Loading...
10-28-97 Special/Workshop DELRAY BEACH CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA - CITY COMMISSION Ali.America City FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM ~11 The City will furnish auxiliary aids and services to afford an indi- vidual with a disability an opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program or activity conducted by the City. Contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127 (voice) or 243-7199 (TDD), 24 hours prior to the event in order for the City to accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available. SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA Pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Mayor Jay Alperin has instructed me to announce a Special Meeting of the City Commission, to be held for the following Purposes: (1) Settlement/Elizabeth & Milton Hartmann v. City of Delray Beach: Consider settlement of the referenced matter. (2) Pedi-Cab Use/Art and Jazz on the Avenue: Consider the use of pedi-cabs in the downtown area for the October 30th Art and Jazz on the Avenue. Alison MacGregor Harry City Clerk WORKSHOP AGENDA (1) Introduction of Mr. Robert Burdett, the new Executive Director of the Palm Beach County Municipal League. (2) Direction concerning proposed amendments to Resolution Nos. 121-92 and 39-93 with respect to the Parking Management Team. (3) Discussion with the Parking Management Team concerning consultant recommendations. (4) Presentation regarding Barrier Island Water Reuse. (5) Proposed LDR amendments to eliminate a maximum density restric- tion on residential dwelling units within certain sections of the Central Business District (CBD). (6) Commission Comments. Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, such person will need to ensure that a verbatim record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. The City neither provides nor prepares such record. CITY DF I]ELRR¥ BER[H CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE }'AC'~M~L~ ,~ ~:: ~ ?,~ 47~5 Writer's Direct Line: (561) 243-70~ DELRAY BEACH  ~MOR~D~ All.~a TO: Ci~ Co~ission 1993 n~ FROM: David N. Tolces, Assistant City Attor SUBJECT: Se~lement of Elizabeth & Milton Ha~ma~ v. Ci~ of Delray Beach This case arises out of a trip and fall on the City sidewalk adjacent to the Delray Harbor Club on the east side of Federal Highway just south of Knowles Park. Mrs. Hartmann tripped and fell while walking on the sidewalk. In the area where she fell, the sidewalk was cracked and uplifted. The crack and rise in the sidewalk could have been caused by tree roots growing underneath the sidewalk. In this case, the Plaintiff filed suit against the City and the Delray Harbor Club. Under Florida law, a municipality can be held liable for injuries caused by defects in sidewalks which are caused by "subterranean root growth." Mrs. Hartmann, 71 years old, suffered fractures of the little and ring fingers of her left hand, several abrasions on her legs and arm, and broke her glasses as a result of her fall. As of today, she continues to have difficulty using her left hand. Mr. Hartmann is claiming loss of care and consortium as a result of the injuries. The Plaintiffs have agreed to settle with the City for $10,500.00 inclusive of all attorney's fees and costs. Our office recommends settlement for that amount in exchange for dismissal of the case and execution of appropriate releases by the Plaintiffs. The City's Risk Manager, Frank Babin and Steve Hanzman, adjuster for Gallagher Bassett, concur in our recommendation. Please call if you have any questions. DNT:smk cc: David T. Harden, City Manager Alison MacGregor Harty, City Clerk Frank Babin, Risk Manager hartmanl .dm 5'P. /. Pr,,?te:! ~,n Recyc~:/Pa?er MEMORANDUM TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER FROM: ~OBERT A. BARCINSKI, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #~- SPECIAL MEETING OF OCTOBER 28, 1997 USE OF PEDI-CABS AT ART AND JAZZ SPECIAL EVENT DATE: OCTOBER 24, 1997 ACTION: City Commission is requested to approve a request from the Joint Venture to allow A-1-A Bike Rentals to provide pedi-cab services on a one-time basis for the Art and Jazz special event on October 30, 1997. BACKGROUND: Pedi-cabs are not allowed to operate per our current ordinances. City Commission indicated that they will review this item again when they receive the traffic study. Attached is the letter request from the Joint Venture with the listed conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request with the listed conditions. However, we would also recommend that if another vendor requests to provide this service that they be allowed to do so with the Joint Venture's approval under the same conditions. ref:agmemo6 October 24, 1997 Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manger City of 13elray Beach 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 RE: AGENDA ITEM .CONSIDERATION - pEDI-CABS AR]- & JAZZ, OCTOBER 30, 1997 Dear Bob: The Joint Venture Board at its meeting of October 23, 1997 asked that a request be made to the City Commission giving approval of the use of pedi-cabs, on a one time basis, dudng Art & Jazz held on Thursday, October 30, 1997. This request is conditioned on the following by A1A Bike Rentals: 1. That A1A Bike Rentals operates and takes responsibility for this operation. 2_ That this approval is for this event only_ 3. That the pedi-cab ddvers are 18 years or older, with appropriate dnver's license, and no traffic violation for the past two years. 4 That A1A Bike Rentals show proof of liability. The pacameters for the pedi-cab operation will coincide with the street closures during Art & Jazz, (S.W. 4th to A1A), from 5:00 p m. to midnight. Your ConSideration of this request is very much appreciated_ Sincerely, MARJORIE FERRER Downtown Coordinator /sk D£LIO-Y BEACH JOINI VENTURE ° Community Rrdcvelopmcn! Agency · I~lra¥ Beach Charab~:r of Commer~nce - Downiown Devela~ment Authority 64 S.E. Fifth Avenue, Dclray Beach, FL 334g~ - Tel: ~61-27g-0424 · Fax: ~61-278-0555 · ~OO ~ ~ TO: Sharon DATE: 10/9/97 · · (J ~ ~) ·~ FROM: Alison~v~ · · ©000 susJ: · ~ ~~ Municipal League ~~O~Oi The City Manager just informed me that the Municipal League has a new director. He would like us to contact him and invite him to attend the City Co~ission's October 28th workshop so that he can introduce himself to the Co~ission and make any remarks he might want to. Please call the Municipal League (355-4484) to get the new Director's name and extend the invitation, followed up in writing. If he is able to make it, we can then schedule accordingly. '.. Thanks. cc: Barbara MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden City Manager FROM: p~Robert A. Barcinski Assistant City Manager DATE: October 21, 1997 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP - OCTOBER 28, 1997 PARKING MANAGEMENT TEAM Direction City Commission is requested to review the 1992 resolution that established the Parking Management Team and provide direction on the following: · Status of Task Team · Membership ,~ · Responsibilities and duties · Staff support Background The Parking Management Team was established by City Commission in 1992 by resolution to advise City Commission on the planning, development, construction, and operation of parking and to make recommendations on and implement provisions of the 1991 Master Parking Plan. The PMT was not set up as an official advisory board to City Commission. Membership consists of ten (10) members with representation narrowly defined. A copy of the PMT board membership is attached. Members were nominated by the CRA and appointed by City Commission. Staff support was loosely defined with initial support provided by the CRA with the understanding that a permanent program for the administrative aspects of the PMT would be provided at a later date. Staff assistance has been provided by the CRA with assistance from our Planning and Police Departments. The PMT does not meet on a regular basis, nor are the terms of appointees established. I have met and discussed issues concerning the PMT with Janet Onnen, Chris Brown, and Diane Dominguez. We all felt that it was time to review provisions of the establishing resolution with City Commission and seek direction on various items. The Parking Management Team reviewed staff recommendations and voted to present these to City Commission for consideration. They indicated that these changes would be beneficial until such time that a parking authority may be established. Direction Issues/Recommendations Should the PMT continue as a task team or be reestablished as a formal advisory board to City Commission with terms and limits like other boards i.e. maximum two (2) two year terms with monthly meetings. Should the PMT consist of ten (10) members with narrowly defined representation? · We recommend a seven (7) member board with representation as follows. (1) One member CRA (2) One member DDA (3) One member Planning and Zoning Board (4) One member from the OSSHAD District (5) One business owner - west of Swinton Avenue (6) One business owner - between Swinton and Intracoastal (7) One business owner - east of Intracoastal The CRA, DDA and P & Z Boards should recommend appointees; other membership should be selected the City Commission from a list of applicants. Terms would be staggered. · What should be the responsibilities of this board? We recommend that responsibilities continue as outlined in the original resolution. · Should the area within which the PMT operates be defined? We feel this area should be defined and would recommend boundaries if City Commission should direct this option. CRA is proposing boundaries that would include all of the CRA district, plus the area along A-1-A from N.E. 8th Street to Casurina. We recommend that proposed boundaries should coincide with those of the Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA--map attached), as well as the area along A-1-A within the CBD. This would include the entire CBD, as well as the West Atlantic Redevelopment Area and the beach business which are the locations that are generating most of the parking issues. areas, · Who should provide staff support for the PMT? We feel City staff as assigned by the City Manager should provide the administrative staff support with assistance provided by CRA staff. City staff support should also be provided to implem~ent____recommendations approved by City Commission. RAB/tas File:u:sweeney/agenda Doc:parkng. doc ! ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -t d"'"' ~ ~ ~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. 121-92 A RESOLUTION' OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, CREATING A PARKING MANAGEMENT TEAM FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPLEMENTING THE MASTER PARKING PLAN; PROVIDING FOR A MEMBERSHIP COMPO. SITION AND APPOINTMENT PROCESS; PROVIDING FOR THE APPLICABILITY OF SECTION 2.2.1 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE INITIAL SCOPE OF RESPONSIBILITY OF SAID PARKING MANAGEMENT TEAM; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, in addressing the subject of downtown parking, appointed a special Parking Study Committee in June of 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Parking Study Committee prepared a report entitled Master Parking Plan and presented said plan to the City Commission after review and comment by the Community Redevelopment Agency and the Planning and Zoning Board; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board determined the Master ParkiDq Plan not to be inconsistent with the City's adopted' Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Master Parkina Plan calls for the creation of a formal Parking Management Team and identifies activities with which the Team should be involved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That a Parking Management Team is hereby created for the purposes of carrying out and implementing the Master Parking Plan, and shall otherwise be charged with advising the City Commission concerning the planning, development, construction and operation of parking in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. Section 2. That the Parking Management Team is hereby created and shall have membership comprised of a representative of each of the following: (a) The Community Redevelopment Agency Board~ (b) The Downtown Development Authority Board (c) The Planning and Zoning Board ~ (d) The City Commission (e) The Chamber of Commerce ~, (f] A business operator or land owner representing the original Downtown Development Authority area (g) A business operator or land owner representing the expanded Central Business District area (h) A business operator or land owner representing the commercial Beach area (i) A business operator or land owner representing t~e West Atlantic Avenue area, east of 1-95 Section 3, Representatives shall be nominated, through the Community Redevelopment Agency, to the Delray Beach City Commission which shall make the actual appointments. Section 4, That the Parking Management Team shall be subject to the General Provisions (Section, ~.2.1) of Article 2.2 of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, except as modified by this Resolution. Section ~, That the Parking Management Team