Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Ord 17-10
ORDINANCE NO. 17-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMPREHENSNE PLAN AMENDMENT 2010-1, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSNE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT", FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 163.3161 THROUGH 163.3243, INCLUSNE; ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT " A" ENTITLED COMPREHENSNE PLAN AMENDMENT 2010-1" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTNE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach exercised the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161 through 163.3243, inclusive, known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 82·89, the City Commission adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan -Delray Beach, Florida"; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, did prepare an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, following due public notice, held public hearings on July 19,2010 and August 16,2010, in accordance with the requirements of the " Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3174( 4), the Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, has determined that the changes are consistent with and further the objectives and policies ofthe Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, after the above referenced public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, recommended to the City Commission that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 be transmitted; and WHEREAS, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 was submitted to and reviewed by the City Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Commission ofthe City ofDelray Beach adopts the findings in the Planning and Zoning StaffReport; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach finds the ordinance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the first of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 was held by the City Commission on August 17,2010, at which time it was authorized to be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for required review and the Florida Department of Community Affairs did not issue an ORC (Objections, Recommendations and Comments) Report; and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the second of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 was held by the City Commission on December 14, 2010, in accordance with statutory requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS; Section 1. That the recitations set forth above are incorporated herein. Section 2. That the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, hereby declares its intent to exercise the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161 through 163.3243, inclusive, known as the " Local Government Planning and Land Development Regulation Act." Section 3. That in implementation ofits declared intent as set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance, there is hereby adopted the document entitled " Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1," which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. That the document entitled " Comprehensive Plan -Delray Beach, Florida" is hereby amended pursuant to the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1. Section 5. That should any section or provision ofthis ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be declared by a court ofcompetent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity ofthe remainder hereofas a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. 2 ORD. NO. 17-10 Section 6. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed. Section 7. That the effective date ofthis ordinance, is upon the date a final order is issued by the Florida Department ofCommunity Affairs (DCA) finding the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184(9), F.S.; or the date a final order is issued by the Administration Commission determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184(10), F.S. I d.t PASSED AND ~ ED in regular session on second and final reading on this the L.f-.-:-day of ]) Q t{J) 1!~ , 2010. ATTEST MAYOR Ilo' N~~f/J. jj~ 7 City Clerk ' First Reading ~ It7/ro r Second Reading 1'1; /1ill0 I I 3 ORD. NO. 17-10 WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach adopts the findings in the Planning and Zoning Staff Report; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach finds the ordinance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the first of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 was held by the City Commission on August 17,2010, at which time it was authorized to be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for required review and the Florida Department of Community Affairs did not issue an ORC (Objections, Recommendations and Comments) Report; and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the second of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 was held by the City Commission on December 14, 2010, in accordance with statutory requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS; Section 1. That the recitations set forth above are incorporated herein. Section 2. That the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, hereby declares its intent to exercise the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161 through 163.3243, inclusive, known as the "Local Government Planning and Land Development Regulation Act." Section 3. That in implementation of its declared intent as set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance, there is hereby adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1," which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. That the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan -Delray Beach, Florida" is hereby amended pursuant to the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1. Section 5. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. 2 ORD. NO. 17-10 Section 6. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed. Section 7. That the effective date of this ordinance, is upon the date a final order is issued by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) finding the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184(9), F.S.; or the date a final order is issued by the Administration Commission determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184(10), F.S. I d.t PASSED AND ~ED in regular session on second and final reading on this the L.f-.-:-day of ])Q t{J)1!~ , 2010. ATTEST MA YOR Ilo'N~~f/ J. jj~ 7 City Clerk ' First Reading ~It 7/ro r Second Reading 1'1; /1 ill 0 I I 3 ORD. NO. 17-10 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=4045&Meeti MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Ronald Hoggard, AICP, Principal Planner Paul Dorling, AICP, Director Planning and Zoning THROUGH: City Manager DATE: December 7, 2010 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 10.D. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 14, 2010 ORDINANCE NO. 17-10 (SECOND READING/ADOPTION HEARING FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2010-1) ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION The item before the City Commission is that of adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1. BACKGROUND Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 was approved on first reading on August 17, 2010 and transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for review. The amendment included two (2) city-initiated Future Land Use Map Amendments, twenty (20) city-initiated text amendments, two (2) privately-initiated Future Land Use Map Amendments and two (2) privatelyinitiated text amendments. DCA staff reviewed the transmitted amendment and did not issue an Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report. It is noted that one of the city-initiated Future Land Use Map Amendments, Breezy Acres, has been eliminated from 2010-1. The properties in the Breezy Acres subdivision can only be accessed from Markland Lane which dead ends at the south end of the subdivision. The County objected because the annexation of three (3) of the ten (10) parcels would result in an isolated county pocket at the south end of the subdivision and the Sheriff's Office felt that this split jurisdiction would result in safety issues related to emergency calls. The County recommended that we postpone the annexation until such time that the complete subdivision is annexed. We plan to move forward next year with the annexation of all ten (10) Breezy Acres properties and additional contiguous properties. At that time, the three (3) properties subject to a voluntary annexation clause in the water service agreements will count as positive votes for the annexation. Four of the city-initiated text amendments have been modified since the DCA review. These include the following: • The City’s Five-Year Capital Improvements Schedule (Table CI-CIP) has been updated to FY2011-Coversheet Page 1 of 5 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID =4045&MeetingID=279 2/3/2012 FY2015; • The Palm Beach County School District’s Capital Improvement Schedule (Table SD-CIP) has been updated FY2011-FY2015; • The City’s Reclaimed Water Capital Improvement Schedule (Table RW-CIP) has been updated to FY2011-FY2015; and • Conservation Element Objective E-1 has been further modified to incorporate language from the City’s Mission Statement on Sustainability. The amendment now includes one (1) city-initiated Future Land Use Map Amendment, twenty (20) city-initiated text amendments, two (2) privately-initiated Future Land Use Map Amendments and two (2) privately-initiated text amendments. A brief description of each item is provided below and a full analysis is contained in the attached Comprehensive Plan Amendment and support documents. 1. TEXT AMENDMENTS: a. City-initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the City’s Five-Year Capital Improvements Schedule (Table CI-CIP) to reflect adoption of the FY2011-FY2015 Capital Improvements Program. b. City-initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the City’s Reclaimed Water Capital Improvement Schedule (Table RW-CIP) to reflect adoption of the FY2011-FY2015 Capital Improvements Program. c. City-initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the Palm Beach County School District’s Capital Improvement Schedule (Table SD-CIP) to reflect adoption of its FY2011-FY2015 Capital Improvements Program. d. City-initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the General Fund Revenue and Expenditure 5-Year Forecast Table. e. City-initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the Pledgeable Revenue Matrix Table. f. City initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the Debt Summary Table. g. City-initiated: Conservation Element -Modification of Objective E-1 and Policy E-1.1, dealing with the Green Task Force, to reflect new name (Green Implementation Advancement Board) and expanded Board purpose. h. City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-1.4 to extend the time frame for completion of a study on economic development issues from FY08/09 to FY11/12. i. City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-1.10 to extend the time frame for evaluating the need for establishing design guidelines for the Congress Avenue Corridor and the Four Corners Overlay District from FY08/09 to FY10/11. j. City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-1.11 to extend the time to develop a marketing plan to attract new business and promote redevelopment of the Congress Avenue corridor from FY08/09 to FY10/11. Coversheet Page 2 of 5 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Blues heet.aspx?ItemID=4045&MeetingID=279 2/3/2012 k. City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-2.5 to extend the time frame for analysis of the Land Development Regulations, dealing with nonconforming uses, from FY08/09 to FY11/12. l. City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy C-1.4 to extend the time frame for evaluating the need for establishing design guidelines for the North Federal Highway corridor from FY08/09 to FY10/11. m. City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy C-1.12 to extend the time frame for completion of a Redevelopment Plan for the South Federal Highway from FY08/09 to FY10/11. n. City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy C-1.13 to extend the time frame for completion of a Redevelopment Plan for Linton Boulevard, from I-95 to Federal Highway, from FY08/09 to FY10/11. o. Privately-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify specific uses and intensities (FARs) for development within a proposed overlay district for the Lintco property on the north side of Linton Boulevard, west of SW 4th Avenue. p. Privately initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify specific uses and intensities (FARs) for development within a proposed overlay district for Waterford located east of I-95, south of Linton Boulevard. q. City-initiated: Housing Element -Deletion of Policy B-3.3 (Completed). r. City-initiated: Transportation Element -Modification of Policy A-1.8 to extend the time frame for investigation of the feasibility of implementing an impact fee or other system for assessment of new development to fund operation of the downtown roundabout shuttle service from FY08/09 to FY10/11. s. City-initiated: Transportation Element -Modification of Objective A-8 to extend the time frame for development of a program to encourage street trees for green linkages from FY08/09 to FY10/11. t. City-initiated: Transportation Element -Modification of Policy D-2.4 to extend the time frame for adoption of a bicycle network plan for the city from FY09/10 to FY11/12. u. City-initiated: Transportation Element -Modification of Policy D-3.1 to extend the time frame for completion of surveys and analysis to determine the issues and needs for employer based TDM activities, including but not limited to ride sharing, van pooling, and flexible work hours, from FY09/10 to FY10/11. v. City-initiated: Transportation Element -Modification of Policy D-3.5 to extend the time frame to determine the operational feasibility and grant funding requirements necessary to provide shuttle service to meet and greet all trains at the station from FY08/09 to FY10/11. 2. FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS: a. City-initiated Future Land Use Map amendment to assign a City Future Land Use Map designation concurrently with the annexation of “The Marketplace of Delray”, containing approximately 30.26 Coversheet Page 3 of 5 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=4045&MeetingID=279 2/3/2012 acres of property located at the northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail. The current County Land Use Map designation is CH/8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential of 8 units per acre) and the proposed City designation is GC (General Commercial). b. Privately-initiated Future Land Use Map amendment for the approximate 7.08 acre Lintco property located on the north side of Linton Boulevard, west of SW 4th Avenue, from MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/acre) to GC (General Commercial). c. Privately-initiated Future Land Use Map amendment for a 4.58 acre parcel located within Waterford, east of I-95, south of Linton Boulevard, from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial). REVIEW BY OTHERS The Planning and Zoning Board held its public hearing regarding the Comprehensive Plan Amendment on July 19, 2010. The applicant for the privately-initiated Future Land Use Map amendment and text amendment for the proposed Lintco Development, spoke in favor of those amendments. Several members of the public questioned the need for the City to annex the “Marketplace of Delray” property and were concerned about the increase in property taxes when annexed. The owner of the Ugly Mug bar at the Marketplace was concerned about his ability to continue to sell alcohol until 5:00 AM in the city. No one from the public spoke on any of the proposed text amendments. The issue with the hours of the Ugly Mug has been addressed in the Annexation Ordinance, which allows the Ugly Mug to continue operating under Palm Beach County Code requirements concerning hours of operation for 20 years from the date of adoption of the ordinance. After discussion, the Board voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1, with the exception of the Breezy Acres Future Land Use Map amendment (tabled until August 16, 2010), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the Future Land Use Map amendments and approval thereof are consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), LDR Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. On August 16, 2010, the Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing regarding the Breezy Acres Future Land Use Map Amendment, which was tabled at its July 19, 2010 meeting, and several additional items initiated by the City Commission on August 3, 2010. These additional items included text amendments “d”, “e”, “f” and “p”, and Future Land Use Map amendment “c”, as listed above. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended that the City Commission add these items to Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1. Formal public notice was provided to all property owners within a 500' radius of the subject properties for the three FLUM amendments. No letters of objection were received for the Marketplace of Delray or the Lintco FLUM amendments. A letter of objection for the Waterford FLUM amendment was received prior to review by the Planning and Zoning Board and was included in the Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report (attached as Support Document #20). An additional letter of objection from the same individual, Joel Harmatz, was received on September 28, 2010 and is also attached. RECOMMENDATION By motion, approve Ordinance No. 17-10 on second reading, adopting Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the proposed text amendments support and further the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan, and further finding that the Future Land Use Map amendments are consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), LDR Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Coversheet Page 4 of 5 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=4045&MeetingID=279 2/3/2012 Plan, and transmit the adopted Amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Coversheet Page 5 of 5 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=4045&MeetingID=279 2/3/2012 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2010 -1 Planning & Zoning Board Transmittal Public Hearing July 19, 2010 & August 16, 2010 City Commission Transmittal Public Hearing August 17, 2010 City Commission Adoption Public Hearing December 14, 2010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ Page TEXT CHANGES -(CITY INITIATED) 1 Capital Improvement Element -Update the City’s Five-Year Capital Improvements Schedule (Table CI-CIP) to reflect adoption of the FY2011-FY2015 Capital Improvements Program. 1 Capital Improvement Element -Update the City’s Reclaimed Water Capital Improvement Schedule (Table RW-CIP) to reflect adoption of the FY2011-FY2015 Capital Improvements Program. 1 Capital Improvement Element -Update the Palm Beach County School District’s Capital Improvement Schedule (Table SD-CIP) to reflect adoption of its FY2011-FY2015 Capital Improvements Program. 2 Capital Improvement Element -Update General Fund Revenue and Expenditure 5-Year Forecast Table to reflected updated timeframes. 2 Capital Improvement Element -Update Pledgeable Revenue Matrix Table to reflected updated timeframes. 2 Capital Improvement Element -Update Debt Summary Table to reflected updated timeframes. 2 Conservation Element -Modification of Objective E-1 and Policy E-1.1, dealing with the Green Task Force, to reflect new name (Green Implementation Advancement Board) and expanded Board purpose. 4 Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-1.4 to extend the time frame for completion of a study on economic development issues from FY08/09 to FY11/12. 4 Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-1.10 to extend the time frame for evaluating the need for establishing design guidelines for the Congress Avenue Corridor and the Four Corners Overlay District. from FY08/09 to FY10/11. Page 4 Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-1.11 to extend the time to develop of a marketing plan to attract new business and promote redevelopment of the Congress Avenue corridor from FY08/09 to FY10/11. 5 Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-2.5 to extend the time frame for analysis of the Land Development Regulations, dealing with nonconforming uses, from FY08/09 to FY11/12. 5 Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy C-1.4 to extend the time frame for evaluating the need for establishing design guidelines for the North Federal Highway corridor from FY08/09 to FY10/11. 6 Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy C-1.12 to extend the time frame for completion of a Redevelopment Plan for the South Federal Highway from FY08/09 to FY10/11. 7 Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy C-1.13 to extend the time frame for completion of a Redevelopment Plan for Linton Boulevard, from I-95 to Federal Highway, from FY08/09 to FY10/11. 7 Housing Element -Deletion of Policy B-3.3 (Completed). 8 Transportation Element -Modification of Policy A-1.8 to extend the time frame for investigation of the feasibility of implementing an impact fee or other system for assessment of new development to fund operation of the downtown roundabout shuttle service from FY08/09 to FY10/11. 8 Transportation Element -Modification of Objective A-8 to extend the time frame for development of a program to encourage street trees for green linkages from FY08/09 to FY10/11. 8 Transportation Element -Modification of Policy D-2.4 to extend the time frame for adoption of a bicycle network plan for the city from FY09/10 to FY11/12. 9 Transportation Element -Modification of Policy D-3.1 to extend the time frame for completion of surveys and analysis to determine the issues and needs for employer based TDM activities, including but not limited to ride sharing, van pooling, and flexible work hours, from FY09/10 to FY10/11. 9 Transportation Element -Modification of Policy D-3.5 to extend the time frame to determine the operational feasibility and grant funding requirements necessary to provide shuttle service to meet and greet all trains at the station from FY08/09 to FY10/11. Page TEXT CHANGES -(PRIVATELY INITIATED) 10 Future Land Use Element – Modification of the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify specific uses and intensities (FARs) for development within a proposed overlay district for the Lintco property on the north side of Linton Boulevard, west of SW 4th Avenue. 15 Future Land Use Element – Modification of the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify specific uses and intensities (FARs) for development within a proposed overlay district for Waterford, located east of I-95, south of Linton Boulevard. AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP – (CITY INITIATED) 22 Marketplace at Delray AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP – (PRIVATELY INITIATED) 22 Lintco Development 22 Waterford ( 1 ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA TEXT CHANGES CITY-INITIATED TEXT CHANGES: 1) Location: Capital Improvement Element -Pgs. CI-26 to CI-28, Table CI-CIP, Table CI-CIP (5-Year Capital Improvements Schedule For Projects > $25,000) See existing table attached as Support Document #1. Change: REVISION Comment: The City Commission has adopted the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY2010-11 to FY2014-15. Therefore, the table has been revised to reflect the new CIP. See revised table attached as Support Document #2. 2) Location: Capital Improvement Element -Pgs. CI-30 to CI-36, Table SDCIP, School District of Palm Beach County Capital Improvement Schedule See existing table attached as Support Document #3. Change: REVISION Comment: This table is the updated School District’s Capital Improvement Schedule for FY2011-FY2015. See revised table attached as Support Document #4. 3) Location: Capital Improvement Element -Pg. CI-37, Table RW-CIP, Reclaimed Water Capital Improvement Schedule See existing table attached as Support Document #5. Change: REVISION Comment: This table is part of the integration of the 20 Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan into the Comprehensive Plan. The City Commission has adopted the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY2010-11 to FY2014-15. Therefore, the table has been revised to reflect the new CIP. See revised table attached as Support Document #6. ( 2 ) 4) Location: Capital Improvement Element -Pgs. CI-12, General Fund Revenue and Expenditure 5-Year Forecast Table See existing table attached as Support Document #7. Change: REVISION Comment: The table is being modified to update the timeframes. See revised table attached as Support Document #8. 5) Location: Capital Improvement Element -Pgs. CI-13, Pledgeable Revenue Matrix Table See existing table attached as Support Document #9. Change: REVISION Comment: The table is being modified to update the timeframes. See revised table attached as Support Document #10. 6) Location: Capital Improvement Element -Pg. CI-14 to CI-15, Debt Summary Table See existing table attached as Support Document #11. Change: REVISION Comment: The table is being modified to update the timeframes. See revised table attached as Support Document #12. 7) Location: Conservation Element -Pg. CO-17, Objective E-1 and Policy E-1.1 (Sustainability) Objective E-1 In 2008, determine an actionable set of recommendations that enables the City of Delray Beach to implement its current environmental commitments in a timely, costeffective, and citizen-centric manner, as well as explore new opportunities for sustainability. Policy E-1.1 In 2008, a Green Task Force shall be created to address the following issues and provide a report to the City Commission: 1. Ways to improve the environmental Sustainability of City programs, services, and equipment facilities. 2. Strategies for improving environmental sustainability of the community ( 3 ) 3. Incentives for residents, businesses, and organizations to practice environmental conservation including recycling 4. Proposed means to enhance water and energy conservation. 5. Ideas for promotion of tree planting and xeriscaping. 6. Best Practices for implementation in Delray Beach, including long-term strategies. Change: REVISION Objective E-1 In 2008 Annually, determine an actionable set of recommendations that enables the City of Delray Beach to implement its current environmental commitments in a timely, cost-effective, and citizen-centric manner, as well as explore new opportunities for sustainability. The City of Delray Beach encourages land use planning and development based on sustainability principles and practices. The City also, when applicable, recommends implementation of policies and programs that provide environmental, economic and social benefits to residents, businesses, visitors and other governmental agencies to strengthen Delray Beach’s position as a model of sustainable practices. Policy E-1.1 In 2008, a Green Task Force shall be created to address the following issues and provide a report to the City Commission. By February 1st of each year, the Green Implementation Advancement Board (GIAB), shall review City operations and policies toward achieving Delray Beach’s green and sustainability goals and providing a report of recommendation to the City Commission regarding: 1. Ways to improve the environmental Sustainability of City programs, services, and equipment facilities. 2. Strategies for improving environmental sustainability of the community 3. Incentives for residents, businesses, and organizations to practice environmental conservation including recycling. 4. Proposed means to enhance water and energy conservation. 5. Ideas for promotion of tree planting and xeriscaping. 6. Best Practices for implementation in Delray Beach, including long-term strategies. 7. Proposed revisions to City Ordinances to address Green Technologies. The GIAB will consider the cost and environmental implications related to any potential recommendation to the City . The GIAB’s consideration will include the “Double Bottom Line” approach, which includes: • Financial – Total cost, funding availability and is the payback within a reasonable timeframe (5-8 years) • Environmental -Is the recommendation good for the environment within the City of Delray Beach and does it improve the City’s overall quality of life. Comment: This Objective and Policy are being revised to reflect the new name for the Green Task Force, (Green Implementation Advancement Board) and expanded Board purpose. ( 4 ) 8) Location: Future Land Use Element -Pg. FL-18, Policy A-1.4 (Economic Development Study) Policy A-1.4 The City shall undertake a comprehensive study of economic development issues and needs in FY 08/09. The study will, at a minimum, assess the major economic components of the City to determine the uses necessary to accommodate employment needs and sustain economic growth. Recommendations made in the study regarding land use needs shall be adopted as policies in the Future Land Use Element. Change: REVISION Policy A-1.4 The City shall undertake a comprehensive study of economic development issues and needs in FY 08/09 2011-12. The study will, at a minimum, assess the major economic components of the City to determine the uses necessary to accommodate employment needs and sustain economic growth. Recommendations made in the study regarding land use needs shall be adopted as policies in the Future Land Use Element. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. 9) Location: Future Land Use Element -Pg. FL-20, Policy A-1.10 (Design Guidelines) Policy A-1.10 In FY 2008/09, the Planning & Zoning department shall evaluate the need for establishing design guidelines for the Congress Avenue Corridor and the Four Corners Overlay District. Change: REVISION Policy A-1.10 In FY 2008/09 2010/11, the Planning & Zoning department shall evaluate the need for establishing design guidelines for the Congress Avenue Corridor and the Four Corners Overlay District. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. 10) Location: Future Land Use Element -Pg. FL-20, Policy A-1.11 (Congress Avenue Corridor) Policy A-1.11 In FY 2008/09, the City shall work with the Chamber of Commerce to develop a marketing plan to attract new business and promote redevelopment of the Congress Avenue Corridor. Change: REVISION ( 5 ) Policy A-1.11 In FY 2008/09 2010/11, the City shall work with the Chamber of Commerce to develop a marketing plan to attract new business and promote redevelopment of the Congress Avenue Corridor. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. 11) Location: Future Land Use Element -Pg. FL-21, Policy A-2.5 (Nonconforming Uses) Policy A-2.5 The section of the Land Development Regulations that deals with nonconforming uses and structures shall be comprehensively evaluated in order to ensure that the restrictions on the continuation, expansion, and improvement of nonconforming structures and uses are clear and enforceable. This evaluation and the subsequent LDR changes shall be completed in FY 08/09. Change: REVISION Policy A-2.5 The section of the Land Development Regulations that deals with nonconforming uses and structures shall be comprehensively evaluated in order to ensure that the restrictions on the continuation, expansion, and improvement of nonconforming structures and uses are clear and enforceable. This evaluation and the subsequent LDR changes shall be completed in FY 08/09 2011/12. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. 12) Location: Future Land Use Element -Pg. FL-28, Policy C-1.4 (Design Guidelines) Policy C-1.4 The following pertains to the North Federal Highway Corridor: The North Federal Highway Corridor is defined as the area bounded by the FEC railroad right-of-way to the west, the easterly boundary of the CRA to the east, NE 4th Street to the south, and the north City limits to the north. Properties in the corridor that front on Federal Highway primarily contain small-scale, strip commercial development. Many parcels in the area contain vacant or dilapidated structures, substandard parking, and substandard landscaping. The area also contains residential areas identified as “Stabilization” and “Revitalization” on the Residential Neighborhood Categorization Map contained in the Housing Element. Many of the remaining parcels in the area are currently vacant. Due to those conditions, the North Federal Highway Corridor is hereby identified as a blighted area. The North Federal Highway Redevelopment Plan was approved by City Commission on March 16, 1999. The Plan identified the need for limited rezonings and LDR amendments, along with improvements necessary to accomplish certain ( 6 ) redevelopment goals. Future development in the area must be in accordance with the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. In FY 2008/09, the Planning & Zoning department shall evaluate the need for establishing design guidelines for the corridor. Change: REVISION Policy C-1.4 The following pertains to the North Federal Highway Corridor: The North Federal Highway Corridor is defined as the area bounded by the FEC railroad right-of-way to the west, the easterly boundary of the CRA to the east, NE 4th Street to the south, and the north City limits to the north. Properties in the corridor that front on Federal Highway primarily contain small-scale, strip commercial development. Many parcels in the area contain vacant or dilapidated structures, substandard parking, and substandard landscaping. The area also contains residential areas identified as “Stabilization” and “Revitalization” on the Residential Neighborhood Categorization Map contained in the Housing Element. Many of the remaining parcels in the area are currently vacant. Due to those conditions, the North Federal Highway Corridor is hereby identified as a blighted area. The North Federal Highway Redevelopment Plan was approved by City Commission on March 16, 1999. The Plan identified the need for limited rezonings and LDR amendments, along with improvements necessary to accomplish certain redevelopment goals. Future development in the area must be in accordance with the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. In FY 2008/09 2010/11, the Planning & Zoning department shall evaluate the need for establishing design guidelines for the corridor. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. 13) Location: Future Land Use Element -Pg. FL-31, Policy C-1.12 (Redevelopment Plan) Policy C-1.12 The following pertains to the South Federal Highway area, south of Linton Boulevard. In FY 2008/09, the City’s Planning & Zoning Department shall review existing land uses in this area and shall create a redevelopment plan, overlay district or other development tool to promote and guide future redevelopment of the area. Change: REVISION ( 7 ) Policy C-1.12 The following pertains to the South Federal Highway area, south of Linton Boulevard. In FY 2008/09 2010/11, the City’s Planning & Zoning Department shall review existing land uses in this area and shall create a redevelopment plan, overlay district or other development tool to promote and guide future redevelopment of the area. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. 14) Location: Future Land Use Element -Pg. FL-31, Policy C-1.13 (Redevelopment Plan) Policy C-1.13 The following pertains to the Linton Boulevard area, from I-95 east to Federal Highway. In FY 2008/09, the City’s Planning & Zoning Department shall review existing land uses in this area and shall create a redevelopment plan, overlay district or other development tool to promote and guide future redevelopment of the area. Change: REVISION Policy C-1.13 The following pertains to the Linton Boulevard area, from I-95 east to Federal Highway. In FY 2008/09 2010/11, the City’s Planning & Zoning Department shall review existing land uses in this area and shall create a redevelopment plan, overlay district or other development tool to promote and guide future redevelopment of the area. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. 15) Location: Housing Element -Pg. HO-38, Policy B-3.3 (Group Homes and Foster Care) Policy B-3.3 The City shall review its Land Development Regulations for consistency with Chapter 419, FS, regarding the location of group homes and foster care facilities. This review will be completed in FY 08/09. Change: DELETION Comment: This Policy is being eliminated since it has been completed. ( 8 ) 16) Location: Transportation Element -Pg. TR-37, Policy A-1.8 (Downtown Roundabout) Policy A-1.8 In FY 2008/09, the city shall investigate the feasibility of implementing an impact fee or other system for assessment of new development to fund operation of the downtown roundabout shuttle service. Change: REVISION Policy A-1.8 In FY 2008/09 2010/11, the city shall investigate the feasibility of implementing an impact fee or other system for assessment of new development to fund operation of the downtown roundabout shuttle service. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. 17) Location: Transportation Element -Pg. TR-40, Objective A-8 (Green Linkages) Objective A-8 In FY 2008/09, a program shall be developed to support the City character by encouraging street trees for green linkages. Change: REVISION Objective A-8 In FY 2008/09 2010/11, a program shall be developed to support the City character by encouraging street trees for green linkages. Comment: This Objective is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. 18) Location: Transportation Element -Pg. TR-43, Policy D-2.4 (Bicycle Network) Policy D-2.4 By FY 2009/10, the City shall prepare and adopt a bicycle network plan for the city. Change: REVISION Policy D-2.4 By FY 2009/10 2011/12, the City shall prepare and adopt a bicycle network plan for the city. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. ( 9 ) 19) Location: Transportation Element -Pg. TR-44, Policy D-3.1 (TDM) Policy D-3.1 In cooperation with the Florida Department of Transportation regional Commuter Assistance Program, the City shall perform and analyze transportation surveys to determine the issues and needs for employer based TDM activities, including but not limited to ride sharing, van pooling, and flexible work hours. These activities shall be completed in FY 09/10. Change: REVISION Policy D-3.1 In cooperation with the Florida Department of Transportation regional Commuter Assistance Program, the City shall perform and analyze transportation surveys to determine the issues and needs for employer based TDM activities, including but not limited to ride sharing, van pooling, and flexible work hours. These activities shall be completed in FY 09/10 2010/11. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. 20) Location: Transportation Element -Pg. TR-44, Policy D-3.5 (Shuttle) Policy D-3.5 The City and the CRA shall continue to monitor the feasibility of the existing in-town shuttle system providing service between Tri-Rail and the beach with headways of 20-30 minutes. In FY 2008/09, the City shall determine the operational feasibility and grant funding requirements necessary to provide shuttle service to meet and greet all trains at the station. Change: REVISION Policy D-3.5 The City and the CRA shall continue to monitor the feasibility of the existing in-town shuttle system providing service between Tri-Rail and the beach with headways of 20-30 minutes. In FY 2008/09 2010/11, the City shall determine the operational feasibility and grant funding requirements necessary to provide shuttle service to meet and greet all trains at the station. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task. ( 10 ) PRIVATELY-INITIATED TEXT CHANGES: 21) Location: Future Land Use Element. Pg. FL-39, Description of the General Commercial FLUM designation. General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special overlay district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses, except for mixed-use development within the Four Corners Overlay District, where the nonresidential component is limited to an FAR of 2.0, and except within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where the nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.75. Residential uses may comprise up to 15% of the total floor area of the General Commercial Land Use designation. Residential uses are permitted either in conjunction with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use subject to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre, except in Redevelopment Area #6 (Lindell/Federal Highway) where residential densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 16 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval and the criteria outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for that area and within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where residential densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 22 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. Areas with the General Commercial designation, located within a workforce housing overlay district, may also exceed 12 units per acre up to a maximum of 30 units per acre within the Four Corners Overlay District and 18 units per acre within the infill workforce housing area, by obtaining density bonuses through the provision of workforce housing units. Change: REVISION General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special overlay district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses, except as indicated within the following overlay districts: for mixed-use development within the Four Corners Overlay District, where the nonresidential component is limited to an FAR of 2.0, and except within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where the nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.75. • Four Corners Overlay District -For mixed-use development within this overlay district, the nonresidential component is limited to an FAR of 2.0 • Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District -Nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.75 • Lintco Development Overlay District -Nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.36. ( 11 ) Residential uses may comprise up to 15% of the total floor area of the General Commercial Land Use designation. Residential uses are permitted either in conjunction with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use subject to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre, except in Redevelopment Area #6 (Lindell/Federal Highway) where residential densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 16 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval and the criteria outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for that area and within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where residential densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 22 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. Areas with the General Commercial designation, located within a workforce housing overlay district, may also exceed 12 units per acre up to a maximum of 30 units per acre within the Four Corners Overlay District and 18 units per acre within the infill workforce housing area, by obtaining density bonuses through the provision of workforce housing units. Comment: The 7.08 acres within the proposed Lintco Development overlay district has a current Future Land Use designation of MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/acre). A Future Land Use Map amendment (See Support Document #19) is being processed concurrently to change the FLUM designation to GC (General Commercial). The overlay district is being created to allow mixed-use development on the property at a nonresidential intensity lower than that currently allowed within the GC designation. The maximum intensity for nonresidential uses within the overlay district will be set at an FAR of 0.36. The maximum density for residential development will remain unchanged at 12 du.ac. Existing and proposed colored Future Land Use Maps, which also include the overlay district, are attached as Support Document #13 The concurrency analysis assumes development of the entire property within the overlay district at the maximum intensity allowed under the amended description for the General Commercial designation. As shown on the following table, development under this provision would result in the addition of nonresidential development potential where none now exists. The maximum development potential with the proposed amendment would be a mixed-use project with residential development at 12 units per acre and retail development at a maximum FAR of 0.36. A comparative analysis of the maximum development potential of the property has been provided below. Table 1: Maximum Development Potential Lintco Development Overlay District EXISTING PROPOSED FLUM (acres) Maximum Development Potential FLUM (acres) Maximum Mixed Use Development Potential MD (7.08 acres) 85 Multi-Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) GC (7.08 acres) Mixed-Use 85 Multi-Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 111,026 SF Retail (FAR 0.36) ( 12 ) Traffic: An analysis of the traffic impacts associated with the maximum development potential of a mixed-use development on the property was conducted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The entire Kimley-Horn Traffic Impact Analysis is attached as Support Document #14. As shown on the following table from the report, the new maximum land use mix will represent a net increase in potential traffic volumes. Analyses were conducted for each of the three planning horizons–existing (2009), short-term (2015) and long-term (2035). In the Conclusion Section on page 17 of the Report, the consultant indicates that “based on the analyses within this study, the future land use map amendment is expected to continue to allow the significantly impacted roadways to operate acceptably upon build-out of the development site.” Table 2: Trip Generation Comparison -Maximum Intensity Lintco Development Overlay District ( 13 ) Water & Sewer: Water treatment is provided by the City of Delray Beach at the Water Treatment Plant. The geographic service area coincides with the Planning Area plus service provided to the Town of Gulf Stream through contract as a bulk customer. The service area encompasses approximately 18 square miles. The treatment plant, with a capacity of 28 million gallons per day, was constructed in 1972 and has a programmed life of 50 years (2022). The water supply is provided from 30 active wells in four wellfields, yielding a total design capacity of 37.2 mgd. The City’s consumptive use permit currently limits the annual withdraw rate to 6.937 billion gallons which equates to an average of 19 mgd. Water demand projections for the City’s Water Service Area were calculated based on the City’s population projections multiplied by the projected per capita demands. Potable water demand projections, credits for the use of reclaimed water and the total excess/deficit for the years 2010 through 2030 are given in the following table. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum development potential with the FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36. Potable Water Demand Projections Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Service Area Population 69,335 74,504 81,114 82,233 82,556 Per Capita Use (gpd) 240 240 240 240 240 Avg. Daily Demand (MG) 16.64 17.88 19.47 19.74 19.81 Permit Base Condition (MGD) 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 Excess/(Deficit) (MGD) 2.36 1.12 (0.47) (0.74) (0.81) Alternative sources Reclaimed Water Credits for Ground Water Demand Removal 1.08 1.895 1.895 1.895 1.895 Potable demand removal 0.39 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Excess/Deficit 3.83 3.85 2.27 2.00 1.92 Notes: 1. Population projections based on Palm Beach County 2007 Population Allocation Model using March 2008 BEBR Population Projections. 2. Per capita use assumes a 10% reduction from current permitted values achieved through conservation. 3. Permit base condition as provided by SFWMD per ground water availability rule. Wastewater from the City is treated at the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWWTP), which is managed by the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board, established in 1974 through an agreement between the cities of Delray Beach and Boynton Beach. The SCRWWTP has the capacity to provide up to 24 mgd of reclaimed-quality water. In 2003, the City developed a Reclaimed Water Master Plan, which identified 16 areas for reclaimed water application. The City is currently using reclaimed water to irrigate several golf courses and is installing additional transmission lines to serve other large users. Through the use of reclaimed water, the City’s 20-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan indicates ( 14 ) that water supply facilities are planned and will be available to meet the future growth and water demands of the City of Delray Beach through the year 2030. The wastewater treatment plant was constructed in 1979, with a programmed life of 50 years (2029). Ultimate disposal was originally by ocean discharge of secondary effluent and land spreading of sludge. In late 2008, deep well injection replaced the ocean discharge except for emergency situations and DEP permitted exceptions. Also in late 2008, with completion of the Palm Beach County Biosolids Pelletization facility, land spreading of sludge is longer being used. The design capacity of the treatment plant, established by its secondary treatment capacity, is 24 mgd. This capacity is shared equally between Boynton Beach and Delray Beach. The current plant has adequate capacity to service the City’s projected population beyond the year 2025. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate wastewater treatment capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum development potential with the FLUM amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36. Since adequate capacity is available in the City’s water and wastewater systems to meet the increased demand, the proposed FLUM amendment will not impact the level of service standard for these facilities. Drainage: The adopted LOS standards for drainage is the SFWMD standard of retention of the first one inch of runoff or 2.5 inches of water storage times the percentage of impervious area. Local and City-wide drainage deficiencies are identified in the Stormwater Master Plan (Kimley-Horn, 2000). The City has programmed projects to correct the deficiencies identified in this report and achieve the Level of Service standard. Public Facilities Element Objective E-1 states: A capital improvement program directed specifically to storm drainage and runoff management has been adopted by the City Commission, and capital projects, as identified in that program, shall be implemented with funding to come from the Stormwater Utility Fee. Drainage is reviewed during the site plan application process for individual projects. Within this area of the City, drainage is usually accommodated on site via exfiltration trench systems or swale retention areas. There are no problems anticipated with obtaining South Florida Water Management District permits within the area and any additional impacts caused by increased impervious area will not affect the level of service standard. Parks & Recreation The Open Space and Recreation Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan indicates in its conclusion that “The City will have sufficient recreation facilities at build-out to meet the adopted standards.” The LOS standard for open space and recreation in the city is 3 acres per 1,000 residents. The amount of land currently provided in activity based recreation facilities, the municipal beaches, and the two public golf courses, establishes ( 15 ) a level of service of 6.2 acres per 1,000 residents (2007), far exceeding the general guideline. A park impact fee is collected to offset any impacts that new development may have on the City’s recreational facilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, a park impact fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of a building permit for each residential unit. Since there is no net increase in the residential development potential on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36, this level of service standard is not affected. Education (School Concurrency): Since there is no net increase in the residential development potential on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36, this level of service standard is not affected. Solid Waste: As shown on the following table, with the proposed amendment, the development of the property would result in a net increase of 566 tons per year in solid waste generation. In its annual capacity letter, dated January 6, 2010, the Solid Waste Authority indicates that it has sufficient capacity for concurrency management and comprehensive planning purposes. As stated in the letter, “Capacity is available for both the coming year, and the five and ten year planning periods specified in 9J-5-005(4).” Based on population projections, waste generation rate projections, waste reduction, and recycling, the Solid Waste Authority forecasts that capacity will be available at the existing landfill through approximately the year 2030. The Board of the Solid Waste Authority has authorized the initial design and permitting efforts to develop a new landfill on 1,600 acres owned by the authority. The capacity of this new landfill would extend the life of the solid waste system beyond the year 2043 or later. Table 3: Solid Waste Generation Lintco Development Overlay District Existing Maximum Development Potential Proposed Mixed-Use Maximum Development Potential 85 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 44.2 tons/yr 111,026 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 566 tons/year 85 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 44.2 tons/yr 22) Location: Future Land Use Element. Pg. FL-39, Description of the General Commercial FLUM designation. General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special overlay district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses, except for mixed-use development within the ( 16 ) Four Corners Overlay District, where the nonresidential component is limited to an FAR of 2.0, and except within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where the nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.75. Residential uses may comprise up to 15% of the total floor area of the General Commercial Land Use designation. Residential uses are permitted either in conjunction with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use subject to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre, except in Redevelopment Area #6 (Lindell/Federal Highway) where residential densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 16 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval and the criteria outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for that area and within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where residential densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 22 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. Areas with the General Commercial designation, located within a workforce housing overlay district, may also exceed 12 units per acre up to a maximum of 30 units per acre within the Four Corners Overlay District and 18 units per acre within the infill workforce housing area, by obtaining density bonuses through the provision of workforce housing units. Change: REVISION General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special overlay district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses, except as indicated within the following overlay districts: for mixed-use development within the Four Corners Overlay District, where the nonresidential component is limited to an FAR of 2.0, and except within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where the nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.75. • Four Corners Overlay District -For mixed-use development within this overlay district, the nonresidential component is limited to an FAR of 2.0 • Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District -Nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.75 • Waterford Overlay District -Nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 1.32. Residential uses may comprise up to 15% of the total floor area of the General Commercial Land Use designation. Residential uses are permitted either in conjunction with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use subject to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre, except in Redevelopment Area #6 (Lindell/Federal Highway) where residential densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 16 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval and the criteria outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for that area and within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where residential densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 22 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. Areas with the General Commercial designation, located within a workforce housing overlay district, may also exceed 12 units per acre up to a maximum of 30 units per acre within the Four ( 17 ) Corners Overlay District and 18 units per acre within the infill workforce housing area, by obtaining density bonuses through the provision of workforce housing units. Comment: The 4.58 acres within the proposed Waterford Development overlay district has a current Future Land Use designation of TRN (Transitional). A Future Land Use Map amendment (See Support Document #21) is being processed concurrently to change the FLUM designation to GC (General Commercial). The overlay district is being created to allow mixed-use development on the property at a nonresidential intensity lower than that currently allowed within the GC designation. The maximum intensity for nonresidential uses within the overlay district will be set at an FAR of 1.32. The maximum density for residential development will remain unchanged at 12 du.ac. Existing and proposed colored Future Land Use Maps, which also include the overlay district, are attached as Support Document #15. The concurrency analysis assumes development of the entire property within the overlay district at the maximum intensity allowed under the amended description for the General Commercial designation. As shown on the following table, development under this provision would result in an increase of nonresidential development potential from the current 199,505 square feet to 263,346 square feet. The maximum residential density will remain the same at 12 du/ac. The maximum development potential with the proposed amendment would be a mixeduse project with residential development at 12 units per acre and retail development at a maximum FAR of 1.32 as indicated above. A comparative analysis of the maximum development potential of the property has been provided below. Table 1: Maximum Development Potential Waterford Park – Parcel “B” EXISTING PROPOSED FLUM (acres) Maximum Development Potential FLUM (acres) Maximum Mixed Use Development Potential TRN (4.58 acres) Mixed-Use 55 Multi-Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 199,505 SF Retail (FAR 1.0) GC (4.58 acres) Mixed-Use 55 Multi-Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 263,346 SF Retail (FAR 1.32) Traffic: An analysis of the traffic impacts associated with the maximum development potential of a mixed-use development on the property was conducted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The entire Kimley-Horn Traffic Impact Analysis is attached as Support Document #16. As shown on Table 2 below, the new maximum land use mix will represent a net increase in potential traffic volumes. Table 2 indicates a net new external trip increase of 1,772 ADT (Average Daily Traffic), with 51 AM peak hour trips and 196 PM peak hour trips with the proposed 1.32 FAR (Floor Area Ratio). Kimley-Horn and Associates, indicated in its report that “based on the analyses within this study, the future land use map amendment is expected to continue to allow the significantly impacted roadways to operate acceptably upon build-out of the development site.” ( 18 ) Table 2: Trip Generation Comparison -Maximum Intensity Waterford Park ( 19 ) Water & Sewer: Water treatment is provided by the City of Delray Beach at the Water Treatment Plant. The geographic service area coincides with the Planning Area plus service provided to the Town of Gulf Stream through contract as a bulk customer. The service area encompasses approximately 18 square miles. The treatment plant, with a capacity of 28 million gallons per day, was constructed in 1972 and has a programmed life of 50 years (2022). The water supply is provided from 30 active wells in four wellfields, yielding a total design capacity of 37.2 mgd. The City’s consumptive use permit currently limits the annual withdraw rate to 6.937 billion gallons which equates to an average of 19 mgd (million gallons per day). Water demand projections for the City’s Water Service Area were calculated based on the City’s population projections multiplied by the projected per capita demands. Potable water demand projections, credits for the use of reclaimed water and the total excess/deficit for the years 2010 through 2030 are given in the following table. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum development potential with the FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR (Floor Area Ratio) to 1.32. Potable Water Demand Projections Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Service Area Population 69,335 74,504 81,114 82,233 82,556 Per Capita Use (gpd) 240 240 240 240 240 Avg. Daily Demand (MG) 16.64 17.88 19.47 19.74 19.81 Permit Base Condition (MGD) 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 Excess/(Deficit) (MGD) 2.36 1.12 (0.47) (0.74) (0.81) Alternative sources Reclaimed Water Credits for Ground Water Demand Removal 1.08 1.895 1.895 1.895 1.895 Potable demand removal 0.39 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Excess/Deficit 3.83 3.85 2.27 2.00 1.92 Notes: 1. Population projections based on Palm Beach County 2007 Population Allocation Model using March 2008 BEBR Population Projections. 2. Per capita use assumes a 10% reduction from current permitted values achieved through conservation. 3. Permit base condition as provided by SFWMD per ground water availability rule. Wastewater from the City is treated at the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWWTP), which is managed by the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board, established in 1974 through an agreement between the cities of Delray Beach and Boynton Beach. The SCRWWTP has the capacity to provide up to 24 mgd of reclaimed-quality water. In 2003, the City developed a Reclaimed Water Master Plan, which identified 16 areas for reclaimed water application. The City is currently using reclaimed water to irrigate several golf courses and is installing additional transmission lines to serve other large users. Through the ( 20 ) use of reclaimed water, the City’s 20-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan indicates that water supply facilities are planned and will be available to meet the future growth and water demands of the City of Delray Beach through the year 2030. The wastewater treatment plant was constructed in 1979, with a programmed life of 50 years (2029). Ultimate disposal was originally by ocean discharge of secondary effluent and land spreading of sludge. In late 2008, deep well injection replaced the ocean discharge except for emergency situations and DEP permitted exceptions. Also in late 2008, with completion of the Palm Beach County Biosolids Pelletization facility, land spreading of sludge is longer being used. The design capacity of the treatment plant, established by its secondary treatment capacity, is 24 mgd. This capacity is shared equally between Boynton Beach and Delray Beach. The current plant has adequate capacity to service the City’s projected population beyond the year 2025. