Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
09-11-94 Special/Workshop
I DElRA' BE~CH CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA - CITY COMMISSION ........ AII·America City SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING - OCTOBER 11. 1994 - 6:00 P.M. \'111' COMMISSION CHAMBERS The City will furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph 243-7127 (voice) , or 243-7199 ( TDD) , at least 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices available for meetings in the Commission Chamber. Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such person will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. The City neither provides nor prepares such record. SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 1. REJECTION OF BIDS/FIRE STATIONS #3 AND #4: Consider rejecting all bids received by the City on July 20, 1994. for the renovation and addition work on Fire Stations #3 and #4. 2. LEASE AGREEMENT WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY/MORIKAMI PARK WELLFIELD: Consider approval of a 99 year lease agreement between the City and Palm Beach County relative to the siting and operation of the Morikami Park wellfield. 3 . BID AWARD/VETERANS PARK PHASE II: Consider award of construction contract to DiPompeo Construction Corp., lowest responsive and responsible bidder, for the Veterans Park Phase II project in the amount of $300,700.00; with funding from Decade of Excellence Phase II - Redevelopment of Veterans' Park Phase II (Account No. 228-4126-572-61.63) . 4. BID AWARD/GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE KITCHEN EOUIPMENT: Consider award of bid to Choice Restaurant Equipment and Supply for the kitchen equipment at the Golf Course Clubhouse, in an amount not to exceed $150,000.00; with funding from Golf Course Clubhouse - Furniture and Fixtures (Account No. 445-4763-572-64.10) . 5. BID AWARD/TENNIS CENTER PHASE III: Consider bid award for the Tennis Center Phase III project (permanent seating and toilet facilities) . ~M~!!o~/icf¥ City Clerk WORKSHOP AGENDA 1. Brainstorming session on ways in which the City could assist charitable organizations and special event groups in raising funds to support their programs. 2 . Discussion regarding annexation of properties within the City's planning reserve area west of Military Trail. 3 . Alternatives for provision of required water storage capacity in the City's southwest area, per the Water Distribution Master Plan recommendations. 4. Review and comment on F.D.O.T.'s revised plans for the North Federal Highway resurfacing and median modifications project (from Bond Way north to the City limits) . 5. Commission Comments. t · - MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: (CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 5 P .1 - MEETING OF OCTOBER 11. 1994 REJECTION OF BIDS/FIRE STATIONS #3 AND #4 DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1994 This is before the Commission to consider rejection of all bids received for the renovation and addition work on Fire Stations #3 and #4. Funding is not sufficient to do the full scope of the required project. Above ground fuel tanks were installed at Station #3 to meet new DERM requirements. This project was funded from the bond account but was not part of the original bond estimate for the scope or cost. The alternative would be to award the bid for Station #3 only, and not do any work on Station #4. After reviewing plans and bids we feel we can revise the plans, make changes, and rebid. Recommend that we reject all bids and that staff be allowed to review the project in detail to reduce costs by reducing the project scope. We will also look for additional funding. The new above-ground fuel system at Station #3 was funded from the Decade of Excellence, but I do not believe it was originally envisioned as part of the Decade of Excellence work at this station. iI1~ & /U.¡j.6/ /;dw 5-0 ,. . Agenda Item No. AGENDA REQUEST Date: October 4, 1994 Request to be placed on: Regular Agenda Special Agenda __x__ Workshop Agenda When: October 11, 1994 . Recommendation: Staff recommends City Commission reject all submitted bids on station #3 & #4 due to lack of sufficient funding. ~ ~ Department head signature:~ .o~.e_~;J /q/V'/4';I Determination of Consistency wi th Comprehensi ve Plan: Ci ty Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) : Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): Funding available: YES/NO Funding alternatives (if applicable) Account No. & Description Account Balance City Manager Review: @ ~ ø-. ~~ ~ Approved. for agenda: E YN0:lii# ~ ~ . ~ ..;.. Hold Untl1: . Atl., (£ ~ ~ ~ Agenda co,?rdinator Review: ~~ ~ ~ ~ Recemd: . ~~ ~ Placed on Agenda: ~ - .5..-.., ~_ Action: ~ ~~~~ Approved/Disapproved ~. ~ fL ~* - ~ , \esd\9361/62\agrql0ll . . ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: David T. Harden City Manager ~ From: William H. Greenwood ~#l Director of Environmental Services Date: October 4, 1994 Subject: Aqenda Request Fire Station #3 & #4 Rejection of Bids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On July 20, 1994, the City received the attached bids for Fire Station #3 and #4. Over the next several weeks, City staff, including those from the Fire Department, reviewed the bids in efforts to determine the best way to proceed with the project with the available funds. After numerous discussions, and due to the fact that the contractors are not required to hold their bids more than 60 days, it is staff's recommendation that the bids be rejected at this time and that at some future date the project be re-bid. cc: Jose Aguila Chief Rehr Chief Wigderson File 93-61 (D) 93-62 (D) . · . SUBJECT BIDS: Per memorandum from David Miller and Associates, P .A., dated July 21, 1994. Base bids and alternates are somewhat higher then anticipated, due in part to current construction market place being less competitive. Based on current bond monies available we recommend that only one project be completed at this time. FIRE STATION #3 PROJECT NUMBER 93-61 Budget data from revised memo from Jose Aguila, Asst. Construction Manager, dated July 7, 1994. A V AILABLE FUNDS: Fire Headquarters $30,000. Fire Station #3 268,132. Fire Station #4 74,650. TOTAL = $372,782 Fire Station #3 project should be awarded in two (2) parts in order to take advantage of low bids for both the Fire Station and the Service Building. LOW BID FOR FIRE STATION #3: YOUNG DEVELOPMENT INC. A-I STATION & ADDITION $250,153. A-4 OFFICERS QUARTERS 823. A-8 WASH DOWN AREA 3,479. A-IO HURRICANE SHUTTERS 1,409. TOTAL = $255,864. ,. , .' LOW BID FOR SERVICE BUILDING: RPM GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC. A-I-A DORMITORY LOCKERS $13,317 A-2 SERVICE BUILDING 95,192 A-5 MEZZANINE, STAIRS, RAILING 5,620 A-6 OVERHEAD HOIST 7,468 TOTAL = $121,597 $121,597 TOTAL PROJECT 377,461 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 372,782 DEBIT -$4,679 LOW BID FOR FIRE STATION #4 FIVE STAR B-1 STATION REDO & ADDITIONS $113,683 B-5 RE-ROOF EXISTING ROOF 9,365 B-6 RE-P AINT EXISTING AREAS 1,900 B-7 HURRICANE SHUTTERS 5,600 SUB-TOTAL $130,548 B-8 INTERIOR REMODEL 41,185 B-9 LOCKERS 7,390 TOTAL = $179,123 þ , " . David Miller and Ass 0 cia t e s, P.A. MEMORANDUM David R. Miller, A.LA. DATE: July 21, 1994 TO: Jose Aguila, Asst. Const. Mgr. City of Del ray Beach 434 S. Swinton Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 . FROM: David Miller '. PROJECT: FIRE STATI N #3 & 4 PROJECT NUMBER 93~61 & 93-62 SUBJECT: BIDS I have reviewed the bids for the above referenced projects. Attached please find a tabulation indicating base bids amounts as welJ as bid alternates for each of the bidders. The bids are somewhat higher than was anticipated; this is due in part to the current construction market place being less competitive, as welJ as the complexity of these projects. Conclusions and recommendations for each of the two projects is as follows: Station #3 - Based upon the attached bid tabulation the apparent low bidder would be either Young Development, Inc. or O'Connor and Taylor, Inc. Their base bids are within 2 1/2% of each other. The cost for the individual alternates are also exceptionally close. Both bid proposals appear to be complete and in order. Station #4 - The apparent low bidder is Five Star Construction, Inc. Their base bid cost is significantly below the next two low bidders who were within 2% of each other. Their bid proposal appears to be complete and in order. The references and comparable projects should be reviewed and verified. My recommendations for these two projects are as folJows: The construction relating to the updating each ofthe stations should be undertaken, based upon available funds for construction. At these two stations appropriate alternates should also be accepted. The service building construction should be undertaken as additional funds are available for this work. I would like to propose that we meet with ChiefRehr to review these costs and make a formal recommendation as to which scope of work is appropriate to undertake at this time, and which scope should be undertaken at a future date as additional monies are made available. Architecture . Planning . Construction Management Interior Design 105 South Narcissus Avenue 'West Plllm Belich' Flol'ida ·33401 (407) 655-1775 , FIRE STATION No. 3 PROJECT No. 93-61 BID TABULATION July 20, 1994 ......... L_> i··..· ........ . Q'CONNOR CONST. REL. i~lJIn? ~..> . .....>\ I>i > &>TAYLOR SPECIALTY < ..... .... -.-. </ ....... ~_/~< ..... ............\ 250,153 256,800 298,250 334,945 no bid ... ...... ...... Ala 16,022 15,440 8,634 13,317 0 Lockers i; 12/» 116 , 88 1 112 , 300 165 , 000 95 , 192 0 ......... '-·A. .........;.........< ......... ...... A3 7,670 5,870 3,493 12,694 0 Sanitary A3a 2,411 6,250 4,643 3,246 0 Trench drn. ><.. ...>.>. >.A4> > i 823 7 6 0 542 3 , 4 5 0 0 .....~" .<» I . ...."" ..,.> > i/ i···· »..... A$»> 5,291 4,620 5,100 5,520 0 ...... . ......- ..t... > < ~.:IiT\'> ... .» >..» ... .. ./ .\8 >... ...i 9 , 6 9 2 15 , 4 0 0 4 , 550 7 , 4 6 8 0 ..... > ....... .. .f,." i _>-- ..... .. JV.I..;::>L... ...< A7 2,214 1,670 3,694 1,575 0 Pier infill 1/ 8i\/ it> 3 , 4 7 9 3 , 8 7 0 6 , 3 0 3 6 , 4 1 0 0 > .>__. ~c» ..... i T>.. ....» .......... .<.... ·...·.i A9 18,681 8,940 20,328 15,176 0 Re-roof > ............. ........< ............ i !l.tn .....»> > 1 , 4 0 9 3 , 9 6 0 4 , 2 5 8 2 , 6 7 5 0 1\ .-.....< ........ ........ ..... Sid'rot.äl 387 , 72 8 39 7 , 7 10 4 84 , 003 4 55 , 6 6 0 0 A.1.jA2,þ'4,~5i A6,A8&Al0 .... . ... .. ...... ... .......> ...·.."V·,-> 7,670 5,870 3,493 12,694 0 ........ <.... ... ..........» ....... -"'7' .<.. 395 , 39 8 4 0 3 , 580 4 8 7 , 4 9 6 4 6 8 , 354 0 >I".Uü» esd\9361\bidtab , FIRE STATION No. 4 PROJECT No. 93-62 BID TABULATION July 20, 1994 < > .............. ...... ..>..... ....... .... > ~PM i ......... ........ < ·i.··\.·...·:..· C()NSTRUCTION .............. §:t~ > .......< ....» RSLAT11Jt)S1? ....... .... ...... B1 144, 172 154,800 143,500 188,019 113,683 Base bid B2 863 790 460 1,800 660 Door infill B3 208 1,100 560 1,200 375 Window Infill B4 3,421 2,930 5,102 600 1,600 Add'tl Parking B5 21,352 17,325 23,842 16,000 9,365 Reroof Existing B6 2,034 1,975 2,640 2,760 1,900 Repaint Building B7 793 4,950 7,103 2,265 5,600 Hurricane Shutters B8 20,115 13,650 3,340 47,469 41,185 Interior Partitions B8 a. 10,736 10,300 5,220 7,385 7,390 Dormitory Lockers , ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: Robert Rehr Fire Chief From: José AgUila\~l\ Asst. Construction Manager Date: September 26, 1994 Subject: Award of Bids, Fire Station #3 Project No. 93-61 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On June 5, 1994, the City advertised for bids on the renovation and addition work for Fire Station No. 3 and No. 4 . On July 20, 1994, bids were received by the City for both stations. Since that time, we have had several meetings to review the bids compared to the available funds in efforts to determine the best way to proceed with the work. As required by the Bid Documents, the bidders are to hold their bid prices for sixty (60 ) days after the opening of the bids. That date was September 18, 1994. David Miller, the consultant on this project, has had several conversations with the apparent low bidder, Young Development, and they have agreed to maintain their bid prices until October 20, 1994. However, if we are not able to award a contract by that date, they will not be able to guarantee their bid prices, or that of their suppliers, and the City '.viII have to proceed with are-bid. I have attached a copy of the bid tabulation for Station #3, indicating the work you and your staff have indicated must be done ;"-.¡:""- <?:t a minimum. Notice that Young Development's tabulated bid is $387,728.00, but they have "off the record" indicated that if we award, soon, or at least by the date indicated above, the will do all the selected work indicated in the attached bid tabulation for $372,000.00. The additional $7,670.00 shown is for the sanitary extension which will be funded from a separate Utility Fund. Please let me know, as soon as possible, how you wish for me to proceed, in order to avoid a costly re-bid process. cc: William Greenwood Ralph Hayden Mike Wigderson File 93-61 (D) esd\9361\how2go ~ , MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGERf1it1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # gp~ - MEETING OF OCTOBER 11. 