08-03-93 Special/Workshop
"
CITY OF OELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA - CITY COMMISSION
SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING - AUGUST 3. 1993 - 6:00 P.M.
COMMISSION CHAMBERS
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where
necessary . to afford an individual with a disability an equal
opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,
program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug
Randolph, (407) 243-7127, at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the
program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate
your request.
APPELLATE PROCEDURES
Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made
by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this
meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these
proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that
a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes
the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The
City does not provide or prepare such record.
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
Pursuant to Section 3.07 of the City Charter of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, Mayor Thomas E. Lynch has instructed me to advise you
of a Special Meeting of the Commission to be held in the Commission
Chambers at 6 P.M. on Tuesday, August 3, 1993.
This meeting has been called for the purpose of considering the
following:
~~. Presentation of Proclamation - Oelray Beach National Little
eague.
~ Decade of Excellence Bond Issue Repayment Schedule.
3. Fiscal Year 1993/94 Budget and Proposed Millage Rate for Fiscal
, ear 1993/94.
~ Approval of Road Construction Agreements with William Swaim and
ssociates. tv ~'f(bL }f~lIdiir
. ~\\) ~~~~~~Q6
V@ ~\~
Alison MacGregor Harty
City Clerk
*(The worksession will be held in the First Floor Conference Room).
WORKSHOP AGENDA
~ Review of Tennis Center Phase II Plans.
(!) Summary of Public Meetings reo Municipal Golf Course Club House.
3. Lake Ida Road Beautification Proposal (Military Trail to Congress
Avenue) .
4. Commission comments.
.. >'II.'
"
CITY DF DELRAY BEA[H
'00 " :, -.,:: ,--1= -=--:_.::;...... -<:'_,_""1 -__~ ''::':'' _~":'J":'
nUn 1. 1\/1' 1/1\
WHEREAS, the Delray Beach National Little League,
Major League All-Stars are a group of talented eleven and
twelve year olds who recently represented our community in
the Palm Beach County Championships; and,
WHEREAS, the Delray Beach National Little League,
Major League All-Stars distinguished themselves by winning
the District 7 Palm Beach County Championships for the
second time in 11 years; and,
WHEREAS, the team also went undefeated in the
tournament for the second consecutive year; and,
WHEREAS, by winning the District title they
advanced to the Sectional Championship in Kendall, Florida,
where they competed against championship teams from Dade,
Broward, Martin, St. Lucie and Brevard Counties; and,
WHEREAS, by winning the Sectional Championship
they advanced to the Florida State Championship in Citrus
Park, Florida, where they competed as one of the top four
, teams from a field of three hundred sixty (360) Florida
Little League teams; and,
WHEREAS, they defeated Little League teams from
Sarasota, Florida and Oviedo, Florida to become Florida
State Champions; and,
WHEREAS, by winning the Florida State Championship
they are one of the thirteen teams to advance to the
Southeast Regional Championship in St. Petersburg, Florida;
and,
WHEREAS, the players, coaches and parents of the
Delray Beach National Little League, Major League All-Stars
are to be commended for their professionalism, skill and
sportsmanship in representing the City of Delray Beach.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. L YNC H , Mayor of the
City of Delray Beach, Florida, on behalf of the City
Commission do hereby off ic ially honor the Delray Beach
National Little League, Major League All-Stars for their
District 7, Sectional, and Florida State Championships, and
wish them continued success at the Southeast Regional Finals
in St. Petersburg, Florida against their opponents from
Arkansas on August 10, 1993.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and caused the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach,
Florida, to be affixed this 3rd day of August, 1993.
MAY 0 R
THOMAS E. LYNCH
SEAL
~/I
'. . I ,~,
.,
. , 2J)<
ty!A;1
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden
city Manager
FROM: Rebecca S. O'Connor
,
~ Treasurer
THRU: Joseph M. Safford ~ b---
Director of Finance
SUBJECT: structuring of Proposed General Obligation Debt Service
DATE: July 30, 1993
Public Financial Management ( PFM) , our financial advisors, has provided us
with two different financing scenarios for the proposed 1993 General
Obligation Bond Issue. The purpose of the scenarios was to compare a
declining debt service with a wrap around or level debt structure in order to
evaluate the millage impact of different financing techniques.
The current debt structure is declining. The new debt service can be "laid"
on top of the existing debt resulting in a total declining debt service. The
wrap around debt alternative would "wrap" the new debt around the old debt
resulting in level debt service.
For comparison purposes, both scenarios assumed a 6% total interest cost, a
20-year term, a closing date of October 1, 1993 and typical issuance costs.
A summary of the two scenarios is as follows:
Projected New Added Annual Total Debt Total Debt
Debt Service Debt Service Service Service
Scenario Millage FY 93-94 FY 93-94 New Issue All Issues
I. Declining 0.3412 $797,839 $16,682,585 $43,494,870
II. Wrap Around 0.1782 $416,684 $18,489,165 $45,301,450
III. Difference 0.1630 $381,155 $ 1,806,580 $ 1,806,580
The wrap around debt service results in an approximately $1.8 million more in
debt service over the life of the new issue. However, there is a net present
value of savings of approximately $100,000 when compared to the declining debt
scenario (see page 5 of the backup). As you can see from the column titled
"Present Value Difference in New Money Debt Service" the present value savings
for the wrap around scenario occurs in the first half of the issue and are
offset by costs in the latter years, which costs the City less in terms of
today's dollars.
jf> /:2.-
..
"
David T. Harden, City Manager
July 30, 1993
Page Two
We, therefore, recommend the wrap around debt structure for the upcoming bond
issue, providing we have similar market conditions at the time of sale. The
wrap around level debt structure provides for fairly level debt service over
the life of the bond issue, has the least amount of impact on debt millage, as
well as, being the most cost effective scenario when compared on a net present
value basis with the declining debt service scenario.
RSo/sam
Attachment
'.
-
. . DRAFT
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA For Discussfon
GENERAL OBLIGA nON BONDS, SERIES 1993 PUrposes Only
DECLINING DEBT SERVICE. 6.00'16
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
Soun:es
Par Amalm1 of Bonds 10,210,000.00
Acaued Interest 0.00
OlD 0.00
Total Sources 10,210,000.00
Uses
Deposit to Project AccoUD1 9,958.062.24
Acc:nIed Interest 0.00
Uoderwritcr'1 Discount 0.900% 91,890.00
Costs of IssulIru:e 110,000.00
Bonel InIllUllllCC 0.300% 50,041.76
Total Uses 10,210.000.00
Dates
Dated Date 1011193
DelivCl}' Date 1011193
First Interest Payment Date 211/94
True Intc:zest Cost 5.964345% To Proceeds of 10,068,062.24
AIbib'Bge Yield 5.844050% To Proceeds of 10.159,952.24
Adjul1mcnt to Interest Rau: Scale 0.596%
Target Annual Debt Service $897,750.00
Assumptions:
1) Costs of is5UllDCc is same as 1990 issue.
2) Insurance premium estimated at 30 basis points.
3) Underwriter's discount is $9 per $1,000 of par as rcquestecl by the City.
4) Coupms arc Delphis Hanover 96 from 6129/93 plus the adjustment rcquirccl tor a TIC of
approxiDwcly 6.00<l%.
5) New Ic:vel debt is added to outstanding declining debt to create overall declining
debt service.
Prepared by PFM Pagel
'.
CfrY OFDELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA DRAFT
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 1993 For Discussion
D~T SERVICE SCHEDULE Purposes Only
Annual
DlI1e Prindpal Coupon Interest Debt Senice Debt Service
811193 0.00 0.00
211194 335,000.00 3.246'10 187,310.53 522,310.53
8/1194 1:15.528.75 275,528.15 191,839.28
211195 345,000.00 3.946'10 275,528.75 620,528.75
8/1195 2611,721.90 268,721.90 889,250.65
211/96 360,000.00 4396% 2611,721.90 628,721.90
8/1/96 260,809.10 260,809.10 889,531.00
211197 375,000.00 4.646% 260,809.10 635,809.10
8/1197 252,097.85 252,097.85 887,906.95
211198 395,000.00 4.846% 252,097.85 647,097.85
8/1198 242,527 .00 242,527.00 889,624.85
211199 415,000.00 5.046'10 242,527 .00 657.527.00
811199 232,056.55 232,056.55 889,583.55
2/1f(X) 435,000.00 5.246% 232,05655 667,056.55
811f(X) 220,646.50 220,646.50 887,703.05
211101 455,000.00 5.346'10 220,646.50 675,646.50
811101 208,48435 208,48435 884,130.85
211102 480,000.00 5.446% 208,484.35 688,484.35
811102 195,413.95 195.413.95 883,898.30
211/00 505,000.00 5.546% 195,413.95 700,413.95
8/1/00 181.410.30 181,410.30 881,824.2.5
211104 535,000.00 5.646% 181.410.30 716,410.30
8/1104 166,307.25 166,307.2.5 882,117.55
211105 565,000.00 5.746'10 166,307.25 731,307.25
8/MlS 150,014.110 150,074.80 881,382.05
211106 600,000,00 5.846% 150,074.80 750,074.80
8/1106 132,536.80 132,536.80 882,611.60
211m 635,000.00 5.1196% 132,536.80 767,536.80
81l107 113,817.00 113,817.00 881,353.80
211108 670,000.00 5.946'10 113,817.00 783.817.00
11/1108 93,897.90 93.897.90 877,714.90
211100 710,000.00 5.996'10 93,897 .90 803.897.90
8/1100 72,612.10 72,612.10 876,510.00
211110 750,000.00 6.046% 72,612.10 822,612.10
811/10 49.939.60 49.939.60 872,551.70
2/1111 800,000.00 6.046'10 49,939.60 849,939.60
8/1111 25,755.60 25,755.60 875.695.20
211112 845.000.00 6.096% 25,755.60 870,755.60
8/1/12 0.00 0.00 870,755.60
2/1113 0.00 6.096% 0.00 0.00 0.00
10,210,000.00 6,472,585.13 16,682.585.13 16,682,585.13
Prepared by PFM PagCl2
'.
I DRAFT
CITY OF Dl!lllA YBEACH. FLORIDA For Discussion
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS. SERIES 1993 Purposes Only
COMP~ON OF OLD AND NEW DEBT SERVICE
OutstandJDg Series 1993 New Aggregate Annual Debt
Outstanding Annual Series 1993 Annual Total Service
Date DebtSemce Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service on Auaust 1
8/1/93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2/1/94 1,744,3S0.00 522,310.53 2,266,660.53
8/1/94 507,466.25 2,251,816.25 275.528.75 797,839.28 782,995.00 3,049,655.53
111/95 ,1,592,466.25 620,528.75 2,212,995.00
811195 479,257.50 2,071,713.75 268,121.90 889,250.65 747,979.40 2,960,974.40
211/96 '1,589,257.s0 628.721.90 2,217.979.40
8/1/96 449,217.50 2,038,475.00 260,809.10 889,531.00 710,026.60 2,928,006.00
111m 1,299,217.50 635,809.10 1,935,026.60
811fJ1 424,207.50 1,723,425.00 252,097.85 887,906.95 676,305.35 2,611,331.95
111198 : 1,324,207.5"0 647,097.85 1,971,305.35
811198 ; 397,623.75 1,721,831.25 242,527.00 889,624.85 640,150.75 2,611,456.10
111199 :I,297,613.7S 657,527.00 1,955,150.75
8/1199 370,313.75 1,667,947.50 132,0.56.5"5 889,583.55 602,380.30 2,557,531.05
2/1100 '1,325,323.75 667,056.S5 1,992,380.30
811100 341,061.25 1,666,385.00 220.646.5"0 887,703.OS 561,707.75 2,554,088.05
111/01 : 1,361,061.2.5 675.646.50 2,036.701.75
8/1/01 309,267.50 1,610,328.75 208,484.35 884,130.85 517,751.85 2,554,459.60
211m. 1,399,267.50 688,484.35 2,087,751.85
8flm 275,342.50 1,674,610.00 195,413.95 883,898.30 470,756.45 2,558,508.30
2/1/f13 ~ 1,290.342.50 100,413.95 1,990,756.45
8/1/f13 242,425.00 1,532,767.50 181,410.30 881,824.25 423,835.30 2,414,591.75
2/1/04 1,322,425.00 716,410.30 2,038.835.30
811104 207,160.00 1,529,585.00 166,307.25 882,717.55 373,467.25 2,412,302.55
2/1/05 ,1,367.160.00 131,307.2.5 2,098,467.2.5
811/05 : 169,165.00 1,536,325.00 150,074.80 881,382.0:S 319,239.80 2,417,707.05
2/1106 1,409,165.00 7S0,074.80 2,159,239.80
8/1106 lZ7,925.00 1,531,090.00 132,536.80 882,611.60 260,461.80 2,419,101.60
2/1/07 942,925.00 161,536.80 1,710,461.80
8/1/07 99,400.00 1,042,325.00 113,817.00 881,,353.80 213,217.00 1,923,678.80
2/1108 979,400.00 783,817.00 1,763,211.00
8/1108 68,600.00 1,048,000.00 93.897.90 877,714.90 162,497.90 1,925,714.90
2/1/f1J 1,013,600.00 803,897.90 1,817,497.90
8/1/f9 35,525.00 1,049,125.00 72,61210 876,510.00 108,137.10 1,925,635.00
2/1110 1,050,525.00 822,612.10 1,873,137.10
8/1110 0.00 1,050,525.00 49,939.60 872,551.10 49.939.60 1,923,076.70
2/1/11 0.00 849,939.60 849,939.60
811/11 0.00 0.00 25,755.60 875,695.20 25,755.60 875,695.20
2/1112 0.00 810,755.60 870,755.60
811/12 o.m 0.00 0.00 870,755.60 o.m 870,755.60
2/1/13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
26,812,285.00 26,812,285.00 16,682,585.13 16,682,585.13 43,494,870.13 43,494,870.13
Prep&red. by PFM pase 3
"
CITY OFDELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA DRAFT
GENERAL OBUGATION BONDS. SERIES 1993
WRAP AROUND DEBT SERVICE - 6.00'lI0 For Dlscussio:J
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS purpo~ O~~y
Saurc..
POl' Amaunt ofBaJds 10.209.o1ll.4O
Aa:rued l'merest 0.00
OlD 0.00
Total SOUReS 10.209,018.40
U_
DeposIt to ProJea Accollllt 9.951,669.74
Acaucd Jmaest 0.00
UDdmwlIllr'. Discount MOO.., 91.881.17
COlAS otIauanat 110.000.00
BOlld~ 0.300'1> 55,467.so
Tola! U.. 10.209.018.40
Daleo
Daled Dtio 10/M~3
Dellvery Data 101lM
First IrIIInst Pl:ymlll1t Date 211J'J4
T1118tn_CCBt 5.868478'1> To Ptoceads of 10,061.669.74
Arbllra&a YleId 5.1'12314'1> To Procaeds of 10,153.550.90
AdjuslmBllllD 1mmm Rate Scala 0.345'1>
T"'1let Annual Dabt Smvi<z $1.,jOO.ooo.OO
Aaumptluld:
1) CalIS at i.s:swmce is....." u 1990 iauc.
1) Wunmcz premium esIlmated at 30 ball; poIms.
3) Uoderwriw. di&:ount is $9 per $1.000 ofpu.. requested bylbe ClIy.
