01-17-95 Regular
. DELRA Y BEACH
, 1 0 . IDA
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA - CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING ~
JANUARY 17. 1995 - 6: 00 P.M. /PUBLIC HEARING 7: 00 P.M. , 1111 '
COMMISSION CHAMBERS
The City will furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where
necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity
to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or acti-
vity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243 -7127
(voice) or 243-7199 (TDD) , 24 hours prior to the program or activity in
order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive
listening devices available for meetings in the Commission Chamber.
RULES FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
1. PUBLIC COMMENT: The public is encouraged to offer comments with the
order of presentation being as follows: City Staff, public comments,
Commission discussion and official action. City Commission meetings are
business meetings and the right to limit discussion rests with the
Commission. Generally, remarks by an individual will be limited to three
minutes or less, (10 minutes for group presentations). The Mayor or
presiding officer has discretion to adjust the amount of time allocated.
A. Public Hearings: Any citizen is entitled to speak on items
under this section.
B. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items from the Public: Any
citizen is entitled to be heard concerning any matter within the
scope of jurisdiction of the Commission under this section. The
Commission may withhold comment or direct the City Manager to take
action on requests or comments.
C. Regular Agenda and First Reading Items: When extraordinary
circumstances or reasons exist and at the discretion of' the
Commission, citizens may speak on any official agenda item under
these sections.
2. SIGN IN SHEET: Prior to the start of the Commission Meeting,
individuals wishing to address public hearing or non-agendaed items
should sign in on the sheet located on the right side of the dais. If
you are not able to do so prior to the start of the meeting, you may
still address the Commission on an appropriate item. The primary purpose
of the sign-in sheet is to assist staff with record keeping. Therefore,
when you come up to the podium to speak, please complete the sign-in
sheet if you have not already done so.
3. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION: At the appropriate time, please step up
to the podium and state your name and address for the record. All
comments must be addressed to the Commission as a body and not to
individuals. Any person making impertinent or slanderous remarks or who
becomes boisterous while addressing the Commission shall be barred by the
presiding officer from speaking further to the Commission unless
permission to continue or again address the Commission is granted by
majority vote of the Commission member present.
APPELLATE PROCEDURES
please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by
the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting
or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for
this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal is to be based. The City will neither provide nor
prepare such record.
AGENDA
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation.
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. Agenda Approval.
Action: Motion to Approve.
s. Approval of Minutes:
Regular Meeting of January 3, 1995
6. Proclamations:
A. Delray Beach's Centennial - 1995
7. Presentations:
A. Fourth Annual Holiday Toy Drive Committee - Perry DonFrancisco
and Officer Jeff Miller - Presentation to Parks and Recreation
After School Program
8. Consent Agenda: City Manager recommends approval.
A. RESOLUTION NO. 3-95/ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF S.E. 4TH
STREET: Approve Resolution No. 3-95 abandoning a portion of
S.E. 4th Street, lying between S.E. 7th Avenue and the
Intracoastal Waterway, based upon positive findings pursuant to
LDR Section 2.4.6{O) (5).
B. ACCEPTANCE OF UTILITY EASEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH S.E. 4TH STREET
ABANDONMENT: Accept a 15 ft. utility easement to cover
existing facilities within the S.E. 4th Street right-of-way to
be abandoned under Resolution No. 3-95.
C. ACCEPTANCE OF COUNTY DEED CONVEYING THE CATHERINE STRONG CENTER
PROPERTY: Accept deed from Palm Beach County conveying to the
City of Delray Beach the Catherine Strong Center property.
D. FINAL PAYMENT/J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION CO. . INC. : Approve final
payment in the amount of $1,980.00 to J.J.R. Construction Co.,
Inc. for demolition of the master lift station and restroom at
-2-
Veterans Park. Funding is available from Water & Sewer Renewal
and Replacement - Veterans Park Phase II (Account No. 442-5178-
536-61.63) .
E. CONTRACT ADDITION (CHANGE ORDER NO. 8)/MOLLOY BROTHERS. INC. :
Approve a contract addition (Change Order No. 8) with Molloy
Brothers, Inc. on the Street Reconstruction and Utility
Improvements (Northwest, Northeast) project to include
modification to the Lake Ida drainage outfall on N.W. 13th
Street and drainage for N.W. 17th Street. The change is for a
twenty-one (21 ) day extension of the contract; the net amount
of the contract addition is $0.00.
F. RATIFICATION OF APPROVAL/AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS UNDER
"DELRAY BEACH RENAISSANCE" : Ratify the January 10, 1995,
consensus to approve and endorse the coordinated delivery of
affordable housing to low and moderate income households as
proposed under the "Delray Beach Renaissance" program and
authorize the joint submission of competitive grant applica-
tions to leverage program dollars.
G. RATIFICATION OF APPROVAL/DUNE REVEGETATION PROGRAM: Ratify the
January 10, 1995, consensus to approve the plan and program to
revegetate the west side of the dune among the municipal beach.
H. RATIFICATION OF APPROVAL/"ADOPT-A-HIGHWAY" PROGRAM: Ratify the
January 10, 1995, consensus to approve a City-sponsored
"Adopt-A-Highway" Program.
I. POLICE AND FIRE COMMUNICATIONS AGREEMENT WITH TOWN OF
GULFSTREAM: Approve a revised agreement between the City and
the Town of Gulfstream for dispatching and communications
services.
J. RESOLUTION NO. 4-95: Approve Resolution No. 4-95 requesting
Florida Department of Transportation to designate two pa.rking
spaces on the south side of Atlantic Avenue (State Road 806),
just east of Salina Avenue, as a loading zone from 8:00 a.m. to
1:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday.
K. AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS:
1. Bid Award - to Networks, for the purchase of two
Uninterruptable Power Source (UPS) units for the gas
chromatograph and atomic absorption test equipment at the
Water Treatment Plan Laboratory. Funding in the amount of
$10,548 in available from Renewal and Replacement -
Computer Equipment (Account No. 442-5178-536-64.11) .
9. Regular Agenda:
A. REVIEW OF APPEALABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT BOARD ACTIONS: Consider
accepting the actions and decisions made by the Planning and
Zoning Board, Site Plan Review and Appearance Board and the
Historic Preservation Board during the period January 2 to
January 13, 1995.
-3-
B. APPEAL OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ACTION: Consider an
appeal of the Historic Preservation Board's denial of a
Certificate of Appropriateness to allow a free standing sign to
be constructed at Villa Delray, 127 S.E. 7th Avenue, in the
Marina Historic District.
C. REVISED STORMWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM:
Consider approval of the revised Stormwater Utility Capital
Improvement Program which increases the proposed expenditures
in FY 94/95 by approximately $1,600,000 and provides for the
construction of pump stations on Seasage Drive, Miramar Drive,
Waterway Lane, Beach Drive, Island Drive, Harbour Drive and
rehabilitation of the pump station on Thomas Street; with
funding through short term financing scenario.
D. SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 22/HAZEN AND SAWYER. P. C. : Consider
Service Authorization No. 22 to the contract with Hazen and
Sawyer, P. C. , in the amount of $48,418.00, for engineering
services for design and construction of new pump stations on
Miramar Drive and Atlantic Avenue. Funding will be available
from Stormwater Utility - Miramar Drive Pump Stations (Account
No. 448-5411-538-62.45) and Atlantic Avenue Pump Stations
(Account No. 448-5411-538-62.46), through proceeds from short
term note.
E. WEST ATLANTIC AVENUE GREENWAY PLAN PHASE III: Consider
approval of the West Atlantic Avenue Greenway Plan Phase III
for the current fiscal year, in the amount of $25,000 with
funding to be shared 50/50 between the City and the Community
Redevelopment Agency. Funding of the City's share ($12,500) is
available from General Construction Fund - Greenway Plan/West
Atlantic Avenue (Account No. 334-4141-572-61.36) .
F. BEAUTIFICATION PLANS FOR WEST ATLANTIC AVENUE : Consider
approving the final landscape plans for West Atlantic Avenue
(between the CSX Railroad and Military Trail) as prepared by
Cotleur Hearing, Inc. , and authorize bidding the project.
G. CHANGE ORDER NO. 2/SUN ART PAINTING CORPORATION: Consider
Change Order No. 2 to the contract with Sun Art Painting
Corporation for repainting the Water Treatment Plant. The
change order is in the amount of $6,300.00 and includes a 28
calendar day contract extension. Funding is available from
Water & Sewer Maintenance - Buildings (Account No. 441-5143-
536-46.10) .
H. APPOINTMENT OF LIAISON TO STATE REPRESENTATIVE WILLIAM F.
ANDREWS. DISTRICT 87: Consider the appointment of a liaison to
Representative William F. Andrews for issues related to State
government.
I. APPOINTMENT TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD: Appoint an
alternate member to the Code Enforcement Board for a three year
term ending January 14, 1998.
-4-
J. RESOLUTION NO. 5-95: Consider Resolution No. 5-95 in support
of the construction of a direct connector between Interstate 95
and Palm Beach International Airport, known as "Build
Alternative 3A-2".
10. Public Hearings:
A. ORDINANCE NO. 5-95: An ordinance amending Chapter 96, "Fire
Safety and Emergency Services", Subheading "Emergency Medical
Services", of the City Code to revise definitions, enact new
fees, provide for a method for collection of fees, and
designate the Fire Department as the provider for advanced life
support and emergency medical services within the City of
Delray Beach.
B. ORDINANCE NO. 1-95: An ordinance repealing Chapter 112, "Alarm
Systems", of the City Code in its entirety, and enacting a new
Chapter 112, "Alarm Systems", to provide for the regulation of
alarm systems.
C. ORDINANCE NO. 4-95: An ordinance rezoning a 10.23 acre parcel
of land from PC (Planned Commercial) District to RM (Medium
Density Residential) District. The subject property is located
on the south side of Lindell Boulevard, between South Dixie
Highway and South Federal Highway.
D. ORDINANCE NO. 3-95: An ordinance amending Section 4.4.10,
"Automotive Commercial (AC) District", Subsection 4.4.10 (H) ,
"Special Regulations", of the Land Development Regulations by
adding a subparagraph (5) to provide for relief from open space
requirements, subject to required findings.
E. ORDINANCE NO. 2-95: An ordinance amending Section 2.4.2,
"Notice Requirements", Subsection 2.4.2(B} (1) (a), "Annexa-
tions", Section 2.4.5(C}, "Annexation of Territory", and
Article 4.2, "Annexation and Initial Zoning", of the Land
Development Regulations to clarify notice and procedural
requirements for voluntary and non-voluntary annexations.
11. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items from the Public-
Immediately following Public Hearings.
A. City Manager's response to prior public comments and inquiries.
B. From the Public.
12. First Readings:
A. ORDINANCE NO. 6-95: An ordinance annexing to the City that
property consisting of High Point West and surrounding areas,
subject to approval by a majority of those registered electors
voting in the area proposed to be annexed at a referendum
election on annexation to be held on March 14, 1995. If
passed, public hearing on February 7, 1995.
-5-
B. ORDINANCE NO. 7-95: An ordinance amending Section 101.35(F) of
the City Code by increasing the permit fee for boat storage on
the municipal beach. If passed, public hearing on February 7,
1995.
C. ORDINANCE NO. 8-95: An ordinance designating the Solomon D.
Spady House located at 170 N.W. 5th Avenue as a local historic
site. If passed, public hearing February 7, 1995.
D. ORDINANCE NO. 9-95: An ordinance designating the Susan
Williams House located at 30 N.W. 3rd Avenue as a local
historic site. If passed, public hearing February 7, 1995.
13. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items.
A. City Manager
B. City Attorney
C. City Commission
-6-
c>(
t7A1
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA - CITY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - JANUARY 17. 1995 - 6:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 P.M.
COMMISSION CHAMBERS
AGENDA ADDENDUM
THE REGULAR AGENDA IS AMENDED TO INCLUDE:
9.K. DELRAY BEACH RAILROAD STATION PROJECT: Consider Worthing Park
site for the railroad station, and authorization of City
resources to develop a site plan and a foundation plan for the
project.
0,
~,
WHEREAS, in 1895, William S. Linton and Henry
swinton of Saginaw, Michigan and their pioneer group called the
"Michigan Connection", and the pioneer black families of Fagan
Henry and Jane Monroe, from the Florida Panhandle, purchased
and settled land which was then called the Town of Linton, and,
WHEREAS, the Town of Linton's first settlers ...
men and women, black and white .,. exhibited unmatched
perseverance and determination, working together through great
hardship to settle and develop what has become Delray Beach;
and,
WHEREAS, the settlement took several temporary
names, until about 1901 when a meeting was held in the School
Building to choose a permanent name. Six pioneers were
present, three of whom had come from Delray, a suburb of
Detroit, Michigan. It was at their suggestion that the town
site be named Delray; and,
WHEREAS, the Town of Delray incorporated in 1911,
being that part of the old Town of Linton on the west side of
the Intracoastal Waterway. In 1923, the east side of the
waterway incorporated as the Town of Delray Beach. In 1927,
the Town of Delray and the Town of Delray Beach united as the
City of Delray Beach; and,
WHEREAS, the year 1995 marks the 100th Anniversary
of the founding of our community, we seek to honor those early
pioneers and Delray's humble beginnings.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the
City of Delray Beach, Florida, on behalf of the City
Commission, do hereby declare the year of 1995 as
DELRAY BEACH'S CENTENNIAL
and urge all of our community to come together and celebrate
the proud heritage of our community which has grown to become
an All America City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
caused the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida,
to be affixed this 17th day of January, 1995.
MAYOR
THOMAS E. LYNCH
SEAL
~,A .
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER tJ?t1.
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM. ~.A. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
RESOLUTION NO. 3-95/ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF S.E. 4TH
STREET
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
This is before the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 3-95 which
abandons a portion of the S.E. 4th Street right-of-way lying
between S.E. 7th Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway. The
homeowner to the north submitted the abandonment petition to
provide a conforming side yard setback for an intended addition to
the existing residence. The subject right-of-way is approximately
25 feet by 130 feet, or 3,250 square feet. It is unimproved and
appears to be part of the adjacent owner's yard. There is a rock
and rubble seawall at the east end of the right-of-way.
Environmental Services advises that the existing seawall is in poor
condition and is not conducive to public access.
Policy B-1.2 of the Comprehensive Plan states that additional
marina facilities and waterway access shall be provided. A recent
study by the Planning Department of public rights-of-way which
extend to the Intracoastal Waterway concludes that the overall
policy of the City should be that the street ends nQt be abandoned.
The one identified exception to this policy is S.E. 4th Street.
Abandonment of this area will notl from a practical standpointl
reduce public access to the Intracoastal Waterway. There is
insufficient right-of-way to develop public access and the east end
of the right-of-way is not directly adjacent to the seawall,
thereby preventing pedestrian access to the waterway.
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at its
meeting of December 19, 1994, and recommended approval subject to
the provision of replacement easements to cover the existing
utilities and written verification from the receiving property
owner of his understanding that maintenance of the adjacent seawall
will now become a private expense. Acceptance of the easements is
an item on tonight's agenda. The maintenance statement has been
received and approved by the City Attorney.
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 3-95 abandoning a portion of
S.E. 4th Street, lying between S.E. 7th Avenue and the Intracoastal
Waterway.
ref:agmem04 ~cm ~
J 1
\ I
RESOLUTION NO. 3-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, VACATING AND ABANDONING A
PORTION OF SOUTHEAST 4TH STREET, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT
OF MAP OF THE TOWN OF LINTON (NOW DELRAY BEACH), AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 3 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS
OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN.
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach, Florida, received an
application for abandonment of a portion of Southeast 4th Street,
lying between S.E. 7th Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway, as more
particularly described herein; and
WHEREAS, the application for abandonment of a portion of
Southeast 4th Street was processed pursuant to Section 2.4.6(0),
MAbandonment of Rights-of-WayP, of the Land Development Regulations of
the City of Delray Beach; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to LOR Section 2.4.6(0) (3) (d), the
Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, formally reviewed
this item on December 19, 1994, and recommended approval of the
abandonment be approved, based upon positive findings pursuant to LOR
Section 2.4.6(0)(5); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Oelray Beach,
Florida, finds that its interest in the described property, is no
longer needed for the public good and deems it to be in the best
interest of the City of Delray Beach to vacate and abandon said
right-of-way, subject to receipt of required utility easements and
based upon positive findings pursuant to LOR Section 2.4.6(0)(5).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF ,THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That pursuant to Chapter 177.101(5) and Chapter
166 of the Florida Statutes, it is hereby determined to vacate and
abandon all right and interest it holds to the following real
property, subject to receipt of required utility easements, more
particularly described as follows:
That part of Southeast 4th Street (formerly Watson
Street), as shown on the Plat of Map of the Town of
Linton (now Delray Beach), as recorded in Plat Book
1, Page 3 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida, described as follows:
f I
t
\,
,.
Commence at the Southwest corner of Block 128 of the
said Plat of Map of the Town of Linton; thence North
90 degrees 00' 00. East, along the South line of said
Block 128, 20.00 feet to the Point of Beginning;
thence continue North 90 degrees 00' 00" East, along
said South line, 130.01 feet to the West right-of-way
line of the Intracoastal Waterway, as shown on the
Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 17, Page 16B of
the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida;
thence South 0 degrees 50' 021l West, along said West
right-of-way line, 25.00 feet to a line 25.00 feet
south of and parallel with the South line of said
Block 128; thence North 90 degrees 00' 00" West,
along said parallel line, 129.21 feet to the
intersection with a line 20.00 feet East of and
parallel with the West line of said Block 128; thence
North 1 degree 00' 30.. West, along said parallel
line, 25.00 feet to the said Point of Beginning.
Containing 3,250 square feet, more or less.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 17th day
of January, 1995.
ATTEST: ~cfrL-
Q1J~1W ~l'.kt ';r !I();!;y
l.ty le k
.
- 2 - Res. No. 3-95
:=- . .I~' .
- ____~ f- _ II I t I - . f-I .. ..-
-s.~ 2ND ~ I J J J I
I rr: CI ~ ~. _ C1::' I ..._.--'.l-~NGRAHAM-;::::; --
~ _ -<c I- I f--r--- -
- '---,-
J C/) - -
-
I ~ -
;I: 1 0 I -
() r--
-L I r ~ ~~
s. ~~ S1 e
. 0::: ~~
Q 0 I s:.-
:z I I-
;;;;;; ::>
o 0 :z -
m m
~ j; -
::> ~ I......:-
~ I~ ~
cJ
o ~ I
-
,/ -.
~S..E.~ "TH ~ I CASUARINA 10-.-
I . I c---l- "'" . -
. ~ 3
. I 4-
....
:J
4-
0::
o
U
~~ f-- r 13 BUCIlA III RO. ~
.. ffi
~ > ~
<l. ~ ..
s.E. 6ni 51. I r 0 I
1_ H._ ~ ME1..AI..E\JCA RD.
~ ~:~ \. lr ]/
""'\ I&J 7 )
I. U A
i~ ~~ ~i
S.E. }.f TAMARIND RD
r l -~ I II .} f--
--~
- r 7! I--
~ -
~
T\.I cnJ eAUHINIA ~
N
~
-'-OOO'AIllWCHT ABAN DON M ENT
an or Ol:UIA Y lKJ.Of. A.
-- oarAL SASe IIAP Sl':r7ni --
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
~~~'
THRU: DIANE DOMI GUEZ, ~
01 CTOR PL NG & ZONING
FROM:
SUBJECT: MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 1995
ABANDONMENT OF S.E. 4TH STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
**CONSENT AGENDA**
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
approval of the abandonment of a portion of the S.E. 4th
Street right-of-way. The right-of-way is located between
S.E. 7th Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway.
This right-of-way abandonment is being processed pursuant
to LDR Section 2.4.6.(0), Abandonment of Rights-of-Way.
B A C K G R 0 U N D:
The subject right-of-way was dedicated by the Town of Linton
Plat, recorded in July, 1896. The right-of-way separates B,lock
128, Town of Linton (to the north from Block 1, Osceola Park (to
the south) . The area surrounding the right-of-way has been
developed with single family homes.
The single family homeowner to the north submitted the
abandonment petition. The stated reason reason for the proposed
abandonment is to provide a conforming side yard setback for an
intended addition to the owner's residence.
For additional information and analysis, please refer to the
attached Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at its
meeting of December 19, 1994. The Board recommended approval of
the subject abandonment, pursuant to the following conditions:
1- That utility easements be provided to cove~ the existing
FPL lines and storm drainage facilities, prior to
scheduling the abandonment for City Commission approval;
and
City Commission Documentation
Abandonment of S.E. 4th Street
Page 2
2. That the receiving property owner (south 70 feet of Block
128) provide written verification of his understanding that
the maintenance of the adjacent seawall shall now become a
private expense.
The easement and maintenance statement have been received and
approved by the City Attorney's Office.
R E COM MEN D E D ACT ION:
By motion, approve the abandonment of the portion of S.E. 4th
Street, lying between S.E. 7th Avenue and the Intracoastal
Waterway, based upon positive findings pursuant to LDR Section
2.4.6(0) (5).
Attachment:
* P&Z Staff Report, Location Map, Reduced Survey
-r:SE4STCC.DOC
'.PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH --- STAFF REPORT ---
.
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1994
AGENDA ITEM; III. A.
ITEM: Abandonment of Right-of-way for S.E. 4th Street lying between
S.E. 7th Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway.
GENERAL DATA:
tJl I II I
II J l II I I
S.E. 2,.,0 ST.
Owner....................City of Delray Beach [ I
.L-
Applicant................William and Mabel I'- ~
McDonough I'- - ~
I'-
I'- - - I--
Agent....................Robert W. Federspiel I'- - ~
f- - -
Location.................SE 4th Street right- I"- - -
[ - -
of-way, between SE 7th - - ,-
Avenue and the ICWW. ~-
~ ~ ~. .---
0 I
Property Size............3250 square feet. ':-' - Z I
:)
f- :) 0
City Land Use Plan.......Low Density Residential v m
...., I
t- t--
r- 0::
City Zoning..............R-l-AA (Single Family I;::::: 0
tI1 Z
Residential) I-- -'i
I--
t-
Existing Land Use........Unimproved street right- I-- I t::J ~
of-way. 'S.L 4lli
r---- ~-
Request..................Abandonment of 25 foot -
by 130.01 foot alley -
right-of-way between SE -
-
7th Avenue and the ICWW. ;:;'
-
---.
-
-
- w '='"'
-~ r> -.J
EST. r<-4. <(
I-
-r-- If)
- -I-- <(
- I - I-- :r:
- I- - 0
L1') c.o U
- -
- <(
- 0::::
- .u t-
l.1J Z
-vi ,Ii -
:rr:: Iii -' .L
- --- --- .---- -- - I t
-
- '-
.- --
-- I
IILA.
I T E M B E FOR E THE BOA R D :
The item before the Board is the recommendation to the City
Commission for the proposed abandonment of a portion of the S.E.
4th Street right-of-way. The subject right-of-way is located
between S.E. 7th Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway.
This right-of-way abandonment is being processed pursuant to LDR
Section 2.4.6(0), Abandonment of Rights-of-Way.
B A C K G R 0 U N D .
.
The subject right-of-way was dedicated by the Town of Linton
Plat, recorded in July, 1896. The right-of-way separates Block
128, Town of Linton ( to the north) from Block 1, Osceola Park
(to the south). The area surrounding the right-of-way has been
developed with single family homes.
On November 4, 1994 a petition was received by the Planning and
Zoning Department to abandon a portion of the S.E. 4th Street
right-of-way, as referenced above. The abandonment petition was
submitted by the owner of the lot to the north of the
right-of-way section. The stated reason for the proposed
abandonment is to provide a conforming side yard setback for an
intended addition to the owner's single family residence.
A BAN DON MEN T DES C RIP T ION .
.
The subject right-of-way is approximately 25' x 130' (3250 sq.
ft. ) . Currently, the right-of-way is unimproved and appears to
be a part of the adjacent owner's yard.
To the north and south of the right-of-way are single family
residences, to the east is the Intracoastal Waterway Canal, and
to the west is the S.E. 7th Avenue right-of-way. Zoning to the
north, east, south, and west of the subject right-of-way is
R-1AA (Single Family Residential).
A BAN DON MEN T A N A L Y 5 I 5 .
.
Based upon the survey that was submitted concurrently with the
abandonment petition, the right-of-way is unimproved except for
a private parking space. There are Florida Power and Light and
drainage structures located within the right-of-way area. At
the east end of the right-of-way there is also a rock and rubble
seawall. Florida, Power, and Light and the City's Environmental
Services Department have no objections to the abandonment,
provided easements are dedicated for their facilities.
Environmental Services has also provided notification that the
existing seawall is in poor condition and is not conducive to
public access.
P & Z Staff Repo~T
S.E. 4th Street Abandonment
Page 2 . .="" ....,,-
Maintenance of the seawall is a currently a City burden and if
the right-of-way is abandoned, the adjacent property owners will
be responsible for its maintenance. Southern Bell, Leadership
Cable, and Florida Public Utili ties (gas) have no facilities
within the right-of-way and have given their release. The City
of Delray's Fire Department has provided their objection. This
objection is based upon maintaining access to the Intracoastal
Waterway, which is addressed in the following section.
Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan Policy B-1.2,
additional marina facilities and waterway access shall be
provided. While not specifically stated, the above policy has
generally been interpreted to mean existing public access to the
Intracoastal will be retained and/or enhanced. Recently, the
Planning Department completed a study of public rights-of-way
that extend to the Intracoastal Waterway. The study analyzed
the size of the street ends, and their use or potential use for
providing public access to the Intracoastal. Some are wide
enough to potentially be modified to provide parking for people
who want to view the water or fish from the canal. Given the
limi ted public access to the Intracoastal, the existence of
public facilities within many of the rights-of-way, and the need
for emergency access to the waterway, the study concluded that
the overall policy of the City should be that the street ends
not be abandoned.
The one possible exception to that policy is S.E. 4th Street.
The subject area consists of a 25 ft. right-of-way, which is
essentially half of a road section. Records indicate that
right-of-way was dedicated from one plat to the north (Town of
Linton), but no right-of-way was dedicated from the plat to the
south (Osceola Park). Therefore, sufficient right-of~way does
not exist to develop an improved street end. It is not evident
to the public that the area is public right-of-way as it has
been used by the southern property owner as a parking space. If
the abandonment is approved, this parking area will become part
of the lot to the north. The owner to the south of the
right-of-way has alternative paved access to his property from
S. E. 7th Avenue. Abandonment of this area will not from a
practical standpoint reduce public access to the Intracoastal,
as the area appears to be private property. Furthermore,
sufficient area does not exist to develop public access via
parking and the east end of the right-of-way is not directly
adjacent to the seawall (thereby preventing pedestrian access to
the Intracoastal).
With right-of-way abandonments, the right-of-way area is usually
divided along the centerline and returned equally to the
adjacent property owners. In this situation, the entire
right-of-way area was originally dedicated from the north
property within Block 128. Therefore, the southern property
owner within Osceola Park will not receive any of the abandoned
area. This situation was expected to cause concern from the
southern property owner. However, the applicant has stated that
if the abandonment is approved the right-of-way will be divided
and shared as a private matter.
P & Z Staff Repo~Y
S.E. 4th Street Abandonment
Page 3 . .-.::"'=:--s=~
R E QUI RED FIN DIN G S .
.
Prior to any right-of-way abandonment being approved, the
following findings must be made:
A) That there is not, nor will there be a need for the use of
the right-of-way for any public purpose.
The provision of additional waterway access is addressed
in general terms within the City's Comprehensive Plan.
However in this case, sufficient area does not exist to
provide adequate public access within 25' of right-of-way.
Easements can be obtained for the existing utility
facilities and no right-of-way extension is planned for
this area. The maintenance of the existing seawall will be
a responsibility of the adjacent property owners. Based
upon the above, there is not a public need for the subject
area as a right-of-way.
B) That the abandonment does not, nor will not, prevent access
to a lot of record.
No prevention of access to existing lots of record will
result from this abandonment as both properties north and
south of the subject right-of-way have legal access from
s.E. 7th Avenue.
C) That the abandonment will not result in detriment for the
provision of access and/or of utility services to adjacent
properties or the general area.
Replacement easements will be required for the existing FPL
lines and storm drainage facilities located within the
subject right-of-way. Access to adjacent properties is
provided from S.E. 7th Avenue. Access to the Intracoastal
will be eliminated, but as it has not been evident as
public access, in practical terms it is not being
diminished. Therefore, no detriment will result for the
provision of access or utility services from the proposed
abandonment.
REV I E W B Y o THE R 5 .
.
The property is at the southern end of the Marina Historic
District. The abandonment will be reviewed by the Historic
Preservation Board at its meeting of December 21, 1994. A
courtesy notice was also sent to the owner south of the subject
right-of-way. To date, no objections have been received.
Comments from the owner to the south, if any, will be
transmitted to the Planning and Zoning Board at its meeting.
The Historic Preservation Board's recommendation will be
transmitted to the City Commission with consideration of the
abandonment.
.
P & Z Staff Rep01L
S.E. 4th Street Abandonment
~ -~-""'!!:~
Page 4
ASS E SSM E N T .
.
While on the surface a case can be made to retain the subject
area for additional waterway access, given its limited size, it
is unlikely that usable public access would be developed within
this area. The subject right-of-way area contains only a half
section of road (25' ) and appears as a portion of the adjacent
single family development. For these reasons, a finding can be
made that the abandonment does not result in detriment to the
provision of public access.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1- Continue with direction.
2. Recommend approval of the abandonment.
3. Recommend approval of the abandonment, pursuant to
conditions.
4. Recommend denial of the abandonment with reasons stated.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, transmit a recommendation of approval to the City
Commission for the abandonment of S.E. 4th Street, between s.E.
7th Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway, subject to the
following conditions:
l. That utility easements be provided to cover the
existing FPL lines and storm drainage facilities,
prior to scheduling the abandonment for City
Commission approval.
2. That the receiving property owner (south 70 feet of
Block 128) provide written verification of his
understanding that the maintenance of the adjacent
seawall shall now become a private expense.
Attachments
* Location Map & Reduced Survey
Y:4TI-iSTPZ.DOC
. .
I
~ ~z~~-~.~~o~~~~o ~~O~~ 0
~ ,... ."'NO"'.."'",,~orr~ OCITICIIX m
~ --~~~~~~ --O~ rmr ~ ~ I
~ OO.~..~~_~~OZZ~ rr>>~~ 0 I
~ ~g~~~%>>GO~~~QO~ ~O~a~ ~ i
::: O."'Oxo-",,,, 00....,.0 en ... 'V ~
~ -wr m~Q.o-C~x m ->>~z>> ~ !
- %0 -eX :to z-t "':I fit"' -4 - I
~ .... :.XO)o-tx--c::rar... 0.0 0 \.
- .-mrrtz ZD "'~~~ OOZO Z
... O. -4 000 """00 >>X"..
-c "ft. %i~.."'g~3ii~~~ ~:-'~CII '" '
a ......~~..z.."'z::r m "'0 ~ I
CI5 ",rx", :a;"'-C-tCA- -.... 0... c ..
~ QO",>>~.~~ .... zrxcn ~0~"" ~
.~ i li . := g;: ,..... ~:= w ~ i '" g 'U :u ~ ~ ~ I(~ rr.r Ct r ~ j'
~ ~ III : ~ 0 ~ z ~ ~ . ~ -c '" ~ ~ ~ ~ -t :; /' t?r DL#r~ h! \ t
::: Z"-4-0 "'0 "oXOllll XOO-4 r;:- "I
t;t ~ 0.- ~ .J. ~.. ~ ~;;: .... ~ ,. z ~ GI ~ .,. .. ~ i'A"~ P , .
II> - . -4NO- >>"'0"'0-4 mmX-4 ~ . . "-
"3 .. Z ll. Z VI .. l( '" m .. ." .. 0 .. x ., _ p .;( ,,;=:=-=-'c:r-~.::' - I .
~ t"'::;"-40.' :~~oo,...g 2-"'en ,'" ~ ...!' ~.
1'\ "0%""%0-40- 0 ->> ZO-4 ~"~
~ ::,....~"'"1Ii"'...a~~~~ 8'V"'~ ,~ ,_'
~ ~ ~,.. Q ~ III a;;'" -4 i 8 ~:a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $Er /..R. '"
--MC~NG~%C~..o ~~~ ~
roz.~ Xm~ ~ ~ t
i.....oz~~~il(z;;~.. - ~c;;!I \
rtlr-N r 0 Ziti. .",r ,""O.2J
. 8~:i.':~o~~. 1i8 :;~Z~
N~o>>~romz .Nm~ D-O~
1ft 0" >>00 _.. ,.,..
. - rozo"....-o. z- c -<
ON'1I,....."'NC:x~ .0. N ......,..
0.'",'" ,.'" 00.. ... -.
...~rMN.r 0 0 ex.
.. .... .",. -"W 1"11 00 om........
=~~~oo-o~~~:g~ :~~~ I
-t!:~i..?~~-4.. -4.;~ 20~z ,\, I'
~g-4' ""8;::~g;!!(~~~m ;"~~ . \.1 ~I
0- ",o:a", 0 "'." "'-4ll>> ~ ~,__ " r"j,
-4 ." N .. -4 0 :a r Z -4... 0 % '" ~ . -\J... r \. \.',,1
z '" '" '" '" - 0 % - - m '" \" " / I'" '" . \I ....
...... "ozmo.. -4 I' _, """"" t.
Z N - 0'" m '" ~ \ ~'~I'" , ~./$' fo-
o - 0 ." - . , ~ ~ '" . \J' "
" ~ ~I" ~ -.......r--... . -.I \
, ( "'~" ~I~ ~ '- '" ,f'
: ,-'~ ~.. ~ 'I':'" h~ ~ , "I
I "~""""~.I... .. .J1 ~ ~. " ~ ~ \" ~~ ~ ~ ~ _'\'
~ ii: aM ~Olil oIC ~ ~''i ~..., AV -.. ;.~:U ~r\\' ~ \: "I, "
I ,VE ;. 'j 3:.f"" " ........ AV ~ I , ;... ....\ ~~" ~ ' " \i
1 _ 1-- ~ , .. .~ s" , AYf - - NJ ,\, '\~ . "'I ":,' \ ~ ~ ~ ~,',
:: .I!:'... I" .. SW ' I AV HOW - Il . \1 " I;i " ~I~ ~ \ "'" "', !',\
'-.; '. if;6. ~AVl _ S ~ ~~" '"'1' ::t.; ~ '\0 .\~:\
" ..: f: - ~ .; ow ; · ~ !.t ,2!!! 1~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ - '-'~ i
~ i;i ~ I!! 'i i-' ... u b AV.( .1~~ ,- ~j '!l ~:'i ~ ~I ;'\ "':!I ~ ... i
~ 'i! 'to..." - -I A'!... i... 2'" H f 1.1..1.S --! " \ ~. ~ ~ I\l'\ ~ '\\ j
"I.. - :; ~ ~l ',~... ~ t r' AV( ..P:..~ ~ ' , ~ .... '1:1 ~...." t.. ~y~ ~ ~ I
j ~ in !: I!l t :"F ..... <\I\mJ ~-" \ '11"::\ ~~ . .
I ,,:r. ~ ~ ~, . ~:\~ . 1:\ "-
I ~ Iii . S' I AV( fU HE' . ',~ ~ ~II~;.\ ~ 1:\ ~
! IE' AY ....~ Z Z I . .,.""'... "'. ,'"
t\,.'.::... A I: . _ . AV(r'HE ~ 2 M ,,~ ~ ...I"~ ~ 1):, ;
~ " 10.01:' .. ...- '"''' ~ "'II "\.. I . I
~. Ii' IE-] AV '" ,""n'..i "1] AvE r;.!- .~ ~ .... ~ oJ ~
i ,,! P. H ... . AY . " ...... ~ AV( _ i H!. AV( N j 'II '
I'=.. - -.-.. ~ -' II 1
N_I.... I -, II
I ~ ~r:; 'c",,-- ~ C IE ~, ~.J( ",' H~..- ~I
I ~ ~~~-'-'- ... .~~.. fl.. I~ -, .,;tJ
'\.:'1- ri...-S;;-:-,~iilI;~:-'" Int,,,,..:.:,.,,.]. -i~ j ~I!'r I'..It. -..... ' /$[/' ,.R.
~ · el\.J!f~~''''',';';i:I._' "'"1_ - /
I 1~-;;jJ~ I J:. e.-y__ :--r-If.. ..... -r r WF~r 1'<'1'11h'r
j_iIi- u:~i Ij.F efl1 r~. 'n...1 ~..~.. ~-A': 'r I(//lY UpE
" i f-'IiIil1I~g!:,Uj~H".=t.' ...-1 f. dr/Al'r.R//t't:7I'Or/lL
i _1' c ~o.:il ri1; rl! ~9 " W'4r~/:!'IP'/ly'
I [ W~ -:::: .~; t"~G. /7, .P6'. /,,~) Rd("~ p
S (,Jm Ocean ~ · .e (/61 g L c-
hi ~ - .F~'4 fC/4LL
! \l~~ 1;= /IV T~A eoA' 5TA t.
.; ~~ I~C! ;H ~ ~ W,4rE.K'#4,Y
~ C) a:r :.~- ~ ~
~ lii~ '.il ~
; ~ ~ ~ 5:~' " ~ ~ ~ ; I ~ ~ ~
--: . ~ Y'~ ';\ ~ ~, 1 . ~ ~ ~ !
I !:I CIl lit ~ ~ '" ~ I I e ~ "',
I ..cc: ~ "l..- : ~~. ,,~ '"
,... :lQ - ,,," ~ ~ ~ 1 . -.
: :s: < -t ~ ~ '\..- ~ :\.: "\ .... ...
I ~ ~ rrI "\. " ~ ~. ~ " .... ~ ",
~ 0 :rei '-.-- , ~ \\ "" ~ '
~ 'l :t.. ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:\ ~ '\ "',
~ !" r ~ \" ~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
!!!~~ ~ ~ ~'" ~~,,~ ~~~ '
S z a:r ~ ....'-.. ~ t> I ~ '\ ~ \ '\ <:::,; I
0110 .... "k.... t' "\),,~ t.,>-':
I III _ ~ '~ ). 1:\ ):: t. :-... 'l " :
I ,~"'rr1 ~ ~ "-') ~~~ ih~ :
10_ :"\ ,,' '<\....':".'\ ~ I
1 .;r s: ~ ;;; ~ I. 1).,,' ',' " \1 ~ ", \:\ i
A ..... Z - <:> " . . \ ,,' , '" .
: ....:,;J z - .. E: <:' '-<-. ~, '., \'1 I
; ". 0,., _ ~ '- " " , I
I ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~"" ~\. ,\\ I
. 0....1 ." I. ,
! ~~ c:-. .. III . :u ~ -- \t- 7L f
~f f.. i
.
.
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CI TY MANAGER t1t<1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~.13. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
ACCEPTANCE OF UTILITY EASEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH S.E. 4TH
STREET ABANDONMENT (RESOLUTION NO. 3-95)
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
This is before the Commission to accept a utility easement
associated with the abandonment of a portion of S.E. 4th Street,
between S.E. 7th Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway.
There are FP&L lines and City storm drainage facilities within the
right-of-way to be abandoned under Resolution No. 3-95. A
condition of that abandonment is a replacement utility easement for
maintenance of the existing facilities. The applicant has
submi tted the easement, and it has been reviewed and approved by
the City Attorney. A condition of this acceptance is that the
initial 10 ft. easement intended to cover the storm drainage pipe
within the right-of-way be changed to a 15 ft. easement.
Recommend acceptance of the utility easement to cover the existing
facilities within the S.E. 4th Street right-of-way, between S.E.
7th Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway, subject to the 10 ft.
easement being changed to a 15 ft. easement.
~ on ~
ref:agmemo5
" '. 01<,
~
,
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: ~:~ITY MANAGER
THRU: IANE DOMIN EZ,
FROM: STEVEN E. OR
PLANNER
SUBJECT: MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 1995
ACCEPTANCE OF UTILITY EASEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE
S.E. 4TH STREET ABANDONMENT **CONSENT AGENDA**
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
acceptance of a utility easement associated with the
abandonment of a portion of the S.E. 4th street
right-of-way. The right-of-way is located between S.E. 7th
Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway.
B A C K G R 0 U N D:
In November, 1994, a petition was submitted to abandon the
eastern extension of s.E. 4th Street between S.E. 7th Avenue and
the Intracoastal Waterway. The abandonment petition was
submitted by the property owner to the north in order to create
a conforming side yard setback for an intended addition to his
single family residence.
During review of the abandonment petition, it was discovered
that FPL lines and a City storm drainage pipe are existing
within the subject right-of-way. In order to maintain these
facilities an easement is required.
The applicant has submitted an easement to cover the
aforementioned facilities and the easement has been approved by
the City Attorney's Office.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board is not required to review the
acceptance of utility easements.
City Commission Documentation
Acceptance of Utility Easement
Page 2
R E COM MEN D E D ACT ION:
By motion, concurrent with the approval of the abandonment
petition, accept the utility easement intended to cover the
existing FPL lines and City storm drainage facilities within the
s.E. 4th Street right-of-way, lying between S.E. 7th Avenue and
the Intracoastal Waterway, subject to the following condition:
* That the 10' easement intended to cover the existing
storm drainage pipe within the right-of-way be changed
to a 15' easement.
Attachment:
* Easement Deed & Reduced Survey
T:4STESMT.DOC
. . "
, , -
.
GRAN~ Of EA8~Nt
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
THIS INDENTURE madQ and entered into this day of
, 1995, by and between WILLIAN C.
McDOHOUGB and MABLE K. McnOROUGH, hi. w~fe, of the County of Palm
Beach and State of Florida, Grantor., and the CITY OF DELRAY BBACa,
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, BDd SOUTHERN BELL ~ELEPKOHB AND
~ELEGRAPH, of the Counties of Palm Beach,
and , Stato of Florida,
and , Grantees;
WHEREAS, the Grantors are seized in fee simple and in
possession of lands described and listed on Exhibit "A" att8ched
hereto; and
WHEREAS, Grantees request the conveyance of utility easemente
to them over a portion of Grantors property for utility purposGs;
and
WHEREAS, Grantors have agreed in consideration of the sum of
Ten Doll~rs (S10.00) and othQr good and vGlu.:lble conaideraL.i.ull to
grant to thA Grantees and easorr.ent for utility purposes over
portione of the lImd descr.Lbed in tho lltt8ched Exhib.l t tl1\." for the
purpoBoB and in the mdnner ex~re8Bed below;
NOW, THIS INDENTURE WITNESSE~H~
That, in purRu~nce of this agreement And in cone1derALlon at
the Bum of 'fen Oollars ($10.00) end othor 900d and valuable
considoration, receipt. of which is acknowledged, G.cantora qrant
unto the ~rl\nteas an easemQnt for the purpoees of lnetallinq,
ted l<ltl9G : et SE.6 t P0 "Lllo'_- 68t'S ?~: .:.cr : '0::', 3110~.:! 'I;'d 'l31dSCl3fJ3.:J "'1 1Cl380d : UJO..l.:J
. .
.
j'~ve1\ otO\.Jl ~Ile-~~ f'f
constructing, ma~ntaininq, and repairing utilities over~feet
(?j-) on e~ther side of the centerline of those certain existing
utility lines, wires and anchors es depicted on the survey at~ached
hereto dS Exhibit "A" I reserving unto GrAntors all reversionary
rights therein upon the abandonment of the easement or the Grantees
ceaBing to utilize the sarne.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, G~antors have Bet their handa and seale on
the day and year first above written.
William C. McDonuugh
Mable K. McDonough
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
Before me this day personally appeared WILLIAMC. McDONOUGH
and MABLE K. McDONOUGH, who are personally knowr. to me or who
produoed as
identification and who acknowledged before me that they executed
SQid instrument for the purposes thorein expressed.
WITNESS my h4nd 4nd official coal, thia day of
, 1995.
Notary Public
State of Flo.t:'iua.
My commission expires.
(St:A.L.) Commieelon no. I
rod l.JdLP:2;:t St.:,6t PEl OUl?: 68t"S '?.:..;; ~Ot' : 'crl ;rlOHd ol:<'d '13 i dS,d3'J3.:l 'f') 10380<:; : wO.!.:l
. '.
I
@ ~z~~-~.~~o~~~~o ~~O~~ 0
~ ~ ~~t~:g:~m~~~~~~ ~~~~; ~ !
~ OO.-c-.-c.....~-fozz-ct rr"''''.... 0 '
~ ~g~-c.....%>>GO~~....Qo~ ~o~s~ ~ i
:::: 0 -1910%0-",'" go....."'o en .... "V ~
- i~r-c~""i~oi""'~~3m ..~~z~ ~
~ -t :..zO.......z-.....ZGl.... 0.0 0 I
. "-rn~z %~ m~"V~ 00%0 Z
'" 0.... 000....1:)0 ",%."..
--c .,... %i~....,.g~Sii~~;! g:-,~cn I
~ ...........w..z..~Z% m mo f
~ ~:;~~i:~~....~.. ir~CIt ~t..~ !
I .=! i~.n;g~r.. ~~=~img ,,2I~ifi I
'" Z ",0 ."'-"'0 0 ",......... .",-4. j
~ -CI'ICIt...Drz,...~.. -I i:% '-0 en !
. ~ ~~...o~.~~-~~~~z~ %~~... I
j . -orz.- -~m z ~ DO ~ .
".. - .. ....NO. :0...0"'0.... "'1913'-4
· "Z... %UI. _,.."'.... .a.x... .
1 ~ ."'- .......... - 0 0... 'A"~P .
~ :o~~~g...~~...go~~ %io~
.... ~ ...... ~ f"I '11 ~ III.. c: ~ ~ ~ ~ 8'11 .,. ~ .
~ ~~rQ~"'~.M....z8~z ~~~~
--MC~...WM%C~-O ......... .'
~O~~~....~Ox,.,,.,_~~ ~G~~ :
, Zat a 0- ..~.ZN%. 000 .
i I'IrN .- 0 ZITI- ."'r'" .,.o..~
... 00"'-.0'" &1'1&0... %0 ,..~z:&:
o-.z ",%O-CO no 0 III
N~O~~,-O"'Z ON~X a-Oa
Ul 0" :DOO -... "'I'"
- - rozo.....-o- z.... 0 -<
ON'1I"'''",NC%Q -0- N ""'11'-
o.m.... tatl"l~aotGQI ... .-a
.,,-~...~~~~... ~.,,~o o~~~ I
III'" r--... 0.-0'""'0.... 1"1 OCII I
~~~iog.~~"": ~~~ ~~Z~ ,
Z CIa fit. . rill. 0 % :II 0 - 1.... I
tif;l.... ~;::~g~!(~ti~'" iii...~~ .,1 ~I
0-0"'1:)"'''' 0 "'M ......:IE'" ~ . I __ , 1'"
... ... ... ~ -f 0 '" ... Z .... ~ 0 % '" IS . -\I ~ .( '\ \.',1
~.~ ~"'::;il:)~. 0 .... ~ \", ::'j I, .\ :,"-,
z... - 0'" '" M ~ , I \'l, ~I'" \t, r.JJ6' . t-
o - 0 '"" ... ... " - ~... \.f' "
,,~ ~I~~ ::::::;::..... ,...I '_
. ~ " ~~ ~ ~I~ ~ ..... ~ ',f'
: -..I ~..:~ 'I ~ \\:3 ~ ,J
: ~ :1'~"~ ~rt~l~ sw . AVE ow'~ ~~ ~ ~~ '\ ~ \ ,\,-'
, it: .. j U I .t"" ~ I" ~ I ~ sw . AU _ . . " ' ~I \I " '" \.
j lYE SW I - - . .... . ~ ~ ~11lI" ~,," ,
! =" I.... ~ , ~,.. '..; sw , AVE - _- ~J '\' ?r~ .'- ~~.):: ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1\'
a.. ~sw . -:J "- $1ft . . aVF HW I " ~ '" .....1''" ~ " ,,\ , ,,'
. ~ .'.. ~ ~ !:'V~ - s . ~ ~ ~ .... ""l~ ~ ~ .... ~ . t.\) ~,
~ ~: =. . -OW I · ~ !it2!!! i~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ "~~1 ~ ~ -'"
~ _ ...!! ~ ~ i-I I SW w)" AV'..;o r "'''' ~~~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ....
~ Bill - 11 -I.lv : SW ... .IH-*- ~11...!.:..1 1\, 1>.. ~:J ~ 1\\'\ ~ '<I
~ ~ ~ ~1 ',..sw ~ ,r; AVO ~P:Iir.~!2 ' , t. '" " ~fI\" ~\~~ ~ ~
j ~ fi! -1=1': r: t,n U ..~.. i>i \. ~ ~ :JI~~ ~~. ~. '-
I " ! .., AVO i~lf' HO I " !\ ~ ~ I ~:\ l:!\ ~ "l
; ......1 .!!..'~ ..' .:: 'Tz 'ii "~ \\ ~I~"i~ ,\b
~ .:: IE if. 1::. ~ . AvE HE m' m ,. ~ ~ ~ I ~ . 1):',
~ ~ m 1.01'" , '~. ""OOd "'I,; ::., "'11 ....
~ i' SE" J.V "" 1'"' .., m AvE 'i.:- .... "'" .... .'\ '1 ~
,. f '..... AV m _ ... . S...... AVE ;: HI. AV' ~; 11
... .. , c II ~~. J II
I .- ...... -. I II 1
-- ....
r - - .. HIi -: 'I
I ~ I!"! r - .c."",,~ .. \.... IE' ;......J~ 'l,.~;;it ~ '
~ ~'-!J ",'- '-- ....- .., '" E ,::! fe-r cJ
I '\:..... Ti /-s;;-;, ~.~ /,'f _ *' ""~~('O<l"'aIW''>"f IU~-t:: /.,If. -..... 'G: ./ h-r ,.R.
I \J -Il~....4r '1'n.I~nr:!!!>'''f;;;;il.-J 1'..1_ ./ .At!J#~,,.,~z.. '- ,
I ll!.&ill'G..~lf l.t~lhf,:.;v-;_:-=r.... ...Ad -. r WE~r 1'<'t'6Hr I)' r.7
..iJl5 'I@'bli.nfflf, th' ~".. ~"'=' "r IP/lY UHE
! .# ! f....~n~~ ~r..l .._~ ~j_. dr ,w/""(?,ftY,,or#L
I .; ~ ., ~ F;f>:. ~: iiI. " #""r~/.?H"''''y'
I [' w~ -=---=== '. ~~ t'~.&. /7, ""'G. /~ -0) RtJt',('" p
~ (,Jm Ocean ~ > ;f' t/ d,g u'-
f'\ ~.. ~~',I/ /(/,l/LL
! \\@~~ H~ Ii /;V T//A C'CJA 5rA L
I N. ~ . .. I_
~,-:; ~ ~ ~;H :~ ~ ~ /1//1 /E~ #/1 Y
~ D'" .c. _m ~ f'-
~ ~ - ~ :-: ~ :- :: ~ "-l
"I' ~ 0'1 ~ -.- p ~ t-.... ~:'1 I I ~ ~ ~
\;\" %.., P1 -- "\.: ~., ::.". I ~.. i0
. "=0_ F ' ~~, ." ~
. . ~]II 4 ..; ~ t--... '" ,.,: 7' ,. ~ ~ ~ !
I '" en ell ~ . -, ,~ '" '" . ~ '
I : c c: !: ~ ..... - : ~ ~, "~ '"
. ... =0 - . . ,,," ~ ~ ~ I . "
; % < -f ~~ \;: ~ ~ '" ~ \\ .... ....
I. g 1"1 P1 ..~ ~" ...." ~ f,
% -<;II ~ . .... " .... ., · ~ ~ --.;
! ! ~:la i;;: ~? ~;:t.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ '1 ~~,
I - 1" Ao )0 l:: :z? : ; ~ I.):. .. ~ ~ ~ ~ \h "'.
I ~ ~ 6 : ~ ~ "'" '\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,~~. I
I ~zari ~~ ~ ~ ~ I '\91~~ \'\\.~ I
I -<O~ ;, ~ ~.... ~ l\,~,,~ ~:-.:
I · - , ~ '\;\ }.. \\ x "'l",, i
I t ~"'P1 ;; )..' ~ "I) ~~~ ~~ :
I !;r ~ ~ w?Z : l i~ ~ ~ ~ "\ \S ~ "'I ~ I
, A .... Z - <:> '7.,.. . \ ..' ..... "" ,
; .....;J z - ... I: . ;; r- ~. ~ '" \,~ \
\ ". 01'1_ ,... ..... " "\s\ I
I ~"" ~=On ~ .." ~,
! ~ ~ .. III . ~ ~ : ~ :;:-- It~ 7L I
I .J.~ "', ' I
- (-)1 (I. :
~. .L.>:~
[IT 'I OF DELRR' HEREM
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 200 NW 1st AVENUE' DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA 33444
FACSIMILE 407/278-4755 Writer's Direct Line: (407) 243-7091
DELRA Y BEACH
f l 0 . I 0 "
bed
AlJ.America City MEMORANDUM
, t II I!