1994 LEASE AGREEMENT WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY / MORIKAMI PARK WELLFIELD DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1994 This is before the Commission to consider approval of a 99-year lease agreement between the City and Palm Beach County relative to the siting and operation of the Morikami Park wellfield. In 1992 the Commission approved an interlocal agreement with the County wherein the County agreed to provide the City with a 99-year lease to operate and maintain up to 12 wells within the boundaries of Morikami Park. The City Attorney has reviewed the agreement and approves of same. Payment of $350,000.00, due upon the City's receipt of operating permits, is being withheld until action on the lease agreement is complete. Recommend approval of the lease agreement with Palm Beach County to operate and maintain the Morikami Park wellfield. ~u)/~~ ÚfU ~ /0 {p~. 6) 0-0 · Agenda Item No. S P tL AGENDA REQUEST Date: 10/5/94 Request to be placed on: XX Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: 10/11/94 Description of item (who, what, where, how much) : staff request Commission approval of a 99 year lease agreement between the City and Palm Beach County relative to the siting and operation of the Morikami Park Wellfield. ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: ytS/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YtS/NO Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of lease agreement. DEPARTMENT HEAD SIGNATURE: ø~/)n-~ I"!,/'~Þ,v Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) : City Attorney and outside counsel, Vance and Doney, have reviewed and recommend approval. Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds) : Funding available YES/NO Funding alternatives (if applicable) Account No. & Description Account Balance City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: @/NO 8M Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: Placed on Agenda: Action: Approved/Disapproved I MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden, City Manager FROM: William H. Greenwood, Environmental Services Director~~~ SUBJECT: LEASE AGREEMENT WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY-MORIKAMI PARK DATE: October 5, 1994 At the September 22, 1992, regular City Commission meeting, the Commission approved an interlocal agreement between the City and Palm Beach County relative to the Morikami Wellfield. One of the conditions of that agreement, was for the County to provide the City with a ninety-nine (99) year lease to operate and maintain up to twelve (12) wells within the boundaries of Morikami Park. The terms of the lease agreement are for ninety-nine years commencing on the date last executed by the parties. Rent for the initial term is $1.00 per year. Additionally, we have withheld payment of the $350,000, which was due upon our receiving permits to operate the wellfield, until action on the lease agreement is complete. By this memorandum, I am requesting that this item be placed on the City Commission agenda for October 11, 1994. WHG:cl Attachment r _....~. F,'(f: ¡t(þ II' k."t,·Io¡ll( Pk LAW OFFICES ¡)~/ ~ p,of t'~ f VANCE & DONEY, P.A. SUITE 200, BARRISTERS BUILDING 1615 FORUM PLACE WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 JAMES W. VANCE 199~ ocr - 3 ", '0: t::g Telephone ¡"oj t \oJ WILLIAM P. DONEY (.01) 6U-55" B. DOUGLAS MacGIBBON FacdaUe HALLIE G. HAWKINS (.01) 6U-00:U September 27, 1994 Mr. Ross Hering, Director Property & Real Estate Management Palm Beach County 3323 Belvedere Road, Building 503 West Palm Beach, Fl. 33406-1548 RE: Morikami Park Well Field Dear Ross: Pursuant to our conversation of September 26, 1994 please find enclosed a proposed revised Lease Agreement between Palm Beach County and the City of Delray Beach, Florida, which incorporates the provisions that you had requested. If you have any comments please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~ r-y~ . Vance, Esquire JWV/pm Encl. COPY: Bill Greenwood City of Delray Beach . t r '/, -/ . ¡ 1/:, ¡" _ , ! I' '. LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE entered into this day of , 19_ by and between the COUNTY OF PALM BEACH, a political subdivision of the state of Florida, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, and the CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, a Florida municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as CITY. The authority for this Agreement is Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, being a joint exercise of power pursuant to law in a contract or form of an Interlocal Agreement, as well as other applicable provisions of law. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, COUNTY owns and operates a large regional park (Morikami Park) lying to the west of CITY; and WHEREAS, CITY has determined, pursuant to engineering studies, that CITY should. acquire a western wellfield for eventual development to provide potable water for the areas served by CITY; and WHEREAS, the joint use of facilities by two (2) governmental entities typically provides benefits for both parties provided the proposed use is compatible; and WHEREAS, on or about November 24, 1992, COUNTY and CITY entered into an Interlocal Agreement whereby COUNTY agreed to provide CITY with a ninety-nine (99) year lease to operate and maintain up to twelve (12) wells within the boundaries of Morikami 1 Park along with easements for connecting well water mains and other appurtenances as more particularly described in said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants herein contained, the parties agree as follows: SECTION ONE DEMISE, DESCRIPTION, AND USE OF PREMISES A. COUNTY leases to CITY and CITY hires from COUNTY, for the purpose of the operation and maintenance of up to twelve (12) wells with easements for connecting well water mains and other appurtenances and further along with a blanket ingress/egress easement necessary for the operation and maintenance of the wellfield, those certain premises situated in the county of Palm Beach, state of Florida, and more particularly described on attached Exhibit "A". CITY, in the course of normal operation and maintenance of the wellfield, agrees to limit its access to the wellfield to suitable routes so designated by COUNTY in order not to unnecessarily disrupt operation of COUNTY's facility. SECTION TWO TERM The initial term of this lease shall be ninety-nine (99) years commencing on the date last executed by the parties hereto and ending ninety-nine (99) years therefrom. As used in this Lease Agreement, the expression "term of this Lease Agreement" refers to the initial term and to any renewal of this Lease Agreement as provided below. 2 . SECTION THREE RENT Rent for the initial term shall be One and 00/100 ($1.00) Dollar per year which CITY shall pay to COUNTY, without deduction or offset, with the first payment due upon the effective date hereof and subsequent payments to be made at each subsequent annual anniversary of the effective date. (Pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement dated November 24, 1992, the parties have heretofore agreed that City shall contribute the total sum of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 ($350,000.00) Dollars towards the ongoing development of Morikami Park). No other rent shall be due during the initial term of this Lease Agreement. SECTION FOUR WARRANTIES OF TITLE AND QUIET POSSESSION COUNTY covenants that COUNTY is seized of the demised premises in fee simple and has full right to make and entered into this Lease and that CITY shall have the non-exclusive quiet and peaceable possession of the demised premises during the term of this Lease Agreement. SECTION FIVE LOCATION OF WELLHEADS/MAINTENANCE CITY agrees that all wellheads constructed in Morikami Park will be specifically located as shown in attached Exhibit "A" and will be concealed by decorative structures subject to architectural approval by COUNTY. Upon mutual agreement of the parties, the wellsites or easements are subject to relocation at 3 . any time prior to construction of individual wells. CITY agrees to landscape all wellhead sites and to re-vegetate all easements subsequent to construction of wells and pipelines within the easement areas. CITY shall, at CITY's expense, throughout the term of this Lease Agreement, keep and maintain all structures and improvements placed on or under the leased premises in good, sanitary and neat order, condition and repair and CITY shall restore or rehabilitate any improvement that may be damaged by fire, casualty or any cause whatsoever. CITY shall further maintain the landscaping placed at each wellhead site. SECTION SIX SCENIC LAKES CITY agrees to maintain the water level of existing and proposed scenic lakes in Morikami Park at their existing design level by interconnection with the Lake Worth Drainage District Canal E-2 1/2 and/or pumping system as required; provided, however, - that COUNTY will interconnect additional scenic lakes at the time of their construction. In the event of a long term reduction in the water level of Lake Worth Drainage District Canal E-2 1/2 below 12.5 feet above sea level, the parties will mutually cooperate in a program to maintain aesthetic water levels of said decorative lake. COUNTY grants CITY reasonable access and locations to install, operate and maintain monitoring wells at such locations as are reasonably deemed necessary by CITY and any other governmental agencies having jurisdiction with respect to such matter in 4 , /'" relation to monitoring the groundwater levels and levels of said scenic lakes. Such monitoring stations are not to be placed in any location which would unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of the park facility. CITY agrees to accept the sites "as is", and further agrees to hold COUNTY harmless ~ith respect to any hazardous materials or any activity which could have produced hazardous materials or toxic effects upon human flora or fauna in connection with the extraction of wellwater from the site by CITY. SECTION SEVEN RELEASE CITY hereby releases COUNTY from any and all future liability, loss and damages CITY may suffer as a result of claims, demands, costs or judgments against CITY or COUNTY for any subsurface groundwater contamination resulting from the normal use of Morikami Park as a recreational facility. SECTION EIGHT SECTION CAPTIONS The captions appearing under the section number designations of this Lease Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Lease Agreement and do not in any way limit or amplify the terms and provisions of this Lease Agreement. SECTION NINE GOVERNING LAW It is agreed that this Lease Agreement shall be governed by, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the state of Florida. 5 . -- , ~ ", . ,'$. ~ / , SECTION TEN ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Lease Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties. Any prior understanding or representation of any kind preceding the date of this Lease Agreement shall not be binding upon either party except to the extent incorporated in this Agreement. This section shall not be interpreted in anyway to negate the terms and provisions of that Interlocal Agreement between COUNTY and CITY dated November 24, 1992 j LÙhiC!h /$ tn&J,epo~ h~/Ì? b-¡ 'RE-kEnc€... SECTION ELEVEN MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT Any modification of this Lease Agreement or any additional obligation assumed by either party in connection with this Lease Agreement shall be binding only if evidenced in a writing signed by each party or an authorized representative of each party. SECTION TWELVE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS The parties agree to execute whatever papers and documents may be necessary to effectuate the terms of this Lease Agreement. SECTION THIRTEEN EXECUTION This Lease Agreement shall be executed in two (2) copies, each of which shall be deemed an original and shall be effective 6 , ,. upon execution by both parties. The parties shall provide a copy of the Resolution or evidence of other actions authorizing the execution of this Agreement, which Resolution or other document shall be attached hereto as Exhibits and made a part hereof. SECTION FOURTEEN RECORDING The parties agree that CITY may, at CITY's expense, record this Lease Agreement in the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. MILTON T. BAUER, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY By: By: Deputy Clerk Chair Attest: Clerk Approved as to form and Date: legal sufficiency: County Attorney (seal) CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA City Clerk By: Attest: Mayor Alison MacGregor Harty Thomas E. Lynch Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Date: City Attorney Jeffrey S. Kurtz 7 . , MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: vi' CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~j?~ - MEETING OF OCTOBER 11. 1994 AWARD OF BID/DIPOMPEO CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1994 This is before the Commission to consider a bid award to DiPompeo Construction Corporation for the Veterans' Park Phase II project. The work will include additional landscaping, pavers, fountain installation, and trellis work, following the demolition of the lift station. Funding in the amount of $289,800.00 is available from the Decade of Excellence Phase II - Redevelopment of Veterans' Park Phase II (Account No. 228-4126-572-61.63). This amount does not include the pineapple plant which was to be the central feature of the fountain. It also does not include the gazebo portion of the park entrance off Atlantic Avenue. In my opinion, we can omit the gazebo feature and the overall park would not suffer. The pineapple plant is such a key feature of the fountain, however, that not having it will significantly diminish the fountain. The additional $10,900.00 needed for the pineapple feature is available to be transferred to this project from interest earnings (Decade of Excellance) . Therefore, I recommend that we award the base bid plus the stainless steel connector and the pineapple for a total award of $300 ,700.00. The alternatives are to construct the fountain wi thout the pineapple, or use one of the al ternati ve pineapple features included in the backup which might be less expensive. ~ (ùJ!