Agenda Reg 10-02-01Tuesday, October 2, 2001
Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.
Public Hearing8 7:00 p.m.
Commission Chambers
Delray Beach City Hall
100 NW 1st Avenue
Del~ay Beach, Florida 33444
Phone: (561) 243-7000
Fax: (561) 243-3774
RULES FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
1. PUBLIC COMMENT: The public is encouraged to offer comments with the
order of presentation being as follows: City Staff, public comments, Commission
discussion and official action. City Commission meetings are business meetings
and the right to limit discussion rests with the Commission. Generally, remarks
by an individual will be limited to three minutes or less. The Mayor or
presiding officer has discretion to adjust the amount of time allocated.
A. Public Hearings: Any citizen is entitled to speak on items under this
section.
Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items from the Public: Any citizen
is entitled to be heard concerning any matter within the scope of
jurisdiction of the Commission under this section. The Commission may
withhold comment or direct the City Manager to take action on requests or
comments.
Ce
Regular Agenda and First Reading Items: When extraordinary
circumstances or reasons exist and at the discretion of the Commission,
citizens may speak on any official agenda item under these sections.
2. SION IN SHEET: Prior to the start of the Commission Meeting, individuals
wishing to address public hearing or non-agendaed items should sign in on the
sheet located on the right side of the dais. If you are not able to do so prior to the
start of the meeting, you may still address the Commission on an appropriate item.
The primary purpose of the sign-in sheet is to assist staff with record keeping.
Therefore, when you come up to the podium to speak, please complete the sign-in
sheet if you have not already done so.
3. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION: At the appropriate time, please step up to
the podium and state your name and address for the record. All comments must
be addressed to the Commission as a body and not to individuals. Any person
making impertinent or slanderous remarks or who becomes boisterous while
addressing the Commission shall be barred by the presiding officer from speaking
further, unless permission to continue or again address the Commission is granted
by a majority vote of the Commission members present.
APPELLATE PROCEDURES
Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City
Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, such person
will need to ensure that a verbatim record includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal is based. The City neither provides nor prepares such
record.
The City will furmsh auxiliary rods and services to afford an individual with a
disability an opportumty to participate tn and enjoy the benefits of a service,
program, or activity conducted by the City. Contact Doug Randolph at 243-
7127 (voice) or 243-7199 (TDD), 24 hours prior to the event in order for the
Cxty to accommodate your request. Adapttve hstentng devices are available for
meetines in the Comrmssmn Chambers.
2.
3.
4.
5.
ROI.I. CAI .1..
INVOCATION.
PLEDGE OF P,!,l JEGIANCE TO THE FLAG.
AGENDA APPROVAL.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
· September 19, 2001
PROCI.,AMATIONS:
Recognizing and commending the Ocean Rescue Lifeguard Competition Team on
their achievements at the 2001 United States Lifesaving Association National
Championships.
Recognizing and commending the Ocean Rescue Junior Lifeguard Competition
Team on their achievements at the 2001 United States Lifesaving Association Junior
Lifeguard National Championships.
C. Proclaiming October 2001 as "UNITED WE STAND MONTH"
PRESENTATIONS: None
CONSENT AGENDA: City Manager Recommends Approval.
FINAL PLAT/CARLSON-BLACK: Approve the final plat for Carlson Bhck, a two
lot subdivision with an office building proposed on Lot 1 and a hotel proposed on Lot
2. The property is located on the south side of West Atlantic Avenue east of Whatley
Road.
Bo
FINAL PLAT/PA.RI{SIDE TQWNHOME$ OF DELRAY: Approve the final plat
for Parkside Townhomes of Delray, the project consists of 165 garden apaxtments and
is located north of West Atlantic Avenue and west of Coral Trace Boulevard.
Co
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH AND THE DELRAY BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY
ASSOCIATION; INC,: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement between the
City of Delray Beach and Delray Beach Public Library Association, Inc. delineating the
Association shall be solely responsible for the design and construction of the new
library and selection of design professionals and contractors.
Do
.RATIFICATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD ACTIONS; Ratify the various actions
approved by the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board at
the Quarterly Annual Meeting of September 19, 2001.
-2-
10-02-01
J0
CONTRACT RENEWAL/LANGTON ASSOCIATES; Approve extension of the
Consulting Agreement between the City of Delray Beach and Langton Associates for a
period of one year at a fee of $62,500.00.
MUNICIPAL TAX CONSULTING AND MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT;
Approve an agreement with Municipal Tax Consulting and Management to recover
sales taxes that may have been paid to vendors. This is a contingency fee contract from a
"sole source" vendor with a cost of 33.33% of total funds recovered. If no funds are
recovered, than there is no charge for services.
LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
BUCKEY DENT BASEB/tI.I. SCHOOL, INC.. AND TOUSSAINT
L'OLIVENTURE HIGH SCHOOL FOR ART AND SOCIAL JUSTICE:
Approve the license agreement between the City, the Buckey Dent Baseball School,
Inc., and Toussaint L'Ouventure High School for Art and Social Justice for temporary
use of the baseball school's facilities from October 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001.
CONTRACT ADDITION/ROSSO PAVING & DRAINAGE: Approve contract
addition to contract for Rosso Paving & Drainage in the total amount of $56,186.70 for
the construction of a parking lot on Gleason Street across from the First Presbyterian
Church ($30,501.00) and at the Environmental Services complex ($25,685.70). Funding
is available from 115-000-248-01.00 (Parking in lieu of fee) for $30,501.00 and 442-
5178-536-63.90 (Other Improvements) for $25,685.70.
SERVICE AUTHORIZATION #$/CH2M HILL (ANION EXCHANGE
TREATMENT): Approve Service Authorization #5 with CH2M Hill in the amount
of $107,127.00 for professional engineering services for pilot testing and preliminary
design of the Anion Exchange Treatment System at the Water Treatment Plant.
Funding is available from 442-5178-536-63.87 (Anion Exchange Project).
CONTRACT AWARD/EIM¢O PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY:
Approve a contract award to Eimco Process Equipment Company (sole source
provider) in the amount of $51,510.00 for the rehabilitation of Clarifier No. 4 at the
Water Treatment Plant. Funding is available from 442-5178-536-64.90 (R&R-Other
Machinery & Equipment).
DELRAY BEACH RENAISSANCE PROGRAM SUBSIDY: Approve fund
subsidies for five (5) eligible applicants/families in the amount of $19,500 for SW 84
Avenue, $18,000 for SW 3~ Avenue, $19,238 for SW 64 Avenue, $15,000 for SW 134
Avenue, and $15,000 for SW 134 Avenue. This represents 130-homeowner assistance
under Renaissance Program. Funding is available from 118-1924-554-83.01 (SHIP
Program).
RESOLUTION NO. 60-01: Approve Resolution No. 60-01 assessing costs for action
necessary to abate nuisances on thirteen (13) properties throughout the City.
RESOLUTION NO. 61-01: Approve Resolution No. 61-01 assessing costs for action
necessary for the emergency board-up of an unsafe structure located at 1331 NW 3'a
Street.
-3-
10-02-01
REVIEW OF APPEAI. AdiLE LAND DEVELOPMENT BOARD ACTIONS;
Accept the actions and decisions made by the Land Development Boards for the period
September 14, 2001 through September 28, 2001.
O. AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS:
Bid award in the mount of $758,382.00 to Insituform Technologies for trenchless
sanitary sewer rehabilitation utilizing the existing Manatee County contract unit
prices. Funding is available from 442-5178-536-63.51 (Sewer Mains).
Purchase award in the amount of $21,293.00 to Electric Motors of Palm Beach for
two (2) variable frequency drive units for replacement at Miller Park and the South
Pump Station. Funding is available from 441-5143-536-64.90 (Other
Machinery/Equipment).
Approve a lease agreement for an annual cost of $38,541.12 with Enterprise Rent-
A-Car to support undercover operations by the Police Depaxmient's Vice,
Intelligence and Narcotics (VIN) Unit. Funding is available from 001-2115-521-
44.40 (Vehicle Rental/Lease).
Contract renewal of various film and photographic supplies to Focus Camera at an
estimated annual cost of $17,216.59 via the City of Boca Raton Bid #98-110.
Funding is available from various depamnents' FY 2001-2002 operating budgets.
Purchase award to Special Products Group for the purchase of uniforms for the
Police Department at an estimated annual cost of $67,710.25. Funding is available
from all divisions 52.22 (Uniforms/Linen Service) line items in the FY 2001-2002
budget.
REGULAR AGENDA:
RECONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF THE SITE PLAN REVIEW AND
APPEARANCE BOARD ACTION: Reconsider an appeal of the Site Plan Review
and Appearance Board decision regarding approval of a Class V Site Development Plan,
Landscape Plan and Elevations associated with the Hotel Vista Del Mar, located
approximately 300 feet south of Atlantic Avenue on the west side of Ocean Boulevard,
(State Road A-l-A). Ouasi-Judicial Hearing_
BID AWARD TO HAVERLAND BLACKROCK CaRP - SPORTS TURF ONE
(ATLANTIC HIGH SCHOOL MULTI-PURPOSE FIELD): Consider approval
of a contract award to second lowest bidder, Haverland Blackrock Carp - Sports Turf One
in the amount of $47,760.00 for the Atlantic High School multi-purpose field. Funding
is available from 001-4131~572-34.90 (R&R Other Contractual Services).
SPECIAL EVENT REOUEST FOR UNITY WALK: Consider approval of a
request to endorse the Dekay Beach Unity Walk scheduled to be held on November 11,
2001 from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., sponsored by Community Chat. Requested is staff
assistance for security, traffic control, barricading, and trash removal and clean up,
signage and use of the Tennis Stadium, also requested is to waive all fees and overtime
costs.
10-02-01
-4-
10.
11.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
ORDINANCE NO. 54-01 (FIRST READING/FIRST PUBLIC HEARING): An
ordinance amending Land Development Regulation Section 4.4.2802)) and 4.4.13(I2))
and (I) to allow multi-family dwelling units at the density greater than thirty (30) units
per acre, as a conditional use in the CBD-RC (Central Business District - Railroad
Corridor) zoning district, between NE 2"a Street and NE 3~d Street. If passed, a second
public heating will be scheduled for October 16, 2001.
Bo
ORDINANCE NO. $1-01 (SECOND AND FINAL READING); An ordinance
annexing into the City the Fanelli property located on the east side of Military Trail,
north of Atlantic Avenue (mediately east of the Boys Farmers Market) and
establishing initial zoning of GC (General Commercial) for the property. Quasi-
judicial (as to zoning) Public Hearing
ORDINANCE NO. 27-01 (ADOPTION HEARING FOR COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-1):
1. One (1) Future Land Use Map amendment (Faneili Annexation).
2. Update of the Potential Residential Units Map & Table, appearing in both
Future Land Use and Housing Element.
3. General update of the Public Facilities Element.
4. Update of the Comprehensive Plan Map Series to reflect current municipal
boundaries.
ORDINANCE NO, 53-01 (FIRST READING/FIRST PUBLIC HEARING]: An
ordinance amending Land Development Regulations Section 4.4.9(D) (Conditional
Uses and Structures Allowed), Section 4.4.9(F)(2) (West Adantic Avenue Overlay
District Standards), and Section 4.4.9(G)(1) (West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District
Supplemental District Regulations), for the GC (General Commercial) Zone District,
relating to recommendations in the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan. If
passed, a second public hearing will be scheduled for October 16, 2001.
E0
ORDINANCE NO. 52-01 (FIRST READING/TRANSMITTAL HEARING
FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-3); Consider on ~st
reading an ordinance adopting Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-3 which includes
creation of a new Public Schools Facilities element, which will include a definition
section and related map series, and revision to the existing Capital Improvement
Element to include the School Districts adopted Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan.
(Pursuant of Florida Statute 163.3187(1)0), this amendment is exempt from the twice a
year Comprehensive Plan amendment imposed by Florida Statute).
COMMENTS AND INQUIRIES ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS FROM THE
PUBLIC- IMMEDIATELY FOIJLOWING PUBLIC HEARINGS.
City Manager's response to prior public comments and inquiries.
From the Public.
-5-
10-02-01
12.
13.
FIRST READINGS:
ORDINANCE NO. 55-01: An ordinance rezoning from R-1-A (Single Family
Residential) to CF (Community Facilities) to accommodate an off-street parking lot for
Donnie's Golden Spoon Restaurant located on the east side of NW 6m Avenue,
approximately 300 feet north of West Atlantic Avenue. If passed, a quasi judicial
public heating will be scheduled for October 16, 2001.
ORDINANCE NO. 56-01: An ordinance amending Land Development Regulations
Section 4.3.3(00 regarding the defm/tion of Guest Cottages, pursuant to Section
2.4.5(M). If passed, a public hearing will be scheduled for October 16, 2001.
ORDINANCE NO. 57-01: An ordinance amending Chapter 101 (Municipal Parks,
Beach and Other Recreational Sites), by amending Section 101.27 (Animal Regulations)
to allow for animals on the sidewalk and grassy area west of the dune line on the east-
side of A-1-A. If passed, a public heating will be scheduled for October 16, 2001.
COMMENTS AND INQUIRIES ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS.
A. City Manager
B. City Attorney
C. City Commission
10-02-01
SEPTEMBER 19~ 2001
A Regular Meeting of the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida
was called to order by Mayor David Schmidt in the Commission Chambers at City Hall at 6:00
p.m., Tuesday, September 19, 2001.
1_. Roll call showed:
Present-
Commissioner Patricia Archer
Commissioner Jon Levinson
Commissioner Alberta McCarthy
Commissioner Jeff Perlman
Mayor David Schmidt
Absent -
None
Also present were -
Assistant City Manager Robert A. Barcinski
City Manager David T. Harden
City Attorney Susan A. Ruby
City Clerk Barbara Garito
2. INVOCATION.
Reverend Matthew "Bump" Mitchell with Christ Missionary Baptist Church
delivered the opening prayer.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America was given.
4~
AGENDA APPROVAL.
Mayor Schmidt noted the addition of Item 6.C., National Race Equali .ty Day -
September 19~ 2001 to the Proclamations by addendum.
Also, Mayor Schmidt noted the addition of Item 8.G.l., Awards of Bids and
Contracts and Item 8.H. Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement with CRA for
Planning and other Services~ and Interlocal Agreement with CRA for West Atlantic
Redevelopment Coalition~ Inc. to the Consent Agenda by addendum.
Mr. Perlman moved to approve the agenda as amended, seconded by Ms.
McCarthy. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer -
Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes. Said motion passed with
a 5 to 0 vote.
-1-
09/19/01
5_. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
With regard to a comment in the second from the last paragraph on page 17 of the
minutes, Mrs. Archer noted a correction to her statement. Mrs. Archer stated the correct
statement should read that "Mrs. Archer stated she did understand that there was no setback and
that there was a height of 48 feet in the commercial area downtown along Atlantic Avenue, but
not along the beach. Mrs. Archer stated she also said "that it was not the intent of the City to
allow the possibility of a 48-foot high wall of construction along our beach."
The City Attorney stated in the second paragraph on page 8 instead of it stating
"Mr. Dorling stated the Commission approved three waivers" it should read that "Mr. Dorling
stated the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board (SPRAB) approved three waivers."
Mayor Schmidt noted a typographical error on page 16 of the minutes. The word
"midigate" should read "mitigate".
Ms. McCarthy moved to approve the Minutes of September 4, 2001, as corrected,
seconded by Mrs. Archer. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mrs. Archer - Yes;
Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes. Said
motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
Prior to the vote, Mrs. Archer stated she understands that discussions have been
taking place between Mr. DonFrancisco and Mr. Marincola with regard to resolving the
disagreement that they had that precipitated Item 9.A. on these minutes. Mrs. Archer asked if it
would be possible for the Commission to reconsider the vote on that item for the next meeting.
Mrs. Archer stated this would not mean that the Commission would change their vote but simply
would reconsider the Hotel Vista Del Mar Appeal and that it be open for discussion based upon
their resolution.
Mrs. Archer moved to amend the agenda by adding Item 9.H., Possible
Reconsideration of the Hotel Vista Del Mar Appeal to a date certain of October 2, 2001,
seconded by Mr. Levinson. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Levinson -
Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes. Said
motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
0
PROCLAMATIONS:
6.A. Breast Cancer Awareness Month - October 2001 & Mammography Day -
October 19~ 2001
Mayor Schmidt noted a proclamation proclaiming the month of October as Breast
Cancer Awareness Month and October 19, 2001 as Mammography Day.
6oB.
Head Start Awareness Month - October 2001
Mayor Schmidt noted a proclamation proclaiming October 2001 as Head Start
-2-
09/19/01
Awareness Month.
6oC.
National Race Equality Day - September 19~ 2001
Mayor Schmidt read a proclamation proclaiming September 19, 2001 as National
Race Equality Day.
At this point, the time being 6:10 p.m., the Commission moved to Item 7,
Presentations.
PRESENTATIONS:
7.A Legislative Issues - Representative Bill Andrews~ Representative Anne
Gannon and Representative Richard Machek
Mayor Schmidt recognized the Legislative Delegation who was in attendance:
Senator Ron Klein, Representative Anne Gannon, Representative Richard Machek,
Representative Bill Andrews, Representative Irving Slosberg and Senator Mandy Dawson.
Mayor Schmidt stated the reason the City invited the members of the Legislative Delegation is
because the Commission feels it is important to interact with the State Legislators. In addition,
Mayor Schmidt stated there are a number of items that the Commission feels are of particular
concern both to the community and to the County. Mayor Schmidt stated the Commission would
like the opportunity to present these concerns to the Legislative Delegation and get some input
from them as well.
The following Legislative issues for 2002 were presented to the Legislative
Delegation:
e
Rewrite of the Community Redevelopment Act (Part III of Chapter 163, F.S.)
a. Local discretion should be allowed in the length of terms for appointed CRA
members.
b. Ensure that city CRA's continue to receive the TIF money from the County as
well as the City.
Boca Raton Airport
a. Considering the impact of aircraft noise on residents of Delray Beach, a
representative of Delray Beach should be added to the Boca Raton Airport
Authority.
Billboard Legislation
a. The state should not preempt the City's right to require removal of billboards as a
condition of a development order, or to amortize billboards not in conformance
with the City's zoning code.
Criminal Justice/Juvenile Justice
a. Support legislation to allow photographic enforcement of red light running in
Palm Beach County.
b. Support a grant of $600,000 to assist in acquiring and remodeling facilities for
Youth Enrichment Vocational Center. The model for our program, the Youth
-3-
09/19/01
e
a
10.
Automotive Training Center in Hollywood, is well proven as affective in turning
at risk youth from a criminal career to being contributing members of society.
Art in Public Places
a. Support funding Pineapple Grove Main Street's application for a $25,000 Cultural
Programs Grant to help construct the Pineapple Grove Art Walk.
Parks and Recreation
a. Support funding for the City's Florida Recreation Development Assistance
Program applications as follows:
(1) $107,250 for tennis courts at the Catherine Strong Center in cooperation
with the USTA on their "First Serve" initiative for inner city tennis.
(2) $50,000 for playground equipment at Barwick Park.
Library Expansion
a. Support fimding of the Delray Beach Library Public Library Construction Grant
for $500,000.
b. As the State Aid to Libraries program is reviewed this year, pursuant to CS/HB
337, ensure that libraries such as Delray Beach's remain eligible to receive State
aid for operating purposes.
Senior Citizens
a. State funding of $500,000 is requested to construct a facility that would serve as a
center for government and non-profit agencies providing services to our growing
senior citizen population.
Water Supply
a. Within the next two years the City expects to spend at least $4,200,000 in
modifying our water treatment process in order to comply with new, mandatory
drinking water quality standards. State assistance is requested to comply with this
unfunded mandate.
b. The South Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board facility currently
reclaims only about 25% of its effluent to use for irrigation. An additional 12
MGD could be reclaimed instead of being discharged to the ocean, where it may
contribute to algae on our reefs, but we need help with the cost. Using more
treated sewage effluent for irrigation will reduce use of surface waters and water
from the surficial acquifer for such purposes. The South Florida Water
Management District formerly gave grants for this purpose, but these funds have
now been diverted to pay the District's share of the Everglades Restoration.
Additional treatment and distribution facilities would cost $12-$18 million. State
assistance is requested in the amount of $3,000,000.
Sludge Pelletization Facility
a. Support funding for the state share, $1,875,000, of thc proposed regional sludge
pelletization facility to be operated by the Palm Beach County Solid Waste
Authority to serve Palm Beach, Martin and St. Lucie Counties and their
municipalities. This $12,500,000 facility will reduce by 4,100 tons annually land
application of phosphorus in the Everglades, Lake Okccchobec, and Indian River
Lagoon watersheds. We arc also seeking $6,000,000 from the federal
government, $1,125,000 from thc South Florida Water Management District and
$3,500,000 from the participating utilities.
-4-
09/19/01
11.
Regional Fire and Police Training Facility
a. The Fire Rescue Subcommittee of the Palm Beach County Intergovernmental
Coordination Program has determined there is a need to a regional fire/law
enforcement training facility in Palm Beach County, especially since the
responsibility for such training has been shifted to the Community College. The
cost of acquiring land and constructing such a facility is estimated at $20,000,000,
with another $5,000,000 required for equipment. Support is requested for funding
in the budget for Palm Beach Community College to acquire a site begin more
detailed planning for this badly needed central facility for regional fire and police
training.
There was a rapport between the Legislative Delegation and the Commission with
recommendations from the Legislative Delegation on how the Commission should proceed with
the Legislative issues for FY 2002. They all agreed that the Commission should lobby to get
their concerns on budgets and attend meetings in Tallahassee.
7.B. Government Finance Officers Association Distineuish Budget Award
presented to the City of Delra¥ Beach for FY 2000-2001
Mayor Schmidt presented Joe Safford, Finance Director, with the Government
Finance Officers Association Distinguished Budget Award. Mr. Safford came forward to accept
the plaque and stated this is the fourteenth year that the Finance Department has received this
award.
CONSENT AGENDA: City Manager Recommends Approval.
8.A. RELEASE/CANCELLATION OF WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT
0710-1800 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY: Approve the release and/or cancellation of a Water
Service Agreement for property located at 1710-1800 North Federal Highway (fka Arrow Trailer
Park), said property has been annexed into the City and is connected to City water and sewer.
8.B. REQUEST TO ALLOW A TEMPORARY MODULAR
BUILDING/MAROONE FORD: Approve a request to allow a temporary modular building at
Maroone Ford, located at the northwest comer of Linton Boulevard and Wallace Drive (1311
Linton Boulevard), for use as offices for a period of one (1) year while building improvements
are constructed.
8.C. CLOSEOUT CHANGE ORDER # 1 & FINAL PAYMENT /CHAZ
EQUIPMENT (ROYAL PALM BOULEVARD): Approve closeout Change Order # 1 in the
net deduct amount of $3,716.00 and final payment in the amount of $20,051.00 to Chaz
Equipment for the Royal Palm Boulevard Paving and Drainage Improvements. Funding is
available from 448-5461-538-65.04 (Stormwater Utility-Royal Palm Boulevard).
8.D. RESOLUTION NO. 58-01: Approve Resolution No. 58-01 supporting
implementation of aquifer storage and recovery technologies for the purpose of protecting the
environment and public water supplies.
-5-
09/19/01
The caption of Resolution No. 58-01 is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF AQUIFER STORAGE AND
RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF
PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WATER
SUPPLIES AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(The official copy of Resolution No. 58-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office.)
8oEo
CONTRACT ADDITION/CORPORATE CONNECTION SOVEREIGN:
Approve a contract addition to Corporate Connection Sovereign's contract for bus rental and
driver service for the Rock's Football and Summer Day Camp programs in the amount of
$17,361.25. Funding is available from 115-4912-572-55.30 (Rocks Football) in the amount of
$7,361.25, and 001-4106-572-44.90 (Summer Day Camp) in the amount of $10,000.00.
8.E.
REVIEW OF APPEALABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT BOARD ACTIONS:
Accept the actions and decisions made by the Land Development Boards for the period
September 4, 2001 through September 14, 2001.
8.G.
AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS (ADDENDUM ITEM):
Bid award in the amount of $45,300.00 to ADDCO, Inc. for the purchase of
two (2) trailer-mounted programmable electronic message signs. Funding is
available in 001-2316-525-64.90 (Emergency Management, Other
Machinery/Equipment).
8.H.
AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH CRA
FOR PLANNING AND OTHER SERVICES~ AND INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH
CRA FOR WEST ATLANTIC REDEVELOPMENT COALITION, INC. (ADDENDUM
ITEM): Consider approval of two separate interlocal agreements that will extend existing
funding requirements between the City and the Community Redevelopment Agency to
September 30, 2002, which provides for the CRA to pay the City for planning and parking
management services, and for the City to assist in funding staff support for WARC.
Mr. Perlman moved to approve the Consent Agenda as amended, seconded by
Ms. McCarthy. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor
Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes. Said motion
passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
REGULAR AGENDA:
FUNDING FOR SPECIAL EVENTS & CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS:
Consider approval of the recommended funding allocations for special events and charitable
-6-
09/19/01
organizations for FY 2002.
Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager, stated this is staff's recommendation
regarding filnding for special events and charitable organizations for the FY 2001-02 budget.
Mr. Barcinski stated the five-member committee reviewed the numerous requests the City
received this year. Mr. Barcinski explained that there are two funding sources. One funding
source being the Special Events Account and the City Commission budget, which per City policy
has been set at $50,000. The other funding source is the Charitable Contribution Grant Account
which previous policy is limited to 1% of general fund budget. In the event account, Mr.
Barcinski stated a total of $126,000 is being requested because the First Night request is now
$10,000 versus $20,000. In the grant funding (Exhibit "B"), the amount that is impacted by the
1% is $209,750 and the amount requested is $410,270. Mr. Barcinski stated that Exhibit "C" is a
chart of things that the City looked at for these grant requests such as the amount, their total
budget, other funding they may have available, net assets (undesignated), how many people they
served, and how many of those are Delray Beach residents.
With regard to Exhibit "A", Mr. Barcinski stated that the Education Board funding
is shown here. However, the Education Board funding is now included in the Community
Improvement Budget.
Mr. Levinson commented that he noticed that the Roots Cultural Festival did not
make a request this year and asked whether or not this was intentional? In response, Mr.
Barcinski stated the City has not received any cash requests fi.om the Roots Cultural Festival at
this time. The City Manager stated up until a few years ago, the City did provide some cash
support but also billed for a certain amount of the overtime. The City Manager stated the
decision was made to provide all the services to the Roots Cultural Festival without charging for
overtime and to stop the cash support.
Mrs. Archer commented that the same situation applies to "Celebrate the Soul"
because if indeed they do have the festival this year that will be some substantial services that are
required.
Mr. Barcinski stated the committee recommendation was not to give a cash
contribution and in the last event the City provided overtime in the amount of approximately
$13,000.
With regard to Exhibit "B", Mr. Levinson stated there was $30,000 requested from
the Mae Volen Senior Center and asked what this was for? In response, Mr. Barcinski stated
according to their application they indicated that funding will be used to offset the projected
$30,000 deficit in the cost of transportation services provided to Delray Beach senior citizens
which includes expenses associated with driver staffing. As the committee reviewed this
request, Mr. Barcinski stated they looked at their net assets, their other funding sources, their
overall financial picture, and their service to the community.
With regard to ABC Carpet, Mr. Perlman stated he noticed the amounts vary over
the years and asked what the reason is for this? In response, Mr. Barcinski stated he believes this
-7-
09/19/01
is based on the actual contract and the way this was structured with them. The City Manager
stated for a certain number of years ABC Carpet did receive an amount for each employee that
they hired who was a Delray Beach resident. In addition, ABC Carpet did receive other tax
rebates as well. As of January or February of this upcoming year, the City Manager stated
everything would be expired except for the property tax portion. On the property tax, the City
Manager stated they would get a rebate for the increase of property tax over what was being paid
on the property before they remodeled it.
Mr. Perlman asked if this is a ten-year deal, which will end in the year 2006? The
City Manager stated for the next five years the property tax rebate will continue but everything
else has run its course. The City Manager stated this is why the amounts vary from year to year
because certain parts of it have been expiring.
With regard to Exhibit "B", Mr. Levinson stated there is a footnote #8 under the
Urban League amount recommended for FY 2002 but there is no footnote #8 listed. Mr.
Levinson asked if this is CDBG money? In response, Mr. Barcinski stated this is CDBG money.
Mr. Levinson inquired about the $1,500 Coral Group and stated he does not see it listed as prior
year funding. Mr. Levinson asked if this includes the $10,000 of contingency money that was
established? In response, Mr. Barcinski stated he would need to look into this. Mr. Levinson
commented that there is not much money with regard to contingency. The City Manager stated
there is $6,000 for grants and Mr. Barcinski stated there is $4,250 recommended for the events.
Mr. Barcinski stated the actual amount budgeted in the line item is $49,250.
Mrs. Archer stated it is her understanding that we will not be doing mid-year
funding requests and this will be our budget. Mr. Barcinski stated generally if there are mid-year
requests, those requests would come to the Commission and the decision would be made at that
point in time. Mr. Barcinski stated there would be some contingency money available. Mrs.
Archer stated in the past the concern has been that some of these organizations wait until the last
minute to request funding. Mrs. Archer stated unless there is extreme circumstances, she
understood that the Commission was trying to discourage that kind of thing and wanted all the
requests for funding in advance. Mrs. Archer reiterated that her concern is that agencies are
given the opportunity to request funding in advance and stated unless there is an extreme
circumstance she does not feel the City should be funding these agencies because it causes
problems in the budget process,
Mr. Perlman commented that the Atlantic High School Band is going to go
somewhere every year and there is no request from them. Mr. Barcinski stated the Band has not
asked or received any funding. In 2001, Mr. Barcinski stated the Band did not ask for any
funding and staff has not received a funding request from them this year. The previous year, the
Band had a mid-year funding request for $1,500. The City Manager stated there are things that
will come up during the course of the year and feels the amount of money in the contingency
fund should be adequate.
Mr. Perlman commented about the safety patrol trips because he stated the Band
and the Eagle-ettes also travel. Mr. Perlman stated he does not see the safety patrol as a City
function and feels this should be cut and invested elsewhere. Mr. Barcinski stated Orchard View
-8-
09/19/01
Elementary School and Plumosa Elementary School requested funding for the safety patrol.
Mr. Levinson stated that perhaps the City could ask the Education Board to make a
recommendation regarding whether the City should budget the $1,000 for the safety patrol. The
Commission would like to see them participate in some way with assisting kids who might
otherwise not get to go and let them work with the schools. With regard to the Education Board,
Mr. Levinson concurred with comments expressed by Mr. Perlman.
Ms. McCarthy stated she would support the funds being transferred to another line
item (i.e. the contingency fired) so that if things of that nature show up and other things that are
most relevant in the next year, the Commission would then have the flexibility to attribute dollars
where needed. Ms. McCarthy stated that the needs might change significantly this next year.
Mrs. Archer stated she would certainly support transferring the $1,000 to the
contingency fund with an earmark that the Education Board has the opportunity to recommend
disbursement of the money. Furthermore, Mrs. Archer stated she would like to see the funds
earmarked in some way for education or educational activities.
Mayor Schmidt suggested that the Commission approve moving the $1,000 into
the contingency fund and give direction to the Education Board to work with the Education
Foundation to see if they can come back with a recommendation to the Commission whether the
money should be spent for safety patrol or some other program that would benefit more children.
Ms. McCarthy moved to approve transferring $1,000 from the safety patrol trips
line item to the contingency fund; and, give direction to the Education Board to work with the
Education Foundation to see if they can bring back to the Commission with a recommendation
whether the money should be spent for safety patrol or some other program that would benefit
more children, seconded by Mrs. Archer. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows:
Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer- Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms.
McCarthy - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
At this point, the time being 7:10 p.m., the Commission moved to the duly
advertised Public Hearings portion of the agenda.
10.A. ORDINANCE NO. 45-01: An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 1-98, which
comprises Waterford Place SAD (Special Activities District), to eliminate the condition of
approval requiring a certificate of occupancy for the hotel to be issued prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for the final multi-family building, located on the south side of Linton
Boulevard between Interstate-95 and Lindell Boulevard. Prior to consideration of passage of
this ordinance, a public heating has been scheduled to be held at this time. Quasi-Judicial
Hearing
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 45-01:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
-9-
09/19/O 1
NO. 1-98 WHICH COMPRISES THE SAD (SPECIAL
ACTIVITIES DISTRICT) ZONING ORDINANCE AND
CONDITIONS FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT FOR
WATERFORD PLACE, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF LINTON BOULEVARD, BETWEEN
INTERSTATE-95 AND LINDELL BOULEVARD, BY
AMENDING SECTION 1, BY REPEALING PARAGRAPH 20,
TO ELIMINATE THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL
REQUIRING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE
HOTEL TO BE ISSUED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE FINAL
APARTMENT COMPLEX BUILDING; PROVIDING A SAVING
CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
(The official copy of Ordinance No. 45-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office).
A public heating was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the
laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
The City Attorney noted that this item would be conducted as a quasi-judicial
hearing because it applies to a specific piece of property.
The City Attorney asked the Commission to disclose any ex parte contacts.
Mayor Schmidt stated he had no ex parte contacts. Ms. McCarthy stated she
had no ex parte contacts. Mr. Levinson stated he did have contact with Sam Pool, Attorney for
the applicant. Mr. Perlman stated he had a brief telephone conversation with Tom McMurrain
of Ocean Properties. Mrs. Archer stated she also had a brief conversation with Tom
McMurrain of Ocean Properties.
Barbara Garito, City Clerk, swore in those individuals who wished to give
testimony on this item.
Jeff Costello, Principal Planner, entered into the record the Planning and Zoning
Department's project file #2001-211.
Mr. Costello stated in May of 1996, the SAD/DRI-DO for Waterford Place was
modified to replace the approved 22,41 square feet of office space with 300 residential units and
a seventy-eight (78) room hotel. To assure the construction of this element of the SAD, a
condition of approval was placed on the modification that required the hotel component to be
constructed prior to the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy for the multi-family
component.
The new developer is now seeking removal of the condition so build-out of the
apartments can occur. As the development is part of a SAD the change is processed as a
-10-
09/19/01
rezoning. The shortage of hotel rooms is being satisfied with the newly approved and proposed
hotel rooms (Spanish River 120-135 new rooms, Hotel Vista Del Mar 70 rooms).
At its meeting of August 20, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Board held a public
heating in conjunction with review of the request. The Board voted 7-0 to recommend that the
condition of approval be removed, based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3
(Performance Standards) and Section 2.4.5(D)(5) (Rezoning Findings) of the Land Development
Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request to eliminate the condition of
approval requiring a Certificate of Occupancy for the hotel prior to the issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy for the final apartment complex building for the Waterford Place SAD, based
upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) and Section
2.4.5(D)(5) (Rezoning Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Alan J. Ciklin~ Attorney representing property, owner~ stated he would only
answer questions if the Commission has any concerns.
There being no one else who, having been duly swom, wished to address the
Commission on this issue, the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Penman moved to adopt Ordinance No. 45-01 on Second and FINAL
Reading, seconded by Mr. Levinson. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr.
Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt -
Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
Prior to the vote, Mrs. Archer stated originally the concern was that this space is
used for hotels and she does realize that there are additional hotels coming into the City. Mrs.
Archer asked the Commission if they want to have that area of land reserved for hotels or do they
not care at all what the usage is? Mrs. Archer stated she feels this was a very strong concern for
the past Commission and she does not want to go against the Commission with regard to the
location. Mrs. Archer stated she realizes there are a substantial number of hotel rooms going in
now.
Mr. Costello stated the condition related to the timing of the construction of the
hotel still requires a seventy-eight (78) room hotel. Furthermore, Mr. Costello explained that it is
just the timing of when that gets constructed and stated this was tied in with the development of
the apartment complex. The applicant could not obtain their last Certificate of Occupancy (CO)
until this was completed. Therefore, Mr. Costello stated it does not seem appropriate at this
time. Mrs. Archer stated as long as this would not change the usage of the land, then she has no
problem with approving it.
10.B. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CITY ORDINANCE (TOWN SQUARE):
Consider a request from Town Square, 55 NE 5th Avenue for a waiver to the provision of Section
4.6.7(E)(1), Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(d)(ii) and Section 4.6.7(G)(7) of the Sign Code in the City's
-11-
09/19/01
Land Development Regulations. The City will consider waiving the provision of the code that
states flat wall signs must face dedicated street frontage, and also states that signs must be
located over the business they represent. Also that signs totally in the standard setback are
required to have a sign area of 20-square feet or less, and where a property has more than one
frontage, a second freestanding sign is limited to a sign area of 50-square feet. Staff
recommends denial. Quasi-Judicial Hearing
The City Attorney asked the Commission to disclose any ex parte contacts. Mr.
Perlman stated he received a telephone call from Bill Branning that he did not have the
opportunity to remm. Mrs. Archer stated she had a telephone conversation but does recall whom
with. Mrs. Archer stated she would have to inform the City Clerk's office later. Mr. Levinson
stated he had no ex parte contacts. Ms. McCarthy and Mayor Schmidt stated they had no ex
parte contacts.
The City Attorney stated all involved parties would conduct this item as a quasi-
judicial heating, which allows for presentations, the admission of documents into the record and
public testimony.
Barbara Garito, City Clerk swore in Lula Butler, Director of Community
Improvement. The City Attomey stated this applies to both waivers.
Lula Butler, Director of Communi ,ty Improvement~ stated this is before the
Commission to consider a waiver to Section 4.6.7(E)(1) & (G)(7) of the Land Development
Regulations governing signs pursuant to the request from the Town Square Office Development
located at 55 N.E. 5th Avenue. The applicant is proposing to have flat wall signs located on the
southwest and north elevations of their office building. The City Code provides that signs are
allowed to be placed on buildings when there is dedicated street frontages. In this case, Ms.
Butler stated the signs are along 5th Avenue and the property can be interpreted to be along 1st
street because it is part of the entire property. Ms. Butler stated the sign that staff has the biggest
problem with is the south elevation because there is no dedicated street right-of-way for this
particular sign. Ms. Butler stated the reason staff disagrees with the sign on the north elevation
is that the Code also states that "signs should be placed over the tenant space that the tenant
occupies." Ms. Butler stated staff was not able to get the assurance from the agent that this sign
on the north elevation will be the sign of the tenant occupying the space where the sign is
located. Ms. Butler stated in her discussions with staff, the owner is looking to have some
visibility of the building so that it can be easily identified from Atlantic Avenue in both the
North and South Federal Highway corridors. Ms. Butler explained that in Section 2.4.7(B) of the
Land Development Regulations allows the City Commission to grant waivers to this section of
the code that governs signs. This section states that before granting a waiver, the Commission
shall make a finding of fact based on one of the following:
Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area
Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities
Shall not create an unsafe situation; and
Does not result in the granting of a special privilege in that the same waiver would
not be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or
-12-
09/19/01
Mrs. Archer stated she does not have a problem with the lower signs, but stated
she does have a great deal of difficulty with the sign on the south elevation. Mrs. Archer stated
she agrees with staff's recommendation to deny the request for waiver.
Mrs. Archer moved to deny the request for waiver of City ordinance from Town
Square, seconded by Mr. Levinson. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mrs.
Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman -
No. Said motion to deny passed with a 4 to 1 vote.
10.C. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CITY ORDINANCE (CREATIONS):
Consider a request from Creations, 101 NE 2nd Avenue, for a waiver to the provision of Section
4.6.7(E)(1), Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(d)(ii) and Section 4.6.7(G)(7) of the Sign Code in the City's
Land Development Regulations. The City will consider waiving the provision of the code that
states fiat wall signs must face dedicated street frontage, and also states that signs must be
located over the business they represent. Also that signs totally in the standard setback are
required to have a sign area of 20-square feet or less, and where a property has more than one
frontage, a second freestanding sign is limited to a sign area of 50-square feet. Staff
recommends denial. Quasi-Judicial Hearing
The City Attorney asked the Commission to disclose any ex parte contacts.
Mr. Perlman stated he would like to amend his disclosure for Item 10.B. Mr.
Perlman stated he did not speak to Bill Branning but the message was for this item. Mrs. Archer
stated she spoke with Mike Sneiderman, agent for the owner. Mr. Levinson, Ms. McCarthy, and
Mayor Schmidt stated they had no ex parte contacts to disclose.
The City Attorney stated all involved parties would conduct this item as a quasi-
judicial hearing, which allows for presentations, the admission of documents into the record and
public testimony.
Barbara Garito, City Clerk, swore in those individuals who wished to give
testimony on this item.
Lula Butler~ Director of Community Improvemenh stated this item is for
consideration before the Commission of a waiver to Section 4.6.7(G)(7) of the Land
Development Regulations goveming signs pursuant to the request from the business "Creations,"
located at 101 N.E. 2na Avenue. Ms. Butler stated she feels this building is a wonderful addition
to the Pineapple Grove redevelopment area and the owner/agent has done a wonderful job with
tasteful signs. However, Ms. Butler stated this building has had three dedicated street frontages
and the item before the Commission is the number and the size of freestanding signs. They are
allowed to have the number of signs that they are proposing but the issue is the size. The first
sign is at the comer of 2nd Avenue and N.E. 1st Street. Ms. Butler stated this sign is at 68.82
square feet and is perfectly allowable. The Code states whatever number above the freestanding
signs that you are allowed to have they can be no greater than 50 square feet in size. It also
-13-
09/19/01
states that when a sign is totally in the setback it can be no taller than seven feet and no greater
size than 20 square feet. This sign is the exact same size as the sign located on 2na Avenue and
1st Street. Ms. Butler stated the issue is with size and the location. Ms. Butler reiterated that
staff could not administratively approve this waiver because it does not meet the Code. Unless
the owner can come up with some hardship that they can explain that is unique to their property,
Ms. Butler stated the Commission would encounter this decision with other properties. Ms.
Butler explained that this item was not heard by SPRAB because four members had a conflict of
interest. Furthermore, Ms. Butler stated the Pineapple Grove Association is in support of this
sign being waived by the Commission.
The City Attorney stated the public hearing is open for public comment.
Michael Sneiderman, a~ent for the owner~ stated the issue is the size of the sign
and stated no one is looking at the quality of the sign. Mr. Sneiderman stated with this particular
situation they have taken into consideration the structures on either side. Mr. Sneiderman stated
both signs are 57 inches tall and 80 inches wide and the signs involve a pineapple on each side.
The pineapples are hand-sculptured stone that are placed on either side of the sign. Therefore,
Mr. Sneiderman stated the actual size of the sign is 31 square feet and fits into the category of 50
feet. Mr. Sneiderman stated he feels the sign must be this size because if someone is coming
fi.om the north driving in the southerly direction, if they miss the driveway they have no where to
go because this driveway is the only entrance into Creations. Mr. Sneiderman stated they cannot
mm left because this is a one-way street going west and they would have to completely
renegotiate where they are. Mr. Sneiderman he was looking for symmetry in the entire project.
One sign has been approved on the comer so that northbound traffic and eastbound traffic to that
point can see the sign. Mr. Sneiderman reiterated that there has to be a sign if someone is
driving in the southerly direction because this is the only entrance into Creations. With regard to
size, Mr. Sneiderman stated the size of the sign is consistent if one does not count the pineapples.
The City Manager stated if he understands this correctly this sign is in the setback
area and therefore it is limited to 20 square feet not 50 square feet.
Anthony Pugliese~ Developer~ stated one sign has already been approved and
feels it would not look right if the other sign were 11 feet smaller. Mr. Pugliese stated they are
trying to make everything look balanced and symmetrical. Mr. Pugliese stated these pineapples
are being shipped in from Mexico and are all hand carved out of limestone. Mr. Pugliese urged
the Commission to approve the sign as is otherwise he will have to come up with a different sign
and feels it will not look balanced.
Bill Branning~ 9 NE 2a~l Streeh with regard to the site plan and the location to
the sign, he stated the signs are approximately 300 feet apart. Also, Mr. Branning stated the
building is setback 150 feet from 2~a Avenue and when you are driving fi.om the north in the
southerly direction if you do not mm your head one can drive right past the building. Mr.
Branning stated for that reason he feels the signage is very important. Mr. Pugliese stated the
Pineapple Grove Design Committee did look at this and recommended approval.
Ms.
Butler stated she would like to clarify that the reason the pineapples were
-14-
09/19/01
included as part of the calculation of the sign structure is because the City's Sign Code states that
when you have decorative ornaments they are to be calculated and included because they become
signs within themselves. Ms. Butler stated it is a balanced look and the appearance of the sign is
a very good design. However, Ms. Butler stated she could not find a hardship for the
owner/applicant to make it different.
At this point, Barbara Garito, City Clerk, swore in Mr. Jim Smith.
Jim Smith~ 1225 S. Ocean Boulevard, stated he fully supports the applicants and
feels that for the purposes of Pineapple Grove the City should not count the pineapples in the
calculation of the sign.
Mayor Schmidt asked Mr. Pugliese if it would be feasible for him to move the
sign so that it is not in the setback area and therefore there would be no size limitation. Mr.
Pugliese stated he does not believe this is possible because there are parking spaces there. Mr.
Sneiderman stated the sign is at an angle and if it were moved back into the island it would
further back from the street at 90 degrees. Mr. Pugliese stated aside from the aesthetics it is very
important for the success of the project to be able to have signage so people who are driving
from the north to the south on Pineapple Grove Way can see the entrance to Creations. Mr.
Pugliese stated people who miss the driveway have to go to the comer and drive all the way
around the block and feels this is a problem that needs to be addressed.
Mrs. Archer stated she went by the property to see the signs and commented that
there are two very attractive pineapples on the west elevation and two pineapples on the south
elevation and two pineapples on the southern side of town and now there are going to be two
pineapples on the north side of town. Mrs. Archer stated the pineapples themselves are so
beautiful and feel that they call attention to them. Mrs. Archer asked Mr. Pugliese if he would
consider just having the pineapples and not the sign? In response, Mr. Pugliese stated that if he
cannot have this sign then the project is doomed. Mr. Pugliese stated people are going to pass
the driveway and are going to find it to be an inconvenience to have to go around the block.
Mrs. Archer suggested that Mr. Pugliese keep the pineapples with a smaller sign. Mr. Pugliese
stated he could eliminate the two pineapples off the sign and have just the sign but he feels the
verbiage and the signage is more important than the pineapples.
Mr. Levinson stated even without the pineapples, Mr. Pugliese is at 31 feet so that
is in excess of the 20 square foot to be within the setback. Secondly, Mr. Levinson commented
that the pineapples could be placed somewhere else on the property and just would not be
adjacent to the sign. Mr. Levinson stated there are places within the property where the
pineapples could still be utilized because they are attractive. However, Mr. Levinson suggested
that the pineapples not be included in the calculation of the sign.
Ms. McCarthy stated she applauds how well the applicant has worked with the
City. Ms. McCarthy stated the Commission has to deal with the City Codes and the Signage
Codes as they are written at this time.
Ms. McCarthy moved to approve to deny the request for a waiver to Section
-15-
09/19/01
4.6.7(G)(7) of the Land Development Regulations Governing Sign Codes, seconded by Mr.
Levinson.
At this point, Mr. Perlman stated he could make the argument with the way the
project is situated that there is a hardship. Mr. Perlman stated this is a critical project for
Pineapple Grove and will support this.
Ms. McCarthy concurs with comments expressed by Mr. Perlman and feels this is
indeed a beautiful project. Ms. McCarthy stated this project is taller than the project that is on
the street frontage and is a beautiful color. Ms. McCarthy stated she understands why the
applicant would not want people to miss the entrance. She stated that is why one of the
suggestions was to take and put the signs at the entrance so people know the way to enter in and
that the pineapples be put in the walkway. Ms. McCarthy stated she feels the applicant can
resolve and fix this concern because she does not think this project will fail.
Mayor Schmidt stated if the pineapples were moved somewhere else on the
property; he could support a waiver for the size of the sign (31 square feet vs. 20 square feet)
because it then would be consistent with the other size. Mrs. Archer stated she concurs with
comments expressed by Mayor Schmidt.
Mrs. Archer stated she is in favor of denying the current motion and making a
new motion that the sign be allowed to be posted at 31 square feet without the pineapples.
The City Attorney asked if the maker of the motion would like to accept the
amendment or vote on the substitute amendment first? Ms. McCarthy stated she accepts the
amendment to the motion.
Mrs. Archer moved to approve to grant a waiver so that the sign be allowed to be
31 square feet as opposed to the 20 square feet currently allowed, predicated on the removal of
the two pineapples, second by Mr. Levinson. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows:
Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - No; Mrs.
Archer - Yes. Said motion passed with a 4 to 1 vote.
10.D. RESOLUTION NO. 55-01 (MILLAGE LEVY}: A resolution levying a tax on
all properties within the City of Delray Beach for operation and maintenance, and for payment of
principal and interest on bonded indebtedness for FY 2002. Prior to consideration of passage of
this resolution, a public heating has been scheduled to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Resolution No. 55-01:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, TO LEVY A TAX ON ALL
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION, AND TO
LEVY A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL AND
INTEREST ON BONDED INDEBTEDNESS, AND TO
-16-
09/19/01
ALLOCATE AND APPROPRIATE SAID COLLECTIONS
THEREUNDER.
(The official copy of Resolution No. 55-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office).
A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the
laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
The City Attorney stated the millage rate of 8.00 mills is five one hundredths of a
mill more than fiscal year 2001. The rolled back rate calculated under the TRIM law for
operating purposes is 6.6423 mills. The millage rate is 12.46% above the rolled back rate.
Mayor Schmidt stated the resolution is to set the millage at 8.00 mills (7.37 mills
for operation and maintenance of the General Fund and 0.63 mills for the payment of principal
and interest on bonded indebtedness).
Mayor Schmidt declared the public hearing open. There being no one fi:om the
public who wished to address the Commission on this resolution, the public hearing was closed.
For the benefit of the public, Mrs. Archer commented that this is 0.1 mills less
than what was originally anticipated and stated she is pleased that the Commission is not in a
position of having to raise the rate any higher.
Mrs. Archer moved to adopt Resolution No. 55-01 with the millage rate of 8.00
mills as indicated on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Perlman. Upon roll call the
Commission voted as follows: Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes;
Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
Prior to the vote, Mr. Perlman stated he has sat with the City Manager reviewing
the budget at length. Mr. Perlman stated the measure of a good budget is whether this advances
the community's goals. Mr. Perlman stated this is a good budget and considering the hit that was
taken with regard to the Police and Fire Pension Fund, the amount of money invested the City
invested in the Police Department, the increased tip to the CRA, and the enormous insurance
premium for health insurance. Overall, Mr. Perlman reiterated that he feels this is a remarkable
budget and commended the City Manager for keeping it within reason. Mayor Schmidt echoed
the comments expressed by Mr. Perlman.
10.E. RESOLUTION NO. 56-01 (MILLAGE LEVY/DDA): A resolution levying a
tax on all properties within the Downtown Development Authority Taxing District of the City of
Delray Beach for FY 2002. Prior to consideration of this resolution, a public hearing has been
scheduled to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Resolution No. 56-01:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, TO LEVY A TAX ON ALL
-17-
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY TAXING DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, FOR MAINTENANCE AND
OPERATION, AND TO APPROPRIATE SAID COLLECTIONS
THEREUNDER.
(The official copy of Resolution No. 56-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office).
The City Attorney stated this resolution levies a tax in the amount of 1.00 mill on
all properties within the Downtown Development Authority Taxing District of the City of Delray
Beach for FY 2001-02. This millage exceeds the 0.8564 rolled back rate calculated under the
TRIM law by 16.77%.
A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the
laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
Mayor Schmidt declared the public hearing open. There being no one from the
public who wished to address the Commission on this resolution, the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Perlman moved to adopt a Resolution No. 56-01 on Second and FINAL
Reading, seconded by Mrs. Archer. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mayor
Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer- Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy -
Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
10.F. RESOLUTION NO. 57-01 (FY 2002 BUDGET ADOPTION): A resolution
making appropriations of sums of money for all necessary expenditures of the City of Delray
Beach for the period October 1, 2001 thorough September 30, 2002. Prior to consideration of
this resolution, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Resolution No. 57-01:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, MAKING
APPROPRIATIONS OF SUMS OF MONEY FOR ALL
NECESSARY EXPENDITURES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH FOR THE PERIOD FROM THE 1st DAY OF OCTOBER
2001, TO THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2002; TO
PRESCRIBE THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS
WITH RESPECT TO THE ITEMS OF APPROPRIATIONS AND
THEIR PAYMENT; AND TO REPEAL ALL RESOLUTIONS
WHOLLY IN CONFLICT WITH THIS RESOLUTION AND
ALL RESOLUTIONS INCONSISTENT WITH THIS
RESOLUTION TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH
INCONSISTENCY.
(The official copy of Resolution No. 57-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office).
-18-
O9/19/O 1
A public heating was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the
laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
Mayor Schmidt declared the public hearing open. There being no one from the
public who wished to address the Commission on the resolution, the public heating was closed.
Mr. Perlman stated he attend a Tourist Development Council Meeting this
morning in which there was a prediction that the bed tax was going to be decimated because of
what has happened in the economy with the terrorism incident. Mr. Perlman asked if the City
Manager if he is comfortable if the City ends up in a rough economic climate for the entire year?
In response, the City Manager stated this would have an impact. The primary impact the City of
Delray Beach would feel is in State shared revenue, which is largely from sales tax, and the City
will have to watch how the revenues come in as the year progresses. The City has had years
before where revenues did not come in as expected and steps were taken to deal with that
situation. The City Manager stated the City could cut back on things that we plan to buy. The
City Manager stated most capital spending is postponed until January and if need be the City can
place a freeze on hiring. The City Manager stated hopefully it will not come to this and stated
the City is certainly prepared to if need be. Furthermore, the City Manager stated the City has
been conservative in estimating the revenues on that and it could be significantly short or
significantly over. The City Manager stated this is a new way of living and collecting the tax
and he does not know what the full impact of this will be. The City Manager explained that this
is another unknown on top of the national economy.
Mr. Perlman moved to adopt Resolution No. 57-01 to include amended Exhibit
"A" on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Levinson. Upon roll call the Commission
voted as follows: Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy -
Yes; Mayor Schmidt- Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
IO.F. 1.
APPROVAL OF FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN: Accept
the Planning and Zoning Board's finding that the proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
and FY 2002 Capital Improvement Budget are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and
approve same.
The City Manager pointed out staff recommends amending the Capital
Improvement Program to add two projects. One project is the hurricane hardening of the
Community Center, which will provide hurricane shelter for 835 people. The City Manager
stated the cost is $521,725 to be 90% funded by an Emergency Preparedness Grant from the
State and will not be done unless the grant is approved. The second project would be the
construction of two-lighted tennis courts at the Catherine Strong Center. The City Manager
stated the cost is $143,000 to be 75% funded by a Florida Recreation Development Assistance
Program (FRDAP) Grant as part of the "First Save" program initiated by the United States
Tennis Association (USTA) in cooperation with the governor's office. The City Manager
explained that by amending the Capital Improvement Program to include these two projects
would make them more competitive at the State level in applying for these grants.
-19-
09/19/01
Mayor Schmidt declared the public hearing open. There being no one from the
public who wished to address the Commission on this issue, the public hearing was closed.
Mrs. Archer moved to approve the five-year Capital Improvement Plan and
Capital Improvement Budget consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and approve as amended
to include the two projects, seconded by Mr. Perlman. Upon roll call the Commission voted as
follows: Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes;
Mr. Perlman - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
10.G. ORDINANCE NO. 46-01: An ordinance amending Chapter 52, "Water" of the
Code of Ordinances by amending Section 52.34, "Water Rates", to provide for increased
residential, nonresidential and irrigation rates for FY 2002. Prior to consideration of this
ordinance, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 46-01:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 52
"WATER", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, BY AMENDING SECTION 52.34,
"WATER RATES", SUBSECTION 52.34(B), TO PROVIDE FOR
INCREASED RESIDENTIAL, NONRESIDENTIAL AND
IRRIGATION RATES FOR FY 2002; PROVIDING A
GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(The official copy of Ordinance No. 46-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office).
A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the
laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance.
Mayor Schmidt declared the public hearing open. There being no one who
wished to address the Commission on this ordinance, the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Perlman commented that he has received a few letters and telephone calls
regarding this issue. Mr. Perlman stated he has informed the people that this is on the City's
legislative wish list and stated there was a perception that people are being penalized for
conserving water. Mr. Perlman stated he sees it as the City is getting hit with a $4.2 million bill
from the Federal Government that needs to be paid for and feels the City has done a good job
with holding the rates.
Mr. Perlman moved to adopt Ordinance No. 46-01 on Second and FINAL
Reading, seconded by Mr. Levinson. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr.
Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer -
-20-
09/19/01
Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
10.H. ORDINANCE NO. 4%01: An ordinance amending Chapter 53, "Sanitary
Sewers", of the Code of Ordinances by amending Section 53.130, "User Charges; Wholesale
Sewer Rates; Calculation of Sewer Surcharge", to provide for increased residential and
nonresidential/commercial rates for FY 2002. Prior to consideration of this ordinance, a public
hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 47-01:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 53,
"SANITARY SEWERS", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, BY AMENDING SECTION
53.130, "USER CHARGES; WHOLESALE SEWER RATES;
CALCULATION OF SEWER SURCHARGE", SUBSECTION
53.130(D), TO PROVIDE FOR INCREASED RESIDENTIAL
AND NONRESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL RATES FOR FY
2002; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A
SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(The official copy of Ordinance No. 47-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office).
