04-03-12 Regular MeetingAgenda_Meeting[1].pdf
Regular Commission Meeting RULES FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Tuesday, April 3, 2012 Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m. Public Hearings 7:00 p.m. Delray Beach City Hall 1. PUBLIC COMMENT: The public
is encouraged to offer comments with the order of presentation being as follows: City Staff, public comments, Commission discussion and official action. City Commission meetings are
business meetings and the right to limit discussion rests with the Commission. Generally, remarks by an individual will be limited to three minutes or less. The Mayor or presiding officer
has discretion to adjust the amount of time allocated. A. Public Hearings: Any citizen is entitled to speak on items under this section. B. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items
from the Public: Any citizen is entitled to be heard concerning any matter within the scope of jurisdiction of the Commission under this section. The Commission may withhold comment
or direct the City Manager to take action on requests or comments. C. Regular Agenda and First Reading Items: Public input on agendaed items, other than those that are specifically set
for a formal public hearing, shall be allowed when agreed by consensus of the City Commission. 2. SIGN IN SHEET: Prior to the start of the Commission Meeting, individuals wishing to
address public hearing or non-agendaed items should sign in on the sheet located on the right side of the dais. If you are not able to do so prior to the start of the meeting, you may
still address the Commission on an appropriate item. The primary purpose of the sign-in sheet is to assist staff with record keeping. Therefore, when you come up to the podium to speak,
please complete the sign-in sheet if you have not already done so. 3. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION: At the appropriate time, please step up to the podium and state your name and address
for the record. All comments must be addressed to the Commission as a body and not to individuals. Any person making impertinent or slanderous remarks or who becomes boisterous while
addressing the Commission shall be barred by the presiding officer from speaking further, unless permission to continue or again address the Commission is granted by a majority vote
of the Commission members present. APPELLATE PROCEDURES Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered
at this meeting, such person will need to ensure that a verbatim record includes the testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal is based. The City neither provides nor prepares such record. 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 Phone: (561) 243-7000 Fax: (561) 243-3774 The City will furnish auxiliary
aids and services to afford an individual with a disability an opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Contact
Doug Smith at 243-7010, 24 hours prior to the event in order for the City to accommondate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers.
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. INVOCATION 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG A. NONE 4. AGENDA APPROVAL 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A. March 20, 2012 -Regular Meeting 6. PROCLAMATIONS:
A. Paralyzed Veterans Association (PVA) Awareness Month – April 2012 B. Earth Month – April 2012 7. PRESENTATIONS: A. NONE 8. CONSENT AGENDA: City Manager Recommends Approval A. RIGHT-OF-WAY
DEED/WAYSIDE HOUSE: Accept the dedication of 2’ of alley right-of-way for Wayside House, located at 328-378 N.E. 6th Avenue. B. REQUEST FOR A SIDEWALK DEFERRAL AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT
AGREEMENT/720 NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD: Approve a sidewalk easement and sidewalk deferral agreement for the property located at 720 North Ocean Boulevard along the north side of Crestwood
Drive to allow future construction of a sidewalk, for a proposed new single family residence within the North Beach Overlay
District. C. CONTRACT CLOSEOUT (CHANGE ORDER NO. 3/FINAL)/INTERCOUNTY ENGINEERING, INC./OSCEOLA PARK WATER MAIN PHASE 2 PROJECT: Approve Contract Closeout (C.O. No. 3/Final) in the amount
of a $221,470.60 decrease and final payment in the amount of $11,900.44 to Intercounty Engineering, Inc., for completion of the Osceola Park Water Main Phase 2 Project. Funding is available
from 442-5178-536-65.85 (W & S Renewal & Replacement Fund: Other Improvements/Osceola Park). D. CHANGE ORDER NO. 2/FOSTER MARINE CONTRACTORS, INC.: Approve Change Order No. 2 to Foster
Marine Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $20,991.00 for additional concrete sidewalk and driveway removal and replacement; and for a contract time extension of six (6) days for Auburn
Avenue Improvements. Funding to be paid out of the contract's Unforeseen Conditions Allowance. E. SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 07-17.2/MATHEWS CONSULTING, INC./RECLAIMED WATER EXPANSION
– AREA 12A: Approve Service Authorization No. 07-17.2 to Mathews Consulting, Inc. in the amount of $33,146.00 for additional professional engineering services in the design of Area 12A
Reclaimed Water System. Funding is available from 441-5161-536-68.73 (Water and Sewer Fund: Improvements Other/Reclaim Water, Area 12A). F. REJECTION OF ALL BIDS/DELRAY BEACH HEIGHTS
SWALE PROJECT: Approve a recommendation to reject all bids received for the Delray Beach Heights Swale Project and authorize staff to rebid the project with a modified scope. G. AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO THE LICENSE AGREEMENT/PREP AND SPORTS, INC.: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the License Agreement with Prep and Sports, Inc. to extend the term for an additional two (2) years for
their use of a portion of the Soccer Complex. H. HOUSING REHABILITATION GRANT/CONTRACT AWARD: Award one (1) Housing Rehabilitation contract through the Neighborhood Services Division
and Residential Construction Mitigation Program (RCMP) to the lowest responsive bidder, Cordoba Construction Co., for 318 S.E. 5th Street in the amount of $31,065.20. Funding is available
from 118-1924-554-49.19 (Neighborhood Services: Other Current Charges/Housing Rehabilitation) and 118-1936-554-49.19 (Neighborhood Services: Other Current Charges/Housing Rehabilitation).
I. RESOLUTION NO. 20-12: Approve establishing a revised investment policy which will set forth investment objectives and parameters for the management of public funds (excluding pension
funds, trust funds and funds related to debt issuance) of the City. J. SPECIAL EVENT REQUEST/14th ANNUAL CINCO DE MAYO FIESTA: Approve a special event request to allow the 14th Annual
Cinco De Mayo Fiesta to be held Saturday, May 5, 2012, from 2:00 p.m. – 10:00 p.m., on the grounds of Old School Square and in Old School Square Park, to authorize staff support for
traffic control and security, trash removal, EMS assistance, Fire inspection, signage preparation and
installation, and to approve use of the Old School Square parking garage for vendors and staff and use of a City generator; contingent on the receipt of a certificate of liability insurance
and liquor liability insurance fourteen (14) days prior to the event. K. REVIEW OF APPEALABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT BOARD ACTIONS: Accept the actions and decisions made by the Land Development
Boards for the period March 19, 2012 through March 30, 2012. L. AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS: 1. Bid award to multiple vendors at an estimated cost of $126,000.00 for the purchase of
medical/drug supplies for the City of Delray Beach Fire and Ocean Rescue and Highland Beach. Funding is available from various Fire-Rescue and Ocean Rescue budget accounts. 9. REGULAR
AGENDA: A. APPEAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPEARANCE BOARD ACTION: DELRAY INN, INC.: Consider an appeal of the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board’s decision regarding the Class III
site plan modification request and landscape plan for Delray Inn, Inc., located at 297 N.E. 6th Avenue. (Quasi-Judicial Hearing) B. CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST/DELRAY GAS STATION: Consider
approval of a conditional use request for Delray Gas Station (formerly known as Valero Gas Station) to allow the re-establishment of the gasoline station with attendant food sales, at
14111 South Military Trail. (Quasi-Judicial Hearing) C. WAIVER REQUESTS/SW DELRAY ONE, LLC.: Consider approval of four (4) waiver requests to Land Development Regulations (LDR) to allow
9 ft. floor to ceiling height for the rooftop pavilion where 10 ft. is required pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13 (F)(1)(b), to allow 8’11” and 13’0” ft. stacking distances where a 50 ft.
stacking distance is required for parking lots with 51 or more spaces pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), to allow 50% frontage at a maximum setback of 10 ft. along SE 1st Avenue
where 70%-90% is required pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(1), to allow 11.59% frontage at a minimum setback of 15 ft. for heights above 25’ along SE 1st Avenue where 70% is required,
and to allow 76% of the ground level floor area for floor levels above 25’ where a 70% maximum is allowed pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(2) for the proposed Saxena White Corporate
Office located at 111 S.E. 1st Avenue. (Quasi-Judicial Hearing) D. RESOLUTION NO. 21-12/DELRAY BEACH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND: Consider approval of Resolution No. 21-12 which recognizes
the importance of economic opportunities within city boundaries, establishes the Delray Beach Economic Development Fund to provide matching funds for various State economic development
incentives and provide an effective date. E. REQUEST DIRECTION ON THE CONVERSION OF S.E. 1ST STREET: Provide direction on the implementation schedule for the conversion of S.E. 1st Street
to twoway traffic from S.E. 1st Avenue to S.E. 6th Avenue.
F. REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF REGULARLY SCHEDULED CITY COMMISSION MEETING DATES: Review and discuss an alternate date for the January 1, 2013 Regular Meeting and provide direction on whether
to schedule the January 29, 2013 Annual Citizen's Roundtable. G. REVISED VALET PARKING LICENSE AGREEMENTS: Approve modifications contained in the proposed Valet Parking License Agreements.
H. OFFER OF SETTLEMENT IN VINCENT GRAY v. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH AND RALPH PHILLIPS: Consider an Offer of Settlement in the total amount of $175,000.00 in Gray v. City of Delray Beach
and Ralph Phillips. Staff recommends denial. I. APPOINTMENT TO THE PUBLIC ART ADVISORY BOARD: Appoint one (1) regular member to the Public Art Advisory Board to serve an unexpired term
ending July 31, 2013. Based upon the rotation system, the appointment will be made by Commissioner Jacquet (Seat #2). J. APPOINTMENT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL: Appoint one
(1) regular member from Zone 2 to the Neighborhood Advisory Council to serve an unexpired term ending July 31, 2014. Based on the rotation system, the appointment will be made by Commissioner
Gray (Seat #4). K. APPOINTMENT TO THE CHARTER REVISION COMMITTEE: Appoint the Chairperson to the Charter Revision Committee. The appointment will be made by Mayor McDuffie (Seat #5).
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. ORDINANCE NO. 05-12: Consider a privately-initiated Future Land Use Map change from Transitional (TRN) to General Commercial (GC), rezoning from POC (Planned
Office Center) to PC (Planned Commercial), and a Text Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan modifying the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to limit
the maximum FAR to 0.46 for a 9.95 acre property located on the southeast corner of Linton Boulevard and Federal Highway (1801 and 1845 South Federal Highway) known as Delray Place.
(Quasi-Judicial Hearing) (THIS ITEM IS A CONTINUATION FROM THE MARCH 20, 2012 PUBLIC HEARING; IT IS NOT OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS) B. ORDINANCE NO. 09-12: Consider a city-initiated amendment
to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Appendix “A”, “Definitions”, to expand the definition of “Restaurant (Bona Fide)”, to clarify required operations and components for restaurant
uses. C. ORDINANCE NO. 10-12: Consider a city-initiated amendment to the Land Development Regulations (LDR) Appendix “A”, “Definitions”, to provide a definition of “Delicatessen”, Section
4.6.9, “Off-Street Parking Regulations”, and Article 6.3, “Use and Work in the Public Right of Way”, Subsection 6.3.3, “Sidewalk Café”, to provide a definition, clarify required parking,
and to clarify the characteristics of a
Delicatessen. 11. COMMENTS AND INQUIRIES ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS FROM THE PUBLICIMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. City Manager's response to prior public comments and inquiries.
B. From the Public. 12. FIRST READINGS: A. ORDINANCE NO. 14-12: Consider a Future Land Use Map amendment (small-scale) from CMR (Commerce) to TRN (Transitional), rezoning from LI (Light
Industrial) to NC (Neighborhood Commercial) and text amendment to the General Commercial Land Use Description for 10th & 10th Center, located at the southeast corner of S.W. 10th Street
and S.W. 10th Avenue. If passed, a public hearing will be held on April 17, 2012. 13. COMMENTS AND INQUIRIES ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS: A. City Manager B. City Attorney C. City Commission
! "#$%"&'()%%* %! (+,*%-%-) ./%0#$%",#)!,1 *%& $1%#".*))! 1 """ 2"!*)/%*+ 3 $!1% !"#$"%#&'#()'&("#*'+###("4 ")) "))) "##,--''$","#"! %%.1 ))1 "%%3)1 !(%)567%.567%0567567%56%$
) !81%./01!*%01 ))19.)": "%.%3)1 !(%.567%0567567%567%)56%$ ) !81%
%)1 ))1' "%0%3)1 !(%0567567%567%)567%.56%$ ) !81%21!*2#23'#$',"##-4'" ) )"))91% $"; +.01!9! )) 1!"%2)/"'5,"#6'"(#-4'" ) )"))&%<=)1! ))%7!11!*%#8!1* ))1%890!1/!3:/;2!11*))14 !. +
'+ %8)!11;!3<*))1 )!$9;<<%! )!)",,!$>9); $%/%1%811!01=;/>;3!1!101;31:1?1*))1?%;%#%@ABCD%8 )AB8C%:89=%)9+.=)1+E% 1"D,:,8D,'C%B?=)(;=)19+.=)1@%
81!/!0<!01!!*))1!1F=%-%<1F=%90)=% F9=% 11%8!01@*<=>1;/11/1!11=/1>;/3<)01/1?1*))1#%B,G><+?<+@! )*)?;*@ &!)E%*)#%B,!(/$;<3*=;#;*&/=*6;=$$=;#;*&/=*6;/<6/&<;=3*&;=H=#0*&/+;+/=*6;==<$*;/I/3*/<;<0/#6+;0?<
+@0///#*9=*&*&/$**/;<;=/+*/#*;*#$+;**=;#*;+;J=/;*&//+*/#*K$+*==+*=;#=#=<<=#0#/$3=#0;/;#$*3*=#0+;*=;#$;3$$,8;$;3*&;&;$=/=J/*;;#96?+;-/*;#$=$*=#0;<#$+=#0<=0&*=#0#=#;=#0/=+;J//#*$@#/$3=#0;#*<#*=J/#3/;$;
3*&;3#3$,*;#;*&;3#3$,9=*&=#*&/=*6;/<6/&7+;J==#0;;#<=*$7+;J==#0#//*=J/*/%?*)#%B,.K%@8/1!1111!;)11A1=>*G"*)/+0+)+)+;G?+;@" !.&! 1 ; 0! <!1 %81;!1</)01<*))1"! < $+G) )1 1#" ?#@%
:8111/011;!!1<11=>;)01<*))1 "! +1=1&"+?=@+>)! %8!190!1;!)/!1*))1)14; $") "; $$4)) " ):()%%C()%% ; $$4 ; $$4+.7 G)))11 1 ).; $$407))<"=<"= & &")8%8?!190!1;.10313<)/1/!1*))1)14 8!!1)
"&! /1< %" ',D(%%8()%%)))<$%:%'?@ #%9% 11 01! *). #).&7 )1 )) " )1%8:3/)1)1!*) "< 1) ) 8'%83/)!11!*+! )1 AB:%?@)17 ! /J$))A'8D%) 4)?:@+)1 2) /4)AC8D%?@." 4)% 1"8,,8B,':%?0 (/4)1@%%.1
))1 "%0%3)1 !(567%567%)567%.567%056%$ ) !81%
80*/!13)1*<* ))$+1! )) K ===) 4 ))==% BD#%/%'1%%1 ))=B%%) "%.%3)1 !(567%567%)567%.567%056%$ ) !81%)390!1!;.1!11* ))1!?@!14< 1)?<@$:%8%?/@?@?@%%L 9M)'K!". < 1)?<@$:%'%:?@L$J"*M 1"
1!!,,!'K>'K K>CK! !K>K1"4 )) #%/%8$% N, - & "4N,- %1%#".! 1 !! 1%. >)%* >) %+=++ H + H))EO,D %% !!14 !!)) #%/%8$,= +.&%*!1)'" ))!8))%>:) !!".%% ' !" :8".))%* !1 1" 1! %& 4 "" !
"C! '"' %*!!1! "&+1 ?&+@))))?;@ ! ) %% 4 <
'$%:%D?@?8@ )%*))4 !18)1 )1 '8".))!)1 )1 E))! 1" %$"11!1" ")) %$))"!1%B'C".-!''+)(-/ ))!1 "1 ))" %%;K# )1"!"1! "&+1 % )"! .).1))!14)! %*!>"%%). !1"K )) %%;K# ))8! ) ) ! "> 1!))%%;K#
1 "" > 1!1 1!"! !%%;K#>) 1)) " !))! "))1 !%%). !".%% ". ! > '8 ! ):%*"1! ; !! ? ) )@%%01 ) ; "%%3)1 !(%567%)567%.567%056756%$ ) !81%!018@;1!11* "1))1!P %*)#%C,!(/$;<3*=;#;*&/=*6;=$$=;#;*
&/=*6;/<6/&<;=
D/$*<=$&=#0&*//J=$=;#;=**//;*&/$;</+3+;$/;/J=/9=#0*&/=*6P$&*/#;3<*=#0/;/#*=;#$*;*&/=*6;=$$=;#%?*)#%C,.K%@* 41 ! "1?@"%& ! ))!"!)) %* ! $)"%&!1 > ) "> "%%)1 ))1#%C, "%.%3)1 !(%)567%.567%0567567
%56%$ ) !81%11!11//)0!!<11*))1?8@"1 - ?:@"1 - "& 1% ))?$O@.?$O@0?$O:@ ?$O8@!.!?@))7?$O@!.?@))%%)1 ))& "& 11>) - "%.%3)1 !(%.567%0567567%567%)56%$ ) !81%%.1 )).9 "& 11>) - "%0%3)1
!(%0567567%567%)567%.56%$ ) !81%%01 ))$ "& 11>) - "%.%3)1 !(567%567%)567%.567%056%$ ) !81%
C ! .))+ "&1>) -%%)1 "%.%3)1 !(%567%)567%.567%056756%$ ) !81%%1 ))/1" "&1>) - "%)%3)1 !(%)567%.567%0567567%56%$ ) !81%%)1 ))" "&1>) - "%%3)1 !(%.567%0567567%567%)56%$ ) !81%%.1
)) "&1>) - "%0%3)1 !(%0567567%567%)567%.56%$ ) !81%%01 ))H "&1>) - "%.%3)1 !(567%567%)567%.567%056%$ ) !81% ! .))$$ "&1>) -%%1 "%)%3)1 !(%567%)567%.567%056756%$ ) !81%1111)!<0*))?@"H1>)
-:#" 1% ))!" "0?$O:@%%0 ! . ))>)%
B/11110)1!<)*))?@"+" 1 1>) -% )))!" "?$O@%%1))+" 1 "1>) - "%.%3)1 !($ ) !81%1111/3)*))?@"1! 1>) -% )))!" "?$O@%%1 )) 1! ?@"1>) - "%0%3)1 !(%.567%0567567%567%)56%$ ) !81%11!111311())1?@"1!%
)))!"!?$O@)?$O@.?$O@0?$O:@ ?$O8@!)))%* )) .!!")17!1 )"))) " ))!)B%%1 ))0/) "! 11! "%)%3)1 !(%.567%0567567%567%)56%$ ) !81%%)1 ))1 $ 2"E1! "%%3)1 !(%0567567%567%)567%.56%$ ) !81%
%.1 ))$+ .1! "%%3)1 !(567%567%)567%.567%056%$ ) !81%%01 ))" 1! "%.%3)1 !(%567%)567%.567%056756%$ ) !81% ! )).)" 1!%%1 "%.%3)1 !(%)567%.567%0567567%56%$ ) !81% ! ))))%)"'(B)%%1
/"',&"#6,/!1!*@* , < 1)?<@)) >LMLM>) L? @M4 ) )%=) )"!" )%*); #%B,!(#;=##/;*&/=*6;=$$=;#;*&/=*6;/<6/&<;=/#=#0*&/<#/J/<;+/#*/03<*=;#$;*&/;/;;=##/$6/#=#0++/#=IQQQ/=#=*=;#$Q*;/I+#*&//=#=*=;#;L/$*3#*?;
#=/@M*;<=6/N3=/;+/*=;#$#;+;#/#*$;/$*3#*3$/$+;J==#00/#/</+/</<3$/$J=#0<3$/##//*=J/*/%?*); #%B,.K%@* ) %
+=++ H , <>) %% """ !!!))1 1 ," "1%& !1"1"))1 ,"1 4 <%% ">) ! 4"1" 1 )%% , "1 4" %& "41"1""1"1 )%D+))01$1! ))1"E ! !1")1 )1?%%" %@%% ")1! /;%& "!17!1 1 .! ! !!
%% ")"!1!" !1 !>"%"D+ H 1! ))1!:17" 1)?@ .!! ,"7"!!1)?@ ))1 4 " . " )! E %% %%) 1" E "1 !41!1%% 1 ). %
% "1 " . ! 4)(%%% 4 ") ," ))1 ,"")(%% 11%%%0 "1 " " ""%%. . %% L 1"R %% 1 " 11 " 1 )%% !1"1" " % ))1. 1 )!" !%& .!"))1. 1K 1 %% 1))"!."!"%% %%. ..)(:8%%!(:(%%"1)
)!%%) ) "1 !"" !!" 1!!!".!%%0 !%) 1 ) "% ) 11 )))%
%1 ))1; #%B,=$* "%0%3)1 !(%.5#7%0567567%567%)56%$ ) !:1. %)@* , < 1)?<@)) >LMLM)1 LM$:%'%BL;,$+.M '%L3 9.+"9M$"'%%L$ !.RM)1 4 ). %=) )"!" )%*); #%B,!(#;=##/;*&/=*6;=$$=;#;*&/=*6;/<6/&<;=/#=#0*&/
<#/J/<;+/#*/03<*=;#$;*&/;/;;=##/$6/#=#0++/#=ILML/=#=*=;#$M6/#*=#0#/9/=#=*=;#;L/<=*/$$/#M76/#=#0:%'%BL;$*//*+2=#0/03<*=;#$M$3$/*=;#?@?@?@L/$*3#*$M7#$/*=;#'%%?@L/03<*=;#$0;J/#=#0*&/3$//$=0##=#*/##/;$=/
9<2SM*;<=6+2=#0/N3=//#*$#$=/9<2S;+;#/#*$;/<=*/$$/#$#$==<3$/$7+;J==#0$J=#0<3$/0/#/</+/</<3$/##//*=J/*/%?*); #%B,.K%@* ) %+=+ , <).4 ! !.R)"G )1 ! %% !.R" "" !., ).4%& ! !.R!
)")%% !)")!). ) )1 !!!!)")
:".9+.%& .,! !.R .,%% 1 !.R.,)1 !1%=)1 !1. ")1 ). !%D+))01$1! ))17"D+ H 1! ))1!:17" 1)?@ ))17"!!1)?@ ))1 . 1 ). !.,! ! 4%$ ))1%%.4 ! L M%% 1 ).4%%. )%%01
))1; #%,=$* "%%3)1 !(%0567567%567%)567%.56%$ ) !81%)"'(88)%%1 "+#6'C,',#,'"'5B"((#,#&"#D5"'","+#6'C,',#,'"'5B"((#,#&"#D5"'",* )))" 4%1!90!@1!"+#6'* 2E.")) 0!+ 1)+;G?+;@%$ 4 "
) >) !! 1%$ 1) 1 .). !1" )! ! / %*
8 )) 1"!! / )"1 1! %& )A8%) %9 0K"1! / " )(%%<"%< 1)) $ &!+ )"%* G)+ H) " ! 1 %"+",,"#'/'#E%. "+J4 !1:)1 % )1) !1! %)"D()%%1 1 +"&) %0)!*.@* )1, < 3)*?*#@0?0@G+;?+ ;@+?+ @
*> )1+ )0?0@< 3 >%:'B%B8)) <1 &!?C C:8$ &!@.!+%*); #%8,!(#;=##/;*&/=*6;=$$=;#;*&/=*6;/<6/&<;=;+*=#0$<<,$</;+/&/#$=J/+<#/#/#*+3$3#**;*&/+;J=$=;#$;*&/L;3#=*6+<##=#0*M<;=$**3*/$$/*=;#'%CD
'=#<3=#0$<<,$</3*3/<#3$/+/#/#*;*#?*#$=*=;#<@*;0?0/#/<;/=<@;<#<;*/**&/$;3*&/$*;#/;<=#*;#;3</J#$;3*&//<&=0&96$;/+*=3<<6/$=/&//=###$$;=*/*/I*/#/#*;=6=#0*&//$=+*=;#;*&/0?0/#/<;/=<@3*3/<#3$//$=0#*=;#+/*=#
=#0*;$=<#7#/H;#=#0#+<=#0$=<#+/$/#*<6H;#/+;?+<##/;=//#*/@*;+?+<##/;/=<@=$*=*7/#=#0QH;#=#0+;/<6/&<;=-#36Q7+;J==#00/#/</+/</<3$/$J=#0<3$/##//*=J/*/%?*); #%8,.K%@* ) %)"! 1" 1 )!!$ %+=++
H + H))EO,8C O,8B %% )1 ) < 3) *?*#@0?0@ G+;?+ ;@+?+ @ > )0)1+ > 1)?@B%B8) $%/%<1 &!?C C:8$ &!@.!+%% " ") ". !!))%"D! "+ H " %% K 11 ))) ))%& !")" "%% 4 + H)%$ ))1%%
))!
D8! 1) !! "*)= ,T %$!))1 )) " %% ) """ , )!)%% )) )1!!!"! "1)))%$ ))1G > %"E$"'" "&#&##' !+)0) !)))%%1 +)0)"! 14))$ %& )) !1! 1" )<4 1" ")!4 )1 )" %*4.))) G%%1"1! 1!)) " %%1
))% )"! .).1))4)! %:"/'#',"&# -1'"(,"$"(,,(""#,E"#6#B- -)'& "'(', -,,(""#'',#"#6-5,,"#6 "+%' '#-,"#1'"(, )) 1)$ &!%% $ &! 1)+!1")D K0$$") %$ $)"C9, ! !4G%2)+ *) !.$ &! 1)+") 1).
)%$ %% 0 E ! !%% " "G " E%$ ))1$ &! 1)+"G %/'&/F'$'6'#'"$'+)(-/8 D$+$ ) 1))$ &!%%G ))" " *)= 1%& !))" " 4)" %%G 4""! 1) *)=%
C-'","#''",#8/'"&)5$'&G7'+)(-/8='("'B+1'&'("''+#,5##&',"&# 1'"(,> " ) )" G""". )> " %% %''+/'#(",$!''+)(-/8=,E"#6,B' -##"#6#&A#"#6)'&#,&-"$,"#1'"(,> + "!+ H K!!. " !).")1!))%%
!"!! .!+ H%% .+ )+ H "+)1%& )) ) " " ")"G%% )) + ;?+;@+?+ @0?0@1 %% + H .!1))"11" !))%& 11 )!!"1 ! . "1" )).%% 1 ). " ! ). %& !. )"%!1!!).%% !!"!). .!%1''+',"+8/'"&)5$'&G'+)(-/8=1'"()+)'&
B'> :831 E ) .")%%+ ! "! "G ) 1!%& ) ) )))>BCB !. %%+ 1$ %& >) ")).1) " +%%+ !!.)) G%%+ + ! "!"%
B?-#:#"6.2$'6'#'"$'+)(-/8=',"&#,"#(> 1 0*. >) "1G)$ &!%%2 "!1" %& $ -$+1"" $ %%2 !))!" "%& > )))" 1 ))>!") ))%%2 < 3)). . ")!$+))1" )) )")E*)= ") ))%%2 ))1 . "1! .$ &!%"(-'&#'$!''+)(-/8=1'"(,>
" !! 1) ) G%%J0 ! G E))! G ")")1 ""!" " %%J0 !))G!.!! ) E)))%%J0 ))))4 %& ))4 ". ". ))0?0@G )1 "" " """">%& ) " ".G))+;?+ ;@) " " 0?0@G%%J0 1LMG%& G! "1 " 1LMG%)'#6#'+("#-'"$'+)(-/8=1'"(,>
!1 "!" ,8 "1 1,",, %& %% !*)=LM 1)"LM 1)%& !+ &!%?+#:"#6(#(+'+)(-/.='',#"#6-'+""F#,""#,"'('> G)$ &! 1)+ %
*")"!! ; #%8,)"! %*!>%%%1 ;1))1 !K>%& "";1 . );1 K )))%%1 1!;11) !!;1" %& +!"%%1 .;1 " 1)) !1! !G 1! %%). ))!!4!" %&. * $G1"%% "1$G )"! )1+%%) ))". *?*#@) !$G! >!))!.. !!"%%
$K%% )))1))) G !! !%& !)G %%) "))G$G))!%*%) " !))%% ! 1.1) %& )1)+1))1" ! !))1! "%% "! !"%& 4")" " "%%!>) "%) !))%%0 "-- ""! %$ "" ""+ #!$!+ !1 +%%0 .)$ &! %$!>) "%)
%
%.. 1 1%&>) !+ H ")) )! !81 ! ..!!! 1"%= %. !!!))1 + H ))!." 1 1" %%. )"D +G ))!)) ! %%. < 3/;"E1,!L))" 1) 1) ) E %)"! E!" $+1!) 4 G+;?+;@+?+ @) 1)> %%. "1 .!)%%. $?@?@?@
G$ !))"4G! ! )"! E " %& $%:%8?@?8@?"@"!.G))) ?@4 G! < 3) )))))" )))" %%. < 3)!7 " %%. " < ))) !%% )! !1 G! )! " )) 1"% !!. "!!)" !!K%& "! 1 ! 1% 1" 1"!%& !1".""!"% ! "))
G 4). )." "% "!. !!)) 1)1 %& !)41".% ))))")) " "" .)!>" ))!% 1
"" % )) %%1 "$G ! .)))!1%%) %1 !$%% .<")".G ! ".!G>%% ! "G%& "".!G4 ! ! G"!.%* "))! 1)) "! 1 )"%% ! G<L!1 ))G ))?@ ))G)))) ?"@ )). G)))) >%M*. ))" "))%% $G44" ) " !%*
))!! ! ! "1!))).1%*))4 !!. 1 !.!!.!)"1E1%+1 )" ; #%8, !")" )" %%1 )); #%8, )D()%% "%0%3)1 !(567%567%)567%.5#7%056%$ ) !:1. %
)@* , < 1)?<@$C%8%L/"+"+M$"?@L))))=)1+E?=+ @M ))) K" %*); #%,!(#;=##/;*&/=*6;=$$=;#;*&/=*6;/<6/&<;=/#=#0*&/<#/J/<;+/#*/03<*=;#$;*&/=*6;/<6/&<;=6/#=#0$/*=;#C%8%L/$*<=$&/#*;+3<=*$+;0M$3$/*=;#?@L++;+=*
=;#;+=*<=+;J//#*+;-/*?=+3#$@M$/**=#0;*&*&/=*6K$=0&**;3$/++;+=*/3#$7+;J==#0$J=#0<3$/0/#/</+/</<3$/##//*=J/*/%?*); #%,.K%@* ) %)"! 1" 1 )!!$ % )")%+=++ H , +"+)<%& " +"+"81; #%DD,:%%
%8U"" 1)+"+%& " " 1)"!)1)E! %* ! +"+ "G )")"))!))) K" %"D+ H 1! !1")").)) !1 %$ ))1%
:!#&+/'#(",$!''+)(-/8=B' -5B"('&$",'+)'& '-,+',> )4!)E1 ")?%%" 9+)4@%%. ! 4))>A% >%BB",@B+5B"('&"#",'' '-"+ )+##)(- .+" %%," ) )" 1" ))%$ ") 1%%," )1)+"))") ) ! 1")!)1 )11%$> 1)+"+%#&)'''77E$#5
'-'+)(-/8 "!1 1".%&. "1 !!)).%% ". )%& !. ,) .!1)"%% !. ))1 E) !)11G ,)%& ". !! "1 %/'#E'6,(55''",#&# "',"#',-('+)(-"#7. !!.)"!1 " ! ".)""" !.))/) )! %%J .)"%##+E&#'"$)+##)(-/.=-"'
-'+)(-5B"('&$",'+)'&> )) !1#" 1?#@ 7!1"1+" 1 ) !)+"+%% + H ! %$ ! !K)1+ "1""K K+$ +K)1+)1)"%%
8 )) . ) %?5&+,+5B"('",#&%'E,5 )+##)(- "!!)) !"" 1 1 !)! "" 1%?,-56-,.'&#"1''('+)(-/='"'&"'"#"%"-'"(#"'"#, '.+',> 1 1! !".)E%%&. 1 $1 $%%& ) !! !) "!. . !) " %& %%& " %*")"!!
; #%,)"! %%. !*>- 1"1 )%%. $?@?@ L*!)))%8U"" 1 4 )!. )")!))) " %M%. " L"M !+"+! %* 1 . %* " %* "))E! )>%* +"+%%. !! !))%* ))! 1 ! A%?))>@%%0 +"+!"!%$ "1. ) !))))!!1
%%0 ))1 ) )>" ". %
'%!) %")%& )%% ! 1" " !%& 1 %& " %% .K! !. !! 1)!! "1"!))) " %% )) "!! >) ! 1%* E ! %%) 1 ! 1))1!)1)%& !14 "!1 ! 1 %%) 1 ))) ))!1 1"! "".! %%) ! )"% 1)" )A%%& 1).! !> !
!!!A%""" % !)) % E ! )G-)! !" ! )/>+%& !1$ />+! )$ />+!)"% " " )"! 1)) %& K)" )) AAB% ! 11 )" "! 1" !%%0. 1"+" 1 %* A!%+1% ".A!"%* %* ! " ! 1"%
D%)1 ))1; #%,=$* "%0%3)1 !(%567%)567%.5#7%056756%$ ) !:1. %!012@;11/!0!;!310!31!11* ))1#%', )G)) $%9%1 $%9%$9J<<))A8D8%%*)#%',!(/$;<3*=;#;*&/=*6;=$$=;#;*&/=*6;/<6/&<;=3*&;=H=#0*&/=*6*;$/<<*;36//*=
#/<+;+/*6=#+</&;3#*6<;=$/$=/&//=#&//6=#;+;*=#0#/+*=#0*&/;#**$**=#0*&/*/$#;#=*=;#$;*&/$</#+3&$//*9//#*&/36/#*&/=*6;/<6/&<;=%?*)#%',.K%@)"! 1" 1 )!!$ %* !)! E)) )1 )! 1))G !,, !! 7!1!
"%* ! 1 1 %* .))4! )D !1! ))))))K!"1 !)!%*)A8D8%% )")%
C?"A#665'(-,' -''+ /!. ,,!"8 1%-'","#''",#8/'"&)5$'&G7'+)(-/8. ))! %% "1 %*")"!! )"! %%1 ))1#%', "%)%3)1 !(%)567%.567%0567567%56%$ ) !81%)"B()%%1 )#,#&#D5"'",##@6#&, '-5B"()/'-5B"()"(-'&&,88
!:#&"'(E3'-/27=!-'B'E,,> :G ! 1"84%%< ! ))"C4"G%%< 1 1%&))! 1)))!! "))!.!1)%$ %< )1 0 $*<+ ! 8 )) =*))E1 !%& )3 $ ))!!1)!B)) 1:! )"%%< ).0 $*< )1))1%& ! :D)) & *%%< !
))! )%& !!. "! 8)) )>%%< " A
B"$""1).1!"1"$%& 1 A"$%%< .!")1) 1 1'C,'B 1))):8,B ! <))!1 9 9 !)!!1&%%< . ) 1E"%)'&/'#(",$!''+)(-/8 !)!! .%-) E"%% "9 )! .)" !1%& !..!") !) . "" !1").)" 1))!%$ % /-4%)"B()%%1 #,#&#D5"'",##@6#&,
'-"+'#+#&-', -"+",,"#)"+'#+* ! =)0?=0@!1 ! 1 !)) !"' )':!! 1 !)9+&?@"B(%%* "1" %& !"4. 1! %$ !"!!$ "!""") %"+",,"#','+%0 ! /-4%
''#+% /-4 .! !.!%$ % )! ! G! !)).) !!! ! !%% "1 )> 1))E! 1 1))E! 1".%& ! ".!"11! !1!%% $%+.K+ ! !)1!?%%%@''"#%) /-4%$ %) !1;GB%.+'(5 " $%+.K+ ! >1!)%& +. 111 ) E"% )! )%. 1!
$%+.K )" %& ! <"" !1 %*"" E B(C)%%VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV.
**/$*(VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV6;* . )1 !!))1 ) "VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV%VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV.11*=11 ) "1%*!"1! ))1!11 "1%
March 20, 2012 City Commission Meeting; Item 9.B.
March 20, 2012 City Commission Meeting; Item 9.B.
!!"#!!$%"!&'(!""!!#%"!!)#*)"+(!,-.%&'(!"!!*!!/&'("&&"01203&'(!"/!!"!!)*!!!!4 /!!!56&'("#70120
!"%!"!!!%!!""!%!8!"!'(!!4!!"4%!9'!"6!025668!4!"/&'("&&"3'(!!!56&'("#70120
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Amy E. Alvarez, Senior Planner Paul Dorling, AICP, Director of Planing and Zoning THROUGH: City Manager DATE: March 28, 2012 SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM 8.A. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED/WAYSIDE HOUSE ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION The action requested of the City Commission is acceptance of a right-of-way
deed associated with an approved addition and site improvements at 328 – 378 N.E. 6th Avenue, Wayside House. BACKGROUND At its meeting of February 22, 2012, the Site Plan Review and
Appearance Board (SPRAB) approved a Class III Site Plan Modification for the Wayside House, located at 328-378 NE 6th Avenue. The modification was for a 1,853 square foot building addition.
One of the conditions of approval was the recording of a right-of-way deed for the adjacent alley. The existing right-of-way width of the alley at the rear (west) of the property measures
16’ and the required width is 20’. Therefore, the applicant must dedicate 2’ (one-half of the 4’ additional right-ofway). This dedication is shown on the attached exhibit. RECOMMENDATION
By motion, accept the right-of-way deed for two feet of alleyway right-of-way associated with 328-378 NE 6thAvenue, Wayside House.
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: CANDI N. JEFFERSON, SENIOR PLANNER PAUL DORLING, AICP, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING THROUGH: CITY MANAGER DATE: March 28, 2012 SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM 8.B. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 SIDEWALK EASEMENT AND SIDEWALK DEFERRAL AGREEMENTS/720 NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION The action requested
of the City Commission is acceptance of sidewalk easement and sidewalk deferral agreements along the north side of Crestwood Drive associated with construction of a new single family
residence within the North Beach Overlay District known as the Kaiser Residence located at 720 North Ocean Boulevard. BACKGROUND The subject property is 0.4019 acresand is currently
vacant. It lies within the North Beach Overlay District and is located on the northwest corner of Crestwood Drive and North Ocean Boulevard at 720 North Ocean Boulevard. The property
is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-AAA) and the applicant proposes to construct a new three-story single family residence with a swimming pool. The owner wishes to provide a five
foot (5’) sidewalk easement adjacent to the right-of-way along the north side of Crestwood Drive to accommodate future construction of a sidewalk. No other sidewalks currently exist
on either side of Crestwood Drive. At its meeting of October 21, 2010, the Development Services Management Group (DSMG) supported the sidewalk easement. The DSMG also supported a sidewalk
deferral to avoid immediate construction of a sidewalk along Crestwood Drive. Pursuant to the attached agreements, the owner will provide a five feet (5’) sidewalk easement and construct
the sidewalk along Crestwood Drive at its sole cost and expense at a later date, after being requested to do so by the City. The agreements have been reviewed by the City Attorney and
have been approved as to form. RECOMMENDATION By motion, accept the sidewalk easement and sidewalk deferral agreements for 720 N. Ocean Boulevard.
such
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Rafael Ballestero, Deputy Director of Construction Richard C. Hasko, P.E., Director of Environmental Services THROUGH: David T. Harden,
City Manager DATE: March 19, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 8.C. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT (C.O. NO. 3)/FINAL)/INTERCOUNTY ENGINEERING, INC. ITEM BEFORE
COMMISSION This item is before the Commission to approve a Contract Closeout (Change Order No. 3/Final) in the net deduct amount of ($221,470.60) and a final payment amount of $11,900.44
to Intercounty Engineering, Inc. for completion of the Osceola Park WM Ph2 Project #2010-082. BACKGROUND The project generally consisted of the installation of approximately 5,340 LF
of 8 inch Ductile Iron Pipe water main, connection of water services, and installation of fire hydrants; including clearing and grubbing, sodded swale, asphalt trench repair, driveway
apron replacement, drainage, and maintenance of traffic. On October 4, 2011, Commission approved Change Order No. 1 for a contract time extension of seven (7) days, for additional work
required for relocation of the proposed water main, installation of a reverse tap, and repairs to the water main; for a total amount of $18,321.82; which was paid out of the contract's
Utility Allowance Line Item. On December 13, 2011, Commission approved additional scope for the removal of 2,000 LF of 2" water main in the amount of $16,000.00. This was requested in
lieu of abandonment in place to prevent conflicts with potential future capital project design and construction activities. This was paid out of the contract's Utility Allowance. On
February 2, 2012, Commission approved Change Order No. 2 for a contract time extension of fourteen (14) days to complete the work for removal of an additional 1,300 LF of 2" water main
at $8.00/LF for an amount of $10,400.00; to be paid out of the Contract's Utility Allowance. This is requested in lieu of abandonment in place to prevent conflicts with potential future
capital project design and construction activities. Change Order No. 3 includes plus and minus quantity adjustments and liquidates the residual from contingency allowances. All changes
for the project are itemized on the attached Schedule “A”. The
project is complete and all closeout documentation has been received. It is noted that the close out deduct amount returning to the City is substantially higher than normally anticipated
for typical capital infrastructure projects. This is the result of errors in the contract quantities which caused them to be overstated, and under construction field adjustments for
underground utility alignments that affected the types and quantities of surface restoration. FUNDING SOURCE Residual funds to be liquidated from Purchase Order #676211 to funding account
442-5178-536-65.85 (Water Sewer Renewal & Replacement Fund/Other Improvements/Osceola Park). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of a Contract Closeout (Change Order No. 3/Final)
in the net deduct amount of ($221,470.60) and final payment amount of $11,900.44 to Intercounty Engineering, Inc. for completion of the Osceola Park WM Ph2 Project.
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Rafeal Ballestero, Deputy Director of Construction Richard C. Hasko, P.E., Director of Environmental Services THROUGH: David T. Harden,
City Manager DATE: March 19, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 8.D. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2/FOSTER MARINE CONTRACTORS, INC. ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION This
item is before the Commission to approve Change Order No. 2 (CO #2) for a contract time extension of six (6) days; and approval, in the amount of $20,991.00, for additional concrete
sidewalk and driveway removal and replacement, to be paid out of the contract's Unforeseen Conditions Allowance, for the Auburn Ave. Improv. Project #2010-040. BACKGROUND On October
4, 2011, Commission approved a contract award and Change Order No. 1 in the total amount of $1,156,896.00 to Foster Marine Contractors, Inc. The project consists of Roadway and Infrastructure
Improvements on Auburn Avenue from SW 7th St. to SW 8th St.; SW 12th and SW 13th Ave. from SW 8th St. to SW 10th St.; SW 8th St. from SW 14th Ave. to SW 12th Ave.; and, SW 10th St. from
SW 14th Ave. to SW 12th Ave. The scope of the project includes roadway resurfacing and reconstruction, sidewalks, landscaping, design-build irrigation specifications, paver cross-walks,
drainage improvements, on street parking and bus shelters. In addition, new water and sewer infrastructure on SW 12th and 13 Ave. from SW 8th St. to SW 10th St., SW 8th St. from SW 14th
Ave. to SW 12th Ave., and SW 10th Street from SW 14th Ave. to SW 12th Ave. On March 9, 2012 the City Manager approved the cost of $6,625.68 associated with converting twelve (12) single
water services and twelve (12) single sewer services, to double services. The amount was paid out of the Contract's Unforeseen Conditions Allowance. Change Order No. 2 in the total amount
of $20,991.00 is for the removal of an additional 260 SY of concrete driveway and 315 LF of concrete sidewalk; and the installation of 310 LF of concrete sidewalk and 2,340 SF of concrete
driveway apron. This is required in order to properly match the plan elevations of the proposed roadway adjacent to the existing concrete driveways and represents an undefined activity
for which cost the unforeseen conditions allowance item is intended.. Attached, please find the cost details on Exhibit "A" to CO #2.
FUNDING SOURCE Cost to be funded out of the Contract's Unforeseen Conditions Allowance; which has a balance of $33,374.32. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Change Order No.
2 for a contract time extension of six (6) days; and approval in the amount of $20,991.00 for additional concrete sidewalk and driveway removal and replacement, to be paid out of the
contract's Unforeseen Conditions Allowance for the Auburn Ave. Improv. Project.
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Victor Majtenyi; Deputy Director of Public Utilities Richard C. Hasko, P.E.; Director of Environmental Services Department THROUGH:
David Harden; City Manager DATE: March 15, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 8.E. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 07-17.2 TO MATHEWS CONSULTING, INC. ITEM
BEFORE COMMISSION Request approval of Service Authorization #07-17.2 (Amendment 2 to Service Authorization 17) to Mathews Consulting, Inc. in the amount of $33,146.00 for additional
professional engineering services in the design of Area 12A Reclaimed Water System, P/N 2011-036. BACKGROUND On February 1, 2011, City Commission awarded Service Authorization #07-17
to Mathews Consulting for design services relating to the Area 12A Reclaimed Water System project. The project limits include the area on the barrier island south of Atlantic Ave to
just north of Casuarina Road. As part of the progressive design review, consultant and staff conducted value engineering and reviewed the design with conformance to the reclaimed master
plan. The review identified several items that needed to be addressed as part of the overall project, with one item a potential cost savings. The items are as follows: redesign of the
reclaimed main along Venetian Drive from a continuous 8” main to multiple smaller 4” main segments to save construction costs; perform design modifications on the reclaimed transmission
main along Atlantic Avenue due to identified utility conflicts; perform design upgrades on area drainage systems to address several existing drainage issues within the project limits;
perform design modifications to address conflicts with proposed Florida Public Utility mains; and separate the project into two distinct smaller bid packages for enhanced control and
project management, as well as being able to reallocate funds to other priority projects. The scope of services under this service authorization totals $33,146. A detailed description
of each item is listed below: During the design process, we realized that we could provide reclaimed services to most of the customers along Venetian Drive through smaller pipes using
alternative construction methods. The large piping along Venetian Drive can be eliminated in several sections since these areas can be fed from cross streets, and the piping that is
to remain can be downsized from an 8” diameter pipe to a 4” diameter pipe. In addition, piping along Bay and Nassau Streets can also be downsized from 6” diameter to 4” diameter.
Due to the numerous utility conflicts under the southern sidewalk area of Atlantic Avenue from Salina Avenue to Gleason Street, the main reclaimed pipe along Atlantic Avenue will need
to be relocated under the eastbound traffic lane of Atlantic Avenue. In the year 2000, improvements along Venetian Drive required use of a geo-grid mat under the roadway bed as stabilization
due to the existing muck soil conditions under the roadway. The Bay Street Stormwater Pump Station is located on the west side of Venetian Drive. To avoid compromising the geo-grid material,
the consult refrained from designing any improvements across Venetian Drive when designing the drainage improvements relating to Bay Street. Thus, the original design improvements started
on the east side of Venetian Drive. Subsequent research with the geogrid material manufacturer revealed that the mat can be cut and mended to re-establish the stabilization that the
mat is intended to provide. Thus, to fully realize the benefits of drainage upgrades upstream on the system, the design will now incorporate upgrades downstream across Venetian Drive
to the Bay Street Storm Pump Station. The residence at 1109 Nassau Street (east of Gleason Street) has experienced major flooding conditions during heavy rain events. Scope of services
includes design of drainage improvement on this street to address and alleviate the flooding condition. Florida Public Utilities is performing upgrades and customer connections on Ingraham
Avenue, Gleason Street, and Venetian Drive. A design coordination meeting revealed multiple potential conflict areas with their proposed gas mains. In addition, the City’s proposed drainage
upgrades on Bay Street are in conflict with their existing gas line. Scope of services includes design revisions to address these conflicts. Staff decided to reduce the funding level
on this project to allow re-prioritization for other repair and replacement projects (such as the Congress Ave force main replacement). The project will now be designed, prepared, and
bid as two separate projects; Phase I, Gleason Street and associated eastern side streets to be bid in 2012, and Phase II, Venetian Drive and associated side streets to be bid in 2013.
Services include separating the initial design into two distinct bid packages. Service Authorization #07-17 for design services relating to the Area 12A Reclaimed Water System project
was approved in the amount of $179,963. On September 9, 2011, Amendment #1 was approved for conducting additional soft-dig explorations in the amount of $14,850.00. Total proposed costs
for additional services under Amendment #2 (Service Authorization #07-17.2) is $33,146.00. FUNDING SOURCE Funding is available from account #441-5161-536-68.73, Water & Sewer Fund/Reclaimed
Water, Area 12A. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Service Authorization #07-17.2 to Mathews Consulting, Inc. in the amount of $33,146.00 for professional engineering services
related to the design of Area 12A Reclaimed Water System, P/N 2011-036.
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Begoña Krane, Engineer Richard C. Hasko, P.E., Environmental Services Director THROUGH: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: March 28,
2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 8.F. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 REJECTION OF ALL BIDS/DELRAY BEACH HEIGHTS SWALE PROJECT ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION This item is before the Commission
to reject all bids received for the Delray Beach Heights Swale Project number 2012-060, and authorize staff to re-bid the project. BACKGROUND This construction contract includes the
following improvements: Construction of 6” deep roadside swales, clearing and grubbing, grading, sod, and maintenance of traffic at several places throughout the Delray Beach Heights
Neighborhood. On Monday March 27, 2012, the City opened bids for the Delray Beach Heights Neighborhood Project. The bidders only acknowledged receipt of three (3) addendums, but four
(4) addendums were issued. Staff is requesting that Commission reject all bids received for project number 2012-060 based on bidders missing addendum number four (4). This irregularity
could have generated lower bids. Addendum #4, message from the apparent low bidder and location map are attached. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the rejection of all bids received for
the Delray Beach Heights Neighborhood swales projects and authorize staff to re-bid project.
!"#$%&'(&")%*+$,*!"!!!!!#$!%!!!&!'##'#!!'!('!)#!&#!&!!!!#"!!!#!!"!*&#!!#!&!(-$,,./0.%123(,4$5%'%$.,,2,0/6&-+()!)-+&!/(3'456+76+8:8()!-<')+4(84&!/33:5(=!!&#/##!#(3:!!>!!!"!!&!#!!#!!*?'!@A!!!)A=D)EFG(
3?DD=EHDAJKL+N835-<+LL)(OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO)#!OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO*OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
D!!!!(!P!!&!Q+(//2%-#%!!RL!!!!"!5K4ES!(!!RL!!!#!!(!!*T2.3Q#!!L/##)"!!!":!#!!#/!#D:#!!5(?!!!*(//2%-!!!"!#!!(#!!!#*P!#!!#'#&!!#!#!#T2.3-!&!!#$!(!#"#!(!#J&!!!>N#J&!!#!U!>N(!>#!##!!!#!!>!!(5(//2%-&!!!&!!
#'#&!*"#!!&!!#!&!%T2.3-&!!##!&*U&!!!'&!!#!!#(!!&!!&!!#(!!!##!#!!!!!!(!!!#>!48753##(3(//2%-S!!#!%VT2.3-?!'!!!#!!!!!(!!!#"#!!#!!J!!'!'!(N#!&!!!!(!!!%!#!"!!"!!!#!J!'&#'!(N(K(//2%-!/:!P!##&T2.3-'/:!!P!#(
#!!<#!#/=*%J"!*N!4+48K'5(4<(!!"!*!!&*!'#!!6=!*!&!!#!&%!>(:
1 Hasko, Richard To: Krejcarek, Randal Subject: RE: RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project From: Krane, Begona Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 10:29 AM To: Shutt, Brian Cc:
Krejcarek, Randal Subject: FW: RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project Brian,Belowisthecontractorsobjectiontorebiddingtheproject.Pleaseadvise.ThankyouBegoña Krane Engineering
Department City of Delray Beach434 S. Swinton Ave.Delray Beach, FL 33444Phone #561-243-7299Fax #561-243-7060From: Frank Bou [mailto:FBou@charliefrymyer.com] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012
10:25 AM To: Krane, Begona Cc: Luis Sanchez; Josh Marfleet; Kevin Taylor Subject: FW: RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project BegoñaIaminreceiptofyoucorrespondencetoLuisSanchezandherearem
ycommentsonAddenda#4:Items#1and#2werediscussedinthemandatoryprebid.Item#3–thecontractspecifiesthatthedurationoftheprojectis40dayssubstantialcompletionand20daysafterthat.Thebiddershouldknowthattheyare
responsibletomaintainallinstalledmaterialsuntilacceptancebythecity.AppendixAisstatedonpage167aspartofthecontractdocuments.Item#4–Section02110Part3.02andSection02110Part3.02ofthecontractdocumentsdescr
ibeproceduresfordisposingofmaterials.Item#5–nothingincontractdocumentsstatethatasbuiltsarerequired.Ifthecontractorreadthruthecontractdocumentsandwasinattendanceattheprebid,thesequestionswouldnotbeval
id.Inthiscase,theonlypartysustainingdamagesismyfirm.Addendum#4shouldnotaffectanyofthebidderspricingasallofitwasdiscussedinonewayoranotherduringthebidprocess.Allbiddersnowhaveaccesstoeveryonebidpricew
hichgiveanunfairadvantagetothefirmsthatwerenotlowbidder.Irespectfullyrequestthatyouupholdthebidresultsinfavorofourfirmaslowbiddersandwouldliketoknowwhatthenextstepsaresincethecityisholdingourbidandbi
dbond.Pleaseadvise.Sincerely
2 FrankA.BouPrincipalCharlie Frymyer Paving 4802SW51stStreetDavie,Florida3331495452256809545229478Faxfbou@charliefrymyer.comwww.charliefrymyer.comFrom: Luis Sanchez Sent: Thursday, March
29, 2012 5:03 PM To: Frank Bou; Josh Marfleet Subject: FW: RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project From: Krane, Begona [mailto:krane@mydelraybeach.com] Sent: Thursday, March
29, 2012 4:53 PM To: Luis Sanchez Cc: Frank Bou; Josh Marfleet; Krejcarek, Randal Subject: RE: RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project Luis,AfterItalkedtotheCityEngineerandtheCityAttorney
,wethoughtthatitwassignificantenoughtoinvalidatethebid.Attachedisaddendumnumber4.Begoña Krane Engineering Department City of Delray Beach434 S. Swinton Ave.Delray Beach, FL 33444Phone
#561-243-7299Fax #561-243-7060From: Luis Sanchez [mailto:LSanchez@charliefrymyer.com] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:28 PM To: Krane, Begona Cc: Frank Bou; Josh Marfleet Subject: RE:
RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project Begoña,Wereceivedyouremailwiththeattachednotification.Wherecanweseeaddenda#4.Wherethechangesinaddenda#4significantenoughtoinvalidatethisbid??Please
advise.Thanks,Luis F. Sánchez-Kinghorn Managing Member
3 Charlie Frymyer Paving 4802SW51stStreetDavie,Florida3331495452256809545229478Faxlsanchez@charliefrymyer.comwww.charliefrymyer.comTEXASMBAAlumni
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Linda Karch, Director of Parks and Recreation THROUGH: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: March 28, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 8.G.
-REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE LICENSE AGREEMENT/PREP AND SPORTS, INC. ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement between the
City of Delray Beach and Prep and Sports, Inc. to extend the term for an additional two (2) years for their use of a portion of the Soccer Complex. BACKGROUND On March 16, 2010 the City
of Delray Beach entered into a two (2) years License Agreement with Prep and Sports, Inc. The Agreement granted Prep and Sports, Inc. a license to use a portion of the Soccer Complex
to establish a year-round athletic training facility which prepares professional athletes through a fitness and training program. In return for the use of the complex, Prep and Sports,
Inc. has implemeted a sports training camp which is free for eligible children of Delray Beach. Commission approval is requested to extend the term of the agreement for two (2) years
beginning on March 16, 2012. RECOMMENDATION Parks and Recreation recommends approval of Amendment No. 1 to the License Agreement.
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Lula Butler, Director, Community Improvement THROUGH: David Harden, City Manager DATE: March 28, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 8.H. -REGULAR
COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 HOUSING REHABILITATION GRANT/CONTRACT AWARD ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Approval is requested for one (1) Housing Rehabilitation contract to be awarded
to the lowest responsive bidder. Funding for the project is through the Residential Construction Mitigation Program (RCMP) and Neighborhood Service Division, Housing Rehabilitation funds.
BACKGROUND Approval is requested for one (1) Housing Rehabilitation grant(s) to be awarded to the lowest responsive bidder for the following projects: 318 SE 5th Street/Cordoba Construction
Co./$29,040.00. Total Rehab cost: $31,065.20 Grant awards are based on the actual cost of the rehabilitation, as determined by the lowest responsive bidder(s), plus a 5% contingency.
Total rehab cost also includes lead inspection, lead abatement, lead clearance, termite inspection, termite treatment, and recording fees. Additional cost may be incurred for lead clearance
test(s). The contingency may be used for change orders and all unused funds will remain with the Housing Rehabilitation program. Inspection of work is done by the Department of Community
Improvement’s Building Inspection and Neighborhood Services Divisions. Contracts are executed between the building contractor and the property owner. The City remains the agent and Neighborhood
Services monitors all work performed by the contractor, ensuring compliance according to specifications and program guidelines. Pay request forms require both contractor and homeowner’s
signatures. Grant recipients have met all eligibility requirements as specified in the approved Policies and Procedures. The rehabilitation activities will bring the homes to minimum
code requirements by repairing the roof, electric and plumbing systems and correcting other incipient code violations. Detailed work write-ups and individual case files are available
for review in the Neighborhood Services Division Office. The Neighborhood Services Division is responsible for ensuring that the housing rehabilitation contracts are awarded to the lowest
responsive bidder as a result of a formal bid process. Therefore, an in-house policy was created to limit awards to the lowest responsive bidder as it relates to the Division’s professional
in-house estimate. This serves to disqualify unreasonably low bids and therefore, protect
against the resulting change order requests. FUNDING SOURCE State Housing Initiative Program (SHIP) 118-1924-554-49.19 $ 21,440.16 Residential Construction Mitigation Program 118-1936-554-49.19
$ 9,625.04 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends awarding one (1) Housing Rehabilitation grant to the lowest responsive bidder in the amount of $31,065.20.