~) ~ 3001700.00 5-0 " , Agenda Item No. AGENDA REQUEST Date: October 3, 1994 Request to be placed on: Regular Agenda Special Agenda __X__ Workshop Agenda When: October 11, 1994 Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Staff request City Commission award construction contract to DiPompeo Construction (lowest responsive & responsible bidder) , for the Veterans Park - Phase II proiect in the amount of $289,800.00. This includes the base bid for $284,900.00, plus add alternate #3 for stainless steel connectors at $4,900.00. Fundinq is available for this project in the Decade of Excellence Phase II, Redevelopment of Veterans Park - Phase II Account #228-4126-572- 61.63. ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: NOT REQUIRED Recommendation: Staff recommends award of contract to DiPompeo Construction for Veterans Park - Phase II construction in the amount of $289,800.00, which includes the base bid plus add alternate #3. ~ /f1 Department head signature: Æ 1,1 r¡!4tf Determination of Consistency wi th Comprehensive Plan: Ci ty Attorney Review/Recommendation (i f applicable) : Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): e Funding available: YE /NO Funding alternative ge6 A-'TTA~D (if applicable) Account No. & Description Account Balance City Manager Review: @NO !JÎ1 Approved for agenda: Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: Placed on Agenda: Action: Approved/Disapproved \esd\9457\agrq1011 . · ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: David T. Harden City Manager From: William Greenwood ,Y~~ Environmental Services Director Date: October 3, 1994 Subject: Agenda Request Veterans Park - Phase II Contract Award ................................. On September 8, 1994, the City received Four (4) bids on the referenced project. Following are the results of the submittals. 27,400 18,700 $ 12,885 11,300 15,000 $ 8,566 3,800 12,400 $ 1,500 $294,131 $341,064 The apparent low bidder, MHS Contractors, notified the City as required of his intent to withdraw his bid due to an error in his take-off. Therefore, DiPompeo Construction is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. The construction of this phase can begin immediately after the demolition of the old lift station and existing rest rooms on the project site area. It is anticipated that the construction will begin right after the Thanksgiving weekend, with completion in late February or early March. This is the second Phase of a Decade of Excellence project and funding is available in the Decade of Excellence, phase II Redevelopment of Veterans Park - Phase II Account #228-4126-572- 61.63. cc: Jose Aguila Joe Weldon File 94-57(A) , . ----.:... MEMORANDUM To: David T. Harden, From: Joseph M. Sa Date: September 26, Subject: Veteran r s Park Phase II Funding Recommendation Joe Weldon, Director of Parks and Recreation, sent you a memorandum dated September 22nd which stated that the current bid for Veteran's Park (Phase II) would be $289,800. If you concur, the funding for this could come from the following: · 228-4126-572-61.63 $36,235 Decade of Excellence Phase II (Veteran's Park) · 228-6111-581-99.01 $92,513 Decade of Excellence Phase II (Contingency) 7g /q3 · 228-0000-361-10.00 ~6f,2~J Decade of Excellence Phase II (Interest Earnings) . 228 ~111 581 ~1. 01 $2G,478 Decade af EHcollonoc Ph.:wc II (LiRo of Credit B.:ll.:11W 0 ) · 225-4126-572-61.63 $18,000 Decade of Excellence Phase I (Veteran' s park)7~7f't from the · Remainder of $4~, ~ to come from Water/Sewer Fund Master Lift Station Replacement account. This project should close out our Decade of Excellence Phase I Bond Construction Fund. If this funding meets with your approval, a Budget Transfer Form can be prepared and made part of the agenda approval of the bid for this project. " j PHASE 2 >I< PHASE 1",; I ' I' '~'" ' """'--,-". '., ,~~ ~':,,;';.~~ ',: r.·~"~;ti~' , I PRO~EI ~ I 0 IëOC\ ~ I/"'\ I / ~'71 r:,~ '1 \' LJ ~: ( _\ II.. (" 1 ~ V '. '- ..-1) 1\ U ) :(' : rL\ ~ :> --> SOD'~ I\:::/ ~ ~:>,. \L-41 > ~ ¿ ~~ I EXI6TING. COCONUT PALM6 (6) TO '~ "--/ ~ : . . . . .. FæMAIN . TO BE PROTECTED. -' 12' j 7 ~ --< ",,-- - " I ? -=> : .. . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . f""I I): ill ~ <: -, IOV\ 'l · 1) "-- ..J ~~ ž\ {' J \¿.f ~ ~ . .. .. . .. . ...... ... .. . ..... .... ....... .. .... ... w, -' 0 ~ >. ~ I /I ENTRA~CE " '<{' ~"'.LJ PLAZA , + :. ~~V . '" "J PROPOS D ' ~ 0 \ t(\ 1 rJA ~. BIKE RAC SOD,.. '1:1-1 \!dI >~~ 0 "-. 7J9.~ 0" .ZI ~v ~ '~rf':: ~ '<{ \ ~. ) , t: {~ ~:I ;: k(' .FOUNT A.IN~ 5 0 0 ;j '<{ ~ ~ ~ (/ ~ I / r--./)- _'" IHS\ ,.~::I 0 I ~ ~ 0 ~ fH\ L-4 ~~ ,,-\..U SOD ¡, '\1 ( G-\T'T'J'. \L-4J ~V1 "- k 'i.. I ~ .LJ \L - 41 '-", -..~, \ 'I ~ IA / '-..../ r- ~' 1 ~. r:::-.....F ~ ~ Ií t > ~ , ,,( r \ ~ <:::Jf} I~ / --.¡ ;, :: t)- ~:£ ~f/t ~ ..... --. , .~ 'i Î' <';:\!4'Ul' ij a ÀJ ~ : ,i ,~ t7 -0f'~ lfl v... V ; ! >-- ~"'\.. ""~ I, 'j .íLL\ ~^~~ 1f SOD / ¡ \ I 3 7l itl ~ I ;'. \ 'I \2.J · 'íG ~ Þ HIHS\ t .-q;J ~ ~ /Rii\ .. ! . ~ ~ ~ I \!d 4d':.¡p. f \J[lj ( '~.'i.:, /RË\ - ~ /,1 ill ® ~ ~ ¡)V ~ ...... ~ j \ 11 / IJ ~ ~(l '7 /RËl\ '1 \..:..:.../ ~~ ~f<-' 1 ...., \~I , ~ ~~ " ~'~I:æl ,,ø ICN\ c..,-. , D___ ------- --- c.. ~ bÀ /1 r.~., ______ ... .-( \....:-J , " I. =- - ------".4 ~ ______ \ Y ~~¡'.'î I @ ..---- ,J~L~ ' " , PI-M5E II " '[ FHA~~- I~ ---- -.0--___",.' @ /} ; ) FPL OvERI4EAD LINES -- ( 'ßl . (Ã\, ~ . " I A ''', '-. ~ . . '" .;1- 1 LEGEND PHASE 2 >I< PHASE ~ ., ':, I .> I ' I L . '~1 ~~~""'---""."'-""'~-~""'--'~~""""W'W_~"'!"".".''''''''_''__''_''''''''-'''_''''''~_''''''- - . . I , I ',I, ;" ,~,"', ~~;:( , Z o F= <t > ill .--J W Z « !z ::> o LL. a.. ~ ~. ~ '" I I . Ii I I / ~ I ' I ' ' . , ' I~ ' ¡ ,\ O~:ill // ' "If <) 0 U, II 1110 -,t ¡ .( 01 () , ,II 1Ù L\ "II ,,- 1fI'" "' .,4, ' I ~",C' ,w ,." 'I ~ ~I' 0 D,"" l>~ ." : III "1 r' 1..). ' \~~l!lI~t( /~~ I "p' , " , ... l' Ill. ~ ~ <~ ~,) ,'.,' 'c~ ;;; , / ~,' Q~~ i Ie ,'" '" ,,'" ~. j , "",,,z."'"'' ill , , 1" ,.U % ..." · I ~".j ,I' " ~""I ,," ~, , ê I!I:::. > '" W . nj~ t .,. ~ t \-,~ "f~'~F. ~ ß. ~ D I~ 'I . Z~ ~ ~ ¡ I ~ :-:Tj \-:1tl ;ØI~' ~ ~ ~~ ,,' .' ;ì. ~ ofl ~r~~~ . ' ~ I I ~ Ii --f , ~ '\ ~ III ~ > ~ ¡ , .,.' ~~~ i I è Urn ' - \) , : ""~ _. ' '" ~ 8 ,I ::¡: : ., '" ¡, ,,1 ¡I I' ì~ ~ ",! I- . ~: ~ ¡ 1-' I" .~~- . ~=III=-'i! \) 11- ·I""·~ . t"'''''j -I,i¡f , t' .--.."1 , ' I' it" ;t 1L.~ . ~ '~'-III v;. ......,~.',.'., II.' '0 ~ " -- " " " ., ,/¡y ,..21'- I m "I . \~"",~'p!w2~~~' == .-1 : <:!'1I1,~),,,(J:t..L~S~it\~ . I . 11·1·-· , () (yI{Y 'V ~ O' l\ J L.> \I, II! - I I u,t~~~J·,\O"':<t :1J, \ '-1 I ~ -, II.) "'VII.,.J()L\~ ,,¡¡¡,..,~ ".- II () ._ I (, 'I ty / -' 2."" -tt-- I lU" r;¡~~~~. :;\~.,~i~~~N!§~~ I ··-I·-I-~m' IJ - ~ '" Z « 0 II) <:! III ± Iìt ~ í? t-() ~- II 11 ü q). D 0\:7'4' SõI\L.IIl D' i - -r- I "I 'I (¡'I' 1--. ).IIIØI.I>I.w' ~ ) , -II I . x:'¡~()IY<J)(¡>oU\ _ 1- ..1L:..";"- . Z '",\3'I[B,,~~ß~ ({'~" -( ¡ 1--4--. ·.1···/ ! III ÌI~6 ¡-m'''' i N 9';) on, \--.:: II.¡":I·~.' ':\\: ' tJ' 0) nil .f ~ 1 "1.1) . IIlfY '--J LI ,; '.'..'.'..,'.....,~ Ul ()" ,I; lI'i" ,.' 'II ~ ~~t ir. ¡V'I 'I' '-,= - ~. ... , ntL .q:~ " ' ""',f' ,·i. - --' ~ 1/ ~ (Y/ " " ~- . - J Z I \-:-1¡~1 :.ft,,: In.,, - - i ti.:i'., :..\:"¡y , \I ¡ ~~ .=\ I \-1 \ . ill .,-\ <t~~ '9°' Inà --II I ':;~~ ' ,..' i%·..· -,'- -II' I- Ii <U'~ \- -- I ' .~--- - ; I ~ -llill I ; I I III ;, .'1' -111==1 I -·-1 '. ¡ . .....- =H I=H := f I /' q =1111 ~ N 11---111 J .. 0'" w ' .... - '\t-<t '0, JII - - w8·! ~..I!:: - ¡ 1ÏI';.\~)9 ;,,~ III Ç! I ---- \:; ~ ;<: c, ill'r " :~ ~ \-:- c. III ,,'00:1,"" . .,.. - - , 'f"",~" U'" ~ "i~" 11-1 M.1Ÿ1)1'1~)~t>. ~:llJ n,'? ~ ~ lU ?l ~ /'::; )1 ~;- ill 5 (, ,. l: ~ ~ \-:- \I '11;~ ' ill ,.)5' '::J ->J "I) -' J ,;, () / ".': /. 'I) .~' "'. nJ .A'': " ; r ofI ~li\ // I-I (Y ," /' / , \I) "" \J' ,I ---- .-f' 0 ~ (J " 1110 III Z'4 --- - I ~..'V'"' .4 . // /' _I' I' ----III . ' lJl / - i ~' -- > - ~ ': r-~'------~ O~;~ 0, '5 _I I-I (.ð)(~ 0 ~ ~ - -' - , \I n -\ ëJ. 0 - J ¡-III- 11I9n ~¡¡) . ì'= Iß - ~ i· 7- (I) ¡y III '''4 t_ <:t I - I ,).( "'111 \) - -, - - ;,11:,,: ~\~(?,'; l --I ¡ 1-' .X::;I Ive)!)'" -\ - ,.iY, I ' I L I- .': I 1:1 1-: ~=1 r- - ...../ I - .. .~ I I II b n - III / ~ wi D. ~ "" Ú I1J .I~U 22 N II. <II {: :K<\ ^, :1 ' .7 III ~ ,0; f):" ' " ,.,¡"p I Z 0 I- ~ W -.J W Z ~ Z => o. ' ~?~ 0..-; ç ~a ~----- 0 l) IJ III i~ I' 'IJ;¡;~ . '. -". .,~". '-.~. ~:;;~~ 1'- r ~ 1'l:,. " II) (y. II ~.I in~"I;¡ Ì) {) 11 ~ /. cl Ul lÙ¢ .J ... ~ê ç ¡::. ß Iii ,,1 ~. ~ ~:1 .J -5' ~ ~ ~ ~~ - I I \ ð , l- . « > w -I -- . w -- - z « '-- I- :== Z :== ê ~ . ~èÎ1 - - 0.. -- . ç .' -: ~ - n '- !i - -' -: i _ . 'I -- i " - - I' , Ii - ¡/ Ii - 0 : U ,I ~ I~I I' III tf)~~ ¡~~'õG"" --- - - B\d~ - - )~ ~ '1 l: II) rv. l¡' ~ I ~-_ mi /%. - ~ ~ tÙ~:_ \= ¡:::. ~D \Ù D.~ :z ~ ~ ~j - :Ž:' ~~ ~ ~ ~~ tK Ñ ..q~ .'" '",- , :z o ¡::: ~ ill -I . ill :z ~ " z c ð ,.u LL . " ? , ~ ~ . . , . ~ 0 l) 111 ~ Iv d) ~ l, G1õG~ ù 1 '.) I~ ¡'\'" '. I¡) IV. VI ·.~1 ia~"I;J f\ ~) II ;) cl \II. J -> \= ¡:: \~ J ~ '" ~ '" --, '\, . 270 FOUNTAINS ~",~!I I I . ~ ~ I I ì ~,-~_.._.- ~¥^-_..-----_.~..,-,._,.- í / , '~8~ 't\í;.. No. 4847 Sketch of fountain in Washington, D.C. The most interesting arrangement. The fountain is vicwed from the top and heing down below the walkway the wind docs not gct a chance to disturb thc fountain. It is placed in the ccnter of a turn-around for people coming to an apartment house and entering the garage. It is a most effective trcatmcnt. It is 22 fL in diamctcr. ,. ...... '~'{f / . " , \1~ ,p'# #; '-<'i< ~~ - .....~~.. ... \': No. 4733 Pineapple fountain using lead pineapple with bronze leaves with base 46 in. high. The pool is 6 ft. in diameter and uses a No. 275 curbing. © 1974. 270 Kenneth Lyncl Wilton, Conn. FOUNTAINS 253 I- II '1'1·\ , , · ,.1 f)f'~ ~oy No. 4757. Stone fountain arrangement using center fountain No.1 075 with pool curbing No. 275. Pool size is 16 ft. by 12 ft. 0, ¡ I ' " .,.( , ' I \ -~ \ ~'.~- , /', '-- < ... . .---::;;~/ ¿; '-.. ~.~ -~. .......___-.c-'-.. .,' .'~/;' "- ~ ~~ " ,. ... , ~ "'-. -'- ._-...... - - - -,~ '. .-._~ ------ ....'... _, ~---A. ..~...~,...~r.w .--.. ~.__-,_._:.-" /' ~ ~ -\, . -------_.'.'.,-..--- .. ."~' .' .--...--...-- ---- . .. ..A- No. 4736. Stone pool 5 ft. 6 in. in diameter with No. 964 figure and a No. 12 pump case. Directly in the water a pump can be installed and jets fastened to the side of the pump case to give this fountain much life. ©1974 Kenneth Lynch & Sons 253 Wilton, Conn. 06897 , . " . 186 FINIALS t f~ + _ "~"".<)o-).......... No. 692. Stone Pineapple finials. Heights are tI, \ \ \;'. ,. .....V~ 12"-16"-20"-25"- 30" 36" "';l ltJ1.'1\1'.'I.I.I..¡.~ ¡." " ,¿ , \ .¡ ¡ '.~ . ' ' j : '. \' Hf "> \ ,; No. 1127. Stone Pincapples, 24" high. No. 109. Cast stone, .' ~, . 25" high, 10~" dia. Base I . No. 2227 A. Lead Pmeapple is 7" x 7". .' '..... J~........................'.~:....'.'.. \. wi~~ ,;rought bronze leaves, ! \ ¡ {. .1/,.,', "\ I 22 h¡ghoverall. ¡; " ,,1., I \~,'ll'" I, f ' \ )" '. , ( \ . . of,~, ' "Ie' 1'.' \ .' . I' .."" i / '{,] \ ,,'P \ /. ( ") -f"'"t ' /1,,,,; '--, ;,' ''''' J 1 " .'" , . },, ~ .~ ,_'I ." ,1 '. ,...I! \ ]' ,.( " . ,,,.....'."í!J*».. '~~. . f - _ :, -..ii>" I'" - _ r '1 '.." ,". I' "'h ,;<,1 ' . . , " " ", ,I! I '" 1 \ " .' 'I ., 'f I , - -' ...:..'ej; _', _~ . "',':'\ \':."\ fJ . , . 1 .' J.. ,'",' I' .' "''-_~i ,,';;',',' J ,~, __,,-,,;,1- . - J ''''''~'.'~'''.' ."'.,-....~. ". , ., ,,. r· '--~ . -'., . . .. ' " '.- ..- .,.' p..' "-'1 4~ ' ," , ) I No. 224. Cast stone ._~ No, 2831. Pineapple furnished t .'--~ pineapple, 12" high. two ways; all s tone or lead Pine - ' Piped. No. 112. Cast stone apple with stone base. As shown .' pineapple, 16" high, on the left, it is 18" high and base ¡ 186 © 1974. 7~" dia, is 10" square. ' Kenneth Lynch & Sons Wilton, Conn. 06897 FINIALS 185 Itr·· [612. Lead pine- No. 694. Pineapp,le, ~, 12" high, 6" d1a cast stone, 13'2" :5"x5". high, 5t" dia, Piped. : No. 2962. Lead Pinecone by ; G. Lewis, 8" high x 8" diameter. ~ ~;~' ¡Can be made much higher by ~ ..' ~dding ~egments. ~pe~ial draw- . ... . mgs avallable on thls Pme Cone, developed to any size you desire. No. 80. Cast stone, 36" tall. No. 84. Stone Pineapple, 22 1/2" high, 11"_ square base. ,C) 1974 No. 358. Cast stone, 33t" 185 Kenneth Lynch & Sons high, base 11t" x 112". Wilton, Conn. 06897 , . ;.' FINIALS Note: All lìnials are rein, forced intcrnally. All lìnials can bc equippcd with a coupling nush with the bottom. Be sure to request this. All finials can be furnishcd wit h an in- stallalion anchor at no ex, tra chargc. Many cus, tamers are merely in, stalling with a dab of epoxy ecment as opposed 10 using iron anchors and gencrally this is very satis, factory. Just make certain :fl,_ the surface is clean. I f you 1:::. arc goi ng to ask for iron ~ anchors make sure the ,.' hole for them is drilled in the correct location. Gen- erally the anchors are 3/4" in diameter and you should have an 1'l2" hole. ~ Stone fÌnials are very rug, ; ged indeed in spite of their graceful addilion to an en- ., .,-.__1 trance way. ~..---- No. 6093. Cast stone. 28" high base 12" NQ. Cast stone. 34" high, base 12" ','" ~.e? 0"" · \-i. r· · square. fO"" · , . ....- ,- No. 6091. Cast stolle. 