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate wastewater treatment capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum development potential with the FLUM amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 1.32. Since adequate capacity is available in the City’s water and wastewater systems to meet the increased demand, the proposed FLUM amendment will not impact the level of service standard for these facilities. Drainage: The adopted LOS standard for drainage is the SFWMD standard of retention of the first one inch of runoff or 2.5 inches of water storage times the percentage of impervious area. Drainage is reviewed during the site plan application process for individual projects. Within this area of the City, drainage is usually accommodated on site via exfiltration trench systems or swale retention areas. There are no problems anticipated with obtaining South Florida Water Management District permits within the area and any additional impacts caused by increased impervious area will not affect the level of service standard. Parks & Recreation The Open Space and Recreation Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan indicates in its conclusion that “The City will have sufficient recreation facilities at build-out to meet the adopted standards.” The LOS standard for open space and recreation in the city is 3 acres per 1,000 residents. The amount of land currently provided in activity based recreation facilities, the municipal beaches, and the two public golf courses, establishes a level of service of 6.2 acres per 1,000 residents (2007), far exceeding the general guideline. A park impact fee is collected to offset any impacts that new development may have on the City’s recreational facilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, a park impact fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of a building permit for each residential unit. Since there is no net increase in the residential development potential on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment which ( 21 ) limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 1.32, this level of service standard is not affected. Education (School Concurrency): Since there is no net increase in the residential development potential (12 units per acre – 55 total allowed under each designation) on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 1.32, this level of service standard is not affected. Solid Waste: As shown on the following table, with the proposed amendment, the development of the property would result in a net increase of 326 tons per year in solid waste generation. In its annual capacity letter, dated January 6, 2010, the Solid Waste Authority indicates that it has sufficient capacity for concurrency management and comprehensive planning purposes. As stated in the letter, “Capacity is available for both the coming year, and the five and ten year planning periods specified in 9J-5-005(4).” Based on population projections, waste generation rate projections, waste reduction, and recycling, the Solid Waste Authority forecasts that capacity will be available at the existing landfill through approximately the year 2030. The Board of the Solid Waste Authority has authorized the initial design and permitting efforts to develop a new landfill on 1,600 acres owned by the authority. The capacity of this new landfill would extend the life of the solid waste system beyond the year 2043 or later. Table 3: Solid Waste Generation Waterford Overlay District Existing Maximum Development Potential Proposed Mixed-Use Maximum Development Potential 199,505 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 1,017 tons/year 55 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 28.6 tons/yr 263,346 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 1,343 tons/year 55 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 28.6 tons/yr ( 22 ) AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP CITY-INITIATED FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT: 1. Future Land Use Map amendment to assign a City Future Land Use Map designation concurrently with the annexation of “The Marketplace of Delray”, containing approximately 30.26 acres of property located at the northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail. The current County Land Use Map designation is CH/8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential of 8 units per acre) and the proposed City designation is GC (General Commercial). See Support Document #17 – Marketplace at Delray – Annexation, FLUM Amendment and Rezoning staff report. Existing and proposed colored Future Land Use Maps are attached as Support Document #18. PRIVATELY-INITIATED FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS: 2. Future Land Use Map amendment for the approximately 7.08 acre Lintco property located on the north side of Linton Boulevard, west of SW 4th Avenue, from MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/acre) to GC (General Commercial). See Support Document #19 – Lintco Development – FLUM Amendment and Rezoning staff report. Existing and proposed colored Future Land Use Maps are attached as Support Document #13. 3. Future Land Use Map amendment for a 4.58 acre parcel located within Waterford, east of I-95, south of Linton Boulevard, from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial). See Support Document #20 – Waterford – FLUM Amendment staff report. Existing and proposed colored Future Land Use Maps are attached as Support Document #15. s:\planning & zoning\longrange\comp\amend 10-1\adoption\10-1 maindoc adopt.doc COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #1 Capital Improvement Element Existing Table CI-CIP, Five Year Capital Improvements Schedule For Projects > $25,000 SD #1 PROJECT & FUND FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 RECREATION IMPACT FEE Atlantic Dunes Exotic Species Repl 0 0 160,000 0 0 NW 1st Avenue Park 78,800 0 0 0 0 Oakmont Park Improvements 78,800 0 0 0 0 TOTALS: $157,600 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 BEAUTIFICATION TRUST FUND Computerized Irrigation Syst-Pks Medians 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 TOTALS: $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND Hope III Acquisitions 17,330 17,330 0 0 0 Ship Program-State Grant 568,630 551,571 535,024 518,973 503,404 Western Settlers' Grant Program 55,000 0 0 0 0 Beacon Ctr -Village Program 777,310 816,176 856,984 899,833 944,825 Disaster Recovery Initiative 0 800,000 0 0 0 Planning Administration 99,960 102,959 106,042 109,223 112,499 Housing Rehab -Federal Grant 252,630 235,440 235,440 235,440 235,440 Unsafe Bldgs, Land Acqu, Bike Paths, Neighborhood Resources 137,540 150,000 163,430 143,469 125,000 Grants and Aids -Federal Grant -Economic Development 86,500 19,564 0 0 0 Neighborhood Housing 182,980 185,710 186,000 186,000 185,296 TOTALS $2,177,880 $2,878,750 $2,082,920 $2,092,938 $2,106,464 BEACH RESTORATION FUND Beach Renourishment-Fill Placement 0 0 0 7,250,000 0 Beach Tilling 0 0 0 0 15,130 Construction Surveys 46,690 47,860 49,770 51,760 53,840 Environmental Construction 0 0 265,000 265,000 68,500 Final and Construction Engineering 0 0 93,000 70,000 0 Final Engineering/Bid and Negotiation 0 0 23,500 0 0 Other Expenses 7,050 7,050 7,050 7,050 7,050 Sea Turtles Monitoring 38,750 38,750 38,750 40,300 41,510 Update Geotech/Preliminary Study 428,500 0 0 0 0 Yearly replacement (snow fence) 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 TOTALS: $528,990 $101,660 $485,070 $7,692,110 $194,030 GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Atlantic Dunes Boardwalk completion 0 80,000 0 0 0 Bleachers-Community Center-Replace 0 0 55,000 0 0 Block 20 Alley Improvements 110,000 0 0 0 0 Block 32 Alley Improvements 0 0 130,000 0 0 Building Maintenance Annual Program 151,800 235,800 185,800 235,800 190,800 Bus Shelters (12 shelter throughout city) 322,000 0 0 0 0 Carpet Replacement -Police Dept 0 65,000 0 0 0 City Hall A/C System Upgrade 50,000 0 0 0 0 Clay Court Rehab-Tennis Center 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Computers and Related Equipment-Replacement 110,000 110,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Disk Storage Space Increase-Finance/IT 60,000 0 0 0 0 Dixie Hwy-US 1 Connector (NE 22nd Lane-constr) 150,000 0 0 0 0 East Atlantic Avenue -resurfacing 104,000 0 0 0 0 Exchange Archiving Software-Finance/It 0 63,000 0 0 0 Family Recreation & Fitness Center Furniture & Fixtures 0 283,910 0 0 0 Family Recreation & Fitness Center-constr facility 0 11,937,580 0 0 0 Federal Highway Beautification-Phase 1 360,000 2,400,000 0 0 0 Federal Highway Beautification-Phase 2 0 0 330,000 3,300,000 0 Federal Highway Beautification-Phase 3 0 0 0 225,000 1,500,000 Fire Rescue Training Center 0 0 370,000 580,000 75,000 Fire Sprinkler & Alarm System -80 Depot Avenue-Fire 0 40,000 0 0 0 Fire Station #1 Entry and Courtyard Improvements 0 0 0 0 372,600 Fire-Station #1 Hardening Study/Const 0 0 60,000 330,000 0 Gateway Mini Parks -W Atlantic Ave-I95/SW/NW 12th Ave 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 Generator Upgrade-Fire Rescue Headquarters 0 0 0 15,000 250,000 In-Car Audio Visual Cameras-Police Department 0 150,000 150,000 150,000 90,000 Internal Building Data Cabling-Replace 42,500 0 0 0 0 Laptop Computers-Police Dept-Replace 0 395,250 170,000 0 0 Livescan Software System-Police Department 35,000 0 0 0 0 Martin Luther King Drive Improvements 296,000 0 0 0 0 Mobile Vehicle Laptops-Fire-Rescue Vehicle 0 0 112,500 112,500 0 Mobile Vehicular Radio Repeaters-Fire 0 125,000 50,000 50,000 0 Motorola 3.0 Radio System-Replacement 0 6,000,000 0 0 0 Naviline Software-Finance/IT (Window based HTE) 0 170,000 0 0 0 NE 8th Ave pavement -North of Bond Way 0 0 0 0 86,000 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 CI-26 PROJECT & FUND FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 Neighborhood Enhancements/Improvements 0 0 0 0 246,000 Office Expansion/Parks Maintenance 0 0 105,000 0 0 Old School Square-Window Replacement 647,400 0 0 0 0 Omnitrak Latent work station equip-Police Dept 0 114,000 0 0 0 Osceola Park Improvements 394,250 394,250 0 0 0 Parking Lot Refurbish-Police Department 0 0 0 0 100,000 Pineapple Grove Sidewalks 0 0 173,000 0 0 Pocket Parks-Construction 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 Police Dept -Lobby Renovation 0 0 0 0 49,500 Police Dept -Repl Van's platform 0 0 155,510 0 0 Railroad-Crossing Annual Rehabilitation Program 95,000 96,750 130,000 114,000 115,473 Range Ballistic Backstop-Replacement Police Dept 0 45,000 0 0 0 SE 2nd St -S Swinton Ave to FEC x-ing 0 0 0 344,000 0 Seacrest Blvd-NE 8th St-Gulfstream Blvd-St Reconst 0 0 0 0 417,000 Second Floor addition-outside Evidence Rm 0 0 0 307,500 0 Server Replacement-Software Upgrade 0 550,000 0 0 0 Shade Systems -Pompey Parks 0 0 44,000 0 0 Sidewalks/Bike Paths 0 50,000 50,000 0 110,000 Skid Car for driver training-Police Dept 0 45,000 0 0 0 Software integration Application-Police Dept. 1,197,420 0 0 0 0 Special Events Response Vehicle, new-Fire 0 0 0 0 25,000 Street Light Poles-Replacement 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Street Resurface/Reconstruction-yrly program 75,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 SW 12th Avenue/Auburn Imprv 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 SW 14th Ave -SW 2nd st to SW 1st St & Alleys 453,700 0 0 0 0 SW 1st Ave -SW 1st St to W. Atlantic Avenue 0 0 0 0 449,500 SW 29th St-SW 22nd Avenue Sidewalks 288,000 0 0 0 0 SW 2nd Avenue@West Atlantic Signalization 330,000 0 0 0 0 Teen Center Renovation 0 50,000 0 0 0 Telemetry Installations-City Emergency Generators 0 25,000 0 0 0 Telephone System-Fire-Rescue Facility -Replace 0 0 100,000 0 0 Traffic Calming -Annual Improvements 0 0 0 230,000 Training Room Remodel-Police Dept 0 0 55,000 0 0 Veterans Park Master Plan 45,000 0 0 0 0 VMware Server Replacement 0 0 0 125,000 0 TOTALS: $8,177,070 $23,700,540 $2,850,810 $6,363,800 $4,781,873 CITY MARINA FUND Pump Out Station 44,420 0 0 0 0 TOTALS: $44,420 $0 $0 $0 $0 WATER/SEWER NEW CAPITAL OUTLAY ESD-Compound Screen Wall 0 125,000 0 0 0 Greenbriar Dr Sewer-new sanitary sewer sys 0 269,000 0 0 0 Lab Information Mgmt System for ESD Lab 27,000 0 0 0 0 Reclaimed Water Distribution/Customer Connection 0 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Reclaimed Water Master Plan 0 0 0 0 0 Reclaimed Water Transmission System 2,100,000 1,304,294 2,350,000 2,350,000 2,327,883 Sludge Thickener (new) 800,000 0 0 0 0 Telephone System -new 0 125,000 0 0 0 TOTALS: $2,927,000 $1,973,294 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,477,883 WATER/SEWER RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT FUND Block 32 Water Main Improvements 0 0 116,300 0 0 Computer Equipment annual replacement 25,500 0 0 0 0 Delray Shores water main upgrade 0 0 0 768,450 768,450 Eldorado Lane & Sunshine Dr.-Water Main upgrades 0 0 0 490,650 Elevated Storage Tank Maintenance 17,000 17,000 17,000 19,000 19,000 Federal Highway Beautification -Phase 3 0 0 0 397,000 Federal Highway Beautification-Phase 1 15,000 100,000 0 0 0 Federal Highway Beautification-Phase 2 0 0 388,500 0 Hydrant Maintenance 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 Internal Building Data Cabling-Replace 42,500 0 0 0 0 Laboratory Chromatography Unit Repl 55,000 0 0 0 0 Lake Drive Water main upgrades 0 216,000 0 0 0 Lift Station Rehabilitation #107,85,94A,26A 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 Lift Station Upgrades along Congress Ave 45,000 45,000 124,000 0 0 Lowson Blvd Force Main Replacement 0 0 310,000 0 0 NE 2nd Ave Water Main Repl 0 0 0 0 279,000 NE 3rd Aven Water Main Upgrade 0 0 86,000 0 0 NE 8th Avenue -North of Bond Way-extend Wtr Main 0 0 0 0 86,000 NE 8th Avenue-Water Main Upgrade 386,850 0 0 0 0 North Lake Ida Area-wtr main upgrade 0 469,334 235,166 0 0 CI-27 PROJECT & FUND FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 NW 4th & NW 4th Avenue-wtr main upgrade 0 0 593,000 0 0 Osceola Park 100,000 850,000 0 0 0 Production Well Rehabilitation 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Sanitary Sewer Main Rehabilitation 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Seacrest Blvd-NE 8th St Gulfstream Blvd-Wtr Main 0 0 0 0 35,000 SW 10th Ave -SW 2nd St to W Atlantic Ave 0 0 0 0 403,000 SW 12 & 13 Avenue Water Main 350,000 0 0 0 0 SW 1st AV & SE 4th St to SE 2nd St main upgrade 0 0 0 238,600 0 SW 1st AV & SW 4th St-wtr main upgrade 0 0 93,000 0 0 SW 3rd St, SW 3rd Ave,SW 6th Ave wtr main upgrade 0 435,000 435,000 0 0 SW 6th Street Water Main 93,000 0 0 0 0 SW14th Ave-Wtr Main upgrade 0 0 0 0 114,900 Transfer to Garage Fund (Hoist Replacement) 40,000 0 0 0 0 Utility Asst Management/Wrk Order System 150,000 0 0 0 0 Water Main Leak Repairs 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Water Meter Replacement 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Water Service Relocations 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Water Valve Replacement 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 Wet Well Rehabilitation of Bldg Lift Station 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 WTP -Vacuum drum Filter Rehabilation 215,000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS: $2,280,850 $2,878,334 $2,755,466 $2,626,200 $2,823,350 MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE Machinery/Equipment( <$25,000) 69,500 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 Other Improvements(<$25,000) 22,800 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Debt Service 413,980 409,550 409,220 406,260 409,750 Debt Service-Cart Lease 35,450 35,450 8,900 0 0 TOTALS: $541,730 $540,000 $518,120 $511,260 $519,750 LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE Debt Service-Bonds 249,900 220,140 223,720 223,291 225,390 Debt Service-Cart Lease 26,180 31,610 31,610 7,900 0 LakeView Green Renovation Project 0 0 0 0 0 Other Machinery & Equipment (<$25,000) 5,400 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 TOTALS: $281,480 $256,750 $260,330 $236,191 $230,390 STORMWATER UTILITY Allen Avenue Drainage 98,000 0 0 0 0 Block 32 Alley-Drainage System 0 0 86,000 0 0 Dotteral Road-Audubon Blvd 0 0 0 0 86,000 Federal Highway Phase 1 62,000 410,000 0 0 0 Federal Highway Phase 2 0 0 0 431,000 0 Federal Highway Phase 3 0 0 0 0 454,000 General Storm Water Repairs 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Lowson @Homewood Roundabout 0 0 0 0 150,000 NE 8th Avenue from N of Bond way 0 0 0 0 86,000 S Swinton Ave @SW/SE 4th St. 0 0 0 186,500 0 SE 2nd Street -S Swinton Avenue to FEC x-ing 0 0 0 230,000 0 Seacrest Blvd-NE 8th to Gulfstream Blvd Drainage 0 0 0 0 112,500 Storm Water Vac Con Truck 300,000 0 0 0 0 SW 14th Ave -SW 2nd St to SW 1st St Drainage 425,000 0 0 0 0 SW 1st Ave -SW 1st St to W Atlantic Ave Drainage 0 0 0 0 230,000 TOTALS: $965,000 $490,000 $166,000 $927,500 $1,198,500 CENTRAL GARAGE FUND Capital <$25,000 $44,800 0 0 0 0 Fire Apparatus Maint. Building 0 75,000 0 0 0 Fire Apparatus Replace Brush Truck 0 0 0 303,800 0 Fire Apparatus Replace Pumpers 0 0 559,800 0 0 Fire-ALS Rescue Replace 0 243,900 268,900 282,400 296,520 Hoist Replacement on Truck 420 40,000 0 0 0 0 Fire Engine Repl -2002 Pierce 1,288,270 0 0 0 0 Police Dept. -Mobile Command Vehicle 0 245,680 0 0 0 Vehicle Replacement 762,000 784,860 850,000 1,125,000 1,150,000 Vehicle Restoration 70,000 70,500 74,025 77,730 81,620 TOTALS: $2,205,070 $1,419,940 $1,752,725 $1,788,930 $1,528,140 CI-28 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #2 Capital Improvement Element Updated Table CI-CIP, Five Year Capital Improvements Schedule For Projects > $25,000 SD #2 Updated 5-Year CIP PROJECT & FUND FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 RECREATION IMPACT FEE Worthing Park Improvements 197,000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS: $197,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 BEAUTIFICATION TRUST FUND Computerized Irrigation System 50,000 50,000 TOTALS: $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES FUND Western Settlers' Grnt Prog 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Curb Apeal 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Neighborhood Stabilization-FED 69,110 0 0 0 0 Neighborhood Stabilization-DCA 600,000 0 0 0 0 Disaster Recovery Initiative 735,910 536,600 0 0 0 Planning Administration 111,790 111,790 111,790 111,790 111,790 Housing Rehab -Federal Grant 334,550 334,550 334,550 334,550 334,550 Unsafe Bldgs/Lnd Acqu/Bike Paths/Neighborhd Resources 89,110 57,530 94,130 94,130 94,130 Grnts/Aids-Fed Grant-Econ Devel 94,000 94,000 94,000 94,000 94,000 Neighborhood Housing 185,200 185,200 185,200 185,200 185,200 TOTALS $2,329,670 $1,429,670 $929,670 $929,670 $929,670 BEACH RESTORATION FUND Beach Tilling 0 0 15,125 15,580 16,050 Final&Constr Engineering 118,000 70,000 0 0 0 Other Expenses 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 Pre/Post Constr Surveys 49,540 51,020 52,550 54,125 55,750 Construction-Pre & Post 153,000 265,000 68,500 0 0 Construction Loan Interest 0 365,000 0 0 0 Renoruish-Fill Placemnt 0 9,000,000 0 0 0 Sea Turtle Monitoring 38,750 40,300 41,510 42,755 44,038 Yearly replacement (snow fence) 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 TOTALS: $373,790 $9,805,820 $192,185 $126,960 $130,338 GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Atl Dunes Nature Trail 0 98,000 0 0 0 Atl Ave St Light Post Rplmnt 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Beach Beautification Plan 0 73,900 73,900 73,900 73,900 Block 32 Alley 130,000 0 0 0 0 Building Maintenance 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 City Hall Chiller Upgrades 50,000 0 0 0 0 Clay Court Rehab-Tennis Center 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Comm Center/Pompey AC 90,000 0 0 0 0 Currie Park Renovation 0 150,000 0 0 0 Downtown Parking Lots/Garage 0 363,700 0 0 0 Family Rec & Fitness Ctr 0 0 4,844,400 0 0 Family Rec & Fitness Ctr-Equip,etc 0 0 292,460 0 0 Fed Hwy Beautification 0 9,950,000 0 0 0 Fire Dept -Defib/Monitor 52,000 52,000 52,000 52,000 0 Fire Dept Sev Unit 0 0 25,000 0 25,000 Fire EMS Billing Software 40,000 0 0 0 0 Fire HQ Generator Upgrade 0 0 265,000 0 0 Fire HQ Hardening 0 0 0 0 394,950 Fire HQ Public Plaza 35,000 225,000 0 0 0 Fire Training Ctr Restoration 25,000 0 0 0 0 Fire Video Conference Server 0 0 30,000 0 0 Fire Zoll Med Autopulse 62,800 0 0 0 0 Fleet Tire Bay Reroof 40,000 0 0 0 0 Hilltopper Stadium Fence 0 0 41,500 0 0 IT-Computer/Equip Repl 62,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 IT-Data Cabling/Switch 0 70,000 0 0 0 IT-Tape Backup System 35,000 0 0 0 0 Little Fenway Park Bldg 300,000 0 0 0 0 Mangrove Boat Ramp 190,000 0 0 0 0 Merritt Park Renovation 0 150,000 0 0 0 Miller Park Shade System 0 0 0 0 86,100 Mobile Vehicle Laptops-Fire 112,500 0 0 0 0 NE 3rd Street Scape 103,500 0 0 0 0 NE 8th Av Paving 0 0 0 0 84,300 Neighborhood Enhancmts 0 230,000 150,000 240,000 240,000 New Financial System 0 700,000 0 0 0 Office Expansion-Parks 0 0 103,500 0 0 Pineapple Grove Sidewalks 0 0 201,275 0 0 Police AED's 0 60,000 80,000 0 0 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 CI-26 Updated 5-Year CIP PROJECT & FUND FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 Police Comp RM Relocate 0 47,000 0 0 0 Police Exterior Painting 30,000 0 0 0 0 Police Fclty/Roof Maint 25,000 0 0 0 0 Police Firing Range Repl 45,000 0 0 0 0 Police In-Car Video System 0 150,000 156,000 150,000 0 Police Motorola Radio 0 0 6,000,000 0 0 Police Stop Sticks 29,900 0 0 0 0 Police Evidence Rm-2nd Flr 0 0 30,350 265,950 0 PoliceOmniTrak Latent Sta 0 114,000 0 0 0 Pompey Prk-Shade System 0 0 66,000 0 0 Pompey Concession Stand 218,500 0 0 0 0 Pompey Pool Redesign 0 356,500 0 0 0 RR X-ing Annual Maint 206,000 107,000 112,300 117,900 123,800 SE 2 St -S Swinton to FEC 0 197,000 0 0 0 Seacrest Bv NE8St Gstream 0 0 0 419,700 0 Sidewalks/Bikepaths 50,000 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 Street Resurf/Reconstr 220,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 225,000 SW 1 Av-SW 1 St to Atl Av 0 0 0 446,500 0 SW 2 St Beautification 370,000 0 0 0 0 Telephone System-Fire 0 0 100,000 0 0 Tennis Center Storage Bld 0 0 25,000 0 0 Tennis Stadium Bolt R/R 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Tennis Stadium Maint 25,000 0 0 0 0 Traffic Calming 0 0 50,000 50,000 100,000 Veterans Park 0 0 1,023,550 0 0 VMware Server Replacemnt 0 0 320,000 320,000 0 TOTALS: $2,832,200 $13,694,100 $14,592,235 $2,735,950 $1,778,050 CITY MARINA FUND Riverwalk 0 0 0 0 580,000 TOTALS: $0 $0 $0 $0 $580,000 WATER/SEWER NEW CAPITAL OUTLAY Greenbriar Dr. Sewer 0 0 0 280,000 0 Reclaimed Water Customer Connections 200,000 175,000 75,000 225,000 0 Reclaim Water, Area 12A 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 Reclaim Water, Area 12B 0 2,500,000 0 0 0 Reclaim Water Area 6 0 0 2,500,000 0 0 Reclaim Water Area 8 0 0 0 1,500,000 0 Reclaim Water Area 9 0 0 0 300,000 0 Reclaim Water Area 10 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 Reclaim Water Area 14A 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 TOTALS: $1,700,000 $2,675,000 $2,575,000 $2,305,000 $3,000,000 WATER/SEWER RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT FUND Automated Mtr Rdng (AMR) 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 700,000 Block 32 Alley 75,000 0 0 0 0 Bldg LS Wet Well Rehab 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 ESD Computer R/R 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 Congress Ave LS upgrades 0 124,000 0 0 0 Delray Shores W/M 0 0 623,200 749,200 0 Eldorado/Sunshine W M 0 0 0 494,500 0 Elevated Storage Tank Maint. 17,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Fed Hwy Beautification 0 125,000 0 0 0 IT-Data Cabling/Switch 70,000 0 0 0 0 Large Water Mtr Rplcmnts 65,000 65,000 65,000 0 0 Lift Station Rehab 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Lowson Blvd FM 460,000 0 0 0 0 LS100A Capacity Study 60,000 350,000 0 0 0 NE 8th Av Paving 0 0 0 0 50,000 NE 8th Ave WM 0 175,000 0 0 0 NW 4 Av & 3 Av WM 593,400 0 0 0 0 NW 12th Av WM 0 0 0 0 402,500 New Financial System 0 250,000 0 0 0 Osceola Park WM Ph2 773,465 0 0 0 0 Production Well Rehab 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Public Utility Generator Rplcmt 75,000 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 San Swr Main Rehab 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 San Swr Manhole Rehab 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Seacrest Bv-NE8St Gstream 0 0 0 50,000 0 SW 10th Av WM 402,500 0 0 0 0 SW 11th Av WM 0 0 0 0 103,500 SW 1st Av WM 98,900 0 0 0 0 CI-27 Updated 5-Year CIP PROJECT & FUND FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 Utility Asst Mgmt W/O System 0 150,000 0 0 0 Water Main Leak Repairs 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 70,000 Water Meter Replacement 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 450,000 Water Service Relocation 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Water Valve Replacement 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 WTP San Survey Compliance 70,000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS: $3,852,265 $2,925,000 $2,374,200 $3,004,700 $2,412,000 MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE Machinery/Equipment( <$25,000) 68,000 80,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 Other Improvements(<$25,000) 0 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Debt Service 411,490 411,490 411,490 411,490 411,490 Debt Service-Cart Lease 32,460 32,460 32,460 32,460 32,460 TOTALS: $511,950 $548,950 $553,950 $553,950 $553,950 LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE Debt Service-Bonds 223,710 223,291 225,389 163,551 164,619 Debt Service-Cart Lease 0 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Other Machinery & Equipment 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 TOTALS: $243,710 $273,291 $275,389 $213,551 $214,619 STORMWATER UTILITY FUND Auburn Ave Improv 200,000 0 0 0 0 Bay St Pump Sta Imprv 172,500 0 0 0 0 Block 32 Alley 71,000 0 0 0 0 Downtown Parking Lots/Garages 106,300 0 0 0 0 Fed Hwy Beautification 0 676,000 0 0 0 Gen Storm Water Repairs 80,000 0 0 0 0 Gleason Street Drainage 0 0 60,000 0 0 NE 8th Av Paving 0 0 0 0 75,000 New Financial System 0 250,000 0 0 0 Palm Trail Drainage 30,000 0 0 0 0 SE 2 St -Swinton FEC 0 0 240,000 0 0 Seacrest Bv-NE 8St Gstream 0 0 0 162,800 0 Storm Wtr Pmp Stat. Rehab 100,000 70,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 SW 1 Av-SW 1 St /Atlantic Av 0 0 0 232,000 0 SW 2 St Beautification 150,000 0 0 0 0 SW Area Swales 75,000 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 Tropic Blvd Alley Improv 50,000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS: $1,034,800 $996,000 $600,000 $694,800 $375,000 CENTRAL GARAGE FUND ALS Rescue Repl 268,900 282,400 296,600 311,400 0 Brush Truck Replacement 0 303,800 0 0 Fire Apparatus Replace-Pumpers 559,800 0 0 0 0 Police Mobile Command Veh 0 550,000 0 0 0 TV Truck Repl -ESD 0 131,000 0 0 0 Sewer Van Con Repl 306,000 0 0 0 0 Vehicle Replacement -2011 850,000 855,000 860,000 865,000 870,000 Vehicle Restoration -2011 70,500 70,600 70,700 70,800 70,900 Police-VIN Platform Replacement 0 0 155,600 TOTALS: $2,055,200 $1,889,000 $1,686,700 $1,247,200 $940,900 SPECIAL PROJECT FUND -PUBLIC ARTS PROGRAM Family Recreation and Fitness Center 0 0 67,590 0 0 TOTALS $0 $0 $67,590 $0 $0 CI-28 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #3 Capital Improvement Element Existing Table SD-CIP, School District of Palm Beach County Capital Improvement Schedule SD #3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #4 Capital Improvement Element Updated Table SD-CIP, School District of Palm Beach County Capital Improvement Schedule SD #4 1 TABLE SD-CIP -SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE 2 TABLE SD-CIP -SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE 3 TABLE SD-CIP -SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE 4 TABLE SD-CIP -SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE 5 TABLE SD-CIP -SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE 6 TABLE SD-CIP -SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #5 Capital Improvement Element Table RW-CIP Existing Reclaimed Water Capital Improvement Schedule SD #5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #6 Capital Improvement Element Table RW-CIP Updated Reclaimed Water Capital Improvement Schedule SD #6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #7 Capital Improvement Element Existing General Fund Revenue and Expenditure 5-Year Forecast Table SD #7 CI -12 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #8 Capital Improvement Element Updated General Fund Revenue and Expenditure 5-Year Forecast Table SD #8 GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FIVE YEAR FORECAST BUDGET ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVENUES (1) (2) FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 AD VALOREM TAXES 52,078,456 46,416,548 46,371,008 47,660,539 47,816,052 AD VALOREM TAXES -DELINQUENT 164,544 260,000 266,500 273,163 279,992 SALES AND USE TAXES 1,300,000 1,357,420 1,391,356 1,426,139 1,461,793 FRANCHISE TAXES 5,290,900 5,298,020 5,430,471 5,566,232 5,705,388 UTILITY TAXES 5,007,960 5,109,000 5,236,725 5,367,643 5,501,834 OTHER TAXES 3,980,000 3,980,000 4,079,500 4,181,488 4,286,025 LICENSES/PERMITS 3,836,310 3,376,300 3,460,708 3,547,225 3,635,906 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 6,120,058 5,962,570 6,111,634 6,264,425 6,421,036 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 8,720,747 9,189,430 9,419,166 9,654,645 9,896,011 FINES & FORFEITURES 649,400 885,500 907,638 930,328 953,587 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 15,500 15,500 15,000 20,000 20,000 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS 3,418,350 3,659,890 3,751,387 3,845,172 3,941,301 RECOVERY OF ADMINSTRATIVE COSTS 2,313,000 2,613,970 2,679,319 2,746,302 2,814,960 MISCELLANEOUS 2,852,630 2,930,580 3,003,845 3,078,941 3,155,914 SUB-TOTAL 95,747,855 91,054,728 92,124,255 94,562,243 95,889,797 PRIOR YEAR SURPLUS 621,210 73,411 125,000 -164,339 PRIOR YEAR ENCUMBRANCES 308,862 ----TOTAL REVENUES 96,677,927 91,128,139 92,249,255 94,562,243 96,054,136 EXPENDITURES (3) GENERAL GOVERNMENT 7,147,949 6,669,036 6,735,727 6,870,441 7,007,850 POLICE DEPARTMENT 27,578,082 25,730,351 25,987,654 26,507,407 27,037,555 FIRE DEPARTMENT 23,015,065 21,473,056 21,687,786 22,121,542 22,563,973 PLANNING AND ZONING 1,183,830 1,104,513 1,115,559 1,137,870 1,160,627 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT 2,902,350 2,707,893 2,734,971 2,789,671 2,845,464 ENGINEERING 675,144 629,909 636,208 648,933 661,911 ENV SVC/PUBLIC WORKS 3,954,474 3,689,524 3,726,419 3,800,948 3,876,967 PARKS & RECREATION 12,411,253 11,579,699 11,695,496 12,179,406 12,922,994 TRANSFERS 9,703,093 9,052,986 9,143,516 9,326,386 9,512,914 GRANTS & MISC. EXPENSE 1,854,857 1,730,582 1,747,887 1,782,845 1,818,502 DEBT SERVICE -G.O. 3,576,620 3,576,540 3,573,840 3,569,827 2,168,937 DEBT SERVICE -UTIL TAX 1,205,620 1,252,500 1,246,500 1,245,700 1,294,900 DEBT SERVICE -NON AD VALOREM REV 1,364,450 1,596,200 1,604,750 1,605,663 1,572,542 DEBT SERVICE -LEASE 82,300 185,350 185,350 189,057 189,000 D. S. -NON AD VALOREM PROPOSED (4) -150,000 425,000 695,000 1,420,000 CONTINGENCY 22,840 2,591 91,548 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 96,677,927 91,128,139 92,249,255 94,562,243 96,054,136 TOTAL INCREASE OVER THE PRIOR YEAR -6% 1% 3% 2% ASSESSED VALUE -1000'S 7,010,118 6,271,870 5,644,683 5,729,353 5,843,940 OPERATING MILLAGE -CURR 7.1900 7.1900 7.9809 8.1006 8.2221 DEBT MILLAGE -CURRENT 0.5316 0.6003 0.6665 0.6559 0.3907 DEBT MILLAGE -PROPOSED -----ESTIMATED TOTAL MILLAGE 7.7216 7.7903 8.6474 8.7565 8.6128 AD VALOREM TAXES 52,078,456 46,416,548 46,371,008 47,660,539 47,816,052 Assumptions: (1) Ad Valorem Revenues: a.) Assessed Valuations: FY10 and FY11 were provided by Palm Beach County. FY12, FY13 and FY14 assumed increases/decreases of (-10%), (1.5%) and (2%), respectively. b.) Millage economic growth factors for FY11 through FY 14 are as follows: FY11 (0%), FY12 (11%), FY13 (1.5%) and FY14 (1.5%). (2) Non Ad Valorem Revenues: FY10 and FY11 reflects current projections. FY12 through FY13 assumes a 2.5% increase; FY 14 assumes a 3.5% increase. (3) Operating and Non Operating Expenses excluding debt: FY 10 reflects current projections. FY 11 through FY 14 assumes increases/decreases as follows: FY11 (-6.7%), FY12 (1%), FY13 (2%) and FY14 (2%). FY 13 and FY14 in the Parks & Recreation Budget includes $250,000 and $500,000 respectively, to incorporate the staffing of the Family Community Center. (4) Proposed Non Ad Valorem Debt Service is based on three borrowings: 1.) a principal amount of $7,050,000, a 20 year term, an interest rate of 4% issued in FY12 for the construction of a Family Recreation and Fitness Center ($6,000,000) and the Veteran's Park Project ($1,050,000) and 2.) a principal amount if $6,050,000, a 10 year term, and an interest rate of 4% for the purchase of a Motorolla Radio System ($6,000,000) and finance software ($500,000) and 3.) a principal amount of $640,000, a 5 year term, an interest rate of 5% issued in FY13 for the purchase of VMware Servers. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #9 Capital Improvement Element Existing Pledgeable Revenue Matrix Table SD #9 CI -13 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #10 Capital Improvement Element Updated Pledgeable Revenue Matrix Table SD #10 LOCAL LICENSES WATER 1/2 CENT GUARANTEED UTILITIES FRANCHISE OPTION AND FINES AND AND SALES TAX ENTITLEMENT (1) TAX (2) TAX (3) GAS TAX PERMITS (5) FORFEITURES (5) TOTAL SEWER FYE 2009 REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR 3 ,972,093 362,476 8 ,958,175 5,096,039 1,308,213 3,852,538 575,848 24,125,382 1 5,109,152 DEBT SERVICE AND COVERAGE REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR 3 ,177,674 362,476 7 ,166,540 3,774,844 872,142 2,568,359 383,899 18,305,933 1 2,590,960 DEBT SERVICE (4) --REVENUE DEBT CAPACITY 3 8,500,000 4,000,000 8 7,000,000 45,500,000 8,200,000 31,000,000 4,500,000 218,700,000 1 43,000,000 OUTSTANDING DEBT UTILITIES TAX 4 9,943,195 49,943,195 REVENUE BONDS 4 ,939,565 450,763 -6,337,267 1,626,851 4,790,890 716,106 18,861,441 WATER AND SEWER SERIES 5 0,146,953 UNUSED REVENUE DEBT CAPACITY 3 3,560,435 3,549,237 3 7,056,805 39,162,733 6,573,149 26,209,110 3,783,894 149,895,364 9 2,853,047 FOOTNOTES: (1) This represents the guaranteed entitlement portion of the State Revenue Sharing. (2) Consists of Utilities Taxes on the following utilities: electric, metered and bottled gas and the CST. (3) Consists of Franchise taxes on the following utilities: electric, and gas. (4) The Revenue Debt Capacity amounts are calculated assuming the following coverage factors, maturity amounts and average coupons based on current market conditions. (5) Typically used as backup pledges. Revenue Coverage Factor Maturity Average Coupon W/S 1 .10 25 years 5 .00 1/2 Cent Sales Tax 1 .25 25 years 5 .00 Guaranteed Entitlement 1 .00 25 years 5 .00 Utilities Service Tax 1 .25 25 years 5 .00 Franchise Tax 1 .35 25 years 5 .00 Local Option Gas Tax 1 .50 15 years 5 .00 Water and Sewer System 1 .20 25 years 5 .00 Licenses and Permits 1 .50 25 years 5 .00 Cigarette Tax 1 .75 15 years 5 .00 Fines & Forfeitures 1 .50 25 years 5 .00 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH PLEDGEABLE REVENUE MATRIX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #11 Capital Improvement Element Existing Debt Summary Table SD #11 CI -14 CI -15 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #12 Capital Improvement Element Updated Debt Summary Table SD #12 THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DEBT SUMMARY Principal as FYE 2007 Maximum Annual of 9/30/09 Security Revenues (1)(2) Debt Service (2) Coverage (2) GENERAL FUND: $15,020,000 Utilities Tax Bonds, Series 2002 3,235,000 Utilities Tax (3) 8,958,175 2,592,250 3.46 $24,635,000 Utilities Tax Bonds, Series 2007 24,635,000 Utilities Tax (3) Sub-total: 27,870,000 $10,000,000 Revenue Bonds, Series 2000 5,260,000 Non Ad valorem Tax Revenues (4) 43,492,843 1,955,663 22.24 $9,685,000 Revenue Bonds, Series 2003 7,320,000 Non Ad valorem Tax Revenues (4) $3,000,000 Revenue Bonds, Series 2008 (LOC) 3,000,000 Non Ad valorem Tax Revenues (4) 15,580,000 ENTERPRISE FUNDS: $28,104,475 Water and Sewer 5,974,475 Net Revenues of the Combined 15,894,186 5,925,898 2.68 Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A and 1993B Facility (5) $15,030,000 Water/Sewer Rev Bonds, 7,695,000 Net Revenues of the Combined Series 1997 Facility (5) $7,000,000 Water and Sewer 6,770,000 Net Revenues of the Combined Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A Facility (5) $2,350,000 Water and Sewer 2,105,000 Net Revenues of the Combined Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006B Facility (5) $9,000,000 Water and Sewer 8,810,000 Net Revenues of the Combined Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2007 Facility (5) Sub-total: 31,354,475 Total Revenue Bond Debt: 74,804,475 Principal as Maximum Annual of 9/30/09 Security Revenues (1)(2) Debt Service (2) Coverage (2) GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT (6): $15,685,000 G.O. Series 2002 7,655,000 Full faith and credit of the City (6) n/a n/a n/a Matures 2013 $14,000,000 G.O. Series 2004 11,810,000 Full faith and credit of the City (6) n/a n/a n/a Matures 2024 $10,000,000 G.O. Series 2005 10,000,000 Full faith and credit of the City (6) n/a n/a n/a Matures 2024 Total General Obligation Debt: 29,465,000 Footnotes: (1) Audited amounts. (2) All Bonds are on a parity therefore, the coverage calculations are based on the respective combine maximum annual debt service. (3) The Utilities Tax is imposed on each and every purchase in the City of electricity, metered and bottled gas and telecommunications services. (4) Non Ad valorem revenues are based on the Gross General Fund Revenue less: Ad Valorem tax Revenue collected, 6.7% of the Unreserved Balance, as well as the highest year of Utility Tax debt service. An amount of $350,000 was estimated for the 2008 Line of Credit. (5) The Net Revenues of the Combined Public Utility include the revenues derived from the operation of the City's Water System, exludes connection fees, interest expense, depreciation and amortization expense. Special assessments and impact charges are not pledged for payment of Debt Service on the Bonds, however, the City may, by subsequent proceedings of the City Commission elect to pledge special assessments and impact charges for the payment of Debt Service. The Combined Public Utility Revenues exclude connection fees totalling $235,998. (6) The General Obligation Bonds are obligations of the City for which its full faith, credit, and taxing power are irrevocably pledged and and debt service is paid from ad valorem taxes levied on all taxable property located in the City (excluding homestead exemptions). Revenues available to pay debt service on General Obligation Bonds are based on the millage rate as approved by referendum and are equal to the annual debt service requirement of the bonds. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #13 Lintco Development Existing and Proposed Colored Future Land Use Maps and Lintco Development Overlay District SD #13 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #14 Traffic Impact Analysis for Lintco Development Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. June 2010 SD #14 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DELRAY BEACH, FL Prepared for: Lintco, Inc. Delray Beach, Florida Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. West Palm Beach, Florida 144491000 June 2010 Revised June 2010 CA 00000696 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 561/845-0665 TEL 561/882-0199 FAX Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc Page | i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................... .......................................... 1 PROJECT TRAFFIC ................................................................................................ 4 Trip Generation ....................... ............................................................................. 4 Traffic Distribution ................................................................................................ 6 Traffic Assignment............................................................................................... 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ....................................................... ....................... 8 Existing (2009) Conditions ................................................................................... 8 Short-term (2015) Horizon .................................. ................................................. 8 Long-term (2035) Horizon ................................................................................... 8 EXISTING (2009) CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 9 SHORT-TERM (2015) HORIZON ........................................................................... 11 LONG-TERM (2035) HORIZON ............................................................................. 14 CONCLUSION ............................................................................... ....................... 17 APPENDIX A: PROJECT SITE INFORMATION APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC COUNT DATA APPENDIX C: COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT DATA APPENDIX D: 2035 MODEL VOLUMEs Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc Page | ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Maximum Development Intensities .................................. .................... 2 Table 2 Trip Generation – Maximum Intensity ................................................... 5 Table 3 Existing (2009) Daily Traffic Link Analysis .......................... ................. 10 Table 4 Short Term (2015) Significance Analysis ............................................ 12 Table 5 Short Term (2015) Link Analysis .......................................... .............. 13 Table 6 Long Term (2035) Daily Traffic Significance Analysis ......................... 15 Table 7 Long Term (2035) Daily Traffic Link Analysis ...................................... 16 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location ........................................................................................ 3 Figure 2 Project Trip Distribution ............................... ......................................... 7 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 1 INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has been retained to prepare a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment traffic analysis for the proposed Lintco Commercial development. The project site is located on the northwest corner of Linton Boulevard & SW 4th Avenue in the City of Delray Beach. A recent survey of the project site is provided in Appendix A. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the project site. The parcel control numbers (PCN) for the subject parcels were obtained from the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser’s Office and are listed below: ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0010 ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0040 ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0050 ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0060 ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0090 ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0110 ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0120 ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0140 ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0150 ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0160 ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0170 ̇ 12-43-46-20-01-008-0180 The +/-7.08-acre project site is currently vacant and its future land use is Medium Density Residential which allows for 5-12 dwelling units per acre, or a maximum of 85 dwelling units on this site. It is proposed to amend the existing future land use designation to General Commercial with a maximum development intensity of 111,026 square feet (FAR = 0.36) plus 85 dwelling units (12 dwelling units per acre). Table 1 summarizes the existing and proposed future land use intensities for the existing and proposed future land use designations. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 2 This analysis was conducted following general existing, short term and long term analysis procedures used to evaluate comprehensive plan amendments. This report summarizes the findings of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment traffic analysis. TABLE 1 MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITIES LINTCO COMMERCIAL Existing Future Land Use Medium Density Residential Proposed Future Land Use 12 DU/Acre 7.08 85 DU © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. K:\WPB_TPTO\1444\144491000 Lintco Site\Excel\[MASTER-Lintco_CPA_Revised.xls]T1-Dev Scenario Maximum Acreage Intensity Maximum Development General Commercial 0.36 FAR 7.08 111,026 SF 12 DU/Acre 7.08 85 DU Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 4 PROJECT TRAFFIC Project traffic used in this analysis is defined as the vehicle trips expected to be generated by the project, and the distribution and assignment of that traffic over the study roadway network. Trip Generation The trip generation calculations are based on the trip generation rates published by Palm Beach County and the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation, 8th Edition. Table 2 summarizes the trip generation potential for the maximum development intensities for both the existing future land use (FLU) and proposed FLU. As indicated in Table 2, the existing FLU has the potential to generate 595 daily trips, 45 AM peak-hour trips, and 53 PM peak-hour trips. The proposed FLU has the potential to generate 4,843 new external daily trips, 104 new external AM peakhour trips, and 499 new external PM peak-hour trips. The net increase in the trip generation potential is 4,248 daily trips, 59 AM peak-hour trips, and 446 PM peakhour trips. Because the proposed amendment for the subject site results in a net increase in the trip generation potential of the site, roadway link analyses were conducted for the existing (2009), short-term (2015), and long-term (2035) planning horizons. Based on the trip generation potential, the radius of development influence was determined to be two miles for each analysis scenario. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 5 TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION -MAXIMUM INTENSITY LINTCO COMMERCIAL DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT Existing Future Land Use Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre) 85 DU 595 45 9 36 53 34 19 Existing FLU External Trips 595 45 9 36 53 34 19 Proposed Future Land Use 111,026 SF 7,217 111 68 43 754 362 392 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre) 85 DU 595 45 9 36 53 34 19 Subtotal 7,812 156 77 79 807 396 411 Internal Capture General Commercial (0.36 FAR) 0.83% 60 5 4 1 5 2 3 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre) 10% 60 5 1 4 5 3 2 Subtotal 120 10 5 5 10 5 5 Proposed FLU Driveway Trips 7,692 146 72 74 797 391 406 Pass-By Traffic General Commercial (0.36 FAR) 39.81% 2,849 42 25 17 298 143 155 Proposed FLU New External Trips 4,843 104 47 57 499 248 251 4,248 59 38 21 446 214 232 Note: Trip generation was calculated using the following data: Daily Traffic Generation Apartments [PBC] = T = 7(X) General Commercial [PBC] = Ln(T) = 0.94*Ln(X) + 5.87 AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Apartments [PBC] = T = 0.49(X) + 3.73; (20% in, 80% out) General Commercial [PBC] = T = 1.00 (X); (61% in, 39% out) PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Apartments [PBC] = T = 0.62(X); (65% in, 35% out) General Commercial [PBC] = Ln(T) = 0.67*Ln(X) + 3.47; (48% in, 53% out) Pass-by General Commercial [PBC] = % = 94.49 -11.61*Ln(X)© 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\excel\[master-lintco_cpa_revised.xls]t2-tripgen LAND USE INTENSITY 6/25/2010 Net New External Trips (Proposed-Existing) General Commercial (0.36 FAR) Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 6 Traffic Distribution Traffic distribution is the pairing of trip ends from the subject site with other land uses in the area. These trips were assigned to the surrounding roadways based upon a review of the roadway network proposed to be in place at the time of buildout and its travel time characteristics. The distribution according to cardinal directions is: NORTH -35 percent SOUTH -25 percent EAST -30 percent WEST -10 percent Traffic Assignment The daily and peak-hour trips for the project were assigned to the surrounding roadway network proposed to be in place for each respective analysis year. Figure 2 illustrates the project traffic assignment to the surrounding roadway network. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 8 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Consistent with comprehensive plan amendment evaluation requirements, roadway segment analyses were conducted to address the traffic conditions for the existing, short-term, and long-term planning horizons. Existing (2009) Conditions This analysis is conducted using the peak season daily volumes published by Palm Beach County and FDOT (see Appendix B). Because the project site is currently vacant, it utilizes the daily trip generation potential of the maximum development potential of the proposed FLU designation. Short-term (2015) Horizon This analysis is based on the Test 2 standards of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance (TPSO) and was conducted using the peakseason peak-hour traffic volumes published by Palm Beach County. Again, because the project site is currently vacant, this analysis utilizes the peak-hour trip generation potential of the maximum development potential of the proposed FLU designation. Long-term (2035) Horizon This analysis was conducted using the 2035 model volumes and the net increase in the daily trip generation potential between the existing and proposed FLU designations. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 9 EXISTING (2009) CONDITIONS As previously discussed, the site is currently vacant. Therefore, the net-increase in daily trip generation potential is 4,843 net new external daily trips. The radius of development influence and the significantly impacted roadway links were determined based on Policy 3.5-d of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. For this analysis scenario, the radius of development influence for the existing analysis is two miles because the increase in trips is between 4,001 and 8,000 net daily trips. The daily project trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius. The existing traffic volumes plus the project trips of the proposed future land use were compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Table 3, Linton Boulevard from SW 10th Avenue to Federal Highway is significantly impacted by the proposed FLU amendment. Therefore, a level of service (LOS) analysis was performed to evaluate the operating conditions of the significantly impacted roadways. As indicated in Table 3, all significantly impacted roadways operate acceptably at LOS D or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 10 TABLE 3 EXISTING (2009) DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS LINTCO COMMERCIAL EXIST LOS D 2009 PEAK PROJECT TRIPS TOTAL PROJECT IMPACT MEETS # OF GEN. SVC. SEASON DAILY DAILY v/c % SIGNIF. LOS D LANES VOLUME VOLUME1 TRIPS2 TRAFFIC THRSHLD. STANDARD? Linton Boulevard S. Mi litary Trai l to Homewood Boulevard 6LD 49,200 40,704 8% 387 41,091 0.84 0.79% 3.00% no -Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,200 37,511 13% 630 38,141 0.78 1.28% 3.00% no -Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,200 37,905 30% 1,453 39,358 0.80 2.95% 3.00% no -I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 49,200 44,840 34% 1,647 46,487 0.94 3.35% 3.00% yes yes 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 49,200 38,191 42% 2,034 40,225 0.82 4.13% 3.00% yes yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 49,200 38,191 53% 2,567 40,758 0.83 5.22% 3.00% yes yes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 4LD 32,700 15,583 34% 1,647 17,230 0.53 5.04% 3.00% yes yes Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,700 15,583 9% 436 16,019 0.49 1.33% 3.00% no -SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L 24,500 15,972 1% 48 16,020 0.65 0.20% 3.00% no -SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 2L 12,300 15,972 2% 97 16,069 1.31 0.79% 2.00% no -SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 2L 12,300 15,972 2% 97 16,069 1.31 0.79% 2.00% no -S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 12,300 15,972 2% 97 16,069 1.31 0.79% 2.00% no -S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 2L 12,300 15,972 2% 97 16,069 1.31 0.79% 2.00% no -SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 2L 12,300 15,972 0% 0 15,972 1.30 0.00% 2.00% no -Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 12,300 11,200 3% 145 11,345 0.92 1.18% 3.00% no -Congress Avenue NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 49,200 17,860 8% 387 18,247 0.37 0.79% 3.00% no -Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 49,200 23,615 9% 436 24,051 0.49 0.89% 3.00% no -I-95 Yamato Road to NW 82nd Street 8LX 144,300 206,383 0% 0 206,383 1.43 0.00% 1.00% no -NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX 182,600 207,447 2% 97 207,544 1.14 0.05% 3.00% no -Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX 182,600 207,447 2% 97 207,544 1.14 0.05% 3.00% no -Atlantic Avenue to Woolbright Road 10LX 182,600 177,723 0% 0 177,723 0.97 0.00% 3.00% no -SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 12,300 11,200 5% 242 11,442 0.93 1.97% 3.00% no -Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 15,400 11,930 8% 387 12,317 0.80 2.51% 3.00% no -Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L 15,400 11,930 8% 387 12,317 0.80 2.51% 3.00% no -Federal Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 32,700 28,892 13% 630 29,522 0.90 1.93% 3.00% no -Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 32,700 29,539 15% 726 30,265 0.93 2.22% 3.00% no -SE 5th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,500 11,938 12% 581 12,519 0.42 1.97% 3.00% no -SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,500 11,938 10% 484 12,422 0.42 1.64% 3.00% no -Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,500 12,130 3% 145 12,275 0.42 0.49% 3.00% no -SE 6th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,500 13,287 12% 581 13,868 0.47 1.97% 3.00% no -SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,500 13,287 10% 484 13,771 0.47 1.64% 3.00% no -Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,500 13,018 3% 145 13,163 0.45 0.49% 3.00% no -Ocean Boulevard South of Linton Boulevard 2L 12,300 13,227 5% 242 13,469 1.10 1.97% 3.00% no -North of Linton Boulevard 2L 12,300 9,475 2% 97 9,572 0.78 0.79% 3.00% no -Swinton Avenue SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue 2L 12,300 9,560 6% 291 9,851 0.80 2.37% 3.00% no -Atlantic Avenue to Lake Ida Road 2L 12,300 10,874 2% 97 10,971 0.89 0.79% 3.00% no -Lowson Boulevard S. Mi litary Trai l to Homewood Boulevard 2L 12,300 15,972 0% 0 15,972 1.30 0.00% 2.00% no -Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 2L 12,300 15,972 1% 48 16,020 1.30 0.39% 2.00% no -Atlantic Avenue Barwick Road to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,200 38,140 1% 48 38,188 0.78 0.10% 3.00% no -Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,200 43,881 1% 48 43,929 0.89 0.10% 3.00% no -I-95 to SW 8th Avenue 4LD 32,700 37,389 1% 48 37,437 1.14 0.15% 3.00% no -SW 8th Avenue to Swinton Avenue 4LD 32,700 22,814 1% 48 22,862 0.70 0.15% 3.00% no -Swinton Avenue to U.S. 1 2L 12,300 13,072 0% 0 13,072 1.06 0.00% 3.00% no -U.S. 1 to Ocean Boulevard 4L 24,500 14,943 0% 0 14,943 0.61 0.00% 3.00% no -Boca Raton Boulevard NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L 12,300 11,200 1% 48 11,248 0.91 0.39% 3.00% no -Note: 12009 I-95 AADT obtained from the FDOT Florida Traffic Onl ine webs i te. 2Dai ly project trips based on maximum trip generation potential of proposed future land use. K:\WPB_TPTO\1444\144491000 Lintco Site\Excel\[MASTER-Lintco_CPA_Revised.xls]T3-Exist © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. % ASSIGNMENT ROADWAY SEGMENT SIGNIFICANT? Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 11 SHORT-TERM (2015) HORIZON As previously noted, the site is currently vacant. Therefore, the net-increase in daily trip generation potential is 104 net new external AM peak-hour trips and 499 net new external PM peak-hour trips. For the purposes of this analysis, the same radius of development influence and significance thresholds from the existing (2009) analysis was utilized. Significance was determined in accordance with the Test 2 LOS E service volumes indicated in the Palm Beach County TPSO. As indicated in Table 4, Linton Boulevard from Congress Avenue to Federal Highway is projected to be significantly impacted by the proposed development. The AM and PM peak-hour project trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius. Background traffic was projected for all significantly impacted roadways by applying a one-percent annual growth rate plus committed development trips as indicated by the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) database. Future total volumes were then compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Table 5, all significantly impacted roadways operate acceptably at LOS E or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 12 TABLE 4 SHORT TERM (2015) SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS LINTCO COMMERCIAL COMMITED LOS E PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IMPACT # OF GEN. SVC. % LANES VOLUME Linton Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 6LD 4,920 8% 9 40 0.81% no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 4,920 13% 13 65 1.32% no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 4,920 30% 31 149 3.03% yes I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 4,920 34% 35 169 3.43% yes 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 4,920 42% 44 209 4.25% yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 4,920 53% 55 264 5.37% yes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 4LD 3,270 34% 35 169 5.17% yes Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 3,270 9% 9 45 1.38% no SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L 2,450 1% 1 5 0.20% no SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 2L 1,240 2% 2 10 0.81% no SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 2L 1,240 2% 2 10 0.81% no S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 1,240 2% 2 10 0.81% no S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 2L 1,240 2% 2 10 0.81% no SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 2L 1,240 0% 0 0 0.00% no Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 1,240 3% 3 15 1.21% no Congress Avenue NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 4,920 8% 9 40 0.81% no Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 4,920 9% 9 45 0.91% no I-95 Yamato Road to NW 82nd Street 8LX 13,420 0% 0 0 0.00% no NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX 16,980 2% 2 10 0.06% no Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX 16,980 2% 2 10 0.06% no Atlantic Avenue to Woolbright Road 10LX 16,980 0% 0 0 0.00% no SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 1,240 5% 5 25 2.02% no Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 1,550 8% 9 40 2.58% no Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L 1,550 8% 9 40 2.58% no Federal Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 3,270 13% 13 65 1.99% no Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 3,270 15% 16 75 2.29% no SE 5th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 2,950 12% 13 60 2.03% no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 2,950 10% 11 50 1.69% no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 2,950 3% 3 15 0.51% no SE 6th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 2,950 12% 13 60 2.03% no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 2,950 10% 11 50 1.69% no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 2,950 3% 3 15 0.51% no Ocean Boulevard South of Linton Boulevard 2L 1,240 5% 5 25 2.02% no North of Linton Boulevard 2L 1,240 2% 2 10 0.81% no Swinton Avenue SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue 2L 1,240 6% 6 30 2.42% no Atlantic Avenue to Lake Ida Road 2L 1,240 2% 2 10 0.81% no Lowson Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 2L 1,240 0% 0 0 0.00% no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 2L 1,240 1% 1 5 0.40% no Atlantic Avenue Barwick Road to Congress Avenue 6LD 4,920 1% 1 5 0.10% no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 4,920 1% 1 5 0.10% no I-95 to SW 8th Avenue 4LD 3,270 1% 1 5 0.15% no SW 8th Avenue to Swinton Avenue 4LD 3,270 1% 1 5 0.15% no Swinton Avenue to U.S. 1 2L 1,240 0% 0 0 0.00% no U.S. 1 to Ocean Boulevard 4L 2,450 0% 0 0 0.00% no Boca Raton Boulevard NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L 1,240 1% 1 5 0.40% no K:\WPB_TPTO\1444\144491000 Lintco Site\Excel\[MASTER-Lintco_CPA_Revised.xls]T4-Short © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGNMENT SIGNIFICANT? 6/25/2010 AM PM Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 13 TABLE 5 SHORT TERM (2015) LINK ANALYSIS LINTCO COMMERCIAL COMMITED LOS E PROJ TRIPS 2009 Prevailing Applied Historic Committed 2015 Bckgrnd 2015 Total 2015 Meets # OF GEN. SVC. Traffic Growth Growth Vol. Growth Volumes Volume Volume v/c Test 2 LANES VOLUME AM PM Rate Rate AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM Standard? Linton Boulevard Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 4,920 31 149 2,426 2,786 -7.95% 1.00% 146 167 117 217 2689 3170 2720 3319 0.67 yes I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 4,920 35 169 2,590 3,526 -4.93% 1.00% 155 212 248 378 2,993 4,116 3,028 4,285 0.87 yes 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 4,920 44 209 2,119 2,995 -1.60% 1.00% 127 180 202 308 2,448 3,483 2,492 3,692 0.75 yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 4,920 55 264 2,119 2,995 -1.60% 1.00% 127 180 189 259 2,435 3,434 2,490 3,698 0.75 yes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 4LD 3,270 35 169 1,002 1,247 -6.49% 1.00% 60 75 131 187 1,193 1,509 1,228 1,678 0.51 yes K:\WPB_TPTO\1444\144491000 Lintco Site\Excel\[MASTER-Lintco_CPA_Revised.xls]T5-Test 2 © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT AM PM Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 14 LONG-TERM (2035) HORIZON The net-increase in daily trip generation potential between the existing and proposed FLU designations is 4,248 net new external daily trips. The radius of development influence and the significantly impacted roadway links were determined based on Policy 3.5-d of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. For this analysis scenario, the radius of development influence for the existing analysis is two miles because the increase in trips is between 4,001 and 8,000 daily trips. Year 2035 model volumes (see Appendix C) were obtained from the Palm Beach County MPO for each of the study roadways within the two-mile radius. Then, the model volumes were adjusted to AADT by applying the model output conversion factor (MOCF). The daily project trips were then assigned to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius. The future total volumes associated with proposed future land use were then compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Table 6, Linton Boulevard from SW 10th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway is significantly impacted by the proposed FLU amendment. Therefore, a level of service (LOS) analysis was performed to evaluate the operating conditions of the significantly impacted roadways. As indicated in Table 7, all significantly impacted roadways are projected to operate acceptably at LOS D or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 15 TABLE 6 LONG TERM (2035) DAILY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS LINTCO COMMERCIAL ADOPTED LOS D PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IMPACT # OF GEN. SVC. DAILY % SIGNIF. LANES VOLUME TRIPS1 THRSHLD. Linton Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 6LD 49,200 8% 340 0.69% 3.00% no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,200 13% 552 1.12% 3.00% no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,200 30% 1274 2.59% 3.00% no I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 49,200 34% 1444 2.93% 3.00% no 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 49,200 42% 1784 3.63% 3.00% yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 49,200 53% 2251 4.58% 3.00% yes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 6LD 49,200 34% 1444 2.93% 3.00% no Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,700 9% 382 1.17% 3.00% no SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L 24,500 1% 42 0.17% 3.00% no SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 2L 12,300 2% 85 0.69% 3.00% no SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 2L 12,300 2% 85 0.69% 3.00% no S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 12,300 2% 85 0.69% 1.00% no S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 2L 12,300 2% 85 0.69% 3.00% no SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 2L 12,300 0% 0 0.00% 3.00% no Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 12,300 3% 127 1.03% 3.00% no Congress Avenue NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 49,200 8% 340 0.69% 3.00% no Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 49,200 9% 382 0.78% 3.00% no I-95 Yamato Road to NW 82nd Street 10LX 182,600 0% 0 0.00% 3.00% no NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX 182,600 2% 85 0.05% 2.00% no Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX 182,600 2% 85 0.05% 2.00% no Atlantic Avenue to Woolbright Road 10LX 182,600 0% 0 0.00% 2.00% no SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 12,300 5% 212 1.72% 3.00% no Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 15,400 8% 340 2.21% 3.00% no Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L 15,400 8% 340 2.21% 3.00% no Federal Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 32,700 13% 552 1.69% 2.00% no Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 32,700 15% 637 1.95% 3.00% no SE 5th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,500 12% 510 1.73% 3.00% no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,500 10% 425 1.44% 3.00% no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,500 3% 127 0.43% 3.00% no SE 6th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,500 12% 510 1.73% 3.00% no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,500 10% 425 1.44% 3.00% no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,500 3% 127 0.43% 3.00% no Ocean Boulevard South of Linton Boulevard 2L 12,300 5% 212 1.72% 3.00% no North of Linton Boulevard 2L 12,300 2% 85 0.69% 3.00% no Swinton Avenue SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue 2L 12,300 6% 255 2.07% 3.00% no Atlantic Avenue to Lake Ida Road 2L 12,300 2% 85 0.69% 2.00% no Lowson Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 2L 12,300 0% 0 0.00% 3.00% no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 2L 12,300 1% 42 0.34% 3.00% no Atlantic Avenue Barwick Road to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,200 1% 42 0.09% 3.00% no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,200 1% 42 0.09% 3.00% no I-95 to SW 8th Avenue 4LD 32,700 1% 42 0.13% 2.00% no SW 8th Avenue to Swinton Avenue 4LD 32,700 1% 42 0.13% 3.00% no Swinton Avenue to U.S. 1 2L 12,300 0% 0 0.00% 1.00% no U.S. 1 to Ocean Boulevard 4L 24,500 0% 0 0.00% 3.00% no Boca Raton Boulevard NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L 12,300 1% 42 0.34% 3.00% no Note: 1Dai ly project trips based on di fference between maximum trip generation potential of exi sting and proposed future land uses. K:\WPB_TPTO\1444\144491000 Lintco Site\Excel\[MASTER-Lintco_CPA_Revised.xls]T6-2035 © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGNMENT SIGNIFICANT? Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 16 TABLE 7 LONG TERM (2035) DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS LINTCO COMMERCIAL ADOPTED LOS D PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IMPACT 2035 2035 TOTAL MEETS # OF GEN. SVC. DAILY % SIGNIF. MODEL MOCF BACKGROUND DAILY v/c LOS D LANES VOLUME TRIPS1 THRSHLD. VOLUME AADT TRAFFIC STANDARD? Linton Boulevard 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 49,200 42% 1784 3.63% 3.00% yes 50,000 0.95 47,500 42,539 0.865 yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 49,200 53% 2251 4.58% 3.00% yes 45,100 0.95 42,845 43,006 0.874 yes Note: 1Da ily project trips based on di fference between maximum trip generation potential of exis ting and proposed future land uses . K:\WPB_TPTO\1444\144491000 Lintco Site\Excel\[MASTER-Lintco_CPA_Revised.xls]T7-2035 © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGNMENT SIGNIFICANT? Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 17 CONCLUSION The foregoing comprehensive plan traffic analysis has been conducted to evaluate the proposed future land use designation change from the existing medium density residential use to the proposed general commercial use on the site located on the northwest corner of Linton Boulevard and SW 4th Avenue in the City of Delray Beach, Florida. Based on the analyses conducted for each of the three planning horizons required for comprehensive plan amendment analyses (existing, shortterm, and long-term), each significantly impacted roadway is projected to operate acceptably. Therefore, based on the analyses within this study, the future land use amendment is expected to continue to allow the significantly impacted roadways to operate acceptably upon buildout of the proposed development site. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #15 Waterford Existing and Proposed Colored Future Land Use Maps and Waterford Development Overlay District SD #15 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #16 Traffic Impact Analysis for Waterford Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. July 2010 SD #16 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DELRAY BEACH, FL Prepared for: Delint, Inc. Delray Beach, Florida Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. West Palm Beach, Florida July 2010 CA 00000696 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 561/845-0665 TEL 561/882-0199 FAX Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc Page | i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................ ..................................... 1 PROJECT TRAFFIC ................................................................................................ 3 PROJECT TRAFFIC ............................ .................................................................... 4 Trip Generation .................................................................................................... 4 Traffic Assignment............................................................................................... 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ....................................................... ....................... 8 Existing (2010) Conditions ................................................................................... 8 Short-term (2015) Horizon .................................. ................................................. 8 Long-term (2035) Horizon ................................................................................... 8 EXISTING (2010) CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 9 SHORT-TERM (2015) HORIZON ........................................................................... 12 LONG-TERM (2035) HORIZON ............................................................................. 16 CONCLUSION ............................................................................... ....................... 19 APPENDIX A: PROJECT SITE INFORMATION APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC COUNT DATA APPENDIX C: COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT DATA APPENDIX D: 2035 MODEL VOLUMES Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc Page | ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Maximum Development Intensities ....................................... ............... 3 Table 2 Trip Generation – Maximum Intensity ................................................... 5 Table 3 Existing (2010) Daily Traffic Link Analysis ............................... ............ 10 Table 4 Short Term (2015) Significance Analysis ............................................ 13 Table 5 Short Term (2015) Link Analysis ............................................... ......... 15 Table 6 Long Term (2035) Daily Traffic Significance Analysis ......................... 17 Table 7 Long Term (2035) Daily Traffic Link Analysis ...................................... 18 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location ........................................................................................ 2 Figure 2 Traffic Distribution .................................... ............................................ 7 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 1 INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has been retained to prepare a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment traffic analysis for the proposed Waterford development. The project site is located on Alta Meadows Lane approximately 550 feet south of Lindell Boulevard in the City of Delray Beach. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the project site. The parcel control number (PCN) for the subject parcel, obtained from the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser’s Office, is 12-43-46-29-41-000-0020 (see Appendix A). The +/-4.58-acre project site is currently vacant and its future land use is Transitional (TRN) which allows for 5-12 dwelling units per acre and neighborhood commercial use at an intensity of 1.0 floor-area ratio (FAR); or a maximum of 55 dwelling units and 199,505 square feet of neighborhood commercial use on this site. It is proposed to amend the existing future land use designation to General Commercial (GC) with a maximum development intensity of 236,346 square feet (FAR = 1.32) plus 55 dwelling units (12 dwelling units per acre). Table 1 summarizes the existing and proposed future land use intensities for the existing and proposed future land use designations. This analysis was conducted following general existing, short term and long term analysis procedures used to evaluate comprehensive plan amendments. This report summarizes the findings of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment traffic analysis. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 3 TABLE 1 MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITIES WATERFORD PARK Existing Future Land Use 12 DU/Acre 4.58 55 DU Proposed Future Land Use 12 DU/Acre 4.58 55 DU © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MASTER-Delint_CPA-1.xls]T1-Dev 4.58 199,505 SF Transitional (TRN) General Commercial (GC) 1.32 FAR 4.58 263,346 SF Scenario Maximum Acreage Intensity Maximum Development 1 FAR Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 4 PROJECT TRAFFIC Project traffic used in this analysis is defined as the vehicle trips expected to be generated by the project, and the distribution and assignment of that traffic over the study roadway network. Trip Generation The trip generation calculations are based on the trip generation rates published by Palm Beach County and the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation, 8th Edition. Table 2 summarizes the trip generation potential for the maximum development intensities for both the existing future land use (FLU) and proposed FLU. As indicated in Table 2, the existing FLU has the potential to generate 7,355 daily trips, 160 AM peak-hour trips, and 777 PM peak-hour trips. The proposed FLU has the potential to generate 9,127 new external daily trips, 211 new external AM peak-hour trips, and 973 new external PM peak-hour trips. The net increase in the trip generation potential is 1,772 daily trips, 51 AM peak-hour trips, and 196 PM peak-hour trips. Because the proposed amendment for the subject site results in a net increase in the trip generation potential of the site, roadway link analyses were conducted for the existing (2010), short-term (2015), and long-term (2035) planning horizons. Based on the trip generation potential, the radius of development influence was determined to be three miles for the existing and short-term analysis scenarios, and one mile for the long-term analysis scenario. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 5 TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION -MAXIMUM INTENSITY WATERFORD DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT Existing Future Land Use -Transitional (TRN) 199,505 SF 10,502 200 122 78 1,117 536 581 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre) 55 DU 385 31 6 25 34 22 12 Subtotal 10,887 231 128 103 1,151 558 593 Internal Capture 0.37% 39 3 3 1 3 1 2 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre) 10% 39 3 1 3 3 2 1 Subtotal 78 6 4 4 6 3 3 Existing FLU Driveway Trips 10,809 225 124 99 1,145 555 590 Pass-By Traffic 33.01% 3,454 65 39 25 368 177 191 Existing FLU New External Trips 7,355 160 85 74 777 378 399 Proposed Future Land Use -General Commercial (GC) 263,346 SF 12,544 263 160 103 1,345 646 699 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre) 55 DU 385 31 6 25 34 22 12 Subtotal 12,929 294 166 128 1,379 668 711 Internal Capture Commercial (1.32 FAR) 0.31% 39 3 3 1 3 1 2 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre) 10% 39 3 1 3 3 2 1 Subtotal 78 6 4 4 6 3 3 Proposed FLU Driveway Trips 12,851 288 162 124 1,373 665 708 Pass-By Traffic Commercial (1.32 FAR) 29.78% 3,724 77 47 30 400 192 208 Proposed FLU New External Trips 9,127 211 115 94 973 473 500 1,772 51 30 20 196 95 101 Note: Trip generation was calculated using the following data: Daily Traffic Generation Multi -Family Residential (Apartments) [PBC] = T = 7(X) Commercial [PBC] = Ln(T) = 0.94*Ln(X) + 5.87 AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Multi -Family Residential (Apartments) [PBC] = T = 0.49(X) + 3.73; (20% in, 80% out) Commercial [PBC] = T = 1.00 (X); (61% in, 39% out) PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Multi -Family Residential (Apartments) [PBC] = T = 0.62(X); (65% in, 35% out) Commercial [PBC] = Ln(T) = 0.67*Ln(X) + 3.47; (48% in, 53% out) Pass-by Commercial [PBC] = % = 94.49 -11.61*Ln(X) © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\excel\[master-delint_cpa-1.xls]t2-tripgen LAND USE INTENSITY 7/1/2010 Commercial (1.0 FAR) Commercial (1.32 FAR) Net New External Trips (Proposed -Existing) Commercial (1.0 FAR) Commercial (1.0 FAR) Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 6 Traffic Distribution Traffic distribution is the pairing of trip ends from the subject site with other land uses in the area. These trips were assigned to the surrounding roadways based upon a review of the roadway network proposed to be in place at the time of buildout and its travel time characteristics. The distribution according to cardinal directions is: NORTH -35 percent SOUTH -25 percent EAST -20 percent WEST -20 percent Traffic Assignment The daily and peak-hour trips for the project were assigned to the surrounding roadway network proposed to be in place for each respective analysis year. Figure 2 illustrates the project traffic assignment to the surrounding roadway network. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 8 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Consistent with comprehensive plan amendment evaluation requirements, roadway segment analyses were conducted to address the traffic conditions for the existing, short-term, and long-term planning horizons. Existing (2010) Conditions This analysis is conducted using the peak season daily volumes published by Palm Beach County and FDOT (see Appendix B). It is important to note that the existing volumes for I-95 are 2009 daily volumes because 2010 volumes are not yet readily available. Because the project site is currently vacant, it utilizes the daily trip generation potential of the maximum development potential of the proposed FLU designation. Short-term (2015) Horizon This analysis is based on the Test 2 standards of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance (TPSO) and was conducted using the peakseason peak-hour traffic volumes published by Palm Beach County. Again, because the project site is currently vacant, this analysis utilizes the peak-hour trip generation potential of the maximum development potential of the proposed FLU designation. Long-term (2035) Horizon This analysis was conducted using the 2035 model volumes and the net increase in the daily trip generation potential between the existing and proposed FLU designations. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 9 EXISTING (2010) CONDITIONS As previously discussed, the site is currently vacant. Therefore, the net-increase in daily trip generation potential is 9,127 net new external daily trips. The radius of development influence and the significantly impacted roadway links were determined based on Policy 3.5-d of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. For this analysis scenario, the radius of development influence for the existing analysis is three miles because the increase in trips is between 8,001 and 12,000 net daily trips. The daily project trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius. The existing traffic volumes plus the project trips of the proposed future land use were compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Table 3, the following roadway segments are significantly impacted by the proposed FLU amendment: ̇ Linton Boulevard from Congress Avenue to Federal Highway ̇ Lindell Boulevard from SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway ̇ SW 10th Avenue from Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard ̇ Old Dixie Highway from Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street ̇ Federal Highway from NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard ̇ Ocean Boulevard North of Linton Boulevard ̇ Swinton Avenue from SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue ̇ NW 2nd Avenue from NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard Therefore, a level of service (LOS) analysis was performed to evaluate the operating conditions of the significantly impacted roadways. As indicated in Table 3, all significantly impacted roadways operate acceptably at LOS D or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 10 TABLE 3 EXISTING (2010) DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS WATERFORD EXIST LOS D 2010 PEAK PROJECT TRIPS TOTAL PROJECT IMPACT MEETS # OF GEN. SVC. SEASON DAILY DAILY v/c % SIGNIF. LOS D LANES VOLUME VOLUME1 TRIPS2 TRAFFIC THRSHLD. STANDARD? Linton Boulevard Jog Road to Sims Road 4LD 32,700 28,837 2% 183 29,020 0.89 0.56% 3.00% no -Sims Road to S. Military Trail 6LD 49,200 27,495 3% 274 27,769 0.56 0.56% 3.00% no -S. Mi litary Trail to Homewood Boulevard 6LD 49,200 37,464 8% 730 38,194 0.78 1.48% 3.00% no -Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,200 33,652 14% 1,278 34,930 0.71 2.60% 3.00% no -Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,200 40,928 26% 2,373 43,301 0.88 4.82% 3.00% yes yes I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 49,200 46,456 30% 2,738 49,194 1.00 5.57% 3.00% yes yes 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 49,200 38,788 30% 2,738 41,526 0.84 5.57% 3.00% yes yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 49,200 38,788 30% 2,738 41,526 0.84 5.57% 3.00% yes yes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 4LD 32,700 15,872 20% 1,825 17,697 0.54 5.58% 3.00% yes yes Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,700 15,872 10% 913 16,785 0.51 2.79% 3.00% no -SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L 24,500 15,139 1% 91 15,230 0.62 0.37% 3.00% no -SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 2L 15,400 15,139 1% 91 15,230 0.99 0.59% 3.00% no -SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 2L 15,400 15,139 1% 91 15,230 0.99 0.59% 3.00% no -S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 15,400 15,139 1% 91 15,230 0.99 0.59% 3.00% no -S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 2L 15,400 15,139 1% 91 15,230 0.99 0.59% 3.00% no -SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 2L 15,400 15,139 0% 0 15,139 0.98 0.00% 3.00% no -Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 15,400 3,804 30% 2,738 6,542 0.42 17.78% 3.00% yes yes Congress Avenue Clint Moore road to NW 82nd Street 6LD 49,200 28,300 4% 365 28,665 0.58 0.74% 3.00% no -NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 49,200 17,757 6% 548 18,305 0.37 1.11% 3.00% no -Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 49,200 23,248 6% 548 23,796 0.48 1.11% 3.00% no -I-95 Yamato Road to NW 82nd Street 8LX 144,300 206,383 0% 0 206,383 1.43 0.00% 1.00% no -NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX 182,600 207,532 2% 183 207,715 1.14 0.10% 3.00% no -Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX 182,600 207,532 2% 183 207,715 1.14 0.10% 3.00% no -Atlantic Avenue to Woolbright Road 10LX 182,600 177,723 0% 0 177,723 0.97 0.00% 3.00% no -SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 15,400 3,804 60% 5,476 9,280 0.60 35.56% 3.00% yes yes Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 15,400 11,986 2% 183 12,169 0.79 1.19% 3.00% no -Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L 15,400 11,986 10% 913 12,899 0.84 5.93% 3.00% yes yes Federal Highway Jeffery Street to NW 76th Street 4LD 32,698 24,382 10% 913 25,295 0.77 2.79% 3.00% no -NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 4LD 32,699 24,382 17% 1,552 25,934 0.79 4.75% 3.00% yes yes Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 32,700 30,628 2% 183 30,811 0.94 0.56% 3.00% no -Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 32,700 30,247 10% 913 31,160 0.95 2.79% 3.00% no -Note: 1I-95 AADT values represent 2009 AADT obtained from the FDOT Florida Traffic Onl ine webs i te as 2010 counts were not readi ly avai lable. 2Dai ly project trips based on maximum trip generation potenti al of proposed future land use. K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MASTER-De lint_CPA-1.xls]T3-Exist © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. % ASSIGNMENT ROADWAY SEGMENT SIGNIFICANT? 7/1/2010 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 11 TABLE 3 continued EXISTING (2010) DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS WATERFORD EXIST LOS D 2010 PEAK PROJECT TRIPS TOTAL PROJECT IMPACT MEETS # OF GEN. SVC. SEASON DAILY DAILY v/c % SIGNIF. LOS D LANES VOLUME VOLUME1 TRIPS2 TRAFFIC THRSHLD. STANDARD? SE 5th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,500 11,605 5% 456 12,061 0.41 1.55% 3.00% no -SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,500 11,605 3% 274 11,879 0.40 0.93% 3.00% no -Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,500 12,453 1% 91 12,544 0.43 0.31% 3.00% no -SE 6th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,500 13,268 5% 456 13,724 0.47 1.55% 3.00% no -SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,500 13,268 3% 274 13,542 0.46 0.93% 3.00% no -Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,500 12,963 1% 91 13,054 0.44 0.31% 3.00% no -Ocean Boulevard South of Linton Boulevard 2L 15,400 12,573 2% 183 12,756 0.83 1.19% 3.00% no -North of Linton Boulevard 2L 15,400 8,984 6% 548 9,532 0.62 3.56% 3.00% yes yes Swinton Avenue SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue 2L 15,400 9,757 6% 548 10,305 0.67 3.56% 3.00% yes yes Atlantic Avenue to Lake Ida Road 2L 15,400 10,960 2% 183 11,143 0.72 1.19% 3.00% no -Lowson Boulevard S. Mi litary Trail to Homewood Boulevard 2L 15,400 15,139 1% 91 15,230 0.99 0.59% 3.00% no -Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 2L 15,400 15,139 1% 91 15,230 0.99 0.59% 3.00% no -Atlantic Avenue Barwick Road to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,200 40,012 0% 0 40,012 0.81 0.00% 3.00% no -Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,200 44,769 0% 0 44,769 0.91 0.00% 3.00% no -I-95 to SW 8th Avenue 4LD 32,700 34,662 0% 0 34,662 1.06 0.00% 3.00% no -SW 8th Avenue to Swinton Avenue 4LD 32,700 23,780 0% 0 23,780 0.73 0.00% 3.00% no -Swinton Avenue to U.S. 1 2L 15,400 13,213 0% 0 13,213 0.86 0.00% 3.00% no -U.S. 1 to Ocean Boulevard 4L 24,500 15,267 0% 0 15,267 0.62 0.00% 3.00% no -Boca Raton Blvd/NW 2nd Ave Clint Moore Road to NW 76th Street 2L 15,400 11,454 5% 456 11,910 0.77 2.96% 3.00% no -NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L 15,400 3,804 10% 913 4,717 0.31 5.93% 3.00% yes yes Clint Moore Road Congress Avenue to Boca Raton Boulevard 4LD 32,700 10,637 1% 91 10,728 0.33 0.28% 3.00% no -Military Trail Clint Moore Road to Linton Boulevard 6LD 49,200 33,463 2% 183 33,646 0.68 0.37% 3.00% no -Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 6LD 49,200 36,155 2% 183 36,338 0.74 0.37% 3.00% no -Note: 1I-95 AADT values represent 2009 AADT obtained from the FDOT Florida Traffic Onl ine webs i te as 2010 counts were not readi ly avai lable. 2Dai ly project trips based on maximum trip generation potenti al of proposed future land use. K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MASTER-Delint_CPA-1.xls]T3-Exist © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 7/1/2010 ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGNMENT SIGNIFICANT? Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 12 SHORT-TERM (2015) HORIZON As previously noted, the site is currently vacant. Therefore, the net-increase in daily trip generation potential is 211 net new external AM peak-hour trips and 973 net new external PM peak-hour trips. For the purposes of this analysis, the same radius of development influence and significance thresholds from the existing (2010) analysis was utilized. Significance was determined in accordance with the Test 2 LOS E service volumes indicated in the Palm Beach County TPSO. As indicated in Table 4, the following roadway segments are projected to be significantly impacted by the proposed development. ̇ Linton Boulevard from Congress Avenue to Federal Highway ̇ Lindell Boulevard from SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway ̇ SW 10th Avenue from Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard ̇ Old Dixie Highway from Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street ̇ Federal Highway from NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard ̇ Ocean Boulevard North of Linton Boulevard ̇ Swinton Avenue from SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue ̇ NW 2nd Avenue from Clint Moore Road to Lindell Boulevard The AM and PM peak-hour project trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius. Background traffic was projected for all significantly impacted roadways by applying a one-percent annual growth rate plus committed development trips as indicated by the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) database. Future total volumes were then compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Table 5, all significantly impacted roadways operate acceptably at LOS E or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 13 TABLE 4 SHORT TERM (2015) SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS WATERFORD COMMITED LOS E PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IMPACT # OF GEN. SVC. % LANES VOLUME Linton Boulevard Jog Road to Sims Road 4LD 3,270 2% 4 19 0.58% no Sims Road to S. Military Trail 6LD 4,920 3% 6 29 0.59% no S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 6LD 4,920 8% 17 78 1.59% no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 4,920 14% 29 136 2.76% no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 4,920 26% 54 253 5.14% yes I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 4,920 30% 63 292 5.93% yes 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 4,920 30% 63 292 5.93% yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 4,920 30% 63 292 5.93% yes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 4LD 3,270 20% 42 195 5.96% yes Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 3,270 10% 21 97 2.97% no SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L 2,450 1% 2 10 0.41% no SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 4L 2,450 1% 2 10 0.41% no SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 4L 2,450 1% 2 10 0.41% no S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 4L 2,450 1% 2 10 0.41% no S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 4L 2,450 1% 2 10 0.41% no SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 4L 2,450 0% 0 0 0.00% no Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 1,550 30% 63 292 18.84% yes Congress Avenue Clint Moore road to NW 82nd Street 6LD 4,919 4% 9 39 0.79% no NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 4,920 6% 13 58 1.18% no Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 4,920 6% 13 58 1.18% no I-95 Yamato Road to NW 82nd Street 8LX 13,420 0% 0 0 0.00% no NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX 16,980 2% 4 19 0.11% no Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX 16,980 2% 4 19 0.11% no Atlantic Avenue to Woolbright Road 10LX 16,980 0% 0 0 0.00% no SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 1,550 60% 125 584 37.68% yes Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 1,550 2% 4 19 1.23% no Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L 1,550 10% 21 97 6.26% yes Federal Highway Jeffery Street to NW 76th Street 4LD 3,270 10% 21 97 2.97% no NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 4LD 3,270 17% 36 165 5.05% yes Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 3,270 2% 4 19 0.58% no Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 3,270 10% 21 97 2.97% no K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MASTER-Delint_CPA-1.xls]T4-Short © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGNMENT SIGNIFICANT? AM PM 7/1/2010 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 14 TABLE 4 continued SHORT TERM (2015) SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS WATERFORD COMMITED LOS E PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IMPACT # OF GEN. SVC. % LANES VOLUME SE 5th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 2,950 5% 11 49 1.66% no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 2,950 3% 6 29 0.98% no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 2,950 1% 2 10 0.34% no SE 6th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 2,950 5% 11 49 1.66% no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 2,950 3% 6 29 0.98% no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 2,950 1% 2 10 0.34% no Ocean Boulevard South of Linton Boulevard 2L 1,550 2% 4 19 1.23% no North of Linton Boulevard 2L 1,550 6% 13 58 3.74% yes Swinton Avenue SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue 2L 1,550 6% 13 58 3.74% yes Atlantic Avenue to Lake Ida Road 2L 1,550 2% 4 19 1.23% no Lowson Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 4L 2,450 1% 2 10 0.41% no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 4L 2,450 1% 2 10 0.41% no Atlantic Avenue Barwick Road to Congress Avenue 6LD 4,920 0% 0 0 0.00% no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 4,920 0% 0 0 0.00% no I-95 to SW 8th Avenue 4LD 3,270 0% 0 0 0.00% no SW 8th Avenue to Swinton Avenue 4LD 3,270 0% 0 0 0.00% no Swinton Avenue to U.S. 1 2L 1,550 0% 0 0 0.00% no U.S. 1 to Ocean Boulevard 4L 2,450 0% 0 0 0.00% no Boca Raton Blvd/NW 2nd Ave Clint Moore Road to NW 76th Street 2L 1,550 5% 11 49 3.16% yes NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L 1,550 10% 21 97 6.26% yes Clint Moore Road Congress Avenue to Boca Raton Boulevard 4LD 3,270 1% 2 10 0.31% no Military Trail Clint Moore Road to Linton Boulevard 6LD 4,920 2% 4 19 0.39% no Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 6LD 4,920 2% 4 19 0.39% no K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MASTER-Delint_CPA-1.xls]T4-Short © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. PM SIGNIFICANT? 7/1/2010 ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGNMENT AM Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 15 TABLE 5 SHORT TERM (2015) LINK ANALYSIS WATERFORD COMMITED LOS E PROJ TRIPS 2009 Prevailing Applied Historic Committed 2015 Bckgrnd 2015 Total 2015 Meets # OF GEN. SVC. Traffic Growth Growth Vol. Growth Volumes Volume Volume v/c Test 2 LANES VOLUME AM PM Rate Rate AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM Standard? Linton Boulevard Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 4,920 54 253 2,882 2,977 -0.31% 1.00% 144 149 117 217 3143 3343 3197 3596 0.73 yes I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 4,920 63 292 2,941 3,540 -0.10% 1.00% 147 177 248 378 3336 4095 3399 4387 0.89 yes 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 4,920 63 292 2,347 2,985 -1.36% 1.00% 117 149 199 306 2663 3440 2726 3732 0.76 yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 4,920 63 292 2,347 2,985 -1.36% 1.00% 117 149 186 257 2650 3391 2713 3683 0.75 yes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 4LD 3,270 42 195 895 1,381 -3.70% 1.00% 45 69 130 186 1070 1636 1112 1831 0.56 yes Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 1,550 63 292 286 367 -5.79% 1.00% 14 18 81 101 381 486 444 778 0.50 yes SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 1,550 125 584 286 367 -5.79% 1.00% 14 18 81 101 381 486 506 1070 0.69 yes Old Dixie Highway Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L 1,550 21 97 932 1,054 -0.74% 1.00% 47 53 26 43 1005 1150 1026 1247 0.80 yes Federal Highway NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 4LD 3,270 36 165 1,806 2,180 -4.82% 1.00% 90 109 153 220 2049 2509 2085 2674 0.82 yes Ocean Boulevard North of Linton Boulevard 2L 1,550 13 58 528 742 -7.60% 1.00% 26 37 6 14 560 793 573 851 0.55 yes Swinton Avenue SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue 2L 1,550 13 58 625 796 0.02% 1.00% 31 40 69 106 725 942 738 1000 0.65 yes Boca Raton Blvd/NW 2nd Ave Clint Moore Road to NW 76th Street 2L 1,550 11 49 998 1,060 -4.21% 1.00% 50 53 81 101 1129 1214 1140 1263 0.81 yes NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L 1,550 21 97 290 400 -5.79% 1.00% 15 20 15 26 320 446 341 543 0.35 yes K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\a mb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MASTER-Delint_CPA-1.xls]T5-Test 2 © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT 7/1/2010 AM PM Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 16 LONG-TERM (2035) HORIZON The net-increase in daily trip generation potential between the existing and proposed FLU designations is 1,772 net new external daily trips. The radius of development influence and the significantly impacted roadway links were determined based on Policy 3.5-d of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. For this analysis scenario, the radius of development influence for the existing analysis is one mile because the increase in trips is between 1,001 and 4,000 daily trips. Year 2035 model volumes (see Appendix C) were obtained from the Palm Beach County MPO for each of the study roadways within the one-mile radius. Then, the model volumes were adjusted to AADT by applying the model output conversion factor (MOCF). The daily project trips were then assigned to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius. The future total volumes associated with proposed future land use were then compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Table 6, the following roadway segments are significantly impacted by the proposed FLU amendment. ̇ Lindell Boulevard from SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway ̇ SW 10th Avenue from Lindell Avenue to Linton Boulevard Therefore, a level of service (LOS) analysis was performed to evaluate the operating conditions of the significantly impacted roadways. As indicated in Table 7, all significantly impacted roadways are projected to operate acceptably at LOS D or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 17 TABLE 6 LONG TERM (2035) DAILY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS WATERFORD ADOPTED LOS D PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IMPACT # OF GEN. SVC. DAILY % SIGNIF. LANES VOLUME TRIPS1 THRSHLD. Linton Boulevard Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,200 14% 248 0.50% 3.00% no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,200 26% 461 0.94% 3.00% no I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 49,200 30% 532 1.08% 3.00% no 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 49,200 30% 532 1.08% 3.00% no SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 49,200 30% 532 1.08% 3.00% no Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 6LD 49,200 20% 354 0.72% 3.00% no Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,700 10% 177 0.54% 3.00% no SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L 24,500 1% 18 0.07% 3.00% no SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 4L 15,400 1% 18 0.12% 3.00% no SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 4L 15,400 1% 18 0.12% 3.00% no S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 4L 15,400 1% 18 0.12% 3.00% no S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 4L 15,400 1% 18 0.12% 3.00% no SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 4L 15,400 0% 0 0.00% 3.00% no Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 15,400 30% 532 3.45% 3.00% yes Congress Avenue NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 49,200 6% 106 0.22% 3.00% no Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 49,200 6% 106 0.22% 3.00% no I-95 NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX 182,600 2% 35 0.02% 2.00% no Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX 182,600 2% 35 0.02% 2.00% no SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 15,400 60% 1063 6.90% 3.00% yes Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 15,400 2% 35 0.23% 3.00% no Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L 15,400 10% 177 1.15% 3.00% no Federal Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 32,700 2% 35 0.11% 2.00% no Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 32,700 10% 177 0.54% 3.00% no Lowson Boulevard Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 4L 15,400 1% 18 0.12% 3.00% no Boca Raton Boulevard NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L 15,400 10% 177 1.15% 3.00% no Note: 1Da i ly project trips based on di fference between maximum trip generation potential of exis ting and proposed future land uses . K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MASTER-Delint_CPA-1.xls]T6-2035 © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGNMENT SIGNIFICANT? 7/1/2010 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 18 TABLE 7 LONG TERM (2035) DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS WATERFORD ADOPTED LOS D PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IMPACT 2035 2035 TOTAL MEETS # OF GEN. SVC. DAILY % SIGNIF. MODEL MOCF BACKGROUND DAILY v/c LOS D LANES VOLUME TRIPS1 THRSHLD. VOLUME AADT TRAFFIC STANDARD? Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 15,400 30% 532 3.45% 3.00% yes 5,700 0.95 5,415 5,947 0.386 yes SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 15,400 60% 1063 6.90% 3.00% yes 10,800 0.95 10,260 11,323 0.735 yes 1Dai ly project trips based on difference between maximum trip generation potential of exi s ting and proposed future land uses . K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MASTER-Delint_CPA-1.xls]T7-2035 © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGNMENT SIGNIFICANT? 7/1/2010 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan report.doc | Page 19 CONCLUSION The foregoing comprehensive plan traffic analysis has been conducted to evaluate the proposed future land use designation change from the existing transitional future land use to the proposed general commercial future land use on the site located on Alta Meadows Lane approximately 550 feet south of Lindell Boulevard in the City of Delray Beach, Florida. Based on the analyses conducted for each of the three planning horizons required for comprehensive plan amendment analyses (existing, short-term, and long-term), each significantly impacted roadway is projected to operate acceptably. Therefore, based on the analyses within this study, the future land use amendment is expected to continue to allow the significantly impacted roadways to operate acceptably upon buildout of the proposed development site. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #17 Marketplace of Delray Annexation, FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Staff Report SD #17 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission on a City initiated Voluntary Annexation, Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment from Palm Beach County CH-8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential density of 8 units per acre) to City GC (General Commercial), and rezoning from County GC (General Commercial) to City PC (Planned Commercial) for an approximate 30.26 acre site for “The Marketplace of Delray”, an existing shopping Center with outparcels. The subject property is located at northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail (see location map and table attached). Pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 2.2.2(E)(6), the Local Planning Agency (Planning & Zoning Board) shall review and make a recommendation to the City Commission with respect to annexation, FLUM amendment, and Rezoning of any property within the City. BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The property under consideration is a 30.26 shopping center with several outparcels which was constructed between 1980 and 1986. On April 8, 1980, a water service agreement between Federal Plaza Ltd (then owners of the subject property) and the City of Delray Beach was executed for approximately 28 acres of the subject property. The 1980 Water Service Agreement did not include the voluntary annexation clause nor did it include some of the outparcels. In August of 2000, the Marketplace of Delray, Inc., requested seven additional water connections for newly converted retail space. As there was an urgency to open the new businesses, the City Commission approved a temporary water service agreement on November 7, 2000, to allow the applicant to provide service to the new tenants, with the understanding that a new water service agreement would be executed. On June 18, 2002, the Water Service Agreement was modified to include the entire shopping center and all outparcels. The water service agreement included the consent for future annexation and assessment of a storm water assessment fee. The agreement states, “unless the customer agrees to an earlier date, the City agrees not to approve an annexation ordinance under this agreement until January 15, 2010.” The current property owner has been notified of the proposed annexation proceedings. The property is bordered to the north by the LWDD L-33 Canal and the Fountains of Delray Apartments and Fountain Center; to the east by Delray Square Shopping Center; to the west by Carnival Flea Market and High Point of Delray West; and to the south by Pines West Plaza. The subject property is located within the “Four Corners” overlay district at the intersection of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail. The subject property is under the jurisdiction of Palm Beach County, but in a designated annexation area for the City of Delray Beach. The property is located in the City's Planning Area, known as Annexation Area “D”, as noted in Future Land Use Element Policy B-3.5 of the Comprehensive Plan. The City’s advisory FLUM designation for the property is GC (General Commercial). The proposed FLUM amendment to implement the advisory designation and annexation (pursuant to the referenced Agreement for Water Service) with initial zoning of PC (Planned Commercial) were initiated by the City Commission on July 6, 2010, and are now before the Board for action. FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT ANALYSIS Current Land Use Designation: The current land use map designation for the Marketplace of Delray is County CH-8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential density of 8 units per acre). The current City “advisory” designation is GC (General Commercial). The City’s FLUM designation as initially contained on the City’s Future Land Use Map adopted by Ordinance 82-89 in November 1989, (and as formally amended subsequently) are deemed to be advisory until an official Future Land Use Map Amendment is processed. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 2 Requested Land Use Designation: The requested Future Land Use Map Designation is GC (General Commercial). CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Designated Annexation Area: The properties to be annexed are located within designated Annexation Area “D" on the west side of Military Trail, north of Atlantic Avenue. Annexation of the territory is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy B-3.5, which calls for annexation of eligible properties through voluntary annexations as the opportunities arise. Land Use Analysis: Consistency Between the City and County Land Use Designations: The proposed City Future Land Use Map Designation for the property is GC (General Commercial). The existing County Future Land Use Map Designation for the property is CH-8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential of 8 units per acre). The City’s GC Future Land Use Map Designation is consistent with the existing County CH-8 designation in that the city’s description of the General Commercial designation states, “This designation is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services”. It is further stated, “Residential uses may comprise up to 15% of the total floor area of the General Commercial Land Use designation. Residential uses are permitted either in conjunction with a commercial use, or as a standalone use subject to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre. Areas with the General Commercial designation, located within a workforce housing overlay district, may also exceed 12 units per acre up to a maximum of 30 units per acre within the Four Corners Overlay District and 18 units per acre within the infill workforce housing area, by obtaining density bonuses through the provision of workforce housing units”. Similarly to the County’s CH-8 designation, the City’s GC designation allows for mixed-use development with general commercial and residential uses. Adjacent Future Land Use Map Designations, Zoning Designations and Land Uses: The following zoning designations and uses abut the subject properties: FLUM Designation Zoning District Use North: MD (Medium Density Residential 5-12 du/ac) and TRN (Transitional) RM (Medium Density Residential) and NC (Neighborhood Commercial) Fountains at Delray Beach Apartments Fountain Center South: GC (General Commercial) PC (Planned Commercial) Pines West Plaza East: GC (General Commercial) PC (Planned Commercial) Delray Square Plaza West: CH-8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential density of 8 units per acre) GC (General Commercial) High Point of Delray West and Carnival Flea Market Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 3 The proposed FLUM designation and rezoning of the subject properties will maintain consistency and compatibility with the adjacent development patterns. Allowable Land Uses: Under the proposed General Commercial (GC) Land Use Map designation, commercial zoning districts which accommodate shopping center developments are allowed. The proposed zoning of PC is consistent with the proposed GC FLUM designation and compatible with the adjacent developments to the west, south and east. REQUIRED FINDINGS: LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CHAPTER 3: Pursuant to LDR Section 3.1.1, prior to approval of Land Use applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Future Land Use Map: The resulting use of land or structures must be allowed in the zoning district within which the land is situated and said zoning must be consistent with the applicable land use designation as shown on the Future Land Use Map. Pursuant to Land Development Regulations Section 3.1.1 (A) (Future Land Use Map), all land uses and resulting structures must be allowed in the zoning district within which the land is situated, and said zoning must be consistent with the land use designation as shown on the Future Land Use Map. The proposed Planned Commercial (GC) zoning district is consistent with the proposed GC (General Commercial) FLUM designation. Retail and other commercial activities established on large sites in a well planned, functional, and aesthetically pleasing manner are allowed in the Planned Commercial (PC) zoning district as a permitted use. Based on the above, positive findings can be made with respect to FLUM consistency. Concurrency: Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standards. Provision of Services: When annexation of property occurs, services are to be provided in a manner which is consistent with services provided to other similar properties already in the City (Future Land Use Element Policy B-3.1). The proposal involves amending the FLUM designation from Palm Beach County CH-8 (Commercial High with an underlying high Residential, 8 du/ac) to City GC (General Commercial) and rezoning from County GC (General Commercial) to City PC (Planned Commercial) for an approximately 30.26 acres site for The Market Place of Delray, an existing shopping Center with outparcels. Since the City’s advisory FLUM designation of GC, as shown on the existing Future Land Use Map, has been in place since 1990, this amendment is just an implementation of current comprehensive plan policies and there is no change in development potential. However, a general description of Concurrency findings with respect to Police, Solid Waste, Traffic and Water and Sewer are discussed below: Police: This property is currently serviced by the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, located at 345 South Congress, which serves the South County area. The property is within Sheriff Patrol zone 7. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 4 Zone 7 is bordered by Jog Road on the west, the Delray Beach City Limits on the east, and Atlantic Avenue on the north and Clint Moore Road to the south. One officer is assigned to a particular zone during a shift (three shifts per day). The City of Delray Beach’s Police Department has 14 cars per shift patrolling a 15 square mile area during the day and 15 cars during the night; and as a result, response time will be significantly improved upon annexation. Annexation will not require additional manpower since the police currently patrol in close proximity to these parcels. Fire and Emergency Services: The annexation of this property will not require additional manpower. The municipal area is served by Fire Station No. 4 (Barwick Road and Lake Ida Road). With annexation, the property will receive an improved response time from the current 5.5 minutes of the County’s Fire Department (Fire Station #42 located on Hagen Ranch Road close to the Turnpike) to 2.5 minutes for the City’s Fire Department (Fire Station #4 located at Barwick and Lake Ida Road). Water: Municipal water service is available via connection to a 12” water main located along Military Trail and West Atlantic Avenue. Ten fire hydrants are spread out through the property including one fire hydrant the east side of Military and another one the south side of West Atlantic Avenue. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that treatment capacity is available at the City’s Water Treatment Plant at build-out. Sewer: Sewer service is available via an 8” sewer main located along the perimeter of the site and a lift station located on the north side of the Lake Worth District Drainage (LWDD) canal. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that treatment capacity is available at the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Streets: The subject properties can be accessed via West Atlantic Avenue and from Military Trail. West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail are under the jurisdiction of Palm Beach County and the jurisdictional responsibility and the associated maintenance of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail will not change upon annexation. Based upon the above a positive finding with respect to traffic concurrency can be made. Solid Waste: The Marketplace of Delray shopping plaza has nine retail/commercial establishments including eight outside parcels and one large internal parcel. Therefore, the subject property will have a relatively important impact on this level of service standard. The solid waste authority has indicated they have sufficient capacity to service this area. The service provider will not change with annexation, as described later in this report. Consistency: The requested designation is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. The following applicable Comprehensive Plan objective and policies are noted: Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7: Amendments to the FLUM must be based upon the findings listed below, and must be supported by data and analysis that demonstrate compliance with these findings: Demonstrated Need --That there is a need for the requested land use. The need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, annexation into the municipal boundaries, or similar circumstances. The need must be supported by data and analysis verifying the changing demographics or other circumstances. This requirement shall not apply to requests for the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 5 FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space; nor shall it apply to FLUM changes associated with annexations when the City’s advisory FLUM designation is being applied, or when the requested designation is of a similar intensity to the advisory designation. However, the findings described in the remainder of this policy must be addressed with all FLUM amendments. The proposal is associated with the annexation of an unincorporated property and requires changing the FLUM designation from County to City. Since the City’s advisory FLUM designation is being being applied to the property in association with the annexation, the demonstrated need does not apply. Future Land Use Element Objective A-1: Property shall be developed or redeveloped, in a manner so that the future use, intensity and density are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; encourage affordable goods and services; are complementary to and compatible with adjacent land uses; and fulfill remaining land use needs. The subject property does not have any unique environmental characteristics that would require mitigation measures. The current County FLUM designation is CH-8 (Commercial High with an underlying High Residential, 8 units/acre) and the proposed City designation is GC (General Commercial). It is noted that the proposed PC (Planned Commercial) zoning designation would allow commercial/retail developments as does the county zoning designation of CH-8 (Commercial High with an underlying High Residential, 8 units/acre). It is also noted that the proposed GC (General Commercial) FLUM designation is compatible with the existing developments to the south, Delray Commons and Points West Shopping Plaza; to the east, Hess Gas Station, Walgreens, and Delray Square Shopping Plaza; and to the west, Carnival Flea Market of Delray. It is also compatible existing Fountains at Delray Beach Apartment complex and the small retail center to the north. Compatibility --The requested designation will be compatible with the existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. As noted above, compatibility has been identified under Future Land Use Element Objective A-1. Compliance --Development under the requested designation will comply with the provisions and requirements of the Land Development Regulations. The current development for The Marketplace of Delray was processed both through the County and the City for consistency with the LDRs as part of the water service agreement process. Any future development of the subject property will be submitted to the site plan review process and will be reviewed for compliance with the LDRs. At this time, no issues have been identified which would prohibit compliance with the requirements of the proposed PC (Planned Commercial) zoning district for the Marketplace of Delray development. ANNEXATION ANALYSIS Florida Statues Governing Voluntary Annexations: Pursuant to the Florida Statutes 171.044 “the owner or owners of real properties in an unincorporated area of the County, which is contiguous to a municipality and reasonably compact may petition the governing body of said municipality that said property be annexed to the municipality”. Pursuant to F. S. 171.044 (5) “land shall not be annexed through voluntary annexation when such annexation results in the creation of enclaves”. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 6 As noted throughout the report, the Marketplace Development is a voluntary annexation which is consented to through an executed water service agreement. Chapter 171.046, Florida Statutes (2004), provides for annexation of certain enclaves by entering into an Interlocal Agreement between the Municipality and the County having jurisdiction over such enclave; and limits annexation by Interlocal Agreement to enclaves of ten (10) acres or less in size. Financial Impacts: Effect upon Annexed Property: the following table depicts the current assessed value and total (County) taxes for the subject property: For the 2009 tax year, the subject property had an assessed value of $25,888,048.00. With the change from County to City jurisdiction, the following taxes and rates will be affected: THE MARKETPLACE OF DELRAY ADVALOREM COUNTY COUNTY WITH CITY CITY TAXES TAXES MILLAGE ANNEXATION TAXES MILLAGE Fire/Rescue MSTU 89,523.46 3.45810005 DELETE 0.00 0.000000 Palm Beach County Lib. 12,866.36 0.49700001 DELETE 0.00 0.000000 Palm Beach Co.Lib.Debt 1,418.67 0.05480019 DELETE 0.00 0.000000 Florida Inland Navegation 893.13 0.03449970 893.13 0.034500 Health Care District 29,644.41 1.14510024 29,644.41 1.145100 Palm Beach County 112,457.67 4.34399959 112,457.67 4.344000 Palm Beach County Debt 5,628.06 0.21739994 5,628.06 0.217400 Children Service Council 17,857.57 0.68979979 17,857.57 0.689800 Public Schools Loc.Board 64,668.35 2.49800000 64,668.35 2.49800000 Public Schools State Law 141,995.93 5.48500000 141,995.93 5.48500000 SFWMD District 13,839.74 0.53459960 13,839.74 0.534600 SFWMD Everglades Const. 2,314.39 0.08939994 2,314.39 0.089400 City of Delray Beach Added (City) 186,135.07 7.190000 City of Delray Beach Debt Added (City) 13,762.09 0.531600 SUB-TOTAL $493,108 19.0477 Difference* $589,196 22.7594 3.7117 THE MARKETPLACE OF DELRAY PCN TAXABLE VALUE 2009 PBC ADVAL. TAXES PBC NONADVAL. TAXES TOTAL PBC TAXES PBC COUNT Y MILL. ADVAL. CITY OF DELRAY TAXES NONADVAL. CITY OF DELRAY TAXES CITY OF DELRAY BEACH MILLAGE TOTAL CITY OF DELRAY TAXES DIFFERENCE 424614000005010 17,000,000.0323,811.00 97,355.00 421,166.00 19.0477 386,909.78 18,701 22.7594 405,610.42 -15,555.58 424614000005500 1,277,112.024,326.00 4,256.00 28,582.00 19.0477 29,066.30 18,701 22.7594 47,766.94 19,184.94 424614000005510 1,113,658.021,213.00 911.00 22,124.00 19.0477 25,346.19 18,701 22.7594 44,046.83 21,922.83 424614000005520 1,522,447.0 28,999.00 910.00 29,909.00 19.0477 34,649.98 18,701 22.7594 53,350.62 23,441.62 424614000005530 1,064,524.0 20,277.00 5,846.00 26,123.00 19.0477 24,227.93 18,701 22.7594 42,928.57 16,805.57 424614000005540 1,217,770.023,196.00 873.00 24,069.00 19.0477 27,715.71 18,701 22.7594 46,416.35 22,347.35 424614000005550 1,127,665.021,479.00 262.00 21,741.00 19.0477 25,664.98 18,701 22.7594 44,365.62 22,624.62 424614000005560 719,218.0 13,699.00 4,210.00 17,909.00 19.0477 16,368.97 18,701 22.7594 35,069.61 17,160.61 424614000005570 845,654.0 16,108.00 4,689.00 20,797.00 19.0477 19,246.58 18,701 22.7594 37,947.22 17,150.22 SUB-TOTAL 25,888,048.0 $493,108.00 $119,312.00 $612,420.00 19.0477 $589,196.41 168,306 $7527,25.0725.1964 $145,082.16 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 7 * Total tax millage in the county is 19.0477 mills. If annexed into the City, the total millage would be 22.7594 mills, a difference of 3.7117 mills. The current yearly ad valorem and non ad valorem taxes are $612,420. With annexation, the yearly ad valorem taxes will increase to $757,502.16 (612,420+145,082.16=757,502.16); a tax difference of $145,082.16. In addition to property taxes, the following Non Ad Valorem fiscal responsibility will apply: Delray Beach Storm Water Utility – This assessment is based upon the percentage of impervious area of the structures, buildings, parking areas, etc. If the property is developed as a multiple family complex or is subdivided for residential purposes, an assessment of $54.00 per unit would be applied. A 25% discount from the assessment is available since the property is within the Lake Worth Drainage District. An additional 25% may be available if drainage is retained on site. Solid Waste Authority – This annexation area is serviced under a contract with Waste Management. The City’s solid waste removal contract is also through Waste Management. Pursuant to Florida Statute 171.062 (4)(a) “ if a party has an exclusive franchise which is in effect for at least six months prior to the initiation of an annexation, the franchise may continue to provide such services to the annexed area for five years or the remainder of the franchise term whichever is shorter”. Thus, the waste service provider will not change with annexation. The Marketplace of Delray property is currently providing a solid waste disposal fee to the County. After annexation, an assessment fee of approximately $4,477 per year for this service will be paid to the City. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON THE PROPERTY FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS AD VALOREM TAXES 2010 + $145,082.16 City Mills. PB County Mills 22.75940 -19.04770 = 3.7117 NON AD VALOREM TAXES 2010 Stormwater Assessment $14,223.02 Solid Waste Collection $4,477.62 WATER & SEWER UTILITY FEES $0.00 ANNUAL FINANCIAL IMPACT: + $163,782.80 SERVICE CONSIDERATIONS Fire Response + Faster response from an estimated 5.5 minutes (County) to 2.5 minutes (City). Emergency Medical + Faster response from an estimated 5.5 Services (EMS) minutes (County) to 2.5 minutes (City). Police + Better response based upon more officers in field; 14 patroll cars per shift daytime, 15 patroll cars during the night. Code Enforcement + Pro-active vs reactive opportunity to work with property owners. Fiscal Impacts: As shown on the above table, annexation into the City, would generate an additional $145,082.16 in ad valorem taxes per year from this property. With future redevelopment, additional revenues will be realized through increased assessment value, building permit fees, the annual collection of the storm water assessment fee, as well as utility taxes (9.5% electric, 7% telephone) and franchise fees on electric, telephone, and cable. As shown on the Table below, the total fiscal impact to the City is approximately $214,120.17. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 8 FISCAL IMPACT TO THE CITY AD VALOREM TAXES 2010 City of Delray Beach 7.1900 Mills $186,135.07 City of Delray Beach Debt 0.5316 Mills $13,762.09 SUB-TOTAL $199,897.15 NON-AD VALOREM TAXES Storm Water Assessment $14,223.02 SUB-TOTAL $214,120.17 PARK AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE $500 per unit $0.00 TOTAL $214,120.17 ZONING ANALYSIS Future Land Use Map Consistency, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Compliance with the development criteria of the LDRs were previously discussed under the “Future Land Use Map Amendment Analysis” section of this report. Compliance with the Land Development Regulations with respect to Standards for Rezoning Actions and Rezoning Findings are discussed below for each property. The proposed City zoning designation is PC (Planned Commercial) while the current County zoning designation is CG (General Commercial). The surrounding zoning designations are: PC (Planned Commercial) to the east and south; RM (Medium Density Residential) and NC (Neighborhood Commercial) to the north; and County GC (General Commercial) to the west. Section 3.2.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions): standard “A”, “B”, “C”, and “E” are not applicable with respect to this rezoning request. The applicable performance standards of Section 3.2.2 is as follows: D) That the rezoning shall result in allowing land uses which are deemed compatible with adjacent and nearby land use both existing and proposed; or that if an incompatibility may occur, that sufficient regulations exist to properly mitigate adverse impacts from the new use. Compatibility is not a concern, as the property currently contains a shopping center, which has existed at this location since 1980. The initial PC (Planned Commercial) zoning designation will accommodate the existing shopping center as a permitted use. There is no development proposal associated with this request. Compatibility of any future development proposals with the adjacent developments will be appropriately addressed with review of such future developments. Section 2.4.5 (D) (5) (Rezoning Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5 (D) (5), Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(D) (5), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the City Commission must make a finding that the rezoning fulfills one of the reasons for which the rezoning change is being sought. These reasons include the following: (a) That the zoning had previously been changed, or was originally established, in error; Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 9 (b) That there has been a change in circumstances which make the current zoning inappropriate; or (c) That the requested zoning is of similar intensity as allowed under the Future Land Use Map and that it is more appropriate for the property based upon circumstances particular to the site and/or neighborhood. The property is developed and the existing development is allowed under the proposed PC zoning district. As stated above, the project is located within the “Four Corners Overlay District”. With review of the annexation request, a site visit was conducted and did reveal some code violations, which primarily relate to landscape and perimeter buffer deficiencies. Any future development or redevelopment will be required to comply with the Land Development Regulations. In addition to the above, buildings within the “Four Corners Overlay District” require a minimum floor area of 4,000 sq. ft. per building. Based upon the site plan approved through the County, three (3) outparcel buildings have been constructed with floor areas less than 4,000 sq. ft. The existing structures are considered nonconforming and can continue. However, should a site plan modification be requested, the building square footages cannot be decreased. Finally, it is noted that a “gasoline station” is not an allowed use within the Four Corners Overlay District. The existing gasoline station will be classified as an existing non-conforming use and thus subject to the regulations pertaining to non-conforming uses contain in Article 1.3 of the Land Development Regulations. Items “b” and “c” are the basis for which the rezoning should be granted. The properties are in the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County. However, they are also within the City of Delray Beach future annexation area. The annexation requires that an appropriate City zoning designation be applied to the property. The PC zoning designation is of similar intensity as that allowed under the proposed City GC and existing County CH-8 land use designations. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 2.4.5(D) (5). REVIEW BY OTHERS The subject properties are not in an area that requires review by the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) or Downtown Development Authority (DDA). Palm Beach County Notice: On June 10, 2010, Palm Beach County Administrator and Palm Beach County Planning Division were notified of the City’s intent to annex this property. The County has responded that it has no objections to the proposed annexation. IPARC Notice: Notice of the Future Land Use Amendment has also been provided to the Interlocal Plan Amendment Review Committee (IPARC) which distributes the information to adjacent municipalities. Lake Worth Drainage District: On July 9, 2010, Lake Worth Drainage District was notified of the City’s intent to annex this property. Lake Worth Drainage District has submitted a letter stating that they do not have any objections to the proposed annexation. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 10 Courtesy Notices: Special courtesy notices were provided to the following homeowners and civic associations: Neighborhood Advisory Council High Point of Delray West PROD (Progressive Residents of Delray) Sunset Pines Coconut Key HOA Highland Trailer Co. Public Notice: Formal public notice has been provided to the affected property owners as well as property owners within a 500' radius of the subject property. Additional letters of support or objection, if any, will be presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION Accommodating the annexation of this property is consistent with the City’s program for annexation of territory within its planning and service area. For the Marketplace of Delray property, the City’s advisory GC (General Commercial)) Land Use Map Designation is consistent with the County’s CH-8 (Commercial High with an underlying High Residential, 8 units per acre) designation in that it is compatible with the existing land use designations and the adjacent development pattern of the adjacent development. This Future Land Use Map designation is being proposed concurrently with a request for initial zoning of PC (Planned Commercial) District which is also compatible with the surrounding development pattern. The annexation will provide better Police, Fire, EMS and Code Enforcement services than under County jurisdiction. The properties will experience an increase in ad valorem taxes. The City will receive additional revenue from property taxes, in addition to storm water assessment fees utility taxes, franchise fees, and licensing fees upon development. Based upon the above, the proposed Annexation, Future Land Use Map Amendment and associated Rezoning application should be approved. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for a City initiated Voluntary Annexation, Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment from Palm Beach County CH-8 (Commercial High with an underlying High Density Residential, 8 du/ac) to City GC (General Commercial) and rezoning from County GC (General Commercial) to City GC (General Commercial) for a 30.26 acres site for the Marketplace of Delray, an existing shopping Center, located at the northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the requests and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D) (5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Development Regulations. C. Move a recommendation of denial to the City Commission for a City initiated Voluntary Annexation, Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment from Palm Beach County CH-8 (Commercial High with an underlying High Density Residential, 8 du/ac) to City GC (General Commercial) and rezoning from County GC (General Commercial) to City GC (General Commercial) for a 30.26 acres site for the Marketplace of Delray, an existing shopping Center located at the northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 11 finding that the requests is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and does not meet the criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D) (5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Development Regulations. RECOMMENDED ACTION D. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for a City initiated Voluntary Annexation, Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment from Palm Beach County CH-8 (Commercial High with an underlying High Density Residential, 8 du/ac) to City GC (General Commercial) and rezoning from County GC (General Commercial) to City GC (General Commercial) for a 30.26 acres site for the Marketplace of Delray, an existing shopping Center located at the northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the requests and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D) (5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Development Regulations. Staff Report Prepared by: Jasmin Allen and Estelio Breto Attachments: Location Map, Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #18 Marketplace of Delray Existing and Proposed Colored Future Land Use Maps SD #18 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #19 Lintco Development FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Staff Report SD #19 I T E M S B E F O R E T H E B O A R D The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission on a proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment from MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/ac) to GC (General Commercial) and a proposed zoning change from RM (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) for twelve (12) individual and contiguous properties. All twelve (12) of the subject properties are vacant and visible from Linton Boulevard, which is a major thoroughfare serving the City of Delray Beach. Although there is a condominium development north of these properties, it is bordered on the east and south by commercial uses. To the west, there is a single family residence and a fire station. The proposed changes seek to apply future land use and zoning designations which are more consistent with the prevailing commercial development along Linton Boulevard. B A C K G R O U N D A N A L Y S I S The subject properties are located in a Subdivision of Section 20, Township 46 and Range 43, according to the public records of Palm Beach County, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Pages 4 and 5 on March 25, 1910. The twelve parcels total approximately 7.08 acres in size and are currently undeveloped. The parcels were annexed to the City of Delray Beach on October 11, 1988 via City Ordinance Number 115-88. On December 6, 2005, the City Commission approved Ordinance Number 56-05, which changed the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation from RDA-3 (Redevelopment Area-3) to MD (Multiple Family Residential) for the parcels. Also on December 6, 2005, the City Commission approved Ordinance Number 60-05 which changed the zoning from R-1-A (Single Family Residential) to RM (Multiple Family Residential). The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment is being processed as a part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1. Plan Amendment, including text and map changes, was initiated by the Planning and Zoning Board on June 21, 2010 and by the City Commission on July 6, 2010. Action on this amendment by the Planning and Zoning Board is scheduled for July 19, 2010. The City Commission transmittal hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, August 3, 2010. Adoption of Comprehensive Plan amendment 2010-1 is scheduled for October 5, 2010, or for December 7, 2010 if an ORC (Objection, Response and Comments) Report is issued by the State. On June 4, 2010, Lintco, LLC requested a land use map amendment to change the Future Land Use Map designation from MD to GC and to change the zoning from RM to GC for the subject twelve parcels, which is now before the Board for consideration. F U T U R E L A N D U S E M A P A M E N D M E N T A N A L Y S I S Current Land Use Designation: The current Future Land Use Map designation for the property is MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/ac). Requested Land Use Designation: The requested Future Land Use Designation is to GC (General Commercial). The Future Land Use Map amendment is being processed concurrently with an associated Comprehensive Plan text amendment to modify the description of the General Commercial designation to limit nonresidential development on the property to a maximum FAR of 0.36. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is currently permitted for nonresidential uses in the General Commercial designation. Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Page 2 REQUIRED FINDINGS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CHAPTER 3 – PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: Pursuant to LDR Section 3.1.1, prior to approval of Land Use applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Future Land Use Map: The resulting use of land or structures must be allowed in the zoning district within which the land is situated and said zoning must be consistent with the applicable land use designation as shown on the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use Map Amendment request is to change the existing MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/ac) designation to GC (General Commercial). The General Commercial FLUM designation, as defined in the Comprehensive Plan, is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes (i.e. retail, office, services). A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.36, which is being proposed for the subject property, will be accomplished through a Comprehensive Plan text amendment modifying the description of the General Commercial designation. As noted above, this text amendment is being processed concurrently with the FLUM and Rezoning change requests. The proposed change is to accommodate General Commercial uses for future development of the vacant land. The proposed GC (General Commercial) zoning, in combination with the proposed GC (General Commercial) FLUM designation may allow for the best and highest use of the property. Development under the proposed zoning and land use designation would be more in line with existing developments along Linton Boulevard. The existing RM (Multiple Family Residential) zoning accompanied with the existing MD (Medium Density Residential) FLUM designation does not allow commercial uses. The GC (General Commercial) zoning allows more flexibility in the development of the property. A commercial or mixed-use development would be more appropriate on a highly commercialized corridor like Linton Boulevard. Concurrency: Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standards. Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs (including public schools), of the requested land use and/or development application, will not exceed the ability of the City and The School District of Palm Beach County to fund and provide, or to require the provision of needed capital improvements to maintain the Levels of Service Standards established in Table CI-GOP-1 of the adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of Delray Beach. The 7.08 acres within the proposed Lintco Development site has a current Future Land Use designation of MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/acre). The Future Land Use Map amendment is being processed to change the FLUM designation to GC (General Commercial) and a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment is being processed concurrently to allow mixed-use development on the property at a nonresidential intensity lower than that currently allowed within Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Page 3 the GC designation. The maximum intensity for nonresidential uses within the proposed overlay district will be set at an FAR of 0.36. The concurrency analysis assumes development of the entire property within the proposed overlay district at the maximum intensity allowed under the amended description for the General Commercial designation. As shown on the following table, development under this provision would result in the addition of nonresidential development potential where none now exists. The maximum development potential with the proposed amendment would be a mixed-use project with residential development at 12 units per acre and retail development at a maximum FAR of 0.36. A comparative analysis of the maximum development potential of the property has been provided below. Table 1: Maximum Development Potential Lintco Development Overlay District EXISTING PROPOSED FLUM (acres) Maximum Development Potential FLUM (acres) Maximum Mixed Use Development Potential MD (7.08 acres) 85 Multi-Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) GC (7.08 acres) Mixed-Use 85 Multi-Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 111,026 SF Retail (FAR 0.36) Traffic: An analysis of the traffic impacts associated with the maximum development potential of a mixeduse development on the property was conducted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The entire Kimley-Horn Traffic Impact Analysis is attached as Support Document #8 within the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Report. As shown on the following table from the analysis, the new maximum land use mix will represent a net increase in potential traffic volumes. Analyses were conducted for each of the three planning horizons–existing (2009), short-term (2015) and long-term (2035). In the Conclusion Section on page 17 of the Report, the consultant indicates that “based on the analyses within this study, the future land use map amendment is expected to continue to allow the significantly impacted roadways to operate acceptably upon build-out of the development site.” Table 2: Trip Generation Comparison -Maximum Intensity Lintco Development Overlay District Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Page 4 Water & Sewer: Water treatment is provided by the City of Delray Beach at the Water Treatment Plant. The geographic service area coincides with the Planning Area plus service provided to the Town of Gulf Stream through contract as a bulk customer. The service area encompasses approximately 18 square miles. The treatment plant, with a capacity of 28 million gallons per day, was constructed in 1972 and has a programmed life of 50 years (2022). The water supply is provided from 30 active wells in four wellfields, yielding a total design capacity of 37.2 mgd. The City’s consumptive use permit currently limits the annual withdraw rate to 6.937 billion gallons which equates to an average of 19 mgd. Water demand projections for the City’s Water Service Area were calculated based on the City’s population projections multiplied by the projected per capita demands. Potable water demand projections, credits for the use of reclaimed water and the total excess/deficit for the years 2010 through 2030 are given in the following table. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum development potential with the FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36. Potable Water Demand Projections Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Service Area Population 69,335 74,504 81,114 82,233 82,556 Per Capita Use (gpd) 240 240 240 240 240 Avg. Daily Demand (MG) 16.64 17.88 19.47 19.74 19.81 Permit Base Condition (MGD) 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 Excess/(Deficit) (MGD) 2.36 1.12 (0.47) (0.74) (0.81) Alternative sources Reclaimed Water Credits for Ground Water Demand Removal 1.08 1.895 1.895 1.895 1.895 Potable demand removal 0.39 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Excess/Deficit 3.83 3.85 2.27 2.00 1.92 Notes: 1. Population projections based on Palm Beach County 2007 Population Allocation Model using March 2008 BEBR Population Projections. 2. Per capita use assumes a 10% reduction from current permitted values achieved through conservation. 3. Permit base condition as provided by SFWMD per ground water availability rule. Wastewater from the City is treated at the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWWTP), which is managed by the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board, established in 1974 through an agreement between the cities of Delray Beach and Boynton Beach. The SCRWWTP has the capacity to provide up to 24 mgd of reclaimedquality water. In 2003, the City developed a Reclaimed Water Master Plan, which identified 16 areas for reclaimed water application. The City is currently using reclaimed water to irrigate several golf courses and is installing additional transmission lines to serve other large users. Through the use of reclaimed water, the City’s 20-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Page 5 indicates that water supply facilities are planned and will be available to meet the future growth and water demands of the City of Delray Beach through the year 2030. The wastewater treatment plant was constructed in 1979, with a programmed life of 50 years (2029). Ultimate disposal is currently by ocean discharge of secondary effluent and land spreading of sludge. In late 2008, deep well injection replaced the ocean discharge except for emergency situations and DEP permitted exceptions. Also in late 2008, with completion of the Palm Beach County Biosolids Pelletization facility, land spreading of sludge is longer being used. The design capacity of the treatment plant, established by its secondary treatment capacity, is 24 mgd. This capacity is shared equally between Boynton Beach and Delray Beach. The current plant has adequate capacity to service the City’s projected population beyond the year 2025. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate wastewater treatment capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum development potential with the FLUM amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36. Since adequate capacity is available in the City’s water and wastewater systems to meet the increased demand, the proposed FLUM amendment will not impact the level of service standard for these facilities. Drainage: The adopted LOS standards for drainage is the SFWMD standard of retention of the first one inch of runoff or 2.5 inches of water storage times the percentage of impervious area. Local and Citywide drainage deficiencies are identified in the Stormwater Master Plan (Kimley-Horn, 2000). The City has programmed projects to correct the deficiencies identified in this report and achieve the Level of Service standard. Public Facilities Element Objective E-1 states: A capital improvement program directed specifically to storm drainage and runoff management has been adopted by the City Commission, and capital projects, as identified in that program, shall be implemented with funding to come from the Stormwater Utility Fee. Drainage is reviewed during the site plan application process for individual projects. Within this area of the City, drainage is usually accommodated on site via exfiltration trench systems or swale retention areas. There are no problems anticipated with obtaining South Florida Water Management District permits within the area and any additional impacts caused by increased impervious area will not affect the level of service standard. Parks & Recreation The Open Space and Recreation Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan indicates in its conclusion that “The City will have sufficient recreation facilities at build-out to meet the adopted standards.” The LOS standard for open space and recreation in the city is 3 acres per 1,000 residents. The amount of land currently provided in activity based recreation facilities, the municipal beaches, and the two public golf courses, establishes a level of service of 6.2 acres per 1,000 residents (2007), far exceeding the general guideline. A park impact fee is collected to offset any impacts that new development may have on the City’s recreational facilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, a park impact fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of a building permit for each residential unit. Since there is no net increase in the residential development potential on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36, this level of service standard is not affected. Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Page 6 Education (School Concurrency): Since there is no net increase in the residential development potential on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36, this level of service standard is not affected. Solid Waste: As shown on the following table, with the proposed amendment, the development of the property would result in a net increase of 566 tons per year in solid waste generation. In its annual capacity letter, dated January 6, 2010, the Solid Waste Authority indicates that it has sufficient capacity for concurrency management and comprehensive planning purposes. As stated in the letter, “Capacity is available for both the coming year, and the five and ten year planning periods specified in 9J-5-005(4).” Based on population projections, waste generation rate projections, waste reduction, and recycling, the Solid Waste Authority forecasts that capacity will be available at the existing landfill through approximately the year 2030. The Board of the Solid Waste Authority has authorized the initial design and permitting efforts to develop a new landfill on 1,600 acres owned by the authority. The capacity of this new landfill would extend the life of the solid waste system beyond the year 2043 or later. Table 3: Solid Waste Generation Lintco Development Overlay District Existing Maximum Development Potential Proposed Mixed-Use Maximum Development Potential 85 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 44.2 tons/yr 111,026 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 566 tons/year 85 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 44.2 tons/yr Based on the above analysis, positive findings can be made at this time with regard to concurrency for all services and facilities. Consistency: The requested designation is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. The following applicable Comprehensive Plan objective and policies are noted: Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7: Amendments to the FLUM must be based upon the findings listed below, and must be supported by data and analysis that demonstrate compliance with these findings: Demonstrated Need --That there is a need for the requested land use. The need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, annexation into the municipal boundaries, or similar circumstances. The need must be supported by data and analysis verifying the changing demographics or other circumstances. This requirement shall not apply to requests for the FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space; nor shall it apply to FLUM changes associated with annexations when the City’s Advisory FLUM designation is being applied, or when the requested designation is of a similar intensity to the Advisory designation. However, the findings described in the remainder of this policy must be addressed with all FLUM amendments. The requested GC FLUM designation will allow commercial uses, whereas only residential uses are currently allowed on the subject parcels. The proposed land use map change is more consistent Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Page 7 with the existing character of the commercial nature of Linton Boulevard. These circumstances demonstrate a need for the requested zoning and FLUM change. Future Land Use Element Objective A-1: Property shall be developed or redeveloped, in a manner so that the future use, intensity and density are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; encourage affordable goods and services; are complementary to and compatible with adjacent land uses; and fulfill remaining land use needs. There are no significant environmental characteristics to the subject property. The existing use of the property is vacant land. In the absence of a specific use, it is currently compatible with the adjacent land uses, which consists of commercial to the east, retail to the south, and residential to the north and west. However, the proposed commercial use may have some compatibility concerns with the residentially zoned properties to the west and north. To mitigate these concerns landscaping, berms or privacy walls will be installed per Code requirements. This shall be more specifically addressed upon the official submittal of a development proposal during site plan review. Compliance with LDRs: Development under the requested designation will comply with the provisions and requirements of the Land Development Regulations. Whenever an item is identified elsewhere in these Land Development Regulations (LDRs), it shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on a land development application/request. Such items are found in Section 2.4.5 and in special regulation portions of individual zoning district regulations. At this time, no physical improvements are proposed. If and when improvements are made, a site plan review will be required. No concerns meeting the LDR requirements are anticipated. Compatibility: The requested designation will be compatible with the existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. As demonstrated in the following “Rezoning Analysis” section, the requested GC (General Commercial) zoning and FLUM designation will be compatible with existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. R E Z O N I N G A N A L Y S I S Future Land Use Map Consistency, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Compliance with the development criteria of the LDR were previously discussed under the “Future Land Use Map Amendment Analysis” section of this report. Compliance with the Land Development Regulations with respect to Standards for Rezoning Actions and Rezoning Findings are discussed below. Section 3.2.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions): Standards “A”, “B”, “C”, and “E” are not applicable with respect to this rezoning request. Standard “D” requires that the rezoning shall result in allowing land uses which are deemed compatible with adjacent and nearby land use both existing and proposed; or that if an incompatibility may occur, that sufficient regulations exist to properly mitigate adverse impacts from the new use. LAND USE ANALYSIS: Existing land uses Subject Property -Residential (Zoning District: RM; FLUM: MD) North – Residential (Zoning District: RM; FLUM: MD) South – Retail (Zoning District: PC; FLUM: GC) Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Page 8 East – Commercial (Zoning District: MIC & POD; FLUM: CMR & TRN) West – Residential (Zoning District: R-1-A & CF; FLUM: MD & CF) Proposed land uses Subject Property – Commercial (Zoning District: GC; FLUM: GC) North – Residential (Zoning District: RM; FLUM: MD) South – Retail (Zoning District: PC; FLUM: GC) East – Commercial (Zoning District: MIC & POD; FLUM: CMR & TRN) West – Residential (Zoning District: R-1-A & CF; FLUM: MD & CF) The subject property is bordered on the north and west by residential properties zoned for residential use which are compatible with the existing zoning of this property. However, with the rezoning to commercial use, there will need to be adequate buffering by means of a wall, barrier or landscape buffer to mitigate any potential negative impacts. Nonetheless, with the current use remaining vacant, there are no immediate reasons for concern. Future development of the property for commercial use or mixed-use, if granted, will need to take necessary measures to mitigate any potential negative impact on adjacent residential uses. Across SW 4th Avenue to the east is a compatible commercial use (Security Self Storage). Likewise, the existing medical offices to the east are a compatible commercial use. Across Linton Boulevard to the south are compatible retail and commercial uses (New Century Commons). It is noted that the proposed Future Land Use Designation of GC (General Commercial) is shared with the existing retail shopping center to the south. Based upon the above, this request does not result in an incompatible land use, thus, the proposed development can be found to be in compliance with LDR Section 3.2.2 (D). Section 2.4.5 (D) (5) (Rezoning Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5 (D) (5), Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(D)(5), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the City Commission must make a finding that the rezoning fulfills one of the reasons for which the rezoning change is being sought. These reasons include the following: (a) That the zoning had previously been changed, or was originally established, in error; (b) That there has been a change in circumstances which make the current zoning inappropriate; or (c) That the requested zoning is of similar intensity as allowed under the Future Land Use Map and that it is more appropriate for the property based upon circumstances particular to the site and/or neighborhood. The basis for which the rezoning should be granted, relates to the item (c) above, indicating that the requested zoning of GC is of similar intensity as allowed under the proposed Future Land Use Map Designation of GC which is also being requested. A GC zoning designation is more appropriate for the property given its location along a major east-west commercialized thoroughfare. Because of its location, the parcel would better serve the needs of the general public as a commercial use. Future development of the property as commercial or mixed use will deem it necessary to mitigate potential negative effects on adjacent residential properties. The condominium development to the north is internally positioned on SW 4th Avenue and bordered by walls on Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Page 9 all sides so it will be minimally affected by anticipated commercial development of the subject property. The single family residence to the west is abutted by a fire station to its west which further brings to question its appropriateness as an isolated residential use along Linton Boulevard. Under these circumstances the rezoning to GC is more appropriate. Based upon these positive findings, the proposed development is in compliance with LDR Section 2.4.5(D)(5). R E V I E W B Y O T H E R S The proposed rezoning is not in a geographic area requiring review by either the Historic Preservation Board (HPB), Downtown Development Authority (DDA), or the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). Courtesy Notices: A special courtesy notice was provided to the following homeowners associations: • Neighborhood Advisory Council • Progressive Residents Of Delray (PROD) • Linton Ridge • Southridge • Southridge Village • The Vinings IPARC Notice: On July 9, 2010, notice of the Future Land Use Amendment was provided to the Interlocal Plan Amendment Review Committee (IPARC) which distributes the information to adjacent municipalities. No objections have been received to date. Public Notices: Formal public notice has been provided to property owners within a 500' radius of the subject property. Letters of objection and/or support, if any, will be presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. A S S E S S M E N T A N D C O N C L U S I O N Positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), LDR Section 3.2.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions), LDR Section 2.4.5(D)(5) (Rezoning Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, rezoning of the subject property from RM to GC, and a FLUM amendment from MD to GC, can be recommended for approval, based on the findings outlined herein. D I S C R E T I O N A R Y A C T I O N S A. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for the request for rezoning from RM (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) and a Future Land Use Map amendment from MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/ac) to GC (General Commercial) for the subject property, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and meets the criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D)(5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Development Regulations. B. Move a recommendation of denial to the City Commission for the request for rezoning from RM (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) and a Future Land Use Map amendment from MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/ac) to GC (General Commercial), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and does not meet the criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D)(5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Development Regulations. Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Page 10 C. Move to postpone a recommendation of approval or denial in order to continue reviewing the request for rezoning from RM (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) and a Future Land Use Map amendment from MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/ac) to GC (General Commercial) for the subject property with direction. S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Board move to recommend approval to the City Commission for the request for rezoning from RM (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) and a Future Land Use Map amendment from MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/ac) to GC (General Commercial) for the subject property, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and meets the criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D)(5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Development Regulations. Attachments: Vicinity Map Zoning District Map Future Land Use Map COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #20 Waterford FLUM Amendment Staff Report SD #20 I T E M S B E F O R E T H E B O A R D The action before the Board is making a recommendation to the City Commission on a privatelyinitiated Future Land Use Map amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial, for a 4.58 acre parcel located within Waterford Park, east of I-95 and south of Linton Boulevard, behind Home Depot. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.2(E)(6), the Planning and Zoning Board shall review and make a recommendation to the City Commission with respect to all amendments to the City's Future Land Use Map. B A C K G R O U N D On August 3, 2010, the City Commission initiated several additional items to be included as part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1, which was originally initiated on July 6, 2010. These additional items included this FLUM amendment and an associated text amendment. The City Commission transmittal hearing for Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 is scheduled for Tuesday, August 17, 2010. Adoption of the Amendment is scheduled for October 5, 2010, or for December 7, 2010, if an ORC (Objection, Response and Comments) Report is issued by the State. The 4.58 acre subject property is currently undeveloped. It is described as Parcel “B” on the Plat of Waterford Park, as recorded in Plat Book 91, pages 119-120, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. It has a Transitional (TRN) Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation and a SAD (Special Activities District) zoning designation. The property is bordered to the south and east by the Tierra Verde at Delray Beach residential condominium development; on the north by Home Depot; and to the west by I-95. A hotel is approved on the subject property as a part of the Waterford SAD. The applicant has indicated in his application that a hotel development is not viable because of market conditions, geographical location, and development of the surrounding area. The proposed changes seek to apply a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation which is more consistent with the prevailing commercial development along Linton Boulevard. The ultimate intent of the applicant is to build a retail development on the site. A change from the TRN (Transitional) Future Land Use Map designation to GC (General Commercial) will allow development of the site with a wider range of commercial uses. Please note that a rezoning application for this property–from SAD (Special Activities District) to GC (General Commercial)–had originally been submitted for concurrent processing with the FLUM amendment. During review of the applications, City staff found that the existing zoning was more appropriate, given the parcel’s location as part of the Waterford SAD; and since SAD zoning is already consistent with the General Commercial FLUM designation, a rezoning would not be required. At staff’s suggestion, the rezoning application was withdrawn by the applicant. F U T U R E L A N D U S E M A P A M E N D M E N T A N A L Y S I S Current Future Land Use Map Designation: The current TRN (Transitional) FLUM designation allows mixed-use development with a maximum residential density of 12 du/ac and non-residential uses at a maximum intensity of 1.0 floor-area ratio (FAR). This equates to a maximum development intensity of 55 dwellings units and 199,505 square feet of commercial use for this site. Requested Future Land Use Map Designation: The requested Future Land Use Map Designation is GC (General Commercial). This FLUM designation allows mixed-use development with a maximum residential density of 12 du/ac and nonresidential uses at a maximum intensity of 3.0 floor-area ratio (FAR). However, this Future Land Use Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 2 Map amendment is being processed concurrently with an associated Comprehensive Plan text amendment, which will modify the description of the General Commercial future land use designation to create an overlay district for this property and reduce the maximum non-residential Floor Area Ratio from 3.0 to 1.32. The new maximum floor area ratio does not reflect any specific land development proposal, but is based instead on the maximum development potential that could be accommodated under traffic concurrency standards. With the combination of the FLUM and text amendments, the maximum development intensity of the site will be 55 dwelling units (12 du/ac) and 263,346 sq. ft. of retail use (FAR=1.32). Under this scenario, the maximum non-residential intensity will increase by 32% and the maximum residential intensity will remain the same as under the current TRN designation. REQUIRED FINDINGS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CHAPTER 3 – PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: Pursuant to LDR Section 3.1.1, prior to approval of Land Use applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Future Land Use Map: The resulting use of land or structures must be allowed in the zoning district within which the land is situated and said zoning must be consistent with the applicable land use designation as shown on the Future Land Use Map. Pursuant to Land Development Regulation Section 3.1.1 (A) (Future Land Use Map), the resulting use of land or structures must be allowed in the zoning district within which the land is situated and said zoning must be consistent with the applicable future land use designation as shown on the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use Map Amendment request is to change the existing TRN (Transitional) designation to GC (General Commercial). The General Commercial FLUM designation, as defined in the Comprehensive Plan, is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes (i.e. retail, office, services). Although a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is generally permitted for non-residential uses within this designation, a lower maximum nonresidential Floor Area Ratio for the subject property, will be accomplished through a proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendment, which would establish an overlay district on the property and apply a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 1.32. The proposed change is to accommodate General Commercial uses for future retail development of the undeveloped property. The proposed GC (General Commercial) FLUM designation will allow for the highest and best use of the property. Given its location, a commercial or mixed-use development is appropriate within this highly commercialized corridor (Linton Boulevard) and proximity to I-95. Since the GC (General Commercial) FLUM designation allows more flexibility in the range of commercial uses, development under this designation will be more in line with Linton International Plaza, Delray Crossing Shopping Center and other existing commercial developments along Linton Boulevard. The General Commercial FLUM designation is consistent with the existing SAD (Special Activities District) zoning designation on the property, and therefore, positive findings can be made with respect to this performance standard. It is noted, however, that future approval for development of the property for anything other than the approved hotel will require a modification of the previously Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 3 approved SAD. Modification of an SAD is considered to be a rezoning and must comply with the procedures and required findings of that process. All uses which are to be allowed in a particular SAD must be indicated within a rezoning ordinance approved by the City Commission. Since SAD zoning is meant to deal with unique situations, a complete site and development plan with, at least, preliminary engineering plans must be processed concurrently with the rezoning application, and the approved site plan must be referenced in the rezoning ordinance. Concurrency: Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standards. Concurrency, as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, must be met; and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application, will not exceed the ability of the City and the School District of Palm Beach County to fund and provide, or to require the provision of needed capital improvements to maintain the Levels of Service Standards established in Table CI-GOP-1 of the adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of Delray Beach. The following concurrency analysis assumes development of the entire property within the overlay district at the maximum intensity allowed under the new Future Land Use Map designation at intensities established in the amended description for the General Commercial designation. As shown on the following table, development under this provision would result in an increase of nonresidential development potential from the current 199,505 square feet to 263,346 square feet. The maximum residential density will remain the same at 12 du/ac. The maximum development potential with the proposed amendment would be a mixed-use project with residential development at 12 units per acre and retail development at a maximum FAR of 1.32 as indicated above. A comparative analysis of the maximum development potential of the property has been provided below. Table 1: Maximum Development Potential Waterford Park – Parcel “B” EXISTING PROPOSED FLUM (acres) Maximum Development Potential FLUM (acres) Maximum Mixed Use Development Potential TRN (4.58 acres) Mixed-Use 55 Multi-Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 199,505 SF Retail (FAR 1.0) GC (4.58 acres) Mixed-Use 55 Multi-Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 263,346 SF Retail (FAR 1.32) Traffic: An analysis of the traffic impacts associated with the maximum development potential of a mixeduse development on the property was conducted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. As shown on Table 2 below, the new maximum land use mix will represent a net increase in potential traffic volumes. Table 2 indicates a net new external trip increase of 1,772 ADT (Average Daily Traffic), with 51 AM peak hour trips and 196 PM peak hour trips with the proposed 1.32 FAR (Floor Area Ratio). Kimley-Horn and Associates, indicated in its report that “based on the analyses within this study, the future land use map amendment is expected to continue to allow the significantly impacted roadways to operate acceptably upon build-out of the development site.” Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 5 Water & Sewer: Water treatment is provided by the City of Delray Beach at the Water Treatment Plant. The geographic service area coincides with the Planning Area plus service provided to the Town of Gulf Stream through contract as a bulk customer. The service area encompasses approximately 18 square miles. The treatment plant, with a capacity of 28 million gallons per day, was constructed in 1972 and has a programmed life of 50 years (2022). The water supply is provided from 30 active wells in four wellfields, yielding a total design capacity of 37.2 mgd. The City’s consumptive use permit currently limits the annual withdraw rate to 6.937 billion gallons which equates to an average of 19 mgd (million gallons per day). Water demand projections for the City’s Water Service Area were calculated based on the City’s population projections multiplied by the projected per capita demands. Potable water demand projections, credits for the use of reclaimed water and the total excess/deficit for the years 2010 through 2030 are given in the following table. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum development potential with the FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR (Floor Area Ratio) to 1.32. Potable Water Demand Projections Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Service Area Population 69,335 74,504 81,114 82,233 82,556 Per Capita Use (gpd) 240 240 240 240 240 Avg. Daily Demand (MG) 16.64 17.88 19.47 19.74 19.81 Permit Base Condition (MGD) 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 Excess/(Deficit) (MGD) 2.36 1.12 (0.47) (0.74) (0.81) Alternative sources Reclaimed Water Credits for Ground Water Demand Removal 1.08 1.895 1.895 1.895 1.895 Potable demand removal 0.39 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Excess/Deficit 3.83 3.85 2.27 2.00 1.92 Notes: 1. Population projections based on Palm Beach County 2007 Population Allocation Model using March 2008 BEBR Population Projections. 2. Per capita use assumes a 10% reduction from current permitted values achieved through conservation. 3. Permit base condition as provided by SFWMD per ground water availability rule. Wastewater from the City is treated at the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWWTP), which is managed by the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board, established in 1974 through an agreement between the cities of Delray Beach and Boynton Beach. The SCRWWTP has the capacity to provide up to 24 mgd of reclaimed-quality water. In 2003, the City developed a Reclaimed Water Master Plan, which identified 16 areas for reclaimed water application. The City is currently using reclaimed water to irrigate several golf courses and is installing additional transmission lines to serve other large users. Through the use of reclaimed water, the City’s 20-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan indicates that water supply facilities are planned and will be available to meet the future growth and water demands of the City of Delray Beach through the year 2030. Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 6 The wastewater treatment plant was constructed in 1979, with a programmed life of 50 years (2029). Ultimate disposal was originally by ocean discharge of secondary effluent and land spreading of sludge. In late 2008, deep well injection replaced the ocean discharge except for emergency situations and DEP permitted exceptions. Also in late 2008, with completion of the Palm Beach County Biosolids Pelletization facility, land spreading of sludge is longer being used. The design capacity of the treatment plant, established by its secondary treatment capacity, is 24 mgd. This capacity is shared equally between Boynton Beach and Delray Beach. The current plant has adequate capacity to service the City’s projected population beyond the year 2025. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate wastewater treatment capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum development potential with the FLUM amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 1.32. Since adequate capacity is available in the City’s water and wastewater systems to meet the increased demand, the proposed FLUM amendment will not impact the level of service standard for these facilities. Drainage: The adopted LOS standard for drainage is the SFWMD standard of retention of the first one inch of runoff or 2.5 inches of water storage times the percentage of impervious area. Drainage is reviewed during the site plan application process for individual projects. Within this area of the City, drainage is usually accommodated on site via ex-filtration trench systems or swale retention areas. There are no problems anticipated with obtaining South Florida Water Management District permits within the area and any additional impacts caused by increased impervious area will not affect the level of service standard. Parks & Recreation The Open Space and Recreation Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan indicates in its conclusion that “The City will have sufficient recreation facilities at build-out to meet the adopted standards.” The LOS standard for open space and recreation in the city is 3 acres per 1,000 residents. The amount of land currently provided in activity based recreation facilities, the municipal beaches, and the two public golf courses, establishes a level of service of 6.2 acres per 1,000 residents (2007), far exceeding the general guideline. A park impact fee is collected to offset any impacts that new development may have on the City’s recreational facilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, a park impact fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of a building permit for each residential unit. Since there is no net increase in the residential development potential on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment, this level of service standard is not affected. Education (School Concurrency): Since there is no net increase in the residential development potential (12 units per acre – 55 total allowed under each designation) on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment, this level of service standard is not affected. Solid Waste: As shown on the following table, with the proposed amendment, the development of the property would result in a net increase of 326 tons per year in solid waste generation. In its annual capacity letter, dated January 6, 2010, the Solid Waste Authority indicates that it has sufficient capacity for concurrency management and comprehensive planning purposes. As stated in the letter, “Capacity is available for both the coming year, and the five and ten year planning periods specified in 9J-5- Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 7 005(4).” Based on population projections, waste generation rate projections, waste reduction, and recycling, the Solid Waste Authority forecasts that capacity will be available at the existing landfill through approximately the year 2030. The Board of the Solid Waste Authority has authorized the initial design and permitting efforts to develop a new landfill on 1,600 acres owned by the authority. The capacity of this new landfill would extend the life of the solid waste system beyond the year 2043 or later. Table 3: Solid Waste Generation Waterford Overlay District Existing Maximum Development Potential Proposed Mixed-Use Maximum Development Potential 199,505 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 1,017 tons/year 55 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 28.6 tons/yr 263,346 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 1,343 tons/year 55 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 28.6 tons/yr Based on the above analysis, positive findings can be made at this time with regard to concurrency for all services and facilities. Consistency: The requested designation is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. The following applicable Comprehensive Plan objective and policies are noted: Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7: Amendments to the FLUM must be based upon the findings listed below, and must be supported by data and analysis that demonstrate compliance with these findings: Demonstrated Need --That there is a need for the requested land use. The need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, annexation into the municipal boundaries, or similar circumstances. The need must be supported by data and analysis verifying the changing demographics or other circumstances. This requirement shall not apply to requests for the FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space; nor shall it apply to FLUM changes associated with annexations when the City’s Advisory FLUM designation is being applied, or when the requested designation is of a similar intensity to the Advisory designation. However, the findings described in the remainder of this policy must be addressed with all FLUM amendments. The applicant has provided the following justification statement for the Future Land Use Map amendment being requested: "The subject property has remained vacant for a number of years. It has a Transitional Land Use FLUM and an SAD zoning designation. There was a previous approval several years ago for a hotel on the subject property. Because of various market conditions, the geographical location, and the development of the surrounding area, hotel development is not viable, and a change from the Transitional Land Use designation to General Commercial is more appropriate. The Transitional designation allows for both residential and non-residential uses; however, the non-residential (commercial uses) are limited to those allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial zoning category. Because of the size of the property, 4.58 acres, and its location in the direct proximate location of substantial commercial uses such Linton International Plaza, Ross, Target, and Home Depot among others, a General Commercial FLUM designation will Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 8 enhance the viability of the site. Rather than having several smaller neighborhood "mom & pop" users which tend to come and go based on economic conditions, a General Commercial FLUM designation will make the site available for a more substantial commercial user, which will be more financially stable, less likely to "go dark", and depending on the use, be more destinationoriented and not in need of direct frontage on Linton. Attracting a substantial commercial user will add to the stability of the area and provide a more secure tax payer which will benefit the City. The requested FLUM designation is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and can meet adopted concurrency standards. The General Commercial development of the site is compatible with existing and future land uses and because of the size of the subject property, adequate buffers can be incorporated into the project's development adjacent to the rental apartments in the vicinity." The existing Transitional FLUM designation currently allows for both residential and nonresidential uses; however, the non-residential commercial uses are generally limited to those allowed in the NC (Neighborhood Commercial), POC (Planned Office Center) and POD (Professional and Office) zoning districts. It is noted, however, that SADs have been approved which include uses not allowed within the applicable conventional zoning designations. For example, although a hotel is currently approved on the subject property within the Waterford SAD, this use is not permitted within the conventional zoning districts allowed within the Transitional FLUM designation. The applicant states that a hotel development is not viable because of market conditions, geographical location, and development of the surrounding area. The proposed changes seek to apply a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation which is more consistent with the prevailing commercial development along Linton Boulevard. The applicant states that these changes will make the site available for a substantial retail development with a commercially stable user, which will be more financially stable, less likely to "go dark", and depending on the use, be more destination-oriented and not in need of direct frontage on Linton Boulevard. The General Commercial FLUM designation allows for the wider range of uses permitted within the GC (General Commercial) zoning district. The proposed FLUM designation is more consistent with the existing commercial character of the Linton Boulevard corridor. The applicant states that because of the size of the property and its location in direct proximity to substantial commercial uses, such as Linton International Plaza, Delray Crossing Shopping Center, Ross, Target, and Home Depot among others, a General Commercial FLUM designation will enhance the viability of the site. This may be true since there will be a wider range of development options available within the proposed FLUM designation. However, it must be noted that future approval for development of the property for anything other than the approved hotel will require a modification of the previously approved SAD and processed as a rezoning application. As indicated above, these circumstances demonstrate a need for the requested FLUM change. Future Land Use Element Objective A-1: Property shall be developed or redeveloped, in a manner so that the future use, intensity and density are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; encourage affordable goods and services; are complementary to and compatible with adjacent land uses; and fulfill remaining land use needs. There are no significant environmental characteristics to the subject property. The existing use of the property is undeveloped land. In the absence of a specific use, it is currently compatible with the adjacent land uses, which include the Tierra Verde at Delray Beach residential condominium development to the south and east and Home Depot to the north. The property is bordered on the Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 9 west by a lake and I-95. Since the property is approved for a hotel development within the SAD zoning, non-residential development of the property has already been anticipated. Hotel development remains consistent with the proposed General Commercial FLUM designation, and the approved hotel could still be constructed on the property following this amendment. However, it will also be possible for the SAD to be modified to accommodate most types of commercial, office and mixed-use development. Future commercial development of the property will be compatible with the commercial development to the north, and there will be no impact on the open space/I-95 corridor to the west. During the Site Plan Review process, vehicular and pedestrian access, building heights and setbacks, parking lot lighting, landscaping and buffering elements, such as landscaping, berms or privacy walls, will all be evaluated to mitigate impacts on the adjacent residential development to the south and east. Compliance with LDRs: Development under the requested designation will comply with the provisions and requirements of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5 and Article 4.6 Supplemental District Regulations, whenever an item is identified elsewhere in the Land Development Regulations, it shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on a land development application/request. At this time, no physical improvements have been proposed on the subject property. When improvements are proposed in the future, a site plan review and approval will be required. Staff does not anticipate any concerns regarding compliance with Land Development Regulations. As noted above, additional buffering will be required where the property abuts residential uses. Compatibility: The requested designation will be compatible with the existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. The requested General FLUM designation will allow for future commercial development of the undeveloped property. Future commercial development will be compatible with the existing commercial development to the north (Home Depot), and there will be no impact on the open space/I-95 corridor to the west. During the Site Plan Review process, vehicular and pedestrian access, building heights and setbacks, parking lot lighting, landscaping and buffering elements, such as landscaping, berms or privacy walls, will all be evaluated to mitigate impacts on the adjacent residential development to the south and east. Based on the above, the requested GC (General Commercial) FLUM designation will be compatible with existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. R E V I E W B Y O T H E R S The proposed rezoning is not in a geographic area requiring review by either the Historic Preservation Board (HPB), Downtown Development Authority (DDA), or the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). Courtesy Notices: A special courtesy notice was provided to the following homeowners associations: • Neighborhood Advisory Council • Progressive Residents Of Delray (PROD) • Waterford Apartments • Tierra Verde at Delray Beach • Southridge • Southridge Village • Linton Ridge Public Notices: Formal public notice has been provided to property owners within a 500' radius of the subject property. Please note that a letter of objection has been attached to this report. Additional letters of objection and/or support, if any, will be presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 10 A S S E S S M E N T A N D C O N C L U S I O N Positive findings can be made with respect to Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), LDR Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the proposed FLUM Amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial) should be approved based on the findings described in this staff report. Thus, a recommendation for approval to the City commission can be made. D I S C R E T I O N A R Y A C T I O N S A. Continue with direction. B. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission of a request for Future Land Use Map Amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial, for the Waterford Park Parcel “B”, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), LDR Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. C. Move a recommendation of denial to the City Commission of a request for Future Land Use Map Amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial, for the Waterford Park Parcel “B”, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is not consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), LDR Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission of a request for Future Land Use Map Amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial, for the Waterford Park Parcel “B”, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), LDR Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Attachments: Location Map Zoning District Map Future Land Use Map Letter of Objection PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: JULY 19, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: IV.A. RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION REGARDING TRANSMITTAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2010-1. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is that of recommending to the City Commission transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS The City Commission initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 on July 6, 2010. This amendment represents the first amendment for the year 2010 and included two (2) city-initiated Future Land Use Map Amendments, nineteen (19) city-initiated text amendments, one (1) privately-initiated Future Land Use Map Amendment and one (1) privately-initiated text amendment. It is noted that two (2) of the city-initiated text amendments have been deleted. A brief description of each item suggested for inclusion in the Plan Amendment is listed below: TEXT AMENDMENTS: • City-initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the City’s Five-Year Capital Improvements Schedule (Table CI-CIP) to reflect adoption of the FY2010-FY2014 Capital Improvements Program. • City-initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the City’s Reclaimed Water Capital Improvement Schedule (Table RW-CIP) to reflect adoption of the FY2010-FY2014 Capital Improvements Program. • City-initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the Palm Beach County School District’s Capital Improvement Schedule (Table SD-CIP) to reflect adoption of its FY2010-FY2014 Capital Improvements Program. • City-initiated: Conservation Element -Modification of Policy E-1.1, dealing with the Green Task Force, to reflect new name (Green Implementation Advancement Board) and new Board purpose. • City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-1.4 to extend the time frame for completion of a study on economic development issues from FY08/09 to FY11/12. • City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-1.10 to extend the time frame for evaluating the need for establishing design guidelines for the Congress Avenue Corridor and the Four Corners Overlay District from FY08/09 to FY10/11. • City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-1.11 to extend the time to develop of a marketing plan to attract new business and promote redevelopment of the Congress Avenue corridor from FY08/09 to FY10/11. P&Z Board Staff Report -July 19, 2010 IV.A. Transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 Page 2 • City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy A-2.5 to extend the time frame for analysis of the Land Development Regulations, dealing with nonconforming uses, from FY08/09 to FY11/12. • City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy C-1.4 to extend the time frame for evaluating the need for establishing design guidelines for the North Federal Highway corridor from FY08/09 to FY10/11. • City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy C-1.12 to extend the time frame for completion of a Redevelopment Plan for the South Federal Highway from FY08/09 to FY10/11. • City-initiated: Future Land Use Element -Modification of Policy C-1.13 to extend the time frame for completion of a Redevelopment Plan for Linton Boulevard, from I-95 to Federal Highway, from FY08/09 to FY10/11. • Privately-initiated: Future Land Use Element – Modification of the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify specific uses and intensities (FARs) for development within a proposed overlay district for the Lintco property on the north side of Linton Boulevard, west of SW 4th Avenue. • City-initiated: Housing Element -Deletion of Policy B-3.3 (Completed). • City-initiated: Transportation Element -Modification of Policy A-1.8 to extend the time frame for investigation of the feasibility of implementing an impact fee or other system for assessment of new development to fund operation of the downtown roundabout shuttle service from FY08/09 to FY10/11. • City-initiated: Transportation Element -Modification of Objective A-8 to extend the time frame for development of a program to encourage street trees for green linkages from FY08/09 to FY10/11. • City-initiated: Transportation Element -Modification of Policy D-2.4 to extend the time frame for adoption of a bicycle network plan for the city from FY09/10 to FY11/12. • City-initiated: Transportation Element -Modification of Policy D-3.1 to extend the time frame for completion of surveys and analysis to determine the issues and needs for employer based TDM activities, including but not limited to ride sharing, van pooling, and flexible work hours, from FY09/10 to FY10/11. • City-initiated: Transportation Element -Modification of Policy D-3.5 to extend the time frame to determine the operational feasibility and grant funding requirements necessary to provide shuttle service to meet and greet all trains at the station from FY08/09 to FY10/11. FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS: • City-initiated Future Land Use Map amendment to assign a City Future Land Use Map designation concurrently with the annexation of “The Marketplace of Delray”, containing approximately 30.26 acres of property located at the northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail. The current County Land Use Map designation is CH/8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential of 8 units per acre) and the proposed City designation is GC (General Commercial). P&Z Board Staff Report -July 19, 2010 IV.A. Transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 Page 3 • City-initiated Future Land Use Map amendment to assign a City Future Land Use Map designation concurrently with the annexation of Lots 5 -7 of the “Breezy Acres” subdivision, containing approximately 2.5 acres of property located on the east side of Markland Lane, 491 feet south of West Atlantic Avenue. The current County Land Use Map designation is MR-5 (Medium Density Residential, 5 units per acre) and the proposed City designation is LD (Residential Low Density 0-5 du/ac). • Privately-initiated Future Land Use Map amendment for the approximate 7.08 acre Lintco property located on the north side of Linton Boulevard, west of SW 4th Avenue, from MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/acre) to GC (General Commercial). REVIEW BY OTHERS Courtesy Notices: Courtesy notices were provided to the following homeowner and civic associations: Neighborhood Advisory Council Letters of objection and support, if any, will be provided at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION By motion, recommend that the City Commission transmit proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Attachments: • Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: AUGUST 16, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: IV.A. RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION REGARDING TRANSMITTAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2010-1. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is that of recommending to the City Commission transmittal of additional items as part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS By Florida State Statutes, the City is allowed to process two Comprehensive Plan amendments each year. The 2010-1 amendment, initiated by the City Commission on July 6, 2010, included two (2) city-initiated Future Land Use Map Amendments, nineteen (19) city-initiated text amendments, one (1) privately-initiated Future Land Use Map Amendment and one (1) privately-initiated text amendment. It is noted that two (2) of the city-initiated text amendments were subsequently deleted. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the Amendment on July 19, 2010 and recommended transmittal, with the exception of the Breezy Acres FLUM amendment, which was tabled until its meeting of August 16, 2010. On August 3, 2010, the City Commission initiated several additional items to be included as part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1. The additional items included three (3) cityinitiated text amendments, one (1) privately-initiated text amendment and one (1) privatelyinitiated Future Land Use Map Amendment. The additional items, together with the tabled Breezy Acres FLUM Amendment, are now before the Planning and Zoning Board for recommendation. A brief description of each item is listed below: TEXT AMENDMENTS • City-initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the General Fund Revenue and Expenditure 5-Year Forecast Table. • City initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the Pledgeable Revenue Matrix Table. • City-initiated: Capital Improvement Element -Update the Debt Summary Table. • Privately-initiated: Future Land Use Element – Modification of the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify specific uses and intensities (FARs) for development within a proposed overlay district for Waterford located east of I-95, south of Linton Boulevard. FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS: • City-initiated Future Land Use Map amendment to assign a City Future Land Use Map designation concurrently with the annexation of Lots 5 -7 of the “Breezy Acres” subdivision, containing approximately 2.5 acres of property located on the east side of Markland Lane, P&Z Board Staff Report -August 16, 2010 IV.A. Transmittal of Additional items with Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 Page 2 491 feet south of West Atlantic Avenue. The current County Land Use Map designation is MR-5 (Medium Density Residential, 5 units per acre) and the proposed City designation is LD (Residential Low Density 0-5 du/ac). • Privately-initiated Future Land Use Map amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial) for a 4.58 acre parcel located within Waterford, east of I-95, south of Linton Boulevard. REVIEW BY OTHERS Courtesy Notices: Courtesy notices were provided to the following homeowner and civic associations: Neighborhood Advisory Council The City has received letters of objection to the Breezy Acres Annexation/FLUM Amendment, which are attached with the staff report for that item. Additional letters of objection and support, if any, will be provided at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION By motion, recommend that the City Commission add the items contained in this staff report to Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 and transmit the Amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Attachments: • Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010-1 with applicable support documents. ( 2 ) 4) Location: Capital Improvement Element - Pgs. CI -12, General Fund Reve nue and Expenditure 5 -Year Forecast Table See existing table attached as Support Document #7. Change: REVISION Comment: The table is being modified to update the timeframe s . See revised table attached as Support Document #8. 5) Location: Capital Imp rovement Element - Pgs. CI -13, Pledgeable Revenue Matrix Table See existing table attached as Support Document #9. Change: REVISION Comment: The table is being modified to update the timeframe s . See revised table attached as Support Document #10 . 6) Location: Capital Improvement Element - Pg. CI -14 to CI -15 , Debt Summary Table See existing table attached as Support Document #11 . Change: REVISION Comment: The table is being modified to update the timeframe s . See revised table attached as Support Document #12 . 7) Location: Conservation Element - Pg. CO -17 , Objective E -1 and Policy E -1.1 (Sustainability) Objective E -1 In 2008, determine an actionable set of recommendations that enables the City of Delray Beach to implement its current environmental commitments in a timely, cost - effective, and citizen -centric manner, as well as explore new opportunitie s for sustainability. Policy E -1.1 In 2008 , a Green Task Force shall be created to address the following issues and provide a report to the City Com mission: 1. Ways to improve the environmental Sustainability of City programs, services, and equipment facilities. 2. Strategies for improving environmental sustainabili ty of the community ( 3 ) 3. Incentives for residents, businesses, and organizat ions to practice environmental conservation including recycling 4. Proposed means to enhance water and energy conserva tion. 5. Ideas for promotion of tree planting and xeriscapin g. 6. Best Practices for implementation in Delray Beach, including long -term strateg ies. Change: REVISION Objective E -1 In 2008 Annually , determine an actionable set of recommendations th at enables the City of Delray Beach to implement its current envir onmental commitments in a timely, cost-effective, and citizen -centric manner, as well as explore new opportunitie s for sustainability. The City of Delray Beach encourages land use planni ng and development based on sustainability principles and practices. T he City also, when applicable, recommends implementation of policies and programs th at provide environmental, economic and social benefits to residents, business es, visitors and other governmental agencies to strengthen Delray Beach’s position as a model of sustainable practices. Policy E -1.1 In 2008 , a Green Task Force shall be created to address the following issues and provide a report to the City Commission. By February 1 st of each year, th e Green Implementation Advancement Board (GIAB), shall review City operations and policies toward achieving Delray Beach’s green and sustainability goals and providing a report of recommendation to the City Commission regarding : 1. Ways to improve the environmental Sustainability of City programs, services, and equipment facilities. 2. Strategies for improving environmental sustainabili ty of the c ommunity 3. Incentives for residents, businesses, and organizat ions to practice environmental conservation including recycling . 4. Proposed means to enhance water and energy conserva tion. 5. Ideas for promotion of tree planting and xeriscapin g. 6. Best Practices for implementation in Delray Beach, inclu ding long -term strategies. 7. Proposed revisions to City Ordinances to address Gr een Technologies. The GIAB will consider the cost and environmental implications re lated to any potential recommendation t o the City . The GIAB’s consideration will include the “Double B ottom Line” approach, which includes: x Financial – Total cost, funding availability and is the payback within a reasonable timeframe (5 -8 years) x Environmental - Is the recommendation good for the environment with in the City of Delray Beach and does it improve the City’s overall quality of life. Comment: This Objective and Policy are being revised to reflect the new name for the Green Task Force, (Green Implementation Advancement Board) and exp anded Board purpose. ( 4 ) 8) Location: Future Land Use Element - Pg. FL -18 , Policy A -1.4 (Economic Development Study) Policy A -1.4 The City shall undertake a comprehensive study of e conomic development issues and needs in FY 08/09 . The study will, at a minim um, assess the major economic components of the City to determine the us es necessary to accommodate employment needs and sustain economic growth. Recom mendations made in the study regarding land use needs shall be adopted as polici es in the Future Land Use Element. Change: REVISION Policy A -1.4 The City shall undertake a comprehensive study of e conomic development issues and needs in FY 08/09 2011 -12 . The study will, at a minimum, assess the major economic components of the City to determine the us es necessary to accommodate employment needs and sustain economic growth. Recom mendations made in the study regarding land use needs shall be adopted as polici es in the Future Land Use Element. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time f rame for completion of the task . 9) Location: Future Land Use Element - Pg. FL -20 , Policy A -1.10 (Design Guidelines) Policy A -1.10 In FY 2008/09, the Planning & Zoning department sha ll evaluate the need for establishing design guidelines for the Congress Avenue Corridor and the Four Corners Overlay District. Change: REVISION Policy A -1.10 In FY 2008/09 2 010/11 , the Planning & Zoning department shall evaluate the need for establishing design guideline s for the Congress Avenue Corridor and the Four Co rners Overlay District. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task . 10 ) Location: Future Land Use Element - Pg. FL -20 , Policy A -1.11 (Congress Avenue Corridor) Policy A -1.11 In FY 2008/09, the City shall work with the Chamber of Commerce to develop a marketing plan to attract new business and promote redevelopment of the Congress Avenue Corridor. Change: REVISION ( 5 ) Policy A -1.11 In FY 2008/09 2010/11 , the City shall work with the Chamber of Comme rce to develop a marketing plan to attract new busi ness and promote redevelopment of the Congress Avenue Corridor. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task . 11 ) Location: Future Land Use Element - Pg. FL -21 , Policy A -2.5 (Nonconforming Uses) Policy A -2.5 The section of the Land Development Regulations tha t deals with nonconforming uses and structures shall be comprehe nsively evaluated in order to ensure that the restrictions on the continuation, e xpansion, and improvement of nonconforming structures and uses are clear and enf orceable. This evaluation and the subsequent LDR changes shall be completed in FY 08/09. Change: REVISION Policy A -2.5 The section of the Land Development Regulations tha t deals with nonconforming uses and structures shall be comprehe nsively evaluated in order to ensure that the restrictions on the continuation, e xpansion, and improvement of nonconforming structures and uses are clear and enf orceable. This evaluation and t he subsequent LDR changes shall be completed in F Y 08/09 2011/12 . Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task . 12 ) Location: Future Land Use Element - Pg. FL -28 , Policy C -1.4 (Design Guidelines) P olicy C -1.4 The following pertains to the North Federal Highway Corridor: The North Federal Highway Corridor is defined as th e area bounded by the FEC railroad right -of -way to the west, the easterly boundary of the CRA t o the east, NE 4 th Street to the south, and the north City limits to t he north. Properties in the corridor that front on Federal Hi ghway primarily contain small -scale, strip commercial development. Many parcels in the area contain vacant or dilapidated structures, substandard parking, and substandard la ndscaping. The area also contains residential areas identified as “Stabilization” and “Revitalization” on the Residential Neighborhood Categorization Map contained in the Ho using Element. Many of the remaining parcels in the area are curre ntly vacant. Due to those conditions, the North Federal Highway Corridor is hereby identified as a blighted area. The North Federal Highway Redevelop ment Plan was approved by City Commission on March 16, 1999. The Plan identified t he need for limited rezonings and LDR amendments, along with improvements necessary t o accomplish certain ( 6 ) redevelopment goals. Future development in the area must be in accordance with the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. In FY 2008/09, the Planning & Zoning department sha ll evaluate the need for establishing design guidelines for the corridor. Change: REVISION Policy C -1.4 The following pertains to the North Federal Highway Corridor: The North Federal Highway Corridor is defined as th e area bounded by the FEC railr oad right -of -way to the west, the easterly boundary of the CRA t o the east, NE 4 th Street to the south, and the north City limits to t he north. Properties in the corridor that front on Federal Hi ghway primarily contain small -scale, strip commercial development. Many parcels in the area contain vacant or dilapidated structures, substandard parking, and substandard la ndscaping. The area also contains residential areas identified as “Stabilization” and “Revitalization” on the Residential Neighborhood Categorization Map contained in the Ho using Element. Many of the remaining parcels in the area are currently vacant. Due to those conditions, the North Federal Highway Corridor is hereby identified as a blighted area. The North Federal Highway Redevelop ment Plan was approved by City Commission on March 16, 1999. The Plan identified t he need for limited rezonings and LDR amendments, along with improvements necessary t o accomplish certain redevelopment goals. Future development in the area must be in accordanc e with the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. In FY 2008/09 2010/11 , the Planning & Zoning department shall evaluate t he need for establishing design guidelines for the corridor. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time fram e for completion of the task . 13) Location: Future Land Use Element - Pg. FL -31 , Policy C -1.12 (Redevelopment Plan ) Policy C -1.12 The following pertains to the South Federal Highway area, south of Linton Boulevard. In FY 2008/09, the City’s Planning & Zoning Department shall review existing land uses in this area and shall create a redevelopment plan, overlay district or other development tool to promote and guide future redevelopment of t he area. Change: REVISION ( 7 ) Policy C -1.12 The following pertain s to the South Federal Highway area, south of Linton Boulevard. In FY 2008/09 2010/11 , the City’s Planning & Zoning Department shall rev iew existing land uses in this area and shall create a redevelop ment plan, overlay district or other development tool t o promote and guide future redevelopment of the are a. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task . 14) Location: Future Land Use Element - Pg. FL -31 , Policy C -1.13 (Redevelopment Plan) Policy C -1.1 3 The following pertains to the Linton Boulevard area , from I -95 east to Federal Highway. In FY 2008/09, the City’s Planning & Zoning Departm ent shall review existing land uses in this area and shall create a redevelopment plan, overlay district or other development tool to promote and guide future redevelopment of t he area. Change: REVISION Policy C -1.13 The following pertains to the Linton Boulevard area , from I -95 east to Federal Highway. In FY 2008/09 2010/11 , the City’s Planning & Zoning Department shall review existing land uses in this area and shall create a redevelop ment plan, overlay district or other development tool to promote and guide future redeve lopment of the area. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame f or completion of the task . 15) Location: Housing Element - Pg. HO -38 , Policy B -3.3 (Group Homes and Foster Care) Policy B -3.3 The City shall review its Land Development Regulati ons for consistency with Chapter 419, FS, regarding the location of gro up homes and foster care facilities. This review will be completed in FY 08/09. Change: DELETION Comment: This Policy is being eliminated since it has been c ompleted . ( 8 ) 16) Location: Transportation Element - Pg. TR -37 , Policy A -1.8 (Downtown Roundabout) P olicy A -1.8 In FY 2008/09, the city shall investigate the feasi bility of implementing an impact fee or other system for assessment of new de velopment to fund operation of the downtown roundabout shuttle service . Change: REVISION Policy A -1.8 In FY 2008/0 9 2010/11 , the city shall investigate the feasibility of implementing an impact fee or other system for asse ssment of new development to fund operation of the downtown roundabout shuttle s ervice . Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task . 17) Location: Transportation Element - Pg. TR -40 , Objective A -8 (Green Linkages) Objective A -8 In FY 2008/09, a program shall be developed to supp ort the City character by encouraging street trees for green link ages. Change: REVISION Objective A -8 In FY 2008/09 2010/11 , a program shall be developed to support the City character by encouraging street trees for green linkages. Comment: This Objective is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for complet ion of the task . 18) Location: Transportation Element - Pg. TR -43 , Policy D -2.4 (Bicycle Network) Policy D -2.4 By FY 2009/10, the City shall prepare and adopt a b icycle network plan for the city. Change: REVISION Policy D -2.4 By FY 2009/10 2011/12 , t he City shall prepare and adopt a bicycle network plan for the city. Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task . ( 9 ) 19) Location: Transportation Element - Pg. TR -44 , Policy D -3.1 (TDM) Policy D -3.1 I n cooperation with the Florida Department of Transp ortation regional Commuter Assistance Program, the City shall perform and analyze transportation surveys to determine the issues and needs for emplo yer based TDM activities, including but not limited to ride sharing, van pooling, and f lexible work hours. These activities shall be completed in FY 09/10 . Change: REVISION Policy D -3.1 In cooperation with the Florida Department of Trans portation regional Commuter Assistance Program, the City shall perform an d analyze transportation surveys to determine the issues and needs for emplo yer based TDM activities, including but not limited to ride sharing, van pooling, and f lexible work hours. These activities shall be completed in FY 09/10 2010/11 . Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for completion of the task . 20 ) Location: Transportation Element - Pg. TR -44 , Policy D -3.5 (Shuttle) Policy D -3.5 The City and the CRA shall continue to monitor the feasibility of the existing in -town shuttle system providing service between Tri -Rail and the beach with headways of 20 -30 minutes. In FY 2008/09, the City shall determine the operational feasibility and grant funding requirements necessar y to provide shuttle service to meet and greet all trains at the station. Change: REVISION Policy D -3.5 The City and the CRA shall continue to monitor the feasibility of the existing in -town shuttle system providing service between Tri -Rail and the beach with headways of 20 -30 minutes. In FY 2008/09 2010/11 , the City shall determine the operational feasibility and grant funding requireme nts necessary to provide shuttle service to meet and greet all trains at the station . Comment: This Policy is being revised to reflect an updated time frame for compl etion of the task . ( 10 ) PRIVATELY -INITIATED TEXT CHANG ES: 21 ) Location: Future Land Use Element. Pg. FL -39, D escription of the General Commercial FLUM designation . General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or sh ould be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office , services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are perm issible under this designation when located in the special overlay district betwee n Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, nort h of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. A m aximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses, except for mixed -use development within the Four Corners Overlay District, where the nonresiden tial component is limited to an FAR of 2.0, and except within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where the nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.75. Residential uses may comprise up to 15% of the total floor area of the General Co mmercial Land Use designation. Residenti al uses are permitted either in conjunction with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use subject to Conditional Use approval . Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre, except in Re development Area #6 (Lindell/Federal Highway) where residential densiti es may be allowed up to a maximum of 16 units per acre subject to Conditional Use app roval and the criteria outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for that area and within the Sil ver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where residential densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 22 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. Areas wit h the General Commercial designation, located within a workforce housing ove rlay district, may also exceed 12 units per acre up to a maximum of 30 units per acre within the Four Corners Overla y District and 18 units per acre within the infill wo rkforce housing area, by obtaining density bonuses through the provision of workforce housing units. Change: REVISION General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or sh ould be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. reta il, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are perm issible under this designation when located in the special overlay district betwee n Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north Cit y limit. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses, except as indicated within the following overlay districts: for mixed -use deve lopment within the Four Corners Overlay District, where the nonresidential component is limited to an FAR of 2.0, and except within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where th e nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.75. x Four Cor ners Overlay District - For mixed -use development within this overlay district, the nonresidential component is limited t o an FAR of 2.0 x Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District - Nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.75 x Lintco Development Overlay District - Nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.36. ( 11 ) Residential uses may comprise up to 15% of the tota l floor area of the General Commercial Land Use designation. Residential uses a re permitted either in conjunction with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use subj ect to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 d welling units per acre, except in Redevelopment Area #6 (Lindell/Federal Highway) whe re residential densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 16 units per acre subjec t to Conditional Use approval and the criteria outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for that area and within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where residenti al densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 22 un its per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. A reas with the General Commercial designation, located within a wo rkforce housing overlay district, may also exceed 12 units per acre up to a maximum o f 30 units per acre within the Four Corners Overlay District and 18 units per acre with in the infill workforce housing area, by obtaining density bonuses through the provision of workforce housing units. Comment: The 7.08 acres within the proposed Lintco Development overlay district has a current Future Land Use designation of MD (Residential Medium Density 5 -12 du/acre). A Future Land Use Map amendment (See Support Docu ment #1 9 ) i s being processed concurrently to change the FLUM designation to GC (General Commercial). The overlay district is being created to allow mixed -use development on the property at a nonresidential intensity lower than that currentl y allowed within the GC designation . The maximum intensity for nonresidential uses withi n the overlay district will be set at a n FAR of 0.36 . The maximum den sity for residential development will remain unchanged at 12 du.ac. Existing and proposed colored Future Land Use Maps , which also include the overlay district, are attached as Support Document #13 The concurrency analysis assumes development of the entir e property within the overlay district at the maximum intensity allowed u nder the amended description for the General Commercial designation. As shown on the fol lowing table, development under th is provision would result in the addition of nonresidential d evelopment potential where none now exists. The maximum development potential with the proposed amendment would be a mixed -use project with residential development at 12 units per acre and retail development at a maximum FAR of 0.36 . A comparative analysis of the maximum development potential of the property has been prov ided below. Table 1: Maximum Development Potential Lintco Development Overlay District EXISTING PROPOSED FLUM (acres) Maximum Development Potential FLUM (acres) Maximum Mixed Use Devel opment Potential MD (7.08 acres) 85 Multi -Family Residential Units (1 2 units per acre) GC (7.08 acres) Mixed -Use 85 Multi -Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 111,026 SF Retail (FAR 0.36 ) ( 12 ) Traffic: An analysis of the traffic impacts associa ted with the maximum development potential of a mixed -use development on the property was conducted by Kimley -Horn and Associates , Inc . The entire Kimley -Horn Traffic Impact Analysis is attached as Support Document #14 . As shown on the following table from the report , the new maximum land use mix will represent a net increase in potential traffic volumes. Analyses were conducted for each of the three planning horizons –existing (2009), short -term (2015) and long -term (2035 ). In the C onclusion S ection on page 17 of the Report , the consultant indicates that “based on the analyses within this study, the futur e land use map amendment is expected to continue to allow the significantly impacted roadways to operate acceptably upon build -out of the development site.” Table 2: Trip Generation Comparison - Maximum Intensity Lintco Development Overlay District ( 13 ) Water & Sewer: Water treatment is provided by the City of Delray B each at the Water Treatment Plant. The geographic service area coincides with the Plan ning Area plus service provided to the Town of Gulf Stream through contract as a bulk customer. The service area encompasses approximately 18 square miles. The trea tment plant, with a capacity of 28 million gallons per day, was constructed in 1972 an d has a programmed life of 50 years (2022). The water supply is provided from 30 active wells i n four wellfields, yielding a total design capacity of 37.2 mgd. The City’s consu mptive use permit currently limits the annual withdraw rate to 6.937 billion gallons which equates to an averag e of 19 mgd. Water demand projections for the City’s Water Servi ce Area were calculated based on the City’s population projections multiplied by the projected per capita demands. Potable water demand projections, credits for the u se of reclaimed water and the total excess/deficit for the years 2010 through 2030 are given in the following table. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adeq uate capacity exist s to service the subject property at its maximum development potenti al with the FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36. Potable Water Demand Projections Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Service Area Population 69,335 74,504 81,114 82,233 82,556 Per Capita Use (gp d) 240 240 240 240 240 Avg. Daily Demand (MG) 16.64 17.88 19.47 19.74 19.81 Permit Base Condition (MGD) 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 Excess/(Deficit) (MGD) 2.36 1.12 (0.47) (0.74) (0.81) Alternative sources Reclaimed Water Credits for Ground Water Demand Removal 1.08 1.895 1.895 1.895 1.895 Potable demand removal 0.39 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Excess/Deficit 3.83 3.85 2.27 2.00 1.92 Notes: 1. Population projections based on Palm Beach County 2 007 Population Allocation Model using March 2008 BE BR Population Projections. 2. Per capita use assumes a 10% reduction from current permitted values achieved through conservation. 3. Permit base condition as provided by SFWMD per grou nd water availability rule. Wastewater fr om the City is treated at the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWWTP), which is managed by the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board, establishe d in 1974 through an agreement between the cities of Delray Beach an d Boynton Beach. The SCRWWTP has the capacity to provide up to 24 mgd of reclaimed -quality water. In 2003, the City developed a Reclaimed Water Master Plan, which identified 16 areas for reclaimed water application. The City is currently using reclaimed water to irrigate several golf courses and is installing additional transmission lines to serve other large users. Through the use of reclaimed water, the City’s 20 -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan indicates ( 14 ) that water supply facilities are planned and will be available to meet the future growth and water demands of the City of Delray Beach throu gh the year 2030. The wastewater treatment plant was constructed in 1 979, with a programmed life of 50 years (2029). Ultimate disposal was originally by ocean discharge of secondary effluent and land spreading of sludge. In late 2008, deep we ll injection r eplace d the ocean discharge except for emergency situations and DEP p ermitted exceptions. Also in late 2008, with completion of the Palm Beach County Bios olid s Pelletization facility, land spreading of sludge is longer be ing used. The design capacity of the treatment plant, established by its secondary treatment capacity, is 24 mgd. This capacity is shared equally between Boynton Beach and Delray Beach. The current plant has adequate capacity to service the City’s project ed population beyond the year 2025. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate wa stewater treatment capacity exist s to service the subject property at its maximum development po tential with the FLUM amendment and associated text amendment , which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36 . Since adequate capacity is available in the City’s water and wastewater systems to meet the increased demand, the proposed FLUM amendm ent will not impact the level of service standard for these facilities. Drainage: The adopted LOS standards for drainage is the SFWMD standard of retention of the first one inch of runoff or 2.5 inches of water sto rage times the percentage of impervious area. Local and City -wide drainage deficiencies are identified in the St ormwater Master Plan (Kimley -Horn, 2000). The City has programmed projects to co rrect the deficiencies identified in this report and achieve the Level of Service standard. Public Facilities Element Objective E -1 states: A capital improvement program directed specifically to storm drainage and runoff management has been adopted by the City Commission, and capital projects, as identified in that program, shall be implemented wi th funding to come from the Stormwater Utility Fee. Drainage is reviewed during the site plan applicati on process for individual projects. Within this area of the City, drainage is usually a ccommodated on site via exfiltration trench systems or swale retention areas. There are no problems anticipated with obtaining South Florida Water Management District p ermits within the area and any additional impacts caused by increased impervious a rea will not affect the level of service standard. Parks & Recreation The Open Space and Recreation Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan indicates in its conclusion that “The City will have sufficient recreation facilitie s at build -out to meet the adopted standards.” The LOS standard for open space and recreation in the city is 3 acres per 1,000 residents. The amount of land cur rently provided in activity based recreation facilities, the municipal beaches, and t he two public golf courses, establishes ( 15 ) a level of service of 6.2 acres per 1,000 residents (2007), far exceeding the general guideline. A park impact fee is collected to offset any impact s that new development may have on the City’s recreational facilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, a park impact fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior t o issuance of a building permit for each residential unit. Since there is no net increase in the residential development potential on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36 , this level of service standard is not affected. Education (School Concurrency): Since there is no net increase in the residential d evelopment potential on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36, this level of service standard is not affected. Solid Waste: As shown on the following table, with the proposed amendment, the development of the property would result in a net increase of 566 tons per year in solid waste generation. In i ts annual capacity letter, dated January 6, 2010, t he Solid Waste Authority indicates that it has sufficient capacity for concurrency man agement and comprehensive planning purposes. As stated in the letter, “Capacity is ava ilable for both the coming year, and the five and ten year planning periods specified in 9J -5-005(4).” Based on population projections, waste generation rate projections, waste reduction, and recycling, the Solid Waste Authority forecasts that capacity will be ava ilable at the existing la ndfill through approximately the year 2030 . The Board of the Solid Waste Authority has author ized the initial design and permitting efforts to develop a new landfill on 1,600 acres owned by the authority. The capacity of this new landfill wo uld extend the life of the solid waste system beyond the year 2043 or later . Table 3: Solid Waste Generation Lintco D e velopment Overlay District Existing Maximum Development Potential Proposed Mixed -Use Maximum Development Potential 85 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 44.2 t ons/yr 111,026 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 566 tons/year 85 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 44.2 tons/yr 22 ) Location: Future Land Use Element. Pg. FL -39, D escription of the General Commercial FLUM designation . General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or sh ould be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. reta il, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are perm issible under this designation when located in the special overlay district betwee n Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north Cit y limit. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses, except for mixed -use development within the ( 16 ) Four Corners Overlay District, where the nonresiden tial component is limited to an FAR of 2.0, and except within the Silver Terrace Courty ards Overlay District where the nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.75. Residential uses may comprise up to 15% of the total floor area of the General Co mmercial Land Use designation. Residential uses are permitted either in conjunctio n with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use subject to Conditional Use approval . Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre, except in R edevelopment Area #6 (Lindell/Federal Highway) where residential densiti es may be allowed up to a maximum of 16 units per acre subject to Conditional Use app roval and the criteria outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for that area and within the Sil ver Terra ce Courtyards Overlay District where residential densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 22 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. Areas wit h the General Commercial designation, located within a workforce housing ove rlay district, may also exceed 12 units per acre up to a maximum of 30 units per acre within the Four Corners Overlay District and 18 units per acre within the infill wo rkforce housing area, by obtaining density bonuses through the provision of workforce housing units. Change: REVISION General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or sh ould be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. reta il, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are perm issible under this desig nation when located in the special overlay district betwee n Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north Cit y limit. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses, except as indicated within the follow ing overlay districts: for mixed -use development within the Four Corners Overlay Dis trict, where the nonresidential component is limited to an FAR of 2.0, and except within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where th e nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 0.75. x Four Corners Overlay District - For mixed -use development within this overlay district, the nonresidential component is limited t o an FAR of 2.0 x Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District - Nonresidential development is lim ited to an FAR of 0.75 x Waterford Overlay District - Nonresidential development is limited to an FAR of 1.32 . Residential uses may comprise up to 15% of the tota l floor area of the General Commercial Land Use designation. Residential uses a re permitted either in conjunction with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use subj ect to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 d welling units per acre, except in Redevelopment Area #6 (Lindell/Federal Highway) whe re residential d ensities may be allowed up to a maximum of 16 units per acre subjec t to Conditional Use approval and the criteria outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for that area and within the Silver Terrace Courtyards Overlay District where residenti al densities may be allowed up to a maximum of 22 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. Areas with the General Commercial designation, located within a wo rkforce housing overlay district, may also exceed 12 units per acre up to a maximum o f 30 units per acre wit hin the Four ( 17 ) Corners Overlay District and 18 units per acre with in the infill workforce housing area, by obtaining density bonuses through the provision of workforce housing units. Comment: The 4.58 acres within the proposed Waterford Development overlay district has a current Future Land Use designation of TRN (Transitional ). A Future Land Use Map amendment (See Support Document #2 1 ) i s being processed concurrently to change the FLUM designation to GC (General Commercial). The overlay district is being created to allow mixed -use development on the property at a nonresidential intensity lower than that currently allowed within the GC designation . The maximum intensity for nonresidential uses within the overlay district will be set at a n FAR of 1.32 . The max imum density for residential development will remai n unchanged at 12 du.ac. Existing and proposed colored Future Land Use Maps, which also include the overlay district, are attached as Support Document #15. The concurrency analysis assumes development of the entire property within the overlay district at the maximum intensity allowed u nder the amended description for the General Commercial designation. As shown on the fol lowing table, development under this provision would result in an increase of nonre sidential development potential from the current 199,505 square feet to 263,346 square f eet. The maximum residential density will remain the same at 12 du/ac. The maximum development potential with the proposed amendment w ould be a mixed - use project with residential development at 12 unit s per acre and retail development at a maximum FAR of 1.32 as indicated above. A comparati ve analysis of the maximum development potential of the property has been prov ided below. Table 1: Maximum Development Potential Water ford Park – Parcel “B” EXISTING PROPOSED FLUM (acres) Maximum Development Potential FLUM (acres) Maximum Mixed Use Development Potential TRN (4.58 acres) Mixed -Use 55 Multi -Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 199,505 SF Retail (FAR 1.0) GC (4.58 acres) Mixed -Use 55 Multi -Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 2 63 ,346 SF Retail (FAR 1.32) Traffic: An analysis of the traffic impacts associated with the maximum development potential of a mixed -use development on the property was cond ucted by Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. The entire Kimley -Horn Traffic Impact Analysis is attached as Support Document #16. As shown on Table 2 below, the new ma ximum land use mix will represent a net increase in potential traffic volum es. Table 2 indicates a net new external trip increase of 1,772 ADT (Average Daily Traffic), with 51 AM peak hour trips and 196 PM peak hour trips with the proposed 1.32 F AR (Floor Area Ratio). Kimley - Horn and Associates, indicated in its report that “based on the analyses within this study, the future land use map amendment is expecte d to continue to allow the significantly impacted roadways to operate acceptab ly upon build -out of the development site.” ( 18 ) Table 2: Trip Generation Comparison - Maximum Intensity Waterford Park ( 19 ) Water & Sewer: Water treatment is provided by the City of Delray Beach at the Wate r Treatment Plant. The geographic service area coincides with the Plan ning Area plus service provided to the Town of Gulf Stream through contract as a bulk customer. The service area encompasses approximately 18 square miles. The trea tment plant, with a capacity of 28 million gallons per day, was constructed in 1972 an d has a programmed life of 50 years (2022). The water supply is provided from 30 active wells i n fou r wellfields, yielding a total design capacity of 37.2 mgd. The City’s consu mptive use permit currently limits the annual withdraw rate to 6.937 billion gallons which equates to an average of 19 mgd (million ga l lons per day). Water demand projections for the City’s Water Service Area were calculated based on the City’s population projections multiplied by the projected per capita demands. Potable water demand projections, credits for the u se of reclaimed water and the total excess/deficit for the years 20 10 through 2030 are given in the following table. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adeq uate capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum development potenti al with the FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR (Floor Area Ratio) to 1.32. Potable Water Demand Projections Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Service Area Population 69,335 74,504 81,114 82,233 82,556 Per Capita Use (gpd) 240 240 240 240 240 Avg. Daily Demand (MG) 16.64 17.88 19.47 19.74 19.81 Permit Base Condition (MGD) 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 Excess/(Deficit) (MGD) 2.36 1.12 (0.47) (0.74) (0.81) Alternative sources Reclaimed Water Credits for Ground Water Demand Removal 1.08 1.895 1.895 1.895 1.895 Potable demand removal 0.39 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Excess/Deficit 3.83 3.85 2.27 2.00 1.92 Notes: 1. Population projections based on Palm Beach County 2 007 Population Allocation Model using March 2008 BEBR Population Pr ojections. 2. Per capita use assumes a 10% reduction from current permitted values achieved through conservation. 3. Permit base condition as provided by SFWMD per grou nd water availability rule. Wastewater from the City is treated at the South Co unty Reg ional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWWTP), which is managed by the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board, established in 1974 through an agreement between the cities of Delray Beach and Boynton Beac h. The SCRWWTP has the capacity to provide up to 24 mgd of reclaimed -quality water. In 2003, the City developed a Reclaimed Water Master Plan, which identified 16 areas for reclaimed water application. The City is currently using reclaimed water to irrigate several golf courses and is installing additional transmission lines to serve other large users. Through the ( 20 ) use of reclaimed water, the City’s 20 -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan indicates that water supply facilities are planned and will b e available to meet the future growth a nd water demands of the City of Delray Beach throug h the year 2030. The wastewater treatment plant was constructed in 1 979, with a programmed life of 50 years (2029). Ultimate disposal was o r iginally by ocean discharge of secondary effluent and land spreading of sludge. In late 2008, deep we ll injection replaced the ocean discharge except for emergency situations and DEP permitted exceptions. Also in la te 2008, with completion of the Palm Beach County Bios olids Pelletization facility, land spreading of sludge is longer being used. The desig n capacity of the treatment plant, established by its secondary treatment capacity, is 24 mgd. This capacity is shared equally between Boynton Beach and Delray Beach. Th e current plant has adequate capacity to service the City’s projected population beyond the year 2025. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate wa stewater treatment capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum deve lopment potential with the FLUM amendment and associate d text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresid ential FAR to 1.32. Since adequate capacity is available in the City’s water and waste water systems to meet the increased demand, the proposed FLUM amendm ent will not impact the level of service standard for these facilities. Drainage : The adopted LOS standard for drainage is the SFWMD standard of retention of the first one inch of runoff or 2.5 inches of water storage t imes the percentage of impervious area. Drainage is reviewed during the site plan app lication process for individual projects. Within this area of the City, drainage is usually accommodated on site via ex - filtration trench systems or swale retention areas. There are no problems anticipated with obtaining South Florida Water Management Dist rict permits within the area and any additional impacts caused by increased impervious a rea will not affect the level of service standard. Parks & Recreation The Open Space and Recreation Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan indicates in its conclusi on that “The City will have sufficient recreation facilitie s at build -out to meet the adopted standards.” The LOS standard for open space and recreation in t he city is 3 acres per 1,000 residents. The amount of land curre ntly provided in activity based rec reation facilities, the municipal beaches, and the two public golf courses, establishes a level of service of 6.2 acres per 1,000 residents (2007), far exceeding the general guideline. A park impact fee is collected to offset any impact s that new development may have on the City’s recreational facilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, a park impact fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior t o issuance of a building permit for each residential unit. Since there is no net increase in the resi dential development potential on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment and a ssociated text amendment which ( 21 ) limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 1.32, this level of service standard is not affected. Education (School Concurrency): Since there is no net increase in the residential development pote ntial (12 units per acre – 55 total allowed under each designation) on this si te with the proposed FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment which limit s the maximum nonresidential FAR to 1.32, this le vel of service standard is not affected. Solid Waste: As shown on the following table, with the proposed amendment, the development of the property would result in a net increase of 326 tons per year in solid waste generation. In its annual capacity letter, dated January 6, 2010, the Solid Waste Authority indicates that it has sufficient capacity for concurrency man agement and comprehensive planning purposes. As stated in the letter, “Capacity is ava ilable for both the coming year, and the five and ten year planning periods specified in 9J -5-005(4).” Based on population projections, waste generation rate projections, was te reduction, and recycling, the Solid Waste Authority forecasts that capacity will be ava ilable at the existing landfill through approx imately the year 2030. The Board of the Solid Waste Authority has authorized the initial design and permitting efforts to develop a new landfill on 1,600 acres owned by the authority. The capacity of this new landfill wo uld extend the life of the solid was te system beyond the year 2043 or later. Table 3: Solid Waste Generation Waterford Overlay District Existing Maximum Development Potential Proposed Mixed -Use Maximum Development Potential 199,505 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 1,017 tons/year 55 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 28.6 tons/yr 2 63 ,346 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 1,343 tons/year 55 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 28.6 tons/yr ( 22 ) AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP CITY -INITIATED FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT: 1. Future Land Use Map amendment to assign a City Futu re Land Use Map designation concurrently with the annexation of “Th e Marketplace of Delray”, containing approximately 30.26 acres of property lo cated at the northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail. The curren t County Land Use Map des ignation is CH/8 (Commercial High with an underlyin g Residential of 8 units per acre) and the proposed City designation is GC (Gene ral Commercial). See Support Document #17 – Marketplace at Delray – Annexation, FLUM Amendment and Rezoning staff report . Ex isting and proposed colored Future Land Use Maps are attached as Support Document #18. PRIVATELY -INITIATED FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS : 2. Future Land Use Map amendment for the approximately 7.08 acre Lintco property located on the north side of Linton Boulevard, west of SW 4th Avenue, from MD (Residential Medium Density 5 -12 du/acre) to GC (General Commercial). See Support Document #19 – Lintco Development – FLUM Amendment and Rezoning staff report. Existing and proposed colored Future Land Use Maps ar e attached as Support Document #13 . 3. Future Land Use Map amendment for a 4.58 acre parce l located within Waterford, east of I -95, south of Linton Boulevard , from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial). See Support Document #20 – Waterford – FLUM A mendment staff report. Existing and proposed colored Future Land Use Maps are attac hed as Support Document #15 . s:\planning & zoning \longrange \comp \amend 10 -1\adoption \10 -1 maindoc adopt.doc COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #1 Capital Improvement Element Existing Table CI -CIP, Five Year Capital Improvements Schedule For Projects > $25,000 SD #1 PROJECT & FUND FY 2008-09FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 RECREATION IMPACT FEE A tlantic Dunes Exotic Species Repl 00160,00000 NW 1st Avenue Park 78,8000000 Oakmont Park Improvements 78,8000000 TOTALS :$157,600$0 $160,000$0 $0 BEAUTIFICATION TRUST FUN D Computerized Irrigation Syst-Pks Medians50,00050,00050,00000 TOTALS :$50,000$50,000$50,000$0 $0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND Hope III Acquisitions 17,33017,330000 Ship Program-State Grant 568,630551,571535,024518,973503,404 Western Settlers' Grant Program 55,0000000 Beacon Ctr - Village Program 777,310816,176856,984899,833944,825 Disaster Recovery Initiative 0800,000000 Planning Administration 99,960102,959106,042109,223112,499 Housing Rehab -Federal Grant 252,630235,440235,440235,440235,440 Unsafe Bldgs, Land Acqu, Bike Paths, Neighborhood Resources137,5 40150,000163,430143,469125,000 Grants and Aids - Federal Grant - Economic Development86,50019,56 4000 Neighborhood Housing 182,980185,710186,000186,000185,296 TOTAL S $2,177,880$2,878,750$2,082,920$2,092,938$2,106,464 BEACH RESTORATION FUN D Beach Renourishment-Fill Placement 0007,250,0000 Beach Tilling 000015,130 Construction Surveys 46,69047,86049,77051,76053,840 Environmental Construction 00265,000265,00068,500 Final and Construction Engineering 0093,00070,0000 Final Engineering/ Bid and Negotiation 0023,50000 Other Expenses 7,0507,0507,0507,0507,050 Sea Turtles Monitoring 38,75038,75038,75040,30041,510 Update Geotech/Preliminary Study 428,5000000 Yearly replacement (snow fence)8,0008,0008,0008,0008,000 TOTALS :$528,990$101,660$485,070$7,692,110$194,030 GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS A tlantic Dunes Boardwalk completion 080,000000 Bleachers-Community Center-Replace 0055,00000 Block 20 Alley Improvements 110,0000000 Block 32 Alley Improvements 00130,00000 Building Maintenance Annual Program 151,800235,800185,800235,800190,800 Bus Shelters (12 shelter throughout city)322,0000000 Carpet Replacement -Police Dept 065,000000 City Hall A/C System Upgrade 50,0000000 Clay Court Rehab-Tennis Cente r 60,00060,00060,00060,00060,000 Computers and Related Equipment-Replacement 110,000110,0001 50,000150,000150,000 Disk Storage Space Increase-Finance/IT 60,0000000 Dixie Hwy-US 1 Connector (NE 22nd Lane-constr)150,0000000 East Atlantic Avenue - resurfacing 104,0000000 Exchange Archiving Software-Finance/It 063,000000 Family Recreation & Fitness Center Furniture & Fixtures0283,9100 00 Family Recreation & Fitness Center-constr facility011,937,580000 Federal Highway Beautification-Phase 1 360,0002,400,000000 Federal Highway Beautification-Phase 2 00330,0003,300,0000 Federal Highway Beautification-Phase 3 000225,0001,500,000 Fire Rescue Training Center 00370,000580,00075,000 Fire Sprinkler & Alarm System -80 Depot Avenue- Fire040,000000 Fire Station #1 Entry and Courtyard Improvements0000372,600 Fire-Station #1 Hardening Study/Const 0060,000330,0000 Gateway Mini Parks - W Atlantic Ave-I95/SW/NW 12th Ave1,300,000000 0 Generator Upgrade-Fire Rescue Headquarters 00015,000250,000 In-Car Audio Visual Cameras-Police Department0150,000150,000150,00090,000 Internal Building Data Cabling-Replace 42,5000000 Laptop Computers-Police Dept-Replace 0395,250170,00000 Livescan Software System-Police Department35,0000000 Martin Luther King Drive Improvements 296,0000000 Mobile Vehicle Laptops-Fire-Rescue Vehicle 00112,500112,5000 Mobile Vehicular Radio Repeaters-Fire 0125,00050,00050,0000 Motorola 3.0 Radio System-Replacement 06,000,000000 Naviline Software-Finance/IT (Window based HTE)0170,000000 NE 8th Ave pavement - North of Bond Way 000086,000 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 CI-26 PROJECT & FUND FY 2008-09FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 Neighborhood Enhancements/Improvements 0000246,000 Office Expansion/ Parks Maintenance 00105,00000 Old School Square-Window Replacement647,4000000 Omnitrak Latent work station equip-Police Dept 0114,000000 Osceola Park Improvements 394,250394,250000 Parking Lot Refurbish-Police Department 0000100,000 Pineapple Grove Sidewalks 00173,00000 Pocket Parks-Construction 00050,00050,000 Police Dept - Lobby Renovation 000049,500 Police Dept - Repl Van's platform 00155,51000 Railroad-Crossing Annual Rehabilitation Program95,00096,750 130,000114,000115,473 Range Ballistic Backstop-Replacement Police Dept045,000000 SE 2nd St - S Swinton Ave to FEC x-ing 000344,0000 Seacrest Blvd-NE 8th St-Gulfstream Blvd-St Reconst0000417,000 Second Floor addition-outside Evidence Rm 000307,5000 Server Replacement- Software Upgrade 0550,000000 Shade Systems - Pompey Parks 0044,00000 Sidewalks/Bike Paths 050,00050,0000110,000 Skid Car for driver training-Police Dept 045,000000 Software integration Application-Police Dept.1,197,4200000 Special Events Response Vehicle, new-Fire 000025,000 Street Light Poles-Replacement 040,00040,00040,00040,000 Street Resurface/Reconstruction-yrly program 75,000175,000175,00017 5,000175,000 SW 12th Avenue/Auburn Imprv 1,500,0000000 SW 14th Ave - SW 2nd st to SW 1st St & Alleys453,7000000 SW 1st Ave - SW 1st St to W. Atlantic Avenue 0000449,500 SW 29th St-SW 22nd Avenue Sidewalks 288,0000000 SW 2nd Avenue@West Atlantic Signalization330,0000000 Teen Center Renovation 050,000000 Telemetry Installations-City Emergency Generators025,000000 Telephone System-Fire-Rescue Facility -Replace 00100,00000 Traffic Calming - Annual Improvements 000230,000 Training Room Remodel-Police Dept 0055,00000 Veterans Park Master Plan 45,0000000 VMware Server Replacement 000125,0000 TOTALS :$8,177,070$23,700,540$2,850,810$6,363,800$4,781,873 CITY MARINA FUND Pump Out Station 44,4200000 TOTALS :$44,420$0 $0 $0 $0 WATER/SEWER NEW CAPITAL OUTLAY ESD-Compound Screen Wall 0125,000000 Greenbriar Dr Sewer-new sanitary sewer sy s 0269,000000 Lab Information Mgmt System for ESD Lab27,0000000 Reclaimed Water Distribution/Customer Connection0150,000150,000150,000150,000 Reclaimed Water Master Plan 00000 Reclaimed Water Transmission System2,100,0001,304,2942,350,000 2,350,0002,327,883 Sludge Thickener (new)800,0000000 Telephone System - new 0125,000000 TOTALS :$2,927,000$1,973,294$2,500,000$2,500,000$2,477,883 WATER/SEWER RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT FUND Block 32 Water Main Improvements 00116,30000 Computer Equipment annual replacement 25,5000000 Delray Shores water main upgrade 000768,450768,450 Eldorado Lane & Sunshine Dr.