01-07-92 Special/Workshop
.
,
,
(
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA - CITY COMMISSION
SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING - JANUARY 7, 1992 - 6:00 P.M.
FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
-
. AGENDA
Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision
made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered
at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record
of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which
record includes the testimony and evidence upon whi ch the appeal is
to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record.
Pursuant to Section 3.07 of the City Charter of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, Mayor Thomas E. Lynch has instructed me to advise
you of a Special Meeting of the Commission to be held in the First
Floor Conference Room at 6 P.M. on Tuesday, January 7, 1992.
This meeting has been called for the purpose of considering
the following:
1. Options on Pineapple Grove Way Landscaping Project.
2. Consider waiving bond requirement associated with the award of
bid for the Tennis Center Lighting Project to Ledbetter
Electric.
~~~JlrWit
Alison MacGregor Harty
City Clerk
WORKSHOP AGENDA
1. Sea Turtle Conservation Program.
2. Status Report - Beach Renourishment Project.
3. Status Report - All American City Application.
4. Waiver of Permitting, Land Use Application and Stage Rental Fees
for Charitable or Non-profit Organizations.
5. Proposed Police Legal Advisor Position.
6. Discussion and direction with regard to converting the Veteran's
Park Master Lift Station to an in-line Booster Station;
associated costs and benefits.
,.
,
.
City Commission
Special Workshop Meeting
1/7/92
7. Status Report - Palm Beach Countywide Planning Council.
8. Meeting Schedule for First Quarter of 1992.
9. Commission Comments.
.
-2-
,.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ( (-0/
SUBJECT: WORKSHOP AGENDA ITEM #4 - MEETING OF JANUARY 7, 1992
PROPOSED POLICY REGARDING THE WAIVER OF FEES FOR ELIGIBLE
NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
DATE: January 3, 1992
I recommend that the City Manager be authorized to approve waiver of
stage rental fees and fees for temporary facilities such as tents and
temporary signage. Fee waivers by the City Manager would be only
authorized 'for organizations meeting the criteria outlined in Ms.
Butler's memo. I strongly recommend that we not approve a general
waiver of all developmental fees as suggested by Ms. Butler's memo.
We need the fees to pay the costs of the large amount of staff time
required to process many of the development actions listed in Section
2.4.3 (K)(l), (2) and (3) of the LDR's.
The City Attorney should advise whether an ordinance is needed to
authorize the waivers.
'.
'.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVID HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
FROM: LULA BUTLER, DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMEN$
RE: PROPOSED POLICY REGARDING THE WAIVER OF FEES FOR ELIGIBLE
- ---
NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
DATE: DECEMBER 31, 1991
ITEM BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION:
- --
Consideration of proposed policy governing the waiver of fees for
eligible, non-profit or service organizations. Staff is
proposing that such policy be administered by the City Manager
via the direction of the City Commission.
BACKGROUND:
By consensus, the City Commission has directed staff to develop a
policy for their consideration regarding the waiver of fees for
non-profit organizations. Currently, there is no provision for
waiving fees of any nature except as approved by the Ci ty
Commission on a request-by-request basis. In recent months,
several requests for waivers have been considered by the
Commission ranging from for-profit businesses to non-profit
groups, requesting relief from development application and
building permit fees and service groups for special event or
seasonal activities. Therefore, staff is proposing the following
criteria and definition of organizations that would be considered
for waivers, which would provide direction by which the City
Manager may waive specific fees upon request from eligible groups
if approved by the City Commission as follows:
Non-profit organizations currently receiving a portion of
their annual operating budget from the United way and/or the
City of Delray Beach.
Service organizations who elect to sponsor and participate
in special event and/or fund-raising activities that are of
benefi t to the general public. For this purpose, eligible
organizations must provide in writing the extent of their
involvement with proposed activity. A group's physical
presence (active participation) during the event is
required.
'.
.
Proposed Policy on Fee Waivers
December 31, 1991
Page 2
Fees, for this purpose, are those defined under Section 2.4.3
(K) (1) Development Applications and Section 2.4.3 (K) (2) & (3),
Building Plan Check fees and Building Permit fees. We would
recommend that the value of fees waived be considered as part of
the City's contribution to the non-profit organization upon a
request during the normal budget process. Staff would be
responsible for providing this information to the City
Commission.
Additionally, we would recommend deleting fees charged for
the use of the City's portable stage to the same group of
eligible, non-profit organizations and service organizations
as long as the use of the stage is associated with a special
event either supported by the City or is for an activity
that is of benefit to the general public. Activities
carried out at City facilities would automatically be
considered as meeting the requirements of this fee waiver
policy. We would maintain the position that such
organizations be responsible for staff over-time pay
required for setting up or taking down the equipment. The
City will endeavor to provide such services within normal
work hours, except when requested to do differently by the
sponsoring organizations. All other requests for the use of
the subject equipment would not fall under this policy.
RECOMMENDATION:
We would recommend the City Commission consider the proposed
policy regarding the waiver of fees for eligible, non-profit
organizations which provides for consideration of such waivers
within the purview of the City Manager.
LB:DQ
D12
Waiver. Fee
..
..
.
Section 2.4.3 (J)
(J) Combining of Submittal Items for Multiple Purpose
Applications:
( 1) When one project requires more than one
application (e.g. rezoning, site plan, abandonment, plat), the
information required of a Basic Submission 2.4.3(A) parts (2)
through (7) need only be provided with the initial application
provided that with each subsequent application an affidavit,
signed by the owner or designated agent, verifies that the
original information therein has not changed. Any information
which has changed must be noted and resubmitted.
(2) Each site plan application or master plan
application must provide a complete basic plan submittal,
2.4.3(B). Information required by subsections (C) and (D) may be
shown on the basic plan or may otherwise be combined provided
that the submittal remains clear and easy to read. Three
separate submittals may be required at the discretion of the
Director.
(K) Fees: Processing fees shall be collected for
development applications. The fees shall be as established
herein and as modified by ordinance of the City Commission.
Revised fees are normally established concurrent with adoption of
the budget for each fiscal year.
') ( 1) Development Applications: Fees associated with
,/
development applications are applicable per the following. All
fees are cumulative and separate unless otherwise indicated.
Combined applications shall provide multiple fees.
(a) Comprehensive Plan Amendment $ 2,000
(b) Review of a ADA/DRI $ 1,000
(c) Voluntary Annexation with Zoning $ 1,000
( d) Rezoning of Land $ 900
(e) Modification of a SAD Ordinance to
add a use or uses $ 450
(f) Conditional Uses, New application $ 450
Modification requiring Board Review $ 200
Modification with Administrative Review $ 50
(g) Master Plans $ 500 ( 1)
(h) Formal review of a Sketch Plan $ 500
[Section 2.4.l(B)]
(G) (i) BLANK
....~...' [Section 2.4.l(A)]
2421
'.
.
.
Section 2.4.3 (K)
( j ) Site Plan Review, New application $ 500 (1)
(includes landscaping plans and
architectural elevations)
Modification requiring Board Review $ 500
Modification with Administrative Review $ 50
(k) Extension requests for a previously
approved conditional use or site plan
(only one fee is required if both items
are being extended for one project)
-- project has commenced construction $ 150
-- no construction $ 500
(l) Plats
Boundary Plat or Minor Subdivision $ 300
Preliminary Subdivision Plat $ 500 (1)
Final Subdivision Plat $ 1000
Combined Preliminary & Final Plat $ 1000 (1)
(m) Abandonments
Right-of-way $ 500
General Easements $ 200
Specific Easements $ 50
(n) Master Sign Program $ 100 C3D
.,",;..,....,.
,'".';.-,;
; ..'->'~'
(0) VatTancethro'ughthe Board of Adjustment
or the Historic Preservation Board $ 150
(p) Formal interpretation by the Board of
Adjustment $ 25
(q) Certificate of Appropriateness by Board (2) $ 25
(r) Certificate of Appropriateness Administrator $ -0-
(s) Request for Historic Designation $ 25
(t) Hearing before the Board of Construction
Appeals (per item) $ 25
(u) Temporary Use Request involving City
Commission action $ 100
(v) Water Service Agreement Request
-- without concurrent site plan $ 100
-- with concurrent site plan $ -0-
NOTES:
( 1) Additional fee of $100 per acre beginning at 5.01 .
and any fraction thereof, up to a maximum of .~.:."'.~-~
acres, '.~ ". .\:
~.
$3,000 per project.
(2 ) This fee shall be credited against any other processing
fee which may be applicable to the request.
2422
.
Section 2.4.3 (K) (2)
(2) Plan Check Fees: Plan Check fees are required for
a 'project whose proposed construction exceeds $20,000 and when
building plans are required by Section 105.3 of the Building
Code.
(a) The Plan Check fee shall be paid when
building plans are submitted for application
for the applicable permit. The fee shall be
equal to one-half (1/2) of the building
permit fee [see item (3)(h)]. This Plan
Check fee shall be credited to the cost of
the applicable permit at its time of
issuance.
(b) A Change to Plans or Shop Drawings Fee of $15
for the first sheet plus $1.00 per each
additional sheet shall be charged for any
Plans not submitted with the original permit
application.
(3) Permit Fees: Fees associated with permits are
applicable per the following. All fees are cumulative and
separate unless otherwise indicated. Combined applications shall
provide multiple 'fees. No permit fees are included in the
imposition of application fees.
~,.", (a) Shrub Clearing Permit:
<jJ -- one acre $ 5
-- two to five acres $ 10
-- six to ten acres $ 15
-- eleven to twenty acres $ 25
-- over twenty acres $ 25 + $l/ac
add
(b) Tree Removal Permit: $ 16.50 per
Where a tree has died due to Tree
natural causes including disease,
lethal yellowing, freezing temp.,
lightning and storms, or if the $ -0-
tree is of a prohibited species,
there shall be no permit fee even
through inspection and permit
requirements shall be met.
(c) Temporary Use, not requiring City
Commission action (eg Tents) $ 5+deposit
(d) Erection and dismantling of a
temporary structure $ 50+$50 dep
(e) Work in the Public Right-of-way $ 15
~ (f) Srdewalk Cafe Permit
~ Initial application $ 50
Annual renewal $ 50 annual
Amd. Ord. 20-91
2/26/91
2423
.1It II"
.
Section 2.4.3 (K) (3)
" )
(g) Signs and Signing
Application Fee $ 15.00
Permit Fee,
non-electric $ 1.50 I sq.ft. I face
Permit Fee, electric $ 10.00 Plus
$ 1.50 I sq.ft. I face
(h) Permits for new buildinqs and additions for the
following items. Each item requires a separate
fee:
Building Permit * Electrical Permit * Plumbing
Permit * Mechanical Permit * Roofing Permit
For permit activity valued at $1,000 or less:
-- Minimum fee of: $ 38.10
-- Plus: $ 18.50 per required
inspection
-- Plus: $ 25.00 per reinspection
(1)
-- Plus: $ 50.00 leach change of
contractor
For permit activity valued at $1,001 or more: .,
).~::t".::,
,';,t~
-- Minimum fee'of: $ 38~10 + $12~70 per each
additional $1,000 of
value, or fraction
thereof
-- Plus: $ 25.00 per reinspection
(1)
-- Plus: $ 50.00 leach change of
contractor
(i) Permits for miscellaneous items such as driveways,
fences, reroofs, pools, utility sheds, patios,
sidewalks:
For permit activity valued at $1,000 or less:
-- Minimum fee of: $ 26.55
-- Plus: $ 18.50 per required
inspection
-- Plus: $ 25.00 per reinspect ion
(1)
-- Plus: $ 50.00 leach change of
contractor
.
Amd. Ord. 20-91 . ,
2/26/91
2424
.
, .
Section 2.4.3 (K) (3)
For permit activity valued at $1,001 or more:
-- Minimum fee of: $ 26.55 + $9.25 for each
additional $1,000 of
value or fraction thereof
-- Plus: $ 25.00 per reinspect ion
( 1 )
-- Plus: $ 50.00 leach change of
contractor
NOTE (1): Reasons necessitating additional inspection
fees include, but are not limited to:
* The work, or correction to previously
inspected work, does not meet code
requirements;
* An incorrect address is on the application by
action of the applicant;
. '
* The work, or correction to previously
inspected work, is not ready for inspection
at the time specified in the application for
reinspection.
(7\,',..... (j) Permits for sub trade work including, but not
\.~ limited to: Site work * Structural Pest Control *
Underground Fuel Tanks * General Construction *
Subcontracts for General Construction
For permit activity valued at $1,000 or less:
-- Minimum fee of: $ 38.10
-- Plus: $ 18.50 per required
inspection
-- Plus: $ 25.00 per reinspection
(1)
-- Plus: $ 50.00 leach change of
contractor
For permit activity valued at $1,001 or more:
-- Minimum fee of: $ 38.10
-- Plus: $ 24.40 for each $1,000
of value or fraction
thereof
-- Plus: $ 25.00 per reinspection
-- Plus: $ 50.00 leach change of
contractor
(k) Moving of a building or structure: $ 317.60
~ (l) Demolition of a building or structure: $ 63.50
2425
.
-
Section 2.4.3 (K) (3)
(m) Drilling or Driving a Potable well: $ 60.50 )
( n) Irrigation Systems $ 60.50
plus $12.10 per $1,000 of construction
costs above $1,000
(0 ) Change-out Permits: A change-out permit is for
work' by a sub-trade contractor or qualified
owner-builder which involves the repair or
replacement of minor components. Minor components
include, but are not limited to, showers, sinks,
water heaters, air-conditioning condenser units,
air-handlers, heat strips, minor duct repair,
electrical fixtures, electrical service upgrades,
pool pumps, irrigation systems pumps and
accessories, and ceiling fans.
Value of less than $200 $ -0-
Value of $200 to $1,000 $ 35
Value greater than $1,000 per normal permit
Residential Water Heaters $ -0-
(p) Certificate of Occupancy:
-- Additional Certificates $ 63.50
-- Conditional Certificates $ 629.50 .
""",',
)~
(q) Penalty for failing to call
for a final inspection: $ 40.00
(r) Penalty where work is begun without a permit:
Where work for which a permit is required is
started or proceeded with prior to obtaining said
permit, the fees herein specified shall be
tripled. The payment of such triple fee shall not
relieve any persons from fully complying with the
requirements of this code in the execution of the
work, nor from any other penalties prescribed
herein.
(4 ) Impact and Connection Fees: Impact and connection
fees are paid at the time of issuance of a residential building
permit or at the time of connection to the water or sewer system,
as applicable.
(a) In-lieu of Park Dedication Fee (residential
development) [see Section 5.3.2(C)(1)]
$ 500 per unit
(b) Traffic Impact Fee: This fee shall be assessed
pursuant to the Palm Beach County Traffic Impact .
Fee ordinance and shall be collected by the City
at the time of issuance of appropriate building
permits.
2426
... . I .
"
~ ~,
\ \;1 I( --;j _.') r')/" ~'. I
.. 1,) , \' I (,."" ,/ ~-'f 1ft
/"-'C C -C~ ." . t--< L'~ /V'1::v'-'-~\
'\ [". . ~ -...? ,! '
>~ lJ""~,y__J\0 '>7~l:'-'2-. {,.?~,<< j
. ..~ ~'tf h, 'Lv. ~f- fr."-.- ,/
/1'" i' ,f;-' (', / / ' "
'_~~,+"i~? ,r<..~ \'.x:."7-~"~' ,,(/ -t"~
I' -rr,' ( .
t tv-,\ . ti':/Lt- y... "--'7 ,. ~r'''r!';J--'L-. .~ L Ju...0< '&--
c, '\, ,C-j', / > " 0
. \,\,,',., " L ".
: - \ / -' - .,.-~:..?- - /-_.~; - - "
c<-,;v~ ,,) ",,/"'<-. [L.(; J --t~, t~~vX;\
('i' ,Cr. '/.. " 'L
' c '-e, {V--\..) k" :Y"""~~v~ i"~/.L,r:'~i ~ '
+, ( ri\ I Ie;:' 1 '
cv~ ~v~ c ,,;~~\ ,~ lllV f},;:cl ~ 1~0.L .
') " J' 1\ ;\ ,"
~- r 1 f', '. , --11 J ....,--,.._-.... -0;
- -/ \ . .', iI,
/jt"",,~,+ ./l<2~-cYv\Afl\J(.v-_. \ ../ j;~'J L....." ~ I. ~V-
'/ "'\" r"
'" \ _ _ 'j , : \ I
"'l~!v-tu-?... C. ~.....5<.... ~ ~?'-^-\..~ .: t cc..-Z. \
./,. . ~ /:.. ':t(:\ .