19" high base R" dia. 184 Check 6!i:!" dia. No. 6090. Cast slone, 131/.," high. hase W' No. 600R. Cast stone. 17" high.1Jase 8" db. dia, Check 6W' Jia. © 1974, I Check 6Yz" dia. Kenneth Lynch & Sons I Wilton, Conn, 06897 J ¡ I . -. MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER tlJ1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # S R + - MEETING OF OCTOBER 11. 1994 AWARD OF BID/CHOICE RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1994 This is before the Commission to consider a bid award to Choice Restaurant Equipment and Supply, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, for the kitchen equipment at the Golf Course Clubhouse. The base bid with all new equipment was $238,537.00, and the option bid for used equipment was $164,673.00. By selecting the used equipment option, the clubhouse will have a quality kitchen, with considerable savings for the City. The golf course staff is reviewing the equipment list and deleting items of less need in order to stay within the established budget of $150,000.00. Funding is available from the Golf Course Clubhouse - Furniture and Fixtures (Account No. 445-4763-572-64.10). Recommend award of the bid for kitchen equipment to Choice Restaurant Equipment and Supply in an amount not to exceed $150,000.00. ~5-0 I Agenda Item No. AGENDA REQUEST Date: October 5, 1994 Request to be placed on: Regular Agenda Special Agenda X Workshop Agenda When: October 11, 1994 Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Staff request the City Commission award a contract to Choice Restaurant Equipment and Supply for the kitchen equipment at the Golf Course Clubhouse in the amount of not to exceed $150,000.00. Specific equipment is beinq reviewed for final selection and will be finalized shortly, but within the established budqet. Funding is available in the Golf Course Clubhouse Construction Fund Account #445-4763-572- pro 10 . IP,/ ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: NOT REQUIRED Recommendation: Staff recommends City Commission award contract to Choice Restaurant Equipment and Supply for the Golf Course Clubhouse Project, kitchen equipment in the amount of not to exceed the established bud et amount of $ 50 000.00. Department head signature: Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: Ci ty Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) : Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): i2 Funding available: YE /NO Funding alternativ ~ (j.f a~ll~) Account No. & Desc~V~ìl,3'--&?2- .~;ro é::¡ .C, UJ. - F5t.-þ6t5 Account Balance!: ' City Manager Review: @ ~Á Approved for agenda: . E /NO vf~1 Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: Placed on Agenda: Action: Approved/Disapproved \esd\9318\agrql011 I ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: David T. Harden City Manager 1l From: William H. Greenwood ~ Director of Environmental ervices Date: October 5, 1994 Subject: Agenda Request (revised) Golf Course Clubhouse - Kitchen Equipment Award of Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Due to the special nature of the kitchen equipment requirements for this project, the City did not include the kitchen equipment in the general contractors bid package. What we did instead, was to require the contractor to make all connections and installations based on the kitchen design, and the City would bid separately the kitchen equipment. On September 29, 1994, the City received five (5) bids for the kitchen equipment, and the lowest responsive and responsible bidder was Choice Restaurant Equipment & Supply of West Palm Beach, Florida. The bid package included an option for used equipment, which is, for all practical purposes, as good as new, and all manufacturer warranties apply. Base bid (all new equipment including deduct alternate # 1 and deleting sales tax), was for $238,537.00 and the option bid (used equipment including deduct alternate #1 and deleting sales tax), was for $164,673.00. The bids have been reviewed by Digby Bridges, Marsh and Associates as well as by Brahm Dubin and his staff (see attached memo), and are acceptable for this project. By selecting the used equipment option, the clubhouse will still have a quality kitchen, while the City enjoys the savings. At this point, the Golf Course staff is further reviewing the equipment list, and deleting those items of less need, in order to keep below the established budget of $150,000.00. On thursday October 6, 1994, Brahm Dubin and Digby Bridges will visit the warehouse to finalize the equipment selection in order to prepare the shop drawing package for submission to the general contractor for installation. This needs to be done very soon, as it impacts the location of underground plumbing and electrical services. Staff recommends the City Commission award the contract to Choice Restaurant Equipment & Supply for the kitchen equipment for the Golf Course Clubhouse Project, in the amount of not to exceed the budget amount of $150,000.00. Funding is available in the Golf Course Clubhouse Construction Fund, Account #445-4763-572-~.10. cc: José Aguila (pc¡. File 93-18 (D) . , PHONE NO. : 407 243 7386 P02 FROM : DELRRY BCH GOLF COURSE DONALD ROSS . 1923 TO: Jose Aguila FROM: Brahm Dubin DATE: October 5, 1994 RE: Kitchen Equipment Proposal for the New Clubhouse This is to advise you that Miehael Staie and myself have rev1ewed the alternate proposal from Choice Restaurant Equipment and feel certain that we will be able to purchase all necessary kitchen equipment at a cost below $150,000.00. Michael sta1e, Digby ~rid9.s and myself ~re going to Choic~·ø warehouse on Thursday, October 6, 1994 to initiate the purchasing process. Therefore we arê recommending the City of Delray Beach accept the alt&rnate proposal of Choioe Restaurant Equipment. BD/cmd KITEQUPR..WPT ~~ U:_\"'__.A A....__.._ _ "'_1__... ft....-........ P"'.__!....._...."'.A'... - J ._-" .- "'.- ---- , . . . . I TABJlATIctI OF BIDS BID .-34-82 A.RUSH OF fOCI) seRVICE AND ~ EQJIPt'lEHT Fæ DElRAV BEACH GOLF aJ..RSE ClI.ØtOJSE SEPTEJoÐER 29. 1994 Arrow Edward Don Choice Atlantic Coast ILiberty ~ Industries & Company Restaurant Restaurant International Corp. Equipment Inc. Equipment & Inc. Supplies TOTAL BASE BID $240,589.00 $244,000.00. $253,591.56 * $269,000.00 $295,000.00 ALTERNATE U. DELETE ~ -0- - $848.00 -$1,034.00 - $2,310.00 -$1,126.00 F~ DRAIN TRO..Gf C011EHTS/EXCEPTIctIS Note: At this *Bidder Price list time we bid included sales w/substitutes according to tax in total. submitted , plans & Submitted a specifications price list. Bid Scope: Alternate Bid Item #145 - $175,295.72 . Written spec. (includes salee I tax) . calls for qty . of 2, plan Submitted a shows 3 -price price list. is based on qty. of 3. Page 11400-23 Install drain lines to var- iable floor , sinks, etc. Spec conflicts w/bid proposal stating final hook-up by others, we bid according to bid proposal. - I I . . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ~TY MANAGER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # Sfs - MEETING OF OCTOBER 11. 1994 BID AWARD/TENNIS CENTER PHASE III DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1994 This is before the Commission to consider award of a contract to Altman-Barry Construction, Inc. , in the amount of $1,365,000.00 for the construction of the Tennis Center Phase III project. The project generally consists of the addition of approximately 5200 new permanent seats to the center stadium and additional permanent toilet facilities. This will make temporary bleachers and toilets no longer necessary at special events. The construc- tion period is three months. However, both the architect and the general contractor have agreed that the project will be complete by the first week of March, 1995, for the Virginia Slims Tournament. Funding in the amount of $1,533,248.00 is available, which includes a $70,000.00 allocation from the Utility Tax Bond. Total project costs are $1,517,409.00, which leaves only $15,839.00 for contingency, or approximately one percent (1% ) of the construction bid. As a rule of thumb, at this point in the bid process we would feel more comfortable with a contingency of approximately three percent (3 %) of the project costs. The architect and staff have reviewed the project scope to deter- mine if any project elements could be eliminated to reduce the cost. They do not recommend any changes in the scope of the project. Direct City purchase items could be eliminated, but we feel that these are needed to enhance the facility for other than tennis use. An option for Commission consideration is to increase the amount of funding provided from the Utility Tax Bond from $70,000.00 to $100,000.00. This would increase the contingency amount to $45,839.00 or approximately 3.4 percent of the construction amount. Recommend consideration of contract award to Altman-Barry Construction, Inc. in the amount of $1,365,000.00 with funding from the General Construction Fund - Tennis Center Phase III - Bleachers (Account No. 334-4145-572-63.43) , and $100,000.00 allocation from 1994 Utility Tax Bond. ~.w/~~~ 5~O Úlildý rY¥ ßCJ'rGCf Þ ~~~ . I ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: David T. Harden ¿J City Manager @(~ From: ~William H. Greenwood Director of Environmental Services Date: October 10, 1994 Subject: Aqenda Request (REVISED) Delray Beach Tennis Center - Phase III Project No. 94-71 ................................. Staff request City Commission award a general construction contract for construction of the Tennis Center - Phase III project to Altman-Barry Construction, Inc., for a total construction cost of $1,365,000.00 with a construction completion date of February 15, 1995. The City went through a contractor pre-qualification process, in which six (6) contractors submitted documents for review. Following staff review, all six contractors were deemed to meet the criteria established by the City. On Thursday October 6, 1994, two (2) bids were received by the City. Following is a tabulation of the two (2) bids received and a overall budget overview. Bid $1,365,000 $1,588,418 $1,270,000 $1,533,248 (*) Exclusive of professional fees. The funding for this project comes from a variety of sources, primarily from the Palm Beach County Tourist Development Tax Fund (TDF) . Below is a breakdown of all available monies for this project. Approved TDF Funds $1,085,000.00 Pending TDF Funds to be $ 315,000.00 approved 10/18/1994 Utility Tax Bond 1994 $ 70,000.00 Phase II, Tennis Center $ 63,248.00 Carry Over , , Bond & Other $ 12,009.00 Finance Cost Low Bid $1,365,000.00 Altman-Barry Professional $ 99,600.00 Fees DBMA Other City $ 37,000.00 Purchase Items (see below) Other Fees $ 3,800.00 Soil Test, etc Notice that there is a listing above of other items related to the project totalling $37,000.00, which must be purchased by the City, and not in the general contractors price. These are City requested items necessary for the proper use of the center, but not associated with the Virginia Slims. Those items are as follows. 1. Stage Roof Cover $10,500.00 2. Court Cover $10,000.00 3. Additional Signage $ 6,500.00 4. Ramp & Handicap Carpeting $ 6,125.00 5. Sound System Alterations $ 2,000.00 6 . Stage Floor Covering $ 1,875.00 Total $37,000.00 The project generally consists of the addition of approximately 5200 new permanent seats to the center stadium, as well as additional permanent toilet facilities which will make temporary bleachers or toilets no longer necessary for special events. The construction period is short, three months, however both the architect and the general contractor have agreed that the project will be complete by the Virginia Slims Tournament during the first week of March. Staff has made appropriate follow up on references and other past history regarding this general contractor, and has found no items of concern. They have over 24 years experience in a variety of work, and generally the references have been positive. . The above request, if accepted by the City Commission, represent a total construction cost of $1,365,000.00. Funding will be available for this project in the General Construction Fund, Tennis Center Phase III - Bleachers Account # 334-4145-572-63.43. cc: José Aguila File 94-71 (A) \ESD\9471\agmm1011 Agenda Item No. AGENDA REQUEST (REVISED) Date: October 10, 1994 Request to be placed on: Regular Agenda Special Agenda __X__ Workshop Agenda When: October 11, 1994 Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Staff request City Commission consider award a general construction contract to Altman-Barry Construction, I nc . , in the amount of $1,365,000.00, for the construction of the Tennis Center - Phase III project, Bleachers Addition. Funding will be available in the General Construction Fund, Tennis Center Phase III - Bleacher Account #334- 4145-572-63.43. ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: Not Required Recommendation: Staff recommends award of construction contract to Altman-Barry Construction, Inc. , in the amount of $1,365,000.00, for construction of the Ten Ce r Phas III Pro·ect. Department head signature: Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) : Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): ~ Funding available: YES NO Funding alternativ Account No. & Descrip io Account Balance City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: YES/NO Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: Placed on Agenda: Action: Approved/Disapproved \esd\9471\agrq1011 , . . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ~ITY MANAGER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # SPð - MEETING OF OCTOBER 11. 