08-10-59 AUOUST 10TH,
A Regular Meeting of the City Council was hel,i ~n the Cou~.cil
Chambers at 1:00 P.M., with Mayor .George Talbot Jr, ~n the Chazr, City
Manager W. E. Lawson Jr,., and Commmssioners J LeRoy Croft, Charles H,
Harbison, .Fred B. M~Neeco and George V. Warren being present.
An opening prayer was delivered by Rev. Robert G. Mox~ey.
The C°uncil'ebYhld general consent, approved the Minutes of the
Special Meeting on August Ath, as submitted.
. City Manager Lawson referr.ed to. prior dis. cussions from time to
tune over.recent years, concerning the improvxng of appearance and the
establish~ng of.a uniform right-of-way on West Atlantic Avenue, and
of further, consxderation_ thereof,, as a result of recent preliminary
st. udxe.s made by Mr. George. Sxmons and the PI.arming B.oard in connec-
tion w~th long-range plannxng, as well as tyxng in wxth the County-
w~.de traffic survey for Palm Beach ' County, being advisable at this
tme. The Manager further stated that Mr. KnowIes, Chairman of the
Planning Board,.was present with a sketch of vacant and. improved lots
al.cng W. Atlantxc Avenue as well as a survey and tentative recommend-
at:~ono
Mr, Enowl.es explained of having conferred, accompanied by the
City Manager.~ w~th ~. Stephen. Middleton concerning the minim~n width
of County main arteries, which Mr. Midd.leton advised as being eighty
feet. Mr. Simons had recommended a minunum of 88 feet for said West
AtlAntic Avenue, which is now 88' feet in most areas, said 88 feet be-
ing sufficient..for, providing a four-lane highway with 20 foot parking
areas on Both sxdes of the street.
Mr. Knowles: further advised of having' prepared a survey, of all
vacant lots, as well as improved lots, along W. Atlantic Avenue and
as a result thereof, recommends Council consideration, for obtaining
such land.s as are necessary to provide the desir_ed right-of-way for
W. Atlantxc Avenue from Swlnton Ave. to proposed State Road No.. 9.
Mr. Knowles: furthe~ cited the fact that to pr, ovide a 8Q. R/W it would
Be found ~.u~necess.ary to move any structures (buildings), four .are
found to he withxn an 88 ft R/W and ten are found to lie within the
108 ft R/W as provi~l by an existing ordinance,.
Mr. Knowles, remindin~ the Council that 'an additional 20 feet on
both the North and South s~des of the Avenue will be necessary to ef-
fect a 108 ft R/W,. further advised that Mr. Simons had stated that he
doubted
_ if an~ stores, built on W. Atlantic Ave in the future, would
be of grea.ter depth than 75 ft and therefore various lots and parc.els
of land bexng so improved would pr. ovide for suitable parking facih-
ties at the rear of such store buxldings.
The Council, on motion of Commissioner McNeece and seconded by
Commissioner Croft, .unanimously approve, d requesting the. City Manager
to provide for a survey.of West Atlantic A. venue from Swxnton to pro-
posed State Road No. 9 ~n or~r te establish the North and South lines
necessary,, for providing a 108 ft R/W~ thereon.
.Commissioner Harbison expressed appreci.ation for~ the opportunity
of brxnging before the Council .a recommendatxon for "Rules ~ Order"
and Procedure .to govern the actxons of the Council, an~ stated that
he had ~iven the assignment much thought, had eontected other towns
and cities and found ~hem to be using "Roberts Rules of Order" when
same did not confl.ict with .Charter provis.ions and eXist, ing Ordinances.
The CommiSsioner .c~ted .the xmportant requxrement as bexng that .some
Policy should be establxshed to allow the Chairman of the Council the
opportunity of knowing proper procedure by which to conduct Council
meetings,
Commission. er Harbison then move.~ for adoption of "Roberts Rules
of Order - Rewsed", to govern Councxl procedure, when such Rules do
AUGUST 10th, 1959.
not conflict with Charter provisions nor existing Ordinances, a.n~d fur-
thor to provide necessity of three favorable votes of the Councxl to
cause an affirmative vote to be effected on any motion. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Warren and upon Call of. Ro~l - Commissioners
Harbison and ~'~arren voted in favor thereof, Commmssxoner Croft and
McNeece, together with Mayor Talbot, being opposed. Motion did not
carry.