',! ~-' ~'I Ii ,i
(~~~~~)' 'Lv~ f~ L'1 7r l'<'-J:~ S) ~~~"
n t; I' " .' ,}. --rJ
.I,}-T.;.('\..J.....+ I~~, c.,k.:' V'--<i/t' +.., I~K..
~ ' r, t
: If' d~ (~'i-P~ C'cy 'c"~~ -1 f/f-
.~~Li_W~ ~~rf;", fv.....yJ.4;f ,tV"(..~/,l J-j:tJ-
n " (^ -0.. r - l--tr \) .~ :J J
i (~~,,~ {L{.l'-t;v;t.--f;~ -'\~ ,rJ*!-<,
;' 4,(/<)(1) P,)~ (3) 7, ~~ L /) I!.~ ':',
10 'V ' 1'l\,' /' "\ L" 1hill
-:-f''-'. l~-J.! L>0'~~ 1~~"\CY \.~L.:-t'1.lL~,
;, ( I (\ .fr-_.. . I' ;, '-6 fi ,~
i "~v' ~<"'o,..(}............".L"'''-..-~~ -~;!.-. I__~',-~., .":',_-\.1 (.;..,~t"'iY\--tA~.XI~ (,...;rt.{.<.x.~
' / .
.,
. ..
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVID T. BARDEN
CITY MANAGER
THRU: RALPH E. HAYDEN, P.E.~j~ FROM: ROB B. TAYLOR P.E.~
CITY ENGINEER ~ ASST. CITY ENGINEER
DATE: JANUARY 7, 1992
SUBJECT: PINEAPPLE GROVE WAY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On January 6, 1992 a memo was sent to you regarding this project.
Information in that memo indicated that all three cost proposals
included damages due the contractor (ARZ) as a result of delays.
The contractor indicated this was the case in a meeting at the
City Attorney's office on January 3, 1992, and I verified it
after receiving a copy of ARZ's January 6, 1992 memo to Williams,
Hatfield and stoner. Verification was made by telephone to Mr.
George Aboujawdeh, President of ARZ.
However, this morning I received a fax from ARZ stating that
damages were not included and would be in addition to the
proposed amounts. Mr. Aboujawdeh stated that he had previously
given me the incorrect information. A copy of the fax from ARZ
is attached. Also, attached is a copy of a cost estimated
prepared by ARZ on December 7, 1991 to complete the positive
drainage project. Note that it states that the costs include all
delays, traffic and storage charges. I asked Mr. Aboujawdeh
about this and he stated that this estimate was prepared one
month ago and that the additional damages have occurred since
that time. Referencing ARZ I S memo to Williams, Hatfield and
stoner, the $ 16,050 in damages have been accumulating since
October 25, 1991, not December 7, 1991. This information would
lead me to believe that the damages between October 25, 1991 and
December 7, 1991 were included in the first estimate of $ 80,685.
The additional $ 3,075 requested in the second estimate
($ 83,760 - $ 80,685) should cover the damages for the additional
month of shut down. Mr. Aboujawdeh did state that if the city
decided to utilize ARZ to do this proj ect, damage costs could
become negotiable.
Please consider this additional and revised information with
regards to this project.
RT:kt
RTDHPGW.KT
cc: Nancy Hurlbert
Nancy Davilla
Interoffice Memos: Memos to David T. Harden, City Manager
'l Q moTloniD R-PPfTJuE fH.foy;j}huc #1 (/oSI1IU6 fJe9//7hGE)
F1 e: 91-79 (D) A '
IftSSSD If - 0
@ DEFEe 002/51011 017 &/771311C70G 70 1/1'f/9;;;L -/-0 pllow moe6
.hms -10 ()E96h~7E w/l-/) /JeZ
,.
. .
ARZ BUILDERS INC.
General Construction
LIe #CBC 036305
Jan. .
Mr. Rob Taylor.
Enviromental Services.
434 S. Swinton Ave.
Delray beac 3444
RE: Pineapple Grove Way
Dear Mr. Taylor,
Attached please find a transmittal hand delivered to W.H.S.
The damages are $16,050.00 as identified on the front page.
The three pro:p.")sals reflect only the cost of construction.
The total cost of every proposal does not include any cost for dan~ges.
Please l'evise accordingly. ---
Sincerely,
ARZ U!LDERS INC.
---
G rge Aboujawdeh
P'esident
14413 SW. 25th AvenuE', #A-22 . 8oYr)lon Beach, Flo';da :1:3426 . (40;') 36!-/.077Cl
--------.-... - __< ___ "__. ._n_ _ _ _ _._ _ ,____ _
..
,.
.
.'
TRANSMITTAL
PINEAPPLE GROVE WAY
JANUARY 6, 1992
TO: WILLIAMS HATFIELD AND STONER
NANCY LEE HURLBERT
1325 S. CONGRESS AVE. SUITE 118
BOYNTON BEACH, FL. 33.26
FROM: ARZ BUILDERS, INC.
Please tind enclosed three proposals for the a.bove
referenced project. as requested. These proposals reflect
positive drainaqe, ditch bottom inlets, and reverse curb ~nd
gutter.
The plans for the curb and gutter approach does not in~icate
on how the monuments will fit on the islands. It was
mentioned in the mee~inq on Friday, January 3, at the City
Attorney offfice that monuments will be adjustod on site. I
just want to let you know that some of these monuments need
to be looked at before making this decision.
This is ARZ's damaqes as requested per our meeting:
Project is stopped OD october 25, 1991 (75 Days).
Labor and material tor Traffic and Barricades $8,000.00
Labor to clean washe4 dirt oft asphalt $3,750.00
Demobilization $3_500.00
TOTAL $16,050.00
It was also prom!sec1 in the meeting that UZ will b.
compensated for the work to this 4ate. Invoioe No.2 was
delivered to WH8 an4 the chock should be ready on Priday,
January 10.
For the record, ARZ bas been working with tbe City ot Delray
on this project with good faith. We prepared cost estimates
as requested and helped the enqineer and City
representatives on I1U1l.rous occasions to resolve problems.
We would like to continue this work and finish this
important project. A.1l lilY subcontraotors and store owners
on NE 2nd Ave. are asking me continuosly on status.
Please review the attache~ And advise on the route tho city
would like to take.
.~ ... -., -_.. .. .... .--. '. . ~_... ......... -, ._, ,-- -'. -_. -
"
.
.
,
REVISED COST ESTIMATE
PINEAPPLE GROVE WAY
1. POSITIVE DRAINAGE 1/6/1992
UNIT
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
SAWCUT EXISTING 15"
AND 18" TO INSTALL BASINS 11 EA 300 $3,300.00
CORE EXISTING BASINS 2 EA 350 $700.00
REMOVE EXIST. CONe. WALK 140 SY 7.5 $1,050.00
REMOVE EXIST PAVEMENT 400 SY 10 $4,000.00
REMOVE NEW CURB 130 LF 7 $910.00
NEW CONe. WALK 140 SY 12 $1,680.00
ASPHALT RESTORATION 400 SY 21 $8,400.00
NEW TYPE D CURB 130 LF 9 $1,170.00
TYPE P-10 INLET 10 EA 1350 $13,500.00
TYPE J-IO INLET 5 EA 1780 $8,900.00
TYPE P-V INLET 2 EA 1500 $3,000.00
TYPE J-V INLET 5 EA 1975 $9,875.00
MH-P7T 1 EA 1150 $1,150.00
12" eMP 500 LF 19 $9,500.00
15" RCP 197 LF 32 $6,304.00
SOIL TESTS 1 LS 450 $450.00
TRAFFIC SAFETY/MOBILZATION 1 LS 6200 $6,200.00
BOND 1 LS 1660 $1,660.00
ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION 1 LS 2680 $2,680.00
=~~==;=~=~~=---~~=;==~:=;~~=~=~=~==;=~=~-~~=-;~~=-~~~~~==~~-~~~;=~~=;
SUBTOTAL + $84,429.00
2" PVC 10 LF 4.9 $49.00
3" PVC 10 LF 5 $50.00
APPROVED ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION 1 LS 2680 $2,680.00
(EAST SIDE)
ADDITONAL SCULPTURE BASES 2 EA 450 $900.00
PURCHASE PVC 1 LS 48 $48.00
~=====-=;==~==~-=========~=====:===;~==--=====~==~==~==============~=
SUBTOTAL + $3,727.00
CREDIT FOR 4" pvc TO DELRAY BEACH - $4,396.00
TOTAL $83,760.00
:':!!:===-=:=~~==.-::':!~~
- .. "'- _.. .... --, .... -., ...- -, ..-., _.-. -, --
'.
"
.
REVISED COST ESTIMATE
PINEAPPLE GROVE WAY
2. DITCH BOTTOM INLET 1/6/1992
UNIT
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNI'!' PRICE COST
SAWCUT EXISTING 15"
AND 1B" TO INSTALL BASINS 11 EA 300 $3,300.00
CORE EXISTING BASINS ~ EA 350 $700.00
REMOVE EXIST. CONe. WALK 140 SY 7.5 $1,050.00
REMOVE EXIST PAVEMENT 400 SY 10 $4,000.00
REMOVE NEW CURB 130 LF 7 $910.00
NEW CONC. WALK 140 5Y 12 $1,680.00
ASPHALT RESTORATION 400 Sy 21 $8,400.00
NEW TYPE D CURB 130 LF 9 $1,170.00
TYPE C INLET 15 EA 1300 $19,500.00
TYPE E INLET 1 EA 1500 $1,500.00
TYPE H INLET 6 EA 1500 $9,000.00
MH-P7T 1 EA 1150 $1,150.00
12" CMP 500 LF 19 $9,500.00
15" Rep 197 LF 32 $6,304.00
SOIL TESTS 1 LS 450 $450.00
TRAFFIC SAFETY/MOBILZATION 1 1S 6200 $6,200.00
BOND 1 LS 1660 $1,660.00
ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION 1 LS 2680 $2,680.00
~_=~====%~~~=~~~~==;_~~~~~=====~~~=__====~=~=__;=~~~~~==~=~~~~~~_=~K~
SUBTOTAL + $79,154.00
2" PVC 10 LF 4.9 $49.00
3" PVC 10 LF 5 S50.00
APPROVED ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION 1 LS 2680 $2,680.00
(EAST SIDE)
AODITONAL SCULPTURE BASES 2 EA 450 $900.00
PURCHASE PVC 1 LS 48 $48.00
~=~:~~===~_ae~~=_~~~~~~=_~~e==;====~~~=_====~~=~~=_~a=~~~;=._~~~~e~=_
SUBTOTAL + $3,727.00
CREDIT FOR 4" PVC TO DELRAY BEACH - $4,396.00
TOTAL $78,485.00
----------------
-------------
. ._-- ---.- _.--
'.
,.
COST ESTIMATE
PINEAPPLE GROVE WAY
3. REVERSED CURB AND GUTTER 1/6/1992
UNIT
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
REMOVE EXIST. D CURB 225 LF $7.00 $1,575.00
NEW D CURB 850 LF $9.00 $7,650.00
NEW DROP CURB 50 LF $10.00 $500.00
61x18" CONC. TRENCH SLAB 850 LF $15.00 $12,750.00
IRON GRATES 150 LF $115.00 $17,250.00
CONCRETE BANDS 50 LF $9.00 $450.00
REMOVE PAVEMENT 190 SY $10.00 $1,900.00
SOIL TESTS 1 LS $200.00 $200.00
TRAFFIC SAFETY/MOBILIZATION 1 LS $4,500.00 $4,500.00
BOND 1 LS $1,200.00 $1,200.00
ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION 1 LS $2,680.00 $2,680.00
=~===~~~~_5~___~_~=~~:~~mc=_~w===~~~~D~__;;~=~~~=~~=-~=~~=~~~~=~~==
SUBTOTAL + $50,655.00
2" PVC 10 LF 4.9 $49.00
3" PVC 10 LF 5 $50.00
APPROVED ADDITINAL DEMOLITI 1 LS 2680 $2,680.00
(EAST SIDE) $0.00
ADDITTONAL SCULPTURE BASES 2 EA 450 $900.00
PURCHASE PVC 1 LS 48 $48.00
________====~=mc~___;~~~~~~:s=__~~~~==~=;__~~~~~~~~~~~-;~=~~=~=~~~~
SUBTOTAL + $3,727.00
CREDIT FOR 4"PVC - $4,396.00
TOTAL $49,986.00
THIS ESTIMATE IS STRICTLY PER WILLIAMS HATFIELD AND STONER'S
PROPOSED QUANTITIES (SEE ATTACHED)
IRON GRATES ARE MANUFACTURED AS 2 FT LONG BY 20 INCHES WIDE
ESTIMATE DOES NOT CONSIDER ANY SIDEWALK DAMAGES OR RESTORATION
- ----- ....-... . ....---...-- . ..-..-..... ..---.. . .."---,.- .---.". -
'.
,.
I C'" (-.
I
REVISED COS~ ESTIMATE
PINEAPPLE GROVE WA~
12/7/199
I UNrT
DESCRIPTION QUANTIT~ UNIT PRICE COST
I
I -. -
SAWCUT EXISTING 15"
AND 18" TO lNSTALL BASINS 11 EA 250 $2,750.00
CORE EXISTING BASINS 2 EA 350 $700.00
REMOVE EXIS'l'. CONe. WALK 90 bY 7.5 $675.00
REMOVE EXIS'!' PAVEMENT 350 SY 10 $3,500.00
R,EJMOVE NEW CURB 130 LF 7 $910.00
NEW CONCa WALK 90 S'l 12 $1,090.00
ASPH~L'l\ RES'l'ORATION 350 SY 21 $7,350.00
NEW T'tPE 0 CURB 130 LF 9 $1,170.00
TYPE P-10 lNLET . 10 EA 1350 $13,500.00
TYP~ J-10 INLET 5 BA 1780 $H,900.00
TYPE P-V INLET 2 1':1\ 1500 $3,000.00
TYPE ;I-V INLET 5 EA 1975 $9,875.00
MH-P7rl' i 1 EA 1150 $1,150.00
12" eMP 500 LF 19 $9,500.00
15" RCP 197 LF 32 $6,304.00
SOIL TESTS 1 IS 450 $450.00
TRAFFIC SAfETY/MOBILZATION lLS 6200 $6,200.00
BOND 1 LS 1660 $1,660.00
ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION 1 LS 2680 $2,GBO.OO
~~~;~~===~~========-~===~~~=~=~c===~===:=ze=~~~~==~_~==c=~====m_~__
SUBTOTAL + $81,354.00
2" PVC 10 LF 4.~ $49.00
3" PVC 10 LF 5 $50.00
APPROVED ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION lLS 2680 $2,680.00
(EAST SIDE)
ADDITONAL SCULPTURE ,BASES 2 EA. 450 $900.00
PURCHASE ~VC lLS 48 $48.00
===~~=~m~==~~===_====~====~e~==__~==___=;==Q':===-C===_~----a~__~===~
SUBTOTAL + $31727.00
CREDrT FOR 4" PVC TO DELRA'i BE..ACH $4,:396.00 .
-
TOTAL $BO,685.00
~==__"a=====....1CI
THESE NUI1BERS INCLUDE ALL DELAY, TRAFFIC AND STORAGE CHARGES
.
'.
.,
..
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONHENTAL SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVID T. BARDEN
CITY HANAGER
TBRU: RALPH E. HAYDEN ~
CITY ENGINEER
FROM: ROBERT B. TAYLOR, P.E. ul/lj
ASSISTANT ENGINEER fA~
DATE: JANUARY 6, 1992
SUBJECT: PINEAPPLE GROVE WAY - DRAINAGE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
As requested, staff with the assistance of Williams, Hatfield,
and stoner (WHS), has prepared information for consideration in
resolving the drainage problem on this project. As you may
recall, the original plan of using 4" PVC drain pipes to allow
runoff to pass through the landscape nodes did not work due to
some incorrect assumptions regarding the curb height along
Pineapple Grove Way. Since that time, staff, WHS and the
contractor (ARZ) have been working to resolve the problem.
Outlined below is information regarding three alternative
solutions with attached cost estimates prepared by ARZ.