1994 BID AWARD/TENNIS CENTER PHASE III DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1994 Bids and total project costs were still being reviewed at the time the agenda was distributed. We expect to provide supporting materials on Monday, October 10, 1994. ., I P.Ø2 TUE Ø3:Ø8 PM STREETBAll PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INC. October 7, 1994 Mrs. Marjorie Ferrer Delray Beach Joint Venture 64 S.B. Fifth Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33483 Dear Majorie, I want to thank you, your staff, and aU the members representing the City of Delray Beach for your interest and kind reception. When Hoop-It-Up truly becomes a community event, embraced by all segments of the city, everyone wins. It certainly appears that this will be the case with the 1995 Delray Hoop-It-Up. I do not have all the various individuals names, titles and addresses. Please forward a copy of this to all appropriate parties to review the short segment that would pertain to them and give them my thanks for their help and participation. As we discussed, there are some areas that need to be addressed by the various departments within the city. They would be as follows: DATE . Planned for October 14-15, 1995 4006 Belt Line Rood, Suite 230 ~ Dallas, Texas 75244-2329 .'ft, Phone 21 4.991. 1110 J ~ fox 2¡4,99U 135 . I P.03 OCT-11-94 TUE 03:09 PM SITE · As per your map, the site would consist of the area on West Atlantic Ave. and Atlantic Ave. ITom SW 7th Ave. to approximately 2nd Ave. Included in this area would be SW 3rd Ave. and SW 2nd Ave. for about 2 blocks South of West Atlantic. The tennis center, center court area and front parking lot (only) would be an area used for much of the central aspects of the event. We would like a staging area near the tennis center for Thursday and would like access to the street by no later than 12 :00 noon on the Friday before the event. Thus keeping this area closed from noon Friday, October 13, 1995 to approximately 8:30pm October 15th,1995. What our city partners would help provide · Assist the event in acquiring all the necessary pennits for the outdoor basketball festival. · On Friday, October 13th, in the afternoon. The Delray Beach Fire Department would assist the event by using one of it's tanker units to fill approximately 60 55-gallon barrels. It should take about 2 hours and 3 fireman. It is preferable that it not be potable water to protect Florida water management resources. · The Department of StreetslRoadways would assist the event by blocking off the above mentioned area with barricades. This area would be taken down Sunday PM. This department would control and lead the way of re-directing traffic and recommending parking areas. . I P.04 OCT-11-94 TUE 03:10 PM . . . · The Police Department would assist the event by providing 4-6 officers to patrol the event during "play" hours. They would also recommend a night time security company or off duty officers for SPI to contract with to insure the security of the area and equipment. · The Parks and Recreation Department would assist the event by helping distribute event infonnation throughout it's facilities, staff, and leagues. They would also provide approximately 9~ 1 0 basketball knowledgeable individuals and 6-8 referee's for the event weekend. These individuals would work with SPI staff to provide management of the games. Parks and Rec management would help identify underprivileged teams to be assisted by the corporate youth program. · The Department of Sanitation would provide extra trash receptacles and 2-3 individuals to assist in collection during the event days. SPI would rent a 30 or 40 yard dumpster to be emptied each day by the service provider. Delray Beach Joint Venture · Would assist the event by helping insure good communication between our staff and our city partners. · Would assist the recruitment of a Hotel partner for the event. The event would need approximately 50 room nights, most of which would be used the event week and weekend. This would be in trade for a sponsorship where the Hotel would be the official Hotel of the event. · Assist SPI staff and Carquest Bowl Staff in identifying media partners. . I P.05 OCT-11-94 TUE 03:11 PM . · Assist SPI staff and Carquest Bowl Staff in identifying any key sponsors. · The joint venture would be able to supply a small desk and phone to be used by staff or interns for the event. The Chamber office would be identified as the local"last minute" drop off for entry fOlIDS. (most forms come throughout the U.S. Mail to the regional office) · Help identify corporate youth program sponsors. · Help identify a key individual or two to control volwlteer recruitment and implementation of the volunteer plan. Charitable Organizations As with all of our events, this event will help support local charities through an exchange of volunteers for dollars to suppol1 their individual needs. Delray Beach City Management will identify the charitable organizations to receive benefit from this event. SPI will provide $15.00 per paid team and other material opportunities in exchange for an appropriate number of volunteers to assist with the event. SPI will also create a special event for these charities to run either individually or together(TBD by SPI). Each special event will charge $1.00 per participant and all funds will go to the orgatùzation running their event. In addition to this SPI will make available certain concession rights which can be staffed by those organizations, proceeds, profits and cost of goods to be the responsibility of the charity. It is noted and , P.ø6 OCT-11-94 TUE 1213:12 PM . agreed by all that certain restrictions will apply to what is to be sold as per SPI National contracts. A scenario as follows should occur (dependent on the number of organizations included): · 400 paid teams = $6,000.00 to be divided by 12 groups, $500.00 per group · A special event collecting $1000.00 over the event weekend, split between two groups. ( 6 events in all), $500.00 per group · Concession booths set-up for the event generating a $6000.00 profit or $500.00 per group. Manpower: per group (Based on 12 groups) · 10 court monitors · 5 water & ice · 2 scoreboard · 8 for other events,helping with volunteer headquarters,runners etc. Hours: 9:00 am to about 5:30 pm each day (two days). Concessions will provide volunteer meals and SPI will provide the T-shirts. PLUS · 3 for their special event · 5 for concession area , P.07 OCT-11-94 TUE 03:13 PM . , . . . , . The only other needs are 10 people(total) for registration preparation ( about 3 hours Wednesday prior to the event) and 12 people (total) for registration on Friday from 12:00 noon to 8:00pm. SPI will be responsible for all other costs and providing all materials to put on such an event. SPI will also include all local parties as a rider to our special event insurance policy. If the above is agreed to by all parties please sign below. J¡~ Streetball Partners ,Inc. DelRay Joint Venture City of Delray Beach '. I - . oK ~1 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTATION CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING OF: OCTOBER 11, 1994 ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION The item before the City Commission is a discussion regarding the annexation reserve area west of Military Trail. This discussion was initiated during the consideration of the voluntary annexation of a portion of the Rockland Park subdivision, when concerns were expressed regarding the seemingly "piecemeal" approach to annexation. The purpose of this report is to provide some background on the development of annexation policies for this area, and to describe the strategies that are available to accomplish the eventual annexation of the various properties. It is hoped that the discussion which ensues will provide direction as to the treatment of the Rockland Park annexation petition, and on the course of action that should be pursued for the area as a whole. BACKGROUND The following is a history of policies and events that established the annexation area and led to its current configuration. The Reserve Annexation Area The Charter for the City of Delray Beach established the "Greater Delray Beach Area" . That area exceeded the actual municipal boundaries by establishing a reserve annexation area, within which properties could be incorporated into the City. The "reserve" area was also recognized in the preparation of 208 Water Quality Plans and 201 Water and Sewer Facilities planning. Accordingly, the County Utility District was not to provide services east of the reserve area's western boundary, the E-3 Canal. However, during the early 1980s when the City of Delray Beach was under a development moratorium due to insufficient water treatment capacity, the County Utility district was allowed to extend east of the canal and serve select, new developments e.g. Las Verdes, Country Lake and Boca/Delray Golf Club. Later Bel Aire and Monterey Lake were accommodated by utility service from the County upon agreement by the City. Thus, the City's western boundary is, and will remain, quite irregular. WS.c2 . , City Commission Documentation Annexation Reserve Area West of Military Trail Page 2 Designation of the Planninq Area With the adoption of the City of Delray Beach's Comprehensive Plan in November, 1989, the concept of the "reserve annexation area" was replaced with the City's designated planning and service area, or "planning area." The "planning area" extends west to the E-3 Canal, south to the C-15 and L-38 Canals, north to Gulfstream Boulevard and the L-30 Canal, and east to the Atlantic Ocean. The area includes the existing incorporated area, the enclaves within that area, and the future annexation area to the west of the City limits. Use of Water Service Aqreements When vacant properties located within the reserve annexation area are developed, they are to be served by the City's water and sewer systems. If the property is contiguous to the City annexation is required in order to receive water service. If the property is not contiguous, service is provided through a water service agreement. The standard water service agreement contains a paragraph which requires development proposals to comply with the City's LDRs, and a paragraph acknowledging that the execution of the agreement constitutes an agreement to voluntary annex into the City whenever the property becomes contiguous. In the early 1990's the City's Planning Department "called in" the water service agreements containing the annexation clauses. This resulted in a western expansion of the City's boundaries, to include commercial property west of Military Trail (i.e. the southwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Military Trail). In August of the previous year (1989) the City had made its first expansion west of Military Trail with the voluntarily annexation of Walmart. Unfortunately, the standard water service agreement was not utilized in all cases. Some existing agreements for properties located west of Military Trail, such as the agreements with High Point West and Marketplace of Delray, do not contain the annexation or LDR compliance clauses. Others require reimbursements from future connections (Delray Community Hospital). Figure 1 illustrates the unincorporated properties west of Military that are currently receiving municipal water service. Figure 2 illustrates the types of agreement under which that service is being provided. POSSIBLE METHODS OF ANNEXATION Florida Statutes provided limited measures for the annexation of property. Essentially, annexations can occur through referendum, through voluntary petition, or through joint agreement between the City and County (for enclaves 10 acres or , I city Commission Documentation Annexation Reserve Area West of Military Trail Page 3 less in size). The mechanism used will depend to a large extent on whether or not the property is vacant or developed, and whether or not it has adequate facilities. The City has at is disposal additional tools to facilitate annexations, such as water service agreements and the County's annexation program, however, those tools are limited in their applicability. The following is a discussion of the means by which the properties west of Military Trail would most likely be annexed. Voluntary Annexation Voluntary annexation is by far the preferred approach. The property owner receives the best services that are available, and the City furthers its goal of having all of the property in the Planning Area within its jurisdiction, and therefore, under its control. Voluntary annexations are most likely to be utilized to incorporate vacant properties that are proposed for development, and are seeking water service from the City. I f contiguous, annexation will occur immediately. If not contiguous, the signing of a water service agreement will provide for future annexation. Figure 3 illustrates the locations of vacant parcels west of Military Trail which are candidates for voluntary annexation. The properties are further described in Appendix "A." Annexation Incentive Program In implementing directives within its Comprehensive Plan, the County in January, 1993 adopted an annexation incentive program. The incentive program provides for joint City, County, and landowner participation in the construction of water, sewer, drainage, street, and related facilities in selected areas as an incentive for annexation into an adjacent municipality. The program allows for the use of the existing MSTU (County's Municipal Service Taxing Unit Program) ordinance to fund infrastructure improvements by a maximum one-third cost sharing agreement between the County, municipality and