DATE: January 4, 1994
1993 TO: City Commission
FROM: Susan A. Ruby, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Catherine Strong Property Deed
The County has conveyed to the City, the land known as the Catherine Strong Center
property . Attached please find a copy of the County's Deed for placement on the City
Commission agenda for formal acceptance by the City. Once the Deed has been
accepted by the City, it will be recorded. By copy of this memorandum to David
Harden, City Manager, our office requests that this deed be placed on the City
Commission consent agenda for acceptance and approval.
Attachment
cc: David Harden, City Manager
*.sar
@ Printed on Recycled Paper f.e.
. ~ ~ '0'
. .
,
COUNTY DEED
F.S. 125.411
R94 17620
PREPARED BY:
ARTHUR KAHLENBERG
PROPERTY & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
3323 BELVEDERE ROAD, BLDG. 503
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33406
COUNTY DEED
DEe 0 6 1994
THIS DEED, made this ____ day of , 1994, by
PALM BEACH COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida,
party of the first part, and CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, a
municipal corporation, party of the second part, whose post office
address is 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida 33444,
WIT N E SSE T H: That said party of the first part,
for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to it
in hand paid by the party of the second part, receipt whereof is
hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the party
of the second part, his heirs and assigns forever, that following
described real property situate in Palm Beach County, Florida:
The West 1/2 of Lot 18, section 20, Township 46 South,
Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida.
This Deed is made upon the express condition that said
real property shall be used solely and exclusively for
public park and recreational purposes, or other public
purposes, and that in the event said property is used for
any other purposes it shall automatically revert to the
party of the first part.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said party of the first part has
caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Board of
county Commissioners acting by the Chair or Vice-Chair of said
Board, the day and year aforesaid. ~
ATTEST:
DOROTHY H. WILKEN, Clerk PALM COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY
<"I - fl, ~- IT'S OF COAI COMMISSIONERS
By: ~i~AL.I/1 ~ ,~ By:
Deputy CierI< v _-~"''''COUN''''' Chair
- ~ ,u. "'~'I
:0,...... ......... I,
:0,' :.\.."^ B/2-i -.0 'r,
APPROVED AS TO ;cr-,' ~'t' ~\~ ~
:fI:C, -, ,> ~
AND LEGAL SUIjiF :: 0: CO U N T Y :~::
~ en...... ' ,en :
, \.<- ... '0,'"
~ .\ \.l OR\Qf>o-f
',~" .'~:
"1~7 '----'-0">:-
torney '",0 * S,......--
\\",,,,....
mmr\agreemnt\delray.ded
11/04/94
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER t'J1.
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ? D - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
FINAL PAYMENT/J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995
This is before the Commission to approve final payment in the
amount of $1,980 to J.J.R. Construction, for demolition of the
Master Lift Station and restroom at Veterans Park. The work is
complete and has been reviewed by the staff for compliance with
the contract documents. All related project closeout documents
have been received and are acceptable.
Recommend approval of final payment in the amount of $1,980, with
funding from Renewal and Replacement (Account No. 442-5178-536-
61.63) .
Agenda Item No. ,? b
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: January 9, 1995
Request to be placed on:
X Regular Agenda
Special Agenda
Workshop Agenda When: January 17, 1995
Description of item (who. what. where. how much): staff requests
citv Commission approval of final pavment to the contract with
J.J.R. Construction Co. . Inc. on the Demolition of Master Lift
station & Restroom at Veterans Park (#94-85). The work has been
completed and reviewed bv the staff. All required. proj ect closeout
documents have been received and are in order. The total amount of
this final pavment is for $1.980.00. Funding is available from the
Water & Sewer Renewal and Replacement Account # 442-5178-536-61.63
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/~DRAFT ATTACHED YES~
Recommendation: Staff requests approval of final payment to J. J. R.
Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $1,980.00. I~
Department head signature: #~ po,/'s-
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) :
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure
of funds): ~
Funding available: YE /NO
Funding alternative um(if,a~
Account No. & oes;JJ1Jion 1}{1l-6I'J8-slJ!, -t,IJ ~
1IJY(.(!f a.t25> r ~---~
Account Balance ().(J[j
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: YES/NO
Hold until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
.
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden
city Manager
FROM: Howard Wight ~~
Construction Manag~
DATE: January 9, 1995
SUBJECT: Agenda Request
Final Payment to J.J.R. Construction co., Inc.
Demolition of Master Lift station & Restroom
at Veterans Park
Staff requests City Commission approval of final payment to the
contract with J.J.R. Construction Co. , Inc. for Demolition of
Master Lift Station & Restroom at Veterans Park (94-85). The work
is complete and has been reviewed by the staff for compliance with
the contract documents. All related proj ect closeout documents
have been received and are acceptable.
Staff recommends approval of Final payment in the amount of
$1,980.00. Funding is available from the Water & Sewer Renewal and
Replacement Account # 442-5178-536-61.63.
cc: Jose Aguila
william H. Greenwood
File: 94-85
. .J'AH-a9-95 SUN 139:23
AM FREDERIC;O WRECKING & EQM
1 4137 276 5131218 p.al
.'. ""."
f
I
.J . , I'~. Corl:,,:,!.:1 lIC:!...l ()tl ( : (.) ,~ t 11(; (, J .I /' t.. ){"./ I~) ~',~ ,
,
HL04 I ~\li. n I, al':;t;;!::c. UI" .. f
I
l1(.I(~~~t H<..'"J.ton, Fl. ~~) ~~ 25 ~1. 1~1 () ,
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
~; La t.e Req t:t: cnc 031390 I
I
_, ~.~ ~..~ _ _~ ~~'. ,.. _0' ,.,' _ ~... ~_.. ,_" '"~ ..... ." ...' ,_'.' ". ................. .....'".,........ "..,..." ..... .... ...... _._ ..._.._ ..... ...... ........, ...... ..... __ ..... ..... ..' ..,. .. _,' ."" ,- ... .' _. ,.. ..... . ... "" ....-.. .,.' ...... ..... .,........ 'r.... ...... .."..... "',' .,'" ... ". ....... '. ." .... '. """ ~ .", I
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
J
CITY m:- DEI. HAV EH::ACH I
I
ENV 11~ONME:t,n AI. SEFNICES J
I
43.:1 S. SWINTON AVE r
I
DEL RAY BEF"lCH, FL 33444 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
........ ..- _ _ -... ... -... ........... ... ... "'.. ....... -...... ..' ..... .......- ...... .... .......... ... -... "... -...... .-..... ..-........ .... ..;....... ........... .. ....- -. -.. -. ....... ....... ... - -. .... ..' ........ - ,.. .. .... y.... ,
I
I I
I j
I I
I I
I COMPLETION OF P.O. 531539 PRJ 94-085 MAS1'ER LIFT STATION DEMOLITION ,
I I
I B!D \=l: 94--81 ACe t~ 44251"785366183 I
I I
I I
, I
I $19.800.00 TOTAL BILL.ING I
I f
I -..1. 7 . 820 . 00 PAYMENT THANK YOU
I
J .... - -. - ~... -~......... .,., -.. --.-
I
I 1,980.00 BALANCE DUE
I
I
I \})JJft
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
, ..-'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 01;&./
I
I
,
I
I
I
I r
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
. I
1 I
I J
1 I
I I
, I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
TOTAL. OUE I
$.1980.00 I
I
!
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~.e. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 1995
CONTRACT ADDITION (CHANGE ORDER NO. 8)/MOLLOY BROTHERS,
INC.
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995
This is before the Commission to approve a contract addition
(Change Order No. 8) with Molloy Brothers, Inc. on the Street
Reconstruction and Utility Improvements (Northwest, Northeast)
project. The scope of work includes modification to the Lake Ida
drainage outfall on N. W . 13th Street and additional drainage for
N.W. 17 Street.
Due to reduced quantity adjustments under the original contract,
the net amount of this addition is $0.00. The change is for a 21
calendar day extension of the contract in order to complete the
work.
Recommend approval of the contract addition (Change Order No. 8)
with Molloy Brothers, Inc.
Agenda Item No. f.ff.
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: January 10, 1995
Request to be placed on:
X Regular Agenda
Special Agenda
Workshop Agenda When: January 17, 1995
Description of item (who, what, where, how much) :
Description of item (who. what. where. how much) : Staff requests
City commission approval of a contract addition (CO #8) with Mollv
Brothers. Inc. on the Street Reconstruction & utilitv Improvements
(Northwest. Northeast) (proiect #92-06) . The scope of work
included modification to the Lake Ida drainaqe outfall and
additional drainaqe for NW 17th st. The net total amount of this
contract addition is SO.OO. Also included is a contract time
extension of twenty-one (21 ) calendar days. Fundinq is available
from the Decade of Excellence (Street Reconstruction Ph II) Account
# 228-3162-541-61.19.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YE~RAFT ATTACHED YES~
Recommendation: staff requests approval of Molloy Brothers, Inc.
in the amount of $0.00 and extension of time.
Department head signature: bJ,f/h- 0- ~- ~~~j) /I;LJI'f.~ J,
I · /
Determination of Consistency with comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) :
Budget Director Review (required on all items inVOlving expenditure
of funds):
Funding available: YES/NO
Funding alternatives (if applicable)
AccountNo. & Description
Account Balance
City Manager Review: @/NO t7v1
Approved for agenda:
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Memorandum
To: David T. Harden, city Manager .11
From: William H. Greenwood, Director of Environmental~/k7
Services
Date: January 10, 1995
Re: Contract Addition (C.O. No.8) - Reconstruction and
utility Improvements (Northwest/Northeast) - Project
92-06 Additional drainage for NW 13th st and NW 17th st
Attached is an agenda request for a Contract Addition to Molloy
Brothers, Inc., on the above referenced Project. It provides for
additional drainage on NW 17th st and modifications to the Lake
Ida drainage outfall on NW 13th st. The net amount of this
request is $0.00 utilizing original Contract quantity reduction
adjustments. Also included is a Contract time extension of
twenty-one (21) calendar days for this work.
There is an existing 1811 reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) drainage
outfall to Lake Ida at the west end of NW 13th st. The existing
inflow flume has deteriorated which has reduced the efficiency of
stormwater discharge into Lake Ida. Work included in this
Contract Addition provides for removing the existing
flume;extending the 1811 RCP and installing a new Type E Inlet
adjacent to the edge of pavement on NW 13th st. This
modification will expedite stormwater runoff from NW 13th st to
the outfall. The amount for this scope of work is $4,875.00.
Also included is extending the Contract scope of drainage
to include NW 17th st between NW 2nd Ave and NW 4th Ave to
eliminate existing ponding conditions. Work includes 1811
reinforced concrete piping (RCP), 1811 slotted RCP w/drainfield
and associated swale grading/sodding. This work will be
constructed on a unit price basis utilizing Contract items for a
total of $29,493.00.
Based on estimated as-built final quantities, several individual
Contract items (sodding and RCP) will be under the Contract
quantities upon actual final field measurement. Based on this a
percentage of these quantities is being reduced per this Contract
Addition for a total of -$34,368.00; combined with the additional
work identified above results in a net $0.00 amount for C.O. #8.
Funding is per 228-3162-541-61.19 Decade of Excellence (street
Reconstruction Ph II) .
File: Memo to city Manager
92-06D
A:memo9206
l tJ.UlCI: .:"'~'.o.G ~ ., 1\ ~-
til, ~ ~ ~
~ I
~ ~
~il I
e it:l ,... --.. u
tJ m' r .-.',,",'..<0;.' ,., "
~ ... '. !I !I .. i
gii '" .. LAKE I 8 8" ---
.., ~. i -... . '.
m ... .. -.J\ r---H '
f~[ j 0I~ "j 01, I ' ~\ --. ,~
-~i! l ~ ~ ~
.~. ~ ~
JJ Bli~~ .... 11TH If. IlL. Mntf n ... \8" Sf
~ ~~ u__
~m ) I N IN /7fA
"""II ~! ~-' O~<I! U' .. - · .. _ .
'~I l ,.--..' .... ..... or.
d ~ -
J~ ~ ... ..... Sf.
~f(" ~ ' ...- If. U ,n If
~ I w' ....,...... !II
E ~ __ c.
, ) IDA ( .~..... ,... or. ....,...IT. ~ .. .1lI<
J ~ ....... \NC
C' IJ ~ I
J ' a .... mH It ~ ....... UI. IlL r. MtM
,".~ tJ w /s (;; f7 ; *' = - ~ I
" """! (J<lrfAil .... ,... - ....:~ -- ..r. ,...
., ;: !I !I " ~ -.... ...
1 g g ~ .., "
;.'..I~'~! ~ I : ; i . '"'! 'I .........
~I ! ~. " I ~
I " II " II .. .
. " .." "0 ....
. . InN
I -- - ..... "" or. !II
. ! !II ..
LAKE c' ..r. .....
lAI<E _ ~ !l!
IDA J .. <.
7:rl r .&SIll ~ IDA : I
,. ...r. 111< .
(l ~f/ \NC _ :-~ ~ ~ ~ ....~... - ~ ~ :I .."..........
. I .. I " . I \; -..... -
J · I! III ...
; II .. = .. .. ..
~ .. 01 _ " _ .. " ..
~ .........
+~ Mo. mt IC.
T .... -...a: 4'
./' ti ~ i ~ '''h12J JlOIllI. ... If--. ....... It ~ .....G:jt~j.
..- ... -'~!I'" 'U .f'
~ = - - ! ! ~ II. /,:
" .. ./:r. ........ ...
~ .::....~ c::::::: -" -.- -' .1' I
....._-_!Gw II I: ,t-
__.:::.:::::----., .... Ill. z Ao...ffII" ~ /' I .. - -
I A ......... ----~ L " K E '0" R 0" 0 ~ ~ -...... i :~e> . .
~ . 'c., .~~ ou: 11M n
,~ ..... 111M A'C.
......... N.W. 4tH ST. N. w. ~ 4tH
. ", . ... t 'M .... '~...' ,,' ~I;.
._... ....~.7~.-:::.-:::1.. .. :... ... "....1M Sf.
IJ .
S .! !
-... :
I I I~ ~ ! ! ! !
j = = =
.... _ It - I
." ! . . . '"
;! ~.." ~ ~ i
"lI ! ~ ~ ~ .... 'I
~ ~ ~ 0
! ~
t !..... _ or.! .. _ If, u.& _,
...,. ;0,
~ I : ~ I - .~
" I! ~ ~ rF
I g" . i ~ '. : ~ i
t..... ........
-.. -.".....---...--. - .-...--...--.. -_.-.---_._~ --_. -'
I S':'A ',-n. '" ". ~
I c-'
- "."
I I ,. JON ~
Cd IJ.JOl:
~ f1.JO SWI'
~ I' I ~
Q
Cd
:>C I . I
j
, . . .,
. I- L i;;':~ .J-_.
.
'0.00_ ,
. -
T':~ "
~ ..
.
. .-
... .t- . _~.". 4lh~VJo~
II +00 - . - - --"ii.oo--
101....1... ~ . I.J~ . I
, .i_' .... ;...~~. '''.'.- ( . ."
~~ - - - -1-- -
I' . . ,.' , I
, . '. '. fo.. l .
,. :
, ' :
,:
!
I
. I
..
::::: g
/.
~ -
Z I.
I I~
-- \'
.....::;J .. . ~
J:
t~ .. .. ::i
~ I . ~
"---' ~ 1
~ .. ..
"!
- -.
"': r... ~, .
D
~
2- !
~ :
C"'-. ;
~
~ I
..
0
~
~ ,
.
, 1
... -
" I I
I
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
CHANGE ORDER TO ORIGINAL CONTRACT
CHANGE NO. 8 PR.O:JEJ.[' NO. 92-06 DATE:
~ TITLE: street Reconstruction an:i utility Inprovements (Northwest, Northeast)
'ID <X>N'IRACIOR: Molloy Brothers, Inc.
YOU ARE HEREBY REtlUESTED 'ID MAKE 'IHE FOli.CMING CHANGES lli 'IHE PlANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THIS ~ AND 'ID PERFORM 'IHE \\OR!< ACOORDINGLY, SUB:J'Ecr' 'ID ALL <X>N'IRAcr STIPUIATIONS AND
<X>VENANTS.
JUsrIFICATION:
1. COnstruct storm drainage modifications at the Lake Ida drainage outfall at the west
em of NW 13th st.
2. COnstruct additional storm drainage on NW 17th st an:i NW 4th Ave per plans by CDB
Enviromnental Services Department sheets 1-2.
-All work to be canpleted on a unit price basis as per attached Schedule IIAII
based on actual field measured quantities.
SUMMARY OF <X>N'IRAcr AM:>UNI'
ORIGINAL <X>NTRAcr AM:>UNI' $1,025,935.00
<X>ST OF <X>Ns.rRUCTION CHANGES PREVIOUSLY ORDERED $ 234,612.25
ADJUSI'ED <X>NTRAcr AM:>UNI' PRIOR 'ID. THIS CHANGE ORDER $1,260,547.25
<X>ST OF <X>Ns.rRUCTION CHANGES THIS ORDER $ 0.00
ADJUSI'ED <X>NTRAcr AM:>UNI' lliCllJDING THIS mANGE ORDER $1,260,547.25
PER cmr lliCRFASE THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 %
'lOI'AL PER cmr lliCRFASE 'ID DATE 22.8%
COntract time extended twenty-one (21) calendar days for this work
CERI'IFIED STATEMENT: I hereby certify that the supporting cost data included is, in my
considered opinion, accurate
for Molloy Brothers, Inc.
'ID BE FILLED our BY DEPARIMENl' INITIATING mANGE ORDER
Furrling SOUrce 228-3162-541-61.19 Decade of Excellence (street Reconstruction Ph II)
DEmAY BEACH, FIDRIDA by its city Corranission
REX:XJo1MEND : ~~~ t/t4e~ By:
william H. Greenwood, Director 'Ihomas E. Lynch, Mayor
of Envirornnental Services
A'ITFSl' :
APPROVED: By:
City Attorney city Clerk
Street Reconstruction and Utility Improvements
Northwest, Northeast
Project No. 92-06
Change Order #8
NW 13th St/NW 17th St Storm Drainage Improvements
Schedule "A"
Contract Item Description +/- C.O. Unit Total
Item No. #8 Qty Price
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Construct drainage modification at the outfaLL
Located at the west end of NW 13th St (Lake Ida).
--Remove existing flllllE!;tie-in to existing 18" RCP;
install 16 L f of 18" RCP; install Type E InLet;
construct paved apron connection to NW 13th St
edge of pavement. 1 Ls $4,875.00 $4,875.00
---------------------------
Subtotal $4,875.00
II. Construct additionaL storm drainage on NW 17th St
and tie-in to storm drainage being constructed
at the intersection of NW 4th Ave and Lake Ave.
(constructed per pLans titled "NW 17th Street
Drainage Improvements" sheets 1-2)
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 Ls $500.00 $500.00
2 CLear & Grub 1 Ls $1,200.00 $1,200.00
3 Remove Pavement 1 Ls $1,100.00 $1,100.00
6 Pavement Repair 379 sy $7.00 $2,653.00
8 AsphaLt Driveway 20 sy $10.00 $200.00
9 6" Concrete Driveway 30 sy $23.00 $690.00
-- Concrete Apron for Inlet 4 sy $23.00 $92.00
23 Grade SwaLes 1 Ls $1,500.00 $1,500.00
25 InstaL L Sod 450 sy $1.50 $675.00
26 Type "c" InLet w/apron 4 ea $1,250.00 $5,000.00
31 18" RCP 227 lf $35.00 $7,945.00
-- 18" SLotted RCP w/DrainfieLd 162 Lf $49.00 $7,938.00
---------------------------
SubtotaL $29,493.00
III. Contract unit price item quantity adjustments per
estimated finaL as-built reductions.
26 InstaL L Sod -17245.33 sy $1.50 ($25,868.00)
31 18" RCP -100 Lf $35.00 ($3,500.00)
32 24" SLotted RCP w/DrainfieLd -100 L f $50.00 ($5,000.00)
---------------------------
Subtotal ($34.368.00)
-----------..
Net Amount of Change Order #8 $0.00
------------
------------
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i F.;:. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
RATIFICATION OF APPROVAL/AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS UNDER
"DELRAY BEACH RENAISSANCE":
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
This is before the Commission to formally approve and endorse the
coordinated delivery of affordable housing in the City of Delray
Beach to low and moderate income households under the "Delray Beach
Renaissance" program, with authorization to jointly submit
applications to the State, Federal Home Loan Bank and various
philanthropic organizations in order to leverage dollars available
in existing programs and resources.
Details are outlined in the support documentation. At the January
10, 1995, workshop meeting, it was the consensus of the Commission
to support the program.
Recommend approval of the "Delray Beach Renaissance" Affordable
Housing Programs.
ref:agmem06
IIBHORANDOM
,1
.
TO: DAVID HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
~ COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT !P
. FROM: LULA BUTLER, DIRECTOR,
U: COORDINATION OP Al"PORDABLB ROUSING PROGRAMS ONDBR ORB
tJKBRBLLA CALLBD THB -DBLRAY BBACH IlBNAISSANCBII
DATE: JANUARY 4, 1995
I'l'BH BBPORB ftB COHHISSION:
Consideration of a proposed coordinated approach to the delivery
of affordable housing within the City of Delray Beach and
authorization to submit applications to the State, Federal Horne
Loan Bank and philanthropic sources to create a pool of
subsidies, leveraging dollars currently administered by the City
and partners represented in this program.
BACKGROt7ND:
Staff invited all local housing providers to a round table
discussion to determine if there was interest to create a
coordinated partnership under the umbrella of the City for the
delivery of affordable housing within a defined target area,
addressing the needs of low and moderate income households. This
action was pursuant to a recommendation under the Visions 2005
Assembly report as adopted by the City Commission. The following
partners have been meeting on a bi-weekly basis with City staff
since October 1994:
Consortium For Affordable Horne Financing, Inc -
Art Fleming
Community Redevelopment Agency ( eRA) -
Chris Brown, Sherry Johnson
Delray Beach Housing Authority - Deborah Castello
The TED Center - Sam McGhee
Delray Beach CDC - Amefika Gueka, Tommy Stevens
Fred Griffin Construction, Inc. - Fred Griffin
The consensus of the housing providers is that there is
sufficient interest and resources available to develop a
comprehensive and coordinated approach to the delivery of
affordable housing in Delray Beach. The partnership will be
known as the -Delray Beach Renaissance- with the Community
Improvement Department as the lead entity responsible for overall
coordination and administration.
Ns..3.
. Delray Renaissance
City Commission - 1/10/95
Page 2
.
The Delray Renaissance has a goal to provide one hundred (100)
homes ( 75 units of new construction and 25 units under the
acquisition and/or rehabilitation of existing units) over a
two-year period (fiscal years 1996 and 1997). It is estimated
that a total of $6.2 million will be needed to fully fund a
four-component, comprehensive program.
In order to leverage dollars available in existing programs and
resources, we are proposing to submit applications to the Federal
Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, State HOME program, Palm Beach County
Housing Trust Funds and possible philanthropic organizations.
The four-component program is as follows:
1. New construction/Acquisition/Rehabilitation - infill
housing on existing vacant lots within the CDBG target area
and the acquisition/rehabilitation of existing units.
2. Job Training/Business Incubator - agreements with local
vocational schools to develop building trades apprentice or
training programs geared toward new construction activities.
3 . Community Stabilization - incorporates the City's
bootstrap, neighborhood association and Community Oriented
Code Enforcement Programs.
4. Credit/Title Repair - Provides for the creation and
implementation of on-going programs requiring attendance to
workshops designed to assist in the repair of individual
credit. Title Repair involves creating properties that can
be developed through the eRA to ensure good marketable
titles on properties that historically have been impaired
with title deficiencies.
Subsidy commitments that have been identified are as follows:
Community Redevelopment Agency ( eRA) $ 100,000
Delray Beach Housing Authority 60,000
City of Delray Beach 745,000
Consortium for Affordable Housing, Inc. 4,715,000
Total commitments from partners $5,620,000
Competitive Grant Applications Required:
Federal Home Loan Bank 240,000
State HOME 160,000
LISC 100,000
Palm Beach County Housing Trusts Funds 80,000
Total competitive grant applications $ 580,000
Delray Renaissance
. City Commission - 1/10/95
Page 3
The Delray Renaissance Program is scheduled to be implemented
beginning October 1, 1995. Our application to the Federal Horne
Loan Bank is due January 17, 1995. Other grant applications will
be submitted between February and June, 1995.
RBCOHHBNDATION:
Staff is recommending City Commission endorsement of the
coordinated delivery of affordable housing to the City of Delray
Beach's low and moderate income households as proposed under the
-Delray Beach Renaissance- Program and authorize the joint
submission of competitive grant applications as identified to
leverage program dollars.
LB:DQ
DQ3
DBRenai.LB
. .
.
~
CITY OF DBLJlAY BBACH
AFFORDABLB HOOSING PROGRAMS
DBTAILBD BRBAK-O'OT OF J'O'N'DING COIIKI'l'KBNTS
DBLJlAY BBACH RBNAISSANCB
FISCAL YEAR 1995/96
SHIP (STATE DOLLARS) $100,000
HOME (PALM BEACH CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT) 250,000
BOOTSTRAP 22,500
FISCAL YEAR 1996/97
SHIP (STATE DOLLARS) $150,000
HOME (PALM BEACH CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT) 200,000
BOOTSTRAP PROGRAM 22,500
TOTAL FOND PROJECTED $745,000
.,
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i . G. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
RATIFICATION OF APPROVAL/DUNE REVEGETATION PROGRAM
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
This is before the Commission to formally approve the Dune
Revegetation Program for the west side of the dune along the
municipal beach. At the January 10th workshop, it was the
consensus of the Commission to support the program as outlined in
the support documentation.
Recommend approval of the Dune Revegetation Program.
~ on~
ref:agmem09
:)1\
. - . ~
.\ . .
. ,
'. CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION
.
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
t'OiJrJ
flI fOIL 'I'
FROM: Joe Weldon, Director of Parks and~t~~
John Walker, Project Coordinator
SUBJECT: WORK SHOP MEETING OF JANUARY 10, 1995
DUNE REVEGETATION PROGRAM
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE CITY COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is to give
direction on a plan to revegetate the west side of the dune
along the Municipal Beach.
BACKGROUND:
Staff has prepared a plan and program to revegetate the dune
along the Municipal Beach. The plantings will replicate a
natural species diversity, be aesthetically pleasing with
varying color shades and textures, be low maintenance and
accommodate view lines to the ocean.
The beach is one of our most important economic and
environmental resources. Delray Beach has committed significant
energies to maintaining this resource:
* The beach nourishment project maintains storm protection
and recreational beach.
* Beach cleaning services maintain a clean and desirable
sandy beach.
* Lifeguard services provide safety to the beach goers.
* The volleyball area, surfing area, sailboat area, and
cabana concession add convenient amenities for different
user groups.
* Overall landscape maintenance adds aesthetic beauty.
Even with this list of successes, some deterioration has
occurred in a part of the dune.
WS.1
. .
..... . .
. . When the initial dune was created in 1974, the planting used was
mainly beachberry. At the time, this plant was considered fine
as a dune plant. Over time, we have learned several drawbacks
to the beachberry.
* It is a high maintenance planting. Beachberry grows
quickly and requires frequent pruning to maintain a constant
good appearance. Due to funding constraints, we prune
yearly, so the planting is either tall and leggy or cropped
and bare for much of the time.
* It has a long-term root virus that kills individual plants.
This leaves bare spots which are easily invaded by weeds.
* It is not a native beach plant, but an invasive exotic
which is no longer allowed to be planted in the dune.
This constitutes the problem. As seen in the attached report,
the solution is to remove the beachberry and replace it with
native species. The area involved is the length of the
Municipal Beach, from the dune crest west to the toe of the
dune. The goals are:
* To replicate a natural dune using a diversity of native
dune species.
* To select plants for low maintenance and no irrigation
requirements.
* To remove invasive exotics.
* To provide view lines to the ocean and partial screening of
artificial lights by alternating areas of lower and higher
growing species to produce an undulating canopy along ~he dune
crest.
* To revegetate using City forces over an extended period
(three years or more) to allow work to be completed without
disturbing dune stability or aesthetics.
The plan to meet these goals was developed by Robert Barron, a
coastal management expert and Delray Beach resident. Rob
donated his time and knowledge both to produce the final plan
and advise us on plant selection.
As a first phase, we propose to revegetate the area from the
main pavilion to north of the flagpole (about 250'). This will
be a "demonstration block" to judge the success of the plan.
Thereafter, we will work through the length of the area in
modules about 50' long (two days labor). In this way, the
impact will be gradual and the dune appearance will not suffer
from large bare patches.
.
"
. .
.
The total budget for the project is $60,000. As noted in the
report, funds are available from the Beach Restoration Fund. We
have a funding contract with the State which allows 66%
($39,600.) to be reimbursed. Funds expended for materials and
supplies, and salaries and benefits are eligible for
reimbursement.
T:\advanced\REVEG2.DOC
.
'\. .
.
DUNE REVEGETATION PROGRAM
INTRODUCTION
This report addresses the dune along the Municipal Beach. Part
of that dune, from the dune crest west to the west toe of the
dune, is in need of revegetation. The main plant type,
beachberry (Scaevola frutescens) is no longer an acceptable
species. In addition, the area has experienced plant losses due
to disease, leaving bare patches. A plan and program should be
developed to replace the beachberry with a diversity of scrub
zone species.
Beach dunes and vegetation are part of the overall erosion
control mechanism on the coast. Sand which forms the dune is
trapped by vegetation; dune provide a source of sand to act as a
buffer to storm-driven erosion. The system acts as a shock
absorber to protect upland property from storm damage.
In addition to their role in erosion control, coastal vegetation
provides natural beauty and habitat for coastal animals. In
Delray beach, vegetation can aid the survival of sea turtles by
partially screening artificial lights creating the background
glow of the City.
Pristine dune vegetation is roughly divided into zones of
habitat. From seaward to landward, these are:
Pioneer Zone - seaward of the dune crest, dominated by
grasses such as sea oats, and vines.
Scrub Zone - on the landward side of the dune, made
up of salt-tolerant shrubs and small
trees.
Forest Zone - upland of the dune, consisting of hardwood
trees and pines.
In Delay Beach, only the pioneer and scrub zones are
represented.
PROJECT HISTORY
Prior to 1973, no dune existed along the Municipal Beach.
Erosion had destroyed both the dune and beach, offering little
storm protection and only a marginal recreation beach.
In 1973, the City constructed an initial beach restoration.
Nourishment projects in 1978, 1984 and 1992 have maintained this
beach to provide both storm protection and recreation.
The City began a program of dune reconstruction and maintenance
in 1974. Using vegetation consisting of beachberry (scaevola
frutescens) and sand fencing, several feet of wind-blown sand
. ,."
J'
.... .
. .
were trapped to form the beginnings of a dune. Over the next
several years the dune continued to grow and kept most of the
sand from blowing onto the sidewalk.
Two improvements were constructed in 1980. Additional
vegetation, including beachberry and seagrape (Cocoloba unifera)
were planted to angle pedestrian access points to the southeast.
This further reduced the amount of wind-blown sand reaching the
sidewalk. In addition, two rows of sand fence were placed
seaward of the dune to create a foredune and slow accretion of
the primary dune.
In 1982, sea oats (Uniola paniculata) were planted between the
sand fences and original dune. The sea oats have been
successful in expanding the foredune. Sand fences and sea oats
have also kept foot traffic to a minimum in the dune area,
allowing many species of native vegetation to grow.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The pioneer zone seaward of the dune is dominated by sea oats
with a large variety of native vines and grasses. Sea grapes
are largely confined to the pedestrian access points.
The dune crest and back dune are dominated by beachberry, an
ornamental species now considered an invasive exotic. In recent
years, the beachberry has suffered from a root virus and stress
due to cold weather. Where plantings have died out, they have
been replaced with sea oats and Pittosporum tobia. Upland
species, especially weeds, have invaded stressed areas.
PROPOSED REVEGETATION PROGRAM
The proposed revegetation program would, over time, replace the
beachberry and other exotics with a variety of native dune
species. The project area is from the crest of the dune west to
the west toe of the dune, and from Casaurina Road to the north
end of the Municipal Beach. Revegetation would take place over
about a three year period so that the dune will never exhibit a
bare look or become unstable.
Parameters or the program will be as follows:
* Dune plantings will replicate the pioneer and scrub zones
of a pristine dune. This will require a broad diversity of
species to be installed.
* All plantings in the dune area will be native to the
pioneer and scrub zones.
* Species selected will be low maintenance and require no
irrigation.
~ ,.. .
~ . .
. .\" . '
.
. .
* Invasive exotics, as listed in the Coastal , Protection
Ordinance ('34-90) will be removed from the pioneer and
scrub zones. Planting and pruning practices will be in
accordance with the guidelines in the Ordinance.
* Dune vegetation will seek to provide view lines to the
ocean and partial screening of artificial lighting to
protect sea turtles. This can be accomplished by
alternating areas of lower and higher growing species to
produce an undulating canopy along the dune crest.
* In the pioneer zone, little work is needed. It is
sufficient to remove invasive exotics and fill any sparse
areas with native species.
* Replanting in the scrub zone will be accomplished using
City forces, working over a long time period of about three
years. This will allow work to be completed without
disturbing dune stability or aesthetics - a large extent of
bare dune will not be allowed.
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The project area is seaward of the Coastal Construction Control
Line and is under the jurisdiction of the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection. Since this is a maintenance project,
it is possible to get an exemption from permitting.
FUNDING
The City's reimbursement contract with the State includes a line
item for dune revegetation. The total budget is $60,000, of
which the State will reimburse $39,600 (66%). The remaining
share, $20,400 (34%) would be paid by the City. Funds are
available in the Beach Restoration Fund. The terms of the
contract allow the State to reimburse direct labor costs
including wages and benefits, direct material purchases, stock
material cost, and contractual services.
DESIGN
Design will consist of the development of a modular design and
planting plan. Design services will be provided through the
Planning and Zoning Department. Robert Barron (Coastal
Management and Consulting) has offered fifteen hours of design
and drafting on a volunteer basis. Parks and Recreation
Department and the City Horticulturist will be consulted
throughout the design process.
T:\advanced\REVEGl.DOC
,A, 1
")A
C/V
[IT' DF DELIA' BEA[H
DElRA Y BEACH
f lOR In...
~ 100 N,W. 1 sl AVENUE. DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 . 407/243-7000
A11.AmericaCity
, III J! MEMORANDUM
1993
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
FROM: r~Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # CITY COMMISSION MEETING 1/17/95
APPROVAL ADOPT-A-HIGHWAY PROGRAM
DATE: January 11, 1995
ACTION
City Commission is requested to formally approve a City sponsored
"Adopt-A-Highway Program."
BACKGROUND
It was the consensus of the Commission at your Workshop on 1/10/95 to proceed
with this program with the following parameters as amended:
. Application through Community Improvement
. Minimum 1/2 mile
. Clean once per month
. Designate person to head up the group and attend a safety class
. Develop and execute a contract
. Develop sign with group's name similar to County sign
. City supply safety vests and signs
. Require $100 fee from for-profit-businesses to cover cost
. No more than two signs per area designated
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval.
RAB:kwg
File:g:agenda
Doc,:Adopta.hwy
@ Pnnted on Recycled Pape' THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS f.lI-
"
'.
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER p;v{
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # Z .T. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
REVISED POLICE AND FIRE COMMUNICATIONS AGREEMENT WITH
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995
Since June 15, 1988, the City of Delray Beach and the Town of
Gulfstream have had an agreement where the City provides Police and
Fire dispatching and communications services to Gulfstream. The
agreement before you replaces the previous one which expired on
June 15, 1994, but was extended through January 15, 1995, to allow
sufficient time to complete negotiations for a revised agreement.
The new agreement is to become effective as of January 15, 1995,
and will terminate on September 30, 1998. Changes in the agreement
include the following:
( 1 ) Gulfstream has paid an annual service fee of $20,000 since the
inception of the agreement in 1988. This continues until
October 1, 1995, when the fee will increase to $23,956.00.
This increase is based on changes in the Consumer Price Index
(CPI) since our first agreement. The agreement also includes
a provision for adjusting the fee in subsequent years based on
changes in the CPl.
(2 ) New sections are added establishing performance standards for
our services and providing for monthly reports which we will
supply to Gulfstream.
(3 ) Lastly, a section has been added which specifies how
complaints are to be resolved.
Recommend approval of the revised Police and Fire Communications
Agreement between the City and the Town of Gulfstream.
ref:agmemo13
'.
POLICE AND FIRE COMMUNICATIONS AGREEMENT
TIDS AGREEMENT, entered into this _ day of , 1995, by
and between the CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "City" and the TOWN OF GULF STREAM, a Florida municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Town".
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, the Town desires to enter into an agreement with the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, in order to obtain Police and Fire Dispatching and Communications Services
from the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Town in consideration of the mutual promises
and benefits hereby agree as follows;
Section 1. Effective Date. This agreement is to become effective as of January 15,
1995.
Section 2. Termination Date. This agreement shall expire, and terminate on
September 30, 1998.
Section 3. Payment of Service Fee.
A. The Town shall pay a service fee of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) per
year to the City for Police Dispatching and Communications Services provided to the Town
from the City, prorated for the period of January 15, 1995 through September 30, 1995. For
the. year commencing October 1, 1995, and ending September 30, 1996, the payment shall be
Twenty Three Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-Six Dollars ($23,956.00).
B. For each subsequent year, until the termination date, the Town of Gulf Stream
and the City of Delray Beach agree that the service fee shall be adjusted annually from the
prior year's service fee. The adjustment shall be based on the "All Urban Consumers - United
States" April Consumer Price Index (CPI). The projected annual service fee adjustment will
be reported to the Town Manager of the Town of Gulf Stream on or before July 15th of each
year.
Section 4. City's Responsibilities; The City shall provide dispatching and
communication services to include the handling of:
a. Radio dispatching of police, fIre and Emergency Medical Services
.
(EMS) emergency and 911 calls.
b. Radio dispatching of non-emergency calls.
c. Delray Beach Communications Dispatch will dispatch a Gulf Stream
police officer to all fIre and medical calls. If a Gulf Stream officer is unavailable due
to another priority call, he will be made aware of the fIre or medical call and its
location.
d. Electronically recording and maintaining radio transmissions for thirty
(30) days.
e. Access to information from Palm Beach Sheriff s Department's
P.A.L.M.S. Computer System and the State F.C.I.C. and Federal N.C.I.C. Computer
Systems via radio or telephone voice transmission.
2
f. Recording and maintaining for two years a daily dispatch log and
Incident Report Cards to be issued a numerical identifier and contain the following
information:
1. Type of call or incident
2. Date and time of call or incident
3. Location of incident
4. Complainant or caller's name
5. Name of the assigned or responding officer
Section 5. Performance Standards.
A. Definitions:
The following definitions shall apply for purposes of this agreement:
Emergency Calls - includes 911 calls and all other calls where life or property
in Gulf Stream are believed to be in eminent danger, including all fire and burglar
alarm calls.
Non-Emergency Calls - includes all other calls for services in Gulf Stream
where life or property are not believed to be in eminent danger. These include reports
of suspicious activities or persons, requests to speak with an officer, relay of
information to an officer where the information is not related to an existing emergency
situation, and similar types of calls.
B. Dispatch Times:
Emergency calls should be dispatched within 60 seconds or less. Non-emergency calls
should be dispatched within three (3) to five (5) minutes. These times shall be measured from
3
the time a call is received by the dispatch center to the time the dispatch center notifies Gulf
Stream police personnel.
The dispatch times stated above shall be the expected performance standards under this
agreement. However, both parties recognize that exceptions to these times may be required
periodically. Accordingly, it is not the intention of this agreement that a failure to dispatch a
call within the stated time period be regarded as breach of this agreement. Rather, it is the
intention of this agreement that all exceptions to the state times be reviewed and all necessary
and appropriate follow-up actions be taken to prevent future exceptions, where they can be
avoided.
The above notwithstanding, nothing in this section shall release either party from the
provisions of Section 12 of this agreement where dispatch times are concerned.
C. Monthly Reports:
At least once each month, the City shall generate and deliver to the Town a Dispatch
Activity Report listing all Gulf Stream calls from the date of the previous report. The report
shall include the times that all calls were received, the times they were dispatched, the times
the police officer and/or Fire Department arrived on the scene, and the time the call was
cleared. At present, all times are reported in minutes; however, it is anticipated that prior to
March 1, 1995, the City shall begin reporting times in minutes and seconds.
In addition to the Dispatch Activity Report, at least once each month the City shall also
generate and deliver to the Town an Exceptions Report. The Exceptions Report shall include
a list of all Gulf Stream calls that were not dispatched within the time periods specified herein,
4
a written explanation stating the cause of the delay and the actions, if any, taken to prevent the
delay from reoccurring.
Section 6. Service Complaints. In the event a service complaint is received, the
complaint shall be handled pursuant to one of the following resolution processes:
A. Informal Resolution Process: Informal Service questions, problems or
complaints by either party may be initiated via a face-to-face meeting, telephone
conversation, facsimile transmission or in writing. The recipient of the question or
complaint shall then respond in a like fashion or in a manner otherwise agreed to at the
time the question or complaint is initiated. A reasonable response time also shall be
agreed to at the time of initiation.
Questions and complaints directed to the Town of Gulf Stream shall be directed
only to the Chief of Police or Deputy Chief of Police. Questions and complaints
directed to the City of Delray Beach shall be directed only to the Police Department's
Systems Manager or Director of Support Services. Further, it shall be the
responsibility of the recipient to personally respond to the initiator unless an0ther
respondent is agreed to at the time of initiation.
B. Formal Resolution Process: Formal service questions, problems or
complaints by either party shall be made in writing on forms provided by the City.
Within three (3) working days of receipt of a compliant, the complaint shall be fully
reviewed and a response rendered noting the corrective actions taken, if any. To
expedite resolution of a compliant, both the initial complaint from and the response
5
may be. sent via facsimile transmission. Complaints and responses shall only be
addressed to and from the following individuals:
City of Delray Beach Police Director of Support Services
300 West Atlantic Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Town of Gulf Stream; Chief of Police
100 Sea Road
Gulf Stream, Florida 33444
Section 7. Meetings. At least once every three (3) months, the City Police Director of
Support Services and the Town Chief of Police shall, unless they both agree that a meeting is
not needed, meet to discuss the services provided under this agreement and any issues, past,
pending or anticipated, associated therewith.
At least once each year, the City Police Director of Support Services and the Town
Chief of Police shall meet to review and discuss the terms of this agreement and to recommend
to their respective City/Town Manager any revisions, additions or deletions. This meeting
may be held as one of the above specified quarterly meetings.
Upon mutual agreement, the City/Town Managers may change the provisions of
Sections 5, 6 and 7 (performance Standards, Service Complaints, Meetings). No other
provisions of this agreement may be amended without the approval of the governing bodies of
both parties.
Nothing in this section or agreement shall prohibit or discourage additional meetings as
may be necessary or desired by either party from time to time. In addition, nothing herein
shall prohibit or discourage meetings between staff members of both parties other than those
6
specifically referenced in this agreement. However, no staff member of either part may
interpret. revise. amend or delete any provision of this agreement except as provided herein.
Section 8. Investigations, Discussion and Negotiation for Future
Communications Operations.
Both parties recognize and agree that internal and external influences may cause the
City to investigate and pursue alternative communications operations including. but not limited
to. sharing. merging or transferring operations with another community or entity. the City
agrees to inform the town of all ongoing investigations. discussions and negotiations
concerning alternative communications operations and invites the Town to fully participate in
same. Further, the City hereby agrees that it will not pursue alternative communications
operations that would not include the Town without the written consent from the Town
Manager.
Section 9. Renewal Notice. Within sixty (60) days of the expiration of this
agreement. both parties shall inform the other in writing as to whether they intend to renew
this agreement.
Section 10. Town's Responsibilities. The Town shall be responsible for maintenance
of all radios or equipment purchased after the execution of the original agreement, providing
maintenance and repairs as needed through a Motorola subcontractor.
Section 11. Additional Services. The City shall provide only communication services
and dispatching services except that the City may unilaterally add any communications.
dispatch. information or record keeping services that enhances the City's ability to provide that
service to its own service area.
7
The Town shall conform to those procedures and policy necessary to assure that the
communications and records keeping for the Town's services area is in harmony with the
communications and records keeping of the City.
In the event that the City is capable of providing enhancements or additions to law
enforcement and communications services which are not unilateral and the Town wishes to
avail themselves of such additions and enhancements the Town may, upon mutual agreement
with the City, amend Section 4 of this agreement which may necessitate a negotiated
amendment by the City to Section 3 of this agreement.
Section 12. Hold Harmless. The City, its officials, agents, or employees in providing
dispatch and communication services, shall not be deemed to assume any liability for acts,
omissions, or negligence of the Town, its employees, agents or officials. In consideration of
the payment of Ten Dollars ($10.00), receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Town
shall hold the City harmless and shall defend them against any claims for damages resulting
from acts, omissions or negligence of the Town, its officials, agents, or employees, subject to
the provisions of Florida Statutes Section 768.28. All liability for injury to personnel and for
loss of or damage of equipment incurred in connection with this agreement, or in the
performance of services or functions pursuant thereto, shall be borne by the City or the Town
employing such personnel or owning such equipment, and the Town shall carry sufficient
insurance to cover all such liabilities.
Section 13. Termination of Agreement by the Town. The Town may terminate this
agreement at any time following sixty (60) days written notice to the City. After the effective
date of said notice, both parties will be relieved of any further obligations under this
8
.
agreement except nothing herein shall be construed to impair the obligation of any contract
then in effect in which the Town and the City is a party or to relieve the Town or the City of
any liability for its negligence or the negligence of their respective employed occurring while
this agreement is in effect. If the Town should terminate the agreement as herein provided and
prior to September 30, 1998, the applicable payment referred to in Section 3 shall be refunded
on a pro rate basis.
Section 14. Termination of Agreement by the City. The City may terminate this
agreement at any time following sixty (60) days written notice to the Town. After the
effective date of said notice, both parities will be relieved of any further obligations under this
agreement except nothing herein shall be construed to impair the obligation of any contract
then in effect in which the Town and the City is a party or to relieve the Town or the City of
any liability for its negligence or the negligence of their respective employees occurring while
this agreement is in effect. If the City should terminate this agreement as herein provided and
prior to September 30, 1998, the applicable payment referred to in Section 3 shall be refunded
on a pro rata basis.
Section 15. Agreement Not Assignable.. The Town shall not assign this agreement.
Section 16. Venue. All disputes arising from this agreement shall be settled in a court
of competent jurisdiction with venue to be in Palm Beach County, Florida.
Section 17. Notices. All notices provided for in this agreement shall be in writing and
either hand delivered or sent by certified or registered mail to the party to be notified at the
following respective addresses which may be changed by written notice only:
9
City: Office of the City Manager
City of Delray Beach, Florida
100 N.W. 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Town: Office of the Town Manager
Town of Gulf Stream
100 Sea Road
Gulf Stream, Florida 33444
Notice given by or to the attorney by either party shall be as effective as if given by or
to said party.
Section 18. City Retains Exclusive Control. The City shall retain exclusive control
over all equipment and personnel used in providing the services in accordance with this
agreement.
Section 19. City's Rigbt to Limit Access. The City shall have the right to limit,
direct or deny access, to individual representatives of the Town, to Information and
Communications capabilities provided in Section _, when such access has been used, in
violation of Florida Statutes, in violation of the city, county, state or national directives and
procedures governing the acquiring use of sensitive information and equipment, or when such
access may jeopardize the City's law enforcement effort or the representative is found to be a
security risk.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be signed by the
duly authorized officers on this day of , 1995.
ATTEST: CITY OF DELAY BEACH, FLORIDA
By;
City Clerk Thomas Lynch, Mayor
10
.
.
Approved as to Form;
City Attorney
ATTEST: TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA
By:
Town Clerk Mayor
11
" . . . c-/;t
~1
[ITY DF DELRRY BER[H
DElRAY BEACH
f l 0 . IDA.
tI*d 100 N,W, 1st AVENUE. DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 . 407/243-7000
A11.America City
, 'III! MEMORANDUM
1993
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
FROM: ~ Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # CITY COMMISSION MEETING 1/17/95
APPROVE RESOLUTION # Jf-9S LOADING ZONE
DATE: January 11, 1995
ACTION
City Commission is requested to approve Resolution #J./-95, a request to FOOT to
designate two parking spaces on the south side of Atlantic Avenue, just east of
Salina Avenue, as a loading zone from 8:00 a.m. to -1--:00 p.m., Monday through
Saturday. II :00 a..m. (tfo;.s'CD)
BACKGROUND
A request was received through the Planning and Zoning Director from 6 South
Restaurant to designate these two parking spaces as a loading zone for specific
times. A request was made to FOOT. They have agreed to this designation but
require a resolution from City Commission.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval. Lfllrwul fa ~ 9./lfl.
RAB:kwg ~ UJdL ~ Acxvuv
~a..m. tb 11:00 a..m.
'-/1:&/
File:g:agenda (1llcu.;t57 ~17t6u
Doc.:6South,Res
~)
@ Printed on Recycled Paper THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS ~.f
I
)
RESOLUTION NO. 4-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REQUESTING THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO APPROVE A CITY
REQUEST TO DESIGNATE TWO PARKING SPACES ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF ATLANTIC AVENUE (STATE ROAD 806), JUST EAST
OF THE SALINA AVENUE INTERSECTION, AS A LOADING ZONE
FROM 8:00 A.M. TO 11:00 A.M. , MONDAY THROUGH
SATURDAY.
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach, Florida, has requested
the District Traffic Operations Engineer of the Florida Department of
Transportation (FOOT) to approve a City request to designate two (2 )
parking spaces on the south side of Atlantic Avenue (State Road 806),
just east of the Salina Avenue intersection, as a loading zone from
8:00(a.m. to 11:00 a.m., Monday through Saturday; and
WHEREAS, in support of the request, the City of Delray Beach
has made the finding that there is a need to provide such loading zone
to provide for traffic safety.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City Commission of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, formally requests the District Traffic Operations
Engineer of the Department of Transportation of the State of Florida
to approve the City's request to designate two (2 ) parking spaces on
the south side of Atlantic Avenue (State Road 806), just east of the
Salina Avenue intersection, as a loading zone from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00
a.m., Monday through Saturday.
Section 2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to
furnish a certified copy of this Resolution to the District Traffic
Operations Engineer of the Department of Transportation of the State
of Florida.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 17th day
of January, 1995.
f/4,c~
MAY
ATTEST:
() !/MmiYf/' Jv W' JlmIy
ity C rk
.... , .. ...
~ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
-
LAlIfTO/'l cnlLVi - BL~ Ct. WATTS
-
C:;O~R/'lOK -- Sf:CIU'TA.RY
-
-
-.-: West Palm Beach Operations Center-District -4
'"P 7900 Fo,est Hill Bouleve,d
West Palm Beech, Flo,ida 33413-3342
Telaphone (407: 434-391 B: FAX 434 3929
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC OPERATIONS
December 19, 1994
Mr. Richard Corwin
Deputy Director-Public Works Rr::-r>-
City of Delray Beach '- L... . .' ~.~ ~\ - >. >J ? 7 1994
100 NW 1 st. Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Dear Mr. Corwin:
SUBJECT: STATE SECTION 93030; STATE ROAD 806
A T SALINA A VENUE, CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH,
PALM BEACH COUNTY
REQUEST FOR LOADING ZONE
This is pursuant to our letter dated November 1, 1994 regarding the subject
location and your request for a loading zone.
The Department has reviewed your request and approves the use of a loading zone
at the subject location. However, we will need a resolution from the City to change
the type of parking. Upon receipt of the approved resolution, we will permit you to
change the posted signs.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at
(407) 434-3918 EXT 121 .
Sincerely,
111~
Traffic Operations Engineer
MM/jas
cc: Mark Plass, F.D.O.T
Tracy Empfield, F.D.O.T
Tom Driscoll, F.D.O.T.
File
RECYCLED PAPER *
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~.K.. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 1995
AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995
This is before the Commission to approve the award of the
following bids and contracts:
1. Bid Award - to Networks, for the purchase of two
Uninterruptable Power Source (UPS) units for the gas
chromatograph and atomic absorption test equipment at the
Water Treatment Plan Laboratory. Funding in the amount of
$10,548 in available from Renewal and Replacement - Computer
Equipment (Account No. 442-5178-536-64.11) .
Agenda Item No. ;'/(.I-,
AGENDA REOUEST
Date: 01/09/95
Request to be placed on:
XX Regular Agenda
special Agenda
Workshop Agenda When: 01/17/95
Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Staff requests
Commission approval for the purchase of two (2) Uninterruptable Power
Source (UPS) units for the Gas Chromatograph and Atomic Absorption test
equipment at the Water Treatment Plant Laboratory from Networks, the
lowest solicited quote, in the amount of $10,548, including shipping and
installation. Current UPS units are of insufficient capacity and are
inoperable and unrepairable. Funding is available in R&R account
#442-5178-536-64.11, Computer Equipment.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: JJ_/NO DRAFT ATTACHED JJ_/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends roval of the purchase of two UPS
units from Networks. &~
DEPARTMENT HEAD SIGNATURE:
Determination of consistency with comprehensive Plan:
city Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable)
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of
funds):
Funding available YES/NO
Funding alternatives (if applicable)
Account No. & Description
Account Balance
city Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: @/NO tf11
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden ~
City Manager
FROM: Richard C. Hasko, P.E.
