Loading...
11-13-12 Special Workshop AgendaCITY COMMISSION CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING -TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2012 6:00 P.M. DELRAY BEACH CITY HALL The City will furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Contact Doug Smith at 243-7010, 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA Pursuant to Section 3.12 of the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Mayor Nelson S. McDuffie has instructed me to announce a Special Meeting of the City Commission to be held for the following purposes: 1. CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTS/ATLANTIC PLAZA II: Consider approval to increase the building height to a maximum of 60 feet (59 feet 4 inches proposed) and to allow a density increase above 30 dwelling units per acre (51.10 du/ac proposed) for Atlantic Plaza II, which is a proposed mixed-use development north of Atlantic Avenue, south of N.E. 1st Street, east of N.E. 6th Avenue, and west of Veterans Park. (Quasi-Judicial Hearing) WORKSHOP AGENDA 1. Proposed Partnership with the YMCA of South Palm Beach County 2. Financial Review Board Recommendations regarding Delray Beach Memorial Gardens Municipal Cemetery 3. State and Federal Lobbying Services 4. Discussion regarding Pension Fund Management 5. Policy on Naming of Public Facilities 6. Commission Comments Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, such person will need to ensure that a verbatim record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. The City neither provides nor prepares such record. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Scott Pape, AICP, FCP, Senior Planner Paul Dorling, AICP, Director of Planning and Zoning THROUGH: City Manager DATE: November 5, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM SP.1 -SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2012 CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTS/ATLANTIC PLAZA II ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION The action requested of the City Commission is consideration of conditional use requests to increase the building height to a maximum of 60 feet (59 feet 4 inches proposed) and to allow a density increase above 30 dwelling units per acre (51.10 du/ac proposed) for Atlantic Plaza II, which is a proposed mixed use development north of Atlantic Avenue, south of N.E. 1st Street, east of N.E. 6th Avenue, and west of Veterans Park. BACKGROUND The project area consists of the existing Atlantic Plaza, all of Block 116 of the Town of Delray subdivision (Block west of NE 7 th Avenue) and the NE 7th Avenue right-of-way between Atlantic Avenue and NE 1st Street (8.65 acres total). Block 116 contains three buildings that were constructed between 1962 and 1979. These buildings contain office, retail, and auction house uses. The gasoline station and multiple family buildings previously located at the northeast corner of Atlantic Avenue and NE 6th Avenue have been demolished. The site plan for the existing Atlantic Plaza was approved in 1984 with a total building area of 80,000 square feet, which was later reduced to 78,248 square feet. There were 261 parking spaces required for the approved building area. Since only 206 spaces were provided on site, the developer entered into an agreement with the City to either provide the remaining required spaces in an off-site parking lot, or pay in-lieu fees for the 56 space deficit. On August 26, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Board approved a conditional use request for an off-site parking lot at the northeast corner of NE 1st Street and NE 7th Avenue to address this deficiency. At its meeting of October 20, 2008, the Planning and Zoning Board considered and recommended approval of a development proposal for an increase to the maximum building height of 60 feet for a mixed use project. At its meeting of December 9, 2008, the City Commission approved the conditional use to increase the building up to a maximum height of 60 feet. This mixed use development contained six buildings with 89,126 square feet of retail floor area, 29,709 square feet of restaurant floor area, and 111,628 square feet of office area. The residential component of the development consisted of 197 dwelling units (19 townhomes and 178 condominiums). A new development application has been submitted that includes the constructionof two (2) five-story buildings; two (2) four-story buildings; and two (2) three-story buildings. The commercial component of the development consists of 52,021 square feet of retail; 28,204 square feet of restaurant; and 79,071 square feet of office. The residential portion of the development includes 442 dwelling units comprised of 70 efficiency unit; 151 one-bedroom units; 208 two-bedroom units; and 13 three-bedroom units. At its meeting of September 24, 2012 the Planning and Zoning Board considered the conditional use requests associated with this development proposal and voted to postpone the applications. The Planning and Zoning Board directed the applicant to address traffic, transportation management, access to Veteran’s Park (special emphasis on emergency vehicle access), and the impact of vehicles on the residential neighborhood to the north. Several of the Board members indicated that LEED certification should be sought for the proposed development. The pedestrian connections and general walk-ability of the project was also emphasized as a concern. The applicant revised the plans and eliminated the fifth floor of building IV, which is the one nearest Veteran’s Park. The site was also redesigned to improve the vehicular access to the garages. The applicant has agreed to contribute the cost of a shuttle bus to the City to address transportation management concerns. At its meeting of October 15, 2012, the Planning and Zoning Board re-considered the conditional use application and recommended approval to the City Commission. The Board unanimously recommended approval of the conditional use request to increase the building height. The Board voted 4 to 3 (Pierre-Louis, Lynch and Durden dissenting) to recommend approval of the conditional use request to increase the residential density. Those Board members in dissent expressed concerns with respect to the impacts on the adjacent residential neighborhood from the increased intensity of the project. RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: 1. Move to approve the conditional use request to allow for a building height in excess of 48’ (59’ 4” proposed) for Atlantic Plaza II, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request, and approval thereof, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(E)(5), 4.3.4(J)(4)(b), 4.4.13(I), and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations; 2. Move to approve the conditional use request to allow for a density in excess of 30 units per acre (51.10 du/ac) for Atlantic Plaza II, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request, and approval thereof, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(E)(5), 4.4.13(I), and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations; With said approvals to be subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of a site plan by SPRAB that is in general conformance to the submitted sketch plan. 2. That any potential conflicts at the circular driveway as it relates to multiple functions be addressed during the site plan review process. 3. That the applicant contributes the cost of a shuttle bus to the City and details of a shuttle stop in the development be finalized during the site approval process. 4. That modification to NE 7th Avenue and NE 1st Street and/or funding of a traffic signal at NE 6th Avenue and NE 1st Street is considered during site plan approval to reduce concerns over encroachment into the neighborhoods from this site. 5. That a written finding of concurrency approval from the School District be submitted. 6. That provision of the bus shelter and easement is addressed during the site plan review process. 7. That a minimum of two additional bicycle racks be provided along Federal Highway and two along Atlantic Avenue. 8. That the provision of workforce housing units be addressed per an agreement to be approved by the Community Improvement Director and executed prior to certification of the site plan. 9. That a minimum of 75% of the surface area of the front street walls along Atlantic Avenue at the ground floor area of buildings I and II are devoted to display windows and to entrances. 10. That a dedication of 7 feet be provided for Atlantic Avenue east of NE 7th Avenue. 11. That at least one building achieves the designation as “LEED for Neighborhood Development (certified).” 1 IN THE CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA CONDITIONAL USE MODIFICATION REQUEST FOR ATLANTIC PLAZA II ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 1. This conditional use request to increase the building height to a maximum of 60 feet and to increase the residential density of the project to 51.10 dwelling units per acre for the Atlantic Plaza II development has come before the City Commission on November 13, 2012. 2. The Applicant and City staff presented documentary evidence and testimony to the City Commission pertaining to the conditional use request for the Atlantic Plaza II development. All of the evidence is a part of the record in this case. Required findings are made in accordance with Subsections I and II. I. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN a. Comprehensive Plan -Future Land Use Element Objective A-1: This objective requires that the property shall be developed or redeveloped as it pertains to height, in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is complementary to adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs. Is this objective met? Yes No ___ b. Future Land Use Map: The resulting use of land or structures must be allowed in the zoning district within which the land is situated and said zoning must be consistent with the applicable land use designation as shown on the Future Land Use Map. The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Commercial Core and is zoned Central Business District. Future Land Use -Is project’s proposed location consistent with the Future Land Use Map? 2 Yes______ No___ _ c. Concurrency: Facilities which are provided by, or through, the City shall be provided to new development concurrent with issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. These facilities shall be provided pursuant to levels of service established within the Comprehensive Plan. Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Are the concurrency requirements met as respect to water, sewer, drainage, streets and traffic, parks, open space, solid waste and schools? Yes______ No______ d. Consistency : Will the granting of the conditional use be consistent with and further the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? Yes ______ No_______ e. Policy C-4.1: The CBD zoning district regulations shall facilitate and encourage rehabilitation and revitalization and shall, at a minimum, address the following: Deletion of inappropriate uses; Incentives for locating retail on the ground floor with office and residential use on upper floors; Accommodating parking needs through innovative actions; Incentives for dinner theaters, playhouses, and other family oriented activities; Allowing and facilitating outdoor cafes; Incentives for mixed use development and rehabilitation; Elimination of side yard setback requirements; and Allow structural overhang encroachments into required yard areas. Is this policy met? Yes _______ No_______ 3 f. Transportation Element Policy A-1.3: The City endorses the continued operations of the Palm Tran Transit System and its operations in Delray Beach, and through policies of this Element related to the TCEA, will coordinate with Palm Tran to improve the system. Is this policy met? Yes _______ No_______ g. Transportation Element Policy D-2.2: Bicycle parking and facilities shall be required on all new development and redevelopment. Particular emphasis is to be placed on development within the TCEA Area. Is this policy met? Yes _______ No_______ h. Open Space and Recreation Element Policy A-3.1: Tot lots and recreation areas serving children from toddlers to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Is this policy met? Yes _______ No_______ i. Housing Element Objective B-2: Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City’s demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in this Element. Policies, which will implement this objective, include: 1. Housing Element Policy B-2.2: The development of new adult oriented communities within the City is discouraged. New housing developments 4 shall be designed to accommodate households having a range of ages, especially families with children, and shall be required to provide three (3) and four (4) bedroom units and activity areas for children ranging from toddlers to teens. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential development located in the downtown area and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. 2. Housing Element Policy B-2.6: Housing in and near the downtown area, in close proximity to employment opportunities and services, is a critical need. In order to help stimulate demand for new housing in and around the Central Business District, the development of new rental housing projects outside of the TCEA and North Federal Highway area is discouraged. 3. Housing Objective A-12: To assist residents of the City in maintaining and enhancing their neighborhood environment, the City shall take steps to ensure that modifications in and around the neighborhood do not lead to its decline, such as those described in the following policies. 4. Housing Policy A-12.3: In evaluating proposals for new development or redevelopment, the City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Are these policies met? Yes _______ No_______ II. LDR REQUIREMENTS: a. LDR Section 2.4.5(E) Required Findings: (Conditional Use): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(E)(5), in addition to provisions of Chapter 3, the conditional use will not: i. Have a significantly detrimental effect upon the stability of the neighborhood within which it will be located; ii. Hinder development or redevelopment of nearby properties. Will Section 2.4.5(E)(5) be met? Yes _______ No________ b. Increase in Height. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(J)(4)(b)(i)(9), an increase to a maximum height of 60’ may be approved by the City Commission as a 5 conditional use for property within the Central Core portion of the CBD (Central Business District), except for that portion within 150’ of any zoning district which has a maximum height limit of 35’, measured from the property line of the CBD zoned property. The City Commission may approve an increase in height to a maximum height of 60’ based upon a finding of compliance with each of the enumerated criteria listed below: (ii) That the increase in height will not provide for, nor accommodate, an increase in the floor area (within the structure) beyond that which could be accommodated by development which adheres to a height limitation of 48 feet, except for the following situations: (1) An increase in height is allowed when the increase from 48 feet to 60 feet is for the purpose of accommodating residential use on the top floor of the structure; however, the increase in height is only for the added residential use area. (iii)Workforce housing units, equal to at least twenty percent (20%) of the residential units on the top floor, shall be provided within the development onsite, offsite, or through monetary contributions as referenced in Article 4.7 (fractions shall be rounded up). The workforce housing units shall be at the low or moderate income levels and shall comply with other applicable provisions of Article 4.7. (iv) That the increase in height shall be allowed if two or more of subsections 4.3.4(J)(iv)(1), (2) or (3) are met: (1) That for each foot in height above 48 feet, an additional building setback of two feet is provided from the building setback lines which would be established for a 48-foot tall structure. The additional setback is required from all setback liens (i.e., front, side, and rear) for the portion of the building that extends above 48 feet. In lieu of this setback requirement, buildings in the CBD zone shall adhere to the setback requirements of that district; (2) That a minimum of 50% of the ground floor building frontage consist of nonresidential uses (excluding parking); 6 (3) That open areas, such as courtyards, plazas, and landscape setbacks, be provided in order to add interest and provide relief from the building mass. Are these requirements met? Yes _______ No_______ c. Increase in Density. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(I), an increase in density greater than 30 dwelling units per acre may be approved by the City Commission as a conditional use for property within the Central Core portion of the CBD, provided that 20% of the residential units above 30 dwelling units per acre in the commercial core shall be workforce housing units. The workforce housing units shall be divided between low and moderate income levels and shall be provided either onsite, offsite or through a monetary contribution. 1. The applicable performance standards for development under this section are met as follows: (a) The development offers variation in design to add interest to the elevations and relief from the building mass. (b) If the building includes a parking garage as an associated structure or within the principal building, the garage elevation provides unified design elements with the main building through the use of similar building materials and color, vertical and horizontal elements, and architectural style. (c) A number of different unit types, sizes and floor plans are available within the development. Two and three bedroom units are encouraged, as are a combination of multi-level units and flats. In projects consisting of more than twelve (12) dwelling units, the proportion of efficiency or studio type units may not exceed 25% of the total units. (d) The project design shall create an overall unified architectural character and image by the use of common elements between the building(s), parking lot, and landscaping. 7 (e) The development provides common areas and/or amenities for residents such as swimming pools, exercise rooms, storage rooms or lockers, covered parking, gardens, courtyards or similar areas and/or amenities. (f) The development promotes pedestrian movements by providing convenient access from the residential units to the public sidewalk system. (g) The development provides opportunities to share parking, accessways, driveways, etc., with adjoining properties, or provides additional parking spaces that may be used by the public. (h) Projects fronting on Atlantic Avenue, NW/SW 5th Avenue, NE 1st Street or SE 1st Street contain nonresidential uses on the ground floor. At least 75% of the surface area of the front street wall(s) at the ground floor area of each such building is devoted to display windows and to entrances to commercial uses from outside the building. (i) The landscape plan for the development preserves and incorporates existing native vegetation (where available), provides new landscaping that is in excess of minimum standards (in height and quantity), demonstrates innovative use of plant material, improves site design, provides useable open space or public plazas, and maximizes available areas for pedestrian interaction. Are these requirements met? Yes _______ No_______ 3. The comments and notes set forth in the staff report are hereby incorporated herein. 4. The City Commission has applied the Comprehensive Plan and LDR requirements in existence at the time the conditional use request was submitted. 5. The City Commission finds there is ample and competent substantial evidence to support its findings in the record submitted and adopts the facts contained in the record including but not limited to the staff reports, testimony of experts and other competent witnesses supporting these findings. 8 6. Based on the entire record before it, the City Commission approves ____ denies ____ the conditional use request set forth above subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and hereby adopts this order this 13th day of November, 2012, by a vote of _____ in favor of denial and _____ opposed. _____________________________ Nelson S. McDuffie, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Chevelle Nubin City Clerk EXHIBIT A TO THE CONDITIONAL USE MODIFICATION REQUEST FOR ATLANTIC PLAZA II 1. Approval of a site plan by SPRAB that is in general conformance to the submitted sketch plan. 2. That a written finding of concurrency approval from the School District be submitted. 3. That the location of the bus shelter and easement is addressed during the site plan review process. 4. That a minimum of two additional bicycle racks be provided along Federal Highway and two along Atlantic Avenue. 5. That the provision of workforce housing units be addressed per an agreement to be approved by the Community Improvement Director and executed prior to certification of the site plan. 6. That a minimum of 75% of the surface area of the front street walls along Atlantic Avenue at the ground floor area of buildings I and II are devoted to display windows and to entrances. 7. That a dedication of 7 feet be provided for Atlantic Avenue east of NE 7th Avenue PALM TRAIL HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC. 424 Palm Trail Delray Beach, Florida 33483 October 31, 2012 Mr. Scott D. Pape, Senior Planner Planning and Zoning Department 100 N.W. 1st Avenue City of Delray Beach, FL 33444 RE: Atlantic Plaza II – Closure of NE 7th Avenue at NE 1st Street Dear Mr. Pape: Please accept this letter on behalf of the residents of the Palm Trail Homeowners Association, Inc. Along with an additional statement specific to the closure of NE 7th Avenue at NE 1st Street, we submit to you a recent resolution approved by the Board of the PTHOA. Please make this statement a part of the official record that will be considered by the Site Plan and Review Board for the Atlantic Plaza II project. More urgently, we would also appreciate having this statement included in the City Commission consideration of the conditional uses, which is slated for November 6, 2012. The current proposal for Atlantic Plaza II, as presented privately to us and publicly to the Planning & Zoning Board, is not congruent with the profile of the City or with our neighborhood. Furthermore, this project will directly impact our neighborhood causing excessive traffic and congestion due to the density and magnitude approved, resulting in the disruption of our peace and tranquility. To protect our neighborhood from the excessive traffic and parking overflow from this development, we respectfully request the installation of a barrier to block traffic on the north side of the proposed traffic circle at NE 7th Ave and NE 1st St., which the developer has agreed to fund. This landscaped barrier would not allow traffic flow into our neighborhood via NE 7th Ave, but it would allow pedestrian, bicycle, or golf cart passage. We are not opposed to developing this area bordered by the Intracoastal, Northeast 6th Avenue (east/west), and Atlantic Avenue and Northeast 1st Street (south/north). We are opposed to the size and density of this proposed project in relation to the size and location of this parcel. This project does not complement the existing style, density and proportion of the area and it needs to be revised. It is our position that this parcel is a critical commerce area, and we agree this area needs to be re‐developed into a viable development for the benefit of the City and for all adjacent neighborhoods, adding to the value of the whole area without detracting from any one area. October 31, 2012 Palm Trail HOA, Inc. Page Two We are willing to work with the developers, City officials and any related and informed parties in order to create a compatible and complimentary commerce center for the benefit of all. Thank you for your assistance in making this PTHOA statement a part of the official record. Respectfully yours, Palm Trail Homeowners’ Association, Inc. /as 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Michelle Quigley <michquig@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 4:09 PM To: Jacquet, Al Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: The Atlantic Plaza project Dear Commissioner Jacquet, My name is Michelle Quigley. My husband and I have lived on NE 1st Court, one block away from Atlantic Plaza, since 1989, and our two sons have lived here since they were born, in 1995 and 1999. I am writing to express my deep concern over the new plans to redevelop Atlantic Plaza and the surrounding properties. My neighbors and I have had a lot of experience dealing with various plans for Atlantic Plaza over the past several years. This latest proposal is the largest and worst we have seen yet. It is completely out of scale with the adjacent neighborhood and the rest of downtown. The buildings are too tall for this part of Delray and the density is too great. In 2005, residents packed City Hall to complain that the project was too dense when Carl DeSantis wanted to build 300 residential units on the site. Now he wants a conditional use to build 442 units. As the residents have made clear during the previous debate over Atlantic Plaza, four-and five-story buildings adjacent to Veteran's Park and along Atlantic Avenue are not acceptable. There are no nearby buildings that big. The one project along East Atlantic Avenue that is that large – Barr Terrace – is widely viewed as a mistake. Whatever happens at Atlantic Plaza, the developer needs an adequate plan to deal with the increased traffic that will be dumped onto NE 7th Avenue into our neighborhood. The existing traffic is dangerous to pedestrians and bicyclists (including children who live in the neighborhood) along this residential street, and it will be even more dangerous if nothing is done to divert traffic onto the main thoroughfares. I urge you to not abandon the guidelines of our Downtown Master Plan, which say that we should preserve the character of our downtown by staying with two-and three-story structures along the Avenue. I realize Atlantic Plaza needs to be redeveloped. But we need to get this project right. And DeSantis' latest plan is not right for Delray. Thank you for all you do for Delray Beach! Best regards, Michelle Quigley 840 NE 1st Court 561-271-8466 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach’s most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach’s current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a “village-by-the-sea”. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach’s current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran’s Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately-owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process – The proposed plan has not been well-communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest redevelopment project in a generation. ________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Name Address ____________________________________________________________ _____________________ Contact Information Date 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Carolyn Patton <chempstead0853@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 5:31 PM To: wmmcduffie@mydelraybeach.com; Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; mprenaud@bellsouth.net; joannpeart@comcast.com; cor526@aol.com; annswank425 @yahoo.com Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Marina Historic Distrkct meeting on Atlantic Plaza II project Attachments: MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING.doc Commissioners and friends. Please join us for this critical discussion. We want to thank Bill Morris and his fellow developers for requesting to move the city commission meeting from Election Night to the following week. (6 p.m. Nov. 13). JoAnn, Cory and Mary: We would very much appreciate you forwarding this email to the members of the Lake Ida, Palm Trail and BPOA neighborhood organizations. Carolyn Patton chempstead0853@aol.com MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 6 PM, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 8TH NORTHERN TRUST BANK 770 E. ATLANTIC AVE. (UPSTAIRS IN LARGE MEETING ROOM) PRESENTATION ON THE ATLANTIC PLAZA II PROJECT IT IS THE LARGEST DEVELOPMENT IN DELRAY BEACH IN A LIFETIME SPEAKER: BILL MORRIS, ONE OF THE DEVELOPERS This is our opportunity to listen to the developer, ask important questions and express any concerns. The project still has to be voted on by the City Commission on Nov. 13th at City Hall, and that will be another chance for you to let your opinions be known (3 minute speaking time.) The developers are seeking variances on the height and residential density. Height would go from 48 feet to 60 feet and density would go from 197 units to 442. It is important to make developers and city officials aware of our position and opinions. Obviously, this development will affect us and our property values. Signed, Carolyn and Price Patton, Owners, 65 Palm Square and lot to the south 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Marie Nofsinger <marienofsinger@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 5:29 PM To: McDuffie, Woodie; Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; Nubin, Chevelle; cor526@aol.com; Helen Kelsey Subject: Atlantic Plaza Commission meeting VS National Presidential Election and more. 11 The presidential election and the city commission meeting regarding Atlantic Plaza happen to fall on the same date. I am sure this is an oversight and that you plan to reschedule the Atlantic Plaza meeting so that the residents of Delray Beach can join the rest of the country in the vote count and results. Atlantic Plaza As a 20 year resident of NE 7th Avenue and a 30 year resident of Delray Beach, I am shocked at the lack of the city's concern/interest in the surrounding neighborhoods. Imagine your own street filled with semi trucks of deliveries, construction vehicles and general visitor traffic being routed by your home at all hours as well as parking on a narrow street already too crowded. There will be no entrance from Federal highway into this plaza, only 1st St. , NE 7th Ave., and Atlantic Avenue. I cannot imagine the chaos this will create. If it were your street, wouldn't you want the city to help conserve your quality of life in your own neighborhood? There is a rendering of a "stop gate" that was shown at the Palm Trail Homeowners meeting last night that seems to make good sense for our community in order to avoid high traffic, rogue parking and the general nuisance of noise and pedestrians that will be accompanying this development. Bill Morris was in agreement for the street closure, but the city has to become involved for this to happen. I am an active voter in this city and have been for 30 years. What happens to my neighborhood of 20 years will have great impact on my vote at election time. TO INCREASE THE DENSITY for Atlantic Plaza would be the wrong thing to do. Wrong, wrong, wrong. What used to be a quaint village by the sea has fast become the exact opposite, and an increase in density for this plaza will pave the way for more developers to demand more, get more and destroy the very nucleus of what is left of any beauty and small town feel that attracted folks to Delray Beach. Progress is always inevitable and growth is important to sustain a small town/city. We had "great bones" to work with. Delray Beach had a quiet magic of its own. Knowing when to STOP is key to saving what's left. Not knowing when to stop will be quite evident as an abrupt, unruly end. 2 To be reckless and overbuild, over populate, create gridlock, tear down so many things that gave Delray Beach the magic, and to overlook the very residents who have supported this effort for 20 over years ( and more ) is what will be the end of the magic. City Place, Mizner Park, South Beach......high crime, gridlock, empty spaces, businesses leaving....this is what has to be prevented to save Delray Beach. Please let us block off NE 7th Avenue in order to keep the integrity of our neighborhood -to keep it from becoming just another throughway to Atlantic Plaza. Please reschedule the Atlatic Plaza city commission meeting for another night other than the Presidential Election. Please help save our neighborhood from becoming a nightmare. A resident of this city for 30 years, Marie Gardella 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Steve Plamann <steve_plamann@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 10:16 PM To: McDuffie, Woodie Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza Dear Mayor McDuffie, My name is Steve Plamann. My wife and I and our two sons live on N.E. First Court, one block away from Atlantic Plaza. We have lived in downtown Delray since 1987. I am writing to you express my deep concern over the new plans to redevelop Atlantic Plaza and the surrounding properties. I and my neighbors have a lot of experience over the last 10 years dealing with various plans for Atlantic Plaza. I know you do, too, since you were on the Commission during the last go-round. This latest proposal is the biggest and the worst we have seen yet. It is so huge that it is completely out of scale with the adjacent neighborhood and the rest of downtown. The buildings are too tall for this part of Delray and the density is too great. In 2005, residents packed City Hall to complain that the project was too dense when Carl DeSantis was trying to build 300 residential units on the site. Now he wants a conditional use to build 442 units. As the residents have made clear during the previous debate over Atlantic Plaza, four or fivefloor buildings adjacent to Veteran's Park and along the Avenue are not acceptable. There are no nearby buildings that big. And the one project along East Atlantic that is that large – Barr Terrace – is widely viewed as a mistake. Whatever happens at Atlantic Plaza, the developer needs an adequate plan to deal with the increased traffic that will be dumped onto NE 7th Ave into our neighborhood. There are lots of children and other pedestrians along this residential street and something needs to be done to divert traffic onto the main thoroughfares. I urge you to stick with the guidelines of our Downtown Master Plan, which say that we should preserve the character of our downtown by sticking to two and three story structures along the Avenue. I realize Atlantic Plaza needs to be redeveloped. But we need to get this project right. And DeSantis' latest plan is not right for Delray. 2 Thank you for all your great work for Delray Beach! Best regards, Steve Plamann 840 N.E. 1st Court 561-213-9566 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: ProfBea@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 5:43 PM To: McDuffie, Woodie; Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Fwd: Info From: ProfBea@aol.com To: carney@mydelraybeach.com, nubin@mydelraybeach.com Sent: 10/31/2012 5:27:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Fwd: Info From: ProfBea@aol.com To: nubin@delraybeach.com Sent: 10/31/2012 5:10:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Info City Clerk,Mayor Woodie McDuffie, As a member of the tax paying Delray Beach community, I would like to know why a meeting of such importance to our community is being scheduled on election night? The Atlantic Plaza 11 development group has ignored the city's limits for height and density and has overlooked our neighborhood's need for protection from huge amounts of traffic stemming from the increased number of proposed rental units. Election night should be for our focus on our nation, not a conflict with our own neighbors. I have been one of your supporters for a while. If this is the last thing you leave for Delray Beach as a legacy, shame on you. Please reconsider the time of this meeting. Thank You, Beatrice Ann Rizzo 50 East Rd, Apt 9F Delray Beach,Fl. 33483 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Torrey Everett <te3@bellsouth.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 4:56 PM To: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza Proposal My wife and I live at 50 East Road, Delray Beach. We are very much opposed to the current proposal to redevelop Atlantic Plaza. This issue has been discussed several times before and a deal was struck that was, if not ideal, at least was acceptable to the residents in the area. Now, the developer is coming back for another bite at the apple ‐‐higher density, rental instead of owned apartments, more bulk in the buildings. Traffic is still an issue. As you know, this site is adjacent to the Atlantic Avenue bridge, which during the season opens twice an hour pretty much all day long. With the entrance redrawn to Atlantic Avenue, instead of Federal Highway, this will be a nightmare. There is a provision for entrance off of First Street, but it would be hidden from passersby on Federal. The notion of shared parking, that the residents will be out at work, thereby freeing up parking for the commercial tenants is foolish. What about in the evenings and weekends? What about people who work at home or in the commercial space within the development. Their spaces are not freed up. Putting parking below ground does help reduce the bulk of the buildings, but there is a reason why virtually no homes in Florida have basements ‐‐a high water table. Can the developer point at a single development in coastal Florida where below ground parking has worked? The property is adjacent to one of the most used parks in the City, Veterans Park, and the proposed bulk of the buildings will have a damaging influence on the atmosphere and activities in the park. Finally, I am very disappointed in the Commission's decision to discuss the biggest project in recent Delray history on the night of the national elections, a time when many people will want to stay home to follow the election results. Being charitable, I ascribe this to foolishness on the Commission's part, rather than an intentional effort to discourage community participation in the process. We hope you will tell the developer that this issue has already been resolved and stop bringing it back. Torrey & Carole Everett 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: sheah@fuse.net Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 5:43 PM To: Carney, Tom; Jacquet, Al; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; wmcdufffie@mydelraybeach.com Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza II A call for votes at 11:15 pm by the PZB on 10/15, a Commission Meeting scheduled for Election Night on an issue of this magnitude -I would say it looks like the deck has been stacked!! I am a new permanent voting resident of downtown Delray Beach.and will do everything legal to prevent this project from going forward with the proposed density. I urge you to take the time to ensure Delray's future. Sheila Sreden 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: N Ramachandran <nkrama1@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:28 PM To: Carney, Tom; frankle@mydelraybeach.com; Gray, Angeleta; jacqet@mydelraybeach.com; McDuffie, Woodie Cc: Nubin, Chevelle; ebetta@comcast.net Subject: Atlantic Plaza 11 Re Development Plan I am a resident in the city of Delray on the east side of the inter coastal.I was involved like most residents in the city, during the many town hall meetings and the city hall meetings for the last proposal 3+ years ago.It took us all most a year to get that the way the community would like to see it built including the height and the depth. Before anything was approved study was done to see the traffic pattern on Atlantic avenue with the bridge so close to the plaza.That was so crucial in deciding the height and the depth. Also that was presented during the season when all the residents were here and most of us took part in these meetings.Another important factor was how veterans park will look with these project. so they let us incorporate veterans Parke modification to blend in and also very much visible and accessible to the public.We took pride in this and helped and worked with the developers. This project on the other hand was presented in August when majority of the residents are still out of town and was passed by the council 11.30PM when most of the people have left.On top of that the next meeting is set for the 6Th of November on election day.In the history of this city I do not believe there ever was a meeting set on election day.This such a mammoth project so important to us all, and you, our representatives treating this like a little some thing with no significant impact to our beautiful city. The traffic impact, the proximity to the inter costal bridge none of this is taken into consideration in your process.How could you do this.We trusted you to lead the proper way like the previous plan instead you abandoned us. It will be very hard to trust you all to do the wright thing in the future.You have a lot to answer .Why you started in August? Why this project which was the most impotent subject put as last to discuss in all your meetings and vote for it 11.30PM when most people have left ? On top of that you scheduled a meeting of this importance on election night.This not only smells fishy it taste very fishy. Please cancel the 6Th meeting and reschedule for another day.We would appreciate your cooperation and also like to see this on top of your list instead at the end. Thanking you, Sincerely, Nalini Ramachandran. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: kanemanor <kanemanor@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:25 PM To: Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; McDuffie, Woodie Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza II development I live at 50 East Road, and I strongly disagree with the proposal of the developers of the Atlantic Plaza. Besides the increase of traffic which is already overwhelming on Atlantic Avenue, this proposal lowers the standards of our great town to mediocrity by increasing the density and height beyond measure from what has been allowed. Four years ago you turned down a similar plan which I hope you will again hold tight to what makes our community unique and beautiful -a village that is limited in tall buildings and tight spaces. I think people settle in Delray Beach because it is a community with open spaces, low density and small town feeling. Please let's not be another Fort Lauderdale or Deerfield or Pompano Beach. Pat Humphrey 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Joan Mitrani <joanmitrani@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:47 PM To: Jacquet, Al; McDuffie, Woodie; Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza ll I am a Delray Beach resident residing at Barr Terrace. I would like to know why an important meeting regarding the city's own limits on height and density is scheduled to be held on election night. I would also like to know why the city commission should ignore the city's own limits for Atlantic Plaza ll. I also wish to express my concern about the number of rental units that are being proposed. Additionally, the need for protection from overflow traffic must be addressed. I will expect to hear from you concerning how you will handle these issues. Yours truly, Joan Mitrani@gmail.com 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Andre Stevens <andre.stevensmj@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 4:12 PM To: Nubin, Chevelle Cc: carney@mydelraybeach.com frankel@mydelraybeach.com agray@mydelraybeach.com jacquet@mydelraybeach.com wmcduffie@mydelraybeach.com Subject: Atlantic Plaza !! I want to express my concern why a meeting of such importance is being held on election night? Our neighborhood's need for protection from overflow traffic from the plaza. Also concern about the number of rental units that are being proposed. Sincerely Yours. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: John Papaloizos <john@greek123.com> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:32 AM To: Gray, Angeleta Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: November 6th Metting-Atlantic Plaza II Dear Commissioner Gray, I am contacting you to express my concern about the project and process for the Atlantic Plaza II redevelopment project. As a long term resident I have many questions about the impact of the density exception that was granted by the planning and zoning board that are left unanswered. I don’t believe the project has been given the scrutiny it deserves and cannot understand why previous approvals should be revised. Most problematic is the way in which the process has unfolded. Brought up in August and voted on at an 11:15 meeting when everyone had left through attrition. Its hard to believe that the next meeting is scheduled for election night when everyone wants to be home watching the news. Is there a way to postpone the meeting? In short I have a serious process in general and feel completely disenfranchised. I know your schedule must keep you extremely busy but could you take the time to email or call me with a reply? Thank you and I look forward to your response, John Papaloizos 561‐860‐6093 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: SUSAN RIMAUD-RESNICK <rimaud.susanres@wanadoo.fr> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 10:40 AM To: Carney, Tom Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza II : keep on listening! Dear Sir, Please use your authority to continue the discussion between Delray residents and the Delray government concerning the Atlantic Plaza 11 proposal. The subject is critical to our lives in Delray and and the late night vote at the Planning and Zoning meeting should not be thought of as definitive. The Commission meeting should be resheduled to a date other than election day to permit full discussion of the project. Sincerely, Susan Resnick Barr Terrace Condo Owner 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Gill Bentley <kayakleland@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 5:54 PM To: Gray, Angeleta Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Hold the line for Delray-Atlantic II Project. DEAR COMMISSIONER GRAY: We could't believe this project is again proposed. It is even more dense and higher than the last time and the last time it was vehemently opposed by the neighborhood. . Commissioner Gray, when will the City hold the line on ITS OWN CITY ORDINANCES for height and density ? Yet another variance is a lousy precedent . The project of this size will surely cast shade and dwarf both park and its surroundings . Alas, when the bridge is up, the winter traffic congestion is awful NOW! Cars are unable to cross or turn on to Atlantic Ave. as it is now. It will certainly lessen the attractiveness of the area to us. WE HOPE YOU WILL GIVE THIS MATTER AND OUR OPINION AS AREA RESIDENTS YOUR DEEP CONSIDERATION, THANK YOU. SINCERELY, THOMAS AND GILL BENTLEY CC City Clerk of Delray 50 East Road, 3G, Delray Beach, FL 33483 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Gill Bentley <kayakleland@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 6:05 PM To: Jacquet, Al Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic II Plaza-even bigger! DEAR COMMISSIONER JACQUET: As old time winter residents in the Barr Terrace & taxpayers , we couldn't believe this project was up again for consideration and in even greater violation of Delray Zoning Ordinances on density and height . The neighborhood vehemently opposed the project then and we know many still very much do today. It will dwarf the surrounding area, put the Veterans Park in the shade and create even more congestion to that area than there is now.-especially when the bridge is up.. SHAME! IT IS TIME TO HOLD THE LINE FOR DELRAY, COMMISSIONER. Thank you for giving this your deep consideration. Thomas and Gill Bentley 50 East Road, 3G, Delray Beach, Fl 33483 cc City Clerk of Delray 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Gill Bentley <kayakleland@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 6:20 PM To: McDuffie, Woodie Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: NO ON ATLANTIC II PLAZA DEAR MAYOR: As residents of Delray and the Barr Terrace opposite the proposed project, we were shocked to see the project even taller and more dense than the last time it was proposed. It seems to us that your legacy and hard work as Mayor should not be remembered as the Mayor who supported this behemoth in direct violation of long standing carefully drawn up Zoning Ordinances restricting height and density. Just think about the congestion in winter when the bridge is up. It is a mess now. TIME TO STAND FIRM, MAYOR, SINCERELY, THOMAS AND GILL BENTLEY 50 East Road, Apt. 3G, Delray Beach, FL 33483 CC City Clerk of Delray 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Gill Bentley <kayakleland@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 5:14 PM To: Carney, Tom Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic II Plaza-what still more? DEAR VICE-MAYOR CARNEY: As longtime winter residents of Delray and the Barr Terrace directly opposite the ATlantic II Plaza Proposal , we continue to oppose this evergrowing project. My , how the units, density and height sure grew even since the last time this was proposed! . The prospect of winter, the bridge up and even more congestion in the area of Atlantic Avenue is gross. It is a frequent mess now. What happened to Delray zoning law on residential unit of some 30 untis per acre? Years ago Delray carefully passed a height limitation-and , compared to Boca and other cities, it is absolutely part of its beauty, allowing light and view to the surroundings . Will the City grant yet another variance ..again? What a precedent! What a mockery of basic city planning that will surely dwarf Veterans Park, the surrounding area and destroy the ambience of an already congested area. DEAR VICE-MAYOR, IT IS TIME TO HOLD THE LINE FOR DELRAY. SINCERELY, TOM AND GILL BENTLEY CC CITY CLERK OF DELRAY Thomas & Gill l Bentley 50 East Road Apt. 3G Delray Beach, FL 33483 561 278 4776 kayakleland@gmail.com 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Carolyn Patton <chempstead0853@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 5:31 PM To: wmmcduffie@mydelraybeach.com; Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; mprenaud@bellsouth.net; joannpeart@comcast.com; cor526@aol.com; annswank425 @yahoo.com Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Marina Historic Distrkct meeting on Atlantic Plaza II project Attachments: MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING.doc Commissioners and friends. Please join us for this critical discussion. We want to thank Bill Morris and his fellow developers for requesting to move the city commission meeting from Election Night to the following week. (6 p.m. Nov. 13). JoAnn, Cory and Mary: We would very much appreciate you forwarding this email to the members of the Lake Ida, Palm Trail and BPOA neighborhood organizations. Carolyn Patton chempstead0853@aol.com 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Dorothy Chiesa <dorothy.chiesa1@earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:32 AM To: Carney, Tom Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza We need people to support our shops and restaurants. We do not need more residents -we need visitors -a steady and continuing stream of them Visitors need PARKING not Housing. I hear complaints from people who don't want to come cause its too hard to park. And dont mention Valets -a car is a car and it needs a space no matter who parks it. Terrific events are planned and people can't PARK. If its too hard to park they won't come Do not approve the revised plan for Atlantic Plaza -242 new apartments proposed with 30 new Parking places is so insulting -I can only think they must have been getting blow jobs when they approved. Got your attention? This is not just about Atlantic Plaza -its about our lovely village by the sea. Thats why people love to come to us. Dont strangle it with traffic -and not enough parking -thats the death toll for any town. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Dorothy Chiesa <dorothy.chiesa1@earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:50 AM To: Frankel, Adam Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza We need to support our shope and Restaurants. Part of that is new residents and there is so much new housing springing up just on Federal along We do not need more residents -we need VISITORS -a steady and continuing stream of the VISITORS need PARKING. not Housing. I hear complaints all the time not from people who don't want to come here because its too hard to park. And dont mention Valets -a car is car and needs a space regardless who parks it. Terrific Events are planned & people will think twice about attenting if its too difficult to PARK. Do not approve the revised plan for Atlantic Plaza. 242 new apts planned and only 30 PARKING. Thats so insulting I can only think the supportors must have been getting blow jobs at the time. What else could account for such stupidity? Got your attention? This is not just about Atlantic Plaza -its about our lovely village by the sea. Thats whats make people come to visit. Dont strangle it with more traffic and not enough parking. Thats the death toll of any town. Do not approve any additional units for Atlantic Plaza. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Chris Davey <cmdavey@aol.com> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:57 AM To: Carney, Tom Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Dear Vice-Mayor Carney, I am writing to state my opposition to the revised proposal for Atlantic Plaza II. I have been a resident of "Downtown" Delray Beach for 5+ years and moved here because of the "Village By The Sea" charm that is so different than all the other South Florida communities. As an interested resident, and a person who has worked in the real estate field for the past 18 years, I oppose the revised plan for the following reasons: 1. The expansion to 50+ residential units/acre is far, far too high. I live in Mallory Square where the residential density is approximately 22 units/acre. The density of The Meridian (across the street and on Federal Highway northbound just 3 blocks south of Atlantic Avenue) is 30 units/acre. The density of 30 residential units/acre, PLUS office space, PLUS retail space, PLUS restaurant space is MORE than adequate for this site. 2. The developer's plan to have 312 residential and workforce rental units, plus 130 condominium units, is not in the best interest of the City. Homeowners are in the best interest of the City and undoubtedly make for a more stable resident base than do transient renters. As a real estate professional, I am sure that gaining approval for the rental units, and the higher density, makes it much easier for the developers to finance the project. However, the City and it's residents should not be bending over backwards to cut a deal that is in the developer's interest and not in the City's. If the developers can't finance and build the project as condominiums, and as approved, let them sell it to someone who will. Believe me, there will be people willing to take over the project, but the price they are willing to pay may not be what the developers want. However, that is hardly the problem of the City, or its residents. 3. There is nowhere near enough parking provided for a residential/office/retail/restaur ant complex of this size. Having been involved in the approval and design of large commercial and mixed use projects in the past, let me say that the whole idea of "transitional" parking is a theory without merit. The parking assumptions are just that, assumptions. Hard data, and proven calculations would state that much, much more parking is necessary for a complex of this size and mix. It seems to me that the developer came up with a plan to build and then employed a "theory" and "low-balled" numbers to justify the amount of parking that could be provided at the site. What I find unbelievable is that the City Planners seem to agree with the developers as if the parking "plan" is based upon proven historical data and facts instead of "theory". We do not need the most important and valuable piece of real estate developed in the City, in a generation (at least), built based upon a parking "theory". This project needs adequate parking and the last thing we need in Downtown Delray is more valet parking to make up for inadequate and improper planning. 4. Allowing underground parking so close to a tidal body of water is another "theory". The parking that is below grade will probably be unusable at some point in the future. It is my understanding that the developers have not been able to give ANY examples of parking being constructed as planned, in South Florida, so close to a tidal body of water. Personally, I would not want just one example, I think there should be many, as we want something that is proven, not another theory. I understand why the developers want this parking below grade as it is the only way to fit even the inadequate amount of parking they plan to provide on the site. Moving the parking to grade level would require either a taller structure, or a larger footprint. Eliminating the parking below grade would require a reduction in some aspect of the plan, be it residential units, office space, retail space, or restaurant space. The below grade parking is just another example of skewed calculations and theories being used in order to justify an outcome. If building parking below grade is so easy and a good idea, why didn't the City do it when they built their parking garages on NE 2nd Ave. and SE 1st Ave.? Those structures were not less than 150 feet from the intracoastal waterway, like the one the developers plan on building. 5. City residents were not informed or brought into the process about these radical changes to an already approved plan. The plan that has currently been approved was reviewed and approved with public input and a significant amount of review by the City several years ago. To rush through extensive changes is the opposite of what the citizens want. In my opinion, the Planning and Zoning Board behaved in a disgraceful manner by approving this plan while having so many unanswered questions. The fact that the plan was voted on at almost midnight when most residents had left the meeting 2 is certainly a "black eye" for that Board. It seemed like a majority of the Board had many questions but were "kicking the can down the road" by saying that these issues could be addressed later, by the City Commission. Isn't it the job of the Planning and Zoning Board to get the answers and require changes BEFORE they approve something rather than approving it and saying issues like parking, height, traffic, etc. can be addressed later? City government is supposed to act on behalf of the citizens and in the best interests of the community and the citizens. So far, the actions of some of our appointed officials (employees of the city and the appointed members of the Planning and Zoning Board) do not meet that threshold. Hopefully our elected officials will do better. Please rest assured that I will attend the City Commission meeting on this matter. I hope I can count on your vote to oppose this revised plan. I have voted in every election for the past 29 years and do not believe I have missed one partisan or non-partisan election. Most of the time I abhor people who are "one issue" voters. However, on this issue I will certainly be a one issue voter. If you oppose this plan I will certainly be grateful. However, if you support this plan you can certainly count on my opposition to your future candidacy no matter what office you decide to seek in the future. Thank you, in advance, for you consideration of my views, Christopher Davey 319 E. Mallory Circle Delray Beach, FL 33483 Tel: 561-865-5186 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Chris Davey <cmdavey@aol.com> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:00 PM To: Frankel, Adam Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Dear Deputy Vice-Mayor Frankel, I am writing to state my opposition to the revised proposal for Atlantic Plaza II. I have been a resident of "Downtown" Delray Beach for 5+ years and moved here because of the "Village By The Sea" charm that is so different than all the other South Florida communities. As an interested resident, and a person who has worked in the real estate field for the past 18 years, I oppose the revised plan for the following reasons: 1. The expansion to 50+ residential units/acre is far, far too high. I live in Mallory Square where the residential density is approximately 22 units/acre. The density of The Meridian (across the street and on Federal Highway northbound just 3 blocks south of Atlantic Avenue) is 30 units/acre. The density of 30 residential units/acre, PLUS office space, PLUS retail space, PLUS restaurant space is MORE than adequate for this site. 2. The developer's plan to have 312 residential and workforce rental units, plus 130 condominium units, is not in the best interest of the City. Homeowners are in the best interest of the City and undoubtedly make for a more stable resident base than do transient renters. As a real estate professional, I am sure that gaining approval for the rental units, and the higher density, makes it much easier for the developers to finance the project. However, the City and it's residents should not be bending over backwards to cut a deal that is in the developer's interest and not in the City's. If the developers can't finance and build the project as condominiums, and as approved, let them sell it to someone who will. Believe me, there will be people willing to take over the project, but the price they are willing to pay may not be what the developers want. However, that is hardly the problem of the City, or its residents. 3. There is nowhere near enough parking provided for a residential/office/retail/restaurant complex of this size. Having been involved in the approval and design of large commercial and mixed use projects in the past, let me say that the whole idea of "transitional" parking is a theory without merit. The parking assumptions are just that, assumptions. Hard data, and proven calculations would state that much, much more parking is necessary for a complex of this size and mix. It seems to me that the developer came up with a plan to build and then employed a "theory" and "low-balled" numbers to justify the amount of parking that could be provided at the site. What I find unbelievable is that the City Planners seem to agree with the developers as if the parking "plan" is based upon proven historical data and facts instead of "theory". We do not need the most important and valuable piece of real estate developed in the City, in a generation (at least), built based upon a parking "theory". This project needs adequate parking and the last thing we need in Downtown Delray is more valet parking to make up for inadequate and improper planning. 4. Allowing underground parking so close to a tidal body of water is another "theory". The parking that is below grade will probably be unusable at some point in the future. It is my understanding that the developers have not been able to give ANY examples of parking being constructed as planned, in South Florida, so close to a tidal body of water. Personally, I would not want just one example, I think there should be many, as we want something that is proven, not another theory. I understand why the developers want this parking below grade as it is the only way to fit even the inadequate amount of parking they plan to provide on the site. Moving the parking to grade level would require either a taller structure, or a larger footprint. Eliminating the parking below grade would require a reduction in some aspect of the plan, be it residential units, office space, retail space, or restaurant space. The below grade parking is just another example of skewed calculations and theories being used in order to justify an outcome. If building parking below grade is so easy and a good idea, why didn't the City do it when they built their parking garages on NE 2nd Ave. and SE 1st Ave.? Those structures were not less than 150 feet from the intracoastal waterway, like the one the developers plan on building. 5. City residents were not informed or brought into the process about these radical changes to an already approved plan. The plan that has currently been approved was reviewed and approved with public input and a significant amount of review by the City several years ago. To rush through extensive changes is the opposite of what the citizens want. In my opinion, the Planning and Zoning Board behaved in a disgraceful manner by approving this plan while having so many unanswered questions. The fact that the plan was voted on at almost midnight when most residents had left the meeting 2 is certainly a "black eye" for that Board. It seemed like a majority of the Board had many questions but were "kicking the can down the road" by saying that these issues could be addressed later, by the City Commission. Isn't it the job of the Planning and Zoning Board to get the answers and require changes BEFORE they approve something rather than approving it and saying issues like parking, height, traffic, etc. can be addressed later? City government is supposed to act on behalf of the citizens and in the best interests of the community and the citizens. So far, the actions of some of our appointed officials (employees of the city and the appointed members of the Planning and Zoning Board) do not meet that threshold. Hopefully our elected officials will do better. Please rest assured that I will attend the City Commission meeting on this matter. I hope I can count on your vote to oppose this revised plan. I have voted in every election for the past 29 years and do not believe I have missed one partisan or non-partisan election. Most of the time I abhor people who are "one issue" voters. However, on this issue I will certainly be a one issue voter. If you oppose this plan I will certainly be grateful. However, if you support this plan you can certainly count on my opposition to your future candidacy no matter what office you decide to seek in the future. Thank you, in advance, for you consideration of my views, Christopher Davey 319 E. Mallory Circle Delray Beach, FL 33483 Tel: 561-865-5186 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Arlen D. Dominek <adominek@bellsouth.net> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:54 PM To: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: FW: Atlantic Plaza II Unfortunately, I believe that I did not have the correct email address for you and am accordingly retransmitting it. From: Arlen D. Dominek [mailto:adominek@bellsouth.net] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 19:09 To: 'carney@mydelraybeach.com'; 'frankel@mydelraybeach.com'; 'agray@mydelraybeach.com'; 'jacquet@mydelraybeach.com'; 'wmcduffie@mydelraybeach.com' Cc: 'nubbin@mydelraybeach.com' Subject: Atlantic Plaza II To the City Commission: You have been asked to give consideration to a new – and quite controversial ‐conditional use request for increased density for Atlantic Plaza. A similar density request was not granted at the inception of this project a number of years ago and should not be granted now for the same reasons that it was not granted originally. Given that this project sits at one of the major gateways to one of our great treasures, the beach front, I would urge you to carefully review this project and to allow for your consideration of other factors as well as for input by your constituents before making any final decision. I would also ask that you defer the first reading of this request scheduled for your meeting on November 06, the evening of Election Day, when so many of your constituents and undoubtedly yourselves will be focused on the election itself. I would also request that it be scheduled such that sufficient time is allotted for consideration without having the number of attendees dwindling because of the late hour as well as for your own convenience and endurance. There is no question that this property should be enhanced to contribute to the overall desirability of living, working, and shopping in Delray Beach. Delray Beach has changed for the better since my first visit some 25 years ago and since the time that I started working and living here in 1998. However, there are a number of very serious concerns and issues regarding this project, not the least of which are the financial feasibility of the project, the feasibility of creating parking below sea level, and the fact that any additional revenues will not go into City’s own coffers. The proposed density is too great ‐particularly in the context of the transient (rental) population now that funding is oriented towards rental, rather than owner‐occupied, property. Such density combined with the transient population potentially adversely affects the nature of our community. Traffic and parking issues have not been sufficiently analyzed and mitigated. We already have a gridlock along the length of Atlantic Avenue from east of the bridge to Swinton, particularly when the bridge is open. Traffic will be increased within neighboring residential areas. Moreover, the assumptions for parking needs predicated upon mixed use are not well founded. 2  You cannot assume that the spaces per unit are sufficient or that residents will not be home during the day.  With increased prosperity comes more cars per unit, not to mention that many of these luxury apartments may be shared by roommates, thereby further increasing the number of cars per unit.  More people work at home, meaning that their cars will not be gone during the day.  Plus, the increased number of workers who travel via plane and get to the airport by car service suggests that their cars, too, will be parked at home during the day.  Our increased percentage of snowbirds also suggests that there will be more resident cars parked during the day. It is not clear how Veterans Park will be integrated into this project. The residents and visitors to Delray use this park, for art shows, relaxation, and concerts. Some of us vote there. Our children and our grandchildren play there. Consideration of this should not be deferred until it is too late. No green‐use requirements have been imposed for this project. Given the state of the American debt resulting from oil imports as well as the potentially unfunded additional burden upon our infrastructure, should these not be considerations in a project that will shape the nature of Delray Beach for many years? Even though it’s often difficult to measure or quantify the attributes of appearance, desirability, and ambiance, they are important to the gestalt and viability of a community. We all know what comprises a nice place to visit, to vacation in, to shop in, and to live in. We sense it; we know it; we feel it. Let’s make sure that this project makes us feel that way. But, we don’t have any idea of what this project will look like or how it will fee. The developer has not provided charrettes for our view, adequately addressed parking and traffic issues, clearly identified what kind of retail presence will be established (which is hard to do when rental rates haven’t been established), or spent time winning over the residents of Delray ‐your constituents. Let’s get this mixture of retail, office, and residential space right so that we can enjoy it for many generations. Finally, let’s please also consider improving our entire process of planning and zoning and the granting of conditional use so that it makes sense, so that it provides for public input, so that it supports sustainability, so that it’s transparent, and so that we, the citizens of Delray Beach, do not feel that something is being railroaded down our throats as we have with meetings scheduled when many people are gone and voting occurring close to midnight. The developer has had much time to develop a comprehensive plan acceptable to the City and its citizens over the course of the past few years and has failed to do so. We should take the time to get this right. I would hate to think that we will end up with something similar to those projects that you can see on busy roads in other parts of South Florida that have failed to be integrated into the fiber of the community. Respectfully submitted, Arlen D. Dominek 50 East Road, 2G Delray Beach, Florida 33483 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: louiloui1 <louiloui1@bellsouth.net> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 2:23 PM To: Nubin, Chevelle; Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; McDuffie, Woodie; louiloui1@bellsouth.net Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Dear Sirs and Madams: My name is Mary Lou McAllister, and I live at Bar Terrace, 50 East Road, Apt. 1B. My concern is what is going to happen across the Intracoastal Waterway by the Atlantic Plaza II development. I do not understand why the City ignores its own limits on height and density. I also do not understand why the Commissioners have decided to call a meeting of this importance on Election Night. This issue and its ramifications on our neighborhood are far too important not to provide a meeting date that will encourage full participation from the neighborhood. Mary Lou McAllister 410.310.4765 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Adrienne Kaye <adrienneck@me.com> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 8:28 AM To: Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam Cc: Gray, Angeleta; jacquet@mydelraybeacj.com; McDuffie, Woodie; Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Concerned residents..Atlantic plaza We are residents of delray beach and are writing to you to express our concern about the proposed Atlantic Plaza project. Firstly, We are voicing opposition to this meeting being held on election night. This is too important an issue to be on a night when many people will be busy with election results. Secondly, our neighborhood has to be protected from the traffic nightmare that this proposed project will create. It is already nearly impossible to navigate Atlantic avenue , even off season. Imagine the snarls and inability to handle this traffic in season! Finally, the number of rental units being proposed exceeds the original plan and will create and add to existing traffic situations in east delray. Many people out of the area already express concern about dining and shopping in delray beach because of the crowds and traffic that already exist. This project will only turn this charming town into a place that will become unappealable to many looking to visit and live here. Thank you. We hope you take this issue seriously and put it on the agenda on a night that the town can really express its concern. Thank you Adrienne and Alan kaye 50 east road 265-0095 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Dorothy Chiesa <dorothy.chiesa1@earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:00 PM To: Gray, Angeleta Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza We need to support our shops and restaurants and some new housing which is already spring up all along Federal can help. But thats enough. We dont need more new residents -we need VISITORS -a steady and continuing stream of them. And VISITORS dont require housing. They need PARKING -I hear complaints all the time from people who come less and less now that its become harder and harder to park. And dont mention Valets. A car needs a space regardless who parks it. Terrific Events are Planned to attract people -but where will you put them? They wontt come if they are annoyed by lack of parking. Do not approve the Atlantic Plaza revised plan. More than 200 units and only 30 parking spaces-how could anyone approve something so insulting. This is not just about Atalntic Plaza -and the developers will sell you anything they can in their own interest. Its your job to see to it that the best interest of our village by the sea is being served. Thats what attracts people to us. Donts strangle it with traffic and not enough parking to boot. Thats the death toll for any town. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Chris Davey <cmdavey@aol.com> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:01 PM To: Gray, Angeleta Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Dear Commissioner Gray, I am writing to state my opposition to the revised proposal for Atlantic Plaza II. I have been a resident of "Downtown" Delray Beach for 5+ years and moved here because of the "Village By The Sea" charm that is so different than all the other South Florida communities. As an interested resident, and a person who has worked in the real estate field for the past 18 years, I oppose the revised plan for the following reasons: 1. The expansion to 50+ residential units/acre is far, far too high. I live in Mallory Square where the residential density is approximately 22 units/acre. The density of The Meridian (across the street and on Federal Highway northbound just 3 blocks south of Atlantic Avenue) is 30 units/acre. The density of 30 residential units/acre, PLUS office space, PLUS retail space, PLUS restaurant space is MORE than adequate for this site. 2. The developer's plan to have 312 residential and workforce rental units, plus 130 condominium units, is not in the best interest of the City. Homeowners are in the best interest of the City and undoubtedly make for a more stable resident base than do transient renters. As a real estate professional, I am sure that gaining approval for the rental units, and the higher density, makes it much easier for the developers to finance the project. However, the City and it's residents should not be bending over backwards to cut a deal that is in the developer's interest and not in the City's. If the developers can't finance and build the project as condominiums, and as approved, let them sell it to someone who will. Believe me, there will be people willing to take over the project, but the price they are willing to pay may not be what the developers want. However, that is hardly the problem of the City, or its residents. 3. There is nowhere near enough parking provided for a residential/office/retail/restaur ant complex of this size. Having been involved in the approval and design of large commercial and mixed use projects in the past, let me say that the whole idea of "transitional" parking is a theory without merit. The parking assumptions are just that, assumptions. Hard data, and proven calculations would state that much, much more parking is necessary for a complex of this size and mix. It seems to me that the developer came up with a plan to build and then employed a "theory" and "low-balled" numbers to justify the amount of parking that could be provided at the site. What I find unbelievable is that the City Planners seem to agree with the developers as if the parking "plan" is based upon proven historical data and facts instead of "theory". We do not need the most important and valuable piece of real estate developed in the City, in a generation (at least), built based upon a parking "theory". This project needs adequate parking and the last thing we need in Downtown Delray is more valet parking to make up for inadequate and improper planning. 4. Allowing underground parking so close to a tidal body of water is another "theory". The parking that is below grade will probably be unusable at some point in the future. It is my understanding that the developers have not been able to give ANY examples of parking being constructed as planned, in South Florida, so close to a tidal body of water. Personally, I would not want just one example, I think there should be many, as we want something that is proven, not another theory. I understand why the developers want this parking below grade as it is the only way to fit even the inadequate amount of parking they plan to provide on the site. Moving the parking to grade level would require either a taller structure, or a larger footprint. Eliminating the parking below grade would require a reduction in some aspect of the plan, be it residential units, office space, retail space, or restaurant space. The below grade parking is just another example of skewed calculations and theories being used in order to justify an outcome. If building parking below grade is so easy and a good idea, why didn't the City do it when they built their parking garages on NE 2nd Ave. and SE 1st Ave.? Those structures were not less than 150 feet from the intracoastal waterway, like the one the developers plan on building. 5. City residents were not informed or brought into the process about these radical changes to an already approved plan. The plan that has currently been approved was reviewed and approved with public input and a significant amount of review by the City several years ago. To rush through extensive changes is the opposite of what the citizens want. In my opinion, the Planning and Zoning Board behaved in a disgraceful manner by approving this plan while having so many 2 unanswered questions. The fact that the plan was voted on at almost midnight when most residents had left the meeting is certainly a "black eye" for that Board. It seemed like a majority of the Board had many questions but were "kicking the can down the road" by saying that these issues could be addressed later, by the City Commission. Isn't it the job of the Planning and Zoning Board to get the answers and require changes BEFORE they approve something rather than approving it and saying issues like parking, height, traffic, etc. can be addressed later? City government is supposed to act on behalf of the citizens and in the best interests of the community and the citizens. So far, the actions of some of our appointed officials (employees of the city and the appointed members of the Planning and Zoning Board) do not meet that threshold. Hopefully our elected officials will do better. Please rest assured that I will attend the City Commission meeting on this matter. I hope I can count on your vote to oppose this revised plan. I have voted in every election for the past 29 years and do not believe I have missed one partisan or non-partisan election. Most of the time I abhor people who are "one issue" voters. However, on this issue I will certainly be a one issue voter. If you oppose this plan I will certainly be grateful. However, if you support this plan you can certainly count on my opposition to your future candidacy no matter what office you decide to seek in the future. Thank you, in advance, for you consideration of my views, Christopher Davey 319 E. Mallory Circle Delray Beach, FL 33483 Tel: 561-865-5186 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Dorothy Chiesa <dorothy.chiesa1@earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:10 PM To: Jacquet, Al Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza We need to support our shops and restaurants -and some additional housing will help -but thats already going on up and down Federal -We do not need new residents -we need VISITORS -a steady and continuing stream of them year after year after year! VISITORS need PARKING not housing. I hear complaints from people who are coming less and less as parking has b ecome harder and harder. We can't affoard to lose VISITORS You plan terrific Events to attract them and then no place to put them when they come. And dont mention Valet. A car needs a space no matter who parks it. Do not approve the recvised plan for Atlantic Plaza. 242 new units with 30 new parking spaces? What were they smoking when them approved? This is not just about Atlantic Placa. Its about our beautiful village by the sea. Thats why people love to visit us. Dont strantgle it with traffic and not enough parking to boot. Thats the death toll for any town. The developers have their own interest at heart and our lovely village by the sea is not one of them -except as it serves their wants (greed) . Its not your job to cater to them -Its your job to protect the best interests for now and the future of Delray Beach. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Dorothy Chiesa <dorothy.chiesa1@earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:20 PM To: wmcduffie@myfelraybeach.com Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: atlantic plaza We need to support our shops and Restaurants and some new housing can help -but there is already enough of tha happening just up and down Federal. We do not need still more new residents -we need VISITORS -a continuing and steady stream of them year after year after year. VISITORS dont require housing -they require PARKING. I more frequently hear now from people who come less and less as parking becomes harder and harder. Dont mention Valets. A car needs a space regardless of who parks it. And the new golf carts?? ~Cute. But certainly not going to releive any significant volume. Terrific events are planned to attract people -but if they're annoyed by lack of parking?? How long will it be before they just stop coming. Dont approve the Atlantic Plaza revised plan. 242 new units and 30 parking. What were they smoking when they approved? This is not just about Atlantic Plaza -its about our beautiful village by the sea. Thats why they come. If you spoil our character by strangling us in traffic with no parking to boot.-why would they bother. Thats the death toll for any town. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Nubin, Chevelle Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 4:45 PM To: Wynn, Kimberly Subject: FW: Atlantic Plaza II FYI. Chevelle D. Nubin, MMC City Clerk City of Delray Beach FACC Southeast District Director 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 561-243-7051 From: ebetta@comcast.net [mailto:ebetta@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:56 AM To: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Fwd: Atlantic Plaza II I misspoke. It's the corner of Atlantic and Federal Highway North. From: ebetta@comcast.net To: frankel@mydelraybeach.com Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2012 9:42:32 AM Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Dear Mr. Frankel, My name is Emma Betta. I am President of the Board of Barr Terrace Condominiums, located at East Road and Atlantic Avenue. I am a permanent resident of Delray Beach, and I vote in Delray Beach. As so many of my neighbors already have, I am voicing my opposition to granting a variance to the developers of Atlantic Plaza II. My reasons for such objection lie in the issues of increased density and compatibility. Increasing the number of residential units from 30 per acre, to 50 or so per acre can only cause even more severe traffic congestion. As it is, even out of season, there are times when getting down Atlantic avenue in a reasonable amount of time is virtually impossible. In season, we can wait for as many as 10 minutes to make a turn into our building's driveway. People already take alternative routes to get where they need to go, avoiding Atlantic Avenue. As a resident nearby, you must be aware of the backup that the opening of the bridge on Atlantic Avenue causes as it is now. The amount of additional traffic, caused by severely increased density, will only exacerbate an existing problem. Please understand that I am not opposed to development. The corner of Atlantic and Federal Highway South needs development. I think that your plans for a new tennis center are excellent, although I can't imagine the problems that the proposed variance for Atlantic Plaza II and the ensuing 2 gridlock could cause, in terms of access to that center from the east. I am simply opposed to development that does not take into consideration the massive problems it will cause. The original plans for Atlantic Plaza II were not excessive, and I'm not quite sure why the City would even consider deviating from the development regulations now in place. I sincerely thank you for postponing the Commissioners meeting until the 13th. Thank you for listening to all of us. I hope you continue to listen. Should you run for office opposed in March, I wish you all good fortune. Most Sincerely, Emma Betta 50 East Road Unit 7E Delray Beach, FL 33483 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Nubin, Chevelle Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 4:17 PM To: Wynn, Kimberly Subject: FW: Atlantic Plaza II Development Project Fyi. Chevelle D. Nubin, MMC City Clerk City of Delray Beach FACC Southeast District Director 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 561-243-7051 From: Joan Korostoff [mailto:joanekorostoff@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 3:19 PM To: Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; McDuffie, Woodie Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Development Project Dear Mayor and Commissioners of Delray Beach: I have participated in a number of community focus groups regarding the development of this parcel of land. I am against the current proposal for the following reasons: 1. The planned density exceeds the city's current codes. 2. Increased tax revenues do not outweigh my desire to maintain our reputation as a "village by the sea." 3. The developer has not explained what type of jobs will be created or where they will be located. 4. The impact on traffic, parking and public safety has not been satisfactually addressed. Please discuss these areas of concern at you upcoming meeting on November 13, 2012. Sincerely, Joan Korostoff 50 East Road Unit 12 B Dedray Beach, Fl 33483 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Nancy Reagan <nancy@nancyreagansblog.com> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 1:08 PM To: McDuffie, Woodie; Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; CityClerk@MyDelrayBeach.com Subject: Atlantic Plaza Project Hello, I don’t need to tell you that I had a spa (N. Reagan Spa) in Atlantic Plaza for years (since 1998) and waited, and waited and waited for the plaza to be rebuilt and revitalized. Years and years went by with tenants unable to make it, empty storefronts, and unkempt landscape. Every time a plan was suggested, there was either not enough development money, nor were the developments plans feasible. Now there is a great chance to make this old, tired plaza into a vital and integral part of Atlantic Avenue. Just imagine what it would be like to have this area once again booming. Yes, there will be issues with traffic, but you can plan for that as you have done in other areas of the downtown Delray. Please consider this plan to redevelop the area—for the future of the tenants in Atlantic Plaza and for the east block area of Atlantic Avenue. The area is a gold mine for Atlantic Avenue. Sincerely, Nancy Reagan Bella Reina Spa 561-404-7670 www.BellaReinaSpa.com 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: benbaffer@aol.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 2:14 PM To: McDuffie, Woodie; Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; CityClerk@MyDelrayBeach.com Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Dear Trusted Commissioners: I urge you to vote favorably on the Atlantic Plaza II Redevelopment Project. The city needs this project. East Atlantic Avenue needs this project. And our beach community needs this project. As a longtime Delray Beach family heavily involved with the Seagate neighborhood, we have witnessed the incredible transformation of downtown Delray Beach from forgotten blight into one of the most vibrant, energetic, desirable, and successful cities in the country. Our city has been so successful that communities from all over the world come here to try to figure out how we did it. However, this didn't just happen by chance. It took tremendous leadership, vision, and courage by public officials and private stakeholders every step of the way. And in order for our success to be sustainable, our city needs to continue to grow. A project like Atlantic Plaza II doesn't come along often. It takes years of work, investment, and commitment from numerous entities to get to this point. These types of projects are few and far between, especially in an economy that is still struggling to gain traction. Please do not pass on this opportunity. I totally respect the opinions of my friends and neighbors who oppose this project. It reinforces how deeply the residents of Delray Beach care about their community. Atlantic Plaza II is a large project, and large projects by nature are intimidating. However, properly designed and managed, the impact on the community can be extremely positive. The development team and city staff have exhaustively studied the impact of this project, and continue to listen to the concerns of the community to ensure that Atlantic Plaza II will be a huge benefit to the City and the East Atlantic Avenue community. Similarly, people often resist change when they are satisfied with the status quo. Unfortunately, if we choose to accept the status quo and fail to maintain economic growth, we will not sustain the success that we have been building over the last two decades. Now is the time for leadership, vision, and courage. I urge you to vote favorably on the Atlantic Plaza II Redevelopment project. Sincerely, Benjamin J. Baffer 924 Seagate Drive 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Smith, Douglas Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 11:13 AM To: Dorling, Paul; Agenda Coordinator Subject: FW: Atlantic Plaza II FYI Doug Smith Assistant City Manager City of Delray Beach 100 NW 1st Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 Phone: (561) 243-7144 Fax: (561) 243-7199 Email: smithd@mydelraybeach.com Web: www.mydelraybeach.com Follow CityDelrayBeach on Twitter From: Mike Cruz [mailto:cruzermon@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 9:04 AM To: McDuffie, Woodie; Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al Cc: CityManager@MyDelrayB each.com; AsstCityMgr@MyDelrayBeach.com; ACMSmith@MyDelrayBeach.com Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Dear Mayor and City Commissioners, I am a 21-year resident of Delray Beach. I have seen the city transform into what it is today, and in general, I am very happy with the progress. I am very concerned, however, with the amount of residential units being proposed for the Atlantic Plaza II project. 442 residences is just too many. Downtown won't be able to cope with this many more people living in such a confined area; the ease of access of everything we are accustomed to using, will no longer be easy. The "charm" of our great city is disappearing. All the hard work of the past 25 years can be ruined by poor decisions made now. Please decide to limit the residences to the original number of 197. Adding more rental units just allows for more transient residents, which we already know we don't want in Delray. We want permanent residents/owners. You do not need to cater to all of the requests of the developer. They are not going anywhere else; they own 9 acres of land they spent years acquiring. They want to be here. Thank you, Mike and Karen Cruz 1510 N. Swinton Ave. 561-350-7360 RALF BROOKES ATTORNEY Board Certified in City County and Local Government Law City of Delray Beach Re: Atlantic Plaza II -Public Hearing November 13, 2012 Dear City of Delray Beach: I represent numerous adjoining and nearby property owners to the proposed project including John Papaloizos at 50 East Rd.8H, Delray Beach Fl. 33483 who will be affected by the increase in traffic, insufficient parking, incompatible uses, density, mass, scale, height of proposed buildings. My clients object to the request to:  exceed a height of 48 feet (59’ 4” proposed);  increase the residential density of the project from 30 units dwelling units per acre to 51.10 proposed dwelling units per acre for total of 442 proposed dwelling units; and  traffic, parking and transportation impact of vehicles on the residential neighborhood Please consider our objections to Atlantic Plaza II because the project as proposed is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not in compliance with City Land Development Code including Section 2.4.5(E)(5): (5) Findings: In addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the City Commission must make findings that establishing the conditional use will not: (a) Have a significantly detrimental effect upon the stability of the neighborhood within which it will be located. Section 4.3.4(J)(4)(b)(iv)(3) “That open areas, such as courtyards, plazas, and landscaped setbacks, be provided in order to add interest and provide relief from the building mass.” Section 4.4.13(I) Central Business (CBD) District: (A) Purpose and Intent: The Central Business District (CBD) Zone District is established in order to preserve and protect the cultural and historic aspects of downtown Delray Beach and simultaneously provide for the stimulation and enhancement of the vitality and economic growth of this special area. Central Core: The regulations are intended to result in development that preserves the downtown’s historic moderate scale, while promoting a balanced mix of uses that will help the area evolve into a traditional, self-sufficient downtown. Section 3.2.3 (D) : “The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. lf it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted.” Section 3.2.3 (E) “Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations.” Section 3.2.3 (I)(1) : “Performance Standards These standards shall apply to all applications for new development and modification of existing developments which would result in a density greater than thirty (30) dwelling units per acre in the Commercial Core…. (1)…Notwithstanding the above, the approving body may deny an application for increased density where it is determined that the proposed project is not compatible in terms of building mass and intensity of use with surrounding development.” Comprehensive Plan Future Land use Element, Objective C-3 “The Central Business District (CBD) and surrounding neighborhoods, including A-1-A, Seacrest and Swinton Avenue represents the essence of what is Delray Beach i.e. a "village by the sea". The continued revitalization of the CBD is essential to achieving the overall theme of the City's Comprehensive Plan by managing growth and preserving the charm. The following policies and activities shall be pursued in the achievement of this objective” Policy C-3.2: “Downtown Delray Beach Master Plan represents the citizen’s vision for the growth and unification of Delray Beach, while still retaining the village like community by-the-sea character of the CBD...Future development in this area shall be consistent with the Master Plan.” Transportation Element Objective A-2: “The traffic circulation system, and improvements thereto, shall be coordinated with new development as depicted on the Future Land Use Map in order … provide for adequate and safe access …” Transportation Element Goal "B" : “The maintenance and enhancement of the city's existing quality of life shall be complimented by a convenient, safe and efficient street system which maintains an optimal level of service. The system shall keep the local trafficways of Delray Beach uncongested, thus retaining one of the unique attributes of the Delray Beach quality of life and providing an environment which is safe for the diversity of travel habits which are exhibited by Delray Beach residents.” Transportation Element Goal "C" : “A convenient, safe and efficient transportation network which emphasizes safety and which meets the needs of residents, both year-round and seasonal, shall be created. Its focus shall be upon avoiding congestion and accommodating all forms of travel throughout the city.” Downtown Master Plan: "Preserve the Character of the City: The City of Delray Beach is a good place to live, shop, work, and relax. It possesses small town attributes, great physical structure and charm. It is important to preserve these qualities... “Introduction, page 1“Encourage development without displacement at an appropriate scale: Encourage development fronting long Atlantic Avenue, with three stories as ideal height and four stories being the maximum desired height." Introduction, page 1 Goal and Objective -"To create building forms of a character and scale that reinforces the Citizens' vision of a 'City of urban amenities with a small town feeling.' " Project (Master Plan) Goal and Objectives, (Page 4) Citizen Testimony: Citizen testimony regarding compatibility is permissible and constitutes substantial competent evidence, so long as it is fact-based. Mere generalized statements of opposition are to be disregarded, but fact-based neighborhood testimony regarding compatibility is competent substantial evidence. Metropolitan Dade County v. Blumenthal 675 S.2d 598 (Fla. Dist. App. 3d 1996). Conclusion: The “approving body may deny an application for increased density where it is determined that the proposed project is not compatible in terms of building mass and intensity of use with surrounding development” under Section 3.2.3 (I)(1) of the Land Development Regulations, and must deny a conditional use that will have “a significantly detrimental effect upon the stability of the neighborhood” under Section 2.4.5(E)(5)(Conditional Use). Please make a motion to DENY the proposed Conditional Use as set forth in the staff report, Alternative Action “C”. Staff Report page 3. Sincerely Ralf Brookes Attorney Ralf Brookes Attorney Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law by The Florida Bar 1217 E Cape Coral Parkway #107 Cape Coral Florida 33904 1 R A L F B R O O K E S, A T T O R N E Y Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law MEMORANDUM OF LAW FROM: Ralf Brookes Attorney Date: November 9, 2012 Issue: Can an application for a Conditional Use be denied? Answer: YES, An application for a conditional use should be denied if “competent, substantial evidence”1 introduced at the public hearing indicates that the conditional use application: (1) does not meet the intent of the zoning district in the LDC, (2) fails meets any of the criteria listed in the LDC, or (3) is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan2. Citizen testimony in a zoning compatibility is permissible and constitutes substantial competent evidence, so long as it is fact-based. Mere generalized statements of opposition are to be disregarded, but fact-based testimony is competent substantial evidence on a conditional use. Metropolitan Dade County v. Blumenthal 675 S.2d 598 (Fla. Dist. App. 3d 1996). In Blumenthal, the lay testimony went to the incompatibility of the proposed development with the surrounding uses, was found to be sufficient, based on essentially undisputed facts in the record about the adjacent existing development and existing zoning around the subject site. The competent substantial evidence in the Blumenthal opinion included maps of existing uses introduced by the lay witness and a county planning map of the general area. Subsequent cases have applied the Blumenthal principle to citizen testimony and other evidence in different settings, further explaining the standard: Miami-Dade County v. Walberg, 739 So. 2d 115 (Fla. App., 1999) at 116, 117 (finding neighbors' testimony and site plan, existing uses map to constitute substantial competent evidence upon which to uphold the denial of the zoning application); 1 De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 S.2d 912, 916 (Fla. 1957). 