landowner. Once infrastructure improvements are made, the development is voluntarily annexed into a municipality. This program has not yet been utilized for the annexation of property into Delray Beach. The incentive program is the annexation strategy which is most appropriate for communities that are already developed but lack adequate infrastructure. The Country Club Acres subdivision would be a candidate for this program as it lacks water and sewer facilities, proper drainage, street lights and sidewalks. The program is essentially a referendum, with the provision of improved services as an incentive to gain support for the annexation. It requires the following steps: , , city Commission Documentation Annexation Reserve Area West of Military Trail Page 4 1. Establishment of a work program; 2. Development of cost estimates; 3. Conducting of public hearings with residents; 4. Development of an interlocal agreement between the County and the participating municipality; and, 5. Conducting an annexation referendum involving residents of the affected area. Upon a majority vote of the residents, improvements would be installed and the annexation consummated. Annexation bv Referendum For commercial properties and existing developments that already have adequate infrastructure, annexation by referendum is probably the only annexation strategy available. High Point West, which is currently served by water, sewer, drainage, paved streets, etc. would be a candidate for referendum. Essentially, residents would have to agree that the benefits of annexation (improved Emergency/Fire, Police, and other services) would outweigh the increase in ad valorem taxes and other fees. A preliminary Urban Services Report has been completed for High Point West which indicates that residents having a homestead exemption would experience an increase of approximately $27.00 in taxes and assessments. The increase to residents without homestead exemption (30% of the units) would be approximately $150.00. Without considering the costs of providing services to the new residents, the increase in revenue to the City would exceed $460,000. Additional detail on the applicable costs and revenues is provided in Appendix "B." A referendum for High Point West would have to include the Rockland Park subdivision and several properties to the north as exclusion of those areas would create enclaves (prohibited by Florida Statutes). It is further recommended that the referendum include the commercial properties south of High Point West, and the residential area which lies south of Atlantic Avenue (excluding Country Club Acres). It is noted that only registered voters who live in the area to be annexed are eligible to vote for, or against, a referendum. Owners of commercial properties would not be able to vote. The above area constitutes approximately 396.7 acres, which is equivalent to approximately 4.12% of the City's total land area. The total population of 2,038, is less than 5% of that of the City. As both factors are less than 5%, the referendum need only include the residents of the affected area, and not the entire City. The Referendum procedures pursuant to Florida Statute 171.043 are as follows: * An ordinance proposing to annex an area of contiguous, compact, unincorporated territory shall be adopted by the City Commission. " , City Commission Documentation Annexation Reserve Area West of Military Trail Page 5 * Prior to the ordinance becoming effective a referendum on annexation shall be submitted to a vote of the registered voters of the area proposed for annexation. This referendum can be held at the next regularly scheduled election following the final adoption of the ordinance or at a special election called for the purpose of holding the referendum. However, the referendum, whether held at a regular scheduled election or at a special election, shall not be held sooner than 30 days following the final adoption of the annexation ordinance. * The ordinance shall become effective 10 days after passage by a majority vote of the referendum or as otherwise provided in the ordinance, but no more than 1 year following the date of the referendum. If a majority vote against annexation is received, the ordinance shall not become effective, and the area proposed to be annexed shall not be subject to an annexation ordinance for a period of 2 years from the date of the referendum. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES REGARDING ANNEXATIONS When the City's Comprehensive Plan was prepared, Future Land Use Map designations were applied to properties within the entire Planning Area, whether incorporated or not. These land use designations were utilized to estimate ultimate population and the impact on future needs and level of services. The population projections and population distributions were considered in the sizing of water and sewer facilities and in establishing the demand for parks and traffic facilities. Data for the service and planning area was considered in preparation of the Housing Element, Land Use Element, Public Facilities Element (water, sewer, solid waste) and Open Space and Recreation Element. The Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1989, provides objectives and policies relative to the annexation of unincorporated properties located within the Planning Area. Objective B-3 calls for the properties to be annexed "in a quick and orderly manner." The strategy which is outlined to achieve this objective includes the preparation of Urban Service Reports for the areas, working with Palm Beach County pursuant to the Annexation Incentive Program, proceeding with annexations in accordance with Florida Statutes, and accommodating individual voluntary annexations as the opportunities arise. '. City Commission Documentation Annexation Reserve Area West of Military Trail Page 6 SUMMARY As noted above, the Comprehensive Plan calls for the annexation of all areas within the Planning Area, including those so designated west of Military Trail. It will take a variety of approaches to achieve this objective. A voluntary petition has been submitted for the annexation of a portion of the Rockland Park Subdivision. It is anticipated that another petition will be forthcoming from the owner of the Spence property, located just north of the Marketplace of Delray (K-Mart shopping center) . These properties will be requesting annexation in order to receive water service. Policy B-3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that the City will provide those services upon demand, in a manner consistent with its policies. Currently those policies state that if the property is contiguous to the City, it is to be annexed. Concerns have been raised over the annexation of individual parcels such as the Rockland Park subdivision in that it will lead to confusion over service provision between the City and County, and will further fragment the western border. While not an ideal circumstance, this condition is one which has been dealt with in other areas of the City for many years. It should be viewed as a temporary situation pending the annexation of adjacent properties. In the interim, the City maintains control over the development and appearance of the property, and receives the ad valorem and per capita revenues. Table 1 provides a summary of assessed values and potential ad valorem revenues for selected properties west of Military Trail. These parcels are illustrated on Figure 4. It should be noted that the revenues do not include utility taxes, franchise fees, per capita reimbursements, occupational license fees, or stormwater assessments. Additional study is needed to determine those revenues, as well as the costs to the City of providing services. ., , APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF VACANT/UNDERDEVELOPED PARCELS Rockland Park: Twelve acres of the Rockland Park single family subdivision is currently vacant. This vacant property has a County FLUM of LR-3 (Low Density Residential - 3 units per acre) , a County zoning designation of AR (Agricultural), and a city FLUM of MD (Medium Density Residential - 5-12 units per acre). A multi-family residential development under the City MD (FLUM) and RM zoning designations has been requested. The Planning and Zoning Board has recommended a City advisory FLUM designation of MD (Medium Density Residential) and a zoning of RL (Reside~tial Low Density). Consistency would be maintained between the City FLUM and zoning maps with a development proposal containing between 5 and 6 units per acre. City Commission has forwarded a FLUM amendment to MD to the State and will consider annexation and initial zoning in November. Parcel North of Rockland Park: This 5 acre parcel is currently vacant and located behind the Southern Self Storage facility east of High Point West. The parcel has a County FLUM of HR-8 (High Residential - 8 units per acre), County zoning of AR and City advisory FLUM of MD. No development inquires have been made on this parcel. Northwest Corner Kmart Plaza: This approximately 5 acre parcel currently contains a single family home and is located northwest of the Kmart Plaza (northwest corner of Military Trail and Atlantic Avenue) . The parcel has a County FLUM of HR-8, County zoning designation of AR and a City advisory FLUM of MD. No development proposals or inquires have been received on this parcel. Spence Parcel: This 14.23 acre parcel immediately north of Kmart is in the process of a County FLUM change to 12.23 acres HR-8 and 2 acres Commercial. This parcel has a County zoning of Special Commercial and a City advisory FLUM of Transitional. The owners designee has had preliminary discussions involving mUlti-family development on 12.23 acres and neighborhood commercial development on 2 acres. APPENDIX A . , This parcel was originally considered for annexation in January, 1991 with an initial zoning of RM (Residential Medium) . At the public hearing the owner requested annexation with a GC (General Commercial) zoning designation. As the commercial zoning was inconsistent with the Transitional Land Use designation a commercial land use amendment was sought in April, 1991. The petition was denied by City Commission on April 30, 1991. Parcels South of Atlantic Avenue: These parcels have a combination of County FLUM designations of INST-12 (Institutional - 12 units per acre) , Commercial, HR-8, and MR-5 (Medium Density Residential - 5 units per acre) , and County zoning designations of RM/SE (Residential Medium Density) and AR. The City advisory FLUM designation for all the properties is Transitional. The western most parcel approximately 18.8 acres received County approval for a congregate living facility (Delray Beach Senior Living Center). This development has not been constructed and the approved special exception is scheduled before the Board of County Commissioners in December to revoke the approval. No development proposals or inquires have been made for the balance of the parcels. The goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan were based upon data for this entire area. TIHXSTORY.DOC APPENDIX A CONT . I HIGHPOINT WEST COMBINED FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS TO THE CITY GENERAL FUND AD VALOREM TAXES .... (+)189,336.41 (+)189,336.41 PER CAPITA REIMBURSEMENTS 90.28 X 1995 (+)180,108.60 (+)180,108.60 UTILITY TAXES (+) 81,483.40 Electric (8% of average annual $917.74 bill) (+) 79,586.40 Cable (7% of annual bill) N/A Phone (7% of average annual 25.00 bill) (+) 1,897.00 NEW FRANCHISE FEES (+) 59,960.81 Electric (6% of average annual $917.74 bill) (+) 59,689.81 Cable (3% of annual bill) N/A Phone (1% of average annual $ bill) (+) 271. 00 STORMWATER ASSESSMENT UTILITY FUND ASSESSMENTS (+) 26,483.14 Stormwater Assessment .. (+) 26,483.14 SEWER & WATER UTILITY FUND FEES (-) 75,240.12 Water utilities (-) 32,583.72 Sewer Utilities (-) 42,656.40 COMBINED ANNUAL TOTAL (+)462,132.24 * based on proposed 1994/95 rate ** based on combined tax rate 7.95 mills \ APPENDIX B HIGH POINT WEST CONDOMINIUM IMPACT ON OWNER OCCUPIED UNIT (WITH HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION) FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: AD VALOREM TAXES (+) $71. 91 (Change in 1994/95 county rate of 20.2264 mills to City 94/95 rate of 25.1788 mills. Difference of 4.9524 mills. Ave. assessed value $39,521 NON AD VALOREM (+) $24.44 Stormwater Assessment Approx. $24.44 per unit Solid Waste Collection · unchanged WATER & SEWER UTILITY FEES (- ) $69.41 Current rate less 25% surcharge for out of City residents ANNUAL FINANCIAL IMPACT: (+) $26.94 SERVICE CONSIDERATIONS: FIRE RESPONSE + Faster response time based on increase proximity (3.2 miles verses 1,600 feet). EMS + Faster response time based on increase proximity (3 miles verses 1,600 feet) POLICE + Better response based upon more officers in field. CODE ENFORCEMENT + Pro-active verses reactive opportunity to work with homeowners * Pursuant to Florida Statute 171.062 the service provider will remain the same until the end of the current 5 year contract (September 30, 1998). In September of 1998 the Ci ty will have renegotiated the solid waste contract and the in City costs will be competitive with out of City costs. APPENDIX B CONT HIGH POINT WEST CONDOMINIUMS IMPACT ON OWNER OCCUPIED UNIT (WITHOUT HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION) FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: AD VALOREM TAXES (+) $195.72 (Change in 1994/95 county rate of 20.2264 mills to City 94/95 rate of 25.1788 mills. Difference of 4.9524 mills. Ave. assessed value $39,521 NON AD VALOREM (+) $24.44 Stormwater Assessment Approx. $24.44 per unit Solid Waste Collection · unchanged WATER & SEWER UTILITY FEES (-) $69.41 Current rate less 25% surcharge for out of City residents ANNUAL FINANCIAL IMPACT: (+) $150.75 SERVICE CONSIDERATIONS: FIRE RESPONSE + Faster response time based on increase proximity (3.2 miles verses 1,600 feet). EMS + Faster response time based on increase proximity (3 miles verses 1,600 feet) POLICE + Better response based upon more officers in field. CODE ENFORCEMENT + Pro-active verses reactive opportunity to work with homeowners * Pursuant to Florida statute 171.062 the service provider will remain the same until the end of the current 5 year contract (September 30, 1998). In September of 1998 the Ci ty will have renegotiated the solid waste contract and the in City costs will be competitive with out of City costs. APPENDIX B CONT. . ~ '. I PARCELS CURRENTlY Ü. "T- '--TTTTg~~:: .i.l.L__ __ - Uh "-.nr- RECEMNG I _...._.hm '-- .. - mnh...