4) CoIIpOIIlIIU1> Delphia Hanover 96 from 6/1,9/93 plus the adJusanBllt required for a TIC of
lIppf'Oxlmately 6.000'1>.
S) New debt Is wrapped oround Ollts:anding decl1D.lng debt lD c:nl8llo overal1level
dAobt scrvi.c:c.
6) l'rim>ipal ill not to e;uzcd $10,2.12,000.
Prepared by PFM Plge 1
'.
ClTY OF DELRAY SEA.CD, FLORIDA DRAFT
GENEaAL ~BUGATION BONDS, SERIES 1993 For DIsCUSSIon
DEBTSERviCESCBEDULE Purposes Only
Amu"
Date Principal Coupon ....!!!!L ~ Proceeds Illterest Debt Sorm:.. Debt So""icc
8/1/93 0.00 0.00 0.00
2/]J94 0.00 1.995.. 2.99$'1> 100.000 0.00 166.673.78 166,673.78
8/]J94 2SO,o10.67 2SO,010.67 416.684.4$
2/119S 0.00 3.695... 3.6"'" 100.000 0.00 2$0.010.67 2SO,OlO.67
1/1J9S 250.010.67 2SO,OlO.67 SOO,02.1.34
2/1/96 0.00 4.143'-'0 4.143'-'0 100.000 0.00 2.SO,o1O.67 2$0,010.67
811196 2$0.010.67 2$0,010.67 500,021.34
211m 2SO,ooo.00 4.39j'itJ 4.3!r.l'-'o 100.000 2SO,ooo.00 :zj0,ol0.67 SOO,010.67
811m 244,5"16.92 244,$16.92 744,$27.59
2/1198 265,000.00 4.59~ 4.3!r.l'-'o 100.000 26S,ooo.OO 244,516.92 509,516.92
811f'1/J 238,428.54 238,428.54 747,945.46
2/1/99 330,000.00 4.795'-'0 4.7!r.l"" 100.000 330.000.00 238,428.$4 568,428.54-
811f99 130,516.79 230,516.79 798,94$$3
2/1/00 345,000,00 4.995... 4.99$'1> 100.000 34$,000.00 230,516,79 575,516.79
811/00 221.900.41 221,900.41 797,417.20
2/1~1l 3$5,000.00 5,095... 5.095'" 100.000 355.000.00 221.900.41 576,900.41
811101 212.1l56.78 212,11S6.78 789,751.19
2/1/01. 365,000.00 5.195'1. 5.195'1. 100.000 365.000.00 212,856.78 m,8$6.78
8/1/01. 21>3,,375.90 203,375.90 781,232.68
2/1/03 530.000.00 :I.29S'il. S.29S.. 100.000 530,000.00 21>3.;375.90 733,375.90
8/1/03 189,344.15 189,344.15 922.720.05
2/1/04 SSS,OOO.OO .5.395'il. .5,39S'll. 100.000 .555,000.00 189,344.15 744,344.15
8/~ 174.;373.02 174,,373.02 918,717.17
211105 575.000.00 SA95'1. 5.495'1. 100.000 57S,ooo.OO 174,,373.02 749.373.02
81WS 158,574.89 158,574.89 !I07,947.91
2/1/06 605,000,00 5.595'1> 5.:l95'1> 100.000 60:1.000.00 158,574.89 763,574.89
811/06 141.6SO.01 141.6:10.01 905,224.90
211m 1,145,000.00 5.645'1. 5.~"" 100,000 1,145,000.00 141,650.01 1,2.86,6so.o1
811m 109,332.38 109,332.38 1,395,982.39
2Il{f1& 1,200,000.00 5,695'1> 5.695"" 100.000 1,200,000.00 109.;332.38 1,309,g32.38
Sll{f1& 75,162.38 75.162.38 1,184,494.76
2/1{f1i} 1,270,000.00 5.745'1> S.743'h 100.000 1,210,000,00 75,162.38 1,345,162.38
811{f1i} 38,681.63 38.681.63 1,383,844.01
WIIO 1,335,000.00 5,795'1. 5.795'1. 100.000 1,335,000.00 38,681.63 1,373,681.63
811110 0.00 0.00 1,373,681.63
211/11 2,soo,OOO.00 o .IXlO'I> 6.300"" 34.124 853,100.00 0,00 2,500,000.00
8/1111 0.00 0.00 2,soo,ooo.00
2/1/12 720,000.00 O.lXlO'l> 6.300'1> n.un 230,918.40 0.00 720,000.00
8/1112 0.00 0,00 720,000.00
2/1113 0.00 0.0lIQII, 6.300" 30.143 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10.209,oI8.40 10).09,oJ8.40 6,144,165.40 18,489,16S.40 18.489,lGj.40
Prqnnd by I'fM Plat 2
"
CITY ~F DELRAY BEACD, FLORIDA DRAFT
GENERAL OBUGATJON BONDS, SERIES 1993
I
i For Discussion
COMPARISON OF OLD AND NEW DEBT SERVICE
OulstaadiDc Series 1993 New OIl5l.aadiDa ADDUal PUrposes Only
OuutndlDJ Auual Series 1993 AIlIlDaI TOIaI o.btSenice
~ Debt Semee Debt Semee Debt SerYl<< Debt Seniee Debt Service on Aupstl
8/1193 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
211~ 1,744,350,00 166,673.78 l,9l1,lW.78
811/94 :i<JT,466.2S 2,2:11,816.25 250.otO.67 416,684.45 7.57 ,476.92- 2,668,soo,10
211195 1..592.466.25 250,010.67 1,842,476.92-
811195 479:z5T .!j) 2,071,723.7.5 2.50,010.61 SOO,Q11.34 729,268.17 2,571,745.09
211/96 UI9:z5T,SQ 250,010.67 1,839,268.17
811J96 449,217 .!j) 2,038,475.00 250.010.67 SOO,P21.34 699.228.17 2,538,496.34
211197 1,299,217.!j) SOO,OI0.67 1,799,228.17
811f<.17 424,207..10 1,723,425,00 2.44,516.92- 744,.527.:59 668,724A2 2,467.952.59
21111J8 1,324,207 .!j) !l'O9,.516.92 1,8'33,724.42
811J98 397,623.15 1,721,831.:zj 238,428.54 747,945.46 636,ll.52.29 2,469.776.71
211199 1,297,623.75 568,428.54 1,866,052..29
811J99 310,323.7.5 1,667,947..10 230,516.79 198,94.5.33 600,84054 2,466,892.83
211100 1,325,323.75 575,516.79 1,900,840.54
811100 341,061.25 1,666,38.5.00 221,900.41 797/017 :ll) 562,961.66 2,463,1lO2.2O
2JWl 1,361,061.25 376,900.41 1,937,961.66
8/1101 309,267 .!j) 1,670,328.75 212,8.56.78 789,7$7,19 Si2,124.28 2,460.085.94
211/00 1,399,267.!j) S77 ,8:16.78 1,977,124.28
811/00 27.5,3423> 1.674,610.00 203,375.90 781,232.68 478,718.40 2,455,842.68
211103 1,290,342..50 733,375.90 2,1)23.718.40
811/03 242,425.00 1,532,767.so 189,344.15 922,720.05 431,769.1S 2,455,487..55
211104 1,322,425.00 744,344.15 2,066,769,15
811i04 207,160.00 1,529,585.00 174,373m. 918,717.17 381,533m. 2,448,302.17
211105 1,367,160.00 749,373m. 2.116,533.01
8/110.5 169,IM,oo 1..536,325.00 158,574.89 907,947.91 327,739.89 2,444,272.91
211106 1,409,165.00 763,5'14.89 2,172,739.89
811106 127 ,92S.oo 1..537 ,090.00 14I,6~.01 905,22.4.90 269,575.01 2,442,314.90
211107 942,925.00 1,286,650.01 2,229,575.01
811107 99,400.00 1,042,325.00 109,332.38 1,395.982.39 208,73238 2,438,307.39
211~ 979,400.00 1,jOO,332.38 2,2l!8,732.38
811,os 68,600.00 1,048,000,00 7',162.38 1,384,494.76 143,76238 2,431,494.76
211/09 1,013,600.00 1,345,162.38 2.,3S8,762.38
811fJ9 3S,5ZS.00 1,049,125.00 38,681.63 1,383,844,01 74,206.63 2,432,969.01
2I11lO I,OSO,:!2S.00 1,373,681.63 2,424,206.63
8I11lO 0.00 I,O:!O,:!2S.oo 0.00 1,373,681.63 0.00 1,424,206.63
211111 0,00 2,SOO,OOO.00 2,500,000.00
811111 0.00 0.00 0,00 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,SOO,ooo.00
211112 0.00 720,000.00 720,000.00
8{I112 0.00 0.00 0.00 720,000.00 0.00 720,000.00
211113 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
26,812,285.00 26,812,285.00 18.489.165,40 18,489,16.1.40 45,301,450.40 45,301.450.40
l'tqNnd by PFM Pltga 3
'.
,.
CIT)' OFDELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA DRAFT
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 1993 For Discussion
COMPARISON OF AGGREGATE DECLINING DEBT TO WRAP AROUND DEBT Purposes Only
Present V.tue
DeclInina Wrap Around Difference In PY Discount Difference in
Total Annual Total Annual Total Annual Factor at Total Annual
Debt Service Debt Sernce Debt Sen1ce 6.000'lfJ Debt SerYice
8M3 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.OOOOOOOO 0.00
1/1194 0.98048702
8/1194 3,049,655.53 2,668,500.70 381,154.83 0.95192915 362,832.40
1/1195 0.92420306
8/1195 2,960,974.40 2,571,745.09 389,229.31 0.89728452 349,249.44
'l/l196 0.87115002
8~196 2,928.006.00 2,538,496.34 389,509.66 0.84577612 329,438.20
1/1197 0.82114245
8/1197 2,611,331.95 2,467,952,59 143,379.36 0.79722568 114,305.71
211198 0.77400551
8/1198 2,611,456.10 2,469,776.71 141,679.39 0.75146166 106,466.6~
211199 0.72957443
8M9 2,557-,"31.05 2,466,892.83 90,638.22 0.70832469 64,201.29
2IlJOO 0.68769387
8/iJOO 2,554.088.05 2,463,802.20 90,285.85 0.66766:395 60,280.61
211/01 0.64821743
8/1m 2,554,459.60 2,460,08$.94 94,373.66 0.629337.31 59,392.87
2I~/02 0.61100710
8/1/02 2,558,508.30 2,455.842..68 102,665.62 0.59321077 60,902.35
1/1/03 0.57593279
8/1103 2,414,591.75 2,455,487.55 (40,895.80) 0.55915805 (22,867.22)
211/04 0,j421l'1189
8/1104 2,412,302S5 2,448,302.17 (35,999.62) 0.52706009 ( 18,973.96)
1/1105 0.51170882
8/1/05 2,417,707.05 2,444,272..91 (26,565.86) 0.49680468 (13,198.04)
2I1JQ6 0.48233464
8/1/06 2,419,701.60 2,442,314.90 (22,613.30) 0.46828606 (10,589.49)
2/1/07 0.45464666
8/1107 1,923,678.80 2,438,307.39 (514,628.59) 0.44140453 (227,159.39)
211108 0.42854808
8/1108 1,925,714.90 2,432,494.76 (506,779.86) 0.41606610 (210,853.92)
211109 0.40394767
8/1109 1,925,635.00 2,432,969.01 (507 ,334.01) 0.39218221 (198,967.37)
1/1110 0.38075942
8/l/10 1,923,076.70 2,424,206.63 (501,129.93) 0.36966934 (185,252.37)
2/1111 0.35890227
811/11 875,695.20 2,500,000.00 (1,624,304.80) 0.34844881 (5605,987.07)
211/12 0.33829982
811/12 870,755.60 720,000.00 1~O,7~5.60 0.32844642 49,515.14
2/1/13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31888002 0.00
43,494,870.13 45,301,450.40 (1,806,580.27) 102,735.78
Prepared by PFM Page 4
'.
~
CITY OFDELRA Y BEACH,FLORIDA DRAFT
GEm:RAL OBLIGATION BOllIDS, SERlFS 1993 For Discussion
COMPARISON OF NEW MONEY DECLINlNG DEBT TO WRAP AROUND DEBT Purposes Only
Present Value
I*lln1D& Wrap Around DUTerence In PV DIscount DilTeRIlce in
New MIIDey New MOlley New MOlley FKtor lit New Money
Debt service Debt Service Debt Service 6.000CJf. Debt Service
8/1193 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.OOOOOOOO 0.00
211194 0.98048702
8/1194 797,839.28 416,684.45 381.154.83 0.95192915 362,832.40
211195 0.92420306
8/1195 889,250.65 500,021.34 389,229.31 0.89728452 349,249.44
211196 0.87115002
8/1196 889,531.00 500,021.34 389,509.66 0.84577672 32.9,438.20
211197 0.82.114245
8/1197 887,906.95 744,527.59 143,379.36 0.79722568 114,305.71
211198 0.77400551
8/1198 889.624.85 747,945.46 141,679.39 0.75146166 106,466.63
211199 0.72957443
8/1199 889,583.55 798,945.33 90,638.22 0.70832469 64,201.29
211/00 0.68169387
8/1/00 887,703.05 797,417.20 90,285.85 0.(')6'166395 60,280.61
211/0 1 0.64821743
8/1/0 1 884,130.85 789,757.19 94,373.66 0.62933731 59,392.87
211/02 0.61100710
811/02 883,898.30 781,23268 102,665.62 0.59321077 60,90235
211103 0.57593279
8/1103 881,824.25 922,720.05 (40,895.80) 0.55915805 (~867.22)
211/04 0.54287189
8/1104 882,717.55 918,717.17 (35,999.62) 0.52706009 (18,973.96)
2/1105 0.5 1170882
8/1105 881,38205 907.947.91 (26,565.86) 0.49680468 (13.198.04)
2/1J06 0.48233464
8/1106 88:i,61UiO 905,224.90 (22,613.30) 0.46828606 (10,589.49)
211107 0.45464666
8/1107 881,353.80 1,395,982.39 (514,628.59) 0.44140453 (2Z1,159.39)
2/1108 0.42854808
811108 877.714.90 1,384,494.76 (506,779.86) 0.41606610 (210,853.92)
2/1109 0.40094761
8/1109 876,510.00 1,383,844.01 (507 ,334.01) 0.39118221 (198,967.37)
2/1110 0.38075942
811/10 812,551.70 1.373,681.63 (501.129.93) 0.36966934 (185,252.37)
211111 0.35890227
811111 815,695.20 2,500,000.00 (1,624,304.80) 0.34844881 (565,987.07)
2/1/12 0.33829982
8/1/12 870,755.60 720,000.00 150,755.60 0.32844642 49,515.14
2/1113 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31888002 0.00
16.682,585.13 18,489,165.40 (1,806,580.27) 102,735.78
Prepami by PFM Page 5
'.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER {!JA-1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i ~p/~ - SPECIAL MEETING OF AUGUST 3. 1993
FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 BUDGET AND PROPOSED MILLAGE RATE
DATE: July 3D, 1993
At the time the agenda was complete, staff was still preparing the
backup material for this item. The backup material will be forwarded
to you on Monday, August 2, 1993.
lA~ ~ /U1ft
~ oJt <6.d5 ~
r ;:y 93/9C/
$-0
..
.
- . .