1. A Positive underground drainage system with all curb inlets
can be provided by placing inlets at each node and by tying
into the existing 18" drainage pipe on the west side of
Pineapple Grove Way. The contractor (ARZ) has provided an
estimate to perform this work in the amount of $ 83,760.00.
This amount includes all damages ($ 16,050.00) ARZ has
incurred as a result of delays in the proj ect. Based on
independent cost estimates performed by the Environmental
Services Department and WHS the ARZ estimate appears to be
valid. If this alternative is chosen it may take 3-4 weeks
for the specially fabricated structures to be completed and
delivered.
2. positive underground drainage system with curb inlets on the
east side of Pineapple Grove Way and ditch bottom inlets on
the west side of pineapple Grove Way. This is a slight
modification of (1) Using a slightly less expensive
structure to tie into the 18" storm sewer on the west side
of the street. The total cost of this alternative is
estimated at $ 78,485.00, however, the final produc~ is less
desirable than that attained by 1. This price includes the
1 of 2
'.
,.
'"
$ 16,050.00 in damages previous noted. There would be a
visible inconsistency between the drainage structure on the
east and west sides of the street, and minimal water ponding
curbside of the ditch bottom inlet grates.
3. Reversed Curb and gutter with solid iron grate cover at
pedestrian crossings. By placing a trench gutter between
the existing curb and the landscape nodes, runoff could
follow the existing course of drainage towards the
intersections where it is collected in existing inlets. ARZ
has given a cost estimate of $ 49,986.00 to perform this
work. Again, this includes the $ 16,050.00 in damages
previously noted.
It is important to note that none of the three alternatives
discussed will completely eliminate all of the ponding which
occurred prior to the construction of the landscape nodes. To
accomplish this would require regrading of the street in some
areas. The main objective is to not create new or increased
drainage problems as a result of the construction of the nodes.
It is also important to note that if the City decides not to
utilize the current contractor, ARZ, there may still be damage
charges owed (estimated at $ 16,050.00), additional time delays
for rebidding/contract negotiation, and the inconvenience of
dealing with multiple contractors.
If you require additional information regarding this project
please call me at extension 7337.
RT:kt
RTDHJ6.kt
cc: Nancy Hurlbert
Nancy Davilla
David Tolces
2 of 2
'.
,. ,]"AH DE,' '32 11:04
407-738-6157 WHS BB 543 F'C12
. -
~~'
".....-. \. .
(\~ ~ \, ;:>' '
TRANSMITTAL ,d\\'"-",,
~(_."",
PINEAPPLE GROVE WAY (-',.,\ -~,..,
" ~"\ "j,' '
J'ANUARY 6, 1992 vS~,\,-:'~:~:\<::' ~\-.
\' .., \' ..' \(j
."', ',-~' ~
~\\ \\ "., ..' . " ,~,
:, '(..',-" ,
"''),J
TO: WILLIAMS HATFIELD ANn STONER ,-_.,~.\.,;."" ."
'. ~'.f' \ (j.\
NANCY LEE HURLBERT . ' ,,~~-:\'';>'~-(W
1325 S. CONGRESS AVE. SUITE 118 ,,:;.~~;v
BOYNTON BEACH, FL. 33426
~
FROM: ARZ BUILDERS, INC...s..---~.-' ;' ." .
/
Please rind enclosed three proposals for the above
rererenoed project as requested. These proposals reflect
positive drainage, ditch bottom inlets, and reverse ourb and
gutter.
The plans for the curb and gutter approach does not indicate
on how the monWftents will :fit on the islands. It was
mentioned in the meeting on F~idaYI January 3, at the city
Attorney offfioe that monuments will be adjusted on site. I
just want to let you know that some of these monuments need
to be looked at be:fore making this decision.
This is ARZ1s damages as requested per our meeting:
Projeet is stopped on Ootober 25, 19~n ( 75 Days).
Labor and material for Traffic and Barricades $8,800.00
Labor to elean washed dirt off asphalt $3,750.00
Demobilization $3,500.00
TOTAL $16,050.00
It was also promised in the meeting that ARZ will be
compensated for the work to this date. Invoioe NO.2 was
delivered to WHs and the check should be ready on Friday,
January 10.
For the record, A~z has been working with the city of Delray
on this p~oject with good faith. We prepared cost ~stimates
as requested and helped the engineer and city
representatives on numerous ocoa.sions t.o resolve problems.
We would like to continue this work and finish this
important project. All my subcontractors and store 01t7ners
on NE 2nd Ave. are asking me continuosly on status.
Please review the attached and advise on the route the City
would like to take.
'.
.. 543 F'CC ,.JRtJ C1Eo' '3:2 11 : (,T::,
407-738-5157 WHS BB
.
.
REVISED COST ESTIMATE
PINEAPPLE GROVE WAY
1. POSITIVE DRAINAGE 1/6/1992
UNIT
DESCR.IPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
SAWCUT EXISTING 15"
AND l8" TO INSTALL BASINS 11 EA 300 $3,300.00
CORE EXISTING BASINS 2 EA 350 $700.00
REMOVE EXIST. CONC. WALK 140 SY 7.5 $1,050.00
REMOVE EXIST PAVEMENT 400 SY 10 $4,000.00
REMOVE NEW CURB 130 LF 7 $910.00
NEW CONe. WALK 140 SY 12 $1,680.00
ASPHALT RESTORATION 400 SY 21 $8,400.00
NEW TYPE 0 CURB 130 LF 9 $1,170.00
TYPE P-10 INLET 10 EA 1350 $13,500.00
TYPE J-10 INLET 5 EA 1780 $8,900.00
TYPE P-V INLET 2 EA 1500 $3,000.00
TYPE J-V INLET 5 EA 1975 $9,875.00
MH-P7T 1 EA 1150 $1,150.00
1211 CMP 500 LF 19 $9,500.00
15" ReF 197 LF 32 $6,304.00
SOIL TESTS 1 LS 450 $450.00
TRAFFIC SAFETYjMOBILZATION 1 LS 6200 $6,200.00
BOND 1 LS 1660 $1,660.00
ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION 1 LS 2680 $2,680.00
~--=~~~;-~=~~~-~~~~~~-==~~~====~~;~==~~~====~~~-==~~~=;=~~~~~=~~~====
SUBTOTAL + $84,429.00
2" PVC 10 LF 4.9 $49.00
3" PVC 10 LF 5 $50.00
APPROVED ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION 1 LS 2680 $2,680.00
(EAST SIDE)
ADDITONAL SCULPTURE BASES 2 EA 450 $900.00
PURCHASE PVC 1 LS 48 $48.00
~-==~=~-~=~~-=~=~~=-==~===~~=~~=-==~~;~==~~~~~=~~=~~===~~==~~~=~===~=
SUBTOTAL + $3,727.00
CREDIT FOR 411 PVC TO DEL'RAY BEACH - $4,396.00
TOTAL $83,760.00
-------------
----------...----
'.
4~.:::r ('-738-6157 tdHS BB 543 F'C14 ,]"AH C1t::,' '32 ll: t:y::,
-
. ~
REVISED COST ESTIMATE
PINEAPPLE GROVE WAY
2. DITCH BOTTOM INLET 1/6/1992
UNIT
DESCR.IPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
SAWCUT EXISTING 15"
AND lau TO INSTALL BASINS 11 EA 300 $3,300.00
CORE EXISTING BASINS 2 EA 350 $700.00
REMOVE EXIST. CONe. WALK 140 SY 7.5 $1,050.00
REMOVE EXIST PAVEMENT 400 SY 10 $4,000.00
REMOVE NEW CURB 130 LF 7 $910.00
NEW CONC. WALK 140 SY 12 $1,680.00
ASPHALT RESTORATION 400 SY 21 $8,400.00
NEW TYPE D CURB 130 LF 9 $1,170.00
TYPE C INLET 15 EA 1300 $19,500.00
TYPE E INLET 1 EA 1500 $1.,500.00
TYPE H INLET 6 EA 1500 $9,000.00
MH-P7T 1 EA 1150 $1,150.00
12" CMP 500 LF 19 $9,500.00
1511 RCP 197 LF 32 $6,304.00
SOIL TESTS 1 LS 450 $450.00
TRAFFIC SAFETYjMOBILZATION 1 LS 6200 $6,200.00
BOND 1 LS 1660 $1,660.00
ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION 1 LS 2680 $2,680.00
;~===~~=__c=~~~=;_~=~~~=~~=~~~~=-;=~~~=~=-==~~=;~~~=~==~-==~~~=--=~=~
SUBTOTAL + $79,154.00
2" PVC 10 LF 4.9 $49.00
311 PVC 10 LF 5 $50.00
APPROVED ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION 1 LS 2680 $2,680.00
(EAST SIDE)
ADDITONAL SCULPTURE BASES 2 EA 450 $900.00
PURCHASE PVC 1 LS 48 $48.00
~=;~_=~~==;~==~=~~_=;=e~~~=_~~~~=;~;~~=~~;;=-~~~~~--=~=~~==-==~~~==-;
SUBTOTAL + $3,727.00
CREDIT FOR 4" PVC TO DELRAY BEACH - $4,396.00
TOTAL $78,485.00
~~~.:::;--====~~~;=
.. I'"
4~~-~5~-bl~( WHb ~~ ~,4,"::' r"t::'l=' ,_I 1-;1 -'1 ....::...1'_' _.''::;:'" ...I-....l..".. r_"_'
. ' .
COST ESTIMATE
PINEAPPLE GROVE WAY
3. REVERSED CURB AND GUTTER 1/6/1992
UN I/)?
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COS'!'
REMOVE EXIST. D CURB 225 LF $7.00 $1,575.00
NEW D CURB 850 LF $9.00 $7/650.00
NEW DROP CURB 50 LF $10.00 $500.00
6"x18" CONe. TRENCH SLAB 850 LF $15.00 $12,750.00
IRON GRATES 150 LF $115.00 $17,250.00
CONCRETE BANDS 50 LF $9.00 $450.00
REMOVE PAVEMENT 190 SY $10.00 $1,900.00
SOIL TESTS 1 LS $200.00 $200.00
TRAFFIC SAFETY/MOBILIZATION 1 1,S $4,500.00 $4,500.00
BOND 1 LS $1,200.00 $1,200.00
ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION 1 LS $2,680.00 $2,680.00
----------------------------------------------~---------------------
------'""--------------.....--.......-----------------........-....-----........-----------------.......------
SUBTOTAL + $50,655.00
2" PVC 10 LF 4.9 $49.00
3 1J PV C 10 LF 5 $50.00
APPROVED ADDI/)?INAL DEMOLIT! 1 LS .2680 $2,680.00
(EAST SIDE) $0.00
ADDITTONAL SCULPTURE BASES 2 EA 450 $900.00
PURCHASE PVC 1 LS 48 $48.00
~~~=~=~~=~===~~~=-~~=~~~-;==~~~~;==~~=-~~=~~~-_:=~==-===~~~~==~~==~
SUBTOTAL + $3,727.00
CREDIT FOR 4"PVC - $4,396.00
TOTAL $49,986.00
THIS ESTIMATE IS STRICTLY PER WILLIAMS HATFIELD AND STONER'S
PROPOSED QUANTITIES (SEE ATTACHED)
IRON GRATES ARE MANUFACTURED AS 2 FT LONG BY 20 INCHES WIDE
ESTIMATE DOES NOT CONSIDER ANY SIDEWALK DAMAGES OR RESTORATION
'.
..
_" n' ..-..'....-..~ -.. - ,. ..J.
. 1oM~A~ ~ 1/ ~,7'0:~-<",
.
jt~ J~~I ~._: .~,:~ ~./ <t',' ~.
DEe 3 1 1991 .
[IT' DF DELRA' BEA[H CllY MAi~~G S OFC!()
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 200 NW 1st AVENUE . DELR~Y BEACH, F~ORIDA 3344.4
FACSIMILE 407t278~4755 Wr~ter' s Dl.rect L~ne
(407) 243-7090
MEMORANDUM
Date:Dece~~ 30, 1991 ~ -
To: City Commission
David Harden, City Manager ~
From: David N. Tolces, Assistant City Attorne~\
Subject: Bid 192-07; Tennis Center Lights
I On December 10, 1991 the City Commission accepted Ledbetter
Electric's bid for tennis center lights at the municipal tennis
courts. The contract has not b.een signed, however, as
Ledbetter Electric cannot meet the bonding requirements
contained in the contract. Thus, at this time a request is
being made by Ledbetter Electric to waive the' bonding
requirements.
An opti~the Commission may exercise is to waive the bonding
requirements on the condition that the City shall withhold all
payments to Ledbetter Electric until the project is completed
to the City's satisfaction. Without this provision, it is
recommended that the City reject Ledbetter I s bid and either
award the bid to American Lighting Maintenance in the amount of
$67,679.00, or authorize staff to rebid the project.
This item should be placed on the next City Commission agenda
for the Commission's consideration. If you have any questions,
please contact my office.
DNT:sh
cc: Joe Weldon, Director of Parks and Recreation
tennis.dnt
Con5'CnSu-s' Hpus sjpff Reu/euJ fiLL- 81D OoCLUl7Errrs CdEhC/E/lC./cs) eTC..)
0/ 8~nG BftC..IG 10 t:EGU./.-fie. mEE77n(3- on tilL( /C;:;< it fbSS/BL-E.-
Sf> / a..
.,
- ~_.. ,.,." ....~. _ ..,~...._..._~.....'. ~.',,,,,,,,'-,",-,._.....~,,,,:__,,_.,,,-.,,'~~_>...._,..~,,~....c.~. ....".....
--..- - ._.- ~ -
. I~l A.J
,
. \)I\-J- ~
. .
. .
MEMORANDUM
~QI'-' -'I OJ/--' 0Ze---
TO: Ted Glas
Purchasing Director '{ (/ e.s+-
FROM: Joe Weldon
Parks and Recreation Director ~u
SUBJECT: BID # 92-07 TENNIS CENTER LIGHTS
DATE: December 5, 1991
Attached please find the spread sheet for bid # 92-07 opened on November
22, 1991 for tennis lights at the municipal tennis courts. Attached are
two (2) letters from Thompson Engineering Consultants who are the
electrical engineer hired to prepare the lighting specification and make
recommendations for bid award. As noted, Mr. Thompson indicated that the
two; lowest bidders, Power Associates, Inc. and--,Edwards Electric
corPorations were ',non-responsive in there bids in that they did not
_, indicate what products they bid. Additionally, Mr.-Thompson indicates ~
that the third lowest bidder,- Ledbetter Electric, uses 9 less total
fixtures than any of the other manufactures and doesn I t see how the
necessary lighting level can be maintained. Mr. Thompson met with the
General Electric lighting representative, the product bid by Ledbetter
Electric, to -try and obtain -. the independent test lab report and
documentation on "t1l..e.......s;omputer- program used to generate the photometric '"'.-
report. He was' unable to obtain this information and therefore does not
recommend this bid.
Mr. Thompson recommends the bid be awarded to the 'high bidder, American
Lighting Maintenance, in the amount of $67,679.00. As you know we
specified poles that could be relocated to our new tennis center once
its location is determined. American Lighting bid as an alternate
concrete poles for a total of $57,202.00. These are not as easily
relocated as the metal poles and I concur with Mr. Thompson and
re~~ th~arded to American Lighting for $67,679.00.
Jo Weldon _
Di ctor of Parks and Recreation
-
JW:giv -- --
cc: David Harden-city Manager
REF: TENCTRLT ~ DOC
'.
,.
.
. .
"'0 I ell
(j oeo'" I
e III ... ~
;::J '" ... 0 oeo~1Il
"Cl .... 0... . 0 CI
c::: "'0 1Il"Cl 6 ell 100N.....c:::.....
eo ell (j . eo.... .0 .... Cll .....0.....00
c::: "'0 . ... c:::.o ;::J oeec-oN..;:OP.