BID/QUOTE #: BID # 04-2012NS APPLICANT: Mary Bomango PROJECT ADDRESS: 318 SE 5th Street DATE OF BID LETTERS: January 4, 2012 DATE OF BID OPENING: January 30, 2012 GENERAL CONTRACTORS
BID AMOUNT BID BOND Abisset Corporation $ 29,215.00 All Phase Roofing $ -Statement of no bid All-Site Construction, Inc. $ -ARZ Builders, Inc. $ -Benchmark Custom Building of Palm Beach
$ -Built Solid Construction, LLC $ 35,010.00 Citywide Construction Services, Inc. $ -CJ Contracting, LLC $ 42,049.00 Cordoba Construction Co. $ 28,724.00 JIJ Construction Corp. $ -KM
Construction Inc. $ -MacDonald Construction Company of Palm Beach $ -Statement of no bid Raymond Graeve and Sons Construction $ -Statement of no bid South Florida Construction Services,
Inc. $ 34,475.00 Sunband Builders Construction Inc. $ -In-House Estimate: $ 26,379.25 RECOMMENDED CONTRACTOR: Cordoba Construction Co. BID/CONTRACT AMOUNT : $ 29,040.00 5% Contingency
$ 1 ,452.00 $ 30,492.00 Lead Inspection 450.00 Lead Clearance 85.00 Termite Inspection N/A Termite Treatment N/A Recording Fees 38.20 GRANT CONTRACT AMOUNT 31,065.20 FUNDING SOURCE:
Account # SHIP $21,440.16 118-1924-554-49.19 RCMP $9,625.04 118-1936-554-49.19 COMMENTS: Recommend awarding bid to lowest responsive contractor, Cordoba Construction Company CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES DIVISION HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM BID INFORMATION SHEET
BID /QUOTE NUMBER: BID # 04-2012NS OWNER: Mary Bomango ADDRESS: 318 SE 5th Street BID ADVERTISEMENT DATE: January 4, 2012 BID OPENING DATE: January 30, 2012 In-House Abisset Corporation
All Phase Roofing Built Solid Construction, LLC CJ Contracting, LLC.Cordoba Construction Company, Inc. South Florida Construction Services, Inc. 1 Globial Encasement $ 2 ,750.00 $ 500.00
$ 4,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 750.00 $ 2,580.00 2 Rake Soil & Place Mulch $ 5 00.00 $ 650.00 $ 800.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 600.00 $ 950.00 3 Remove Interior Doors $ 7 00.00 $ 300.00 $ 965.00 $ 900.00
$ 400.00 $ 530.00 4 Remove Wood Windows $ 2 ,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 3,160.00 5 Flat Deck $ 1 ,350.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,450.00
6 Install New Roof $ 2 ,568.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 1,524.96 $ 2,680.00 6a Install New Roof $ 1,175.04 RCMP $ 1,175.04 7 Replace Soffit And Fascia $ 3 23.05 $ 315.00 $
475.00 $ 420.00 $ 4.00 $ 530.00 8 House Numbers $ 5 0.00 $ 25.00 $ 95.00 $ 10.00 $ 20.00 $ 75.00 9 Hurricane Shutters $ 7 84.00 $ 650.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 650.00 $ 870.00 RCMP
$ 650.00 10 Install Impact Windows $ 4 ,900.00 $ 9,950.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 8,560.00 RCMP $ 7,800.00 11 Paint House Complete $ 2 ,030.95 $ 1,950.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 1,999.00
$ 1,600.00 $ 2,380.00 TOTAL $ 9,625.04 12 Install Interior Door $ 1 60.00 $ 225.00 $ 235.00 $ 120.00 $ 280.00 $ 250.00 13 Paint interior Complete $ 1 ,572.50 $ 1,600.00 $ 1,800.00 $
1,800.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 1,625.00 14 Repair Drywall $ 6 50.75 $ 300.00 $ 465.00 $ 150.00 $ 550.00 $ 470.00 15 Repair Hardwood Flooring $ 2 00.00 $ 150.00 $ 360.00 $ 100.00 $ 180.00 $ 325.00
16 Install Toilet $ 3 50.00 $ 375.00 $ 375.00 $ 350.00 $ 420.00 $ 350.00 17 Install Vainty/W Sink $ 7 25.00 $ 625.00 $ 465.00 $ 600.00 $ 480.00 $ 635.00 18 TanklessWater Heater $ 1 ,715.00
$ 575.00 $ 890.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,960.00 19 Smoke Detectors $ 4 80.00 $ 525.00 $ 795.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 875.00 20 Install 150 Amp Service $ 1 ,240.00 $ 1,850.00 $ 1,600.00
$ 3,500.00 $ 2,050.00 $ 1,850.00 21 Install Exterior Light Fixture $ 2 30.00 $ 150.00 $ 225.00 $ 100.00 $ 240.00 $ 460.00 22 Repair Ele Service $ 1 ,100.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,065.00 $ 1,700.00
$ 800.00 $ 910.00 $ 1,100.00 TOTAL $ 2 6,379.25 $ 29,215.00 $ -$ 35,010.00 $ 42,049.00 $ 28,724.00 $ 34,475.00 Contractor added line item for trash bin Statement of no bid
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: REBECCA S. O'CONNOR, TREASURER DAVID A. BOYD, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE THROUGH: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER DATE: March 27, 2012 SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM 8.I. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 RESOLUTION NO. 20-12/INVESTMENT POLICY ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Approve Resolution No. 20-12 to implement an investment policy
establishing objectives and parameters for the management of public funds (excluding pension funds, trust funds and funds related to debt issuance) of the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
BACKGROUND Public Financial Asset Management (PFM), our investment advisors, conducted a review of our current policy and provided an updated version. This policy is designed to ensure
the prudent management of public funds and provide the availability of operating and capital funds when needed and an investment return competitive with comparable funds and financial
market indices. RECOMMENDATION Recommend Commission approval of Resolution No. 20-12.
:965;<*5,,501$20:965;<*5,5*-9&*=&5//665,5*-9&*=5'9;:=(9&-;5:'96*(;6-,>*-9,96*/9,*5;&=5:6<:;<6<,'6<:6<,**5*-9:9?<:9/9,*6569&*5,02@A2B;5:'6**<*96,&*:9;*,>*5*-9,96*/9,*5<(;&<,'6%96*(;6-,>*-9:965,6(;*965
*-9&*=/,>9:,'*-9'9;9>*5,5<*-5:*=%:5',>*-9&*=/,>9:C*-*-9<*-5:*=*5/;9/9,**-9,96*/9,*5;&=%,':5',>,99&*9'*9&&&'(!"&%&&"!!!!%602@A2B6!!"!8!%&&8!602@A2B6!3*&&""602@A2B6!"&#!*!!!!"#!!! *&&"9#"!!!!'"&/!"&&A6
A1A&&*&/"%'"
"*&/"!4!#!"&&!!"8!##!70120DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD/=5:**96*3DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD&&4
!11<
=1++1B ##,6=%+3+;$/==%$;+/===%=#J/$*/#*;-/*=J/$=J%/</0*=;#;3*&;=*6J%$*#$;+3/#/:J=%/*&=$#;#<=*$;=#*//$*:J==%=#*/#<;#*;<$#=#J/$*/#*+;/3/$:J===%;#*=#3=#0/3*=;#8=I%3*&;=H/=#J/$*/#*=#$*=*3*=;#$#/</$8I%*3
=*6#<=N3==*6/N3=//#*$8I=%;+/*=*=J/$/</*=;#;=#J/$*/#*=#$*3/#*$'I==%3*&;=H/=#J/$*/#*$#+;*;<=;;+;$*=;#'I===%/=J*=J/$#/J/$//+3&$/0///#*$:I=J%+/;#//$3//#*$:IJ%/+;*=#08IJ=%*&=,+*63$*;=<0///#*$8IJ==%=#J/$*/
#*+;<=6;+*=;#'**&/#*(0 =1***&/#*(=1+ N
=1++#$,#"(+1-"+ '+)(-/'"&0!*)))1"E1 ))" ?LM@%*) ) )" 1") ) ! 1)1!)" . %!= !$C%:8 $1))) 1 "!>)+ "!>) % "?%%)1@"E)1)%!11)?1!$+)*"E11))) !)%=1..))! .1%*"E1 14 ) 1 > )%<4
*)" 1"") !4 %+ !!") )) )1 4 %=1=1)" !"E1." .1. 4 %1)) 4 "E1 " "1%*1 1!.)1." %1/011<1) ")!1"):$:%:%)")1)" !" !) )
=1++:1)!1)%+ () )1) 11).) 11) )".1%*)=1 1K)%$=1 1" =1 1B:%!1!/0* ) " "1"L+ +M ")) >11)%=1 !!) 1) > "1 ))" 1 K ..))1 1>)) 4 !)%*L+ +M!(=1" !E )1!)) >!)"1 )"")!)"""
1 1%9 ) " "1!)L+ +M ) 1 1" L+ />)M%* "1 1 4 )1 =1 1>(E .) )1!)) .) !! ). !." 11 G. )""!)"")%1!/1!/1!1/)11 1))"1 !))>1)! )".)1 %)11 1) "! )1) " )K1)%11!!110!*" )) ! )K))
%* " )1 ! ) )" )) ")%*!) .)))
=1++8 .)!".1 G%#)1>)G )%= ) ) 1!)!) ) %1001* " ))))C "E 1) ) ! $C%:8%H01A!11!1101!!G =1 1)!4 )" )";$ 7 L+$M" 1.#!6. )) ".K)))1 ,) %*=1 1G !))1 ,) %G ))1 ,) 4 $ />8,?)@)1 !)>1
!(%!4%%;) ".=#%%$) !K"%G =1 1)!4 )" ) ) " 1.#!6.%H101<901<901!* ))> 4 ,, >) %= 11" >) 4!)>)!"1 )))%%,G ) )1. %*"K !"1"1 ) !)%=1" 1 ,) ?L M@1))) ! "1"1> 1?8@ ! 1!" ) %
=1++'* )!!4)%H11!1/!11!101! " =1 1 ))> " ! . G ))1?@4 ". ))1 ". " . )1 " % !" " " 1"E1 %&!1"" " )))") G).) >)"%)".))1 " (%*=$%"=$%%9$-)"G )")1 .)%.))1 "K ) * "=1 1G)1"
)") %$").) "1"G !E "=1 1)1" ! ")%/>)! " (%9 ) )1" )%91.>" )%94 >))1)%911!L! M.;1!))!"" "") !K )". !)!) %H01A!11!1/!1=1 " "E! !"E1. K %&!1!1 !
=1++D))) )1 "1,)1.) )) ))K %*!14 ) " "%* "1)1)" . . 11%*)41) " 1%=1 ))" %%* +=/%=1G*1 +=/%1! +=/!"1 !. -%%+)>!1?8U@1" "1 +=/%%4* +=/" Q"$ F+K41"%:%41 +=/4 )1 "%*"4 1) "=1 1!
!E)1) %))41 =1+$ +& "" %%3 $01$%+G*1" "")) ! "3 $01%$! "" !(*$5$ <01$?L$<0$M@**#
=1++C* *$)%+)>U1" "1 3 $01$%%<*> 13 $01$1?8@ )%%3 $01%+G*1" "" "3 $01)1 "". " 3 $01%$! "" !(01#" )3 $/>)5=).," "!)& ,"!) ., " & "0$1 3 $ 0 ,*I=#!",3 $01 "3 $+"&# ,3 $01 )" "
3 $)& 3"1),+E " %+)>8U1" "1 3 $01%%<= 1 =>8U1" "1 1 3 $01%
=1++B:%<*>13 $011?8@ )%% =?3 $01) @%+G*1" "" "3 $01) ? =@!, !( .?@ &<. ".?&<@ #?#@ &<)? ,@ , &<)))%+)>CU1" "1 =%%<= 1 =>8U1" "1 %:%<*>1 =1?8@ )%/%=*)$1%+G*1,"" )1".G ! ".G
!3 $ " $ )1 ) " $+"))C $% "." !G !1%%+)>U1" "1 ,"" )%%<= 1 =>8U1" " ) !%:%<*>"?@ )%
=1++%)%+G%*1)) 1" 4"K)%4 ))>)%"% ) !! )!?@" %. )!1 !)")) %%$G " "3 $0101 =! 1?8@ 1.1)) )1 )%=, 1)4)")))1%%+)>8U1" "1 )> ?@" 1!)%%<= 1 =>U1" "1 !%:%<*>)B )%0%+)%+G*1))3 $) )L+,M"
K L,M"$ F+K?)))@%=))". " ?L<;M@, "<;)1 " LM""!G %%+)>8U1" " 1 )))%%<= 1 =>U1" "1 !%:%<
=1++*>)))"C )%&.K)%+G*1.K) " ". ".!")" 1$),)) L+,M" P=1$1 L,M$ F+P%%+)>8U1" " 1 .K)%<= 1 =>U1" "1 !%:%<*>.K)"C )%=%$ <01*>" *>,/>)"%+G*1 1>" >, >) "" 1" LM" K "LM"$ F+K, " LJ=0M"
KL,M"$ F+K, "%%+)>U1" "1 >" >,>) "%%<= 1 =>8U1" "1 !%:%<> =$>11 "?@ )%8%<J" ;">11 ") !) >)%
=1++-% =1)? @%=1G*1), , )1 =1)B: ) !D%%%WD%,D%= 1) )1 =1)B:1 >1)) 1) 1 %%+)>8U1" "1 %%<= 1 =>U1" "1 !,$/,D1 %:%4* " LM"$ F+K41"%8%41!1 4 )1 "%*"4 1) "!41E)1) %2%=1=1+%=1G*111)G
) =,))1 $'% $ )1 11%%+)>8U1" "1 11)%%4*1)" LM"$ F+K41":%4
=1++1!1) 4 )1 "%*"4 1) "!41E)1) %<%)#%+G*1) ")G )!3 $" ) "3 $1 ")LM" K "LM"$ F+K%%+)>8U1" " 1 )%%<= 1 =>8U1" "1 !%:%<*>)" )%%);"%+G*1)" "))=K*)<4 0+ "= " 3 $01%%+)>8U1" " 1 )"%%<=
1 =>8U1" "1 !%:%<*>)"" )%
=1++:#%,. $?$@%+G*1,". ?$@!" "10$/))) )%%+)>U1" "1 $%%<= 1 =>8U1" "1 !$%8%<>1$1?8@ )%*" ) 1%* 1" ) )) $ %*1" K )%H1!!0!1!=1 11) 1))"%L 11M 1! ) 1 1 1%H/!01!= 1)K)!)"., ,)%*".!!1.%%,)?@$F+
0=+= >!" ".) )K".1) %%=1) ,) 1,?@1G!") >) 3%$%*01%*))) >!1 >))>) !"G ".") )K%*!G<,63%$%*= >= >) )%
=1++8%=1 1!))"".1 " )"1, ".%H1*)1 !41)%$ 4) !(% 1 )) %+1" ) "1)%) %1 1/%+1 .1;")1 !)1 %*))1 " !()1 )! 1 1 ".1.1 1%*)!!)"".1 " !)"1, )".%1") 1)0$ %=1)"1")"%H1@1<0!11!$!>) )"
! ) 7 ) " " "7 ")) %*" ) )% ) ". ) " 01$ 3 $!")))"$ $'8C% $"G > !3 $!G ) > ! "$ % )!") )1 K.) ) )%* ))!1" G " !G")1 ! %; G )") !)! ! %* )1 !.)))1 " %$"!". 11)"" L 11%)M"))"
!1))) %$ " %
=1++'H!11<1*1)" ) " %*1!) ))1 %1)<11<!!/<)IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
=1++D(-#,,'+ ,-#&#$,##6#1',(('5&#',= "!") 1 %6#(+$Q $%Q,E'"(+!". 1.!L )%M,,)(E&!(5'"",=)!>> ,". "1"%0 "))))L!M $%/>) ". " 1"4 4) %$'6" *1" " ! . >) " %)#E',J((#(=)J,> "> !) ) "".%4
)) %3 , ".P) 1. ." 4".%),","#; )%U%*U4")%)''!(5'"+!!) " )%*)K".%*" " 1)%.!L)%M)#(-'E)",*=#1"BBB# .), ")))> )%*) !., >, "!.,.%/".1?)@%# !.. )")1 ,)1" !"" %*) 1 !) "!#%#P. " ".,
1.%*) ).! )) )")%= .) # 7) G 4 , .%)#(-'E,;)#&,*.# #L"M?,"@ ), %3 .# )8 , 4%/.#!GA:", !1GA"!,)" 1 4 %*,"! #" 1.# %*4 G 1")) 1)4 1 ).%= .) #7) G 4 , ,.%)#(-'E. > )1")1)%)".
)1 . )P1%
=1++C)"&'"(+!". )1%)#&'E,,(""#=)>*" . ).! %= )")! ) ) " . %)#&"!))" ?)!" @) ! ) ) )))%)E#'+!(5'"",$ K. 1 $!* +*?)) ")@%* ! , !))!. 1K"1%*1E!".%)E5*1! " P )%.1 LG M)1 E
G) % L1%M.1111)) L.1M ".%)'E';')"!%L".M"!" 11%L M" !)% .."!1!".)" %$Q+%Q)5,;)#&,#" 1 ,"%!)"> %"#*"" ) 1 ) ) %> ,)"")1" )%$ !)1) !%*)))?@/),,?@ ,) ) ?4,@ ?@," %*) 8" ) %B)#&,;,$!"
)1 )) ) %'" "( ,"=>." "> ?)@) ) ?@%"") ")" %'=1))"!) ) ))")1 )%'"F"#+"!"!) )) )) %'"F&'66B"6"#=>) ) ,)? @%*))
=1++B ) )%=)) %=L)1M;))) 1") %*)1 ))) "%)"1 )!!) .%'("'$ ) ")%= )1%3>D 1, ""#$;%#$K"+" P)1%1> 1" P)%'' " ")! %5#''+*)!)%Q).Q.)! "%>)".". )%5# ">) )" K1%5''#<"&" " )% ?))@" " K 1%5,&+$.)1
"".) L %M$1 )P " .1%' )) ".))" !%"$'+',5,+#=>$) ! 1 1)""1 % $9 * J+)"" %,"'+1'5,#+=1>!")" 1 "!) 1%" 1$ ! "#!6.$./>)*))G " %))) *%'"$"$, )) 11)!) !)%G ;"?L;M@ 11%?@!). 1 1 >
1?@" )!1 1 >?>4 @%'"$"$!(5'"+ !1 ) ) >1%,"6#&)#&K 4 ,"1%#! A"%,)> A% !
=1++> %*! )! )>) %= ) 7) G 4 , ,.%",(5#,3 " " %) 1%J)?!@ .%",(5# " 1.1"".% " 1 L %M",(5#!(5'"",#,". 1%/>) (3%$%* #.P) +)%",(5#*"!" "!1%$Q+%Q"$'," "("#1 1 1) ) ) %''"("
K>) )1%>)" 4 )B8T! 1))AB88)A1%5 L-,;1#$;)1 ) ". "%5'"#*! 1K)K!!)1!1!%* )))1!)%3 . .)1". .%* . ))?%% @%/##"$Q #%Q/&#+3"')G 1$!"".3%$%* 9%% )%* 9". ""!".1 %/&!(5'"",3"')G "."!".".
)3%$%* %/&$Q 1$%Q/&'6#(+!(5'"+ " " % 4 4 3%$%*%/&'6#(+01) ! "3%$%)) ""!.) ) ) !1 .%* 0##&<&<$< *J%
=1++/&',"#,5'#(''"#=/> )".A8) ))".%/&'/''&")#E=//)>; %1) )?0$/@!.)1,! )1 1)1 %* "!). ) . )1 , "% ).)1 = . < .%4 "% "" "3%$%1 1 . )3%$% % L M)%/&'/5#&,=/&/5#&,> ) 1." )>14
4 "! 1""! )%/&'/5#&,=/&/5#&,>* " ) )%* 1""QQ ! P)%/&'#)#E!+,=/)>; %1) )?0$/@!".?!1 ".@! """.!)1 ) ".1 1 "%*))))&< 4 .%&< )1 ")) .!%&< "" "3%$%1 1 . )3%$% .%4 "% L"M L*+M)%/&'#'66''"#=/'M/'
&&"(M>; %1) )")?0$/@)1 " .") )) " " ". %&< "" "3%$%1 1 . )3%$% .%4 " $% LM)%/&'"#'66,,(""#=/'M/##"M>; %1) )")?0$/@)1 4 .") " " $?)). @%# "" "3%$%1 1 . )3%$% .%4 " $% L".M)%/&','$)#E;
". 1$%/&','$!+,=-/&>* ) ".3 $" P)%*) E!(?@!".14?@! ?@)
=1++.)"" 1%* 1$ )!1 1." ".%= "1" 01.!L 1 M "%/"##("#&5,'+65'+5-'"+#(=/>)1),G?$;@%=##$=%?#$@%*.1,1G)"". >.%*11$ />%/",(6#;+"#66#".) !)))%*) .))) " >" %/"(-#$,',!'$"(#(;1#$;)1
) ) "%/"#6!(5'"+=/'N 'O>" ! E >%1", ".) ! >) %$LJ"$%M/'&&"($Q &<)Q%"##"$Q01#Q%B,*# 4 " 3%$%). . "%3 1! ! 1>4 %)"" 3%$%) 3%$% %$'##"#'66,,(""#='M"##"M>; %01,! 4). ),". %<),%0#
" " 3%$%1?! 3%$%@%$'##!(5'"","3%$%1". " 1%* 411"3%$%.%$Q*# $<0$%Q$'##!#,'&#''",=!>+1! "E )1 "3%$% )"! !%0$/)".3%$%01" "3%$%01%! )13%$%*%$ 0$/"))!%/>)0$/ (&<&<# $<%$'##!#,'&#''",!(5'"+
"01$) /)% $%#&K) ..%
=1++#',@#+=>!1" )" %))") )) 1%*=; .1%3 !,". %#'##',) %* )1 ""E1%*)"G@ > "." 1 @1 "4 E "%= !)(%#' (5,"#,!!)!.E )%%!'"# '#,("#5-'"+ '((5#"#6#&'('&E"#6,))!G)))! !) 1 %%5,&", E"#6,$)
". )))? "!@") ! ) ) .)%:%$"&#( -+,"(&"$'+,(5'"",,., 1 1.)%1 ")) %*) !) 1 %8%'&6"# 5-'"+,5B'&"#, B',,$" "1 )"1 ))% )11) )1)"%'%3'"#(# "'"# '#,("#, '"#$,#,#&%"''#, ',,) )))
")) "! ))1 "))))%9"1> .)G %D%$# %"''#, '6'#%"--&B#E#&-"'&@'+(5,&"#,* !" ! !)()1 )"). 1!%#$',/' !1 % .11)) > ,1 !G%#$,#&$",'))1 ) 1)1 >%#$,#&$",'( "!1) 1)))4 1%
=1++:#$,#'& ")11 )7" " K,"$ F+K,"%LM " 1 )"1 "!L%M"D5"&"+11!1%1 ,)% ".".!) "!" .)%($'###$,#=>1"1!) ?%% $ K + @%#6@1''#$,#'6' !) %'E5*.1 %*)!!" ! )%'E@@'E E1.1)G %,'5'(-,6'#!
) )" " .?@ 1 ) )))%5'"+!)))"") %&"51',=1J,>3 4) ?8, @%* " ") )! *#%3 !1) !"1". ?)) ) !G !> ) @%#+'E*.!, "?"))".K)%@ %#+'E55/5#&=/>) 1.(3%$%*"))".P) )%. !$/ =1)B: "EL,DM!1
4 %K "1?#J@A%%"#$;%&+J,#$,',!'$"(;1#$;)1 ) ) "%'66)(E&!(5'"",=)!>,". )!)) "1 ".)"!P)%*E$ "0## &<%*1$!"1. ) %$11.)) ) ) ) !")) " !)" ))! %'66,,@1-'56-!(5'"",) ! )) " 1),"%<0#%
=1++85#"(";)#& " "1)"%*1E)>) >,4 >"%55/5#&+) " 1)1% ) >?" 4 @7>). )1"1?#J@%6"B'" "( ,"=6"B>< ?A @ " " .%,,5*.11) %* " P! " P" 1 "" %* " ) P)%?$"!%@X?*@,?<"@Y?#" @!L#G $;G%M
G$/ )3%$%#$;)1 ) ". "%;#$;" ))%= K$F+ F+)% '&'"($Q.+%Q#'E'"#, 1))1)." 1$ ) )) %'51 11%-+,"("$'+1 1" %' " 1 "1%'"5*"!" "11%$Q%Q'"'+') 1 " 1.#!6.%+ " 1 ! %+ " ).1 ) "E1%+
)3%$%*.%'"'))4%& )),Z,"$F+ +," K%'"#("1!%")1))") %)))1) ) %'5&##$,'!#&'&$ 4!11)4>)" !.) )1 "
=1++') ) ).) !! . !. )) 4 %L) )M )1.! !)" %95" "&5B"(,"'+,+ $C".1".1(%=G > !3 $!3 $7%&)))""!G !3 $1 )%%& ) )1 )= 3%$%%%C4%:%4%$%C8%&" "*4 )" )%#6) ) >%1!)17) >! !) >
%*!"G G% 5'#1 1>) )1 %"F&"#,=,,,>* "!)1 ".1%0LG M! ) LG M!" .1%$L3G 0?<@%M '#()",*&<K, ") ))> )" !.,!."? ) )@ G"1?A" )@ G %0") " 1 .,. 1)).%*)! ) ")))) 4 ")1 13%$%*"%&<K )"%*))))K>
)%= ) &< 7) G 4 , .% '#(,*&<K , ")!8 ,%=A,A'"!,)A,A:"%*,4")%= ) &<7) G 4 , ,.%5'(-,6'#=>,11!1") ".) )
=1++D ))%* "!)) )) %=)G 1!%"J+! 1 1K ".L,)M! 1 ) %)" LM"))1 1!)".)) !%) " .!)))))1 ))%$',5'(-,6'#=$',>))1!%3 " 1""!,%" 1) " . ))%! E"#6$1 " 1"%$.)) 1%!(#&'+'E.) )1 %!(5'"",#&"#6"!
1 ".! ".LM11 1) ) 1 )!1%$ "1 " %.)1. .1 %!"#E"#6/5#&)1? 1@ ! ") )"?)" "1@))1") "1%3 !" %!'&* "!) 3%$%*1>) )")%) "" "!!%*" .!."! 1%!#&'&L'J,;1#$;)1 ) ) "%!1!=!'1'&"#6 6",'&#',#&'"#("
!(5'"",>)) 3%$%*1 ) )))) 1 G,)*%*4 Q)Q )")) ,*?%%#)@%!'5(5'&,#1" )),)) 11, " %!%* %1,* &<*+)%< 'BB&<"" )%=".&<K )".!*+=+ )))1%*?8 @!) 4!!" !*+!") )%* ")"" " ! 4 .) G .1%
=1++C1##,,+5-'"+=1>; %!! )3 $1!" B 1)*J %+!)) ,)!)%*J)"*J)"*JP)!) " "3 $%*JG ")A"%3 G*J" 13%$%*)A8%4 "%15'#=1) 1) ) "G G %* .1)) )1 ) %1',5'",1 " "". "3%$%01 3%$%)*%= *"*
*" %". ""! ,*) ?%%Q 8")1*Q@%1',5'+)",=1@)",>$, "3 $01 !%*" 1 )"%* "!))" 1 "%3%$%*:,!.,!. ',!.*,1',5'+)#&,<,," "". "3%$%01 ! "3%$%)*%**)) * %1',5'+,= ," "". "3%$%01 !"3%$%)*%**,8,
,*#%1'5,". " )1" %*)) )!" )" !%0#" '"5$/8,)? " 4 )@" ,"". %0#'"F&"#,=,,,>* "!.11 ".1%0LG M! ) LG M!" .1%$LG 0?<@%M'"B@!(5'"+" "11" ) E?%% !.,@%$L#%M3"6-&$'65'"+='P5,N$'65'"+O>*1
1) "))))11"? @) 1 "))1)%).> ,)%3"6-&$'65'"+*1 1) E " ) !)1%
=1++B<"&5'$) ) .) 1%* 1 ) 3%$%* 1> 1 4)!%6 1")1) ?@!,11 L1 M?@!,11! %<"&=<1>$L6 M>) %6 "!K %<"&5'"+=<1> 1!1 %"!) ) . !!) ) %* 16*1)%<"&* %=Q6 MQ6 1QQ6 Q Q6 %Q
=1++(-#)#$,#;/5#&95,"##"'% )"1 !1) "E1%% ) ! " ! %% )! ? )@ !) ) %:% )!1)!!G ) ! !! %8% 1 )%'%1 %G ") [D% ! ! %C%=) "" ) !)) [
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager THROUGH: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: March 29, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 8.J. -REGULAR
COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 SPECIAL EVENT REQUEST /14TH ANNUAL CINCO DE MAYO FESTIVAL ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION City Commission is requested to approve a Special Event Permit for
the 14th Annual Cinco de Mayo Festival to be held on Saturday, May 5, 2012 from 2:00 p.m. – 10:00 p.m., on the grounds of Old School Square and in the Old School Square Park and to authorize
staff support for traffic control and security, trash removal and signage preparation and installation. The event sponsor is also requesting use of the Old School Square parking garage
for vendors and staff, and a City generator. Site set up is to begin at 7:00 a.m. BACKGROUND Attached are a special event permit, site plan, budget, economic calculator received from
Ms. Connie Hoke, Event Coordinator for the Festival. Cinco de Mayo celebrates the date Mexican soldiers defeated the French at Puebla Mexico. This celebration is a party that represents
freedom and liberty. The committee is composed of Hispanic residents of our City. The event will be held on the grounds of Old School Square and Old School Square Park. The event committee
will be responsible for event management, liability insurance, vendor approval, site set up and fencing. Although not requested, a Fire Department inspection will be needed as well as
an onsite service unit. The estimated overtime costs are $4,715, $250 for signage and $35 trash boxes for a total of $5,000. Per event policies and procedures, the estimated cost to
be paid for City services is $3,820. Since alcoholic beverages will be sold and they will be charging admission, the site will be secured to contain alcohol consumption on site. We also
would require that all alcoholic beverages be served in paper or plastic cups, no bottles. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the special event permit, staff support for traffic
control and security, clean up, EMS assistance and Fire inspection, signage preparation and installation and a City generator. Approval is contingent on the receipt of a Certification
of Liability Insurance and Liquor Liability Insurance fourteen (14) days prior to the event.
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Jasmin Allen, Planner Paul Dorling, AICP, Director of Planning and Zoning THROUGH: City Manager DATE: March 29, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA
ITEM 8.K. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 REVIEW OF APPEALABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT BOARD ACTIONS ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION The action requested of the City Commission is review
of appealable actions which were taken by various Boards during the period of March 19, 2012 through March 30, 2012. BACKGROUND This is the method of informing the City Commission of
the land use actions, taken by designated Boards, which may be appealed to the City Commission. After this meeting, the appeal period shall expire (unless the 10 day appeal period has
not occurred). Section 2.4.7(E), Appeals, of the LDRs applies. In summary, it provides that the City Commission hears appeals of actions taken by an approving Board. It also provides
that the City Commission may file an appeal. To do so: · The item must be raised by a Commission member. · By motion, an action must be taken to place the item on the next meeting of
the Commission as an appealed item. REVIEW BY OTHERS Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of March 19, 2012 No appealable items were considered by the Planning and Zoning Board. The following
items which were considered by the Board will be forwarded to the City Commission for action: A. Recommended approval (6 to 1, Gerry Franciosa dissenting), of a City-initiated amendment
to the Land Development Regulations (LDR), by amending Article 7.9, “Docks, Dolphins, Finger Piers, and Boat Lifts”, by amending Section 7.9.5, “Standards for Approval”; to clarify current
language regarding docks. B. Recommended approval with conditions (7 to 0), of a conditional use request for Delray Gas Station (formerly known as Valero Gas Station) to allow the re-establishment
of the gasoline station with attendant food sales, at 14111 South Military Trail (west side of South Military Trail north of
Conklin Drive). C. Recommended approval (7 to 0), of a Future Land Use Map amendment (small-scale) from CMR (Commerce) to TRN (Transitional), rezoning from LI (Light Industrial) to NC
(Neighborhood Commercial), and text amendment to the Transitional Land Use Description for 10th & 10th Center, located at the southeast corner of SW 10th Street and SW 10th Avenue. D.
Recommended approval (7 to 0), of an amendment to the Wallace Drive Redevelopment Plan to allow neighborhood commercial retail and service uses as a principal use at 10th and 10th Center
(southeast corner of SW 10th Street and SW 10th Avenue). E. Recommended approval (7 to 0), of the Annexation, Future Land Use Map (small-scale) amendment from County MR-5 (Medium Residential
5 units per acre) to MD (Medium Density Residential 5-12 du/ac) and establishment of initial zoning of A (Agricultural) for a 3.13 acre parcel located at 13038 Barwick Road, (southeast
corner of Barwick Road and LWDD L-30 Canal). Site Plan Review and Appearance Board Meeting of March 28, 2012 1. Tabled (4 to 0, Shannon Dawson, Scott Porten and Nick Sadowsky absent),
an amendment to the blanket sign program for Delray Beach Shopping Center, located 1310 North Federal Highway, to allow Advance Auto Parts to use its corporate colors for a proposed
flat wall sign and tenant panel. 2. Approved with conditions (3 to 1, Alice Finst dissenting), a Class I site plan modification request associated with the installation of awnings for
The Palms, an existing multi-family building, located at 119 NE 7th Avenue. 3. Approved with conditions (3 to 1, Alice Finst dissenting), a Class I site plan modification request associated
with the installation of an awning for V & R Design located at 400 East Atlantic Avenue. Historic Preservation Board Meeting of March 21, 2012 4. Approved (6 to 0, Annette Smith stepped
down), a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a request for a color change for 20 West Atlantic Avenue, an existing commercial development within the Old School
Square Historic District. 5. Approved with conditions (7 to 0), a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a non-contributing structure and construction of
a new single family residence at 316 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive within the West Settlers Historic District. RECOMMENDATION By motion, receive and file this report. Attachment: Location
Map
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: David Boyd, Finance Director Patsy Nadal, Purchasing Manager THROUGH: David Harden, City Manager DATE: March 21, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA
ITEM 8.L.1 -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 BID AWARD/MULTIPLE VENDORS/MEDICAL AND DRUG SUPPLIES ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION City Commission is requested to make multiple awards
to bidders as stated below for the purchase of medical/drug supplies for the City of Delray Fire Operation, Ocean Rescue and Highland Beach at an estimated cost of $126,000, for the
balance of FY 11/12. Medications and medical supplies will be ordered “as needed”. BACKGROUND The City of Delray Beach is the lead entity for this joint bid with the City of Boynton
Beach. Bids were received on January 31, 2012 from eight (8) vendors, all in accordance with City purchasing policies. Criteria used for determining recommendation: Bound Tree Medical
and Henry Schein are sole bidders for Group 3 Emergency Medications. With the nationwide critical shortage of emergency medications, two source suppliers are a minimum requirement to
maintain compliance with chapter 401 of the Florida Statutes, and 64J of the Florida Administrative Code for ALS Providers. Midwest Medical Supply and Guardian Medical Products offer
competitive to lowest pricing in all other groups except for group 3. Ketron Health Care and QuadMed Inc. were low bidders for some items. Staff does not recommend award to QuadMed Inc.
due to past issues with deliveries. Also, staff does not recommend award to Ketron Health due to mixed reviews from references. The bids were reviewed by Steve Anderson, EMT-P, Division
Chief for the Fire Department and he recommends award to various vendors for the City of Delray Beach per attached email dated March 19, 2012 as follows: Bound Tree Medical, LLC Guardian
Medical Products Henry Schein, Inc. Midwest Medical Supply Co., LLC
Due to the way medical supplies are ordered (many times in large shipments with multiple items included), staff recommends authorization to purchase any of the items on the bid list
from the four vendors listed above for multiple item orders, regardless of whether a vendor is low bidder on one particular item. For single item orders, staff will purchase from whichever
of the four vendors listed above is the low bidder for that particular item providing the item is immediately available. FUNDING SOURCE 001-2315-526-52.20 001-2315-526-52.27 001-2313-522-52.20
001-2313-522-52.27 001-4123-572-52.20 001-4123-572-52.27 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends award to Bound Tree Medical, LLC, Guardian Medical Products, Henry Schein, Inc., and Midwest
Medical Supply Co., LLC as outline above and highlighted on the attached Tabulation of Bids for an estimated cost of $126,000.
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension GROUP 1 -AIRWAY MANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES Berman Oral Airways (1 -8) 1 Oral Airway 110 mm 29 bx $$$7.00
$203.00 $6.00 $174.00 $7.01 $203.29 $6.95 $201.55 $7.19 $208.51 $$$10.00 $290.00 #1147, bx of 50 2 Oral Airway 100 mm 29 bx $$$7.00 $203.00 $6.00 $174.00 $12.01 $348.29 $6.95 $201.55
$7.19 $208.51 $$$10.00 $290.00 #1148, bx of 50 3 Oral Airway 90 mm 29 bx $$$7.00 $203.00 $6.00 $174.00 $12.01 $348.29 $6.95 $201.55 $7.19 $208.51 $$$10.00 $290.00 #1149, bx of 50 4 Oral
Airway 80 mm 28 bx $$$7.00 $196.00 $6.00 $168.00 $12.01 $336.28 $6.95 $194.60 $7.19 $201.32 $$$10.00 $280.00 #1150, bx of 50 5 Oral Airway 70 mm 27 bx $$$7.00 $189.00 $6.00 $162.00 $12.51
$337.77 $6.95 $187.65 $7.19 $194.13 $$$10.00 $270.00 #121870, bx of 50 6 Oral Airway 60 mm 27 bx $$$7.00 $189.00 $6.00 $162.00 $12.51 $337.77 $6.95 $187.65 $7.19 $194.13 $$$10.00 $270.00
#1151, bx of 50 7 Oral Airway 50 mm 27 bx $$$7.00 $189.00 $6.00 $162.00 $12.01 $324.27 $6.95 $187.65 $7.19 $194.13 $$$10.00 $270.00 #121850, bx of 50 8 Oral Airway 40 mm 27 bx $$$7.00
$189.00 $6.00 $162.00 $12.51 $337.77 $6.95 $187.65 $7.19 $194.13 $$$10.00 $270.00 #1152, bx of 50 Rusch Ultra Robertazzi Nasal Airways (9 -17) 9 Nasal Airway 20 Fr 28 bx $$$17.90 $501.20
$14.40 $403.20 $17.41 $487.48 $14.50 $406.00 $14.70 $411.60 $$$19.74 $552.72 #507620, bx of 10 10 Nasal Airway 22 Fr 28 bx $$$17.90 $501.20 $14.40 $403.20 $17.41 $487.48 $14.50 $406.00
$14.70 $411.60 $$$19.74 $552.72 #507622, bx of 10 11 Nasal Airway 24 Fr 28 bx $$$17.90 $501.20 $14.40 $403.20 $17.41 $487.48 $14.50 $406.00 $14.70 $411.60 $$$19.74 $552.72 #507624, bx
of 10 12 Nasal Airway 26 Fr 28 bx $$$17.90 $501.20 $14.40 $403.20 $17.41 $487.48 $14.50 $406.00 $14.70 $411.60 $$$19.74 $552.72 #507626, bx of 10 13 Nasal Airway 28 Fr 29 bx $$$17.90
$519.10 $14.40 $417.60 $17.41 $504.89 $14.50 $420.50 $14.70 $426.30 $$$19.74 $572.46 #507628, bx of 10 14 Nasal Airway 30 Fr 29 bx $$$17.90 $519.10 $14.40 $417.60 $17.41 $504.89 $14.50
$420.50 $14.70 $426.30 $$$19.74 $572.46 #507630, bx of 10 15 Nasal Airway 32 Fr 19 bx $$$17.90 $340.10 $14.40 $273.60 $17.41 $330.79 $14.50 $275.50 $14.70 $279.30 $$$19.74 $375.06 #507632,
bx of 10 16 Nasal Airway 34 Fr 29 bx $$$17.90 $519.10 $14.40 $417.60 $17.41 $504.89 $14.50 $420.50 $14.70 $426.30 $$$19.74 $572.46 #507634, bx of 10 17 Nasal Airway 36 Fr 29 bx $$$17.90
$519.10 $14.40 $417.60 $17.41 $504.89 $14.50 $420.50 $14.70 $$$19.74 $572.46 #507636, bx of 10 Rusch E.T. Tubes with Pre-packaged Stylette-Latex Free (18 -30) 18 Uncuffed E.T. Tube 2.5
mm 2 bx $$$15.90 $31.80 $14.89 $29.78 $36.11 $72.22 $14.90 $29.80 $31.80 $426.30 $$$38.87 $77.74 #506525, bx of 10 19 Uncuffed E.T. Tube 3.0 mm 2 bx $$$15.90 $31.80 $14.89 $29.78 $36.11
$72.22 $14.90 $29.80 $14.35 $28.70 $$$38.87 $77.74 #506530, bx of 10 20 Uncuffed E.T. Tube 3.5 mm 2 bx $$$15.90 $31.80 $14.89 $29.78 $36.11 $72.22 $14.90 $29.80 $14.35 $28.70 $$$38.87
$77.74 #506535, bx of 10 21 Uncuffed E.T. Tube 4.0 mm 2 bx $$$15.90 $31.80 $14.89 $29.78 $36.11 $72.22 $14.90 $29.80 $14.35 $28.70 $$$38.87 $77.74 #506540, bx of 10 22 Uncuffed E.T.
Tube 4.5 mm 2 bx $$$15.90 $31.80 $14.89 $29.78 $36.11 $72.22 $14.90 $29.80 $14.35 $28.70 $$$38.87 $77.74 #506545, bx of 10 TabSheet02.03.2012 1
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 23 Uncuffed E.T. Tube 5.0 mm 2 bx $$$15.90 $31.80 $14.89 $29.78 $36.11 $72.22 $14.90 $29.80 $14.35 $28.70 $$$38.87
$77.74 #506550, bx of 10 24 Uncuffed E.T. Tube 5.5 mm 2 bx $$$15.90 $31.80 $14.89 $29.78 $34.81 $69.62 $14.90 $29.80 $14.70 $29.40 $$$38.87 $77.74 #506555, bx of 10 25 Uncuffed E.T.
Tube 6.0 mm 54 bx $$$15.90 $858.60 $14.89 $804.06 $39.81 $2,149.74 $16.50 $891.00 $14.70 $793.80 $$$38.87 $2,098.98 #506560, bx of 10 26 Uncuffed E.T. Tube 6.5 mm 54 bx $$$15.90 $858.60
$14.89 $804.06 $39.81 $2,149.74 $16.50 $891.00 $14.70 $793.80 $$$38.87 $2,098.98 #506565, bx of 10 27 Uncuffed E.T. Tube 7.0 mm 56 bx $$$15.90 $890.40 $14.89 $833.84 $39.81 $2,229.36
$16.50 $924.00 $14.70 $823.20 $$$38.87 $2,176.72 #506570, bx of 10 28 Uncuffed E.T. Tube 7.5 mm 56 bx $$$15.90 $890.40 $14.89 $833.84 $39.81 $2,229.36 $16.50 $924.00 $14.70 $823.20 $$$38.87
$2,176.72 #506575, bx of 10 29 Uncuffed E.T. Tube 8.0 mm 57 bx $$$15.90 $906.30 $14.89 $848.73 $39.81 $2,269.17 $16.50 $940.50 $14.70 $837.90 $$$38.87 $2,215.59 #506580, bx of 10 30
Uncuffed E.T. Tube 9.0 mm 53 bx $$$15.90 $842.70 $14.89 $789.17 $39.81 $2,109.93 $16.50 $874.50 $14.70 $779.10 $$$38.87 $2,060.11 #506590, bx of 10 Rusch Naso-Gastric Tubes (31 -36)
31 NG Tube 8 Fr 1 cs $$$36.00 $36.00 $47.50 $47.50 $37.51 $37.51 $72.00 $72.00 $37.45 $37.45 $$$46.00 $46.00 #235210, cs of 50 32 NG Tube 10 Fr 1 cs $$$36.00 $36.00 $47.50 $47.50 $97.51
$97.51 $72.00 $72.00 $37.45 $37.45 $$$46.00 $46.00 #235210, cs of 50 33 NG Tube 12 Fr 1 cs $$$36.00 $36.00 $47.50 $47.50 $97.51 $97.51 $72.00 $72.00 $37.45 $37.45 $$$46.00 $46.00 #235210,
cs of 50 34 NG Tube 14 Fr 1 cs $$$36.00 $36.00 $47.50 $47.50 $97.51 $97.51 $72.00 $72.00 $37.45 $37.45 $$$46.00 $46.00 #235210, cs of 50 35 NG Tube 16 Fr 1 cs $$$36.00 $36.00 $47.50
$47.50 $97.51 $97.51 $72.00 $72.00 $37.45 $37.45 $$$46.00 $46.00 #235210, cs of 50 36 NG Tube 18 Fr 1 cs $$$36.00 $36.00 $47.50 $47.50 $97.51 $97.51 $72.00 $72.00 $37.45 $37.45 $$$46.00
$46.00 #235210, cs of 50 37 E.T. Tube Holder Pediatric 5 cs $$$265.00 $1,325.00 $349.00 $1,745.00 $264.01 $1,320.05 $365.00 $1,825.00 $268.00 $1,340.00 $$$333.00 $1,665.00 Thomas E.T.
Tube Holder #04500, cs of 100 STI MEDICAL PRODUCTS NO SUBSTITUTES 38 E.T. Tube Holder Pediatric 11 cs $$$265.00 $2,915.00 $349.00 $3,839.00 $264.01 $2,904.11 $365.00 $4,015.00 $268.00
$2,948.00 $$$333.00 $3,663.00 Thomas E.T. Tube Holder #04400, cs of 100 STI MEDICAL PRODUCTS NO SUBSTITUTES 39 Cook Pneumo Kit Complete 25 ea $$$88.02 $2,200.50 $84.72 $2,118.00 $$$$$92.57
$2,314.25 $$$91.63 $2,290.75 Emergency Pneumothorax Set #Cook911 -COOK NO SUBSTITUTES 40 EID Syringe Model 4 bx $$$40.00 $160.00 $69.40 $277.60 $63.01 $252.04 $$$78.82 $315.28 $$$62.00
$248.00 Esophageal Intubation Detector #EID100, bx of 20 WOLF TROY MEDICAL NO SUBSTITUTES TabSheet02.03.2012 2
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 41 Lubricating jelly Packets 9 bx $$$7.27 $65.43 $9.29 $83.61 $6.95 $62.55 $7.99 $71.91 $5.86 $52.74 $$$5.56 $50.04
Airway Lubricants #00128, bx of 144 Johnson & Johnson/PDI or approved equal SunMed Disposable Fiber Optic Laryngoscope Blades -No Subsitude (42 -48) 42 Macintosh Child Size 2 50 ea $$$3.26
$163.00 $5.65 $282.50 $4.35 $217.50 $3.85 $192.50 $3.71 $185.50 $$$4.09 $204.50 #5-5332-02 43 Macintosh Child Size 3 110 ea $$$3.26 $358.60 $5.65 $621.50 $4.35 $478.50 $3.85 $423.50
$3.71 $408.10 $$$4.09 $449.90 #5-5332-03 44 Macintosh Child Size 4 110 ea $$$3.26 $358.60 $5.65 $621.50 $4.35 $478.50 $3.85 $423.50 $3.71 $408.10 $$$4.09 $449.90 #5-5332-04 45 Miller
Premature Size 0 50 ea $$$3.26 $163.00 $5.65 $282.50 $4.35 $217.50 $3.85 $192.50 $3.71 $185.50 $$$4.09 $204.50 #5-5333-00 46 Miller Infant Size 1 50 ea $$$3.26 $163.00 $5.65 $282.50
$4.35 $217.50 $3.85 $192.50 $3.71 $185.50 $$$4.09 $204.50 #5-5333-01 47 Miller Child Size 2 50 ea $$$3.26 $163.00 $5.65 $282.50 $4.35 $217.50 $3.85 $192.50 $3.71 $185.50 $$$4.09 $204.50
#5-5333-02 48 Miller Adult Size 3 130 ea $$$3.26 $423.80 $5.65 $734.50 $4.35 $565.50 $3.85 $500.50 $3.71 $482.30 $$$4.09 $531.70 #5-5333-03 49 Sun Med Greenline 20 ea $$$31.25 $625.00
$55.10 $1,102.00 $16.13 $322.60 $29.90 $598.00 $34.14 $682.80 $$$37.45 $749.00 Fiber Optic Handle, Penlite (Chrome-Plated Brass) 50 Sun Med Greenline 20 ea $$$31.25 $625.00 $55.10 $1,102.00
$16.13 $322.60 $29.90 $598.00 $34.14 $682.80 $$$37.45 $749.00 Fiber Optic Handle, Medium (Chrome-Plated Brass) 51 Yankaeur Suction Tip w/72” tubing 40 cs $$$22.60 $904.00 $25.88 $1,035.20
$28.61 $1,144.40 $21.10 $844.00 $25.40 $1,016.00 $$$26.80 $1,072.00 #50122, cs of 20 (Dynarex or approved equal) Rusch Soft Tip Suction Catheters (52 -58) 52 Suction Catheter 6 Fr 4
cs $$$7.50 $30.00 $10.35 $41.40 $17.01 $68.04 $11.50 $46.00 $8.82 $35.28 $$$19.50 $78.00 #40106, cs of 50 53 Suction Catheter 8 Fr 4 cs $$$7.50 $30.00 $10.35 $41.40 $17.01 $68.04 $11.50
$46.00 $8.82 $35.28 $$$19.50 $78.00 #40108, cs of 50 54 Suction Catheter 10 Fr 4 cs $$$7.50 $30.00 $10.35 $41.40 $17.01 $68.04 $11.50 $46.00 $8.82 $35.28 $$$19.50 $78.00 #40110, cs of
50 55 Suction Catheter 12 Fr 4 cs $$$7.50 $30.00 $10.35 $41.40 $17.01 $68.04 $11.50 $46.00 $8.82 $35.28 $$$19.50 $78.00 #40112, cs of 50 56 Suction Catheter 14 Fr 4 cs $$$7.50 $30.00
$10.35 $41.40 $17.01 $68.04 $11.50 $46.00 $8.82 $35.28 $$$19.50 $78.00 #40114, cs of 50 57 Suction Catheter 16 Fr 4 cs $$$7.50 $30.00 $10.35 $41.40 $17.01 $68.04 $11.50 $46.00 $8.82
$35.28 $$$19.50 $78.00 #40116, cs of 50 58 Suction Catheter 18 Fr 4 cs $$$7.50 $30.00 $10.35 $41.40 $17.01 $68.04 $11.50 $46.00 $8.82 $35.28 $$$19.50 $78.00 #40118, cs of 50 59 Catheter
& Sleeve 18Fr 4 cs $$$63.09 $252.36 $52.12 $208.48 $117.70 $470.80 $$$62.34 $249.36 $$$93.50 $374.00 #T162C, cs of 50 (Pharmaseal or approved equal) TabSheet02.03.2012 3
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 60 O2 Tree-Plastic Replacement 50 ea $$$0.39 $19.50 $0.50 $25.00 $0.45 $22.50 $0.34 $17.00 $0.35 $17.50 $$$0.58
$29.00 #2555, price per ea Precision Medical or appr equal 61 Aspirator, Meconium 24 ea $$$4.17 $100.08 $10.53 $252.72 $3.94 $94.56 $4.29 $102.96 $4.20 $100.80 $$$4.09 $98.16 #0101,
price per ea (Neotech or approved equal) 62 Cushion Disposable Mask 2 cs $$$43.50 $87.00 $81.50 $163.00 $41.11 $82.22 $23.19 $46.38 $46.59 $93.18 $$$49.20 $98.40 Pediatric Mask #158200,
cs of 30 (Rusch or approved equal) 63 Cushion Disposable Mask 5 cs $$$43.50 $217.50 $81.50 $407.50 $41.11 $205.55 $23.19 $115.95 $46.59 $232.95 $$$49.20 $246.00 Adult Mask #158600, cs
of 30 (Rusch or approved equal) 64 Bulb Syringe 2 oz. 2 cs $$$35.50 $71.00 $44.50 $89.00 $40.01 $80.02 $18.95 $37.90 $32.28 $64.56 $$$44.50 $89.00 #70275, cs of 50 (Medline or approved
equal) 65 Single Patient 20 cs $$$61.80 $1,236.00 $119.50 $2,390.00 $57.25 $1,145.00 $$$69.36 $1,387.20 $$$69.00 $1,380.00 Vent Circuit #6220, cs of 12 Rusch Disposable Mannual Resuscitator
-No Substitute (66 -68) 66 Adult BVM 250 ea $$$11.44 $2,860.00 $10.50 $2,625.00 $12.48 $3,120.00 $12.69 $3,172.50 $13.08 $3,270.00 $$$10.23 $2,557.50 w/Bag Reservoir, Mask & Tubing 157100300
67 Pediatric BVM 200 ea $$$11.44 $2,288.00 $10.50 $2,100.00 $15.39 $3,078.00 $15.81 $3,162.00 $13.08 $2,616.00 $$$15.50 $3,100.00 w/Bag Reservoir, Mask & Tubing 157300100 68 Infant BVM
150 ea $$$11.44 $1,716.00 $10.50 $1,575.00 $14.94 $2,241.00 $16.19 $2,428.50 $13.08 $1,962.00 $$$14.80 $2,220.00 w/Bag Reservoir, Mask & Tubing 157400100 69 CPR Microshield 12 cs $$$222.50
$2,670.00 $267.82 $3,213.84 $223.51 $2,682.12 $94.50 $1,134.00 $231.70 $2,780.40 $$$280.50 $3,366.00 Tamper Evident Pouch #70-155, cs of 50 70 Nasal Cannulas Pediatric 3 cs $$$17.00
$51.00 $16.00 $48.00 $10.79 $32.37 $13.39 $40.17 $18.95 $56.85 $$$19.50 $58.50 w/tubing , cs of 50 Hudson #1101 71 Medium Concentration Mask 3 cs $$$39.00 $117.00 $52.32 $156.96 $60.01
$180.03 $24.50 $73.50 $27.27 $81.81 $$$37.50 $112.50 Pediatric w/tubing, cs of 50 Hudson #1035 72 Medium Concentration Mask 1 cs $$$72.50 $72.50 $99.50 $99.50 $144.51 $144.51 $47.19
$47.19 $38.66 $38.66 $$$43.50 $43.50 Infant w/tubing, cs of 50 Life Support Products #6218 or approved equal 73 Non-Breathing Mask w/safety vent 56 cs $$$50.50 $2,828.00 $39.50 $2,212.00
$59.01 $3,304.56 $33.19 $1,858.64 $35.80 $2,004.80 $$$30.50 $1,708.00 Adult w/tubing, cs of 50 Hudson #1059 74 Aerosol Mask -Adult Mask Only 3 cs $$$23.31 $69.93 $47.50 $142.50 $22.51
$67.53 $21.89 $65.67 $18.78 $56.34 $$$28.00 $84.00 #64083, cs of 50 Life Support Prod or appr equal 75 Micromist Nebulizer 308 cs $$$41.00 $12,628.00 $45.55 $14,029.40 $40.51 $12,477.08
$38.19 $11,762.52 $30.68 $9,449.44 $$$36.50 $11,242.00 Complete Hand Held Kit Hudson #1883, cs of 50 TabSheet02.03.2012 4
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 76 Disposable Suction Canister 6 cs $$$344.00 $2,064.00 $347.02 $2,082.12 $328.67 $1,972.02 $211.00 $1,266.00 $362.54
$2,175.24 $$$343.50 $2,061.00 For Impact #305C, cs of 50 IMPACT-NO SUBSTITUTE 77 Nasal Cannulas Adult 102 cs $$$14.00 $1,428.00 $14.50 $1,479.00 $8.99 $916.98 $12.95 $1,320.90 $13.00
$1,326.00 $$$27.50 $2,805.00 w/tubing , cs of 50 Hudson #1104 78 King Airway Kit 20 ea $$$26.79 $535.80 $35.12 $702.40 $32.60 $652.00 $$$$$$$36.95 $739.00 LT-D, size 2 79 King Airway
Kit 20 ea $$$24.40 $488.00 $35.12 $702.40 $30.91 $618.20 $$$$$$$31.95 $639.00 LT-D, size 3 80 King Airway Kit 20 ea $$$24.40 $488.00 $35.12 $702.40 $30.91 $618.20 $$$$$$$31.95 $639.00
LT-D, size 4 81 King Airway Kit 20 ea $$$24.40 $488.00 $35.12 $702.40 $30.91 $618.20 $$$$$$$31.95 $639.00 LT-D, size 5 82 O2 RESQ BITRAC ED MASK 10 cs $$$341.50 $3,415.00 $578.50 $5,785.00
$$$$$$$$$61.95 $619.50 w/3 set valve (5.0/7.5/10.0 cm) & Flow Generator, Adult Mask 10 per cs GROUP 1 GRAND TOTAL $$58,681.50 $3,836.00 $66,895.29 $3,441.25 $65,059.88 $2,359.19 $48,260.14
$2,593.94 $50,085.29 $$$3,523.34 $68,983.41 (Items 1 -82) PERCENTAGE DISCOUNT OFF LIST PRICE FOR ITEMS SIMILAR TO, BUT NOT LISTED IN THIS GROUP: 0% 10.0% 15.6% 0.0% 0% 0.0% 15.0% GROUP
2 -INTRAVENOUS SUPPLIES: Protective IV -Plus Safety I.V. Catheter (78 -83) 83 14 Gauge x 1.25” 50 bx $$$81.00 $4,050.00 $$$87.06 $4,353.00 $88.89 $4,444.50 $84.78 $4,239.00 $$$82.49
$4,124.50 #3068, bx of 50 84 16 Gauge x 1.25” 50 bx $$$81.00 $4,050.00 $$$87.06 $4,353.00 $88.89 $4,444.50 $84.78 $4,239.00 $$$82.49 $4,124.50 #3062, bx of 50 85 18 Gauge x 1.25” 80
bx $$$81.00 $6,480.00 $$$87.06 $6,964.80 $88.89 $7,111.20 $84.78 $6,782.40 $$$82.49 $6,599.20 #3065, bx of 50 86 20 Gauge x 1.25” 70 bx $$$81.00 $5,670.00 $$$87.06 $6,094.20 $88.89 $6,222.30
$84.78 $5,934.60 $$$82.49 $5,774.30 #3066, bx of 50 87 22 Gauge x 1” 44 bx $$$81.00 $3,564.00 $$$87.01 $3,828.44 $88.89 $3,911.16 $84.78 $3,730.32 $$$82.49 $3,629.56 #3060, bx of 50
88 24 Gauge x .75” 40 bx $$$87.50 $3,500.00 $$$87.06 $3,482.40 $88.89 $3,555.60 $84.78 $3,391.20 $$$82.49 $3,299.60 #3063, bx of 50 89 Veni-Gards Adults 10 bx $$$35.71 $357.10 $$$89.89
$898.90 $42.50 $425.00 $73.32 $733.20 $$$70.18 $701.80 #7054431, bx of 200 -Conmed NO SUBSTITUTES 90 Select-3 I.V. System + NIS + LAS 50 cs $$$269.28 $13,464.00 $$$257.28 $12,864.00
$$$287.79 $14,389.50 $$$312.00 $15,600.00 #B-32-102 cs of 48 -Biomedix NO SUBSTITUTES 91 I.V. Start Kit Latex Free -EMP 50 cs $$$94.00 $4,700.00 $$$91.01 $4,550.50 $$$114.84 $5,742.00
$$$$NO SUBSTITUTES 92 Buretrol Solution Set 150 mL Burette 1 cs $$$320.64 $320.64 $$$302.57 $302.57 $$$130.95 $130.95 $$$$(Ball Value) and 2 injection sites #2C7546, cs of 48 (Baxter
or approved equal) TabSheet02.03.2012 5
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 93 Medic-Plastic Anti-Stick 20 bx $$$110.00 $2,200.00 $$$115.01 $2,300.20 $$$139.62 $2,792.40 $$$228.00 $4,560.00
#NF9285, bx of 500 (B.Braun) 94 Extension Set w/Ultrasite Injection Site, 400 ea $$$3.00 $1,200.00 $$$2.82 $1,128.00 $$$2.77 $1,108.00 $$$$and SafeLine injection Site on T-Port #470060
(B.Braun-No Substitutes) 95 0.9% Sodium Chloride Inj.,USP 10 cs $$$112.48 $1,124.80 $$$106.37 $1,063.70 $$$130.56 $1,305.60 $$$$50 mL, 96 per cs NDC 0338-0049-41 96 0.9% Sodium Chloride
Inj.,USP 280 cs $$$19.20 $5,376.00 $$$31.21 $8,738.80 $$$22.40 $6,272.00 $$$$500 mL, 24 per cs NDC 0338-0049-03 97 0.9% Sodium Chloride Inj.,USP 40 cs $$$12.60 $504.00 $$$13.31 $532.40
$$$16.20 $648.00 $$$$1000 mL, 14 per cs NDC 46163-300-10 98 5% Dextrose Inj., USP 20 cs $$$30.60 $612.00 $$$65.89 $1,317.80 $$$30.76 $615.20 $$$$250 mL, 36 per cs NDC 54868-0296-2 99
10% Dextrose Inj., USP 250 mL, 20 ea $$$1.98 $39.60 $$$1.86 $37.20 $$$1.82 $36.40 $$$$NDC 0338-0023-02 100 Disposable Padded Board 10 cs $$$62.00 $620.00 $$$80.01 $800.10 $$$69.78 $697.80
$$$70.61 $706.10 With Vinyl cs 3” x 9” #95021, cs of 100 101 Disposable Padded Board 10 cs $$$60.00 $600.00 $$$105.01 $1,050.10 $$$104.58 $1,045.80 $$$107.89 $1,078.90 With Vinyl cs
3” x 08” #95022, cs of 100 102 Webcol I.V. prep Pads 34 bx $$$1.53 $52.02 $$$1.22 $41.48 $2.10 $71.40 $1.29 $43.86 $$$1.52 $51.68 Medium, #6818 bx of 200 (Kendall or approved equal)
103 Tourniquets Latex-Free 10 pkg $$$87.00 $870.00 $$$8.23 $82.30 $2.25 $22.50 $1.65 $16.50 $$$3.80 $38.00 #45018, Package of 25 Vanishpoint Syrings -No Substitude (104 -105) 104 1 cc,
21 gauge x 1” 40 bx $$$67.82 $2,712.80 $$$70.09 $2,803.60 $$$50.75 $2,030.00 $$$$#10161, bx of 100 105 3 cc, 21 gauge x 1.5” 40 bx $$$55.88 $2,235.20 $$$41.96 $1,678.40 $$$44.75 $1,790.00
$$$$#10361, bx of 100 106 10 cc, 21 gauge x 1.5” 40 bx $$$117.65 $4,706.00 $$$52.13 $2,085.20 $$$55.55 $2,222.00 $$$$# 11061, bx of 100 107 Luer Lock Syringe w/needle 20 bx $$$11.00
$220.00 $$$15.18 $303.60 $$$8.41 $168.20 $$$8.19 $163.80 1 cc tube, 25 gauge x 5/8” needle 100 per bx (B-D 309626 or approved equal) 108 21 gauge x ¾” w/12” tube 1 bx $$$22.00 $22.00
$$$10.01 $10.01 $$$10.44 $10.44 $$$19.30 $19.30 Excel Winged Infusion Set #26704, bx of 50 109 23 gauge x ¾” w/12” tube 1 bx $$$22.00 $22.00 $$$50.50 $50.50 $$$10.44 $10.44 $$$19.30
$19.30 Excel Winged Infusion Set #367283, bx of 50 TabSheet02.03.2012 6
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 110 25 gauge x ¾” w/12” tube 1 bx $$$22.00 $22.00 $$$10.28 $10.28 $$$10.44 $10.44 $$$19.30 $19.30 Excel Winged Infusion
Set #26708, bx of 50 111 0.9% Sodium Chloride Inj., USP 1000 ea $$$0.36 $360.00 $$$0.84 $840.00 $$$0.38 $380.00 $$$$10cc, Prefilled-Luer Lock Syringe w/rubber stopper 112 Standard Terumo
5 bx $$$13.00 $65.00 $$$9.42 $47.10 $$$7.93 $39.65 $$$9.36 $46.80 10cc Syringe Luer Lock without needle SS-10L, bx of 100 113 30-35cc Luer Lock 1 cs $$$102.50 $102.50 $$$16.95 $16.95
$$$15.06 $15.06 $$$8.19 $8.19 Syringe Only #26290, bx of 50, cs of 5 bx 114 50 cc Syringe c Eccentric Tip, 3 pkg $$$12.18 $36.54 $$$16.17 $48.51 $$$11.26 $33.78 $$$$25 per pack # 26301
BX/25 (Excel or approved equal) 115 Filter Straw 5 Micron 100 bx $$$0.50 $50.00 $$$0.46 $46.00 $$$0.3662 $36.62 $$$49.12 $4,912.00 1.7” #415021 #26265, bx of 100 (B.Braun or approved
equal) GROUP 2 GRAND TOTAL $69,908.20 $$72,724.04 $30,208.16 $1,862.79 $70,640.36 $$55,476.83 (Items 83 -115) $580.19 PERCENTAGE DISCOUNT OFF LIST PRICE FOR ITEMS SIMILAR TO, BUT NOT
LISTED IN THIS GROUP: 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% GROUP 3 -MEDICATIONS: 116 Adenosine Inj., USP 90 ea $$$4.15 $373.50 $$$3.40 $306.00 $$$$$$$$6 mg/2mL vial NDC 55390-067-10 117 Adenosine Inj.,
USP 90 ea $$$9.16 $824.40 $$$2.82 $253.80 $$$$$$$$12 mg/4mL vial NDC 55390-068-01 118 Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Solution 500 ea $$$0.22 $110.00 $$$0.20 $100.00 $$$$$$$$0.083%, 2.5mg/3
mL vial Individually wrapped NDC 0487-9501-01 9 (no substitutes) 119 Amiodarone HCI Inj., USP 300 ea $$$1.71 $513.00 $$$1.82 $546.00 $$$$$$$$150 mg/3mL, vial NDC 67457-153-03 120 Ammonia
Inhalants 60 bx $$$2.10 $126.00 $$$1.42 $85.20 $1.79 $107.40 $$$$$$0.3 mL, bx of 10 NDC 46414-3333-2 121 Aspirin Chewable 70 btl $$$0.80 $56.00 $$$0.70 $49.00 $$$$$$$$81 mg, 36 Tablet
Bottle NDC 57896-911-36 122 Atropine Inj., USP 40 ea $$$23.00 $920.00 $$$14.06 $562.40 $$$$$$$$400 mcg/mL, 20mLvial NDC 0641-2210-43 123 Atropine Inj., USP 300 ea $$$2.50 $750.00 $$$3.45
$1,035.00 $$$$$$$$1 mg, 10 mL w/Luer Lock NDC 0548-3339-00 TabSheet02.03.2012 7
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 124 Calcium Chloride Inj., USP 100 ea $$$2.45 $245.00 $$$1.89 $189.00 $$$$$$$$10%, 100mg/mL, w/Luer Lock NDC 0548-3304-00
125 Calcium Guconate Inj., USP 30 ea $$$2.43 $72.90 $$$2.95 $88.50 $$$$$$$$10%, 1g/10mL vial NDC 0517-3910-25 126 Diphenhydramine 200 ea $$$1.03 $206.00 $$$0.88 $176.00 $$$$$$$$50 mg,
1 mL vial NDC 63323-0664-01 127 Dextrose Inj., USP 30 ea $$$2.90 $87.00 $$$5.11 $153.30 $$$$$$$$2.5 gm., 10mL w/Luer Lock NDC 0548-3315-00 128 Dextrose Inj., USP 400 ea $$$3.65 $1,460.00
$$$5.40 $2,160.00 $$$$$$$$25 gm., 50 mL w/Luer Lock NDC 0548-3301-00 129 Diltiazem HCI Inj., USP 20 bx $$$22.00 $440.00 $$$8.49 $169.80 $$$$$$$$25 mg/5 mL, 10vial/bx NDC 0703-1553-03
130 Dopamine HCI Inj., USP 100 ea $$$0.81 $81.00 $$$0.91 $91.00 $$$$$$$$400 mg/10 mL NDC 0409-9104-20 131 Epinephrine Inj., USP 100 ea $$$1.15 $115.00 $$$1.35 $135.00 $$$$$$$$1:1000,
1mg/mL Ampule NDC 0409-7241-01 132 Epinephrine Inj., USP 600 ea $$$2.20 $1,320.00 $$$3.49 $2,094.00 $$$$$$$$1:1000, 1mg/10, w/Luer Lock NDC 0548-3316-00 133 Etomide Inj., USP 70 ea $$$10.95
$766.50 $$$7.88 $551.60 $$$$$$$$20 mg /10 mL, vial NDC 04096-695-01 134 Glucagen (Glucogon-DNA origin) 50 ea $$$102.00 $5,100.00 $$$100.57 $5,028.50 $$$$$$$$Package containing 1 I.U.