-Water Main upgrades000490,650 Elevated Storage Tank Maintenance 17,00017,00017,00019,00019,000 Federal Highway Beautification -Phase 3 000397,000 Federal Highway Beautification-Phase 1 15,000100,000000 Federal Highway Beautification-Phase 2 00388,5000 Hydrant Maintenance 25,00025,00025,00000 Internal Building Data Cabling-Replace 42,5000000 Laboratory Chromatography Unit Repl 55,0000000 Lake Drive Water main upgrades 0216,000000 Lift Station Rehabilitation #107,85,94A,26A65,00065,0 0065,00065,00065,000 Lift Station Upgrades along Congress Ave45,00045,000124,000 00 Lowson Blvd Force Main Replacement 00310,00000 NE 2nd Ave Water Main Repl 0000279,000 NE 3rd Aven Water Main Upgrade 0086,00000 NE 8th Avenue - North of Bond Way-extend Wtr Main000086,000 NE 8th Avenue-Water Main Upgrade 386,8500000 North Lake Ida Area-wtr main upgrade 0469,334235,16600 CI-27 PROJECT & FUND FY 2008-09FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 NW 4th & NW 4th Avenue-wtr main upgrade 00593,00000 Osceola Park 100,000850,000000 Production Well Rehabilitation 100,000100,000100,000100,000100,000 Sanitary Sewer Main Rehabilitation 150,000150,000150,000150,000150,000 Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation 50,00050,00050,00050,00050,000 Seacrest Blvd-NE 8th St Gulfstream Blvd-Wtr Main000035,000 SW 10th Ave - SW 2nd St to W Atlantic Ave 0000403,000 SW 12 & 13 Avenue Water Main 350,0000000 SW 1st AV & SE 4th St to SE 2nd St main upgrade000238,6000 SW 1st AV & SW 4th St-wtr main upgrade 0093,00000 SW 3rd St, SW 3rd Ave,SW 6th Ave wtr main upgrade0435,000435,000 00 SW 6th Street Water Main 93,0000000 SW14th Ave-Wtr Main upgrade 0000114,900 Transfer to Garage Fund (Hoist Replacement)40,0000000 Utility Asst Management/Wrk Order System150,0000000 Water Main Leak Repairs 75,00075,00075,00075,00075,000 Water Meter Replacement 150,000150,000150,000150,000150,000 Water Service Relocations 25,00025,00025,00025,00025,000 Water Valve Replacement 36,00036,00036,00036,00036,000 Wet Well Rehabilitation of Bldg Lift Station70,00070,00070,00070,00070,000 WTP - Vacuum drum Filter Rehabilation 215,0000000 TOTALS :$2,280,850$2,878,334$2,755,466$2,626,200$2,823,350 MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE Machinery/Equipment( <$25,000)69,50070,00075,00080,00085,000 Other Improvements(<$25,000)22,80025,00025,00025,00025,000 Debt Service 413,980409,550409,220406,260409,750 Debt Service-Cart Lease 35,45035,4508,90000 TOTALS :$541,730$540,000$518,120$511,260$519,750 LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE Debt Service-Bonds 249,900220,140223,720223,291225,390 Debt Service-Cart Lease 26,18031,61031,6107,9000 LakeView Green Renovation Project 00000 Other Machinery & Equipment (<$25,000)5,4005,0005,0005,0005,000 TOTALS :$281,480$256,750$260,330$236,191$230,390 STORMWATER UTILIT Y A llen Avenue Drainage 98,0000000 Block 32 Alley-Drainage System 0086,00000 Dotteral Road-Audubon Blvd 000086,000 Federal Highway Phase 1 62,000410,000000 Federal Highway Phase 2 000431,0000 Federal Highway Phase 3 0000454,000 General Storm Water Repairs 80,00080,00080,00080,00080,000 Lowson @ Homewood Roundabou t 0000150,000 NE 8th Avenue from N of Bond way 000086,000 S Swinton Ave @ SW/SE 4th St.000186,5000 SE 2nd Street - S Swinton Avenue to FEC x-ing000230,0000 Seacrest Blvd-NE 8th to Gulfstream Blvd Drainage0000112,500 Storm Water Vac Con Truck 300,0000000 SW 14th Ave - SW 2nd St to SW 1st St Drainage425,0000000 SW 1st Ave - SW 1st St to W Atlantic Ave Drainage0000230,000 TOTALS :$965,000$490,000$166,000$927,500$1,198,500 CENTRAL GARAGE FUN D Capital <$25,000 $44,8000000 Fire Apparatus Maint. Building 075,000000 Fire Apparatus Replace Brush Truck 000303,8000 Fire Apparatus Replace Pumpers 00559,80000 Fire-ALS Rescue Replace 0243,900268,900282,400296,520 Hoist Replacement on Truck 420 40,0000000 Fire Engine Repl - 2002 Pierce 1,288,2700000 Police Dept. - Mobile Command Vehicle 0245,680000 Vehicle Replacement 762,000784,860850,0001,125,0001,150,000 Vehicle Restoration 70,00070,50074,02577,73081,620 TOTALS :$2,205,070$1,419,940$1,752,725$1,788,930$1,528,140 CI-28 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #2 Capital Improvement Element Updated Table CI -CIP, Five Year Capital Improvements Schedule For Projects > $25,000 SD #2 Updated 5-Year CIP PROJECT & FUND FY 2010-11FY 2011-12FY 2012-13FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 RECREATION IMPACT FEE Worthing Park Improvements 197,0000000 TOTALS :$197,000$0 $0 $0 $0 BEAUTIFICATION TRUST FUN D Computerized Irrigation System 50,00050,000 TOTALS :$50,000$50,000$0 $0 $0 NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES FUN D Western Settlers' Grnt Prog 50,00050,00050,00050,00050,000 Curb Apeal 60,00060,00060,00060,00060,000 Neighborhood Stabilization-FED 69,1100000 Neighborhood Stabilization-DC A 600,0000000 Disaster Recovery Initiative 735,910536,600000 Planning Administration 111,790111,790111,790111,790111,790 Housing Rehab -Federal Grant 334,550334,550334,550334,550334,550 Unsafe Bldgs/Lnd Acqu/Bike Paths/Neighborhd Resources89,11057,53 094,13094,13094,130 Grnts/Aids-Fed Grant-Econ Devel 94,00094,00094,00094,00094,000 Neighborhood Housing 185,200185,200185,200185,200185,200 TOTAL S $2,329,670$1,429,670$929,670$929,670$929,670 BEACH RESTORATION FUN D Beach Tilling 0015,12515,58016,050 Final&Constr Engineering 118,00070,000000 Other Expenses 6,5006,5006,5006,5006,500 Pre/Post Constr Surveys 49,54051,02052,55054,12555,750 Construction- Pre & Post 153,000265,00068,50000 Construction Loan Interest 0365,000000 Renoruish-Fill Placemnt 09,000,000000 Sea Turtle Monitoring 38,75040,30041,51042,75544,038 Yearly replacement (snow fence)8,0008,0008,0008,0008,000 TOTALS :$373,790$9,805,820$192,185$126,960$130,33 8 GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS A tl Dunes Nature Trail 098,000000 A tl Ave St Light Post Rplmnt 50,00050,00050,00050,00050,000 Beach Beautification Plan 073,90073,90073,90073,900 Block 32 Alley 130,0000000 Building Maintenance 150,000150,000150,000150,000150,000 City Hall Chiller Upgrades 50,0000000 Clay Court Rehab-Tennis Cente r 60,00060,00060,00060,00060,000 Comm Center/Pompey AC 90,0000000 Currie Park Renovation 0150,000000 Downtown Parking Lots/Garage 0363,700000 Family Rec & Fitness Ctr 004,844,40000 Family Rec & Fitness Ctr-Equip,etc 00292,46000 Fed Hwy Beautification 09,950,000000 Fire Dept - Defib/Monitor 52,00052,00052,00052,0000 Fire Dept Sev Unit 0025,000025,000 Fire EMS Billing Software 40,0000000 Fire HQ Generator Upgrade 00265,00000 Fire HQ Hardening 0000394,950 Fire HQ Public Plaza 35,000225,000000 Fire Training Ctr Restoration 25,0000000 Fire Video Conference Server 0030,00000 Fire Zoll Med Autopulse 62,8000000 Fleet Tire Bay Reroof 40,0000000 Hilltopper Stadium Fence 0041,50000 IT-Computer/Equip Repl 62,00090,00090,00090,00090,000 IT-Data Cabling/Switch 070,000000 IT-Tape Backup System 35,0000000 Little Fenway Park Bldg 300,0000000 Mangrove Boat Ramp 190,0000000 Merritt Park Renovation 0150,000000 Miller Park Shade System 000086,100 Mobile Vehicle Laptops-Fire 112,5000000 NE 3rd Street Scape 103,5000000 NE 8th Av Paving 000084,300 Neighborhood Enhancmts 0230,000150,000240,000240,000 New Financial System 0700,000000 Office Expansion-Parks 00103,50000 Pineapple Grove Sidewalks 00201,27500 Police AED's 060,00080,00000 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 CI-26 Updated 5-Year CIP PROJECT & FUND FY 2010-11FY 2011-12FY 2012-13FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 Police Comp RM Relocate 047,000000 Police Exterior Painting 30,0000000 Police Fclty/Roof Maint 25,0000000 Police Firing Range Repl 45,0000000 Police In-Car Video System 0150,000156,000150,0000 Police Motorola Radio 006,000,00000 Police Stop Sticks 29,9000000 Police Evidence Rm-2nd Flr 0030,350265,9500 PoliceOmniTrak Latent Sta 0114,000000 Pompey Prk-Shade System 0066,00000 Pompey Concession Stand 218,5000000 Pompey Pool Redesign 0356,500000 RR X-ing Annual Maint 206,000107,000112,300117,900123,800 SE 2 St - S Swinton to FEC 0197,000000 Seacrest Bv NE8St Gstream 000419,7000 Sidewalks/Bikepaths 50,00050,000050,00050,000 Street Resurf/Reconstr 220,000175,000175,000175,000225,000 SW 1 Av-SW 1 St to Atl Av 000446,5000 SW 2 St Beautification 370,0000000 Telephone System-Fire 00100,00000 Tennis Center Storage Bld 0025,00000 Tennis Stadium Bolt R/R 25,00025,00025,00025,00025,000 Tennis Stadium Maint 25,0000000 Traffic Calming 0050,00050,000100,000 Veterans Park 001,023,55000 VMware Server Replacemnt 00320,000320,0000 TOTALS :$2,832,200$13,694,100$14,592,235$2,735,950$1,778,05 0 CITY MARINA FUND Riverwal k 0000580,000 TOTALS :$0 $0 $0 $0 $580,000 WATER/SEWER NEW CAPITAL OUTLAY Greenbriar Dr. Sewe r 000280,0000 Reclaimed Water Customer Connections200,000175,00075,00022 5,0000 Reclaim Water, Area 12A 1,500,0000000 Reclaim Water, Area 12B 02,500,000000 Reclaim Water Area 6 002,500,00000 Reclaim Water Area 8 0001,500,0000 Reclaim Water Area 9 000300,0000 Reclaim Water Area 10 00002,000,000 Reclaim Water Area 14A 00001,000,000 TOTALS :$1,700,000$2,675,000$2,575,000$2,305,000$3,000,000 WATER/SEWER RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT FUND A utomated Mtr Rdng (AMR)0500,000500,000500,000700,000 Block 32 Alley 75,0000000 Bldg LS Wet Well Rehab 70,00070,00070,00070,00070,000 ESD Computer R/R 11,00011,00011,00011,00011,000 Congress Ave LS upgrades 0124,000000 Delray Shores W/M 00623,200749,2000 Eldorado/Sunshine W M 000494,5000 Elevated Storage Tank Maint.17,00019,00019,00019,00019,000 Fed Hwy Beautification 0125,000000 IT-Data Cabling/Switch 70,0000000 Large Water Mtr Rplcmnts 65,00065,00065,00000 Lift Station Rehab 75,00075,00075,00075,00075,000 Lowson Blvd FM 460,0000000 LS100A Capacity Study 60,000350,000000 NE 8th Av Paving 000050,000 NE 8th Ave WM 0175,000000 NW 4 Av & 3 Av WM 593,4000000 NW 12th Av WM 0000402,500 New Financial System 0250,000000 Osceola Park WM Ph2 773,4650000 Production Well Rehab 100,000100,000100,000100,000100,000 Public Utility Generator Rplcmt 75,00075,00075,000100,000100,000 San Swr Main Rehab 150,000150,000150,000150,000150,000 San Swr Manhole Rehab 50,00050,00050,00050,00050,000 Seacrest Bv-NE8St Gstream 00050,0000 SW 10th Av WM 402,5000000 SW 11th Av WM 0000103,500 SW 1st Av WM 98,9000000 CI-27 Updated 5-Year CIP PROJECT & FUND FY 2010-11FY 2011-12FY 2012-13FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 Utility Asst Mgmt W/O System 0150,000000 Water Main Leak Repairs 75,00075,00075,00075,00070,000 Water Meter Replacement 500,000500,000500,000500,000450,000 Water Service Relocation 25,00025,00025,00025,00025,000 Water Valve Replacement 36,00036,00036,00036,00036,000 WTP San Survey Compliance 70,0000000 TOTALS :$3,852,265$2,925,000$2,374,200$3,004,700$2,412,000 MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE Machinery/Equipment( <$25,000)68,00080,00085,00085,00085,000 Other Improvements(<$25,000)025,00025,00025,00025,000 Debt Service 411,490411,490411,490411,490411,490 Debt Service-Cart Lease 32,46032,46032,46032,46032,460 TOTALS :$511,950$548,950$553,950$553,950$553,950 LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE Debt Service-Bonds 223,710223,291225,389163,551164,619 Debt Service-Cart Lease 025,00025,00025,00025,000 Other Machinery & Equipment 20,00025,00025,00025,00025,000 TOTALS :$243,710$273,291$275,389$213,551$214,619 STORMWATER UTILITY FUND A uburn Ave Improv 200,0000000 Bay St Pump Sta Imprv 172,5000000 Block 32 Alley 71,0000000 Downtown Parking Lots/Garages 106,3000000 Fed Hwy Beautification 0676,000000 Gen Storm Water Repairs 80,0000000 Gleason Street Drainage 0060,00000 NE 8th Av Paving 000075,000 New Financial System 0250,000000 Palm Trail Drainage 30,0000000 SE 2 St - Swinton FEC 00240,00000 Seacrest Bv-NE 8St Gstream 000162,8000 Storm Wtr Pmp Stat. Rehab 100,00070,000225,000225,000225,000 SW 1 Av-SW 1 St /Atlantic Av 000232,0000 SW 2 St Beautification 150,0000000 SW Area Swales 75,000075,00075,00075,000 Tropic Blvd Alley Improv 50,0000000 TOTALS :$1,034,800$996,000$600,000$694,800$375,000 CENTRAL GARAGE FUN D A LS Rescue Repl 268,900282,400296,600311,4000 Brush Truck Replacement 0303,80000 Fire Apparatus Replace-Pumpers 559,8000000 Police Mobile Command Veh 0550,000000 TV Truck Repl -ESD 0131,000000 Sewer Van Con Repl 306,0000000 Vehicle Replacement - 2011 850,000855,000860,000865,000870,000 Vehicle Restoration - 2011 70,50070,60070,70070,80070,900 Police-VIN Platform Replacement 00155,600 TOTALS :$2,055,200$1,889,000$1,686,700$1,247,200$940,900 SPECIAL PROJECT FUND - PUBLIC ARTS PROGRA M Family Recreation and Fitness Center 0067,59000 TOTAL S $0 $0 $67,590$0 $0 CI-28 COM PREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #3 Capital Improvement Element Existing Table SD -CIP, School District of Palm Beach County Capital Improvement Schedule SD #3 COM PREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #4 Capital Improvement Element Updated Table SD -CIP, School District of Palm Beach County Capital Improvement Schedule SD #4 1 TABLE SD -CIP - SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROV EMENT SCHEDULE 2 TABLE SD -CIP - SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROV EMENT SCHEDULE 3 TABLE SD -CIP - SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROV EMENT SCHEDULE 4 T ABLE SD -CIP - SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROV EMENT SCHEDULE 5 TABLE SD -CIP - SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROV EMENT SCHEDULE 6 TABLE SD -CIP - SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROV EMENT SCHEDULE COMP REHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #5 Capital Improvement Element T able RW -C IP Existing Reclaimed Water Capital Improvement Schedule SD #5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #6 Capital Improvement Element T able RW -C IP Updated Reclaimed Water Capital Improvement Schedule SD #6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #7 Capital Improvement Element Existing General Fund Revenue and Expenditure 5-Year Forecast Table SD #7 CI - 12 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #8 Capital Improvement Element Updated General Fund Revenue and Expenditure 5-Year Forecast Table SD #8 GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FIVE YEAR FORECAST BUDGETESTIMATEDESTIMATEDESTIMATEDESTIMATED REVENUES (1) (2)FY 10FY 11FY 12FY 13FY 14 AD VALOREM TAXES52,078,456 46,416,548 46,371,008 47,660,539 47,816,052 AD VALOREM TAXES - DELINQUENT164,544 260,000 266,500 273,163 279,992 SALES AND USE TAXES1,300,000 1,357,420 1,391,356 1,426,139 1,461,793 FRANCHISE TAXES5,290,900 5,298,020 5,430,471 5,566,232 5,705,388 UTILITY TAXES5,007,960 5,109,000 5,236,725 5,367,643 5,501,834 OTHER TAXES3,980,000 3,980,000 4,079,500 4,181,488 4,286,025 LICENSES/PERMITS3,836,310 3,376,300 3,460,708 3,547,225 3,635,906 INTERGOVERNMENTAL6,120,058 5,962,570 6,111,634 6,264,425 6,421,036 CHARGES FOR SERVICES8,720,747 9,189,430 9,419,166 9,654,645 9,896,011 FINES & FORFEITURES649,400 885,500 907,638 930,328 953,587 INTERFUND TRANSFERS15,500 15,500 15,000 20,000 20,000 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS3,418,350 3,659,890 3,751,387 3,845,172 3,941,301 RECOVERY OF ADMINSTRATIVE COSTS2,313,000 2,613,970 2,679,319 2,746,302 2,814,960 MISCELLANEOUS 2,852,630 2,930,580 3,003,845 3,078,941 3,155,914 SUB-TOTAL95,747,855 91,054,728 92,124,255 94,562,243 95,889,797 PRIOR YEAR SURPLUS 621,210 73,411 125,000 - 164,339 PRIOR YEAR ENCUMBRANCES308,862 - - - - T OTAL REVENUES96,677,927 91,128,139 92,249,255 94,562,243 96,054,136 EXPENDITURES (3) GENERAL GOVERNMENT7,147,949 6,669,036 6,735,727 6,870,441 7,007,850 POLICE DEPARTMENT27,578,082 25,730,351 25,987,654 26,507,407 27,037,555 FIRE DEPARTMENT23,015,065 21,473,056 21,687,786 22,121,542 22,563,973 PLANNING AND ZONING1,183,830 1,104,513 1,115,559 1,137,870 1,160,627 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT2,902,350 2,707,893 2,734,971 2,789,671 2,845,464 ENGINEERING 675,144 629,909 636,208 648,933 661,911 ENV SVC/PUBLIC WORKS3,954,474 3,689,524 3,726,419 3,800,948 3,876,967 PARKS & RECREATION12,411,253 11,579,699 11,695,496 12,179,406 12,922,994 TRANSFERS 9,703,093 9,052,986 9,143,516 9,326,386 9,512,914 GRANTS & MISC. EXPENSE1,854,857 1,730,582 1,747,887 1,782,845 1,818,502 DEBTSERVICEGO 3576620 3576540 3573840 3569827 2168937 DEBT SERVICE - G.O.3,576,620 3,576,540 3,573,840 3,569,827 2,168,937 DEBT SERVICE - UTIL TAX1,205,620 1,252,500 1,246,500 1,245,700 1,294,900 DEBT SERVICE - NON AD VALOREM REV 1,364,450 1,596,200 1,604,750 1,605,663 1,572,542 DEBT SERVICE - LEASE82,300 185,350 185,350 189,057 189,000 D. S. - NON AD VALOREM PROPOSED (4)- 150,000 425,000 695,000 1,420,000 CONTINGENCY 22,840 2,591 91,548 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 96 ,677 ,927 91 ,128 ,139 92 ,249 ,255 94 ,562 ,243 96 ,054 ,136 TOTAL INCREASE OVER THE PRIOR YEAR-6%1%3%2% ASSESSED VALUE - 1000'S7,010,118 6,271,870 5,644,683 5,729,353 5,843,940 OPERATING MILLAGE - CURR7.1900 7.1900 7.9809 8.1006 8.2221 DEBT MILLAGE - CURRENT0.5316 0.6003 0.6665 0.6559 0.3907 DEBT MILLAGE - PROPOSED- - - - - ESTIMATED TOTAL MILLAGE7.7216 7.7903 8.6474 8.7565 8.6128 AD VALOREM TAXES52,078,456 46,416,548 46,371,008 47,660,539 47,816,052 Assumptions: (1) Ad Valorem Revenues: a.) Assessed Valuations: FY10 an d FY11 were provided by Palm Beach County. FY12, FY13 and FY14 assumed increases/decreases of (-10%), (1.5%) an d (2%), respectively. b.) M illage economic growth factors for FY11 through FY 14 are as follows: FY11 (0%), FY12 (11%), FY13 (1.5%) and FY14 (1.5%). (2) N on Ad V a l orem R evenues: FY10 an d FY11 re fl ects current pro j ect i ons. FY12 t h roug h FY13 assumes a 2 .5% i ncrease; FY 14 assumes a 3.5% increase. (3) O pera ti ng an d N on O pera ti ng E xpenses exc l u di ng d e bt : FY 10 re fl ec t s curren t pro j ec ti ons. FY 11 th roug h FY 14 assumes increases/decreases as follows: FY11 (-6.7%), FY12 (1%), FY13 (2%) and FY14 (2%). FY 13 and FY14 in the Par ks & Recreation Budget includes $250,000 and $500,000 res pectively, to incorporate the staffing of the Family Community Center. (4) Proposed Non Ad Valorem Debt Service is based on thr ee borrowings: 1.) a principal amount of $7,050,000, a 20 year term, an interest rate of 4% issued in FY12 for the construct ion of a Family Recreation and Fitness Center ($6,00 0,000) and the Veteran's Park Project ($1,050,000) and 2.) a principal amount i f $6,050,000, a 10 year term, and an interest rate o f 4% for the purchase of a Motorolla Radio System ($6,000,000) and finance softwar e ($500,000) and 3.) a principal amount of $640,000, a 5 year term, an interest rate of 5% issued in FY13 for the purchase of VMware Servers. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #9 Capital Improvement Element Existing Pledgeable Revenue Matrix Table SD #9 CI - 13 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #10 Capital Improvement Element Updated Pledgeable Revenue Matrix Table SD #10 LOCAL LICENSES WATER 1/2 CENT GUARANTEED UTILITIES FRANCHISE OPTION AND FINES AND AND SALES TAX ENTITLEMENT (1)TAX (2)TAX (3)GAS TAX PERMITS (5)FORFEITURES (5)TOTAL SEWER FYE 2009 REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR 3,972,093 362,476 8,958,175 5,096,039 1,308,213 3,852,538 575,848 24,125,382 15,109,152 DEBT SERVICE AND COVERAGE REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR 3,177,674 362,476 7,166,540 3,774,844 872,142 2,568,359 383,899 18,305,933 12,590,960 DEBT SERVICE (4)- - REVENUE DEBT CAPACITY 38,500,000 4,000,000 87,000,000 45,500,000 8,200,000 31,000,000 4,500,000 218,700,000 143,000,000 OUTSTANDING DEBT UTILITIES TAX 49,943,195 49,943,195 REVENUE BONDS 4,939,565 450,763 - 6,337,267 1,626,851 4,790,890 716,106 18,861,441 WATER AND SEWER SERIES 50,146,953 UNUSED REVENUE DEBT CAPACITY 33,560,435 3,549,237 37,056,805 39,162,733 6,573,149 26,209,110 3,783,894 149,895,364 92,853,047 FOOTNOTES: (1) This represents the guaranteed entitlement portion of the State Revenue Sharing. (2) Consists of Utilities Taxes on the following utilit ies: electric, metered and bottled gas and the CST. (3) Consists of Franchise taxes on the following utilitie s: electric, and gas. (4) The Revenue Debt Capacity amounts are calculated assumin g the following coverage factors, maturity amounts and average co upons based on current market conditions. (5) Typically used as backup pledges. Revenue Coverage Factor Maturity Average Coupon W/S 1.10 25 years 5.00 1/2 Cent Sales Tax 1.25 25 years 5.00 Guaranteed Entitlement 1.00 25 years 5.00 Utilities Service Tax 1.25 25 years 5.00 Franchise Tax 1.35 25 years 5.00 Local Option Gas Tax 1.50 15 years 5.00 Water and Sewer System 1.20 25 years 5.00 Licenses and Permits 1.50 25 years 5.00 Cigarette Tax 1.75 15 years 5.00 Fines & Forfeitures 1.50 25 years 5.00 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH PLEDGEABLE REVENUE MATRIX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #11 Capital Improvement Element Existing Debt Summary Table SD #11 CI - 14 CI - 15 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #12 Capital Improvement Element Updated Debt Summary Table SD #12 THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DEBT SUMMAR Y Principal as FYE 2007Maximum Annual of 9/30/09 Security Revenues (1)(2)Debt Service (2)Coverage (2) GENERAL FUND: $15,020,000 Utilities Tax Bonds, Series 20023,235,000 Utilities Tax (3)8,958,175 2,592,250 3.46 $24,635,000 Utilities Tax Bonds, Series 200724,635,000 Utilities Tax (3) Sub-total:27,870,000 $10,000,000 Revenue Bonds, Series 20005,260,000 Non Ad valorem Tax Revenues (4)43,492,843 1,955,663 22.24 $9,685,000 Revenue Bonds, Series 20037,320,000 Non Ad valorem Tax Revenues (4) $3,000,000 Revenue Bonds, Series 2008 (LOC)3,000,000 Non Ad valorem Tax Revenues (4) 15,580,000 ENTERPRISE FUNDS: $28,104,475 Water and Sewer5,974,475 Net Revenues of the Combined15,894,186 5,925,898 2.68 Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A and 1993BFacility (5) $15,030,000 Water/Sewer Rev Bonds, 7,695,000 Net Revenues of the Combined Series 1997 Facility (5) $7,000,000 Water and Sewer 6,770,000 Net Revenues of the Combined Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A Facility (5) $2,350,000 Water and Sewer 2,105,000 Net Revenues of the Combined Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006B Facility (5) $9,000,000 Water and Sewer 8,810,000 Net Revenues of the Combined Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2007 Facility (5) Sub-total:31,354,475 Total Revenue Bond Debt:74,804,475 Principal as Maximum Annual of 9/30/09 Security Revenues (1)(2)Debt Service (2)Coverage (2) GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT (6): $15,685,000 G.O. Series 20027,655,000 Full faith and credit of the City (6)n/an /an/a Matures 2013 $14,000,000 G.O. Series 200411,810,000 Full faith and credit of the City (6)n/an/a n/a Matures 2024 $10,000,000 G.O. Series 200510,000,000 Full faith and credit of the City (6)n/an/a n/a Matures 2024 Total General Obligation Debt:29,465,000 Footnotes: (1) Audited amounts. (2) All Bonds are on a parity therefore, the coverage calculati ons are based on the respective combine maximum annual debt service. (3) The Utilities Tax is imposed on each and every purchase in the City of electricity, metered and bottled gas and teleco mmunications services. (4) Non Ad valorem revenues are based on the Gross General Fund Revenue less: Ad Valorem tax Revenue collected, 6.7% of the Unreserved Balance, as well as the highest year of Ut ility Tax debt service. An amount of $350,000 was estimated f or the 2008 Line of Credit. (5) The Net Revenues of the Combined Public Utility incl ude the revenues derived from the operation of the City's Wat er System, exludes connection fees, interest expense, depreciation an d amortization expense. Special assessments and impact charges are not pledged for payment of Debt Service on the Bonds, however, the City may, by subsequent proceedings of the City Commission elect to pledge special assessments and impact charges for the payment of Debt Servi ce. The Combined Public Utility Revenues exclude conne ction fees totalling $235,998. (6) The General Obligation Bonds are obligations of th e City for which its full faith, credit, and taxing power a re irrevocably pledged and and debt service is paid from ad valorem taxes levied on all taxable property located in the City (excluding homeste ad exemptions). Revenues available to pay debt service on General Obligation Bonds are based on the millage rate as approved b y referendum and are equal to the annual debt service requirement of the bo nds. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #13 Lintco D evelopment Existing and Proposed Colored Future Land Use Maps and Lintco Development Overlay District SD #13 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #14 Traffic Impact Analysis for Lintco Development Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. June 2010 SD #14 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DELRAY BEACH, FL Prepared for: Lintco, Inc. Delray Beach, Florida Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. West Palm Beach, Florida 144491000 June 2010 Revised June 2010 CA 00000696 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 561/845-0665 TEL 561/882-0199 FAX Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc Page | i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT TRAFFIC ................................................................................................ 4 Trip Generation .................................................................................................... 4 Traffic Distribution ................................................................................................ 6 Traffic Assignment............................................................................................... 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS .............................................................................. 8 Existing (2009) Conditions ................................................................................... 8 Short-term (2015) Horizon ................................................................................... 8 Long-term (2035) Horizon ................................................................................... 8 EXISTING (2009) CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 9 SHORT-TERM (2015) HORIZON ........................................................................... 11 LONG-TERM (2035) HORIZON ............................................................................. 14 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................... 17 APPENDIX A: PROJECT SITE INFORMATION APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC COUNT DATA APPENDIX C: COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT DATA APPENDIX D: 2035 MODEL VOLUMEs Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc Page | ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Maximum Development Intensities ...................................................... 2 Table 2 Trip Generation – Maximum Intensity ................................................... 5 Table 3 Existing (2009) Daily Traffic Link Analysis ........................................... 10 Table 4 Short Term (2015) Significance Analysis ............................................ 12 Table 5 Short Term (2015) Link Analysis ........................................................ 13 Table 6 Long Term (2035) Daily Traffic Significance Analysis ......................... 15 Table 7 Long Term (2035) Daily Traffic Link Analysis ...................................... 16 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location ........................................................................................ 3 Figure 2 Project Trip Distribution ........................................................................ 7 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 1 INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has been retained to pr epare a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment traffic analysis for the proposed Lintco Commercial development. The project site is located on the north west corner of Linton Boulevard & SW 4 th Avenue in the City of Delray Beach. A recent survey of the project site is provided in Appendix A. Figure 1 illust rates the location of the project site. The parcel control numbers (PCN) for the subject p arcels were obtained from the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser’s Office and are listed below: 12-43-46-20-01-008-0010 12-43-46-20-01-008-0040 12-43-46-20-01-008-0050 12-43-46-20-01-008-0060 12-43-46-20-01-008-0090 12-43-46-20-01-008-0110 12-43-46-20-01-008-0120 12-43-46-20-01-008-0140 12-43-46-20-01-008-0150 12-43-46-20-01-008-0160 12-43-46-20-01-008-0170 12-43-46-20-01-008-0180 The +/-7.08-acre project site is currently vacant and it s future land use is Medium Density Residential which allows for 5-12 dwelling unit s per acre, or a maximum of 85 dwelling units on this site. It is proposed to amend the existing future land use designation to General Commercial with a maximum developm ent intensity of 111,026 square feet (FAR = 0.36) plus 85 dwelling uni ts (12 dwelling units per acre). Table 1 summarizes the existing and proposed futu re land use intensities for the existing and proposed future land use designations. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 2 This analysis was conducted following general existing, short term and long term analysis procedures used to evaluate comprehensive plan a mendments. This report summarizes the findings of the Comprehensive Plan L and Use Amendment traffic analysis. TABLE 1 MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITIES LINTCO COMMERCIAL Existing Future Land Use Medium Density Residential Proposed Future Land Use 12 DU/Acre7.08 85DU © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. K:\WPB_TPTO\1444\144491000 Lintco Site\Excel\[MASTER -Lintco_CPA_Revised.xls]T1-Dev Scenario Acreage Maximum Intensity Maximum Development General Commercial SF 111,026 7.08 0.36 FAR DU 85 7.08 12 DU/Acre Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 4 PROJECT TRAFFIC Project traffic used in this analysis is defined as the v ehicle trips expected to be generated by the project, and the distribution and assig nment of that traffic over the study roadway network. Trip Generation The trip generation calculations are based on the trip g eneration rates published by Palm Beach County and the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE)Trip Generation, 8 th Edition . Table 2 summarizes the trip generation potential for t he maximum development intensities for both the existing future land use (FLU) and proposed FLU. As indicated in Table 2, the existing FLU has the potenti al to generate 595 daily trips, 45 AM peak-hour trips, and 53 PM peak-hour trip s. The proposed FLU has the potential to generate 4,843 new external daily trips, 104 new external AM peak- hour trips, and 499 new external PM peak-hour trips . The net increase in the trip generation potential is 4,248 daily trips, 59 AM peak-h our trips, and 446 PM peak- hour trips. Because the proposed amendment for the su bject site results in a net increase in the trip generation potential of the site, roadway link analyses were conducted for the existing (2009), short-term (2015), a nd long-term (2035) planning horizons. Based on the trip generation potential, t he radius of development influence was determined to be two miles for each analysis scenario. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 5 TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION - MAXIMUM INTENSITY LINTCO COMMERCIAL DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR TRIPSTOTALIN OUTTOTALIN OUT Existing Future Land Use Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre)85 DU 595 45 9 36 53 34 19 Existing FLU External Trips 595 45 9 36 53 34 19 Proposed Future Land Use 111,026 SF 7,217 111 68 43 754 362 392 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre)85 DU 595 45 9 36 53 34 19 Subtotal 7,812 156 77 79 807 396 411 Internal Capture General Commercial (0.36 FAR)0.83%60 5 4 1 5 2 3 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre)10%60 5 1 4 5 3 2 Subtotal 120 10 5 5 10 5 5 Proposed FLU Driveway Trips 7,692 146 72 74 797 391 406 Pass-By Traffic General Commercial (0.36 FAR)39.81%2,849 42 25 17 298 143 155 Proposed FLU New External Trips 4,843 104 47 57 499 248 251 4,248593821446214232 Note: Trip generation was calculated using the fol lowing data: Daily Traffic Generation Apartments [PBC]=T = 7(X) General Commercial [PBC]=Ln(T) = 0.94*Ln(X) + 5.87 AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Apartments [PBC]=T = 0.49(X) + 3.73; (20% in, 80% out) General Commercial [PBC]=T = 1.00 (X); (61% in, 39% out) PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Apartments [PBC]=T = 0.62(X); (65% in, 35% out) General Commercial [PBC]=Ln(T) = 0.67*Ln(X) + 3.47; (48% in, 53% out) Pass-by General Commercial [PBC]=% = 94.49 - 11.61*Ln(X) © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\excel\[master-l intco_cpa_revised.xls]t2-tripgen INTENSITY LAND USE 6/25/2010 Net New External Trips (Proposed-Existing) General Commercial (0.36 FAR) Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 6 Traffic Distribution Traffic distribution is the pairing of trip ends from the subject site with other land uses in the area. These trips were assigned to the sur rounding roadways based upon a review of the roadway network proposed to be in p lace at the time of buildout and its travel time characteristics. The distribution according to cardinal directions is: NORTH-35 percent SOUTH-25 percent EAST-30 percent WEST-10 percent Traffic Assignment The daily and peak-hour trips for the project were assign ed to the surrounding roadway network proposed to be in place for each respecti ve analysis year. Figure 2 illustrates the project traffic assignment to the surrounding roadway network. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 8 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Consistent with comprehensive plan amendment evaluatio n requirements, roadway segment analyses were conducted to address the tr affic conditions for the existing, short-term, and long-term planning horizons . Existing (2009) Conditions This analysis is conducted using the peak season daily volumes published by Palm Beach County and FDOT (see Appendix B). Because the pro ject site is currently vacant, it utilizes the daily trip generation potential o f the maximum development potential of the proposed FLU designation. Short-term (2015) Horizon This analysis is based on the Test 2 standards of the P alm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance (TPSO) and was conducted using the peak- season peak-hour traffic volumes published by Palm Beac h County. Again, because the project site is currently vacant, this ana lysis utilizes the peak-hour trip generation potential of the maximum development potential of the proposed FLU designation. Long-term (2035) Horizon This analysis was conducted using the 2035 model volum es and the net increase in the daily trip generation potential between the existin g and proposed FLU designations. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 9 EXISTING (2009) CONDITIONS As previously discussed, the site is currently vacant. Therefore, the net-increase in daily trip generation potential is 4,843 net new external daily trips. The radius of development influence and the significantly impacted ro adway links were determined based on Policy 3.5-d of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. For this analysis scenario, the radius of developmen t influence for the existing analysis is two miles because the increase in trips is between 4,001 and 8,000 net daily trips. The daily project trips were assigned to the surroundin g roadway network within the study radius. The existing traffic volumes plus the pr oject trips of the proposed future land use were compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Tabl e 3, Linton Boulevard from SW 10 th Avenue to Federal Highway is significantly impacted by the proposed FLU amendment. Therefore, a level of service (LOS) analysis was performed t o evaluate the operating conditions of the significantly impacted r oadways. As indicated in Table 3, all significantly impacted roadways operate ac ceptably at LOS D or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 10 TABLE 3 EXISTING (2009) DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS LINTCO COMMERCIAL EXIST LOS D2009 PEAKPROJECT TRIPS TOTAL PROJECT IMPACT MEETS # OFGEN. SVC.SEASON DAILYDAILYv/c%SIGNIF.LOS D LANESVOLUME VOLUME 1 TRIPS 2 TRAFFIC THRSHLD.STANDARD? Linton Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 6LD 49,20040,7048%38741,0910.840.79%3.00%no- Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,20037,51113%63038,1410.781.28%3.00%no- Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,20037,90530%1,45339,3580.802.95%3.00%no- I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 49,20044,84034%1,64746,4870.943.35%3.00%yesyes 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 49,20038,19142%2,03440,2250.824.13%3.00%yesyes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 49,20038,19153%2,56740,7580.835.22%3.00%yesyes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 4LD 32,70015,58334%1,64717,2300.535.04%3.00%yesyes Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,70015,5839%43616,0190.491.33%3.00%no- SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L24,50015,9721%4816,0200.650.20%3.00%no- SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 2L12,30015,9722%9716,0691.310.79%2.00%no- SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 2L12,30015,9722%9716,0691.310.79%2.00%no- S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L12,30015,9722%9716,0691.310.79%2.00%no- S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 2L12,30015,9722%9716,0691.310.79%2.00%no- SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 2L12,30015,9720%015,9721.300.00%2.00%no- Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L12,30011,2003%14511,3450.921.18%3.00%no- Congress Avenue NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 49,20017,8608%38718,2470.370.79%3.00%no- Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 49,20023,6159%43624,0510.490.89%3.00%no- I-95 Yamato Road to NW 82nd Street 8LX144,300206,3830%0206,3831.430.00%1.00%no- NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX182,600207,4472%97207,5441.140.05%3.00%no- Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX182,600207,4472%97207,5441.140.05%3.00%no- Atlantic Avenue to Woolbright Road 10LX182,600177,7230%0177,7230.970.00%3.00%no- SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L12,30011,2005%24211,4420.931.97%3.00%no- Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L15,40011,9308%38712,3170.802.51%3.00%no- Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L15,40011,9308%38712,3170.802.51%3.00%no- Federal Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 32,70028,89213%63029,5220.901.93%3.00%no- Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 32,70029,53915%72630,2650.932.22%3.00%no- SE 5th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,50011,93812%58112,5190.421.97%3.00%no- SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,50011,93810%48412,4220.421.64%3.00%no- Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,50012,1303%14512,2750.420.49%3.00%no- SE 6th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,50013,28712%58113,8680.471.97%3.00%no- SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,50013,28710%48413,7710.471.64%3.00%no- Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,50013,0183%14513,1630.450.49%3.00%no- Ocean Boulevard South of Linton Boulevard 2L12,30013,2275%24213,4691.101.97%3.00%no- North of Linton Boulevard 2L12,3009,4752%979,5720.780.79%3.00%no- Swinton Avenue SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue 2L12,3009,5606%2919,8510.802.37%3.00%no- Atlantic Avenue to Lake Ida Road 2L12,30010,8742%9710,9710.890.79%3.00%no- Lowson Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 2L12,30015,9720%015,9721.300.00%2.00%no- Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 2L12,30015,9721%4816,0201.300.39%2.00%no- Atlantic Avenue Barwick Road to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,20038,1401%4838,1880.780.10%3.00%no- Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,20043,8811%4843,9290.890.10%3.00%no- I-95 to SW 8th Avenue 4LD 32,70037,3891%4837,4371.140.15%3.00%no- SW 8th Avenue to Swinton Avenue 4LD 32,70022,8141%4822,8620.700.15%3.00%no- Swinton Avenue to U.S. 1 2L12,30013,0720%013,0721.060.00%3.00%no- U.S. 1 to Ocean Boulevard 4L24,50014,9430%014,9430.610.00%3.00%no- Boca Raton Boulevard NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L12,30011,2001%4811,2480.910.39%3.00%no- Note: 1 2009 I-95 AADT obtained from the FDOT Florida Traffic Online website. 2 Daily project trips based on maximum trip generation pote ntial of proposed future land use. K:\WPB_TPTO\1444\144491000 Lintco Site\Excel\[MASTER-Li ntco_CPA_Revised.xls]T3-Exist © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. % ASSIGN- MENT ROADWAY SEGMENT SIGNIF- ICANT? Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 11 SHORT-TERM (2015) HORIZON As previously noted, the site is currently vacant. T herefore, the net-increase in daily trip generation potential is 104 net new external AM peak-h our trips and 499 net new external PM peak-hour trips. For the purposes o f this analysis, the same radius of development influence and significance thres holds from the existing (2009) analysis was utilized. Significance was determin ed in accordance with the Test 2 LOS E service volumes indicated in the Palm Bea ch County TPSO. As indicated in Table 4, Linton Boulevard from Congress Av enue to Federal Highway is projected to be significantly impacted by the proposed dev elopment. The AM and PM peak-hour project trips were assigned to t he surrounding roadway network within the study radius. Background traffic was projected for all significantly impacted roadways by applying a one-p ercent annual growth rate plus committed development trips as indicated by the Palm Beac h County Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) database. Future total volu mes were then compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Table 5, all significantly im pacted roadways operate acceptably at LOS E or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 12 TABLE 4 SHORT TERM (2015) SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS LINTCO COMMERCIAL COMMITED LOS E PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IMPACT # OF GEN. SVC.% LANES VOLUME Linton Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 6LD 4,9208%9 400.81%no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 4,920 13%13651.32%no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 4,920 30%311493.03%yes I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 4,920 34%351693.43%yes 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 4,920 42%442094.25%yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 4,920 53%552645.37%yes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 4LD 3,270 34%351695.17%yes Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 3,2709%9 451.38%no SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L2,4501%1 50.20%no SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 2L1,2402%2 100.81%no SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 2L1,2402%2 100.81%no S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L1,2402%2 100.81%no S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 2L1,2402%2 100.81%no SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 2L1,2400%0 00.00%no Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L1,2403%3 151.21%no Congress Avenue NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 4,9208%9 400.81%no Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 4,9209%9 450.91%no I-95 Yamato Road to NW 82nd Street 8LX 13,4200%0 00.00%no NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX 16,9802%2 100.06%no Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX 16,9802%2 100.06%no Atlantic Avenue to Woolbright Road 10LX 16,9800%0 00.00%no SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L1,2405%5 252.02%no Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L1,5508%9 402.58%no Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L1,5508%9 402.58%no Federal Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 3,270 13%13651.99%no Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 3,270 15%16752.29%no SE 5th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 2,950 12%13602.03%no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 2,950 10%11501.69%no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 2,9503%3 150.51%no SE 6th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 2,950 12%13602.03%no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 2,950 10%11501.69%no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 2,9503%3 150.51%no Ocean Boulevard South of Linton Boulevard 2L1,2405%5 252.02%no North of Linton Boulevard 2L1,2402%2 100.81%no Swinton Avenue SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue 2L1,2406%6 302.42%no Atlantic Avenue to Lake Ida Road 2L1,2402%2 100.81%no Lowson Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 2L1,2400%0 00.00%no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 2L1,2401%1 50.40%no Atlantic Avenue Barwick Road to Congress Avenue 6LD 4,9201%1 50.10%no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 4,9201%1 50.10%no I-95 to SW 8th Avenue 4LD 3,2701%1 50.15%no SW 8th Avenue to Swinton Avenue 4LD 3,2701%1 50.15%no Swinton Avenue to U.S. 1 2L1,2400%0 00.00%no U.S. 1 to Ocean Boulevard 4L2,4500%0 00.00%no Boca Raton Boulevard NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L1,2401%1 50.40%no K:\WPB_TPTO\1444\144491000 Lintco Site\Excel\[MASTER-Li ntco_CPA_Revised.xls]T4-Short © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGN- MENT SIGNIF- ICANT? 6/25/2010 PM AM Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 13 TA B L E 5 SH O R T T E R M ( 2 0 1 5 ) L I N K A N A L Y S I S LI N T C O C O M M E R C I A L CO M M I T E D LO S E P R O J T R I P S 20 0 9 Pr e v a i l i n g A p p l i e d Hi s t o r i c Co m m i t t e d 2 0 1 5 B c k g r n d 2 0 1 5 T o t a l 2 0 1 5 Me e t s # O F GE N . S V C . Tr a f f i c Gr o w t h G r o w t h V o l . G r o w t h Vo l u m e s Vo l u m e Vo l u m e v/ c Te s t 2 L A N E S VO L U M E AM PM Ra t e Ra t e AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM St a n d a r d ? Li n t o n B o u l e v a r d Co n g r e s s A v e n u e t o I - 9 5 6 L D 4, 9 2 0 3 1 1 4 9 2 , 4 2 6 2 , 7 8 6 - 7 . 9 5 % 1 . 0 0 % 1 4 6 1 6 7 1 1 7 2 1 7 2 6 8 9 3 1 7 0 27 2 0 3 3 1 9 0 . 6 7 ye s I- 9 5 t o S W 1 0 t h A v e n u e 6 L D 4, 9 2 0 3 5 1 6 9 2 , 5 9 0 3 , 5 2 6 - 4 . 9 3 % 1 . 0 0 % 1 5 5 2 1 2 2 4 8 3 7 8 2 , 9 9 3 4 , 1 16 3 , 0 2 8 4 , 2 8 5 0 . 8 7 ye s 10 t h A v e n u e S W t o S W 4 t h A v e n u e 6 L D 4, 9 2 0 4 4 2 0 9 2 , 1 1 9 2 , 9 9 5 - 1 . 6 0 % 1 . 0 0 % 1 2 7 1 8 0 2 0 2 3 0 8 2 , 4 4 8 3 , 4 83 2 , 4 9 2 3 , 6 9 2 0 . 7 5 ye s SW 4 t h A v e n u e t o O l d D i x i e H i g h w a y 6 L D 4, 9 2 0 5 5 2 6 4 2 , 1 1 9 2 , 9 9 5 - 1 . 6 0 % 1 . 0 0 % 1 2 7 1 8 0 1 8 9 2 5 9 2 , 4 3 5 3 , 4 34 2 , 4 9 0 3 , 6 9 8 0 . 7 5 ye s Ol d D i x i e H i g h w a y t o F e d e r a l H i g h w a y 4 L D 3, 2 7 0 3 5 1 6 9 1 , 0 0 2 1 , 2 4 7 - 6 . 4 9 % 1 . 0 0 % 6 0 7 5 1 3 1 1 8 7 1 , 1 9 3 1 , 5 0 9 1, 2 2 8 1 , 6 7 8 0 . 5 1 ye s K: \ W P B _ T P T O \ 1 4 4 4 \ 1 4 4 4 9 1 0 0 0 L i n t c o S i t e \ E x c e l \ [ M A S T E R - L i n tc o _ C P A _ R e v i s e d . x l s ] T 5 - T e s t 2 © 2 0 1 0 , K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . RO A D W A Y S E G M E N T PM AM Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 14 LONG-TERM (2035) HORIZON The net-increase in daily trip generation potential betwee n the existing and proposed FLU designations is 4,248 net new external dail y trips. The radius of development influence and the significantly impacted ro adway links were determined based on Policy 3.5-d of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. For this analysis scenario, the radius of developmen t influence for the existing analysis is two miles because the increase in trips is bet ween 4,001 and 8,000 daily trips. Year 2035 model volumes (see Appendix C) were obtained from the Palm Beach County MPO for each of the study roadways within the two-mile radius. Then, the model volumes were adjusted to AADT by applying the model output conversion factor (MOCF). The daily project trips were then assign ed to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius. The future t otal volumes associated with proposed future land use were then compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Table 6, Linton Boulevard from SW 10 th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway is significantly impacted by the proposed FLU amendment. Therefore, a level of service (LOS) analysis was performed t o evaluate the operating conditions of the significantly impacted r oadways. As indicated in Table 7, all significantly impacted roadways are projec ted to operate acceptably at LOS D or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 15 TABLE 6 LONG TERM (2035) DAILY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS LINTCO COMMERCIAL ADOPTED LOS D PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IMPACT # OF GEN. SVC.DAILY%SIGNIF. LANES VOLUME TRIPS 1 THRSHLD. Linton Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 6LD 49,2008%340 0.69%3.00%no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,20013%552 1.12%3.00%no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,20030%1274 2.59%3.00%no I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 49,20034%1444 2.93%3.00%no 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 49,20042%1784 3.63%3.00%yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 49,20053%2251 4.58%3.00%yes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 6LD 49,20034%1444 2.93%3.00%no Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,7009%382 1.17%3.00%no SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L 24,5001%420.17%3.00%no SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 2L 12,3002%850.69%3.00%no SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 2L 12,3002%850.69%3.00%no S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 12,3002%850.69%1.00%no S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 2L 12,3002%850.69%3.00%no SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 2L 12,3000%0 0.00%3.00%no Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L 12,3003%127 1.03%3.00%no Congress Avenue NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 49,2008%340 0.69%3.00%no Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 49,2009%382 0.78%3.00%no I-95 Yamato Road to NW 82nd Street 10LX 182,6000%0 0.00%3.00%no NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX 182,6002%850.05%2.00%no Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX 182,6002%850.05%2.00%no Atlantic Avenue to Woolbright Road 10LX 182,6000%0 0.00%2.00%no SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 12,3005%212 1.72%3.00%no Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L 15,4008%340 2.21%3.00%no Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L 15,4008%340 2.21%3.00%no Federal Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 32,70013%552 1.69%2.00%no Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 32,70015%637 1.95%3.00%no SE 5th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,50012%510 1.73%3.00%no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,50010%425 1.44%3.00%no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,5003%127 0.43%3.00%no SE 6th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,50012%510 1.73%3.00%no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,50010%425 1.44%3.00%no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,5003%127 0.43%3.00%no Ocean Boulevard South of Linton Boulevard 2L 12,3005%212 1.72%3.00%no North of Linton Boulevard 2L 12,3002%850.69%3.00%no Swinton Avenue SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue 2L 12,3006%255 2.07%3.00%no Atlantic Avenue to Lake Ida Road 2L 12,3002%850.69%2.00%no Lowson Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 2L 12,3000%0 0.00%3.00%no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 2L 12,3001%420.34%3.00%no Atlantic Avenue Barwick Road to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,2001%420.09%3.00%no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,2001%420.09%3.00%no I-95 to SW 8th Avenue 4LD 32,7001%420.13%2.00%no SW 8th Avenue to Swinton Avenue 4LD 32,7001%420.13%3.00%no Swinton Avenue to U.S. 1 2L 12,3000%0 0.00%1.00%no U.S. 1 to Ocean Boulevard 4L 24,5000%0 0.00%3.00%no Boca Raton Boulevard NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L 12,3001%420.34%3.00%no Note: 1 Daily project trips based on difference between maximu m trip generation potential of existing and proposed futur e land uses. K:\WPB_TPTO\1444\144491000 Lintco Site\Excel\[MASTER-Lin tco_CPA_Revised.xls]T6-2035 © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGN- MENT SIGNIF- ICANT? Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 16 TA B L E 7 LO N G T E R M ( 2 0 3 5 ) D A I L Y T R A F F I C L I N K A N A L Y S I S LI N T C O C O M M E R C I A L AD O P T E D LO S D PR O J E C T T R I P S PR O J E C T I M P A C T 20 3 5 2 0 3 5 TO T A L ME E T S # O F GE N . S V C . DA I L Y % SI G N I F . MO D E L M O C F B A C K G R O U N D D A I L Y v/ c LO S D L A N E S VO L U M E TR I P S 1 TH R S H L D . VO L U M E AA D T TR A F F I C ST A N D A R D ? Li n t o n B o u l e v a r d 10 t h A v e n u e S W t o S W 4 t h A v e n u e 6 L D 49 , 2 0 0 4 2 % 1 7 8 4 3 . 6 3 % 3 . 0 0 % ye s 50 , 0 0 0 0 . 9 5 4 7 , 5 0 0 4 2 , 5 3 9 0 . 8 6 5 ye s SW 4 t h A v e n u e t o O l d D i x i e H i g h w a y 6 L D 49 , 2 0 0 5 3 % 2 2 5 1 4 . 5 8 % 3 . 0 0 % ye s 45 , 1 0 0 0 . 9 5 4 2 , 8 4 5 4 3 , 0 0 6 0 . 8 7 4 ye s No t e : 1 Da i l y p r o j e c t t r i p s b a s e d o n d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n m a x i m um t r i p g e n e r a t i o n p o t e n t i a l o f e x i s t i n g a n d p r o p o s ed f u t u r e l a n d u s e s . K: \ W P B _ T P T O \ 1 4 4 4 \ 1 4 4 4 9 1 0 0 0 L i n t c o S i t e \ E x c e l \ [ M A S T E R - L i nt c o _ C P A _ R e v i s e d . x l s ] T 7 - 2 0 3 5 © 2 0 1 0 , K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . RO A D W A Y S E G M E N T % A S S I G N - ME N T SI G N I F - IC A N T ? Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\1444\144491000 lintco site\reports\revised comp plan report.doc | Page 17 CONCLUSION The foregoing comprehensive plan traffic analysis has been conducted to evaluate the proposed future land use designation change from the existing medium density residential use to the proposed general commercial use on th e site located on the northwest corner of Linton Boulevard and SW 4 th Avenue in the City of Delray Beach, Florida. Based on the analyses conducted for each of the three planning horizons required for comprehensive plan amendment analyses (existing, short- term, and long-term), each significantly impacted ro adway is projected to operate acceptably. Therefore, based on the analyses within thi s study, the future land use amendment is expected to continue to allow the significant ly impacted roadways to operate acceptably upon buildout of the proposed developm ent site. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #15 Waterford Existing and Proposed Colored Future Land Use Maps and Waterford Development Overlay District SD #15 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #16 Traffic Impact Analysis for Waterford Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. July 20 10 SD #16 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DELRAY BEACH, FL Prepared for: Delint, Inc. Delray Beach, Florida Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. West Palm Beach, Florida July 2010 CA 00000696 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 561/845-0665 TEL 561/882-0199 FAX Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc Page | i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT TRAFFIC ................................................................................................ 3 PROJECT TRAFFIC ................................................................................................ 4 Trip Generation .................................................................................................... 4 Traffic Assignment............................................................................................... 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS .............................................................................. 8 Existing (2010) Conditions ................................................................................... 8 Short-term (2015) Horizon ................................................................................... 8 Long-term (2035) Horizon ................................................................................... 8 EXISTING (2010) CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 9 SHORT-TERM (2015) HORIZON ........................................................................... 12 LONG-TERM (2035) HORIZON ............................................................................. 16 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................... 19 APPENDIX A: PROJECT SITE INFORMATION APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC COUNT DATA APPENDIX C: COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT DATA APPENDIX D: 2035 MODEL VOLUMES Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc Page | ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Maximum Development Intensities ...................................................... 3 Table 2 Trip Generation – Maximum Intensity ................................................... 5 Table 3 Existing (2010) Daily Traffic Link Analysis ........................................... 10 Table 4 Short Term (2015) Significance Analysis ............................................ 13 Table 5 Short Term (2015) Link Analysis ........................................................ 15 Table 6 Long Term (2035) Daily Traffic Significance Analysis ......................... 17 Table 7 Long Term (2035) Daily Traffic Link Analysis ...................................... 18 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location ........................................................................................ 2 Figure 2 Traffic Distribution ................................................................................ 7 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 1 INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has been retained to pr epare a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment traffic analysis for the proposed Waterford development. The project site is located on Alta Meadows L ane approximately 550 feet south of Lindell Boulevard in the City of Delray Beach. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the project site. The parcel control num ber (PCN) for the subject parcel, obtained from the Palm Beach County Property Ap praiser’s Office, is 12-43-46-29-41-000-0020 (see Appendix A). The +/-4.58-acre project site is currently vacant and it s future land use is Transitional (TRN) which allows for 5-12 dwelling un its per acre and neighborhood commercial use at an intensity of 1.0 floor-area ratio (FAR); or a maximum of 55 dwelling units and 199,505 square feet of neighborhood c ommercial use on this site. It is proposed to amend the existing future la nd use designation to General Commercial (GC) with a maximum development intensit y of 236,346 square feet (FAR = 1.32) plus 55 dwelling units (12 dwelling uni ts per acre). Table 1 summarizes the existing and proposed future land use inte nsities for the existing and proposed future land use designations. This analysis was conducted following general existing, short term and long term analysis procedures used to evaluate comprehensive plan a mendments. This report summarizes the findings of the Comprehensive Plan L and Use Amendment traffic analysis. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 3 TABLE 1 MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITIES WATERFORD PARK Existing Future Land Use 12 DU/Acre 4.58 55DU Proposed Future Land Use 12 DU/Acre 4.58 55DU © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MAST ER-Delint_CPA-1.xls]T1-Dev 4.58 199,505 SF Transitional (TRN) General Commercial (GC) SF 263,346 4.58 1.32 FAR Scenario Acreage Maximum Intensity Maximum Development 1 FAR Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 4 PROJECT TRAFFIC Project traffic used in this analysis is defined as the v ehicle trips expected to be generated by the project, and the distribution and assig nment of that traffic over the study roadway network. Trip Generation The trip generation calculations are based on the trip g eneration rates published by Palm Beach County and the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE)Trip Generation, 8 th Edition . Table 2 summarizes the trip generation potential for t he maximum development intensities for both the existing future land use (FLU) and proposed FLU. As indicated in Table 2, the existing FLU has the pote ntial to generate 7,355 daily trips, 160 AM peak-hour trips, and 777 PM peak-hour t rips. The proposed FLU has the potential to generate 9,127 new external daily tr ips, 211 new external AM peak-hour trips, and 973 new external PM peak-hour tr ips. The net increase in the trip generation potential is 1,772 daily trips, 51 AM peak-hour trips, and 196 PM peak-hour trips. Because the proposed amendment for the su bject site results in a net increase in the trip generation potential of the s ite, roadway link analyses were conducted for the existing (2010), short-term (2015), a nd long-term (2035) planning horizons. Based on the trip generation potential, t he radius of development influence was determined to be three miles for the existing and short-term analysis scenarios, and one mile for the long-term analysis scenar io. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 5 TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION - MAXIMUM INTENSITY WATERFORD DAILY AM PEAK HOURPM PEAK HOUR TRIPSTOTALIN OUTTOTALIN OUT Existing Future Land Use - Transitional (TRN) 199,505 SF 10,502 200 122 78 1,117 536 581 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre)55 DU 385 31 6 25 34 22 12 Subtotal 10,887 231 128 103 1,151 558 593 Internal Capture 0.37%39 3 3 1 3 1 2 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre)10%39 3 1 3 3 2 1 Subtotal 78 6 4 4 6 3 3 Existing FLU Driveway Trips 10,809 225 124 99 1,145 555 590 Pass-By Traffic 33.01%3,454 65 39 25 368 177 191 Existing FLU New External Trips 7,355 160 85 74 777 378 399 Proposed Future Land Use - General Commercial (GC) 263,346 SF 12,544 263 160 103 1,345 646 699 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre)55 DU 385 31 6 25 34 22 12 Subtotal 12,929 294 166 128 1,379 668 711 Internal Capture Commercial (1.32 FAR)0.31%39 3 3 1 3 1 2 Multi-Family Residential (12 DU/Acre)10%39 3 1 3 3 2 1 Subtotal 78 6 4 4 6 3 3 Proposed FLU Driveway Trips 12,851 288 162 124 1,373 665 708 Pass-By Traffic Commercial (1.32 FAR)29.78%3,724 77 47 30 400 192 208 Proposed FLU New External Trips 9,127 211 115 94 973 473 500 1,77251302019695101 Note: Trip generation was calculated using the fol lowing data: Daily Traffic Generation Multi-Family Residential (Apartments)[PBC]=T = 7(X) Commercial [PBC]=Ln(T) = 0.94*Ln(X) + 5.87 AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Multi-Family Residential (Apartments)[PBC]=T = 0.49(X) + 3.73; (20% in, 80% out) Commercial [PBC]=T = 1.00 (X); (61% in, 39% out) PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Multi-Family Residential (Apartments)[PBC]=T = 0.62(X); (65% in, 35% out) Commercial [PBC]=Ln(T) = 0.67*Ln(X) + 3.47; (48% in, 53% out) Pass-by Commercial [PBC]=% = 94.49 - 11.61*Ln(X) © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\excel\[master-d elint_cpa-1.xls]t2-tripgen INTENSITY LAND USE 7/1/2010 Commercial (1.0 FAR) Commercial (1.32 FAR) Net New External Trips (Proposed - Existing) Commercial (1.0 FAR) Commercial (1.0 FAR) Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 6 Traffic Distribution Traffic distribution is the pairing of trip ends fro m the subject site with other land uses in the area. These trips were assigned to the surroun ding roadways based upon a review of the roadway network proposed to be in p lace at the time of buildout and its travel time characteristics. The distribution according to cardinal directions is: NORTH-35 percent SOUTH-25 percent EAST-20 percent WEST-20 percent Traffic Assignment The daily and peak-hour trips for the project were assign ed to the surrounding roadway network proposed to be in place for each respecti ve analysis year. Figure 2 illustrates the project traffic assignment to the surrounding roadway network. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 8 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Consistent with comprehensive plan amendment evaluatio n requirements, roadway segment analyses were conducted to address the tr affic conditions for the existing, short-term, and long-term planning horizons . Existing (2010) Conditions This analysis is conducted using the peak season daily volumes published by Palm Beach County and FDOT (see Appendix B). It is impor tant to note that the existing volumes for I-95 are 2009 daily volumes because 2010 vol umes are not yet readily available. Because the project site is currently vaca nt, it utilizes the daily trip generation potential of the maximum development potential of the proposed FLU designation. Short-term (2015) Horizon This analysis is based on the Test 2 standards of the P alm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance (TPSO) and was conducted using the peak- season peak-hour traffic volumes published by Palm Beac h County. Again, because the project site is currently vacant, this ana lysis utilizes the peak-hour trip generation potential of the maximum development potential of the proposed FLU designation. Long-term (2035) Horizon This analysis was conducted using the 2035 model volum es and the net increase in the daily trip generation potential between the existin g and proposed FLU designations. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 9 EXISTING (2010) CONDITIONS As previously discussed, the site is currently vacant. Therefore, the net-increase in daily trip generation potential is 9,127 net new external daily trips. The radius of development influence and the significantly impacted ro adway links were determined based on Policy 3.5-d of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. For this analysis scenario, the radius of developmen t influence for the existing analysis is three miles because the increase in trips is bet ween 8,001 and 12,000 net daily trips. The daily project trips were assigned to the surroundin g roadway network within the study radius. The existing traffic volumes plus the pr oject trips of the proposed future land use were compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Tabl e 3, the following roadway segments are significantly impacted by the proposed FLU amendment: Linton Boulevard from Congress Avenue to Federal Highway Lindell Boulevard from SW 10 th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway SW 10 th Avenue from Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard Old Dixie Highway from Linton Boulevard to SE 10 th Street Federal Highway from NW 76 th Street to Lindell Boulevard Ocean Boulevard North of Linton Boulevard Swinton Avenue from SW 10 th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue NW 2 nd Avenue from NW 76 th Street to Lindell Boulevard Therefore, a level of service (LOS) analysis was performed t o evaluate the operating conditions of the significantly impacted r oadways. As indicated in Table 3, all significantly impacted roadways operate ac ceptably at LOS D or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 10 TABLE 3 EXISTING (2010) DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS WATERFORD EXIST LOS D2010 PEAKPROJECT TRIPS TOTAL PROJECT IMPACT MEETS # OFGEN. SVC.SEASON DAILYDAILYv/c%SIGNIF.LOS D LANESVOLUME VOLUME 1 TRIPS 2 TRAFFIC THRSHLD.STANDARD? Linton Boulevard Jog Road to Sims Road 4LD 32,70028,8372%18329,0200.890.56%3.00%no- Sims Road to S. Military Trail 6LD 49,20027,4953%27427,7690.560.56%3.00%no- S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 6LD 49,20037,4648%73038,1940.781.48%3.00%no- Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,20033,65214%1,27834,9300.712.60%3.00%no- Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,20040,92826%2,37343,3010.884.82%3.00%yes yes I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 49,20046,45630%2,73849,1941.005.57%3.00%yes yes 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 49,20038,78830%2,73841,5260.845.57%3.00%yes yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 49,20038,78830%2,73841,5260.845.57%3.00%yes yes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 4LD 32,70015,87220%1,82517,6970.545.58%3.00%yes yes Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,70015,87210%91316,7850.512.79%3.00%no- SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L24,50015,1391%9115,2300.620.37%3.00%no- SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 2L15,40015,1391%9115,2300.990.59%3.00%no- SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 2L15,40015,1391%9115,2300.990.59%3.00%no- S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L15,40015,1391%9115,2300.990.59%3.00%no- S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 2L15,40015,1391%9115,2300.990.59%3.00%no- SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 2L15,40015,1390%015,1390.980.00%3.00%no- Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L15,4003,80430%2,7386,5420.4217.78%3.00%yes yes Congress Avenue Clint Moore road to NW 82nd Street 6LD 49,20028,3004%36528,6650.580.74%3.00%no- NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 49,20017,7576%54818,3050.371.11%3.00%no- Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 49,20023,2486%54823,7960.481.11%3.00%no- I-95 Yamato Road to NW 82nd Street 8LX144,300206,3830%0206,3831.430.00%1.00%no- NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX182,600207,5322%183207,7151.140.10%3.00%no- Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX182,600207,5322%183207,7151.140.10%3.00%no- Atlantic Avenue to Woolbright Road 10LX182,600177,7230%0177,7230.970.00%3.00%no- SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L15,4003,80460%5,4769,2800.6035.56%3.00%yes yes Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L15,40011,9862%18312,1690.791.19%3.00%no- Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L15,40011,98610%91312,8990.845.93%3.00%yes yes Federal Highway Jeffery Street to NW 76th Street 4LD 32,69824,38210%91325,2950.772.79%3.00%no- NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 4LD 32,69924,38217%1,55225,9340.794.75%3.00%yes yes Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 32,70030,6282%18330,8110.940.56%3.00%no- Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 32,70030,24710%91331,1600.952.79%3.00%no- Note: 1 I-95 AADT values represent 2009 AADT obtained from the FDOT Florida Traffic Online website as 2010 counts w ere not readily available. 2 Daily project trips based on maximum trip generation p otential of proposed future land use. K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MASTE R-Delint_CPA-1.xls]T3-Exist © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. % ASSIGN- MENT ROADWAY SEGMENT SIGNIF- ICANT? 7/1/2010 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 11 TABLE 3 continued EXISTING (2010) DAILY TRAFFIC LINK ANALYSIS WATERFORD EXIST LOS D2010 PEAKPROJECT TRIPS TOTAL PROJECT IMPACT MEETS # OFGEN. SVC.SEASON DAILYDAILYv/c%SIGNIF.LOS D LANESVOLUME VOLUME 1 TRIPS 2 TRAFFIC THRSHLD.STANDARD? SE 5th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,50011,6055%45612,0610.411.55%3.00%no- SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,50011,6053%27411,8790.400.93%3.00%no- Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,50012,4531%9112,5440.430.31%3.00%no- SE 6th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 29,50013,2685%45613,7240.471.55%3.00%no- SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 29,50013,2683%27413,5420.460.93%3.00%no- Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 29,50012,9631%9113,0540.440.31%3.00%no- Ocean Boulevard South of Linton Boulevard 2L15,40012,5732%18312,7560.831.19%3.00%no- North of Linton Boulevard 2L15,4008,9846%548 9,5320.623.56%3.00%yes yes Swinton Avenue SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue 2L15,4009,7576%54810,3050.673.56%3.00%yes yes Atlantic Avenue to Lake Ida Road 2L15,40010,9602%18311,1430.721.19%3.00%no- Lowson Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 2L15,40015,1391%9115,2300.990.59%3.00%no- Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 2L15,40015,1391%9115,2300.990.59%3.00%no- Atlantic Avenue Barwick Road to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,20040,0120%040,0120.810.00%3.00%no- Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,20044,7690%044,7690.910.00%3.00%no- I-95 to SW 8th Avenue 4LD 32,70034,6620%034,6621.060.00%3.00%no- SW 8th Avenue to Swinton Avenue 4LD 32,70023,7800%023,7800.730.00%3.00%no- Swinton Avenue to U.S. 1 2L15,40013,2130%013,2130.860.00%3.00%no- U.S. 1 to Ocean Boulevard 4L24,50015,2670%015,2670.620.00%3.00%no- Boca Raton Blvd/NW 2nd Ave Clint Moore Road to NW 76th Street 2L15,40011,4545%45611,9100.772.96%3.00%no- NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L15,4003,80410%913 4,7170.315.93%3.00%yes yes Clint Moore Road Congress Avenue to Boca Raton Boulevard 4LD 32,70010,6371%9110,7280.330.28%3.00%no- Military Trail Clint Moore Road to Linton Boulevard 6LD 49,20033,4632%18333,6460.680.37%3.00%no- Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 6LD 49,20036,1552%18336,3380.740.37%3.00%no- Note: 1 I-95 AADT values represent 2009 AADT obtained from the FDOT Florida Traffic Online website as 2010 counts w ere not readily available. 2 Daily project trips based on maximum trip generation p otential of proposed future land use. K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MASTER -Delint_CPA-1.xls]T3-Exist © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 7/1/2010 ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGN- MENT SIGNIF- ICANT? Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 12 SHORT-TERM (2015) HORIZON As previously noted, the site is currently vacant. T herefore, the net-increase in daily trip generation potential is 211 net new external AM peak-h our trips and 973 net new external PM peak-hour trips. For the purposes o f this analysis, the same radius of development influence and significance thres holds from the existing (2010) analysis was utilized. Significance was determin ed in accordance with the Test 2 LOS E service volumes indicated in the Palm Bea ch County TPSO. As indicated in Table 4, the following roadway segments ar e projected to be significantly impacted by the proposed development. Linton Boulevard from Congress Avenue to Federal Highway Lindell Boulevard from SW 10 th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway SW 10 th Avenue from Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard Old Dixie Highway from Linton Boulevard to SE 10 th Street Federal Highway from NW 76 th Street to Lindell Boulevard Ocean Boulevard North of Linton Boulevard Swinton Avenue from SW 10 th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue NW 2 nd Avenue from Clint Moore Road to Lindell Boulevard The AM and PM peak-hour project trips were assigned to t he surrounding roadway network within the study radius. Background traffic was projected for all significantly impacted roadways by applying a one-p ercent annual growth rate plus committed development trips as indicated by the Palm Beac h County Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) database. Future total volu mes were then compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Table 5, all significantly im pacted roadways operate acceptably at LOS E or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 13 TABLE 4 SHORT TERM (2015) SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS WATERFORD COMMITED LOS E PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IMPACT # OF GEN. SVC.% LANES VOLUME Linton Boulevard Jog Road to Sims Road 4LD 3,2702%4190.58%no Sims Road to S. Military Trail 6LD 4,9203%6290.59%no S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 6LD 4,9208%17781.59%no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 4,920 14%291362.76%no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 4,920 26%542535.14%yes I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 4,920 30%632925.93%yes 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 4,920 30%632925.93%yes SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 4,920 30%632925.93%yes Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 4LD 3,270 20%421955.96%yes Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 3,270 10%21972.97%no SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L2,4501%2100.41%no SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 4L2,4501%2100.41%no SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 4L2,4501%2100.41%no S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 4L2,4501%2100.41%no S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 4L2,4501%2100.41%no SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 4L2,4500%000.00%no Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L1,550 30%6329218.84%yes Congress Avenue Clint Moore road to NW 82nd Street 6LD 4,9194%9390.79%no NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 4,9206%13581.18%no Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 4,9206%13581.18%no I-95 Yamato Road to NW 82nd Street 8LX 13,4200%000.00%no NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX16,9802%4190.11%no Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX16,9802%4190.11%no Atlantic Avenue to Woolbright Road 10LX16,9800%000.00%no SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L1,550 60%12558437.68%yes Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L1,5502%4191.23%no Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L1,550 10%21976.26%yes Federal Highway Jeffery Street to NW 76th Street 4LD 3,270 10%21972.97%no NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 4LD 3,270 17%361655.05%yes Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 3,2702%4190.58%no Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 3,270 10%21972.97%no K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MAST ER-Delint_CPA-1.xls]T4-Short © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGN- MENT SIGNIF- ICANT?PM AM 7/1/2010 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 14 TABLE 4 continued SHORT TERM (2015) SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS WATERFORD COMMITED LOS E PROJECT TRIPS PROJECT IMPACT # OF GEN. SVC.% LANES VOLUME SE 5th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 2,9505%11491.66%no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 2,9503%6290.98%no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 2,9501%2100.34%no SE 6th Avenue Federal Highway to SE 10th Street 3LO 2,9505%11491.66%no SE 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue 3LO 2,9503%6290.98%no Atlantic Avenue to NE 4th Street 3LO 2,9501%2100.34%no Ocean Boulevard South of Linton Boulevard 2L1,5502%4191.23%no North of Linton Boulevard 2L1,5506%13583.74%yes Swinton Avenue SW 10th Avenue to Atlantic Avenue 2L1,5506%13583.74%yes Atlantic Avenue to Lake Ida Road 2L1,5502%4191.23%no Lowson Boulevard S. Military Trail to Homewood Boulevard 4L2,4501%2100.41%no Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 4L2,4501%2100.41%no Atlantic Avenue Barwick Road to Congress Avenue 6LD 4,9200%000.00%no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 4,9200%000.00%no I-95 to SW 8th Avenue 4LD 3,2700%000.00%no SW 8th Avenue to Swinton Avenue 4LD 3,2700%000.00%no Swinton Avenue to U.S. 1 2L1,5500%000.00%no U.S. 1 to Ocean Boulevard 4L2,4500%000.00%no Boca Raton Blvd/NW 2nd Ave Clint Moore Road to NW 76th Street 2L1,5505%11493.16%yes NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L1,550 10%21976.26%yes Clint Moore Road Congress Avenue to Boca Raton Boulevard 4LD 3,2701%2100.31%no Military Trail Clint Moore Road to Linton Boulevard 6LD 4,9202%4190.39%no Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 6LD 4,9202%4190.39%no K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MAST ER-Delint_CPA-1.xls]T4-Short © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. PM SIGNIF- ICANT? 7/1/2010 ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGN- MENT AM Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 15 TA B L E 5 SH O R T T E R M ( 2 0 1 5 ) L I N K A N A L Y S I S WA T E R F O R D CO M M I T E D L O S E P R O J T R I P S 20 0 9 Pr e v a i l i n g A p p l i e d Hi s t o r i c Co m m i t t e d 2 0 1 5 B c k g r n d 2 0 1 5 T o t a l 2 0 1 5 M e e t s # O F GE N . S V C . Tr a f f i c Gr o w t h G r o w t h V o l . G r o w t h Vo l u m e s Vo l u m e Vo l u m e v/ c Te s t 2 L A N E S V O L U M E AM PM Ra t e Ra t e AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM St a n d a r d ? Li n t o n B o u l e v a r d Co n g r e s s A v e n u e t o I - 9 5 6 L D 4, 9 2 0 5 4 2 5 3 2 , 8 8 2 2 , 9 7 7 - 0 . 3 1 % 1 . 0 0 % 1 4 4 1 4 9 1 1 7 2 1 7 3 1 4 3 3 3 4 3 31 9 7 3 5 9 6 0 . 7 3 y e s I - 9 5 t o S W 1 0 t h A v e n u e 6 L D 4, 9 2 0 6 3 2 9 2 2 , 9 4 1 3 , 5 4 0 - 0 . 1 0 % 1 . 0 0 % 1 4 7 1 7 7 2 4 8 3 7 8 3 3 3 6 4 0 9 5 33 9 9 4 3 8 7 0 . 8 9 y e s 10 t h A v e n u e S W t o S W 4 t h A v e n u e 6 L D 4, 9 2 0 6 3 2 9 2 2 , 3 4 7 2 , 9 8 5 - 1 . 3 6 % 1 . 0 0 % 1 1 7 1 4 9 1 9 9 3 0 6 2 6 6 3 3 4 4 0 27 2 6 3 7 3 2 0 . 7 6 y e s SW 4 t h A v e n u e t o O l d D i x i e H i g h w a y 6 L D 4, 9 2 0 6 3 2 9 2 2 , 3 4 7 2 , 9 8 5 - 1 . 3 6 % 1 . 0 0 % 1 1 7 1 4 9 1 8 6 2 5 7 2 6 5 0 3 3 9 1 27 1 3 3 6 8 3 0 . 7 5 y e s Ol d D i x i e H i g h w a y t o F e d e r a l H i g h w a y 4 L D 3, 2 7 0 4 2 1 9 5 8 9 5 1 , 3 8 1 - 3 . 7 0 % 1 . 0 0 % 4 5 6 9 1 3 0 1 8 6 1 0 7 0 1 6 3 6 1 1 1 2 18 3 1 0 . 5 6 y e s Li n d e l l B o u l e v a r d SW 1 0 t h A v e n u e t o S . D i x i e H i g h w a y 2L 1 , 5 5 0 6 3 2 9 2 2 8 6 3 6 7 - 5 . 7 9 % 1 . 0 0 % 1 4 1 8 81 10 1 3 8 1 4 8 6 4 4 4 7 7 8 0 . 5 0 y e s SW 1 0 t h A v e n u e Li n d e l l B o u l e v a r d t o L i n t o n B o u l e v a r d 2L 1 , 5 5 0 1 2 5 5 8 4 2 8 6 3 6 7 - 5 . 7 9 % 1 . 0 0 % 1 4 1 8 81 10 1 3 8 1 4 8 6 5 0 6 1 0 7 0 0 . 6 9 y e s Ol d D i x i e H i g h w a y Li n t o n B o u l e v a r d t o S E 1 0 t h S t r e e t 2L 1 , 5 5 0 2 1 9 7 9 3 2 1 , 0 5 4 - 0 . 7 4 % 1 . 0 0 % 4 7 5 3 26 43 1 0 0 5 1 1 5 0 1 0 2 6 1 2 4 7 0 . 8 0 y e s Fe d e r a l H i g h w a y NW 7 6 t h S t r e e t t o L i n d e l l B o u l e v a r d 4 L D 3, 2 7 0 3 6 1 6 5 1 , 8 0 6 2 , 1 8 0 - 4 . 8 2 % 1 . 0 0 % 9 0 1 0 9 1 5 3 2 2 0 2 0 4 9 2 5 0 9 2 08 5 2 6 7 4 0 . 8 2 y e s O c e a n B o u l e v a r d No r t h o f L i n t o n B o u l e v a r d 2L 1 , 5 5 0 1 3 5 8 5 2 8 7 4 2 - 7 . 6 0 % 1 . 0 0 % 2 6 3 7 6 1 4 5 6 0 7 9 3 5 7 3 8 5 1 0 . 5 5 y e s Sw i n t o n A v e n u e SW 1 0 t h A v e n u e t o A t l a n t i c A v e n u e 2L 1 , 5 5 0 1 3 5 8 6 2 5 7 9 6 0 . 0 2 % 1 . 0 0 % 3 1 4 0 69 10 6 7 2 5 9 4 2 7 3 8 1 0 0 0 0 . 6 5 y e s Bo c a R a t o n B l v d / N W 2 n d A v e Cl i n t M o o r e R o a d t o N W 7 6 t h S t r e e t 2L 1 , 5 5 0 1 1 4 9 9 9 8 1 , 0 6 0 - 4 . 2 1 % 1 . 0 0 % 5 0 5 3 81 10 1 1 1 2 9 1 2 1 4 1 1 4 0 1 2 6 3 0 . 8 1 y e s NW 7 6 t h S t r e e t t o L i n d e l l B o u l e v a r d 2L 1 , 5 5 0 2 1 9 7 2 9 0 4 0 0 - 5 . 7 9 % 1 . 0 0 % 1 5 2 0 15 26 3 2 0 4 4 6 3 4 1 5 4 3 0 . 3 5 y e s K: \ W P B _ T P T O \ 8 5 2 9 4 \ a m b \ 2 0 1 0 \ D e l i n t P r o p e r t y \ E x c e l \ [ M A S T E R- D e l i n t _ C P A - 1 . x l s ] T 5 - T e s t 2 © 2 0 1 0 , K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . RO A D W A Y S E G M E N T 7/ 1 / 2 0 1 0 PM AM Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 16 LONG-TERM (2035) HORIZON The net-increase in daily trip generation potential betwee n the existing and proposed FLU designations is 1,772 net new external dail y trips. The radius of development influence and the significantly impacted ro adway links were determined based on Policy 3.5-d of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. For this analysis scenario, the radius of developmen t influence for the existing analysis is one mile because the increase in trips is between 1,001 and 4,000 daily trips. Year 2035 model volumes (see Appendix C) were obtained from the Palm Beach County MPO for each of the study roadways within the on e-mile radius. Then, the model volumes were adjusted to AADT by applying the model output conversion factor (MOCF). The daily project trips were then assign ed to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius. The future t otal volumes associated with proposed future land use were then compared to the generalized service volumes at each roadway’s adopted level of service. As indicated in Table 6, the following roadway segments are significantly impacted by the propo sed FLU amendment. Lindell Boulevard from SW 10 th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway SW 10 th Avenue from Lindell Avenue to Linton Boulevard Therefore, a level of service (LOS) analysis was performed t o evaluate the operating conditions of the significantly impacted r oadways. As indicated in Table 7, all significantly impacted roadways are projec ted to operate acceptably at LOS D or better. Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 17 TABLE 6 LONG TERM (2035) DAILY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS WATERFORD ADOPTED LOS D PROJECT TRIPSPROJECT IMPACT # OF GEN. SVC.DAILY%SIGNIF. LANES VOLUME TRIPS 1 THRSHLD. Linton Boulevard Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 6LD 49,200 14%2480.50%3.00%no Congress Avenue to I-95 6LD 49,200 26%4610.94%3.00%no I-95 to SW 10th Avenue 6LD 49,200 30%5321.08%3.00%no 10th Avenue SW to SW 4th Avenue 6LD 49,200 30%5321.08%3.00%no SW 4th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway 6LD 49,200 30%5321.08%3.00%no Old Dixie Highway to Federal Highway 6LD 49,200 20%3540.72%3.00%no Federal Highway to S. Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,700 10%1770.54%3.00%no SW 10th Street Congress Avenue to SW 10th Avenue 4L24,500 1%180.07%3.00%no SW 10th Avenue to SW 4th Avenue 4L15,400 1%180.12%3.00%no SW 4th Avenue to S. Swinton Avenue 4L15,400 1%180.12%3.00%no S. Swinton Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 4L15,400 1%180.12%3.00%no S. Dixie Highway to SE 5th Avenue 4L15,400 1%180.12%3.00%no SE 5th Avenue to SE 6th Avenue 4L15,400 0%00.00%3.00%no Lindell Boulevard SW 10th Avenue to S. Dixie Highway 2L15,400 30%5323.45%3.00%yes Congress Avenue NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 6LD 49,200 6%1060.22%3.00%no Linton Boulevard to Lowson Boulevard 6LD 49,200 6%1060.22%3.00%no I-95 NW 82nd Street to Linton Boulevard 10LX 182,6002%350.02%2.00%no Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue 10LX 182,6002%350.02%2.00%no SW 10th Avenue Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L15,400 60%10636.90%3.00%yes Old Dixie Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 2L15,400 2%350.23%3.00%no Linton Boulevard to SE 10th Street 2L15,400 10%1771.15%3.00%no Federal Highway Lindell Boulevard to Linton Boulevard 4LD 32,700 2%350.11%2.00%no Linton Boulevard to SE 5th Avenue 4LD 32,700 10%1770.54%3.00%no Lowson Boulevard Homewood Boulevard to Congress Avenue 4L15,400 1%180.12%3.00%no Boca Raton Boulevard NW 76th Street to Lindell Boulevard 2L15,400 10%1771.15%3.00%no Note: 1 Daily project trips based on difference between maxi mum trip generation potential of existing and propo sed future land uses. K:\WPB_TPTO\85294\amb\2010\Delint Property\Excel\[MASTER -Delint_CPA-1.xls]T6-2035 © 2010, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ROADWAY SEGMENT % ASSIGN- MENT SIGNIF- ICANT? 7/1/2010 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 18 TA B L E 7 LO N G T E R M ( 2 0 3 5 ) D A I L Y T R A F F I C L I N K A N A L Y S I S WA T E R F O R D AD O P T E D LO S D PR O J E C T T R I P S PR O J E C T I M P A C T 20 3 5 2 0 3 5 TO T A L ME E T S # O F GE N . S V C . DA I L Y % SI G N I F . MO D E L M O C F B A C K G R O U N D D A I L Y v/ c LO S D L A N E S VO L U M E TR I P S 1 TH R S H L D . VO L U M E AA D T TR A F F I C ST A N D A R D ? Li n d e l l B o u l e v a r d SW 1 0 t h A v e n u e t o S . D i x i e H i g h w a y 2L 15 , 4 0 0 3 0 % 5 3 2 3 . 4 5 % 3. 0 0 % ye s 5, 7 0 0 0. 9 5 5, 4 1 5 5, 9 4 7 0 . 3 8 6 ye s SW 1 0 t h A v e n u e Li n d e l l B o u l e v a r d t o L i n t o n B o u l e v a r d 2L 15 , 4 0 0 6 0 % 1 0 6 3 6 . 9 0 % 3. 0 0 % ye s 10 , 8 0 0 0 . 9 5 10 , 2 6 0 11 , 3 2 3 0 . 7 3 5 ye s 1 Da i l y p r o j e c t t r i p s b a s e d o n d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n m a x i m u m t r i p g e n e r a t i o n p o t e n t i a l o f e x i s t i n g a n d p r o p o s e d fu t u r e l a n d u s e s . K: \ W P B _ T P T O \ 8 5 2 9 4 \ a m b \ 2 0 1 0 \ D e l i n t P r o p e r t y \ E x c e l \ [ M A S T E R - D e l i n t _ C P A - 1 . x l s ] T 7 - 2 0 3 5 © 2 0 1 0 , K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . RO A D W A Y S E G M E N T % A S S I G N - ME N T SI G N I F - IC A N T ? 7/ 1 / 2 0 1 0 Traffic Impact Analysis k:\wpb_tpto\85294\amb\2010\delint property\report\comp plan rep ort.doc | Page 19 CONCLUSION The foregoing comprehensive plan traffic analysis has been conducted to evaluate the proposed future land use designation change from the e xisting transitional future land use to the proposed general commercial fut ure land use on the site located on Alta Meadows Lane approximately 550 feet sout h of Lindell Boulevard in the City of Delray Beach, Florida. Based on the analys es conducted for each of the three planning horizons required for comprehensive plan amendment analyses (existing, short-term, and long-term), each signific antly impacted roadway is projected to operate acceptably. Therefore, based on the ana lyses within this study, the future land use amendment is expected to co ntinue to allow the significantly impacted roadways to operate acceptably u pon buildout of the proposed development site. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #17 Marketplace of Delray Annexation, FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Staff Repor t SD #17 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of making a rec ommendation to the City Commission on a City initiated Voluntary Annexation, Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Am endment from Palm Beach County CH -8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential density of 8 units per acre) to City GC (General Commercial), and rezoning from County GC (General Commercial) to City PC (Planned Commercial) for an approximate 30.26 acre site for “The Market p lace of D elray ”, an existing shopping Center with outparcels. The subject property is located at northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail (see lo cation map and table attached). Pursuant to Land Developme nt Regulations (LDR) Section 2.2.2(E)(6), t he Local Planning Agency (Planning & Zoning Board) shall rev iew and make a recommendation to the City Commission with respect to annexation, FLUM amendme nt, and Rezoning of any property within the City. BACKGROUND /PROJECT DESCRIPTION The property under consideration is a 30.26 shoppin g center with several outparcels which was construc ted between 1980 and 1986. On April 8, 1980, a water se rvice agreement between Federal Plaza Ltd (then owners of the subject property) and the City of Del ray Beach was executed for approximately 28 acres o f the subject p roperty . The 1980 Water Service Agreement did not include the voluntary annexation clause nor did it include some of the outparcels. In August of 2000, the Market p lace of Delray, Inc., requested seven additional wa ter connections for newly converted retail space. As there was an urgency to open the new businesses, the City Commission approved a temporary water service agreement on Nov ember 7, 2000, to allow the applicant to provide service to the new tenants, with the understanding that a new water service agr eement would be executed. On June 18, 2002, the Water Service Agreement was m odified to include the entire shopping center and a ll outparcels. The water service agreement included th e consent for future a nnexation and assessment of a storm water assessment fee. The agreement states , “unless the customer agrees to an earlier date, the City agrees not to approve an annexation ordinance under this agreement until January 15, 2010 .” The current property owner has been notified of the proposed annexation procee dings. The property is bordered to the north by the LWDD L -33 Canal and the Fountains of Delray Apartments and Fountain Center; to the east by Delray Square Shopping Center; to the west by Carnival Flea Market and High Point of Delray West ; and to the south by Pines West Plaza. The subject p roperty is located within the “Four Corners” overlay district at the intersection of West Atlant ic Avenue and Military Trail. The subject property is under the jurisd iction of Palm Beach County , but in a designated annexation area for the City of Delray Beach. The property is locat ed in the City's Planning Area, known as Annexation Area “D”, as noted in Future Land Use Element Policy B -3.5 of the Comprehensive Plan. Th e City ’s advisory FLUM designation for the property is GC (General Commercial). The pr oposed FLUM amendment to implement the advisory designation and annexation (pursuant to the referenced Agreemen t for Water Service) with initial zoning of PC (Planned Commercial) were initiated by the City Commission o n July 6, 2010 , and are now before the Board for action. FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT ANALYSIS Current Land Use Designation: The current land use map designation for the Market place of Delray is County CH -8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential density of 8 units per acre). The current City “advisory” designation is GC (General Commercial). The City’s FLUM designation as initially contained on the City’s Future Land Use Map adopted by Ordinan ce 82 -89 in November 1989, (and as formally amended subsequently) are deemed to be advisory until an of ficial Future Land Use Map Amendment is processed. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 2 Requested Land Use Designation: The requested Future Land Use Map Designation is GC (General Commerci al). CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Designated Annexation Area : The properties to be annexed are located within des ignated Annexation Area “D" on the west side of Military Trail , north of Atlantic Avenue. Annexation of the territ ory is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy B -3.5, which calls for annexation of eligible propert ies through voluntary annexations as the opportunities arise. Land Use Analysis: Consistency Between the City and County Land Use Designations: The proposed City Future Land Use Map Designation for the property is GC (Ge neral Commercial). The existing County Future Land Use Map Designation for the property is CH -8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential of 8 units per acre). The Ci ty’s GC Future Land Use Map Designation is consistent with the existing County CH -8 designation in that the city’s description of the General Commercial designation states , “This designation is applied to land which is, or s hould be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services”. It is further stated , “Residential uses may comprise up to 15% of the total floor area of the General Commerci al Land Use designation. Residential uses are permitted either in conjunction with a commerci al use, or as a standalone use s ubject to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is li mited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre . Areas with the General Commercial designation, lo cated within a workforce housing overlay district, may also exceed 12 units per acre up to a maximum of 30 units per acre within the Four Corners Overlay District and 18 units per acre within the infill workforce housing area, by obtaining density bonuses through the provision of workforce housing units”. Similarly to the County’s C H-8 designation, the City’s GC designation allows for mixed -use development with general commercial and residential uses. Adjacent Future Land Use Map Designations, Zoning Designations and Land Uses: The following zoning designations and uses abut the subject properties: FLUM Designation Zoning District Use North: MD (Medium Density Residential 5 -12 du/ac) and TRN (Transitional) RM (Medium Density Residential) and NC (Neighborhood Commercial) Fountains at Delray Beach Apartments Fountain Center South: GC (General Commercial) PC (Planned Commercial) Pines West Plaza East: GC (General Commercial) PC (Planned Commercial) Delray Square Plaza West: CH -8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential density of 8 units per acre) G C (General Commercial) High Point of Delray West and Carnival Flea Market Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 3 The proposed FLUM designation and rezoning of the subject properties will maintain co nsistency and compatibility with the adjacent development pattern s. Allowable Land Uses: Under the proposed General Commercial (GC) Land Use Map designation, commercial zoning districts which accommodate shopping center developments are allowed. The proposed zoning of PC is consistent with the proposed GC FLUM designation and compatible with t he adjacent developments to the west, south and east. REQUIRED FI N DINGS: LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CHAPTER 3: Pursuant to LDR Section 3.1.1, prior to approval of Land Use applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the off icial record. This may be achieved through informa tion on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority t o approve or deny the development applicati on. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map (F LUM), Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Developme nt Regulations. Future Land Use Map: The resulting use of land or structures must be all owed in the zoning dis trict within which the land is situated and said zo ning must be consistent with the applicable land use designation as shown on the Future Land Us e Map. P ursuant to Land Development Regulations Section 3.1 .1 (A) (Future Land Use Map), all land uses and resulting structures must be allowed in the z oning district within which the land is situated, a nd said zoning must be consistent with the land use designa tion as shown on the Future Land Use Map. The proposed Planned Commercial (GC) zoning district is con sistent with the proposed GC (General Commercial ) FLUM designation. Retail and other commercial act ivities established on large sites in a well planned, functional, and aesthetically pleasin g manner are allowed in the Planned Commercial (P C) zoning distric t as a permitted use . Based on the above, positive findings can be made w ith respect to FLUM consistency. Concurrency : Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standards. Provision of Services: When annexation of property occurs, services are to be provided in a manner which is consistent with services provided to other similar properties already in the City (Future Lan d Use Element Policy B -3.1). The proposal involves amending the FLUM designation from Palm Beach County CH -8 (Commercial High with an underlying high Residentia l, 8 du/ac) to City GC (General Commercial) and rezoning from County GC (General Commercial) to City P C (Planned Commercial) for a n approximately 30.26 acres s ite for The Market Place of Delray, an existing shopping Ce nter with outparcels . Since the City’s advisory FLUM designation of GC, a s shown on the existing Future Land Use Map, has been in place since 1990, this amendment is jus t an implementation of current comprehensive plan policies and there is no change in development potential. However, a general description of Concurrency findings with respect to Police, Solid Waste, Traff ic and Water and Sewer are discussed below: Police : This propert y is currently serviced by the Palm Beach County Sheriff 's Office, located at 345 South Congress, which serves the South County area. The property is within Sheriff Patrol zone 7. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 4 Zone 7 is bordered by Jog Road on the west, the Delray Beach City Limits on the east, and Atlantic Avenue on the north and Clint Moore Road to the sou th. One officer is assigned to a particular zone during a shift (three shifts per day). The City of Delray Beach’s Police Department has 14 cars per shift patrolling a 15 square mile area during the day and 15 cars during the night; and as a result , response time will be significantly improved upon annexation. Annexation will not require additional manpower since the police currently patrol in close proximit y to these parcels . Fire and Emergency Services: The annexation of this property will not require ad ditional manpower. The municipal area is served by Fire Station No. 4 (Barwick Road and Lake Ida Road). With anne xation, the property will receive an improved respo nse time from the current 5.5 minutes of the County’s Fire Department (Fire Station #42 located on Hagen Ranch Road close to the Turnpike) to 2.5 minutes for the City’s Fire Department (Fire Statio n #4 located at Barwick and Lake Ida Road). Water: Municipal water service is available via connection to a 12” water main located along Military Trail and West Atlantic Avenue . Ten fire hydrant s are spread out through the property including one fire hydrant the east side of Military and another one t he south side of West Atlantic Avenue. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that treatment capacity is available at the City’s Water Treatment P lant at build -out. Sewer: Sew er service is available via an 8” sew er main located along the perimeter of the site and a lift station located on the north side of the Lake Worth District Drainage (LWDD) canal . The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that treatment capacity is available at the South Centra l County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build -out. Streets: The subject propert ies can be access ed via West Atlantic Avenue and from Military Trail . West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail are under the jurisdiction of Palm Beach County and t he jurisdictional responsibility and the associated maintenance of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail will not change upon annexation. Based upon the above a positive finding with respec t to t raffic concurrency can be made. Solid Waste: The Marketplace of Delray shopping plaza has nine retail/commercial establishments including eight outside parcels and one large internal parcel. Therefore, the subje ct property will have a relatively important impact on this level of service standard. The solid waste authority has indicated they have sufficient capacity to service this area. The service provider will not change with annexation, as described later in this report. Consistency : The requested designation is consistent with the go als, objectives and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. The following applicable Comprehensive Plan objective and policies are noted : Future Land Use Element Policy A -1.7: Amendments to the FLUM must be based upon the findings listed below, and must be supported by data and analysis that demonstrate compliance with these findings: Demonstrated Need -- That there is a need for the requested land use. Th e need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic tr ends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designat ions of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, annexatio n into the municipal boundaries, or similar circumstances. The need must be supported by data and analysis verifying the changing demographics or other circumstances. This requirem ent shall not apply to requests for the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 5 FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space; nor shall it apply to FLUM changes associated with annexations when the City’s advisory FLUM designation is being applied, or when the requested designation is of a similar intensity to the advisory designation. However, the findings described in the remainder of this policy must be addressed with all FLUM amendments. The proposal is associated with the annexation of an unincorporated propert y and requires changing the FLUM designation from County to City. Since the City’s advisory FLUM designation is being being applied to the property in association with the annexation , the demonstrated need does not apply. Future Land Use Element Objective A -1: Property shall be developed or redeveloped, in a manner so that the future use, intensity and density are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; encourage affordable goods and services; are complementary to and compatible wi th adjacent land uses; and fulfill remaining land use needs. The subject property does not have any unique envir onmental characteristics that would require mitigation measures. The current County FLUM design ation is CH -8 (Commercial High with an underlying High Residential, 8 units/acre) and the proposed City designation is GC (General Commercial). It is noted that the proposed PC (Plan ned Commercial) zoning designation would allow commercial/retail developments as does the county z oning designati on of CH -8 (Commercial High with an underlying High Residential, 8 units/acre). It i s also noted that the proposed GC (General Commercial) FLUM designation is compatible with the existing developments to the south, Delray Commons and Points West Shopping P laza; to the east, Hess Gas Station, Walgreens, and Delray Square Shopping Plaza; and to the west, Carnival Flea Market of Delray. It is also compatible existing F ountains at Delray Beach Apartment complex and the small ret ail center to the north. Compat ibility -- The requested designation will be compatible with t he existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. As noted above , compatibility has been identified under Future Land Use Element Objective A -1. Compliance -- Development under the requested designation will co mply with the provisions and requirements of the Land Development Regulation s. The current developme nt for The Marketplace of Delray was processed both through the County and the City for consistency with the LDRs as part of t he water service agreement process . Any future development of the subject propert y will be submitted to the site plan review process and will be reviewed for compliance with the LDR s. At this time , no issues have been identified which would prohibit compliance with the requirements of the proposed PC (Planned Commercial) z oning district for the Marketplace of Delray development . ANNEXATION ANALYSIS Florida Statues Governing Voluntary Annexations : Pursuant to the Florida Statutes 171.044 “the owner or owners of real properties in an unincorporated area of the County, which is contiguous to a municipalit y and reasonably compact may petition the governing body of said municipality that said property be ann exed to the municip ality”. Pursuant to F. S. 171.044 (5) “land shall not be annexed through voluntary annexa tion when such annexation results in the creation o f enclaves”. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 6 As noted throughout the report , the Marketplace Development is a voluntary annexation which is consented to through an exec uted water service agreement . Chapter 171.046, Florida Statutes (2004), provides for annexation of certain enclaves by entering into an Interlocal Agreement between the Municipality and t he County having jurisdiction over such encla ve; and limits annexation by Interlocal Agreement t o enclaves of ten (10) acres or less in size. Financia l Impa cts : Effect upon Annexed Propert y: t he following table depicts the current assessed value and total (County) taxes for the subject propert y: For the 200 9 tax year , the subject property had an assessed value of $2 5,888 ,048.00 . With the change from County to City jurisdiction, the following tax es and rates will be affected: THE MARKETPLACE OF DELRAY ADVALOREM COUNTYCOUNTY WITH CITYCITY TAXESTAXES MILLAGE ANNEXATION TAXES MILLAGE Fire/Rescue MSTU 89,523.463.45810005 DELETE 0.000.000000 Palm Beach County Lib.12,866.360.49700001 DELETE 0.000.000000 Palm Beach Co.Lib.Debt 1,418.670.05480019 DELETE 0.000.000000 Florida Inland Navegation 893.130.03449970893.130.034500 Health Care District 29,644.411.1451002429,644.411.145100 Palm Beach County 112,457.674.34399959112,457.674.344000 Palm Beach County Debt 5,628.060.217399945,628.060.217400 Children Service Council 17,857.570.68979979 17,857.570.689800 Public Schools Loc.Board 64,668.352.4980000064,668.352.49800000 Public Schools State Law 141,995.935.48500000141,995.935.48500000 SFWMD District 13,839.740.5345996013,839.740.534600 SFWMD Everglades Const.2,314.390.089399942,314.390.089400 City of Delray Beach Added (City)186,135.077.190000 City of Delray Beach DebtAdded (City)13,762.090.531600 SUB-TOTAL $493,10819.0477Difference*$589,19622.7594 3.7117 THE MARKETPLACE OF DELRAY PCN TAXABLE VALUE 2009 PBC ADVAL. TAXES PBC NON- ADVAL. TAXES TOTAL PBC TAXES PBC COUNT Y MILL. ADVAL. CITY OF DELRAY TAXES NON- ADVAL. CITY OF DELRAY TAXES CITY OF DELRAY BEACH MILLAGE TOTAL CITY OF DELRAY TAXES DIFFERENCE 42461400000501017,000,000.0 323,811.0097,355.00421,166.00 19.0477 386,909.7818,70122.7594405,610.42-15,555.58 4246140000055001,277,112.0 24,326.004,256.0028,582.00 19.0477 29,066.3018,70122.759447,766.9419,184.94 4246140000055101,113,658.0 21,213.00911.0022,124.00 19.0477 25,346.1918,70122.759444,046.8321,922.83 4246140000055201,522,447.0 28,999.00910.0029,909.00 19.0477 34,649.9818,70122.759453,350.6223,441.62 4246140000055301,064,524.0 20,277.005,846.0026,123.00 19.0477 24,227.9318,70122.759442,928.5716,805.57 4246140000055401,217,770.0 23,196.00873.0024,069.00 19.0477 27,715.7118,70122.759446,416.3522,347.35 4246140000055501,127,665.0 21,479.00262.0021,741.00 19.0477 25,664.9818,70122.759444,365.6222,624.62 424614000005560719,218.0 13,699.004,210.0017,909.00 19.0477 16,368.9718,70122.759435,069.6117,160.61 424614000005570845,654.0 16,108.004,689.0020,797.00 19.0477 19,246.5818,70122.759437,947.2217,150.22 SUB-TOTAL 25,888,048.0 $493,108.00 $119,312.00 $612,420.00 19.0477 $589,196.41 168,306 22.7594 $757,502.16 $145,082.16 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 7 * Total tax millage in the county is 19.0477 mills . If annexed into the City, the total millage would be 22.7594 mills , a difference of 3.7117 mills. The current yearly ad valorem and non ad valorem taxes are $612,420 . W ith annexation , the yearly ad valorem taxes will in crease to $757,502.16 (612,420+145,082.16 =757,502.16 ); a tax difference of $145 ,082.16 . In addition to property taxes, the following Non Ad Valorem fiscal responsibility will apply: Delray Beach Storm Water Utility – This assessment is based upon the percentage of imp ervious area of the structures, buildings, parking areas, etc. If the property is developed as a multiple family c omplex or is subdivided for residential purposes, an assessme nt of $54.00 per unit would be applied. A 25% discount from the assessment is available since the property is within the Lake Worth Drainage Distric t. An additional 25% may be available if drainage is r etained on site. Solid Waste Authority – This annexatio n area is serviced under a contract with Waste Management . The City’s solid waste removal contract is also through Waste Management. Pursuant to Florida Statu te 171.062 (4)(a) “ if a party has an exclusive franch ise which is in effect for at least six months prio r to the initiation of an annexation, the franchise may cont inue to provide such services to the annexed area f or five years or the remainder of the franchise term w hichever is shorter”. Thus, the waste service provi der will not change with annexati on. T he Marketplace of Delray property is currently prov iding a solid waste disposal fee to the County. After annexation, an assessment fee of approximately $4,477 per year for this service will be paid to the City . SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON THE PROPERTY FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS AD VALOREM TAXES 2010 +$145,082.16 City Mills.PB County Mills 22.75940 -19.04770 =3.7117 NON AD VALOREM TAXES 2010 Stormwater Assessment $14,223.02 Solid Waste Collection $4,477.62 WATER & SEWER UTILITY FEES $0.00 ANNUAL FINANCIAL IMPACT:+$163,782.80 SERVICE CONSIDERATIONS Fire Response +Faster response from an estimated 5.5 minutes (County) to 2.5 minutes (City). Emergency Medical +Faster response from an estimated 5.5 Services (EMS)minutes (County) to 2.5 minutes (City). Police +Better response based upon more officers in field; 14 patroll cars per shift daytime, 15 patroll cars during the night. Code Enforcement +Pro-active vs reactive opportunity to work with property owners. Fiscal Impacts : As shown on the above table, annexation into the Ci ty, would generate an additional $1 45 ,082 .16 in ad valorem taxes per year from this property . With future re development, additional revenues will be realized through increased assessm ent value, building permit fees, the annual collect ion of the storm water assessment fee , as well as utility taxes (9.5% electric, 7% telepho ne) and franchise fees on electric, telephone, and cable. As shown on the Table below, the total fiscal impac t to the City is approximately $214,120.17. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 8 FISCAL IMPACT TO THE CITY AD VALOREM TAXES 2010 City of Delray Beach 7.1900 Mills $186,135.07 City of Delray Beach Debt 0.5316 Mills $13,762.09 SUB-TOTAL $199,897.15 NON-AD VALOREM TAXES Storm Water Assessment $14,223.02 SUB-TOTAL $214,120.17 PARK AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE $500 per unit $0.00 TOTAL $214,120.17 ZONING ANALYSIS Future Land Use Map Consistency, Concurrency, Compr ehensive Plan Consistency and Compliance with the development criteria of the LDR s were previously discussed under the “Future Land Use Map Amendment Analysis” section of this report. Compliance with the Land De velopment Regulations with respect to Standards for Rezoning Actions and Rezon ing Findings are discussed below for each property. The proposed City zoning designation is PC (Planned Commercial) while the current County zoning designation is CG (General Commercial). The surroun ding zoning designations are: PC (Planned Commercial) to the east and south; RM (Medium Densi ty Residential) and NC (Neighborhood Commercial) to the north; and County GC (General Commercial) to the west . Section 3.2.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions): standard “A”, “B”, “C”, and “E” are not applicabl e with respect to this rezoning request. The applica ble performance standards of Section 3.2.2 is as follows: D) That the rezoning shall result in allowing land use s which are deemed compatible with adjacent and nearby land use both existing and prop osed; or that if an incompatibility may occur, that sufficient regulations exist to pro perly mitigate adverse impacts from the new use. Compatibility is not a concern , as the property currently contains a shopping cente r, which has existed at this location since 1980. The initial PC (Planned Commercial) zoning designation will accommodate the existing shopping center as a permitted use. There is no development proposal associated with this request. Compatibility of any future development pr oposals with the adjacent developments will be approp riately addressed with review of such future develo pments. Section 2.4.5 (D) (5) (Rezoning Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5 (D) (5), Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(D) (5), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the City Commission must make a find ing that the rezoning fulfills one of the reasons for which the rezoning change is being soug ht. These reasons include the following: (a) That the zoning had previously been changed, or was originally established, in error; Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 9 (b) That there has been a change in circumstances which make the current zoning inappropriate; or (c) That the requested zoning is of similar intensity a s allowed under the Future Land Use Map and that it is more appropriate for the propert y based upon circumstances particular to the site and/or neighborhood. The property is develope d and the existing development is allowed under the propo sed PC zoning district. As stated above, the project is located within the “Four Corners Overlay District”. With review of the annexation request, a site visit was conducted and did reveal some code violat ions, which primarily relate to landscape and perimeter buffer deficiencies. Any fu ture development or redevelopment will be required to comply with the Land Development Regulations. In addition to the above, buildings within the “Fou r Co rners Overlay District” require a minimum floor area of 4,000 sq. ft. per building. Based upon the site pla n approved through the County, three (3) outparcel buildings have been constructed with floor areas less than 4,000 sq. ft. The existing structures are considered nonconforming and can continue. However, should a site plan modification be requested, the building square footages cannot be decreased. Finally, it is noted that a “gasoline station” is n ot an allowed use within the Four Corners Overlay District. The existing g asoline station will be classified as an existing n on -conforming use and thus subject to the regulations pertaining to non -conforming uses contain in Article 1.3 of the Land Development Regulations. Items “b” and “c” are the basis for which the rezon ing should be granted. The properties are in the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County. However, they are also within the City of Delray Beach futur e annexation area. The annexation requires that an ap propriate City zoning designation be applied to the property. The PC zoning designation is of similar i ntensity as that allowed under the proposed City GC and existing County CH -8 land use designations. Based upon the above, posi tive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 2.4.5(D) (5). REVIEW BY OTHERS The subject properties are not in an area that requ ires review by the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) or Downtown Development Authority (DDA). Palm Beach County Notice: On June 10, 2010, Palm Beach County Administrator a nd Palm Beach County Planning Division were notified of the City’s intent to annex this propert y. The County has responded that it has no objections to the proposed annexation. IPARC Notice : Notice of the Future Land Use Amendment has also been provided to the Interlocal Plan Amendment Review Committee (IPARC) which distributes the info rmation to adjacent municipalities. Lake Worth Drainage District : On July 9, 2010, Lake Worth Drainage District was n otified of the City’s intent to annex this property . Lake Worth Drainage District has submitted a letter stat ing that they do not have any objections to the pro posed annexation. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 10 Courtesy Notices: Special courtesy notices were provided to the follo wing homeowners and civic associations: Neighborhood Advisory Council High Point of Delray West PROD (Progressive Residents of Delray) Sunset Pines Coconut Key HOA Highland Trailer Co. Public Notice: Formal public notice has been provided to the affec ted property owners as well as property owners with in a 500' radius of the subject property. Additional let ters of support or objection, if any, will be prese nted at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION Accommodating the annexation of this property is consistent with the City’s prog ram for annexation of territory within its planning and service area. For the Marketplace of Delray property, the City’s advisory GC (General Commercial)) Land Use Map Designation is consistent with the County’s CH -8 (Commercial High with an underlying High Residentia l, 8 units per acre) designation in that it is compatibl e with the existing land use designations and the a djacent develo pment pattern of the adjacent development. This Future Land Use M ap designation is being proposed concurrently with a request for initial zo ning of P C (Planned Commercial) District which is also compatible with the surrounding development pattern . The annexation will provide better Police, Fire, EM S and Code Enforcement services than under County jurisdiction . The propert ies will experience an increase in ad valorem taxes . The City will receive additional revenue from property taxes, in addition to storm w ater assessment fees utility taxes, franchise fees, and li censing fees upon development. Based upon the above , the proposed Annexation, Future Land Use Map Amendment and associated Rezoning application should be approved . ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commi ssion for a City initiated V oluntary Annexation, Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment from Palm Beach County CH -8 (Commercial High with an underlying H igh Density Residential, 8 d u/ac) to City GC (General Commercial) and rezoning from County G C (General Commercial) to City GC (General Commercial) for a 30 .26 acres site for the Marketplace of Delray , an existing shopping Center , located at the northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenu e and M ilitary Trail , by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request s and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets th e criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D) (5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Development Regulations . C. Move a recommendation of de nial to the City Commission for a City initiated V oluntary Annexation, Futur e Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment from Palm Beach County CH -8 (Commercial High with an underlying High Density Residential, 8 du/ac) to Ci ty GC (General Commercial) and rezoning from County GC (General Commercial) to City GC (General Commercial) for a 30.26 acres site for the Marketplace of Delray, an existing shopping Center located at the northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of July 19, 2010 Staff Report The Marketplace – Annexation, FLUM Amendment, and Rezoning 11 finding that the request s is incon sistent with the Comprehensive Plan , and does not meet the criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D) (5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Development Regulations . RECOMMENDED ACTION D. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for a City initiated Voluntary Annexation, Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment from Palm Beach County CH -8 (Commercial High with an underlying High Density Residential, 8 du/ac) to Ci ty GC (General Commercial) and rezoning from County GC (General Commercial) to City GC (General Commercial) for a 30.26 acres s ite for the Marketplace of Delray, an existing shopping Center located at the northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the requests and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets th e criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D) (5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Development Regulations. Staff Report Prepared by: Jasmin Allen and Estelio Breto Attachments: Location Map, Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #1 8 Marketplace of Delray Existing and Proposed Colored Future Lan d Use Maps SD #18 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #1 9 Lintco Development FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Staff Report SD #19 I T E M S B E F O R E T H E B O A R D The item before the Board is that of making a recom mendation to the City Commission on a proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment from MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/ac ) to GC (General Commercial) and a proposed zoning change from RM (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) for twelve (12) individual and contiguous properties. All twelve (12) of the subject propertie s are vacant and visible from Linton Boulevard , which is a major thoroughfar e serving the City of Delray Beach. Although there is a condominium development north of these properties, it is bordered on the east and so uth by commercial uses. To the west , there is a single family residence and a fire station. The pr oposed changes seek to apply future land use and zoning designation s which are more consistent with the prevailing commercial development along Linton Boulevard. B A C K G R O U N D A N A L Y S I S The subject properties are located in a S ubdivision of Section 20, Township 46 and Range 43 , according to the public records of Palm Beach County , as recorded in Plat Book 1, Pages 4 and 5 on March 25, 1910. The twelve parcels total approximately 7.08 acres in size and are currently undeveloped . The parcels were annexed to the City of Delray Beach on October 11, 1988 via City Ordinance Number 115 -88. On December 6, 2005 , the City Commission approved Ordinance Number 56 -05 , which changed the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation from RDA -3 (Redevelopment Area -3) to MD (Multiple Family Residential) for the parcels . Also o n December 6, 2005, the City Commission approved Ordinance Number 60 -05 which changed the zoning from R -1-A (Single Family Residential) to RM (Multiple Family Residential). The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment is being processed as a part of Comprehen sive Plan A mendment 2010 -1. Plan Amendment, including text and map changes , was initiated by the Planning and Zoning Board on June 21, 2010 and by t he City Commission on July 6, 2010. Action on this amend ment by the Planning and Zoning Board is scheduled for July 19, 2010. The City Commission transmittal hearing is scheduled for Tue sday, August 3, 2010. Adoption of Comprehensive Plan amendment 2010 -1 is scheduled for October 5, 2010 , or for December 7, 2 010 if an ORC (Objection, Response and Comments) Report is issued by the State. On June 4, 2010 , Lintco, LLC request ed a land use map amendment to change the Future Land Use Map designation from MD to GC and to change the zoning from RM to GC for the subject twelve parcels, which is now before the Board for consider ation. F U T U R E L A N D U S E M A P A M E N D M E N T A N A L Y S I S Current Land Use Designation: The current Future L and Use M ap designation for the property is MD (Resident ial Medium Density 5-12 du/ac ). Requested Land Use Designation: The requested Future Land Use Designation is to GC (General Commercial). The Future Land Use Map amendment is being processe d concurrently with a n associated Comprehensive Plan text amendment to modify the description of the Gen eral Commercial designation to limit nonresidential development on the property to a maximum FAR of 0.36. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is currently permitted for nonresidential uses in the General Commercial desig nation . Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Pl an Page 2 REQUIRED FINDINGS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CHAPTER 3 – PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: Pursuant to LDR Section 3.1.1, prior to approval of Land Use applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the officia l record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials s ubmitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body whi ch has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings re late to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Co mpliance with the Land Development Regulations. Future Land Use Map: The resulting use of land or structures must be all owed in the zoning district within which the land is situated and said zoning must be consistent with the applicable land use designation as shown on the Future Land Use Map. The Futur e Land Use Map Amendment request is to change the existing MD (Residential Medium Density 5 -12 du/ac) designation t o GC (General Commercial). The G eneral C ommercial FLUM designation, as defined in the Comprehensive Plan, is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes (i.e. retail, office, services ). A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.36, which is being proposed for the subject property, will be ac complished through a Comprehensive Plan text amendment modifying the description of the General Commercial designatio n. As noted above, this text amendment is being processed concurrently with the FLUM and R ezoning change requests. The proposed change is to accommodate General Comme rcial uses for future development of the vacant land. The proposed GC (General Commercial ) zoning , in combination with the proposed GC (General Commercial) FLUM designation may allow for the best and highest use of the property . D eve lopment under the proposed zoning and land use desi gnation would be more in line with existing developments alon g Linton Boulevard . T he existing RM (Multiple Family Residential) zoning accompanied with the existing MD (Medium Density Residential) FLUM designation does not allow commercial uses . T he GC (General Commercial) zoning allows more flexibility in the dev elopment of the property. A commercial or mixed -use development would be more appropriate on a highly commercializ ed corridor like Linton Boulevard . Concurrency: Development at the highest intensity p ossible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standa rds. Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B -2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs (including public schools ), of the requested land use and/or development appl ication , will not exceed the ability of the City and The School Distr ict of Palm Beach County to fund and provide, or to require the provision of needed capital impro vements to maintain the Levels of Service Standards established in Table CI -GOP -1 of the adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of Delray Beach. The 7.08 acres within the proposed Lintco Developme nt site has a current Future Land Use designation of MD (Residential Medium Density 5 -12 du/acre). The Future Land Use Map amendment is being processed to change the FLUM designation to G C (General Commercial) and a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment is being processe d concurrently to allow mixed -use development o n the property at a nonresidential intensity lower th an that currently allowed within Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Pl an Page 3 the GC designation. The maximum intensity for nonre sidential uses within the proposed overlay district will be set at an FAR of 0.36. The concurrency analysis assumes development of the entire property within the proposed overlay district at the maximum intensity allowed under the amended description for the General Commercial designation. As shown on the following t able, development under this provision would result in the addition of nonresidential developmen t potential where none now exists. The maximum development potential with the proposed ame ndment would be a mixed -use project with residential development at 12 units per acre and re tail development at a maximum FAR of 0.36. A comparative analysis of the maximum development p otential of the property has been provided below. Table 1: Maximum Development Potential Lintco Development Overlay District EXISTING PROPOSED FLUM (acres) Maximum Development Potential FLUM (acres) Maximum Mixed Use Development Potential MD (7.08 acres ) 85 Multi -Family Residential Units (1 2 units per acre) GC (7.08 acres) Mixed -Use 85 Multi -Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 111,026 SF Retail (FAR 0.36 ) Traffic: An analysis of the traffic impacts associated with the maximum development p otential of a mixed - use development on the property was conducted by Ki mley -Horn and Associates, Inc. The entire Kimley -Horn Traffic Impact Analysis is attached as Support Document #8 within the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Report. As shown on th e followin g table from the analysis , the new maximum land use mix will represent a net incre ase in potential traffic volumes. Analyses were conducted for each of the three planning horiz ons –existing (2009), short -term (2015) and long -term (2035). In the Conclusion S ection on page 17 of the Report, the consultant ind icates that “based on the analyses within this study, the futur e land use map amendment is expected to continue to allow the significantly impacted roadwa ys to operate acceptably upon build -out of the deve lopment site.” Table 2: Trip Generation Comparison - Maximum Intensity Lintco Development Overlay District Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Pl an Page 4 Water & Sewer: Water treatment is provided by the City of Delray B each at the Water Treatment Plant. The geographic service area coincides with the Planning Area plus service provided to the Town of Gulf Stream through contract as a bulk customer. The service area encom passes approximately 18 square miles. The treatment plant, with a capacity of 28 million gallons per da y, was constructed in 1972 and has a programmed lif e of 50 years (2022). The water supply is provided from 30 active wells in four wellfields, yielding a total d esign capacity of 37.2 mgd. The City’s consumptive use permit currently limits the annual withdraw rate to 6.937 billi on gallons which equates to an average of 19 mgd. Water demand projections for the City’s Water Servi ce Area were calculated based on the City’s populat ion projections multiplied by the projected per capita demands. Potable water demand projections, cred its for the use of reclaimed water and the total excess/def icit for the years 2010 through 2030 are given in t he following table. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum dev elopment potential with the FLUM Amendment and assoc iated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36. Potable Water Demand Projections Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Service Area Population 69,335 74,504 81,114 82,233 82,556 Per Capita Use (gpd) 240 240 240 240 240 Avg. Daily Demand (MG) 16.64 17.88 19.47 19.74 19.81 Permit Base Condition (MGD) 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 Excess/(Deficit) (MGD) 2.36 1.12 (0.47) (0.74) (0.81) Alternative sources Reclaimed Water Credits for Ground Water Demand Removal 1.08 1.895 1.895 1.895 1.895 Potable demand removal 0.39 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Excess/Deficit 3.83 3.85 2.27 2.00 1.92 Notes: 1. Population projections based on Palm Beach County 2 007 Population Allocation Model using March 2008 BEBR Population Projections. 2. Per capita use assumes a 10% reduction from current permitted values achieved through conservation. 3. Permit base condition as provided by SFWMD per groun d water availability rule. Wastewater from the City is treated at the South Co unty Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWWTP), which is managed by the South Central Re gional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board, established in 1974 through an agre ement between the cities of Delray Beach and Boynton Beach. The SCRWWTP has the capacity to provide up to 24 mgd of reclaimed - quality water. In 2003, the City developed a Reclai med Water Master Plan, which identified 16 areas for reclaimed water application. The City is currently using reclaimed water to irrigate several golf courses and is installing additional t ransmission lines to serve other large users. Through the use of reclaimed water, the City’s 20 -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Pl an Page 5 indicates that water supply facilities are planned and will be available to meet the futur e growth and water demands of the City of Delray Beach throu gh the year 2030. The wastewater treatment plant was constructed in 1 979, with a programmed life of 50 years (2029). Ultimate disposal is currently by ocean dis charge of secondary effluent and land spreading of sludge. In late 2008, deep well injection replac ed the ocean discharge except for emergency situations and DEP permitted exceptions. Also in la te 2008, with completion of the Palm Beach Co unty Biosolids Pelletization facility, land spreadi ng of sludge is longer being used. The design capacity of the treatment plant, established by its secondary treatment capacity, is 24 mgd. This capacity is shared equally between Boynton Beach an d Delray Beach. The current plant has adequate capacity to service the City’s projected p opulation beyond the year 2025. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate wa stewater treatment capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum development potential with the FLUM amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 0.36. Since adequate capacity is available in the City’s water and wastewater systems to meet the increased demand, the proposed FL UM amendment will not impact the level of service s tandard for these facilities. Drainage: The adopted LOS standards for drainage is the SFWMD standard of retention of the first one inch of runoff or 2.5 inches of water storage times the percentage of impervious area. Local and City - wide drainage deficiencies are identified in the St ormwater Master Plan (Kimley -Horn, 2000). The City has programmed projects to correct the deficie ncies identified in this report and achieve the Level of Service standard. Public Facilities Elemen t Objective E -1 states: A capital improvement program directed specifically to storm drainage and runoff management has been adopted by the City Commission, and capita l projects, as identified in that program, shall be implemented with funding to come from the Stormw ater Utility Fee. Drainage is reviewed during the site plan applicati on process for individual projects. Within this area of the City, drainage is usually accommodated on site via exfiltration trench systems or swale reten tion areas. There are no problems anticipated with obtaining South Florida Water Management District permits within the area and any additional impacts caused by increased impervious area will not affect the level of servic e standard. Parks & Recreation The Open Space and Recreation Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan indicates in its conclusion that “The City will have sufficient recreation facilitie s at build -out to meet the adopted standards.” The LOS standard for open space and recreation in the city is 3 acres per 1,000 residents. The amount of land currently provided in activity based recreation facilities, the municipal beaches, and the two public golf courses, establishes a level of service of 6.2 acres per 1,000 residents (2007), far exceeding the general g uideline. A park impact fee is collected to offset any impact s that new development may have on the City’s recreational facilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, a park impact fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of a build ing permit for each residential unit. Since there i s no net increase in the residential development pote ntial on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment which limits the maxi mum nonresidential FAR to 0.36, this level of service standard is not affected. Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Pl an Page 6 Education (School Concurrency): Since there is no net increase in the residential d evelopment potential on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment which limits the maxi mu m nonresidential FAR to 0.36, this level of service s tandard is not affected. Solid Waste: As shown on the following table, with the proposed amendment, the development of the property would result in a net increase of 566 tons per year in solid waste generation. In its annual capacity letter, dated January 6, 2010, the Solid Waste Auth ority indicates that it has sufficient capacity for concurrency management and comprehensive planning p urposes. As stated in the letter, “Capacity is available for both the coming year, an d the five and ten year planning periods specified in 9J -5-005(4).” Based on population projections, waste gen eration rate projections, waste reduction, and recycling, the Solid Waste Aut hority forecasts that capacity will be available at the existing landfill through approximately the yea r 2030. The Board of the Solid Waste Authority has authorized the initial design and per mitting efforts to develop a new landfill on 1,600 acres owned by the authority. The capacity of this new landfill w ould extend the life of the solid waste system beyond the year 2043 or later. Table 3: Solid Waste Generation Lintco Development Overlay District Existing Maximum Development Potential Proposed Mixed -Use Maximum Development Potential 85 MF Units @.52 to ns/year = 44.2 tons/yr 111,026 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 566 tons/year 85 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 44.2 tons/yr Based on the above analysis, positive findings can be made at this time with regard to concurrency for all services and facilities. Consiste ncy: The requested designation is consistent with t he goals, objectives and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. The following applicable Comprehensive Plan objecti ve and policies are noted: Future Land Use Element Policy A -1.7: Amen dments to the FLUM must be based upon the findings listed below, and must be supported by data and analysis that demonstrate compliance with these findings: Demonstrated Need -- That there is a need for the requested land use. Th e need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demograp hic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing chara cter and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive pl an objective or policy, annexation into the municipal boundaries, or similar circumstances. The need mus t be supported by data and analysis verifying the changing demographics or other circumstances. This requirement shall not apply to requests for the FLU M designations of Conservation or Recreation and Op en Space; nor shall it apply to FLUM changes associ ated with annexations when the City’s Advisory FLUM designati on is being applied, or when the requested designation is of a similar intensity to the Advisory designation. However, the findings described in the remainder of this policy must be addressed with all FLUM amendments. The requested GC FLUM designation will allow commercial uses , whereas only residential uses are currently allowed on the subject parcels. The proposed land use map change is more c onsistent Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Pl an Page 7 with t he existing character of the commercial nature of Linton Boulevard . These circumstances demonstrate a need for the requested zoning and FLU M change. Future Land Use Element Objective A -1: Property shall be developed or redeveloped, in a manner so that the future use, intensity and density are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; encourage affordable goods and services; are complementary to and compatible with adjacent land uses; and fulfi ll remaining land use needs. There are no significant environmental characterist ics to the subject property. The existing use of the property is vacant land. In the absence of a sp ecific use , it is currently compatible with the adjacent land uses, which c onsist s of commercial to the east, retail to the south, and residential to the north and west. However, the proposed commercial use may have some compatibility concerns with the residentially zoned properties to the west and north. To mitigate these concer ns landscaping, berms or privacy walls will be install ed per Code requirements. This shall be more specifically addressed upon the official submittal of a development proposal during site plan review. Compliance with LDRs : Development under the requested designation will co mply with the provisions and requirements of the Land Development Regulations. Whenever an item is identified elsewhere in these L and Development Regulations (LDRs), it shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on a land development application/request. Such items are found in Section 2.4.5 and in specia l regulation portions of individual zoning district regulations. At this time, no physical improvements are proposed . If and when improvements are made, a site p lan review will be required. No concerns meeting t he LDR requirements are anticipated. Compatibility : The requested designation will be compatible with t he existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. As demonstrated in the following “Rezoning Analysis” section , the requested GC (General Commercial) zoning and FLUM designation will be compatible with existing and fu ture land uses of the surrounding area. R E Z O N I N G A N A L Y S I S Future Land Use Map Consistency, Concurrency, Compr ehensive Plan Consistency and Compliance with the development criteria of the LDR were previ ously discussed under the “Future Land Use Map Amendment Analysis” section of this report. Compliance with the Land D evelopment Regulations with respect to Standards for Rezoning Actions and Rezon ing Findings are discussed below. Section 3.2.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions): S tandards “A”, “B”, “C”, and “E” are not applicable with respect to this rezoning request. Standard “D” requires that the rezoning shall result in allowing land uses which are deemed compatible w ith adjacent and nearby land use both existing and proposed; or that if an incompatibilit y may occur, that sufficient regulations exist to properly mitigate adverse impacts from the new use. LAND USE A NALYSIS : Existing land uses Subject Property - Residential (Zoning District: RM ; FLU M : MD ) North – Residential (Zoning District: RM ; FLU M: MD ) South – Retail (Zoning District: PC ; FLU M: GC ) Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Pl an Page 8 East – Commercial (Zoning District: MIC & POD ; FLU M: CMR & TRN ) W est – Residential (Zoning District: R-1-A & CF ; FLU M: MD & CF ) Proposed land uses Subject Pro perty – Commercial (Zoning District: GC ; FLU M: GC) North – Residential (Zoning District: RM; FLU M: MD) South – Retail (Zoning District: PC ; FLU M: GC) East – Comme rcial (Zoning District: MIC & POD; FLU M: CMR & TRN) West – Residential (Zoning District: R-1-A & CF; FLU M: MD & CF) The subject property is bordered on the north and west by residential properties zoned for residential use which are com patible with the ex isting zoning of this property . However, with the rezoning to commercial use, there will need to be adequate buffering by means of a wall , barrier or landscape buffer to mitigate any potenti al negative impacts. Nonetheless, with the current use remaining v acant , there are no immediate reasons for concern. Future development of the property for commercial use or mixed -use , if granted, will need to take necessary measures to mitigate any potential negati ve impact on adjacent residential uses. Across SW 4 th A venue to the east is a compatible commercial use (S ecurity Self Storage). Likewise, the existing medical offices to the east are a compatible commercial use. Across Linton Boulevard to the south are compatible retail and commercial uses (New Century C ommons). It is noted that the proposed Future Land Use Desig nation of GC (General Commercial) is shared with the existing re tail shopping center to the south. Based upon the above, this request does not result in an incompati ble land use, thus, the propos ed development can be found to be in compliance wit h LDR Section 3.2.2 (D). Section 2.4.5 (D) (5) (Rezoning Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5 (D) (5), Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(D)(5), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the City Commissio n must make a finding that the rezoning fulfills on e of the reasons for which the rezoning change is being sought. These reasons include the following: (a) That the zoning had previously been changed, or was originally established, in error; (b) That there has been a change in circumstances which make the curre nt zoning inappropriate; or (c) That the requested zoning is of similar intensity a s allowed under the Future Land Use Map and that it is more appropriate for the propert y based upon circumstances particular to the site and/or neighborhood. The basis for which the rezoning should be granted, relates to the item (c) above, indicating that the requested zoning of GC is of similar intensity as allowed under the proposed Future Land Use Map Designation of GC which is also being requested. A G C zoning designation is more appropriate for the property given its location along a major east -west commercialized thoroughfare . Because of its location, the parcel would better se rve the needs of the general public as a commercial use. Future development of the property as commercial or mixed use will deem it necessary to mitigate potential negative effects on adjacent res idential properties. T he condominium development to the north is internally positioned o n SW 4 th Avenue and bordered by walls on Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Pl an Page 9 all sides so it will be minimally affected by antic ipated commercial development of the subject property. The single family residence to the west i s abutted by a fire station to its west which further brings to question its appropriateness as an isolated residential use along Linton Boulevard. Under these circumstances the rezoning to GC is more appropriate. Base d upon these positive findings, the proposed development is in compliance with LDR Section 2.4.5(D)(5). R E V I E W B Y O T H E R S The proposed rezoning is not in a geographic area r equiring review by either the Historic Preservation Board (HPB), Downtown Development Authority (DDA), or the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). Courtesy Notices: A special courtesy notice was provided to the follo wing homeowners associations: x Neighborhood Advisory Council x Progressive Residents Of Delray (PROD ) x Linton Ridge x Southridge x Southridge Village x The Vinings IPARC Notice : On July 9, 2010 , notice of the Future Land Use Amendment was provided to the Interlocal Plan Amendment Review Committee (IPARC) which distributes the information to adjacent municipalities. N o objections have been received to date. Public Notices: Formal public notice has been provided to property owners within a 500' radius of the subject property. Letters of objection and/or supp ort, if any, will be presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. A S S E S S M E N T A N D C O N C L U S I O N Positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), LDR Secti on 3.2.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions), LDR Section 2.4.5(D)(5) (Rezoning Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Com prehensive Plan. Therefore, rezoning of the subject property fro m RM to GC , and a FLUM amendment from MD to GC , can be recommended for approval , based on the findings outlined herein . D I S C R E T I O N A R Y A C T I O N S A. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for the request for rezoning from RM (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial ) and a Future Land Use M ap amendment from MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/ac ) to GC (General Commercial) for the subject property, by adopting the findings of f act and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and meet s the criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D)(5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Development Regulations. B. Move a recommendation of denial to the City Com mission for the request for rezoning from RM (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial ) and a Future Land Use M ap amendment from MD (Residential Medium Density 5-12 du/ac) to GC (General Commercial), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and does not meet the criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D)(5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Developmen t Regulations. Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – July 19, 2010 Lintco at 551 Linton Boulevard – Rezoning and FLUM Amendment to the Comprehensive Pl an Page 10 C. Move to postpone a recommendation of approval or denial in order to continue reviewing the request for rezoning from RM (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commerc ial) and a F uture L and U se M ap amendment from MD (Residential Medium Density 5 -12 du/ac) to GC (General Commercial ) for the subject property with direction . S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Board m ove to recommend approval to the City Commission for the request for rezoning from RM (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial ) and a Future Land Use Map amendment from MD (Residential Medium Density 5 -12 du/ac) to GC (General Commercial) for the subject property , by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and meet s the criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D)(5), 3.1.1 and 3.2.2 of the Land Development Regulations. Attachments: Vicinity Map Zoning District Map Future Land Use Map COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SUPPORT DOCUMENT #20 Waterford FLUM Amendment Staff Report SD #20 I T E M S B E F O R E T H E B O A R D The action before the Board is making a recommendat ion to the City Commission on a privately - initiated Future Land Use Map a mendment from TRN (Transitional ) to GC (General Commercial , for a 4.58 acre parcel located within Waterford Park , east of I -95 and south of Linton Boulevard , behind Home Depot. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.2(E)(6), the Planning and Zoning Board shall review and make a recommendation to the City Commission with r espect to all amendments to the City's Future Land Use Map . B A C K G R O U N D On August 3, 2010, the City Commission initiated se veral additional items to be included as part of Compr ehensive Plan Amendment 2010 -1 , which was originally initiated on July 6, 2010. T hese additional items included this FLUM amendment and a n associated text amendment. The City Commission transmittal hearing for Comprehensive Pl an Amendment 2010 -1 is schedul ed for Tuesday, August 17, 2010. Adoption of the Amendment is scheduled for October 5, 2010, or for December 7, 2010, if an ORC (Objection, Response an d Comments) Report is issued by the State. The 4.58 acre subject property is currently undeveloped. It is describe d as Parcel “B” on the Plat of Waterford Park, as recorded in Plat Book 91, pages 119 -120, of the Public Record s of Palm Beach County , Florida . It has a Transitional (TRN) Future Land Use Map (FLUM ) designation and a S AD (Special Activities District) zoning designation. The property is bordered to the south and east by the Tierra Verde at Delray Beach residential condomini um development ; on the north by Home Depo t ; and to the west by I-95 . A hotel is approved on the subject property as a part of the Waterford SAD. The applicant has indicated in his application that a hotel development is not viable because of market conditions, geographical location , and development of the surrounding area . The proposed changes seek to apply a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation which is more consistent with the prevailing commercial development along Linton Boul evard. The ultimate intent of the applicant is to build a retail development on the site. A c hange from the TRN (Transitional ) Future Land Use Map designation to GC (General Commercial ) will allow development of the site with a wider ran ge of commercial uses . Please note that a rezoning application for this pr operty –from SAD (Special Activities D istrict) to GC (General Commercial)–had originally been submitted for concurrent processing with the FLUM amendment. During review of the applications, City staff found that the existing zoning was more appropriate, given the parcel’s location as part of the Waterford SAD; and since SAD zoning is already consistent with the General Commercial FLUM designation, a rezoning would not be required. At staff’s suggestion, t he rezoning application was withdrawn by the applicant . F U T U R E L A N D U S E M A P A M E N D M E N T A N A L Y S I S Current Future Land Use Map Designation: The current TRN (Tran sitional) FLUM designation allows mixed -use development with a maximum residential density of 12 du/ac and non -residential uses at a maximum intensity of 1.0 floor -area ratio (FAR). This equates to a maximum development intensity of 55 dw ellings units and 199,505 square feet of c ommercial use for this site . Requested Future Land Use Map Designation: The requested Future Land Use Map Designa tion is GC (General Commercial). This F LUM designation allows mixed -use development with a maximum residential density of 12 du/ac and non - residential uses at a maximum intensity of 3 .0 floor -area ratio (FAR). However, t h is Future Land Use Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 2 Map amendment is being processed concurrently with an associated Com prehensive Plan text amendment , which will modify the description of the General Commercial fu ture l and u se designation to create an overlay district for this property and re duce the maximum non -residenti al Floor Area Ratio from 3.0 to 1.32 . The new maximum floor area ratio does not reflect any specific land development proposal, but is based instead on the maximum development potential that could be accommodated under traffic concurrency standards. With the combi nation of the FLUM and text amendments, the maximum development intensity of the site will be 5 5 dwelling units (12 du/ac) and 2 63 ,346 sq. ft. of retail use (FAR=1.32). Under this scenario, the max imum non -residential intensity will increase by 32% and the maximum residential intensity will remain t he same as under the current TRN designation. REQUIRED FINDINGS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CHAPTER 3 – PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: Pursuant to LDR Section 3.1.1, prior to approval of Land Use applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the officia l record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials s ubmitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Co mpliance with the Land Development Regulations. Future Land Use Map: The resulting use of land or structures must be all owed in the zoning district within which the land is situated a nd said zoning must be consistent with the applicable land use designation as shown on the Future Land Use Map. Pursuant to Land Development Regulation Section 3.1 .1 (A) (Future Land Use Map), t he resulting use of land or structures must be allowed in the zo ning district within which the land is situated and said zoning must be consistent with the applica ble future land use designation as s hown on the Future Land Use Map . The Futur e Land Use Map Amendment request is to change the existing TRN (Transitional ) designation t o GC (General Commercial). The G eneral C ommercial FLUM designation, as defined in the Comprehensive Plan, is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes (i.e. retail, office, services ). Although a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is generally permitted for non -residential u ses within this designation, a lower maximum non - residential Floor Area Ratio for the subject property, will be accomplished through a proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendment , which would establish an o verlay district on the property and apply a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 1.32. The proposed change is to accommodate General Comme rcial uses for future retail development of the undeveloped property . The proposed GC (General Commercial) FLUM designa tion will allow for the highest and best use of the property . G iven its location , a commercial or mixed -use development is appropriate within this highly comme rcialized corridor (Linton Boulevard) and proximity to I -95. Since the GC (General Commercial) FLUM designation allow s more flexibility in the range of commercial uses, d eve lopment under this designation will be more in line with Linton International Plaza , D elray Crossing Shopping Center and other existing commercial developments along Linton Boulevard . The General Commercial FLUM designation is consistent with the existing SAD (Special Activi ties District) zoning designation on the property, and therefore, positive findings c an be made with respect to this performance standard. It is noted, however, that future approval for deve lopment of the property for anything other than the approved hotel will require a modification of the previously Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 3 approved SAD. M odification of an SAD is considered to be a rezoning and must comply with th e procedures and required findings of that process. All uses which are to be allowed in a particular SAD must be indicated within a rezoning ordinance approved by the City Commission. Since SAD zoning is meant to deal with unique situations, a complete site and development plan with, at least, preliminary engineering plans must be processed c oncurrent ly with the rezoning application , and the approved site plan must be referenced in the re zoning ordinance . Concurrency: Development at the highest intensity p ossible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standa rds. Concurrency , as defined pursuant to Objective B -2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan , must be met ; and a determination made that the public facility nee ds of the requested land use and/or development application , will not exceed the ability of the City and t he School District of Palm Beach County to fund and pr ovide, or to require the provision of needed capital improvements to maintain the Levels of Serv ice Standards established in Table CI -GOP -1 of the adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of De lray Beach. The following concurrency analysis assumes development of the ent ire property within the overlay district at the maximum intensity allowed under the new Futu re Land Use Map designation at intensities established in the amended description for the General Commercial designation. As shown on the following table, development under thi s provision would result in a n increase of non - residential development potential from the current 199,505 square feet to 2 63 ,346 square feet . The maximum residential density will remain the same at 12 du/ac. The maximum development potential with the proposed amendment would be a mixed -use project with residential development at 12 units per acre a nd retail development at a maximum FAR of 1 .3 2 as indicated above. A comparative analysis of the m aximum development potential of the property has been provided below. Table 1: Maximum Development Potential Waterford Park – Parcel “B” EXISTING PROPOSED FLUM (acres) Maximum Development Potential FLUM (acres) Maximum Mixed Use Development Potential TRN (4.5 8 acres) Mixed -Use 55 Multi -Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 199,505 SF Retail (FAR 1.0) GC (4.5 8 acres) Mixed -Use 5 5 Multi -Family Residential Units (12 units per acre) & 2 63 ,346 SF Retail (FAR 1.32) Traffic: An analysis of the traffic impacts associated with the maximum develop ment potential of a mixed - use development on the property was conducted by Ki mley -Horn and Associates, Inc. As shown on T able 2 below , the new maximum land use mix will represent a net increase in potent ial traffic volumes. Table 2 indicates a net new external trip increase of 1,7 72 ADT (Average Daily Traffic ), with 5 1 AM peak hour trips and 196 PM peak hour trips with the proposed 1.32 FAR (Floor Area Ratio). Kimley -Horn and Associates, indicate d in its report that “based on the analyses within this study, the future land use map amendment is expecte d to continue to allow the significantly impacted roadways to operate acceptably upon build -out of the development site.” Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 5 Water & Sewer: Water treatment is provided by the City of Delray B each at the Water Treatment Plant. The geographic service area coincides with the Planning Area plus service provided to the Town of Gulf Stream through contract as a bulk customer. Th e service area encompasses approximately 18 square miles. The treatment plant, with a capaci ty of 28 million gallons per day, was constructed in 1972 and has a programmed life of 50 years (2022). The water supply is provided from 30 active wells in four wellfields, yielding a total design capacity of 37.2 mgd. The City’s consumptive use permit currently limits the annual withdraw rate to 6.937 billion gallons which equates to an average of 19 mgd (million ga l lons per day). Water demand projections for the City’s Water Servi ce Area were calculated based on the City’s population projections multiplied by the projected per capita demands. Potable water demand projections, credits for the use of reclaimed water and the total exc ess/deficit for the years 2010 through 2030 are given in the following table. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate capacity exists to service the subject pro perty at its maximum development potential with the FLUM Amendment and associated text amendment, w hich limits the maximum nonresidential FAR (Floor Area Ratio) to 1 .3 2. Potable Water Demand Projections Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Service Area Population 69,335 74,504 81,114 82,233 82,556 Per Capita Use (gpd) 240 240 240 240 240 Avg. Daily Demand (MG) 16.64 17.88 19.47 19.74 19.81 Permit Base Condition (MGD) 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 Excess/(Deficit) (MGD) 2.36 1.12 (0.47) (0.74) (0.81) Alternative sources Reclaimed Water Credits for Ground Water Demand Removal 1.08 1.895 1.895 1.895 1.895 Potable demand removal 0.39 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Excess/Deficit 3.83 3.85 2.27 2.00 1.92 Notes: 1. Population projections based on Palm Beach County 2 007 Population Allocation Model using March 2008 BEBR Population Projections. 2. Per capita use assumes a 10% reduction from current permitted values achieved through conservation. 3. Permit base condition as provided by SFWMD per grou nd water availability rule. Wastewater f rom the City is treated at the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWWTP), which is managed by the South Central Re gional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board, established in 1974 through an agre ement between the cities of Delray Beach and Boynton Beach. The SCRWWTP has the capacity to prov ide up to 24 mgd of reclaimed -quality water. In 2003, the City developed a Reclaimed Wate r Master Plan, which identified 16 areas for reclaimed water application. The City is currently using reclaimed water to irri gate several golf courses and is installing additional transmission l ines to serve other large users. Through the use of reclaimed water, the City’s 20 -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan indicates th at water supply facilities are planned and will be available to meet the future growth and water demands of the City of Delray Beach through the year 2030. Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 6 The wastewater treatment plant was constructed in 1 979, with a programmed life of 50 years (2029). Ultimate disposal was o r iginally by ocean discharge of secondary effluent and land spreading of sludge. In late 2008, deep well inject ion replaced the ocean discharge except for emergency situations and DEP permitted exceptions. Also in late 2008, with completion of the Palm Beach County Biosolids Pelletization facility, land spreading of sludge is longer being used. The design capacity of the treatment plant, establi shed by its secondary treatment capacity, is 24 mgd. This capacity is shared equally between Boynto n Beach and Delray Beach. The current plant has adequate capacity to service the City’s project ed population beyond the year 2025. The City’s Utilities Department has indicated that adequate wa stewater treatment capacity exists to service the subject property at its maximum development pot ential with the FLUM amendment and associated text amendment, which limits the maximum nonresidential FAR to 1 .3 2. Since adequate capacity is available in the City’s water and wastewater systems to meet the increased demand, the proposed FLUM amendment will not impact the level of service standard for these facilities. Drainage: The adopted LOS standard for drainage is the SFWMD standard of retention of the first one inch of runoff or 2.5 inches of water storage times the per centage of impervious area. Drainage is reviewed during the site plan application process f or individual projects. Within this area of the Cit y, drainage is usually accommodated on site via ex -filtration trench systems or swale retention areas. There are no problems anticipated with obtaining So uth Florida Water Management District permits within the area and any additional impacts caused by increased impervious area will not affect the level of service standard. Parks & Recreation The Open Space and Recreation Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan indicates in its conclusion that “The City will have sufficient recreation facilitie s at build -out to meet the adopted standards.” The LOS standard for open space and recreation in the city is 3 acres pe r 1,000 residents. The amount of land currently provided in activity based recreation facilities, the municipal beaches, and the two public golf courses, establishes a level of service of 6.2 acres per 1,000 residents (2007), far exceeding the general gui deline. A park impact fee is collected to offset any impact s that new development may have on the City’s recreational facilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, a park impact fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of a build ing permit for each residential unit. Since there i s no net increase in the residential development pote ntial on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment , this level of service standard is not affected. Education (School Concurrency): Since there is no net increase in the residential d evelopment potential (12 units per acre – 55 total allowed under each designation) on this site with the proposed FLUM Amendment, this level of service standard is not af fected. Solid Waste: As shown on the following table, with the proposed amendment, the development of the property would result in a net increase of 326 tons per year in solid waste generation. In its ann ual capacity letter, dated January 6, 2010, the Solid Waste Auth ority indicates that it has sufficient capacity for concurrency management and comprehensive planning p urposes. As stated in the letter, “Capacity is available for both the coming year, and the five and ten year planning periods specified in 9J -5- Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 7 005(4).” Based on population projections, waste gen eration rate projections, waste reduction, and recycling, the Solid Waste Authority forecasts that capacity will be available at the existing landfil l through approximately the year 2030. The Board of t he Solid Waste Authority has authorized the initial design and permitting efforts to develop a new landfill on 1,600 acres owned by the authority. The capacity of this new landfill would extend the life of the solid waste system beyond the year 2043 or later. Table 3: Solid Waste Generation Waterford Overlay District Existing Maximum Development Potential Proposed Mixed -Use Maximum Development Potential 199,505 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 1,017 tons/year 55 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 28.6 tons/yr 2 63 ,346 SF Retail @10.2 lbs/sf = 1,343 tons/year 55 MF Units @.52 tons/year = 28.6 tons/yr Based on the above analysis, positive findings can be made at this time with regard to concurrency for all services and facilities. Consistency: The requested designation is consisten t with the goals, objectives and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. The following applicable Comprehensive Plan objecti ve and policies are noted: Future Land Use Element Policy A -1.7: Amendments to the FLUM must be based upon the findings listed below, and must be supported by data and analysis that demonstrate compliance with these findings: Demonstrated Need -- That there is a need for the requested land use. Th e need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demograp hic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing chara cter and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive pl an objective or policy, annexation into the municipal boundaries, or similar circumstances. The need must be supported by data and analysis verifying the changing demographics or other circumstances. This requirement shall not apply to requests for the FLU M designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space; nor shall it apply to FLUM changes associated with annexations when the City’s Advisory FLUM designati on is being applied, or when the requested designation is of a similar intensity to the Advisory designation. However, the findings described in the remainder of this policy must be addressed with all FLUM amendments. The applicant has provided the following justificat ion statement for the Future Land Use Map amendment being requested: "The subject property has remained vacant for a numb er of years. It has a Transitional Land Use FLUM and an SAD zoning design ation. There was a previous approval several years ago for a hotel on the subject property. Because of various market conditions, the geographical loca tion, and the development of the surrounding area, hotel development is not viab le, and a change from the Transitional Land Use designation to General Commer cial is more appropriate. The Transitional designation allows for both reside ntial and non -residential uses; however, the non -residential (commercial use s) are lim ited to those allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial zoning category. Becaus e of the size of the property, 4.58 acres, and its location in the direc t proximate location of substantial commercial uses such Linton Internation al Plaza, Ross, Target, and Home Depot among others, a General Commercial FLUM designation will Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 8 enhance the viability of the site. Rather than havi ng several smaller neighborhood "mom & pop" users which tend to come a nd go based on economic conditions, a General Commercial FLUM desi gnation will make the site available for a more substantial commercial user, w hich will be more financially stable, less likely to "go dark", and depending on the use, be more destination - oriented and not in need of direct frontage on Lint on. Attracting a substantial commercial user will add to the stability of the ar ea and provide a more secure tax payer which will benefit the City. The requeste d FLUM designation is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and can meet adopted concurrency standards. The Gen eral Commercial development of the site is compatible with existing and future land uses and because of the size of the subject property, adequa te buffers can be incorporated into the project's development adjacent to the rental apartments in the vicinity." The existing Transitional FLUM designation currently allows for both residential and non - residential uses; however, the non -residential commercial uses are generally limited to those allowed in the NC (Neighborh ood Commercial), POC (Planned Office Center) and PO D (Professional and Office) zoning districts. It is noted, however, that SADs have be en approved which include uses not allowed within the applicable conventional zoning d esignations. For example, although a hotel is currently approved on the subject proper ty within the Waterford SAD, this use is not permitted within the conventional z oning districts allowed within the Transitional FLUM designation. T he applicant states that a hotel development is not viable because of market conditions, geographical location , and development of the surrounding area . The proposed changes seek to apply a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation which is more consistent with the prevailing commercial development along Linton Boulevard. The applicant states that these changes will make the site available for a substantial retail de velopment with a commercially stable user , which will be more financially stable, less likely to "go dark", and depending on the use, be more destination -oriented and not in need of direct frontage on Lint on Boulevard . The General Commercial FLUM designation allows for the wider range of uses permitted within the GC (General Commercial) zoning district. The pr oposed FLUM designation is more consistent with the existing commercial character of the Linto n Boulevard corridor. The applicant states that b ecause of the size of the property and its location in direct proxim ity to substantial commercial uses , such as Linton International Pla za, D elray Crossing Shopping Center, Ross, Target, and Home Depot among others, a General Commercial FLUM designation will enhance the viability of the site . This may be true since there will be a wider range of development options available within the proposed FLUM designation. However, it must be noted that future approval for development of the property for anything other than the approve d hotel will require a modification of the previously approved SAD and processed as a rezoning application. As indicated above, t hese circumstances demonstrate a need for the reque sted FLUM change. Future Land Use Element Objective A -1: Property shall be developed or redeveloped, in a manner so that the future use, intensity and density are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; encourage affordable goods and services; are complementary to and compatible with adjacent land uses; and fulfill remaining land use needs. There are no significant environmental characterist ics to the subject property. The existing use of the property is undeveloped land. In the absence of a specific use , it is currently compatible with the adjacent land uses, which include the Tierra Verde at Delray Beach residential condominium development to the south and east and Home Depot to the north. The property is border ed on the Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 9 west by a lake and I -95. Since the property is approved for a hotel development within the SAD zoning , non -residential development of the property ha s already been anticipated. Hotel development remains consistent with the proposed Ge neral Commercial FLUM designation, and the approved hotel could still be constructed on th e property following this amendment. However, i t will also be possible for the SA D to be modified to accommodate most types of commercial, office and mixed -use development. F uture commercial development of the property will be compatible with the commercial development to the north, and there will be no impa ct on the open spa ce/I -95 corridor to the west. D uring the Site Plan Review process, vehicular and pedestrian access, building heights and setbacks, parking lot lighting, landscaping and buffering ele ments, such as landscaping, berms or privacy walls, will all be ev aluated to mitigate impacts on the adjacent residential development to the south and east . Compliance with LDRs : Development under the requested designation will co mply with the provisions and requirements of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5 and Article 4.6 Suppl emental District Regulations, whenever an item is identified elsewhere in the Land Development Regulations, it shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on a land development application/request. At this time, no physical improvements have been proposed on the subject property . W hen improvements a re proposed in the future , a site plan review and approval will be required. S taff does not anticipate any concerns regarding compliance with Land Development Regulations. As noted above , additional buffering will be required where the property abuts residential us es. Compatibility : The requested designation will be compatible with t he existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. The requested General FLUM designation will allow f or f uture commercial development of the undeveloped property . Future commercial development will be compatible with the existing commercial development to the north (Home Depot), and there will be no impact on the op en space/I -95 corridor to the west. During the Site Plan Revie w process, vehicular and pedestrian access, building heights and setbacks, parking lot lighting, landscaping and buffering elements, such as landscaping, berms or privacy walls, will a ll be evaluated to mitigate impacts on the adjacent residential development to the south and e ast. Based on the above, the requested GC (General Commercial) FLUM designation will be compa tible with existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. R E V I E W B Y O T H E R S The proposed rezoning is not in a geographic area requiring review by eit her the Historic Preservation Board (HPB), Downtown Development Authority (DDA), or the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). Courtesy Notices: A special courtesy notice was provided to the followi ng homeowners associations: x Neighborhood Advisory Council x Progressive Residents Of Delray (PROD ) x Waterford Apartments x Tierra Verde at Delray Beach x Southridge x Southridge Village x Linton Ridge Public Notices: Formal public notice has been provided to property owners within a 500' radius of the subject property. Please note that a letter of objection ha s been attached to this report. Additional l etters of objection and/or support, if any, will be presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting . Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report – August 16, 2010 Waterford Park, Parcel “B”, FLUM Amendment Page 10 A S S E S S M E N T A N D C O N C L U S I O N Positive findings can be made with respect to Future Land Use Element Policy A -1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), LDR S ection 3.1.1 (Required Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensiv e Plan. Therefore, the proposed FLUM Amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (G eneral Commercial) should be approved based on the findings described in this staff report. Thus, a recommendat ion for approval to the City commission can be made . D I S C R E T I O N A R Y A C T I O N S A. Continue with direction. B. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission of a request for Future Land Use Map A mendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Com mercial , for the Waterford Park Parcel “B”, by adopting the findings of fact and law containe d in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy A -1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), LDR S ection 3.1.1 (Required Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehe nsive Plan . C. Move a recommendation of denial to the City Commission of a request for Future Land Use Map Amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Co mmercial, for the Waterford Park Parcel “B”, by adopting the findings of fact and law conta ined in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is not consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy A -1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), LDR S ection 3.1.1 (Required Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehe nsive Plan. S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission of a request for Future Land Use Map Amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Co mmercial, for the Waterford Park Parcel “B”, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request a nd approval thereof is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy A -1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), LDR Section 3.1.1 (Requi red Findings), and the Goals, Objectives, and Polic ies of the Comprehensive Plan. Attachments: Location Map Zoning District Map Future Land Use Map Letter of Objection PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: JULY 19, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: IV.A. RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION REGARDING TRANSMITTAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2010 -1. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is that of recommending t o the City Commission transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010 -1 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS The City Commission initiated Comprehensive Plan Am endment 2010 -1 on July 6, 2010 . This ame ndment represents the first amendment for the year 20 10 and include d two (2) city -initiated Future Land Use Map Amendments, nineteen (19) city -initiated text amendments, one (1) privately -initiated Future Land Use Map Amendment and one (1) privately -initia ted text amendment. It is noted that two (2) of the city -initiated text amendments have been deleted. A brief description of each item suggested for inclus ion in the Plan Amendment is listed below: TEXT AMENDMENTS: x City -initiated : Capital Improvement Ele ment - Update the City’s Five -Year Capital Improvements Schedule (Table CI -CIP) to reflect adoption of the FY2010 -FY2014 Capital Improvements Program. x City -initiated : Capital Improvement Element - Update the City’s Reclaimed Water Capital Improvement Sched ule (Table RW -CIP) to reflect adoption of the FY2010 -FY2014 Capital Improvements Program. x City -initiated : Capital Improvement Element - Update the Palm Beach County School District’s Capital Improvement Schedule (Table SD -CIP) to reflect adoption of its FY 2010 - FY2014 Capital Improvements Program. x City -initiated : Conservation Element - Modification of Policy E -1.1, dealing with the Green Task Force, to reflect new name (Green Implementati on Advancement Board) and new Board purpose. x City -initiated : Future Land Use Element - Modification of Policy A -1.4 to extend the time frame for completion of a study on economic develop ment issues from FY08/09 to FY11/12. x City -initiated : Future Land Use Element - Modification of Policy A -1.10 to extend the time frame for eva luating the need for establishing design guidelines for the Congress Avenue Corridor and the Four Corners Overlay District from FY08/09 to FY10/11. x City -initiated : Future Land Use Element - Modification of Policy A -1.11 to extend the time to develop of a marketing plan to attract new business and promote redevelopment of the Congress Avenue corridor from FY08/09 to FY10/11. P&Z Board Staff Report - July 19, 20 10 IV.A. Transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2 010 -1 Page 2 x City -initiated : Future Land Use Element - Modification of Policy A -2.5 to extend the time frame for analysis of the Land Development Regulati ons, dealing with nonconforming uses, from FY08/09 to FY11/12. x City -initiated : Future Land Use Element - Modification of Policy C -1.4 to extend the time frame for evaluating the need for establishing desi gn guidelines for the North Federal Highway co rridor from FY08/09 to FY10/11. x City -initiated : Future Land Use Element - Modification of Policy C -1.12 to extend the time frame for completion of a Redevelopment Plan for th e South Federal Highway from FY08/09 to FY10/11. x City -initiated: Future Land Use E lement - Modification of Policy C -1.13 to extend the time frame for completion of a Redevelopment Plan for Li nton Boulevard, from I -95 to Federal Highway, from FY08/09 to FY10/11. x Privately -initiated: Future Land Use Element – Modification of the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify specific uses and intensities (FARs) for development within a proposed overlay di strict for the Lintco property on the north side of Linton Boulevard, west of SW 4 th Avenue. x City -ini tiated : Housing Element - Deletion of Policy B -3.3 (Completed). x City -initiated : Transportation Element - Modification of Policy A -1.8 to extend the time frame for investigation of the feasibility of implementin g an impact fee or other system for assessment of new development to fund operation of the downtow n roundabout shuttle service from FY08/09 to FY10/11. x City -initiated : Transportation Element - Modification of Objective A -8 to extend the time frame for development of a program to encourage str eet trees for green linkages from FY08/09 to FY10/11. x City -initiated : Transportation Element - Modification of Policy D -2.4 to extend the time frame for adoption of a bicycle network plan for the city from FY09/10 to FY11/12. x City -initiated : Transportation Element - Modification of Policy D -3.1 to extend the time frame for completion of surveys and analysis to determine the issues and needs for employer based TDM activities, including but not limited to ride sharing, van pooling, and flexible work hours, from FY09/1 0 to FY10/11. x City -initiated : Transportation Element - Modification of Policy D -3.5 to extend the time frame to determine the operational feasibility and grant funding requirements necessary to provide shuttle service to meet and greet all trains at the st ation from FY08/09 to FY10/11. FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT S: x City -initiated Future Land Use Map amendment to assign a City Future Land Use Map designation concurrently with the annexation of “Th e Marketplace of Delray”, containing approximately 30.26 acres of property located at th e northwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail. The current County Land Use Map designation is CH/8 (Commercial High with an underlying Residential of 8 units per acre) and the proposed City designation is GC (General Commercial). P&Z Board Staff Report - July 19, 20 10 IV.A. Transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2 010 -1 Page 3 x City -initiated Future Land Use Map amendment to assign a City Future Land Use Map designation concurrently with the annexation of Lot s 5 -7 of the “Breezy Acres” subdivision, containing approximately 2.5 acres of property loca ted on the east side of Markland Lane, 491 feet south of West Atlantic Avenue. The current County Land Use Map designation is MR -5 (Medium Density Residential, 5 units per acre) an d the proposed City designation is LD (Residential Low Density 0 -5 du/ac). x Privately -i nitiated Future Land Use Map amendment for the appr oximate 7.08 acre Lintco property located on the north side of Linton Boulev ard, west of SW 4th Avenue, from MD (Residential Medium Density 5 -12 du/acre) to GC (General Commercial). REVIEW BY OTHERS Cour tesy Notices: Courtesy notices were provided to the following hom eowner and civic associations: Neighborhood Advisory Council Letters of objection and support, if any, will be p rovided at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION By m otion, recommend that the City Commission transmit proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010 -1 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Attachment s: x Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 20 10 -1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: AUGUST 16, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: IV.A. RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION REGARDING TRANSMITTAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2010 -1. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is that of recommending t o the City Commission transmittal of additional items as part of Comprehensive Plan Amen dment 2010 -1 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS By Florida State Statutes, the City is allowed to p rocess two Comprehensive Plan amendments each year. The 2010 -1 amendment, initiated by the City Commission on Ju ly 6, 2010, included two (2) city -initiated Future Land Use Map Amendments, nineteen (19) city -initiated text amendments, one (1) privately -initiated Future Land Use Map Amendment and one (1) privately -initiated text amendment. It is noted that two (2) of the city -initiated text amendments were subsequently deleted. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the Amendmen t on July 19, 2010 and recommended transmittal, with the exce ption of the Breezy Acres FLUM amendment, which was tabled until its meeting of Au gust 16, 2010. O n August 3, 2010 , the City Commission initiated several additional items to be included as part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010 -1. T he additional items include d three (3) city - initiated text amendments , one (1 ) privately -initiated text amendment and one (1 ) privately - initiated Future Land Use Map Amendment . The additional items, together with the tabled Breezy Acres FLUM Amendment, are now before the Planning and Zoning Board for recommendation. A brief description of each item is listed below: TEXT AMENDMENTS x City -initiated: Capital Improvement Element - Update the General Fund Revenue and Expenditure 5 -Year Forecast Table . x City ini tiated: Capital Improvement Element - Update the Pledgeable Revenue Matrix Table . x City -initiated: Capital Improvement Element - Update the Debt Summary Table . x Privately -initiated: Future Land Use Element – Modification of the description of the GC (Gene ral Commercial) Future Land Use designation to iden tify specific uses and intensities (FARs) for development within a proposed overlay di strict for Waterford located east of I -95, south of Linton Boulevard. FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT S: x City -initiated Future Land Use Map amendment to assign a City Futu re Land Use Map designation concurrently with the annexation of Lot s 5 -7 of the “Breezy Acres” subdivision, containing approximately 2.5 acres of property loca ted on the east side of Markland Lane, P&Z Board Staff Report - August 16, 2010 IV.A. Transmittal of Additional items with Comprehe nsive Plan Amendment 2010 -1 Page 2 491 fe et south of West Atlantic Avenue. The current Count y Land Use Map designation is MR -5 (Medium Density Residential, 5 units per acre) an d the proposed City designation is LD (Residential Low Density 0 -5 du/ac). x Privately -initiated Future Land Use Map amend ment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial) for a 4.58 acre parcel located within W aterford, east of I -95, south of Linton Boulevard. REVIEW BY OTHERS Courtesy Notices: Courtesy notices were provided to the following hom eowner and civic as sociations: Neighborhood Advisory Council The City has received letters of objection to the B reezy Acres Annexation/FLUM Amendm e nt , which are attached with the s taff report for that item. Additional letters of objecti on and support, if any, will be provided at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION By motion, recommend that the City Commission add t he items contained in this staff report to Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2010 -1 and transmit the Amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Attachment s: x Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 20 10 -1 with applicable support documents.