.,..j "'0 ... .,..j to c::: ,
... < .,..j :J.c elIO-rl.........C.c-o
..c: 6 ",... "'0 <I14.J."..oU"\-.uGJ
CO -0 .0 >.....-rl -rl ;::J CO .....~Vr-r04 U)
.,..j ell 0 11I ;::J"'"'O:J .0 .. to 0 ;. III
,..J 0 0 CO lIl-rl lIl....elIM . elIO
~ . "'0 ....'tl'tl 1lI:J0..... 'tl III 1-10
~ '" 0\ 11I 'tl ;::J I:: III ....O....O'tl-o...llIo...
a:I I:: ..... ..... 1::0a:l...llIa:1..... P.~-rlO"Cl.,..jlllN
o III -0 ~ ~~lIl~:f~~IlI~~~.....~~2
.,..j ... -
1-1 ~ ..... I:: 1::9.><:1lI....;::J... Clllla:l p.-
Ill.... \0 .><: ...,...,a:I.oo... ...,elI<lIl"""':J ..... ,
e a:I o-.,..j.,..j.....~a:I.....lIlllll-l~a:I_OCl~~
<::c .... <~~.o~tOp.<a:lQOW~~~%M~
.
Ei ------ --
;::J
"'0
0 I:: III to "'0
.,..j ell a:I CO.,..j
1-1 ..., 1::.0
... ..., ..., .,..j
(f) 0 < ell :J..c:
I- ell ... a:I ...
0: ..... ..., ... >. 1-1 .,..j
W ..... III .,..j ......, ~
::> 4 CO, e.,..j .
0 .... M ..., .01-1...,"0
U ell ell ::J ;::J ~ III
... ..... ..... to 0 a:I ... III
(f) ... ,... :J Cl "'CO
III - 0 '><:lI1tO.,..ja:l
:t: H .0 . N I:: 0 r::9.><:
U(f) Z "'OU ~ .><: elI"Oa:I.oU
<IO Z ell r:: U....c.,..j.....;::Ja:I
WH W ,..JH .... <,....Q.o~tOp.
COCO I-
"
>-u..O-l e to
<IO. <I ;::J III
0: NO. CD ...,
ClI r:: '0 CD.c
-IZO'H ... ClI . ell co'"
WO~U III "'0 ... r::.,..j
OH H .,..j ..., ... .,..j ~ ~
,I- 0 Z u < .... ~
u..<IH::> 0 E. III "0
O..lC01: to ..., .a >. 1-1 ClI
III 0 ClI ;::J"''''''''Cl
::> < 0 CO lIl.,..j "'CO
>-cn u.. ..., .......,...ca:l
I-<I 0 .... ~ ClI ...,::Jr::S.><:
HI- ell 4 ..... r::Ua:l.aU
:J ,... :J o ClI ;::J a:I
U <!:I 0 - 0 ~tOlIltOP.
Z ~ Q\ r:: r::
i='(--__ . ~ .><: "O"Oa:I"'-o
I- ClI U U ... .,..j....c ..... 0 .,..j
:t: p~ - <....~.a~r::.o
<!:I.
H 0-
-I -0
S ...c
;::J .a
"0
r:: CD CD..c:
ClI a:I CO...
U "'0 t::.....
..... "'0 "'0 -rl ~
.... < ClI ~
... . ... a:I"'O
U 0 "'0 ... >..... ClI
ClI C Cl -rl"''''''''
..... CO e...c ...
W 0 "'0 'O...."O...c
~ ClI ::J :;J r:: 9
to .... ..... -tOUCO.oCll
"0 - :J ell ;::JCO
.... . ,... 0 -.>'tOlIlCDCO
CO P. ~ ~ u r:: .><:
:J .... .>' ClI"'OCO"'U
iS8 - u....c...c.....OCO
<-u.a~r::p.
(f)
Z
0
H
I-
1: a.
::> W -.
(f) U
W X
1: a. .. 'I.IJ ._0- ..~
<I 1:W ......
z ::>U (f)
-'104 I-
0: 0: Z
0 -'a. W
0 <I 1:
Z 1-0 1:
. W 0"" 0
> I-CO U
'.
.~ .~ ~__p.._ ~_.___. "_~""_""""N""-'''''''''''''''''''''''~_' ...... - ..........
__,u._.. _...__.____._..~__..__ ._-"
-'- ~ert
"h' E C HVAC 25 SEABREEZE AVE.} SUITE.' 202
. . PLUMBING _ ~ELRAY BEACH) FLORIDA' 33483
. aECTRICAt PHONE 407-274-0200 .
THOMPSON ENGINE:ERING CONSUL. TANTS FAX 407-274-0222
, .~ ., .-.: \.'''\\J '2. 1 \~~.,
iC(ECENED \"tU
DATE' II /~7 If/ .
S-~ ... ..
TIMEt 1 ~ .q ( It'],.-) J
~'
.' ,-'.
JOB NAME. -, LJ~U4"'-/..i _,"1'.-/1 ;if;, d
t '
JOB ttl
NAMEr .
COMPANY'
fAX ~l ~
--- , "
REMARKS' .
.
H
I LI
,
\ -.
.....-.. -. - "'-...'.' -.-.,._- . ..~. ...... ..,.---.... -.. .-... -.-., '.-
'Je o.re t'ro.nsMlt:ting a. toto.l of __:2. pa.ges Including'thls pO-ge. If you do not receIve
o.H of 'the po.ges c:leo.rly pleo.sE' contcc:-t us by -telephone.
SIGNED:______~.~_________ COpy .TO:___________._______~_
,.~---_..--"-~ ,-.- --_.._-_._-~--'~. ~----,.,-'-~-_... ,
I>.. .-
- - - -
. - -- - HVAC
. - - PlUMll1NG
- - - -
. - - -- ELECTRICAL
-
-
, THOMPSON ENGINEeRING CONSUL T ANTS -
.
November 26. 1991
City of Oelray Beach
Parks and Recreation Dep~rtment
50 N.W, 1st. Avenue
Delray B~ach. Florida ;33444 .
Re: Tennis Complex Lighting
Attn:' Mr. Joe Weldon. Director .
Dear Mr. Weldon:
I've reviewed the tour (4) bids taken on November 22. 1991
- tor the above proJect. and have the following comments.
,
1- Edward Electric Corp. apparently lowest bid did not
conform with the specification'in re9~rds to the
submittal requirements of section 16010. From their bid
forms I do not know what products are being bid.
Thliirefore. I recommEmd rej1ac:t.ing lhis bid. ~
'.
2. The Power Associates. apparently lh. second lowest..
bidder, did not conform with the specifications in
regards to the submittal requirements of section 16010.
On ~Q bid torm Prol'osa.l sheet.. hand writ.t.en i8"a8
sl'ecJ.zied manufacturers". Th~i._qoes not comply with
16010, "ITEMS TO BE SUBMI'I'TED WITH BIDtt. Therefore, I
racommend reject.ing this bid.
3, Ledbett.er Electric. the third lowest. bidder has &
complet.e submiss1~n as required by 8l'ecifications. My
proble~ with this submission. which 1s based on General
Electric sports lights, is that. G,~. uses nine (9) less
fixtures total than any ot the t.hree manufacturers that
were list.ed on the plans. No maint.enance factor or tilt
factor is listed on the photometric report. l'sn
reluctant to approve this, bid because I do not see how a
similar lighting level can be malnt~ined with
considerably less lumens to start. with. To approve thiSi
propo$al- . I would need t.o see lhe rTL report and
documentat.ion on t.he coml'uter~ro9ram used to generate
- the photometric report.. WlthoU~ this information. I
recommend. rejlae,tion of ..lhis-b-i-q.
4. American Lighting Maintenance CALK), the highest bidder,
is the only bid wit.h a complete submitt&l based on the
~pecification requirements. ALK indicated lhat Brooks
products questioned the concrete ~ase that was speCified
and has a mla~o from Brooks stating the base is too small.
25 SEABREEZE A VENUe. SUITE 202 DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33483
(4071 274-0200 FAX: (407) 274-0222
..
..
..
.,'-""" "-. ~ '. .. .-'"'-' _.~,,-..', . ". - ....
.-" ,"
r
,
I attempted to ca.ll BrooKs Products. Mr. Keating the .
author of the Memo is on vacation for two (2) weeks.
This Memo is contrary to information that I've received
on the required base size. Unfortunately I cannot
contir~ this al this t i m-e .
It may be prudent to ask ALH if they would provide an add
amount for the heavier bases in case it is found to be
required.
Also ALM has proposed concrete pOles with a consiaerable
deduct amount of $10,477.00. This seams like a reasonable
cost difference between the two product~. My COncern :would ,.
be that the concrete poles may not be readily relocateable.
As you recall. that was one of the design requirements. We
have had projects where it was nearly impossible to move a
direct buried concrete pole without destroying the pole.
If the plans are still current to eventually move the poles,
the concrete poles may not be a good idea. If they are not.
going to be moved in the future or if the deduct looks good
t.o you, I would accept the concrete poles for this project
and assume that just. t.he fixt.ures and soma of the poles can
be moved at a latter date if necessary.
For the above reasons. I believe t.hat. the blaSt. bid is that. of ~
ALM and it is in t.he best. interest of the Cit.y to a.ccept. t.he
bid of ALM. The only thing that. would change my opinion
would b~ if the GE submittal can prove the efficiency of
their prOduct is 50% +/- tnore than several ether
ma.nufacturers.
---.....
If you have any ques~ions ple&se call.
/;:J i r7L
Daniel E. Thompson. P.E. -r----
DET/bb
.
.__~_ ,,~~n_.'. .- . "~'.-~-"'--'" ...-... - _.- ~'.- -~-""- ._.. '-.. _.._._~.-..-_.--,--,..~......--.....~""~...~...~
TE,C nvn""" Lv -.>L-n.uI'l...l...L.1:... ,.., V 1:...') ",)UJ, I c.. c::.vc.
PLUMBING DELRAY BEACK FLORIDA 33483
ELECTRICAL PHONE 407-274-0200
THDM~SON ENGINEERING CQNSULTANTS FAX 407-274-0222
.
OATEI /2- q.. 91
..
rrME. r:; # \ ()t1/~) /II
JOB NAMEI f/;z\Oeu:x ~ :"
JOB UI
NAME: 111 j). dOE /(/EL (XJJJ
COMPANY: rJ,/rj(} Fc!>t-';;.'/' I8rtf(!../!/
FAX tt. z- t/3 - 8 c/
'. -, .~
---
,.to tell u- t!A-~t }1;{/ '~/L/ Mo!Z/rJlj(;lG
REMARKSI
, ,
/ "2, - S ~ q~
-
-
.. . ..-.. . . _..-._- _.---- . -~.- ---.-.--- _.. '-- ..... .~.
\<le o.re 1:ro.nSI"\I~tln9 0. toto.l of _____ po.ges Including thIs po.ge. If' you cia not receIve
o.l\ of 'the- PQgE'S .cleo.dy pleo.se- conto.c:t us by telephone.
SIGNED:_______~_______________________ COPY TO: _______-------- ___________________
tad 'ooss~ ""? NOSdWOH~* ~d9t:~a t 6 'va '2 t
,.
~_..~--~....,...__.,-~..~_..,.._.~.._--._--~-" .._'. - -~ ----,~ "...'--.,......_.,_.......~......_-' ~, --.~,;..,
..<>-.--.-.-
- - PLUM81NG
- - - -
. - -.. ~- - EUCTl\lCAl
-
-
. - THOMPSON ENGINEERING CONSUL rANTS
.
" "
.
December 4, 1991
City of Delray Beach
Parks and Recreation Department
50 Northwest 1st Avenue .
Del ray Beach, Florida 33444
Atten:Mr.-Joe Weldon, Director -.'-'0 -- - .-..'.-, ".....,.-
Re: Lighting of Municipal Tennis Courts
Dear Mr.. Weldon:
As you know from our previous correspondence, I had some
serious problems with the bid proposal of Ledbetter Eleotrio..
In order to help clarify some of these problems I met with Mr.
Steve Kosowsky of Power and Lighting Systems, the local G.E.
lighting representative. ". i '
Although Mr.. Kosowsky repre~ented hiS produot very well, ~
the questions I he-va still remain. Including the irregularity
of the bid sOOmi tt81 (G. E. was not listed and did not 'provide
all of the required data .in the bid,'G.E.has a policy to not
have independent lighting tests because of this we must accept
the d~given at face value. This is not fair to the other
bidders and does not give an independent starti.ng point for ,'........-
comparison. For ex~ple, we must take the manufacturers word
for it that the refleotor is 64% efficient. It may very well
be, but without the test I cannot know that.
Also, the photometrio report indicates that the
specifications and drawings are met with fewer fixtures than
specified. Because of the fact that we cannot oonfirm the test
data and that all other bidders submitted on nine (9) more
fixtures than G.E. proposes to use, I cannot approve the bid.
It is unfortunate that a good eleotrica1 contractor such
as Ledbetter used this unqualified man~facturer. I will call
you to dis~u~s this. ma era
\ -.
_." ~-- --- .
. ...- ......-
oelray T.C.\det
~5 SEABREEZE AVENUE. SUITE 202 OELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA 33483
407) 274-0200 FAX: (407) 274-0222
ZOd "00 S S.", "i NOSdWOH.L* Nd9! :,L,O ! 6 "'l7n '?' T
'"
..
_._. __~'.m_.~' _ _._ .___ _._ _ .. . ~ ..~ _.__._-_....~.__._~----,_..__..._..
~ '9 ~
: .. . Of Ughting Sy$tIms
.. . ,
. ,
.
liIllting $y:Cfm1 /)fpJrfG',fal
~ fttart C4ttP~/If .
lfem/4mltrilt. lit 2m8
12"'03-91
TO: steve Kosowsky - Powe~ Q Lightin9 syste~St Inc
COP~: .
.....'-"'\ _"c>- FROM: Mike Bauer - Product Manaqer ,:--~;,..:
SUBJECT~ powr*spot Photoma~ric Test Oa~a
steve, per our convarsation, it is not GE Lightinq systems
norm~l policy to send out tor independent photometric test
data. All of our Photometric Tes~ Programs ~ere written ~y
Bill Brackett, the owner ot ITEL. However, when we have had
outside te$ting done on our products t.he phot01lletr1cs
gen~r~lly com~ back with 2' better total efficiency and a
little higher candlepower.. So we are tougher on ourselve$
'. than the outside l~bs are. GE Liqhtinq Systems stands
'''-behind and guarantees tha photometries we publish.
rf you do have 'a spec that requires independent test data,
please feel ~ree to call and we will discuss those requests
on an job by job basis.
---
.,...~ If .you havQ any questions, let InS k.now. .....----...,..
.
Best ~~gards,
/lIk
. "\
-.
., -, ..... - ,.,....-
.
SOd .oossv . ' L R Tn:T',f;1 n P . PlJ T
'"l.NOSdWOH..L>I< Wd 9 T : L.. 0
..
, CAND.ELA TRACES GENERAL @tUCTR1C
LoWER VERTICAL 8EAM UPPER VEhrlCAL BEAM LICHTING SYSTEMS 8USINESS DEPAR.TMENT
6~OO HENDERSONVILLE, N. C. Ij,S,A.. 281)9
- hw". diu" ....J\c,'" r.p....I..I\\.tlV.
. ~o4w~t p.,,',>,..nc.. PHOTOMETRIC DATA':
'-- .
:) ~600
PER 1000 LAMP LUMENS
w
0 lUMINAIRE
Z 4!l00
5 POWERSPOT II
I .000 REFLECTOR 23274B-07
>-
t- REFRACTOR CLR DOOR GLASS
(/) 3200 SOCKET FIXED
z /1 1\'
w
r I ~ LAMP
z
- 2400
V) I 1\ 1000/1500 WATT METAL HALIOf
:::> V,'r \ \
0 I \ MVR1000/U OR MVR1500/HBU/E
z 1800 l \ \
:a
"'" I~ ,
:i "
BOO lP ''':.
/. t'-o. I
k 1--/ I , '.... ~
-,,~ -40 -3~ -30 -:il0 -cO -1~ -10 -:5 D j .0 .:i /0 :1) JO ;~ III' 5
DEGREES
VERTICAL - MARKED LINE HORIZONTAL. -- SOLID LINE I
LUMEN DISTRIBUTION - ISOCANDELA CURVES
)
AVG. LEFT AND. RIGHT SIDES
HOftllONTAl.ANGLES - OEGREES -
!S -0 ~~ :0 c~ 20 !!S 0 27
~5 4.2 0.3 0,3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 24 ~ GENERAL INFORMATION !
- ~o
1~ 5.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ~ 1.1 a: NEMA TYPE <41\ lC 3v I
- lA(.9 ~ ~1 ~ BEAM $l'READ 43.VERT.
1At . 8.2 0.3 O~ 0..4 0.4 0.6 1,4 2.1 SS !S
- ~B 49 . 50. HORIZ.