A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the
laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
The City Attomey read the caption of the ordinance.
Mayor Schmidt declared the public hearing open. There being no one who
wished to address the Commission regarding this ordinance, the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Perlman stated the water rates have not been raised since October 1997.
Mr. Perlman moved to adopt Ordinance No. 47-01 on Second and FINAL
Reading, seconded by Ms. McCarthy. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Ms.
McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson -
Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
Prior to the vote, Mrs. Archer stated that this equates to an increase of ½ a percent
for a residential customer billed for 12,000 gallons of sewer service.
Mr. Levinson stated there was a concern raised at a previous meeting with regard
to what is classified as an "average customer" and inquired if anything was determined regarding
this? Joe Safford, Finance Director, stated there was really no time to mn the program.
However, Mr. Safford stated the number is quite high because the multi-family homes are
calculated on a per unit basis. Therefore, Mr. Safford stated if you take a multi-family complex
-21-
09/19/01
that is on a master meter and divide it by the number of units, that is also added in. Mr. Safford
stated that is why there are a large number of people that use under the 6,000 gallons average.
Mr. Safford stated the average single family resident uses approximately 12,000 gallons.
I0.I. ORDINANCE NO. 48-01: An ordinance amending Chapter 51, "Garbage and
Trash", of the Code of Ordinances by amending Section 51.70, "Regular Charges Levied", to
provide for contracted garbage, trash, recycling, vegetation and bulk waste collection service
rates for FY 2002. Prior to consideration of this ordinance, a public heating has been scheduled
to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 48-01:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 51, "GARBAGE AND TRASH", OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, BY
AMENDING SECTION 51.70, "REGULAR CHARGES
LEVIED", TO PROVIDE FOR INCREASED RESIDENTIAL
AND COMMERCIAL COLLECTION SERVICE RATES FOR
FY 2002; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A
SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(The official copy of Ordinance No. 48-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office).
A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the
laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance.
Mayor Schmidt declared the public hearing open. There being no one from the
public who wished to address the Commission regarding this ordinance, the public heating was
closed.
Mr. Perlman moved to adopt Ordinance No. 48-01 on Second and FINAL
Reading, seconded by Ms. McCarthy. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mayor
Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy -
Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
10.J. ORDINANCE NO. 49-01: An ordinance amending Chapter 96, "Fire Safety and
Emergency Services", Section 96.66, "Emergency Medical Transportation Fees", of the Code of
Ordinances to adjust the fee schedule for emergency medical transportation in accordance with
the National American Fee Schedule. Prior to consideration of this ordinance, a public hearing
has been scheduled to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 49-01:
-22-
09/19/01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 96, "FIRE SAFETY AND EMERGENCY
SERVICES", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, BY AMENDING SECTION 96.66,
"EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION FEES",
SUBSECTION 96.66(A), TO ADJUST THE FEE SCHEDULE
FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL AMERICAN FEE
SCHEDULE; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER
CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(The official copy of Ordinance No. 49-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office).
A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the
laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance.
Mayor Schmidt declared the public hearing open. There being no one from the
public who wished to address the Commission regarding this ordinance, the public hearing was
closed.
Mr. Perlman moved to adopt Ordinance No. 49-01 on Second and FINAL
Reading, seconded by Mrs. Archer. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr.
Peflman - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt -
Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
10.K. ORDINANCE 50-01: An ordinance repealing Chapters 57 and 58 of the Code
of Ordinances, and creating a new Chapter 57 entitled "Right-of-Way Application Process for
Communications Facilities"; amending Chapter 50, "Utilities Generally; Public Service Tax", by
deleting all references to Telecommunications Facilities; amending Chapter 93, "Cable
Television" by removing the requirement to pay Franchise Fees to the City; providing for
reservation of rights and remedies. Prior to consideration of this ordinance, a public hearing has
been scheduled to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 50-01:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, RELATING TO COMMUNICATIONS
FACILITIES IN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY BY REPEALING
CHAPTERS 57 AND 58 AND CREATING A NEW CHAPTER
ENTITLED "RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATION PROCESS FOR
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES"; AMENDING CHAPTER
50, "UTILITIES GENERALLY; PUBLIC SERVICE TAX" BY
DELETING ALL REFERENCES TO
-23-
09/19/01
TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES; AMENDING
CHAPTER 93, "CABLE TELEVISION" BY REMOVING THE
REQUIREMENT TO PAY FRANCHISE FEES TO THE CITY;
PROVIDING FOR RESERVATION OF RIGHTS AND
REMEDIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(The official copy of Ordinance No. 50-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office.)
A public heating was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the
laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida.
The City Attomey read the caption of the ordinance.
Mayor Schmidt declared the public hearing open. There being no one who
wished to address the Commission regarding this ordinance, the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Levinson moved to adopt Ordinance No. 50-01 on Second and FINAL
Reading, seconded by Mrs. Archer. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mrs.
Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman -
Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
ll.A.
City Manager's response to prior public comments and inquiries.
The City Manager had no comments or inquiries to prior public comments and
inquiries.
ll.B.
From the Public.
ll.B.1. Jim Smith~ 1225 S. Ocean Boulevard~ politely asked the Commissioners to sit
up in their chairs and speak directly into the microphones because it is difficult to hear what they
are discussing.
Mr. Smith thanked Paul Dorling, Planning Director, for his time in explaining the
Beach Renourishment System and feels he is a very valuable employee.
Also, Mr. Smith thanked Scott Aronson, Parking Management Specialist, who has
been working with him and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) along with the
Seagate Hotel in alleviating the valet parking problem. Mr. Smith stated it appears that the
Seagate Hotel has eliminated the swale parking on the west side of A-1-A. Mr. Smith stated
there is going to be a meeting this Friday with the Florida Department of Transportation and Mr.
Aronson to look at other things in the area such as a "No Passing Zone" on A-1-A from Linton
Boulevard through Atlantic Avenue. Mr. Smith stated they are looking into the possibility of
putting in a 30-mile an hour speed limit sign heading northbound. Also, Mr. Smith explained
that they are looking at the possibility of extending the walking or the jogging path on the west
side of the road so that it will cross to the east side a little easier. Mr. Smith stated that it is very
-24-
09/19/01
confusing where to cross and the idea is to extend the sidewalk on the west side of the Seagate
Hotel property to Casuarina Road where there is a traffic light.
Lastly, Mr. Smith stated he has not yet received an answer regarding the system
he proposed to use a citizen volunteer police patrol to recognize the graffiti (i.e. graffiti spotters).
Mr. Smith stated he understands the City is working with the Police Department to see if this is
possible. Mr. Smith stated that in essence the graffiti removal people would only remove the
graffiti and the other people spotting the graffiti is free. Therefore, Mr. Smith feels this would be
a valuable double check for the system.
ll.B.2. Deborah Howard~ 1005 lnllraham Avenue~ stated she has written letters to the
City expressing her concerns of the construction project that is going on for the last ten months
in her neighborhood. Ms. Howard stated she feels the neighborhood has been treated unfairly in
terms of communication and information with this project. Ms. Howard stated it has been a
frustrating ten months with regard to the parking conditions, noise, and mess created from the
construction company (Tel-Con). Ms. Howard stated she would like some guarantee from the
construction company that after the project is completed, her property will be brought back to its
original condition before this construction started.
Mayor Schmidt informed Ms. Howard that when he received her letter he asked
the City Manager to follow-up on her request with the contractor.
11.B.3. Alice Finst~ 707 Place Tavan~ stated she attended the Rules Making Committee
Meeting for the Citrus Canker 1900-foot radius rules in Broward County. Ms. Finst stated she
was extremely pleased to see that a number of Legislators from Broward County came to speak
in opposition to these rules making. Apparently, Ms. Finst stated the Department of Agriculture
never appropriately made the rules to cut down the trees at 1900 feet. Ms. Finst explained that
thousands of trees were cut down with no legal basis for what they were doing and they are now
trying to go back and re-write the rules for these public heatings. The next public hearing will be
held on Wednesday, October l0th from 10:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. Ms. Finst encouraged the
Commission to invite some of our Legislators to attend the meeting and speak on behalf of the
City.
Ms. Finst stated on Friday, September 21st there will be a trial held at the South
County Courthouse for Christopher Alexander who was arrested by the Sheriff from the
Department of Agriculture for refusing to allow tree cutting crews on his property. Ms. Finst
stated public support would be very useful and encouraged the Commission to attend this trial.
Ms. Finst thanked Richard Bauer, Code Enforcement Administrator, for the
policy that he now has on weekends for leaving his cell phone number when a citizen calls about
Code Enforcement activities. Ms. Finst stated this is very helpful and keeps the public in touch.
Ms. Finst thanked Mayor Schmidt and Janet Meeks, Education Coordinator, and
the Delray Beach Education Board for presenting a resolution to Spady Elementary School last
week congratulating Spady students on the reading, math, and writing performances on the
FCAT.
-25-
09/19/01
At this point, the time being 8:10 p.m., the Commission moved to Item 9.B.
9.B. SPECIAL EVENT REQUEST/ART & JAZZ ON THE AVENUE (ALL
AMERICA CITY CELEBRATION): Approve a request to allow Art & Jazz on the Avenue to
be held on Thursday, October 18, 2001, from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Request includes approval
of the temporary use permit and street closure (Atlantic Avenue from Swinton Avenue to NE 7th
Avenue, Railroad Drive from Atlantic Avenue to NE 2nd Street and the usc of Veterans Park),
staff support for security and traffic control, banner hanging and removal, barricade set up and
removal, clean up, use and set up of City stages.
Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager, stated this is a request for the
Commission to endorse Art & Jazz on the Avenue scheduled for October 18, 2001 from 6:00
p.m. to 11:00 p.m., to grant a temporary use permit per LDR 2.4.6(H) for various street closures.
Mr. Barcinski stated for this event they are also requesting street closure of N.E. 2nd Avenue to
N.E. 2nd Street but leave N.E. 1st Street would be left open.
Mr. Barcinski stated this Art & Jazz on the Avenue would include the All
America City celebration, which will include a parade along Atlantic Avenue and a cake cutting
ceremony. The estimated overtime cost for this event is $7,300. At the last event, the overtime
costs were $7,130 and the City has capped this amount at $6,500. Mr. Barcinski stated the City
has the certificate of insurance and the hold harmless agreement. The Downtown Joint Venture
is requesting endorsement of the event as well as the permits and asking that due to this being an
All America City Celebration that all the overtime costs be waived.
Mr. Levinson suggested that the City send an invitation to certain people of the
Legislative Delegation, County officials, and possibly Federal officials. Mr. Levinson stated the
last couple of weeks have been rather hectic and feels since this is a unique event for the City we
could include others.
Mr. Perlman moved to approve the special event request for Art & Jazz on the
Avenue to be held on Thursday, October 18, 2001, from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., including
waiving all overtime costs, seconded by Mr. Levinson. Upon roll call the Commission voted as
follows: Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes;
Mrs. Archer - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.C. RESOLUTION NO. 59-01 (YEAR-END BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS):
Consider approval of Resolution No. 59-01 making year-end adjustments to the adopted budget
for FY 2001.
The caption of Resolution No. 59-01 is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 71-00 ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 19,
2000, AND RESOLUTION 32-01 ADOPTED MAY 1, 2001,
WHICH MADE APPROPRIATIONS OF SUMS OF MONEY
-26-
09/19/01
FOR ALL NECESSARY EXPENDITURES OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
2000/2001, BY SETTING FORTH THE ANTICIPATED
REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE
OPERATING FUNDS OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 2000/2001; REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS
INCONSISTENT HEREWITH.
(The official copy of Resolution No. 59-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office.)
Mr. Levinson moved to approve Resolution No. 59-01, seconded by Mrs. Archer.
Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes;
Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0
vote.
9.D. REJECTION OF BID/ALL-RITE PAVING CONTRACTORS, INC./NE 4TM
STREET FROM NE 2ND AVENUE TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY: Approve the rejection of
bid to All-Rite Paving Contractors, Inc., for the NE 4th Street from NE 2~d Avenue to Federal
Highway project. Sixty days have passed since the bid opening and the contractor is not willing
to hold the bid prices.
Dick Hasko, Director of Environmental Services, stated at this point, this is a
housekeeping issue. At the June 12th Workshop Meeting, this item was discussed at length. It
was the consensus of the Commission to look for alternatives to constructing 3 lanes on N.E. 4th
Street and the replacement of Mahogany trees as well as looking into underground utilities.
Mr. Hasko stated staff advertised this project for bid, staff opened the bids and
everything was in limbo and now the low bidder is only obligated to honor his bid for sixty days.
Mr. Hasko stated the City has gone past that sixty day period and explained the contractor has
indicated he is unwilling to continue to honor his bid. Therefore, Mr. Hasko stated the City has
to go through the formality of tossing out all the bids and going through the bid process again.
Mr. Hasko stated staff would need direction on what to do with this area. Mr.
Hasko stated the Commission had asked staff for additional information which staff is still
wrapping up. Mr. Hasko stated he is not sure what impacts any of the activities will have with
regard to the property owner's proposal (to the north). Mr. Hasko stated the City has an
obligation with the County because the City will be receiving a reimbursement of approximately
$240,000 for the work. Mr. Hasko stated that the City is to begin construction on this piece in
October and stated the agreement states the following: "The County shall only have this
reimbursement obligation for invoices received from the CITY prior to August 15, 2003."
Mrs. Archer asked if it would take another 90 days to re-bid this? In response, Mr.
Hasko stated the first thing that has to be done is for the Commission to decide whether they
wish to stay with the original design, stay with the alternative design, or do anything at all before
this project is re-bid. Mr. Hasko stated there was an alternative to potentially shift the section of
the roadway to the south and take out the trees on one side. With regard to burying the FPL lines
-27-
09/19/01
underground, Mr. Hasko stated this is a moot point because staff determined that whether the
lines are relocated overhead or underground, the trees are still in the way. Mr. Hasko feels staff
has not provided the Commission with enough information and suggested that this item be
placed on an upcoming Workshop Agenda for further discussion.
Mr. Perlman moved to approve the rejection of the bid to All-Rite Paving
Contractors, Inc., for the N.E. 4th Street from N.E. 2nd Avenue to Federal Highway project, with
the direction of placing this project on a Workshop Agenda, seconded by Ms. McCarthy. Upon
roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs.
Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.E. AWARD AGREEMENT/NOVA INFORMATION SYSTEMS~ INC. &
IMPERIAL BANK: Consider an agreement between the City and NOVA Information Systems,
Inc., and Imperial Bank for credit card services at the Delray Municipal Golf Course and
Lakeview Golf Course pro shops.
Joe Safford, Finance Director, stated that a few weeks ago the City awarded the
software package for the Municipal Golf Course and Lakeview Golf Course. Mr. Safford stated
this was done because the other software was outdated and the company went out of business.
The sot'tware vendor used a specific network for its handling of credit card transactions that
being the Nova Network. Mr. Safford explained that the City had an existing contract, which did
not expire until 2003 with another network. Mr. Safford stated the City began negotiations and
network rates were higher than the Commission is approving this evening. The vendor came
down on its fees to what we are currently being charged on the present network. Secondly, the
City had to negotiate with the present provider. Since the present provider also provides those
services for other facilities and those contracts are still in place, the provider will not charge the
City any type of contractual penalty for reducing the volume that was in the golf course. Mr.
Safford stated this is a request before Commission to approve the contract with Nova Network to
handle both golf courses at no increased cost to the City.
Mr. Safford stated this is considered a sole source provider because they are the
network that is used by the Software Company and are a very reputable and a very large
network.
Mrs. Archer moved to approve to award an agreement between the City and
NOVA Information Systems, Inc., and Imperial Bank for credit card services at the Delray
Beach Municipal Golf Course and Lakeview Golf Course, seconded by Mr. Perlman. Upon roll
call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson -
Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9oFo
CITY ATTORNEY EVALUATION.
Mayor Schmidt stated as an attorney, he has been quite pleased with the
performance of the City Attorney's office.
Mrs. Archer stated she has truly appreciated the City Attorney's direction and
-28-
09/19/01
fortitude over this past year. Mrs. Archer stated she feels it has been a difficult year and the City
Attomey has given the Commission good direction to procedural issues and stated her
performance as been exemplary. Mrs. Archer stated she would like to recommend that the City
Attorney receive the maximum five percent (5%) performance increase.
Mrs. Archer moved to approve a five percent (5%) performance increase for the
City Attorney, seconded by Mr. Perlman. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mrs.
Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman -
Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
Prior to the vote, Mr. Perlman stated he filled out the performance appraisal form
and read a few of his comments for the benefit of the public. Mr. Perlman stated the City
Attorney communicates regularly on legal issues and takes time to explain complex agenda
items. Mr. Perlman feels she has done a fine job with some difficult tasks such as Charter
Review. Mr. Perlman also commented that the City Attorney is a terrific ambassador and public
servant. Mr. Perlman stated he has developed a strong rapport with the City Attomey and he is
very comfortable with asking her questions. Mr. Perlman feels the City Attorney has developed
a great team whom are motivated to go above and beyond the call of duty (i.e. citrus canker
issue).
Ms. McCarthy stated for the City Attorney to explain things that are difficult in
nature to Jeff Perlman would be relatively easy in comparison to explaining it to her. Ms.
McCarthy feels the City Attorney does an excellent job to help prepare the Commission for
situations. Ms. McCarthy stated she feels it is more important to know when and when not to
speak out than to be assertive or aggressive on a continuous basis just to have something to say.
Ms. McCarthy feels the City Attomey has fashioned herself appropriately and handles her job
the way it is most appropriate for the City's needs.
Mr. Levinson stated he had the opportunity to sit with the City Attorney today and
feels she is doing a very good job.
9.G
CITY MANAGER EVALUATION.
Mayor Schmidt stated he wholeheartedly supports the job that the City Manager is
doing.
Mr. Perlman stated he feels the City Manager is a strategic thinker and has a
handle on all major issues. Mr. Perlman stated the City Manager is outstanding at seeing
opportunities and acting upon them. Mr. Perlman stated what impresses him the most about the
City Manager is that he has a vast knowledge of municipal govemment and his vast knowledge
of many issues. Mr. Perlman stated the City Manager knows where every dime is spent and this
makes him feel very comfortable. Mr. Perlman stated the City Manager makes
recommendations totally based on the facts.
Mrs. Archer stated she would have to ditto comments expressed by Mr. Perlman
and Mayor Schmidt. Mrs. Archer stated Delray Beach is exceptionally lucky to have had Mr.
-29-
09/19/01
Harden as the City Manager for so many years and hopes it continues for a long time to come.
Mr. Levinson stated he too feels the City Manager is doing a very good job.
Ms. McCarthy stated that every time she meets with the City Manager he always
knows how she feels. Ms. McCarthy stated the City Manager does his job very well and feels he
does an exceptional job with managing the dollars and knowing where the money is being spent.
Mrs. Archer moved to approve a five percent (5%) performance increase for the
City Manager, seconded by Ms. McCarthy. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows:
Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs.
Archer - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.H. POSSIBLE RECONSIDERATION OF HOTEL VISTA DEL MAR
APPEAL: To possibly reconsider the Hotel Vista Del Mar Appeal to a date certain of October
2, 2001.
Mrs. Archer moved to reconsider the heating of the Hotel Vista Del Mar appeal to
a date certain of October 2, 2001, seconded by Mr. Levinson. Upon roll call the Commission
voted as follows: Ms. McCarthy - Yes; Mayor Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer
- Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
Prior to the vote, Mayor Schmidt stated that the Commission is willing to hear
this on October 2nd, and stated he would like the public to understand that this does not mean that
the Commission is reversing their vote.
12.
FIRST READINGS:
12.A. ORDINANCE NO. 51-01: An ordinance annexing into the City the Fanelli
property located on the east side of Military Trail, north of Atlantic Avenue (immediately east of
the Boys Farmers Market) and establishing initial zoning of GC (General Commercial) for the
property. If passed, a quasi-judicial (as to zoning) public hearing will be scheduled for
October 2, 2001. Prior to consideration of this ordinance, a public heating has been scheduled to
be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 51-01:
N ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ANNEXING TO THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF MILITARY TRAIL, NORTH OF WEST
ATLANTIC AVENUE (IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE BOYS
FARMERS MARKET), AS THE SAME IS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, WHICH LAND IS
CONTIGUOUS TO EXISTING MUNICIPAL LIMITS;
REDEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY TO
-30-
INCLUDE SAID LAND; PROVIDING FOR THE RIGHTS AND
OBLIGATIONS OF SAID LAND; PROVIDING FOR THE
ZONING THEREOF TO GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL)
PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING
CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(The official copy of Ordinance No. 51-01 is on file in the City Clerk's office.)
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance.
Jeff Costello, Principal Planner, stated this is being processed in conjunction with
the Future Land Use Map Amendment (FLUM) 2001-01 which will be before the Commission
on October 2, 2001, at which time a quasi-judicial public hearing will be held with regard to the
zoning and staff recommends approval.
The City Manager stated staff is also working with the owner of the Post Office
piece to complete the entire project and end up with an entrance that works for both properties so
that they do not conflict with each other.
Mr. Perlman moved to approve Ordinance No. 51-01 on FIRST Reading,
seconded by Ms. McCarthy. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mayor Schmidt -
Yes; Mr. Perlman - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Levinson - Yes; Ms. McCarthy - Yes. Said
motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
13.
COMMENTS AND INQUIRIES ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS.
13.A. Ci~, Manager.
With regard to his performance evaluation, the City Manager stated he appreciates
the continued confidence and support from the Commission. In addition, the City Manager
stated it is a great pleasure to work with the City Attorney. He feels they work well together and
concurs with all the comments expressed about her.
Secondly, the City Manager announced that on Saturday, September 22ad he
would fly to Salt Lake City for the International City Manager's Association Conference. The
City Manager stated he would be out of town from Saturday, September 22"a through
Wednesday, September 26th.
13.B. Ci.ty Attorney.
With regard to her performance evaluation, the City Attorney thanked the
Commission for their continued support.
Secondly, the City Attorney thanked Jay Jambeck, Assistant City Attomey, for
the wonderful job he has done for the last three years. Mr. Jambeck stated he has enjoyed
-31-
09/19/01
working with the entire City Attorney staff and feels Delray Beach is a very special place. Mr.
Jambeck stated he would be leaving the City to take a job with Sachs Sax & Klein, P.A.
13.C.
13.C.1.
City. Commission.
Commissioner Levinson
Mr. Levinson stated at the DMBA Meeting this morning it was brought up that
where the valet parking signs are along Atlantic Avenue the City has removed the signs with the
parking rules when the valet is not on duty. Mr. Levinson stated there are in fact valet parking
signs with no parking direction signs on them and commented that maybe these were removed to
prevent clutter. However, Mr. Levinson stated in those spaces there is no direction as to what the
normal parking is other than during those hours.
With regard to E-mail regarding some of the traffic issues around the City, Mr.
Levinson commented about whether or not the Commission can possibly get on any of these E-
mail lists without having to go through the Chamber's Web site.
Mr. Levinson stated he spoke to Ms. Howard and stated before the City releases
any kind of payment to the construction company he feels the City should hold their feet to the
fire because there has clearly been a long drawn out time with regard to this project.
Lastly, Mr. Levinson stated that he attended the Tropic Isle Board of Directors
Meeting and gave a report to the residents regarding the dredging. Mr. Levinson stated this has
lingered on for some time and has been subject to great debate and misinformation. Mr.
Levinson stated he now feels the meeting has helped to clear up any misconceptions and many
unanswered questions.
13.C.2.
Commissioner McCarthy
Ms. McCarthy stated she is glad that everyone is here and safe. Ms. McCarthy
stated she certainly hopes that anyone who has family that have been touched directly by the
catastrophe that struck America on September 11th are okay and that they have been aided by
prayer. Ms. McCarthy stated that the City is open and receptive to communication from people
who have been affected. Ms. McCarthy stated there are many organizations that have put
together fundraisers or places where one can send dollars to help victims of the catastrophe. Ms.
McCarthy stated there is information available and she would be glad to funnel this information
to City Hall so if people would like to help they can do so. She indicated that the Real Estate
industry has joined together to assist with those in danger of loosing their homes.
The City Manager stated the Commission should have received a letter from the
United Way that talks about a special fired they have set up for those people who would like to
contribute. Ms. McCarthy stated the Red Cross has been very assertive in making sure that there
are listings in the newspaper in the television media and radio as well.
-32-
09/19/01
13.C.3. Commissioner Perlman
Mr. Perlman wished Jay Jambeck well and stated he has done a great job while
being employed with the City. Mr. Perlman feels Mr. Jambeck is joining a very good firm.
With regard to the Yachting Magazine, Mr. Perlman stated the Tourist
Development Council has taken on a special section, which references downtown Delray Beach
as a destination, it will appear in the October issue.
Mr. Perlman stated he attended a meeting of community chat on eminent domain
and stated apparently there is some misinformation being spread throughout the southwest of the
CRA's and the City's intention of purchasing homes and displacing people. Mr. Perlman stated
there was a very good speaker that laid out what eminent domain is all about.
Mr. Perlman stated Thursday evening the CRA committed $50,000 a year for five
years to dedicate to the West Settlers Historic District and publicly commended the CRA for the
long-term commitment they are making.
Lastly, Mr. Perlman stated although he has not appeared on the national media,
newspapers contacted him across the country as well as some international press taking about the
irony about the All America City harboring terrorists. Mr. Perlman stated he explained that this
was in no way a reflection of Delray and stated that we all know people who were personally
touched by this. Mr. Perlman stated the City will get through this and feels that no matter how
evil the nine terrorists were, it can not undo the spirit of this City or its people. Mr. Perlman
commented about the community service that was held last Friday at the Community Center.
Mr. Perlman stated it was wonderful to see everyone unified and feels it was a great event.
13.C.4.
Commissioner Archer
Mrs. Archer congratulated Jay Jambeck in his new endeavor.
Mrs. Archer commented that the Rotary Club has also set up a fund for
forwarding dollars to try and assist people who are particularly homeless or need additional
support. In addition, Mrs. Archer stated the Rotary Club has also agreed to do matching funds.
Mrs. Archer stated a local newspaper contacted her and she was asked the following question:
"Was it unfortunate that Delray had been associated with the terrorists and did she think that this
would have a major reflection on the City?" Mrs. Archer stated she informed the newspaper that
she really did not think that it would. Mrs. Archer stated that Delray Beach is a beautiful place
and it is unfortunate that even the terrorists thought so. Mrs. Archer feels Delray Beach is also a
place where the terrorists would have a lot more opportunity to blend in as opposed to the mid-
west where it is not as multi-cultural. Mrs. Archer stated she was also asked, "Would she look
at her neighbors differently or other individuals differently now that this has transpired?" Mrs.
Archer stated she had to say no because she feels we need to accept people at face value and
feels it is not her job to go around and check the background of individuals. Mrs. Archer feels
this is another area of the government and feels her job for the City is to try and maintain our
continuity, our community, and the village-like atmosphere. Mrs. Archer stated she cannot be
-33-
09/19/01
looking at her neighbors trying to decide whether or not they are terrorists.
13.C.5. Ma.yor Schmidt
Mayor Schmidt stated he has spent a lot more time with the media this past week
for some very unfortunate reasons.
Mr. Levinson stated he has received E-mails from friends around the country who
have said that the Mayor did an excellent job with regard to his on camera appearances.
There being no further business, Mayor Schmidt declared the meeting adjourned
at 8:55 p.m.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
MAYOR
The undersigned is the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, and the information
provided herein is the minutes of the Regular City Commission Meeting held on September 19,
2001, which minutes were formally approved and adopted by the City Commission on
City Clerk
NOTE TO READER:
If the minutes you have received are not completed as indicated above, this means they are not
the official minutes of the City Commission. They will become the official minutes only after
review and approval, which may involve some amendments, additions or deletions.
-34-
09/19/01
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach, Parks and Recreation Department,
Ocean Rescue D/vision, Lifeguard Competition Team competed in the 2001
United States Lifesaving Association National Lifeguard Championships in
Miami Beach, Florida on August 9th through the 11th, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the USLA National Championship brings lifeguards
throughout the country to compete in 13 ocean related skills, each focusing on
the Ocean Lifeguards' physical attributes in which over 800 male and female
lifeguards ages 18 to 60 years and up competed; and
WHEREAS, the Delray Beach Ocean Rescue Competition Team won the
Division II USLA (United States Lifeguard Association) National
Championships in Miami Beach, Florida and brought home the 4th place
overall team rifle; and
WHEREAS, this is the first year agencies with fewer than 100 employees
were recognized with a separate Division II National Championship. Delray
Beach Ocean Rescue has the honor of being the first team to win this Title and
its traveling trophy. This prestigious trophy is engraved with the winning
team's name and kept on display for a period of one year at the host city; and
WHEREAS, the involvement and achievements of the Delray Beach
Ocean Rescue Lifeguards in this national competition have generated much
c/vic and community pride,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DAVID W. SCHMIDT, Mayor of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, on behalf of the City Commission, do hereby recognize and
commend the 2001 Delray Beach Ocean Rescue National Championship Team
represented by Chris Wiley, Regis Smeltz, Walter Baum, Amy Schwarz,
Bethanne Schwarz, Mark Henkle, Shaun Gibson, James Newman, Jo
Wagenhals, Tom Hemenway and Mason Pearce for their representation of the
City of Delray Beach and offer them congratulations on a job well done in the
2001 United States Lifesaving Association National Lifeguard Championships.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the
Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed this 2nd day of
October, 2001.
David W. Schmidt
Mayor
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach, Parks and Recreation Department,
Ocean Rescue Division, Lifeguard Competition Team competed in the 2001
United States Lifesaving Association National Lifeguard Championships in
Miami Beach, Florida on August 9th through the 11tn, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the USLA National Championship brings lifeguards throughout
the country to compete in 13 ocean related skills, each focusing on the
Ocean Lifeguards' physical attributes in which over 800 male and female
lifeguards ages 18 to 60 years and up competed; and
WHEREAS, the Delray Beach Ocean Rescue Competition Team won the
Division II USLA (United States Lifeguard Association) National
Championships in Miami Beach, Florida and brought home the 4t~ place
overall team title; and
WHEREAS, this is the first year agencies with fewer than 100
employees were recognized with a separate Division II National
Championship. Delray Beach Ocean Rescue has the honor of being the first
team to win this Title and its traveling trophy. This prestigious trophy
is engraved with the winning team's name and kept on display for a period
of one year at the host city; and
WHEREAS, the involvement and achievements of the Delray Beach Ocean
Rescue Lifeguards in this national competition have generated much civic
and community pride,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DAVID W. SCHMIDT, Mayor of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, on behalf of the City Commission, do hereby recognize and
commend the 2001 Delray Beach Ocean Rescue National Championship Team
represented by Chris Wiley, Regis Smeltz, Walter Baum, Amy Schwarz,
Bethanne Schwarz, Mark Henkle, Shaun Gibson, James Newman, Jo Wagenhals,
Tom Hemenway and Mason Pearce for their representation of the City of
Delray Beach and offer them congratulations on a job well done in the
2001 United States Lifesaving Association National Lifeguard
Championships.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the
Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed this
2nd day of October, 2001.
MAYOR
David W. Schmidt
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
Request to be placed on:
AGENDA REQUEST
Date:
September 19, 2001
X Regular Agenda ~ SpecialAgenda ~Workshop Agenda
When: October 2, 2001
Description ofagendaitem: Request Mayor's signature on, and City Commission's
issuance of, Proclamation honoring the Delray Beach Lifeguard Competition
Team's participation in the USLA National Championships and their win in the
new fewer than 100 employees Division and 4th place overall team title.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES
Draft Attached: YES
NO x
NO x
Recommendation: Approve, sign and issue Proclamation.
Department HeadSignature: ~...~-_~.'-~
Determination of Consistency Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds):
Funding available:
Funding alternatives:
Account Number:
Account Description:
Account Balance:
City Manager Review:
Yes No
(if applicable)
Approved for agenda: Yes
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action: Approved
Disapproved
WH~.REA~, the Delray Beach Ocean Rescue Junior Lifeguard
Competition Team competed in the United States Lifesaving Association Junior
Lifeguard National Championships in Miami Beach, Florida on August 9, 2001;
and
WHEREAS, the Delray Beach Junior Lifeguard Team competed in
the following United States Lifesaving Association National Events: Distance
Run, Distance Swim, Distance Paddle, Beach Flags, Run-Swim-Run, and Surf
Rescue; and
WHEREA~, over 400 junior lifeguards from around the country,
including California, Illinois and New York competed in this national event,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DAVID W. SCHMIIFr, Mayor of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, on behalf of the City Commission, do hereby recognize
and commend the following Delray Beach Junior Lifeguards for their superior
achievement at the United States Lifesaving Championships:
Chelsea Fontes
Keith Fontes
Nicole Fontes
Kaitlin Godden
Molley Godden
Jillian Kenney
Ashley Manning
Andrew Meeder
Alyssa Teneyck
and recognize and commend the following Junior Lifeguards for
their achievements at the Southeast Regional Junior Lifeguard Competition in
Pompano Beach, Florida on July 28, 2001:
Michael Clark
Chase Dunn
Daniel GaEne
Christian Hei~ard
Lauren Herrington
Zack Jones
Casey Robertson
Nicole Schappert
Chris ~chmitt
Karah Worch
and recognize and commend Junior Lifeguard Instructors
Operation Supervisor Steve Zickl and Ocean Rescue Officer Tyler Adams,
and the entire staff of the Ocean Rescue Division for their commitment to the
youth of the City of Delray Beach, and offer them congratulations on a job well
done with the 2001 Delray Beach Junior Lifeguard Program.
IN WIT~ WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused
the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed this 2nd day of
October, 2001.
David W. Schmidt
Mayor
WHEREAS, the Delray Beach Ocean Rescue Junior Lifeguard Competition
Team competed in the United States Lifesaving Asssociation Junior
Lifeguard National Championships in Miami Beach, Florida on August 9,
2001; and
WHEREAS, the Delray Beach Junior Lifeguard Team competed in the
following United States Lifesaving Association National Events: Distance
Run, Distance Swim, Distance Paddle, Beach Flags, Run-Swim-Run, and Surf
Rescue; and
WHEREAS, over 400 junior lifeguards from around the country,
including California, Illinois and New York competed in this national
event,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DAVID W. SCMMIDT, Mayor of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, on behalf of the City Commission, do hereby recognize and
commend the following Delray Beach Junior Lifeguards for their superior
achievement at the United States Lifesaving Championships:
Chelsea Fontes
Keith Fontes
Nicole Fontes
Kaitlin ~odden
Molley Godden
Jillian Kenney
Ashley Manning
Andrew Meeder
Alyssa Teneyck
and recognize and commend the following Junior Lifeguards for their
achievements at the Southeast Regional Junior Lifeguard Competition in
Pompano Beach, Florida on July 28, 2001:
Michael Clark
Chase Dunn
Daniel ~agne
Christian Heigard
Lauren Herrington
Zack Jones
Casey Robertson
Nicole Schappert
Chris Schmitt
Sarah Worch
and recognize and commend Junior Lifeguard Instructors Operation
Supervisor Steve Zickl and Ocean Rescue Officer Tyler Adams, and the
entire staff of the Ocean Rescue Division for their commitment to the
youth of the City of Delray Beach, and offer them congratulations on a
job well done with the 2001 Delray Beach Junior Lifeguard Program.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the
Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed this
2nd day of October, 2001.
MAYOR
David W. Schmidt
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
Request to be placed on:
AGENDA REQUEST
Date:
September 19, 2001
X Regular Agenda ~ Special Agenda ~ Workshop Agenda
When: October 2, 2001
Description ofagendaitem: Request Mayor's signature on and City Commission's
issuance of Proclamation honoring the Delray Beach Junior Lifeguard Team's
participation in the USLA Junior Lifeguard National Championships.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES
Draft Attached: YES
Recommendation: Approve, sign and issue
NO x
NO x
Proclamation.
~eP~e nloHead Sig natu re: ~~~
ete 'nat' n of Consistency wit~,h/Comprehensive Plan:
v
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds):
Funding available: Yes
Funding alternatives:
Account Number:
Account Description:
Account Balance:
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: Yes
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action: Approved
No
Disapproved
(if applicable)
A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, PROCLAIMING "UNITED WE STAND MONTH" FOR
OCTOBER, 2001, IN COMMEMORATION OF THE INCREDIBLE RESCUE AND
RECOVERY ENDEAVORS AS A RESULT OF THE TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2001
TERRORIST ATTACKS ON THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; PROCLAIMING
HEARTFELT SUPPORT AND SYMPATHY TO THE THOUSANDS OF FAMILIES
WHOSE LIVES HAVE BEEN FOREVER IMPACTED BY THE TERRORIST
ATTACKS UPON THE TWIN TOWERS OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER IN THE
CITY OF NEW YORK, THE PENTAGON IN WASHINGTON, D.C. AND THE
DIVERTED PLANE CRASH IN THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA; AND URGING
EVERYONE TO "STAND UNITED" BEHIND THE GREATEST NATION... OUR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
WHEREAS, on Tuesday, September 11, 2001, the Umted States of America was attacked
by terrorists who lujacked an'planes to crash into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center m the
City of New York and the Pentagon m Washington, D C., as well as the terrorist balackmg of a plane
that was &verted from its original target and crashed m the State of Pennsylvama; and
WHEREAS, people of all walks of life have been physically, emouonally and spmtually
devastated by this senseless terrorist attack and will be forever impacted by the terromt's acts of
aggression and v~olence against the Umted States of America; and
WHEREAS, offers of support have come from all over the world to the Umted States and
its government officaals; to the thousands of rescue and recovery personnel; to thousands of mlured
people, and have extended heartfelt sympathy to the famthes who have experienced tragtc losses of
loved ones; and
WHEREAS, even m hght of tlus devastating tragedy, we, the people of the Umted States of
America will stand tall and umted; we will show a force of strength by pulhng together to help each
other through the emouonal and physical para and devastauon of the months ahead; and we vall
"Stand United" behind the greatest nauon, our Umted States of America
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DAVID W. SCHMIDT, Mayor of the City of Delray Beach,
Florida, on behalf of the City Comnnssion, do hereby proclaim October 2001 as
"UNITED WE STAND MONTH"
m commemorataon of the tremendous rescue and recovery endeavors in the City of New York,
Washington, D.C. and the State of Pennsylvania; extending heartfelt sympathy to thousands of
famthes and business owners who must began again to rebuild thetr byes and who will be forever
mapacted by this sensdess and t~agic act of terrorism; and urging all residents of the City to uStand
United", pulling together to show a force of strength behind the greatest nat~on.., our United
States of America.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Offictal Seal of
the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed flus 2na day of October, 2001
DAVID W. SCHMIDT
MAYOR
5985 Tenth Avenue North
Greenacres, FL 33463-2399
(561) 642-2006
(561) 642-2004 Fax
Emad qrpadm~.c~.qreenacres fi.us
Samuel J. Ferreri
Mayor
Wadie Atallah
C~ty Manager
Pamela S. Terranova
City Attorney
Sondra K. Hill
RE: Proclamation-
September 26, 2001 "United We Stand" ~ Month of Octobei~'~J-J1Y.
Dear Friends and members of the National League of Cities, Florida League of
Cities, Palm Beach County League of Cities, City Councils and City Managers:
At their special meeting of September 25, 2001, the Greenacres City
Council unanimously approved proclaiming "United We Stand" for the month
October, 2001. We are urging our residents to join us in recognizing the
incredible rescue and recovery effort in the City of New York, the Pentagon in
Washington, D.C. and in the State of Pennsylvania. Through this proclamation,
we want to show a force of strength by pulling together in the aftermath of the
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
On behalf of the City Council, I would like to request that your City Council
and/or Board of Directors consider joining us to proclaim "United We Stand" for
the month of October, 2001. This is a time when the people of the United
States of America must "stand tall and stand united" in support of our
governmental officials who have a monumental task in investigating the terrorist
attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001. As helpless as we feel at times
like this, we can "stand united" to demonstrate our steadfast support and "make a
difference".
In acknowledgement and recognition of the physical, emotional and
spiritual pain that has devastated all walks of life, we must now provide a means
for the healing process to begin.., let us all proclaim "United We Stand" for the
month of October, 2001. Please join us in our endeavor!
Most sincerely,
Enclosure: Proclamation
i~l~Ferre[i
RECEIVED
CITY CLERK
Richard C. Radcliffe Peter A. Noble Joseph M. Lee Theresa L. Whalen
Councilman Councilman Councilman CouncJIwoman
District I District II District III O~strK:t IV
Lorraine F. Reynolds
Councilwoman
City of Greenacres
5985 Tenth Avenue North
Greenacres, FL 33463-2399
(561) 642-2017
(561) 642-2004 Fax
Ema~l qrpadm~..c~ qreenacres.fl us
Samuel J. Ferrari
Mayor
Wadie Atallah
City Manager
Pamela S. Terranova
C~y Attorney
Sondra K. Hill
City Clerk
A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GREENACRES, FLORIDA, PROCLAIMING "UNITED WE STAND MONTH"
FOR OCTOBER, 2001, IN COMMEMORATION OF THE INCREDIBLE
RESCUE AND RECOVERY ENDEAVORS AS A RESULT OF THE TUESDAY,
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 TERRORIST ATTACKS ON THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA; PROCLAIMING HEARTFELT SUPPORT AND SYMPATHY TO THE
THOUSANDS OF FAMILIES WHOSE LIVES HAVE BEEN FOREVER
IMPACTED BY THE TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE TWIN TOWERS OF
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THE
PENTAGON IN WASHINGTON, D.C. AND THE DIVERTED PLANE CRASH IN
THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA; AND URGING EVERYONE TO "STAND
UNITED" BEHIND THE GREATEST NATION... OUR UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA.
WHEREAS, on Tuesday, September 11, 2001, the United States of America was attacked by terrorists
who hijacked airplanes to crash into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in the City of New York and the
Pentagon in Washington, D.C., as well as the terrorists hijacking of a plane that was diverted from its original
target and crashed in the State of Pennsylvania; and
WHEREAS, people of all walks of life have been physically, emotionally and spiritually devastated by this
senseless terrorist attack and will be forever impacted by the terrorist's acts of aggression and violence against
the United States of America; and
WHEREAS, offers of support have come from all over the world to the United States and its government
officials; to the thousands of rescue and recovery personnel; to thousands of injured people, and have extended
heartfelt sympathy to the families who have experienced tragic losses of loved ones; and
WHEREAS, even in light of this devastating tragedy, we, the people of the United States of America will
stand tall and united; we will show a force of strength by pulling together to help each other through the emotional
and physical pain and devastation of the months ahead; and we will "Stand United" behind the greatest nation,
our United States of America.
NOW, THEREFORE, i, Samuel J. Ferrari, Mayor, of the City of Greenacres, do hereby proclaim
"United We Stand Month" for October, 2001 in commemoration of the tremendous rescue and recovery
endeavors in the City of New York, Washington, D.C. and the State of Pennsylvania; extending heartfelt
sympathy to thousands of families and business owners who must begin again to rebuild their lives and who w~ll
be forever ~mpacted by this senseless and tragic act of terrorism; and urging all residents of the City to "Stand
United", pulhn! show a force of strength behind the greatest nation.., our United States of America
Richard C r A. Noble Joseph M Lee
Councilman Counc, lman Counc, lman
D~strmt I District II Distr~ct III
Given under my hand and Seal of the City of
Greenacres this 25th day of September, 2001.
Samu~J/~~rr~ri, Mayor
,//~ondra K. Hill, City Clerk
Theresa L. Whalen
Councilwoman
D~str~ct IV
Lorraine F Reynolds
Councilwoman
D~strmt V
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
i OR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
MANAGER
AGENDA ITEM # ff~ - REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/CARLSON BLACK SUBDM$ION PLAT
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is before the Commission to approve the final boundary plat for Carlson Black subdivision. The
project consists of a two-lot subdivision w~th an office building proposed on Lot 1 and a hotel
proposed on Lot 2. The property is located on the south side of West Atlantic Avenue just east of
Whately Road.
All technical and staff comments have been addressed and the plat is ready for approval.
Recommend approval of the final boundary plat for Carlson Black subdivision.
Ref.'Agmemol 0.FinalPlat. Carlson Black. 10.02.01
RECEIVED
SEP 2 5 2001
City Of Delray Beachc,w MAN,aEOn
Department of Environmental Services
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
David T. Harden, City Manager
Barron E. Caronite, PE, Assistant City Engineer
September 24, 2001
Carlson/Black Subdivision Plat
Please find attached an agenda request for Commission approval of the subdivision
plat of Carlson Black Plat. I have also enclosed a location map and a reduced copy of
the plat. The project consists of a two lot subdivision with an office building proposed on
Lot 1 and a hotel proposed on Lot 2. The property is located on the South Side of West
Atlantic Avenue just East of Whatley Road. If this meets with your approval, please
place it on the October 2, 2001 Commission meeting for Commission approval.
Encl.
File:
cc;
TAC:
S:lengadminltaclchambers medical office/agmemol00201doc
Randall Krejcarek, P.E., City Engineer
Dan Marfino, Planning/Zoning
Chambers Medical Office
.--
dVH NOLLYDO']
I
I
WEST A T L A N T I C A V E N U E
..... ,. ~.~. _., ........ ,
..... ~ , ~ ~ ~ , , { , . ...... ',. .... ~---,//~..-
. , ....
~ ~ , ~ , ' ,, ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ :~ ' ' '-
, ~._ :...~ ,,.... ...~, .. ,~.. :~
:: ~ C'~ of DELRAY BEACH CARLSON , BLACK PLAT
E~N~AL ~CE8 DEP~E~ LOCA~ ON MAP carlsonblackpIo~
~ ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2001-200
Agenda Item No. ~
Request to be placed on:
X Regular Agenda
Special Agenda
Workshop Agenda
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: Sept. 24, 2001
When: Oct. 2, 2001
Description of item (who, what, where, how much):Approval of the
Carlson/Black subdivison plat. Staff comments have been addressed.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of
Department head signature: _ _
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
the Carlson/Black
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of
funds):
Funding available: YES/NO
Funding alternatives (if applicable)
Account No. & Description
Account Balance
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda:
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
cc:
tac- Chambers Medical Office
file:s/engadmin/tac/ Chambers Medical Office /agl00201.doc
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
~ITY MANAGER
AGENDA ITEM # ~r~ - REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2. 2001
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/PARKSIDE TOWNHOME$
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is before the Commission to approve the final boundary plat for Parkside Townhomes. The
project consists of 165 garden apartments located north of West Atlantic Avenue and west of Coral
Trace Boulevard.
All technical and staff comments have been addressed and the plat is ready for approval.
Recommend approval of the final boundary plat for Parkside Townhomes.
RefiAgmemol 0.FinalPlatParksideTownhomes.10.02.01
RECEIVED
SEP 2 5 2001
City Of Delray Beach
Department of En vironmental Services
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
David T. Harden, City Manager
Barron E. Caronite, PE, Assistant City Engineer~~
September 24, 2001
Parkside Townhomes of Delray Boundary Plat
Please find an agenda request for Commission approval of the boundary plat for
Parkside Townhomes of Delray attached. I have also enclosed a location map and a
reduced copy of the plat. The project consists of 165 garden apartments. The site is
located North of West Atlantic Avenue and West of Coral Trace Boulevard. If this meets
with your approval, please place it on the October 2, 2001 Commission meeting for
Commission approval.
Encl
File:
cc'
TAC:
S:/engadmin/tac/Parkside Townhomes/agmemo100201 doc
Randall Krejcarek, P.E., City Engineer
Dan Marfino, Planning/Zoning
Parks~de Townhomes
z~°o
z~~
~o
1111t111
,,1
It
II
Z 'ON zVN~,O ~70~?
I
I
I
I
I
mmlmmmmlmmmmlm mm mmm mmm
i
I
----t--
I
.oo oz ,oo o~ .~o
/
, -.- .~ -. ~ ~ .- . ,, ~ , , ~ ,~,
~ ~ Cl~ of DELRAY BEACH LOCA~ON MAP DA~.7-31-01
E~~AL 8E~CE8 DEP~E~ PARKSIDE TOWNHOUES AT DELRAY PmKSDE
~ ~ ~ A~ ~Y ~ ~ ~ PLAT
Agenda Item No. ~
Request to be placed on:
Regular Agenda
Special Agenda
Workshop Agenda
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: Sept. 24, 2001
When: Oct. 2, 2001
Description of item (who, what, where, how
Boundary Plat of Parkside Townhomes of Delra¥.
addressed.
much):Approval of the
Staff comments have been
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED:
YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO
Recommendation: Staff recomm~,~ds approval of the
Parkside Townhomes of Delra¥. /~.~~ ~_~~
Department head signature:
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
Boundary Plat of
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of
funds):
Funding available: YES/NO
Funding alternatives (if applicable)
Account No. & Description
Account Balance
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda:
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
cc:
tac- Parkside Townhomes
file:s/engadmin/tac/Parkside Townhomes/agl00201.doc
[lTV OF DELRIIV BEII[H
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
1993
200 NW 1st AVENUE · DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444
TELEPHONE 561/243-7090 · FACSIMILE 561/278-4755
MEMORANDUM
Writer's D~rect L~ne' 561/243-7091
DATE: September 18, 2001
TO: City Commission
FROM: Susan A. Ruby, City Attomey
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement
Pertaining to the Grant Application
with the Library Association
The City Commission approved an Agreement on March 19, 2001 concerning the
application for a grant for the construction of a new public library facility. That Agreement
per the Library Association's request is hereby amended to modify Paragraph 3, of the
original agreement by adding phrases, delineating that the Association shall be solely
responsible for the design and construction of the new library and selection of design
professionals and contractors. This amendment seeks to expressly state and clarify what
was intended in the original agreement.
By copy of this memo to David Harden, please place this Amendment on the City,
Commission consent agenda for October 2, 2001.
Please call if you have any questions
SAR:ci
Attachment
cc: David Harden, City Manager
Barbara Garito, City Clerk
John Callahan, Library Director
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH AND
DELRAY BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION~ INC.
THIS AMENDMENT No. 1 to the agreement approved by the City Commission
on March 19, 2001 between the CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ("City") and the DELRAY
BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, INC., (the "Association")is made this
day of ,2001.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City and the Association entered into an agreement which was
approved by the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida on March 19,
2001 relating to the construction of the new public library; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend Paragraph 3, "All Other Requirements"
of the original agreement to clarify that the Association is responsible for the design
and construction of the new public library and the selection of design professionals and
contractors.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto in consideration of the covenants
contained agree as follows:
1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated as if fully
set forth herein.
2. Modification. Paragraph 3, "All Other Requirements" of the original
agreement is modified as follows:
3. All Other Requirements. The Association shall be solely
responsible for the design and construction of the new public library facility. The
Association shall be responsible for the selection of design professionals and
contractors. The Association, by execution of this Agreement, agrees to be
bound by this Agreement and by all terms and conditions of the Grant
Agreement, design contracts, construction contracts, and any other related
agreements pertaining to the construction of a new library facility, whether
express or implied, and shall comply and fulfill all of the obligations and duties
required of the City under the aforesaid agreements or any other agreement not
mentioned herein pertaining to the new library construction project, whether
financial, administrative or otherwise, and the Association shall provide proof of
discharge of all obligations and duties under the agreements, as though the
Association had been in the place and stead of the City of Delray Beach
throughout the completion of the building project, through and including the final
inspection thereof and shall secure the release from the State of Florida, Division
of Library Services and shall release all financial and inspection records after
final audit and program review. The Association shall be responsible for all
obligations and duties that may remain under the Agreements after the
completion of the building as set forth above.
3. Entire Aqreement. The Agreement, as clarified and amended as
Amendment No. 1, consist of the entire contract between the parties. No other
covenants not contained in the original agreement and this amendment, oral or written,
express or implied, are binding on the parties. The original agreement is modified only
by the express terms stated herein. All other terms of the original agreement are
binding on the parties except as expressly modified herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed on the date written above.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
a Florida municipal corporation
By:
David W. Schmidt, Mayor
City Attorney
DELRAY BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY
ASSOClA~TION, IN~,. <
· · g , PCsident
STATE OF ~'~-P-.,r~ ~
COUNTY OF CAt. ~ t~g'AC..H
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of
$c~T- ,2001 by 0,~ '~ - ,
corporation, on behalf of the corporation. H~/~ is personally known to me~
.... (as-identification. C,
Signature of Notary Public
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
ITY MANAGER
AGENDA ITEM ~'/-fl- - REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
RATIFICATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER
DATE:
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD ACTIONS
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is before the City Commission to ratify the actions taken by the South Central Regional Wastewater
Treatment and Disposal Board at their Quarterly Annual Meeting on September 19, 2001. By a vote of 8
to 0, the SCRWTD Board approved the following:
Approve to expend $36,000 on an emergency basis from Repair & Replacement fund to replace both
emergency generator radiator cores. The radiator cores are 10-years old and, due to corrosive
atmosphere, leaks have developed in the core tubing requiring costly repairs. New core material
upgraded thus reducing repairs. During FP&L power outages, these radiators must be in sermce for
generators to operate.
· Authorization to enter into an agreement with Palm Beach County Utilities in the amount of $47,364
for perfonmng lab testing services for fiscal year 2001-02 with the option to renew for an additional
two years subject to final review by the Board Attorney.
· Authorization to enter into contract with Widell, Inc. in the amount of $1,805,000 for constructton of
the sludge dewatering project.
· Authorization to expend an additional $428,950 from Repair & Replacement fund to supplement the
$1.8 million appropriated in 2000/01 budget to cover construction contract costs and other associated
costs to complete the sludge &watering project.
· Authorization for acceptance of a revised 2001/02 Organizational Chart.
Recommend ratification of the actions approved by the SCRWTD Board on September 19, 2001.
BOARD
City Council Members of
Boynton Beach & Delray Beach
SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD
1801 North Congress Avenue · Delray Beach, Florida 33445
Telephone
(561) 272-7061 (561) 734-2577
Fax: (561) 265-2357
E-ma~l: scrwwtp@ix.netcora cora
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FBOM:
DATE:
RE:
Nilza Madden, City Clerk's Office,
City OF Delray Beach
Mary Ann Shumilla ~'
September 21, 2001
RATIFICATIONS FOR SIGNATURE
Attached are Ratifications from the Special Meeting of September 19, 2001 which
require signatures. Would you place these on the Agenda for your next Commission
meeting.
Would you contact me at 272-7061 when the Ratifications are executed.
Thank you.
RATIFICATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD
ACTION OF SEPTEMBER 19, 2001
WHEREAS, the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board did
on September 19, 2001, by a vote of 8-0, approve TO EXPEND $36,000 ON AN
EMERGENCY BASIS FROM REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND TO REPLACE BOTH
EMERGENCY GENERATOR RADIATOR CORES. RADIATOR CORES ARE (10)YEARS
OLD AND DUE TO CORROSIVE ATMOSPHERE LEAKS HAVE DEVELOPED IN CORE
TUBING REQUIRING COSTLY REPAIRS. NEW CORE MATERIAL UPGRADED THUS
REDUCING REPAIRS. DURING FPL POWER OUTAGES, THESE RADIATORS MUST BE
IN SERVICE FOR GENERATORS TO OPERATE.
WHEREAS, said Board ~ction requires ratification by the City of Boynton Beach and
the City of Delray Beach.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Boynton and the City of Delray Beach hereby ratify
said Board action independently.
The above action is hereby ratified in open session by the City of Delray
Beach this __ day of , , by a vote.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
.By:
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Approve as to form:
City Attorney
RATIFICATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD
ACTION OF SEPTEMBER 19, 2001
WHEREAS, the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board did
on July 19, 2001, by a vote of 8-0, approve AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY UTILITIES IN THE AMOUNT OF $47,364
FOR PERFORMING LAB TESTING SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 - 2002 WITH
OPTION TO RENEW FOR ADDITIONAL (2) TWO YEARS SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW
BY BOARD ATTORNEY.
WHEREAS, said Board action requires ratification by the City of Boynton Beach and
the City of Delray Beach.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Boynton and the City of Delray Beach hereby ratify
said Board action independently.
The above action is hereby ratified in open session by the City of Delray
Beach this __ day of , , by a vote.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
By:
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Approve as to form:
City Attorney
RATIFICATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD
ACTION OF SEPTEMBER 19, 2001
WHEREAS, the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board did
on September 19, 2001, by a vote of 8-0, approve AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER
INTO CONTRACT WITH WIDELL, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,805,000. FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF SLUDGE DEWATERING PROJECT.
WHEREAS, said Board action requires ratification by the City of Boynton Beach and
the City of Delray Beach.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Boynton and the City of Delray Beach hereby ratify
said Board action independently.
The above action is hereby ratified in open session by the City of Delray
Beach this ~ day of , , by a vote.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
By:
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Approve as to form:
City Attorney
RATIFICATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD
ACTION OF SEPTEMBER 19, 2001
WHEREAS, the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board did
on September 19, 2001, by a vote of 8-0, approve AUTHORIZATION TO EXPEND
AN ADDITIONAL $428,950.00 FROM REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND TO
SUPPLEMENT THE $1.8 MILLION APPROPRIATED IN 2000/2001 BUDGET TO COVER
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT COSTS AND OTHER ASSOCIATED COSTS TO
COMPLETE THE SLUDGE DEWATERING PROJECT.