Deputy Director of Public utilities
SUBJECT: UNINTERRUPTABLE POWER SOURCE (UPS)
FOR GAS CHROMATOGRAPH (G.C.) AND
ATOMIC ABSORPTION (AA) INSTRUMENTS
DATE: January 10, 1995
Attached hereto is an agenda request with copies of three
(3) quotes for the purchase of UPS units for the subject
laboratory equipment at the Water Treatment Plant.
The laboratory has been experiencing problems with power
outages during testing procedures utilizing the GC and AA
units. Many of these procedures are meticulous and time
consuming in nature. Power surges and fluctuations have
resulted in lost data and unnecessary time consumption in
repetitive procedures. The original UPS units for these
instruments were of insufficient capaci ty to provide
adequate protection and are currently inoperable and
unrepairable.
The attached quotes are for UPS units of sufficient capacity
to ensure operational efficiency and prevent damage to these
costly and sensitive instruments. The quotes received for
equipment purchase, delivery and start up are as follows:
NETWORKS $10,548
COMPUTER POWER, INC. $11,570
CUNNINGHAM - WOODS, INC. $19,748
We are requesting Commission approval of purchase of the UPS
units required from Networks in Ft. Lauderdale for the
amount of $10,548.00. Funding is available in R&R account
#442-5178-536-64.11, Computer Equipment.
RCH: jem
c: William H. Greenwood
Donald Haley
n'Detenga nlGurumo
Jackie Rooney
f: T/F City Manager
;.;(.f.
. Z0' d ltlll]l
NET.aIlKII SALES ORDER
I Page f J
1
32f55 MERIDIAN P'!mV STI: 104-
FT LAUDERDAlE FL 33331
(305) 3S9 3880, FAA (305) 389 4220
Sales Reo Order . Requeeted Ditta ShIp VIa Ordar Date Purcha.. Order f
MNA $1'08179. 12123194 IRua< 1215194 TBA
Sold To: CTYDELRAY Ship To: CTYOE37160
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH elTV OF CELRAY BEACH
ACCOUNTS PAYJ\Sl.E 100 N W FIRST AVENUE
100 N W ARST AVENUE OELRAY BEACH. FL 33444
OELRAY BEACH, FL 33444
Purcha.. Order' TBA
Tax Exempt i 04002190860
Code Qt Item Number Oa.crl tlon Price Amount
ES 2 BST FE5.3KVA UN1NTERRUPTlBLE PWR SUPPL Y-R.ooR MOUNT 5299.00 10598.00
EN 2 esT LCS WNE CORD ASSEM. NEMA L6-30 100.00 200.00
EN 4 BST RCp.A S-15R RECEPTAClE 50.00 200.00
EN 4 BST RCP-G L6--20R OUTPUT CONNECTOR OPTION 75.00 300.00
01 2 BST SUO BEST STARTUP OPTION 300.00 600.00
EO 1 SYSTEM DISC SYSTEM DISCOUNT -1899.00 -1899.00
ax
Tax Freight Oapo..t Cred It Order Total
9,999.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $9,999.00
Note.
1) SUPPLY 2 BeST 5.3 KVA UPS WJil-I THE FOLLOWING CONNECTORS IN EACH.
(2) 20A SIMPLEX 240V
(2) 120 RECeFT1CI..ES
(1) 6' LINE CORD
(1) ST ARTlJP OPTlON
7~...J
--.\..IT '_',j'.I'-'''''''' _.., ~~ --. L-~-._ ~ ......._ ___
DEC-06-1994 13:07 NETWORKS INC. P.03
IIETWa__ SALES ORDER
l Page , I
1
3265 MERIDIAN PKWY STE 104
FT LAUDERDALE Fl 33331
(305) 3893880. FAX (305) 389 4220
S8'e8 Rep Order , Requested Oat. Sh.p Via Order Da1. Purcha.. Order ,
~ 81108181. 12127194 1RJCK 1218194 TBA
Sold To: CTYOELRAY Ship To: CTYDE37160
CITY OF CEl.AAY BEACH CITY OF OElRAY BEACH
ACCOUrvrs PAYABLE 100 N W ARSr AVENUe
100 N W RRST AVENUE DB.RAY BEACH, A.. 33444
OELRAY BEACH. FL 33444
Purcha.. Order it lBA
Tax Exempt , 04002190860
Code Ct Item Number D..orl tlon Price Amount
IN 1 INS FAElGHT INSTALLATION FREIGHT 549.00 549.00
Mr to the bMiO IX
'*
Sa.. Tal Tax Frellht D.poelt Credit Order Tat.1
548.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $&49.00
Not..
FREIGHT FOR $1108179
08/1ti/94 1ti:JU 'Q'~ U J ti 05;;: 1 t:i ~ CWlt'L 11:.1< jJUH 1:.1< '4j UU;;:
. . \ ~
~. ::
.'
. .
[g Computer Power, Inc.
m[E
August 16, 1994
Juan Manzano
City of Delray 3eac~
Dear Sir:
Below is listed che quotation for twe Uninterruptible Pewer Supplies
as you requested.
Minuteman ~PS systems with receptacles:
System *1 $5,100.00
6Xva
Outlets:
1- L6-20R 240v 20A
3- Standard Duplexes (6. Outlets) 5-20R 120v 20A
System 4:2 $5,100.00
6Kva
Outlets:
1- L6-30R 240v 30A
*** NOTE ~** This is more power ~~an this UPS can
deliver if run at capacity. You should not draw ~ore
than lOA from this out:et. If you draw more t~an this
rating, the warranty will not cover serrice
on this unit.
3- Standard Duplexes (6 outlets) S-20R 120v 20A
The cost for bo~h systems would be $10,200 plus shipping and installation.
The \v.arranty period is for two years. This covers all parts and labor
for repairs to the system. Run-tLme at full load is 20 minutes, half load
is SO mi....'"lutes. Additional batterI packs may be added to extend the run tL~e.
The setup and delivery charges will be quoted. on a separate sheet. These
prices are valid far 30 days from date of quotation.
Thank you for contactinq Computer powerr Inc. for you power system needs.
Please feel free to call me with any questions regarding this quotation
at 1-800-749-4274.
Sincerely,
-fl.-. -"-=
Ben Brotherton
Network/Communications Analyst
Post Office Box 5568. Florence. South Carolina 29502
Phone 803/665-0478 - Fax 803/665-2168
V;:J."tV ....-0 Vu 0 0;) ~! 0,,\ CmlPl'TER POWER @OO2
't. ,.,;1~ .?
.. b~ ,.r ...\
!, c\~4' / JI. y' ~G,
" \' ~)H.~'" ~r~
Jil-'~ \.L ~'t- . '
~< \{It'" .\~'';'
'.i\', \\.--
.., ,
[[g Computer Power, Inc.
m[f]
August 22, 1994
Juan Manzano
City of Delray Beach
Dear Sir:
Below is listed the quotation for shipping and installation as you
requested.
Shipping for 2 6Kva UPS systems =rom Texas to your facility: -$3iO.00
Travel and installation of these two systems: $1,000.00
---------
Total travel, installation, and shippinq: $1,370.00
These prices are valid until Friday August 26th, 1994 at noon. The airlines
rates will increase at that tLme and the price will be higher for
travel expenses for the installation. Flight must be booked Friday for
these rates. Travel will be at a later date.
Thank you for contacting Computer Power, Inc. for you power system needs.
Please feel free to call me with any questions regarding this quotation
at 1-800-749-4274.
Sincerely,
-ft,,- -4---- -
Ben Brotherton
Network/Communications Analyst
'.
Post Office Box 5568. Florence. South Carolina 29502
Phone 803i66S..Q478 - Fax 803/665-2168
15:14- ,..... - ~.:;I ~
:3-j.6-94 TUE
.-
Cunningham - Woods, Inc.
No. of pages inc1. this one: 1
To: City of Delray Water Treatment Plant
Attn: Juan Manzano
Fax number: (407) 243-7318 Phone: (407) 243-7060
From: Donna Ahem
Da te: Tuesday, August 16, 1994
If you do not receive all pages, please contact:
Cunningham - Woods, Inc.
3001 Greene Street
HolIywoo~ FL 33020
(305) 925-5515 ext 13/(305) 925-5424 Fax
Subject: UPS quote
*********************************************************************
Cunningham - Woods, Inc. is pleased to quote you on the following equipment:
Two (2) Liebert UPS/anon S 6. 0 kVA UninterruDtible Power SUDDlies
Each unit will include Factory Authorized Start Up, 3 years/::ll parts and labor
warrMJ fwith Preventitive Maintenance ~eiformed etween 8 am - 5 pm),
6 jVEl -20 receptacles. One unit will ave 1 NEAlA L6-20 receptacle
and the other unit will have 1 ,NElvIA L6-30 recTttacle. Input power
connection is an L14-30 plug and requires a de icated circuit
Please see attached brochure for other specifications and features
PRICE EACH: $9874.00 TOTAL PRICE: $19,748.00
Notes: Freight Included (Not unloaded)
Taxes iVOT Included
I
J ' . uvel rIVe . ' . . ; : I......
" .'
U1Hmate Power Protection . .:"/. ~ . . ".
} "'-.. . " .. . I.
L 1. I.L '1- 'l.-k 1..1. 1:FL1.1 iL. .. . - .. - . .I::.
~ " . .... i
,- . .
. . . . . . ' . . '. . .~ ". 4l "-J .
-- , , , ... '. ,,"
t .r . . '. " > ~ _.
j , , , - . , -. - . .. r_
.. ~.i l . .
. D ~f ."
j .', ' , , .' ,~. ,. ".~~'.~J'~tb.~..1
.. ,; . . .. .~
.. . y - -
. .
<- ; . ... .' . .;".........) .1
,. ".. ..
, ., . 'F"~ .
...~.#F R'-R -
E UP. S~. .Ji~. ~ l;~~:"i"
FE4.3KVA-18KVAUninterrUpdble . Power , Syste~s
", : '. .~.. .
,,~ .; .,
. ; .. . - J ..... . . .~ 5fJ5.
.r:.' .~. - .. '.
~ , . " . -
- .. - .' '.
w .. -
- b. ., . ~'.. ~ . - .... " , .. ..' '''''. . ..
.. ,..,
:;- .. ...... .. .. .0 ,. ";) '"
- ...... , .
'\ ~. .... , :
. '. . '
.. . .' "" ,. .....
-, - " -
~ .~ . .. J .......
'.. .~ .
,); .. .
- ,. ' . "
..
r .' .
. : . ilW iJ
.-4
. .
. .. . .~ FE Series FERRUPS
..
.. . ~ raises UPS,performance,
....
.. reliability" and inteJlipence
~
- '-<l( to new ieveis,
.--=
- <
J -<(
l 4 <; Active Voltape Repuiation
,:'4 FE FERRUPS has unprecedented
,
< ability to work with all types
. .c( of input sources and loads.
.. ~ \FERRUPS' active voltage regula-
factor corrected,switch-mode, ' receives .data at baud rates
- , .. tion (AVR) capability converts and linear power supplies. from 50 to 38.4K. With software
.. power from almost any AC source
<lI(
< into computer-grade power, ,from BEST, LAN users can
-< Longer Runtime, FE FERRUPS Two-Year Standard and easily conttol UPS operation.
~ Improved User Imerface. Users
. . . ~ can take extremely low or high
"\ Doubie Lifetime 'Warranties may customize over 120 system
~' ~ voltages and convert them to
. ~. : <( safe voltage levels - without BEST's Two-Year Standard parameters without learning
-.. ~ using the unit's batteries. For Warranty even covers the complicated keystrokes.
... ',..~
j.. '. example, a 120-volt FERRUPS batteries! Our Double Lifetime
. ~ boosts or bucks voltages between Warranty (in the U.s. and
, . increased Reliability
-< 72 volts and 138 volts to achieve Canada) covers both the UPS
'<, 120-volt output. This allows and the protected equipment Independent studies show .FERRUPS
. '. ~ the batteries to remain fully . from surge damage. has a mean time between failure
~ . ~ charged, saving runtime for
.~,: ...... of more than 19 years,
c- . '. <II( unexpected blackouts. Enhanced 'Communications ~,FasteT, I6-Bit Microprocessor.
- .-it .. Safer Opercuion, FE FERRUPS With this additional 'ffiicrop~
. '-0(
.. ~ stops harmonic currents 'genera: FE FERRUPS:brings even more cesser power, FE "FERRUPS is
. .' ~ . ted by widely. used switch-mode flexibility and. power to BEST'..s
I. .~ smarter, faster,and more reliable
. . .. ~ power supplies (SMPS) from -award-winning UPS than ever - all with Jewer parts
.; entering a building's wiring . communications. .which means greater -reliability.
. ..a ,- where they could cause a fire. ;. . SNMP Ready., FE FERRUPS ' . Enhanced Self Tests, FE FERRUPS
.; .( .. is designed for 'uSein Simple, ,performs automatic startUp and
- Computer Load Compatible Network M~agement Protocol scheduled tests on the logic
~. j . ~.. (SNMP) environme_nts. '. board, battery, inverter, and
l FE FERRUPS meets the demands Network Compatible. other critical systems.
.. of computer loads, including power, FE FERRUPS rransmitsand
..
..
. -. . -
. . '. . .
~. . 1 '" ...... ~, . -. .r" Q~', .
. .... . ~ .
(:,~ . . . .. - . ..
. ~ " - . -
. ...
i
, TTT~TT~T??TT?~~T?TTT~~TTTTTTT~TTTTTTTY
Description: Lin~interactive, computer-grade power during complete blackouts or momen-
uninterruptible power' systems with outstand- tary interruptions (not like a standby system).
ing Iighming proteCtion and isolation of Sine-Wave .Power: Computer-grade, sine-wave (
output neutraL Standard t6-cl1aracter power. S%. or less THD.
. vacuum fluorescent. display and keypad for Switcb,Mode Power' Supply Ra~. VA
easy- fing.ertip connol and operation is . ratings based on use with typical computer-
available. RS23-2 computer interface port . grade switch-mode power supplies having a . .J
allows remote connol and display of 231 power factor of O~ 7 to 0.8 and a crest _ factor
meter functions~ 191 alarm. conditions, and of 2.7' to 3.5.
more from terminal or computer. Audible Overload Capability: 125% on line for.1Q
alarm sounds in Morse code. Complete with minutes. 110% on inverter for 10 minutes.
sealed. nll'maincenance batteries. LED indi- . Surge capacity up to 150% of rating. ..
1.1 FE RRUP S' . caoolS for AC.line, ready, .charging, battety. ~uency:- 60 Hz :!: a~Ol Hz to ::: 3 Hz.
power; and alarm. Operating Ambient- Temperature: 00. co 400
- Centigrade.
SpeciflcMlons Storage Thmperature: -200 to +600 Cen-
Lightning' and Swge Protection:- Outstand- tigrade (+400 C unless battery is removed).
ing 2000-to--l spike attenuation. Passes beth Output Protection: Ferroresonant rnmsfor-
Category. A. and higher Category. B mer provides inherent. over/oad prorecnon j
ANS1lIEEE C62.41 and.45 tests: (current limiting). Alann for High AC. Low \
Galvanic Isolation:. Complete from line. Less Ac, and Overload on output. {
than 2 pF effective- capacitance.. Output. Input Protection: DC fuse and battery I
neutral bonded to ground. Qualifies ~ a charger fuse.
ClUe,. separately derived power. source under Safety: 60 Hz models - UL listed, cUL cerci-
NarionaLElectrical Code Article 250-5d. fied(please specify). 50 Hz models - TUV. OS.
- Common .mode noise rejection better ContlOis:, ON-OFF, Connol Panel.
than 120 dB. Battft'y Charger: 5 amperes.
Regulation:' =- 3%. load regulation. Under NOmHW Input Voit3Je Range: +15%,
<
any. line.; load,. or battery' condition, exceeds -ZO%..
recommended Computer and Business Equip- Batteries:. Sealed. nll'maintenance.
ment Manufacturets' Association (CBEMA} 43-7 KVA: 48, volt. 10-18 KVA:.120 volt.
and .ANSI voltage regulation standard for DimenBions. inches (mm): 4.3-5.3 KVA:
computing equipment. 29.5hJ15.5w/25d (750hJ395w/635d).
Continuous. N~Bieak ~. Line-inter- 7~18 KVA: 365h/19w/32d
active system. provides. continuous, no--break (930hJ485w/815d);
'FE and QFE +,3. 53 ancI7 KVA have 22 meter and 18
alann tUncnons.
III Hz'" 'tBi
#Iot*I. ~ AC Oufpur (....,. AC Input ,. DC ... SIMd. .... AIdIIlt- 8flIIIr. .. (1b&)..
- (K1MIW1. 1ZtN 2fJ6V. 2... IbIItt u".. (~s.t.1 ~- ,.,. ~ . No BIiI:I
Elfft:; FuifIHftII UI: dII~' IIId. BIlL
~ 431SO. 358: zrJj 17S. I~ 9t1' 78' 1~ 511 If3IJ 24Cl48
~ 53/3.T 4I.Z: 25.5 22..f I~' 90 SIll 2DI5f) ; 5' - 1463- ~
FE7IM- 7D15J).: 5113. 33.7 2S.2 12OG!D1lHO 90. 129 T2I33 52. 1_ 3Q/S1B .
FE1llIM . ltur7.5 S33 4&1 41.7" 2ll8I2Mt- 90- rt 1116 55 2BU 4<Q#'
R!Y2.5IM '. IUItf1/l'. 1/1(2 611' 52.1. 2lB':H(L. 9t gr- 11121 56 3315. Si1S't
FE1f1Kl14' 181J1t!J1. I!JD.Q'. au . 7!/J,. 2llII24O. 92'- 151 10126" 57 44li2 62!iIt
," -.
- . - ,- -.. . . -'. . .
"
511 Hz.... -,. - -
-.
"". ~ ACOIttputf-. M:"-, . DC .u.,. SIIaIt. ~ -........ .tMII:. iIlIt /lit
(X1GlitW1 ZJJW DIN 2_ .... U. (1Io&BllLr' ..........- ".... (ffneI . No.IIItJ
-- elk- Fu/fIHI1It LtL. dII (IneI bJcL .... .
QI"l;r4.11(W( 431SO 194 1&7 17S. 2l!QI2:D!HO' .9lI. 73- 1Q24 sa .333 115.71UJ33
0FES.1/(1It.. 5:JI3.7 2,(1 23D 22..1. ~, 90'. !Jot. 2DI5f) Sf ,411 131.1029.1
- - 0I'E7IM 7JJI5IJ 31.8 3lU 2112' 22D23XHO 90
122. 12133 52 .551: 178.51Z1<<
QFl:fOI(\M 101111.5-- ojU. . 435 4fT' 2l!DI'J>>'l(O. 90. 7't' l1I2fJ 55 .B33 zr7~
QFE12.SKVA 12..5/IO.D- 5U 54.'1' 52.%' ~ iI 96 1112T" 58: .. 251#
0FI:1~ ItIDff5D 81.8 783 7!b 2l!D2DJ<<J 92- 145 1t.v.aJ 57 13 m.~
-
tu.r IIIUIt fIJJIIOIr ~~., ,*,-alana~"'''"*9& ....-
~~-Uling"'''' F'ot<8dlMlnlIt/Wlllllllllll DIll*<< )aI" se;r... .lIl:iIo.-.w:. -
.t!'Eantt:QFEt(J. 12.5; _ 181M danat'-'" ~ s.e.n.._cotII1Iinedln ___ c8tIM -r.w:Ic. -
LTP-C221I-3S023.. . -.'
@!9M's.;. Pbooor1ildlaalaa).. '.
..I"rioIo.t_.USk .. -. .
. - .- .. .
- . -
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER t?11
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 9.A. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
REVIEW OF APPEALABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT BOARD ACTIONS
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1994
Attached is the Report of Appealable Land Use Items for the
period January 2 through January 13, 1995. It informs the
Commission of the various land use actions taken by the
designated boards which may be appealed by the City Commission.
Recommend review of appealable actions for the period stated;
receive and file the report as appropriate.
~ rt J1u1
-5-0
~
C I T Y COM MIS 5 ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: ~ T. ~ICI;NAGER
THRU: NE ~INGUEZ, ~RE OR
~RTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
./~~
FROM: JASMIN ALLEN, PLANNER
SUBJECT: MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 1995
REPORT OF APPEALABLE LAND USE ITEMS
JANUARY 3, 1995 THRU JANUARY 13, 1995
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
review of appealable actions which were made by various
Boards during the period of January 3, 1995, through
January 13, 1995.
BACKGROUND:
This is the method of informing the City Commission of land use
actions, taken by designated Boards, which may be appealed by the
City Commission. After this meeting, the appeal period shall
expire (unless the 10 day minimum has not occurred).
Section 2.4.7(E) of the LDRs applies. In summary, it provides
that the City Commission hears appeals of actions taken by an
approving Board. It also provides that the City Commission may
file an appeal. To do so:
1. The item must be raised by a City Commission member.
2. By motion, an action must be taken to place the item on
the next meeting of the Commission as an appealed item.
,
City Commission Documentation
Appealable Items Meeting of January 17, 1995
Page 2
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD SPECIAL MEETING OF JANUARY 9, 1995
The Planning and Zoning Board recommended that the City
Commission approve the ordinance calling for a referendum on the
annexation of High Point West and surrounding area.
SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING OF JANUARY 11,
1995
A. Approved (7 to 0) with conditions, a minor site plan
modification, the landscape plan and elevations
associated with a 4,177 square foot addition to an
existing showroom/office building at Dennis Fronrath
Chevrolet, located at the southwest corner of s.E. 6th
Avenue and s.E. 3rd Street. Concurrently, the Board
approved a waiver for the dedication of 5' of
right-of-way along S.E. 3rd Street.
No other appealable items were considered by the Board. However,
the following agenda item required Board action:
* Approved directional sign for the Delray Beach Tennis
Center.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD:
The Historic Preservation Board did not meet during this period.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, receive and file this report.
Attachment: Location Map
~
LOCATION MAP FOR
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
OF JANUARY 17, 1995
L-30 CANAL
. .-. . 0
i ... ~
i ::l ~
c: .J ~ 8
4( m
..J z
< ~
~ r-.-----. z
i1
~ III
;
LAKE IDA ROAD ;
;
0 i
J: ;
~ ;
m i
ST i
;
;
;
; ~
; ~
i 0
u
SW2ST ; F=
i z
r..!.... _.J i ATLANTIC AVENUE )- ~
1..- i ~ ;
<(
i ~ ~ is ;
.-___.i 4( 4( ;
:f
i GO .
i 0
~ ~ ~
i ~
i
i ~
LaWSON BOULEVARD
s.w. 10TH TREET A
0
~
~
J:.
i
i
r- i
'-- i
i i
Ll. i I
..J .
...J )- ,..--..../._.__.J )..
4( ~
z ! . G
4(
U :J ! !f
n - I
~ .
I I
... i
i
-------.--.--------.------.--.-----------
L-38 CANAl
S.P .RAS. .
CITY LIMITS --.--- .
A. - DENNIS FRONRATH CHEVROLET
I MILE I
I
SCAlE
N
CITY or DElRAY BEACH. FL
P~NINC DEPARllIENT
-- DlG/rAL f1ASE UAP SYSTEM --
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER t"1v1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # q. B. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
APPEAL OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ACTION
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995
This is before the Commission to consider the Historic Preserva-
tion Board denial of Certificate of Appropriateness for a free
standing sign to be constructed at Villa Delray, 127 S. E. 7th
Avenue. The property is located on the east side of S. E. 7th
Avenue between S. E. 1st And S. E. 2nd Streets, in the Marina
Historic District. The three-foot by two-foot sign will stand
six feet above ground level, and is located five feet from the
front property line.
The HPB reviewed the Certificate of Appropriateness at its
meeting of December 21, 1994. Based on a failure to make
positive findings to the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, approval
to locate the sign as requested was denied by a vote of 5 - O.
The Board did approve the sign face, provided it was relocated to
the front wall of the building as a flat wall sign.
Recommend upholding the Historic Preservation Board's action with
respect to the location of the sign associated with Certificate
of Appropriateness 8-239.
t~ 1:0 0lj7/95
..5-0
-ro '1"oe. A-fphMnf 'fh~ OffX'~/~ -1-0 ~
#1e.. i/PB'.s bflSlS ~~ d&/u'f; I (If po 1't1 I-s )
IIpphMni ,':5 10 SUJJmi+ weN IE/> ftnSwee.
p .' tY(
~
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
.~
-Q /1J. '\
THRU: ~DOMINGU Z, DI
DEPARTMENT OF PLANN ZONING
FROM: PAT CAYCE'~
HISTORIC PREsERVAT ON PLANNER
SUBJECT: MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 1995
APPEAL OF AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD DENIAL OF A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS TO ALLOW A FREE
STANDING SIGN TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 127 s.E. 7TH
AVENUE, MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT.
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
reversal of an action taken by the Historic Preservation
Board with respect to the installation of a 3 ' x 2 ' free
standing sign which will stand 6 ' above ground level. The
sign is to be located 5' from the front property line (s.E.
7th Avenue). The subject property is located on the east
side of s.E. 7th Avenue between s.E. 1st and s.E. 2nd
Streets, in the Marina Historic District.
BACKGROUND
The building was constructed in 1951 for use as an
apartment complex and has been used as a seasonal rental
(weekly, monthly) by various owners since 1956. The
property is zoned RM (Medium Density Residential), which
does not allow weekly rentals as they are commercial in
nature. Thus, the current use is non-conforming.
The sign and its location were approved by the Community
Improvement Department's Sign Review Committee at its
December 2nd meeting, subject to review by the Historic
Preservation Board.
The HPB reviewed Certificate of Appropriateness 8-239 with
respect to the proposed free standing sign at its meeting
of December 21, 1994. Based on a failure to make positive
findings to the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, siqnaqe,
approval to locate the sign as requested was denied, 5-0.
However, the HPB approved the sign face as designed
providing it was relocated to the front wall of the
building as a flat wall sign.
.
City Commission Documentation
Meeting of January 17, 1994
Appeal of an Historic Preservation Board Action
Page 2
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Board's decision was based on the following considerations:
* The building is located the the RM (Medium Density
Residential) zoning district, which does not allow weekly
rentals as they are commercial in nature. Thus, the
current use is non-conforming.
* There are other non-conforming seasonal rental buildings in
the historic district but only one has a free standing
sign. Signs are commercial by nature and are basically
inappropriate for residential districts.
* A non-conforming situation exists with respect to the
parking as no designated parking spaces are provided and
cars park at random in the front yard. Additionally, no
landscaping buffer is provided between the parked cars and
the sidewalk. Therefore, adding a free standing sign to
the front yard would create additional visual disruption
and clutter to the streetscape and would detract from the
residential character of the neighborhood.
* The applicant stated that her tenants know of the
apartments by referral or from ads in the paper and that the
sign was not a factor in attracting business from people
driving past the building.
R E COM M NED E D ACT ION:
For the reasons stated above, uphold the HPB's action with
respect to the location of the sign associated with
.. Certificate of Appropriateness 8-239.
file/y:villa-3
'. RECEIVED
.
kT: elII' CLk=.--e-~ tt~ J 0 -i9I
CITY CLERK'
.....,.-. Aprc-AL f1-\ ~ ACi1:o~,-\ \A K8'J
J- WISH '\D
~~J?.Dt~ ~ SI~N ApPF2-0VAL Tt+A T I
gE:L\'UESTl:::.-o ., --r1-\- E. eAsE CAME &po~
T1-+f; i:-t1 s TO g...\ c.... P .f2-E SE::: e. VA T1 ON 13>OAR..D
ON bEL ~ BEl2- 2.. ( f \qq4 . -.r BEL \ EVe
Tl-\-AT :c H-A-VE -r:14 C R\<4t\-T \D f+,o.ve-
A" rREE" S~N'D fN1 ~ ''9N AT MY
01 ) fOu~ \JI\1 t,- ApA2-TME1\tT tsUll_DIN~ .
I1+E t+lS~elC- P~VAT1D^J B>OA-R-D
YD Ii::: D It--\A-t ::r NDT ~E" A LLoWEL:> Jo
~"E" A. PR.EE -::;lAND I NG, 5 ,~rJ BUT
.
-R A- f"1.-l-E:1L \1-+A-, IT S(--\e)ULD BE- Loc..A TC::..-O orJ
,
~ vv~ oF- --r:f-\-E ~lL.D It-.J.~ . Tt\E ~s,
-fOrz- TH-€1 ~ D~ Sl~' WAS --r1-+Elg. op, N, o~
.
ll-\-A-. A S I~N I~' ~ ~'P ENTIAL lJEJE{-HBDf.f-bc
f5 ~EZ:Bss Ae-t L'( ~-F A COM N E:e. Cl4l- L
NATURE . -BE-CAusE OU~ ApAR-T NE~1S ~ A--e-E
-Rt=:N1E:.D ~SoNALLI -rrtey ~y """"THE SIGN
St-\ouLO BE ON TH-€ W~L.L I
.
. -.....:-- ~ UO'T 'f?;>EUeJ E --r:H- \ S f5 LAWFuL
.+
T~ ,AR.B{Tf2.AE.IL., <SA} ""T\+AT tvt"( Sl9N
SfbuLD ~ ON ~ WAL...L.-. H-t 5TO ~ CA lA-'f )
F l...Oe..-tD~ ~~~TNEN\ ~U,LD' ~9 NE\'4 HBoe-~p~
~"E:" ~LVv'A'l5 +tAD $ \ ~N~ A'r MO~T
EVEl2-, ~UI\.-Dl~~ . -rt-\-E N 6=- \ '9 .H 8>0 ff2-t-\<)o c IS
N.o~TL-, N^ ~~E'NT ~L\'(LDlI06'S ,b."-lD
HC~T c>p I1+E ~L1ILD 1 N 9 S ~"\J~ t-\A D
p~ ~A-NO{N9 '5 \ t:r~S A, OIVF \1HE
Ol2- ANo~. -n+~)e- \S ~ O....-rtt tJ 6
. ~~S ~L-I CJD MHE:e-Gt A-c, A~ou-r A
r~~ ~NOlt-...Jb S\~N ArJO ~1 ~VE"
AcwA,5 ~ c..o t--I\ H b tJ ~\S OF
FLoe l D p... Nt:..\ 91-\ e,o ~r-bo'D S w~ ArA~E)0f
t>LLlLDIN~ 5 f?EVA'L- . 'fl~ e>El-1 E\I-c-\1-\€
Sl'9N IS 't?~ Tl FU L AND W(L-L. b~LY
CoKPL\M~'~ ~61Ej~D~t-+ooD '. .
:c V\lIS t-\ \D 6"E AU-DweD 1'LJ t'uT
,
LJ~ tv\~ ~~ STANDlN9 S t 9tJ · ~\<-JDU
Ap?~NT - M~DA!-EtJA. popov -
OWNE'2-. 01= p~DfE:12-'T'f
J"~' 5e- 111-\- A'Vr; -- Z-, I-LlD~ 2-
-
-----.- -~.:::-:--:-.:-~:::..--~-..:..:....:.::..:.-
STAFF REPORT
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
AGENDA ITEM III.A.
COA 8-239
Villa Delray Seasonal Rentals
127 S.E. 7th Avenue
Marina Historic District
Youliy and Magdalena Popov, Owner
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The action requested of the Board is that of approving a free
standing sign to be located at the entrance to the parking lot
associated with the Villa Delray Seasonal Rentals.
BACKGROUND
Villa Delray Seasonal Rentals is located on the east side of
S.E. 7th Avenue, south of S.E. 1st street. According to City
records, the building Has constructed in 1951 for use as an
apartment complex. The building has been used as a seasonal
rental (weekly, monthly) by various o\."ners since 1956. The
property is currently zoned RM (Hedium Density Residential),
which does not allow weekly rentals as they are commercial in
nature. Thus, the current use is non-conforming. No further
development history exists for the subject property.
ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT
The proposal is to erect a double faced free-standing wood sign.
The sign face is approximately 3' x 2' and will stand 6 ' high.
The background of the sign is white with gold and green text,
and pink, yellow, green, and peach flowers and leaves. The sign
will not be illuminated. There is no indication that a previous
sign existed on the subject property.
The sign and its location were approved by the Community
Improvement Department's Sign Review Committee, at its December
2nd meeting, subject to review by the Historic Preservation
Board.
Staff Comments
The sign will be located 5' from the v..'estern property line and
29' from the southern property line (see attached survey) .
'rhe applicant has submitted a variance removal agreement \\'hich
states that the sign will be removed if the seLback area is ever
needc~d by the Ci ty.
BPB Staff Report
Villa Delray Sign
Page 2
The Ma.rina blsl~iTcC is--tesidential 1n chaTacter-;---~As-such, ~ staff
has concerns whether a free-standing sign infers a commercial
use and therefore, ~may cause proliferation of additional signs
in the district for similar uses. It may be more appropriate to
locate the sign on the building so as not to detract from the
residential character of the neighborhood. If relocated, a
positive finding to the Design Guidelines can be made.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
1. Continue with direction.
2. Approve the sign associated with COA 8-239 based upon
positive findings to the Design Guidelinesi Signage.
3. Deny the sign associated with COA 8-239 based upon
failure to make positive findings to the Design
Guidelinesi Signage.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By motion, approve the sign associated wi th COA 8-239 with the
condition that the sign be relocated onto the building.
Attachments
*Survey & Sign Elevation
Y:VILADRAY.DOC
. ,-
. -:;-:"""'" ---~
~.-...------..
-- ---
~ ,
4_ t
-
--"
t
I
i
!
I
!
.gcALE 1" = I' J
I
{ 12'
I I
~~ I :.,.,~SIGN REVIEW , ,
I I
! { ,
!
/ ( PLAN REVIEW 3
' ELECTRIC
\ 1..-\\ j...J\ C; 't STAFF REVIEW
~ ,~ ,.,- . /11 /; fNG1N~~~- S'
_ I)~ ~ '7 /I1~r /tL
~b ~h pres.
...
.
T J \
\
I .
. 'I r tick. 11Z
30M,^, X , ,
<:1- eo. t3...
~ ~ 1 t I
l I )
.
\ - ./
\
'""'-1
---
.~ ~
I ~ '" ~ .--.
Q... '} " ,~ ~ -. -= ....,,-
.... , <1"\ .
~.. ~ . ~' _ . ~. __ _ .____. _n___"__ . ___
_..- Iz~r__.~ _ _~u . . '.
'--', \ ~ "
~ ~
-;-~ (... ':::..
;) ,.. to "
~~ .." ~ ..A-
'l '" \ ~ ~ .I"
~ ~ s~
~ ,~ ~~
. \.\.~ r'-J ." ~ ....
;j I ~ ~ ;:;
Q \ ,,(. ... (:) ~
Q \;:) - tI)
. ~ \:l .
.... ~
'. {..: .L{JT~~'
. 1. LOT'l'! i~ - ~~ - ,l.(Jlt'? ( ~,,~
\\ ~oT'l'J) \....... ~~ ~
"'-l ~ 1I)",z' ~" >-
\.. ~ -~ ~~ -.::
~ ----\ ~ J ~ ~ I ~
~ ~ 0, =_1.E._~
143.00' ? 0 \
~ ..~...... "
~ ~ ~. ll" ~
~ ; \ i ~ . . .'
~ ~ ".~d:#L.-:1 ,l.6Tq~ 'i?
~-
~.~ ~ ~I~
~ ~ ~ ~-
~~ v~
t ,. ~
~ ~. ~ \ - - .
fct\: f; . l;o;;; l~ ~e.I'l..f?i~~t::" .
.. 2.~- '"I ." ;T.. 0
~"..- ~ I . "'.....
a.: ~:)~ . uOO.
~o~:rl ~~~ '0 .
~fl~ 5'.8 ~ I.~ ~~ ~1&. ~ ~ I~
. z 'i .. 0" _. . . "II ... ~
! .. ..' ~ :r 3 -< , - e. ()
."".oioolf \. liit~\.....
l~~u>~~- i "'....:1> t::F r-oo( r-.
~~ - · - .. . · .. ~ .-.... ...." ..l
t~ 8.!l ~ II ~ ! 0; ~ ~ ....-.....J
-.. Ifta. ==-.... ~
~ l.f ; ! I: f ~?: II ~ 1 - ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ S ~
~<a'~-"c:r ,,::0;; ~~!I' v ~" :. fi' ~ t::
oo..'N,.3o ;.:-- =-'"::1 a ~.. t:1 t; >
~ ...~-- . 33 ....:;:) _..
f"j.a:gg>> ... ID:7 ._, ... :!!~ z
~ · · > ..-ao........"~ - Q 0
~ " [> I. % _ ~ I ~ ~" l;' pc> sw.:,. " : !:>. Av ):. :-:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ...l
- ~ ~ .. e- " .. ..... it.. 1 1 '. r-'" ...... \... ~J ~ ...
li" ~.;:~ 88 ~~~.r .~~ -L~ ~'. -. S- r.;
i. It !? a. ~ en ... .:., .. Cj '" N :::: =' g;!;!. ... 6 r;;; Av ,~ . ~ "9 t'< ......... ~ tIl
;3s~~~ ~:;:~'l'~e.~:;, ~!i ...... I>:~ ~ :..~ 0
.~ " · :to ~.. t ... .. .. J. J. C... . f · '~ ~ Ii" :::.
~; !" oo~"" 0 ~ ~ f:: ~ ~...."'. ~ ~ 4 I~ ... ~Av ~ ~ ~ ON ::, t::l V:) ~
___.-co.... ...- '0 t.......~::c
@ f!?! 0 J Av - "'.. ~ . :-"\ t::
? I: I: i} -< ~ 'A.v - ii ;:- 2 Av Ii" If ... t'..
- : : t:> ~.:-- "-J'"
'\ ~ I N ~ ~ tIl g f b ~ b fi: ~ ([ I Av '" ~ _" ~ ~ < I:l
· " ~ rc i 0 r.... 0 i i>> - . . . '<".. I-t ~
.. - ~ >~ ~ ,C =< ~ "1 i _~ st.1 Av'" S':, ~ 0
.- tIl Z I.d -g -..- ~ _ ..,
~ ..,. ,., 0( c: 0 <5 I~. a S AV 2 Av' ... ~ I("""t.... r
~ .. ~ & --I ~ '-:: i;-;; ~ '" #oA ~.. '-' 0
~ '!' i )<~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ "J ~ i ,,'" ... 1- ",Iif ~ ~ ~ """- ::1
.. I>> ~ to) ;;t "i > € ; L IV I -5. S <t ~ ~l !'"
$ " ~ ~ I> 0 Z . i! en r}:, A \l I ~.;t 'or.:.) t::
~ 0 > ~ > 0 ;: J - ;E S ~ >--w r
q ~ e; ~ ~ 3: 1 8 I~ ~S[ ~utAvl,~ ~ :;.: f"\J \N g
,., "i > 0 > a ;,i.9.~:. 3';; ,---, t-...J ~
. > :r: '" 0 (": - ", -;; ~ ~ tj: ~ l"' _
.. z > ~. X' :::: - cr 1n6~ ~ -- h ... c: _ ....., .
~ n > CD ... lft b ~ :to
~ t. ~ j !) ?- ~o - s. ~ i! '~J I e \An r",.,., != ~ " '" ~
,,& - - a ~. ..IJ. ________ .._ _ .-.- ::.- n ~ '=--'
; i~ () :::? > iI' ~ ::; o~ . <J
'::t: 9'.:':""::!> > ~5S Z c::,... __.._
1'1 ;s:: ;co- ."... -i 000"< 0 IZ c: ~ ...... .:...__._ .._._._.. .......
:J~ ""::~--: -Cl.~~::O :JI~ ~
t i =- > ;;. > 9 C :: t I . 3 0 )J _~_ -==-"7::'~ ~ ....
\.:: - z..-.: z ~ " 01.., '" II' i! ~
! ..( ~ :< l ~L -< ~ _
_._____.____ ..___.____.__ __u '-_ __.______ u_
_:li...~
I
I,
.
. ~~~.-
..~ -
.
,
- . .
.
__'.___'~____~n " -----...------ ----..---
3'
2.'
27G -
~
tl ---; - --:-"-1-4"'11 e.. A"~ U 1 i
. I I . 4. 1
+ ; Ir; lJIl t- >--
3, .)' \P.
W ~ l:t' .<( <li~
IJ '~ 1~3~ ~
s I~ t-, \ ~ W
- ilj .Jf i 1
. ~ _ = .1 .~ SI ~ I \ -) , 0- tf:)(.Jf!- f'lZ.OF~TJ
o - 516ft-!
.
5'
r Fee s, Crt.! W SIOI< Pc..Of"u!..T'( /...11J(;.
2'" Fi20M CE;jo..J~ I
I
----i- 5' F J
e>,.. ~ vA 0 ,0 SIC,N ~O"1 5tDEwAt-j,:. To SIC;
Sf Dt::........AL.K....
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER 6r'1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # q. e. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
REVISED STORMWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995
This is before the Commission to formally approve the revised
Stormwater Utility Capital Improvement Program.
At the January 10 workshop, it was the consensus of the
Commission to increase the proposed expenditures in FY 94/95 by
approximately $1,600,000 to expedite the construction and
rehabilitation of pump stations on the beach side. The specific
projects to be added are construction of pump stations on Seasage
Drive, Miramar Drive, Waterway Lane, Beach Drive, Island Drive,
and Harbour Drive, and the rehabilitation of the pump station on
Thomas Street. It was the further consensus to fund the
accelerated schedule through short term financing in the amount
of $1,600,000 as opposed to a long term financing scenario.
Pump station construction for Bay Street and Atlantic Avenue, and
rehabilitation of the Basin Drive pump station are already funded
in the current fiscal year.
Recommend approval of the revised Stormwater Utility Capital
Improvement Program, with funding through short term financing in
the amount of $1,600,000.00.
~(W;
u.J/ ~C5LfI- ~ ~
5-0
Agenda Item No. q.C.
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: 1/10/95
Request to be placed on:
XX Regular Agenda
Special Agenda
Workshop Agenda When: 1/17/95
Description of item (who, what, where, how much) : Staff requests
Commission approval of the revised stormwater Utility Capital Improvement
Program which increases the proposed expenditures in FY 94/95 by
approximately $1.6 million and provides for the construction of pump
stations on Seas age Drive, Miramar Drive, Waterway Lane, Beach Drive,
Island Drive Harbour Drive and rehabilitate the pump station on Thomas
Street.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: tIS/NO DRAFT ATTACHED tIS/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the revised stormwater
Utility Capital Improvement Program.
DEPARTMENT HEAD SIGNATURE: t/t/~ J/ft/r~
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of
funds) :
Funding available YES/NO
Funding alternatives (if applicable)
Account No. & Description
Account Balance
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: @S/NO [N
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
. ,
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
FROM: William H. Greenwood, Environmental Services Director
SUBJECT: REVISED STORMWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM~~
DATE: January 10, 1995
At the November 15, 1994, the City Commission approved the
stormwater Master Plan Schedule of Capital Improvements and
authorized staff to proceed with the project list for FY 1994/95.
The project list for FY 1994/95 included design and construction
of stormwater pump stations on Basin Drive, Bay Street and
Atlantic Avenue. Basin Drive and Bay Street have been designed
and the construction contract was awarded at the January 3, 1995,
City Commission meeting.
Because of the heavy rain falls in November and December the beach
area flooded three times, generating numerous citizen complaints.
In order to alleviate future problems, staff is recommending a
revision to the stormwater Utility Capital Improvement Program
which would bring forward all of the stormwater pump station
projects, contained in the stormwater CIP, to the current fiscal
year. This proposal also provides for an increase in the proposed
expenditures for stormwater capital improvements in FY 94/95 by
approximately $1.6 million and provides for the construction of
pump stations on Seas age Drive, Miramar Drive, Waterway Lane,
Beach Drive, Island Drive, Harbour Drive and rehabilitation of the
pump station on Thomas Street.
At the January lO, 1995, City Commission workshop meeting, the
Commission consensus was to approve the revised stormwater CIP.
Based upon the foregoing, staff is requesting this item be placed
on the City Commission agenda of January 17, 1995, for action.
WHG:cl
Atchs: B. Revised stormwater Capital Improvement Plan
-
~-~-#-~-lam%m~.'.'.AW..'.'.'~'.'.~.-..."',
I:::~:~'t 0) k~ ".. }",. I\) nt:: 0 1::":7::';7; ::.;.:. ".'/::::'.
J.. ....!l> Ii\' -Ii' I;m. ... "{l '-1.' Q:J:.' ~ .j'..!." Z 1m......... ?;!....... "V~W.. '.MI'.. :IM. It I! !i' I it !!J "V >
~ n ~ '< $ ~.,. . il= l} m .....:!; .....g. t>: . III III it I i ~ ~
ii0.. l!!C/J,?g. ~~". '!J ...0 ...!5.i.I3'lf:.": :. O"V -<~
!!l. In." o:r '" 01 .. iil:o. .,..' ., '.., 'I I n
.~. (; i !!.!. ~~. & III i .[ ~ if If/ Ii -. '..~.. ~ 11 " << i i 9.. - ~ . =-
W 1\l ~...';('.'.'..... i ~" "V ~. !i'.'1J.... i ~.' j-' I ~ .~. !l.~.........1 ..:01........ >~ ..;w.'.t .1.", C/J; i. !r ~ I if ~
~ - ~ I:) j' ~ 03 0 'l' :2' Q 0 .' ~ .. '1 .."",. I' .il- !L i lIi;:l
[,l' g> "J( iI.. ~ ." 11 ::II tl iil. '" ill - !l- iil. ii!..~": .,' ....
ll: III 10. ...ii....... S' ...... 3: ..N.... i. .fIJ...... il.~.. {! = I if ...~........ ~ .Oiil.............. wi,. '.." f J a_
3d! 'liI0I18. "1>>''''11-;;.<3 ''liIiIr~ """"; ~ =
!!!II. ""'" 'iii . "" . ~ .. - ......... 0 ~ '" .. :~,' :
i[~I~f;.~I;i ! Ii.! ~ll.~:~~ i'
iiI' In 2" !!' ..,... I ,. - '" .~,. ...... ~ ~ 6.... j I
:o;OI!l..:.!.."V Q.~~-.:!: lJij ".!j ..~ I
g 'S. a. .[';' ~.;.j "Ia.. ~:... ......... .,'4
i-' a Off. It
!..~ ;, lil-.9 I ..ttl >
~ l ". ~ [ ~ '. .... ....11 I' ~
got I I~ & - ~ ~
Zi&~~~. ~
,,~..~~ ~ ~
~R~ _ _ ~
!! ra. It %, ""><" ~ i
III ",... ~Ul 'Ji~ ,I" t ....!::l~ t:::1
a. m. ........,. !-> .. J:l !.... .~ JlJ .<0 "~4... ".J.l... 'I~"w':-, .tll ~ .A ::.. '"
". 3' . < 0 ~ =4 Q ~ g Sl! "-l'.! ":.." 'l? ~ ~ 81 ~.
'< ~ 1< l:I < ~ 0 l!S - - ~ 0 ~":'^'~ :illii..9 ~ ~ - IJQ
0/ .:.", ::". ;:I
II 1.111 '~Ii~ ; ~ ~I~ I I IIIII~I ~B~
O"T1 ,......<< . ........ I ..... < i> 1>< $.i' ~I^ $" Qill I ... ~ ~
;;; -(/ ..< 1<< ~;tl ' .., ~ Oi "i .~ ... ~ ;::.
!;l I ....... 1<) 81 1#' :"IIl:;:! 16 t:l IS & = 2 <
. ...... 5:! Wi).... in ill 5:! 5:! ....... n <
". ~ .,;x,,~,,~ '.ill! l;l ~ ~ 81 0'. ~ )>
· . '.- I i.lii ...8...... ;~~
, ..' , / ~lt: . ll! m ~ ~ l!i ~ ;: ~ c:
,... . '" '"'' " ..... .,~. . ,.~ _. ." l'"l -t
..:< 1<> !>< I.. &f .'I"<<'"I:~~ ~ . i" S' ~ r=
I>.": !<.<) I> 81 :,~. .., .'. . 1:'~ ~ t:l ~ ... a ~ ~
.. ...... '>.. .... I..' \1. lii .1". jJ ., " L<
<i <.. ii:> ~ If'!$ ..~ >..:' ~ ~ ~ ~ iI ! ~
:i << i<<>~ I> Jf"'W,f' i% ~ too;; "
.... ,::>< I>: .:i 1/ 81 II '!I,"l I; i t:l ~ ~. ~ t ~
.... 1......- I' W.l .' ., I'" . - . C Z c
., ~*. :. '::" : ,.; 5!
......... I, ~ llii* l..) .!! ~ ~ i .. .g
..... ....i < 1 g:lllil ~ ~ ~ 8 ~
~I:II ~ ~ ~ "m ~ ~.
. .....1; \. [I I I i Ilil ~
......... .';.' I.. ii! ...:.:'.h&.:."."11'\1:.' i ~
'> ,.....: ,.....< ..... 811: ..' :i ~ t:l ~ :;: 0 !.II
, 12': I~ I.) ~~'a
· I I I i Iii;
:.g:III~ m t:l~~E
2 12 / 10 10 ~ I I J II~I
....... i : Ii :.1*f Wt 'il"'~' ~ . ;.",
: I ...... ....... g:U, "". l3 t:l ~
< I' ;..... li:i:' tWo I!; ~;. .. !->..
'Ii < I:.... ..... ........ ~mf.~; lit. ~ ~ ~ ~ ..
1 ..... . lIT Wi %.t; Ii.I ~ .;
I H.." ... 1< Ul .'%l .~,.; 8l ~ ... '.
.. 0 '.,.,...,.,. 181..~"..... t:l IS m 0
..... ........ x:i I.... ~ :Ii r :1 .1' ~ ~ ~ ~ S
,:,:.:,): 1<,' ,-: 1:,-:':', _,:-'. ~ :..'.' .:...;~.. _
/. . - ..
: 81 I I I t:l~~e
I> L 1'< ..... ".,. 1<: I: I tl. I.:} I I ~ ~
I ....... 'C-.. - ,,~~, ".w.'
,.. I: ..... ;..< : '> Ul 'il::'~ ~ ~ ... ;
..... ...... ..... o~. ;.... t:l IS m 0
1< ......;i... ..... .......... ...' '.-1"'" :.J..:....... .. - ...
1< ....... I.. .... ...... s;! .. ,e" ~ s;! s;! II!
..: ..... ... l:S .".....,., }i" l:S l:S ll> ....
i\ ~ III I I I II~; ~
.. - .. ...
~ ~ & ~. ~ ft .~ ~ g ~ ~ ~.~ m ~ ~ ~. ~ I ~~. ~ ~ ~~. l::l 13 ~ ~ ~ =
> > > I > > > > > > (.II (.II ~ ~ ~ (.II ~ i (.II (.II ( ~ ~ ~ I I' ~ ~ ~ I ~ (.II Q % >
ii:; ill.. i _ iii. i .~. ~~ 3 I. so ~..! ..... m i.... .~.... ~ .' .... .... ~ It iil . . ~ ~ 2. rn. :=
... .Ii. '" '" '" '" ~ ....... ~ ~.... Q ... ~ ~ ! n i... ." ~ i-..... 1[... ~ . ..... '. 0 "I.. ... i to' I>>
(,.) 0 CD It. W I\) CD 0):.: A G)'::T CD~' 0-; -!b. ......., -:-' ::. 0.' Qo,l<<!!. ~:: f')
(.II (.II.. (.II (.II (.II III (.II III (.II in !Il !. ~ a !Il ~.'. ~ i'." ~ 4...... ~ SZ.. '" I. ill'; ~ i.~ \ill >14....:J (II =-
~ _ _ :e ~ :e :e :e ~':e ~ :e ~ "U Ii ~ "i'i ~ "U :e em! ii' i i i "U K i. .. "U .". I ~ 11 B
iiillllllfllll!~~illl~!j!ll!i.i!!,~lli~
:; !l. .. "UJ! "U Jl "U "U"U "U "U "U "0 ;:> ~ Sf Cii .. iil it 'Ii "0 it tl!I .. iT 3' tl:l
~~'.g~!'J~!'J~M'~M'~!~~&~ ! .~""!'N ~'N" 'Ntl_! ~:
I~~ ... ~ ." ~i-~!:I il ~ls ~ll!~ ~
~~~ I G J & Gi= 1. :~:~I 11'3 ~i!.. ....
~r! ~. w v ill w j ~ - _S ~ , ~ i
"U :J 110 ........ L I>> - If I!l! I)> ......... .m I>>
~ Ii ~ .... .....t ~" I ...... It I> I> .... ,.
1';" .. 0 1< .. * i......... I. ii!. 1< ~. L< I"
~ ~ ~ .... I',' - * I> - n> 1< Ii lit ......<
!II 5: 8" -
Q. 3 "" f"::o ..
~~~ ....... ~ ..... m~~
:l. 1! -
i~g 1< ~. >. 1 .... i
3. !II > ~ I........ .... · .... ...
.. it g ~ ..' ....
5. f j ~ ..' ..... ....
l ! 1 ' .....<): .... I)<i. ;.;. ....... ~... '.' Pi i
ii m I) .......; < ~ ;;1<>< 18': ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ......... ~ ~ III l!l !:l 2l
I! i y G I~ ill I~.W IIIII II ~IIIIII.