1~ 11.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.4 2.6 2.9 15 I
- ~B ...-!:"-1 BEAM EFFICIENCY 5-4%
Ie 14.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 O.~ 1.2 2.9 3.7 12. BEAM FLUX 538 LUMl:NS I
I-- ~ 0./3 ;3.5 ~
11 18.3 0.3 0.3 0.<\ 1.~ 2.1 5.2 MAX CANDELA 3244
I-- ~ oj.e 1/6 2.~ ~ 9
--!. III 24.6 0.3 0.3 0.4 6.7 L.e 6 ~ I
0 BA.SED ON IES 1971 STANDARD
~ iii 2/S la.s ~ cc OF '10% MAX CANDELA I
'J III 32.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.9 1.7 11.4 3 ~
w - ~
:: 3 34.i5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.9 .B ~.~ 6.3 ..4 12.1 o I PER 1000 LAMP LUMENS
. ::> I&.
-' !-- 0 70~ 2000 ~ !
Q, z 200 (00 00
:i ~ 0 ~. ~ p.5 o Cl MULTlPI.Y ALL LUMEN AND CANDELA
:s 3 ~ 34.9 0.3 0,3 0.4 1.0 1.9 6.5 12.1 ~ VALUES BY THE FOLLOWING RATIO
I-- ~ _~.e \.8 2\e l,.6 ..3 oJ
~ '} :I 33.6 0.3 0,3 0.4 1\5.5 12.2 r; RATIO.. ACTUAL LAMP LI.JMENS
~ -6 F=
- III 0~7 1\6 2.~ \.7 ~ 1000
10 , 26.7 0.3 0.3 0.4 7.3 II:
- ~ o,~ 1.5, ,3:'9 -9 !:
12 III 21.8 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.3 5.9 6.9 TEST MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH I~S
2 -12
- 3 ~.o ~1 ~ APPROVED METHOD FOR PHOTO-
13 17.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 r\.1 . 1 6.7
- o~ 1~ b .-15 METRIC TESTING OF FLOODLIGHTS
15 13.6 0.3 0.3 . 0.3 0.4 .......2.4 'a...5 -18..~ ~TEsno . . &bll' . - ... DATE ;'II.~~9A .
.- . ._ .~c
16 8.9 0.3 0.3 0:3 0.4 0.5 ~9 '1~ ~2 2:7
- Io-:-a f,.....LJ -21 UJ ~~
16 5.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.-4 0.6 1.2 III APPROVE2/ ~ DATE JI.,.g.?D
r-- -24 ~ .
17 3.6 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 -27 g ~{'d""DATE //..:J4.1D
4.7 . !5 . 1 13.1 10.3 19.8 31.4 55.9 83.6 JIll IOf .
LUMeNS - SUMMATION OF VERTICAL ZONES OI\AWlHC HO.. SliUT AlYISIOH
31.8/31 4130.9130.3 29.2127.21211l.J118.5110.2 35-178389R ''* I 00
$ lAMP LUMENS
(If.1 0102.402.
I .
.... . - .-.
VOd '::>OSSV ~ NOSdWOH.L>l< li"ld 9 t : L. 0 t' 6"" '17' 6" .;-2T:....:...-~
,.
, PUHRSPOT"II
1500 WATT'MV
M48 -
FIXED. . - . ,
IES'TYPE .
eIE TYPE
. I
4
1
1
90100203
ENG
11-05-
1000
FIRST TEST OF A NEMA 3 .
SAME FIXTURE AS TEST 9010
NE:MA 3
CLR F'LT GLAS , .
800
TILT=NONE
1 1000 2.6386 37 19 2 1 1 1 1
1 1'1500
-85 -75 -63 -55 -45 -42.5 -37.5 -35 -32.5 -27.5 -25 -22.5 -17.3 -15 -12.3 -7.5
-5 -2.5 0 2.5 5 7.5 12.5 15 17.5 22.5 23 27.5 32.5 35 37.5 42.5 45 55 65 75 as
o 2.5 5 7.5 12.5 1~ 17.5 22,5 25 27.5 32.5 35 37.5 42.5 45 55 65 75 85
o 1 2 16 40 40 40 41 42 55 73 91 208 293 377 724 861 999 907 960 921 882 485
385 285 159 111 64 44 41 37 37 36 24 2 1 0
o 1 3 16 40 40 40 42 43 54 72 89 205 287 369 687 841 995 946 982 908 833 468
374 280 156 110 64 4340 37 37 36 24 2 1 0
o 1 3 15 40 40 40 41 42 5369 85 190' 266 342 598 740 883 ssa 902 809 717 423 ~
343 262, 142 103 62 42 40 38 36 36 24 2 1 0
o 1 3 15 40 40 4041 42 52 66 81 175 246 316 509 640 771 821 821 711 600379
312 245 129 95 61 42 40 38 ZG 36 22 :2 1 0
o 1 3 16 40 40 40 41 42 48 59 69 126 179 233 341 38S 429 451 455 410 366 275
230 186 92 74 55 41 39 38 36 3619 3 10
o 1 3 16 40 40 41 ~41 46 34 62 104 145,186 275 ;Q7~339 353 357 327 297 226
187 147 79 65 50 41 '39 38 36 36 18 3 1 0
o 1 2 15 39 40 41 .41 41 44 ~o 56 82 110 139 209 228 248 255 259 243 227 177 142
108 65 56 46 40 39 37 36 36 17 3 1 0
o 1" 1 13 36.39 40 40 40 41 43 45 ~5 63 72 98 109 120 126 129 120 110 82 72 61
48 44 41 38 38 37 36 35 1~ :2 1 0
o 1 1 12 35 S8 39 39 39 40 41 42 48 53 59 74 a1 87 90 9287 81 66 59 53 44 42
39 38 37 36 36 35 14 2 1 0
o 1 1 10 32 37 3939 39 39 39 39 41 44 45 51 53 55 35 55 54 52 49 47 44 40 39
.38 37 36 36 3632 12 2 1 0
0.1 2 7 27 31 36 36 37 37 37 37 36 36 37 38 38 39 39 39 39 39 38 38 37 36 36 36
36 35 35 32 27 8 2 1 0
o 1 2 6 24 29 34 35 36 36 36 36 35 35 36 36 36 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 36 36 36. 35
33 35 34 29 24 6 2 1 0 '
o 1 2 5 20 26 32 33 34 35 35 35 34 34 34 34 35 35 35 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 35 35
35 34 33 25 20 5 2 1 0 ,
1) 1 1 4 12 16 23 26 28 3132 33 34 34 34 ,34..S:;:L34.S5 36.36-36..36.36:36 3634- 33'
29 2624-.16 11"4 100 '.,.., -"'- . _
o 1 1 3 8 11 17 20 22 26 28 29 31 32 32 33 33 33 34 35 3S 35 34 34 33 31 30 28
24 22 18 11 7 :3 1 0 0
() 0 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 13 14 15 18 19 20 22 23 23 24 23 23 22 21 20 19 16 15 13 10 '3
7431100'
) 0 1 12:2 2 2 :2 2 :2 2 :2 :2 2 2 2 2 2 222 2 :2 2 :2 :2 :2 2 :2 2 221 110
) 0 001 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 111 1 :2 2 2 :2 2 1 1 111 1 1 100 0 0
) 0 0 0 001 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 000
gOd .OOS S~ "'i' NOSdWOH.L* Wd 9 1: : L. 0 1: 6 ''17 0 . 2: 1:
..
"
!'/i 1
CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION
TO: David Harden, City Manager
(J,J,&/
FROM: John Walker, Project coordinato~~
DATE: December 3, 1991
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF 1991 SEA TURTLE CONSERVATION PROGRAM
Meeting of December 10, 1991
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
No action is requested of the Commission. This is a short
overview of the results of the 1991 Sea Turtle Conservation
Program.
BACKGROUND:
Monitoring of marine turtle nesting and hatching activity took
place from April 20th through the end of September this year. A
record 253 turtles nested in Delray Beach with a high degree of
hatching success. No reports were received of hatchling
disorientations or loses. Such a publicly quiet season belies
the hard work going on, so a summary of activities is
appropriate. This presentation will address:
- Threats to marine turtles
- City response to these threats
- Project methodology
- Results of the season
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
No action is necessary by the Commission.
JW/lh
c: David Kovacs
WS/I
JW/#5/TURTLE1.TXT :1K
'.
.,
II
. :)/,
I.
.~
fij)[f (p) ri'Ilr~ fi' r lJ'i~'
CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION,I ~" ^ n.. ill
U I JH,J ,I, m92 'U.
! - ::J\5C:JO U~i
TO: David Harden, City Manager ----------........"!I' ~-'..~'~r.'
FROM: John Walker, project coordinator~
DATE: Meeting of January 7, 1992
SUBJECT: BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECT - STATUS REPORT
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
No action is requested of the Commission. This is an
overview of the current status of the project and of the
issues controlling the construction schedule.
BACKGROUND:
We are reaching a decision point on this project which may
affect timing of construction and cost. Draft permits have
been developed by both State and Federal agencies with
conditions that will prohibit dredging from May 15 to
October 15. This is the target period for offshore dredging
because of favorable sea conditions. Calm seas allow the
project to be completed in 4-6 weeks and to avoid weather
delays, the fear of which translate into higher bid costs.
The reason for the proposed restriction is to eliminate
dredging during the main portion of the marine turtle
nesting season. We have requested that restrictive
conditions be removed, based on our eight years of
documentation that marine turtle nests can be successfully
relocated to allow construction during the nesting season
without adverse impact on the turtle population. We are
continuing to press the issue through the federal
government, but the parameters of the project are beginning
to limit our "float time". The following items will define
the parameters and their status:
1- Florida Department of Natural Resources Permit.
a. Draft permit with "timing window" conditions ready
to go before Governor and Cabinet. On hold at
City request.
"
,
~ city Commission Documentation
Beach Nourishment Project - Status Report
Page 2
b. Interagency agreements prevent FDNR from issuing
permits in opposition to u. S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS) biological opinion.
2. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Permit.
a. Draft permit ready for issuance with "timing
window" conditions required by FWS biological
opinion.
b. Corps of Engineers (COE) and City objecting to the
imposition of conditions.
3. General Design Memorandum/Local Cooperation Agreement.
a. General Design Memorandum (GDM) in final review
stage at COE District level. Final approval at
Washington projected for May, 1992.
b. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) review at COE is
just beginning. Final execution of LCA projected
for June, 1992.
4. State funding agreement.
a. Covers work completed before September 1, 1993.
5. County funding agreement.
a. Expires September 30, 1992. This agreement will
reimburse funds for work completed prior to the
expiration date. The agreement may be extended
with the approval of both parties.
6. Erosion status/Storm Protection.
a. Existing beach is at approximately the design
template. This is a cross-section representing
the design level of storm protection and is the
optimum point to construct the nourishment project
to maintain a constant level of storm protection.
7. Construction Cost.
a. Funds have been appropriated by State and Federal
governments with a cap on the total amount and
cost sharing percentages for the various tasks
within the project.
'.
'.
.
. City Commission Documentation
Beach Nourishment Project - Status Report
Page 3
b. A total of $6,519,694. have been appropriated by
Federal State and County governments for this
project.
c. A close estimate of the total project cost,
constructed in summer, is $6,047,357. This leaves
$472,337. "cushion".
d. A rough estimate of the same project constructed
in winter (based on conversations with dredging
companies) is $7,555,457. The 30% increase in
construction cost covers expected "down time" due
to rough weather.
e. The above situation exceeds allocated funds by
$1,035,763. This excess would be paid by the City
unless additional funds can be appropriated from
other levels of government.
8. Next steps.
a. The decision date for proceeding with the bid
process for construction of the Beach Nourishment
Project is late February, 1992. At that time we will
come before you with recommendations for proceeding.
Meanwhile, we will continue efforts to have the permits
issued without restrictive conditions.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
No action is necessary by the City Commission.
c: David Kovacs
JW/#5/NOURISH1.DOC
'.
,.
CflflS&75US : LE./ 5771FF GEl US/ 1bGE11!se. it CG 17fiS 1if7'-( SpfLf!:Cj f ,J,
)
'Rtcom(('fd7(]!ff70f/S/ 9ilJE- 10 CiTlf fT)AIJH9Ec. 8L( &/0 OF W~f:,C..
.J f}1:5b) hOfE-i!uI I y A &rnm/.55ICm mfm8sc:... LU/I! UOlwl7C.E.e.
~
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
FROM: . jv~, \J~~OR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
.
SUBJECT: CITY COMMISSION WORKSESSION OF JANUARY 7, 1992
ALL AMERICAN CITY APPLICATION - BACKGROUND
ITEM BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION:
This item is brought before the City Commission for
informational purposes and for direction. While no
formal action is required. It is desired that a
consensus be reached regarding the direction which is
being pursued; thus, allowing the administration to
continue with the application process.
BACKGROUND:
As discussed previously by the City Manager, it seems very
appropriate that the City of Delray Beach pursue the
designation of "All American City". The full title of the
program is:
All-America City Award
for Community Progress and Improvement through
Citizen Action, Effective Organization, and
Inter-Sectorial Cooperation
This award program's focus is upon the concept of Civic
Infrastructure. It is a qualitative concept intended for
use in evaluating the social and political fabric of a
community: how decisions are made, how citizens interact
with one another and government, and how challenges to the
community are met. In other words, the program focuses not
upon the fact that we are spending more than $20,000,000 on
our physical infrastructure but upon the citizen efforts
which were successful in bringing the "Decade of
Excellence" to the community and the success of the
referendum.
The criteria by which entries will be evaluated include:
* collaborative approaches to problem solving
* successful community action (public, private,
non-profit)
* pro-active citizen involvement.
yv5 5
,.
,.
City Commission Documentation
" Meeting of January 7, 1992
~
All American City Application - Background
Page 2
THE APPLICATION
The application is only eleven pages long. Additional
submittal materials (photographs, reports, etc. ) are not
allowed.
The application allows for the selection of three main
projects which are addressed by responding to six questions.
The responses are limited to two pages for each project.
The final portion of the application addresses how De1ray
Beach measures up to the "Civic Index" which is defined by
ten components. A copy of the Civic Index is attached.
The application is to be received by the National Civic
League, in Denver, by April 9, 1992.
THE DELRAY BEACH APPLICATION:
Major projects which are appropriate for inclusion are those
which have been "undertaken and completed which relate to a
basic challenge within the community". Members of the City
Administration have reviewed the program requirements and
feel that the following main projects are appropriate for
our focus:
* The Decade of Excellence Bond Program, including
VISIONS 2000, the citizen committees of the
Comprehensive Plan program, the evolution of the
capital improvement list, the citizen effort in
promotion of the referendum, and the resulting voter
turn-out.
* The Neighborhood Stabilization Program including the
partnerships which led to Auburn Trace and Allamanda
Gardens, the on-going CBDG program, Code Enforcement, CRA
loan program, neighborhood plans, Banker's Row effort, the
Neighborhoods Task Team, and community policing efforts.
* Downtown Revitalization including Atlantic Avenue
Beautification from 1-95 to the Intracoastal, Old
School Square, OSSHAD, historic preservation efforts,
and the Peach Umbrella Block.
In addition to completing the application, it is suggested
that the City "choose community partners to sponsor the
entry" . In reviewing the major projects, we suggest that
the following "partners" be sought.
,. ""If
City Commission Documentation
.. Meeting of January 7, 1992
All American City Application - Background
Page 3
Group/Partner Individual
City Commission Member
Decade of Excellence Program:
Visions 2000
Citizens from Comp Plan and
referendum steering committees
Neighborhood Stabilization Program:
Auburn Trace
C.R.A. Member
Neighborhoods Task Team
Schools Issues
Community Policing
Downtown Revitalization:
OSSHAD/Bankers Row/Pineapple Grove
Peach Umbrella
Old School Square
Historic Preservation
The role of the "Partners" will be to review the staff work
and provide direction as to how best to prepare the
application in light of the focus the awards program. Also,
these individuals will likely be contacted during "field
verifications" and may be called upon to travel to
Charlotte, North Carolina when formal presentations are made
by the finalists. In order to proceed in an expeditious
manner, it is suggested that the City Manager select one
individual from the above projects as participator on the
panel.
CONSENSUS:
If the City Commission is comfortable with the direction in
which the application is going, only a consensus about
continuing is necessary. Under the leadership of the City
Manager, the PARTNERS will be solicited and the application
formalized.