Glucagon 1 mg/mL sterile H2O for reconstitution NDC 55390-004-01 135 Insta-Glucose 50 ea $$$3.26 $163.00 $$$4.83 $241.50 $3.99 $199.50 $$$$$$31g/tube 136 Ketamine HCI Inj., USP 30 ea
$$$5.55 $166.50 $$$11.13 $333.90 $$$$$$$$500mg/mL, 10 vial/bx NDC 67457-001-10 137 Lidocaine Inj., USP 70 ea $$$2.45 $171.50 $$$2.33 $163.10 $$$$$$$$2%, 100 mg/5 mL, Luer Lock NDC 0548-3390-00
138 Magnesium Sulfate Inj., USP 50 ea $$$1.15 $57.50 $$$1.30 $65.00 $$$$$$$$1g/2 mL vial NDC 0517-2602-25 139 Mark 1 Antidote Kit 20 ea $$$39.00 $780.00 $$$23.64 $472.80 $$$$$$$$2 mg
Atropine, 600 mg 2 PAMCL NDC 11704-101-01 TabSheet02.03.2012 8
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 140 Methylene Blue Inj., USP 20 ea $$$7.44 $148.80 $$$6.18 $123.60 $$$$$$$$1%, 10 mg/mL NDC 61703-402-32 141 Midazolam
HCI Inj., USP 10 bx $$$12.81 $128.10 $$$156.42 $1,564.20 $$$$$$$$5 mg/5 mL, 10 vial/bx NDC 10019-028-37 142 Morphine Sulfate Inj., USP 30 ea $$$1.26 $37.80 $$$1.11 $33.30 $$$$$$$$10
mg/mL, 25 vials/bx NDC 10019-178-44 143 Naloxone Inj., USP 500 ea $$$14.20 $7,100.00 $$$19.16 $9,580.00 $$$$$$$$2 mg/2 mL, w/Luer Lock NDC 0548-3369-00 144 Nitro Sublingual Tablets 70
blt $$$9.83 $688.10 $$$0.46 $32.20 $$$$$$$$0.4 mg, 25 Tablets Bottle NDC 54868-1508-1 145 Ordansetron HCI Inj., USP 30 bx $$$15.00 $450.00 $$$2.25 $67.50 $$$$$$$$4 mg/2 mL, 5 vial/bx
NDC 0409-4755-03 146 Sodium Bicarbonate Inj.,USP 60 ea $$$5.63 $337.80 $$$2.79 $167.40 $$$$$$$$4.2%, 5 meg/10 mL, w/Luer Lock NDC 0548-3331-00 147 Sodium Bicarbonate Inj., USP 300 ea
$$$2.88 $864.00 $$$2.68 $804.00 $$$$$$$$8.4%, 50 mL, w/Luer Lock NDC 0548-3352-00 148 Succinylchlorine Chloride Inj., USP 30 ea $$$2.35 $70.50 $$$1.73 $51.90 $$$$$$$$200 mg/10 mL, vial
NDC 0409-6629-02 149 Teracaine HCI 75 ea $$$8.50 $637.50 $$$7.59 $569.25 $$$$$$$$Opthalmic Solution USP, 0.5% 15 mL bottle NDC 24208-920-64 150 Vasopressin Inj., USP 10 bx $$$148.25
$1,482.50 $$$59.00 $590.00 $$$$$$$$20 Units/mL, 25 vial/bx NDC 0517-0510-25 GROUP 3 GRAND TOTAL $$26,849.90 $$28,633.75 $5.78 $306.90 $$$(Items 116 -150) PERCENTAGE DISCOUNT OFF LIST
PRICE FOR ITEMS SIMILAR TO, BUT NOT LISTED IN THIS GROUP: 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% GROUP 4 -DIAGNOSTICS AND INSTRUMENTS: 151 Blood Pressure Cuffs 30 bx $$$47.50 $1,425.00 $74.00 $2,220.00
$33.61 $1,008.30 $$$72.85 $2,185.50 $$$$Double Tube Disposable Child Size ZCC4412L -10/bx (Zefon or approved equal) 152 Blood Pressure Cuffs 40 bx $$$64.50 $2,580.00 $74.00 $2,960.00
$33.61 $1,344.40 $$$74.28 $2,971.20 $$$$Double Tube Disposable Small Adult Size ZCC4312L -10/bx (Zefon or approved equal) TabSheet02.03.2012 9
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 153 Blood Pressure Cuffs 125 bx $$$64.50 $8,062.50 $74.00 $9,250.00 $43.85 $5,481.25 $$$75.62 $9,452.50 $$$$Double
Tube Disposable Adult Size ZCC4212L -10/bx (Zefon or approved equal) 154 Blood Pressure Cuffs 115 bx $$$64.50 $7,417.50 $74.00 $8,510.00 $55.37 $6,367.55 $$$79.72 $9,167.80 $$$$Double
Tube Disposable Large Adult Size ZCC4112L -10/bx (Zefon or approved equal) 155 Blood Pressure Cuffs 5 bx $$$85.60 $428.00 $158.53 $792.65 $79.83 $399.15 $$$91.26 $456.30 $$$$Double Tube
Disposable Thigh ZCC4012L -10/bx (Zefon or approved equal) 156 Blood Pressure Cuffs 5 bx $$$20.60 $103.00 $74.00 $370.00 $80.91 $404.55 $$$34.04 $170.20 $$$$Single Tube Disposable Child
Size ZSC4401MQF -10/bx (Zefon or approved equal) 157 Blood Pressure Cuffs 20 bx $$$23.10 $462.00 $74.00 $1,480.00 $98.81 $1,976.20 $$$35.37 $707.40 $$$$Single Tube Disposable Small Adult
Size ZSC4301MQF -10/bx (Zefon or approved equal) 158 Blood Pressure Cuffs 20 bx $$$31.60 $632.00 $74.00 $1,480.00 $98.91 $1,978.20 $$$36.81 $736.20 $$$$Single Tube Disposable Adult Size
ZSC4201MQF -10/bx (Zefon or approved equal) 159 Blood Pressure Cuffs 20 bx $$$36.10 $722.00 $74.00 $1,480.00 $98.81 $1,976.20 $$$40.81 $816.20 $$$$Single Tube Disposable Large Adult
Size ZSC4101MQF -10/bx (Zefon or approved equal) 160 Blood Pressure Cuffs 10 bx $$$69.90 $699.00 $87.50 $875.00 $134.81 $1,348.10 $$$52.45 $524.50 $$$$Single Tube Disposable Thigh ZSC4001MQF
-10/bx (Zefon or approved equal) 161 Blood Pressure Bulbs 100 ea $$$3.12 $312.00 $3.25 $325.00 $2.98 $298.00 $1.69 $169.00 $2.88 $288.00 $$$3.58 $358.00 With valves #875 (ADC or approved
equal) 162 Sphygmomanometer Gauges 600 ea $$$7.14 $4,284.00 $10.97 $6,582.00 $7.19 $4,314.00 $3.49 $2,094.00 $7.05 $4,230.00 $$$4.68 $2,808.00 (ADC or approved equal) 163 Stethoscopes-ProScope
670 200 ea $$$3.75 $750.00 $4.68 $936.00 $4.48 $896.00 $$$4.25 $850.00 $$$5.82 $1,164.00 22” Tubing, Color-Pink (No Substitute) 164 Penlights 100 pks $$$5.02 $502.00 $4.11 $411.00 $4.64
$464.00 $3.05 $305.00 $4.21 $421.00 $$$4.91 $491.00 #59805, Disposable, 6 per pack (Moore or approved equal) 165 Morgan Mor-Flex Lens 6 bx $$$233.64 $1,401.84 $385.00 $2,310.00 $222.49
$1,334.94 $269.00 $1,614.00 $245.05 $1,470.30 $$$257.52 $1,545.12 MT2000, 12 per bx (Mortran or approved equal) TabSheet02.03.2012 10
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 166 Electrodes 7 cs $$$168.00 $1,176.00 $111.60 $781.20 $95.52 $668.64 $$$96.59 $676.13 $$$166.00 $1,162.00 Pediatric,
3 per pkg 200 packages per cs (KENDALL 31439766-No Substitute) 167 Electrodes 200 cs $$$196.20 $39,240.00 $240.00 $48,000.00 $114.62 $22,924.00 $$$94.77 $18,954.00 $$$187.50 $37,500.00
Postrace Diaphoretic Adult, 40 per bx, 30 bx per cs 1870C-004 (ConMed-No Substitude) 168 Prep Razors 40 bx $$$16.50 $660.00 $6.35 $254.00 $18.55 $742.00 $11.99 $479.60 $17.01 $680.40
$$$17.31 $692.40 #4251, 50 per bx (Nikomed or approved equal) 169 Magill Forceps 24 ea $$$9.01 $216.24 $4.60 $110.40 $3.09 $74.16 $2.55 $61.20 $4.77 $114.48 $$$2.99 $71.76 #82760, 11”
Adult Stainless Steel 170 Magill Forceps 12 ea $$$9.00 $108.00 $4.60 $55.20 $3.44 $41.28 $2.39 $28.68 $4.77 $57.24 $$$2.99 $35.88 #82750, 8” Child Stainless Steel (EMP or approved equal)
171 Kelly Forceps 24 ea $$$1.41 $33.84 $1.32 $31.68 $1.07 $25.68 $0.89 $21.36 $1.82 $43.68 $$$0.99 $23.76 Hemostats #724000 Straight 5-1/2” Stainless Steel (EMP or approved equal) 172
Ring Cutter 20 ea $$$5.02 $100.40 $5.75 $115.00 $5.63 $112.60 $3.19 $63.80 $11.55 $231.00 $$$3.51 $70.20 #8220, Stainless Steel (EMP or approved equal) 173 Replacement Blade 20 ea $$$1.26
$25.20 $1.47 $29.40 $1.22 $24.40 $0.79 $15.80 $4.46 $89.20 $$$1.99 $39.80 for #8221 Ring Cutter (EMP or approved equal) 174 Trauma Utility Sheers 280 ea $$0.85 $238.00 $0.87 $243.60
$0.89 $249.20 $0.67 $187.60 $1.14 $319.20 $$$0.77 $215.60 #139, 7.25” Black (EMP or approved equal) GROUP 4 GRAND TOTAL $$71,578.52 $1,622.60 $89,602.13 $54,452.80 $299.70 $5,040.04
$1,093.53 $55,612.43 $$46,177.52 (Items 151 -174) PERCENTAGE DISCOUNT OFF LIST PRICE FOR ITEMS SIMILAR TO, BUT NOT LISTED IN THIS GROUP: 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% GROUP 5 -SPLINTS, IMMOBILIZATION
SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT: 175 Ambu Perfit Ace Extrication 42 cs $$$120.00 $5,040.00 $$$129.61 $5,443.62 $$$162.92 $6,842.64 $$$178.95 $7,515.90 Collar, 30 PER cs (AMBU-No Substitute) 176
Ambu Mini Ace 9 cs $$$120.00 $1,080.00 $$$129.61 $1,166.49 $$$162.92 $1,466.28 $$$198.30 $1,784.70 Adjustable Collar, 30 per cs Infant, Pediatric and Geriatric Settings (AMBU-No Substitude)
177 Disposable Restraint Straps 788 ea $$$2.04 $1,607.52 $$$2.14 $1,686.32 $1.59 $1,252.92 $2.21 $1,741.48 $$$1.48 $1,166.24 5’-Orange & Blue Two-piece Restraint with Loop-Lok #454390
(Dixie or approved equal) TabSheet02.03.2012 11
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 178 Infant/Pediatric Immobilization 2 ea $$$267.04 $534.08 $$$260.87 $521.74 $$$398.07 $796.14 $$$184.00 $368.00
Board with Carrying cs #D6368 (LSP or approved equal) 179 Replacement Head Harness for 4 ea $$$58.21 $232.84 $$$67.58 $270.32 $$$81.67 $326.68 $$$11.60 $46.40 Infant/Pediatric Immobilization
Board 180 K.E.D. Complete Kit #125 3 ea $$$72.65 $217.95 $$$76.69 $230.07 $$$97.27 $291.81 $$$87.72 $263.16 Kendrick Extrication Device (FERNO-No Substitute) 181 Traction Splint 2 ea
$$$308.14 $616.28 $$$297.78 $595.56 $$$495.00 $990.00 $$$299.42 $598.84 Sager form III bilateral, Model S304 (SAGER-No Substitute) 182 Traction Splint 2 ea $$$262.35 $524.70 $$$250.59
$501.18 $$$414.50 $829.00 $$$260.82 $521.64 Sager Pediatric, Model S300 (SAGER-No Substitute) 183 Scoop Stretcher 2 ea $$$629.80 $1,259.60 $$$644.20 $1,288.40 $$$708.19 $1,416.38 $$$645.96
$1,291.92 Combicarrier II CC 2200P NO SUBSTITUTE 184 Disposable Posey Restraints 100 pr $$$3.29 $329.00 $$$6.31 $631.00 $$$3.56 $356.00 $$$3.06 $306.00 Limb Holder #2510, Price per pair
-Posey NO SUBSTITUTES 185 Acrylic Cot Blankets 60 ea $$$7.78 $466.80 $$$10.40 $624.00 $$$8.12 $487.20 $$$4.56 $273.60 #7744, 60” W x 84” L, Blue (Chatham or approved equal) 186 Disposable
Blanket 15 cs $$$62.15 $932.25 $$$70.33 $1,054.95 $59.75 $896.25 $38.64 $579.60 $$$44.16 $662.40 #5480, 56” x 90” 24 per cs (Banta or approved equal) 187 Pillow Disposable IM2025 18
cs $$$46.32 $833.76 $$$62.17 $1,119.06 $39.60 $712.80 $54.00 $972.00 $$$84.00 $1,512.00 #IM2025, 17” x 23” 24 per cs (Putnam or approved equal) 188 Two Piece Cot Straps 24 ea $$$17.29
$414.96 $$$15.74 $377.76 $$$19.00 $456.00 $$$6.94 $166.56 #430, Maroon -Ferno NO SUBSTITUTES 189 Econo-Vac Splint 5 st $$$132.08 $660.40 $$$126.16 $630.80 $$$136.04 $680.20 $$$163.74
$818.70 Deluxe 5 Splint Kit MEDICAL DEVICES INT’L NO SUBSTITUTES 190 Econo-Vac Splint 24 ea $$$15.75 $378.00 $$$15.05 $361.20 $$$16.22 $389.28 $$$20.12 $482.88 #82-E2010 191 Econo-Vac
Splint 24 ea $$$16.96 $407.04 $$$16.21 $389.04 $$$17.47 $419.28 $$$21.64 $519.36 #82-E2014 192 Econo-Vac Splint 24 ea $$$7.27 $174.48 $$$6.95 $166.80 $$$7.48 $179.52 $$$8.32 $199.68
#82-E2222 TabSheet02.03.2012 12
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 193 Sta-Blok Head Immobilizer 75 cs $$$116.40 $8,730.00 $$$112.81 $8,460.75 $$$130.49 $9,786.75 $$$152.40 $11,430.00
Laderal NO SUBSTITUTES GROUP 5 GRAND TOTAL $$24,439.66 $$25,519.06 $2,861.97 $2,953.77 $29,006.24 $$29,927.98 (Items 175 -193) $100.94 PERCENTAGE DISCOUNT OFF LIST PRICE FOR ITEMS SIMILAR
TO, BUT NOT LISTED IN THIS GROUP: 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% GROUP 6 -BANDAGES AND DRESSING TAPE: 194 Dermicel Hypo-Allergenic 8 cs $$$96.48 $771.84 $99.81 $798.48 $92.77 $742.16 $81.90 $655.20
$98.79 $790.32 $$$92.40 $739.20 Cloth Tape 1”, #5144 12 rolls per bx, 12 bx per cs (J & J or approved equal) 195 Dermicel Hypo-Allergenic 11 cs $$$96.48 $1,061.28 $99.81 $1,097.91 $30.93
$340.23 $81.90 $900.90 $98.79 $1,086.69 $$$92.40 $1,016.40 Cloth Tape 1”, #5146 4 rolls per bx, 12 bx per cs (J & J or approved equal) 196 Band Aids ¾” x 3” 23 cs $$$19.80 $455.40 $26.65
$612.95 $51.85 $1,192.55 $22.80 $524.40 $36.73 $844.79 $$$15.60 $358.80 #4634 150 per bx, 12 bx per cs (J & J or approved equal) 197 Triangular Bandages 18 cs $$$50.40 $907.20 $64.40
$1,159.20 $50.41 $907.38 $66.90 $1,204.20 $75.29 $1,355.22 $$$78.20 $1,407.60 #11202, Non-Sterile, 36” x 36” x 51” 12 per bx, 240 per cs (Dynarex, J & J or approved equal) 198 Adaptic
Bandages 26 bx $$$32.94 $856.44 $21.95 $570.70 $23.61 $613.86 $39.59 $1,029.34 $24.70 $642.20 $$$29.24 $760.24 #2012, 3” x 3” 50 per bx (J & J or approved equal) 199 Combination Pads
14 cs $$$45.05 $630.70 $47.24 $661.36 $42.57 $595.98 $39.90 $558.60 $37.27 $521.78 $$$45.20 $632.80 #23145, 5” x 9” 25 per bx, 16 bx per cs 400 per cs (J & J or approved equal) 200 2”
Sterile Kling 18 cs $$$18.80 $338.40 $138.37 $2,490.66 $9.85 $177.30 $19.15 $344.70 $18.18 $327.24 $$$19.76 $355.68 #6922 12 per bx, 8 bx per cs (J & J or approved equal) 201 Trauma
Dressing 17 cs $$$50.00 $850.00 $52.50 $892.50 $114.51 $1,946.67 $41.50 $705.50 $45.44 $772.48 $$$47.00 $799.00 #11684, 10” x 30” 50 per cs (Moore Medical or approved equal) 202 Sterile
4” Kling 22 cs $$$17.58 $386.76 $138.37 $3,044.14 $5.65 $124.30 $20.00 $440.00 $17.94 $394.68 $$$24.88 $547.36 #6924 12 per bx, 6 bx per cs (J & J or approved equal) 203 Sterile 4” x
4” 12-Ply #3342 8 cs $$$40.56 $324.48 $48.72 $389.76 $39.37 $314.96 $43.90 $351.20 $29.80 $238.40 $$$36.48 $291.84 #3342, 25 envelopes of 2 bx 24 bx per cs, 1,200 sponges per cs (Dynarex,
J & J or approved equal) TabSheet02.03.2012 13
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 204 Asherman Chest Seal 3 bx $$$315.50 $946.50 $97.75 $293.25 $94.01 $282.03 $90.00 $270.00 $95.52 $286.56 $$$91.20
$273.60 10 per bx Rusch NO SUBSTITUTES 205 Coban Self-Adherent Wrap 2” 20 bx $$$59.04 $1,180.80 $55.44 $1,108.80 $30.34 $606.80 $27.00 $540.00 $23.82 $476.40 $$$23.68 $473.60 #1582,
36 per bx (3M or approved equal) 206 Economy Cold pks 6” x 8” 90 cs $$$5.96 $536.40 $6.00 $540.00 $6.41 $576.90 $11.50 $1,035.00 $12.00 $1,080.00 $$$9.95 $895.50 #21124, 24 per cs (GAM
or approved equal) 207 Sterile Burn Sheet 60” x 90” 11 cs $$$36.96 $406.56 $34.20 $376.20 $37.45 $411.95 $38.16 $419.76 $31.81 $349.91 $$$21.72 $238.92 #7010, 12 per cs (GAM or approved
equal) 208 O.B. Kit, Soft Pack 120 ea $$$5.62 $674.40 $6.15 $738.00 $6.24 $748.80 $4.39 $526.80 $12.11 $1,453.20 $$$3.89 $466.80 #2030 (EMP or approved equal) 209 Duplicate Item -See
#208 120 ea $$$5.62 $674.40 $$$6.24 $748.80 $4.39 $526.80 $12.11 $1,453.20 $$$3.89 $466.80 (EMP or approved equal) 210 Safety Scalpel, Size 11 4 bx $$$21.10 $84.40 $4.27 $17.08 $3.62
$14.48 $7.15 $28.60 $6.88 $27.52 $$$4.19 $16.76 #1611, 10 per bx (Dynarex or approved equal) 211 Baby Beannie 30 ea $$$0.63 $18.90 $1.29 $38.70 $1.61 $48.30 $0.75 $22.50 $1.81 $54.30
$$$0.88 $26.40 #32-200 Knitted Polyester Stockinette (EMP or approved equal) 212 Baby Bunting 30 ea $$$2.77 $83.10 $6.65 $199.50 $3.16 $94.80 $1.89 $56.70 $4.31 $129.30 $$$2.64 $79.20
#112, Isothermal Foil Blanket Sterile (GAM or approved equal) 213 Hydrogen Peroxide 3% 58 cs $$$10.92 $633.36 $9.96 $577.68 $7.69 $446.02 $12.90 $748.20 $7.46 $432.68 $$$0.89 $51.62
#98001 16 oz. btl, 12 btl per cs (Medline or approved equal ) 214 Sponges, 4” x 4” 22 cs $$$51.00 $1,122.00 $66.50 $1,463.00 $56.81 $1,249.82 $47.19 $1,038.18 $45.85 $1,008.70 $$$51.40
$1,130.80 Non-Sterile 8-Ply #1792 200 per pkg., 4,000 sponges per cs (Kendall or approved equal) 215 Sponges, 4” x 4” 18 cs $$$40.56 $730.08 $48.72 $876.96 $53.29 $959.22 $43.90 $790.20
$29.80 $536.40 $$$36.48 $656.64 Sterile 12-Ply #3342, 25 envelopes of 2 bx 24 bx per cs 1,200 sponges per cs (Dynarex, J & J or approved equal) 216 Sudecon Irritant Spray 100 pr $$$1.60
$160.00 $1.99 $199.00 $1.80 $180.00 $2.00 $200.00 $1.91 $191.00 $$$$Decontamination Wipes Sudecon Towelettes, #FL911 (Fox Labs or approved equal ) TabSheet02.03.2012 14
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 217 Normal Saline 16 cs $$$12.48 $199.68 $28.33 $453.28 $20.05 $320.80 $34.19 $547.04 $18.88 $302.08 $$$$1,000 mL
Plastic btl #2F7114, 12 per cs (Baxter or approved equal) 218 Nail Polish Remover Pads 4 bx $$$2.86 $11.44 $3.59 $14.36 $2.96 $11.84 $3.19 $12.76 $3.88 $15.52 $$$3.09 $12.36 #71200,
100 per bx (PDI or approved equal) GROUP 6 GRAND TOTAL $$14,044.52 $18,613.47 $13,655.95 $13,476.58 $14,770.57 $$11,697.92 (Items 194 -218) PERCENTAGE DISCOUNT OFF LIST PRICE FOR ITEMS
SIMILAR TO, BUT NOT LISTED IN THIS GROUP: 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% GROUP 7 -INFECTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES: 219 Gloves, Nitrile Micro Flex 6 cs $$$95.10 $570.60 $66.50 $399.00
$89.71 $538.26 $$$92.65 $555.90 $75.00 $$109.56 $657.36 Supreno – Size Small #SU690S $7.50perbx 10 bx per cs -Micro Flex NO SUBSTITUTE 220 Gloves, Nitrile Micro Flex 11 cs $$$95.10 $1,046.10
$66.50 $731.50 $89.71 $986.81 $$$92.65 $1,019.15 $75.00 $$109.56 $1,205.16 Supreno – Size Medium #SU690M $7.50perbx 10 bx per cs -Micro Flex NO SUBSTITUTE 221 Gloves, Nitrile Micro Flex
13 cs $$$95.10 $1,236.30 $66.50 $864.50 $89.71 $1,166.23 $$$92.65 $1,204.45 $75.00 $$109.56 $1,424.28 Supreno – Size Large #SU690L $7.50perbx 10 bx per cs (MICRO FLEX-No Substitute)
222 Gloves, Nitrile Micro Flex 17 cs $$$95.10 $1,616.70 $66.50 $1,130.50 $89.71 $1,525.07 $$$92.65 $1,575.05 $75.00 $$109.56 $1,862.52 Supreno – Size Extra Large #SU690XL $7.50perbx
10 bx per cs -Micro Flex NO SUBSTITUTE 223 Personal Antimicrobial Wipe 53 bx $$$4.12 $218.36 $3.75 $198.75 $3.38 $179.14 $$$3.77 $199.81 $$$3.94 $208.82 P.A.W.S. #34400 100 ea per bx
(Safetec or approved equal) 224 Alcare Plus Hand Foam #6399 312 ea $$$9.02 $2,814.24 $1.71 $533.52 $7.17 $2,237.04 $$$7.60 $2,371.20 $$$8.97 $2,798.64 Kills micro-organisms 9 oz. (Zeneca
or approved equal) 225 Biohazard Bags #45-41 46 cs $31.74 $1,460.04 $42.50 $1,955.00 $47.05 $2,164.30 $66.10 $3,040.60 $$$72.63 $3,340.98 $$$80.84 $3,718.64 Red Disposable -250 per case
31” x 41”, 33 gallon size (MD Industries or approved equal) 226 Biohazard Bags #45-54 43 cs $25.39 $1,091.77 $137.50 $5,912.50 $45.05 $1,937.15 $51.91 $2,232.13 $$$39.70 $1,707.10 $$$54.89
$2,360.27 Red Disposable 24” x 24”, 16 gallon size 50 per bx, 5 bx per cs, 250 per cs (MD Industries or approved equal) 227 Sharp Containers 61 cs $$$101.52 $6,192.72 $128.16 $7,817.76
$96.85 $5,907.85 $$$104.09 $6,349.49 $$$3.40 $207.40 Size 1.5, Quart Red #305487 36 per cs -Becton Dickinson NO SUBSTITUTES TabSheet02.03.2012 15
City of Delray Beach Schedule of Pricing Bid No. 2012-12 Medical /Medication Supplies -Annual Contract All American Poly Bound Tree Medical Guardian Med. Products Henry Schein EMS Kentron
Health Care Midwest Medical Supply PH&S Products LLC QuadMed, Inc. ITEM # DESCRIPTION EST/Unit UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice
Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension UnitPrice Estension 228 Sharp Containers 50 cs $$$126.00 $6,300.00 $156.96 $7,848.00 $117.85 $5,892.50 $$$126.43 $6,321.50 $$$6.68 $334.00
Size 8, Quart Red w/clear top #305460 24 per cs -Becton Dickinson NO SUBSTITUTES 229 Technol PFR95 4 bx $$$26.25 $105.00 $28.89 $115.56 $148.21 $592.84 $$$25.87 $103.48 $$$24.49 $97.96
Tuberculosis Masks Size Small, #46827 35 per bx -Kimberly Clark NO SUBSTITUTES 230 Technol PFR95 4 bx $$$26.25 $105.00 $28.89 $115.56 $148.21 $592.84 $$$25.87 $103.48 $$$25.72 $102.88
Tuberculosis Masks Size Medium, #46727 35 per bx -Kimberly Clark NO SUBSTITUTES 231 Molded Surgical Mask #22030 24 bx $$$4.41 $105.84 $4.48 $107.52 $6.47 $155.28 $$$4.36 $104.64 $$$3.27
$78.48 Blue, One Size Fits All 50 per bx (Dynarex or approved equal) 232 Sleeves #3712 10 cs $$$20.00 $200.00 $25.38 $253.80 $83.55 $835.50 $$$62.34 $623.40 $$$55.59 $555.90 18” White
w/Elastic at both ends 200 per cs (Posi-Wear or approved equal) 233 Protective Eyewear 200 ea $$$2.47 $494.00 $2.05 $410.00 $2.17 $434.00 $$$3.55 $710.00 $$$4.63 $926.00 High Impact
Protection Optically Correct Lens Wrap Arounds, #SA5190 (MDS Matrx or approved equal) 234 Convenience Bags 3 cs $$$208.80 $626.40 $96.00 $288.00 $283.21 $849.63 $$$254.77 $764.31 $$$0.91
$2.73 One Size, one-way Plastic (Vomit Bags), #GKR7000 12 per package, 240 per cs (GKR or approved equal) 235 Chux Absorbent Compact 6 cs $$$0.09 $0.54 $0.19 $1.14 $35.49 $212.94 $$$23.52
$141.12 $$$0.17 $1.02 Underpads, 12” x 17” -Conmed each NO SUBSTITUTES 236 Disposable Glasses #180S 220 ea $$$1.05 $231.00 $1.95 $429.00 $1.85 $407.00 $$$1.27 $279.40 $$$1.52 $334.40
Clear Polycarbonate Lenses #180S (ADEN BAM 180S) 237 Cavicide 24 oz. spray bottle 36 ea $$$7.67 $276.12 $8.06 $290.16 $6.26 $225.36 $$$7.30 $262.80 $$$88.00 $3,168.00 #12024 (Metrex
or approved equal) GROUP 7 GRAND TOTAL $2,551.81 $30,006.42 $25,635.72 $28,011.02 $$27,737.26 $$20,044.46 (Items 219 -237) PERCENTAGE DISCOUNT OFF LIST PRICE FOR ITEMS SIMILAR TO, BUT
NOT LISTED IN THIS GROUP: 0% 18.0% 10.0% 15.6% 0.0% 12.0% 0.0% 15.0% TabSheet02.03.2012 16
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Paul Dorling, AICP, Director of Planning and Zoning THROUGH: City Manager DATE: March 29, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 9.A. -REGULAR COMMISSION
MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 APPEAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPEARANCE BOARD ACTION: DELRAY INN, INC. ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION The action requested of the City Commission is consideration
of an appeal of the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board's (SPRAB) denial of a Class III site plan modification, and landscape plan for Delray Inn, Inc. located at 297 N.E. 6th Avenue.
The Board approved the related architectural elevations. BACKGROUND On February 22, 2012, the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board (SPRAB) denied the Class III site plan modification
and landscape plan. On March 2, 2012, SPRAB’s action was appealed by the applicant’s attorney, Jeffrey Lynne. The basis of the appeal is that the SPRAB Board denial of the site plan
and landscape plan was based upon the proposed use as a Non-Residential Licensed Service Provider as opposed to the failure to meet the technical requirements of the LDR’s. The relief
being sought is to uphold the appeal and approve the Class III site plan modification and Landscape Plan. The appeal is being processed pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(E) Appeals. REVIEW
BY OTHERS At its meeting of March 2, 2012, the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board (SPRAB) denied the Class III site plan modification on a 4 to 2 vote (first vote was 3 to 3) and
a 6 to 0 vote on the Landscape Plan. The Board followed the established quasi-judicial procedures in considering the project. Members of the public spoke in opposition citing concerns
over lack of security, the need for additional screening and concerns over compatibility of the use. Board members also discussed concerns over safety of both residents of the facility
and surrounding neighbors as well as compatibility of the use with adjacent residential uses. City staff and the applicant offered testimony, which supported the development proposal.
After deliberation SPRAB denied the Class III site plan modification and the associated landscape plan while approving the architectural elevations. RECOMMENDATION City Commission discretion.
?GGGE?E?'E"""77"""!+(!!E!*88'84+8#!*!!)!"!&#!!#J/):N#!*!)##!)!#&!*'(&!!!!*!!5'84+8(8(!!'!!!#*!!!##!*!"#!!#!*!*!!!!#!!)##!)!#&!*'(!P!##!#!#!&!''#(8"""9-()!8(3(KJDNJKN'#!!#!#*!!*"!#!#!!&"#(.%$.:0$/2%62
/%;.<<<<<<<<<<<<"9"-(E!#F!!!$!"!-+Q)!*!#!"!!#!#!"!!#!!!!#!*!#!!''#!!*#!'!*#$!#!'#!#!!!#(.%$.:0$/2%62/%;.<<<<<<<<<<<<
8"8-)!3(L(+L'/#!!:'#!"!!!!!%#*#!$&!#!"!!!'#'#!#!!!'#-!!"!%#!-!#!"!!!*#!#!!"!!!!'!#"!!#!##!!*!!!!&!!*"###!#!!#(%:0$/2%.'%$2++/%;.<<<<<<<<<<<<3(!*!#!!!"!)#!P!!!>!!!!!!&!#(K(!*#!!!#!!!"#!!#!!#!###!!#!!#
#!#!!'!*!>!#!!!&!!!!#(L(!#!!!!#!!'!*"!OOOO#!!OOOO!!'$!!&#!>/:#/:(!*!!*##!5##*'84+8'*"!OOOOO"#OOOOO!#(QOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!(G!'G*OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"!!*!%
=>?"+(!!J5N!!!"!#!!###!#"#!!!#!!W8(!8U--&#!#!!!*!!>!!#*--&*#!!#!&!!!*!*!#!#&!'#!!#!#!)!*!%U!!!W5(%#%!'!"!#&"!#!!!!!!!##W3(!&!!!!"!!!!*!*!WK(!P!!!#!!!#J#!!!#!#N!!!#WL(!!#!"!#!!*!&!!!!J#!'!!'#>&#&NW<()
"!%#!&%!"#!##!!!!!#!#!!!#!(##"!%!#!"#!#!#!&%L"!!J!!NWX(!!"!>L"!!#!!!&W7(#!P!%-"&#!"#!#%5#!!W+4(!&!!!!!#!"!#!-!!JKY(N"!!!#!W++(!#!!!!#!!#!!!!&(-!!!!##!#!*!!>!'!!*!!)!"!&#!!#'"!*!!!"!#&!&!G!!!(
=>?""+(!!J5N!!!"!##!!!###!!!!#!!(
Delicatessen .
11.COMMENTS AND INQUIRIES ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS FROM THE PUBLIC-
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A.City Manager's response to prior public comments and inquiries.
B.From the Public.
12. FIRST READINGS:
A.ORDINANCE NO. 14 -12: Consider a Future Land Use Map amendment (small -scale)
from CMR (Commerce) to TRN (Transitional), rezoning from LI (Light Industrial) to
NC (Neighborhood Commercial) and text amendment to the General Commercial
Land Use Description for 10 th & 10 th Center, located at the southeast corner of S.W.
10 th Street and S.W. 10 th Avenue. If passed, a public hearing will be held on April 17,
2012 .
13. COMMENTS AND INQUIRIES ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS:
A.City Manager
B.City Attorney
C.City Commission
March 20, 2012 City Commission Meeting; Item 9.B.
March 20, 2012 City Commission Meeting; Item 9.B.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Amy E. Alvarez, Senior Planner
Paul Dorling, AICP, Direct or of Planing and Zoning
THROUGH:City Manager
DATE:March 28, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.A. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
RIGHT -OF -WAY DEED/WAYSIDE HOUSE
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
The action requested of the City Commission is accept ance of a right-of-way deed associated with an
approved addition and site impr ovements at 328 – 378 N.E. 6 th Avenue, Wayside House.
BACKGROUND
At its meeting of February 22, 2012, the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board (SPRAB) approved a
Class III Site Plan Modification for the Wayside House, located at 328-378 NE 6 th Avenue. The
modification was for a 1,853 square foot building a ddition. One of the conditions of approval was the
recording of a right-of-way deed for the adjacent alley.
The existing right-of-way width of the alley at the rear (west) of the property measures 16’ and the
required width is 20’. Therefore, the applicant must dedicate 2’ (one-half of the 4’ additional right-of-
way). This dedication is shown on the attached exhibit.
RECOMMENDATION
By motion, accept the right-of-way deed for two fe et of alleyway right-of-way associated with 328-378
NE 6 th Avenue, Wayside House.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:CANDI N. JEFFERSON, SENIOR PLANNER
PAUL DORLING, AICP, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
THROUGH:CITY MANAGER
DATE:March 28, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.B. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
SIDEWALK EASEMENT AND SIDEWALK DEFERRAL AGREEMENTS/720 NORTH OCEAN
BOULEVARD
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
The action requested of the City Commission is accept ance of sidewalk easement and sidewalk deferral
agreements along the north side of Crestwood Drive a ssociated with construction of a new single family
residence within the North Beach Overlay District known as the Kaiser Residence located at 720 North
Ocean Boulevard.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is 0.4019 acresand is currently vacant. It lies within the North Beach Overlay
District and is located on the northwest corner of Crestwood Drive and North Ocean Boulevard at 720
North Ocean Boulevard. The property is zoned Singl e Family Residential (R-1-AAA) and the applicant
proposes to construct a new three-story si ngle family residence with a swimming pool.
The owner wishes to provide a five foot (5’) sidewa lk easement adjacent to the right-of-way along the
north side of Crestwood Drive to accommodate futu re construction of a sidewalk. No other sidewalks
currently exist on either side of Crestwood Drive. At its meeting of October 21, 2010, the Development
Services Management Group (DSMG) supported the sidewalk easement. The DSMG also supported a
sidewalk deferral to avoid immediate construction of a sidewalk along Crestwood Drive. Pursuant to
the attached agreements, the owner will provide a five feet (5’) sidewalk easement and construct the
sidewalk along Crestwood Drive at its sole cost and e xpense at a later date, after being requested to do
so by the City.
The agreements have been reviewed by the City Attorney and have been approved as to form.
RECOMMENDATION
By motion, accept the sidewalk easement and sidewalk deferral agreements for 720 N. Ocean
Boulevard.
such
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Rafael Ballestero, Deput y Director of Construction
Richard C. Hasko, P.E., Director of Environmental Services
THROUGH:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 19, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.C. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
CONTRACT CLOSEOUT (C.O. NO. 3)/FINAL)/INTERCOUNTY ENGINEERING, INC.
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This item is before the Commission to approve a Cont ract Closeout (Change Order No. 3/Final) in the
net deduct amount of ($221,470.60) and a final payment amount of $11,900.44 to Intercounty
Engineering, Inc. for completion of the Osceola Park WM Ph2 Project #2010-082.
BACKGROUND
The project generally consisted of th e installation of approxi mately 5,340 LF of 8 inch Ductile Iron Pipe
water main, connection of water services, and in stallation of fire hydrants; including clearing and
grubbing, sodded swale, asphalt trench repair, driv eway apron replacement, drainage, and maintenance
of traffic.
On October 4, 2011, Commission approved Change Or der No. 1 for a contract time extension of seven
(7) days, for additional work required for relocation of the proposed water main, installation of a reverse
tap, and repairs to the water main; for a total amount of $18,321.82; which was paid out of the contract's
Utility Allowance Line Item.
On December 13, 2011, Commission approved additional scope for the removal of 2,000 LF of 2"
water main in the amount of $16,000.00. This was re quested in lieu of abandonment in place to prevent
conflicts with potential future capital project design a nd construction activities. This was paid out of the
contract's Utility Allowance.
On February 2, 2012, Commission approved Change Order No. 2 for a contract time extension o f
fourteen (14) days to complete the work for rem oval of an additional 1,300 LF of 2" water main at
$8.00/LF for an amount of $10,400.00; to be paid out of the Contract's Utility Allowance. This is
requested in lieu of abandonment in place to preven t conflicts with potential future capital project
design and construction activities.
Change Order No. 3 includes plus and minus quant ity adjustments and liquidates the residual from
contingency allowances. All changes for the projec t are itemized on the attached Schedule “A”. The
project is complete and all closeout documentation has been received.
It is noted that the close out deduct amount returni ng to the City is substantially higher than normally
anticipated for typical capital infrastructure projects. This is the result of errors in the contract
quantities which caused them to be overstated, and under construction field adjustments for
underground utility alignments that affected the types and quantities of surface restoration.
FUNDING SOURCE
Residual funds to be liquidate d from Purchase Order #676211 to funding account 442-5178-536-65.85
(Water Sewer Renewal & Replacement Fund/ Other Improvements/Osceola Park).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of a Contract Closeout (Change Order No. 3/Final) in the net deduct amount
of ($221,470.60) and final payment amount of $11,900.44 to Intercounty Engineering, Inc. for
completion of the Osceola Park WM Ph2 Project.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Rafeal Ballestero, Deput y Director of Construction
Richard C. Hasko, P.E., Director of Environmental Services
THROUGH:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 19, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.D. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2/FOSTER MARINE CONTRACTORS, INC.
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This item is before the Commission to approve Change Order No. 2 (CO #2) for a contract time
extension of six (6) days; and approval, in the amo unt of $20,991.00, for add itional concrete sidewalk
and driveway removal and replacement, to be pa id out of the contract's Unforeseen Conditions
Allowance, for the Auburn Ave. Improv. Project #2010-040.
BACKGROUND
On October 4, 2011, Commission approved a contract award and Change Order No. 1 in the total
amount of $1,156,896.00 to Foster Marine Contractors, Inc. The project consists of Roadway and
Infrastructure Improvements on Auburn Avenue from SW 7th St. to SW 8th St.; SW 12th and SW 13th
Ave. from SW 8th St. to SW 10th St.; SW 8th St. from SW 14th Ave. to SW 12th Ave.; and, SW 10th
St. from SW 14th Ave. to SW 12th Ave. The sc ope of the project includes roadway resurfacing and
reconstruction, sidewalks, landscaping, design-build irrigation specifications, paver cross-walks,
drainage improvements, on street parking and bus shelters. In addition, new water and sewer
infrastructure on SW 12th and 13 Ave. from SW 8th St. to SW 10th St., SW 8th St. from SW 14th Ave.
to SW 12th Ave., and SW 10 th Street from SW 14th Ave. to SW 12th Ave.
On March 9, 2012 the City Manager approved the cost of $6,625.68 associated with converting twelve
(12) single water services and twelve (12) single sewer services, to double services. The amount was
paid out of the Contract's Unforeseen Conditions Allowance.
Change Order No. 2 in the total amount of $20,991.00 is for the removal of an additional 260 SY o f
concrete driveway and 315 LF of concrete sidewalk; and the installation of 310 LF of concrete sidewalk
and 2,340 SF of concrete driveway apron. This is required in order to properly match the plan
elevations of the proposed roadway adjacent to th e existing concrete driveways and represents an
undefined activity for which cost the unforeseen co nditions allowance item is intended.. Attached,
please find the cost details on Exhibit "A" to CO #2.
FUNDING SOURCE
Cost to be funded out of the Contract's Unfore seen Conditions Allowance; which has a balance o f
$33,374.32.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a contract time extension of six (6) days; and
approval in the amount of $20,991.00 for additional concrete sidewalk and driveway removal and
replacement, to be paid out of the contract's Un foreseen Conditions Allowance for the Auburn Ave.
Improv. Project.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Victor Majtenyi; Deputy Director of Public Utilities
Richard C. Hasko, P.E.; Director of Environmental Services Department
THROUGH:David Harden; City Manager
DATE:March 15, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.E. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 07 -17.2 TO MATHEWS CONSULTING, INC.
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Request approval of Service Aut horization #07-17.2 (Amendment 2 to Service Authorization 17) to
Mathews Consulting, Inc. in the amount of $33,146.00 for additional professional engineering services
in the design of Area 12A Reclaimed Water System, P/N 2011-036.
BACKGROUND
On February 1, 2011, City Commission awarded Se rvice Authorization #07-17 to Mathews Consulting
for design services relating to the Area 12A Reclaime d Water System project. The project limits include
the area on the barrier island south of Atlan tic Ave to just north of Casuarina Road.
As part of the progressive design review, cons ultant and staff conducte d value engineering and
reviewed the design with conformance to the reclaime d master plan. The review identified several items
that needed to be addressed as part of the overall project, with one item a potential cost savings. The
items are as follows: redesign of the reclaimed main along Venetian Drive from a continuous 8” main to
multiple smaller 4” main segments to save cons truction costs; perform design modifications on the
reclaimed transmission main along Atlantic Avenue du e to identified utility c onflicts; perform design
upgrades on area drainage systems to address several existing drainage issues within the project limits;
p erform design modifications to address conflicts with proposed Florida Public Utility mains; and
separate the project into two distinct smaller bid packages for enhanced control and project
management, as well as being able to reallocate fund s to other priority project s. The scope of services
under this service authorization totals $33,146. A deta iled description of each item is listed below:
During the design process, we realized that we c ould provide reclaimed services to most of the
customers along Venetian Drive through smaller pi pes using alternative construction methods. The
large piping along Venetian Drive can be eliminated in several sections since these areas can be fed
from cross streets, and the piping that is to remain ca n be downsized from an 8” diameter pipe to a 4”
diameter pipe. In addition, piping along Bay and Nassau Streets can also be downsized from 6”
diameter to 4” diameter.
Due to the numerous utility conflicts under the sout hern sidewalk area of Atlantic Avenue from
Salina Avenue to Gleason Street, the main reclai med pipe along Atlantic Avenue will need to be
relocated under the eastbound traffic lane of Atlantic Avenue.
In the year 2000, improvements along Venetian Dr ive required use of a geo-grid mat under the
roadway bed as stabilization due to the existing muck soil conditions under the roadway. The Bay
Street Stormwater Pump Station is located on the west side of Vene tian Drive. To avoid
compromising the geo-grid material, the consult refrained from designing any improvements across
Venetian Drive when designing the drainage improve ments relating to Bay Street. Thus, the original
design improvements started on the east side of Vene tian Drive. Subsequent research with the geo-
grid material manufacturer revealed that the mat can be cut and mended to re-establish the
stabilization that the mat is intended to provide. Thus, to fully realize the benefits of drainage
upgrades upstream on the system, the design will now incorporate upgrades downstream across
Venetian Drive to the Bay Street Storm Pump Station.
The residence at 1109 Nassau Street (east of Gleason Street) has experienced major flooding
conditions during heavy rain events. Scope of serv ices includes design of drainage improvement on
this street to address and alleviate the flooding condition.
Florida Public Utilities is performing upgrades and customer connections on Ingraham Avenue,
Gleason Street, and Venetian Drive. A desi gn coordination meeting revealed multiple potential
conflict areas with their proposed gas mains. In addition, the City’s proposed drainage upgrades on
Bay Street are in conflict with their existing gas line. Scope of services includes design revisions to
address these conflicts.
Staff decided to reduce the funding le vel on this project to allow re-p rioritization for other repair and
replacement projects (such as the Congress Ave fo rce main replacement). The project will now be
designed, prepared, and bid as two separate projects; Phase I, Gleason Street and associated eastern
side streets to be bid in 2012, and Phase II, Venetian Drive and associated side streets to be bid in
2013. Services include separating the initial design into two distinct bid packages.
Service Authorization #07-17 for design services re lating to the Area 12A Reclaimed Water System
project was approved in the amount of $179,963.
On September 9, 2011, Amendment #1 was approved fo r conducting additional soft-dig explorations in
the amount of $14,850.00.
Total proposed costs for additional services under Amendment #2 (Service Authorization #07-17.2) is
$33,146.00.
FUNDING SOURCE
Funding is available from account #441-5161-536-68.73, Water & Sewer Fund/Reclaimed Water, Area
12A.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Serv ice Authorization #07-17.2 to Mathews Consulting, Inc. in the
amount of $33,146.00 for professional engineering services related to the design of Area 12A
Reclaimed Water System, P/N 2011-036.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Begoña Krane, Engineer
Richard C. Hasko, P.E., Environmental Services Director
THROUGH:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 28, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.F. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
REJECTION OF ALL BIDS/DELRAY BEACH HEIGHTS SWALE PROJECT
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This item is before the Commission to reject all bids received for the Delray Beach Heights Swale
Project number 2012-060, and authori ze staff to re-bid the project.
BACKGROUND
This construction contract includes the following im provements: Construction of 6” deep roadside
swales, clearing and grubbing, grading, sod, and main tenance of traffic at several places throughout the
Delray Beach Heights Neighborhood.
On Monday March 27, 2012, the City opened bids fo r the Delray Beach Heights Neighborhood Project.
The bidders only acknowledged receipt of three (3) addendums, but four (4) addendums were issued.
Staff is requesting that Commission reject all bids received for project number 2012- 060 based on
bidders missing addendum number four (4). This ir regularity could have generated lower bids.
Addendum #4, message from the apparent low bidder and location map are attached.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the rejection of all bids receiv ed for the Delray Beach Heights Neighborhood swales
projects and authorize staff to re-bid project.
1
Hasko, Richard
To:Krejcarek, Randal
Subject:RE: RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project
From: Krane, Begona
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 10:29 AM
To: Shutt, Brian
Cc: Krejcarek, Randal
Subject: FW: RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project
Brian,
Belowisthecontractorsobjection torebiddingtheproject.Pleaseadvise.Thankyou
Begoña Krane
Engineering Department
City of Delray Beach
434 S. Swinton Ave.
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Phone #561-243-7299
Fax #561-243-7060
From: Frank Bou [mailto:FBou@charliefrymyer.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 10:25 AM
To: Krane, Begona
Cc: Luis Sanchez; Josh Marfleet; Kevin Taylor
Subject: FW: RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project
Begoña
IaminreceiptofyoucorrespondencetoLuisSanchez andherearemycommentsonAddenda#4:
Items#1and#2werediscussedinthemandatoryprebid.
Item#3–thecontractspe cifiesthatthedurationoftheprojectis 40dayssubstantialcompletionand20days afterthat.
Thebiddershouldknowthattheyareresponsibletomaintain allinstalledmaterialsuntil acceptancebythecity.
AppendixAisstatedonpage167as partofthecontractdocuments.
Item#4–Section02110Part3.02andSection02110Part 3.02ofthecontractdocume ntsdescribeproceduresfor
disposingofmaterials.
Item#5–nothingincontr actdocumentsstatethat asbuiltsarerequired.
Ifthecontractorreadthru thecontractdocumentsandwas inattendanceattheprebid,t hesequestionswouldnotbe
valid.
Inthiscase,theonlyparty sustainingdamagesismyfirm.Addendum#4shouldnotaffect anyofthebidderspricingas
allofitwasdiscussedinonewayoranother duringthebidprocess.Allbidders nowhaveaccesstoeveryonebidprice
whichgiveanunfairadvantagetothefirms thatwerenotlowbidder.Irespectf ullyrequestthatyouupholdthebid
resultsinfavorofourfirmaslow biddersandwouldliketoknow whatthenextstepsaresince thecityisholdingourbid
andbidbond.Pleaseadvise.