[ITY DF DELIAY BEA[H
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 200 N\V 1st AVENUE' DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA 33444
FACSIMILE 407/273-4755 Wr~~_r'. D~r_c~ L~n_
(407) 243-7090
f}~tdcq~
MEMORANDUM tir ~ em ~ ~
Date: July 30, 1993 ~~Q& ~ ~~
To: City Commission ~ t' f;:-'- ~
From: David N. Tolces, Assistant City Attorne~ I'~~~/~:)
Subject: Approval of Road Construction Agreements with William
Swaim and Associates for Palm Trail and George Bush
Boulevard
The two agreements before you for your approval are between the
City and William Swaim & Associates ("Swaim"). Mr. Swaim is
planning on developing the project known as The Anchorage at
the north end of PalIn Trial north of George Bush Boulevard. As
part of the development, Mr. Swaim is planning on installing
improvements along George Bush Boulevard from U. S . 1 east to
the Intracoastal Waterway, and along Palm Trail north of George
Bush Boulevard to the entrance of The Anchorage Development.
As part of the agreement, the City agrees to waive any
application, permit, and inspection fees for the road improve-
ments and any off-site parking improvements. The road improve-
ments Swaim will install include drainage, paving, street
lights, landscaping, and appropriate signage. Under the
proposed agreement, Swaim will pay the cost of constructing the
road improvements, and the City will reimburse Swaim the lesser
of $215,000 for the improvements on Palm Trail or the total
cost of the road improvements. The City will also reimburse
Swaim the lesser of $285,000 or the cost of the road improve-
ments along George Bush Boulevard. The payments will begin one
year after completion of the road improvements. The annual
payments to Swaim will equal the amount of the ad valorem tax
increment attributable to the Swaim property.
Under the agreement, Swaim will have no obligation to perform
the road improvements until Swaim takes title to the property
for the Anchorage Development, and the final plat is approved.
An application for final plat approval is to be submitted
within six (6) months of the agreement's effective date.
SP / J-j
'.
.
City Commission
July 30, 1993
Page 2
The City will be responsible for relocating utility lines;
however, Swaim will pay the cost of relocating utility lines
underground. The City will be responsible for the cost of
installing drainage necessary to drain areas other than the
road improvements.
Under Paragraph 4(f), the City will notify Swaim of any work or
project which the City wishes to perform in conjunction with
the road improvements. Swaim agrees to provide the City with
notice 60 days prior to commencing the road improvements. This
60-day time period will allow the City to insure that any
additional work is performed in conjunction with the road
improvements.
There were discussions regarding the inclusion of a condition
for the City's performance under the agreement. It was our
office's suggestion that the City's performance be conditioned
on the adoption of the CRA' s amended plan for the northeast
neighborhood area. See attached letter from Kevin Eagan to
City Manager David Harden. The placement of this condition in
the agreement would provide the City with the assurance that
the CRA was committing itself to programs which the City would
otherwise perform. Without the condition in the agreement, the
City is committing itself to an expenditure of funds without
the assurance that other projects will be performed.
At this time, the Commission can approve the agreements as
written, or direct staff to continue negotiating the terms of
the agreement. Mr. Swaim has indicated his desire to have this
matter resolved as soon as possible, it is our intention to
continue to work with him in order to provide the City with an
agreement containing the necessary protections.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call.
DNT:sh
Attachments
cc: David Harden, City Manager
David Kovacs, Director of Planning and Zoning
Cheryl Leverett, Executive Assistant
swailll-4. dnt
.
,., .. Community (Y, ~Sk-'-10
.~ Redevelopment ~I J. Lt I q 3
-a Agency __ ~ ~>-L.V'J.-.
) ~ ~J M<"
Delray Beach I +'" )"Vl::r~.
February 25, 1993
Mr. Thomas E. Lynch, Mayor Mr. David T. Harden, aty Manager
City of Dclray Beach City of Deltay Beach
100 N.W. First Avenue 100 N.W. First Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444 Delray Beach, FL 33444
Re: Northeast Neighborhood Plan
Dear Mayor Lynch and Mr. Harden:
On February 11, 1993, the Community Redevelopment Agency of Delray Beach ("CRA")
discussed at length the area in the eRA district bounded by Gulfstrtam Boulevard, Seacrcst
Boulevard, the Intracoastal Waterway and the non-residential property on the south side of'
Northeast 8th Street, herein called "Northeast Neighborhood".
The CRA by consensus adopted the following strategy:
1. Consider a revision to the eRA Redevelopment plan for a Redevelopment Plal1 and
strategy for tbe Northeast Neighborhood. The plan would include neighborhood
participation~ both the residential and commercial interest. The plan will address at a
minjmu~ighborhood revitalization. street beautification, infrastructure needs. and a
Federal Highway commercial redevelopment strategy.
i. To the extent tax increment funds are generated by the project knOWl1 as the "Anchorage"
over the next several years, the eRA would intend to appropriate in its budget funds in
approximately the same amount as such tax increment funds generated by the Anchorage,
up to a maximum amount of $500,000.00, for infrastructure needs and street beautification
in the Northeast Neiihborhood as identified by the City and the CRA. This would be
implemented by 3D amendment to the C.ommunity Redevelopment Plan subject to the
approval of the City of Delray Beach.
3. One element of the Northeast Neighborhood Plan would include acquisition of the gas
station site on the: southeast corner of the interSection of Northeast 6th Avenue and
Northeast 8th Street. The property would ~ analyzed for its use :is a municipal parking
c ~ lot and/or redevelopment site.
4. Upon completion and adoption of the North~ast Neighborhood Plan (through formal
amendment to the Community Redevelopment Plan), we would ~x~ct to ~nter into a
form.al 3g.reement with the City, Sa.id agr~emtI'lt to address cost-sharing of appropriate
acquisitions <uld improvements.
207 E. Atlantic Avenue, Defray Beach, FL 33444 (407) 27648640 / Fax (407} 276-8558
"
'.
"f ,
.
Messrs. Thomas E. Lynch
and David T. Harden
Febnwy ZS. 1993
page 2
Our staff is CWTeDtly eDPied in revi.aing the CRA plan and will include the above mentioned
items in the plan. We expect to p~t th(: plan to the City within the next three (3) months.
We look forward to anoth~ successful ventuK betv.reen Lie City and the CRA.
c::c: ,Robert W. Federspiel
. Olristopher 1. Brown
KFJjj
~
.
-
'.
.
C~Vle\~~J i '" ',' .-'-1.
. ... l~.(-:V C ( C... I I
f;;d'~:J7/93 . l'J<.
\-,1 ;'
: "!
[ITY OF DElRAY BEA[H i~/
~1~~
CITY ,ATTORNE . >J ,,' L . [;ELRXY BEACH. FLORIDA 33444
,-"
-: ~' -.:. ...,..::;:; Wr~t_r.. D~r_ot L~n_
(407) 243-7090
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 21, 1993
To: City Commission
From: David N. Tolces, Assistant City Attorn~
Subject: Approval of Road Construction Agreements with William
Swaim and Associates for Palm Trail and N.E. 8th
Street
The two agreements before you for your approval are between the
City and William Swaim & Associates ("Swaim"). Ml:..:. Swaim is
planning on developing the project known as The Anchorage at
the north end of Palm Trial north of N.E. 8th Street. As part
of the development, Mr. Swaim is planning on installing
improvements along N.E. 8th Street from U. S. 1 east to the
Intracoastal Waterway, and along Palm Trail north of N.E. 8th
Street to the entrance of The Anchorage Development.
The road improvements Swaim will install include drainage,
paving, street lights, landscaping, and appropriate signage.
Under the proposed agreement, Swaim will pay the cost of
constructing the road improvements, and the City will reimburse
Swaim the lesser of $215,000 for the improvements on Palm Trail
or the total cost of the road improvements. The City will also
reimburse Swaim the lesser of $285,000 or the cost of the road
improvements along N.E. 8th Street. The payments will begin
one year after completion of the road improvements. The annual
payments to Swaim will equal the amount of the ad valorem tax
increment attributable to the Swaim property plus 5% interest.
Under the agreement, Swaim will have no obligation to perform
the road improvements until Swaim takes title to the property
for the Anchorage Development, and the final plat is approved.
An application for final plat approval is to be submitted
within six ( 6) months of the agreement's effective date.
The City will be responsible for relocating utility lines;
however, Swaim will pay the cost of relocating utility lines
underground. The City will be responsible for the cost of
9C
'.
.
,
City Commission
July 21, 1993
Page 2
installing drainage necessary to drain areas other than the
road improvements.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call.
DNT:sh
Attachments
.
cc: David Harden, City Manager
David Kovacs, Director of Planning and Zoning
Cheryl Leverett, Executive Assistant
Bwaim-4.dnt
--
'.
'\'\ \\ ~
""( \
/'
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
FROM: Q~:c1o~~
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 26, 1993
SUBJECT: CITY COMMISSION ACTION ITEM - ROAD AGREEMENTS FOR
PALM TRAIL AND GEORGE BUSH BOULEVARD
The following information should be considered concurrently
with the agenda item on July 27th wherein the City
Commission is asked to approve submitted Road Construction
Agreements.
In my opinion, the agreements are neither ready nor adequate
for approval at this time. My opinion is based upon the
following:
1. While the CRA has expressed an intent to provide TIF
increments in an annual allocation equal to City expenses
under the proposed road construction agreements, such an
agreement (between the City and the CRA) has not been
drafted. Previous discussions intended for concurrent
actions (agreement with Swaim and agreement with the CRA) by
the City Commission.
2. Both agreements refer to a schematic roadway design
shown in Exhibit "C". In both instances there are
significant changes to the cross-sections in certain reaches
of the roadways. These changes are detailed in the Planning
and Zoning Board staff reports and memoranda to the City
Engineer. The P&Z materials and the memoranda would be more
appropriate exhibits - particularly in light of Section
11(b), discussed later.
3. In addition to the roadway improvements, there are to be
improvements to private property - mainly to compensate
adjacent property owners for the loss of parking. The
requirement to provide this replacement parking and identify
it as a project cost should be in the agreement. Also,
provisions should be made for obtaining private owner
consents, processing of the related site plans, and
provision of normal financial guarantees.
..
To: David T. Harden
Re: city Commission Action Item - road Agreement for Palm
Trail and George Bush Boulevard
Page 2
4. Section 4(a) provides that, in addition, to the annual
TIF payment, the City shall pay interest. This interest
payment would come from the City' s General Fund. In FY
94/95 the interest payment for Palm Trail will be $10,750
and the interest payment for George Bush Boulevard will be
$14,250. This $25,000 expenditure has v heretofore been
unanticipated. ~~~
5. Section 11(b) relates that the Agreement sets forth all
understandings and supersedes all prior understandings, etc.
The lack of specific reference to the Planning and Zoning
Board actions and affixing related documents as exhibits
creates a situation wherein those actions become void in
light of these Agreements.
Other aspects of the proposed agreements which are of
question include the following:
A. The first WHEREAS states that Swaim is the contract
vendee of certain real property described in Exhibit "A".
Mr. Swaim has not provided documentation that indeed this
statement is factual. Such information has been requested
with respect to his preliminary plat submission and it has
not been provided.
B. The fourth WHEREAS refers to "said" tax increments
wherein this is the first reference to the term.
Apparently, this WHEREAS clause is left-over from previous
drafts. More appropriate wording should be provided.
C. Section 2(b) requires approval, by the City, of Plans
and Specifications within twenty days of submission. There
is no allowance for rejection of the submission, required
modifications, etc. Such time certain wording has
previously provided problems in the processing of the site
development plans for the Donnelly Tract. Also, this
Section does not mention the submission and review of site
plans for private property parking lot modifications which
are necessary to accommodate the proposed street
modifications.
D. Section 2(b) provides for a waiver of fees for
construction of the Road Improvements. Clarification should
be provided as to whether this waiver also applies to the
four to six private property (parking lot) site plans which
are to be processed concurrently.
E. Street lighting is identified [Section 4(a)] as a
project cost. There have been no details provided as to the
lighting fixture which is to be used. There has been
discussion that gas lights will be used along Palm Trail.
.,
To: David T. Harden
Re: City Commission Action Item - road Agreement for Palm
Trail and George Bush Boulevard
Page 3
There has also been discussion that the maintenance
responsibility for gas lights should not rest with the City,
but with The Anchorage Homeowners Association. If there is
no resolution of this matter, at this time, it is
appropriate to delete "street lights" from the proposed
agreements.
F. Section 4(a) provides that "Swaim shall notify the City
in writing of the total cost of constructing the Road
Improvements". There is no provision for Swaim to provide
proof of costs of construction. In reimbursement situations,
documentation of costs is normal.
G. In neither agreement is there a Section 5.
H. In the Palm Trail agreement, Section 4(d) states that
Swaim will provide 200 Royal Palm trees. Mr. Swaim has been
adamant that Oaks will be provided along Palm Trail and the
Royal Palms along George Bush Boulevard. Verification that
Royal Palms will be used along both roadways should be
obtained.
r. Section 4(e) has an intent to require due diligence on
behalf of Swaim to proceed with the project in a timely
manner. However, the performance measure is only that of
submittal of a final plat. There is no requirement that the
submission be adequate for acceptance e.g. in full
compliance with any approved preliminary plat and its
conditions, nor the attendant private property (parking lot)
site plans. It is better to not have a performance
requirement, rather than one which is subject to multiple
interpretations.
J. The hold harmless provisions of these agreements should
also apply to loss of parking, loss of business during
construction, and any claims which may be brought by
adjacent property owners who are affected by the
improvements.
DJK/leh
c: David Tolces, Assistant City Attorney
Alison Harty, City Clerk
Ralph Hayden, City Engineer
Steve Taylor, Project Planner
project Files
DJX/ROADCMTS. DOC
'.
[IT' DF DELRA' BEA[H
100 N,W, 1st AVENUE . DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 . 407/243,7000
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
FROM: v#obert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: BID AWARD FURNITURE PURCHASE FIRE STATION HEADQUARTERS
DATE: August 3, 1993
ACTION
City Commission is requested to approve an award with Command
Office Equipment, Inc. in the amount of $30,579.16 for office
furniture for Fire Headquarters station. Funding to come from
account #227-2311-522.61-56 Decade of Excellence Bond
Anticipation Note.
Purchase is under Broward County Sheriff's Office Bid
#9l-0520-64 and Palm Beach County School Board Bid #SB-93c-81L.
We were just informed today that the price for the furniture
would increase by 5% if the order is not placed by 8/4/93.
RAB:kwg
{)(j ~/~~
j2LL
THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS
'.
.
[ITY DF DELRAY BEA[H
FIRE DEPARTMENT
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Ff.' ~' DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
<jD~~ KERRY B. KOEN, FIRE CHIEF Of\~
[!:w!
DATE: AUGUST 2, 1993
SUBJECT: WORK STATION AND FURNITURE PURCHASES
FIRE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS
We have obtained quotations from two firms which currently
have county contracts for office furniture. We recommend
acquisition of the following equipment from Command Office
Equipment, Inc. who is the low bidder of the two firms. with
your approval noted, we can immediately take this recommendation
to our Purchasing Division who will then "Fast Track" the
purchase.