If individual Commission members feel that there should be
some change in direction, those concerns should be aired at
this time.
Attachments:
* The Civic Index
* All-America City Award Overview
DJK/CCCITY.DOC
..
"
. I .
Delray Beach Police Department ., ~
300 West Atlantic Avenue · Delray Beach, Florida 33444-3666 - .
(407) 243-7888 Fax (407) 243-7816 U. (j/M/fflOu.5 Co/7S6/l5uS :
Jfl kOI2- 01 Yh S faS/77on)
MEMORANDUM Rsu/eu.J /;/16 Ii-EmS /17 8u.~G-E:T
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager ~
FROM: Richard G. Overman, Chief of Police
DATE: December 10, 1991
SUBJECT: POLICE LEGAL ADVISOR
I am requesting permission to go forward with the request for
Commission approval for the Police Legal Advisor position. Mr.
Kurtz and I have discussed this issue and are in agreement with
the details regarding salary and duties. Please see his letter
to me for details. Below are duties that the legal advisor would
attend to:
. Will be a member of the Chief's Staff and will be present at
all staff meetings, to give input as well as legal guidance
regarding any matter coming before Staff.
0 Forfeiture actions which should result in expanded revenues
for the Law Enforcement Trust Fund.
0 Conduct in-service training for police officers in areas of
high liability, i. e. , search and seizure, search warrant and
filing of prosecution summaries. None has been conducted in
several years from my information.
0 Provide legal updates to all personnel in the changes in
laws.
. Provide legal review of defensive tactics and other high
liability hands-on training.
. Review of Policy and Procedure development regarding
legality and EEO concerns.
. Coordinate with the State Attorney's Office on matters
regarding improvement of writing skills of officers in order
to improve the quality of cases filed for prosecution.
. Consult with police officers on aspects of police work that
result in technical defenses to the successful prosecution
of a case.
~
, -- -- ~~t";)
~;ali~jj
~i 1) I ,~~:
~L~
-'It\ ,,;'~'.'"
--.....,....-
. a.
AN INTERNATIONALLY ACCREDITED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
. , ,SUBJECT: POLICE LEGAL ADVISOR
December 10, 1991
Page 2
. Prosecution of City Ordinance violations.
- To provide the Police Chief legal assistance and opinion in
personnel matters reference discipline, labor, American
Disability Act, etc.
I feel that it is essential that this position be approved
immediately. There are too many issues of concern facing a
department of this size to believe that we can have anything less
than full and immediate attention to matters of high liability.
Currently, Attorney Susan Ruby attends my staff meetings as often
as possible, and there are no meetings thus far that did not
require legal input regarding actions taken by staff.
Again, I respectfully request your support and would appreciate
the opportunity to move forward as soon as possible.
RGO/ppt
Attachment
'.
'.
. , ~
.
DEe 3 1991
[ITY DF DElHAY BEA[H REef/VEll
~
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE zoo NW
1',\(SI~lll F ,1(l7Ing 47(;(; Writer's Direct Line
(407) 243-7092
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 2, 1991
To: Chief Richard Overman, Delray Beach Police Department
From: Jeffrey S. Kurtz, City Attorney
Subject: Police Leqal Advisor
Attached please find estimated start up costs related to the
Police Legal Advisor position. The initial salary I have set
out for the position is $45,000 as I believe this person should
be an experienced attorney, preferably with a background as a
prosecutor or public defender. I have also included a
secretarial position as I would be disappointed if the work
product out of the office did not warrant a full-time
secretary. In addition to the start up costs I have estimated
budget projections for the next five years. In calculating
those budgets I have projected 7% increases in personal costs
and 5% increases in other costs. As we have previously
discussed, these costs can be fully funded through law
enforcement trust fund monies, not only in the first year of
operation, and assuming no change in current law, in upcoming
years as well.
I would envision that the position would be under my direction
and supervision while being physically located in your
department and obviously working with you directly on a
day-to-day basis. As a member of my office, however, I would
retain the ability to give the individual other assignments
that did not detract from his/her principal duties as a police
legal advisor. Should the position be approved, I would
envision both of us doing a screening interview(s) to find a
mutually acceptable candidate.
I have also attached a portion of my budget statement to the
City Commission for fiscal year 90-91 wherein I have outlined
the duties and responsibilities I feel are appropriate for the
position.
Once you have received these materials, I suggest we get
together and fully discuss the proposal with the City Manager.
JSK: jw
Attachment
poladv2.txt
'.
. .
City of Delray Beach
Operating Appropriation Justification
Estimated Budget 1991-92
Year 1 - 1991-92 Department: City Attorney
Package Name: Police Leqal Advisor
Account No.: Page: , 1 of 1
Full From
Ele/Obj Explanation Year 2/1/92
11. 12 Salaries & Wages - Regular 65,420 43,615
11.13 Salaries & Wages - Part-time -0-
11. 14 Overtime - Regular Emp. 250 167
11.21 FICA 5,000 3,335
11.22 Retirement Contribution -0- -0-
11.23 Health, Life, Disability 5,000 3,335
11.24 Workers' Comp 350 235
11. 25 Unemployment Compensation 100 67
11.27 ICMA -0- -0-
33.14 Medical Services 200 200
33.19 Other Prof. Services 1,500 1,000
33.54 Postage - Various 600 400
33.56 Memberships & Publications 2,500 1,835
(Westlaw-$2,000; memberships-$500)
33.57 Travel & Training 3,000 2,000
33.58 Auto Allowance 2,400 1,600
(at $200.00 per month)
33.97 Insurance Expense 4,600 3,067
35.11 Office Supplies - various
office and operating
supplies 1,500 1,500
60.89 Equipment - other - 15,000 15,000
Attny desk, cradenza,
chairs 3,000
Sec. Desk, chair 1,200
Computers, modems,
printer, software 7,700
Shelving 500
File Cabinets 1,000
Dictation equip. 600
Library 500
Typewriter 500
TOTALS 107,420 77,156
'. ,,""
. .
City of Delray Beach
Operating Appropriation Justification
Estimated Budget 1992-93
Year 2 - 1992-93 Department: City Attorney
Package Name: Police Leqal Advisor
Account No.: Page: , 1 of 1
Full
Ele/Obj Explanation Year
11.12 Salaries & Wages - Regular 70,000
11. 13 Salaries & Wages - Part-time -0-
11.14 Overtime - Regular Emp. 250
11.21 FICA 5,355
11. 22 Retirement Contribution 1,600
11.23 Health, Life, Disability 5,250
11.24 Workers' Comp 375
11.25 Unemployment Compensation 125
11.27 ICMA 4,600
33.14 Medical Services -0-
33.19 Other Prof. Services 1,575
33.54 Postage - Various 625
33.56 Memberships & Publications 2,625
(West1aw-$2,100; memberships-$525)
33.57 Travel & Training 3,150
33.58 Auto Allowance 2,400
(at $200.00 per month)
33.97 Insurance Expense 4,825
35.11 Office Supplies - various
office and operating
supplies 1,575
60.89 Equipment - other 1,000
TOTAL 105,330
'. ,; ~ I f
.
City of Delray Beach
Operating Appropriation Justification
Estimated Budget 1993-94
Year 3 - 1993-94 Department: City Attorney
Package Name: Police Leqal Advisor
Account No.: Page: ' 1 of 1
Full
Ele/Obj Explanation Year
11. 12 Salaries & Wages - Regular 74,900
11. 13 Salaries & Wages - Part-time -0-
11.14 Overtime - Regular Emp. 250
11.21 FICA 5,750
11.22 Retirement Contribution 1,725
11.23 Health, Life, Disability 5,525
11.24 Workers' Comp 400
11.25 Unemployment Compensation 125
11.27 ICMA 4,925
33.14 Medical Services -0-
33.19 Other Prof. Services 1,650
33.54 Postage - Various 650
33.56 Memberships & Publications 2,750
(Westlaw-$2,200; memberships-$550)
33.57 Travel & Training 3,300
33.58 Auto Allowance 2,400
(at $200.00 per month)
33.97 Insurance Expense 5,075
35.11 Office Supplies - various
office and operating
supplies 1,650
60.89 Equipment - other 1,050
TOTAL 109,725
,. ;WI'
"
.
.
City of Delray Beach
Operating Appropriation Justification
Estimated Budget 1994-95
Year 4 - 1994-95 Department: City Attorney
Package Name: Police Leqal Advisor
Account No.: Pa'ge : ' 1 of 1
Full
E1e/Obj Explanation Year
11. 12 Salaries & Wages - Regular 80,150
11.13 Salaries & Wages - Part-time -0-
11.14 Overtime - Regular Emp. 250
11.21 FICA 5,950
11.22 Retirement Contribution 1,850
11.23 Health, Life, Disability 5,800
11. 24 Workers' Comp 425
11.25 Unemployment Compensation 150
11.27 ICMA 5,150
33.14 Medical Services -0-
33.19 Other Prof. Services 1,750
33.54 Postage - Various 700
33.56 Memberships & Publications 2,900
(Westlaw-$2,325i memberships-$575)
33.57 Travel & Training 3,475
33.58 Auto Allowance 2,400
(at $200.00 per month)
33.97 Insurance Expense 5,325
35.11 Office Supplies - various
office and operating
supplies 1,750
60.89 Equipment - other 1,100
TOTAL 118,125
'.
'.
.
. .
City of Delray Beach
operating Appropriation Justification
Estimated Budget 1995-96
Year 5 - 1995-96 Department: City Attorney
Package Name: Police Leqal Advisor
Account No.: Page: . 1 of 1
Full
Ele/Obj Explanation Year
11. 12 Salaries & Wages - Regular 85,800
11.13 Salaries & Wages - Part-time -0-
11.14 Overtime - Regular Emp. 250
11.21 FICA 6,050
11.22 Retirement Contribution 1,975
11.23 Health, Life, Disability 6,075
11.24 Workers' Comp 450
11. 25 Unemployment Compensation 150
11.27 lCMA 5,175
33.14 Medical Services -0-
33.19 Other Prof. Services 1,825
33.54 Postage - Various 725
33.56 Memberships & Publications 3,050
(Westlaw-$2,450; memberships-$600)
33.57 Travel & Training 3,650
33.58 Auto Allowance 2,400
(at $200.00 per month)
33.97 Insurance Expense 5,600
35.11 Office Supplies - various
office and operating
supplies 1,825
60.89 Equipment - other 1,150
TOTAL 126,150
'.
.
. (' .. '" ....
.
Ci ty corrunission
August 3, 1990
Page 2
entry level position and anticipate a salary of $35,000
for that person. It would be my intention to have that
position filled as soon as possible in the next budget
year, and if authorized by the Commission, we will
immediately begin advertising for that position.
The second attorney position is that of the police legal
advisor, and I would anticipate that this person would
need a little more prosecutorial experience and would
therefore I would anticipate the initial starting salary
to be in the $45,000.per year range. The addition or-this
position is obviously a policy question for the City
Commission and would enable our office to enhance the
service that is being provided to the Police Department.
The addition of the position would allow the department to
more efficiently forfeiture actions resulting in expanded
revenues for the Law Enforcement Trust Fund.
In addition to enhancement of the forfeiture program,
in-house training and legal updates could be provided.on a
regular basis. This is a concept that has been acknow-
ledge by our office and the Police Department as an
important and beneficial goal to implement, however,
be~t1-Se of timing and manpower, limitations within our
off~ not-a- ,:single training session or seminar has been
conducted by our office for police officers in the 4 1/2
years I have been employed by the City. The police legal
advisor would also be in a position to more fully keep
abreast of the changes in criminal law, especially those
aspects of arrest and search and seizure law that are
under constant challenge and change. The position would
be one of a service position to the officers aiding them
and coordinating with the State Attorney's Office, improve
their report writing skills and being available to consult
with on the subtle aspects of police work that often
result in technical defenses to the successful prosecution
of a case. It is important to understand this position
would not be a replacement of the work done by our office
for the Police Department, but an increase in the services
to the department. The police legal advisor would be an
assistant city attorney working under my direction and not
a member of the Police Department. He/she would, in
addition to the above cited duties, take over prosecution
of forfeiture actions and city ordinance violations,
however, it would be my intent that they would not be
directly involved in personnel and labor matters to the
extent that those matters arose. Such matters would
continue to be handled by other attorneys within the
office. This would be done because obviously a close
... .' .... ....... .... ..... ..".... ... ... ... .~ ... ..... ,-. .~~ ....~ ... ". .',......
..
.
. '. . ( --.
.
City commission
August 3, 1990
Page 3
relationship would develop between the officers and
attorney. Another benefit to having such a position ,is
that it would enable the remainder of our office staff
have a lessened load and would be able to better serve the
rest of the City. Depending on the availability of Law
Enforcement Trust Funds, this position could be funded;'
along with the attendant secretarial position, out of Law
Enforcement Trust Fund monies. The addition of the police
legal advisor would necessitate the addition of a
secretarial position to maintain the one-to-one ratio of
secretaries- to ._attorneys which is an absolute minimum
figure.
2. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - When Mr. Thiele left the City, he
not only took himself and his vast knowledge and ability,
he also took books, a desk , bookshelves and chairs that
were owned by him, but were being used to benefit the
City. As I suspect it will be unlikely to find a new
attorney similarly equipped, it will be necessary for us
to replace the_ desk, bookshelves, and Florida
Jurisprude'nce-Volumes that Herb took with him. Of such
replacement items, the most expensive is the Florida Juris
Prudence set of research books which are very important as
a p~ary research tool. It would be my intention that if
thiS---;:i tern of the budget is. approved by the Ci ty __u' .-'#C.-"
Commission, we ,would immediately order a replacement
Florida Jurisprudence set of volumes so that they would be
on hand prior to the next budgetary year, but would be
paid out of next year's funds. The remaining books and
chairs are necessary to provide the two new attorneys and
secretary place to work likewise we will need to acquire
new computer equipment for them.
In addition to new equipment for the police legal advisor
and secretarial position, the budget, as proposed, contem-
plates purchase of three replacement computers for our
current secretaries. The City Attorney's Office network
computer ~system was, originally purchased in 1984 and
although it may have been adequate for that tim~ period
despite some updates, it has proved inadequate for our
current needs. There is a lack of memory availability and
with that a result.J..ng lack in the speed of the machines
and the ability of the machines to handle new processes.
Therefore, I propose upgrading the hardware by replacing
the three computers that are currently allocated to the
secretaries with new computers having a much greater
memory capacity. Furthermore, as part of the transition,
the computers the secretaries are using will be passed on
.r ..... r.... ... .
... . _.......~ _ .,." r
.. h ,,_.'" ........T,~ .-.........,._.. ... \* .;",.
"
~'-'f /v:-~ tJ{
. . t'IVj...
- ~ ~~.-<
7:"00 ,
DEL RAY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT ~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chief Richard G. Overman ~}
FROM: Maria C. Altieri, Police Planne....A
Support Bureau
DATE: January 3, 1992
SUBJECT: POLICE LEGAL ADVISOR - FURTHER JUSTIFICATION
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have further information regarding the Police Department's request for
a Police legal Advisor; these justifications are in compliance with your
and City Manager David T. Harden's requests.
Mr. Harden's memorandum of December 17, 1991, addressed severa 1 issues
concerning what would be a new position to our department:
1. What is our backlog of forfeitures?
2. What ordinance violations are not being prosecuted which might
be?
3. What kinds of problems have we had due to the lack of the
types of training outlined in your December 10, 1991, memo?
4. How frequently have these problems occurred?
5. Overall, how is the department being hampered by the lack of
this position?
Before addressing the above, I understand the l ega 1 Advisor ~s to be a
member of the Chief's staff whose basic function is to provide legal
guidance regarding any matter concerning the Police Department. The key
is "accessibility" when addressing matters of immediacy; the L e ga 1
Advisor will be present at all staff meetings to expound upon ambiguous
areas concerning legalities as well as interpretation of policy issues
which arise on a continual basis. The legal Advisor would also provide
the Police Chief assistance and opinion in personnel matters reference
hiring, firing, discipline, labor, American Disability Act, and EEO
concerns.
One of the main needs for a Police l ega 1 Advisor is the processing of
confiscated vehicles and the expeditious disposi ti on of money and
property through the court system. This department has experienced a
tremendous increase in the number of vehicles, monies, property, etc.
that is confiscated for illegal acts; on an average, our officers are
confiscating 3.5 vehicles per week. Al-t:hough the turnaround time for
~C' C;I J! ("j l ,:1 \~ 1.1 '.'. , \, \ I :. I
J I J , i
11 .;,}) I' \ \
,_.) I ", t \ \ r
..