WHEREAS, said Board action requires ratification by the City of Boynton Beach and
the City of Delray Beach.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Boynton and the City of Delray Beach hereby ratify
said Board action independently.
The above action is hereby ratified in open session by the City of Delray
Beach this __ day of , , by a vote.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
By:
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Approve as to form:
City Attorney
RATIFICATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD
ACTION OF SEPTEMBER 19, 2001
WHEREAS, the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board did
on September 19, 2001, by a vote of 8-0, approve AUTHORIZATION FOR
ACCEPTANCE OF A REVISED 2001/2002 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART.
WHEREAS, said Board action requires ratification by the City of Boynton Beach and
the City of Delray Beach.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Boynton and the City of Delray Beach hereby ratify
said Board action independently.
The above action is hereby ratified in open session by the City of Delray
Beach this __ day of ' , , by a vote.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
By:
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
.Approve as to form:
City Attorney
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
CITY MANAGER~
AGENDA ITEM ~'~ - REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
CONSULTING AGREEMENT RENEWAL/LANGTON ASSOCIATES,
INC.
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is before the Commission for renewal of the consulting agreement with Langton Associates, Inc.,
to provide grant-writing services for one year beginning November 1, 2001 and ending October 31,
2002.
Commission approved the original contract on November 7, 2000. The agreement provides for
payment of $62,500.00 in equal installments over a 12-month period and may be terminated without
cause upon giving 30 days notice. If terminated, the City is only responsible to pay up to the
termination date. These terms are the same as were previously approved. The agreement has been
reviewed by the City Attorney.
Recommend approval of the consulting agreement renewal with Langton Associates, Inc. for a period
of one year.
RefiAgmemol 1 .Consulting Agreement LanK, on. 10.02.01
'F'R'OI,1 :'.LF~III_STOII ~':-,SO,:I~TES PHOIIE I10. : 904 3137 3'~S4 Sep. 2~ 2001
CONSUl 'FING AGREEMENT
This consulting agreement made on this day of November, by and bet~veen Langton Associntes,
Inc., hereinafter refea-ced to as "Langton", and City of Delray Beach, hereinafter referred to as
"Client" under the following terms and conditions:
1. Lsngton agrees to proxdde professional consulting services to Client for the term of 12 months,
conm~encing November 1,2001~ and ending October 31, 2002. Langton agrees to exercise its best
efforts to obtain govenamental grants and benefits for client. It is understood, however, that Langton
cannot guarantee results that any certain amount of ftmds v, ill be obtained for Client
2. Pursuant to this agreement I.angton agrees to provide specific services as follows:
B
C
D
E.
F.
Strategic Grants Plan based on a comprehensive needs assessment;
Strategic Grants Plan Workshop before the City Council;
Determination of funding som'ces that meet the Client's needs and their availabilib,;
Preparation and submission of ail grant applications;
Teclmical Assistance on all grants to all deparm~ents; and
Intergovernmental Relations xvith Federal and State Governments.
3 In exchange for Langton performing these services as established herein and devoting agency
time. Client agrees to pay Langton the sum of $62,500 to be paid in twelve (1 '2_~ equal installments
of $5,20g 33 pel month Client aga'ees that payment herein shall be made monthly by the 10th day
of the following month after the hwoice rendered by Langton.
4. Langton agrees to devote the necessary time and performance of duties for Client, m~d shall report
to the C~ty or its designee on all matters concerning this agreement and the discharge ofit~ scope of
services, haasmuch as the professional services rendered are of a subjective nature subject to
differences of opinion, mutual confidence and respect are necessary. Accordingly, this contract can
be ~ermmated by either party without cause upon giving of a thirty (30) day notice as follows:
As to Langton:
4244 St. Johns Avenue
Jacksonville, Flor/da 32210
Bo
As to City of Debay Beach:
David Harden
City Manager
100 N.W. 1~ Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444-2698
°FF,'01'I -: LHIIGT011 H'_:,'_:,I:I,:]RTE'~, PH011E Il0. : 904 '387 '~:3~4 SeF,. 26 2~01 10:571Zll'l F"3
In the e~,ent of a contract teaxnination, Client's responsible Io pay Langton fees and e×pen~es x~Sl] be
hmited to the period up to the termination date. All ,~ork products prepared by Langton in behalf
of the ('lien! ',,,'ill be determined to be Client property.
5. Client agrees to pay all the expenses of Langton in conjunction with his ser~-ices directly relathxg
to Client. This shall inclnde, but not be limited to, travel expenses (other than between Jacksonville
mxd Client), which slxall be air expense on coach flights, car rental, hotel (at commercial rates}, and
food (maximum of $25.00 per day)_ Lang~on v-ill submit fl~e/nvoice for these expenses which shall
be paid together with the salmy by thc next month. If desircd, Client can reqtfire a prior approval
for travel expenses to be incurro, t by Lmagton. If Client so desires, such request shall be made in
writing separate fi'om this agreement. The notice shall require Langton'to notify Cliem fifteen ~ 15)
dax's m advance of necessary travel expenses, unless said time is x~,aived in a particular case.
6 Extension of Agreemenf. This Agreement may be ex'lende<l on an optional basis at the end of the
~erm for two ~2). one ( 1 ) year l>.-riods upon mutual agreement of the pm'ties.
WHERETO, the proxies have set their hands and seal effective this da)' of November, 2001.
ATTEST'
LANOTON ASSOCIATES, INC.
By:.
Michael Langton, President
ATTEST-
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
By:.
David Harden, City Manager
Approved as to Form:
DAIE:
m
[lTV OF DELRI:I¥ BEI1[H
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
200 NW 1st AVENUE · DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444
TELEPHONE 561/243-7090 · FACSIMILE 561/278-4755
1993
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
June 29, 2001
David Harden, City Manager
Susan A. Ruby, City Attorney
Langton Associates - Consulting Associates
Writer's D~rect Line 561/243-7091
I received the attached memo from Nilza Madden in the City Clerk's office.
forwarding it to you to see if you wish to extend this contract.
Thank you.
SAR:ci
I alTl
Attachment
Interoffice Memo
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
06-27-01
Susan Ruby, City Attorney
Nilza Madden, City Clerk's
Langton Associates-Consulting Agreement
Our records show that the above mentioned agreement will expire on
October 31, 2001. Please make a note of it.
Thank you,
Dear Nilza,
[] This agreement has already been renewed on
[~ This agreement does not need to be renewed.
[--] This agreement will be reviewed by City Commission on
Cc: Becky O'Connor, Finance
Attachments
U/Memo2000/Reminder
nm
CONSULTING AGREEMENT
This consulting a~reement made on this~g7~day of November, by and between Langton Associates,
Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Langton", and City of Delray Beach, hereinafter referred to as
"Client" under thc following terms and conditions:
RECITALS
1. Langton agrees to provide professional consulting services to Client for the term of 12 months,
commencing November l, 2000, and ending October 3 l, 2001. Langton agrees to exercise its best
efforts to obtain governmental grants and benefits for client. It is understood, however, that Langton
cannot guarantee results that any certain amount of funds will be obtained for Client.
2. Pursuant to this agreement Langton agrees to provide specific services as follows:
Ao
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Strategic Grants Plan based on a comprehensive needs assessment;
Strategic Grants Plan Workshop before the City Council;
Determination of funding sources that meet the Client's needs and their availability;
Preparation and submission of all grant applications;
Technical Assistance on all grants to all departments; and
Intergovernmental Relations with Federal and State Governments.
3. In exchange for Langton performing these services as established herein and devoting agency
time, Client agrees to pay Langton the sum of $62,500 to be paid in twelve (12) equal installments
of $5,208.33 per month. Client agrees that payment herein shall be made monthly by the 10th day
of the following month after the invoice rendered by Langton.
4. Langton agrees to devote the necessary time and performance of duties for Client, and shall report
to the City or its designee on all matters concerning this agreement and the discharge of its scope of
services. Inasmuch as the professional services rendered are of a subjective nature subject to
differences of opinion, mutual confidence and respect are necessary. Accordingly, this contract can
be terminated by either party without cause upon giving of a thirty (30) day notice as follows:
Ao
As to Langton:
4244 St. Johns Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32210
As to City of Delray Beach:
David Harden
City Manager
100 N.W.- 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444-2698
In the event of a contract termination, Client's responsible to pay Langton fees and expenses will be
limited to the period up to the termination date. All work products prepared by Langton in behalf
of the Client will be determined to be Client property.
5. Client agrees to pay all the expenses of Langton in conjunction with his services directly relating
to Client. This shall include, but not be limited to, travel expenses (other than between Jacksonville
and Client), which shall be air expense on coach flights, car rental, hotel (at commercial rates), and
food (maximum of $25.00 per day). Langton will submit the invoice for these expenses which shall
be paid together with the salary by the next month. If desired, Client can require a prior approval
for travel expenses to be incurred by Langton. If Client so desires, such request shall be made in
writing separate from this agreement. The notice shall require Langton to notify Client fifteen (15)
days in advance of necessary travel expenses, unless said time is waived in a particular case.
6. Ex[ension of Agreement. This Agreement may be extended on an optional basis at the end of the
term for two (2), one (1) year periods upon mutual agreement of the parties.
WHERETO, the parties have set their hands and seal effective this ,~ 7 day of November, 2000.
ATTEST:
D
LANGTON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Michael L~figtonC/~resiclent
ATTEST:
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
By: ~'~'~' ~
David Harden, City Manager
Approved as to Form:
DATE: //t/~ ~'~O
LANGTON
Associates
February 6, 2001
Mr. David T. Harden
City Manager
100 N.W. 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Dear David:
Thank you for your letter of January 25 inquiring as to Langton Associates assisting local
non-profits in seeking grant funds.
It is generally our policy that we will assist our clients with grant projects that have been
identified either in the needs assessment or by the Council or City Manager as important
city priorities. Sometimes these grant projects include partnerships with non-profit
organizations. As long as it is a city need that is being addressed we consider these
projects to be within the scope of our contract.
As we discussed at one of our first meetings, Langton Associates has had or has current
contractual relationships with non-profit organizations in Delray Beach. While these
organizations in many cases are partially funded by the City, these non-profits pay us
directly out of their limited funds for grant writing services.
We would be happy to assist WARC and any other non-profit with grant projects that are
City priorities at your direction. We have learned over time that it is important for our
client to act as a gate keeper in these situations. However, to maintain a sense of fairness
to ou,'. other clients in Delray, ,,,-nl,ot~v~_j_~ ........ that are ~nt cleterrnined by. yo-~_ to be citv..r~rinrit/-es
would be considered outside the scope of our contract. Those services would require a
contract amendment and an additional fee.
I hope this information will assist you in establishing a consistent guideline in handling
non-profit requests.
S~. ~ r~ely,
Lisa King
Vice President
4244 St Johns Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32210 · (904) 387-3342 * (904) 387-3364 FAX · melangton@aol corn
~F'QH :'LAIIGTOII A'~,'E,L¥IATES PHOIIE I10. : '~_f14 387' 33E,4 S~F'. 2~, 2'001 lO:SE, AH F'I
LANGTON
A $ · o c ~ o I o ~.
4244 St. Johns Avenue
Jacksonville, FL 32210
Phone: (904) 387-3342
Fax: (904) 387-3364
To:
Fronl:
Fax #:
Dale.
Mike Langton
Lisa King
Sandy FaralQ~oniquc
Elton
Pages
(including cover sheet):
Comments:
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
~CITY MANAGER
AGENDA ITEM #~/'t~- REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
A(}REEMENT MUNICIPAL TAX CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is before the Commission to approve and agreement between the City and Municipal Tax
Consulting & Management for the recovery of sales taxes that we may have paid to contractors for
construction contracts. The cost to the City would be 33.33% of any funds recovered. If no funds
are recovered, however, there would be no cost to the City. This is a contingency fee contract with a
"sole sottrce" vendor.
This agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
Recommend approval of the agreement with Municipal Tax Consulting & Management.
Ref:AGMEMO10.Mumc~pal Tax Consulting 10.02.01
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
AND MUNICIPAL TAX CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT
AN AGREEMENT is made this day of ,200__, by
and between the CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, a Florida municipal
corporation, (the "City") and MUNICIPAL TAX CONSULTING AND MANAGEMENT, a
Division of Tax Research & Recovery Inc. ("Consultant").
WiTNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant desire to enter into an agreement to collect
and recover taxes due the City; and
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant understand that the focus will be on
recoveries of sales and use taxes; and
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant's research and representations indicate
that the firm is a sole source provider in Florida for this work.
NOW, THEREFORE, for the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties
~gree as follows:
1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated as if fully
set forth herein.
2. Term. The term of this Agreement is for one year commencing on
October 1, 2001 and ending on September 30, 2002 unless terminated earlier as
provided herein. The City and Consultant may renew this Agreement for additional
one-year periods upon executing written extensions.
3. Duties of the Consultant. The Consultant shall recover sales and use
taxes that were paid by and due the City. The Consultant shall file for the tax
recoveries for all previous years and through the end of this Agreement.
4. Duties of the City. The City shall pay one third of the taxes recovered by
Consultant with in ten business days of the City's receipt of the tax monies, if the tax
filing results in recovery refunds and checks payable to the City. If the City does not
receive a recovery, no fee will be charged by or due Consultant.
5. Confidentiality. The City, to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes
Chapter 119 and other applicable laws, rules and regulations, shall keep confidential
information on Consultant's methodology, content and concepts resulting in tax
recoverys; provided, however, if the Public Records Law requires disclosure, the
Consultant understands the City will disclose the information in accordance with the
law.
6. Termination. The City and Consultant may terminate this Agreement
with or without cause by notifying in writing to the other party five (5) business days in
advance of the termination. All tax recoveries filed before the date on the notice of
termination shall be paid in accordance with this Agreement.
7. Laws; Venue. Any claim, dispute or litigation arising out of this Agreement
will be decided under the laws of the State of Florida with venue in Palm Beach County,
Florida.
8. Indemnification. Consultant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the
City of Delray Beach, its officers, agents and employees for all claims, disputes and
litigation and all costs incurred by the City, including attorneys fees which result from the
acts or omissions of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.
9. Any notices submitted or required by this Agreement shall be sent by
registered or certified mail and addressed to the parties as follows:
To the City: David Harden, City Manager
City of Delray Beach
100 N.W. 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
To Consultant: Edgar Inglis, President;
Mun~.cipal Tax consulting
1728 Maln st;reet;
Coltmtbia, SC 29201
or to such other addresses as either party may designate in writing.
10. Entire Aqreement; Modification. This is the entire agreement between the
parties. The written representations set forth in Exhibit "A" are incorporated herein.
Other representations oral or written not set forth herein are not binding on the parties.
All modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
a Florida municipal corporation
ATTEST: By:
David W. Schmidt, Mayor
City Clerk
A roved asto Form:
City ,~orne~ '
ATTEST:
MUNICIPAL TAX CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT
a division of Tax Research & Recovery, Inc.
By:.
Print Name:
Title:
C, ONS UL FING
RECOVERING HIDDEN TAXES
N.kTION-WIDE SINCE 1994
pa~ ~'i mumc~pai~t,e~ r~ases O~er 95% at our existing 1,100 cl~n~ stated in the in,Iai imer-
wew they were cot ,ncaa ~ could not benefit them, Our se~t~es have already return~
~ to th.sa same cliems Why~ Becaus~ ~r ~e~ce ss ~ flee a~ we are the ~ly
tA%at aDou? taxes collected by s afl such as
property.' and income tax?
Any taxes carr~ntly reCovere~ by your Shaft mun4c,oal ~3gue or other age-ts ar~ expl~oliy exe~l~:y~c:
from yOUr COnlraC! wlI~' uS
Vv'hv are wc the sole source vendor?
a~dd r s~Div -~ nnoI creal~ 3 reveoue an~ ibc~ re~a;n ,nde~en~ m Ce~,ng the ~m-
~,, ~3r ~SOc',~l~or :~.{~5 ~ nol BIIC' ~' ~lLOtne~, ~c recover any pre.lO
XA'hv is this proposaJ risk-free?
recavermng :3xe~ paJ~ Dy enou5 ~enc~s We hav~ ~ a~nce to pm~ ~e tax a~unls ~n
$enl d~tec;I/~0 ~ g,/~ -jr -or recer~ ~ '~C'.v~, 7.~L dC not p~y U5 We ~ nOl
n3t odhr,~ ~11~c~ VOb~0 1',.31'~ 3 ~em~doa~ :os; ~o ~o. ~lh no guarant~ of any re~ve~
YVhat is the szaff time required?
i.~, /tJU I.
CITY ~ DI~IJ~Y BEIq(~ 4~T ~ ~ t2 'iai l.tl:::r4
~,en~ t~gh vagus subsm,a~es Mun,~l Tax C~sulbn9 a~ ~~nt ~s t~ s~ ~t~ tn ~
~o~es tot mun~opahbes ~ ot~r ~m~nt 8~ n~.p~ age~as. The fi~ has mlle~ ~te~l ~ a~
nu~o~ ou~Ue consu(tants to re~a~ P~eral s~ele and ~al ~s ~ete~,ag mc~ op~~ ~
oros~ ~ve~ent chen~ Eaaq s~m ~s d~ffef~t c~es a~ ~ch ar~pe~ ~t ~s d~t ~
~a~enst~ No other l~ nas ~n'~t~ ~ brae ~ f~ar~ a~ ~u~ ~~ ~A~ ~ ~ ~e ~~
~ p~nt The~ factors V,c~te tMal we offer the vacua se~& On a ~t ~n~t~l ~S a~ ~ e~nd ~
~q m ~u~te o~ p~pe~ve clen~ as to ~se o~nmes. ~r 95% of ~ ex~b~ LI~ den~ ~t~ m ~e
mi~al mt~ew t~ we~ con~n~ ~e ~ ~k ~fit ~m ~r ~ ~a~ ~m~y r~ ~r ~.~.~.~
Technology:
Tax Researr.~ and Recovery Inc ha~. ~nvaslecl conrdaerable resources in ~e tec:tmotogles reQuire~ to efllcien~ly recov-
er taxes ancl fees parc' Dy ant' aue to ~ur dmn~ We ~ave developed a custom alaLabar, e manageme~ ~fs/em wire b~e
as.~stance of out. aa 'consultants We have the oracedure$ and analysis tools to quickly de~ermrne ~ mosf valuable
of the Ol3t3ortunltes we offer to each pa~ctdar cJienL We men schedule the various recovery projects la maximize ~
refuna potenLials and minimIze Ihe effecls olr tt~e stature of hmltarions Ti-ds schedUJllig s~m ,~aC~lta~ ~3e ciVil:Jan!
utfllzatk3n of irtternai staff as well as acllunCl staff and subCont.,aCtor staff on an 'as needed' baas, Our on-sRo dam col
Iec'~mn system is unique to tn~s firm The system mctudes a vanety of techno/ocjies enabling l~e ral)d tnansfer of mas-
s~ve data streams to corporate staff analysts. This allows us to recover voluminous ~nformaaon ~ittmu~ ~sru~ ~
staff' of our el;ants
Staff:
Tax Research and Recovery Inc. (TR&R) rna~ntams a fixed staff of accountants arm adma'ustrative staff supewts~
a Director of Operahons Mana§emenr Th~S staff is augmented 0y an extenswe group of m. rtstde consuEen~s, artroom
and speCk3liS~s from the fie~cls o~ mx, ~aw anti operat~ont -.anagemen[ TR&R u~,:.ea fntenlal .,~8.ff aAd ex,mai con-
tract staff speclalisL5 to efficiently serve our clients by res=arching and developing recoeery teClll~ues capaOie of
~'efundsng many taxes and tees ale! were O~'eviousl¥ unobimnable in a cast effe~ive manner. The law linn of
Lea~hem,'ood Walker. TodM aha Mann empk)ys over 61t¥ attorneys and ~ prinapal contact Is a former memDe~
Unfree .States House of Representabve$ The Cem6ed Pubhc Accounling fan of Rol~mson Gram: and Com0any PR
pt~es annual tax aclvlsary ,5erwces. The C~qSulthqg firm o( Grog Shorey. Inc. provtdes operebons management
[ne gnnC~pai has success~l[y managed I~ree ex~remeh/successful businesses and h~s firm offers access to the ser~.
ices of :h~rty-e~ght Fotlune 500 sen~or level e~eo~,~e consultants
Founder and CEO:
Edgar In§Its 9raduate~ [rom the Um~er~ly of South Carolina ~ ~ ~ness
Adm~mslrat~n m 1978 and a~en~d ~e Unl~m~W of Vt~m~a Gmd~le ~1 of ~
~nd S~ence~ ~n ~s ~ I~hs ~aduated ~ n~s n~, 0~[~
al ~ely affiJiab~5 aha se~ vagus a~tatens in officer ~t~. ~ i~is
~ spent over ~n~ yea~ as [he ~a~, ac~un~ man.er g~eml ~r
and CEO o~ several ~ns a~ a ~mnal government ~.
History:
The ong~nal fl~m was ,mtially o~gentzed m Feerue~/of ~ 5.: ~ E~at ~ ~ offer ~ ~ ~ u~
~e ~xes Mr Ingbs ~s ~pl~ al ~a[ ~me as tn~ ~c~O~ Manor of a ,~at ~vem~ ~n~ ~
~g ~(er and waste wa~r ~m~es for res~en~ of ~o ~unaes ~ Sou~ Carolina Mr Inghs ~d ~n m~ ~0
~e~ em~oy~nl w~ a Staff engaged ~n exlen~e ~x a~yS,s and ~s a~m ct many a~ ~ ~~
T~ ~ter eno s~er agency n~e~ aOd[tmnal sour~s et ~unOs and Mt I~lm ~gan anay~ of va~ ~ ~ lo
a~ fha ~e~ reven~s ~ver~ tests ~me~ ~n ~t valu~ ~ wa~ant r~v~ afros. ~ ~
e~ r~u~r~ ~mnt~al quant~t~s of ~ff Oma and w~e ~ler ~~ to attest ~em ~ ~ o~ide
r~vew f~m o~ [c s~ff ti~ h~tat,ons
The fa~n engaoe~ to pedo~n I~e fmanoal aud~[ cOuld not =m~m au~ ~ ~ue ~ ~e ~u~ent ~[ ~~nt
~ ~c a~un~nts must m~m ~e~n~nt. NO o~r fl~ ~a~ ~ ex~flen~ ~ ~te ~ ~~
b~ ~ a nSk frae ~nan~n~ ba~s I; was qurte clear from ~ntemal ~aff ~ ex.need r~[ an ~s~e fi~ ~11~ on
a t~ aha materlaJ ~sis ~uJd e~ly ~a~e a T~ exc~ the value of ~e ~tlm re~e~. ~e ~es were
· en a~n~ as ~nleasJ~e
Ing6~ later resigned h~s posdmn to orgamze a firm to worl¢ on a nsk free b&.,s making these reCOVeries economi-
cally feasible Many ouls~de f-WTn$ and tt',div~dual$ were consulted to ~etefl'nine how besl to accoml;diSh ~ goal. The
Gnat prcx3uct ~s a nsk free :ontmgency fee bas].~ whereby the recovery ~S gad d~rectty to the client and Tax ReMarC_.h
Recover/lncor'aorated ~S neve~ pe,d unbl after the client ts Bald. The former county adrrun~strator who (~'esigne~
d~'laled Uqe contract sa~d 'Thfs t~ a no-brame~ for anyone. They s~mgly ~innol Ieee ' The firm .~'uls s~nee been
engagee e¥ over 1.100 munc~pahties and recovered over ~8.000 000.00 because we generate new revenue wi~ no
and use almost no che~t staff time
l
j L~ 1' ! ~,~. o (.)~, ~ Hi..
HIDDEN TAX AREAS-
ARE
,ak~e ~
You GETTING YOUR SHARE?
Billion
Billion
Billion
Billion
Bilhon
Use Tax -National Total
:F/'O Billion
$1~ Billion
810
U.S. Treasury Excise Tax Collection
l~&
19~7 lg~l lg~J
MUN'ICIP. xL T~x Ct)NSL'I.'i'iNf, & M.k\'AGE:XlEN'T
I t)~: /.... ,,I f,f~ I,'t.~./,.l' .' /'~..:',,'r. t-, ~
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: 09-21-01
Request to be placed on:
X Consent Agenda __ Special Agenda __ Workshop Agenda
When: 10-02-01
Description of agenda item: Approval of Agreement with Municipal Tax Consulting and
Management to recover sales taxes that we may have paid to contractors, etc., in our construction
contracts The cost to the City is 33.33% of any funds recovered. If no funds are recovered,
there is no charge for the service. This is a contingency fee contract from a "sole source" vendor.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED:
Draft of Resolution Attached:
YES NO
YES NO
Recommendation: Director of Finance recommends approval.
X
Department Head Signature: ~~, ~,~
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:" n/a ~'
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
and approved the Agreement as to legal sufficiency and form.
City Attorney has reviewed
Budget Director Review
(required on all items involving expenditure of funds):
Funding available: Yes
Funding alternatives (if applicable):
Account Number:
Account Description:
Account Balance:
City Manager Review:
Approved for Agenda: Yes
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action:
N/A--no cost to the City
Id ) Pr -~T'~' No
No
Approved'
P.O.#
Disapproved:
ADMINISTRATIVE SER¢ICES
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
David T. Harden, City Manager
r~Robert A. Baxcinski, Assistant
City
Manager
Agenda Item City Commission Meeting October 2, 2001
Approval License Agreement
DATE: September 27, 2001
Action
City Commission is requested to approve a license agreement between the City, the
Buckey Dent Baseball School, Inc. and the Toussaint L'Ouverture High School for Art
and Social Justice for the temporary use of the baseball school's facilities for the
Toussaint L'Ouverture High School for Art and Social Justice from 10/01/01 thru
12/31/01.
Baci~round
Attached are requests from the Buckey Dent Baseball School and The Toussaint
L'Ouverture High School for Art and Social Justice to authorize the use of the Baseball
Schools facilities on a temporary basis by the Charter school.
Attached is a license agreement prepared by the City Attorney. The agreement would
terminate no later than 12/31/01.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the license agreement between the City of Delray Beach,
the Buckey Dent Baseball School, Inc. and the Toussaint L'Ouverture High School for
Art and Social Justice.
~:ags
Cc: Joe Weldon, Parks and Recreation Director
Fflc u.allen/asmemos
Doc: Approval license agmt Toussaint
Toussaint L'Ouverture High School
for Arts and Social Justice
September 27, 2001
Mr. Bob Barcin,nki
~i~ city ~
City of Delray beth
50 ~ I~ A~o
Delray ~ ~
SEP 2 7 2001
The letter r~luests permission from the City of Delnty Beach for ~he Center for Eduction,
Training & Holistic Approaches, Inc., (d/b/a Toussaint L'Ouverture High Scllooi for Arts and
Social Justice) to enter into a short-term leane an'angement wi~ BDBBS, Inc. (d/b/a Bucky
Dent's Baseball School) during the estimated d~t~ of October 1, 2001, through ~ber 21,
2001.
The Toussaim L'Ouverture High School for Arts & Sodal Justice is a charter s~hool approvod
by the Palm Beach County School District. We serve 120 ninth and tenth lP'aders fn~n Delmy
Beach and surrounding communities, and we will be adding the eleventh and tw~l~ Ii,aries
over the next two years to serve a maximum of 350 students. We will follow'the san~e calendm'
as the Palm Beach County schools and will operate a school day of 8:15 until 3:15 PM ~
anticipate staff hours to be from 8 AM until 4 PM.
Our pemmmx building, located at 95 NE. 1n Av~., Delray Beach, is ~y under
r~novation and is expected to be ready for oc,ai~ by Deoember 1, 2001, or, at the lato~by
December 22, 2001. When the building is completed, we will relocate the school into that
facility.
Permission to utilize the BDBB5 facility at 490 Dolte~ Road will allow the ~chool ~
without interruption and provide top quality educational services to our communities. We
sincerely appreciate your consideration of this request and will be extre4nely grateful to the City
of Delray Beach for a~isting us in meeting the needs of area youth.
Sine. ely,
Diane Allerdyce, PI~D,
Chief Academe Officxr
Ch~efOp~
, Maj.
itions Officer
777 1~. Atlantic Ave · Suite Z #153
D¢lray Beach, FL 33483
www-tous'~amtlouverture, home~tead,com
TEL: (561) 243-3136
FAX: (561) 243-3878
E-Mail: ti faa~j ~ homeste, ad. com
490 Dotterel I-.'~
Delray Beach, ~ I.,
(561) 265-02 E,;
www, dentbaset,-,,d,,
,o.. the World's premier
B,Selrall School."
~,3444
· (56~,) 278-6679
September ~6, ~001
~¢~orandu~ To:
From;
Bob I~rcinski, Assistant City Manager
The City of bel~ay Beach
Larry ~Ce President & general Manager
Bucky~eht's Baseball School
BE)BBS, ]~nc ~nd The Falls of I:)elray (d/b/a Bucky Dent's Baseball School),
490 I::)otter~l Road, 13elray Beach, Florida, would like to ask the City of
I:)elray I~each permission to sub-lease our facFlity to the Touss(~int
L'Ouvertura Nigh School for Art & Social ,Tustice for two months, (with the
ap, ion of adding additional weeks in two week increments as needed). The
areas to be used during this Lease arrangement would be uni,s 302,303,
304, 305,201 202 and the arcade room (for an office) in our main
administration building.
Our facility is closed at thi~ time. The Charter School would operate daily
Monday-.F.-~dn¥ from 8:00 A.M.-3:00 P.M., until their new facility is ready.
Their sch¢+.~,.,., is exactly the s~me as the Palm Beach County School System.
Thank you ~n.-. your consideration tn this matter.
LH;cg
VZA FACSI/~. ~LE
LICENSE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BDBBS, INC.
AND TOUSSAINT L'OUVERTURE HIGH SCHOOL FOR ART AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT of August 3, 1983 is entered into this
of
BDBBS, Inc.,
day
,2001 between the CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA (the City),
(the Baseball School) and TOUSSAINT L'OUVERTURE HIGH SCHOOL
FOR ART AND SOCIAL JUSTICE (the Charter School).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City, and the Baseball School entered into a Lease Agreement
dated August, 1983, which has been amended from time to time; and,
WHEREAS, the Lease Agreement in Paragraph 8.01, provides Lessee shall not
transfer its rights without written consent of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City, by entering into this License Agreement consents to the
use of the premises or part thereof by the Charter School;
NOW, THEREFORE, by and in consideration of the mutual covenants,
stipulations, and agreements herein contained, the parties agree as follows:
1. Recitations. The recitations referred to above are hereby incorporated as if
fully set forth herein.
2. Term. The term of this License Agreement shall commence when the last
signatory signs this Agreement and shall terminate no later than December 31, 2001.
This term may not be extended without the written consent of the City and the Baseball
School.
3. Premises. The license granted herein is for the premises described in the
Lease Agreement between the City and the Baseball School, as amended, and as may
be amended by any further agreement between the Baseball School and the Charter
School.
4. Terms; Other Agreement. The Baseball School and the Charter School
may enter into a separate agreement detailing other terms and conditions of occupancy,
not in express conflict with this Agreement
5. Insurance. The Charter School shall provide the City with the same type
and amount of insurance required by the City of the Baseball School. The Charter
School shall name the City and the Baseball School as an additional insured on all
insurance policies provided for the use of the premises.
6. Hold Harmless Indemnification. The Charter School shall indemnify,
defend, and hold the City and Baseball School and its employees harmless from and
against any claims, causes of action, costs, charges, including attorney's fees, from
judgement or settlement which arises from injury to persons or property, which injury is
a consequence of the Charter School's use of the premises.
7. Assignment. The Charter School may not assign this License.
8. Termination. The License shall immediately terminate and be considered
void, if the Charter School becomes insolvent, and shall terminate upon thirty (30) days
prior written notice for improper use of the premises as determined by the City.
9. Full Force and Effect. The terms of the Lease Agreement between the
City and the Baseball School remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Delray Beach, BDBBS, Inc. and
Toussaint L'Ouverture High School for Art and Social Justice have executed this
License Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
2
WITNESSES:
Print Name:
BDBBS, Inc.:
By:
Print Name:
Print Name:
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
,2001, by (name of officer or agent,
title of officer or agent) of (name of corporation
acknowledging), a (state or place of incorporation) corporation, on
behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced
(type of identification) as identification.
Signature of Notary Public - State
of Florida
WITNESSES:
Toussaint L'Ouverture High School
for Art and Social Justice
By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Title:
Print Name:
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument
,2001, by
title of officer or agent) of
acknowledging), a
was
acknowledged before me this day of
(name of officer or agent,
(name of corporation
(state or place of incorporation) corporation, on
3
behalf of the corporation.
He/She is personally known to me or has produced
(type of identification) as identification.
Signature of Notary Public - State
of Florida
ATTEST:
By:
City Clerk
Approved as to Form and
Legal Sufficiency:
By:
City Attorney
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
By:.
David W. Schmidt, Mayor
4
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
CITY MANAGER~
AI~ENDA ITEM ~'. ~' - REGUI. aMt MEETING OF OCTOBER 2. 2001
CONTRACT ADDITION (C.O. #1)/ROSSO PAVING & DRAINAGE
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is before the City Commission to approve a Contract Addition #1 in the total amount of
$56,186.70 with Rosso Paving & Drainage under the NW 18th Avenue Roadway Project. The
additional work involves the construction of a parking lot on Gleason Street across from the First
Presbyterian Church and at the Environmental Service complex to help alleviate the parking shortage.
Funding for the Gleason Street project estimated at $30,501.00 is available from 115-000-248-01.00
(parking in lieu of fee) and for the Environmental Service complex estimated at $25,685.70 from 442-
5178-536-63.90. Proposals were requested from two (2) contractors currently working for the City,
Sonic Engineering did not submit a propose due to their current workload and Chaz Equipment
submitted prices above those of Rosso Paving & Drainage.
Recommend approval of the Contract Addition #1 with Rosso Paving & Drainage in the total
amount of $56,186.70 for both projects.
RefiAgmemol 1.Contract Addition. Rosso Paving. 10.02.01
City Of Delray Beach
Department of Environmental Services
M E M 0 R A N D U M
www delrayesd, com
TO:
FROM:
DAVID HARDEN
Manager
;io; lA.
Deputy Director Confft~ction~'~
SUBJECT:
NW 18TM AVE IMPROVEMENTS, PN 00-44
Contract Addition for Environmental Services Parking Lot Addition (PN 01-44); and 1 st
Presbyterian Church Parking Lot, (PN 01-35)
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
Attached for Commission approval is an agenda request for a Contract Addition, C.O. #1 to
Rosso Paving and Drainage on the above referenced project. The scope includes the
construction of a parking lot on Gleason St across from the Presbyterian Church and at the
Environmental Services complex.
The Church parking lot is a modification/overlay of an existing lot to bring it up to current City
standards. The lot will be utilized by the Church and will also be available for public parking when
not used by the Church. This request is made as a Contract Addition in order that the work can
commence as soon as possible to be ready for the upcoming "season". The amount of the
proposal from Rosso for this work is $30,501.00. Two other proposals from contractors currently
working for the City were solicited. Chaz Equipment submitted a price of $47,630.00; and Sonic
Engineering, who did not submit a proposal due to their current heavy workload. The Engineers
estimate for the project is $37,070.00. Funding Source is from 115-000-248-01.00(Parking in
lieu of fee) for $30,501.00.
The Environmental Services Parking Lot will provide more parking for ESD Water/Sewer network.
This request is made as a Contract Addition to help alleviate the parking shortage at the ESD
complex. The amount of the proposal from Rosso for this work is $25,685.70. Two other
proposals from contractors currently working for the City were solicited. Chaz Equipment
submitted a price of $36,550.00; and Sonic Engineering, who did not submit a proposal due to
their current heavy workload. The Engineers estimate for the project is $31,980.00. Funding
Source is 442-5178-536-63.90 (Other Improvements) for $25,685.70 per the attached budget
transfer.
The total of the two projects/C.O. #1 is $56,186.70. A bid tabulation is attached for both projects.
cc:File 0044 (A)
S' lEng~dmmLProjects1200012000-O44iCONSTRCl~co l mern-0 50101 doc
~_~ .... '2-'2- 7'-~"~"7'~- ~ ;'r~-
I-'
,,, 0
~ -~ -~--~-.~- -~-. -~ ....
0 0 0 0 0 0
o '~' '~"~' '~- ~-'-~ ......
~ '~' -~- -~- ,~- .~-. -~ .....
........................
.~
~ 0 ~ ~
~. ON~ 'M'S
J~ ClTYofDELRAYBEACH.~a,i~~,~~c~,~~ ]J
II OA~,:O0-O0--O
TITLE 1 II
TITLE 2
TJ-rL_[ ~ II oo-ooo
Agenda Item No. ~'/-~-
Request to be placed on:
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: September 25, 2001
---X .... Regular Agenda
~ Special Agenda
~ Workshop Agenda
When: October 2, 2001
Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Attached for Commission approval is an
agenda request for a Contract Addition, C.O. #1 toRosso Paving and Drainage, Inc. on the NW
18th Ave Roadway Improvements project (PN 00-44). The scope includes the construction of a
parking lot on Gleason St across from the 1't Presbyterian Church for $30,501.00; and a parking
lot at the Environmental Services complex for $25,686.00.
Funding Source is 442-5178-536-63.90 (Other Improvements) for $25,685.70 per the attached
budget transfer; and from 115-000-248-01.0~I (Parking in lieu of fee) for $30,501.00.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED. Not required.
Recommendation: Staff recommends award of a Contract Addition (C. O. #1) to Rosso
Paving and Drainage, Inc.
Department head signature:
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation if applicable):
Budget Director Review (re~.q~ed on all items involving expenditure of funds):
Funding available. Y~..~NO
Funding alternatives (if applicable):
Account No. & Description ~-~5'/'-/~-~5-.3~- ~.~ ~'o- ~_~.-~,.~,~.//
Account Balance
City Manager Review: ,,2-h ~' ,~ ~' ~ " /" ~t ~'..z...~_~
ApprovedHold Until:f°r agenda: '~NO ~'/V1 "' '"" ~'/0',',3 ~/~/
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
s:~...\0043~agreq1122001
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
CITY MANAGER ~
AGENDA ITEM ~..~. - REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
SERVICE AUTHORIZATION #5/CH2M HILL (ANION EXCHANGE
PROJECT)
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is before the City Comrmssion to approve Service Authorization #5 with CH2M Hill in the
mount of $107,127.00, for professional engineering services in conjunction with the Anion Exchange
Pilot Testing and Preliminary Design at the Water Treat Plant. Sermces include pilot testing of the
Anion Exchange Treatment System, and 50% design drawings and permit requirement review. A
separate service authorization will follow for 100% design plans based on the results of the pilot
testing.
Funding is available from 442-5178-536-63.87 (Anion Exchange Project).
Recommend approval of Service Authorization #5 with CH2M Hill for the Anion Exchange Project.
Ref'Agmemol 6.SermceAuth.#5CH2M Hdl. Amon Exchange Project.10.02.2001
City Of Delray Beach
Department of Environmental Services
M E M 0 R A
N D U M
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
David T. Harden
City Manager
C. Danvers Beatty, P.E. ~
Deputy Director of Publie~ltih ~Xi~-
September 25, 2001
Anion Exchange Pilot Testing and Preliminary Design
Water Treatment Plant
Project Number 2000-013
RECEIVED
SEP 2 5 2001
CITY MANAGER
Attached is an Agenda Request for Service Authorization No. 5 to CH2MHILL for professional
engineering services related to the subject project. Services include pilot testing of Anion
Exchange Treatment System, 50% design drawings and permit requirement review. CH2MHILL
is unable to provide a scope for 100% design plans until the pilot testing phase is complete. At
that time we will execute a separate service authorization for 100% design and permitting. The
total amount of Service Authorization No. 5 is $107,127.00 and funding is available from Account
# 442-5178-536.63.87, Anion Exchange Project.
Please place this item on the October 2, 2001 Agenda for consideration by City Commission.
CC:
Richard C. Hasko, P.E., Director of Environmental Services
John Bullard, Manager of Water Treatment Plant
City Clerk
Agenda File
\~ESSRV002XDEPARTMENTSXEngAdm~n~Projects~2001 ~2001-013\OFFICIAL\Treatment Study doc
Service Authorization No. 5 to the
Agreement to Furnish Professional Services
Dated July 6, 1999, Between the City of Delray
Beach, Florida and CH2M HILL, Inc.
City P.O. Number: City Project Number
Title: Preliminary Design Services for Installation of an Anion Exchange Treatment System
Category of Work: Professional Enginesring Services- Study/Design
General
This SERVICE AUTHOI~IT.~,TION AMENDMENT shall modify the professional services
agreement referenced above and sb~ll become part of that AGREEMENT as if written there
in full. Changes in the indicated Scope of Services will be subject to renegotiation and
implemented through an Amendment to this agreement.
Introduction
The City of Delray Beach (CITY) completed an Alternative Water Supply and Treatment
Feasibility study in June 2001. The primary objective of this study was to identify a cost-
effective measure, either through alternative source water usage or treatment process
modification, to meet Stage 1 and Stage 2 Disinfection/Disinfectant By-Product (D/DBP)
requirements and reduce finished water color levels to less than 10 CU. The study assumed
that only Treatment Train 2, which receives raw water with the highest color levels, would
be modified, and the treated water from this train would be blended with treated water
from Treatment Train 1 to produce the Finished water for distn'bution.
Alternate source water blend ratios from the Morikami, Golf Course and 20-Series wellfields
as well as treatment process modifications utilizing ozone, membrane softening, and ion
exchange (MIEX® DOC System and anion exchange) were evaluated for their ability to
produce a blended finished water that met the primary objective. Use of alternate source
water blend ratios was unable to meet the primary objectives as was implementation of
ozone. Treatment modification with membrane softening, MIEX® DOC ion exchange, and
anion exchange all resulted in a blended finished water that met the primary objective of the
study. A cost/benefit analysis indicated that anion exchange and membrane softening were
the most feasible alternatives. Anion exchange was the least cost process. Membrane
softening was the highest cost but provided more long-term protection from future
regulated water quality constituents. After the CITY prepared its own analysis of the capital
expenditure requirements of the two recommended alternatives on rates and bonding
requirements, the CITY elected to proceed with the short-term solution of Anion Exchange.
This decision was based on the following:
· Membranes are much more expensive and required replacement of one lime softening
treatment train
· Anion-Exchange provides adequate treatment for the Stage 1 and Stage 2 D/DBP
requirements and is an "add-on" to the current lime softening treatment
· The current lime softening system is only 10 years only
In approximately 10 years, the City's lime softening treatment system will be approaching
it's useful life (i.e., 20-25 years) and would require replacement. At that time:
· Membrane technology will be more advanced and may have declined further in price
· The City would be looking at replacing the entire lime softening treatment facility
· Additional water quality regulations will probably be promulgated
· The City may consider looking at the Floridan aquifer as an alternative raw water
supply. Treatment of Floridan aquifer water will require membrane technology.
The CITY has requested CH2M HILL to prepare a scope of services to complete the
preliminary design and pilot testing of the anion exchange system. These tasks include pilot
testing of the anion exchange system to evaluate resin performance and regeneration
requirements, preparation of the 50% design plans, and investigation of the permits that will
be required for construction and operation of the anion exchange system, including permits
required for regenerant disposal. Completion of the design services and preparation of
applicable permits will be addressed under a separate task order.
Scope of Services
Task 1 - Anion Exclmnge System Pilot Testing
Because anion exchange data presented in the Alternative Water Supply and Treatment
Feasibility report was based on bench-scale testing, pilot scale testing of the anion exchange
system is required to determine performance on the City's water. It is anticipated that a
Thermax Tulsion A72-MP resin will be the only resin evaluated during the pilot testing. This
resin is recommended because of its performance in treating other South Florida waters.
Should this resin performance not meet the criteria needed to produce a final blended water
that meets Stage I and H D/DBP requirements and color levels of less than 10 CU, up to two
other applicable resins will be identified and pilot tested.
The full-scale anion exchange system will treat filtered water. Since anion exchange will
remove color, prechlorination for color control can be reduced or possibly discontinued in
order to meet future DBP reg~dztions. From a pilot testing perspective, current filtered
water will have lower color levels than filtered water without prechlorination. Since this
condition cannot be pilot tested without affecting the WTP's finished water quality, it is
proposed that two different pilot feed-waters be assessed to estimate the resin performance
during anticipated full-scale operation. Exl~it 1 shows the City's WTP process diagram
along with two proposed locations for pilot testing. Pilot testing on the raw water will
provide information on the color removal that can be expected under worst case conditions;
however, impurities and sulfates in the raw water will significantly shorten the operational
time between regeneration cycles. Pilot testing of filtered water will provide information
under best case conditions as the water will have the lowest color levels. By pilot testing the
anion exchange system on both the raw and filtered water, an approximation of the actual
color removal and resin regeneration requirements after prechlorination is discontinued can
be obtained. It is anticipated that pilot testing will be carried out on the raw water for a
period of two weeks. For this test, color measurements will be taken on a daily basis on the
influent to and effluent from the anion exchange pilot unit. Additiooally, total organic
carbon samples will be collected from the influent and effluent. It is anticipated that three
samples each (for influent and effluent) will be collected during a single operational cycle
(between regenerations).
Pilot testing of the filtered water will last for approximately one month to allow for
characterization of the resin through the regeneration cycle. Exh~it 2 outlines the
parameters of interest and the frequency of sample collection for this pilot test period.
EXHIBrr 2
Anion Exchange Pilot T~st~ Parameters and Frequency- filtered Water
Parameter Sample Location
Sample Frequency
Color
TOC
Turbidity
THM
THM form~ien potential
HAA formation potential
pH
Total dissolved solids
Alkalinity
Sodium
Chlorides
Influent to and effluent from
anion exchange unit
Influent to and effluent from
anion exchange unit
Influent to and effluent from
anion exchange unit
Influent to and effluent from
anion exchange unit
Inlluent to and effluent from
anion exchange unit
Influant to and effluent from
anion exc~u~}e unit
Influen! to ~ effluent from
anion exch~"~e
Inftuen! to and effluent from
anion exchange unit, regenerant
effluent
Influent and effluent from enion
exchange unit, regeneran!
effiuen!
Influent to and effluent from
anion exchange uni~, reganeranl
effluent
Influen! to ~d effluenl from
anion exchange unit, regeneran!
effluent
Influent to and effiuen! from
anion exchange unl~, regenerant
effluent
Three times per week
Three times per week
Once
Dai~ and immediately after regeneration
Three time~ per week and immediately after
regeneration
Immedlalely after regeneration
Immediately after regeneration
Immediately after regeneration
DF~gOlO40007t~"T561.~ 3
Sulfates
Effluent from anion exchange
unit, regenerant effluent
Metals Regenerant effluent
Three samples each during two operational
periods
Once (immediately after regeneration)
A pilot test technical memorandum will be prepared that documents the testing conducted,
results and recommendations. Information induded in the report will be used to develop
the 50% design described in Task 2. Three copies of the pilot test report will be submitted to
the CITY for review. Upon completion of the C1TY's review, CH2M HILL and the CITY will
meet to discuss the comments and agree on the final preliminary design criteria
requirements. CH2M HILL will incorporate the CITY's comments and revise the technical
memorandum. Five final copies will be submitted to the CITY.
Task 2 - Prepare of 50% Design Drawings
After the anion exchange system has been pilot tested and the data evaluated, 50% design
drawings will be prepared. No technical specifications will be provided with this submittal.
It is anticipated that the following sheets will be included in the deliverable:
G-1 Cover Sheet
G-2 Mechanical & Electrical Legends
A-1 Equipment Area Floor Plan
A-2 Equipment Area Elevations & SectionsM-1 W2~ Site Plan
M-2 Demolition Plan
M-3 Mechanical Plan Equipment Area
M-4 Anion Exchange System Schematic
D-1 Standard Del~il.g
E-1 Electrical Schematic
E-2 Elecixlcal Site Plan
E-3 Control Room Electrical Plan
E-5 Eleclxlcal
As the design is developed and the pilot testing completed, adch'tional drawings may be
required, however, the above represent the level of effort expect as part of the 50% design.
Five sets of 11' X 17" 50% design drawings will be provided to the City for review. Upon
completion of the CITY's review, CH2M HILL and the CITY will meet to discuss the
comments and agree on the final design requirements. Revisions to the preliminary design
will be incorporated into the final design upon authorization by the CITY of a separate task
order. It is estimated that 30-40 drawings will be required in the final design.
Task $ - Investigation of Permitting Requirements
Various permits will be required for the construction and operation of the anion exchange
system. It is anticipated that permits may be required from the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, South Florida Water Management District, Depaxtment of
Health, Palm Beach County, and the City of Delray Beach. The permitting requirements for
construction and operation (including disposal of the regenerant) for the anion exchange
system will be summarized in a Technical Memorandum, and copies of all required permit
applications will be obtained. Three copies of the Technical Memorandum will be
submitted to the CITY for review.
Upon completion of the CITY's review, CH2M HILL and the CITY will meet to discuss the
comments and agree on the final approach for permitting the Anion Exchange system.
CH2M HILL will incorporate the CITY's comments and revise the technical memorandum.
Five final copies will be submitted to the CITY.
Schedule
CH2M HILL will commence work on the Scope of Services described herein upon receipt of
a fully executed copy of this Specific Authorization from the City, which will serve as the
notice to proceed.
It is estimated that services described herein will be completed within 20 weeks from the
date of notice to proceed. If pilot testing of additional anion exchange resins is required, this
schedule may be extended appropriately. The following summarizes the proposed
schedule.
Task
Time of Completion (weeks from date of notice to proceed [NTP])
Slad Finlah
Task I - Anion Exchange System 4 weeks 14 weeks
Pilot Tasting
Task 2 - Prepare of 50% Design 6 weeks 20 weeks
Drawings
3 weeks 12 weeks
Task 3 - Investigation of Pen~itting
Requirements
Assumptions
This scope of services was based on the following assumptions:
· The pilot system will be operated 24 hours per day.
· CH2M HILL persortnel will operate the pilot plant. It is antidpated that site visits will
occur three times per week at 3 hours per visit.
· Filtered water will be av_ailable for use in lite regeneration component of the pilot
testing°
· Treated water from the pilot system will be disposed of into the sanitary sewer system.
· Regenerant water generated during the pilot testing will be captured and disposed of by
the vendor providing the pilot systerrc
· The prechlorination dosage can be lowered by the CITY to a point that the free available
chlorine present in the water after filtration is less than 1 mg/L.
OF~B61040(X)7/SET541 DOC 6
An outside laboratory will be used to analyze for parameters that cannot be measured
on-site (e.g., sodium, metals, TOC, THM, and HAA).
Technical specifications will not be included with the preliminary design drawings.
Obligations of the City
To successfully complete this scope of services, the following requirements of the City are
necessary:
· The City will provide access to the WTP during normal working hours to allow for set-
up, operation, testing, and removal of the pilot testing system.
· The City will instan all piping necessary to deliver the water for pilot testing to the pilot
test unit.
· The City will ensure that the required amounts of water are delivered to the anion
exchange pilot system on a continual basis.
Compensation to the CONSULTANT
Compensation for professional consulting engineering services as described herein is
estimated at $107,127. Compensation for services shall be lump sum in accordance with
Artide VII.A.1 of the AGREEMENT. Exl~it A attached presents a breakdown of the
estimated labor and expense charges per the Agreement.
This service authorization is approved contingent upon the City's acceptance of and
satisfaction with the completion of the services rendered in the previous phase or as
encompassed by the previous service authorization. If the City in its sole discretion is
unsatisfied with the services provided in the previous phase or service authorization, the
City may terminate the contract without incurring any further liability. The CONSULTANT
may not commence work on any service authorization approved by the City to be included
as part of the contract without a further notice to proceed.
Approved by:
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH:
Date:
David Schmidt
Mayor
Attest:.
Approved as to Legal Sufficiency and Form
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF BROWARD
The foregoing instrument was
acknowledged before me this 20th day of
September, 2001, by Tom McCormick, Vice
President and Area Manager, CH2M HILL,
Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the
corporation. He is persooally known to me
_Bobb Wfllcox ' '
Not~-y Public
Slate of Florida
(Seal)
OFBIM 1040007/~'TM1,00C 7
Exhibit A
Service Authorization No. 5
Pilot Testing and Preliminary Design Services for an
Anion Exchange Treatment System
Estimated Labor Hours
Cost per Task No. Total Pro~ect
Employer Category Grade Hour I 2 3 Hours Totals
9 $201.46 0 $0
8 $167.89 0 $0
7 $146.03 0 $01
Professionals - Engineers, Architects, 6 $142.77 4 6 2 12 $1,713'
Planners, Economists, Scientists, 5 $119.44 36 50 20 106 $12,661
Hydrologists, Hydrogeologists, Geologists, 4 $89.48 0 $0
etc. 3 $78.71 112 78 64 254 $19,992.
2 $68.57 60 52 112 $7,680
I $64.50' 0 $0
0 $61.01 0 $0
5 $89.35 , 0 $0
Technicians - Drafters, Graphic Artists, 4 $73.40 0 $0 I
Computer, Surveyors, Cartographics, 3 $57.75 260 260 $15,015;
Construction Inspectors, e~c. 2 $50.13; 0 $0
I $45.60: 0 $01
Office Support 0 $47.38 16 28 16 60 $2,843
Labor Subtotal $18,559 $32,875 $8,470 804 $59,904 ~
Reimbursable Expenses
Transportation $0~
Lodging $0,
Communication Charge $296 $816 $133 $1,045
Postage and ~ling $100 $25 $125
Field Equipment $864 $864
~r $1 ~060 .~,~ ?04 $474 $3,739
Auto Travel/Mileage (outside PBC) $350 $450, $100 $900
Subcontractors ~lu$10%) $15,500 24,750.00 $40,250
Experme~ Subtotal $18,071 $28,370 $782 $47~23
Project Total $36,629 $51 ~ $9~..52 $107,127
DFBAnlen Exch Per Diem Budget.xls
Request to be placed on:
X Regular Agenda
Special Agenda
__ Workshop Agenda
AGENDA REQUEST
Agenda Item No. J7 ~
Date: September 25, 2001
When: October 2, 2001
Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Staff requests Commission approval of Service
Authorization No. 5 to CH2MHILL for professional engineering services for pilot testing of Anion Exchange
Treatment System, 50% design drawings and permit requirement review. A separate service authorization will
follow for 100% design plans based on the results of the pilot testing. Total amount of Service Authorization No.
5 is $107,127.00 and funding is available from Account # 442-5178-536-63.87, Anion Exchange Project.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Service Authorization No. 5 for CH2MHILL in the amount of
$107,127.00.
Department head signature: ~ _C ·
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attomey Review/Recommendation (if applicable):.
Budget Director Review (retqfiW~ on all items involving expenditure of funds): Funding available ~,._YES~NO
~ Funding alternativ~-~ ~- (if applicable)
~ AccountNo. & Descri~pt~on ~qZ--~ ~ ~. ~-~3 ~i,3~ ~~
x Accost Bal~ce ~ ~ ~0 O
Ci~ M~ager Review: ~
Approved for ~enda:
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
\~ESSRV002'~DEPARTMENTSkEngAdmmWrojects~001 ~2001-013\OFFICIALL4,gendaReq - 11 ! 500 doc
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
~TY MANAGER
AGENDA ITEM ~ff' - REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
CONTRACT AWARD/EIMCO PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is before the City Commission to approve a contract award in the mount of $51,510.00 to
Eimco Process Equipment Company for the rehabilitation of Clarifier No. 4 at the Water Treatment
Plant. The award includes the purchase of equipment and labor necessary for the rehab/litat~on of the
mechanical components of Clarifier No. 4; this is a sole source provider of our equipment.
Our operational records indicated a continued increase Lq torque as well as excessive wear on the
bearings and other mechanical components of the clmfier, which demonstrate the need for
rehabilitation. Funding is available from 442-5178-536-64.90 (R&R Other Machinery and Equipment.
Recommend approval of the contract award to Eimco Process Equipment Company (sole source
provider) for the rehabilitatton of Clarifier No. 4.
RefiAgrnemol 1 Contract Award Enrico Process Eqmpment Company 10.02 01
City Of Delray Beach
Department of Environmental Services
M E M 0 R A N D
U M
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
David T. Harden
City Manager
Deputy Director of Ptrb/ic Utilities
September 24, 2001
Rehabilitation of Clarifier No. 4
Water Treatment Plant
RECEIVED
SEP 2 6 2001
CITY MANAGER
Attached is an Agenda Request, location map and a quote for rehabilitation of Clarifier No. 4 at
the Water Treatment Plant. Our operational records indicate a continued increase in torque as well
as excessive wear on the bearings and other mechanical components of the Clarifier, which
demonstrate the need for rehabilitation. Eimco Process Equipment Company is the sole source
provider of our equipment. The total amount of this work is $51,510.00 and funding will be
available from R&R Account # 442-5178-536-64.90, Other Machinery and Equipment.
Please place this item on the October 2, 2001 Agenda for consideration by City Commission.
CDB/pd
CC:
Richard Hasko, P.E., Director of Environmental Services
John Bullard, Manager of Water Treatment Plant
City Clerks Office
Agenda File
U \wwdata~Memo\C~ty ManagerLRehab of Clanfier 4 doc
AGENDA REQUEST
No.