·· u .~: ~ ::- WJh: MUNICIPAL WATER SERVICE I.'~:. $' I' . .-, .~~.: hL,~.,-:'.i/' -.: ;.¡ ~~ ~ ~~.z )< ,:z, ' -:~-J'-, ~ ~ , .'. ," _,' . __ -U' \ : ~" "., ~ '--¡-TUT-- . "~ ' .=I_m_. - . ~l. '1 : Ai ", ---- )< . ' "~ ',' ,n: ......h '+.h· -¡-. , , ~, : I _; _~ h.__h·.'n_m , , ~ ~ ~ fÇf',~ ' ' ,."" " ,~ i fV" ',. ". '. .,<:,~~:~....: ',: , ' < :32. -·'·'1 ~ '" <' ~ "" "" """... . ' """". '. ._.hm· . ;,." '. . .R~ ihC'-- .....h' ~~.~" .'-,~~~ i ",-" æ· .";';.",- , "" . "'" , ..hm···r---·- , ." ."\.. .,;"l,.,.' '. ......' -'Y',G' .h.h···r--···'· - , ~,'''' ~ :'. , "¢ .-- . , Ì'O<I CITY LIMITS -.-------- ~ < ..)<; '. _~ . _,~ ."""-;-h.":;' PLANNING AREA _ _ _ _ _ _'."',~'~ '~" < &'''\}J :::fCh"hm' .~ A.,v. "888! < ,', , ,. h.J i ~ ,~~'2.' :~.. ", '. .' .0...0..._.____., ~~~~, ,- -,~~~ <>~ - ¡ , !: 3< ,< ,~- :__'__'h" f·hh- -- __-.. . .-.rr-¡-¡ < , : ~ ,. : ~:: =~ ~~I.I '" -.. ',: i' ill'!' I ?IE r.- I ¿', ~':' :..._... _.. ..'..._~ ~'. ,_.._' I .r " , h...__m.____. '" iu i l .,,, :, "" I '. .-'-- .. ~ ' ":h n --Ç(.-- -- : . II : 1 "''1'' "J ~' ", ',t .U.,·· J'I . i 'J' h". m.., " -- _m__ -- :~ þ'\ 1FT --:-'cru,"'r(lrf' ... , ····U,¡y 'I ii~"~ ! __ __m.·______.__. '.____ I: ¡- I"r~¡ --t '--'hr- ..-~.. --. .....¡;..... ;.' ." ¡ '.\:: _ J~ --.. -- :::. §. -" c; --., ~ -. I I. i I ¡ II t-; .. ':' i ~"'_ --..:: .-- ; I·:: ''''''' I 'I . I è , :.~:. : ,.Ci..~: . _m .:: 'T1 . ~:: h!i:: ;!~~ __ ::: I. '.' TTn +-:::.: \. _____.m_____n ___ I' --,. -j. n---(--- , I ,..__ ' .::: 1= I·' '", .n I~__ 1 . .n.. . eo-- H-- mt .....-.--- , I, .- N 1000 FEET - ." (2/BJi ~'~~,i ~I Ñ \ ~ ~ ~ I A\! .~"-J' Pl"NNINC DEPI\Rn.\ENT SCALE JI:: / .... ~ , . aTY OF DElRAY BEAæ. FL !Il ,(.Ä r ~. ~ I . u" .t.. -- DIG/TAL BASE: MAP 5r'STÐI -- FIGURE 1 . WATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS I.Ij WATER SE~CE AGREEMENTS WITH ANNEXATION CLAUSES. ~ WATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS, WITHOUT ANNEXATION CLAUSE. , ........""",. WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT, "''''....'''; WITH EXPIRED DEVELOPMENT ...."'....'" .... "'.... .... .... PROPOSAL. Wj RECEIVING WATER WITHOUT PROPERLY EXECUTED AGREEMENT. CITY LIMITS ---------- PLANNING AREA ------ [J . ,.:0. c::=J i N 1000 FEET - b I1\1\I\I\I I PLANNiNG DEPIIRlMENT SCALE CI TY OF DELRA Y BEACH. FL -- DIGITAL BASE MAP 5r5TÐ1 -- FIGURE 2 , ~ UNDEVELOPED ['-~.' '-¡-'Tn ..\ 'I~ I II ¡.' '11 II W I rl §u . OR -~..._ ..u __"u~1-.. T~ II u.~ .-: UNDERDEVELOPED PARCELS \[7 '¡'J ~., c;jjJj: ,- _~( 0 ~~ \ ........ -m'-"u, \ G 1-\ =::L u -rdJJ=! 1-\ -,. -- I u .. u..___n.un, ~:. T ' [T 11 \ ~ ~--------e :.:..' "III' .. , pO I'C ~..uu.___ ì u.,___..._ I ~ I LÞ-è;", ~ __ ~ I <EJ' ~- ~ 1 ./.' '.'" -- .- ~~=~~u._____nuu. r ~ ~ u_u, [.u.___, . u.~\y/~) 'I. r !J ¡tun ~ \, I I ~ E S 1 ' " .'__UU__¡L- I ~ m--u.u·r ~1 II" I J v.~~ I CITY LIMITS - - - - - · - - - - ß G ¡l- .... r__ uu__ __~/?'~;: PLANNING AREA - - - - - - I I, r--u. j'>u___ -11' __u. c-:J i i :---'1['- " ¡ il 1 u--.u·r··1 .. ___.uu C .___u__uu'u· .--.utiL·u ~ - Z ~ u__.u. .----~ ~ ~ ~I ¡¡f~.. "'!rrrm'~il' ~ ~u.--u..JoI:..:.~ < t:::L..::, --1.!..U -Y. ~___u__ þ, I ~ ~J _ E L R ,., '( '1' -J :!. I : '7 0 1-- J \ I ¡ ¡ ¡ i ¡ : I; r i· ~ ~ " \ C ,., Luu._____.un. u___.Uu____. ~ i-j-··· . -W·'· '¡il!i fEEIllE1I1J,. ¡ ¡,-¡: \~ ~ M <- \.I r-- - - --.: . - .,.. U.' - . -. .-itJ. ¡'IT"" l---T." Tt.. -. '....- '.- -- --J' 4 I __ ' '. . . . I[! ì II I . I " ". ' ~ E to! 1 E R . VI'" L ~ ...;,~. __.'! 1..1 ¡ ¡! I r ! I [I I I !. lï.llU. r_,~_, C . M ,., R 1 ~ u I ·11 Ii' i ¡ Ii! 'II IT mil rr I ! ¡ = r--'<" Ii I II' I IIT...ft: ,--iI' I I" ---. ) _____u__u. ________u'uu.'___... __u____. l::'--<I .' .' 1...1 i' I --' u '..--.' ..... . :::::j --·.L I I nTi' "-~i T I >:::::::..~ ¡ --,'. ,"",,,,,' : :'l':::JII ¡III 'i"'I'::"::1 - '......... -- :.::.. :::.,! I I T! i'" "II 77:! II I f- \Z:: T. [ , ' '" ,; , . \- ,.;: __ :.::: :!! ,¡ 111 ¡; ¡.. Ì" '._' __ ' .. i ! i ," ¡ ~ .. . , I! ¡ i ¡ [ I [ . f-.= (- I-- =: i ! I 11""+ .-j- ... . -r _,.. (~ '- u. i . ! . , " !! ¡ ¡ I r I T'1h- /-~';:: n l == l¡ I I : ¡ .1 '1 I'! . en__ - ___u. ___nhn --- ".T ' '. '. '. '.' '. f ' .'u, , L,.I_Á - I \ i,! -¡' -:- - - ...~- T." (:,- -;- -iT - --:--- ,t.. /':" ~ : ! H'+--+h 'I +f·f I! ~ ì : :.' 1(\ ,'-' ~ '~m.T - ::: :a'>~" ~~: ~~' ~I / bm ¡mçg I ~ Y (( \-.. ""J ¡. PLANNING DEPAR1MENT sC'\LE' / /' ~ ! CITY Of DELRAY BEACH. FL I\. ~(;: r ~,h~ .J .LI. -- DIGITAL BASE: MAP SYSTEJJ -- i ' FIGURE 3 , TAXABLE VALUES AND POTENTIAL AD VALOREM REVENUE TAXABLE POTENTIAL PARCEL VALUE REVENUE A $3,642,117 $28,954 8 23,888,230 189,911 C 19.063.138 151,551 0 2,546.990 20,248 E 18,447,037 146,653 I F 38.540.897 306,399 CllY LIMITS ---------- PLANNING AREA - - - - - - ....____..~n___ uH______.H_ 'c___L ---] ~ -- ., n___nn______ __n___________._ -!ill) _ n_ jl'; U " \~' ~~ LLn_L_ -'~\ I_n'_~;___~ -¡¡ uu··_n.._hu N 1000 FEET - b ~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL -- OIGITAL BASE IMP SYSTEM -- FIGURE. 4 , "d HI~ c: C1 :Þ' )0 ....H >2j tzj Ö tJ: ~ 0...· r1" ='r1" 1ir1" .... '" '" '" '" '" n þJ ::r .... o .... ti 'd .... a tII iiI» r1" !Ð O=' =' ":3 "dO=: 0 0~C1 r;~ c.n=: Z~ 0 'd=' Otnli'tl>2je¡)C: 1i0 0 Ii HI 0 0 HI!ÐO .... 0 ~ !Ð !Ð tn nr1"!Ð!ÐIiI»r1" !Ðr1" ('t o HltII r:: )o~~ !Ð I» :Þ'IO M'n Ii ~ !Ð nO....lil»tII.... tII !Ð PI a ....'d =' I» Ii n::r 0:0;- r1"1» Ii r::1iŠ- =' .... r::p. .... !Ðn.... r1" r1"p.!Ð r1" Ii'ö .... 0 .... r1" <: 'Ca on 0)"'. .... III ='!Ðr1" ~ ....!Ð11 !Ð 0 1:""1» Z !Ð .... .... 1»~r::I»::r. r1" M'r1" I» tII I» I»::sn "d .... I=' tIIO n r1" I» Ii 'd .... c.n '<: tII::r p.......... ='r1".... ...... :Þ'=' wp. Z )0 .. =' !Ð ...·r1"tII....tII* I» !ÐI:""..... C1 r1"....1» I» 10M' '" ~ m n o !Ð CD r1" CD ... 1-3 HIM' ...·x .... ....1».... N "d m r::r1" >2j ='lial» I» Ii =' !Ð r:: n......... I» "d~ 01» þJ þJ 11::r CD I» CD >2j ~ o ~ r1"p. 0' I» I» Ii tn Ii !Ð !Ð ....:Þ'='~!Ð CD 9::r 0.... ~r; 1i:Þ' =':0;- m !Ð tII tIIr1"!ÐCD tII .... ::s n :Þ' np. I» tzj ::SO .. I:""tIItII<:tII .. M'.... I» n CD CD CDW. ....tn Ö r1" .... ....!Ð !Ð .. ::r!Ð .... 11 I» ....1» r:: ....r1" n tII HI ::s CD CD n 0' ~ '<:'<: !Ðtlllir:: 'tI I» tII tn !Ð ~ =,aoCD'tI ::r HIP. ::s 11 tII tII!Ða..::r 0 0 r1" c:: CD !Ð =' 0 ::s ....<: þJ n r:: r1"n =' CD ....1» m !Ðr1" >2j ....:Þ'!Ð 0.... ..... .... .... !Ð >2j 10 '0 -..J ~o )0 "d <:.... !Ð!ÐI»'d.... * ...·Ii m 0 .... .... tII!Ðl1li* .. ::s !Ð .... m t-3 ::Sr1" . tII !Ð 0 .. lOa ,þ w '" ...... ,þ þJ tz:I 10'<: ... r1" ~ tzj 01 0) -..J '" \0 '" ,þ m ~ r1" .... tzj .... tIIr1" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. m OHl CD a.... !Ð o I» 0 c.n -..J 0) 0 0) \0 tz:I H ....r:: I» !Ð n r:: ~ w ,þ ,þ -..J 01 ,þ -..J Ö ~ r1"=' r1"M'n M' 11 \0 0 -..J 0 W 0 -..J ,<:p. I»CDr1" Ii n.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ ~ .... Ii .... CDtII 01 0) 0 01 .... \0 .... ~ ~ ~ .. '<: .... n tII 01 \0 W .... W 0 0) t'I 1».... n ..rt -..J -..J -..J 0 0) 0 VI c:: r1".... tII\O \0 ::r tz:I ~ -I CD.... 1»001 . CD Ii ..... * c.n s » . tII !Ð ",.. * 'd CD tIIO) 11 Ö ~ CD C1 - .... t-3 þJ CJ r1"'C I» C1 9 .... ~ ti :s:: I» I»!ÐO' 0 I» 0 w .... ...... '" ~ ~11""" ~ ~ 01 0) 0) '" \0 W W )0 " r p. .. CD .. .. .. .. .. .. .. tø 0< tz:I CD 'tS CD .... VI ,þ c.n 0 0) 01 ti < m n I»CDw 11 \Q '" ,þ ,þ ,þ 01 co ,þ tz:I Þ2 tzj 11 ='11* n !Ð 0) 0 -..J 01 W 0) '" þJ ~ CD P. tII .. .... ::s .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ i!) I» 0 I» CD ,þ 0) 0 \0 .... '" .... tz:I ~ tII tII='Z .... 11 0 \0 W \0 W W ...... =: m CD r1" I» - PI \0 -..J -..J 0 0) 0 -..J c:: I» 1M' .. M' tz:I 'Ø >2j .... rt r:: 0 t 0 =' !Ðali 0) 11 " 1»1» * 11 11 u..... 0 Q Z m !Ð !Ð 0 - HI þJ H þJ <: <:lie¡) :xl tøz z ti CD CD I» CD .... C::tz:I e¡) þJ =' ='tIItII tII =' ~~ 0 r:: r:: 0 .... n )0 t-3 CD !Ðr::VI p. 0 " þJ Ii* CD ~ t-3 t1iI Ö ~ tII n ... ::s 0 :Þ' .... ::r!Ð rt -..J '" .... .... .... -I'd I'd M' I» tII .... ~ W 01 '" .... W 0'1 '" O'Itz:I " ::r Ii PI .... 0 VI 0'1 -..J .... ,þ c.n ~~ 0 ........ .... r1" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 'tI M' =' =' - ::r .... .... \0 VI .... W 0 0)t-3 þJ ::r IOn .. 0'1 0'1 .... '" VI VI VI -H ~ !Ð .... I» .... .... c.n w ,þ ...... -..J Z Hlr:: 0 =' Q H Ii r::p. I» ::s tz:I !Ð ::s !Ð 0' !Ð m 9 p. .... ~ ~ 0 tII'tS !Ð CD <: ... CD P. tz:I I» Ii -..J Ö m .... * 'tS tz:I t-3 n .. Ii tø 0 I» 0 -":3 0 HI It Z 'd .... .... >2j .... I» !Ð .... ,þ .... '" '" . m r1" M' M' Ii w .... \0 '" 0 VI w otz:l :s:: ::r PI r:: M' .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....." H CD Ii .... c.n '" ..... -..J W VI 0) -< ti I» CD VI w w '" \0 0'1 \0 H H '" .... m c.n 0) 0) c.n ..... 0 -..J 0 ~ VI tz:I * I» :xl P. 0< tn P. 1-3 r:: .... 11 r1" ~ ~ n .... ::r 0 H I» =' 0) W .... .... ...... I:"" Ii I» ,þ 0 ,þ '" VI 0) '" <":3 10 .... w 01 0'1 0 .... \0 0) ~~ CD .. .. .. .. .. .. .. -..J W 01 '" VI \0 \0 10 .... \0 c.n ,þ VI ...... VI " 01 \0 W 0) .... .... ,þ t1iI :s:: 'I I . . . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER fJ/1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # WS .3 - MEETING OF OCTOBER 11, 1994 WATER STORAGE ALTERNATIVES/SOUTHWEST AREA DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1994 This is before the Commission to present alternatives for provi- sion of required water storage capacity in the southwest area in accordance with Water Distribution Master Plan recommendations. Alternatives include 2MG Ground Storage/Booster Pump Facility, 2MG Underground Storage/Booster Pump Facility, and Aquifer Storage and Recovery Well (ASR) at the Germantown Road location. Additional information will be provided either prior to or at the meeting on October 11, 1994. . I . .... .- Aqenda Itell No. W S ð AGENDA REOUEST Date: 10/05/94 Request to be placed on: Reqular Aqenda special Aqenda XX Workshop Aqenda When: 10/11/94 Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Staff to report to Commission on alternatives for provision of required water storage capacity in southwest area per Water Distribution Master Plan recommendations and request direction from commission. Al ternati ves to include 2MG Ground Storage/Booster Pump Facility; 2MG underground storage/Booster Pump Facility; Aquifer Storage & Recovery Well (ASR) at Germantown Road location. ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: J__/HQ DRAFT ATTACHED J__/HQ Recommendation: ø~ ~' DEPARTMENT HEAD SIGNATURE: !?, /'-J- 4- if I I Determination of consistency with comprehensive Plan: City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) Budget Director Review (required on all items involvinq expenditure of funds): Fundinq available YES/NO Fundinq alternatives (if applicable) Account No. , Description Account Balance City Manaqer Review: Approved for aqenda: &/NO ~ Hold until: Aqenda Coordinator Review: Received: Placed on Aqenda: Action: Approved/Disapproved (-'! MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden, city Manager FROM: (}fRlchard C. Hasko, Deputy Director, Public Utilities SUBJECT: SOUTHWEST 2 MILLION GALLON (M.G.) STORAGE TANK (PN 94-004) DATE: October 7, 1994 In accordance with recommendations set forth in the City's Water Distribution Master Plan and with funding dedicated in the 1993 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond, we have initiated the land acquisition process to obtain a parcel of suitable area to accommodate the proposed 2 M.G. Ground Storage Tank and associated Booster Pump facility in the southwest quadrant of the city. Per the Master Plan, this facility should be sited on Germantown Road between Linton Boulevard and the Lake Worth Drainage District E-4 Canal. The City currently owns a 0.42 acre parcel of land located on the north side of Germantown Road, approximately 350 feet east of Homewood Boulevard, shown as Tract J on the recorded plat of The Crosswinds Phase II subdivision. This parcel was dedicated to the City by plat, for a water storage area, in 1982. Since this parcel is not large enough to accommodate the proposed facility, I met with the Crosswinds Master Association in July 1994, to pursue the purchase of additional contiguous property. Subsequently, the Association notified their residents of the City's proposal, at which time there was widespread and dramatic reaction to the proposed storage tank project. The residents are in unanimous opposition to locating a facility of this magnitude (100 foot diameter tank, approximately 40 feet high) in this predominately residential area. Alternatives to the fore stated concept include acquisition of an alternate site in the same vicinity, construction of an underground storage facility or implementing Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) technology at the Crosswinds site. While there are vacant properties of sufficient size to accommodate the proposed facility along Germantown Road, anticipated acquisition costs are estimated between $135,000.00 and $160,000.000, and opposition will be strong due to the residential composition of the area. " Construction of an underground facility is geometrically possible on the Crosswind site. However, the cost of the facility would increase by 50% to 100% due to the necessary depth (approximately 30 feet) to obtain the required volume of storage. Construction of an ASR well on the Crosswinds site is a feasible, non-intrusive, alternative and would provide several other significant enhancements to the water distribution system. The Master Plan estimate for the traditional 2 M.G. storage Tank and Booster Pump Station is $2.6 million. This figure includes $80,000.00 for land acquisition. The cost to construct an underground facility of this magnitude will exceed $4.0 million. The current cost estimate for construction of an ASR and Booster Pump facility is $1. 