Loading...
07-12-94 Special/Workshop . DElRA~ BEACH bed AII·America City CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA - CITY COMMISSION '1111' SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING - JULY 12, 1994 - 6:00 P.M. ~ COMMISSION CHAMBERS The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or áctivity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Ranäolph, 243-7127 at least 24 hours prior to the program or acti- vity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such person will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. The City neither provides nor prepares such record. SPECIAL MEETING/PUBLIC HEARING ~AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO RAMBLIN' ROSE LICENSE AGREEMENT: Consider an amendment to the license agreement with Ramblin' Rose Riverboat, Inc. The amendment proposes the parties split the cost of a six inch sewer line for the purpose of permitting the Licensee to discharge waste while docked at the park. ~'f!bc,.J/¡pp.,IIad;; Alison MacGregor Harty City Clerk WORKSHOP AGENDA /1. Florida Main Street Program. (30 Minutes) 2. Palm Beach County Impact Fee Review Committee's recommen- dation to the Board of County Commissioners on proposed new impact fees. (30-45 minutes) )3. Parking In Lieu fees Account. (15 minutes) /4. Lighting for Pompey Park outdoor basketball courts. (20 min) vis. Commission Comments. . . . , fJv) [ITY DF DELAAY BEA[H ~... CITY AnORNEY'S OFFICE 200 NW 1st AVENUE' DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 FACSIMILE 407/278-4755 Wr1ter'. C1rect L1ne DELRA Y BEACH (407) 243-7090 f L 0 . IDA b:a:d AI~America City , III I! MEMORANDUM Date: July 8, 1994 1993 To: City Commission From: David N. Tolces, Assistant City Attorn~ Subject: Amendment No. 2 to License Agreement Between Ramblin' Rose Riverboat and City of Delray Beach Attached is a revised Amendment No. 2 to the License Agreement with Ramblin' Rose Riverboat. . The amendment proposes the parties split the cost of a 6" sewer line for the purpose of permitting the Licensee to discharge waste while docked at the park. Should you have any questions, please call. DNT : smk Attachment cc: David Harden, City Manager Sharon Morgan, City Clerk's Office . SP 1 ® Printed on Recycled Paper 1__.1. I 1-1 , 1 '..I r. I', t. , : Urr.L'_t. I t.lo. IW. 41,_" I .;.(;') 4,::,::· )U¡ I.) ::::: ~ '::.14 14; [d r . ,_':' .... ... ... -. . ,. , ..,,4..._.._.._................... .-.-- ··-.w ...._..........____--...... . AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO LIC!NSE AGREEMENT BE~EEN IlAMBLIN' ROSE RIVERBOAT AND CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA THIS AMENDMEN'l', to the License Agreement of November 21, 1991, ana Amendment No. 1 dated December 20, 1993, is entered into by and between the CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ("City") and RAMBLIN' ROSE RIVERBOAT, INC. ("Licensee") on this day of , 1994. WIT N E SSE T H; WHEft!AS, the City and Licensee mutually covenant and agree to amend and modify the License Agreement entered into on November 12, 1991, which was amended by Amendment No. 1 dated " December 20, 1993; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to permit t.he Licensee to operate dockside during special events which occur in the City during the year; and WHEREAS, the parties reco9nize that. due the unforeseen circumstances such as inclement weather, machinery breakdown, or bridge breakdown, there may be instances where the boat will be left at the dock for a longer period than usual, Which might necessitate dockside service; and WH!REAS, the parties recognize the need for the Licensee to have an on-site sewage connection in order to facilitate the operation of the excursion boat. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, stipulations and agreements herein contained the parties agree as follows: , '_ .1. I I Mil Ur·.I·'~t.1 :' Urr.Ll...t. I t. L í'W. 4U? 27::: 4755 Ju 1 CI::: , 94 14:29 F' . CI4 .... '. ............ .,. "'~h''''~_'''''.''_''_ . ... ............---....---....-.. - . 1- The recitations referred t:o above are hereby in- corporated herein. ..- 2. That: section 5.05, "Service While Docked" , of the License Agreement is amended to read as follows; A. No service of foo~ or alcoholic beverages shall be effected prior to thirty (30) minute6 before scheduled departure of the boat, in no event shall full meal service begin until such time as the vessel has entered into thè main channel of the intracoastal waterway. In the event that the boat is unable to leave the dock due to 1nclement weather, machinery breakdown, the failure ot the bridge at . Atlantic Avenue to operate, or other circumstance5 beyond the Licensee's control, the boat will be ab~e to remain at the dock while food and beverages are being served. In the event the boat is unable to leave the dock due to the above c1rcumetancel5, all pal5sengers shall disembark the boat no later than 10:00 p.m. B. During speeial u{,,;çaslous such as the Delray Affair, Art and Jazz on the Avenue, and St. Patrick's Day, the Licensee may operate åockside pursuant to the terms of . this Agreement. All food or beverages sold must be consumed on the boat. 3 , The parties agree to each pay fifty percent (50\) of the total cost for the installation of a six inch (6") sewer line for the purpose of permitting the Licensee to discharge waste while docked at the park. The sewage pump shall be provided by the Licensee. Page 2 of 3 '. ;,_.1. I I rï I I I_I r·" i 'i I:.. t '.' WI r J. '·.·L I LL I~LI. .:..¡. ~_.I ! ..:.. ¡ () .:..t I ._.1 __.I ...1 LJ, 1 1,_.1 ':_:' ~ ;.1':"¡' .1.:..¡.. "_.1 1,_.' f' . 1._.1,_.1 . , ..-.------- . . 4. That Paragraph 4 of Amendment No. 1 dated December 20, 1993 shall be corrected to reflect that during years 11 ..- through 14, the annual payment shall be $13,800.00, based on a monthly payment of $1,150.00. 5. That all other terms ana conditions of the License Agreement dated November 21, 1991 and Amendment No. 1 dated December 21, 1993 not in conflict with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect, and are incorporated herein. IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, the parties hereto have Bet their hands the day and year above first written. WITNESS: RAM8LIN' ROSE RIVERBOAT, INC. By: .. (Print or Type Name) (Print or Type Name j' ATTEST: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA By: City Clerk Thomas Lynch, Mayor Approved as to Form and Legal sufficiency: City Attorney .. rambl1nl. A9~ , Page 3 of 3 . - . - XECE/ù£{) 7/ / .2.-/9i.{ bin m~. Iì. R/I&r 18A THE PALM BEACH POST SATURDAY, JULY 9, 1994 s The Palm Beach Post If it won't sail, sink it I t's bad enough that Delray Beach allowed Veterans Park to become a Ramblin' Rose operates dinner-cruise port. It would be worse to allow it to become a commer- only because the law cìal restaurant. was changed to allow it Veterans Park, a 3.5-acrc tract on the north side of Atlantic A venue and on public land. the west bank of the Intracoastal Water- way, has been an oasis in downtown Delray Bcach for generations. Renova- of departure. tions under the city's Decade of Excel- Mr. Andrews' concerns remain val- lence program have given it new charm. id. Exceptions to the no-meals rule The only drawback is Ramblin' Rose. would set a precedent toward convert- Ramblin' Rose is a 98-foot paddle- ing the Ramblin' Rose into just another wheeler that uses the park as a base for downtown restaurant, enjoying an un- meal cruises on the Intracoastal. Dane fair competitive advantage due to use of L. Mark wants the city to amend his public land. The boat's impact on Veter- license so he can serve meals while ans Park would increase, as would the docked under certain conditions. noise that has been the source of com- Mr. Mark cites such special occa- plaints from nearby residents. sions as Delray Affair, 51. Patrick's Day Ramblin' Rose operates only be- and ]azz on the Avenue. Also, he wants cause Delray Beach changed the law to an exemption when the boat cannot sail allow commercial businesses on public due to bad weather or failure of either land. That was a bad decision, one that the boat's engine or the Atlantic Ave- ought to be reversed so Ramblin' Rose, nue drawbridge. the first commercial user of the park, This is not the first time the ques- will be the last once its contract expires tion has come up. There was spirited in 2011. Veterans Park is supposed to City Commission debate over the issue be "a neighborhood/town park with in 1991 when the city first considered varied activities of relatively low inten- allowing the cruises. Then-Commis- sity," according to the city's compre- sioner Bill Andrews led the effort to hensive plan. assure that meals could be served only The city may not be able to guaran- after the boat had sailed, expressing his tee that vision, at least not for the next 1l~/91 concern about the impact on the park. 17 years. But it ought not make a bad Drinks can be served within 30 minutes situation worse. ~ t ~ ¿uJ) ~~¡v 0 'Lo 'll -;;;/~'~ k ~ k;fv~þJ) t,~ ~ (De- ~ '/¿ ~. /~~ db ~~~. ~ I tÛu cßcv /). ~ , . PETITION I 8~:n-ee l1Jith the attached letter concerning the Ramblin F~oso P,AQIL.ß, _.PJ~:.RRY+,PRE SIDEIU'___._____ _.':J!-:f.~~-1lIz-It¡C¡ 1'I1Jvß. ), / ~') ).? )^-,/ CAEQL..U.ULli._F.RANK,."..J[. P RF. S . __::l¡~li ¡~~, /?'1.2-d~iA:¡(l ~.-- JAM.EE._ß-"-_G...'..BRIEN",,._ T RF. AS ILRER-_ .2':i.{f..- if-h71-£" 7hk¡ . ¿T , MA'L.1.A._ßlLCHANAN.~. - >~- ~Ó~ --- I?E.:.T-ER __ç . COJ9ig:.ð!?_L_~h.____ ,<""é-<._ ( V 'I / FRANK X. HARRINGTON 1k£_1-~~.J/Xjqt/ ----~.... - DAVID M. MARSH t/k¡-f~~ ~ ~'i'/t(Y ¥...'_.._--~-~ - SIMONE POULAIN ~ ¿;., -- ,1¿'17''þ ~.(/ á J'-£{//a¿..n// RUBY B. VAN ROOYEN _.~---- _c.-_ ... _.~-- "------- ------ -.--.---".--._--.-.--~~.-~---- -_._----,--- --- ..____________~_____.--._·w______ -. -~------_._-----,-~....P~--~--_·_~-~._-._--- ------- --_._- . PETITION I agree with Lhe attached letter conceY'ning the Ramblin Roso 2~-:i ~= __217djj;ld¿4;Æ1/ _~~_~~~~(~-- 'J~ J:!-jj¡ Lf:::tJh~~~ ¡; , ~-=+~ ~e Iv C .___~__ _~ _ _ _ LtCC. ul''-- ,'M>:L-~ ~~dJ£L/l:J~ . dL&oCN~--'3, . . ~~. 4f ", A<J Ij' 1 __ .-Ì._ _ _ __~_ __¡/r4"" ."[j¡/~__ rÎ9rߣ ~~~ #?k~/Ä .~- ----- ~. d¿ j d---lM/ --- -ðÞcr .~ -. -~ ~ '~ ! ~~ Îì~ --....-----------..----. . ~-_...._.. -------- -24 l2-1 - - --- -o. t!YhA!.. .~ -- ~---- CtL~ " _..~------ m~~. ~ .----6. ~.~~ - ~~-:, ..~~--~ --.---- ------- .._~---~-~ !m, \ ~~~/ ...-.. _._---~.:......_-,- .~._._._,..- -~._---~.,-~------~.......~----- _._""--_..~------,.._.._~-----------_..~_......'"_.----- d11QAl0~~ --------------.--------- . , ~ ~ARR TERRACE A CONDOMINIUM FIFTY EAST ROAD DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33483 I have been asked to represent the 95 owners of Barr Terrace in registering a complaint on the increasing disturbances made by the Ramblin' Rose cruise boat that is docked oppo- site our building on the Intrq.coastal Waterway. This is not a "single" complaint. We are striving to eliminate activi- ty and noise from the boat while it is in dock. We have no complaint about the cruise or music playing while the boat is moving down the waterway. The music would only be heard for a few minutes as it moved along; but to have music and, especially the calliope playing while the boat is docked is exceedingly disturbing. On holidays and at the Delray Affair the boat makes many short cruises rather than their regular schedule. In be- tween the short trips the calliope plays constantly while the boat is in dock. This should not have to be endured. Captain Mark has asked to be able to continue this, plus being allowed to play it whenever there is something going on Atlantic Avenue. We ask that the dockside music be eliminated and the music started and stopped just before the bridge is reached. We are much too close to the Ramblin' Rose to be helped by a reduction in volume. We hear very little from the children's playground, and we invite any of you to spend a day at Barr Terrace while this music goes on. During the past year Captain Mark has added other activ- ities which certainly were not represented to us when the boat moved in. These have been parties that continued on board, dockside, for the entire evening and some for part of the evening. We have documented dates when various viol- ations have occurred. (See attached.) We asked that the 6:15 "happy hour" be put back to 6:30 as is specified in their contract--with departure at 7:00 pm. This is not to quibble over 15 minutes. It is an indica- tion that the intent of the contract was to limit the time of dockside entertainment. Since your first meeting, he has complied with this as it was in violation of his contract. We are greatly concerned with the noise level, the calliope, and (in winter) a live orchestra on some nights that is "wired for sound" and is deafening when it comes back at 10pm. , . . We are also concerned about commercialism getting into the park. It's a lovely park~ and a place for families. We oppose the selling of alcoholic beverages from the boat (as was done on St. Patrick's Day) as it will attract young peo- ple that could present a problem. There are plenty of bars that would welcome the business. His selling it was against a city ordinance. Captain Mark has picked up on our com- plaints and asks that you legalize these violations and dis- turbances. We ask that you bring this commercial endeavor in line with the needs of the residents who were here long before Ramb- lin' Rose. This is not a resort hotel, these are our homes. We buy them, we maintain them, and we pay substantial taxes. Again, we are only concerned with the activities of the boat while in dock. We have nothing against the cruises, but we want it to remain a cruise boat. Just in case someone should ask, let me say that we have many age levels living at Barr Terrace. We are all not over 90 as implied at times. We gave a party for a 100 year old lady and we have a baby shower coming up next week; and there are many ages in between. ~~~ May Buchanan Director . . . RAMBLIN' ROSE February 18th Party held the entire evening dockside. March lOth Boat returned at 9:00pm. Party continued until 10pm. March 14th Calliope played all day in dock between 1 hour boat rides. March 14th Reported by a resident, beer sales all day to the pub lic. March 24 Party while in dock 6:45 to 8:15, back at 11pm. Not rainy, not windy. Supposed to return at 10pm. March 25th Party on board in dock 6:15 to 7:30. March 29th On board at 10:30am, musio playing. Left at 1lam. During Delray Made short trips all day. Calliope played con- Affair stantly in dock between trips all day. May 2nd Sign in Ticket office window for the sale of soft drinks. We had srnneone buy one, so the sales are to the public. Sunday May 15th Passengers on board 5pm. Orchestra group"tuning up" very loud. Left 6:00 to 6:15, an hour and 15 minutes of "happy hour". Friday May 20th Passengers on board 6:00pm. Boat left at 7:20 pm. Returned at llpm with a very noisy crowd and music. It; X~ - THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT HAS BEEN GOING ON THIS YEAR. ~ , . {l/ - ('Jt) / CITY COMMISSION WORKSH PREPARED BY: DIANE DOMINGUEZ DIRECTOR OF PLAN MEETING DATE: JULY 12, 1994 SUBJECT: FLORIDA MAIN STREET PROGRAM The Florida Main Street Program, sponsored by the State Bureau of Historic Preservation, recognizes cities that are working to preserve and revitalize their traditional downtown centers. The program provides a statewide network of people and businesses who have successfully promoted their downtown areas, and have seen those efforts pay off in the creation of new jobs and increased business opportunities. Main Street cities are also eligible to receive a $10,000 grant to cover the costs of program activities. There are currently 32 Main Street cities in the State of Florida, and over 850 nationwide. Pineapple Grove Main Street, Inc. was created to implement the Main Street Program for the Pineapple Grove commercial area (see attached map) . The group is made up of business and civic leaders who will be following the Main Street approach to revitalize the Pineapple Grove area, whether or not the designation is actually achieved. The attached brochure explains the program and the organization in greater detail. The group's first task is the preparation and submission of the application for the Florida Main Street designation. An important component of that application is a commitment by the City for financial and other support to help ensure the program's success. Financial support is being sought from other sources as well, including the CRA, the DDA, area businesses, and individuals and organizations. The funding will be used to cover the salary of a Main Street Coordinator, as well as the costs of office space, program operations, and specific projects. An operational budget is currently being finalized, and will be available for review at the workshop. The group is asking the City to make a commitment for at least 3 years of funding and in-kind services. As currently envisioned, the Department of Planning and Zoning will provide technical support to the Main Street organization, with the Director acting as the group's City liaison. Main Street Coordinator Tom Fleming and members of the Pineapple Grove Main Street Task Team will be present at the workshop to further explain the program objectives and benefits, and to address questions regarding the nature of the City's commitment. Attachments: * Map of Pineapple Grove Main Street Area \;151 * Pineapple Grove Main Street Brochure . , II JI) // 7T {II 1 I I ~/ NL 51H CT. I - . ~¿¡ [ ] '==~'L 4 ';:!!! ~ [... ~" ]~ I ~ ~ l.AK£ IDA ROAD N.E. e - - - 4,.. e - - ST. - --...... -: f : @ @D @) ¡ ~,~ I , ~ ..J I , < < I! ~ ,; ~ < - I 'DE! ~ I ¡ , -- -, . I~ WDDN.£. t;;-¡¡¡ 3IID ~ :~ ML JIll) ~ - " ! ~ Q~ ~ ~ @ ¡ wi, > , <DS I 1/11 . M.E. 3m ST. n#~ NL am -, ~~ @~ .=~ ~ ~ ~::¡ a õ CD CD _ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii HALl Z õ I!i o -- III Z ,... I , ..... Z LL ~ 1ST ST.'I 1ST S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡Iff ~ ~ ¡,. . I/) I ,~",,:"": o 0 . I, z z I , > > ClUJ I , ~ ~ mnn SQtOOL Ii 1./ II! I-- . F STADI* l J SOJME --1 ~ I~I fC]Jo"- ATLANTIC AVENUE - ~ = f JDQDO I1DDc:::J(J-- = 0 II I~ I J ~ . I ~ ~ f- 50£. ~ J ~ 1ST ST. '--- ~ t PINEAPPLE GROVE t ~~:"A. MAIN STREET AREA -- DIGITAL MS'I' MAP SI'S7DI - , ~ Oý9f1-9Ll (LOý) ýýýff f!P!Jo/J '4Jf!ag Æf!J/aa anua"v J!JUf!/lV J5f!j LOl wf!J8oJcf JaaJJS U!f!W 5,4Jf!ag Æf!J/aa ':)NI ' J.D1lLS NIYIt 3¡\01J9 7IddnNld >~ ~I I ~ ~~ I I [==:J I I:.... .. tIC .. S----~ ..".