· City M~_~ager Lawson, informed the Council concerning ~roposed ex-
tension of S. W. 10th Street and related annexation of lan~s west of
the S.A.L. RR., as follows:
.th,
Shat cost for providing cmuplete crossing protectxon would be
$22,500.00. This amount does not include paving costs in connec~
tion with such crossing.
2. Att'y.s Har.~.y Newett a.nd. Rhea ~itle.y have not, as .yet, completel
the preparatxon of Petitions and ordxnances to provide for an--
nexatton of lands west. of the S.A.L. RR., and controlled b.y Mr.
Roy Calam~.a and .associates. These docm~ents should be avaxlabl~,
for Council consideration at the next r~.gular meeting.
$. R.E:. Engineering for t.he Water system in the newly proposed sub-~
.dlv~.sion of Mr, Calamxa's lands. Mayor T.albot suggested that
possxbly the City should employ Smith &-G~llespie, as engineer-
i.ng consult.ants, and Commissioner Croft, agreeing that some en-
gineering f~mm s.hould be employed, felt that Smith & Gillespie
would be the logxcal consultants.
Commissione.r Warren, inquiring of the City Manager if profession-
al engineering was necessamy.in this conne.ction, was advised by
the Manager that. while t.he City's engineering department could
handle the details of th~s function, it might be well to employ
professional aid in order that the desired results be' obtained in
a reasonable and desireable length of time.
· Commissioner McNeece then mov?d the Smit~ & Gillespie be employe~
as. Consulting Engineers for extension of th.e l?ate~ Line and its cros-
szug of the S.A.L, RR., to the proposed subdivision west thereof. Mo-
tion was seconded by Commissioner Croft and unanimously passed.
Relative to the ~uoted cost for providing Crossing Protection,
and upon beSng asked xf Ga.tes, etc., wou.ld be necessa_ry at such cros-
sing, the City Manager advised the Council tha. t the Superi.ntendent of
the S.A.L. RR., had informed him of .recent ruling by _the'Railroad that
no issuance of an unprotected crossxng would be allowed.
City Manager Lawson informe.d the Council, and Mr. Fred M.. ~pinner
whO.is a brok.er for various portxons of Delr_a.y Boa.ch Shores S/D, that
an ~nvestisatxon of the.status of the Water Lxnes.xn that.particu~.ar
area is. being made but x.s not yet completed, the ~nformat~n, having
been d~sclosed thereby, is as follows:
"From a search of Council mSnutes, the following information was
found ~ertaining to the water ma~n on South Ocean Blvd and water main
extensions outside the city in general.
5/8/44 - Mrs. Sm.~th (Lucy M. Smith,, now Lucy Helm), owner, of property
south, of the city l'.z~i~ts (then at Casuarina Road).on the
beach, was advised that the c~ty would only fu~n_ish them w~th water if
they came into the city at the next legislature.
1/8/48 - Councilman W. S. Jacobs asked the City Attorney if the city
has the right to sell water outsid.e the city limits. Mr.
Nowlin stated the Supreme Court rules the c~ty has the right to sell
surplus water.
~ 2
On February 17, 1945, the city and Mr. & Mrs. Burwell Smith entered
into an agreement which provided in part:
'That the city will furnish surplus water for use of the present
and future inhabitants and owners of lands lying in that part of "Sea-
gate" which is south of the city's southern $oundary as proposed to be
extended southwardly, and for use within said part, as long as such
surplus water is available and in the opinion of 'the City Council of
said city it is for the-best .interest of said city to furnish said sur-.
plus water for such use, provzded, nevertheless, that during such
times as the city shall furnish water for use in territory outside the
city, a fair and equitable share of the water so furnzshed shall be
furnished by the city for use of said present and future inha.bitan.ts
and owners of lands in said part of Seagate' and for use within sa~ld
-' ~art. In furnishing water, as aforesa, id, for use within sai.d part of
Seagate, the city shall do so by selling the same to Mrs. Smmth, or
her nominees, at the regular rate charged to out of city water consum-
ers, and the city shall not be required to provide mains through such
outside territory, and Mrs. Smith, or her nominee, shall notify all
users of the provisions of this paragraph. Ail such war.er shall be
· metered through .one master meter located within the terrztory incor-
Porated in the lzmits of the City of Delray Beach. Florida. This me-
ter shall be installed by Mrs. Smith, or her nominee, without ~xpens3
to th~ City of Delray Beach, but shall become the property of the City
of Delray Beach, Florida.' Ail water mains and other water fixtures
not located on private property which are installed in the territory
" .incorporated in the city limits of the City of Delray Beach shall be
installed without expense to the City of Delray Beach an~ shall be-
come the property of said city. Ail water fixtures installed outside
of the territory to be incorporated in the City of Delray Beach shall
be installed without expense to the city. .The city's southern bound-
ary as proposed to be.extend.ed sout~wardly is the south line of the
North 1395 feet of sazd Section 21 (north line of W. S.. Goodspeed pro-
perty) .'