Fire Safety Division: Four (4) Work stations for Fire
Inspectors including computer pull-out drawers, overhead
cabinets, dividers, four (4) side chairs, four (4) desk
chairs, six (6) dividers and related installation,
$9,336.98
Fire Safety Division: One (1) conference table with eight
(8) chairs, one (1) work table with four (4) chairs, four
(4) desk chairs, four (4) side chairs, and eight (8)
lateral file cabinets,
$5,780.30
Battalion Chief's Office: Three (3 ) Work stations for
Battalion Chiefs, with overhead cabinetry and computer
pull-out drawers, three (3 ) desk chairs, one (1) round work
table and four (4) side chairs, associated dividers and
related installation,
$8,464.78
i:~H[-: DE:~'/\iii,',~'c"J! HE:/'\[)QUt~HTERS.' 101 WE:S! i'\T l.J"NTIC J'\ VENUE. Dr.: LRA Y BEACH, F LOR IDA 33444
'Jr'!) ')i1"~_);'jrln ~ ~:-!\ '1l1n7/ ?G:G_llhhn
'.
,
Page - 2 -
Memorandum - Mr. Harden
Headquarters Purchases
Administrative Areas/Larqe Traininq Room: Twenty ( 20)
folding tables, seventy-five (75) stack chairs, two (2)
conference tables, fourteen (14) chairs for conference
rooms and six (6) side chairs for various offices,
$6,997.10
The total price for all the requested fixtures and
furnishings is ~_~0,579.16 and the funding source is the IIDecade
of Excellencell Bond Issue (Fire station No. 1) . These funds
have already been allocated and appropriated for this and
related purchases.
Your concurrence would be appreciated.
\t~ \S,lL-
Kerry B. Koen ~
Fire Chief
KBKjmrnh
cc: Div. Chief Cato
Asst. Chief Wigderson
,.
'.
.
#
::l e
::l!: a: W en Q. a:
~ a: 0 > ~ fu::J 0
en W 0 ~ 0 ~ W
Q. ~ W ~ en c
5 >- S 2 8 ~ ,S ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi-'
W z, , _' I r-- ' .... .. e~
Z :J ',...:;. 0 0 C'\ . C' D 1 'i'-. ~I" ~- ~..... ~ I, {"o, a:0
~ , ~ 2{ ~ C'\ 10, e;;; ~[~~~" ~. \(' I~r-- \' '31~ Or- ~
~ <~~~~I~, .~~~ ~\~ rr
::l!: _~~~I~, , ~
~ w~68~~~~€~81~~~i~ ~
i ~ ~1~~~~1~~~1~~1~'::::~11'~~ ffi~
~.'~~~~~~~~'~~ I~~~~ O~O
~~ ~ rr
,S ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0
~ ;; ~ sGr~,~ .~ LL ~
~ """ ~ -"'.~I~ '-.) ~"" l~;;1 0 w
~ ~ ~ ~~..~.<> \""".~'~~ ~!? I- rr
i5 -..: ""<,. \[ ~ W Z
en ~ V .~ \r-I~~v :~ ~ W ~
~ c:, ~:~ ~ <;:;:,., ~ ~ V ~R ~ ~ ~ r-: ~ ~
i= S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '- 1;:: Q ~ 0 ~ ~
~~ }~J~ ~:H ~ ~I~ ~ ~ 1:' ~ ~ :s 0
m . ~~"(, 'l.. '2 ~ ~:::: N' ~ ~ ~~ c a: 11. l-
e I~ ~~ (~~) * OzG
g ~ !.~\t Q ?f. ....S) fY .CJ '~~I~ ~~ ~ ~ 00 W
Q. - !~~fV'\(XI('\ro.'Ui\\'I' '" ..".....~--.;;:.~ I-: (/)Q..-:l
~ Ixr>< 'I i " UI~ XX: >< XI>< ~~ "-- ~ ~ -:> CO
Cl-- '><J ><: \}. <1 "::i-, ::J-, >S} "- "" , ~I:it a: 0 :J
. ,c~~~I~I~ ~<(j\'1l~V ~\'-fVf 00 ~~ ~
"- ::l!: rr-rr
~ ~ O:>~
o Z 0
Q. 0 rr (/)
~ ~ :>WO
- 0 Orr
v ~ W 0
<J ~ t.J... ;;1 >- (/) 0
~ c ~ Q c: ~ d';j,-.,Sj C (),'" () 0'- 00 w ~ (')
~! ~ M M ~ ~ '~~ <n '6 enl;?;t f'('i~ l'(' ~ ?;-J) ~ ~ ~ @
~@~n ~ - ~1~";:;I~?ilNC1i;;t;~I~~('()~~ Ulu.Z
w < < v C\J 0 -....:::::; ~ , \)r-<\ ' \J "<.l ....... a -....... -......... ........ ~ 0 rr
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - & i&-f>!' 1Cl'- 0'- \'fl;., (y'~ ~ ~ 0 ell c: w I- 2
o ;l; ir ~ ~ - J". Y. 0()~I~ v ~ .1.)(; ~I \.X:: (/) (/) W
~ 0 rr
C wQ..~
~ ~w~
Z ~ Q..O~
<C "- , >
~ ~ ~
~' :::>
o 0 l-
ll::: ~. ~ () ;2
.:::: (/) - en (5
fiJ ~ ...J If)
O a: N 0 en a:
o --- ...J W
o <{> w ::;:
o < u c ~ 1,,{:::f-I~;j<~i--I--3:;}i::N*- ~ *1* ___ ft- <:xl ~
"Oo:owo: 6_ 0 i-
"
-
I r---
o ~ .. I
a: a: w
l/l 15 0 >- l/l l/l ~ C
0.. 9 w ::J fh:::J a:
u. irl ~ I- w 0
X l/l a
~ f- IA
~ !< \3 8 ~~g2IE E8~ f!~ g~-
~ ~~I~I~~~~I~I~~~~I~g(1 ig
~ ('(.1 ~;-:.. -.:'ll~ ~ ~I':::::I~ ~ ___ ",Ie,;: ,y 0"" W
a m I ~ ,~.....Io<: i">-. ~ CJ
~ ~ ~~e8~~~€~~ '1 <~ ~
g: ~ 1:S1\i. _~~ ~[00~1~' ~ ~ ~ )( 0
Ice ~ ___ ::::fs\ !c) ~ ~ i! . (9
~ tr-. 11'.. ~ 0: Z
....1 <( W -
~... "":::: \ < l/l 0 ~
1,'1- ~il F-- j \r) ,~ - 0: 0
~ I~ ~, I~ 00
~ \; '" ~ i I"'i' " I"" LL tJ
L ,~~ i ~ ~ ~~ if) ~ g 0 ill
15 ~ '-=1 \ ~\3 ~~ ~ ,c, Iii ~((
~ ~ ~~ ~~ -i -<l~~ ~ ~ ~ :..- . ~ ~
~ ~~ ~ ~; sJN~~~ +~ ~~~
,,~ . 0 ~ ~M"" ",'~ ~ ,~'--. ~:5 0
~ ~ ~_ ~I~ "10 'q~ ";'1(' ~. ~ ~ 0- ~
,Jf:~ -'lI'~~ ~I~~ ~ 060
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ <~ --...::: ~ (j) 0... ~
("'~" ~ j\-- '.::'\ \:'- ."i 1 ~ 2i a ((:J en
" C"I>l '- ~ "V" '.( ~ W 0 ~
~ l/l OW
fh ~ ::,; ccccW
a a: -0:
<5 g - i ~ O:J<(
z ~ "Z 0
-c~ ~ Q CC (j)
I- ..J I- W
z"'~ " ~ 0
wO a ~o:
:>"'r I 0",," woo
!l; ili ~ ~ ~ w i 'J' --> ~ () ,'t \..\. (I ~ >- Ul 0
oow~~ " w-..O .J'~. , r-:-~ -
w !1i : .." " 0 t: -../ rI. v' cY\- '-L V\ w" CJ
~ " '" ;\ ~ J 0 --r-' U C 10-' '>; (( 0
;;: :;!!l ., S ~ ----::::: .,In _. I~ "^ :J 0 0
i'; ;\ H ~ 0 rfllY'! ,,1'-.) '" I '2~ 1\0 Ul ~ ~
~,(XtxJ CXI~ ~ ~ t" ~ ~ 0 0:
C ~R____.....~:J
W - r-
Z ~ UlO(j)W
.., I- q: ((
_ Z wO-~
~ > ~W~
..,::; O-Oq:
~ ~ C
O ~ <.> () UJ
w a: en a:
~ N (5 ...J 2
O a (;,...J en <(
<( u ~ '- Q
if)
z~ a:
~~~ I W
_ 0 IT: 0 W IT: g 5 ,^-O'C "'- 1eJ..:J. ::t- * ~
if)
::>
u
" ---'
, .
._,~.,-------'_. .__ __ __ ___...____. ...... . ___,____ - ..... __. __'__ ,__ .____ _._. _hu___. '__',
,_,_,~,___,,,,,,,___,~_--:____~___,______,__'n__~'__ _ _. ____~___ ___ -_~___. _ _ _ . __ _ ___ __ _ 1 _ ___________.__ --- - -- __'_.___4__".'__.__
). 'T-: /Q~ :
/ ~ . ,
.--" . D .,--. - ,-. '
, .
---"---,----"-,.-,----'-,---"---..,-. .: .7J" '
'd . . ~o O---'-~~!J{7i1::1J;.7f&~Jir0
_: __ .3 ';' '_u \ '\ ' _ _ , ; '1_- t-r!ri/K 5't-u.aC-1 tl'lY 3~ .
_,"-__:_ ._--J))-T""---'-.. --- - "~..... .jd__ - -- .... -...- .---- ..~,I _<<-_,~' 3.~X. lfL. rYl~ (}~.(tL<'Ic/&4/1.,4
'--:-h.,.:d' .- ~-, -.i~--. V.. tLf: f{/;!!/t, .~.~0~(f
'v' ,,-- ' .-1~---.~t '., jrb( .;{
___ . ;__,J~_._fltlps.stf?J1JJec./J( levf
_, _,_._,_ ____,._ ___._,.__.___J- _~,6?/l/.l~c/o!'yZt:__._~. .
. .. f~~'I(,OM~.ht
! ~~ i "f--- ..., .~'I/eVt/ J/el-
:! ,. (f~ . f1qj'.6/tif '
----Ta:..,- .--~-- 0--....- .;"~:-~~i~(~A:
. '~ ;. ~ I . ,F- -r:-i.(/( (q'I;.
. 1 .. Ii:... · . 'f~ Sbt.5J~CII4(r ,okAJ
-------:--0 0:--- --------~~Ll.~~;jj'~~;~:~
" .. . - ..... .1 :JVI/!d,je ){tl41c./
'.~.i "., -,' i.' - ; , ". __1/.. ,,&;.%4x hi, ;{htl:(
,-'-----~f---..---..-- --,~ - u,.. ,n'__ - ..'-----'----.,.--- -_.---~ -2:2-:.~L&;.Q.q,,[t,.(_P/{~{r-- --
, .. I
! ;:P ! .
____.~__ ._______._~_ _,_~__~._ - - _.__._ - - ~_ ._..___. - ~ - - _0- _ __ _ _ . _ ___ _ _ _ ___ __ _______ ___ ~ _~ __ __ ~ _ _ _ _ _ ..._._ _0_
__'___~___________________. ___' ___~._ ____o___~_____________________________~______~. __ _ _ _ _ __.
.
_~__..________.____.__._ ______..____ .___......;..__ _ .. ._ _. _ __. ._ ._.. _ 0 n _._._ __ _ ._____.._____'" __._,._____.~_~___.__ _________~____ ___. _____ .____ _______~___
,.
.,
'.
w
w "'-'
> , w~
w 0 Cl~
~ x ",0 W
Qt-'- (9
a:
<:t::
I
o
x .(9
;! a:Z
en W _
~ 0 ~
~ a: 0
08
u.(/)
-' Ow
g r-a:
:;; Z ~
en W 0
~ ~ 0
~ W I.{)
00 <:t::
W<:t:: 0
a: ....J r-
a: 0.. r-
~ Oz 0
~ 00 W
W (/) 0.. J
~ -::) co
Cl a:o:J
Ww(/)
o a: W
a:-a:
0::) <:t::
a: 0 (/)
:J W 0
o a: 0
>- (f) 0
W~(9
a: <:, 0
:J l[) W
. ~ UJu.z
!;1 " woC[
~~~ all-:J
wOo W-r-
"OCX~~ (jJ W
"Z~::J::J UJo a:
~~w~~ ~
Oa:lIlCON wo.. I
W<<<N ~
w"ocoo~ -'W-'
"o"'iOo no <:t::
~<>oo ~
u'o:t-o:tro
O<oa:~_
C
Z
<(
:E
:E
o
(.) 0
.OCLOWCL 6,
-
#
::; a: UJ 00 ::;) 0
<..l 00 0- 0:
a: a: 0 > ::;) 0- :J 0
00 w 0 UJ UJ
0- ....J ....J 0 I- W
U. UJ :x: 00 0
:x: 6 8 ~ I~
00 e 0 2 8 8 g -
<l: () (:J 8 8
u <0
t- <:) <0 O:-J
UJ Z ~~
z .
0 => ~ ... (;) 8
z 0 ,~ -: 'bO ~ 8 (\ 0 IV) + - 0:0
~ ~ .-SJ It ~ ~ OF- W
....J CX::l ri L9 (Y) &J 6
< < ('(l ('(J \P rn - (9
::; .......... <Y) -9 ..- '" a:
............ ~ ,.,...... ---
z 8 € g -t B 8 IE ~ <t:
a.. 0 g g B f I
....J 2
00 G 0
Q w
I- W u -::f -+ ~. . ~ x
00 a.. a: t' 0'" -- 00 ~ 0 ~ t>O r- ~ "(9
::l ~ --9 -J - 0
<..l I- a. \.J'- --- ~ ?6 .-S) F6 ::t- oo a:z
CO ~ - (Y) r() w w-
r<) - ....J
<l: o~
00
-... , ~ a:o
~ K :s: ~ -
'" ~ 00
:~ ~ ~ LLI-
I <:::: ::J~ ~
" ~ - ocr;
~ I\:) -c '-'1 ....J
00 - :g ~ \ ~ ~
::l ? w
~ ~ 0 ~ -l ,i ~ I-a:
00 -;:::J ~ h~ ,;j UJ Z
<<::::::... ~ ~ 00 w'(f?
3- "'" 0
z ~ "'" "'" <::> < 1 ... ::;
0 <:::: -~ -:J~ .~ ~ ~ ,e:;: ~ - ~ "~ .~ 0
} ~ - I- W l!)