Sincerely
2
FrankA.Bou
Principal
Charlie Frymyer Paving
4802SW51stStreet
Davie,Florida33314
9545225680
9545229478Fax
fbou@charliefrymyer.com
www.charliefrymyer.com
From: Luis Sanchez
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:03 PM
To: Frank Bou; Josh Marfleet
Subject: FW: RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project
From: Krane, Begona [mailto:krane@mydelraybeach.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:53 PM
To: Luis Sanchez
Cc: Frank Bou; Josh Marfleet; Krejcarek, Randal
Subject: RE: RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project
Luis,
AfterItalkedtothe CityEngineerandtheCityAttorn ey,wethoughtthatitwassignifica ntenoughtoinvalidatethebid.
Attachedisaddendumnumber4.
Begoña Krane
Engineering Department
City of Delray Beach
434 S. Swinton Ave.
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Phone #561-243-7299
Fax #561-243-7060
From: Luis Sanchez [mailto:LSanchez@charliefrymyer.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:28 PM
To: Krane, Begona
Cc: Frank Bou; Josh Marfleet
Subject: RE: RFI Bid #2012-12 Delray Beach Heights Swale Project
Begoña,
Wereceivedyouremailwiththeattached notification.Wherecanweseeaddenda#4.
Wherethechangesinadd enda#4significantenoughtoinvalidatethisbid??
Pleaseadvise.
Thanks,
Luis F. Sánchez-Kinghorn
Managing Member
3
Charlie Frymyer Paving
4802SW51stStreet
Davie,Florida33314
9545225680
9545229478Fax
lsanchez@charliefrymyer.com
www.charliefrymyer.com
TEXAS
MBA
Alumni
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Linda Karch, Director of Parks and Recreation
THROUGH:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 28, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.G. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE LICENSE AGREEMENT/PREP AND SPORTS, INC.
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement between the City of Delray Beach and Prep and Sports,
Inc. to extend the term for an additional two (2) years for their use of a portion of the Soccer Complex.
BACKGROUND
On March 16, 2010 the City of Delray Beach entered into a two (2) years License Agreement with Prep
and Sports, Inc. The Agreement granted Prep and Sp orts, Inc. a license to use a portion of the Soccer
Complex to establish a year-round athletic training fa cility which prepares professional athletes through
a fitness and training program. In return for th e use of the complex, Prep and Sports, Inc. has
implemeted a sports training camp which is free for eligible children of Delray Beach.
Commission approval is requested to extend the term of the agreement for two (2) years beginning on
March 16, 2012.
RECOMMENDATION
Parks and Recreation recommends approval of Amendment No. 1 to the License Agreement.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Lula Butler, Director, Community Improvement
THROUGH:David Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 28, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.H. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
HOUSING REHABILITATION GRANT/CONTRACT AWARD
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Approval is requested for one (1) Housing Rehabili tation contract to be awarded to the lowest
responsive bidder. Funding for the project is through the Residential Construction Mitigation Program
(RCMP) and Neighborhood Service Division, Housing Rehabilitation funds.
BACKGROUND
Approval is requested for one (1) Housing Rehabili tation grant(s) to be awarded to the lowest
responsive bidder for the following projects:
318 SE 5 th Street/Cordoba Construction Co./$29,040.00. Total Rehab cost: $31,065.20
Grant awards are based on the actual cost of the reha bilitation, as determined by the lowest responsive
b idder(s), plus a 5% contingency. Total rehab cost al so includes lead inspection, lead abatement, lead
clearance, termite inspection, termite treatment, a nd recording fees. Additional cost may be incurred for
lead clearance test(s). The contingency may be used for change orders and all unused funds will remain
with the Housing Rehabilitation program. Inspection of work is done by the Department of Community
Improvement’s Building Inspection and Neighborhood Services Divisions. C ontracts are executed
b etween the building contractor and the property ow ner. The City remains the agent and Neighborhood
Services monitors all work performed by the contractor, ensuring compliance according to
specifications and program guideli nes. Pay request forms require both contractor and homeowner’s
signatures. Grant recipients have met all eligibilit y requirements as specified in the approved Policies
and Procedures. The rehabilitation activities will bring the homes to minimum code requirements by
repairing the roof, electric and plumbing systems and correcting other incipient code
violations. Detailed work write-ups and individua l case files are available for review in the
Neighborhood Services Division Office.
The Neighborhood Services Division is responsible for ensuring that the housing rehabilitation contracts
are awarded to the lowest responsive bidder as a resu lt of a formal bid process. Therefore, an in-house
policy was created to limit awards to the lowest responsive bidder as it relates to the Division’s
professional in-house estimate. This serves to dis qualify unreasonably low bids and therefore, protect
against the resulting change order requests.
FUNDING SOURCE
State Housin g Initiative Pro g ram (SHIP )118-1924-554-49.19$ 21,440.16
Residential Construction Mitigation
Program
118-1936-554-49.19$ 9,625.04
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends awarding one (1) Housing Rehabilitat ion grant to the lowest responsive bidder in the
amount of $31,065.20.
BID/QUOTE #: BID # 04-2012NS
APPLICANT: Mary Bomango
PROJECT ADDRESS: 318 SE 5th Street
DATE OF BID LETTERS: January 4, 2012
DATE OF BID OPENING: January 30, 2012
GENERAL CONTRACTORS BID AMOUNT BID BOND
Abisset Corporation 29,215.00 $
All Phase Roofing-$ Statement of no bid
All-Site Construction, Inc.-$
ARZ Builders, Inc.-$
Benchmark Custom Building of Palm Beach-$
Built Solid Construction, LLC35,010.00 $
Citywide Construction Services, Inc.-$
CJ Contracting, LLC42,049.00 $
Cordoba Construction Co. 28,724.00 $
JIJ Construction Corp.-$
KM Construction Inc.-$
MacDonald Construction Company of Palm Beach-$ Statement of no bid
Raymond Graeve and Sons Construction-$ Statement of no bid
South Florida Constructi on Services, Inc.34,475.00 $
Sunband Builders Construction Inc.-$
In-House Estimate:26,379.25 $
RECOMMENDED CONTRACTOR: Cordoba Construction Co.
BID/CONTRACT AMOUNT :29,040.00 $
5% Contingency1,452.00 $
30,492.00 $
Lead Inspection450.00
Lead Clearance85.00
Termite InspectionN/A
Termite TreatmentN/A
Recording Fees38.20
GRANT CONTRACT AMOUNT31,065.20
FUNDING SOURCE:
Account #SHIP $21,440.16118-1924-554-49.19
RCMP $9,625.04118-1936-554-49.19
COMMENTS:Recommend awarding bid to lowest responsive contractor, Cordoba Construction Company
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES DIVISION
HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM
BID INFORMATION SHEET
BI
D
/
Q
U
O
T
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
BI
D
#
0
4
-
2
0
1
2
N
S
OW
N
E
R
:
Ma
r
y
B
o
m
a
n
g
o
AD
D
R
E
S
S
:
31
8
S
E
5
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
BI
D
A
D
V
E
R
T
I
S
E
M
E
N
T
D
A
T
E
:
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
4
,
2
0
1
2
BI
D
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
D
A
T
E
:
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
3
0
,
2
0
1
2
In-
H
o
u
s
e
Abi
s
s
e
t
Co
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
All
P
h
a
s
e
R
o
o
f
i
n
g
Bui
l
t
S
o
l
i
d
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
L
L
C
CJ
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
,
LL
C
.
Co
r
d
o
b
a
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Co
m
p
a
n
y
,
I
n
c
.
So
u
t
h
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ser
v
i
c
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
1
Gl
o
b
i
a
l
E
n
c
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
2,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
5
8
0
.
0
0
$
2
Ra
k
e
S
o
i
l
&
P
l
a
c
e
M
u
l
c
h
50
0
.
0
0
$
6
5
0
.
0
0
$
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
3
Re
m
o
v
e
I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
D
o
o
r
s
70
0
.
0
0
$
3
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
6
5
.
0
0
$
9
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
3
0
.
0
0
$
4
Re
m
o
v
e
W
o
o
d
W
i
n
d
o
w
s
2,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$
5
Fl
a
t
D
e
c
k
1,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
4
5
0
.
0
0
$
6
In
s
t
a
l
l
N
e
w
R
o
o
f
2,
5
6
8
.
0
0
$
3
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
2
4
.
9
6
$
2
,
6
8
0
.
0
0
$
6a
In
s
t
a
l
l
N
e
w
R
o
o
f
1,
1
7
5
.
0
4
$
RC
M
P
1
,
1
7
5
.
0
4
$
7
Re
p
l
a
c
e
S
o
f
f
i
t
A
n
d
F
a
s
c
i
a
32
3
.
0
5
$
3
1
5
.
0
0
$
4
7
5
.
0
0
$
4
2
0
.
0
0
$
4
.
0
0
$
5
3
0
.
0
0
$
8
Ho
u
s
e
N
u
m
b
e
r
s
50
.
0
0
$
2
5
.
0
0
$
9
5
.
0
0
$
1
0
.
0
0
$
2
0
.
0
0
$
7
5
.
0
0
$
9
Hu
r
r
i
c
a
n
e
S
h
u
t
t
e
r
s
78
4
.
0
0
$
6
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
5
0
.
0
0
$
8
7
0
.
0
0
$
RC
M
P
6
5
0
.
0
0
$
10
In
s
t
a
l
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
W
i
n
d
o
w
s
4,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
5
6
0
.
0
0
$
RC
M
P
7
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
11
Pa
i
n
t
H
o
u
s
e
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
2,
0
3
0
.
9
5
$
1
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
9
9
9
.
0
0
$
1
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
3
8
0
.
0
0
$
TO
T
A
L
9
,
6
2
5
.
0
4
$
12
In
s
t
a
l
l
I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
D
o
o
r
16
0
.
0
0
$
2
2
5
.
0
0
$
2
3
5
.
0
0
$
1
2
0
.
0
0
$
2
8
0
.
0
0
$
2
5
0
.
0
0
$
13
Pa
i
n
t
i
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
1,
5
7
2
.
5
0
$
1
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
6
2
5
.
0
0
$
14
Re
p
a
i
r
D
r
y
w
a
l
l
65
0
.
7
5
$
3
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
6
5
.
0
0
$
1
5
0
.
0
0
$
5
5
0
.
0
0
$
4
7
0
.
0
0
$
15
Re
p
a
i
r
H
a
r
d
w
o
o
d
F
l
o
o
r
i
n
g
20
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
0
.
0
0
$
3
6
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
8
0
.
0
0
$
3
2
5
.
0
0
$
16
In
s
t
a
l
l
T
o
i
l
e
t
35
0
.
0
0
$
3
7
5
.
0
0
$
3
7
5
.
0
0
$
3
5
0
.
0
0
$
4
2
0
.
0
0
$
3
5
0
.
0
0
$
17
In
s
t
a
l
l
V
a
i
n
t
y
/
W
S
i
n
k
72
5
.
0
0
$
6
2
5
.
0
0
$
4
6
5
.
0
0
$
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
8
0
.
0
0
$
6
3
5
.
0
0
$
18
Ta
n
k
l
e
s
s
W
a
t
e
r
H
e
a
t
e
r
1,
7
1
5
.
0
0
$
5
7
5
.
0
0
$
8
9
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
9
6
0
.
0
0
$
19
Sm
o
k
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
s
48
0
.
0
0
$
5
2
5
.
0
0
$
7
9
5
.
0
0
$
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
7
5
.
0
0
$
20
In
s
t
a
l
l
1
5
0
A
m
p
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
1,
2
4
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
0
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$
21
In
s
t
a
l
l
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
L
i
g
h
t
F
i
x
t
u
r
e
23
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
2
5
.
0
0
$
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
4
0
.
0
0
$
4
6
0
.
0
0
$
22
Re
p
a
i
r
E
l
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
1,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
0
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
0
6
5
.
0
0
$
1
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
1
0
.
0
0
$
1,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
T
O
T
A
L
26
,
3
7
9
.
2
5
$
2
9
,
2
1
5
.
0
0
$
-
$
3
5
,
0
1
0
.
0
0
$
4
2
,
0
4
9
.
0
0
$
2
8
,
7
2
4
.
0
0
$
3
4
,
4
7
5
.
0
0
$
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
ad
d
e
d
l
i
n
e
it
e
m
f
o
r
tr
a
s
h
b
i
n
St
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
n
o
b
i
d
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:REBECCA S. O'CONNOR, TREASURER
DAVID A. BOYD, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
THROUGH:DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
DATE:March 27, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.I. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
RESOLUTION NO. 20 -12/INVESTMENT POLICY
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Approve Resolution No. 20-12 to implement an i nvestment policy establishing objectives and
p arameters for the management of public funds (excluding pension funds , trust funds and funds related
to debt issuance) of the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
BACKGROUND
Public Financial Asset Management (PFM), our investment advisors, conducted a review of our current
policy and provided an updated version. This polic y is designed to ensure the prudent management o f
p ublic funds and provide the availability of operating and capital f unds when needed and an investment
return competitive with comparable f unds and financial market indices.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend Commission approval of Resolution No. 20-12.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager
THROUGH:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 29, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.J. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEET ING OF APRIL 3, 2012
SPECIAL EVENT REQUEST / 14TH ANNUAL CINCO DE MAYO FESTIVAL
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
City Commission is requested to approve a Special Event Permit for the 14 th Annual Cinco de Mayo
Festival to be held on Saturday, May 5, 2012 from 2:00 p.m. – 10:00 p.m., on the grounds of Old
School Square and in the Old School Square Park an d to authorize staff support for traffic control and
security, trash removal and signage preparation and installation. The event sponsor is also requesting
use of the Old School Square parking garage for vendor s and staff, and a City generator. Site set up is
to begin at 7:00 a.m.
BACKGROUND
Attached are a special event permit, site plan, bud get, economic calculator received from Ms. Connie
Hoke, Event Coordinator for the Festival. Cinco de Ma yo celebrates the date Mexican soldiers defeated
the French at Puebla Mexico. This celebration is a party that represents freedom and liberty. The
committee is composed of Hispanic residents of our City.
The event will be held on the grounds of Old School Square and Old School Square Park. The event
committee will be responsible for event management , liability insurance, vendor approval, site set up
and fencing. Although not requested, a Fire Department inspection will be needed as well as an onsite
service unit. The estimated overtime costs are $4,715, $250 for signage and $35 trash boxes for a total
of $5,000. Per event policies and procedures, the estima ted cost to be paid for City services is $3,820.
Since alcoholic beverages will be so ld and they will be charging admi ssion, the site will be secured to
contain alcohol consumption on site. We also would re quire that all alcoholic beverages be served in
paper or plastic cups, no bottles.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the special event perm it, staff support for traffic control and security,
clean up, EMS assistance and Fire inspection, signage preparation and installation and a City
generator. Approval is contingent on the receipt of a Certification of Liabil ity Insurance and Liquor
Liability Insurance fourteen (14) days prior to the event.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Jasmin Allen, Planner
Paul Dorling, AICP, Direct or of Planning and Zoning
THROUGH:City Manager
DATE:March 29, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.K. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
REVIEW OF APPEALABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT BOARD ACTIONS
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
The action requested of the City Commission is revi ew of appealable actions which were taken by
various Boards during the period of March 19, 2012 through March 30, 2012.
BACKGROUND
This is the method of informing the City Commi ssion of the land use actions, taken by designated
Boards, which may be appealed to the City Commissi on. After this meeting, the appeal period shall
expire (unless the 10 day appeal period has not oc curred). Section 2.4.7(E), Appeals, of the LDRs
applies. In summary, it provides that the City Commission hears appeals of actions taken by an
approving Board. It also provides that the C ity Commission may file an appeal. To do so:
· The item must be raised by a Commission member.
· By motion, an action must be taken to place the item on the next meeting of the Commission as
an appealed item.
REVIEW BY OTHERS
Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of March 19, 2012
No appealable items were considered by the Planning and Zoning Board. The following items which
were considered by the Board will be forwarded to the City Commission for action:
A. Recommended approval (6 to 1, Gerry Francios a dissenting), of a City-initiated amendment to the
Land Development Regulations (LDR), by amending Ar ticle 7.9, “Docks, Dolphins, Finger Piers, and
Boat Lifts”, by amending Section 7.9.5, “Standards fo r Approval”; to clarify cu rrent language regarding
docks.
B. Recommended approval with conditions (7 to 0), of a conditional use request for Delray Gas
Station (formerly known as Valero Gas Station) to a llow the re-establishment of the gasoline station
with attendant food sales, at 14111 South Military Tr ail (west side of South Military Trail north o f
Conklin Drive).
C. Recommended approval (7 to 0), of a Futu re Land Use Map amendment (small-scale) from CMR
(Commerce) to TRN (Transitional), rezoning fr om LI (Light Industrial) to NC (Neighborhood
Commercial), and text amendment to the Transitional Land Use Description for 10 th & 10 th Center,
located at the southeast corner of SW 10 th Street and SW 10 th Avenue.
D. Recommended approval (7 to 0), of an amen dment to the Wallace Drive Redevelopment Plan to
allow neighborhood commercial re tail and service uses as a principal use at 10 th and 10 th Center
(southeast corner of SW 10 th Street and SW 10 th Avenue).
E. Recommended approval (7 to 0), of th e Annexation, Future Land Use Map (small-scale)
amendment from County MR-5 (Medium Residential 5 units per acre) to MD (Medium Density
Residential 5-12 du/ac) and establishm ent of initial zoning of A (Agricultural) for a 3.13 acre parcel
located at 13038 Barwick Road, (southeast corner of Barwick Road and LWDD L-30 Canal).
Site Plan Review and Appearance Board Meeting of March 28, 2012
1. Tabled (4 to 0, Shannon Dawson, Scott Porten and Nick Sadowsky absent), an amendment to the
b lanket sign program for Delray Beach Shopping Center, located 1310 North Federal Highway, to
allow Advance Auto Parts to use its corporate colors for a propos ed flat wall sign and tenant panel.
2. Approved with conditions (3 to 1, Alice Fi nst dissenting), a Class I site plan modification request
associated with the installation of awnings for The Palms , an existing multi-family building, located at
119 NE 7 th Avenue.
3. Approved with conditions (3 to 1, Alice Fi nst dissenting), a Class I site plan modification request
associated with the installation of an awning for V & R Design located at 400 East Atlantic Avenue.
Historic Preservation Board Meeting of March 21, 2012
4. Approved (6 to 0, Annette Smith stepped down), a request for a Cer tificate of Appropriateness
associated with a request for a color change for 20 West Atlantic Avenue , an existing commercial
development within the Old School Square Historic District.
5. Approved with conditions (7 to 0), a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition
of a non-contributing structure and construc tion of a new single family residence at 316 Martin Luther
King Jr. Drive within the West Settlers Historic District.
RECOMMENDATION
By motion, receive and file this report.
Attachment: Location Map
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:David Boyd, Finance Director
Patsy Nadal, Purchasing Manager
THROUGH:David Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 21, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 8.L.1 -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
BID AWARD/MULTIPLE VENDORS/MEDICAL AND DRUG SUPPLIES
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
City Commission is requested to make multiple awar ds to bidders as stated below for the purchase o f
medical/drug supplies for the City of Delray Fire Operation, Ocean Rescue and Highland Beach at an
estimated cost of $126,000, for the balance of FY 11/12. Medications and medical supplies will be
ordered “as needed”.
BACKGROUND
The City of Delray Beach is the lead entity for this joint bid with the City of Boynton Beach. Bids were
received on January 31, 2012 from eight (8) vendors, all in accordance with City purchasing policies.
Criteria used for determining recommendation: Bound Tree Medical and Henry Schein are sole
b idders for Group 3 Emergency Medications. With the nationwide critical shortage of emergency
medications, two source suppliers are a minimum re quirement to maintain compliance with chapter 401
of the Florida Statutes, and 64J of the Florida Administrative Code for ALS Providers. Midwest
Medical Supply and Guardian Medical Products offer competitive to lowest pricing in all other groups
except for group 3.
Ketron Health Care and QuadMed Inc. were low bi dders for some items. Staff does not recommend
award to QuadMed Inc. due to past issues with deliveries. Also, staff does not recommend award to
Ketron Health due to mixed reviews from references.
The bids were reviewed by Steve Anderson, EMT-P, Division Chief for the Fire Department and he
recommends award to various vendors for the City of Delray Beach per attached email dated March 19,
2012 as follows:
Bound Tree Medical, LLC
Guardian Medical Products
Henry Schein, Inc.
Midwest Medical Supply Co., LLC
Due to the way medical supplies are ordered (many times in large shipments with multiple items
included), staff recommends author ization to purchase any of the items on the bid list from the four
vendors listed above for multiple item orders, re gardless of whether a vendor is low bidder on one
p articular item. For single item orders, staff will purchase from whichever of the four vendors listed
above is the low bidder for that particular it em providing the item is immediately available.
FUNDING SOURCE
001-2315-526-52.20
001-2315-526-52.27
001-2313-522-52.20
001-2313-522-52.27
001-4123-572-52.20
001-4123-572-52.27
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends award to Bound Tree Medical, LLC, Guardian Medical Products, Henry Schein, Inc.,
and Midwest Medical Supply Co., LLC as outline above and highlighted on the attached Tabulation o f
Bids for an estimated cost of $126,000.
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
GR
O
U
P
1
-
A
I
R
W
A
Y
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
Be
r
m
a
n
O
r
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
s
(
1
-
8
)
1
Or
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
1
1
0
m
m
2
9
b
x
$
$
7.
0
0
$
20
3
.
0
0
$
6.
0
0
$
17
4
.
0
0
$
7.
0
1
$
20
3
.
2
9
$
6.
9
5
$
20
1
.
5
5
$
7.
1
9
$
20
8
.
5
1
$
$
$
10
.
0
0
$
29
0
.
0
0
$
#1
1
4
7
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
2
Or
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
1
0
0
m
m
2
9
b
x
$
$
7.
0
0
$
20
3
.
0
0
$
6.
0
0
$
17
4
.
0
0
$
12
.
0
1
$
34
8
.
2
9
$
6.
9
5
$
20
1
.
5
5
$
7.
1
9
$
20
8
.
5
1
$
$
$
10
.
0
0
$
29
0
.
0
0
$
#1
1
4
8
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
3
Or
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
9
0
m
m
2
9
b
x
$
$
7.
0
0
$
20
3
.
0
0
$
6.
0
0
$
17
4
.
0
0
$
12
.
0
1
$
34
8
.
2
9
$
6.
9
5
$
20
1
.
5
5
$
7.
1
9
$
20
8
.
5
1
$
$
$
10
.
0
0
$
29
0
.
0
0
$
#1
1
4
9
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
4
Or
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
8
0
m
m
2
8
b
x
$
$
7.
0
0
$
19
6
.
0
0
$
6.
0
0
$
16
8
.
0
0
$
12
.
0
1
$
33
6
.
2
8
$
6.
9
5
$
19
4
.
6
0
$
7.
1
9
$
20
1
.
3
2
$
$
$
10
.
0
0
$
28
0
.
0
0
$
#1
1
5
0
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
5
Or
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
7
0
m
m
2
7
b
x
$
$
7.
0
0
$
18
9
.
0
0
$
6.
0
0
$
16
2
.
0
0
$
12
.
5
1
$
33
7
.
7
7
$
6.
9
5
$
18
7
.
6
5
$
7.
1
9
$
19
4
.
1
3
$
$
$
10
.
0
0
$
27
0
.
0
0
$
#1
2
1
8
7
0
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
6
Or
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
6
0
m
m
2
7
b
x
$
$
7.
0
0
$
18
9
.
0
0
$
6.
0
0
$
16
2
.
0
0
$
12
.
5
1
$
33
7
.
7
7
$
6.
9
5
$
18
7
.
6
5
$
7.
1
9
$
19
4
.
1
3
$
$
$
10
.
0
0
$
27
0
.
0
0
$
#1
1
5
1
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
7
Or
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
5
0
m
m
2
7
b
x
$
$
7.
0
0
$
18
9
.
0
0
$
6.
0
0
$
16
2
.
0
0
$
12
.
0
1
$
32
4
.
2
7
$
6.
9
5
$
18
7
.
6
5
$
7.
1
9
$
19
4
.
1
3
$
$
$
10
.
0
0
$
27
0
.
0
0
$
#1
2
1
8
5
0
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
8
Or
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
4
0
m
m
2
7
b
x
$
$
7.
0
0
$
18
9
.
0
0
$
6.
0
0
$
16
2
.
0
0
$
12
.
5
1
$
33
7
.
7
7
$
6.
9
5
$
18
7
.
6
5
$
7.
1
9
$
19
4
.
1
3
$
$
$
10
.
0
0
$
27
0
.
0
0
$
#1
1
5
2
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
Ru
s
c
h
U
l
t
r
a
R
o
b
e
r
t
a
z
z
i
N
a
s
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
s
(
9
-
1
7
)
9
Na
s
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
2
0
F
r
2
8
b
x
$
$
17
.
9
0
$
50
1
.
2
0
$
14
.
4
0
$
40
3
.
2
0
$
17
.
4
1
$
48
7
.
4
8
$
14
.
5
0
$
40
6
.
0
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
41
1
.
6
0
$
$
$
19
.
7
4
$
55
2
.
7
2
$
#5
0
7
6
2
0
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
10
Na
s
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
2
2
F
r
2
8
b
x
$
$
17
.
9
0
$
50
1
.
2
0
$
14
.
4
0
$
40
3
.
2
0
$
17
.
4
1
$
48
7
.
4
8
$
14
.
5
0
$
40
6
.
0
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
41
1
.
6
0
$
$
$
19
.
7
4
$
55
2
.
7
2
$
#5
0
7
6
2
2
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
11
Na
s
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
2
4
F
r
2
8
b
x
$
$
17
.
9
0
$
50
1
.
2
0
$
14
.
4
0
$
40
3
.
2
0
$
17
.
4
1
$
48
7
.
4
8
$
14
.
5
0
$
40
6
.
0
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
41
1
.
6
0
$
$
$
19
.
7
4
$
55
2
.
7
2
$
#5
0
7
6
2
4
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
12
Na
s
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
2
6
F
r
2
8
b
x
$
$
17
.
9
0
$
50
1
.
2
0
$
14
.
4
0
$
40
3
.
2
0
$
17
.
4
1
$
48
7
.
4
8
$
14
.
5
0
$
40
6
.
0
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
41
1
.
6
0
$
$
$
19
.
7
4
$
55
2
.
7
2
$
#5
0
7
6
2
6
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
13
Na
s
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
2
8
F
r
2
9
b
x
$
$
17
.
9
0
$
51
9
.
1
0
$
14
.
4
0
$
41
7
.
6
0
$
17
.
4
1
$
50
4
.
8
9
$
14
.
5
0
$
42
0
.
5
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
42
6
.
3
0
$
$
$
19
.
7
4
$
57
2
.
4
6
$
#5
0
7
6
2
8
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
14
Na
s
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
3
0
F
r
2
9
b
x
$
$
17
.
9
0
$
51
9
.
1
0
$
14
.
4
0
$
41
7
.
6
0
$
17
.
4
1
$
50
4
.
8
9
$
14
.
5
0
$
42
0
.
5
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
42
6
.
3
0
$
$
$
19
.
7
4
$
57
2
.
4
6
$
#5
0
7
6
3
0
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
15
Na
s
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
3
2
F
r
1
9
b
x
$
$
17
.
9
0
$
34
0
.
1
0
$
14
.
4
0
$
27
3
.
6
0
$
17
.
4
1
$
33
0
.
7
9
$
14
.
5
0
$
27
5
.
5
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
27
9
.
3
0
$
$
$
19
.
7
4
$
37
5
.
0
6
$
#5
0
7
6
3
2
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
16
Na
s
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
3
4
F
r
2
9
b
x
$
$
17
.
9
0
$
51
9
.
1
0
$
14
.
4
0
$
41
7
.
6
0
$
17
.
4
1
$
50
4
.
8
9
$
14
.
5
0
$
42
0
.
5
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
42
6
.
3
0
$
$
$
19
.
7
4
$
57
2
.
4
6
$
#5
0
7
6
3
4
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
17
Na
s
a
l
A
i
r
w
a
y
3
6
F
r
2
9
b
x
$
$
17
.
9
0
$
51
9
.
1
0
$
14
.
4
0
$
41
7
.
6
0
$
17
.
4
1
$
50
4
.
8
9
$
14
.
5
0
$
42
0
.
5
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
$
$
19
.
7
4
$
57
2
.
4
6
$
#5
0
7
6
3
6
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
Ru
s
c
h
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
s
w
i
t
h
P
r
e
-
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
d
S
t
y
l
e
t
t
e
-
L
a
t
e
x
F
r
e
e
(
1
8
-
3
0
)
18
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
2
.
5
m
m
2
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
31
.
8
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
29
.
7
8
$
36
.
1
1
$
72
.
2
2
$
14
.
9
0
$
29
.
8
0
$
31
.
8
0
$
42
6
.
3
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
77
.
7
4
$
#5
0
6
5
2
5
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
19
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
3
.
0
m
m
2
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
31
.
8
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
29
.
7
8
$
36
.
1
1
$
72
.
2
2
$
14
.
9
0
$
29
.
8
0
$
14
.
3
5
$
28
.
7
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
77
.
7
4
$
#5
0
6
5
3
0
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
20
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
3
.
5
m
m
2
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
31
.
8
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
29
.
7
8
$
36
.
1
1
$
72
.
2
2
$
14
.
9
0
$
29
.
8
0
$
14
.
3
5
$
28
.
7
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
77
.
7
4
$
#5
0
6
5
3
5
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
21
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
4
.
0
m
m
2
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
31
.
8
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
29
.
7
8
$
36
.
1
1
$
72
.
2
2
$
14
.
9
0
$
29
.
8
0
$
14
.
3
5
$
28
.
7
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
77
.
7
4
$
#5
0
6
5
4
0
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
22
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
4
.
5
m
m
2
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
31
.
8
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
29
.
7
8
$
36
.
1
1
$
72
.
2
2
$
14
.
9
0
$
29
.
8
0
$
14
.
3
5
$
28
.
7
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
77
.
7
4
$
#5
0
6
5
4
5
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
1
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
23
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
5
.
0
m
m
2
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
31
.
8
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
29
.
7
8
$
36
.
1
1
$
72
.
2
2
$
14
.
9
0
$
29
.
8
0
$
14
.
3
5
$
28
.
7
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
77
.
7
4
$
#5
0
6
5
5
0
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
24
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
5
.
5
m
m
2
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
31
.
8
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
29
.
7
8
$
34
.
8
1
$
69
.
6
2
$
14
.
9
0
$
29
.
8
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
29
.
4
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
77
.
7
4
$
#5
0
6
5
5
5
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
25
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
6
.
0
m
m
5
4
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
85
8
.
6
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
80
4
.
0
6
$
39
.
8
1
$
2,
1
4
9
.
7
4
$
16
.
5
0
$
89
1
.
0
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
79
3
.
8
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
2,
0
9
8
.
9
8
$
#5
0
6
5
6
0
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
26
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
6
.
5
m
m
5
4
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
85
8
.
6
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
80
4
.
0
6
$
39
.
8
1
$
2,
1
4
9
.
7
4
$
16
.
5
0
$
89
1
.
0
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
79
3
.
8
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
2,
0
9
8
.
9
8
$
#5
0
6
5
6
5
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
27
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
7
.
0
m
m
5
6
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
89
0
.
4
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
83
3
.
8
4
$
39
.
8
1
$
2,
2
2
9
.
3
6
$
16
.
5
0
$
92
4
.
0
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
82
3
.
2
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
2,
1
7
6
.
7
2
$
#5
0
6
5
7
0
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
28
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
7
.
5
m
m
5
6
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
89
0
.
4
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
83
3
.
8
4
$
39
.
8
1
$
2,
2
2
9
.
3
6
$
16
.
5
0
$
92
4
.
0
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
82
3
.
2
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
2,
1
7
6
.
7
2
$
#5
0
6
5
7
5
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
29
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
8
.
0
m
m
5
7
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
90
6
.
3
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
84
8
.
7
3
$
39
.
8
1
$
2,
2
6
9
.
1
7
$
16
.
5
0
$
94
0
.
5
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
83
7
.
9
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
2,
2
1
5
.
5
9
$
#5
0
6
5
8
0
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
30
Un
c
u
f
f
e
d
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
9
.
0
m
m
5
3
b
x
$
$
15
.
9
0
$
84
2
.
7
0
$
14
.
8
9
$
78
9
.
1
7
$
39
.
8
1
$
2,
1
0
9
.
9
3
$
16
.
5
0
$
87
4
.
5
0
$
14
.
7
0
$
77
9
.
1
0
$
$
$
38
.
8
7
$
2,
0
6
0
.
1
1
$
#5
0
6
5
9
0
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
Ru
s
c
h
N
a
s
o
-
G
a
s
t
r
i
c
T
u
b
e
s
(
3
1
-
3
6
)
31
NG
T
u
b
e
8
F
r
1
c
s
$
$
36
.
0
0
$
36
.
0
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
37
.
5
1
$
37
.
5
1
$
72
.
0
0
$
72
.
0
0
$
37
.
4
5
$
37
.
4
5
$
$
$
46
.
0
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
#2
3
5
2
1
0
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
32
NG
T
u
b
e
1
0
F
r
1
c
s
$
$
36
.
0
0
$
36
.
0
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
97
.
5
1
$
97
.
5
1
$
72
.
0
0
$
72
.
0
0
$
37
.
4
5
$
37
.
4
5
$
$
$
46
.
0
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
#2
3
5
2
1
0
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
33
NG
T
u
b
e
1
2
F
r
1
c
s
$
$
36
.
0
0
$
36
.
0
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
97
.
5
1
$
97
.
5
1
$
72
.
0
0
$
72
.
0
0
$
37
.
4
5
$
37
.
4
5
$
$
$
46
.
0
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
#2
3
5
2
1
0
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
34
NG
T
u
b
e
1
4
F
r
1
c
s
$
$
36
.
0
0
$
36
.
0
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
97
.
5
1
$
97
.
5
1
$
72
.
0
0
$
72
.
0
0
$
37
.
4
5
$
37
.
4
5
$
$
$
46
.
0
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
#2
3
5
2
1
0
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
35
NG
T
u
b
e
1
6
F
r
1
c
s
$
$
36
.
0
0
$
36
.
0
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
97
.
5
1
$
97
.
5
1
$
72
.
0
0
$
72
.
0
0
$
37
.
4
5
$
37
.
4
5
$
$
$
46
.
0
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
#2
3
5
2
1
0
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
36
NG
T
u
b
e
1
8
F
r
1
c
s
$
$
36
.
0
0
$
36
.
0
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
47
.
5
0
$
97
.
5
1
$
97
.
5
1
$
72
.
0
0
$
72
.
0
0
$
37
.
4
5
$
37
.
4
5
$
$
$
46
.
0
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
#2
3
5
2
1
0
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
37
E.
T
.
T
u
b
e
H
o
l
d
e
r
P
e
d
i
a
t
r
i
c
5
c
s
$
$
26
5
.
0
0
$
1,
3
2
5
.
0
0
$
34
9
.
0
0
$
1,
7
4
5
.
0
0
$
26
4
.
0
1
$
1,
3
2
0
.
0
5
$
36
5
.
0
0
$
1,
8
2
5
.
0
0
$
26
8
.
0
0
$
1,
3
4
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
33
3
.
0
0
$
1,
6
6
5
.
0
0
$
Th
o
m
a
s
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
H
o
l
d
e
r
#0
4
5
0
0
,
c
s
o
f
1
0
0
ST
I
M
E
D
I
C
A
L
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
38
E.
T
.
T
u
b
e
H
o
l
d
e
r
P
e
d
i
a
t
r
i
c
11
c
s
$
$
26
5
.
0
0
$
2,
9
1
5
.
0
0
$
34
9
.
0
0
$
3,
8
3
9
.
0
0
$
26
4
.
0
1
$
2,
9
0
4
.
1
1
$
36
5
.
0
0
$
4,
0
1
5
.
0
0
$
26
8
.
0
0
$
2,
9
4
8
.
0
0
$
$
$
33
3
.
0
0
$
3,
6
6
3
.
0
0
$
Th
o
m
a
s
E
.
T
.
T
u
b
e
H
o
l
d
e
r
#0
4
4
0
0
,
c
s
o
f
1
0
0
ST
I
M
E
D
I
C
A
L
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
39
Co
o
k
P
n
e
u
m
o
K
i
t
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
25
e
a
$
$
88
.
0
2
$
2,
2
0
0
.
5
0
$
84
.
7
2
$
2,
1
1
8
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
92
.
5
7
$
2,
3
1
4
.
2
5
$
$
$
91
.
6
3
$
2,
2
9
0
.
7
5
$
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
P
n
e
u
m
o
t
h
o
r
a
x
S
e
t
#C
o
o
k
9
1
1
-
C
O
O
K
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
40
EI
D
S
y
r
i
n
g
e
M
o
d
e
l
4b
x
$
$
40
.
0
0
$
16
0
.
0
0
$
69
.
4
0
$
27
7
.
6
0
$
63
.
0
1
$
25
2
.
0
4
$
$
$
78
.
8
2
$
31
5
.
2
8
$
$
$
62
.
0
0
$
24
8
.
0
0
$
Es
o
p
h
a
g
e
a
l
I
n
t
u
b
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
#E
I
D
1
0
0
,
b
x
o
f
2
0
WO
L
F
T
R
O
Y
M
E
D
I
C
A
L
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
2
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
41
Lu
b
r
i
c
a
t
i
n
g
j
e
l
l
y
P
a
c
k
e
t
s
9b
x
$
$
7.
2
7
$
65
.
4
3
$
9.
2
9
$
83
.
6
1
$
6.
9
5
$
62
.
5
5
$
7.
9
9
$
71
.
9
1
$
5.
8
6
$
52
.
7
4
$
$
$
5.
5
6
$
50
.
0
4
$
Ai
r
w
a
y
L
u
b
r
i
c
a
n
t
s
#0
0
1
2
8
,
b
x
o
f
1
4
4
Jo
h
n
s
o
n
&
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
/
P
D
I
or
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
Su
n
M
e
d
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
F
i
b
e
r
O
p
t
i
c
L
a
r
y
n
g
o
s
c
o
p
e
B
l
a
d
e
s
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
i
t
u
d
e
(
4
2
-
4
8
)
42
Ma
c
i
n
t
o
s
h
C
h
i
l
d
S
i
z
e
2
50
e
a
$
$
3.
2
6
$
16
3
.
0
0
$
5.
6
5
$
28
2
.
5
0
$
4.
3
5
$
21
7
.
5
0
$
3.
8
5
$
19
2
.
5
0
$
3.
7
1
$
18
5
.
5
0
$
$
$
4.
0
9
$
20
4
.
5
0
$
#5
-
5
3
3
2
-
0
2
43
Ma
c
i
n
t
o
s
h
C
h
i
l
d
S
i
z
e
3
11
0
e
a
$
$
3.
2
6
$
35
8
.
6
0
$
5.
6
5
$
62
1
.
5
0
$
4.
3
5
$
47
8
.
5
0
$
3.
8
5
$
42
3
.
5
0
$
3.
7
1
$
40
8
.
1
0
$
$
$
4.
0
9
$
44
9
.
9
0
$
#5
-
5
3
3
2
-
0
3
44
Ma
c
i
n
t
o
s
h
C
h
i
l
d
S
i
z
e
4
11
0
e
a
$
$
3.
2
6
$
35
8
.
6
0
$
5.
6
5
$
62
1
.
5
0
$
4.
3
5
$
47
8
.
5
0
$
3.
8
5
$
42
3
.
5
0
$
3.
7
1
$
40
8
.
1
0
$
$
$
4.
0
9
$
44
9
.
9
0
$
#5
-
5
3
3
2
-
0
4
45
Mi
l
l
e
r
P
r
e
m
a
t
u
r
e
S
i
z
e
0
50
e
a
$
$
3.
2
6
$
16
3
.
0
0
$
5.
6
5
$
28
2
.
5
0
$
4.
3
5
$
21
7
.
5
0
$
3.
8
5
$
19
2
.
5
0
$
3.
7
1
$
18
5
.
5
0
$
$
$
4.
0
9
$
20
4
.
5
0
$
#5
-
5
3
3
3
-
0
0
46
Mi
l
l
e
r
I
n
f
a
n
t
S
i
z
e
1
50
e
a
$
$
3.
2
6
$
16
3
.
0
0
$
5.
6
5
$
28
2
.
5
0
$
4.
3
5
$
21
7
.
5
0
$
3.
8
5
$
19
2
.
5
0
$
3.
7
1
$
18
5
.
5
0
$
$
$
4.
0
9
$
20
4
.
5
0
$
#5
-
5
3
3
3
-
0
1
47
Mi
l
l
e
r
C
h
i
l
d
S
i
z
e
2
50
e
a
$
$
3.
2
6
$
16
3
.
0
0
$
5.
6
5
$
28
2
.
5
0
$
4.
3
5
$
21
7
.
5
0
$
3.
8
5
$
19
2
.
5
0
$
3.
7
1
$
18
5
.
5
0
$
$
$
4.
0
9
$
20
4
.
5
0
$
#5
-
5
3
3
3
-
0
2
48
Mi
l
l
e
r
A
d
u
l
t
S
i
z
e
3
13
0
e
a
$
$
3.
2
6
$
42
3
.
8
0
$
5.
6
5
$
73
4
.
5
0
$
4.
3
5
$
56
5
.
5
0
$
3.
8
5
$
50
0
.
5
0
$
3.
7
1
$
48
2
.
3
0
$
$
$
4.
0
9
$
53
1
.
7
0
$
#5
-
5
3
3
3
-
0
3
49
Su
n
M
e
d
G
r
e
e
n
l
i
n
e
20
e
a
$
$
31
.
2
5
$
62
5
.
0
0
$
55
.
1
0
$
1,
1
0
2
.
0
0
$
16
.
1
3
$
32
2
.
6
0
$
29
.
9
0
$
59
8
.
0
0
$
34
.
1
4
$
68
2
.
8
0
$
$
$
37
.
4
5
$
74
9
.
0
0
$
Fi
b
e
r
O
p
t
i
c
H
a
n
d
l
e
,
P
e
n
l
i
t
e
(C
h
r
o
m
e
-
P
l
a
t
e
d
B
r
a
s
s
)
50
Su
n
M
e
d
G
r
e
e
n
l
i
n
e
20
e
a
$
$
31
.
2
5
$
62
5
.
0
0
$
55
.
1
0
$
1,
1
0
2
.
0
0
$
16
.
1
3
$
32
2
.
6
0
$
29
.
9
0
$
59
8
.
0
0
$
34
.
1
4
$
68
2
.
8
0
$
$
$
37
.
4
5
$
74
9
.
0
0
$
Fi
b
e
r
O
p
t
i
c
H
a
n
d
l
e
,
M
e
d
i
u
m
(C
h
r
o
m
e
-
P
l
a
t
e
d
B
r
a
s
s
)
51
Ya
n
k
a
e
u
r
S
u
c
t
i
o
n
T
i
p
w
/
7
2
”
t
u
b
i
n
g
40
c
s
$
$
22
.
6
0
$
90
4
.
0
0
$
25
.
8
8
$
1,
0
3
5
.
2
0
$
28
.
6
1
$
1,
1
4
4
.
4
0
$
21
.
1
0
$
84
4
.
0
0
$
25
.
4
0
$
1,
0
1
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
26
.
8
0
$
1,
0
7
2
.
0
0
$
#5
0
1
2
2
,
c
s
o
f
2
0
(D
y
n
a
r
e
x
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
Ru
s
c
h
S
o
f
t
T
i
p
S
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
a
t
h
e
t
e
r
s
(
5
2
-
5
8
)
52
Su
c
t
i
o
n
C
a
t
h
e
t
e
r
6
F
r
4c
s
$
$
7.
5
0
$
30
.
0
0
$
10
.
3
5
$
41
.
4
0
$
17
.
0
1
$
68
.
0
4
$
11
.
5
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
8.
8
2
$
35
.
2
8
$
$
$
19
.
5
0
$
78
.
0
0
$
#4
0
1
0
6
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
53
Su
c
t
i
o
n
C
a
t
h
e
t
e
r
8
F
r
4c
s
$
$
7.
5
0
$
30
.
0
0
$
10
.
3
5
$
41
.
4
0
$
17
.
0
1
$
68
.
0
4
$
11
.
5
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
8.
8
2
$
35
.
2
8
$
$
$
19
.
5
0
$
78
.
0
0
$
#4
0
1
0
8
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
54
Su
c
t
i
o
n
C
a
t
h
e
t
e
r
1
0
F
r
4c
s
$
$
7.
5
0
$
30
.
0
0
$
10
.
3
5
$
41
.
4
0
$
17
.
0
1
$
68
.
0
4
$
11
.
5
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
8.
8
2
$
35
.
2
8
$
$
$
19
.
5
0
$
78
.
0
0
$
#4
0
1
1
0
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
55
Su
c
t
i
o
n
C
a
t
h
e
t
e
r
1
2
F
r
4c
s
$
$
7.
5
0
$
30
.
0
0
$
10
.
3
5
$
41
.
4
0
$
17
.
0
1
$
68
.
0
4
$
11
.
5
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
8.
8
2
$
35
.
2
8
$
$
$
19
.
5
0
$
78
.
0
0
$
#4
0
1
1
2
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
56
Su
c
t
i
o
n
C
a
t
h
e
t
e
r
1
4
F
r
4c
s
$
$
7.
5
0
$
30
.
0
0
$
10
.
3
5
$
41
.
4
0
$
17
.
0
1
$
68
.
0
4
$
11
.
5
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
8.
8
2
$
35
.
2
8
$
$
$
19
.
5
0
$
78
.
0
0
$
#4
0
1
1
4
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
57
Su
c
t
i
o
n
C
a
t
h
e
t
e
r
1
6
F
r
4c
s
$
$
7.
5
0
$
30
.
0
0
$
10
.
3
5
$
41
.
4
0
$
17
.
0
1
$
68
.
0
4
$
11
.
5
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
8.
8
2
$
35
.
2
8
$
$
$
19
.
5
0
$
78
.
0
0
$
#4
0
1
1
6
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
58
Su
c
t
i
o
n
C
a
t
h
e
t
e
r
1
8
F
r
4c
s
$
$
7.
5
0
$
30
.
0
0
$
10
.
3
5
$
41
.
4
0
$
17
.
0
1
$
68
.
0
4
$
11
.
5
0
$
46
.
0
0
$
8.
8
2
$
35
.
2
8
$
$
$
19
.
5
0
$
78
.
0
0
$
#4
0
1
1
8
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
59
Ca
t
h
e
t
e
r
&
S
l
e
e
v
e
1
8
F
r
4c
s
$
$
63
.
0
9
$
25
2
.
3
6
$
52
.
1
2
$
20
8
.
4
8
$
11
7
.
7
0
$
47
0
.
8
0
$
$
$
62
.
3
4
$
24
9
.
3
6
$
$
$
93
.
5
0
$
37
4
.
0
0
$
#T
1
6
2
C
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
(P
h
a
r
m
a
s
e
a
l
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
3
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
60
O2
T
r
e
e
-
P
l
a
s
t
i
c
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
50
e
a
$
$
0.
3
9
$
19
.
5
0
$
0.
5
0
$
25
.
0
0
$
0.
4
5
$
22
.
5
0
$
0.
3
4
$
17
.
0
0
$
0.
3
5
$
17
.
5
0
$
$
$
0.
5
8
$
29
.
0
0
$
#2
5
5
5
,
p
r
i
c
e
p
e
r
e
a
Pr
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
o
r
a
p
p
r
e
q
u
a
l
61
As
p
i
r
a
t
o
r
,
M
e
c
o
n
i
u
m
24
e
a
$
$
4.
1
7
$
10
0
.
0
8
$
10
.
5
3
$
25
2
.
7
2
$
3.
9
4
$
94
.
5
6
$
4.
2
9
$
10
2
.
9
6
$
4.
2
0
$
10
0
.
8
0
$
$
$
4.
0
9
$
98
.
1
6
$
#0
1
0
1
,
p
r
i
c
e
p
e
r
e
a
(N
e
o
t
e
c
h
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
62
Cu
s
h
i
o
n
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
M
a
s
k
2c
s
$
$
43
.
5
0
$
87
.
0
0
$
81
.
5
0
$
16
3
.
0
0
$
41
.
1
1
$
82
.
2
2
$
23
.
1
9
$
46
.
3
8
$
46
.
5
9
$
93
.
1
8
$
$
$
49
.
2
0
$
98
.
4
0
$
Pe
d
i
a
t
r
i
c
M
a
s
k
#
1
5
8
2
0
0
,
c
s
o
f
3
0
(R
u
s
c
h
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
63
Cu
s
h
i
o
n
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
M
a
s
k
5c
s
$
$
43
.
5
0
$
21
7
.
5
0
$
81
.
5
0
$
40
7
.
5
0
$
41
.
1
1
$
20
5
.
5
5
$
23
.
1
9
$
11
5
.
9
5
$
46
.
5
9
$
23
2
.
9
5
$
$
$
49
.
2
0
$
24
6
.
0
0
$
Ad
u
l
t
M
a
s
k
#
1
5
8
6
0
0
,
c
s
o
f
3
0
(R
u
s
c
h
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
64
Bu
l
b
S
y
r
i
n
g
e
2
o
z
.
2c
s
$
$
35
.
5
0
$
71
.
0
0
$
44
.
5
0
$
89
.
0
0
$
40
.
0
1
$
80
.
0
2
$
18
.
9
5
$
37
.
9
0
$
32
.
2
8
$
64
.
5
6
$
$
$
44
.
5
0
$
89
.
0
0
$
#7
0
2
7
5
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
(M
e
d
l
i
n
e
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
65
Si
n
g
l
e
P
a
t
i
e
n
t
20
c
s
$
$
61
.
8
0
$
1,
2
3
6
.
0
0
$
11
9
.
5
0
$
2,
3
9
0
.
0
0
$
57
.
2
5
$
1,
1
4
5
.
0
0
$
$
$
69
.
3
6
$
1,
3
8
7
.
2
0
$
$
$
69
.
0
0
$
1,
3
8
0
.
0
0
$
Ve
n
t
C
i
r
c
u
i
t
#
6
2
2
0
,
c
s
o
f
1
2
Ru
s
c
h
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
M
a
n
n
u
a
l
R
e
s
u
s
c
i
t
a
t
o
r
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
(
6
6
-
6
8
)
66
Ad
u
l
t
B
V
M
2
5
0
e
a
$
$
11
.
4
4
$
2,
8
6
0
.
0
0
$
10
.
5
0
$
2,
6
2
5
.
0
0
$
12
.
4
8
$
3,
1
2
0
.
0
0
$
12
.
6
9
$
3,
1
7
2
.
5
0
$
13
.
0
8
$
3,
2
7
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
10
.
2
3
$
2,
5
5
7
.
5
0
$
w/
B
a
g
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
,
M
a
s
k
&
T
u
b
i
n
g
15
7
1
0
0
3
0
0
67
Pe
d
i
a
t
r
i
c
B
V
M
2
0
0
e
a
$
$
11
.
4
4
$
2,
2
8
8
.
0
0
$
10
.
5
0
$
2,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
15
.
3
9
$
3,
0
7
8
.
0
0
$
15
.
8
1
$
3,
1
6
2
.
0
0
$
13
.
0
8
$
2,
6
1
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
15
.
5
0
$
3,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
w/
B
a
g
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
,
M
a
s
k
&
T
u
b
i
n
g
15
7
3
0
0
1
0
0
68
In
f
a
n
t
B
V
M
1
5
0
e
a
$
$
11
.
4
4
$
1,
7
1
6
.
0
0
$
10
.
5
0
$
1,
5
7
5
.
0
0
$
14
.
9
4
$
2,
2
4
1
.
0
0
$
16
.
1
9
$
2,
4
2
8
.
5
0
$
13
.
0
8
$
1,
9
6
2
.
0
0
$
$
$
14
.
8
0
$
2,
2
2
0
.
0
0
$
w/
B
a
g
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
,
M
a
s
k
&
T
u
b
i
n
g
15
7
4
0
0
1
0
0
69
CP
R
M
i
c
r
o
s
h
i
e
l
d
1
2
c
s
$
$
22
2
.
5
0
$
2,
6
7
0
.
0
0
$
26
7
.
8
2
$
3,
2
1
3
.
8
4
$
22
3
.
5
1
$
2,
6
8
2
.
1
2
$
94
.
5
0
$
1,
1
3
4
.
0
0
$
23
1
.
7
0
$
2,
7
8
0
.
4
0
$
$
$
28
0
.
5
0
$
3,
3
6
6
.
0
0
$
Ta
m
p
e
r
E
v
i
d
e
n
t
P
o
u
c
h
#7
0
-
1
5
5
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
70
Na
s
a
l
C
a
n
n
u
l
a
s
P
e
d
i
a
t
r
i
c
3
c
s
$
$
17
.
0
0
$
51
.
0
0
$
16
.
0
0
$
48
.
0
0
$
10
.
7
9
$
32
.
3
7
$
13
.
3
9
$
40
.
1
7
$
18
.
9
5
$
56
.
8
5
$
$
$
19
.
5
0
$
58
.
5
0
$
w/
t
u
b
i
n
g
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
Hu
d
s
o
n
#
1
1
0
1
71
Me
d
i
u
m
C
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
s
k
3
c
s
$
$
39
.
0
0
$
11
7
.
0
0
$
52
.
3
2
$
15
6
.
9
6
$
60
.
0
1
$
18
0
.
0
3
$
24
.
5
0
$
73
.
5
0
$
27
.
2
7
$
81
.
8
1
$
$
$
37
.
5
0
$
11
2
.
5
0
$
Pe
d
i
a
t
r
i
c
w
/
t
u
b
i
n
g
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
Hu
d
s
o
n
#
1
0
3
5
72
Me
d
i
u
m
C
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
s
k
1
c
s
$
$
72
.
5
0
$
72
.
5
0
$
99
.
5
0
$
99
.
5
0
$
14
4
.
5
1
$
14
4
.
5
1
$
47
.
1
9
$
47
.
1
9
$
38
.
6
6
$
38
.
6
6
$
$
$
43
.
5
0
$
43
.
5
0
$
In
f
a
n
t
w
/
t
u
b
i
n
g
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
Li
f
e
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
#
6
2
1
8
or
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
73
No
n
-
B
r
e
a
t
h
i
n
g
M
a
s
k
w
/
s
a
f
e
t
y
v
e
n
t
5
6
c
s
$
$
50
.
5
0
$
2,
8
2
8
.
0
0
$
39
.
5
0
$
2,
2
1
2
.
0
0
$
59
.
0
1
$
3,
3
0
4
.
5
6
$
33
.
1
9
$
1,
8
5
8
.
6
4
$
35
.
8
0
$
2,
0
0
4
.
8
0
$
$
$
30
.
5
0
$
1,
7
0
8
.
0
0
$
Ad
u
l
t
w
/
t
u
b
i
n
g
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
Hu
d
s
o
n
#
1
0
5
9
74
Ae
r
o
s
o
l
M
a
s
k
-
A
d
u
l
t
M
a
s
k
O
n
l
y
3
c
s
$
$
23
.
3
1
$
69
.
9
3
$
47
.
5
0
$
14
2
.
5
0
$
22
.
5
1
$
67
.
5
3
$
21
.
8
9
$
65
.
6
7
$
18
.
7
8
$
56
.
3
4
$
$
$
28
.
0
0
$
84
.
0
0
$
#6
4
0
8
3
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
Li
f
e
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
P
r
o
d
o
r
a
p
p
r
e
q
u
a
l
75
Mi
c
r
o
m
i
s
t
N
e
b
u
l
i
z
e
r
3
0
8
c
s
$
$
41
.
0
0
$
12
,
6
2
8
.
0
0
$
45
.
5
5
$
14
,
0
2
9
.
4
0
$
40
.
5
1
$
12
,
4
7
7
.
0
8
$
38
.
1
9
$
11
,
7
6
2
.
5
2
$
30
.
6
8
$
9,
4
4
9
.
4
4
$
$
$
36
.
5
0
$
11
,
2
4
2
.
0
0
$
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
H
a
n
d
H
e
l
d
K
i
t
Hu
d
s
o
n
#
1
8
8
3
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
4
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
76
Di
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
S
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
a
n
i
s
t
e
r
6
c
s
$
$
34
4
.
0
0
$
2,
0
6
4
.
0
0
$
34
7
.
0
2
$
2,
0
8
2
.
1
2
$
32
8
.
6
7
$
1,
9
7
2
.
0
2
$
21
1
.
0
0
$
1,
2
6
6
.
0
0
$
36
2
.
5
4
$
2,
1
7
5
.
2
4
$
$
$
34
3
.
5
0
$
2,
0
6
1
.
0
0
$
Fo
r
I
m
p
a
c
t
#
3
0
5
C
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
IM
P
A
C
T
-
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
77
Na
s
a
l
C
a
n
n
u
l
a
s
A
d
u
l
t
1
0
2
c
s
$
$
14
.
0
0
$
1,
4
2
8
.
0
0
$
14
.
5
0
$
1,
4
7
9
.
0
0
$
8.
9
9
$
91
6
.
9
8
$
12
.
9
5
$
1,
3
2
0
.
9
0
$
13
.
0
0
$
1,
3
2
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
27
.
5
0
$
2,
8
0
5
.
0
0
$
w/
t
u
b
i
n
g
,
c
s
o
f
5
0
Hu
d
s
o
n
#
1
1
0
4
78
Ki
n
g
A
i
r
w
a
y
K
i
t
20
e
a
$
$
26
.
7
9
$
53
5
.
8
0
$
35
.
1
2
$
70
2
.
4
0
$
32
.
6
0
$
65
2
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
36
.
9
5
$
73
9
.
0
0
$
LT
-
D
,
s
i
z
e
2
79
Ki
n
g
A
i
r
w
a
y
K
i
t
20
e
a
$
$
24
.
4
0
$
48
8
.
0
0
$
35
.
1
2
$
70
2
.
4
0
$
30
.
9
1
$
61
8
.
2
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
31
.
9
5
$
63
9
.
0
0
$
LT
-
D
,
s
i
z
e
3
80
Ki
n
g
A
i
r
w
a
y
K
i
t
20
e
a
$
$
24
.
4
0
$
48
8
.
0
0
$
35
.
1
2
$
70
2
.
4
0
$
30
.
9
1
$
61
8
.
2
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
31
.
9
5
$
63
9
.
0
0
$
LT
-
D
,
s
i
z
e
4
81
Ki
n
g
A
i
r
w
a
y
K
i
t
20
e
a
$
$
24
.
4
0
$
48
8
.
0
0
$
35
.
1
2
$
70
2
.
4
0
$
30
.
9
1
$
61
8
.
2
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
31
.
9
5
$
63
9
.
0
0
$
LT
-
D
,
s
i
z
e
5
82
O2
R
E
S
Q
B
I
T
R
A
C
E
D
M
A
S
K
10
c
s
$
$
34
1
.