"
. .
.
,.
POLICE lEGAL ADVISOR
January 3, 1992
Page two
processing these vehicles should only be a week to ten days, Administra-
tive lieutenant James J. Twitty advised that there are vehicles current-
ly in our custody that were seized in 1989. This backlog can be
attributed to the lack of timely advisement in legally complex matters;
although the City Attorney's office is of considerable assistance when
we can be accommodated, our issues are not necessa ri 1 y high priorities
when weighed against the City Attorney's current caseload.
The length of time a vehicle is held can mean loss of revenue to the
department either in administrative fees or asset depreciation; for
every vehicle returned to its owner, the department collects $250.00 in
administrative fees, and for every vehicle awarded to the depa rtment
through the court system, the department either keeps the vehicle to add
to its fleet or auctions it for revenue towards the law Enforcement
Trust Fund (per It. Twitty, we collected approximately $28,000 in 1990).
We have a situation in which a vehicle is being housed at the city's
compound that is in such a state of dilapidation (it was seized in 1989)
that it won't have significant monetary value once it becomes ours to be
auctioned. lt. Twitty indicated that there are as many as 17 seized
vehicles taking up space in our back lot; the affidavits are signed and
ready to be processed, but as to when (given the City Attorney's sched-
ule) is not a question that can be readily answered.
When the vehicles are not expeditiously removed from our custody, they
are subject to vandalism; and as we are, by law, responsible for return-
ing the vehicles to the owners in their original state, liability
expenses are incurred. In the meantime, we have vehicles maintained in
our lot that have been subject to anything from stereo to wheel thefts
which creates a monetary as well as a claims experience loss to the
department.
There is another factor to consider, and that is the time it takes to
process and monitor seizures. Lt. Twitty advised that he spends as much
as an hour and a half per day (which translates into 7.5 hours per week)
processing vehicles, negotiating wi th owners, and meeting with the City
Attorney's office to assure compliance with State Statute simply on this
aspect of his job. A Police legal Advisor could more adequately negoti-
ate and assure the expeditious processing of seized property, given
his/her knowledge and experience in such matters, as the position would
solely service the needs of our department. It would also be the legal
Advisor's responsibility to notify lien holders/owners of property
seizures as well as monitor a case's outcome.
The second need for a Police legal Advisor 1S illustrative in my find-
ings through the City Attorney's office that they are not prosecuting
ordinance violations, nor have they been for quite some time. I under-
stand that violations such as "open container/consuming in public" or
"illegal burning" constitutes arrests for the department, but not
necessarily successful prosecution. The State Attorney's office handles
..
..
.
.
.
.
POLICE LEGAL ADVISOR
January 3, 1992
Page three
the prosecution of city ordinances and City Attorney Jeff Kurtz
indicated that we have lost whatever controls or monitoring system to
assure prosecution in the best interests of the city. Should we have a
L ega 1 Advisor on staff, we can reserve the right to prosecute our own
ordinance violations.
Relative to training issues, Major Cochrane advised that currently the
department has had no training in legalities other than what is provided
through the State Attorney's office. Theirs is a legislative review
training course which is given once a year for a half-day session. Any
other 1 ega 1 training is through the academy or career development
classes at Palm Beach or Broward Community Colleges. Other off-site
classes touch on legal issues, but not as astutely as an on-staff l ega 1
Advisor could. The person J.n this position would provide training to
and consult with police officers 011 aspects of police work that result
in technical defenses to the successful prosecution of a case;
specifically, areas of high liability: 1) search and seizures, 2) Fourth
Amendment rights, 3) speedy trial issues, 4) laws of evidence, 5)
wri ting search warrants, 6) filing of prosecution summaries, and n
other issues relating to staff training on EEO, Affirmative Action, and
interviewing strategies.
Another area that requires the attention and expertise of a legal
Advisor is instruction in quality writing ski lIs for affidavits.
Lieutenants throughout the department can attest to an ongoing problem
in which case outcomes were not to our advantage because of unclear or
poorly written reports and warrants that could not be expeditiously
processed or successfully prosecuted. If a report, warrant, or
prosecution summary does not stand alone on its legal merits because it
is not written properly, then the possibility exists that there wi 11 be
no chance of the decision being held in the city's favor. The l ega 1
Advisor could review filing packets to assure that all information is
appropria tel y documented for the State Attorney's office, thereby
minimizing any administrative delays.
Overall, an in-house Advisor would be accessible for consultation on the
merits of a case, on whether or not a police officer made a good arrest
based upon 1 ega 1 statutes, and would provide legal updates to all
personnel in the changes in the law. As you expressed in your December
lOth memorandum, this posi ti on is essential to the department as we are
constantly addressing issues of high liabi Ii ty and immediacy; this
position would assure proper coordination with the administrative needs
of the State Attorney's office thereby achieving a cooperative effort in
the due process of the law.
MCA/
CCI Major William H. Cochrane, Support Bureau
.
-. .'11"
P, I. ?~0e6 (
, ~. I
. . PEe lie (?lll ~
I ) ~T,1!
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS, INC. I
December 19, 1991 P-1199
City of Delray Beach Environmental Services
434 South Swinton A venue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
ATIN: Mr. William H. Greenwood, P.E.
Asst. Director of Environmental Services/City Engineer
RE: In-Line Booster Master Pump Station Design and Construction Phase
Services
Gentlemen:
We are pleased to present the attached proposal for Engineering Services related to the
above referenced assignment. The objective of this assignment is to provide construction
plans, specifications, and related bidding documents for the construction of a new In-Line
Booster Master Pump Station for the City of Delray Beach as discussed in our meeting
December 6, 1991, with Hazen and Sawyer P.C. Engineers; Mr. David Harden, City
Manager; yourself and staff. During this meeting, it was agreed that PEe would stop
design work on the conventional submersible pump station and prepare this proposal for
an off-site (Veteran's Park) 11.2 MGD in-line booster pump station and, an on-site 724
gpm duplex submersible pump station and various force main improvements necessary
for the in-line booster manifold conversion. The development of this new assignment
consists of three (3) primary activities:
1. Preliminary Design
2. Final Design
3. Construction Administration
a. Bidding Phase Assistance
b. Construction Phase Assistance
Enclosed for your review are man-hour estimates included in Attachment A,' cost
estimates shown in Attachment B, and an implementation schedule shown in Attachment
C. Proposals from the subconsultants for electrical, structural and instrumentation
services are provided in Attachment D. We propose to perform the engineering services
described herein, utilizing the lump sum fee compensation method, for a total fee '.it
$258,074. Of this total fee, $168,955 represents fees for the preparation of constm-.:tion
plans, specifications and related bidding documents, and coordination and prepnation of
'II:)I(],;"I:> permit applications; (please note that no allowances for surveying, ~ Engineeri'Wsf"
.Ii.;II~t',(,;
~ Ii l.H~'lll~ 200 East Robtrlson Street -Suite 1 ~hU . (lila! it". Fiumll ]:~:!'i 1 . ,1Ci/';~<) (j(Jt1~ . FA;" .-107/8499401 1\
'.
,
..,
. .
City of Delray Beach Environmental Services P-1199
December 19, 1991
Page 2
services or geotechnical services are included as these services will be provided by the
City of De1ray Beach through other continuing consultants). The remaining fee of
$89,119 represents fees for construction administration services, including bidding phase
assistance, review of shop drawings, and review of periodic pay estimates and project
close-out. We are prepared to complete this assignment in conformance with the
implementation schedule contained in Attachment C. The anticipated completion schedule
for final design is 140 calendar days. from the receipt of an executed service
authorization.
We appreciate this opportunity to provide our engineering services for this assignment
and trust that the information provided herein is sufficient for your needs. If you have
any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the
undersigned.
Sincerely,
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
{)J;iIwe au~
Arthur R. Austin, P.E.
Manager, Environmental Department
ARA/ak
Attachments
cc: Mr. George Abou Jaoude, City of Delray Beach
. .
.
PROJECT BACKGROUND AND PREMISE
On December 6, 1991, a meeting was held at the City of Delray Beach to discuss
recommendations by Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. Engineers; (consultant to the City now
developing a wastewater collection master plan) regarding the Master Pump Station.
Based upon Hazen and Sawyer's hydraulic analysis of the wastewater collection system
served by the Master Pump Station, it was recommended to construct an in-line booster
pump station located north of the present master pump station. Although the capital cost
of an in-line booster station is greater than the conventional submersible pump station
which was under design, other non-monetary considerations give precedence to the in-line
booster. These non-monetary considerations are; 1) relocation of the master pump station
out of the downtown business area (Veteran's Park); 2) elimination of odor caused by an
open wetwell and the corresponding odor control equipment, and; 3) improved hydraulic
and operating efficiency in the wastewater collection system.
The project assignment now involves three components as follows: 1) An 11.2 MGD In-
Line Booster Master Pump Station (ILBMPS) possibly located near 3rd Street and the
railroad tracks; 2) Various force main improvements necessary for the in-line booster
manifold conversion and; 3) A small duplex submersible pump station located at or near
Veteran's Park for local gravity flows. A description of each project component is
presented as follows:
1. In-Line Booster Master Pump Station (L.S. l(Xl).
. At grade structure; "slab on grade".
. Multiple horizontal end suction centrifugal sewage pumps (3@ :t
150 hp or 4 @ +100 hp)
. Multiple speed drives (VFD QI two or three speed pumps).
. Overhead bridge crane for pump/motor removal.
. Roll-up garage door at rear of building.
. Motor Control Center to be separate room environmentally
controlled (air conditioned).
. Suction and discharge piping to be concrete encased under floor
slab (no pipe trenches).
. Pump separation of 5 feet 0 inches minimum.
. No bathroom facilities.
. Transformer mounted outside of building.
. Pump room finish to be sound block or double CMU wall at
contractors option.
. Motor drives, instrumentation equipment and electrical
subcontractor(s) to be pre-qualified.
. Emergency generator room to be finished with hospital grade
acoustical panels. Muffler to be critical hospital grade. Exterior
acoustical wall baffle to be provided at radiator exhaust louver.
..
- .
.
. All piping shall be contained within building.
. By-pass with check valve accessible within building.
. Booster Pump operator controlled by DFS SCADA system and
back-up Pump Controller.
2. Force Main Improvements (see attached exhibits)
. New force main from L.S. #1 to existing 24-inch influent force
main (suction header); 2400 L.F. 20-inch DIP.
. Manifold 12" force main from L.S. #8 and lO-inch force main
from L.S. #100A into existing 24-inch influent force main (suction
header); 100 L.p. 10-inch, 80 L.F. 12-inch PVC and 100 L.F. 16-
inch DIP.
. Extension of existing 16" force main (intercoastal waterway
crossing) into existing 24-inch influent force main (suction header);
400 L.F. 16-inch DIP.
. Extension of existing 6-inch force main from L.S. #5 into existing
24-inch influent force main; 550 L.F. 6-inch PVC.
. Extension of existing lO-inch force main from L.S. #4 into existing
F.M. #11 (to be reversed); 1200 L.F. lO-inch PVC.
. Repipe F.M. #11 into L.S. #11 (for repumping) and connect L.S.
#11 discharge into 30-inch influent force main (discharge header).
3. L.S. 100A -724 &pm (peak flow) duplex submersible pump station located
at or near V eteran' sPark
. Provide emergency receptacle only for portable generator set.
. Provide misting system in wetwell for odor control.
. Upon deactivation of existing Master Pump Station relocate
recently City purchased GAC odor control equipment to L.S. 100A
housed in a small single building.
.
" 111 1<......
. N ~ N ~ >
- - - - ~ ~ M ~ ~ .......
I
I I I N I !:! M I I ~
> .......
...... ......... ..
> . 0 n0,
\~ < I I I . I i ~ I I :
... ..>
0~ 00 0 .
i...
:>:<.:-:."
....a.
Ii Ii I I I N I ;'I 2 I I :II.
..
..... ....
.... .... 0 ~ ~ . . 0 0 0 . ~
:::: - ~ - - ~
....... ......
/ ". .....
...., .....
..: .....>
>i~ ......... N I I I N ~ M I I ~
.... J5.>>> .
...... ......>
....... I)) >/
') ,i N ~ - I N ~ N 2 ~, .J.
...... ::l e I
g .. ~ ... 'i ,s 8 .
] ~ ~ ~ 'a i le- 8 ..8 .~
...., 'a::E ... .;; .<l .... I
c 'oe e .. 8"
>.. .9 &l ~\ 8. i '0 :- ! 1 ~ .; ~
<< ~ :; ~ 2 ~ i< ....... = ~ .~ -5 ~ 1:: ~ l! 8 '~'i "8 . .
E: - ~ Q, - tlO '-... co.. .~ - u u .. .
o 'D ~ .. ~ .......- . ....! Q, ... >" U
f.W c::: "t) 4) .! :>>>:-:.. c:: 0.. _. C)
.5 ;:I : .2 .~ .. ......... ~.g.~ ~ ~ il Cl e ] -5 1 8' I
....... 8 .5 'u ~ .. ~ s.... 0 0 ] c.... Q, " ~ c ~ ~.
e :' g I .. ...... fIl.5...." .g 0 11 .<l ~,~ _
~ ..0 '" ~ ..... S ao t) .::.~; u ~: ~
o g~~:1 ~~ -5 1 ~ ilu ari~ H ~ ~
c ~ Q, Q., Q ~... c .- ~ 8 u 0" c S Q, ~
.8 :; ~ ~ .:< 'S -s:,s 'f :g il ~ ;. .~ j' ri ::.g ] n. i
giie"e u... 8 .., :f :,s.o ldC!>." tlO &. =
11 g.~:;g 8 ~ ~';;J g'il a .- .... e a.~ 2" ~ tI
g 'H = .5 ~ o:i ~ ~ 'x i .g ) i 0 is .~ 8 Q, .,3 ;!
i! 'C .~ 11 !i u....! j ~ g .:! e II .~.... f:'- ~ u .
....... Q, 0 -5 .., ... -5 ~ ;;. e 0 8 i!! Q, .- U 0 0 :f ._ ~ .s
... .. -5 -5 .. S >. ~ .<l -- c';;J ~ a '5 u >. .. u > C _
.- ;1'- ] " .,; I ~ .. ~ ~.g .0 0 -5 .':l u ~ e.9...
...... ....... .<l :t .-'" e u....:! ld .. goD . >. U ... l! g.. '3
> * ~ 11 ~ ~ a i!! ~ 1Zl'3 ] 'il H.i ;'.0 ~ ;'s ..,g S
IZl u c ~ .. -=.- 0 >. Ii' .. C ii .!:i :t "8'- ,!l Q, .0
< ~.g [.~ ~ ~ 'e ~ :~ -Clf! 8 C'~ ;.r ~. ~ .~ ~ .. 1 ~ f' Jl
-= c '" ..c ;:I .;; 0 E !j .., .- "'.. .. tlO ..
.1' ;:I g - c Q, ...... ~ ~ tr .=.. ;:I ;:I - C > ]:t .. "-
Q i:! ".- e :ill ...... .t;>.oI" Q, U ~ 0 ~ 2 0" _ =
< .... 0 Cl ] e tlO ..; 0 .. 0 'C 'IIi ~ .. .S 'a 'D ~ Q, Q, ':; :! >.
11< ~ ~ l.il .; .ll &. ....... .8 e- ~.~ : ~ g g .~ 11 . ~ ;:I i' i! e .g ;
.I<~ .':l ,as l] g Q, 9 U g;:l ~ .= ::l ~ g l! l:! ~ . g ,2 :-::
1111iill.l....i......I~<' ~ ] ~ u ;] ...... ~ ~ :a ~ .i ~'S .;:i 9. e g ~ ~ j '3 ] ~ ....
1< -5 ;:I l.il ~ >. ~ 'D '0 ~ C iI ~ u il ~ ~,s;c e .. c ....