Request to be placed on:
X Regular Agenda
__ Special Agenda
__ Workshop Agenda
Agenda Item
Date: September 24, 2001
When: October 2, 2001
Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Staff requests Commission approval of the purchase
of labor and equipment for the rehabilitation of the mechanical components of Clarifier No. 4 at the Water
Treatment Plant. The labor and equipment will be provided by Eimco Process Equipment Company, our
sole source provider for Clarfier equipment. The total amount of this purchase is $51,510.00 and will be
funded from R&R Account # 442-5178-536-64.90, Other machinery_ and Equipment.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Eimco Process Equipment Company.
Department head signature:
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):.
Budget Director Review~ed on all items involving expenditure of funds):
~ Funding availablt~Yt~S~NO
/~1~ , Funding altemativL~--~ .
'X,x~q~0s~Account No. & Des~cription
~ Account Balance $ '2-~ ~: O d O
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda:(~O
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
U'\wwdata~Fonns~genda Requests~gendaReq - Clanfier 4 doc
July 13, 2001
Mr. Clive Grant
City of De~ Ray Beach
200 South West 6m ~tmet
Del Ray Beach, FL 33444
561-243-7318
561-243-7316 Fax
Copy: TSC -Jacobs Corporation
Subject:
Proposal to rebuild (2) Reaclor Clarffiers No. 4 and Clarifler No. 1. Serial
Numbers 21227-01 and 22695.01,
Dear Mr. Grant,
Eimco Prooess Equipment Company is pleased lo provide the following proposal to
rebuild on site (2) 85' diameter Reactor Clarirer No. 4 and No_ 1. The scope of work is
based on an on site visit by Mr. Helmut Kaesberger on June 30, 2001.
Sr. opu of
Reactor Clafifler No. 4
Remove and rebuild C541C72PH drive unit and replaoe all bearings, seals, drive control,
worm gear bronze bushing etc. The hanger rods to be replaced with stainless steel
turnbuckles, rods and clevis. The following parts should be purchased for this on site
rebuild.
2 20766H BEARING STRIP, BOTTOM & TOP $622.0o
I 20766.1 BEARING STRIP, bUTER $320.00
1 20766G BEARING ,STRIP, INNER, ' -'~ $305 00
2 F6024~ ........ CLAMP.SCREW $1i.00
46 88556C CLAMP BAND, FT
1 86762B GAUGE. OIL $41.00
I 86762C ' '~AUGE, OIL "' $42.00
107,,, 85321W ...... ,B,,EARfNG BALLS, 1% DIA, $963.00
1 F60149 BEARING " $97 00
1 F60f66 BEARING $146.00
I F60129 BEARING S64.00'
I F60148 BEARING $i23
1 F60151 BEARING ......... $281.00
J'LL ~ '01 3.2:54 FR EIMCO I~TS & Si~ICEI~I ~ 2~ TO I~S_~'"'?'? P.1~13/10
F60150 BEARING $266.00,
46767BP RETAINING RING $5.00
46767CB RETAINING RING $14.00
46767BW RETAINING RING $18.00
46763L OIL SEAL $29
~6055A COCK DRAIN $~88.00
ss414^ COCK GAUGE
SS?02A ~.~SE FrrnN¢ ~.oo
88607C "LIP ~:AL' .-. $$,.00 '
46758AR OIL SEAL $15.00
46763K OIL SEAL $80.00
F60045 BEAR-linG $324.00
46767BP RETAINING RING $8_00
46766BD RETANING RING
8011SA WORM ~i-IAF~ BUSHING
L115759-3 DRIVE P-,,ONTROL W/POT $'2192.00
L204345-1 TC~RQ'UE TRANSMI'I'FER $1037.00
48806A ACTUATING PIN
LOT OF HARI~WARE & PIPING $280.00
X22695B120A H',~NGER ROD, 304SS $6.940 00 '"
INCLUDES; (12) CLEVIS & (6)
TURNBUCKLES IN 304~$
Total amount for parts listed above ........................ $14,620.00
Labor Portion:
To include removal of drive unl~ and rebuild on site using ~ components lisled above.
We will also replace the (4) tie rods and turnbuckles. We will fumish equipment to
support the reaction well while replacing the tie rod components.
We would furnish a 4-5 man millwright crew, a 50 ton crane and operator and I Eimco
serviceman throughout this project. We understand that we will be required to make
two visits, once to remove the drive and then returning after sand blast and painting to
rebuild the drive.
Total amount to rebuild clarifmr No, 4 only ...................................... $36,890.00
Total amount with parts and labor to rebuild Clarifler No, 4 .......... $5t,510.00
Clarifier No. 1 SIN 22695-01 (3) 65' dia. Reactor Clarififers.
Unit no. 1 is to have the turbine drive and the rare worm drive rebuilt. The tu[bine drive
requires a new pinion, chain coupling, bearings and seals_ The worm drive assembly
requires all bearings, seals, bronze bushings, bottom p~nion bearing and drive control
Unit no. 2 requires a drive control indicator cover only. Unit no. 3 requires a new drive
control unit. See table below.
JLa. ~ '~dl i,~:5~ ~R E~33 Pier, TS · S~UICE~81 526 ~ TO ~?
1' F60129 BEARING, LOWER PINION $64,00
1 F60148 ~E~RING~ LOWI~R PINION $123.00
I F60149 BEANING, TURBINE, DRIVE $97,00
1 F-60166 nEARING, TURBINE DRIVE $146.00
i 46767~NV RETAiNiNG RING "'$18 00
1 F6~ 51 BEARING $281.00'
'1 F6015'~ ...... BEARING $266.00
I 46767CA ' RETAINING RING $;28 00
2 F50245 CLAMP, SCREW $11.DO
23 88556C BAND CLAMP $33.00
15 902727C PACKINGS. J~l' $146
I 8-~-9-8A GA$1~r COVER PLATE ..... $2.00
I 46758AR OIL SEAL $15100
2 46763K OIL SEAL '- $~0~00
2 FG0045 BEARING ' $324.00
I F60131 BEARING $274 00
I 46767BP RETAINING RING $6.00
1 46766BD RETAINING RING $26 O0
I ~,~ 14^ GAUGE, COCK $42.00
I 88931J GAb(SE; OIL ...... $40.00
I F10018 HEX BUSHING $4,00
1 80115^ WORI~ SHAFT BUSHIN(S ' $65.0Q
1 LOT OF HARDWJ~E & PIPING
2' L115759-3 DRIVE CONTROl. $4,4~_0.00
2 48806A ACTUATING PIN $23 00
2 1.204345-1 TORQUE TRANSMITTER $4,148,0d'
1 E1~i0665 .... INI~ICATO~ COVER $42 00
Total amount for parts listed .bore ........................ $11.024_00
Labor Portmn:
Remove and rebuild Ihe turbine and worm drive for the rake d~ive and install new drive
control and components for the other olarifiem. We will supply a 50 ton crane and
operator.
Total price for labor on Cla~fier No. 1.. ............................................ $20,920.00
Total amount with parts and labor to rebuild Clarifier No. t .......... $31,944.00
Prices are firm for ninety (90) days. Terms o! payment are net 30 days. Lead-time is 6-
8 weeks after purchase order is received into Salt LaKe City, Utat~. Freight is prepaid.
FOB shipping point. Project estimated to lake 3 days for the first trip and 5 days for the
second trip,
JUL 2~ '01 12:55 FR EIM(I] PARTS & SERUICE8~I 526 25iT~ TO ~ P.i~15/10 '
We appreciate the opportunity to quote this project, and thank you for your interest in
~imco Process Equipment OEM parts and services. If you have any questions please
do not hesitate to call.
Terry A. Reybum
Rebuild MarkeUng Manager
Phone: (801) 526 -2430
Fax'. (801) 526-256~
Attachments (2)
Field Set, Joe Rate Sheet
Standard Term,9 & Conditions
~~ ~ ~~ CLARIFIER ~4 REHABILITATION
il
C~_ARFIER UNIT
WATER TREATMENT PLANT 200 $.W. 6TH ST.
I Jl CITY of DELRAY BEACH~a,~~~^~~~ II
WATER TREATMENT PLANT DATE:9/25/01
CLARIFIER #4 REHABILITATION
2oo1-~oo 1 OF 1
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
CITY MANAGER ~
A(~ENDA ITEM #~-- REGULAR MEETIN(~ OF OGTOBER 2. 2001
DELRAY BEACH RENAISSANCE PROGRAM SUBSIDY REQUEST
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is before the Commission for approval of five (5) subsidy awards to eligible applicants/families
under the Delray Beach Renaissance Program for the following properties:
$19,500 for SW 8m Avenue
$18,000 for SW 3~d Avenue
$19,238 for SW 6m Avenue
$15,000 for SW 15~h Avenue
$15,000 for SW 13th Avenue.
All are for new construction and these five (5) subsidies bring the total to 130-homeowner assistance
grants provided under the City Renaissance Program. The two subsidies being awarded for new
construction on SW 13th Avenue are to families who have been displaced due to the West Atlantic
Avenue Redevelopment activities.
Funding is available from 118-1924-554-83.01 (SHIP Program).
Recommend approval of the funding subsidies under Delray Beach Renaissance Program as outlined
~l. bove.
AGMEMO.1 IREN AISSANCEPROGRAMA0.0Z01
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
THRU:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
David Harden, City Manager
Kenneth L. Thomas, Community Development Administrator
Lula Butler, Community Improvement Director
September 25,2001
Delray Beach Renaissance Program Subsidy Requests
ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION
City Commission authorization and approval to issue subsidies to five (5) eligible
applicants/families under the Delray Beach Renaissance Program. These subs~&es bring the total
to 130 homeownersh~p assistance grants provided under the mty Renaissance Program to date.
BACKGROUND
The Delray Beach Renaissance Program Memorandum of Understanding was approved by the
City Commission on January 23, 1996. In partnership with the Delray Beach Community
Development Corporation, the TED Center, the Community Redevelopment Agency, the
Community Finanmng Consortium, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and the Delray
Beach Housing Authority, we are committed to prow&ng homeownersh~p opportunities to 80
homebuyers through new construction and acquisition rehab beginning October 1, 1995 through
September 30, 1998. An agreement to extend the program for one additional year was approved
by all partners and the City Commission. On June 15, 1999, the C~ty Commission approved a
new Memorandum of Understanding operating the Renaissance Program.
Each potential homebuyer is required to attend a homebuyer's seminar sponsored by the
Community Financing Consortium, Inc., the Renaissance Program's parmer and first mortgage
lender. The seminar includes training and information on financial planning, credit and
borrowing, budgeting, fair housing ~ssues, mortgage and closing costs and a comprehensive
glossary of real estate terms.
The Grant is secured by a Promissory Note/Second Mortgage approved by the City Attorney and
reqmres the applicant to maintain ownership/residence for a specified period according to the
amount of the Grant. Grant amounts less than $15,000 per unit are forgiven at a rate of 20% per
year for a period of five (5) years and Grant amounts equal to or greater than $15,000 but less
than $25,000 per unit are forgiven at a rate of 10% per year for ten (10) years.
Delray Beach Renaissance Program Subsidy Request
Agenda Item #
Page 2
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff is recommending City Commission approval
applicants/families of the following properties:
to fund subsidies for five (5) eligible
(New Construction) xxx SW 8th Ave.- $19,500
(New Construction) xxx SW 3ra Ave. - $18,000
(New Construction) xxx SW 6th Ave. - $19,238
(New Construction) xxx SW 13th Ave. - $15,000
(New Construction) xxx SW 13th Ave. - $15,000
Lot 4, Block C, Ridgewood Heights Delray
Resub of S½ of Blk 38 and N½ of Blk 39, Lot 12
S50 Ft of the N 200 Ft of the E135 Ft of Blk 14
Lot 13, Lmcoln Atlantic Park Gardens
Lot 2, Blk 3, Lincoln Atlantic Park Gardens
The two subsidies being awarded for new construction on SW 13th Avenue are to families who
have been displaced due to the W. Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment activities. These subsidies
are in line with the City's approval of the CRA's request to allocate four (4) subsidy awards
annually, not to exceed $15,000 each.
DELRAY BEACH RENAISSANCE PROGRAM
SUBSIDY REQUEST BREAKDOWN
NEW CONSTRUCTION YES
CENSUS TRACT 68.02
NAME Jean & Marie Delpe
PROPERTY ADDRESS xxx SW 8th Avenue, Delray Beach
LEGAL DESCRPTION Lot 4, Block C, RiDGEWOOD HEIGHTS DELRAY
% OF AREA MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME 40%
FIRST MORTGAGE
RATE 6.375 %
LTV 74.75 %
PROJECT/SUBSIDY BREAKDOWN
COST OF CONSTRUCTION
COST OF LOT
COST OF EXISTING UNIT
NON- PROFIT DEVELOPER'S FEE
Estimated Pre-paids (Lender 1003)
Estimated Closing Costs (Lender 1003)
TOTAL TRANSACTION:
FIRST MORTGAGE
TOTAL SUBSIDY
Second Mortgage $22,000.00
Developer's Fee $ 3,000.00
$89,000.00
$12,000.00
N/A
$ 3,000.00
$ 2,301.00
$ 4,117.00
$110~427.00
$ 75,500.00
$ 25,000.00
THIRD MORTGAGE
OTHER CREDITS
Estimated Cash To/From Borrower (Lender 1003)
$ 5,400.00
$ ,5OO.OO
$ 4,027.00
NO. IN HOUSEHOLD 4
Community Financing Consortium
City of Delra¥ Beach SHIP
Seller Concession
Lot Deposit
DELRA Y BEACH
MEMORIAL
GARDENS
L
S.W.
lOTH
1TH ST
PINE GROVE
EL EMEN TAR Y
SCHOOL
FALL RIDGE
STREET
REIGLE AVENUE
:4 OF DELRA Y STERLING AVENUE
THE
GROVES
DOUGLASS AVENUE
SOUTHRIDGE ROAD
BESSIE ST
GULF STREAM
COMMERCIAL CENTRE
ELLA ST
LIN TON
RID GE
CONDO
LIN TON TRUSS
B.F.I
MAROONE
DODGE
SOUTHRIDGE RD~j ZEBER AVE:
~ SOUTHRIDGE I~
WLLAGE I~/
~ { CON~O
LIN TON
~ f
BENJAMIN AVE
SECURITY
SELF STORAGE
BOULEVARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, F'L
PLANNING &: ZONING DEPARTMENT
XXX S.W. 8TH AVENUE
12-43-46-20-20-003-0040
-- DIGI~',4L ~4E.E IvJ4P SYSTEM --
DELRAY BEACH RENAISSANCE PROGRAM
SUBSIDY REQUEST BREAKDOWN
NEW CONSTRUCTION YES
CENSUS TRACT 68.02
NAME Ronald Brinkley and Tamara Ellington
PROPERTY ADDRESS xxx SW 3rd Avenue, Delray Beach
LEGAL DESCRPTION Resub of the S½ of Block 38 and the N½ of Block 39, Delray Beach,
Lot 12, Block 39
% OF AREA MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME 74%
FIRST MORTGAGE
RATE 7.00 %
LTV %
PROJECT/SUBSIDY BREAKDOWN
COST OF CONSTRUCTION
COST OF LOT
COST OF EXISTING UNIT
NON- PROFIT DEVELOPER'S FEE
Estimated Pre-paids (Lender 1003)
Estimated Closing Costs (Lender 1003)
TOTAL TRANSACTION:
FIRST MORTGAGE
TOTAL SUBSIDY
Second Mortgage $15,000.00
Developer's Fee $ 3,000.00
$94,000.00
$15,00o.00
N/A
$ 3,000.00
$ 1,257.15
$ 2,031.13
$115~288.18
$ 94,000.00
$18,000.00
THIRD MORTGAGE
OTHER CREDITS
Estimated Cash To/From Borrower (Lender 1003)
$3,288.28
NO. IN HOUSEHOLD 4
(including rehabilitation costs)
Northem Trust
City of Delray Beach SHIP
ATLANTIC
HIII
S. #. 21'~D .?,TI
S.W 1ST
SW.
II
4TH
POLICE
COMPLEX
AVENUE
COUNTY
COURT
HOUSE
ST S.W. 1ST ST.
3RD ST.
2ND
PARK
SI.
DRUG ABUSE FOUNDATION
OF
PALM BEACH COUNTY
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
PUBLIC WORKS
COMPLEX
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
XXX S.W. 3RD AVENUE
12-43-46-17-07-039-0120
-- OIC. II'AL ~$E ~ S)~JTEI~t --
DELRAY BEACH RENAISSANCE PROGRAM
SUBSIDY REQUEST BREAKDOWN
NEW CONSTRUCTION YES
CENSUS TRACT 68.02
NAME Lesly Mathurin
PROPERTY ADDRESS xxx SW 6th Avenue, Delray Beach
LEGAL DESCRPTION The S50 Ft of the N 200 Ft of the E 135 Ft of Block 14, Delray Beach
% OF AREA MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME 65%
FIRST MORTGAGE
RATE 6.875 %
LTV 83.00 %
PROJECT/SUBSIDY BREAKDOWN
COST OF CONSTRUCTION
COST OF LOT
REMOVAL OF TREES FROM LOT
NON- PROFIT DEVELOPER'S FEE
Estimated Pre-paids (Lender 1003)
Estimated Closing Costs (Lender 1003)
TOTAL TRANSACTION:
FIRST MORTGAGE
TOTAL SUBSIDY
Second Mortgage $16,200.00
Developer's Fee $ 3,000.00
$89,927.00
$15,5oo.oo
$ 9, 975.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 1,303.00
$ 1,967.28
$121~672.28
98,800.00
19,200.00
THIRD MORTGAGE
OTHER CREDITS
Estimated Cash To/From Borrower (Lender 1003)
$3,672.28
NO. IN HOUSEHOLD 3
Northem Trust
City of Delray Beach SHIP
ATLANTIC
i i
till
S W 1ST
SW
II
J I t I I I tllltlilttl] I
4TH
II
POLICE
COMPLEX
ST.
2ND
AVENUE
SOUTH[ I
COUNTY
S.W. 1ST
3rD
COURT
HOUSE
MERRI TT
PARK
ST.
DRUG ABUSE FOUNDATION
OF
PALM BEACH COUNTY
CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH
PUBLIC WORKS
COMPLEX
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
XXX S.W. 6TH AVENUE
12-43.46-16-01-014-0040
-- Dig'~I;41 ~4S£ t,,f,4P SY'~TEM --
DELRAY BEACH RENAISSANCE PROGRAM
SUBSIDY REQUEST BREAKDOWN
NEW CONSTRUCTION YES
CENSUS TRACT 68.02
NAME Napoleon Zanders
PROPERTY ADDRESS xxx SW 13th Avenue, Delray Beach
LEGAL DESCRPTION Lot 13, LINCOLN ATLANTIC PARK GARDENS
% OF AREA MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME 17%
FIRST MORTGAGE
RATE
LTV
PROJECT/SUBSIDY BREAKDOWN
COST OF CONSTRUCTION
COST OF LOT
COST OF EXISTING UNIT
Estimated Pre-paids (Lender 1003)
Estimated Closing Costs (Lender 1003)
TOTAL TRANSACTION:
FIRST MORTGAGE
SECOND MORTGAGE
THIRD MORTGAGE
OTHER CREDITS
Estimated Cash To/From Borrower (Lender 1003)
TOTAL TRANSACTION:
NO. IN HOUSEHOLD 1
$87,550.00
$11,500.00
N/A
$
$ 500.00
99~550.00
20,000.00
15,000.00
58,900.00
(including rehabilitation costs)
CRA
City of Delray Beach SHIP
Sale of 16 SW 7t~ Ave. to CRA
$
$ 5,650.00*
$ 99~550.00
* Mr. Zanders' children have agreed to assist him with the funds needed to close this deal
~ ' ATLANTIC AVENUE
S W 2ND ST.
< ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-- '~ S.~I. 2N) ~T
~ ~i S I. 2N)
S.W. 3RD ST
W, ~RD DELRA Y
FULL SERVICE s w 3~ c~
CENTER j ~ ,
W 4TH ST '
~ S.W 41H
AUBURN CIRCLE NOR~
~ ~ ~ ~ HAITIAN
~ CA T~OLlC
~ ~ ~ ~ CHURCH IIII
N
~ ~ S.w. ~ 3TH AVENUE
**~ or ~[t~av ~tac., ~ ~2434~-~7-20-000-0~30
PLANNINO ~ ZONING DEPAR~ENT
-- D~lrA ~SE ~P S~TE~ --
I
,I
DELRAY BEACH RENAISSANCE PROGRAM
SUBSIDY REQUEST BREAKDOWN
NEW CONSTRUCTION YES
CENSUS TRACT 68.02
NAME Robin Hickman
PROPERTY ADDRESS xxx SW 13th Avenue, Delray Beach
LEGAL DESCRPTION Lot 2, Block 3, LINCOLN ATLANTIC PARK GARDENS
% OF AREA MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME 41%
FIRST MORTGAGE
RATE
LTV
NO. IN HOUSEHOLD 2
PROJECT/SUBSIDY BREAKDOWN
COST OF CONSTRUCTION
COST OF LOT
COST OF EXISTING UNIT
Estimated Pre-paids (Lender 1003)
Estimated Closing Costs (Lender 1003)
TOTAL TRANSACTION:
FIRST MORTGAGE
SECOND MORTGAGE
THIRD MORTGAGE
OTHER CREDITS
Estimated Cash To/From Borrower (Lender 1003)
TOTAL TRANSACTION:
$82,700.00
$12,500.00
N/A
$ 1,000.00
$ 96~200.00
$ 20,00O.O0
$15,000.00
$57,000.00
$ 4,200.00
$96~200.00
CRA
City of Delray Beach SHIP
Sale of 18 SW 7th Ave. to CRA
II
S.W
~ JL~
ATLANTIC
s w 1ST
GA TEWA Y
MINI PARKS
J
S W 2ND
DELRA Y
FULL SERVICE
CENTER
s.w 4TH
AUBURN CIRCLE NORTH
3RD
AVENUE
ST
HAITIAN I
CA THOLIC
CHURCH
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL
PLANNING &: ZONING DEPARTMENT
XXX S.W. 13TH AVENUE
12-43-46-17-18-003-0020
-- DIG'II"AL ~45E 4,f,4P SYETEM --
AGENDA REQUEST
Request to be placed on:
x Regular Agenda
Special Agenda
__ Workshop Agenda
~ Consent Agenda
Date:
September 26, 2001
When: October 2, 2001
Description of item (who, what, where, how much):
Authorization and approval to issue subsidies to five (5) eligible applicants under the
Delray Beach Renaissance Program totaling $86,738.00
Note: These five applicants bring the total homeownership assistance grants provided
under the Renaissance Program to date to 130.
ORDINANCE / RESOLUTION REQUIED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of five (5) subsidy awards. Funds are to be awarded from the
State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Program.
SHIP Total: $ 86,738.00 Account Number:
Department Head Signature:(,/'~ ~
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
118-1924-554-83.01
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds):
Funding available: ~/NO~
Funding Altematives: (if applicable)
Account No. & Description:
Account Balance:
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda:(~/NO~
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action: Approved/Disapproved
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
C~i~OR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS MANAGER
AGENDA ITEM 0{7~' - REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
RESOLUTION NO. 60-01
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is a resolution assessing costs for abatement action required to remove nuisances on thirteen (13)
propernes throughout the C~ty.
The resolution sets forth the actual costs incurred and provides the mechanism to attach liens against the
properties m the event the assessments remain unpmd.
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 60-01.
RefiAgmemo.Res.No. 60-01/CE
RESOLUTION NO. 60-01
A RESOLUTION OF TH~ CITY COMMISSION OF TH~ CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 100 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSINg COSTS FOR ABATINg NUISANCES UPON
CERTAIN LAND(S) LOCATED WITHIN w~us CITY OF DELRAY BEACH AND PROVIDINg
THAT A NOTICE OF LI~N SHALL ACCOMPANY T~ NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT~
SETTINg OUT ACTUAL COSTS INuu~.~ED BY THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH
ABATEMENT AND LEVYINg THE COST OF SUCH ABATEMENT OF NUISANCES~
PROVIDINg FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND INTEREST ON
ASSESSMENTS~ PROVIDINg FOR THE RECORDINg OF THIS RESOLUTION, AND
DECLARINg SAID LEVY TO BE A LIEN UPON TH~ SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR UNPAID
ASSESSMENTS.
WHEREAS, the City Manager or his designated representative has, pursuant to
Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances, declared the existence of a nuisance upon
certain lots or parcels of land, described in the list attached hereto and made a part
hereof, for violation of the provisions of Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances~ and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 100.20, 100.21 and 100.22 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, the City Manager or his designated
representative has inspected said land(s) and has determined that a nuisance existed in
accordance with the standards set forth in Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances, and
did furnish the respective owner(s) of the land(s) described in the attached list with
written notice of public nuisance pursuant to Sections 100.20, 100.21 and 100.22 of the
Code of Ordinances describing the nature of the nuisance(s) and sent notice that within
ten (10) days from the date of said notice forty-two (42) days in the case of violation
of Section 100.04 pertaining to seawalls) they must abate said nuisance, or file a
written request for a hearing to review the decision that a nuisance existed within ten
(10) days from the date of said notice, failing which the City of Delray Beach would
proce%d to correct this condition by abating such nuisance, and that the cost thereof
would be levied as an assessment against said property~ and,
WHEREAS, the property owner(s) named in the list attached hereto and made a
part hereof did fail and neglect to abate the nuisance(s) existing upon their
respective lands or to properly request a hearing pursuant to Section 100.21 and 100.22
within the time limits prescribed in said notice and Chapter 100 of the Code of
Ordinances, or if the property owner(s) did request and receive a hearing, said
property owner(s) failed and/or neglected to abate such nuisance(s) within the time
designated at the hearing wherein a decision was rendered adverse to the property
owner(s)~ and,
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach, through the City Administration or such
agents or contractors hired by the City Administration was therefore required to and
did enter upon the land(s) described in the list attached and made a part hereof and
incurred costs in abating the subject nuisance(s) existing thereon as described in the
notice~ and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach has, pursuant to
Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, submitted to the
City Commission a report of the costs incurred in abating said nuisance(s) as
aforesaid, said report indicating the costs per parcel of land involved~ end,
WHEREAS, the City C~4ssion o£ the City of Delray Beach, pursuant to
Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances desires to assess the cost of said nuisance(s)
against said property owner(s),
NOW, T~EREFORB, BE ~T RBSOLVED BY TI~ CITY CONMISSXON OF '£~ CXTY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLONS~
Section 1. That assessments in the individual amounts as shown by the
report of the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach, involving the City's cost of
abating the aforesaid nuisances upon the lots or parcels of land described in said
report, a copy of which is attached hereto and mede a part hereof, are hereby levied
against the parcel(s) of land described in said report and in the amount(s) indicated
thereon. Said assessments so levied shall, if not paid within thirty (30) days after
mailing of the notice described in Sec. 3, become a lien upon the respective lots and
parcel(s) of land described in said report, of the same nature and to the same extent
as the lien for general city taxes and shall be collectible in the same manner as
mortgages and foreclosures are under state law.
Section 2. That such assessments shall be legal, valid and binding
obligations upon the property against which said assessments are levied.
Section 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach is hereby
directed to immediately mail by first class mail to the owner(s) of the property, as
such ownership appears upon the records of the County Tax Assessor, notice(s) that the
City Commission of the City of Delray Beach on the has
levied an assessment against said property for the cost of abatement of said nuisance
by the City, and that said assessment is due and payable within thirty (30) days after
the mailing date of said notice of assessment, after which a lien shall be placed on
said.property, and interest will accrue at the rate of 8% par annum, plus reasonable
attorney's fees and other costs of collecting said sums. A Notice of Lien shall be
mailed, along with the Notice of Assessment and this resolution.
Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days
from the date of adoption and the assessment(s) contained herein shall become due and
payable thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice of said assessment(s),
after which a lien shall be placed on said property(s), and interest shall accrue at
the rate of eight (8) percent per annum plus, if collection proceedings are necessary,
the costs of such proceedings including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Section 5. That in the event that payment has not been received by the City
Clerk within thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice of assessment, the
City Clerk is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this resolution in the
public records of Palm Beach County, Florida, and upon the date end time of recording
of the certified copy of this resolution a lien shall become effective on the subject
property which shall secure the cost of abatement, interest at the rate of 8%, and
collection costs including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Res. No. 60-01
PASSED ~trD &DOPTED £n regular session on this the
, 200Z.
day
MAYOR
ATTEST
City Clerk
Res. No. 60-01
COST OF ABATING NUISANCES UNDER CHAPTER 100
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OWNER ASSESSMENT
DELRAY SHORES 1st ADDITION, LOT 12, BLOCK 12, PRONEL DUSSEK
PB 3, P 1, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH 104 NATURES WAY
COUNTY, FL ROYAL PALM BEACH, FL 33411
(2788 LAKE IDA ROAD)
12 43 46 07 02 012 0120
CUST ID#8914 $ 30.45
$ 70.00 ADM. FEE
DELRAY SHORES 1ST ADDITION, LOT 12,
BLOCK 12, PB 77, P 67, PUBLIC RECORDS PRONEL DUSSEK
OF PALM BEACH, FL 104 NATURES WAY
(2788 LAKE IDA ROAD) ROYAL PALM BEACH, FL 3341
12 43 46 07 02 012 0120
CUST ID # 8914
$ 67.18
$ 70.00 ADM.FEE
DELRAY SHORES, LOT 25, BLOCK 2 SECRETARY HOUSING &
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL 'URBAN DEVELOPMENT
(575 ANGLER DRIVE) 909 SE 1ST AVENUE # 500
12 43 46 07 01 002 0250 MIAMI, FL 33131 'ADM
CUSTID#7184 ' $ 58 18
$ 7O.OO .
FEE
I
ROBERT G. ALLEN &
TOWN OF DELRAY, LOT 3, BLOCK 47, PB 3, P 1, PATRICIA ALLEN
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL ,206 SW 2ND AVENUE
(206 SW 2ND AVENUE) ~DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444
12 43,46 16 01 047 0030
CUSTID#60 $ 58.18
$ 70.00 ADM.FEE
PINE TRAIL SECTION 3 FINAL PLAT, LOT 11
(LESS SLY 49.36 FT) BLOCK 6, PB 33, P 126, LINDA CAMACH
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL 547 NW 50TH AVENUE
r
(547 NW 50TH AVENUE) DELRAY BEACH, FL 33445
12 42 46 12 09 006 0111
CUSTID#8917 $ 35.00
$ 70.00 ADM. FEE
4
Res. No. 60 - 01
COST OF ABATING NUISANCES UNDER CHAPTER 100
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE
TOWN OF DELRAY, S 50 FT OF N 200 FT OF
120 FT OF BLOCK 25, PB 3, P 1, PUBLIC RECORDS EDWIN C. IVY
OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL 519 SW 15TH TERR.
(NW 5TH AVENUE) DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444
12 43 46 16 01 025 0210
CUST ID # 181 $ 58.18
$ 70.00 ADM.FEE
NICHOLS 2ND ADDITION TO DELRAY BEACH,
LOT 14, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH MOLLIE K. BOWLES
COUNTY, FL GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM
(7950 NW 53RD STREET # 301) OF DADE COUNTY
12 43 46 20 08 000 0140 7950 NW 53RD STREET # 301
CUST ID # 5102 MIAMI, FL 33166-7903 $ 58.18 _
$ 70.00 ADM. FEE
SOUTHRIDGE, LOT 7, BLOCK 7, PB 13, P 38, DAVID MORENO & ,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL JOSEPH MORENO
((2410 SUNDY AVENUE) 5222 NW 98TH WAY
12 43 46 20 13 007 0070 CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33076-
CUST ID # 8916 2640 $ 50.45
! $ 70.00 ADM. FEE
r
STRATFORD ATTA BOWE PLAT, PARCEL 2,
(OLD SCHOOL SQUARE HISTORIC DISTRICT) BRUCE MCKEEVER &
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL CATHERINE MCKEEVER
(255 NORTH SWINTON AVENUE) 1122 BUTTONWOOD LANE
12 43 46 16 09 002 0000 BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436
CUST. ID # 8918
:$ 67.18.
$ 70.00 ;ADM. FEE
DELL PARK, LOT 15, BLOCK 9, PB 76, P 110
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL
(204 NE 10TH STREET) MARK ANDERSON &
12 43 46 09 28 009 0150 RUTH ANDERSON
CUST ID # 8919 204 NE 10TH STREET
DELRYA BEACH, FL 33444 $ 154.50 ,
$ 70.00 rADM. FEE
5
Res. No. 60 - 01
COST OF ABATING NUISANCES UNDER CHAPTER 100
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE
SOUTHRIDGE, LOT 10, BLOCK 7, PB 13, P 38, DAVID M. MORANO &
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL JOSEPH MORANO
(2422 SUNDY AVENUE) 5222 NW 98TH WAY
12 43 46 20 13 007 0100 CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33076
CUST ID # 7437 $ 50.45
$ 70.00 ADM FEE
JEFFERSON MANOR, LOT 32, PB 24, P 150,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL
(1331 PROSPECT STREET) LEONARD C. BRYANT
12 43 46 17 24 000 0320 645 ENFIELD COURT
CUST ID $ 7655 DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444
$ 58.18
$ 70.00 ADM. FEE
BONIECREST SUB., LOT 2, PUBLIC RECORDS
OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL
(118 HIGHLAND LANE) CATHERINE G. NEWKERK
12 43 46 09 21 000 0020 118 HIGHLAND LANE
CUST ID # 8915 DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 $ 58.18 I
$ 70.00 !ADM. FEE
I
VIOLATION IS: SEC. 100-01 - LAND TO BE KEPT FREE OF DEBRIS, VEGETATION,
MATTER CONSTITUTING HAZARDS, DECLARED NUISANCE.
Res. No. 60 -01
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
CiTy YOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
MANAGER
AGENDA ITEM ~/~ - REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
RESOLUTION NO. 61-01
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is a resolution assessing costs for abatement action required for the emergency board-up of an unsafe
structure located at 1331 NW 3'a Street.
The resolution sets forth the actual costs incurred and provides the mechanism to attach a lien against the
property in the event the assessment remains unpaid.
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 61-01.
RefiAgmemoRes61-01.boardup
RESOLUTION NO. 61-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELP~AY
BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7.8, "UNSAFE BUILDINGS",
OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS FOR ABATEMENT ACTION REGARDING AN
UNSAFE BUILDING ON LAND(S) LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH; SETTING OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY TO
ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABATEMENT AND LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH
ACTION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE
AND INTEREST ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE RECORDING OF THIS
RESOLUTION, AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO BE A LIEN UPON THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR UNPAID ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE
MAILING OF NOTICE.
WHEREAS, the Building Official or his designated representative
has, pursuant to Article 7.8 of the Land Development Regulations, declared
the existence of an unsafe building upon certain lots or parcels of land,
described in the list attached hereto and made a part hereof, for violation
of the building codes and building requirements adopted by Article 7.8 and
those Codes adopted in Chapter 96 of the Code of Ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 7.8 of the Land Development
Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, the Building Official or his
designated representative has inspected said land(s) and has determined that
an unsafe building existed in accordance with the standards set forth in
Article 7.8 and/or Chapter 96 of the Code of Ordinances, and did furnish the
respective owner(s) of the land(s) described in the attached list with
written notice of unsafe building and detailed report of conditions and
notice to vacate as the Building Official determined that the building was
manifestly unsafe and is considered a hazard to life and public welfare
pursuant to Article 7.8 of the Land Development Regulations, describing the
nature of the violations and sent notices that the building was to be vacated
and that the building was to be repaired or demolished; work must be begun
within sixty (60) days and all work must be completed within such time as the
Building Official determines, said notice also advised that all appeals must
be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of the notice and
failure to file an appeal or to make the repairs required that the Building
Official would have the authority to have the building demolished from the
date of the said notice; and,
WHEREAS, all the notice requirements contained within Article 7.8
have been complied with; and,
WHEREAS, neither an appeal to the Board of Construction Appeals or
corrective action was undertaken in accordance with the order of the Chief
Building Official; therefore pursuant to Article 7.8 of the Land Development
Regulations the Building Official caused the abatement action to be done;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach has, pursuant
to Section 7.8.11 of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray
Beach, submitted to the City Commission a report of the costs incurred in
abating said condition as aforesaid, said report indicating the costs per
parcel of land involved; and,
WHEREAS, the ~ity Commission of the City of Delray Beach, pursuant
to Article 7.8 of the Land Development Regulations desires to assess the cost
of said condition against said property owner(s).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
That assessments in the amount of
as shown by the
report of the City Manager of the City of Delray a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby levied against the parcel(s) of
land described in said report and in the amount(s) indicated thereon. Said
assessments so levied shall, if not paid within thirty (30) days after
mailing of the notice described in Section 7.8.11 become a lien upon the
respective lots and parcel(s) of land described in said report, of the same
nature and to the same extent as the lien for general city taxes and shall be
collectible in the same manner and with the same penalties and under the same
pro+isions as to sale and foreclosure as City taxes are collectible.
Section 2. That such assessments shall be legal, valid and binding
obligations upon the property against which said assessments are levied.
Section 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach is
hereby directed to immediately mail by certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, to the owner(s) of the property, as such ownership
appears upon the records of the County Tax Assessor, notice(s) that the City
Commission of the City of Delray Beach has levied an assessment against said
property for the cost of abatement action regarding an unsafe building by the
thirty (30) days after the mailing date of said notice of assessment, after
which a lien shall be placed on said property, and interest will accrue at
Res. No. 61-01
the rate of six percent (6%) per annum, plus reasonable attorney's fees and
other costs of collecting said sums.
Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective thirty (30)
days from the date of adoption and the assessment(s) contained herein shall
become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice
of said assessment(s), after which a lien shall be placed on said
property(s), and interest shall accrue at the rate of six percent (6%) per
annum plus reasonable attorney's fee and other costs of collection.
Section 5. That in the event that payment has not been received by
the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice
of assessment, the City Clerk is hereby directed to record a certified copy
of this resolution in the public records of Palm Beach County, Florida, and
upon the date and time of recording of the certified copy of this resolution
a lien shall become effective on the subject property which shall secure the
cost of abatement, interest at the rate of 6%, and collection costs including
a reasonable attorney's fee.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the
, 2001.
day of
ATTEST:
MAYOR
City Clerk
Res. No. 61-01
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
UNSAFE BUILDING/STRUCTURE
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT
TO: WILLIAM SCHMIDT
MAILING ADDRESS: 1331 NW 3rd Street
Delray Beach, FL 33444
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1331 NW 3~ Street
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 48, Jefferson Manor according to Plat Book 24,
Page 150 of the official records of Palm Beach County, FL
You, as the record owner, of, or holder of an interest in, the above described property are
hereby advised that a cost of $1~625.60 by resolution of the City Commission of the
City of Delray Beach, Florida, dated ,2001 has been levied against the above
described property.
The costs were incurred as a result of an abatement action regarding the above described
property. You were given notice on 4-30-01 that the Chief Building official had
determined that a building/structure located on the above described property was unsafe.
You were advised in that notice of the action that would be taken to remedy that unsafe
condition and that the action would be initiated by the city if you failed to act.
__X__You failed to appeal the decision of the chief Building Official to the Board
of Construction Appeals although you were informed of your right to an appeal and of
the procedures for obtaining an appeal. You have also failed to take the corrective action
required in the Notice of Unsafe Building/Structure.
You appealed the decision of the Chief Building official to the Board of
Construction Appeals. You were given written notification on the decision of the Board
of Construction Appeals within a stated period of time. You failed to take the action as
required by the order of the Board of Construction Appeals.
You appealed the decision of the Chief Building official to the Board of
Construction Appeals. You were given written notification on the decision of the Board
of Construction Appeals within a stated period of time. You failed to take the action as
required by the order of the Board of Construction Appeals.
You appealed the decision of the Chief Building Official to the Board of
Construction Appeals on The Board of Construction
upheld the decision of the Chief Building Official.
4
Res. No. 61--01
The City of Delray Beach has therefore taken remedial action to remove the unsafe
condition existing on the above described property on 4-30-01 at a cost of $1~625.60
which includes a ten percent (10%) administrative fee. If you fail to pay this cost within
thirty (30) days, that cost plus additional administrative and recording costs shall be
recorded in the official Records of Palm Beach County, Florida against the above
described property.
THE CITY MAY ENFORCE THE ASSESSMENT BY EITHER AN ACTION AT
LAW OR FORECLOSURE OF THE LIEN, WHICH SHALL BE FORECLOSED IN
THE SAME MANNER AS MORTGAGES ARE FORECLOSED UNDER STATE
LAW. IN EITHER TYPE OF ACTION, THE CITY SHALL BE ENTITLED TO
INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 8% FROM THE DATE OF ASSESSMENT,
COLLECTION COSTS, AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES. SUCH LIENS
SHALL BE ON A PARITY WITH GENERAL CITY TAXES AND SHALL HAVE
PRIORITY OVER ALL OTHER LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES, INCLUDING
MORTGAGES.
Copies of all notices referred to in this notice are available in the office of the Chief
Building Official.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION
Acting City Clerk
Res. No. 61-01
5
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
CITY MANAGER ~
AGENDA ITEM # 0~/~//- REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
REVIEW OF APPEALABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT BOARD ACTIONS
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
Attached is the Report of Appealable Land Use Items for the period September 17, 2001 through
September 28, 2001. It informs the Comrmssion of the various land use actions taken by the
designated boards that may be appealed by the City Commission.
Recommend review of the appealable actions for the period stated. Receive and file the report as
appropriate.
Ref.'Apagmemo Appealables.10-02-01
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
~/~9~'/~ ~NER
ASMINALL ,
SUBJECT:
MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 *CONSENT AGENDA*
REPORT OF APPEALABLE LAND USE ITEMS SEPTEMBER
2001 THRU SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
17,
The action requested of the City Commission is that of review of appealable actions
which were made by various Boards during the period of September 17, 2001 through
September 28', 2001.
This is the method of informing the City Commission of the land use actions, taken by
designated Boards, which may be appealed by the City Commission. After this
meeting, the appeal period shall expire (unless the 10 day minimum has not
occurred). Section 2.4.7(E) of the LDRs applies. In summary, it provides that the City
Commission hears appeals of actions taken by an approving Board. It also provides
that the City Commission may file an appeal. To do so:
1. The item must be raised by a Commission member.
2. By motion, an action must be taken to place the item on the next meeting of the
Commission as an appealed item.
No appealable items were considered by the Board. The following items will be
forwarded to the City Commission for action.
Recommended approval (4 to 0, Hasner abstained, Shutt and Randolph absent),
of a rezoning from R-1-A (Single Family Residential) to CF (Community Facilities)
to accommodate an off-street parking lot for Donnie's Golden Spoon Restaurant,
th ,
located on the east side of NW 6 Avenue, approximately 300 north of West
Atlantic Avenue.
City Commission Documentation
Appealable Items Meeting of October 2, 2001
Page 2
Recommended approval (4 to 0, Hasner abstained), of a conditional use request to
allow a privately operated parking lot in the CF (Community Facilities) zone district,
for Donnie's Golden Spoon Restaurant, located on the east side of NW 6th Avenue,
approximately 300 feet north of West Atlantic Avenue.
Recommended approval (4 to 0, Pike abstained), of an abandonment request for
a portion of Dixie Highway, 1320 feet south of Gulf Stream Boulevard for Delray
Cycle.
Recommended approved (5 to 0), of an amendment to the Land Development
Regulations Section 4.4.9(D) (Conditional Uses and Structures Allowed), Section
4.4.9(F)(2) (VVest Atlantic Avenue Overlay District Standards) and Section
4.4.9(G)(1) (VVest Atlantic Avenue Overlay District Supplemental District
Regulations), for the GC (General Commercial) Zone District, relating to
recommendations in the West Atlantic Redevelopment Plan.
Recommended approval (5 to 0), of an amendment to the Land Development
Regulations Section 4.4.13 and Section 4.4.28 regarding density in the CBD
(Central Business District) and CBD-RC (Central Business District- Railroad
Corridor) zoning district.
Recommended approval (5 to 0), of an amendment to the Land Development
Regulations regarding the definition of guest cottages.
El Recommended approval (5 to 0), of the transmittal of Comprehensive Plan
amendment 2001-03 relating to School Concurrency.
Recommended approval (5 to 0), of a combined preliminary/final plat for
Renaissance Village, a proposed 20 unit fee-simple townhouse development
located at the southeast corner of NE 6th Avenue (northbound Federal Highway)
and NE 2nd Street.
Approved (6 to 0, Eliopoulos arrived late), a request for a color change for Fleet
Lease Disposal, Inc, existing commercial buildings located on the west side of
th nd
SE 5 Avenue, south of SE 2 Street (250, 258 and 272 SE 5th Avenue).
Approved (6 to 0), the architectural elevation plan associated with the addition of
awnings for O'Connor's Pub, located on the south side of NE 2nd Street, east of
Pineapple Grove Way (210 NE 2nd Street).
Co
Tabled (7 to 0, Eliopoulos arrived), the architectural elevation plan associated with
the addition of an awning for Sidetrack Cafe, located at the southwest corner of
East Atlantic Avenue and the FEC Railroad (290 East Atlantic Avenue). The Board
City Commission Documentation
Appealable Items Meeting of October 2, 2001
Page 3
tabled the item to allow the applicant to address other fa~:ade changes which have
been made to the building.
D. Approved with conditions (7 to 0), the architectural elevation plan for a cabana
facility at Coconut Key, a proposed townhouse development, located 280 feet
south of West Atlantic Avenue, 1,000 feet west of Military Trail (90 Coconut Key
Lane).
E. Approved with conditions (6 to 0, Sneiderman left the meeting), the architectural
elevation plan for Renaissance Village, a proposed 20-unit townhouse
development, located at the southeast corner of NE 6th Avenue (northbound
Federal Highway) and NE 2nd Street.
F. Approved with conditions (6 to 0), the architectural elevations for eight additional
models and clubhouse for Winterplace PUD, located at the southeast corner of
Military Trail and L-30 Canal, approximately 1/2 mile north of Lake Ida Road.
G. Approved (6 to 0), an internal adjustment associated with a Class II site plan
modification to allow a reduction in the separation between buildings from the
previously approved 24 feet to 23 feet for The Estuary II, located on Royal Palm
Boulevard, east of Federal Highway.
H. Approved with conditions (7 to 0, Sneiderman returned), a Class IV site plan
modification, landscape plan and architectural elevation plan associated with the
construction of a 31,141 square foot office building for LGB Office Building at
Delray Park of Commerce, located approximately 400' south of the intersection of
Congress Avenue and NW 17th Avenue.
Approved with conditions (7 to 0), a Class III site plan modification and landscape
plan associated with the construction of a 1,900 square foot mixed use building
known as the Bremmer Building, located on the east side of Federal Highway,
approximately 250 feet north of Bond Way. The architectural elevation plan was
tabled so that the applicant could address the provision of additional architectural
treatment.
Approved (6 to 0, Sloan absent), a request for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to modify a condition of approval to allow the replacement of
a wood fence with a PVC fence at '1'104 Nassau Street, located at the
southeast corner of Nassau Street and Gleason Street.
Approved (5 to 1, Jamison dissenting), a request for a Certificate of
Appropriateness associated with the demolition of a garage and construction
of an addition to contributing single family residence at 105 NE 7th Street,
City Commission Documentation
Appealable Items Meeting of October 2, 2001
Page 4
located on the north side of NE 7th Street, between North Swinton Avenue
and NE 2nd Avenue.
Approved (6 to 0), a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow a
change in the roof material from shingles to a standing seam cooper roof for a
contributing structure, located at 44 South Swinton Avenue.
Approved (6 to 0), a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow a
change in the roof material from shingles to a standing seam cooper roof and
replacement of the existing metal column with a tapered wood column for a
contributing structure at 40 Swinton Avenue.
Other Item
The Board tabled (6 to 0), making a recommendation to the Planning and
Zoning Board regarding an amendment to the Land Development
Regulations Section 2.2.6(B)"Composition and Special Qualifications" (for
Members of the Historic Preservation Board). The proposed changes seek to
ensure that the composition of the Board is comprised of a registered
architect, registered landscape architect and an individual with expertise in
the construction industry.
By motion, receive and file this report.
Attachment:
· Location Map
CI1Y OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
- City Commission Meeting -
October 2, 2001
GULF STREAM BI. VD
L-30 GANA~
C-15 CANAL
S.P.R.A.B.:
A. FI I~ET LEASE DISPOSAL, INC.
B. O'CONNOR'S PUB
C. SIDETRACK CAFE
D. COCONUT KEY
E. RENAISSANCE VILLAGE
F. WINTERPLACE PUD
G. THE ESTUARY II
H. LGB OFFICE BUILDING
I. BREMMER BUILDING
H.P.B.:
1. 1104 NASSAU STREET
2. 105 NE 7TH STREET
3. 44 SOUTH SWlNTON A VENUE
4. 40 SOUTH SWINTON A VENUE
N W 2ND ST
SW 2NDST ;
S.W
UNTON
......... cr~Y UMITS .........
ONE MILE
GRAPHIC SCALE
CiTY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
1999
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
CITY MANAGER ~
AGENDA ITEM (3" ~ - REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is before the City Commission to approve the award of the following bid and purchase awards:
Bid award in the amount of $758,382.00 to Insituform Technologies for trenchless sanitary
sewer rehabilitation utilizing the existing Manatee County contract unit prices. Funding is
available from 442-5178-536-63.51 (Sewer Mains).
Purchase award in the amount of $21,293.00 to Electric Motors of Palm Beach for two (2)
variable frequency drive units for replacement at Miller Park and the South Pump Station.
Funding is available from 441-5143-536-64.90 (Other Machinery/Equipment).
Approve a lease agreement for an annual cost of $38,541.12 with Enterprise Rent-A-Car to
support undercover operations by the Police Department's Vice, Intelligence and Narcotics
(VIN) Unit. Funding is available from 001-2115-521-44.40 (Vehicle Rental/Lease).
Contract renewal of various film and photographic supplies to Focus Camera at an estimated
annual cost of $17,216.59 via the City of Boca Raton Bid #98-110. Funding is available
from various departments' FY 2001-2002 operating budgets.
Purchase award to Special Products Group for the purchase of uniforms for the Police
Department at an estimated annual cost of $67,710.25. Funding is available from all
division's 52.22 (Uniforms/Linen Service) line items in the FY 2001-2002 budget.
Recommend approval of the bid and purchase awards listed above.
Ref.'B~d. Agmemo 10.02.01
City Of Delray Beach
Department of Environmental Services
M E M 0 R A N D
U
M
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
David T. Harden
City Manager
C. Danvers Beatty, P.E~_-~/-"~
Deputy Director of Pulyrfc Utilities
September 24, 2001
Rehabilitation of Gravity Sewer
Systems 83, 7, 8, & 3
Attached is an Agenda Request and supporting documentation for award of a contract to
Insituform Technologies, Inc. for trenchless sanitary sewer rehabilitation of 17,1 ! 2 feet of gravity
sewer. The specific areas identified for rehabilitation are as follows:
- System 83, Delray Shores Systems.
Systems 7 and 8 which are located between East Atlantic Avenue to the north, SE 5th
Street, to the south, North Bound Federal Highway to the west and the Intracoastal
Waterway to the east.
- System 03 which is located between NE 6th Avenue to the west, the Intracoastal waterway
to the east, NE 5th Street to the north and NE 2nd Street to the south.
The work will be performed based on unit prices from the existing Manatee County Contract on
file in the Purchasing Division. The total amount of this contract is $758,382.00 and funding is
available from R&R Account # 442-5178-536-63.51, Sewer Mains.
Please place this item on the October 2, 2001 Agenda for consideration by City Commission.
CDB/pd
CCi
Richard Hasko, P.E., Director of Environmental Services
Scott Solomon, Manager of Water/Sewer Network Division
City Clerks Office
Agenda File
\~ESSRV002XDavls\wwdataWlemo\C~ty ManagerLRehablhtat~on of Grawty Sewer doc
oq.O. l
I I
SYSTEM 83/DELRAY SHORES
TI
SYSTEM8 7-1-8
' '":' - ..... 020
ST2~ o23 i
3RD
)'mo
024
) 026
SYSTEM 3
o
u
E
~ ~ 0 0
0
0
0 0
o.
4~
C
0
E
o
o o
e0 o o
~ o o
0
O~ 0 0
cO
0
0
00 o
o o
0
U
~- ~0~ 0
0
0 0
~0
0 0 0
0 ~ O~
~- 0 0
O.
c c~ ~
oo~
c n,' c n,' c n,' c: n,' c n,' 'i c: 0 c: c ~ c
o ~ ~ o ~ ~ o, o ~
IN
AGENDA REQUEST
No.
Request to be placed on:
X Regular Agenda
__ Special Agenda
__ Workshop Agenda
Agenda Item t~7' (~ ' /
Date: September 24, 2001
When: October 2, 2001
Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Staff requests Commission award of a contract to
Insituform Technologies, Inc. for trenchless sanitary sewer rehabilitation of 17,112 feet of gravity sewer.
The work will be performed based on unit prices from the existing Manatee County Contract on file in the
Purchasing Division. The total amount of this contract is $758,382.00 and funding is available from
Account # 442-5178-536-63.51, Sewer Mains.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends award of a contract to Insituform Technologies, Inc. off the Manatee
County Contract in the amount of $758.382.00.
Department head signature: (~~~--~~~
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (r. gsl~ed on all items involving expenditure of funds):
~,~.<~-.~ Funding available~_..S~O
/A( ) \ I Funding alternative's----' (if applicable)
([~3~/, AccountNo. & Descrivtion ~0cZ-~l'q ~- ~[o./.0~-~1 ~ ~oAo~
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: ~0 ~
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
\~ESSRV002~Davls\wwdata~Forms~Agenda Requests~AgendaReq - Gravity Sewer doc
City Of Delray Beach
Department of Environmental Services
M E M 0 R A N D
U M
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
David T. Harden
City Manager
C. Danvers Beatty, P.E~'~"-~
Deputy Director of Pu~es
September 25, 2001
Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Units
Miller Park and South Pump Station
RECEIVED
SEP 2 5 2001
CITY MANAGER
Attached is an Agenda Request and Tabulation of Quotes for purchase of two variable frequency
drive units. These units will be installed at Miller Park and the South Pump Station and will
provide enhanced pressure stabilization for distribution system. Electric Motors of Palm Beach is
the apparent lowest responsive vender with a total proposal of $21,293.00.
Based on their proposal and satisfactory performance of past work in the City, we are
recommending award of the purchase to Electric Motors of Palm Beach in the total amount of
$21,293.00. Funding will be from Account #441-5143-536-64.90, Other Machinery and
Equipment
Please place this item on the October 2, 2001 Agenda for consideration by City Commission.
CDB/pd
CC:
Richard Hasko, P.E., Director of Environmental Services
Bob Bullard, Manager of Maintenance
City Clerks Office
Agenda File
U \wwdatahMcmo\C~ty Manager~Vhllcr Park & South Pumpstat~on doc
o o
0 o
cc) ~
o cc) 0
o cc) o
gg°
o o
o o
co o
~m -
o o ~
o o
o ~
o ~
o ~
o
Mar-13-01 O]:OSP Claude Gordon Sales 561 832 3538 P.01
Electric Motors of Palm E,each
Belvedere Rd West p,3h)~ Beach.
Ph 561.B~P-0233 Far 561-655 8814
Ftlx ¢o~r
Price _Q. ote
'Cerements: The f, dlewln~ potation is for yoor revi~
(I)
RSI-0?.';-h-4-12/Air t~,~, i~ioflt'd for 100bp 71~T~24 ~ ~'mn I! VFD.
~K h~ Ma; ~m m. 125 m~ vm~ ~ M ~r e~d~r, 2k, t~mro~er wilk
wiH~ ea~ ~ dr ~ ~ un~.
Cost SI 1.140J~O
(2) lSI-0iO*h-4-1l/Air cud itio~cd fo,' ?Skp motor..~AdfA* $PE~',45 AflT)I"F.
Max t~rrent 110 BpL
Kaman Industrial Tectmologl~ Corpomaon
5609 Adarrm Drive
Tempa Florida 33619
Tel: (813) 628-4404 Fax: (813) 628.0425
To:
ILAMAN
Robert BuIlard - Ma~ntence Manager
City of Delray Beach (Ph) $61-243-7306 (Fax) $61-243-7344
From: Juan R. Gonzalcz
Electrical Engineer
Ref: Proposal 18230101 Rev -"" City of Delmy Beach
Date: 3-16-2001 Page: 1 of 2
Systems will Consist of:
Painted Steel Floor Standing Enclosure with Air Condition with the following mounted on front:
Start & Stop Pushbutton, Speed Potentiometer, Auto-Off-Manual Selector Switch, Drive
Keypad, Terminals for customer tie-in to Drive Running and 4-20ma Analog Speed Input
Special Notes:
There are a few ways to quote this, I am quoting ALL Ways:
1. Variable torque or Constant Torque
Variable Torque VFD's are used when for specific applications (Pump, Fan, etc.)