3/14/49 - The extension of water pipe lines south of Seagate for a
distance of 15,000 feet was discussed and referred to the
city attorney for checking of any agreements with Hr. & Mrs. H. A.
Helm w. ho claim t.hey.own the pipe line and Mr. Allabaugh who extended
the hne about 1~ nules south along Ocean Blvd. ·
2/2/80 - Mr. R. ~V. Hert~.ig: representing the Town of Highland ~each,
requested permission for that city to hook-on to the line on
South Ocean Blvd. and to receive water for approximately 90 days until
that Town's water Plant~ is completed. He stated they had permission
of Mrs. D. E. Pickens (the southernmost property owmer on the line)
but there was some objection from some property owners on the line who
feared a lessening of pressure.
City Manager Black explained that the water lines through Seagate
and Byrd. Beach were private.ly owned a.n.d maintain, ed by residents.
Motion passed by Council authorizing the C~ty M~nager to nego-
tiate with the owners of the water lines in Seagate and Byrd Beach to
acquire these lines. (There is no further record of these negotia-
tions).
9/8/81- The. City Council adopted the. "Water. Nain Extension Policy"
whzch contained the followzng prowsions for "Outside the
City" users:
1. The entire cost of line extensions outside the city limits
would be borne by the individual or developer requesting sez~
vice.
2. Plans for extensions into new subdivisions must be approved
by the City Council.
S
AUGUST 10th, 1959.
$. Water rates will be double the established rates for resident
consumers, with the provision that if the property is annexed
not later than the second municipal election following the approval of
the plat of the subdivision the users shall receive as much ~free"
water as they had previously paid for at double rates.
4. Title to all mains is vested in the city and the city shall
have the right to have new customers added to the main without
permission of any party contributing to the original extension.
$. Service connection charges will be over and above main exten-
sion costs.
6. Written agreements incorporating the provisions are to be
signed before any new extension is undertaken.
$/21/§6 - City ~anager Lawson requesting clarification of the Commis-
sion's desire as pertains to water service extension, was in-
structed to supply water from existing mains where only a con-
nection thereto is necessary.
Delray Beach Shores subdivision is comprised of 70 platted lots,
all situated between the Intracoastal~Vaterway and Highway AIA.
Spinner estimated there are 68 property owners of land in the sub-
division. There are three methods of annexation into the city which
are:
A. Petition and consent of the p~operty owners which must be unan-
imous in writing for any contiguous p~cel or area to be an-
nexed.
B. If the tract comrised property owned by nine or loss f~ee-
holders, it may be annexed ~n accordance with thc provisions
of Section 185 of the Charter, sometimes called %y pp~lication".
In this manner the area of Delray Beach Shores could~ssibly
be annexed in about 8groups of lots which would take. quite a
period of time.
C. If the tract to be annexed is comprised of ten or more free-
holders, the annexation can be accomplished by referendum held
in each, the city and the area proposed; and in each a majority
of the freeholders actually voting in the election must approve.,
Of the three,~the first is probably next to impossible to accomplish
in Delray Beach Shores inasmuch as it is doubtful if each and every
property owner would request annexation at the present time. The
second method is feasible, but would take quite some time to accom-
plish - about one and a half years or longer depending upon Council
desires a~d possible legal actions. The latter method is probably the
most feasible, but also.the most costly inasmuch as two separate ref-
n "
erendums are required w~th the resultant election expe ses.
/S/ W. E. LAWSON JR., City M'g'r.
Mr. Fred M. Spinner protested the delay of the Council in ex-
tending him water service into Delray Beach Shores S/D.
The Council discussed the possibility and advisability of em-'
loying an attorney to serve in the absence of City Att'y. Harry T.
ewett.