~ ;;... ..1 ;
-
a. ~ 3 c9 1 1; Oo<t:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~' j W<t:o
~ ~
en < K~ ~ [; , a: ...J I-
w r1
0 I~ ~ r6 ~ k>o ~ -5} ~ .......... ~ 0 a: 0..
<6 \)0 f:<t( ~ --.: UJ o Z I-
00 -j-- Z
<..l ~ fY) ~ 'j- (Y\ :+ :: 1(1 N Cl 00 @
<l: - in
)( >< .;;: 1"<
X >< >< 1><- UJ
Ix '>( 1>< "" .; v ~ ti UJ 0.. J
:J- ~ 0 -:Ja:l
C'() l'() cY) 0- (J ro 8- -d-- ;"t s: <>~ ~ a:O:J
-J--- '=i- * -3 -9 i- ce; ~ ~ V1 ..( <)' WW(j)
W-
I.\: UJli 00 o a: W
I- ::; a:-a:
in a:
UJ O:J <t:
0 I-
a.. Z a: 0 (j)
UJ 0
0
i= :J W 0
a..
v 0 o a: 0
d CI ci LL UJ
v l-Sf DO LL
Z C") ....J >- (j) 0
- C") 8 <l:
1-0....1 ~ 00
Z<(u. Q ~ ,~ l!)O -j- 1('(\ 'j- \6 00 W ~ (9
w 0 _ ~ ...3 IcE
:!;e::x: -:j- :t- '::t- -;:}- j- :::r :t N\ a: (;, 0
e:zu~g UJ w It rCl I~ -::t- (Y\
::lW~<D<o ti t: (J ~ ~ :J l!) W
a N') ~ (Q \6 'j- ~
oOm't'f a ('(\ ~ -.9 CO 0 Q UJu.z
we: a:lC\J
w<(<(VC\J a: ~ i- I~ Ir-
0 ier r W 0 a:
uCle:a:lC") ~ 0- r0 \'0 N\ ....!)
u:o!!!;:::-o- g; -9 o- m I- :J
u.~>oo g:; g;; y 1)0 c,.a
O<Da:~~ ()O ;y..:. Va ()O W - I-
UJU)W
C <{Oa:
0- w 0.. ...J
Z t- ...J W .....J
z a. 0 <t:
< ~ >
~ UJ
0 a:
~ Cl. 0 ::;)
u () ~
(f) (/) z
(f) a: -1 <.:J
0 UJ 0 Ui
a: N (/)
a U, ...J a:
0 0 u w w
<:{ 0 :;
~Pt-- r+ ~ 0
'z{' Lf) ~ I-
I~ [, a 0/ - - - 1\'\ ,'< if)
---.. ---... ::;)
J U
~O cr 0 w cr Q 0
0
,
-
-
#
:;) 0
o ::;: a: ~ (f) Q. a:
a: a: 0 > :;) fu::J 0
(f) W 0 ~ 0 r W
Q. i w ~ (f) C
5 ~ ~8S3g~g~88~g~ ~
w Z . . O~
~ ~ :::: ~ l'>o -::I-- ['-- -:l- ro ~ 'i- ;:? ('( ~ :5~ w
~ <~c~ ~~~~)~~~~ ~
::;: -- ~
c ~ w g8EgE~g~8~~f! " 6
- o("{" - h--f' <I: .(!j
lii ~ a: ~ ~ {'- 00 c- \'.1- c- -:;- OIV r/. l;; a: z
iJ " 0. ,,';' co ('II '" q; ~ \' 'Q ;;f ~ 'u ~ W ~
~) (f) 00
~~"., , 1 ~ ~ ~
\9~ ~(~ 9K ~ ;t ~ ~
~ 9:' t\r <:P~..J ""( ~ ~..... (I
~ -~ ~.~ ,I~ ~ 1':1 <;;: I ~ ill ';](
.~'-.:S <!. ~ < c:, ~'SL!"f:>, ::;: 0
~~C~..., .~ ~ -~~LO
~) Ii: . ~ ~ 4 1; J':3 ;;. ~ < , < 0 0 <(
\ ~ ~I~ .~ <:- ~ ,G ~ C:oo ~. ~ ~ ~:s ~
.. w ~ VIi -\- ~ cl.q.,I-;t~ ~ "(! <1 @ ~ CL f-
~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ --: ,'i;3 0."$ :p~ G', 4< G ~ 0 6 @
- ~ - "'-; C -<T: eX ~ C/)Q..~
~ -:~,-.,(, "" (:u C - (l)
I ~ ( k~ or~ ~ <::., - '~~ f.. - (I:J:J
~ 0 cn:I'~ ~I &t q)1~.r( C_c LL ~ (f) ~ @ ~
l/J) '/1 ' /; \ ~ (I a: (I
~ ~ O:J~
~ ~ (IOW
~- Ii' ::J~O
~ h- - -..1 ~ 0 0
g * ~ (jIO .(J~ -~ eJ I+() ~ >- CI) 0
;:o~ ~ 9 <: r.=s;o 9 r{ e:rtr{-...9 w~ (!j
ili Cl "c. :; i::I- IX> -' -" ro -'" , U -' 0 j- a: ;:, 0
il'~i3::l~ ~ ~ Oo,-,_!~ --- _ ::JlOw
~ ~ ~ ::: ~ ~ - g <b 0 g C () G 9 C ('0('(\ 0 ~ LL ~
g ~ ~ ~ ~ c - ,--s ..."J 00 po ()O DC 00 ()C (jJ tfl1>Q ()O lD 2 :J
u.~>oo w-1-
~-~oo C/)
O<Da:~~ W W
~O(I
C wQ..~
~ ~w~
Z ~ Q..O~
<( >
:2: c 0 ~
~ ~ 5 <.) =l
.::: 0.... (f) _(/) g
w U CJ) ~ -l <.f'j
O ffiw ~ ~ NO. (/) a:
0:;: z 0 - ...J W
a:<>: 0 0 <{l w :;:
o Oz U <I: U 0 Z J.. 1- ...r:r--Jl~ 2
:3 0" -:::f- J <.f' - <i -..'01-1 .-J 'l:r' v~ \J' 3
~Oo:owo: ~ 0' _
'.
.
"-
-
I I'"'-"
~ ::E II: UJ #
(/) ffi 0 > (/) (/) ~ C
Q. g ~ ::l fu::J a:
~ u. UJ ~ lii ~ 0 ...L
<l - .-
~ ~oQg3~ 0 C~ -
z 5 <() 0 ~ " J: ~ ~ It) C' -
~ 0 ~~,~~ ~. - a:
<( :i: CX1 (.~ 'J""' ..r .,.-.. ..r "'~ 8 :j- w~
::E <( -J- r\ -.9 .......... (\ '-.::9 C~
~ " 6()['- Cl i- 1- 3j ()O :f- l51? w
" ~ _~" r-- ()o - CJ
~ w GO I 000 II
1) ~ ~~151 liJ -9>>0"" t <c
g: .s r' Ui c-.:: ci- -of .' f I
_~_~ ~~~ ~ ~ U
--.....1 " \'().::::.:::: OJ:' lil a: (!)
+ I~ ~ "WZ
.~ 1\ l..::l '- cd;':; 0 ~
~ lfl (d~ d - a: 0
(/) ~. ~ _~ ~ 00
~ ~ . 'j'" J LL l-
lL ~ '<. ~<f\ ~ oU?
c - <t ~ I-W
.rl 15 0 4- .i; ~. m z II
II V Ii: '" -;, = I- ~ w ;f-
a: (j 0 Q 0 -' ~ 0
fA :'! ~ c... twill
" w -I = II W 0 4::
. a~~' r <Co
~ ~ ~'~ ~ II~
~ "-- _ " IIn f--
~ UJ LJ...
~ -l\.Q ~ 0 z t
'" ~ \lL ~ 0 0
c: ~ _ ~ Uln W
I~ _ 0 LJ...J
~ ~ _ a:~ro
c ~ ~ wo~
~ (/) OW
fu ::E a:a:W
~" ~ -"
u ,,- ~ O::J~
" M ~ Z 04::
_OM 0 ~ _ rl Q II (j)
ffiClu' ~ V .(~ .',< t ::JW 0
" " or a ~ --.L oor- "a:
~ZOM - U J w 0
~~~~~ ~ B5 C~ clJ ~ >-Ul8
W~m"N <l ~ u ~ w-
W <:l <( ~ N 0 - - 0 X ,0 (!)
<..> a: ('") II: a: 0......
u:o!!:!;;:-- 0 m 00
u.~>oO
o;;\O':;.@. - t- < ~IllW
(Y}ltyJ 1-- W ~ ~
C . ro ::J
wI-I-
Z ~ UlUlw
~ ~ <cOlI
z wOo
~ > ~wj
~ > ll.O<c
m 0
o a. C
O ~ tJ ~ u U
WW ~ W . Ul ~
0::;: z ~ N 0 ....J :::>
" g~ " " 0" Ul ~
~ u ~ u w Z
o 0
Z if,
· 0 IT 0 W IT @ ~ N)..9 --... ~
UJ
:::>
u
-oJ
.
!
,
, ,
, , ;
: "
i i
!
, . ;
i
!
!
,)(: l,\''b, I
rr -t-i I
;
. .x 1
I
: i
,
!
i 3-
r:' !
, i
!
,
~ !
~ )
, :~
I j j
- - ~
I
~
1\
i"3-
~
Ss \?
<) 0
(-'5 X'
I -S {' ^-'\-{,
c.. ~i, -ci7 .X'
!
~1~ jl'(7)'">rS-021
51;4 :3 (,I 'r.J "'?i ")} Ci) 01 1\ Ii CJ 1.1"Y) '>'2.' '\j SI ~'\~ ti d
S' -l H CJ 1-1 '-;>1 'S"-} .L
,. 51\0:.1.1_ S~O-2x1
..
':i".'
;i::;
~-:
r//eS~7f ;/V'
~ ;fC:lJC1r f1M~ ~.
t/ wert H4.wodL +to",
" ~ ---
/.~~h~f\ ~
:,; ( :;; f'1'tN T/ DJ tI ss:: 0 D " ~ 33tA if'
4vA-'
,jeMS1bi(
(;klr 9/6.).D INd,
~-
~IJJ(
Si4rak'tf ~~),. ~O /rJ~
~(~kJ /NC{. -'
~rft[ ') /;~ ts3"to - ( 11 33~.fr
.1NsF- I ~ __ _ ~
c-
.--- ' c:< '-to-tc j
11;!~Yt?f::tt
)J jb'\) loJ
"3 : /-1011 {}Jf.o( cq I ;;Pfj,/6 C<<,
);/is,~/( .5f /' .~
Wtfj,;( ~ 6J7./s 7.?-730
I/Scz, tk~r /y{./ /'1:J.v~ c7os-.70
/1:, - }/of?
(1, .- 1M (; 0 t:tl. / oj_ tj C"<fi '
,"e1',) I ~ Ie
Si1fijd.;( ~ /1 7~1, b6 Ii 1~tlt/O
I (
:;"1 3 ~r
~fI-( khf ,--:SJ7/~ dYO,/D
, f? ' /J ~
) {,) ~q
~r-{ 1I>e :J $"'J-. ! 0 ;2 01.0 (
: / rj j)M./l',I 30J. o{O '" ~ 'I r I c, )b :510. ,l.- a, ..1 (" </11?
cdc/41 - (7 ( q--t7~
:"0--1' /-l C -- - '-,-; B -.r?, ~ / - "'- S; :, (f;(;fJ
.
~ '. ...~-- .~
d3/J-~ &//c;Z:::-
5 C' uJ/J~ +r C 0/4 /Vf C; Ko(
,- ~~ ref' t:(-4d /J ~-;,(df'j cII<?';J',
)
) ~LJNI(
;jtFcft5 wi 1/ ~ 6{, t/(
/{J1ffc(
kit! ' (
)~~:~){ lJ-qt et< 6?~.C;(
(})o I r
)&iet Bkr (~~Ot/1'
~1(,hl( 11-3, to ~#-~;5~ J-~(
f5; fIg. ()O f J;V6t/l~
~~e ~85 1101 )~~/ltj~
I, (i -;{- ~ '
y} &(?~. C?-OI-0
DOY,! &'1 f7!e.
hie l(t /l~ml
()vet'(uuJ .s YoY'J"C.
'.
.
~~ !ItJJl1tXV {!f);I/~ (L
cf(D. uJA:1f (j;VV\tVl-4:vt!
75'- Skt ft- Y /f CP ~ f/t'm~~;;f
&fri,0, J!(ill1tffllJ. /7MI&/ fM;w/ Aid y-.r
(khe, l~feJ"U +l!4dG- /f'('(.~
Pot! 5:41' bd 531f,.OD t/-;r./DCtJ 0 ~/57S()
, ./
f I )' '- q 1/3CZ\ ' / 0 "
10-8;or' r~/5 -t''it . 5l"'s.~f{ ?'I L( I ()
''jJ() AP/ ( t/emey eo-j, e 97/. 3D t18) .</ I
~(,IX~ ,t~lfr/'1J4/tx~/~, f' ~~.( 3~2. :,J
~/JJ %~( /;kfrepAvt ~(e- 0/ tj;fo,1JQ 1o,~L
ir-- 8''131 8t>~fdpe j41e I t!6. YJ
fflJ . iiVt :S . 371-/(, 71f.3z, ,?Vo.; 0
:;1)/ d!93. f)o
j./oA )eI7J-1bff
( ,,- :::::--------- -----------
}O ~ [1lifj Y~t>1 bl(
;klf5 . (<de )1- I;'"' ;r41v
7
~911/o
1111,h
-'f" I
l/g1 Xy'
('6''j3\
Str..e It IN
'.
'.
FROM COMM~ND OFFICE FURNITURE 08.03.1993 16: 59 P. 1
OFFICE FURNITURE
6440 Garden Rd.. Riviera Beach. FL 33404 407/848-4633
January 11, 1993
Nick Strippoli
Purchasing Agent
Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
415 Gator Drive
Lantana, FL 33462
Dear Nick:
We will accept the extension of the Palm Beach County
Sheriff's Office Bid #91-0520-64 for the fiscal year
beginning October 1st, 1992 thru september 30, 1993. All
Hon products will be available at a 57.5% discount from
Command Office Furniture. This discount applies to all
the Hon product line, including the Concensys Panel
systems.
We appreciate your business and look forward to a
successful relationship in 1993. If you have any
questions regarding our bid, please don't hesitate to
c :'1:\\ me .
~' arm Regards,
{e ,
'-" .
Da d R inso~ Da snitkin
. Sales Manager Sales Representative
cc: Dave Robinson
Jerry Nolan
..
'.
.
FROM COMMRND OFFICE FURNITURE 08.03.1993 17: 00 P. 2
THE SCHOOL BOARD OR. O. MONIOA UHLHORN
OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPERINTENDENT
Of SCHOOL8
Contraoting and Proourement
3326 Porest Hill Bl Vd',
West Palm Beaoh, FL 33406-6813
(40'7) 434-8216
Date: August 20. 1992
To: Command Office Furniture
6440 Garden Road
Riviera Beach. Fl. ~
Subject: Letter of Agreement
Per Bid Number: SB 93c-81L
Title: Term Contract for Clasroom.
Auditorium, Office & Media Furniture
I
This is to advise you that on Au~ust 19. 1992 the School Board of Palm Beach
County. Florida. has accepted your offer to furnish
services/equipment/supplies as per attached bid tabulation. This acceptance
is subject to compliance with bid!specifications. terms and conditions. all
pertinent laws of the State of Florida and instructions as determined by the
General Counsel for the School Board.
Proof of Insurance as per Special Condition I. see attached "Insurance
Requirements". must be furnished within f if teen (15) days of this
notification. Your insurance company is required to have the School Board of
Palm Beach County. Florida. NAHKD AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED. No work shall
commence until we receive the certificate. Certificate of insurance must
reference above bid number.
Purchase order will be issued to cover services/equipment/supplies as the need
arises.
Thank you for your bid and we are looking forward to doing business with you
or your company. ,.
"-
Y.
..~~.
tty . ~~r. Directo~
Department of Purchasing and Stores
I
,
ce: bid file
Harold Laird. Buyer
(award. ins)
.'
\ \
., -
"
..
FRO~ COMM~ND OFFICE FURNITURE 138.133.1993 17: e 1
P. 3
...:~- ,',I ..----.- --
Page 25
.