2 All development must be consistent with the duly adopted comprehensive plan. See §163.3215 Florida Statutes. Pinecrest Lakes, Inc. v. Shidel, 795 So.2d 191 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), rehearing denied,802 So.2d 486 petition for review denied 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1260 (Fla. 2001). 2 Metro. Dade County v. Sec. 11 Prop. Corp., 719 S.2d 1204, 1205 (Fla. Dist. App. 3d 1998), rev. denied, 735 S.2d 1287 (Fla. 1999) (upholding the county commission's denial of a special exception for a mini self-storage facility, based on lay testimony on incompatibility, plus documentary evidence of record, including a proposed site plan, elevation drawings, and an aerial photograph introduced by the applicant); and Metro. Dade County v. Sportacres Dev. Group, Inc., 698 S.2d 281, 282 (Fla. Dist. App. 3d 1997) (approving the county commission's denial of a zoning application based in part on lay testimony that the proposed development would be incompatible with the existing adjacent community, bolstered by maps and other zoning records). Conclusion: A denial of a conditional use application can be sustained where “competent, substantial evidence” introduced at the public hearing indicates that the conditional use application : (1) does not meet the intent of the zoning district as stated in the LDC, (2) fails meets any of the criteria listed in the LDC, or (3) is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Failure to demonstrate compliance with the LDC (intent of the zoning districts and conditional use general criteria), consistency with the Comprehensive Plan are sufficient grounds for denial. Ralf Brookes Attorney 1217 E Cape Coral Parkway #107 Cape Coral Fl 33904 (239) 910-5464 Ralf@RalfBrookesAttorney.com 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Nubin, Chevelle Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 12:42 PM To: Wynn, Kimberly Subject: FW: Atlantic Plaza II FYI. Chevelle D. Nubin, MMC City Clerk City of Delray Beach FACC Southeast District Director 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 561-243-7051 From: ebetta@comcast.net [mailto:ebetta@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 8:26 AM To: carneyfordelray@gmail.com Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Dear Mr. Carney, A concerned neighbor forwarded me your thoughtful message, regarding the development of Atlantic Plaza II. I thank you for your willingness to listen to the voters. I have lived in Delray Beach for a number of years and love the city. On the one hand, I am certainly in favor of any development that will augment the existing charm and ambiance of Delray Beach. On the other, I do not think the proposed development of Atlantic Plaza II will serve as an enhancement but, rather, will cause a negative impact on the city for a variety of reasons. First, the gridlock the the addition of automobiles of renters of the proposed residential units will cause conjures an awesome picture. As it is now, the opening of the Intracoastal bridge on Atlantic Avenue incurs backups for blocks on Atlantic Avenue, as well as on the side streets, such as 7th. At a meeting last Thursday evening, the developer's representative stated that residents of Atlantic Plaza II would probably walk or ride their bicycles. I do not think it wise to plan, based upon presumptions. Residents of Atlantic Plaza II will, at the very least, have to get to work and back home again. The proposed offices and retail spaces will also bring more traffic into and out of the city. The notion that, no matter what traffic study has been performed for the developer, a drastic increase in density will not cause an equally drastic increase in vehicular traffic defies common sense and logic and gives one pause for thought about ramifications such as life-safety issues. Does anyone want to presume that ambulances, fire engines, etc. will not have a more difficult time reaching their destinations in a timely manner? Then, the design of the proposed Atlantic Plaza II, although aesthetically pleasing on paper and out of context, is in no way compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. There is nothing in the area even nearing the scale of the proposed project. The surrounding communities, such as those in the Marina District and on 7th, are comprised primarily of single-family homes and small rental apartment 2 buildings. These two, only examples of others nearby, are quiet, residential neighborhoods. Granting the variance requested by the developers of Atlantic Plaza II will change the character of the area, making it crowded, noisy. Finally, I ask the commissioners to look to the future. Do we want to cater to the economic exigencies of a developer today to pay the price for density and incompatibility tomorrow? I would hope not. I encourage you to deny the requested variance, to require the developer to stick to the already approved plans that are in accordance with the vision of Delray that our city government has wisely fostered for years. Thank you for your consideration. Emma O. Betta 50 East Road 7E Delray Beach, FL 33483 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Nubin, Chevelle Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 12:43 PM To: Wynn, Kimberly Subject: FW: Atlantic Plaza FYI. Chevelle D. Nubin, MMC City Clerk City of Delray Beach FACC Southeast District Director 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 561-243-7051 From: N Ramachandran [mailto:nkrama1@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 8:50 AM To: Vice-Mayor Tom Carney Cc: ebetta@comcast.net; frankle@mydelraybeach.com; Nubin, Chevelle; Gray, Angeleta; jacqet@mydelraybeach.com; McDuffie, Woodie Subject: Re: Atlantic Plaza Dear Mr.Carney, I was going to express my opinion about Atlantic Plaza redevelopment project on Tuesday at the meeting.I was very involved with the 2008 plan as a concerned resident. Before drafting the 2008 plan, owner and the project planers called the community for ideas about incorporating the Veterans park in to the plan by the suggestion of Mayer and the commissioners. We had several town hall type meetings for ideas and came out with a beautiful design to incorporate Veterans park to the master-plan.the builders and the owner worked with us in planing.That was the first step.This took few months. Then we had several meetings with the builders and the owner for the depth and the height discussion.In all these meetings there were at least one or two commissioner's and most of the time the Mayer also came to observe. After all these planing only the next step was taken to approve the project.I feel that was the way we should have approached this project.The Mayer took such keen interest in this project to make sure this project blend in beautifully to give a special lift to the beauty and the unique quality to Delray beach. This is not a small thing to rush through without serious discussion and planing. Veteran's park has over three acres of land with the inter coastal water on one side that the city owns.This park is a unique feature in our city.We use this park for several activities,has a beautiful children's playground,city gets revenue from the tour boats,people conduct weddings have morning yoga classes outside and so on. With out incorporating this park in the plan it will be a huge mistake to take some money for it and walk away. This new project without incorporating the park will look so out of place and the park will never be used the same way.I hope you all will think about this also with all the other concerns.Thank you.Nalini Ramachandran. 2 F rom: Vice-Mayor Tom Carney <carneyfordelray@gm. ail.com> To: nkrama1@yahoo.com Sent: Sun, November 11, 2012 7:02:59 PM Subject: Atlantic Plaza If you are having trouble viewing this message, see it in your browser. Dear Friends: On Tuesday, the City Commission will be voting on the proposed Atlantic Plaza redevelopment project. Private investment in Delray Beach is important for our City to continue to thrive. New development projects need to be b don’t disrupt the quality of life of residents or change the look and feel of current neighborhoods. This is important to me a principle in my decision making. Regarding the Atlantic Plaza redevelopment project, I have made it a priority to meet with community leaders and attend n meetings to better educate myself on the issue and learn more about the concerns of residents. By law I am prohibited from stating my position or how I will vote on an issue prior to it coming to the Commission. Nevert learning all I can about this project and listening to the concerns of residents so I can make a responsible and informed de Please feel free to contact me at Tom@ThomasCarney.com to share with me your thoughts on the Atlantic Plaza Redeve hear from you on this important issue. Thank you. Tom Carney You can watch the City Commission meeting this Tuesday at City Hall or online at your convenience. City Commission Workshop Tuesday, November 13 6:00 pm City Hall Commission Chambers 100 NW 1st Avenue 3 Watch the Workshop online: http://clicks.electionemail.com/trkr/?c=20456&g=61&u=901a16c495e84878bf557446fd3a02a5&p=c2594fd55562cb6045d0 facebook" title= Paid by Tom Carney for Delray Beach Mayor This message sent to nkrama1@yahoo.com by carneyfordelray@gmail.com Tom Carney for Mayor 455 NE 5th Avenue Suite D-211 Delray Beach, FL 33483 You opted in to this list from: Quick Add (More info) Unsubscribe | ManageURL | Forward to a Friend MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: November 9, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM WS.1 -SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2012 PROPOSED PARTNERSHIP WITH THE YMCA OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Attached is a conceptual outline for partnering with the YMCA for development and operation of the Family Fun and Fitness Center as a YMCA on the northwest corner of Lake Ida Road and Congress Avenue. BACKGROUND City staff have met several times with representatives of the South Palm Beach County YMCA to explore how we might work together to develop a recreational facility on our property at Lake Ida Road and Congress. As a result of these discussions the YMCA wrote a conceptual outline of how such a partnership might work. We have also spoken with some other cities which have such partnerships to ensure the idea was workable. The proposal as shown on the conceptual site plan is to move the lawn bowling and shuffleboard courts from Veteran's Park to this site. These courts and some meeting rooms would be accessible to City residents on the same basis as in other City owned facilities without them being members of the YMCA. The details of this access would be spelled out in a formal agreement. The City would build and own the facility. The YMCA could either pay us rent or put money into a renewal and replacement reserve. The City would have no operating costs associated with the facilities or the recreational programs offered there. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the staff be authorized to begin work on drafting a formal partnership agreement for construction and operation of a community recreational facility to be operated as a YMCA on the City's property at Lake Ida and Congress. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH AND YMCA OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY PARTNERSHIP PROPOSAL WHO ARE WE? • The Y is a charity that is a vital part of the community. • The Y is a welcoming place to learn new skills and connect with others. • The Y enriches the well-being of people of all ages and walks of life. • The Y never turns anyone away, regardless of their ability to pay. 2 Partnership Proposal| ©2011 YMCA of the USA THE YMCA OF SPBC • Awarded more than $500,000 in financial assistance, enabling youth, families and seniors to participate in Y programs, who otherwise would be unable to participate. • Connected more than 1,100 teens aged 13-18 years with caring adult role models in programs and activities that teach leadership skills and build selfconfidence. • Supported nearly 6,000 children in quality, values-based programs that promote healthy development. • Engaged 800 volunteers to lead and guide the vision and mission of the YMCA. 3 | Partnership Proposal| ©2011 YMCA of the USA OPPORTUNITY • The Y has a gap in coverage between Boynton Beach and Boca Raton. • Delray Beach is in need of a Community Center. • Proposed plan will meet the needs of both the city of Delray Beach and the YMCA. 4 | Partnership Proposal ©2011 YMCA of the USA BUILDING AND LOCATION • The City will build, furnish, and own a comprehensive fitness and recreation center on its property at the corner of Lake Ida Road and Congress Avenue. 5 | Partnership Proposal| ©2011 YMCA of the USA FAMILY FUN AND FITNESS CENTER DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MANAGEMENT • The YMCA will manage and operate the facility for 30 years, with three 10 year extensions, as a YMCA membership organization. 7 | Partnership Proposal ©2011 YMCA of the USA CITY ACCESS • Preferred Membership rates for Delray residents • Community meeting space • Children’s playground • Relocate shuffleboard and lawn bowling 8 | Partnership Proposal| ©2011 YMCA of the USA OPERATIONS • The YMCA will be responsible for all operating expenses and ongoing capital expenses related to the facility, including programs, insurance, personnel, maintenance and occupancy. 9 | Partnership Proposal ©2011 YMCA of the USA COMMUNITY BENEFIT • Municipalities frequently have to subsidize the ongoing operations of community centers with tax dollars. • The plan relieves Delray Beach from the responsibility and expense of operating recreation centers. • Collaborating with the YMCA to build and operate a world class facility provides Delray Beach with a facility that it wants without the burden of operating it. 10 | Partnership Proposal | ©2011 YMCA of the USA • The YMCA’s national brand and reputation • Jobs creation with an estimated payroll of $2 million, as well as local ADDITIONAL BENEFITS volunteer involvement in governance and programs • Financial assistance to qualified applicants • Partnerships with other nonprofit organizations • Community strengthening programs related to youth development, healthy living, and social responsibility SERVING ALL POPULATIONS • YMCA facilities and programs serve all populations and Community Demographics • Children participate in licensed preschool and after school programs as well as sports, aquatics, camps, and a variety of other activities. • Seniors are involved in a comprehensive schedule of exercise and social programs. • Adults engage in wellness, sports, and community engagement. • Families have access to all of the above as well as activities that involve parents and children together. 12 | Partnership Proposal ©2011 YMCA of the USA LITERACY AND LEADERSHIP Y’s provide programs for youth & adults • Literacy and leadership development for youth and adults • Drowning prevention 13• Diabetes prevention • Learning gap activities to mitigate the summer learning gap for lower income children Partnership Proposal| ©2011 YMCA of the USA NEXT STEPS • Further develop site plan • Finalize Operating Agreement 14 | Partnership Proposal ©2011 YMCA of the USA THANK YOU YMCA of South Palm Beach County 6631 Palmetto Circle South Boca Raton, FL 33433 561.395.9622 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: November 9, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM WS.2 -SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2012 FINANCIAL REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS -DELRAY BEACH MEMORIAL GARDENS MUNICIPAL CEMETERY ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Attached is the Financial Review Board's report and recommendations regarding operation of the City's cemetery together with staff comments and responses. BACKGROUND A member of the Financial Review Board conducted a study of the operation of the City's cemetery. Based on this study he produced a report with recommendations which was adopted by the Board. This report with staff comments and responses is being presented to the Commission for your consideration. Some of the recommendations have been implemented while there are others with which staff disagrees. Staff from the City Clerk's Office and Parks and Recreation will be present to answer any questions the Commission may have. RECOMMENDATION The Commission may wish to give direction in some cases where the Board and staff disagree. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From: Harden, David Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 2:34 PM To: Wynn, Kimberly Subject: FW: FRB cemetery recommendations 4 9 2012 Attachments: 201209261528.pdf; Cemeterygravelist.pdf ; Cemeteryintermentrequest.pdf Please attach all of this as backup for the cemetery agenda item. From: Harden, David Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:17 PM To: CHRISTINA (christinadelray@gmail.c om); Reade, Richard Cc: Nubin, Chevelle; Karch, Linda; Simmons, Tim Subject: FW: FRB cemetery recommendations 4 9 2012 Below you will find the staff's comments regarding the Financial Review Boards report concerning operations of the City Cemetery. We will schedule this for presentation to the City Commission at a work session, probably in November. City of Delray Beach Financial Review Board Final Recommendations: City Cemetery April 9, 2012 BACKGROUND: The Delray Beach Memorial Gardens, originally named Pine Ridge Cemetery, has been part of the City of Delray Beach since the City’s inception in 1911. (Actually the cemetery started in 1902 when land for a cemetery was given to the Ladies Improvement Association. The Association deeded it to the City in 1914) It was expanded greatly in 1995 and now covers over 38 acres and contains a mausoleum. According to information on the City’s website, record-keeping was always a challenge for the Cemetery with many early burials impossible to locate and maintenance being haphazard, leaving many families to tend to the upkeep of their own plots. (We believe our records are accurate from at least 1976, and probably from 1973.) Presently, the City Clerk’s office (561.243.7050) is responsible for plot sale information and maintaining an up-to-date database of cemetery occupants and plot owners. According to the City’s website, additional information on burial records can be obtained from the Palm Beach Genealogical Society at 561.832.3279. (The Genealogical Society has published a book entitled Delray Beach Memorial Gardens Index of Burials September 1903 – September 1987 which, among other listings, lists by block and lot the names of persons buried there and the date of their death. The City Clerk’s Office has a copy of this book.) CURRENT CEMETERY OPERATIONS ANALYSIS: Mr. Jack Hallahan, FRB Member, researched the Cemetery operations and was informed that in January 1988 the Cemetery’s management was turned over to Total Prearrangements, Inc. on a twenty (20) year contract. They were to manage sales of property and build a mausoleum. The City was to handle all of 2 the maintenance, interments, site assignments, etc. Total Prearrangements defaulted on the agreement. After seventeen (17) months it was given to another company to manage, named Prearrangements with the same functions. Under Total Prearrangements they sold property and gave deeds. Money was collected by this company during the 17 months, but there are no records. During the twenty (20) years of contracted outside management, City Employee Robert Johnson, the Cemetery Supervisor, “manually” kept records of who was buried and where. After the operation of the Cemetery was brought back to City control, in 2008, Mr. Johnson was reportedly told he no longer needed to keep records, so he stopped. His records are the only ones in existence and now they are incomplete. (This is incorrect. When the City took back control of cemetery operations the City Clerk began keeping records in digital media using Pontem Cemetery Software. The Parks Department and the City Clerk’s Office have compared their records and found that the Clerk’s office has the same records as the Parks Department either in their computer records or in a hard copy file.) Mr. Hallahan received a copy from City Clerk’s Office of all of the plots that were sold and interments made over the past three (3) years. The City sold a total of thirty-five (35) gravesites, and there were 416 people buried. (Staff review of Fiscal Years 2009, 2010 and 2011 found 411 burials and 63 gravesites sold. See attached report.) This shows the pre-sold inventory is being depleted but there are no records of the inventory. An intensive investigative method would be needed to determine who is buried where and which plots sold prior to 2008 are in use. Of the 35 plots that were sold since 2008, there are reportedly no records to show if they were used. (Information on whether plots have been used is recorded in the Pontem software. One can enter the block. lot and plot information in the digital record and the record will show if the plot is occupied or not.) The City charges Opening and Closing Fees yet there are reportedly no records showing for which plots these fees were paid and no cross-referencing of fees to plots. (Every burial is pursuant to an “Interment Request” which shows the block, lot and plot for which the fees are paid. See the attached example.) Hence, there appears to be a lack of records showing which plots are in use and which are vacant. (This and the preceding paragraph are incorrect. The Pontem Cemetery Software can produce a listing entitled “Delray Beach Municipal Cemetery Graves List”. See the attached example. This list shows for every block, lot and plot the status as “Occupied”, “Sold” or “Reserved/Pre-need”. Plots which are in use are shown as “Occupied”. Vacant plots are shown as “Sold” or “Reserved/Pre-need”. “Reserved/Pre-need” means they are being paid for on a time payment plan. There is still work to be done to enter some of the information from the manual records into the software.) According to site plans of the Cemetery, there is a large drain pipe running through part of the Cemetery that reportedly rendered over 100 plots as unusable. Mr. Omar Bowra of the City Engineering Department deserves credit for his work in helping find the solution for the piping issue. First, he supplied Mr. Hallahan with the design piping drawings and was requested to and then capable of superimposing the involved piping drawings on to the Cemetery Plot Plan. This combined plan showed the 36” drain pipe appeared not to interfere with the burial sites in question. This was later confirmed during an on-site inspection. Mr. Hallahan attempted to meet with City Employee Tim Simmons to discuss and ascertain whether the 102 plots marked as unusable due to a 36” drain pipe were, indeed, usable. Mr. Simmons was not available so he met with Robert Johnson, Cemetery Supervisor, and his immediate supervisor, Mr. Simmons’s assistant. They walked the 36” pipe and proved that there is sufficient distance from any of the plots and determined that these 102 plots could be sold and used. The City Clerk reminded Mr. Hallahan that the City Manager is the only one that has the authority to release the plots for sale. (Apparently there was some miscommunication on this issue. These plots have been made available for sale and no action by the City Manager is required.) In September, 2011, Mr. Hallahan was informed that there was to be a meeting between Parks and Recreation and the City Clerk’s Office to confirm the number of grave sites available for sale. Mr. Hallahan asked if he would be invited to attend that meeting and was told “No”. He was also told the meeting will not be recorded and no minutes will be taken. Mr. Hallahan has been recently informed by the City 3 Clerk’s office that this meeting has not been held as of this date. (Staff from the City Clerk’s Office and Parks and Recreation have met several times to work on merging their records. One of the outcomes of these meetings will be a complete list of available grave sites.) Lastly, it is noted that the Annual Income from Cemetery operations is roughly $60,000 while the annual cost to operate the Cemetery is approximately $400,000. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. First and foremost, the City Clerk’s office needs to determine what plots have been presold but not yet used, the current “sold” inventory and what “sold” plots are not paid in full. Further, the total unsold inventory of plots available for sale needs to be ascertained and documented; (This is being worked on as staff time permits.) A suggested method of gathering this information is to include a “Notice to Residents” on the City website asking Residents to immediately contact the City Clerk’s office if they have a claim or a deed to a City cemetery plot and bring the documentation in for verification. This Notice could also be included in “News to Neighborhoods” communication. The Notice should also state that any outstanding balances past due must be paid within sixty (60) days of the publication and/or notice date. All plots not fully paid by that date will be returned to the City’s inventory and any partial payments will be forfeited without recourse and/or as permitted by law. (When the City took back administration of the Cemetery in 2008 an audit was performed to determine which cemetery lots were sold on an installment plan by Prearrangements. The Finance Department put in a tremendous effort contacting those purchasers by letter and phone call. This resulted in some of the purchasers coming in to either pay in full or have the City buy back the lots. If the City was not contacted we have taken back the lots and have been selling them) After ascertaining the current status, records should be updated and computerized and processes should be set in place immediately for future sales, monitoring and inventorying of all plots plus documentation of all plot openings and closings; (This is already being done, except for entering some data from manual records into the computer record.) 2. There should only be one Cemetery Manager and that should be the City Clerk’s office. This office is currently responsible for all cemetery records, inventory, sales and communications relating to cemetery matters. The responsibility for Cemetery management (sales, records, handling all phone calls, emails and inquiries regarding the Cemetery and other administrative duties) should be handled solely by the City Clerk’s office with no involvement or oversight by the Parks and Recreation Department. It is strongly felt that having three (Two departments are involved; Parks and the City Clerk’s Office) separate City departments working on the Cemetery have contributed to the disorganization and lack of accurate records. (We have accurate records since at least 1976, and we do not see any evidence of disorganization.) Having one department solely responsible for the management will allow the processes and records to be streamlined and tracked more accurately; (This has been done since the City took back cemetery administration in 2008.) 3. The responsibility for physical and maintenance operations of the Cemetery should be transferred, along with the permanent on-site personnel, to the Public Works Department, since that Department’s Mission Statement appears more compatible with Cemetery activities than the much larger Parks and Recreation Department’s. A copy of each of the Mission Statements is attached hereto as Attachments #1 and #2; (City staff strongly disagrees. Public Works does not do any maintenance of turf, trees or shrubbery. On the other hand this type of work is the primary responsibility of the Parks Maintenance Division. When the cemetery needs extra help it is easy for Parks Maintenance to send fully qualified staff to assist. Furthermore, we look at the cemetery as a “park environment”.) 4. The staff member assigned to the Cemetery in the City Clerk’s office should meet regularly and as needed with the staff member assigned to oversee the Cemetery operation in the Public Works Department in order to facilitate open lines of communication between Management and the physical and maintenance operations of the Cemetery in order to avoid future misunderstandings; (There is 4 ongoing communication between the Clerk’s Office and Parks and Recreation staff regarding the cemetery.) 5. Attached is a listing of adult burial costs for Delray Beach and the neighboring city-owned and operated cemeteries for in-ground burials. This is Attachment #3. It is noted that Boca Raton reported having only one price as their experience has shown that getting around the non-resident classification is easily accomplished. Boca also charges a one-time Perpetual Care fee for all in-ground burials, in addition to the other normal and customary costs, a fee Delray Beach should also strongly consider charging. (Increases to cemetery fees were approved by the Commission on September 20.) Boynton Beach advised that they just moved their Cemetery operation to the Public Works Department from Parks and Recreation. (Boynton Beach has their entire Parks Maintenance function under Public Works, which is the way some cities organize themselves. In my experience, having Parks Maintenance in a different department leads to coordination problems and conflicts between park maintenance activities and park use activities.) This has nothing to do with our same recommendation, which has been discussed for months by the FRB, and which was not reported to Mr. Hallahan until 3/23/2012. In Deerfield Beach, non-Resident fees are much higher and proof of Residency of the Deceased is much more defined. Acceptable proof must be current and valid and must include a photo ID plus one other form of identification for the Deceased at a City address as follows: Voter Registration card Water bill Electric bill Bank statement Phone bill Current medical bill. Delray Beach’s proof of Residency is not definitive enough. The Administrative Policy, CC-2, Page 3 of 6, Paragraph 4 is shown on Attachment #4 hereto and should be updated; (Although not explicit in our policy, we look for the same kinds of proof or residency as does Deerfield. We have amended our policy on this point to be more explicit.) 6. A review of the Parks and Recreation Cemetery budget shows the following costs, as shown on Attachment #5 hereto: Supervision function: $79,916. This equates to $6,660 per month and $533 per burial; Interment function: $88,777. This equates to $7398 per month and $582 per burial; General Maintenance function: $207,926, including water expenses of over $50,000 per year. This equates to $5472 per acre per year and $1386 per burial. (Is it really appropriate to charge current burials for the ongoing maintenance costs for all the prior burials plus the vacant areas of the cemetery? That is what a perpetual care fee would be used for. The invested principal would generate enough income for the perpetual care of the cemetery when it is full.) These figures are based on 38 acres for the Cemetery and 150 in-ground burials per year. It is noted that these fees do not include the costs incurred by the City Clerk’s office in keeping the records for the cemetery operations, which is an additional $40,000+/-per year. (We did not add any staff to the Clerk’s Office when they were given responsibility for cemetery records maintenance and lot sales. In fact, their staff has since been reduced. The incremental cost in the Clerk’s Office is $862 annually. We strongly disagree with the $40,000 stated above.) It is recognized that all burials are not adult in-ground burials so these figures may be slightly “off”. The above-stated costs show a total cost of $2511 per burial as compared with present in-ground burial fees of $1100 (resident) and $1485 (non-resident) netting a LOSS of over $1000 per burial; (As indicated above, we do not believe it would be appropriate to charge current burials for the cost of maintaining previously used burial sites and vacant areas.) 5 7. It is highly recommended that the City Manager immediately review and approve the updating of the Cemetery plot inventory (work on this updating is ongoing and requires no approval from the City Manager) and adjustment of burial fees since the current fee structure is inadequate compared to the costs incurred and in comparison to the fees charged by neighboring cities; (Fee increases were approved by the Commission on September 20, 2012. Also, the City Clerk’s Office is working with Environmental Services GIS staff to develop a mapping program which will enable the Clerk’s Office to generate a map of the cemetery showing occupied plots, sold but vacant plots and available plots.) 8. The adequacy of burial sites within the City should also be addressed by the City Manager and City Clerk. As reported by the Sun Sentinel, which reported a few details incorrectly but covered most of the story properly, Boca Raton believes it has 80 to 100 years’ supply of plots and Pompano Beach, with 3000 plots, reports having a 50-year supply. Delray Beach City employee Tim Simmons stated that Delray Beach would run out of plots within 5 to 7 years, based on the current usage of 150 plots per year. This may or may not be the case since there is not currently a correct inventory of available plots but records show that only 35 plots have been sold in the last 3 years, starting in 2008. It is also noted that the Delray Beach Cemetery has a super-abundance of roadways, some of which could easily be converted to plots, extending the cemetery’s life another 50 to 100 years. Proper planning and land use would make a huge difference in the lifespan of the existing Cemetery. (We agree that as the cemetery fills there are access ways which can be platted into blocks and lots and sold.) 9. Pricing for all Cemetery categories should also be evaluated and adjusted to be in keeping with those of surrounding municipalities; (Staff agrees.) 10. It is noted that not all burials occur in the City Cemetery. There are many private cemeteries throughout Broward and Palm Beach counties as well as the new National Cemetery in Lantana. 11. Periodic reviews of the Cemetery operations should be performed at least every three years to update progress and to implement and benchmark future recommendations. The Financial Review Board wishes to Thank Board Member Jack Hallahan for his considerable efforts in researching this Department’s operations and in the formation of these considerable recommendations. 6 7 8 9 10 11 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Douglas E. Smith, Assistant City Manager THROUGH: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: November 9, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM WS.3 -SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2012 STATE AND FEDERAL LOBBYING SERVICES ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION The item before Commission is discussion of state and federal lobbying services. BACKGROUND At the October 16, 2012 Regular Meeting, the City Commission selected Ballard Partners to provide lobbying services to the City regarding transient housing legislation. The Commission also expressed interest in considering a full-service state lobbyist from the group of firms that had already submitted proposals. In addition, the Commission discussed federal level lobbying at the October 16 meeting. Staff requested additional information from the seven (7) firms that provided lobbying proposals: Ballard Partners, Capitol Alliance, Ericks Consultants, Florida Strategic Group, Greenberg Traurig, Ronald Book, and Weiss, Handler & Cornwell. Additional information from each firm is attached along with the original proposals. The additional information requested provided includes confirmation of the types of lobbying service offered, types of federal lobbying services/assistance that may be available, and information on several bills that the firms lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session. Some information about the firms has been summarized in the attached Comparison Table. A draft document for the City's 2013 state legislative priorities will be provided to the Commission prior to the workshop meeting. Staff will be prepared to discuss the various proposals at the Commission meeting. RECOMMENDATION Commission Discretion. State Lobbying Services -Summary Information Capitol Alliance Offices: Tallahassee Office plus professional associations with firms in West Palm Beach, Jacksonville, and Atlanta 2 $45,000 1 year No additional costs Yes Yes Yes, Palm Beach County, SFWMD, Army Corps Yes -in person, conference call, skype, video conferencing. Conf./video calls weekly during session. In person once a quarter or whenever necessary Yes, assist with strategic analysis of legislative needs and develop legislative agenda and educating/briefing Commission Yes, weekly during session; monthly during off session Yes, on specific issues. Also partner with Patton Boggs on various congressional appropriations issues. Very close relationship with FL Congressional delegation, and work closely with them on issues that impact FL and their clients. Strong relationships with White House and Executive Agencies and work on issues that affect their clients with those contacts. Work with Patton Boggs (full services federal lobbying firm) on legislation and appropriations items that affect their FL clients. City of Key West, Leon County, Port of Palm Beach , AT&T Develop City's Legislative Agenda Yes Clients have Included: Provide Federal Lobbying Services (summary of responses) Firm Name & Location # Legislative Lobbying Staff Assigned Cost Additional Costs (i.e. travel, printing) Max $250 per year. Anything else requires City preapproval Yes Yes Yes Boca Raton, Palm Beach Gardens, Palm Beach, Martin Co. & Polk Co. Yes Yes Lobby State Legislature Lobby Exec. Branch/State Agencies Lobby local and other agencies Meet on Regular Basis with City Provide Weekly Legislative Updates 3 (plus others as needed) $45,000 1 year Ballard Partners Offices: Tallahassee, West Palm Beach, Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa No. The Firm has for other clients in the past, assisted on an as needed basis (at no additional cost) with members of the Florida Delegation. Excellent relationships with nearly all Members of Congress from Florida and even several from outside the State. In any situation the firm can assist in setting up meetings or advocating for positions beneficial to the City, they are willing to do so. Have done this in the past specifically on federal appropriations projects and in helping with decisions out of the Army Corps of Engineers. Have partnered with federal lobbying firms: Patton Boggs, Alcalde & Fay, Barbour Griffith and Rogers. They would base their recommendation on the issues and scope of work needed. State Lobbying Services -Summary Information Develop City's Legislative Agenda Yes Clients have Included: Provide Federal Lobbying Services (summary of responses) Firm Name & Location # Legislative Lobbying Staff Assigned Cost Additional Costs (i.e. travel, printing) Max $250 per year. Anything else requires City preapproval Yes Yes Yes Boca Raton, Palm Beach Gardens, Palm Beach, Martin Co. & Polk Co. Yes Yes Lobby State Legislature Lobby Exec. Branch/State Agencies Lobby local and other agencies Meet on Regular Basis with City Provide Weekly Legislative Updates 3 (plus others as needed) $45,000 1 year Ballard Partners Offices: Tallahassee, West Palm Beach, Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa No. The Firm has for other clients in the past, assisted on an as needed basis (at no additional cost) with members of the Florida Delegation. Excellent relationships with nearly all Members of Congress from Florida and even several from outside the State. In any situation the firm can assist in setting up meetings or advocating for positions beneficial to the City, they are willing to do so. Have done this in the past specifically on federal appropriations projects and in helping with decisions out of the Army Corps of Engineers. Have partnered with federal lobbying firms: Patton Boggs, Alcalde & Fay, Barbour Griffith and Rogers. They would base their recommendation on the issues and scope of work needed. Ericks Consulting -offices in Tallahassee and Fort Lauderdale 4 $40,000 1 year All inclusive, except that for extensive travel, such as with federal issues, would request advance approval for expenses Yes Yes Yes, the entire team can lobby those and other agencies with the exception of Candice Eriks who cannot lobby Palm Beach County Yes Yes Yes Have strong relationships at the federal level and have assisted clients with federal issues. Many issues that they deal with at a state level are contingent on various Federal components. For example, they have worked for years collectively with clients such as Broward County, Palm Beach County, other cities, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority and JM Family on issues that require federal cooperation to succeed on a state or local level. Have also worked closely with the Administration for Children & Families’ Assistant Secretary, George Sheldon, who served as the Secretary of the Florida Department of Children & Family Services before leaving for DC. They have relationships with various firms and would help the City team with whichever firm would be most effective depending on the specific issue being addressed. Broward County, Broward County Property Appraiser, Broward County Sheriff, Coconut Creek, Coral Springs, Fort Lauderdale, North Lauderdale, Pembroke Pines, Plantation, Palm Beach County, Davie Florida Strategic Group Offices: Lakeland 2 $36,000 1 year None Yes Yes Yes -as necessary Yes Yes Yes Yes. Currently provide federal consulting for the City of Lakeland and can develop a similar program for the City of Delray Beach. City of Lakeland, FL Association of Code Enforcement Yes -imperative to gain understanding of issues important to City. Should be a collaborative effort. 2 (plus others available to assist) $60,000 1 year Travel. Expect to keep to minimum. Plus typically include pre-approval for expenses over a certain level. Yes Yes Would focus on state level. However they have strong working relationships with local agencies (DB County and SFWMD). In FL and DC, have expertise working with US Army Corps and Corps of Engineers Yes -regular meetings will ensure highest level of representation for the City. Will meet in manner that best suits City (in person or conference call) Yes -During session, legislative language can change quickly. Important that close contact is maintained to ensure they are appropriately advocating our position. Greenberg Traurig Offices: Tallahassee (other FL offices -Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Orlando, Palm Beach County, Tampa) City of North Port, Florida Association of Court Clerks, AT&T Yes. DC Governmental Affairs team has successfully provided legislative representation and lobbying at the federal level for a number of municipal clients. Their team has achieved fiscal and policy successes on behalf of their municipal clients, securing more than $250 million in funding over the past decade. State Lobbying Services -Summary Information Develop City's Legislative Agenda Yes Clients have Included: Provide Federal Lobbying Services (summary of responses) Firm Name & Location # Legislative Lobbying Staff Assigned Cost Additional Costs (i.e. travel, printing) Max $250 per year. Anything else requires City preapproval Yes Yes Yes Boca Raton, Palm Beach Gardens, Palm Beach, Martin Co. & Polk Co. Yes Yes Lobby State Legislature Lobby Exec. Branch/State Agencies Lobby local and other agencies Meet on Regular Basis with City Provide Weekly Legislative Updates 3 (plus others as needed) $45,000 1 year Ballard Partners Offices: Tallahassee, West Palm Beach, Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa No. The Firm has for other clients in the past, assisted on an as needed basis (at no additional cost) with members of the Florida Delegation. Excellent relationships with nearly all Members of Congress from Florida and even several from outside the State. In any situation the firm can assist in setting up meetings or advocating for positions beneficial to the City, they are willing to do so. Have done this in the past specifically on federal appropriations projects and in helping with decisions out of the Army Corps of Engineers. Have partnered with federal lobbying firms: Patton Boggs, Alcalde & Fay, Barbour Griffith and Rogers. They would base their recommendation on the issues and scope of work needed. Yes Yes Yes. During session, provide written reports weekly and phone and e‐mail updates as necessary for priority issues. Also provide written reports and updates coinciding with all interim committee meeting weeks in Dec., Jan.and Feb. Yes -maintain close working relationships with professionals in the Governor's office and state agencies. Yes -will also work closely with the Florida League of Cities on any item approved by the City. Yes -make themselves available to clients as requested. Able to meet with City officials/staff in Delray Beach or by conference call at any time Boca Raton, PBC Sheriff & Broward County Sheriff Yes. During legislative session will provide a weekly summary report detailing legislative action taken during the week, status of legislative issues, and anticipated action during the upcoming week. 19 Florida Cities & 4 Counties 3 $50,000 1 year None Yes Yes Yes Weiss, Handler & Cornwell Offices: Boca Raton, Tallahassee Ronald Book Offices: Aventura and Tallahassee Do not provide federal lobbying services, but can assist with arranging meetings with federal representatives, congressional staff and federal agencies. Extremely well accessed within the entire Florida Delegation and with many members outside of the Florida Delegation. Do not partner with any firms that provide federal lobbying services, but could provide a short list of firms that they believe the city should consider for federal lobbying services. Yes, Have many relationships with the Executive Branch, numerous agencies, and both Houses of Congress. Work on both legislative initiatives and Executive Branch implementation of adopted legislation. Firm's federal lobbying services are coordinated through Joseph Abruzzo 3 $35,000 Nov. 2012 -May 2013 Any additional expense must be agreed upon by City before incurred Yes -maintain an office in Tallahassee; there full time during committee weeks and legislative session and frequently when the legislature is not in session. Yes -currently lobby Palm Beach County for other clients and have close contacts and experience working with Palm Beach County Commissioners, Constitutional Officers and their respective staffs and the SFWMD City of Delray Beach -Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Ballard Partners Contact Information: Joe McCann, 403 East Park Avenue, Tallahassee, FL 32301. (850) 577-0444. 1. Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach Brian Ballard, President Joe McCann, Senior Vice President Mat Forrest, Governmental Consultant (Greg Turbeville, Carol Bracy and John Johnson to be utilized on an as needed basis) 2. List types of additional costs above the annual fee, if any (i.e. travel, printing, etc.) Maximum $250 per year. Anything else would have to be pre-approved by the City. 3. Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: a. Lobby State Legislature Yes b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes c. Lobbylocal and other agencies (i.e. Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). Yes d. Meet regularly with City elected officials and/or staff (i.e., inperson, conference call, etc.) Yes e. Develop City’s state legislative agenda Yes f. Provide weekly legislative updates during session Yes g. Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Yes Executive Branch and State Agencies 4. Does your firm provide federal lobbying services? If so, please describe. No. a. Ifyour firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, please describe the type of assistance that may be available. The Firm has for other clients in the past, assisted on an as needed basis (at no additional cost) with members of the Florida Delegation. We have excellent relationships with nearly all Members of Congress from Florida and even several from outside the State. In any situation where the Firm can assist in setting up meetings or advocating for positions beneficial to the City we are more than willing to do so. We have done this in the past specifically on federal appropriations projects and in helping with decisions out of the Army Corps of Engineers. Washington lobbying, however, is very difficult to do from Tallahassee for obvious reasons. The City would be better served to contract with a Firm in the D.C. area with relationships beyond Florida. b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partners with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. We have partnered with several federal lobbying firms. We have done work in the past with: Patton Boggs, Alcalde & Fay and Barbour, Griffith and Rogers. All provide full service in the federal lobbying arena. We would base our recommendation on the issue and scope of work needed. 5. Provide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session, and provide a summary of the final result. The Firm had a very busy legislative session last year. Examples of lobbying for/against are: On the appropriations front: we were successful in funding for the Elliott Museum in Martin County, funding for a work release program within the Department of Corrections, protecting nursing home’s from significant rate cuts, holding Miami Children’s Hospital harmless from medicaid cuts and other individual projects such as funding for the Baptist Hospital Outpatient facility. On the legislative side 2012 was a year with a great deal of defense. One example was one of the most controversial bills of the year. We were able to work to defeat legislation, against great odds, that would have made it very difficult to for physicians to continue dispensing medications to workers comp patients. City of Delray Beach ‐Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Capitol Alliance Group Contact Information: Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey (Jeff@capitolalliancegroup.com) 1. Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach 2 Professional staff assigned to City Client Services Management 1. Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey, Managing Partner 2. Ms. Barbara Flury 2. List types of additional costs above the annual fee, if any (i.e. travel, printing, etc.) No additional costs 3. Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: a. Lobby State Legislature Yes b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes c. Lobby local and other agencies (i.e. Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). Yes, Palm Beach County, SFWMD, Army Corps d. Meet regularly with City elected officials and/or staff (i.e., inperson, conference call, etc.) Yes, meetings in person, via conference call, skype, video conferencing 1. Conference Calls/Video calls on a weekly basis during legislative session; 2. In person meetings once a quarter or whenever necessary e. Develop City’s state legislative agenda Yes, we assist with strategic analysis of legislative needs and develop legislative agenda with all of our clients as well as assist in educating and briefing council members on agenda f. Provide weekly legislative updates during session Yes, weekly during session and Monthly during off session periods g. Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Executive Branch and Yes State Agencies 4. Does your firm provide federal lobbying services? If so, please describe. Yes, on specific issues. In addition we partner with Patton Boggs on various congressional appropriations issues. a. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, please describe the type of assistance that may be available. We have very close relationships with Florida Congressional delegation and staff and work closely with them on issues that impact Florida and our clients. In addition, we have strong professional and personal relationships with senior staff at the White House and Executive Agencies, such as US DOT,US Dept of Commerce, US DEP, Homeland Security and work on issues that affect our clients with thos e contacts b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partners with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. Patton Boggs is a full service federal lobbying firm with extensive congressional and Executive Branch contacts with both political parties. We work closely with them on legislation and appropriations items that affect our clients in Florida. They provide a full range of lobbying services and widely respected as one of the top 10 firms in DC 5. Provide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session, and provide a summary of the final result. SB 1996 – Dept of Economic Opportunity – prime advocate on bill related to community economic development and workforce housing, successful in passing language that authorized priority funding for workforce housing in various communities. HB 1223 – Relating to Highway Safety and motor Vehicles – we were successful in passing several provisions in this bill that would allow for FDOT to fund bicycle transportation as part of the state Strategic Intermodal system. State Legislative Lobbyist for the City of Delray Beach, Florida Proposal October 11, 2012 Submitted By: Capitol Alliance Group 106 E. College Ave #640 Tallahassee, FL 32301 Phone: (850)224-1660 Fax: (850)224-6785 Contact Person: Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey I.Introduction The Capitol Alliance Group is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Delray Beach for State Lobbying Services. As one of Florida’s top state level government relations’ firms in Florida with extensive experience in strategic issues’ management, public policy analysis and government relations advocacy for a diverse list of private and public sector clients, as well as the creation and development of transient rental ordinances. With strong bi-partisan Democratic and Republican credentials, each member of the firm possesses strong professional experience working in the private, public and legislative sectors and is widely recognized as being a leader in the Florida lobbying corps. The firm enjoys a strong reputation for unparalleled integrity, professionalism and commitment to its’ clients and to the lobbying process. The Capitol Alliance Group also has great contacts with Florida’s Congressional Delegation and would be willing to assist Delray Beach in their federal priorities with a cost effective partner. The CAG partners are experts at analyzing critical policy issues, assessing economic and political trends at the national, state and local levels, and evaluating and recommending political and legislative strategies for resolving the challenges facing businesses and local governments. The partners in the Alliance each have more than two decades of experience each working inside and outside of state and local governments at the highest level, including such diverse positions as former member of the Florida Legislature, State Agency Director, Senior Staff to the Governor and Consultant to the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Their professional experience, close working relationships with Governor Scott, the Speaker (and Speakers-elect) of the House, Senate President (and Senate Presidents-elect) and other top policy makers in the Executive and Legislative branches of government, coupled with their extensive knowledge of the political process, and their enthusiasm and stringent business ethics, makes The Capitol Alliance Group one of the premier lobbying and issues management groups in Florida and an excellent legislative consultant partner for City of Delray Beach. The firm’s clients represent a diverse cross section of public and private sector interests, but CAG is known for its strong knowledge base and expertise in legislative and agency issues related to local governments, including transportation, economic and tourism development, housing, urban and community development, property taxation and environmental permitting and regulation, among others. II.Firm Background The Capitol Alliance Group, Inc. has a stellar reputation as a government relations' consulting firm with a proven track record of success in serving a broad range of client's interest at the state and local level in Florida along with a strong presence in DC with the Florida congressional delegation. Created in 1995 in Tallahassee, FL by a team of seasoned government relations professionals with diverse political and professional lobbying experiences, the Capitol Alliance Group has client and professional interests ranging from Pensacola to Jacksonville to Key West. Led by Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey, the professional staff includes 6 research and support staff, all focused on providing high level, quality service to the diverse array of clients represented by the firm. The firm prides itself on outstanding client services, research driven strategies, and performance based outcomes. With offices in Tallahassee, and professional associations with firms in West Palm Beach, Jacksonville and Atlanta, the firm's partners have a strong understanding of the critical legislative and regulatory issues affecting businesses and organizations. The firm is best known for its’ ability to analyze complex policy issues, assess economic and political trends, and recommend successful political and legislative strategies for resolving the challenges facing their public and private sector clients. In addition, the firm’s core operating principles value straightforward, honest and frequent client communications to help manage and maintain client expectations during the ever-changing issue dynamics during the legislative session in Tallahassee -extremely important in working with local government elected officials and staff who need to understand the impact of policy decisions on their citizens and budgets. The members of Capitol Alliance Group understand the needs of local elected officials and staff and are extremely familiar with the issues facing local governments at the state level, and the possible implications they might have on the City of Delray Beach. Their close working relationships with top policy makers in the Executive and Legislative branches of government, extensive knowledge of the political process, unbridled enthusiasm and stringent business ethics, has made The Capitol Alliance Group one of the premier lobbying and issues management groups in the Southern region. III.Client Representation We have provided a summary list of clients the firm has represented over the last several years. As indicated, the firm’s government relations advocacy focuses on a wide variety of industry and local government interests affecting almost every aspect of Delray Beach and Florida; including: • Local government finance and operations • Aerospace • Property Taxation • Transportation • Information and Systems Technology • Public Safety and EMS • Coastal Erosion and Beach re-nourishment • Economic and Tourism Development • Property Insurance • Pension Funds and Retirement plans • Workforce and Affordable Housing • Sustainable Community Development • Growth Management • Telecommunications • Energy and Alternative Energies • Education • Health Care More importantly, Capitol Alliance Group professionals focus extensively on the state appropriations process, working hard to insert client budget priorities into the agency and Governor’s budget and working closely with the legislative appropriations members to ensure successful passage of budget items in the final appropriations bills. IV.Local Government Advocacy Experience CAG has represented local governments, special districts, and community public private partnerships to the Florida Legislature, Governor’s office and state agencies, including Leon County, City of North Miami, City of Key West, City of Tallahassee, and others. The firm has a first-hand understanding of local government financial and fiscal dynamics, infrastructure requirements, regulatory concerns, growth management pressures, and the unique, if not strained, working relationship that has emerged over the last several years between the legislature and local counties and cities. The CAG partners are well versed on the impact of “unfunded mandates” from the legislature, the recent fiscal pressures created by the property tax reform initiatives, as well as the unique legislative obstacles and opportunities available to City of Delray Beach. CAG has worked closely with the Florida League of Cities in pursuing their legislative agenda on behalf of all of it’s members. Recently, representing Leon County in the Capitol City, our role has often been to work closely with FAC and the League on the development of legislative strategies on a myriad of issues. V.Advocacy Team for the City of Delray Beach The Capitol Alliance Group will assign it’s top legislative professionals to service the contract with the City. Often times, lobbying firms will delegate responsibilities for local government issues to junior staff. CAG understands the complexities of local government issues and believes that its best team needs to be “on the field” to ensure success on these issues. For many years, state government passed frequent unfunded mandates on to cities and counties and questioned local governments’ home rule authority. Because of that mindset, we believe our top lobbyists need to be at the forefront communicating and advocating with legislators on the needs of the city. The following chart identifies the professional client management team assigned to the City of Delray Beach contract. Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey (Project Manager) – Dr. Sharkey is the founding member and Managing Partner of the firm. He has over 22 years of lobbying experience in addition to 6 years of employment at senior positions in the Executive and Legislative branches of Florida Government. His lobbying expertise includes transportation, infrastructure, growth management, affordable housing and ad valorem taxation. In addition, Dr. Sharkey is widely known for his knowledge of highway, transit, rail, seaport and airport funding, as well as growth management, water and waste water infrastructure regulation and financing. He is well versed on local government legislative issues, having represented the City of Tallahassee for 5 years and currently representing other cities and special districts around the state of Florida. Dr. Sharkey has been at the forefront of advocacy of affordable housing since the aftermath of Hurricane Andrew in 1992. He and the professionals in his firm have a great deal of expertise in successfully addressing the legislative and regulatory issues facing local governments and businesses interested in sustainable community development, infrastructure financing, and transportation access. He has developed strong professional relationships with the legislative leadership, committee and appropriations staff, the Governor’s office and Agency heads to ensure the needs of his clients are understood and respected. City of Delray Beach City Commission Mr. Joe Arnall (Associate Partner) Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey (Partner and Project Manager) Ms. Barbara Flury (Associate) Mr. Corey Peterson (Legislative Programs Director) In addition, Dr. Sharkey has been actively involved in statewide issue campaigns for over fifteen years, providing him rare insight into the politics and an ability to shape successful business and community development projects. He has been successful in creating, mobilizing and evaluating public policy issues and trends to position his clients to prepare and take advantage of new challenges and opportunities occurring in the arenas of state and local governments. He is ultimately familiar with the dynamics that are created when local, state and national politics intersect with the desire to shape public policy in the local, Legislative or Executive branches of government. Dr. Sharkey is closely attuned to the budget and other community issues facing the City of Delray Beach. Having lived in Palm Beach County for 5 years and spending ample time in Delray Beach, he is familiar with the structure and operations of local government and can help immediately to enhance the city visibility with state legislators and state agencies quickly and effectively. Dr. Sharkey began his professional career as a teacher and school administrator and has worked in England, Thailand, Latin America and in other parts of the world as a consultant for various international agencies. He has worked for the Dept of Education, Office of the Governor, and Florida Legislator, all in senior staff positions. A native of Minnesota, he holds a B.S. degree in English, a M.Ed. in Educational Research, a M.S. in Sociology and Economics and a Ph.D. from Florida State University in International Development. He serves on a multitude of non profit boards, including Florida Association of Volunteer Action for the Caribbean and the Americans, Children’s Miracle Network, member of Leadership Florida and He is also a small business owner with several restaurants in Tallahassee. He is married and lives in Tallahassee. Mr. Corey Peterson – Mr. Peterson is the Legislative Programs Manager for the Capitol Alliance Group and longtime resident of City of Delray Beach. During Corey’s tenure in City of Delray Beach, he was immersed in the issues effecting the county and it’s residents. Corey has specific City of Delray Beach knowledge of the space industry, coastal economic development, tourism, education and property insurance. With Four years of direct legislative experience with major appropriations issues and a concentrated focus on local governance, property taxation, and agency regulation issues, he has proven herself to be a tireless advocate for client’s interest. In addition to legislative issues management, he has developed excellent relations with the state agency management leadership and interfaces regularly with the agency Secretaries to ensure that clients have access to top decision makers. Mr. Peterson is a graduate of Florida State University. He is responsible for mobilizing legislation and communicating with legislators and agency representatives on the needs of the clients. Mr. Peterson lives in Tallahassee Mr. Joseph H. Arnall – Mr. Arnall was a member of the Florida Legislature from the Jacksonville area for 12years, from 1990 to 2002, serving as the powerful Rules Chair for the last 4 years of his career when the Republican minority took over as the majority. He is now a partner with Capitol Alliance Group and manages the Jacksonville and Atlanta offices. During his tenure in the legislature, he was respected by his colleagues as a strong advocate and expert in a variety issue areas, including insurance, growth management, transportation, telecommunications and banking. Mr. Arnall is a Chartered Life Underwriter and Financial Consultant by profession, and his business interests include insurance and real estate. He has been an effective lobbyist for a variety of client interests and has maintained his strong relationship with leadership in the Florida Legislature and Governor’s office. He has held membership in Chartered Life Underwriters, Jacksonville Chapter; Life Member of the Million Dollar Round Table; Jacksonville Chamber of Commerce; National Trust for Historic Preservation; and the American Legislative Exchange Council; the Georgia Chamber of Commerce and the Florida Chamber. VI.Why Choose Capitol Alliance Group  Ability, Character and Skill of the proposer to perform the Contract The Capitol Alliance Group is widely respected by Legislators, Executive Branch leadership and other lobbyists as one of the top statewide legislative advocacy firms in Florida. Based in Tallahassee, and with affiliated associates in West Palm Beach, and Jacksonville, the firm’s partner’s have over 50 years of experience working inside and outside of state and local governments. The firm’s principles have extensive experience representing cities, counties, special districts, and CRA’s as well as a wide variety of industries and businesses throughout the state so they understand how large and small policy decisions contemplated in the halls of the Capitol affect the ability of public and private entities to manage their organizations, customers and their future. The firm partners have personal experience working the process as legislators, legislative staff directors, senior Governor’s staff, cabinet aides and other positions within state government so they understand the culture of decision making within that environment. As private government relations professionals, they have represented a significant diversity of issues affecting almost every facet of Florida. Between the partners collectively, the firm has drafted and passed over 50 pieces of legislation, worked to secure hundreds of millions of dollars in appropriations and defeated hundreds of bills and amendments that would harm the interest of our clients. We have exceptionally strong skills in working the appropriations committees in the House and Senate as well as a wide variety of substantive committee issue areas. Representing local governments takes a unique set of skills and communication abilities, which members of CAG have honed to ensure we meet our local government client expectations. We have attached a letter of reference from the Leon County County Administrator, one of our local government clients with whom we have worked and performed successfully. We bring a unique blend of tireless enthusiasm, unparalleled knowledge of the legislative process, and exceptional advocacy skills to our clients needs. The firm has a strong affinity, history and understanding of issues directly related to the City. In particular, key members of the firm have longstanding ties to Palm Beach County. In addition the firm is one of the top lobbying firms in Florida on issues related to seaport, airport and intermodal transportation issues, having represented the Florida Ports Council for 10 years, the Florida Airports Council for 4 years and the Florida Intermodal Transportation Association since it’s inception. Also, the firm is well respected for it’s knowledge of sustainable community development, growth management and coastal management, all of which are directly related to Delray Beach economic, community and social development. The Character, Integrity, Reputation, Judgment, Experience and Efficiency of the Firm The CAG firm is committed to the highest levels of professionalism, commitment to client goals and reputation and successful accomplishment of the clients’ legislative and regulatory agenda. Survivability in the government relations advocacy business is directly related to the trust your clients place in you and how well you maintain that trust. The CAG has been successfully proving to clients our dependability, honesty and integrity for over 17 years, with a tremendous level of client retention, which is a testimony to what we believe is a level of outstanding service and professionalism. Our experience allows us to navigate the complicated legislative process quickly and effectively. Our cultivated relationships with top legislative leadership in both chambers and both parties allows us access to key decision-makers, accurate assessment of emerging issues, and input into final decisions on legislation, amendments and appropriations items. All of this, combined with our strategic insights into how issues trend in multiple dimensions during legislative discussions, allows us to successfully affect the changes that our clients need during this process. We are certain that our extensive institutional knowledge of the legislative and regulatory process, superb relationships with the Governor, Senior Cabinet members and Legislators, along with their strategic political acumen will prove to be invaluable during the tumultuous legislative and budget process over the next year. Knowledge of the General Character and environment of Florida Cities, including successful experience serving local governments in Florida As mentioned, CAG has represented local governments, special districts, and community public private partnerships to the Florida Legislature, Governor’s office and state agencies, including Leon County, City of North Miami, City of Key West, City of Tallahassee, and others. The firm has a first-hand understanding of local government financial and fiscal dynamics, infrastructure requirements, regulatory concerns, growth management pressures, and the unique, if not strained, working relationship that has emerged over the last several years between the legislature and local counties and cities. The CAG partners are well versed on the impact of “unfunded mandates” from the legislature, the recent fiscal pressures created by the property tax reform initiatives, as well as the unique legislative obstacles and opportunities available to City of Delray Beach. CAG has worked closely with the Florida League of Cities in pursuing their legislative agenda on behalf of all of it’s members. Because of this, we understand extremely well the concerns and culture of cities and local governments. We have attached a list of successful appropriations items for our local government clients for your review. In addition, CAG works year round, not just during legislative session, on regulatory and state agency issues for it’s local government clients to assist with their needs. This is particularly important with the level of federal funding flowing into the state through various agencies. We would assist Delray Beach in pursuing funding for projects that are either on the federal stimulus list or for which they may be eligible.  Legislative Reporting Capitol Alliance Group believes in keeping their clients informed of the latest developments with pending legislation and proposed actions by state government agencies and officials. For that reason, the members of Capitol Alliance Group use an integrated communications system to keep clients aware of all developments. To ensure success, Capitol Alliance Group holds weekly conference calls to discuss priorities, strategies and intelligence. Also, Capitol Alliance Group provides weekly legislative updates entitled “Capitol Update” to offer important legislation tracking information. These updates are provided during committee weeks and throughout the Legislative Session on every Friday by 5 p.m. This valuable piece of information allows for Capitol Alliance Group and its clients to prepare for the week ahead and reflect on the movement of legislation throughout the process. This effective tool provides enormous benefit to the client and tracking the progression of their established priorities. VII.Compensation We are providing a two tiered Fee for Service proposal. The first is for a Single Issue contract, where CAG would be hired to successfully accomplish legislative approval on one major item for the City. The second contract is for a full legislative advocacy arrangement where CAG would advocate on behalf of the City for any and all issues affecting the City.  Single Issue Contract -The all inclusive retainer fee for State Lobbying Services as identified in this proposal shall be $25,000 for eight (8) months (November 1, 2012 through July 1, 2013 – the 2013 Legislative session). The fee shall be paid in monthly installments.  Full Service Contract -The all inclusive retainer fee for Full Contract State Lobbying Services as identified in this proposal shall be $45,000 for twelve (12) months. This will include monitoring, advocating and mobilizing on all issues affecting the City. The fee shall be paid in monthly installments. References Leon County 301 S. Monroe Street, 5th Floor Tallahassee, FL. 32301 Contact Person: Vince Long, County Manager (850) 606-5300 Date of Contract: October 1, 2008 to present Capitol Alliance Group has worked with Leon County on numerous issues during this last legislative session including the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2008 (ARRA), Health and Human Services, Energy, Economic Development, Transportation, Affordable Housing and countless other priorities. During the initial Economic Stimulus discussions, Capitol Alliance Group began meeting with Agency Secretaries and the Governor to position Leon County to receive the maximum amount of funds available. Because of these important meetings, Leon County secured over $9million in Road improvement funds during the initial allocation period. Other efforts by Capitol Alliance Group on behalf of the Leon County include securing additional Down Payment Assistance Funds, Inclusion in statewide prison diversion pilot program as well as many others. City of Key West 525 Angela Street Key West, FL 33040 Contact Person: Mayor Craig Cates, (305)809-3888 Date of Contract: June 5, 2007-2012 Capitol Alliance Group is working with the City of Key West to develop strategic relationships for the development of community sustainability and affordable housing. Working with both public and private sector partners, Capitol Alliance Group has developed a short and long term housing strategy and transient rental strategies for properties owned by the City and other public and private entities. While in Tallahassee, Capitol Alliance Group is working on identifying and nurturing new affordable workforce housing opportunities for the City. Capitol Alliance Group is tireless in their efforts in Tallahassee to bring more affordable workforce housing policy that will benefit the City of Key West and others. Port of Palm Beach 1 E 11th St # 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33404-6921 Contact Person for Contract and Procurement: Manny Almira, Director (561) 842-4201 Date of Contract: July 1, 2005 Throughout the years of representing the Port of Palm Beach, Capitol Alliance Group has coordinated efforts with The Governor’s Executive Office, Office of Tourism, Trade and Economic Development, Department of Transportation, Department of Environmental Protection, The Agency for Workforce Innovation and many others. Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for identifying new business opportunities for the Port in the Legislature as well as monitor legislation that impacts the Port of Palm Beach. Capitol Alliance Group realizes the importance of international trade and tourism to Florida’s ports. With Port Canaveral located in the shadows of Kennedy Space Center, many tourists and businesses find Port Canaveral to be a prime port of call. Using industry contacts, knowledge and business development principals, Capitol Alliance Group will be able to assist City of Delray Beach in accelerating growth at Port Canaveral and the surrounding areas. Dr. Jeff Sharkey, Founder and partner in Capitol Alliance Group has also provided lobbying services for groups such as The Florida Maritime Industries Association, Florida-Caribbean Cruise Association and the Florida Ports Council. City of Destiny 101 Pugliese's Way, Suite 200 Delray Beach, FL 33444 Contact Person for Contract and Procurement: Sara Paul (888)2DESTINY Date of Contract: July 21, 2008 Capitol Alliance Group was contracted by the City of Destiny to assist in the development of an Integrated Intermodal Distribution Center for this newly created city. The City of Destiny is in development to become the first Eco-Sustainable Green City. Because of Capitol Alliance Group’s previous experience and background in intermodal transportation policy and planning, Capitol Alliance Group was chosen during a worldwide search. Working on such a large project required the firm to work closely with CSX, FEC, Department of Transportation and many other private and public entities. Along with intermodal transportation policy and planning, Capitol Alliance Group is assisting with green-company recruitment and economic development opportunities. City of Tallahassee Contact Person: Anita Favors Adams Street Tallahassee, FL 32301 Date of Contract: 1998-2005 A. Provide list of current clients, a brief description of the services provided, the term of the contract with each client, number of years each client has contracted with the firm, and the fees charged by the clients. ▪City of Key West – Capitol Alliance Group currently is working with the City of Key West to develop a strategic affordable housing plan that will provide more affordable housing options for Key West residents. Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for consulting with affordable housing stakeholders to determine need and viability of proposed projects. Also, Capitol Alliance Group is in charge of securing public and private partners for the City to assist in the creation of new affordable housing units. The City of Key West has been a client of Capitol Alliance Group since June 2006 and will remain under contract through June 2010. The fees for this contract are based on hourly work and average around $4,000 a month. ▪City of Destiny – Located off the Florida Turnpike in Osceola County, Destiny is America’s first eco-sustainable community. Capitol Alliance Group is developing a strategy for the successful creation of an Integrated Intermodal Distribution Center at Destiny. The contract extends through June 2010 with a monthly fee of $2,500. Capitol Alliance Group and Destiny began working together in July 2008. ▪Leon County -Capitol Alliance Group has represented Florida’s Capital County for the last 3 years as the County’s primary State Lobbying Firm. Working with our Federal Partners, Patton and Boggs, Capitol Alliance Group has advocated on behalf of Leon County on a wide variety of issues including economic development, affordable housing, septic tank mandates and health department services. The contract for services and fees are for $4,000 a month. ▪AT&T ▪All Saints Square – All Saints Square is a 42 unit, mixed use workforce housing development in Tallahassee Florida. In the heart of downtown Tallahassee, All Saints Square is a vital part of Tallahassee’s Gaines Street Revitalization Plan. Capitol Alliance Group is assisting All Saints Square with the Credit Underwriting portion of the Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program (CWHIP). Part of the firm’s responsibilities is educating the client on state, local and federal policies and programs incentives for workforce housing. As well as identifying state and federal financial resources and regulatory incentives to help fund the clients’ CWHIP project in Leon County. Capitol Alliance Group began work with All Saints Square in June 2008 and will continue to work with the client until credit underwriting is complete. The fees associated with this contract are $30,000 for the entire underwriting consulting. ▪Benderson Development – One of the nation’s largest privately owned development companies, Benderson Development Company currently owns and manages over 250 properties in 35 states. Their portfolio includes 29 million square feet in industrial parks, office buildings residential communities, hotels and self storage facilities. Capitol Alliance Group is currently doing affordable housing consulting for Benderson Development in 2 counties in Florida. A portion of Capitol Alliance Groups’ responsibilities include identifying and nurturing new housing opportunities for affordable workforce housing with state, federal and local housing policy makers. Capitol Alliance Group has been working with Benderson Development since June 2008 and has a contract running through December 2008. Affordable housing consulting fees for this contract are $5,000 monthly. ▪Big Bend Community Based Care – One of Florida’s Community Based Care Lead Agencies, Big Bend Community Based Care is responsible for overseeing foster care services in Florida’s Panhandle. Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for monitoring pending legislation; identifying Legislative and Executive Branch foster care child support funding. Capitol Alliance Group also provides legislative advocacy to protect and strengthen the Panhandle’s foster care agencies. The contract between Capitol Alliance Group and Big Bend Community Based Care is for 12 months, ending in March 2009. Fees associated with this contract are $3,500 monthly. ▪Capital Trust Agency – Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for monitoring affordable housing trends and state housing priorities. Other responsibilities include: meeting with the Legislature, Governor’s Office, Florida Housing Finance Corporation and other statewide affordable housing organizations to educate and advocate for support of Capital Trust Agency’s programs. Capital Trust Agency has been a client for 5 years and their contract is through December 2009. The fees for this agreement are $3,000 monthly. ▪Community Education Centers/Civigenics – Community Education Centers (CEC) is a leading provider of treatment and educational services for adult and juvenile corrections and social services populations throughout the United States. Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for assessing corrections and offender treatment funding priorities at the state level. Other responsibilities include organizing meetings with key corrections and juvenile justice policymakers, assistance in applying for the operation of one or more private correctional facilities administered by the Department of Management Services. Capitol Alliance Group has been working with CEC for over 4 years and continues to be under contract until October 2008. Monthly fees associated with this contract are $2,500. ▪Florida Intermodal Transportation Association ▪ “Go Green” Florida -Capitol Alliance Group is working with Coalition for Renewable Energy Solutions to develop the “Go Green” Florida license plate. The license plate is being developed to raise awareness in creating a sustainable environment. Funds generated from this license plate will be used to provide educational opportunities for children interested in green technologies, sustainable development and responsible living. Capitol Alliance Group is helping Coalition for Renewable Energy Solutions in the application process associated with the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. Along with the application process, Capitol Alliance Group will be finding a legislative sponsor, who will oversee the passing of the “Go Green” license plate legislation. This contract runs through May 2009 and is for $2,500 monthly. ▪HRH/GlenCairn – Capitol Alliance Group is currently working with HRH/Glencairn to assess the status of insurance and reinsurance polices and programs in the State of Florida. Additionally, Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for meeting with members of the Cabinet to discuss Property and Causality insurance and reinsurance solutions. Capitol Alliance Group will identify new business opportunities with public and private entities throughout Florida. The terms of this contract are for 12 months, ending in July 2009, with a $6,000 monthly fee. ▪Lee County Habitat For Humanity – Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for monitoring state housing issues in the legislature, Governor’s Office and Florida Housing Finance Corporation. While working with Lee County Habitat for Humanity, Capitol Alliance Group continuously has organized meetings with key housing policymakers, as well as worked to pass legislation to fully fund the Community Contribution Tax Credit program. Every month, Capitol Alliance Group provides Lee County Habitat for Humanity with a legislative update and issue report. Capitol Alliance Group has been working with Habitat for Humanity for four years and has a contract currently that runs through July 2009. Capitol Alliance Group’s fee for affordable housing consultation is $4,583 monthly. ▪Margaritaville Holdings, LLC ▪MDG/Fountain Lakes LLC. – MDG Corp. is affordable housing developer in Collier County. Capitol Alliance Group is currently assisting MDG with their Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program (CWHIP) application. MDG was recently selected for a $5 million forgivable loan to develop affordable housing in Collier County. Capitol Alliance Group is not only responsible for the submission of MDG’s application for CWHIP, but also identifying additional funding opportunities for the client’s project. The contract between the two parties is for $40,000 and is valid through the completion of the client’s project. ▪National Electrical Contractor’s Association (NECA) – Capitol Alliance Group has been working with NECA for 4 years, helping educate and advocate for electrical contractors, the building industry and other areas identified by the client. Other duties include providing accurate and timely information, intelligence feedback, and communication on developments of any legislative or agency issues. The terms of this contract is for 12 months, ending in January 2009. Capitol Alliance Group is paid $3,000 a month for services provided. ▪North Miami Community Redevelopment Authority ▪Port of Palm Beach – The Port of Palm Beach is currently in the process of developing an Inland Cargo and Freight Distribution Center. This inland Intermodal logistics hub is essential to the economic development of South Florida and the state. Capitol Alliance Group is acting as the liaison between the Port and state policymakers in order to keep the Port of Palm Beach as the lead agency associated with the Southeast Distribution Center. Other roles include: acquiring financial resources to continue strategic planning for the project, and provide a business demand and site options analysis. Capitol Alliance Group has represented the Port for 2 years and the terms of current contract run through December 2009 with a fee of $2,000 monthly. ▪Prime Homebuilders – Prime Homebuilders is one of the states largest privately owned builders, with commercial and residential properties throughout Florida. Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for the development of workforce and affordable housing strategies. Capitol Alliance Group also assisted in the submission of four (4) Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program (CWHIP) applications. Duties associated with the submission of applications include: developing strategies, creating public/private partnerships as defined under CWHIP program and developing a financing structure for the projects. Capitol Alliance Group also advises Prime of potential housing opportunities and provides a monthly report of work completed. The current contract is for 6 months and runs through January 2009, with a monthly fee of $5,000. ▪Save the Manatee Club – Capitol Alliance Group is the lead advocate for Save the Manatee Club and helps develop strategies on how to best protect the needs of the species and organization. Other responsibilities include meeting with Florida’s state policy and decision makers to help communicate the need of manatees in Florida. The services contract extends through November 2008 and monthly fees are set at $3,000. ▪SCA Properties – Capitol Alliance Group assists SCA properties by providing continued legislative and property appraiser support for tax abatement for affordable housing properties. It is also the responsibility of Capitol Alliance Group to pass legislation that will expand tax abatement for affordable housing properties owned wholly by non profit organizations. Capitol Alliance Group has been working with SCA for three years and continues to identify new workforce housing opportunities throughout the state. The current contract is for 12 months, ending in September 2008 with a monthly fee of $3,000. ▪Ticketmaster – Ticketmaster is the nation’s leading event ticket agency with offices around the world. Capitol Alliance Group assists Ticketmaster by monitoring pending legislation that directly affects the ticket industry, live entertainment and internet commerce. Capitol Alliance Group is also in charge of meeting with policymakers about Ticketmaster’s services, consumer protection and accountability. Another priority of this agreement is to identify new business opportunities with municipalities and other venues around the State of Florida. This contract is indefinite and the fees are $2,500 monthly ▪ZeroChaos – ZeroChaos is Florida’s largest contract labor solutions and vendor management firm. Capitol Alliance Group has been given the task of analyzing current policies and program for state and local governments. After the initial assessment, Capitol Alliance Group will develop recommendations on how client can meet the needs of government agencies. Capitol Alliance Group is also responsible for monitoring and advocating any legislation that would further the business goals of ZeroChaos. ZeroChaos’ current contract runs through February 2009 with a monthly fee of $4,500. Capitol Alliance Group has been working with ZeroChaos since February 2008. Affordable Workforce Housing Client Issue Outcome Professional Florida Workforce Housing Alliance 2006 -Workforce Housing Legislation and Appropriations Drafted and passed major Workforce Housing legislation (HB 1375) and budget approval for $50 million in funding for workforce housing. ($50 Million) Jeffrey Sharkey, lead lobbyist Wendover Housing Development 2008 -$5 million funding for workforce housing in Osceola County Drafted and passed budget proviso language to secure $5 million funding for workforce housing in Osceola County. ($5 Million) Jeffrey Sharkey, lead lobbyist City of Key West 2007 – Affordable Housing Regulatory relief Passage of legislation to allow local school district and community college to use surplus lands for affordable housing. Jeffrey Sharkey, lead lobbyist City of Key West 2008 – Affordable Housing Passage of Legislation allowing for addition Down Payment Assistance for municipalities who reduce or waive impact fees. Jeffrey Sharkey Transportation Client Issue Outcome Professional Port of Palm Beach 2007 -appropriation for Inland Port Intermodal Distribution Center Passage of budget proviso language for $200,000 for planning phase of Inland Port project ($200,000) Jeffrey Sharkey & Richard Pinsky, lead lobbyists Port of Palm Beach 2009 -appropriation for Inland Port Intermodal Distribution Center Passage of budget proviso language for $1,000,000 for planning phase of Inland Port Project ($1,000,000) Jeffrey Sharkey & Richard Pinsky, lead lobbyists Florida Intermodal Transportation Assoc. 2005 -FDOT Strategic Intermodal System plan Drafted and passed major transportation legislation on development of the state’s Strategic Intermodal System plan and funding formula for FDOT’s 5 year work plan. Jeffrey Sharkey, lead lobbyist Florida Airports Council 2004/05 – Florida Airport Grants funding Successful budget appropriation of $92 million (2004) and $104 million (2005) for Florida Airports grants in FDOT budget. ($196 Million) Jeffrey Sharkey, lead lobbyist Public Safety Client Issue Outcome Professional Florida Assoc of Public Safety Communication Officials (EMS) (2008) -Occupational Certification Passage of legislation creating certification standards and training requirements for dispatchers in EMS throughout Florida Richard Pinsky, lead lobbyist Land Use Management Client Issue Outcome Professional Coalition of Affordable Housing Providers 2005 – DRI Concurrency and Regulation Passage of legislative language to allow for waiver of Concurrency in DRI requirements for development of affordable housing close to major employment centers. Jeffrey Sharkey, lead lobbyist Criminal Justice/Corrections Client Issue Outcome Professional Community Education Centers/CiviGenics, 2007 -Community Corrections Passage of budget and proviso language to direct FDOC to fund 200 community based work release beds and 1264 community work camp beds ($14 Million) Jeffrey Sharkey, lead lobbyist Property Insurance Client Issue Outcome Professional Florida Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials 2007 -Property & Casualty Insurance Successful passage of legislation authorizing the creation of Self Insurance fund for Public Housing Authorities and waiver of assessment fees. Richard Pinsky, lead lobbyist Property Tax Reform Client Issue Outcome Professional Shelter Corporation 2007 -Ad Valorem taxation Successful passage of legislation authorizing property appraisers to use rental income approach revised methodology for ad valorem assessment of multifamily affordable housing. Jeffrey Sharkey, lead lobbyist City of Delray Beach -Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Ericks Consultants, Inc. [partnering with Adams St. Advocates] Contact Information: Candice Ericks @954-648-1204 or 850-224-0880 candice@ericksconsultants.com 1. Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach David Ericks, President ECI and Partner of Adams St Advocates; Candice Ericks, Consultant; Claudia Davant, Managing Partner-Adams St Advocates; and Robert Beck, Partner-Adams St Advocates. 2. List types of additional costs above the annual fee, if any (i.e. travel, printing, etc.) All inclusive, except that for extensive travel, such as with federal issues, we would request advance approval for reimbursement of travel expenses. 3. Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: YES! a. Lobby State Legislature Yes b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes c. Lobby local and other agencies (i.e. Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). Yes, the entire team can lobby those and other agencies with the exception of Candice Ericks who cannot lobby Palm Beach County. d. Meet regularly with City elected officials and/or staff (i.e., inperson, conference call, etc.) Yes e. Develop City’s state legislative agenda Yes f. Provide weekly legislative updates during session Yes g. Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes 4. Does your firm provide federal lobbying services? If so, please describe. We have strong relationships at the federal level and have assisted our clients with federal issues. a. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, please describe the type of assistance that may be available. Many issues that we deal with at a state level are contingent on various Federal components. For example, we have worked for years collectively with clients such as Broward County, Palm Beach County, other cities, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority and JM Family on issues that require federal cooperation to succeed on a state or local level. We have worked on transportation issues with Congressman Mica from Florida [Chairman], Congressman Shuster of Pennsylvania [next Chairman] and Subcommittee Chair Congressman Sam Graves of Missouri. As most of the Florida Congressional Delegation began their political careers in the Florida Legislature, we have already worked with them for years at the state level. We have also worked closely with the Administration for Children & Families’ Assistant Secretary, George Sheldon, who served as the Secretary of the Florida Department of Children & Family Services before leaving for DC. b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partners with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. We have relationships with various firms and would help the city team with whichever firm would be most effective depending on the specific issue being addressed. 