- T----r.... " w :Þ \: > I fC·~___I;1 ;"" ,"'" ~ ~ tt z z ~ z '" 2: it-I4 ~ ~:z: a ~ ¡" !" N.LZMA'" !oo : i .... ~ ~ fA <;¿ ~ ::1 I¡I 1¡c::::==J~ .1. l~~ ~o DJ -t ~ ~L I~I P=c::::==Jr::: \I ~ 3 = ~ > n NUdA... =' ~ < ~ ~~ :uBD ;; ~ ft "" : N.L~A... ~ : tt1 ~ ... I II I .!oi ~ ~-i--,-9-i-~z---ii;'----'X ~ I j. g 11C. ~ ~ g'}. ~ i. ~ "'1:;" g' ~ ~ It ,= ..~ 0 ~ ~t1i...3 n! 111"' ~ ~ ~1i! Ie ci - g.::I ii- ~ ~~~_.. a "":J i.5ï -- ~ ;:ro o ~f i'! ~ ~ [ ". Q ... ..." !J ,i i'~. a -. ~ i:.I! ã ! §: .... C Dol r ~ <" ~ _ -< ~ I _. WI ~ :t a" :A '11 _. ~ .. ã: -< s- ~ ~ is: ~ ~ ~ s g.f ~ .,. ~. S" ~ 3 ª. ~ i ~ lit ~ q ~. [ ;:s £a. ~ ; ~ i ~ -. ~ 2. t ~: 8 ... ~ ~ ~ ~ [~ ~ [ ~ I ~.... or ~ t;. !." ¡I ~ i- m ~ ,,~ g- '2 I: r: -12. ~ õ:c "' ~1 2 et ~ ~ :;- - _ 0 c .'" C::r ~ _. ..ø If _ tt \I' ttI ~.;'¡ n - ....... .... 3':: i c!~ '",~!I ,,~. 'I ~~i'...~~¡¡ë·z :;¡~.... ~ . QQ::I II :J ~ It ... ¡¡ Q ..... ~ ¡ !. ~ "' "i.."' "' '... I õ!f ~ ~... ~Q~ &.õã.~~ =n~na;'¡g'r [["': .... < il.. ... 0 0 :E S. ' ¡: II" -"' . :E.... 2.=. {~ I L~!i [tæ'?-~ if.~!C~~ï~~S" Ig;!9:;P · c:::I !I'I '.. ~" ¡: 1:. §;¡ § ~ -." Ii - 1- -.... c::i i E ,. ~ 5'~ 5. "' ~t r i'~ =:!1=.~::: !C~~ ~~',¡ ~ ~ 5' ~ i' ¡;¡ 3 n' ~.... ii" 0$ f ~ ...:J '1 :J == ~ ii - :. ~ a, ¡¡ ~ I ~~ ~ ¡(I ..3 ~ 3' ~ l ã.~ ~ ~ f . it ~ rt ~ ~. ~. r ii i':r ~ ~ 1;' ~ " 1\.. or 9'~ ,.,~"gll ~ _~...~~ I"IZ~!!Lõ~-< :!!I i §" g S 5' ~.. "' n ! ~ lit l' I o' 7. ~'-. ~!L Ii ~ Ii""' ~ ¡;;; 5!ii' §. i !. a Q 3- . æ i· ! ~ ~ = ~ ri CI if! ~ ,1f ~. a ~ ~ :ï;; .~ c: C " J s.~' ~ ft ... 8" a'1-= III . - ~. ¡¡;. ~ 'I' - if Q. f 'I' VI ~ :! ..... ¡¡;' :to ¡œ 3 -!!!. ~ ~ ~!I i' ~ ..¥' I:J ~- .... tl°~ cQ i g Q' ~ !! -. g, ~ 3 l ~ S';¡" .... 3 ~ .. J _::I 1"1 II i.... -'.. :I o -. ~ ¡ S 1"1 . 5·K ,2-..."2:,... ~o- I./t it:J7 jt 0,< "":I~ -::I e¡ ". g..~. -sE¡-·... ~ c _a ~ i ~ ~ itA ~=S':-~'- ð!i" ~..i~~·¡·lr~~ ;:t. ~ I ¡r ç f~ i ~ ~;.; f! ~¡-~2! I.. ~!.:>g·g1 [-g.~~.§" ~ ~ :::! ;:so; 'I' .g:J -I :r 'l ::I ~ 1 8- !1 ~ " a a .... 3 ~ "3 :;" ~ "' 1 ..... ~ ¡;¡ ,ª' If ¡ = Co . ~- ~ t ~ ~ ; ~! j _ g; ~ ~ ~ ~ g' - ~ ~ ' g C f" ~ à-~ ~ ~ [~ti;: !i~'l ~ ~!~~ ~~~i g ~ ~ § i I ~ ~ ø ~. ~J ~. i i -! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J 1: ~ 1 ~ f S. S· i l ili ! I· ~ i i ~ ~ f J i ~. t! i ~: g ¡ t. r i. f ~...,.... ~;g t CD i1 -< "'i":"~_ -!- !!Li"~3-:J~~E T ::I ~ ~. -< ~ ~1It 0 !~; == ~ ~ ~ 1 ~';¡ ~ .. ~ - " g ;5' ~ 312 ¡ ~ õ' - ,õ' ~£ '!:! <...."":.=i'~~... .... ::I ¡¡ _ = ~ _ "'j ~.... _C:;¡~Q.c:¡¡:3- æ c: ¡ 0 - ii" i' S!: ¡ ª.,¡ 0 g ==¡ "' :ç -, ~ i :g ~ !'!!!.~:::2" ~l ~3¡¡ ~n:J is'''IQ. i'D"" . ¡¡ CD i!§. :š- !J3 a~~ S'l s, o -< It 3 0 c: - ¡¡;. c: WI - ò t ~ ,õ' ~;¡ [i~ ìl§;~"2 [ i'J <' ~ qa JC"'i. ;t",o ~.,tI",a- ~,. ~ '" g. ,,~~ . íi Q. 9 -;0' s, <r ¡;;' ____________________.X . ~ ~ " ~ - - 'II oi' ~ ." ~ i'"C." "C "C "!!~. 3 ~. ~ < a-"C =. - .... '" -, <1) 0 ~ Q. ~ Q,I "D t't iU -. ~ ~ -r 0 0'" < coo ~ ...", "C-«~.- CVt~~'O 0; 0 ~ :1§:10~:=VO:1~,d s:w _ 1"'J..!.It i""I Q.I I"'J ... _. _"C AI ~ CJ :I . _. _:1 ~ Q,. ~." ~ ~o:lg.Q.¡c~.c::l~::>J:~ iD"C.....··~al"1o -<s¡..~osr.~~:»~ r:r-Al~»O:1 r:r""'1it0 ~"9..7-"'tJ""'C<"'A 11'1 ~r'þ;:]="'-"'- S s¡ iiJ -.!i ::>.a' I - ~ õ .. to a 3 a "2 =, 'II ¡¡:;- c: g-.. "C " ;. ~ 0 ~ 111 V> . :3' "QI ë: -< r'\ ~ tI!. QI C g ~ ;:0.' ... ~ (1 C .... 3 ~ ~~. -:. :II ~ < ~ COlli _. > ro" =t c.. .. I'D" to'" ..::>to ,.....-. -.. _.N::> ~<_·a-3 =::. f I'þ 0", ::>0 :::;. AI ~ ~ " c.. 0 ~ "" .=: (" 0- a 7 I'D Q Q.I ~ :r aa Q a. N =: 3 ò' 3 ~. :':' ("þ -<:Þ =- < J'" VI rill ~ AI N "0 < Q.. =. - A.I - 0 AI 1""1 .... ::s'" - -t < .. c:c 'w I'f - ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 ~: g,.~.; g- r'þ ~ ~ g ~ :r ~ ~ ~ g ~ § Q.. g Vi : n 0 ~;J ~ ~ J: ~. c: 0 Q." ~ õ' 0 ::> :5' 0 ~ . ~ 0 " ~ to ~ ~ "8 Q. ::> ::> Q. -. ~ ::> ~ - 1'1> Co ~ '" '" .. =. ~ 8 ~ ~ == -< ê' ~ S. ? < == ~ i õ ~ g~' ~ ~ ::;""C ~ ::s ; :¡ ~ ;. 0 ~ f~' ¡ ~ I'!) 3 ::J ~ ~ ~ :. 0 :r 0 ~ ~ ~ 3 OQ ~ :ð Co ~. ~ ;¡ ~ ~. 0 õ ~ :;, 3' ..... -;. ~ 0 ~ ~ :< 2.. ~ Õ It) 0 a -< i" ~ ~ g' "C ~ ~ ~ s. ~ ~ _. IT) ~ _ ~ a ~ ª= ~ ~ ~ ¡¡;. ~ i$ - ,.. CJ ,r;¡ ~ ~ .g ~ 2.. Õ Õ ~, a ¡;;' ò Ò ~ ~ ~ 2.. ~ ~ s. ~ ¡- ~ ã ." a ~ ~. c.:" ; != æ ~ æ.. _ ¡;;' __ IT) < .... ... ~ - 0 _ 3 It) ~ - - 00 .;:::¡' It) V' IT) c: :::. -. IT) ~ .,., ~ ~ c- -..... ~ ......-.IT)!"CI ~~:r o-3rDlT)"C-+1T) ....,....-1"'1 J<"._ -,.."CžI'D V'I'" -< ¡;;' S' :. :r ~, ~ õ ~' j rD _ ~ Co. ~ a :r 0 Q ~ ~ õ ~ Z I'D ~ Ñ· g :Þ "0 CIa ~ I'D "< g:¡~~O~~~~~"'a8 tt-<~.~~,31T)~ ~~'~s.:g~;1~. ~~~=.. 1)0;1 i1i <ii.:g ~ 0 a Q. to ~:'ï::> .. :i'.. -< g !a t Q ¡¡: to ~ '" n ii' 0 ~ g OJ '" C) '" 1:1 3 æ 9a :. ¡;;- ~ i' ~ 0 ;-. ~ ~ ~ : ~ a ~ ~ g' :i' ~ ~ ~ ~ -< 8 ~ = ~ "'0 ~ Q) ò ~ ~ ~ g. a- ::> C') ~ ~. ::> ~ ¡c .. "C - "C ~ =. .. V> - _. Q. ~ a- ~ ~ 0 ~ cia OJ ~ < ;:' =' ,..., ~ -< Q ... ~ g 0.< õ; g: % õ' i" ,:-'~, ~ ¡ oi õ' I"' ~ ~ ~ õ' 0 ~ 5' ~ ~ (Ii n 3"'''' "C " 0 ~.. _. < .. ~ ,,- '" Ii ~ .. ... ~ Q. J '. ... -" ::> V> -~ 0 s: ... _ ;i ~ - ~ < en C") - I'D Q _ J :r c: IT) 3' ~.. c:: IJIIIôI _. - Ii: 0 - - ~ ........ ~ -8 _.: sw =-'::1 ~ õ'" i" :t ~ :> ~ ~ ". ~ OQ ;- ~". ~ ~ ..., :Þ : ~ ~ 3' _. '''' ~. ~ .; ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 i" * ~ ~ ~ 'i' ~ ~. 8 : .. ~ ~ ~ ~. g' ~ ~ Æ ð £ ,1'1> ~ ~' ::> ª ;p ~ . ~ 0 ~ -:r a. to ~ 'i' ~~, ~ 15 -. ~; a. T ~ ~ ~ - 00, r.r rD"',~ '". ". ~"'c:~n 1)11) "-' '" = " 0 ° _. - ~ ~.. ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ OJ CJ -.' 3 1'1>:;) 3 æ.. g ",,' c: ii. ~ ~ (þ... ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ 'õ" _. Õ 3 ~~ ¡¡. t ~ ~"8 ~ ~ S' -g ~ 1t· § ~ õ 9 i ~ ~ ~ f i ~ ~ 0 ?\. 3' ~ 3· - ~ ê' ~ æ. :: g II' ". ~ ~ ~ ij;' ~ .2, õ· ~ ~ == ~ a";;. .. · · 1r V> c: 0 to =. '" ~ ~ ¡¡ " ~ '" "'3 ::;: ~ to ;¡;. .... (j" 9- 0 9" :::I ::> - ~ W;' I'D ~ (j _ CD::I VI ..... - (j ::I - =. - ~ =. -< CD 3· (' :s c ::a.:1 =. D.I !.II" -< Q.. n c- ~ .... i' 9 ~ ~ j 3' ~ ~ iìì ~. ~ t 1 z õ i [~ ::> .æ 8 :¡: 8 ~ ~ ~ : ~.! ~,r~ci !!r 1!. s: ~ g .ii· :T ~ ~ :P II to -:r š' j ~ g '!! ci œ. j' g- iõ ~ :»0 ci ~ i" c 5- ?- g ~ ü! ¡c ~ ü! !!. :l i'I f ~ iJ::ø o!!! ~ 1'1>" 1'1> 0 :z I ~ f. ~ t' if iI ~ l!' ~ f - š: ~ ii ~ i" ~ 1 ~ ã: 1 a õ; ~ ~ ~.~ i to gª i" ii "0 ~ ~ o'~: a:' ~ ~ ¡;:< '"':::>_:¡~'" ,;--:r..9...._J-<::> <;:n(ll-Q..~'!I·""C _-ciQ" OQ-:r" ,,~(IIgl~~tO-Q.3 "!!iõi'i~ !!"," ::.S¡ii¡¡~a"tOo1g_. ~;;¡:TOJo õ)1'I>I'I g, ~ ¡ 2 - ~ ¡ ~ ~: ª- ~ ¡ ~ :: ~ ¡ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ;: 3 §. ~ ¡ ª ~ :' ¡; ~! ~ ~'~ ,3 ,,' ~ "'tf i ~ ::> ~ ~ .. ~::> ~ .. ii -. ~ -< .. -:r => g It It ~ ii' ::> 0 ~ -< ~ if;:L ¡;¡." '" OJ" .. 0 ':.0 "'tf + ~;.~. ; iIi' ~ -". ~ ~ l 5- ~ &. ~'l 'à ~ ~ :: ~. ~ ~ 'a&."' g- g,'!! g.( ~.c2 ¡: g'~' ~ ~ ~ ~ _tt"Q I» C II' ;:'~!"CI=(' ~ t*) 3·~-· II'::I~ ~. ~~n o~~.. - "C <"D-. I. Ii ~ Ii ~. ì 3' O!I~~. ~ '^ s. ¡ ~ l, t~. .. g'~ ~ 3 ~ ~ fi ~ ¡ '^ ;:; G( -" ,3 :: õ g' 5 6.:' ~ . iIi_._ ~ æ¡æ _.."C < -.,.. .. -.. ~ ~~s¡" _....::>1:::>" "tI ~ '" OQ OJ ¡;,:¡ c:Ð :I ::> :I.;¡;. -:c to::> c: .. =>:. ::: Q::: Q. ~ "to ü! ~ ~' Q iÞ ~ ~ '" ;:: ;;; . 0 - .... I ; ! -!:l - 0 :JI .. 3 Q. g: -.. , N ~ -< I'D !!C ::. ~..~ "~11 - 0 ::. - '" OJ c:" ~ \ ~ ~ .... 9. ~ " ::>.. 3 i'ï Ii Ii:i. :l ::>.. ~ a... ~ .. &. ~ ::> fII ~ 3 = :S. õ" ~ 0" - I It -. n tD· < Q. ~ AI _. .. ~ __ ~ ::I 0 _ ::I -.,,~. g, "C ~. ~ c. VII;¡.... fI"V if" ~.i IX or ~ ~ ~ ã 3 ~ ~ ~~' ~ :: a ; ~~. ~ ~ ~ l. ~'I qÌ rg' õ' ò ~.I'I> Co ~ . ~ 0 ! !!L ~,,~ g: ~ _ ~ ~ ~. => ~.. c: ~:I.."C -'a ~ :I. '!I .. " ,.., '" 1:1 a. ii 0 d .". r~~;;: to ~ @'S¡ !!~ =~ to~~ g~&.~·"1-a.~o1:g~~ 'o102.=¡- O!.:;~ ~ . ¡¡¡-:: 2 'a n:l i" " ~ to iiJ 00 => -. ~ g- I...· 5i ii' - Q: I '" - 3 ~ :} 5'~ ... , " ~ 9 '" to II _. - !;:;; a to~. !! t ~ _. !!!. OJ ~ ~ 1'1> 1'1> -=' ,to ::ï a § ~.S! '" 'P" .. Q.!! º ci OQ R c: 1'1> Co ~.. 011 "." ìi' à. CL.~ ~~7~"'n c.:g ::I~-oc-<' ê;:Þ" .... Co" .. 3 -." tIP' ....~ 3 OJ Q ;;¡ 0 ::: 8 0 aI 5' ê, ~ ~ -- ::I - I'D -::I 1) ('þ ."It o :r AI ~. CL VI \1_4 ~J~i¡l~ r il~ ~.~ ~im· 'f.~ î~l ~ ~'i ~~~~g ~ ª ~ § ~.; :i' i ~. [~ i ~~ I ~!' ¡ ~ ~ i ¡ ~ f f iJ f80 t ~ t. f i i:' ~ i § [~: ~ ~, ~ ~!ª'~I~~!~lf;~~i~~~ ~J~J~i'~ª~i= i~~ilf!' ~l:r~~~ ~~ ~ z ~:¡ to ? _ II ;; 51 =. ,., So s¡~. a º !!!.! d. ~ ~ So ~!! - 1 ~ (II I:~. ,,- 1'1> 3 .~ I 11''<_ ¡; I'Dcií ~ AI .~~II 3·g. ~ r:rQ. "0 »::1 ;0" a.Þ :. ~ ~ l ~ ~ i ~ ~ i:~. ! I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1· ~ ~ ~!I ~ ~ !i!. f ~ ~ -¡ § s C!" ~ ~ ~ æ _.__Q.--~ --~ "-of "æ~œ.' -'a_i::> -<I ~ UI 0 --< 3 . ~·~~.~!i~j~lf~;CJ1Iri ;;~~~ ~_~, ~~:"!!I .i ~ ::' ~aI c: I OOto-,<, ".5..'!n ¡¡"fill ..o",!! 3a.-·1"::>;;:"'~;~ :T OI'l>::>Co r ~ 3 [I t ¡r !. ~ ~ ~l!~. ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~. J t~ ~ ~ i ~ f ;. ~ i ~ ~ ! ~ æ" s¡ ~ ". § :::I to '" '" ~ ::>::> ~ .. 0 ~ a. 0 n -' l;" Q -, OJ ~ 0 Co ~-:. ~ ~~-'='C')~3 _Q.v>õ~ ~ =>." :5"¡æ'¡'='~1 g -< 1'1> 3 ~ !!:¡: f g, ~.z~ª.g:=~ ~lig~ -·I~~~'&!!!~!!.. !!.. g'ò' 32 ~g. ~ CJ ~z;;ci¡¡n3' &.::> d.~ ~ ~ a SQ. ,=.' ~ OJ 3 ~ ~ ~..., _. !1. = ~ ;¡;'.. "" º .. ~ ~ -. to ii' 8- = õ' 9 ~, 'ii' OJ g. _. oJ. ~.. 1 ~ -'a Ii> "" 3 .. '" -. ::>~ Ii> -. '" => < -. ::> OJ ? .. _;¡;... 3 ::> 0.....:::.. ... 0 .. "",' OQ - 3 ¡; -< .. -:< ~ ~. .=> iõ ::> or -. 0 - - ;:a § 3' ::>.§..n ~.OJ ,,' Q.f=· 9 - 'P ç,\. ~;; ~ fi: ~ &. æ ¡ g!" a. ~ ." ,iN - - -. VI ~ - ...;.. &J - -. Q,I CD ~ t.. '!.: :f ~ e: ! ,," ~ -g õ ~: g'-g n S' ~ I e,~::l C"\: ~ ~ - ~ t 2 t ¡ ~ ª' s ~ :g i1i ~ Q I\Þ ~:I _t"\ ~I.I'I 1.1'11.1'1 _ "";:C I\Þ 1,1:<:':'1"'1 ~ I ~ g. ~ ~ ~ ~ 9. 3 ~ ~ ð: ~ S· ã ~. ~J if ~ ~ ... ~. ~ 1 ~ r S· j ] ~ . ~. _. ;; a. ~ ~ [~ ~ ;: -< ii! ::I" 0 - n ~.. 3 i ~ ~" .. '" ii;:;¡ ~ 3 '" .:. a." ~ v, -!5 J" . ~ ~ to !II -. .. _. -. _. :> - ~ l ~ ;. ~ 1 ".; . g' ~ j! ~ ~r i~· ; ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ i Ii" f i " g; ~ ~ ~~. ai ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J ~ i ~ ¡ ~. ¡ S· ¡ ~ ~ ~! ã ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ t l ¡ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~. ci i r~' J ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡: ..... Ii" <: g' ~ ~ ;r f ~ ~ :!. ¡; ~ g ~ ii ~ ~ ii" to OJ ~ - ". S' ~.. t ~ [~ ~ 1 ~ <:::: [~~l ~ ~ -.: 8, ~ f 9- S: it ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ š. ~ ~ it ~ ~. ~ [ ~ I ~~. (: 3 ~. tg, 3. ¡ ~ ~ _. ~ <".::1 .....tOto 0:>- -co <:3'~ v, _. "8::>~" '.. Q.~ >;" g_Q. t03''''<:>- æ~-::::~~ !¡~'" ¡;;.Q.CJ~3:; ¡¡-Õi iiJ-<:xg'õ~g' ....3.. '" _ _'! ~ :¡ '" n" , , <... < 0 !1. -. c: '" '" :x - 0 .. => - ~ :::I ~ ~ ~ C1 Q ::I AI s:: "0 :r > :r :;.. 1'1 _. ~. - ¡J := :J ""' ~ ~ II' (þ ~ ;. l ñ' .."" ~".-, QQ. :::t o a .. ~ S· S· a ~' ... ~ 0 to" ii !:. g -< l~' S· .. I 1i! ~ S' to .. ~ ~ S' ,,:2. ~ ~ ~ g ~ ¡¡ 1; - ~ ~ ; ~ ~. ~ õ i :i' ." 0 .. g' ~ ~ g 'ð s¡ ~ ~ ~ [~ ~ § ~ ., Q' ~.. ': õ a !I ~! S· ~ ! ii' ~ ¡;; Ii" ~ ~. !II ~. s¡ ~ g, ~ .3 - 5; g .g æ ~ ii ~ ~ ; ? ~ ... => ~:!~o v,o -II! -<nC) "JzJ(" -<~- ,-"- ~"~<-;n~ S' oì Q. "3 ~ ¡¡ Q' i .a. 7'\ -!5 ... ~ a -g ~ ~ ~ g- iJ:!! ... i ~ !! ~ æ ~ ~ ~ to '" = *' ~ ii~ ~~2~ ~~~ ~i~ ~ì~~~'§'1 ~~~ ~¡g, !~~i~~~~ ii" _, ã' "< - 9- - ,:¿ ~ ~ '"" a :r ~ ti'" 1.1'1 Q - ~ :;:~ ~ ¥. 3- ~ c;:) i ~I!!:" 1'1 :':' ~~At - ~- -o~;-< :t I ~ ~ if ." '- . .~ ..-... -- - AnC~HHA - The heart of CGrtraJ. Florida. 813/ MIAMI SHORES - The- vil1.1gc b¡Oa tti",¡J 49·l-·iO;)3 30e /795-2207 AUBUHNDALE - NEW PORT RICHIE - 11e v i t;¡ Ii ï.] 11 ¡' YOUI' central desti- tomon-ow';:; downtown tocllY. 3] 3:842-b'H)() na tion. S 1.:31965- m,w Sl\H'RNA BEACH - We're eh""t lne rCJ) 6159 you. 904/42:3-8680 AVON P AR1{ - OCALA - The friendly city. 904/()2tJ-8c: 2:3 City of charm. 813/ PALATHA - Home of the Anmwl BIut' CrIb 452-1205 BAR'f(IW - History in the rna.king. 813/534- Fcstival. 904)325- 441)6 4030 P lLNAl\l,. \" CITY - CHIPLEY - 904/638-4157 Share tne future. DADE CITY - Proud heritage· promising' fu- 90i/7f5<'554 ture. 904/567-0284 PERHY - A com~ DELAND ~ Centrt'll FloridEl'~ }1istoric tr~:asurø. m1U1it y ill IprOl/l ng a 904/738-0649 comrr:nnlty. ~J041 Frr. PIERCE -The sur ris(~ city. 407/466-.3,S80 584-5 }6ti HAINES CITY - The hcart of Florida. 813/ PL.AHT ;ITY - Florida's winter stmwberry 421·490ß c,~pital. ' 131'154-1745 IŒYWESrL'-Anwrica'sC lribbeanish'1!!d. 305/ Q UINCì - Diversity abounds. 904/627-2:346 292-8255 SJ~BRIJ':} - Where hospitality i~ our Iniddlc LAKE CITY - Gate ,,/üy to flol'id[1. 9U4ti¡:;5- n, lnw. ~) :3/:3E ~~ 06:19 i D02:3 STOA t',. - E ~\lltìsh capital of the wCirld .10';' LA1(E WALES - ' 286-2¡ P' Hot out of the wa/, TARF' () ~ SJ 'lUNGS - Sponge ('(¡pital of the., ,lust out of the ordi· wcrld, u"3/9· :2·5605 nary. 813/G7G-2ô:ja· TJ'!'Ob\ lLL ~ - Space City U.S.A. is buildíng LAIŒ WORTH - on bistlJ (. 4, )-;269-7;)63 407/58ß-1600 VENlC I : - S i 1, t'k's tooth capital of the world. MARIANNA ~ 8 t:3/484 ;72~ Bringing back WlNT1': t G \1 ~DE!'¡ - HOTlle of tho Annu¡tl Marianna's best. 90 J/4í;2-60'J.6 Passu !l~tle! II Pag"élnL 40'7/656-6:\63 , , . + Welcome to PINEAPPU: GROVE MAIN STREET N. E. 4 T H S T REf T (L A K E J D A R 0 AD) if,', - - r m, I' ITl' II I i !I I , ,I, I I ¡ i. i: : I , :, 'I I I ILl , , I, I, : l I: i :I! I I /+-11 '-__~~I~ u~ LJ ://1 - - N.E. Jrd 51. ,[I ~--- , 'I~ ~!,r----" ~ .. ~ 'oill',,,, I [,I ~ Ii I~I ~ !~ II I~I 1/1... I ~c-_ -; ~ I~ I .:;1 ' IT,! ~-~""I · W ...., I ...., if 1 N II >t 2~~ ,2' Z! ,~, . II ___I _~ L-JL-- ,---¡II " nc--- ,_,~E. 2nd 51. ~~~ n : .!: ! i I , ,i ' I I ' p,' · i ! ¡-l I I,; I ' I ~ Ii ,. I : r[1 I [ : I ... ~I ' / I : .;1 I ~~ ILJ~ / / :.(~ N, E Is< 51. ! r ~ _~ I "_" '-----, ~~ I.~, ~- ~ I': ' , ,I"; ¡¡'I ill,,! "I ",:if' I., ',' 'f . , I ¡ ,'. , I, ; I [, ¡ !/~/: IL· ~~~ LJ I L_ t__.._~ ~,__-,,'+/L ! A TLANTICiA VENUE De/ray Beach's MAIN STREET Program + , . c The Main Street Program ... a comprehensive revitalization strategy that encourages economic revitalization within the context of historic preservation ... . 1977 - National Historic Trust for Preservation Pilot program - "The Main Street Project" . 1980 - National Trust - Main Street Center Six-state demonstration project · More than 850 communities in 38 states · In Florida, 32 communities have joined since 1985 - the results include: $167 million in reinvestment 760 new businesses 2,600 new jobs . more than 1,700 building rehabilitations PLNEAPPI.Æ 6ROVE MAIN STREET :( DELRA y BEACH'S MA.IN STREET PROGRAM . , . . r-c---' - U'U_ _" - -- .", ~~-- .- -.. . - . --. ... ,., - .. .- ~ The Main Street Approach The foundation of the Main Street Approach is : . preservation of the built environment and of ; the human resources of the downtown or neighborhood business district. · Promotion · Design , · Economic Restructuring I I .'. Organization '-----~.. . ,.,. . "" ., u. . -, ". .... .,- PINEAPPLE 6ROVE MAIN STREET I:( DELRA y BEACH'S MAIN STREET PROGRAM . ~__. u__ .__ __ -- . - .-- --.-- - - ~---. - Promotion I · Special Events i I · Retail Events , I I I I · Image Enhancement I I I I I i i i ! L--_ ~_.- ~-- ---- - - -, - --- - -- t iNt.APPLE 6RmfE MAiN STREET t:t DELRA y BEACH'S MAIN STREET PROGRAM , , . ~, - . ------. , - -.. - -----. Design · Design education and technical assistance · Financial assistance and incentives I I · Public improvements i (streetscapes/open spaces) I · Regulations and enforcement ¡ _ ~___~__~~__~_n ~_~~~~ _ __~~.~~_~ ~_ ~_ ~.~__ , ,~ ~~n~~ _ _ _ ~_ ~_~__ _,~ ~_~ ,~_____ PINEAPPLE 6RmfE MAIN STREET J:1 DELRA y BEACH'S MAIN STREET PROCRAM , .---- - _.- .-.----..- ..- .- , ! Econom icRestructuri ng , · Existing building and ; business inventory · Market Analysis . · Business retention and strengthen i ng · New business recruitment I; 1 I :.~ ~,>~. , ; ;' I I I I L-- ....-. , -. - .", . _ n u_ _ _ _H' n _ _ PINEAPPLE 6ItO\'E MAIN STREET tt DELRA y BEACH'S MAIN STREET PROGRAM , , . PINEAPPLE GROVE MAIN STREET PRESIDENT JIM STAHL Organizational Structure Chart 1 VICE PRESIDENT r- - - - - - - - -. SUSAN BROWN · EXECUTIVE · COMMITTEE -. · [ALSOINCI.œ6~c.-¡ · SECRETARY [SUSAN BROWN) TREASURER JOHN MCKENNA p- - - - - - - - - -. ADVISORY BOARD 1 'OrHERORCANIZATlON I [CHAIR) I LIAISON COMMITTEE I [CHAaT 2) . p_ - - - _1- _ _ _ _. I FUNDRAISING I BOARD Of I DIRECTORS - [MICHAEL WEINER) p- - - - - - - - -. I I . -: OUTREACH COMMITTEE I I Cow.ilNcA"ßCJ18 PROCRAM MANAGER · M9.øRst.. [INDIVIDUAL) [INDIVIDUAL) OLLNIIIRCooRoNAli lfADIRsttp DMioPMENr [INDIVIDUAL) -. ·i PROMOTION COMMITTEE I--- [CHAIR) [CIWITS 3 .. 41 DESIGN COMMITTEE i--- [CHAIR) [CIWITS 3 .. 5) EcoNowc~ '---- [CHAIR) . [0NtS 3 .. 6 'The name reflected in connection with a committee reDresents the committee's chair. . , . . PINEAPPLE 6ROVE MAIN STREET Organizational Structure Chart 2 CITY OF r-- DELRAY BEACH DELRA Y BEACH I--- û-lAMsER OF COMMERCE HISTORIC - PAlM BEACH COUNTY PREsERvATION 8oARo p- - - - - -.. - --. I PINEAPPlE GROVE I OTHER ORCANIZATION SUPPORT GROUP! I LIAISONS I BANKERS' Row . OLD I ~ SCHOOL SQUARE COMMUNITY - REDEVELOPMENT ACENCY DOWNTOWN - DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY , l PINEAPPLE GROVE MAIN STREET Organizational Structure Chart 3 SPECIAL EVENTS I ~Cow.mŒ I - [CHAIR] RETAIL EVENTS ['l] I (~4J I ~ IMAGE ENHANCEMENT I DESIGN EDUCA TlONfT ECHNICAL ASSISTANCE I p- - - - - - - - - -. ~ I I DeilGNCow.mŒ FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AND INCENTIVES I BOARD OF I DIRECTORS [CHAIR] ~ I (~SJ ~ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTs/OPEN SPACES I .. - ~ REGULATIONS & ENFORCEMENT I BUILDING & BUSINESS INVENTORY I EcoNo-.tc~ ~ MARKET ANALYSIS - [CHAIR] --- (~6 ~ BUSINESS RETENTION & STRENGTHENING I ~ BUSINESS RECRUITMENT I . . . PIN£APPL£ GROVE MAIN STREET Organizational Structure Chart 4 -1 ORGANIZA nON COMMITTEE liAISON I -1 COMMUNITY GROUP(S) MEMBERS I SPECIAL EVENTS I SCHOOL LIAISON(S) I - [CHAIR] I H ClTIZEN(S) I Y STUDENT(S) I MERCHANT(S) I p- - - - - - - - --. H ADVERTISING SPECIALIST I I I PROMOTION RETAIL EVENTS I COMMITTEE [CHAIR] - I H I . CITIZEN(S) H STUDENT(S) I rl PUBLIC RELATIONS SPECIALIST I H ADVERTISING SPECIALIST I \~. H I TOURIST DEVELOPMENT liAISON '-- IMAGE ENHANCEMENT I DESIGN COMMITTEE liAISON I [CHAIR] I H GRAPHIC DESIGNER I H ClTlZEN(S) H STUDENT(S) I , . . PINEAPPLE GROVE MAIN STREET --1 ECONOMIC REsTRUCTURING COMMITTEE LIAISON I Organizational Structure --1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION SPECIALIST I Chart 5 --1 HISTORIC REsIDENTIAl ORGANIZATION LIAISON I .