I
I \ (Continued)
I
ITEM 83 ITEM 84 ITEM 85 ITEM 86 ITEM 67
PLEION PLYMOLO QUAKER QUAR'l'BT RAYNOR
VENOOR DEL/OISC DEL/DISC DEL/DISC DEL/DISC DEL/OISC
rAB PRODUCTS - - - - '- ... - - - 56/20% - - - - - -
,
UNIVERSAL SEATING CO. - - - 30/30% - - - - - - - - - - - -
VIRCO MFG. CORPORATION - - - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - -
:
ITEM 89 rl'ro! 90 ITEM 91 ITEM 92 ITEM 93' ~ ITEM 94
RUSS BASS SP RICH SAF'ECO SAMSONI'I'E SCHWAB SEBRIT!
VENDOR DEL/DISC mlL/DISC DEL/DISC DEL/DISC DEL/DISC DEL/DISC
( AMR OFFICE SUPPLyr~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AARON RENTS & SELLS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BECKLEY-CARDY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CAJ ASSOCIATES - - - -'- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CAMILO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CARGO FURNITURE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CENTRAL AUDIO VISUAL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CDr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
COMMAND OFFICE EQUIP. - - - - - - - - - 40/41. 5% 40/42.5% - - -
CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CORPORATE LOGIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
i
I
D.C. JAEGER CORP. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DECORA OFFICE FURN. - - - 30/41.85% 40/28% 45/40.33\ 40/20.66\ - - -
DESIGNER SERVICE BUREAU - - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I I
D & L ENTERPRISES - - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
,
ENVIRONETICS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
,
FLORIDA VIDEO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.'
FREE FORM FIVE INT. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
INTERIORS OF PB , - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - .. - -
.', ,~ ~ ~
.'-
./ . '
,-
,.
'.
. .
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ffiv1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i Ws - I - SPECIAL MEETING OF AUGUST 3, 1993
REVIEW OF TENNIS CENTER PHASE II PLANS
DATE: July 30, 1993
Digby Bridges, architect, will be making a presentation of the plans
for Phase II at Tuesday evening's meeting.
Attached is a copy of the approximate budget estimate for Phase II of
the Tennis Center. The original planning budget for Phase II was
$300,000. The estimated cost is now at $385,000, plus general
cons tractor requirements, overhead and profit. In order to get the
project closer to the original budget, staff is recommending that the
City work with the architect and act as our own general contractor.
Below is a list of possible changes to the project to reduce the
cost:
Possible Cost Reductions
Delete:
-interlocking pavers on N.W. 1st Avenue $ 10 260 oC. k ~h
,
-interlocking pavers on southeast corner 24,750 'I
-traffic signs 250 'I
-exfiltration trench and catch basin 10,000 "
-feature gazebo 10,000 "
Move plywood court protection to operating budget 7 ,500 -
Build five ( 5 ) clay and one ( 1 ) hard court instead of
six (6 ) clay courts 26.650
$ 89,410
Possible Cost Increases
Lighting of four (4) clay courts at southeast corner S 20.750
Net cost reduction $ 68,660
Resulting net project cost $385,934
- 68.660
$317,274
plus contingencies
W:s / I
'.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joe Weldon, Director of Parks and Recreation
FROM: Ed Foster, Tennis Supervisor
SUBJECT: Installation of _( 1) Soft Court
DATE: July 30,1993
Based on (1) soft court rented (3) times a day during the
busy season, (2) times a day during average play time, and
(1) time during the slower summer season, the following revenues
are projected.
90 days rented (3 ) times daily @ $36.00 = $3240.
60 days rented (2) times daily @ $24.00 = $1440.
75 days rented (1) time daily @ $12.00 = $ 900.
Total projected $5580.
revenue
A soft court will also be utilized for all tournaments and some
league play. A hard court will sit idle.
The Tennis Board of Directors voted unanimously for the new
courts to all be soft.
In a recent member survey, 49 out of 50 members preferred clay
courts be installed.
A hard court would bring in a maximum of $500 for an entire year.
'.
.
~
August 1, 1993
Dear Sirs:
On Wednesday, Ju~ 28th, Mr. Joe Weldon reviewed the new changes for the
, Delray Tennis Center with the Tennis Board. There were a few change the Board
i
unanismously agreed ypon: 1. A gazebo is being entertained for the SE comer of the
Tennis Center. The Board is against it due to it becoming a potentialloitenng area, po-
tential noise and altercation area, and cost.
2. A gate between the courts and the Community Center is being
entertained. The Board would like it to be flush against the Community Center vs. the
way it is seen on the plans.
3. Their was a question regarding file future courts just to the West of the
Stadium court. Is there any reason file lighting posts cannot be to the West of
the Courts?
4. No plans are seen as to Informational Bulletin Board discussed Willl Mr. D.
Bridges.
5. MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL: DISCUSSION ON # OF
HARDCOURTS VS. CtA YCOURTS. ( Please see attached letter).
Sincerely,
~>Lk~~
"
," Frank Lavemia, M.D.
I Delray Beach Tennis Board
I'
I "
\,.,<, , .
,
;
i
'.
,,;
- :'.1
FR.ll.NK 1A VERNIA M.D.
INTERNAL MEDICINE AND DIABETES
1347 EAST SAMPLE ROAD
POMPANO BEACH. FL. 33064
AUGUST 1, 1993
Dear Mr. Harden;
On Wednesday, July 28, the Dekay Beach Tennis Board met at which time we
discllssed and resolved the following isslles unanismously, All? members of the
Board were present, as well as, Mr. Joe Weldon, Director of Parks and Recreation,
and Ed Foster, Director of Tennis.
Of utmost impor1ance, we again discussed security. We wholeheartdly feel that
security measures are still not being looked at carefully enough. The members are
again complaining of individuals that are riding thru the Club on motorcycles and bikes.
We have loiterers walking thru pushing shopping calis. It is velY tough to attract new
membership when this is going on, We also do not feel tllat the front desk is
responsible to take care of this issue,
We were taking aback by a newspaper clipping as to how many hardcourts were
going to be added. We ,the Board, had spoken with Mr. David Harden as to what the
needs of the membership were over 11/2 months ago, He made us understood that
6 clay cOLll1s were going to be put in. We ask you, "What do we have to do to
finalize this matter?1\ We sUlveyed the membership as to how many like to use
HardcoUlis, Only 1 individual stated that they like to use the HardcoUl1s in a regular
fashion.
It has also come to the attention of the Board, that a Mr. Colussi (sp.?) from the old
Laver's development came over to speak with the City about the Sunshine Cup and
Continental Cup, The membership and Board does not want to give up the courts for a
7-10 day period during the High season for this Junior tournament
'.
-
that finacially would not be rewarding to the Ci~, We are getting mixed messages as to
your expectations from the tennis center. On one stroke, you want us to self sustain,
but in the other stroke, you want to give away moneys to a tournament that you will end
up subsidizing more than you have in tile past. There is an influx '
of tourists at that time of the year who are coming into play at the Tennis center, Some
of these tourists are staying downtown and helping our community community vs,
putting up tennis players for free. You must weigh the pluses and negatives with all
involved, instead of making unilateral decisions with a few.
Finally I am hoping that we will start to get more attention to our needs as a Board,
We have formed thethe Delray Beach Tennis Association who is running some
tournaments to try to upgrade the Clubhouse with the monies that are coming in. We
are in the planning phases of having the UNOPEN Open in September. We hope to
bring in approximately $ 5,000,00 from community backing. We hope that some of you
tennis fans come out and partake in some of these fine activities. Some us plan to
come to the next City Hall meeting on August 3, so we can start to voice all of our
concerns, See you there.
Sincerely,
//,,-,.,'" , )
-- })'; LL---'~ - /. - ~\- l
,~I ,,~~'-""'\..~'~ <..." }
Frank Lavernia, M.D.
Delray Beach Tennis Board
"
C I T Y of DELRAY B L ^ C II
DI:LRAY TENNIS CENTRE
PHASE II
APPROXIMATE BUDGET ESTIMATE
DIGBY BRIDGES. MARSH & ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTS and PLANNERS
JULY,1993
"
DELRAY BEACH TENNIS CENTER - PHASE II
ORIGINAL SCOPE OF WORK
~ APPROXIMATE ESTIMATE JULY, 1993
'Jf~:n;/ 6 Clay Courts; Fencing; Windscreens 191,750
7 Paving & Drainage 77,509
b Electrics 26,900
2 ~oo
~ Plumbing 1 ~ 21J.
ID sound System 6,000
II signage 10,350
!~Tubular Rail to Center Court 2,700
;3 Gazebos to Courts 3,000
i3 Feature Gazebo 10,000
/4Landscaping & Irrigation 20,000
IS Security Fencing 10,350
\_j g 37.>
I~ Fire Sprinkler Installations 17,575
/9 Tent Footings 2,000
/~/Plywood Protection for Court 7.500
$ 8~ 2>~
39:;, 4
ADD: contingencies 5% 19.792
415,639
ADD: General Contractor General Requirements 9% 37.407
453,046
ADD: General Contractor Overheads & Profit 10% 45.305
AMOUNT OF ESTIMATE 498,351
--------
--------
'.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH TENNIS CENTRE
PHASE II
A P PRO X I MAT E BUD GET EST I MAT E
SUM MAR Y - A L T ERN ATE I
page
2 DEMOLITION $36,869
3 SITEWORK $6,411
4 TENNIS COURTS - ALTERNATE I $235,656
5 TENNIS COURTS - ALTERNATE II $0
6 TENNIS COURTS - ANCILLARY ITEMS $68,934
7 PAVING and DRAINAGE $90,821
8 ELECTRICS 34,671
9 PLUMBING $12,245
10 SOUND SYSTEM $7,374
11 SIGNAGE and BULLETIN BOARD $13,340
12 STADIUM COURT LOWER RAILING $3,480
13 GAZEBOS and BENCHES $20,881
14 LANDSCAPING and IRRIGATION $25,779
15 SECURITY FENCING $13,340
16 PRACTICE COURT $11,520
17 CARPETING $4,265
18 FIRE SPRINKLER INSTALLATION $22,653
19 TENT FOOTINGS $2,578
20 PLYWOOD COURT PROTECTION $9,667
21 STADIUM COURT EXPANSION - EAST $610,801
22 STADIUM COURT EXPANSION - WEST $594,824
AMOUNT of ESTIMATE $1,826,108
NOTE :
The above amounts do not include Architect's Fees
1 (i)
'.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH TENNIS CENTRE
PHASE II
A P PRO X I MAT E BUD GET EST I MAT E
SUM MAR Y - A L T ERN ATE I I
page
2 DEMOLITION $36,869
3 SITEWORK $6,411
4 TENNIS COURTS - ALTERNATE I $0
5 TENNIS COURTS - ALTERNATE II $203,703
6 TENNIS COURTS - ANCILLARY ITEMS $68,934
7 PAVING and DRAINAGE $90,821
8 ELECTRICS 34,671
9 PLUMBING $12,245
10 SOUND SYSTEM $7,374
11 SIGNAGE and BULLETIN BOARD $13,340
12 STADIUM COURT LOWER RAILING $3,480
13 GAZEBOS and BENCHES $20,881
14 LANDSCAPING and IRRIGATION $25,779
15 SECURITY FENCING $13,340
16 PRACTICE COURT $11,520
17 CARPETING $4,265
18 FIRE SPRINKLER INSTALLATION $22,653
19 TENT FOOTINGS $2,578
20 PLYWOOD COURT PROTECTION $9,667
21 STADIUM COURT EXPANSION - EAST $610,801
22 STADIUM COURT EXPANSION - WEST $594,824
AMOUNT of ESTIMATE $l,1::l26,10B
NOTE :
The above amounts do not include Architect's Fees
1 (ii)
"
DEMOLITION
Demolish existing Fire station ; fill all
voids level ; cap off all utilities ;
remove debris off site LS 25,000
Note : The above item excludes asbestos
abatement and testing costs and costs of
testing and treating contaminated soil
Miscellaneous Demolitions 5,000
$30,000
Add :
Contingencies 2.5 % $750
$30,750
Add .
.
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $2,768
$33,518
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $3,352
2 TO SUMMARY $36,869
"
SITEWORK
REGRADING
Regrade to entire north side of Main Ent-
rance walkway and adjacent to south side
of community center ; repair broken irr-
igation lines and replace heads. LS 2,500
RETAINING WALL and STEPS
Extend existing CBS/stucco retaining wall
+/- 4'0" high . to south side of Commun-
,
ity Center : paint stucco ; 45 lf 35.00 1,575
Concrete steps to Community Center ; 15'0"
wide ; 3 risers : broom finished concrete .
,
handrails LS 1,500
$5,575
Add .
.
contingencies 7.5 9-:- $418
0
$5,993
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 9-:- $539
0
$6,533
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 9-:- $653
0
3 TO SUMMARY $6,411
'l'F:NNJS COURTS
AL'rERNATE I
Clay Courts, including removable fence
and ujg water systems 6 no 182,000
Wind Screening 13,000 sf 0.75 9,750
191,750
Add :
contingencies 2.5 % 4,794
$196,544
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $17,689
$214,233
Add .
.
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $21,423
TO SUMMARY $235,656
4
.,
TENNIS COUH'l'S
ALTEHNATE II
Clay Courts, including removable fence 5 no )
and u/g watering system )
l 156,000
Hard Court, including ditto 1 no l
Wind Screening 13,000 s 0.75 9,750
$165,750
Add :
contingencies 2.5 % $4,144
$169,894
Add .
.
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 ~ $15,290
0
$l8S,184
Add :
General contractor's a.H.p 10 ~ $18,518
0
TO SUMMARY $203,703
5
'.
TENNIS COURT ANCILLARY ITEMS
TOURNAMENT STORAGE BUILDINGS
Storage building ; for tournament equip't;
under south stadium stand 476 s 40.00 19,040
Ditto; for Junior Programs ; under north
stadium stand 476 s 40.00 19,040
COURT LIGHTING
Lighting to 4 clay courts at SE corner .
,
metal poles LS 20,750
Lighting to 2 clay courts at west of Stad-
ium Court ; metal poles NIC 0
Add . $58,830
.
Contingencies 7.5 % $4,412
$63,242
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $5,692
$68,934
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $6,893
TO SUMMARY $68,934
6
PAVING and DRAINAGE
Asphalt paving to Atlantic parking area 5,200 sf 1. 00 5,200
Soil stabilisation ditto 1,500 sf 0.75 1,125
Interlocking paving ditto 1,200 sf 6.00 7,200
Ditto, along NW 1st Avenue. 1,710 sf 6.00 10,260
Ditto, at southeast corner 4,125 sf 6.00 24,750
Pavement marking LS 500
Curbing 450 lf 6.00 2,700
Traffic signs LS 250
Drainage to courts west of stadium LS 5,000
Connect court drainage to existing LS 1,000
Trench drains and covers at Courts 6, 17 170 If 15.00 2,550
Exfiltration trench and catchbasins LS 10,000
750 gallon concrete grease trap 1 no 1500 1,500
Widen concretewalkway at west of stadium 1,125 sf 2.00 2,250
Concrete paving to south of Courts 14-l7 1,312 sf 2.00 2,624
Ditto to storage areas under stands 300 sf 2.00 600
$77,509
contingencies 7.5 ~ $5,813
0
$83,322
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $7,499
$90,821
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $9,082
TO SUMMARY $90,821
7
!-: 1,1-:("1'1\ I ('~;
To cooking tents LS 1,500
To TV electrical outlet LS 1,500
110V Supply to duplex outlet at courts 6 no 300 1,800
Ditto, to court irrigation control 3 no 300 900
Ditto, to water coolers 4 no 300 1,200
Ditto, to Hospitality Tent A.C. units 2 no '5,000 10,000
site Lighting LS 2,500
Ditto, to landscaping and feature gazebo LS 4,250
Three phase supply to Compactor LS 2,000
Additional Security Lighting LS 1,000
Miscellaneous Electrics LS 250
$ ,26,900
Add :
Contingencies 7.5 % $ 2,017
$ 28,917
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $ 2,602
Add . $ 31,519
.