shall have clerical and logistic support from the Community Redevelopment Agency, on an interim basis, until such time as a permanent program for the ~aaministrative aspects of operations for the Team are established by action of the City Commission. Section 6. That the Parking Management Team shall undertake, as a first responsibility, the creation of its organization relationships including, but not limited to: ~ (a) method of interacting with the municipal departments which are involved in day-to-day traff£c operations; ~(b) method of making recommendations and obtaining implementation of Traffic Engineering, Parking Management, and Land Development Regulation Modifications~ and, [(c) manner in which the objectives of the Parking Trust Fund concept are to be obtained. Section ?. That until such time as the provisions of Section 6, above, are formally accepted by the City Commission, the Parking Management Team shall consider matters dealing with the planning, development, construction and operation of parking in the Master Parking. Plan Study Area and shall make recommendations regarding their disposition to the City Manager on a case-by-case basis. ~en City Commission action is requi=ed, the City Manager shall present such recommendations to the City Commission at their next regular meeting.. Section 8. That the Parking Management Team shall immediately convene and shall immediately pursue its assigned tasks. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 27th day of October, 1992. ~ Cit~ C~erk -- * - 2 - RES. NO. 121-92 RESOLUTION NO. 39-93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 121-92 WHICH CREATED A PARKING MANAGEMENT TEAM FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPLEMENTING THE MASTER PARKING PLAN, BY AMENDING SECTION 2 PERTAINING TO MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITION, TO INCLUDE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE OLD SCHOOL SQUARE HISTORIC ARTS DISTRICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on October 27, 1992, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, adopted Resolution No. 121-92 creating a Parking Management Team for the purpose of implementing the Master Parking Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 2 of said Resolution No. 121-92 sets forth the membership composition of the Parking Management Team, providing for representation from various areas and entities of the City of Delray Beach; and WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency Board of Commissioners has subsequently recommended that a representative from the Old School Square Historic Arts District be included on the Parking. Management Team; and WHEREAS, the City Commission concurs with said recommendation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 2 of Resolution No. 121-92 is hereby amended to read as follows: That the Parking Management Team is hereby created and shall have membership comprised of a representative of each of the following: (a) The Community Redevelopment Agency Board (b) The Downtown Development Authority Board (c) The Planning and Zoning Board (d) The City Commission (e) The Chamber of Commerce [f) A business operator or land owner representing the original Downtown Development Authority area (g) A business operator or land owner representing the expanded Central Business District area (h! A business operator or land Owner representing the commercial beach area (i) A business operator or land owner representing the West Atlantic Avenue area, east of 1-95 (j) A representative from the Old School Square Historic Arts District Section 2. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on'this the 13th day of April, 1993. ATTEST: .... ~ity C~rk PARKING MANAGEMENT TEAM Represcnring Member Felephone # CRA Board Rick Mouw >.76-9640 Mouw and Associates ~65-3886 fax 409 N.E. 3rd Street 33483 DDA Board Meg Eaton 364-5246 home Ruth Chagnon Dress Shop >-76-4921 work 1136 East Atlantic Avenue ~.76-8542 fax 33483 P & Z Robin Bird 1954) 786-4634 work 1300 Cormorant. Road South 1954) 786-4658 fax 33444 City Commissim~ Kevin Egm~ t98-6028 pager City of Dclray Beach 543-3774 fax 100 NW 1st Avenue 33444 Chamber of Commerce Bruce Gimmy :78-5626 The Trouser Shop 439 East Atlantic Avenue 33483 DDA Area h: lanes Onnen, Chairwoman ~8~83tJ~ (Land or Business Owner) Meisner Electric >-78-8397 fax 220 NE 1st Street 33444 Commercial Beach Area Monty Helm !72-2700 (Land or Business Owner) Defray Beach Yacht Club ~.78-0444 fax 100 MacFarland Drive 33483 West Atlantic Avenue No,ma Bannoura t99-8484 home (Land or Business Owner) 4130 NW 10th Street 394-9455 work 33445 *25-6461 pager Expanded CBD Armand Mouw 276-9640 (/~and or Business Owner) Mouw and Associates 265-3886 fax 409 NE 3rd Street 33483 OSSHAD District Joe Gillie 243-7922 Old School Square 243-8391 fax 51 North Swinton Avenue 33444 Staff P & Z ~~l~r ~-~/h~.~ 243-7321 City of Delray Beach 2-~3-7221 fax 100 NW 1st Avenue 33444 Police Department Officer Sherry Settelen ? 243-7390 City of Delray Beach 387-1839 pager Pineapple Grove Substation 243-7816 fax 189 N.E. 2nd Avenue 33444 CRA Christopher J. Brown 276-8640 Executive Director 276-8558 fax 24 N. Swinton Avenue 33444 CRA Diane Hervey 276-8640 Assistant to the Director 276-8558 fax 24 N. Swinton Avenue 33444 Revised 11/12/96 ',~0 37¢d ~21D HD~d38 ,',~21-13~i' 8§c, 8'322, T'3c, E,P:60 ,"E,~,T/80,,,"~,~.3 February ~.6, 1993 Downtown Development Authority Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Dear We are currently in the process of organizing the Parking Manag~n eat Team (PMT). By Resolution No. t2]_-92, the City Commission created the PMT for the pu~p~,se of implementing the Master parking Plan. The PMT is to consist of a total of nine mem~.Is with the Community Redevelopment Agency providing logistic and clerical support. Represent/hi~es shall be nominated, through the CRA, to the City Commission which shall make the actual appoint~n, rots. Membership of the team is to be comprised of a representative from each of the following: ~"'"(1) Tile CRA Board; (2) The DDA Board; · -"~3) The P & Z Board; (4) The City Commission; (51) The Chamber of Commerce; (6) A business operator or land owner representing the originaJ )ownto~tn Development Authority Area; (7) A business operator or land owner representing the expande~ .'entral Business District Al~ea; (8) A business opexator or land owner representing the commercial Beach Area; and, (9) A business operator or land owner representing the West At~ :tic Avenue area, east of Interstate 95. We are attempting to have the team appointments made by the City aission at its fixst regular meeting in March. In