5
0
$
3,
4
1
5
.
0
0
$
57
8
.
5
0
$
5,
7
8
5
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
61
.
9
5
$
61
9
.
5
0
$
w/
3
s
e
t
v
a
l
v
e
(
5
.
0
/
7
.
5
/
1
0
.
0
c
m
)
&
F
l
o
w
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
,
A
d
u
l
t
M
a
s
k
1
0
p
e
r
c
s
GR
O
U
P
1
G
R
A
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
$
58
,
6
8
1
.
5
0
$
3,
8
3
6
.
0
0
$
66
,
8
9
5
.
2
9
$
3,
4
4
1
.
2
5
$
65
,
0
5
9
.
8
8
$
2,
3
5
9
.
1
9
$
48
,
2
6
0
.
1
4
$
2,
5
9
3
.
9
4
$
50
,
0
8
5
.
2
9
$
$
$
3,
5
2
3
.
3
4
$
68
,
9
8
3
.
4
1
$
(I
t
e
m
s
1
-
8
2
)
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
D
I
S
C
O
U
N
T
O
F
F
L
I
S
T
P
R
I
C
E
F
O
R
I
T
E
M
S
S
I
M
I
L
A
R
T
O
,
B
U
T
N
O
T
L
I
S
T
E
D
I
N
T
H
I
S
G
R
O
U
P
:
0%
1
0
.
0
%
1
5
.
6
%
0
.
0
%
0
%
0
.
0
%
1
5
.
0
%
GR
O
U
P
2
-
I
N
T
R
A
V
E
N
O
U
S
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
:
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
v
e
I
V
-
P
l
u
s
S
a
f
e
t
y
I
.
V
.
C
a
t
h
e
t
e
r
(
7
8
-
8
3
)
83
14
G
a
u
g
e
x
1
.
2
5
”
50
b
x
$
$
81
.
0
0
$
4,
0
5
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
87
.
0
6
$
4,
3
5
3
.
0
0
$
88
.
8
9
$
4,
4
4
4
.
5
0
$
84
.
7
8
$
4,
2
3
9
.
0
0
$
$
$
82
.
4
9
$
4,
1
2
4
.
5
0
$
#3
0
6
8
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
84
16
G
a
u
g
e
x
1
.
2
5
”
50
b
x
$
$
81
.
0
0
$
4,
0
5
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
87
.
0
6
$
4,
3
5
3
.
0
0
$
88
.
8
9
$
4,
4
4
4
.
5
0
$
84
.
7
8
$
4,
2
3
9
.
0
0
$
$
$
82
.
4
9
$
4,
1
2
4
.
5
0
$
#3
0
6
2
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
85
18
G
a
u
g
e
x
1
.
2
5
”
80
b
x
$
$
81
.
0
0
$
6,
4
8
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
87
.
0
6
$
6,
9
6
4
.
8
0
$
88
.
8
9
$
7,
1
1
1
.
2
0
$
84
.
7
8
$
6,
7
8
2
.
4
0
$
$
$
82
.
4
9
$
6,
5
9
9
.
2
0
$
#3
0
6
5
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
86
20
G
a
u
g
e
x
1
.
2
5
”
70
b
x
$
$
81
.
0
0
$
5,
6
7
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
87
.
0
6
$
6,
0
9
4
.
2
0
$
88
.
8
9
$
6,
2
2
2
.
3
0
$
84
.
7
8
$
5,
9
3
4
.
6
0
$
$
$
82
.
4
9
$
5,
7
7
4
.
3
0
$
#3
0
6
6
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
87
22
G
a
u
g
e
x
1
”
44
b
x
$
$
81
.
0
0
$
3,
5
6
4
.
0
0
$
$
$
87
.
0
1
$
3,
8
2
8
.
4
4
$
88
.
8
9
$
3,
9
1
1
.
1
6
$
84
.
7
8
$
3,
7
3
0
.
3
2
$
$
$
82
.
4
9
$
3,
6
2
9
.
5
6
$
#3
0
6
0
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
88
24
G
a
u
g
e
x
.
7
5
”
40
b
x
$
$
87
.
5
0
$
3,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
87
.
0
6
$
3,
4
8
2
.
4
0
$
88
.
8
9
$
3,
5
5
5
.
6
0
$
84
.
7
8
$
3,
3
9
1
.
2
0
$
$
$
82
.
4
9
$
3,
2
9
9
.
6
0
$
#3
0
6
3
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
89
Ve
n
i
-
G
a
r
d
s
A
d
u
l
t
s
10
b
x
$
$
35
.
7
1
$
35
7
.
1
0
$
$
$
89
.
8
9
$
89
8
.
9
0
$
42
.
5
0
$
42
5
.
0
0
$
73
.
3
2
$
73
3
.
2
0
$
$
$
70
.
1
8
$
70
1
.
8
0
$
#7
0
5
4
4
3
1
,
b
x
o
f
2
0
0
-
C
o
n
m
e
d
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
90
Se
l
e
c
t
-
3
I
.
V
.
S
y
s
t
e
m
+
N
I
S
+
L
A
S
50
c
s
$
$
26
9
.
2
8
$
13
,
4
6
4
.
0
0
$
$
$
25
7
.
2
8
$
12
,
8
6
4
.
0
0
$
$
$
28
7
.
7
9
$
14
,
3
8
9
.
5
0
$
$
$
31
2
.
0
0
$
15
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
#B
-
3
2
-
1
0
2
c
s
o
f
4
8
-
B
i
o
m
e
d
i
x
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
91
I.
V
.
S
t
a
r
t
K
i
t
L
a
t
e
x
F
r
e
e
-
E
M
P
50
c
s
$
$
94
.
0
0
$
4,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
91
.
0
1
$
4,
5
5
0
.
5
0
$
$
$
11
4
.
8
4
$
5,
7
4
2
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
92
Bu
r
e
t
r
o
l
S
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
S
e
t
1
5
0
m
L
B
u
r
e
t
t
e
1c
s
$
$
32
0
.
6
4
$
32
0
.
6
4
$
$
$
30
2
.
5
7
$
30
2
.
5
7
$
$
$
13
0
.
9
5
$
13
0
.
9
5
$
$
$
$
$
(B
a
l
l
V
a
l
u
e
)
a
n
d
2
i
n
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
i
t
e
s
#2
C
7
5
4
6
,
c
s
o
f
4
8
(B
a
x
t
e
r
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
5
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
93
Me
d
i
c
-
P
l
a
s
t
i
c
A
n
t
i
-
S
t
i
c
k
20
b
x
$
$
11
0
.
0
0
$
2,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
11
5
.
0
1
$
2,
3
0
0
.
2
0
$
$
$
13
9
.
6
2
$
2,
7
9
2
.
4
0
$
$
$
22
8
.
0
0
$
4,
5
6
0
.
0
0
$
#N
F
9
2
8
5
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
0
(B
.
B
r
a
u
n
)
94
Ex
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
S
e
t
w
/
U
l
t
r
a
s
i
t
e
I
n
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
S
i
t
e
,
40
0
e
a
$
$
3.
0
0
$
1,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
2.
8
2
$
1,
1
2
8
.
0
0
$
$
$
2.
7
7
$
1,
1
0
8
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
an
d
S
a
f
e
L
i
n
e
i
n
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
S
i
t
e
o
n
T
-
P
o
r
t
#4
7
0
0
6
0
(
B
.
B
r
a
u
n
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
s
)
95
0.
9
%
S
o
d
i
u
m
C
h
l
o
r
i
d
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
10
c
s
$
$
11
2
.
4
8
$
1,
1
2
4
.
8
0
$
$
$
10
6
.
3
7
$
1,
0
6
3
.
7
0
$
$
$
13
0
.
5
6
$
1,
3
0
5
.
6
0
$
$
$
$
$
50
m
L
,
9
6
p
e
r
c
s
ND
C
0
3
3
8
-
0
0
4
9
-
4
1
96
0.
9
%
S
o
d
i
u
m
C
h
l
o
r
i
d
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
28
0
c
s
$
$
19
.
2
0
$
5,
3
7
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
31
.
2
1
$
8,
7
3
8
.
8
0
$
$
$
22
.
4
0
$
6,
2
7
2
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
50
0
m
L
,
2
4
p
e
r
c
s
ND
C
0
3
3
8
-
0
0
4
9
-
0
3
97
0.
9
%
S
o
d
i
u
m
C
h
l
o
r
i
d
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
40
c
s
$
$
12
.
6
0
$
50
4
.
0
0
$
$
$
13
.
3
1
$
53
2
.
4
0
$
$
$
16
.
2
0
$
64
8
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
10
0
0
m
L
,
1
4
p
e
r
c
s
ND
C
4
6
1
6
3
-
3
0
0
-
1
0
98
5%
D
e
x
t
r
o
s
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
20
c
s
$
$
30
.
6
0
$
61
2
.
0
0
$
$
$
65
.
8
9
$
1,
3
1
7
.
8
0
$
$
$
30
.
7
6
$
61
5
.
2
0
$
$
$
$
$
25
0
m
L
,
3
6
p
e
r
c
s
ND
C
5
4
8
6
8
-
0
2
9
6
-
2
99
10
%
D
e
x
t
r
o
s
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
2
5
0
m
L
,
20
e
a
$
$
1.
9
8
$
39
.
6
0
$
$
$
1.
8
6
$
37
.
2
0
$
$
$
1.
8
2
$
36
.
4
0
$
$
$
$
$
ND
C
0
3
3
8
-
0
0
2
3
-
0
2
10
0
Di
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
P
a
d
d
e
d
B
o
a
r
d
10
c
s
$
$
62
.
0
0
$
62
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
80
.
0
1
$
80
0
.
1
0
$
$
$
69
.
7
8
$
69
7
.
8
0
$
$
$
70
.
6
1
$
70
6
.
1
0
$
Wi
t
h
V
i
n
y
l
c
s
3
”
x
9
”
#9
5
0
2
1
,
c
s
o
f
1
0
0
10
1
Di
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
P
a
d
d
e
d
B
o
a
r
d
10
c
s
$
$
60
.
0
0
$
60
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
10
5
.
0
1
$
1,
0
5
0
.
1
0
$
$
$
10
4
.
5
8
$
1,
0
4
5
.
8
0
$
$
$
10
7
.
8
9
$
1,
0
7
8
.
9
0
$
Wi
t
h
V
i
n
y
l
c
s
3
”
x
0
8
”
#9
5
0
2
2
,
c
s
o
f
1
0
0
10
2
We
b
c
o
l
I
.
V
.
p
r
e
p
P
a
d
s
34
b
x
$
$
1.
5
3
$
52
.
0
2
$
$
$
1.
2
2
$
41
.
4
8
$
2.
1
0
$
71
.
4
0
$
1.
2
9
$
43
.
8
6
$
$
$
1.
5
2
$
51
.
6
8
$
Me
d
i
u
m
,
#
6
8
1
8
b
x
o
f
2
0
0
(K
e
n
d
a
l
l
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
10
3
To
u
r
n
i
q
u
e
t
s
L
a
t
e
x
-
F
r
e
e
10
p
k
g
$
$
87
.
0
0
$
87
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
8.
2
3
$
82
.
3
0
$
2.
2
5
$
22
.
5
0
$
1.
6
5
$
16
.
5
0
$
$
$
3.
8
0
$
38
.
0
0
$
#4
5
0
1
8
,
P
a
c
k
a
g
e
o
f
2
5
Va
n
i
s
h
p
o
i
n
t
S
y
r
i
n
g
s
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
d
e
(
10
4
-
1
0
5
)
10
4
1
c
c
,
2
1
g
a
u
g
e
x
1
”
40
b
x
$
$
67
.
8
2
$
2,
7
1
2
.
8
0
$
$
$
70
.
0
9
$
2,
8
0
3
.
6
0
$
$
$
50
.
7
5
$
2,
0
3
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
#1
0
1
6
1
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
0
10
5
3
c
c
,
2
1
g
a
u
g
e
x
1
.
5
”
40
b
x
$
$
55
.
8
8
$
2,
2
3
5
.
2
0
$
$
$
41
.
9
6
$
1,
6
7
8
.
4
0
$
$
$
44
.
7
5
$
1,
7
9
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
#1
0
3
6
1
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
0
10
6
10
c
c
,
2
1
g
a
u
g
e
x
1
.
5
”
40
b
x
$
$
11
7
.
6
5
$
4,
7
0
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
52
.
1
3
$
2,
0
8
5
.
2
0
$
$
$
55
.
5
5
$
2,
2
2
2
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
#
1
1
0
6
1
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
0
10
7
Lu
e
r
L
o
c
k
S
y
r
i
n
g
e
w
/
n
e
e
d
l
e
20
b
x
$
$
11
.
0
0
$
22
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
15
.
1
8
$
30
3
.
6
0
$
$
$
8.
4
1
$
16
8
.
2
0
$
$
$
8.
1
9
$
16
3
.
8
0
$
1
c
c
t
u
b
e
,
2
5
g
a
u
g
e
x
5
/
8
”
n
e
e
d
l
e
10
0
p
e
r
b
x
(B
-
D
3
0
9
6
2
6
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
10
8
21
g
a
u
g
e
x
¾
”
w
/
1
2
”
t
u
b
e
1b
x
$
$
22
.
0
0
$
22
.
0
0
$
$
$
10
.
0
1
$
10
.
0
1
$
$
$
10
.
4
4
$
10
.
4
4
$
$
$
19
.
3
0
$
19
.
3
0
$
Ex
c
e
l
W
i
n
g
e
d
I
n
f
u
s
i
o
n
S
e
t
#2
6
7
0
4
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
10
9
23
g
a
u
g
e
x
¾
”
w
/
1
2
”
t
u
b
e
1b
x
$
$
22
.
0
0
$
22
.
0
0
$
$
$
50
.
5
0
$
50
.
5
0
$
$
$
10
.
4
4
$
10
.
4
4
$
$
$
19
.
3
0
$
19
.
3
0
$
Ex
c
e
l
W
i
n
g
e
d
I
n
f
u
s
i
o
n
S
e
t
#3
6
7
2
8
3
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
6
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
11
0
25
g
a
u
g
e
x
¾
”
w
/
1
2
”
t
u
b
e
1b
x
$
$
22
.
0
0
$
22
.
0
0
$
$
$
10
.
2
8
$
10
.
2
8
$
$
$
10
.
4
4
$
10
.
4
4
$
$
$
19
.
3
0
$
19
.
3
0
$
Ex
c
e
l
W
i
n
g
e
d
I
n
f
u
s
i
o
n
S
e
t
#2
6
7
0
8
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
11
1
0.
9
%
S
o
d
i
u
m
C
h
l
o
r
i
d
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
10
0
0
e
a
$
$
0.
3
6
$
36
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
0.
8
4
$
84
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
0.
3
8
$
38
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
10
c
c
,
P
r
e
f
i
l
l
e
d
-
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
S
y
r
i
n
g
e
w/
r
u
b
b
e
r
s
t
o
p
p
e
r
11
2
St
a
n
d
a
r
d
T
e
r
u
m
o
5b
x
$
$
13
.
0
0
$
65
.
0
0
$
$
$
9.
4
2
$
47
.
1
0
$
$
$
7.
9
3
$
39
.
6
5
$
$
$
9.
3
6
$
46
.
8
0
$
10
c
c
S
y
r
i
n
g
e
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
n
e
e
d
l
e
SS
-
1
0
L
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
0
11
3
30
-
3
5
c
c
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
1c
s
$
$
10
2
.
5
0
$
10
2
.
5
0
$
$
$
16
.
9
5
$
16
.
9
5
$
$
$
15
.
0
6
$
15
.
0
6
$
$
$
8.
1
9
$
8.
1
9
$
Sy
r
i
n
g
e
O
n
l
y
#2
6
2
9
0
,
b
x
o
f
5
0
,
c
s
o
f
5
b
x
11
4
50
c
c
S
y
r
i
n
g
e
c
E
c
c
e
n
t
r
i
c
T
i
p
,
3p
k
g
$
$
12
.
1
8
$
36
.
5
4
$
$
$
16
.
1
7
$
48
.
5
1
$
$
$
11
.
2
6
$
33
.
7
8
$
$
$
$
$
25
p
e
r
p
a
c
k
#
2
6
3
0
1
BX
/
2
5
(E
x
c
e
l
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
11
5
Fi
l
t
e
r
S
t
r
a
w
5
M
i
c
r
o
n
10
0
b
x
$
$
0.
5
0
$
50
.
0
0
$
$
$
0.
4
6
$
46
.
0
0
$
$
$
0.
3
6
6
2
$
36
.
6
2
$
$
$
49
.
1
2
$
4,
9
1
2
.
0
0
$
1.
7
”
#
4
1
5
0
2
1
#2
6
2
6
5
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
0
(B
.
B
r
a
u
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
GR
O
U
P
2
G
R
A
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
69
,
9
0
8
.
2
0
$
$
72
,
7
2
4
.
0
4
$
30
,
2
0
8
.
1
6
$
1,
8
6
2
.
7
9
$
70
,
6
4
0
.
3
6
$
$
55
,
4
7
6
.
8
3
$
(I
t
e
m
s
8
3
-
1
1
5
)
58
0
.
1
9
$
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
D
I
S
C
O
U
N
T
O
F
F
L
I
S
T
P
R
I
C
E
F
O
R
I
T
E
M
S
S
I
M
I
L
A
R
T
O
,
B
U
T
N
O
T
L
I
S
T
E
D
I
N
T
H
I
S
G
R
O
U
P
:
0%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
GR
O
U
P
3
-
M
E
D
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
:
11
6
Ad
e
n
o
s
i
n
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
90
e
a
$
$
4.
1
5
$
37
3
.
5
0
$
$
$
3.
4
0
$
30
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
6
m
g
/
2
m
L
v
i
a
l
ND
C
5
5
3
9
0
-
0
6
7
-
1
0
11
7
Ad
e
n
o
s
i
n
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
90
e
a
$
$
9.
1
6
$
82
4
.
4
0
$
$
$
2.
8
2
$
25
3
.
8
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12
m
g
/
4
m
L
v
i
a
l
ND
C
5
5
3
9
0
-
0
6
8
-
0
1
11
8
Al
b
u
t
e
r
o
l
S
u
l
f
a
t
e
I
n
h
a
l
a
t
i
o
n
S
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
50
0
e
a
$
$
0.
2
2
$
11
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
0.
2
0
$
10
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.
0
8
3
%
,
2
.
5
m
g
/
3
m
L
v
i
a
l
In
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
l
y
w
r
a
p
p
e
d
ND
C
0
4
8
7
-
9
5
0
1
-
0
1
9
(
n
o
s
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
s
)
11
9
Am
i
o
d
a
r
o
n
e
H
C
I
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
30
0
e
a
$
$
1.
7
1
$
51
3
.
0
0
$
$
$
1.
8
2
$
54
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
15
0
m
g
/
3
m
L
,
v
i
a
l
N
D
C
67
4
5
7
-
1
5
3
-
0
3
12
0
Am
m
o
n
i
a
I
n
h
a
l
a
n
t
s
60
b
x
$
$
2.
1
0
$
12
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
1.
4
2
$
85
.
2
0
$
1.
7
9
$
10
7
.
4
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.
3
m
L
,
b
x
o
f
1
0
ND
C
4
6
4
1
4
-
3
3
3
3
-
2
12
1
As
p
i
r
i
n
C
h
e
w
a
b
l
e
70
b
t
l
$
$
0.
8
0
$
56
.
0
0
$
$
$
0.
7
0
$
49
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
81
m
g
,
3
6
T
a
b
l
e
t
B
o
t
t
l
e
ND
C
5
7
8
9
6
-
9
1
1
-
3
6
12
2
At
r
o
p
i
n
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
40
e
a
$
$
23
.
0
0
$
92
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
14
.
0
6
$
56
2
.
4
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
40
0
m
c
g
/
m
L
,
2
0
m
L
v
i
a
l
ND
C
0
6
4
1
-
2
2
1
0
-
4
3
12
3
At
r
o
p
i
n
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
30
0
e
a
$
$
2.
5
0
$
75
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
3.
4
5
$
1,
0
3
5
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1
m
g
,
1
0
m
L
w
/
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
ND
C
0
5
4
8
-
3
3
3
9
-
0
0
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
7
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
12
4
Ca
l
c
i
u
m
C
h
l
o
r
i
d
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
10
0
e
a
$
$
2.
4
5
$
24
5
.
0
0
$
$
$
1.
8
9
$
18
9
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
10
%
,
1
0
0
m
g
/
m
L
,
w
/
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
ND
C
0
5
4
8
-
3
3
0
4
-
0
0
12
5
Ca
l
c
i
u
m
G
u
c
o
n
a
t
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
30
e
a
$
$
2.
4
3
$
72
.
9
0
$
$
$
2.
9
5
$
88
.
5
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
10
%
,
1
g
/
1
0
m
L
v
i
a
l
ND
C
0
5
1
7
-
3
9
1
0
-
2
5
12
6
Di
p
h
e
n
h
y
d
r
a
m
i
n
e
20
0
e
a
$
$
1.
0
3
$
20
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
0.
8
8
$
17
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
50
m
g
,
1
m
L
v
i
a
l
ND
C
6
3
3
2
3
-
0
6
6
4
-
0
1
12
7
De
x
t
r
o
s
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
30
e
a
$
$
2.
9
0
$
87
.
0
0
$
$
$
5.
1
1
$
15
3
.
3
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2.
5
g
m
.
,
1
0
m
L
w
/
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
ND
C
0
5
4
8
-
3
3
1
5
-
0
0
12
8
De
x
t
r
o
s
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
40
0
e
a
$
$
3.
6
5
$
1,
4
6
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
5.
4
0
$
2,
1
6
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25
g
m
.
,
5
0
m
L
w
/
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
ND
C
0
5
4
8
-
3
3
0
1
-
0
0
12
9
Di
l
t
i
a
z
e
m
H
C
I
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
20
b
x
$
$
22
.
0
0
$
44
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
8.
4
9
$
16
9
.
8
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25
m
g
/
5
m
L
,
1
0
v
i
a
l
/
b
x
ND
C
0
7
0
3
-
1
5
5
3
-
0
3
13
0
Do
p
a
m
i
n
e
H
C
I
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
10
0
e
a
$
$
0.
8
1
$
81
.
0
0
$
$
$
0.
9
1
$
91
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
40
0
m
g
/
1
0
m
L
ND
C
0
4
0
9
-
9
1
0
4
-
2
0
13
1
Ep
i
n
e
p
h
r
i
n
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
10
0
e
a
$
$
1.
1
5
$
11
5
.
0
0
$
$
$
1.
3
5
$
13
5
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1:
1
0
0
0
,
1
m
g
/
m
L
A
m
p
u
l
e
ND
C
0
4
0
9
-
7
2
4
1
-
0
1
13
2
Ep
i
n
e
p
h
r
i
n
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
60
0
e
a
$
$
2.
2
0
$
1,
3
2
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
3.
4
9
$
2,
0
9
4
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1:
1
0
0
0
,
1
m
g
/
1
0
,
w
/
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
ND
C
0
5
4
8
-
3
3
1
6
-
0
0
13
3
Et
o
m
i
d
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
70
e
a
$
$
10
.
9
5
$
76
6
.
5
0
$
$
$
7.
8
8
$
55
1
.
6
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
20
m
g
/
1
0
m
L
,
v
i
a
l
ND
C
0
4
0
9
6
-
6
9
5
-
0
1
13
4
Gl
u
c
a
g
e
n
(
G
l
u
c
o
g
o
n
-
D
N
A
o
r
i
g
i
n
)
50
e
a
$
$
10
2
.
0
0
$
5,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
10
0
.
5
7
$
5,
0
2
8
.
5
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Pa
c
k
a
g
e
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
1
I
.
U
.
G
l
u
c
a
g
o
n
1
m
g
/
m
L
s
t
e
r
i
l
e
H
2
O
f
o
r
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
ND
C
5
5
3
9
0
-
0
0
4
-
0
1
13
5
In
s
t
a
-
G
l
u
c
o
s
e
50
e
a
$
$
3.
2
6
$
16
3
.
0
0
$
$
$
4.
8
3
$
24
1
.
5
0
$
3.
9
9
$
19
9
.
5
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
31
g
/
t
u
b
e
13
6
Ke
t
a
m
i
n
e
H
C
I
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
30
e
a
$
$
5.
5
5
$
16
6
.
5
0
$
$
$
11
.
1
3
$
33
3
.
9
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
50
0
m
g
/
m
L
,
1
0
v
i
a
l
/
b
x
ND
C
6
7
4
5
7
-
0
0
1
-
1
0
13
7
Li
d
o
c
a
i
n
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
70
e
a
$
$
2.
4
5
$
17
1
.
5
0
$
$
$
2.
3
3
$
16
3
.
1
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2%
,
1
0
0
m
g
/
5
m
L
,
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
ND
C
0
5
4
8
-
3
3
9
0
-
0
0
13
8
Ma
g
n
e
s
i
u
m
S
u
l
f
a
t
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
50
e
a
$
$
1.
1
5
$
57
.
5
0
$
$
$
1.
3
0
$
65
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1g
/
2
m
L
v
i
a
l
ND
C
0
5
1
7
-
2
6
0
2
-
2
5
13
9
Ma
r
k
1
A
n
t
i
d
o
t
e
K
i
t
20
e
a
$
$
39
.
0
0
$
78
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
23
.
6
4
$
47
2
.
8
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2
m
g
A
t
r
o
p
i
n
e
,
6
0
0
m
g
2
P
A
M
C
L
ND
C
1
1
7
0
4
-
1
0
1
-
0
1
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
8
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
14
0
Me
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
B
l
u
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
20
e
a
$
$
7.
4
4
$
14
8
.
8
0
$
$
$
6.
1
8
$
12
3
.
6
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1%
,
1
0
m
g
/
m
L
ND
C
6
1
7
0
3
-
4
0
2
-
3
2
14
1
Mi
d
a
z
o
l
a
m
H
C
I
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
10
b
x
$
$
12
.
8
1
$
12
8
.
1
0
$
$
$
15
6
.
4
2
$
1,
5
6
4
.
2
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5
m
g
/
5
m
L
,
1
0
v
i
a
l
/
b
x
ND
C
1
0
0
1
9
-
0
2
8
-
3
7
14
2
Mo
r
p
h
i
n
e
S
u
l
f
a
t
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
30
e
a
$
$
1.
2
6
$
37
.
8
0
$
$
$
1.
1
1
$
33
.
3
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
10
m
g
/
m
L
,
2
5
v
i
a
l
s
/
b
x
ND
C
1
0
0
1
9
-
1
7
8
-
4
4
14
3
Na
l
o
x
o
n
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
50
0
e
a
$
$
14
.
2
0
$
7,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
19
.
1
6
$
9,
5
8
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2
m
g
/
2
m
L
,
w
/
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
ND
C
0
5
4
8
-
3
3
6
9
-
0
0
14
4
Ni
t
r
o
S
u
b
l
i
n
g
u
a
l
T
a
b
l
e
t
s
70
b
l
t
$
$
9.
8
3
$
68
8
.
1
0
$
$
$
0.
4
6
$
32
.
2
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.
4
m
g
,
2
5
T
a
b
l
e
t
s
B
o
t
t
l
e
ND
C
5
4
8
6
8
-
1
5
0
8
-
1
14
5
Or
d
a
n
s
e
t
r
o
n
H
C
I
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
30
b
x
$
$
15
.
0
0
$
45
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
2.
2
5
$
67
.
5
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4
m
g
/
2
m
L
,
5
v
i
a
l
/
b
x
ND
C
0
4
0
9
-
4
7
5
5
-
0
3
14
6
So
d
i
u
m
B
i
c
a
r
b
o
n
a
t
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
60
e
a
$
$
5.
6
3
$
33
7
.
8
0
$
$
$
2.
7
9
$
16
7
.
4
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4.
2
%
,
5
m
e
g
/
1
0
m
L
,
w
/
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
ND
C
0
5
4
8
-
3
3
3
1
-
0
0
14
7
So
d
i
u
m
B
i
c
a
r
b
o
n
a
t
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
30
0
e
a
$
$
2.
8
8
$
86
4
.
0
0
$
$
$
2.
6
8
$
80
4
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8.
4
%
,
5
0
m
L
,
w
/
L
u
e
r
L
o
c
k
ND
C
0
5
4
8
-
3
3
5
2
-
0
0
14
8
Su
c
c
i
n
y
l
c
h
l
o
r
i
n
e
C
h
l
o
r
i
d
e
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
30
e
a
$
$
2.
3
5
$
70
.
5
0
$
$
$
1.
7
3
$
51
.
9
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
20
0
m
g
/
1
0
m
L
,
v
i
a
l
ND
C
0
4
0
9
-
6
6
2
9
-
0
2
14
9
Te
r
a
c
a
i
n
e
H
C
I
75
e
a
$
$
8.
5
0
$
63
7
.
5
0
$
$
$
7.
5
9
$
56
9
.
2
5
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Op
t
h
a
l
m
i
c
S
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
U
S
P
,
0
.
5
%
15
m
L
b
o
t
t
l
e
ND
C
2
4
2
0
8
-
9
2
0
-
6
4
15
0
Va
s
o
p
r
e
s
s
i
n
I
n
j
.
,
U
S
P
10
b
x
$
$
14
8
.
2
5
$
1,
4
8
2
.
5
0
$
$
$
59
.
0
0
$
59
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
20
U
n
i
t
s
/
m
L
,
2
5
v
i
a
l
/
b
x
ND
C
0
5
1
7
-
0
5
1
0
-
2
5
GR
O
U
P
3
G
R
A
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
$
26
,
8
4
9
.
9
0
$
$
28
,
6
3
3
.
7
5
$
5.
7
8
$
30
6
.
9
0
$
$
$
$
(I
t
e
m
s
1
1
6
-
1
5
0
)
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
D
I
S
C
O
U
N
T
O
F
F
L
I
S
T
P
R
I
C
E
F
O
R
I
T
E
M
S
S
I
M
I
L
A
R
T
O
,
B
U
T
N
O
T
L
I
S
T
E
D
I
N
T
H
I
S
G
R
O
U
P
:
0%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
GR
O
U
P
4
-
D
I
A
G
N
O
S
T
I
C
S
A
N
D
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
S
:
15
1
Bl
o
o
d
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
C
u
f
f
s
30
b
x
$
$
47
.
5
0
$
1,
4
2
5
.
0
0
$
74
.
0
0
$
2,
2
2
0
.
0
0
$
33
.
6
1
$
1,
0
0
8
.
3
0
$
$
$
72
.
8
5
$
2,
1
8
5
.
5
0
$
$
$
$
$
Do
u
b
l
e
T
u
b
e
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
C
h
i
l
d
S
i
z
e
ZC
C
4
4
1
2
L
-
1
0
/
b
x
(Z
e
f
o
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
15
2
Bl
o
o
d
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
C
u
f
f
s
40
b
x
$
$
64
.
5
0
$
2,
5
8
0
.
0
0
$
74
.
0
0
$
2,
9
6
0
.
0
0
$
33
.
6
1
$
1,
3
4
4
.
4
0
$
$
$
74
.
2
8
$
2,
9
7
1
.
2
0
$
$
$
$
$
Do
u
b
l
e
T
u
b
e
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
S
m
a
l
l
A
d
u
l
t
S
i
z
e
ZC
C
4
3
1
2
L
-
1
0
/
b
x
(Z
e
f
o
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
9
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
15
3
Bl
o
o
d
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
C
u
f
f
s
12
5
b
x
$
$
64
.
5
0
$
8,
0
6
2
.
5
0
$
74
.
0
0
$
9,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$
43
.
8
5
$
5,
4
8
1
.
2
5
$
$
$
75
.
6
2
$
9,
4
5
2
.
5
0
$
$
$
$
$
Do
u
b
l
e
T
u
b
e
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
A
d
u
l
t
S
i
z
e
ZC
C
4
2
1
2
L
-
1
0
/
b
x
(Z
e
f
o
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
15
4
Bl
o
o
d
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
C
u
f
f
s
11
5
b
x
$
$
64
.
5
0
$
7,
4
1
7
.
5
0
$
74
.
0
0
$
8,
5
1
0
.
0
0
$
55
.
3
7
$
6,
3
6
7
.
5
5
$
$
$
79
.
7
2
$
9,
1
6
7
.
8
0
$
$
$
$
$
Do
u
b
l
e
T
u
b
e
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
L
a
r
g
e
A
d
u
l
t
S
i
z
e
ZC
C
4
1
1
2
L
-
1
0
/
b
x
(Z
e
f
o
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
15
5
Bl
o
o
d
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
C
u
f
f
s
5b
x
$
$
85
.
6
0
$
42
8
.
0
0
$
15
8
.
5
3
$
79
2
.
6
5
$
79
.
8
3
$
39
9
.
1
5
$
$
$
91
.
2
6
$
45
6
.
3
0
$
$
$
$
$
Do
u
b
l
e
T
u
b
e
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
T
h
i
g
h
ZC
C
4
0
1
2
L
-
1
0
/
b
x
(Z
e
f
o
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
15
6
Bl
o
o
d
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
C
u
f
f
s
5b
x
$
$
20
.
6
0
$
10
3
.
0
0
$
74
.
0
0
$
37
0
.
0
0
$
80
.
9
1
$
40
4
.
5
5
$
$
$
34
.
0
4
$
17
0
.
2
0
$
$
$
$
$
Si
n
g
l
e
T
u
b
e
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
C
h
i
l
d
S
i
z
e
ZS
C
4
4
0
1
M
Q
F
-
1
0
/
b
x
(Z
e
f
o
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
15
7
Bl
o
o
d
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
C
u
f
f
s
20
b
x
$
$
23
.
1
0
$
46
2
.
0
0
$
74
.
0
0
$
1,
4
8
0
.
0
0
$
98
.
8
1
$
1,
9
7
6
.
2
0
$
$
$
35
.
3
7
$
70
7
.
4
0
$
$
$
$
$
Si
n
g
l
e
T
u
b
e
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
S
m
a
l
l
A
d
u
l
t
S
i
z
e
ZS
C
4
3
0
1
M
Q
F
-
1
0
/
b
x
(Z
e
f
o
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
15
8
Bl
o
o
d
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
C
u
f
f
s
20
b
x
$
$
31
.
6
0
$
63
2
.
0
0
$
74
.
0
0
$
1,
4
8
0
.
0
0
$
98
.
9
1
$
1,
9
7
8
.
2
0
$
$
$
36
.
8
1
$
73
6
.
2
0
$
$
$
$
$
Si
n
g
l
e
T
u
b
e
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
A
d
u
l
t
S
i
z
e
ZS
C
4
2
0
1
M
Q
F
-
1
0
/
b
x
(Z
e
f
o
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
15
9
Bl
o
o
d
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
C
u
f
f
s
20
b
x
$
$
36
.
1
0
$
72
2
.
0
0
$
74
.
0
0
$
1,
4
8
0
.
0
0
$
98
.
8
1
$
1,
9
7
6
.
2
0
$
$
$
40
.
8
1
$
81
6
.
2
0
$
$
$
$
$
Si
n
g
l
e
T
u
b
e
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
L
a
r
g
e
A
d
u
l
t
S
i
z
e
ZS
C
4
1
0
1
M
Q
F
-
1
0
/
b
x
(Z
e
f
o
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
16
0
Bl
o
o
d
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
C
u
f
f
s
10
b
x
$
$
69
.
9
0
$
69
9
.
0
0
$
87
.
5
0
$
87
5
.
0
0
$
13
4
.
8
1
$
1,
3
4
8
.
1
0
$
$
$
52
.
4
5
$
52
4
.
5
0
$
$
$
$
$
Si
n
g
l
e
T
u
b
e
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
T
h
i
g
h
ZS
C
4
0
0
1
M
Q
F
-
1
0
/
b
x
(Z
e
f
o
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
16
1
Bl
o
o
d
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
B
u
l
b
s
10
0
e
a
$
$
3.
1
2
$
31
2
.
0
0
$
3.
2
5
$
32
5
.
0
0
$
2.
9
8
$
29
8
.
0
0
$
1.
6
9
$
16
9
.
0
0
$
2.
8
8
$
28
8
.
0
0
$
$
$
3.
5
8
$
35
8
.
0
0
$
Wi
t
h
v
a
l
v
e
s
#
8
7
5
(A
D
C
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
16
2
Sp
h
y
g
m
o
m
a
n
o
m
e
t
e
r
G
a
u
g
e
s
60
0
e
a
$
$
7.
1
4
$
4,
2
8
4
.
0
0
$
10
.
9
7
$
6,
5
8
2
.
0
0
$
7.
1
9
$
4,
3
1
4
.
0
0
$
3.
4
9
$
2,
0
9
4
.
0
0
$
7.
0
5
$
4,
2
3
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
4.
6
8
$
2,
8
0
8
.
0
0
$
(A
D
C
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
16
3
St
e
t
h
o
s
c
o
p
e
s
-
P
r
o
S
c
o
p
e
6
7
0
20
0
e
a
$
$
3.
7
5
$
75
0
.
0
0
$
4.
6
8
$
93
6
.
0
0
$
4.
4
8
$
89
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
4.
2
5
$
85
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
5.
8
2
$
1,
1
6
4
.
0
0
$
22
”
T
u
b
i
n
g
,
C
o
l
o
r
-
P
i
n
k
(
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
)
16
4
Pe
n
l
i
g
h
t
s
10
0
p
k
s
$
$
5.
0
2
$
50
2
.
0
0
$
4.
1
1
$
41
1
.
0
0
$
4.
6
4
$
46
4
.
0
0
$
3.
0
5
$
30
5
.
0
0
$
4.
2
1
$
42
1
.
0
0
$
$
$
4.
9
1
$
49
1
.
0
0
$
#5
9
8
0
5
,
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
,
6
p
e
r
p
a
c
k
(M
o
o
r
e
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
16
5
Mo
r
g
a
n
M
o
r
-
F
l
e
x
L
e
n
s
6b
x
$
$
23
3
.
6
4
$
1,
4
0
1
.
8
4
$
38
5
.
0
0
$
2,
3
1
0
.
0
0
$
22
2
.
4
9
$
1,
3
3
4
.
9
4
$
26
9
.
0
0
$
1,
6
1
4
.
0
0
$
24
5
.
0
5
$
1,
4
7
0
.
3
0
$
$
$
25
7
.
5
2
$
1,
5
4
5
.
1
2
$
MT
2
0
0
0
,
1
2
p
e
r
b
x
(M
o
r
t
r
a
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
10
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
16
6
El
e
c
t
r
o
d
e
s
7c
s
$
$
16
8
.
0
0
$
1,
1
7
6
.
0
0
$
11
1
.
6
0
$
78
1
.
2
0
$
95
.
5
2
$
66
8
.
6
4
$
$
$
96
.
5
9
$
67
6
.
1
3
$
$
$
16
6
.
0
0
$
1,
1
6
2
.
0
0
$
Pe
d
i
a
t
r
i
c
,
3
p
e
r
p
k
g
20
0
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
s
p
e
r
c
s
(K
E
N
D
A
L
L
3
1
4
3
9
7
6
6
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
)
16
7
El
e
c
t
r
o
d
e
s
20
0
c
s
$
$
19
6
.
2
0
$
39
,
2
4
0
.
0
0
$
24
0
.
0
0
$
48
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
11
4
.
6
2
$
22
,
9
2
4
.
0
0
$
$
$
94
.
7
7
$
18
,
9
5
4
.
0
0
$
$
$
18
7
.
5
0
$
37
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
Po
s
t
r
a
c
e
D
i
a
p
h
o
r
e
t
i
c
Ad
u
l
t
,
4
0
p
e
r
b
x
,
3
0
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
18
7
0
C
-
0
0
4
(C
o
n
M
e
d
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
d
e
)
16
8
Pr
e
p
R
a
z
o
r
s
40
b
x
$
$
16
.
5
0
$
66
0
.
0
0
$
6.
3
5
$
25
4
.
0
0
$
18
.
5
5
$
74
2
.
0
0
$
11
.
9
9
$
47
9
.
6
0
$
17
.
0
1
$
68
0
.
4
0
$
$
$
17
.
3
1
$
69
2
.
4
0
$
#4
2
5
1
,
5
0
p
e
r
b
x
(N
i
k
o
m
e
d
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
16
9
Ma
g
i
l
l
F
o
r
c
e
p
s
24
e
a
$
$
9.
0
1
$
21
6
.
2
4
$
4.
6
0
$
11
0
.
4
0
$
3.
0
9
$
74
.
1
6
$
2.
5
5
$
61
.
2
0
$
4.
7
7
$
11
4
.
4
8
$
$
$
2.
9
9
$
71
.
7
6
$
#8
2
7
6
0
,
1
1
”
A
d
u
l
t
S
t
a
i
n
l
e
s
s
S
t
e
e
l
17
0
Ma
g
i
l
l
F
o
r
c
e
p
s
12
e
a
$
$
9.
0
0
$
10
8
.
0
0
$
4.
6
0
$
55
.
2
0
$
3.
4
4
$
41
.
2
8
$
2.
3
9
$
28
.
6
8
$
4.
7
7
$
57
.
2
4
$
$
$
2.
9
9
$
35
.
8
8
$
#8
2
7
5
0
,
8
”
C
h
i
l
d
S
t
a
i
n
l
e
s
s
S
t
e
e
l
(E
M
P
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
17
1
Ke
l
l
y
F
o
r
c
e
p
s
24
e
a
$
$
1.
4
1
$
33
.
8
4
$
1.
3
2
$
31
.
6
8
$
1.
0
7
$
25
.
6
8
$
0.
8
9
$
21
.
3
6
$
1.
8
2
$
43
.
6
8
$
$
$
0.
9
9
$
23
.
7
6
$
He
m
o
s
t
a
t
s
#
7
2
4
0
0
0
St
r
a
i
g
h
t
5
-
1
/
2
”
S
t
a
i
n
l
e
s
s
S
t
e
e
l
(E
M
P
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
17
2
Ri
n
g
C
u
t
t
e
r
20
e
a
$
$
5.
0
2
$
10
0
.
4
0
$
5.
7
5
$
11
5
.
0
0
$
5.
6
3
$
11
2
.
6
0
$
3.
1
9
$
63
.
8
0
$
11
.
5
5
$
23
1
.
0
0
$
$
$
3.
5
1
$
70
.
2
0
$
#8
2
2
0
,
S
t
a
i
n
l
e
s
s
S
t
e
e
l
(E
M
P
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
17
3
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
B
l
a
d
e
20
e
a
$
$
1.
2
6
$
25
.
2
0
$
1.
4
7
$
29
.
4
0
$
1.
2
2
$
24
.
4
0
$
0.
7
9
$
15
.
8
0
$
4.
4
6
$
89
.
2
0
$
$
$
1.
9
9
$
39
.
8
0
$
fo
r
#
8
2
2
1
R
i
n
g
C
u
t
t
e
r
(E
M
P
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
17
4
Tr
a
u
m
a
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
S
h
e
e
r
s
28
0
e
a
$
0.
8
5
$
23
8
.
0
0
$
0.
8
7
$
24
3
.
6
0
$
0.
8
9
$
24
9
.
2
0
$
0.
6
7
$
18
7
.
6
0
$
1.
1
4
$
31
9
.
2
0
$
$
$
0.
7
7
$
21
5
.
6
0
$
#1
3
9
,
7
.
2
5
”
B
l
a
c
k
(E
M
P
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
GR
O
U
P
4
G
R
A
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
$
71
,
5
7
8
.
5
2
$
1,
6
2
2
.
6
0
$
89
,
6
0
2
.
1
3
$
54
,
4
5
2
.
8
0
$
29
9
.
7
0
$
5,
0
4
0
.
0
4
$
1,
0
9
3
.
5
3
$
55
,
6
1
2
.
4
3
$
$
46
,
1
7
7
.
5
2
$
(I
t
e
m
s
1
5
1
-
1
7
4
)
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
D
I
S
C
O
U
N
T
O
F
F
L
I
S
T
P
R
I
C
E
F
O
R
I
T
E
M
S
S
I
M
I
L
A
R
T
O
,
B
U
T
N
O
T
L
I
S
T
E
D
I
N
T
H
I
S
G
R
O
U
P
:
0%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
GR
O
U
P
5
-
S
P
L
I
N
T
S
,
I
M
M
O
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
A
N
D
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
:
17
5
Am
b
u
P
e
r
f
i
t
A
c
e
E
x
t
r
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
42
c
s
$
$
12
0
.
0
0
$
5,
0
4
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
12
9
.
6
1
$
5,
4
4
3
.
6
2
$
$
$
16
2
.
9
2
$
6,
8
4
2
.
6
4
$
$
$
17
8
.
9
5
$
7,
5
1
5
.
9
0
$
Co
l
l
a
r
,
3
0
P
E
R
c
s
(A
M
B
U
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
)
17
6
Am
b
u
M
i
n
i
A
c
e
9c
s
$
$
12
0
.
0
0
$
1,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
12
9
.
6
1
$
1,
1
6
6
.
4
9
$
$
$
16
2
.
9
2
$
1,
4
6
6
.
2
8
$
$
$
19
8
.
3
0
$
1,
7
8
4
.
7
0
$
Ad
j
u
s
t
a
b
l
e
C
o
l
l
a
r
,
3
0
p
e
r
c
s
In
f
a
n
t
,
P
e
d
i
a
t
r
i
c
a
n
d
G
e
r
i
a
t
r
i
c
S
e
t
t
i
n
g
s
(A
M
B
U
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
d
e
)
17
7
Di
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
R
e
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
S
t
r
a
p
s
78
8
e
a
$
$
2.
0
4
$
1,
6
0
7
.
5
2
$
$
$
2.
1
4
$
1,
6
8
6
.
3
2
$
1.
5
9
$
1,
2
5
2
.
9
2
$
2.
2
1
$
1,
7
4
1
.
4
8
$
$
$
1.
4
8
$
1,
1
6
6
.
2
4
$
5’
-
O
r
a
n
g
e
&
B
l
u
e
Tw
o
-
p
i
e
c
e
R
e
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
w
i
t
h
L
o
o
p
-
L
o
k
#4
5
4
3
9
0
(D
i
x
i
e
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
11
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
17
8
In
f
a
n
t
/
P
e
d
i
a
t
r
i
c
I
m
m
o
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
2e
a
$
$
26
7
.
0
4
$
53
4
.
0
8
$
$
$
26
0
.
8
7
$
52
1
.
7
4
$
$
$
39
8
.
0
7
$
79
6
.
1
4
$
$
$
18
4
.
0
0
$
36
8
.
0
0
$
Bo
a
r
d
w
i
t
h
C
a
r
r
y
i
n
g
c
s
#
D
6
3
6
8
(L
S
P
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
17
9
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
H
e
a
d
H
a
r
n
e
s
s
f
o
r
4e
a
$
$
58
.
2
1
$
23
2
.
8
4
$
$
$
67
.
5
8
$
27
0
.
3
2
$
$
$
81
.
6
7
$
32
6
.
6
8
$
$
$
11
.
6
0
$
46
.
4
0
$
In
f
a
n
t
/
P
e
d
i
a
t
r
i
c
I
m
m
o
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
B
o
a
r
d
18
0
K.
E
.
D
.
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
K
i
t
#
1
2
5
3e
a
$
$
72
.
6
5
$
21
7
.
9
5
$
$
$
76
.
6
9
$
23
0
.
0
7
$
$
$
97
.
2
7
$
29
1
.
8
1
$
$
$
87
.
7
2
$
26
3
.
1
6
$
Ke
n
d
r
i
c
k
E
x
t
r
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
v
i
c
e
(F
E
R
N
O
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
)
18
1
Tr
a
c
t
i
o
n
S
p
l
i
n
t
2e
a
$
$
30
8
.
1
4
$
61
6
.
2
8
$
$
$
29
7
.
7
8
$
59
5
.
5
6
$
$
$
49
5
.
0
0
$
99
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
29
9
.
4
2
$
59
8
.
8
4
$
Sa
g
e
r
f
o
r
m
II
I
b
i
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
,
M
o
d
e
l
S
3
0
4
(S
A
G
E
R
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
)
18
2
Tr
a
c
t
i
o
n
S
p
l
i
n
t
2e
a
$
$
26
2
.
3
5
$
52
4
.
7
0
$
$
$
25
0
.
5
9
$
50
1
.
1
8
$
$
$
41
4
.
5
0
$
82
9
.
0
0
$
$
$
26
0
.
8
2
$
52
1
.
6
4
$
Sa
g
e
r
P
e
d
i
a
t
r
i
c
,
M
o
d
e
l
S
3
0
0
(S
A
G
E
R
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
)
18
3
Sc
o
o
p
S
t
r
e
t
c
h
e
r
2e
a
$
$
62
9
.
8
0
$
1,
2
5
9
.
6
0
$
$
$
64
4
.
2
0
$
1,
2
8
8
.
4
0
$
$
$
70
8
.
1
9
$
1,
4
1
6
.
3
8
$
$
$
64
5
.
9
6
$
1,
2
9
1
.
9
2
$
Co
m
b
i
c
a
r
r
i
e
r
I
I
CC
2
2
0
0
P
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
18
4
Di
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
P
o
s
e
y
R
e
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
s
10
0
p
r
$
$
3.
2
9
$
32
9
.
0
0
$
$
$
6.
3
1
$
63
1
.
0
0
$
$
$
3.
5
6
$
35
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
3.
0
6
$
30
6
.
0
0
$
Li
m
b
H
o
l
d
e
r
#2
5
1
0
,
P
r
i
c
e
p
e
r
p
a
i
r
-
P
o
s
e
y
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
18
5
Ac
r
y
l
i
c
C
o
t
B
l
a
n
k
e
t
s
60
e
a
$
$
7.
7
8
$
46
6
.
8
0
$
$
$
10
.
4
0
$
62
4
.
0
0
$
$
$
8.
1
2
$
48
7
.
2
0
$
$
$
4.
5
6
$
27
3
.
6
0
$
#7
7
4
4
,
6
0
”
W
x
8
4
”
L
,
B
l
u
e
(C
h
a
t
h
a
m
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
18
6
Di
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
B
l
a
n
k
e
t
15
c
s
$
$
62
.
1
5
$
93
2
.
2
5
$
$
$
70
.
3
3
$
1,
0
5
4
.
9
5
$
59
.
7
5
$
89
6
.
2
5
$
38
.
6
4
$
57
9
.
6
0
$
$
$
44
.
1
6
$
66
2
.
4
0
$
#5
4
8
0
,
5
6
”
x
9
0
”
24
p
e
r
c
s
(B
a
n
t
a
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
18
7
Pi
l
l
o
w
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
I
M
2
0
2
5
18
c
s
$
$
46
.
3
2
$
83
3
.
7
6
$
$
$
62
.
1
7
$
1,
1
1
9
.
0
6
$
39
.
6
0
$
71
2
.
8
0
$
54
.
0
0
$
97
2
.
0
0
$
$
$
84
.
0
0
$
1,
5
1
2
.
0
0
$
#I
M
2
0
2
5
,
1
7
”
x
2
3
”
24
p
e
r
c
s
(P
u
t
n
a
m
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
18
8
Tw
o
P
i
e
c
e
C
o
t
S
t
r
a
p
s
24
e
a
$
$
17
.
2
9
$
41
4
.
9
6
$
$
$
15
.
7
4
$
37
7
.
7
6
$
$
$
19
.
0
0
$
45
6
.
0
0
$
$
$
6.
9
4
$
16
6
.
5
6
$
#4
3
0
,
M
a
r
o
o
n
-
F
e
r
n
o
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
18
9
Ec
o
n
o
-
V
a
c
S
p
l
i
n
t
5s
t
$
$
13
2
.
0
8
$
66
0
.
4
0
$
$
$
12
6
.
1
6
$
63
0
.
8
0
$
$
$
13
6
.
0
4
$
68
0
.
2
0
$
$
$
16
3
.
7
4
$
81
8
.
7
0
$
De
l
u
x
e
5
S
p
l
i
n
t
K
i
t
ME
D
I
C
A
L
D
E
V
I
C
E
S
I
N
T
’
L
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
19
0
Ec
o
n
o
-
V
a
c
S
p
l
i
n
t
24
e
a
$
$
15
.
7
5
$
37
8
.
0
0
$
$
$
15
.
0
5
$
36
1
.
2
0
$
$
$
16
.
2
2
$
38
9
.
2
8
$
$
$
20
.
1
2
$
48
2
.
8
8
$
#8
2
-
E
2
0
1
0
19
1
Ec
o
n
o
-
V
a
c
S
p
l
i
n
t
24
e
a
$
$
16
.
9
6
$
40
7
.
0
4
$
$
$
16
.
2
1
$
38
9
.
0
4
$
$
$
17
.
4
7
$
41
9
.
2
8
$
$
$
21
.
6
4
$
51
9
.
3
6
$
#8
2
-
E
2
0
1
4
19
2
Ec
o
n
o
-
V
a
c
S
p
l
i
n
t
24
e
a
$
$
7.
2
7
$
17
4
.
4
8
$
$
$
6.
9
5
$
16
6
.
8
0
$
$
$
7.
4
8
$
17
9
.
5
2
$
$
$
8.
3
2
$
19
9
.
6
8
$
#8
2
-
E
2
2
2
2
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
12
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
19
3
St
a
-
B
l
o
k
H
e
a
d
I
m
m
o
b
i
l
i
z
e
r
75
c
s
$
$
11
6
.
4
0
$
8,
7
3
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
11
2
.
8
1
$
8,
4
6
0
.
7
5
$
$
$
13
0
.
4
9
$
9,
7
8
6
.
7
5
$
$
$
15
2
.
4
0
$
11
,
4
3
0
.
0
0
$
La
d
e
r
a
l
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
GR
O
U
P
5
G
R
A
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
$
24
,
4
3
9
.
6
6
$
$
25
,
5
1
9
.
0
6
$
2,
8
6
1
.
9
7
$
2,
9
5
3
.
7
7
$
29
,
0
0
6
.
2
4
$
$
29
,
9
2
7
.
9
8
$
(I
t
e
m
s
1
7
5
-
1
9
3
)
10
0
.
9
4
$
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
D
I
S
C
O
U
N
T
O
F
F
L
I
S
T
P
R
I
C
E
F
O
R
I
T
E
M
S
S
I
M
I
L
A
R
T
O
,
B
U
T
N
O
T
L
I
S
T
E
D
I
N
T
H
I
S
G
R
O
U
P
:
0%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
GR
O
U
P
6
-
B
A
N
D
A
G
E
S
A
N
D
D
R
E
S
S
I
N
G
T
A
P
E
:
19
4
De
r
m
i
c
e
l
H
y
p
o
-
A
l
l
e
r
g
e
n
i
c
8c
s
$
$
96
.
4
8
$
77
1
.
8
4
$
99
.
8
1
$
79
8
.
4
8
$
92
.
7
7
$
74
2
.
1
6
$
81
.
9
0
$
65
5
.
2
0
$
98
.
7
9
$
79
0
.
3
2
$
$
$
92
.
4
0
$
73
9
.
2
0
$
Cl
o
t
h
T
a
p
e
1
”
,
#
5
1
4
4
12
r
o
l
l
s
p
e
r
b
x
,
1
2
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
(J
&
J
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
19
5
De
r
m
i
c
e
l
H
y
p
o
-
A
l
l
e
r
g
e
n
i
c
11
c
s
$
$
96
.
4
8
$
1,
0
6
1
.
2
8
$
99
.
8
1
$
1,
0
9
7
.
9
1
$
30
.
9
3
$
34
0
.
2
3
$
81
.
9
0
$
90
0
.
9
0
$
98
.
7
9
$
1,
0
8
6
.
6
9
$
$
$
92
.
4
0
$
1,
0
1
6
.
4
0
$
Cl
o
t
h
T
a
p
e
1
”
,
#
5
1
4
6
4
r
o
l
l
s
p
e
r
b
x
,
1
2
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
(J
&
J
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
19
6
Ba
n
d
A
i
d
s
¾
”
x
3
”
23
c
s
$
$
19
.
8
0
$
45
5
.
4
0
$
26
.
6
5
$
61
2
.
9
5
$
51
.
8
5
$
1,
1
9
2
.
5
5
$
22
.
8
0
$
52
4
.
4
0
$
36
.
7
3
$
84
4
.
7
9
$
$
$
15
.
6
0
$
35
8
.
8
0
$
#4
6
3
4
15
0
p
e
r
b
x
,
1
2
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
(J
&
J
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
19
7
Tr
i
a
n
g
u
l
a
r
B
a
n
d
a
g
e
s
18
c
s
$
$
50
.
4
0
$
90
7
.
2
0
$
64
.
4
0
$
1,
1
5
9
.
2
0
$
50
.
4
1
$
90
7
.
3
8
$
66
.
9
0
$
1,
2
0
4
.
2
0
$
75
.
2
9
$
1,
3
5
5
.
2
2
$
$
$
78
.
2
0
$
1,
4
0
7
.
6
0
$
#1
1
2
0
2
,
N
o
n
-
S
t
e
r
i
l
e
,
3
6
”
x
3
6
”
x
5
1
”
12
p
e
r
b
x
,
2
4
0
p
e
r
c
s
(D
y
n
a
r
e
x
,
J
&
J
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
19
8
Ad
a
p
t
i
c
B
a
n
d
a
g
e
s
26
b
x
$
$
32
.
9
4
$
85
6
.
4
4
$
21
.
9
5
$
57
0
.
7
0
$
23
.
6
1
$
61
3
.
8
6
$
39
.
5
9
$
1,
0
2
9
.
3
4
$
24
.
7
0
$
64
2
.
2
0
$
$
$
29
.
2
4
$
76
0
.
2
4
$
#2
0
1
2
,
3
”
x
3
”
50
p
e
r
b
x
(J
&
J
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
19
9
Co
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
d
s
14
c
s
$
$
45
.
0
5
$
63
0
.
7
0
$
47
.
2
4
$
66
1
.
3
6
$
42
.
5
7
$
59
5
.
9
8
$
39
.
9
0
$
55
8
.
6
0
$
37
.
2
7
$
52
1
.
7
8
$
$
$
45
.
2
0
$
63
2
.
8
0
$
#2
3
1
4
5
,
5
”
x
9
”
25
p
e
r
b
x
,
1
6
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
40
0
p
e
r
c
s
(J
&
J
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
20
0
2”
S
t
e
r
i
l
e
K
l
i
n
g
18
c
s
$
$
18
.
8
0
$
33
8
.
4
0
$
13
8
.
3
7
$
2,
4
9
0
.
6
6
$
9.
8
5
$
17
7
.
3
0
$
19
.
1
5
$
34
4
.
7
0
$
18
.
1
8
$
32
7
.
2
4
$
$
$
19
.
7
6
$
35
5
.
6
8
$
#6
9
2
2
12
p
e
r
b
x
,
8
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
(J
&
J
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
20
1
Tr
a
u
m
a
D
r
e
s
s
i
n
g
17
c
s
$
$
50
.
0
0
$
85
0
.
0
0
$
52
.
5
0
$
89
2
.
5
0
$
11
4
.
5
1
$
1,
9
4
6
.
6
7
$
41
.
5
0
$
70
5
.
5
0
$
45
.
4
4
$
77
2
.