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 ~ $ 3,152
0
TO SUMMARY $ 34,671
8
~
'.
PLUMBING
PLUMBING INSTALLATION COMPLETE TO THE
FOLLOWING ITEMS '-
Hose bibs 6 no 500 3,000
Drainage connection of court underground
watering system to existing 3 no 500 1,500
Water coolers at gazebos 2 no 1,250 2,500
Ditto, at stadium umpire's seat 1 no 1,250 1,250
Ditto, at west courts 1 no 1,250 1,250
$9,500
Add :
contingencies 7.5 % $713
$10,213
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $919
$11,132
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $1,113
TO SUMMARY $12,245
9
..
SOUND SY:"TEM
As per Good Life - Delray Beach LS 6,000
Add : $6,000
Contingencies 2.5 9.:- $150
0
$6,150
Add .
.
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 9.:- $554
0
$6,704
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $670
TO SUMMARY $7,374
10
'.
STGNAGE and BULLETIN BOARD
SIGNAGE
Signage to six courts LS 600
Illuminated feature sign at S.E. corner LS 5,000
Bronze plaque 2 no 1,000 2,000
Hanging sign and wall bracket to "Ladies" 1 no 500 500
Ditto to " Men " 1 no 500 500
BULLETIN BOARD
Covered Bulletin Board : 12'0" long x 4'0"
wide x 9'0"high : glass doors : lighting 1 no 1,750 1,750
Add . $10,350
.
Contingencies 7.5 % $776
$11,126
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $1,001
$12,128
Add .
.
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 9-- $1,213
0
TO MAIN SUMMARY $13,340
11
-.
.
STADIUM COURT LOWER RAILING
Aluminum circular tube rail along bottom
of Stadium Court internal railings 450 If 6.00 2,700
Add .
.
Contingencies 7.5 % 203
$2,903
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $261
$3,164
Add .
.
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $316
TO SUMMARY $3,480
12
<,
GAZEBOS and BENCHES
'rubular steel framed, canvas covered
gazebo, 10'0" x 20'0" on plan 2 no 1,500 3,000
Concrete framed, standing seam roofed
gazebo ; 20'O"x 20'0" on plan . south-
,
east corner 1 n010,OOO 10,000
Lutyens teak benches ; 8'6" long 2 no 1,600 3,200
Add : $16,200
contingencies 7.5 % $1,215
$17,415
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 ~ $1,567
0
$18,982
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $1,898
TO SUMMARY $20,881
13
'.
LANDSCAPING and IRRIGATION
LANDSCAPING
As per Thornbrough & Associates LS 15,000
IRRIGATION
As per Thornbrough & Associates LS 5,000
$20,000
Add :
Contingencies 7.5 ~ $1,500
0
$21,500
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $1,935
$23,435
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $2,344
TO SUMMARY $25,779
14
..
.
SECllHlTY FENCING
6'0" High vinyl covered chain link fence NIC 0
Extra for rolling gate ; 25'0" wide NIC 0
Architectural security fencing to
Clubhouse 40 If 40.00 1,600
Ditto, to community Center 150 If 40.00 6,000
Extra for single gate ; 4'0" wide 1 no 250 250
Extra for double gates ; 8'0" wide 5 pr 500 2,500
$10,350
Add :
Contingencies 7.5 S!- $776
0
$11,126
Add .
.
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $1,001
$12,128
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $1,213
TO SUMMARY $13,340
15
'.
PRACTICE COURT
Take up existing asphalt paving ; remove
to dump 2,500 sf 0.75 1,875
Concrete paving to Tennis Court 2,500 sf 2.00 5,000
Court painting / lining 2,750 sf 0.75 2,063
$8,938
Add :
Contingencies 7.5 ~ $670
0
$9,608
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $865
$10,473
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $1,047
TO SUMMARY $11,520
16
'.
CAHPETING
Carpeting to handicap ramp LS 1,250
Carpeting to Rose Garden LS 1,110
Carpeting to upper walkway LS 1,110
3,470
Add :
.Contingencies 2.5 ~ 87
0
3,557
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % 320
$3,877
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $388
TO SUMMARY $4,265
17
'.
PfRE SPRINKLER INSTALLATION
New fire line into complex 5,000
Installation to existing south storeroom 1,500 sf 1. 25 1,875
Ditto to area north of above storeroom,
under stadium 1,500 sf 1.00 1,500
.-
Ditto to new storage rooms 950 sf 1.00 950
Ditto under new east stand 8,250 sf 1.00 8,250
$17,575
Add :
Contingencies 7.5 % $1,318
$18,893
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $1,700
$20,594
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $2,059
TO SUMMARY $22,653
18
'.
'.
TENT FOOTINGS
Reinforced concrete footings, 2'0" x 3'0" 16 no 125 2,000
Add :
contingencies 7.5 ~ 150
0
2,150
Add .
.
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % 194
2,344
Add .
.
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 ~ 234
0
TO SUMMARY $2,578
19
"
PLYWOOD COURT PROTECTION
Plywood court protection to tennis courts
and walkway from Food tent to Food court;
3/411 plywood on 2" x 4" PT sleepers at
24" O.c. ; 1/3 of Court No. 15 2,500 sf 1. 50 3,750
Ditto ; 1/3rd Court No. 16 2,500 sf 1. 50 3,750
$7,500
Add :
Contingencies 7.5 % $563
$8,063
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 % $726
$8,788
Add .
.
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 % $879
TO SUMMARY $9,667
20
'.
STADIUM COURT EXPANSION - EAST
Stadium Court additions, including found-
ations and framing by Southern Bleachers
for 2,785 seats LS 350,000
Interlocking paving under stand 10,500 sf 6.00 63,000
Lighting of exitways LS 1,500
Signage LS 500
Restrooms - male 600 sf 60.00 36,000
Restrooms - female 750 sf 60.00 45,000
Adapt staircase for escape LS 1,000
Add . $497,000
.
contingencies 2.5 ~ $12,425
0
$509,425
Add .
.
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 ~ $45,848
0
$555,273
Add :
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 ~ $55,527
0
21 TO SUMMARY $610,801
..
.
STADIUM COURT EXPANSION - WEST
Stadium Court additions, including found-
ations and framing by Southern Bleachers
for 2,800 seats LS 400,000
Lighting of exitways LS 1,500
signage LS 500
Restrooms - male 600 sf 60.00 36,000
Restrooms - female 750 sf 60.00 45,000
Adapt staircase for escape LS 1,000
Add . $484,000
.
Contingencies 2.5 9-, $12,100
0
$496,100
Add :
General Contractor's General Requirements 9 9-, $44,649
0
$540,749
Add .
.
General Contractor's O.H.P 10 9-, $54,075
0
22 TO SUMMARY $594,824
'.
. .
MEMORANDUM
----------
TO: DAVID HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
FROM: LULA BUTLER, DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT~
RE: CONSIDERATION OF SELECTED BEAUTIFICATION TO LAKE IDA ROAD
DATE: JULY 27, 1993
ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION
- -
Presentation of the conditions of the landscaping along Lake Ida Road,
generally from Congress Avenue to Military Trail, and a request for
consideration of selected improvements.
BACKGROUND
Meetings were held in May and July with the residents along Lake Ida Road to
discuss the landscaping, considering the proposed 1987 beautification
project commitment.
The 1987 Utility Tax Fund allocated $193 thousand for the Lake Ida Road
beautification project. Due to uncertainty about the road widening, it was
apparent that the money could not be spent within the time period required.
This money was ultimately used for other beautification projects with a
commitment for funding Lake Ida Road through the 5-year Capital Improvement
Plan.
Residents were interested in improving private and public properties as well
as upgrading the landscaping within the right-of-way. Some of the conditions
identified can be remedied via enforcement with property owners or through
the involvement of specific City Departments. Other areas would rely on the
funding through the Capital Improvement Plan. Areas identified are discussed
below.
1. UNSIGHTLY CONDITION OF THE 'ABANDONED' PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING - This
facility is located east of Congress and is really not abandoned at
all. The City currently uses this facility for maintaining an inventory
of supplies for the Purchasing Department.
The City's Maintenance Division will be making repairs to the exterior
of the building including replacing broken windows, repairing roof and
fascia, replacing entrance and overhead doors, pressure cleaning and
painting. As these items are being done 'in house', they will be
worked in as scheduling permits.
A landscape plan providing a buffer along the chain-link fence has
been forwarded to Environmental Services for implementation. The
landscaping, will, therefore, hopefully be funded through the water &
sewer fund.
.
1 WS/0
..
.
2. TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT LAKE IDA AND MILITARY TRAIL - The County has
responded to a letter from Ben Stackhouse from Country Manors regarding
the traffic signal coordination. The green time for the east/west
movement has gradually been changed from the original signal timing of
25 seconds, to 35 seconds on January 5, 1993, and most recently to 40
seconds. This is the maximum amount of time that can be allowed
without adversely effecting the efficiency of the coordinated system
relative to the possible impact on traffic movement on Military Trail.
The County further noted that the the turn-lane length is sub-standard
and should be increased from 90 feet to 200 feet. The City has asked
the County for a schedule for this improvement.
3. UNSIGHTLY CONDITION OF THE WALL AT LAKE FOREST SOUTH - The City
recently got a commitment from Mr. Larazony to pressure clean the wall
and repaint it if necessary. This should be done within the next two
weeks.
4. UPGRADING THE LANDSCAPING ALONG LAKE IDA ROAD - For discussion and
presentation purposes it is easier to define possible improvements in
segments. With the exception of the large vacant tracts at the
intersection of Congress and Lake Ida the discussion will begin on the
north side of the road at Lake Ida and continue to Military, at which
point the discussion will focus on the south side of the road traveling
from Military back to Lake Ida Road.
a. Vacant Lots at Lake Ida ! Congress
The proposed landscape treatment would be similar on both lots.
Clusters of 5 Oleander bushes spaced at 40 feet on center are suggested
due to their drought tolerance. Additionally, a group of Sabal Palms
could be planted at the diagonals .
Estimate : The cost of improvements to both lots would be $4,100 for
the installation of plant materials.
Staff Recommendation: Staff does not recommend that this landscaping be
installed on the vacant lots as this is a transient situation.
Additional costs for a watering truck would have to be factored in as
there is no irrigation at the site.
The City's Code Enforcement Department will be asked to contact the
property owners to step up the frequency of mowing these vacant tracts.
b. North side of the road between Rainberry Lakes and Davis Road
The existing landscaping serves as a good back-drop for additional
flowering trees. Clusters of White Orchid Trees are proposed in
conjunction with 3 Royal Poinciana Trees.
Estimate: $4,170 for the installation of plant materials.
2
'.
\
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval as 'there would be no
long term maintenance costs if the adjacent Homeowner Association
agreed to maintain the trees as part of their landscape. The existing
irrigation system deems services of a watering truck unnecessary.
c. Intersections of Davis Road! Lake Ida Road, Coral Way ! Lake Ida and
Lawrence Road & Lake Ida
----
The delineation of these major north/south roadways could be achieved
by the installation of groups of Sabal Palms with understory plantings
of Liriope and flowering Pentas. As flowering and shade trees are the
major theme proposed for upgrades, the Sabals would provide a marked
delineation of the intersections.
Estimate: $3,055 for the installation of plant materials.
Staff Recommendation: Staff supports these improvements although
the services of a watering truck or other methods of establishing the
plant materials will be needed.
d. North side of the road between Davis Road and Rainberry Boulevard
Again, the existing landscaping could benefit with the addition of some
flowering trees. Three Clusters of Yellow Poincianas are proposed.
Estimate: $1,800 for the installation of plant materials.
Staff Recommendation: Staff supports the addition of these trees. The
area is irrigated and the trees could be planted with the caveat that
the Homeowners Association would maintain them along with the rest of
their landscaping.
e. North side of the road between Rainberry Boulevard! N.W. 37th Avenue
Alternating clusters of White Orchid Trees and Purple Orchid Trees will
frame flowering Jacaranda Trees.
Estimate: $5,508 for the installation of plant materials.
Staff Recommendation: Staff supports the addition of these trees. The
area is irrigated and the adjacent subdivision would assume the
maintenance.
f. North side between 37th Avenue & entrance to Lake Forest South
-- - - -- -
There is the potential for landscaping as there is approximately 25 to
30 feet between the sidewalk and the walls or fences. All that exists
in terms of trees are a few of Acacias. Fences in this area are all
different colors and many are sagging. No conflicts exist with overhead
powerlines, but there is no irrigation.
Estimate: $ 3,760.00 for installation of plant materials.
3
"
'.
~
Staff Recommendation: Staff supports the addition of these trees since
there is very little landscaping in this area. The question of the
ongoing maintenance of these trees will have to be discussed with the
adjacent Homeowners Association. The services of a watering truck for
the establishment of these trees will also be required.
g. North side between Barwick Road ! Military Trail
This area is dominated by the eight foot Ficus hedge surrounding
Country Manors and is in need of shade trees and vertical elements to
break up the length of the existing hedge.
Trees would have to be smaller at maturity since there is a very high
voltage overhead powerline in this area. Between each set of power
poles a cluster of East Palatka Hollies is proposed flanked with a
group of Oleander Standards. This equates to 10 clusters of Hollies (30
total) and 20 groups of Oleanders (60 total).
Estimate: Installation of plant materials $9,600.00.
Staff Recommendation: Staff would support the installation of these
trees with the condition that they be maintained by Country Manors.
Additionally, irrigation would need to be extended into this area from
County Manors system, if possible. If this is not possible, the
feasibility of providing a watering truck for this great a distance
would be prohibitive. In this case, I would recommend that only the
section at the intersection of Barwick & Lake Ida be landscaped, which
would balance with the further recommendation of a Gateway feature at
Military Trail outlined below.
Alternate Cost Estimate: $2,210.00.
h. Gateway Feature at Military Trail and Lake Ida
For a distance of 200 feet from Military Trail a landscape treatment is
proposed in a mirror image along Rainberry Woods and Country Manors.
Due to the continuation of the overhead powerlines, it will be the same
theme as proposed along Country Manors, but at a closer spacing.
Estimate: Installation of plant materials $4,420.00.
Staff Recommendation: This area is probably not under irrigation but
the expense to establish the material with a watering truck is
warranted due to the impact as a major gateway coming off Military
Trail.
i. South side S.W. corner of Lake Ida & Barwick
--- ----
An existing white masonry fence with a brown cap lends itself to the
installation of oleander bushes to punctuate the alternating panels.
There are eleven panels in front of which a group of three oleanders
can be planted (total of 33).
4
'.
Estimate: Installation of plant materials $250.00.