order to accomplish this, the CRA must review the non~ ations at its February 1993 regular meeting Please help us to meet this schedule by nominating a m~s tber of your o~ganization to serve on the team and ~orward that nomination to the CRA by February 2~, '1993_ Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions pleas ~eel free to contact Ron Hoggard or myself at 276-8640. Very Truly Yours. Christopher J. Brown Executive Director PART THREE: MASTER PARKING PROGRAM This Master Parking Program refers to the previous options analysis and offers improvements and policy recommendations based on PSC consensus and conclusions from other reports to meet existing and future parking needs. I. PARKING MANAGEMENT TEAM There are numerous parking options and regulation modifications, as well as a lack of singular focus in parking in Delray Beach. Therefore, the PSC recommends that the City Commission create a Parking Management Team (PMT) to provide leadership on parking decisions in the City. The PMT should be charged with the planning, development, construction and operation of parking in the Study Area. The PMT is in many respects a formal version of the existing PSC. It should be comprised of 9 members: a representative from the CRA, the DDA, the City Commission, the Chamber of Commerce (Atlantic 'Avenue Association), the Planning & Zoning Board; and a member-at-large representing from the Downtown, Beach, West Atlantic and Expanded CBD Areas. The members should be appointed by the City Commission and serve a term limit of approximately 2 years. This quasi - public/private advisory board could become an independent Parking Authority in the future. The CRA could be under contract as the lead agency in providing staff support and agenda setting to the PMT. It is the best choice of existing agencies because it is somewhat removed from city politics; it covers the entire Study Area; and it already takes a lead role in redevelopment projects, which warrant most new parking facilities. The CRA staff would also coordinate with City staff on parking issues. See Exhibit 9. Page33 MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden City Manager FROM: ¢I'~ Robert A. Barcinski Assistant City Manager DATE: October 23, 1997 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING OCTOBER 28. 1997 PARKING MANAGEMENT TEAM - CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION General The Parking Management Team has requested a workshop with City Commission to discuss and receive direction on short term recommendations presented to them by their parking consultant. These recommendations include: 1. Hiring a full time parking manager 2. Establishing a centralized valet parking system 3. Authorize on a temporary basis parking on unproved lots 4. Changing the 2m parking limits on Atlantic Avenue to 1 hour 5. Providing additional and stricter parking enforcement At their this last meeting on October 9, 1997 the PMT board voted to pass there recommendations on to City Commission. Our staff has reviewed these proposals and is providing comments as follows for Commission consideration. Staff Comments Hiring Full-time Parking Manager Based on the limited information provided to date concerning the job functions for this position, staff feels that the immediate responsibilities listed for this position could possibly be handled in house through assignment to a City staff member by the City Manager. Assignment and reporting requirements should be left to the City Manager. We do not feel that this person should be assigned enforcement responsibility. We also feel that if a full time person should be hired, the employee should be an employee of the City. Centralized Valet Parking Staff has no problems with this item. We do think that the following items need to be addressed in the RFP process. · Lot use/public-private · Queuing stations · Liability · Payment for lot use Page 2 Date: October 23, 1997 It is my understanding that Mr. Brown is working on this item. It will take sometime to develop the RFP, obtain proposals and make an award. Temporary Parking Lots Staff can support the use of temporary unimproved parking lots, provided that the approval is made on an annual basis, that certain design and landscape requirements are included, that the area these lots are allowed in is narrowly defined and that we can allow these lots without creating problems in other parts of the City. If Commission wished to proceed in this manner our LDR's and code will need to be changed and proceed through the regular review and approval process. Included are copies of standards used for temporary and provisional lots used in Miami Beach. One Hour Parking Limits on Atlantic Avenue Staff has no objections, however, I think we need to look at what it might take from an enforcement requirement. The change from 2 hours to 1 hour limits would require a code amendment. Additional and Stricter Enforcement We do not feel that enforcement has been lax. This function is handled by volunteers who are not paid to perform these tasks or go to court when subpoenaed. Efforts have been made to beef up enforcement. RAB/tas cc: Janet Onnen Chris Brown Bill Wood File:u:sweeney/agenda Doc:pmt.doc Community Redevelopment OCI Agency CITY Delray Beach October 1, 1997 Mr. David Harden City Manager City of Delray Beach 100 NW 1 st Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 RE: Parking Management Team/City Commission Workshop Dear Dave: The purpose of this letter is to request that City Commission's workshop with regard to the role of the Parking Management Team be postponed fi.om the agenda of october 14, 1997. The CRA staff as well as Janet Onnen, Marjofie Fen'er, and others will be attending the annual Florida Redevelopment Associafion/M~ Street conference at that time. Commissioner Egan will also be out of town. We would like to request a special workshop to take place on Tuesday, October 28, 1997. As you know, the Parking Management Team held a workshop with John Edwards, the parking consultant we contracted with to do a downtown study, on Saturday, September 27, 1997. It was Mr. Edwards' recommendation that we address the following critical items with City Commission as soon as possible: 1. A full-time parking manager 2. Valet parking contracts 3. Temporary parking lots 4. Changing 2-hour parking on Atlantic Avenue to 1-hour 5. Stricter enforcement of parking violations Please let me know if we can schedule a workshop with City Commission on October 28, 1997. for your assistance. Executive Director cc: Robert Barcinski 24 N. Swinton Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33444 (561) 276-8640 / Fax (561) 276-8558 Regular Meeting Parking Management Team October 9, 1997 Workshop Recommendations 1. Full-Time Parking Manager. The PMT recommends that the City Commission reconstitute the PMT as a fully empowered City board and provide a full-time parking manager under the supervision of one of the City departments, reporting directly to Robert Barcinski, Assistant City Manager. The duties and responsibilities of the parking manager are to carry outAhe ~recogunendations of the PMT Board, the City Commission and the City Manager. The man~e'-~'~'ag'~"e'/irwould carry out specifically the immediate action recommendations outlined below, namely, valet parking, establishing a tempor~aDcparki~dinance~,~ review of the hours of public parking, and, most importantly(b~e in charge of en~e~ .