Constant Torque VFD's are used in all application relating to the Motor
2. With an Air Conditioner or Withom - I inspected all (3) Facilities and I am Confident
A Dust-Tight Force Ventilated Enclosure will keep the unit cool and dust-free.
1. Benshaw Variable Torque Inverter with MC, Enclosure Size 70"x30"xlS'
_, .... ___.~'-- L"d_-:: ~'-, .... ~ ..... :-~ .... o ~- ....... -'-- 2_l':~r" ........................ ~
b) 75bp Drive System for existing 87ila Motor- "Miller Park". ............................ $10,750.00
c) 100bp Drive System for existing 123tla Motor- "South Pump Station". ............. $12,750.00
2. Bensbaw Variable Torque Inverter Without MC, Enchsure Size 48"x36"xlS" on Feet
a) 60bp Drive System for existing 75fla Motor - "Owen Baker". .......................... $ 6,050.00
b) 75hp Drive System for existing 87fla Motor - "Miller Park". ........................... $ 7,600.00
c)lO0hp Drive System for existing 123fla Motor- "South Pump Station" .............. $ 9,250.00
3. Relianee Electric Constant Torque Inverter with A/C, Enclosure Size 87"x34"x24"
a) 60hp Drive System for existing 75fla Motor - "Owen Baker". .......................... $ 9,250.00
b) 75bp Drive System for existing 87fla Motor - "Miller Park". ............................ $11,750.00
c)100hp Drive System for existing 123fla Motor-"South Pump Station". ............. $12,575.00
4. Reliance Electric Constant Torque Inverter Without MC, Enelosure Size 87"x34"x24'
a) 60bp Drive System for existing 75fla Motor - "Owen Baker". .......................... $ 7,850.00
b) 75bp Drive System for existing 87fla Motor - "Miller Park". ............................ $ 9,775.00
c)100hp Drive System for existing 123fla Motor- "South Pump Station" .............. $ 9,995.00
Notes:
1. Cost includes: Shipping to Delray Beach, Maa-_a!s~ Drawings and wiring schematics.
2. (1) Eight Hour Day Start-Up Assistance Included At Delray Beach Location
3. Delivery 5-8 weeks ARO
$OUTHEASTERN PUMP
March 20, 2001
City of Delray Beach
434 South Swinton Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Attention: Mr. Clayton Gilbert
Subject: VFD CONTROLS FOR WATER BOOSTER PUMP STATIONS
Following our recenl site visit, and reviewing your request, we are pleased to offer the
following controllers. Unfortunately, we cannot guarantee the performance of the existing
motors as they appear to have been rewound; we recommend you review this issue with the
service center which performed the work.
SIMPLEX VFD CONTROL CENTER
o NEMA 12 Enclosure
o 48'x36"x16" Enclosure Size plus 24" Legs for Floor Mounting
o Enclosure Forced Air Ventilation (with filters), with minimum 30% safety factor
o Square D Model ATV58 Variable Torque Design VFD
o Incoming Une Side Fuses as Specified by Square D
o Control Transformer for 120V Control Circuit Power
o Local-Off-Remote Control Selector Switch
o Motor 'Run' status Auxiliary Contact
o Drive Speed Analog Output Signal Contact
o U.L. Usted and Labeled per U.L 508A as an Assembled Unit
o Assembled Unit to be factory assembled, wired, and load tested prior to shipment
PRICE:
SOUTH PUMP STATION (100hp)
MILLER PARK
$14,935.00
$13,160.00
Prices are valid for 60 days from date of quotation.
Pdces do not include sales lax.
F.O.B. - Delray Beach
Payment due 30 Days from date of invoice.
Thank you for this opportunity to quote your requirements. Please advise us with any
questions, or if we may receive your valued order.
Sincerely,
SOUTHEASTERN PUMP
PO Box 100727 · Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33310 · 1368 SW 12th Avenue · Pompano Beach, FL 33069
Phone (954) 781-8400 · Toll Free (800) 396-4182 · Fax {954) 781-8434 · www. sepump.com
BrowslKl:
F~x:
(964)
Hydro Pumps, Inc.
P.O. Box 16295 6512 NW 13th Court
Plantation. FL 33318
March 12, 2001
Toll Free (FL) 1-800-306-7867
Delray Environmental
434 South Swinton Ay.
Delray Beach, IR, 33444
Via Fax (561) 243-7344
Att~: Robert Bullnrd
Subject: VFD #3 Miller Park
Gendemen,
We propose to furnish nmi deliver thc following equipment:
Square D Ali/var Variable Frcqucncy Drive suitable for powcring motors
(VFD #1 75bp) drivin8 a centrifugal pump at variable speeds ~rom g0% to 100%
full load speed. Units will bc assembled in an enclosure NEMA 12 enameled steel
(with legs) 70" high x 24" wide x 16" deep, including an externally roof mourned
air conditioner rated 4800BTU and a power conversion transt'ormet mounted inside
one leg.
Comained within the cabinet will be & power terminal fanning block, circuit
protection for the auxiliary circuits, equipment ground, data terminal strip and
wiring to the door mounted key pad, H.O-A and manual specd pot.
Customer to supply 4-20 DC for autonmic pacing of'the VFD.
1 day start up service per unit is indudcd in the cost.
TOTAL PRICE S~
Delivery 4-5 weeks
Note: Duc to the availability of only one power source, the air con&tioner being
single phase, will result in a maximum current incrense of 3 nmpcres on two of the
three less when measured at the respective motor control center.
Ed Canter
Browafcl:
Fox:
(~S4) S83-3303
C9S4) S83~33QS
Hydro Pumps, Inc.
P.O. Box 1629~ 6S12 NW 13th Court
Plantation, FL :33318
M~'r,h 12, 2001
Toll Free (FL.) 1.800-306-7867
Delray Environmental
434 South Swinton Ay.
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Via lax (561) 243-7344
Attn: Robert Bullard
Subject: VFD #1 South Pump Station
We propose to furnish and deliver the following equipmeni:
Square D Aliiva~ VariabteFrequency Drive suitable for poweiin8 motors
(VFD #! lOOhp) driving a centrifugal pump at variable speeds from 80% to 100%
full load speed. Units will be assembled in an enclosure NEMA 12 enameled steel
(with Icgs) 70" high x 24" wide x 16" deep, including an externally roof mounted
air conditioner rated 4$00BTU and a power conversion transformer mounted inside
one leg
Contained within the cabinet will be a power terminal fannin~ block, circuit
protection for the auxiliary circuits, equipment ground, data te,,,;nal strip and
wiring to the door mounted key pad, H-O-A and manual speed pot.
Customer m mppl~ 4-20 DC for automatio pacing of the VFD.
I day start up service per unit is included in the cost
TOTAL PRICE S14.,955.50
Delivery 4-5 weeks
Note: Due to the availability of only one power source, the air conditioner being
single phase, will result in a maximum current increase of 3 amperes on two of the
three legs when measured at the respective motor control center.
Sinc.~rdy,
EC/vp
TOT;~I_ P. ~
III
o~' o~ ~ Beach
P~ 561-243-7306
F~ 561-243-7344
March 28, 2001
QUOTATION
One air conditioned enclosure with 75 HP VFD 14673.00
One ah-conditioned enclosure with IOOHP VFD 10015.00
AU enclosurus are DQI~wYA 12 flee stnndins 72"1=[ 36"W I8"D with hin~m~ pskL. ted, Iockabio door.
All air condithmi~ units ~e 3:~0BTU. All VPD units are Saftroni~ whi~ are _~b__ by Yaskawain
connect renM~ coetrols and indicator% transfom~er and beakers for AC unit
4-20 ma pncin~ sis~mmai, 4-20 ma feecback sisnal, off, run and fail indica6ons.
Delivery is six vn~eks afar receipl ~f ordsr because enclosuxe delivel~ is vu¥ slow. VI~ units are st~-k in
Ft. Myers and usually ta~e about three days to deliwr.
Tlmnk you w"ry much for your inqui~, your business is Smatly aplxaciated.
Will follow this fax wi~h hard copy.
Har-21-O! 02:01P P.01
March 21, 2~1'1
Clayton Gilbert
City of Delray Beach
Public Utilities Department
434 S. Swinton ^~,e.
Delray Beach, }:L 3,'H44
Fax # 561/243.7.344
Dear Clayton:
Good afternoon.
Pursuant to my conversation this morning with Jeff Foy, AMJ will not be
submitting a proposal on the request for variable frequency drives. However, we
appreciated the opportunity.
If you should have any questions, applications, or require additional m formation
please do not hesitate to contact me or one of our inside sales representatives on
our direct sales lines. Our telephone number is (941)682-4,500 or 800-881 - 1487.
Please .',ee our website at http://www.amjequipment.com for more m~ormation.
Sincerely,
Michael Parnell
Sales Representative
AMJ Fquipment ('orporalion · PO, Box 1648, Lak,.land, FI .t3~2 · 2700 h~[er~.tatl, Dr~e, Lakel.md, FI '~3,~)5
~XI-.'K'~I-I&87 ,, 80:~24~1 · Fa~ ,~3,./,a,1741077 · www.amjc~jrup~t~ez~! corn
AGENDA REOUEST O~O .~
No.
Request to be placed on:
X Regular Agenda
__ Special Agenda
__ Workshop Agenda
Agenda Item
Date: September 25, 2001
When: October 2, 2001
Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Staff requests Commission approval of a purchase
from Electric Motors of Palm Beach for two variable frequency drive units (one at Miller Park, one at South
Pump Station) in the amount of $21,293.00. Funding is available from Account #441-5143-536-64.90,
Other Machinery and Equipment.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of purchase from Electric Motors of Palm Beach.
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
BudgetDirector Review (r~ed on all items involving expenditure of funds):
Funding availabl~O
,\Funding alternatives ~ . (if, applicable)
Account No. & Description L~14}- ~}t4 ~--~3(o. (,oq- ~0 ~ ~fi~ ~
x Account Bal~ce 3 4b,qO~ ' ~
Ci~ Manager Review: ~
Approved for agenda: ~O
Hold Umil:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
\~ESSRV002~Davas\wwdata~Fonns~Agenda Requests~AgendaReq - Mailer Park doc
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
David Harden, City Manager
Jacklyn~Purchasing Superviso~
Joseph S~fo~~e Director
September 27, 2001
DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING
OCTOBER 02, 2001 - APPROVAL FOR ANNUAL
LEASE OF VEHICLES FOR UNDERCOVER
OPERATIONS FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
Item Before Commission:
City Commission is requested to approve award to Enterprise Rent-A-Car for an annual lease for
six (6) vehicles for the Police Department for Undercover Operations for the department's Vice,
Intelligence and Narcotics (VIN) Unit for a total of $38,541.12.
Background:
The Delray Beach Police Department currently uses Mears Motors Leasing of Orlando and the
vendor has notified the Police Department that they would be increasing their prices. Therefore,
the Police Department requested quotes from three (3) vendors. Prices received are as follows
(copies attached):
Enterprise Rent-a-Car
Mears Motor Leasing
Interamerica Car Rental
$3,211.76 per month
$3,390.00 per month
$4,350.00 per month
The Administrative Services Director of the Delray Beach Police Department recommends award
to Enterprise Rent-A-Car per attached memo dated 09/26/01.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval to Enterprise Reat-A-Car for an annual lease for six (6) vehicles for
the undercover operations for a total cost of $38,541.12. Funding from account code 001-2115-
521-44.40.
Attachments:
Memo From Police Dept.
Quotes Received
Delray Beach olice Department
300 West Atlantic Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444-3695
(561) 243-7888 Fax (561) 243-7816 1993 ®
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Robert A. Barcinski
Acting City Manage~("
David Junghans~/,\
Administrative Senti~Dimctor
September 26, 2001
SUBJECT: AGENDA REQUEST
The Delray Beach Police Department has requested that the attached Consent
Agenda go before the Commission on September 26, 2001 for approval.
The annual lease of vehicles to support undercover operations by the
Department's Vice, Intelligence and Narcotics (VIN) Unit is due to expire between
October 24th and November 7, 2001. Mears Motor Leasing of Orlando currently
holds the lease. Because of an increase in their leasing rates we were forced to
look for an alternative source.
The enclosed documentation provides three pdce quotes from separate vendors.
The Delray Beach Police Department is recommending the award go to
Enterprise Rent-A-Car, who has provided the City of Delray Beach with the best
pricing for the required vehicles.
Should you require further information, please contact me at ext. 7852.
DJIrmh
Attachment
Og/20/O1 08:I~5__F. AX 1954481~220 ENTERPRISE FLEET SVCS ~ 007
CITY OF DELR Y BEACH POLICE
DEPARTMENT
FLEET RATES
STOCK ORDER: 0 FACI~RY OP.D~,R:( XX )
Vehicle Description: 2002 CHRYSLER SEBRING 4OR SEDAN LX
4 SPEED AUTOMATIC, AM/FM STEREO
RADIO WITH COMPACT DISC, CASSETTE
LEASE PARAMETERS:
Lease Term:
Miles per month:
Monthly Rate:
Overmileage Charge:
FLEET I¥[a, HAGEMEi~r.. SERVICES:
12 Month
2.000 mile~
392.s2- X'
cents per mile
ACCEPTED: (X)
$ s4.oa-* ()
$ 5.75 ( )
$ 34.98-** ( )
$ zoo ( )
Fleet Iflauranoe:
Maintenance Managemen~
Full Maintenance:
Fleet Fuel Program:
'Tax not included
**lrmurance rote based on $1.000,000 ~ability coverage, acceptable loss mn histo;y and motor vehicle
repora~ Co~on and Comprehensive deducab~s $500/500 resistively.
**'Full Maintenance includes 2.000 miles per month up to 100.000 miles maximum, with maintenance
ov~rmileage cha~ed et 3.5 ce~ts per mlle.
Full Maintenance include~ 0 sets of brakes (1 se~ = I axle), 0 Tiros. No Loaner Vehicle
I do hereby auffmr/ze this vehj~/e order.
Pdnt Name Signature Date
** Lessor shall have the Hght In the event Lmmee ~dmuld fall o~ r~ut~ to accept the
ordered vehk~le to coll~-t Ilqu~ damage~.
"Above shown rental will tm adjusted blmed on ntanufaoturer'8 prices and the prime
lending rate in effect M the time of vehicle delivery,
--Please allow 8-12 w~eks for l:lelive~ of factory Ordered units
"Above rate based on approved credit.
09750/01 08:16 FAX 19544811220 ENTERPRISE FLEET SVCS ~009
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH POLICE
DEPARTMENT
FLEET RATES
Vehicle Description:
P~L~r~Rs:
Lease Term:
Miles per month:
Monthly Rate:
Overmileage Charge:
FL~T ,MANAeE.;~rr S,=RWC~S:
Fleet I~umn~:
~in~nan~ ~~
Full ~i~n~:
Fl~t Fuel P~mm:
2002 DODDE DURANGO 4 DR SLT,
4 SPEED AUTOMATIC
12 Month
2,000 miles
,14 cents per mile
ACCEPTED: (X)
100.62-* ( )
535 ( )
37.00-' ( )
2,00 ( )
*'Insurance mt~ b~ed crt $1.000.000 liatx*lRy coverage, acceptable ~ run hlskxy and motor vehicle
repor~ C~ioa and Comprehensive deductibles $500,'500 ~.
"'Full Maintenance includes 2,000 miles per rn~dh uptO 100,0~0 miles mmdmurn, with maintenance
ov~rmlleage charged at. 3.5 ce~ts I~r mile.
Full Maintenance includes: 0 sets of brakes (1 set = 1 axle). 0 Tire% No Loaner Vehicle
I do hereby authorize this vehicle order
Ouar~y~
Print Name Signature Date
"Lessor shall have the right In the event Lmmee should fail or refuse to accept the
ordered vehicle to colle,:t liquMated damage~.
~Above ~hown rental will be adJllsted based on manufactumr~a pd~e~ and the prime
lending rat~ in effect at the time of Yehie. ie dMIvMy.
'"'PW dlow 8-12 weeks for delivery of factory, ordered units
"Above n~e based on approved crediL
09'/'20/01 08:16 FAX 19544811220
ENTERPRISE FLEET SVCS
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH POLICE
DEPARTMENT
FLEET RATES
STOCX Olmm~: 0 l~Acrogr OaDm~:( XX )
VehiGle Descdption:
LPg,SE P,KRAM .EmRS:
Lea~e Term:
Mites per month:
2002 FORD F-150 CREW CAB 139' XLT. 4
SPEED AUTOMATIC, CLOTH FRONT 40/60
SPLIT BENCH SEAT
12 Month
2,000 miles
Monthly Rate:
Overmileage Charge:
FLEET B~Id~GEMENT SERVICES:
Fleet In~uranGe:
Maintenanc~ Management:
Full Maintenan~e:
Fleet F~
~l'ax nol Included
551.24' /~' o~- - ~'// .10 ~ents per mile
ACCEPTED: (X)
100.62" ( )
5.75 ( )
37.00'** ( )
2.00 ( )
**lnsmance rote bar, ed on $1.000,000 liability coverage, aoceplable loss run history and motor vehicle
reports. Collision and Comprehensive dedu~bles $500/500 respedively.
'"Full Maintenance includes 2,000 miles per month up to 100,000 miles maximum, with maintenance
overmileage cha~d at 3.5 cents per mile.
Full Maintenence includes: 0 sels of brekes (1 se~ = 1 axle), 0 'i-~es, No Loaner Vehicle
I do hereby authorize this veh/~/e
......
Print Name Signature
"Lessor ~hnll have the fight in the event Leer, ee should fall or mfu~ to aceelX the
ordered vehicle to collect liquidated damages.
--'AbOve shown rental will be adjusted based on manufaetumr~ prices and the prime
lending rate in effect at the time of vehicle delivery.
"Please allow 8-12 weeks for deUvery of factory ordenKJ unas
--Above rate b~ed on approved cmdlL
08/03/01
10:08 "~'4075784924 MEARS LEASING
~ 002,'006
August 2, 2001
Lt. Scott Lunsford
City of Delray Beach Police Dept.
300 W. Atlantic Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Lt. Scott:
We would l~e to "thank you" for your participation in our 2000-2001 Undercover Program. Due to
significant changes m the market place and the slow down in the economy, we are a little late in the
calendar year in ammuncing the 2001-2002 pro,am.
After much research and market analysis, we offer the following: (See Attached List)
2001-20002 Undercover Program.
S~g~tlv Used Vehicles
Term 12 months
Mileage Allowance 2,000 miles per month, per vehicle
Over Mileage $0.12 per mile
Automobiles & Vans Trucks & SUVs
$520.00 per month, per vehicle $550.00 per month, per vehtcle
MEARS
MOTOR
LEASING
New Vehicles
Term 12 months
Mileage Allowance 1660 miles per month, per vehicle
Over Mileage $0.12 per mile
Automobiles Full Size Trucks, SUV's & Vans
$550.00 I~_r month, per vehicle $595.00 per month, per vehicle
iqo,oO
X o2=~/,/°°'o° X a -: 7j
Compnct Trucks & SUVs
s55o.00 p~ mo.th, pet ve~)e~ =S/, / 00. O~
We will quote the 4x4's on an individual basis, as their costs ~e too prohibitive to include in the group
pricing.
As in the past, we offer a $15.00 to $20.00 per month, per vehicle discount if the billing is pre-paid
annually.
Again, we thank you for your business and look forward to your continued pa~xonage for the up-coming
year.
David R. Pickard
Senior Account Executive
VEHICLES · EQUIPMENT o SALES
3905 EL REY ROAD, ORLANDO, FL. 32808 - FAx 407-578-4924 - PHONE 407-298-2982
wWW. M E^RSLEAS lNG. COU
August Z3, Z0q)l
Delra¥ Police Department
AL'tn: Captain Mark Oavts
Page 2
Given the nature of ~e use of these vehicles, TnterAmp_dcen Is f~lly aware af the need for cor~denUallL'y and will do
ever~,~tng In its power to ensure same.
B2LLTNG AND PAYMENT
Oelray Poli~ Department will Issue a purchase order to caver orders under I~ls contra~ [nterAmerlcan will Ir~volce on a
monthly basis and expect payment of same within I~n (10) days following usage period beln9 billed,
MODXFICAT~O~ OF VEHZCLES
b~terAmerlcen Specifically agrees that Delray Poll<~ Department mey, at It'S OWrl expeJ-ise; apply tinUng to the windows of
any contract vehicle. The C)elrartmenl: may also, at It's own e~pense, Install any electronics equipment I1: may deem
neo~_~ry providing said Installatlorl shall cause no 13ermanent damage to vehicle. (I.e. h~les in sheet metal or dashboar~
area of car).
CARGROUPS
GROUP ! - I~OSZZ'E
NLSSAN ALI'b~A
PONT GRAND AM
CHEVY MAL]BU
K]A OPTIMA
GROUP tf. FULLS~ZE
NISSAN MAX/MA
OLDS ALERO
~IC~
CHEVY LUMINA, ~OflT~ CARLO, IMPALA
PONT BONNEVILLE, GRAflD PRDC
TOYO CAMRY
FORD TAURUS
GROUP ZZZ - SPEC/ALTY
FONT FIREBIRD
CHEVY C. AMA~O
FORD MUSTANG
$630.00 PER NONTH
$685.00 PER MONTH
GROUP 1¥ - IN~EMZUM
I TNCOI. N TOWNCAR
CADILLAC DEV]LLE
FORD EXPEOrrloN
CHEVY TAHOE, SUBURBAN
GKOUP V - I~/KIVANS I SUV
C)4EVY vENTURE, BLAZI~,, T~LN:KER
FORD EXPLOREP~ SPORT TRACK, W]NDSTAR, ESCAPE
NL~=AN X'TERRA
GROUP VZ - I~CK UP TRUCKS
~bmT for your acceptance,
IL BYRD, v.P. ~
INTE1Ub~FJU~___,~rJ~R RENTAL, INC.
$9g0.00 PER MONTH
J:
A~pted and
Captain Mark I:xavIs
Date
~0~ O£T'ON 908L£P~T9ST + N~DI~BW~BINI 8T:~T T~O~/LT/60
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: September 26, 2001
Request to be placed on:
X Consent Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda
When: September 26,
2001
Description of agenda item: This is for the annual lease of vehicles to support undercover
operation by the Department's Vice, Intelligence & Narcotics (VIN) Unit. Meats Motor Leasing of
Orlando currently holds the lease. However, because of an increase ~n the;r leasing rates we
were forced to look for an alternative source. Enterprise Rent-a-Car has provided the City of
Delray Beach with the best pricing for the required vehicles.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED:
Draft of Resolution Attached:
Recommendation: Approval
YES NO X
YES NO X
City Attomey Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review
(required on all items involving expenditure of funds):
Funding available: Yes X No
Funding altematives (if
applicable):
City Manager Review:
Account Number:
Account Description:
Account Balance:
Approved for Agenda:
001-2115-521-44.40
Vehicle Rental/Lease
$40,320.00 (F/Y 2001-02 Budget)
No
Hold Until:
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
David Harden, City Manager
Jacklyn~Purchasing Supervisor
Joseph Saf~t~,f~nance Director
September 27, 2001
DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING
OCTOBER 02, 2001 CONTRACT RENEWAL
FURNISH AND DELIVERY OF PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
VIA CITY OF BOCA RATON BID #98-110
Item Before Commission:
City Commission is requested to approve the contract renewal with Focus Camera for the
purchase of photographic supplies at an estimated annual cost of $17,216.59 via the City of Boca
Raton Bid #98-110.
Background:
The City of Boca Raton is the lead agency for this joint bid with the City of Delray Beach which
was approved in 1998 by the City of Delray Beach Commission. These items are required by
various departments on an "as needed basis" and the most commonly items are stored in the
Purchasing Warehouse.
The City of Boca Raton has extended this contract for another year. This renewal was awarded
at the Boca Raton Council meeting of September 25, 2001. See attached supporting
documentation from City of Boca Raton.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends the contract renewal with Focus Camera Inc. for a total estimated annual
usage of $17,216.59. Funding from various departments 2001-2002 operating budget.
Attachments:
City of Boca Raton Council Agenda
City of Delray Beach Year 2000 Agenda Awards
PURCHASING BOCa R~TON Fax:561-393-?983 Sep 27 '01 9:01
CITY HAL[_ - ?O1 WEST PA[ METTO PA~qK ROAD · BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33432-3795 - PHONE: (561) 393-7700
(FOR HEARING IMPAIRED) TDD' (561)3~7-7046
&UNCOM. (561) 022-7700
]NTERNET: www c~ boca-raton fl u~
P. 02
September 27, 2001
City of Delray Beach
Jackie Rooney, Purchasing Supervisor
100 N.W 1 ~ Avenue
Delray Beach, FI. 33444
RE. Renewal of Bid No. 98-110, Photographic Supplies
On September 25, 2001, the Boca Raton City Council approved the third and final renewal of
the Photographic Supply contract with Focus Camera with no changes to unit pricing. The
council action number is 03-E-06 and the renewal period is 9/24/01 through g/23102.
Attached for your file is the Council Approval Procurement Recommendation and the signed
agreement to renew letter from Focus Camera. Please call me at 393-7872 or E-mad me at
nhalloran.~__~c~ boca-raton f_l ~u_s ~f you have any questions
Sincerely,
y Plalibfah, CPPEI
Buyer
-- AN F.~UAL OPI~II~TUNITY £¥PL~OY£R
PURCHRSIN6 BOCR RRTON Fax:561-393-?983
Sap 27 '01 9:02 P. 04
Jul 17 '01 14:~r'J P. O1
June 26. 2001
Focus Cm,,re
g05 MeDo~GId Avenue
B~Ely~, NY 1[;la
.~UBJECT:
Bid No_ g&110, ~lc Supplies
Renewal Optlm No. 3
Dear Mr, $ill~r:
Our bid referenced above ea~ma ~rnber .'~t. 2~01. ~ a~dfied in ~e bid.
o~1~ m ~ ~ misting ~ ~ ~o~r o~eqear ~rl~ if K is mu~a8y ~e~e
p~
Please aa'visa by signature beirut,. [ a ona..~a¢ e~tenslon of our current contract et prices
stated in your bl¢l datea Auguat 3, l'l~J~ woul¢l I~ acceptable.
Plee=~e template and retUrn thie'fefm te ~ ~~g D~l~ J~ 6,2~1. Your ~
may ~ fa~d u,~ C~ F~-d~r ~G4~3-~ w~ the a~l and ~y ~uimd
a~chmen~ mail~ to the m~ ~m. ~ G~ ~11 also n~ ~ hsu~ ~
(Wo~em Combination, ~ ~b~, a~ Auto Ineumnm) wl~ ~e C~ named aa an
a~nal Ing~d f~r ~ne~ U'~.
I~reby agree to n ona-~ll~' e~elIM~ll ef the subject bid_
.I mm ~na_bl~ e~end the, ~id ~o~ f Dr an Id dltloNil or m-year period.
1-11.el
Name (Pnnt) I T~le ' ';: I
AGENDAITEM NUMBER:
AGENDA REQUEST
Request to be placed on: October 02, 2001
Date: September 27, 2001
XX Consent Agenda
Special Agenda
__ Workshop Agenda
Description of agenda item:
Contract renewal with Focus Camera for the purchase of various film and photographic supplies
for an estimated annual usage of $17,216.59 via the City of Boca Raton Bid #98-110.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES
Draft Attached: YES
NO
NO
Recommendation:
Award the contract renewal of various film and photographic supplies to Focus Camera at an
estimated annual cost of $17,216.59 via the City of Boca Raton Bid #98-110. Funding from
various departments 2001-2002~
Department Head Signature:~--------'~- ~'~-----~~ L_..._-., ~-~ ~
'-'- \" ',
Determination of Consistency witlr~'~ ensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all. i~e_m_s,involving expenditure of funds):
Funding available: Yes ~ f No
Funding alternatives:
Account Description:
Account Balance:
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda:
Hold Until:
(if applicable)
~ No
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action: Approved Disapproved
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
David Harden, City Manager
Jacklyn Rooney, Purchasing Supervisor
Joseph ~~"~ce Director
September 28, 2001
DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING
OCTOBER 02, 2001 - BID AWARD - PURCHASE OF
UNIFORMS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT -
ANNUAL CONTRACT
Item Before Commission:
City Commission is requested to approve award to Special Products Group for the purchase of
uniforms for the Delray Beach Police Department at an estimated annual cost of $67,710.25.
Background:
Bids were received on September 19, 2001 from two (2) vendors all in accordance with City
purchasing policies and procedures. (Bid #2001-42. Documentation on file in the Purchasing
Office.) A tabulation of bids is attached for your review.
The Administrative Services Director for the Delray Beach Police Department has reviewed the
bids received and samples of uniforms submitted and recommends award to the low bidder,
Special Products Group, per attached memo dated 09/24/01. This bid was a re-bid of Bid
#2001-20 which was cancelled by Commission due to changes in the specifications.
Recommendation:
Purchasing Staff recommends award to Special Products Group for the purchase of uniforms for
the Delray Beach Police Department for at estimated annual cost of $67,710.25. Funding from
account codes 001-2111-521-52.22, 001-2113-521-52.22, 001-2115-521-52.22, 001-2117-521-
52.22, 001-2119-521-52.22, and 001-2121-521-52.22.
Attachments:
Memo From Police Department
Tabulation of Bids
ODELRAY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
300 W~5s~ ~l;z~t:~_c6A2v;~ u.e;axD(e~ r6a~)B2e4a~_hT,8F~633444 ~Jl-AmedcaC~
1993
2001
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Jackie Rooney
Purchasing Supervisor
FROM:
David Junghans ¢~
Administrative Services Director
DATE:
September 24, 2001
SUBJECT: UNIFORM ANNUAL CONTRACT
The Police Department recommends that the City select Special Products Group,
over J. R. Manno Uniforms and Police Equipment as the Department uniform
provider. Special Products Group bid best meets the overall Department
requirements. They provided pricing on all requested items; Manno's did not.
Manno's only provided pricing on two items, and in both cases there were higher
than the prices quoted by Special Products Group.
Additionally, the Department requests that this bid and quote package be placed
on the October, 2nd City of Delray Beach Counsel Consent Agenda.
Should there be any questions, or should the City require additional information,
please call me at extension, 7852, or e-mail me at, JUNGHANS~,CI.delray-
beach.fi.us
DJ/rmh
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
PURCHASE OF UNIFORMS FOR
DELRAY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
BID # 2001-42
DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2001
Special Products J.R. Manno Uniforms
ITEM # DESCRIPTION QTY Group & Police Equipment!
I 'Long Sleeve Shirt 30 $29.50 ea.
Lady-Plain, Zipper $885.00 No Bid
10fficers/Supervisors
Oversize 4 $29.50 ea.
$118.00 No Bid
2 Long Sleeve Shirt 200 $29.50 ea.
Men - Plain, Zipper $5,900.00 No Bid
Officers/Supervisors
Oversize 70 $29.50 ea.
$2,065.00 No Bid
3 Short Sleeve Shirt 60 $25.50 ea.
Lady $1,530.00 No Bid
Officers/Supervisors
Oversize 8 $25.50 ea.
$204.00 No Bid
4 Short Sleeve Shirt 400 $27.50 ea.
Men $11,000.00 No Bid
Officers/Supervisors
Oversize 280 $27.50 ea.
$7,700.00 No Bid
5 Pants 300 $30.75 ea.
Male $9,225.00 No Bid
Officers/Supervisors
Oversize 100 $30.75 ea.
$3,075.00 No Bid
6 Pants 45 $30.75 ea.
Female $1,383.75 No Bid
Officers/Supervisors
Oversize 6 $30.75 ea.
$184.50 No Bid
7 Jacket 25 $94.00 ea.
Male/Female $2,350.00 No Bid
See Attachment B
Ref:s:\finance\purchasing\Police Uniforms xlslsdl19119101 Page I of 2
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
PURCHASE OF UNIFORMS FOR
DELRAY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
BID # 2001-42
DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2001
SpeciaIProducts J.R. Manno Uniforms
ITEM tl DESCRIPTION QTY Group & Police Equipment
8 Jacket (Windbreaker) 75 $19.50 ea.
Male/Female $1,462.50 No Bid
9 Sweater 35 $39.00 ea.
Male/Female $1,365.00 No Bid
10 Tie 40 $2.75 ea.
Male/Female $110.00 No Bid
11 P.E.S. Shirts 25 $21.50 ea.
Short Sleeves $537.50 No Bid
Male/Female See Attachment C
12 C.O.P. Shirts 500 $21.50 ea.
Short Sleeves $10,750.00 No Bid
Male/Female
13 BDU Trouser 50 $21.50 ea.
Twill $1,075.00 No Bid
Male/Female
14 BDU Trouser 100 $21.50 ea.
Ripstop $2,150.00 No Bid
Male/Female
15 Cargo Short 125 $29.00 ea. $30.00 ea.
Patrol Stretch $3,625.00 $3,750.00
Male
16 Cargo Short 35 $29.00 ea. $30.00 ea.
Patrol Stretch $1,015.00 $1,050.00
Female
GRAND TOTAL $67,710.25 $4,800.00
Delivery Time as Specified
in Bid Specification? Yes Yes
Will Extend Same Prices, Terms
and Conditions to other
Governmental Entities? Yes Yes
Ref. s:\finance\purchasing\Pohce Uniforms.xlslsdl/9119101. Page 2 of 2
City Of Delray Beach
Bid #2001-42
ATTACHMENT "A"
Manufacturer Style Number:
Item # 1
Item # 2
Item # 3
Item # 4
Item # 5
Item # 6
Item # 7
Item # 8
Item # 9
Item # 10
Item # 11
Item # 12
Item # 13
Item # 14
Item # 15
Item # 16
(Navy) Flying Cross #127R7886Z
(Navy) Flying Cross #34W7886Z
(Navy) Flying Cross #177R7886Z
(Navy) Flying Cross #87R7886Z
Fechheimer #34200
Fechheimer #34250
Fechheimer #58120
Auburn #201
Fechheimer #801
S. Broome #90010
(Ladies) Flying Cross #176R5441
(Ladies) Flying Cross ¢176R5435
Propper International #706
Propper International #370
Sportif #630170
Sporti'f ¢630270
(White) Flying Cross #126R7800Z
(White) Flying Cross ¢33W7800Z
(White) Flying Cross #176R7800Z
(White) Flying Cross ¢85R7800Z
(Mens) Flying Cross ¢85R5441
(Mens) Flying Cross #85R5435
2116 Corporate Dr, ive · Boynton Beach..~ Florida 33426
Office: 561-732-0360 · Toll Free: 877-500-8990 · Fax: 561-732-0879
City Of Delray Beach
Bid #2001-42
ATTACHMENT "B"
Optional zip out full sleeve Thinsulate liner is available for purchase with the
Jacket in Item #7
Liner is Fechheimer Style # 32740
Price Each: $36.50
2116 Corporate Drive o.;Boynton Beach, Florida 33426
Office: 561-732-0360 · Toll Free: 877-500-8990 · Fax: 561-732-0879
City Of Delray Beach
Bid #2001-42
ATTACHMENT "C"
We did not include a sample of Item #11. The item we are bidding is exactly the
same as the sample submitted for item #12. The only difference is the color.
2116 Corporate Drive · .Boynton Beach, Florida 33426
Office: 561-732-0360 · Toll Free: 877-500-8990 · Fax: 561-732-0879
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
AGENDA REQUEST
Request to be placed on: October 02, 2001
Date: September 28, 2001
XX Consent Agenda
Special Agenda
__ Workshop Agenda
Description of agenda item:
Award of Bid #2001-42 to Special Products Group for the purchase of uniforms for the Delray
Beach Police Department at an estimated annual cost of $67,710.25.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES
Draft Attached: YES
NO
NO
Recommendation:
Award of Bid #2001-42 to Special Products Group for the purchase of uniforms for the Delray
Beach Police Department at an estimated annual cost of $67,710.25. Funding from account
codes, 001-2111-521-52.22, 001-2113-521-52.22, 001-2115-521-52.22, 001-2117-521-52.22,
001-2119-521-52.22, and 001-2121-521-52.22./_ / ~ ~ t',,.~.
Department Head Signature:~---~~,
Determination of Consistency wil~O/mprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds):
/
Funding available: Yes V/ No
Funding alternatives:
Account Number:
Account Description:
Account Balance:
(if applicable)
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: e~
Hold Until:
No
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action: Approved Disapproved
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DA V~,~ D~~.~MANAG ER
PAUL DORLING, DIR~EC~OR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
RECONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE SITE PLAN REVIEW AND
APPEARANCE BOARD'S APPROVAL OF A CLASS V SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOTEL
VISTA DEL MAR.
At its meeting of August 8, 2001 the Site Plan and Appearance Board approved the Class V site
development plan, waivers, landscape plan and architectural design elements associated with the
Hotel Vista Del Mar. The Board followed the established quasi-judicial procedures in considering the
project. City Staff and the applicant offered testimony, which supported the development proposal.
There was public testimony in opposition to the request. The objections mainly related to the size and
mass of the proposed structure. In addition, concerns with the zero setback at the northeast corner of
the site and its potential impacts on the redevelopment of the property to the north were noted. Future
redevelopment of the site (Boston's Restaurant) with a similar zero setback would potentially block the
ocean view for 1/2 of the hotel rooms. In light of that, significant opposition would be anticipated from
the new hotel owners. Further, with the elimination of only four rooms, a 12' setback could be
accommodated which would assure ocean view regardless of future development to the north. To
retain development equity, the owner to the north suggested entering into a private agreement to
provide a similar setback with future development.
The Board discussed these points at length. During discussions, it was acknowledge that the proposal
did meet the current regulations which allow a zero setback and the Board made positive findings with
respect to the site plan, landscape elevations and associated waivers.
On August 20, 2001, the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board's action was appealed by Michael
Weiner, attorney for Perry DonFrancisco owner of Boston's Restaurant (property immediately to the
north). "The proposed basis of the appeal is that the actions taken by the Site Plan Review and
Appearance Board was inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, LDRs and the Laws of the State of
Florida." The relief sought was that the approval of the Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Architectural
Elevations be reversed and denied.
The appeal was heard by the City Commission on September 4, 2001. The Commission upheld the
appeal and the project was denied.
At its September 18, 2001 meeting, the City Commission voted to reconsider the appeal. This
reconsideration is based upon the presentation of revisions to the site plan. The revised plans
address the major issue related to the appeal--the zero setback at the northeast corner of the site
and its potential impact on the redevelopment of the property to the north.
The major revision for the project is the elimination of 1 hotel room on each of the floors 2 through 5,
in the northeast corner of the building, thereby providing a 10' wide opening between the building and
City Commission Documentation
Meeting October 2, 2001
Reconsideration of Appeal of SPRAB Action - Hotel Vista Del Mar
Page 2
the north property line. This opening will allow air, light and ocean visibility for the north hotel rooms,
albeit reduced, if a similar building is erected on the property to the north. The angle of the rooms on
the north and south sides of the building has been changed so that the total number of hotel rooms
(70) could be maintained. Although the overall concept for the building design has not changed, there
are some changes proposed for the elevations. These include the following:
1. The addition of wood trellises over the top floor balconies on the east fa(;ade;
2. The addition of a faux storefront on the south side of the east fa(;:ade to screen the parking area;
3. The addition of canvas awnings on the 1st floor of the east fa(;;ade;
4. The addition of windows with shutters on the north and south facades for the front hotel rooms;
and,
5. The elimination of railings on the roof within breaks in the parapet wall.
Overall, the changes to the site plan are minor and there are no new LDR issues with the revised
plan. Since the vehicular access and parking layout remain the same, the waivers required in the
earlier plan are still necessary.
R
City Commission discretion.
Attachments:
· Rendering
· Reduced Plans
i
i
®
I
MICHAEL M. LISTICK
MARK L. KRALL
e-mail:
mlistick~bmindspring.com
mkrall~ni~dspring, com
LISTICK & KRALL, P.A.
616 E. Atlantic Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33483
(561) 276-7424
FAX (561) 278-6909
e-mail:
delraylawC~uno.eom
HAND DELIVERED
September 13, 2001
City Clerk
City of Delray Beach
100 N.W. 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Re: Item 9.A., Regular Agenda
City Commission Meeting of 9/4/2001
Appeal of SPRAB Decision/Hotel Vista Del Mar
Dear City Clerk:
Please allow this letter to serve as our formal request on behalf of the above referenced
applicant that you produce and deliver to us a certified copy of the City's record of all evidence and
testimony offered in connection with the City Commission appellate heating of the matter
referenced above.
Since we intend to file an appeal of the City Commission's decision on the above referenced
matter with the Palm Beach County Circuit Court, it is imperative that we obtain the City's record
as soon as possible since the deadline to file our appeal is Thursday, October 4, 2001.
Very truly yours,
MLK:ler
cc: Susan Ruby, Esq.
RECEIVED
q//,3 /o '
CiTY CLER~ ,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
TY MANAGER
AGENDA ITEM "7~) - REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001
~ONTRACr AWARD/HAVERLAND BLACKROCK CORP,/$PORT$
TURF ONE
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
This is before the City Commission to consider approval of a contract award in the amount of
$47,760.00 to Haverland Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One for the landscape maintenance of Atlantic
High School multi-purpose field. It is on the regular agenda because the recommendation is to award
to the second lou, bidder as the lowest responsive bidder.
The low bid came in at $42,000.00 from E.T. International Landscape and Janitorial, Inc. Mr. Elysee
Turene informed staff that he had no experience with the care of Bermuda grass, does not currently
have the proper equipment to maintain this type of turf (no reel mowers) and has no Workers
Compensation Insurance.
Funding is available from 001-4131-572-34.90 ( P&R Other Contractual Service) in the amount of
$47,760.00 (FY 2002 Budget).
Recommend approval of the contact award to Haverland Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One. in the
amount of $47,760.00.
RefiAgmemol4 Second Lowest B~d-Atlant~c Htgh F, eld 10.02.01
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
David Harden, City Manager
Jacklyn Rooney, Purchasing Supervisor(~
Joseph Sa~ance Director
September 26, 2001
SUBJECT:
DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING
OCTOBER 02, 2001 - BID AWARD - BID #2001-40
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE - ATLANTIC HIGH SCHOOL
MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS - ANNUAL CONTRACT
Item Before Commission:
City Commission is requested to approve the bid award to
Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One for landscape maintenance
Atlantic High School for an estimated annual cost of $47,760.
second low bidder, Haverland
of the multi-purpose fields at
Background:
Bids were received on September 05, 2001 from three (3) contractors all in accordance with City
purchasing policies and procedures. (Bid #2001-40. Documentation on file in the Purchasing
Office.) A tabulation of bids is attached for your review.
As stated on the attached memo dated September 18, 2001, the Director of Parks and Recreation
and the Parks Superintendent recommend award to second low bidder, Haverland Blackrock
Corp./Sports Turf One. Haverland Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One is our current vendor who
has been doing this contract with the City for the past three years and their work is very
satisfactory.
The low bidder, E.T. International Landscape and Janitorial Inc. has had no experience with the
care of Bermuda grass and does not have the proper equipment to perform the work outlined in
the specifications of this bid package.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends award to second low bidder, Haverland Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One for
the landscape maintenance of Atlantic High School Multi-Purpose Fields at an estimated annual
cost of $47,760. Funding from account code #001-4131-572-34.90.
Attachments:
Tabulation of Bids
Memo from Director of Parks and Recreation
CITY I]F [IELI:II:I¥ BEI:I[H
DELRAY BEACH
1993
100N.W. lstAVENUE DELRAYBEACH, FLORIDA 33444 5611243-7000
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Jackie Rooney
Purchasing Supervisor
FROM:
Joe Weldon
Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Bid #2001-40 - Atlantic High School Multi-Purpose Field
DATE:
September 18, 2001
I recommend Bid #2001-40 be awarded to the second lowest bidder,
Haverland Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One. Per the attached memorandum,
Tim Simmons, Parks Superintendent, spoke with the owner of the low
bidder, E.T. International Landscape and Janitorial, Inc., Mr. Elysee
Turene. Mr. Turene informed Mr. Simmons that he has no experience with
the care of Bermuda grass, does not currently have the proper equipment
to maintain this type of turf (no reel mowers) and has no Workers
Compensation Insurance.
Haverland Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One currently has the contract to
maintain Pompey Park and Atlantic High School for the past 2-3 years, and
we have been satisfied with their work. Please place this on the October
2, 2001 agenda for City Commission consideration. The amount is $47,760;
this will be funded out of account #001-4131-572-34.90.
Parks and Recreation
cc: David Harden, City Manager
Tim Simmons, Parks Superintendent
Attachment
Ref: j r200140
Prtnted on Recycled Paper
THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS
£1TY OF DELAKIY BER£H
DELRAY BEACH
AII-AmedcaCity
1993
100 N.W lstAVENUE DEI. RAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 561/243-7000
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joe Weldon
Director of Parks and Recreation
FROM: Tim Simmons
Parks Superintendent
SUBJECT: Bid #2001-40 - Atlantic High School Multi-Purpose Field
DATE: September 18, 2001
This memorandum is to advise you of my reasons for recommendin9 the
second lowest bidder for this contract.
After speaking with the owner of the low bidder, E.T. International
Landscape and Janitorial, Inc., Mr. Elysee Turene, he has informed me
that he has no experience with the care of Bermuda 9rass, he has only
been in business for 2 years, he currently does not have the proper
equipment to maintain this type of turf (no reel mowers). Mr. Turene
also currently has no Workers Compensation Insurance.
For these reasons, it is my recommendation to award Bid #2001-40 to the
second lowest bidder, Haverland Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One. This
company currently has the contract to maintain Pompey Park and Atlantic
High School for the past 2-3 years, and I have been satisfied with his
work.
Tim Simmons
Parks Maintenance Superintendent
TS:cp
Ref:ts200140
Recycled Paper
THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS
£1T¥ OF DELRrlV
PURCHASING DIVISION
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
Tim Simmons, Parks Superintendent
Jackie Rooney, Purchasing Supervisor~
Joseph Sa~:~ance Director
September 11, 2001
SUBJECT:
Bid #2001-40
Landscape Maintenance -Atlantic High School
Multi-Purpose Field
Attached is the "Tabulation of Bids" and a copy of the bids received on
September 05, 2001 for the above referenced subject.
Please review tab sheets and forward to Purchasing your award
recommendation.
Note: Low bidder, ET International Landscape & Janitorial Inc., did not submit a
equipment listing nor did they submit references. Two calls have been placed to
the vendor for this information (September 05, and September 11). The bid
package clearly states on Page 18, Section #11, "For this bid vendor must attach
to his bid an accurate, up-to-date listing of his current maintenance equipment,
including brands and model numbers. The City requires a listing of commercial
as well as residential accounts, including main contact person and phone
number. This information will be considered in the contract award review.
Failure to include all data noted above with the bid may eliminate your company
from the bidding process; prior submittals will not be accepted".
If you have any questions, you may contact me at ext. 7163.
Attachments
Cc: Joe Weldon, Director of Parks and Recreation
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
BID # 2001-40
ATLANTIC HIGH SCHOOL MULTI-PURPOSE FIELD
BID TABULATIONS - SEPTEMBER 5, 2001
ET International Haverland
Vendor Name Landscape & Blackrock Corp./ Tare Landscape
Janitorial, Inc. Sports Turf One
Total lump sum bid price for one (1) year for
landscape maintenance of the multi-purpose
field at Atlantic High School per the
specifications, terms and conditions of this bid.
Per Month $3,500.00 mo. $3,980.00 mo. $3,992.00 mo.
GRAND TOTAL YEARLY COST $42,000.00 yr. $47,760.00 yr. $47,904.00 yr.
Chemical Applications to be applied by: Michael S. Monroe Aarons Pest Control
Lawns by Deluxe
Florida Certified Pesticide Applications License? Yes Yes Yes
Deviations from Specifications (if applicable): None None None
List of current maintenance equipment attached? Yes Yes Yes
References Listed? No Yes Yes
Addendum No. 1 attached? Yes Yes Yes
s'/finance/purchasmg/B~d Tabulations/Landscape xlslsdll916101
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
Request to be placed on:
AGENDA REQUEST
Date:
September 18, 2001
X Regular Agenda
Special Agenda
__ Workshop Agenda
When: October 2, 2001
Description ofagendaitem: Request approval to award Bid #2001-40 to second lowest
bidder, Haverland Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One, for landscape maintenance of
Atlantic High School multi-purpose field. The amount is $47,760. This is to
be funded out of account #001-4131-572-34.90.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES
Draft Attached: YES
NO X
NO X
Recommendation: Award Bid #2001-40 to Haverland Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One.
Determination of Consistency wit~(~omprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds):
/
Funding available: Yes V/ No
Funding alternatives:
Account Number:
Account Description:
Account Balance:
(if applicable)
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda:~
Hold Until:
~ No
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action: Approved Disapproved
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
AGENDA REQUEST
Request to be placed on: October 02, 2001
Date: September 26, 2001
XX Consent Agenda __ Special Agenda __ Workshop Agenda
Description of agenda item:
Request for approval to award to second Iow bidder, Haverland Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One
for the landscape maintenance of the multi-purpose fields at Atlantic High School for an estimated
annual cost of $47,760.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES NO
Draft Attached: YES NO
Recommendation:
Approve award to second Iow bidder, Haverland Blackrock Corp./Sports Turf One, for the
landscape maintenance of the multi-purpose fields at Atlantic High School for an estimated annual
cost of $47,760. Funding from account code 001-4131-572-34.90.
Department Head Signature:
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds):
/
Funding available: Yes v/" No
Funding alternatives:
Account Number:
Account Description:
Account Balance:
(if applicable)
iqq, 030
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda:~
Hold Until:
No
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action: Approved Disapproved
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
David T. Harden, City Manager
~Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager
Agenda Item City Commission Meeting October 2, 2001
Special Event Request - Delray Beach Unity Walk
September 27, 2001
Action
City Commission is requested to endorse the Delray Beach Unity Walk scheduled to be
held on November 11, 2001 from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. sponsored by Community Chat,
to provide staff assistance for security and traffic control, barricading, trash removal and
clean up, signage and use of the Tennis Stadium. They are requesting waiver of all
overtime and all fees associated wit the use of the Tennis Stadium and Center.
Background
Attached is a request received from Cynthia Ridley on behalf of Community Chat for this
event. The letter outlines purpose of the event and assistance needed from the City. This
activity was suggested at the February 2001 Unity Dinner and would help to promote
Commissions goal of Community Unity. Participants would walk to the Tennis Stadium
from four (4) locations: the Milagro Center, Cason Methodist Church, Pompey Park and
the Village Academy.
Community Chat has commitments from Janet Reno and Representative Alcee Hastings
to speak at this event, although Representative Hastings has indicated that if Congress is
in session he would not be able to attend. Entertainment on the stage in the stadium is
also planned.
Community Chat would be responsible for promoting advertising, and managing this free
event, coordinating the walk routes worked out with the Police Department and would be
required to provide a sound system at the stadium. Estimated staff overtime for the event
is approximately $2,700. Rental fee, stage set-up fee and other fees for use of the
stadium are $5,500. The request is to waive all fees and overtime costs.
This is a new event that would meet the Commission goal of Community Unity. We
have had a cancellation of one (1) event in October at this time. No budget is available.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends consideration of approval of the event, staff assistance as requested,
use of the Tennis Stadium facility, signage and flag use and waiver of overtime costs and
fees.
RAB/tas
File:u:sweeney/agenda
Doc:Delray Beach Unity Walk 2001
COMMUNITY CHAT
141 S. W. 12th Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
(561) 276-6755
August 31,2001
Mr. Bob Barcinski
Assistant City Manager
City of Delray Beach
100 N.W. First Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Dear Mr. Barcinskl:
Thank you for your time and assistance in the Community Chat meeting two weeks ago.
I'm writing on behalf of Community Chat to request City endorsement of the Delray Beach Unity Walk scheduled
for November 11,2001. The event sponsor will be Community Chat. The purpose of the event is a follow-up
and a suggested act~mty requested by the participants of the Umty d~nner of February, 2001. At that droner,
community leaders, government officials, commumty residents and community clergy requested that this event be
planned and implemented.
The purpose of the event is to bnng together the various ethnic, socio-economic and religious groups in the
community to celebrate our diversity and unity. I have attached a description of the event, including walk route,
sites, speakers and the estimated members of participants.
We anticipate our overhead cost to be minimal. T-shirts, dnnks, food, etc. will be donated and we have
established a committee to develop sponsors to cover these items. As of this writing, Brahm Dub~n has
tentatively scheduled the Tennis Center for th~s event. Advertisement and promotional material would be
absorbed as an lnklnd contribution from community organizations.
As I discussed with you at the Community meeting, we are requesting the following:
Police assistance for security, traffic control and help planning the walk route
EMS assistance, if needed, as determined by the City of Delray Beach
Bamcade and trash removal by the City of Delray Beach
Four (4x4) event signs to advertise the event and be posted one week before the event
A wmver of fees for use of the Tennis Center
Waiver fee for city staff overtime
Transportation assistance to return participants to walk start sites
The country flags to be hung around the stadium
Use of City's walkie-talkies (6)
Page 2
Mr. Bob Barcinski
August 31, 2001
We need your assistance in determining the level of security for Janet Reno, our major speaker. We look forward
to working with the C~ty to make this a great event. If you need any additional information, please feel free to
contact Cynthia Ridley at (561) 243-7070.
Sincerely,
Cynthia Ridley
Chairperson
CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 ** PUBLIC HEARING **
ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-1
BACKGROUND
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 01-1 was transmitted to the Florida Department of
Community Affairs (DOA) for review following a public hearing held by the City
Commission on April 17, 2001. This meeting was also the first reading of the Adoption
Ordinance (No. 27-01). DCA staff reviewed the amendment and declined to issue an
Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report on August 23, 2001.
In summary, the amendment includes: one (1) Future Land Use Map amendment
(Fanelli Annexation); update of the Potential Residential Units Map & Table, appearing
in both the Future Land Use and Housing Element; general update of the Public
Facilities Element; and an update of the Comprehensive Plan Map Series (to reflect
current municipal boundaries).
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION
The Planning and Zoning Board considered Amendment 01-1 at a public hearing on
ORDINANCE NO. 27-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-1 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING
AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT", FLORIDA
STATUTES SECTIONS 163.3161 THROUGH 163.3243, INCLUSIVE;
ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"
ENTITLED "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-1" AND
INCORPOKATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING A
SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach exercised the authority granted pursuant to the
provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161 through 163.3243, inclusive, known as the
"Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and
WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 82-89, the City Commission adopted the document
entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, did prepare an
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-1; and,
WHEREAS, Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-1 was found to be in compliance by
the Florida Department of Community Affairs and no ORC (Objections, Recommendations &
Comments) Report was issued; and
WHEREAS, following due public notice, the second of two required public hearings on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-1 was held on September 4, 2001, in accordance with
statutory requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, hereby declares
its intent to exercise the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections
163.3161 through 163.3243, inclusive, known as the "Local Government Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act".
Section 2. That in implementation of its declared intent as set forth in Section 1 of this
ordinance, there is hereby adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-
1 ", which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3. That the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida" is
hereby amended pursuant to the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-1".
Section 4. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof,
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the
day of ,2001.
ATTEST
MAYOR
City Clerk
First Reading ~/7, ,~0~/
!
Second Reading
Paae
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-t
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
Potential Residential Units Map
Potential Residential Units Table
2
2
2
AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP
Fanelli Annexation FLUM Amendment from County
units/acre) to General Commercial for +/- 2.65 acres
HOUSING ELEMENT
Potential Residential Units Map
Potential Residential Units Table
HR-8 (8
3
23
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT
General update of entire element
INTRODUCTION, FUTURE LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION,
AND PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENTS
Update of map series within various elements (municipal boundary
changes)
SUPPORT DOCUMENTS
Appendix
1
2
3
4
6
7
"Potential Residential Units" Map
Revised "Potential Residential Units" Map
"Potential Residential Units" Table
Revised "Potential Residential Units" Table
Existing Map Series
Proposed Map Series
FLUM Amendments:
5 Fanelli FLUM amendment staff report
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
COMPREHENSIVE' PLAN AMENDMENT
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
1) Location: Pg. FL-10, Potential Residential Units Map (Map #3)
See existing map attached as Support Document #1.
Change: REVISION
See proposed map attached as Support Document #2
Comment: This map is being updated by eliminating parcels that have been
developed, and to reflect the current City Limits. (Note: this also appears as Map #3 in
the Housing Element)
2) Location: Pg. FL-11, Potential Residential Units Table
See existing table attached as Support Document #3.
Change: REVISION
See revised table attached as Support Document #4.
Comment: This table is being updated to reflect changes in the unit counts for parcels
which have recently received development approvals, and to eliminate parcels which
have been developed. The map has also been revised to show the current City limits.
(Note: this also appears as Table HO-20 in the Housing Element)
AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP
Fanelli Annexation
· Privately initiated Future Land Use Map amendment involving the 2.65 acre site, to
the east of the Boy's Market, from the County Land Use Map designation of HR-8
(High Density, 8 units/acre) to City Land Use Map designation of GC (General
Commercial).
See Support Documents #5 (Fanelli Annexation & Future Land Use Map Amendment
staff report)
HOUSING ELEMENT
3) Location: Pg. HO-16, Potential Residential Units Map (Map #3)
See existing map attached as Support Document #1.
Change: REVISION
See proposed map attached as Support Document #2
Comment: This map is being updated by eliminating parcels that have been
developed, and to reflect the current City Limits. (Note: this also appears as Map #3 in
the Future Land Use Element)
4) Location: Pg. HO-17, Potential Residential Units Table
See existing table attached as Support Document #3.