Staff Recommendation: Staff feels this is a big impact for little
money.
j. South side - Chatelaine
---
Between Barwick Road & West Park Baptist Church there is a variety of
fences & landscape treatments. This is probably the worst section. A
combination of problems needs to be addressed. The first is that the
Homeowners Association needs to take responsibility for the maintenance
of the swale area as is required by other developments. This primarily
concerns the mowing of the swale. Since there is no ability to
establish a landscape theme due to the many different types of
vegetation (Area Palms, Ficus, Slash Pines). It may be possible in the
areas that have deteriorated fencing to install some random plantings
of natives, such as Myrsine, Firebush, Spanish Stopper and Wild Coffee.
The perimeter of Chatelaine east of the main entrance does not look too
bad except for a section of Redwood weave fence that needs restaining.
While the City does not have any codes which require the aesthetic
maintenance of fences (short of falling down), the Homeowners
Association may be able to extract some improvements.
The City may also want to amend the nuisance ordinance 100.08 to
include the aesthetic maintenance of fences that are visible from a
right-of-way. Currently the ordinance addresses only exterior building
walls.
Estimate: No estimate has been provided for this at this time.
Staff Recommendation: The Homeowners Association should maintain the
swale, exert pressure on their Association members to improve the
appearance of the perimeter of their community and some thought should
be given to revising City Ordinances to require maintenance to fences
visible from rights-of way. After this is done the City may want to
revisit a native landscape buffer.
k. South side Street Tree Planting in front of Single Family Residences
Initiate an Adopt-A-Tree Program to install a shade tree in front of
each residence. A few properties have trees already. This side of the
road does have overhead power so trees would have to be not too large
at maturity. East Palatka Holly is recommended, which will tie in with
there use along other sections of the road.
Estimate: Installation of 24 Hollies $4,320.00.
Staff Recommendation: Staff feels that this would make a big impact on
the area as this side of the road is unbalanced with the north side
due to the lack of landscaping. Homeowner participation in the
establishment of these trees by providing water and future maintenance
would be the key to the success of this segment.
S
'.
SUMMARY OF COST ESTIMATES
--
Landscape Improvements
a. $ 4,100.00 - Vacant Lots at Lake Ida & Congress Avenue.
b. $ 4,170.00 - North side between Rainberry Lakes & Davis Road.
c. $ 3,055.00 - Intersections at Davis Road, Coral Way & Lawrence Road.
d. $ 1,800.00 - North side between Davis Road & Rainberry Boulevard.
e. $ 5,508.00 - North side between Rainberry Boulevard & N.W. 37th Avenue.
f. $ 3,760.00 - North side between N.W. 37th Avenue & Lake Forest South.
g. $ 9,600.00 - North side between Barwick & Military Trail.
h. $ 4,420.00 - Gateway feature Military & Lake Ida Road.
i. $ 250.00 - South side S.W. corner Lk. Ida & Barwick Road.
j. ????????? - South side Chatelaine needs revisiting.
k. $ 4,320.00 - South side Adopt-A-Tree in front of Single Family Res.
----------
$40,983.00 Total (Not including Watering Truck)
RECOMMENDATION
Staff does not recommend items (a) above and would recommend the abbreviated
plan for (g) above in the amount of $2,210.00. This would reduce the
funding requested to $29,493. The implementation of (h) the Gateway feature
would depend on the County's plans to change the intersection providing
increased stacking distance.
Consideration of funding in the amount of $35 thousand is requested for the
implementation of the plan outlined above and the services of a watering
truck for Lake Ida Road.
Funding is shown in the General Capital Improvement Fund for Fiscal Year
'93-'94 for Lake Ida Road, west of Congress Avenue. Information is from the
Capital Improvement Plan Revision H 4 - June 15, 1993.
6
'.
.
,
, Agenda I tem No.:
}.GENDA REQUEST
Date: 7/29/93
Request to be placed on:' ~ Workshop Agenda
~ Regular Agenda Special Agenda
8/3/93
When:
Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much): .
Lake Ida Beautification - Congress Avenue to Military Trail
ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO
Recommendation: Commission consideration
Department Head Signa ture: ~Al!A ~ QJ\ I
t)~
Determination of Consi6tency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all iteas involving expenditure
of funds):
Funding available:~ NO tJ jtl (if applicable)
Funding alternatives:
Account No. & Description:
Account Balance:
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: r!Y NO rl
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action: Approved/Disapproved
"
.
{7" I
[ITY DF DElRAY IEAEM
100 N.W. 1st AVENUE . DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 . 407/243-7000
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T.?Harden, city Manager
FROM: ~~obert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: WORKSHOP ITEM - MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE
DATE: July 29, 1993
BACKGROUND
Per City Commission direction staff has obtained a survey of the
immediate area surrounding the existing clubhouse and we have
conducted two public meetings to obtain input on needs and wants
regarding a clubhouse. A detailed summary report outlining
consensus on various issues is attached. Staff and the Golf
Course Manager will be available before and during the meeting
to answer questions.
We are now seeking direction from Commission concerning the
following:
1. Market/Economic Analysis Study.
2. Method for design and construction.
A. Traditional method under consultant's Competitive
Negotiation Act; or
B. Design Build.
3 . Verification of Winter 1994 completion date.
It is estimated that an economic/market analysis would cost
around $10,000. Also, if Commission wishes to try the
Design/Build approach, it is my understanding that we would need
to change our ordinance.
Recommendation
It is my recommendation that we proceed with the market/economic
analysis and try a design/build approach for this project.
RAB:kwg
Attachments
THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS vJS J~
287.055 Ac . 't' f .
8ngl' . qUISI Ion 0 professional architectural
neenng I d h' '
aurveyin ,.an .sca~e. .arc . Itectural, or lan~- (c) Each agency shall adapt rules ar ardinances far
gent fee 9 ser~l<:es, defmltl.ons, procedures; contm- the award af design-build cantracts, For mUnicipalities,
. s prohibited; penaltles.- palitical subdivisians, schaal districts, and schaal
baards, such procedures shall include as a minimum the
(h) A "d' b old f' " ' follawing:
, eSlgn- UI Irm means a partnership, car- 1. The preparatian af a design criteria package far
poratlan, or ather legal entity which: the design and canstructian af the public canstructian
1, Is certlfted under s, 489.119 to. engage in con- ' t
t t' th h 'f' d ' proJec '
rac Ing roug" a certl Ie or registered general can- 2 The qualificatian and selectian af no. fewer than
tractar or a certified or registered bUlldl[lg Gantractar as thr~e design-build firms as the mast qualified, based an
the qualifYing agent; or ", 'I b'I' d t k f th f'
2 I tT d d 471 023 t - 't ff the qualiflcatlans, aval a Ilty, an pas wor a e Irms,
, S cer I Ie un, er s" a prac Ice or to. a er including the partners or members thereat.
to practice engineering; certified under s, 481.219 to. 3 The riteria racedures and standards far the
practice ar to. affer to. practice architecture; or certified ' , c , ,P,' ,
nder S 481 319 t t' t ff t ' t' I d evaluatlan af deSign-bUild cantract prapasals ar bids,
u ' , a prac Ice ar a a er a prac Ice an - ,,'
scape architecture, ' based an price, technical, and deSign aspects af the
(i) A "design-bUild can tract" means a single can. public canstructlan project, weighted far the proJect.
tract with a design-build firm for the design and can- 4. The sallcltatlan af campetltlve prapasals, pursu-
structian af a public canstructian praject ant to a deSign criteria package, from thase quallfted
(j) A "design criteria package" mean~ cancise, per- design-build firms and the evaluatian af the respanses
formance-ariented draWings or specificatlans af the or bids submitted by thase firms based an the evalua-
public canstructian project. The purpase of the design tlan Criteria and pracedures established prlar to. the
solicltatlan af campetltlve prapasals,
criteria package is to. furnish sufficient informatlan sa as 5. For cansultatian with the emplayed or retained
to. permit design-build firms to. prepare a bid or a design criteria prafessianal cancerning the evaluatian af
respanse to. an agency's request far prapasal, ar to per- the responses or bids submitted by the design-bUild
mit an agency to enter into a negotiated design-build firms, the supervision or approval by the agency of the
contract. The design criteria package shall specify such detailed working drawings of the project; and for evalua-
performance-based criteria far the public construction tion af the compliance of the project construction with
project, including, but not limited to, the legal descrip- the design criteria package by the design criteria profes.
tion of the Site, survey Informatian cancerning the site, sian a!.
interiar space requirements, material quality standards, 6, In the case of public emergencies, for the agency
schematic layauts and canceptual design Criteria af the head to. declare an emergency and autharlze negatia.
praject, cast or budget estimates, design and canstruc- tians with the best qualified design-build firm available
tian schedules, site develapment requirements, proVI- at that time.
sians far utilities, storm water retentian and dispasal,
and parking requirements, as may be applicable to. the
project.
(k) A "design criteria professional" means a firm who.
halds a current certificate af registratian under chapter
481 to. practice architecture ar landscape architecture or
a firm who. holds a current certificate as a registered
engineer under chapter 471 to. practice engineering and
who is emplayed by or under can tract to. the agency for
the providing af professianal architect services, land-
scape architect services, ar engineering services in can-
nectian with the preparatian of the design criteria pack-
age,
(10) APPLICABILITY TO DESIGN-BUILD CON-
TRACTS.-
,(a) Except as provided in this subsectian, this sec-
tlan IS nat applicable to. the pracurement af design-build
cantracts by any, agency, and any such agency shall
award deSign-build cantracts in accardance with the
procurement laws, rules, and ardinances applicable to.
the agency,
(b) The design criteria package shall be prepared
and sealed by a design criteria prafessianal emplayed
by arretained by the agency, If the agency elects to.
enter Into. a professional services cantract for the prepa-
ra~lan af the design criteria package, then the design
criteria professianal shall be selected and cantracted
with in accordance with the requirements af subsec-
tlans (4) and (5). A design criteria prafessianal who. has
been selected to. prepare the design criteria package
shall nat be eligible to. render services under a design-
bUild can tract executed pursuant to. the design criteria
package,
"
.
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
REPORT
PUBLIC MEETINGS
I. GENERAL
Two public meetings were held to obtain input for the
development of a golf course clubhouse. One meeting was held on
July 8, 1993, at the Municipal Golf Course and was primarily
directed to the golfers. Approximately 70 people attended. The
second meeting was held on July 12, 1993, in the City Commission
Chambers for the general public. Approximately 40 people
attended. Both meetings followed the same general format, with
input being obtained on the cart shed, pro shop, locker rooms,
bag storage, and dining facilities. In most cases, general
consensus on each item was reached. A summary of the meetings
and general consensus follows.
II. MEETING - MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE (JULY 8)
A. Cart Storage - It was the general opinion that the
existing cart storage area was adequate to meet our needs and
that the existing structure should be utilized, i.e., not build
a new cart storage area. It was felt that this structure should
remain separate from the main building, possibly adding a
covered bag drop-off area and closing in the sides.
B. Bag Storage - It was generally felt that bag
storage was adequate but should be expanded to accommodate those
on the waiting list.
C. Pro Shop - It was the general consensus that a
full-service pro shop be maintained carrying a variety of items
but increase the display area, add office space and storage
space, and reconfigure the counter area to improve customer
access and flow.
D. Locker Rooms - It was the general consensus that
the locker room should contain 1/2 lockers with some full
lockers, have fewer lockers than they now have based on
utilization, contain enough room for card tables, be handicapped
accessible, (contain enough fixtures to accommodate the use) and
contain minimal shower facilities. It was also noted that the
locker rooms should be properly maintained and cleaned more
frequently.
~
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE REPORT
PUBLIC MEETINGS
Page 2
E. Dininq Facilities - Three dining room/restaurant
options were reviewed with the group. These were: 1) a grill
room only (50 seats), 2 ) full-service dining area with bar
(200-250 seats), and 3) a full-service banquet facility, i.e. ,
dining area, bar, meeting rooms, etc.
The general consensus was for a full-service
dining area with bar, capable of being compartmentalized, with
the ability to adequately seat and service a banquet of 150-200
people, while maintaining other services, i.e. , not have to shut
down because of a banquet. The general feeling was that the
facility should be useable by civic and nonprofit organizations
for meetings and banquets and organized in such a way that you
may have 2-3 small meetings/banquets going on at the same time.
Some sentiment for a small grill room was expressed but was not
the consensus of the group.
F. Financial Issues - It was generally felt that the
facility should be planned and sized in such a way as to not
raise fees considerably, nor eliminate continued capital
improvements due to the debt load of a new clubhouse.
G. Other Issues - Questions were raised concerning
the feasibility of remodeling the existing facility, as well as
concerns about fees and tee times. Fees and tee time issues
were not addressed, information about cost and feasibility of
renovating the old building was discussed.
In addition, the need for a marketing analysis to
determine size of facility and type was discussed. There was no
clear consensus on the need for this study, however, all felt
that the facility should be self-supporting. The Assistant City
Manager felt there was a need for this study.
No clear consensus was reached on a method of
proceeding with the project, although the consensus was that
some sort of bid process be followed.
III. MEETING - CITY HALL (JULY 12)
A. Cart Storaqe - No real thoughts were expressed
other than that the existing cart shed seemed adequate to meet
our needs. Opinions were expressed to look at economics of
electric versus gas carts.
B. Baq Storaqe - General consensus after discussion
by the Assistant City Manager was to expand the space to meet
needs and handle people on the waiting list.
C. Pro Shop - General consensus was to maintain a
full-service pro shop, somewhat larger with adequate customer
service area.
"
'.
- .
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE REPORT
PUBLIC MEETINGS
Page 3
D. Locker Rooms - General consensus was to have a
locker room with a number of lockers sufficient to meet needs,
mixture of 1/2 and full lockers, and with adequate shower and
restroom facilities.
E. Dining Facilities - The three options, as noted
above, were reviewed. The general consensus was to have a
full-service dining area with a bar, configured in such a way as
to have multiple uses, with seating capacity in the 200-300
range. However, there also was a large minority opinion that
the City should have a banquet facility in the 300-400 seating
range. A majority felt that a marketing study should be
performed to determine what type and size of facility could be
supported in the market place and what was financially feasible.
F. Financial Issues - It was the consensus that the
debt for the facility should be supported by fees, not by tax
dollars. It was also suggested that a financial study of the
course be performed by a third party to determine financial
capability, and then plan a clubhouse based on financial ability
to pay.
G. Other Items - Although not a consensus, it was
suggested that the restaurant operation be leased out. There
was general support to conduct an economic and marketing
analysis to determine ultimate dining size.
IV. OTHER QUESTIONNAIRE
Questionnaires were distributed at both meetings and
were made available at the golf course. To date, only 43 have
been returned. An analysis of the questionnaire has not been
performed.
RAB:Kwg
FOLDER: GOLF/MISC
FILE:Report
"
., . - I
(J..))~ rr'/
-' ~f~'
J- ,~
[ITY DF DELAAY BEA[H
100 N,W, 1st AVENUE . DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 . 407/243-7000
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
FROM: pYRobert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC MEETING DATES/MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE
DATE: June 22, 1993
Public Forum meeting dates have been set with the golfers and
the general public for the purpose of obtaining input on Club
House/Restaurant needs. A summary of these meetings will be
prepared and reviewed with City Commission at the August 3rd
Workshop. The meeting schedule is as follows:
Thursday, July 8th, 7:00 p.m. - Golf Course Club House
(Golfers)
Monday, July 12th, 7:00 p.m. - Commission Chambers
(General Public)
Commissioner Ellingsworth asked that Commissioners be
informed of this schedule.
RAB:mld
c: David Kovacs
Brahm Dubin
THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS
"