5. Provide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session, and provide a summary of the final result. Crime Lab Funding Crime lab funding was a priority for the Broward County Sheriff’s Office and Broward County for the last few years. Florida has five crime labs located in Broward, Palm Beach, Miami-Dade, Indian River and Pinellas Counties that were underfunded by the state. Prior to the 2012 legislative session, statutory authority allowed but did not require judges to impose an additional penalty to increase the funding for crime labs when they were used in the successful prosecution of a defendant. Invoking this additional fine was rarely imposed and it was not uniformly applied. This created significant shortfalls that the Sheriff’s office and the County then had to subsidize with local funding. Efforts led by ECI throughout 2010 and 2011 culminated in successful changes to mandate crime lab fees in 2012 legislation. Specifically, language was passed that would require a $100 fee to be mandated when a person was convicted of a crime and the local crime lab was utilized. Through ECI’s strong relationships with the Broward delegation, support for the language to change the statute was garnered early in the process. This support resulted in Senator Bogdanoff (who was essential in previous efforts) committing to making it a priority during Budget negotiations. ECI worked tirelessly throughout the appropriations process attending all Budget meetings and worked alongside Senator Bogdanoff to gain the support of both the House and Senate leadership to secure the House acceptance of the mandatory $100 fee language. We were successful in getting the House to accept the language and Senate Conforming Bill 1968 passed both the House and Senate unanimously. Our understanding is that this language will provide an estimated $5 Million funding for the crime labs. However, our work was not finished at Session’s end. During the veto period we worked diligently with the Governor’s Office to answer questions and educate them on the user fee funding source contained in the legislation. Our arguments were persuasive and the bill was ultimately approved by the Governor. Medical Examiners During the 2011 Legislative Session ECI facilitated a meeting with the Director of Government Relations for the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, regarding allowing our medical examiners to be given direct access to the DAVID database [Driver & Vehicle Information Database] for the purpose of determining the identification of a deceased individual. This database contains a motorist’s identifying and emergency contact information. The agency was concerned about the number of examiners who would be allowed to gain access. We had multiple meetings that resulted in the DHSMV signing off on agreed upon language that would limit the access points to the database as well as including an inter local agreement. Unfortunately, time was an issue and we agreed with the sponsor to wait until the following year to pursue the change. With the groundwork already set we started the 2012 Session touching base with DHSMV to make sure the Department was still supportive of our efforts. After being given the green light and we immediately met with the House sponsor, Representative Albritton and his staff, to explain why Medical Examiners should have direct access to the DAVID database. He understood our concerns but also made it clear that only language that was agreed on by both sponsors (House and Senate) would make it into the final cut of the legislative package. We had our marching orders and went directly to Senator Latvala's office and met with his staff to explain at length the need we saw for direct access to the database and why we should be included in the legislation. From that point we were on constant follow-up with both offices up until the strike-all amendment was made public. Our language ultimately passed allowing the state’s Medical Examiners access to this much needed identification tool. Both of these bills are examples of our sustained, successful efforts on behalf of our clients. ERICKS CONSULTANTS, INC. Governmental Consulting City of Delray Beach Submitted 10/11/2012 205 South Adams Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 850-224-0880 -1 -Introduction ............................................................................................................................... -2 -Expertise and Experience ......................... ................................................................................... -7 -Appropriations ................................................................................................ ............................ -9 -Federal ....................................................................................................................................... -9 -Execution .................................................................................................................................. -10 -Some Examples of Successes .................................... ................................................................ -12 -Price Proposal .................................................................................................................. ......... -20 -Closing ...................................................................................................................................... -20 -Appendix 1 – ECI Client List ....................................................................................................... -21 -Appendix II – Professional References ............................................... ....................................... -28 - -2 -It is with great pleasure that Ericks Consultants, Inc. (ECI) teaming with Adams St. Advocates (ASA), submits the following proposal to represent the City of Delray Beach on matters of governmental affairs before the Florida Legislature, Cabinet and executive branch agencies, as well as assisting on Federal matters. Our experience provides us with a keen understanding of the issues that local governments face as well as an understanding of new initiatives that the City will undertake. With vast experience representing local governments, we understand that legislative representation is critical to your success. We as a team offer unparalleled knowledge and experience in the political process, gained from years of direct participation. Through experience, dedication, knowledge of the political process and strong relationships, ECI is a highly effective full-service governmental consulting firm representing both corporate and public entity clients with legislative and state agency issues. Equipped with an in-depth knowledge of Florida government, we are trained to interact with all state and local agencies, legislative committees and executive staff. ECI has joined forces with ASA to form an extremely strong alliance in the political arena to meet the City of Delray Beach’s current and future goals. David Ericks has been a government consultant since 1980. Candice Ericks joined the firm in 1998. Marty Cassini joined as general counsel 2009. Since its founding in 1985, Ericks Consultants, Inc. has represented some of Florida’s top corporations and largest associations and has secured a place in Florida’s political arena at both the state, county and municipal levels of government. ECI has offices one block from the Capitol in downtown Tallahassee and in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. ASA is a Florida-based consulting firm, established in response to today’s fluid economic and political landscapes. ASA is a forward thinking, client centered group that provides extensive management experience in both the private and public sectors. ASA is passionate about helping clients reach their goals through a collaborative effort, all the while remaining focused on their needs from beginning to end. Simply, Adams Street Advocates, as the name implies, are advocates-willing and ready to be part of a team that will champion the City of Delray Beach’s priorities. While recently formed -its team members, as discussed in more detail later in this proposal, have a long history at all levels in state and local government. Together they are a collective force committed to excellence and will work endlessly to achieve the results not only the City desires, but deserves. We have extensive knowledge and expertise in dealing with our South Florida Environment, specifically transportation, energy, public safety, solid waste, growth management, beach renourishment, rail, airports, seaports and tourism. We currently represent the City of Coconut Creek [almost 6 years] the City of Coral Springs [12 years] the City of North Lauderdale [since 2009 and previously represented], the City of Pembroke Pines [for over 6 years], the Town of Davie [cumulatively almost 6 years], the City of Plantation [more than 7 years] and recently the City of Fort Lauderdale. We have represented the Cities of Hollywood and Pembroke Park in the past. We also represent Broward County [over 15 years] and Palm Beach County [over 6 years]. We believe that the experience gained from representing these local governments provides us the capability and understanding to meet the needs of the City of Delray Beach. Please meet the members of Ericks Consultants, Inc. (ECI) -3 -DAVID ERICKS is founder and President of Ericks Consultants, Inc. Dave moved to Fort Lauderdale when he was 13 years old and graduated from Stranahan High School. After returning from College at C.W. Post (Long Island University) on a football scholarship he took a position as a police officer with the City of Plantation, which transitioned him into the world of Florida politics. Dave Ericks has been a registered lobbyist in the State of Florida for almost 30 years, starting with his representation of the State of Florida Fraternal Order of Police while at the City of Plantation Police Department in 1980. Mr. Ericks was a registered lobbyist for the Broward County Sheriff’s Department, the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles and the 3M Corporation before founding Ericks Consultants, Inc. in 1985. Prior to establishing his own firm, Mr. Ericks was employed by the 3M Corporation as Regional Administrator and Registered Lobbyist in Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama. Mr. Ericks served as Senior Executive Assistant to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Administrative Assistant to the Broward County Sheriff and served on the City of Plantation Police Force. Mr. Ericks’ past experience allowed him the opportunity to work with various police and criminal justice organizations, including the Steering Committee for Constitutional Amendments and the State Law Enforcement Job Task Advisory Committee for the Florida Police Standards and Training Commission. He has also represented members statewide as the President of the Fraternal Order of Police. His service in those positions has given him both law enforcement and administrative expertise at the local, county and state levels. Moreover, since establishing Ericks Consultants in 1985, Mr. Ericks has represented a multi-faceted group of clients, giving him a wide array of expertise in multiple subject areas, including the electric and telecommunication utilities, law enforcement, entertainment, healthcare, travel, corrections, solid waste, growth management, automobile, gaming, and transportation industries; as well as in the many diverse issues which face local governments on a day to day basis. Dave is a pioneer member of the Florida Association of Professional Lobbyists. Dave served as Chairman of the Tallahassee Downtown Improvement Authority for 3 years and currently serves on the Board. He presently serves on the Advisory Board of Keiser University’s Tallahassee Campus and previously served as a Board Member of the Florida State Fair Authority. Dave received his B.A. Degree from Long Island University and earned his Master of Science Degree in Criminal Justice from Nova University. He is also a graduate of the F.B.I. Academy’s Law Specialist School in Quantico, Virginia and has taught as an Adjunct Faculty Member for Nova University. Mr. Ericks resides in Tallahassee, Florida. CANDICE ERICKS is a consultant with Ericks Consultants, Inc., based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Candice was born in Broward County and grew up in the City of Plantation. Prior to joining the firm 14 years ago, Candice began her career in corporate sales in New York City, specializing in outdoor advertising and temporary staffing. Upon her return from Manhattan in 1998, Candice opened the Fort Lauderdale branch of Ericks Consultants, Inc. Candice has developed an extensive network of contacts and relationships within state and local governments and the business community and works closely with the firm’s South Florida based clients. Due to her work with an extensive array of clients, Candice has developed broad expertise in numerous subject areas. Candice is active in many charitable organizations and serves as a Board Member of ChildNet, a not-forprofit organization working to protect Broward County's abused, neglected and abandoned children; the Florida Association of Professional Lobbyists (term ending January 2010), an organization committed to establishing and maintaining high standards for the lobbying profession; and Broward Days, an -4 -independent, nonprofit and nonpartisan group of people advocating for diverse needs and concerns of Broward County, Florida. Candice was a member of Leadership Broward’s Class of XXV, an organization that seeks to prepare members for leadership roles in their community. Candice was also recently featured by Gold Coast Magazine as one of Broward County’s leading young professionals [40 Under 40] who were recognized for their professional and civic involvement in Broward County. Candice worked with Ericks Consultants, Inc. while attending Florida State University and interned during the 1994 Legislative Session in the Florida Senate. She graduated with a Public Relations and Political Science degree from Florida State University. Candice Ericks resides in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. MARTY CASSINI was born in Miami and subsequently raised in Miami Shores. He attended Miami Country Day School for most of his young life and then went on to Barry University. While at Barry, Marty earned a Bachelor of Science in Sociology with a minor in History and also played on the Men’s Soccer team. After college, Marty moved to Alpharetta, Georgia. He worked for the well-respected real estate firm McCalla Raymer. During his time there, Marty administered many real estate transactions and gained a deep love for the law and moved back to South Florida to attend Nova Southeastern Law School. In 2006, Marty graduated from Nova and immediately became policy adviser and legal counsel to the Florida Senate Minority Leader. With such an opportunity, Marty acquired an in depth knowledge base of many different subject matters, including local government, gaming, insurance, health care, transportation and tax issues. Marty worked with various stakeholders on a variety of subjects. Most notably, he was involved in the property insurance rewrite of 2007, gaming bills that expanded poker rooms and slots machines at parimutuels, stem cell research investments, Sun Rail, removal of the affordable housing fund cap, the property tax rollback and ad valorem assessment changes, voluntary condominium termination, and high occupancy vehicle travel for hybrid cars. Since 2009, Marty has collaborated with Ericks Consultants Inc. on an array of different issues but concentrates mainly on local government, tax and gaming issues. With his legal and policy background, Marty is the analytical arm of the firm, providing detailed and in-depth reviews of all legislation moving through the process. He drafts bills and amendments and he also creates comprehensive policy initiatives. Marty offers insight and guidance on how policy changes affect the firm's clients. Marty is also a practicing attorney in the areas of corporate, business and finance law as well as local government law. Marty has served as counsel for campaigns, political action committees and other political groups. Marty serves as pro bono counsel to a local developmentally disabled school and has also lobbied pro bono for Autism related initiatives. Marty has also served as in-house counsel for campaigns, political action committees and other political groups. JANET MORRIS is the Office Manager for Ericks Consultants and works out of the Tallahassee office. Janet has an in-depth knowledge of the operation of the Florida Legislature and state government. Janet -5 -retired from the Florida House of Representatives in 2006 as a Senior Legislative Analyst in the Committee on Business Regulation. In her capacity on committee staff, Janet was responsible for the analysis of legislation dealing with alcohol, tobacco, general business and all gaming venues [lottery, pari-mutuels, slots, etc.]. Prior to her service on the Business Regulation Committee staff, Janet served as an Executive Assistant to the Speaker of the House and Majority Leader. Please meet your team from Adams St. Advocates (ASA) DAVID ERICKS is one of the founding partners of Adams St. Advocates. In addition to Dave, other founding partners that will be dedicated to your issues include Claudia Davant, Robert Beck and Tanya Jackson. CLAUDIA DAVANT, Managing Partner, was the former Managing Partner of NSI, Florida where she lead the national firm's Florida practice for almost 4 years. While there she built a broad multi-client practice that included information technology, local government, telecommunications, transportation, gaming, appropriations, healthcare, aging, education, environmental issues with a niche practice around procurement driven clients and sales/business development strategy. She has extensive experience in government and private sectors. Prior to NSI, Claudia was on the national business development team for Accenture, a global information technology firm, where she led sales campaigns for large, complex integrated systems opportunities. At Accenture she was also responsible for government relations in Florida as well as many other states and worked closely with government entities at both the state and local level in that role. Claudia moved to Florida in 2000 as AT&T's State President for Regulatory and Legislative Affairs where she worked hand in hand with key decision makers in both the Florida legislative and executive branches for 5 years. She subsequently was promoted to Regional Vice President for Legislative Affairs for AT&T where she successfully led legislative and regulatory reform campaigns in the Southern Region before the merger with BellSouth. In addition to her corporate experience, Claudia worked in government on both the state and federal levels. She served as U.S. Senator Strom Thurmond’s Legislative Aide in Washington, D.C. for 3 years providing legislative analysis, constituent service and external communications. As a Policy Advisor to the Michigan House of Representatives, she led the staff effort to rewrite the Michigan Telecommunications Act. And as General Counsel and Communications Director for the South Carolina Department of Commerce, she negotiated economic development incentives with corporations wanting to do business with the state. Claudia currently serves on the Associated Industries of Florida (AIF) IT Council, Florida TaxWatch Board’s Executive Steering Committee and Board, the Take Stock in Children Board and the Florida Afterschool Network Board. One of only nine recipients nationwide, she was recently honored by the Afterschool Alliance as Florida’s Afterschool Champion of the Year at the “Breakfast of Champions” in Washington, DC. A South Carolina native, Claudia earned her BA from the University of South Carolina Honors College and Law degree from the University of South Carolina. ROBERT BECK brings unique and invaluable skills in public and private sector budgeting and appropriations, assisting our clients to build effective business cases that resonate with government decision-makers and procurement evaluation teams. Having served in senior roles in government -6 -including Staff Director of Senate Appropriations, Budget Director for the Governor of the State of Florida, Policy Advisor to the Senate President on Appropriations, Medicaid, and General Government, Robert has leveraged his extensive public sector experience to position private sector clients to effectively compete and win multiple agency procurements since reentering the private sector in 2008. Robert’s experience in health care, criminal justice, and extensive experience with Medicaid has allowed him to effectively assist his clients in developing value propositions and procurement opportunities that resonate in today’s fiscally challenging environment where agencies are continually confronted with a growing workload and shrinking resources to meet these demands. Robert effectively leverages his executive branch relationships, having served in the Departments of Elder Affairs, Children & Families, Agriculture, Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, and Management Services to create opportunities and interest by state agency stakeholders through effective communication and knowledge of agency needs. Robert understands the importance of effective business cases and sound return on investment analyses in a state government market that is becoming more and more driven to operate like a business, increase efficiency and reduce costs. Robert leverages his deep relationships in government and combines these relationships with solid business skills to create opportunities and encourage state government stakeholders to pursue them as good public policy. JIM HENRY has been involved with state government for over forty years. The last ten years he was with The Department of Children & Families as Legislative Director – most recently for Secretary Wilkins. There he coordinated the full legislative package including budget and all substantive program areas. He also served on the department’s executive leadership team. Before that he was legislative coordinator for The Florida Lottery for four years under then Governor Jeb Bush. Jim also was the executive director and lobbyist for The Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers. He came to Tallahassee in 1971 and stared to work as staff director in the Florida legislature both in the Senate and House of Representatives. This unique alliance between ECI and ASA offers the City of Delray Beach a proven, dedicated and respected South Florida based team, as well as a seasoned Tallahassee based team that works and lives in Tallahassee year round. Combining the intimate knowledge of the South Florida based team with the Tallahassee year round presence is invaluable and critical to the City. Many committee, administrative and rule making hearings and other important meetings take place outside of the legislative calendar. Having the ECI/ASA dual representation allows for firsthand knowledge and insight into what is happening throughout the year and the direct effects it may have on the City. In these tough economic times the regulatory and administrative process is equally important as the legislative process. Environmental permitting issues, economic development incentives and the process of determining the economic impact of unfounded mandates are just a few examples of issues that agencies address throughout the year. We are aware of the importance of economic incentives to the City of Delray Beach and our team has solid relationships with the Department of Economic Opportunity, as well as Appropriations in both the House and the Senate. -7 -Our experience and knowledge, combined with our strong relationships throughout the Legislature, allows us to cover a lot of ground within the legislative process. Our capabilities are supported by inhouse legal counsel and interns, as well as an extremely seasoned Office Manager with 30 years of experience in the legislative process. We pride ourselves on efficient coordination and organization that allows us to handle numerous tasks for multiple clients simultaneously. We believe that our long-term relationships with the majority of our clients are indicative of our past performance. In addition, ASA brings another team to the table to champion the City of Delray Beach’s efforts, with additional experts in the consulting and lobbying fields. Session moves fast and decisions and legislation changes quickly so having a large team at the capitol every day and living in Tallahassee during session is invaluable to your representation and success. Another advantage to having a team that lives in Tallahassee during Session is that travel has become so costly and difficult many members of the Legislature and staff spend their weekends in Tallahassee which provides additional opportunities to spend time with decision makers while the decisions are actually happening. Our approach will be an informed and educated one. Our relationships with leadership in both the House and the Senate afford us the knowledge of what the Legislature will be focused on and an insight into what their challenges will be. We will proactively develop a strategy to successfully integrate the City’s needs into the overall plan for the Legislature’s plan. As soon as priorities are identified we will immediately secure bill sponsors for general or special legislation if needed, in addition to educating our local delegation. ECI has a reputation for working within the legal and ethical guidelines of the political world. Experience and personal relationships give us the ability to organize strong political support for our clients’ issues, opposition to amendments that are disadvantageous to our clients, and sponsorship of legislation that is vital to our client’s agenda. Reputation, access, and expertise is the strength of the ECI/ASA Team. ECI is uniquely situated by having a Tallahassee-based firm with an extremely active South Florida office, both equipped to respond to clients’ needs. This dual presence allows constant visibility in both the southern and northern regions of the state. Our firm is fortunate to have very good relationships with both sides of the political aisle, which allows ECI to represent our clients in a highly effective manner. Term limits have made it such that there is no longer an off season from the legislative session. We at ECI spend the entire year in close contact with Legislators and their staff regarding interim projects, campaigns and possible legislation for the upcoming year. In addition, we continue to focus on leadership in both chambers, and of course, the strength of our tri-county delegations. We believe that being present at all times when decision makers and their staff are physically at the capital is vital to your representation. Knowing that ECI “lives” at the Capitol during the legislative session is to the city’s benefit. We believe that our most effective resources are those relationships that we have formed over the years. We take pride in the fact that we have outstanding professional and personal relationships with Legislators from both parties and their staffs, the Governor’s office, with Cabinet officers and staff, and with key decision makers in state agencies. In fact, during a recent team planning meeting the ECI/ASA team went through the organizational charts of every executive branch agency and determined that we have good relationships and access to every agency! This access will be invaluable to the City for any and every issue that needs to be addressed. The Florida Association of Professional Lobbyists [FAPL] was created to provide on-going training and professional development and is committed to promoting the highest ethical standards of professional -8 -conduct among its membership. David Ericks is a pioneer member of the Association and Candice Ericks has served on its Board of Directors for several years and has recently been reappointed. ECI values its professional reputation and has spent years cultivating trust-based relationships within Palm Beach County and state government. ECI has a strong relationship with each member of the Palm Beach County Delegation and staff. We are confident that each current member of the Delegation is comfortable working with ECI. With elections around the corner and qualifying over we are now spending our time getting to know all of the candidates that may become new members of the Delegation. We historically attend the annual Florida League of Cities and Florida Association of Counties statewide and legislative conferences. ECI is also a member of Florida Association of Intergovernmental Relations (FAIR). Being a member of this group affords us the opportunity to utilize an additional resource. During Session this group meets twice a week to discuss and strategize on all Legislation that will affect your City, whether it be transportation, growth management, public safety etc. We have been a member of this group for many years and through this we have cultivated many working relationships and close ties between different levels of government. This participation enhances our knowledge and understanding of the challenges and trends that face South Florida cities, as well as municipalities across the state. We work particularly close with the Florida League of Cities and Association of Counties during the Legislative Session. It is especially beneficial to the citizens of the City of Delray Beach that ECI and ASA have enduring relationships with House and Senate leadership. As you know, the Legislature and the Governor’s office is led by an overwhelming majority if Republicans and we maintain strong relationships with the Majority Party in Tallahassee at both the Legislative and Executive Branch levels. Only a couple of committee chairman and leadership roles have been announced for the new Senate President Gaetz or incoming House Speaker Weatherford. However, we are confident that based on our current relationships we will be well positioned regardless of which members will be appointed to key positions. For the ones who have been announced, such as the House Appropriations Chairman and the Senate Pro Tem, we have very good trust based relationships with those members. Currently we have solid relationships with the Incoming Senate President and Speaker, as well as their recently announced Chiefs of Staff. As for South Florida, we are well positioned with the Senate Minority Leader Chris Smith and House Minority Leader Perry Thurston. Both Senator Smith and Representative Thurston have worked closely with ECI throughout the years. While the Governor’s office is currently transitioning to a new Chief of Staff, we have close relationships with key deputies as well as decision makers and key influencers in the Governor’s Office of Policy and Budget (OPB). Our ability to represent our clients is reflected in the duration and loyalty of our business relationships throughout the State of Florida. ECI has a history of familiarizing themselves and forming strong, professional relationships with the members of city and county commissions, the Florida Legislature, cabinet offices, state agencies and staff. ECI has the proven ability to recognize the changing trends in the corporate and political worlds and uses those skills to organize, monitor, maneuver and communicate between government and client, giving both the comfort of understanding and the ability to offer compromise. -9 -Our team is also actively engaged in Associated Industries of Florida (AIF) and other business related lobbying organizations so that we understand what the business priorities are for the Legislative Session and how they will impact the City of Delray Beach. Being successful in the Appropriations process today requires an effective strategy that builds a compelling business case to support your appropriations request. Our team will work with you to build effective business cases needed to support your appropriations issues. The competition for state funding has been nothing but fierce for the past 6 years due to Florida’s revenue challenges – for six years in a row, state revenue collections have been insufficient to fund base budget expenditures. The need to develop a high-level ‘return on investment’ analysis to support your appropriation’s priorities will also be key and we will work with your team to develop the business case needed to support your appropriations priorities. As your advocate and consultant in Tallahassee and back at home in South Florida, our focus will be on our communication, knowledge, expertise, ability and relationships to assist the City of Delray Beach with current priorities, as well as planning and laying the ground work for future goals. We understand the needs and challenges that local governments face on a daily basis and the challenges of planning in tough economic times. Our goal in supporting and advocating on behalf of the City of Delray Beach’s appropriations priorities will always be to present a strategic, compelling, and focused message that differentiates and positions your appropriations requests. ECI has in depth knowledge of the state appropriations process and has been successful in obtaining line item appropriations for our clients. However, the addition of Robert Beck to our roster brings an extraordinary insight and experience to the ECI Team. Robert is uniquely qualified in the legislative appropriations arena having been an appropriations staff director for the Florida Senate. In addition, Beck held the role of chief policy advisor on appropriations for the Florida Senate President in 2004 and 2005. In addition to his legislative appropriations experience, Beck has held senior executive appointments in budget leadership acting as the Governor’s budget director under Governor Crist and also holding the budget director jobs for other executive branch agencies. Beck brings the most solid experience in state budgeting and legislative appropriations possible to achieve this client’s goals. Beck provides a level of knowledge to the appropriations process which has helped him to achieve results in multiple policy areas including health care-specifically home and community care for seniors, Medicaid, criminal justice, technology, education and transportation. Our team will provide continuous assistance throughout the budget process, advocating for full-funding of the City’s project requests. Please note that Mr. Beck with ASA has extensive knowledge of the Florida budget process and has proven to work successfully within the extremely complicated appropriations world. In addition, we will also identify relevant funding opportunities and assist with grant requests. Keep in mind that many opportunities come up outside of the timeframe of the regularly scheduled Session and having a full-time extended team living in Tallahassee continuing to work at the Capitol is key. Members of our team will continue to work throughout the year with the Florida League of Cities and the Palm Beach League of Cities to review their policies. We will also maintain follow-up and appreciation correspondence throughout the process when appropriate. -10 -Please be aware that out team has very strong relationships at the Federal level. In addition, many issues that we deal with at a state level are contingent on the Federal components. We have worked for years collectively with clients such as Broward County, Palm Beach County, other cities, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority and JM Family on issues that require federal cooperation to succeed on a state or local level. We are very familiar with coordinating efforts with our Congressional Delegation, as well as other members from around the state to achieve the desired goals. As most of the Florida Congressional Delegation came from the Florida Legislature, we have worked with them for years. For example, we have worked on transportation issues with Congressman Mica from Florida [Chairman], Congressman Shuster of Pennsylvania [next Chairman] and Subcommittee Chair Congressman Sam Graves of Missouri. We have also worked closely with the Administration for Children & Families’ Assistant Secretary, George Sheldon, who served as the Secretary of the Florida Department of Children & Family Services before leaving for DC. Areas of representation for the City of Delray Beach, will include but will not be limited to: transient or vacation rental issues; community residential group homes [sober homes]; economic opportunities; financial incentives; energy; beach nourishment; transportation; communications services tax; pensions; and local preemptions. We are familiar with the transient rental issue and the history of the legislation that was passed. Our team has excellent working relationships with all parties involved including Senator Evers and representatives of the Vacation Rental Managers’ Association. From our recent conversations we understand the challenges regarding this issue but believe that we can be an effective advocate for the City’s position. It is important to point out that, especially regarding to the sober homes issue, our team has an extremely close trust-based relationship with the Department of Children and Family Services, the Florida League of Cities, and the discussed potential sponsors in the House and Senate. We plan to collaborate our efforts on the city’s behalf with both the Palm Beach League of Cities and the Florida League of Cities who are making this the top priority for this legislative session. ECI, along with ASA, will provide unparalleled representation to the City of Delray Beach. We will work closely with the Mayor, Vice-Mayor, Deputy Vice-Mayor, Commissioners, City Manager and staff in the coordination and development of the annual legislative agenda and appropriations requests, including holding workshops as necessary. Once the agenda and budget priorities are set we will then identify key legislators, as well as staff in the Governor’s Office, the Cabinet and executive branch agencies regarding our specific legislative and budget priorities. We will then continue to develop and implement strategy on proposed special or general legislation in coordination with the Palm Beach County Legislative Delegation. Our team will be involved in drafting and analyzing proposed legislation, developing strategies and recommending amendments as necessary. ECI will create white papers, talking points or other educational documents to distribute to members as needed on important issues. We will arrange initial educational/informational meetings amongst staff and members of the Legislature and executive branch agencies and will facilitate follow-up meetings as the priorities move through the legislative session. Members of our team will continuously track legislation throughout Committee weeks and Session, monitoring all state legislative committee meetings and agency hearings prior to, during and after Session and testifying as needed. -11 -Our approach will be an informed and educated one. ECI is a committed consulting/lobbying firm that acts as an extended arm of our clients in every aspect. Whether it is on a state, local or federal issue, ECI works closely with each client to identify their specific needs. We recognize that each client has unique assets and needs and has their own style for achievement reports and distribution of workload. Many of our clients are team-based; therefore, the responsibilities, as well as the efforts, are shared. In other cases, we are a client’s sole representation. Members of our firm will be available at all times via phone, text, fax, or email to maintain vital lines of communication throughout Legislative Committee weeks and Session. One of our strengths is the ability to take large amounts of information and present it to the City of Delray Beach every committee week or week during session. With two attorneys on the ECI/ASA team bills and policy changes are given very thorough analyses and reviews. You will receive informative and concise reports on policy matters that will detail any negative or positive effects from any particular piece of legislation. We have staff dedicated to bill tracking and reporting, updates, legislative intent, and answering any questions you may have. ECI believes that communication is the most valuable component of a client/lobbyist relationship and is the key to their mutual success. Insight and ongoing communication between the lobbyist and the client provides a better understanding of exactly what the client wants, allowing us to be successful in achieving the desired result. ECI will provide written reports and updates on a regular basis, during both the legislative session and the interim, on those issues and concerns identified by the City. During Session, the City will receive official weekly reports, as well as phone calls and emails during the week as needed. In these weekly reports the City will receive updates on the City’s priorities, other legislation that City should be aware of, the overall political climate, anticipated action for the upcoming week and a suggested action plan if needed. In addition, ECI will continuously apprise the City of developing initiatives of which we believe the City should be aware, and will submit a status report on priority issues one week prior to the end of Session. At the close of Session, ECI will submit a priority report and soon after a thorough end-of-session report on specific legislation and new requirements effecting the City. Also note that should there be a specific issue that needs detailed research, we have done and will do that for our clients. We will provide that privileged information to decide on the best strategic approach with options. For example; what cities, businesses, and other legislatures are doing in other states on a particular issue. After session we would like to come to the City to talk about what transpired. Prior to the start of Interim Committee Meetings, we would like to conduct a workshop with the Mayor, Vice-Mayor, Deputy Vice-Mayor, Commissioners, City Manager and staff to discuss what has happened in the interim and what we should expect to see in the upcoming session. This will lead us into developing the Legislative Agenda for the year to come. Our team takes pride in the fact that we are in constant communication with our clients, whether it be at community events, through reports and correspondence or by phone. Although the hustle and bustle of Tallahassee calms down when session is over, we know that the City will constantly have issues with proposed bills, rule-making, administrative bodies, court cases and perhaps even issues between the state and federal government. Administrative agencies routinely promulgate new and revised rules/regulations. Ericks Consultants, Inc. and Adams St. Advocates constantly monitors the development of these proposes rules which are developed via a formal “rules hearing process” under Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. During these rule workshops, we work with the State to ensure our client’s interests are not unduly burdened by a newly proposed/revised rule. During the course of rule promulgation, we analyze the proposed policies for client impact – from a legal, -12 -operational, and fiscal impact – and provide public testimony during the rule-making process to shape the final outcome. South Florida Regional Transportation Authority For historic background, almost ten years ago ECI was instrumental in helping to pass legislation which transformed the Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority (TriRail) into the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA.) The new Authority was created with a vision to provide greater mobility in South Florida, thereby improving the economic viability and quality of life of the community, region and state. The ECI Team was instrumental in the passage of major legislation that gave the Authority the power to issue, reissue or redeem bonds. Through ECI’s efforts, the bill provided for discretionary bonding ability and gave the Authority the potential to receive matching funds of at least $45 million if Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties imposed a local-option funding source. This provision guaranteed that a dedicated funding source, either from the state, counties and/or a local-option funding source, was always available to the Authority. Throughout 2008 and 2009, ECI worked with the SFRTA team to educate the legislature and other key executive agency decision makers on the critical need for additional dedicated funding. In December 2009, the Florida Legislative Special Session culminated in successfully gaining Legislative approval for additional funding; specifically, the Legislature appropriated an additional $15 million a year for five years to close the gap needed to run a full complement of 50 trains which directly benefits not just the counties but also the City of Ft. Lauderdale. This funding was critical to the on-going operation of the rail and picks up the shortfall caused by reduced funding from the county. The Team successfully secured an additional $1 million in funding during the 2010 Legislative Session. With a state budget short fall of over $4 Billion, any increase in funding was a monumental accomplishment. During the 2012 Legislative Session, Legislation was introduced to dramatically change the governance of the SFRTA Board based on recommendations by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). It would have eliminated the three local representatives currently on the Board and provided for the ability to completely privatize the agency. After weeks of intense lobbying, a compromise was negotiated between SFRTA , FDOT and the Governor’s office to preserve the local representation and allow the Governor additional representation without jeopardizing SFRTA’s operating authority. This amendment required a complicated legislative strategy that was successfully implemented in multiple committee meetings on multiple legislative vehicles, floor support and passage. Ultimately, HB 599 was signed by the Governor and ECI is proud of the teamwork between SFRTA, Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach. This huge undertaking that affected multiple counties clearly demonstrates ECI’s leadership abilities to lead on complicated political and policy issues directly affecting local government. JM Family Enterprises -13 -Historically, ECI has fought franchise legislation that would be harmful to the operation of JM Family Enterprises (Southeast Toyota). In the automobile industry, JM is unique in the sense that although they are a distributor, they also own a dealership. JM Family has a wonderful business relationship with its dealers, however, when it comes to franchise legislation JM normally takes the manufacturer stance. Overall, ECI has been successful in defeating franchise language or in negotiating legislation that is less injurious to JM Family. For example, during the 2009 legislative session there was a push to enact legislation that would have made it virtually impossible for a dealer to ever relocate. The language would also have nullified a provision requiring a franchisee to maintain and honor facility improvements that were in place through an already negotiated franchise agreement. ECI was successful in stripping the offensive language out of the bill on the last day of Session. Energy With the assistance of Senator Bogdanoff and Representative Moraitis, we were successful in amending both the House and Senate versions of the Energy Legislation (HB 7117) to include the words "commercial property". Adding this language expanded the ability of local governments to partner with commercial properties to further energy efficient projects which benefits local business and improves energy consumption. The energy legislation is an initiative, backed by the Commissioner of Agriculture, which would extend $16 million dollars of tax credits for renewable energy. The bill also makes a number of changes to energy laws to streamline and help implement a renewable energy plan state-wide. In addition to expanding the ability for biofuel permits the bill allows utilities to recover costs from consumers if the PSC makes such a determination after petition. Additionally, there is information on vehicle charging stations and privately owned electric charging on both energy consumption and the impact of the electric grid on the state. We mention some details of this bill because energy will continue to be a focus of future legislation and we know how important it is to the City of Delray Beach regarding vehicle charging and fueling stations, as well as green energy initiatives. There was recently a workshop in Tallahassee that ECI attended specifically on electric vehicle charging and the electrical grid. We expect a rule-making workshop soon probably in Central Florida to deal with these issues, where we will be in attendance. Seaports During the 2010 Legislative Session ECI and the coalition of Florida Seaports gained support for significant changes to port regulations. HB 963 by Representative Ray and SB 2000 by Senator Ring was Port Policy/Regulatory Relief legislation dealing specifically with the following: port conceptual permits, stormwater management systems serving overwater piers, reduction of match for rehabilitation of wharves and piers, flexibility language for FSTED program, funding process, dredging permits issued by DEP, public/private partnership authority, as well as providing an expedited process for the submission of work program amendments for seaport projects. ECI attended all committee meetings, as well as numerous meetings with the sponsors, other legislator and staff to ensure its passage. In 2011, ECI helped pass HB 283 by Representative Young/SB 524 by Senator Latvala. Florida at that time was the only state subject to both state and federal seaport requirements, including duplicative background checks and access cards. This of course put the state and specifically Port Everglades at a competitive disadvantage with other ports, as well as being costly to port users and workers. HB 283 repealed these duplicative regulations and was signed into law by Governor Scott at a special bill signing -14 -ceremony. (This legislation settled the differences of the FDLE card and the TWIC (Transportation Worker ID Card). Please note that this was an ongoing battle since 2009 and we are very proud of passage of this legislation. In 2011 ECI was instrumental in working with the Ports Council to help pass language geared toward environmental processes, permitting language and seaport planning language. (Senator Ring and Representative Ray – HB 399) This legislation is beneficial to Port Everglades because of the maintenance dredging and streamline permitting language. In 2012, specific port funding for the SouthPort Turning Notch was eliminated from FDOT’s five year work plan. ECI strategically led a coalition of business leaders from Broward County that included Port Everglades Board Members, members of the Greater Fort Lauderdale Business Alliance and Broward County Commissioners. We then facilitated critical meetings with key legislators and agency decision makers to reinstate that funding in the appropriations process. ECI was instrumental in working along side the Ports Council to help pass monumental seaport legislation. Increased financial assistance, as well as streamline permitting legislation was put into place to benefit Florida’s 14 seaports. We worked hard to secure additional money for the FSTED Program, as well as setting up a Strategic Port Initiative to benefit the future of Florida’s ports. Our efforts resulted in an increase from the previous year and specific appropriations for Port Everglades are as follows: Port Everglades $1,100,000 for the Southport Turning Notch (project funded through FSTED Port Everglades $12,000,000 for Southport ICTF on Port Rail Improvement (project funded through FDOT) Port Everglades $12,214,668 for Southport Turning Notch Expansion (project funded through FDOT) FEC/Port Everglades ICTF $30,000,000 (project funded in the Intermodal line item) Crime Lab Crime lab funding has been a priority for the Broward County Sheriff’s Office and Broward County for the last few years. Florida has five crime labs that are underfunded by the state. Prior to the 2012 legislative session, statutory authority allowed but did not require judges to impose an additional penalty to increase the funding for crime labs when they were used in the successful prosecution of a defendant. Invoking this additional fine was rarely imposed and it was not uniformly applied. This created significant shortfalls that the Sheriff’s office and the County then had to subsidize with local funding. Efforts led by ECI throughout 2010 and 2011 culminated in successful changes to mandate crime lab fees in 2012 legislation. Specifically, language was passed that would require a $100 fee to be mandated when a person was convicted of a crime and the local crime lab was utilized. There are 5 local crime labs that are located in Broward, Palm Beach, Miami-Dade, Indian River and Pinellas Counties. Through ECI’s strong relationships with the Broward delegation, support for the language to change the statute was garnered early in the process. This support resulted in Senator Bogdanoff (who was essential in previous efforts) committing to making it a priority during Budget negotiations. ECI worked -15 -tirelessly throughout the appropriations process attending all Budget meetings and worked along side Senator Bogdanoff to gain support of both the House and Senate leadership to secure the House acceptance of the mandatory $100 fee language. We were successful in getting the House to accept the language and Senate Conforming Bill 1968 passed both the House and Senate unanimously. Our understanding is that this language will provide an estimated $5 Million funding for the crime labs. During the veto period we worked diligently with the Governor’s Office to answer questions and educate them on the user fee funding source contained in the legislation. Our arguments were persuasive and the bill was ultimately approved by the Governor. Afterschool Programs During the 2012 Legislative Session Claudia Davant helped lead the charge to prevent the passage of legislative changes that would have made 32,000 low-income children ineligible for participation in the afterschool programs they were currently enrolled in. She met with legislators and facilitated language supported by the Florida AfterSchool Network and other advocates for children and education so that the legislation that was ultimately passed met their goals for improving children’s school readiness without blocking access to important afterschool programs. Claudia was named Florida’s “Afterschool Champion of the Year” for her successful pro bono work on behalf of the Florida Afterschool Network. Budget Robert Beck, a founding partner with Adams St. Advocates leads our Firm’s Appropriations work. Robert has a solid understanding of the State of Florida’s budget process having held numerous senior appointments in the Executive branch, the Governor’s Office and in the Senate Legislative Appropriations Committee. Since leaving government in 2008 after 22 years, Robert has helped secure millions of dollars in appropriations increases as well as preserves base budget funding on behalf of his clients. These accomplishments include: • FY 2010-2011 – Preserved funding for home and community-based programs serving seniors in while over $4 Billion was cut from programs in the State Budget. During the worse fiscal times the State of Florida has ever faced, Mr. Beck was able to secure several million dollars to increase Florida’s Aging & Disabled Medicaid Waiver program. • FY 2011-2012 -$40 million increase for home and community based care programs for seniors including for Alzheimer’s Projects & Services; Nursing home diversion program, Community Care for the Elderly, and local service programs serving Broward and Miami-Dade Counties. • FY 2012-2013 $ 23 million increase for home and community based care programs for seniors $ 11.4 million for the AIDS Insurance Continuation Programs which serves Broward County $ 2.5 million increase for AIDS Drug Assistance Program $ 4.4 million for Juvenile delinquency prevention programs $ 1.0 million of the Health Council of South Florida In addition to these recent appropriations secured through Mr. Beck’s advocacy efforts, he also was an integral member of the 2012 Team led by Ericks Consultants to protect the SFRTA’s base budget funding for commuter rail transportation and secured $2 million for rail bridge replacement in Central Florida. Finally, Mr. Beck has helped his clients achieve success in the budgeting process in numerous cases -16 -through the development of State Budget Proviso language and development of numerous budget conforming bills critical to ensuring proper implementation of the budget following legislative session. Charter Schools ECI was instrumental in obtaining increases in appropriations each year for charter schools. We represent the City of Coral Springs and the City of Pembroke Pines on charter school issues. This has been an uphill battle over the years to gain support and appropriations for the charter school effort. 2001 -Increased from $20 million to $27.7 million 2006 -Increased from $27.7 million to $53 million During the 2007 and 2008 Legislative Sessions -over $54,000,000 2010 -$56,112,466 2011 -$55 million appropriated with additional money for high performing charter school systems (note that both Coral Springs and Pembroke Pines are part of a high performing charter schools system) 2012 -$55,209,106 (plus additional funding available after allocation to the lab schools) Broward Center for the Performing Arts In 2012, ECI was successful in helping pass a bill for the Broward Center of the Performing Arts. The bill grants a public record exemption for publicly owned and operated performing arts centers. Before the bill passed confidential, sensitive, and personal information of the centers’ donors were subject to public records requests. The bill was signed by the Governor and donors are now protected. Crimes Against The Homeless This effort was attempted for many years, prior to passage in 2010. HB 11 by Representative Porth and SB 506 by Senator Ring, added homelessness into the statute of Hate Crimes (reclassifying offenses evidencing prejudice based on the homeless status of the victim). Florida leads the nation in attacks on the homeless. After Maryland enacted a law based on some of the horrific incidences that we as a community faced here in Broward, Sheriff Lamberti contacted members of our Delegation to pursue this effort yet one more time. ECI worked with the sponsors, Commander Rick Wierzbicki and Broward staff through every committee meeting and numerous discussions with Legislators in both the Senate and the House to ensure passage of this legislation. Although it did not pass unanimously [25 yeas/10 nays], there was virtually no discussion on the floor when Senator Ring presented the bill to the Senate. However, some members of the House were quite vocal in their opposition to adding another Hate Crime to the statute that already included nine classes. Representative Porth gave a passionate argument and defense of the legislation. Ultimately, the vote was not close [80 yeas/28 nays] and HB 11 passed. Medical Examiner During the 2011 Legislative Session ECI facilitated a meeting with Steven Fielder, Director of Government Relations for the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, regarding allowing our medical examiners to be given direct access to the DAVID database [Driver & Vehicle Information Database]. This database contains a motorist’s identifying and emergency contact information, for the purpose of determining the identification of a deceased individual. Fielder was concerned about the number of examiners’ ability to gain access. Through a lengthy discussion we agreed upon a number of roughly 20 (as the number across the state) that, pursuant to an interagency agreement, would have -17 -secure access to the database. Once DHSMV signed off on the agreed upon language we went back to Representative Moraitis who we had briefed prior to our meeting with DHSMV. With the groundwork already set we started the 2012 Session touching base with Steven Fielder to make sure the Department was still supportive of our efforts. He gave us the green light and we immediately met with Representative Albritton and his staff to explain why our Medical Examiners should have direct access to the DAVID database. He understood, but also made it clear that only language that was agreed on by both sponsors (House and Senate) would make it into the final cut of the legislative package. We had our marching orders and went directly to Senator Latvala's office and met with his staff to explain at length the need we saw for direct access to the database and why we should be included in the legislation. From that point we were on constant follow-up with both offices up until the strike-all legislation was made public. We were very pleased that the database language was incorporated. Palm Beach County In 2011 ECI was instrumental in securing language in the reorganizational legislation for enterprise zone boundary designations on behalf of Palm Beach County. Also, we were able to secure $1.4 million in the budget during the Conference process for the Glades Senior Center/West County Homeless Resource Center. Although the $1.4 M passed in the budget, this particular item, along with many other items, was subject to Governor Scott’s veto power. Property Appraiser Issues ECI worked with Senator Ring and Representative Holder to pass SB 1580 -partial property payments. This piece of legislation proved to be more difficult than we expected. There were many hurdles; however, with the help and dedication of Senator Ring, Representative Holder, Representative Bogdanoff and Representative Murzin, among others, we were able to get it through both chambers in the last few days of Session. What SB 1580 ultimately does is allows for taxpayers to pay their property taxes in partial payments. Before passage of this legislation the law did not legally allow the tax collector to collect the payment unless it was paid in full. This piece of legislation will be helpful to the Florida citizens in these difficult economic times. Seminole Compact After years of negotiation, the Seminole Tribe of Florida and the State finally came together on a compact. The agreement comes after the Legislature challenged the first compact in 2008 and rejected compacts in 2009. The compact will allow the state to collect at least a billion dollars over five years. The Seminole Tribe is authorized to conduct gaming at the following locations: Seminole Indian Casino – Brighton, located in Okeechobee, FL, Seminole Indian Casino – Coconut Creek, located in Coconut Creek, FL, Seminole Indian Casino – Hollywood, located in Hollywood, FL, Seminole Indian Casino – Immokalee, located in Immokalee, FL, Seminole Indian Casino – Big Cypress, located in Clewiston, FL, Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino – Hollywood, located in Hollywood, FL, and Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino – Tampa, located in Tampa, FL. -18 -As a part of the Revenue Sharing Agreement between the state and local governments, the State will remit 3% of revenue received from the Tribe. Out of this 3%, Broward County shall receive 22.5% for revenue collected from the Seminole Indian Casino-Coconut Creek facility, and 25% for both Seminole Indian Casino in Hollywood and the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Hollywood. (The share is less for Coconut Creek due to more cities being included in the share than for the Hollywood facilities.) ECI was successful in negotiating a 5% fee to affected cities and counties in the original Governor’s compact that was overturned by the courts. ECI then helped negotiate the eventually agreed upon 3% (down from 5% because the legislative compact was requiring a larger guarantee from the Seminoles in the final agreement) on the legislative compact. ECI was instrumental in ensuring the percentage cuts to Broward County and the City of Coconut Creek. Law Enforcement ECI was responsible for numerous pieces of legislation dealing with all areas of public safety. SB 214 which set the statewide standards for the training and use of dart firing stun guns. SB 428 which raised the per diem rates for travel expenses of public employees. HB 251 which created the Marvin Clayton Act, which is the database to fairly and correctly dispense the allocation for local law 175/185 premium tax revenues. HB 295 which increased the penalties for violators that attempted to flee or elude law enforcement officers. HB 749 the Duval County Sheriff’s office pension plan legislation added correctional officers to special risk of their local law plan. SB 1792 which revised the number of members sitting on the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission and added the 180 day tolling or limitation period of actions against a law enforcement officer. HB 123 law enforcement officers’ bill of rights, that stopped the 180 day tolling of an investigation during a declared state of emergency and clarified that law enforcement officers were entitled to be interviewed last during an investigation. HB 143 set state wide training standards for firearms training, bringing Florida in line with Federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act. Local Governments In 2008, ECI was able to obtain $500,000 for the Fire Training Simulator Tower for the City of Coral Springs. In 2008, Claudia Davant was retained to help the City of Tavares secure funding from the FDOT for the development of commuter rail in Tavares. In addition to rail funding, Davant’s team helped the City with various permitting issues related to the redevelopment of downtown Tavares. The Department of Environmental Protection had been unwilling to grant the City approval for the reconstruction of an overwater pavilion on Lake Dora. The Davant Team worked with state and local officials, as well as the Legislature and Governor’s office, to get approval for the project. The City was not only granted all permits for construction, but the permits were expedited, saving the City over 12 months of project delays. ECI was responsible for obtaining $7 M for the Plantation Preserve Golf Course. CBIRS -Back when community budget requests were part of the budget, ECI was extremely knowledgeable and successful in securing them for our local governments. Florida Atlantic University -19 -ECI worked with Tom Barlow, Director of Governmental Relations for Florida Atlantic University, to secure funds for identified FAU programs. ECI was initially hired to work on the FAU Davie Campus expansion. During the time ECI represented the University we exceeded our assigned goal and were instrumental in securing substantial funding for the university. In 2007, $94 million in PECO funding, $4.3 million recurring for their medical school expanding as 4 year program; $18 million for a new engineering project; $10 million for a general classroom building; $18 million for the Davie campus expansion; $8 million for the Harbor Branch Oceanic Research Center; and, an $500,000 increase for a student-teacher program. During the 2008 Legislative Session, ECI successfully secured the final $4.3 appropriation for the medical school as well as $8.75 million for an ocean to energy project, $52 million in PECO funding, $9 million in student projects, and $5 million for the Wellness Center. Local Preemption Experience Local preemption language is a constant battle in Tallahassee in numerous areas and we fight all session long for our local governments. Some examples of our experiences in this area include: Growth Management In 2009 ECI worked with Representative Schenk’s office to place a conforming amendment on HB 73 regarding contracting with the Department of Environmental Protection. The language extends the ability to expedite permitting to charter counties with population over 1.2 million that have delegation agreements with DEP or WMD if they do so by resolution. (This bill was amended and passed.) Solid Waste In 2010, ECI worked closely with local governments and other interested parties to defeat preemptive language that would have ultimately dissolved solid waste franchise agreements between a city or county and a vendor. That language would have changed the definition of Construction and Demolition debris and would have put an end to previously negotiated and operating contracts. The last time there was a real attempt to change this language was about five years ago. We were also instrumental in defeating that initiative at that time. Recycling SB 570 by Senator Constantine was quite contentious during the entire 2010 Session. ECI worked with all interested parties to ensure that unachievable mandates to local governments and private business were not in the final piece of legislation. From the beginning we felt comfortable with holding unfriendly language at bay in the House, knowing that we had a fight on our hands in the Senate. The House introduced their language as part of a committee sponsored bill [HB 7243] under Representative Williams’ direction. As the next few weeks unfolded, through countless discussions, amendments and negotiations, we were successful in ensuring that acceptable language was included in the legislation. Taxi Cabs ECI has fought against and has always been successful in defeating pre-emptive language regarding taxi cab regulation for many years. The proposed language prohibits state and local governments from regulating the transfers of taxi cab licenses or shares in the corporation that owns those licenses. The -20 -language usually shows up within the last few weeks of Session. In 2009 it was filed as an amendment to SB 424 and onto HB 1021. In 2010 the language showed up during the last 2 weeks filed as an amendment onto HB 1271. The 2011 Session was a bit different. The legislation was drawn only to affect Hillsborough County. We met with the sponsor to ensure it would not affect Broward. Last year there was not an appetite to entertain the efforts although there was discussion. Traffic Enforcement Cameras ECI worked on and helped pass House Bill 325 that formalizes and governs the specifications for the red light cameras across the state. The bill allows local governments to contract with private contractors to install red light cameras at intersections. The bill provides that any red light infraction will result in a fine of $158. If the county or municipality operates the camera, then the local government will retain $75. If the state operates the cameras, then the local government will receive $45. Under both scenarios, $10 will go to the Department of Health Administrative Trust Fund and $3 will go into the Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Trust Fund. During the 2012 Legislative Session there was legislation introduced and an attempt to repeal the red light camera law. HB 4087 by Representative Corcoran passed the House but was never taken up in the Senate. Since the Senate did not consider the repeal, the sponsor offered amendments to other transportation bills. One particular amendment seemed to gather support toward the end of the Session and may be back next year. The amendment would have required traffic studies to show that red light cameras would in fact make intersections safer. Other amendments that were debated included the prohibition on citations for red light right hand turns and enactment of specific yellow timing standards. ECI worked alongside interested parties against this effort for our cities, Palm Beach County and ACS. We do expect to see this issue in the 2013 Legislative Session. Ericks Consultants, Inc., together with Adams St. Advocates, would be pleased to accept this one year contract for lobbying services for the City of Delray Beach for an annual fee of $40,000, payable in twelve monthly installments. This contract includes but is not limited to scheduled, extended and special legislative sessions as well as other times throughout the year deemed necessary by the City or the Consultant. The ECI/ASA team would like the opportunity to partner with the City of Delray Beach. We want to thank the City for the opportunity to present this unique and exciting strategic alliance that will allow the City to enter the 2013 Legislative Session with confidence and trust. Should you have any questions or need additional information on any part of this proposal, please do not hesitate to ask. Thank you. -21 -– The following Client List offers insight into the varied nature of our experience and current endeavors and provides contact information for each of our clients. American Ambulance Service, Inc. Charles Maymon 2570 South Park Road Pembroke Park, FL 33009 954-868-6668 cmaymon@AmericanAmbulanceSvc.com ECI began representing American Ambulance before local governments in 2010. American Marketing & Management, Inc. Austin Forman 888 SE 3rd Avenue, Suite 501 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 954-522-1969 af01@bellsouth.net ECI has represented American Marketing for more than 12 years. BAGS, Inc. Craig Mateer 6751 Forum Drive, Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32821 407-447-5547 craig@airportbags.com ECI resumed representing BAGS, Inc. in Broward County in 2011. Broward Center for the Performing Arts Kelley Shanley 201 SW 5th Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312-7112 954-522-5334 kshanley@browardcenter.org ECI has represented the Center for over 12 years. Broward County Eddie Labrador 115 South Andrews Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-357-7575 elabrador@broward.org -22 -ECI has represented Broward County for more than 14 years. Broward County Property Appraiser Lori Parrish 115 South Andrews Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-357-6904 lori@bcpa.net ECI has represented the Broward County Property Appraiser for over five years. Broward County Sheriff’s Office Sheriff Al Lamberti 2601 West Broward Boulevard Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312 954-321-4605 allamberti1@aol.com ECI has represented the Broward Sheriff’s Office for over three years. Broward Health (formerly North Broward Hospital District) Charlotte Mather 303 SW 17th Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 954-355-4174 charlotte.mather@nbhd.org ECI has represented Broward Health for over seven years. Cash Bond Online Pat McDonough 1750 Archmont Circle Dacula, GA 30019 888-726-6301 pmcdonough@cashbondonline.com ECI began representing Cash Bond Online in 2011. Center Stage Attractions Joe Gehl 1815 Cordova Road, Suite 211 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33315 954-522-4146 jgehl912@aol.com ECI has represented the Gehl Group for over 20 years. -23 -City of Coconut Creek David Rivera 4800 West Copans Road Coconut Creek, FL 33063 954-973-6720 drivera@coconutcreek.net ECI has represented City of Coconut Creek for almost six years. City of Coral Springs Erdal Donmez 9551 West Sample Road Coral Springs, FL 33065 954-344-1142 edonmez@coralsprings.org ECI has represented City of Coral Springs for over eight years. City of Fort Lauderdale Lee Feldman 100 N. Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-828-5364 lfeldman@fortlauderdale.gov ECI began representing the City of Fort Lauderdale in October 2012. City of North Lauderdale Ambreen Bhatty 701 SW 71st Avenue North Lauderdale, FL 33068 954-724-7041 abhatty@nlauderdale.org ECI resumed representing the City of North Lauderdale again in 2009. City of Pembroke Pines Mayor Frank Ortis Charlie Dodge 10100 Pines Boulevard Pembroke Pines, FL 33026 954-431-4884 cdodge@ppines.com ECI has represented the City of Pembroke Pines for at least six years. City of Plantation -24 -Mayor Diane Veltri Bendekovic 400 NW 73rd Avenue Plantation, FL 33317 954-797-2227 mayor@plantation.org ECI has represented City of Plantation for over seven years. Diplomat Properties Limited Partners, LLC Francis X. Lilly 3555 South Ocean Drive Hollywood, FL 33019 202-898-2270 flilly@independentfiduciary.com ECI began representation of this world class resort and spa in 2011. Federation of Public Employees AFL-CIO Dan Reynolds 1700 NW 66th Avenue Suite 100 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33313 954-797-7575 x 221 taflaco@aol.com ECI has represented the FOPE since 2009. Florida Power and Light Company Paul Hamilton 215 South Monroe Street, Ste 810 Tallahassee, FL 32301 850-521-3915 paul_hamilton@fpl.com ECI has represented FP&L for over 13 years. Florida Sunshine Entertainment Association Angelina Spencer 4340 Beechwood Lake Drive Naples, FL 34112 216-965-7527 angelina001@comcast.net ECI has represented the Association since 2007. Fort Lauderdale Swap Shop Preston Henn 3501 West Sunrise Boulevard -25 -Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33311 954-931-8148 swshop@aol.com ECI has represented the Swap Shop for over 20 years. The GEO Group, Inc. George Zoley Jorge Dominicis One Park Place, Suite 700 621 Northwest 53rd Street Boca Raton, FL 33487 561-999-7326 gzoley@geogroup.com jdominicis@geocareinc.com Gerstle, Rosen & Goldenberg, PA Ron Nadler 2630 NE 203rd Street Aventura, FL 33180 305-937-0116 rnadler@gerstlerosen.com ECI began representing the Gerstle CPA firm in September 2012. Herzog Contracting Norm Jester Post Office Box 1089 St. Joseph, MO 64502 954-970-3970 njester@herzogcompanies.com ECI has represented Herzog for over 14 years. JM Family Enterprises Sonya Deen 100 NW 12th Avenue Deerfield Beach, FL 33443 954-429-2404 sonya.deen@jmfamily.c om ECI has represented JM for over 16 years. Kendall Properties & Investments Austin Forman Bill Murphy 4300 North University Drive, Suite D-103 Lauderhill, FL33351 -26 -954-522-1969 af01@bellsouth.net ECI has represented Kendall Properties for over seven years. Palm Beach County Todd Bonlarron 301 North Olive Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-310-7832 tbonlarr@co.palm-beach.fl.us ECI has represented Palm Beach County for over eight years. Seminole County Sheriff’s Office Sheriff Donald F. Eslinger Chief Peggy Fleming 100 Bush Blvd. Sanford, FL 32773 407-665-6650 pfleming@seminolesheriff.org ECI began representing the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office on October 1, 2012. South Florida Regional Transportation Authority Joe Giulietti 800 NW 33rd Street, Suite 100 Pompano Beach, FL33064 954-788-7918 giuliettij@sfrta.gov ECI has represented SFRTA for over 17 years. Tindall Hammock Irrigation and Soil Conservation District Austin Forman 888 SE 3rd Avenue, Suite 501 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 954-522-1969 af01@bellsouth.net ECI has represented Tindall Hammock for over seven years. Town of Davie Richard J. Lemack 6591 Orange Drive Davie, FL 33314 954-797-1023 richard_lemack@davie-fl.gov -27 -ECI resumed representing the Town of Davie in 2010. United Healthcare of Florida Tom Moore 3100 SW 14th Avenue Miramar, FL 33027 813-890-4531 thomas_w_moore@uhc.com ECI began representation of UHC in 2010. United Pawnbrokers Group Thomas E. Sams 4527 Arnold Avenue Naples, FL 34104 239-825-0714 tomsams@capitalpawn.com ECI has worked with the United Pawnbrokers Group or members of the pawnbroker community since 2003. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. Russell Mackie 2101 W SR 84 Longwood, FL 32779 305-651-7011 rmackie@wasteprousa.com ECI began representing Waste Pro in 2011. -28 -– Ericks Consultants is pleased to present the following professional references: Company Name: American Marketing & Management Address: 888 SE 3rd Avenue, Suite 501, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 Contact Name: Austin Forman Telephone: 954-763-8111 E-Mail Address: af01@ammi.net Fax: 954-522-1969 ECI has represented this client since 2000 Company Name: South Florida Regional Transportation Authority Address: 800 NW 33rd Street, Suite 100, Pompano Beach, FL 33064 Contact Name: Vicki Wooldridge or Joe Giulietti Telephone: 954-788-7934 E-Mail Address: wooldridgev@sfrta.fl.g ov Fax: 954-786-7505 ECI has represented this client since 1995 Company Name: Broward Health Address: 303 SW 17th Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 Contact Name: Charlotte Mather Telephone: 954-355-4174 E-Mail Address: charlotte.mather@nbhd.org Fax: 954-355-4774 ECI has represented this client since 2005 Company Name: Broward County Sheriff’s Office Address: 2601 West Broward Blvd, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312 Contact Name:Al Lamberti or Danielle DiNicola Telephone: 954-321-4605 E-Mail Address: danielle_dinicola@sheriff.org Fax: 954-763-4917 ECI has represented this client since 2009 Company Name: JM Family Enterprises Address: 100 NW 12th Avenue, Deerfield Beach, FL 33443 Contact Name: Sonya Deen Telephone: 954-429-2404 E-Mail Address: sonya.deen@jmfamily. com Fax: 954-429-2677 ECI has represented this client since 1996 Company Name: Broward County Property Appraiser Address: 115 South Andrews Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Contact Name: Lori Parrish Telephone: 954-357-6904 E-Mail Address: lori@bcpa.net Fax: 954-357-8474 ECI has represented this client since 2006 Company Name: City of Plantation Address: 400 NW 73rd Avenue, Plantation, FL 33317 Contact Name: Mayor Diane Veltri Bendekovic Telephone: 954-797-2222 E-Mail Address: mayor@plantation.org Fax: 954-797-2223 ECI has represented this client since 2005 -29 -Company Name: City of Coral Springs Address: 9551 West Sample Road, Coral Springs, FL 33065 Contact Name: Erdal Donmez Telephone: 954-344-5906 E-Mail Address: edonmez@coralsprings.org Fax: 954-344-1043 ECI has represented this client since 2000 Adams St. Advocates LLC is a Florida Limited Liability Company established in 2011. Our office hours are Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 5:00 PM; however, we are always available to our clients via cell phone, text message or email. ASA has two Tallahassee offices and also works from the ECI office in Fort Lauderdale. We encourage you to visit our website at: www.adamsstadvocates.com for more information on our firm. Professional Reference for Claudia Davant: Company Name: Xerox State & Local Solutions, Inc. Address: 2073 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 300, Tallahassee, FL 32317 Contact Name: Chuck Cliburn Telephone: 850-210-1302 E-Mail Address: chuck.cliburn@acs-inc.com When was your contract awarded: 2008 Professional Reference for Robert Beck: Company Name: Aging & Disability Resource Center of Broward County Address: 5300 N. Hiatus Road, Sunrise, FL 33351-8701 Contact Name: Edith Lederberg Telephone: 954-745-9603 E-Mail Address: lederbee@adrchbroward.org Fax: 954-745-9584 When was your contract awarded: 2008 City of Delray Beach -Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Florida Strategic Group Contact Information: David A. Shepp 1. Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach 2 David Shepp – Consultant Alex Cutts – Administrative Assistant 2. List types of additional costs above the annual fee, if any (i.e. travel, printing, etc.) None 3. Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: X = Yes a. Lobby State Legislature X b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies X c. Lobby local and other agencies (i.e. Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). X – as necessary d. Meet regularly with City elected officials and/or staff (i.e., inperson, conference call, etc.) X e. Develop City’s state legislative agenda X f. Provide weekly legislative updates during session X g. Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Executive Branch and State Agencies X 4. Does your firm provide federal lobbying services? If so, please describe. Yes. We currently provide federal consulting for the City of Lakeland and can develop a similar program for the City of Delray Beach. a. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, please describe the type of assistance that may be available. n/a b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partners with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. 5. Provide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session, and provide a summary of the final result. 1. HB 615, by Rep. Horner – create a ‘blacklist’ for retailers who refuse to pay wholesale distributors as well as classifying roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco stores as ‘manufacturers’. The bill stalled at the end of Session, but we were able to amend the retailer/distributor issue on to HB 887 by Rep. Ingram. The bill was signed by Governor Scott and went into law on Oct 1, 2012. The RYO provision was removed, but later passed by Congress and signed by the President. 2. HB 4025, by Rep. O’Toole – elimination of local business taxes. Fought the proposal to repeal F.S. Chapter 205, the “Local Business Tax” statute, which would have eliminated local business licenses and the resulting revenues. Worked with members of the House Finance & Tax Committee to prepare questions during the Committee Workshop to discredit the bill and keep it from reaching a vote. The bill was TP’d and did not advance beyond the Committee. City of Delray Beach -Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Greenberg Traurig Contact Information: Leslie Dughi, Assistant Director of Government Affairs, 850-521-8571; cell 850-519-3903 1. Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach Hayden Dempsey, Chair, Florida Governmental Affairs Practice Leslie Dughi, Assistant Director of Government Affairs Note: There are five lobbying professionals on our team. While these two professionals will be primary for Delray Beach, to ensure the highest level of representation is provided, the other team members stand ready to assist. GT also has 2 full-time legislative services professionals that provide support for all legislative needs. 2. List types of additional costs above the annual fee, if any (i.e. travel, printing, etc.) Expenses in addition to the annual fee would include travel (primarily for face to face meetings with Delray Beach staff and Commissioners which may also be done through conference calls). We expect to keep these additional costs to a minimum. Further, we typically include in our proposals that any expenses over a certain amount be subject to the client’s written approval. 3. Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: a. Lobby State Legislature Yes b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes c. Lobby local and other agencies (i.e. Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). Our proposed contract would focus on lobbying on the state level for Delray Beach. However, our team and other members of Greenberg Traurig have strong working relationships with local agencies. In particular, our South Florida professionals have experience working with Palm Beach County policymakers and the South Florida Water Management District. Further, in Florida and in DC, we have professionals with extensive expertise working with the US Army Corps and the Corps of Engineers. d. Meet regularly with City elected officials and/or staff (i.e., inperson, conference call, etc.) Yes – Regular meetings will ensure we provide the highest level of representation for the City. We are willing to meet with staff and Commissioners in the manner (in person or by conference call) that best suits Delray Beach. e. Develop City’s state legislative agenda Yes – It is imperative that the lobbying team gains an in-depth understanding of the issues important to Delray Beach. Development of a legislative agenda should be a collaborative effort between Delray Beach leaders and the lobby team. f. Provide weekly legislative updates during session Yes. During session, legislative language can change quickly. It is important that close contact is maintained with the Commissioners and staff to ensure we are appropriately advocating your position. g. Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes 4. Does your firm provide federal lobbying services? If so, please describe. Yes. Our DC Governmental Affairs team has successfully provided legislative representation and lobbying at the federal level for a number of municipal clients. Our team has achieved fiscal and policy successes on behalf of our municipal clients, securing more than $250 million in funding over the past decade. These funds have been instrumental in a variety of economic development, housing, infrastructure, environmental, homeland security, and community-related programs. a. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, please describe the type of assistance that may be available. N/A b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partners with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. N/A 5. Provide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session, and provide a summary of the final result. Our team, for more than 20 years, has been involved in major legislative initiatives on varied policy and appropriation issues. We are happy to provide you with an extensive list of issues we have worked on over the last several years. Outlined below are a few of the issues we worked on for our clients. Local Business Taxes – On behalf of a municipality, we worked to change language originally proposed by Rep. O’Toole which would have prohibited any increases in local business tax rates beginning in FY 2012-13. Working closely with Rep. Roberson, the language that ultimately passed exempted individuals licensed and operating as a real estate sales or broker associate from paying a local business tax. The bill also provided an option for certain counties and municipalities to continue levying local business taxes, provided that at least 25% of their local tax revenue in local FY 2012-13 comes from local business taxes. Counties and municipalities opting to continue levying local business tax would not have been able to increase their ad valorem millage rates above those levied in local FY 2012-13, unless they discontinue levying their local business tax. Further, the bill provided that certain counties and municipalities that pledged their local business tax revenue stream as security for bonds or certificates issued before March 9, 2012, could have continued to levy their tax to meet obligations required by the bonds or certificates. Septic Tanks -On behalf of a local municipality, we worked with Rep. Dorworth and others on HB 999 (which ultimately was added to HB 1263 by Rep. Hudson). This bill repealed the statewide onsite septic system evaluation program and required a county or municipality with a first magnitude spring to develop and adopt by local ordinance a septic system evaluation and assessment program, unless the county or municipality opts out. All other counties and municipalities may opt in. Further, existing septic system inspection programs are grandfathered in unless they contain a mandatory inspection at the point of sale in a real estate transaction. The bill also ensured that owners are given at least 60 days’ notice that their system is due for an evaluation. Finally, the bill required DEP to notify a municipality of potential funding under the Clean Water Act or Clean Water State Revolving Fund and assist such counties or municipalities to model and establish low-interest loan programs. Failure to Return Vehicles -On behalf of an international rental vehicle company, we successfully drafted and passed proactive legislation (HB 729 by Rep. Pilon) that ensured stolen vehicles would be added to the law enforcement "hot sheet" to ensure quick retrieval of the vehicle. The bill also increased, for an evidentiary standpoint, the weight given to the evidence that the person in possession of the vehicle received the demand for return notice from the company and failed to return the vehicle. Medicaid Reform -Over the last three legislative sessions, on behalf of a national health care organization and a statewide business association, we played a significant role in the 2011 comprehensive rewrite of the state's Medicaid program. We worked very closely with legislative leadership and the Governor's office to craft and implement this landmark legislation. Our work continued in the 2012 session as implementation of the reform began and as changes were proposed. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com ©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved. GT Overview of Greenberg Traurig’s Proposal for State Lobbying Services Presented to City of Delray Beach, Florida October 12, 2012 Contact: Leslie Y. Dughi Assistant Director, Governmental Affairs Greenberg Traurig, P.A. dughil@gtlaw.com Direct: 850.521.8571 101 East College Avenue Tallahassee, FL 32301 GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. | ATTORNEYS AT LAW | WWW.GTLAW.COM Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 1 GT Table of Contents Section Page About Greenberg Traurig’s Tallahassee Office 2 Qualifications and Experience 3 Representative State Experience 4 Greenberg Traurig’s Team for Delray Beach 7 Legislative Support Services 9 Proposed Fee Schedule and Expenses 10 Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 2 GT About Greenberg Traurig’s Tallahassee Office Greenberg Traurig’s Tallahassee office is home to a multidisciplinary legal team with deep Florida roots. For more than 20 years, our lawyers and governmental affairs professionals have worked at the intersection of business, government and the law. We provide our clients with a wide range of practical legal counsel and services, from dispute resolution and transactional representation to governmental advocacy and day-to-day corporate advice. Located just one block from the state’s capitol and legislative buildings, and three blocks from Florida’s Supreme Court, GT’s Tallahassee office gives our clients an immediate physical and political link to the heart of the nation’s fourth largest state. Greenberg Traurig merged with the Tallahassee office of Roberts, Baggett, LaFace & Richard in 1992 with approximately 14 lawyers who maintained a successful practice for over 15 years. The union provided GT with not only the strong state governmental presence that RBL&R had but the ability to expand this presence statewide. The fruit of these years has been not only strong relationships with governmental and elected officials, but also deeply-rooted relationships with the staff of these officials — whose longevity, many times, exceeds the terms of their bosses. We have clients across the entire political spectrum. Our practice includes banking, local government, procurement, campaigns and elections, data security and privacy, economic incentives, energy, environmental, financial services, gaming, growth management, health care, housing, insurance, public relations and media strategy, state appropriations, taxation, telecommunications, and transportation. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 3 GT Qualifications and Experience The Florida Governmental Affairs team at Greenberg Traurig has been in the mix of every major legislative battle for the past 18 years. We’ve worked to develop and pass such notable legislation as the creation of the Dade County Expressway Authority, Florida's Catastrophic Hurricane Fund, Workers’ Compensation Reform, Nursing Home ‘Tort Reform’ Legislation, the 1995 Telecommunications Act, Privacy and HIPPA Implementation Legislation, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB Act) Implementation Legislation, the first state definition of ‘Green Energy,’ Rate Rebalancing Legislation, and Florida’s Unified Building Code. We have annually navigated the appropriations process to obtain funding for municipalities and numerous other clients. We’ve helped maintain markets for Florida’s independent power producers and developed new markets for Florida’s life, health, and auto insurers. Each legislative session, the GT Tallahassee Governmental Affairs Team advocates for clients seeking state funding for a variety of programs and projects. Annually our team defends current substantive policy and seeks to amend it on behalf of our clients. Moreover, we are involved in the development of yearly appropriation requests, including the drafting of substantive legislation with both statewide and local fiscal impact. We determine the appropriate sponsors, research and develop oral and written materials to support the issue, and intricately follow each movement through the House and Senate. On appropriation projects, as negotiations progress through the end of the session, we rely on our strong relationships with House and Senate leadership, appropriations leadership and staff to ensure that our clients’ requests survive the maze of House and Senate offers resulting in passage of the final Appropriations Act. The Florida Governmental Affairs practice extends far beyond legislative representation. We are experienced in appearing before the Cabinet and all executive agencies on behalf of a wide range of clients. Our knowledge and expertise in all facets of Florida administrative law have given us the reputation as one of the “go to” firms for resolving matters with state government in Tallahassee. Our administrative law litigators are recognized throughout the state as highly skilled and successful in their efforts, and combined with our executive agency lobby team, form an unbeatable combination of access and substance that is rarely found in one firm. Our governmental affairs team is supported by a full-time staff of support personnel dedicated to making sure the team and our clients are kept abreast of any and all relevant state government activities. This includes ongoing monitoring of executive and legislative branches, legislative tracking services, monitoring of committee and floor debate, defensive review of filed legislation and amendments, access to live calendars, monitoring of the press, reviewing the Florida Administrative Code announcements, reviewing proposed rules, preparing reports for clients, and research and drafting services. These services are provided year-round to our clients by one of the largest, most experienced, legislative support staffs of any firm in Florida. Greenberg Traurig’s lawyers and lobbyists have decades of experience with the Florida Governor’s Office, the State Legislature, and with all the Florida state agencies, as well as the long-term relationships necessary for success. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 4 GT Representative State Experience Following is a representative list and description of work performed on behalf of a number of clients which includes both public and private entities. We would be happy to provide additional details upon request. City of North Port, Florida Scope of Services: Federal & State Legislative Representation Length of Contract: 7 Years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Jonathon Lewis, City Manager Contact Phone: 941-429-7165 The state and federal GT Governmental Affairs Team has been the lead lobbyist for the City of North Port since 2005. During these years of representation, we have piloted the city through yearly offensive and defensive legislative efforts of concern to the municipality as well as successfully procured over $1.65 million in state appropriations for major municipal projects. On behalf of North Port, GT has also successfully: Defeated state legislation which would have prevented a freestanding emergency room from being opened within the City of North Port’s city limits. Included language in the State General Appropriations Act requiring the Department of Community Affairs to provide technical assistance to North Port to address antiquated lots and assist in growth planning. Defeated state legislation which would have significantly restricted the city’s ability to conduct public works projects within the city. Florida Association of Court Clerks Scope of Services: State Legislative Representation Length of Contract: 36 years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Ken Kent, Executive Director Contact Phone: 850-921-0808 Our longstanding general counsel representation of the Florida Association of Court Clerks (FACC) has placed us at the forefront of debate on local government issues involving court and county revenues, child support depository, public records, and judicial management. Our representation of the Association included a multi-year effort that has resulted in the authorization and funding of a statewide Comprehensive Case Management System, which is operational in each clerk of court’s office to provide a single portal for access to all court case Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 5 GT data maintained by the clerks. We have also been instrumental in the Associations’ development and operation of a statewide portal to provide access to the Official Records which contain the deeds, mortgages and other documents that are required by statute to be recorded in the county. AT&T Scope of Services: State Legislative Representation Length of Contract: 4 years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Joe York, Vice President, Legislative Affairs Contact Phone: 850-577-5500 In 2009, Greenberg Traurig represented this national telecommunications company in passing the Consumer Choice and Protection Act, legislation aimed at increasing competition in the growing telecommunications market. In the previous session, our team’s efforts prevented a cell phone warranty company from obtaining a statewide monopoly in providing warranties for cell phones and service. In the 2007 Legislative Session, the GT Legislative Team overcame a slue of negative television ads by the Florida Cable Telecommunications Association and other national cable providers and obtained the passage of major legislation on behalf of AT&T. The legislation broke up longstanding government sponsored monopolies in the cable television industry. Enterprise Holdings Scope of Services: State Legislative Representation Length of Contract: 8 years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Jay Ryan, Vice President of Finance Contact Phone: 954-354-5104 Enterprise Holdings is the privately-held entity which operates Enterprise, Alamo and National Rental Car as well as a large fleet management subsidiary. The GT Legislative Team defeated legislation which would have imposed vicarious liability on rental car companies. On behalf of this international company, we worked over several years to secure reforms to the Personal Injury Protection (PIP) provisions for automobile insurance coverage. Further, we gained approval for legislation that streamlined the agent licensing process required of all rental car companies in Florida. We worked closely with the Department of Financial Services to ensure their support of this new structure. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 6 GT Meridian Behavioral Healthcare Scope of Services: State Legislative Representation Length of Contract: 5 years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Maggie Labarta, President & CEO Contact Phone: 352-374-5600 ext. 8221 During the 2009 Session, we assisted in the passage of legislation to restore the Medicaid reimbursement rate for this mental health provider. From the 2005 through 2007 Legislative Sessions, we secured a combined appropriation of nearly $3 million in the General Appropriations Act for the development of a residential treatment program. The funding created and maintained these programs in 11 Florida counties. In fiscally constrained years, the team strategically worked with the leadership and members in order to make mental health a budgetary priority. Florida Assisted Living Association Scope of Services: State Legislative Representation Length of Contract: 4 years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Pat Lange, Executive Director Contact Phone: 850-383-1159 On behalf of this professional health care association, we secured an additional $2.6 million to increase the rate for the Assisted Living for the Elderly (ALE) waiver. This increase was the only Medicaid provider increase not vetoed by the Governor in 2006. In 2007, GT successfully passed legislation requiring the Department of Elder Affairs to adopt a curriculum training program and minimum qualification standards for trainers of Assisted Living Facility administrators and staff. GT also was successful in securing continuing funding for the Assisted Living for the Elderly Waiver of approximately $35 million. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 7 GT Greenberg Traurig’s Team for Delray Beach Greenberg Traurig is uniquely qualified to represent Delray Beach in Tallahassee. GT’s professionals are experts at representing municipalities at the state level. We understand the dynamics of municipal representation and the pressures and challenges faced by local officials and their staffs. Our team possesses a broad array of substantive and political experience. The team includes a former chief of staff to the Senate President, a former counsel to the Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, and a former Legislative Affairs Director and Deputy General Counsel for Governor Jeb Bush. Fred Baggett would serve as Greenberg Traurig’s team leader for Delray Beach. Below is a brief outline on the professional qualifications of our team members. Full biographies can be provided on request. Fred W. Baggett is a senior member of the firm’s National Governmental Affairs Practice. For the past 30 years, Fred has represented a broad range of general business community, associations, and governmental entities before federal, state and local agencies and legislative bodies. A significant portion of his practice focuses on matters relating to health care, insurance, environment regulation, banking and finance, and business and professional regulation. Fred’s practice also includes policy development and advocacy as well as administrative litigation. Hayden Dempsey is the Chair of Greenberg Traurig’s Florida Governmental Affairs Practice and focuses on representing clients before the Florida Legislature and its executive branch agencies. Prior to joining Greenberg Traurig, Hayden served as Director for Legislative Affairs for Governor Jeb Bush where he gained an in-depth knowledge of the Legislature and state government. Most recently, he served as Special Counsel to Gov. Rick Scott, overseeing the Governor’s legislative and public policy initiatives. He also worked closely with the Governor’s state agencies in promoting their legislative agendas. Hayden has been named a member of the Board of Directors of Enterprise Florida, Inc., the State of Florida’s official economic development organization. His broad legislative experience provides him unparalleled insight into all levels of state government. Gus Corbella is the Director of the Governmental Affairs Practice of the firm’s Tallahassee office. Gus has a formidable background in state government, having served as Chief of Staff of the Florida Senate, as well as staff director for the Majority Offices in both chambers. Gus has been appointed by two Governors to serve as a Commissioner on Judicial Nominating Commissions and also serves as the Chairman of the Florida Film and Entertainment Advisory Council. His role as chief advisor to the Legislature’s most prominent leaders provided Gus with an extensive knowledge of the process and issues before the Legislature. Leslie Dughi is the Assistant Director of Governmental Affairs, Tallahassee. Leslie's state practice spans more than 20 years and includes all areas of the executive and legislative branches of government. From her representations, Leslie has gained in-depth knowledge on the innerworkings of Florida government. Further, she served as the Director of Government Affairs for the 135,000-plus member Florida Chamber of Commerce where she developed strategic relationships and led many legislative initiatives important to both public and private employers. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 8 GT In addition to her lobbying experience, Leslie has considerable experience in political communications, serving as the Political Director for Associated Industries, Florida’s largest statewide business association. Throughout her career she has coordinated numerous grassroots advocacy campaigns and has worked with many Florida statewide and legislative campaigns. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 9 GT Legislative Support Services In addition to our attorneys and lobbyists, Greenberg Traurig provides full legislative support services on a continual basis to ensure that our clients’ interests never take a backseat at the Capitol. If the legislature is there, we’re there. And if the legislature’s not there, we’re still there, building staff-to-staff relationships that open doors at those critical late-night hours when access and inside information are crucial. This team is led by Director, Anne Bevis, who has over 20 years of experience in the legislative process, 15 of those serving the needs of GT clients. Assistant Director, Katie Juckett, who joined the GT team after completing her Master’s Degree in Applied American Politics and Policy, has 6 years of experience. They provide vital services offered to our clients, including the following: Legislative Tracking Services – We identify and follow all bills of interest to our clients with up-tothe-minute notification of hearings and actions in committee as well as on the House and Senate floors. A focused tracking list is developed for each client and updated on a daily basis to ensure notification of any movement on priority bills of interest. Moreover, we make sure that clients receive bills texts and amendments of impact for review and comment on a timely basis. We work to develop a client-directed reporting plan to ensure that clients are kept up-todate at their desired frequency. Monitoring of Committee and Floor Debate – In addition to the presence of our lobbying team, our support team monitors all debates on legislation of major impact to our clients. We also are equipped, in-house, to monitor committee hearings and floor actions via audio transmission, The Florida Channel, and internet access. Defensive Review of Filed Legislation and Amendments – Our support team conducts full text searches of all legislation and amendments filed for language impacting our clients. This is done through keyword and statute cite searches. This capability affords us immediate notification of language entering the process that might be detrimental to our clients. Access to Live Calendar – Our firm has access to a live House and Senate Floor Calendar. This provides us with the opportunity for up-to-the-minute review of amendments as they are filed and discussed on the House and Senate Floors. Monitoring of the Press – Our support team daily monitors Florida newspapers and blogs for press coverage that is applicable to our clients. Research and Drafting Services – The Tallahassee support team is equipped to draft proposed legislation, amendments and talk sheets on a moment’s notice. We also have complete research capabilities. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 10 GT Proposed Fee Schedule and Expenses We at Greenberg Traurig look forward to the opportunity to represent the City of Delray Beach. Our Governmental Affairs team typically provides services on a monthly retainer which allows us to offer a broad range of services and gives our clients more value for their money. For this monthly fee, we would commit to provide all of the services enumerated, regardless of the hours required to perform such services. Our proposed fee for the City of Delray Beach is $60,000 per year split into 12 monthly installments of $5,000. Based upon past experience, expenses should not exceed $1,000 annually for travel, registrations and other miscellaneous costs. No expense over $100 would be incurred without prior approval by the City. To assist the City in evaluating the scope of work performed under the monthly retainer, we will provide detailed monthly bills outlining the hours worked and work performed. Further, we will meet periodically to evaluate the services performed to ensure that fair value is provided to the City. City of Delray Beach ‐Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Ronald L. Book, P.A. Contact Information: Ronald L. Book, 18851 NE 29th Avenue, Suite 1010, Aventura, FL 33180, (305) 935‐1866, ron@rlbookpa.com 1. Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach Ronald L. Book, P.A. will assign three firm lobbyists to the City of Delray Beach, including: Ronald L. Book, Esq., President and CEO, Kelly C. Mallette, Director of Government Affairs and Rana G. Brown, Government Affairs Consultant. 2. List types of additional costs above the annual fee, if any (i.e. travel, printing, etc.) None 3. Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: a. Lobby State Legislature Yes b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes c. Lobbylocal and other agencies (i.e. Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). Yes d. Meet regularly with City elected officials and/or staff (i.e., inperson, conference call, etc.) Yes e. Develop City’s state legislative agenda Yes f. Provide weekly legislative updates during session Yes. During session, we provide written reports weekly and phone and e‐mail updates as necessary for priority issues. We also provide written reports and updates coinciding with all interim committee meeting weeks in December, January and February. g. Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes 4. Does your firm provide federal lobbying services? If so, please describe. We do not provide federal lobbying services, but can assist with arranging meetings with federal representatives. a. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, please describe the type of assistance that may be available. We can assist with arranging meetings with federal representatives, congressional staff and federal agencies. We are extremely well accessed within the entire Florida Delegation and with many members outside of the Florida Delegation. b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partners with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. We do not partner with any firms that provide federal lobbying services, but could provide a short list of firms that we believe the city should consider for federal lobbying services. 5. Provide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session, and provide a summary of the final result. HB 465 – (Representative Diaz) District School Board Bonds. Our firm represents the Miami‐Dade County School Board. This bill did a couple of things to allow District school boards additionally flexibility on bonding issues. First, the bill increased the period within which district school board bonds must be retired without approval from the Department of Education, from 20 years to 30 years. It also removed the requirement that certain bonds be callable within 10‐years from date of issuance and allows the district school board to determine the callable term of bonds. This was the second year our firm worked to pass this bill for the school district. In 2011, the bill was approved by legislative committees, but stalled when the Governor’s staff raised concerns. We worked with the Office of the Governor, the bill sponsors and school district staff to address the Governor’s concern. We were successful and the bill was approved by the Legislature in the 2012 session, and later signed by the Governor SB 58/HB 985 – (Senator Flores/Representative Pilon) Lopez Claims. This bill was a claims bill against the City of North Miami. For a number of reasons, the City opposed the claim, and asked us to work against its passage. The plaintiff in the claim hired a prominent Tallahassee firm to work for passage of the bill. When the bill was scheduled for a hearing in the House Civil Justice Subcommittee, we met with the members of the Committee to discuss the details of the case and the City’s position on the bill. The committee voted against the bill and it died in committee on a vote of 7 nays/6 yeas. It was the only claims bill heard last session that was defeated by the House Civil Justice Subcommittee. SB 862/HB 609 – (Senator Simmons/Representative Goodson) Wage Theft. This bill would have completely preempted Miami‐Dade County’s wage theft ordinance. Miami‐Dade County has opposed this legislation. We have been successful in killing the measure for the past two sessions, despite a strong lobbying effort by Florida business groups. City of Delray Beach -Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Weiss, Handler & Cornwell, P.A. Contact Information: Henry B. Handler; hbh@weissandhandlerpa.com 1. Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach Henry B. Handler Ken Pruitt Meghan Hoza 2. List types of additional costs above the annual fee, if any (i.e., travel, printing, etc.) Any additional expense must be agreed upon by the City of Delray Beach before it is incurred. 3. Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: a. Lobby State Legislature Yes, we maintain an office in Tallahassee. We are in Tallahassee full time during committee weeks and legislative session and frequently when the legislature is not in session. b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes, we maintain close working relationships with professionals in the Governor's office and state agencies. c. Lobby local and other agencies (i.e., Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). Yes, we currently lobby Palm Beach County for other clients and have close contacts and experience working with Palm Beach County Commissioners, Constitutional Officers and their respective staffs and the South Florida Water Management District. d. Meet regularly with City elected officials and/or staff (i.e., inperson, conference call, etc.) Yes, we make ourselves available to our clients as requested. We are able to meet with City officials and/or staff in Delray Beach or by conference call at any time. e. Develop City’s state legislative agenda Yes, we will also work closely with the Florida League of Cities on any item approved by the City of Delray Beach. f. Provide weekly legislative updates during session Yes. During legislative session we will provide a weekly summary report detailing legislative action taken during the week, status of legislative issues, and anticipated action during the upcoming week. g. Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Executive Branch and Yes State Agencies 4. Does your firm provide federal lobbying services? If so, please describe. Yes, we have many relationships with the Executive Branch, numerous agencies, and both Houses of Congress. We work on both legislative initiatives and Executive Branch implementation of adopted legislation. The Firm’s Federal lobbying services are coordinated through Joseph Abruzzo. a. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, please describe the type of assistance that may be available. b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partners with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. 5. Provide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session, and provide a summary of the final result. 2012 -Successfully passed SB 694 "Specialized Alzheimer's Services Adult Day Care Act,” which raises the standard of care for adult day care centers by creating a voluntary specialty license for centers that specialize in Alzheimer’s disease and dementiarelated disorder services. Approved by the Governor on April 6, 2012. 2012 -Successfully advocated for the passage of HB 37 “Caylee’s Law,” a bill that would increase penalties for lying to police when a child goes missing. Caylee’s Law makes it a third-degree felony and increase the penalty from a year to five years in prison to give false information to a law enforcement officer in the event of missing child. Approved by the Governor on April 6, 2012. 2012 -Our Firm also successfully advocated for a number of appropriations including: -$1.5 million recurring to fund ten dementia specific daycare centers in Palm Beach, Martin & St. Lucie Counties. -$150,000, which will be used to provide specialized equipment in the care and treatment of dementia specific clients. -$500,000 in funding which will be used to expand the Children’s Crisis Stabilization Unit on New Horizons’ St. Lucie Campus. -$1,083,635 in funding for ChildNet, which was included in $4,665,811 allocated to 10 community-based care agencies to minimize the impacts of the community based care equity model. C:\Documents and Settings\ds\My Documents\City of Delray -Additional Information Sheet.docx Page 1 DRAFT – 11/13/12 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DRAFT 2013 KEY STATE LEGISLATIVE ISSUES TAX REFORM, FINANCE & OTHER BUDGET RELATED ISSUES Develop Fair and Equitable Tax Structure: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that provides a fair and equitable tax structure and allows municipalities the flexibility to provide the level of services desired by their citizens. Legislation should be developed that SUPPORTS simplifying and stabilizing Florida’s state and local tax revenue structure in a manner that provides fairness for both citizens and businesses of our state, while addressing the realities that the current statewide constitutional taxing structure imposes on all levels of government. Arbitrary caps on property assessments, municipal expenditures or municipal revenues, including Tax Payer Bill of Rights (TABOR) proposals, should be OPPOSED. Unfunded Mandates to Local Governments: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that strengthens the prohibition on existing and new unfunded mandates, requires enhanced staff analyses and quantification of the costs to cities and ensures full funding sources be assigned whenever unfunded mandates are identified. The legislature should SUPPORT revisions to the current unfunded mandates provision of the Florida Constitution that would eliminate unnecessary exemptions. The revision should also ensure that any proposed law which contains an unfunded mandate contain only a single subject matter and be enacted by three-fourths vote of each house of the Legislature, only after a duly noticed public hearing at which a current fiscal analysis is available. Communication Services and Local Business Taxes -The City of Delray Beach OPPOSES legislation that restricts or eliminates the authority of municipalities to levy, collect and/or expend the communications services tax and the local business tax. Page 2 DRAFT – 11/13/12 Municipal Pension Plans: The City of Delray Beach OPPOSES legislation that diminishes municipal control over municipal employee pension plan management and funding or that increases municipal funding liabilities. The City will SUPPORT legislation that provides comprehensive municipal firefighter and police officer pension reform and any comprehensive pension reform package should address the issue of flexibility in the use insurance premium tax revenues in place of the previous requirement that additional revenues be used for new, “extra” pension benefits. Police Officer and Firefighter Disability Presumptions: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that modifies the current statutory disability presumptions for firefighters and law enforcement officers relating to tuberculosis, heart disease, or hypertension. HOME RULE Public Officers/Severance Pay: The City SUPPORTS the repeal of SB 88, passed in 2011, that restricts severance pay for any public officer, agent, employee or contractor. The bill removes Home Rule authority over severance pay by creating a limit of up to 20 weeks of severance pay. Regulation of Firearms and Ammunition: The City SUPPORTS the repeal of HB 45, passed in 2011, which prohibits the City from implementing enforcement action policies regarding firearms and ammunition regulation. PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES Fireworks Regulation: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that strengthens state and local regulations on the sale of fireworks and their illegal use. The City of Delray Beach OPPOSES legislation that limits local regulation, or enforcement, of illegal fireworks. Texting While Driving: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS the modification of traffic statutes to include texting while driving as an element of careless driving. Sober Houses: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that provides for more stringent local regulation of these facilities. The City also SUPPORTS full enforcement of existing state regulations on substance abuse provider licensing. Pursuant to 65D-30.003, Florida Administrative Code, all substance abuse components must be provided by persons or entities that are licensed by the Department of Children and Families (DCF), unless otherwise exempt from licensing. Page 3 DRAFT – 11/13/12 Synthetic Drugs: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation banning the manufacture, possession, distribution, purchase or sale of synthetic drugs, including herbal incense, bath salts, synthetic marijuana and/or any cannabinoids in the state of Florida and also encourages funding for drug abuse education. TRANSPORTATION ISSUES Transportation Funding: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that provides proportionate, dedicated and recurring revenue sources for multi-modal municipal and regional transportation projects to ensure that local conditions and needs are addressed. The City will SUPPORT legislation that: Authorizes the Florida Department of Transportation to increase funding to support local and regional transportation and transit alternatives, including “complete street” programs Prohibits the transfer of State Transportation Trust Funds for nontransportation purposes Transportation Funding: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that provides opportunities for additional revenue options to fund municipal transportation infrastructure projects. South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA): The City of Delray Beach OPPOSES any changes to the membership of the SFRTA that would remove the SFRTA’s independent authority to appoint three (3) local citizen appointees. The City also OPPOSES any changes to the SFRTA’s statutory authority to expend local funding that is provided to the SFRTA. Red Light Cameras: The City OPPOSES legislation that repeals the current authorization in the Florida Statutes for red light camera programs. PLANNING RELATED ISSUES Outdoor Advertising: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that provides the home rule authority of municipalities to more strictly regulate outdoor signage, including billboards. Internet Cafes: The City SUPPORTS legislation that will either regulate businesses operating internet “sweepstakes” gaming activities under the gaming commission, or find them in violation of Florida Statues -Chapter 849 and prosecuted accordingly. Page 4 DRAFT – 11/13/12 Housing: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation providing $300 million for the national foreclosure settlement agreement to designated neighborhood stabilization programs to be used for existing local government affordable housing initiatives. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Beach Renourishment: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation preserving funding within the Ecosystem Management and Restoration Trust Fund, to support beach restoration projects throughout the State. This funding is important to the City of Delray Beach due to the ongoing renourishment project for our 2.65 mile beach. Both State & Federal Funding for this project are critical to this important, ongoing project. Water Management District Governance and Authority: The City of Delray Beach will support legislation that amends the powers and duties of the water management districts. Such legislation should: Require legislative ratification of any proposed rule change proposed by a water management district that imposes a financial impact on a local government, and Specify that water management districts have no authority to require local government adoption or repeal of ordinances or to mandate the review or approval of any ordinance. VOTING & PUBLIC INFORMATION Referendum Campaign Involvement: The City of Delray Beach will SUPPORT legislation to remove restrictions in F.S. 106.113 that prohibit a local government, or any person on the local government’s behalf, from spending public money to advocate for the passage or defeat of any issue, referendum, or amendment going to a public vote. Early Voting Sites: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation which would permit the Supervisor of Elections with the option to designate any permanent public facility as an early voting site. Public Notices: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that would authorize municipalities to provide public notice and advertising by means other than newspapers (i.e. Internet posting and other suitable alternatives). Page 5 DRAFT – 11/13/12 APPROPRIATION ISSUES Judicial System Funding: The City of Delray Beach strongly SUPPORTS the full funding of the State Attorney, Public Defender offices and the Judiciary. Reduced court funding has a significant impact on public safety due to the inability to complete the processing of cases. The City makes arrests, but the court system is so overwhelmed due to reductions in funding that cases are “no filed” or “nolle prossed” by the State Attorney’s office or lost in court due to speedy trial requirements. Thus, full funding of the court system to include the Juvenile Assessment Centers statewide is critical to public safety. The City also SUPPORTS the following revenue enhancements for the court system: Expansion of the $65 mandatory court fee to be applied to civil cases in addition to the already allowed criminal cases. This fee would allow for additional revenue to fund the state court system. Continuation and enhancement of the $2.00 recording fee to be distributed to counties to fund court-related technology needs. Full funding for statewide traffic hearing officer programs. EMS Grants: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS continued funding of the Florida Emergency Medical Services’ (EMS) matching grant programs provided by the Florida Department of Health -Bureau of Emergency Medical Services. The programs are authorized to improve and expand EMS statewide. Parks and Recreation Funding: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS expanded funding of the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) under the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). This program provides important financial assistance to local governments for development and/or acquisition of land for public outdoor recreational purposes. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: David T. Harden, City Manager DATE: November 9, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM WS.4 -SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2012 DISCUSSION REGARDING PENSION FUND MANAGEMENT ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Commissioner Carney requested that the management of the City's pension funds be placed on a Work Session agenda for discussion. BACKGROUND The first table attached compares the acturial investment earnings over the last 12 years for both the General Employee's Pension Plan and the Police and Fire Pension Plan. The two following attachemnts carry the comparison all the way back to 1985. In both time periods the General Employee's Plan has earned more, on average, than the Police and Fire Plan. The next two exhibits show the administrative expenses of the two plans. Expenses of the Police and Fire Plan appear to be about five times the expenses of the General Employee's Plan. RECOMMENDATION Commission direction is requested regarding any further information you may wish to receive or persons you may wish to meet with regarding management of these pension plans. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Lula Butler, Director, Community Improvement THROUGH: David Harden, City Manager DATE: November 8, 2012 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM WS.5 -SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2012 POLICY ON NAMING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION City Commission consideration of establishing a policy and procedures to govern the honorary naming of public places. BACKGROUND The policy is intended to add meaning, significance and uniformity to the honorary naming of public facilities, to minimize conflict and to provide a forum for meaningful discussion regarding naming. In addition, a consistent naming policy lends continuity and a sense of community and establishes a means of appropriately recognizing prominent individuals and those who have substantially contributed to the City, the State or the Nation. This proposed process can generate opportunities to induce dynamic community impact, create sensitivity and lasting public relations, express appreciation, and can serve as a means of education. For purposes of this policy, a public place means any building, facility, park lands, and other public spaces owned by or under the control of the the City, including interior and component spaces integral to the whole. This policy does not govern the naming of streets, per the direction of the City Commission, which adopted the following policy on January 25, 1994: "It is the policy of the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida not to entertain requests for the changing of street names in order to recognize or honor individuals." The following words will have the meaning attributed to them: A. “Civic or Charitable Group”shall mean a non-profit entity or group that has made a substantial contribution to the community, either through civic involvement, involvement in historic events relevant to specific City property, or to the geographical location of specific City property; or made a financial and/or in-kind donation to support a specific public service or City property. For-profit entities of any type shall not be considered a civic or charitable group. B. “Individual”shall mean a person who has made a substantial contribution to the community, either through civic involvement, involvement in historical events relevant to the specific City property, financial contribution or to the geographical location of specific City property. C. “Honorary Naming Rights”shall mean the naming of City property to honor the service, commitment, or other type of participation by an individual, or civic or charitable group. D. “Properties”refers to City assets including, but not limited to, real property, facilities, parks, features (e.g. rooms, playgrounds, etc.) and other assets, but not including streets and lanes. E. “City Property” shall mean City-owned or controlled real property, public facilities such as buildings or parks, features or attributes of a facility such as a bench, tree, bridge, walkway, hallway or room, or other public venue. PROCESS: The process to establish honorary naming rights for City property shall be as follows: Any City Commissioner, citizen, group of citizens, or entity or organization may submit an honorary naming proposal to name City property after an individual, civic or charitable group. The naming rights proposal shall be in writing and shall be reviewed by the City Manager or his/her designee, and if found to be in compliance with applicable City policies, shall be referred to a naming committee established under this policy. Honorary naming proposals must include the credentials, character and reputation of the individual, civic or charitable group for whom the naming is being considered. As such, nominations submitted for consideration must be accompanied by appropriate supporting documentation. The City shall establish a “Facility Naming Committee” to review and make recommendations to the Commission on naming proposals. The membership of the committee shall be comprised of representatives from City departments (designated by the City Manager), plus representation from advisory groups, or friends, or recognized support groups with an interest in the property or facility to be named. The Facility Naming Committee shall review the merits of the naming proposal and supporting documentation as submitted and any other applicable history or other information deemed pertinent to the request. The committee shall convene meetings as necessary. After considering the naming rights proposal, the committee will provide their recommendation to the Commission, providing supportive information as appropriate to justify the recommendation. The City Commission shall consider the committee recommendation. The approval of any honorary naming nomination shall be by resolution of the City Commission. RECOMMENDATION City Commisison direction. PALM TRAIL HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC. 424 Palm Trail Delray Beach, Florida 33483         October  31, 2012       Mr. Scott  D. Pape, Senior  Planner   Planning  and  Zoning  Department   100  N.W. 1st  Avenue   City  of  Delray  Beach, FL  33444     RE:   Atlantic  Plaza  II  – Closure  of  NE  7 th  Avenue  at  NE  1 st  Street   Dear  Mr. Pape:  Please  accept  this  letter  on  behalf  of  the  residents  of  the  Palm  Trail  Homeowners  Association, Inc.    Along  with  an  additional  statement  specific  to  the  closure  of  NE  7 th  Avenue  at  NE  1 st  Street, we  submit  to   you  a  recent  resolution  approved  by  the  Board  of  the  PTHOA.   Please  make  this  statement  a  part  of  the   official  record  that  will  be  considered  by  the  Site  Plan  and  Review  Board  for  the  Atlantic  Plaza  II  project.   More  urgently, we  would  also  appreciate  having  this  statement  included  in  the  City  Commission   consideration  of  the  conditional  uses, which  is  slated  for  November  6, 2012.  The  current  proposal  for  Atlantic  Plaza  II, as  presented  privately  to  us  and  publicly  to  the   Planning  & Zoning  Board, is  not  congruent  with  the  profile  of  the  City  or  with  our   neighborhood.  Furthermore, this  project  will  directly  impact  our  neighborhood  causing   excessive  traffic  and  congestion  due  to  the  density  and  magnitude  approved, resulting   in  the  disruption  of  our  peace  and  tranquility.   To  protect  our  neighborhood  from  the  excessive  traffic  and  parking  overflow  from  this   development, we  respectfully  request  the  installation  of  a  barrier  to  block  traffic  on  the   north  side  of  the  proposed  traffic  circle  at  NE  7 th  Ave  and  NE  1 st  St., which  the  developer   has  agreed  to  fund.   This  landscaped  barrier  would  not  allow  traffic  flow  into  our   neighborhood  via  NE  7 th  Ave, but  it  would  allow  pedestrian, bicycle, or  golf  cart  passage.    We  are  not  opposed  to  developing  this  area  bordered  by  the  Intracoastal, Northeast  6 th   Avenue  (east/west), and  Atlantic  Avenue  and  Northeast  1 st  Street  (south/north). We  are   opposed  to  the  size  and  density  of  this  proposed  project  in  relation  to  the  size  and   location  of  this  parcel.  This  project  does  not  complement  the  existing  style, density  and   proportion  of  the  area  and  it  needs  to  be  revised.    It  is  our  position  that  this  parcel  is  a  critical  commerce  area, and  we  agree  this  area   needs  to  be  re ‐developed  into  a  viable  development  for  the  benefit  of  the  City  and  for   all  adjacent  neighborhoods, adding  to  the  value  of  the  whole  area  without  detracting   from  any  one  area.  October  31, 2012   Palm  Trail  HOA, Inc.  Page  Two     We  are  willing  to  work  with  the  developers, City  officials  and  any  related  and  informed   parties  in  order  to  create  a  compatible  and  complimentary  commerce  center  for  the   benefit  of  all.    Thank  you  for  your  assistance  in  making  this  PTHOA  statement  a  part  of  the  official  record.      Respectfully  yours,    Palm  Trail  Homeowners’ Association, Inc.    /as         1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Michelle Quigley <michquig@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, October 25, 2012 4:09 PM To:Jacquet, Al Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:The Atlantic Plaza project Dear Commissioner Jacquet, My name is Michelle Quigley. My husband and I have lived on NE 1st Court, one block away from Atlantic Plaza, since 1989, and our two sons have lived here since they were born, in 1995 and 1999. I am writing to express my deep concern over the new plans to redevelop Atlantic Plaza and the surrounding properties. My neighbors and I have had a lot of experience dealing with variou s plans for Atlantic Plaza ov er the past several years. This latest proposal is the largest and worst we have seen yet. It is completely out of scale with the adjacent neighborhood and the rest of downtown. The buildings are too ta ll for this part of Delray and the density is too great. In 2005, residents packed City Hall to complain that the proj ect was too dense when Carl DeSantis wanted to build 300 residential units on the site. Now he wants a conditional use to build 442 units. As the residents have made clear during t he previous debate over Atlantic Plaza, f our- and five-story buildings adjacent to Veteran's Park and along Atlantic Avenue are not acceptable. There are no nearby buildings that big. The one project along East Atlantic Avenue that is that large – Barr Terrace – is widely viewed as a mistake. Whatever happens at Atlantic Plaza, the developer needs an ad equate plan to deal with the increased traffic that will be dumped onto NE 7th Avenue into our neighborhood. The existing traffic is dangerous to pedestrians and bicyclists (including children who live in the neighbor hood) along this residentia l street, and it will be even more dangerous if nothing is done to divert traffic onto the main thoroughfares. I urge you to not abandon the guidelines of our Downtown Master Plan, which say that we should preserve the character of our downtown by staying with two- an d three-story structures along the Avenue. I realize Atlantic Plaza needs to be redeveloped. But we need to get this project right. And DeSantis' latest plan is not right for Delray. Thank you for all you do for Delray Beach! Best regards, Michelle Quigley 840 NE 1st Court 561-271-8466 To : The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach , Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach’s most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach’s current zoning of 30 units per acre: This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (3 12 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the signifi cant population and commercial space increases several yards f rom the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a “village -by -the -sea”: 2. Height. The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach’s current 48 ft: limit and extends to 60 ft: This exemption further increases the massive scope and sca le of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran’s Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial par king in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also pr ovides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a maj ority of rental rather than privately -owned units. I t is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier locat ion of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analys is on this matter to determine the impact on the C ity. 5. Approval Process – The proposed plan has not been well -communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has n ot been made. There has been minimal public input an d I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re - development project in a generation. ________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Name Address ____________________________________________________________ _____________________ Contact Information Dat e 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Carolyn Patton <chempstead0853@aol.com> Sent:Thursday, November 01, 2012 5:31 PM To:wmmcduffie@mydelraybeach.com; Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; mprenaud@bellsouth.net; joannpeart@comc ast.com; cor526@aol.com; annswank425 @yahoo.com Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Marina Historic Distrkct meeti ng on Atlantic Plaza II project Attachments:MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING.doc Commissioners and friends. Please join us for this critic al discussion. We want to thank Bill Morris and his fellow developers for requesting to move the city commission meeting from Election Night to the following week. (6 p.m. Nov. 13). JoAnn, Cory and Mary: We would very much appreciate y ou forwarding this email to the members of the Lake Ida, Palm Trail and BPOA neighborhood organizations. Carolyn Patton chempstead0853@aol.com MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 6 PM, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 8 TH NORTHERN TRUST BANK 770 E. ATLANTIC AVE. (UPSTAIRS IN LARGE MEETING ROOM) PRESENTATION ON THE ATLANTIC PLAZA II PROJECT IT IS THE LARGEST DEVELOPMENT IN DELRAY BEACH IN A LIFETIME SPEAKER: BILL MORRIS, ONE OF THE DEVELOPERS This is our opportunity to listen to the developer, ask important questions and express an y concerns. The proj ect still has to be voted on by the City Commission on Nov. 13 th at City Hall, and that will be another c hance for you to let you r opinions be known (3 minute speaking time.) The developers are seeking variances on the height and residential density. Height would go from 48 feet to 60 feet and density would go from 197 units to 442. It is important to make developers and city officials aware of our position and opinions. Obviously, th is development will affect us and our property values. Signed, Carolyn and Price Patton, Owners, 65 Palm Square and lot to the south 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Marie Nofsinger <marienofsinger@hotmail.com> Sent:Thursday, October 25, 2012 5:29 PM To:McDuffie, Woodie; Carney, Tom; Frankel, A dam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; Nubin, Chevelle; cor526@aol.com; Helen Kelsey Subject:Atlantic Plaza Commission meeting VS National Presidential Election and more. 11 The presidential election and the city commission meeting regarding Atlantic Plaza happen to fall on the same date. I am sure this is an oversight and that you plan to reschedule the Atlantic Plaza m eeting so that the residents of Delray Beach can join the rest of the country in the vote count and results. Atlantic Plaza As a 20 year resident of NE 7th Aven ue and a 30 year resident of Delray Beach, I am shocked at the lack of the ci ty's concern/interest in the surrounding neighborhoods. Imagine your own street filled with semi truc ks of deliveries, construction vehicles and general visitor traffic being routed by your home at all hours as well as parking on a narrow street already too crowded. There will be no entrance from Fe deral highway into this plaza, only 1st St. , NE 7th Ave., and Atlantic Avenue. I cannot imagine the chaos this will create. If it were your street, wouldn't you want the city to help conserve your quality of life in your own neighborhood? There is a rendering of a "stop gate" that was shown at the Palm Trail Homeowners meeting last night that seems to make good sense for our community in order to avoid high traffic, rogue parking and the general nuisance of noise and pedestrians that will be a ccompanying this development. Bill Morris was in agreement for the street closure, but the city has to become involved for this to happen. I am an acti ve voter in this city and have been for 30 years. What happens to my neighborhood of 20 years will have great impact on my vote at election time. TO INCREASE THE DENSITY for Atlantic Plaza would be th e wrong thing to do. Wrong, wrong, wrong. What used to be a quaint village by th e sea has fast become the exact opposite, and an increase in density for this pl aza will pave the way for more developers to demand more, get more and de stroy the very nucleus of what is left of any beauty and small town feel that attracted folks to Delray Beach. Progress is always inevitable and growth is im portant to sustain a small town/city. We had "great bones" to work with. Delray Beach had a quiet magic of its own. Knowing when to STOP is key to saving what's left. Not knowing when to stop will be quite evident as an abrupt, unruly end. 2 To be reckless and overbuild, over popula te, create gridlock, tear down so many things that gave Delray Beach the magic, and to overlook the very residents who have supported this effort for 20 over years ( and more ) is what will be the end of the magic. City Place, Mizner Park, Sout h Beach......high crime, grid lock, empty spaces, businesses leaving....this is what has to be prevented to save Delray Beach. Please let us block off NE 7th Aven ue in order to keep the integrity of our neighborhood - to keep it from becoming just another throughway to Atlantic Plaza. Please reschedule th e Atlatic Plaza city commission meeting for another night other than the President ial Election. Please help save our neighborhood from be coming a nightmare. A resident of this city for 30 years, Marie Gardella 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Steve Plamann <steve_plamann@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, October 22, 2012 10:16 PM To:McDuffie, Woodie Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza Dear Mayor McDuffie, My name is Steve Plamann. My wife and I and our two sons live on N.E. First Court, one block away from Atlantic Plaza. We have lived in downtown Delray since 1987. I am writing to you express my deep concern ove r the new plans to redevelop Atlantic Plaza and the surrounding properties. I and my neighbors have a lot of experience over the last 10 years dealing with various plans for Atlantic Plaza. I know you do, too, since you we re on the Commission during the last go-round. This latest proposal is the biggest and the worst we have seen yet. It is so huge that it is completely out of scale with the adjacent neighborhood and the rest of downtown. The buildings are too tall for this part of Delray and the density is too great. In 2005, residents packed City Hall to compla in that the project was too dense when Carl DeSantis was trying to build 300 residential units on the site. No w he wants a conditional use to build 442 units. As the residents have made clear during the previous debate over Atlantic Plaza, four or five- floor buildings adjacent to Veteran's Park and along the Avenue are not acceptable. There are no nearby buildings that big. And the one project along East Atlantic that is that large – Barr Terrace – is widely view ed as a mistake. Whatever happens at Atlantic Pl aza, the developer needs an ade quate plan to deal with the increased traffic that will be dumped onto NE 7 th Ave into our neighborhood. There are lots of children and other pedestrians al ong this residential street and something needs to be done to divert traffic onto the main thoroughfares. I urge you to stick with the guidelines of our Do wntown Master Plan, which say that we should preserve the character of our downtown by sticking to two and three story structures along the Avenue. I realize Atlantic Plaza needs to be redeveloped. But we need to get this project right. And DeSantis' latest plan is not right for Delray. 2 Thank you for all your great work for Delray Beach! Best regards, Steve Plamann 840 N.E. 1st Court 561-213-9566 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:ProfBea@aol.com Sent:Wednesday, October 31, 2012 5:43 PM To:McDuffie, Woodie; Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Fwd: Info From: ProfBea@aol.com To: carney@mydelraybeach.com , nubin@mydelraybeach.com Sent: 10/31/2012 5:27:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Fwd: Info From: ProfBea@aol.com To: nubin@delraybeach.com Sent: 10/31/2012 5:10:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Info City Clerk,Mayor Woodie McDuffie, As a member of the t ax paying Delray Beach community, I would like to know why a meeting of such importance to our community is being scheduled on election night? The Atlantic Plaza 11 development group has ignored the city's limits for height and density and has overlooked our neighborhood's need for protection from huge amounts of traffic stemming from the incr eased number of proposed rental units. Election night should be for our focus on our nation, not a conflict with our own neighbors. I h ave been one of your supporters for a while. If this is the last thing you leave for Delray Beach as a legacy, shame on you. Please reconsider the time of this meeting. Thank You, Beatrice Ann Rizzo 50 East Rd, Apt 9F Delray Beach,Fl. 33483 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Torrey Everett <te3@bellsouth.net> Sent:Wednesday, October 31, 2012 4:56 PM To:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza Proposal My  wife  and  I  live  at  50  East  Road, Delray  Beach.  We  are  very  much  opposed  to  the  current  proposal  to  redevelop   Atlantic  Plaza.  This  issue  has  been  discussed  several  times  before  and  a  deal  was  struck  that  was, if  not  ideal, at  least   was  acceptable  to  the  residents  in  the  area.  Now, the  developer  is  coming  back  for  another  bite  at  the  apple  ‐‐ higher   density, rental  instead  of  owned  apartments, more  bulk  in  the  buildings.  Traffic  is  still  an  issue.  As  you  know, this  site  is  adjacent  to  the  Atlantic  Avenue  bridge, which  during  the  season  opens   twice  an  hour  pretty  much  all  day  long.  With  the  entrance  redrawn  to  Atlantic  Avenue, instead  of  Federal  Highway, this   will  be  a  nightmare.  There  is  a  provision  for  entrance  off  of  First  Street, but  it  would  be  hidden  from  passersby  on   Federal.    The  notion  of  shared  parking, that  the  residents  will  be  out  at  work, thereby  freeing  up  parking  for  the  commercial   tenants  is  foolish.  What  about  in  the  evenings  and  weekends?  What  about  people  who  work  at  home  or  in  the   commercial  space  within  the  development.  Their  spaces  are  not  freed  up.  Putting  parking  below  ground  does  help   reduce  the  bulk  of  the  buildings, but  there  is  a  reason  why  virtually  no  homes  in  Florida  have  basements  ‐‐ a  high  water   table.  Can  the  developer  point  at  a  single  development  in  coastal  Florida  where  below  ground  parking  has  worked?  The  property  is  adjacent  to  one  of  the  most  used  parks  in  the  City, Veterans  Park, and  the  proposed  bulk  of  the  buildings   will  have  a  damaging  influence  on  the  atmosphere  and  activities  in  the  park.  Finally, I  am  very  disappointed  in  the  Commission's  decision  to  discuss  the  biggest  project  in  recent  Delray  history  on  the   night  of  the  national  elections, a  time  when  many  people  will  want  to  stay  home  to  follow  the  election  results.  Being   charitable, I  ascribe  this  to  foolishness  on  the  Commission's  part, rather  than  an  intentional  effort  to  discourage   community  participation  in  the  process.  We  hope  you  will  tell  the  developer  that  this  issue  has  already  been  resolved  and  stop  bringing  it  back.  Torrey  & Carole  Everett     1 Wynn, Kimberly From:sheah@fuse.net Sent:Wednesday, October 31, 2012 5:43 PM To:Carney, Tom; Jacquet, Al; Frankel, Adam; Gr ay, Angeleta; wmcdufffie@mydelraybeach.com Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza II A call for votes at 11:15 pm by the PZB on 10/15, a Comm ission Meeting scheduled for Election Night on an issue of this magnitude - I would sa y it looks like the deck has been stac ked!! I am a new permanent voting resident of downtown Delray Beach.and will do everythi ng legal to prevent this project from going forward with the proposed density. I urge you to take the time to ensure Delray's future. Sheila Sreden 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:N Ramachandran <nkrama1@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:28 PM To:Carney, Tom; frankle@mydelraybeach.com; Gr ay, Angeleta; jacqet @mydelraybeach.com; McDuffie, Woodie Cc:Nubin, Chevelle; ebetta@comcast.net Subject:Atlantic Plaza 11 Re Development Plan I am a resident in the city of Delray on the east side of the inter coastal.I was involved li ke most residents in the city, during the many town hall meetings and the city hall meetings for the last proposal 3+ years ago.It took us all most a year to get that the way the community would like to see it bu ilt including the height and the depth. Before anything was approved study was done to see the traffi c pattern on Atlantic avenue with the brid ge so close to the plaza.That was so crucial in deciding the height and the depth. Also that was pr esented during the season when all the residents were here and most of us took part in these meetings.Another important factor was how veterans park will look with these project. so they let us incorporate veterans Parke modification to blend in and also very much visible and accessible to the public.We took pride in this and helped and worked wi th the developers. This project on the other hand was presented in August wh en majority of the residents are still out of town and was passed by the council 11.30PM when most of the people have left.On top of that the next meeting is set for the 6Th of November on election day.In the history of this city I do not believe there ever was a meeting set on election day.This such a mammoth project so important to us all, and you, our representatives treating this like a little some thing with no significant impact to our beautiful city. The traffic impact, the proximity to the inter costal bridge none of this is taken into consideration in your process.How could you do this.We trusted you to lead the proper way like the previous plan instead you abandoned us. It will be very hard to trust you all to do the wright thing in the future.You have a lot to answer .Why you started in August? Why this project which was the most impotent subject put as last to discu ss in all your meetings and vote for it 11.30PM when most people have left ? On top of that you scheduled a meeting of this importance on election night.This no t only smells fishy it taste very fishy. Please cancel the 6Th meeting and reschedu le for another day.We would appreciate your cooperation and also like to see this on top of your list instead at the end. Thanking you, Sincerely, Nalini Ramachandran. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:kanemanor <kanemanor@aol.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:25 PM To:Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, A ngeleta; Jacquet, Al; McDuffie, Woodie Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza II development I live at 50 East Road, and I stro ngly disagree with the proposal of the developers of the Atlantic Plaza. Besides the increase of traffic which is al ready overwhelming on Atlantic Avenue, this proposal lowers the standards of our great town to medi ocrity by increasing the density and height beyond measure from what has been allowed. Four years ago you turned down a similar plan which I hope you will again hold tight to what makes our community unique and be autiful - a village that is limited in tall buildings and tight spaces. I think people settle in Delray Beach because it is a community with open spaces, low density and small town feeling. Please let's not be anot her Fort Lauderdale or Deerf ield or Pompano Beach. Pat Humphrey 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Joan Mitrani <joanmitrani@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:47 PM To:Jacquet, Al; McDuffie, Woodie; Carney , Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza ll I am a Delray Beach resident residing at Barr Terrace. I would like to know why an important meeting regarding the city's own limits on height and density is schedu led to be held on election night. I would also like to know why the city commission should ignore the city's own limits for Atlantic Plaza ll. I also wish to express my concern about the number of rental units that are being proposed. Additionally, the need for protection from overflow tr affic must be addressed. I will expect to hear from you concerning how you will handle these issues. Yours truly, Joan Mitrani@gmail.com 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Andre Stevens <andre.stevensmj@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 01, 2012 4:12 PM To:Nubin, Chevelle Cc:carney@mydelraybeach.com frankel@mydelraybeach.com agray@mydelraybeach.com jacquet@mydelraybeach.com wm cduffie@mydelraybeach.com Subject:Atlantic Plaza !! I want to express my concern why a meeting of such importan ce is being held on election night? Our neighborhood's need for protection from overflow tra ffic from the plaza. Also concern about the number of rental units that are being proposed. Sincerely Yours. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:John Papaloizos <john@greek123.com> Sent:Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:32 AM To:Gray, Angeleta Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:November 6th Metting- Atlantic Plaza II Dear  Commissioner  Gray,  I  am  contacting  you  to  express  my  concern  about  the  project  and  process  for  the  Atlantic  Plaza  II    redevelopment  project.  As  a  long  term  resident  I  have  many  questions  about  the  impact  of  the  density  exception  that  was  granted  by   the  planning  and  zoning  board  that  are  left  unanswered. I  don’t  believe  the  project  has  been  given  the  scrutiny   it  deserves  and  cannot  understand  why  previous  approvals  should  be  revised.     Most  problematic  is  the  way  in  which  the  process  has  unfolded. Brought  up  in  August  and  voted  on  at  an   11:15  meeting  when  everyone  had  left  through  attrition. Its  hard  to  believe  that  the  next  meeting  is  scheduled   for  election  night  when  everyone  wants  to  be  home  watching  the  news. Is  there  a  way  to  postpone  the   meeting?     In  short  I  have  a  serious  process  in  general  and  feel  completely  disenfranchised. I  know  your  schedule  must   keep  you  extremely  busy  but  could  you  take  the  time  to  email  or  call  me  with  a  reply?     Thank  you  and  I  look  forward  to  your  response,  John  Papaloizos   561 ‐860 ‐6093      1 Wynn, Kimberly From:SUSAN RIMAUD-RESNICK <r imaud.susanres@wanadoo.fr> Sent:Thursday, November 01, 2012 10:40 AM To:Carney, Tom Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza II : keep on listening! Dear Sir, Please use your authority to continue the discussion between Delray residents a nd the Delray government concerning the Atlantic Plaza 11 proposal. The subject is critical to our live s in Delray and and the late night vote at the Planning and Zoning meeting should not be thought of as definitive. Th e Commission meeting should be resheduled to a date other than election day to permit full discussion of the project. Sincerely, Susan Resnick Barr Terrace Condo Owner 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Gill Bentley <kayakleland@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 01, 2012 5:54 PM To:Gray, Angeleta Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Hold the line for Delray-Atlantic II Project. DEAR COMMISSIONER GRAY: We could't believe this project is again proposed. It is even more dense and higher than the last time and the last time it wa s vehemently opposed by the neighborhood. . Commissioner Gray, when will the City hold the line on ITS OWN CITY ORDINANCES for height and density ? Yet an other variance is a lousy precedent . The project of this size will surely cast shade and dwarf both park and its surroundings . Alas, when the bridge is up, the winter traffic congestion is awful NOW! Cars are unable to cross or turn on to Atlantic Ave. as it is now. It will certainly lessen the attractiveness of the area to us. WE HOPE YOU WILL GIVE THIS MATTER AND OUR OPINION AS AREA RESIDENTS YOUR DEEP CONSIDERATION, THANK YOU. SINCERELY, THOMAS AND GILL BENTLEY CC City Clerk of Delray 50 East Road, 3G, Delray Beach, FL 33483 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Gill Bentley <kayakleland@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 01, 2012 6:05 PM To:Jacquet, Al Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic II Plaza- even bigger! DEAR COMMISSIONER JACQUET: As old ti me winter residents in the Barr Terrace & taxpayers , we couldn't believe this project was up again for consideration and in even gr eater violation of Delray Zoning Ordinances on density and height . The neighborhood vehemently oppo sed the project then and we know many still very much do today. It will dwarf the surrounding area, put the Veterans Park in the shade and create even more congesti on to that area than there is now.- especially when the bridge is up.. SHAME! IT IS TIME TO HOLD THE LINE FOR DELRAY, COMMISSIONER. Thank you for giving this your deep consideration. Thomas and Gill Bentley 50 East Road, 3G, Delray Beach, Fl 33483 cc City Clerk of Delray 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Gill Bentley <kayakleland@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 01, 2012 6:20 PM To:McDuffie, Woodie Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:NO ON ATLANTIC II PLAZA DEAR MAYOR: As residents of Delray a nd the Barr Terrace opposite the proposed project, we were shocked to see the project even taller and more dense than the last time it was proposed. It seems to us that your legacy and hard work as Mayor should not be remembered as the Mayor who support ed this behemoth in direct violation of long standing carefully drawn up Zoning Ordinances restricting height and de nsity. Just think about the congestion in winter when the bridge is up. It is a mess now. TIME TO STAND FIRM, MAYOR, SINCERELY, THOMAS AND GILL BENTLEY 50 East Road, Apt. 3G, Delray Beach, FL 33483 CC City Clerk of Delray 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Gill Bentley <kayakleland@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 01, 2012 5:14 PM To:Carney, Tom Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic II Plaza-what still more? DEAR VICE-MAYOR CARNEY: As longtim e winter residents of Delray and the Barr Terrace directly opposite the ATlantic II Plaza Proposal , we continue to oppose this evergrowing project. My , how the units, density and height sure grew ev en since the last time this was pr oposed! . The prospect of winter, the bridge up and even more congestion in th e area of Atlantic Avenue is gross. It is a frequent mess now. What happened to Delray zoning law on resi dential unit of some 30 untis per acre? Years ago Delray carefully passed a height limitation- and , compared to Boca and othe r cities, it is absolutely part of its beauty, allowing light and view to the surroundings . Will the City grant yet another variance ..again? What a precedent! What a mockery of basic city planning that will surely dw arf Veterans Park, the surrounding area and destroy the ambience of an already congested area. DEAR VICE-MAYOR, IT IS TIME TO HOLD THE LINE FOR DELRAY. SINCERELY, TOM AND GILL BENTLEY CC CITY CLERK OF DELRAY Thomas & Gill l Bentley 50 East Road Apt. 3G Delray Beach, FL 33483 561 278 4776 kayakleland@gmail.com 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Carolyn Patton <chempstead0853@aol.com> Sent:Thursday, November 01, 2012 5:31 PM To:wmmcduffie@mydelraybeach.com; Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; mprenaud@bellsouth.net; joannpeart@comc ast.com; cor526@aol.com; annswank425 @yahoo.com Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Marina Historic Distrkct meeti ng on Atlantic Plaza II project Attachments:MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING.doc Commissioners and friends. Please join us for this critic al discussion. We want to thank Bill Morris and his fellow developers for requesting to move the city commission meeting from Election Night to the following week. (6 p.m. Nov. 13). JoAnn, Cory and Mary: We would very much appreciate y ou forwarding this email to the members of the Lake Ida, Palm Trail and BPOA neighborhood organizations. Carolyn Patton chempstead0853@aol.com 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Dorothy Chiesa <dorothy.chiesa1@earthlink.net> Sent:Friday, November 02, 2012 11:32 AM To:Carney, Tom Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza We need people to support our shops and restaurants. We do not need more residents - we need visito rs - a steady and conti nuing stream of them Visitors need PARKING not Housing. I hear complaints from people who don't want to come cause its too hard to park. And dont mention Valets - a car is a car and it needs a space no matter who parks it. Terrific events are planned and people can't PARK. If its too hard to park they won't come Do not approve the revised plan for Atlantic Plaza - 242 ne w apartments proposed with 30 new Parking places is so insulting - I can only think they must have been getting bl ow jobs when they approved. Got your attention? This is not just about Atlantic Plaza - its about our lovely vill age by the sea. Thats why people love to come to us. Dont strangle it with traffic - and not enough parking - thats the death toll for any town. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Dorothy Chiesa <dorothy.chiesa1@earthlink.net> Sent:Friday, November 02, 2012 11:50 AM To:Frankel, Adam Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza We need to support our shope and Restaurants. Part of t hat is new residents and there is so much new housing springing up just on Federal along We do not need more residents - we need VISITO RS -a steady and continuing stream of the VISITORS need PARKING. not Housing. I hear complaints all the time not from people who don't want to come here because its too hard to park. And dont mention Valets - a car is car and needs a space regardless who parks it. Terrific Events are planned & people will think twice about attenting if its too difficult to PARK. Do not approve the revised plan for Atlantic Plaza. 242 new apts planned and only 30 PARKING. Thats so insulting I can only think the supportors must have been getting blow jobs at t he time. What else could account for such stupidity? Got your attention? This is not just about Atlantic Plaza - its about our lovely v illage by the sea. Thats whats make people come to visit. Dont strangle it with more traffic and not enough parking. Thats t he death toll of any town. Do not approve any additional units for Atlantic Plaza. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Chris Davey <cmdavey@aol.com> Sent:Friday, November 02, 2012 11:57 AM To:Carney, Tom Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza II Dear Vice-Mayor Carney, I am writing to state my opposition to the revised proposal for At lantic Plaza II. I have been a resident of "Downtown" Delray Beach for 5+ years and moved here because of the "Village By The Sea" charm that is so different than all the other South Florida communities. As an interested resident, and a person who has worked in the real estate field for the past 18 years, I oppose the revised plan for the following reasons: 1. The expansion to 50+ residential units/acre is far, far t oo high. I live in Mallory Squar e where the residential density i s approximately 22 units/acre. The density of The Meridian (across the street and on Federal Highway northbound just 3 blocks south of Atlantic Avenue) is 30 units/acre. The density of 30 residential units/acre, PLUS office space, PLUS retail space, PLUS restaurant space is MORE than adequate for this site. 2. The developer's plan to have 312 residential and workforce re ntal units, plus 130 condominium units, is not in the best interest of the City. Homeowners are in the best interest of the City and undoubtedly ma ke for a more stable resident base than do transient renters. As a real estate professional , I am sure that gaining approval for the rental units, and the higher density, makes it much easier for the developers to finan ce the project. However, the City and it's residents should not be bending over backwards to cut a deal that is in the dev eloper's interest and not in t he City's. If the developers can't finance and build the project as condominiums, and as approved, let them sell it to someone who will. Believe me, there will be people willing to take over the project, but the pric e they are willing to pay may not be what the developers want. However, that is hardly the pr oblem of the City, or its residents. 3. There is nowhere near enough parking provided for a resident ial/office/retail/restaurant complex of this size. Having been involved in the approval and design of large commercial and mixed use projects in the past, let me say that the whole idea of "transitional" parking is a theory without merit. The parking assumptions are just that, assumptions. Hard data, and proven calculations would state that much, much more parking is nece ssary for a complex of this size and mix. It seems to me that the developer came up with a plan to build and then employed a "theory" and "low-balled" numbers to justify the amount of parking that could be prov ided at the site. What I find unbelievable is that the City Planners seem to agree with the developers as if the parking "plan" is based upon pr oven historical data and facts instead of "theory". We do not need the most important and valuable pi ece of real estate developed in the City, in a generation (at least), built based upon a parking "theory". This project nee ds adequate parking and the last thing we need in Downtown Delray is more valet parking to make up for inadequate and improper planning. 4. Allowing underground parking so close to a tidal body of wa ter is another "theory". The parking that is below grade will probably be unusable at some point in the future. It is my understanding that the developer s have not been able to give ANY examples of parking being constructed as planned, in Sout h Florida, so close to a tidal body of water. Personally, I would not want just one example, I think there should be m any, as we want something t hat is proven, not another theory. I understand why the developers want this parking below grade as it is the only way to fit even the inadequate amount of parking they plan to provide on the site. Mo ving the parking to grade level would require either a taller structure, or a larger footprint. Elimi nating the parking below grade would require a reduction in some aspect of the plan, be it residential units, office space, retail space, or restauran t space. The below grade parking is just another example of skewed calculations and theories being used in order to just ify an outcome. If building parking below grade is so easy and a good idea, why didn't the City do it when they built their parking garages on NE 2nd Ave. and SE 1st Ave.? Those structures were not less than 150 feet from the intracoastal waterway, like the one the developers plan on building. 5. City residents were not informed or brought into th e process about these radical changes to an already approved plan. The plan that has currently been approved was review ed and approved with public input and a significant amount of review by the City several years ago. To rush through extens ive changes is the opposite of what the citizens want. In my opinion, the Planning and Zoning Board behaved in a disgrace ful manner by approving this plan while having so many unanswered questions. The fact that the plan was voted on at almost midnight when most residents had left the meeting 2 is certainly a "black eye" for that Board. It seemed like a ma jority of the Board had many questions but were "kicking the can down the road" by saying that these issues could be addressed later, by the City Commission. Isn't it the job of the Planning and Zoning Board to get the answers and require changes BEFORE they approve something rather than approving it and saying issues like parking, height, traffic, et c. can be addressed later? City government is supposed to act on behalf of the citizens and in the best interests of the co mmunity and the citizens. So far, the actions of some of our appointed officials (employees of the city and the appointed memb ers of the Planning and Zoning Board) do not meet that threshold. Hopefully our elected officials will do better. Please rest assured that I will attend the City Commission me eting on this matter. I hope I can count on your vote to oppose this revised plan. I have voted in every election for the past 29 years and do not believe I have missed one partisan or non-partisan election. Most of the time I abhor people who are "one issue" voters. However, on this issue I will certainly be a one issue voter. If you oppose this plan I w ill certainly be grateful. However, if you support this plan you can certainly count on my opposition to your future candidacy no matter what office you decide to seek in the future. Thank you, in advance, for you consideration of my views, Christopher Davey 319 E. Mallory Circle Delray Beach, FL 33483 Tel: 561-865-5186 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Chris Davey <cmdavey@aol.com> Sent:Friday, November 02, 2012 12:00 PM To:Frankel, Adam Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza II Dear Deputy Vice-Mayor Frankel, I am writing to state my opposition to the revised proposal for At lantic Plaza II. I have been a resident of "Downtown" Delray Beach for 5+ years and moved here because of the "Village By The Sea" charm that is so different than all the other South Florida communities. As an interested resident, and a person who has worked in the real estate field for the past 18 years, I oppose the revised plan for the following reasons: 1. The expansion to 50+ residential units/acre is far, far t oo high. I live in Mallory Squar e where the residential density i s approximately 22 units/acre. The density of The Meridian (across the street and on Federal Highway northbound just 3 blocks south of Atlantic Avenue) is 30 units/acre. The density of 30 residential units/acre, PLUS office space, PLUS retail space, PLUS restaurant space is MORE than adequate for this site. 2. The developer's plan to have 312 residential and workforce re ntal units, plus 130 condominium units, is not in the best interest of the City. Homeowners are in the best interest of the City and undoubtedly ma ke for a more stable resident base than do transient renters. As a real estate professional , I am sure that gaining approval for the rental units, and the higher density, makes it much easier for the developers to finan ce the project. However, the City and it's residents should not be bending over backwards to cut a deal that is in the dev eloper's interest and not in t he City's. If the developers can't finance and build the project as condominiums, and as approved, let them sell it to someone who will. Believe me, there will be people willing to take over the project, but the pric e they are willing to pay may not be what the developers want. However, that is hardly the pr oblem of the City, or its residents. 3. There is nowhere near enough parking provided for a resident ial/office/retail/restaurant complex of this size. Having been involved in the approval and design of large commercial and mixed use projects in the past, let me say that the whole idea of "transitional" parking is a theory without merit. The parking assumptions are just that, assumptions. Hard data, and proven calculations would state that much, much more parking is nece ssary for a complex of this size and mix. It seems to me that the developer came up with a plan to build and then employed a "theory" and "low-balled" numbers to justify the amount of parking that could be prov ided at the site. What I find unbelievable is that the City Planners seem to agree with the developers as if the parking "plan" is based upon pr oven historical data and facts instead of "theory". We do not need the most important and valuable pi ece of real estate developed in the City, in a generation (at least), built based upon a parking "theory". This project nee ds adequate parking and the last thing we need in Downtown Delray is more valet parking to make up for inadequate and improper planning. 4. Allowing underground parking so close to a tidal body of wa ter is another "theory". The parking that is below grade will probably be unusable at some point in the future. It is my understanding that the developer s have not been able to give ANY examples of parking being constructed as planned, in Sout h Florida, so close to a tidal body of water. Personally, I would not want just one example, I think there should be m any, as we want something t hat is proven, not another theory. I understand why the developers want this parking below grade as it is the only way to fit even the inadequate amount of parking they plan to provide on the site. Mo ving the parking to grade level would require either a taller structure, or a larger footprint. Elimi nating the parking below grade would require a reduction in some aspect of the plan, be it residential units, office space, retail space, or restauran t space. The below grade parking is just another example of skewed calculations and theories being used in order to just ify an outcome. If building parking below grade is so easy and a good idea, why didn't the City do it when they built their parking garages on NE 2nd Ave. and SE 1st Ave.? Those structures were not less than 150 feet from the intracoastal waterway, like the one the developers plan on building. 5. City residents were not informed or brought into th e process about these radical changes to an already approved plan. The plan that has currently been approved was review ed and approved with public input and a significant amount of review by the City several years ago. To rush through extens ive changes is the opposite of what the citizens want. In my opinion, the Planning and Zoning Board behaved in a disgrace ful manner by approving this plan while having so many unanswered questions. The fact that the plan was voted on at almost midnight when most residents had left the meeting 2 is certainly a "black eye" for that Board. It seemed like a ma jority of the Board had many questions but were "kicking the can down the road" by saying that these issues could be addressed later, by the City Commission. Isn't it the job of the Planning and Zoning Board to get the answers and require changes BEFORE they approve something rather than approving it and saying issues like parking, height, traffic, et c. can be addressed later? City government is supposed to act on behalf of the citizens and in the best interests of the co mmunity and the citizens. So far, the actions of some of our appointed officials (employees of the city and the appointed memb ers of the Planning and Zoning Board) do not meet that threshold. Hopefully our elected officials will do better. Please rest assured that I will attend the City Commission me eting on this matter. I hope I can count on your vote to oppose this revised plan. I have voted in every election for the past 29 years and do not believe I have missed one partisan or non-partisan election. Most of the time I abhor people who are "one issue" voters. However, on this issue I will certainly be a one issue voter. If you oppose this plan I w ill certainly be grateful. However, if you support this plan you can certainly count on my opposition to your future candidacy no matter what office you decide to seek in the future. Thank you, in advance, for you consideration of my views, Christopher Davey 319 E. Mallory Circle Delray Beach, FL 33483 Tel: 561-865-5186 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Arlen D. Dominek <adominek@bellsouth.net> Sent:Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:54 PM To:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:FW: Atlantic Plaza II Unfortunately, I  believe  that  I  did  not  have  the  correct  email  address  for  you  and  am  accordingly  retransmitting  it.    From: Arlen D. Dominek [mailto:adominek@bellsouth.net] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 19:09 To: 'carney@mydelraybeach.com'; 'frankel@mydelraybeach.com'; 'agray@mydelraybeach.com'; 'jacquet@mydelraybeach.com'; 'wmcduffie@mydelraybeach.com' Cc: 'nubbin@mydelraybeach.com' Subject: Atlantic Plaza II   To  the  City  Commission:  You  have  been  asked  to  give  consideration  to  a  new  – and  quite  controversial  ‐conditional  use  request  for   increased  density  for  Atlantic  Plaza.  A  similar  density  request  was  not  granted  at  the  inception  of  this  project   a  number  of  years  ago  and  should  not  be  granted  now  for  the  same  reasons  that  it  was  not  granted   originally.  Given  that  this  project  sits  at  one  of  the  major  gateways  to  one  of  our  great  treasures, the  beach   front, I  would  urge  you  to  carefully  review  this  project  and  to  allow  for  your  consideration  of  other  factors  as   well  as  for  input  by  your  constituents  before  making  any  final  decision.  I  would  also  ask  that  you  defer  the  first  reading  of  this  request  scheduled  for  your  meeting  on  November  06,  the  evening  of  Election  Day, when  so  many  of  your  constituents  and  undoubtedly  yourselves  will  be  focused   on  the  election  itself.  I  would  also  request  that  it  be  scheduled  such  that  sufficient  time  is  allotted  for   consideration  without  having  the  number  of  attendees  dwindling  because  of  the  late  hour  as  well  as  for  your   own  convenience  and  endurance.  There  is  no  question  that  this  property  should  be  enhanced  to  contribute  to  the  overall  desirability  of  living,  working, and  shopping  in  Delray  Beach.  Delray  Beach  has  changed  for  the  better  since  my  first  visit  some  25   years  ago  and  since  the  time  that  I  started  working  and  living  here  in  1998.  However, there  are  a  number  of   very  serious  concerns  and  issues  regarding  this  project, not  the  least  of  which  are  the  financial  feasibility  of  the project, the  feasibility  of  creating  parking  below  sea  level, and  the  fact  that  any  additional  revenues  will  not  go   into  City’s  own  coffers.  The  proposed  density  is  too  great  ‐ particularly  in  the  context  of  the  transient  (rental) population  now  that   funding  is  oriented  towards  rental, rather  than  owner ‐occupied, property.  Such  density  combined  with  the   transient  population  potentially  adversely  affects  the  nature  of  our  community.  Traffic  and  parking  issues  have  not  been  sufficiently  analyzed  and  mitigated.  We  already  have  a  gridlock   along  the  length  of  Atlantic  Avenue  from  east  of  the  bridge  to  Swinton, particularly  when  the  bridge  is   open.  Traffic  will  be  increased  within  neighboring  residential  areas.  Moreover, the  assumptions  for  parking   needs  predicated  upon  mixed  use  are  not  well  founded.  2  You  cannot  assume  that  the  spaces  per  unit  are  sufficient  or  that  residents  will  not  be  home  during  the   day.   With  increased  prosperity  comes  more  cars  per  unit, not  to  mention  that  many  of  these  luxury   apartments  may  be  shared  by  roommates, thereby  further  increasing  the  number  of  cars  per  unit.   More  people  work  at  home, meaning  that  their  cars  will  not  be  gone  during  the  day.   Plus, the  increased  number  of  workers  who  travel  via  plane  and  get  to  the  airport  by  car  service   suggests  that  their  cars, too, will  be  parked  at  home  during  the  day.   Our  increased  percentage  of  snowbirds  also  suggests  that  there  will  be  more  resident  cars  parked   during  the  day.  It  is  not  clear  how  Veterans  Park  will  be  integrated  into  this  project.  The  residents  and  visitors  to  Delray  use   this  park, for  art  shows, relaxation, and  concerts.  Some  of  us  vote  there.  Our  children  and  our  grandchildren   play  there.  Consideration  of  this  should  not  be  deferred  until  it  is  too  late.  No  green ‐use  requirements  have  been  imposed  for  this  project.  Given  the  state  of  the  American  debt   resulting  from  oil  imports  as  well  as  the  potentially  unfunded  additional  burden  upon  our  infrastructure,  should  these  not  be  considerations  in  a  project  that  will  shape  the  nature  of  Delray  Beach  for  many  years?  Even  though  it’s  often  difficult  to  measure  or  quantify  the  attributes  of  appearance, desirability, and   ambiance, they  are  important  to  the  gestalt  and  viability  of  a  community.  We  all  know  what  comprises  a   nice  place  to  visit, to  vacation  in, to  shop  in, and  to  live  in.  We  sense  it;  we  know  it;  we  feel  it.  Let’s  make   sure  that  this  project  makes  us  feel  that  way.  But, we  don’t  have  any  idea  of  what  this  project  will  look  like  or   how  it  will  fee.  The  developer  has  not  provided  charrettes  for  our  view, adequately  addressed  parking  and   traffic  issues, clearly  identified  what  kind  of  retail  presence  will  be  established  (which  is  hard  to  do  when   rental  rates  haven’t  been  established), or  spent  time  winning  over  the  residents  of  Delray  ‐ your   constituents.  Let’s  get  this  mixture  of  retail, office, and  residential  space  right  so  that  we  can  enjoy  it  for  many   generations.  Finally, let’s  please  also  consider  improving  our  entire  process  of  planning  and  zoning  and  the  granting  of   conditional  use  so  that  it  makes  sense, so  that  it  provides  for  public  input, so  that  it  supports  sustainability, so   that  it’s  transparent, and  so  that  we, the  citizens  of  Delray  Beach, do  not  feel  that  something  is  being   railroaded  down  our  throats  as  we  have  with  meetings  scheduled  when  many  people  are  gone  and  voting   occurring  close  to  midnight.  The  developer  has  had  much  time  to  develop  a  comprehensive  plan  acceptable  to  the  City  and  its  citizens  over   the  course  of  the  past  few  years  and  has  failed  to  do  so.  We  should  take  the  time  to  get  this  right.  I  would   hate  to  think  that  we  will  end  up  with  something  similar  to  those  projects  that  you  can  see  on  busy  roads  in   other  parts  of  South  Florida  that  have  failed  to  be  integrated  into  the  fiber  of  the  community.  Respectfully  submitted,    Arlen  D. Dominek   50  East  Road, 2G   Delray  Beach, Florida   33483     1 Wynn, Kimberly From:louiloui1 <louiloui1@bellsouth.net> Sent:Friday, November 02, 2012 2:23 PM To:Nubin, Chevelle; Carney, Tom; Frankel, A dam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; McDuffie, Woodie; louiloui1@bellsouth.net Subject:Atlantic Plaza II Dear Sirs and Madams: My name is Mary Lou McAllister, and I live at Bar Terrace, 50 East Road, Apt. 1B. My concern is what is going to happen across the Intracoastal Waterway by the Atlantic Plaza II de velopment. I do not understand why the City ignores its own limits on height and density. I al so do not understand why the Commissioners have decided to call a meeting of this importance on Election Night. This issue and its ramificatio ns on our neighborhood are far too important not to provide a meeting date that will encourage full participation from the neighborhood. Mary Lou McAllister 410.310.4765 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Adrienne Kaye <adrienneck@me.com> Sent:Monday, November 05, 2012 8:28 AM To:Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam Cc:Gray, Angeleta; jacquet@my delraybeacj.com; McDuffie, Woodie; Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Concerned residents..Atlantic plaza We are residents of delray beach and are writing to you to express our concern about the proposed Atlantic Plaza project. Firstly, We are voicing opposition to this meeting being held on election ni ght. This is too important an issue to be on a night when many people wi ll be busy with election results. Secondly, our neighborhood has to be protected from the tr affic nightmare that this proposed project will create. It is already nearly impossible to navigate Atlantic avenue , ev en off season. Imagine the snarls and inability to handle this traffic in season! Finally, the number of rental units being proposed exceeds the original plan and will create and add to existing traffic situations in east delray. Many people out of the area already expr ess concern about dining and shopping in delray beach because of the crowds and traffic that already exist. This project will only turn thi s charming town into a place that will become unappealable to many looking to visit and live here. Thank you. We hope you take this issue seriously and put it on the agenda on a night that the town can really express its concern. Thank you Adrienne and Alan kaye 50 east road 265-0095 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Dorothy Chiesa <dorothy.chiesa1@earthlink.net> Sent:Friday, November 02, 2012 12:00 PM To:Gray, Angeleta Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza We need to support our shops and restaurants and some new housing which is already spring up all along Federal can help. But thats enough. We dont need more new residents - we need VISITORS -a steady and continuing stream of them. And VISITORS dont require housing. They need PARKING - I hear complaints all the time from people who come less and less now that its become harder and harder to park. And dont mention Valets. A car needs a space regardless who parks it. Terrific Events are Planned to attract pe ople - but where will you put them? They wontt come if they are annoyed by lack of parking. Do not approve the Atlantic Plaza revised plan. Mo re than 200 units and only 30 parking spaces- how could anyone approve something so insulting. This is not just about Atalntic Plaza - and the developers will sell you anything they c an in their own interest. Its your jo b to see to it that the best interest of our village by the s ea is being served. Thats what attracts people to us. Donts strangle it with traffic and not enough parking to boot. Thats the death toll for any town. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Chris Davey <cmdavey@aol.com> Sent:Friday, November 02, 2012 12:01 PM To:Gray, Angeleta Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza II Dear Commissioner Gray, I am writing to state my opposition to the revised proposal for At lantic Plaza II. I have been a resident of "Downtown" Delray Beach for 5+ years and moved here because of the "Village By The Sea" charm that is so different than all the other South Florida communities. As an interested resident, and a person who has worked in the real estate field for the past 18 years, I oppose the revised plan for the following reasons: 1. The expansion to 50+ residential units/acre is far, far t oo high. I live in Mallory Squar e where the residential density i s approximately 22 units/acre. The density of The Meridian (across the street and on Federal Highway northbound just 3 blocks south of Atlantic Avenue) is 30 units/acre. The density of 30 residential units/acre, PLUS office space, PLUS retail space, PLUS restaurant space is MORE than adequate for this site. 2. The developer's plan to have 312 residential and workforce re ntal units, plus 130 condominium units, is not in the best interest of the City. Homeowners are in the best interest of the City and undoubtedly ma ke for a more stable resident base than do transient renters. As a real estate professional , I am sure that gaining approval for the rental units, and the higher density, makes it much easier for the developers to finan ce the project. However, the City and it's residents should not be bending over backwards to cut a deal that is in the dev eloper's interest and not in t he City's. If the developers can't finance and build the project as condominiums, and as approved, let them sell it to someone who will. Believe me, there will be people willing to take over the project, but the pric e they are willing to pay may not be what the developers want. However, that is hardly the pr oblem of the City, or its residents. 3. There is nowhere near enough parking provided for a resident ial/office/retail/restaurant complex of this size. Having been involved in the approval and design of large commercial and mixed use projects in the past, let me say that the whole idea of "transitional" parking is a theory without merit. The parking assumptions are just that, assumptions. Hard data, and proven calculations would state that much, much more parking is nece ssary for a complex of this size and mix. It seems to me that the developer came up with a plan to build and then employed a "theory" and "low-balled" numbers to justify the amount of parking that could be prov ided at the site. What I find unbelievable is that the City Planners seem to agree with the developers as if the parking "plan" is based upon pr oven historical data and facts instead of "theory". We do not need the most important and valuable pi ece of real estate developed in the City, in a generation (at least), built based upon a parking "theory". This project nee ds adequate parking and the last thing we need in Downtown Delray is more valet parking to make up for inadequate and improper planning. 4. Allowing underground parking so close to a tidal body of wa ter is another "theory". The parking that is below grade will probably be unusable at some point in the future. It is my understanding that the developer s have not been able to give ANY examples of parking being constructed as planned, in Sout h Florida, so close to a tidal body of water. Personally, I would not want just one example, I think there should be m any, as we want something t hat is proven, not another theory. I understand why the developers want this parking below grade as it is the only way to fit even the inadequate amount of parking they plan to provide on the site. Mo ving the parking to grade level would require either a taller structure, or a larger footprint. Elimi nating the parking below grade would require a reduction in some aspect of the plan, be it residential units, office space, retail space, or restauran t space. The below grade parking is just another example of skewed calculations and theories being used in order to just ify an outcome. If building parking below grade is so easy and a good idea, why didn't the City do it when they built their parking garages on NE 2nd Ave. and SE 1st Ave.? Those structures were not less than 150 feet from the intracoastal waterway, like the one the developers plan on building. 5. City residents were not informed or brought into th e process about these radical changes to an already approved plan. The plan that has currently been approved was review ed and approved with public input and a significant amount of review by the City several years ago. To rush through extens ive changes is the opposite of what the citizens want. In my opinion, the Planning and Zoning Board behaved in a disgrace ful manner by approving this plan while having so many 2 unanswered questions. The fact that the plan was voted on at almost midnight when most residents had left the meeting is certainly a "black eye" for that Board. It seemed like a ma jority of the Board had many questions but were "kicking the can down the road" by saying that these issues could be addressed later, by the City Commission. Isn't it the job of the Planning and Zoning Board to get the answers and require changes BEFORE they approve something rather than approving it and saying issues like parking, height, traffic, et c. can be addressed later? City government is supposed to act on behalf of the citizens and in the best interests of the co mmunity and the citizens. So far, the actions of some of our appointed officials (employees of the city and the appointed memb ers of the Planning and Zoning Board) do not meet that threshold. Hopefully our elected officials will do better. Please rest assured that I will attend the City Commission me eting on this matter. I hope I can count on your vote to oppose this revised plan. I have voted in every election for the past 29 years and do not believe I have missed one partisan or non-partisan election. Most of the time I abhor people who are "one issue" voters. However, on this issue I will certainly be a one issue voter. If you oppose this plan I w ill certainly be grateful. However, if you support this plan you can certainly count on my opposition to your future candidacy no matter what office you decide to seek in the future. Thank you, in advance, for you consideration of my views, Christopher Davey 319 E. Mallory Circle Delray Beach, FL 33483 Tel: 561-865-5186 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Dorothy Chiesa <dorothy.chiesa1@earthlink.net> Sent:Friday, November 02, 2012 12:10 PM To:Jacquet, Al Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:Atlantic Plaza We need to support our shops and restaurants - and some addi tional housing will help - but thats already going on up and down Federal - We do not need new residents - we need VISITORS - a steady and continuing stream of them year after year after year! VISITORS need PARKING not housing. I hear complaints from people who are coming less and less as parking has b ecome harder and harder. We can't affoard to lose VISITORS You plan terrific Events to attract them and then no place to put them when they come. And dont mention Valet. A car needs a space no matter who parks it. Do not approve the recvised plan for Atlantic Plaza. 242 new units with 30 new parking spaces? What were they smoking when them approved? This is not just about Atlantic Placa. Its about our beautiful village by the sea. Thats why people love to visit us. Dont strantgle it with traffic and not enough parking to boot. Thats the death toll for any town. The developers have their own interest at heart and our lovely v illage by the sea is not one of t hem - except as it serves their wants (greed) . Its not your job to cater to them - Its your job to protect the best interests for now and the future o f Delray Beach. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Dorothy Chiesa <dorothy.chiesa1@earthlink.net> Sent:Friday, November 02, 2012 12:20 PM To:wmcduffie@myfelraybeach.com Cc:Nubin, Chevelle Subject:atlantic plaza We need to support our shops and Restaurants and some new housing can help - but there is already enough of tha happening just up and down Federal. We do not need still more new residents - we need VISITORS - a continuing and steady stream of them year after year after year. VISITORS dont require housing - they require PARKING. I more frequently hear now from people who come less and less as parking becomes harder and harder. Dont mention Vale ts. A car needs a space regardless of who parks it. And the new golf carts?? ~Cute. But certainly not going to releive any significant volume. Terrific events are planned to attract people - but if they'r e annoyed by lack of parking?? How long will it be before they just stop coming. Dont approve the Atlantic Plaza revised plan. 242 new units and 30 parking. What were they smoking when they approved? This is not just about Atlantic Plaza - its about our beautifu l village by the sea. Thats why they come. If you spoil our character by strangling us in traffic with no parking to boo t.- why would they bother. Thats the death toll for any town. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Nubin, Chevelle Sent:Thursday, November 08, 2012 4:45 PM To:Wynn, Kimberly Subject:FW: Atlantic Plaza II FYI.    Chevelle D. Nubin, MMC   City Clerk   City of Delray Beach FACC Southeast District Director   100 N.W. 1st Avenue   Delray Beach, Florida 33444   561-243-7051     From: ebetta@comcast.net [mailto:ebetta@comcast.net ] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:56 AM To: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Fwd: Atlantic Plaza II I misspoke. It's the corner of Atlantic and Federal Highway North. From: ebetta@comcast.net To: frankel@mydelraybeach.com Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2012 9:42:32 AM Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Dear Mr. Frankel, My name is Emma Betta. I am President of t he Board of Barr Terrace Condominiums, located at East Road and Atlantic Avenue. I am a permanent re sident of Delray Beach, and I vote in Delray Beach. As so many of my neighbors already have, I am vo icing my opposition to granting a variance to the developers of Atlantic Plaz a II. My reasons for such objection lie in the issues of increased density and compatibility. Increasing the number of residential units from 30 per acre, to 50 or so per acre can only cause even more severe traffic congestion. As it is, even out of season, there are times when getting down Atlantic avenue in a reasonable amount of time is vi rtually impossible. In season, we can wait for as many as 10 minutes to make a turn into our building's driveway. People already take alternative routes to get where they need to go, avoiding Atlantic Avenue. As a resident nearby, you must be aware of the backup t hat the opening of the bri dge on Atlantic Avenue causes as it is now. The amount of additional tra ffic, caused by severely increas ed density, will only exacerbate an existing problem. Please understand that I am not opposed to develop ment. The corner of Atlantic and Federal Highway South needs development. I think that your plans for a new tennis center are excellent, although I can't imagine the problems that the proposed variance for Atlantic Plaza II and the ensuing 2 gridlock could cause, in terms of access to that center from t he east. I am simply opposed to development that does not take into consideration the massive problems it will cause. The original plans for Atlantic Plaza II we re not excessive, and I'm not quite sure why the City would even consider deviating from the devel opment regulations now in place. I sincerely thank you for postponing the Commissi oners meeting until the 13th. Thank you for listening to all of us. I hope you c ontinue to listen. Should you run for office opposed in March, I wish you all good fortune. Most Sincerely, Emma Betta 50 East Road Unit 7E Delray Beach, FL 33483 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Nubin, Chevelle Sent:Friday, November 09, 2012 4:17 PM To:Wynn, Kimberly Subject:FW: Atlantic Plaza II Development Project Fyi.    Chevelle D. Nubin, MMC   City Clerk   City of Delray Beach FACC Southeast District Director   100 N.W. 1st Avenue   Delray Beach, Florida 33444   561-243-7051     From: Joan Korostoff [mailto:joanekorostoff@yahoo.com ] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 3:19 PM To: Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; McDuffie, Woodie Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Development Project Dear Mayor and Commissione rs of Delray Beach: I have participated in a number of community focus groups regarding the deve lopment of this parcel of land. I am against the current propos al for the following reasons: 1. The planned density exceeds the city's current codes. 