Commissioner McNeece moved the matter of extending water service
to Delray Beach Shores be tabled pending legal advice from the City
Attorney or a temporary ~ttorney employed for the period of the C~ty
Attorney's absence. M~t~on seconded by Commissioner Croft and upon
Call of Roll - Commissioners McNeece and Croft, tosether with Mayor
Talbot, voted in favor thereof, Commissioners Harb~son and V~arren
being opposed. Motion carried.
A
AUGUST 10th, 19~9. 171
Commissioner Warren then moved that an alternate attorney be
ointed to serve in the absence of the City Attorney who is now at-
ending Army maneuvers at annual summer training camp. N~tien was
seconded by Commissioner Harbison and unanimously approved.
City Manager Lawson then read - - - ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING; AMENDING SUBPARA-
GRAPH 2(c) OF SECTION 29-?.2 OF THE CODE OF ORDI-
NANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, TO
ELININATE RESTRICTION UPON NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES FOR
RETAIL BAKEP~Y.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEIRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. That Subparagraph 2(c) of Section 29-?.2 of the Code.
~ of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida~
is hereby amended by striking the words "not more than five employees"
following the word ~'bakery", so that said subparagraph 2(c) shall
read as follows: ·
"(c) Bakery."
PASSED and ADOPTED on second and final reading this 10th day of
August, 1989~
-McN?ece,' the~ C'o~u~cil unau~mously apprOv~.d 'the' PAs~ing 'and'~Ad°ptlon of
Ordinance No.'~G~$24 ~on 'thi's'~second' an~ fina'l readingj ' ~ ~''''
Th~ ~City Mam. ager submitted ~and re.~ad - ORDINANCE NO, G-325:
AN ,ORDINANCE RELATING ,TO ZONING: AM~ENDING SECTION
29~7.6 ~OF 'THE ~CODE'OF ORDINANCES 0F THE CITY OF
~and "C-3" DISTRICTS' ~ICH. ARE BOUNDED' ~0N REAR 'BY ~.
AN ALLEY SHALL HAVE A REAR ~SETBA CK OF TEN FEET,~
MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SUCH ALLEY.
'B~E'IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA:
SECTION !.. That section 29z7.6 'of the Code of .O~dinances of~ the
~' . .CLty of. Del~y. Bea~Ch, Florida, is hereby amended, by
pro ~ding the following additional provision;
"Ail C.o.mmercial'bui.ldin~s her.ea.fter erected.upon
.Proper. taes located '~n ."C~i'' ~Lxm~ted Commercial
bistr~ct, and in "C-2" General Commercial District,
and in "C'3" V~.olesale. Distribution and Ligkt~. In-
dUstrial Distr~ct~ whl0hI proper~ties are .'bounded .enl.
~ ~the rear. by an alley, shall be~ se'~back a~ distance ·
Of. ten. (10.)~ feet fr~m the. centerI~ne of .such alley'~
and no structure shall be erected, altered or recon-
structed within such areas located~.within ten .(lO)
~eet of the centerline of such alley."
PASSED and'ADOPTED on.-second and final?reading,., this 10th day
of August, I959'. ,
On motion cf Commissioner Harbison and seconded by'Commissioner
McNeece, the Council unanimously agreed on .the Passing and Adoption
of Ordinance No. G-$25 on this second and final reading.~
.The City'Mamag~r then presented the following ',Reports" from. the
Planning Board:
AU US lOCh, !959. RE: Request of ~. A. G, Pruyser Jr.,
1, "At its regular meeting e~ July 31, ~959, the Plying & Zoning
B?a~ consi~?e~ t~e req?st for a f~ve foot rear set~ack dewa-
t~on to ~e~t the erection of a screened enclos~e aro~ a sw~-
rang
There have been t~ee heari~s in this m~tter so ~11 parties
have been well advised of facts and procedures.
The Board ~imously agreed tB~t s~nce Fishers ~e is very
narrow and is a ~in access to dwellings thereon that a ten foot
'~'set-back is ~nim~ and not too much to preserve vSsibility as well
as the'cham.~Of'the street t~t the request for this structure
denied. "~ '~
/S/ PA~ S. ~'~ES, Chair~
The Co,oil, on motion of Co~issione~ McNeece, seconded by
~ssioner Crof~,.~nimously approved denial of ~. Pr~ser's re-
quest .in sustaining the reco~endatlon of the Pla~ingBoar~.