-- DESIGN EDUCATION/TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE I ARCHITECT I [CHAIR] I --1 INTERIOR DESIGNER I --1 SIGNAGE SPECIALIST I --1 DESIGN STUDENT(S) I ~ GRANT WRITER I FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AND INCENTIVES H BANKER (LOW INTEREST LOAN PROGRAM) I - - [CHAIR] H I p- ... - - -.. DISTRICT BUILDINclPROPERTY OWNER I DESIGN I ---' I COMMITTEE ~ HISTORIC REsIDENTIAl ORGANIZATION LIAISON L I ~ CaTY STAFF - PLANNING & ENGINEERING I - rUILlC IMPROVEMENTs/OPEN SPACES J- H 5PEcw. Puøoc PRoIECT ORGANIZATION LIAISON .. ';' ;-,j [CHAIR] ~t~< H T EOINICAL DESIGN LIAISON FROM SPEcIAL TAX HISTORIC RslDENTIAl ORGANIZATION L/AJSON I ~ CITY BOARD - ZONING/HISTORIC I - REGULATIONS & ENfORCEMENT I [CHAIR] I CaTY STAFF - ENFORCEMENT H CITIZEN(S) I , . PINEAPPLE GROVE MAIN STREET REAL TOR(s) Organizational Structure Chart 6 DISTRICT BUSINESS OwNER BUILDINC & BUSINESS INVENTORY [CHAIR) DISTRICT BUILDING/PROPERTY OwNER COLLECE STUDENT(S) MAaK£TINC SPECIALIST MAWOTHER DEVELOPER(S) MAUfT ANALYSIS R£PlØfNTATM Of l.ua 8U51N£SS£S [CHAIR) (NOT N£CI55AD.V IN DISTtICT) DISTlICT BUSINESS OwNER COlLEGE STUOENT(S) MARIŒTINC SPECIALIST r- - - - - - - - -. DISTlICT BUSINESS OwNER I ECONOMIC BUSINESS RfTENTlON & STRENCTHENINC I RESTRUCTURING [CHAIR) I PRoFIsstoNAL TRAINER I COMMITTEE . SftI::tAusrsfH VAIIIOUS BU5N55& ~ DtsoruNEs REAL TOR(s) CHAMBEII OF COMMRCf LIAISON MAuJOTHR DEVELOPERS CITY LIAISON MAaIŒTINC SPECIALIST BUSINESS RECRUITMENT [CHAIR} DISTRICT BUSINESS OwNER DISTlICT BUILDING/PROPERTY OwNER COLLEGE STUDENT(S) REPRESENTATIVE FROM LARCE BUSINESSES EVERYONE , , , I ' I I "Organization Buildout" I I · Identify stakeholders I · Understand and assign responsibilities : · Reach out to the · Plan activities carefully · Continuously search for ways !~fo involve new people ~~t':'" PINEAPPLE 6ROVE MAIN STREET XI DELRA y BEACH'S MAIN STREET PROGRAM . . . I -- - - --_. - Downtown Stakeholders · Business owners · Local media · Property owners · Y outh/schools · Residents · Financial institutions · Utilities · Churches · Hospitals · Chamber of Commerce · City government & police department · Historic preservation organizations · Downtown employees · Cultural institutions I · Service and community organizations · ~urroundingcommunities ,or.' - -.--- .. .. - _u .. _ .. .. .. {- .NE.\PPLE 6Ro\lE M/dH STREET t( DELRA y BEACH'S MAIN STREET PROGRAM , . - -' ,- -- ..,- " Taking Action on Main Street · Vision 1 · Objectives2 , · Mission1 · Activities2 I I I · Goals1 · Workplan2 .., 1 Board'~" 2Committees "':' -- .. ~ PINEAPPLE. GRoVE MAIN STREET J:( DELRA y BEACH'S MAl"" STREET PROCRAM , , I I ~ /, / ~l J I I ' I -;f' / N.L 51M CT. [ } ==.L ~_ DR. ./ . ~. ::- 1-::= ø¿J ~ ~ [" ~[ " ji( I ~ ~ lAKE IDA ROAI). H.E. r.. - - - 41H - - - ST. - - - . , ! @ @) @J ¡ ~ ~ . , ~ ~ I ~,c ~ ~ ,~ ~ Fe , ~ ~ ~ I ,IIDe ~ I , ~ WOO" C=-... ~ t T ...... · ~ ~ Q~ ~ ~ §: WI, :D I ~ 5 ¡'I NL :IMI n. --f ,'O'! IlL 21 ---.. ---, .-- - ----! i ~ ~ @ ~ I' ~ ~ I~ é a ð .. aTY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ð ! o ,~- III Z .... I , I Z LL. 1ST S.'/ 1ST ::::::! ~ ~ ~, ~ I t7 ¡p fc ~II ! ~ ~ = .'<¡V ~;J , Z z I , ~ ~ I , J: J: ~ . ~ TQIMS ...... '. II! ~ STAOAMJ J ~ I II I~ f~ ATl&1.1UTIC L-JD~~ ~R' A V E N U E : = r 'tDDD:;:7 r¡/DDC::JO~~ ..... 'j ~ I! == ~ ~ t- u.;:::j I t.==:. 1ST !!. _ _ :::=::. ~ t PINEAPPLE GROVE t CI~~::"FL MAIN STREET AREA -- D1GITM. IMSI' MAP SYS1ÐI -- , . . :¡¡ PINEAPPLE 6RO"£ MAIN STR££T, INC. Proposed Budget - Program Year 1 October 1, 1994 to September 30, 1995 Cash Amounts "In Kind" Total In Hand Pledged IQtal Contributions Funding INCOME Public Sector: City Commission $ - $ 30,000 $ 30.000 $ - $ 30,000 Joint Venture - - - 2,500 2,500 Community Redevelopment Agency· - 5,000 5.000 7,600 12,600 Downtown Development Authority· - 5.000 5.000 - 5.000 - 40,000 40,000 10,100 50,100 Private Sector: Fundraising - Founders/Sponsors - 10.000 10,000 - 10,000 Fundraising - Other - 3,500 3,500 - 3,500 Membership Dues - 2,000 2,000 - 2,000 Other - - - 4.000 4.000 Total Income $ - $ 55,500 $ 55.500 $ 14.100 $ 69.600 EXPENSES Salarj - Program Manager $ 30,000 $ - $ 30,000 Benefits - Program Manager 4,000 - 4,000 Salary & Benefits - Staff - 4,000 4,000 Travel 3,000 - 3,000 Advertising & Promotion - 2,500 2,500 Postage 800 - 800 Office Supplies 500 - 500 Office Expense o. o. - Printing/Photocopy - 2,000 2,000 Photographic Supplies - 500 500 Insurance 1.000 - 1,000 Rent - 3,000 3,000 Utilities ~, o. 300 300 mr'" T elephone~;:'t!'f::") . 1,200 - 1,200 ,;':;":f~,._~,-._'_-< Professional Dev~ - - - Answering Machi'~ ice - 300 300 Contingency - - - Professional - 1.500 1.500 Janitorial - - - Projects Budget 15,000 o. 15.000 Total Expenses $ 55.500 $ 14.100 $ 69,600 Net Surplus (Deficit) $ - $ - $ - 'Both the CRA and DDA are including. the pledges herein reflected in their respective 1994/1995 budgets being "workshoppedM as of the current date. Neither of the agencies will finalize its budget until September. 1994. . R~'d 7 / I~./ 91-( CD Community - Redevelopment -a Agency Delray Beach MEMO TO: City Commission City of Delray Beach FROM: Christopher J. Brown City Representative to the Palm Beach County Impact Fee Review Committee DATE: July 11, 1994 RE: Proposed Changes in Impact Fee The following summarizes changes recommended by the Impact Fee Review Committee and the· County's Economic Consultant: I. Economic Consultant's Recommendation A. Raise impact fees dramatically (see attached Table 2). B. Eliminated the distinction in general commercial retail between restaurants and other retail (see attachments). C. Add right-of-way costs to Fair Share road fees (20% of the total new fee). D. Add school buildings to school fee (significant increase; 86% of total new fee). n. Impact Fee Review Committee's Recommendation A. No limits on the number of years an existing use credit can be applied to redevelopment - currently 5 years. B. Review benefit zones; exempt or lower fees where growth not anticipated. C. Reimburse developers for excess fees paid or transferring credits or sell excess credits to other developments in the same zone, D. Encourage alternative methods of transportation, including mass transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. /d Attach. 207 E Atlantic Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33444 (407) 276-8640 / Fax (407) 276..8558 . Table 2 - Delray Beach Impact Fee Review Committee 1994 Impact Fee Recommendations (examples) 1994 % Change Current Methodology IFRC Current Fee vs. Im,pact Fees Fee Costs Difference Rec. IFRC Ree. Office Rate for a 100,000 sf Per 1,000 sf Public Buildings $ 66.73 $ 70.87 $ 4.14 $ 66.73 0.00% Fire Rescue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Roads 771.65 2,426.00 1,654.35 809.00 4.84 Solid Waste 0.00 329.73 329.73 0.00 -- Law Enforcement 155.71 207.75 52.04 155.71 0.00 Law Enforcement Countywide ~ 0.00 (6.10) 0.00 -100.00 Total Per 1,000 sf $1,000.19 $3,034.35 $2,034.16 $1,031.44 3.10% Retail Rate for a 100,000 sf. Per 1,000 sf Public Buildings $ 131.45 $ 168.25 $ 36.80 $ 131.45 0.00% Fire Rescue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Roads 2,215.50 7,586.00 5,370.50 2,529.00 14.15 Solid Waste 0.00 329.73 329.73 0.00 -- Law Enforcement 155.71 207.75 52.04 155.71 0.00 Law Enforcement Countywide 11.07 0.00 (11.07) 0.00 -100.00 Total Per 1,000 sf $2,513.73 $8,291.73 $5,778.00 $2,816.16 12.50% Average Single Family Home (Delray Beach) ~ 1,400 - 1,999 sf Parks $ 185.36 $ 186.71 $ 1.35 $ 1.01 0.01% Libraries 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 School 356.01 743.00 386.99 646.25 81.53 Law Enforcement 79.14 105.59 26.45 79.14 0.00 Public Buildings 70.39 96.67 26.28 70.39 0.00 Fire Rescue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Roads 1,650.00 3,760.00 2,110.00 1,880.00 13.94 Solid Waste 0.00 314.71 314.71 0.00 -- Law Enforcement Countywide 6.67 0.00 (6.67) 0.00 -100.00 Total $2,347.57 $5,206.68 $2,859.11 $2,676.79 14.02% . , . C(/P.R,£N1' FÉé- AR77CU 10. IMPACT fl'US Sec. 10.' Føir SIuI,. RtHIIIlmDtlct F~~( ( TABLE 10,8-1 FAIR SHARE ROAD IMPACf FEE SCHEDULE . omclAL DAILY TRIP PASS-BY TRIP TYPE OF LAND GENERATION RATE PER RATE FEE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY DWELLING UNIT OR AREA (pERCENT AGEe) DR 1NI' Residential: Single family detached .. 10/du $ 1.650.00 Attached housinS 7/du 1,155,00 Congregate Uvin¡ Facility 2. I 45/du 353.93 Mobile Home '1-. 5/du 825,00 Nonresidential: ' ," ~ Drive-in Bank 265.2111000 lei. ft. 46~ 7,876.74 Mini-Warehouse . 2.61/1000 sq. ft. O~ 143.55 Hotel 8.7 TripslRoom .~. -..- O~ 478.50 Movie Theater 1.76 Trips/Seat O~ 96.80 -::- , r Racquet Club 42.9 Trips/Court O~ 2,359.50~ ChurchlSynago¡ue 9,32 Trips/l000 sq. ft. O~ ~12.6Ol 79.26/1000 sq. ft. 10~ 3,923.37· 96.51/1000 sq. ft. 15~ 4,511.84 205,36/1000 sq. ft. 15~ 9,600,58 (, 47.97/1000 sq. ft. O~ 2,638.35 General Office (Examples)" 10,000 sq, ft. 24,6 Trips/tOOO lei. ft. O~ 1,353.00 50,000 sq. ft. 16.58 Trips/l000 lei. ft. O~ 911.90 100,000, sq. ft. 14.03 Trips/l000 lei. ft. O~ 771,65 150,000 sq. ft. 12.71 Tripsl1000 lei. ft. O~ 699.05 200,000 sq. ft. 11.85 Trips/l000 lei. .ft. O~ 651.75 300,000 lei. ft. 10.77 Trips/tOOO lei. ft. O~ 592.35 400,000 sq. ft. 9.96 Tripl/1000 lei. ft. O~ 547.80 500.000 sq. ft. 9.45 Trips/l000 sq. ft. O~ 519.75 600,000 sq~ ft. . 9.05 Tripl/l000 lei. ft. O~ 497.75 . 700.000 sq. ft.:: :.,.-. '. 8.75 Trips/l000 sq. ft. O~ 481,25 8oo.000.sq, tG. 'C~C 8.46 Trips/l000 sq. ft. O~ 465.30 Office bUil~inl. ~. . 34.17/1000 sq. ft. O~ 1,879,35 HC":'iw, per beet . 11,77 O~ 647,35 Nu"Sing Home. per bed 2.6 ..... O~ 143.00 Warehouse (per 1,000 lei. ft.) 4.88/1000 sq. ft. 0" 268.40 Motel, per room 10.19 O~ 560.45 General recreation. per parkin~ space 3 -O~ 165.00 '. - I UND DEVELOPMENT COD~ PALM MACH COUNrI, FLORIDA " . dDOP'ŒD JUNE 16, 1992 PAGC 1Q;SO . , / fttlfoJEP Ft:£ TABLE 30 ROAD NEEDS AND COSTS BY LAND USE TYPE PALM BEACH COUNTY AVG. % TRIP TRIP NEW NEW LAND USE TYPE (UNIT) RATE LENGTH TRIPS ROADS RESIDENTIAL; Single Family Detached 10.00 6 100.0% 0.00400 Attached Housing 7.00 6 100.0% 0.00280 Congregate Living 2.15 6 100.0% 0.00086 Mobile Home 5.00 6 100.0% 0.00200 NON-RESIDENTIAL; HOTEL PER ROOM 8.70 3 85.0% 0.00148 MOTEL PER ROOM 10.19 3 85.0% 0.00173 CHURCH/SYNAGOGUE PER 1,000 FT2 9.32 3 100.0% 0.00186 DAY CARE CENTER PER 1,000 FT2 79.26 3 50.0% 0.00793 GENERAL OFFICE PER 1,000 FT2 - EXAMPLES: 50,000 FT2 16.62 3 92.0\ 0.00306 75,000 FT2 15.05 3 92.0\ 0.00277 100,000 FT2 14.03 3 92.0\ 0.00258 150,000 FT2 12.71 3 92 . 0% 0.00234 200,000 FT2 11. 85 3 92.0\ 0.00218 400,000 FT2 10.00 3 92.0\ 0.00184 500,000 FT2 9.47 3 92.0\ 0.00174 600,000 FT2 9.06 3 92.0\ 0.00167 700,000 FT2 8.73 3 92.0\ 0.00161 800,000 FT2 8.45 3 92.0\ 0.00155 MEDICAL BUILDINGS: MEDICAL OFFICES PER 1,000 FT2 34.17 3 92.0\ 0.00629 HOSPITALS PER 1,000 FT2 16.78 3 92.0% 0.00309 NURSING HOME PER.1,000 FT2 3.68 3 92.0\ 0.00068 INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS: GEN. INDUSTRIAL PER 1,000 FT2 6.97 3 92.0\ 0.00128 ) WAREHOUSING PER 1,000 FT2 4.88 3 92.0\ 0.00090 GENERAL COMMERCIAL RETAIL PER 1,000 FT2 - EXAMPLES; 50,000 FT2 91. 65 3 56.0\ 0.01026 75,000 FT2 78.72 3 56.6\ 0.00891 100,000 FT2 70.67 3 57.1\ 0.00807 200,000 FT2 60.70 3 59.4\ 0.00721 300,000 FT2 54.50 3 61. 6\ 0.00671 400,000 FT2 42.02 3 63.9% 0.00537 500,000 FT2 38.00 3 66.1% 0.00502 600,000 FT2 36.35 3 68.4\ 0.00497 800,000 FT2 33.88 3 72.9% 0.00494 1,000,000 FT2 32.09 3 77 . 4\ 0.00497 1,200,000 FT2 30.10 3 81. 9% 0.00493 1,400,000 FT2 29.56 3 86.4\ 0.00511 1,600,000 FT2 28.61 3 90.9% 0.00520 SERVICE STATION PER PUMP 164.11 1.5 42.0\ 0.00689 CONVENIENCE RETAIL/FAST FOOD 737.99 1.5 25.0\ 0.01845 SOURCE: Palm Beach County Engineering Department and Institute of Transportation Engineers, TRIP GENERATION, 5th Edition, 1991. NOTES: (1) The office and commercial retail rates shown and only examples. The actual trip rates for these land uses will be determined by the following formulae: 45 ~~-...-=.r:.~;... . .....,..,...... "--," ";"_-:-"""":"'~:.t:'"'J::---'- h ........~._' '--. _...... - _. .~. ~. .~ "' ' --- ...--""- . '.' ~~w_.··· _ 6/;>'4 I'lL¡ c1r-L{ Lú'Lk {' G( l.uJ -L( ~ CD Community , ~lÎì l.U::J¡Je 5R :;. ~\ b (Ì, t) Redevelopment -a Agency Delray Beach June 23, 1994 A£C£/IJ£D JlJN 2 j Mr. David Harden CITy MAN 1994 AI'I£¡ City Manager R~~ {)FFICi City of Delray Beach 100 NW 1st Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 RE: Palm Beach County Impact Fee Review Committee's Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners on Proposed New Impact Fees Dear Dave: As the City of Delray Beach's delegate to the Impact Fee Review Committee, please find enclosed a complete report and a summary report. Please note the following items that were recommended relative to Delray Beach's interests: 1. Finding No.3: Eliminate the 5-year time limitation on existing use credits. 2. Finding No.4: Review the "benefit zones" and the need for impact fees in areas which have little growth or need for road widening. 3. Finding No. 14: Limit the increase in fees in order to prevent a disincentive for new development and redevelopment. If you would like to briefly discuss the recommendations in a City Commission workshop, I would be available. The Board of County Commissioners has scheduled a workshop on June 28, 1994 discuss the Committee's recommendations. yours, opher J. Brown Executive Director /d Enclosure '#..5 ¿ 207 E. Atlantic Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33444 (407) 276-8640 I Fax (407) 276-8558 .11 ' Agenda Item # .fñ)œ r;;)f;:J (" " ·._U~::1 r J~", ' , " , PALM BEACH COUNTY O¡·c.UU!JJ..t:lii1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS .', l ~.f ¡ a "um::: t 1qa~ .if! I WORKSHOP SUMMARY (:' :F,; ===========~:;:~=1================================================== l,lC7Ke~éti.ng Dat;~.:¡ij jJune 28, 1994 .-.-.Dep.a;~11I.ent:"'· . Office of Financial Management & Budget __________J______________________________________________________ -------------~--------------------------------------------------- .p I. Executive Brief A. Title: 1994 Update and Expansion of Impact Fee Meth9do1ogy B. Summary: Article 10.1.E.5 of the Unified Land Development Code requires a biennial update to the impact fee schedule. This workshop will address the update of Palm Beach County Impact Fees Methodology. The update proposes a change in the method used to calculate the road impact fee, and adds a rights-of-way component to this fee. ,A new facilities cost component is being added to the ~chool land acquisition impact fee. In addition, a new solid waste impact fee is being proposed as provided for in the County charter~ These changes account for a significant portion of the increase in impact fees. The remaining increases reflect the fact that costs of providing capital facilities for which impact fees are assessed have not been updated since FY 1~88-89. Furthermore, ad valorem and grant funding for impact fee types of capital facilities have decreased, resulting in a reduction of past and future credits against the actual costs of providing these facilities. Staff is seeking direction from the Board of County Commissioners regarding the acceptance of the 1994 Technical Memorandum of the Methods Used to Calculate and Update Impact Fees and if so, at what revel the propo~ed fees should be imposed. Attachment 1 provides a number of suggested options the Board may consider when determining the level of possible new fees. (Countywide) C. Baokqround and Justification: The impact fee updåte was performed by Dr. James C. Nicholas, Consultant, a professQr with the University of Florida. Dr. Nicholas is an expert in the field of impact fees. The final draft of his report was completed in May, 1994 (see attachment 2). Palm Beach County's Impact Fee Review Committee has been involved extensiVe~in the update of the impact fees. The Committee consists \ ~'. ~... 4 Municipal Representatives, 3 Business Represent ,~~.s, 3 Representatives At Large, 1 Member of the Impact Fee Appeal'~:aøard and the Impact Fee Coordinator. The Impact Fee Review Committee's semi-annual report to the BCC includes recommenda~ions reqarding the update, of impact fees. This report is a companion item for today's workshop. Upon receiving BCC approval to proc~d with the updàte of impact fees, staff will prepare the appropriate impact fee schedules and begin the process of amending Article 10 o~the ULDC. Staff will continue to meet with community organizations to receive additional pUblic input prior to amending Article 10. (continued on paqe 3) D. A.ttaohments: 1. Options for proposed Impact Fee Increases ' 2. Copy of Technical Memorandum On The Methods Used to Calculate and Update Impact Fees, Palm Beach county, Florida, May 1994 3. Analysis of Impaét Fee Schedules 4. Analysis of Impact Fee Increases/Decreases 5. compa~sons of Impact Fees with Comparable Counties (Average Single Family Unit) . 6. community Park Methodology 7. Mass Transit Memorandum ----=~=------------- :::::::::::=:::===---===-~~~- ------~--~-q~ Department Oirector L2~ Approved By;: Assistant County Administrator Date J. , I ¡ , , II. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. Five Year Summary of Fiscal Impact: .. Fiscal YearJ 19!,L 19.tL 19iL 19!1.- 19l1.... Capital Expénditures 0 --º-- 0 0 0 Operating Costs 0 --º-- 0 0 0 operating Revenues 0 --º-- 0 0 0 Is Item Included In Current Budget? Yes No~ Budget Account No.: Fund___ Agency___ org____ object____ Reporting Category____ B. Recommended Sources of Funds/summary of Fiscal Impact: , There is a potential fiscal impact if fees are incJ;'eased. The exact fiscal impact cannot be determined until the BCC gives direction on whether the updated methodology will be accepted and if so, at what level the new fees will be imposed. III. REVIBW COHHENTS A. OFHB Fiscal and/or contraot Administration Comments: ¡j~ t!.~ OFMB B. '. C. other Department aeview: "'--.., . Department Direoto. . It Revised 02/92 ADM FORK 01 (This summary is not to be used as a basis for payment) ; 2 J " I' ¡ . '! , Continued From Page 1 Staff is sensitive to the potential adverse economic impact an increase in impact fees may present at this time. However, the fees have not been adjusted since FY 1988-1989 and the actual cost of providing these facilities have increased over the years. If the increas~d costs are not addressed and impact fees amended the County may"be forced to adjust for a revenue shortfall in the future. .