2. Increased tax revenues do not outweigh my desire to maintain our reputation as a "village by the sea." 3. The developer has not explained what type of jobs will be created or where they will be located. 4. The impact on traffic, parking and public safety has not been sa tisfactually addressed. Please discuss these areas of concern at you upcoming meeting on November 13, 2012. Sincerely, Joan Korostoff 50 East Road Unit 12 B Dedray Beach, Fl 33483 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Nancy Reagan <nancy@nancyreagansblog.com> Sent:Sunday, November 11, 2012 1:08 PM To:McDuffie, Woodie; Carney, Tom; Frankel , Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; CityClerk@MyDelrayBeach.com Subject:Atlantic Plaza Project Hello, I don’t need to tell you that I had a sp a (N. Reagan Spa) in Atlantic Plaza for years (since 1998) and waited, and waited and waited for the plaza to be rebuilt and revitalized. Years and years went by with tenants unable to make it, empty storefronts, and unkempt landscape. Every time a plan was suggested, there was either not enough development money, nor were the developments plans feasible. Now there is a great chance to make this old, tire d plaza into a vital and integral part of Atlantic Avenue. Just im agine what it would be like to have this area once again booming. Yes, th ere will be issues wi th traffic, but you can plan for that as you have done in other areas of the downtown Delray. Please consider this p lan to redevelop the area —for the future of the tenants in Atlantic Plaza and for the east block area of Atlantic Avenue. T he area is a gold mine for Atlantic Avenue. Sincerely, Nancy Reagan Bella Reina Spa 561-404-7670 www.BellaReinaSpa.com 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:benbaffer@aol.com Sent:Sunday, November 11, 2012 2:14 PM To:McDuffie, Woodie; Carney, Tom; Frankel , Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al; CityClerk@MyDelrayBeach.com Subject:Atlantic Plaza II Dear Trusted Commissioners: I urge you to vote favorably on the Atlantic Plaza II Redevelop ment Project. The city needs this project. East Atlantic Avenue needs this project. And our beach community needs this project. As a longtime Delray Beach family heavily involved with the Seagate neighborhood, we have witnessed the incredible transf ormation of downtown Delray Beach from forgotten blight into one of the most vibrant, energetic, de sirable, and successful cities in the country. Our city has been so successful that communities from all over the world come here to try to figure out how we did it. However, this didn't just happen by chance. It took tremendous leaders hip, vision, and courage by public officials and private stakeholders every step of the way. And in order for our success to be sustainable, our city needs to continue to grow. A project like Atlantic Plaza II doesn't come along often. It takes years of work, investment, and commitment from numerous entities to get to this point. These types of projects ar e few and far between, especially in an economy that is still struggling to gain traction. Please do not pass on this opportunity. I totally respect the opinions of my friends and neighbors who oppose this project. It reinforces how deeply the residents of Delray Beach care about their community. Atlantic Plaza II is a large project, and large projects by nature are intimidating. However, properly designed and managed, t he impact on the community can be extremely positive. The development team and city staff have exhau stively studied the impact of this project, and continue to listen to the concerns of the community to ensure that Atlantic Plaz a II will be a huge benefit to the City and the East Atlantic Avenue community. Similarly, people often resi st change when they are satisfied with t he status quo. Unfortunately, if we choose to accept the status quo and fail to maintain econom ic growth, we will not sustain the success that we have been building over the last two decades. Now is the time for leadership, vision, and courage. I urge you to vote favorably on the Atlantic Plaza II Redevelopment project. Sincerely, Benjamin J. Baffer 924 Seagate Drive 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Smith, Douglas Sent:Monday, November 12, 2012 11:13 AM To:Dorling, Paul; Agenda Coordinator Subject:FW: Atlantic Plaza II FYI     Doug Smith   Assistant City Manager   City of Delray Beach   100 NW 1st Avenue   Delray Beach, FL 33444   Phone: (561) 243-7144   Fax: (561) 243-7199   Email: smithd@mydelraybeach.com   Web: www.mydelraybeach.com Follow CityDelrayBeach on Twitter   From: Mike Cruz [mailto:cruzermon@gmail.com ] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 9:04 AM To: McDuffie, Woodie; Carney, Tom; Frankel, Adam; Gray, Angeleta; Jacquet, Al Cc: CityManager@MyDelrayBeach.com ; AsstCityMgr@MyDelrayBeach.com ; ACMSmith@MyDelrayBeach.com Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Dear Mayor and City Commissioners, I am a 21-year resident of Delray Beach. I have seen the city transform into what it is today, and in general, I am very happy with the progress. I am very concerne d, however, with the amount of residential units being proposed for the Atlantic Plaza II project. 442 residences is just too many. Downtown won't be able to cope with this many more people living in such a confined area; the ease of access of ev erything we are accustomed to using, will no longer be easy. The "charm" of our great city is di sappearing. All the hard work of th e past 25 years can be ruined by poor decisions made now. Please decide to limit the residences to the original number of 197. Adding more rental units just allows for more transient residents, whic h we already know we don't want in Delray. We want permanent residents/owners. You do not need to cater to all of th e requests of the developer. They ar e not going anywhere else; they own 9 acres of land they spent years ac quiring. They want to be here. Thank you, Mike and Karen Cruz 1510 N. Swinton Ave. 561-350-7360 RALF BROOKES ATTORNEY Board Certified in City County and Local Government Law City of Delray Beach Re: Atl antic Plaza II - Public Hearing November 13, 2012 Dear City of Delray Beach: I represent numerous adjoining and nearby property owners to the proposed project including John Papaloizos at 50 East Rd.8H, Delray Beach Fl . 33483 who will be affected by the increase in traffic, insufficient parking, incompatible uses, density, mass, scale, height of proposed buildings . My clients o bject to the request to :  exceed a height of 48 feet (59’ 4” proposed);  increase the residential density of the project from 30 units dwelling units per acre to 51.10 proposed dwelling units per acre for total of 442 proposed dwelling units ; and  traff ic, parking and transportation impact of vehicles on the residential neighborhood Please consider our objections to Atl antic Plaza II because the project as proposed is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan an d is not in compliance with City Land Development Code including Section 2.4.5(E)(5): (5) Findings : In addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the City Commission must make findings that establishing the conditional use will not: (a) Have a significantly detrimental effect upon the stability of the neighborhood within which it will be located. Section 4.3.4(J)(4)(b)(iv)(3) “That open areas, such as courtyards, plazas, and landscaped setbacks , be provided in order to add interest and provide relief from the building mass.” Section 4 .4.13(I) Central Business (CBD) District : (A) Purpose and Intent : The Central Business District (CBD) Zone District is established in order to preserve and protect the cultural and historic aspects of downtown Delray Beach and simultaneously provide for the stimulation and enhancement of the vitality and economic growth of this special area. Central Core: The regulations are intended to result in development that preserves the downtown’s historic moderate scale , while promoting a balanced mix of uses that will help the area evolve into a traditional, self -sufficient downtown. Section 3.2.3 (D) : “The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhoo d. lf it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhoo d, the project shall not be permi tted .” Section 3.2.3 (E) “Development of vacant land which is zoned for reside ntial purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations.” Section 3.2.3 (I)(1) : “Performance Standards These standards shall apply to all applications for new development and modification of existing developments which would result in a density greater than thirty (30) dwelling units per acre in the Commercial Core …. (1)…Notwithstanding the above, the approving body may deny an application for increased density where it is dete rmined that the proposed project is not compatible in terms of building mass and intensity of use with surrounding development .” Comprehensive Plan Future Land use Element , Objective C -3 “The Central Business District (CBD) and surrounding neighborhoods, including A -1 -A, Seacrest and Swinton Avenue represents the essence of what is Delray Beach i.e. a "village by the sea". The continued revitalization of the CBD is essential to achieving the overall theme of the City's Comprehensive Plan by managing growth and preserving the charm. The following policies and activities shall be pursued in the achievement of this objective” P olicy C -3.2 : “Downtown Delray Beach Master Plan represents the citizen’s vision for the growth and unification of Delr ay Beach, while still retaining the village like community by -the -sea character of the CBD...Future development in this area shall be consistent with the Master Plan.” Transportation Element Objective A -2 : “The traffic circulation system, and improvements thereto, shall be coordinated with new development as depicted on the Future Land Use Map in order … provide for adequate and safe access …” Transportation Element Goal "B" : “T he maintenance and enhancement of the city's existing quality of life shall b e complimented by a convenient, safe and efficient street system which maintai ns an optimal level of service. T he system shall keep the local trafficways of Delray Beach uncongested , thus retaining one of the unique attributes of the Delray B each quality of life and providing an environment which is safe for the diversity of travel habits which are exhibited by Delray B each residents.” Transportation Element Goal "C " : “A convenient, safe and efficient transportation n etwork which emphasizes safety and which meets the needs of residents, both year -round and seasonal, shall be created. Its focus shall be u pon avoiding congestion and accommodating all f orms of travel throughout the city.” Downtown Master P lan: "Preserve the Character of the City: The City of Delray Beach is a good place to live, shop, work, and relax. It possesses small town attributes, great physical structure and charm. It is important to preserve these qualities... “Introduction, page 1 “Encourage devel opment without displacement at an appropriate scale : Encourage development fronting long Atlantic Avenue, with three stories as ideal height and four stories being the maximum desired height." Introduction , page 1 Goal and Objective - "To create building forms of a character and scale that reinforces the Citizens' vision of a 'City of urban amenities with a small town feeling .' " Project (Master Plan) Goal and Objectives , (Page 4) Citizen Testimony : Citizen testimony regarding com patibility is permissible and constitutes substantial competent evidence, so long as it is fact -based. Mere generalized statements of opposition are to be disregarded, but fact -based neighborhood testimony regarding compatibility is competent substantial e vidence . Metropolitan Dade County v. Blumenthal 675 S.2d 598 (Fla. Dist. App. 3d 1996). Conclusion: The “approving body may deny an application for increased density where it is determined that the proposed project is not compatible in terms of building mass and intensity of use with surrounding development ” under Section 3.2.3 (I)(1) of the Land Development Regulation s , and must deny a conditional use that will have “a significantly detrimental effect upon the stability of the neighborhood ” unde r Secti on 2.4.5(E)(5)(Conditional Use). Please make a motion to DENY the proposed Conditional Use as set forth in the staff report, Alternative A ction “C”. Staff Report page 3 . Sincerely Ralf Brookes Attorney Ralf Brookes Attorney Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law by The Florida Bar 1217 E Cape Coral Parkway #107 Cape Coral Florida 33904 1 R A L F B R O O K E S, A T T O R N E Y Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law MEMORANDUM OF LAW FROM: Ralf Brookes Attorney Date: N ovember 9, 2012 Issue: Can an application for a Conditional Use be denied? Answer: YES , An application for a conditional use should be denied if “c ompetent, substantial evidence ”1 introduced at the pu blic hearing indicates that the conditional use application : (1) does not meet the intent of the zoning district in the LDC , (2) fails meets any of the criteria listed in the LDC , or (3) is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan 2 . C itizen testimony in a zoning compatibility is permissible and constitutes substantial competent evidence, so long as it is fact -based. Mere generalize d statements of opposition are to be disregarded, but fact -based testimony is competent substantial evidence on a conditional use . Metropolitan Dade County v. Blumenthal 675 S.2d 598 (Fla. Dist. App. 3d 1996). In Blumenthal , the lay testimony went to the incompatibility of the proposed development wi th the surrounding uses , was found to be sufficient, based on essentially undisputed facts in the record about the adjacent existing development and existing zoning around the subject site. The c ompetent substantial evidence in the Blu menthal opinion included maps of exi sting uses i ntroduced by the lay witness and a county planning map of the general area. S ubsequent cases have appl ied the Blumenthal principle to citizen testimony and oth er evidence in differe nt settings, further explaining the standard : Miami -Dade County v. Walberg, 739 So. 2d 115 (Fla. App., 1999) at 116, 117 (finding neighbors' testimony and site plan, existing uses map to constitute substantial competent evidence upon which to uphold the denial of the zoning application); 1 De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 S.2d 912, 916 (Fla. 1957). 2 A ll deve lopment must be consistent with the duly adopted comprehensive plan . See §163.3215 Florida Statutes. Pinecrest Lakes, Inc. v. S hidel, 795 So.2d 191 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), rehearing denied,802 So.2d 486 petition for review denied 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1260 (Fla. 2001). 2 Metro. Dade County v. Sec. 11 Prop. Corp., 719 S.2d 1204, 1205 (Fla. Dist. App. 3d 1998), rev. denied , 735 S.2d 1287 (Fla. 1999) (upholding the county commission's denial of a special exception for a mini self -stora ge facility, based on lay testimony on incompatibility , plus documentary evidence of record, including a proposed site plan, elevation drawings, and an aerial photograph introduced by the applicant); and Metro. Dade County v. Sportacres Dev. Group, Inc., 698 S.2d 281, 282 (Fla. Dist. App. 3d 1997) (approving the county commission's denial of a zoning application based in part on lay testimony that the proposed development would be incompatible with the existing adjacent community , bolstered by maps and other z oning records). Conclusion : A denial of a conditional use application can be sustained where “competent, substantial evidence” introduced at the public hearing indicates that the conditional use application : (1) does not meet the intent of the zoning district as stated in the LDC, (2) fails meets any of the criteria listed in the LDC , or (3) is not consiste nt with the Comprehensive Plan. Failure to demonstrate compliance with the LDC (intent of the zoning districts and conditional use general criteria), consistency with the Comprehensive Plan are sufficient grounds for deni al. Ralf Brookes Attorney 1217 E Cape Coral Parkway #107 Cape Coral Fl 33904 (239) 910 -5464 Ralf@RalfBrookesAttorney.com 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Nubin, Chevelle Sent:Monday, November 12, 2012 12:42 PM To:Wynn, Kimberly Subject:FW: Atlantic Plaza II FYI.    Chevelle D. Nubin, MMC   City Clerk   City of Delray Beach FACC Southeast District Director   100 N.W. 1st Avenue   Delray Beach, Florida 33444   561-243-7051     From: ebetta@comcast.net [mailto:ebetta@comcast.net ] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 8:26 AM To: carneyfordelray@gmail.com Cc: Nubin, Chevelle Subject: Atlantic Plaza II Dear Mr. Carney, A concerned neighbor forwarded me your thoughtful message, regarding the development of Atlantic Plaza II. I thank you for your willingness to listen to the voters. I have lived in Delray Beach for a number of year s and love the city. On the one hand, I am certainly in favor of any development that will augment the existing charm and ambiance of Delray Beach. On the other, I do not think the proposed development of Atlantic Plaza II will serve as an enhancement but, rather, will cause a negative impact on the city for a variety of reasons. First, the gridlock the the addition of automobiles of renters of the propos ed residential units will cause conjures an awesome picture. As it is now , the opening of the Intracoa stal bridge on Atlantic Avenue incurs backups for blocks on Atlantic Avenue, as well as on the side streets, such as 7th. At a meeting last Thursday evening, the developer's representative stated that residents of Atlantic Plaza II would probably walk or ride their bicycl es. I do not think it wise to plan, based upon presumptions. Residents of Atlantic Plaza II will, at the very least, have to get to work and back home again. The proposed offices and retail spaces will also br ing more traffic into an d out of the city. The notion that, no matter what traffi c study has been performed for the developer, a drastic increase in density will not cause an equal ly drastic increase in vehicular traffic defies common sense and logic and gives one pause for thought about rami fications such as life-safety issues. Does anyone want to presume that ambulances, fire en gines, etc. will not have a more difficult time reaching their destinations in a timely manner? Then, the design of the proposed At lantic Plaza II, although aesthetic ally pleasing on paper and out o f context, is in no way compatible with the surrounding nei ghborhoods. There is nothing in the area even nearing the scale of the pro posed project. The surrounding communi ties, such as those in the Marina District and on 7th, are compri sed primarily of single-family hom es and small rental apartment 2 buildings. These two, only examples of others near by, are quiet, residential ne ighborhoods. Granting the variance requested by the developers of Atlant ic Plaza II will change the character of the area, making it crowded, noisy. Finally, I ask the commissioners to look to the fu ture. Do we want to cater to the economic exigencies of a developer today to pay the price fo r density and incompatibility tomorrow? I would hope not. I encourage you to deny the requested variance, to require the developer to stick to the already approved plans that are in accordance with the vision of Delray that our city government has wisely fostered for years. Thank you for your consideration. Emma O. Betta 50 East Road 7E Delray Beach, FL 33483 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Nubin, Chevelle Sent:Monday, November 12, 2012 12:43 PM To:Wynn, Kimberly Subject:FW: Atlantic Plaza FYI.    Chevelle D. Nubin, MMC   City Clerk   City of Delray Beach FACC Southeast District Director   100 N.W. 1st Avenue   Delray Beach, Florida 33444   561-243-7051     From: N Ramachandran [mailto:nkrama1@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 8:50 AM To: Vice-Mayor Tom Carney Cc: ebetta@comcast.net; frankle@mydelraybeach.com; Nubin, Chevelle; Gray, Angeleta; jacqet@mydelraybeach.com; McDuffie, Woodie Subject: Re: Atlantic Plaza Dear Mr.Carney, I was going to express my opinion about Atlantic Plaza redevelopment pro j ect on Tuesday at the meeting.I was very involved with the 2008 plan as a concerned resident. Before drafting the 2008 plan, owner and the project planers called the community for ideas about incorporating the Veterans park in to the plan by the suggestion of Mayer and the commissioners. We had several town hall type meetings for ideas and came out with a beautiful design to incorporate Veterans park to the master-plan.the builders and the owner worked with us in planing.That was the first step.This took few months. Then we had several meetings with the builders and the owner for the depth and the height discussion.In all these meetings there were at least one or two commissioner's and most of the time the Mayer also came to observe. After all these planing only the next step was taken to approve the project.I feel that was the way we should have approached this project.The Mayer took such keen interest in this project to make sure this project blend in beautifully to give a special lift to the beauty and the unique quality to Delray beach. This is not a small thing to rush through without serious discussion and planing. Veteran's park has over three acres of land with the inter coastal water on one side that the city owns.This park is a unique feature in our city.We use this park for several activities,has a beautiful children's playground,city gets revenue from the tour boats,people conduct weddings have morning yoga classes outside and so on. With out incorporating this park in the plan it will be a huge mistake to take some money for it and walk away. This new project without incorporating the park will look so out of place and the park will never be used the same way.I hope you all will think about this also with all the other concerns.Thank you.Nalini Ramachandran. 2 F rom: Vice-Mayor Tom Carney <carneyfordelray@gm. ail.com> To: nkrama1@yahoo.com Sent: Sun, November 11, 2012 7:02:59 PM Subject: Atlantic Plaza If you are having trouble viewing this message, see it in your browser . Dear Friends: On Tuesday, the City Commission will be voting on t he proposed Atlantic Plaza r edevelopment project. Private investment in Delray Beach is im portant for our City to continue to thri ve. New development projects need to be b don’t disrupt the quality of life of resident s or change the look and feel of current neighborhoods. This is important to me a principle in my decision making. Regarding the Atlantic Plaza redevelopment project, I have made it a priority to meet with community leaders and attend n meetings to better educate myself on the issue and learn more about the concerns of residents. By law I am prohibited from stating my position or how I will vote on an issue prior to it coming to the Commission. Never t learning all I can about this project and listening to the concerns of residents so I can make a responsible and informed d e Please feel free to contact me at Tom@ThomasCarney.com to share with me your thoughts on the Atlantic Plaza Redev e hear from you on this important issue. Thank you. Tom Carney You can watch the City Commission m eeting this Tuesday at City Hall or online at your convenience. City Commission Workshop Tuesday, November 13 6:00 pm City Hall Commission Chambers 100 NW 1st Avenue 3 Watch the Workshop online: http://clicks.electionemail.com/tr kr/?c=20456&g=61&u=901a16c495e84878bf557446 fd3a02a5&p=c2594fd55562cb6045d 0 facebook" title= Paid by Tom Carney for Delray Beach Mayor This message sent to nkrama1@yahoo.com by carneyfordelray@gmail.com Tom Carney for Mayor 455 NE 5th Avenue Suite D-211 Delray Beach, FL 33483 You opted in to this list from: Quick Add (More info ) Unsubscribe | ManageURL | Forward to a Friend MEMORANDUM TO:Mayor and City Commissioners FROM:David T. Harden, City Manager DATE:November 9, 2012 SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM WS.1 - SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2012 PROPOSED PARTNERSHIP WITH THE YMCA OF SOUTH PALM BE ACH COUNTY ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Attached is a conceptual outline for partnering wit h the YMCA for development and operation of the Family Fun and Fitness Center as a YMCA on the nort hwest corner of Lake Ida Road and Congress Avenue. BACKGROUND City staff have met several times with representati ves of the South Palm Beach County YMCA to explore how we might work together to develop a rec reational facility on our property at Lake Ida Road and Congress. As a result of these discussions the YMCA wrote a conceptual outline of how such a partnership might work. We have also spoken with s ome other cities which have such partnerships to ensure the idea was workable. The proposal as shown on the conceptual site plan i s to move the lawn bowling and shuffleboard courts from Veteran's Park to this site. These courts and some meeting rooms would be accessible to City residents on the same basis as in other City owned facilities without them being members of the YMCA. The details of this access would be spelled out in a formal agreement. The City would build and own the facility. The YMC A could either pay us rent or put money into a renewal and replacement reserve. The City would ha ve no operating costs associated with the facilitie s or the recreational programs offered there. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the staff be authorized to begin work on drafting a formal partnership agreement for construction and operation of a community recre ational facility to be operated as a YMCA on the City's property at Lake Ida and Congress. CI T Y O F D E L R A Y B E A C H AN D Y M C A O F S O U T H P A L M BE A C H C O U N T Y BE A C H C O U N T Y PA R T N E R S H I P PR O P O S A L WH O A R E W E ? • Th e Y i s a c h a r i t y t h a t i s a v i t a l p a r t o f t h e c o m m u n i t y . • Th e Y i s a w e l c o m i n g p l a c e t o l e a r n n e w s k i l l s a n d co n n e c t w i t h o t h e r s . • Th e Y e n r i c h e s t h e w e l l - b e i n g o f p e o p l e o f a l l a g e s a n d wa l k s o f l i f e . wa l k s o f l i f e . • Th e Y n e v e r t u r n s a n y o n e a w a y , r e g a r d l e s s o f t h e i r a b i l i t y to p a y . 2 P a r t n e r s h i p P r o p o s a l | © 2 0 1 1 Y M C A o f t h e U S A TH E Y M C A O F S P B C • A w a r d e d m o r e t h a n $ 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 i n f i n a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e , e n a bl i n g y o u t h , f a m i l i e s an d s e n i o r s t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n Y p r o g r a m s , w h o o t h e r w i s e w o u l d b e u n a b l e t o pa r t i c i p a t e . • Co n n e c t e d m o r e t h a n 1 , 1 0 0 t e e n s a g e d 1 3 -18 y e a r s w i t h c a r i n g a d u l t r o l e • Co n n e c t e d m o r e t h a n 1 , 1 0 0 t e e n s a g e d 1 3 -18 y e a r s w i t h c a r i n g a d u l t r o l e mo d e l s i n p r o g r a m s a n d a c t i v i t i e s t h a t t e a c h l e a d e r s h i p s k i l ls a n d b u i l d s e l f - co n f i d e n c e . • S u p p o r t e d n e a r l y 6 , 0 0 0 c h i l d r e n i n q u a l i t y , v a l u e s - b a se d p r o g r a m s t h a t pr o m o t e h e a l t h y d e v e l o p m e n t . • E n g a g e d 8 0 0 v o l u n t e e r s t o l e a d a n d g u i d e t h e v i s i o n a n d m i s s i o n o f t h e YM C A . 3 | P a r t n e r s h i p P r o p o s a l | © 2 0 1 1 Y M C A o f t h e U S A OP P O R T U N I T Y • Th e Y h a s a g a p i n c o v e r a g e b e t w e e n B o y n t o n B e a c h a n d Bo c a R a t o n . • De l r a y B e a c h i s i n n e e d o f a C o m m u n i t y C e n t e r . • Pr o p o s e d p l a n w i l l m e e t t h e n e e d s o f b o t h t h e c i t y o f De l r a y B e a c h a n d t h e Y M C A . De l r a y B e a c h a n d t h e Y M C A . 4 | P a r t n e r s h i p P r o p o s a l © 2 0 1 1 Y M C A o f t h e U S A BU I L D I N G A N D L O C A T I O N • Th e C i t y w i l l b u i l d , f u r n i s h , a n d o w n a c o m p r e h e n s i v e fi t n e s s a n d r e c r e a t i o n c e n t e r o n i t s p r o p e r t y a t t h e c o r n e r of L a k e I d a R o a d a n d C o n g r e s s A v e n u e . 5 | P a r t n e r s h i p P r o p o s a l | © 2 0 1 1 Y M C A o f t h e U S A FA M I L Y F U N A N D F I T N E S S C E N T E R DE L R A Y B E A C H , F L O R I D A MA N A G E M E N T • Th e Y M C A w i l l m a n a g e a n d o p e r a t e t h e f a c i l i t y f o r 3 0 ye a r s , w i t h t h r e e 1 0 y e a r e x t e n s i o n s , a s a Y M C A me m b e r s h i p o r g a n i z a t i o n . 7 | P a r t n e r s h i p P r o p o s a l © 2 0 1 1 Y M C A o f t h e U S A CI T Y A C C E S S • Pr e f e r r e d M e m b e r s h i p r a t e s f o r D e l r a y r e s i d e n t s • Co m m u n i t y m e e t i n g s p a c e • Ch i l d r e n ’ s p l a y g r o u n d • Re l o c a t e s h u f f l e b o a r d a n d l a w n b o w l i n g 8 | P a r t n e r s h i p P r o p o s a l | © 2 0 1 1 Y M C A o f t h e U S A OP E R A T I O N S • Th e Y M C A w i l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r a l l o p e r a t i n g e x p e n s e s an d o n g o i n g c a p i t a l e x p e n s e s r e l a t e d t o t h e f a c i l i t y , in c l u d i n g p r o g r a m s , i n s u r a n c e , p e r s o n n e l , m a i n t e n a n c e an d o c c u p a n c y . 9 | P a r t n e r s h i p P r o p o s a l © 2 0 1 1 Y M C A o f t h e U S A CO M M U N I T Y B E N E F I T • Mu n i c i p a l i t i e s f r e q u e n t l y h a v e t o s u b s i d i z e t h e o n g o i n g op e r a t i o n s o f c o m m u n i t y c e n t e r s w i t h t a x d o l l a r s . • Th e p l a n r e l i e v e s D e l r a y B e a c h f r o m t h e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y a n d ex p e n s e o f o p e r a t i n g r e c r e a t i o n c e n t e r s . • Co l l a b o r a t i n g wi t h th e YM C A to bu i l d an d op e r a t e a world • Co l l a b o r a t i n g wi t h th e YM C A to bu i l d an d op e r a t e a world cl a s s f a c i l i t y p r o v i d e s D e l r a y B e a c h w i t h a f a c i l i t y t h a t i t wa n t s w i t h o u t t h e b u r d e n o f o p e r a t i n g i t . 10 | P a r t n e r s h i p P r o p o s a l | © 2 0 1 1 Y M C A o f t h e U S A • T h e Y M C A ’ s n a t i o n a l b r a n d a n d r e p u t a t i o n • Jo b s c r e a t i o n w i t h a n e s t i m a t e d p a y r o l l o f $ 2 m i l l i on , a s w e l l a s l o c a l AD D I T I O N A L B E N E F I T S • Jo b s c r e a t i o n w i t h a n e s t i m a t e d p a y r o l l o f $ 2 m i l l i on , a s w e l l a s l o c a l vo l u n t e e r i n v o l v e m e n t i n g o v e r n a n c e a n d p r o g r a m s • F i n a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e t o q u a l i f i e d a p p l i c a n t s • P a r t n e r s h i p s w i t h o t h e r n o n p r o f i t o r g a n i z a t i o n s • C o m m u n i t y s t r e n g t h e n i n g p r o g r a m s r e l a t e d t o y o u t h de v e l o p m e n t , he a l t h y l i v i n g , a n d s o c i a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y SE R V I N G A L L P O P U L A T I O N S • YM C A f a c i l i t i e s a n d p r o g r a m s s e r v e a l l p o p u l a t i o n s an d Co m m u n i t y D e m o g r a p h i c s • Ch i l d r e n pa r t i c i p a t e i n l i c e n s e d p r e s c h o o l a n d a f t e r s c h o o l programs as w e l l a s s p o r t s , a q u a t i c s , c a m p s , a n d a v a r i e t y o f o t h e r a c t i v i t i e s . • Se n i o r s ar e i n v o l v e d i n a c o m p r e h e n s i v e s c h e d u l e o f e x e r c i s e and so c i a l p r o g r a m s . • Ad u l t s en g a g e i n w e l l n e s s , s p o r t s , a n d c o m m u n i t y e n g a g e m e n t. • Fa m i l i e s ha v e a c c e s s t o a l l o f t h e a b o v e a s w e l l a s ac t i v i t i e s t h a t i n v o l v e p a r e n t s a n d c h i l d r e n t o g e t h er . 12 | P a r t n e r s h i p P r o p o s a l © 2 0 1 1 Y M C A o f t h e U S A LI T E R A C Y A N D L E A D E R S H I P Y’ s p r o v i d e p r o g r a m s f o r y o u t h & ad u l t s • Li t e r a c y an d l e a d e r s h i p d e v e l o p m e n t f o r y o u t h a n d ad u l t s • D ro w n i n g pr e v e n t i o n 13 • D ro w n i n g pr e v e n t i o n • Di a b e t e s pr e v e n t i o n • Le a r n i n g g a p ac t i v i t i e s t o m i t i g a t e th e s u m m e r l e a r n i n g g a p f o r l o w e r i n c o m e c h i l d r e n Pa r t n e r s h i p P r o p o s a l | © 2 0 1 1 Y M C A o f t h e U S A NE X T S T E P S • Fu r t h e r d e v e l o p s i t e p l a n • Fi n a l i z e O p e r a t i n g A g r e e m e n t 14 | P a r t n e r s h i p P r o p o s a l © 2 0 1 1 Y M C A o f t h e U S A TH A N K Y O U TH A N K Y O U YM C A o f S o u t h P a l m B e a c h C o u n t y 66 3 1 P a l m e t t o C i r c l e S o u t h Bo c a R a t o n , F L 3 3 4 3 3 56 1 . 3 9 5 . 9 6 2 2 MEMORANDUM TO:Mayor and City Commissioners FROM:David T. Harden, City Manager DATE:November 9, 2012 SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM WS.2 - SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2012 FINANCIAL REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS - DELRAY BEACH MEMORIAL GARDENS MUNICIPAL CEMETERY ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Attached is the Financial Review Board's report and recommendations regarding operation of the City's cemetery together with staff comments and responses . BACKGROUND A member of the Financial Review Board conducted a study of the operation of the City's cemetery. Based on this study he produced a report with recom mendations which was adopted by the Board. This report with staff comments and responses is being p resented to the Commission for your consideration. Some of the recommendations have been implemented w hile there are others with which staff disagrees. Staff from the City Clerk's Office and Parks and Recreation will be present to answer any questions the Commission may have. RECOMMENDATION The Commission may wish to give direction in some c ases where the Board and staff disagree. 1 Wynn, Kimberly From:Harden, David Sent:Friday, November 09, 2012 2:34 PM To:Wynn, Kimberly Subject:FW: FRB cemetery recommendations 4 9 2012 Attachments:201209261528.pdf; Cemeterygravelist.pdf; Cemeteryintermentrequest.pdf Please  attach  all  of  this  as  backup  for  the  cemetery  agenda  item.    From: Harden, David Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:17 PM To: CHRISTINA (christinadelray@gmail.com); Reade, Richard Cc: Nubin, Chevelle; Karch, Linda; Simmons, Tim Subject: FW: FRB cemetery recommendations 4 9 2012 Below  you  will  find  the  staff's  comments  regarding  the  Financial  Review  Boards  report  concerning  operations  of  the  City   Cemetery.    We  will  schedule  this  for  presentation  to  the  City  Commission  at  a  work  session, probably  in  November.    City of Delray Beach Financial Review Board Final Recommendations: City Cemetery April 9, 2012 BACKGROUND: The Delray Beach Memorial Gardens, originally named Pi ne Ridge Cemetery, has been part of the City of Delray Beach since the City’s inception in 1911. (Actually the cemetery star ted in 1902 when land for a cemetery was given to the Ladies Im provement Association. The Associ ation deeded it to the City in 1914) It was expanded greatly in 1995 and now covers over 38 acres and contains a mausoleum. According to information on the City’s website, record-keeping was always a challenge for the Cemetery with many early burials impossible to locate and maintenance being haphazard, leaving many families to tend to the upkeep of their own plots. (We believe our records are accurate from at least 1976, and probably from 1973.) Presently, the City Clerk’s office (561.243.7050) is re sponsible for plot sale in formation and maintaining an up-to-date database of cemete ry occupants and plot owners. A ccording to the City’s website, additional information on burial records can be obtained from the Palm Beach Genealogical Society at 561.832.3279. (The Genealogical Society has published a book entitled Delray Beach Memorial Gardens Index of Burials September 1903 – September 1987 which, among other listings, lists by block and lot the names of persons buried there and the date of their de ath. The City Clerk’s Of fice has a copy of this book.) CURRENT CEMETERY OPERATIONS ANALYSIS : Mr. Jack Hallahan, FRB Member, researched the Cemete ry operations and was informed that in January 1988 the Cemetery’s management was turned over to To tal Prearrangements, Inc. on a twenty (20) yea r contract. They were to manage sales of property and build a mausoleum. The City was to handle all o f 2 the maintenance, interments, site assignments, etc. T otal Prearrangements defaulted on the agreement. After seventeen (17) months it was given to anot her company to manage, named Prearrangements with the same functions. Under Total Prearrangements they sold property and gave deeds. Money was collected by this company during the 17 months, but there are no records. During the twenty (20) years of contracted ou tside management, City Employee Robert Johnson, the Cemetery Supervisor, “manually” kept records of who was buried and wh ere. After the operation of the Cemetery was brought back to City control, in 2008, Mr. Johnson wa s reportedly told he no longer needed to keep records, so he stopped. His records are the only ones in ex istence and now they are incomplete. (This is incorrect. When the City took back control of cemetery operations the City Clerk began keeping records in digital medi a using Pontem Cemetery Software. T he Parks Department and the City Clerk’s Office have compared their records and found that the Cler k’s office has the same records as the Parks Department either in their comp uter records or in a hard copy file.) Mr. Hallahan received a copy from Ci ty Clerk’s Office of all of the plot s that were sold and interments made over the past three (3) years. The City sold a tota l of thirty-five (35) grav esites, and there were 416 people buried. (Staff review of Fiscal Years 2009, 2010 and 2011 found 411 burials and 63 gravesites sold. See attached report.) This shows the pre-sold inventory is be ing depleted but there are no records o f the inventory. An intensive investigative method wo uld be needed to determin e who is buried where and which plots sold prior to 2008 are in use. Of the 35 plots that were sold since 2008, there are reportedly no records to show if they were used. (Information on whether plots have been used is recorded in the Pontem software. One can enter the block. lot and pl ot information in the digital record and the record will show if the plot is occupied or not.) The City charges Opening and Closing Fees yet th ere are reportedly no records showing for which plots these fees were paid and no cross-referencing of fees to plots. (Every burial is pursuant to an “Interment Request” which shows the block, lot and plot for wh ich the fees are paid. Se e the attached example.) Hence, there appears to be a lack of records show ing which plots are in use and which are vacant. (This and the preceding paragraph are incorrect. The Pontem Cemetery Software can produce a listing entitled “Delray Beach Municipal Cemetery Gr aves List”. See the attached ex ample. This list shows for every block, lot and plot the status as “Occupied”, “Sold” or “Reserved/Pre-need”. Plots which are in use are shown as “Occupied”. Vacant plots are shown as “S old” or “Reserved/Pre-need”. “Reserved/Pre-need ” means they are being paid for on a time payment plan. There is still work to be done to enter some of the information from the manual records into the software.) According to site plans of the Cemetery, there is a large drain pipe running through part of the Cemetery that reportedly rendered over 100 plots as unusable. Mr. Omar Bowra of the City Engineerin g Department deserves credit for his work in helping find the solution for the piping issue. First, he su pplied Mr. Hallahan with the design piping drawings and was requested to and then capable of superimposing the involved piping drawings on to the Cemetery Plot Plan. T his combined plan showed the 36” drain pipe appeared not to interfere with the burial sites in question. T his was later confirmed during an on-site inspection. Mr. Hallahan attempted to meet with City Empl oyee Tim Simmons to discuss and ascertain whether the 102 plots marked as unusable due to a 36” drain pipe were, indeed, usable. Mr. Simmons was not available so he met with Robert Johnson, Cemetery Supervisor, an d his immediate supervisor, Mr. Simmons’s assistant. They walked the 36” pipe and proved that there is sufficient distance from any of the plots and determined that these 102 plots could be sold and used. The City Clerk reminded Mr. Hallahan that the Ci ty Manager is the only one that has the authority to release the plots for sale. (Apparently there was some miscommunicati on on this issue. These plots have been made available for sale and no acti on by the City Manager is required.) In September, 2011, Mr. Hallahan was informed that there was to be a meeting between Parks and Recreation and the City Clerk’s Offi ce to confirm the number of grave si tes available for sale. Mr. Hallahan asked if he would be invited to atte nd that meeting and was told “No”. He was also told the meeting will not be recorded and no minutes will be taken. Mr . Hallahan has been recent ly informed by the City 3 Clerk’s office that this meeting has not been held as of this date. (Staff from the City Clerk’s Office and Parks and Recreation have met severa l times to work on merging their records. One of the outcomes o f these meetings will be a complete list of available grave sites.) Lastly, it is noted that the Annu al Income from Cemetery operatio ns is roughly $60,000 while the annual cost to operate the Cemetery is approximately $400,000. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. First and foremost, the City Clerk’s office needs to determine what plots have been presold but not yet used, the current “sold” inventory and what “sold” plots are not paid in full. Further, the total unsold inventory of plots available for sale n eeds to be ascertained and documented; (This is being worked on as staff time permits.) A suggested method of gathering this information is to include a “Notice to Residents” on the City website asking Residents to immediately contact the City Clerk’s office if they have a claim or a deed to a City cemetery plot and bring the do cumentation in for verification. T his Notice could al so be included in “News to Neighborhoods” communicati on. The Notice should also state that any outstanding balances past due must be paid within sixty (60) days of the public ation and/or notice date. All plots not fully paid by that date will be returned to the City’s inventor y and any partial payments will be forfeited without recourse and/or as permitted by law. (When the City took back administration of the Cemetery in 2008 an audit was performed to determine which cemetery lots were sold on an installment plan by Prearrangements. The Finance Depart ment put in a tremendous effort contacting those purchasers by letter and phone call. This resulted in some of the purchasers coming in to either pay in full or have the City buy back the lots. If the City was not contacted we have taken back the lots and have been selling them) After ascertaining the current status, records should be update d and computerized and processes should be set in place immediately for future sales, monitoring and inventorying of all plots plus documentation of all plot openings and closings; (This is already being done , except for entering some data from manual records into the computer record.) 2. There should only be one Cemetery Manager and that should be the City Clerk’s office. T his office is currently responsible for all cemete ry records, inventory, sales and communications rela ting to cemetery matters. The responsibility for Ce metery management (sales, records, handling all phone calls, emails and inquiries regarding the Cemetery and other administrative duties) should be handled solely by the City Clerk’s office with no involvement or oversi ght by the Parks and Recrea tion Department. It is strongly felt that having three (Two departments are involved; Pa rks and the City Clerk’s Office) separate City departments working on the Cemetery have contributed to the disorganization and lack o f accurate records. (We have accurate records since at leas t 1976, and we do not see any evidence o f disorganization.) Having one department solely responsible for the management will allow the processes and records to be stream lined and tracked more accurately; (This has been done since the City took back cemetery administration in 2008.) 3. The responsibility for physical and maintenance op erations of the Cemetery should be transferred, along with the permanent on-site personnel, to th e Public Works Department, since that Department’s Mission Statement appears more comp atible with Cemetery activities than the much larger Parks and Recreation Department’s. A copy of each of the Mission Statements is attached hereto as Attachments #1 and #2; (City staff strongly disagrees. Public Works does not do any maintenance o f turf, trees or shrubbery. On the other hand this type of work is the primary re sponsibility of the Parks Maintenance Division. When the ce metery needs extra help it is easy for Parks Maintenance to send fully qualified staff to assist. Furthermore, we l ook at the cemetery as a “park environment”.) 4. The staff member assigned to the Cemetery in the City Clerk’s office should meet regularly and as needed with the staff member a ssigned to oversee the Cemetery operation in the Public Works Department in order to facilitate open lines of communication between Management and the physical and maintenance operations of the Cemetery in order to avoid future misunderstandings; (There is 4 ongoing communication between th e Clerk’s Office and Parks and Recreation staff regarding the cemetery.) 5. Attached is a listing of adult burial costs for Delray Beach an d the neighboring city-owned and operated cemeteries for in-ground burials. This is Attachment #3. It is noted that Boca Raton reported having only one price as their experience has shown that getting around the non-resident classification is easily accomplishe d. Boca also charges a one-time Perpetual Care fee for all in-ground burials, in addition to the other normal and customary costs, a fee Delray Beach should also strongly consider charging. (Increases to cemetery fees were appr oved by the Commission on September 20.) Boynton Beach advised that they just moved th eir Cemetery operation to the Public Works Department from Parks and Recreation. (Boynton Beach has their enti re Parks Maintenance function under Public Works, which is the way some cities organize themse lves. In my experience, having Parks Maintenance in a different department leads to coordination problems and conflicts between park maintenance activities and park use activities.) T his has nothing to do with our same recommendation, which has been discussed for months by the FRB, and which wa s not reported to Mr. Hallahan until 3/23/2012. In Deerfield Beach, non-Resident fees are much higher and proof of Residency of the Deceased is much more defined. Acceptable proof must be curre nt and valid and must include a photo ID plus one other form of identification for the De ceased at a City address as follows: Voter Registration card Water bill Electric bill Bank statement Phone bill Current medical bill. Delray Beach’s proof of Residency is not definitive enough. The Administrative Policy, CC-2, Page 3 o f 6, Paragraph 4 is shown on Attachment #4 hereto and should be updated; (Although not explicit in our policy, we look for the same kinds of proof or residency as does Deerfiel d. We have amended ou r policy on this point to be more explicit.) 6. A review of the Parks and Recreation Cemetery budget shows the following costs, as shown on Attachment #5 hereto: Supervision function: $79,916. This equa tes to $6,660 per month and $533 per burial; Interment function: $88,777. This equa tes to $7398 per month and $582 per burial; General Maintenance function: $20 7,926, including water expenses of over $50,000 per year. T his equates to $5472 per acre per year and $1386 per burial. (Is it really appropriate to charge current burials for the ongoing maintenance costs fo r all the prior burials plus the vacant areas o f the cemetery? That is what a pe rpetual care fee would be used fo r. The invested principal would generate enough income for the perpetual care of the cemetery when it is full.) These figures are based on 38 acres for the Cemetery and 150 in-ground burials per year. It is noted that these fees do not include the cost s incurred by the City Cler k’s office in keeping the records for the cemetery operations, whic h is an additional $40,000+/- per year. (We did not add any staff to the Clerk’s Office when they were given respon sibility for cemetery records maintenance and lot sales. In fact, their staff has since been reduced. The incremental cost in the Clerk’s Office is $862 annually. We strongly disagree with the $40,000 stated above.) It is recognized that all burials are not adult in-ground burials so these figures may be slightly “off”. The above-stated costs show a to tal cost of $2511 per burial as compared with present in-ground burial fees of $1100 (resident) and $1485 (non -resident) netting a LOSS of over $1000 pe r burial; (As indicated above, we do not believe it woul d be appropriate to char ge current burials for the cost of maintaining previously used burial sites and vacant areas.) 5 7. It is highly recommended that the City Manager i mmediately review and appr ove the updating of the Cemetery plot inventory (work on this updating is ongoing an d requires no approval from the City Manager) and adjustment of burial fees since the current fee structure is inadequate compared to the costs incurred and in comparison to th e fees charged by neighboring cities; (Fee increases were approved by the Commission on September 20, 2012. Also, the City Clerk’s Office is working with Environmental Services GIS staff to develop a mapping program which will enable the Clerk’s Office to generate a map of the cemetery showing occupied pl ots, sold but vacant pl ots and available plots.) 8. The adequacy of burial sites within the City shou ld also be addressed by the City Manager and City Clerk. As reported by the Sun Sentinel, which re ported a few details incorrectly but covered most o f the story properly, Boca Raton believes it has 80 to 100 years’ supply of plots and Pompano Beach, with 3000 plots, reports having a 50-year supply. Delray Beach Ci ty employee Tim Simmons stated that Delray Beach would run out of plots within 5 to 7 years, base d on the current usage of 150 plots per year. This may or may not be the case since th ere is not currently a correct inventory of available plots but records show that only 35 plots have been sold in the last 3 years, starting in 2008. It is also noted that the Delray Beach Cemetery has a super-abundance of roadways, some of which could easily be converted to plots, ex tending the cemetery’s life another 50 to 100 years. Proper planning and land use would make a huge difference in the lifespan of the existing Cemetery. (We agree that as the cemetery fills there are access ways which can be platted into blocks and lots and sold.) 9. Pricing for all Cemetery categories should also be evaluated and adjusted to be in keeping with those of surrounding municipalities; (Staff agrees.) 10. It is noted that not all burials occur in the City Cemetery. T here are many private cemeteries throughout Broward and Palm Beach counties as well as the new Nati onal Cemetery in Lantana. 11. Periodic reviews of the Cemetery operations should be performed at least every three years to update progress and to implement and benchm ark future recommendations. The Financial Review Board wishes to Thank Board Member Jack Hallahan for his considerable efforts in researching this Department’s opera tions and in the formation of these considerable recommendations. 6 7 8 9 10 11 MEMORANDUM TO:Mayor and City Commissioners FROM:Douglas E. Smith, Assistant City Manager THROUGH:David T. Harden, City Manager DATE:November 9, 2012 SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM WS.3 - SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2012 STATE AND FEDERAL LOBBYING SERVICES ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION The item before Commission is discussion of state a nd federal lobbying services. BACKGROUND At the October 16, 2012 Regular Meeting, the City C ommission selected Ballard Partners to provide lobbying services to the City regarding transient h ousing legislation. The Commission also expressed interest in considering a full-service state lobbyist from the group of firms that had already submitted proposals. In addition, the Commission discussed f ederal level lobbying at the October 16 meeting. Staff requested additional information from the sev en (7) firms that provided lobbying proposals: Ballard Partners, Capitol Alliance, Ericks Consulta nts, Florida Strategic Group, Greenberg Traurig, Ronald Book, and Weiss, Handler & Cornwell. Addit ional information from each firm is attached along with the original proposals. The additional information requested provided includes confirmatio n of the types of lobbying service offered, types of federal lobbying services/assistance that may be available, and information on several bills that th e firms lobbied for or against during the past stat e legislative session. Some information about the fi rms has been summarized in the attached Comparison Table. A draft document for the City's 2013 state legislat ive priorities will be provided to the Commission prior to the workshop meeting. Staff will be prepared to discuss the various propo sals at the Commission meeting. RECOMMENDATION Commission Discretion. State Lobbying Services - Summary Information Capitol Alliance Offices: Tallahassee Office plus professional associations with firms in West Palm Beach, Jacksonville, and Atlanta 2 $45,000 1 year No additional costs Yes Yes Yes, Palm Beach County, SFWMD, Army Corps Yes - in person, conference call, skype, video conferencing. Conf./video calls weekly during session. In person once a quarter or whenever necessary Yes, assist with strategic analysis of legislative needs and develop legislative agenda and educating/briefing Commission Yes, weekly during session; monthly during off session Yes, on specific issues. Also partner with Patton Boggs on various congressional appropriations issues. Very close relationship with FL Congressional delegation, and work closely with them on issues that impact FL and their clients. Strong relationships with White House and Executive Agencies and work on issues that affect their clients with those contacts. Work with Patton Boggs (full services federal lobbying firm) on legislation and appropriations items that affect their FL clients. City of Key West, Leon County, Port of Palm Beach , AT&T Develop City's Legislative Agenda Yes Clients have Included:Provide Federal Lobbying Services (summary of responses)Firm Name & Location # Legislative Lobbying Staff Assigned Cost Additional Costs (i.e. travel, printing) Max $250 per year. Anything else requires City pre- approval Yes Yes Yes Boca Raton, Palm Beach Gardens, Palm Beach, Martin Co. & Polk Co. Yes Yes Lobby State Legislature Lobby Exec. Branch/ State Agencies Lobby local and other agencies Meet on Regular Basis with City Provide Weekly Legislative Updates 3 (plus others as needed) $45,000 1 year Ballard Partners Offices : Tallahassee, West Palm Beach, Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa No. The Firm has for other clients in the past, assisted on an as needed basis (at no additional cost) with members of the Florida Delegation. Excellent relationships with nearly all Members of Congress from Florida and even several from outside the State. In any situation the firm can assist in setting up meetings or advocating for positions beneficial to the City, they are willing to do so. Have done this in the past specifically on federal appropriations projects and in helping with decisions out of the Army Corps of Engineers. Have partnered with federal lobbying firms: Patton Boggs, Alcalde & Fay, Barbour Griffith and Rogers. They would base their recommendation on the issues and scope of work needed. State Lobbying Services - Summary Information Develop City's Legislative Agenda Yes Clients have Included:Provide Federal Lobbying Services (summary of responses)Firm Name & Location # Legislative Lobbying Staff Assigned Cost Additional Costs (i.e. travel, printing) Max $250 per year. Anything else requires City pre- approval Yes Yes Yes Boca Raton, Palm Beach Gardens, Palm Beach, Martin Co. & Polk Co. Yes Yes Lobby State Legislature Lobby Exec. Branch/ State Agencies Lobby local and other agencies Meet on Regular Basis with City Provide Weekly Legislative Updates 3 (plus others as needed) $45,000 1 year Ballard Partners Offices : Tallahassee, West Palm Beach, Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa No. The Firm has for other clients in the past, assisted on an as needed basis (at no additional cost) with members of the Florida Delegation. Excellent relationships with nearly all Members of Congress from Florida and even several from outside the State. In any situation the firm can assist in setting up meetings or advocating for positions beneficial to the City, they are willing to do so. Have done this in the past specifically on federal appropriations projects and in helping with decisions out of the Army Corps of Engineers. Have partnered with federal lobbying firms: Patton Boggs, Alcalde & Fay, Barbour Griffith and Rogers. They would base their recommendation on the issues and scope of work needed. Ericks Consulting - offices in Tallahassee and Fort Lauderdale 4 $40,000 1 year All inclusive, except that for extensive travel, such as with federal issues, would request advance approval for expenses Yes Yes Yes, the entire team can lobby those and other agencies with the exception of Candice Eriks who cannot lobby Palm Beach County Yes Yes Yes Have strong relationships at the federal level and have assisted clients with federal issues. Many issues that they deal with at a state level are contingent on various Federal components. For example, they have worked for years collectively with clients such as Broward County, Palm Beach County, other cities, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority and JM Family on issues that require federal cooperation to succeed on a state or local level. Have also worked closely with the Administration for Children & Families’A ssistantASecretary,AGeorgeASheldon,A who served as the Secretary of the Florida Department of Children & Family Services before leaving for DC. They have relationships with various firms and would help the City team with whichever firm would be most effective depending on the specific issue being addressed. Broward County, Broward County Property Appraiser, Broward County Sheriff, Coconut Creek, Coral Springs, Fort Lauderdale, North Lauderdale, Pembroke Pines, Plantation, Palm Beach County, Davie Florida Strategic Group Offices: Lakeland 2 $36,000 1 year None Yes Yes Yes - as necessary Yes Yes Yes Yes. Currently provide federal consulting for the City of Lakeland and can develop a similar program for the City of Delray Beach. City of Lakeland, FL Association of Code Enforcement Yes - imperative to gain understanding of issues important to City. Should be a collaborative effort. 2 (plus others available to assist) $60,000 1 year Travel. Expect to keep to minimum. Plus typically include pre-approval for expenses over a certain level. Yes Yes Would focus on state level. However they have strong working relationships with local agencies (DB County and SFWMD). In FL and DC, have expertise working with US Army Corps and Corps of Engineers Yes - regular meetings will ensure highest level of representation for the City. Will meet in manner that best suits City (in person or conference call) Yes - During session, legislative language can change quickly. Important that close contact is maintained to ensure they are appropriately advocating our position. Greenberg Traurig Offices : Tallahassee (other FL offices - Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Orlando, Palm Beach County, Tampa) City of North Port, Florida Association of Court Clerks, AT&T Yes. DC Governmental Affairs team has successfully provided legislative representation and lobbying at the federal level for a number of municipal clients. Their team has achieved fiscal and policy successes on behalf of their municipal clients, securing more than $250 million in funding over the past decade. State Lobbying Services - Summary Information Develop City's Legislative Agenda Yes Clients have Included:Provide Federal Lobbying Services (summary of responses)Firm Name & Location # Legislative Lobbying Staff Assigned Cost Additional Costs (i.e. travel, printing) Max $250 per year. Anything else requires City pre- approval Yes Yes Yes Boca Raton, Palm Beach Gardens, Palm Beach, Martin Co. & Polk Co. Yes Yes Lobby State Legislature Lobby Exec. Branch/ State Agencies Lobby local and other agencies Meet on Regular Basis with City Provide Weekly Legislative Updates 3 (plus others as needed) $45,000 1 year Ballard Partners Offices : Tallahassee, West Palm Beach, Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa No. The Firm has for other clients in the past, assisted on an as needed basis (at no additional cost) with members of the Florida Delegation. Excellent relationships with nearly all Members of Congress from Florida and even several from outside the State. In any situation the firm can assist in setting up meetings or advocating for positions beneficial to the City, they are willing to do so. Have done this in the past specifically on federal appropriations projects and in helping with decisions out of the Army Corps of Engineers. Have partnered with federal lobbying firms: Patton Boggs, Alcalde & Fay, Barbour Griffith and Rogers. They would base their recommendation on the issues and scope of work needed. Yes Yes Yes. During session, provide written reports weekly and phone and e‐mailAupdatesAasA necessary for priority issues. Also provide written reports and updates coinciding with all interim committee meeting weeks in Dec., Jan.and Feb. Yes - maintain close working relationships with professionals in the Governor's office and state agencies. Yes - will also work closely with the Florida League of Cities on any item approved by the City. Yes - make themselves available to clients as requested. Able to meet with City officials/ staff in Delray Beach or by conference call at any time Boca Raton, PBC Sheriff & Broward County Sheriff Yes. During legislative session will provide a weekly summary report detailing legislative action taken during the week, status of legislative issues, and anticipated action during the upcoming week. 19 Florida Cities & 4 Counties 3 $50,000 1 year None Yes Yes Yes Weiss, Handler & Cornwell Offices : Boca Raton, Tallahassee Ronald Book Offices : Aventura and Tallahassee Do not provide federal lobbying services, but can assist with arranging meetings with federal representatives, congressional staff and federal agencies. Extremely well accessed within the entire Florida Delegation and with many members outside of the Florida Delegation. Do not partner with any firms that provide federal lobbying services, but could provide a short list of firms that they believe the city should consider for federal lobbying services. Yes, Have many relationships with the Executive Branch, numerous agencies, and both Houses of Congress. Work on both legislative initiatives and Executive Branch implementation of adopted legislation. Firm's federal lobbying services are coordinated through Joseph Abruzzo 3 $35,000 Nov. 2012 - May 2013 Any additional expense must be agreed upon by City before incurred Yes - maintain an office in Tallahassee; there full time during committee weeks and legislative session and frequently when the legislature is not in session. Yes - currently lobby Palm Beach County for other clients and have close contacts and experience working with Palm Beach County Commissioners, Constitutional Officers and their respective staffs and the SFWMD City of Delray Beach - Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Ballard Partners Contact Information: Joe McCann, 403 East Park Avenue, Tallahassee, FL 32301. (850) 577-0444. 1. Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach Brian Ballard, President Joe McCann, Senior Vice President Mat Forrest, Governmental Consultant (Greg Turbeville, Carol Bracy and John Johnson to be utilized on an as needed basis) 2. List types of additional costs above the annual fee, if any (i.e. travel, printing, etc.) Maximum $250 per year. Anything else would have to be pre -approved by the City. 3. Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: a. Lobby State Legislature Yes b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes c. Lobbylocal and other agencies (i.e. Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). Yes d. Meet regularly with City elected officials and/or staff (i.e., in - person, conference call, etc.) Yes e. Develop City’s state legislative agenda Yes f. Provide weekly legislative updates during session Yes g. Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Yes Executive Branch and State Agencies 4. Does your firm provide federal lobbying services? If so, please describe. No. a. Ifyour firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, please describe the type of assistance that may be available. The Firm has for other clients in the past, assisted on an as needed basis (at no additional cost) with members of the Florida Delegation. We have excellent relationships with nearly all Members of Co ngress from Florida and even several from outside the State. In any situation where the Firm can assist in setting up meetings or advocating for positions beneficial to the City we are more than willing to do so. We have done this in the past specifically on federal appropriations projects and in helping with decisions out of the Army Corps of Engineers. Washington lobbying, however, is very difficult to do from Tallahassee for obvious reasons. The City would be better served to contract with a Firm in t he D.C. area with relationships beyond Florida. b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partners with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. We have partnered with several federal lobbying firms. We have done work in the past with: Patton Boggs, Alcalde & Fay and Barbour, Griffith and Rogers. All provide full service in the federal lobbying arena. We would base our recommendation on the issue and scope of work needed. 5. Provide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session, and provide a summary of the final result. The Firm had a very busy legislative session last year. Examples of lobbying for/against are: On the appropriations front: we were successful in funding for the Elliott Museum in Martin County, funding for a work release program within the Department of Corrections, protecting nursing home’s from significant rate cuts, holding Miami C hildren’s Hospital harmless from medicaid cuts and other individual projects such as funding for the Baptist Hospital Outpatient facility. On the legislative side 2012 was a year with a great deal of defense. One example was one of the most controversial bills of the year. We were able to work to defeat legislation, against great odds, that would have made it very difficult to for physicians to continue dispensing medications to workers comp patients. City  of  Delray  Beach  ‐ Additional  Information  for  Annual  State  Lobbying  Services   Firm  Name: Capitol Alliance Group   Contact  Information:  Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey (Jeff@capitolalliancegroup.com) 1.  Number  and  titles  of   lobbying  staff  to  be   assigned  to  City  of  Delray   Beach   2 Professional staff assigned to City Client Services Management 1. Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey, Managing Partner 2. Ms. Barbara Flury 2. List  types  of  additional   costs  above  the  annual   fee, if  any  (i.e. travel,  printing, etc.)  No additional costs 3.  Does  your  firm  provide   the  following  services  as   part  of  a  comprehensive   annual  state  lobbying   services  agreement:  a. Lobby  State   Legislature    Yes b. Lobby  Executive   Branch  and  State   Agencies   Yes c. Lobby  local  and  other   agencies  (i.e. Palm   Beach  County, South  FL   Water  Management   District, US  Army  Corp.  etc.).  Yes, Palm Beach County, SFWMD, Army Corps d. Meet  regularly  with   City  elected  officials   and/or  staff  (i.e., in ‐ person, conference  call,  etc.)  Yes, meetings in person, via conference call, skype, video conferencing 1. Conference Calls/Video calls on a weekly basis during legislative session; 2. In person meetings once a quarter or whenever necessary e. Develop  City’s  state   legislative  agenda   Yes, we assist with strategic analysis of legislative needs and develop legislative agenda with all of our clients as well as assist in educating and briefing council members on agenda f. Provide  weekly   legislative  updates   during  session   Yes, weekly during session and Monthly during off session periods g.  Set  up  meetings  with   State  Legislative  Offices,  Executive  Branch  and   Yes State  Agencies   4.  Does  your  firm  provide   federal  lobbying  services?   If  so, please  describe.    Yes, on specific issues. In addition we partner with Patton Boggs on various congressional appropriations issues. a.  If  your  firm  does  not   provide  federal   lobbying  services, but   maintains  contacts  at   the  federal  level  that   could  assist  the  City   with  federal  level   issues, please  describe   the  type  of  assistance   that  may  be  available.  We have very close relationsh ips with Florida Congressional delegation and staff and work closely with them on issues that impact Florida and our clients. In addition, we have strong professional and person al relationships with senior staff at the White House and Ex ecutive Agencies, such as US DOT,US Dept of Commerce, US DEP, Homeland Security and work on issues that affect our clients with thos e contacts b.  If  your  firm  does  not   provide  federal   lobbying  services, but   partners  with  a  firm   that  does, please   describe  the  partner   firm(s) and  services   available.  Patton Boggs is a full service federal lobbying firm with extensive congressional and Ex ecutive Branch contacts with both political parties. We work closely with them on legislation and appropriations items that affect our clients in Florida. They provide a full range of lobbying services and widely respected as one of the top 10 firms in DC 5.  Provide  information   on  at  least  two  (2) bills   that  your  firm  lobbied  for   or  against  during  the  past   state  legislative  session,  and  provide  a  summary   of  the  final  result.  SB 1996 – Dept of Economic Opportunity – prime advocate on bill related to community economic development and workforce housing, successful in passing language that authorized priority funding for workforce housing in various communities. HB 1223 – Relating to Highway Safety and motor Vehicles – we were successful in passing se veral provisions in this bill that would allow for FDOT to fund bicycle transportation as part of the state Strategic Intermodal system.         State Legislative Lobbyist for the City of Delray Beach, Florida Proposal October 11, 2012 Submitted By: Capitol Alliance Group 106 E. College Ave #640 Tallahassee, FL 32301 Phone: (850)224-1660 Fax: (850)224-6785 Contact Person: Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey I.Introduction The Capitol Alliance Group is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Delray Beach for State Lobbying Services. As one of Florida’s top state level government relations’ firms in Florida with extensive experience in strategic issues’ management , public policy analysis and government relations advocacy for a diverse list of private and public sector clients, as well as the creation and development of transient rental ordinances. With strong bi-partisan Democratic and Republican credentials, each member of the firm possesses strong professional experience working in the private, public and legislative sectors and is widely recognized as being a leader in the Florida lobbying corps. The firm enjoys a strong reputation for unparalleled integrity, professionalism and commitment to its’ clients and to the lobbying process. The Capitol Alliance Group also has great contacts with Florida’s Congressional Delegation and would be willing to assist Delray Beach in their federal priorities with a cost effective partner. The CAG partners are experts at analyzing critical policy issues, assessing economic and political trends at the national, state and local levels, and evaluating and recommending political and legislative strategies for resolving the challenges facing businesses and local governments. The partners in the Alliance each have more than two decades of experience each working inside and outside of state and local governments at the highest level, including such diverse positions as former member of the Florida Legislature, State Agency Director, Senior Staff to the Governor and Consultant to the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Their professional experience, close working relationships with Governor Scott, the Speaker (and Speakers-elect) of the House, Senate President (and Senate Presidents-elect) and other top policy makers in the Executive and Legislative branches of government, coupled with their extensive knowledge of the political process, and their enthusiasm and stringent business ethics, makes The Capitol Alliance Group one of the premier lobbying and issues management groups in Florida and an excellent legislative consultant partner for City of Delray Beach. The firm’s clients represent a diverse cross section of public and private sector interests, but CAG is known for its strong knowledge base and expertise in legislative and agency issues related to local governments, including transportation, economic and tourism development, housing, urban and community development, property taxation and environmental permitting and regulation, among others. II.Firm Background The Capitol Alliance Group, Inc. has a stellar reputation as a government relations' consulting firm with a proven track record of success in serving a broad range of client's interest at the state and local level in Florida along with a strong presence in DC with the Florida congressional delegation. Created in 1995 in Tallahassee, FL by a team of seasoned government relations professionals with diverse political and professional lobbying experiences, the Capitol Alliance Group has client and professional interests ranging from Pensacola to Jacksonville to Key West. Led by Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey, the professional staff includes 6 research and support staff, all focused on providing high level, quality service to the diverse array of clients represented by the firm. The firm prides itself on outstanding client services, research driven strategies, and performance based outcomes. With offices in Tallahassee, and professional associations with firms in West Palm Beach, Jacksonville and Atlanta, the firm's partners have a strong understanding of the critical legislative and regulatory issues affecting businesses and organizations. The firm is best known for its’ ability to analyze complex policy issues, assess economic and political trends, and recommend successful political and legislative strategies for resolving the challenges facing their public and private sector clients. In addition, the firm’s core operating principles value straightforward, honest and frequent client communications to help manage and maintain client expectations during the ever-changing issue dynamics during the legislative session in Tallahassee - extremely important in working with local government elected officials and staff who need to understand the impact of policy decisions on their citizens and budgets. The members of Capitol Alliance Group understand the needs of local elected officials and staff and are extremely familiar with the issues facing local governments at the state level, and the possible implications they might have on the City of Delray Beach. Their close working relationships with top policy makers in the Executive and Legislative branches of government, extensive knowledge of the political process, unbridled enthusiasm and stringent business ethics, has made The Capitol Alliance Group one of the premier lobbying and issues management groups in the Southern region. III.Client Representation We have provided a summary list of clients the firm has represented over the last several years. As indicated, the firm’s government relations advocacy focuses on a wide variety of industry and local government interests affecting almost every aspect of Delray Beach and Florida; including: •Local government finance and operations •Aerospace •Property Taxation •Transportation •Information and Systems Technology •Public Safety and EMS •Coastal Erosion and Beach re-nourishment •Economic and Tourism Development •Property Insurance •Pension Funds and Retirement plans •Workforce and Affordable Housing •Sustainable Community Development •Growth Management •Telecommunications •Energy and Alternative Energies •Education •Health Care More importantly, Capitol Alliance Group professionals focus extensively on the state appropriations process, working hard to insert client budget priorities into the agency and Governor’s budget and working closely with the legislative appropriations members to ensure successful passage of budget items in the final appropriations bills. IV.Local Government Advocacy Experience CAG has represented local governments, special districts, and community public private partnerships to the Florida Legislature, Governor’s office and state agencies, including Leon County , City of North Miami , City of Key West , City of Tallahassee, and others. The firm has a first-hand understanding of local government financial and fiscal dynamics, infrastructure requirements, regulatory concerns, growth management pressures, and the unique, if not strained, working relationship that has emerged over the last several years between the legislature and local counties and cities. The CAG partners are well versed on the impact of “unfunded mandates” from the legislature, the recent fiscal pressures created by the property tax reform initiatives, as well as the unique legislative obstacles and opportunities available to City of Delray Beach. CAG has worked closely with the Florida League of Cities in pursuing their legislative agenda on behalf of all of it’s members. Recently, representing Leon County in the Capitol City, our role has often been to work closely with FAC and the League on the development of legislative strategies on a myriad of issues. V.Advocacy Team for the City of Delray Beach The Capitol Alliance Group will assign it’s top legislative professionals to service the contract with the City. Often times, lobbying firms will delegate responsibilities for local government issues to junior staff. CAG understands the complexities of local government issues and believes that its best team needs to be “on the field” to ensure success on these issues. For many years, state government passed frequent unfunded mandates on to cities and counties and questioned local governments’ home rule authority. Because of that mindset, we believe our top lobbyists need to be at the forefront communicating and advocating with legislators on the needs of the city. The following chart identifies the professional client management team assigned to the City of Delray Beach contract. Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey (Project Manager) – Dr. Sharkey is the founding member and Managing Partner of the firm. He has over 22 years of lobbying experience in addition to 6 years of employment at senior positions in the Executive and Legislative branches of Florida Government. His lobbying expertise includes transportation, infrastructure, growth management, affordable housing and ad valorem taxation. In addition, Dr. Sharkey is widely known for his knowledge of highway, transit, rail, seaport and airport funding, as well as growth management, water and waste water infrastructure regulation and financing. He is well versed on local government legislative issues, having represented the City of Tallahassee for 5 years and currently representing other cities and special districts around the state of Florida. Dr. Sharkey has been at the forefront of advocacy of affordable housing since the aftermath of Hurricane Andrew in 1992. He and the professionals in his firm have a great deal of expertise in successfully addressing the legislative and regulatory issues facing local governments and businesses interested in sustainable community development, infrastructure financing, and transportation access. He has developed strong professional relationships with the legislative leadership, committee and appropriations staff, the Governor’s office and Agency heads to ensure the needs of his clients are understood and respected. City of Delray Beach City Commission Mr. Joe Arnall (Associate Partner) Dr. Jeffrey Sharkey (Partner and Project Manager) Ms. Barbara Flury (Associate) Mr. Corey Peterson (Legislative Programs Director) In addition, Dr. Sharkey has been actively involved in statewide issue campaigns for over fifteen years, providing him rare insight into the politics and an ability to shape successful business and community development projects. He has been successful in creating, mobilizing and evaluating public policy issues and trends to position his clients to prepare and take advantage of new challenges and opportunities occurring in the arenas of state and local governments. He is ultimately familiar with the dynamics that are created when local, state and national politics intersect with the desire to shape public policy in the local, Legislative or Executive branches of government. Dr. Sharkey is closely attuned to the budget and other community issues facing the City of Delray Beach. Having lived in Palm Beach County for 5 years and spending ample time in Delray Beach, he is familiar with the structure and operations of local government and can help immediately to enhance the city visibility with state legislators and state agencies quickly and effectively. Dr. Sharkey began his professional career as a teacher and school administrator and has worked in England, Thailand, Latin America and in other parts of the world as a consultant for various international agencies. He has worked for the Dept of Education, Office of the Governor, and Florida Legislator, all in senior staff positions. A native of Minnesota, he holds a B.S. degree in English, a M.Ed. in Educational Research, a M.S. in Sociology and Economics and a Ph.D. from Florida State University in International Development. He serves on a multitude of non profit boards, including Florida Association of Volunteer Action for the Caribbean and the Americans, Children’s Miracle Network, member of Leadership Florida and He is also a small business owner with several restaurants in Tallahassee. He is married and lives in Tallahassee. Mr. Corey Peterson – Mr. Peterson is the Legislative Programs Manager for the Capitol Alliance Group and longtime resident of City of Delray Beach. During Corey’s tenure in City of Delray Beach, he was immersed in the issues effecting the county and it’s residents. Corey has specific City of Delray Beach knowledge of the space industry, coastal economic development, tourism, education and property insurance. With Four years of direct legislative experience with major appropriations issues and a concentrated focus on local governance, property taxation, and agency regulation issues, he has proven herself to be a tireless advocate for client’s interest. In addition to legislative issues management, he has developed excellent relations with the state agency management leadership and interfaces regularly with the agency Secretaries to ensure that clients have access to top decision makers. Mr. Peterson is a graduate of Florida State University. He is responsible for mobilizing legislation and communicating with legislators and agency representatives on the needs of the clients. Mr. Peterson lives in Tallahassee Mr. Joseph H. Arnall – Mr. Arnall was a member of the Florida Legislature from the Jacksonville area for 12years, from 1990 to 2002, serving as the powerful Rules Chair for the last 4 years of his career when the Republican minority took over as the majority. He is now a partner with Capitol Alliance Group and manages the Jacksonville and Atlanta offices. During his tenure in the legislature, he was respected by his colleagues as a strong advocate and expert in a variety issue areas, including insurance, growth management, transportation, telecommunications and banking. Mr. Arnall is a Chartered Life Underwriter and Financial Consultant by profession, and his business interests include insurance and real estate. He has been an effective lobbyist for a variety of client interests and has maintained his strong relationship with leadership in the Florida Legislature and Governor’s office. He has held membership in Chartered Life Underwriters, Jacksonville Chapter; Life Member of the Million Dollar Round Table; Jacksonville Chamber of Commerce; National Trust for Historic Preservation; and the American Legislative Exchange Council; the Georgia Chamber of Commerce and the Florida Chamber. VI.Why Choose Capitol Alliance Group Ability, Character and Skill of the proposer to perform the Contract The Capitol Alliance Group is widely respected by Legislators, Executive Branch leadership and other lobbyists as one of the top statewide legislative advocacy firms in Florida. Based in Tallahassee, and with affiliated associates in West Palm Beach, and Jacksonville, the firm’s partner’s have over 50 years of experience working inside and outside of state and local governments. The firm’s principles have extensive experience representing cities, counties, special districts, and CRA’s as well as a wide variety of industries and businesses throughout the state so they understand how large and small policy decisions contemplated in the halls of the Capitol affect the ability of public and private entities to manage their organizations, customers and their future. The firm partners have personal experience working the process as legislators, legislative staff directors, senior Governor’s staff, cabinet aides and other positions within state government so they understand the culture of decision making within that environment. As private government relations professionals, they have represented a significant diversity of issues affecting almost every facet of Florida. Between the partners collectively, the firm has drafted and passed over 50 pieces of legislation, worked to secure hundreds of millions of dollars in appropriations and defeated hundreds of bills and amendments that would harm the interest of our clients. We have exceptionally strong skills in working the appropriations committees in the House and Senate as well as a wide variety of substantive committee issue areas. Representing local governments takes a unique set of skills and communication abilities, which members of CAG have honed to ensure we meet our local government client expectations. We have attached a letter of reference from the Leon County County Administrator, one of our local government clients with whom we have worked and performed successfully. We bring a unique blend of tireless enthusiasm, unparalleled knowledge of the legislative process, and exceptional advocacy skills to our clients needs. The firm has a strong affinity, history and understanding of issues directly related to the City. In particular, key members of the firm have longstanding ties to Palm Beach County. In addition the firm is one of the top lobbying firms in Florida on issues related to seaport, airport and intermodal transportation issues, having represented the Florida Ports Council for 10 years, the Florida Airports Council for 4 years and the Florida Intermodal Transportation Association since it’s inception. Also, the firm is well respected for it’s knowledge of sustainable community development, growth management and coastal management, all of which are directly related to Delray Beach economic, community and social development. The Character, Integrity, Reputation, Judgment, Experience and Efficiency of the Firm The CAG firm is committed to the highest levels of professionalism, commitment to client goals and reputation and successful accomplishment of the clients’ legislative and regulatory agenda. Survivability in the government relations advocacy business is directly related to the trust your clients place in you and how well you maintain that trust. The CAG has been successfully proving to clients our dependability, honesty and integrity for over 17 years, with a tremendous level of client retention, which is a testimony to what we believe is a level of outstanding service and professionalism. Our experience allows us to navigate the complicated legislative process quickly and effectively. Our cultivated relationships with top legislative leadership in both chambers and both parties allows us access to key decision-makers, accurate assessment of emerging issues, and input into final decisions on legislation, amendments and appropriations items. All of this, combined with our strategic insights into how issues trend in multiple dimensions during legislative discussions, allows us to successfully affect the changes that our clients need during this process. We are certain that our extensive institutional knowledge of the legislative and regulatory process, superb relationships with the Governor, Senior Cabinet members and Legislators, along with their strategic political acumen will prove to be invaluable during the tumultuous legislative and budget process over the next year. Knowledge of the General Character and environment of Florida Cities, including successful experience serving local governments in Florida As mentioned, CAG has represented local governments, special districts, and community public private partnerships to the Florida Legislature, Governor’s office and state agencies, including Leon County , City of North Miami , City of Key West , City of Tallahassee, and others. The firm has a first-hand understanding of local government financial and fiscal dynamics, infrastructure requirements, regulatory concerns, growth management pressures, and the unique, if not strained, working relationship that has emerged over the last several years between the legislature and local counties and cities. The CAG partners are well versed on the impact of “unfunded mandates” from the legislature, the recent fiscal pressures created by the property tax reform initiatives, as well as the unique legislative obstacles and opportunities available to City of Delray Beach. CAG has worked closely with the Florida League of Cities in pursuing their legislative agenda on behalf of all of it’s members. Because of this, we understand extremely well the concerns and culture of cities and local governments. We have attached a list of successful appropriations items for our local government clients for your review. In addition, CAG works year round, not just during legislative session, on regulatory and state agency issues for it’s local government clients to assist with their needs. This is particularly important with the level of federal funding flowing into the state through various agencies. We would assist Delray Beach in pursuing funding for projects that are either on the federal stimulus list or for which they may be eligible. Legislative Reporting Capitol Alliance Group believes in keeping their clients informed of the latest developments with pending legislation and proposed actions by state government agencies and officials. For that reason, the members of Capitol Alliance Group use an integrated communications system to keep clients aware of all developments. To ensure success, Capitol Alliance Group holds weekly conference calls to discuss priorities, strategies and intelligence. Also, Capitol Alliance Group provides weekly legislative updates entitled “Capitol Update” to offer important legislation tracking information. These updates are provided during committee weeks and throughout the Legislative Session on every Friday by 5 p.m. This valuable piece of information allows for Capitol Alliance Group and its clients to prepare for the week ahead and reflect on the movement of legislation throughout the process. This effective tool provides enormous benefit to the client and tracking the progression of their established priorities. VII.Compensation We are providing a two tiered Fee for Service proposal. The first is for a Single Issue contract, where CAG would be hired to successfully accomplish legislative approval on one major item for the City. The second contract is for a full legislative advocacy arrangement where CAG would advocate on behalf of the City for any and all issues affecting the City. Single Issue Contract - The all inclusive retainer fee for State Lobbying Services as identified in this proposal shall be $25,000 for eight (8) months (November 1, 2012 through July 1, 2013 – the 2013 Legislative session). The fee shall be paid in monthly installments. Full Service Contract - The all inclusive retainer fee for Full Contract State Lobbying Services as identified in this proposal shall be $45,000 for twelve (12) months. This will include monitoring, advocating and mobilizing on all issues affecting the City. The fee shall be paid in monthly installments. References Leon County 301 S. Monroe Street, 5th Floor Tallahassee, FL. 32301 Contact Person: Vince Long, County Manager (850) 606-5300 Date of Contract: October 1, 2008 to present Capitol Alliance Group has worked with Leon County on numerous issues during this last legislative session including the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2008 (ARRA), Health and Human Services, Energy, Economic Development, Transportation, Affordable Housing and countless other priorities. During the initial Economic Stimulus discussions, Capitol Alliance Group began meeting with Agency Secretaries and the Governor to position Leon County to receive the maximum amount of funds available. Because of these important meetings, Leon County secured over $9million in Road improvement funds during the initial allocation period. Other efforts by Capitol Alliance Group on behalf of the Leon County include securing additional Down Payment Assistance Funds, Inclusion in statewide prison diversion pilot program as well as many others. City of Key West 525 Angela Street Key West, FL 33040 Contact Person: Mayor Craig Cates, (305)809-3888 Date of Contract: June 5, 2007-2012 Capitol Alliance Group is working with the City of Key West to develop strategic relationships for the development of community sustainability and affordable housing. Working with both public and private sector partners, Capitol Alliance Group has developed a short and long term housing strategy and transient rental strategies for properties owned by the City and other public and private entities. While in Tallahassee, Capitol Alliance Group is working on identifying and nurturing new affordable workforce housing opportunities for the City. Capitol Alliance Group is tireless in their efforts in Tallahassee to bring more affordable workforce housing policy that will benefit the City of Key West and others. Port of Palm Beach 1 E 11th St # 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33404-6921 Contact Person for Contract and Procurement: Manny Almira, Director (561) 842-4201 Date of Contract: July 1, 2005 Throughout the years of representing the Port of Palm Beach, Capitol Alliance Group has coordinated efforts with The Governor’s Executive Office, Office of Tourism, Trade and Economic Development, Department of Transportation, Department of Environmental Protection, The Agency for Workforce Innovation and many others. Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for identifying new business opportunities for the Port in the Legislature as well as monitor legislation that impacts the Port of Palm Beach. Capitol Alliance Group realizes the importance of international trade and tourism to Florida’s ports. With Port Canaveral located in the shadows of Kennedy Space Center, many tourists and businesses find Port Canaveral to be a prime port of call. Using industry contacts, knowledge and business development principals, Capitol Alliance Group will be able to assist City of Delray Beach in accelerating growth at Port Canaveral and the surrounding areas. Dr. Jeff Sharkey, Founder and partner in Capitol Alliance Group has also provided lobbying services for groups such as The Florida Maritime Industries Association, Florida-Caribbean Cruise Association and the Florida Ports Council. City of Destiny 101 Pugliese's Way, Suite 200 Delray Beach, FL 33444 Contact Person for Contract and Procurement: Sara Paul (888)2DESTINY Date of Contract: July 21, 2008 Capitol Alliance Group was contracted by the City of Destiny to assist in the development of an Integrated Intermodal Distribution Center for this newly created city. The City of Destiny is in development to become the first Eco-Sustainable Green City. Because of Capitol Alliance Group’s previous experience and background in intermodal transportation policy and planning, Capitol Alliance Group was chosen during a worldwide search. Working on such a large project required the firm to work closely with CSX, FEC, Department of Transportation and many other private and public entities. Along with intermodal transportation policy and planning, Capitol Alliance Group is assisting with green-company recruitment and economic development opportunities. City of Tallahassee Contact Person: Anita Favors Adams Street Tallahassee, FL 32301 Date of Contract: 1998-2005 A.Provide list of current clients, a brief description of the services provided, the term of the contract with each client, number of years each client has contracted with the firm, and the fees charged by the clients.   ▪City of Key West – Capitol Alliance Group currently is working with the City of Key West to develop a strategic affordable housing plan that will provide more affordable housing options for Key West residents. Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for consulting with affordable housing stakeholders to determine need and viability of proposed projects. Also, Capitol Alliance Group is in charge of securing public and private partners for the City to assist in the creation of new affordable housing units. The City of Key West has been a client of Capitol Alliance Group since June 2006 and will remain under contract through June 2010. The fees for this contract are based on hourly work and average around $4,000 a month. ▪City of Destiny – Located off the Florida Turnpike in Osceola County, Destiny is America’s first eco-sustainable community. Capitol Alliance Group is developing a strategy for the successful creation of an Integrated Intermodal Distribution Center at Destiny. The contract extends through June 2010 with a monthly fee of $2,500. Capitol Alliance Group and Destiny began working together in July 2008. ▪Leon County - Capitol Alliance Group has represented Florida’s Capital County for the last 3 years as the County’s primary State Lobbying Firm. Working with our Federal Partners, Patton and Boggs, Capitol Alliance Group has advocated on behalf of Leon County on a wide variety of issues including economic development, affordable housing, septic tank mandates and health department services. The contract for services and fees are for $4,000 a month. ▪AT&T ▪All Saints Square – All Saints Square is a 42 unit, mixed use workforce housing development in Tallahassee Florida. In the heart of downtown Tallahassee, All Saints Square is a vital part of Tallahassee’s Gaines Street Revitalization Plan. Capitol Alliance Group is assisting All Saints Square with the Credit Underwriting portion of the Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program (CWHIP). Part of the firm’s responsibilities is educating the client on state, local and federal policies and programs incentives for workforce housing. As well as identifying state and federal financial resources and regulatory incentives to help fund the clients’ CWHIP project in Leon County. Capitol Alliance Group began work with All Saints Square in June 2008 and will continue to work with the client until credit underwriting is complete. The fees associated with this contract are $30,000 for the entire underwriting consulting. ▪Benderson Development – One of the nation’s largest privately owned development companies, Benderson Development Company currently owns and manages over 250 properties in 35 states. Their portfolio includes 29 million square feet in industrial parks, office buildings residential communities, hotels and self storage facilities. Capitol Alliance Group is currently doing affordable housing consulting for Benderson Development in 2 counties in Florida. A portion of Capitol Alliance Groups’ responsibilities include identifying and nurturing new housing opportunities for affordable workforce housing with state, federal and local housing policy makers. Capitol Alliance Group has been working with Benderson Development since June 2008 and has a contract running through December 2008. Affordable housing consulting fees for this contract are $5,000 monthly. ▪Big Bend Community Based Care – One of Florida’s Community Based Care Lead Agencies, Big Bend Community Based Care is responsible for overseeing foster care services in Florida’s Panhandle. Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for monitoring pending legislation; identifying Legislative and Executive Branch foster care child support funding. Capitol Alliance Group also provides legislative advocacy to protect and strengthen the Panhandle’s foster care agencies. The contract between Capitol Alliance Group and Big Bend Community Based Care is for 12 months, ending in March 2009. Fees associated with this contract are $3,500 monthly. ▪Capital Trust Agency – Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for monitoring affordable housing trends and state housing priorities. Other responsibilities include: meeting with the Legislature, Governor’s Office, Florida Housing Finance Corporation and other statewide affordable housing organizations to educate and advocate for support of Capital Trust Agency’s programs. Capital Trust Agency has been a client for 5 years and their contract is through December 2009. The fees for this agreement are $3,000 monthly. ▪Community Education Centers/Civigenics – Community Education Centers (CEC) is a leading provider of treatment and educational services for adult and juvenile corrections and social services populations throughout the United States. Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for assessing corrections and offender treatment funding priorities at the state level. Other responsibilities include organizing meetings with key corrections and juvenile justice policymakers, assistance in applying for the operation of one or more private correctional facilities administered by the Department of Management Services. Capitol Alliance Group has been working with CEC for over 4 years and continues to be under contract until October 2008. Monthly fees associated with this contract are $2,500. ▪Florida Intermodal Transportation Association ▪ “Go Green” Florida - Capitol Alliance Group is working with Coalition for Renewable Energy Solutions to develop the “Go Green” Florida license plate. The license plate is being developed to raise awareness in creating a sustainable environment. Funds generated from this license plate will be used to provide educational opportunities for children interested in green technologies, sustainable development and responsible living. Capitol Alliance Group is helping Coalition for Renewable Energy Solutions in the application process associated with the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. Along with the application process, Capitol Alliance Group will be finding a legislative sponsor, who will oversee the passing of the “Go Green” license plate legislation. This contract runs through May 2009 and is for $2,500 monthly. ▪HRH/GlenCairn – Capitol Alliance Group is currently working with HRH/Glencairn to assess the status of insurance and reinsurance polices and programs in the State of Florida. Additionally, Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for meeting with members of the Cabinet to discuss Property and Causality insurance and reinsurance solutions. Capitol Alliance Group will identify new business opportunities with public and private entities throughout Florida. The terms of this contract are for 12 months, ending in July 2009, with a $6,000 monthly fee. ▪Lee County Habitat For Humanity – Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for monitoring state housing issues in the legislature, Governor’s Office and Florida Housing Finance Corporation. While working with Lee County Habitat for Humanity, Capitol Alliance Group continuously has organized meetings with key housing policymakers, as well as worked to pass legislation to fully fund the Community Contribution Tax Credit program. Every month, Capitol Alliance Group provides Lee County Habitat for Humanity with a legislative update and issue report. Capitol Alliance Group has been working with Habitat for Humanity for four years and has a contract currently that runs through July 2009. Capitol Alliance Group’s fee for affordable housing consultation is $4,583 monthly. ▪Margaritaville Holdings, LLC ▪MDG/Fountain Lakes LLC. – MDG Corp. is affordable housing developer in Collier County. Capitol Alliance Group is currently assisting MDG with their Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program (CWHIP) application. MDG was recently selected for a $5 million forgivable loan to develop affordable housing in Collier County. Capitol Alliance Group is not only responsible for the submission of MDG’s application for CWHIP, but also identifying additional funding opportunities for the client’s project. The contract between the two parties is for $40,000 and is valid through the completion of the client’s project. ▪National Electrical Contractor’s Association (NECA) – Capitol Alliance Group has been working with NECA for 4 years, helping educate and advocate for electrical contractors, the building industry and other areas identified by the client. Other duties include providing accurate and timely information, intelligence feedback, and communication on developments of any legislative or agency issues. The terms of this contract is for 12 months, ending in January 2009. Capitol Alliance Group is paid $3,000 a month for services provided. ▪North Miami Community Redevelopment Authority ▪Port of Palm Beach – The Port of Palm Beach is currently in the process of developing an Inland Cargo and Freight Distribution Center. This inland Intermodal logistics hub is essential to the economic development of South Florida and the state. Capitol Alliance Group is acting as the liaison between the Port and state policymakers in order to keep the Port of Palm Beach as the lead agency associated with the Southeast Distribution Center. Other roles include: acquiring financial resources to continue strategic planning for the project, and provide a business demand and site options analysis. Capitol Alliance Group has represented the Port for 2 years and the terms of current contract run through December 2009 with a fee of $2,000 monthly. ▪Prime Homebuilders – Prime Homebuilders is one of the states largest privately owned builders, with commercial and residential properties throughout Florida. Capitol Alliance Group is responsible for the development of workforce and affordable housing strategies. Capitol Alliance Group also assisted in the submission of four (4) Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program (CWHIP) applications. Duties associated with the submission of applications include: developing strategies, creating public/private partnerships as defined under CWHIP program and developing a financing structure for the projects. Capitol Alliance Group also advises Prime of potential housing opportunities and provides a monthly report of work completed. The current contract is for 6 months and runs through January 2009, with a monthly fee of $5,000. ▪Save the Manatee Club – Capitol Alliance Group is the lead advocate for Save the Manatee Club and helps develop strategies on how to best protect the needs of the species and organization. Other responsibilities include meeting with Florida’s state policy and decision makers to help communicate the need of manatees in Florida. The services contract extends through November 2008 and monthly fees are set at $3,000. ▪SCA Properties – Capitol Alliance Group assists SCA properties by providing continued legislative and property appraiser support for tax abatement for affordable housing properties. It is also the responsibility of Capitol Alliance Group to pass legislation that will expand tax abatement for affordable housing properties owned wholly by non profit organizations. Capitol Alliance Group has been working with SCA for three years and continues to identify new workforce housing opportunities throughout the state. The current contract is for 12 months, ending in September 2008 with a monthly fee of $3,000. ▪Ticketmaster – Ticketmaster is the nation’s leading event ticket agency with offices around the world. Capitol Alliance Group assists Ticketmaster by monitoring pending legislation that directly affects the ticket industry, live entertainment and internet commerce. Capitol Alliance Group is also in charge of meeting with policymakers about Ticketmaster’s services, consumer protection and accountability. Another priority of this agreement is to identify new business opportunities with municipalities and other venues around the State of Florida. This contract is indefinite and the fees are $2,500 monthly ▪ZeroChaos – ZeroChaos is Florida’s largest contract labor solutions and vendor management firm. Capitol Alliance Group has been given the task of analyzing current policies and program for state and local governments. After the initial assessment, Capitol Alliance Group will develop recommendations on how client can meet the needs of government agencies. Capitol Alliance Group is also responsible for monitoring and advocating any legislation that would further the business goals of ZeroChaos. ZeroChaos’ current contract runs through February 2009 with a monthly fee of $4,500. Capitol Alliance Group has been working with ZeroChaos since February 2008. A ff ordable Workforce Housing Client Issue Outcome Professional Florida Workforce Housing Alliance 2006 - Workforce Housing Legislation and Appropriations Drafted and passed major Workforce Housing legislation (HB 1375) and budget approval for $50 million in funding for workforce housing. ($50 Million) Je ff rey Sharkey, lead lobbyist Wendover Housing Development 2008 - $5 million funding for workforce housing in Osceola County Drafted and passed budget proviso language to secure $5 million funding for workforce housing in Osceola County. ($5 Million) Je ff rey Sharkey, lead lobbyist City of Key West 2007 – A ff ordable Housing Regulatory relief Passage of legislation to allow local school district and community college to use surplus lands for a ff ordable housing. Je ff rey Sharkey, lead lobbyist City of Key West 2008 – A ff ordable Housing Passage of Legislation allowing for addition Down Payment Assistance for municipalities who reduce or waive impact fees. Je ff rey Sharkey Transportation Client Issue Outcome Professional Port of Palm Beach 2007 - appropriation for Inland Port Intermodal Distribution Center Passage of budget proviso language for $200,000 for planning phase of Inland Port project ($200,000) Je ff rey Sharkey & Richard Pinsky, lead lobbyists Port of Palm Beach 2009 - appropriation for Inland Port Intermodal Distribution Center Passage of budget proviso language for $1,000,000 for planning phase of Inland Port Project ($1,000,000) Je ff rey Sharkey & Richard Pinsky, lead lobbyists Florida Intermodal Transportation Assoc. 2005 - FDOT Strategic Intermodal System plan Drafted and passed major transportation legislation on development of the state’s Strategic Intermodal System plan and funding formula for FDOT’s 5 year work plan. Je ff rey Sharkey, lead lobbyist Florida Airports Council 2004/05 – Florida Airport Grants funding Successful budget appropriation of $92 million (2004) and $104 million (2005) for Florida Airports grants in FDOT budget. ($196 Million) Je ff rey Sharkey, lead lobbyist Public Safety Client Issue Outcome Professional Florida Assoc of Public Safety Communication O ffi cials (EMS) (2008) - Occupational Certification Passage of legislation creating certification standards and training requirements for dispatchers in EMS throughout Florida Richard Pinsky, lead lobbyist Land Use Management Client Issue Outcome Professional Coalition of A ff ordable Housing Providers 2005 – DRI Concurrency and Regulation Passage of legislative language to allow for waiver of Concurrency in DRI requirements for development of a ff ordable housing close to major employment centers. Je ff rey Sharkey, lead lobbyist Criminal Justice/Corrections Client Issue Outcome Professional Community Education Centers/CiviGenics, 2007 - Community Corrections Passage of budget and proviso language to direct FDOC to fund 200 community based work release beds and 1264 community work camp beds ($14 Million) Je ff rey Sharkey, lead lobbyist Property Insurance Client Issue Outcome Professional Florida Association of Housing and Redevelopment O ffi cials 2007 - Property & Casualty Insurance Successful passage of legislation authorizing the creation of Self Insurance fund for Public Housing Authorities and waiver of assessment fees. Richard Pinsky, lead lobbyist Property Tax Reform Client Issue Outcome Professional Shelter Corporation 2007 - Ad Valorem taxation Successful passage of legislation authorizing property appraisers to use rental income approach revised methodology for ad valorem assessment of multifamily a ff ordable housing. Je ff rey Sharkey, lead lobbyist Cit y of Delray Beach - Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Ericks Consultants, Inc . [partnering with Adams St. Advocates ] Contact Information: Candice Ericks @ 954 -648 -1204 or 850 -224 -0880 candice@ericksconsultants.com 1 . Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach David Ericks, President ECI and Partner of Adams St Advocates ; Candice Ericks, Consultant; Claudia Davant, Managing Partner -Adams St Advocates; and Robert Beck, Partner -Adams St Advocates. 2 . List types of additional costs above the annual fee , if any (i.e. travel, printing , etc.) All inclusive , except that for extensive travel, such as with f ederal issues, we would request advance approval for reimbursement of travel expenses. 3 . Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: YES! a. Lobby State Legislature Yes b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes c. Lobby local and other agencies (i.e. Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). Yes, the entire team can lobby those and other agencies with the exception of Candice Ericks who cannot lobby Palm Beach County. d . Meet regularly with City elected official s and/or staff (i.e., in - person, conference call, etc.) Yes e . Develop City’s state legislative agenda Yes f . Provide weekly legislative updates during session Yes g . Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes 4 . Does your firm provide federal lobbying services? If so, please describe. We have strong relationships at the federal level and have assisted our clients with federa l issues. a. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, please describe the type of assistance that may be available. M any issues that we deal with at a st ate level are contingent on various Federal components. For example, w e have worked for years collectively with clients such as Broward County, Palm Beach County, other cities, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority and JM Family on issues that require federal cooperation to succeed on a state or local level. W e have worked on transportation issues with Congressman Mica from Florida [Chairman], Congressman Shuster of Pennsylvania [next Chairman] and Subcommittee Chair Congressman Sa m Graves of Missouri. As most of the Flori da Congressional Delegation began their political careers in the Florida Legislature, we have already worked wi th them for years at the state level. We have also worked closely with the Administration for Children &AFamilies’A ssistantA Secretary, George Sheldon, who served as the Secretary of the Florida Department of Children & Family Services before leaving for DC. b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partner s with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. We have relationships with various firms and would help the city team with whichever firm would be most effective depending on the specific issue being addressed . 5 . Pro vide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session , and provide a summary of the final result. Crime Lab Funding Crime lab funding was aApriorityAforAtheABrowardACountyASheriff’sAOfficeA and Broward County for the last few years. Flor ida has five crime labs located in Broward, Palm Beach, Miami -Dade, Indian River and Pinellas Counties that were underfunded by the state. Prior to the 2012 legislative session, statutory authority allowed but did not require judges to impose an additional penalty to increase the funding for crime labs when they were used in the successful prosecution of a defendant. Invoking this additional fine was rarely imposed and it was not uniformly applied.AAThisAcreatedAsignificantAshortfallsAthatAtheASheriff’sAofficeAandA the County then had to subsidize with local funding. Efforts led by ECI throughout 2010 and 2011 culminated in successful changes to mandate cri me lab fees in 2012 legislation. Specifically, language was passed that would require a $100 fee to be mandated when a person was convicted of a crime and the local crime lab was utilized. ThroughAECI’sAstrongArelationshipsAwithAtheABrowardAdelegation, support for the language to change the statute was garnered early in the process. This support resulted in Senator Bogdanoff (who was essential in previous efforts) committing to making it a priority during Budget negotiations. ECI worked tirelessly thr oughout the appropriations process attending all Budget meetings and worked alongside Senator Bogdanoff to gain the support of both the House and Senate leadership to secure the House acceptance of the mandatory $100 fee language. We were successful in ge tting the House to accept the language and Senate Conforming Bill 1968 passed both the House and Senate unanimously. Our understanding is that this language will provide an estimated $5 Million funding for the crime labs. However,AourAworkAwasAnotAfinishedAatASession’sAend.A During the veto periodAweAworkedAdiligentlyAwithAtheAGovernor’sAOfficeAtoAanswerA questions and educate them on the user fee funding source contained in the legislation. Our arguments were persuasive and the bill was ultimately approved by the Governor. Medical Examiner s During the 2011 Legislative Session ECI facilitated a meeting with the Director of Government Relations for the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, regarding allowing our me dical examiners to be given direct access to the DAVID database [Driver & Vehicle Informatio n Database] for the purpose of determining the identification of a deceased individual . ThisAdatabaseAcontainsAaAmotorist’sAidentifyingAandA emergency contact inform ation . The agency was concerne d about the number of examiners who would be allowed to gain access. We had multiple meetings that resulted in the DHSMV signing off on agreed upon language that would limit the access points to the database as well as includi ng an inter local agreemen t. Unfortunately, time was an issue and we agreed with the sponsor to wait until the following year to pursue the change. With the groundwork already set we started the 2012 Session touching base with DHSMV to make sure the Depar tment was still supportive of our efforts. After being given the green light and we immediately met with the House sponsor, Representative Albritton a nd his staff, to explain why Medical Examiners should have direct access to the DAVID database. He under stood our concerns but also made it clear that only language that was agreed on by both sponsors (House and Senate) would make it into the final cut of the legislative package. We had our marching orders and went directly to Senator Latvala's office and m et with his staff to explain at length the need we saw for direct access to the database and why we should be included in the legislation. From that point we were on constant follow -up with both offices up until the strike -all amendment was made public . O ur language ultimately passed allowingAtheAstate’sAMedicalAExaminersAaccessAtoAthisAmuchAneededA identification tool. Both of these bills are examples of our sustained , successful efforts on behalf of our clients. ERICKS CONSULTANTS, INC. Governmental Consulting City of Delray Beach Submitted 10/1 1 /2012 205 South Adams Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 850 -224 -0880 - 1 - Introduction ................................................................................................................................ - 2 - Expertise and Experience ............................................................................................................ - 7 - Appropriations ............................................................................................................................ - 9 - Federal ........................................................................................................................................ - 9 - Execution ................................................................................................................................... - 10 - Some Examples of Successes .................................................................................................... - 12 - Price Proposal ........................................................................................................................... - 20 - Closing ....................................................................................................................................... - 20 - Appendix 1 – ECI Client List ....................................................................................................... - 21 - Appendix II – Professional References ...................................................................................... - 28 - - 2 - It is with great pleasure that Ericks Consultants, Inc. (ECI) teaming with Adams St. Advocates (ASA), submits the following proposal to represent the City of Delray Beac h on matters of governmental affairs before the Florida Legislature, Cabinet and executive branch agencies, as well as assisting on Federal matters. Our experience provides us with a keen understanding of the issues that local governments face as well as an understanding of new initiatives that the City will undertake. With vast experience representing local governments, we understand that legislative representation is critical to your success. We as a team offer unparalleled knowledge and experience in the political process, gained from years of direct participation. Through experience, dedication, knowledge of the political process and strong relationships, ECI is a highly effective full -service governmental consulting firm representing both corpora te and public entity clients with legislative and state agency issues. Equipped with an in -depth knowledge of Florida government, we are trained to interact with all state and local agencies, legislative committees and executive staff. ECI has joined forc es with ASA to form an extremely strong alliance in the political arena toAmeetAtheACityAofADelrayABeach’sAcurrentAandAfutureAgoals,AADavidAEricksAhasAbeenAaAgovernmentA consultant since 1980. Candice Ericks joined the firm in 1998. Marty Cassini joined as general counsel 2009,AASinceAitsAfoundingAinA1985.AEricksAConsultants.AInc,AhasArepresentedAsomeAofAFlorida’sAtopA corporationsAandAlargestAassociationsAandAhasAsecuredAaAplaceAinAFlorida’sApoliticalAarenaAatAbothAtheA state, county and municipal levels of g overnment. ECI has offices one block from the Capitol in downtown Tallahassee and in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. ASA is a Florida -basedAconsultingAfirm.AestablishedAinAresponseAtoAtoday’sAfluidAeconomicAandApoliticalA landscapes. ASA is a forward thinking, client centered group that provides extensive management experience in both the private and public sectors. ASA is passionate about helping clients reach their goals through a collaborative effort, all the while remaining focused on their needs from beginning to end. Simply, Adams Street Advocates, as the name implies, are advocates -willing and ready to be part ofAaAteamAthatAwillAchampionAtheACityAofADelrayABeach’sApriorities,AAWhileArecentlyAformedA - its team members, as discussed in more deta il later in this proposal, have a long history at all levels in state and local government. Together they are a collective force committed to excellence and will work endlessly to achieve the results not only the City desires, but deserves. We have extens ive knowledge and expertise in dealing with our South Florida Environment, specifically transportation, energy, public safety, solid waste, growth management, beach renourishment, rail, airports, seaports and tourism. We currently represent the City of Co conut Creek [almost 6 years] the City of Coral Springs [12 years] the City of North Lauderdale [since 2009 and previously represented], the City of Pembroke Pines [for over 6 years], the Town of Davie [cumulatively almost 6 years], the City of Plantation [more than 7 years] and recently the City of Fort Lauderdale. We have represented the Cities of Hollywood and Pembroke Park in the past. We also represent Broward County [over 15 years] and Palm Beach County [over 6 years]. We believe that the experience ga ined from representing these local governments provides us the capability and understanding to meet the needs of the City of Delray Beach. Please meet the members of Ericks Consultants, Inc. (ECI) - 3 - DAVID ERICKS is founder and President of Ericks Consultan ts, Inc. Dave moved to Fort Lauderdale when he was 13 years old and graduated from Stranahan High School. After returning from College at C.W. Post (Long Island University) on a football scholarship he took a position as a police officer with the City of Plantation, which transitioned him into the world of Florida politics. Dave Ericks has been a registered lobbyist in the State of Florida for almost 30 years, starting with his representation of the State of Florida Fraternal Order of Police while at the City of Plantation Police Department in 1980. Mr. EricksAwasAaAregisteredAlobbyistAforAtheABrowardACountyASheriff’sADepartment.AtheADepartmentAofA Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles and the 3M Corporation before founding Ericks Consultants, Inc. in 1985. P rior to establishing his own firm, Mr. Ericks was employed by the 3M Corporation as Regional Administrator and Registered Lobbyist in Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama. Mr. Ericks served as Senior Executive Assistant to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Administrative ssistantAtoAtheABrowardACountyASheriffAandAservedAonAtheACityAofAPlantationAPoliceAForce,AMr,AEricks’A past experience allowed him the opportunity to work with various police and criminal justice organizations, in cluding the Steering Committee for Constitutional Amendments and the State Law Enforcement Job Task Advisory Committee for the Florida Police Standards and Training Commission. He has also represented members statewide as the President of the Fraternal Ord er of Police. His service in those positions has given him both law enforcement and administrative expertise at the local, county and state levels. Moreover, since establishing Ericks Consultants in 1985, Mr. Ericks has represented a multi -faceted group of clients, giving him a wide array of expertise in multiple subject areas, including the electric and telecommunication utilities, law enforcement, entertainment, healthcare, travel, corrections, solid waste, growth management, automobile, gaming, and trans portation industries; as well as in the many diverse issues which face local governments on a day to day basis. Dave is a pioneer member of the Florida Association of Professional Lobbyists. Dave served as Chairman of the Tallahassee Downtown Improvement Authority for 3 years and currently serves on the Board. He presently serves on the Advisory Board of Keiser Universi ty’sATallahasseeACampusAandApreviouslyAservedA as a Board Member of the Florida State Fair Authority. Dave received his B.A. Degree from Long Island University and earned his Master of Science Degree in Criminal Justice from Nova University. He is also a graduateAofAtheAF,B,I,A cademy’sALawASpecialistASchoolA in Quantico, Virginia and has taught as an Adjunct Faculty Member for Nova University. Mr. Ericks resides in Tallahassee, Florida. CANDICE ERICKS is a consultant with Ericks Consultants, Inc., based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Candice was born in Broward County and grew up in the City of Plantation. Prior to joining the firm 14 years ago, Candice began her career in corporate sales in New York City, specializing in outdoor advertising and temporar y staffing. Upon her return from Manhattan in 1998, Candice opened the Fort Lauderdale branch of Ericks Consultants, Inc. Candice has developed an extensive network of contacts and relationships within state and local governments and the business community and works closely withAtheAfirm’sASouthAFloridaAbasedAclients,ADueAtoAherAworkAwithAanAextensiveAarrayAofAclients.ACandiceA has developed broad expertise in numerous subject areas. Candice is active in many charitable organizations and serves as a Board Member of ChildNet, a not -for - profit organization working to protect Broward County's abused, neglected and abandoned children; the Florida Association of Professional Lobbyists (term ending January 2010), an organization committed to establishing and mai ntaining high standards for the lobbying profession; and Broward Days, an - 4 - independent, nonprofit and nonpartisan group of people advocating for diverse needs and concerns of Broward County, Florida. CandiceAwasAaAmemberAofALeadershipABroward’sAClassAofA XXV, an organization that seeks to prepare members for leadership roles in their community. Candice was also recently featured by Gold Coast MagazineAasAoneAofABrowardACounty’sAleadingAyoungAprofessionalsA]40AUnderA40[AwhoAwereArecognizedA for their profess ional and civic involvement in Broward County. Candice worked with Ericks Consultants, Inc. while attending Florida State University and interned during the 1994 Legislative Session in the Florida Senate. She graduated with a Public Relations and Polit ical Science degree from Florida State University. Candice Ericks resides in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. MARTY CASSINI was born in Miami and subsequently raised in Miami Shores. He attended Miami Country Day School for most of his young life and then went on to Barry University. While at Barry, MartyAearnedAaABachelorAofAScienceAinASociologyAwithAaAminorAinAHistoryAandAalsoAplayedAonAtheAMen’sA Soccer team. After college, Marty moved to Alpharetta, Georgia. He worked for the well -respected real estate firm McCalla Raymer. During his time there, Marty administered many real estate transactions and gained a deep love for the law and moved back to South Florida to attend Nova Southeastern Law School. In 2006, Marty graduated from Nova and immediately became policy adviser and legal counsel to the Florida Senate Minority Leader. With such an opportunity, Marty acquired an in depth knowledge base of many different subject matters, including local government, gaming, insurance, health care, transportation and tax issues. Marty worked with various stakeholders on a variety of subjects. Most notably, he was involved in the property insurance rewrite of 2007, gaming bills that expanded poker rooms and slots machines at pari - mutuels, stem cell research invest ments, Sun Rail, removal of the affordable housing fund cap, the property tax rollback and ad valorem assessment changes, voluntary condominium termination, and high occupancy vehicle travel for hybrid cars . Since 2009, Marty has collaborated with Ericks Consultants Inc. on an array of different issues but concentrates mainly on local government, tax and gaming issues. With his legal and policy background, Marty is the analytical arm of the firm, providing detailed and in -depth reviews of all legislation m oving through the process. He drafts bills and amendments and he also creates comprehensive policy initiatives. Marty offers insight and guidance on how policy changes affect the firm's clients. Marty is also a practicing attorney in the areas of corpora te, business and finance law as well as local government law. Marty has served as counsel for campaigns, political action committees and other political groups. Marty serves as pro bono counsel to a local developmentally disabled school and has also lobbie d pro bono for Autism related initiatives. Marty has also served as in -house counsel for campaigns, political action committees and other political groups. JANET MORRIS is the Office Manager for Ericks Consultants and works out of the Tallahassee office. Janet has an in -depth knowledge of the operation of the Florida Legislature and state government. Janet - 5 - retired from the Florida House of Representatives in 2006 as a Senior Legislative Analyst in the Committee on Business Regulation. In her capacity on c ommittee staff, Janet was responsible for the analysis of legislation dealing with alcohol, tobacco, general business and all gaming venues [lottery, pari -mutuels, slots, etc.]. Prior to her service on the Business Regulation Committee staff, Janet served as an Executive Assistant to the Speaker of the House and Majority Leader. Please meet your team from Adams St. Advocates (ASA) DAVID ERICKS is one of the founding partners of Adams St. Advocates. In addition to Dave, other foundin g partners that will be dedicated to your issues incl ude Claudia Davant, Robert Beck and Tanya Jackson. CLAUDIA DAVANT , Managing Partner, was the former Managing Partner of NSI, Florida where she lead the national firm's Florida practice for almost 4 yea rs. While there she built a broad multi -client practice that included information technology, local government, telecommunications, transportation, gaming, appropriations, healthcare, aging, education, environmental issues with a niche practice around proc urement driven clients and sales/business development strategy. She has extensive experience in government and private sectors. Prior to NSI, Claudia was on the national business development team for Accenture, a global information technology firm, whe re she led sales campaigns for large, complex integrated systems opportunities. At Accenture she was also responsible for government relations in Florida as well as many other states and worked closely with government entities at both the state and local level in that role. Claudia moved to Florida in 2000 as AT&T's State President for Regulatory and Legislative Affairs where she worked hand in hand with key decision makers in both the Florida legislative and executive branches for 5 years. She subseq uently was promoted to Regional Vice President for Legislative Affairs for AT&T where she successfully led legislative and regulatory reform campaigns in the Southern Region before the merger with BellSouth. In addition to her corporate experience, Claudi a worked in government on bothAtheAstateAandAfederalAlevels,AASheAservedAasAU,S,ASenatorAStromAThurmond’sALegislativeA ideAinA Washington, D.C. for 3 years providing legislative analysis, constituent service and external communications. As a Policy Advisor to the Michigan House of Representatives, she led the staff effort to rewrite the Michigan Telecommunications Act. And as General Counsel and Communications Director for the South Carolina Department of Commerce, she negotiated economic development incen tives with corporations wanting to do business with the state. Claudia currently serves on the Associated Industries of Florida (AIF) IT Council, Florida TaxWatch Board’sAExecutiveASteeringACommitteeAandABoard.AtheATakeAStockAinAChildrenABoardAandAtheAFl orida Afterschool Network Board. One of only nine recipients nationwide, she was recently honored by the fterschoolA llianceAasAFlorida’sA fterschoolAChampionAofAtheAYearAatAtheA“BreakfastAofAChampions”AinA Washington, DC. A South Carolina native, Claudi a earned her BA from the University of South Carolina Honors College and Law degree from the University of South Carolina. ROBERT BECK brings unique and invaluable skills in public and private sector budgeting and appropriations, assisting our clients to build effective business cases that resonate with government decision -makers and procurement evaluation teams. Having served in senior roles in government - 6 - including Staff Director of Senate Appropriations, Budget Director for the Governor of the State of Florida, Policy Advisor to the Senate President on Appropriations, Medicaid, and General Government, Robert has leveraged his extensive public sector experience to position private sector clients to effectively compete and win multiple agency procurements since reentering the private sector in 2008. Robert’sAexperienceAinAhealthAcare.AcriminalAjustice.AandAextensiveAexperienceAwithAMedicaidAhasAallowedA him to effectively assist his clients in developing value propositions and procurement opportunities th at resonateAinAtoday’sAfiscallyAchallengingAenvironmentAwhereAagenciesAareAcontinuallyAconfrontedAwithAaA growing workload and shrinking resources to meet these demands. Robert effectively leverages his executive branch relationships, having served in the Departments of Elder Affairs, Children & Families, Agriculture, Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, and Management Services to create opportunities and interest by state agency stakeholders through effective communication and knowledge of agency needs. Robe rt understands the importance of effective business cases and sound return on investment analyses in a state government market that is becoming more and more driven to operate like a business, increase efficiency and reduce costs. Robert leverages his dee p relationships in government and combines these relationships with solid business skills to create opportunities and encourage state government stakeholders to pursue them as good public policy. JIM HENRY has been involved with state government for over forty years. The last ten years he was with The Department of Children & Families as Legislative Director – most recently for Secretary Wilkins. There he coordinated the full legislative package including budget and all substantive program areas. He al soAservedAonAtheAdepartment’sAexecutiveAleadershipAteam,AA Before that he was legislative coordinator for The Florida Lottery for four years under then Governor Jeb Bush. Jim also was the executive director and lobbyist for The Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers. He came to Tallahassee in 1971 and stared to work as staff director in the Florida legislature both in the Senate and House of Representatives. This unique alliance between ECI and ASA offers the City of Delray Beach a proven, dedicated and resp ected South Florida based team, as well as a seasoned Tallahassee based team that works and lives in Tallahassee year round. Combining the intimate knowledge of the South Florida based team with the Tallahassee year round presence is invaluable and critic al to the City. Many committee, administrative and rule making hearings and other important meetings take place outside of the legislative calendar. Having the ECI/ASA dual representation allows for firsthand knowledge and insight into what is happening throughout the year and the direct effects it may have on the City. In these tough economic times the regulatory and administrative process is equally important as the legislative process. Environmental permitting issues, economic development incentives and the process of determining the economic impact of unfounded mandates are just a few examples of issues that agencies address throughout the year. We are aware of the importance of economic incentives to the City of Delray Beach and our team has solid relationships with the Department of Economic Opportunity, as well as Appropriations in both the House and the Senate. - 7 - Our experience and knowledge, combined with our strong relationships throughout the Legislature, allows us to cover a lot of ground within the legislative process. Our capabilities are supported by in - house legal counsel and interns, as well as an extremely seasoned Office Manager with 30 years of experience in the legislative process. We pride ourselves on effic ient coordination and organization that allows us to handle numerous tasks for multiple clients simultaneously. We believe that our long -term relationships with the majority of our clients are indicative of our past performance. In addition, ASA brings anotherAteamAtoAtheAtableAtoAchampionAtheACityAofADelrayABeach’sAefforts.AwithAadditionalAexpertsA in the consulting and lobbying fields. Session moves fast and decisions and legislation changes quickly so having a large team at the capitol every day and l iving in Tallahassee during session is invaluable to your representation and success. Another advantage to having a team that lives in Tallahassee during Session is that travel has become so costly and difficult many members of the Legislature and staff s pend their weekends in Tallahassee which provides additional opportunities to spend time with decision makers while the decisions are actually happening. Our approach will be an informed and educated one. Our relationships with leadership in both the Hous e and the Senate afford us the knowledge of what the Legislature will be focused on and an insight into what their challenges will be. We will proactively develop a strategy to successfully integrate the City’sAneedsAintoAtheAoverallAplanAforAtheALegislatu re’sAplan,AAA sAsoonAasAprioritiesAareAidentifiedAweAwillA immediately secure bill sponsors for general or special legislation if needed, in addition to educating our local delegation. ECI has a reputation for working within the legal and ethical guidelines of the political world. Experience and personal relationships give us the ability to organize strong political support for ourAclients’Aissues.AoppositionAtoAamendmentsAthatAareAdisadvantageousAtoAourAclients.AandAsponsorshipA of legislation that is vital toAourAclient’sAagenda,AReputation.Aaccess.AandAexpertiseAisAtheAstrengthAofAtheA ECI/ASA Team. ECI is uniquely situated by having a Tallahassee -based firm with an extremely active South Florida office, bothAequippedAtoArespondAtoAclients’Aneeds,AAThisAdua l presence allows constant visibility in both the southern and northern regions of the state. Our firm is fortunate to have very good relationships with both sides of the political aisle, which allows ECI to represent our clients in a highly effective man ner. Term limits have made it such that there is no longer an off season from the legislative session. We at ECI spend the entire year in close contact with Legislators and their staff regarding interim projects, campaigns and possible legislation for th e upcoming year. In addition, we continue to focus on leadership in both chambers, and of course, the strength of our tri -county delegations. We believe that being present at all times when decision makers and their staff are physically at the capital is vital to yourArepresentation,AKnowingAthatAECIA“lives”AatAtheACapitolAduringAtheAlegislativeAsessionAisAtoAtheAcity’sA benefit. We believe that our most effective resources are those relationships that we have formed over the years. We take pride in the fac t that we have outstanding professional and personal relationships with Legislators from both parties and their staffs, the Governor ’s office, with Cabinet officers and staff, and with key decision makers in state agencies. In fact, during a recent team p lanning meeting the ECI/ASA team went through the organizational charts of every executive branch agency and determined that we have good relationships and access to every agency! This access will be invaluable to the City for any and every issue that need s to be addressed. The Florida Association of Professional Lobbyists [FAPL] was created to provide on -going training and professional development and is committed to promoting the highest ethical standards of professional - 8 - conduct among its membership. David Ericks is a pioneer member of the Association and Candice Ericks has served on its Board of Directors for several years and has recently been reappointed. ECI values its professional reputation and has spent years cultivating trust -based relationsh ips within Palm Beach County and state government. ECI has a strong relationship with each member of the Palm Beach County Delegation and staff. We are confident that each current member of the Delegation is comfortable working with ECI. With elections ar ound the corner and qualifying over we are now spending our time getting to know all of the candidates that may become new members of the Delegation. We historically attend the annual Florida League of Cities and Florida Association of Counties statewide and legislative conferences. ECI is also a member of Florida Association of Intergovernmental Relations (FAIR). Being a member of this group affords us the opportunity to utilize an additional resource. During Session this group meets twice a week to dis cuss and strategize on all Legislation that will affect your City, whether it be transportation, growth management, public safety etc. We have been a member of this group for many years and through this we have cultivated many working relationships and cl ose ties between different levels of government. This participation enhances our knowledge and understanding of the challenges and trends that face South Florida cities, as well as municipalities across the state. We work particularly close with the Flori da League of Cities and Association of Counties during the Legislative Session. It is especially beneficial to the citizens of the City of Delray Beach that ECI and ASA have enduring relationships with House and Senate leadership. As you know, the Legisl ature and the Governor ’s office is led by an overwhelming majority if Republicans and we maintain strong relationships with the Majority Party in Tallahassee at both the Legislative and Executive Branch levels. Only a couple of committee chairman and lead ership roles have been announced for the new Senate President Gaetz or incoming House Speaker Weatherford. However, we are confident that based on our current relationships we will be well positioned regardless of which members will be appointed to key po sitions. For the ones who have been announced, such as the House Appro p riations Chairman and the Senate Pro Tem, we have very good trust based relationships with those members. Currently we have solid relationships with the Incoming Senate President and S peaker, as well as their recently announced Chiefs of Staff. As for South Florida, we are well positioned with the Senate Minority Leader Chris Smith and House Minority Leader Perry Thurston. Both Senator Smith and Representative Thurston have worked clo selyAwithAECIAthroughoutAtheAyears,AWhileAtheAGovernor’sAofficeAisAcurrentlyAtransitioningAtoAaA new Chief of Staff, we have close relationships with key deputies as well as decision makers and key influencersAinAtheAGovernor’sAOfficeAofAPolicyAandABudgetA(OPB). Our ability to represent our clients is reflected in the duration and loyalty of our business relationships throughout the State of Florida. ECI has a history of familiarizing themselves and forming strong, professional relationships with the membe rs of city and county commissions, the Florida Legislature, cabinet offices, state agencies and staff. ECI has the proven ability to recognize the changing trends in the corporate and political worlds and uses those skills to organize, monitor, maneuver an d communicate between government and client, giving both the comfort of understanding and the ability to offer compromise. - 9 - Our team is also actively engaged in Associated Industries of Florida (AIF) and other business related lobbying organizations so th at we understand what the business priorities are for the Legislative Session and how they will impact the City of Delray Beach. Being successful in the Appropriations process today requires an effective strategy that builds a compelling business case to support your appropriations request. Our team will work with you to build effective business cases needed to support your appropr iations issues. The competition for state fundingAhasAbeenAnothingAbutAfierceAforAtheApastA6AyearsAdueAtoAFlorida’sArevenueAchallengesA – for six years in a row, state revenue collections have been insufficient to fund base budget expenditures. The need to develop a high -levelA‘returnAonAinvestment’AanalysisAtoAsupportAyourAappropriation’sAprioritiesA will also be key and we will work with your team to develop the business case needed to support your appropriations priorities. As your advocate and consultan t in Tallahassee and back at home in South Florida, our focus will be on our communication, knowledge, expertise, ability and relationships to assist the City of Delray Beach with current priorities, as well as planning and laying the ground work for futu re goals. We understand the needs and challenges that local governments face on a daily basis and the challenges of planning in tough economic times. Our goal in supporting and advocating on behalf of theACityAofADelrayABeach’sAappropriationsAprioritiesA will always be to present a strategic, compelling, and focused message that differentiates and positions your appropriations requests. ECI has in depth knowledge of the state appropriations process and has been successful in obtaining line item appropri ations for our clients. However, the addition of Robert Beck to our roster brings an extraordinary insight and experience to the ECI Team. Robert is uniquely qualified in the legislative appropriations arena having been an appropriations staff director for the Florida Senate. In addition, Beck held the role of chief policy advisor on appropriations for the Florida Senate President in 2004 and 2005. In addition to his legislative appropriations experience, Beck has held senior executive appointments in budge tAleadershipAactingAasAtheAGovernor’sAbudgetAdirectorAunderAGovernorACristAandA also holding the budget director jobs for other executive branch agencies. Beck brings the most solid experience in state budgeting and legislative appropriations possible to ac hieveAthisAclient’sAgoals,ABeckA provides a level of knowledge to the appropriations process which has helped him to achieve results in multiple policy areas including health care -specifically home and community care for seniors, Medicaid, criminal justice, technology, education and transportation. Our team will provide continuous assistance throughout the budget process, advocating for full -funding ofAtheACity’sAprojectArequests,AAPleaseAnoteAthatAMr,ABeckAwithA S AhasAextensiveAknowledgeAofAtheA Florida budget process and has proven to work successf ully within the extremely complicated appropriations world. In addition, we will also identify relevant funding opportunities and assist with grant requests. Keep in mind that many opportunities come up outside of the timeframe of the regularly scheduled Session and having a full -time extended team living in Tallahassee continuing to work at the Capitol is key. Members of our team will continue to work throughout the year with the Florida League of Cities and the Palm Beach League of Cities to review the ir policies. We will also maintain follow -up and appreciation correspondence throughout the process when appropriate. - 10 - Please be aware that out team has very strong relationships at the Federal level. In addition, many issues that we deal with a t a state level are contingent on the Federal components. We have worked for years collectively with clients such as Broward County, Palm Beach County, other cities, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority and JM Family on issues that require fede ral cooperation to succeed on a state or local level. We are very familiar with coordinating efforts with our Congressional Delegation, as well as other members from around the state to achieve the desired goals . As most of the Florida Congressional Deleg ation came from the Florida Legislature , we ha ve worked with them for years. For example, w e have worked on transportation issues with Congressman Mica from Florida [Chairman], Congressman Shuster of Pennsylvania [next Chairman] and Subcommittee Chair Cong ressman Sam Graves of Missouri. We have also worked closely with the Administration for Children &AFamilies’A ssistantASecretary.AGeorgeASheldon , who served as the Secretary of the Florida Department of Children & Family Services before leaving for DC. Areas of representation for th e City of Delray Beach, will include but will not be limited to: transient or vacation rental issues; community residential group homes [sober homes]; economic opportunities; financial incentives; energy; beach nourish ment; transportation; communications services tax; pensions; and local preemptions. We are familiar with the transient rental issue and the history of the legislation that was passed. Our team has excellent working relationships with all parties involve d including Senator Evers and representativesAofAtheAVacationARentalAManagers’A ssociation,AFromAourArecentAconversations we understand the challenges regarding this issue but believe that we can be an effective advocate for the City’sAposition, It is important to point out that, especially regarding to the sober homes issue, our team has an extremely close trust -based relationshi p with the Department of Children and Family Services, the Florida League of Cities , and the discussed potential sponsors in the House and Senate. We plan to collaborate ourAeffortsAonAtheAcity’s behalf with both the Palm Beach League of Cities and the Florida League of Cities who are making this the top prior i ty for this legislative session. ECI, along with ASA, will provide u nparalleled representation to the City of Delray Beach. We will work closely with the Mayor, Vice -Mayor, Deputy Vice -Mayor, Commissioners, City Manager and staff in the coordination and development of the annual legislative agenda and appropriations reques ts, including holding workshops as necessary. Once the agenda and budget priorities are set we will then identify key legislators.AasAwellAasAstaffAinAtheAGovernor’sAOffice.AtheACabinetAandAexecutiveAbranchAagenciesAregardingA our specific legislative and budget priorities. We will then continue to develop and implement strategy on proposed special or general legislation in coordination with the Palm Beach County Legislative Delegation. Our team will be involved in drafting and analyzing proposed legislat ion, developing strategies and recommending amendments as necessary. ECI will create white papers, talking points or other educational documents to distribute to members as needed on important issues. We will arrange initial educational/ informational meet ings amongst staff and members of the Legislature and executive branch agencies and will facilitate follow -up meetings as the priorities move through the legislative session. Members of our team will continuously track legislation throughout Committee wee ks and Session, monitoring all state legislative committee meetings and agency hearings prior to, during and after Session and testifying as needed. - 11 - Our approach will be an informed and educated one. ECI is a committed consulting/lobbying firm that acts as an extended arm of our clients in every aspect. Whether it is on a state, local or federal issue, ECI works closely with each client to identify their specific needs. We recognize that each client has unique assets and needs and has their own style f or achievement reports and distribution of workload. Many of our clients are team -based; therefore, the responsibilities, as well as the efforts, are shared. In other cases.AweAareAaAclient’sAsoleArepresentation,AMembersAofAourAfirmAwillAbeAavailableAa t all times via phone, text, fax, or email to maintain vital lines of communication throughout Legislative Committee weeks and Session. One of our strengths is the ability to take large amounts of information and present it to the City of Delray Beach e very committee week or week during session. With two attorneys on the ECI/ASA team bills and policy changes are given very thorough analyses and reviews. You will receive informative and concise reports on policy matters that will detail any negative or positive effects from any particular piece of legislation. We have staff dedicated to bill tracking and reporting, updates, legislative intent, and answering any questions you may have. ECI believes that communication is the most valuable component of a client/lobbyist relationship and is the key to their mutual success. Insight and ongoing communication between the lobbyist and the client provides a better understanding of exactly what the client wants, allowing us to be successful in achieving the desir ed result. ECI will provide written reports and updates on a regular basis, during both the legislative session and the interim, on those issues and concerns identified by the City. During Session, the City will receive official weekly reports, as well as phone calls and emails during the week as needed,AInAtheseAweeklyAreportsAtheACityAwillAreceiveAupdatesAonAtheACity’sApriorities.AotherAlegislationA that City should be aware of, the overall political climate, anticipated action for the upcoming week and a suggested action plan if needed. In addition, ECI will continuously apprise the City of developing initiatives of which we believe the City should be aware, and will submit a status report on priority issues one week prior to the end of Session. At the close of Session, ECI will submit a priority report and soon after a thorough end -of -session report on specific legislation and new requirements effecting the City. Also note that should there be a specific issue that needs detailed research, we have done and will do that for our clients. We will provide that privileged information to decide on the best strategic approach with options. For example; what cities, businesses, and other legislatures are doing in other states on a particular issue. After session we would like to come to the City to talk about what transpired. Prior to the start of Interim Committee Meetings, we would like to conduct a workshop with the Mayor, Vice -Mayor, Deputy Vice -Mayor, Commissioners, City Manager and staff to discuss what has happened in the interim and what we should expect to see in the upcoming session. This will lead us into developing the Legislative Agenda for the year to come. Our team takes pride in the fact that we are in constant communication with our clients, wheth er it be at community events, through reports and correspondence or by phone. Although the hustle and bustle of Tallahassee calms down when session is over, we know that the City will constantly have issues with proposed bills, rule -making, administrative bodies, court cases and perhaps even issues between the state and federal government. Administrative agencies routinely promulgate new and revised rules/regulations. Ericks Consultants, Inc . and Adams St. Advocates constantly monitors the development of these proposes rules which are developed via a formal “rules hearing process ” under Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. During these rule workshops, we work with the StateAtoAensureAourAclient’sAinterestsAareAnotAundulyAburdenedAbyAaAnewlyAproposed/revisedAru le. During the course of rule promulgation, we analyze the proposed policies for client impact – from a legal, - 12 - operational, and fiscal impact – and provide public testimony during the rule -making process to shape the final outcome. S outh Florida Regional Transportation Authority For historic background, almost ten years ago ECI was instrumental in helping to pass legislation which transformed the Tri -County Commuter Rail Authority (TriRail) into the South Florida Regional Tran sportation Authority (SFRTA.) The new Authority was created with a vision to provide greater mobility in South Florida, thereby improving the economic viability and quality of life of the community, region and state. The ECI Team was instrumental in the passage of major legislation that gave the Authority the power to issue.AreissueAorAredeemAbonds,AAThroughAECI’sAefforts.AtheAbillAprovidedAforAdiscretionaryAbondingAabilityA and gave the Authority the potential to receive matching funds of at least $45 mil lion if Broward, Miami - Dade and Palm Beach counties imposed a local -option funding source. This provision guaranteed that a dedicated funding source, either from the state, counties and/or a local -option funding source, was always available to the Authori ty. Throughout 2008 and 2009, ECI worked with the SFRTA team to educate the legislature and other key executive agency decision makers on the critical need for additional dedicated funding. In December 2009, the Florida Legislative Special Session culm inated in successfully gaining Legislative approval for additional funding; specifically, the Legislature appropriated an additional $15 million a year for five years to close the gap needed to run a full complement of 50 trains which directly benefits not just the counties but also the City of Ft. Lauderdale. This funding was critical to the on -going operation of the rail and picks up the shortfall caused by reduced funding from the county. The Team successfully secured an additional $1 million in fundi ng during the 2010 Legislative Session. With a state budget short fall of over $4 Billion, any increase in funding was a monumental accomplishment. During the 2012 Legislative Session, Legislation was introduced to dramatically change the governance of th e SFRTA Board based on recommendations by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). It would have eliminated the three local representatives currently on the Board and provided for the ability to completely privatize the agency. After weeks of int ense lobbying, a compromise was negotiated between SFRTA , FDOT and the Governor ’s office to preserve the local representation and allowAtheAGovernorAadditionalArepresentationAwithoutAjeopardizingASFRT ’sAoperatingAauthority,AAThisA amendment required a complicated legislative strategy that was successfully implemented in multiple committee meetings on multiple legislative vehicles, floor support and passage. Ultimately, HB 599 was signed by the Governor and ECI is proud of the teamwork between SFRTA, Br oward, Miami -Dade and PalmABeach,AAThisAhugeAundertakingAthatAaffectedAmultipleAcountiesAclearlyAdemonstratesAECI’sA leadership abilities to lead on complicated political and policy issues directly affecting local government. JM Family Enterprises - 13 - Histori cally, ECI has fought franchise legislation that would be harmful to the operation of JM Family Enterprises (Southeast Toyota). In the automobile industry, JM is unique in the sense that although they are a distributor, they also own a dealership. JM Famil y has a wonderful business relationship with its dealers, however, when it comes to franchise legislation JM normally takes the manufacturer stance. Overall, ECI has been successful in defeating franchise language or in negotiating legislation that is less injurious to JM Family. For example, during the 2009 legislative session there was a push to enact legislation that would have made it virtually impossible for a dealer to ever relocate. The language would also have nullified a provision requiring a franc hisee to maintain and honor facility improvements that were in place through an already negotiated franchise agreement. ECI was successful in stripping the offensive language out of the bill on the last day of Session. Energy With the assistance of Sena tor Bogdanoff and Representative Moraitis, we were successful in amending both the House and Senate versions of the Energy Legislation (HB 7117) to include the words "commercial property". Adding this language expanded the ability of local governments to partner with commercial properties to further energy efficient projects which benefits local business and improves energy consumption. The energy legislation is an initiative, backed by the Commissioner of Agriculture, which would extend $16 million doll ars of tax credits for renewable energy. The bill also makes a number of changes to energy laws to streamline and help implement a renewable energy plan state -wide. In addition to expanding the ability for biofuel permits the bill allows utilities to rec over costs from consumers if the PSC makes such a determination after petition. Additionally, there is information on vehicle charging stations and privately owned electric charging on both energy consumption and the impact of the electric grid on the stat e. We mention some details of this bill because energy will continue to be a focus of future legislation and we know how important it is to the City of Delray Beach regarding vehicle charging and fueling stations, as well as green energy initiatives. There was recently a workshop in Tallahassee that ECI attended specifically on electric vehicle charging and the electrical grid. We expect a rule -making workshop soon probably in Central Florida to deal with these issues, where we will be in attendance. Seap orts During the 2010 Legislative Session ECI and the coalition of Florida Seaports gained support for significant changes to port regulations. HB 963 by Representative Ray and SB 2000 by Senator Ring was Port Policy/Regulatory Relief legislation dealing specifi cally with the following: port conceptual permits, stormwater management systems serving overwater piers, reduction of match for rehabilitation of wharves and piers, flexibility language for FSTED program, funding process, dredging permits issued by DEP, p ublic/private partnership authority, as well as providing an expedited process for the submission of work program amendments for seaport projects. ECI attended all committee meetings, as well as numerous meetings with the sponsors, other legislator and sta ff to ensure its passage. In 2011, ECI helped pass HB 283 by Representative Young/SB 524 by Senator Latvala. Florida at that time was the only state subject to both state and federal seaport requirements, including duplicative background checks and access cards. This of course put the state and specifically Port Everglades at a competitive disadvantage with other ports, as well as being costly to port users and workers. HB 283 repealed these duplicative regulations and was signed into law by Governor Scott at a special bill signing - 14 - ceremony. (This legislation settled the differences of the FDLE card and the TWIC (Transportation Worker ID Card). Please note that this was an ongoing battle since 2009 and we are very proud of passage of this legislation. In 2 011 ECI was instrumental in working with the Ports Council to help pass language geared toward environmental processes, permitting language and seaport planning language. (Senator Ring and Representative Ray – HB 399) This legislation is beneficial to Por t Everglades because of the maintenance dredging and streamline permitting language. InA2012.AspecificAportAfundingAforAtheASouthPortATurningANotchAwasAeliminatedAfromAFDOT’sAfiveAyearA work plan. ECI strategically led a coalition of business leaders fro m Broward County that included Port Everglades Board Members, members of the Greater Fort Lauderdale Business Alliance and Broward County Commissioners. We then facilitated critical meetings with key legislators and agency decision makers to reinstate tha t funding in the appropriations process. ECI was instrumental in working along side the Ports Council to help pass monumental seaport legislation. Increased financial assistance, as well as streamline permitting legislation was put into place to benefit F lorida’sA14Aseaports,AWeAworkedAhardAtoAsecureAadditionalAmoneyAforAtheAFSTEDAProgram.AasA wellAasAsettingAupAaAStrategicAPortAInitiativeAtoAbenefitAtheAfutureAofAFlorida’sAports,AOurAeffortsAresultedAinA an increase from the previous year and specific appro priations for Port Everglades are as follows: Port Everglades $1,100,000 for the Southport Turning Notch (project funded through FSTED Port Everglades $12,000,000 for Southport ICTF on Port Rail Improvement (project funded through FDOT) Port Everglades $12,214,668 for Southport Turning Notch Expansion (project funded through FDOT) FEC/ Port Everglades ICTF $30,000,000 (project funded in the Intermodal line item) Crime Lab CrimeAlabAfundingAhasAbeenAaApriorityAforAtheABrowardACountyASheriff’sAOfficeAa nd Broward County for the last few years. Florida has five crime labs that are underfunded by the state. Prior to the 2012 legislative session, statutory authority allowed but did not require judges to impose an additional penalty to increase the funding for crime labs when they were used in the successful prosecution of a defendant. Invoking this additional fine was rarely imposed and it was not uniformly applied. This created significant shortfalls that the Sheriff ’s office and the County then had to s ubsidize with local funding. Efforts led by ECI throughout 2010 and 2011 culminated in successful changes to mandate crime lab fees in 2012 legislation. Specifically, language was passed that would require a $100 fee to be mandated when a person was co nvicted of a crime and the local crime lab was utilized. There are 5 local crime labs that are located in Broward, Palm Beach, Miami -Dade, Indian River and Pinellas Counties. ThroughAECI’sAstrongArelationshipsAwithAtheABrowardAdelegation.AsupportAforAt he language to change the statute was garnered early in the process. This support resulted in Senator Bogdanoff (who was essential in previous efforts) committing to making it a priority during Budget negotiations. ECI worked - 15 - tirelessly throughout the ap propriations process attending all Budget meetings and worked along side Senator Bogdanoff to gain support of both the House and Senate leadership to secure the House acceptance of the mandatory $100 fee language. We were successful in getting the House t o accept the language and Senate Conforming Bill 1968 passed both the House and Senate unanimously. Our understanding is that this language will provide an estimated $5 Million funding for the crime labs. During the veto period we worked diligently with t heAGovernor’sAOfficeAtoAanswerAquestionsAandA educate them on the user fee funding source contained in the legislation. Our arguments were persuasive and the bill was ultimately approved by the Governor. Afterschool Programs During the 2012 Legislative Session Claudia Davant helped lead the charge to prevent the passage of legislative changes that would have made 32,000 low -income children ineligible for participation in the afterschool programs they were currently enrolled in . She met with legislators and facilitated language supported by the Florida AfterSchool Network and other advocates for children and education so that theAlegislationAthatAwasAultimatelyApassedAmetAtheirAgoalsAforAimprovingAchildren’sAschoolAreadinessA wit houtAblockingAaccessAtoAimportantAafterschoolAprograms,AClaudiaAwasAnamedAFlorida’sA“ fterschoolA ChampionAofAtheAYear”AforAherAsuccessfulAproAbonoAworkAonAbehalfAofAtheAFloridaA fterschoolANetwork, Budget Robert Beck, a founding partner with Adams St. Ad vocatesAleadsAourAFirm’sA ppropriationsAwork,AARobertA hasAaAsolidAunderstandingAofAtheAStateAofAFlorida’sAbudgetAprocessAhavingAheldAnumerousAseniorA appointmentsAinAtheAExecutiveAbranch.AtheAGovernor’sAOfficeAandAinAtheASenateALegislativeA Appropriations Co mmittee. Since leaving government in 2008 after 22 years, Robert has helped secure millions of dollars in appropriations increases as well as preserves base budget funding on behalf of his clients. These accomplishments include: • FY 2010 -2011 – Preserv ed funding for home and community -based programs serving seniors in while over $4 Billion was cut from programs in the State Budget. During the worse fiscal times the State of Florida has ever faced, Mr. Beck was able to secure several million dollars to increaseAFlorida’sA gingA & Disabled Medicaid Waiver program. • FY 2011 -2012 - $40 million increase for home and community based care programs for seniors includingAforA lzheimer’sAProjectsA&AServices:ANursingAhomeAdiversionAprogram.ACommunityACareAforAth e Elderly, and local service programs serving Broward and Miami -Dade Counties. • FY 2012 -2013 $ 23 million increase for home and community based care programs for seniors $ 11.4 million for the AIDS Insurance Continuation Programs which serves Broward C ounty $ 2.5 million increase for AIDS Drug Assistance Program $ 4.4 million for Juvenile delinquency prevention programs $ 1.0 million of the Health Council of South Florida InAadditionAtoAtheseArecentAappropriationsAsecuredAthroughAMr,ABeck’sAadvocacyAef forts, he also was an integralAmemberAofAtheA2012ATeamAledAbyAEricksAConsultantsAtoAprotectAtheASFRT ’sAbaseAbudgetAfundingA for commuter rail transportation and secured $2 million for rail bridge replacement in Central Florida. Finally, Mr. Beck has helpe d his clients achieve success in the budgeting process in numerous cases - 16 - through the development of State Budget Proviso language and development of numerous budget conforming bills critical to ensuring proper implementation of the budget following legisla tive session. Charter Schools ECI was instrumental in obtaining increases in appropriations each year for charter schools. We represent the City of Coral Springs and the City of Pembroke Pines on charter school issues. This has been an uphill battle over the years to gain support and appropriations for the charter school effort. 2001 - Increased from $20 million to $27.7 million 2006 - Increased from $27.7 million to $53 million During the 2007 and 2008 Legislative Sessions - over $54,000,000 2010 - $56,112,466 2011 - $55 million appropriated with additional money for high performing charter school systems (note that both Coral Springs and Pembroke Pines are part of a high performing charter schools system) 2012 - $55,209,106 (plus additional funding available after allocation to the lab schools) Broward Center for the Performing Arts In 2012, ECI was successful in helping pass a bill for the Broward Center of the Performing Arts. The bill grants a public record exemption for publicly owned and operated performing arts centers. Before the billApassedAconfidential.Asensitive.AandApersonalAinformationAofAtheAcenters’AdonorsAwereAsubjectAtoA public records requests. The bill was signed by the Governor and donors are now protected. Crimes Against T he Homeless This effort was attempted for many years, prior to passage in 2010. HB 11 by Representative Porth and SB 506 by Senator Ring, added homelessness into the statute of Hate Crimes (reclassifying offenses evidencing prejudice based on the homeles s status of the victim). Florida leads the nation in attacks on the homeless. After Maryland enacted a law based on some of the horrific incidences that we as a community faced here in Broward, Sheriff Lamberti contacted members of our Delegation to pursu e this effort yet one more time. ECI worked with the sponsors, Commander Rick Wierzbicki and Broward staff through every committee meeting and numerous discussions with Legislators in both the Senate and the House to ensure passage of this legislation. A lthough it did not pass unanimously [25 yeas/10 nays], there was virtually no discussion on the floor when Senator Ring presented the bill to the Senate. However, some members of the House were quite vocal in their opposition to adding another Hate Crime t o the statute that already included nine classes. Representative Porth gave a passionate argument and defense of the legislation. Ultimately, the vote was not close [80 yeas/28 nays] and HB 11 passed. Medical Examiner During the 2011 Legislative Sessio n ECI facilitated a meeting with Steven Fielder, Director of Government Relations for the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, regarding allowing our medical examiners to be given direct access to the DAVID database [Driver & Vehicle Informatio n Database[,AThisAdatabaseAcontainsAaAmotorist’sAidentifyingAandAemergencyAcontactAinformation.AforAtheA purpose of determining the identification of a deceased individual. Fielder was concerned about the numberAofAexaminers’AabilityAtoAgainAaccess,AThrough a lengthy discussion we agreed upon a number of roughly 20 (as the number across the state) that, pursuant to an interagency agreement, would have - 17 - secure access to the database. Once DHSMV signed off on the agreed upon language we went back to Representat ive Moraitis who we had briefed prior to our meeting with DHSMV. With the groundwork already set we started the 2012 Session touching base with Steven Fielder to make sure the Department was still supportive of our efforts. He gave us the green light and we immediately met with Representative Albritton and his staff to explain why our Medical Examiners should have direct access to the DAVID database. He understood, but also made it clear that only language that was agreed on by both sponsors (House and S enate) would make it into the final cut of the legislative package. We had our marching orders and went directly to Senator Latvala's office and met with his staff to explain at length the need we saw for direct access to the database and why we should be included in the legislation. From that point we were on constant follow -up with both offices up until the strike -all legislation was made public. We were very pleased that the database language was incorporated. Palm Beach County In 2011 ECI was ins trumental in securing language in the reorganizational legislation for enterprise zone boundary designations on behalf of Palm Beach County. Also, we were able to secure $1.4 million in the budget during the Conference process for the Glades Senior Center/West County Homeless Resource Center. Although the $1.4 M passed in the budget, this particular item, along with many other items, wasAsubjectAtoAGovernorAScott’sAvetoApower, Property Appraiser Issues ECI worked with Senator Ring and Representative Holde r to pass SB 1580 - partial property payments. This piece of legislation proved to be more difficult than we expected. There were many hurdles; however, with the help and dedication of Senator Ring, Representative Holder, Representative Bogdanoff and Repre sentative Murzin, among others, we were able to get it through both chambers in the last few days of Session. What SB 1580 ultimately does is allows for taxpayers to pay their property taxes in partial payments. Before passage of this legislation the law d id not legally allow the tax collector to collect the payment unless it was paid in full. This piece of legislation will be helpful to the Florida citizens in these difficult economic times. Seminole Compact After years of negotiation, the Seminole Trib e of Florida and the State finally came together on a compact. The agreement comes after the Legislature challenged the first compact in 2008 and rejected compacts in 2009. The compact will allow the state to collect at least a billion dollars over five ye ars. The Seminole Tribe is authorized to conduct gaming at the following locations: Seminole Indian Casino – Brighton, located in Okeechobee, FL, Seminole Indian Casino – Coconut Creek, located in Coconut Creek, FL, Seminole Indian Casino – Hollywood, located in Hollywood, FL, Seminole Indian Casino – Immokalee, located in Immokalee, FL, Seminole Indian Casino – Big Cypress, located in Clewiston, FL, Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino – Hollywood, located in Hollywood, FL, and Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino – Tampa, located in Tampa, FL . - 18 - As a part of the Revenue Sharing Agreement between the state and local governments, the State will remit 3% of revenue received from the Tribe. Out of this 3%, Broward County shall receive 22.5% for revenue collected from the Seminole Indian Casino -Coconut Creek facility, and 25% for both Seminole Indian Casino in Hollywood and the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Hollywood. (The share is less for Coconut Creek due to more cities being included in the share tha n for the Hollywood facilities.) ECIAwasAsuccessfulAinAnegotiatingAaA5%AfeeAtoAaffectedAcitiesAandAcountiesAinAtheAoriginalAGovernor’sA compact that was overturned by the courts. ECI then helped negotiate the eventually agreed upon 3% (down from 5% becaus e the legislative compact was requiring a larger guarantee from the Seminoles in the final agreement) on the legislative compact. ECI was instrumental in ensuring the percentage cuts to Broward County and the City of Coconut Creek. Law Enforcement ECI w as responsible for numerous pieces of legislation dealing with all areas of public safety. SB 214 which set the statewide standards for the training and use of dart firing stun guns. SB 428 which raised the per diem rates for travel expenses of public emp loyees. HB 251 which created the Marvin Clayton Act, which is the database to fairly and correctly dispense the allocation for local law 175/185 premium tax revenues. HB 295 which increased the penalties for violators that attempted to flee or elude law en forcementAofficers,AHBA749AtheADuvalACountyASheriff’sAofficeApensionAplanAlegislationAaddedA correctional officers to special risk of their local law plan. SB 1792 which revised the number of members sitting on the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Co mmission and added the 180 day tolling or limitation period of actions against a law enforcement officer. HB 123 law enforcement officers’AbillAofArights.AthatAstoppedAtheA180AdayAtollingAofAanAinvestigationAduringAaAdeclaredAstateAofA emergency and clarifi ed that law enforcement officers were entitled to be interviewed last during an investigation. HB 143 set state wide training standards for firearms training, bringing Florida in line with Federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act. Local Governments In 2008, ECI was able to obtain $500,000 for the Fire Training Simulator Tower for the City of Coral Springs. In 2008, Claudia Davant was retained to help the City of Tavares secure funding from the FDOT for the development of commuter rail in Tavares. In a dditionAtoArailAfunding.ADavant’sAteamAhelpedAtheACityAwithA various permitting issues related to the redevelopment of downtown Tavares. The Department of Environmental Protection had been unwilling to grant the City approval for the reconstruction of an ov erwater pavilion on Lake Dora. The Davant Team worked with state and local officials, as well as the LegislatureAandAGovernor’sAoffice.AtoAgetAapprovalAforAtheAproject,ATheACityAwasAnotAonlyAgrantedAallA permits for construction, but the permits were expedi ted, saving the City over 12 months of project delays. ECI was responsible for obtaining $7 M for the Plantation Preserve Golf Course. CBIRS - Back when community budget requests were part of the budget, ECI was extremely knowledgeable and successful i n securing them for our local governments. Florida Atlantic University - 19 - EC I worked with Tom Barlow, Director of Governmental Relations for Florida Atlantic University, to secure funds for identified FAU programs. ECI was initially hired to work on the FAU Davie Campus expansion. During the time ECI represented the University we exceeded our assigned goal and were instrumental in securing substantial funding for the university. In 2007, $94 million in PECO funding, $4.3 million recurring for their medical school expanding as 4 year program; $18 million for a new engineering project; $10 million for a general classroom building; $18 million for the Davie campus expansion; $8 million for the Harbor Branch Oceanic Research Center; and, an $500,000 increase for a student -teacher program. During the 2008 Legislative Session, ECI successfully secured the final $4.3 appropriation for the medical school as well as $8.75 million for an ocean to energy project, $52 million in PECO funding, $9 million in student proje cts, and $5 million for the Wellness Center. Local Preemption Experience Local preemption language is a constant battle in Tallahassee in numerous areas and we fight all session long for our local governments. Some examples of our experiences in this are a include: Growth Management InA2009AECIAworkedAwithARepresentativeASchenk’sAofficeAtoAplaceAaAconformingAamendmentAonAHBA73A regarding contracting with the Department of Environmental Protection. The language extends the ability to expedite permitting to charter counties with population over 1.2 million that have delegation agreements with DEP or WMD if they do so by resolution. (This bill was amended and passed.) Solid Waste In 2010, ECI worked closely with local governments and other interested partie s to defeat preemptive language that would have ultimately dissolved solid waste franchise agreements between a city or county and a vendor. That language would have changed the definition of Construction and Demolition debris and would have put an end to previously negotiated and operating contracts. The last time there was a real attempt to change this language was about five years ago. We were also instrumental in defeating that initiative at that time. Recycling SB 570 by Senator Constantine was qu ite contentious during the entire 2010 Session. ECI worked with all interested parties to ensure that unachievable mandates to local governments and private business were not in the final piece of legislation. From the beginning we felt comfortable with ho lding unfriendly language at bay in the House, knowing that we had a fight on our hands in the Senate. The House introduced their language as part of a committee sponsored bill [HB 7243] under Representative Williams’Adirection,A sAtheAnextAfewAweeksAunfol ded, through countless discussions, amendments and negotiations, we were successful in ensuring that acceptable language was included in the legislation. Taxi Cabs ECI has fought against and has always been successful in defeating pre -emptive language re garding taxi cab regulation for many years. The proposed language prohibits state and local governments from regulating the transfers of taxi cab licenses or shares in the corporation that owns those licenses. The - 20 - language usually shows up within the las t few weeks of Session. In 2009 it was filed as an amendment to SB 424 and onto HB 1021. In 2010 the language showed up during the last 2 weeks filed as an amendment onto HB 1271. The 2011 Session was a bit different. The legislation was drawn only to affect Hillsborough County. We met with the sponsor to ensure it would not affect Broward. Last year there was not an appetite to entertain the efforts although there was discussion. Traffic Enforcement Cameras ECI worked on and helped pass House Bil l 325 that formalizes and governs the specifications for the red light cameras across the state. The bill allows local governments to contract with private contractors to install red light cameras at intersections. The bill provides that any red light in fraction will result in a fine of $158. If the county or municipality operates the camera, then the local government will retain $75. If the state operates the cameras, then the local government will receive $45. Under both scenarios, $10 will go to the Department of Health Administrative Trust Fund and $3 will go into the Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Trust Fund. During the 2012 Legislative Session there was legislation introduced and an attempt to repeal the red light camera law. HB 4087 by Representa tive Corcoran passed the House but was never taken up in the Senate. Since the Senate did not consider the repeal, the sponsor offered amendments to other transportation bills. One particular amendment seemed to gather support toward the end of the Sessio n and may be back next year. The amendment would have required traffic studies to show that red light cameras would in fact make intersections safer. Other amendments that were debated included the prohibition on citations for red light right hand turns and enactment of specific yellow timing standards. ECI worked alongside interested parties against this effort for our cities, Palm Beach County and ACS. We do expect to see this issue in the 2013 Legislative Session. Ericks Consultants, Inc., together with Adams St. Advocates, would be pleased to accept this one year contract for lobbying services for the City of Delray Beach for an annual fee of $40,000, payable in twelve monthly installments. This contract includes but is not limited t o scheduled, extended and special legislative sessions as well as other times throughout the year deemed necessary by the City or the Consultant. The ECI/ASA team would like the opportunity to partner with the City of Delray Beach. We want to thank the City for the opportunity to present this unique and exciting strategic alliance that will allow the City to enter the 2013 Legislative Session with confidence and trust. Should you have any questions or need additional information on any part of this proposal, please do not hesitate to ask. Thank you. - 21 - – The following Client List offers insight into the varied nature of our experience and current endeavors and provides contact information for each of our clients. A merican Ambulance Service, Inc. Charles Maymon 2570 South Park Road Pembroke Park, FL 33009 954 -868 -6668 cmaymon@AmericanAmbulanceSvc.com ECI began representing American Ambulance before local governments in 2010. American Marketing & Management, Inc. Austin Forman 888 SE 3rd Avenue, Suite 501 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 954 -522 -1969 af01@bellsouth.ne t ECI has represented American Marketing for more than 12 years. BAGS, Inc. Craig Mateer 6751 Forum Drive, Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32821 407 -447 -5547 craig@airportbags.com ECI resumed representing BAGS, Inc. in Broward County in 2011. Broward Center for the Performing Arts Kelley Shanley 201 SW 5th Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312 -7112 954 -522 -5334 kshanley@browardcenter.org ECI has represented the Center for over 12 years. Broward County Eddie Labrador 115 South Andrews Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 954 -357 -7575 elabrador@broward.org - 22 - ECI has represented Broward County for more than 14 years. Broward County Property Appraiser Lori Parrish 115 South Andrews Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 954 -357 -6904 lori@bcpa.net ECI has represented the Broward County Property Appraiser for over five years. Broward County Sheriff’s Office Sheriff Al Lamberti 2601 West Broward Boulevard Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312 954 -321 -4605 allamberti1@aol.com ECIAhasArepresentedAtheABrowardASheriff’sAOfficeAforAoverAthreeAyears, Broward Health (formerly North Broward Hospital District) Charlotte Mather 303 SW 17th Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 954 -355 -4174 charlotte.mather@nbhd.org ECI has represented Broward Health for over seven years. Cash Bond Onl ine Pat McDonough 1750 Archmont Circle Dacula, GA 30019 888 -726 -6301 pmcdonough@cashbondonline.com ECI began representing Cash Bond Online in 2011. Center Stage Attractions Joe Gehl 1815 Cordova Road, Suite 211 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33315 954 -522 -4146 jgehl912@aol.com ECI has represented the Gehl Group for over 20 years. - 23 - City of Coconut Creek David Rivera 4800 West Copans Road Coconut Creek, FL 33063 954 -973 -6720 drivera@coconutcreek.net ECI has represented City of Coconut Creek for almost six years. City of Coral Springs Erdal Donmez 9551 West Sample Road Coral Springs, FL 33065 954 -344 -1142 edonmez@coralsprings.org ECI has represented City of Coral Springs for over eight years. City of Fort Lauderdale Lee Feldman 100 N. Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954 -828 -5364 lfeldman@fortlauderdale.gov ECI began representing the City of Fort Lauderdale in October 2012. City of North Lauderdale Ambreen Bhatty 701 SW 71st Avenue North Lauderdale, FL 33068 954 -724 -7041 abhatty@nlauderdale.org ECI resumed representing the City of North Lauderdale again in 2009. City of Pembroke Pines Mayor Frank Ortis Charlie Dodge 10100 Pines Boulevard Pembroke Pines, FL 33026 954 -431 -4884 cdodge@ppines.com ECI has represented the City of Pembroke Pines for at least six years. City of Plantation - 24 - Mayor Diane Veltri Bendekovic 400 NW 73rd Avenue Plantation, FL 33317 954 -797 -2227 mayor@plantation.org ECI has represented City of Plantation for over seven years. Diplomat Properties Limited Partners, LLC Francis X. Lilly 3555 South Ocean Drive Hollywood, FL 33019 202 -898 -2270 flilly@independentfiduciary.com ECI began representation of this world class resort and spa in 2011. Federation of Public Employees AFL -CIO Dan Reynolds 1700 NW 66th Avenue Suite 100 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33313 954 -797 -7575 x 221 taflaco@aol.com ECI has represented the FOPE since 2009. Florida Power and Light Company Paul Hamilton 215 South Monroe Street, Ste 810 Tallahassee, FL 32301 850 -521 -3915 paul_hamilton@fpl.com ECI has represented FP&L for over 13 years. Florida Sunshine Entertainment Association Angelina Spencer 4340 Beechwood Lake Drive Naples, FL 34112 216 -965 -7527 angelina001@comcast.net ECI has represented the Association since 2007. Fort Lauderdale Swap Shop Preston Henn 3501 West Sunrise Boulevard - 25 - Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33311 954 -931 -8148 swshop@aol.com ECI has represented the Swap Shop for over 20 years. The GEO Group, Inc. George Zoley Jorge Dominicis One Park Place, Suite 700 621 Northwest 53rd Street Boca Raton, FL 33487 561 -999 -7326 gzoley@geogroup.com jdominicis@geocareinc.com Gerstle, Rosen & Goldenberg, PA Ron Nadler 2630 NE 203rd Street Aventura, FL 33180 305 -937 -0116 rnadler@gerstlerosen.com ECI began representing the Gerstle CPA firm in Septembe r 2012. Herzog Contracting Norm Jester Post Office Box 1089 St. Joseph, MO 64502 954 -970 -3970 njester@herzogcompanies.com ECI has represented Herzog for over 14 years. JM Family Enterprises Sonya Deen 100 NW 12th Avenue Deerfield Beach, FL 33443 954 -429 -2404 sonya.deen@jmfamily.com ECI has represented JM for over 16 years. Kendall Properties & Investments Austin Forman Bill Murphy 4300 North University D rive, Suite D -103 Lauderhill, FL33351 - 26 - 954 -522 -1969 af01@bellsouth.net ECI has represented Kendall Properties for over seven years. Palm Beach County Todd Bonlarron 301 North Olive Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 3340 1 561 -310 -7832 tbonlarr@co.palm -beach.fl.us ECI has represented Palm Beach County for over eight years. Seminole County Sheriff’s Office Sheriff Donald F. Eslinger Chief Peggy Fleming 100 Bush Blvd. Sanford, FL 32773 407 -665 -6650 pfleming@seminolesheriff.org ECIAbeganArepresentingAtheASeminoleACountyASheriff’sAOfficeAonAOctoberA1.A2012, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority Joe Giulietti 800 NW 33rd Street, Suite 100 Pompano Beach, FL33064 954 -788 -7918 giuliettij@sfrta.gov ECI has represented SFRTA for over 17 years. Tindall Hammock Irrigation and Soil Conservation District Austin Forman 888 SE 3rd Avenue, Suite 501 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 954 -522 -1969 af01@bellsouth.net ECI has represented Tindall Hammock for over seven years. Town of Davie Richard J. Lemack 6591 Orange Drive Davie, FL 33314 954 -797 -1023 richard_lemack@davie -fl.gov - 27 - ECI resumed representing the Town of Davie in 2010. United Healthcare of Florida Tom Moore 3100 SW 14th Avenue Miramar, FL 33027 813 -890 -4531 thomas_w_moore@uhc.com ECI began representation of UHC in 2010. United Pawnbrokers Group Thomas E. Sams 4527 Arnold Avenue Naples, FL 34104 239 -825 -0714 tomsams@c apitalpawn.com ECI has worked with the United Pawnbrokers Group or members of the pawnbroker community since 2003. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. Russell Mackie 2101 W SR 84 Longwood, FL 32779 305 -651 -7011 rmackie@wasteprousa.com ECI began representing Waste Pro in 2011. - 28 - – Ericks Consultants is pleased to present the following professional references: Company Name: American Marketing & Management Address: 888 SE 3rd Avenue, Suite 501, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 Contact Name: Austin Forman Telephone: 954 -763 -8111 E -Mail Address: af01@ammi.net Fax: 954 -522 -1969 ECI has represented this client since 2000 Company Nam e: South Florida Regional Transportation Authority Address: 800 NW 33rd Street, Suite 100, Pompano Beach, FL 33064 Contact Name: Vicki Wooldridge or Joe Giulietti Telephone: 954 -788 -7934 E -Mail Address: wooldridgev@sfrta.fl.gov Fax: 954 -786 -7505 ECI has represented this client since 1995 Company Name: Broward Health Address: 303 SW 17th Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 Contact Name: Charlotte Mather Telephone: 954 -355 -4174 E -Mail Address: charlotte.mather@nbhd.org Fax: 954 -355 -4774 ECI has represented this client since 2005 CompanyAName;ABrowardACountyASheriff’sAOffice Address: 2601 West Broward Blvd, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312 Contact Name:Al Lamberti or Danielle DiNicola Telephone: 954 -321 -4605 E -Mail Address: danielle_dinicola@sheriff.org Fax: 954 -763 -4917 ECI has represented this client since 2009 Company Name: JM Family Enterprises Address: 100 NW 12th Avenue, Deerfield Beach, FL 33443 Contact Name: Sonya Deen Telephone: 954 -429 -2404 E -Mail Address: sonya.deen@jmfamily.com Fax: 954 -429 -2677 ECI has represen ted this client since 1996 Company Name: Broward County Property Appraiser Address: 115 South Andrews Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Contact Name: Lori Parrish Telephone: 954 -357 -6904 E -Mail Address: lori@ bcpa.net Fax: 954 -357 -8474 ECI has represented this client since 2006 Company Name: City of Plantation Address: 400 NW 73rd Avenue, Plantation, FL 33317 Contact Name: Mayor Diane Veltri Bendekovic Telephone: 954 -797 -2222 E -Mail Address: mayor@plantation.org Fax: 954 -797 -2223 ECI has represented this client since 2005 - 29 - Company Name: City of Coral Springs Address: 9551 West Sample Road, Coral Springs, FL 33065 Contact Name: Erdal Donmez Telephone: 954 -344 -5906 E -Mail Address: edonmez@coralsprings.org Fax: 954 -344 -1043 ECI has represented this client since 2000 Adams St. Advocates LLC is a Florida Limited Liability Company established in 2011. Our office hours are Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 5:00 PM; however, we are always available to our clients via cell phone, text message or email. ASA has two Tallahassee offices and also works from the ECI office in Fort Lauderdale. W e encourage you to visit our website at: www.adamsstadvocates.com for more information on our firm. Professional Reference for Claudia Davant : Company Name: Xerox State & Local Solutions, Inc. Address: 2 073 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 300, Tallahassee, FL 32317 Contact Name: Chuck Cliburn Telephone: 850 -210 -1302 E -Mail Address: chuck.cliburn@acs -inc.com When was your contract awarded: 2008 Profession al Reference for Robert Beck : Company Name: Aging & Disability Resource Center of Broward County Address: 5300 N. Hiatus Road, Sunrise, FL 33351 -8701 Contact Name: Edith Lederberg Telephone: 954 -745 -9603 E -Mail Address: lederbee@adrchbroward.org Fax: 954 -745 -9584 When was your contract awarded: 2008 Cit y of Delray Beach - Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Florida Strategic Group Contact Information: David A. Shepp 1 . Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach 2 David Shepp – Consultant Alex Cutts – Administrative Assistant 2 . List types of additional costs above the annual fee , if any (i.e. travel, printing , etc.) None 3 . Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: X = Yes a. Lobby State Legislature X b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies X c. Lobby local and other agencies (i.e. Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). X – as necessary d . Meet regularly with City elected official s and/or staff (i.e., in - person, conference call, etc.) X e . Develop City’s state legislative agenda X f . Provide weekly legislative updates during session X g . Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Executive Branch and State Agencies X 4 . Does your firm provide federal lobbying services? If so, please describe. Yes. We currently provide federal consulting for the City of Lakeland and can develop a similar program for the City of Delray Beach. a. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, please describe the type of assistance that may be available. n/a b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partner s with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. 5 . Provide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session , and provide a summary of the final result. 1. HB 615, by Rep. Horner – create a ‘blacklist ’ for retailers who refuse to pay wholesale distributors as well as classifying roll -your -own (RYO) tobacco stores as ‘manufacturers ’. T h e bill stalled at the end of Session, but we were able to am end the retailer/distributor issue on to HB 887 by Rep. Ingram. The bill was signed by Governor Scott and went into law on Oct 1, 2012. The RYO provision was removed, but later passed by Congress and signed by the President. 2. HB 4025, by Rep. O ’Toole – elimination of local business taxes. Fought the proposal to repeal F.S. Chapter 205, the “Local Business Tax ” statute, which would have eliminated local business licenses and the resulting revenues. Worked with members of the House Finance & Tax Committee to prepare questions during the Committee Workshop to discredi t the bill and keep it from reaching a vote. The bill was TP ’d and did not advance beyond the Committee. City of Delray Beach - Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Greenberg Traurig Contact Information: Leslie Dughi, Assistant Director of Government Affairs, 850 -521 -8571; cell 850 -519 -3903 1. Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach Hayden Dempsey , Chair, Florida Governmental Affairs Practice Leslie Dughi, Assistant Director of Government Affairs Note: There are five lobbying professionals on our team. While these two professional s will be primary for Delray Beach, to ensure the highest level of representation is provided, the other team members stand ready to assist. GT also has 2 full -time legislative services professionals that provide support for all legislative needs. 2. List types of additional costs above the annual fee, if any (i.e. travel, printing, etc.) Expenses in addition to the annual fee would include travel (primarily for face to face meetings with Delray Beach staff and Commissioners which may also be done through conference calls). We expect to keep these additional costs to a minimum. Further, we typically include in our proposals that any expenses over a certain amount be subject to the client’s written approval. 3. Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: a. Lobby State Legislature Yes b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes c. Lobby local and other agencies (i.e. Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). Our proposed contract would focus on lobbying on the state level for Delray Beach. However, our team and other members of Greenberg Traurig have strong working relationships with local agencies. In particular, our South Flo rida professionals have experience working with Palm Beach County policymakers and the South Florida Water Management District. Further, in Florida and in DC, we have professionals with extensive expertise working with the US Army Corps and the Corps of E ngineers. d. Meet regularly with City elected officials and/or staff (i.e., in - person, conference call, etc.) Yes – Regular meetings will ensure we provide the highest level of representation for the City. We are willing to meet with staff and Commiss ioners in the manner (in person or by conference call) that best suits Delray Beach. e. Develop City’s state legislative agenda Yes – It is imperative that the lobbying team gains an in -depth understanding of the issues important to Delray Beach. Develop ment of a legislative agenda should be a collaborative effort between Delray Beach leaders and the lobby team. f. Provide weekly legislative updates during session Yes. During session, legislative language can change quickly. It is important that close contact is maintained with the Commissioners and staff to ensure we are appropriately advocating your position. g. Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes 4. Does your firm provide federal lobbying servic es? If so, please describe. Yes. Our DC Governmental Affairs team has successfully provided legislative representation and lobbying at the federal level for a number of municipal clients. Our team has achieved fiscal and policy successes on behalf of ou r municipal clients, securing more than $250 million in funding over the past decade. These funds have been instrumental in a variety of economic development, housing, infrastructure, environmental, homeland security, and community -related programs. a. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, please describe the type of assistance that may be available. N/A b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partners with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. N/A 5. Provide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session, and provide a summary of the final result. Our team, for more than 20 years, has been involved in major legislative initiatives on varied policy and appropriation issues. We are happy to provide you with an extensive list of issues we have worked on over the last several years. Outlined below are a few of the issues we worked on for our clients. Local Business Taxes – On behalf of a municipality, we worked to change language originally proposed by Rep. O’Toole which would have prohib ited any increases in local business tax rates beginning in FY 2012 - 13. Working closely with Rep. Roberson, the language that ultimately passed exempted individuals licensed and operating as a real estate sales or broker associate from paying a local busi ness tax. The bill also provided an option for certain counties and municipalities to continue levying local business taxes, provided that at least 25% of their local tax revenue in local FY 2012 -13 comes from local business taxes. Counties and municipalit ies opting to continue levying local business tax would not have been able to increase their ad valorem millage rates above those levied in local FY 2012 -13, unless they discontinue levying their local business tax. Further, the bill provided that certain counties and municipalities that pledged their local business tax revenue stream as security for bonds or certificates issued before March 9, 2012, could have continued to levy their tax to meet obligations required by the bonds or certificates. Septic T anks - On behalf of a local municipality, we worked with Rep. Dorworth and others on HB 999 (which ultimately was added to HB 1263 by Rep. Hudson). This bill repealed the statewide onsite septic system evaluation program and required a county or municipal ity with a first magnitude spring to develop and adopt by local ordinance a septic system evaluation and assessment program, unless the county or municipality opts out. All other counties and municipalities may opt in. Further, existing septic system inspe ction programs are grandfathered in unless they contain a mandatory inspection at the point of sale in a real estate transaction . The bill also ensured that owners are given at least 60 days’ notice that their system is due for an evaluation. Finally, the bill required DEP to notify a municipality of potential funding under the Clean Water Act or Clean Water State Revolving Fund and assist such counties or municipalities to model and establish low -interest loan programs. Failure to Return Vehicles - On be half of an international rental vehicle company, we successfully drafted and passed proactive legislation (HB 729 by Rep. Pilon) that ensured stolen vehicles would be added to the law enforcement "hot sheet" to ensure quick retrieval of the vehicle. The b ill also increased, for an evidentiary standpoint, the weight given to the evidence that the person in possession of the vehicle received the demand for return notice from the company and failed to return the vehicle. Medicaid Reform - Over the last thre e legislative sessions, on behalf of a national health care organization and a statewide business association, we played a significant role in the 2011 comprehensive rewrite of the state's Medicaid program. We worked very closely with legislative leadersh ip and the Governor's office to craft and implement this landmark legislation. Our work continued in the 2012 session as implementation of the reform began and as changes were proposed. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com ©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved . GT Overview of Greenberg Traurig’s Proposal for State Lobbying Services Presented to City of Delray Beach, Florida October 12, 2012 Contact: Leslie Y. Dughi Assistant Director, Governmental Affairs Greenberg Traurig, P.A. dughil@gtlaw.com Direct: 850.521.8571 101 East College Avenue Tallahassee, FL 32301 GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. | ATTORNEYS AT LAW | WW W.GTLAW.COM Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 1 GT Table of Contents Section Page About Greenberg Traurig’s Tallahassee Office 2 Qualifications and Experience 3 Representative State Experience 4 Greenberg Traurig’s Team for Delray Beach 7 Legislative Support Services 9 Proposed Fee Schedule and Expenses 10 Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 2 GT About Greenberg Traurig’s Tallahassee Office Greenberg Traurig’s Tallahassee office is home to a multidisciplinary legal team with deep Florida roots. For more than 20 years, our lawyers and governmental affairs professionals have worked at the intersection of business, government and the law. We provide our clients with a wide range of practical legal counsel and services, from dispute resolution and transactional representation to governmental advocacy and day-to-day corporate advice. Located just one block from the state’s capitol and legislative buil dings, and three blocks from Florida’s Supreme Court, GT’s Tallahassee office gives our clients an immediate physical and political link to the heart of the nation’s fourth largest state. Greenberg Traurig merged with the Tallahassee offic e of Roberts, Baggett, LaFace & Richard in 1992 with approximately 14 lawyers who maintained a successful practice for over 15 years. The union provided GT with not only the strong state go vernmental presence that RBL&R had but the ability to expand this presence statewide. The f ruit of these years has been not only strong relationships with governmental and elected officia ls, but also deeply-rooted relationships with the staff of these officials — whose longevity, man y times, exceeds the terms of their bosses. We have clients across the entire political spectrum. Our practice includes banking, local government, procurement, campaigns and elections, d ata security and privacy, economic incentives, energy, environmental, financial servic es, gaming, growth management, health care, housing, insurance, public relations and medi a strategy, state appropriations, taxation, telecommunications, and transportation. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 3 GT Qualifications and Experience The Florida Governmental Affairs team at Greenberg Traurig has been in the mix of every major legislative battle for the past 18 years. We’ve wor ked to develop and pass such notable legislation as the creation of the Dade County Expr essway Authority, Florida's Catastrophic Hurricane Fund, Workers’ Compensation Reform, Nursi ng Home ‘Tort Reform’ Legislation, the 1995 Telecommunications Act, Privacy and HIPPA Impl ementation Legislation, Gramm-Leach- Bliley Act (GLB Act) Implementation Legislation, th e first state definition of ‘Green Energy,’ Rate Rebalancing Legislation, and Florida’s Unified Buil ding Code. We have annually navigated the appropriations process to obtain funding for munici palities and numerous other clients. We’ve helped maintain markets for Florida’s independent p ower producers and developed new markets for Florida’s life, health, and auto insure rs. Each legislative session, the GT Tallahassee Govern mental Affairs Team advocates for clients seeking state funding for a variety of programs and projects. Annually our team defends current substantive policy and seeks to amend it on behalf of our clients. Moreover, we are involved in the development of yearly appropriation requests, i ncluding the drafting of substantive legislation with both statewide and local fiscal im pact. We determine the appropriate sponsors, research and develop oral and written materials to support the issue, and intricately follow each movement through the House and Senate. On appropriat ion projects, as negotiations progress through the end of the session, we rely on our stro ng relationships with House and Senate leadership, appropriations leadership and staff to ensure that our clients’ requests survive the maze of House and Senate offers resulting in passag e of the final Appropriations Act. The Florida Governmental Affairs practice extends f ar beyond legislative representation. We are experienced in appearing before the Cabinet and all executive agencies on behalf of a wide range of clients. Our knowledge and expertise in al l facets of Florida administrative law have given us the reputation as one of the “go to” firms for resolving matters with state government in Tallahassee. Our administrative law litigators are recognized throughout the state as highly skilled and successful in their efforts, and combin ed with our executive agency lobby team, form an unbeatable combination of access and substance t hat is rarely found in one firm. Our governmental affairs team is supported by a full -time staff of support personnel dedicated to making sure the team and our clients are kept ab reast of any and all relevant state government activities. This includes ongoing monito ring of executive and legislative branches, legislative tracking services, monitoring of commit tee and floor debate, defensive review of filed legislation and amendments, access to live calendar s, monitoring of the press, reviewing the Florida Administrative Code announcements, reviewin g proposed rules, preparing reports for clients, and research and drafting services. These services are provided year-round to our clients by one of the largest, most experienced, legislativ e support staffs of any firm in Florida. Greenberg Traurig’s lawyers and lobbyists have deca des of experience with the Florida Governor’s Office, the State Legislature, and with a ll the Florida state agencies, as well as the long-term relationships necessary for success. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 4 GT Representative State Experience Following is a representative list and description of work performed on behalf of a number of clients which includes both public and private enti ties. We would be happy to provide additional details upon request. City of North Port, Florida Scope of Services: Federal & State Legislative Repr esentation Length of Contract: 7 Years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Jonathon Lewis, City Manager Contact Phone: 941-429-7165 The state and federal GT Governmental Affairs Team has been the lead lobbyist for the City of North Port since 2005. During these years of repres entation, we have piloted the city through yearly offensive and defensive legislative efforts of concern to the municipality as well as successfully procured over $1.65 million in state a ppropriations for major municipal projects. On behalf of North Port, GT has also successfully: Defeated state legislation which would have prevent ed a freestanding emergency room from being opened within the City of North Port’s c ity limits. Included language in the State General Appropriatio ns Act requiring the Department of Community Affairs to provide technical assistance t o North Port to address antiquated lots and assist in growth planning. Defeated state legislation which would have signifi cantly restricted the city’s ability to conduct public works projects within the city. Florida Association of Court Clerks Scope of Services: State Legislative Representation Length of Contract: 36 years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Ken Kent, Executive Director Contact Phone: 850-921-0808 Our longstanding general counsel representation of t he Florida Association of Court Clerks (FACC) has placed us at the forefront of debate on local government issues involving court and county revenues, child support depository, public r ecords, and judicial management. Our representation of the Association included a mul ti-year effort that has resulted in the authorization and funding of a statewide Comprehens ive Case Management System, which is operational in each clerk of court’s office to prov ide a single portal for access to all court case Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 5 GT data maintained by the clerks. We have also been i nstrumental in the Associations’ development and operation of a statewide portal to provide access to the Official Records which contain the deeds, mortgages and other docume nts that are required by statute to be recorded in the county. AT&T Scope of Services: State Legislative Representation Length of Contract: 4 years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Joe York, Vice President, Legislative Affairs Contact Phone: 850-577-5500 In 2009, Greenberg Traurig represented this nationa l telecommunications company in passing the Consumer Choice and Protection Act, legislation aimed at increasing competition in the growing telecommunications market. In the previous session, our team’s efforts prevented a cell phone warranty company from obtaining a statewide m onopoly in providing warranties for cell phones and service. In the 2007 Legislative Sessio n, the GT Legislative Team overcame a slue of negative television ads by the Florida Cable Teleco mmunications Association and other national cable providers and obtained the passage of major l egislation on behalf of AT&T. The legislation broke up longstanding government sponsored monopoli es in the cable television industry. Enterprise Holdings Scope of Services: State Legislative Representation Length of Contract: 8 years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Jay Ryan, Vice President of Finance Contact Phone: 954-354-5104 Enterprise Holdings is the privately-held entity wh ich operates Enterprise, Alamo and National Rental Car as well as a large fleet management subs idiary. The GT Legislative Team defeated legislation which would have imposed vicarious liab ility on rental car companies. On behalf of this international company, we worked over several years to secure reforms to the Personal Injury Protection (PIP) provisions for automobile insuranc e coverage. Further, we gained approval for legislation that streamlined the agent licensing pr ocess required of all rental car companies in Florida. We worked closely with the Department of F inancial Services to ensure their support of this new structure. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 6 GT Meridian Behavioral Healthcare Scope of Services: State Legislative Representation Length of Contract: 5 years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Maggie Labarta, President & CEO Contact Phone: 352-374-5600 ext. 8221 During the 2009 Session, we assisted in the passage of legislation to restore the Medicaid reimbursement rate for this mental health provider. From the 2005 through 2007 Legislative Sessions, we secured a combined appropriation of ne arly $3 million in the General Appropriations Act for the development of a residen tial treatment program. The funding created and maintained these programs in 11 Florida counties. In fiscally constrained years, the team strategically worked with the leadership and m embers in order to make mental health a budgetary priority. Florida Assisted Living Association Scope of Services: State Legislative Representation Length of Contract: 4 years Status: Current Client Contact Name: Pat Lange, Executive Director Contact Phone: 850-383-1159 On behalf of this professional health care associati on, we secured an additional $2.6 million to increase the rate for the Assisted Living for the E lderly (ALE) waiver. This increase was the only Medicaid provider increase not vetoed by the Govern or in 2006. In 2007, GT successfully passed legislation requiring the Department of Elder Affai rs to adopt a curriculum training program and minimum qualification standards for trainers of Ass isted Living Facility administrators and staff. GT also was successful in securing continuing funding for the Assisted Living for the Elderly Waiver of approximately $35 million. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 7 GT Greenberg Traurig’s Team for Delray Beach Greenberg Traurig is uniquely qualified to represen t Delray Beach in Tallahassee. GT’s professionals are experts at representing municipal ities at the state level. We understand the dynamics of municipal representation and the pressu res and challenges faced by local officials and their staffs. Our team possesses a broad array of substantive and political experience. The team includes a former chief of staff to the Senate President, a former counsel to the Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, and a former Legislative Affairs Director and Deputy General Counsel for Governor Jeb Bush. Fred Baggett would serve as Greenberg Traurig’s tea m leader for Delray Beach. Below is a brief outline on the professional qualifications of our t eam members. Full biographies can be provided on request. Fred W. Baggett is a senior member of the firm’s National Governme ntal Affairs Practice. For the past 30 years, Fred has represented a broad range o f general business community, associations, and governmental entities before federal, state and local agencies and legislative bodies. A significant portion of his practice focuses on matt ers relating to health care, insurance, environment regulation, banking and finance, and bu siness and professional regulation. Fred’s practice also includes policy development and advoc acy as well as administrative litigation. Hayden Dempsey is the Chair of Greenberg Traurig’s Florida Govern mental Affairs Practice and focuses on representing clients before the Florida Legislature and its executive branch agencies. Prior to joining Greenberg Traurig, Hayden served a s Director for Legislative Affairs for Governor Jeb Bush where he gained an in-depth knowledge of t he Legislature and state government. Most recently, he served as Special Counsel to Gov. Rick Scott, overseeing the Governor’s legislative and public policy initiatives. He also worked closely with the Governor’s state agencies in promoting their legislative agendas. H ayden has been named a member of the Board of Directors of Enterprise Florida, Inc., the State of Florida’s official economic development organization. His broad legislative experience pro vides him unparalleled insight into all levels of state government. Gus Corbella is the Director of the Governmental Affairs Practi ce of the firm’s Tallahassee office. Gus has a formidable background in state government , having served as Chief of Staff of the Florida Senate, as well as staff director for the M ajority Offices in both chambers. Gus has been appointed by two Governors to serve as a Commission er on Judicial Nominating Commissions and also serves as the Chairman of the Florida Film and Entertainment Advisory Council. His role as chief advisor to the Legislature’s most prominen t leaders provided Gus with an extensive knowledge of the process and issues before the Legi slature. Leslie Dughi is the Assistant Director of Governmental Affairs, Tallahassee. Leslie's state practice spans more than 20 years and includes all areas of the executive and legislative branches of government. From her representations, Leslie has ga ined in-depth knowledge on the inner- workings of Florida government. Further, she serve d as the Director of Government Affairs for the 135,000-plus member Florida Chamber of Commerce whe re she developed strategic relationships and led many legislative initiatives important to both public and private employers. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 8 GT In addition to her lobbying experience, Leslie has considerable experience in political communications, serving as the Political Director f or Associated Industries, Florida’s largest statewide business association. Throughout her care er she has coordinated numerous grassroots advocacy campaigns and has worked with many Florida statewide and legislative campaigns. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 9 GT Legislative Support Services In addition to our attorneys and lobbyists, Greenbe rg Traurig provides full legislative support services on a continual basis to ensure that our cl ients’ interests never take a backseat at the Capitol. If the legislature is there, we’re there. And if the legislature’s not there, we’re still t here, building staff-to-staff relationships that open doo rs at those critical late-night hours when access and inside information are crucial. This team is led by Director, Anne Bevis, who has o ver 20 years of experience in the legislative process, 15 of those serving the needs of GT client s. Assistant Director, Katie Juckett, who joined the GT team after completing her Master’s Degree in Applied American Politics and Policy, has 6 years of experience. They provide vital services of fered to our clients, including the following: Legislative Tracking Services – We identify and follow all bills of interest to our clients with up-to- the-minute notification of hearings and actions in committee as well as on the House and Senate floors. A focused tracking list is develope d for each client and updated on a daily basis to ensure notification of any movement on priority bills of interest. Moreover, we make sure that clients receive bills texts and amendments of impac t for review and comment on a timely basis. We work to develop a client-directed report ing plan to ensure that clients are kept up-to- date at their desired frequency. Monitoring of Committee and Floor Debate – In addition to the presence of our lobbying team , our support team monitors all debates on legislatio n of major impact to our clients. We also are equipped, in-house, to monitor committee hearings a nd floor actions via audio transmission, The Florida Channel, and internet access. Defensive Review of Filed Legislation and Amendments – Our support team conducts full text searches of all legislation and amendments filed fo r language impacting our clients. This is done through keyword and statute cite searches. This ca pability affords us immediate notification of language entering the process that might be detrime ntal to our clients. Access to Live Calendar – Our firm has access to a live House and Senate Fl oor Calendar. This provides us with the opportunity for up-to-the-minu te review of amendments as they are filed and discussed on the House and Senate Floors. Monitoring of the Press – Our support team daily monitors Florida newspaper s and blogs for press coverage that is applicable to our clients. Research and Drafting Services – The Tallahassee support team is equipped to draf t proposed legislation, amendments and talk sheets on a moment ’s notice. We also have complete research capabilities. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. | gtlaw.com 10 GT Proposed Fee Schedule and Expenses We at Greenberg Traurig look forward to the opportu nity to represent the City of Delray Beach. Our Governmental Affairs team typically provides ser vices on a monthly retainer which allows us to offer a broad range of services and gives our cl ients more value for their money. For this monthly fee, we would commit to provide all of the services enumerated, regardless of the hours required to perform such services. Our proposed fee for the City of Delray Beach is $60 ,000 per year split into 12 monthly installments of $5,000. Based upon past experience , expenses should not exceed $1,000 annually for travel, registrations and other miscel laneous costs. No expense over $100 would be incurred without prior approval by the City. To assist the City in evaluating the scope of work performed under the monthly retainer, we will provide detailed monthly bills outlining the hours worked and work performed. Further, we will meet periodically to evaluate the services performe d to ensure that fair value is provided to the City. City  of  Delray  Beach  ‐ Additional  Information  for  Annual  State  Lobbying  Services   Firm  Name:   Ronald  L. Book, P.A.  Contact  Information:  Ronald  L. Book, 18851  NE  29 th  Avenue, Suite  1010, Aventura, FL  33180,  (305) 935 ‐1866, ron@rlbookpa.com   1.  Number  and  titles  of   lobbying  staff  to  be   assigned  to  City  of  Delray   Beach   Ronald  L. Book, P.A. will  assign  three  firm  lobbyists  to  the  City  of  Delray   Beach, including:  Ronald  L. Book, Esq., President  and  CEO, Kelly  C.  Mallette, Director  of  Government  Affairs  and  Rana  G. Brown,  Government  Affairs  Consultant.  2. List  types  of  additional   costs  above  the  annual   fee, if  any  (i.e. travel,  printing, etc.)      None     3.  Does  your  firm  provide   the  following  services  as   part  of  a  comprehensive   annual  state  lobbying   services  agreement:    a. Lobby  State   Legislature     Yes   b. Lobby  Executive   Branch  and  State   Agencies       Yes   c. Lobbylocal  and  other   agencies  (i.e. Palm   Beach  County, South  FL   Water  Management   District, US  Army  Corp.  etc.).            Yes   d. Meet  regularly  with   City  elected  officials   and/or  staff  (i.e., in ‐ person, conference  call,  etc.)          Yes   e. Develop  City’s  state   legislative  agenda     Yes   f. Provide  weekly   legislative  updates   during  session     Yes.  During  session, we  provide  written  reports  weekly  and  phone  and   e ‐mail  updates  as  necessary  for  priority  issues.  We  also  provide  written   reports  and  updates  coinciding  with  all  interim  committee  meeting   weeks  in  December, January  and  February.  g.  Set  up  meetings  with   State  Legislative  Offices,  Executive  Branch  and         State  Agencies  Yes   4.  Does  your  firm  provide   federal  lobbying  services?   If  so, please  describe.    We  do  not  provide  federal  lobbying  services, but  can  assist  with   arranging  meetings  with  federal  representatives.  a.  If  your  firm  does  not   provide  federal   lobbying  services, but   maintains  contacts  at   the  federal  level  that   could  assist  the  City   with  federal  level   issues, please  describe   the  type  of  assistance   that  may  be  available.  We  can  assist  with  arranging  meetings  with  federal  representatives,  congressional  staff  and  federal  agencies.  We  are  e xtremely  well   accessed  within  the  entire  Florida  Delegation  and  with  many  members   outside  of  the  Florida  Delegation.  b.  If  your  firm  does  not   provide  federal   lobbying  services, but   partners  with  a  firm   that  does, please   describe  the  partner   firm(s) and  services   available.  We  do  not  partner  with  any  firms  that  provide  federal  lobbying  services,  but  could  provide  a  short  list  of  firms  that  we  believe  the  city  should   consider  for  fe deral  lobbying  services.  5.  Provide  information   on  at  least  two  (2) bills   that  your  firm  lobbied  for   or  against  during  the  past   state  legislative  session,  and  provide  a  summary   of  the  final  result.  HB  465  – (Representative  Diaz) District  School  Board  Bonds.  Our  firm   represents  the  Miami ‐Dade  County  School  Board.  This  bill  did  a  couple   of  things  to  allow  District  school  boards  additionally  flexibility  on   bonding  issues.  First, the  bill  increased  the  period  within  which  district   school  board  bonds  must  be  retired  without  approval  from  the   Department  of  Education, from  20  years  to  30  years.   It  also  removed   the  requirement  that  certain  bonds  be  callable  within  10 ‐years  from   date  of  issuance  and  allows  the  district  school  board  to  determine  the   callable  term  of  bonds. This  was  the  second  year  our  firm  worked  to  pass   this  bill  for  the  school  district.  In  2011, the  bill  was  approved  by   legislative  committees, but  stalled  when  the  Governor’s  staff  raised   concerns.  We  worked  with  the  Office  of  the  Governor, the  bill  sponsors   and  school  district  staff  to  address  the  Governor’s  concern.  We  were   successful  and  the  bill  was  approved  by  the  Legislature  in  the  2012   session, and  later  signed  by  the  Governor      SB  58/HB  985  – (Senator  Flores/Representative  Pilon) Lopez  Claims.  This   bill  was  a  claims  bill  against  the  City  of  North  Miami.  For  a  number  of   reasons, the  City  opposed  the  claim, and  asked  us  to  work  against  its   passage.   The  plaintiff  in  the  claim  hired  a  prominent  Tallahassee  firm  to   work  for  passage  of  the  bill.  When  the  bill  was  scheduled  for  a  hearing   in  the  House  Civil  Justice  Subcommittee, we  met  with  the  members  of   the  Committee  to  discuss  the  details  of  the  case  and  the  City’s  position   on  the  bill. The  committee  voted  against  the  bill  and  it  died  in  committee   on  a  vote  of  7  nays/6  yeas.  It  was  the  only  claims  bill  heard  last  session   that  was  defeated  by  the  House  Civil  Justice  Subcommittee.     SB  862/HB  609  – (Senator  Simmons/Representative  Goodson) Wage   Theft.  This  bill  would  have  completely  preempted  Miami ‐Dade  County’s   wage  theft  ordinance.    Miami ‐Dade  County  has  opposed  this  legislation.   We  have  been  successful  in  killing  the  measure  for  the  past  two  sessions,  despite  a  strong  lobbying  effort  by  Florida  business  groups.             Cit y of Delray Beach - Additional Information for Annual State Lobbying Services Firm Name: Weiss, Handler & Cornwell, P.A. Contact Information: Henry B. Handler ; hbh@weissandhandlerpa.com 1 . Number and titles of lobbying staff to be assigned to City of Delray Beach Henry B. Handler Ken Pruitt Meghan Hoza 2 . List types of additional costs above the annual fee , if any (i.e., travel, printing , etc.) Any additional expense must be agreed upon by the City of Delray Beach before it is incurred. 3 . Does your firm provide the following services as part of a comprehensive annual state lobbying services agreement: a. Lobby State Legislature Yes , we maintain an office in Tallahassee. We are in Tallahassee full time during committee weeks and legislative session and frequently when the legislature is not in session. b. Lobby Executive Branch and State Agencies Yes , we maintain close working relationships with professionals in the Gove rnor's office and state agencies. c. Lobby local and other agencies (i.e., Palm Beach County, South FL Water Management District, US Army Corp. etc.). Yes , we currently lobby Palm Beach County for other clients and have close contacts and experience worki ng with Palm Beach County Commissioners, Constitutional Officers and their respective staffs and the South Florida Water Management District. d . Meet regularly with City elected official s and/or staff (i.e., in - person, conference call, etc.) Yes , we make ourselves available to our clients as requested . We are able to meet with City officials and/or staff in Delray Beach or by conference call at any time. e . Develop City’s state legislative agenda Yes , we will also work closely with the Florida League of Cities on any item approved by the City of Delray Beach. f . Provide weekly legislative updates during session Yes . D uring legislative s ession we will provide a weekly summary report detailing legisl ative action taken during the week, status of legislative issues, and anticipated action during the upcoming week . g . Set up meetings with State Legislative Offices, Executive Branch and Yes State Agencies 4 . Does your firm provide federal lobbying services? If so, please describe. Yes, we have many relationships with the Executive Branch, numerous agencies, and both H ouses of Congress. We work on both legislative initiatives and Executive Branch implementation of adopted legislation. The Firm’s Federal lobbying services are coordinated through Joseph Abruzzo . a. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but maintains contacts at the federal level that could assist the City with federal level issues, ple ase describe the type of assistance that may be available. b. If your firm does not provide federal lobbying services, but partner s with a firm that does, please describe the partner firm(s) and services available. 5 . Provide information on at least two (2) bills that your firm lobbied for or against during the past state legislative session , and provide a summary of the final result. 2012 - Successfully passed SB 694 "Specialized Alzheimer's Services Adult Day Care Act ,” which raises the standard of care for adult day care centers by creating a voluntary specialty license for centers that specialize in Alzheimer’s disease and dementia - related disorder services. Approved by the Governor on April 6, 2012. 2012 - Successfully advocated for the passag e of HB 37 “Caylee’s Law ,” a bill that would increase penalties for lying to police when a child goes missing. Caylee’s Law makes it a third -degree felony and increase the penalty from a year to f ive years in prison to give false information to a law enforcement officer in the event of missing child . Approved by the Governor on April 6, 2012. 2012 - Our F irm also successfully advocated for a number of appropriations including: - $1.5 million recurring to fund ten dementia specific daycare centers in Palm Beach, Martin & St. Lucie Counties. - $150,000, which will be used to provide specialized equipment in the care and treatment of dementia specific clients. - $500,000 in funding which will be used to expand the Children’s Crisis Stabilization Unit on New Horizons’ St. Lucie Campus. - $1,083,635 in funding for ChildNet, which was included in $4,665,811 allocated to 10 community -based care agencies to minimize the impacts of the community based care equity model. C:\Documents and Settings \ds \My Documents \City of Delray - Additional Information Sheet.docx Page 1 D RAFT – 11/13/12 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DRAFT 2013 KEY STATE LEGISLATIVE ISSUES TAX REFORM, FINANCE & OTHER BUDGET RELATED ISSUES Develop Fair and Equitable Tax Structure : The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that provides a fair and equitable tax structure an d allows municipalities the flexibility to provide the level of services desired by their citizens. Legislation should be developed that SUPPORTS simplifying and stabilizing Florida’s state and local tax revenue structure in a manner that provides fairness for both citizens and businesses of our state, while addressing the realities that the current statewide constitutional taxing structure imposes on all levels of government. Arb itrary caps on property assessments, municipal expenditures or municipal reven ues , including Tax Payer Bill of Rights (TABOR) proposals, should be OPPOSED . Unfunded Mandates to Local Governments: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislat ion that strengthens the prohibition on existing and new unfunded mandates, requires enhanced staff analyses and quantification of the costs to cities and ensures full funding sources be assigned whenever unfunded mandates are identified. The legislature s hould SUPPORT revisions to the current unfunded mandates provision of the Florida Constitution that would eliminate unnecessary exemptions. The revision should also ensure that any proposed law which contains an unfunded mandate contain only a single subje ct matter and be enacted by three -fourths vote of each house of the Legislature, only after a duly noticed public hearing at which a current fiscal analysis is available. Communication Services and Local Business Taxes - The City of Delray Beach OPPOSE S legislation that restricts or eliminates the authority of municipalities to levy, collect and /or expend the communications services tax and the local business tax. Page 2 D RAFT – 11/13/12 Municipal Pension Plans : The City of Delray Beach OPPOSES legislation that diminishes mun icipal control over municipal employee pension plan management and funding or that increases municipal funding liabilities. The Cit y will SUPPORT legislation that provides comprehensive municipal firefighter and police officer pension reform and a ny compre hensive pension reform package should address the issue of flexibility in the use insurance premium tax revenues i n place of the prev ious requirement that additional revenues be used for new, “extra” pension benefits. Police Officer and Firefighter Disabilit y Presumptions : The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that modifies the current statutory disability presumptions for firefighters and law enforcement officers relating to tuberculosis, heart disease, or hypertension . HOME RULE Public Officers/Severance Pay: The City SUPPORTS the repeal of SB 88 , passed in 2011 , that restricts severance pay for any public officer, agent, e mployee or contractor. The bill removes Home Rule authority over severance pay by creating a limit of up to 20 weeks of severance pay . Regulation of Firearms and Ammunition: The City SUPPORTS the repeal of HB 45, passed in 2011, which prohibits the City from implementing enforcement action pol icies regarding firearms and ammunition regulation. PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES Fireworks Regulation: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that strengthens state and local regulations on the sale of fireworks and their illegal use. The City of Delra y Beach OPPOSES legislation that limits local regulation, or enforcement, of illegal fireworks. Texting While Driving: The City of Delray Beach SUPP ORTS the modification of traffic statutes to include texting while driving as an element of careless driving. Sober Houses: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that provides for more stringent local regulation of these facilities. The City als o SUPPORTS full enforcement of existing state regulations on substance abuse provider licensing . Pursuant to 65D -30.003, Florida Administrative Code, all substance abuse components must be provided by persons or entities that are licensed by the Departmen t of Children and Families (DCF ), unless otherwise exempt from licensing. Page 3 D RAFT – 11/13/12 Synthetic Drugs: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation banning the manufacture, possession, distribution, purchase or sale of synthetic drugs, including herbal incense, b ath salts, synthetic marijuana and/or any cannabinoids in the state of Florida and also encourages funding for drug abuse education. TRANSPORTATION ISSUES Transportation Funding: The City of Delray Beach SUPPORT S legislation that provides proportiona te, dedicated and recurring revenue sources for multi -modal municipal and regional transportation projects to ensure that local conditions and needs are addressed . The City will SUPPORT legislation that: Authorizes the Florida Department of Transportatio n to increase funding to support local and regional transportation and transit alternatives, including “complete street” programs Prohibits the transfer of State Transportation Trust Funds for non - transportation pu rposes Transportation Funding : The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that provides opportunities for additional revenue options to fund municipal transportation infrastructure projects. South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA): The City of Delray Beach OPPOSES any change s to the membership of the SFRTA that would remove the SFRTA’s independent authority to appoint three (3) local citizen appointees. The City also OPPOSES any changes to the SFRTA’s statutory authority to expend local funding that is provided to the SFRTA. Red Light Cameras: The City OPPOSE S legislation that repeals the current authorization in the Florida Statutes for red light camera programs . PLANNING RELATED ISSUES Outdoor Advertising : The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation th at provides the home rule authority of municipalities to more strictly regulate outdoor signage, including billboards. Internet Cafes : The Cit y SUPPORTS legislation that will either regulate businesses operating internet “sweepstakes” gaming activities under the gaming commission, or find them in violation of F lorida S tatues - Chapter 849 and prosecuted accordingly. Page 4 D RAFT – 11/13/12 H ou sing : The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation providing $300 million for the national foreclosure settlement agreement to designated neighborhood stabilization programs to be used for existing local government affordable housing initiatives. ENVI RONMENTAL ISSUES Beach Renourishment : The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation preserving funding within the Ecosystem Management and Restoration Trust Fund , to support beach restoration projects throughout the State . This funding is important to th e City of Delray Beach due to the ongoing renourishment project for our 2.65 mile beach. Both State & Federal Funding for this project are critical to this important, ongoing project. Water Management District Governance and Authority : The City of Delray Beach will support legislation that amends the powers and duties of the water management districts. Such legislation should: Require legislative ratification of any proposed rule change proposed by a water management district that imposes a financi al impact on a local government , and Specify that water management districts have no authority to require local government adoption or repeal of ordinances or to mandate the review or approval of any ordinance . VOTING & PUBLIC INFORMATION Referendum Campaign Involvement: The City of Delray Beach will SUPPORT legislation to remove restrict ions in F.S. 106.113 that prohibit a local government, or any person on the local government’s behalf, from spending public money to advocate for the passage or defeat of any issue, referendum, or amendment going to a public vote. Early Voting Sites : Th e City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation which would permit the Supervisor of Elections with the option to designate any permanent public facility as an early voting site. Public Notices : The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS legislation that would author ize municipalities to provide public notice and advertising by means other than newspapers (i.e. Internet posting and other suitable alternatives). Page 5 D RAFT – 11/13/12 APPROPRIATION ISSUES Judicial System Funding : The City of Delray Beach strongly SUPPORTS the full fundin g of the State Attorney, Public Defender offices and the Judiciary. R educed court funding has a significant impact on public safety due to the inability to complete the processing of cases. The City makes arrests, but the court system is so overwhelmed d ue to reductions in funding that cases are “no filed” or “nolle prossed” by the State Attorney’s office or lost in court due to speedy trial requirements. Thus, full funding of the court system to include the Juvenile Assessment Centers statewide is criti cal to public safety. The City also SUPPORTS the following revenue enhance me n t s for the court system: E xpansion of the $65 mandatory court fee to be applied to civil cases in addition to the already allowed criminal cases. This fee would allow for additio nal revenue to fund the state court system. C ontinuation and enhancement of the $2.00 recording fee to be distributed to counties to fund court -related technology needs. F ull funding for statewide traffic hearing officer programs. EMS Grants : The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS continued funding of the Florida Emergency Medical Services’ (EMS) matching grant programs provided by the Florida Department of Health - Bureau of Emergency Medical Services. The programs are authorized to improve and expand EMS statewide. Parks and Recreation Funding : The City of Delray Beach SUPPORTS expanded funding of the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) under the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). This program provides importan t financial assistance to local governments for development and/or acquisition of land for public outdoor recreational purposes. MEMORANDUM TO:Mayor and City Commissioners FROM:David T. Harden, City Manager DATE:November 9, 2012 SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM WS.4 - SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2012 DISCUSSION REGARDING PENSION FUND MANAGEMENT ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION Commissioner Carney requested that the management o f the City's pension funds be placed on a Work Session agenda for discussion. BACKGROUND The first table attached compares the acturial inve stment earnings over the last 12 years for both the General Employee's Pension Plan and the Police and Fire Pension Plan. The two following attachemnts carry the comparison all the way back to 1985. In both time periods the General Employee's Plan has earned more, on average, than the Police and Fire P lan. The next two exhibits show the administrative expen ses of the two plans. Expenses of the Police and Fire Plan appear to be about five times the expense s of the General Employee's Plan. RECOMMENDATION Commission direction is requested regarding any fur ther information you may wish to receive or persons you may wish to meet with regarding managem ent of these pension plans. MEMORANDUM TO:Mayor and City Commissioners FROM:Lula Butler, Director, Community Improvement THROUGH:David Harden, City Manager DATE:November 8, 2012 SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM WS.5 - SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2012 POLICY ON NAMING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES ITEM BEFORE COMMISSION City Commission consideration of establishing a pol icy and procedures to govern the honorary naming of public places. BACKGROUND The policy is intended to add meaning, significance and uniformity to the honorary naming of public facilities, to minimize conflict and to provide a f orum for meaningful discussion regarding naming. In addition, a consistent naming policy lends continui ty and a sense of community and establishes a means of appropriately recognizing prominent individuals and those who have substantially contributed to the City, the State or the Nation. This proposed process can generate opportunities to induce dynamic community impact, create sensitivity and lasting public relations, express a ppreciation, and can serve as a means of education. For purposes of this policy, a public place means a ny building, facility, park lands, and other public spaces owned by or under the control of the the Cit y, including interior and component spaces integral to the whole. This policy does not govern the naming of streets, per the direction of the City Commission, which adopted the following policy on January 25, 1994: "It is the policy of the City Commission of the Cit y of Delray Beach, Florida not to entertain requests for the changing of street names in order to recogn ize or honor individuals." The following words will have the meaning attribute d to them: A. “Civic or Charitable Group”shall mean a non-profit entity or group that has made a substantial contribution to the community, either t hrough civic involvement, involvement in historic events relevant to specific City property, or to the geographical location of specific City property; or made a financial and/or in-kind donation to support a specific public service or City property. For-profit entities of any type shall not be considered a civic or charitable group. B. “Individual”shall mean a person who has made a substantial cont ribution to the community, either through civic involvement, involvement in hi storical events relevant to the specific City property, financial contribution or to the geo graphical location of specific City property. C. “Honorary Naming Rights”shall mean the naming of City property to honor the service, commitment, or other type of participation by an in dividual, or civic or charitable group. D. “Properties”refers to City assets including, but not limited to , real property, facilities, parks, features (e.g. rooms, playgrounds, etc.) and other assets, but not including streets and lanes. E. “City Property” shall mean City-owned or controlled real property, public facilitie s such as buildings or parks, features or attributes of a fac ility such as a bench, tree, bridge, walkway, hallway or room, or other public venue. PROCESS : The process to establish honorary naming rights for City property shall be as follows: Any City Commissioner, citizen, group of citizens, or entity or organization may submit an honorary naming proposal to name City property after an indi vidual, civic or charitable group. The naming right s proposal shall be in writing and shall be reviewed by the City Manager or his/her designee, and if fou nd to be in compliance with applicable City policies, shall be referred to a naming committee established under this policy. Honorary naming proposals must include the credenti als, character and reputation of the individual, civic or charitable group for whom the naming is be ing considered. As such, nominations submitted for consideration must be accompanied by appropriate su pporting documentation. The City shall establish a “Facility Naming Committ ee” to review and make recommendations to the Commission on naming proposals. The membership of the committee shall be comprised of representatives from City departments (designated b y the City Manager), plus representation from advisory groups, or friends, or recognized support groups with an interest in the property or facility to be named. The Facility Naming Committee shall review the merits of the naming proposal and supporting documentation as submitted and any other applicable history or other information deemed pertinent to the request. The committee shall conve ne meetings as necessary. After considering the naming rights proposal, the c ommittee will provide their recommendation to the Commission, providing supportive information as app ropriate to justify the recommendation. The City Commission shall consider the committee re commendation. The approval of any honorary naming nomination shall be by resolution of the Cit y Commission. RECOMMENDATION City Commisison direction. n,- 'v SAFETY As FLORIDIANs EXPECT "Help Florida become the most motorist, pedestrian and bicyclist friendly state in the USA" November 7, 2012 Safety As Floridians Expect (SAFE) fully supports the conditional use application of Atlantic Plaza ll, as proposed conditioned on the following: 1. The applicant will work with the city of Delray Beach and TDM experts to include features in the project that will minimize the traffic load on Atlantic Avenue, particularly as it may impact the traffic at the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, and north of NE 18t street on 7th Avenue. 2. The applicant will encourage the city to utilize the previously agreed to $150,000 shuttle funding to improve service, reduce wait time, and expand service beyond what exists today. 3. The applicant will consult with a TDM expert on initiatives which could be imple- mented by Atlantic Plaza Il; and, host a meeting with these experts and other interested parties 4. The applicant will implement an employee transportation program that offers financial incentives for employees to use alternative means of transportation 5. The applicant will support traffic improvements at NE first and 6th and NE first and 7th that are designed and endorsed by the adjacent community and the city of Delray to mitigate any increased traffic in this area associated with the project re- development. In the event it is determined by those parties that a new traffic signal and right turn lane at NE First and 6th is appropriate and desired and assuming sufficient right of way exists to accommodate such right turn lane, the developer agrees to pay for such improvements. Similarly if such a determination is made to close 7th north of First, the developer agrees to pay for such closure not to exceed $20,000. 6. The applicant will work with SAFE, Delray and FDOT to maximize pedestrian safe crossing of Atlantic between 7th and Veteran's Park. 7. The applicant will, in addition to public bike racks placed throughout the project site, provide both tenant and employee inside bicycle storage facilities. Employee facilities will also include lockers and showers. For the Board: James E. Smith SAFE Chairman Charles T. Bonfie SAFE President �N LEGENDS '. I A" PEDESTRIAN RETAILIDINING STREET (B) NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (C) COVERED VALET nD RAMPTO LOWER LEVEL PARKING GARAGE (E) PARKING GARAGE IS LEVELS) O FOCALVEHICULAR PLAZA (�G,'l 'GREEN WALL' FEATURE (H) RESIDENTIAL COMMONAREA I 1 WATER FEATURE RESIDENTIAL ROUNDABOUT K )'GREEN ROOF' L' ROOFTERRACE rx it d�r e GUILDIhJG I j BUILDING 11 - ti; RfiRlt REtNII RETAIL OINING n!!Jl,J\. ,l,. „1� ,.. +ems• ATLANTIC AVENUE _,. a.... k..>. ti +••r:•r>w+'\wiiff:wti�,...t:i'' ..,. .1 �.w� ., Ali Sp N ' N c N � > N e O N y m a M of 1; 0 > � LL 1 r U � C u ILI oats to 5- z sew n, tJOlw vu•_ _ tae ASP 1 -t To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- /development project in a generation. Name AtA � NA a /� V1 o �w! lL VvZ Address ,I/Al (Z- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date Qly A To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the, prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and 1 do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email A dress, if you would like to receive updates. h r PP14 c� f I R` ` To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case forwhy the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Nam Address VAA - . Lt /(�� 5 1 // --�-> Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. rJ �tl Z il E L1t' -� Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 41W 1 --Z, Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the snaring of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- ) development project in a generation. CA Cane \faVe2 Name D,q- �J �/ * W4 Address Al Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address J Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address .1 Id St . Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. c/Y' 1 13/ a Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- elopment Lject n a generation. Z�y Name i i oil Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed forthe most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project i�7 generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address �3 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ,) Name Address � t� � v,,a- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- developm t project in a generation. Name Address �L 6�- �Ko u� � i L (� � 6 �- - LVV/11� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name 1LMt Address 1 v Z.. o— \ \ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. ,,,,fit �i1Z Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a eneration. v v� Name Address 2-611 Z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. , Pan human i k 704 WE 5 +h S�r�e� �eiraN mac �► Name Address 13 2 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- deve opment project in a generation. r Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date / ZI f /7, 0 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. T o /0 Name Address 11113 /))-- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- evelopment project in a generation. Address le'k 6— � �) ��) � - Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date / /// -31112---- To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name 16 S Address Y� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development pro'ect in a generation. R Name AddressL`$� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- . I Date ale(] •sa;epdn anlaaaa o} alII pinom noAll'ssaappy IIew3 ssaappy aweN •uolleaauaS a ul;oafoid }uawdolanap -aa IsaS iel aqj sluosaadai legm uo uolslaap Alseg a alew pinogs AID aqj anallaq jou op I pue ;ndul alignd lewlulw uaaq seq a.aagl •apew uaaq jou seq paslnaa aq pinogs slenoadde aoud aqj Agm,aol asea aql pue fsluaplsaa A4lo of paleolunwwoo -Ilam uaaq lou seq ueld pasodoid aql— ssaaoad leno.iddy g -All:) aqj uo pedwl aqj aulwaaiap of aanew slq uo slsAleue ao salpnis ou auop seq Al10 aqj •dlgsaaumo awoq of }uawllwwoa Suoals a aiinbaa Illm }uawdolanap slgjlo uolleaol aalwa.id aqj pue aleos anlssew aql •saaIua.i op uegj saauaplsaa of daaldn pue eaueualulew aallaq apino.id siaumo awoq jegj IeoldAl sI 31 -shun paumo- AlaIenud ueq; aaglea lelua.i to Aluofew a aol sapinoid ueld pasodo.id aql :saauaplsaa Ieluaa .j7 'Inlssaoons uanoad seq SulaaauiSua slgl aaagm eppo13 glnoS ul saldwexa Aue papinoad jou aneq saadolanap aq} aaagm Bullied punoiSiapun aol sapino.id osle 11 gaea8 Aealaa umolumop to ea.ie slgl uI Bullied lela.aawwoo puailaam A.aessaoau pue algealsap ssa.ippe jou saop pue Sul}nwwoaala} to eaa ue ul ollslleaaun sl uolldwnsse slg; `spualaam Sulpnlaul Aep Agana xaldwoo aqj wo.il Aeme aoeld a o; Jl sanup pue alolgaA auo Aluo seq juaplsaa Agana legs sawnsse;egj s;ualsue,i} pue sluaplsaa Aq saoeds Bullied to Suuegs aqj got lesodo.id a sapnloul ueld slgl :Sullied E Aep aqj to lied anlIae Isow aqj got pamopegs pue papegs aq pinom galgm'lied s,ueJDIaA to asn aqj saslwoidwoa AllueolllugIs pue juawdolanapaa slgjlo aleas pue adoas anlssew aqj saseaaaul aaq:pn} uolldwaxa slgl •:l 09 o} spualxa pue 1lwll •Il 817 juai ina s,gaea8 Aeala(7 spaaaxa ueld pasodaad aqj :3gSlaH -Z „e a s -a q; -Aq -a S e I l l A„ e se uollelndaa alaolslq pue pauaea paeq ano pue anuany oljueljylo aaloeaega aqj q }lm juaIslsuoa aq pinogs aleos pue ualsap aq I '1:)OIplaS a419uljeSIAeu awll apssodwl ue aneq Illm saapuodsaa Is.ild -uoseas ano gul.anp mou looip iO le si galgm'agpue anuany alluel }y aqj wog} spaeA le.aanas saseaaaul aaeds lelaaawwoa pue uol;elndod jueallluSls aq} to pedwl aqj palenlena AlgSnoa041Iou seq Al!J aq1. •fop slp umolumop.ano to japejep Ielaads aql ule;ulew of Iewl }do aq of paulwaalap Alsnolnaad goeag Aealaa ul siauueld All:) leq} Allsuap aqj salgnop ueqj aaow slgl •(sopuoo 0£t pue lejuaa ZI£) slIun lelluaplsa.a Zbt, 01 panoadde pue palelloSau Alsnolnaad Wam leq; sopuoa L6Z aqj wo.il s}lun lelluaplsai to aagwnu Ielol aqj Oulaq pinom aseanul slgl -ane gad shun 0£ to auluoz ao juaaana s,goea8 Aealaa to ssaoxa ul gel sl a.aoe gad shun lel;uaplsa.i TO-TS to Al!suap a smolle ueld pasodo.id aqj :Allsuaa i :suoseaa Sulmollol aql jol spooq.aoggBlau lueaglA pue lue:podwl lsow s,gaeaq Ae.alaa to auo ul aoaawwoa pue alll to A}llenb ag} ape Sap Al}uauewaad pue AllueollluSls Illm ueld pasodo.id aqj Jegj anallaq I 'paeoe SuluoZ pue auluueld Aq (ZTOZ aagoIap) pano.rdde Alluaaaa sem;egl II ezeld a13uel }y to ueld juawdolanap pasodo.id aq; ano.adde;ou siauolsslwwoa Alp a41 legl Isanbai Allnl}aadsa.i I eplao13 'gaea8 Aealaa to AID 'saauolsslwwo0 ATO pue aoAeA aql :ol To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name J Address 6t C Z_ mail Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. L Name dress Email Address, if you woulld like to receive updates. D To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "vi I lage -by -th e- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assunies that every resident has fnly one vehicle - ard.drives -.,t to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. -7 7 % N. O CI1q )() Name Address S� �� - /`7 c �¢ V C V �� y4 v( 7 L %D , cow )13 / Z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. r� 2o(3 4J W0 Name kP-)60 Address .cam /I -13 -12- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- de ment project in a generation. Name Address /eQ/Nol ca-1 -1 0 J7 , (FmsN. Cowl / // Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address ,r ' 1 1 C t 10 ID N C ( U ru ��� �( S� C f Dowt" � cz—y-�_ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. J Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal forthe sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 42 1 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address y'iPrn l �' �1 �r e-�1 Gl J r�i� r tY1 1.I I S i Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- developme� t project in a generation. 7�k Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Namee/ Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. J/�4 W zAt Name Address Q� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date C04 0 rk � '01 0-t 0 / - To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. e_4M V L U'O iye,S Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Cu7E_ C-. DiV8.K �_, YAH00.eok Date ti /8 lacia To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. o Name V, M0', Q Address 60 , coy Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date /? / I -- U To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. "✓ :�� � � � %Llc.�i !fit G�- Name v? v Ifiu c Address ,TGV iI 69- Zf Z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name n -uwt�r i i tiC -4AK -, Avg, 4+ �- - �9 9- Cc Address 11 -f -201y Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Care 2q /1/C 7 L��w. Name k / Address (J,6& ad (001 (W vie Wwtfer Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date t S:�- To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 11__ tA�, L e, ,/J _71--k 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address /AAR -r,1,i Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. G-.— t fiY1f'�`rJ - Name C C4 -0 Address >,_ ne:�'- / / 2- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. \^ Name tC12Cl� I� L Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development prp'ect in a eneration. Name Y /4 Address Aa Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name i i t cAtC-Je v co . 37-1 ao", Address I1' Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. S r CIA r ud_� Nam Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date V-, - �3 TYd To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. W� c Name Address 5 ca P) �J CS, Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 6W / il� / _,�T Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. m ! Pal �'� 1 Na a Address W W Lre .6- L � C3 ail Address, ifyou would like to receive updates. Date � ell Xis To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation Name ,�vFI T_PT -i(0- Addre e5�fc; FL- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date a To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. M I c /-/A- 64- Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. r( , 7- Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ee c J Name ��� Address 1'C R �1'C`i C` �Y "�" OLI Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ZA L <,a Name Address / / - d- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address cq- /l VIC Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. iC Jul Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Z_ 3) Name r Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. 4 3�4, 1 - Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. /A zz�) �2cp J Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. // / �-- Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Ibb roo N Address EmoiyAddress, if you would like to receive updates. Date /Zoll To- The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida i respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed Plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce In one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: i . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 134 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Reach previously determined to be Optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an imPosslbie time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a „village -by -the -sea" . 2. Height. The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to Bb ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives It to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples In South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the Impact on the City. 5. Approval process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been m' ade. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ,�� -/— L, Name Address Contact information rn - d Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners. City of Delray Beach, Florida I- I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed develoMent plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce In one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre Is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acne. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown betray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples In South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development wits require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the Impact on the City. S. Approval Process — The proposers plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been m* ade. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 2L Name Addnm Contact Information Date Tn - a To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Defray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commtssloners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza it that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanerrtly degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray beach's current zoning of 3(I units per acre. This Increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach Previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the Impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea'. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives It to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples In Soutar Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences; The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysts on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name 9�e -z 3- Contact Information rn•d Address Date // 7 / ;�- To- The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the cfty commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Hoard. I believe that the proposed plan wifI significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce In one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons. I . Density; The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This Increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners In Delray Beach Previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the grkifock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-see. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Defray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to BO ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends, this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Mental Residences; The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units, It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysts on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case fof by the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal Dublic Name and 140 not believe the city should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- Address Contact Information Date Tn - Cl WWI To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Fidrida i respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce In one of Delray peach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density-, The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 3o units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and M condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the Impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Impassible time navigating the gridlock, The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea', 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Defray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to fit# ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed forthe most active Part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every msident has only one vehicle and drives ft to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends; this assumption Is unrealistic In an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences, The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the Impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been welt- communicated to city residents; and the case fqr why the prior approvais4ouid be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public ihput and I do not bellevehe City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development projecti -A a,,reneration. Name Contact Information Address ZL712-Ig)ZZ,,- Date .,.., �., ,�o. • - - - -- - - - - To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name It Address 6s --k, �cea <t�� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. } %_11 Date f ( /o J/ JL- To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 14161 -44 Name Address // //.2,Aw Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Na e N Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address LJL 6 t4 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not b ieve the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- d el ` Int r in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. 11.) Z Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 24�,_ ZXP-dt_ .2&0 N.- Of Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the City commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project i generation. �S Name Address I Iv-, aQt r2Qv0_S Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the City commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. WO 131 E v2T T Name"" U Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. S ��c VO AA 3 343 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- v to entprsj in a generation. v`T`e e .; Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza it that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development Proiect in a veneration_ Name r I U \n Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1 2. 9 5 Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Na e I 1 +( Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. S ,qty d� Fft Name Q Address —Av L f/ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza Il that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal forthe sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process – The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development projectt in a— generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza Il that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name,, _Address Cf Z� CC-�') C4,) Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date //// zllz To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address cmearapflgv 8 hguscu'4 • i AJU)J // 17&7_ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza it that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development pro' ct in a generation. 1 V 1-2- 12 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- d epment project in ,generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 50 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. CName dress 6 AJ© V l Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address rte- e1no -4-t-- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name (�� Address >) - C� - 1:?- Email Address, if you wouT&tfl<ito receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process -The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. LZf _ f Name Address cza VA-1 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 11'/ --, /1.2 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �Z_A�_) ccx_�� 1119 0 6: 2 > Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address j/ 1 I z- I ?/ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receiv & -up es. c4 "� �,7 '� �� (Z _ Date ice. To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ka-kl-u . &9 N "- X23 S Uar �a� 1 (Name Address ha er 1, con, 4v/ D Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in %generation. Rwr • loot Name Address A1104 A'S Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this tt the impact on the City. ma er to determine 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generat' 4;4 - "I 1W_ --- Name a a go S'. tL I Address, if you wo Address Uc.A N Df like to receive ulpa O 13L VA 1W LIP !.3V 13 'Ah sPf' Date //// a h To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input a� n l do t believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- develo en roje in a nera ion. 14 IF Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. ( f I t- I. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address �2p Vie ✓S c °,-�t //.,z A7- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address /C gv Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address // /IQ-.,) /.,?,- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit a,nd extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a eneratio Name Address ..1 & 11 IV (A",- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development oject in a generatign. oft I Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. N i s s• Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. A 44 fit r • Name Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. err ray /a�„� �� Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. L Sy Oct 0*" 4 Aiv '® gad m e, Co 4 10 14re s be., No . Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or anal sis on th" the impact on the City. Y is matter to determine S. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. W (< Name KA Address ko I: LV Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. »44'3 Date % * VP % t", ftw=% To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 2 0 4. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "v i I l a g e -by -the -s ea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address A n. %t,l� P!. 3 `b `f9 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft, This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Haaress , - Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. 3 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- elopment project in a generation. Ll Name Address 2C-, I o U V a- t.1 V\ e Cv_ � eVYYA_0L1L (11 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date 11 t3 ly To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012 by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos ). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like/fo receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners nowt approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 1 r /7-- II_ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 0 3343 ame Address I Y !L Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address a,V -� l � . 1 tea. �0 >r �- r�,,,s �► Z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissionertnot pprove the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 201lanning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. . First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Address 11 12:d 1 7--- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- d elopment project generation. Name Address A1 L7__L1 �L_ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not pprove the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ' - 7 Name Address I 7 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic 40 Plaza li that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. •.+ , •v Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- dev ment projes in a generation. oo Name Address To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: ] . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. j i f Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza Il that was recently approved (October 2012] by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- deveig pmenypr ct . a generation. Name Address Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. I 17,__1 it Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012 Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- ment project in a generation. Name / nAddress 1 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date a To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this mater to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. (ooz, � i;� i -'f� .S "4_ L �.7 �s��itr_.x.�r !`l_2ciC k d Name Address Y ' t Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012)by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Na 00a) 5� (c3e 7A Address /i Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012fiy Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. G Name Address I VAJ r7,-- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012My Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. r^� Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida L I respectfully request that the city commissioners not pprove the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 201Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 0 00 &1A Name /! Address C) J 10000e, Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Y Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �p I ooa a Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. O Name Address 1 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. **,I /.,J Name Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Mate To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address /2 -/� v- i 4-- Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name y yo o tad to c. Address oew cb Contact Information Date 1 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address �70At)dreams 4e, Contact Information Date or Z, To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process – The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development p. oject in a generation. Name Address — //_ 7-/ 2�1 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of'Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard eamed and historic reputation as a "vil lage -by -th e- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day, 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident hat only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project �n a generation. Name Address //-7--/-Z-. Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public nptit and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re d e1R project in a generation. O 6J/ �9�k Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex eve.-,+ day inc!uding weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i-,) o sic c� a Ck Name Address I Contact Information � � Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re development project in a generation.���� �. Name Address R Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a gen tion. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. rl-b Name Address ll-5 =2� /Z Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public iryp}�it and I do not beli a the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- . velopment p ojec a generation. Ayu Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �_l ) f �, ­7 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ?OAS& U0 rt"* Wps Name Contact Information Addresjjs''" Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address / L �l 12 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft, This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft, limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do!not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development` project igJ A'generation. � Name ` Address ('�. f 1 I Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- deyelopment project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development proje n a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date ///ZZ /Z- To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public inp and I do no believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- devel e t r ject in a generation. c 1 1c /t/crlrg� J( Name Address G0M Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date ///I' / � / Zi To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- evelopment projec in a generation. Name Address lo, d� v Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a °village -by- the - sea ". - 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i51^2iC�/ Name Address n od Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. NaQ li�i i` t ���► i w' I _3HO Address _1� �Aman 1+ Cie Il'5t I-4, nE-E- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 147 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date k,,J� a) C%/t'l�r �itGi To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. R Name R E Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Zi Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. i. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. N Address Contact Information V Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Ll f t- Name Address Contact Information 1 A3. % Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. On 4& A'All V,� Lome Address ntact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza If that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership, The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. r Name % / // Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. J t rl(�J A A_J Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address // --5--1 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address fi �,J GU, ,A , Contact Information I1 I J- l Z Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. J,g V1 I CL ✓'. �..�- 4-`i Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Goi- LIM Name Address (t I I Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. a & A (�e a d- 3r S%o Cq- Name Address Contact Information Date r To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Nam Contact Information Address Date r, !r To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. A,c1q CA14AyiAlCtiM, j ?&4& &Lo Name �1 �0, 3 Contact Information -t Address l V_ /Z Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Ft- 7:S-9 7 Address_( Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 1/• F _.�oi� Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information r, 4 `� Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza fl that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds.Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. _V34( Name Address (1 1311 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input ands o not b lieve the City should make a hasty decision on what re res the largest re- develo m t proj in a generation. Name �(, f�� �-% �, Address r Contact Information To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza If that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Na rR e Contact Information aaa,essa� T �u�' Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address A by Contact Information Date py To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- project in a 6 Name rCQ� C r C. 3 Address S y Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address r 'L Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �4e. ��l/ /✓z' 7 ��(J r Name Address ✓ �l// Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date i/ 6 ;D/ To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. CI Name Address t Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. / ,7u 7 Name Address 4 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Z2 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a �19 ii � /' 1 1%' Fri Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name NO Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name � >� A dress Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date n To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 11 10 l Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name �z Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 72-5 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. _l a ,? Address l -AJ Date Email Address, if jould like to receiv ate . To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address ov ,� ko 36 K Email Address, it you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address ///Z/ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. IkJU\_I _ I 7, 0q- Ip Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date Jln,_ To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Na) Address Z // - // - Jc;�, Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. A Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza fl that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and 'historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 50 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. ^+. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address •-7 --p u i- .-7 . -_ o: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfufly request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Deiray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Deiray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact.of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a °village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. �. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommutin9 and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Deiray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has prover, successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address To, The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Fk dda I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will signiiicantiy and Permaneri* degrade the quality of life and commerce In one of Delray Beach's mast Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density, The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners In Delray Beach Previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the lmpM of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock, now during our season. First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ", 2. Height: The Proposed plan exceeds Defray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extQnds to 60 ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan indudes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends, this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier Iocatlon of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents: and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. 'There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. -F� E. 771 J /1 A) J C L A Al u E R 4 �l C� H1131Cf /f fZ L fAN i A lr _� � f Name Address � ✓ " � u'. I1 G(� 2 ,i� li fJ l�� c:� i-�1. [ �`)i._ i' I % (,:� � .2 J / �- Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Nam �,Vt ' G' l� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- ent project in a.generation. W(I - I-- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. '� —"\ f Name Address \.\., � � \ - cl_ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. r� Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. U� 6er ba. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and. I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. me Address L/ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. d-d // 2 - Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Gj /V Gv / 4 Name Address ;n > S IN <-14- %1IAd / (j �� �G1 Z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The (Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Defray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza if that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: f . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residentiw units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- evelopment project in a generation. Name Address J f q(1 'L L2C,,- q! V,-�x� 11 . ce-V.1" //,//,v //Z- Contact information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida i respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea'. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft, This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day, 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Defray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process –The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case L—why prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public n t believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- nt pr ' ct in a generation. 0/ AIE Name �6o 9 Address it r� 1 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 01 �l Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: ]. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- t project in a generation. c/<L / /7 �G � ,2 0-/� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- developme t, project in a generation. At Name Address 04,2 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. � Zj Vi..v � (� �- ��l�y i f%l✓:e,tJ C�� 1��'�l `!��L,IC_., `Tc__ Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. y� �yz ame ✓`�D ��m (f�a r ( qeacA - 2c-ff3 Address // / // C) / [/,)- - Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date ale(] •salepdn aAlaoaa 01 aj!I pinom noAI! 'ssaappy I!ew3 ssaappy aLUeN •uo!le.aau@B e ui pafoad juawdolanap -aa Isagael aql s}uasa.adai legm uo uo!sloap Alseg a ajew pinogs AI!o aq; ana!laq IOU op 1 pue indu! ollgnd Iewlulw uaaq seq aaagl • @pew uaaq IOU seq paSIAaa aq pinogs slenoadde ao!ad aql Aqm aol aseo aq} pue fsluap!saa Al!:) o} paleolunwwoo -Ilam uaaq IOU seq ueld pasodoad aql— ssaooad lenoaddy •A}!D aqj uo pedw! aqj @u!waalap of gal ew s!qj uo s!sAleue ao sa!pn }s ou auop seg Ai!:) agl •d!gs.iaumo @wog of luawl!wwoo Buo.ils a aa!nba.a 11!m juawdolanap S14J Jo uo!leool a@!waad aqj pue aleos aA!ssew aql •saalua.i op uegl saouap!sa.i of daa>Idn pue aoueualu!ew .aall@q ap!noad siaumo awoq leq} Ieo!dAj s! 11 s4!un paumo- AI@Ienlad uegl aaglea Ieluaa }o Al!.iofew a ao} sap!Aoid ueld pasodoad aql :saouap!sa,d Ieluad •t In}ssaoons uano.ad seq Su!.aa@u!2lua s!ql aaagm epuo13 qlnoS u! soldwexa Aue pap!noad IOU aneq saadolanap aqj aaagm Suil ied puno.ig.aapun aoj sap!Ao.id osle 11 goeag Aealaa umolumop }o ea.ae s!ql u! Su!lied Ie!oaawwoo pualaam Aiessaoau pue algea!sap ssa.ippe IOU saop pue Su!}nwwooalal to e.aa ue ui o!lslleaaun si uo!}dwnsse s!gl'spualaam 21u!pnloul Aep Agana xaldwoo aq; woaj Aeme aoeld a of j! sanup pue alolgaA auo Aluo seq luap!saa Agana leql sawnsse a_egl s;ualsue.rl pue sluap!saa Aq saoeds Su!j.aed }o Suuegs aql aol Iesodoid a sapnloui ueld s!ql :SulNaed •Aep a41 }o lied aA!Ioe Isow aqj aol pamopegs pue papegs aq pinom ga!gm'ilaed s,ue.aaIaA 10 asn aql sas!wo.idwoo Al}ueo!}!uSis pue juawdolanapaa s141 10 aleos pue adoos aA!ssew aqj saseaaoui aaglanj uol;dwaxe s!ql •}} og of spualxa pue 1!wil .4 817 luaaano s,goeag Aealaa spaaoxa veld pasodoad aql :IgS!aH Z „eas- aqj- Aq- a2ell!A„ e se uo!lelndaa o!aols!q pue pauaea paeq .ano pue anuany o!juela_y jo as }oeaego aqj ql!m jua}slsuoo aq pinogs aleas pue uS!sap agl'1oolp!JS aql Su!IeS!Aeu aw!l alq!ssodwi ue aneq II!m saapuodsai jsal3 •uoseas.ino Su!anp mou joolp!jS le si go!gm'a2pug anuany o!luel }y 941 wo.a} spaeA Ie.aanas saseaaou! aoeds le!oaawwoo pue uo!lelndod }ueo!}!uSis aql }o joedwi agj pa}enlena A!gBnoaoq} IOU seq AI!D aql }ouls!p umolumop ino }o aape.iego le!oads aq} u!elu!ew of lewlldo aq ol paulw.aalap Alsnolnaad goeag Aealad u! siauueld A }!3 jegj Al!suap aql salgnop uegj aaow slgl -(sopuoo oET pue le}uai ZT£) sj!un Ie!juap!saa Ztiti o} panoidde pue paleiioSau Alsnolnaad Wam legl sopuoo L6T aqj wo.aj sl!un lelluap!sa.i }o aagwnu Iejol aq} Suuq pinom aseanu! s!ql •aaoe aad sl!un og to ,9u!uoz oo }ua.i.ino s,goeag Aealaa }o ssaoxa ui ae} s! aaoe .aad sl!un leiluap!saa TOTS jo Al!suap a smolle ueld pasodoad aql :Al!suaa • I :suoseaa Su!mol!o}aq}aol spoogaoggS!au lue.aq!n pue;ue:podw! Isow s,goeag Aealaa jo auo ui aoaawwoo pue aj!l jo Al!lenb aql apejSap Alluauew.iad pue Allueo!}!uSis 11!m ueld pasodoad aq} JegI ana!laq I paeog SuluoZ pue 2uluueld Aq (ZTOZ iagolop) panoadde Alluaoaa sem jeg} II eZeld o!}uelIy jo ueld luawdolanap pasodoad aql ano.idde IOU saauo!ss!wwoo Al!o aqj leq} Isanba.a Allnjioadsai 1 ep!aolA 'gaeag Ae.ilaa }o Alp'saauolss!wwoo Al!:) pue aoAeW aql :ol a }eq � ° l •salepdn an!aoaa 01 aj!l pinom noA j! 'ssaappy l!ew3 ssaippy •uo! }eaauas a u! boa -a.i IsaSiel aqj sjuasaidai legm uo uols!oap A }set{ a ajew pinogs A}!D aqj ana!laq le o!lgnd lew!u!w uaaq seq aaagl •apew uaaq IOU seq pas!Aaa aq pinogs slenoadde.i aweN aqI Aqm aol aseo aq} pue 'sjuap!saa Alp of pajeo!unwwoo -!!am uaaq jou seq ueld pasodoad aql — ssaoo.id lenoaddy Al!:) aqj uo 1oedwi aqj au!waalap of aaijew s!qj uo s!sAleue ao salpnis ou auop seq Aj!D aqj •d!gs.iaumo awoq of luawl!wwoo 2uoals a aa!nbai l!!m juawdolanap s!ql }o uoljeool aa!waid aqj pue a1eos aAlssew aql •saajuaa op uegl saouap!saa of daaildn pue aoueualu!ew aailaq ap!no.id siaumo awoq }eq} leo!dAj s! 11 sj!un paumo- AlaIen!.id uegl aaglej leluai to Al!aofew a JOI sap!Ao.id ueld pasodoad aql :saouap!sa,d jejua21 't ln}ssaoans uanoid seq Su!aaau!2ua s!qi aaagm eppo13 gjnoS u! saldwexa Aue pap!no.id IOU aneq saadolanap aqI aaagm Su!lied puno.iSiapun JOJ sap!no.id osle 11 goea8 Aealaq umolumop }o eaae s141 u! SuPped le!oaawwoo pualaam Aaessaoau pue algea!sap ssa.ippe IOU soop pue Su!wwwooalallo eja ue u! i s!leaaun si uolldwnsse s!q; `spualaam Su!pnlou! Aep Agana xaldwoo aqj moil Aeme aoeld a o; }! saA!ap pue alo!gan auo Aluo seq juap!saa Agana }eqj sawnsse 1eq} s}ua!suea} pue s;uap!sa.i Aq saoeds Buplied jo Buuegs aq} aoj lesodoid a sapnloui ueld s!ql :2uplaed £ •Aep aqI jo Ind aA!Joe Isom agjaol pamopegs pue papegs aq p1nom ga!gm'laed s,ueaaI0A JO asn aqj sas!woidwoo Aljunipu2!s pue juawdolanapaa s!qj }o aleos pue adoos an!ssew aqi saseaaoui aaq;anl uo!ldwaxa s!ql •I} 09 of spuaixa pue 1!w!l -:q St juai ino s,goeag Aealaq spaaaxa ueld pasodoad aql :IgS!aH T 'leas- aq}- Aq- aSell!^» e se uo!je;ndaa a!aoIs!q pue pauaea paeq ano pue anuany o!JuelIV }o aaInJego aqj qj!m jua}s!suoo aq pinogs aleos pue uS!sap aql •1301p!JS aqj Bu!JeS!neu awll alq!ssodwi ue aneq 11!m saapuodsaa jsa13 •uoseas ano Su!anp mou MoopiB le si golgm'aBpug anuany olluelIV aq} woaJ spJeA leaanas saseaaau! coeds le!oaawwoo pue uol;elndod jueoipuB!s aqj jo pedwi aqj pajenlena AlgOnoaoq; jou seq AI!0 aql }a!ais!p umojumop ano }o aa13eaego le!oads aqj u!e;u!ew of lew!ldo aq of paulwaalap Alsno!najd goea8 Aealaq u! s.iauueld Alp 1egj AI!suap aq; salgnop uegj aaow slgl •(sopuoo 0£Z pue le}uai ZT£) sl!un je!juap!saa Ztib 01 panojdde pue pale!loSau Alsno!Aaad aaam IegI sopuoo L6T aqj moil sj!un le!Iuap!saj jo aagwnu jejol aqj Supq pinom aseanu! s!ql -ane aad s}!un OE jo Su!uoz oo juajana s,goeag Aejlaq jo ssaoxa ui ae} si aaae gad s;!un le!juap!saJ TOTS jo Al!suap a smolle ueld pasodoad aql :Al!suaq •j suoseaa Su!mollo} aqj aoj spoogaogg23!au jueaq!A pue jue:podw! Isom s,goeaq Aejlaq 10 auo ul aoaawwoo pue aj!I jo AI!lenb aqj apeiSep AI}uauew.rad pue Allunipugls 1!!m ueld pasodoad aqj Jegj anallaq I •paeog Su!uoZ pue gu!uuEld Aq (ZTOZ aagolop) panoidde Al;uan i sem 1egj 11 ezeld o!luel ;y jo ueld juawdolanap pasodoad aq; anoadde jou snuo!sslwwoo Alp aqj seq} Isanba.i Alinpoadsa.i 1 ep!aol3 'goea8 Aeala(i jo Al!:)'saauo!ss!wwoD A}!D pue aoAm aql :ol To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development Pd ect.in a generation. of Name Address `4L W 1-- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. � � / Y/I� Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name V Y0c7 nC- l 5 � C TA.-)/ (r`.Y A� 3---W-3 Address h //3 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. LIZ AE Name Address I( 0 �\ Y-6 v-PM, t Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- evelopment project in a e eration. Name Address I I - 10. ?6 k L Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. y� Name Address 11iiz Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date City of Delray Beach, Florida development plan of Atlantic Commissioners, Proposed d roposed The Mayor and City rove the P i believe that the P To: commissioners not app and Zoning Board• Beach's most b planning commerce in one of Delray { respectfully request that the city tom of life and roved (October 2012) by recently aPP permanently degrade the q plaza it that was and perman reasons: Ian will significantly per acre is far in excess of Delray P ei hborhoods for the following residential units P number of important and vibrant n g o{ 51.01 the total numb plan allows a density would bring roved to 442 residential The proposed p per acre. This increase negotiated and aPP 1 Density: of 30 units P Previously neg that city Planners in Delray Beach's current cc zoning condos that were P doubles the density town district. the 197 This more than s ecial character of our ow residential units from 130 condos. u{ation and commercial space optimal to maintain the P units (312 rental and fined to be °p act of the significant Pop during our season. previously determ e imp ridlocl< now Beach P roughly evaluated th venue Bridge, which is at g The design and scale should be The City has not thoroug the Atlantic A sting the gridlock. ca tion as a Yards from navigating earned and historic rep increases several y ill have an impossible time our hard responders w of Atlantic Avenue and This First resp limit and extends to 60 ft• consistent with the character 49 ft significantly Beach's current ment and g "village-by-the-sea " elray most active roposed plan exceeds D e and scale of this receve oP for the Height: Thep massive stop and shadowed 2 which would be shaded exemPtion further increases the s park, ,Promises the use of Veteran residents and transients comp o{ parking spaces by from the complex sharing lace away part of the day' Proposal for the drives it to a P uting and does not This plan includes a P only one vehicle and era of telecdow Delray Beach. 3. Parking: resident has town es that every this assumption is unrealistic in this area of downtown in that assumes weekends; commercial parking rovided any every day including weekend ers have not p necessary where the develop owned address desirable and er round parking rivately- ineering has Proven successful. It also Provides for and g majority of rental rather than p where this eng Pro for a keep to residences than do South Florida The proposed plan P aintenance and up wire a strong owners provide better m meet will req 4 Rental Residences' of this develop analysis on this matter to determipe It is typical that home the premier location units. has done no studies or analy The massive scale and The City and the case renters. ownership• residents; a commitment to home unicated to city inimal public City, plan has not been well- com►�"i the impact on the osed p made. There has been the largest re- The prop not been resents e revised has decision on what rep 5 Approval process — approvals should b make a hasty for why the prior app City should m � input and l do not believe the eneration. development project ►nag r' Name Address 7_7 / would like to receive updates. 'Ediail Address, if VOL' Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. N E V-e /V L't,F Name ��N�l `v V L t Address /V Ul/ - `% „ 2 L / Z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Defray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- velopment project in a generation. Name Address . k2, Contact information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- deve opment proje n a generation. 0 Name Address - 7rq 11 1 /it Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date oe ale(] •salepdn aA!aaaa of al!I pinom noA 1! 'ssaJppy I!ew3 ssai ppy aweN f�,��'F 2.� -�z r' -?,Z '� -uo!leaauaS a ui laafoid juawdolanap -aa Isagiel aql sluasaidai legm uo uo!s!aap Alseq a alew pinogs Al!:) aql anallaq Jou op I pue;ndu! a!lgnd Iewlu!w uaaq seq aaagl • @pew uaaq lou seq pas!Aaa aq pinogs slenoadde ao!ad aql Aqm aol asea aql pue :sluap!saa Al!a ol palea!unwwoa -Ilam uaaq ;ou seq ueld pasodoad aql — ssaaoad leno.iddy s AI!0 aql uo;aedw! aq; au!waalap of aal}ew s!ql uo slsAleue ao sa!pnis ou auop seq Al!:) aql •d!gsaaumo awoq of luawl!wwoa Suoa }s a a.i!nba.i ll!m;uawdolanap s!qJ JO uo!leaol aa!waid aq; pue aleas @Alssew aql SJ@Juaj op uegl saauap!saa o} daaldn pue aoueua}u!ew aa}laq ap!AOad s.iaumo awoq legl lea!dAl s! 11 -sl!un paumo- AlaleAl.id uegl aaq ;ea lelua.i to Al!aofew a ao} sap!Ao id ueld pasodoad aql :saauaplsab lelua�l ln}ssaaans uanoad seq SuijaauiSua s!ql aaagm ep!aold glnos u! saldwexa Aue pap!AOad lou aneq siadolanap aq} aaagm gui lied puno.i9aapun ao} sap!Ao id osle 11 gaeas Aealaa umolumop }o eaje s!ql u! Buil ied Ie!aaawwoa pualaam Aaessaaau pue alge.i!sap ssaippe lou saop pue Su!lnwwoaalal jo eaa ue u! a!}slleaaun si uo!ldwnsse slgl :spualaam Sulpnlaul Aep Agana xaldwoo aql wog} Aeme aaeld a 01 J! sanlap pue alalgaA auo Aluo seq juap!saa Agana leq; sawnsse }eq; slua!sue l pue sluap!saa Aq saaeds Sui l.red Io Suuegs aq} aoj Iesodoid a sapnlaui ueld slgl :,9u!laed Aep agljo fed @Algae Isow aql aol pamopegs pue papegs aq pinom ga!gm'JJed s,ueJ@19A Jo asn aql sas!woidwoa Allue:)ipuS!s pue juawdolanapaa sigl jo aleas pue adoas aA!ssew aql saseanui aaq:PnJ uo!ldwaxa slgl •l.