2!{> ........ ......... ~>ii .....; .........1
~ !S. iii'<. .Ii. '. '" '" -<
a ~ 5" P !D!,," ...
~ ~ ..) ~ ........ ..... ~ ~ .., ...........
~ <l; ..... .....
I J .......... <t I) I.. .'. I ~ I> ~ ........) g.... ............ I,> e
. I I ... "'; III It I ~ It It> ~
- Pis" I I. '<.' IS! I ~:i'
fi. I I ~ !> ~ ~ [} Ii I<....i 1/ .'.
~} 1/ Fl'} I!:! I} I ........ I} I}
Q. ~ I...... I...... I...
-< I ... I 1/
i I}i> I} ~ ~ } 1 I} I} Ii} 1/. I.... ." ...... e
tv g .. 1 I I ..... I !/> F I}} .... 1/ E
!l.
~ ..' < ....../ ....... /<
': ~91~ ! ..... !}e
5. 1< ...... ~ ~ ~ I> ...... 1/ Ii
~
~ V s' i k Is 1< .
i ~/~ / !}</ I\\i e
~>} ~ .......... I. I ....... .... ....... I> ~
/i<}}// ....... I} > .. . I .i... ~
} ~ f -~ ....... ..... I I ...... Ii} I}> .... I} Hi I
/ .~ I> ~ I> ...... !i' I.... I> I .... is
! ....... .......... ....
..... ..... i
.... ~ ~ . " .>> I}\ ........ I I '.
I I..' "'i}/ I. ..... w.
r
'" ........;
~/>i ..... ....} ....i ...... .......
i ~ ..i/ I ......../ I}} I lii<i Ii ." ....... '.'
~i I}\ .......>i <i Ie
!I Ii } ....... ....... ,/ I }I
> I .......}< I, Ii .. --.- ;.
~~ ...... .......} 1\>
!:!!:! .... ~. <.~ I: ~
~~ ~ ..... v .
~.. ~\.} ........ 1\ : .... li\ ;; I....... Ii.} I........ .......> L> i.
.. _> Ii> I} 1<> Ii ...
~ ~ !..} 1\ .... F I\i I/~ Ii> ... ....i
~ 1< I} I ...... }} ,i I.. I'.' I.}.i. 1\ ;.......
!:! / I}. I}" ....... I} ! ..... ......>
~ I> Ii Ii} I}i I>......
!" ,...i> I/i .....ii I I ~
li\ .~ . ....} . ..../} . .... <} ~
I ~ ......... ..... .... I ...... ....... I... ~
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # q. /). - MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 1995
SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 22/HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C.
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995
This is before the Commission to consider Service Authorization
No. 22 to the contract with Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. for engineer-
ing services to design and construct new pump stations on Miramar
Drive and Atlantic Avenue.
Funding in the amount of $48,418 will be available from Storm-
water Utility - Miramar Drive Pump Stations (Account No.
448-5411-538-62.45) and Atlantic Avenue Pump Stations (Account
No. 448-5411-538-62.46) , through proceeds from short term
financing for stormwater improvements.
Recommend approval of Service Authorization No. 22 with Hazen and
Sawyer, P.C. for engineering services related to the new pump
stations on Miramar Drive and Atlantic Avenue.
~ 6-0
Agenda Item No. Cf./) .
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: 1/10/95
Request to be placed on:
XX Regular Agenda
Special Agenda
Workshop Agenda When: 1/17/95
Description of item (who, what, where, how much) : Staff requests
Commission approval of Service Authorization No. 22 to the contract with
Hazen and Sawyer Environmental Engineers and Scientist in the amount of
$48,418.00 for engineering services necessary to design and construct new
pump stations on Miramar Drive and Atlantic Avenue.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: ytS/NO DRAFT ATTACHED ytS/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Service Authorization No.
22. Funding is available from the stormwater Utility Fund.
DEPARTMENT HEAD SIGNATURE: ~4~n~h'J J //R/'~-
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of
funds): ~ ~~ + ~~
Funding available E NO .-- ~
Funding alternatives ." (it ,applicablfi)
Account No. & DescrintionA4..8-S411__53.8-62 tiS .M1111l"'"'r Dr ;md 448-~1l-~3&62-~(tAt;.l..Av~~ '
Account Balance _ $< I~AQ9CLOO l;rir.:lQ}'lT pr.. anO. , $252,00.0.00 AtLAy,p .'
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: ~,$/NO t~'l
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
FROM: William H. Greenwood, Environmental Services Director
SUBJECT: SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 22 - HAZEN AND SAWYER ~~
DATE: January l7, 1995
This is a companion to the agenda request for approval to
revisions to the stormwater Master Plan Capital Improvement
Program.
At the November 15, 1994, the City Commission approved the
stormwater Master Plan Schedule of Capital Improvements and
authorized staff to proceed with the project list for FY 1994/95.
The project list for FY 1994/95 included design and construction
of stormwater pump stations on Basin Drive, Bay Street and
Atlantic Avenue. Basin Drive and Bay Street have been designed
and the construction contract was awarded at the January 3, 1995,
City Commission meeting.
Because of the heavy rain falls in November and December the beach
area flooded three times, generating numerous citizen complaints.
Staff is recommending a revision to the stormwater Utility Capital
Improvement Program which would bring forward all of the
stormwater pump station projects (seasage Drive, Miramar Drive,
Waterway Lane, Beach Drive, Island Drive, Harbour Drive and
Atlantic Avenue), to the current fiscal year. Also included in
that proposal is the rehabilitation of the pump station on Thomas
Street.
For expedience sake the design of the next priority level,
Atlantic Avenue and Miramar Drive, is recommended for award under
this service authorization. The service authorization is in the
amount of $48,418.00 and includes design, permitting, bidding and
construction management services.
Requests for qualifications will be solicited for the remaining
pump station projects, contingent upon City Commission approval of
the revised Stormwater Utility Capital Improvement Program. Hazen
and Sawyer has estimated that by consolidating the design and
construction of the remaining pumps stations into one project the
City will decrease overall project costs by 10-l5%, which will
offset the total engineering costs.
Funding, for design of Atlantic Avenue and Miramar Drive pump
stations, is available in the stormwater Utility Fund.
Recommend this item be placed on the City Commission agenda of
January 17, 1995, for consideration.
WHG:cl
Attachments
J8H 11 ' ~35 g: 15 F ROt-' HAZE H SALJYE R-BOCA PAGE.001
,-
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
CONSULTING SER'lICE AUTHORIZATION
DATE: Januar~ 101 1995
SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 22 FOR CONSUL TING SERVICES
CITY P.O. NO. CITY EXPENSE CODE:
PROJECT NO. (CITY) (HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C.)
TITLE: Atlantic Avenue/Miramar Dliye PumD Station and Dralnaae Improvements
This Service Authorization, when executed, shall be incorporated in and shall become an Integral
part of the contract dated as if written there in full.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This Service Authorization is for the provision of qesign, permitting, bidding and
construction management services for a new stormwater pump station and associated
drainage improvements for Atlantic Avenue and Miramar Drive. Specifically, the
improvements include:
Construction of new stormwater pump station, including vertical turbine pumps, concrete
wetwell, gravity and pressure discharge lines, remote telemetry unit, and flap gate
backflow preventers. The level of service for this station is based on a five year
recurrence interval storm criteria.
Work is assumed to be limited to City road right of ways or existing drainage/utility
easements.
II. SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. Phase I - StudY and ReDort Phase. Not Applicable at this Time
B. Phase II - E'relimJnary Desio" Phase. Not Applicable at this Time
Post.it'" Fax Note
To I :
Co./OI!Pt.
Phone fJ ~ l{3-
Fa.u 70 {, D Ph~#
FllJlII
PROSC1fJ7.BCA:01.fO.95 ~
Pagl1/ 1 of 5
-'--..", .. '. --
J~N 11 '95 9: 16 FROM HAZEN SAWYER-BOCA PAGE.002
~
c. Phase III - Final Design Phase - Provide surveying. floal design. oonstruction
.
documents. and germlttlng services.
CONSULTANT shall provide final design phase services in accordance with Article
III.C of the Contract.
CONSULTANT shaJl perform all hydrologic and hydraulic modeling necessary for
system design. CONSULTANT shall perform hydraulic analysis for pump station
design. CONSULTANT shall prepare necessary site, demolition, paving and
grading plans and construction details. CONSULTANT shall prepare all
construction specifications.
CONSULTANT shall produce the final design drawings on standard 4-mil, 22-inch
by 34-inch mylar sheets. CONSULTANT shall prepare all drawings utilizing a
CAD system. CONSULTANT shall furnish. with the drawings, one set of CAD
drawings files on IBM PC.AT formatted, magnetic media compatible with
AUTOCAD Version 10 (or later) for use by CITY.
Services shall include preparation of detailed final opinion of probable construction
cost based upon the completed final design drawings and specifications as
approved by CITY. The estimate shall reflect changes in scope incorporated
during design reviews with CITY staff.
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the coordination with CITY staff and
departments, and for the activities of the sutrconsultants. Part of this function is
to monitor progress of all staff associated with the project and to identify critical
areas of concern which fall behind schedule. CONSULTANT will maintain a
detailed project schedule and take steps when necessary to insure the project
stays on schedule. CONSULTANT shall submit monthly project status reports to
CITY.
CONSULTANT shall prepare and submit, on behalf of CITY, construction permit
applications to the following regulatory agencies:
. South Florida Water Management District
Associated permit application fees shall be determined by CONSULTANT and paid
by CITY. Any desIgn of additional water quality treatment facilities required by
SFWMD will be considered additional services.
D. Phase IV . Bidding/Neqotlatlon Pha~ . Provide bidding and contract
neaotiatlon ser:Y.lces.
The CONSULTANT shall provide Bidding/Negotiation Phase SelVices in
accordance with Article III.D of the Contract.
CITY will utilize standard procurement procedures for the formal advertising and
receipt of bids.
PROSC197.BCA;01.10-95
Page 2 of 5
JFH..J 11 ' ~35 9: 16 FROM HAZEN SAWYER-BOCA PAGE.003
CONSULTANT will furnish 20 copies of final drawings and specifications for the
City's use.
CONSULTANT will provide pre-bid services, such as preparation of
advertisements for publication by the CITY, distribution of planholder lists, issuing
of addenda, answering technical questions during the bidding period, attending the
bid opening, evaluating bids, and making a recommendation for award.
CONSULTANT will prepare 10 copies of conformed contract documents for
execution by Contractor and review executed Contract Documents and bonds
before forwarding to the CITY for execution.
E. Phase V - ConstructIon E!base . Provide construction manaaement services.
CONSULTANT shall provide Construction Phase services in accordance with
Article III.E of the Contract.
CONSULTANT shall provide part time resident project representation through its
Resident Engineer and Engineering Inspectors in accordance with Article I1I.F of
the Contract. Part time resident project representation shall not exceed 40 hours.
The CITY will provide material and soil testing and inspection services as required
to assure compliance with the construction documents. Also, CITY will utilize the
services of a concrete testing laboratory to perform concrete tests as detailed in
the construction specifications and deemed necessary by CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for the means, methods and accuracy of
material testing subcontractors.
F. Phase VI . Resident Project Representative Services Phase - Not Applicable
at this Time
III DATA AND SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY
CITY shall provide Data and other services in accordance with Article IV of the Contract.
IV COMPENSATION
ATLANTIC A VENUElMIRAMAR DRIVE
PEE
Design $31,472
Bidding $4,842
Construction $12,104
Lump Sum $48,418
PROSC197.tJCA:O 1.10-95
PagQ 3 of 5
..'.
J-AH 1 1 ~ ~3 5 '3: 17 FROM HRZEH SRWYER-BOCR F'RGE . (J04
-
All surveying, testing and permitting costs will be a direct cost to the City, paid out of the project
contingency line item on a time and materials basis. Surveying testing and permitting costs not
to exceed $30,000 without prior authorization from the City.
Additional services, if necessary, will be provided on a time and materials basis upon written
approval from the CITY.
IV TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The completion dates for this work will be as follows (starting at written Notice to Proceed).
Completion Time
Design 15 weeks
Permitting 22 weeks
Bidding 22 weeks
Construction 40 weeks
This Service Authorization is approved contingent upon the CITY'S acceptance of and
satisfaction of the completion of the services rendered in the previous phase whereas
. encompassed by the previous Service Authorization. If the CITY in its sole discretion is
unsatisfied with the services provided in the previous phase or Service Authorization, the CITY
may terminate- the contract without incurring any further liability. The consultant may not
commence work on any Service Authorization approved by the CITY to be included as part of the
contract without any further notice to proceed.
Approved by:
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C.
Date: Date:
By:
Thomas E. Lynch Gary W. Bors, P.E.
Mayor Vice President
Witness
Attest:
Approved as to Legal Witness
Sufficiency and Form
PROSC197.8CA:01-10-95
page 4 of 5
- -. -
. -JRt,) 1 1 '95 9: 1 E: FROM HAZEN SAWYER-BOCA PAGE.005
STATE OF Florida
COUNTY OF Palm Beach
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of _' 1994 by
.Gary W. Bars. Vice Preside.nt (name of officer or agent, title of officer or agent, of Hazen and
Sawyer. P.C. (name of corporation acknowledging), a ~ew York (state or place of incorporation)
corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She (is personally known to me) or has produced
identification), Florida Driverts License (type 01 identification) ~
identific&tion) and (did/did not) take an oath.
Signature of Person Taking
Acknowledgement
Name of Acknowledger Typed,
Printed or Stamped
PROSC197.BCA:01-1o-9S
Page 5 of 5
........ - . . -- '"' - "",. -"...-- .---
. .
- .
[IT' DF DElRA' BEA[H
DElRA Y BEACH
F lOR I D A
tdtd 100 N.W. 1 st AVENUE. DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 . 407/243-7000
AII.America City
, 'III! MEMORANDUM
1993 TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
ru1
FROM: "'Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM:## 9-ECITY COMMISSION MEETING 1/17/95
APPROVAL OF WEST ATLANTIC AVENUE GREENWAY PLAN PHASE III
DATE: January 11, 1995
ACTION
City Commission is requested to approve the Atlantic Avenue Greenway Plan
Phase III for the current fiscal year, in the amount of $25,000, with funding to be
split 50/50 between the Community Redevelopment Agency and the City. City
share of $12,500 to come from the General Fund Construction account
(Contingency).
BACKGROUND
This item was reviewed by City Commission at your January 10, 1995 Workshop.
Priorities and estimated costs, per Commission direction, are as follows:
1. Lot at N.W. 9th Avenue $ 8,700
2. N.W. 10th Avenue (fence-ficus hedge option) 1,300
3. S.W. 7th Avenue west of Schulers 8,100
4. N.W. 7th Avenue north of Amoco Station 6.900
$25,000
At the Workshop, City Commission requested the Community Redevelopment
Agency to share in these costs 50/50. The Community Redevelopment Agency
will be meeting on Thursday, January 12, 1995. Commission also indicated that
the 4th priority location is not a high priority item.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve as proposed or approve first three priorities only.
RAB:kwg ft'oe€~ wiYn (I) C1-- c~) . h~
~
File:g:agenda ~ on (a) f1- C~) ~ (!Lyf
Doc,:greenway.ok
cnm~ -
@ Printed on Recycled Paper THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS ~5-0
-
Agenda Item No. :
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: 1/11/95
Request to be placed on:
X Regular Agenda Speclal Agenda Workshop Agenda
When: 1/17/95
Descrlptlon of agenda item (who, what, where, how much) : Approve Atlantic
Avenue Greenway Plan Phase III for the current fiscal year, in the amount of $25,000
with funding to be split 50/50 between the CRA and the City. City share of $12,500
to come from the General Fund Construction (Contingency) Account.
ORDlNANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: Y2S@ Draft Attached: YES/NO
Rec omrr,enda t ion:
Department Head Signature:
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable) :
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure
of funds) :
Funding available, ~ NO
Funding alternatives' .AiIAv
Account No. & Description:
Account Balance: jJ .5
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: cff~/ NO ttp~
Hold Until: I
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action: Approved/Disapproved
- ~ -r};:. c~,-
CD Community .~ 41r~
Redevelopment fv~
Iltg/t!/O 0
-a Agency
Delray Beach
January 17, 1995
Mr. David Harden
City Manager
City of Delray Beach
100 NW 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
RE: West Atlantic Avenue Greenway Phase ITI
Dear Dave:
Last Thursday night, January 12, 1995, the CRA Board discussed the City's request that we
participate in the funding of the above-mentioned project. The Board supported the concept of
participation, but our current budget does not have any funds for the project. The Board further
discussed that once we resolve the disposition of one of the historic houses and the CRA frees
up funds we would, at that time, be able to make a commitment for the project.
In summary, we cannot commit at this time but would be willing to fund 50% of the project once
we resolve the historic house disposition. As you know, we are spending more monies on land
and renovation costs than anticipated.
Christopher J. Brown
Executive Director
/d
207 E. Atlantic Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33444 (407) 276-8640 / Fax (407) 276-8558
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # q.~. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
BEAUTIFICATION PLAN FOR WEST ATLANTIC AVENUE
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995
This is before the Commission to consider approval of the final
plans with Cotleur Hearing, Inc., Consultants, for landscaping
and irrigation of West Atlantic Avenue between the CSX Railroad
and Military Trail. At its meeting of July 5, 1994, the
Commission gave approval for Cotleur Hearing, Inc. to continue
preparation of the final plans. The final plans reflect the
variations permitted by the Florida Department of Transportation.
As a result of these variations in the plan, the landscaping
portion of the budget has decreased and the irrigation budget has
increased.
Exact cost estimates were not available at this date; however,
the consultant will bring detailed costs to the meeting on
January 17.
Recommend approval of the final plans for the West Atlantic
Beautification project.
~5-o
. .
,
. A<Jenda I tem No. I cr. F".
,.
. "GENOA llEQOeST
Date: 1/10/95
Request to be placed on:'
X , Regular Agenda , Spec la 1 Agenda
Workshop Agenda
When: 1/17/95
.
Uescription of agenda item (who, what, where, how much).
West Atlantic Avenue Beautification - Final Approval -
Cot leur Hearing Consultants ,
ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO
Recommendation: Approval
.
Department Head Siqnatures A~~-~ ,
!
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan.
.
City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): ,
.
Budget Director Review (required on all ite.. involving expenditure
of funds): -
Fundlnq available, YESI NO
Fundlnq alternatives: (if applicable)
Account No. & Description:
Account Balance:
City Manaqer RevIew: 6)/ NO zr~ 1
Approved (or agenda:
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received: ,
Action: Approved/Disapproved
MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ~
THROUGH: LULA BUTLER, DIRECTOR,
FROM: NANCY DAVILA, HORTICULTURIST/SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR C3]Q
RE: WEST ATLANTIC AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION - FINAL APPROVAL
COTLEUR HEARING CONSULTANTS
DATE: JANUARY 9, 1995
ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION
- -
The item before the Commission is the presentation of the final landscape
plans for West Atlantic Avenue (between the CSX Railroad and Military
Trail) . With Commission approval these plans will be let for bidding.
BACKGROUND
At the City Commission meeting on June 7, 1994 the City Commission adopted a
resolution authorizing the City to apply for grant funding available through
the 1994/1995 State and County Roadway Beautification Program.
At that same meeting the consulting firm of Colteur Hearing Inc. , was
selected to prepare the landscaping and irrigation plans as well as the
preparation of all information needed to apply through the Department of
Transportation for a variance from certain design guidelines.
On July 5, 1994, preliminary plans were submitted to the City Commission for
review and approval to continue with the final plans.
The Consultants had many meetings with D.O.T. and the final plans reflect
the variations permitted by D.O.T. Ultimately the City was granted relief
from Index # 546 which enables the planting of trees with a trunk diameter
greater than 4 inches within the sight triangles established, providing that
50% clear view of an oncoming passenger car is maintained. All such trees
must also have 8 feet of clear trunk.
We were not able to get a variance which would permit smaller specimen
materials under 8 feet in height, even though we could maintain 50%
visibility. As a result, the landscaping portion of the budget has
decreased. The irrigation budget has increased, however, as a result of
utilizing the Motorola Irrinet System and the MIR 5000 which is consistent
with the long term plans for the Parks Department's citywide system.
Exact cost estimates were not available at the time the agenda packages had
to be submitted. The Consultant will bring detailed costs to the meeting on
January 17, 1995.
1
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Commission approve the beautification plans for
West Atlantic Avenue as prepared by Cotleur Hearing, Inc., and give
authorization to have the plans let for bid.
2
r ---- ---
.- -
- - -
I
..
., ...
.
:-:;:'J"l : .: J T _=JRt:"'E~~ I 'Dim ="-{)'E :'0- 4217 747 1377 J3,.-"
1 7 1 ::J::J5 34: 33::"1 =-2
~w 10) ~ .. -.j ~ .. C7> .. ~ -t
'-I ro ~ \P Ol_ 0 ~
W"'" N - m J>
.0) ro w.. ... ~-- ... ~ en txJ
el ~ 0 Clt.) U1 \D
~~ .. [l) .... U1 -f
OColN C.
"N N ~ '-l....-I-~W-~ >
... .. .;> - .. g;.....0l "'-..J..4 \P ... - ... .. >
. \P I.D co ... """" (Xl-OO N 0 ~ I...) -i
"'w w - .. N .. ::Ol t >
"'" -' -f'
~N N 'J! ~ 0 "-i to- Z
-
~'" U\ '> .. .. N t .." V1 ." .. -f 0
0:> 8 0 -.J
N"'" "'" " '" ..... woo (J1 '" t: n
I t Z
I "'UJ 0) '" .. ~ ~-..J ID c" co ~ CXl . ~ ~ ~
I ~l1> C> - '" ~ 001 '" 00"," 0
I :t
jjtn '" N .. :0: to> ~~Ol~ OJ ":0: m ."
0
0'" '" "'''9 0 o o~ 01 '- ~ 2
w~ N"'" N'OoJ-_ - ~ c: p
00 ~ -N..offi c..o-lCN "'w C7><11 m
\ .....~ Cl U'01O OOlV1W 0)", c
\ t~ ... Ol .. ... Iv ~~ N ... g:, )>
.:>. :x> 'v W OQ en tJ1 .. ~
\\ - ..... CO> 00 U\ (0 0 tv <P
Z
<110:. co .;> .. ... -N N- o. c:
~o:: NO C> W NO": Cll~ .;> Ol w~ -t
(Xl w ..... w U1 0 -4
- -
..oN ..... ... .. ... ~ N '" .. "T1 -t
~N N 0::: N C7> a> Q) tJ1 ::: -
0 (") -
~U\ N .. ~-...JU1""" ... .. > m
'" w N U1 ~ ~ en
....0) :xl .....N U' wWOl.;> 0 IV -t
-
~~ ~ ~O~...C7>~~W~~~t .... o~O'=i;
"'~O~O~~O~"'~g"''''\D'''\D ~~~ Sl'POl "'C1l"'N.....~O Z
(11= = .;> ~..... ""'CO'P-U\ tJ1 "oJ f1IN "-I "'i ~
~~ ~~ m
r-
~l: -
~~~ ~~~QQQ~~ ~ ~: n~ 3:
~ ~0~~~~<~R<~~~PQ~~~2~~~Cea8~t -
. . 2
(II ", III
~~o rT"~""~550 Ol~~~-~b~~~~~~~~~~$Qnn~~~n ~o~nnn~~ )>
>z'" ~;IO~ :::l.... mOmmO ~ ~ m~c C ~X - ~ ~C~~OO 0
....0::1: ~~....~~; O?~Q~~~~o 6~O~~X~~~Z~~~~~ mmc~zoO~ ~
g(.llgJ ~~Eooignn~o~~~ <~_(.IIc~~~Z ~~~~g8~~
~~; :Il::b~m~ mm,....r-;= ~:l>>.,.,,,.,1't1 :IJ .00 ~O Z- .TlC >~ -<
n()tD~o=1 ~~&8-U~~~5z~~cZ~n~~~~;~~~ !~c~~o
~o NI -
m;(.Il ~~~~~~ - >- ~ Onc~O....~O< ~n~oo <~ ~Q)~
('lc~tr1-< ~~ ~2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~>~
c CIljj~ 03:00Cll o ~= I/lE . (.II' ~('lC:ul C1 z-' <r-
2-i ~~~""rri Z <~ pXr--O~ >B>ccn ::b1't1~ g;o <1't1~~
. Cl_ co~~~ q o~~ ~ ~5~~Z ~< ~~ g~E ~~f >~~
' z :S::Zm ~ ~ 0 m;lO> ~ TIm C (.II ~~~
~~ ~O~~ o >:%> m 0 I'TI O~ 0 Vl ~
~C-- ~ .... ~ ~ C ~ ~ 0 ~ me
zahi:2 > ,., m " ::0)>
~'e ,.. :::l:%> 0
o~(.Il'" 3: ~ ~ ~
~- c: (TO
) i!?z ~ ~ ~ CIl
:'
Z I Zen :II )> 0
-. ~ ~~ ~ Z
." m
. ' z ~~ )> :'3 :Iln""'O<"'J!o~ ~nn ~~~ 3:...r-"'O(/'l~ C")
~ :IJ :r ~o~c>~ ~J2 -:1)0 <Ci=iPCi ~
, ~;:j > oO,~:I) ~s;o ~zn VlC:Il ~mcn<m
() ~~ i.., nzor-;';o- m C/lcO xmo ooC/lJ:g;jO ~
m ;i z~~
~ #. :%>....O.,.,C1Z~.,,~ >i:~ o>;rip Z
~R" X> .,., ....r;;zL;IOUlo-<~ ClCC ~.... )>7<c:~~;2
~~ Z 0 8 ~~~'-~~-< o,..~ ....P ~ ~/'n::jc I
-." z ~ :0 :t';oOC " -<: OZTI
~ (,~ ~ o~!:~ 0 ~~> -4 o~
pZ ~ Z
~ ~~ ,.. .... Z':I)"O Z ~~~ :::l ~
!!) M ?;; ~~5g; :r
, p i~ ~ " 0
I ~ )> :rl :o~ 0 0 0
:xl m ~~ ~ :u VI
~ 1::
~~ In 0 .
::( cO
c
~ "00 F:;
mO
1 ~ :D - Z
(5 - ...
.. OUl
0 03:
, - -en'" m
... =0 ~~~~~~~p .....~ -....----
IV ';,.>(/l .......w N - , ~~~qN,?
U"! (.h" .. ~ ~
~ ~~ --Q:loo ">-_ . , ... ~~o " )( >< )( x ><
0 t..J' : I - . <.n OJ WW(11 OO....(l')C/)CXJOO i
~ .V1X-N)( ~. O;O:~ . n (> .' C? '.' .
VI ~~~~><~~9
:,.. ~ 0~::: U1' 4>- '" ~
.... OIl' 'O~ V')> )( )( '" .,' . r)I . .
. ~ ~. . . ww ' c f!~ n ~
C7i0l r p
. . :0 : r
, -_.,,_.~-,.__.,~- >
w""......"'rvNN ,.~N ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~
" N N . . . ~ ~ 0,
O~..OOO' (/l (j) . ~Vl(/l ~Vi~VlI/l(/l
hP09i')nno :riSO :J:r:r $:r:z:xxx ~
, '000"'0 o ' 000 00000
~~!"> ~~~ ~~:E~~~
zZ zzzz z:
en CIl (f) :J~~~~~2~u-, ~~~ I/l"nUl ~~~~~~ i
i c c: mc:rn
Zr-FF~r-'Fu FF~ rn~ F8FFFr:
en en ~r- ,~~
d ~ -4 ,~Il"Il"Il"~Il"IlO:: Il"Il" ~n~ ~O~~~~
0 0 0....:i.......~J:1....- ~" ~z zoczc:
';'4 ~ -i n:: :t:rI :r~ :z::r
> oon(')nnno" oR ~OTl o~ro~
0 r- r- ".,x~x",,~xc ,""x :>>~~ ~c::;:j~-~
~ I .... r . F ~, ~,
% ~ "0 111 r !a~!a '-In",CmOl
m r- ::b :0 N N 0)>,:S:~~n
-f ::tl ~ s: m ~~t!
0 ~ - :: -lZ '
;j ~ 0 oQ5 : oCcl:,-l
-f -i o < 0",0 ~~i:"'::t:
F: !: VI en OJ m 0: . tD (.) 0:> _
.,., ~.....c'.C:z
en < 0 C r n . "J i: "\l;
m Q ~ r 3: ~0,,!~a;~
r 0:>
::f ~ 0 n c: o~~ni::"
3: :I:l ~ )> ." . >:r;x. ('l
;. /' ~ Z (.oJ ~....m~:r
, > < 0 )>("lo(")8
. ~ m ~ --I:r ::I:
.I In nm m
! :%:0 0
- C m
---........... oj. 0
~
, . :I
0
"' ".) c...
m ~ <h ~
~ ~~b~~~ ~~~'\l~""'~Ch(J)(h ~ Qo CUt t:--t ~~~I::;~~
,", 11" . O. COND> o"o~~~:-J:-':-J 8~~ ............... l:n~~~~~
n 808800 C") 80080"'08"" ",Om ~
'," ~ og8 ' 0' 888888
0 o 00 00 0()10 01 808
0
CI) "'i 0 ~
-f
~ </) <I>
~. .. . .... ... N ~ ~ ... ... ...
"'''' ~ 'I oCI>~ CO '" .~~it;<4' ~ ... ~~~~~*(f,::~ ""<I>"" fh(h<J> q, ..". ~ (,,+ 4,")- In
...~~Olt-':-' t ...",'" -lDN
" "'~ N *.~Q)" - ..... -..JO"'~CD!l'5D-O . . w w. . ~ !V W ./JI 1J !" ~
......,'. ~~ ... N 0~~8t ~ c., o....,"'.oc:> 0 ~~",~(Q8~NOO 00 CJ1 ' (,J (tJ en ~~8!gg~
. og8~g~ ow'"
~ '" 8g88~ ... 8: c; ell . COo~w(..)"""(..oJ OOC'> 8~p ~~~~g~ 'i
88 8 CO A o. . 1I1. , ... g\&.o' 0, , -.len , , 0 0
t:88g~ 888088g~ 00' 88g
N 8 N ell ~ ~ 008 ~
'"
... ...
,
1
ok,
~
.. ~. .
~
;~
.'4
i
'\
!:i l' III
~ ~i i f J i~ r.t:f5Q::g~
1ZppIOM 'q;)'e~ A'eJI'[~<m '908 .~rs '- c it
-: ..
<70-
UOJltrJJfilntJdfb mU312lb 'J}+UVJllb 1S3~ :E or- ~,jll
~ I ~ litH
~ f ~~ I~II~I · ..J i ll!ll
o Q) Ifh ~'J'
U:r: ' ~:I' ~ oJ..l
-t -\ ~ -- '1-1- r- . 233H~ 8tHl ~-1 .lHU~~t '--' ij'- \ .~ '/--.-
3NI1HO.lV~ 3NI1HO.lV~
,
, '. , , $l ~ Zb
\ I ; \ I -~-- --\~ ' <(~
, ....J~
It /1<0 0.<
0: , <0 : \ &Ilk:
\:j z \ Uj!! \
, ~....
~ I or- u8 ,C\I W
c ::t:l:: I ~ iL-. ,::t:l:: a.
~
11 () z <(~
....
.n (,,) ~ ()
w \
eel , <( , ..J
.n
- 1 ~ C C/)~
-- 1= C
-- --\-
--- ;::
I w <l W 0
"
~ ~ ~ \ I ~ z~
\ J_____
1 J J <( ~2'
1 1 = ------ , ....J:
J I \ \i I
0 \
I \ \ ~
, , ,
, 1 1 \ i ,
~ j ()'\ \ I lL I in I
(}\ ( )
(:: (\1 Z
. , ~
w
z C
~
, r , \ ~ ,
H\ . \ I !:: 0
..J 1 .... ,
__I I in .n
iii ~ I
:> '"
~ _1-
i I! 11\
r-- --
-- ~ II --
1 ,
, - I i~ ,
I I I it II
I!
\ ~ . ~ ,\ I
J ',,\::
I : ,
Cf) '.,J ~;
CJ\ 1 (') , 11 I III t---- ~
"-. (1.j
, \ , I ! \
I \ It
a:
c
1 , I \ 1-- l-
II \ ~~ ~ I Cf)
UJ
~ a:
~
-;
I: \ '- c
1 0
I : \ m f 0
3:
a:
!--~ I---r-=-. UJ
I J:
f'.- ___ Cf)
(J\ ---
c( 1\ ,---. :\ 1---
N
:5
a..
w M-- 1\'
Q ill
~ ====fl 1-_-
: I - - ~ - ,J--
a: ---- = I - -1-: L - - I: - \- - -
-
...l -
- --
w gt I \ -- l
Cl - -
J : \ \\ i I \
I j \ ~
, , n I
lL
>- ! \ r\--:; 8\ i \
....
\I.
I : \ ~
w
C
iii
~
I ! 1 \ o ~ I~ w
\ II
~ II ~ e :lC:
--l ~ ;:m \ ~
& 11 ai m
I ~ \ I ~ .. \;: ~ \ I ~
.... , II ~ ~
r I .n 11 m
\, I 8 \ t'; ;: - ~
~ UJ --, I ~~~~O~~~/-'~_' . -'-
I . 8
r \ w
~ 0
Ik: ~
a! U
1ft'
- -. - -. - -. - -. - -. - -. - -. - -.-
, l03rm:ld :f0 .L1V'411
... u r."'.~
::; ..,~ OB: III
:3 ~ ,'l ]::;2 1e1P!-l!OlW[ 61Lp)1e~ A1e.llPG 6908 l1[OS "'3 ~; C\I if
~ ~.~ i jt U; uOJ11JJ!;/i1n1JJfb mu3f1,16' :7!1UVJ116' 1S3~ ~~ . ~ 'lilll
U u:r: Ii]! uf~ hl!~1 dMI
--/.- ~3~~~O~~~ ~ '--' -1,--,-
: <0 _ _ . . _ _ . ,C-l "lHS,33S
_ _ _ 1 (V) 3NIlHOIV~
--- -l ~ Z~
\ I II
1'\ ~ 1 Z 0 1<0 <(~
\, ~ 1 <( 'I (V) ..JW
~ C ~ ~<
~ :ii Iw Izw
~ ~ \ ~ I~ ^
n.l" 1 1 0 u.. 2
" 1 I w <(
~ ~ ()
~ \ ~ (f)~
- &I I
- 1 ~~ I 0
I ~3 Z g
_ ~ ll-. <(~
~ a ~ ..J;
- ~ t 1
~ ~ 2 I
: p ~
lL :: - ~ ~ ~ ~
C: (\1 ~ II
~ ~ '\ ~ I
.... n I -
~ ~ ~ I
- ~ >
~ .... ~
s ~ ~
-Sl ~ ll\
... X
ll\ W
~ 2
2 ~ 1
- '" I' "' \ ~ i
C) (\1 \ ~ I
(\; 0 JQ I
\ . ; - - ~ - 1- -
~ \ I
~ n\ I
I I. ~ l \;~ ~\
\ Uz Q
If) \ ~~ OC~I
1,1,,\ (\; )5 ~
()
(11
~ ~ I
~ \ ~ 1
~ ~ I
w
I Q ·
I: . \: = = == =1
\1 . \! \ i
II I :ii \ 1
~ S I
~ I I ffi ~
C\J - c5 ~ \
I ~ 1 ~ ~
1 ~ ~
I \ I <0 = L~= = = \:
I I I C\J
\ ~ Ii:
! ~ \ I ~ _ -J, _ . _ _ . , _ _ , _I, 133HS SIHl
3NIlHOl V~
__. '__' 0__0-
. \
1'\
~ ~ ~ ;;. 11
:3 ~ j l ] I::~ 1ep1!JIOl!.!]I ',[p'e~ A1E.liJI;;J)((]l '908 1fS " '" ~~ C't) hI
~ ,~rCd i 1.11 j ;; uOJ11J:J!fp.n1J3flj Q1lU3(21C JR-uVJ11C.JS3~ :" I 'lll!1
~ 8~ If i ilJi ' I~ I!~I ...J ~ mh
-l 133HS SIHl ~
- - . - - \' - - , -3NI1H:)lV~- , - . ~ _ . _ , t- _ . _ _ , _ _\' , v-l..l..H~ 33S
\ / I i-~J \\ \ I ;I1H;;
~ <0 II It I.q-...J ~
0. ::tt: a.. <(
~~ ~ i ~ \ I t \ r~ ~ \ z
I \- - ====== <C W
\ ~: I ~ \ \-: : ~ ~'
!!l I W I C/)~
----~ _____J_ 1--- I ~ I ~ '0
I \ I \ \ I z~
I . . I : I ::s : _
J . I I \ \ cr, & \ :
I ru I (\.J t
(\..1 C\I :: 0
i i I =4 .. ==J I
- I - I
: I~ · It : I \ .. \:
l~,' II. 11 I ~ :;,i\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
\' \\1 I- ()(.,. ~ ~
'C\J ~ Q \ ,_
I . eu I _I ~ \ ~ ~ ~ 1\ 5
- ~ ~ a III
I lU I ~ a ~ i!2
!!, II> ~ II >
L I I ~ \ I \ C ~ I\~
I I 2 ~ I' ~
: : I - \ _ J d- _
II i I - - - i~ - ~ \. I \
\ ~ ,
I: ~ II : I == rL==== I \
I,}J it-.. i I
~ ~~ I I
: ~ ca I ~ I ' \
I I \ ~~ = \
I I ~i~ -
I Ii \ ~ - \
! . ; '", ~
: I \ --
Qu I
il ~~ II \ W
u lk:u >
Ik' ,..: ~UJ I , ex:
_ ' _ _ : = = = i: = = ~ _ _ \ :\: i
\ 133HS SIHl
.~:l'lHS .33S - - ' . - - . - - 3NI1H()lV~- ~ ' -
. - - , - , - - . 3NI1H()lV~
E; I.l is ~ III
:3 ~ if] I:: ~ 1EjppO][.ill 'q:))1E~cm ..{1E.lr][~((]I '9ijg .~rs ' '" .. ~ h
~ -2.~ ! ]! U; uOHtr.JJfi+n1J3flj mU3t2lC JPuVJ1lC 1S3(M, ~. ~ "11111
~ 8:r: If i ~!n i~I!~ I ...J ! jHlJ
\-.-
\ --'-
9-' ".l.H$ 33$ . - - - . - --- .
- :fti\'HOl"vr \ ~'IA .
~ \ \W Z~
'j \ ~\ \ <( ~
, l} <0 ....J W
\ : ~ ~ o..c;!
~ j[ ,Z (/)
\ ;. ~ II ~ UJ
\ , ~ \ W 0..2
\ ;~\ to \ ~ <(
ill ~ 0
It jl\- -. - - - -. \~~~~O~~~ \ ~~~~~\. - \ ~ :
\ \ \ \ ' 1\ <0 \ \\ l \~ :5:
i \ I \ :;', . : ; \ \\ D \ \
\ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \~' \ \
I \ \ 0 \ \ ~\ ~\
\ 1 1 I , ~ \
\ \ i \~: i ~~ ~ \
\ :: \
II
~ ,
\ ~ ~ ,
~ ~ \
\ I i I - ~ ~
\ 1 ~ _I Iii : \
~ I ~ \ \
~ I i[ I
~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 i f\\ \ ~
\ 0 ; r- ~t ~ I "\ ~ \1 ;
\ : w: 1 \ i (
I \ I \ ~f~ t~~~~, \
I <Il to I :: -- ,
~ ~ \ r-- ,
W II \' C'J
;5 \}J 0. I
G ; ,
;:: ~ I
1__!__ i \ ~\ i I I
I '\ ~, ,
::: 1 \' z \
\ ~ 1
I- I \ ' ~ ,() ,
I ~
~ ' , ~ (,'\ \
; _ &-, "lHS 33S N ~
z '3NI1HO.iV~ \ \ ~ _ -~- 1
, <Il ,
, -t-I------ ~J~~o~~~
-~-
~ ~~~~;; 19
:3 ~ I ] ~~ 1e]PpoJ[.B[ 'q~1P:~<ffi A1P:.llj[~((][ '903 1rs "'r~~~ LO If
~ ~.ffi llj d ;; UOJ1V3Jfi:t-nV3flj 31tU3121zPJ.1-UVJ11b 1S3~ l~. ~ 'lull
o (1) h :[ "'~jj( ~! h ! Ii; jIll'
u:r: II g Ul~ hh! ~ LJt.
\
I"
(XJ J.33HS SIHl
- , - -'1' - - , - - .
) . 3NI1H~lV~
__'_ __, __. \9:l1HS;33S
'l 3NI1H~lV~
\ 'I I'~''': " (0 Z b
/ (i,l~ C\I
I ::: <( II
\ / (0 CO ..J~
/ * ~<
~ 'z
I * <c W
, I Z -
\ ~ I ~ ~ ~i
\ · ~ __ 0 ~ ()
=I===~ ----- , w (/) ~
\ I ~ 0
(V) Z &
I I C)
~ : '" ::5 :
\ ~~ ~t I ~
<ll III I .
'M :n ~
\() ~
'1
CU
I \
I (~
I ~ ~:
;;/
\ : ~
<ll I ~
~ 1===== \
~ I : I
~ If) I - ~
- ~J ~
_t==== ~
,- -~
I If) ~
I I '" ~ ~ \
\ ~ ~
3 in
- Iii
~ I ell ):
, \ ~, --- -- ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ Q
w ~
Z 0
:i '1"
5 I ~I ,
! i i ~ K: ~ t \
f I I <ll ~
~ \ I ~ ~ ~ \
I ~
'"
I -
-- -----'-
\ (V), =====-- -------
'0 u.:
01 0
II!
- !g ,
L I ()',
==r=== nn - I ~, :
\ I ~
! 0 .
I',' t5 ~
I - ~
\' ..q- CO
\ ~ g
~J 0
'1" ~
ru ,~ ~ ~~
_ I. ._ \,__V:"1'lH~3?S._ _ ._ __()!-_.133HS~IHl ,.-..-' ._ ~
I -1 --\ 3NI1H~lV~ :.'1 3NIlH~lV~, I t-- -
.... ~ J: ......
... w "'''' Ilf
'0() :; '" '" 2:2:
1e1P~o1l.!lI 'q~1e;}g A1e.lI1PO 'g(ijg ollrS 1,
:3 C j j ] ~~ :!~ <0 ~JHt
~ Q)"ffi . j ~i UOJ+tJ:JJfi+nV3fl) mU3(21zj JJ+UVj+1zj 1S3~ ~u
~ 1 i J~ ~~ · I ~ iIjH
o Q) !ih ~~{' hill i ...J $ ~h it
u:r: . ~L~ ili .Jl.l
"
~ -.\)
I "t
--~ .l33HS SIH.l ~ Z b
.--.- , 3NI1HOiv~ C'l
\ I <t w <:( .11
....
- ~2 ..J w
:r-
(O~ ~ a. -'
1 I c(
-- Cf)
\ I -- 0'-
0> ~~ W
w * ~~ a. :~
lL Z a~ <:(
d j[ (t
~ ~ <( ~d ()
t- O ;! ~ (j)
d) CO
!h * W ~m
~ ~ O~ 0
Z \ \ Z> Z ;~
<( \ l <:(
- \ ..J
0 \
w
: \ ~ \
\
\
\
I \ \
\
I \
\ \ ~
w
w
I ..J
d)
\
I \
\ \
I \ \
I \ \
/
I \ \
I
\ i~ > ~t ~ \
,
-
\ LJ ,
I!J I d) lL \
\ ~ ~ ,
\ e ~
/ .::.:.::. \ d)
{ =~,::} ~
=\ ::- \ c. I = =
(\1/ ~-
I ~_'U (Yl
I --- 'J)
\ CU
"-
I'- 91
I
I
\
~\ \ \ "
?; "- <
..J
> \ 0
t: / ~~
I ~
J \ ,
..0 "- / , CU
'<t
.n \( \ ,()
X III ,
W
a I~
?; \
,
t ,
\ \
,
0.;
~ I w
?;
, ..J
>-
\ I t-
:J <0
in
;n
:s:
, , ~ CO
I \() .n
\ n. x *
, w
a
?; Z
" \ <(
I" -
\, \ 0
W
\ ~
\ I
J
-I / 9-1 '.lHS 33S I
--. -_. . 3NI1HO.lV~ ' ~I
--. --. ,-
l
::; ~~i5~; I II
,...'00 f ] ~ Ctw~~~
1l?:]Pll]J[O][.ill 'qJl1l?:~ A1EU][~r([ '908 lrS '- c 11
::::5 C ::;t! =l .... f'.. ~!Ht
<1--
o Q).~ j j i~ UOJ1VJJfi1nVdffj mU(}(2Jtj JJ1U11j1Jtj 1S3(U, r >-
...J I i5 il'~'
;= 1 -1 J~ ~ . 1"
o Q) IIh -~{' hl!~ I -J il,fl
u :r: ~L~ Iu 11'
~ .Ji.l
f3HS SIHl
\.- 3Nf\1401'Vw ~l 1pHS 33.2-. -. ....L -
-
-1 - . - - . \- IN\1H01'V~ I ~ I
-.--'
\ \
\ , 1\ II Iii
\ \ ~
\ l,\\ \ 0 Z b
~ C\l
\ , ~ I 11\ I I (,) ~ <( II
(\ \ .
....
, \ Z I 1 \ \i $2 ...J w
..J
, \ <( I 0.. -<
\ (,)
\ ~ - :~ ~==~==== kt i CI)
Ci C W
~ w
S , [ I 0..2
, , ~ I <(
, \ I ()
\ :,: \ \ ~\ f ~ ~ (f)i
I 0
\ I ~I I U I Zlil
, ~< \ :".\1\ ~\\ i / ~ <($2
\ I'-
(\J ...J:
UJ \ I
?; I I \ ~t I / 10
--l iii
>- , \ ):
r- ~
:::i :1
iil \ U\
" iii x
I' ): \ w
(, * I 2
U\ \ ~ :/
x I I
UJ d)
0 I ~ I
?;
\ w
UJ I \ 'lJ 'l )
--l
d)
~
& I
: I I
\ -
~~r~ /t / \
.---1- n_
rn- ,_ __n I
. I
i[ lL
I I
I !9 / I \
I
II
I "ft 1/ I
i \ I I
" I I I I I
I ~ I I I
, I
I I
I i
" I I
\
\ \ I I
\ I .:
1\ ~ I u I
. ~
I I I~ J
r
II
II
II I
II I
II I
II
II
II
II
II I
II ,
II It t I
II
II ~ ,
II ~ I
II I I - I
II
II (0 I
II I
II ,
~ II I m I
II ,~
- - II =#:: I ~ I
\ z ,
<( I (''''-)
----- I - f'-..
I ----- C rl/ ,
-----
I ----- w / I
--- ~ , I
,
-~ /-.-
I -- -f ,
'-
I I ,
, h.1.3.2H~ SIHl
+- 9"~HS 33S + 3NI1H01Vr-l
- '3N lH01VVi - - ,
.
, ~
I.l~Q~;' III
'. :; ~ f J 3 lep1J.XoJW[ '1Lj[~'\p;~ .{&lI][~(]I '908 "]IoS Q:wcg~ ex) it
... ,
=l ....
"'-
UOJ1tr:1J/!1nVdfb mU3(2lb 3J1UVj1lb 1S3(UJ :E >- . ~ ~~Hf
o 0)' j pi ~ iI'"
+:: ca II i~ hll~ I -I 1Uj
, 0 0) 1,lj ~~ f' s iti\ I
U:C h ~l ~ ili .Jl.I
~ Z~
-- ~ <(~
. -'- C\J
-'- ....I
I -'--. - , 1133,HS S'Hl ,....
=#: 0..<
I 3NIlH01.VW
Z W
<C
'" I ~ - o..i
m '0
(\J ,
I a W <C
I I ,.... <l ~ ()
,.... ~
\ ::tt: ..J CI)'i
z -......:::: ~ 0
<l Z
is ,
~ I <C z.~
I -
0 \ 0 <(~
I z
C) W
u ....I:
\ ?:: ~
I
I I
, \ w
~
\ ..J
>-
to
, ..J
iii
in
, , ):
, \ ~
&1\
\ x
w
2
,
, ,
, I
\ IS)
ci~ J
, =J:=-
1'\ , IS)
Ii ~
, w
m w
..J >-
'1 I ~ ~ /
~ ~
=J=~==
~ ,
{:. ,
/ I
, /"
It ,
f ~
OJ \.i
7~''--- Q I w
.- z
m , -1 ::i
(\J >-
~ , I-
::i
is I - iii
w .It in
I~ I: /I~ ):
\.i ~
S -q
&1\
X
, w
Cl
I ~
, is
w
I: ,
~ I
?:: I
II \ ~
(j)
(\I >-
0 Ie-
m ,
(\.\
I
~ ~)Tl
~ - , - - , ~ - , - - , ~ - , L~H~'Hl
uJ 3NI1H01.VW-
~
en
0' en
\- w
(\..\ a:
(!)
z
0
()
-
--
--
--
0 --
~s ::so --
--
--
--
--
. l:\ .~ \-\6i'4~
~~\"'\
'l
w
; i=... ~.
;
I ~I
;
I
I
I o~
i u.,
0
c
I Z
I 0
-
! ...
, 51
I ::>J
00'.
i <t'
i ~
:
;
I
I
i
i
I
I
r
I
I
!
i
,
,
;
c
,
...<< IIIw II> ... ...........::ll<h <:Ia;CIt~.QuO>wa;o;
..
~%tZ.:::)<<)41
.
- .
':C Wf:HT:2,0-S6ET (1T 'uEf LLf 1 L\7L LO\7 : '0:" :Jt:C/-!.:: tltl9h r dtj3f-<t:lcr'311C: : 1.,C:c~
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER t'Jt1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 9.r;. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2/SUN ART PAINTING CORPORATION
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995
This is before the Commission to consider Change Order No. 2 to
the contract with Sun Art Painting Corporation for revising the
specification on the coated steel painting at the Water Treatment
Plant. The revision includes adding a coat of urethane on the
steel surfaces (piping, handrails, etc. ) , and calls for a 28
calendar day time extension.
The total amount of this Change Order is $6,300. Funding is
available from Water & Sewer - Building Maintenance (Account No.
441-5143-536-46.10) .
Recommend approval of Change Order No. 2 to the contract with Sun
Art Painting Corporation.
~ tf& I
(Ilttui()) d;;xd
~)
~c
-~
Agenda Item No. 9 ,G.
AGENDA REOUEST
Date: January 10, 1995
Request to be placed on:
X Regular Agenda
special Agenda
Workshop Agenda When: January 17, 1995
Description of item (who. what. where. how much): Staff reauests
city Commission aooroval of Chanae Order #2 to the Contract with
Sun Art paintina Corooration on Repaintina the Water Treatment
Plant (Project #94-53). Work in this Chanae Order includes
aoolyina a 3 mil thickness coat of "Tnemec 74 Urethane" to all
steel surfaces - atmosoheric (system 4A). As per the base bid
apolication schedule. The reauest also includes a twenty-eiaht
(28) calendar day time extension. The total amount of this Chanae
Order is for $61300.00. Funding is available from the Water &
Sewer Fund: Division: Maintenance Account # 441-5143-536-46.10.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YE~DRAFT ATTACHED YE~~
Recommendation: Staff requests approval of Change Order to Sun Art
Painting corporation in the amount of $6,300.00 and extension of
time.
Department head signature: ~D"~_.f} ~
Determination of consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) :
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure
of funds): ~<~
Funding available:~/NO
Funding alternative " (if applicable) "
Account No. & Des~, r' ption441-Sf/!-6'-S2fo. 40-10 LN Am/?. Iv1AlNT - f3iUi-vJ N6!::J
Account Balance, 432.
City Manager Review: ',.
Approved for agenda: Nt,fSlNO /7~
Hold Until: (-
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
Memorandum
To: David T. Harden, City Manager
From: William H. Greenwood, Director of Environmental svcs.~~~
Date: January 10, 1995
Re: Repainting the Water Treatment Plant (94-53) Change
Order #2 for additional work
Attached is an agenda request for Commission approval of Change
Order #2 to Sun Art Painting for revising the specification on
the coated steel painting at the Water Treatment Plant for the
above referenced Project. The revision includes adding a 3 mil
(MDFT) coat of "Tnemec 74 Series Urethane" to all steel surfaces
outlined in the Contract which are exposed to atmospheric
conditions. The Change Order is for an add amount of $6,300.00;
and an additional twenty-eight (28) calendar days to the Contract
time
The existing paint system calls for 6-8 MDFT coating of Surface
Tolerant Epoxy Mastic. Adding the coat of polyurethane to these
surfaces will provide a glossier, more aesthetically pleasing
surface;and should increase the life of the paint system. Most
of the surfaces included are in a highly visible area of the
Water Treatment Plant.
The existing paint surfaces are epoxy coated. They have chalked
and faded due to prolonged exposure to the atmospheric elements.
Some of these surfaces were painted as recently as two years ago.
The price of $6,300.00 for this work has been reviewed by our
consultant, CH2MHill (see attached) and staff. They appear to be
reasonable for the proposed scope of work. Funding is available
for this Change Order from the Water Sewer Fund/Building
Maintenance account #441-5143-536-46.10.