5 million. We anticipate a post development storage capacity of 60 M.G. in the ASR. In addition, this capacity can be made available citywide by constructing a main connection from the ASR to the Morikami raw water main proposed along Sherwood Boulevard to Dover Road and the Municipal Golf Course. In this manner, recovered water can be transmitted back to the Water Treatment Plant for distribution to the entire city, if needed. In synopsis, implementation of ASR technology in lieu of the traditional water storage facility at the Germantown Road site will meet system requirements in the southwest quadrant of the city while providing significant additional benefits and flexibility in the system operation, maintaining the residential flavor of the area and reducing the capital investment by approximately $1.1 million. On the foregoing basis, we are recommending implementation of an ASR well at the Germantown Road site as a more cost effective alternative to the current storage tank proposal. RCH:cl Attachment cc: William H. Greenwood File: Project No. 94-004 " , MASTER PLAN PROPOSAL 2.0 M.G. Tank/Pump Station $2,600,000.00 20" Water Main - Dover Road/Linton Boulevard 940,000.00 (potable distribution) Current Master Plan Cost Estimate $3,540,000.00 Program Benefit: 0 Increase pressure in southwest area distribution system. 0 Adequate fire flow supply in southwest area. 0 Additional 2 M.G. storage in southwest area.* *Note: Capital cost/M.G. storage = $1,300,000.00 (excluding 20" water main cost). ASR PROPOSAL ASR Well/Pump Station $1,500,000.00 12" Water Main - Dover Road/Linton Boulevard 540,000.00 (Return to Water Treatment Plant) ASR Program Cost Estimate $2,040,000.00 Program Benefit: 0 Increase pressure in southwest area distribution system. 0 Adequate fire flow supply in southwest area. 0 Additional 60 M.G.+ storage available citywide.* *Note: Capital cost/M.G. storage at 75% recovery = $45,333.00 (including 12" Water Treatment Plant return line). . , CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT , , ! , i I ,\ AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY TECHNOLOGY ¡ AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO TRADITIONAL A~OVE GROUND STORAGE \ FOR SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST ABOVE GROUND STORAGE FACILITIES 1.0 PROPOSAL A. Implement "Aquifer storage and Recovery Technology" in lieu of "Traditional Above Ground Storage. II B. Advantages of ASR 0 Emergency supply 0 Land Requirements 0 Cost 0 Peak Demand C. Potential Cost savings 0 s.w. Facility Master Plan - $2,600,000 Proposed ASR - _(1,500,000l Potential Savings- $1,100,000 0 N.E. Facility (Currently Being Designed) Master Plan - $1,600,000 Proposed ASR Jl,SOO,OOOl Potential Cost savings $ 100,000 Design Cost to Date Jl00,OOOl Net savings $ 0 1&1 .c>- ' ~ c» 01= œ 01'" ::10 e .. Ai DD...c»c» '1... ... .c .c c .c O -- ..... 0 ... ... c» ... ~ ~ ;;",,0 ti ~ ... C» III... ... ."..... M C .. C~ C»= C» ~~ ~ ::I -- :> C» E 1&1 0 DIe~... ... C C» D LL.~ . e' -- Ai ...0 W C A# C» .:.: .... l!= 0 I... " C,,__._ ::::11&1 C -¡: ce;o 1; 0> =:JQ D~ZJ! œo C» " " C» 01_5 · ~ .c C» C» E c .~ I ..... . ... ... ... -- ~ ~I&I M D,~ D _!: ... Ai -- C» -__ ~ ::I C I I... .A#~ C a'"D ~ I 1- - C» C» .c ! ~... M.c~... ! ~o__..._ ':I: ;: . . , , , Q it: ~ 1&1 CD lIIu ~ 0 ~z: Q) Q:: ~o ~u ~ III ~> CD C) ... 1110 c .c LU 0 Q) I Q:: ::::Jill ( ) 0),.... o~ j o~ .co ...Æ~ ... I , ~ , 2.0 BACKGROUND I I , A. citizen Reaction to S.W. Above GroundJ I storage Facility I ¡ 0 crosswinds of Delray Association, Inc.- opposed , . \ 0 Other Germantown Road Res1dents - Opposed B. citizen Reaction to N.E. Above Ground storage Facility 0 Homeowners Association - Favorable ( 1) Tank size for 0.5 million gallon tank is ~amouflaged by residential designed booster station (2) Unaware of Aquifer storage and Recovery Alternative C. Technical 0 supporting Documentation (1) Raw Water Master Plan 1991 - Proposal for ASR (2 ) Water Distribution Master Plan 1992 - Requirements for fire flow and system pressure (3) Delray's comprehensive Plan - Implementation of ASR 0 ASR Proven Technology (1) . (6) Wells operational in S1X Florida, February 1994 (2 ) Eleven (11) Wells in Development February 1994 I " I 1-' ::> 0: (/)1 II~ Wi. (/)'~ 5il Ii 0..' ~! ::>1 o..~ . In ._ nn r .,,1 .,,, ~h 'u.~ "H .\\ 'u.a ".,' T II., .\\. J i (HI ¡!i: II Ii :t:: to ~" , ¡¡!¡ !ii: ¡ ~ \! t " .. I lip ¡ It,: I I i ~I i W! , ~I i , I '~ W'" ! I' (/)¡~ I 5;1 I 0.. ~: ::>, 0.. LL L , ,J 7 0\ 0\ ~ ;>. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (j) ~ r-. r:/1 ~ U ~ ~ 0 ~ -- .. c ~ c ~ C QJ C E c E 0 c. '';:: c. '';:: c ~ - s... o ~ ~ ~ ~ ., - s... ..... QJ QJ , C. ., ~ 'f1 ~ ~ ...... QJ C. =. '-' r:/1 ..... Q I"", :::: ::: ~ c c - c c ~ - - ~ ~ ..... - ::c N . ~ ::: ~ ~ u 3.0 PLAN A. significantly increase storage capacity for the City, while reducing costs. I \ I i I $4,200)000 ~ 0 2.5 Million Gal. storage @ or 120 Million Gal, storage @ $3,000,000 , Sub Total $1,200,000 \ Design Cost to Date 100,000 Potential Cost savings $1,100,000 0 2.5 Million Gallons Above Ground storage = $1,700,000/million gal. 0 120+ Million Gallons ASR Wells - $25,000/million gal. - B. Emergency Water Supply 0 Supplemental Emergency Water supply (1) 120+ Million Gallons vs 2.5 Million Gallons (2 ) 17 Days Emergency Water supply at 7.2 mgd. vs 8 hours at 7.2 mgd. \ " . I ~ .,. \T. I&. ~ :: c 0 D- C» D- E ~ :::I " '" C» .. C ,> .- ø :::I .~ \I E c a- ~ C» I C» '" C .. z: C» ... " ~ E M C ø i u.I 8 ~ C» D- . I. I ¡Q . . \ l\T. \ , I . 4.0 HOW IT WORKS , A. Current ASR Applications I ! , ~ i Water Treatment for Emergency Reser~~ ~ 0 (1) Wash Water Recovery Basins (2) pumping/Facilities I (3) Disinfection Facilities B. Proposed Innovative Application 0 Remote Water Distribution storage and pumping (1) Reinforces water storage capacity out in water distribution system, where it is needed. (2) Emergency supplement for raw water supply wells. (3) (i.e. ASR combines advantages of remote storage and pumping, plus emergency supply). I . . w~æCl) CI)<ä:c a: ...J ::>CI)-w o!:!:!~ü: oa:;2...J U.w-Lrl ...JCI)a:~ .. 0'0 , CJ2~ J'; $. " " ~ . :Q /P. W. . I! .J'; ... ......... .......... ..~ a::::I Y);æ: Cl)W ~s:~ <~ >- s:~o Çc~ OCð¡t Œ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~Li: 8~ ~ . . ~ ~~ W ~ ~~ ~ ~~( ) a::5 I I-a.. q:::5~ a: W ~ c& UJ~§:~ ;: ~ , (!)(!) tt ~ ~ ~lI./moq: I , ~ ~ ~~ð~ r . I I Q: <: I ~~~LIJ I ~ ~e . 5;::1:c:~ ~~~~ " 3 .l ... .-' J ~ .. þ\~~~\ l i! _ 'aI. II .. I IIIU -.. -......: ~ . , :";b r!jl-nJllh Ik: ~~\ I \ ;~_ _t:I~ ~. ¡ ~ · !l)~ ~t:M" 0.., ~\ .. .. ~ .. I! - ¡~, S to:.... I :i: i ¡ I It î, I"""'" ¡ ~~...,/. .. ,\.47 ~ ~ I _....~ I~_. )'/7 ,. ~ @ , iI') fj , c .. .. .. þ ---. ~ d t .. .. t... I ~~ 14 .. . -c.. __... ~ I 10- , .-\~, ~ ï"t 7Z~u- ~f¿~ I "" ~ ~ ~ . ~~ I~ r I - - J~ = \t 10_- .. N ~ 0.)f*'J.-. C,,\ I I.. : ,.. .. I: I(j....} !II . , + . ~ ('-Ã)~':5 .. · j . '~,L ~f? I~ ~.~ ¡~~/II hI ...z~ ,,0.1ü....J '- ~~Q9/' ~ .Ii / ~ III III II -- , I~~..··} L I - - "~/~ .. ¿ ~ !ff1I ..; ft .:1' tc.. ~I i f/ 1 , Ie c' I) . -~ ~ ' , 1 I) . 1 ~ ~'/)d ""'.... ... n. ~ ! ~: ~ffi 1 ; i l~ .. (\. ~ : IW~) :~ - - ~~ :. ' - '\ -. ¡ I C I ¡ ~ - .,.... .....,.... I ~ I ~I fr I ~ rL _ i .. i ,JI un 1 IS! . ~ ~ .~ ,-.. ~ ' _ I z '/1J ~ I ' I ) ~+ / J'IJj ! I" -0-'-'7 II I · '---J...l). I;' / ; /, + I i I --- ~ I ~..~ C -,¿ - :z ~ ' ~, ~ S , ~ I ~-f r-- J" .-: -/, . I It ' -.....; ~ 8 d ~ ! I I~.. ~, ~ =......'t'i I' 'IL t{~ l~ ~ ~. , ¡ 4 "m I . ..... ,.iff'! I'..' ~ . m.. .. , . Y 11 1 '" . J ¡\... ~ I ~ r £1. E A II V 1 I 1 I .. \mc¿-. . 'J ~. p :~:~m ~ .( ~ ~ j_~ ~ . n · .f _.~ ~~~,~~ , .... Ï } J ~r rr JI · , ~ .' ót.-~ P!!!! II' -1) \1 . 'I. '1" ..J ~'" :-l . J., \~ ~ ~II ~o 'l:1~ \1 ì . ! I L5 " : : '" . ~. T ..., · ~... .. L '-:-J ,\ ......%>JI j ~ ~ 1.\ I . ~1IIIat.Jt... ~ 0 j ;:; ~ ~ " I . ... '-..!' - -"-' ~ ~ ¡i - I - -..;;. >-= ~ I·-;;;;;-~ ... ".;~. II , I - ..... . " ".~ 2. 'I · ..., -;, I . '!!!! '" .. · --¡. ~ I- b'N , ifi.. ~ I - - i .- ,1_ , ~ ... - ,- - J "14¡r, ". _ ...- ",c, "" .... ". '. '1 ~ - II;"'" !l .~ .. L.. ~ ( '- " .'" · - r.. 1:"., ... " ::! "'"'" .... _ _. .. - Ii.. "1 ~ ~ . -,; I 1&1 · I _ a... ~ · · n .. "" ". - ~ . _~.~ _ ~LI! '< "".. .. 'I! -HI. J" .. I ~I II.... i I ~ .. ,.. ". I. "'"" .... , R """"" -'-' ...- _ ~ ~ - . '" I ~ 1oL...". . . ".~_ ~ " >i ~ ¡:i: 6 6 Ii!::::: '< \ ft ~" ....... _ ~ 0 ! :--~ ~..." . ~ - lm1r;=: ~ II .r. J.. C . ....... ~ '--- - - . ~ . ..~ .... ~ ~ =:I ~ '" r. 141M sr. ~ .---¡ ¡e:;- ~ b ~ A J ~ '1._ "0 ~ "-~ r .. ,... I ...... C . .. -~ - ., ~ I 1 ,.., - ft. ~ ~ ~ ,_ ,. -1 ~ I .~ . J .. - IF" = ~ -1 - - '. · '" [l [" n n ___ '.. ,,,. n. ~ gl - ;;JI- ':: -- 0 · , .--c: I::::. L..J '- , . -- # ~'- - I ,I. n ...' n ~ n. --'. ....... ~.. ..!!! ".. """"I. _ _ .. ""-- - . .I~~ ~_ II'< __ , __. __ _ - ~ ". ~ _1... .--- '( . .. -- · .... n !,~ ~ 1 ""'" I c:: .1If-. II~ toIy __ .. .. - II " . IL ~n IU .... _ "'" ~ .. II ..." a.. ~ R ~~~ r....,.- _ ~. IRI . a'O.JJM J~ _ ~ ' . ~ . _ ' UD._ -- L.....J' . .. _. iÞ IECIIOC ~ J _ G: =- ILJ ~ ..'- I ...1:.11 CT. II ~... 1&1 n ,- .. ,N " ~'7III'r~ DO .1.....1 ,1+ ~ I .. . ~ ~ - ..., -llT.'J ~ - ~l · 1Ir. ""'_ rt ..1.Jlt.. r rø r.: fl ;, . .... ~:;:o. .. . _ " - OM " ~ '. , L ML :£.....- '< IJA- - ." I ... . _ ~ _ ~ .. · IL>-. _ -~ ,- ". I " _ W " ë _ _. ': ., . ' · .. ;;;.,", --' t ~ ~ ¡ Ii .- ... Ii .~ E ~ ~ _~': _I · = ¡ ~'~ :riLl ~IISt1r .rlf Ii ~ G:__...... Ø' .f ~ ~ ".\ ~{r ~II , l.q ""/ -- 1.6 ~ .:J"- r~ , , r.,- 5.0 CITY COMMISSION DIRECTION AND GUIDANCE A. support of our ASR proposal \ , i I I \ B. Direction to stop design on N.E. tank 'near Plumosa Elementary and Atlantic High School on N.E.' 3rd Avenue. I C. Direction to impleme¥t a feasibility study estimated at $25,000- to be completed within 60 days of authorization. , , , . 6.0 NEXT STEP . A. Assumptions I \ , i \ \ \. 0 ASR is a feasible alternative 0 Highest priority ~s N.E. quadrant 0 Design ASR for N.E. quadrant w/current I funding 0 Design ASR for S.W. quadrant w/future Connection fees B. Proposed project Funding 0 Current N.E. Tank ( '93 Bond) $1,367,500 balance 0 Available from Current Enqr. 87,000 Contractor 0 Current '93 Bond project 488,500 Surplus 0 Deferred '93 bond Projects: 1. N. Barwick Rd. 12" W.M. 88,100 2. Ridgewood Rd. 12" W.M. 206.300 0 Total Available Current $2,237,400 Funds 0 Required Funding Level - N.E. Quadrant 1. ASR/Booster Pump $1,500,000 Facility 2. 12" Return Main to 500.000 Water Treatment Plant 3. Total $2,000,000 . , - DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: David T. Harden City Manager ~ FROM: William H. Greenwood ~ Director of Environmental Services DATE: October 5, 1994 SUBJECT: North Federal Highway Resurfacing and Median Modifications Project No. 94-76 Attached is an agenda request for the October 11, 1994 workshop meeting to discuss the latest plans by D.O.T. for the subject project. Exhibits will be presented at the workshop meeting as D.O.T. has only provided one copy of the proposed plan, which will not reproduce adequately to display the latest modifications. WG:DB:mm File: Project No. 94-76 (A) WG476005.MRM J1/ s· 1 ., · - Agenda Item No.: fAl S .1- AGENDA REOUEST Date: October 5, 1994 Request to be placed on: _____ Regular Agenda _____ Special Agenda ~ Workshop Agenda When: October 11, 1994 Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Review, discussion and comment oil the revised plans bv Florida D.O.T. for the Resurfacinq and Median Modifications on Federal Hiqhwav from Bond Way to North City Limits. ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES,@ DRAFT ATTACHED YES@) Recommendation: For discussion Department Head Signature: ¡J/d~ /'1~~~;/ Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds) : Funding available: YES/NO Funding alternatives (if applicable) Account No. & Description Account Balance City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: @/NO trÞ1 Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: Placed on Agenda: Action: Approved/Disapproved File: AG476005.MRM 'I " . North Federal Highway Resurfacing and Median Modifications 10-11-94 Bond Way: Eliminates south bound exit. South Lake Ave: Eliminates south bound entrance and exit. North Lake Ave: Eliminates south bound entrance and exit. Lake Ave: Unchanged. Eastview Ave: Eliminates south bound exit. Royal Palm Blvd.: Eliminates south bound entrance and exit. Allen Ave: Eliminates south bound exit. Swap Shop: Unchanged. Borton Volvo: Eliminates south bound exit. Gulfstream Blvd.: Unchanged. Additional Modifications: A north and south bound U-turn median opening has been added between Borton Volvo and Gulfstream Blvd. D.G.T. Criteria for Median Openings: Unrestricted median opening separation is 1320' Restricted median opening separation is 660' ·