2~ "At'its regula~ meeting on July 31, 1959 the Pla~ing and Zoning
Bgar~..conside~ed the request of ~s. Mildred H. C~non for per-
masi~e.useifor the opera:rich of a childrens home on Lot 24, B~.
118'. which is S,E. ls~ Street an~ Federal ~.
~' Ail persons present were objectors, but a letter from. the
o~ers of the p~operty was ~ntro~ucet as being oppose~, which as
far as we were concerned vol~ed the ~equest.
This highlights the fact that only o~ers should rake re-
quests for ~eViations a~d should be present to make their request
or have their agent present for them, .
At. this meeting the Board ag~ee~ that o~ers or their agents
shall be present at'the time the ~e~st is heard o~ the Board wi~
a "'
not act on the c se. , -. ~
'~',~, '~ /S/ PAUL S. ~O~ES,
. The Co.oil accepted the, reCo~endatton ~of the Planing
3. "At its regular meeting on~ July 31, 1959 the Pla~ing & Zoning .
~ Board Considered the request of Y~. F~eSerick G. Wee~ for a set
back deviation on Lots 8 and 9 in Park Court S/D.
In view of the 80 foot access established by ordi~nce, the
BOard ~animo~ly approved this ~equest since he can ~ve access
to the carport either thru present drive in this access
c~e in directly from N.E. 1st Street. This can ~rdly set a
precedent nor can it be of concern to the neighbor to the west."
/S/ PA~ S. ~OWLES, C~irman
~ motion ~of Co~ssioner Harbison and seconded by Co~ssioner
~Neece, the Co,oil ~anim~usly approved the request of ~. Frederick
G. Weed for a.four foot set back to carport on the west side.of Lots
8 and 9 in Park Cour-t S/D, .as reco~ended by the P~ing Board.
A. "At its regular meeting on July 81, lp59, the Pla~ing & Zoning
Board considered the suggestion sub~tted to you by Dr. L. C.
Gyl~en~rg to rename N'E-2nd Ave., northward, from 8th Street,
to Seac~eSt Blvd. '
Since changing an already n~ed street involves considerable
trouble and some expense to.residents by way of ch~ging all le-
gal doc~en~s, insurance policies, etc., the Board reco~ends
that a public hearing be held to ascertain the desire of the
residents themselves.
The Board has no objection othe~ise to the rena~ng."
/S/ PA~ S. ~O~LES, Chair~
. Co~ssioner Croft inquired as to~w~t is to be acc~plished by
such ren~ng of a portion of N. E. Second Avenue.
Co~ssioner Warren felt ~hat such expenses might be ~rr~ted
and favored contacting all part~es concerned, in order to deter~ne,
once and for all, if such ren~tng should be authorized, as City Na~-
ge~ ~wson info,ed the Co,oil as follows:
AUGUST 10th, 1959.
"On January 11, 1955 a similar request and recommendation for the
City to rename N. E. 2nd Avenue to Seacrest Blvd. was referred to the
Planning Board. The Planning Board reported on January 22nd and it was
considered by the Council at the January 25th meeting. In general, the
Planning Board felt that insufficient reasons were shown for the name
change and recommended that the request be denied. By a 3 to I vote,
the City Council upheld the Planning Board recommendation."
Col. Andrew Fabens, speaking as an individual with no interest
in any property in the affected area, did not favor rena~ing of said
N. E. 2nd Avenue and suggested the possiblility of an added name plate
to the existing sign post indicating the "Direction" of Seacrest Blvd.
The Council, on motion of Commissioner Croft and seconded by Com-
missioner Harbison, unanimously approved referral of this suggestion,
as submitted by Col. Fabens, to the Planning Board for consideration
and recommendation.
On Motion of Commissioner Harbison and seconded by Commissioner
Croft, the Council unanimously approved for payment, subject to the
approval of the Finance Committee, the following Bills submitted by
the City Manager:
General Fund $ 73,285.61
Water-Operating 11,842.15
Special Assessment 10,279.57
Refundable Deposits 2,965.42
Payrolls 19,634.31
On motion of Commissioner McNeece and seconded by Commissioner
Harbison, the Council unanimously agreed on authorizing the City Mana-
ger to proceed with providing for installation of Flashing Lights in
the neighborhood of public schools and recommended by Chief of Police
R. C. Croft to be as follows:
2 @ Plumosa Park School
4 @ Delray Beach Elementary
2 @ W. Atlantic Avenue
2 @ Spady Elementary
City Manager Lawson informed the Council of having solicited
bids for removal of old sidewalks and construction of new walks on
the south side of Atlantic Avenue, between Swinton and S. E. 1st Avers.,
which, it is estimated, would result in 2,330 square feet of walk, and
of having received but one bid, that being from a local contractor Mr.