CC . Dick Hasko, P.E., Deputy Director of Public utilities
.
Don Haley, Water Treatment Plant Manager
Howard Wight, Construction Manager
A:MEM09453.DOC
MEMORANDUM CNMHILL
-
TO: Howard Wight/Delray Beach
COPIES: Don Haley /Delray Beach 1""t"~'~IFFR1MG
Dick Hasko /Delray Beach DEe 1 3 1994
William Greenwood/Delray Beach
Jim Driscoll/ CH2M HILL/BOI
FROM: Tim Sharp / CH2M HILL
DATE: December 8,1994
SUBJECT: Change Order Request from SunArt
PROJECT: FL W30787.PT
We have reviewed the change order request from SunArt to apply a coat of urethane
on the steel surfaces at the Water Treatment Plant. Although the original paint
specification provides sufficient protection for the painted surfaces, the coat of
urethane will increase the life of the paint finish. During the preparation of the
technical specifications, the City's budgetary constraints were considered, and the
lasting of the finish was not an integral part of the design. Therefore, urethane
coating was not specified. However, if the City wishes to maintain the glossy finish
on the steel surfaces for a longer period of time, we recommend adding the coat of
urethane.
We also reviewed the contractor's cost for the urethane and it appears to be a fair
price.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
CHANGE ORDER TO ORIGINAL CONTRACT
CHANGE NO. 2 PROJECT NO. 94-53 DATE:
PROJECT TITLE: Repainting the Water Treatment Plant
TO CONTRACTOR: Sun Art paintinq Corporation
YOU ARE HEREBY REQUESTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN THE PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT AND TO PERFORM THE WORK
ACCORDINGLY, SUBJECT TO ALL CONTRACT STIPULATIONS AND COVENANTS.
JUSTIFICATION:
Revise system 4A coated steel atmosphere as follows:
1. spot prime bare metals (as specified in existing contract).
2. Full coat epoxy mastic (as specified in existing contract).
3. Additional coat of Tnemec 74 Series Urethane 5 mil
modification would be an additional cost of $6,300.00.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT AMOUNT
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $38,000.00
COST OF CONSTRUCTION CHANGES PREVIOUSLY ORDERED 9,840.00
ADJUSTED CONTRACT AMOUNT PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE ORDER 47,840.00
COST OF CONSTRUCTION CHANGES THIS ORDER 6,300.00
ADJUSTED CONTRACT AMOUNT INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER 54,140.00
PER CENT INCREASE/DECREASE THIS CHANGE ORDER +16.6 %
TOTAL PER CENT INCREASE/DECREASE TO DATE +42.5 %
EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME ALLOWED BY THIS CHANGE 28 CALENDAR DAYS
Repainting the Water Treatment Plant
project No. 94-53
Page 2
CERTIFIED STATEMENT:I hereby certify that the supporting cost data included
is, in my considered opinion, accurate; that the prices quoted are fair and
reasonable and in proper ratio to the cost of the original work contracted
for under benefit competitive bidding.
Sun Art Painting Corporation
(Sign & Seal)
TO BE FILLED OUT BY DEPARTMENT INITIATING CHANGE ORDER
Environmental Services 441-5143-536-46.10 Water Maint/Div Maint.
DEPARTMENT FUNDS BUDGETED CODE SOURCE
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
By its City Manager
RECOMMEND: By:
William H. Greenwood, Director David T. Harden, City Manager
of Environmental Services
ATTEST:
APPROVED: By:
City Attorney City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # q.lI. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 1995
APPOINT A LIAISON TO THE COMMUNITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE OF
STATE REPRESENTATIVE, WILLIAM ANDREWS
DATE: JANUARY 13 I 1995
This is before the Commission to consider appointing a liaison
between the City and State Representative William Andrews I
Community Affairs Committee for issues relating to State
government.
Recommend consideration of this proposal.
/,,:-',,- ... ,
~. ','- "" I I' l" '7 ' -L,'v,
- {.\..,., D'T Ii
. --r Iu>'/-c '4 h11...4t ,~'. / I 'c. {'I
!It'll
C/l'y < g
CO~ 1.9.9/
Florida House of Representatives I%1/S0';o,t'
Tallahassee, Florida
32399-1300
December 27, 1994
The Honorable Thomas E. Lynch
Mayor, City of Delray Beach
tOO NW 1 st A venue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Dear Mayor Lynch and Fellow Commissioners:
As you are aware, I 'am the new State Representative for District 87, which covers a
portion of Deiray Beach. As a former city commissioner. I am acutely aware of local
issues impacted by Florida Statutes that have lost their usefulness and, in fact, inhibit
cities from being inventive or, at the very least, up-to-date in the management and
operations of city government. The frustration I experienced as a city commissioner
led me to request Community Affairs as one of my House Committees. I have recently
been notified that I am assigned to that committee.
Since I will not have the time to attend as many of your meetings as I would like, I am
asking that you appoint a member of your body to be a direct liaison to me for issues
that concern you and are related to State government. I remember many times the
City Attorney blocking innovative approaches because of some statute. I want to
remove as many of those encumbrances as possible so that you can fully take
command of your city's problems through new approaches that can make you more
effective in solving local needs. Even if you come across a problem statute and you
can not wait for the legislature to take action, please notify me anyway as I am sure
the issue will come up again and cost some city, somewhere, from being more
effecti ve in their governing process.
Additionally, I have been appointed to Education, K-12 (Sub-committee on
Accountability & Governance), Regulated Industries, and Business & Professional
Regulation. I want to stress to you that the committee assignments do not limit the
impact I can have in other areas. I hope to be a leader in criminal justice reform as
well as education. I also feel that most House members are more than willing to work
on issues of equal concern so you should feel comfortable requesting that I look into
other areas of concern even though I may not be on the "Committee" that would
handle that issue.
My staff members are as follows: Cathy Watkins, Executive Secretary, (formerly with
Representative John Laurent) and Pam Hackett, Legislative Assistant, (formerly with
Senate President Jim Scott). Please feel free to refer to them as your needs arise,
Printed on Recyded Paper
> .
, -
--
~
The Honorable Thomas E. Lynch
and Fellow Commissioners
December 27, 1994
Page two
however; protocol requires that individual and specific local issues that only affect
one district be handled by the represen tati ve in that district. Beginning December
30, 1994, my district office mailing address will be:
777 E. Atlantic A venue, Suite 226
Delray Beach, Florida 33483
(407)279-1616
Thank you for your time and consideration as we follow the 1994 election mandate by
the voters to bring decision making back to local control.
s~ -yO----
William F. Andrews
Representative, District 87
WFA/cw
, '
[IT' DF DELRA' BEA[H
DELIA Y BEACH CITY CLERK DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 407/243-7000
' 1 0 . I D A 100 N,W, 1st AVENUE . .
......
qur
1993
January 19, 1995
The Honorable William F. Andrews
777 East Atlantic Avenue, Suite 226
Delray Beach, FL 33483
Re: Appointment of Liaison
Dear Mr. Andrews:
I am pleased to inform you that Commissioner Barbara D. Smith was
appointed by the City Commission on January 17, 1995, to serve as
liaison between the City and your office for issues related to State
government.
Sincerely yours,
IF~Q --r( ~,~
DAVID T. HARDEN
City Manager
DTH:amb
cc: Commissioner Barbara D. Smith
and. doc
@ Printed on Recycled Paper THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 9. r. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
APPOINTMENT TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
There is an outstanding vacancy on the Code Enforcement Board for
an alternate member (real estate position). The term is for three
(3 ) years, ending January 14, 1998.
All board members must be residents of the City. Also, whenever
possible, regular and alternate members shall include an architect,
a businessperson, an engineer, a general contractor, a
subcontractor, and a realtor. Per the City Code, the realtor is to
be licensed under the laws of the State licensing real estate
brokers as either a broker or a salesperson, or will possess
similar qualifications under the laws of other states, or will have
actual experience deemed by the Commission to be equivalent to
licensing. While it is desirable to have such representation, it
is not mandatory.
The following individuals have applied for the real estate
position:
B. Hilary Carpenter
Adele S. King
Richard LiCastri
Chris Stray
Stanley Watsky
The following laypeople have also applied:
Martin Bellsey
P. Richard Brautigan
David Cohen
Sidney Soloway
Anthony Veltri
Pursuant to Commission direction, a check for code violations and
municipal liens has been conducted. None were found.
The appointment will be made by Mayor Lynch (Seat #5).
Recommend appointment of an alternate member to the Code
Enforcement Board for a term ending January 14, 1998.
ref:agmemo2
01-10-95 15:32 312 P02
,...: ~ _.- ". - - - .... -. - ~.. ~ - - -. - -..- .. . ... - ... .
-- - -- - - .... -.
~1l/09/95 .. - -- - .- - - - '. - - - .
16:01 '0'407 2"13 3774 (' I T Y /DELf<A Y 8CH. laJ 002
CITY OF nElRAY BEACH
80ARD MEM!F.R APrL [CATION
-, '-.--
NA."tl! --.lI. Q.:U,..q Carpenter __ . ., ...-. - --..-,-, - - . .-, - ..
333 Patm Tr..:ll. nelr!j...BeQCh, n 33483., .-... - - -
HOMJo: ADDRESS (Street, ,1ty, Zip Clld!:'.! l:mTRF.S(r)J~~c'F:)'.
1177 CtAu.L.Iush.Blvd., Suite 101. .D~lr~y,Be~h..a~FJ,.1l483 -
PRiNCIPAL 1)I,:Sll'l':SS ADDRESS (Slr~"t. L~t:... Zi~, CoJe) -.
HOME PHONE 4071 272-7168 BUSINESS PltONE _ 4071.. Zl.8:-043L
-
ON WHAT IWAKO!l ARE \'()U TNTERE:STI::D l~ Sl:.HING Code Enforcement Board
- ._-- .-----.- - -
...... .. -----.. - - -". .-. -,..-- . -
. . .--- ------ . .. .-
L HiT ALL CITY BOAUlS ()N Wln CH YOl' ARE C~'RFl.ENTL Y Sf':HVlNG Oft HAvE lJRt:VIOl.'~l.~'
SERVED (Plea.. in~l~~. d.c..)
_ Rone ___ -.... .. - -- . _..~ . -.- -- - -.,. .-
tDlJCATlONAL QUAl. HICATIONS Lake Foresl: Colle.I!...J~~~._ Psychology and Art B1sto-ry)
1989 -. ..- ----_.._.~ -
- ...-. .-....--- ........-..- - ... ,- ..- -. . - -
LIST Al'ty RELATtD t'~U~'ES~lONAL CERTHICATI(l~S ASD I.!CF.SSeS WHICH \,()t: HOLD
ReAltax A.8ociace - - ..- . .-. - - . . --.. - - -- -
~;Ivt Y()IJR yltl!StNT, OR MOST RECENT EMPtOYF.~, A~[) I-'OSI7IOS Alt.on. T1e~n _
& Illy. Inc.. llealtoUas.~___. .... . -.
DESCRIbE Er.FtUENCES. SKIU.S OR KNOWI.EDeiE .....HICH qL:AU n nl~'rO S~...vE ON 'fit 1 "
tJOAH.V
\.t 1'!."AAd haltor ..8ociate 8inc:u~~1_ C;~c~ntT.!-t;l!!& i'1_ Delr:'1 )~.!!",ch. -- -
-., . -
--- .-...---.--- --.. -
PLEASE ATTACH A IlI!F l!S~,
L HE~E8Y C~"T1FY THAT ALL THE ABOVE stATEMENTS ARE tRUE. AND I AGREE ~i:)
UNnF;RSTANP THAT ANY MISSTATEMENT OF 1"....T!:UAL FACTS CONTAINED I.N THiS A.PPll,~"'.
1" ON MA't CAUSE FORFEITURE I.'PON MY r~R r OF I\~" A.ppnIN~f.NT t MA't' REC1::l VI::.
_J.waan ,10, 1995 -.
DATE
..111"
1211-1121-95 15:32 312 pm
, ' . .
B. Hilary Carpenter
333 Palm Trail, Dclray Beach, Florida 33483
(407) 272-7168
Work Experience: Allmon, Tieman & Ely, Inc., Delray Beach, FL
Marketing Coordinator / Realtnf Associate (May 1992)
January 1992 - Present
. Create and track alllldvctti...ing for oceanfront market
. Maintain C(llTespond~nce or advertising and activity tu aUI clients
. Managc distributiun uf marketing to over 500 prospects
. Responsible for tracking all dosing procedures for oceanfront listings
. Created aruJ launched quarterly company magazine of all listings
Sutro & Co., San Francisco, CA
Personnel Assistant
January 1991 - August 1991 (Temporary for October - November)
. Managed employee education of new insurance and human resource ptocedlU'es
. Processed uncmpl()ytncnt, disability, bank and employment verifications
. Created spreadsheet for mall.1icment analysis of insurance rates and individual policies
. Developb1 alld rcotganized employee tiliug system (or department
. Administered Hun1M Resource and insuran,:e daims
___0 0 ---- Davidoff.' White Good, Inc., Westpod, CT - - ._- --- . _ __. __ ..__
Administrative Assistant - Account Coordinator (Domino's Piu.a Account)
June 1989 . September 1990
. Liaison for Account Executives and clients ()( rourteen ADI's
. Crcated chans and graphs for market analysi$ for spcdfic pizza competition
. l't'epared quarterly marketing plan.~ and meetings
. Trained replaccmcnt and Slunmer interns
. Promuted to Account Coordi nator within one year
Skills: . Strength in development and management of projects
. Exccllent communication and managcment skills
. Knowledlc of Wordt'erfect 6.0, Professional Write, Lotw. 1-2-3, Multimate,
Word Star, Mackintosh: Mkrosoft Word and Excel
. Community involvement: American Heart Association Walk-a-than, Boca Raton Teen
Center, Child Watch, Junior League Showhousc 1994, Veterans Park volWlteer and
Little Leaguu Soccer - Ass't. Coach
Education: Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and Art History
Lake Forest Cc)Uegc, Lake Porest, JL
Graduated May 1989
References Available Upon Request
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i q~ - MEETING OF DECEMBER 6. 1994
RESOLUTION NO. 5-95/ALTERNATIVE 3A-2. INTERSTATE 95/PALM
BEACH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DIRECT CONNECTOR
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
This is before the Commission to consider Resolution No. 5-95 in
support of the construction of a direct connector between
Interstate 95 and Palm Beach International Airport, known as "Build
Alternative 3A-2".
You have in your backup material correspondence from County
Commissioner McCarty requesting the City's support for this
project, as well as letters from Mayor Nancy M. Graham and
Commission President Howard Warshauer of West Palm Beach urging the
Ci ty not to support the proposed interconnect in any way. Also
included is a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning
Department that support for Alternative 3A-2 is appropriate.
Recommend consideration of Resolution No. 5-95.
~ 5-0
ref:agmemol0
I ,
I
RESOLUTION NO. 5-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PROJECT NO.
93220-1465, BUILD ALTERNATIVE 3A-2, INTERSTATE
95/PALM BEACH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DIRECT
CONNECTOR.
WHEREAS , Interstate 95 is the primary north/south surface
transportation corridor linking all coastal urban areas in Palm
Beach, Martin, St. Lucie, Broward and Dade Counties; and
WHEREAS, the Florida State Department of Transportation
(FDOT) has conducted comprehensive studies, and determined that
improvements in Interstate 95 and connecting roads, including a
direct connector to Palm Beach International Airport, are necessary
to accommodate existing and future vehicle traffic demands along the
Interstate 95 corridor; and
WHEREAS, FDOT cost estimates state that Build Alternative
3A-2 is the least costly to the taxpayers of Palm Beach County,
saving county taxpayers an estimated $11 million over other build
alternatives; and
WHEREAS, the Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning
Organization has voted in favor of the Interstate 95/Palm Beach
International Airport Direct Connector as part of its 5-year road
improvement program; and
WHEREAS , the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach,
Florida, finds that improvements to Interstate 95 and connecting
roads, including a direct connector to Palm Beach International
Airport, will ensure that Palm Beach County residents and visitors
will have access to, and continue to receive the benefits associated
with, efficient and convenient transportation for goods and people.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City Commission of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, supports the Palm Beach County long range
transportation plan improvements to Interstate 95 with a direct
connector between Interstate 95 and the Palm Beach International
Airport, known as "Build Alternative 3A-2".
I ,
)
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this 17th day of
January, 1995. ~~
+rAYOR
AT7lLcn 'flJu-1wp lIaJ1;j
City Clerk
-2- Res. No. 5-95
, . . . (K
t~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVID HARDEN
CITY MANAGER ~ ~
FROM: DIANE DOMINGUEZ J ~ ~ ~ ~
DIRECTOR OF PLA NING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE I-95/PALM BEACH
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DIRECT CONNECTOR
DATE: JANUARY 9, 1995
The City Commission has been asked to pass a resolution
supporting the construction of a direct connector between
Interstate 95 and the Palm Beach International Airport. The
project, referred to as Alternative 3A-2, would provide a
separate interchange for access to and from the airport, instead
of the indirect access that now exists off of Belvedere Road and
Southern Boulevard. It also involves modifications to improve
the traffic movements onto and off of the Belvedere Road
interchange. The cost of the project (approximately $60
million) is to be paid from federal, state, and airport funds.
The population growth projected in Palm Beach County through the
year 2020 will result in traffic volumes that will place a
severe strain on the transportation network, especially on 1-95.
That growth will increase the utilization of PBIA as well,
affecting its overall efficiency and functionality. An
important component to improving that efficiency is the
direct connection between the airport and the interstate highway
system. Not only will the connection allow for improved access
to the airport, it will also keep thousands of trips off of the
County's road system, thereby improving the capacity and
efficiency of those roadways.
Of the alternatives considered, Alternative 3A-2 is considered
to have the lowest cost and the least impact on the surrounding
areas. It is estimated that it will save the County $11 million
in the long run by eliminating the need to make expensive
upgrades to the County road system.
Given the projected traffic volumes and the available
alternatives, it is appropriate that the City Commission
express support for Alternative 3A-2.
. ~ , I {-::t 'I'D bltl :rt'~
B~rd of County Commissioners l / /It ~ Ja. County Administrator
Ken 1. Foster, Chairman Robert Weisman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus .
Carol A. Roberts
~nHN~ ~
Mary McCarty c.(] .J 0
Maude Ford Lee Clr 199.,
YCo
December 27, 1994
The Honorable Thomas E. Lynch
Mayor, City of Delray Beach and
Members of the City Commission
100 N.W. F. st Avenue
Delray B a~~~33444
Dear a~O~ynch:
The purpose of my letter is to request your support for the
Florida Department of Transportation Project known as
Alternative 3A-2, Interstate 95/paLm Beach International
Airport Direct Connector.
Population growth in southeast Florida and Palm Beach
County has brought I-95 near the Airport and connecting
roadways to operating levels near or over capacity. The
recommended alternative will provide the increased vehicle
traffic capacity needed to support existing and future
demand in the most cost effective manner, utilizing
budgeted 80% federal funds, and 20% state and airport
funds. If Alternate 3A-2 is not approved, it could cost
County taxpayers $11 million to upgrade County roads to
meet traffic demands, and the federal dollars dedicated for
construction will go elsewhere if FDOT decides to stop the
project.
I am req~~stin; th~t your ~ity Cc~ission pass a ~eGcluticn
in support of the project which can be submitted in time
for the Department of Transportation Public Bearing on
Wednesday, January 25, 1995 at the West PaLm Beach
AuditoriUlll at 7:00 P.If. Suggested language for the
resolution is attached.
Also enclosed is a copy of "Status Report - I-95 Airport
Director Connector" which gives an overview of the FOOT's
determination of the need for the improvements.
For the benefit of all Palm Beach County residents and
visitors who will be served by this practical and
convenient transportation al ternati ve, I encourage your
support of this project.
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@pnnted""rllC)'CledP8P8' P.o. Box 1989 West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-1989 (407) 355-2030 FAX: (407) 355-3982
I
The Honorable Thomas E. Lynch and
Members of the City Commission
Page Two
I
Please send your resolution to my attention, or call for
the document to be picked up prior to the hearing date, and
don't hesitate to contact me at 276-1220 for additional
information.
MM: gmr
cc: David Harden, City Manager
w/Enclosures
@ printed on recycled paper
.
.
. .
. . . ..
.
Stohl, R'J'Q1f
1-9$/AI'1oll DlnCl Omnltlo,
BACKGROUND The projected population of Palm Beach
COunty in 2020 is 1,426,900 (Palm Beach
Interstate 95 (l-9S/SR 9) is a north-south County MPO: 1989) which represents I
limited access facility' connecting urban sustained growth rate of 2.S percent per
centers of the eastern United States from year . Employment in south Palm Beach
Maine to Florida. Connectine the Dade, County is also anticipated to grow at 7.S
Broward, and Palm Beach Tri~unty area, percent per year.
the 1-9S corridor also provides the primary
north.soulh service for local and reiional This &rowth in population has been renected
traffic in southeast Florida. in traffic volumes alone 1-9S. Between
1980 and 1991 the 1.9' mainline volumes
The southeast Florida rei ion has undetlone between Forest Hills Boulevard and
explosive growth in the lut ten years. Southern Boulevard have increased from
From 1980 to 1991 population in Palm annual average daily traffIC (AADl) of
Beach County increased (rom 576,800 10 68,'00 to 133,800. Accordingly, the
883,000 in 1991, an increase of 4.5 percent AADT in 2020 is expected to be 183,800,
per YW'. A similar growth rate is forecut reference Figure 1. In order to provide
to continue through the yeM 2020. transportation infrastructure and seMus
concurrent with this anticipated future
"&U1'e 11 TnJfIc Trends and Forecasts 1-9$
Trends Analysts
I-IS: '-'-' .... ......, \e awt_.. .1....
-
..
..
1 J :
-
.
.
- - - - - - - - -
~...
...~ "',,,r'GI c.""". -~,.
_. - ......... -, ~ -.....
. - .. -." ---. ";. -. .." ............~.........L.. '"... ...... ~ - - .
1
- -
.. .
. .
Skltu, 1t"Off: 1-'SI,4/rpoff Dlnd C4""'d~'
demand, several improvements have bceft 1ft ordet .0 provide transportadOft
identified In state and lellonal transportation infrastructure and suvices concurreat with
plans alone 1-9S in Palm Beach Count)' to thI. anticipated need, the proposed
address this need. The Florida Department improvements will enhance the operation of
01 Transportation is currently pJannJ", &he roadway network in Palm Beach Councy
improvements co che 1-9S corridor throulb by: .
Palm Beach County u part of the 1-9$ Hllh
Occupancy Vehicle (HOY) [nlerclum" . Jmprovinc the operation of Che 1.95
Impro'lt"ltl'lll G1Id RlJilroDd Crossin, mainline and
EJlmiNJlion Study. Numerous aJternatives to . implOvin, che operation or the adjacent
improve the existin& interehan&es between roadway network.
1-9' and the arterial.coDectot system are
provided in the study. The proposed PROJECT LIMiTS
improvemenu are also identified in the Palm
Beach Cou1lly ComprtMnsive Pfall. The limits of this project, or the project
study area, consists of the 5e&ment 01 '.9'
Southern Boulevard, Belvedere Road, between Southern Boulevard and Belvedere
Australian Avenue, and 1.9S are currently Road, inclusive 01 the Interchan&cs and
operatina neat or over capacity. As traffic connectinc roadways In this 5e&mtnt. The
volume$ and aceompan)'inl levels or roadways considered include:
concestJon 1ft this acea Increue, it will
become necessary to provide teliet to the . Southern Boulevard:
IocaJ roadway system concunent with 1-9510 Gem Lake Road
anticipated traffic &rowth. . Belvedere Road
1-95 10 Australian Avenue
Additionally, 1.9' between Southern . Australian Avenue
Boulevud and Belvedere Road has Gem Lake Road to Belvedere Road
experienced an accident rate lreater than
adjacent se&ments of I.". Ovu the period ALTERNATIVES
of 198"-1986, 211 accidents and 6 latalities
occurred In this 5e&rneftl Five alternative coneepu were initiaDy
OBJECTIVES developed 10 addRss the need to improve
operations alOfte the 1-95 <:orridor and the
The 1-95 corridor and the intuchan&es of roadway network proyidinc IOCCSJ to PBIA.
However, onl)' two alternatives were
Ihe providin. aeass to the Palm Beacb considered viable and were carried tMOUlh
InternationaJ Airport are andclpated 10 encineerine evaluations.
operate at deficient levels or service u a
result or &rowtJa In traffic. The local Alternative t This aJternative provides
roadway netwOrk is also expccled to opcnte
at deficient levels 01 setviee as the . a braided ramp system in boch
community continues to crow. directions of 1-9' Co eliminate
wuvin..
.
2
.
r",..-,o- ~... .V. ..-JIQ ....
.
.. ., ..'
Stat", RIPOff: 1-9SIA1,.,otf Dil'fd Connie/of'
. a nfover ramp from northbound 1-95 . improvCl tnftlc on J-9S by
to westbound Southern Boulevard, diminatina weaving sections with .
. a flyovu ramp from eastbound braided ramp system
Belvedere Road to northbound 1-95,
and Altcmative-3A-2
. a &rade separated interchanse at the
intersection of AustnJian Avenue . meets aU specified encineerins
and Turnage Boulevard.. criteria and remedies existing and
. improves Southern Boulevard and anticipated deficiencies
Belvedere Road between 1-9' and . provides a direct connector roadway
Australian Avenue between 1-9' and PBIA
. requires approximateJy 12. nacres
Alternative 3A.2 This alternative provide$ o( riehr-ot-wa)'
. has the lower cost and impact on
. a braided ramp system in both surroundinlland uses
directions of 1-95 to eliminate . improves traffic conditions alon,
weavinc, and Southern Boulevard, Belvedere
. a directional ramp system between I- Road, and Australian Avenue by
95 and PBIA. removing traffic travelJinc between
1-9S and PBIA
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES . improves traffic on 1.95 by
eUmit\atin, weavinc seaions with .
The Alternative I and Alternative 3A-2 were braided ramp system
evaluated for their ability to remedy existing
and anticipated deficiencies, CI1gineerin, Right-o(-way and construction toSU (or
performance, anticipated social, Altematiye I and 3A.2 are shown in
environmental, and economic impacts, and Table 1.
richt-o(-way and construction COSl!. The FONDING
(ollowing summarize.s the result! of the
evaluation. Alternative 3A.2 is fully funded rhrouCh
federal and state SOurw lor desip and
Alrero~tive 1 right-of-way costs. EJements 01 Alternative
1 are not eligible lor Federal and slate
. meets all specified enc1neerinl funding. Punding Irom local sources b
~riteria and remedies existinS and required rot the elements which are not
anticipated deficiencies covered by Federal or state sources.
. imprOVe! the Southern Boulevard and
Belvedere Road interchan&e$ with
1.95
. provides a crade separated
interchange at Australian Avenue and
Turnlle Boulevard
. requires approximately 24.71 acres
oC riCht-ol-way
3
~J
P. O. Box 3366 "",,_
West Palm Beach, Florida 33402 R E eEl V E D ~ \ ~
Tel: 407/659-8000 . 'W ~.
JAN 6 f995 EVERYBODY
CITY M/"" ~-~..., n~-FiC[ COO"TS
I ! ~ Wt# Pd.... gu.d.!
Ja:ftilJa~l1i4 ptJJ.'9 9 5 SPEClflL CEnsus 1995
David Harden
City Manager
City of Delray Beach
100 N.W. First Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Dear Mr. Harden:
It is the understanding of this office that many of the County's
municipalities have received a communication from the Office of County
Commissioner Mary McCarty encouraging the municipalities to consider and
approve resolutions in support of the proposed I-95/Airport Interconnect.
As the City most affected by the project, and in fact, by the general
operations of the Airport, I feel it is important for you to be aware of
the position of the City of West Palm Beach. In December 1991, the West
Palm Beach City Commission approved Resolution No. 227-91 in opposition
of the project. In short, the Commission felt, and still feels, that the
expenditure of over $60 million of public tax dollars is entirely
unwarranted and will have an adverse economic effect on the residential
tax base of the City. Over $16.5 million of the estimated $60 million
will be used to purChase/condemn additional residential properties in
the City further destroying viable residential neighborhoods to the east
of Palm Beach International Airport (PBIA).
Further, the citizens of this City see the proposed interconnect as
precedent to major expansion at the Airport to include expanded cargo
and international operations. Many of the neighborhoods in proximity to
the Airport do not feel that PBIA is an appropriate location for these
kinds of activities.
We, therefore, in the spirit of cooperation among communities in the
County, urge you not to support the proposed interconnect in any way.
Thank you for your support on this matter.
Sincerely,
i )l(J/~
Naa::!' M. Graham
Mayor of West Palm Beach
NMG/JLG/daw
cc: City Commission
City Administrator
County Commission
P. 0, Box 3366 ~
RECEIVED ~~
West Palm Beach, Florida 33402
Tel: 407/659-8000 JAM 1 3 1995
EVERYBODY
CITY MA~'{ ~:-r:)'~ nFFICE COU"TS
.:.,. Wt->> Pk~!
"The O.:fchid Ci~ 11 SPECIAL (E"SUS 1995
anua I 1995
Palm Beach County Municipalities:
The 1-95 interchange proposed to be built in the City of West Palm
Beach is another step in the continuing erosion of our city. I
plead to your civic pride and the sense that the destruction of
more neighborhoods in the county seat is a detriment to all of Palm
Beach County.
We do not need this interchange! What we do need is a second rail
for tri-rail, a modern and progressive intermodal transfer
facility, a county bus system that is second to none and greater
sensitivity to the destruction of our inner-city neighborhoods. The
airport has already destroyed the beautiful historic Hillcrest
neighborhood. Now they are destroying the beautiful Golfview
neighborhood. Next year it will be the neighborhoods under the
interchange.
Please help us in this fight to preserve our historic city that
just celebrated our centennial. Please do not support this
interchange!
Thanks in advance for your neighborliness. It won't be forgotten.
Since~~.
:a.~
~ ~
Howard Warshauer
President of the Commission
HW/ms
cc: Mayor
City Commission
City Administrator
Board of County Commission
County Administrator
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Neighborhood Associations
c>(
. ttX1
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA - CITY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - JANUARY 17. 1995 - 6:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 P.M.
COMMISSION CHAMBERS
AGENDA ADDENDUM
THE REGULAR AGENDA IS AMENDED TO INCLUDE:
9.K. DELRAY BEACH RAILROAD STATION PROJECT: Consider Worthing Park
site for the railroad station, and authorization, of City
resources to develop a site plan and a foundation plan for the
project.
c0 ;v-~-
ftC vr /'
~ ~'~ 0Jf
. ct' vP~ (tP ~
~)~ ~ ~v I ~
Jt ~~ ? I
(v Jo 6~ .
&~I~
RECEIVED
JAN 1 7 1995
The Honorable Tom Lynch, Mayor CI TY M~" . ,,' f)cF/CE January 16, 1995
City of DeIray Beach
RE: Delray Beach Railroad Station Project
Greetings,
We have evaluated several practical sites for the permanent location of .
Delray Beach's historic FEe Railroad Station and have concluded that a site in
Worthing Park would be the most uSeful. Weare developing a plan to use the
Station as a Visitor's Information Center on Atlantic A venue in the heart of the
downtown. Will the City Commission provide a permanent site in Worthing
Park. for the Railroad Station?
The DeIray Beach Historical Society has committed funds to purchase and
relocate the Station. The amOlmt of-that cormnitment is estimated at $ 20,000.
The Historic Palm Beach CoUnty Preservation Board has prepared a complete
set of measured drawings of the Sta~on and will continue to participate in the
planning and restoration phases of the project. The Preservation Board is currently
developing several options for using the interior and a preliminary estimate for the
cost of restoration of the Station. Also, the Preservation Board will assist in
preparing a state historic preservation matching grant for the restoration of the
Station, if that is necessary.
At this time, we are prepared 'to move forward with the drafting of a Site Plan
and a Foundation Plan for the permanent location at Worthing Park. A preliminary
estimate of a new foundation for the Station is $ 7,500. Will the City Commission
authorize City resources to devel~ a Site Plan and a Foundation Plan for the
Station?
Sincerely,
:Jj t:' h C t.C. I l <2- 1"'
Bob Cullen I Fritz Devitt
Project Coordinator Delray Beach Historical Society
278-7601 276-7436
cc: John Johnson
Bill Wood
Chris Brown
January 16, 1995 RECEIVED
JAN 1 7 1995
From - Bob CuUen CITy M/f" ,
To - Fritz Devitt-Delray Beach Historical Society -"" nFFlCE
SUBJECT -- Schedule --Delray Train Depot
Fritz, preliminary this is, but we need to start somewhere.
I am proposing the fol1owing schedule of events so we have some idea of
what needs to be done to complete this project. Obviously there will be
"other" events that will alter the plan.-----however
EVENT DATE
Make final site selection FEBRUARY 1, 1995
Site Plan/Foundation-(Cost sponsor ???) February 15. 1995
Purchase Depot February 28. 1995
Contract for Moving Building March 1, 1995
Contract for Foundation March 1, 1995
0 Move Building ( Midnite ) March 31,1995
Initial renovation (rough work) April 1 thru 30
o Welcome Home "Celebration"
Renovation IPreservation Work May 1. 199 S
o Centennial Dedication October 30, 1995
o = a planned City event
~kJCuU~
Bob CuUen--
Copies to-- City of Delray Beach/Chamber of Commerce/Preservation Board
2, 1 B., 1l,<D I
.
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i/o.A. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 5-95
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995
This is second reading and public hearing for Ordinance No. 5-95
which amends Chapter 96, "Fire Safety and Emergency Services", of
the City Code by revising definitions and implementing a fee
structure for emergency medical transportation for Advanced Life
Support (ALS) patients and Basic Life Support (BLS) patients. It
also designates the Fire Department as the provider for ALS and
emergency medical services in the City of Delray Beach.
At first reading on January 3, 1995, the City Commission passed the
ordinance by a vote of 4 to 1 (Mrs. Smith, Mr. Ellingsworth, Mr.
Randolph and Mayor Lynch voting fori Or. Alperin dissenting).
Staff was asked to complete an analysis of the costs involved with
providing this service for comparison with the service fees
proposed for adoption under the ordinance. This has been done and
is provided with this agenda item.
Recommend consideration of Ordinance No. 5-95 on second and final
reading.
fOhld!- 'Itd/
(~ ~ruL
~)
ref:agmemo14
, ,
, )
" ,
ORDINANCE NO. 5-95
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 96, "FIRE
SAFETY AND EMERGENCY SERVICESH, SUBHEADING HEMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES", SECTION 96.65, "DEFINITIONS", TO
PROVIDE FOR REVISED DEFINITIONS FOR THE TERMS HBASIC
LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES" AND "ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT";
REPEALING SECTION 96.66, "EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES;
FEES"; ENACTING A NEW SECTION 96.66, "EMERGENCY
MtDICAL TRANSPORTATION FEES", TO PROVIDE FOR FEES FOR
EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION, AND FOR ANNUAL
ADJUSTMENTS PURSUANT TO THE INFLATION INDEX CHARGE;
REPEALING SECTION 96.67, "BILLING AND COLLECTION OF
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE FEES; COSTS AND ATTORNEYS'
FEES"; ENACTING A NEW SECTION 96.67, "COLLECTION OF
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE FEES H , TO PROVIDE FOR A
METHOD FOR COLLECTION OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
FEES; ENACTING A NEW SECTION 96.68, "EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES AND ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT PROVIDER",
TO DESIGNATE THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
AS THE PROVIDER FOR ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT AND
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A REPEALER CLAUSE,
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach,
Florida, desires to maintain the high level of emergency medical
services currently provided to the residents of the City of Delray
Beach by the Fire Department of the City of Delray Beach; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has
determined that in order to continue the level of emergency medical
services currently enjoyed by the citizens of the City of Delray Beach
that emergency transportation services should be provided for Advanced
Life Support patients, and Basic Life Support patients; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach is
desirous of implementing a fee structure for emergency medical
transportation for Advanced Life Support patients and Basic Life
Support patients; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has
also expressed its intent that patient care is of primary concern and
that an individual'S ability to pay the fees shall not affect the
quality of the care rendered; and
, I
" )
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach,
Florida, is desirous for the Fire Department to provide advanced life
support and all manner of emergency medical services and
transportation in and for the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Title IX, .General Regulations ", Chapter
96, aFire Safety and Emergency Services", Subheading "Emergency
Medical Services., Section 96.65, "Definitions", of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is
hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 96.65 DEFINITIONS.
For the purposes of this subchapter, the following
definitions shall apply:
I"J . 1J'~)ffJ8;lJ;~'~~1 I I IJ8"~;lf/,1 I I 1f.;l'~1 I I I~T/J,,~p..11 I I 1~~p..Y;lf/,~~Y I
JllISJif)5t1.1._)51.;. 1)5;.,-t~ 11.1.1.;' 1;.~-p-prJJtt I;.;.tyt~;.;. I;.t;. ItJli;. I;.;,.;.ttj;.ft~t 1;,.;.~t~;.1.
;.;.tyt_;''-I-ptllSyt~;.~/)5tltJli;'If/,tttl'-I'tt;'I';.-p;.tt;,.;.ftt/~Jlit~JliItft_;I~~;.I-p;.tt;'1ft
,y;.1.~;.ttllS1f 1;.'tyt~;.;.J 1)5~t l~lIS lJillSt It;.ft~tt;. 1;.~J'tt1ft;.tt;.t;t~1f I lIS 1. Itt;.;.t;,.;.Jit
;,;.tyt_;.;. IlISt 1~;,;./lIS1. l_lISJi;.~J't;.)j1.;. IlISt 1~";.-pllS;,;.)j1.;. 1;,~-p-p1.t;';.1 IIJfllSftf)j,.;I;I;.)j;I;.
~;.1.1.;. l~lIS~1.~ ItJi_1-~~;.J 1)5~t IftllSt 116;' l1.tJ't1-t;.~ ItllSJ I;.;.;.;.;.;.;,.;.ftt l1.lISt l~lISJ't;,.jlSft
J't;.~"_;.1. l_lISJ't-p1.;.,.Jit;. I [;,lISt;. ItJlitllS;.t;.J 11.;.y;.tJ IJIi;.;.~;._Jli;.;. I;.Ji~ IlIStJli;.t 1_~J'tJ'tllSft
JillSftf1.t1.;. ItJl1t,;.t,JitJitj I;' t1.;,.;.ftt;.J , 1;.;.;.t;.ttJis I y~;.)t;.t;. I,,~ty I;.ft~ I Ytt,t;.t;.
"~t1 1~;.tt;.Jit;. ItJl1;.t l~lIS lJillSt It;.ft~tt, I';.t;.~;.~t~ 1;.~_jlS~~;.ftt~;.ftt ItjlS I;'
tt_;.tJ't;.Jitl1.;._t1.ttt'/J't;.~t_;.1.I;.1.;.tJ't/;.Ji~/~ttIJli;.Jisf~-pltJiY;';.ttS;.ttllSJi;.'I;.ft~
~;.;.;.;,ltJiYllS1.ytJis/-p;.tt;.Jitl;.;.;.;.,-;.J't;.Jit/~"tJl1/tt;.;.tJ't;.fttlt;.1.~;';'1.1
1Al I~J "BASIC LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES II. Basic life support
services include the provision of treatment services, IlISt It)i;. 1l4'-;. IlISt
;lISJi'-l4J't;.)51.;. IlISt l~t'--pllS'-;.)51.;. 1;.l4-p-p;It;.;. 1~Jl1t~)i l~jlS lJillSt Itt;., ItjlS ItJl1;. 11.'''1;'1- IlIS1.
t._ l~tllSY t,- tllSJi I lIS 1. I ;,~y;.Ji~;.~ I ;It1. _ I '-}6.-p~lIStt I ,-;.ty t~;.;. I I I~;.;. t~ I ;It1.;. I ;.}6.-pplIS tt
;.;.tyt~,;. I;.t;. I;,;.tyt~;.;. rendered to' patients which do not require
invasive techniques, which include, but are not limited to, simple
bandaging, minor splinting and simple immobilization. and may include
transportation to a hospital by the Delray Beach Fire Department.
- 2 - Ord. No. 5-95
, I
I
l
1.IU. Iftl · ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES". Advanced life
support services are those types of patient treatment services which
require advanced medical therapy, including, but not limited to:
electrocardiographic monitoring; use of external pacemakers;
defibrillation; intravenous therapy; medication administration;
cardiopulmonary resuscitation; endotracheal intubation; ;'9P~~q;~~
;fJit14J1S_ttSlSJiI IJSJi;1411\_tt~ I_Jit;f_tiSlS~)t li;.tlli;ttt I lY.I"/~/111 /_JSJS"l-t~;.ttSlSttl /_tt~
other advanced airway and artificial ventilator techniques: and may
include transportation to a hospital by the Delray Beach Fire
Department.
Section 2. That Title IX, "General Regulations ", Chapter
96, .Fire Safety and Emergency Services", Subheading "Emergency
Medical Services., Section 96.66, "Emergency Medical Services; Fees",
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, is
hereby repealed in its entirety, and a new Section 96.66, "Emergency
Medical Transportation Fees", is hereby enacted to read as follows:
Section 96.66 EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION FEES.
1.Al The followinq service charges or fees are levied for
the provision of emerqency medical transportation:
ill Advanced Life Support
transportation fee 8275.00
ill Basic Life Support
transportation fee 8205.00
ill Mileaqe fee 8 S.OO/mile
1.IU. The City Commission may adjust fees annually pursuant
to the Inflation Index Charqe (I.I.C.) which is used by Medicare to
determine the appropriate fee charqes.
Section 3. That Title IX, .General Regulations", Chapter
96, .Fire Safety and Emergency Services", Subheading IIEmergency
Medical Services., Section 96.67, "Billing and Collection of Emergency
Medical Service Fees; Costs and Attorneys' Fees II, of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, is hereby repealed in
its entirety, and a new Section 96.67, .Collection of Emergency
Medical Service Fees", is hereby enacted to read as follows:
- 3 - Ord. No. S-95
t
Section 96.67 COLLECTION OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE FEES.
1Al The Fire Department shall submit bills to patients or
to the patient' s insurance carrier for the provision of Basic Life
Support or Advanced Life Support transportation.
1al Any bill remaininq unpaid for a period of ninety (90)
days shall be considered delinquent. Any delinquent bill shall incur
interest at the rate of nine percent (9%) per annum. The notice of an
interest charge shall be included on the initial bill mailed to the
patient.
iCl The City may collect delinquent charqes through any and
all available legal remedies.
.uu. The City Finance Department is hereby authorized to
accept assiqnment at the maximum allowable rate of Medicaid. Medicare.
and the Palm Beach County Health Care District benefits.
1.E.l The City Finance Department is hereby authorized to
neqotiate payment settlements of outstandinq debts owed to the City
fQr emerqency services rendered when the debtor is unable to satisfy
the outstanding balance due.
Section 4. That Title IX, "General Regulations", Chapter
96, -Fire Safety and Emergency Services", Subheading II Emergency
Medical Services", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended by enactin~ a new
Section 96.68, -Emergency Medical Services and Advanced Life Support
Provider", to read as follows:
Section 96.68 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AND ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT
PROVIDER.
1Al The Fire Department is hereby authorized to obtain and
maintain any and' all necessary State of Florida licensinq. vehicle
permi ts and all necessary Palm Beach County Certificates of Public
Convenience and Necessity (COPCN). pursuant to Chapter 401. Florida
Statutes. and Palm Beach County EMS Ordinance. Palm Beach County Code.
Chapter 13. and any subsequent apnlicable revised laws and ordinances.
for the pu~ose of providinq Advanced Life Support and all manner of
emerqency medical services as it applies to emergency' medical and
trauma treatment and emerqency transportation services. in and for the
City of Delray Beach.
- 4 - Ord. No. 5-95
I
)
1.ll The Fire Department shall. upon obtaining all necessary
licenses and certifications. be desiqnated as the primary provider of
Advanced Life S~pport and of all manner of emergency medical services
as it applies to emergency medical and trauma treatment and emergency
transportation services within the city limits of the City of Delray
Beach.
Section 5. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 6. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 7. That this ordinance shall become effective ten
(10) days after passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the 17th day of Januarv , 1995.
ATTEST: ~~
o Jl".oim'fi/1~'Jv I~ JIo7lf
ity Cle k
First Reading January 3, 1995
Second Reading January 17, 1995
- 5 - Ord. No. 5-95
. . Of
'f/~;
MEMORANDUM
To: David T. H~~Manaqer
From: Joseph M. Sa . ance Director
Date: January 10, 1995
Subject: EMS Cost of Service and Calculation of Base Rates
SCENERIO NO. 1 (4.HAN CREW FOR FIRE SERVICE)
In order to determine the true cost of our EMS services, one has
to extract the full cost of the fire service. The one
assumption that must be made is "what level of fire service do
we want to have?". The answer to this question lies in the
I.C.M.A. Manual for Fire Services, 2nd Edition, page 120 which
establishes fire standards and states that a four-man pumper
would equate to a 65% efficiency rate (3-man equals 38%, 5 - man
equals 100%). Therefore, we will assume each station at four
(4) personnel.
SALARY COSTS
Assuming a four-man crew per shift per station would mean that
all additional resources above this level could be attributed to
EMS. In addition, the EMS Division Chief and the EMS Supervisor
positions (Paramedic Lieutenants) can be fully attributed to
EMS.
Therefore, the personnel costs associated with EMS can be shown
as follows:
. 1- Division Chief EMS- $57,100
. 1- Paramedic Lieutenant (non-shift)- $42,270
. 3- Paramedic Lieutenants (shift)- $142,310
Shift Personnel
. Station 1
1- Firefighter Paramedic $28,383-$40,892 (assume $31,500)
. Station 2
none
. Station 3
1- Firefighter Paramedic $28,383-$40,892 (assume $31,500)
. Station 4
none
. Station 5
Need 1- Firefighter Paramedic $28,383-$40,892 (assume
$31,500)
. Station 6
none- contract
Shift Personnel Cost = $31,500 per shift x 4.35 shift
differential = $137,025
Total EMS Salary Cost = $378,705
Paqe 2
FRINGE BENEFITS
The current budget for Fire Operations shows that fringe
benefits are 39.69% of salaries.
Net Fringe Benefits = $378,705 x 39.69% = '150,308
OPERATING COSTS
By reviewing the budget detail sheets, the following operating
costs can be attributed to EMS:
Medical Director- $22,000
Film for EMS cameras. $1,000
Emergency Medical Dispatcher Training- $60
J.E.M.S. Conference- $775
E.M.S. Expo Conference- $575
Cellular Telephone Expense- $5,390
Vehicle Rental- $65,455
General Liability Insurance- $35,000
Vehicle Maintenance- $7,500
Batteries for Rescue Units (6)- $1,050
Replacement Tires- $6,600
EMS Billing Envelopes and Inserts- $1,000
EMS Run Report Forms- $3,000
EMS Refusal to Transport Forms- $100
Fuel/Lube Vehicles- $5,850
Basic Life Support Supplies- $35,000
Advanced Life Support Supplies- $65,400
Oxygen- $7,200
Batteries- $1,420
Medical Treatment Protective Clothing- $600
Stretcher Covers- $500
EMS Equipment Straps- $500
Uniforms- $283 x 14 = $3,962
Safety Gloves- $3,000
Replacement Uniforms- $550
Backboards- $1,200
Airway Bags. $480
Thermometers- $300
Lateral File Cabinets- $980
EMS Decontamination Respirators- $400
EMS Equipment for ALS Pumper- $7,260
Drug Reference Handbook- $240
Physicians Desk Reference- $80
EMS Memberships- $240
Training/Education- $21,870
Total Operating Costs- '306,537
TOTAL COST FOR EMS SERVICES = '835,550
Paqe 3
The Fire Department has approximately 7,000 EMS calls on an
annual basis with 3,400 of those calls requiring transport.
These calls can be further categorized as 25% BLS (Basic Life
Support) and 75% ALS (Advanced Life Support) . This means
that there are 850 BLS transport calls and 2,550 ALS
transport calls per year.
We are estimating that there will be a 25% uncollectible amount.
If the City wants to breakeven, it therefore must bill $835,550
(EMS cost) plus 25% or $1,114,067 ($835,550/.75) if it
expects to collect a net amount of $835,550. Of this amount,
approximately $51,000 (3 miles per run x 3,400 runs x $5.00)
will be charged in mileage fees and the remainder will be
charged from basic rates.
Basic Rate Determination
Total EMS Cost = $ 835,550
25% Uncollectible Allowance = 278,517
Total Amount to be Billed = $1,114,067
Less: Mileage billed = 51, 000
Net Amount to be Recovered by Rates = $1, 063,067
Total transport runs per year = 3,400
850 BLS runs x 2 men = 1,700 manruns or 18.2% of total runs
2,550 ALS runs x 3 men = 7,650 manruns or 81.8% of total runs
Formula:
1,700x + 7,650x = $1,063,067
9,350x = $1,063,067
x = $113.70
therefore:
2x (BLS 2-man transport crew) = $227.40
3x (ALS 3-man transport crew) = $341.10
Check:
$1,063,067 x 18.2% = $193,478 BLS cost to be billed
$1,063,067 x 81.8% = $869,589 ALS cost to be billed
$193,478 / 850 runs = '227.63 Basic BLS Rate (Ordinance Rate is
presently $20S.00)
$869,589 / 2,550 runs = '341.02 Basic ALS Rate (Ordinance Rate
is presently $27S.00)
Paqe 4
SCBNERIO NO. 2 (5-MAN FIRE CREW FOR FIRE SERVICE)
According to the I.C.M.A. Manual for Fire Services, 2nd Edition,
page 120, a five (5) man crew for fire service would equate
to a 100% efficiency rating. Therefore, for this scenerio,
we will assume a five (5) man crew.
SALARY COSTS
. 1- Division Chief EMS- $57,100
. 1- Paramedic Lieutenant (non-shift)- $42,270
. 3- Paramedic Lieutenants (shift)- $142,310
Shift Personnel
. Station 1
none
. Station 2
none
. Station 3
none
. Station 4
none, will go to 5 personnel upon Highpoint annexation
. Station 5
none, will go to 5 personnel upon Delray Hospital annexation
. Station 6
none- contract
Shift Personnel Cost = $0
Total EMS Salary Cost = '241,680
FRINGE BENEFITS
EMT Certification Pay- $39,000
Paramedic Certification pay- $141,976
Fringe Benefit percentage (less: certification pays) = 34.80%
$241,680 x 34.80% = $84,105
Total EMS Fringe Benefit Cost = '265,081
OPERATING COSTS
By reviewing the budget detail sheets, the following operating
costs can be attributed to EMS:
Medical Director- $22,000
Film for EMS cameras- $1,000
Emergency Medical Dispatcher Training- $60
J.E.M.S. Conference- $775
E.M.S. Expo Conference- $575
Cellular Telephone Expense- $5,390
Vehicle Rental- $65,455
General Liability Insurance- $35,000
Paqe 5
Vehicle Maintenance- $7,500
Batteries for Rescue Units (6)- $1,050
Replacement Tires- $6,600
EMS Billing Envelopes and Inserts- $1,000
EMS Run Report Forms- $3,000
EMS Refusal to Transport Forms- $100
Fuel/Lube Vehicles. $5,850
Basic Life Support Supplies- $35,000
Advanced Life Support Supplies- $65,400
Oxygen- $7,200
Batteries- $1,420
Medical Treatment Protective Clothing- $600
Stretcher Covers- $500
EMS Equipment Straps- $500
Uniforms- $283 x 14 = $3,962
Safety Gloves- $3,000
Replacement uniforms- $550
Backboards- $1,200
Airway Bags- $480
Thermometers. $300
Lateral File Cabinets- $980
EMS Decontamination Respirators- $400
EMS Equipment for ALS Pumper- $7,260
Drug Reference Handbook- $240
Physicians Desk Reference- $80
EMS Memberships- $240
Training/Education- $21,870
Total Operating Costs- '306,537
TOTAL COST FOR EKS SERVICES = '813,298
The Fire Department has approximately 7,000 EMS calls on an
annual basis with 3,400 of those calls requiring transport.
These calls can be further categorized as 25% BLS (Basic Life
Support) and 75% ALS (Advanced Life Support). This means
that there are 850 BLS transport calls and 2,550 ALS
transport calls per year.
We are estimating that there will be a 25% uncollectible amount.
If the City wants to breakeven, it therefore must bill $813,298
(EMS cost) plus 25% or $1,084,397 ($813,298/ . 75) if it
expects to collect a net amount of $813,298. Of this amount,
approximately $51,000 (3 miles per run x 3,400 runs x $5.00)
will be charged in mileage fees and the remainder will be
charged from basic rates.
.