~ The BCC has also requested that staff analyze impact fees and their relationship to other stated BCC priorities - Affordable Rousing, Economic Development, Community Parks and Mass Transit. Affordable Rousing: The County does support affordable housing and redevelopment of the coastal areas. However, impact fees cannot be waived for these types of programs or any other types of development. There are a number of mechanisms in place at this time to address affordable housing and business redevelopment. Currently, Article 10.1 of the ULDC provides for existing use credits for replacement· structures. If the original structure has been in use within the last five years and there is no increase in square footage or no additional impact, the replacement structure would not be required to pay impact fees. In addition, an eligible affordable housing unit or project's impact fees can be funded out of the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. In order to more efficiently utilize these fees if a project or unit is located within a municipality or CRA, the County could consider requiring those governmental units to match the County resources used to pay impact fees. The affordable housing trust fund fees could be used to pay 50% of the County impact fee and the appropriate Municipality/Community. Redevelopment Area could pay the remaining 50% of the impact fees. An affordable housing project also has the option of conducting an independent calculation to determine its actual impact, potentially reducing the required impact fee (s). The owner must be willing to deed restrict the property to the approved land use identified in the calculation. Boonomio Development: The existing use credit provision would also be applicable to non- resident~development specifically in redevelopment areas. County f .. ··M1ave been identified for economic development and a portion c,:., . be used to pay impact fees for eligible projects. The econ" ·";development funds could also be used as impact fee match fundlnq for projects located within CRAs or Municipalities. Where appliEable, independent calcul~tions may also be applied when approved by the County for non-residential development. community Parks: At the BCC workshop in June, 1993 the Board directed staff to have the consultant address the possibility of..~ community park impact fee. The consultant addressed this possibility and recommended a community park impact fee for the unincorporated area. These fees were not included in the update but are reflected in attachment 6, if the Board desires to pursUe this issue. The Charter currently allows for district, regional and beach parks only. A charter amendment would be required in order for this impact fee to be effective countywide, or the community park impact fee could be adopted by a separate ordinance being effective only in the Unincorporated area. '-The .Consultant states in the community park methodology' that community parks are a municipal function. There are several~uniciPalities within Palm Beach County that currently assess a re eational impact fee. County park impact fees cannot be used for municipally owned parks. Mass Transit The Board also instructed staff to review whether impact fees could be used for mass transit. currently, the chart~r does not provide for a separate mass transit impact fee. Road impact fees may be used under certain circumstances to fund mass transi t capital improvement~ that result in a decrease in road usage. Use of road impact fees will significantly reduce resources available for the county's rOr~ program (see attachment 7). I \ ¡ 3 , , ATTACHMENT 1 ~ '~ð1~æ'g'c~ ...~ en ~ rrcn:D"'''' "':D -oj rrcnð1'T1'" l~ i ¡ 0 3' 12~¡¡6: ~~ Q ··0 "1'& £ ~=Q CD!l~::rq- 8~ [ s ~~ä:!CD_ m a. a. :D -. m 0 ! IQ .. !. ...() 'tI ~ <II II () 0 It¡ i' ~~~.i'ñ . - - mm~lII:Dñ . CD · a. "CJa.-<D·~ '"tJ sf '"tJ §f () o CD () 0 <II 'TI . :-q-: ~ ~ ~ ~~: ~ ~ m .. ¡ ()~ i~'" ëô~ III ... ~ ." ! OeD a.() $c[ ª- .. §£i ig; ;:::. ... &'()- - :=. · I: -. II 0.. ó' II II Q. 0.. ." : a ð ~ -< Q 3 :I '0 1:3 :I $I ~ ~ :=CD 8 1eD 0 ... 8 a. IC 1 "a ON ." ¡ a III > 1a III > ~ ... . - 0: ª. ¡: i - - 8 ,.. 8 .. .. .. CD ~ -< 3' ~ ~ J: 0 c 3 III := m = CD '.. "N 'C en .. ~ :I () 0 i ~ () ~ ¡ ~ . ~ II: - !. I\) .. ~ "0 ÙI Q · ÕI W eft > .. N .. ; ::iUlI ~ ~ g( ....,....,~g;- ¡ I I" g: - ( w ~ ~ .. ~ !" ? ~?!D. " !" .!. ~ S~~~~~ left UI 0 .. ...., "II ~888~.5!ti~ - ~~8~~~ I ØI m ." ª Æ ..z ~ : : ~ IOi "0 w W ...., ~ I\) ~d2 rr w~ -....,1\).... I? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w. .... -81O:§:o~-~ ØI 2 ~§g ~ I~ ; 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; - ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ &.õ w ~ 8ù1ë::8~~ ~ 8ù1ë::8i~ Sc:- g; N . ;¡ .. "0 1'& ... I:&. i- :7'i UI w .... ...., N I\) ¡;i &.1 ...... ~~0I108~8~ i -W~ - ! -wi st.! ØI co- OIUI ? ~ ~. ~ ~ "f8 o "II co I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ 10 ...., w UI co .... ~ ... 8~~~2f :.. ~ON !!II tit N 8~.~~t: I., c- .. 1~ ti · i . UI w ...., œ I\) I\) .....¡ -.. ~~~OIcoI8~ ! -ï~ - ~ I¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !~c& ( ) I? ~. ~ ~ ~ ~!i!¡ UI !? ~ ~. ~?'. . ~ ¡g 8~8~8s~~a :... 8løta~ti 0 w - lœa2ò1 . Z c.! "0 II: ;¡ . .. ØI N .. ..t1i 8: I\) ~ UI ~ lat Nœ( )........,g:-~ -1\)) - -I\)œ .. .. O~~IOI\)CO....,g;1\) UI og:~ ~~ ØI o8:~;gt: ~!i!8 ! 8B8~g~~8:8 ! 8~~g:~ ~ 8~~g!; sgc.! II: ;¡ W .. ... .. ¡Ii 8 - . (oJ 8: -§ w-w ... ........ _.oN ØI o~ $;~~~8~ 8 oS~8t~ ... os~wt:~ ~!i!~ . I 8~8~~!g~~ I 81~8~~ ... 81~8~t 1.1" N II: ;¡ it ~ .......i .. IUI ÙI .. ~ ....~I\)I\) ;UI; i o~~.~~ o~~§;~ ..at .. ~!i!¡ ØI OOlOW~~UtI\)"'" UI UI ~ 88!8~~~~~t: ê. 8~tSis:8 I 8~tg~~ . It UI ... -0 II: ¡ J. , i . I ! . . ~-)~CHMENT 4 FACTORS AFFECTING t PROPOSED IMPACT FEE INCREASES PARK IMPACT FEE PARK IMPROVEMENT COSTS INCREASED OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS BY 50% PAST PAYMENT CREDITS FOR AD VALOREM FUNDS DECREASED PROM 7.8% TO 4.7% ì STATE GRANT CREDIT DECREASED FROM 17.1% TO 8.33% LIBRARY IMPACT FEE LIBRARY MATERIALS AND BUILDING COST PER CAPITA INCREASED OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS BY 56% SPECIAL LIBRARY TAX CREDIT APPLICABLE IN 1989 IS NO LONGER AN ELIGIBLE CREDIT, RESULTING IN A CREDIT REDUCTION OF $42.52 STATE GRANT CREDIT DECREASED FROM $1.5 MILLION TO $.6 MILLION SCHOOL IMPACT FEE SCHOOL FACILITY COSTS ARE BEING ADDED TO LAND ACQUISITION IMPACT FEE LAW ENFORCEMENT COUNTYWIDE IMPACT FEE (FEE PROPOSED TO BE ELIMINATED) BOND AND PAST PAYMENT CREDITS WERE SUFFICIENT TO COVER THE COSTS OF PROVIDING THIS SERVICE LAW ENFORCEMENT PATROL IXPACT FEE PAST PAYMENT CREDIT FROM AD VALOREM FUNDS DECREASED FROM 7.8% TO 4.7% THE C~TS PER CALL INCREASED FROM $98.22 TO $120.44 DUE TO OT R ELIGIBLE COSTS BEING ACCOUNTED FOR UNDER THIS FEE AND HIGHER COSTS OF SOPHISTICATED ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT . ! I \ I PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE t COSTS PER CAPITA INCREASED DUE TO HIGHER PUBLIC FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION COSTS PAST PAYMENT CREDIT FROM AD VALOREM FUNDS DECREASED FROM 7.8% TO 4.7% BOND CREDITS INCREASED FOR PUBLIC BUILDINGS FROM $60.35 TO $360.48 TO OFFSET COSTS OF EXCESS SQUARE FOOTAGE 'OF NEW FACILITIES NOT CURRENTLY IN USE i FIRE RESCUE IMPACT FEE PAST PAYMENT CREDIT FROM AD VALOREM FUNDS DECREASED FROM 7.8% TO 4.7% CAPITAL COSTS INCREASED BY 18% DUE TO THE HIGHER VALUE OF FIRE RESCUE CAPITAL FACILITIES ROADS IMPACT FEE RIGHT OF WAY COSTS BEING ADDED TO ROAD IMPACT FEE (20.3% OF THE PROPOSED INCREASE) CONSTRÙCTION COSTS PER LANE MILE INCREASED FROM $825,000 TO $1,101,287 (33.5% INCREASE) APPLIED TOTAL TRIP LENGTH TO LAND USES AS OPPO~ED TO CURRENT METHOD BEING APPLIED SOLID WASTE IMPACT FEE NEW SOLID WASTE IMPACT FEE BEING ADDED TO THE IMPACT FEE SYSTEM l # ! . A1 TACH ENT 5 'rz. -t C/I r- ;p r- :!1 "C C/I JJ ~ ; oz 0 Q. II 5' ìD \I 9- ~ ~ . -to ¡ ö: ~ sz: ~ ;. "C ~-t -- 0 > ~ \ CD~ III :iE g' õ' CD' ~ 3" It ("') Q CD 1/1 1/1 3 -t I Õ ... \I S. e "C 3" "C CJ 1/1 ;- \I " I ~ (¡;) i 0 ã: " !l "C II m m I \I \0 " ,. "C 1\1 !l m en ~ bo 3" 3 II 3" " 0 0.3: cQ " - " -t " !l z "C ::I 1/1 "C " ;r :E -( ("') " \I - 3" ;r II "C CJ g ~ !l 3" !l " m roo 3.8- " " cr. m " " III if '< 0 <11 III !l "T1 <11 !l > c: - " 1/1 t8 " " !: ~'< " " r= III C " -( ::;-X J: 3 !!. "C 0 en <11 !: "C 0. ("')¡e m .' Q ("') .. 03: ~ g C7I '0 Co) Cm ì õ' ;¡ ..¡ I; ... N ..¡ ..¡ :.,¡ ~m 0 co ... co . . 0) ::I ~ <11 C7I ... N co Co) 0 -(> 3 (,) in 01 <11 :e.. ~ g g ("') ! 8- N co ..¡ . (II (,) J: " .. " " " .. " " " !2. Õ "C 1/1 ("')¡e !2. .. \I N ... 03: g iø 0) (,) m cm N (II ..., <11 (II <11 <11 ~m 0. ? I~ <11 !=' (II (,) ~ 0) 0 -(:Þ 3' ~ Co (,) :e.. (, ..¡ (, g ("') ... co (,) (,) ... ... J: " ~ ¡¡¡ ("') !D ("')m 0 -i .. oJJ !: ::r ~ ... cO 'U C1) 0 (,) fD (II ~~ > II ~ (,) 0 0 ¡e < I~ 0 0 0 0 . N 0 'JJ C1) 8 8 g 8 g g g g -<0 (/) ; 0 co " Z CD " (/) g 0 0. ." 3' .. ("')3: ("') N 0:Þ 0 III ÔI c~ "C (,) ... ..¡ .þ, co !: !l <11 N co 0 (II N N ~- 'U . I~ 0 $11 . ~ ~ 0 <11 -<z > ¡¡¡ N g ... (, <11 8: g g JJ C1) co 0) <11 0 > Q aI J: roo 3 ("');= m III .. ("') < N o~ .0 C1) ÔI ... CaI c: ; bo ... io ~o co ... . N co .þ, ~ C1) N I~ 0 0 0 (II ... <11 0) -(~ 1/1 N g g (, 01 01 io g C ñi ~. co 0 0) (II <11 CJ (/) IQ. J: " [ - '< ("')0 c: .. ::I N OJJ ÔI ... c:Þ iii' ... 0 ~ ~~ 1 N A <11 <11 ~ foOt .,. I~ !'I 0 0 ~ 0 ..¡ -<m (II :.... g g g in 01 8 ... A Ut 0 0) 0 CO ~ C/) - .. (",):Þ CoO OJJ è.t N c::Þ ... ... (,) ÙI ~~ 0 <11 ..., CO c: CoO I~ 0 0 ..¡ 0) N 0 8 g g 8 (, 8 g 8 -<:Þ 0 .. 0("') ... ... ~~ CO ~ :Þ-< ~ ..., Zo 0 A I~ 0 0 0 0 0 <11 CO 0" 8 g 8 g 8 8 8 8 0 . p!"f1 1 ø '94 æ: 57 JAMES N ¡ Q-O..AS 9344723699 TO: 407 233 502Ø P1e . .AT rAC~MËNl 6 II. COWMUNITY PARK IUPACT FEES Th. Board requelted . Community Park I~paot Fel. Suoh a fa. follows for the unincorporated are.. Thi' f.. ia presented for the unincor/¡oratad are~ only b.eau.e cOllWllunity park. tYpically art ...n u a munioipal function. herefore, convnunlty park·, . with1n incorporated ara.. aro ltft to the diaoretion of the mun101pal1tie.. " COWUUN1TY PARK IUPACT FEES In Palm Seach County parka art div1ded into two genoral ïroUPin~.. lTh. fir.t ïrouPlng art tho,. park and recreational ar.. that ..rve countyw d, nt. I. Thi. group neludes dlatr1ct, regional and beach larks and r.croation.l ar.... Thl.e'parke ara addrt.,.d by the current park impaot ... Th. ..cand gen.ral grOY11ng of ~.rk. are cOMunlty park and reoreational areas. These fac1l1t1t1 urva loo.Uunllda. COMunity parka 1nclud. nai¡hborhOod park.. COMun1ty parka are typioally 'Mall. cOlI'IInonly 25 Icr.. or leu. COI'IW'IIUn1 y typI park. are generally cla"Uhd .. a tllUn101pal funoUonand IIItny of the /llUn1oipal1ti.. within the oountr have .ddr....d their c1t1:zen. neeel. for· the.. park,. PruuIII.bly. thou ~un101p.l1t .. ~hlt do not prov1dt oOlllllun1ty ~.rk. haY. determined th.t their cit1Ion. do not "e.d o~un1tl type p.rk~ or that IUO nttda ar. ..et by other ....n.. Tht cOllllllunity parkaanalya ,contain herdn Iddres... thl uninoorporated aria of the oounty. . Table . thoWI tho ne.da for and OOS~I of oommunity p'arkl by re.idtnt1al land UII. The park and recr.at1onal fao1lit!t. and are.a Rddr....d her.in ara only tho.. that ar. oommunity park I with1n the uninOOrpor&ted ar... In r.~n1ticn of the fact that many of tht hotll. and .ctel, in Palm Beaoh County art occup1' by tranei.nte, the funotional populat10n tor hot.l, and Mot,la for ,the - .~: purpolo. of co~nlty park. 1. reduoed by 50\. All ovutand1nî dlbt was allocaUd to. the Qoun~ ·wide park and reore..tionaltYtttlll and. thua no.debt .1 ocat1on rem«1n. to·b. addre.., for communi1y park.. . ~ TABl.E . COMUUNITY PARKS AND RECRfATIONAl PARAMETERS PALM BeACH COUNTY 8T ANQAADI: A. CURRENT INVENTORY OF COMWNITY PARK ACREAGE; ACRUQE COI.IMUNITY PARKS TOTAL AREA 387.9 IMPROVED MEA 177.4 UNINOOAPORAT!D AReA POPULATION 437,790 PE" 1tooO POPULATION TO AL MEA. 0.8<40 IMPROVED AREA 0,<405 SOURCE: Pal. S.ach County, Park. and Reor.ation Oepartment, March 2", 1~94. B. STANDARDS \OR: COUWNITY PARKS TOTAL. AREA 0.840 Per 1,000 I"'PROVED AREA 0.405 Pe,. 1,000 , '. . ". .. .. 11 \ -.. .--. ,_..~.._...._. ..-. ... .-. AP'~ 'là '94 09:57 J~ NIQQ.AS 9Ø44723699 TO: 407 233 5Ø20 P1t I t C. CAP IT AL COSTS: PROVISION ,COST COST ITEW(ITEU PER 1,000 PER ACRE PER CAPITA ACRES 0,8<40 ':SO,OOO U2.00 IIoIPAOVEUENTS 0..05 '80,340 '2".+4 TOTA~ 188.« '. ThQ formula for calculating the community park, impact f.. 11: COST PER UNIT . ~POPULATION PER UNIT x ~ACQUISITION COST PER ì CAPITA + IW ROVEYENT COST PER CAPI ^>1 x (1 . 0.047 > CREDITS . $0.00 X POPULATION PER UNIT NET OOST · COST PER UNIT . CREDITS TABLf .. COMMUNITY PARKS AND RECREATION NEEDS AND COSTS BY LAND USE TYPE UNINCORPORATED AREA PERSONS COST LAHD US! TYPE fUNIT~ peR UNIT PEA UNIT CREDITS NET COST RESIDENTIAL ,UN TS B SIZE 800 F..t and Under 1.840 $103.84 $0 .00 $103.84 801 . 1,3;; 2.000 $126.63 $0.00 $124.43 1 . ~O . 1, 9g0 ~.517 $159.~7 SO.OO $159.31 2,000 . 3,5g9 S.OS4 $192.10 $0.00 $192.10 3,eoO and Ovtr :1.832 $2.2.63 $0.00 $2<42. M Houl/Wottl 0.875 $55.<40 $0,00 $55 . <40 HOTE: Hottl/aottl ooouplnoy It 60~ of actu.l in this I"d lubl.qulnt park tabl... ' t ~ ~ 11 \ . . __._0_- -. ..-. ... , APr. 1 a I 94 Ø9: 58 JAMES N r oo....AS 9a44723699 TO: 4Ø7 233 5e2e P12 ! A-r1 ACHM~NT 7 III. LIAS! TRANSIT Th. 1988 amendment. to the County Charter did "ot add rea a Mae, trane1t. ThuI, i1 a ..parat. ma.. transit impact 1.e were to be de,ired, it May þave.to b. oon11n8ô to the uninoorporated area. ^n alternativl would bt & further amendment to the Cha~er. Th. count~ mali wiah to oonsider making ~... tran.it an authorizod use Qf Aoad hpact F.... f his were to be impleMented. only thou man transit oapital 1~reveMtnt. that resulted 1n a dacre.s. in road ulag.. and therefore an iner.a.. in available road capAc 1. ty would b. el1p1blo oxpend1 ture 01' Road Impact F.... Hilleborough county uae. this approach, It i, a 10 ulad outeid' of Florida 1n larg.r metropoLitan ...r.... 1 '. t - .. . 13 ., - ".. . - , . , ' I . ;,æ "~ .):~ .,..\ "." f -....------------ { PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE REVIEW COMMlTfEE . f I { REPORT TO PALM BEACH COUNTY 1 BOARD OF COUNTY I (REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 4 . ,'PALM BEACH COUNTY UNIFIED LAND I t ~1 l f .. L , ;. 1 [ L' June 28, 1994 L t '. ,,~ '. l I . "1 . \ INTRODUCTION The county's impact fee system assesses the fees in the unincorporated area and all 37 municipalities. This revenue source is a major vehicle for funding the various capital facilities which the county provides. Table 1 shows the revenues produced by the various fees for four fiscal years, with the exception of the road impact fee. The road impact fee was implemented in 1979. TABLE 1 I 'j' IMPACT FEE REVENUE PALM BEACH COUNTY ($000) I FY89-90 FY90-91 FY91-92 FY92-93 TOTAL I I ROADS * 14,769 10,965 15,772 10,895 52,401 \ PARKS 2,934 3,580 4,111 5,151 15,776 i SCHOOLS 0 4 , 400 2 , 349 3 , 228 9 , 977 PUBLIC BUILDINGS 708 764 797 904 3,173 l FIRE RESCUE 378 393 477 494 1,742 I LIBRARIES 278 343 411 528 1,560 LAW ENFORCEMENT: I -COUNTYWIDE 67 71 73 83 294 I -ROAD PATROL 384 384 494 497 1,759 I TOTAL ALL FEES 19,518 20,900 24,484 21,780 86,682 I i * NOTE: Road impact fee revenue collected from FY1979 - FY1989 totaled $56,655,000. ¡ Source: Revenue and Expenditure Analysis, Exhibit C IMPACT FEE REVIEW COHHITTEE I The Impact Fee Review Committee is established by Sec. 4.8 of , Article 4, Decisionmakina. Administrative and Enforcement Bodies. of the Unified Land Development Code (ULDC). The Committee's .'} purpose is to oversee the county's impact fee system and to report _ its findings to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). I The members of the Committee were appointed by the BCC at its j regular meeting on August 17, 1993. The members of the Committee are listed in Exhibit A, attached. . I The Impact Fee Review Committee had its first meeting on December 13, 1993. The convening of this Committee coincides with the county's first update and revision of Article 10, Impact Fees, I since it was first passed in 1989. This is the Committee's first report to the BCC, as required by ! Section 4.8.B.1 of the ULDC. Normally, the Committee's first J DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; I IFRC REPORT TO THE BCC 1 j . 1 \ report of the year would be presented to the BCC by February 15. , However, as a result of the delay in convening the committee, the members felt that they did not have sufficient time to review the \ volumes of material presented by staff and the county's consultant. Additional time was required to make an effective review of both , the existing impact fee system and the extensive proposed changes, I especially since the Committee is making its review for the first I time. The Committee requested and received Administrative approval to extend its report deadline to June 28. The Impact Fee ¡Consultant's contract time was extended, with no additional cost to the county, to accommodate the revised schedule. I POWERS AND DUTIES \ The powers and duties of the Impact Fee Review committee are established by Sec. 4.8.B of the ULDC as follows: í Ð. Powers and Duties. The Impact Fee Review Committee shall have ¡ the following powers and duties under the provisions of this Code: 1. To submit Reports to the Board of County Commissioners by February 15 and August 15 of each year relating to: ¡ a. The implementation of Art. 10, Impact Fees; ) b. Actual levels of service for the impact fees ] exacted in Art 10, Impact Fees; c. The collection, encumbrance, and expenditure of all } impact fees collected pursuant to Art. 10, Impact Fees; d. The validity of the assumptions in the technical j memoranda used to support the impact fee schedules _ in Art. 10, Impact Fees; and 1 e. ~y recommended amendment to Art. 10, Impact, Fees. . 2. To reV1ew amendments to Art. 10, Impact Fees, pr10r to their consideration by the Board of county Commissioners. 