~ Valet Parking. The PMT recommends that the City Commission authorize the Assistant City Manager to issue a centralized valet parking contract "Request for Proposal" as soon as practicable. The City Planning Department and the CRA will assist the Assistant City Manager in preparing the RFP for approval by the City Commission. The PMT would provide prior approval as well as other downtown boards. The valet stations would be located on East Atlantic Avenue and both public and private lots would be secured for the required parking. 3. Temporary Parking Lots. The PMT recommends that the City Commission authorize the City Planning Department to write a revision to the Land Development Regulations allowing the use of vacant lots for parking on a temporary basis. The CBD zoning district would be the only area in which the temporary lots could be placed. The regulation would contain language that would provide for a one year use, renewable annually by the City Commission with recommended approval by the PMT and other CBD boards. There would be a minimum improvement standard. The use of temporary parking lots would be phased out as the City and CRA phase in more public spaces and the private sector provides additional spaces. The PMT would oversee the phasing out. 4. Changing 2-Hour Parking on Atlantic Avenue to 1 Hour. Parking consultant, John Edwards, made a convincing case for changing the time limit. Briefly, he stated that the on- street parking needs to be reserved for maximum turn-over. For those parkers who wish to stay longer in the downtown, they should park in the City and CRA lots behind buildings or on side streets. Enforcement will become an even more important issue with 1 hour limits on the avenue. 5. Stricter Enforcement of Parking Violations. This issue is key to parking management. Currently the volunteer force is doing a moderately good job, but as John Edwards pointed out, writing ten tickets a day is nothing to brag about. Summer enforcement is lax. A parking manager could be very important in enforcement. The enforcers, the volunteer force, must report to the manager. · ' PUBLIC ~I3RKS DEPT. Fax :305-673-702~ .Sep 10 '97 11:38 P. O1 Cit~ of Miami Beach PUBLIC W~N~K~ DEPARTMENT ] 700 Con~ention Center Drive Miam~ Beach, Florida 33]39 (3OS) 6Z3-ZO$O l:ttx: (305) 67'3- 7028 I:AX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET YOU SHOULD RECEIVE ~.6]~AGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SH£_~-T. IP YOU DO NOT P,.ECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (305) 673-7080. PUBLIC ~ORKS DEPT. Fax:305-6?3-7028 Sep l0 '97 11:38 P.02 F. ~ Adequate liShting shall bg provided. The lilhtinl shall bg artanl¢d and installed to minlmiz¢ glare on property in a residential district. Parkins t'n¢ilities shall b~ illuminated fr0m I/~ hour ~f~r sunset to 1/2 hour ~fore sunrise zt thc levels specified below with t uniformity ratio of 10:I: ~ ~IN~ ILLUM. R~sidfntial lots Commercial lots medium (11-99 sp~cc~) conform to th~ minimum ~nd~e Standards as s,t forth in Section ~. Tem~fv Pnrk{nt Lot Stzndnrd~_ When pcrmitled, the following Mtndards ~re establish~ for Temporary Parkln[ ~ 1. T,m~ry Commercial et noncommercial P~rkin[ ~ots may be in th~ ~ ~rinJ District, GU ~vernm~nt U~ ~isJri~t, ~E or !-4 ~istri~t~ Th~ ~ots m~y ~ o~rat~d ind~ndfnt o¢a primary Us~. Temporary, non-~m~ercial ~o~ m~y ~ l~ted in th~ R-PS.I-4 Ind in any multi-~zmJly r~identi~l district or within th~ AreEite~tural ~istrict as defined in ~tion 3-2,A oF this Ordinance. One Si~n per Street Frontage is ~rmitted. The maximum sizo o¢ ~h Sign sh,ll be five (5) square feet per Fifty (50) feet of Stte~t fron~gc. 2. Parkin~ Lots shall be brought lo Glade wi~h no less than one (1) inch asphalt Over a four (4) in~h llmerock b~; however, t~, Public Works Ditectpr may tequLre a six-inch limer~k ba~ or thicket asphalt ~d u~n ~onditions at the Site, the inte~ity of the Use at the Site or t~u:~ at~ inte~de~ to ~ parked ou tho Site that would reqult~ additional base sup~rc Prior to the ~ssuance of an Occu~tionzl L~cense ~or a Tem~ta~y ~rkinl Lot, the Applicant shall submit a maintenance and waterin~ plan which ~ approved by thc Planninl and ~nin8 Department. 3. Should the City Manager ~nd that the o~radon o~ a Tem~rary Parkin~ Lot has tn adver~ ~[fect on thc wcl~re o~ surroundini properties, b~ may revok~ the li~n~ pursuant to thc pr~cdures set ~orth in ~ction 27 o~ the ~zml ~ach City C~e u~n 4[ hour written not~fi~tion to the Applicant. 4. U~ of T~m~rary Parking Lo~ shall not b~ for parkinl which required by the ~in~ 5. All Lots considered under this Section shall ~ reviewed pursuant to thc D~iSn Review relut~tion~ 6. All Lots l~ated South of BJs~yne Street or located in a Residential Zoning District shall r{quir~ a public hearing ~ursuant to the 7.9 PUBLIC ~CRKS DEPT. Fax:]CS-6~-?028 3ep lO '97 t[:$8 P.O$ Conditional U~ procedures as set t'orth in Section 7, Prior to the iuuat~ce of tn Occupational License, a covenant runninl with the land which lists thc applicable requirements o; this Section ~ recorded in thc publi~ records O~ Dado County. Tem~raty Parkint Lo~ shill not be ~rmitt~d to ~xjst for a period time greater than three (3) yeats from the date o[ Buildin[ Permit i~uznce regardless o~ ownership. At the end of this period, i~ the ~ot continues to be used ~ot th~ pur~ses o~ parkln[, a permanent lot shall be constructed in con'or, ay with the Zoninl Ordinance; however, an Appl~nt ~y requ~t one extension of time for a ~rlod not ~zc~ed~ng two (2) years ~rom the P~nnini Botr~ 9. Ir thc Lot is paved and not o~ted on ~ valet basi~ then ~11 parkin8 sp~ ~hall ~ ~rked by painted line~ ~r curbs or other me, ut indicate individual spaces and wheel stops shall ~ provided. V~hlcles shall not back out onto any Strut. Thc s~ of the parkinl back-out areas tad cxit/inlcrJor drive~ shall not have dimensions than tho~c tequlrcd in ~ction 7~,A-D or the Zonin~ Ordinance. Lots op~rated on a valet ba~s shall have wheel st~ps ~t Ih~ edg~ o~ the pavcmen~ All ~heet s~o~ required in this subsection ~hal[ be placed no le~ than ~our (4) ~cct a~ay from each other. 