Page 6
Basic Rate Determination
Total EMS Cost = $ 813,298
25% Uncollectible Allowance = 271, 099
Total Amount to be Billed = $1,084,397
Less: Mileage billed = 51,000
Net Amount to be Recovered by Rates = $1,033,397
Total transport runs per year = 3,400
850 BLS runs x 2 men = 1,700 manruns or 18.2% of total runs
2,550 ALS runs x 3 men = 7,650 manruns or 81.8% of total runs
Formula:
1,700x + 7,650x = $1,033,397
9,350x = $1,033,397
x = $110.53
therefore:
2x (BLS 2-man transport crew) = $221.06
3x (ALS 3-man transport crew) = $331.59
Check:
$1,033,397 x 18.2% = $ 188,078 BLS cost to be billed
$1,033,397 x 81.8% = $ 845,319 ALS cost to be billed
$188,078 / 850 runs = $221.27 Basic BLS Rate (Ordinance Rate is
presently $205.00)
$845,319 / 2,550 runs = $331.50 Basic ALS Rate (Ordinance Rate
is presently $275.00)
RATE SUMMARY
BLS ALS
POUR (4) MAN PIRE SERVICE CREWS 227.40 341.10
PIVE (5) MAN PIRE SERVICE CREWS 221.06 331.06
PRESENT ORDINANCE RATES 205.00 275.00
We would appreciate your review of these two scenerios and your
conunents. Please contact us if you require any further analysis
or information.
cc: Robert Rehr, Fire Chief
.
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 10. B. - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 1-95
ALARM SYSTEMS
DATE: JANUARY 131 1995
This is second reading and public hearing for Ordinance No. 1-95
which repeals our existing alarm systems ordinance in its entirety
and enacts a new Chapter 1121 "Alarm Systems", which establishes
updated procedures and fees relative to the regulation of alarm
systems in the city.
This ordinance has been discussed for some time. As now proposed,
it requires alarm systems to deactivate within 15 minutes as
opposed to 30 minutes. Registration of an alarm system will only
be mandated after one false alarml at which time a $10.00 fee will
be charged. However, no registration fee will be required if a
person registers at the time of acquiring an alarm installation
permit or if they register prior to the emission of one false
alarm. The fees imposed for false alarms which are responded to by
the Police Department or the Fire Department are graduated,
beginning at $50.00 for the fourth false alarm, $100.00 for the
fifthl $150.00 for the sixth, and $200.00 each for the seventh and
above 1 during each calendar year.
During discussion at first reading on January 3, 1995, Dr. Alperin
questioned the use of the word lIactivatell in Section 112.04(D) and
suggested it be clarified. Section 112.04(D) has been revised to
readl "Alarm systems which transmit an alarm sound or signal in the
event of a power restoration after a power failure are prohibited. II
The ordinance was passed on first reading by unanimous vote.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 1-95 on second and final
reading.
~ -5--0
(wjfJm€nOmin-r TO aI~t, u.$c. ~.,L ~c:.
ref:agmemo7 WO~ f1delier1t.J~.Jc., II ,~} e&..1Jf'/lj ~ons)
ORDINANCE NO. 1-95
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING TITLE
XI, "BUSINESS REGULATIONS", OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, BY REPEALING CHAPTER 112, "ALARM
SYSTEMS", IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND ENACTING A NEW
CHAPTER 112, "ALARM SYSTEMS", TO PROVIDE FOR
THE REGULATION OF ALARM SYSTEMS WITHIN THE
CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH; PROVIDING A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida,
finds that a high incidence of false alarms and/or malfunctions causes a significant misuse
of the manpower and resources of the Police and Fire Departments by causing the
dispatch of units to the scene of a false alarm or alarm malfunction, thereby rendering units
out of service and unavailable to respond to legitimate emergency situations; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the continued high incidence
of false alarms and/or malfunctions are a threat to the health, safety and welfare of the
citizens of the City of Del ray Beach; and
WHEREAS, reasonable regulation of all alarm systems and their users
should result in a significant decrease in false alarms with a resultant savings in public
resources; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the revision of current
procedures and fees for multiple false alarms and malfunctions would serve the public
health, safety and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAYBEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Title XI, "Business Regulations", Chapter 112, "Alarm
Systems", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, is hereby
repealed in its entirety, and a new Chapter 112, "Alarm Systems", is hereby enacted to
read as follows:
CHAPTER 112: ALARM SYSTEMS
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 112.01 SHORT TITLE.
This chapter shall be known and cited as the "Alarm Systems Ordinance."
Section 112.02 PURPOSE.
This chapter is enacted to provide minimum standards and regulations
applicable to alarm systems, and alarm users. Both society in general and public safety in
particular will be aided by providing a useful and usable system of private security or fire
response which properly balances quick response by the Police and Fire Departments with
minimization of public resources spent on alarms which are false or otherwise not the
intended function of such systems.
Section 112.03 DEFINITIONS.
For the purpose of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply unless
the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning:
"ALARM". The sound or signal of an alarm system.
"ALARM MALFUNCTION". The activation of any alarm which results
in the response of the Police Department or the Fire Department, caused by mechanical
failure, malfunction, improper installation or lack of proper maintenance or any other
response for which Police or Fire Department personnel are unable to gain access to the
premises for any reason, or are unable to determine the apparent cause of the alarm
activation,
"ALARM REGISTRATION". A registration issued by the City
Manager or his designee allowing the operation of an alarm system within the City of
Delray Beach and signifying compliance of the alarm system with the provisions of this
chapter.
"ALARM SYSTEM". Any mechanical, electrical or radio- controlled
device which is designed for the detection of smoke, fire, unauthorized entry or other
activity requiring urgent attention, and which when activated emits a sound or transmits a
signal or message beyond the premises to alert others of an emergency situation,
"ALARM TECHNICIAN". Any person who inspects, installs, repairs or
performs maintenance on alarm systems and is licensed by the State of Florida or works
under a State licensed alarm contractor.
"ALARM USER". Any individual, partnership, corporation or other
entity in control of any building, structure, facility or premises, or portion thereof, where
an alarm system is located and maintained.
"AUTOMATIC TELEPHONE DIALING DEVICE OR DIGITAL
ALARM COMMUNICATOR". An alarm system which automatically transmits a
recorded message or coded signal over regular telephone lines by direct connection or
otherwise, indicating the existence of the emergency situation that the alarm system is
designed to detect.
2
"ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL". As to security/burglar alarm systems,
the Chief of Police or his designated representative; as to fire alarm systems, the Fire Chief
or his designated representative.
"FALSE ALARM". An alarm for which a governmental agency has
made an inspection of the premises within a reasonable time after the activation of an
alarm and finds no apparent reason for the alarm except a possible alarm malfunction, or
an activation falsely indicating that an emergency exists. An alarm is not considered a
false alarm if the alarm is activated by unusually violent conditions of nature or due to
malicious causes beyond the control of the alarm user.
"PREMISES". Any building, structure or facility and adjoining property
which is protected by and upon which is installed an alarm system.
"REOUlRED OPERATIVE ALARM SYSTEM". An alarm system
which the owner of a premises is required to maintain in an operative condition pursuant
to statute, law, ordinance, rule or regulation of any governmental entity,
"SMOKE DETECTOR". A device which detects the visible or invisible
particles of combustion.
Section 112.04 PROHmmONS.
(A) No person, partnership, corporation or other entity shall use or
cause to be used any automatic telephone dialing alarm device or digital alarm
communicator system over any telephone lines exclusively used by the public to directly
request emergency service.
(B) Audible security/burglar alarm systems which do not automatically
deactivate within fifteen (15) minutes after activation are prohibited,
(C) Fire alarm systems which automatically deactivate are prohibited.
(D) Alarm systems which transmit an alarm sound or signal in the event
of a power restoration after a power failure are prohibited,
Section 112.05 EFFECT ON FIRE CODES.
Nothing herein shall be construed as repealing or modifying any provisions
of the applicable fire codes, and to the extent that the provisions of this chapter conflict
with applicable fire codes, those fire codes shall control.
Section 112.06 EXEMPTIONS.
The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to:
3
(A) Alarm systems affixed to motor vehicles, mobile conveyances or
equipment; or
(B) Alarms which are not intended to be heard outside the premises,
REGULATION OF ALARM SYSTEMS
Section 112.20 ALARM REGISTRATION REQUIRED: FEE: TERM OF
REGISTRATION: NONTRANSFERABLE.
(A) (1) Upon the emission of one (1) false alarm, the alarm user
shall be required to obtain a valid alarm registration.
(2) A person required to obtain a valid alarm registration shall
be issued a notice of violation and that person shall have ten (10) days from the date of the
notice of violation to make application for the registration, If application for an alarm
registration is not made within ten (10) days of the notice of violation, the person shall be
in violation of this section and shall result in a late charge of fifty dollars ($50,00) or an
appearance before the Code Enforcement Board,
(B) A registration fee of ten dollars ($10.00) shall be charged to the
alarm user after notification and receipt of notice of violation due to the emission of one
false alarm.
(C) Applicants having more than one alarm system protecting two or
more separate structures shall be required to obtain separate alarm registrations for each
structure, unless the structures are protected by the same alarm system.
(D) Any alarm registration issued pursuant to this chapter shall not be
transferable or assignable. Any change in ownership of residential or commercial property
to which an alarm registration is assigned shall require a new registration application,
(E) Neighborhood subdivisions that have an internal fire and/or burglar
alarm system that is maintained and monitored by a private security company located
within the subdivision shall pay one registration fee for the entire subdivision, The alarm
registration shall be purchased by the subdivision's condominium or homeowner's
association and the application shall be in the name of the association only, All
responsibilities for fees, maintenance and duties as contained in this ordinance shall lie with
the association purchasing the alarm registration.
Section 112.21 APPLICATION FOR ALARM REGISTRATION: REPORTING
CHANGES TO REQUIRED INFORMATION.
(A) (1) Application for an alarm registration shall be made by a
person having control over the property on which the alarm system is to be operated.
Such application shall be made in writing to the Chief Building Official on a form
designated by the city for that purpose. Neighborhood subdivisions referred to in Section
4
112.20(E) shall comply with subsections (B)(2) and (4) and shall provide only one
emergency contact for the purpose of complying with subsection (B)(6),
(2) New alarm systems shall be registered at no cost if the
application is made at the time of the alarm installation permit.
(3) A person having control over a property with an existing
alarm systems may pre-register said system with the City at no cost, prior to the emission
of one (1) false alarm.
(B) On such application, the applicant shall set forth:
(I) The name, address and telephone number of the applicant's
property to be serviced by the alarm, including any business name used for the premises,
(2) The name, address and telephone number of the applicant, if
different from the property to be serviced.
(3) The make and type of the alarm system.
(4) The name, address and telephone number of the alarm
business installing or maintaining the alarm system, if any.
(5) The date of activation of the alarm system.
(6) Emergency Notification. The names, addresses and
telephone numbers of at least two (2) persons or entities who can be contacted at any time
for the following purposes:
(a) To receive notification of alarm activation;
(b) To arrive at the alarm site within thirty (30) minutes
after receiving a request from the Police Department or Fire Department to do so; and
(c) To grant access to or enter the premises and
deactivate the alarm system.
(C) The information set forth in subsection (B) shall be kept current by
the registration holder, and the registration holder shall notify the Police
Department/Communications Center within ten (10) days of any changes in this
information. Failure to so notify shall constitute a violation of this chapter and shall result
in a late charge often dollars ($10.00).
(D) Immediately upon receipt of a registration and prior to the
activation of any alarm system, the Chief Building Official or his designee shall forward a
copy of the application to the Police Department/Communications Center.
S
SECTION 112.22 DUTY OF PERSON NOTllflED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO
PREMISES. RENDER ASSISTANCE.
Any person who is notified by any member of the Police Department or
Fire Department of the activation of an alarm system and who is able to give access to the
alarm site shall come to the alarm site within thirty (30) minutes of the time such person is
notified of such activation and shall provide the Police and/or Fire Department any
necessary access or assistance. Failure to respond as provided shall be grounds for and
result in the city taking reasonable action to deactivate the alarm as provided in Section
112.28 and, if applicable, to suspend or revoke an alarm business authorization as
provided in Section 112.44.
Section 112.23 ISSUANCE OF ALARM REGISTRATION: DECAL REOUIRED.
(A) An alarm registration shall be issued by the Chief Building Official
upon receipt of a completed application,
(B) The Chief Building Official or his designee may inspect the alarm
equipment and planned installation and may require the submission of additional and
specific information.
(C) Each alarm registration holder shall be issued a decal which shall
contain the alarm user's registration number, This decal must be prominently posted at or
near the front entrance of the premises covered by the registration so that the decal is
visible from the outside of the structure.
(0) An application for an alarm registration may be denied if:
(1) The requested information is not supplied on the application
or such additional information as required is not furnished.
(2) Material information on the application is incorrect, or an
applicant falsifies any statement on the application,
(3) If the equipment is found to be inferior and not capable of
proper performance.
Section 112.24 APPEAL OF DENIAL OF REGISTRATION.
Any applicant who is denied an alarm registration may request, in writing, a
hearing before the City Manager or his designee within fifteen (15) calendar days of
receipt of the denial. The City Manager or his designee shall hold a hearing within a
reasonable time of receipt of the written request, After taking into consideration all
relevant facts and circumstances, the City Manager or his designee may either affirm the
denial or order the Chief Building Official to issue the alarm registration in writing, Such
decision shall be mailed to the applicant by regular mail.
6
Section 112.25 FALSE ALARMS PROHIBITED: EXCEPTIONS.
(A) No person shall intentionally activate an alarm system for any
purpose other than an emergency or threat of emergency of the kind for which the alarm
system was designed to give notice.
(B) No alarm system shall be tested or demonstrated without first
notifYing the Police Department or Fire Department and receiving permission from the
appropriate enforcement official.
Penalty, see Section 112.99
Section 112.26 RESPONSE TO ALARM: ALARM USER RESPONSmILITY;
ALARM MALFUNCTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION.
(A) A response to an alarm activation shall result when any officer or
member of the, Police or Fire department shall be dispatched to the premises where the
alann has been activated or learns of the activation of the alarm system(s), by any means
whatsoever, and responds thereto by traveling to that premises,
(B) After responding to an alarm activation, the enforcement official
may notify any person identified in the alarm registration application pursuant to Sec,
112.21 of the activation of the alarm system and such person shall thereupon travel to the
premises to ascertain the status thereof, Should the person notified fail to appear at said
premises within thirty (30) minutes after being notified to do so, the City shall charge the
alarm user a fee of seventy-five dollars ($75.00), The officer or member of the Police
Department or Fire Department who responded to said premises shall serve the alarm user
or authorized representative with an "Alarm Activation Report".
(C) In the event of an alarm activation deemed by the enforcement
official to be a false alarm as the result of an alarm malfunction, the alarm user or
authorized representative will be served an "Alarm Activation Report" indicating that the
activation was deemed to be the result of a malfunction, and requiring the alarm user or
authorized representative to return a completed "Affidavit of ServicelRepair" within thirty
(30) days of said alarm activation which can verify to the satisfaction of the enforcement
official that the alarm system in question has actually been examined by an alarm
technician and that a bona fide attempt has been made to identify and correct any defect of
design, installation or operation of the alarm system which was identifiable as the cause of
the alarm malfunction. Failure to return an "Affidavit of ServicelRepair" within said thirty
day period which is satisfactory to the enforcement official will result in a disconnection
per Section 112,28 or enforcement action in the event of a required Fire Alarm System per
F.S. 633.025(3).
Section 112.27 MULTIPLE ALARM MALFUNCTIONS OR FALSE ALARMS
DECLARED A PUBLIC NUISANCE: FEE CHARGES.
7
(A) It is hereby found and determined that the emission of more than
three (3) false alarms within a calendar year period at the same premises is excessive and
constitutes a public nuisance.
(B) No fee shall be assessed for the first three (3) false alarms at the
same premises responded to by the Police Department or the Fire Department during each
calendar year. Thereafter, the following fees shall be paid by the alarm user for each false
alarm responded to by the Police Department or the Fire Department at the same premises
during each calendar year.
Number of False Alarms or Alarm Malfunctions Fees
Fourth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 50.00
Fifth .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . 100,00
Sixth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . , , , . , . , , . . . . .. 150,00
Seventh and above. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . , , , . . , . . .. . . ., 200,00 each
(C) Once a false alarm or alarm malfunction has been responded to by
the Police Department or the Fire Department, it shall be unlawful for the alarm panel to
be reset by the alarm user or authorized representative, until the authorization of the
enforcement official has been obtained.
(0) Should any fee assessed pursuant to this chapter remain unpaid in
excess of 120 days from the date the charge is billed, a collection fee in the amount of
eight percent (8%) of the outstanding balance shall be assessed and shall be payable by the
alarm user in addition to the original fee. The alarm user shall also be responsible for any
legal fees or costs incurred by the City ofDelray Beach in enforcement of this chapter,
Section 112.28 DISCONNECTION OF ALARM SYSTEM.
(A) Except for premises protected by a required operative alarm
system, either of the Police Department or Fire Department enforcement officials are
authorized to order the disconnecting of any alarm system, by written notice to the alarm
user at the premises wherein an alarm system is installed, for any of the following reasons:
(1) Failure to meet all requirements provided for in this chapter
within thirty (30) days of the charging of the fee; or
(2) Failure of the alarm user to provide a written "Affidavit of
Service/Repair" required by this chapter; or
(3) A false alarm or alarm malfunction at a premises for which a
fee is charged pursuant to this chapter is the result of the failure of the alarm user to take
corrective action to eliminate the cause of the false alarm; or
8
(4) The failure of a person notified pursuant to this chapter to
appear within thirty (30) minutes after being notified to respond, if such failure to timely
appear occurs four or more times within a registration period.
(B) The written notice to disconnect shall be mailed to the alarm user,
by certified mail, and shall specify the date on which the alarm user shall be required to
disconnect the alarm system, which date shall be at least fifteen (15) days following the
date of mailing of the notice. The alarm user may appeal the order of the enforcement
official pursuant to Section 112.29.
Section 112.29 APPEAL.
An alarm user to whom a notice to disconnect an alarm system was mailed,
pursuant to Section 112.28, shall be entitled to appeal the order of the enforcement official
to the City Manager or his designee. An appeal must be in writing, stating the reasons
why the order to disconnect should be withdrawn, and shall be made within fifteen (15)
days of the date of receipt of the notice to disconnect, The City Manager or his designee
shall review the facts and circumstances and shall determine whether the alarm user has
shown good cause why the order should be withdrawn, The City Manager or his designee
shall notify the alarm user of the decision in writing, If the City Manager or his designee
affinns the order to disconnect an alarm system, the alarm user shall have five (5) days
following mailing of the written decision of the City Manager or his designee within which
to comply with the order. The appeal of an order to disconnect shall suspend the effective
date of the order until the appeal has been acted upon by the City Manager or his
designee.
Section 112.30 FAILURE TO DISCONNECT OR UNAUTHORIZED
RECONNECTION OF ALARM SYSTEM.
It shall be unlawful for any person to fail to disconnect an alarm system
which has been ordered disconnected pursuant to Section 112.28, including those
situations in which the City Manager or his designee affirmed the order to disconnect; and
it shall be unlawful for any person to reconnect an alarm system which has been
disconnected pursuant to the order of the enforcement official, unless reconnection of the
alarm system is authorized pursuant to Section 112.31. Any person violating the
provisions of this section shall be subject to penalties provided for in Section 10.99, the
penalty being cumulative to other administrative remedies provided for in this chapter,
Section 112.31 RECONNECTION OF ALARM SYSTEMS.
Any order to disconnect an alarm system may be rescinded by either the
Police Department or Fire Department enforcement official upon a finding by said
enforcement official that the alarm user has taken corrective action which it is reasonable
to conclude will remedy the cause of the false alarms or alarm malfunctions at the
9
premises. In making a request for such a rescission, the alarm user shall have the burden
to show what corrective action has been taken and that same is sufficient to support a
finding that the cause of the false alarms or alarm malfunctions has been remedied, The
enforcement official shall have the right to inspect the alarm system and test same prior to
rescinding the order to disconnect. Before any reconnection of an alarm system, after the
order to disconnect said system, a reconnection fee of fifty dollars ($50,00) shall be
assessed. The enforcement official shall not rescind an order to disconnect if the alarm
user has failed to pay any fee charged pursuant to this chapter,
Section 112.32 NEWLY INSTALLED ALARM SYSTEMS.
The provisions of this chapter relative to false alarms shall not apply to any
newly installed alarm system for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of the activation
of that alarm system, but shall apply from and after the expiration of the initial sixty (60)
day period following activation. The time limit provided for in this section shall be
measured from the date shown on the application for alarm registration required by
Section 112.21(B)(5). The exemptions set forth in this section shall not apply' to any
person who has failed to comply with Section 112.20.
ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT
Section 112.50 NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROVISIONS.
In addition to the violations specifically set forth herein, any noncompliance
with the provisions of this chapter shall be decreed a violation of this chapter, punishable
as provided herein.
Section 112.51 ENFORCEMENT THROUGH CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD.
The enforcement official may initiate action before the Code Enforcement
Board of the city to obtain compliance with this chapter and payment of service charges or
fees assessed by the city pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. The Code
Enforcement Board shall have the authority to place a lien against the premises served by
an alarm system in the amount of all assessed service charges and fees.
Section 112.52 ALARM SYSTEM OPERATIONS.
The City, its officers, employees and agents, shall not assume any duty or
responsibility for the installation, maintenance, operation, repair or effectiveness of any
privately owned alarm system, those duties or responsibilities being solely those of the
alarm user. Additionally, it shall be the responsibility of the alarm user to silence an
activated alarm and thereafter reset same.
Section 112.53 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.
10
The City, its officers and agents shall not be under any obligation or duty to
an alarm user or to any other person hereunder by reason of this ordinance. The City
specifically disclaims liability for any damages which may be caused by failure to respond
to an alarm. Nothing herein shall be deemed to waive any immunities granted pursuant to
Section 768.28, Florida Statutes.
Section 112.54 REMEDIES TO BE CUMULATIVE.
The remedies of the city provided in this chapter shall be cumulative with
each other and other remedies existing according to law.
Section 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith
be, and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 3, That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any
portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof
as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading
on this the 17th day of January . 1995,
~~
ATTEST:
Q/;. Nm'ffJ1-!,:fljJ if! J/nmy
City CI k
First Reading January 3, 1995
Second Reading January 17, 1995
.-.-:z
11
WEINER & MORICI, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
The Clari< House
102 North Swinton Avenue
Oelray Beach, Florida 33444
MICHAEL S. WEINER South Palm Beach County: (407) 265-2666
ALFRED Q. MORICI North Palm Beach County: (407) 736-5888
CAROLE ARONSON Broward County: (305) 462-4935
Telecopier: (407) 272-6831
OF COUNSEL:
PETER J. MURRAY
VIA BUD DELIVERY
January 17, 1995
Susan Ruby, Esquire'
The City of Delray Beach
200 N.W. 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
RE: Del Raton Park; Rezoning from PC (Plan Commercial) to RM
(Medium Density Residential) former Lehman Property
Our File No.: CGLI(070)001
Dear Susan:
This is to formally request a postponement of the above-captioned
application with respect to the second reading at the meeting
tonight, January 17, 1995. In the event that any re-advertising,
re-notice or republication costs were required, the costs would be
born by the Applicant. The postponement would be for a date not
later than April 30, 1995.
The purpose of the postponement, among other things, is to clarify
certain site plan issues with the Site Plan Review and Appearance
Board on a concept basis. As we know, no formal action can be
taken.
We appreciate your cooperation in this matter and believe that the
work which the Applicant is doing with the Site Plan Review and
Appear nce Board wil improve the project being considered.
cc: Jose h Torg ~rn @[gO\Yl rn: ~~.
Diane Dominguez ~
a1T-
,\ ~
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER~l
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i 10. (!.- MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO.
~
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
This is second reading and public hearing Ordinance No. 4-95
which rezones a 10.23 acre parcel of land from PC (Planned
Commercial) District to RM (Medium Density Residential) District.
The property is located on the south side of Lindell Boulevard,
between South Dixie Highway and South Federal Highway.
The purpose of this rezoning is to apply the appropriate zoning
classification for a potential multiple family development. The
property is located in Redevelopment Area #6 per the Future Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed multi-family
use differs from the uses contemplated for this redevelopment
area. Therefore, if the Commission determines the proposed
rezoning to be appropriate, an associated action should be formal
direction to initiate a Comprehensive Plan amendment regarding
Redevelopment Area #6, to be processed as part of Comprehensive
Plan Amendment 95-1. Please refer to the staff documentation for
a detailed analysis of this request.
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at
public hearing on December 19, 1994. The applicant's
representative asked that the Board recommend affixing a density
suffix of 111211 to the RM zoning. The Board felt that the exact
density would more appropriately determined during the site plan
review process, and voted 5 to o to recommend that the rezoning
to RM be approved. The Board further recommended that the
Commission initiate an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for
Redevelopment Area #6.
At first reading on January 3, 1995, the Commission passed the
ordinance by unanimous vote.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 4-95 on second and final
reading. If passed, formal initiation of an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan for Redevelopment Area #6 is also requested.
ref:agmemo12 p~
, \
.
)
ORDINANCE NO. 4-95
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REZONING AND PLACING LAND
PRESENTLY ZONED PC (PLANNED COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT IN
THE RM (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; SAID
LAND BEING GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
LINDELL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND
SOUTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY; AND AMENDING · ZONING MAP OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, 1994"; PROVIDING A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the property hereinafter described is shown on the
Zoning District Map of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, dated April,
1994, as being zoned PC (Planned Commercial) District; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of December 19, 1994, the Planning
and Zoning Board for the City of Delray Beach, as Local Planning
Agency, reviewed this item and voted 5 to 0 to recommend approval of
the rezoning, based upon positive findings; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate that the Zoning District Map of
the City of Delray Beach, Florida, dated April, 1994, be amended to
reflect the revised zoning classification.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Zoning District Map of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, dated April, 1994, be, and the same is hereby
amended to reflect a zoning classification of RM (Medium Density
Residential) District for the following described property:
A portion of the Southeast One-Quarter (SE 1/4) of
Section 29 and a portion of the Northeast One-Quarter
(NE 1/4) of Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 43
East, Palm Beach County, Florida; a portion of
DEL-RATON PARK, according to the Plat thereof, as
recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 9 and 10, of the
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; as
modified by City of Delray Beach Resolution No.
68-86, dated December 16, 1986, as recorded in
Official Record Book 5140, Page 1278, of the Public
Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; and a portion
of TROPIC PALMS PLAT NO. 1, according to the Plat
thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 25, Pages 99-102,
of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida;
as modified by City of Delray Beach Resolution No.
68-86, dated December 16, 1986, recorded in Official
Record Book 5140, Page 1278, of the Public Records of
I
Palm Beach County, Florida, being more particularly
described as follows:
COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Northeast
One-Quarter (NE 1/4) of said Section 32; thence South
89 degrees 44' 35" West along the North line thereof,
a distance of 495.46 feet to a Point of Intersection
wi th the Westerly right-of-way line of U. S. Highway
No. 1 as shown on said "TROPIC PALMS PLAT NO. 111 and
the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 07 degrees 44'
I 00" West, a distance of 302.94 feet; thence South 89
degrees 44' 35" West, along a line parallel with and
I 300.00 feet South of the North line of said Section
I 32, a distance of 128.79 feet to a Point of
I Intersection with the Easterly line of Lots 9 through
26, Block 32 of said DEL-RATON PARK; thence South 00
degrees 28' 25" East, along said East line, a
distance of 162.34 feet to the Southeast corner of
Lot 9, Block 32 of said DEL-RATON PARK; thence South
I 89 degrees 31' 35" West, along the South line
i thereof, a distance of 155.00 feet to a Point of
i Intersection with the centerline of "Raton Court" as
II shown on said DEL-RATON PARK; thence South 00 degrees
I 28' 2511 East, along said centerline, a dis'tance of
: 199.88 feet to a Point of Intersection with the
I Easterly projection of the South line of Lot 24,
! Block 6 of said DEL-RATON PARK; thence South 89
! degrees 44' 35M West, along said projection, a
I distance of 65.85 feet to a Point of Intersectiort
I with the North right-of-way line of South Florida
Water Management District CanaliS; thence North 79
degrees 45' 25" West, along said North right-of-way
line, a distance of 105.80 feet; thence North 03
degrees 36' 3811 East, continuing along said North
right-of-way line, a distance of 5.02 feet; thence
North 79 degrees 45' 25M West, continuing along said
North right-of-way line, a distance of 169.78 feet to
a Point of Intersection with the centerline of Dixie
Boulevard; thence North 04 degrees 53' 4211 East, a
distance of 369.86 feet; thence North 07 degrees 45'
I OS" East, along the centerline of said "Dixie
Boulevard", a distance of 224.37 feet to a Point of
Intersection with the Easterly projection of the
South line of Lot 30, Block 4 of said DEL-RATON PARK;
thence North 82 degrees 14' 55" West, along said
line, a distance of 155.00 feet to the East
right-of-way line of IIOld Dixie Highway" as shown on I
said TROPIC PALMS PLAT NO.1; thence North 07 degrees
45' 05" East, along said East right-of-way line, a
I
I - 2 - Ord. No. 4-95
I
, ,
)
distance of 224.60 feet to a Point of Intersection
with the South right-of-way line of tlLindel1
Boulevardtl as shown on said TROPIC PALMS PLAT NO. 1 ;
thence South 82 degrees 14' 55" East, along a line
I parallel with and 50.00 feet South of the centerline
I of said "Lindell Boulevard N , a distance of 731.96
feet to a Point of Intersection with the North line
I of Block 32 of said DEL-RATON PARK; thence North 89
, degrees 44' 35t1 East, along said North line, a
distance of 11. 45 feet to a Point of Intersection
I with said West right-of-way line of u.S. Highway No.
1; thence South 07 degrees 44' 00" West, along said
West right-of-way line, a distance of 126.23 feet to
the POINT OF BEGINNING.
I
i The subject property is located on the south side of
I Lindell Boulevard, between South Dixie Highway and
I
! South Federal Highway; containing 10.23 acres, more
i
I or less.
I Section 2. That the Planning Director of said City shall,
I
I
i upon the effective date of this ordinance, amend the Zoning Map of the
I City of Delray Beach, Florida, to conform with the provisions of
I Section 1 hereof.
I Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
I
I conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed.
I
i Seotion 4. That should any section or provision of this
I
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not af~ect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Seotion 5. That this ordinance shall become effective
I immediately upon passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the day of , 1995.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
First Reading
Second Reading
- 3 - Ord. No. 4-95
I
I i
,
~" _.:"...,,,., ~~", .,..;~. ~'-:"'~~-fji:.~';'-:i:;~~-,~:.i. --~- _:::i:..~ ~~~Cf,.~ ~-=--=-~i:~. '-' -=;. -do'- ';,-,+" -; _.'" ,~- '":'~." ,"'.','; ~ ~'. ,';;. .~ ' ':;~~...i.'_ - ."--., ',....'
~'~l,~~,"~t-:.(- .
., ." ,,- '\ \,.. -... .. .... .~ '. . - .
, .
~: ',' I.....~~r:., :: H ~,.:.~ ._. '-' _.., . _ _ . ':".. ,... . _, ._,_::~-:-::;',.::". ~ .~ -f"'-~,. ".:
11R~_~':] 0---~~':-~'._~- ..... .~
~ ,or: . <:', _~_::'':''H_- .~ .'" 1 1kii ~ :;::
----.~. . DEUtAY ., ~i
r -CD--'-t---AC -= 110-1
. - LA ~ J
~ - r ~r _
.., "T AVE.
......)- MORSE ~ =-
~ f-- ~ SA1UM r=
il( - ::--.... ~ 1:=
- _. :::;'1
~ r- 1- JGC . ~ ~
~- ~ --
~_..: ,$AlUM . ~
- . ~-
~ r- ~ ~ 1 _
L/~- ~ ~
~ ---
7JJ~ I - .. I ':::
~ - WOOD
U ~ -:... AC -
JJl -- _ ~
m -- >- - PC RM ~ )
r ~-~ _
- , '--- ~ HOUIES
r--. - j '-
J j j J~ ,.::::; ~- f-
n-n~~ l-.J 5~
- I I T J . . """'" ....... .~~ I ....... L ::=
- i ,. UIlIIII"II"mr~OI[lI III
~ __a 1 ~ j j?
~ ~ ~
~ ~ , ..... .....IC 1:11.[ DO.
~ ~ ~ ~~
1 ~ ~' 1= C ,.-JN~
a I I . I.)~
0<<<6.. L~~ ").'E--"=.Y_.'(
.,p. ..""' ~ 0... ....... lll~V~ ~
J ............... / '/
~ REZONING
...... ~
cn'f . 18M' .ucM. '"
- ... ... IJNI Sm&I
oK
~1
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
THRU: N D ~~~TOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLA G AND ZONING
FROM: JEFFREY A. COSTELLO ~
SENIOR PLANNER
SUBJECT: MEETING OF JANUARY 3, 1995
REZONING FROM PC (PLANNED COMMERCIAL) TO RM (MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF LINDELL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN SOUTH FEDERAL
HIGHWAY AND SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY.
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
approval on first reading of an ordinance rezoning a 10.2
acre parcel from PC (Planned Commercial) to RM (Medium
Density Residential).
The subject property is located on the south side of
Lindell Boulevard, between South Federal Highway and South
Dixie Highway.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property was formerly approved for use as an auto
dealership (Lehman Auto) , which was never established. The
purpose of this rezoning is to apply the appropriate
classification for a potential multiple family development. The
rezoning does not include the existing commercial properties
along Federal and Dixie Highways.
The request involves property that is within Redevelopment Area
#6, as designated in the Future Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan. The proposed change to a multi-family
development differs from the uses included in the description of
this Redevelopment Area. If approved, a Comprehensive Plan
amendment dealing with Redevelopment Area #6 should be
initiated.
Additional background and a full analysis of the request is
provided in the attached Planning and Zoning Board staff report.
City Commission Documentation
Meeting of January 3, 1995
Rezoning from PC to RM for property at Lindell and Federal
Page 2
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
At its meeting of December 19, 1994, the Planning and Zoning
Board held a public hearing in conjunction with the rezoning
request. The vice-president of the Tropic Palms Homeowners
Association stated his concern that the proposed density was too
great, and that rental apartments would detract from the
neighborhood.
Michael Weiner, the applicant's representative, asked that the
Board affix a density suffix of "12" to the RM classification.
While the Board was not opposed to a potential density of 12
units per acre, their consensus was not to apply a suffix. They
felt that the exact density would be more appropriately
determined at the site plan stage.
The Board voted 5-0 (Kiselewski and Wheat absent) to recommend
that the rezoning to RM be approved. The Board also recommended
unanimously that the Commission initiate an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan regarding Redevelopment Area #6, to be
processed with Plan Amendment 95-1.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approve the rezoning on first reading, setting a
public hearing date for January 17, 1995, and direct staff
to process a Comprehensive Plan amendment for Redevelopment
Area #6.
,
Attachment:
* P&Z Board Staff Report & Documentation of December 19, 1994
* Copy of Ordinance (by others)
-rICCLINDEL.DOC
I PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH --- STAFF REPORT ---
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1994
AGENDA ITEM: V.A.
ITEM: Rezoning from PC (Planned Commercial) to ~I (Medium Density Residential)
(Former Lehman Property).
GENERAL DATA:
Owner....................Southeast Investments of
Palm Beach county, Inc.
Applicant................CG Land, Inc. ~
ClWC 1llUCIICS
Agent....................Joseph S. Torg
Joseph S. Torg and Co.,
Inc.
Location.................Sout.hside of Linden
Boulevard, between Federal DIlJUoT
Highway and Dixie Highway. ftnOTA
Property Size............lO.23 Acres
City Land Use Plan.......Redevelopment Area '6 ..~
SA1IJlIC
Existing City Zoning.....PC (Planned Commercial)
Proposed City Zoning.....RM (Medium Density
Residential)
Adjacent Zoning...North: PC
East: PC, AC (Automotive
Commercial), and GC
(General Commercial)
South: City of Boca Raton - B-4
(General Business District)
and RBI (General Business
, and Motel District)
West: PC and RM
, : .,. ~:.
Existing Land usi"~'''' Vacant land.
Proposed Land UBerT:. u.. ,Potentially a 122-unit
multiple family development.
Water Service............Available adjacent to the
property via an existing
10" water main along both
Lindell Boulevard and Dixie
Highway.
Sewer service............To be provided via a main
extension south on Federal
Highway along with the
installation of a lift station.
V.A.
f
I T E M B E FOR E THE BOARD:
The item before the Board is that of making a
recommendation to the City Commission on a Rezoning
request from PC (Planned Commercial) to RM (Medium
Density Residential), pursuant to Section 2.4.5(E).
The subject property is located on the south side of
Lindell Boulevard, between South Federal Highway and
South Dixie Highway.
Pursuant to Section 2.2.2(E), the Local Planning
Agency (P & Z Board) shall review and make a
recommendation to the City Commission with respect to
rezoning of any property within the City.
B A C K G R 0 U N D :
The subject property is comprised of a portion of the Del-Raton
Park subdivision and a portion of Tropic Palms Plat No. 1 which
is currently vacant and has been for many years. The following
are land use actions that have occurred on the property.
On December 16, 1986, the City Commission approved the
annexation of a portion of the subject property as well as
adjacent properties (south of Lindell Boulevard, between Federal
Highway and Dixie Highway) (13.3 acres) into the City of Delray
Beach with an SC (Specialized Commercial) zone designation (via
Ordinance No. 89-86). Also at that meeting, the CommisSion
approved the abandonment of various road and canal
rights-of-way, and easements within and adjacent to the annexed
. property (via Resolution No. 68-86).
At its meeting of March 24, 1987, the City Commission approved a
land use plan amendment from MF-10 (Multiple Family - 10 du/ac
to C (Commercial) (via Ordinance No. 24-87) and a rezoning from
RM-10 (Multiple Family Dwelling District) to SC (Specialized
Commercial) for 2.3 acres of land on the south side of Lindell
Boulevard (via Ordinance No. 25-87). Also at that meeting, the
City Co~ission granted conditional use and site plan approval
to construct a full service automobile dealership (Lehman Auto
Dealership) on 10.2 acres of land south of Lindell, between
Federal and Dixie Highways. A condition of approval was that
the property be platted.
On November 11, 1987, the City Commission approved the plat,
however, the plat was never recorded. On July 29, 1988, a
request for a time extension to the conditional use and site
plan for Lehman auto dealership was submitted and was
subsequently withdrawn. Thus, the conditional use and site plan
expired on April 20, 1988.
.
P & Z Board Staff Report
. Rezoning from PC to RM at Lindell Blvd. and Federal Hwy.
Page 2
With the adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan in November
1989, ~he property's land use map designation was changed from C
(Commercial) to Redevelopment Area '6. With the Citywide
rezoning and adoption of the Land Development Regulations in
October 1990, the subject property was rezoned from SC
(Specialized Commercial) to PC (Planned Commercial). On May 6,
1994 an application for rezoning from PC (Planned Commercial) to
RM (Medium Density Residential) was submitted and subsequently
withdrawn prior to any action. On November 11, 1994, the .-
rezoning request from PC to RM was submitted and is now before
the Board for action.
PRO J E C T DES C RIP T ION :
The proposal is to rezone 10.2 acres of land from PC (Planned
Commercial) to RM (Medium Density Residential). The rezoning
does not include the existing commercial properties along
Federal and Dixie Highways. If the Rezoning is approved, a site
and development plan submittal to construct a multiple-family
development is anticipated.
Z 0 N I N G A N A L Y S IS:
Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the
approval of development applications, certain findings must be
made in a form which is part of the official record. This may
be achieved through information on the application, the Staff
Report, or Minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which
has the authority to approve or deny the development
application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map,
Compatibility, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and
Compliance with the Land Development Regulations (LORs).
. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES:
A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted
Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable
objectives are noted.
Land US8 Element Redevelopment Areas - The Redevelopment Area
designation is applied to those areas which have been identified
in the Land Use Element as being in need of redevelopment.
Development shall occur pursuant to a specific "redevelopment
plan" which is to be prepared pursuant to Objective C-2 of the
Land Use Element. If a development proposal is presented to the
City prior to the creation and adoption of a redevelopment plan,
that proposal shall be handled in one of the following ways:
. the application shall be placed on hold for not more than
six (6) months while the redevelopment plan is prepared;
. the application shall be processed on a case by case basis
with the existing zoning map, the Land Use Element, and the
Housing element providing the Local Planning Agency with
the policy guidance needed to properly dispose of the
application.
P , Z Board Staff Report
Rezoning from PC to RM at Lindell Blvd. and Federal Hwy.
Page 3
The description of the Lindell Boulevard Redevelopment Area ('6)
in the Comprehensive Plan is as follows:
Land Use Element Policy C-2.6 - The Lindell Boulevard and
Federal Highway Redevelopment Area (Redevelopment Area '6)
extends from the C-15 Canal northward between Federal and Dixie
Highways. Half of the land is vacant, almost half is
underutilized as a substandard trailer park, and a few lots have
residences upon them. An effort shall be made to promote
aggregation of parcels prior to any further development. While
any commercial use is allowable, the future use of the property
is most appropriate for a "destination" use i.e. a use to which
a person will travel. These uses include, highly specialized
commercial activities and recreation. The incentives provided
under the Large Scale Mixed Use designation could be applied to
this redevelopment area. The area does not include the existing
(Honda) automobile dealership but does include the mobile home
park north of it.
The proposal does involve the aggregation of land as the
subject property is comprised of a large number of
individual lots as well as abandoned rights-of-way and
easements. The applicant is in the process of contacting
adjacent property owners in an attempt to purchase
additional land to incorporate into the subject property.
Previous attempts were made by the applicant, however, the
adjacent property owners were not receptive to the
applicant's request.
Given the property's location, the development of the
property as multi-family may be more realistic than a
destination use (specialized commercial use) . Also, the
development of the property as commercial (retail) may not
be realized given the high vacancy rate of adjacent
commercial properties and shopping centers. Additionally,
traffic concurrency problems on South Federal Highway
reduce the likelihood that a destination type commercial
operation could be readily approved at this location.
.Thus , while the proposal is not entirely consistent with
the~existing description in the Comprehensive Plan, it may
be ~more appropriate to delete or amend that description
than to deny the proposal based on that inconsistency. At
the very least, the rezoning should be considered on its
own merits, as permitted in the "case by case" option under
the policies for Redevelopment Areas in the Comprehensive
Plan.
Land Use Element Objective A-l - Vacant property shall be
developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity is
appropriate and complies in terms of soil, topographic, and
other applicable physical considerations, is complimentary to
adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs.
P & Z Board Staff Report
. Rezoning from PC to RM at Lindell Blvd. and Federal Hwy.
Page 4
A. Physical Considerations - The property was previously
disturbed in order to accommodate an automobile
dealership, which was never constructed. There are no
special physical or environmental characteristics of
the land that would be negatively impacted by the
proposed residences.
B. Complimentary with Ad1acent Land Uses - The rezoning
from commercial to residential will be complimentary ,-
with the residential communities to the west of Dixie
Highway and east of Federal Highway as well as the
adjacent commercial uses.
C. Fulfills Remaininq Land Use Needs - The Housing
Element of the Comprehensive Plan calls for
development of property to provide a variety of
housing types. Further, within Redevelopment Areas
medium density residential concentrations shall be
provided. Along the Federal Highway Corridor, there
is an abundance of vacant and underutilized commercial
properties. This rezoning will result in the
reduction of commercial zoned property from a
commercially saturated area and yet fulfill the need
for medium density residential within redevelopment
areas.
Conservation POlicy B-2.5 - Whenever new development or
redevelopment is proposed along a waterway, a canal, an
environmentally sensitive area, or an area identified via policy
B-2.1, an area equivalent to at least 10% of the total area of
the development shall be set aside in an undisturbed state or
25% of native communities shall be retained pursuant to Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Commission Policy 10.2.2.2.
This policy is applicable as the property abuts the SFWMD
C-15 Canal. However, the site is in a disturbed state and
there are no native communities that abut the canal. This
policy will be further addressed with review of a site and
development plan proposal. The RM regulations require this
.development to provide a minimum 25% open space.
~
Traffic Blement Table T-4 - The ultimate right-of-way width for
Dixie Highway between Linton Boulevard and the South City Limits
is 80'.
Presently, there exists 30' of right-of-way adjacent to
this property, therefore a 50' right-of-way dedication is
required along Dixie Highway. If the rezoning is approved,
submittal of a site plan application is anticipated. The
right-of-way dedication will be addressed at that time.
Future Land Use Map: Pursuant to Land Development Regulations
Section 3.1.1(A) (future Land Use Map) , all land uses and
resulting structures must be allowed in the zoning district
within which the land is situated and, said zoning must be
consistent with the land use designation as shown on the Future
Land Use Map.
P , Z Board Staff Report
Rezoning from PC to RM at Lindell Blvd. and Federal Hwy. ,
Page 5
The subject property has a Redevelopment Area 16 Land Use Map
designation and is currently zoned PC. Unlike other land use
designations, there are no zoning classifications that are
automatically consistent with a Redevelopment Area designation.
The proposal to aggregate land into one development is
consistent with the current description of Redevelopment Area
16. The RM zoning does not conform to the description of this
area, however as previously discussed, the option exists to
consider the proposal on a "case by case" basis.
This rezoning involves a majority of the property bhat lies
within Redevelopment Area 16. If the rezoning is approved, the
redevelopment designation should be removed and replaced with a
specific underlying land use designation. Removal of the
current land use designation will require an amendment to the
Future Land Use Map. As the designation covers an area that
exceeds 10 acres, the amendment would exceed the 10 acre maximum
permitted for Small Scale Amendments. Thus, that amendment will
have to await the twice a year Comprehensive Plan Amendment
cycle.
In addition to the above, the ability to aggregate the existing
commercial properties adjacent to the subject property, into an
overall Planned Commercial development will have been
diminished. As such, their current PC zoning will become
inappropriate. Rezoning of these properties should occur
concurrently with the amendment to, or deletion of, the
description of Redevelopment Area '6 in the Comprehensive Plan.
Concurrency:
Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B), Concurrency as defined pursuant to
Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan
must be met and a determination made that the public facility
needs of the requested land use and/or development application
will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or
to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the
following areas:
Water 'Sewer:
,~..
The rezOning from commercial to residential will result in an
increase ,. in water and sewage flows. The projected water and
sewer flows under the current PC development scenario are 14,330
gallons per day whereas the flows for a maximum potential
122-unit multi-family development under the RM zoning would be
26,718 gallons per day. Development of these properties under
either scenario will not cause an adverse impact on water and
sewer level of service standards.
Water service is available adjacent to the property via an
existing 10" water main along both Lindell Boulevard and Dixie
Highway. Sewer service is to be provided via a main extension
south on Federal Highway along with the installation of a lift
station. With future development any main extensions and/or
upgrades will be the responsibility of the developer.
/ P & Z Board Staff Report
Rezoning from PC to RM at Lindell Blvd. and Federal Hwy.
Page 6
Drainaqe:
The change from commercial to residential will result in less
impervious areas (building and pavement coverage) . As the
property is currently vacant, there are no problems anticipated
with the ability of future development retaining drainage
on-site and complying with South Florida Water Management
District Standards.
Streets and Traffic:
The potential 122-unit multiple family development will generate
854 trips, whereas the potential traffic generated by a shopping
center is 5,451 trips. Thus, the traffic generated by the
potential residential development will be significantly less
than that generated by a commercial development. Based upon the
above, positive findings with respect to traffic concur~ency can
be made for the rezoning.
It is noted that the major roadways adjacent to the subject
property are Federal Highway, a State Principal arterial, and
Dixie Highway, a County Collector. Although this segment of
Dixie Highway roadway link (between Linton Boulevard and the
C-15 Canal) is currently operating at an acceptable level of
service (Level Of Service "B"), the Federal Highway roadway link
is currently operating at a substandard level of service (Level
Of Service "E"). With a site and development plan submittal, a
full traffic study must be submitted which addresses the
capacity of the above roadway links.
Parks and Recreation:
The proposed RM zoning will allow a maximum of 122 units. The
proposed units will not have a significant impact with respect
to level of service standards for parks and recreation
facilities. A parks and recreation impact fee of $500 per unit
will be assessed at the time of building permit.
Solid Waste:
\....
~
The rez<#llng will result in a substantial reduction of trash
generat~. The existing PC zoning could generate 3,121 pounds
per day whereas a multi-family development under the proposed RM
zoning would would generate 535 pounds per day. Thus, positive
impacts on this level of service standard will be realized.
Section 3.3.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions): The applicable
. performance standards of Section 3.3.2 and other policies which
apply are as follows:
D) That the rezoning shall result in allowing land uses which
are deemed compatible with adjacent and nearby land uses
both existing ~nd proposed; or that if an incompatibility
may occur, that sufficient regulations exist to property
mitigate adverse impacts from the new use.
P & Z Board Staff Report
Rezoning from PC to RM at Lindell Blvd. and Federal Hwy. .
page 7
North of the subject property is zoned PC (Planned
Commercial); west is zoned PC and RM (Medium Density
Residential); east is PC, GC (General Commercial) and AC
(Automotive Commercial); and south across the C-15 Canal is
zoned City of Boca Raton RBI (General Business and Motel)
and B-4 (General Business).
The existing land uses to the north are: an auto repair
shop (Certified Auto Repair Service), four (4) single
family homes, and vacant land. South, across the C-15
Canal, is vacant land and a City of Boca Raton water
storage tank. East is Delray Isuzu auto dealership,
Pelican Harbor Shoppes, Delray Dental Building, Orange
Royal ( farmers market). West is Mac t s Garden of Eden
(nursery), Dixie Variety Store (convenience store), a
vacant commercial building, vacant land and, across. Dixie
Highway and the F.E.C. Railroad, The pointe townhouse
development.
The proposed RM zoning will allow a development which is
much less intense than that allowed under the current PC
(Planned Commercial), therefore, compatibility with the
adjacent properties should be enhanced. The proximity of
the subject property adjacent to (between) existing
commercial uses may present some problems as far as its
potential for residential development. Concerns regarding
compatibility of the proposed development with the
commercial uses can be further addressed during the site
plan review process, where the provision of adequate
buffering can be addressed.
Section 2.4.5(D)(5) (Rezoning Findings):
Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(0)(1) (Findings), in addition to
provisions of Section 3.1.1, the City Commission must make a
finding that the rezoning fulfills one of the reasons for which
the rezoning change is being sought. These reasons include the
following:
a. That the zoning had previously been changed, or was
~ originally established, in error;
,~
b. . That there has been a change in circumstances which
make the current zoning inappropriate;
c. That the requested zoning is of similar intensity as
allowed under the Future Land Use Map and that it is
more appropriate for the property based upon
circumstances particular to the site and/or
neighborhood.
The applicant has submitted a justification statement which
states the following:
.
. P & Z Board Staff Report
Rezoning from PC to RM at Lindell Blvd. and Federal Hwy.
Page 8
"The future land use map designates this property as a
Redevelopment Area. As such, the proposed rezoning RM
represents an intensity, which is less than that which the
future land use map allows. Therefore, rezoning this land
would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the
City of Delray Beach.
In addition, the subject property sits within a unique
corridor in Delray Beach. To the north is an intensely
developed commercial area, which includes automobile
dealerships, restaurants, shopping centers, offices, a
mall, and strip centers. To the east and west, however,
also bordering the C-15 Canal, are the residential
communities of Tropic Isles and Tropic Palms. Accordingly,
rezoning this property to RM will make the site more
compatible with the surrounding area by completing a
transitional residential band along the City's southeastern
boundary."
Comment: Item C is the applicable basis for the rezoning. The
property is adjacent to the C-15 Canal which lends itself well
to residential development. To the east and west of the
property are strip commercial developments which either abut or
are adjacent to residential developments. The RM zoning (medium
density) is as appropriate as PC and will result in a
development that is much less intense than PC. Given the
property's location, its development as multi-family may be more
realistic than a destination use (specialized commercial use).
Also, the development of the property as commercial (retail) may
not be realized given the high vacancy rate of adjacent
commercial properties and shopping centers and traffic
concurrency problems on South Federal Highway. Development of
the property as residential would be an inducement for the
redevelopment and development of surrounding properties within
the Redevelopment Area.
OTHER I T EMS .
.
Access Easement
'"
Adjacent. .to the southeast corner of the subject property there
is a vacant parcel of land to which there is no dedicated
access, thus the property is landlocked. The property became
landlocked through the abandonment of rights-of-way,
specifically Raton Court and Del-Raton Boulevard. Alternative
access to these properties was to have been granted through the
Lehman plat, which was never recorded. With a site plan
submittal, access must be provided to the landlocked parcel.
REVIEW B Y o THE R S .
.
The rezoning is not in a geographic area requiring review by the
CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) , the DDA (Downtown
Development Authority) or the HPB (Historic Preservation Board).
.
P & Z Board Staff Report
Rezoning from PC to RM at Lindell Blvd. and Federal Hwy.
Page 9
Special Courtesy Notice:
Courtesy notices were provided to the following homeowner's and
neighborhood associations:
* Pelican Harbor
* Tropic Bay
* Tropic Isles
* Tropic Palms
Public Notice:
Formal public notice has been provided to property owners within
a 500' radius of the subject property. Letters of objection, if
any, will be presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting.
ASS E SSM E N T AND CON C L U S ION :
The Rezoning from PC to RM for the subject property is
consistent with Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations.