} 09 of spualxa pue 1!w!l •:4 St, auaaana s,gaeaq Aejlaa spaaaxa ueld pasodoad aql :14019H •Z leas- aql- Aq- aSell!A„ e se uo!le}nda.i a!ao}s!q pue pauaea paeq ino pue anuany a!JueJJV }o JalaeJega aqJ g ;!m IU@ISIsuoa aq pinogs aleas pue uS!sap aql •ilaolp!JB aqJ Su!JeSlAeu ow!l alq!ssodwi ue aneq p!m saapuodsaa Jsa!d •uoseas ,ino Su!anp mou laolp!ag le s! ga!gm 'agp!ae anuany alJueJJV aql wog} spaeA leaanas saseajaul aaeds le!aaawwoa pue uollelndod luea! }!uR!s aql to laedwi aql palenlena AlgSnoaogl you seq Al!:) aql •Ia!ais!p umo}umop .ino to aalaeaega le!aads aql ulelu!ew of lew!ldo aq of pau!waa}ap Alsno!Aaad g3ea8 Aejla(i u! siauueld Al!a;egl Al!suap aql salgnop uegl aaow s!ql •(sopuoa O£Z pue leluai ZTE) sl!un le!Juap!saa Ztti 01 panoadde pue pale!loRau Alsno!Aaad aaam }eq} sopuoa L6T aq} wog} sl!un Ie!luap!saa jo aagwnu le }o; aql Su!aq pinom aseanu! s!ql •aaae gad sl!un OE to Su!uoz as luanna s,gaeag Aealaa }o ssaaxa ul gel sl aaae gad sl!un le!luap!saa TO-TS 10 Al!suap a smolle ueld pasodoad aql :Al!suaa I :suoseaa Su!mollol aql aol spoogaogqB!au }ueiq!A pue lue),jodw! Isow s,gaeag Aealaa to auo ui aaaawwoa pue aj!l to Al!Ienb aq} apejOap Alluauewaad pue Allunyugls ll!m ueld pasodoad aql JegJ ana!laq I •paeos 5u!uOZ pue guluueld Aq (ZTOZ aagola0) panoadde Alluaaaa sem }eqJ II ezeld a!luelIV to ueld luawdolanap pasodoad aqJ anoidde lou saauo!ss!wwoa AI!a a41 }eqJ Isanbai Alln};aadsaa I ep!jo13 'gaeag Aealaa to Al!:) 's.iauo!ss!wwo' Al!:) pue aoAeVy aql :ol To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name ~6%, tj Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- evelopmen`t` project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date Florida To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Ian of Atlantic rove the proposed development p proposed respectfully request that the city commissioners n Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that t Beach'ps most I rasp roved (October 2012) Y Plaza It that was recently app rode the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray plan will significantly and permanently deg reasons: important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray 1, Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51-01 the total number of Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increasewould bed and approved to 442 residential Be previously g planners in Delray residential units from the con condos ). h shmo more doubles the density a character our downtown district. units (312 rental and 130 condosb optimal to maintain the special Beach previously determined to bee act of the significant population and commercial space hl evaluated the imp gridlock now during our season. The City has not thoroughly e which is at increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, gridlock. The design and scale should be First responders will have an impossible time navigating reputation as a h the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic consistent with This "village -by- the - sea Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to g ficantly plan exceeds Delray mart and significantly 2. Height: Thep ro p osed e and scale of this redevelop exemption further increases the massive scop would be shaded and shadowed for the most active compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which wou part of the day• of Parking spaces by residents and transients ro osal for the sharing P lace away from the complex 3. Parking: This plan includes a p P and does not resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a P that assumes that every tion is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting Beach. every day including weekends; this assume in this area of downtown Delray address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking parking where the developers have not provided any examples m It also provides for P has proven successful. owned rovides for a majority of rental rather than privately - South Florida where this eg plan p to residences than do 4. Rental Residences: Theproposed rovide better maintenance and upkeep units. It is typical that home owners p renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this developm l s s oln this lmatter to determine commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or ana residents; and the case the impact on the City• pro posed plan has not been well- communicated to city public g, Approval Process —Thep P for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There hat epresents1the largest re- input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on develop ment project in a generation. a^ C _ Address Name Date Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Y Beach, Florida To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray rove the proposed development plan of Atlantic 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not app and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most plan wi g important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: ensit : The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray 1. D Y Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would negotiated abed and approved to 442 residential residential units from the 197 condos that were previously g units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special c oa population and commercial al district. P The City has not thoroughly evaluated lant the c Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. increases several yards from the First responders will have an impossible time navigating the earned design and scale historic reputation as a be ue and our hard d earr consistent with the character of Atlantic Aven "village -by- the - sea proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This 2. Height: The p ro p exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of ded and shadowed fordthe most active compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be sha part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by lace saw y fr and transients om the complex that assumes that every resident has only one s vehicle drip s it to oftelecommuting and does not every day including weekends; this assumption address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. add p provided any examples in It also provides for underground parking where oven successful. ddevelopers have not p South Florida where this engineering h p 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rateher t residences -owned to units. It is typical that home owners provide location of this development will require a strong renters. The massive scale and the premier commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well-communicated . There t has been minimal ease 5 pp n mad nimal public for why the prior approvals should be revised has not bee input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Address Name A 3 �v Date Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. `' r r� 4;�Lf_ Air co i�c 1 5c, -�O #`1 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. w (% Name Address /l -ZS- 1 z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and 1 do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- developmen roject in a ge eration. Name Address W 01C (�, a-d L • C vvv", / I -/fJ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: ] . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- dev to ent Dro*ect in a geI tion. T row, Name Address (( —ca -R Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- develppment project in a generation, Name Address L,( ; a - - Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Addres n Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. C fo o o J Date ale(] •salepdn aAlaaaa of aj!l pinom noA j! )ssaappy l!ew3 ssaappy i C/ (V C� l R aweN v, ,uo!leaa a;� a ul laafo.id luawdolanap -ai isagiel aql sluasaidai legm uo uo!s!aap Alseq a ajew pinogs Al!:) aql ana!laq lou op 1 pue indu! a!lgnd Iew!u!w uaaq seq aaagl •apew uaaq lou seq pasha@ aq pinogs slenoadde ao!ad aql Aqm ao} asea aql pue'sluap!saa Al!a of palealunwwoa -Ilam uaaq lou seq ueld pasodoad aql— ssaaoad lenoiddy g Al!:) aql uo laedwi aql au!w.aalap of aallew slgl uo s!sAleue ao sa!pnis ou auop seq Al!:) aql •d!gs.iaumo awoq of luawllwwoa 2uoils a aa!nbaj 1pm luawdolanap s!ql }o uo!leaol aalwaid aql pue aleas an!ssew aql •s.ialua.i op uegl saauap!sai of daaldn pue aaueualulew aallaq ap!noid s.iaumo awoq leyl lea!dAl s! 11 •sl!un paumo- Alalen!ad uegl aaglea Ieluaj jo Aluofew a JOI sap!no.id ueld pasodoad aql :saauap!saa leluaa -In}ssaaans uanoid seq SuijaauiSua s!gl aaagm ep!ao13 gino$ u! saldwexa Aue pap!noid lou aneq siadolanap aql aaagm Su!ilied punoiSiapun ao} sap!AOad osle 11 gaeaq Aealaa umolumop jo eaae s!ql u! Su!laed Ie!aaawwoa puailaam Aaessaaau pue algea!sap ssa.ippe lou saop pue Su!inwwoaalal jo e.ia ue ui a!is!leaaun si uo!idwnsse s!ql :spuailaam Sulpnlau! Aep Agana xaldwoa aq; wog} Aeme aaeld a of l! saAlap pue ala!gan auo Aluo seq luap!saa Agana legl sawnsse legl slua!sueal pue sluap!saa Aq saaeds Suplied }o Su!aegs aql ao} lesodo.id a sapnlaul ueld s!ql :SuIIJed £ -Aep a4110 ped an!lae isow aql aol pamopegs pue papegs aq pinom ga!gm'ilaed s,ueaalaA }o asn aql saslwoadwoa Alluea!j!uS!s pue luawdolanapaa S141 10 aleas pue adoas an!ssew aql saseanui aaglanj uo!idwaxa s!gl -1109 of spualxa pue i!w!I -4 gV lua.i.ina s,gaeaq Aealaa spaaaxa ueld pasodoad aql :igg!aH -Z leas- agl- Aq -@Sel I!A„ e se uo!lelndaa a!aolslq pue pauaea paeq ino pue anuany a!luelly 10 aalae.iega aql ql!m luals!suoa aq pinogs @leas pue uSisap aql •1:)olp!jS aql Su!leOlneu awls alq!ssodwi ue aneg II!m siapuodsai isa! j •uoseas ,ino Bul.anp mou 1:)olp!ag le si ga!gm'aSp!ae anuany a!luelly aql wog j spaeA leaanas saseaaau! aaeds lelaaawwoa pue uo!lelndod luea!puSis aql jo laedwi aql palenlena Alq 'Bnoaogl lou seq Al!:) aql •lauls!p umolumop .ino }o aalaeaega Iepads aql ulelulew of lew!ido aq of pau!waalap Alsno!naad gaeaq Aealaa u! siauueld Alp legl Al!suap aql salgnop uegl aaow s!ql •(sopuoa 0£T pue leluai ZTE) sl!un le!luap!sai Ztti of panoadde pue palellogau Alsno!naad aaam legl sopuoa Chi aql woaj sl!un le!luap!sa.i jo aagwnu lelol aql Bu!aq pinom aseanu! s!ql •ane gad sl!un O£ jo Suluoz as lua.i.ina s,gaeag Aealaa }o ssaaxa ui aej si ane gad sl!un lelluap!saa TOTS jo Al!suap a smolle ueld pasodoad aql :Al!suaa 'i suoseaa 2u!molloj aql aoj spoogaoggS!au lueaq!n pue luepodwi isow s,gaeas Aealaa }o auo u! aaaawwoa pue a }!l }o Al!lenb aql ape.i2ap Alluauewiad pue Alluea! }!uS!s 1pm ueld pasodoad aql legl ana!laq I •paeoe Su!uoZ pue Ou!uueld Aq (ZTOZ aagolaO) pano.idde Alluaaaa sem legl II ezeld a!luelly jo ueld luawdolanap pasodoad agl anoadde lou siauo!sslwwoa Alp aql legl isanba.i All n}i} aadsaa 1 ep!ao13 'gaeae Aealad }o Al!:) 'saauo!ss!wwo:) Al!D pue aoAelN aql :ol To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address GIZb z- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- clE,lopment project in a generation. SEa NC A wo Deb azc Name K -D Address II 00U0201'l2 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. AIE Name `,q `/ /;� % Address / Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ar C., vo,1 3 �qS Name Address I1 I cscw__� lL CC f (--X, Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date I- To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and i do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name a' �✓ iJ/1 ��'i2 f SG it 1 f.y1 JNL /1 /t Si' �� c1� JCjz�.� zr- Fit Address t i -),— Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date �'3y-��k To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in,: generation. ,I/ Name Address // /v Z--- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ELI- Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name r Address / -,T,- " 2 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. 7 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development pr ,j ct in a generation. Name Address � f ,� c�''^��` � S ✓���'(N� �%�tI <'•'?c�;Ji, •�_.�v /1/17,lac1"���.y�Jl�'�w Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan - allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and i do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 1ade %A M, f il� +� D��i —any LJ�� �h, FL 3 3 Name Address 1r /r1�z/a Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza If that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan - allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. l M Cd hl I> {l E—"L L 1� Zy20 /Y -7 L a<5 � D f1� 0, PT 76 `z- E i (Z A `� B E�-ft-C Y� Name Address 4 bMC—L LEkNL e 44 L, 40 M Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date l /—i2 -2072. To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Defray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza Ii that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed forthe most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public put and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- d velopmenyro' i a g erati n. y . v1d rg Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan• allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. pia_ Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- dev ent projedt in a generation. Name /� Address "�—✓�� �y"C� ' Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza it that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project' a generation. Name Address U�', Obe- -C tc_so,L i k-, Uri Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza Il that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Addressg 1-� �t L icy f-. 4.! �t� il...� T ��L.. � J '� :� ._J C .l '-✓ C� --' � .,� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a eneration. f 5E/762 -��% Name Address OT Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date ol To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name I / Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. c,, Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. i believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the duality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: .I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "vif cage -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida i respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. i believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: T . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre_ This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. JG� �=L � CI-7 3�ys Name Address / Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name ����� Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. '4 A, 33 r 3 Date %/ - / io % :Z" To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date i Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal forthe sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. /Ve 7-Ah Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- delel pment project in a Tri ration. Na ( Addres Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. - ) I I f---)- � a:�� Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ��r3 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. 1 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. L Wy < � U 1 \(\) -- D*� Name Address `tea -1 ' TE3� 1 L 3 l(� .-) (2li Email Address, if you would like f re eive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida i respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: `. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residentia units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. t. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately-owned units, it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and i do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name yr Address S/PlY Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida i respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza Il that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: t . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft, limit and extends to 50 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately-owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the Impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ,-- �1- b " �- C-�,i ,- I /ki e��- Z-/--�-� S__ t- - Name FAIR Em Address ress, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Addres ca Lo Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. ' lX Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public LI, do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what repre ents the largest re- Zntr�oje in a generation. t Na Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a g eration. 'I -Z s C) �� � Name Address 6 \ Mno l,1 1 c 16) D OI,co W.Qv�Vkr 10 2- a 2 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 5 O NC �� Name Address C-0 0 � c�J 2-0 1 -2— Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 1/A Address, if you would like to receive updates. l Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- aelopment project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- Na development project in a generation. Address '177G05w "z.L,4JL� L ego Aim-119/171 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. �� S� r Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address //1,-;1Z- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. me ►-L Address // - 1z) - / .�_) Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development pro' ct in a generation. AXL I &_(Ax A I 3 *L/ Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal forthe sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine 5 the impact on the City. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- lopment project in er tion. fie' k -3 Name Address I (It, 112 , Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name �a Address CO , C -c vv i 1 �� --r- . I� f'� �> Ll Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft_ limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Nam Address 6 �o nl tv� 17c rl,� �a cc Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date 11�*a To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development a generation. Name Address J tZ r Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ", 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- d velopment project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date '000� .7 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Corm Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date c j, To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. II �� Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior appr als s ould be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public inwA and I do not b lieve the ity should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- me ent project in a generation. 01zc Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. � 5 ,dcr n-lr Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City shoul a a ty def ion on what represents the largest re- development project in a generatio / v � Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft_ limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. jen n ,-del- N el sa N) i J � 7, ('' 60Jo�- Pa l :3344q Name Address - �_NOLS6`Q C� ivy ) ,�- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. T4, Na7 dress Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Wv- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and l do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. a e G� d C/ `k / _'J ()l � /`t /I) Y- Address /1/13 1 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed forthe most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. LI G c , Ul Q_'c- 3 l L c�, 1� "4--' Address We " A,2,2,2, (�;) -Y� F .,z v -Y_\ t l A3 Z/Q_ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. XA L2 I � Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 933 UUMLIOCW, drk 6- 34�5 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. t, Name �� Address (In C)YJ1 -Y) � � 4 J . _ S ►i 2 V , Email Address, if you would like to recWe updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. se Name .,y M Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date (, To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 13-. Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name AndreIs' I & '41 rL /3Vtf y Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not.provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. AIWF, Cot',FlA/ o t ye. w . La"aGPOrK ctR_ 0Rq Name Address 1/1 3 11 -� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name I Address / / ° /.�; °Z, 2- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date U L' P14'1 V f Vii✓ To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address )(P62� L Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input ,And I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Addres� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date �V 10: file iyic±,.vl C1!_. _._, I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I. Density: The piopoSti. P! U., Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray „ rp ti mal+ nm-A intain the special character of our downtown district. The City his nct"T increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an imnnccihln time na,rirtatintr tho eyridlnr•li The r nrimn and cralc chnlelrl ha -• - •: ?�. -:;c a��en, e and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. "eight: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. H 5�13 9��� Ynt) Name Address aAe.r t 10 OLD) , C-0 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. V 91- Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. rJ %17 Name Address 3 To 3 ►\cx&"�50n ,:�0o�-c vacs n Ccm Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- i lopment project in a generation. Name Address 4JE-_ -ks io-1 j) 13, 201Z— Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development pr project in a generation. f � CA L 1 P. z, S &I Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Address n QD v Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. V� -� 0 -�,_ Date I L � � �( To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. c2 Name Address Ila Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. k:� 9Z3 4:R CSC % � Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date 10 . A. To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 06*4 Name Address Ud 0a Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. a iy y 7 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date 1 01 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name ge)I PAL- M % , �O 01�_ �_ "1 13 3 � e Address / - /�j- 1 Z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address / / 3 A 67/' Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i I a4 %. ►2 (�- rJ �- %tom � c� /�1 i xl �-- � �' � .57 ,5 /J. L• 7 ' Name Address // f zis , -)-- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. / 4 �i4 N K 114,14 R% FCC £�1,(, c- SlS- 1til . FE, ' 4,4 3 y �g 3 Name Address 3 / -.;.— Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date 1 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- e elopment project in a generation. Name Zt / Address //. - a . Z L Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- devel ment project in a gen ation. �', _4� v ��z4skj Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address GJ 94 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development- project in a generation. I 33�b'3 Name V nh c6 tO Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. c� C-1toJ 3 e— � &Loy. ejM t L,en `t JVba,e C�, 2--a/ 7, Date I ;a To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- d elopment project in a generation. P0 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. tl. io - 12 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. r� Name Address 2L J14 1�4- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. TN4 E�aR 4' A. UC �S l,- owl W �`Tf .Sew Name Address ®_ Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. 11 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Address G� �" rte- • 1 I I I e Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation SAN df e f N e e. Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: t. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. e)pd, ch F I,• 33yf3 ao% «m Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date #*/ /7//,-�, To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project ip a generation. Name Address 1 U7/. Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date 03 fl/) To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �L 1 1'R, nAl �e 7 9 b cow S-r Name Address `6 l - Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address �v �1� P4 �G," ?jq 7 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date /0 //4, ✓ J'2-. To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. /J,a /.. , W /,), I � Name Address e N 1-01 13e4t,4 11 33W 3 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date , To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation: __..,- Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza H that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: ]. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Nam Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. wank r%uwc» i rn — SGU (�jl" :22: (a� L�+_� C-g3 ov to i QOJ2 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. bo � -T Name Address /I l � f2 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: %. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Gp Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date t- z To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Contact Information Address _ x,_- Date ,'� im To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day_ 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. r � Name Address Contact Information l Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza If that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day_ 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �1_® % "o IV E /` /Adm PT- 131514 ,36� J�64"�A� Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. / Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: ]. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 1 � Ct �?GV � � If' 1. �i,Q � �rl.u�— �� '� . tU • Z�l ��°' Q�i.7 �. `t�,e l VCu�f L�Cf c�-� Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. .0 Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ,i Name Addres§ _ r, Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. s Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza Il that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 50 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- d lopment project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- a generation. 11 Name 4 (- � 7� Address //' 44 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in ate. ration. f' Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development-project in a generation. � I , C�c Name Address 0 6) Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. _P 334 3 G Name Address H-11- 1)- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. A) cc- ecis f :!, J, Ap t C C I)e V,4 4,1, 3343 Name Address N_���� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name \ Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address U *_8 3 Date Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. C, I /\J ems G \1-*s -.e_4_ l J Name_ Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. J( Iz Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Addres §, if you would like to receive updates. ✓� /z Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. f� Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development pr in a generation. ill-IY461� / � ? (�o Tam Address 1, /z,� �,/16- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 1 -041'A c�) rv0 d ru n ✓? Pr 64c) in Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date 3�a=4_ l/- 8'-1P1 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive u s. 3 0 Y83 Date .7 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 1555 44w �z l0(0 Name Address m Z 0 Ch A . hc4- m Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date 1 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address IT ,' o /,,7_ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in`a generation. �P`' _'Al /Fl AID Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Dat U0Xs wl,'si-ed qu�d4,( ©tL C 3S To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i Name. Address Ile � Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. AA-, Xe I A — Name Address nz(4 l3/< /n Ara ccry Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input �77d I do noFIkIlieve the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- develdoment projea i a generation. Na Address / I /G /j2 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density-. The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4_ Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well-communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 1--f r � (� I' n r) �3 H© (:2t-7 /7 _ Name c] Address Contact Information ,mow eCicti Ft, 3 34 .)e Y , Date / /--_'?- rZ-- To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft_ limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking. This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Contact Information Address �I S - /� / f r Date // s / Z_ To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea" . 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. sf Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of fife and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft_ limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership_ The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- developmeW project in a generation. Name Address /),/) L/ 4__�) 0,// � Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft_ This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking. This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and 1 do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- ctevelopment project in a generation. s� Name 1k1b4,--' OW 6-� C-C41 &tT7 - J tLT Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft_ This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name i� !�;Se Cv-�ke ll Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the -sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and 1 do not b lieve the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. J Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons; I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of BO units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address ��i (- 0)7�3_-0 30D _� Contact Information Date Tn•d I- To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Fidrida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 147 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea'. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process -- The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development pr ct in a genera " Name J� leov UV Contact Information Tn•d Address Date � / -,-2 � /�- To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 147 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. Approval Process --The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Contact Information Address Date 10•d xx3 iaru3svq ax xvstl:so Lo/to/co To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and i do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- de lopment p ject ' p- eneration. f n � Name Address 7 -7(r /1) 2-- Contact Information Tn•d Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters.. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Contact Information Tn•d Address li Z i Z Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 147 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea". 2_ Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Contact Information Tn•d Address Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Fidrida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce In one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process --The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development p in a generation. Name Contact Information Tn d zt,. 7MIK�d /rd�� Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea". 2. height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. La r r Name z Address 3 $ Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recentty approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: l . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This Increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not rev the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development prof ct'rn a generation. Name Address ; 20 rJ Contact Information Date Tn'd To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential ,units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �le oss Name Address Contact Information Date w To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, FHdrida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce In one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant nefghba►fioods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This Increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos), This more than doubles the density that city planners In Delray Reach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards From the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Imposslble time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea", 2. Height: The purposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft, limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan Includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends; this assumption Is unrealistic In an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately-owned units, It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been welkommunicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. r'»��_ Name Address Contact Information Tn'd Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3, Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address r Contact Information Date a To, The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of oelray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density, The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre Is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners In Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridlock, The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputati To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the eity commissloners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (Cktober 2012) by Planning and Zoning Bo$rd. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce In one of Delray Beach's most Important and vilarant neighborhoods for the following reasons. 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre Is far In excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos), This more than doubles the density that city planners In Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, wh ich is at .gridlock now during our season. Flrst responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridiock. The design and Scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Panting: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives It to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic In an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units, It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well-communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised bas not been made. There has been minimal public Input and 140 not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. � _ L f7 \ Z `?� �� �r �I�L` - /� /�)-J//C2 a-C Name ATdnss -� � yT_3 7�C Y L � - - -- �/ _ ^J 1 L j �J L a Contact Information Date rn -Cl %?W q •.r n�� e,-vw e.. ....�. To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons. 1. Density. The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Deiray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 190 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea'. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray reach's current 48 ft, limit and extends to Go ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan Includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives It to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Reach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -awned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the rase for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Contact Information Address Date /701Z T n ' C[ l,v r . -. ..,. -. r.vw ... .... -. . - " . To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Fldrida .. I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre Is far in excess of Delray beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be Optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season, First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridlock. 11he design and stale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village- by.the-sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives ft to a place away from the complex every clay Including weekends, this assumption Is unrealistic In an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the city. S. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. 'there has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name e9`w NZ e ok.c L­.. c= S 4 $.3 Address Contact Information Date TM C1 To, The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. i believe that the proposed Plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray beach's current zoning of 3o units per acre. This Increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and W condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach Previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the Impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and kale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a „village-by-the-sea", 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 6o ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 1 Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives ft to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic In an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences. The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the Impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents: and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been m* ade. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. p Name Address l Contact Information Tn - tj Date To, The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I- I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed devebpment plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed Plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce In one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons. 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre Is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 3o units per acre. This Increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the Impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impassible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should he consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village- by- the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to fib ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives It to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process — The proposer{ plan has not been welt - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Contact Information Address II & M tee_ /'~�`� � �-f4�� hk ,_YW t'L /__ TM -CJ WW I Date Il To, The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Defray 8each, Fldrlda I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed Plan wits significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons. I . Density, The proposed plan allows a density Of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the Impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a „village -by- the -sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Wray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Parts, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives ft to a place away from the complex every day including weekends, this assumption is unrealistic In an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven succeuful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 01 41 Contact Information Date TnICl NOW I To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce In one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density, The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and M condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners In Delray Beach Previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commerdal space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridio& The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village- by- the-sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 46 ft limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives It to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends, this assumption Is unrealistic in an era of teiecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Reach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier lotion of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the Impact on the City. S. Approval process — The proposed pl9n has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the Prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the Clty should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address f4��. - Contact information TA'(I q , �. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida i respectfully request that the city Comm ssionws not approve the proposed devekprnent plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning ward. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and Perrnaneiitly degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the falknit ng reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far In excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acne. This Increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners In Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district, The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significard population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Brvdge, which is at gridlock now duriliff our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock The design and scale should he consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "viiVge- by- theme °. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and finds to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan indudes a proposal for the sharing of parking spares by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives ft to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends, this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has prcmmn successful. 4. Rental Residencm The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitmentto home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysts on this matter to determine the Impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well-communicated to city residents, and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 11 _�74 muc Name Address Conhict 1000 MM Date Tn ' a WWI ­11 ... .., - -- • - - . - - - To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Mrida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed devekpment plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed Plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This Increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and M condos), This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach Previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the Impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea'. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further Increases the massive scrape and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the clay. 3. Paridng: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic In an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysts on this matter to determine the Impact[ on the City. 5. Approval process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty derision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. }n� Name Address Contact information TA'[i Date l/ 7 //z TO' The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida %, i respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed Plan will significantly and Permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce to one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I - Density- The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre Is far in excess of betray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos), This more than doubles the density that city planners In Delray Beach Previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and c ommercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2• Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft, This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active Part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends, this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown betray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples In Soutar Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the Impact on the City. S. approval Process — The proposed plan has not been welt - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Contact Information c-, J\J Address '0, 7 n -a WWI Date ,. To, The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permaner+tty degrade the quality of life and commerce In one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density. The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This Increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and W condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners In Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village- by- the-sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Defray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Paridng: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives It to a place away from the complex every clay Including weekends, this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It Is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 'n Name Address Y- �s Contact Information Date T A -d Iry • To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the duality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i r Name Contact Information rn• -T Address Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 19r`( I Dvilo,,( 9c'.cxoA Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �-c � - Q CIE vec-471n //:5 cic'L� I- Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. XUSL, -L 44,&k �.3 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea" Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project project in a generation. Al/,�, N ame Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. /i �,,V/. V101-20le Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. � ek �a, 434 na) Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address /l /(0&z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed forthe most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. A Name / 0 C— ( e Ael Cc tC Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name ( , 1;, V/1 n a r //,� Address //- /0- /Z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project inI a, generation. Name Address , J��qm(,6,ftz (3 6t(w�� - VJ // - f6 _/�_ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. dd Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date 7ZZ To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 147 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. De�vr r� 23 �tj , Name Address V Ii -a Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project ina generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development probe in a generation. % Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. D to To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ,s . (2.6 c n _ E:vU n NarMe` Address J0 lrl�fS Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- elopment project-,in a generation. Name 'JO-5 epl.-p Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. eL „ ✓t r to Name Address Ij Z 2 Iz Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. _ Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process –The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name ¢� t�! Ntvt- Address I! 13 IZ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- develo ent project in eneration. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public inpu and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- d elo meJroJ ti a generation. Name Address Name, owe -5 /� 9 ( Z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date 7 1 � �% To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. f) J � V Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i Name Address P _ r Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. I Name . Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development,pi'o . Wt in a generation. Name A dress Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Q� Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: i . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. h f r � �LC9 Lf 0 IN i'� _rr V �f Ct S /� ri u �/ 4-V i Name IN Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address LA lo- Email Address, if you ould Yke to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address T Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. P�3 aAd r- - d_(J /_4vc Tme— A" IfT -3 Lcy Name Address T(— f3 -1)-- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. nr VA_nA LEaj &noe eo ame Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development projec eneration. i C Name Address 2)S4�__3 GA. 5T-10-owl, �� 6 ( Q Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input arid I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ` J0* PV)a* Name 01 Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matterto determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- evelopment pr _ ct in a generation. ca -� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date /gp yy To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not lieve the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development proje in a generat' n. 1e Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you wou d like to receive updates. Date �� �� 3 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address [ 2- � ( L�� t YZ_ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generatio Name ` Iddr� Email A ress. if vo wouWex-er Ze&ates. Dafe /// �� To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name (Z.4 t-P Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development projectnaa generation. VA 5r tt Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: I. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space � increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "e:llage_by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases.-the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership', The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development roject in a generation. Name lid Tess kill Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life'and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. 2 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address r / t1J // &,"-- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- dev o, me proj ct in a generatign. L a e Address i-3 - /"X- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date .�� JA To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address _b-_1 vet, Z--._ 11-3,12 Email Address, if you would like to receive updaies_.--/—/'�;1' Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address ) k) 1 1. Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. U Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. N Address l 4 .3 !,-)_� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. L& rtt( Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �--- �{oa -- Name Address / -a it k �6 i LkLk 4� crow _ �vl-i_ f r Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. &an 30 AVE Name Can Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. bolidress Name � Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal forthe sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development pro' erin ge eration. Name Address 11 4-I� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I 101Q not believe the pity should make a hasty decision on what repreWpts the largest re- develop e t projec , in a g eration. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Deaf. Na Address if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. c 4�e i `mow � C :, Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date t1a-J ? , m(9- To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project i a generation. fbil �, 'Name r 'ah tk, 3' �- C�1' /J o L Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- ielopment project in a generation. 1 (ID Na Address a �_ 5� �- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name 1dress lal-7 1'zllaz - Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 147 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �[� 3 l Name Address A) 'T Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. `.3 Z2-' 17--r Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address ill; � L Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make hasty d- cision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name ' Address �J Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. o f� Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. fill Name Vj Address II , Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Nam Address �'` I 6, ve Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. O Name Address ll z z Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village—by—the—sea'. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 07 Name Address Yky Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: ]. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and 1 do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address )i - a- {� Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "vi I lage -by- the -sea" . 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. tA� V" 13 �_ e Name Address LP - -0 — f= Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Nam Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. vk�-J, t~L Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- develop t project in a generation. r Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village - b y -the -sea" . 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a /generation. Name Address �NJWI slnec (__� r/ !l l /2- Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. _ IN ?1d. Name 0 r/�, `73r)r Address Contact Information Date on To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name s-r a I.I J' �Z - A .s � R D 1� -C �Qj: 0 %i 7/1C t,L Address R1 Q4 t 3 - � 1-1 � 313 ivu�,C-Ta ft/ L- ) Ci c, N;\ Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock_ The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- . - / -.. pr in a generation. Aal& Name (,Jzf =A 76 P3JZs- Address /( Y Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address I Ii 1 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- Name pment project in a generation. q Address �� y Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Vl�tcr _ SCE �L�� e04 e-1 Name Address �h�ffaCaJC� c� A4, JOe Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. fon'Yti��' C C Ghr �j� �J�»i, "�1 Name Address I 11 ItLI ll�-� Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. J? mog:� P000y 4 Ll /L _552163 I 1A&)Kiz Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "vi I lage -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i Contact Information '--o ? . 3 / )- 90 Date N0i/ /Z To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a village-by-the-sea'. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- velop en oject 'n a eration. S� E.AST�, Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida i respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea'. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex everyday including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision an what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. SD L09-! r- ;Pz> , fig°; ro q , 4D EKA-17 Y Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era oftelecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- developm nt project in a generation. Address Nam � r Contact Information Tae To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �/e'��k m �— (�.c f l�iJG6� TG-' $'� i. �s i `c;i' •— y.Cj'" /,% / -'L Q r Name Contact Information 5'C /— 1/0, "- > C�, _� Address i C Date 3 —> Yam To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. /% Name ( Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 5 Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. /(0 /-�L r � % F-�� lf� ✓L �L"- f'C. -�• f'l-' dam` Name Address Contact information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: ] . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. AL s 7 -- r 7/ Name Address Contact Information Date i 40iL To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft_ limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and 1 do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i�0 Cl fJc�� 11(64jC&'AJl4 OW Address l '2 7 4 Nb v- � .d2t f ­2 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 49 ft. limit and extends to 50 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- develo ment project in a generation. 1 Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. tA Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. >25k4 ex-C Name Address Contact Information Date 4 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 1 L1 Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft_ limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. {� , :t JCS l �� / i '/U 6.0 f,7 U C_r� Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City shgu#dmake a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development roject in a generation. r Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: ] . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft_ This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 7 t9 - 2�_,,JS 0 Name Address y Contact Information t� 1 2 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. , t -J Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft_ limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. rl _� 111' i H !� lk'_ -3 Name Address Contact Information I� IZ4,11 7 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza If that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock_ The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 50 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 2, / �, / -, Contact Information Date 1 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address l it f� eLtk, 0 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "vi llage -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Contact Information Ad reress Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock_ The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Information Address Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project irl a generation. c� Name Address / Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. JI Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. t (r t LL) Name Address It 1 I iZ Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. I Name Address }p�,�.- ,- ��s�,� Contact Information Date e To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. 1 believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "vi I lage -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza If that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. eUlAA4 ILA" Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- devoe, opment project in ageneration. r Name Address fr ZZ . i,,Z / 2 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Aj Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and 1 do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Contact Information Address ✓� Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Nil Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name � �� �1 Address `) 7 `( r" z; c' S i a1 if —c( 6rr�I Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft_ This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date im To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- /development project in a generation. Name f U 3 Z- CCi Sva //nC, gy L t_I" Px� 3 3`(e 3 Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. � Name Address 6, 373 VY3 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Wproval Pro Tess —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case 1011 for why the riorapprovals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public inputJand I d not�believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largestrre_ Address ti I I �);� / ) -Z�_ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Y l -5 11,Z; Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development pro'ect in a gene atio . Nam Address A4e 7/ 1�DN / Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date )13 i z aced •salepdn anlaaaa 01 ajll pinom noA II 'ssaappy I!ew3 SSaippv aweN uo1 }eaaua� a u! joafoad;uawdolanap (; - aa;sagael ayl swasaada.i legm uo uolslaap Alsey a ajew pinoys Ally a41 anallaq jou op I pue indul al1gnd lewlulw uaaq se4 aaa41 •apew uaaq jou sey pasha@ aq pinoys sleno.idde aoud @41 A4m aoI aseo ayj pue fsivaplsaa A4!:) of paleolunwwoo -Ilam uaaq jou sey ueld pasodoad a41— ssaooad leno.iddy •S •A4!:) a4l uo pedwl a4l aum iaiap of aallew sly; uo slsAleue ao salpnis ou auop sey Ally ay1 •d14saaumo awo4 o; auawl!wwoo Suoals a aalnbaa II!m ivawdolanap s14j Io uoljeaol Jalwaad ayj pue @leas anlssew a 1 •saalua.i op ue4l saouap!saa o; dae ldn pue aoueuawlew aa14aq ap!noad saaumo awoy jegj IeoldAl sl ;I •s4!un paumo- Alalenlad uegj aayjea Ie4uaa Io Al!aofew a aoI sapinoad ueld pasodoad a4l : saauaplsaa Ie}uaa t, •Inlssaoans u@noad sey 2ulaaaulSua s1gi aaaym eplaol j yjnoS ul saldwexa Aue papinoad jou aney saadolanap aqi aaaym Bullied punoiS iapun .aoI sapinoad osle 11 •yoeag Aealaa umo}umop Ia eaae slyi ul Sui lied Ieloaawwoo pualaam Aaessaaau pue algealsap ssaappe lou saop pue Sullnwwooalal Io eaa up ul ogsllea.aun sl uo1}dwnsse s14l fspualaam sulpnloul Aep Anna xaldwoo ayj woil Aeme aoeld a of ;l sanlap pue aplyan auo Aluo sey juap!saa Aaana;egj sawnsse leyl swalsueal pue sivaplsaa Aq saaeds 2lullaed Io gulaeys ayj .aoI Iesodoad a sapnlaul ueld s!41 :Su'AJed •£ •Aep @41 Io lied an14ae Isow a4l aol pamopegs pue papegs aq pinom 4oi4m'laed s,ueaalOA to asn ay; saslwo.idwoa AI}ueollluSls pue }uawdolanapaa S141 JO @leas pue adoas anlssew a44 saseaaaul aa4lanl uolldwaxa 5141 • }I og of spua4xa pue ;!w11 -:l gti;uaaano s,4aeag Aealap spaaoxa ueld pasodoad a41 :44219H •Z „eas -a 4;- Aq -@2el I!n„ e se uollelndaa olaols14 pue pauaea pae4 ano pue anuany alluelly Io aa}oeaeyo a41 ql!m lualslsuoo aq pinoys aleos pue uglsap a41 •j:)olp!as a4, 2ul }eBIneu awll alq!ssodwl ue aney II!m saapuodsaa lsal j •uoseas ano Sulanp mou joolp!iS le sl ya14m'@Sp!jg anuany oljuejjV @qj woal spaeA Ieaanas saseaaaul aaeds Ielaaawwoo pue uoljelndod jueoipuSIs aqj Io joedwl a4l palenlena Al4Bnoaogl jou se4 Al!:) ay1 gala ;slp umoiumop ano Io aaloeaeya lelaads aql ulelulew of lewildo aq o4 poulwialap AlsnOlAaad gae@iI AealaQ ul saauueld Allo;e44 Al!suap ayl salgnop uegj aaow s!41 •(sopuoa o£Z pue Iejuaa ZT£) shun Ielluap!saa Ztiti o; panoadde pue palellogau Alsnolnaad aaam jeyl sopuoo L6T aqi woal s;lun Iequap!saa Io aagwnu Iejol ayj Bulaq p1nom aseaaaul s!41 •aaoe aad sl!un o£ Io Suluoz ao luaaano s,4aea8 Aealap Io ssaoxa ui aeI sl aaoe aad s4lun leguaplsaa To-is Io Al!suap a smolle ueld pasodoad a41 :A3lsuad I :suoseaa Sulmollol @qj aoI spooyaogygl@u lueaq!n pue 4ue4aodwl lsow s,4aeaq Aealaa to auo uj aoaawwoa pue al!I to Aj!jenb a4l apeagap Alluauewaad pue Aljue:)U!u2ls Ipm ueld pasodoad ayj le4l anallaq I paeo8 SuluoZ pue guluueld Aq (ZTOZ sago }op) panoadde Alluaoaa sem legl II ezeld oljuel }y Io ueld juawdolanap pasodoad ayl anoadde jou saauolsslwwoo A4!o aqi iegl lsanbaa Allnl4oadsaa I eppol j '4oea8 AealaQ Io Al!:) 'saauolsslwwo:) Aq1D pue aoAeVM ayl :ol To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Dat To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. arIZ�ad` :C -D-e r i' & c(i) (= / 2_0 L4 - T\/ " Name Address ,S-3 l� . l Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. VCV(I i Q MM-�,22-,g y Name VaYYQ "1. U61 NVV 11A Ei- Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date i To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. M Name �) alyolt (� 6 DG) Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners qi approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. � aoo o-�� S�� .J�J �w -d+-► Name ) 4 _ Gt rc. t r_-�'- t i To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Am Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Llie, m i Doo %� -�-� -— Name Address /1 z 1 Y Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioner no pprove the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012 y Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �- Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 16 if �n ) ))q �,, � Name Address ► +�3 is Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- dev ent roject in a generation. Name Address I � I 's J- -6 t-2 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name 14 x��� r Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. I , I / / 0 Date _.�l y To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ) 0 � t, 2 -,) � Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior i in t and I do not f dev lopment Name Is should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public the City should ake a hasty decision noont�what reprWnts the largest re- �en ration. Address 3 J� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- deve . ment ?ject"a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date 6 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public li put and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- evelopment project in a generation. Name Address C'cvy--\ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal forthe sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generatio . Name A dre ��� � ✓ 4 . Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date MI To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development roject in a generation. Name Address I _ C_o y� I if 7WJ r �y- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners o approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) y Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioner not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012 y Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approve o 442 residential 0 units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city plann Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space 40 increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be � 20 consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- devel me project in a generation. Name Address IVoV 2,2�rZ- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners to �pprove the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- evelopment project in a generation. Nam Address i /S Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. d r Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissionernot)approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 20120y Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proms for why the prior approy'd (s sf innu and I do not beli ve the 44elopmelfit project i tea, has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case �e revised has not been made. There has been minimal public should make a hasty decision on what reor6ts the IaWst re- FA Address // /7 ^ /� 2 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Del Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioner not pprove the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza If that was recently approved (October 201 b Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process –The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. LC N 5 A c H S Name too lo(��P. Address ``— ` S-I- A y 3 C AC A10 V,2, 20 /-2� Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. tic) Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- develo ment project in a generation. � 3 � Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. D�1,e ^,0JAJ C i ✓� r Name Address 41^6 0 �_ 62 yt� r � -51 JW\ l'),_&O" - 1,*2 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 'o`zx-ay, /5Z--4C-/-J Fe Vr7vvs, Name Address i )- 6 - i 4 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "vil Iage -by- the -sea" 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 50 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Ycl,�--d( l' C-7 I ( _530_3 Name Address 7 i 5 ( -703 -331 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- d velopment project in a generation. U c w L 1/� C- ��c4 Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- developm nt project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development pro'ect in a gener i 'on. Name tr( Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1:. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic In an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. L1 P ✓) J L✓ Gt l/1 _ T z l� i �c �l cc .' l/ "� L� Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza iI that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 4 . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre Is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residentia' units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos ). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea'. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name T Contact Information Address l� Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address X33 _/1 7 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name - , �- �/�7- L') 6 (/,-,(" Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- developme,rtLproject in a generation. Name Address (LI < 0 t-1J+ N* iJ f I L DIY Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does n ot, address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Ll _A C/ Date / To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date — To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: ]. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i "a° f. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date Rn To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza li that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process— The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in ajgeneration. Jf% i Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza If that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name I vet 3 -3 Address 1(a(,c),6 < Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida i respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will signif candy and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . tensity: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This Increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos), This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be Optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the Impact of the significant population and commercial space Increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea'. 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan indudes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day Including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples In South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysts on this matter to determine the Impact on the City. S. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest ce- de ent ect in a generation. Name �OA- 5 am vo-rc c Contact information '� ( P )d AWL i� t 0 JW� 1-2, Date rn.a %,v, ,�,.- .�.... ,.. To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida .. I respectfully request that the cfty commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significan0y and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most Important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre Is far in excess of Delray Beach's current Zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and W condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach Previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has rot thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an Impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea'. 2. height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 6o ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every residerrt has only one vehicle and drives It to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption Is unreattstic In an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples In South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -awned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysts on this matter to determine the impact on the city. S. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public Input and 1 do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. I Name L-3— A 7> Contact Information Date Tn'C1 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this mater to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. iZ Ca < 3 f o L. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida pment plan of Atlantic I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the ing Board. lol believe that the proposed Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zon plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard eamed and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. VL Name Contact Information Address Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do no lieve the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development p jec in a generation. 1 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address sal -Y Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a neration. Name Address /4/ Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- evelopllment project iiinn{-�apgeneration. �.5 /-/7 VY' �l.,t- ��) ✓'J ' Sr Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Add re / `� tit" �"�' ��`r � -2 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 1 � Name Address AA i c ,: �) d 7 /Gal- s-3 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza it that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters_ The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 61-60 -7 SO X57 ,��b , 41197— 93 &'4743 Name Address 0 Sq 1-12 S-4-7 CA) 5 c�671- COO Contact Information Date 03!26/2007 23:41 50875245599 PAGE 01101 To. 586752 -4559 from; mien 0, 5alnek Tot The Mayor and City Cornmissioners Oty of Delray Bach, Florida P9 11 1 11/01/12 3:53 pt, I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the propo+ied development plan { F Atlantis; Plaza 11 that was recently pproved (Oci:ober 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I belleve that :he proposed plan will significantly and permanently ilegrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delra Beach's most Important and vibrant neii bborhoods iiDr the following reasons. 1, Density; The proF ased plan alh)wrs a density of 50.01 residential -units per acne is far in ,. tcess oi,- moray Beach's currentzoningof 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number f residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and a pproved to 442 reside dal units ,(312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that .1ty planners in Delray {each previously determined to be o-11mal to maintain the special character of our downtown district 'The City has not thorn ughly walua lied the Impact of the significant P;spulation and commer lal space increases several rands from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which Iv at gridlock now durini our season, First responders veld have an irnposssible time navigatingthe gri&ock. The design and sc le should be consistent with 0 a character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard es coed and historic repu Itlon as a "village -by- the -sea" 2. Height: The prop used plan ex needs Delray Beach's current 48 ft limit and extends to Gi ft This exemption further Increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and slE, dflcantly compromises the use of Veteum's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the cost acdve part of the day, 3. Parking: This plain includes a proposal for the sharing of parking ispacest by residents an transients that assumes thv: every resido,nt has only one vehicle and drives It to a place away fror the complex every day including weekends; this assumption Is unrealistic In a era of telecommutin,. and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downt iar Delray Beach, it also provides fear underground parking where the developers have not provlded any i samples in South Florida wh(tre this engir eering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The prop ned plan provides for a majority of rental rather than prim telyowned units. It Is typical that home * unem provide better maintenance! and upkeep to resider ;es than do renters, The massive scale anal the premier location of this deveilopment will require a trong commitment to h ame ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this mat sr to detarmine the impact on the. City. 5. Approval Process —The propa;ied plan has not been well - communicated to city resider s; and this case for why the prior approvals sh ould be revised has not been madie. There has been min cal pub1N Input and I do not believe the Gty should make a hasty decision on what represents th, largest n-- developmen jest In a gerurration. e �r! Address 9 r Contact Information note To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza li that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the,character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. J - 50 f4ew SZOOA> , TJ �.rc vy ?a c4 i 3154'5!5 Name Address Noy Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. / Name ti Address Z11 ' , /// l) Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a' majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- de lopment project in a generation. Name Addre' ss1 f Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard eamed and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. i. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Contact Information Gam/` /��'�� Address Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: L. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- developm t proje in me Contact Information ON Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �«�� ✓� �. 1.,���Q 112 �as�i~� � �3��3 Name Address I I -Zr to iZ_ Contact Information _� - Z-1 I —:s x Z Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01- residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. LI NamCe� / Address Cl Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: L Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. yc Name Address it /.a 1/Z. Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process -The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address �i 3 ld- Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft, limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. S. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- develop ent project in a generation. 2. Name Address �� � - Contact Information Date 3 37 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft, limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. it also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development 1project n a generatj n• e j4j�, Name re 1 `l Date Contact Information To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed ,plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Date Contact Information To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. P Name Address Contact Information�1 L i� C V� —L Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "vi l l age -by -th e- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 65w s+ Name Address Date Contact Information To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a °village-by-the-sea" . 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input a I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- d ev o ent project in a eneration. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. N Information Address Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the and Zoning Board. l believe that the p otposed Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by g plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only'one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- develpment project in a generation. f Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida rove the proposed development plan of Atlantic I respectfully request that the city commissioners not, app nnin and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by g plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 lwouldlbrfng tper total number of excess esidenDtialay Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating r hard gridlock. rned and design historic reputation as should a be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue "village-by-the-sea". Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe th y should m e a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a ene tion. N �rw e Contact Information N Ad V Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida rove the proposed development plan of Atlantic I respectfully request that the city commissioners not app nnin and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by g plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of SO.Oreaselwouldlbring tphertotal number of excess esidenDtialay Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This in roved to 442 residential units (312 units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain of the significant population and commercial sspaceThe City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard eamed and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients icle and drives it to a place away from the complex that assumes that every resident has only one veh every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a gene tion. Name Address Date Contact Information To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida 1 respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ti Name Address f j tt� l� Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve in the and Zoning development plan of believe that the Atlantic p oposed Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by g plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine 5 the impact on the City. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project i a generation. cm 33 Name Contact Information Address I i -3 I I _v Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida antic I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the ong Board. believe that t e Ip oposed Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning nd Zon plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This sive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly exemption further increases the mas compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients s only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex that assumes that every resident ha every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not cial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. address desirable and necessary weekend commer It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- develop ent project in a generation. Name Address 5 2W Z Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 147 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. it is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza It that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. C / / L .50 Ea 1 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the - sea ", 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposa; for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. \0) -C )l Lviy�A_�3 Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date U� To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida an ic I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the development believe that the ip otposed Plaza h that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning nd Zo plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.Olwouldlbring tphertotal number of eesidenDtealay Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This inc rease roved to 442 residential units (312 units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and app rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters, The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine 5. the impact on the City. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- Contact Information &GIA Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the ng Boa d.lol believe that thetp oposed pment plan of Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zon plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address �LLI � ��i � /- �TC��T7,✓ i�u� /l l Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input an #)l do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- develo e t p 'ect in a generation. i S0, Cy /ems Ci,G% Z Name Address / 33 ,�Iyy .S7 / - _� 72 - 3� -z X110 -a-, Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "vi I lage -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address � -7�/ - 777 7 Contact Information Date a To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information a-6%` t -:5 %°)- 0 S-6 /- °)-,7 (C ` 7�"�? �Z- Date (v To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address 0 A 1 2_0 12 - Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i Name Address U - a Contact Information Wnr, l / Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address ,_2 -7 2 Contact Information Date im To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. V Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I . Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,'village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address /f 11,2-- Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. _ Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: I. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day_ 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process – The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- developmen ro. ct in a generation. Name Address %/— / — /C9 Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by -the- sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i A, _ fI Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a gen ration. ✓ ��`' Name Address Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5, Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. iA0`T�E E ✓E (V O a A 0R� P;�"r 5A:_�e4. �EAC -H 33 4$3 Name Address �6 a 11 12, Contact Information Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. '31cl Alf, 4+ Ic Name Address 55 �oe: b i?, se : ^2C Al t f / /.- /3- / Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: t. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. i� �? a l^r'1 �Ta, r, r `3�t$ 3 Name Address >`'I�i1 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Jo / 1N /_-, %�,� =�L L 111-140 Name Address JnC kl/-1 33445W&L , L'oM Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza 11 that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. ► believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address �0 I C2 -�`I C tee: C' ,�� �Z Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address I. 117�i Email Address, if you would like to receive updates Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "vi l l age -by- the -sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive / / dates. Date , 3144X Email To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a .village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- eve opment project in a generation. pia Nr � Air �C��/ 3J yy� Na Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental ratherthan privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date Delray Beach City Commissioners and Mayor McDuffie — Please be advised that I am totally in favor of the redevelopment of the Atlantic Plaza property. Unfortunately, the current Plan for this development is way too dense and way too Residential for what our CBD needs now and in the future. As you know, the need for First Class office space in the CBD is critical, especially now that Delray Beach has evolved into the "Live Work Play... Delray" City that we have all worked so hard to achieve. 442 apartments — most of them studio and one bedroom units — are far too many for that pivotal, high- traffic location. Also, as I'm sure you've heard, many of the surrounding Residents in beautiful single - family neighborhoods fear these small apartments will only add to and make worse our City's transient housing issues. They have a point for us all to consider. The number of parking spaces is an additional concern since parking is already scarce in this area of the downtown and, with the density of this project as proposed, the parking problem will only be made far worse in this area. Access — both ingress and egress, especially for delivery trucks — is also a major concern since this proposed project is so close to two first -class residential neighborhoods AND a bridge to the barrier island and such vehicles could easily intrude on those neighborhoods if not properly managed. In addition, Federal Highway is proposed to be narrowed to two lanes and no deceleration lanes are shown /provided on the Plan for ingress and egress to the property from this major travel /traffic artery. This combination of a narrowed highway and no deceleration lanes will cause major gridlock in this pivotal downtown intersection and all around it. I realize that construction money to build new projects is scarce right now and that money for apartments is one of the few sources available. However this is NO REASON to endorse /approve a less- than -ideal Plan for one of the most visible, heavily - traveled intersection in our CBD. Also, over 2300 apartments are already coming out of the ground within a two -mile radius of this intersection — yet very little new office space, which is the real property commodity in most demand in our CBD. understand that, as City Leaders, you want new development in our City — that fact is fully understood. But PLEASE DO NOT APPROVE THIS PLAN AS IT IS NOW. Our Wonderful City deserve better. Our business community — and community leaders - should not settle for less than the Best and we should work with the Developer to get it. Please be advised that I contacted the Developer to discuss these items yesterday, but we have not yet been able to get together to talk about these and other issues concerning this important property. Please hold out for a better plan — please don't approve this one. Christina W orrison, QP.A., CTW Commercial Real Property Consultant Phone: 561.573.7083 Christina Delray @gmail.com Service eZ Etierience 914ake ffThe Difference... To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 50.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well - communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. H�'E. S>;ANNE �S► �. VeN� �'O 1r ASr'RQA"� . �i S �? =�G r =R�4y' ��►A GH t����R 334$ 3 Nge ,7 (Address Contact Information 1 Date I jr O 1 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods forthe following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the -sea" Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to homeownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development projgct in a generation. Name Address errs& V_(/ ,­,e f- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date ,13 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. V \ o 1V "�^ tT' J+O yt1 L Name Address � I I � I lolo, .kk I Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. it `t f Name Address C Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. 4 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Address V k-11 Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. 1 �Gr Name Address Cow Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. 3 Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ASS I C c�, )% W kc-Q _ Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. \ r Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. LAk4 Name Address Tt t'i Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a ,village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior appr als should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public inpu'band I do not lie a the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development pro' ct ' a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. "a« To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. LcVdf�--, Name Iry r;, wi,�,asf, ytef Address //-,3-/2- Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process — The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. Address -( Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- evelopment project' a generati Name Address //, - -3 - � 7__ Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village-by-the-sea". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. �e-e A r i Name Address Email Address, if you would like to receive updates. Date RALF BROOKES ATTORNEY Board Certified in City County and Local Government Law City of Delray Beach Re: Atlantic Plaza II - Public Hearing November 13, 2012 Dear City of Delray Beach: I represent numerous adjoining and nearby property owners to the proposed project including John Papaloizos at 50 East Rd.8H, Delray Beach Fl. 33483 who will be affected by the increase in traffic, insufficient parking, incompatible uses, density, mass, scale, height of proposed buildings. My clients object to the request to: • exceed a height of 48 feet (59' 4" proposed); • increase the residential density of the project from 30A dwelling units per acre to 5 1. 10 proposed dwelling units per acre for total of 442 proposed dwelling units; and • traffic, parking and transportation impact of vehicles on the residential neighborhood Please consider our objections to Atlantic Plaza II because the project as proposed is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not in compliance with Ci Land Development Code including Section 2.4.5(E)(5): (5) Findings: In addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the City Commission mus make findings that establishing the conditional use will not: (a) Have a significantly detrimental effect upon the stability of the neighborhood within which it will be located. Section 4.3.4(J)(4)(b)(iv)(3) "That open areas, such as courtyards, plazas, and landscaped setbacks, be provided in order to add interest and provide relief from the building mass." Section 4.4.13(I) Central Business (CBD) District: (A) Purpose and Intent: The Central Business District (CBD) Zone District is established in order to preserve and protect the cultural and historic aspects Policy C -3.2: "Downtown Delray Beach Master Plan represents the citizen's vision for the growth and unification of Delray Beach, while still retaining the uzllage like community by- the -sea character of the CBD ... Future development in this area shall be consistent wi the Master Plan." Transportation Element Objective A -2: "The traffic circulation system, and improvements thereto, shall be coordinated with new development as depicted on the Future Land Use Map in order ... provide for adequate and safe access ..." Transportation Element Goal "B" : "The maintenance and enhancement of the city's existing quality of life shall be complimented by a convenient, safe and efficient street system which maintains an optimal level of service. The system shall keep the local trafficways of Delray Beach uncon ested, thus retaining one of the unique attributes of the Delray Beach quality of life and providing an environment which is safe for the diversity of travel habits which are exhibited by Delray Beach residents." Transportation Element Goal "C" : "A convenient, safe and efficient transportation network which emphasizes safety and which meets the needs of residents, both year -round and seasonal, shall be created. Its focus shall be upon aiding congestion and accommodating all forms of travel throughout the city." Downtown Master Plan: "Preserve the Character of the City: The City of Delray Beach is a good place to live, shop, work, and relax. It possesses small town attributes, great physical structure and charm. It is important to preserve these qualities... "Introduction, page 1 "Encourage development without displacement at an ap ro riate scale: Encourage development fronting long Atlantic Avenue, with t ree stories as ideal height and four stories being the maximum desired height." Intro uction, page 1 Goal and Objective - "To create building forms of a character and scale that reinforces the Citizens' vision of a 'City of urban amenities with a small town feeling.'" Project (Master Plan) Goal and Objectives, (Page Citizen Testimony: Citizen testimony regarding compatibility is permissible and constitutes substantial competent evidence, so long as it is fact - based. Mere generalized statements of opposition are to be disregarded, but fact -based neighborhood testimony regarding compatibility is competent substantial of downtown Delray Beach and simultaneously provide for the stimulation and enhancement of the vitality and economic growth of this special area. Central Core: The regulations are intended to result in development that preserves the downtown's historic moderate =ale , while promoting a balanced mix o uses that will help the area evolve into a traditional, self - sufficient downtown. Section 3.2.3 (D) : "The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. if it its determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted." Section 3.2.3 (E) "Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless ofzoning designations." Section 3.2.3 (I)(1) : "Performance Standards These standards shall apply to all applications for new development and modification of existing developments which would result in a density greater than thirty (30) dwelling units per acre in the Commercial Core.... (1) ... Notwithstanding the above, the approving body may deny an application for increased density where it is determined that the proposed project is no compatible in terms of building mass and intensity of use with surroundin development." g Comprehensive Plan Future Land use Element, Objective C -3 "The Central Business District (CBD) and surrounding neighborhoods including A -1 -A, Seacrest and Swinton Avenue represents the essence of what is y Delra Beach i.e. a "village by the sea ". The continued revitalization of the CBD is essential to achieving the overall theme of the City's Comprehensive Plan by managing growth and preserving the charm. The following policies and activities shall be pursued in the achievement of this objective" evidence. Metropolitan Dade County v. Blumenthal 675 S.2d 598 (Fla. Dist. App. 3d 1996). Conclusion: The "approving body may deny an application for increased density where it is determined that the proposed project is not compatible in terms of building mass and intensity of use with surrounding development" under Section 3.2.3 (I)(1) of the Land Development Regulations, and must deny a conditional use that will have "a significantly detrimental effect upon the stability of the neighborhood" under Section 2.4.5(E)(5)(Conditional Use). Please make a motion to DENY the proposed Conditional Use as set forth in the staff report, Alternative Action "C ". Staff Report page 3. Sincerely Ralf Brookes Attorney Ralf Brookes Attorney Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law by The Florida Bar 1217 E Cape Coral Parkway #107 Cape Coral Florida 33904 To: The Mayor and City Commissioners, City of Delray Beach, Florida I respectfully request that the city commissioners not approve the proposed development plan of Atlantic Plaza II that was recently approved (October 2012) by Planning and Zoning Board. I believe that the proposed plan will significantly and permanently degrade the quality of life and commerce in one of Delray Beach's most important and vibrant neighborhoods for the following reasons: 1. Density: The proposed plan allows a density of 51.01 residential units per acre is far in excess of Delray Beach's current cc zoning of 30 units per acre. This increase would bring the total number of residential units from the 197 condos that were previously negotiated and approved to 442 residential units (312 rental and 130 condos). This more than doubles the density that city planners in Delray Beach previously determined to be optimal to maintain the special character of our downtown district. The City has not thoroughly evaluated the impact of the significant population and commercial space increases several yards from the Atlantic Avenue Bridge, which is at gridlock now during our season. First responders will have an impossible time navigating the gridlock. The design and scale should be consistent with the character of Atlantic Avenue and our hard earned and historic reputation as a "village -by- the - sea ". 2. Height: The proposed plan exceeds Delray Beach's current 48 ft. limit and extends to 60 ft. This exemption further increases the massive scope and scale of this redevelopment and significantly compromises the use of Veteran's Park, which would be shaded and shadowed for the most active part of the day. 3. Parking: This plan includes a proposal for the sharing of parking spaces by residents and transients that assumes that every resident has only one vehicle and drives it to a place away from the complex every day including weekends; this assumption is unrealistic in an era of telecommuting and does not address desirable and necessary weekend commercial parking in this area of downtown Delray Beach. It also provides for underground parking where the developers have not provided any examples in South Florida where this engineering has proven successful. 4. Rental Residences: The proposed plan provides for a majority of rental rather than privately -owned units. It is typical that home owners provide better maintenance and upkeep to residences than do renters. The massive scale and the premier location of this development will require a strong commitment to home ownership. The City has done no studies or analysis on this matter to determine the impact on the City. 5. Approval Process —The proposed plan has not been well- communicated to city residents; and the case for why the prior approvals should be revised has not been made. There has been minimal public input and I do not believe the City should make a hasty decision on what represents the largest re- development project in a generation. ) CITY of DELRAY BEACH ATLANTIC PLAZA 11 4` PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 900NW1STAVENUE ,DEMYBEACH,FLOMDA33444 NORTH LOCATION MAP