4
8
$
$
$
47
.
0
0
$
79
9
.
0
0
$
#1
1
6
8
4
,
1
0
”
x
3
0
”
50
p
e
r
c
s
(M
o
o
r
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
20
2
St
e
r
i
l
e
4
”
K
l
i
n
g
22
c
s
$
$
17
.
5
8
$
38
6
.
7
6
$
13
8
.
3
7
$
3,
0
4
4
.
1
4
$
5.
6
5
$
12
4
.
3
0
$
20
.
0
0
$
44
0
.
0
0
$
17
.
9
4
$
39
4
.
6
8
$
$
$
24
.
8
8
$
54
7
.
3
6
$
#6
9
2
4
12
p
e
r
b
x
,
6
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
(J
&
J
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
20
3
St
e
r
i
l
e
4
”
x
4
”
1
2
-
P
l
y
#
3
3
4
2
8c
s
$
$
40
.
5
6
$
32
4
.
4
8
$
48
.
7
2
$
38
9
.
7
6
$
39
.
3
7
$
31
4
.
9
6
$
43
.
9
0
$
35
1
.
2
0
$
29
.
8
0
$
23
8
.
4
0
$
$
$
36
.
4
8
$
29
1
.
8
4
$
#3
3
4
2
,
2
5
e
n
v
e
l
o
p
e
s
o
f
2
b
x
24
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
,
1
,
2
0
0
s
p
o
n
g
e
s
p
e
r
c
s
(D
y
n
a
r
e
x
,
J
&
J
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
13
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
20
4
As
h
e
r
m
a
n
C
h
e
s
t
S
e
a
l
3b
x
$
$
31
5
.
5
0
$
94
6
.
5
0
$
97
.
7
5
$
29
3
.
2
5
$
94
.
0
1
$
28
2
.
0
3
$
90
.
0
0
$
27
0
.
0
0
$
95
.
5
2
$
28
6
.
5
6
$
$
$
91
.
2
0
$
27
3
.
6
0
$
10
p
e
r
b
x
R
u
s
c
h
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
20
5
Co
b
a
n
S
e
l
f
-
A
d
h
e
r
e
n
t
W
r
a
p
2
”
20
b
x
$
$
59
.
0
4
$
1,
1
8
0
.
8
0
$
55
.
4
4
$
1,
1
0
8
.
8
0
$
30
.
3
4
$
60
6
.
8
0
$
27
.
0
0
$
54
0
.
0
0
$
23
.
8
2
$
47
6
.
4
0
$
$
$
23
.
6
8
$
47
3
.
6
0
$
#1
5
8
2
,
3
6
p
e
r
b
x
(3
M
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
20
6
Ec
o
n
o
m
y
C
o
l
d
p
k
s
6
”
x
8
”
90
c
s
$
$
5.
9
6
$
53
6
.
4
0
$
6.
0
0
$
54
0
.
0
0
$
6.
4
1
$
57
6
.
9
0
$
11
.
5
0
$
1,
0
3
5
.
0
0
$
12
.
0
0
$
1,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
9.
9
5
$
89
5
.
5
0
$
#2
1
1
2
4
,
2
4
p
e
r
c
s
(G
A
M
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
20
7
St
e
r
i
l
e
B
u
r
n
S
h
e
e
t
6
0
”
x
9
0
”
11
c
s
$
$
36
.
9
6
$
40
6
.
5
6
$
34
.
2
0
$
37
6
.
2
0
$
37
.
4
5
$
41
1
.
9
5
$
38
.
1
6
$
41
9
.
7
6
$
31
.
8
1
$
34
9
.
9
1
$
$
$
21
.
7
2
$
23
8
.
9
2
$
#7
0
1
0
,
1
2
p
e
r
c
s
(G
A
M
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
20
8
O.
B
.
K
i
t
,
S
o
f
t
P
a
c
k
12
0
e
a
$
$
5.
6
2
$
67
4
.
4
0
$
6.
1
5
$
73
8
.
0
0
$
6.
2
4
$
74
8
.
8
0
$
4.
3
9
$
52
6
.
8
0
$
12
.
1
1
$
1,
4
5
3
.
2
0
$
$
$
3.
8
9
$
46
6
.
8
0
$
#2
0
3
0
(E
M
P
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
20
9
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
I
t
e
m
-
S
e
e
#
2
0
8
12
0
e
a
$
$
5.
6
2
$
67
4
.
4
0
$
$
$
6.
2
4
$
74
8
.
8
0
$
4.
3
9
$
52
6
.
8
0
$
12
.
1
1
$
1,
4
5
3
.
2
0
$
$
$
3.
8
9
$
46
6
.
8
0
$
(E
M
P
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
21
0
Sa
f
e
t
y
S
c
a
l
p
e
l
,
S
i
z
e
1
1
4b
x
$
$
21
.
1
0
$
84
.
4
0
$
4.
2
7
$
17
.
0
8
$
3.
6
2
$
14
.
4
8
$
7.
1
5
$
28
.
6
0
$
6.
8
8
$
27
.
5
2
$
$
$
4.
1
9
$
16
.
7
6
$
#1
6
1
1
,
1
0
p
e
r
b
x
(D
y
n
a
r
e
x
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
21
1
Ba
b
y
B
e
a
n
n
i
e
30
e
a
$
$
0.
6
3
$
18
.
9
0
$
1.
2
9
$
38
.
7
0
$
1.
6
1
$
48
.
3
0
$
0.
7
5
$
22
.
5
0
$
1.
8
1
$
54
.
3
0
$
$
$
0.
8
8
$
26
.
4
0
$
#3
2
-
2
0
0
Kn
i
t
t
e
d
P
o
l
y
e
s
t
e
r
S
t
o
c
k
i
n
e
t
t
e
(E
M
P
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
21
2
Ba
b
y
B
u
n
t
i
n
g
30
e
a
$
$
2.
7
7
$
83
.
1
0
$
6.
6
5
$
19
9
.
5
0
$
3.
1
6
$
94
.
8
0
$
1.
8
9
$
56
.
7
0
$
4.
3
1
$
12
9
.
3
0
$
$
$
2.
6
4
$
79
.
2
0
$
#1
1
2
,
Is
o
t
h
e
r
m
a
l
F
o
i
l
B
l
a
n
k
e
t
S
t
e
r
i
l
e
(G
A
M
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
21
3
Hy
d
r
o
g
e
n
P
e
r
o
x
i
d
e
3
%
58
c
s
$
$
10
.
9
2
$
63
3
.
3
6
$
9.
9
6
$
57
7
.
6
8
$
7.
6
9
$
44
6
.
0
2
$
12
.
9
0
$
74
8
.
2
0
$
7.
4
6
$
43
2
.
6
8
$
$
$
0.
8
9
$
51
.
6
2
$
#9
8
0
0
1
16
o
z
.
b
t
l
,
1
2
b
t
l
p
e
r
c
s
(M
e
d
l
i
n
e
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
21
4
Sp
o
n
g
e
s
,
4
”
x
4
”
22
c
s
$
$
51
.
0
0
$
1,
1
2
2
.
0
0
$
66
.
5
0
$
1,
4
6
3
.
0
0
$
56
.
8
1
$
1,
2
4
9
.
8
2
$
47
.
1
9
$
1,
0
3
8
.
1
8
$
45
.
8
5
$
1,
0
0
8
.
7
0
$
$
$
51
.
4
0
$
1,
1
3
0
.
8
0
$
No
n
-
S
t
e
r
i
l
e
8
-
P
l
y
#
1
7
9
2
20
0
p
e
r
p
k
g
.
,
4
,
0
0
0
s
p
o
n
g
e
s
p
e
r
c
s
(K
e
n
d
a
l
l
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
21
5
Sp
o
n
g
e
s
,
4
”
x
4
”
18
c
s
$
$
40
.
5
6
$
73
0
.
0
8
$
48
.
7
2
$
87
6
.
9
6
$
53
.
2
9
$
95
9
.
2
2
$
43
.
9
0
$
79
0
.
2
0
$
29
.
8
0
$
53
6
.
4
0
$
$
$
36
.
4
8
$
65
6
.
6
4
$
St
e
r
i
l
e
1
2
-
P
l
y
#3
3
4
2
,
2
5
e
n
v
e
l
o
p
e
s
o
f
2
b
x
24
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
1,
2
0
0
s
p
o
n
g
e
s
p
e
r
c
s
(D
y
n
a
r
e
x
,
J
&
J
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
21
6
Su
d
e
c
o
n
I
r
r
i
t
a
n
t
S
p
r
a
y
10
0
p
r
$
$
1.
6
0
$
16
0
.
0
0
$
1.
9
9
$
19
9
.
0
0
$
1.
8
0
$
18
0
.
0
0
$
2.
0
0
$
20
0
.
0
0
$
1.
9
1
$
19
1
.
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
De
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
W
i
p
e
s
Su
d
e
c
o
n
T
o
w
e
l
e
t
t
e
s
,
#
F
L
9
1
1
(F
o
x
L
a
b
s
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
14
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
21
7
No
r
m
a
l
S
a
l
i
n
e
16
c
s
$
$
12
.
4
8
$
19
9
.
6
8
$
28
.
3
3
$
45
3
.
2
8
$
20
.
0
5
$
32
0
.
8
0
$
34
.
1
9
$
54
7
.
0
4
$
18
.
8
8
$
30
2
.
0
8
$
$
$
$
$
1,
0
0
0
m
L
P
l
a
s
t
i
c
b
t
l
#2
F
7
1
1
4
,
1
2
p
e
r
c
s
(B
a
x
t
e
r
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
21
8
Na
i
l
P
o
l
i
s
h
R
e
m
o
v
e
r
P
a
d
s
4b
x
$
$
2.
8
6
$
11
.
4
4
$
3.
5
9
$
14
.
3
6
$
2.
9
6
$
11
.
8
4
$
3.
1
9
$
12
.
7
6
$
3.
8
8
$
15
.
5
2
$
$
$
3.
0
9
$
12
.
3
6
$
#7
1
2
0
0
,
1
0
0
p
e
r
b
x
(P
D
I
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
GR
O
U
P
6
G
R
A
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
$
14
,
0
4
4
.
5
2
$
18
,
6
1
3
.
4
7
$
13
,
6
5
5
.
9
5
$
13
,
4
7
6
.
5
8
$
14
,
7
7
0
.
5
7
$
$
11
,
6
9
7
.
9
2
$
(I
t
e
m
s
1
9
4
-
2
1
8
)
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
D
I
S
C
O
U
N
T
O
F
F
L
I
S
T
P
R
I
C
E
F
O
R
I
T
E
M
S
S
I
M
I
L
A
R
T
O
,
B
U
T
N
O
T
L
I
S
T
E
D
I
N
T
H
I
S
G
R
O
U
P
:
0%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
GR
O
U
P
7
-
I
N
F
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
:
21
9
Gl
o
v
e
s
,
N
i
t
r
i
l
e
M
i
c
r
o
F
l
e
x
6c
s
$
$
95
.
1
0
$
57
0
.
6
0
$
66
.
5
0
$
39
9
.
0
0
$
89
.
7
1
$
53
8
.
2
6
$
$
$
92
.
6
5
$
55
5
.
9
0
$7
5
.
0
0
$
$
10
9
.
5
6
$
65
7
.
3
6
$
Su
p
r
e
n
o
–
S
i
z
e
S
m
a
l
l
#
S
U
6
9
0
S
$7
.
5
0
p
e
r
b
x
10
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
-
M
i
c
r
o
F
l
e
x
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
22
0
Gl
o
v
e
s
,
N
i
t
r
i
l
e
M
i
c
r
o
F
l
e
x
11
c
s
$
$
95
.
1
0
$
1,
0
4
6
.
1
0
$
66
.
5
0
$
73
1
.
5
0
$
89
.
7
1
$
98
6
.
8
1
$
$
$
92
.
6
5
$
1,
0
1
9
.
1
5
$7
5
.
0
0
$
$
10
9
.
5
6
$
1,
2
0
5
.
1
6
$
Su
p
r
e
n
o
–
S
i
z
e
M
e
d
i
u
m
#
S
U
6
9
0
M
$7
.
5
0
p
e
r
b
x
10
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
-
M
i
c
r
o
F
l
e
x
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
22
1
Gl
o
v
e
s
,
N
i
t
r
i
l
e
M
i
c
r
o
F
l
e
x
13
c
s
$
$
95
.
1
0
$
1,
2
3
6
.
3
0
$
66
.
5
0
$
86
4
.
5
0
$
89
.
7
1
$
1,
1
6
6
.
2
3
$
$
$
92
.
6
5
$
1,
2
0
4
.
4
5
$7
5
.
0
0
$
$
10
9
.
5
6
$
1,
4
2
4
.
2
8
$
Su
p
r
e
n
o
–
S
i
z
e
L
a
r
g
e
#
S
U
6
9
0
L
$7
.
5
0
p
e
r
b
x
10
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
(M
I
C
R
O
F
L
E
X
-
N
o
S
u
b
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
)
22
2
Gl
o
v
e
s
,
N
i
t
r
i
l
e
M
i
c
r
o
F
l
e
x
17
c
s
$
$
95
.
1
0
$
1,
6
1
6
.
7
0
$
66
.
5
0
$
1,
1
3
0
.
5
0
$
89
.
7
1
$
1,
5
2
5
.
0
7
$
$
$
92
.
6
5
$
1,
5
7
5
.
0
5
$7
5
.
0
0
$
$
10
9
.
5
6
$
1,
8
6
2
.
5
2
$
Su
p
r
e
n
o
–
S
i
z
e
E
x
t
r
a
L
a
r
g
e
#
S
U
6
9
0
X
L
$7
.
5
0
p
e
r
b
x
10
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
-
M
i
c
r
o
F
l
e
x
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
22
3
Pe
r
s
o
n
a
l
A
n
t
i
m
i
c
r
o
b
i
a
l
W
i
p
e
53
b
x
$
$
4.
1
2
$
21
8
.
3
6
$
3.
7
5
$
19
8
.
7
5
$
3.
3
8
$
17
9
.
1
4
$
$
$
3.
7
7
$
19
9
.
8
1
$
$
$
3.
9
4
$
20
8
.
8
2
$
P.
A
.
W
.
S
.
#
3
4
4
0
0
10
0
e
a
p
e
r
b
x
(S
a
f
e
t
e
c
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
22
4
Al
c
a
r
e
P
l
u
s
H
a
n
d
F
o
a
m
#
6
3
9
9
31
2
e
a
$
$
9.
0
2
$
2,
8
1
4
.
2
4
$
1.
7
1
$
53
3
.
5
2
$
7.
1
7
$
2,
2
3
7
.
0
4
$
$
$
7.
6
0
$
2,
3
7
1
.
2
0
$
$
$
8.
9
7
$
2,
7
9
8
.
6
4
$
Ki
l
l
s
m
i
c
r
o
-
o
r
g
a
n
i
s
m
s
9
o
z
.
(Z
e
n
e
c
a
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
22
5
Bi
o
h
a
z
a
r
d
B
a
g
s
#
4
5
-
4
1
46
c
s
31
.
7
4
$
1,
4
6
0
.
0
4
$
42
.
5
0
$
1,
9
5
5
.
0
0
$
47
.
0
5
$
2,
1
6
4
.
3
0
$
66
.
1
0
$
3,
0
4
0
.
6
0
$
$
$
72
.
6
3
$
3,
3
4
0
.
9
8
$
$
$
80
.
8
4
$
3,
7
1
8
.
6
4
$
Re
d
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
-
2
5
0
p
e
r
c
a
s
e
31
”
x
4
1
”
,
3
3
g
a
l
l
o
n
s
i
z
e
(M
D
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
e
s
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
22
6
Bi
o
h
a
z
a
r
d
B
a
g
s
#
4
5
-
5
4
43
c
s
25
.
3
9
$
1,
0
9
1
.
7
7
$
13
7
.
5
0
$
5,
9
1
2
.
5
0
$
45
.
0
5
$
1,
9
3
7
.
1
5
$
51
.
9
1
$
2,
2
3
2
.
1
3
$
$
$
39
.
7
0
$
1,
7
0
7
.
1
0
$
$
$
54
.
8
9
$
2,
3
6
0
.
2
7
$
Re
d
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
24
”
x
2
4
”
,
1
6
g
a
l
l
o
n
s
i
z
e
50
p
e
r
b
x
,
5
b
x
p
e
r
c
s
,
25
0
p
e
r
c
s
(M
D
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
e
s
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
22
7
Sh
a
r
p
C
o
n
t
a
i
n
e
r
s
61
c
s
$
$
10
1
.
5
2
$
6,
1
9
2
.
7
2
$
12
8
.
1
6
$
7,
8
1
7
.
7
6
$
96
.
8
5
$
5,
9
0
7
.
8
5
$
$
$
10
4
.
0
9
$
6,
3
4
9
.
4
9
$
$
$
3.
4
0
$
20
7
.
4
0
$
Si
z
e
1
.
5
,
Q
u
a
r
t
R
e
d
#
3
0
5
4
8
7
36
p
e
r
c
s
-
B
e
c
t
o
n
D
i
c
k
i
n
s
o
n
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
15
Ci
t
y
o
f
D
e
l
r
a
y
B
e
a
c
h
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Bi
d
N
o
.
2
0
1
2
-
1
2
Me
d
i
c
a
l
/
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
l
l
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
o
l
y
B
o
u
n
d
T
r
e
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
G
u
a
r
d
i
a
n
M
e
d
.
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
H
e
n
r
y
S
c
h
e
i
n
E
M
S
K
e
n
t
r
o
n
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
M
i
d
w
e
s
t
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
H
&
S
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
L
L
C
Q
u
a
d
M
e
d
,
I
n
c
.
IT
E
M
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
E
S
T
/
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
i
t
P
r
i
c
e
Es
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
22
8
Sh
a
r
p
C
o
n
t
a
i
n
e
r
s
50
c
s
$
$
12
6
.
0
0
$
6,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$
15
6
.
9
6
$
7,
8
4
8
.
0
0
$
11
7
.
8
5
$
5,
8
9
2
.
5
0
$
$
$
12
6
.
4
3
$
6,
3
2
1
.
5
0
$
$
$
6.
6
8
$
33
4
.
0
0
$
Si
z
e
8
,
Q
u
a
r
t
R
e
d
w
/
c
l
e
a
r
t
o
p
#3
0
5
4
6
0
24
p
e
r
c
s
-
B
e
c
t
o
n
D
i
c
k
i
n
s
o
n
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
22
9
Te
c
h
n
o
l
P
F
R
9
5
4b
x
$
$
26
.
2
5
$
10
5
.
0
0
$
28
.
8
9
$
11
5
.
5
6
$
14
8
.
2
1
$
59
2
.
8
4
$
$
$
25
.
8
7
$
10
3
.
4
8
$
$
$
24
.
4
9
$
97
.
9
6
$
Tu
b
e
r
c
u
l
o
s
i
s
M
a
s
k
s
Si
z
e
S
m
a
l
l
,
#
4
6
8
2
7
35
p
e
r
b
x
-
K
i
m
b
e
r
l
y
C
l
a
r
k
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
23
0
Te
c
h
n
o
l
P
F
R
9
5
4b
x
$
$
26
.
2
5
$
10
5
.
0
0
$
28
.
8
9
$
11
5
.
5
6
$
14
8
.
2
1
$
59
2
.
8
4
$
$
$
25
.
8
7
$
10
3
.
4
8
$
$
$
25
.
7
2
$
10
2
.
8
8
$
Tu
b
e
r
c
u
l
o
s
i
s
M
a
s
k
s
Si
z
e
M
e
d
i
u
m
,
#
4
6
7
2
7
35
p
e
r
b
x
-
K
i
m
b
e
r
l
y
C
l
a
r
k
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
23
1
Mo
l
d
e
d
S
u
r
g
i
c
a
l
M
a
s
k
#
2
2
0
3
0
24
b
x
$
$
4.
4
1
$
10
5
.
8
4
$
4.
4
8
$
10
7
.
5
2
$
6.
4
7
$
15
5
.
2
8
$
$
$
4.
3
6
$
10
4
.
6
4
$
$
$
3.
2
7
$
78
.
4
8
$
Bl
u
e
,
O
n
e
S
i
z
e
F
i
t
s
A
l
l
50
p
e
r
b
x
(D
y
n
a
r
e
x
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
23
2
Sl
e
e
v
e
s
#
3
7
1
2
10
c
s
$
$
20
.
0
0
$
20
0
.
0
0
$
25
.
3
8
$
25
3
.
8
0
$
83
.
5
5
$
83
5
.
5
0
$
$
$
62
.
3
4
$
62
3
.
4
0
$
$
$
55
.
5
9
$
55
5
.
9
0
$
18
”
W
h
i
t
e
w
/
E
l
a
s
t
i
c
a
t
b
o
t
h
e
n
d
s
20
0
p
e
r
c
s
(P
o
s
i
-
W
e
a
r
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
23
3
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
v
e
E
y
e
w
e
a
r
20
0
e
a
$
$
2.
4
7
$
49
4
.
0
0
$
2.
0
5
$
41
0
.
0
0
$
2.
1
7
$
43
4
.
0
0
$
$
$
3.
5
5
$
71
0
.
0
0
$
$
$
4.
6
3
$
92
6
.
0
0
$
Hi
g
h
I
m
p
a
c
t
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Op
t
i
c
a
l
l
y
C
o
r
r
e
c
t
L
e
n
s
Wr
a
p
A
r
o
u
n
d
s
,
#
S
A
5
1
9
0
(M
D
S
M
a
t
r
x
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
23
4
Co
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
B
a
g
s
3c
s
$
$
20
8
.
8
0
$
62
6
.
4
0
$
96
.
0
0
$
28
8
.
0
0
$
28
3
.
2
1
$
84
9
.
6
3
$
$
$
25
4
.
7
7
$
76
4
.
3
1
$
$
$
0.
9
1
$
2.
7
3
$
On
e
S
i
z
e
,
o
n
e
-
w
a
y
P
l
a
s
t
i
c
(V
o
m
i
t
B
a
g
s
)
,
#
G
K
R
7
0
0
0
12
p
e
r
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
,
2
4
0
p
e
r
c
s
(G
K
R
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
23
5
Ch
u
x
A
b
s
o
r
b
e
n
t
C
o
m
p
a
c
t
6c
s
$
$
0.
0
9
$
0.
5
4
$
0.
1
9
$
1.
1
4
$
35
.
4
9
$
21
2
.
9
4
$
$
$
23
.
5
2
$
14
1
.
1
2
$
$
$
0.
1
7
$
1.
0
2
$
Un
d
e
r
p
a
d
s
,
1
2
”
x
1
7
”
-
C
o
n
m
e
d
ea
c
h
NO
S
U
B
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
S
23
6
Di
s
p
o
s
a
b
l
e
G
l
a
s
s
e
s
#
1
8
0
S
22
0
e
a
$
$
1.
0
5
$
23
1
.
0
0
$
1.
9
5
$
42
9
.
0
0
$
1.
8
5
$
40
7
.
0
0
$
$
$
1.
2
7
$
27
9
.
4
0
$
$
$
1.
5
2
$
33
4
.
4
0
$
Cl
e
a
r
P
o
l
y
c
a
r
b
o
n
a
t
e
L
e
n
s
e
s
#1
8
0
S
(A
D
E
N
B
A
M
1
8
0
S
)
23
7
Ca
v
i
c
i
d
e
2
4
o
z
.
s
p
r
a
y
b
o
t
t
l
e
36
e
a
$
$
7.
6
7
$
27
6
.
1
2
$
8.
0
6
$
29
0
.
1
6
$
6.
2
6
$
22
5
.
3
6
$
$
$
7.
3
0
$
26
2
.
8
0
$
$
$8
8
.
0
0
$3
,
16
8
.
0
0
$
#1
2
0
2
4
(M
e
t
r
e
x
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
e
q
u
a
l
)
GR
O
U
P
7
G
R
A
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
2,
5
5
1
.
8
1
$
30
,
0
0
6
.
4
2
$
25
,
6
3
5
.
7
2
$
28
,
0
1
1
.
0
2
$
$
27
,
7
3
7
.
2
6
$
$
20
,
0
4
4
.
4
6
$
(I
t
e
m
s
2
1
9
-
2
3
7
)
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
D
I
S
C
O
U
N
T
O
F
F
L
I
S
T
PR
I
C
E
F
O
R
I
T
E
M
S
S
I
M
I
L
A
R
T
O
,
B
U
T
NO
T
L
I
S
T
E
D
I
N
T
H
I
S
G
R
O
U
P
:
0%
1
8
.
0
%
1
0
.
0
%
1
5
.
6
%
0
.
0
%
1
2
.
0
%
0
.
0
%
1
5
.
0
%
Ta
b
S
h
e
e
t
0
2
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
16
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Paul Dorling, AICP, Director of Planning and Zoning
THROUGH:City Manager
DATE:March 29, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 9.A. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
APPEAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPEARANCE BOARD ACTION: DELRAY INN,
INC.
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
The action requested of the City Commission is consideration of an appeal of the Site Plan Review and
Appearance Board's (SPRAB) denial of a Class III site plan modification, and landscape plan for
Delray Inn, Inc. located at 297 N.E. 6th Ave nue. The Board approved the related architectural
elevations.
BACKGROUND
On February 22, 2012, the Site Plan Review and A ppearance Board (SPRAB) denied the Class III site
plan modification and landscape plan. On March 2, 2012, SPRAB’s action was appealed by the
applicant’s attorney, Jeffrey Lynne. The basis of the appeal is that the SPRAB Board denial of the site
plan and landscape plan was based upon the propos ed use as a Non-Residential Licensed Service
Provider as opposed to the failure to meet the tech nical requirements of the LDR’s. The relief being
sought is to uphold the appeal and approve the Class III site plan modification and Landscape Plan. The
appeal is being processed pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(E) Appeals.
REVIEW BY OTHERS
At its meeting of March 2, 2012, the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board (SPRAB) denied the
Class III site plan modification on a 4 to 2 vote (first vote was 3 to 3) and a 6 to 0 vote on the Landscape
Plan. The Board followed the established quasi-judicial procedures in considering the project. Members
of the public spoke in opposition citing concerns over l ack of security, the need for additional screening
and concerns over compatibility of the use. Board me mbers also discussed concerns over safety of both
residents of the facility and su rrounding neighbors as well as compatibility of the use with adjacent
residential uses. City staff and the applicant offered testimony, which supported the development
p roposal. After deliberation SPRAB denied the Class III site plan modification and the associated
landscape plan while approving th e architectural elevations.
RECOMMENDATION
City Commission discretion.
Agenda_Meeting[1].pdf
Agenda_Meeting[1].pdf
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Paul Dorling, AICP, Director of Planning and Zoning THROUGH: City Manager DATE: March 28, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 9.B. -REGULAR COMMISSION
MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST/DELRAY GAS STATION ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION The action before the City Commission is approval of a Conditional Use request to reestablish
a gasoline station use with food sales at 14111 South Military Trail pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(E). BACKGROUND The subject property is a one acre site which is located south of the
Public Self Storage Facility on the west side of Military Trail, south of Lake Ida Road. The property is bounded to the south by Tire Kingdom, to the north and west by the Public Self
Storage Facility and to the east (across Military Trail) by High Point of Delray East (Condo Development). The subject property contains a vacant Valero Gas Station, which was legally
established in 1983 and vacated in late 2009. Pursuant to 2.4.5(E)(6), if a conditional use is discontinued or abandoned for a continuous period of 180 days, the conditional use cannot
be reestablished without a new application being filed, reviewed and approved. The current property owner is actively marketing the property to potential end uses that would rehabilitate
the property and utilize it as a gasoline station with a convenience store. If the conditional use approval is granted, a site development plan consistent with the LDRs will be required.
It is noted this will require extensive improvements and upgrades to the landscaping, driveway connections and signage. REVIEW BY OTHERS The proposed Conditional Use request was considered
by the Planning and Zoning Board on March 19, 2012 at which time the Board recommended approval, subject to conditions, on a 7 to 0 vote. RECOMMENDATION By motion, approve the Conditional
Use request to reestablish a gasoline station with food sales, based upon positive findings with respect to Section 2.4.5(E)(5) (Conditional Use Findings) and Chapter 3 (Required Findings)
of the Land Development Regulations, and consistency with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions of approval: That a site development plan be processed
which shall include significant landscape improvements including those noted in the attached landscape technical comments (Appendix B) signage in compliance with LDR Section 4.6.7, and
driveway modifications as noted in the staff report.
9" @ ***"*** -G+7'84+8 -Z((-!*DV#F!!P! -![[[[((([[[[[(((G!!\6]D[[[[[[[[[(!%&![[[[[[[[[[(!%((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((+3+++G*)!*\!((((((((((((((((((((((((((+(4!!#F!#!D!!!JDN!^[[[[[[((D!!!JDN#$!
^[((((((Q !"*JNQ !!JNQ G!E*!#!JGN=!Q !"*JN>#F!(((((((((((((((((((ZD!)!##F![((((((((((((D!&#!=!!"!(((((((((((((((((((((((((!!*"!!"*"!>!X:=!G!!&!!"!((((((((((((((((((((((((!!*"!!!"!"!!!A#!*(
!!!!#%!!#!*#F!!P!!!!!&#!+3+++G*!8(3(KJN(A !$!!*!!!&!#!)!!E*!&!#!G*'%!##(!!*#!#!*!A#'!#&!*!)!!E*#!!JG*N*)!*J#!"!!N(!$!!*"Z!D'&&!*!!#*!(X+-+8+8"!#!!!87'+7X+*!#*!("!#!!>!&!"!!!*(!!*&#!"!!#&!!+7X5(!!*&!>
!#!*!!!L'844K"#!L5-4K(!E!#F!G!#!&!!"!)!#!844K-8&&#!#"#!<L-4K!!!L'844K'&!!^&"!#"#!KL-4K!!!L'844K("#"!!!"!#!!*!8447'#!!*!!"!()8(3(KJNJLN'#!#!##!#!#+X4#*'!#!!!!!#&!&!!#'!"!&!##"!#(!!!*&!"!*%!!!*!!#!&#!!
!!*#\!!&"!!!!(!#!"!#'!#!"!!!&!&!!P!#(!#&!P!!>!"!"!!##!!#'#"!&*!#!(8 -B5%CD-"0.02%%%$2CB:0$,$2,$24.D5$%%55E(',E(5/2%55($%$2.%$2'$2,$24./0.%6/,$2'/3$$.5%'%''$$(,$./&6$E,%04$2'/%$22%55($%$2%.%''5%/$20%.
$2,$24..((6/,6&%6,&3$.%0%$%&%55E,2&%,E(5/2%55($%$2.'$2,$24.(%%%'((3$24'0."-0..%0%0./0.%6((3,$2%F2$24,$.%$%2,%F2$24,$.%$%/0.%62.$.%2%3$%%(2,0.,.$42%$2D!$!!*E!#F!G#!DJD!!!N'#\#!DJD!!!N(!D\!&!D!!!EFG#!(
!*!_!:'&
)#^#-!G+7'84+8#F!VD!%Z!N)!8!##F!!D#!!3(3(7JNJXN(!!!'"!#&!!#!(-$($%$.3$5E$,,6&%04%$%&.((65E$,,%23,E(5/2%202%3$%$..02'%$'$%'052&.'$($%$..((65E$,,50.02%%(E(.'.E$.%6($.,3$%$2%/52.$E"(2!#!"!!!!!&"!!!!!(#!
!#!#>/:'"!#!*!#!!!!##&!#!&!'!!#'#!##&!(-/5($23$%5'/2.%2,,..%'%$25%C2,:0$,'$2,$24.$2%$2GBDBGD'%2,$%$2(.:0.%.((6%6.$.0523$'$2,$24'E((2.$.%2&$.%6/,%6)%$E.2,5($$.'02,$2%,5%,/52.$E"(2/&60.,$2/1$24'$2,$24'
E((2.$.%2&!"!&!$!"!#!!#!#!!"!)&#!##!&!$!"!#!&!!#Q"5%&.((6,E(5,,E(5,$2/22.%%%'0%00.2,$2%2.$%&$.555$%2,/5($.$2%/.'.$(%545$2,%55($6(5&.$(2.$,%$2.$./5($/2%&%,)2%(2,0..2,'0('$((./$2$24(2,0.2,.!!*&!!*!&#!(
&!!!&!#!!**!(!"&!#!#!!*'#!#'#!'!##"!&*"!!!!&*!P!!( !"55E('/,$'$%$2%2H$.%$24.$%,E(5/2%5(22,72,$%$2(0..((62,$%$2,052%054,$24'$%.5$2%.'..%/%,5%,.%2,,.!!P!#&-!&!!###!!>!"!#"!&*&#&!P!!#!&!P!!#>#!*->!!J5LU
N(!!'!&#!!&!!!!!!"!)#!#!(#"!"$&(51$242,'$($%$..((6:0$,2((23,E(5/2%2,,E(5/2%"%$0(/5.$.$.%65(,2,E(5/2%3$%$2%B2.5%%$2202&H5%$2D!!#!$!#!'!!##!!*!%&*!P!!"!!!!($$$%%&'$$$((%%'!
)#^#-!G+7'84+8#F!VD!%Z!N)!5!$!!*!!&!!###"!*P!!"!!&#"!!##!"!!!!!P!!!(!!*!!#!"!!#!!*!#$!!(/5%$6$($%&**:0.%,,.$42%$23$((6/5%$6(3$%%H$.%$242,'0%0(2,0..'%.002,$24#!!#!"*'!DJD!!!N#!#!&!!&#$!#!"!!!!'#&!("!9
" -22)02%$23$%%2,$%$2(.:0.%5($/$2&E$3'%H$.%$24.$%5(255($%$23.E$3,2,,$%$2%%$%/.($.%,02,>2,$%$2(.$2,$24.?%'((3$24.%''//2%.2%,$E$.(!$,%.-)!L(+(3JNJ8NJN'!#!!!!&!#>*->!!J5LUN(!&!!#"!!!!!#!!#"!&*!#!#!!!*!*
*!!JK4UN&#!(!#&!!P!#&!!#&#F!!P!(##'#!!!"!&!'!!!#!!""!##"!&*!&!!J&!!!!N&!#!!#(##&!!!P!!#"#!!($424-!!!!#!"!!#!*(=!!#'!P!##"'!&!!#!##!!#(*!#!*&!*!3(L(<(!!>!#!!#(2,.5:0$/2%.-###!!!#!#!#>'!###!!'*G*!!!#!#
(!!!!!&!!###!!!##!($%"(22$(%/.-E$.,5(2.E2%62.06/$%%,3$%%$.2,$%$2(0.:0.%.2,$%$2'55E(.$%5(2/,$'$%$23$((6:0$,5$%.%6($.$24%$.2,$%$2(0.$..$%5(2/,$'$%$23$((2,%,,..%$%/.,$.0..,$2%$..%''5%$2(0,$2460%2%($/$%,
%(2,.5.$424,$E3&2,5E/2%$/5E/2%.GBD8 -B2,$%$2(.D"0.02%%%$2GBDBGDB$2,$24.D$2,,$%$2%5E$.$2.'5%C%$%&//$..$2/0.%/1'$2,$24.%%.%6($.$24%2,$%$2(0.3$((2%-
)#^#-!G+7'84+8#F!VD!%Z!N)!3E.$42$'$2%(&,%$/2%(''%052%.%6$($%&'%2$46,3$%$23$$%3$((6(%,I%%$%3$(($2,,E(5/2%,E(5/2%'26&55%$.!&\#!#!!!$!!*Q)'#'*$*J!"!N)!!E*+$*"!!JN!A#*!#!G!#!*JGN#)!#!!!J)N)!*J#!"!!N,*J!"
!N)!!E*!!!!!'&!>!#!!54*!'&!!*!!#'#!!#!"!!!*!!(!!#!"!!!!*&!!!!##!!"!- !#!*(9!0%.&%$-!*!"!!!"#!#!&"!!P!!#!#!"!!!!Q!##"*!*\!)!<!*=#"06($%$-E!!!"#!#!*&!&K44`#!$!!*(##!!$!'*'&!!!!#!)#^#!!(!!$!'*'&!!!!#!)#
^#!!(!#!!P!#!!!!!!&#!(!!&!P!!"!!!!!!#!#(!!"!!!#!'!!#'##"!&*&#'#!#!#!&!3(L(<(!!#!!&!!!!!"!)#!5!#!"!!!()"!#!#!&!!!8(3(KJNJKN(
)#^#-!G+7'84+8#F!VD!%Z!N)!K9(2%$20&#!((G"!55E(!#F!!P!!!!&#!'!#"!#&!!!8(3(KJNJKNJ#F!E#N#!5J!P!#E#N!#!"!!!'#!*&!!!!!"!)'$!!&#"Q+(!#!"!!!!!#&#!#!"!!#!!#!!##!!!J!#>N'!!&!3(L(<'##"!&*#!#!!((G"!,2$(!#F!!P!
!!!!&#!!#!%!"!#&!!!8(3(KJNJKNJ#F!E#N#!5J!P!#E#N!#!"!!!'#!!&!!!!!"!)((G"!55E(!#F!!P!!!!&#!'!#"!#&!!!8(3(KJNJKNJ#F!E#N#!5J!P!#E#N!#!"!!!'#!*&!!!!!"!)'$!!&#"Q+(!#!"!!!!!#&#!#!"!!#!!#!!##!!!J!#>N'!!&!3(L
(<'##"!&*#!#!!(
)#^#-!G+7'84+8#F!VD!%Z!N)!L""=>? "0.02%%%$2CBD202&.,'$2,50.02%%6)%$E*'%2,.(/2%'%/52.$E"(2/0.%6/%2,,%/$2%$2/,%%%506($'$($%&2,.'%:0.%,(2,0.2,7,E(5/2%55($%$23$((2%H,%6$($%&'%$%&%'02,2,5E$,%:0$%5E$.$2'2,
,5$%($/5E/2%.'%'((3$24.-=!!"!!*"!!!(!"#!#"&!!>!!!*!(!&!!"!!*"!!!()!!#!#!!!!!!A#!*()!*U!!"!)'!!*"!!*U=!!!)#!!*=!=!!!)!*#-(!!##!&!!!"!!J!*N!#!!!"!*!(!!"!"!!#!*#!*!!!)%#!#!P!!#*-!#!!('!!##!"!!&"!*&!!##(
!!!!!!&!!!!*!!!"!(!#!"!!!!*&!!#&!#&#!#!(!#=!*#!#!"!!*#!#!"!!843<(!*##*-!#!!('!!##!"!!&"!*&!!##(!#!#!"&!!!!!!*(!!#!#!!!##(
)#^#-!G+7'84+8#F!VD!%Z!N)!<""=>?"+N#!&!#(!!#!(!#!&!>"!!#!!!&!P!#!J!!(8N(!#!#!!##!!#*!!!##!!JN(8N!"&!!#E!*+<'84+8#!&!"&!!!#QN!!#!G*"!*##!P!!!!&!&!#!8U"!!(N!!!!#!!!#!#*!!(8U!#!&!'#$!!!>"!!!(*!!!+8U!!!#
54U!!(F!E)"!#!!#!!"!!#!(N!&!!!!#!!'#$!!%'!P!+8U*!!!#54U!!(#N#!#!!J+N+8U*!!(!!!!!!#&!!*!!!
+-?GGGE?E?'E8 !+(#!!P!!!!!*5'84+8(!#!!P!!!!&#!+3+++G*(8(!*''#!!"!!!!##!*!"#!!#!*!*!!#!!P!Z!D(!!"#!!!!#!(!P!##!#!!#!&("9"("-!!!!&!#!\##!\#!!&!#!#!(!$!!*E!#F!G#!DJD!!!N'#\#!DJD!!!N(!D\!&!D!!!EFG#!(!*!/
!:'&!##F!!D#!!3(3(7JNJXN(%:0$/2%.'%0%02,.5/%;.<<<<<<<<<<<<(202&QE!&!"#!#*''!*!"#!#!&#!"!!!&!!!*(!!!!"#!#!"!!"!!!#&!!!"!)(
8%202&:0$/2%./%3$%.5%%3%.3,$24.%%.2,%''$51.52.5.($,3.%2,.(.;.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<(!*Q!&!!##!!5#!P!##!8(3(KJNJKN!#F!!P!!!&#"!!*!#!(!$!"!#!#!#!#!!"!)*!!#%#"!!*(%2.$.%2&:0$/2%./%.0%%%55.,5)%$./5(/2%&%2,/5%$6(
3$%,)2%(2,0..2,%62'$$(.5%.'%5)%0%3$4%24%$E$/5%'$,2%$'$,5$2%.'2'($%;.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<(E!#F!!!$!"!-+Q)!*!#!"!!#!#!"!!#!!!!#!*!#!!''#!!*#!'!*#$!#!'#!#!!!#(!!*&!!*!&#!(&!!!&!#!!**!(!"&!#!#!!*'#!#'#!'!'##"!
&*"!!!!&*!P!!(%:0$/2%.'%0%02,.(/2%6)%$E*/%;.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<8(%$2GBDBGD:0$.%$2'$2,$24.Q!#!&Q+("!*#!!!!!*!!#&&&!!#W8(#!#!"!!!#!"!!!*!!(
5!$((%$2GBDBGD6/%;.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<5(!*!#!!!"!)#!P!!!>!!!!!#!&!#(3(!*#!!!#!!!"#!!#!!#!###!!#!!##!#!!#!*&!!!!#(K(!#!!!!#!!'!*"!OOO#!!OOO!#!$!!#"#!#>/:!#!!#!!*##!5##*'84+8'*"!OOOOO"#OOOO!#(OOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!(G!'G*QOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"!!*!%
+=>?2,$%$2.(%,%%:0.%'2,$%$2(.'9( .%%$2+(!#!"!!!!!#&#!#!"!!#!!#!!##!!!J!#>N!!&!3(L(<'##"!&*#!#!!(
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: CANDI N. JEFFERSON, SENIOR PLANNER PAUL DORLING, AICP, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING THROUGH: CITY MANAGER DATE: March 28, 2012 SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM 9.C. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 WAIVER REQUESTS/SW DELRAY ONCE, LLC ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Consideration of four (4) waiver requests for the proposed new
three-story Saxena White Corporate Office building to allow 9 ft. floor to ceiling height for the rooftop pavilion where 10 ft. is required pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(1)(b), to
allow 8’11” and 13’0” ft. stacking distances where a 50 ft. stacking distance is required for parking lots with 51 or more spaces pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D) (3)(c)(1), to allow
50% frontage at a maximum setback of 10 ft. along SE 1st Avenue where 70%-90% is required pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(1), to allow 11.59% frontage at a minimum setback of
15 ft. for heights above 25’ along SE 1st Avenue where 70% is required, and to allow 76% of the ground level floor area for floor levels above 25’ where a 70% maximum is allowed pursuant
to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(2). BACKGROUND Waiver Requests LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5) Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body must
make a finding that granting the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create
an unsafe situation; and, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant
or owner. Waiver #1 (Minimum Floor Height)
Minimum Floor Height Requirements: A waiver has been requested to allow a minimum floor height of 9’0” from finished floor to finished ceiling, instead of the required 10’0” minimum
floor height for the rooftop pavilion,pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13 (F)(1)(b). Pursuant to Section 4.4.13 (F)(1)(b), a minimum of ten feet (10’) distance is required from the finished
floor to the finished ceiling. The applicant has proposed a floor to ceiling height of 9’-0” for the roof deck level above the third floor. An analysis of this waiver request is provided
below: The applicant has provided the following justification statement regarding the waiver request: “The property owner would like to keep a 10’6” ceiling for the first, second and
third floor. This is to keep the building height proportional to the existing building heights of surrounding structures, such as Worthing Place, thus maintaining the streets proportions.”
The structure is proposed at a height of 45’. The maximum allowable height is 48’, thus allowing room for the rooftop level pavilion floor height to be raised by one (1) foot. Thus,
the waiver request is not supportable. Specifically, adjusting the floor height to a minimum of 9’0” finished floor to finished ceiling does not affect the neighboring areas and does
not create an unsafe situation. However, granting of the requested waiver will result in the granting of a special privilege as it would not be supported under similar circumstances
elsewhere. Consequently, positive findings cannot be made with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Waiver #2 (Minimum Stacking Distance) Stacking Distance Requirements: A waiver has
been requested to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), to reduce minimum stacking distance to 8’11½” along SE 1st Avenue and 13’0” for the alleyway to the east for the eighty-two (82) space
parking lot where fifty feet (50’) of stacking is required. The applicant has provided the following justification with regard to the waiver request: “We are providing an 8’11” stacking
distance from the property line. Because the site is only 128’-0” wide, it would be difficult to setback the parking 50’-0” from the property line”. The code does not give consideration
to distribution via multiple access points that result in reduction of the impact to any one access point. Given the three (3) possible entries and exits, no stacking issues are anticipated
and the waiver can be supported. Based upon the above, the requested waivers are supportable. Therefore, the stacking provided will not negatively affect the neighboring areas or create
an unsafe situation. Granting of the requested waiver will not diminish the provision of public facilities or result in the grant of a special privilege as similar waivers have been
granted to other projects on similar basis. Consequently, positive findings can be made in the reduction of the stacking distance requirement for all access points with respect to LDR
Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Waiver #3 (Minimum Ground Level Setbacks and Frontage) Ground Level Setback and Frontage Requirements: A waiver has been requested to allow construction of the new
structure that will have only 50% of its frontage along SE 1st Avenue set back 10’ or less rather than the 70%-90%frontage required,
pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(1). Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13 (F)(4)(c)(1), a minimum of 70% and a maximum of 90% of the building frontage shall be set back no greater than
ten feet (10’) from the property line for buildings up to twentyfive feet (25’) in height. The remaining length of the building shall be setback a minimum of fifteen feet (15’). The
applicant has provided the following justification statement regarding the waiver request: “The architect is fully aware and respects the section of the LDR’s requirements for frontage.
The architect has strived to meet as close as possible the intent of the code with reference to SE 1st Avenue. The layout of the site makes additional frontage unfeasible. It is important
to have two exits onto SE 1st Avenue for adequate traffic flow.” Due to the minimal 128’ depth of the lot, it was necessary to provide additional vehicle access points and related parking
along the SE 1st Avenue frontage. By doing so, it is not feasible to comply with the CBD guidelines for the 70%-90% frontage requirement at a ten foot (10’) setback. Therefore, the waiver
is supportable. Granting of the requested waiver will not diminish the provision of public facilities or result in the grant of a special privilege. Likewise, granting the waiver to
LDR Section 4.4.13 (F)(4)(b)(1) does not affect the neighboring areas or create an unsafe situation. Consequently, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5)
in the reduction of the required setback along SE 1st Avenue. Waiver #4 (Upper Level Floor Area and Frontage) Upper Level Floor Area and Frontage Requirements: A waiver has been requested
to allow 11.59% of the building frontage to be setback a minimum of 15’ whereas a minimum of 70% is required. A maximum of 70% of the ground level floor area is allowed on the upper
floors, whereas over 76% of the ground floor area is proposed. Pursuant toLDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(2), the minimum floor area for each floor contained within the portion of the structure
that is 25’ to 48’ in height shall not exceed (seventy percent) 70% of the floor areacontained within the ground level footprint. The 3rd level and roof level fall within this height
range. Seventy-six (76%) is proposed, whereas seventy percent (70%) is the maximum. There is a minimum setback requirement of fifteen feet (15’) for 70% of the building frontage between
25’ and 48’. This would require a minimum of 267.75’ of the frontage of the building to be setback at a minimum of 15’ while only 44.33’ or 11.59% is proposed. The applicant has requested
a waiver to these setback and floor area requirements. The applicant has provided the following justification with regard to these two requests: “The architect is fully aware and respects
the section of the LDRs requirements for frontage and floor area. The architect has strived to meet as closely as possible the intent of the code with reference to SE 1st Avenue. The
layout of the site make additional frontage unfeasible. It is important to have two exits onto SE 1st Avenue for adequate traffic flow. Also for the floor area for the third floor we
came as close as possible to the required 70% requirement”. The east-west width of the lot measures approximately 128’,while the north-south depth of the site is 382.5’,or almost twice
the width of the site. This site configuration presents limitations to accommodate
the required building frontage along the narrow width of the site on SE 1st Avenue. Likewise the need to locate the parking lot towards the rear of the site and the ingress/egress driveway
on the east alley r.o.w., makes it difficult to meet the required building frontages while achieving a well-proportioned, visually attractive, and economically feasible solution along
SE 1st Street. The parking lot location and unusually long configuration of the site resulted in a well-conceived and geometrically wellproportioned building that has in turn impacted
the required building frontages along SE 1st Avenue and SE 1st Street. The applicant has attempted to meet the intent of the code via provisions of a decorative wall along SE 1st Street
creating the sense of an urbanized downtown development which is the intent of the CBD District Design Guidelines. Under these circumstances the waivers can be supported. The waivers
will not adversely affect neighboring properties or diminish the provision of public facilities. The waivers would also be supported under similar circumstances and therefore will not
result in the grant of a special privilege. Thus, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 2.4.5 (B) (5). REVIEW BY OTHERS The Site Plan Review and Appearance Board
reviewed the four (4) waiver requests at their meeting of Februrary 22, 2012 in conjunction with the Class V Site Plan approval. The Board made the following recommendations: 1. By a
vote of 6-0, theSPRAB recommended approval to the requested waiver to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(1)(b), Minimum Floor Heightto allow 9 ft. for the rooftop pavilion where 10 ft. is required,
only in the event that the required height cannot be achievedwithout compromising the structural integrity and architectural design or exceeding the maximum 48’ height limitation. 2.
By a vote of 6-0, theSPRAB recommended approval to the requested waiver to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), Minimum Stacking Distanceto allow 20’ along SE 1st Avenue and 13’ along the
east alley, where 50 ft. is otherwise required. The Board modified this motion from the applicant’s request to allow 8’11½” along SE 1st Avenue. 3. By a vote of 6-0, theSPRAB recommended
approval to the requested waiver to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(1), Minimum Ground Level Building Setback and Frontageto allow 50% frontage along SE 1st Avenue where 70%-90% frontage
at a maximum setback of ten feet is otherwise required on floor levels up to 25’. 4. By a vote of 6-0,the SPRAB recommended approval to the requested waiver to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(2),
Minimum Upper Level Floor Area and Frontageto allow 28% frontage along SE 1st Avenue where 70% frontage at a minimum setback of fifteen feet is otherwise required and to allow 76% floor
area where a 70% maximum floor area is allowed on floor levels from 25’ to 48’. This motion has been modified from the aforementioned 28% to the corrected 11.59% frontage currently being
requested by the applicant. A detailed description and analysis of the development proposal is contained within the attached Site Plan Review and Appearance Board staff report of February
22, 2012. RECOMMENDATION By Separate M otions: M inimum Floor Height W aiver:
Deny the waiver request to LD R Section 4.4.13(F)(1)(b), to reduce the m inimum floor height from the required 10’0” from finished floor to finished ceiling, to 9’0” for the rooftop
pavilion, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is not consistent with LD R Section 2.4.7(B)(5). M inimum Stacking Distance
W aiver: Approve the waiver request to LD R Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), to reduce the m inimum stacking distance requirem ent from 50’ for parking lots with 51 or more spaces to 8’ 11½
” along SE 1st Avenue and 13’0” along the alleyway, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with LD R Section
2.4.7(B)(5). M inimum Ground Level Building Setback and Frontage W aiver: Approve the waiver request to LD R Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(1), to reduce the required ground floor setback and
frontage from 70% -90% at a maximum of ten feet (10’) to50% along SE 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request
is consistent with LD R Section 2.4.7(B)(5). M inimum U pper Level Floor Area and Frontage W aiver: Approve the waiver request LD R Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(2), to increase the upper
level floor area to allow 76% of the ground floor area where a 70% maximum is allowed and reduce required frontage of 70% at a minimum setback of 15’ to 11.59% on the floor levels from
25’ to 48’ in height, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with LD R Section 2.4.7 (B)(5).
+ ?GGGE?E?'E!98=!"+(!!&"!!P!!!!!*5'84+8(8(!#*!!!##!*!"#!!#!*!*!!&"!!P!>!=!!!(!!"#!!!!#!(!P!##!#!#!&!(!9-)!8(3(<JNJKN'&"!'!"#*%!#!!&"!QJN#"!!*!!!!WJN*#!"!WJN!!!W#'J#N!!!!"!!!!&"!&#!!##!!!!*!&!((="!GE!
)!3(3(+5JENJ+NJN'!!!J+4UN#!!P!#!!#!!#!(!!#!!!!!J7UN!#!%!"!"!!#(0(,%3$E%,0%/$2$/0/'($4%'/J%KJ642%,;.<<<<<<<<<<<<<
8 (="!%!!P!!)!3(L(7JNJ5NJNJ+N'%#!*!!JK4UN!P!#%*-!JK+N!!(!"#!#XU++Y:%+"!!#+5U-4:%!#$!!*!!(--&*'K4U%!P!#!!#!*-&JX8N!%(!!P!!#&"!!!#!P!!(0(,%3$E%,0%.%1$24,$.%2642%,;.<<<<<<<<<<<<<(="!D#!"!!%#E!!P!!)!3(3(
+5JENJ3NJNJ+N'<4b#>74b!#!!!%!!!!!J+4UN!!*!#&!*-"!J8KUN!(!!!!#!!%!!!!J+KUN(!!P!!#&"!&!!&!!>!!#!!J+4UN>!%!!*!((+"!!*!!JK4bN!!(0(,%3$E%$2.%/H$/0/402,(E(.%612,'2%4:0$/2%.642%,;.<<<<<<<<<<<<<(="!F!!"!E!#E
!!P!!)!3(3(+5JENJ3NJNJ8N'!!!!#&!!!8KU3XU!!>!!#!"!*!!J<4bN!!!#&!&!#!"!(!5#!"!#!"!&!!(!"!*->!!J<LbN!#'&!!!"!*!!J<4bN!>(!!!%!P!!!!!!J+KUN!"!*!!J<4bN!#!!&!!8KU#3XU(!!P!!#&"!!!!%#!!P!!(0(,%3$E%$2.%055(E('
(2,'2%4:0$/2%.642%,;.<<<<<<<<<<<<<
5 5(!*!#!!!"!)#!P!!!>!!!!!#!"!!&!####!!!#!!!&!!!"!)(3(!*#!!!#!!!"#!!#!!#!###!!#!!##!#!!'!*!>!#!!!&!!!!#(K(!#!!!!#!!'!*"!OO#!!OOO!&"!!P!(L(!#!!!!#!!'!*!!*##!5##*'84+8'*"!OOOO"#OOOO!#(OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQ!(G!'G*OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"!!'*!%
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Paul Dorling, AICP, Director of Planning and Zoning
THROUGH:City Manager
DATE:March 28, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 9.B. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST/ DELRAY GAS STATION
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
The action before the City Commission is approval of a Conditional Use request to reestablish a
gasoline station use with food sales at 14111 South Military Trail pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(E).
BACKGROUND
The subject property is a one acre site which is located south of the Public Self Storage Facility on the
west side of Military Trail, south of Lake Ida Road. The property is bounded to the south by Tire
Kingdom, to the north and west by the Public Self Storage Facility and to the east (across Military Trail)
by High Point of Delray East (Condo Development).
The subject property contains a vacant Valero Gas Station, which was legally established in 1983 and
vacated in late 2009. Pursuant to 2.4.5(E)(6), if a conditional use is discontinued or abandoned for a
continuous period of 180 days, the conditional use cannot be reestablished without a new application
b eing filed, reviewed and approved. The current property owner is actively marketing the property to
p otential end uses that would rehabilitate the property and utilize it as a gasoline station with a
convenience store. If the conditional use approval is granted, a site development plan consistent with the
LDRs will be required. It is noted this will require extensive improvements and upgrades to the
landscaping, driveway connections and signage.
REVIEW BY OTHERS
The proposed Conditional Use request was considered by the Planning and Zoning Board on March 19,
2012 at which time the Board recommended approval, subject to conditions, on a 7 to 0 vote.
RECOMMENDATION
By motion, approve the Conditional Use request to reestablish a gasoline station with food sales, based
upon positive findings with respect to Section 2.4.5(E)(5) (Conditional Use Findings) and Chapter 3
(Required Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, and consistency with the policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions of approval: That a site development plan be
p rocessed which shall include significant landscape improvements including those noted in the attached
landscape technical comments (Appendix B) signage in compliance with LDR Section 4.6.7, and
driveway modifications as noted in the staff report.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:CANDI N. JEFFERSON, SENIOR PLANNER
PAUL DORLING, AICP, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
THROUGH:CITY MANAGER
DATE:March 28, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 9.C. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
WAIVER REQUESTS/ SW DELRAY ONCE, LLC
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Consideration of four (4) waiver requests for the proposed new three-story Saxena White Corporate
Office building to allow 9 ft. floor to ceiling hei ght for the rooftop pavilion where 10 ft. is required
pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(1)(b), to allow 8’11” and 13’0” ft. stacking distances where a 50 ft.
stacking distance is required for parking lots with 51 or more spaces pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)
(3)(c)(1), to allow 50% frontage at a maximum setback of 10 ft. along SE 1 st Avenue where 70%-
90% is required pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(1), to allow 11.59% frontage at a minimum
setback of 15 ft. for heights above 25’ along SE 1 st Avenue where 70% is required, and to allow 76% o f
the ground level floor area for floor levels above 25’ where a 70% maximum is allowed pursuant to
LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(2).
BACKGROUND
Waiver Requests LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5) Findings:
Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body must make a
finding that granting the waiver:
(a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area;
(b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities;
(c) Shall not create an uns afe situation; and,
(d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the sa me waiver would be granted under
similar circumstances on other propert y for another applicant or owner.
Waiver #1 (Minimum Floor Height)
Minimum Floor Height Requirements:
A waiver has been requested to allow a minimu m floor height of 9’0” from finished floor t o
finished ceiling, instead of the required 10’0” minimum floor height for the rooftop
pavilion,pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13 (F)(1)(b).
Pursuant to Section 4.4.13 (F)(1)(b), a minimum of ten feet (10’) distance is required from the finishe d
floor to the finished ceiling. The applicant has proposed a floor to ceiling height of 9’-0” for the roo f
deck level above the third floor. An analysis of this waiver request is provided below:
The applicant has provided the following justific ation statement regarding the waiver request:
“The property owner would like to keep a 10’6” ceiling for the first, second and third floor. This is to
keep the building height proportional to the existing building heights of surrounding structures, such as
Worthing Place, thus maintaining the streets proportions.”
The structure is proposed at a height of 45’. The maximum allowable height is 48’, thus allowing roo m
for the rooftop level pavilion floor height to be ra ised by one (1) foot. Thus, the waiver request is no t
supportable. Specifically, adjusting the floor height to a minimum of 9’0” finished floor to finishe d
ceiling does not affect the neighboring areas and does not create an unsafe situation. However, grantin g
of the requested waiver will result in the granting of a special privilege as it would not be supporte d
under similar circumstances elsewhere. Consequently , positive findings cannot be made with respect t o
LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5).
Waiver #2 (Minimum Stacking Distance)
Stacking Distance Requirements:
A waiver has been requested to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), to reduce minimum stackin g
distance to 8’11½” along SE 1 st Avenue and 13’0” for the alleyway to the east for the eighty-tw o
(82) space parking lot where fifty feet (50’) of stacking is required.