1 3. To perform such other duties as the Board of County Commissioners deems appropriate. ! The Committee decided to complete its review of the existing impact fee implementation system first, and then to examine the proposed I updates and revisions to the Technical Memorandum and the J DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; IFRC REPORT TO THE BeC 2 I I ¡ . " ¡ .. } , ordinance. The Committee reviewed the following information, , I provided by staff: ì - Article 10, Impact Fees, Unified Land Development Code i - Technical Memorandum on the Methods Used to Calculate I Impact Fees, Palm Beach county, Florida, August, 1989 - Revenue and Expenditure Analysis, Impact Fees , - Report on Creation of Impact Fee Zones ! - Available Impact Fee Credit Analysis - Financial Tables, Comprehensive Plan, Capital I Improvements Element I - Policies and Procedures Relating to Impact Fees - Internal Audit Report 92-53, Impact Fees (Municipalities) ¡ - Internal Audit Report 93-29, PZ&B Revenue and Cash Controls - 1991 National Average Impact Fees by Type (provided by \ Consultant) - Report on Purpose and Intent of Impact Fees - Technical Memorandum on the Methods Used to Calculate and Update Impact Fees, Palm Beach county, Florida, February, I 1994, and Subsequent Drafts I - Scope of Work, Consultant's Contract for Update and Development of Impact Fees ¡ - Memorandum from County Attorney's Office on Exactions for Road Right-of-Way - capital Improvement Program, Palm Beach County, and Five ! Year capital Project Plan, Solid Waste Authority - Staff & Consultant Input at Meetings j ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ¡ IMPLEMENTATION FINDING #1: The Committee found that the implementation of the impact fee system is generally in accordance with Article 10. J FINDING #2: The Committee does have a concern about the level of staff effort devoted to this system, which generates over $20 l million per year in capital project revenue for the county. The Committee found that the impact fee system is being overseen county-wide by one person: the Impact Fee Coordinator. As ¡ described in PPM # CW-F-033, this person's duties include the following, and cover both county and municipal activities as related to impact fees: 1 - Training and oversight of municipal and county staff in the collection of impact fees; I i DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; IFRC REPORT TO THE BCC 3 I , ] . \ . - Reviewing the capi tal budgets of the recipient departments spending impact fees to ensure compliance with Article 10; - Coordinating, developing, and updating municipal and county policy and procedure manuals associated with impact fee administration; , - Developing and updating impact fee schedules; \ - Reviewing all applications for independent calculations I and credits for impact fees; - Determining the acceptability of requests for special ) exception and conditionally imposed impact fees; ) - Reviewing and controlling all requests for refunds, recomputations, adjustments or credits to previously computed and established impact fee assessments; - processing appeals to the Impact Fee Appeals Board, and presenting the county's position; and r - Serving as the point of contact for this Committee, \ compiling information and making reports to this I Committee. ¡ The Committee found that as development activity increases, the I workload of this individual also increases. The Committee was particularly concerned with the procedure for calculating and \ authorizing credits to developers for in-kind contributions for , impact fees. The system in place for calculating and authorizing I credits is accurate, but very slow. The Impact Fee Coordinator, in addition to many other duties, must research, calculate and , authorize all credits requested for permits issued in the unincorporated area and all municipalities. 1 In order to prevent developments from being held up pending authorization of credits, Article 10 allows developers to pull building permits prior to the authorization of credits by I depositing into escrow accounts amounts equal the impact fee which ! would have been paid. When the credit is authorized, the Impact Fee Coordinator also calculates the amount in the escrow account to , be released to the developer and to the county (if any). , j The Committee found that the system is overloaded. The Impact Fee Coordinator runs a one-person office. There is no back-up on staff I if she should become ill or injured, and she stated that she works a large amount of overtime on an on-going basis. The Committee found that in this case, the county's efforts to keep staff ~ positions at a minimum is a false economy. i RECOMMENDATION: The Impact Fee Coordinator should have at least one additional staff person answering to her to assist wi th researching and calculating credits, reviewing independent calculations, and other duties. i j , DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; IFRC REPORT TO THE BCC 4 I I , ] , ( FINDING #3: Article 10 allows an existing use credit when a development replaces or renovates an existing development. This existing use credit is of particular concern to the municipalities, I where redevelopment is most likely to occur. \ Article 10 states "use of a structure or land which has been .\ abandoned for a period of more that five (5) years shall not be considered existing for the purposes of this article" . The Committee found that, given the likely insignificant impact on the CIE and the impact fee revenue stream, and the current economic ! climate, the five year limitation on existing use credits may not give sufficient time for developers and redevelopment agencies/programs to take advantage of redevelopment options. RECOMMENDATION: The County should not limit the number of years in which the existing use credit can be used. I ACTUAL LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR IMPACT FEES EXACTED j' Existing levels of service are used to calculate the impact fees. The formula, generally, is as follows: j TOTAL CAPITAL COST = COST TO PROVIDE EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE I CREDITS = CREDIT FOR BOND, GRANT AND TAX PAYMENTS FOR CAPITAL ¡ PROJECTS ! TOTAL CAPITAL COST / TOTAL POPULATION = PER CAPITA COST TOTAL CREDITS / TOTAL POPULATION = PER CAPITA CREDITS PER CAPITA COST X PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD = COST PER UNIT I ¡ PER CAPITA COST X PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD = CREDITS PER UNIT COST PER UNIT - CREDITS PER UNIT = NET COST (IMPACT FEE) J FINDING #4: The Committee found that the county-wide levels of service used to calculate the impact fees did not take into account r the lower cost for delivery of services which occurs as intensity ; of development goes up. In some cases, except for the cost of land acquisition, the cost of delivering such services as fire rescue and law enforcement goes down as the efficiency of serving denser I developments is realized. Because the impact fee benefit zones cross urban and suburban : boundaries, differing growth rates are often inappropriately mixed . together in the county's calculation of capital cost, and the resulting impact fees. I I i DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; ! IFRC REPORT TO THE BCC 5 ¡ i , , The Glades area is exempt from impact fees at this time because I there are no growth-related capital projects planned there. In the same way, portions of the coastal areas may be also exempt from impact fees, in that there may be limited growth, level of service standard exemptions, development districts, or other regulatory incentives or restrictions. RECOMMENDATION: The county should undertake a review of its benefit zones, boundaries and methodology, taking into account economies of scale when calculating levels of service, the size and location of benefit zones. The county should consider exempting those areas which do not have growth-related needs. , FINDING #5: The Committee found that there are situations where I I the value of an in-kind contribution made by a developer may exceed the total impact fee imposed on the development for that capital i facility. Article 10 prohibits transfer of remaining credit to I other developments and prohibits use of the credit for payment of ¡ , impact fees other than the one for which the in-kind contribution was made. I The Committee found that this method of use of impact fee credits fails to take into account the relationship between levels of i service, concurrency, and impact fees. The Committee used the I following example to illustrate its concern: J EXAMPLE: Assume XYZ Development cannot meet traffic performance standards under current conditions. Assume also that XYZ Development will be required to pay a total of $750,000 in road impact fees when the development receives its i building permits. The road improvements required cost a total I of $1,000,000, are not on the County's current Five Year Road i Program, and are not likely to be done by the County within ¡ the next several years. XYZ Development agrees to make the ¡ road improvements as a condition of zoning approval. I Under this example, XYZ Development contributes $250,000 more than its fair share toward the County's road system, The County receives the benefit of the road improvement, and also sees increased road impact fee revenue in that zone as the new I road improvement opens up additional parcels which previously I, could not have met traffic performance standards. XYZ Development receives more road impact fee credit than it could ever use. It receives regulatory approval to proceed, but does not receive compensation for its contributions over and above its fair share. RECOMMENDATION: The County should consider, and direct the Impact Fee Review Committee to further review, amending Article 10 to allow developers to: DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; , IFRC REPORT TO THE BCC 6 I I i . , ~ - be reimbursed for the excess impact fee credits from I future revenues in the same impact fee fund - use the excess impact fee credits to satisfy other types of impact fees for that development, with a transfer of funding between the funds affected - transfer, sell or donate the excess impact fee credits to other developments in the same benefit zone. COLLECTION. ENCUMBRANCE. AND EXPENDITURE OP ALL IMPACT FEES COLLECTED Overall, the Committee found that the impact fees are being I collected, encumbered, and expended properly. Although there are j some issues from the Internal Auditor's reports which need to be addressed, the impact fees collected by the county and the j municipalities appear to be accounted for with reasonable accuracy. The Impact Fee Coordinator reviews proposed impact fee expenditures for compliance with the ordinance prior to a proposed project being presented to the BCC for approval. i I FINDING #6: The county is currently spending impact fee monies which were collected in 1990 and 1991. The Committee found that \ some of this delay is necessary, since funds have to build up in i the accounts before enough is accumulated to pay for a capital project. However, the Committee does have a concern that the I county should keep such delay to a minimum. RECOMMENDATION: Impact fee dollars collected by the county should be spent as soon as reasonably possible. j REPORTING OF ASSETS RECEIVED FROM DEVELOPER IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS , ¡ FINDING #7: Article 10 allows a credit against a development's impact fees for the value of in-kind contributions made by the , development to the -county or school board. Once a credi t is i approved, building permits are issued by charging against the J credit instead of payment of impact fees. Once the credit is exhausted, the development must resume payment of impact fees. I ¡ At present, approximately $23.5 million in unused impact fee credits are available to developments in the unincorporated area. , This does not include credits for developments in municipalities, : or older road impact fee credits, which are pro-rated over all of the building permits in the development instead of going through the credit system. ì ! In-kind contributions to the county or the school board, such as the donation of a school site, do not show up as revenue in the system. However, such donation results in a credit against the DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; IFRC REPORT TO THE BCC 7 ! , . \ ¡ development's impact fees, which reduces revenue in the future. The Committee found that this reporting method artificially reduces reports of the total benefit that the county receives from developers under the impact fee system. RECOMMENDATION: The County reporting on impact fee revenue should reflect the value of in-kind contributions by developers, and be labelled as such. I I ~IDITY OF ASSUMPTIONS IN THE TECHNICAL MEMORANDA The Committee expended a great deal of effort and hours in its 1 detailed review of Dr. Nicholas' Technical Memorandum. The Technical Memorandum establishes the total cost of providing the capital facilities for which impact fees are imposed, an essential , starting point for a fair impact fee system. Therefore, the Committee was very concerned that this document be as accurate as possible. ¡Five drafts of this document were reviewed, as well as interim revisions in between the drafts. The Committee examined many documents, such as population estimates, financial data, cost J estimate worksheets, traffic generation rates, and facility inventories in its review of the Memorandum. The Committee's findings are as follows: I ! CAPITAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATES FINDING #8: The Committee found that population estimates, I' occupancy rates, and outstanding indebtedness all appear to be accurately reported in the Methodology. However, the Committee has a concern about the cost estimates for capital projects from the j user departments. RECOMMENDATION: The Committee will perform further review of I departmental estimates of the cost of future projects. ALTERNATE MODES OF TRANSPORTATION ¡FINDING #9: The Committee recognizes the trend towards alternate modes of transportation, such as bicycling, walking, and mass transit, in urban and suburban development and redevelopment ¡projects, which have the effect of reducing the impact on the County's road system. RECOMMENDATION: The Board of County Commissioners should direct I the Impact Fee Review Committee and county staff to review methods . to encourage alternative methods of transportation in order to reduce road impacts and vehicle trips. I ¡ DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; IFRC REPORT TO THE BCC 8 , : XNCREASED ROAD IMPACT FEE FINDXNG #10: The road impact fee has increased from $165.00 per mile to $376.00 per mile, a 128% increase over 1989 levels. The addition of right-of-way cost and an increase in the trip length charged account for the largest portion of this increase. The other half occurs because the current Five-Year Road Program includes some projects which are more costly than those in the program in 1989. Examples are the Donald Ross Road Bridge, a costly proj ect with almost no lane miles, and Indiantown Road, which has a very high construction estimate because of the expensive mitigation required. I RECOMMENDATION: The road impact fee should be imposed at a level that includes the cost of right-of-way, but does not include the increased trip length. 1 \ FINDING #11: The addition of right-of-way will result in a large ) increase in the credits being claimed against this revenue stream, severely lowering the monies available for the road program. I However, the Committee felt that the County must allow right-of-way credits when imposing impact fees for right-of-way costs. 'I RECOMMENDATION: Credits for right-of-way should be allowed to be I used across the board towards a development's road impact fees. I J The Committee will address particular approaches as drafting of the Î Ordinance goes forward. I ì Schools I The school impact fee has more than doubled, according to the I Methodology. The cost of school facilities is now being added to J land cost to develop the school impact fee. I FINDING #12: The Committee recognizes the critical importance of funding school projects. However, the Committee needs additional information regarding school impacts, costs, budgets, etc. Also J the Committee questions the accuracy of the data provided thus far, even though it is the best data available at this time. The Committee also heard from the School Board staff that they are I developing innovative approaches to site design and construction. ) RECOMMENDATION: The Committee will continue to review new data as . it becomes available. I I Solid Waste I I The Committee reviewed two different methodologies for solid waste impact fees. The first was based on a recoupment method similar to that used for water utility fees. This recoupment method bases the DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; XFRC REPORT TO THE BCC 9 i i , 1 ¡ J \ I impact fee on the additional debt service which will be required \ when solid waste facilities have to be replaced sooner under a I growth scenario than they would have been replaced if no growth had ) occurred. The impact fee is designed to cover the additional cost I of the debt service. Dr. Nicholas informed the Committee that no jurisdiction to his knowledge has used this type of methodology for ! solid waste impact fees. i j The second methodology was based upon a traditional methodology I similar to that used to calculate the other impact fees. That is, a calculation of the costs involved in the provision of solid waste ! facilities, with credits given for other sources of revenue which will be used to fund the facilities. This methodology, however, I results in an impact fee calculation which is significantly higher than the recoupment method. 