10. Theve ~ail ~ n f~ve (5) f~t wide, landscaped irma borderin~ the surfaced arcz nloni a pro~rty line, Street Alley or sidewalk. The ~nd rear ar~s shall ~ lnndscnped with ctnopy trees (minimum o~ two (2) trees ~r F~fty (50) g~et oF Street and Alley frontnle). Al! ar~as ~11 utilize St. Au~tinc Gr~ or planted mater~al acceptable to the Planning and ~nin~ ~rtment. A two tad one ~1~(2~) ~oot h~gh hedge shall ~ pla~ed alon[ thc ~d~ and rear proper~y lines. 11. No interior l~nd~in0 is required; however, ail I~nd~apinS ~at placed on the ~t shall ~ maintained in [o~ ~ondition so as to prc~nt ~ hcslthy, ne~t and orderly ~ppcar~n~. 12. Water ~or irrisatJon shall ~ availabl~ within fifty (50) f~ct o~ all l~ndsczped area~. A h~e bib or an in-ground ay%tern is 13. Prior to ~he issuance or a ~uildin~ PetmiL the Planninl and Zoning ~partmenx shall approve the Site Plan and landscaping. Prior to is~uanc~ o~ an O~upetional License, the Department shall a~prove placement of land.aping. 14. Sur~a=e storm water shall not drain to ad,cent pro.ray or a public right- of-way. Ir the Public Works Director determines that there insu~fJeient area to accommodate drainsle, he may requir~ thal ~or every t,~0 square rcet or ~urrace patkin[ ar~. there sE~ll bc two (2) lwenty-~our (24) inch diameter round luler holes drilled to a depth two (2) Fc¢t below ~round water and Filled with rough, washing, ballast r~c~ broulht to within six (~) i~¢hes oF an a~ger hole inlet casting. 7. tO ' ' PUBLIC tC3RKS DEPT. Fax ::305-673-7028 '3ep tO '97 It :$9 P. 04 15. Any temporary parking lot that is non-conforming to these regulations six (6) months after the E£feotivc Date of this Ordinance ot upon the expiration date of an cx~stin! Occupational Liocnsc, whichever is later, shall c~use to exist. I. Provi~io~l Perkins Lot Standards. When ~rmittcd, th~ ~oiiowin~ standards arc ~stabllshed for ProviSional Parkins LOts: 1. Provisional Commercial or non-commercial Parking Lots may ~ operated in ~he ~1-3 (Comme~ci~i, Low to HaSh lnttnslt~) D~strlcts, I-1 (LiSht Industrial) District, ~nd ~E(~xed Use Entertainment) District. The~ Lots may bc operated indewndcnt o~ a primary U~. One Sisn ocr Street ~rontast is ~rmltted. Tb~ maximum slzc o~ each Sisn shall ~ ~ivc (~) ~uarc fcct per Piety (50) feet o[ Stree~ ~rontase, not to exceed t~nty (20) souare ~eeL ~ Provisional Perkins Lots shall ~ brousht to Grids with a dvst-Ftc~ surface of no less th~n two inches of crushed rook. Prior to thc issuan~ of an Occupational License ~or a Provisional Perkins Lot, thc A~licant shall submit a plan which addrcucs the r~aular maintenance and waterin[ of thc perkins, and landscaped surfaces; said plan shall be .. approved by thc Plannins and Zonin~ Detriment and monitored for compliance. 3. Should the City ~naser find that thc operation of a Provisional Parkinl Lo~ has zn adverse effect on tbs welfare or su~roundlng pro~rtie~ he m~y revok~ thc licen~ pursuant to thc procedures set forth in Section 20- 27 or the ~ami Beach City Code u~n 48 hour written noti[i~tion to thc Appli~nt. 4. Use of Provisional Parkin~ Lots shall 'not bc ~or parkinl which is rcffulred by the Zonlns Ordlnancc. 5. Provisions! ~rking Lots shall not b~ ~rmitted to exist ~or a period o~ time Ir~tct than. one (1) y~r from the date of Certificate o~ Completion, Cer~fi~tc o~ Occupancy, or O~u~tional License issuance (whichever ~cun first) rclardlcu of ownership. At thc end o[ this peri~, il the Lot continues to bc used for the pur~s o~ ~rkin[, a tcmpors~ or ~rman~nt Lot shall ~ constructed in conformity with the Zonini Ordinance; however, an Applicant may request one extension of time for n ~riod not cxcccdinl six (6) months ~tom ~he Pl~nninI and Zoning Director. Any further c~t~nsiou of time is prohlbitcd. 6. I~ the Lot is not operated on a valet basis, then all parkinI spaces shall be marked by painted lin~ or curbs or other means to indicts individual spaces and wheel stops shall ~ provldcd. Vehicles shall not back out onto any Street. The size of the parkin~ spaccL beck-out irc~s and exit/interior ~riv~ shall not have dimensions less than those required in Section 7.5,A-~ o~ th~ Zoninl Ordln~nce. Lots operated on a viler basis shall have wheel stops at thc edit o~ the parking surface. Ail wheel stops required in this subsection shall,~ placed no less than rout (4) fee: away ~rom ~ach other. 7.11 PIJBL1'C klOI;~<S DEPT. ~ax :,305-673-7028 Sep 10 'g7 11 :~g P. 05 7. There shall be I 2 ft. 6 in. wide, landscaped area bordcrin$ the surt'aced area sion[ all property lines. All landscaped arets s~all util;z~ St. Aulustin¢ Gra. or ~lantCd material a~ptable ~o thc Plannini and Zonin~ ~ep~r~ment. ~ two and one hal~ (2~) foot hil~ ~ed~e %hall be p~accd alon~ ~11 ~ro~rty linc~ Facln~ a Street. Water ~or irrigation ~e available ~{thin fifty (~0) f~et o~ ~lt I~n4scn~d trc~s. A ho~ bib or ~. Prior to tb~ ~usnce o~ I Buildin[ Permit, thC Planninl and Zonin[ ~partmcnt shall ~pprovc t~¢ Sit~ Plan and l~ndscap~n~. Prio~ to the issuance of nn ~p~tionzl License, the Department shall approve the placement o~ lands~pln~ O. Surf tee storm water drtlnas~ shall be approved by thc Public Works ~ircctor. 10. ~o variances shall ~ ~rantcd ~rom the requirements of this Section. 1 I. At the time thc Provisions) ParkJn[ Lot ceases to exist, ali crusbe~ material sb~ll be removed within thirty (30) days replaced .with sod tad/or Itudscapini tsdctcrmined ~cccptabl~ by thc Plannins and Zonins Department. This provision shall not apply to cxistin8 lots where crushed rock was lejzlly in pl~cc at thc time o~ thc passa~c o~ this ordinance. 7-6 OFF-STREET ~OADIM~ SPACE Wheo uny Buildin8 oF Structure is erected, structurally tltcrcd, or converted i~ Usc. tccc~ory Of~-Strcct Load{ag So~c~ shall bc provided For the BuildinS, Structure, additional Floor Arcn or new Usg in accordance with thc Foliowins schedule: A. For each retail store, de~rtment store, ~taur~nt, whol~ale house, warghou~, repair, Icncral sc~icc, manufacturin8 or industrial establishment, or similar Use, which has an eg8relate Fl~r Area in square Fcct o~: 1. Ovcr 2,000 but not over ~0,000 I space ~: Over t0,0~ bu,.not over ~0,000 2 SpaCe.~ . .. 