R. M. Garner, and in the amount of 45~ per square foot, which amount,
the Public Works Director, feels to be a reasonable bid.'
On motion of Commissioner McNeece and seconded by Commissioner
Warren, the Council unanimously approved award of contract to Mr. R.
M. Garner for construction of a NEW Sidewalk on the south side of
Atlantic Avenue from Swinton to S. E. 1st Avenues at a cost of forty-
five (45) cents per square foot, as recommended by the Director of
Public Works.
The Council requested the City Manager to solicit the re-surfac-
ing of Atlantic Avenue, in February 1960, by the County.
Commissioner Warren reported to the Council that both he and Com-
missioner Croft had conferred at length with Director of Recreation
Tom Gray concerning proposed site and tentative plans for a Civic
Center and were ready to proceed with further and definite plans, and
submitted the following names for membership to the "Recreational
Advisory Board":
Dr. E. Monro Farber
Mr. Roy M. Simon
~ir. John A. Thayer
Mrs. Helen Lee
Mr. Jas. C. Raymond
AUGUST 10th, !9%9.
The'council,~ on motion of Commissioner Warren and secomted by
Commissioner ltarbison, unanimously approved the ,appointment of -
Dr. E. Monroe Father
M~s. Helen Lee
Mm. Jas. C..Raymond
Ma-, Roy M. Simon
Mm. John A. Thayer
to constitute the Membership of the "Recreational Advisory Board",
and each of whom to serve until a successor be appointed.
Commissioner Harbison requested being advised what Rules of Order
govern the actions of this Council and clarification of such-Rules of
Procedure. '
Mayor Talbot vacated the Chair to allow for any desired action on
the matter, stating that he felt the past policy and procedure of this
Council had been understood and had operated' in the best interests of
all concerned.
Commissioner Croft inquired if any Commissioner had any objections
to the proposed Rules of Procedure as submitted by City Manager Lawson
sometime ago, but never adopted.
_ Commissioner Harbison suggested that a study of such proposed
Rules of Procedure should be made - Item by Item - in order to deter-
mine if sUch 'Procedure' is that which the Council desires~ The C°m'
missioner expressed preference for Roberts Rules of Order but cited
the importance of the adoption of some Rules of Procedure under which
the Council is to function.
Commissioner Warre.n. moved for adoption of Roberts Rules o.f Order
when not in conflict with existing Ordinances or Charter
and a requirement of three favorab.le votes to cause an aff~.rm.atlve vote
to be effecte~ on any motion. Motion was seconded'by Commssloner
Harbison. ·
In the discussion which followed, Vice-Mayor McNeece, in the Chair
vacated by Mayor Talbot, identified this motion as being identical to
a motion p~eViously acted upon by the Council at this meeting, and
considered further consideration' of same unnecessary. Commissioner
Warren then withdrew his motion.
The Council, at the.'.%uggestion of Mayor Talbot, requested· the City
Manager to.instruct the Ci~.~-Attor~.e~ to prepare an Ordinance, for
consideration by the Council, providing for -
"An ordinance establishing Minimum Housing Standards'
for the City of Delr. ay"Beach, Florida, for the pro-
tection of the pubhc health, safety, morals and wel-
fare of the people."
The Council, on motion of Commissioner Warren ~nd seconded by
Commissioner Ha. rbison, unanimously agreed that a Special Meeting be
p. rovided for 1.00 P.M., Monday, August 81st, 1~$9, for a Public Hear-
lng on the proposed Budget for 1~S9-1~80.
On motion of Commissioner Harbison and seconded by Com~m~[~[ssioner
Warren, the Council unanimously approved and request.ed the City Mana-
ger to contact Russell & Axom: inviting the engi.neerlng firm to aPT
pear at the next. Council Meeting for an oppo. rtun~ty to present
proposal concerning the proposed sewage pro,eot.
MEETING ADJOURNED:
. R.D. WORTHING