1 FINDING #13: Irrespective of the issue of which methodology to use, the Committee found that the data supporting the solid waste impact fee was lacking. In its evaluation of data presented by the Solid Waste Authority, the Committee was unable to determine \ whether a solid waste impact fee is justified at this time. The Committee was unable to determine from the data presented whether the Solid Waste Authority had accurately accounted for trends such 1 as increases in recycling rates. Also, the impact fee proposed would provide such a small portion of the revenue required by the Solid Waste Authority for its capital program, that it should not be a priority at this time. RECOMMENDATION: The Solid Waste Impact Fee should not be imposed at this time. The Committee will continue to meet with the staff 1 and seek additional information regarding the Solid Waste Impact Fee. I TOTAL IMPACT FEES FINDING #14: The Methodology calculates total impact fees that are ) double current levels for residential and triple the current levels for non-residential uses. The summary provided by staff shows a total proposed increase of 108% over the existing residential impact fees, from $2,920 to $6,073 for an average single family ¡ residence of between 1,400 and 1,999 sq. ft. However, the county is not legally required to impose these fees at ¡ their full level. It is completely within the purview of the Board of County Commissioners to impose the fees at a lower level. The Committee recognizes that levels of service will deteriorate at ! some point in time. However, this is an opportunity for the county to extend its reinventing government concept to the efficient provision of capital facilities, with concepts such as pUblic/private partnerships, in order to minimize the deterioration I in the levels of service. DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; I IFRC REPORT '1'0 THE BCC 10 I ! I I \ ! I It is the committee's opinion that too drastic increase in an impact fees at this time will cripple the struggling recovery under l way in the real estate and construction industries. i RECOMKEHDATION: The Committee recommends that the impact fees be imposed at the following levels (see Table 2): ROADS Impose at a level to include the cost of right-of-way, but not to include the increased trip length calculated in the Methodology. , SCHOOLS Impose 75% of the proposed increase. i I Impose 25% of the proposed increase. PARKS ¡ PUBLIC BUILDINGS Keep at current level. j FIRE RESCUE Keep at current level. I ! LIBRARIES Keep at current level. I LAW ENFORCEMENT- I COUNTYWIDE Impose at $0 fee per Methodology. I PATROL Keep at current level. I SOLID WASTE No fee imposed at this time. I i I I RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE ARTICLES I As stated in the Article which established the Committee, we will I be actively involved in drafting ordinance changes. ¡ FINDING #15: The Committee has found the Impact Fee Coordinator to be its most valuable source of the information the Committee needs to fulfill its charge. However, as a voting member of the Impact ] Fee Review Committee, Ms. Baker is limited by Sunshine Law in the communications which she can have with the Committee Members. The Committee wishes to make it clear that the way in which Ms. Baker ¡ has conducted herself is above reproach. However, the dual role of support staff and voting member of the Committee places her in a position which may lead to a conflict of interest. 1 RECOMMENDATION: Article 4.8 should be amended to make the Impact Fee Coordinator a non-voting member of the Committee. i I I DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; I IFRC REPORT TO THE BCC 11 FIND7NG #16: The Committee has found that to adequately review the impact fee system, extensive time will be required. This time will be used to review and analyze the past, present and future budgets, I methodology, level of services and numerous other financial and ! planning data for each impact fee. RECOHKENDATION: Amend Article 4.8 of the ULDC to provide for an annual report to the Board of County commissioners instead of bi-annual reports. I 1 I , j i i i ! I i I i \ I I I I J j DRAFT DTD 4/18/94; ~FRC REPORT TO THE BCC 12 J I , EXHIBIT A I I I I IMPACT FEE REVIEW COMMITTEE ! MEMBERS Lester Baird, City Manager Municipal Representative City of South Bay David Keir, Vice Mayor Municipal Representative Town of Lake Clarke Shores ¡ Daniel Shepherd, Vice Mayor Municipal Representative city of Lake Worth 1 Christopher Brown, Executive Director Municipal Representative I Delray Beach CRA Daniel Lewis, Real Estate Broker Business community I DP Lewis & Associates I I ¡ F. Martin Perry, Attorney Business community Perry, Shapiro, Miller & Jarkesy PA E. Llwyd Ecclestone III, Developer Business community I Linda M. Presz, Consultant At-Large I , ! Eugene A. Nowak, Planner At-Large City of Lake Worth , ! Chip Carlson, Attorney At-Large I Joseph B. Pollock, Jr., Engineer Impact Fee Appeals Board Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. \ Verdenia C. Baker - Impact Fee Coordinator J I staff , Leonard Berger, Assistant County Attorney Charlie Walker, Traffic Engineering j Dan Pellowitz, Solid Waste Authority Bob McKinney, County Library Steve Delai, Fire Rescue I Diana Newcomer, Sheriff's Office August Hernandez, School Board Audrey Wolf, Facilities Planning & Design Tim Granowitz, Parks & Recreation I ¡ \ . EXHIBIT B 1 I Article 4,' DECISIONMAKlNG, ADMINISTRA11VE ( I AND ENFORCEMENT BODIES Sec. 4.8lmpacr Fee Review Committee SEC.4.8 IMPACT FEE REVIEW COMMlTI'EE. A. Establishment. There is hereby created an Impact Fee Review Committee. , i B. Powers and duties. The Impact Fee Review Committee shall have the following powers and ! duties under the provisions of this Code: 1. To submit Reports to the Board of County Commissioners by February IS and August 15 of each year relating to: i a. The implementation of Art. 10, Impact Fees; I b, Actual levels of service for the impact fees exacted in Art. 10, Impact Fees; \ The collection, encumbrance, and expenditure of all impact fees collected I c. i pursuant to Art. 10, Impact Fees; d. The validity of the assumptions in the technical memoranda used to support the I impact fee schedules in Art 10, Impact Fees; and i e. Any recommended amendment to Art, 10, Impact Fees. ! 2. To review amendments to Art. 10, Impact Fees, prior to their consideration by the Board ( of County Commissioners. I ! 3. To perform such other duties as the Board of County Commissioners deems appropria~. i C. Board Membership. i 1. Oualifications. Members of the Impact Fee Review Committee shall be qualified electors of Palm Beach County for two (2) years prior to appointment. No member of the Board of County Commissioners or a County employee, including a Board of County Commission aide, except the Impact Fee Coordinator, shall serve on the Impact Fee J Review Committee. The Impact Fee Review Committee shall be composed of twelve (12) members, The membership of the Impact Fee Review Committee shall include four (4)- representatives from municipalities within the County, three (3) representatives from the business community, one (1) member of the Zoning Commission, three (3) J representatives selected at large, and the Impact Fee Coordinator. 2. Appointment. Members of the Impact Fee Review Committee shall be appointed by the I Board of County Commissioners. I J LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA I ADOpnONJUNE16,l~2 4-30 I , , - Article 4: DECISIONMAKING, ADMINISTRATIVE AND ENFORCEMENT BODIES Sec. 4.8 Impact Fee Review Committee 3. Tenns of office. a. All Impact Fee Review Committee members shall serve a term of three (3) years, All members serving on the Impact Fee Review Committee on the effective date of this Code shall complete their terms according to their prior appointments. b. There shall be no limit on the number of terms a person may serve on the Impact Fee Review Committee. i c. The maximum number of boards and commissions that a person appointed by I the Board of County Commissioners may serve on at one (1) time shall be three (3). Members affected by this provision shall be governed by Resolution No. 91- I 1003. I I i d. Members of the Impact Fee Review Committee shall not be prohibited from qualifying as a candidate for elected office. 4. Removal from office. , In the event that any Impact Fee Review Committee member is convicted of a I a. , felony or an offense involving moral turpitude while in office, the Board of County Commissioners shall terminate the appointment of such person as a member of the Impact Fee Review Committee. b. Any member who fails to attend three (3) consecutive regular meetings without j an excused absence or one-half (Ih) of the meetings within a calendar year shall automatically forfeit the appointment, and the Board of County Commissioners 1 shall promptly fill such vacancy. Participation for less than three-fourths (3/4) of a meeting shall constitute lack of attendance. c. Excused absence constitutes absence due to illness, absence from Palm Beach County, or personal hardship, if approved by a majority vote of the membership i of the Impact Fee Review Committee. Excused absence shall be entered into the I minutes at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Impact Fee Review , Committee. I d. Members removed from office shall be terminated immediately and not continue I i to serve until a new appointment is made by the Board of County CoOUÌússioners. i LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOP110N JUNE 16, 1992 4-31 , . ¡ .. 1 - ( I Article 4: DECISIONMAKING, ADMINISTRATIVE AND ENFORCEMENT BODIES Sec. 4.8 ImTJact Fee Review Committee 5. Vacancy. a. When an Impact Fee Review Committee member resigns or is removed, the Board of County Commissioners shall fill the vacancy within thirty (30) days. b. Any appointment to fill any vacancy shall be for the remainder of the unexpired term of office. 6. Conflict of Interest. I a. General. No Impact Fee Review Committee member shall have any interest, I financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, or engage in any business transaction or professional activities, or incur any obligation of any nature which is in i substantial conflict with the proper discharge of duties as a member of the I Impact Fee Review Committee. I b. Imolementation. To implement this policy and strengthen the faith and I confidence of tbe citizens of Palm Beach County, members of the Impact Fee Review Committee are directed: I (1) To be governed by the applicable provisions of the Palm Beach County Ethics Ordinance, upon adoption of such ordinance. I (2) Not to accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend to ( I improperly influence the discharge of official duties. (3) To make known by written or oral disclosure, on the record at an Impact Fee Review Committee meeting, any interest which the member has in any pending matter before the Impact Fee Review Committee, before any deliberation on that matter. I (4) To abstain from using membership on the Impact Fee Review Committee to secure special privileges or exemptions, i To refrain from engaging in any business or professional activity which I (5) J might reasonably be expected to require disclosure of information t acquired by membership on the Impact Fee Review Committee not ¡ available to members of the general public, and to refrain from using I such information for personal gain or benefit. I (6) To refrain from accepting employment which might impair independent I judgment in the performance of responsibilities as a member of the Impact Fee Review Committee. I j LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA I ADOP770N JUNE 16, 1992 4-32 . I , , Article 4: DECISIONMAKING, ADMINISTRATIVE AND ENFORCEMENT BODIES Sec. 4.8lmpacr Fee Review Committee (7) To refrain from accepting or receiving any additional compensation from any source other than Palm Beach County for duties performed as a member of the Impact Fee Review Committee. , , (8) To refrain from transacting any business in an official capacity as a I member of the Impact Fee Review Committee with any business entity of which the member is an officer, director, agent or member, or in which the member owns a controlling interest. (9) To refrain from participation in any matter in which the member bas I a personal investment which will create a substantial conflict between I ! private and public interests. i c. Board action. Willful violation of this subsection which affects a vote of an I Impact Fee Review Committee member shall render that action voidable by the Board of County Commissioners. ] D. Officers. 1. Chainnan and vice-chainnan. At an annual organizational meeting, the members of ¡ the Impact Fee Review Committee shall elect one (1) of their members as Chairman and I ) one (1) as Vice-Chairman. In the absence of the Chairman, the Vice-Chairman shall act as Chairman and shall have all powers of the Chairman. The Chairman shall serve a tenn of one (1) year. No member shall serve as Chairman for more than two (2) consecutive terms. The Chairman shall be in charge of all proceedings before the Impact Fee Review Committee, and shall take such action as shall be necessary to preserve the . I order and tbe integrity of all proceedings before the Impact Fee Review Committee. I ¡ 2. Secretary . The Impact Fee Coordinator shall serve as Secretary of the Impact Fee Review Committee. The Secretary shall keep minutes of aU proceedings of the Impact , Fee Review Committee, which minutes shall be a summary of all proceedings before the 1 I Committee, attested to by tbe Secretary. and which shall include the vote of each member upon every question. The minutes shall be approved by a majority of the members of I the Impact Fee Review Committee voting when a quorum is present. In addition, the I Secretary shall maintain all records of the Impact Fee Review Committee meetings, and J proceedings and the correspondence of the Impact Fee Review Committee. The records ! of the Impact Fee Review Committee shall be stored with the agency serving as Secretary herein, and shall be available for inSpection by the public, upon reasonable request, , during nonnal business hours. 3. Staff. The staff of the Impact Fee Review Committee shall be tbe professional staff of the Impact Fee Coordinator. 4. County attornev. The County Attorney's Office shall provide counsel and interpretation on legal issues. LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA I ADOPTION JUNE 16, 1992 4-33 , , 1 ! I ( \ Article 4: DECISIONMAKlNG, ADMIN1STRA77VE I i AND ENFORCEMENT BODIES Sec. 4.81mlJact Fee Review Committee S. Quorum and votinl!. No meeting of the Impact Fee Review Committee shall be called to order, nor may any business be transacted by the Impact Fee Review Committee, without a quorum consisting of a majority of appointed members of the Impact Fee Review Committee being present. A majority of the quorum present shall be necessary for the Impact Fee Review Committee to take action. In the event of a tie vote, the proposed motion shall be considered to have failed. No member shall abstain from voting unless there is a conflict of interest pursuant to this Article, or See, 112.01 ct. §!ðl., Fla. Stat. 6. Rules of Drocedure. All meetings shall be governed by Robert's Rules of Order. The I Impact Fee Review Committee may, by a majority vote of the entire membership, adopt additional rules of procedure for the transaction of business and shall keep a record of meetings, resolutions, findings and determinations. The Impact Fee Review Committee I may provide for transcription of such proceedings, or portions of proceedings, as may I be deemed necessary. I E. Meetinl!s. I I 1. General or sDecial meetilUls. General meetings of the Impact Fee Review Committee shall be held no less frequently than once every three (3) months. Special meetings may I be called by the Chairman of the linpact Fee Review Committee, or in writing by a , majority of appointed members of the Impact Fee Review Committee. Twenty four (24) i hour written notice shall be given to each Impact Fee Review Committee member for a ( , special meeting. I I , ! 2. Location. The location of meetings shall be in Palm Beach County, Florida. , 3. Continuance. If a matter is postponed due to lack of a quorum, the Chairman shall ¡ \ continue the meeting to the next regularly scheduled Impact Fee Review Committee I meeting. The Secretary shall notify all members of the date of the continued meeting. , I 4. Meetinl!s ODen to DubUc. All meetings of the Impact Fee Review Committee shall be open to the public. i S. Annual Reoort. The Impact Fee Review Committee shall submit an Annual Report to J the Board of County Commissioners. The form, substance, and submittal dates for the Annual Report shall be established by a Policy and Procedure Memorandum (PPM). 1 Compensation. The members of the Impact Fee Review Committee shall receive no I F. , compensation for their services. Travel reimbursements are limited to expenses incurred only for I travel outside Palm Beach County necessary to fulfill responsibilities of membership on the Impact Fee Review Committee. Travel reimbursement shall be made only when sufficient funds bave been budgeted and are available, and upon the prior approval of tbe Board of County Commissioners. No other expenses are reimbursable except documented long distance telephone calls to the staff to fulfill the responsibilities of membership on the Impact Fee Review Committee. ! ¡ LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA ! ADOPT/ON JUNE 16, 1992 4-34 I , , EXHIBIT C (\1"101 1'3 .... ..... ~., 01 on N... ¡~~ f, ~ _...~~~ ¡; ON ~ ~ .~ ~ ;r;~ ... 2~;;:; .... -...8:). ... '" .... ~ ~ ~ ......- <Ii 0 ~i8 ~ ~ "':·~2 '" g ÖÖ ·0 ¡ -...- (:; ~ ~~Ui ~ Ui~~t! g -~... 0 ~"':,þ .,¡ ':.Ñ : ~ NN"_ - NN"'_ Ö ;; ;; ¡; WU) WU) !ëW ~~ Oa: ) .~ II: :! 01 8 IE 00001 i ot: I ~o o.~ ..: g2 \ .ffi "'~'" ...N_ : ci:æ I%:Q, ~~ ~~ > ì e rn I I ~ Z NtDlDOI ~ ~"'...Ol i~~;1 ~ .< ~i§~~ N liiet !!!!f, ~ W &l~~ f, liiet - ; 2 ~ ... g . . .:; WI g..:..: . ......... ~ WI S:Ø;~2 ~~~~ ,,; 1%:", N U)EiU) a:", ~ w'" ",:8:: "': :> W~ ... ~ ~~ 0 - ;; ~~ ... ~ ~ ;; z W W 0 0 . ~"'~Ol 0 . Z ... ~!3 01 0 . ~~~~1 ~ . z ~§!~~ S ...~tI! S OW ~~~ '" ~i 0 ~Q, ... 0 ... .. ... C') - ~ ~~i ..: ......0 ö ~ ......O)N ... ~f, 0 ,,; ... et~ 00'" ... ......,.."t') '" r-.cø!~ '" ... N..... -- <'t ... __rJ_ ... cot 0> ¡; - ;; 0> ... ~ I:> I:> I ~~ I ~~ ~ w ?i: W .........01 ;;¡ Ii! ~U¡OI ~ Ii! --~~ ~ s¡ 2"'801 ~ Ii! NN~ ...... - "'ON '" I ... __ N I .~~ I iii.': ~ :;: ~':Ñ <Ii I cÞ"':':rJ ~ s¡ ..."'''' ~ N ~~~ li!æ t{ N ;::~f;t~ ~i\;:Ö '" ?i: '" ?i: ~ _N_ ,,; ":Ñ ... ?i: - ~ ¡; ... ... ......NOI <õ s¡ ~NOOI 0 ~~~~1 0 s¡ -¡"'Ol 'N s: -"'- ¡e- t; s: ~ ~.~ Õ. ......0> CD I . .~ I I g~~ Ö - "'0", - J ~~;r;Ñ '" 0; NNO) It) ø; '" ~t:~ ì'ii ;; ~ ¡!¡(:;~ ~ ~ 10"0.- t ?i: -- ~ - N ?i: N ¡; ... ... ã; t') CO,..,. or ~ õi N..... Q) 01 :g ;; ......CD1 N 0; f, NN~1 ~ £:ICDN N"'''' ~~~:8 N i I cD~~ CD I <'t-;~ I '" I ...188 & .,; g 0"'0 t g II)N,...,(I) 8i 8 ~cívi~ N -"'... Iii "'f, '" ~g:~~ et::¡~ ... ?i: Q)~~ t ... ?i: cot t ~ -- '" ... - - ~ - ~ ... I \ g .........01· i\; g NOOOI N g 00001 0 0 00001 0 ... ~ .,. 01 .,. ¡;;~&\ ~ 1 01 '" I I t'i~cñ ~ ... I '" 0> 0> æ - - '" CD ... ... q Øl CD \ ?i: -- N ?i: ?i: t I ... ~ I ~ ::I rn ¡ w .t! 0 c Z r ~ \ II! g ::t '-.. :> rn ! 0 W ~ z :> ; ~ z rn W < ª¡ II) w ~ W ~ II: ;¡ ~ ~ I%: ~ I W < W c- > irJ .... :> 0 z w W ~ < z z < ~ ... ~ z W W w b ¥~ < ~ ~ a.. w liS w W < 'ä~ w I%: Z ... W Q, 0 w w W w I:; ... ::t z Uz I ... W ~ W b _(\I",.. < _C\l(I)" a :~ ¡ Þ- ... ... ~ ~~~~ Õ rn wwww .! 0 b -NP.I~ I%: Þ- -Nt')... ~ W zzzz - . ! ~ WWWW ì£ 0 wwww ì£ ::t 2222 0 S 0000 0 I~ ~ ôôôz ~ ôôôô - ::t X NNNN X ::t ~ ~ .... d gggg 0 t: gggg 0 - ::t NNN2 ~ 0 (I) 0 CI) =ð; - .... NNNN .... 0 .... Z ..J ì£ ì£ ì£ì£ì£¡ ~ ì£ ì£æææ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 21 :z: :z: x:z:xx xxx x < ~ ~~~a. 0 ~ ~~~~ 0 0 g gggg g 0000 g s~ a. Þ- ~ rn CI)(I)CI)CI) I \ ! . , , t ~_·~~8~~~-~N··~~1 II) -' ~ II) ~ - · II) on · N - - ~ 0 R i ~~ ~ -' ~~~~;.