3. Over.20,0~ but not over 40,000 3 spaces 4. Over 40,0~ but nsc over ~,000 4 spaces 5. For each additiona~ 50,~0 over 60,~0 I space BARRIER ISLAND REUSE WATER PROPOSAL INITIAL PROBLEM: · High irrigation demand on Barrier Island. Per current Utility Billing records, demand exceeds 1.S MGD. PROPOSAL FOR SOLUTION: · Explore use of Reuse Water for irrigation on Barrier Island. KEY TO VIABILITY: · Access to treated effluent via South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board's Ocean Outfall. RESULTS: · Feasibility Study for Barrier Island Reuse Facility presented September, 1995. · Provision of Reuse Water Facility on Barrier Island for irrigation use. BARRIER ISLAND REUSE FACILITY ANCHOR PARK LOCATION PHASE I SER VIGE AREA: · Gulfstream Golf Course · Little Club Golf Course · St. Andrews Golf Course PHASE II SER VICE AREA · Barrier Island Public Access - George Bush Boulevard to Linton Boulevard · Gulfstream Public Access - George Bush Boulevard to Briny Breezes Boulevard CUSTOMER BASE/RA TE STRUCTURE CONTROLS: · City Ordinance · Interlocal Agreement · Private Agreement PROJECT STATUS CURRENT PROBLEM: · Limited,availability of sites for facility. PROPOSAL FOR SOL UTION: · Explore potential for facility location west of Intracoastal Waterway. KEY TO VIABILITY: · Availability of existing Intracoastal Waterway pipe crossing. RESULTS: · Proposed Reuse Facility west of Intracoastal Waterway to serve Barrier Island irrigation demand. · Facility expandable to provide Reuse Water for public access as far west as 1-95. EASTERN REUSE FACILITY N.E. 3RD AVENUE/3RD STREET LOCATION PHASE I SER VICE AREA: · Barrier Island Public Access - George Bush Boulevard to Linton Boulevard PHASE II SER VICE AREA: · Eastern City public access - 1-95 to Intracoastal Waterway S. 10th Street to Lake Ida Road CUSTOMER BASE/RATE STRUCTURE CONTROLS: · City Ordinance ALTERNATIVE COST COMPARISON Treatment Facili _ty Location East of Intracoastal West of Intracoastal Waterway Waterway Land Acquisition $0.00 $195,000.00 Divert Pumping $415,000.00 $0.00 Treatment/Storage $2,175,000.00 $1,925,000.00 Reuse Transmission $1,021,185.00 $1,697,200.00 Reuse Distribution $1,710,500.00 $1,060,600.00 Total $5,321,685.00 $4,877,800.00 25% Contingency $1,330,421.00 $1,219,450.00 Total Estimated Cost $6,652,106.00 $6,097,250.00 Phase I Cost $4,513,981.00 $6,097,250.00 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES Connection Fees $2,600,000.00 Grants (South Florida Water Management District) $300,000.00 Bonds/Financing $3,200,000.00 Total $6,100,000.00 EXAMPLE RATE STRUCTURE Cun'ent Rate Structure Potable Irrigation Flat Fee $9.17 $9.17 Usage $1.05/1000 gallons (minimum) $1.16/1000 gallons (fiat) Annual Revenue at $0.50/1000 .gallon Capacity Charge 2 mgd x 0.50/1000 x 365 $365,000.00 Estimated annual Operations and Maintenance $125,000.00 Balance of Uncommitted Revenue $240,000.00 EAST VS. WEST BENEFITS OF WESTERL Y LOCA TION: · Facility Location Industrial Area vs. Prime Recreation/Residential · Flexibility Not limited to Barrier Island · Cost More up-front but less overall PROS AND CONS OF REUSE Highly effective Water Conservation method. · Increas6 Wastewater Treatment Plant Outfall capacity. · Decrease Water Treatment Plant Demand. · Defer or delete Water Treatment Plant expansion due to increased capacity. · Provide less expensive irrigation water for customers. · Minimize need for water restrictions for irrigation during dry season. · Will be financially self sufficient. CONS · Cost. · Not mandated. · Additional construction inconvenience for residents. · Potential decrease in overall Water and Sewer Revenues. COMMISSION DIRECTION Viable Project - Pursue Implementation NO YES No Further Action Reuse Ordinance Finance Alternatives Land Acquisition MEETING OF: OCTOBER 28, '1997 AGENDA ITEM: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, ELIMINATING A MAXIMUM DENSITY RESTRICTION ON RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS WITHIN CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) The purpose of scheduling this item on the workshop agenda is to allow for a preliminary discussion of a proposed LDR amendment dealing with residential densities in the CBD. The amendment is scheduled to be considered on first reading at the regular meeting of November 4, 1997; however, due to its significance it was felt that a workshop discussion would also be appropriate. As a result of the revitalization efforts that have been made in the downtown, the CBD has become a vibrant shopping and entertainment district, with restaurants and clubs, art and antique dealers, and quality retailers. One essential component to a sustainable downtown which continues to be deficient, however, is the construction of residential dwelling units. Residential development must be attracted to the downtown to ensure its long term viability. This factor has long been recognized by the CRA, the City Commission, and members of the community who have worked to revitalize the area. However, the development community has been slow to respond to the opportunities to create residential units in the CBD, for a number of reasons. Providing new housing in the downtown is especially difficult due to the problems and the costs involved in assembling sufficient land. It has also become apparent that these problems are exacerbated by the existing limitations on density, as described below. Current Reoulations Residential dwelling units are permitted in the downtown area at a density of 30 units per acre, excluding the area east of N.E. 7th Avenue (which was previously identified as the Coastal High Hazard Area--this has since been changed to the Intracoastal Waterway) where it is limited to 12 units per acre. City Commission Workshop Meeting of 10/28/97 Proposed Amendments to the LDRs Regarding Densities in the CBD Page 2 There has been recent interest shown by developers in establishing quality residential development in the downtown, however, the density limitations have been identified as an impediment. The case of the renovation of the Huber Drugs building on East Atlantic Avenue is a good example. The owner applied to convert the second floor of the building to eleven (11) dwelling units, but was restricted by the density limits to four (4). The remainder of the space must continue to be used as office, even though he has had a great deal of interest from residential tenants. This is contrary to all of the efforts that have been made to date to encourage residents living downtown. Similarly, developers have approached the CRA about constructing new residential buildings, but have found that the density limits don't allow for enough units to make the projects viable. In most cases the projects will be limited to small sites, (perhaps as small as an acre or two) due to the limited available land, and it does not make economic sense to incur the costs of developing projects having 30 