The applicant has provided the following justific ation with regard to the waiver request:
“We are providing an 8’11” stacking distance from the property line. Because the site is only 128’-0 ”
wide, it would be difficult to setback the parking 50’-0” from the property line”.
The code does not give consideration to distribution vi a multiple access points that result in reduction o f
the impact to any one access point. Given the three (3) possible entries and exits, no stacking issues ar e
anticipated and the waiver can be supported. Based upon the above, the requested waivers ar e
supportable. Therefore, the stacking provided will not negatively affect the neighboring areas or creat e
an unsafe situation. Granting of the requested waiver will not diminish the provision of public facilitie s
or result in the grant of a special privilege as si milar waivers have been gr anted to other projects o n
similar basis. Consequently, positive findings can be made in the reduction of the stacking distanc e
requirement for all access points with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5).
Waiver #3 (Minimum Ground Le vel Setbacks and Frontage)
Ground Level Setback and Frontage Requirements:
A waiver has been requested to allow construction of the new structure that will have only 50% o f
its frontage along SE 1 st Avenue set back 10’ or less rather than the 70%-90%frontage required ,
pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(1).
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13 (F)(4)(c)(1), a minimum of 70% and a maximum of 90% of the buildin g
frontage shall be set back no greater than ten feet (10’) from the property line for buildings up to twenty -
five feet (25’) in height. The remaining length of the building shall be setback a minimum of fifteen fee t
(15’).
The applicant has provided the following justific ation statement regarding the waiver request:
“The architect is fully aware and respects the section of the LDR’s requirements for frontage. Th e
architect has strived to meet as close as possible the intent of the code with reference to SE 1 st
Avenue. The layout of the site makes additional frontage unfeasible. It is important to have two exit s
onto SE 1 st Avenue for adequate traffic flow.”
Due to the minimal 128’ depth of the lot, it was necessary to provide additional vehicle access point s
and related parking along the SE 1 st Avenue frontage. By doing so, it is not feasible to comply with th e
CBD guidelines for the 70%-90% frontage requirement at a ten foot (10’) setback. Therefore, the waive r
is supportable.
Granting of the requested waiver will not diminish th e provision of public facilities or result in the gran t
of a special privilege. Likewise, granting the waiver to LDR Section 4.4.13 (F)(4)(b)(1) does not affec t
the neighboring areas or create an unsafe situation. Consequently, positive findings can be made wit h
respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5) in the reduction of the required setback along SE 1 st Avenue.
Waiver #4 (Upper Level Floor Area and Frontage)
Upper Level Floor Area an d Frontage Requirements :
A waiver has been requested to allow 11.59% of the building frontage to be setback a minimum o f
15’ whereas a minimum of 70% is required. A m aximum of 70% of the ground level floor are a
is allowed on the upper floors, whereas over 76% of the ground floor area is proposed.
Pursuant toLDR Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(2), the mini mum floor area for each floor contained within th e
portion of the structure that is 25’ to 48’ in height shall not exceed (seventy percent) 70% of the floo r
areacontained within the ground level footprint. The 3 rd level and roof level fall within this heigh t
range.Seventy-six (76%) is proposed, whereas seventy percent (70%) is the maximum. There is a
minimum setback requirement of fifteen feet (15’) for 70% of the building frontage between 25’ an d
48’. This would require a minimum of 267.75’ of the frontage of the building to be setback at a
minimum of 15’ while only 44.33’ or 11.59% is proposed. The applicant has requested a waiver to thes e
setback and floor area requirements.
The applicant has provided the following justific ation with regard to these two requests:
“The architect is fully aware and respects the section of the LDRs requirements for frontage and floo r
area. The architect has strived to meet as closely as possible the intent of the code with reference to S E
1 st Avenue. The layout of the site make additional fr ontage unfeasible. It is important to have two exit s
onto SE 1 st Avenue for adequate traffic flow. Also for the floor area for the third floor we came as clos e
as possible to the required 70% requirement”.
The east-west width of the lot measures approximate ly 128’,while the north-south depth of the site i s
382.5’,or almost twice the width of the site. This si te configuration presents limitations to accommodat e
the required building frontage along the narrow width of the site on SE 1 st Avenue. Likewise the need
to locate the parking lot towards the rear of the site and the ingress/egress driveway on the east alley
r.o.w., makes it difficult to meet the required building frontages while achieving a well-p roportioned,
visually attractive, and economically feasible solution along SE 1 st Street. The parking lot location and
unusually long configuration of the site resulted in a well-conceived and geometrically well-
proportioned building that has in turn impacted the required building frontages along SE 1 st Avenue and
SE 1 st Street. The applicant has attempted to meet the intent of the code via provisions of a decorative
wall along SE 1 st Street creating the sense of an urbanize d downtown development which is the intent
of the CBD District Design Guidelines. Under thes e circumstances the waivers can be supported. The
waivers will not adversely affect neighboring properti es or diminish the provi sion of public facilities.
The waivers would also be supporte d under similar circumstances and therefore will not result in the
grant of a special privilege. Thus, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 2.4.5 (B)
(5).
REVIEW BY OTHERS
The Site Plan Review and Appearance Board reviewed the four (4) waiver requests at their meeting of
Februrary 22, 2012 in conjunction with the Class V Si te Plan approval. The Board made the following
recommendations:
1. By a vote of 6-0, theSPRAB recommended approval to the requested waiver to LDR
Section 4.4.13(F)(1)(b), Minimum Floor Height to allow 9 ft. for the rooftop pavilion where
10 ft. is required, only in the event that the required height cannot be achieved without
compromising the structural integrity and architectural design or exceeding the maximum
48’ height limitation.
2. By a vote of 6-0, theSPRAB recommended approval to the requested waiver to LDR
Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), Minimum Stacking Distance to allow 20’ along SE 1 st Avenue
and 13’ along the east alley , where 50 ft. is otherwise required. The Board modified this
motion from the applicant’s request to allow 8’11½” along SE 1 st Avenue.
3. By a vote of 6-0, theSPRAB recommended approval to the requested waiver to LDR
Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(1), Minimum Ground Level Building Setback and Frontage to allow
50% frontage along SE 1 st Avenue where 70%-90% frontage at a maximum setback of ten
feet is otherwise required on floor levels up to 25’.
4. By a vote of 6-0,the SPRAB recommended a pproval to the requested waiver to LDR
Section 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(2), Minimum Upper Level Floor Area and Frontage to allow 28%
frontage along SE 1 st Avenue where 70% frontage at a minimum setback of fifteen feet is
otherwise required and to allow 76% floor area where a 70% maximum floor area is allowed
on floor levels from 25’ to 48’. This motion has been modified from the aforementioned 28%
to the corrected 11.59% frontage curren tly being requested by the applicant.
A detailed description and analysis of the development proposal is cont ained within the attached Site
Plan Review and Appearance Board staff report of February 22, 2012.
RECOMMENDATION
By Separ at e Mot i ons:
Mi ni mum Fl oor He i g ht Wai v e r :
Deny t he wai ver r equest t o LDR Sect i on 4.4.13(F)(1)(b), t o r educe t he mi ni mum f l oor hei ght f r om t h e
r equi r ed 10’0” f r om f i ni shed f l oor t o f i ni shed cei l i ng, t o 9’0” f or t he r oof t op pavi l i on, by adopt i ng t h e
f i ndi ngs of f act and l aw cont ai ned i n t he st af f r epor t , and f i ndi ng t hat t he r equest i s not consi st ent wi t h
LDR Sect i on 2.4.7(B)(5).
Mi ni mum St ac ki ng Di s t anc e Wai v e r :
Approve t he wai ver r equest t o LDR Sect i on 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), t o r educe t he mi ni mum st acki ng di st anc e
r equi r ement f r om 50’ f or par ki ng l ot s wi t h 51 or mor e spaces t o 8’ 11½” al ong SE 1 st Avenue and 13’0”
al ong t he al l eyway, by adopt i ng t he f i ndi ngs of f act and l aw cont ai ned i n t he st af f r epor t , and f i ndi ng t ha t
t he r equest i s consi st ent wi t h LDR Sect i on 2.4.7(B)(5).
Mi ni mum Gr ound Le v e l Bui l di ng Se t bac k and Fr ont ag e Wai ve r :
Approve t he wai ver r equest t o LDR Sect i on 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(1), t o r educe t he r equi r ed gr ound f l oor set bac k
and f r ont age f r om 70%-90% at a maxi mum of t en f eet (10’) t o50% al ong SE 1 st Avenue, by adopt i ng t h e
f i ndi ngs of f act and l aw cont ai ned i n t he st af f r epor t , and f i ndi ng t hat t he r equest i s consi st ent wi t h LDR
Sect i on 2.4.7(B)(5).
Mi ni mum Uppe r Le v e l Fl oor Ar e a and Fr ont ag e Wai v e r :
Approve t he wai ver r equest LDR Sect i on 4.4.13(F)(4)(c)(2), t o i ncr ease t he upper l evel f l oor ar ea t o al l ow
76% of t he gr ound f l oor ar ea wher e a 70% maxi mum i s al l owed and r educe r equi r ed f r ont age of 70% at a
mi ni mum set back of 15’ t o 11.59% on t he f l oor l evel s f r om 25’ t o 48’ i n hei ght , by adopt i ng t he f i ndi ngs o f
f act and l aw cont ai ned i n t he st af f r epor t , and f i ndi ng t hat t he r equest i s consi st ent wi t h LDR Sect i on 2.4.7
(B)(5).
Agenda_Meeting[1].pdf
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Vincent Nolan, Economic Development Director Richard J. Reade, Sustainability Officer/Public Information Officer THROUGH: David T. Harden,
City Manager DATE: March 29, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 9.D. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 RESOLUTION NO. 21-12/DELRAY BEACH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Establish the Delray Beach Economic Development Fund and provide funding from the City's unrestricted General Fund reserves to support economic opportunities (i.e, financial incentives)
within the City of Delray Beach. BACKGROUND During the City Commission's Workshop on March 15, 2012, consensus was provided to pursue funding opportunities to improve the City’s competitive
position with respect to retaining and recruiting corporations and other businesses to Delray Beach. Thus, staff is proposing to create the Delray Beach Economic Development Fund that
would assist in creating sustainable, long-term measures to ensure economic growth in the City. In addition, development of the Economic Development Fund would enable the City to “level
the playing field” with regards to offering financial tools similar to those that are utilized by the most competitive communities -locally, regionally and around the state. The proposed
Delray Beach Economic Development Fund would serve as the City’s funding mechanism to provide the required financial match to leverage State and County financial incentives [i.e., Qualified
Target Industry Refund Program (QTI), Governor's Quick Action Closing Fund and Economic Development Transportation Fund Road Fund] for the retention and recruitment of businesses to
Delray Beach. This new Fund is expected to assist in achieving the City’s economic development goals: . Improve the perception of Delray Beach as business friendly and a viable corporate
destination . Grow sustainable & livable wage jobs (retention and creation) . Encourage entrepreneurship (new & existing) . Increase the Delray Beach tax base
As discussed with the Commission during the March Workshop, funding for the Delray Beach Economic Development Fund is proposed to be provided from the City's unrestricted General Fund
reserves -up to a total of one million dollars ($1,000,000). All expenditures (i.e., financial incentives) from this fund will be awarded following authorization by the City Commission.
Funding the Delray Beach Economic Development Fund would serve as the most critical first step in creating and implementing a successful citywide Economic Development Program. Following
approval of the proposed Resolution No. 21-12, staff will immediately begin to develop specific program guidelines for a local financial incentive program. In the interim, the Delray
Beach Economic Development Fund will announce to the business community and our economic development partners within Palm Beach County and around the state that the City of Delray Beach
is officially ready to welcome new economic development growth throughout our community. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of Resolution No. 21-12, which establishes the Delray Beach
Economic Development Fund and provides funding of up to a total of one million dollars ($1,000,000) from the City's unrestricted General Fund reserves to provide the local match for
State and county business incentive funds.
$ %&%###'##%#'#%&&&'(!!"&'(%&&4"!&'(#"!&%'(9'"'("!"!"E" "!!E#'(#"%"'(9'!!"!&'(!#"!%'(9'!#!&8!!#"!%'(9'!!8!!6&!!"!'(,5C*-9:95:9(9*:965;9'(=*-9&*=&5//665,5*-9&*=5'9;:=(9&-;5:'362*&&!&'(&44"!&'(#"!&
0:96,502$2060*&&'(9'!!!F2111111&)!!8!!!!"!?!*!:!?*>)?!4&!)9'*!:!67#!!"!"&&6A*:!4!669',''5*9'!DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD0120DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD/=5:**96*3DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD&&4
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Randal L. Krejcarek, P.E., LEED AP, GISP, City Engineer Richard C. Hasko, PE, Environmental Services Director THROUGH: David T. Harden,
City Manager DATE: March 23, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 9.E. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 REQUEST DIRECTION ON THE CONVERSION OF S.E. 1ST STREET ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This item is before the Commission for direction on implementation schedule for conversion of SE 1st St from SE 1st Ave to SE 6th Ave.Project #2004-006. BACKGROUND Staff continues to
work with Palm Beach County Traffic in an effort to convert SE 1st Street from S Swinton Avenue to SE 6th Avenue from one-way to two-way. There are several barriers to converting this
street back to two-way: S Swinton Avenue & SE/SW 1st Street The span wire sign at this intersection is currently hanging off FPL poles and FPL does not allow new signals on their poles.
Due to limitations on how close a new mast arm pole can be to existing poles, there currently is not sufficient right-of-way for the installation of new mast arm poles. The property
on the NE corner of this intersection is in for redevelopment and a 20’ by 20’ right-of-way corner clip is being requested as part of the site plan approval. Staff has met with representatives
of the Sundy House, but the corner that the Sundy House is willing to provide an easement on (NW corner) is not the corner that an easement is needed. Typically, with one mast arm planned
for the NE corner, the second mast arm would be placed at the SW corner of this intersection. SE 5th Avenue & SE 1st Street Barriers at this intersection include; signal heads need to
be added for westbound traffic and two new poles are required on the west approach. The existing roadway configuration does not allow for these two new poles to be installed in the right-of-way,
therefore temporary easements will have to be obtained from the abutting property owners. A consultant will have to be hired to perform the required structural analysis before submission
to Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The trees on the west approach will have to be trimmed so that the new signal heads can be visible to oncoming traffic. The cost of the
signal conversion for this intersection is estimated to be $45,000. The cost to obtain the required easements is dependent on how big the easements are and how long the easements will
be required, therefore are unknown at this time.
SE 6th Avenue & SE 1st Street This conversion is relatively simple because no new signal heads will be required. The work involves relocating signal heads and retiming. Estimated cost
$12,000. Both intersections with Federal Highway (SE 5th Avenue and SE 6th Avenue) will require FDOT permits. Initial conversations with FDOT indicate that in addition to the signal
conversion work, the City will be required to modify several of the crossings at both SE 5th Avenue and SE 6th Avenue in order to bring them up to current ADA standards. The cost to
convert these crossing will not be known until FDOT reviews the permit application. Included in the US 1 Beautification project is a new mast arm signalized intersection at SE 5th Avenue
and SE 1st Street. The US 1 Beautification project has the new mast arm signals designed within the existing right-of-way. No modification, other than making the intersection ADA compliant,
is planned for the intersection of SE 6th Avenue and SE 1st Street as part of the US 1 Beautification project. Due to the proposed increased sidewalk width along US 1, both intersections
will be incurring substantial modifications as part of the US 1 Beautification project. Therefore any modifications required at either the SE 5th Avenue or SE 6th Avenue intersections
for the temporary conversion of these two signalized intersections will be removed when the US 1 project begins. The current schedule has the US 1 Beautification project beginning late
this summer, with completion estimated to be in the fall of 2013. There currently are no Capital funds left in the City’s general fund for this temporary conversion work. Discussions
with CRA staff indicate that they would be open to taking this item to the CRA Board for approval of funding the temporary modifications. If Commission direction is to move forward with
the conversion at this time, SE 1st Street would be converted to two-way from SE 1st Avenue to SE 6th Avenue. The block between S Swinton Avenue and SE 1st Avenue would remain a modified
one-way street until the signal at S Swinton Avenue is converted to handle two-way traffic. RECOMMENDATION Since the permitting process for a temporary conversion is of uncertain length
and long in any case (at least 10 months), and since we would incur additional costs of $65,000 or more, I recommend that we wait on the conversion until the signals are changed as part
of the Federal Highway beautification project, which should be completed in about 18 months.
1 Hasko, Richard To: Krejcarek, Randal Subject: RE: SE 1st st conversion to 2 way at 5th Ave and 6th Ave From: Fattoush Jafar [mailto:FJafar@pbcgov.org] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012
12:23 PM To: Krejcarek, Randal Cc: Sean Reilly Subject: RE: SE 1st st conversion to 2 way at 5th Ave and 6th Ave PlanforSE1stSt&SE6thAve/US1NBis95%done.WecansubmittoFDOTforpermit.AssoonasFDOTapproves
,wecanproceedwiththisone.Ianticipatethistobeapprovedin2or3months.(ThisishowlongittakesFDOTtoreview).Itwilltakeusonemonthtoimplement.PlanforSE1stSt&SE5thAve/US1SBis70%done.CityneedtoverifyROWandUGutil
ities(youdeterminethetimeitwilltakeyou?)SubmittoFDOTforconceptapproval.(IttakesFDOT1to3monthstoreview)PBCwillrevisedbasedontheconceptplanperFDOTcomments+Consultanttoperformstructuralanalysisforpoles.
Willtake1monthto2months.ResubmittoFDOTforreview.(1to3monthsFDOTreview)IfFDOTapproves(NoGuaranteeFDOTwillapprovethesecondround,butIambeingoptimistic):PBCwillreleaseforconstruction.(itwilltake4monthsto
completeconstruction)Duringthese4monthstheCityshouldhelpuswiththeutilitiesandtrimmingtrees.BestCasescenariois10months.Itcouldgoupto2years,ifwehaveROW&utilityconflictsandproblemswithFDOTapprovals.Ifyo
uplantoimplementbothintersectionssimultaneously,wewillsubmitbothtoFDOTforpermittogether.Ihopethishelps.From: Krejcarek, Randal [mailto:Krejcarek@mydelraybeach.com] Sent: Friday, March
30, 2012 11:39 AM To: Fattoush Jafar Cc: Sean Reilly Subject: RE: SE 1st st conversion to 2 way at 5th Ave and 6th Ave Justonemorequestion.IFCommissionsaystoproceedwithtemporaryconversion,canyouprovi
demewithaschedule?IthinkIwillbeaskedthisonTuesnight.Thanks!Randal L. Krejcarek, P.E. LEED AP, GISPCity Engineer
2 Delray Beach, FLPh: 561.243.7322Fx: 561.243.7060krejcarek@MyDelrayBeach.com From: Fattoush Jafar [mailto:FJafar@pbcgov.org] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:13 PM To: Krejcarek, Randal
Cc: Sean Reilly Subject: SE 1st st conversion to 2 way at 5th Ave and 6th Ave HiRandal,Wedidaveryroughreviewandestimate.Belowareourestimatesandassumptions:SE1stSt&SE6thAve/US1NB:Thisistheeasyone.Nosi
gnalheadsaddedtothespan.ShouldnotrequirestructuralanalysisbyFDOT.Costestimated($9,000$13,100)SE1stSt&SE5thAve/US1SB:Thisisthecomplicatedone.Weneedtoaddsignalheadsforthewestboundtraffic.Itisbesttoinst
allthesignalheadsbyadding2polesonthewestside(NW&SW)corners.Weneedtohaveaconsultantdostructuralanalysisforthe2polesweareadding.Wedon’thavetheabilitytodothatinhouseattheCounty.TheCitywillhavetopayforth
at.TheCityneedtohelpuswithtrimmingtheTreesattheSWcornertoprovidetheclearancefortheinstallationofthepoles.Wedon’thavegoodROWplans.TheCitywillneedtohelpuswiththeROWdeterminationforthe2polesonthewestsid
e.Wearenotsureabouttheunderground(UG)utilities.ThereisanUGdrainattheNWcorner,weareassumingthepolecouldbelocatedwithintheROWwithenoughclearancefromthedrain.WearenotsureabouttheUGutilitiesontheSWcorner
.WewillneedadirectionalboretoconnectthesignalheadsfromthenewpolesontheWestsidetothecontrollerontheSEcorner.NWcornersidewalkwillneedtobemodifiedtoaccommodatethenewpoleandthepedestrianmaneuverabilityat
thatcorner.TheCitywillhavetopayforthat.Ifalltheassumptionsareokandnounknowns,thecostwouldbe:o $41,000o $2,000StructuralAnalysiso $1,000$2,000sidewalkmodificationsbytheCity.Ifyouneedanythingelse,letme
know.FattoushUnder Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail
to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing.
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: March 30, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 9.F. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 REVIEW AND
ACCEPTANCE OF REGULARLY SCHEDULED CITY COMMISSION MEETING DATES ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION This item is before the Commission to review and discuss an alternate date for the January 1, 2013
Regular Meeting and provide direction on whether to schedule the January 29, 2013 Annual Citizen's Roundtable. BACKGROUND At the Annual Organizational Meeting on March 29, 2012 the Commission
discussed and accepted the regular meeting dates, with amendments, for the period April 2012 through March 2013. After reviewing the amended schedule, a date still needs to be set in
place of the January 1, 2013 Regular Meeting, because City Hall will be closed in observance of New Year's Day. The consensus of the Commission at the December 13, 2011 Regular Meeting
was to cancel the Annual Citizen’s Roundtable on January 24, 2012 in favor of different options. Staff is requesting direction regarding the Annual Citizen’s Roundtable which would be
scheduled for January 29, 2013. Below is the list of the regularly scheduled City Commission meeting dates for April 2012through March 2013 that were approved at the March 29, 2012 Annual
Organizational Meeting: City Commission Meetings: April 03, 2012-Regular Meeting April 10, 2012-Workshop April 17, 2012-Regular Meeting May 01, 2012-Regular Meeting May 08, 2012-Workshop
May 15, 2012-Regular Meeting June 05, 2012-Regular Meeting June 12, 2012-Workshop June 19, 2012-Regular Meeting
July 05, 2012-Regular Meeting (Thursday) July 10, 2012-Workshop July 17, 2012-Regular Meeting August 07, 2012-Regular Meeting August 14, 2012-Workshop August 21, 2012-Regular Meeting
September 04, 2012-Regular Meeting (Tentative Budget Hearing) September 11, 2012 -Workshop September 20, 2012-Regular Meeting (Final Budget Hearing) (Thursday) October 02, 2012-Regular
Meeting October 09, 2012-Workshop October 16, 2012-Regular Meeting November 06, 2012-Regular Meeting (Election) November 13, 2012-Workshop November 20, 2012-Regular Meeting December
04, 2012-Regular Meeting December 11, 2012-Regular Meeting January 01, 2013-(New Year's Day-City Hall Closed/Meeting date needs to be set) January 08, 2013-Workshop January 15, 2013-Regular
Meeting January 29, 2013-ANNUAL CITIZEN’S ROUNDTABLE-7 PM Old School Square February 05, 2013-Regular Meeting February 12, 2013-Workshop February 19, 2013-Regular Meeting March 05, 2013-Regular
Meeting March 12, 2013-MUNICIPAL ELECTION March 14, 2013-Special Meeting March 19, 2013-Regular Meeting March 28, 2013-ANNUAL ORGANIZATIONAL MEETIN RECOMMENDATION Recommend Commission
set an alternate date for the January 1, 2013 Regular Meeting; and provide direction on whether to move forward with the January 29, 2013 Annual Citizen's Roundtable.
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Scott Aronson, Parking Management Specialist Richard C. Hasko, PE, Director of Environmental Services THROUGH: David T. Harden, City
Manager DATE: March 27, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 9.G. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 REVISED VALET PARKING LICENSE AGREEMENTS ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Approval of the revised
Valet Parking License Agreements in accordance with City Commission direction provided to Staff. BACKGROUND At the December 6, 2011 City Commission meeting, a concern was raised that
the City was not maximizing revenue generated through the leasing of public parking spaces to provide Valet Parking services. Staff was directed to provide options to increase revenue,
which were presented at the March 15, 2012 workshop. Consensus found the current program to be as successful as when first created to provide an appreciated amenity rather than operating
as a profit center. Deliberations then focused on potential modifications provided by staff and stakeholders, and recommendations included in the parking study. Changes in the proposed
agreement, drafted in accordance with direction from the March 15, 2012 meeting, (see attached), are summarized below. It is noted that staff took this opportunity to correct minor scrivener's
errors. Sec. 2) Valet signage must include "OPEN TO THE PUBLIC" Sec. 4 and 9) The agreements have been extended to 3-year terms, with 3% annual increases. As fees remain unchanged for
3-years, Staff recommends a 5% increase upon entering into the approved agreement. Verbiage addressing the potential increase in fees to capture lost revenue if metering is instituted
is also included. Sec. 8) Uniform shirts must display "VALET", have collars and be light in color to provide safety while working in the right-of-way after dark. Clarification is needed
with regard to the pricing of spaces. Early in the deliberations a statement was made that valet queue spaces west of the Intracoastal Waterway, currently $100 per space per month, should
be the same price as those east of the ICW, currently $125. Further discussion suggested modest increases in an effort to maintain low prices for customers. The $25 increase required
west of the Intracoastal to create parity would be counterproductive to that effort. Consequently, staff's
recommendations do not include the creation of this parity. In addition to the items discussed at the workshop, staff is providing additional recommendations for your consideration.
It is noted that the timing of the workshop allowed for the inclusion of input from the Parking Management Advisory Board as is outlined under "Review by Others". Staff recommends: A.
Valet service must be provided throughout the year to assure service is consistently available to customers of area B. Queues should be staffed by a minimum of two (2) employees, with
one stationed at the valet queue at all times, to assure the smooth flow of traffic in the queue and to prevent illegal parking in the queue which may result in a citation being issued
and/or vehicle being towed, and C. Parking lot(s) required for the storage of vehicles must be in the name of the licensee to assure continued compliance with the agreement if a change
in valet operators is needed. REVIEW BY OTHERS The Parking Management Advisory Board, at its meeting of March 27, 2012 recommended of the following: > All signage must include "OPEN
TO THE PUBLIC"; > Uniform shirts to display "VALET" on the back and LICENSEE name and/or logo on front, left upper torso, providing the appropriate party to contact for service related
issues; > Shirts with collars, light in color for safety working in the right-of-way after dark; > Annual 3% increases, commencing with the 2013 renewal; > Valet queues must remain operational
all year to provide service, and; > A minimum of one (1) parking lot lease, required for the storage of vehicles, must be in the name of the LICENSEE to provide continued service if
replacement of their valet company becomes necessary. The PMAB did not recommend approval of the following recommendations: * Valet company name and/or logo on the front of shirt * The
proposed 5% increase failed to pass in a 3-3 vote (Marincola and Gergen recused themselves from this financial aspect of the Board's action), and * Did not agree with the 2-person minimum
staffing level. RECOMMENDATION By motion, recommend approval of the modifications contained in the proposed Valet Parking License Agreements, with further revision to include items A,
B, and C as identified under "Background" above.
:!11!1?L*M@ VVV VVVVVVVVVVV" "!1</<) ))?L1<M@ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII )?Q!Q@%31!!1*3!!4 )")").)1 1).47 3! ).)1<4!>1<%31/ *?A%@1 1" ) !".! )"!(%#(''"# (",*)") !"1
")%%'E"#6955,%*1<!!>1VVV?O@).) VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV1).4%*).)" 1).4 "!8()%%(%% $ ?D@ )!.@%!.! 1).4"1" )1? 1<J, @ )1!"1 %= "14" "1< )1 ?@ P!!%*! JJN)!C!""14")!11 "!%1
)L;+/#*;*&/+3<=MM1 M%!" ))1 "%* ?@)1 11). 4 )!))"! %94 "!") )G "!!%
%'E"#6("#,;6'#,%!! )!).1<! ,,).)%!!!)1 1<!! ?@)1).?@%*)1?@)! ).?@%!)1 1<!)1 )/>"%!!11) !. ".1!!)").%* ")1 )><! )41<%)! !""<%:%+#'+.N$)%!)1<;& 1 ?A8%@))).4)G !=9! ?A%8@=9!"%*"
"U%8U!" %=< 4!" ))%8%K"5'"&1).> ?A%@%> A8%" 1). >?:@!!! >!?@!!%J)") ) 1 %*"1 "8U)1> 1 ?A8%@%/> > 1 %'%"&"#'6',%J)1 1 )!"""!(@#"# !(,*"").)")>14"1%=))1 ")")1 %"@/"##("#"#(#"""!
>)! 14) )1).?@ ! !>1 K
1%="> 4>))"4?%%< )""4"8U%< )!"""4U@@5#'6'*< )""!)1 1 ).%D%!"6#6%*1<)1).4)!1). G %$ !" " 111% 1!"! )" "P %@%'"("#6",+( ) )"?M@ %C%!'$"(QD5"#*!J!).1")1 . !.)")1 11 . ) ) !%))1 )LJ</*M
".M". 1)))%)) %$ 1 ")1" .%B%1'#&#%*"%! !"1<%* )1)! " 4*, )"4 " 1"%")1 1 ?@ !") !4 )1 %%$(B<%*>1< "1. "1<!! !))1 !13%$%!*1"1! %!")1 ! )%%"#(!-<!%!) !
).> %!.! "). 1!") %@"#'E"#6*<=/#$//.! )) ).) )."E " ).1!1 ))) "%")1 1"") "1 )! "%1).))%%"(%#4 ")1 )"! (*=*6(1 *%& #%9%1 :::*<=/#$//(VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV%#,5'#(!)1 1<11 )" />"!%*" %:%#&#" "("#%= )*?A%@)!".! !) 1< *<)E )) ").)4" )).)4"!)1 ")" E !" >) " " %=11<" ) !"!
)!) 1< ) P "1<
! ))%8%1-"'&'",#!>)) "))) )1)1 ) 1 "" )))11 )"1)%'%#", '""#,;1'"#"#%+!") )!(?@J).,,)").)7 ?@J). ).47 ?@/>) ).4%*) "11!(15! 1,A 1,A8:1,*<#1!"!"+))1 !"!!)%.)!?@ )!%!.! !1! 1<>1<!%!!)!P))
)").)4!"E %D%1K,%!) )!! >1 " )>>))> >") %C%,,"6##*" !>)!1<!1<! %B%/5'-',,5'#(,%*)> 1
!"11 )%%)"#&"#6 (% )1"" )" """) )1)1 ) %%#"'6'#*)!)"E%) "!)!) ! )>) %
%#&#,%*" )>)"! > ")%31!!3/)1 " > "VVVVV VVVVVVVVVVV%11</<)**/$*( ))VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV(VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV.#$%))1 (VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV!(VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVV?;+;*/$/<@#+ (VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV*(VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV!11/VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV01</VVVVVVVVVVVVVV*!.! "VVVVV VVVVVVVVVVVV"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII=@VVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV?).! @VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV?))@)")%&$).!) VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV?) @ %VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV$#+"5$
H)1!0901!/9.P))$$ /)P<"=!AA8A%0<"=A" )).E)? @ ))!1 ) !!.%*))1 1)) " ) " ") ) )%02)=!A')!A8%:"<"A" )! ,! " !"%8* 113!" ")7 " %'*?@ !4 %DP ZJ===" %
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Catherine M. Kozol, Asst. City Attorney/Police Legal Advisor THROUGH: City Attorney DATE: March 27, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 9.H. -REGULAR
COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 OFFER OF SETTLEMENT IN VINCENT GRAY V. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH AND RALPH PHILLIPS ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION This is an offer of settlement by the plaintiff,
Vincent Gray, in the amount of $175,000.00 in the case of Gray v. City of Delray Beach and Ralph Phillips. BACKGROUND This case arose out of a case involving the City of Delray Beach,
Sergeant Vincent Gray and former Captain Ralph Phillips. Sergeant Gray filed a Whistleblower action against the City. He has offered to settle the case with the City for the sum of $175,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION The City Attorney's Office recommends denial of this offer.
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: March 27, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 9.I. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 APPOINTMENT
TO THE PUBLIC ART ADVISORY BOARD ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION This item is before the City Commission for an appointment to the Public Art Advisory Board. BACKGROUND Mr. Jonathan Jonas, regular
member on the Public Art Advisory Board, submitted his resignation effective immediately. An appointment is needed for one (1) regular member to serve an unexpired term ending July 31,
2013. On February 1, 2005, the Delray Beach City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 77-04 establishing the Public Art Advisory Board for the purpose of advising and making recommendations
to the City Commission with respect to public art policy and related issues including, but not limited to, the selection, construction and placement of public art in/on City right-of-way
and City owned property. The Public Art Advisory Board shall consist of seven (7) members. Three (3) seats on the Board must be filled with either an artist, architect, landscape architect
or engineer. Laypersons of knowledge, experience and judgment who have an interest in public art shall make up the balance of the Board. The following individuals have submitted applications
and would like to be considered for appointment: Alexia Rouquette Real Estate/Marketing/Public Relations Kera Trowbridge Interviewer-Panelist A check for code violations and/or municipal
liens was conducted. None were found. Voter registration verification was completed and all are registered. Based on the rotation system, the appointment will be made by Commissioner
Jacquet (Seat #2) for one (1) regular member to serve an unexpired term ending July 31, 2013. RECOMMENDATION Recommend appointment of one (1) regular member to serve on the Public Art
Advisory Board for an unexpired term ending July 31, 2013.
#(!) *9:/9G:96:9><;:/9/(9:65&&<*5,1HI72I27<#17I01I20'((!51HI72I201HI2BI1@:1HI01I21''&1HI72I27<#1HI72I201HI01I216I:1HI72I201HI2BI1@:1HI01I21/4J!!I1HI72I201HI2BI1@:1HI01I21:/>&991HI72I271HI02I1K:1HI1BI
22//4&3">!GH27L6I&&4I(20I!"(&;3
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: March 27, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 9.J. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 APPOINTMENT
TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION This item is before the City Commision for an appointment to the Neighborhood Advisory Council. BACKGROUND There is a vacancy
on the Neighborhood Advisory Council for a regular member from Zone 2. An appointment is needed for one (1) regular member to serve an unexpired term ending July 31, 2014. The Neighborhood
Advisory Council was established for the purpose of maintaining broad-based community involvement with the residents, creating neighborhood outreach initiatives, enhancing communication,
improving the aesthetics of the neighborhoods and identifying any potential threats to the stability of the neighborhoods. The Council consists of fifteen (15) regular and two (2) student
members. Twelve (12) members are residents with two (2) selected from each of the six neighborhood zones, and three (3) at large representatives, who may be selected from a community
civic organization or business owner located within a neighborhood zone interested in the enhancement of its surrounding neighborhoods. A map of the appointment zones is included for
your review. The following individual has submitted an application for consideration: Colson Zulmar Zone 2 Based on the rotation system, the appointment will be made by Commissioner
Gray (Seat #4) for one (1) regular member from Zone 2 to serve an unexpired term ending July 31, 2014. RECOMMENDATION Recommend an appointment of one (1) regular member to serve on the
Neighborhood Advisory Council for an unexpired term ending July 31, 2014.
;)!<0*#+1HI72I27<#22I2LI21M26!61HI72I2A1KI1LI22M06;1HI72I27<#21I2HI1L:21I2LI1H:21I2KI21M7;;!;"1HI72I2721I2KI21MA6!'!1HI72I2A<#17I17I1@:21I1HI1@:1HI2KI22MB>$;/'1HI72I2A<#10I01I1H:21I1HI1@:1HI2KI22ML;1
HI72I2A1@I10I22M2*'1HI72I2A<#M01HI72I2021I2HI1L:21I1LI1KM761HI72I20<#21I01I1KMA"/41HI72I20<#1@I10I22MB'61HI72I2021I2HI1L:21I1LI1KMLNJ&1HI72I2A<#10I17I1K:1HI2KI22;:C/0&1HI72I2A1@I10I22;:;&1HI72I2021I1
LI1K;:/'1HI72I20<#1AI02I22:1HI2KI226!1HI72I206! #" 1
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: March 27, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 9.K. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 APPOINTMENT
TO THE CHARTER REVISION COMMITTEE ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION The item before Commission is appointment of the Chairperson to the Charter Revision Committee. BACKGROUND At the March 20, 2012
Meeting, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 18-12 establishing the Charter Revision Committee. The sole purpose of the Charter Revision Committee is to review the City's Charter
and formulate recommendations to the City Commission. Once the Commission appoints the membership, the resolution provides that the Charter Revision Committee shall immediately pursue
its assigned task with a target completion date of September 1, 2012. The committee would sunset on the completion of its assignment, unless otherwise extended by action of the City
Commission. Per Resolution No. 18-12, the committee consists of eleven (11) members including a Chairperson. Mayor McDuffie (Seat #5) will appoint the Chairperson. The following nominee
would like to be considered for appointment: Jay Alperin RECOMMENDATION Recommend appointment of the Chairperson to the Charter Revision Committee.
"' *-;<=>K'M Q"**V*XYZX'>"[\*"*']ZX = X^[<_[XV
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: March 27, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 10.A. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 ORDINANCE
NO. 05-12 ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION This ordinance is before Commission for second reading and quasi-judicial hearingto consider a privately-initiated Future Land Use Map change from Transitional
(TRN) to General Commercial (GC), rezoning from POC (Planned Office Center) to PC (Planned Commercial), and a Text Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan modifying the description of the
GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to specify a maximum FAR of 0.46 for a 9.95 acre property located on the southeast corner of Linton Boulevard and Federal Highway
(1801 and 1845 South Federal Highway) known as Delray Place. BACKGROUND At the first reading on March 6, 2012, the Commission passed Ordinance No. 05-12. However, a point was raised
during the Commission's discussion about the importance of the applicant speaking directly with the neighbors. A meeting was held on Thursday, March 15 between the developer, his design
team and several representative of the Tropic Isles Association Board. The meeting highlighted the developer vision for the redevelopment of the property as well as the resident’s concerns
with redevelopment. City staff was also present and they discussed current requirements for compatibility and buffering of adjacent properties and the city development process where
these issues are most appropriately addressed. Commission made a motion to postpone Ordinance No. 05-12 at the public hearing on March 20, 2012 to April 3, 2012. The motion was approved
4-1; Commissioner Frankel dissenting. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 05-12 on second and final reading.
5:',,&9,51B$20,5:',,&95*-9&*=&5//665,5*-9&*=5'9;:=(9&-;5:''5*,>6/;;$6&;9&5/:9-9,69;,/9,'/9,*<:6<,**5*-9:565,65*-9+&5//<,*=;,,,>&*.;5:'6**<*9669&*5,2L772@H,&;<',>6/;;$6&;9<*<:9;,'<69//9,'/9,*:5/*:,*:,
6*5,;*5>&>9,9:;&5//9:&;5:;,';5&*9'**-965<*-96*&5:,9:5;,*5,(5<;9:','65<*-9'9:;->-C=6/5:9:*&<;:;='96&:(9'-9:9,,',665&*9'*9G*/9,'/9,*/5'=,>*-9'96&:*5,5*-9>&>9,9:;&5//9:&;<*<:9;,'<69'96>,*5,9:*,,>*56';,'
%,':9M5,,>,';&,>6';,':969,*;=M5,9'5&;,,9'5&9&9,*9:*5&;,,9'&5//9:&;'6*:&*%/9,',>OM5,,>/5'9;:=(9&-;5:'N,<:=0120O%:5',>>9,9:;:99;9:&;<696,>&;<69,',99&*9'*9C-9:96&'(#!!!6!62L772L2!2L770A@!4O&!O%C-9:965,@
0$@K&&!O&$'(O%C-9:96';;&KKB!;(!6!-%C-9:96!" "#!!;</;</*:,*%C-9:968!!!;</*:,*>&>&%C-9:96';;&8!>&!!;<9!;(!6!-%C-9:96"M'/&'(N!0120"5&5&'%C-9:96"!0H0120M(&'(;!"B18!""!!4%
;#;%8,C-9:96!!6!2L772HAAM(;!" &%C-9:96&&&'(M6:%C-9:96&&&'(&%C-9:96M'/&'(",5C*-9:95:9(9*5:',9'(=*-9&*=&5//665,5*-9&*=5'9;:=(9&-;5:'65;;5C6362*"60*!!;</!" "#>&>&67*&&&'("#!!!6!62L772L2!2L770A@!4O&!O6A*
!!;<9&&'(""">&;<3%,-.//,-.0*!"!;!!!"""!"-'#-,92A6&#!:71!#3!&5'$#$!:016*&!5'$,:1HB
;#;%8,;'5'$,:17LC5'$,:270'5'$,:1AL:!!2BP>&;<:! !!!!" &<:#!20!#:QL;I-"!#!2L!!" &<!:6*&!5'"!#!00!!" &<>&4!#20!!#!71!!&5'2@!4!"""!!4!!6B*M'/&'(""&&'"35-"5(4(4A0L2!":(&!;9#"2175*4(&!(&!&!&!!&,1&;KK$00K,/
712KKK5:(42212L00L"!"360@*AL6!:A79(&!"!"3*5-"5(4(4A0L2!":(&!"!"3(,%,@KRAH)BH.9,"!0B11%6!BHR0L)AB.CA00AC"!!!"6!LBR2H)A0.9%,C"!!!
:;#;%8,2@B11@11RAH)0H.0B11"*(5-"5(4(4A0L0!":(&!6L*M'&!M/&'(6B6H*""6@*!""! !"!"6K*"3$72!&5"!"6;&",!"!""!"&""!!!"669',''5*9'!DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD0120DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD**96*/=5:DDD
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD&&4:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD6:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Estelio Breto, Senior Planner Paul Dorling, AICP, Director of Planning and Zoning THROUGH: City Manager DATE: February 29, 2012 SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM 12.A. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 6, 2012 ORDINANCE NO. 05-12 ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Consideration of a privately sponsored Future Land Use Map change from Transitional
(TRN) to General Commercial (GC), rezoning from POC (Planned Office Center) to PC (Planned Commercial), and Text Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan modifying the description of the
GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify a maximum FAR of 0.46 for a 9.95 acre property located on the southeast comer of Linton Boulevard and Federal Highway
(1801 and 1845 South Federal Highway). BACKGROUND The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Linton Boulevard and Federal Highway and is approximately 9.95 acres in size.
The property is known as the Old Harbor Office and Bank Facility and it is currently occupied by three office buildings: two multiple-story office buildings (one located to the north
of the property and the other to the south), and a one-story multiple tenant office building located to the east side of the property along Linton Boulevard. The property was originally
annexed into the City of Delray Beach from unincorporated Palm Beach County in the late 1970's. The property was assigned the Future Land Use Map designation of Transitional (TRN) and
a zoning of SAD (Special Activities District) and it was developed with three office buildings and associated parking simultaneously with the annexation. In 1991, the City of Delray
Beach adopted new Land Development Regulations and the property was assigned the new zoning designation of POC (Planned Office Center) and retained the Future Land Use Map Designation
of TRN (Transitional). The requested Future Land Use Map designation from Transitional (TRN) to General Commercial (GC) and rezoning from Planned Office Center (POC) to Planned Commercial
(PC), for the subject property is to allow greater development flexibility on the property including the future potential of a Multiple Building Commercial Development. The proposal
also includes a privately-initiated amendment to the Text of the Comprehensive Plan modifying the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to limit the
maximum intensities (FAR’s) for Delray Place. The maximum Coversheet Page 1 of 2 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=5405&MeetingID=346 3/7/2012
intensity will be reduced from a FAR (Floor Area Ratio) of 3.0 to 0.46 to assure any resulting development will meet traffic concurrency. REVIEW BY OTHERS At its meeting of February
27, 2012, the Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing associated with the GC Future Land Use Map amendment, PC rezoning request, and Text Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan
modifying the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify a maximum FAR of 0.46 for the subject property. The Board had concerns which centered
more around issues relating to site plan approval and not the broader issues relating to whether the proposed Land Use and Zoning designations are appropriate. These concerns included
the width of the buffer that separates the subject property from the residential development to the south and east. The public expressed concerns over how the rezoning proposal fits
into the South Federal Highway Redevelopment plan which is underway. The public also had concerns regarding the increase in traffic and noise with a new development, the potential diminishment
of property values, compatibility with existing developments in the neighborhood, etc. After an intense discussion, the Board recommended denial of the proposed FLUM, Rezoning and Text
Amendment on a 5-0 vote. RECOMMENDATION Approve on first reading Ordinance 05-12 for a Future Land Use Map amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial), Rezoning from
POC (Planned Commercial) to PC (Planned Commercial) and the Text Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan modifying the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use Map designation
to reduce the maximum FAR to 0.46 for Delray Place, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan and does meet the criteria set forth in LDR Sections 3.1.1 (Required Findings), 3.2.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions), 2.4.5(D)(5) (Rezoning Findings). Coversheet
Page 2 of 2 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=5405&MeetingID=346 3/7/2012
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT---MEETING DATE: February 27, 2012 ITEM: V. A. Privately-initiated amendment to the Text of the Comprehensive Plan modifying
the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify specific uses and intensities (FAR’s) for Delray Place, located at the southeast corner of Linton
Boulevard and South Federal Highway; and associated Small-Scale Future Land Use Map amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial); and Rezoning from POC (Planned Office
Center) to PC (Planned Commercial) for said property. Quasi-Judicial Hearing. GENERAL DATA: Agent…………………............... Covelli Design Associates, Inc. Location......................................
Southeast comer of Linton Boulevard and Federal Highway (1801 and 1845 South Federal Highway) Property Size.............................. 9.94 acres Existing FLUM...........................
TRN (Transitional) Proposed FLUM......................... GC (General Commercial) Current Zoning............................ POC (Planned Office Center) Proposed Zoning........................
PC (Planned Commercial Adjacent Zoning................North: PC (Planned Commercial) and RM (Multiple Family Residential -Medium Density) East: R-1-AA-B (Single Family Residential) And
CD (Conservation District) South: PC (Planned Commercial); RM (Multiple Family Residential-Medium Density); R-1-AA-B (Single Family Residential. West: PC (Planned Commercial) Existing
Land Use...................... Old Harbor Office and Bank Facility Proposed Land Use.................... Multiple building commercial development Water Service…………………… Available via
connection to a 12” water main located on the east side of S. Federal Hwy., a 10” water main on Eve Street, and a 6” water main on the south side of Linton Boulevard. Sewer Service……………………
Available via connection to a 8” sewer main located on Eve Street.
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: March 28, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 10.B. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 ORDINANCE
NO. 09-12 ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION This ordinance is before Commission for second readingto consider a city-initiated amendment to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Appendix “A”, “Definitions”,
to expand the definition of “Restaurant (Bona Fide)”, to clarify required operations and components for restaurant uses. BACKGROUND At the first reading on March 20, 2012, the Commission
passed Ordinance No. 09-12. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 09-12 on second and final reading.
5:',,&9,51K$20,5:',,&95*-9&*=&5//665,5*-9&*=5'9;:=(9&-;5:'/9,',>*-9;,''99;5/9,*:9><;*5,65*-9&5'955:',,&96(=/9,',>9,'GOOO'9,*5,6O*59G,'*-9'9,*5,5+:96*<:,*(5,'9.*5&;:=:9?<:9'59:*5,6,'&5/5,9,*65::96*<:,
*<696:5',>>9,9:;:99;9:&;<696,>&;<69,',99&*9'*9C-9:96!!;':!622LM(#!""!0H0120A1"%C-9:96!!6!2L772HAAM(;!" &%C-9:96&&&'(M6:%C-9:96&&&'(&,5C*-9:95:9(9*5:',9'(=*-9&*=&5//665,5*-9&*=5'9;:=(9&-;5:'65;;5C6362
*"60*;':!&5&'(#OOO'O"""+:!(.3:96*<:,*(5,'9"!"""""!!"!32"!!!!!!!%!!!"S0"!!!4!!!!"!!!!
;#;%B,7"!!!"!!*"!!!!"8!!!"!"!!!!%""!!A"!!"!!!!!"""!!3*!""!!"!!"!#!!!%"*!!"(!&!B"!!!"!!8!"!8!8!+".!!6!7@L017228!"!L6!!!""""67*""6A*!""! !"!"6B*"!669',''5*9'!DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD0120DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD**96*/=5:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD&&4:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD6:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: MARK MCDONNELL, AICP, ASST. DIRECTOR PLANNING AND ZONING PAUL DORLING, AICP, DIRECTOR PLANNING AND ZONING THROUGH: CITY MANAGER DATE:
March 14, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 12.A. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 20, 2012 ORDINANCE NO. 09-12 ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Approval of a city-initiated amendment to the Land
Development Regulations (LDRs) that will expand the definition of “Restaurant”. BACKGROUND Over the last several years, the City has become increasingly aware that some establishments
in the downtown area that are approved as restaurants transform into stand-alone bars and nightclubs after a certain hour of the evening. When this occurs, the uses are in violation
because they either become stand-alone bars for which they are not approved, and/or they fail to satisfy the requirements for operation as a restaurant. To help remedy this situation
and to make the Land Development Regulations even more clear, the current definition of restaurant is being expanded. To avoid such establishments from becoming dance clubs, language
is added that requires that all tables, chairs and counter areas are to remain available for full course meal service during all hours of operation. New language is added that states
that “stand alone bar facilities serving food” do not qualify as bona fide restaurants. Finally, the definition is strengthened to require that service of full course meals must be available
at all times that alcoholic beverages are being served. REVIEW BY OTHERS The Pineapple Grove Main Street Committee reviewed the item at their March 7, 2012 meeting and recommended approval,
subject to adding language that would allow restaurants to move some tables to provide space for entertainment venues (i.e., bands, music, etc.) The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed
the item at their February 27, 2012 meeting and recommended approval on a 4-0 vote. Coversheet Page 1 of 2 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=5447&MeetingID=348 3/28/2012
RECOMMENDATION By motion, approve Ordinance No. 09-12 on first reading for a city-initiated amendment to the Land Development Regulations, Appendix A, “Definitions”, to Clarify Required
Operations and Components for Restaurant Uses, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.5(M) of the Land Development Regulations. Coversheet Page 2 of 2 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=5447&MeetingID=348
3/28/2012
" @ " -L -9 -*9" BD ""=>?=">?!!!!!#%!!!#!*!#*- !#!#!!#!"!!!JN&!>#!#!/!:()!+(+(L'!#!!!>!#!"!!!*!#!!!#!#!)#^#(A 7"!!!"!*!'!*!!!*&!!!!!#&&!!"!#!#-!#!!!!"!(=!'!!!"!!!*!!!!#-!&!*!"!#'#6!**!!P!!!!(!!!#*#%!
!#!"!!!!"!!!'!!#!!!!>#!#("#!!!#!'!##!#!P!!'#!!!!"!!!!"!#!(!&!##!#!/#!!!"#:#P*#!!(E*'!#!!!!#!P!!"!!!!"!!!"!!!!!"!#(8 /52.$E"(22'/2!8(3(KJGNJKNJE#N!P!!*%!#!!>!#!!&#!!D'$!"!#)!!!!"!)(=!!!&!!!!!!!"!)!!#!
#!'!&!!!"!)(
)#^#!E!*8<'84+8!/!:8 9!!32%32E(5/2%0%$%&BD!"!&!#!!!E!*+5'84+8!!#!!#"&#!'!!#!!##!#!!%!!#!(!!.%%(2%$,E(5/2%($%$2B!D!"!&!#!!!E!*+3'84+8!!#!!#"&#!(!//02$%&,E(5/2%42&BD!"!&!#!!!E!*85'84+8!!#!!##!&#!(!#!!#
!!#"!&*!#!!!"!'#!!*#!6'#!"!(!"$255( E$2%%B" D!!&!"!&!!!G<'84+8!!#!!!#&!&#!#!*(0%.&%$.!*!&!!"#!#!&!&!#"Q!##"*!!*!!$!#'*'&!"#!#!)#^#!!(!!#!#!&!!*!!P!#!#!!P*!(#!!"!"!!!!!"!(9(!&#!((G"!!!#"!*!!#!#!"!!!'5
52,$H>'$2$%$2.?%($'&:0$,5%$2.2,/522%.'.%02%..*#!##&!#!!'##!!>!#!#"!!!&!!!"!)#!!!!!!8(3(KJGN(G"!!!##!!*!!#!#!"!!!'552,$H>'$2$%$2.?%($'&:0$,5%$2.2,/522%.'.%02%..*#!##&!#!!'##!!>!#!#"!!!&!!!"!)##!!!!!!!
8(3(KJGNJ
)#^#!E!*8<'84+8!/!:5 !!#"!!#!#!"!!!'552,$H>'$2$%$2.?%($'&:0$,5%$2.2,/522%.'.%02%..*#!##&!#!!'##!!>!#!#"!!!&!!!"!)#!!!!!!8(3(KJGN(!Q!
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: March 28, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 10.C. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 ORDINANCE
NO.10-12 ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION This ordinance is before Commission for second reading to consider a city-initiated amendment to the Land Development Regulations (LDR) Appendix “A”,
“Definitions”, to provide a definition of “Delicatessen”, Section 4.6.9, “Off-Street Parking Regulations”, and Article 6.3, “Use and Work in the Public Right of Way”, Subsection 6.3.3,
“Sidewalk Café”, to provide a definition, clarify required parking, and to clarify the characteristics of a Delicatessen. BACKGROUND At the first reading on March 20, 2012, the Commission
passed Ordinance No. 10-12. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 10-12 on second and final reading.
5:',,&9,521$20,5:',,&95*-9&*=&5//665,5*-9&*=5'9;:=(9&-;5:'/9,',>*-9;,''99;5/9,*:9><;*5,65*-9&5'955:',,&96(=/9,',>9,'G+.+'9,*5,6.(=9,&*,>,9C'9,*5,5+'9;&*9669,.%(=/9,',>ALK+5$ 6*:99*:J,>:9><;*5,6.6<(69
&*5,&7'+:96*<:,*6.%,'69&*5,L77+:9><;*5,6>59:,,>*-9<69'96>,,'/,*9,,&956'9C;J&T.*5&;:=:J,>:9?<:9/9,*6,'6'9C;J&T&5/5,9,*65:'9;&*9669,6,'6/;:<696%:5',>6,>&;<69>9,9:;:99;9:&;<69,',99&*9'*9C-9:96!!;':622LM
(#!""!0H0120A1"%C-9:96!!6!2L772HAAM(;!" &%C-9:96&&&'(M6:%C-9:96&&&'(&,5C*-9:95:9(9*5:',9'(=*-9&*=&5//665,5*-9&*=5'9;:=(9&-;5:'65;;5C6362*"60*;':!&5&'(#OOO'O"""+'.3''"!!"$!"!#!!4*
;%#;%,"!'(!:!$"67*6ALK+5$64.6!"+ALK&+,!"46:8!.6!"$6!"ALK&7+:8!&<.+:!.;':!&5&'(""31-2,-13!$$!4!"!2021118!!L11182B21118L1118!!"!"!8!4S"!48!!!""!!48!6A*6L77+<C4!":C.6!"+L77+64&S.+:!><'/64&S.;':!&5&'(""3
32.-1%4,35113-6--7-68-.9-7324"" !"!"!!"#3!!"!"!"!"!"!""4S04"""! "!!" "!!"! "!4*4S"" $4!""4S 4S" 4"!"40)!!"*0)"4" 47""!4A*!"4"!"!4*"!""" 4S"8!4"!
;%#;%,!!8!!"!"&64&SB64S!B)*B)"IB) !"!"!!4SB)"!UB)"!!8!!"8!B)"8!4 L+,*"M."",4S""+,*"M.*+,*"M.!2B)#!"*2B)"!!#!"$!+,*"M."!"H*4S"""!"#!",""8!B)!"B"@!"!43!!"#8!78"" #B)!"##8!0#7;!"!"*" !""!4S*8!!6:(#8!&V"
""#6ALH97>5"6K<I!4!!!!4421"""""I!"!48!!"48!"!8!4S"4$!"""%I*!"4S
:;%#;%,22*!!4!"4S204S!4S8!B)27-!""!2A*"!4!"! """"!"!!*""!4!4S48!4!"!" 4S!2B,"4"##!!"46B*!""! !"!"6L*""6H*"!669',''5*9'!DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD0120DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD**96*/=5:DDDDDDD
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD&&4:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD6:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: MARK MCDONNELL, AICP, ASST. DIRECTOR PLANNING AND ZONING PAUL DORLING, AICP, DIRECTOR PLANNING AND ZONING THROUGH: CITY MANAGER DATE:
March 14, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 12.B. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 20, 2012 ORDINANCE NO. 10-12 ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Approval of a city-initiated amendment to the Land
Development Regulations (LDRs) that will clarify parking requirements for delicatessen and similar uses, identify how sidewalk café components can be utilized for these uses, and to
provide a new definition for delicatessen. BACKGROUND The primary purpose of this amendment is to clarify parking requirements for delis, sandwich shops, coffee shops, and sub shops,
and to identify how sidewalk café components can be utilized for these uses, and to provide a new definition for delicatessen. An additional change is included to clarify where sidewalk
cafés can be established by modifying the current reference from “public space” to “in front of public open space plazas adjacent to the business”. Delicatessen uses, along with ice
cream stores, sandwich shops, sub shops, coffee shops, and other similar uses with no indoor seating are considered ‘take-out only’ facilities and are assessed a general commercial parking
requirement. If these uses have indoor seating, they are more akin to restaurant uses and the restaurant parking requirement is applied. These take-out uses are allowed to have sidewalk
cafés where take-out products could be consumed. Additional clarification is provided in the sidewalk café section of the LDRs that limit sidewalk café operations for take-out facilities
to take-out food only. Waiter/waitress service to tables is only allowed for restaurants or facilities which have been assessed restaurant parking requirements. The amendment also modifies
the reference to “open space” in the sidewalk café regulations to reflect “public open space plazas”. Finally, a definition for Delicatessen is provided to further help regulate and
provide a distinction from restaurant uses. Coversheet Page 1 of 2 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=5448&MeetingID=348 3/28/2012
REVIEW BY OTHERS The Pineapple Grove Main Street Committee reviewed the item at their March 7, 2012 meeting and recommended approval. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the item
at their February 27, 2012 meeting and a recommendation for approval on a 4-0 vote was made. RECOMMENDATION By motion, approve Ordinance No. 10-12 on first reading for a city-initiated
amendment to the Land Development Regulations, Appendix “A”, “Definitions” By Enacting A New Definition Of “Delicatessen”; By Amending 4.6.9, “Off-Street Parking Regulations”, Subsection
(C)(3)(D), “Restaurants”; And Section 6.3.3(F), “Regulations Governing The Use, Design, And Maintenance Of A Sidewalk Café”, To Clarify Parking Requirements And Sidewalk Café Components
For Delicatessens And Similar Uses , by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and
meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.5 (M) of the Land Development Regulations. Coversheet Page 2 of 2 http://itwebapp/AgendaIntranet/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=5448&MeetingID=348 3/28/2012
+" @ " -L -9 -*9" BD ""=>?"9>?+K>*"A ?+C>!A" !?+CC>!AM?8"A !!!!!#%!!!#!*!#*- !#!#!!#!"!!!JN&*%!P!!#!!!#!'##!*&#!&%d!!\!#!!!'#"#!!&#!#!!!()!+(+(L'!#!!!>!#!"!!!*!#!!!#!#!)#^#(A 7!*!!#!*%!P!!#!'#&'!!'#
'##!*&#!&%d!!\!#!!!'#"#!!&#!#!!!(##!#!#*#!&%d!!!#!!#!#!!!#$!!!!\J(!('!!!!!/!:!#!#!#/!!\:N(#!!!!'&!!!'#&''!!'#!!&#!!#!!#f%!-*U!#!!!#!!!%!P!!(!!!"!#!'!*!!%!!#!!%!P!!!#(!!%!-!!&!#"!#!&%d&!!%!-##!!#(##"#
!#!#!&%d!!#!&%d!%!-!%!-#*(=!!"!!*&!#!!&"!!!!!#!%!P!!(!!#!!#!&%d&!#!#$!!#!!!!!!!!!\!J%!=)%N&!!!&*!"!#(
)#^#!E!*8<'84+8!!!8E*'#!!!!"#!#!!!!#"#!#!!(8 /52.$E"(22'/2!8(3(KJGNJKNJE#N!P!!*%!#!!>!#!!&#!!D'$!"!#)!!!!"!)(=!!!&!!!!!!!"!)!!#!#!'!&!!!"!)(9!!32%32E(5/2%0%$%&BD!"!&!#!!!E!*+5'84+8!!#!!#"&#!'!!#!!##!