~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~.~~~~~~~;.;. . ." . ~ ~N-~~~~N"'2g8~ßNonN 8: ~ NN~~~_~N~~O~N!§. ~ .0 ~q¡:;~~~~~~~ ..~ -;¡,t:i ~ ~~~ . .~~~ "I.II\~~~ ~ ~ .... ~~~C~~~~.:=h.~ _N !5J Ø)"'fDcøM')C~~::~cø...:! iii ;; ;; WI/) , !<W i o§ CO~II)N.O~N¡~~N~OO~ ! \ II:: ! ~O ~",~!.~&ï~'t.~ ::t!:t ~ .Z ~~~~~~g~~~~~m -2 oj - a:w OJ "'..- ,....O)N.. ~ ü)~ :1 i )0- j , I/) , ~ ; z t;~ on~N_~~~~~~~~~c~~l I:: ~ ~~~ ~¡ 0 8.~ ~~~E.~ 0001 ft ~~~~~~~~;¡,~~~~~ ..~ 0 W N oJ I CD 1 UlI C-~N~Om~¡~~~on~co~on <ö ~ Non~-- _~.II):&~~ Ñ a:c ~8~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ N~ èq. ;:) t;~ ~~ :: ::310 -Ii; ¡;¡ UI~ u \ ~?;: cl": ":":riclCl1":":":ffi · 0 t\Ï ~..: - J N Z ;; ... UI \ 0 I i~¡~~S¡CO~~i8~ooS~ ~ . z ~¡~~~g·~gHëi5~~o~~ IS - . OW 'tI ~ .~.<>!~...~...","l -.; ~ ~II. . . . . ."I.~ . . . .~. . "t a 1D~~8:~~~~2~i!5J8 ~ß ~i æ~~~~~8~~~2~~ -2 ië . _ N~ .~__ ~ ~ .2 C - - · I;:) ffÍ ~Ñ ..: ItÌ I ... ;; . 1 ?;: ?;:~ i \ W .. II C S ~o~~~~_oœNco~~ooO~ Ñ S œ~..~~~~!O~~~O~§o, ~ 0 I 8~~ ;;:s~:g¡;¡:ai!!Siii II! I ~t:i~;Ñ~!I! è!i~; :;: ] N '¡Mllilli,,;o;vi.c?,,;,:tt>.,; ~ ,,; N o'i";."':':"¡<ÖÑ";"':.o'i,,;g" .,¡ ~ :¡¡~~~=~~~~;;;~Ñ:It ~ HI (II :8 :s ì ?;: ?;: :¡¡2~~f6Ci!;Cii~CO~~~~:& c - -- - Ò (O)N - NN ,..: 0 u I ;; ;; .2 c S! on.~on~~~~~NNCO~OON~ Õ S! 8 - co ~ ~ - ~ co N co . ~ ~ 0 0 01 Ñ ~ \ I ;;æ2~ ~~~~~õ ¡¡ s I ms~ ¡¡~ :::~!~ on .! ¡;; ~~i,..:~~,,;gi§~gg g Ñ ¡;; ?i~g,..:g§~iÑ~~:&~ ~ CON-:¡:;~N~~ .. NC - I:: -: -lI\co ..-.;Ci .CO'"' i ?;: -~ - .- ItÌ li: - - N -- - N Is ;; ;; c: \ J i ¡;; .~coon~~o.c~~§âoool II) ¡;; ... .... IE) ¡ U') II) CD _ N fØ N _ ... 0 0 01 D , ~ I sæ8~8æ:~HI~2 .~~ · &t~~ .~¡;¡~~~~~~~ s: '" I t') g' "':.ø<Ö"ItÌ¡~ltÌø..,,¡.. .:~ ¡ g ~~m~::~~¡¡~~~!! g 'ª .~~~N_ ~on(ll~~ø ~ß G: ('I)N ....(").-0:. ..or:NIt) _m N li: . _ -_('1,1 Ò .,:. .: C\Ï (f)~ ct) .,¡ U I ;; ;; ] \ 0 N~~2N_~0.~~~~coonl ~ g co 0 (þ - ..,. ." II) 01 i N CÞ (\I co 0 0 01 8 i '"' ~~~~~;;~~ ~~~~ ! 1 ~~~ .~;¡,~&~~~ .~~ ~~ '" I C ~~so-~-iono-.~~ 0,", ~ m ~g~i~~~¡~a~~! ~ So ~ ;e~ .~gQ)~ .~~;~~ ~= iòi I li: · li: .: Ñ ..: \ - N_ N - 1 ;; ;; u !E C ~Mom~N(")II)(,,)"'NcøNm§COI ¡2Øi~~~~~~g~~0~~ 1 ~ · 2 ] I ~~~~~~~.~~~:ii~~=l .~ æ .....~ ._C')O.......Ø.N II en Š ~ --cø.....-CD~U')It).....,...Q)_t')cø- iB I M8~.,¡Ñ~~.:Ñ.,..:~Ñ ø~ ~ !It~ID:;~~ .~~~II\~~- ~ en ~ ~ .~~~18 !;¡~;z¡e.~ - :! . - "'C?COU)CDII)C')NØ) :& ?;: Ñ f'i¿vi.ñÑIñÑ':ci Ñ i . ... ... I u . .. i I m 1 0 Z 'tI \ I/) ~ II . fij w . ! W "0 ~ ~~ÞÞ~~~~r~~~~Þ~~m CD ~~ÞÞ~~~~r~~~~~Þ~ .2 ;:) ~ ~ fj ~ z w UI ~ ü)ü)ü)iü)ü)~~ü)~ü)iü)ü)ü)ü)~ UI ~~i~~~~~~~i~~~~~ UI < .... z .... . i ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ " w a: I> w « «««< ««< ~ c \ W W wwwæwwwWUlwWlIJwwww < 0 IIJIIJIIJWWWWUlWIIJIIJWWWWW i ~ II. UI WWUI UIUIUIUIUIUIUI UlUIIIJUI Q. Z t .... ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :! < ............................æ................................ :! J .... oGooGool>oooooooo W oo~ol>oooot~l>oooo . ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 :! ~ff~ff~ffff~ffff~ 5! ff~fffffff~fffff 5! ii ~ ;g ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~ 0 ;g;g-;g;g;g;g~;g;g-;g;g;g;g;g î ~ I 0 0 --------~-------g -' z ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -' ~ < ððð~ððððððð~ðððð~ g IIJ ~ 'tI I 0 ð Q. ~ ~ l1í 5!5!5!5!5!5!5!5!5!5!5!5!5!5!5!5! 0 ! a: a: a: a: a: a:a:a:a:a:a:a: a: a: a: a: II. .... .... . I ! , .. ~j N ..I ;1 ~ ;J I ..I ;1 m .... < < ~ ..I .... 6 ..I 6 g ¡!¡ ;: N l- I- .. .... ~ .. I- ... .. WI/) WI/) ~W ~W oa: oa: IE ~i ,.. IE ~o ;; ~o ,z Ñ IZ a:W N a:W ~a.. .. ~~ >lð I/) I/) t'j ~ Z Z i1 2 ~ ~1 (Ø 1;;; ~1 ... ~ ~1 ~1 1-.. W N W CII'" i .... t WI CD m .s WI ~ a:", :::E '" a:", w'" ... ::> ;;¡ w,.. ;;¡ ::> ~~ .. 0 ~~ 0 Z Z W W 0 0 I . 11 ~ . Z ~1 c . ~ 0 . Z ~1 ~ , OW ~ ~ Ci OW I 0 0 ~a.. ~ ~a.. ~ ~ o d g ;i N N ;i ... ... '... ; ;;¡ .. .. '" I::> I::> , ~~ I ~~ ì ~ W ~ W I ii ,.. a ¡1 ... J ~ a ii c a ,.. a ,.. I ~ I ... I ~ N I !!3 N ~ :f N g '" N '" Ø> ~ ~ Ø> In ~ N I ~ .. ~ .. .. ~ :g s¡ 01 0 ~ N s¡ 01 0 s¡ .. s¡ ¡;¡ .. ... I I , !;; ;¡; I ;¡; ;¡; ,.. ;¡; ; ~ .. ~ ~ .. ~ \ ;¡; ~1 ~ ;¡; 01 0 ;¡; ~i Ø> Øi m ~ .. ¡:;: I ,.. I I , ) g ... g g CI1 g Ö co ! ... ~ ,.. ~ ~ ~ .. .. \ Ii! ;1 ,.. g 01 0 Ii! ii ~ g 01 0 ... .. .. ... , I I .s , c .s m 0 Ø> Ø> ,.. ,.. m ,.. ... ... N.N ì ~ .. ~ ~ .. ~ i ¡ f/) ¡¡j \ ~ W < ::> I/) co -- Z Z W t'j ~ < W W W ~ ... Z ~ l- f/) W a: 0 ~ ~ ... u.. W ~ W !!f W 8: t W CD CD , ... :::E :::E < Z W :::E - < t - a Z W W a !Ii 0. ~ I/) < ~ ... :::E ~ Z CJ W t Z ~ - Z W Z a: W f/) :¡¡ 9 9 w w ~ :§ ~ 0 u.. If! 0 Z I/) I/) 5 Z co 5 ~ :¡¡ Z Z CJ CJ < CJ b < ~ ~ Z Z CD co Z CD ~ I/) ~ 9 9 0 w 9 0 a.. i w . ::::I ¡¡¡ S ¡¡¡ :::E ~ § ~ 0 CD 5 5 ::::I ~ 5 ::> - CD CD ~ CD CD CD ~ Q 0 0 a.. 0 a.. ~ I ;j > ;j ~ ..I Z 0 ..I ..I Z i ..I ...J ¡¡¡ ;j < w ¡¡¡ ;: .~ ~ ;: w ~ , CD CD 5 a.. a.. ::::I ::> ::> lð ::::I ~ CD CD ~ lð ~ ~ n- o. a.. I- a.. ;j ;j :; , : i I ~1 N '... o ~i Ii¡ I I ~ ~i ~ ... 13:; 0) ~ ~ã 'I; "t ~ < ui <D ....0 ~ ri b :ï~ C? ...~ 0 ~ 'I; <D 0 ~ tl ~. N N .. ~ .. WCI) WCI) ~W ~~ Oa: ~~ I::> 0~1 \I) ~I &I OC <Ø- 5 IitN 0- 0;; ~o :;~ ~!f ,z ~ ~~ a:W ... ... ~~ .. CI) fI) ~ I z 1.;; i~ ~ ~ o~ II) I.;ð; ~~ .... ¡~ I <D W ~ ~ g CD II! I \ WI :ï! ~ ã ~ 0 a:", .... i w.... N ::> w~ 0;; ::> ~~ .. 0 ~~ ~ .. \ z w W 0 0 \ . ~~~ .... . z i~ § . ~ ~ . z ii N ~ OW o~ W 0 Ol; ~Q. e i ~ ....11) Iri :ï~ .¡ Ei ~ _C? ;i .... ... 0;; II) ði 0;; '" .. ':'::> .. I::> I ~~ I ~~ 1 ~ W ~ w i ... g¡ 8 ~~~ ~~~ ~ 8 ;~ N ~I ... !2 .... ~ U; .... , q... ~ I N<D .,; N C?O ..; I ... SJ .. N 10'" .... '" -... II) S! ~ I ~ ... \I) ~ .. ... ~ ~ .. t .. I 1 ~~ N S! 001 ~ ~ ~ S! ~1 .... S! C? S! ~ 10 I II) ì I C?C? lIS I ~ lIS I fD õi ....~ ~ õi ãi .... ãi I ... ... ... .. ~ ... ~ t ... t , ... ~~ <D õi 001 0 ;1 ... ãi ~ 10 i õi ~~ .... ... ¡;; t') ....·Iii ! I :6 I I 'I; I :;¡ 0'" :;¡ Ii t') Ii N N ....~ 11). ~ C? tl ~ ... ~ ~ tl t ... I \ 8 ... ~~ <D :;¡ 001 0 Ii ~i t;; 8 01 0 ~8! :g ... ... I <DC? g I , ~ ~ ~ "'10 ~ æ .... æ 10 t') ... 10 t') C? \ ~ ... ~ ~ ... t· ¡ fI) 1 i W ::> - z CI) CI) ~ W i < i ~ ~ w ~. w z II.; W ~ < z g¡ ~ ~ W Z ~ I \ 0 CD < ~ b ~ w - !ž a !ž W Ir ::> 8i ::E.!!: _N _N II.; æ - ¡:¡; I I W ~ ~ ~ !ž ~ ~ Z I I b NN W W NN W ¡ W w !ž !Ž!Ž ~ 0 !ž!ž ~ ß 0 w ::E W ww Z ww z ::> ~ i W ::E ~~ f2 < ~~ < 0 \ 0 W ww z CI) ww Z fI) f3 0 w Š . ~ &!&! W ~ 00 w ~ !!: a: w a: Ir ~ Ira: ~ W ::> W 0 II.; f2 ~f2 ~f2 0 a: t: g a: ~ z 0 I/) ¡¡: 0 ¡¡: z zz zz W w W ... W w ww ... Z ww ~ a: a: ... z a: ... 0> ~ ~ ~~ ~ w ~~ ~ w g ~ W ~ , I Q. ~ :s 0 ¡¡s :s:s 0 a: a: 0 I ~ ~ u. ¡¡: ~ ¡¡: ~ . i I I . EXHIBIT D : I CREATION OF IMPACT FEE ZONES Roads The original road zones created in 1979 were based on a six mile radius. This created 40 very small road zones. In 1988 the 40 zones were collapsed to create 16 new zones. This allowed for the collection of adequate funds for major projects within the benefit zone. Parks Park impact fee zones created in 1989 were based on the existing zones used by the county for the purposes of planning and maintenance of parks. These zones were also used for the park element of the Comprehensive Plan. The zones divided the coastal area into three zones and the Glades area. Schools School impact fee zones created in 1989 were based ,on the School Board's breakdown of administrative areas. These included zones in the north, central, south, w~st and the Glades area. . I I Fire Rescue I Fire Rescue impact fee zones created in 1989 were based on the J existing Municipal service Taxing Units (MSTUs) for Fire Rescue. Fire Rescue collapsed all the MSTUs into one in FY 91. As a J result, the Fire Rescue impact fee zones were also consolidated into one zone. . Library 1 The . Library impact fee zone created in 1989 consists of the unincorporated area and those municipalities that are a part of the ) Library Taxing District. Law Enforcement ¡ The Law Enforcement County-wide impact fee created in 1989 consists of the unincorporated and incorporated areas of the County. . i The Law Enforcement patrol impact fee created in 1989 consists of the unincorporated area and municipalities that do not provide road patrol services. Public Buildings The Public Buildings impact fee created in 1989 consists of the , unincorporated and incorporated areas of the County. ifrc-zones I I , - ..( (. N - - -~~''''''''''''''''I ....IIIIIII...lIlIlIlIlIly.... ~ ~ 1fIO&,."0." "0: ~~ i , J. W CORlETT WII.OI.I'C"~ - 2® ª IoIAHAG£M£HT -"'U; : I OOM'I.O -OSS: 110- , i; at c 8 ~ ! ~-.,-.,.r.. tOmf~ f1 a ~ .... ft .... 38 ..® 13 ì . ~ I ~ c ow .. . c ... .. z ~ u Z ~ u z c 1 . = 1 c i \ . I LOXAHIoTCHU NATION.&&. 1 WlI.O\.In; ItC'UQC CQlCSUV& TIC. .....CA NO.' \ LEGEND rYt1t!J¿ou . ¡',,·NAQ(M(HT A"fA I ¡ . ~Ð"VATIOM A'UtA NO a I . . . ----------- ........... " EXHI81 T B \ \ ZONES 8AREAS ~Aar: I , PACE 1 ot J 7.0NES ':::::. 40_ \ . . . . . . C" . (' . - '. f . ,- - - - - ... .._._._._~-£ I .' . f I r ",,,1(£ 38@ ... I OKttCHO.tl ! i . \ wUT ~G&N \ .. .. I .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . : "I"~T .. .. .. = .. .. .. .. .. .. i .. I: .. .. .. I .. .. i .. .. ft .. Z .. .. .. .. ,. : .. i .. '" .. OICf!UHT& 1tOA0 .. .. .. .. þ .. 0 .. II .. \ - .. .. - .. \ .. .. I .. .. .. @40 .. wt"'L"'ltO SMTN, "0&0 .. .. .. \ .. .. .. - \ .. .. .. : : : .. .. ®. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. i 39 . ! . : . " #!o..'" .. ~ : «4*. ~ ';-EGEND 'L.¥ ~i· : I ~ L$""~ ª tI.......~ ZONE BOUNDARY 'r¡:.¡! ~ : .... AREA BOUNDARY "'V:../~ ª ~q ~ ~'-'AlJII...._._"""""""" -.-- EXHIBIT B Z 0 N ES aAREAS ".01/: I - PACE 2 or J ZONES 1- 40 . " AREAS ŒJ-ø . - . (' . (' .. . " I . , . i i IMPACT FEE AJlEAS . .. , II . I' ,I ~ ~ 1\ , 1, 4, S, 6, 7 .. !I B 2, 3 C 10. 12 II D a, 9, 11 I 16, 19 r 1.5. 18 ì G 13, 14. 17* B 22, 2' 1 20, 21. 23, 24 . 3 28. 31 - I: 26. 27. U. 30 L 34. 37 í K 32. 33. 3'. 36 \ ..as"" ~ 2' 11 I 0 40 I . I , P 39 \ . . . \ . \ . . I , I - I , \ . EXBIUT B I PACE 3 of.3 , : \ \ 1\ I. . r . ~ \ , . r'1 - . ( . - . . . NOTICE OF EXPANSION OF ROAD IMPAC'1' FEE ZONES . AFFECTING EXPENDITURES OF FUNDS AND POTENTIAL IlEFUNDS. . . . Moclee 1& hereby given Co all pe'uons hevlna paid fair share contribution for road improvement ordinance fees (Road Impact Feu) prior to October 1. 1988. Please be advised that the Road Impact Fee Ordinance In effect prior to October 1. 1988 restricted the expend1ture of rO&Q Impact fees to forty Individual ¡eographic zones throughout Palm Beach County. Eflective October 1. 1989. the feu collected prlot:' to October 1. 1988 _y be spent 1n & larser geolraphic area unle.. the present owner of the prop.rey for which the f.e. vera paid petition. ehe Board of County COlIDis.ioner. 1n vdUDS for a restriction on the .. expenditure of the fe.. to the smaller ,eographic zone wi~ which the, ! vere collected. The amendment iacreuin, the aeoaraphic ar.. vi thin which the f... _, be spent _, affect the refund of fees. The ro.d impact fe. ordinanu provid.. th.t feu not .pent within six ,ear. of . the date of collection must be .pent within .ix Dlonth. of the property fo?: which the fee. vere collected requ.at1ns refund. or the fee. muat be returned to the property ownar. By incr.aetnl the area within which the.e feas _y be spant. the likelihood of tha fae. bainl .pent .., b. increased; and, thu., th! likelihood of a posdbla refund d.cre..... 'etition. for re.trlctina the expenditures of the f.e. to the I ...Uer zoae fro. ¥blcb they wer~ collected must be .ubmitted to the County by September 30. 1989, or all dcht. which _y exist for the restrict10Q 01 the expend1.ture ol the f.e. to the ._ll.r zone are waived. Detd18 of the debt. ane! reapondbll1.tiea _y b. found in . Ord1aance No. 88- . available Iro. the Cl.rk of th. Board of County \ eo-i..ioners. 301 N. Olive Avenue, Suite 210, 820-2996. Specific. queations resardina the pre.entatlon of a petition _, be obtained fro. the Traffic Dividon of ths County Engineerins D.partment, at 160 Australian Avenue, Rooa 303. 684-4030. . '-' '- .. , ~~... '\ tWIT" ~TY "\) 1\.."1 \. . ~ ~ .\\ PIIlH BEACH COUNTY ~ ') ~~ \ , ~ _.~- ~ .... . '" -.oJJ!\.' ~ ~ P i=~ B \' ..3 ~ 'K . \ ~ I -- t ¡i~ .\ A ~ ~ ') L- I \ ,~(.. ~ ~ u Q ¡ ~~- \- ,.~ ~ ã IOItRMt ~ \ awo. '1¡):: R o ""'" \ I! (~,( ". ~ I '. ~ ! ~'-P~(. , . w ~IH ši. \. 1"\ Ii! ~ f1 I 2- cç; \: I- i ! ~\ 2 OkEtoœŒ avo. . 8EL~J Z I 7 ". IÎÌ io- ," SCU1IÐIIt avo. 511.88.$11.7 SR...., 1/ ; J. J . , G \ m6'm1 vo. ~ '/ C !' ìi , , I l- . , . , . ~r - . t fi :1 't -.IfOIIIH 1:1110. ~ , 11 -.-.-.-.-.-.- I ;:. , ( ~ ! ~ LOll ""110. I 5. \. =rrl ~ I ~ HYI'IJLUXO AD ~ ... ~H .. ! j Jv - ~ ~ IOrNION [jIQ/ III -. I ~·-7 Jl ;..... I- K e! r- .1 ~ 1 Ah"" - µ u II ~ ROADS i 1\ .. ¡ / ...-.- .....- on ! Ii! 1:1 / :. .-. ð o-:~ . \ -~ ! ~......... ~ M ./ '[11' ~ .. t!: I .i: . 1: ~ P~H BEACH C~lY 5 - ~ "' DROWARD COUNty . III lVLJ 1--.( I . 5·'·~·,·· . . ..À;¡-,.___.\.. IWIT~ Cw.TY . ".... '\\...'-¡ \ ---------------- ._._._._._.-.-~-.-._.I ~~ ""- PN..I.I BEIOi COOiTY \-.. --.. ~~ ~\ _ """ 1OOH1_ ID.IS,'. IG$I \ \ '\ ~ ~ \~~~S~ ~ , ~ 0/ M \ \\ ~ ¡ ~J p\:'~ I i ~"-IIUllt I \1 IUD J:: . ËI '~~ I ~ ~ ~ .,' r ~ r~· ~... I . '., , / ¡ I~ ~ r ru I, i -. .E ..~._._.-._.- ~ <ISm ST. . .. . '\. i Iii ~ -- ¡-.l i i Iii-~ '\ ! ~ ~ i - .~~ ~ ~ Ii Clllt[CIQIŒ IUD. ~ : ! i en.-J L ~ "~~ _"'\'0. 511.101<511.7 5I.taI J/ : ..J,.. \ [II j ~ ,.,. roonl IIll VU. r' A . .. ; ~ ! J ::¡.~ I r . .. ,.: I ã 1i '" . loo[ _ II I RD. j \ 1111 :; -; -' . I. .. LNI....RD. I f. I l~ I . \ ~~ RI), : I - i ~ I t; t--.r ' ~ r) ! è IIOI'NIOII 8(.1C" .. W --------------------------- -- Î i ~ PARKS -.-.-. _ /"" I . i .~~ .~ :! I ~ ! I I ~ ! ~ \ .. i ClIlt IIOQII( -, / " I Ii I '" 1i /' ~~ ~ ~v- f è ,........ If' 0< '[v M ! P,lL1I BEACH crom '; ! r- 0 _._._._.-._._._.-._.-._._.~.. ~ BQOWARO COON!\' .... .-...- -.-.. ·"'!'t¡o: IIll..../o D""I~q . :0,..': >.......\ , IAARTIN COUNTY '\..\ ~'J \' - ,\, l\'I. -.., PILlA BEACH COUNTY ~ L.)_ ~':::i !\ , WlNCIOWN IID.ISR. *' r-.. "\ . ~ . ~'~!;\\ , e!~ ~\\ \ I! """'""-- i L-.- CD 1\ & ~ ~ ! ~~l__ I\..'~ (5) i~! It- ,( ".', § ~. ITu / :; - i -~~. ... <SIH 51. I tõ : fii t¡\ ~ h... ~ .. ; \V . fiif- t: i ' ...._~" I.....¡ ... i . ~ , i CMCNOIIEEaw. ! r-.\. . I ! ) 1n-..1 L - / . J L soo'_ aw. SR.80JC9t.7 ¡",98I1 I 1/ : \ I 1 ~ . A . rCRSr...l w. f ~ I r r"\ -: J :¡.~! c ~ !¡........ i '1 \ .., l...._ ::¡ ( ;;::> I.. UllOIAICD. I ~. II1PQ.UXO IID~' 1 H \ I - i ~ ~ f-...... ~ ~ I o;;! IIOTII'ON lIE"" ..W I · . -.. I'. ..-" r- .-..- 1-· I l~ I _ I e! ,-., - ;¡¡ AI ",I" .... 1;1 1 Q) SCHOOL -..-... I ; @)! \ . a.t<T IIOOAE MI. / ~ I: / , :..."...; ~ ¡-v- " ~ ~....,... (( . 0( V Lv ... ~ L .~ PAllA BEACH COUNty " ~ t-- , ~ @ -.-.,-.,-..-..-. ...-- ~ BROWAAD COUNTY I -;;¡- I~ t1 .. \L r~~'~ - . "- - ~ rl ::;;;'~:: 1 . '" (j .:.... ,_ fI-":. n ! ~~ \ I ~ ~~, I ~ ~ \ ~ 1'1~:o ~ ...- r_r\~ J I'~ ," . ~ [~ . ". /lUl1OOI \. ...~ 1--· ..... .....1 M ... -;; íir:1 ".::-,...,~ .......... I :"~ '. '. '. .:'C"'ln ',t?~ \ ~,.::i:';" \_/lUl1OOI · ':hri I 't.,o ":, ~.... I !"11~~.r¡r' 'Ä " ,,' "''''' J7/" @ . ..,.....,....., " ··:·U',; ':~ ~ ~, ~,,~~t .,' ·n.·".,., ~ ;.,':,:,; ~ "~~¡;:I" I ~ I0OI_ ,:/).\)'> ':::,.' .'~ '~... . :.~. ~ , ..:::.. ~ ~~c~; "\~~~- ~I - '. ~, ' ", . . . :..i· '. I I., .;.~ j :'. : .,.< , ..' ". '",. . ' . ;:,,',.',".:,";, ~ .' . ! .:i' 'i,¡· <:':,.' ,"":', " ,j'. ··;:.f ',:..:;:',: ':":';~;rr- ~':~ " ',)~;, ~ ~ . 1,""'"" :\~. ..J · Fr' . ,,":'.<, :(' ., ", " . 2:" .', L._ ...- I" ...~ r . . ','. ...... 'L ~ 1;/ -''¡:''¿( j:; 11 O"'/uUIIJ 'iY ..od. lit I; I ';':',.¿,;I /.'.¿ ... ft_ 21 \ r 1 / ....'l:J"~ .. 'Ir 'H'::r: ,~;' 11W' · -.... ~, i ~...... ~ /._ 3~ '~',',"'-,' ,I" ~ I ~ '. . .. 'I ""' ... I 1..(; i.-- . .... !~'--¡w,: '. ;. : ' , ::;- "''''r ~~ .... ,," , IG~ ,-' .- , u-..· 'II:. m '"" "-u II ;" . i .,..- f0 (f< ~ I ~~I.j¡;;·;:, ,.. '-'... "I.zr,·:', ....IIUIUII ..', jl I_...~.- J ',:' } I ) . '. . J, .' 1 '.. ' ~ ~ / µ ", ,.' . I / J:j... '.: I :;.. '- . u_ __ -=- ':. IIŒ I 'j j. . . ::¡--" - 1 .: . . nrJIS . ....h- M. I... ~ I I· . ;..~ I j . i - Q . . . .LJ~. ~. /1_ , " , J LIBRARY ... .. t'~~, .... ' non-shaded area I I ~ .' ..... !~ J1 i ... ~ '. '" . I>uoøUII í .. 7'" , .' i ~ ~l,. . I .. J ! .... .. ..... ... /' T ZJ I 1. pc.,. fa \ . ! L· , .~ I ! ':~:_ r~~ .. I . ",',' ~.. , . . . ! . .., J , 1 ;'.'<~'·"a';' '.!;-\~.¡: - '.. I ~...., - .. .. ] I '- A 1 . I FIRE-RESCUE ... . '. non-shaded I area ! ,.. iOIO IDOl I .~ " .., 1 I I , - . :.i~~~':";<¡?;¡:'iŒ¡1¡.~tJ:'U:.: ',', '(;þ 'CJ ..'~';'D1"~P ~ , ·..···;t..~I¡· . :~ ,....;::~~. ~~.. i , '¡:',' . _ D ¡ · :.., d::J. 1 I I --'l!L___---!!!!!<. I ~ ! .......... ì I ! i j "- I . ) I I LA W ENFORCEMENT I , ZONE ~ . I non-shaded area .. UNlIUDI I ,,# ... I ) , . ; , j, . 2r-.. " \ ! UNIT" CWfTY ,-, ~'ì \' , . ,~ ~ ""'- . PAI.U 8(~ COUNTY "'" - ") ~'\:.: . \ ""'- NIlANI_ l1li. ($.R. 7C1fi' \\ h TI\.. \ ~ \tJ:~3;\ ~ \ ~¡ . (í ~ \ ,;,1\(. r- 1~ ! i ~~ ~~ '-p\~ ~ i I .~~-~ \.~'$ "'-/u ~ [-- ( .', ~. I ~ 1!1'" r \" , . , .. .......,). 7 '\!i; I ¡ ¡ 45'" $1. ~ '" l " ~ ___ \-\:.1. 1 Ri' ._~ ì a ' - i~ ,~ Ii 1JI<£t0Q!(t avo. ~ ~ i . i IIn_J L L.--.- I-~ . ¡ SQ/ I(IIIIII.VO. i<RaoKSIl7 5ua~ J/ : .J \ ,/ ~ \' \...... . \ rlll61 HU. VII. r I . t : ~ I t: l :if ¡ ä ~ ~ 1~ ! 3 l.....ORH ""; ";:0 I L - lOll .... l1li. 5 . \ KtPO-UXOIIII; l . I -) I ~ , t: >--/ '. < ~ \I I r:. 8OTIIIOH 11(0 II. VO j I ~ 1/ I :! , I .'....,.. ".. I S ¡ LAW ENFORCEMENT T S COUNTY-WIDE ... \ .. iii ! ZONE 1 ; / Q.tIII1OO11[ ..... ! ~ /'~¡ ;~ i V- 71 : ; c:~_..,r (( \ ~/ : .-' Tê? '^ ~- ( ... ! PÞJ.U BEACH COUNTY _ . _ ~ i , . '& OHOWNID COUNTY ...l_ ~ JP" i'-J I ~ 1 I . I I ~ . ~ >.1 \ \. _..~ ~T~_~~ Y ~~~ " PAlU nUlU COlJ!11Y ~ h D~~ . ~ I4'N4'~ AlliS tit. ,., ~. -- --.---.-...-. ---1"-.... \61- ~ ~ t\" - -0< ~ ~M " - \ ..~ ~ . .~ ~ '--1 \ i! ) ~ g ~ '\" ~ A' p \'\: ; ~ i i I.....'..M£ I \ 11..\'0. '("" , ""-U ~ t~ . .', . ~. .. I ! ~ ~ I ,. I P'l 1\ ~ \ ~~J .. "- . ~ """- \- 1 ; &îc...~ TI I ¡ i- ~ Y; - ~ "" . I ~ OICUOIOlltt 111.\'0. I -TL / ! 8EI.'I[!I(..I ~ ¡.: . , SOUIJON 11..\'0. ~.1O.SR.71 ¡lUa. T/ ~ I :7 \ ,_~ ~ (, -= ; ! .. ~ I I'!; r'":'". ¡, I : ~ ~'~ ~ I~ on I ~ ~ .... \M(.0f!: " I :; I \ L I, l'" OIA 110. If. " - ï '[ tm'OlUlO 110. !;i ! M f ~ '- ~ ~ .. ~:...- I i If ¡ c! BOYNTON SUCH 111.\'0 , / i ~ I ~ PUBLIC BUILDINGS, .. - . 1 _p g ¡ I II ! .. 1\ ~ ! 0...'IlOOII(.... ~ / I I ~ /'!-. :...,... i \-r--/ .