Change: REVISION
See revised table attached as Support Document ~4
Comment: This table is being updated to reflect changes in the unit counts for parcels
which have recently received development approvals, and to eliminate parcels which
have been developed. The map has also been revised to show the current City limits.
(Note: this also appears as Table L-5 in the Future Land Use Element)
(2)
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT
5) The following is a comprehensive update of the Public Facilities to reflect
current data and information. The element is only shown in the strike through
and underline format.
BACKGROUND
The text of the Element is a summary
recommendations which are contained in th~
C) Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage
Acquifer Recharge El~ement (Post, Buckl~
O Water Treatment Plant Master Plan (Haz
O Wastewater Transmission System MastE
O lgg6 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (£
C) Alternative Water Treatment Study (CH2
of the complete inventory, analysis, and
following source documents:
Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater
y, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., 1989)
.~n & Sawyer, 1991)
Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plat (Camp, Dresser, McKee, 1989)
Water Distribution System Master Plan (I lazen & Sawyer, 1992)
Water Supply Master Plan (CH2M Hill, 1!~91)
· ... ' .... !~A ~ (Kimley Horn, 2000)
Stormwater Master Plan (Mcck, Rccs ~-, .......... ,
The source documents, and other docum~
available for public review at the Planning
N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida.
Plan (Hazen & Sawyer, 1992)
¥ of Delray Beach, 1996)
Hill 2001)
nts which are cited in the Element, are
Id Zoning Department offices located at 100
( )
INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
The following summaries have been prepared to facilitate review with the requirements
of Administrative Rule 9J-5. As a summary, only significant items are highlighted. The
source documents should be referred to for more information.
A separate inventory and analysis is provided for sewer, water, drainage, and solid
waste disposal facilities. Inventory and analysis dealing with groundwater aquifer
recharge is addressed under the water subsection.
SEWER FACILITIES
Wastewater treatment is provided by the South Central Wastewater Treatment Facility,
located in Delray Beach. The facility is jointly owned by Delray Beach and Boynton
Beach, under the responsibility of a board comprised of the City Commissions of both
cities. Daily operations of the facility are overseen by an executive director, reporting to
the board. Delray Beach Environmental Services Department is responsible for the
wastewater collection and transmission system within the service area.
The service area coincides with the City's Planning Area plus service provided through
contract to Highland Beach. Also included are several single and multi-family
connections in the Town of Gulf Stream. The service area encompasses approximately
18 square miles, as shown on Map #1.
The wastewater collection system consists of approximately 300 319 miles of gravity
and force mains interconnected to !!3 117 lift stations and 3 2 master lift stations. In
addition, there are more than 500 415 septic tanks within the service area. The
treatment plant was constructed in 1979, with a programmed life of 50 years (2029).
Ultimate disposal is by ocean discharge of secondary effluent and land spreading of
sludge. The design capacity of the treatment plant, established by its secondary
treatment capacity, is 24 mgd. This capacity is shared equally between Boynton Beach
.and Delray Beach.
CAPACITY ANALYSIS (SEWER)
CAPACITY DEMAND ('96) DEMAND (BUILD OUT)
00
12 m~ld 8=66 8.00 mgd 9.05 mgd
Deficiencies
Upgrading and maintenance of lift stations requires on-going capital investment.
(4)
Exeessive Infiltration into the collection system could impact future facility costs through
capital expansion. An on-going program to reduce infiltration/inflow is a cost effective
method of reducing the need for treatment facility expansion and requires on-going
capital investment.
POTABLE WATER AND GROUNDWATER RECHARGE FACILITIES
Water treatment is provided by the City of Delray Beach at the Water Treatment Plant.
The geographic service area coincides with the Planning Area plus service provided to
Gulf Stream through contract as a bulk customer. The service area encompasses
approximately 18 square miles, as shown on Map #1.
The treatment plant was constructed in 1972, with a programmed life of 50 years
(2022). The design capacity is established by its clarifier capacity (28 mgd). The City
maintains a State certified laboratory, the primary responsibility of which is monitoring
potable water quality.
CAPACITY ANALYSIS (WATER TREATMENT)
CAPACITY DEMAND (-q)6) 00 DEMAND (BUILD OUT)
28 mgd ~,3.2 16.4 mgd ~ 18.3 mgd
(-1-6~ 20.5 m~d peak/ (2--1~ 22.8 m~ld peak/
The water distribution system includes 426 miles of water mains ranging from 2 to 24
inch diameter, 2540 fire hydrants, transfer pumps, and storage facilities with a capacity
of 8.5 m,q and an aquifer stora.qe and recovery facility with a usable capacity in excess
of 100 mR.
The water supply is provided from 27- 30 wells in four wellfields, with programmed
expansion to 38 wells total, yielding a total design capacity of ~ 49.74 mgd. The
amount of withdrawal is established, through the South Florida Water Management
District consumptive use permit, at ~ 21.08 mgd. There are an additional 5 wells in
the eastern wellfield which are not in production due to salt water intrusion (2) and slight
increases in chlorides (3), which can be used for emergency standby. In addition, there
are more than 1,000 domestic wells within the service area. There are no major
groundwater recharge areas within the Planning Area, although the entire region east of
the Conservation Area is identified as a prime aquifer recharge area by the U.S.
Geological Survey and the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan.
Deficiencies
Water mains of 2" diameter, found in older areas of the City, are not sufficient for fire
protection. Funds are provided annually to upgrade these lines.
(5)
Alternative Water Treatment will be required to meet the Environmental Protection
A.qency Sta.qe 2 Standards for disinfection by-products. A study is currently underway
to determine the most feasible alternative treatment method which will meet these
requirements. Upon completion of the study fundin.q will be allocated to implement the
required treatment modification.
Needed improvements to the piping system have been identified to accommodate
demand conditions and localized fire demands.
CAPACITY ANALYSIS (WELLS)
CAPACITY DEMAND ('96) DEMAND (BUILD OUT)
49.2 mgd 12.09 mgd 15.6 mgd
/17.96 m~ld peak/ 123.4 m~d peak/
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
The Solid Waste Authority has responsibility for the ultimate disposal of solid waste in
the region. The City is responsible for collection of solid waste within the City limits
through a contract with a private firm.
Solid waste is collected by the City's contractor and generally taken to a transfer station
located within the City, then by Solid Waste Authority trucks to the regional landfill,
located near West Palm Beach. The transfer station, located on S.W. 4th Avenue just
south of Linton Boulevard, has a capacity of 1,000 tons per day and is operating at its
maximum capacity. This transfer station serves the south county from Boynton Beach
Boulevard south to the County line. Other transfer stations used are outside the City.
The North County Regional Solid Waste Disposal Facility, operated by the Solid Waste
Authority, is the ultimate disposal site. This facility occupies 334 acres, and consists of
a Class 1 (garbage and incinerator residue) and a Class 3 (trash) landfill. The landfill, at
its established Level of Service standard of 7.13 pounds per person per day, has
sufficient capacity to serve until the year 2020. In addition to the landfill, the facility
provides recycling, waste-to-energy incineration and composting facilities. The total
tonnage added to the landfill annually is 1,239,293 tons (1995). The City of Delray
Beach contributes 56,500 tons per year (commercial and residential) to the landfill
(1995), including garbage, trash, and vegetation. This equates to 6.17 pounds per
person per day. The City's yearly contribution to the landfill is 4.6% of the total. The
Delray Beach population of 50,195 (1995 estimate) represents 5.2% of the County
population of 960,600 (1995 estimate). The City's impact on the landfill is, therefore,
(6)
15% less than the Level of Service standard and 13% less than its portion of the
County population.
The City has an aggressive recycling program that began in 1990. The program
includes curbside residential recycling for single family and multi-family homes. The
program accounts for a reduction to the waste stream of 12,854 tons per year (1995).
This represents a reduction of over 30% in the residential waste stream.
There were no problems or deficiencies with the collection system. Long truck queues
at the transfer station sometimes cause congestion problems.
The capacity of the landfill was not estimated for this report. Such capacity analysis is
under the jurisdiction of the Solid Waste Authority, and indicates sufficient capacity
through the year 2020. A local issue relative to capacity would be whether the local
government is meeting the established level of service standard of 7.13 pounds per
person per day. As discussed above, Delray Beach is well below the standard, at 6.17
pounds per person per day.
DRAINAGE
Responsibility for storm drainage in the City is divided among a hierarchy of state and
regional agencies, the City, and landowners, as follows:
AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY
South Florida Water Management District
Lake Worth Drainage District
City of Delray Beach/Palm Beach County
Land Owners
Major canals and structures; permitting
Lateral and equalizer canals and minor structures
Public storm sewer system
On-site storm sewers and retention areas
Deficiencies
Local and City-wide drainage deficiencies are identified in the Stormwater Master Plan
~,.,......,~""~' Roos &.A°"",'i"*""...~....,......., ~o~. ~ .~ (Kimle¥-Horn 2000). The City has programmed
projects to correct the deficiencies identified in this report and achieve a Level of
Service standard of 'C', with funding to come from the Stormwater Utility Fee.
(7)
map
(a)
STREET SYSTEM
The City has repair and maintenance responsibility for most roads within the City limits.
Exceptions to this include major roads under the jurisdiction of the State or County, and
private roads maintained by land owners. The City maintains approximately 49-1- 199.6
miles of roadways (September 2000).
The City h=d has undertaken a program (2000 Road Bond Pro,qram) to reconstruct
numerous streets under City jurisdiction. An annual program exists to resurface streets
as needed. In addition, there is a need to pave currently unpaved streets, particularly in
areas added to the City by annexation. Currently, approximately 2 2.4 miles of unpaved
roads exist in the City.
BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITIES
An inventory of the major buildings and facilities owned by the City includes:
El City Hall and Community Center on NW 1st Avenue.
[3 City Attorney's Office on NW 1st Avenue.
[3 Water/sewer warehouse on Lake Ida Road.
[] Central Fire Station on Atlantic Avenue.
[] Four fire substations (#2, #3, #,4, #5).
[3 Environmental Services complex on SW 4th Street.
[] Water treatment plant on SW 2nd Avenue.
[] Chemical/Generator Stora,qe Buildin,q on SW 2nd Avenue
[] Public Safety Building (Police) on Atlantic Avenue.
[3 City Marina.
El Municipal Tennis Center and Stadium (operated by management firm).
[] Municipal Golf Course (operated by a management firm ).
[3 Lakeview Golf Course (operated by a management firm).
[3 Library Site (leased to non-profit organization which owns and operates building).
[] Old School Square Complex (operated by a non-profit organization).
(9)
Cason Cottage Museum (operated by a non-profit organization).
Cemetery (mausoleum portion is operated by a lessee).
Parks and Historic Structures (addressed in the Open Space & Recreation Element).
Deficiencies
There are no major deficiencies related to buildings and facilities.
NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summarizing from the previous facility and performance analysis, the following needs
and recommendations are identified in the City's Public Facilities Element.
O Continue the program for reduction of I/I in the wastewater collection system.
rq Continue the program for extending water and sewer mains to inhabited areas in the
City.
gl Implement alternative water treatment to meet Sta.qe 2 EPA Requirements.
D Develop a street system master plan.
(10)
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
GOAL AREA "A"
Objective A-1
Policy A-1.1
Policy A-1.2
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Sources of Pollution
Septic Systems
Rehabilitation of Sewer System
Objective A-2
Solid Waste
Policy A-2.1
Policy A-2.2
Policy A-2.3
Local Drop Off for Hazardous Waste
Solid Waste Recycling
Waste Level of Service
GOAL AREA "B" POTABLE WATER
Objective B-1 Water Supply
Policy B-1.1 WWTP Effluent Recycling
Policy B-1.2 Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR)
Objective B-2 Meeting Future Demands
Policy B-2.1 Decrease in Consumption
Policy B-2.2 Level of Service
Policy B-3.3 New Development Concurrency
Objective B-3 Groundwater Protection
Policy B-3.1 Wellfield Protection
Policy B-3.2 Minimal Reliance on Eastern Wellfield
Objective B-4 Enhancement of Water Quality (Potable)
Policy B-4.1 Reports to the City Commission
Policy B-4.2 Water Main Inspection
Policy B-4.3 Discourage Urban Sprawl
(11)
GOAL AREA "C" SEWER COLLECTION AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
Objective C-1 Master Plans
Policy C-1.1 Water System Model
Policy C-1.2 Sewer s_System Model
Objective C-2 System Improvements
Policy C-2.1 Remedial Work - Sewer [Revised byArnendment 00-2]
Policy C-2.2 Remedial Work - Water [Revised by Arnendrnent 00-2]
Objective C-3 Availability of Facilities - Sewer
Policy C-3.1 Obligations of New Development
Policy C-3.2 Upgrading existing Facilities
Objective C-4 Availability of Facilities - Water
Policy C-4.1 Upgrading of Existing Facilities
Policy C-4.2 Obligations of New Development
Objective C-5 Revenue Allocations
Policy C-5.1 General Fund Relationship
Policy C-5.2 Annual Allocations for Upgrading of System Components
Policy C-5.3 Financing of System expansions
Policy C-5.4 Coordination with Other Improvement Projects
Objective C-6 Wastewater Treatment Plant
Policy C-6.1
Policy C-6.2
Policy C-6.3
Policy C-6.4
Level of Service
Participation Formula
Sludge Disposal
Design Capacity
GOAL AREA "D" BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES
Objective D-1
Public Facilities
Policy D-1.1 Repair and Maintenance
Policy D-1.2 Facility Replacement
Policy D-1.3 Accessibility
(12)
GOAL AREA 'E" STREETS AND DRAINAGE
Objective E-1
Drainage Facilities
Policy E-1.1
Policy E-1.2
Policy E-1.3
Policy E-1.4
Policy E-1.5
Project Priorities
Design Standards
Storm Water Management Regulations
Design Frequency Standards
NPDES Programs and Activities
Objective E-2
Funding Mechanisms
Policy E-2.1 Stormwater Utility Fee
Policy E-2.2 Bonding
Objective E-3
Street Resurfacing and Reconstruction
Policy E-3.1
Policy E-3.2
Policy E-3.3
Street Resurfacing Program
Street System Master Plan
Sidewalk System
GOAL AREA "F" PUBLIC INFORMATION
Objective F-1
Public Information Resources
Objective F-2
Public Participation
Policy F-2.1
Policy F-2.2
Policy F-2.3
Public Hearings Required Prior to Setting Priorities
Local Planning Agency Responsibilities
Priority Changes restricted
(13)
GOAL AREA "A"
THE PURPOSES, PROGRAMMING, AND PROVISION OF
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES SHALL BE DIRECTED BY THE
IDEAL OF PROVIDING A SAFE AND DECENT PHYSICAL
ENVIRONMENT.
Objective A-t
Specific programs to mitigate the adverse impacts of point sources of pollution, as
identified in the following policies, shall be developed and implemented by the City's
Environmental Services Department and the South Central Regional Wastewater
Treatment Facility Board, as appropriate.
Policy A-I.1 Existing septic tanks which are located in sewered areas throughout the
City shall be removed from use as necessary pursuant to Florida Statutes. Septic
systems deemed subject to flooding, or with chronic drainfield problems that may have
an adverse impact on the environment shall be abandoned and connection made to the
central sewer system.
Policy A-1.2 Programming of improvements to the sewer system shall place a high
priority upon the rehabilitation of portions of the original system which experience
infiltration and leakage.
Objective A-2
Programs to address the collection and disposal of solid waste, as identified in the
following policies, shall be developed and implemented.
Policy A-2.1 The City shall support the continued operation of the "transfer" station or
suitable alternative for the collection of small amounts of hazardous substances from
individuals, and public information efforts which educate the public on the identification
and proper disposal of household hazardous waste.
Policy A-2.2 Expand the solid waste recycling program, including a focus on
commercial recycling and public awareness, with the goal of reducing the 1990 waste
stream level of 87,000 tons by 50% in 2000.
Policy A-2.3 A level of service for solid waste at a generation of 7.13 pounds per
person per day is hereby established within the City of Delray Beach.
(14)
GOAL AREA "B"
POTABLE WA TER SHALL BE PLANNED FOR AND PROVIDED
SO THAT IT IS AVAILABLE TO ACCOMMODATE DEMANDS
BOTH IN TERMS OF QUANTITY AND QUALITY WHILE ALSO
MAKING WISE USE OF THIS LIMITED RESOURCE AND THE
LIMITED RESOURCE OF CAPITAL.
Objective B-1
Even though the City has projected an adequate water supply, it shall provide for
increasing draw-down and the potential of reduced capacity through salt water intrusion
and/or extended drought conditions through optimum use of existing wells, development
of new wells and development of alternative technologies and methods of providing
water. This objective shall be met in the performance of the following:
Policy B-1.1 The City, through the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment
Facility Board, shall continue to monitor the area of effluent reuse with the ultimate goal
of reclaiming and reusing more effluent from the wastewater treatment plant if and when
such a program becomes technically and economically feasible. Priorities for expansion
should be on golf courses in the City, and in the Coastal Planning Area.
Policy B-1.2 The City shall continue to ~ utilize the Acquifer Storage and
Recovery (ASR) well pre, ram to supplement water supply during conditions of drought
or well field contamination and as a method of balancing the demand on water supply
wells during periods of high and Iow demand.
Objective B-2
To insure that potable water is available to meet consumption, a reduction in demand
through conservation and treatment plant enhancement shall be achieved as addressed
in the following:
policy B-2.'I The City shall maintain its program of responsible consumption of water
and shall decrease the overall per capita consumption of water by 10% from the 1989
level of 196 gpcd through continued implementation of the following techniques and
programs: (Also see Objective A-4 of the Conservation Element).
Maintaining its water rate structure which establishes an inverted block rate structure
to set higher consumption rates for increased water use in order to promote
reductions in water consumption as well as establishment of conservation
surcharges, based on South Florida Water Management District formulae, and
keyed to various levels of drought alert.
Mandatory use of wells for irrigation purposes where conditions permit.
Continued enforcement of water use laws.
(15)
[3 The consideration of xeriscape landscaping alternatives for all new development
during the review of site and development plans.
[3 Continuation of the regular preventive maintenance program for water mains, pumps
and meters.
[3 Continuation of the wastewater effluent reuse program.
Policy B-2.2 The City's water utility shall perform at the following levels of service:
[3 Average design flow of the water system @ 195 gpcd.
13 Storage capacity for the water system @ 15% of maximum flow plus fire reserve at
1.5 mg, plus 25% of that total. (Based on -1-996 2000 figures, this amount is 6 mg).
[3 Minimum pressure for the water system @ 20 psi.
(Note: The above standards are currently met throughout the system).
Policy B-2.3 It shall be an obligation of new development to provide water system
improvements to accommodate demands created by it and to meet the City's minimum
design standards concurrent with development.
Objective B-3
The City shall provide for the protection of its potable water resources through
implementation of the following policies:
Policy B-3.1 Protection of existing wellfields shall be accommodated through the
continued implementation of monitoring for salt water intrusion, wastewater
pretreatment programs and monitoring wells and through enhanced quality control
programs which provide early detection of possible contamination.
Policy B-3.2 The City shall maintain provisions in the program for raw water supply to
require only minimal reliance upon wells which are subject to salt water intrusion.
Objective B-4
The City shall provide for the enhancement of the quality of its water through
implementation of the following:
Policy B-4.1 Annual consumer confidence reports which ......_.~,+ ...... .,....,,.,'~*" ..,,...,.-"-'-" w..~"- ,,,.~...~'--'-'~ *"'...
t~.e,, r-~,,.v.., r.,.,.,....;....~.....,.,,,,.....,~,, ..... ..,.,..,,~'~"~' describe the current condition of potable water, including at
a minimum, water quality, c,-,d consumption trends, and treatment methods, shall be
distributed to residents.
(16)
Policy B-4.2 Whenever the opportunity occurs to uncover or examine an existing water
main, an inspection shall be conducted relative to the presence of asbestos cement in
the main. The results of each such inspection shall be logged and made a part of the
repc,"t to the Ccmmlss!en Operation and Maintenance Plan.
Policy B-4.3 The City shall assist in discouraging urban sprawl within areas of County
jurisdiction by denying requests to make water service available outside its existing
Planning Area to areas which could be developed at Iow density with City water
facilities.
Policy B-4.4 The City shall implement alternative treatment methods based on the
results of thealternative treatment study in an effort to meet the EPA staqe 2 disinfection
by-productrule requirements.
GOAL AREA"C"
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEMS AND WATER DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO UNSERVED AREAS, AND
EXISTING SYSTEMS SHALL BE UPGRADED IN SUCH A
MANNER AS TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE
ENVIRONMENT THROUGH AN ACCELERATED
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
Objective C-1
The condition and inventory of the water and sewer maste~ systems shall be kept
current through regular updates of the..~..~*" ~.,~'"~,...,'--~'i~'*;~'"~'.~,~.~.,.~,,.~ Ciht atlas and surveillance
Dro_~rams.
Policy C-1.1 The water distribution system ..........,,,~......,* .... ,,,......,a-' atlas shall be maintained
on an on-going basis and shall reflect current system inventory. =nd Operational
characteristics will be maintained utilizinq the Hansen Data Base Program and shall be
.used in the planning of system extensions and upgrade requirements. ,Mede! cc!!br3t!cr,
Policy C-1.2 The wastewater collection and transmission system...., , , . .. ... ,* .... ,,,...,..,'~--' atlas
shall be maintained on an on-going basis and shall reflect current system inventory.
...nd Operational characteristics will be monitored by radio telemetry and surveillance
Dro~rams, and shall be used in the planning of system extensions ami upgrade
re,.,ulremen~s,~, - ~,.,.~,., ,.,.,;~,...,..,.,. oh..,u ~,,~ ~,~;,,o~,.,~ ...... ,,,, ,,., .,,,~,~,.~ ....... ~ .....
(17)
Objective C-2
Upgrading of sewer and water facilities shall occur on an accelerated schedule.
upgrades shall be funded through annual appropriations in the Water and
Renewal and Replacement Fund.
System
Sewer
Policy C-2.1 ^ study has been completed determining the total program cost of
addressing remedial work needed, for wastewater lines and lift stations, to correct the
problems with inflow and infiltration. The City shall allocate annual expenditures to
complete the project over a 15 year time frame. [Revised by Amendment 00-2]
Policy C-2.2 A study has been completed determining the total program cost of
addressing remedial work needed to correct deficiencies in existing water lines. The
City shall allocate annual expenditures to complete the project over a 15 year time
frame. [Revised by Amendment 00-2]
Objective C-3
Wastewater collection system capacity is available to all areas within the City's service
area. Installation of facilities shall be programmed when the need is demonstrated.
Policy C-3.1 New development shall be responsible for extending sewer service to and
through the land to be developed. Said extensions shall meet the City's performance
standards.
Policy C-3.2 Upgrading of existing wastewater facilities shall be provided for through
annual appropriations in the capital improvement program.
Objective C-4
Potable water distribution system capacity is available to all areas within the City's
service area. Installation of facilities shall be programmed when the need is
demonstrated.
Policy C-4.1 Upgrading of existing potable water facilities shall be provided for through
annual appropriations in the capital improvement program.
Policy C-4.2 New development shall be responsible for extending water service to and
through the land to be developed. Said extensions shall meet the City's performance
standards.
(18)
Objective C-5
Capital raised through the water and sewer enterprise funds shall be allocated as
required by bond covenants. Allocations shall include those in the following policies.
Policy C-5.1 Transfers from enterprise funds to the general fund are made only for the
fund's proportionate share of administrative costs and an in-lieu of tax payment.
Policy C-$.2 Annual allocations shall be provided for upgrading system components
(i.e. manholes, hydrants, etc.) in the Water and Sewer Renewal and Replacement
Fund.
Policy C-5.3 Upgrading of existing systems to construction and level of service
standards and extension of new facilities to unserviced, inhabited areas shall be
financed through appropriations in the Water and Sewer New Capital Outlay Fund.
Policy C-$.4 Priorities for projects shall also consider other improvement projects (e.g.
street construction and drainage) in establishing priorities.
Objective c-6
The City Commission in its role with the Board of the South Central Regional Waste
Water Treatment Plant shall examine ways in which increased costs associated with
capital expansion can be avoided with respect to property owners within the City.
Policy C-6.1 The Level of Service of the waste water treatment plant is hereby
established as 12 mgd, or 160 gpcd in addition to the specific requirements of Boynton
Beach (capacity divided by effective buildout population of 75,000).
Policy C-6.2 The City Commission shall, prior to commitments by the South Central
Regional Waste Water Treatment Board for capital expansion at the wastewater
treatment plant, renegotiate the participation formula for such expansion based on
'relative populations and usage at the time of the expansion.
Policy C-6.3 Through its membership on the South Central Regional Wastewater
Treatment Facility Board, the City shall assure that alternatives to land application of
treated wastewater sludge are assessed, at least every two years, and shall continue to
monitor the impacts of the effluent from the ocean outfall.
Policy C-6.4 Average and peak flow design capacity for the Regional Wastewater
Treatment Plant shall be 21 mgd and 30 mgd respectively. Thus, capacity need shall
be monitored by the South Central Wastewater Regional Treatment Plant Board.
(19)
GOAL AREA "D"
A COORDINATED AND COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM FOR
THE PROVISION OF ADEQUATE OFFICE FACILITIES FOR THE
CONDUCT OF CITY BUSINESS SHALL BE CONTINUED.
Objective D-1
Provisions are to be implemented to maintain and upgrade existing public facilities to
retain the acceptable level of service for the facility and to maintain the "marketability" of
the facility and the City. This objective shall be met through the following policies.
Policy D-1.1 The City shall continue its established program for the maintenance and
repair of buildings and facilities, including such items as roof replacement and major
structural repair, in a timely manner to maintain the viability of the facility.
Policy D-1.2 The City shall continue its established program for the replacement of
irreparable or obsolete buildings, facilities, and major facility elements and the
upgrading of existing facilities to maintain their ability to deliver the established level of
service to the community.
Policy D-t.3 All new construction projects shall be in accordance with Federal
guidelines on accessibility. The City shall make modifications to existing facilities that
are easily achievable without great expense, such that the facility will be in accordance
with Federal guidelines on accessibility.
GOAL AREA "E"
PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INCONVENIENCE TO THE PUBLIC
CREATED BY FLOODING AND POOR STREET CONDITIONS
SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCED AND, WHERE
POSSIBLE, ELIMINA TED THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
Objective E-1
A capital improvement program
management has been adopted
identified in that program, shall
Stormwater Utility Fee.
directed specifically to storm drainage and runoff
by the City Commission, and capital projects, as
be implemented with funding to come from the
Policy E-1.1 Criteria for determining project priorities shall be as defined in the
Stormwater Master Plan, and based upon correcting current, localized problems.
Policy E-1.2 Minimum design standards for determining the scope of drainage projects
shall be such as to establish a level of service at least equal to the standard of retaining
the first one inch of runoff, or 2.5 inches of water storage times the percentage of
impervious area, whichever is greater, to protect water quality.
(20)
Policy E-1.3 Storm water drainage regulations which provide for the protection of
natural drainage features and ensure that development utilizes storm water
management systems which are compatible with this objective shall be retained.
Policy E-1.4 The City shall maintain through regulations the minimum design storm
return frequency for stormwater facilities capacity.
Policy E-1.5 The City shall protect and enhance surface water quality through the full
implementation of programs and activities included in the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
Policy E-'I.6 The City shall develop and implement a stormwater mapping system and
maintenance program for storm sewers and structures.
Objective E-2
Drainage improvements and flood control measures shall be financed through the
Stormwater Utility Fee. Funded projects shall be located throughout the City as
opposed to being concentrated in a single quadrant. The fee shall be reassessed upon
completion of the program.
Objective E-3
The street system under the City's jurisdiction shall be maintained and enhanced to
provide a uniform level of service throughout the City and provide a safe and convenient
transportation network.
Policy E-3.1 The program of resurfacing streets shall be maintained with at least the
current funding level.
Policy E-3.2 The City shall develop a street system master plan to enable the
development of criteria to prioritize annual work programs and allow optimum funding
decisions. The master plan will be completed by FY 98/99, 01/02 and will address all
components of the street system, including roadway surface, signs and markings, on-
street parking, storm sewers and swales, ~, and street lights. A sidewalk
survey was completed in 1999 and will be used to establish sidewalk work programs.
Policy E-3.3 The City shall program installation of sidewalks on an annual basis, with
the goal of completing a safe and convenient sidewalk system throughout the City by
the year 2000 2005.
(21)
GOAL AREA "F"
THE NEED FOR ENHANCEMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND
THE PROCESSES USED TO IDENTIFY, PRIORITIZE, AND
FINANCE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PUT FORWARD IN A
MANNER WHICH IS EASILY UNDERSTOOD BY THE PUBLIC
AND IS CONSISTENTLY AND EQUITABL¥ APPLIED.
Objective F-1
Public knowledge and understanding of public facilities and infrastructure planning shall
be assured through continuation of the following practices: display of system maps for
water, sewer and drainage in City Hall; ready availability of the Five Year Capital
Improvement Plan; prominent display of pamphlets addressing water conservation, solid
waste disposal, and other subjects relative to public facilities.
Objective F-2
Public awareness of the methods used to determine public improvement activities, and
public input to the process, shall be encouraged through the continued implementation
of the following:
Policy F-2.1 Public input through testimony received at public hearings, advertised and
held before the Local Planning Agency, shall be solicited annually during winter months
in order to identify geographic areas which are most in need of improvements.
Policy F-2.2 Criteria, as identified in the Capital Improvement Element, shall be
followed in the establishment of priorities for construction of public facilities. On an
annual basis, the Local Planning Agency shall forward to the City Commission a listing
of new or revised priorities with written findings as to the relationship of projects to those
criteria.
Policy F-2.3 Once established, program priorities shall not be altered except as
allowed in the policies established for implementation of capital improvement
programming.
(22)
INTRODUCTION, FUTURE LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION
ELEMENTS
6) Location: Map # 1 IN-4
Map # 1 FL-2
Map # 3 FL-t0
Map # 4 FL-46
Map # 6 FL-49
Map # 7 FL-50
Map # 8 FL-51
Map # 9 FL-52
Map #10 FL-53
Map #11 FL-54
Map # 3 HO-16
Map #12 TR-13
Map #13 TR-22
Map #14 TR-24
Map #15 TR-25
Map #16 TR-26
Map #17 TR-30
Map #18 TR-31
Map #19 TR-32
Map #20 TR-34
Map #21 TR-35
Map # 1 PF-4
(See Support Document #6 for existing map series)
'Change: REVISION
(See Support Documents #7 for proposed map series)
Comment: Modifications to maps are to delineate the new city boundaries reflecting
recent annexations.
S:~adv~comp\01-1cornpplan
(23)
SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 1
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-1
POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS MAP
SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-1
REVISED POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS MAP
SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 1
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-1
POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS MAP
CANAL
LAKE IDA ROAD
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
STREAM
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
I
ATLANTIC
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LINTON BOULEVARD
NW
S.W
BOULEVARD
L-58 CANAL C-15 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEACH
POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS
MAP #3
Mil;'
I
AGGREGATE PARCELS OF LAND, WHICH ARE VACANT OR UNDERDEVELOPED, 5 ACRES
I i OR GREATER IN SIZE, AND HAVE A F.L.U.M. DESIGNATION OF LOW DENSITY, MEDIUM DENSITY,
ORAF'HIC SCALE TRANSITIONAL, MIXED USE, OR RURAL RESIDENTIAL.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA LEGEND:
Q PLANNING AREA CITY UMITS ...................
PLANNING &: ZONING DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER (ULTIMATE crP( BOUNDARY)
MARCH 2000
SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-1
REVISED POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS MAP
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
L-50 CANAL
~!~~ [ ........................... ~.~..___._
~ A~NuE
. ....~~ ¢' tt
. LO.ON BOULEVARD m
' r J LINTON BOULEVARD
.
~ ec _ L ....... J
®
PALM BEACH COUNTY
NW
SW
BOULEVARD
STREAM
CANAL ;!
CITY OF '
BQCA RA TQN
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEACH
/~ POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS
MAP #3
MILE
I
AGGREGATE PARCELS OF LAND, WHICH ARE VACANT OR UNDERDEVELOPED, 5 ACRES
I i OR GREATER IN SIZE, AND HAVE A F.L.U.M. DESIGNATION OF LOW DENSITY, MEDIUM DENSITY,
GRAPHIC SCALE TRANSITIONAL, MIXED USE, OR RURAL RESIDENTIAL
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA LEGEND:
Q PLANNING ~ I ' / CI1~ UMITS ...................
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER (ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
APRIL 2001
SUPPORT DOCUMENT #3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-1
POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS TABLE
POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS
MARCH 2000
ID#
LAND USE
DESIGNATION
CURRENT
ZONING
ACRES
MAXIMUM
POTENTIAL
UNITS
102
128
157
104
116
111
161
146
114
127
159
151
155
LOW DENSITY
LOW DENSITY
LOW DENSITY
MEDIUM DENSITY
MEDIUM DENSITY
MEDIUM DENSITY
MEDIUM DENSITY
MEDIUM DENSITY
TRANSITIONAL
TRANSITIONAL
REDEVELOPMENT AREA #6
PREVIOUS APPROVAL
PREVIOUS APPROVAL
CNTY
R-1-A & CF
R-1-AAA-B
CNTY
RM & RR
RM-8
PRD
RM-8
A
RM
PC
PRD
SAD
103.27
11.89
5.00
120.16
5.00
28.31
8.32
9.12
7.84
58.59
6.21
6.12
12.33
12.20
12.20
19.19
30.38
49.57
516.35
59.45
25.00
600.80
60.00
339.72
99.84
109.44
94.08
703.08
74.52
73.44
147.96
195.20
19~20
139.00
300.00
439.00
GRAND TOTALS:
ACRES
252.85
UNITS
2,086.04
SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 4
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-1
REVISED POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS TABLE
POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS
APRIL 2001
ID#
LAND USE
DESIGNATION
CURRENT
ZONING
ACRES
MAXIMUM
POTENTIAL
UNITS
102
128
104
161
115
114
127
151
155
146
111
116
159
LOW DENSITY
LOW DENSITY
MEDIUM DENSITY
MEDIUM DENSITY
MEDIUM DENSITY
TRANSITIONAL
TRANSITIONAL
PREVIOUS APPROVAL
PREVIOUS APPROVAL
PREVIOUS APPROVAL
PREVIOUS APPROVAL
PREVIOUS APPROVAL
PREVIOUS APPROVAL
CNTY
R-1-A & CF
CNTY
PRD
RR & CF
A
RM
PRD
SAD
RM-8
RM-8
RM
PC
103.27
11.89
115.16
5.00
9.12
8.66
621
6.12
12.33
19.19
30.38
7.84
8.32
19.65
12.20
97.58
516.35
59.45
575.80
60.00
109.44
103.92
273.36
74.52
73 44
147.96
139.00
300.00
72.00
230.00
165.00
166.00
1,072.00
GRAND TOTALS:
ACRES
247.85
UNITS
2,069.12
SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 5
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-1
FANELLI FLUM AMENDMENT STAFF REPORT
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT---
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
ITEM:
GENERAL DATA:
W~,ter Serv~c,e ...............
Sewer Serv~c,e .........
April 16, 2001
IV.C.
Annexation with Initial Zoning of GC (General Commercial) and Associated Future
Land Use Map Amendment from County HR-8 (High Density Residential 8
units/acre) to City GC (General Commercial) for the Fanelli Property, Located on
the East Side of Military Trail, North of West Atlantic Avenue (Immediately East of
the Boys Farmers Market).
OwnedApphcant ................ Anthony Fanelli
Agent ........................ Weber & Aronson, P.A.
Location .................. East side of Military Trail, north
of West Atlantic Avenue
Property S~ze ................ 2 65 Onclud~ng easement)
Ex~stmg F.L U M Des~gnauon. .. County HR-8 (H~gh Density
Residential 8 units/acre)
Proposed F L U M Designation C~ty GC (General Commercial)
Ex~st~ng Zoning ......... County AR (Agricultural
Residential)
Proposed Zoning .............. City GC (General Commemal)
Aa~asen. t Zoning .......... North City CF (Community Faciht~es)
East C~ty R-1-A (Single Family
Residential)
South City A (Agricultural)
Wes-, City GC & County RS (Single
Family Residential)
Ex~stmg Land Use ....................... Two single family homes
Pro2osed Land Use ................. Proposed construction of a
10,000 sq. ft. refrigeration cooler
and parking to serve the adjacent
Boys Farmers Market.
......... N/A
............ N/A.
OFT/CE DEPOT
-- --~ST ~ ATLANTIC A~NU[
~, , I
~z~ fi~ / ~z~ I ~
lV.C.
The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation on a
Voluntary Annexation (pursuant to Florida Statute 171.044), and a Future
Land Use Map amendment from County HR-8 (High Density Residential -
8 units per acre) to City GC (General Commercial) with initial zoning of GC
(General Commercial) for the Fanelli Property.
LDR Sections 2.4.5 (A), (C) and (D) provide rules and procedures for the
processing of this petition.
The subject property is located on the east side of Military Trail
approximately 2,300 feet north of Atlantic Avenue, behind the existing
Boys Farmers Market.
The subject property is currently located in Unincorporated Palm Beach County within
the City's Planning Area (Future Annexation Area). The property consists of four
parcels under common ownership including an access tract connecting it to Military
Trail. The owner is seeking voluntary annexation at this time. Two single family
residences exist on two of the existing parcels. In February 2001, the Palm Beach
County Building Department issued a permit to construct a 10,000 sq.ft, cold storage
building located on the southern parcel.
Requests for Annexation, Future Land Use 'Map amendment and Initial Zoning have
been submitted and are now before the Board for action.
The 2.65 acre property has a County Future Land Use Map designation of HR-8 (High
Density Residential 8 units per acre) and County zoning of AR (Agricultural
Residential). The proposal is to annex the .property into the City, change the Future
Land Use Map designation to City GC (General Commercial), and apply an initial zoning
designation of GC (General Commercial). The proposed use of the property is for the
10,000 sq. f. cooler and additional parking to serve the existing Boys Farmers Market.
Current Land Use Designations: The current County land use map designation for the
property is County HR-8 (High Density R~sidential- 8 du/ac). The current City
"advisory" designation for this property is TRN (Transitional). It is noted that the City's
FLUM designation as initially contained on the City's Future Land Use Map adopted in
November 1989, (and as subsequently formally amended) is deemed to be advisory
until an Official Future Land Use Map Amendment is processed.
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Fanelli Property - Annexation with Initial Zoning of GC and Future Land Use Map Amendment
Page 2
Requested Land Use Designation: The requested Future Land Use Map change is to
City GC (General Commercial).
Land Use Analysis:
Pursuant to Land Development Regulations Section 3.1.1(A) (Future Land Use Map), all
land uses and resulting structures must be allowed in the zoning district within which the
land is situated and, said zoning must be consistent with the land use designation as
shown on the Future Land Use Map.
The accompanying annexation and initial zoning application is seeking a GC (General
Commercial) zoning designation. The proposed use of a cooler and parking expansion
of the Boys Farmers Market is allowed as a permitted use within the GC zoning district.
The GC land use designation is consistent with the proposed GC zoning designation.
Consistency between the City and County Land Use Designations:
The existing County Future Land Use Map designation for the property is HR-8 (High
Density Residential - 8 units per acre). The City "advisory" TRN (Transitional) Land Use
designation is consistent with the County designation in that Multiple Family Residential
zoning districts are permitted within the designation. However, the TRN designation also
allows limited commercial development at an intensity equivalent to that of medium
density residential land uses. The applicant's request for a GC (General Commercial)
Future Land Use Map designation allows multi-family development as well as a variety
of commercial and office uses. Since the commercial development allowed within the
City's advisory TRN and the proposed GC Land Use designations, is not permitted
within the existing County HR-8 designation, neither designation is wholly consistent
with the County Designation. However, the.property is located immediately behind a
commercial use with access through the commercial development. Under these
circumstances, commercial development is also appropriate for the subject property.
REQUIRED FINDINGS:
Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7: Amendments to the Future Land Use Map
must be based upon the following findings:
Demonstrated Need - That there is a need for the requested land use. The
need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic
trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character
and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a
comprehensive plan objective or policy, or similar circumstances. The need
must be supported by data and analysis. This policy shall not apply to
requests for the FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open
Space.
The proposal involves annexation of property, which requires changing the FLUM
designation from County to City. As stated earlier, the proposed GC (General
Commercial) FLUM designation allows a variety of commercial, office, and multi-
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Fanelli Property - Annexation with Initial Zoning of GC ;)nd Future Land Use Map Amendment
Page 3
family residential uses. The subject property is located immediately behind the
existing Boys Farmers Market--an intense retail commercial operation with a large
customer base. A US Post Office is located immediately north of the Boys Farmers
Market and is also very intense in its operation. The subject property must take
access from Military Trail, between these two properties. Military Trail is an arterial
roadway, which intensely developed with commercial development expanding
northward from the Atlantic Avenue intersection. While the means of access and the
intensity of the surrounding area makes the two existing single family homes on the
property inappropriate, this same intensity has helped the Boys Farmers Market
enjoy great success in this location. The proposed land use change will
accommodate the 10,000 sq. ft. cooler and additional parking which The Boys now
needs to meet customer demand. The predominant FLUM designation for
properties fronting on Military Trail in the area is General Commercial. Given the
existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, the proposed
GC designation is the most appropriate for the subject property and is consistent
with this Policy of the Comprehensive Plan.
13 Consistency - The requested designation is consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan.
As stated above, the proposal is consistent with FLUE Policy A-1.7. The following are
the other applicable goals, objectives and policies.
Future Lend Use Element Objective A-f: Property shall be developed or
redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate in
terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is
complementary to adjacent uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs.
The subject property does not have any unique environmental characteristics that would
prohibit development of the site or require mitigation measures. The property can be
developed in a manner that will be complementary to the adjacent residential area to
.the east. Under the GC FLUM designation, development of this property can provide
'for expansion of an existing business, which is complementary to the surrounding area.
With review of a specific development proposal this policy will be revisited.
13 Concurrency - Development at the highest intensity possible under the
requested designation can meet the adopt.ed concurrency standards.
As discussed later in this report, the property can be developed at the highest intensity
allowed under the GC land use designation and meet adopted concurrency standards.
The proposal is to annex the property with an initial zoning designation of GC, to
accommodate a proposed 10,00 sq. ft. cooler and parking associated with the
expansion of the Boys Farmers Market, as a permitted use.
13 Compatibility - The requested designation will be compatible with the existing
and future land uses of the surrounding area.
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Fanelli Property - Annexation with Initial Zoning of GC and Future Land Use Map Amendment
Page 4
The property is surrounded by the following Future Land Use Map Designations, Zoning
Designations and Land Uses:
North: The subject property is bordered on the north by a United States Post Office,
which is located in the City of Delray Beach with a Future Land Use Map designation of
CF (Community Facilities) and a CF (Community Facilities) zoning designation.
Eash The subject property is bordered on the east by an existing single family
development (Lee's Crossing), with a Future Land Use Map designation of LD (Low
Density Residential) and an R-1-A (Single Family Residential) zoning designation.
South: The subject property is bordered on the south by a vacant parcel of land, which
is located in the City of Deiray Beach with a Future Land Use Map designation of TRN
(Transitional) and an AR (Agricultural) zoning designation.
West'. The subject property is bordered on the west by the Boys Farmers Market, which
is located in the City of Delray Beach with a Future Land Use Map designation of GC
(General Commercial) and a GC (General Commercial) zoning designation.
As described in the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the advisory
Transitional land use designation is applied to land which is usually developed, or to be
developed, for either residential or nonresidential uses. The proposed FLUM
designation of GC, however will allow for the expansion of the Boys Farmers Market,
which has co-existed with the residential development to the east for many years. It is
anticipated that the cooler and parking expansion will not increase the intensity of the
existing Market. Compatibility with the abutting residential properties is not a major
concern, however, there are sufficient regulations in place which will mitigate any
potential adverse impacts. With the proposed improvements, trees must be installed
every 25' along the east property line abutting Lee's Crossing (a single family
development) and every 30' along the north and south property lines. Additionally, a
perimeter wall surrounding the property on the north, east and south sides should be
considered to further mitigate adverse impacts. The proposed GC FLUM designation is
"compatible with existing and future land uses of the surrounding area.
Compliance - Development under the requested designation will comply with the
provisions and requirement of the Land Development Regulations.
Compliance with the Land Development Regulations will be further addressed with
review of a site plan approval request. It is anticipated that there should be no problems
complying with the Land Development Regulations.
Florida Statutes Governing Voluntary Annexations:
Pursuant to Florida Statute 171.044 "the owner or owners of real properties in an
unincorporated area of the County, which is c,ontiguous to a municipality and reasonably
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Fanelli Property - Annexation with Initial Zoning of GC and Future Land Use Map Amendment
Page 5
compact may petition the governing body of said municipality that said property be
annexed to the municipality". Pursuant to F.S. 171.044 (5) "land shall not be annexed
through voluntary annexation when such annexation results in the creation of enclaves".
Pursuant to F.S. 171.031(13), an "enclave" is (1) any unincorporated improved or
developed area that is enclosed within and bounded on all sides by a single
municipality; or, (2) any unincorporated improved or developed area that is enclosed
within and bounded by a single municipality and a natural or manmade obstacle that
allows the passage of vehicular traffic to that unincorporated area only through the
municipality.
The property is contiguous with the City, is reasonably compact and is currently an
enclave, as it is bounded on all sides by the City.
Annexation of the property will eliminate an enclave.
Land Development Regulations Governing Annexations:
Pursuant to the Land Development Regulations Section 2.4.5 (C)(1)'~he owner of land
may seek the annexation of contiguous property, under his/her ownership" pursuant to
Florida Statutes. The property owner has voluntarily petitioned for this annexation.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Designated Annexation Area: The territory to be annexed is located within designated
annexation area "C" on the east side of Military Trail behind the Boys Farmers Market
approximately 2,300 feet north of Atlantic Avenue. Annexation of the territory is
consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy B-3.5, which calls for annexation of
eligible properties through voluntary annexations as the opportunities arise.
CONCURRENCY:
Provision of Services: When annexation of property occurs, services are to be
provided in a manner which is consistent, with services provided to other similar
properties already in the City (Future Land Use Element Policy B-3.1). The following is
a discussion of required services and the manner in which they will be provided.
Police: This property is currently serviced by the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office,
located at 345 South Congress, which serves the South County area. The property lies
within Sheriff patrol zone 4. Zone 4 is bordered by El Clair Ranch Road on the west,
the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Boynton Beach on the north, and Atlantic Avenue to the
south. One officer is assigned to a particular zone during a shift (three shifts per day).
Additional response can be mustered from "Cover Cars" which roam throughout zones
randomly, depending on their availability in South County during that time.
The City of Delray Beach's Police Department has 14 cars per shift patrolling a 15
square mile area; and, as a consequence, significantly improved response time should
be realized. Annexation will not require additional manpower, as the police currently
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Fanelli Property - Annexation with Initial Zoning of GC and Future Land Use Map Amendment
Page 6
pass the property while patrolling areas of the City to the north and south of the
property.
Fire and Emergency Services: The annexation of this property will not require
additional manpower. The municipal area is served by Fire Station No. 4 (Barwick &
Lake Ida Roads).
With annexation, the property will receive an improvement in response time from the
current 5.5 minutes of the County Fire Department (Indian Springs/Military Trail and
Woolbright Road) to approximately 3 minutes for the City's Fire Department (Fire
Station No. 4 at Barwick and Lake Ida Roads).
Water: Water service is currently provided to the existing residences via a well system.
Water service available via installation of an 8" water main along the north side of the
property which would connect to the existing main along the east side of Military Trail
and the stub-out at the adjacent Lee's Crossing subdivision. Connection to the City
system is not anticipated at this time, however it may be in the future with
redevelopment of the property. Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan, treatment
capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out.
Sewer: Sewage is currently accommodated on-site via a septic system. An 8" main is
located along the east side of Military Trail as well as within the Lee's Crossing
subdivision to the east. Connection to the City system is not anticipated at this time
however may be in the future with redevelopment of the property. Pursuant to the
Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the South Central County Waste
Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out.
Streets: This property has direct access to Military Trail via a 30' access easement.
Military Trail is under the jurisdiction of Palm Beach County. The jurisdictional
responsibility and the associated maintenance responsibility will not change upon
annexation. Development of the property under the current County HR-8 designation
' would generate 210 trips based upon 21 units. An increase in vehicular trips would be
realized under either the TRN (Transitional) or GC (General Commercial) land use
designations. Utilizing a floor area ratio of 25% it is calculated that an additional 18,888
sq. ft. of retail could be accommodated. This would generate approximately 1,740
additional average daily trips. This development would require site plan approval and
would involve a full analysis of the traffic impact. However, there is adequate capacity
on Military Trail to accommodate additional trips under either scenario.
Parks and Open Space: The annexation of the property to accommodate the 10,000
sq. ft. cooler and parking expansion of the Boys Farmers Market will not create an
additional impact on park and recreational facilities.
Solid Waste: The existing single family homes generate 3.98 tons of solid waste per
year (1.99 x 2). The warehouse will generate 26 tons per year (5.2 lbs. per sq. ft.).
There is adequate capacity to accommodate the trash generated by this property. The
service provider will not change, as described later in this report.
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Fanelli Property - Annexation with Initial Zoning of GC and Future Land Use Map Amendment
Page 7
Financial Impacts:
Effect Upon Annexed Property:
For the 2000 tax year the subject property had an assessed value of $281,245. With
the change from County to City jurisdiction, the following taxes and rates will be
affected:
Ad Valorem Taxes
Millage
With Annexation
Fire/Rescue MSTU
Library
City of Delray Beach
City of Delray Beach Debt
2.9129 Deleted (County)
.5246 Deleted (County)
7.2600 Added (City)
.6900 Added (City)
4.5125 Difference*
* Total tax millage in the County is 19.6117 mills while in the City the total millage rate
is 24.1242 mills.
The current yearly ad valorem taxes are $ 5,527.04. With annexation the yearly ad
valorem taxes will be $ 6,784.81; a tax difference of $1,257.77. In addition to property
taxes, the following Non Ad Valorem fiscal impositions apply:
Delray Beach Storm Water Utility - This assessment is based upon the percentage of
impervious area of the buildings, parking areas, etc. For non-residential units the
assessment fee is calculated using the following formula (# sq.ft, of impervious
area/2,502) X $54. A 25% discount from the assessment is available if drainage is
retained on site. Also a 25% discount from the assessment is available because the
subject property is located within the Lake Worth Drainage District. As the property
contains a non-residential use, this assessment would be imposed in the amount of
approximately $215.83. A further increase will be realized with future development of
.the site.
Solid Waste Authority - This annexation area is serviced by BFI, and the City's
contract is currently through BFI (Browning-Ferris Industries). Therefore, the waste
service provider will remain with BFI upon annexation.
Occupational License Fees - The proposed cooler and parking improvements are an
expansion of an existing business, which is located in the City. Therefore, as a new
business is not being established occupational license fees will not be imposed.
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Fanelli Property - Annexation with Initial Zoning of GC and Future Land Use Map Amendment
Page 8
Resulting Impacts to Property Owner:
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
AD VALOREM TAXES
(Change from 00/01 County of
19.6117 to City 00/01 rate 24.1242
mills.(4.5125)
+$1,257.77
NON AD VALOREM
Stormwater Assessment
$ 215.83
ANNUAL FINANCIAL IMPACT:
+$1,473.60
SERVICE CONSIDERATIONS:
FIRE RESPONSE
+ Faster response time from (estimated time)
5.5 minutes (County) to 3.0 minutes (City)
EMS
+ Faster response time from (estimated time)
5.5 minutes (County) to 3.0 minutes (City)
POLICE
+ Bette~' response based upon more officers in
field.
CODE ENFORCEMENT
+ Pro-active vs. reactive opportunity to work
with property owners
Fiscal Impacts to the City: At the 2000/2001 City operating millage rate of 7.26 mills and
debt rate of 0.69 mills, the property will generate approximately $2,235.90 in new ad
valorem taxes per year. VVith future development, additional revenues will be realized
through increased assessment value, building permit fees, the annual collection of the
stormwater assessment fee as well as utility taxes (9.5% electric, 7% telephone, 8.7%
gas) and franchise fees on electric, telephone, gas, and cable.
REQUIRED FINDINGS: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(C)(4), the City Commission
must make findings that the annexation is consistent with Objective B-3 of the
Future Land Use Element, and complies with F.S. 171.
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Fanelli Property - Annexation with Initial Zoning of GC and Future Land Use Map Amendment
Page 9
As stated above, the subject property is located within a designated annexation area,
Area C. Its annexation is consistent with the Objective B-3 of the Future Land Use
Element. Also, the annexation complies with Florida States Statutes Section 171 as it
pertains to annexations.
The proposed City zoning designation is GC (General Commercial) while the current
County zoning designation is AR (Agricultural Residential). The zoning designations of
the surrounding properties are identified in the Future Land Use Map Amendment
Analysis section of this report.
REQUIRED FINDINGS: (Chapter 3)
Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of
development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part
of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the
application, the Staff Report or Minutes. Findings shall be made by the body,
which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These
findings relate to the following four areas:
Future Land Use Map, Concurrency and Comprehensive Plan Consistency were
previously discussed under the "Future Land Use Map Amendment and Annexation
Analysis" sections of this report. Compliance with the Land Development
Regulations with respect to Standards .for Rezoning Actions and Rezoning
Findings are discussed below:
Section 3.2.1 (Basis for Determining Consistency): The performance standards
set forth in this Article either reflect a policy from the Comprehensive Plan or a
principle of good planning practice. The performance standards set forth in the
following sections as well as compliance with items specifically listed as required
. findings in appropriate portions of Section 2.4.5 shall be the basis upon which a
'finding of overall consistency [Section 3.1.1(C)] is to be made. However,
exclusion from this Article shall not be a basis for not allowing consideration of
other objectives and policies found in the adopted Comprehensive Plan in the
making of a finding of overall consistency.
Section 3.2.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions): Standard A, B, C and E are not
applicable with respect to this rezoning request. The applicable performance
standards of Section 3.2.2 are as follows:
D)
That the rezoning shall result in allowing land uses which are deemed
compatible with adjacent and nearby land uses both existing and
proposed; or that if an incompatibility may occur, that sufficient
regulations exist to properly mitigate adverse impacts from the new use.
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Fanelli Property - Annexation with Inibal Zoning of GC and Future Land Use Map Amendment
Page 10
The initial GC zoning designation will accommodate a 10,000 sq. ft. cooler and
parking expansion to the Boys Farmers Market as permitted uses. Compatibility
with the adjacent residential develop .merit is a concern, however any potential
adverse impacts can be properly mitigated through the applicable requirements
of the Land Development Regulations. The GC zoning district requires a
minimum 10' front, side and rear building setback. Additionally, there is a 25%
minimum open space requirement. Further, trees must be planted every 25'
within the landscape strips abutting residential uses. Finally, installation of a wall
on the east side of the property should be considered. In order to utilize the
subject property for the intended purpose, site plan approval must be obtained.
Upon annexation a site plan will soon follow. Compatibility of a specific
development proposal with the adjacent developments will relate to the ultimate
intensity of the development and will be appropriately addressed with the review
of a site and development plan request.
Section 2.4.$(D)(5) (Rezoning Findings):
Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(D)(5), in addition to the provisions of Section 3.1.1, the
City Commission must make a finding that the rezoning fulfills one of the reasons
for which the rezoning change is being sought. These reasons include the
following:
That the zoning had previously been changed, or was originally
established, in error;
That there has been a change in circumstances which make the current
zoning inappropriate;
C8
That the requested zoning is of similar intensity as allowed under the
Future Land Use Map and that it is more appropriate for the property based
upon circumstances particular to the site and/or neighborhood.
Items "b" and "c" are the basis for which the rezoning should be granted. The property
is in the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, however, it is within the City of
Delray Beach reserve annexation area. The 'applicant is applying for annexation of this
property into the City and the annexation requires that an appropriate City zoning
designation be applied. The requested GC (General Commercial) zoning is of similar
intensity as that allowed under the proposed City GC Future Land Use Map designation.
As stated previously, the GC FLUM designation is appropriate given the property's
location on Military Trail and access is provided through a commercial site.
COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS:
There are currently two single family residences which exist on the property, which will
become nonconforming upon annexations. However these structures will be
demolished to accommodate additional parking. Any future development will be
required to comply with all Land Development Regulations.
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Fanelli Property - Annexation with Initial Zoning of GC and Future Land Use Map Amendment
Page 1 1
The subject property is not in a geographical area requiring review by the CRA
(Community Redevelopment Agency), DDA (Downtown Development Authority) or the
HPB (Historic Preservation Board).
Palm Beach County Notice:
On March 28, 2001 the Palm Beach County Planning Division was notified of the City's
intent to annex this property. To date, a response has not been received.
IPARC Notice:
Notice of the Future Land Use Map Amendment was also provided to the Interlocal Plan
Amendment Review Committee (IPARC) which distributes the information to adjacent
municipalities. To date, a response has not been received.