or so units. At the City Commission meeting of September 23, 1997, Mayor Alperin noted his concerns regarding these difficulties, and asked staff to determine if the regulations could be addressed in order to facilitate the creation of dwelling units in the downtown area. At the Planning and Zoning Board worksession of October 13, 1997, staff proposed the idea of eliminating density restrictions altogether in the CBD, for the following reasons: · The dwelling unit per acre approach is more of a suburban concept, where it is applied to vacant land on a gross acreage basis, and land for roads and open space is then extracted from the total. Cities with urban centers typically do not use the unit per acre concept for their downtowns, where public roads, infrastructure, and open space areas already exist. · The maximum density that is achievable in the CBD is already limited by height (no more than 60 feet), setbacks, minimum unit sizes (which were recently increased), parking requirements, and where applicable, open space requirements. These provisions have the effect of limiting the mass and scale of buildings in the downtown. If we are willing to live with these limitations for nonresidential structures, they should be sufficient parameters for residential buildings, regardless of the number of dwelling units that they contain. · Due to the unique character of the Central Business District, the separate impacts of residential, commercial, and office development are less relevant than the overall impacts of the development mix. Controls should, then, be focused on the gross intensity of development in the district rather than the net density of a particular use within the development mix. Within the Central Business District the density of residential development on a particular site is less relevant than the establishment and maintenance of a sustainable mix of uses which provide for a balance of dwelling units, services, and employment opportunities in a compact area. City Commission Workshop Meeting of 10/28/97 Proposed Amendments to the LDRs Regarding Densities in the CBD Page 3 The P & Z Board members expressed support for the concept of removing maximum residential density requirements, but only for the core of the CBD--that is, the first two blocks north and south of Atlantic Avenue (west of the Intracoastal). They also felt that there should be some basic limits on the mix of unit types. In particular, they felt that the percentage of efficiency and studio type units should be restricted. The proposed amendment would affect the number of dwelling units per acre, as well as unit types. Within the Central Business District, between Swinton Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway, and between NE 2nd Street and SE 2nd Street, the limitation on residential density would be eliminated. The portion of the Central Business District located east of the Intracoastal Waterway (as opposed to east of N.E. 7th Avenue) is excluded from this proposal, in that it lies in the Coastal High Hazard Area. Within this area, state regulations prohibit reductions in hurricane evacuation times, which is most affected by the number of residents. The residential density of this portion of the district will remain at twelve (12) units per acre. Those portions of the Central Business District north of NE 2nd Street and south of SE 2nd Street would maintain the 30 unit per acre limitation. In these areas, the CBD narrows significantly, forming a corridor centered on Federal Highway, between mostly residential established neighborhoods. The corridors are relatively remote from Atlantic Avenue, and at the fringe of the "compact urban core" of the traditional downtown. Due to these Iocational considerations, residential density controls should be retained to assure compatibility with surrounding land uses. The quality of residential development is also vital to the long-term success of downtown redevelopment. One measure of quality is a reasonable mix of unit sizes and their respective rents or values. Residential development in the downtown should attract a stable, year-round population that will contribute substantially to the economy of the downtown and the City. Therefore, it is appropriate to limit the proportion of efficiency apartments in favor of larger units. A limitation of 25% for efficiency units should produce such a reasonable mix of units sizes. However, this limitation is only applied to larger projects, in order to allow additional flexibility for second floor conversions and smaller redevelopment projects. The Planning and Zoning Board took action on the proposed amendments at the regular meeting of October 20, 1997. Some minor changes were suggested regarding the proportion of efficiency units. With those changes, the Board recommended unanimously that the amendments be adopted. · Attachment: Proposed LDRAmendment PROPOSED LDR AMENDMENT Section 4.4.13 Central Business (CBD) District (H) Special Regulations: (1) The sale of second hand material, other than verifiable antiques, shall not be allowed within businesses which have an entry from and/or windows along East Atlantic Avenue. [Amd. Ord. 58-90 12/11/90] (2) The picking-up, dropping-off, or otherwise transporting workers, assigned through an employment agency, from an assembly point in the CBD to the work site is prohibited. (3) The maximum density for residential dwelling units in that portion of the Central Business District (CBD) within the Coastal High Hazard Area, which lies east of Intracoastal Waterway_ ,,.,_. ~'' ~- -/*~'..,, .A..,,,,,.v, ....... is 12 units per acre. The maximum density for residential dwelling units in those portions of the Central Business District which lie north of N.E. 2nd Street and south of S.E. 2nd Street. respectively, thc rome!rider cf thc CgD is 30 units per acre. In the remainder of the Central Business District. maximum density requirements for residential dwelling units shall not a.D.Dly, [Amd. Ord. 80-95 12/5/95] (4) Minimum floor area for multi-family residential dwelling units shall be as established for the Medium Density Residential (RM) zoning district in Section 4.3.4(K). [Amd. Ord. 80-95 12/5/95] (5) Free-standing structures, containing only residential uses, shall not be located on properties fronting Atlantic Avenue. [Amd. Ord. 80-95 12/5/95] (6) In both new and renovated multi-family and mixed-use development .Dro.iects which have more than twenty (20) ~lnits. the pro.portion of efficiency or studio type units shall be limited to 25%. In projects having twenty (20) or fewer units, the proportion of efficiency or studio tyDe units shall be less than 100%,