¿ ~ ._<w ; \:/'[v :; PAlM BEACH Coc.wTY ; ! r- ~ OROWARD coc.wry IU_ ,vn r~ . EXHIBIT E . AVAILABLE IMPACT FEE CREDIT ANALYSIS Road Impact Fee Credit Road Impact Fee Zone -A- 1,769,034 Road Impact Fee Zone -B- 17,635 Road Impact Fee Zone -C- 179,487 Road Impact Fee Zone -D- 46,621 Road Impact Fee Zone -E- , 328,847 Road Impact Fee Zone -P 842,787 Road Impact Fee Zone -G- 1,354,605 Road Impact Fee Zone -t;- 340,889 I Road Impact Fee Zone -I- 6,883,014 i Road Impact Fee Zone -J- 9,354 ) Road Impact Fee Zone -K- 3,903,107 \ Road Impact Fee Zone -M- 4,225,997 Total Road Impact Fee Credit $19,901,377 I School Impact Fee Credit ¡ School Impact Fee Zone 1 485 I ) School Impact Fee Zone 2 369,463 School Impact Fee Zone 3 675,239 j School Impact Fee Zone 4 359.575 Total School Impact Fee Credit $1,404,762 I Park Impact Fee Credit I Park Impact Fee Zone 1 39,144 Park Impact Fee Zone 2 195,661 ¡ Park Impact Fee Zone 3 1 ,974,961 j Total Park Impact Credit $2,209,766 ¡ ! Total Fire Rescue Impact Fee Credit $2,540 I Total Libraries Impact Fee Credit $1,939 Total Public Buildings Impact Fee Credit $7,027 I Total Law County-wide Impact Fee Credit $781 ¡ I Total Law Patrol Impact Fee Credit $212 j ¡ ¡ Total Available Impact Fee Credit $23,528,404 . , J , , . . EXHIBIT F ~ \ . " Park Impact Fee UnincorporatedArea & Schedule uN Residential (ft2) Current Fee 1994 Costs % Change 600 and Under 362.24 466.24 35% 601 - 1,399 466.63 595.42 26% 1,400 - 1.999 616.71 749.33 22% 2,000 - 3,599 766.81 903.25 ' 18% 3,600 and Over 998.16 1,140.83 14% Hotel/Motel and ACLF 139.27 260.49 87% Hotel/Motel occupancy rate calculated at 50% of act~,al cost Schedule "A" consist of the Unincorporated Area and the following municipalities: Atlantis, Cloud Lake, Glen Ridge, Golf Village. Golfview, Haverhill. Hypoluxo. Lake Clarke Shores, and Mangonia Park Park Impact Fee Schedule "B" I \ 800 and Under 337.82 447.35 32% 801 - 1,399 436.66 545.55 25% 1,400 - 1,999 579.24 686.58 19% \ 2,000 - 3,599 721.65 827.60 15% 3,600 and Over 941.13 1,045.28 11% Hotel/Motel and ACLF 126.28 238.67 89% , ¡ Schedule "B" consist of Greenacres, Lake Park, and Palm Springs \ , 4 Park Impact Fee Schedule"E" ! ; 800 and Under 264.59 324.68 23% 801 - 1,399 347.57 395.95 14% 1,400- 1,999 466.87 498.30 7% I 2,000 - 3,599 586.17 600.65 2% i I ' 3,600 and Over 770.06 758.64 -1% Hotel/Motel and ACLF 87.36 173.22 98% \ \ Schedule "E" consist of West Palm Beach, Palm Beach Gardens and Royal Palm Beach I , Park Impact Fee Schedule "F" ' . I \ . \ 800 and Under 316;38 437.50 38% - 801 - 1,399 41 0.71 533.53 30% 1,400 - 1,999 546.34 671.45 23% 2,000 ~ 3,599 681.98 e09.37 19% \ 3,600 and Over 891 :03 1,022.25 15% Hotel/Motel and ACLF 114.89 233.42 ·,03% Schedule "F" consist of Gulfstream, Highland Beach, Manalapan and South Palm Beach \ \ . r." ':}~~ I ." . ¿'jti~ ." /".. , r " . Park Impact Fee Schedule "I" Residential (ft2) Current Fee 1994 Costs % Change 800 and Under 243. 14 314.82 29% 801 - 1 ,399 321.42 383.93 19% 1,400 - 1,999 433.96 483. 1 7 11% 2,000 - 3,599 546.50 582.4 1 7% 3,600 and Over 719.97 735.61 2% Hotel/Motel and ACLF 75.96 167.96 121% ! Schedule "I" consist of Tequesta Park Impact Fee Schedule "J" 800 and Under 218.73 273.93 25% 801 - 1,399 291.65 334.06 15% 1,400 - 1,999 396.49 420.41 6% 2,000 - 3,599 501.33 506.76 1% 3,600 and Over 662.94 640.06 " -3% I Hotel/Motel and ACLF 62.99 146.15 132'% ì Schedule "J" consist of North Palm Beach Park Impact Fee Schedule "K" , 800 and Under 270.52 386.73 43% \ 801 - 1,399 354.80 471.63 33% 1,400 - 1,999 475.97 593.54 25% I 2,000 - 3,599 597.14 715.45 20% 3,600 and Over 783.91 903.64 15% \ Hotel/Motel and ACLF 90.52 206.33 128% Schedule "K" consist of Ocean Ridge I ! \ Park Impact Fee Schedule "P" I , I 800 and Under 172.87 223. 17 29% i 801 - 1.399 235.73 272. 15 15% 1.400 - 1.999 326.12 342.50 5% I 2,000 - 3,599 416.50 412.85 -1% 3.600 and Over 555.81 521.45 -6% J Hotel/Motel and ACLF 38.61 , 119.06 208% . I Schedule "P" consist of Briny Breezes, Juno Beach, Jupiter Inlet Colony, and Palm Beach ! , .. Shores Park Impact Fee Schedule "U" 800 and Under 178.80 285.22 60% 801 - 1,399 242.96 347.83 43% 1,400 - 1,999 335.22 437.75 31% 2,000 - 3.599 427.47 527.66 23% 3,600 and Over 569.67 666.46 17% Hotel/Motel and ACLF 41.75 152.17 264% i Schedule "U" consist of Town of Lantana I . ,I " " . Park Impact Fee Schedule .W" I I Residential (ft2) Current Fee 1994 Costs % Change 1 I \ 800 and Under 129.99 203.44 57% 801 - 1,399 183.45 248.10 35% 1 1,400 - 1,999 260.30 312,23 20% I 2,000 - 3,599 337.16 376.36 12% I 3,600 and Over 455.63 475.36 4% , Hotel/Motel and ACLF 15.81 1 08.54 587% Schedule ·W" consist of Riviera Beach Park Impact Fee Schedule "X" 800 and Under 1 05.57 162.55 54% 801 - 1,399 153.67 198.23 29% I 1,400 - 1,999 222. 83 249.47 . 12% I 2,000 - 3,599 292.00 300.71 3% 3,600 and Over 398.60 379.81 -5% 1 Hotel/Motel and ACLF 2.63 86.72 2964% Schedule "X" consist of the Town of Palm Beach , I Park Impact Fee Schedule "yo I , \ 800 and Under 81.16 121.65 50% 801 - 1 ,399 123.91 148.36 20% 1,400 - 1,999 185.36 186.71 1% 2,000 - 3,599 246.83 225.06 -9% 3,600 and Over 341.56 284.26 -17% Hotel/Motel and ACLF 0.00 64.90 --- " Schedule "Y" consist of Boca Raton, Boynton Beach, DeJray Beach, Lake Worth, and Jupit, I I i I I 1 . - I I I I I , . . . Libraries Impact Fee Schedule Current Residential (ft2) Fee 1 994 Costs % Change 800 and Under 24.01 137.83 474% 801 - 1,399 38.12 168.08 341% 1,400 - 1,999 58.43 211.54 262<'~ 2,000 - 3,599 78.74 254.99 224% 3.600 and Over 110.04 322.05 193% Educationallmpact Fee Schedule 800 and Under 96.11 . 198.00 . 106% 801 - 1 ,399 140.25 291.00 107% 1,400 - 1,999 356.01 735.00 106% 2,000 - 3,599 571.78 1.177.00 106% 3,600 and Over 918.95 1,892.00 106% Law EnforcementCountywide - I I 800 and Under 4.35 0.00 -100% 801 - 1,399 5.30 0.00 -100% 1,400 - 1,999 6.67 0.00 - 1 00% 2,000 - 3,599 8.04 0.00 -100% . 3,600 and Over 10.16 0.00 - 100% \ Hotel/rylotel and ACLF 1.85 0.00 -100% \ , Non-Residential Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. \ Office 100,000 6.10 0.00 - 1 00% 150,000 5.63 0.00 - 100% 200,000 5.43 0.00 - 100% I Medical Office, 8.85 0.00 -100% j I Warehouse 1.03 0.00 - 1 00% J General Industrial 1.23 , 0.00 - 100% ! Retail !" - 80,000 and Under 10.01 0.00 -100% 80,001 - 99.999 11.01 0.00 -100% 100,000 - 199,999 11.07 0.00 - 1 00% 200,000 - 499,999 10.62 0.00 -100% 500,000 - 999,999 10.15 0.00 - 1 00% 1,000,000 and Over 10.04 0.00 - 100% .f ..-- .....~-- ."' /. . \ . . Public Buildings Current Fee 1994 Costs % Change . Residental (Ft. 2) 800 and Under 38.80 62.99 62% 801 - 1,399 51.76 76.81 48% 1,400 - 1,999 70.39 96.70 37% 2,000 - 3,599 89.02 116.53 31% 3,600 and Over 1 17.75 147.18 25% Hotel/Motel and ACLF 4.64 26.88 455% Non-Residential Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. Office 100,000 66.73 70.90 6% 150,000 63.14 69.43 10% 200,000 57.74 67.37 17% Medical Office 1 04.14 , 26.89 '. 22% Warehouse 4.41 20.04 354% General Industrial 7.18 38.48 436% Retail . 100,000 13' .45 1 68.23 28% 200,000 125.46 168.15 34% 500,000 118.98 172.52 45% 1,000,000 117.57 176.67 50% ' Fire Rescue Impact Fee ! Single Family Detached 83.03 92.48 '1% ! . Single Family Att., Per Unit 90.45 97.59 8% i Mulit- Family, Per Unit 27.13 29.67 9% Mobile Home 26.11 28.42 9% ! Hotel/Motel and ACLF 28.30 39.14 38% i Non-Residential Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. I Office I 100,000 57.97 67.88 17% 150,000 58.60 68.17 16% I 200,000 59.56 . 68.59 15% Medical Office 51.39 56.63 10% - Warehouse 9% 27.60 29.96 General Industrial 200.1 1 222. 02 11% Retail 100,000 82.50 89.52 9% 200,000 83.54 89.54 7% 500,000 84.69 88.66 5% , '. ",;....: , . .." . -<.~ ".'..' ~.'; ·~,r'¡"· .~,...;; " I '" . . . Law Enforcement Patrol Current 1 Residential (ft.2) Fee 1994 Costs % Change Single Family Detached 79.14 105.59 33% Single Family Att., Per Unit 79.14 105.59 33% Mulit-Family, Per Unit 10.33 13.77 33% Mobile Home 10.33 13.77 33% Hotel/Motel.and ACLF 79.14 1 05.59 33% Non-Residential Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. Office 100,000 155.71 207.75 33% 150,000 155.71 207.75 33% 200,000 155.71 207.75 33% Medical Office 155.71 207.75 33% I, Warehouse 25.81 34.43 . 33% i General Industrial 25.81 " 34.43 33% 1 Retail I 100,000 155.71 207.75 33% I 200,000 155.71 207.75 33% 500,000 155.71 207.75 33% 1,000,000 155.71 207.75 33% , Road Impact Fee ! Single Family Detached 1,650.00 3,760.00 128% i Single Family Att., Per Unit 1,155.00 2,632.00 1 28"10 Congregate Unit (per unit) 353.93 807.00 128% I Mobile Home 825.00 1,880.00 128% \ Non-Residential Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. ¡ \ Office 100,000 771.65 2,426.00 214% I 150,000 699.05 2,198.00 214% 200,000 651.75 2,050.00 215% Medical Office 1,879.35 5,910.00 214% General Industrial 383.35 ' 1,174.00 206% L Warehouse 268.40 844.00 214% - Retail 1 CX),OOO 2,215.50 7,586.00 242% 200,000 1,768.53 6,777.00 283% 500,000 1,403.00 4,722.00 237% 1,000,000 1,359.01 4,669.00 244% "':,.-: ì \ . , I.. . I . .. .,.- - ~ .' Solid Waste (New Fee) Time Value Approach Landfill Residential (Per Unit) Landfill Costs Single Family Detached 120.02 Multi-Family Unit - Low Density 48.25 Multi-Family Unit - High Density 31.36 Mobile Home 66.76 Non-Residential Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. Office Space 125.75 Medical Office 125.75 . General Industrial 125.75 Retail Space 125.75 Service Stations Per Pump 476.76 Convenience Retail 476.78 Fast Food 476.78 Supermarket 476.78 Restaurants 476.78 ". , Facilities Cost Approach All Only Residential Facilities Landfill Costs Costs Single Family Detached 314.71 115.12 Multi-Family Unit - Low Density 126.52 46.28 Multi-Family Unit - High Density" 82.24 30.08 Mobile. Home 180.28 65.95 '. Non- Residential Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. I Office Space ! 329.73 120.61 Medical Office 329.73 120.61 General Industrial 329.73 120.61 Retail Space 329.73 120.61 Service Stations (Per Pump) ,1,250.13 457.29 Convenience Retail 1,250.13 457.29 Fast Food 1,250.13 457.29 Supermarket 1,250.13 457.29 - Restaurants , " ;:j;,> " - ·Ó~~·) '.~à>;( ,";" ",0 .. " , { 1<- t'^lv) MEMORANDUM To: David T. Harden, City Manager From: Joseph M. sa~Finance Director Date: July 8, 1994 Subject: Parkinq In Lieu Fees Account In the past, the City deposited "Parking In Lieu Fees" in a separate line item account within the General Fund and any interest earnings accrued to the General Fund. It is our recommendation that this line item be transferred to the 115 Special Projects Fund where the interest earnings can be accrued to the Parking In Lieu Fee Account. This would also respond to the Parking Management Team request. Although either method is acceptable, we will move the balance in this account from the General Fund and place it into a separate interest bearing account if we don't hear differently from your office. Please call if you have any further questions. ~ - ~~ (éL/7H/lI/710V s) W5 3 I ., .. t: MEMORANDUM To: Diane Dominguez Director of Planning & Zoning From: Joseph M. s~ Director of <1 . , Date: March 22, 1994 Subject: Downtown Development Authoritv- In LÜ:u Account Per your correspondEnce and request for .i nformation on the in- lieu account dated ~arch 21, 1994, we s111 ,mi t this response, The current balanc,'! in the in -lieu aCC01tl, t i.s $15,554, The history of the account is as follows: .. Deposit of $60,000 from Delray ßeach Library (June, 1984) Spent $25,000 for:parking study (August, 1989) Spent $24,446 for decorative liqhting (October, 1992) Deposit of $2,500 Mouw Associates (February, 1994) Deposit of :1:2,500 Computer Parts Outlet (February, 1994) There has been several di.scussions relative to the rights of the Downtown Development l\uthority versus thß Ci.ty of Delray Beach regarding who may spel ld ther;e funds, A :3ummatÌ(¡l1 of this is attached to provide y()U with some additional background material so that you have a bel.ter understanding of these issues. ~. , i Please contact this 0 fice if you have any further questions, cc: David T, Harden, City Manager encl: Parking Managemen t 'Peam - Trus t Fund Request dated July 20, 1993 ~ , .. ,..~ ~___4 r (, " . ,. \ ; , . ~ .; , " M E M 0 R A' N DUM ¡ , I, TO: David T. Harden ',' , " City 'Manager , , (', , , . ~ROlh Joe.ph M. f.,~, £QN..', ' " , Director Of Fln'[3,©-'; : " SUBJECT: .Parking Mana<;¡ement Team -'TrUst Fund Reques~ , DATE: July 20, 1993 . ; . ' . " This memorandum is meant to provide our recommendations concerning the request of Kevin ~gan as Chairman of the Parking Management Team (PMT)' to create a "Parking Trust Fund". The PMT recommends that this Trust Fund be initiålly funded with the balance of the" In-Lieu Parking Fees, that future in-lieu' parlting fees be c;leposited into this Trust, Fund and that the PMT will provide subsequent reconwendations on further funding. ' " U . 'i' A. The In-Lieu::Parking Fees, Account was established in June 1984 'with ,the deposit o'f "$60,000 from the: Delray- 'Beach Library. At that time, the I Downtown Development Authority was given the authority to receive and expend these fees. B. In March 1985; the city Commission (throngh Ordinance Number 31-85) amended the' City' Code to allo\,ol for the in-lieu parking fees to be . received by the City and that the City Commission would expend these funds. At that time the city Attorney advised that the funds collected prior to this Ordinance were .not subject to its cpnditions: and, t.herefore, the monies deposited in 1984 could be spent by thn Downtown Development Authority, but: must be spent: on parking . "j C. Iii June 1986, the City Commission (I:hrough Ordinance Number 33-86) clarified that the City was to receiveln-lleu parking f~es and that the City Commissio~ was to determine the ns~ of those fees. D. In August: 1989, the City 'expended $25,000 of the $60,~OO of in"-lieu parking fees on a master parking plan leaving a balance of $35,000. E. In October 1992, the, ci'ty, Commission approved $30,622 of the in-lieu parking fees to be (¡sed for decorative street lights for municipal parking lots in the downtown area. The total :actual invoice from the Community Redevelopment Agency' for thi.EI lighting, however; waa only $24,446. Thia leaves a current balance in the In-Lieu Parking Feeß Account of $10,554. \ \ Because of ~he paat controversy surround.ing the, appropriate rights, to,' receive ì these funds ¡ and approve when and how ,they: shou ld be spent", I would rE;!cominenâ j , th&t these ;funds remain under the contro~ of i:hecity Commission. However, , ~ the city Commission· could relinquish .....control . of these funds through an ¡ , Ordi.nance revision (as was done in the past),' if ,they BO desire. , ~ . '\ 1 ,.-.. Community '--1.1 Redevelopment _a Agency -à> Delray Beach ....-- July S, 1994 Mr. David Harden City Manag~r City of Delray Reach 100 NW 1st Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 RE: In-Lieu Parking Account Dear Dave: As a result of a meeting of the Parking Management Team on June 16th, Commissioner Smilh recommended that the in-lieu parking account, which is now a part of the City's geD~Ial fund, be an item for discussion at the next scbeduled City Workshop meeting on July 12th. The PMT feels these ñmds should be kept in a separate, interest bearing account. Since our next PMT meeting is scheduled for July 21st, we would like to have a workshop meeting with the City prior to that meeting, free to call me if you have any questions. -~------ Christopher J. Brown Executive Director /d 07 ~, Atlantic Avenue. Delray BeacR, :l3:]444 (407) 276·8640 I Fax (407) 216-8558 :Od :\\<IV<Htd gOGHl:n .g, · I MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER fd-f/1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # WS 4 - MEETING OF JULY 12, 1994 POMPEY PARK BASKETBALL COURT/LIGHTING DATE: JULY 8, 1994 One of the improvements which has been requested at Pompey Park is to put lights on the outdoor basketball courts. The attached proposal is before the Commission for consensus as to whether to proceed now with Thompson Engineering Consultants for lighting the Pompey Park basketball court, or to add it to next year's Capital Improvement budget. The cost of construction would be $26,500 and $2,100 for engineer- ing, for a total project cost of $28,600. If we proceed now, we would fund it out of the City Manager's Contingency Fund. ~/ /(/1(Y-ULJ/ ~ ¿V/~~ !?¡u~ i-~ . [ITY DF DELAAY BEA£H 100 N.W. 1st AVENUE . DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 . 407/243- 7000 b:a:d AlJ.AnøtcaClty " II I! 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: David Harden City Manager FROM: Joe Weldon Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Thompson Engineering Cost Estimates for Pompey Park Basketball DATE: June 21, 1994 Attached please find a letter from Thompson Engineering outlining the cost to light the outdoor basketball courts at Pompey Park in the amount of $26,500 for construction and $2,100 for engineering. Please review and advise. Parks and Recreation Attachment JW:cp Ref:dhteppbb THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS ~ ,~ - - - - - -- - HYAC - -- PLUMQING - - - - - -- ELéCTFllCAL - - TJ.10MPSON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS June 15, 1994 City of Delray Beach Parks & Recreation Department 50 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 Attn: Mr. Joe Weldon Director Re: pompey Park Basketball Court Lighting Dear Joe: I've lookeð at the above referenced area of Pompey Park and I believe (preliminary) that we can get power to light the basketball courts either from the main building or the pool bUilding. We oan determine which is best during design. My preliminary estimate is that we could light the courts using poles with two 1000 watt fixtures each. This woul6 price out at around $26,500.00 for the poles and pole bases, fixtures, conduit and wiring, distribution panel board, lighting contractors, trenching contractors overhead and profit. In other words, this should be the cost complete. Fees for professional engineering services to design the system, prepare working drawings and speoifications will be $1,300.00. Construction administration services required to: review bid proposals, review shop drawings and manufacturer's submittal data, review the construction for compliance with the documents, certify contractor pay applications and final payment requests, will be $800.00. The total cost for engineering service will þe $2,100.00. If loan be of further servioe in this matter, please call. I f you would like us to proceed with this work, let me know when to start and when you are looking for completion. Yours truly, ~ £~¿on, pr-- DET/bb 25 SEABREEZE AVENUE, SUITE 202 DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA 33483 (407) 274-0200 FAX: (407) 274-0222 ,