Courtesy Notice:
Courtesy notices were 'sent to the following homeowner's and civic associations:
El Progressive Residents of Delray
El President's Council
El Hamlet
[3 Chatelaine
El Sherwood Forest
[3 Country Manor
[3 High Point Section 6 & 7
El Highland Trailer Park
[3 Pine Trail
[3 Sunset Pines
[3 Rainberry Woods
Public Notice:
Formal public notice has been provided to all property owners within a 500 foot radius of
the subject property. Letters of objection, if any, will be presented at the Planning and
Zoning Board meeting.
Accommodating the annexation of this property is consistent with the City's program for
annexation of territory within its Planning and Service Area. The requested GC
(General Commercial) Future Land Use Map designation is appropriate considering that
proposed expansion of the existing Boys Farmers Market and that the property is
located behind commercial development w~th access provided through commercial
property. The application of an initial zoning designation of GC is consistent with the
proposed FLUM designation.
The annexation will provide the property with better Police, Fire, EMS and Code
Enforcement services. The property will experience an increase in ad valorem taxes.
Upon development of the property for residential purposes, storrnwater assessment
fees will be imposed.
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Fanelli Property - Annexation with Initial Zoning of GC and Future Land Use Map Amendment
Page 12
The City will receive additional revenue from property taxes, in addition to stormwater
assessment fees, utility taxes, franchise fees, and licensing fees upon development.
The total immediate revenue increase is approximately $2,235.90 a year.
If the annexation is approved, it is anticipated that a site and development plan
submittal will follow. Compatibility of a specific development proposal with the adjacent
developments will be addressed with the review of a site and development plan request.
Concurrency concerns with respect to traffic will dictate the development time frame.
A. Continue with direction.
Recommend approval of the Annexation, Future Land Use Map amendment from
County HR-8 to City GC (General Commercial) and initial zoning designation of
GC (General Commercial) based upon positive findings with respect to Future
Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment
Findings), LDR Sections 3.1.1, 3.2.2, and 2.4.5(D)(5), and the following:
That the property is contiguous, reasonably compact and does not create
an enclave; and,
That services will be provided to the property in a manner similar to other
similar properties within the City.
Recommend denial of the Annexation, Future Land Use Map amendment from
County HR-8 to City GC (General Commercial) and initial zoning designation of
GC (General Commercial), with the basis stated.
Recommend approval of this Annexation, Future Land Use Map amendment from
County HR-8 to City GC (General Commercial) and initial zoning designation of GC
(General Commercial) based upon positive findings with respect to Future Land Use
Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), LDR
Sections 3.1.1, 3.2.2, and 2.4.5(D)(5), and the following:
That the property is contiguous, reasonably compact and does not create an
enclave; and,
That services will be provided to the property in a manner similar to other similar
properties within the City.
Attachments:
[~ Location/Existing Zoning Map
[~ Existing Future Land Use Map
[~ Survey
This Report prepared by: Michelle E. Ho¥1and, Senior Planner
3RD $1 z
~L~
FANELLI ANNE~TION
ZONING DESIGNATIONS -
CONKuN DR~V[
~RD
~UI SED~A CmRC~ '
~ POST
~ ' BARR[TT ST
BOY5
FARMERS m ~
-- E LW OD R
~ ~'rl" r ~z~- ~ .....
TRN~.~.~
Pc~z~~ ~-
DELRA Y ~
WEST ATLAN ~1 C AVENUE
N
~ FANELLI ANNE~TION
c,T~ ~ ~L.*~ e~.:., r~ - EXISTING FUTURE ~ND USE DESIGNATION -
PLANN~ ~ Z~ING
3.00.00' ~ ~,~.
/.
/
o/
SKETCH OF SURVEY
(BOUNDARY)
SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 6
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-1
EXISTING MAP SERIES
L-30 CANAL
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
STREAM
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
LAKE IDA ROAD
NW
ATLANTIC S W
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LINTON BOULEVARD
BOULEVARD
L-38 CANAL C-15 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEA CH
PLANNIN6 AREA
MAP # 1
ORAPHIC SCALE
LEGEND: PLANNING AREA .... CITY LIMITS ...................
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA (ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF GULF STREAM TOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH COUNTY JURISDICTION
AUGUST 1999 (WATER SERVICE) (SEWER & FIRE SERVICE)
L-30 CANAL
LAKE IDA ROAD
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
STREAM
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
ATLANTIC
i i
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LINTON BOULEVARD
NW
sw
BOULEVARD
~-58 CANAL C '5 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEACH
POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS
MAP 113
MILE
I
AGGREGATE PARCELS OF LAND, WHICH ARE VACANT OR UNDERDEVELOPED, ,5 ACRES
J ~ OR GREATER IN SIZE, AND HAVE A F.L U.M DESIGNATION OF LOW DENSITY, MEDIUM DENSITY,
GRAPHIC SCALE TRANSITIONAL, MIXED USE, OR RURAL RESIDENTIAL.
C13¥ OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA LEGEND:
O PLANNING AREA ..... CITY UMITS ...................
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER' (ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
MARCH 20O0
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
s / Ec
....... Lg30 CANAL
!
, I
SF ,
LAKE IDA ROAD
SF
COM
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
!
i
L ....
COM
ATLANTIC
$F ~ VCA.
SF
LOWSON BOULEVARD
MF ~
CF
.MF
; SF
LINTON BOULEVARD
!
iSFi
COM ! '
L-38 CANAL
SF/REC
PALM BEACH COUNTY
NW
SW
BOULEVARD
CANAL
SF COM
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON SF
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEA CH
GRAPHIC SCALE
CiTY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING z.. ZONING DEPARTMENT
AUGUST 1999
;ENERALIZED ADJACENT LAND U5E5
/RAP #4
SF - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
~'F - MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
PLANNING AREA ·
(ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
CF - COMMUNITY FACILITIES
REC- RECREATION
CITlf LIMITS ...................
COM- COMMERCIAL
IND -INDUSTRIAL
VACANT &
VC.~ - AGRICULTURE
. iL;lO CANAL
LAKE IDA ROAD
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
N W 2ND
ATLANTIC
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LINTON BOULEVARD
BOULEVARD
L-38 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
C-15 CANAL
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEACH
GRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & ZONING DEP~RTMENT
AUGUST 1999
WELLFIELD PROTEETION AREA5
ZONE5 OF INFLLIEN£E I~IAP #6
LEGEND'
ZONE 4 -f ZONE 3, -/ ZONE 2 - ZONE 1 - 0 LOCATION OF WELL - ·
SOURCE P.B.C. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOUCES - WATER RESOUCES OIVISION, JUNE 1993
PLANNING AREA .... COUNTY
(ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY) CITY LIMITS ................... JURISDICTION
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
i
r ........
J ~ Ii A~ANTIC ~ .
i LINTON BOULEVARD
~ i ' ~1~ I
C
PALM BEACH COUNTY
NW
S.W
15
CITY QF
BOCA RA TON
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEA CH
GRAPHIC SCALE
CI~Y OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING &: ZONING DEPARTMENT
AUGUST 1999
5PE£1AL FLOOD HAZARD AREA5
MAP #7
LEGEND PLANNING AREA
(ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
SPECIAL HAZARD AREAS
?
CITY
LIMITS
INUNDATED BY IO0-YEAR FLOOD L .....
SOURCE JANUARY 5, 1989, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
TOWN OF
i LINTON BOULEVARD
' ' I ~ ~"
! i I ~ ,---'
L-~B CANAL ~ C-~S CANA~ ~ ~/2 BEACH
PALM BEACH COUNTY C,~J
BOCA RA TON
HISTORIE DI5TRIET5 & 5lTD5
~AP ~8
I Ml~ I A. - NASSAU P~K P~NNING
G~H~C ~E B. - OLD SCHOOL SQU~E HISTORIC DISTRICTS - ~ (ULTI~ CI~ aOUND~
C.- DEL-IDA PARK
C~ OF DEL~Y B~CH, ~ORIDA
P~NNING ~ Z~ING DEP~TMENT D. - MARINA DISTRICT HISTORIC SITES - · C~ U~TS
E - WEST S~LERS ...................
AUGU~ 1999
i IL~jO CANAL
LAKE IDA ROAD
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
NW
ATLANTIC
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LtNTON BOULEVARD
SW
BOULEVARD
L-38 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
C 15 CANAL
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEACH
GRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF DELRAY BF..ACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
AUGUST 1999
TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA
IT.£.E.A.I MAP II9
LEGEND:
PLANNING AREA ~-
(ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
CITY LIMITS ...................
TOWN OF
· ,~,,,.=.-, ,~ uu, ,.,u~,. ~=.,-, ,.,,.,
BOYNTON BEACH JI I
'I ............................ '-"~ '
I
I ill[ ............ ~ d g///u
~t~F ....... ~ ~. ........ --~ ~ ~ ~, t I~L ~],
- ~ ~ . 2ND ST -
j ~ ~"
>i i ,i 2: ~ ~ ~--.'
. ) i
I- ;Ii I%¢1 I~ ~j:~, TOW~Or
~ i J ~ k~M) Ii: ~ HIGHLAND
/ '-': ....... %'-~'%'-~'%'-~'%'~% ....... %-~ 2 ~' ~'~-'~-;-
BOCA RA TON
~ LOEATION OF NATIVE ECOSYSTEm5
~AP ~0
LEGEND: P~NINO AR~ ~ - I
G~HIC SC~E 1. LEON WEEKES ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVE
(ULTI~ CI~ BOUN~)
2. HURRICANE PINES
C~ OF DEL~Y B~CH, FLORIDA 5. AT~NTIC DUNES PARK CI~ U~ ...................
P~NING ~ Z~ING DEP~TMENT
4. DEL~Y OAKS COU~ JURISDIC~ON
AUGU~ 1 gg9
BOYNTON BEACH
L-30 CANAL
+ + + + I
..... i LOWSON " BOULEVARD
AREAiIiI[IiI-B-i'Ii Iq i UNTON ~BOULEVARD
eoc ~ AREA -A-
E-~8 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
ANNEXATION
AREA5
MAP # i !
ALL ANNEXATION AREAS
ARE UNDER
COUNTY JURISDICTION
CITY LIMITS
PLANNING AREA
(ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
GRAPHIC SCALE:
Cl~' OF DEl..RAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING &: ZONING DEPARTMENT
AUGUST 1997
Sw 25
N.T.S
COCONUT LN
C.~ /./M/TS
///
!_J~£ IDA RD
ATLAN'nC A¥£
1 ST
SE 1 ST
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
LO.SON BLVD
J
I I
LINTON BLVD
CITY IJMIT$
AUGUST 1999
SOURCES FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS AND PALM BEACH COUNTY ROAD MAINTENANCE INVENTORY UST
FUTURE TRAFFIE NETWORK
LEGEND, MAP t/12
~ - STATE PRINCIPAL ~ - COUNTY PRINCIPAL - CiTY MINOR
ARTERIAL ARTERIAL ARTERIAL
~ - STATE MINOR ~ - COUNTY MINOR ~ - CiTY COLLECTOR
ARTERIAL ARTERIAL LOCAL ROADS AND
~ - STATE COLLECTOR ~...,m, - COUNTY COLLECTOR ROADWAYS OUTSIDE CITY
SLD
i COCONUT LN Cl/'~ /../M/TS
F /
j ~ __. 2LU 6LD /t
I ~o -~-'~ ~~- ] ! ! II ATLANTIC
4LO i := 4-LU '~
4LD ~ ~
i I 2LU U ___
~' EXISTIN~ ROADWAY LANEA~ES
~ LEGENd=
AUGUST 1999 6LD - ROADWAY ~N~GE LU - ~NES UND~DED ~ - ~NES EXPRESSWAY
LD - ~NES DIVIDED * - UNDER CONDUCTION (LIMITED ACCESS)
SW 23 A~
N.T.S.
COCONUT LN
C.,'T~ L/MITS
///
L_
_J
ATLANTIC
! ST
1 ST
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
LOW,ON BLVD
L.
I I
LINTON BLVD
giT]' LIMITS
SOURCES FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS AND PALM BEACH COUNTY ROAD MAINTENANCE INVENTORY LIST
AUGUST 1999
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY
LEGEND, MAP # 14
BI~ - STATE PRINCIPAL ~ - COUNTY PRINCIPAL - CITY MINOR
ARTERIAL ARTERIAL ARTERIAL
mm - STATE MINOR ~ - COUNTY MINOR - CFt'Y COLLECTOR
ARTERIAL ARTERIAL LOCAL ROADS AND
mmm - STATE COLLECTOR mm - COUNTY COLLECTOR ROADWAYS OUTSIDE CITY
SW 25 AV~
27895-C
N .T.S.
COCONUT LN
lIMITS
22070-C
12069-0
LAKE IOA RD
I 85~6-c I
t ~
~1551-D
ATLANTIC AVE
26686-C
..:r,~-A
TRI-RA(L/
AMTRAK
23813-C
- GULF'STREAU
5662-C
NEBST
1 ST
1
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
LOWSON BLVO
51B70-E
30218-D
5205'-C ~,~,~F-A
40755-0
14141-C
UNTON BLVD 56121-D
I 6879'**-C 6851'**-C
I I //~;,_~
I ~
AUGUST 1999
29256-0
~IT~ IffMIT$
184B0-C
SOURCE WEST PALM BEACH URBAN STUDY AREA TRAFFIC COUNT PROGRAM.
NOTE
COUNTY STANDARDS SHOWN ON ALL
ROADWAYS STATE STANDARD IS PEAK
HOUR DIRECTIONAL DALLY TRAFFIC
DATA IS SHOWN FORINFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY ON STATE ROADS
EXISTIN6 (I 995) ANNUAL AVERA6E DALLY
TRAFFIC EONDITION$
LEGEND, MAP #15
1,i. 14.1-C - DALLY TRAFFIC AND LOS
ON COUNTY dc CITY ROADS (P) - PEAK SEASON COUNT ·~,AVERAGE OF* COUNTS NORTH
~,~',~,,~'-~ - DAILY TRAFFIC AND LOS · SOURCE CrTY OF DEL.RAY BEACH AND SOUTH
*·* SOURCE* CONSULTANT REPORT
ON STATE ROADS 1996 PEAK SEASON COUNT
1700-B
SW 23 AVE
6351'*'-F
N.T.S.
COCONUT LN
673-C
I-' 1833-B
L.
101g-F
LAKE IDA RD
61o-e I
1669-
164t-D
TRI-RAIL/
AMTRAK
1577-!
8383'**-F
671-B
NESST
~_11~19-C
1 ST
- GULFSTREAM
!
!
455-B
1 ST
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
LOWSON BLVD
1727-C
1439-8
221'-6 1817-6
UN'TON BLVO
556***-B ~54***-B
15~8-C
CIT'YLIM[~$ 1279-B
7402'**-£
406-D
616-B
1517-C
59g-B
I
I
I
AUGUST 1999
SOURCE: WEST PALM BEACH URBAN STUDY AREA TRAFFIC COUNT PROGRAM
EXISTINB [I 995] PEAK SEASON PM PEAK HOUR
PEAK DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
LEGEND, ,MAP #1&
1.517-C - PEAK SEASON PM PEAK * SOURCE. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH lc,* DETERMINED BY USING DETALILT
HOUR PEAK DIRECTION 1996 PEAK SEASON COUNT K AND D FACTORS FROM FDOT
TRAFF'IC AND LOS ** AVERAGE OF COUNTS NORTH AND SOUTH LOS MANUAL
I sw 25
I-
I
If- -::i
I
I~ ~,~,~ .... _~.
SOURCE P~M
~, INTER~ODAL FAEILITIE5
I
dp~ M~P
/
LEGEN~
AUGUST 1999 ~- ROUTE 2 ~- ROUTE l s ~ - EXI~ING FAClLI~
~- ROUTE 26 ~- ROUTE 25
SW 23 AVI~ ,~
COCONUT LN ! CI'~Y' /,/M/~$
ape MAJOR TRIP PRODUCERS/ATTRACTORS
AUGUST 1999
N.T S.
COCONUT LN
///
LAKE ID~ RD
ATLANTIC AVE
_J
3 TRI- RAIL/
i AMTRAK
1 ST
1 ST
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
LOW$ON BLVD
UNTON BLVO
1
I I
I I
L_.~
~IT~£1MI?$
SOURCE PALM BEACH COUNTY COMPREHENSIV[ EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
AUGUST 1999
HURRICANE EVACUATION ROUTE5
MAP #19
LEGEND= ~[~ -- EVACUATION ROUTE
,'-7--~' ' Urn, ~-~~ '/
~URCE M~ROPOLIT~ P~NING ORal.TmON OF P~M B~CH COUNt, 2015 COUN~ MO~L
~ PRIOR TO PRO~RA~MED I~PROVE~ENT5
7/28/97 LEGENd,
R~SED 3/2/99 ----- lOL ~- 4L P~ HOUR ST~D~D
C~ OF DEL~Y B~CH ~- 8L ~- 2L ONE-WAY ~- NOT SHOWN IN 2015 **- IUPROVEME~ INCLUDED
P~NI~ ~ ZONING DEPT ~- 6L ~- 2L COUN~ MODEL IN 2015 P~
SW 23 AVE
N.T.S,
L.J
L_
COCONUT LN
CIYY 1,1¥IY$
C D
LAKE IDA
ATLANTIC AV~
TEl-RAIL/
~U~4TRAK
LOWSON BLVO (S 10 ST)
LINTON BLVO
I I
I I
L_.J
'GUI. FSTREA~ BLV~
I
NE 8 ST
1 ST
1 ST
///
lIMITS
SOURCE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. WPBUSA 2015 PLAN UPDATE
7/28/97
REVISED ,3./5/99
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
PLANNING &: ZONING DEPT
LEGEND~
--- 10L
2015 £05T FEASIBLE PLAN
MAP #21
- 2L ONE-WAY YF _ PROJECTED TO MEET NOTE LOS IS SHOWN FOR
- NOT SHOWN ON 2015 YF ~ PEAK HOUR STANDARD OVER-CAPACITY UNKS ON
COST FEASIBLE PLAN - INCONSISTENT WITH EXHIBIT 16 FOR COMPARISON,
EXISTING LANES
TR - 35
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
~ e9C
.......... L~50 CAN. AL
LAKE IDA ROAD
All_ANTIC
NW
S.W
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LINTON BOULEVARD
i
BOULEVARD
L-38 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
C "rS CANAL
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEACH
POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS
MAP #3
I
AGGREGATE PARCELS Of LAND, WHICH ARE VACANT OR UNDERDEVELOPED. 5 ACRES
J I OR GREATER IN SIZE, AND HAVE A F.L U M. DESIGNATION OF LOW DENSITY, MEDIUM DENSITY,
GRAPHIC SCALE TRANSITIONAL, MIXED USE, OR RURAL RESIDENTIAL
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA LEGEND:
O PLANNING AREA .... CITY UMITS ...................
PLANNING &: ZONING DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: (ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
MARCH 2000
SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 7
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-1
PROPOSED MAP SERIES
TOWN OF
I~NL~ ~' I~ c~, NLON#I~A III ~" ~ ~ ' ~- ~
I~ ~~~ ~1 ~ 411/~) ~ ~ . I~ ~
~ ~ < ~ z
~ ~i~ ~ ~ '~ ~o~ - / ~// - ~'~ ~ Iii
I A 2ND ST
~~' 'VI ~~--~- II '~i
........ i :' ~ ~ ~ .
J . J ~ SW ~ lOTH ST Il i l ~ I i
~~i -'~~ ;'/ % I1~, ~ I~111
, I i · ~ ~ ~
,~11 L~J , I ~g Jl~ I~ ~ii=~
~~1i ......... ~ , ~/ /~ ~',
;!1i
~ i : ~~~ kuu) Ii ': HIGHLAND
' '-':'~- 'T'; ~:.~-'-~=-~== .... ~-'~:;~:-~ ~i1,''
BOCA RA TON
~ PLANNIN~ AREA
~AP ~ 1
I "'~ I
G~HIC S~
LEGEND: P~,;NG ~ .... C~ uu~ ...................
C~ OF OEL~Y B~CH. ~OR~DA (ULT~UATE C~ BOUNDS)
P~NNING ~ ZONING DEP~TMENT
T~N OF GULF STR~ TO~ OF HIGH.ND B~H COU~ JURISDIC~ON
~RIL 2~1 (WA~R SE~CE) (S~ER ~ FIRE ~CE)
i
i
L..J !
ATLANTIC
.... J i
.... L;3C CANAL
LAKE IDA ROAD
i
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LIN TON BOULEVARD
i !
L ....... J
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
NW
SW
BOULEVARD
L-38 CANAL C-15 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEACH
POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS
IItAP #$
I
AGGREGATE PARCELS Of LAND, WHICH ARE VACANT OR UNDERDEVELOPED, .5 ACRES
I ' OR GREATER IN SIZE, AND HAVE A F.L.U.M. DESIGNATION OF LOW DENSITY, MEDIUM DENSITY,
GRAPHIC SCALE TRANSITIONAL, MIXED USE, OR RURAL RESIDENTIAL.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA LEGEND
Q PLANNING AREA .... CITY LIMITS ...................
PLANNING &: ZONING DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER (ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
APRIL 2001
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
sr S /I EC
L-30 CANAL
--,
~ LAKE IDA ROAD
.. ....... J
L ..... , ~ i SF.i o°z
i A~ANnC
,~i '
Isr
' ~ , ~ ~ LO'ON BOULEVARD
~ 0 ~ --
MF~
JLINTON ~OULEVARD I ~ '/
CF-,~ i
MF ~ ~i i
~SF ~
.... = ....... = ....... = ..........................................
NW
SW
5 CANAL
SF/REC
PALM BEACH COUNTY
SF
BOULEVARD
SF
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON SF
COM
STREAM
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEA CH
GRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA
PLANNING ,I, ZONING DEPARTMENT
APRIL 2001
5ENERALIZED ADSA£ENT LAND USE5
SF- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
MF- MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
PLANNING AREA
(ULTIMATE cITY BOUNDARY)
MAP #4
CF - COMMUNITY FACILITIES
REC- RECREATION
CITY LIMITS ...................
COY-- COMMERCIAL
IND -INDUSTRIAL
VACANT &
VCA - AGRICULTURE
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
LAKE IDA ROAD
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
N W 2ND
ATLANTIC
AV[N
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LINTON BOULEVARD
S W 2ND
BOULEVARD
L-3B CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
CANAL
CITY OF
BOCA RA TQN
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEACH
GRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING Z,. ZONING DEPARTMENT
APRIL 2001
WELLFIELD PROTECTION AREA5
ZONE5 OF INFLUENCE IRAP #6
LEGEND
ZONE 4 -f ZONE 3 -f ZONE 2 - ZONE 1 - 0 LOCATION OF WELL - ·
SOURCE- P.B.C DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOUCES - WATER RESOUCES DMSION, JUNE 1993
PL.,~,NNING AREA .... COUNTY
(ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY) CiTY LIMITS ................... JURISDICTION
k\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'i
?,~,O
L-30 CANAL
LAKE IDA ROAD
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
STREAM
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
ATLANTIC
NW
SW
LOWSON BOULEVARD
UNTON BOULEVARD
L 58 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
CITY OF
BOCA RA TQN
TOWN OF
- ', ,, HIGHLAND
' '~J~: BEACH
GRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING &: ZONING DEPARTMENT
APRIL 2001
SPE£1AL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS
It7
LEGEND PLANNING AREA
(ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
SPECIAL HAZARD AREAS r .....
INUNDATED BY IO0-YEAR FLOOD L ....... ' CITY LIMITS ...................
SOURCE JANUARY 5. 1989, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
?
/ = I ! iL;lO CANAL
LAKE IDA ROAD
! ~L ......... _r~!
,7;3 ........... -&
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LINTON BOULEVARD
L-38 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
SW
BOULEVARD
C- ' 5 CANAL
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON
STREAM
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEACH
GRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF' DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
APRIL 2001
1-115TORI£ DISTRI£T5 & 51TE5
/HAP #8
A. - NASSAU PARK
B - OLD SCHOOL SQUARE
C - DEL-IDA PARK
D. - MARINA DISTRICT
E. - WEST SETTLERS
HISTORIC DISTRICTS -
HISTORIC SITES -
PLANNING AREA
(ULTIMATE ClIY BOUNDARY)
· CITY LIMITS
L-30 CANAL
LAKE IDA ROAD
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
N.W
ATLANTIC
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LINTON BOULEVARD
BOULEVARD
L-38 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
C-15 CANAL
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEA CH
GRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
APRIL 2001
TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA
[T.C.E.A.I MAP #9
LEGEND:
PLANNING AREA- -
(ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
CITY LIMITS ...................
CANAL
LAKE IDA ROAD
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
STREAM
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
LVD
NW
ATLAN~C
AVENL
SW
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LINTON BOULEVARD
L-}8 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
BOULEVARD
CANAL
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON
TOWN OF
HIGHLAND
BEACH
GRN3HIC SCN~
CI~ OF DEL~Y B~CH, ~ORIDA
P~NNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
ARRIL 2001
LOCATION OF NATIVE E£OSYSTEIH5
MAP
LEGEND.
1 LEON WEEKES ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVE
2. HURRICANE PINES
5. AT~NTIC DUNES PARK
4. DEL~Y OAKS
P~NING AR~ ....
(ULTIMATE Cl~BOUNDN~)
Cl~ UMI~ ...................
COU~ JURISDI~ION ~
BOYNTON BEACH
L-30 CANAL
! '~/ ...... ;.-.~i --x /
I. ~ .......
+ + + '~
'+"l- + '+
,owsoN BOU,*V^RD
?~C ~ '
~o .
,~ . ~ . LINTON BOULEVARD
'7.:~ i i c~'e, , -
.j ,
I[ ............................................................
L-38 CANAL
PAL~ BEACH COUNTY
ANNEXATION
AREA5
MAP # I !
ALL ANNEXATION AREAS
ARE UNDER
COUNTY JURISDICTION
CITY LIMITS
PLANNING AREA
(ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
GRAPHIC SCALE
crPf OF DEL.RAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
APRIL 2001
SW 23 AVE
N.T S.
COCONUT LN
gi77
Lm
L.
///
LAKE IDA RD
ATLANTIC AVE
LOWSON BLVD
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
BLVD
Cf?~' I. IMIT$
SOURCES' FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS AND PALM BEACH COUNTY ROAD MAINTENANCE INVENTORY MST
PLANNING &: ZONING
DEPARTMENT
APRIL 2001
FUTURE TRAFFIC NETWORK
LEGEND'MAP # 12
~ - STATE PRINCIPAL ~ - COUNTY PRINCIPAL - CITY MINOR
ARTERIAL ARTERIAL ARTERIAL
~ - STATE MINOR ~ - COUNTY MINOR mmm. - CITY COLLECTOR
ARTERIAL ARTERIAL LOCAL ROADS AND
- STATE COLLECTOR m - COUNTY COLLECTOR ROADWAYS OUTSIDE CITY
sw 25
6LD
6LD
6LD
2LU 2LU
LN(£ IDA RD 4LD
2LU
3L 1-WAY
SLD
-GUI. FSTREA~
NEBST
1 -WAY
r - - 2LU 2LLJ
6LD
-- 2L 1-WAY
- - - ---J 4LU
6LD
N.T S.
6LD 2L 1-W^¥ ATLANTIC
r-I ATLANTIC AVE TRI-RAIL/ 1 ~ OCEAN
q ~- ] ,' , AMTRAK 2LU
L. _ 2LU 6LD
2LU
4LU
6LD
4LD
2LU
2LU
2LU
SLX
~LD
4LD
LOWSON BLVD
6LD
4LD
6LD
4LD
6LD
LINTON BLVD
6LD*
APRIL 2001
EXISTIN6 ROADWAY LANEA ;ES
MAP #13
LEGEND~
6LD - ROADWAY LANEAGE LU - LANES UNDIVIDED LX - LANES EXPRESSWAY
LD - LANES DIVIDED * - UNDER CONSTUCTION (LIMITED ACCESS)
N.T.S.
COCONUT LN
gITY I. IMIT~
.?.u LF'STREAM
L.-1
L-r
///
~TLANnC AW TRI- RAIL/
AIdTRAK
:
LOW,ON BLVO {S
1 ST
I ST
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
UNTON BLVO
SOURCES FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS AND PALM BEACH COUNTY ROAD MAINTENANCE INVENTORY LIST
PLANNING & ZONING
DEPARTMENT
APRIL 2001
FIJNL'TIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY
LEGEND, MAP # ! 4
~ - STATE PRINCIPAL ~ - COUNTY PRINCIPAL - CITY MINOR
ARTERIAL ARTERIAL ARTERIAL
~ - STATE MINOR ~ - COUNTY MINOR mmmmm, _ CITY COLLECTOR
ARTERIAL ARTERIAL LOCAL ROADS AND
m - STATE COLLECTOR ~ - COUNTY COLLECTOR ROADWAYS OUTSIDE CITY
~ - ~ / ~----~,~..~- ,,,,~-~liJ ATLANTIC
. .t ,
............. j .. BOLTER ~ '
HOUR DIRECT~ ~ILY T~IC
SOURCE WEST PALM B~CH URB~ STUDY AR~ TRAFFIC COUNT PROG~M. ~TA IS SH~N FOR INFOR~TION
PURPOSES ONLY ON ~AT[ R~S
EXISTIN~ ~ ~ A~gA~ AVErAgE OAIgY
~ p TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
~ LE~ENO, ~AP
' 14141-C - ~LY ~C ~D LOS
ON COU~ · C~ R~S (P) -
~D S~
APRIL 2001 ~ - ~LY ~C ~D LOS
ON ~A~ R~S 1996 P~ S~ON COUNT
LOW,ON BL~
SOURCE WEST PALM B~CH URBAN STUDY AR~ T~FFIC COUNT PROGRAM
--, EXISTIN~ /! 995/PEAK SEASON PM PEAK HOUR
LEGENg: MAP ~16
APRIL 2001 1517-C - P~ S~N PM P~ * S~RGE. C~ OF DEL~Y B~H iii D~R~N~ ~ ~ING DEF~LT
HOUR P~ DIRE~ON 1995 P~ ~ON COU~ K ~D D F~TO~ ~OM ~T
~C ~D L~ ,e A~E OF COU~ NO~H ~D ~H ~ ~U~
SW 23 AV~
N.T.S.
CITY LIMIt'S
NES~T
///
PALM TRAN
SATELLITE
FACILITY 4~
NE1 ST
1 ST
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
LOWSON BLVO (S 10 ST)
I
LIN*TON BLVO
¢ITY I.,IMITS
(-N-RIDE -
LOT
APRIL 2001
SOURCE PALM TRAN. PAL~ BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
LEGEND,
INTERMODAL FAC/L/TIES
MAP #17
~- ROUTE 24
~- ROUTE 2
~.- ROUTE 26
~- ROUTE TR7
*mm- ROUTE l s
~- ROUTE 25
---- - ROUTE 5
O - EXISTING FACILITY
SW 23
N.T.S.
LOWSON IlL'VD
LAKE IDA RD
AMTRAK
~ SOL,TH
GOVT CENTER
LINTON RLVD
-COMMERCIAL
AREA
GULFSTR.EN~
1.
NE 8 ST
1 ST
//I
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
APRIL 2001
MA$OR TRIP PRODIJ£ERS/ATTRA£TOR5
MAP #18
SW 23 AVE
N.T.S
COCONUT LN
L
~I~TLIMIT$
///
LAKE IDA RD
r" -iATLANTIC AVE:
LOWSON BLVD
LINTON BLVD
TRI-RAIL/
AMTRAK
1 ST
1 Si'
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
~ITYLIMITS
SOURCE PALM BEACH COUN'~' COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
APRIL 2001
HI./RRI£ANE EVA£UATiON ROUTES
MAP #19
LEGEND, ~ - EVACUATION ROUTE
~ ~01 ~ OPERATIN~ ~ONDITION5
~ PRIOR TO PRO~RAMMED IMPROVEMENT5
I
~, MAP
* - PROJECTED TO
~u,t ~oo~ ~OL --- ~t .~ HOUR STUDIO
--- St --- - 2t ONr-W~Y --- NOV SHOWN ,N ~O~S **- ,U.ROW~em ,NCLUDEO
--- SL --- ~L COU.~ UODrt ,N ~O~S .~
SW 23
N.T.S.
CiTY
c D
r
ATLANTIC
e·
TRI-RAIL/
AMTRAK
LOWSON BLVO (S 10 ~
**
LINTON BLVD
F
GULFSTREAM
NESST
1 ST
Jl
/11
~IT~ IJMIT$
APRIL 2001
SOURCE METROPOUTAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION OF PALM BE. ACH COUNTY, WPBUSA 2015 PLAN UPDATE
LEGENd, ~- IOL
~- 6L
~- 4L
~- 2L
2015 EOST FEASIBLE PLAN
MAP #2 !
2L ONE-WAY :'k _ PROJECTED TO MEET NOTE. LOS IS SHOWN FOR
NOT SHOWN ON 2015 ='k~k PEAK HOUR STANDARD OVER-CAPACITY LINKS ON
COST FEASIBLE PLAN - INCONSISTENT WITH EXHIBIT 16 FOR COMPARISON
EXISTING LANES
L-30 CANAL
i
LAKE IDA ROAD
i..... ............. ~ ....... J
ATLANTIC
LOWSON BOULEVARD
LINTON BOULEVARD
L-.~8 CANAL
PALM BEACH COUNTY
CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH
Sw
BOULEVARD
CITY OF
BOCA RA TON
STREAM
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
· ' TOWN OF
'~ ' HIGHLAND
POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNIT5
4ttAP
MILE
I
AGGREGATE PARCELS OF LAND, WHICH ARE VACANT OR UNDERDEVELOPED, 5 ACRES
J m OR GREATER IN SIZE, AND HAVE A F.L.U.M. DESIGNATION OF LOW DENSITY, MEDIUM DENSITY,
GRAPHIC SCALE TRANSITIONAL, MIXED USE, OR RURAL RESIDENTIAL.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA LEGEND:
G PLANNING ~ C~ UM~
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I0 NUMBER. (ULTIMATE CITY BOUNDARY)
APRIL 2001
CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION
TO:
THRU:
FROM
SUBJECT:
DAVID T. HARDEN
CITY MANAGE~~ ~
PAUL DORLING ( J
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND'ZONING_ /~
DAN MARFINO, PRINCIPAL PLANNEI~L~~
MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 FIRST READIN~ AND TRANSMITTAL
OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-3 (01-3)
BACKGROUND
The City Commission initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment 01-3 on August 21,
2001. This amendment represents the third amendment for the year 2001. Pursuant to
Florida Statute 163.3187(1)(j) this amendment is exempt from the twice a year
Comprehensive Plan amendment limit imposed by Florida Statute. This amendment will
include creation of a new Public Schools Facilities Element, which will include a definition
section and related map series, and revisions to the existing Capital Improvement
Element to include the School Districts adopted Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION
The Planning and Zoning Board held its public hearing regarding the amendment on
September 24, 2001. There was no public comment concerning the proposed
amendment. After discussion, the Board unanimously (5-0) recommended the City
Commission approve the amendment on first reading and transmit Comprehensive Plan
Amendment 01-3 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By motion, approve Comprehensive Plan Amendment 01-3 on first reading and transmit
the amendment to the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
Attachments:
. Comprehensive Plan 01-3
S:~LongRange\Comp~,mend 01-3\01-3 cc~nittal.doc
ORDINANCE NO. 52-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-3 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING
AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT", FLORIDA
STATUTES SECTIONS 163.3161 THROUGH 163.3243, INCLUSWE;
ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"
ENTITLED "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-3" AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING A
SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach exercised the authority granted pursuant to the
provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161 through 163.3243, inclusive, known as the
"Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 163.3187(1)0) this amendment is exempt from the
twice a year Comprehensive Plan amendment limit imposed by Florida Statute. This amendment
will include creation of a new Public Schools Facilities Element, which will include a definition
section and related map series, and revisions to the existing Capital Improvement Element to
include the School Districts adopted Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan; and
WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 82-89, the City Commission adopted the document
entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, did prepare an
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-3; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, following due
public notice, held a public hearing on September 24, 2001, in accordance with the requirements
of the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and
WHEREAS, at~er the above referenced public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Board, as
Local Planning Agency, recommended to the City Commission that the proposed Comprehensive
Plan Amendment 2001-3 be transmitted; and
WHEREAS, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-3 was submitted to and
reviewed by the City Commission; and
WHEREAS, following due public notice, the first of two required public hearings on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-3 was held by the City Commission on October 2, 2001, at
which time it was authorized to be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs for
required review; and
WHEREAS, Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-3 was found to be in compliance by
the Florida Department of Community Affairs and no ORC (Objections, Recommendations &
Comments) Report was issued; and
WHEREAS, following due public notice, the second of two required public hearings on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-3 was held on December 4, 2001, in accordance with
statutory requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, hereby declares
its intent to exercise the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections
163.3161 through 163.3243, inclusive, known as the "Local Govemment Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act".
Section 2. That in implementation of its declared intent as set forth in Section 1 of this
ordinance, there is hereby adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-
3", which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3. That the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida" is
hereby amended pursuant to the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2001-3".
Section 4. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof,
any paragraph, sentence, or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other
than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be, and the same
are hereby repealed.
Section 6. That this ordinance shall become effective upon the date a final order is issued
by the Department of Community Affairs finding the amendment in compliance in accordance
2 ORD. NO. 52-01
with Chapter 163.3184, F.S.; or the date a final order is issued by the Administration Commission
finding the amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F.S.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the
day of ,2001.
ATTEST
MAYOR
City Clerk
First Reading
Second Reading
3 ORD. NO. 52-01
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
Pacle
PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT
Creation of Element
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
1 Creation of Objective A-8
2 Modification of Policy A-3.7 by adding subsection (d).
2 Revision of Table CI-GOP-1 (Level of Service Standards)
3 Addition of Table SD-ClP (School District of Palm Beach County
Six Year Capital Improvement Schedule)
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT
1. The following is the creation of the Public Schools Facilities Element. The new
element, through a coordinated county-wide planning effort (County, Palm
County School District, and local governments) ensure that school capacity is
available at the time of impact of residential development. The element also
includes nine (9) new maps, a definition section, and three (3) appendices.
See Support Document #1 (Proposed Public Schools Facilities Element)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
2. Creation of Objective A-8
Comment: The proposed objective A-8 establishes a level of service for school
concurrency, incorporates school concurrency into the development review process, and
.requires that the level of service for public schools be met prior to issuance of
development permits.
Change:
OBJECTIVE A-8
The School District of Palm Beach County shall maintain minimum level of service
standards for public school facilities, as defined in the Public School Facilities Element
and in accordance with the "Palm Beach County Interlocal Aqreement with Municipalities
of Palm Beach County and The School District of Palm Beach County To Establish
Public School Concurrency". In the case of public school facilities, the issuance of
Development Orders, Development Permits or development approvals shall be based
upon the School District of Palm Beach County's ability to maintain the minimum level of
service standards as established in Policy ^-1.1, Public School Facilities Element.
(1)
Policy A-8.1: For public school facilities, the applicant for a Development Order or
Development Permit which includes any residential component shall provide a
determination of capacity by the School District of Palm Beach County that the proposed
development will meet the public school facilities level of service. A determination by the
School District is not required for existing single family legal lots of record, in accordance
with the Public School Facilities Policy A-1.8, Public School Facilities Element.
Policy A-8.2: In accordance with Public Schools Facilities Element Policy A-1.1, prior to
issuance of a Development Order/Permit, the School District of Palm Beach County shall
determine that the level of service for public school facilities can be achieved and
maintained. The necessary public school facilities shall be considered to be in place
when sufficient capacity exists in the concurrency service area (CSA) in which the
proposed development is located, or an immediately adjacent CSA.
Policy A-8.3: The School District of Palm Beach County Six Year Capital Improvement
Schedule (TABLE SD-CIP) is adopted as a supplement to the City of Delray Beach's
"Five Year Capital Improvements Schedule".
3. Modification of Policy A-3.7 (d)
Comment: The proposed modification Policy A-3.7 adds subsection (d), which defines
the use of the term "concurrent" with respect to school concurrency.
Change: Modification
Policy A-3.7 (d) The improvement in the case of public school facilities, construction
appropriations are specified within the first three years of the most recently approved
School District of Palm Beach County Six Year Capital Improvement Schedule, as
reflected in Table SD-CIP of this element.
4. Location:Pg. Cl-23, Table CI-GOP-1 (Level of Service Standards)
See Support Document #2 (Existing Table CI-GOP-1)
Change: REVISION
,See Support Document #3 (Proposed Table CI-GOP-1)
Comment: The proposed change creates the level service standard
concurrency.
for school
(2)
5. Creation of Table SD-CIP (School District of Palm Beach County Six Year
Capital Improvement Schedule)
Comment: The proposed change incorporates the School Districts Six Year Capital
Improvement Schedule in order to set forth a financially feasible public school capital
facilities plan.
Change: Addition
See Support Document ~ (School District of Palm Beach County Six Year Capital
Improvement Schedule)
S:\LongRange\Comp~Amend 01-3\01-3 Amendment.doc
(3)
SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 1
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-3
PROPOSED
PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT
PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
1. Overview ....................................................................................................... PS-1
2. Five Year Work Plan and FY 2000 Capital Budget ....................................... PS-2
3. Six Year Capital Improvement Schedule ....................................................... PS-2
B
SERVICE AREAS - SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA (CSA)
1. CSA Map ....................................................................................................... PS-3
2. Criteria to Establish Concurrency Areas ....................................................... PS-3
3. CSA Tables ................................................................................................... PS-3
Co
SCHOOL
RANGE PLANNING
DISTRICT Of PALM BEACH COUNTY DISTRICT-WIDE LONG
1. Enrollment ....................................................................................................
2. Ancillary Plants .............................................................................................
3. School Attendance Zones ............................................................................
4. District-wide Programs- Special Alternative, and Supplemental Programs..
5. Charter Schools ...........................................................................................
6. Population District wide - Projected Enrollment ...........................................
7. Population Determination .............................................................................
8. Population Based School Surpluses and Deficiencies .................................
9. Facility Demand ...........................................................................................
PS-4
PS-5
PS-5
PS-5
PS-6
PS-6
PS-7
PS-9
PS-9
LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
1. Enrollment Distribution .................................................................................. PS-17
2. Schools 35 Years Old or Older ...................................................................... PS-18
3. School Facility Utilization - Level of Service Standards ................................. PS-18
4. School Capacity Availability .......................................................................... PS-20
5. Development Rights ...................................................................................... PS-20
6. Public Infrastructure and Collocation ............................................................ PS-21
E. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
1. Reference to the Capital Improvement Element Amendments ..................... PS-21
F. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
1. Reference Executed Interlocal Agreement ................................................... PS-21
DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................... PS-22
CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS ....................... PS-23
GOALS OBJECTIVES & POLICIES ....................................................................... PS-30
APPENDIX A - CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA TABLES
APPENDIX B ENROLLMENT CAPACITY & SHORTFALL TABLE
APPENDIX C - SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ZONE MAPS
PS 1.1
PS 2.1
PS 3.1
PS 3.2
PS 3.3 and
PS 3.4
LIST OF MAPS
The Concurrency Service Areas (CSA).
Existing location of public school facilities by type and existing
location of ancillary plants. - School Facility Locations
Future conditions map depicting the planned and confirmed sites of
public school facilities by type and ancillary plants by year for the
five-year planning period - Planned Additional Capacity (Confirmed
Sites)
Future conditions map depicting the general location of planned
schools facilities without confirmed sites and ancillary plants by
year for the five-year planning period - Planned Additional Capacity
(Unconfirmed Sites)
Future conditions maps depicting the general location of planned
school facilities for the end of the long range planning period
based on projected Additional Facility Demand.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT
OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH
A. INTRODUCTION
1. Overview.
The Palm Beach County, the School District of Palm Beach County, and 26 participating
local governments within the school district have chosen to implement public school
concurrency, requiring each local government to adopt consistent comprehensive plan
amendments. The amendments include the following:
The proposed Public Schools Facilities Element and the accompanying data and
analysis to meet the minimum criteria for the Element set forth in Rule 9J-5.025,
F.^.C., for the purpose of imposing school concurrency. It is intended to assure
coordination among the County, local governments, and the School District so that
school capacity at the adopted level of service standard is available at the time of
the impacts of development.
The Capital Improvement Element to incorporate a financially feasible capital
improvement plan for school concurrency, setting forth a six-year financially feasible
public school capital facilities program that demonstrates that the adopted levels of
service will be achieved and maintained.
The Comprehensive Plan Map Series to incorporate nine new maps depicting the
proposed Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) and other information required by the
rule.
These amendments are proposed for the Special Amendment 2001-3 (01-3). The
proposed Plan amendments for school concurrency are submitted along with an
executed Interlocal Agreement which satisfy the requirements of ss.163.3177(6)(h)1.
and 2., F.S., and ss.163.3180(13)(g),F.S., establishing processes for intergovernmental
coordination and collaborative planning among the School District, the County and the
26 participating municipalities.
The Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) and related comprehensive plan
amendments to establish public school concurrency are based upon the following data
and analysis pursuant to requirements of Rule 9J-5.005(2), F.^.C. and Rule 9J-
PS- I
5.025(2), F.A.C. The principal source of data and analysis is provided by the School
District of Palm Beach County in its adopted FY2001-FY2005 Five-Year Capital
Facilities Plan and FY 2001 Capital Budget, June, 2000. (CIE Table SD-CIP )
School District of Palm Beach County FY 2001-2005 Five-Year Plan and FY
2001 Capital Budget (Five-Year Plan).
The School Distdct facilities and capital requirements are presented in the adopted
FY2001-2005 (Five-Year Plan) and FY 2001 Capital Budget pursuant to s. 235.185
Florida Statutes, and the Educational Plant Survey. The Five-Year Plan describes the
status of the existing facilities, economics, and enrollment trends of the School District.
Each planning zone depicts its area's schools grouped by school type. Special Schools
with district-wide boundaries are grouped in Planning Zone 19. Additionally, the Five-
Year Plan presents school facility planning, considering the District's facilities goals,
capital requirements and funding mechanisms. The Five-Year Plan is organized to
present facilities information by high school planning zones for the purpose of
determining enrollment, capacity calculations, and educational program considerations
with evaluations of each facility's issues. Further, the Five-Year Plan provides
descriptions of the School District's budgeted projects. Revenue sources are also
discussed in the document along with alternative funding options. The Five-Year Plan
details each school facility's existing enrollment, the existing School Student Capacity
(FISH), and existing level of service (LOS) (% of utilization) within the high school
planning zones. Demographic information and enrollment projections are provided in
the Five-Year Plan.
3. Six Year Capital Improvement Schedule.
In order to provide compatible financial feasibility between the School District's Five-
Year Plan and the City of Delray Beach's required 5-Year Capital Improvement
Program, the School District's Five-Year Plan was extended to project revenues and
expenditures for a sixth year in the initial planning period. This information in total
has been added to the Capital Improvement Element of the City of Delray Beach's
Comprehensive Plan as: Table SD-ClP - School District of Palm Beach Six Year
Capital Improvement Schedule,
B. SERVICE AREAS - SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS(CSA)
For the purposes of measuring school concurrency on a less than district-wide basis,
twenty-one (21) Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) are being established in the School
District. The Intedocal Agreement directs that school attendance boundary adjustments
will be made for each school facility within a CSA to achieve the adopted LOS,
maximize school utilization, and establish travel times which do not exceed those set in
School Board Policy 7.13 for elementary and secondary schools.
PS - 2
1. Concurrency Service Area Map.
Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.025(4)(c), F.A.C., school concurrency service areas which are
less than district-wide must be depicted in the Comprehensive Plan. One of the
proposed maps in the Comprehensive Plan Map PS1.1, depicts the School
Concurrency Service Areas (CSA).
2. Criteria to establish Concurrency Service Areas.
The physical boundaries of the CSAs are delineated in the Implementation Section of
the Public School Facilities Element. For school concurrency service areas on a less
than district-wide basis, Palm Beach County is divided into twenty-one CSAs. The CSA
boundaries are described as bounded by section lines, major traffic-ways, natural
barriers and county boundaries. In addition, each CSA boundary was delineated
considering school locations, student transporting times, and to a lesser extent the
future land uses in the area. Consistent with s.163.3180(13)(c)2.,F.S., changes to the
CS^ boundaries shall be made only by amendment to the Public Schools Facilities
Element and are exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan amendments.
3. Concurrency Service Area Tables.
Based on the District's Five-Year Plan, the School District Planning Zones (high school
planning zones) data was used to create the CSA tables to present capacity, projected
enrollment, and utilization of the School District's facilities as required by Rule 9J-
5.025(2)(e) and Rule 9J-5.025(3)(c)7, F.A.C., for School Concurrency (See Appendix
A). The twenty-one CSAs have been developed consistent with s.163.3180(13)(c)2.,
F.S., required when the school concurrency service area is less than district-wide. The
CS^ tables have also been added as an appendix to the current Five-Year Plan. Under
the title of each table there is a reference to the School District Planning Zones where
the information was taken from and where detailed data is depicted.
Each CSA Table presents a specific CSA with its school facilities by type. As depicted
on the CSA Tables, the data requirements for portions of Rule 9J-5.025(2) (b), (c) and
(e), F.A.C., for the Public Schools Facilities Element are specifically addressed in each
CSA.
The CSA Tables provide the following school data by CSA and by school type
consistent with Rule 9J-5.025, F.A.C.:
The projected enrollment, capacity and projected level of service (% of
utilization) by year for the six year planning period.
(2)
The targeted actual LOS of 110% is achieved countywide in school year
2004-05.
PS - 3
(4)
(5)
(6)
The total projected school facility surpluses and deficiencies by year for
the six-year planning period based on projected enrollment by school type.
Enrollments, capacities and utilizations are shown adjusted per year as
the school improvements are anticipated to be completed.
The means by which the enrollment is stabilized and the adopted LOS is
attained through redistribution of students by boundary adjustments or
school construction or other capital improvements.
The school facilities planned for each CSA to accommodate projected
enrollment at the Tiered Level of Service (LOS) standard each year
projected for the first four-year period, then at the adopted LOS for the fifth
year of the initial planning period. School utilization does not exceed the
targeted 110% LOS in the sixth year.
The notes 'provided at the bottom of each CSA Table page describe the
provision of school facilities by type to be newly opened or modernized to
provide for future enrollment or enrollment relief for existing schools within
the CSA and schools in adjoining CSAs. Further analysis of the adequacy
of the level of service conditions is located within the School District's
FY2001-FY2005 (Five-Year Plan) and FY 2001 Capital Budget, June
2000. As indicated in the CSA Tables, the program and boundary
adjustments necessary to effectively utilize capacity may occur at any
time.
C. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY DISTRICT-WIDE LONG
RANGE PLANNING
.1. Enrollment.
In the 2000-01 school year, the School District serves 151,000 K-12 students through
regular and special programs and partnerships in a variety of facilities. There are more
than 147,000 students served in schools with boundaries and/or magnet programs at
regular schools measured in the Concurrency Service Area Tables in Appendix A.
The Table Enrollment Capacity & Shortfall/Surplus for 04/05, 09/10, &19/20 (Appendix
B), provides information regarding total projected enrollments and corresponding school
facilities needed for each CSA to accommodate the adopted level of service standard
for the end of the initial five year period and long range planning period of ten and
twenty years. The tables list the total enrollments, capacity, and shortfall or surplus by
school type District-wide. Population shifts which may result in adjustments to school
attendance zones and CSA total enrollments, require the School District to determine
the number of school facilities needed district-wide. Based on the total long range
PS - 4
projected enrollment for each type of school, the table shows the projected facilities
needed district-wide for elementary, middle and high schools.
The CSA Tables also reflect the 2,147 students enrolled in alternative and special
schools. Students are assigned to these schools without regard to attendance zones. In
addition, the CSA Tables show 728 students participating in programs not based in
School Districts Facilities.
2. Additional Capacity and Ancillary Plants.
For the end of the initial planning period, the required Map Series PS 3.1 and PS 3.2
depict the locations of proposed schools with confirmed sites and the planned schools
without confirmed sites. Additionally, Map 3.2 shows ancillary facilities with sites to be
determined. The long range facility demand maps - PS 3.3 and PS 3.4 show general
future demand for schools based on projected population. The facilities required to meet
these future demands are anticipated but not yet budgeted.
Based on the School District's Five-Year Plan, no ancillary plants are planned to be
converted to school facilities for school concurrency purposes. Similarly, the Five-Year
Plan shows the School District has no plans to convert any school facility to an ancillary
plant. Additionally, the School District is not planning an expansion of any ancillary
administration or support facilities with the exception of a bus depot. Currently,
educational centers known as Full Service Centers operate out of two ancillary plants.
These centers house a variety of public school and non-profit programs that serve
preschool children through adults. These programs include Head Start, drop-out
prevention and Second Chance Programs, adult education, child care and wellness
centers, etc. Ancillary facilities are also utilized for School District Area offices, which
support educational activities and are not utilized for the measurement of school
concurrency.
3. SchoolA~endance Zones.
Existing district-wide school attendance zones for each school facility are provided by
school type on School Attendance Zone Maps (Appendix C).
4. District-wide Programs - Special, Alternative, and Supplemental Programs.
The School District of Palm Beach County offers a range of special, alternative, and
supplemental educational programs on a district-wide basis. In the Five-Year Plan, the
planning zone entitled "Planning Zone 19: Special, Alternative, and Supplemental
Programs" analyzes a variety of programs offered in the special and alternative school
setting. These programs operate at the discretion of the School Board in a range of
different facilities with district-wide boundaries. The number of students served, where
they are housed, and integration with the regular programs, are all choices driven by
District policies and budgets. Planning for these programs is an essential component to
PS - 5
long range planning for school buildings. Special programs affect school enrollment,
capacity, utilization and building design.
The alternative and special schools serve more than 2,100 students. Students are
assigned to these programs without regard to attendance zones. The enrollment in the
programs is projected to be stable for the 5-year planning period.
Facilities Plans and recommendations to accommodate these programs during the next
five years are to be completed for the FY 2002-2006 (Five-Year Plan). They will identify
where programs are or will be located, how many students will be served at each
facility, and other special facilities needs.
5. Charter Schools
Charter schools are considered public schools that operate under a special charter with
a school district. ^ cha~ter school sets its own attendance criteria and selects its own
facilities. The State provides funding through a separate formula for its operating and
capital budgets directly to the charter schools; therefore, charter schools are not
included in the School District's Capital Plan. For the purposes of school concurrency,
charter schools cannot be used to determine capacity for residential development. In
the 2000-01 school year, 9 charter schools serve 709 students. New applications for
additional charter schools have been received for school year 2001-02 that may serve
up to a total of 2,800 students.
6. Population District-wide -Projected Enrollment.
The projected district-wide school enrollment is based upon the demographic and
economic profiles developed by the County which establish the basis for projecting
capacity requirements through the initial five year planning period and the end of the
long range planning period, consistent with Rule 9J-5.025(2)(b), F.A.C. The School
District has experienced an annual enrollment growth of 5% since 1985. This is an
average annual increase of approximately 5,000 students each school year. This
annual growth rate will be moderated over the next five years.
Figures 2 through 6 on pages 1-3 and 1-4 of the School District's FY2001-FY2005
(Five-Year Plan) and FY 2001 Capital Budget, June 2000, present enrollment
projections based upon demographic and economic profiles. Over the next 5 years, the
School District's K-12 enrollment is projected to increase by 10,000 +/- students to
nearly 160,000. The total enrollment figures have closely tracked the general
population trends. Generally, the average annual enrollment increases in the middle
and high school age range and is expected to continue for the next three years.
Palm Beach County's geographic area is approximately 2,023 square miles. It is
comprised of 1,739.4 square miles of unincorporated areas and thirty-seven
municipalities within 283.6 square miles. The county has a total population of more than
PS - 6
1.025 million in 1998, with an unincorporated population of more than 465,000 and an
incorporated population of nearly 560,000. Since 1940, the County has nearly doubled
in population every 20 years, with the 2000 population estimated at 1,062,400. Creating
the greatest impact on the School District, of the 1.062 million persons who reside in
Palm Beach County, 28% of the population is under the age of 24. The County's
population continues to have an annual growth rate of 2.24% exceeding the state's at
2.09%. (Source: Florida Statistical Abstract, 1996 University of Florida Population
Studies, 1999. "POPULATION GROWTH PROJECTION AND DISTRIBUTION TO
2015" and Profile and 1998 and 1999, Palm Beach County, Planning Zoning and
Building Department, Planning Division)
7. Population Determination.
The Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) at the University of Florida,
develops population estimates and projections for each of the municipalities within Palm
Beach County. These are the official estimates and projections widely used for planning
purposes by both the public and private sectors. However, local planning studies
generally require smaller area estimates and projections (less than a jurisdiction level)
for the evaluation of specific impacts on a local target area. To this end, the PBC
Planning Division, over the past five years, has developed and refined a population
disaggregation model to distribute BEBR's medium range population projections and
annual estimates to smaller geographies, namely, the Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ)
used by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). By modeling projected
population in local areas, the Planning Division provides insight into the direction and
location of growth within the County.
The Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) projects that the County
population will grow by approximately 22,000 persons per year during the planning
period.