Although the proposed zoning is not consistent with all elements
included in the description of Redevelopment Area 16, it is
consistent with other policies and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan. Based on the inconsistency, it may be more
appropriate to delete or amend that description than to deny the
proposal. Also, positive findings can be made with respect to
Section 2.4.5(D)(5) (Rezoning Findings), that the RM is as
appropriate if not ~ appropriate than PC and will result in-a
development that is much less intense than PC. The property is
adjacent to the C-15 Canal which lends itself well to
residential development. Development of the property as
residential would be an inducement the area and may encourage
redevelopment and development of surrounding properties within
the Redevelopment Area.
A L T ERN A T I V E ACT ION S .
.
A. Continue with direction.
B. Recgmmend approval of the rezoning request from PC to RM
bas~ upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3
(peF~Qrmance Standards) of the Land Development
RegUlations, policies of the Comprehensive Plan, and
Section 2.4.5(0)(5).
C. Recommend denial of the rezoning request from PC to RM
based upon a failure to make a positive finding with
respect to Consistency with the Redevelopment Area #6
description of the Comprehensive Plan Chapter, and that
pursuant to Section 2.4.5(0)(5) the rezoning fails to
fulfill at least one of the reasons listed .
.
.
P & Z Board Staff Report
. Rezoning from PC to RM at Lindell Blvd. and Federal Hwy.
Page 10
S T A F F R E COM MEN 0 A T ION :
A. Recommend to the City Commission approval of the rezoning
from PC (Planned Commercial) to RM (Medium Density
Residential) based upon positive findings with respect to
Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations, policies of
the Comprehensive Plan, and LDR Section 2.4.5(D)(5)(c)
(Rezoning Findings).
B. Recommend to the City Commission that as part of
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 95-1, the Redevelopment Area
#6 description be amended or deleted.
Attachments:
* Location/Zoning Map
* Survey
TILZNDELL.OOC
'?~..
~f{':;'"
:{f'-
I' .
_.'-.%. ~
f
I -- ~ ·
. c
,.' .
. LINDE " · ' '
," ~,__ {; ...., LL., .' ,.j.! ,
-. .......... .' , .
..', ,.'.' ~, 1 .~ I ,.
- -
-~ ~ ~ . -
._.........2:--..- -~ ,..- ,..' -"
"" ,,,,' . .~,.. -~-- ::..... - " ,,-
I, ."!J:~ I", ,"- -~ -,,;:--=!. "'= .. ';
/. , ~ AT Nn ". -' .
_,;. " (P.S.25 PGS 99 I ~'onlCIAL ~~ &01l1li . " \~. -.."
:-:> ' " ' . -102' r.._ -, · ..... ... .... ..
" " -- -,_.
- ., ..;i':'" "J' ~ .~ -
\....'...:,'J ,,' $'
. ~. " <I-
,~~;. . ; .
, 'f., - · "'-
.1... " ' ,~'" _.cr1.~ ~ ..
"...... . . 5 -- ·
.,y." ,'. a" ..... - ...,
~...td . "
... -
_ _~.' S ~I"l S(c-~.IOGI.Sl
. ~., - ----......................
...-~.....- ~
",' , ::;.:1:::- ~- ·
. , '..' ..- -
.: . ..... . '"
i; \' ~ .
.." C\_. ,,y .'
, .. .
"', ' .' . .:I:
. ,<:~ : ot"" .
,,' I 0'. . ~ I" ...."'.. 0..' 0....
,- .' ~ . "'. -
,', . ' " 0
. i;"" I
. ":= = ,.' ' " .
" .. . ' ---
. 1 ' · ..--_.."~_.. - ,<
.. . -,-" . ' '
, d];'" . oE\. - RATON PARK
" . I " 1 p,..I" pGS. 9, ,0'
l:l ...... ~O<T;of._"'.I.SI..IMTS,.C~I~
,< f~ , ,.- W.".("Vif,,"S aNDeItoMA\.' ."MDOMED
~~_ ~: \0..... ~~....~Iu.l. '.'
" '-,.-
. I 0"- ....
, . I
~. ..'
_,~; I ' " .r
I - ~ \ .' .-' I
t .f
I, J 6 i
, .
~ ,A ,- '"
'f" "" I
,'," . .....\ ... '
'iz~ '. ~,.,.it' n ·
'~',. 1: ,_ '.', -".~.....-.' 1..-:'1
.' \ " I ...~) 1, '
. ,.. 1- ( . I
.,' ' o' ' .' ' .,.
I z \. ,-- I :l:,"
. ' . . " .
t' '.' . ' .,
'.. \ ' ;, I
" 7" ., .
\ ," ~ - I
. t I
I ." ,," \.'
._ ' '_" , .' \ ~i j I j; " I
- ,.. ,. . . ,
'... ' .. I I
. . ,.'~ _' I
. " . 0 · I'
. . ... 1--'
...... " II
~l i /i \ I
'5.,....35.'" .' "1'
6~,.!'>' . ;. "
_ N. . '.. d 1
,w L.H€ ell - .
....... e.15-'" -
~ IItIb/~
.
M E M 0 RAN DUM ~5
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGERp;t1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM. /0. D.- MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 3-95
AUTOMOTIVE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT SPECIAL REGULATIONS
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
This is second reading and public hearing for Ordinance No. 3-95
which amends the Special Regulations of the Automotive Commercial
(AC) District by adding a provision for relief from open space
requirements under certain circumstances.
In the AC district, whenever an existing use or structure is
increased by 30% or more, the entire site must be brought into full
compliance with current codes. A requirement unique to the AC
district is that a minimum of 25% of the site must be left in open
space. In some instances this has created difficulties for
businesses seeking to upgrade their properties since site
constraints limit the amount of open space available. The proposed
amendment will allow some flexibility in the required upgrades
while not adversely affecting the original intent of the special
regulations.
The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item on December 19,
1994, and voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the amendment be approved
as drafted. During discussion at first reading on January 3, 1995,
the point was made that many of the City's automobile dealerships
were existing before the open space requirement became effective
and are grandfathered in with open space percentages of less than
25%. While the intent of the amendment is to provide some
flexibility, the concern was raised that there is nothing to
specifically prohibit a property owner in the process of upgrading
a site to reduce the percentage of open space beyond that currently
existing. The ordinance was passed on first reading by unanimous
vote with the inclusion of wording to this effect. The ordinance
has been modified to provide that in no instance shall the
percentage be reduced below the existing percentage of open space.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 3-95 on second and final
reading.
~qtd/
ref:agmemo11 (~IJ. ~
~)
(5 ) Relief from Open Space Requirements: Whenever the
requirement to brinq an existinq site into full compliance
triqqers a requirement'to increase the percentaqe of open
space pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.3.4(K), a
reduction of that requirement may be approved by the Site
Plan Review and Appearance Board; however, in no instance
shall the percentage be reduced below the existinq
percentaqe of open space. Concurrent with qranting a
reduction, the board must find that such reduction does not
diminish the practical application of the requirement,
particularly as it relates to the perimeter of the site.
~O'A - '/-0 ~ L D IL M!ltYirtYJ~
~ ''t&tt A (! ~ r€/J~~
O~ Sid. ct ,-/ /
eft.- ~~ ~ \~ 0fwv'~A1-J;i;.
~~ (
CD~lJ -rJw ~.~ ~~
c-
------- ~~
RECEIVED
II b I qL{
CITY CLERK
I I
!
ORDINANCE NO. 3-95
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 4.4.10,
II AUTOMOTIVE COMMERCIAL (AC) DISTRICTII, SUBSECTION
4.4.10(H), II SPECIAL REGULATIONSII, OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, BY ADDING A SUBPARAGRAPH (5) TO PROVIDE FOR
RELIEF FROM OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, SUBJECT TO
REQUIRED FINDINGSj PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER
CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to LOR Section 1. 1 . 6, the Planning and
Zoning Board reviewed the subject matter at its meeting of December
19, 1994, and has forwarded the change with a recommendation of
approval by a vote of 5 to OJ and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 163.3174(4)(c), the
Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, has
determined that the change is consistent with, and furthers the
obj,ectives and policies of, the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Chapter Four, IIZoning Regulationsll, Article
4.4, IIBase Zoning Districtl', Section 4.4.10, "Automotive Commercial
(AC) Districtll, Subsection 4.4.10(H), IISpecial Regulationsll, of the
Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be,
and the same is hereby amended by adding a subparagraph (5) to read as
follows:
i2l Relief from O~en Space Requirements:
Whenever the requirement to bring an existing site
into full compliance triggers a requirement to
increase the percentage of open space pursuant to the
provisions of Section 4.3.4(K). a reduction of that
requirement may be approved by the Site Plan Review
and Appearance Board: however. in no instance shall
the percentage be reduced below the existing
percentage of open space. Concurrent with granting a
reduction. the board must find that such reduction
does not diminish the practical application of the
requirement. particularly as it relates to the
perimeter of the site.
Section 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed.
, . , /
Section 3. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the 17th day of January , 1995.
ATTEST: ~~
(Jl1Mnirfl..c..M I ~ IIndry
City C erk
First Reading January 3, 1995
Second Reading January 17, 1995
- 2 - Ord. No. 3-95
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER t1iVf
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM * 10. &. - MEETING OF J'ANUARY 17. 1995
SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 2-95
" NOTICE AND PROCEDURAL REOUIREMENTS FOR ANNEXATIONS
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
This is second reading and public hearing for Ordinance No. 2-95
which amends three sections of the Land Development Regulations
regarding notice and procedural requirements for annexations. The
purpose of the amendments is to achieve consistency between the
LDRs and the Florida Statutes, as well as with the City Charter.
Also included are procedural requirements for non-voluntary
annexations which previously had not been addressed in the LDRs.
Please refer to the staff documentation for an analysis of the
proposed amendments.
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item on
December 19, 1994, and voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the proposed
changes be adopted. At first reading on January 3, 1995, the
Commission passed the ordinance by unanimous vote.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 2-95 on second and final
reading.
~ 5-0
ref:agmemo20
, .
;
ORDINANCE NO. 2-95
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 2.4.2,
"NOTICE REQUIREMENTS" , SUBSECTION 2.4.2(B)(1)(a),
"ANNEXATIONS", SECTION 2.4.5(C), "ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY" , AND ARTICLE 4.2, II ANNEXATION AND INITIAL
ZONING" , OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, TO CLARIFY NOTICE AND
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH VOLUNTARY AND
NON-VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS; PROVIDING A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to LOR Section 1.1.6, the Planning and
Zoning Board reviewed the subject matter at its meeting of December
19, 1994, and has forwarded the change with a recommendation of
approval by a vote of 5 to 0; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 163.3174(4) (c), the
Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, has
determined that the change is consistent with, and furthers the
objectives and policies of, the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Chapter Two, 'IAdministrative Provisions",
Article 2.4, "General Procedures II, Section 2 . 4 . 2 , "Notice
Requirements", Subsection 2.4.2(B) (1) (a), IIAnnexationsll, of the Land
Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and
the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
(B) Public Hearing Require_ents: The following notice
requirements and hearing procedures shall be complied with whenever an
action before a Board requires consideration at a public hearing.
These requirements are in addition to any requirements for public
hearing notice which are otherwise required by State Law or City
Commission procedures.
( 1 ) Notice. All public hearings shall be noticed
through letters to property owners, legal advertisements, or display
advertisements as set forth below.
(a) Annexations:
ill Non-voluntary: Notice requirements
contained within applicable sections of
Florida Statutes Chapter 171 shall apply.
,
.L2..l Voluntary: Notice requirements
contained within applicable sections of
Florida Statutes Chapter 171 and City Charter
SectiQn 2.03 shall apply. In addition. t1he
same procedures as are used for noticing a
rezoning shall apply..... ~9S /,.~ /,.~~~~,.~;t:9S~ /v;t:~li
t~_pS~~t /"tr/J /;tr/Jt;t:~~ /'YJ~f.r/Jt~ /t)!~ /'~~;t;t;t:;tw /~;t~
~r/J;t;t:;tW///~r/J~t~/////~r/JW~1~t'///~t///t)!~///~tty
~r/JP\P\t__tr/J;t / /l-~1~l-' / /t~~ / /~~~tttr/J;t"l- / /~r/Jtt~~
t~~~tt~p\~;tt_/_)!~l-l-/'YJ~/P\~~~I
I.;t:J ~f.t~t//f.;t:t_t//t~~~;t:;tW//r/Jf.//t~~//~;t,,~t;t:;tw
r/Jt~t;t;.~~~' I;' /;tr/Jtt~~ /_)!;.l-~ /'YJii6 /pS~'YJ~t_)!~~
r/J;t~~/;'/W~~~/f.r/Jt/f.r/J~t/~r/J;t_~~~tt1~/W~~~_/
1)!~ /;tr/J"t;t:~~ /_~;.l-l- /pStr/J1t~~ /"t~~ /r/Jt~tvi;.vi~~
;t~P\~~t'/;./'YJtt~f./~~_~ttpStt~vi/r/Jf./t~~/~;.vi~
tr/J/'YJ~/~;t;t~~~~'/;./p\~pS/~l-~~t~y/_)!r/Jw;t:viw/t)!~
;.t~;.'/~vi~/;./_t;.t~P\~vit/t)!;.t/t~~/~r/Jp\pS~~t~
l-~W;.l- /~~_~t;t:pSt;t:r/J;t /;.pi~ /r/Jt~;t:pi;.vi~~ /P\;.y /'YJ~
r/J'YJt~t;t~~ /f.tr/JP\ /t~~ /'lJf.f.;t:~~ /r/Jf. /t~~ /~tty
~~~t~//I.~~~t"t~t/~/~~'/~r/Jt~J
I.ttJ 1~~/_;t;.~tt~w/r/Jt~tvi;.;t~~/P\~_t/_t;.t_/t~;.t
t~_ /'YJr/J~pi~;.t;t:__ /r/Jf. /t~~ /I/-tty /r/Jf. /VJ_~t;.y
~_;.~~/;.t_/t_~_f.t;t_~/_r/J/;._/"tr/J/t;t~~~~~/t)!_
tt;.~t / /r/Jt / /tt~~t_ / /r/Jf. / /l-;.;t~ / /_r/J / /'YJ~tpiW
;.;t;t~~_~//l~~~tt~t/~/~~I.~Jl
I.tt;t:J1)!~/_;t;.~tt;tW/r/Jt~;t:pi~pi~_/_~~~l-/~_
pS~'YJ~t_)!_~ /t~ /f.~~~' /;.t /~_;._t /r/Jvi_ /ttP\_,
'YJ_tw_~;t //f.;t:t_t //;.;t~ //__~r/Jpi~ //t_~~tviW/
l~~~tt~t/~/~~I.'YJJl
Section 2. That Chapter Two, "Administrative Provisions",
Article 2.4, "General Procedures", Section 2.4.5, "Procedures for
Obtaining Development Approvals", Subsection 2.4.5(C), "Annexation of
Territory", of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
eC) Annexation of Territory:
( 1 ) Rule: The owner of land may seek the annexation
of contiguous property, under his ownership. The City may initiate an
annexation of private property if said right has been delegated via
provisions of a water service agreement or other agreement to that
end. Further, the City may initiate annexation of property pursuant
to Florida Statutes. ~pi~_t/"t)!t_/~;.tt_t/~;.__,/t~_/pStr/J1t_t~vi_/r/Jf./t~;.t
_t;.t~t_/;.t_/t;t/;.~~tttr/Jpi/t~/t)!_/t_~~tt~p\_pit_/~~;tt;.t;t_~/)!_t_tpi/
- 2 - Ord. No. 2-95
I
c
, I
(2) Required Information: A request for voluntary
annexation shall be in the form of a Petition to the City Clerk in
which a request for annexation is made. The petition must identify
the property to be annexed by legal description and must state the
desired zoning. A voluntary annexation petition 1~ must be
accompanied by a zoning application. In addition to information
required for the zoning action, an exhibit, prepared by a licensed
surveyor, which shows the points of contiguity shall be provided.
Requirements for non-voluntary annexations are pursuant to applicable
sections of Florida Statutes Chapter 171.
(3 ) Procedure: The voluntary annexation petition
shall be considered _tlll}4;l~_J'i~szl}4_;lt with the zoning application and
shall be subject to the zoning procedures. For voluntary annexations.
~J'i/_~~t~tszl~1 prior to second reading of the enacting ordinance by the
City Commission, notice of the annexation shall be published pursuant
to 2.4.2(B)(1)(a)l2l. Non-voluntary annexations require a
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board. and shall be
processed pursuant to applicable requirements of Florida Statutes
Chapter 171.
(4) Findings: 1J'i /_~~t~tszlJ'i /~szl /ttJ'i~tJ'i~_ /t~li}4tt~~ /tszlt
_~ttszl~ /tpJ'i /t)i~ /~tp~t~2f l_pp;lt~_ttszl~1 /t~he City Commission must make
findings that the annexation wt;l;l/~szl~/~t~_~~/_/~~W/~~~~tt/~~~;l_y~/_~~
~)i_~/~)i~/_~~~~_~tszl~ is consistent with Objective B-3 of the Land Use
Element. and complies with F.S. Chapter 171.
Section 3. That Chapter Four, "Zoning Regulations", Article
4.2, "Annexation and Initial Zoning" , of the Land Development
Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is
hereby amended to read as follows:
ARTICLE 4.2 ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING
Section 4.2.1 Authority for Annexations: The boundaries and corporate
limits of the City of Delray Beach now existing may be amended from
time to time, as provided by law, to extend to the ultimate municipal
boundaries as shown on the Future Land Use Map. (Note: Adapted from
Chapter II of the Charter)
Section 4.2.2 Requirements: ~~/szlt~~t/~szl/~_y~/ptszlp~t~t/_~~~~~~/~szl/~~~
ftttt I /__t~ /PtszlP~t~t /JI\)4_~ /}6~ /~tp~tt2f)4szl)4_1 A voluntary petition for
annexation must be prepared and processed pursuant to 2.4.5(C) with
public notice pursuant to 2.4.2(B) (1) (a) (2) and as provided for in
Florida Statutes Chapter 171. Non-voluntary annexations must be
prepared and, processed pursuant to applicable sections of Florida
Statutes Chapter 171.
- 3 - Ord. No. 2-95
, . 1
I
Section 4.2.3 Zoning: At the time of a voluntary annexation, a zoning
designation shall be applied to the property in a manner consistent
with the Future Land Use Map and the Comprehensive Plan. To this end,
a petition for voluntary annexation shall be processed concurrently
with a zoning petition. Notwithstanding the foregoing, under unique
circumstances a parcel of land may be annexed with zoning of
Agriculture (A) or Open Space (OS) and then be rezoned, at a later
date, through the formal rezoning processes for a designation more
appropriate to the Future Land Use Map. 1~~t~I//1~t_/t_/_/~~tt~_tt~~
tt~~/17~/~~~1~J/~~t~~/t_~~tt_~/_~~/t~ttt_~/~~~t~g/t~/~_/~t1~/~~~___
~t~_t~t__ /pt~yt~_~/l With non-voluntary annexations. the current
County land use and zoning designations shall remain in effect until
adoption of City land use and zoning desiqnations. The application
for assignment of City land use or zoning designations may be
initiated by the City or the property owner.
Section 4. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 5. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 6. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the 17th day of January , 1995.
ATTEST: ~~~
()L Mm'fTJ!.1' k.1fffj, I!rr 4
City C erk
First Reading January 3, 1995
Second Reading January 17, 1995
- 4 - Ord. No. 2-95
.
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER t1'Jt1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i 1./l.A . - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
FIRST READING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 6-95/ANNEXATION OF HIGH
POINT WEST AND SURROUNDING AREAS
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995
This is first reading for Ordinance No. 6-95 annexing High Point
West and surrounding areas to the City. The subject area contains
305.77 acres and extends from the northern limit of High Point West
south to the L-34 Canal, west to the E-3 Canal and east to Military
Trail. It also includes four properties on the east side of
Military Trail located just south of the Post Office. Assuming
passage by the City Commission, the ordinance will not become
effective until it is approved by a majority of those registered
electors voting in the area proposed to be annexed at a referendum
election on annexation scheduled for March 14, 1995.
As requested at the January 10th workshop, a report is attached
which analyzes the impact on the City's utilities operations should
we assume maintenance responsibility for the High Point West
utility system.
The Planning and Zoning Board formally considered this item at a
special meeting on January 9, 1995, and voted 5 to 0 to recommend
that the annexation be approved by the City Commission.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 6-95 on first reading. If
passed, a public hearing will be held on February 7, 1995.
&:a.f6 .A1.COnt/I1U/~ r!dtu; - /ncff JA?~
~ ~ ..sjfllj9S ~ M &-
~ o.Ll. ~
YJ7 o-I:zO-n td ~
5-0
ref:agmem024
,
FAILED ON FIRST READING - 1/17/95
ORDINANCE NO. 6-95
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ANNEXING TO THE CITY A COMPACT
AND CONTIGUOUS AREA OF UNINCORPORATED LAND GENERALLY
EXTENDING FROM THE NORTHERN LIMIT OF HIGH POINT WEST
SOUTH TO THE L-34 CANAL, WEST TO THE E-3 CANAL AND
EAST TO MILITARY TRAIL, AND INCLUDING FOUR PROPERTIES
ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILITARY TRAIL GENERALLY LOCATED
SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, AND AS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT IIAII TO THIS
ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE
PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED; REDEFINING THE
BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY TO INCLUDE SAID LAND;
PROVIDING FOR A REFERENDUM ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
MARCH 14, 1995, WITHIN THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE
ANNEXED; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF THE REFERENDUM ON
ANNEXATION; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A
SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach,
Florida, proposes to annex a compact and contiguous parcel of
unincorporated land generally extending from the northern limit of
High Point West south to the L-34 Canal, west to the E-3 Canal and
east to Military Trail, and including four properties on the east side
of Military Trail generally located south of the United States Post
Office, 'and as more particularly described in Exhibit IIAII which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the annexation of land referred to herein shall be
generally referred to as IIHigh Point West and Surrounding Areasll; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has
adhered to the procedures and requirements set forth in Chapter 171 of
the Florida Statutes related to municipal annexation; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has
determined that the area proposed for annexation, generally referred
to as "High Point West and Surrounding Areas" and as more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, meets all of the
requirements set forth in Chapter 171 of the Florida Statutes for an
area of unincorporated land proposed for annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
FAILED ON FIRST READING - 1/17/95
I,
I
FAILED ON FIRST READING - 1/17/95
Section 1. That the City Commission of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, hereby annexes to the City a compact and contiguous
parcel of unincorporated land generally extending from the northern
limit of High Point West south to the L-34 Canal, west to the E-3
Canal and east to Military Trail, and including four properties on the
east side of Military Trail generally located south of the United
States Post Office, and as more particularly described in Exhibit IIAII
which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2. That the land annexed pursuant to this ordinance
shall be generally referred to as "High Point West and Surrounding
Areas II .
Section 3. That the boundaries of the City of Delray Beach,
Florida, are hereby redefined to include the land described in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said land is hereby
declared to be within the corporate limits of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida.
Section 4. That a referendum election on annexation shall
I be held on March 14, 1995, within the area proposed to be annexed to
determine whether this annexation is approved by a majority of those
I registered electors voting in the area proposed to be annexed. This
referendum election on annexation shall be called and conducted and
the expense thereof paid by the City of De1ray Beach, Florida.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall not be effective
unless and until the referendum on annexation is approved by a
majority of the registered electors voting at the referendum election
to be held on March 14, 1995, within the area proposed to be annexed.
If a majority of the electors voting upon such question approve the
annexation, this ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after
the date of the referendum. If a majority of the electors voting upon
such question disapprove the annexation, this ordinance shall be null
and void, and the area proposed to be annexed shall not be the subject
of an annexation ordinance by the City of Delray Beach for a period of
two (2) years from the date of the referendum on annexation. The
question to be submitted to the electors at referendum shall be
substantially as follows:
- 2 - Ord. No. 6-95
FAILED ON FIRST READING - 1/17/95
J
FAILED ON FIRST READING - 1/17/95
PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF
HIGH POINT WEST AND SURROUNDING AREAS
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH PASSED ORDINANCE 6-95 FOR THE
PURPOSE OF ANNEXING TO THE CITY A COMPACT AND
CONTIGUOUS PARCEL OF UNINCORPORATED LAND GENERALLY
EXTENDING FROM THE NORTHERN LIMIT OF HIGH POINT WEST
SOUTH TO THE L-34 CANAL, WEST TO THE E-3 CANAL, EAST TO
MILITARY TRAIL, INCLUDING FOUR PROPERTIES ON THE EAST
SIDE OF MILITARY TRAIL LOCATED SOUTH OF THE POST
OFFICE, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"
TO ORDINANCE 6-95.
SHALL THE ABOVE DESCRIBED REFERENDUM ORDINANCE BE
ADOPTED?
FOR ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN ORDINANCE NO. 6-95
OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH YES
AGAINST ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN ORDINANCE NO. 6-95
OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BO
Section 6. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to publish notice of the referendum on annexation at least
once each week for two (2) consecutive weeks immediately preceding the
date of the referendum in a newspaper of general circulation in the
area in which the referendum is to be held, and to otherwise comply
with the requirements of Florida Statutes Section 171.0413, all other
applicable Florida Statutes, and the City of Delray Beach Charter and
Ordinances pertaining to the conduct of elections and annexations.
Section 7. That upon approval of this ordinance by the
electors as aforesaid, all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith shall be, and the same are hereby repealed as of the
effective date of this ordinance.
Section 8. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
- 3 - Ord. No. 6-95
FAILED ON FIRST READING - 1/17/95
, !
:
FAILED ON FIRST READING - 1/17/95
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the day of , 1995.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
First Reading
Second Reading
- 4 - Ord. No. 6-95
FAILED ON FIRST READING - 1/17/95
, ,
\
EXHIBIT · A. TO ORDINANCE NO. 6-95
DESCRIPTION
That part of Section 14, Township 46 South, Range 42 East, Palm Beach
County, Florida, described as follows:
Commence at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (S. E. 1/4)
of said Section 14; thence Easterly, along the South line of the said
Southeast Quarter (S.E. 1/4) of Section 14, 63.00 feet to the Point of
Beginning; thence continue Easterly, along said South line, 606.47
feet to the East line of the West Half (W. 1/2) of the Southwest
Quarter (S.W. 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (S. E. 1/4) of Section 14;
thence Northerly, along said East line, 25.00 feet to the South line
of Lot 12, BREE ZY ACRES, according to the Plat thereof recorded in
Plat Book 20, Page 79, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida; thence Easterly, along said South line and along the South
line of Lot 11 of said Plat of BREEZY ACRES, 669.59 feet to the
Southeast corner of said Lot 11; thence Northerly, along the East line
of Lots 5 through 11, inclusive, of said Plat of BREEZY ACRES, 844.04
feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 5; thence Westerly, along the
North line of said Lot 5, 300.00 feet to the East line of Markland
Lane as shown on the said Plat of BREEZY ACRES; thence Northerly,
along the said East line of Markland Lane, 489.6 feet, more or less,
to the South right-of-way line of State Road 806 (said South
right-of-way line being 60 feet South of and parallel with the Base
Line of Survey for State Road 806 as the Base Line of Survey is shown
in Road Plat Book 3, Page 26, of the Public Records of Palm Beach
County, Florida); thence Westerly, along said South right-of-way line,
977 feet, more or less, to a line 63.00 feet East of and parallel with
the West line of Southeast Quarter (S. E. 1/4) of said Section 14;
thence Southerly, along said parallel line and along the East
right-of-way line of Lake Worth Drainage District's right-of-way for
the E-3 Canal, 1362.3 feet, more or less, to the said Point of
Beginning.
TOGETHER WITH:
That part of the Northwest Quarter (N.W. 1/4) of Section 13, Township
46 South, Range 42 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, described as
follows:
Commence at the Southwest corner of the said Northwest Quarter (N.W.
1/4) of Section 13; thence Northerly, along the West line of said
Northwest Quarter (N.W. 1/4) of Section 13, 1046.01 feet to the North
line of the South Half (S. 1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (N.W. 1/4) of
Page 1 of 3 - Exhibit "A" to Ordinance No. 6-95
I ,
the Southwest Quarter (S. W. 1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (N.W. 1/4)
of said Section 13; thence Easterly, along said North line, 7.52 feet
to the East right-of-way line of State Road 809 (Military Trail) and
the Point of Beginning; thence continue Easterly, along the said North
line of the South Half (S. 1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (N.W. 1/4) of
the Southwest Quarter (S. W. 1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (N.W. 1/4)
of said Section 13, 664.28 feet to the East line of the said South
Half (S. 1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (N.W. 1/4) of the Southwest
Quarter (S.W. 1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (N.W. 1/4) of said Section
13; thence Southerly, along said East line, 348.63 feet to the South
line of the said South Half (S. 1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (N.W.
1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (S.W. 1/4) of the Northwest Quarter
(N.W. 1/4) of said Section 13; thence westerly, along said South line,
300.00 feet to a line 300.00 feet West of and parallel with the said
East line of the South Half (S. 1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (N.W.
1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (S.W. 1/4) of the Northwest Quarter
(N.W. 1/4) of said Section 13; thence Northerly, along said parallel
line, 318.63 feet to a line 30.00 feet South of and parallel with the
said North line of the South Half (S. 1/2) of the Northwest Quarter
(N.W. 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (S.W. 1/4) of the Northwest
Quarter (N.W. 1/4) of said Section 13; thence Westerly, along said
parallel line, 363.77 feet to the said East right-of-way line of State
Road 809 (Military Trail); thence Northerly, along said East
right-of-way line, 30.00 feet to the said Point of Beginning.
TOGETHER WITH:
Tha t part of Section 11 and Section 14, Township 46 South, Range 42
East, Palm Beach County, Florida, described as follows:
Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 14; thence Northerly,
along the East line of said Section 14, 1419.99 feet to the centerline
of State Road 806 (West Atlantic Avenue); thence Westerly, along said
centerline, 11. 57 feet to the centerline of State Road 809 (Military
Trail)j thence Northerly, along the said centerline of State Road 809,
60.88 feet; thence Westerly, at right angles, 85.28 feet to the Point
of Beginning; thence Northeasterly, 35.55 feet to a point on a line
60.00 feet West of and parallel with the said centerline of State Road
809; thence Northerly, along said parallel line, 2340.16 feet to a
point of curvature of a curve concave Easterly with a radius of
10525.40 feet and a central angle of 1 degree 50' 40" ; thence
Northerly, along the arc of said curve and along a curve 60.00 feet
Westerly of and concentric with the said centerline of State Road 809,
337.79 feet to the South line of the 25 foot right-of-way for McGovern
Lane, as shown on the Plat of ROCKLAND PARK recorded in Plat Book 24,
Page 23, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence
Page 2 of 3 - Exhibit "A" to Ordinance No. 6-95
, ,
,
Westerly, along said South line and along a line 25.00 feet South of
and parallel with the South line of Lots 14 through 26, inclusive,
Block 3 of the said Plat of ROCKLAND PARK, 1222.55 feet to a line
25.00 feet West of and parallel with the West line of Lots 13 and 14,
Block 3 and the West line of Lot 14, Block 2 of the said Plat of
ROCKLAND PARK; thence Northerly, along said parallel line, 420.01 feet
to the intersection with the Westerly extension of the North line of
Lots 14 through 26, inclusive, Block 2, ROCKLAND PARK; thence
Easterly, along said extension and along the North line of Lots 14
through 26, inclusive, Block 2, 1237.03 feet to a point on a curve
concave Easterly with a radius of 10525.40 feet and a central angle of
o degrees 57' 10"; thence Northerly, along the arc of said curve and
along a curve 60.00 feet west of and concentric wit~ the said
centerline of State Road 809, 175.02 feet to a point of reverse
curvature of a curve concave Westerly with a radius of 10405.40 feet
and a central angle of 2 degrees 17' 34"; thence Northerly, along the
arc of said curve and along a curve 60.00 feet Westerly of and
concentric with the said centerline of State Road 809, 416.37 feet to
the North line of the parcel described in Official Record Book 4361,
Page 95 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence
Easterly, along the Easterly extension of said North line, 5.16 feet
to a line 60.00 feet West of and parallel with the said East line of
Section 14; thence Northerly, along said parallel line, 384.48 feet to
the North line of said Section 14; thence Northerly I along a line
60.00 feet West of and parallel with the East line of said Section 11,
670.97 feet to the North line of the Plat of HIGH POINT OF DELRAY WEST
PLAT NO.3, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 42,
Pages 180 and 181 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Floridaj
thence Westerly, along said North line, 2547.71 feet to a line 60.00
feet East of and parallel with the West line of the Southeast Quarter
(S.E. 1/4) of said Section llj thence Southerly, along said parallel
line, 673.81 feet to the South line of said Section 11; thence
continue Southerly, along a line 60.00 feet East of and parallel with
the West line of the Northeast Quarter (N.E. 1/4) of said Section 14,
2816.19 feet to the South line of the said Northeast Quarter (N.E.
1/4) of Section 14; thence Easterly, along said South line, 10.00 feet
to a line 70.00 feet East of and parallel with the West line of the
Southeast Quarter (S.E. 1/4) of said Section 14; thence Southerly,
along said parallel line, 1257.63 feet to a line 60.00 feet North of
and parallel with the said centerline of State Road 806 (West Atlantic
Avenue); thence Easterly along said parallel line, 2510.18 feet to the
said Point of Beginning.
Page 3 of 3 - Exhibit "A" to Ordinance No. 6-95
,I
L-30 CANAL
. .-.-. --.-- a
ILl ~
I ~ ~
. ~ i
c:J
~ . ~ t;
e: ~._._._. ~ ~
. a ~ ~
I ltl
. LAKE lOA ROAD
IS
~
~
m
-r'-.'"
.-. .
I
.
,..._..J
.
Iw
. Sir 51
I ~
..._.J ~
~
. III ...
I D
> . ~ ~ ~
! ! ltl
;! 1 ::;)
::a . LawsON BOULEVARD 2
8 ~
~
~ u
r:
~
'"
c:
~
t /.
z (._.
~
u
'"
J,
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.--.-.-.
l-J8 CANAl
CII'Y uwrrs -.-.- LOCATION MAP FOR
PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA
J aiLE I
I
SCALE
N --------- PROPOSED CITY UNITS -
-
CITY or IlD.RAr 8l:N:H, Fl EXISTING CITY L1MIlS AREA 10 BE ANNEXED
I'\NtNINC DEPARnIENl -.-.-.-.-.-.-
-- DlarAL SIlSl" IIItP SYSTnI __
-- '.....-..-.
. ~
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden /1 f" ~
City Manager ~
FROM: Richard C. Hasko, P.E.
Deputy Director of Public utilities
SUBJECT: HIGHPOINT WEST I, II, III
CITY ASSUMPTION OF UTILITIES
MAINTENANCE
DATE: January 13, 1995
Attached is an outline of staff's analysis of the
operational condition of the potable water distribution
system and wastewater cOllection/transmission system within
sections I, II and III of the Highpoint West Condominium.
This analysis was prepared to evaluate the anticipated
impacts on the City's Public utilities capital and
operations & maintenance budgets in the event the City
elects to assume operation and maintenance responsibilities
for the systems, and to assist ci ty Commission in
consideration of that decision.
Public utilities currently maintains 275 miles of water
main, 305 miles of sewer main and 114 sewage lift stations
as well as all water supply, treatment and storage
facilities. Assumption of the Highpoint West systems would
add 4.5 miles of water main, 4.8 miles of sewer main and two
sewage lift stations to our O&M program.
visual inspections of the Highpoint utility systems were
conducted by utilities maintenance staff to determine the
operational condition of system components and to establish
a basis for comparison with the City's existing facilities.
Inspection methods included excavation of water mains,
closed circuit televising of approximately 1,600 feet of
gravity sewer mains, and inspection of lift station
facilities including drawdown tests of pumps and testing of
electric panels.
Results of testing and inspection based upon random
inspection methods indicate that the systems are in
reasonably good operational condition comparing favorably
with existing City facilities. Water mains are cement lined
ductile iron pipe and gravity sewers are PVC with precast
concrete manhole structures. There is no indication of any
significant water main leakage and closed circuit television
inspection of sewers indicate a free flowing non-obstructed
condition.
Inspection of the lift stations revealed the requirement for
minor remedial work to ensure reliable and efficient
operation. In general, the installations compare favorably
with existing City facilities.
Capital costs for required system improvements include
$130,00.00 for construction of two interconnects as
recommended in the City's Water Distribution Master Plan to
improve pressure and water quality, and $26,000.00 for
installation of telemetry equipment at the two lift stations
and performance of minor remedial work. Total Capital cost
is estimated at $156,000.00.
Since system inspection revealed no unusual O&M conditions,
it can be assumed that the City's current cost per unit of
each type of facility maintained can be applied to the
system components to establish the anticipated increase in
O&M expenses. On this basis, annual operation and
maintenance cost increases for water distribution,
wastewater collection and lift station maintenance are
estimated at $10,971.00, $8,606.00, and $20,412.00
respectively for a total of $39,989.00.
In addition, revenues will decrease by an estimated
$84,400.00 as a result of annexing Highpoint West into the
City, thereby eliminating the 25% out of City surcharge for
water and sewer service currently billed to Highpoint West.
The total annual impact on the O&M budget then, is
anticipated to be $124,389.00. This represents an
approximate 5.2% increase in composite O&M budgets for Water
Distribution, Wastewater Collection and Lift Station
Maintenance, and an approximate 1.5% increase in the overall
Public utilities Operating budget.
On the basis of our findings regarding system operational
conditions and anticipated budgetary increases , it is our
opinion that assumption of the Highpoint West utility system
will have no significant adverse impact on utilities
operations. However we recommend detailed inspection of the
entire utility system be performed prior to acceptance by
the City and the cost of any remedial repair work identified
by that inspection be born by the Highpoint West Condominium
Association.
Should you have any questions or comments in this regard,
please contact me at ext. 7303.
RCH: jem
c: William H. Greenwood
Joseph Safford
Diane Dominquez
f: T/F CM
Annexations
HIGHPOINT WEST UTILITY SYSTEM
ANALYSIS OF CONDITION/O&M COST
POTABLE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
SYSTEM COMPONENTS (Aae of Approximatelv 15 Yrs.}
o 24,000'+ of 6" to 10" cement lined ductile iron
pipe
o 36 Fire hydrants
o 33 valves
SYSTEM CONDITION
o Based on visual inspection (potholing/excavation) of
system components and interviews with previous
maintenance company, the water distribution system is
considered to be in reasonably good condition with no
unusual history of main breakage. Most problems
experienced have been with service line breaks.
System condition compares favorably with existing
City facilities.
ANTICIPATED CAPITAL COSTS
o Installation of two supplemental system
interconnections per Water Distribution Master Plan
recommendations to improve pressure and water
quality. Estimated cost: $130,000.00
ESTIMATED OPERATION & MAINTENANCE COST
o Current annual O&M cost/mile of water main: $2438.00
o Length of system addition: 4.5 miles
o Estimated O&M increase: 4.5 mi x 2438/mi = $10,971.00
WASTEWATER COLLECTION/TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
SYSTEM COMPONENTS (Age of ADDroximatelv 15 Yrs.}
o 22,000':1: of 8" gravity sewer (PVC)
o 114+ manholes (Precast Concrete)
o 3 sewage lift stations (submersible type)
o 3,100':1: of 4" to 8" force main
SYSTEM CONDITION
o Gravitv sewer: Based on visual and closed circuit
TV inspection, the gravity sewer system is considered
to be in reasonably good condition with no unusual
history of breakage or stoppage. Lines are clean
with unrestricted flow. Manholes are in good
condition. No indication of significant Inflow or
Infiltration. System compares favorably with
existing city facilities.
o Lift stations: One of the three lift stations is
currently maintained by the City. The remaining two
stations have been inspected by utilities Maintenance
personnel and have been found to be in reasonably
good condition but in need of cleaning and upgrading
of some facility components. Condition of facilities
is comparable to existing City Lift stations.
o Anticipated Capital Costs
o Installation of Telemetry for remote monitoring
@ $8,000-/L.S.: $16,000.00
o Replacement of gate valves & check valves (both
stations): $ 7,600.00
o Upgrading of electrical panels for emergency
generator connections: $ 2.400.00
o Total cost: $26,000.00
o Estimated O&M Increase
o Current annual O&M Cost/mile of
sewer main: $1,793.00
o Length of system addition - 4.8 mi.
o Estimated O&M increase: $8,606.00
o Current annual O&K cost/L.S.: $10,206.00
o Add'l Facilities: 2
o Estimated O&M Increase: $20.412.00
o Total Wastewater system
O&M increase: $29,018.00
COST SUKKARY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (ONE TIME COSTS)
o Water Distribution $130,000.00
o Wastewater Collection/Trans. $26,000.00
o Total Capital Impact $156.000.00
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE (ANNUAL COST)
o Water Distribution $10,971.00
o Wastewater Collection/Trans. $29.018.00
o Total O&M Increase $39,989.00
o Revenue Decrease $84,400.00
o Total O&M Impact $124.389.00
o Net impact on divisional O&M Budget 5.2% Increase
o Net impact on Public utilities O&M Budget 1.5%
Increase
PRELIMINARY INSPECTION REPORT
HIGH POINT LIFT STATIONS
84D AND 84E
1/12/95
.
LIFT STATION 84D
General Electrical Notes:
Main Breaker: 50 amps
Pump Breakers: 30 amps
Pump #1 Amperage: 12.8, 14.3, 14.1
Pump #2 Amperage: 13.2, 14.8, 15.1
Starters: Furnace
Station has generator plug, but has no emergency breakers or
provisions for installation.
Pressure Readings: The line was tapped and a pressure
gauge was installed. There was no
pressure in the force main while
drilling/tapping. The pressure
with both pumps running is 10 psi.
Hour Meters: Pump #1 is 1,000 hours
Pump #2 is 269 hours
Valve Box: Station needs three new 4" gate ~g'~~
valves and two new check valves.
Electrical: Estimated upgrades would require
two new starters, and provisions
for generator. Estimated cost
$1,000.00.
Telemetry: Station would require telemetry
estimated cost $8,000.00.
.
LIFT STATION 84E
General Electrical Notes:
Main Breaker: 50 amps
Pump Breakers: 30 amps
Pump #1 Amperage: 8.5, 9.6, 8.6
Pump 12 Amperage: 12.2, 13.2, 12.3
Starters: Square D
Station needs generator plug and all necessary electrical
provisions.
Pressure Readings: The line was tapped and a pressure
gauge was installed. There was no
pressure in the force main while
drilling/tapping. The pressure
with both pumps running is 8 psi.
Hour Meters: Pump #1 is 2,380 hours
Pump #2 is 1,981 hours
Valve Box: Station needs three new 4" gate ~~tJO P.ft.
valves and two new check valves.
Electrical: Estimated upgrades would require a
new disconnect, provisions for the
generator and repairing existing
control cabinet. Estimated Cost
$1,400.00.
Telemetry: Station would require telemetry
estimated cost $8,000.00.
Noticeable Problems: Rails are broken, possible broken
concrete around invert, shrubbery
conceals FPL meter and wet well is
full of debris.
- .
PRESENT MAINTENANCE
Management Company
Mr. Cittadino
407-279-0555
Maintenance Contract
Paul Baker
305-781-8446
cgcp.doc
T""'" '. i "'~" -
. :".. T *'__.._--..4...... .. ,~_._-------
. . )'-l.
. ',.. \,
. "..
'. .
. .. .
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH - ENVIRONMENTAL 'SERVICES DEPARTMENT
. TV INSPECTION HARDCOPY
_____ a. _'..".__ ._. .~_.__.__a. _ ____
REPORT DATE 01/12/95 1:15 PM REQUESTED BY FRANK HOUSTON .
REPORT NO. CR3351V1 PAGE 1
MANHOLE NUMBERS 084C-0.7., ..1.'0. Q84C-0~4 -.-,
UPS ADDRESS 14325 HIGH POINT LAKE TR S QUAL ENTRANCE
DWN ADDRESS HIGH 'pOINT LAKE TR S QUAL
AREA LIFT STATION BASIN #84C LOCATION EASEMENT, GOOD ACCESS
SURFACE OPEN AREA . . . PIPE TYPE POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE
PROJECT HIGH POINT PIPE WIDTH/DIAM. ,8 ~.OO PIPE DETER N
JOB NUMBER SECTION -1 REVERSE SET'UP .. . N SKETCH N
TV DATE 01/12/95 I LENGTH 313 PRIOR HISTORY N
OPERATOR 426 UPS DEPTH 9.4 CONDITION RATINGS:
WEATHER CLEAR OWN DEPTH 10.0 STRUCTURAL 0
VTR FORMAT VHS ,.. JOINT LENGTH 13 1/1 0
TAPE NUMBER 001 . FLOW DEPTH 0.4 ROOT 0
VTR INDEX 000000 TO OOaOOO MAIN LINE 0
SUMMARY: MAINLINE LOOKSiOOD.MANHOLECONE-BROKEN. CRACKED.
RECOMMENDATIONS: ..
FOOTAGE VTR CLOCK PICTURE
READING LOC POS DESCRIPTION NUMBER
. '.- p.." -. _.....-..... ~-,......~... .... . s-. _-~-__'... ,.-__. ......,. ~_'''.e''.- _.'_ ................_... .... .-..~-- -....- .-- - -.-. ....... -...... - . ....----...--.....--.
U 0.0 0 .
&
COMMENTS: MANHOLE #047
U 28.0 0 AL~GNMENT. BEGIN BELLY IN PIPE
U 37.0 0 AL GNMENT END OF BELLY
U 81.0 0 ALIGNMENT. "~~': ~BEGIN BELLY IN PIPE.
U 85.0 0 ALIGNMENT . .: END OF BELLY
U 220.0 0 ALIGNMENT BEGIN BELLY IN PIPE
U 313.0 0 ALIGNMENT END OF BELLY
COMMENTS: MANHOLE #044 ,
, ,'.
, . .
. ._. a ~
.. .
.
I
~.
~. -'-... . --
~
- ',-, -.'
.
;:) . --- --- ~ . .~__. u__ "._.....__.....~ .
. .- ..- ...- -- -- ~ - - -- . _..~_______.__. .__ I
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
. TV INSPECTION HARDCOPY
REPORT DATE 01/12/95 1:59 PM - - - - REQUESTED BY FRANK-HOOS'l'ON
REPORT NO. CR3351Vl PAGE 1
MANHOLE NUMBERS 084C-046 TO 084C-044
UPS ADDRESS 14308 HIGH POINT.LAKE TR S QUAL LOCATED IN GRASS
DWN ADDRESS HIGH ~OINTLAKE TR S QUAL
AREA LIFT STATION BASIN t84C . LOCATION EASEMENT, POOR ACCESS
SURFACE OPEN AREA PIPE TYPE POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE
PROJECT HIGH POINT PIPE WIDTH/DIAM 8.00 PIPE DETER N
JOB NUMBER SECTION -1 t REVERSE SET UP Y SKETCH N
TV DATE 01/12/95 LENGTH 277 PRIOR HISTORY N
OPERATOR 426 . UPS DEPTH 4.0 CONDITION RATINGS:
.
WEATHER CLEAR . DWN DEPTH 10.0 STRUCTURAL 0
I
VTR FORMAT VHS JOINT LENGTH 0 1/1 0
TAPE NUMBER 001 FLOW DEPTH 0.0 ROOT 0
VTR INDEX 000000 TO 000000 MAIN LINE 0
SUMMARY: DROPMANHOLE LobKS OK. UPSTERAM MANHOLE ACCESSIBLE HARD TO GET TO.
".. ...... .....-. " .' .
RECOMMENDATIONS:
.
.....
FOOTAGE VTR CLOCK PICTURE
READING LOC POS DESCRIPTION NUMBER
... ... --... .--.-.-". -. -.- ---- --- -_.'- _.- . .,- ---
U 0.0 0 ALIGNMENT - . . BEGIN BELLY IN PIPE
COMMENTS: MANHOLE #004 HOLDING WATER
U 21.0 0 ALIGNMENT END OF BELLY
U 105.0 3 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 130.0 9 LATERAL _FACTORY SERVICE
U 216.5 3 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 229.0 9 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 264.0 3 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 277.0 0
COMMENTS: MANHOLE #046
.. ....
. -,
;
of--J-'::'
\ ;
;~(~ '.
. .
. . ,
li!:
.
.
, .- .. ..- .-
~
.
1>>;
e\
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
, TV INSPECTION HARDCOPY
REPORT DATE 01/12/95 1:59 PM REQUESTED BY FRANK HOUSTON _
REPORT NO. CR3351V1 PAGE 1
.
MANHOLE NUMBERS OB4C-045 TO 084C-044
'.
UPS ADDRESS 14329 HIGH POINT LAKE TR S QUAL NEXT TO PALM IN GRSS
DWN-ADDRESS HIGH POINT LAKE TR S QUAL
AREA LIFT STATION BASIN t84C LOCATION EASEMENT, POOR ACCESS
SURFACE OPEN AREA PIPE TYPE POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE
PROJECT HIGH POINT PIPE WIDTH/DIAM 8.00 PIPE DETER N
JOB NUMBER SECTION -1 t. REVERSE SET UP Y SKETCH N
it
TV DATE 01/12/95 LENGTH 292 PRIOR HISTORY N
OPERATOR 426 UPS DEPTH 3.6 CONDITION RATINGS:
WEATHER CLEAR . DWN DEPTH 10.0 STRUCTURAL 0
VTR FORMAT VHS JOINT LENGTH 13 1/1 0
TAPE NUMBER 001 FLOW DEPTH 0.2 ROOT 0
VTR INDEX 000000 TO 000000 MAIN LINE 0
SUMMARY:
RECOMMENDATIONS: ~
FOOTAGE VTR CLOCK PICTURE
READING LOC POS DESCRIPTION NUMBER
.. e.. .._ . _ _ .. ~.... _. - .. _. --- .. ..- -~- ,._,w. _ _ .... .... M
U 0.0 0 .
COMMENTS: MANHOLE #044
U 41.0 9 LAT.ERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 42.0 3 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 229.0 3 LATERAL ,'. . FACTORY SERVICE
U 275.0 3 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 292.0 0
COMMENTS: MANHOLE #045
-- - . \'
(~. . -- . ','" ..
. -
.-.
.. ",.
.-
.
....
..
,I.,
.
..
-.....
I ..
",-.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
. TV INSPECTION HARDCOPY
REPORT DATE 01/12/95 2:00 PM REQUESTED BY FRANK HOUSTON
REPORT NO. CR3351V1 \ PAGE 1
MANHOLE NUMBERS 084C-070 TO 084C-068
UPS ADDRESS 14180 APT -C SW QUAL BEHIND HEDGES
DWN ADDRESS HIGH POINT WEST PHASE 3 QUAL
AREA LIFT STATION BASIN f84C LOCATION EASEMENT, POOR ACCESS
SURFACE ASPHALT STREET PIPE TYPE POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE
PROJECT HIGH POINT PIPE WIDTH/DIAM 8.00 PIPE DETER N
JOB NUMBER SECTION-3 REVERSE SET UP Y SKETCH N
TV DATE 01/12/95 - LENGTH 196 PRIOR HISTORY N
OPERATOR 426 ; UPS DEPTH 3.0 CONDITION RATINGS:
WEATHER - .~ CLEAif.....---.. I~- -.... ~D'WN- DE'P'ifH '-'''---3";1---'--' ~. . -"'STRUCTURAL 0
VTR FORMAT VHS · JOINT LENGTH 13 1/1 0
TAPE NUMBER 001 FLOW DEPTH 0.0 ROOT 0
VTR INDEX 000000 TO 000000 MAIN LINE 0
SUMMARY:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
FOOTAGE VTR CLOCK PICTURE
READING LOC POS DESCRIPTION NUMBER
.. _ ._~, __. ..__ _____ L__ - - . .- -'" ,-. -- .._. h._.~. ..___
U 0.0 0
COMMENTS: MANHOLE 1068
U 90.0 9 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 188.5 9 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 191.0 9 LATERAL :FACTORY SERVICE
U 196.0 0
COMMENTS: MANHOLE 1070
"
. ,
- ~ -. '; .
~ '. '"
".. q', -. ........, .1'." ."
,
.-
.
.'
.
. , ,
.";
.. '. '. .
:.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TV INSPECTION HARDCOPY
REPORT DATE 01/12/95 2:00 PM REQUESTED BY FRANK HOUSTON
REPORT NO. CR3351V1 PAGE 1
MANHOLE NUMBERS 084C-069 TO 084C-068
UPS ADDRESS 14180 SW QUAL
DWN ADDRESS HIGH fOINT WEST PHASE 3 QUAL
AREA LIFT STATION BA~.N #84C LOCATION EASEMENT, POOR ACCESS
SURFACE OPEN AREA . . .' PIPE TYPE POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE
PROJECT HIGH POINT , PIPE WIDTH/DIAM 8.00 PIPE DETER N
JOB NUMBER SECTION-2 REVERSE SET UP Y SKETCH N
TV DATE 01/12/95 LENGTH 215 PRIOR HISTORY N
OPERATOlt - -426" ----...--- ~--.'- --....---..-UPS..DEP'TH '''" ..-----.~. ..-..... CONDITIOW- RA'TINGS:
WEATHER CLEAR DWN DEPTH 3.4 STRUCTURAL 0
VTR FORMAT VHS JOINT LENGTH 13 1/1 0
TAPE NUMBER 001 . FLOW DEPTH 0.0 ROOT 0
VTR INDEX 000000 TO 000000 MAIN LINE 0
SUMMARY: .