#!#!%!#/%!-:&!(!!.%%(2%$,E(5/2%($%$2B!D!"!&!#!!!E!*+3'84+8!!#!!#"&#!'&!!!!/#!!!:!!#'#&!!!#%!/#!:!#!#!!(!//02$%&,E(5/2%42&BD!"!&!#!!!E!*85'84+8!!#!&!!#!!#"(!"$255( E$2%%B" D!!&!"!&!!!G<'84+8!!#!!!#&!!
!#!*!!(0%.&%$.!*!&!!"#!#!&!&!#"Q!##"*!!*!!$!#'*'&!"#!#!)#^#!!(!!##!&"#!#!&!!!##!!!&&!!!!'&!!%!'#*!\!!##!&%d!(9(!&#!((G"!!!#"!*!!#!#!"!!!'552,$H'$2$%$2.%5E$,,'$2$%$2'($%..2
)#^#!E!*8<'84+8!!!5%$2+K>''*.$%"1$2440(%$2.?2,06.%$2+CC>$,3(1'N?*#!##&!#!!'##!!>!#!#"!!!&!!!"!)#!!!!!!8(3(KJGN(G"!!!##!!*!!#!#!"!!!'552,$H'$2$%$2.%5E$,,'$2$%$2'($%..2%$2+K>''*.$%"1$2440(%$2.?2,06.%$2
+CC>$,3(1'N?*#!##&!#!!'##!!>!#!#"!!!&!!!"!)##!!!!!!!8(3(KJGNJ!!#"!!#!#!"!!!'552,$H'$2$%$2.%5E$,,'$2$%$2'($%..2%$2+K>''*.$%"1$2440(%$2.?2,06.%$2+CC>$,3(1'N?*#!##&!#!!'##!!>!#!#"!!!&!!!"!)#!!!!!!8(3(KJ
GN(!Q!
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Ronald Hoggard, AICP, Principal Planner Paul Dorling, AICP, Director Planning and Zoning THROUGH: City Manager DATE: March 26, 2012
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 12.A. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012 ORDINANCE NO. 14-12 ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Consideration of a privately-initiated small-scale Comprehensive Plan
amendment and rezoning for the proposed 10th & 10th Center, located at the southeast corner of SW 10th Street and SW 10th Avenue. The small-scale Comprehensive Plan amendment consists
of a Future Land Use Map change from CMR (Commerce) to TRN (Transitional) and an associated Text Amendment modifying the description of the Transitional Land Use designation within the
Future Land Use Element to restrict the use on the property to nonresidential development at a maximum FAR of 0.25. The associated rezoning will change the property from LI (Light Industrial)
to NC (Neighborhood Commercial). BACKGROUND The subject property is located at the southeast corner of SW 10th Street and SW 10th Avenue, and is approximately 1.49 acres in size. This
property and the surrounding area are located within the Wallace Drive Industrial Area, which is subject to the “Wallace Drive Redevelopment Plan”, adopted by the City Commission on
January 6, 2004. The Plan encourages the development of light industrial, limited commercial and office uses in an urban setting. The Plan recommended a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment
and rezoning for the subject property from Redevelopment Area #2 (RDA-2) to Commerce (CMR) and from Single-Family Residential (R-1-A) to Light Industrial (LI), respectively. The recommended
FLUM amendment and rezoning were approved by the City Commission on January 6, 2004. The requested Future Land Use Map amendment from CMR (Commerce) to TRN (Transitional) and rezoning
from Light Industrial (LI) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) is to allow development of a neighborhood commercial center at this location. The applicant’s justification for these modifications
is that there have been changes in industrial market conditions since adoption of the Wallace Drive Plan in 2004 which make additional industrial development impractical; and that there
has been an increase in residential development in the immediate area that has resulted in increased demand for neighborhood retail and services uses. Staff agrees that there have been
changes in industrial market conditions since 2004 and that this is the
result of the current economic downturn. Staff does not agree that the current economic conditions represent a necessity to change long-range future land use provisions for the City.
There was no timeline associated with the redevelopment effort given in the Redevelopment Plan. Redevelopment will not occur until opportunities arise on individual properties and market
conditions support those opportunities. The City’s only has 374 acres of land within the Industrial Land Use categories of IND (Industrial) and CMR (Commerce). This represent only 3.7%
of the City’s developable land area. The applicant’s justification statement included data that the City of Boca Raton reduced its light industrial land use by 25% between 1989 and 2005.
It is significant to note that Boca Raton’s 2005 figure of 6.45% is still 75% higher than the City’s 3.7% figure. It is also important to note that the City reduced the amount of industrial
land use in 2006 with creation of the MROC zoning district along the Congress Avenue corridor. This new zoning district eliminated industrial zoning in favor of a mixed residential,
office and commercial zoning to encourage mixed use development with commercial or office on the ground floor and residential above utilizing new urbanism design elements. Staff’s position
is supported by the Palm Beach County Light Industrial Land Use Study “Whitepaper” and “Land Use Toolkit”, prepared by Swiger Consulting in December 2007, which recommends the retention
of Industrial properties. Further reduction of the City’s industrial base is unwarranted at this time and should be discouraged. The current Future Land Use Map designation of Commerce,
along with the existing Light Industrial zoning is flexible enough to allow considerable development opportunities for the subject property as the economy improves. The allowed principal
uses include “research and development”; “Wholesaling, Storage and Distribution”; “Manufacturing and Assembly”; “Office”; and “Repair”. It also allows limited retail for items processed
on the premises. In terms of increased demand from the additional residential development in the area, staff notes that while more than 445 additional residential multifamily units have
been approved and some of the units built within the area north of SW 10th Street, this area was zoned for multiple family development prior to adoption of the Wallace Drive Redevelopment
Plan in 2004. In terms of long-range planning, the construction of these anticipated units does not really represent a change in circumstances. The applicant’s property is located 0.45
miles from the Villages at Delray/Village Square developments. The convenience shopping needs of these residents are currently being met by two convenience stores --the ABC Mini Mart,
located at the southwest corner of SW 10th Street and SW 10th Avenue and the Valero gas station/convenience store, located in the Sherwood Park Plaza at the southeast corner of SW 10th
Street and Congress Avenue. Sherwood Park Plaza is the closest neighborhood service/retail shopping center, and is the same distance away from the new residential units as the subject
property. At one time, this center even had a Dollar General Store, but it has since been closed. Over 7,000 square feet of space is currently vacant at this center. Major shopping/services
are also available on Linton Boulevard at Linton Square Plaza, 0.9 miles away, Linton Center, 1.2 miles away, and The Plaza at Delray, 1.8 miles away. Finally, downtown Delray Beach,
with a wide range of specialty shops, is 1.7 miles away. For the reasons outlined above, staff feels that the changed conditions are not sufficient to warrant approval of the proposed
FLUM modification, which will reduce the amount of land in the Commerce FLUM designation. This reduction is in direct conflict with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.3, which says that
such reductions should be discouraged. The applicant’s proposal also includes an associated text amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan modifying the description
of the Transitional Future Land Use Map designation to limit development of the subject property to nonresidential uses at a maximum FAR (Floor Area Ratio) of 0.25. This text amendment
will reduce the maximum potential traffic impact of a 100% retail development to a level less than or equal to that which could be realized by a mixed office/retail development under
the existing Commerce FLUM designation at its maximum FAR of 0.60. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 1.0 is currently permitted for nonresidential uses in the Transitional
designation. If the FLUM amendment and rezoning are supported by the City Commission, then the text amendment should also be supported. Since the proposed FLUM amendment and rezoning
are not consistent with recommendations in the adopted Wallace Drive Redevelopment Plan, the applicant is seeking a concurrent amendment of the Redevelopment Plan to address the conflicts.
This modification, which is being processed concurrently, will be scheduled for City Commission action at the same meeting as the second reading of Ordinance 14-12. REVIEW BY OTHERS
At its meeting of March 19, 2012, the Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing associated with the small-scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment, including a Future Land Use Map amendment
from CMR (Commerce) to TRN (Transitional) and an associated text amendment; rezoning from LI (Light Industrial) to NC (Neighborhood Commercial); and modification of the Wallace Drive
Redevelopment Plan. Staff presented its analysis of the applicant’s justification for the proposed changes and recommended that the Board move a recommendation of denial based on a failure
to make positive findings related to “Demonstration of Need” and consistency with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Note: the complete analysis of applicant’s
justification is included in the attached Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report. The applicant made a presentation in support of the changes and stated that there is not a current market
for light industrial development; that the future market for the light industrial development will be limited; and that this is the “right place-right time” for a neighborhood commercial
development at the proposed location. Several members of the public spoke on this agenda item—both in favor of and in opposition to the proposed changes. After a discussion, the Board
recommended approval of the proposal on a 7-0 vote. RECOMMENDATION Although the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval, staff recommends that the City Commission deny Ordinance
No. 14-12 for a small-scale Comprehensive Plan amendment, including a Future Land Use Map amendment from CMR (Commerce) to TRN (Transitional) and an associated text amendment, and rezoning
from LI (Light Industrial) to NC (Neighborhood Commercial) for the subject property, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request
and approval thereof is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and does not meet the criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D)(5) and 3.1.1 of the Land Development Regulations.
5:',,&9,52A$20,5:',,&95*-9&*=&5//665,5*-9&*=5'9;:=(9&-;5:''5*,>6/;;$6&;9&5/:9-9,69;,/9,'/9,*<:6<,**5*-9:565,65*-9+&5//<,*=;,,,>&*.;5:'6**<*9669&*5,2L772@H,&;<',>6/;;$6&;9<*<:9;,'<69//9,'/9,*:5/&/:&5/
/9:&9*5*:,*:,6*5,;5:;,';5&*9'**-965<*-96*&5:,9:56C21*-6*:99*,'6C21*-9,<96/5:9:*&<;:;='96&:(9'-9:9,,',665&*9'*9G*/9,'/9,*/5'=,>*-9'96&:*5,5*-9*:,*:,6*5,;<*<:9;,'<69'96>,*5,9:*,,>*56';,'%,':9M5,,>,';&,
>6';,':969,*;=M5,9';;>-*,'<6*:;*5,&,9>-(5:-55'&5//9:&;'6*:&*%/9,',>OM5,,>/5'9;:=(9&-;5:'N,<:=0120O%:5',>>9,9:;:99;9:&;<696,>&;<69,',99&*9'*9C-9:96&'(#!!!6!62L772L2!2L770A@!4O&!O%C-9:965,@0$@K&&!O&$'(
O%C-9:96C&!;;&!6C2166C21!%C-9:96!" "#!!;</;</&/:&%C-9:968!!!;</&/:&*:,*%C-9:96C&!;;&8!*!!;<9!6C2166C21!%C-9:96"M'/&'(N!0120";;!'%C-9:96/2K0120M(&'(;!"H18!""!%
;#;%:,C-9:96!!6!2L772HAAM(;!" &%C-9:96&&&'(M(%C-9:96&&&'(&%C-9:96M'/&'(",5C*-9:95:9(9*5:',9'(=*-9&*=&5//665,5*-9&*=5'9;:=(9&-;5:'65;;5C6362*"60*!!;</!" "#*:,*67*&&&'("#!!!6!62L772L2!2L770A@!4O&!O6A*!
!;<9&&'("""*;<30*"!#C'5'"!"!!"!" !C,"&M !"!"C!!"I
;#;%:,:"!"4!&!&&;!!!4!#20!!#!0A!&95'2@!4!"""!!4!!,8!!!#!:21#C'5'#!:10B6B*M'/&'("",&,"&'"32;K212220O96?<:96<('65,O(407A7!":(&!!&'("'5:(4@0L22BK5:(4@0L22L0!":(&!6!@1192B11;20"3*;K212220O96?<:96<('65,O(
407A7!":(&!"3(,;22%611RBKV12OC9;222HK17@11, 6!;20%6@@RA7VB@OC2B1202B11C9;20%611RBKV12OC@11L6!;20%6@@RA7VB@OC6!22KL79$$6C21!"5:(4@0L22BK2L2!":(&!%,17RAKV27O99$$02K@,1R07V20O9!$$01111!6!L2R0KV7KO!7B11%
,!",72R1@V12O97BBH!6!0HR1KVB@O!HAH0%9!",HBR
:;#;%:,0HVB1O97BA7,;K%,@KR10VAKO9,;K212202@H2(*5>9*-9:C*-30;27#902B#"!5:(42L0BK@BA#!$$!6C21!C'96?<:96<('65,(407A7!":(&!"!"3(6!;27902B,21%6!@@RALVAKOCLA006!;279$$6!21!%,11R00V0@O9K21H9$$,;27%,@@RA7VB@
O9LB2L,,;27902B%6!11RBHVAKOCK22L9(*5>9*-9:C*-37*C2B902B;2796?<:96<('65,(407A7!":(&!6!(&!6L*M'&!M/&'(6B6H*""6@*!""! !"!"6K*"3$72!&5"!"6;&",
8;#;%:,!"!""!"&""!!!"669',''5*9'!70120DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD**96*/=5:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD&&4:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD6:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
IV. C. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT---MEETING DATE: March 19, 2012 AGENDA ITEM: IV. C. ITEM: 10th & 10th Center – Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment
and Rezoning. GENERAL DATA: Agent…………...……………... Bonnie Miskel Applicant………………………. West Corner Venture, LLC Owner…………………………. West Corner Venture, LLC Location..................................
South Side of SW 10th Street, Between SW 9th Avenue and SW 10th Avenue Property Size.......................... 1.5 Acres Existing Future Land Use Map designation……………………. Commerce (CMR)
Proposed Future Land Use Map designation……………… Transitional (TRN) Current Zoning……………….. Light Industrial (LI) Proposed Zoning……............. Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Adjacent Zoning…......
North: Open Space and Recreation (OSR) South: Light Industrial (LI) East: Community Facilities (CF) West: Mixed Industrial and Commercial (MIC) Existing Land Use................... Vacant
Proposed Land Use…............ Neighborhood Commercial Center Water Service......................... Connection Available Via Extension of 10” Water Main Within the SW 9th Avenue Rightof-Way
Sewer Service........................ Connection Available Via a 16” Sanitary Sewer Main Within the SW 10th Street Right-of-Way
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Vincent Nolan, Economic Development Director
Richard J. Reade, Sustainability Officer/Public Information Officer
THROUGH:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 29, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 9.D. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
RESOLUTION NO. 21 -12/DELRAY BEACH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Establish the Delray Beach Economic Development Fund and provide funding from the City's
unrestricted General Fund reserves to support economic opportunities (i.e, financial incentives) within
the City of Delray Beach.
BACKGROUND
During the City Commission's Workshop on March 15, 2012, consensus was provided to pursue
funding opportunities to improve the City’s competitiv e position with respect to retaining and recruiting
corporations and other businesses to Delray Beach. Thus, staff is proposing to create the Delray Beach
Economic Development Fund that would assist in crea ting sustainable, long-term measures to ensure
economic growth in the City. In addition, deve lopment of the Economic Development Fund would
enable the City to “level the playing field” with re gards to offering financial tools similar to those that
are utilized by the most competitive communities - locally, regionally and around the state.
The proposed Delray Beach Economic Developmen t Fund would serve as the City’s funding
mechanism to provide the required financial match to leverage Stat e and County financial incentives
[i.e., Qualified Target Industr y Refund Program (QTI), Governor's Quick Action Closing Fund
and Economic Development Trans portation Fund Road Fund] for th e retention and recruitment o f
businesses to Delray Beach. This new Fund is expe cted to assist in achieving the City’s economic
development goals:
. Improve the perception of Delray Beach as business friendly and a viable corporate
destination
. Grow sustainable & livable wage jobs (retention and creation)
. Encourage entrepreneurship (new & existing)
. Increase the Delray Beach tax base
As discussed with the Commission during the March Workshop, funding for the Delray Beach
Economic Development Fund is proposed to be provid ed from the City's unrestricted General Fund
reserves - up to a total of one million dollars ($1,000,000). All expenditures (i.e ., financial incentives)
from this fund will be awarded following author ization by the City Commission. Funding the Delray
Beach Economic Development Fund would serve as the most critical first step in creating and
implementing a successful citywide Economic Development Program.
Following approval of the proposed Resolution No. 21 -12, staff will immediately begin to develop
specific program guidelines for a local financial in centive program. In the interim, the Delray Beach
Economic Development Fund will announce to the bus iness community and our economic development
p artners within Palm Beach County and around the state that the City of Delray Beach is officially
ready to welcome new economic devel opment growth throughout our community.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 21-12, wh ich establishes the De lray Beach Economic
Development Fund and provides funding of up to a to tal of one million dollars ($1,000,000) from the
City's unrestricted General Fund re serves to provide the local ma tch for State and county business
incentive funds.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Randal L. Krejcarek, P.E., LEED AP, GISP, City Engineer
Richard C. Hasko, PE, Environmental Services Director
THROUGH:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 23, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 9.E. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
REQUEST DIRECTION ON THE CONVERSION OF S.E. 1ST STREET
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This item is before the Commission for direction on implementation schedule for conversion of SE 1st
St from SE 1st Ave to SE 6th Ave.Project #2004-006.
BACKGROUND
Staff continues to work with Palm Beach County Traffi c in an effort to convert SE 1st Street from S
Swinton Avenue to SE 6th Avenue from one-way to two-way. There are severa l barriers to converting
this street back to two-way:
S Swinton Avenue & SE/SW 1st Street
The span wire sign at this intersection is current ly hanging off FPL poles and FPL does not allow new
signals on their poles. Due to limitations on how cl ose a new mast arm pole can be to existing poles,
there currently is not sufficient right-of-way for th e installation of new mast arm poles. The property on
the NE corner of this intersection is in for redeve lopment and a 20’ by 20’ right-of-way corner clip is
b eing requested as part of the site plan approval. Staff has met with representatives of the Sundy House,
b ut the corner that the Sundy House is willing to pr ovide an easement on (NW corner) is not the corner
that an easement is needed. Typically, with one mast arm planned for the NE corner, the second mast
arm would be placed at the SW corner of this intersection.
SE 5th Avenue & SE 1st Street
Barriers at this intersection include; signal heads need to be added for westbound traffic and two new
p oles are required on the west approach. The existi ng roadway configuration does not allow for these
two new poles to be installed in the right-of-way, therefore temporary easements will have to be
obtained from the abutting property owners. A consultant will have to be hired to perform the required
structural analysis before submission to Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The trees on
the west approach will have to be trimmed so th at the new signal heads can be visible to oncoming
traffic. The cost of the signal conversion for this intersection is estimated to be $45,000. The cost to
obtain the required easements is dependent on how big the easements are and how long the easements
will be required, therefore are unknown at this time.
SE 6th Avenue & SE 1st Street
This conversion is relatively simple because no new signal heads will be required. The work involves
relocating signal heads and retiming. Estimated cost $12,000.
Both intersections with Federal Highway (SE 5t h Avenue and SE 6th Av enue) will require FDOT
p ermits. Initial conversations with FDOT indicate that in addition to the signal conversion work, the
City will be required to modify several of the cros sings at both SE 5th Avenue and SE 6th Avenue in
order to bring them up to current ADA standards. The cost to convert these crossing will not be known
until FDOT reviews the permit application.
Included in the US 1 Beautification project is a new mast arm signalized intersection at SE 5th Avenue
and SE 1st Street. The US 1 Beautification project has the new mast arm signals designed within the
existing right-of-way. No modification, other than making the intersection ADA compliant, is planned
for the intersection of SE 6th Avenue and SE 1st St reet as part of the US 1 Beautification project.
Due to the proposed increased sidewalk width along US 1, both intersections will be incurring
substantial modifications as part of the US 1 Be autification project. Therefore any modifications
required at either the SE 5th Avenue or SE 6th Avenue intersections for the temporary conversion o f
these two signalized intersections will be removed wh en the US 1 project begins. The current schedule
has the US 1 Beautification project beginning late this summer, with completion estimated to be in the
fall of 2013.
There currently are no Capital funds left in the City ’s general fund for this temporary conversion work.
Discussions with CRA staff indicate that they woul d be open to taking this item to the CRA Board for
approval of funding the temporary modifications.
If Commission direction is to move forward with th e conversion at this time, SE 1st Street would be
converted to two-way from SE 1st Avenue to SE 6th Avenue. The block between S Swinton Avenue
and SE 1st Avenue would remain a modified one-way street until the signal at S Swinton Avenue is
converted to handle two-way traffic.
RECOMMENDATION
Since the permitting process for a temporary conversi on is of uncertain length and long in any case (at
least 10 months), and since we would incur additional costs of $65,000 or more, I recommend that we
wait on the conversion until the signals are changed as part of the Federal Highway beautification
project, which should be completed in about 18 months.
1
Hasko, Richard
To:Krejcarek, Randal
Subject:RE: SE 1st st conversion to 2 way at 5th Ave and 6th Ave
From: Fattoush Jafar [mailto:FJafar@pbcgov.org]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 12:23 PM
To: Krejcarek, Randal
Cc: Sean Reilly
Subject: RE: SE 1st st conversion to 2 way at 5th Ave and 6th Ave
PlanforSE1 st St&SE6 th Ave/US1NBis95%done.We cansubmittoFDOTforpermit.
AssoonasFDOTapproves,wecanproceedwith thisone.Ianticipat ethistobeapprovedin2or3 months.(Thisishow
longittakesFDOTtoreview).Itwill takeusonemonthtoimplement.
PlanforSE1 st St&SE5 th Ave/US1SBis70%done.
CityneedtoverifyROWand UGutilities(youdeterminethe timeitwilltakeyou?)
SubmittoFDOTforconceptapproval.(Itt akesFDOT1to3monthstoreview)
PBCwillrevisedbasedontheconceptplanper FDOTcomments+Consultanttoperformstructuralanalysisfor
poles.Willtake1monthto2months.
ResubmittoFDOTforreview.(1 to3monthsFDOTreview)
IfFDOTapproves(NoGuaranteeFDOTwill approvethesecondround,butIambeingoptimistic):
PBCwillreleaseforconstruction.(itwill take4monthstocompleteconstruction)
Duringthese4monthstheCityshouldhelpus withtheutilitiesand trimmingtrees.
BestCasescenariois10months.I tcouldgoupto 2years,ifwehaveROW&utilityconflictsandproblemswith
FDOTapprovals.
Ifyouplan toimplementbothin tersectionssimultaneously,wewill submitbothtoFDOTfor permittogether.
Ihopethishelps.
From: Krejcarek, Randal [mailto:Krejcarek@mydelraybeach.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 11:39 AM
To: Fattoush Jafar
Cc: Sean Reilly
Subject: RE: SE 1st st conversion to 2 way at 5th Ave and 6th Ave
Justonemorequestion.IFCommission saystoproceedwithtemporaryconv ersion,canyouprovidemewitha
schedule?IthinkIwillbeaskedthisonTuesnight.
Thanks!
Randal L. Krejcarek, P.E.
LEED AP, GISP
City Engineer
2
Delray Beach, FL
Ph: 561.243.7322
Fx: 561.243.7060
krejcarek@MyDelrayBeach.com
From: Fattoush Jafar [mailto:FJafar@pbcgov.org ]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:13 PM
To: Krejcarek, Randal
Cc: Sean Reilly
Subject: SE 1st st conversion to 2 way at 5th Ave and 6th Ave
HiRandal,
Wedidaveryroughrev iewandestimate.Beloware ourestimatesandassumptions:
SE1 st St&SE6 th Ave/US1NB:
Thisistheeasyone.Nosignalheadsaddedtothe span.Shouldnotrequirestructural analysisbyFDOT.
Costestimated($9,000$13,100)
SE1 st St&SE5 th Ave/US1SB:
Thisisthecomplicatedone.
Weneedtoaddsignalheadsforthewestboundtraffic.Itisbesttoinstallthesignal headsbyadding2poleson
thewestside(NW &SW)corners.
Weneedtohaveaconsultantd ostructuralanalysisforthe2 polesweareadding.W edon’thavetheabilityto
dothatinhouseatthe County.TheCitywillhave topayforthat.
TheCityneedtohelpuswithtrimmin gtheTreesattheSWcornertoprovidet heclearancefortheinstallation
ofthepoles.
Wedon’thavegoodROWplans.The Citywillneedtohelpuswiththe ROWdeterminationforthe2poleson
thewestside.
Wearenotsureabouttheunderground (UG)utilities.ThereisanUGdrain attheNWcorner,weareassuming
the polecouldbelocatedwithintheROW withenoughclearancefrom thedrain.
WearenotsureabouttheUG utilitiesontheSWcorner.
Wewillneedadirectionalboretoconn ectthesignalheadsfromthe newpolesontheWestsidetothe
controllerontheSEcorner.
NWcornersidewalkwillneedtobem odifiedtoaccommodatethenewpoleand thepedestrianmaneuverability
atthatcorner.TheCity willhavetopayforthat.
Ifalltheassumptionsareokandn ounknowns,thecostwouldbe:
o $41,000
o $2,000StructuralAnalysis
o $1,000$2,000sidewalkmodific ationsbytheCity.
Ifyouneedanything else,letmeknow.
Fattoush
Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 30, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 9.F. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF REGULARLY SCHEDULED CITY COMMISSION
MEETING DATES
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This item is before the Commission to review and discuss an alternate date for the January 1, 2013
Regular Meeting and provide dir ection on whether to schedule the January 29, 2013 Annual Citizen's
Roundtable.
BACKGROUND
At the Annual Organizational Meeting on March 29, 2012 the Commission discussed and accepted the
regular meeting dates, with amendments, fo r the period April 2012 through March 2013. After
reviewing the amended schedule, a da te still needs to be set in place of the January 1, 2013 Regular
Meeting, because City Hall will be clos ed in observance of New Year's Day.
The consensus of the Commission at the December 13, 2011 Regular Meeting was to cancel the Annual
Citizen’s Roundtable on January 24, 2012 in favor of different options. Staff is requesting direction
regarding the Annual Citizen’s Roundtable whic h would be scheduled for January 29, 2013.
Below is the list of the regularly scheduled City Commission meeting dates for April 2012through
March 2013 that were approved at the March 29, 2012 Annual Organizational Meeting:
City Commission Meetings:
April 03, 2012-Regular Meeting
April 10, 2012-Workshop
April 17, 2012- Regular Meeting
May 01, 2012-Regular Meeting
May 08, 2012-Workshop
May 15, 2012-Regular Meeting
June 05, 2012-Regular Meeting
June 12, 2012-Workshop
June 19, 2012-Regular Meeting
July 05, 2012-Regular Meeting (Thursday)
July 10, 2012-Workshop
July 17, 2012-Regular Meeting
August 07, 2012-Regular Meeting
August 14, 2012-Workshop
August 21, 2012-Regular Meeting
September 04, 2012-Regular Meeting (Tentative Budget Hearing)
September 11, 2012 - Workshop
September 20, 2012-Regular Meeting (Final Budget Hearing) (Thursday)
October 02, 2012-Regular Meeting
October 09, 2012-Workshop
October 16, 2012-Regular Meeting
November 06, 2012-Regular Meeting (Election)
November 13, 2012-Workshop
November 20, 2012-Regular Meeting
December 04, 2012-Regular Meeting
December 11, 2012-Regular Meeting
January 01, 2013- (New Year's Day-City Hall Closed/Meeting date needs to be set)
January 08, 2013-Workshop
January 15, 2013-Regular Meeting
January 29, 2013-ANNUAL CITIZEN’S ROUNDTABLE-7 PM Old School Square
February 05, 2013-Regular Meeting
February 12, 2013-Workshop
February 19, 2013-Regular Meeting
March 05, 2013-Regular Meeting
March 12, 2013-MUNICIPAL ELECTION
March 14, 2013-Special Meeting
March 19, 2013-Regular Meeting
March 28, 2013-ANNUAL ORGANIZATIONAL MEETIN
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend Commission set an alte rnate date for the January 1, 2013 Regular Meeting; and provide
direction on whether to move forward with the January 29, 2013 Annual Citizen's Roundtable.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Scott Aronson, Parking Management Specialist
Richard C. Hasko, PE, Director of Environmental Services
THROUGH:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 27, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 9.G. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
REVISED VALET PARKING LICENSE AGREEMENTS
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Approval of the revised Valet Parking License Agreements in accordance with City Commission
direction provided to Staff.
BACKGROUND
At the December 6, 2011 City Commission meeting, a concern was raised that the City was not
maximizing revenue generated through the leasing of public parking spaces to provide Valet Parking
services. Staff was directed to provide options to in crease revenue, which were presented at the March
15, 2012 workshop. Consensus found the current program to be as successful as when first created to
p rovide an appreciated amenity rather than operating as a profit center. Deliberations then focused on
p otential modifications provided by staff and st akeholders, and recommendations included in
the parking study.
Changes in the proposed agreement, drafted in accordance with direction from the March 15, 2012
meeting, (see attached), are summarized below. It is noted that staff took this opportunity to correct
minor scrivener's errors.
Sec. 2) Valet signage must include "OPEN TO THE PUBLIC"
Sec. 4 and 9) The agreements ha ve been extended to 3-year terms, with 3% annual increases. As fees
remain unchanged for 3-years, Staff recommends a 5% increase upon entering into the approved
agreement. Verbiage addressing the potential in crease in fees to capture lost revenue if metering is
instituted is also included.
Sec. 8) Uniform shirts must display "VALET", have collars and be light in color to provide safety
while working in the right-of-way after dark.
Clarification is needed with regard to the pricing of spaces. Early in the deliberations a statement was
made that valet queue spaces west of the Intr acoastal Waterway, currently $100 per space per
month, should be the same price as those east of the ICW, currently $125. Further discussion suggested
modest increases in an effort to maintain low pr ices for customers. The $25 increase required west o f
the Intracoastal to create parity would be count erproductive to that effort. Consequently, staff's
recommendations do not include the creation of this parity.
In addition to the items discussed at the works hop, staff is providing additional recommendations for
your consideration. It is noted that the timing of the workshop allowed for the inclusion of input from
the Parking Management Advisory Board as is outlined under "Review by Others". Staff recommends:
A. Valet service must be provided throughout the year to assure service is consistently available to
customers of area
B. Queues should be staffed by a minimum of two (2 ) employees, with one stationed at the valet queue
at all times, to assure the smooth flow of traffic in the queue and to prevent illegal parking in the queue
which may result in a citation being issu ed and/or vehicle being towed, and
C. Parking lot(s) required for the storage of vehicles must be in the name of the licensee to assure
continued compliance with the agreement if a change in valet operators is needed.
REVIEW BY OTHERS
The Parking Management Advisory Board, at its meeting of March 27, 2012 recommended of the
following:
> All signage must include "OPEN TO THE PUBLIC";
> Uniform shirts to display "VALET" on the back and LICENSEE name and/or logo on front, left
upper torso, providing the appropriate party to contact for service related issues;
> Shirts with collars, light in color for safety working in the right-of-way after dark;
> Annual 3% increases, commencing with the 2013 renewal;
> Valet queues must remain operational al l year to provide service, and;
> A minimum of one (1) parking lot lease, required for the storage of vehicles, must be in the name o f
the LICENSEE to provide continued service if replacement of their valet company becomes necessary.
The PMAB did not recommend approval of the following recommendations:
* Valet company name and/or logo on the front of shirt
* The proposed 5% increase failed to pass in a 3-3 vote (Marincola and Gergen
recused themselves from this financial aspect of the Board's action), and
* Did not agree with the 2-person minimum staffing level.
RECOMMENDATION
By motion, recommend approval of the modifications contained in the proposed Valet Parking License
Agreements, with further revision to include items A, B, and C as identif ied under "Background" above.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Catherine M. Kozol, Asst. City Attorney/Police Legal Advisor
THROUGH:City Attorney
DATE:March 27, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 9.H. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
OFFER OF SETTLEMENT IN VINCENT GRAY V. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH AND RALPH
PHILLIPS
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This is an offer of settlement by the plaintiff, Vincent Gray, in the amount of $175,000.00 in the case o f
Gray v. City of Delray Beach and Ralph Phillips.
BACKGROUND
This case arose out of a case involving the City of Delray Beach, Sergeant Vincent Gray and former
Captain Ralph Phillips. Sergeant Gray filed a Whistle blower action against the City. He has offered to
settle the case with the City for the sum of $175,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Attorney's Office recommends denial of this offer.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 27, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 9.I. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
APPOINTMENT TO THE PUBLIC ART ADVISORY BOARD
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This item is before the City Commission for an appointment to the Public Art Advisory Board.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Jonathan Jonas, regular member on the Public Art Advisory Board, submitted his resignation
effective immediately. An appointment is needed for one (1) regular member to serve an unexpired
term ending July 31, 2013.
On February 1, 2005, the Delray Beach City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 77-04 establishing the
Public Art Advisory Board for the purpose of advising and making recommendations to the City
Commission with respect to public art policy and related issues including, but not limited to, the
selection, construction and placement of public art in/on City right-of-way and City owned property.
The Public Art Advisory Board shall consist of seve n (7) members. Three (3) seats on the Board must
b e filled with either an artist, architect, landscape architect or engineer. Laypersons of knowledge,
experience and judgment who have an interest in public art shall make up the balance of the Board.
The following individuals have submitted applications and would like to be considered for
appointment:
Alexia Rouquette Real Estate/Marketing/Public Relations
Kera Trowbridge Interviewer-Panelist
A check for code violations and/or municipal liens was conducted. None were found. Voter registration
verification was completed and all are registered.
Based on the rotation system, the appointment will be made by Commissioner Jacquet (Seat #2) for one
(1) regular member to serve an unexpired term ending July 31, 2013.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend appointment of one (1) regular member to serve on the Public Art Advisory Board for an
unexpired term ending July 31, 2013.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 27, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 9.J. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEET ING OF APRIL 3, 2012
APPOINTMENT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This item is before the City Commision for an appointment to the Neighborhood Advisory Council.
BACKGROUND
There is a vacancy on the Neighborhood Advisory Council for a regular member from Zone 2. An
appointment is needed for one (1) regular member to serve an unexpired term ending July 31, 2014.
The Neighborhood Advisory Council was establishe d for the purpose of maintaining broad-b ased
community involvement with the residents, cr eating neighborhood outreach initiatives, enhancing
communication, improving the aesthetics of the neig hborhoods and identifying any potential threats to
the stability of the neighborhoods.
The Council consists of fifteen (15) regular and tw o (2) student members. Twelve (12) members are
residents with two (2) selected from each of the six neighborhood zones, and three (3) at large
representatives, who may be selected from a comm unity civic organization or business owner located
within a neighborhood zone interested in the e nhancement of its surrounding neighborhoods. A map o f
the appointment zones is included for your review.
The following individual has submitted an application for consideration:
Colson Zulmar Zone 2
Based on the rotation system, the appointment will be made by Commissioner Gray (Seat #4) for one
(1) regular member from Zone 2 to serv e an unexpired term ending July 31, 2014.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend an appointment of one (1) regular me mber to serve on the Neighborhood Advisory Council
for an unexpired term ending July 31, 2014.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 27, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 9.K. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
APPOINTMENT TO THE CHARTER REVISION COMMITTEE
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
The item before Commission is appointment of the Chairperson to the Charter Revision Committee.
BACKGROUND
At the March 20, 2012 Meeting, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 18-12 establishing the
Charter Revision Committee. The sole purpose of th e Charter Revision Committee is to review the
City's Charter and formulate recommendations to the City Commission. Once the Commission appoints
the membership, the resolution provides that the Ch arter Revision Committee shall immediately pursue
its assigned task with a target co mpletion date of September 1, 2012. The committee would sunset on
the completion of its assignment, unless otherwise extended by action of the City Commission.
Per Resolution No. 18-12, the committee consists of eleven (11) members including a
Chairperson. Mayor McDuffie (Seat #5) will appoi nt the Chairperson. The following nominee would
like to be considered for appointment:
Jay Alperin
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend appointment of the Chairperson to the Charter Revision Committee.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 27, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 10.A. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
ORDINANCE NO. 05 -12
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This ordinance is before Co mmission for second reading and quasi-judicial hearing to consider a
privately-initiated Future Land Use Map change from Transitional (TRN) to General Commercial (GC),
rezoning from POC (Planned Office Center) to PC (Planned Commercial), and a Text Amendment o f
the Comprehensive Plan modifying the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use
designation to specify a maximum FAR of 0.46 for a 9.95 acre property located on the southeast corner
of Linton Boulevard and Federal Highway (1801 a nd 1845 South Federal Highway) known as Delray
Place.
BACKGROUND
At the first reading on March 6, 2012, the Commissi on passed Ordinance No. 05-12. However, a point
was raised during the Commission's discussion about th e importance of the applicant speaking directly
with the neighbors.
A meeting was held on Thursday, March 15 between the developer, his design team and several
representative of the Tropic Isles Association Board. The meeting highlighted the developer vision for
the redevelopment of the property as well as the reside nt’s concerns with redevelopment. City staff was
also present and they discussed current requireme nts for compatibility and buffering of adjacent
properties and the city development process where th ese issues are most appropriately addressed.
Commission made a motion to postpone Ordinance No. 05-12 at the public hearing on March 20, 2012
to April 3, 2012. The motion was approved 4-1; Commissioner Frankel dissenting.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of Ordinance No . 05-12 on second and final reading.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Estelio Breto, Senior Planner
Paul Dorling, AICP, Director of Planning and Zoning
THROUGH:City Manager
DATE:February 29, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 12.A. - REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 6, 2012
ORDINANCE NO. 05 -12
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Consideration of a privately sponsored Future Land Use Map change from Transitional (TRN) to
General Commercial (GC), rezoning from POC (Planned Office Center) to PC (Planned Commercial),
and Text Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan modifying the description of the GC (General
Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify a maximum FAR of 0.46 for a 9.95 acre property
located on the southeast comer of Linton Boulevard and Federal Highway (1801 and 1845 South
Federal Highway).
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Linton Boulevard and Federal Highway and is
approximately 9.95 acres in size. The property is known as the Old Harbor Office and Bank Facility and
it is currently occupied by three office buildings: two multiple-story office buildings (one located to the
north of the property and the other to the south), and a one-story multiple tenant office building located
to the east side of the property along Linton Boulevard. The property was originally annexed into the
City of Delray Beach from unincorporated Palm Beach County in the late 1970's. The property was
assigned the Future Land Use Map designation of Transitional (TRN) and a zoning of SAD (Special
Activities District) and it was developed with three office buildings and associated parking
simultaneously with the annexation. In 1991, the City of Delray Beach adopted new Land Development
Regulations and the property was assigned the new zoning designation of POC (Planned Office Center)
and retained the Future Land Use Map Designation of TRN (Transitional).
The requested Future Land Use Map designation from Transitional (TRN) to General Commercial (GC)
and rezoning from Planned Office Center (POC) to Planned Commercial (PC), for the subject property
is to allow greater development flexibility on the property including the future potential of a Multiple
Building Commercial Development. The proposal also includes a privately-initiated amendment to the
Text of the Comprehensive Plan modifying the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future
Land Use designation to limit the maximum intensities (FAR’s) for Delray Place. The maximum
Page 1of 2 Coversheet
3/7/2012 htt p ://itweba pp /A g endaIntranet/Bluesheet.as p x?ItemID=5405&Meetin g ID=346
intensity will be reduced from a FAR (Floor Area Ratio) of 3.0 to 0.46 to assure any resulting
development will meet traffic concurrency.
REVIEW BY OTHERS
At its meeting of February 27, 2012, the Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing associated
with the GC Future Land Use Map amendment, PC rezoning request, and Text Amendment of the
Comprehensive Plan modifying the description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use
designation to identify a maximum FAR of 0.46 for the subject property.
The Board had concerns which centered more around issues relating to site plan approval and not the
b roader issues relating to whether the proposed Land Use and Zoning designations are
appropriate. These concerns included the width of the buffer that separates the subject property from the
residential development to the south and east. The public expressed concerns over how the rezoning
proposal fits into the South Federal Highway Redevelopment plan which is underway. The public also
had concerns regarding the increase in traffic and noise with a new development, the potential
diminishment of property values, compatibility with existing developments in the neighborhood, etc.
After an intense discussion, the Board recommended denial of the proposed FLUM, Rezoning and Text
Amendment on a 5-0 vote.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve on first reading Ordinance 05-12 for a Future Land Use Map amendment from TRN
(Transitional) to GC (General Commercial), Rezoning from POC (Planned Commercial) to PC (Planned
Commercial) and the Text Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan modifying the description of the GC
(General Commercial) Future Land Use Map designation to reduce the maximum FAR to 0.46 for
Delray Place, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the
request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does meet the criteria set
forth in LDR Sections 3.1.1 (Required Findings), 3.2.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions), 2.4.5(D)(5)
(Rezoning Findings).
Page 2of 2 Coversheet
3/7/2012 htt p ://itweba pp /A g endaIntranet/Bluesheet.as p x?ItemID=5405&Meetin g ID=346
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT---
MEETING DATE: February 27, 2012
ITEM: V. A.Privately-initiated amendment to the Text of the Comprehensive Plan modifying the
description of the GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use designation to identify
specific uses and intensities (FAR’s) for Delray Place, located at the southeast corner
of Linton Boulevard and South Federal Highway; and associated Small-Scale Future
Land Use Map amendment from TRN (Transitional) to GC (General Commercial); and
Rezoning from POC (Planned Office Center) to PC (Planned Commercial) for said
property. Quasi-Judicial Hearing.
GENERAL DATA:
Agent…………………............... Covelli Design Associates, Inc.
Location...................................... Southeast comer of Linton Boulevard
and Federal Highway (1801 and
1845 South Federal Highway)
Property Size.............................. 9.94 acres
Existing FLUM........................... TRN (Transitional)
Proposed FLUM......................... GC (General Commercial)
Current Zoning............................ POC (Planned Office Center)
Proposed Zoning........................ PC (Planned Commercial
Adjacent Zoning................North: PC (Planned Commercial) and RM
(Multiple Family Residential
- Medium Density)
East: R-1-AA-B (Single Family Residential)
And CD (Conservation District)
South: PC (Planned Commercial); RM
(Multiple Family Residential-Medium
Density); R-1-AA-B (Single Family
Residential.
West: PC (Planned Commercial)
Existing Land Use...................... Old Harbor Office and Bank Facility
Proposed Land Use.................... Multiple building commercial
development
Water Service…………………… Available via connection to a 12”
water main located on the east side
of S. Federal Hwy., a 10” water main
on Eve Street, and a 6” water main
on the south side of Linton
Boulevard.
Sewer Service…………………… Available via connection to a 8”
sewer main located on Eve Street.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 28, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 10.B. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
ORDINANCE NO. 09 -12
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This ordinance is before Commission for second read ingto consider a city-initiated amendment to Land
Development Regulations (LDR) Appendix “A”, “Defin itions”, to expand the definition of “Restaurant
(Bona Fide)”, to clarify required operati ons and components for restaurant uses.
BACKGROUND
At the first reading on March 20, 2012, the Commission passed Ordinance No. 09-12.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of Ordinance No . 09-12 on second and final reading.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:MARK MCDONNELL, AICP, ASST. DIRECTOR PLANNING AND ZONING
PAUL DORLING, AICP, DIRECTOR PLANNING AND ZONING
THROUGH:CITY MANAGER
DATE:March 14, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 12.A. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 20, 2012
ORDINANCE NO. 09 -12
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Approval of a city-initiated amendment to the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) that will expand
the definition of “Restaurant”.
BACKGROUND
Over the last several years, the City has become increasingly aware that some establishments in the
downtown area that are approved as restaurants transform into stand-alone bars and nightclubs after a
certain hour of the evening. When this occurs, the uses are in violation because they either become
stand-alone bars for which they are not approved, and/or they fail to satisfy the requirements for
operation as a restaurant.
To help remedy this situation and to make the Land Development Regulations even more clear, the
current definition of restaurant is being expanded. To avoid such establishments from becoming dance
clubs, language is added that requires that all tables, chairs and counter areas are to remain available for
full course meal service during all hours of operation. New language is added that states that “stand
alone bar facilities serving food” do not qualify as bona fide restaurants. Finally, the definition is
strengthened to require that service of full course meals must be available at all times that alcoholic
beverages are being served.
REVIEW BY OTHERS
The Pineapple Grove Main Street Committee reviewed the item at their March 7, 2012 meeting and
recommended approval, subject to adding language that would allow restaurants to move some tables to
provide space for entertainment venues (i.e., bands, music, etc.)
The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the item at their February 27, 2012 meeting and
recommended approval on a 4-0 vote.
Page 1of 2 Coversheet
3/28/2012 htt p ://itweba pp /A g endaIntranet/Bluesheet.as p x?ItemID=5447&Meetin g ID=348
RECOMMENDATION
By motion, approve Ordinance No. 09-12 on first reading for a city-initiated amendment to the Land
Development Regulations, Appendix A, “Definitions”, to Clarify Required Operations and Components
for Restaurant Uses, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding
that the amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section
2.4.5(M) of the Land Development Regulations.
Page 2of 2 Coversheet
3/28/2012 htt p ://itweba pp /A g endaIntranet/Bluesheet.as p x?ItemID=5447&Meetin g ID=348
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:David T. Harden, City Manager
DATE:March 28, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 10.C. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
ORDINANCE NO.10 -12
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
This ordinance is before Commission for second reading to consider a city-initiated amendment to the
Land Development Regulations (LDR) Appendix “A”, “Definitions”, to provide a definition o f
“Delicatessen”, Section 4.6.9, “Off-Street Parking Re gulations”, and Article 6.3, “Use and Work in the
Public Right of Way”, Subsection 6.3.3, “Sidewalk Café”, to provide a definition, clarify required
parking, and to clarify the characteristics of a Delicatessen.
BACKGROUND
At the first reading on March 20, 2012, the Commission passed Ordinance No. 10-12.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of Ordinance No . 10-12 on second and final reading.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:MARK MCDONNELL, AICP, ASST. DIRECTOR PLANNING AND ZONING
PAUL DORLING, AICP, DIRECTOR PLANNING AND ZONING
THROUGH:CITY MANAGER
DATE:March 14, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 12.B. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 20, 2012
ORDINANCE NO. 10 -12
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Approval of a city-initiated amendment to the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) that will clarify
parking requirements for delicatessen and similar uses, identify how sidewalk café components can be
utilized for these uses, and to provide a new definition for delicatessen.
BACKGROUND
The primary purpose of this amendment is to clarify parking requirements for delis, sandwich shops,
coffee shops, and sub shops, and to identify how sidewalk café components can be utilized for these
uses, and to provide a new definition for delicatessen. An additional change is included to clarify where
sidewalk cafés can be established by modifying the current reference from “public space” to “in front o f
public open space plazas adjacent to the business”.
Delicatessen uses, along with ice cream stores, sandwich shops, sub shops, coffee shops, and other
similar uses with no indoor seating are considered ‘take-out only’ facilities and are assessed a general
commercial parking requirement. If these uses have indoor seating, they are more akin to restaurant uses
and the restaurant parking requirement is applied.
These take-out uses are allowed to have sidewalk cafés where take-out products could be
consumed. Additional clarification is provided in the sidewalk café section of the LDRs that limit
sidewalk café operations for take-out facilities to take-out food only. Waiter/waitress service to tables is
only allowed for restaurants or facilities which have been assessed restaurant parking requirements.
The amendment also modifies the reference to “open space” in the sidewalk café regulations to reflect
“public open space plazas”.
Finally, a definition for Delicatessen is provided to further help regulate and provide a distinction from
restaurant uses.
Page 1of 2 Coversheet
3/28/2012 htt p ://itweba pp /A g endaIntranet/Bluesheet.as p x?ItemID=5448&Meetin g ID=348
REVIEW BY OTHERS
The Pineapple Grove Main Street Committee reviewed the item at their March 7, 2012 meeting and
recommended approval.
The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the item at their February 27, 2012 meeting and a
recommendation for approval on a 4-0 vote was made.
RECOMMENDATION
By motion, approve Ordinance No. 10-12 on first reading for a city-initiated amendment to the Land
Development Regulations, Appendix “A”, “Definitions” By Enacting A New Definition O f
“Delicatessen”; By Amending 4.6.9, “Off-Street Parking Regulations”, Subsection (C)(3)(D),
“Restaurants”; And Section 6.3.3(F), “Regulations Governing The Use, Design, And Maintenance Of A
Sidewalk Café”, To Clarify Parking Requirements And Sidewalk Café Components For Delicatessens
And Similar Uses , by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that
the amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.5
(M) of the Land Development Regulations.
Page 2of 2 Coversheet
3/28/2012 htt p ://itweba pp /A g endaIntranet/Bluesheet.as p x?ItemID=5448&Meetin g ID=348
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM:Ronald Hoggard, AICP, Principal Planner
Paul Dorling, AICP, Director Planning and Zoning
THROUGH:City Manager
DATE:March 26, 2012
SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM 12.A. -REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2012
ORDINANCE NO. 14 -12
ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION
Consideration of a privately-initiated small-scale Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning for the
p roposed 10th & 10th Center, located at the southeas t corner of SW 10th Street and SW 10th Avenue.
The small-scale Comprehensive Plan amendment cons ists of a Future Land Use Map change from CMR
(Commerce) to TRN (Transitional) and an associated Text Amendment modifying the description of the
Transitional Land Use designation within the Future Land Use Element to restrict the use on the
p roperty to nonresidential development at a maxi mum FAR of 0.25. The associated rezoning will
change the property from LI (Light I ndustrial) to NC (N eighborhood Commercial).
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located at the southeast corn er of SW 10th Street and SW 10th Avenue, and is
approximately 1.49 acres in size. This property and the surrounding area are located within the Wallace
Drive Industrial Area, which is subject to the “W allace Drive Redevelopment Plan”, adopted by the
City Commission on January 6, 2004. The Plan encourag es the development of light industrial, limited
commercial and office uses in an urban sett ing. The Plan recommended a Future Land Use Map
(FLUM) amendment and rezoning for the subject property from Redevelopment Area #2 (RDA-2) to
Commerce (CMR) and from Single-Family Residentia l (R-1-A) to Light Industrial (LI), respectively.
The recommended FLUM amendment and rezoning were approved by the City Commission on January
6, 2004.
The requested Future Land Use Map amendment from CMR (Commerce) to TRN (Transitional) and
rezoning from Light Industrial (LI) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) is to allow development of a
neighborhood commercial center at this location. The applicant’s justification for these modifications is
that there have been changes in i ndustrial market conditions since adoption of the Wallace Drive Plan in
2004 which make additional industrial development imprac tical; and that there has been an increase in
residential development in the immediate area th at has resulted in increased demand for neighborhood
retail and services uses.
Staff agrees that there have been changes in industr ial market conditions since 2004 and that this is the
result of the current economic downturn. Staff does not agree that the current economic condition s
represent a necessity to change long-range future land use provisions for the City. There was no timelin e
associated with the redevelopment effort given in the Redevelopment Plan. Redevelopment will no t
occur until opportunities arise on individual pr operties and market conditions support thos e
opportunities.
The City’s only has 374 acres of land within the I ndustrial Land Use categorie s of IND (Industrial) an d
CMR (Commerce). This represent only 3.7% of th e City’s developable land area. The applicant’s
j ustification statement included data that the City of Boca Raton reduced its light industrial land use b y
25% between 1989 and 2005. It is significant to no te that Boca Raton’s 2005 figure of 6.45% is stil l
75% higher than the City’s 3.7% figure. It is also important to note that the City reduced the amount o f
industrial land use in 2006 with creation of the MROC zoning district along the Congress Avenu e
corridor. This new zoning district eliminated industrial zoning in favor of a mixed residential, office an d
commercial zoning to encourage mixed use develo pment with commercial or office on the ground floo r
and residential above utilizing ne w urbanism design elements.
Staff’s position is supported by the Palm Beach County Light Industrial Land Use Stud y
“Whitepaper” and “Land Use Toolkit”, p repared by Swiger Consulting in December 2007, whic h
recommends the retention of Industr ial properties. Further reduction of the City’s industrial base i s
unwarranted at this time and should be discourag ed. The current Future Land Use Map designation o f
Commerce, along with the existing Light Industrial zoning is flexible enough to allow considerabl e
development opportunities for the subject property as the economy improves. The allowed principal use s
include “research and development”; “Wholesalin g, Storage and Distribution”; “Manufacturing an d
Assembly”; “Office”; and “Repair”. It also allows limited retail for items processed on the premises.
In terms of increased demand from the additional resi dential development in the area, staff notes tha t
while more than 445 additional resi dential multifamily units have be en approved and some of the unit s
b uilt within the area north of SW 10th Street, this area was zoned for multipl e family development prio r
to adoption of the Wallace Drive Redevelopment Plan in 2004. In terms of long-range planning, th e
construction of these anticipated units does not really represent a change in circumstances. Th e
applicant’s property is located 0.45 miles from the Vi llages at Delray/Village Square developments. Th e
convenience shopping needs of these residents are cu rrently being met by two convenience stores -- th e
ABC Mini Mart, located at the southwest corner of SW 10th Street and SW 10th Avenue and the Valer o
gas station/convenience store, located in the Sher wood Park Plaza at the southeast corner of SW 10t h
Street and Congress Avenue. Sherwood Park Plaz a is the closest neighbor hood service/retail shoppin g
center, and is the same distance away from the new re sidential units as the subject property. At one time,
this center even had a Dollar General Store, but it has since been closed. Over 7,000 square feet of spac e
is currently vacant at this center. Major shopping/services are also available on Linton Boulevard a t
Linton Square Plaza, 0.9 miles away, Linton Center, 1.2 miles away, and The Plaza at Delray, 1.8 mile s
away. Finally, downtown Delray Beach, with a wide range of specialty shops, is 1.7 miles away.
For the reasons outlined above, staff feels that th e changed conditions are not sufficient to warran t
approval of the proposed FLUM modification, whic h will reduce the amount of land in the Commerc e
FLUM designation. This reduction is in direct conflict with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.3,
which says that such reductions should be discouraged.
The applicant’s proposal also includes an associated text amendment to the Future Land Use Element o f
the Comprehensive Plan modifying the description of the Transitional Future Land Use Map designatio n
to limit development of the subject property to nonresidential uses at a maximum FAR (Floor Are a
Ratio) of 0.25. This text amendm ent will reduce the maximum potentia l traffic impact of a 100% retai l
development to a level less than or equal to th at which could be realized by a mixed office/retai l
development under the existing Commerce FLUM designation at its maximum FAR of 0.60. A
maximum Floor Area Ratio of 1.0 is currently pe rmitted for nonresidential uses in the Transitiona l
designation. If the FLUM amendment and rezoning are supported by the City Commission, then the text
amendment should also be supported.
Since the proposed FLUM amendment and rezoning ar e not consistent with recommendations in the
adopted Wallace Drive Redevelopment Plan, the appl icant is seeking a concurrent amendment of the
Redevelopment Plan to address the conflicts. This modification, which is being processed concurrently,
will be scheduled for City Commission action at the same meeting as the sec ond reading of Ordinance
14-12.
REVIEW BY OTHERS
At its meeting of March 19, 2012, the Planning and Z oning Board held a public hearing associated with
the small-scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment, including a Future Land Use Map amendment from
CMR (Commerce) to TRN (Transitional) and an asso ciated text amendment; rezoning from LI (Light
Industrial) to NC (Neighborhood Commercial); and mo dification of the Wallace Drive Redevelopment
Plan. Staff presented its analysis of the appli cant’s justification for the proposed changes and
recommended that the Board move a recommendation of denial based on a failure to make positive
findings related to “Demonstration of Need” and consis tency with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of
the Comprehensive Plan. Note: the complete analysis of applicant’s justification is included in the
attached Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report.
The applicant made a presentation in support of the cha nges and stated that there is not a current market
for light industrial development; that the future ma rket for the light industrial development will be
limited; and that this is the “right place-right ti me” for a neighborhood commercial development at the
proposed location. Several members of the public spoke on this agenda item—b oth in favor of and in
opposition to the proposed changes. After a disc ussion, the Board recommended approval of the
proposal on a 7-0 vote.
RECOMMENDATION
Although the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval, staff recommends that the City
Commission deny Ordinance No. 14-12 for a small-scale Comprehensive Plan amendment, including a
Future Land Use Map amendment from CMR (Commerce) to TRN (Transitional) and an associated text
amendment, and rezoning from LI (Light Industria l) to NC (Neighborhood Commercial) for the subject
p roperty, by adopting the findings of fact and law c ontained in the staff report, and finding that the
request and approval thereof is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and does not meet the criteria
set forth in Sections 2.4.5(D)(5) and 3.1.1 of the Land Development Regulations.
IV. C.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT---
MEETING DATE: March 19, 2012
AGENDA ITEM:IV. C.
ITEM:10 th & 10 th Center – Small Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment and
Rezoning.
GENERAL DATA:
Agent…………...……………... Bonnie Miskel
Applicant………………………. West Corner Venture, LLC
Owner…………………………. West Corner Venture, LLC
Location.................................. South Side of SW 10 th Street,
Between SW 9 th Avenue and SW
10 th Avenue
Property Size.......................... 1.5 Acres
Existing Future Land Use Map
designation…………………….Commerce (CMR)
Proposed Future Land Use
Map designation……………… Transitional (TRN)
Current Zoning……………….. Light Industrial (LI)
Proposed Zoning……............. Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
Adjacent Zoning…...... North:Open Space and Recreation
(OSR)
South:Light Industrial (LI)
East:Community Facilities (CF)
West:Mixed Industrial and Commercial
(MIC)
Existing Land Use................... Vacant
Proposed Land Use…............ Neighborhood Commercial
Center
Water Service......................... Connection Available Via
Extension of 10” Water Main
Within the SW 9 th Avenue Right-
of-Way
Sewer Service........................ Connection Available Via a 16”
Sanitary Sewer Main Within the
SW 10 th Street Right-of-Way