,The County's Planning Division has distributed this information across Traffic Analysis
Zones (TAZ) and has aggregated results for sub-areas which are described below and
depicted on the Disaggregation Sub-Area Map1:
North
Central
South
Glades
area north of 45th Street,
area between 45th and Boynton Beach Boulevard
area south of Boynton Beach Boulevard
area west of 20 mile bend
PS - 7
Projection Distribution Based on Adc =ted Land Use Plans: North, Central, South and Glades
1990 1996 2005 !015
~.reas pop %of total pop % of total pop %of total ~op %of total
North 145,657 17% 173,289 18% 231,841 20% 300,698 22%
3entral 388,031 45% 438,214 45% 511,212 44% 589,533 43%
South 293,265 34% 333,037 34% 384,896 33% 434,249 32%
3lades 36,565 4% 37,253 4% 42,351 4% ¢9,320 4%
total Pop 863,518 981,793 1,170,300 !,373,800
The disaggregation model indicates that, given the development pattern currently
anticipated on adopted Future Land Use maps, population increases will occur
throughout the County with almost 40% of total projected growth locating in the central
portion of the County. Population growth in the northern portion of the county will
increase in the coming years and exceed growth anticipated in south County, though
the southern portion of the County is still expected to have significant population
increase, primarily in the West Boynton area. The Glades is expected to have limited
population increases.
Another aggregation evaluation performed was an east to west split. Four areas were
established depicted on the Disaggregation Sub-Area Map 2:
2.
3.
4.
Area east of 1-95
Area between 1-95 and the Turnpike
Area west of the Turnpike
the Glades.
Due to the convergence of 1-95 and the Turnpike north of PGA, the FEC railroad and
the Loxahatchee Slough are used as respective boundaries in place of 1-95 and the
Turnpike.
Population Distribution Based on Adopted Land Use Plans: East to West
! 990 1996 2005 2015
% o! % of total % of total % of total
Areas Pop total Pop Pop Pop
East of 1-95 296,400 34% 318,754 32% 344,439 29% 370,580 27%
3etween 1-95& Turnpike 397,781 46% 456,034 46% 541,255 46% 631,849 46%
Nest of Turnpike 132,771 15% 169,753 17% 242,255 21% 322,051 23%
3lades 36,565 4% 37,253 4% 42,351 4% 49,320 4%
~rotal Population 363,518 981,793 1,170,300 1,373,800
The model predicts that 46% of future population growth will occur between the
Turnpike and 1-95. Only 15% of the County's projected population increase will occur
PS - 8
east of 1-95. Furthermore, 37% of the projected population increase will occur west of
the Turnpike.
8. Population Based School Surpluses and Deficiencies.
The Five-Year Plan provides short term projections (1-5 years) and long term district-
wide enrollment projections by school type (1-20 years). Short term projections rely
upon the utilization of the Cohort Survival Method. This Model uses enrollment data by
grade and by facility, factoring in growth and rolling students forward through the
schools by grade. Long term projections are based on the Population Dissagregation
Model developed by Palm Beach County Planning. This model establishes the bases
for projecting capacity requirements through the initial five year planning period and the
end of the long range planning period, consistent with Rule 9J-5.025(2)(b) F.^.C. The
results are cross-verified and compared for variations. (See Enrollment Projections
Outline, pg. PS-16)
9. Facility Demand.
The projected additional facility demand for long range planning of public school
facilities by CSA and school type is depicted on required future conditions Maps PS 3.3
and 3.4. Using existing and projected population, the existing and projected school
facility district-wide surpluses and deficiencies by year for the five-year planning period
and for the end of the long range planning period of the County, are presented in
Appendix B. These surpluses and deficiencies are listed by CS^, representing
projected seats needed (capacity demand).
PS- 9
/
II
ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS OUTLINE:
USING COHORT SURVIVAL AND GIS
FOR SHORT & LONG TERM PLANNING
DATA SOURCES:
STUDENT DATA BY AREA, ADDRESS, & FACILITY
POPULATION DATA AND PROJECTIONS BY AREA
(olher ,','~ta: blrl~s. ¢emficales of :~,~upancy. devek3pment projects, pmgi-am ¢ttanges. other)
PROJECTION MODELS'
~COHORT SURVlVAL MODEL) I AREA PROJECTION MODEL )
{SHORT ~RM - 1 to 5 yearn)/ ~ {LONG ~RM - 1 to 20 yearn) ~
Usu e~ol~t da~ by gmS. by ~
ladh~, fa~or= ~ g~ a~ mils data by area generated by P~ ofPBC & BEBR w~ ~
studen~ fo~ard ~ gmd~ GIS to ~t~rate ~ud~t ~a~ ~ ~ a~flable ~
Check results tot ~tmn. j
¢~pare to other source~ anal~e/
ENROLLMENT~ PROJECTIONS
DEVELOPED USING ACCEPTED METHODOLOGY & BEST AVAILABLE SOURCES.
.~NCOPJ~OR~TES VAR[P. TION BY FACILITY. AND GEOGRAPHIC REG!ON
D. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
The School District's FY2001-FY2005 (Five-Year Plan) and FY 2001 Capital Budget,
June 2000, provides an analysis of the adequacy of the existing level of service for each
school facility within each high school planning zone, describing the physical condition
of the facilities in order to develop appropriate level of service standards based on
physical conditions and programs pursuant to Rule 9J-5.025(2)(d) F.A.C. The Five-Year
Plan provides the existing enrollment, the existing School Student Capacity (FISH), and
existing utilization for each school facility consistent with Rule 9J-5.025(2)(a), F.A.C.
The Five-Year Plan's high school planning zones provide an analysis of the schools
within each zone and specific project recommendations. Appendix A of the Five-Year
Plan (CSA Tables) indicates which high school planning zone has information about the
individual schools contained in each CSA.
1. Enrollment Distribution.
The public school enrollment in Palm Beach County indicates a range of facility
utilization from under capacity to significantly over capacity as measured against the
Florida Department of Education Inventory of School Housing (FISH). The 2000-2001
Five-Year Plan shows existing school utilization ranging from a Iow of 43% (C.D.
Eisenhower Elementary) to a high of 204% (Acreage Pines Elementary) of capacity for
elementary schools; middle schools range from 78 (Lakeshore Middle) to 159%
(Lantana Middle); and high schools from 70% (Jupiter High) to 167 % (Atlantic High) of
capacity.
The general distribution of student enrollment across Palm Beach County shows north
County middle and elementary schools at (or moderately over) capacity, and the high
schools with generally lower enrollments. These schools are within the Concurrency
Service Areas (CSA) 1-6. There is a moderate growth rate in north County schools;
however, the Abacoa area is expected to add significant student growth to this area of
the County in the next five years. Recently proposed developments for the former
MacArthur Foundation lands in northern County, are being proposed with lower
densities which traditionally generate a lower number of students. Enrollment in the
eastern-central portion of the County (within CSAs 8,9,11,12,14 and 15)is stable, but
many schools are over capacity with moderate growth in enrollment expected to
continue. Schools in the central-western portion of the County are operating above
capacity and enrollment is expected to grow rapidly as development is anticipated within
CSAs 10, and16. The south-central portion of the County is significantly over capacity,
with all school types being impacted within CSAs 17,18,19 and 20. This area's
enrollment is expected to continue to grow, particularly on the western portion of these
CSAs which are expected to grow rapidly with family oriented homes. The southern
section of the County shows school enrollment moderately above capacity, but
expected to stabilize within CSA 21. The School District considers the western portion
(Glades) of the County to have stable enrollment.
PS - 17
2. Schools 35 Years Old or Older.
The School District performed an educational adequacy and physical condition analysis
on 42 schools that are 35 years old or older. The study provides a basis for a
determination of priority for capital improvements through FY2005 for modernization of
facilities. The older facilities include 5 high schools, 5 middle schools, 26 elementary
schools, 4 special alternative schools, and 2 full service centers. The schools'
assessments are described in executive summaries prepared by Vanderweil Facility
Advisors, and Song and Assoc., et. al. Copy of these documents are held at the City of
Delray Beach's Planning Division and will be part of the Support Documents of the
PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT.
3. School Facility Utilization - Level of Service Standards.
School Board Policy 7.13 addresses the School Plant Capacity Level of Service (LOS).
It requires the School District to maintain equitable levels of service for the District's
schools. The School Board policy describes a range of enrollment per FISH capacity
(LOS) from underutilized, 90% or less, to critically overcapacity (151% or more). The
policy sets the District's goal for school utilization to between 90% and 110% of each
school's FISH capacity, not to exceed 120%. The following policies in the PUBLIC
SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT determine the LOS to be used for school
concurrency, addressing how to implement the target LOS and the tiered LOS, and how
to conduct School Capacity studies to make LOS determinations for individual schools
that may go beyond the adopted LOS.
a. Policy A-1.1: Target Level of Service Standards
As a requirement for school concurrency, the Interlocal Agreement establishes
the countywide goal for LOS as 110% of FISH capacity. The LOS standard is the
school's utilization which is defined as the enrollment as a percentage of school
student capacity based upon the Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH). The
Interlocal agreement also establishes that no school can operate in excess of
120% utilization, once the target LOS standard is achieved.
1. School Capacity Study
The Intedocal Agreement requires a School Capacity Study (SCS) if a school in
the first student count of the second semester exceeds 108% of FISH capacity.
The Technical Advisory Group (TAG)is required to conduct a School Capacity
Study (SCS) to determine if the specific school can operate at a LOS exceeding
110%, though no school shall be permitted to operate at a LOS greater than
120% of FISH capacity beginning in the 2004-2005 school year. The study must
consider the demographics within the CSA; student population trends; core
facility capacity; real estate trends and teacher student ratios.
PS - 18
2. Technical Advisory Group
The Interlocal Agreement establishes an independent and representative group
appointed by the County, School District, and municipalities to function as a
resource to the County, School District, and municipalities. The TAG shall
conduct studies and make recommendations regarding the five year and long
range work program, facility utilization, and CSA adjustments to enhance joint
planning and ensure that the School District's Work Plan and Capital Facilities
Program provide a financially feasible plan to add enough capacity to provide
permanent student stations for the projected growth.
In summary, this policy establishes the district-wide target level of service
standard of 110% utilization. Or 120% subject to the results of a SCS undertaken
by the School District to determine if a school can operate in excess of 110%.
Finally, no school shall be permitted to operate at a LOS greater than 120% of
FISH capacity beginning in the 2004-2005 school year, when the target LOS of
110% must have been reached county-wide.
b. New Policy A-1.2: (120% Implementation)
This policy lays out the procedure that needs to be followed when a SCS
determines that a school will exceed the 120% utilization, once the target LOS
standard of 110% is in place. To correct the failure the School District would have
to make program adjustments, attendance boundary adjustments or
modifications to the Capital Facilities Program. After those adjustments are made
and the SCS determines that the school exceeding the 110% standard can
operate within the guidelines established by the school district's adjustments,
then the Comprehensive Plan needs to be amended to reflect the new LOS
standard for the school type in the corresponding CSA.
c. Policy A-1.3: (School Capacity Study Criteria)
This policy sets up the criteria to conduct a SCS and the minimum data and
analysis to be considered when conducting the study. The policy also directs the
TAG to notify the local government where the SCS is going to be conducted.
d. Policy A-1.4: (Tiered Level of Service)
Section 163.3180(12)(b)3, F.S., provides the option of tiered LOS standards for
schools to allow time to achieve an adequate and desirable LOS. The Interlocal
Agreement establishes tiered levels of service for each school type based on
School Board Policy 7.13, which shall be in place until such time the School
District has achieved 110% LOS.
PS- 19
In order to achieve a district-wide LOS of 110%, overcapacity will be addressed
through the financially feasible school construction program identified in the Five-
Year Plan and the CIE Table SD-ClP. The CSA Tables show a need for a tiered
LOS for the school years until 2004-2005. Policy A-1.4 and Table 1.1-1 of the
PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT, establish such a tiered LOS as an
interim measure by facility type within each CSA, where enrollment is projected
to exceed the 110% long term standard. To determine the appropriate interim
LOS, utilization by facility type in each CSA was projected. In those CSAs where
utilization exceeded the 110% standard, adjoining CSAs were examined to
determine if the needed capacity was available consistent with the requirements
of s.163.3180(c)(3), F.S. The resulting analysis yielded the appropriate interim
LOS by facility type for each CSA and the schedule by which the 110% utilization
LOS will be achieved.
Additionally, in order to establish a consistent maximum limit for individual
schools exceeding the adopted LOS standard during the period in which the
interim LOS are in effect, a new Table 1.1-2, entitled Maximum Utilization Table,
was created along with additional language under Policy A-1.4. The additional
language states that each individual school exceeding the adopted LOS
standards cannot exceed the utilization standards for that school type as
indicated in the new table. The table shows the standards for the maximum
utilization of capacity by facility type per CS^ for each of the next six school
years. To determine these standards, the maximum percentages of utilization per
year and school type depicted in the CS^ tables were analyzed. The resulting
analysis yielded the appropriate maximum percentage of utilization by facility
type per CSA.
4. School Capacity Availability - Policy A-1.5.
The School District's Six Year Capital Improvement Schedule, depicted on CIE Table
SD-CIP, assures that funding for construction of planned school facilities is available in
the first three years of the adopted Plan. The City of Delray Beach may not deny a
development permit authorizing residential development where adequate school
facilities will be in place or under actual construction within three years. Within the initial
six year planning period, the CS^ Tables show assured construction within the first
three years. This is consistent with s.163.3180(13)(e),F.S., to provide a dependable
school capacity availability when evaluating LOS determination.
5. Development Rights - Policy A-1.6.
The impact of a single family home on an existing lot of record is considered to have
minimal impact on schools and is therefore exempted from LOS restrictions.
PS - 20
6. Public Infrastructure and Collocation.
The analysis of the problems and opportunities consistent with Rule 9J-5.025(2)(f),
F.A.C., suggests that the School District is both a service (infrastructure) provider with
a level of service determination, and a developer, requiring infrastructure to meet
concurrency to proceed with construction of schools. The City of Delray Beach will
assist the School District in the determination of site locations proximate to required
infrastructure in an effort to reduce costs. Additionally, the City of Delray Beach will work
with the School District in identifying funding for the provision of supporting
infrastructure, such as water, sewer, roads, drainage, sidewalks and bus stops for
existing and proposed public school facilities.
To assist in containing costs, the City of Delray Beach shall allow schools as a
permitted use in all urban residential land use categories and encourage the collocation
of schools proximate to the residential development which they will serve. The City of
Delray Beach adopted on September 5, 1999, an amendment to the Future Land Use
Element to comply with the requirements of s.163.3177(6)(a), F.S., calling for the
provision of opportunities to collocate schools with facilities, such as libraries, parks and
community centers.
Map PS 3.2 depicts the budgeted planned additional school capacity which do not have
confirmed sites. The CS^ Tables show that these projected schools will bring significant
relief to over-utilized schools within the next five years. Implementation of the Interlocal
Agreement to establish school concurrency will provide the opportunity to coordinate
school siting with the City of Delray Beach's development review process in a timely
manner, and will allow for a multi-agency, expedited review of all potential school
locations.
Due to the growth in the County's Rural and Exurban Tiers, the central western
communities offer few potential school sites collocated with community facilities.
Infrastructure is limited in these areas consistent with their more rural development
pattern.
E. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Data and analysis in support of the financial feasibility of the school concurrency
program is described in the corresponding amendments to the Capital Improvements
Element.
F. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
The Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) has been amended to address the
requirements for coordination with the School District and municipalities for decision -
making on school siting. The ICE addresses the requirements of Rule 9J-5.015, F.^.C.,
PS - 21
for coordination of Plans with the School Board and other units of local government.
The executed Interlocal Agreement which is consistent with s.163.3177(6)(h)l.and 2.,
F.S., and s.163.3180(13)(g),F.S., establishes processes for intergovernmental
coordination and collaborative planning among the School District, the City of Delray
Beach, and Palm Beach County.
The following definitions are proposed to be added to the Public Schools Facilities
Element to comply with the minimum criteria for the Public School Facilities Element for
school concurrency and are consistent with Rule 9J-5.025(1), F.A.C.
DEFINITIONS
ANCILLARY PLANT - Facilities to support the educational program, such as
warehouses, vehicle maintenance, garages, and administrative buildings.
CORE FACILITY - Those facilities which include the media center, cafeteria,
toilet facilities, and circulation space of an educational plant.
DISTRICT SCHOOLS All District owned regular, elementary, middle, high
schools, magnet and special educational facilities.
EDUCATIONAL PLANT SURVEY - A study of present educational and ancillary
plants and the determination of future needs to provide an appropriate
educational program and services for each student.
FLORIDA INVENTORY OF SCHOOL HOUSES (FISH) - The report of
permanent school capacity. The FISH capacity is the number of students that
may be housed in a facility (school) at any given time based on using a
percentage of the number of existing satisfactory student stations and a
designated size for each program according to s. 235.15, Florida Statutes. In
Palm Beach County, permanent capacity does not include the use of relocatable
classrooms (portables).
PUBLIC SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA OR "CONCURRENCY
SERVICE AREA" - The specific geographic area adopted by local governments,
within a school district, in which school concurrency is applied and determined
when concurrency is applied on a less than district-wide basis.
PS - 22
II. IMPLEMENTATION SECTION
Concurrency Service Area (CSA) Boundary Description
The Palm Beach County School District is divided into twenty one CSAs for school
concurrency. The Palm Beach County School CSA boundaries are described in the
following pages as bounded by Section lines, major traffic-ways, natural barriers and
county boundaries consistent with s.163.3180(13)(c)2.,F.S. Changes to the CSA
boundaries shall be made by plan amendment and exempt from the limitation on the
frequency of plan amendments.
CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTIONS DESCRIBED AS BOUNDED BY:
CSA #f
NORTH
SOUTH
EAST
WEST
-The Martin / Palm Beach County Border
-Donald Ross Rd
-The Atlantic Ocean
-Florida's Turnpike
CSA #2
NORTH -The Martin / Palm Beach County Border
SOUTH -Donald Ross Rd and the South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 41-42-
21, 41-42-20, 41-42-19, 41-41-24, and 41-41-23, then Southwest along the
centerline of the C-18 canal to the Bee Line Hwy
EAST -Florida's Turnpike
WEST -Bee Line Hwy
#3
NORTH -Donald Ross Rd
SOUTH- The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 42-43-10, 42-43-09, 42-43-
08, 42-43-07, and 42-42-12, East of Military Trl, then South along Military Trl
to Northlake Blvd, then West along Northlake Blvd to Florida's Turnpike
EAST - The Atlantic Ocean
WEST- FIorida'sTurnpike
PS - 23
~4
NORTH -
SOUTH -
EAST -
WEST -
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 41-42-21, 41-42-20, 41-42-
19, 41-41-24, and 41-41-23, then Southwest along the C-18 Canal to the Bee
Line Hwy, then Northwest along the Bee Line Hwy until the intersection of
Bee Line Hwy and the West Section Line of Section 41-41-18
Northlake Blvd West to Grapeview Blvd, North along Grapeview Blvd to the
South Section Line of Section (using T-R-S) 42-41-08, then West along the
South Section Line of Sections 42-41-08 and 42-41-07
Florida's Turnpike
The West Section Line of (using T-R-S) 41-41-18 South of the Bee Line Hwy,
and the West Section Lines of Sections 41-41-19, 41-41-30, 41-41-31,42-41-
06, and 42-41-07
#5
NORTH -
SOUTH -
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 42-43-10, 42-43-09, 42-43-
08, 42-43-07, and 42-42-12 West to Military Trl
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 42-43-34, 42-43-33, 42-43-
32, 42-43-31, and 42-42-36 West to Military Trl
EAST - The Atlantic Ocean
WEST - Military Trl
#6
NORTH -
.SOUTH -
EAST -
WEST -
Northlake Blvd
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 42-42-36 West of Military
Trl, 42-42-35, 42-42-34, 42-42-33, 42-42-32, and 42-42-31
Military Trl
The West Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 42-42-18, 42-42-19, 42-42-
30, and 42-42-31
#8
NORTH -
SOUTH -
EAST -
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 42-43-34, 42-43-33, 42-43-
32, 42-43-31, and 42-42-36 West to Military Trl
The North Line of the South Half of Sections (using TRS) 43-43-23, 43-43-22,
43-43-21,43-43-20, 43-43-19, and 43-42-24 East of Military Trl
The Atlantic Ocean
WEST - Military Trl
PS - 24
#g
NORTH -
SOUTH -
EAST -
WEST -
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 42-42-36 (West of Military
Trl), 42-42-35, 42-42-34, 42-42-33, 42-42-32, and 42-42-31
The North Section Line of Sections (using TRS) 43-42-24 West of Military Trl,
43-42-23, 43-42-22, 43-42-21, 43-42-20, and 43-42-19
Military Trl
The West Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 43-42-06, 43-42-07, 43-42-
18, and 43-42-19 North of the South Line of the North Half
#10
NORTH -
SOUTH -
EAST -
WEST -
Northlake Blvd West to Grapeview Blvd, North along Grapeview Blvd, then
West along the South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 42-41-08, and
42-41-07, then South along the West Section Line of 42-41-18 until
intersecting with the Canal generally delimiting the Northern extent of The
Acreage and the Southern extent of the J. W. Corbett preserve, West along
the centerline of the Canal through the center of Sections 42-40-13, 42-40-14,
42-40-15, 42-40-17, and 42-40-18, then North along the East Section Line of
Section 42-39-13 to the North Line of the South Half of Section 42-39-13,
then West along the North Line of the South Half of Section 42-39-13 to the
West Section Line of Section 42-39-13
Southern Blvd West of 441, West to the West Section Line of Section (using
T-R-S) 43-40-33
The East Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 43-41-01, 43-41-12, 43-41-
13, 43-41-24, 43-41-25, and 43-41-36 South to Southern Blvd
The L-8 Canal South of the South Section Line of Section (using T-R-S) 42-
40-31 and West of the West Section Line of Section 43-40-08, the West
Section Line of Section 43-40-08 South of the L-8 Canal, the West Section
Line of Sections 43-40-16, 43-40-21, 43-40-28, and 43-40-33 South to
Southern Blvd
#11
NORTH - The North Line of the South Half of Sections (using TRS) 43-43-23, 43-43-22,
43-43-21,43-43-20, 43-43-19, and 43-42-24 East of Military Trl
SOUTH - The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 44-43-02, 44-43-03, 44-43-
04, 44-43-05, 44-43-06, and 44-42-01 East of Military Trl
EAST - The Atlantic Ocean
PS - 25
WEST - Military Trl
#12
NORTH -
SOUTH -
EAST -
WEST -
The North Section Line of Sections (using TRS) 43-42-24 West of Military Trl,
43-42-23, 43-42-22, 43-42-21, 43-42-20, and 43-42-19
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 44-42-01 West of Military
Trl, 44-42-02, 44-42-03, 44-42-04, 44-42-05, and 44-42-06
Military Trl
The West Section Line of Section (using T-R-S) 43-42-19 South of the North
Line of the South Half, and State Rd 7
#14
NORTH -
SOUTH -
EAST -
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 44-43-02, 44-43-03, 44-43-
04, 44-43-05, 44-43-06, and 44-42-01 East of Military Trl
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 44-43-26, 44-43-27, 44-43-
28, 44-43-29, 44-43-30, and 44-42-25 East of Military Trl
The Atlantic Ocean
WEST - Military Trl
#15
NORTH - The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 44-42-01 West of Military
Trl, 44-42-02, 44-42-03, 44-42-04, 44-42-05, and 44-42-06
SOUTH - The L-14 Canal
EAST - Military Trl
WEST - State Rd 7
#t6
NORTH -
SOUTH-
EAST -
WEST -
Southern Blvd West of 441, West to the West Section Line of Section (using
T-R-S) 43-40-33
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 44-41-25, 44-41-26, 44-41-
27, 44-41-28, 44-41-29, and 44-41-30 East of the L-40 Canal
U.S. Hwy 441 / State Rd 7
The L-40 Canal and the West Section Line of Section 43-40-33 South of
Southern Blvd
PS - 26
#17
NORTH - The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 44-43-26, 44-43-27, 44-43-
28, 44-43-2g, 44-43-30, 44-42-25, 44-42-26, and 44-42-27 East of Jog Rd
SOUTH - The Boynton Oanal
EAST - The Atlantic Ocean
WEST - Jog Rd
#18
NORTH -
SOUTH -
EAST -
WEST -
The L-14 Canal West to the Florida Turnpike, then North along the Turnpike
to the South Section Line of Section (using T-R-S) 44-41-29, then West along
the South SeCtion Line of Sections 44-42-30, 44-41-25, 44-41-26, 44-41-27,
44-41-28, 44-41-29 and 44-41-30 East of the L-40 Canal
The Boynton Canal
Jog Rd
The L-40 Canal
#19
NORTH -
SOUTH -
EAST -
WEST -
The Boynton Canal
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 46-43-03, 46-43-04, 46-43-
05, 46-43-06, 46-42-01, 46-42-02, 46-42-03, 46-42-04, 46-42-05, 46-42-06,
State Rd 7 South to the South Section Line of Section 46-41-01, West along
the South Section Line of Section 46-41-01 extended to the L-40 Canal
The Atlantic Ocean
The L-40 Canal
#20
NORTH -
SOUTH -
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 46-43-03, 46-43-04, 46-43-
05, 46-43-06, 46-42-01, 46-42-02, 46-42-03, 46-42-04, 46-42-05, 46-42-06,
State Rd 7 South to the South Section Line of Section 46-41-01, West along
the South Section Line of Section 46-41-01 extended to the L-40 Canal
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 46-43-28, 46-43-29, 46-43-
30, 46-42-25, 46-42-26, 46-42-27, 46-42-28, 46-42-29, 46-42-30, 46-41-25,
and 46-42-26 East of the L-40 Canal, the portion of the line formed by these
Section Lines West of 1-95 generally approximates the C-15 Canal
PS - 27
EAST - The Atlantic Ocean
WEST - The L-40 Canal
#21
NORTH -
SOUTH -
EAST -
WEST -
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 46-43-28, 46-43-29, 46-43-
30, 46-42-25, 46-42-26, 46-42-27, 46-42-28, 46-42-29, 46-42-30, 46-41-25,
and 46-42-26 East of the L-40 Canal, the portion of the line formed by these
Section Lines West of 1-95 generally approximates the C-15 Canal
The Palm Beach / Broward County Border
The Atlantic Ocean
The L-40 and L-36 Canals
#22
NORTH -
SOUTH -
EAST -
WEST -
The Martin / Palm Beach County Border
The Palm Beach / Broward County Border
From the Martin / Palm Beach County Border, the Bee Line Hwy South to the
West Section Line (using T-R-S) of 41-41-18, the West Section Lines of
Sections 41-41-18, 41-41-19, 41-41-30, 41-41-31, 42-41-06, 42-41-07, and
42-41-18 until intersecting with the Canal generally delimiting the Northern
extent of The Acreage and the Southern extent of the J. W. Corbett preserve,
West along the centerline of the Canal through the center of Sections 42-40-
13, 42-40-14, 42-40-15, 42-40-17, and 42-40-18, then North along the East
Section Line of Section 42-39-13 to the North Line of the South Half of
Section 42-39-13, then West along the North Line of the South Half of Section
42-39-13 to the West Section Line of Section 42-39-13, then South along The
West Section Line of South Half of Section 42-39-13, The West Section Line
of Sections 42-39-24, 42-39-25, and 42-39-36 North of the L-8 Canal, the L-8
Canal South to the West Section Line of Section 43-40-08, then South along
The West Section Lines of Sections 43-40-08 South of the L-8 Canal, 43-40-
16, 43-40-21,443-40-28, and 43-40-33, then South along the L-40 Canal and
the L-36 Canal to the Palm Beach / Broward County Border.
The Shoreline of Lake Okeechobee South to the South Section Line of
Section (using T-R-S) 41-37-22, East along the South Section Line of
Sections 43-37-22, and 41-37-23, then South along the East Section Line of
Sections 41-37-26, 41-37-35, 42-37-02, 42-37-11, 42-37-14, 42-37-23, 42-37-
26, and 42-37-35, then West along the South Section Line of Section 42-37-
35 to the East Section Line of Section 43-37-02, then South along the East
Section Line of Sections 43-37-02, 43-37-11, 43-37-14, 43-37-23, 43-37-26,
and 43-37-35, then in a Southerly direction to the East Section Line of Section
44-37-02, then South along the East Section Line of Sections 44-37-02, 44-
PS - 28
37-11, 44-37-14, and 44-37-23 to the L-16 Canal, then West along the L-16
Canal and the L-21 Canals, also referenced as the Bolles Canal, to the West
Section Line of Section 44-35-34, then North along the West Section Line of
Sections 44-35-34, 44-35-27, 44-35-22, 44-35-15, 44-35-10, 44-35-03, 43-35-
34, and 43-35-27 to the Shoreline of Lake Okeechobee, then Westerly along
the Shoreline of Lake Okeechobee to the Palm Beach / Hendry County
Border, South along the Palm Beach / Hendry County Border to the Palm
Beach / Broward County Border
~r23
NORTH -
SOUTH -
EAST -
WEST -
The South Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 43-37-22 East of Lake
Okeechobee, and 41-37-23
The L-16 and L-21 Canals, also referenced as the Bolles Canal
The East Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 41-37-26, 41-37-35, 42-37-
02, 42-37-11, 42-37-14, 42-37-23, 42-37-26, and 42-37-35, then West along
the South Section Line of Section 42-37-35 to the East Section Line of
Section 43-37-02, then South along the East Section Lines of Sections 43-37-
02, 43-37-11, 43-37-14, 43-37-23, 43-37-26, and 43-37-35, then in a
Southerly direction to the East Section Line of Section 44-37-02, then South
along the East Section Line of Sections 44-37-02, 44-37-11, 44-37-14, and
44-37-23 to the L-16 Canal
The West Section Line of Sections (using T-R-S) 43-35-27 South of the
Shoreline of Lake Okeechobee, 43-35-34, 44-35-03, 44-35-10, 44-35-15, 44-
35-22, 44-35-27, and 44-35-34 South to the L-21 or Bolles Canal
PS - 29
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL AREA "A"
PUBLIC SCHOOL CONCURRENCY: IT IS A GOAL OF THE CITY
OF DELRA Y BEACH TO PROVIDE FOR FUTURE AVAILABILITY
OF PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES CONSISTENT WITH THE
ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD. THIS GOAL
SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED RECOGNIZING THE
CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT
TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM SYSTEM OF FREE PUBLIC
SCHOOLS ON A COUNTYWIDE BASIS.
Objective A-1
Level Of Service
To ensure that the capacity of schools is sufficient to support student growth at the
adopted level of service standard for each year of the five-year planning period and
through the long term planning period.
Policy A-1.1: The LOS standard is the school's utilization which is defined as the
enrollment as a percentage of school student capacity based upon the Florida Inventory
of School Houses (FISH). The level of service (LOS) standard shall be established for
all schools of each type within the School District as 110 percent utilization, measured
as the average for all schools of each type within each Concurrency Service Area. No
individual school shall be allowed to operate in excess of 110% utilization, unless the
school is the subject of a School Capacity Study (SCS) undertaken by the School
District, working with the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) which determines that the
school can operate in excess of 110% utilization. The SCS shall be required if a school
in the first student count of the second semester reaches 108 % or higher capacity. As a
result of an SCS, an individual school may operate at up to 120% utilization.
~ If, as a result of a School Capacity Study (SCS), a determination is made
,that a school will exceed 120% utilization or cannot operate in excess of 110%
utilization, then the School District shall correct the failure of that school to be operating
within the adopted LOS through 1) program adjustments 2) attendance boundary
adjustments or 3) modifications to the Capital Facilities Program to add additional
capacity. If, as a result of the SCS a determination is made that the school will exceed
110% and can operate within adopted guidelines, the identified school may operate at
up to 120% utilization. If as a result of one or more School Capacity Studies that
demonstrate that the schools of a particular type can operate at a higher standard than
the 110% utilization standard of the CSA, the Comprehensive Plan will be amended to
reflect the new LOS for that school type in that CSA.
Policy A-I.:~; The School Capacity Study (SCS) shall determine if the growth rate
within an area, causing the enrollment to exceed 110 percent of capacity, is temporary
or reflects an ongoing trend affecting the LOS for the 5 year planning period. The study
shall include data which shows the extent of the exceedance attributable to both
PS - 30
existing and new development. Notification shall be provided to the local government
within whose jurisdiction the study takes place. At a minimum, the study shall consider:
1. Demographics in the school's Concurrency Service Area (CS^);
2. Student population trends;
3. Real estate trends (e.g. development and redevelopment);
4. Teacher/student ratios; and
5. Core facility capacity.
Policy A-1.4: The adopted LOS standard shall become applicable to the entire County
at the beginning of the 2004-05 school year, by which time the School District has
achieved the countywide adopted level of service for all schools of each school type. In
the interim, Table 1.1-1 establishes the tiered level of service standards for each CSA
by school type. Individual schools of each type may exceed the Tiered LOS standards
during the period in which Tiered LOS are in effect. Each individual school exceeding
the Tiered LOS during that time shall not be allowed to exceed the utilization standards
for that school type as shown in the Maximum Utilization Table of this element (Table
1.1-2).
Table 1.t-1
Standards for Tiered Level of Service
CSA Facility Type 2000-01 2001-02 12002-03 12003-04 12004-05 112°°5'°6
1 Elementary 120 110
Middle 130 125 I 110
H~gh 110
2 Elementary 110
Middle 130 130 110
High 115 115 115 1110
I
3 Elementary 110
Middle 130 130 110
High 115 115 115 1110
I
4 Elementary 115 110
Middle 130 130 110
High 115 115 115 1110
I
5 Elementary 110
Middle 130 130 115 110
High 135 135 130 130 I 110
I
PS - 31
6 Elementary ;110
Middle 130 130 120 110
High 120 ~ 120 120 110
8 Elementary 110
Middle 130 130 125 115 110
High 125 125 120 115 110
9 Elementary 110
Middle 125 125 125 115 I 110
I
High 120 120 120 110
10 Elementary 135 120 110
Middle 125 125 125 125 1110
High 120 120 120 110
t t Elementary 135 135 110
Middle 125 125 125 110
High 125 ,125 125 110
'112 Elementary 140 130 120 115 110
Middle 135 135 135 115 110
High 135 135 135 120 110
14 Elementary 125 ~125 115 110
M~ddle 135 135 135 115 110
High 135 130 130 115 110
15 Elementary 135 135 115 115 110
Middle 125 125 125 110
H~gh 135 135 135 110
16 Elementary 130 115 110
Middle 120 120 120 115 110
High 135 135 135 120 110
17 Elementary 130 125 110
Middle 135 130 130 110
High 145 120 120 110
PS - 32
t8 Elementary 120 115 115 115 110
Middle 120 120 120 120 110
High 145 120 120 115 110
19 Elementary 110
Middle 110
20 Elementary 110
Middle 125 1110
High 165 130 1130 1130 [110
21 Elementary 115 110
Middle 125 125 125 110
High 125 125 125 115 1110
!
22 Elementary 110
Middle 110
High 110
23 Elementary 110
M~ddle 110
H~gh 110
County Alternative 110
wide Schools
Source: Based on data depicted in the School District of Palm Beach County FY2001-FY2005 Five-Year Plan and FY 2001
Capital Budget, June 2000, and the actual count of students in the second semester of the 2000-01 school year.
Table 1.1-2
MAXIMUM UTILIZATION TABLE:
Standards for Utilization of Capacity
CSA FacilitTType 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
1 Elementary 165 125 125 120 120 120
Middle 130 125 120 120 120 120
H~gh 120 120 120 120 120 120
2 Elementary 120 120 120 120 120 120
M~ddle 130 130 120 120 120 120
PS - 33
High 120 120 120 120 120 120
3 Elementary 120 120 120 120 120 120
Middle 130 130 120 120 120 120
High 120 120 120 120 ,120 120
4 Elementary 155 150 120 120 120 120
Middle 135 135 120 120 120 120
High 135 135 130 130 120 120
,5 Elementary 155 150 120 120 120 120
Middle 140 135 120 120 120 120
High 135 135 130 130 120 120
Elementary 155 145 120 120 120 120
6
Middle 135 135 120 120 :120 120
High 120 120 120 120 120 120
8 Elementary 160 160 160 145 120 120
Middle 135 135 135 130 120 120
High 120 120 120 120 120 120
~9 Elementary 120 120 120 120 120 120
Middle 135 135 135 130 120 120
High 120 120 120 120 120 120
10 Elementary 205 165 120 120 120 120
Middle 135 135 135 135 120 120
High 120 120 120 120 120 120
11 Elementary 1245 245 120 120 120 120
Middle 125 125 120 120 120 120
High 125 125 120 120 120 120
'12 Elementary 150 150 125 120 120 120
Middle 145 145 145 125 120 120
High 135 135 135 120 120 120
14 Elementary 140 135 135 130 120 120
Middle 145 145 145 125 120 120
PS - 34
High !165 120 120 120 120 120
15 Elementary 180 180 165 140 120 120
Middle 130 130 125 120 120 120
High 135 135 135 120 120 120
16 Elementary 200 120 120 120 120 120
Middle 140 125 125 125 120 120
High 135 135 135 120 120 120
17 Elementary 205 205 125 125 120 120
Middle 175 175 175 120 120 120
High 145 120 120 120 120 120
18 Elementary 13G 120 120 120 120 120
M~ddle 130 130 130 130 120 120
High 160 120 120 120 120 120
19 Elementary 120 120 120 120 120 120
M~ddle 120 120 120 120 120 120
High 170 135 135 135 120 120
20 Elementary 140 140 140 135 120 120
Middle 130 120 120 120 120 120
H~gh 170 145 145 130 120 120
21 Elementary 165 145 120 120 120 120
Middle 155 155 155 120 120 120
High 145 145 145 120 120 20
22 Elementary 120 120 120 120 120 120
Middle 120 120 120 120 120 120
High 120 120 120 120 120 120
23 Elementary 300 120 120 120 120 120
Middle 120 120 120 120 120 120
High 120 120 120 120 120 120
County Alternative 120 120 120 120 120 120
Wide Schools
Source: Based on data depicted m the School District of Palm Beach County FY2001-FY2005 F~ve-Year Plan and FY 2001 Capital
Budget, June 2000
PS - 35
Policy A-1.5: Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) shall be established on a less than
district-wide basis, as depicted on Map PS 1.1 and described in the Concurrency
Service Area Boundary Descriptions in the Implementation Section of this element.
1. The criteria for Concurrency Service Areas shall be:
Palm Beach County is divided into twenty-one CSAs. Each CSA boundary shall
be delineated considering the following criteria and shall be consistent with
provisions in the Interlocal Agreement:
a. School locations, student transporting times, and future land uses in
the area.
b. Section lines, major traffic-ways, natural barriers and county
boundaries.
2. Each CSA shall demonstrate that:
a. Adopted level of service standards will be achieved and maintained for
each year of the five-year planning period; and
b. Utilization of school capacity is maximized to the greatest extent
possible, taking into account transportation costs, court approved
desegregation plans and other relevant factors.
3.Consistent with s.163.3180(13)(c)2.,F.S., changes to the CSA boundaries shall be
made only by amendment to the PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT and
shall be exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan amendments, Any
proposed change to CS^ boundaries shall require a demonstration by the School
District that the requirements of 2(a) and (b), above, are met.
Policy A-1.6: The City of Delray Beach shall consider as committed and existing the
public school capacity which is projected to be in place or under construction in the first
three years of the School District's most recently adopted Five-Year Plan, as reflected in
Table SD-CIP (Six Year Capital Improvement Schedule) of the Capital Improvement
Element of the City of Delray Beach's Comprehensive Plan), when analyzing the
availability of school capacity and making level of service compliance determinations.
Policy A-1.7: The City of Delray Beach shall amend Table SD-CIP (Six Year Capital
Improvement Schedule) of the Capital Improvement Element when committed facility
capacity is eliminated, deferred or delayed, to ensure consistency with the School
District Five-Year Plan.
PS - 36
Policy A-1.8: For purposes of urban infill and in recognition of the entitlement density
provisions of the City of Delray Beach's Future Land Use Element, the impact of a home
on an existing single family lot of record shall not be subject to school concurrency.
Policy A-1.9: The City of Delray Beach shall suspend or terminate its application of
School concurrency upon the occurrence and for the duration of the following
conditions:
1. School concurrency shall be suspended in all CSAs upon the occurrence and for
the duration of the following conditions:
The occurrence of an "Act of God"; or
The School Board does not adopt an update to its Capital Facilities Plan by
September15th of each year; or
The School D~strict's adopted update to its Capital Facilities Program Plan
does not add enough FISH capacity to meet projected growth in demand for
permanent student stations at the adopted level of service standard for each
CS^ and ensures that no school of any type exceeds the maximum utilization
standard in any CSA; or
The School District Capital Facilities Plan is determined to be financially
infeasible as determined by the State Department of Education, or as defined
by the issuance of a Notice of Intent to Find an Amendment to a Capital
Improvement Element not in compliance as not being financially feasible, by
the Department of Community Affairs; or by a court action or final
administrative action; or
If concurrency is suspended in one-third or more of the CS^s pursuant to
Policy A-1.9(2)(a) below.
'2. School Concurrency shall be suspended within a particular CS^ upon the
occurrence and for the duration for the following conditions:
· Where an individual school in a particular CSA is twelve or more months
behind the schedule set forth in the School District Capital Facilities Plan,
concurrency will be suspended within that CSA and the adjacent CSAs for
that type of school; or
· The School District does not maximize utilization of school capacity by
allowing a particular CSA or an individual school to exceed the adopted Level
of Service (LOS) standard; or
· Where the School Board materially amends the first 3 years of the Capital
Facilities Plan and that amendment causes the Level of Service to be
exceeded for that type of school within a CSA, concurrency will be suspended
within that CSA and the adjacent CSAs only for that type of school.
PS - 37
3. The County shall maintain records identifying all Concurrency Service Areas in
which the School District has notified the County that the application of concurrency
has been suspended.
Once suspended, for any of the above reasons, concurrency shall be reinstated
once the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) determines the condition that caused the
suspension has been remedied or the Level of Service for that year for the affected
CSAs have been achieved.
If a Program Evaluation Report recommends that concurrency be suspended
because the program is not working as planned, concurrency may be suspended
upon the concurrence of 33% of the PARTIES signatories of the "Palm Beach
County Interlocal Agreement with Municipalities of Palm Beach County and the
School District of Palm Beach County to establish Public School Concurrency".
6. Upon termination of the Interlocal Agreement the County shall initiate a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to terminate school concurrency.
Objective A-2: Facilities Requirements
To provide for mitigation alternatives which are financially feasible and will achieve and
maintain the adopted level of service standard in each year of the five-year planning
period.
~.GJ.[G.Y...~i:~: Mitigation shall be allowed for those development proposals that cannot
meet adopted level of service standard. Mitigation options shall include options listed
below for which the School District assumes the operational responsibility and which will
maintain the adopted level of service standards for each year of the five-year planning
period.
Donation of buildings for use as a primary or alternative learning facility;
and/or
Renovation of existing buildings for use as public school facilities; or
Construction of permanent student stations or core capacity.
The site plan for buildings being renovated pursuant to number 2 above, that are fifty
years of age or older, shall demonstrate that there are no adverse impacts on sites
listed in the National Register of Historic Places or otherwise designated in accordance
with appropriate State guidelines as locally significant historic or archaeological
resources.
Policy A-2.2: A development order shall be issued and mitigation measures shall not
be exacted when the adopted level of service standard cannot be met in a particular
concurrency service area, as applied to an application for a development order, if the
needed capacity for the particular CSA is available in one or more contiguous CSAs.
PS - 38
Objective A-3
Six-Year Capital Improvement Schedule
To ensure existing deficiencies and future needs are addressed consistent with the
adopted level of service standard.
Policy A-3.1: The City of Delray Beach, in coordination with the School District and
other local governments, shall annually amend Table SD-CIP of the Capital
Improvement Element (School District of Palm Beach County Six-Year Capital
Improvement Schedule), to maintain consistency with the School Board's adopted Five-
Year Plan and to maintain a financially feasible capital improvements program and
ensure that level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained in
each year of the five year planning period.
PS - 39
GOAL AREA "B"
SCHOOL FACILITY SITING AND DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATION: IT IS THE GOAL OF CITY OF DELRA¥
BEACH TO MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE JOINT PLANNING
PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES FOR COORDINATION OF
PUBLIC EDUCATION FACILITIES FOR PLANNING AND
DECISION-MAKING REGARDING POPULATION
PROJECTIONS, PUBLIC SCHOOL SITING, AND THE
DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC EDUCATION FACILITIES
CONCURRENT WITH RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND
OTHER SERVICES.
OBJECTIVE B-I School Facility Sitin.q
To establish a process of coordination and collaboration between the County, local
governments, and the School District in the planning and siting of public school facilities
in coordination with planned infrastructure and public facilities.
~ The City of Delray Beach shall coordinate and provide for expedited
review of development proposals with the School District during the development review
process to ensure integration of public school facilities with surrounding land uses and
the compatibility of uses with schools.
~ The proposed site shall be suitable or adaptable for development in
accordance with applicable water management standards, and shall not be in conflict
with the adopted or officially accepted plans of the South Florida Water Management
District, or any applicable Stormwater Utility or Drainage District.
~ The proposed location shall comply with the provisions of the Coastal
Zone Management Element of the Comprehensive Plan, if applicable to the site.
~ The City of Delray Beach shall encourage the location of schools
proximate to urban residential areas by:
· Assisting the School District in identifying funding and/or construction opportunities
(including developer participation or City of Delray Beach capital budget expenditures)
for sidewalks, traffic signalization, access, water, sewer, drainage and other
infrastructure improvements;
· Providing for the review for all school sites as indicated in Policy B-1.1 above; and,
· Allowing schools as a permitted use within all urban residential land use categories.
PS - 40
~.~lJg. Y..l~: The City of Delray Beach shall coordinate with the School District for the
collocation of public facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers with
schools, to the extent possible, as sites for these public facilities and schools are
chosen and development plans prepared.
OBJECTIVE B-2 Inter. qovernmental Coordination
To establish and maintain a cooperative relationship with the School District and
municipalities in coordinating land use planning with development of public school
facilities which are proximate to existing or proposed residential areas they will serve
and which serve as community focal points.
~gJ[g.~..~,~l. The City of Delray Beach shall abide by the "Palm Beach County Interlocal
Agreement with Municipalities of Palm Beach County and the School District of Palm
Beach County to establish Public School Concurrency", which was fully executed by the
parties involved and recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County
on January 25, 2001, consistent with ss.163.3177(6)(h)1.and 2. F.S. and 163.3180 F.S.
~.gJJ.g.,V.=~:~,~: The Technical Advisory Group (TAG) shall be established by the County,
participating local governments, and the School District. The five member TAG will be
comprised of a Certified Public Accountant, a General Contractor, a Demographer, a
Business Person, and a Planner, nominated by their respective associations as
indicated in the Interlocal Agreement to establish Public School Concurrency mentioned
in Policy B-2.1 above. The Technical Advisory Group shall review and make
recommendations including but not limited to the following:
1. The Capital Facilities Plan;
2. The Ten and Twenty Year work programs;
3. Schools that trigger a School Capacity Study;
4. Concurrency Service Areas boundaries;
5. School District Management Reports; and
6. Operation and effectiveness of the Concurrency Program;
7. Program Evaluation Reports.
~.9.J[g.Y..~z.~,,~ The City of Delray Beach shall provide the School District with annual
information needed to maintain school concurrency, including information required for
the School District to establish:
· School siting criteria;
· Level of service update and maintenance;
· Joint approval of the public school capital facilities program;
· Concurrency service area criteria and standards; and
· School utilization.
PS - 41
~9.JJ.r~._~,~ The City of Delray Beach shall provide the School District with its
Comprehensive Plan, along with the five-year land use and population projections, to
facilitate development of school enrollment projections and shall annually update this
information. The City of Delray Beach shall coordinate its Comprehensive Plan and the
Future Land Use Map with the School District's long range facilities maps (Maps PS 3.1
and PS 3.2), to ensure consistency and compatibility with the provisions of this Element.
~..QJJ.r~/._~ The City of Delray Beach shall advise the School District of a proposed
public school site's consistency with the City of Delray Beach's Comprehensive Plan
and land development regulations, including the availability of necessary public
infrastructure to support the development of the site.
~ The City of Delray Beach shall provide opportunity for the School District
to comment on comprehensive plan amendments, rezonings, and other land-use
decisions which may be projected to impact on the public schools facilities plan.
~=OJJ,r~L~..~,~.: The City of Delray Beach shall coordinate with local governments and the
School District on emergency preparedness issues which may include consideration of:
· Design and/or retrofit of public schools as emergency shelters;
· Enhancing public awareness of evacuation zones, shelter locations, and evacuation
routes;
· Designation of sites other than public schools as long term shelters, to allow schools
to resume normal operations following emergency events.
OB~IECTIVE C-3 Population Proiections
To establish a joint process of coordination and collaboration between the City of Delray
Beach, Palm Beach County and the School District in the planning and decision making
on population projections.
Policy C-3.1 The County shall convert the BEBR projections into both existing and new
residential units and disaggregate these units throughout incorporated and
unincorporated Palm Beach County into each CSA, using BEBR's annual estimates by
municipality, persons-per-household figures, historic growth rates and development
potential considering the adopted Future Land Use maps of all local government
Comprehensive Plans. These projections are shown in Exhibit E of the Interlocal
Agreement as "Projected Units Table" which shall be amended annually and provided to
the School District.
~ The City of Delray Beach commits working with the School District and
Palm Beach County to improve this methodology and enhance coordination with the
plans of the School District and local governments. Population and student enrollment
projections shall be revised annually to ensure that new residential development and
PS - 42
redevelopment information provided by the municipalities and the County as well as
changing demographic conditions are reflected in the updated projections. The revised
projections and the variables utilized in making the projections shall be reviewed by all
signatories through the Intergovernmental Plan Amendment Review Committee
(IPARC). Projections shall be especially revisited and refined with the results of the
2000 Census. The responsibilities of local governments and the School District on
population projections are described in Section VIII-B of the Interlocal Agreement.
S:\LongRange\Comp~,mend 01-3\PSFE Element.doc
PS - 43
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
APPENDIX A
= E m
'Inn
'de:~
'lp, rl
'llO,~ug
'd~
'llmUg
'lg~
'llmUg
,I
l 'll~Ug
---m_om
. og~._
__. .:_
~ E c
o.~
'lit. fl
'de~)
'llo~u3
'lRrl
'de~
'llO~U3
'lnfl
'd~}
'IlO Jut
'll~n
'de:3
'llO;U3
'lr~n
'de~3
'llOJU3
'IRN
'11c~uq
,,,
,<
0
0
-inn
'llO~U:l
'lllfl
'de~)
'1~
'1~
'deD
o
0
C 0 'r 0
c
c
0
N
le
0
o
0
'lAN
'lAN
'llO~U~
'1~
~ 'd~
o
'll~U~
-illn
~ 'd~
o
'llOJUq
'lllri
I
'llOJU~!
-iioJu:a
'llirl
''de:)
0
'll0Juq
t~
~o 'de~)
'JlCUU3
uJ
'JJOJU~J
LU
0 m
LU
,,'
U.I
l
A
E
0
t-'
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
APPENDIX B
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
APPENDIX C
~,I:~ARY SCHOOL
· OUNDARI~ 2000~0~1
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
6
SEE gEV #s & SHADING LEGEND
FOR ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES
P&RE GIS
N
MIDDLE SCHOOL
BOUNDARIES 2000t2001
~ 2 JUPITER
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PAlM BEACH COUNTY, FIX)RIDA
l&
P&RE GIS
N
BOUNDARIES 2000~2001
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
WESTERN AREA
P&RE GIS
M_~k~l~
N
SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-3
EXISTING
TABLE CI-GOP-1 (LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
TAB L E CI-GOP-f
CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
FACILITY STANDARDS
Sewer Treatment System
· Generation Inflow
· Plant Design Capacit~
160 gal per person per day.
21 mgd average / 30 mgd peak.
Water Treatment System
· Water Usage
· Storage
· Raw Water Pumping Capacity
· Water Treatment Capacity
· Water Pressure
195 gal per person per day.
15% of maximum flow + fire reserve at 1.5 mg + emergency reserve at 25% of
storage = 6.0 mg at buildout.
22.4 mgd.
28 mgd.
20 psi, minimum.
Solid Waste
· Generation Inflow
7.13 pounds per person per day.
Drainage
· SFWMD Standard
Retention of the first one inch of runoff or 2.5 inches of water storage times
the percentage of impervious areas, to protect water (~ualit~/.
Traffic
· Local Streets
· City Collectors and Arterials
· County Streets
· State Facilities
"C" under any condition.
"D" under any conditions, pursuant to Exhibit 1 and 2.
"D" under any conditions, per the adopted County level of service. Basis for
calculations are the County Traffic Performance Standards
"D" Under any conditions, pursuant to Exhibit 2
Open Space and Recreation
· Local Determination
· Facilities
Mini Park / Playground
Neighborhood Park
Community Park
Urban District Park
Regional Park
· Actiwties
Children Play Area
Baseball Field
Softball Field
Football / Soccer Field
Tennis Courts
Golf Course (18 hole)
Basketball Court
Shuffleboard Court
Handball / Racquetball Court
Swimming Pool (small)
Swimming Pool (Large)
Boatramps
Beachfront
Boating
Coastal Zone Levels of Service
3 acres per 1,000 residents.
1 per 2,500 residents, ¼ mile service area.
1 per 5,000 residents, ¼ to % mile service area.
1 per 25,000 residents, % to 3 mile service area.
1 per 50,000 residents, 30 to 40 minutes driving time.
1 per 100,000 residents, 30 to 60 minutes driving time, 250 + acres.
1 per 5,000 residents.
I per 5,000 residents.
I per 5,000 residents.
I per 15,000 residents.
I per 2,000 residents.
1 per 25,000 residents.
I per 5,000 residents
I per 2,000 residents.
1 per 10,000 residents.
1 per 2,000 residents
1 per 25,000 residents
I per 15,000 residents
25 linear feet per 1,000 residents.
% acre per 1,000 residents.
Shall be the same as elsewhere in the CiR.
CI - 23
SUPPORT DOCUMENT #3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-3
PROPOSED
TABLE CI-GOP-1 (LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
TAB L E CI-GOP-f
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
FACILITY STANDARDS
Sewer Treatment System
· Generation Inflow
· Plant Design Capacit~
160 gal per person per day.
21 mgd average / 30 mgd peak.
Water Treatment System
· Water Usage
· Storage
· Raw Water Pumping Capacity
· Water Treatment Capacity
· Water Pressure
195 gal per person per day.
15% of maximum flow + fire reserve at 1.5 mg + emergency reserve at 25% of
storage = 6.0 mg at buildout.
22.4 mgd.
28 mgd
20 psi, minimum.
Solid Waste
· Generation Inflow
7.13 pounds per person per day.
Drainage
· SFWMD Standard
Retention of the first one inch of runoff or 2.5 inches of water storage times
the percentage of impervious areas, to protect water ~luali~.
Traffic
· Local Streets
· City Collectors and Arterials
· County Streets
· State Facilities
"C" under any condition.
"D" under any conditions, pursuant to Exhibit 1 and 2.
AD" under any conditions, per the adopted County level of service.
calculations are the County Traffic Performance Standards.
"D" Under any conditions, pursuant to Exhibit 2.
Basis for
Open Space and Recreation
· Local Determination
· Facilities
Mini Park / Playground
Neighborhood Park
Community Park
Urban District Park
Regional Park
· Activities
Children Play Area
Baseball Field
Softball Field
Football / Soccer Field
Tennis Courts
Golf Course (18 hole)
Basketball Court
Shuffleboard Court
Handball / Racquetball Court
Swimming Pool (small)
Swimming Pool (Large)
Boatramps
Beachfront
Boating
3 acres per 1,000 residents
1 per 2,500 residents, ¼ mile service area.
1 per 5,000 residents, ¼ to % mile service area.
1 per 25,000 residents, % to 3 mile service area.
1 per 50,000 residents, 30 to 40 minutes driving time.
1 per 100,000 residents, 30 to 60 minutes driving time, 250 + acres
3er 5,000 residents.
3er 5,000 residents.
3er 5,000 residents.
3er 15,000 residents.
3er 2,000 residents.
3er 25,000 residents.
~er 5,000 residents.
3er 2,000 residents
3er 10,000 residents
3er 2,000 residents
~er 25,000 residents.
3er 15,000 residents.
25 linear feet per 1,000 residents.
acre per 1,000 residents.
Coastal Zone Levels of Service
Public School Levels of Service
Shall be the same as elsewhere in the City.
See Public Schools Facilities Element.
Cl - 23
SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 4
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 01-3
PROPOSED TABLE SD-ClP
(SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY-
SlX YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE)
c> 0
0 C~ 0 0
0 ~0 0 0
00
0 00
0 00
o o.o.
c~ o o
0 00
888~
00~
0~
0~
0 ~ ~-
0 0¢ ~
0 ~ ~
0 ~0
0 O~ ~0
0 t'~ ~
0
0 w~'
o
0 (~ O~
0 0 (0
00~
00~
0
o
00~
00~0
_.D
0 0 n n ,,~
000
O~ 00
O~ 00
000
000
I~- 0 0
~ 00
000
000
~000
O~ 00
888
~ 0 0
~88 ~
E~°,,>-
o
0 o
~0 0
0
o
o
o.
~ ~ooo o
00000
000~0
0~000