RECOMMENDATIONS:
FOOTAGE VTR CLOCK " PICTURE
READING LOC POS r DESCRIPTION NUMBER
.
.. -.-...- _.. ~ -- - ._. - - - .- ...... _._0..
U 0.0 0 J:
COMMENTS: MANHOLE #069 - - - .
U 26.0 3 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 120.0 0 ALIGNMENT BEGIN BELLY IN PIPE
U 127.0 O' ALIGNMENT END OF BELLY
U 136.5 3 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 139.0 9 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 201. 0 9 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 203.0 3 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 215.0 0
COMMENTS: MANHOLE #069
,
/ .
....
..
.
-
-
-~. ' . . ...:..' '. - ~ ....
-.
,
.,
.
.......
,
.~~~;.
.~ .
to-
(
~.
" I' 'f'
-... -
c
.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TV INSPECTION HARDCOPY
REPORT DATE 01/12/95 2:16 PM REQUESTED BY FRANK HOUSTON
REPORT NO. CR3351V1 PAGE 1
MANHOLE NUMBERS 084D-023 TO 084D-020
UPS ADDRESS 14504 HIGH POINT WEST PHSAE 2 SW QUAL
DWN ADDRESS HIGH POINT WEST PHASE 2 QUAL
AREA LIFT STATION BASIN #84D LOCATION EASEMENT, POOR ACCESS
SURFACE OPEN AREA PIPE TYPE POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE
PROJECT HIGH POINT PIPE WIDTH/DIAM 8.00 PIPE DETER N
JOB NUMBER SECTION -2 REVERSE SET UP N SKETCH N
TV DATE 01/12/95 LENGTH 180 PRIOR HISTORY N
OPERATOR 426 UPS DEPTH 3.7 CONDITION RATINGS:
WEATHER CLEAR \ DWN DEPTH 0.0 STRUCTURAL 0
VTR FORMAT VHS JOINT LENGTH 0 1/1 0
TAPE NUMBER 001 fLOW DEPTH 0.0 ROOT 0
VTR INDEX 000000 TO 001000 MAIN LINE 0
SUMMARY:
RECOMMENDATIONS: '/,'
),
FOOTAGE VTR CLOCK I , PICTURE
READING LOC POS ~. DESCRIPTION NUMBER
.. _.-. ..- .-. --- .. - -- .. - "._--._- Ir-' ~_______u - . - . .~. .~u ..... .~. -
U 0.0 0
COMMENTS: MANHOLE 020 -.'~',. ,",
U 94.5 0 "
COMMENTS: GASH IN PIPE POSSIBLE WATER INFILTRATION AT SOMETIME.
U 96.5 3 LATERAL .., '~, FACTORY SERVICE
U 162.0 3 LATERAL ~ .'. FACTORY SERVICE
U 165.0 9 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 180.0 0 .
COMMENTS: MANHOLE #023
t
.
. .
.'. -.
~
."-'
. -
",-'.
~ -'
~~ .
... ,,- . -,
c<
.-."'
f
I
. .'
c
~
--.:
"
" CITY OF DELRAY BEACH - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TV INSPECTION HARDCOPY
REPORT DATE 01/12/95 2:16 PM REQUESTED BY FRANK HOUSTON
REPORT NO. CR3351Vl PAGE 1
MANHOLE NUMBERS 084D-025 TO 084D-020
UPS ADDRESS 14658 HIGH POINT WEST PHASE 2 SW QUAL
DWN ADDRESS HIGH POINT WEST PHASE 2 QUAL
AREA LIFT STATION BASIN #84D LOCATION EASEMENT, POOR ACCESS
SURFACE OPEN AREA PIPE TYPE POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE
PROJECT HIGH POINT PIPE WIDTH/DIAM 8.00 PIPE DETER N
JOB NUMBER SECTION -2 REVERSE SET UP N SKETCH N
TV DATE 01/12/95 LENGTH 193 PRIOR HISTORY N
OPERATOR 426 .t: UPS DEPTH 3.9 CONDITION RATINGS:
WEATHER CLEAR .. DWN DEPTH 0.0 STRUCTURAL 4
VTR FORMAT VHS JOINT LENGTH 0 I/I 0
TAPE NUMBER 001 FLOW DEPTH 0.0 ROOT 0
VTR INDEX 000000 TO 000000 MAIN LINE 2
SUMMARY: , . .~..,. '- . . ..... . ."- ... . - ..
RECOMMENDATIONS:
FOOTAGE VTR CLOCK .., PICTURE
.
READING LOC POS DESCRIPTION NUMBER
.---....-- .- .-- -".,. ..- .~. -.-. - --_. - -...,._.~ --- .... --.- .-. ... -~ .---- - - ,.....
U 0.0 0
COMMENTS: MANHOLE #020
U 29.0 0
COMMENTS: DENT IN PIPE !-
U 148.0 0 MISALIGNED JOINT DRP JT.>. 90% CLEAR
U 167.0 3 LATERAL FACTORY SERVICE
U 193.0 0
COMMENTS: MANHOLE #025
.
.- -.
. . .-.
.~ ~ -- "-",. ".' :~. ;,"
. ".':'; ..:..... :..
. -"",",:"',-'-"'.
.. .,. .--. . - .
. ,..... .~ -.. . .... '- ;.-
'. ..... .- '.
. ..
.
. .'.
.
.
(I<
rfJ11
I
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
THRU: ~~~
~~ OF PLANN~ & ZONING
FROM: PAUL DORL~CIPAL PLANNER
SUBJECT: REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 1995
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. t, -95 - ANNEXING
HIGH POINT WEST AND SURROUNDING AREAS.
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
approval on first reading of an ordinance annexing High
Point West and surrounding areas.
The subject annexation area is 305.77 acres and extends
from the northern limit of High Point West south to the
L-34 canal, west to the E-3 canal and east to Military
Trail including four properties on the east side of
Military Trail south of the post office (see Exhibit A).
BACKGROUND:
At the workshop meeting of October 11, 1994, the City Commission
discussed the reserve annexation area that is west of Military
Trail. This area includes High Point West, Country Club Acres,
Marketplace of Delray, numerous vacant parcels, and several
other individual commercial and residential structures.
The outcome of the discussion was direction to proceed in a
timely manner with the annexation of those areas as provided for
in Florida Statutes. The appropriate means available in the
Florida Statutes for an overall annexation of such a large,
diverse area is by referendum.
The proposed referendum boundaries include those areas that
already have services, as well as some adjacent vacant parcels
that will receive services as development occurs. The
areas to be included are listed as #4, #5, and #7 in Future Land
Use Element Policy B-3. 4 of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The
area contains a total of 305.77 acres, including 171.67 acres of
multi-family (High Point West), 26.11 acres of developed single
family residential, 13.07 acres of vacant residential, 49.03
acres of developed commercial, 33.49 acres of vacant potential
residential/commercial mix, and 12.40 acres of canals and roads.
The estimated total population in the annexation area is 1,581
persons.
If passed on first reading the second and final reading of the
ordinance would occur on February 7, 1995. Florida Statute
requires passage of an ordinance by City Commission a minimum
of 30 days prior to the holding of the referendum. The
referendum is scheduled for March 14, 1995.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
At a special meeting on January 9th, 1995 the Planning and
Zoning Board reviewed the Urban Services Report and provided a
recommendation on the annexation of High Point West and
surrounding areas. The Board voted 5-0 (Golder and Bonardi
absent) to recommend approval by City Commission of the
annexation.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approve Ordinance No. 0-95 on first reading.
.
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGERtJ;v1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM it I:. 13 - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
FIRST READING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 7-95/BOAT STORAGE PERMIT
UE
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
This is first reading for Ordinance No. 7-95 which amends Section
101.35(F) of the City Code by increasing the permit fee for boat
storage on the municipal beach. The proposed fee is $300.00, plus
tax.
The increase is presented in response to direction received from
the Commission at the January 10th workshop. The Director of Parks
and Recreation also recommends the increased fee.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 7-95 on first reading. If
passed, a public hearing will be held on February 7, 1995.
p~ 6-0
ref:agmemo19
I I
, )
ORDINANCE NO. 7-95
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 101.35,
· STORING BOATS" , OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SUBSECTION
101.35(F) TO PROVIDE FOR AN INCREASE IN THE PERMIT
FEE FOR BOAT STORAGE ON THE MUNICIPAL BEACH;
PROV!DING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE,
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 101.35 of the City Code,
permits for boat storage on the municipal beach are issued by the City
of Delray Beach; and
WHEREAS, a fee is required to be submitted with the
application for a boat storage permit; and
WHEREAS, the permi t fee for boat storage on the municipal
beach has not been increased since 1989; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it to be in the public
interest to increase the fee for a boat storage permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Title IX, "General Regulations", Chapter
101, "Parks, Beaches, and Recreation" , Section 101.35, "Storing
Boats", Subsection 101.35(F), of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as
follows:
(F) The permit fee to be submitted with the
application shall be $1111'9 8300.00. plus applicable
taxes.
Section 2. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed.
, ,
I
Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the day of , 1995.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
First Reading
Second Reading
I
- 2 - Ord. No. 7-95
._,-
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER [If/vi
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i I'" .e . - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
FIRST READING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 8-95/DESIGNATION OF
SOLOMON DAVID SPADY HOUSE AS LOCAL HISTORIC SITE
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
This is first reading for Ordinance No. 8-95 which designates the
Solomon David Spady House located at 170 N.W. 5th Avenue as a local
historic site and adds it to the Local Register of Historic Places.
The property consists of a single family home which was constructed
in 1926 and remains a good example of the Mission Revival style of
architecture as built in Delray Beach in the 1920s. The house is
associated with Delray's most prominent black educator and
community leader from 1923 to 1956, Solomon David Spady, and is an
important landmark to the identity of the community.
The Historic Preservation Board conducted a public hearing on this
matter on December 7, 1994, at which time the Board voted 6 to 0 to
recommend the designation of the Solomon David Spady House as a
local historic site.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 8-95 on first reading. If
passed, a public hearing will be held on February 7, 1995.
~1-0
ref:agmemo17
I I
)
ORDINANCE NO. 8-95
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, DESIGNATING THE SOLOMON DAVID
SPADY HOUSE, LOCATED AT 170 N.W. 5TH AVENUE, AS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AS A LOCAL HISTORIC
SITE; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE II ZONING MAP
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, 1994" TO SHOW THE HISTORIC
DESIGNATION IN AN OVERLAY MANNER; PROVIDING A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach provides for the
designation and protection of historic sites; and
WHEREAS, Douglas T. Williams, as duly authorized agent, has
nominated the property described herein to be designated as a local
historic site; and
WHEREAS, a designation report was prepared concerning the
designation of the property located at 170 N.W. 5th Avenue to the )
Local Register of Historic Places; and
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Board of the City of
Delray Beach held a duly noticed public hearing in regard to the
designation of the property as a local historic site; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 1994, the Historic Preservation
Board of the City of Delray Beach recommended that the property
described herein be designated a local historic site; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has
conducted a duly noticed public hearing in regard to the designation
of the property described herein as a local historic site.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following described property in the
City of Delray Beach, Florida, is hereby designated as a local
historic site in accordance with and under the provisions of Section
4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach,
Florida, to-wit:
The Solomon David Spady House, located at 170 N.W.
5th Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida; more particularly I
described as follows:
1 1
Lots 5 and 6 and the North 26.25 feet of Lot 7,
MELVIN BURD'S SUBDIVISION OF THE N1/2 OF BLOCK 19
SHOWN ON MAP OF TOWN OF LINTON, as recorded in Plat
Book 11 at Page 73 of the Public Records of Palm
Beach County, Florida.
Section 2. That the Planning Director of said City shall,
upon the effective date of this ordinance, amend the Zoning Map of the
City of Delray Beach, Florida, to show the historic designation, in an
overlay manner.
Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 4. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall become effecti Vf>"
immediately upon passage on second and final reading. I
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the day of , 1995.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
First Reading
Second Reading
- 2 - Ord. No. 8-95
-
_I
r II -1~
II. ~ ~t-.. ,......J
..... --I I-- I~: r- -1 r .....J
--' t=-, 1--1-, IL-J ~ _ 1_
l~ I I 1-,......, I--Il _ _ T11- I-
I t--I - 'J t-L.. _. L-- ..!;. I _
r lIT r- ..L, :> Ir--J_ -I~I ~_
I J ~ _ I >---< < _
'- I -.... - r-,. =-' _ Jlll-- . = _
-, II~ ~-, -l --< .. _
- -- . < -
--" =='3 1 I J f-::J~ ~ _ _;::
- - - 1--<1-- - - = J-.-
.~ ~~~ I-- -- -- _ 1=
- f---:: '-- - - = ~ IT- I J L....(
- - ,,/ - - I UJ - ri
= f- - t-L m [[ I J I _I L "'---.r 11-.,
"~ -- -- 'Q "
= ,- rT I ~In [t, L 1 ::. .;. J IT lJ 1=1------1~ . '--
'= 1= LL -I -w'-o == 11'-1 -' IT JJ ----! _ _
-...J -Ill ill 'IT 1_ _J l~c=::I=::::llA I-- I-- _ _ _ '--
1-" 11=1 _ F= _ _
------1~ ~ _ .
'---<~ - - -0- _ -Z r--
~ ~I-- '_
- , f---< "---- · ~~ "_ I-- I-- _ I-- J-
- ~ ._'~ - >-- L
'== ~ = I-- ~.- '0- I-- - -J -lllJ _
- r lL_ ill _ I _ _I
- -rrr I-- rn h-, F J IT --1 - ". -:. - ,r-
I-- - I I I I _ L-L..;" _ _ "I I-
!-It-::::, L I ~L ''''' r ~ 0 I 1_,.. l-
I - mm [[IJ] ---t - r -)t =-- '--
'~ - -. -. -
~8~~ ~ ir=~-'='L 'E;;;OSI -.JO
----, 1 L -- _, [[1JJ1ol
-trl--- I. A T LAN ~ C _ r I ~I =j~
J.. J - _ .... 10 l/.JJJ.j,1 _ I ~
r I~ _ < I ,
h frlT JJ-mmmm __~ J . -== =- _""
I : I 1 lW.lIJ!!!!! _ _ _ ~
-~ I-- ~ ~t
e- - ~= I IL-l
~ - '-- 0-- - I fi _ S1. 1
<~ - -- - - ~ ~ - 0-- - _r nTI1llITl
I-- - r- - t- "--] I-- ....J - -, .ill1J I
f-- ~ - -- I--- _ _ ", _ Iml
I-- t-- I L IL- l-- __ l===l I ----l
- r- t-- --' oc-, r 1 I ~ - -::::: 0-
I c:: 't.= 'In" _ r- ---I -~, ~ .1-
- r I r I ~~ I--- I--- ~ - 1.1= "'-J
h~1 1 --I II-- '- r- -I"''''' _ t-- I r-, -a~ . _ ]
-<. - -' ~ ....=;::... 1- ~ 1--::. >-- ,l_ r-
e- _ ~ I -..--- I- _ _... _ ..
>-- - , .~ . ..
1:1 r- r .- - 5TH AVENUE
crrr or IIO.AA T KIo.O\, ~
I WJ> .n'S7O/'
I -- ~ e4Sl"
-
fA
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: DAVID T. HAR CITY MANAGER
~~G
THRU:
DEPARTMENT OF
FROM: PAT CAYCE~
HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER
SUBJECT: MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 1995
FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE
SOLOMON D. SPADY HOUSE, 170 N.W. 5TH AVENUE, TO THE
LOCAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES.
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
approval on first reading of an ordinance designating a
property as a local historic site.
The property consists of a single family residence
constructed in 1926 and located at 170 N.W. 5th Avenue. The
legal description of the property is Block 19, Lots 5 and 6
and the north 26.25 feet of Lot 7.
B A C K G R 0 U N D:
The building was constructed in 1926, the architect and
principal contractor are unknown. The structure is a good
example of the Mission Revival style of architecture as built in
Delray Beach in the 1920's. It embodies most of the major
features representative of the style and has not been altered to
a major degree.
The Spady House has a high threshold of cultural significance.
It is associated with the 33 year career of Delray's most
prominent black educator and community leader from 1923 to 1956.
It is important to the identity of the neighborhood to recognize
this site and to make the community aware of its existence. It
is appropriate that this building be listed on the Local
Register of Historic Places for it is worthy of the protection
and special consideration afforded by that designation.
The request for designation is being made by Douglas T. Williams
who has power attorney from the owner, Agnes Munnings.
City Commission Documentation
Meeting of January 17, 1995
~~- Designation of a Local Historic Building
Page 2
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Historic Preservation Board formally reviewed the
designation report at its meeting of November 2, 1994 and made
positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(B),(2)(d) & (e) and
4.5.1(B)(2)(d) and (e) and 4.5.1(B)(3)(a) and (b) , Criteria for
Desiqnation of Historic Sites or Districts, and set a date for a
Public Hearing to allow the public to comment on the
designation.
Pursuant to Section 4.5.1(C) Desiqnation Procedures, the Public
Hearing was held on December 7, 1994. The Board voted 6-0 to
recommend that the City Commission approve the ordinance
designating the Spady House as a Local Historic Site.
R E COM MEN D E D ACT ION:
By motion, approve on first reading the ordinance designating
the Solomon D. Spady House, 170 N.W. 5th Avenue (Block 19, Lots
5 and 6 and the north 26.25 feet of Lot 7) to the Local Register
of Historic Places.
Attachment:
* Letter of approval for designation from Douglas T.
Williams.
* Designation Report.
fi1e/y:spady-3
..
. -
TO: Historic Preservation Board DATE: October 18, 1994
Delray Beach
FROM: Douglas T. Williams ~ _ _v...:> .
RE: Historic Designation of the Spady House
The Spady House is rich in the heritage of Delray Beach. It was the home of the first
full-time black teacher/principal of the first "colored" school in Delray Beach. The
Mediterranean-style stucco was among the nicest in the city.
I would like to preserve the character of this building and the history it conveys. I am,
therefore asking the Historical Preservation Board to present this house, 170 N.W. 5
Avenue, Delray Beach, to the city commission for consideration of being designated to
the Local Register as an historical site.
..
,
DES I G N A T ION R E P 0 R T
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
----- --.- -"~..=._~..- II
-.- _.~..-
-.' r-, .' :-.,~.. ,-.. A .."
."~':F'~,):~~'~f,< ~;
~-""t::~:"";:'.-'--'.::: "-.'~
~.~~:;: .r:1
"' .~~,;
",; ':- 4
, i
.
THE SOLOMON DAVID SPADY HOUSE
170 N.W. 5TH AVENUE
CONSTRUCTED 1926
Designation Report
170 N.W. 5th Avenue
Page 2
-~._-
,,-
DESIGNATION REPORT: 170 N.W. 5TH AVENUE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
II. LOCATION MAP
III. ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION
IV. HISTORICAL INFORMATION
V. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES
VII. PHOTOGRAPHY
Report prepared October 1994 by Vera Farrington, Delray ,Beach
Historic Preservation Board Member and Patricia Cayce, Historic
Preservation Planner, City of Delray Beach.
Designation Report
170 N.W. 5th Avenue
pagg- 3
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: 170 N.W. 5th Avenue, Delray
Beach, Palm Beach County,
Florida
Date of Construction: 1926
Architect: Unknown
Builder: Unknown
Present Owner: Douglas T. Williams, 118 N.W.
8th Avenue, Delray Beach FL
33444.
Present Use: Residential
Present Zoning: GC General Commercial
Legal Description: Lots 5 & 6 and the N. 26.25' of
Lot 7, Block 19, Delray Beach,
formerly Town of Linton, Palm
Beach County, Florida
Property Control Number: 12 43 46 16 01 019 0050
Classification for
Designation: Architectural significance,
good example of Mission Revival
style. Cultural Significance,
home of S.D. Spady, prominent
black educator.
.
Designation Report
170 N.W. 5th Avenue
Page 4
II. MAP
lIT] I-- II I I II :~
r f--- ~ II I I II
f-- II J I II
N.W. J'l.::l ST.
.. - ._- r U I 11 LL~. ..---
~ - I--
~ .- ~I-- f---
I-- ~~ "'~ ~< ~-
I-- - <~ f-- - f---
- f-- - I-- - ~
~- - f-- '-- - ,-.--
- f-- f-- - -
'--- - i--- :- - -
:- - -
I ~II t " II Tr IT i-
,-
Now. 2"0 - ST, ~
, J I Ie J -'II I I I -'
II, 0
1/ If I I 2- -
} '"
~' .-
-
r-- -
'- ~ ,- c--- -
T jE -
- co " ... 3i
f-- =.- I------- Z /----
II I T1 ==IT L /----,
I f--
!l.W. L--
~~mm ill1J] ,,, 't .--
~. ~ -1---
~~ g~~iie-e-~=~~~ ~
'--
-
[II .. I I DlIJ] ~
tr
ATLANTIC AVENUE
j.. - L I IlflT ~DJJJ~=
I I
I-- \Ii r.-L- . ~
- t-
i----- ~ < I--- 0(
I---
I-- I--- f-- f-
'$ f-- I--- -
0(_ 10-
~ I---
- I-
-
- - 0
- - - ~ ~
- - !!i
-
-
151 S.w. 151 st.
l--- F II 1111 ;!/I ....
~ I-- I-
'" ~
'"
I--- -
'-- I-- -
- I-- ~
"
[ ~.I 170 . "-- - - - - J
N.W. 5TH AVENUE
a1Y OF llQJU r KAO(, A.
-- /WTW. &4SC ""'" $I'S7DI -
Designation Report
170 N.W. 5th Avenue
Page 5
III. Architectural Information -~_.~-
This building is a good example of the simplified Mission
Revival style which was popular throughout the City in both
commercial and residential buildings during the 1920s. The
Mission style is distinguished by its simplicity of design and
ornamentation. The prominent features of the style include the
following:
Roofs: Predominantly flat roofs concealed with a parapet.
If gables are combined with a flat roof the gables are
covered with terra cotta tiles. The parapets generally are
bell curved with curved elevations at the corners. Roof
scuppers (drain tiles) are set within the parapet walls.
Porches: A front porch is characteristic of the style,
often extending the full length of the facade. Open
balconies are commonly found above the porch on a two story
structure.
Walls: Construction is either hollow clay tile or frame,
finished with rough or smooth stucco.
Windows: Either casement or sash or a combination, usually
multi-paned.
Chimney: Usually project from the wall. Chimney tops
often have bell tower shape.
The Spady House incorporates many of the classic features of the
Mission Revival style. It was constructed about 1925 and was
completed prior to July 1926 as it is included on the July 1926
Sanborn map which is attached. Built as a single family
residence, it is a two story rectangular building of stucco
over frame construction set on a stone foundation. It has a
flat roof concealed by a decorative parapet. Constructed as an 8
room house, it had 4 rooms on each floor and an 8' by 18' porch
across the front facade. The roof of the porch is flat and is
also concealed by a parapet which matches that on the primary
roof. The original window openings remain, though some have been
altered in size to accommodate standard factory built windows.
All of the original sash or casement wood windows have been
replaced with aluminum awning windows. The openings of the
original screen porch have been enclosed with aluminum windows.
The chimney projects from the south facade wall and is capped
wi th a bell tower covering. Drain tile sucppers are set into
the parapet walls.
A 12' x 18' garage was constructed in conjunction with the
house. It was free-standing, probably stucco over frame
construction with a flat roof and Mission parapet. It has been
demolished and replaced with the existing garage.
Designation Report
170 N.W. 5th Avenue
Page 6
-
IV. Historical Information
The street address of the property is 170 N.W. 5th Avenue,
formerly N. Blackmer Street. The property is legally described
as Lots 5, 6 and the N. 26.25 feet of Lot 7, Melvin S. Burd
Subdivision of the North Half of Block 19, Delray Beach,
formerly Town of Linton, Palm Beach County, Florida.
Block 19 was not subdivided into lots when the Town of Linton
was platted in 1895. In September of 1915 Melvin S. Burd, of
Burd's Produce Co., shipper of fruit and vegetables, subdivided
and platted lots on the north half of Block 19 but the
subdivision was not recorded in the Palm Beach County Plat Book
until April, 1925. This would indicate that construction on the
north half of the block did not occur prior to 1925. The Spady
House is located on the west side of N.W. 5th Avenue, a block
and a half from W. Atlantic Avenue.
Solomon David Spady's activities as an educator and black
community leader were of major importance and influence to the
City. Mr. Spady was born in Virginia 1890 and graduated from
Hampton Institute, now Hampton University, in Hampton Virginia.
He was a student of George Washington Carver who became his
mentor and counselor at the Institute. George Washington Carver
was a botanist and a pioneer in the field of agricultural
chemistry who fostered in Spady a lifelong interest in the
subject. Spady was one of the founders of the New Farmers of
America, a national organization which encouraged black people
to become independent farmers.
After graduating from Hampton Institute, Solomon Spady taught
school in Cape Charles Virginia and in 1923 he moved to Delray
to take a teaching position which also carried the
responsibility of principal. He remained in that position for
33 years. The school that Spady became principal of was located
on the east side of N.Blackmer Street (N.W.5th Avenue) between
W. Atlantic Avenue and N.W. 1st Street. This was the site of the
first school in the settlement which was established in 1895 by
the Dade County Board of Instruction and known as Delray Colored
NO. 4. The Town 0 f Delray was part of Dade county until 1909
when Palm Beach County was established. The first school was
little more than a thatched hut, but then so were most of the
early buildings in town, the thatching and dirt floor soon gave
way to a wood roof and floor as the little school grew. In
1916, on the same site, the Palm Beach County Board of
Instruction "constructed a colored school building in the town
of Delray at a cost approximating thirty-five hundred dollars.
This school is in charge of Professor Clarence E. Walker and has
done such a remarkable work that it has attracted the attention
of the trustees of the Slater fund, who very generously have
Designation Report
170 N.W. 5th Avenue
Page 7
been donating five hundred dollars per annum towards the support
of the school. II 1 It is believed that Clarence Walker remained
at the school until his retirement in 1923, when Spady became
its head. Given the excellent reputation of the school, it is
easy to understand why the Palm Beach County school
superintendent was anxious to find an outstanding replacement,
and sheds light on why such a well educated and well connected
teacher would consider a post in a pioneer town with a
population of approximately 2,000 souls.
By 1939 the enrollment had outgrown the "standard frame
schoolhouse" and the out-building classrooms which had been
added. With insufficient property to expand and construct a
larger school, the School Board purchased land at N.W. 4th
Street and N.W. 8th Avenue and built a new school which served
grades 1 through 12. At Mr. Spady's suggestion, this school was
named Carver School in honor of his former mentor. In 1951 the
Board again addressed the need for more class rooms and' the 1939
school was largely demolished and replaced with a new school.
In 1957 black high school students moved to a new building south
of W. Atlantic Avenue and took the name Carver with them. In
1958 the School Board in recognition of one its most illustrious
principals named the school on N.W. 4th Avenue in his honor.
Solomon Spady's wife, Jessie, was also a teacher, she was born
in Florida in 1894. It is believed that the Spadys built the
house at 170 N.W. 5th Avenue, however it may have been built on
speculation in 1925 during the land boom and purchased by them
in 1928.
All of Mr. Spady's energy was dedicated to improving the
educational standards of the segregated school system in which
he taught. He often inspired his students by telling them of
personal encounters with Booker T. Washington and George
Washington Carver. Mr. Spady, with persistence, broad intellect
and a passion to educate had a great influence in setting the
goals and increasing the quality of the schooling available to
blacks, not only in Delray but in the State and County, in the
decades preceding desegregation. The Spady house was a meeting
place for intellectuals and community leaders, and his students
and their parents were always welcome. The fact that he chose
to live only a block from his first school and four blocks from
his second tells us of his total commitment to be identified
with his work and with the involvement of the community he
served.
Solomon David Spady retired in 1956 and returned to live in his
native Virginia.
1- Narrative Reports of County Superintendents, 1916-1918.
State Department of Education, Tallahassee, FL.
Research Report - 55, September, 1967
Designation Report
170 N.W. 5th Avenue
Page 8
V. statement of SignifIcance and Criteria for Designation
Statement of Siqnificance
170 N.w. 5th Avenue is a good example of the Mission Revival
style of architecture as built in Delray Beach in the 1920s. It
embodies most of the major features representative of the style
and has not been altered to a major degree.
Most importantly the Spady House has a high threshold of
cultural significance. It is associated with the 33 year career
of Delray's most prominent black educator and community leader
from 1923 to 1956. It is important to the identity of the
neighborhood to recognize this site and to make the community
aware of its existence. It is appropriate that this building be
listed on the Local Register of Historic Places for it is worthy
of the protection and special consideration afforded by that
designation.
Criteria for Desiqnation
Section 4.5.1(B) of the Land Development Regulations of the City
of Delray Beach outlines the criteria for designating properties
or sites to the Local Register of Historic Places. It suggests
that at least one criteria from paragraphs (2) or (3) must be
met to justify designation. Listed below are the criteria which
relate to this property and justification for designation.
(2) "A building, structure, site, interior, or district will be
deemed to have historical or cultural significance if it meets
one or more of the following criteria:
(a) "Is associated in a significant way with the life or
activities of a major person important in the city, state,
or national history (for example, the homestead of a local
founding family)."
170 N.W. 5th Avenue was the home of Solomon David Spady and
his wife Jessie for more than 30 years. Mr. Spady was the
most respected educator in the community during his tenure
as teacher/principal of the only school for black students
in the City. The house served as focal point for those
interested in in education and community affairs during his
ownership.
(3) "A building, structure, site of district is deemed to have
architectural or aesthetic significance if it fulfills one or
more of the following criteria."
Designation Report
170 N.W. 5th Avenue
Page 9
(a) "Portrays the environment in an era of history
characterized by one or more distinctive architectural
styles."
This house is characteristic of the many Mission Revival
style structures built in the community during the 1920s.
It is appropriate to offer recognition and some protection
to this structure because many of Mission Revival buildings
have been demolished, or have been altered in such a way
that the original style cannot be identified.
(b) "Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an
architectural style period, or method of construction."
The Spady House contains most of the distinguishing
characteristics of the Mission Revival style. It is simple
in design and ornamentation, and has a traditional flat
roof with decorative parapets. The original openings are
intact and the front porch has undergone little change.
The bell shaped chimney cap and parapet sucppers are
existing as is the rough stucco finish of the exterior
walls.
170 N.W. 5th Avenue is worthy of being designated to the Local
Register of Historic Places. It more than fulfills the criteria
for designation as set forth in Section 4.5.1(B), which requires
that only one criteria be met.
j~1 IJ~ II Idl ,
> m ". . l.
i. . i ~ JMilORN FIRE INSURANCE MAP ~1
... - JULY , 1926 El
I
~ N ~
N. W. 2.ttP
. fi3 . I 1&
> > >~:~'
< ~ :ct ~ '-iU
l ~~::, ~
....
. .f'Il'
~ ' ~~
I- ,... 0< b :Eo xI
to I JJ ...... ...
~ q
~ X J) ': . ~ :: ~ · 'a ~
I . ~ .... IAJ L2.Jj
Z . z
z ·
19
J""':"71' '~'D~'"
~ ,.--r-;y;.. r-
~ I.
~ ~ ~,.. I~ ~ ~
~ -~
>-1:
~ l0 l]P: ' ~:;r;-:---) f-
'-<.:JJ. ~ i ... ~ H~
~ ~i 4
~ .,' : 1LI
~;~ ~,I'ifr' G]f; "m
~ I t.illI<; l!Ai q
.. ~:tJ II i
G?lJ ~ Ii [ill; .. "-
tf r~ m rJ ~ Q.
~~ IlJ ~ ~ lUJ
~ tllf" C' D '111
I It,.. '1[1,1 IDZ
fiI ." ~.
S r- liT 1I C '
. . ~
13 ~ 6111" '-'T N.~ CII,'
[i) ~ I.'.. I ~
~ ~
~
~
t' ON ~ " r--D1a:~
~::~~~5 R'",:::! '-ti:illl' " .
'''.'4.11... ...
20 ~
i:J ...~
[!lj ~ '.
r"
~ ~~
fT=-v. c;l')l ~'"
'1a!.J:J ~ ..
~ ft
~ ~ e ,
r11 ... 0~ r
K:fl ;'t II/st
'.-41
- -
-'
~---~~~"....----- - .--... ~~~. ,_~~__c ~.-.~ u._
, '
~--4~_._ -.--...-.... .. ._-~ ~
REAR ELEVATION
.
..
- " , -'
. .
... '.
-'
" .
FIREPLACE AND CHUmEY
DBI_
;:€~ "...: --< - - . .. ..,?,,~.,
~. . .." . . .'1.t~
...."-,.
JQ~i~~~~~~~~t~i~.~.
~- ",
.'.-
NORTH ELEVATION
p--- ...... ---. -
,.-..; '.'
..' - )..;. . -'-.
f'~/'''
.;..j;
~., ~.....--
~
fl-- ~
'... -=-
-'~ - -
-, ---
~
-
..~ ---- - -- -- ._----
._.- --
SOUTH ELEVATION
Designation Report
170 N.W. 5th Avenue
Page 10
~- ,-
VI. Bibliography and Sources
Delray Beach Design Guidelines, Delray Beach Historic
Preservation Board, 1990
Resourceful Rehab, Metropolitan Dade County, Division of
Historic Preservation, 1987
Narrative Reports of County Superintendents, 1916-1918.
State Department of Education, Tallahassee, FL.
Research Report - 55, September, 1967
Sun Sentinel, February 22, 1992
Delray Beach Historical Society Archives
City Building Cards
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, 1926
Oral History Documentation
Ruth and Spencer Pompey
file/y:spadyz
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGERt0Vv{
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i I~ . /). - MEETING OF JANUARY 17. 1995
FIRST READING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 9-95/DESIGNATION OF SUSAN
WILLIAMS HOUSE AS LOCAL HISTORIC SITE
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1995
This is first reading for Ordinance No. 9-95 which designates the
Susan Williams House located at 30 N.W. 3rd Avenue as a local
historic site and adds it to the Local Register of Historic Places.
The property consists of a single family home which was constructed
in 1935 and remains a good example of the Bungalow style of
architecture which was popular in Delray from the 1920s until the
advent of World War II. The house is associated with Susan
Williams, one of the City's early midwives, and is the only
remaining building in Delray Beach to physically link the social
and cultural history of the pioneer midwives to the community.
The Historic Preservation Board conducted a public hearing on this
matter on December 7, 1994, at which time the Board voted 6 to 0 to
recommend the designation of the Susan Williams House as a local
historic site.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 9-95 on first reading. If
passed, a public hearing will be held on February 7, 1995.
fJ~ 6-0
ref:agmemo16
, \
I
ORDINANCE NO. 9-95
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
OELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, DESIGNATING THE SUSAN WILLIAMS
HOUSE, LOCATED AT 30 N.W. 3RD AVENUE, AS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AS A LOCAL HISTORIC
SITE; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE "ZONING MAP
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, 199411 TO SHOW THE HISTORIC
DESIGNATION IN AN OVERLAY MANNER; PROVIDING A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 4. 5 . 1 of the Land Development Regulations
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach provides for the
designation and protection of historic sites; and
WHEREAS, Douglas T. Williams, as duly authorized agent, has
nominated the property described herein to be designated as a local
historic site; and
WHEREAS. a designation report was prepared concerning the
designation of the property located at 30 N.W. 3rd Avenue to the Local I
Register of Historic Places; and
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Board of the City of
Delray Beach held a duly noticed public hearing in regard to the
designation of the property as a local historic site; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 1994, the Historic Preservation
Board of the City of Delray Beach recommended that the property
described herein be designated a local historic site; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has
conducted a duly noticed public hearing in regard to the designation
of the property described herein as a local historic site.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF TH~
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following described property in the
City of Delray Beach, Florida, is hereby designated as a local
historic site in accordance with and under the provisions of Section
4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach,
Florida, to-wit:
The Susan Williams House, located at 30 N.W. 3rd
Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida; more particularly
described as follows:
1
, I
I
I
Lots 5 and 6, REVISED PLAT OF BLOCK 36, TOWN OF
DELRAY, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page 191 of the
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.
Section 2. That the Planning Director of said City shall,
upon the effective date of this ordinance, amend the Zoning Map of the
City of Delray Beach, Florida, to show the historic designation, in an
overlay manner.
Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 4. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage on second and final reading. -
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the day of , 1995.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
First Reading
Second Reading
- 2 - Ord. No. 9-95
I
.
I
~~-
I
--. - ----
II. MAP
.- .- ...--." . .
I 10- LlL I
I ~ - tj- ~
i--- ~- I--
I--- ~ - - I--
~~ - - -
i--- - - - -
-
- - -
~ m
- -
~ ~ " II 1T T
210 S. N.L 2M
1 I 0
ie: I I ~ ~
....
- =>
- Ix -
~ Z .
- I!!i
- "'- .. )0
- r- - z CIty
- HAlL >
n - IT L ...
- T
No.. 1ST ST. N. . 1ST
I I ~ ...J
~
-i - 01.0
- ~ .~ ~- ~
'1---' .- SOiOOl )
_ z ~z z SQUA."l!
-. - ~
=
=. -
II []]]] nmfunn .= DID IT
ATLANTIC AVENUE
L I r--mn: POlICX SOUlH ~[[]]]mn lllIm~[
I-- . OEPAIlNOiT COUMlY
- tj ~. s
- COURT
- cl-- HOUS(
- ~ -~~
-
- - "-
- I-- '--
I--.
- - -
--
- ~ Z_._
--
-
I-- ,..-- ~ - 1 f -
I-- .-
~.... . 1ST nrr rITr .. ~L .s>
I-- i! I I [ill] =
i! ..
.. -
~ -
l- I--
- I--- -
- - )0 I--
- ~
IT ~t ~H Ii ~
m ..; II II IIIIT ~
'-- l-
t N I ]
~ 30 N.W. 3RD AVENUE
~.._ Ol7A1lllUft
cr.r fIT llC:AA' H.<Ol. '" .
-- DC":"Aol _ .."., Jn7DI -
elf
t:u1
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION --
TO: ~T. HAR EN, C~TY MANAGER
.AL ~
THRU: DANE DOMIN UEZ, DIR TOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIN A ONING
FROM: PAT CAYCE~~
HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER
SUBJECT: MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 1995
FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE
SUSAN WILLIAMS HOUSE, 30 N.W. 3RD AVENUE, TO THE
LOCAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES.
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
approval on first reading of an ordinance designating a
property as a local historic site.
The property consists of a single family residence
constructed in 1935 and located at 30 N.W. 3rd Avenue. The
legal description of the property is Block 36, Lots 5 and 6.
B A C K G R 0 U N D:
The building was constructed in 1935, the architect is unknown.
The builder was Isaiah Bruin a well known contractor who built a
variety of residential structures in the City during the 1920s
and 1930s. The building is a good example of the Bungalow style
of architecture which was popular throughout Delray from the
1920s until the advent of WWII. The building retains most of its
original architecturally defining elements, including the
multi-gabled roof, the prominent front porch and massive porch
piers, most of the original multi-paned windows are existing.
As the home of Susan Williams, one of the City's early midwives,
the house has considerable cultural significance. Mrs Williams's
original homesite was located at the southwest corner of S. W.
4th street and S.W. 4th Avenue, after its demolition she moved
to the subject property which was owned by her daughter Agnes
Munnings and her husband Cleveland. Though she only resided
in the house during the last four year of her life, it is the
only remaining building in the City to physically link the
social and cultural history of the pioneer midwives to the
community.
It is important to the identity of the neighborhood to recognize
this site and to make the community aware of its existence. It
is appropriate that this building be listed on the Local
Register of Historic Places for it is worthy of the protection
and special consideration afforded by that designation.
The request for designation is being made by Douglas T. Williams
who has power attorney from the owner, Agnes Munnings.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Historic Preservation Board formally reviewed the
designation report at its meeting of November 2, 1994 and made
positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(B),(2)(d) & (e) and
and 4.S.1(B)(3)(a) and (b), Criteria for Designation of Historic
Sites or Districts, and set a date for a Public Hearing to allow
the public to comment on the designation.
Pursuant to Section 4.5.1(C) Desiqnation Procedures, the Public
Hearing was held on December 7, 1994. The Board voted 6-0 to
recommend that the City Commission approve the ordinance
designating the Susan Williams House as a Local Historic Site.
R E COM MEN D E D ACT ION:
By motion, approve on first reading the ordinance designating
the Susan Williams House, 30 N.W. 3rd Avenue (Block 36, Lots 5
and 6) to the Local Register of Historic Places.
Attachments:
* Letter of approval for designation from Douglas T.
Williams.
* Designation Report.
.
file/y:munnings
~-""'!:---
- --"-- --- ----
MEMORANDUM --
TO: Historic Preservation Board DATE: October 18, 1994
Delray Beach
FROM: Douglas T. Williams ,--- -
--:. , _ '-"J .
RE: Historic Designation of the Munnings House
I do feel that the Munnings house on northwest third avenue meets the requirements to
be designated an Historical Site. The American Bungalow meets the design guidelines
that are set forth by the city. . The history of the house (which, at on&,Jime, was the
home of the city's only mid-wife) is certainly noteworthy. I have been a resident of
Delray Beach for most of my life and have experienced and been a part of the many
changes that have occurred. I do realize the importance of preserving the rich, cultural,
historical heritage in all sectors of the city.
I am, therefore asking that the Historical Preservation Board present this house, which
is located 30 N.W. 3 Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida, to the city commission for
consideration of being designated to the Local Register as an historic site.
.
~ ~--
DRAFI -.-
DES I G N A T ION R E P 0 R T
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
/
/
/
/
, /
~ 7::. i.::~::'-f:~~:'_:\'(:- ~~-
THE SUSAN WILLIAMS HOUSE
30 N.W 3RD AVENUE
CONSTRUCTED 1935
..
Designation Report
30 N.W. 3rd Avenue
Page 2 -::="" ~."'"
DESIGNATION REPORT: 30 N.W. 3RD AVENUE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
II. LOCATION MAP
III. ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION
IV. HISTORICAL INFORMATION
V. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES
VII. PHOTOGRAPHY
Report prepared October 1994 by Vera Farrington, Delray Beach
Historic Preservation Board Member and Patricia Cayce, Historic
Preservation Planner, City of Delray Beach.
.
Designation Report
30 N.W. 3rd Avenue
Page 3
----- -~.._-
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: 30 N.W. 3rd Avenue, Delray
Beach, Palm Beach County,
Florida
Date of Construction: 1935
Architect: Unknown
Builder: Isaiah Bruin, originally from
Quincy, Florida
Present Owner: Douglas T. Williams, 118 N.W.
8th Avenue, Delray Beach FL
33444.
Present Use: Residential, single family
Present Zoning: R-1A, Single Family Residential
Legal Description: Lots 5 & 6 of Block 36, Town of
Delray, originally Town of
Linton
Property Control Number: 12-43-46-16-01-036-0050
Classification for
Designation: Architectural significance,
good example of bungalow style.
Cultural Significance, home of
one of the first midwives in
the community.
.
Designation Report
30 N,W, 3rd Avenue
Page 4 ~-;:::~
---
--------
II. MAP
C I-- UL ~~ I
~- .1- ~ f--- W ki
-< f< -< r'
f.-- -
f--- - I-- -
t:J~ - I-- -
-
- - I-- - -
- - I-- -
f-- ~ - [jtj
~ .- II 11 nT T
~
. - 2ND ST. N.E. 2N
- ~ I I 0
z
ie I I N IS
w
I---
- I,r= I--- :J
l: - F ~ z
r-
I-- 10_ '--- ... )0
- lIT I- 'i CIN
- HALL >
n - L d
- I
lur. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST
I I U W t-..(
I I ~
~i - 0\.1) f--
f-- ~ ~ ;il--
f-- i- ~ z 'il-- . SCHOOL f--
r:= f--- . ' 1...- SQUAll::
I-
-
= f-- I---
ITIilll u n,""" tIT~
,Ill OJ]] mr S1AOIUY OJ]]
ATLANTIC AVENUE
.L. 111111 POLICE SOUlH ~[]]]illJJ [I]]]] ~[[[
- f--- ~ ~. ~ DEPAAll.IOn ~ COUN1't ~ .---- ~ r--- r
COUR1
- ~ '--- ~ HOUSE ~~~II
I--- I--
- - ~ I--
I--- ,...,~ t--
~ f--- -
~ f-~
'--
I-- I-- ~ I--
I-- f--- ~ . Z L---- .1-
I-- I-- N ~ ;=TI~
I-- f--- ~
s..'~ . 1ST Sl. VI S.E. 1ST
- (i I J 111111111 DJIill =
j!: .
10 ~
- f--
f---
- I--- f--
- ~ ~
- - ~
iii -
~=r ~~ 30 .--
-
I - ,~ IT 1 I I I
I- -
-
[ N I ]
~ 30 N,W. 3RD AVENUE
r"...A.t.I<~ t)(Jl'UlWC.H't
~ or DC.JU r 8tAOl. A. -
-- CFZC'-'J. 8'~ UI.I' =rD/ --
......... YA!I --
Designation Report
30 N.W. 3rd Avenue
Page 5
--- -._- ----~-_....__.
III. Architectural Information
The house at 30 N.W. 3rd Avenue is a good example of the South
Florida bungalow style as built in Delray Beach during the 1920s
and 30s. Many of these homes were built from pre-designed plans
purchased from publications such as the Home OWners Service
Institute catalog and the AlA sponsored Architects Small House
Service Bureau, or from local lumber companies. But whether
designed by an architect, or constructed by local builders from
pre-designed plans, they all share the basic design elements of
the bungalow.
Walls: Horizontal wood or stucco exterior facing.
Roof: Low pitched gable roof with the ridge either
perpendicular or parallel to the street; often with
multiple gables. If the primary ridge is perpendicular to
the street, the front porch is usually roofed with a
separate offset gable. Roofs often have exposed rafter
tails.
Porch: Porches are prominent. They are usually deep and
extend the full width of the facade. The porch roof is
supported by piers. The design of the pier supports is
usually unique to the house and varies depending on the
creativity of the builder.
Windows: Double hung or casement, multi-paned and arranged
for cross ventilation
Plan: Usually rectangular and often modest in scale.
The Williams House contains many of the classic bungalow
features. There are two gables at right angles to the street
and an opposing gable roof covering the front porch. The porch
roof is supported by 2 traditional massive piers which are
broken at the middle with a molded cap. Above the cap the piers
taper gradually to the porch roof's supporting beam. Exposed
rafters are visible throughout. Original casement windows with
a 4 over 1 pane configurations are a feature of the front facade
adj'oining the porch. All of the original multi-paned windows
are in place and most of the functioning wood shutters are
existing. The house originally had wood siding and possibly a
wood shingle trim. However, the facing has been covered with
vinyl siding so it is not possible on visual inspection to
determine what style of wood siding was used. The house has a
composite shingle roof. The foundation is a combination of pier
and cement block.
..
.
Designation Report
30 N.W. 3rd Avenue
Page 6 --;::-:- '"';;:----
------ -
IV. Historical Information
The house is located on Lots 5 & 6 of Block 36. This block was
subdivided into 16 lots when the Town of Linton was platted in
1895. In 1913 the block was replatted by the owners, J.H.
Jackson and W.H. Brady; 39 smaller lots were created out of the
original 16. Lots 5 and 6, and most of the replatted lots were
purchased by George H. Green and his wife and the balance were
owned by W.H. Brady and his wife. By 1922 there were 14
structures on the block including the Primitive Baptist Church
on the northeast corner, and two grocery stores fronting on W.
Atlantic Avenue. When the Town of Linton was platted all of the
streets had names, the change from names to numbers was adopted
in 1924. The streets which bounded Block 36 were as follows: on
the east, N. Beatty Street (N.W. 3rd Avenue) ; on the west N.
Larson Street (N.W. 4th Avenue) ; to the north, Miller Street
(N.W. 1st street).
Though the historic house was not owned by Susan Williams, she
resided there during the last 4 years of her life. The property
will be listed on the Local Register as the Susan Williams
House.
Susan Currie Williams was born in the Bahamas in 1870. In about
1898 she and her husband and their small daughter Agnes, boarded
the Sir Charles Orr and set sail for their new life in the Town
of Delray. Susan Williams had been trained as a midwife in the
Bahamas and it is possible that she had been asked to come here
by the Bahamian settlers who had established themselves in the
community. Her services were soon in demand, both as a midwife
and general nurse practitioner. The town did not have a resident
doctor until J.R. Cason set up practice in 1905, ten years after
the first settlers arrived. Medical facilities were available in
West Palm Beach but one had to travel by train (Florida East
Coast Railroad) to get there. A competent and caring midwife
was essential to the community, as babies did not time their
arrivals to conform to train schedules. Nurse "Susie" Williams
delivered black and whi te babi~s alike and gave other medical
attention as needed. As medical facilities became available and
doctors moved to the City, Susan was called upon by the medical
profession for home nursing. Tall, slender and imposing in her
white uniform and dark cloak, she is remembered even today, by
those who recall seeing her striding purposefully along with her
black medical bag in hand.
The original Williams homesite, now demolished, was located at
the southwest corner of S. W. 4th Street and S.W. 4th Avenue.
Susan William's daughter, Agnes, mar:r::ied Grover Cleveland
Munnings in 1924. Mr and Mrs Munnings purchased Lots 5 & 6 and
built the bungalow in 1935. At the age of 80 Susan Williams
suffered a stroke and moved 30 N.W. 3rd Avenue to be with her
daughter and son-in-law. After a long and distinguished career
in public service Susan Williams died 4 years later in 1954 at..
the age of 84.
Designation Report
30 N.W. 3rd Avenue
Page 7 ...".-
----
V. Statement of Siqnificance and Criteria for Desiqnation
statement of Significance
The house at 30 N.W. 3rd Avenue, also known as the Susan
Williams House, is a good example of a modest residential
bungalow as built in Delray Beach during the 1920s and 30s. The
house presents the major physical elements typical of bungalow
construction. With the exception of the vinyl siding which has
been installed over the original wood siding, most of the
bungalow's defining character remains in tact. Additionally, for
the last 4 years of her life, the bungalow was the home of Susan
Williams one of Delray Beach's first midwives. It should be
noted that the original Williams homesite has been demolished,
as have many significant buildings in the historic black
community. It is appropriate that this building be listed on
the Local Register of Historic Places for it is worthy of the
protection and special consideration afforded by that
designation.
Criteria for Designation
Section 4.5.1(B) of the Land Development Regulations of the City
of Delray Beach outlines the criteria for designating properties
or sites to the Local Register of Historic Places. It suggests
that at least one criteria from paragraphs (2) or ( 3 ) must be
met to justify designation. Listed below are the criteria which
relate to this property and justification for designation.
( 2 ) "A building, structure, site, interior, or district will be
deemed to have historical or cultural significance if it meets
one or more of the following criteria:
(a) "Is associated in a significant way with the life or
activities of a major person important in the city, state,
or national history (for example, the homestead of a local
founding family)."
The house at 30 N.W. 3rd Avenue was the home of Susan
Williams, one of the first midwives in the City,. from
1950 until her death in 1954. For 10 years after the first
settlers arrived 1895 the community had no doctor, the
nearest medical assistance was in West Palm Beach. The
presence of a competent midwife was not only significant
but essential to both the black and.white citizens of the
community. Because the original Susan Williams homesite has
been demolished, it is appropriate to recognize the house
she occupied during the last years of her life.
.
Designation Report
30 N.W. 3rd Avenue
""Pal1e 8
( 3 ) "A bui lding, structure, site of district is deemed~--o-ha v e
architectural or aesthetic significance if it fulfills one or
more of the following criteria."
(a) "Portrays the environment in an era of history
characterized by one or more distinctive architectural
styles."
This house is characteristic of the many modest bungalows
built in the community during the 1920s and 30s. It is
appropriate to offer recognition and some protection to
this structure because many of the early bungalows have
been demolished, or ha ve been altered in such a way that
the original style cannot be identified.
(b) "Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an
architectural style period, or method of construction."
The Susan Williams house contains most of the
distinguishing characteristics of the bungalow style. It
has a double gabled roof with an opposing gable over the
porch roof. Exposed rafter tails are used throughout the
roof construction. The front porch is prominent and its
roof is supported with massive piers. The plan of the
house is rectangular and the multi-paned windows are massed
for cross ventilation.
30 N.W. 3rd Avenue is worthy of being designated to the Local
Register of Historic Places. It more than fulfills the criteria
for designation as set forth in Section 4.5.1(B), which requires
that only one criteria be met.
.
Designation Report
30 N.W. 3rd Avenue
Page 9 .-::-:- ~-
-------
--~-
VI. Biblioqraphy and Sources
Delray Beach Desiqn Guidelines, Delray Beach Historic
Preservation Board, 1990
Resourceful Rehab, Metropolitan Dade County, Division of
Historic Preservation, 1987
City Building Cards
Property Assessors Records, 1913
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, 1926 & 1941.
Oral History Documentation:
Douglas Williams, Grandson
Agnes Munnings, Daughter
.
"
-
---
--
,
.. -
-
~
'-'
-
~ ::-
- -
l'
-- .. .' [~.
-- -,
.
~.~
'1
~
~ !.J
. \ ,
1 . .
-. - - 'SI'lt... .
---
.
~~.=-
.