........../....... ~ l ~ ~] .:! :!! g ~ g .g; g .9 =a .~ g .l!; i 0 r~ .~ ~ ~
.., u !j ld i'!l E!'D "'D !I/'" _ ill a!!ll:::l u...,.... ._
o .0 .!! ..c.- " 0 l! -=.. 'IIi ~?;o ~ - 8.!:l .5; ?;o -5'" 0;:1
~ ::.: a :2 3 j :s.. Cl'; 90 813 'a l! ; s 1!'il 1 .- .- i "8 l
IF .......... e :t u :t i' !i :t 8' .... g' ;.0 ;:I. ] ~ ~.~ Q, u ~ U ~ lQ .. l?/l . ..
1>< Q, S ::.: s :: ... '~"8 0 ~ Q, II g.8 '! tlO"8 g '0 11 II! 1 g -5 Cl ',3 ......
I. ....... .8 ~ :t ~ -a ~ e ~ .~ c ] 9 ~: r.].. t ~ g ~ . e.~ c'a .
1< 0 .~ ..c :t ~ :! ] 0 U.g ~ .S :5 ,0 8" c ~ '" g:f II! ] tlO II< c
..... ..,..................... -;;; -5:2 g ~ IZl ..'g ~ s ] g. jj l! a.g ~ M'g'C > ".S ~ 8. . .....
.. 0 .... ~ . >.; _ '" .. fIl C iI ._.o....c .. ~ ~ ...., ~.. . ......
.- 0 .. .... - e 3.... Q, 0'- .., D ... tlO .. a .. .. U .. lQ>
.. ceO :I - = ~ .~ ~.':l ] ~ ...- a. a.'60'~ a. u _._
lei " ~ .g .g g g. Cl r~ 0 =;3 '>~ ~ .." r~ 1 e j f! I c; Q f! ~ .! ~ ...
1< l.g .. :!! .= ~ .... I' ..., ,.. < ~ Q, fIl Q, ...,.. Q,.. 4;.. III ~ 4; Q, .0;"-
's .5 .g E: ~ Q, 0 1<;
f! - 'C 0 c '" ?;o I
.............. 4; < : :s r.:;g D/. < lXi U Q III ~ ci:li ....
.......
.... L
...... I 1...- . .
I .j;""
> -1<
"
.
.
0\ ... N - '" N I N
- - - -
I I I N - N I N
I I ... I I I I I
^ ^ ^ ^
C ~ C 5
.. ..
10 I N 10 N I I I g g g.
li >- >- >-
llQ llQ llQ
V V V V
I ... N ... N 0 I 0
- -
N I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
I II 1 " 2
.,; . ~ ~ "i ! .g ! ..
= I>Il ~ I>Il I 1>Il'
.!l .9 .~ 'C .~ g .~ .!ij .9 ~
'" '" .1 .~ g!lA
=' :9 "'- '" :;; ;1i :a
. ..., a ~
.::: ~ =- ~1~ iil.! ...
'S ~ ~ il I - 0
s ~ ~1~.g . ~ ..
1 8 .. .. ... =" Ii 1 .~ ~ 2
. 's e = ..., 0 e 'I.; j J "'ee 0
. . 0 g :J ';3
~ 0 '" :;; 8: a '" .
iu ~ .~ 1 . ..c: "8 ~ .;:,g ~
.. .. .f! =' "'1 >- 0 ~..!
.!l .. g 'Ii . ..... e 0 . .!:: - =' 8"" 8
"'-5 = i 8 .; 002 is ~ a';:J 0 ~ e
a 'i .. iil ~ g ... '8
g >- I>Il '8 'g ;gl 0
. '" - ..
";:: .D ~ ~ .~ ';3 ... . · -5 ,g
o .. .. "8 1 ~ ~ ~ :I e 0 '~ ~
5:0 e .9- . 0.. . ~... ~
~ ~ 02 . ..., .. e ~.~ 0 '! .~ II i .. 0
.....!l e ';3 '" .~ ~ .. :& -'2 u 0 a~
= .~ ... ~ "8 .. .. 8 - .. .. .i
o .. ~'3
o ~ 0 .~ e .. . >- >- .. ~ =- ~ "8 ..d o.
. =' 'C 'i .~ 1- ~:s8,o ~
.,; .. .9 ~ a 'C =' ~ ...,.0...11 oil!).8 . l:! s &.
il ~ .=. l 2!l g~~~ ..c: l"'c . .8 'a
a 'il .. .. I>Il ::~:a ~ 1
02 ~g S iil ! - '"
'" .. 'x .!!!I lil 'C l:! ci' i =..c: il '8 ~ go
...0 .. .. iil C =' ';3 ~ .g'~ 8 · .0
~ g e... o 0 ~ ~ !; .g g 'Q a';
02 0 1 8 ~i .. ..c: g :;; ~j .8 :;;
.. = .; .~ ~ . II I>Il "1';3 0 ~ =
.. 0 0 i .~ . J -,g"= - ';j
il ';3 t .. 0 . iil.~ ., .t' 3 t.g iil ..., 0
.~ - 1
i ~ .2g s 0 .~ .. >- 'C "'.~ ';j 0-
'" 'S s~ :i 1 !. .. e .. " > x
.. =' el ~ t..~.~ > . a "8 ~~ 2
.02 ~- 02 III .~ 1i is
.... .S ';3 S g g ~ '] e . 0
S 'C =' a . '" i' .! "'0 ""-iil ;:-~!) . ';3
.r . g t "'-.f@] ... iil iil .. ~
; 8 2.x ~ .r "8 ii 0 ....;3 8 'C ~ g ~
~ ~:O' .~
~'€ =-2 'i il · - ~'" O.='J :: =' i ~ .~ j! c: .;
il '" e e " .0 i 'C - 0 " u 8~
.~ .. ..., ; ..:.= := 11 >- x
u '" '0 ~ .; ..., ..., ; t 5 8: i ..
.. .. .; J ~ .. -5 . ;'1 .;: =' ~ - ..
:o~ .. '::3 .1...... .. >
.!l 11-5 1i Ii 1i g .. ... >- .s ~'Q ~ 8 ~ &. · x
.~ .~ .t' .. '" X .!:l ~ l.i .1>Il~. a . .0 ..c:il..~ - a · J]
~"8 'C .0 a . .! l ~ ~:O~~-;::- 11 - ..c: .13
.. .. 1 ~ .0 ..c: i :i e ~ ~ _ .. x e
j) .... t'.. t' "'.. ~.!ij ~ e ~ ! _ 'C . .5 l:!JJ
.~ ~ i'C >- e .. ..
.. '" ~~ ! .. .cS .~ · .. .~ i e1]j .8 .~ .0 .~
'> a ~ Ole"'=' 1i ..
's 's ~ 'C :=oolo '" ii i' .. ..
e >- "'; :.= 'C i ..0 i1>- u .. g~cSt' .. -5..s
e .. :.= ::: X .. .. .0 .0 :s1
"8 .. .; a ",. e ~I s s:s S :S 5 I>Il g "8 -5 I>Il .. JJ ~ ~a
.. ~ go.!! '" ! !~ ! :J 1 .~ ., o ~.!ii t s-
~~ ~ .~ .~ ~ ~ s ,~ ~ '2 .t'g,
-~ .~ . i i i l'i i. U 0 =' '" III &.
::! .. ~1 ..- ..
=- .~ .0 j) 8 8 ~ ~
o~ ~ . .0 = 8 is 0 0
~ =' 0 ='... =' :::- a € €
U 'C . 0 III ';3 III 0 U u,-, u 0 0 III '-'
.( = u ci III ~ ci == ....
. .
. .
~ ~ \0
^ ^ ^ ^
-II Z Z Z Z
000 0
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
I 1 I ~ ~ S ~
< < < <
UI UI UI UI
^ ^ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~
C C C 999 9
~ ~ ~ \Q I I ~ ~ ~ ~
;>., ;>., ;>., ~ ~ ~ ~
e e e 81 81 81 81
Q Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z
~ ~ ~ ~
M \Q \Q ffi ffi ffi ffi
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
000 0
u u u U
-II V V V V
- \Q I
~ 0: :;
o .g -5 .2 ..
~ ~ '>.!l .~ 1 "'8 ~ .i
C) 2.&> f. ....
"8 .. ~ ~.2 ~ . 8- So ~ !1
· .g S .J] 0:" t: = ~..
"'Q ...... " aD 0" a.. Q, w
~ ~ J 1~"'8 ~ ~ ~ ~ l~
.. ~ · II! lr" Q, .2.... ... a i
v Q ~~. 0 w
-5 >. ~ ~- Q. ~ Q, 0: 0 18
... · ~ e ~ ~ ~ 0 .. .._
o ~ = .c i! c C) x '= .. ..
C)... Q,O" .&> ~ I · :::I.:!
.S 0 t ;>.,,,...... ,; .! 51 l!
] ~ -50 .&>e 38 ~ ~ ~~
~ tlO ~ '-. Q, 0"
; 'C "8 .8.c..:. i . ~ " ~ II !5
" 0: · 'C 3 ;; e C) C) "8 0: 2 ~
~ iri C a~ e~ "8 1 . ~ ~~
.. ~~ 8 2~~.. · a ~ .~
.. .- ~ Q, C 0 C) . 3 _ " 3 .:!
llIl 3''= 0 ..a ",ll .. .. ::... C!
0: ,,=;>., .~;>.,'" ~ ":I ~ 0 .g~
'21. . ~.':: :I c '3 tlO'u 0: 3 g ';J
a w OJ C _ u . C C ._
'6'0 8 = =.= 2!l tII ~ ~ 'C C) ~ :w 0:
.8~ ;i: S~ ~~ R :J ] g ~~
;>., ".&> -c 2 a -= oS - ~r::
1.! g i :i . '5 a fS: ~ '~ ,Ie' ~ ,8 90 ,rr
~ 0 .. = .- ~ ..c:l .. " llIl 2 c I:: ~
..-:; C) > ~ 'I'l 'e ~ tII to.- !3 0.:: C = =
.- ~ . :0 2; /5 .c 8!:l ! 'i 'j3 's ~ ~ ~
'I'l.~ t!.: Q, ... '<j' Q, . !! El 's '; 'c i' ~ .. .l:
~;>., ~ II 8 ~ \Q i! ;>., r:: :t ~ ';:;' 5 3 8 ~
,.l. '3 :;" .=~ To "8 ~ '& a 'il . 2 C) Q, .g :: .= '=
C5!!1 ". .c...... ~ C)::l ~ Q, -!=l" · '2 :0 ~
Me -- -.....&>.. 'e.,::; ...
~.~ .~: ~ ~ i i I:; ~ .J.~ 1 '~ i' i ~'j.
2 2 ~ ~ .S 0: 0 "0 .c ii e :: ~ · i- .> 0 ~ :::I ~
.,g fS: ::l'" ~:s ~ 0: :- C) ~ tII" 8 .. 3 " .- 51 '2
~.. C) ~ ::l.- .!II 0 -'" ;a ~ 0 3.c .. ~ ~ ":l .g
OX" -!:l .,. ~ =.=... e. "c ~ .- '2 C ..
. -5 ~'. ::;>., S!!I "0.- 50 to '5 II. E: . '= .c .. ~
.. .- " C).c .l: - .... - .g 0: ::l i C C)
2 g ~.~ ~ ~ 0 'E 8.~ To .c UI llIli .g ,,g 3 ~ ~
"bO - C i .c .=" ,- ;>., l.1l .. c
.g ~ .; i ~ 1! .g ~ :! <.c ~ cJ . ~ 1! ; ci.~ llIl 1 ..
.~ ~ ~ ~ ] 2 .~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ :@.~ :@ i t '~'g. ~ g .g
~" ..J e II. llIl ~ ~ r:: Z e e ~.g ~ l! Q," ,S ._.= e
It .. - u! .':: E' "8 . 'E '8 It
...... ...... ~ ~ e J~ ~~ ~::l "J 802
~ e \,,;-......, 4; JIII:4..a ~. >c. CI). Uua..
~ ~ ~ < = U Q
lilt ..'
.
\I') ::: 0\ \D
.... ...-4.... .....
I I I I
I \0 I I
N ff"A" .....
I - I I
N .,. .,.
OJ).,......~.
1 .1 ...~...:.J
~ ~ ........1....
e ~ ................................. .......................................1.......
~ :" ..l
.&> c.
S ~v>!
.~ gJ}l~
. :l '2'<1 <~
.~ ~ .;- c. ..... J'
~ ~ ~ i.<.A... <\ ::
g .~ 8. ~ -:::::",::- :(i :
e .. l:: c:: ....JI......
... . "'. c. '.:l{19.
l; ~:! ~ II ......................2!.... ..............1............
~ .S ~ .~ 6;<'
.e !.~ i'~ ......~..
s >. R .. .2 ......;...11 ...... .
~ a'~ .~ 8:<t>!'
.. '::1 If .. 'l' . p. .....
<oS =" OJ) ....l:l.
.. >. .. e......... ..
<) e ... - .,e, .....~. ..............
s c. l! l! >. .... ...........
1 ] t ~ ~.h iI
-S!ll 'C ~. ........1. .'. ........
'i .5 ~ .:'''> .... .....
~ :: 0; ~ 6 "::> :~
.. _ e ~.!:l ........ .. ......
i 1 t ~ ~i;i;i:l..;
" e -';1 ~ .~............
i t ~~ 38./>/
.. e ~ l! ~ <> ......... .... ..........
"28 g, -;;..,: - ~ ...........................<
e .. -s II ~ ........... ... . ..
u g;; ~ 'i ~ i'/<
~ ~ ci =
.
V \0
..... -
_ \0
-
\0 ~
o
I M
.....
g g
o 0
..... ;
\0 V
- \0
)
M M
- .....
..
o
"= -;;-
.. =
..c bO
0.-
v ..
e d ..
]] ~
~a ~ i
.- U .- Q Cf)
.~ 2 v Ii' . ,_
~cii i ~ a ~
..s ] .- 11 .;:2 0
.!.. .;.!! ~ .:
"'= ..v Ii! .9
""0 olI~ ~1lO 0 e-=.!!
~ .= IlO .! ::l ~ < ~ tJ v ._ "_
.C S c: j} ~ .; ..... ..... 8 0 _ l! = S S
3= l~ ga~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~dd
.~ ! g ~ .. ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e Jl l! g ~ ~
! .$ ; :i i I ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. i olI oi ~ j j
~~ ~>e~==.!l~~~~~~~~~~ a~ ==~vaa
~fl z]&~~~~~"',.".. ~e ~~m~::s::s
o~ s ;; = _.Cl. ::s :::: , , ~ i i i i ~ i i ~ a c "".,
i~ ~~I ~:~~~~~~II~~I~~I~ ~8.!!~~~~~~
"".. ;S'c :0 ~ .!! " Ii; d d ~ ::s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1: ~ = 5 Os ::s ::s ::s ::s ::s ::s
00 0 = ... ....eeeeeeeee .."!;Iv............
>.... .... .i - ~' " ~ ~ 0 0 .!l .!l .!l .!l .!l ~
Ii ~di!II~;;;f~JJJJJJJJJ~~~~~~~~~~~
.a, .... ~ Cl -8 ~d5;g;g;g;g;g;g;g;g;gj}j}888d5d5d5d5d5d5
~~ ~ ...9~1-f'~!!..s..s..s..s..s..s..s..s..sQQ___:!8!8l!l!
i:j Cl.. ~ ~ "I &>. ui. .- oi :.J :.J .s .s .s .s 's oS .s .S 's ~ ~ ui ui ui :.J :.J :.:l :.J :.J :.J
a~ ~ 8]!~J ~~~~~~~~~::s~::s~i:ji:jJJJ~~~~~~
1 ~ .~
.. 0 ~
. .Cl,.g e -;;
.~ Jl ~ ~ - .la
vV 0= t'! .
- v ".- u - ..c
~ U) :1 - CI .... u
-;; '-' =.-.. o~ V
=M Oll! [~ tJ O-M....V~\O.....::s
~u U.- T -N ~~~_________~~~~~~~~",,= ,,0 -M...., ,....v~\O,"""'" .....................................
~ i~ i~ oootJuutJtJtJtJtJuuuutJutJtJu~~~~~~~~~
.w ell!" 0
d II:; ~ .:f: ~
O-N~.~~~~~o_~ ~~~~O
,5 -l . ~ - M .... v ~ \0 ..... 00 0. - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ M M M :::l ;:!i :q M M M M ....
lI. ~ 1Il
=
., ""
~.,. .... t-oo
N "lit ... M-
1Z'" .,. <"l <"l
I I ~ I I
I I \0 I I
S;:o t- "'00
_ ~ ..... N
t: I .... <"l I
~ ~ .... _ 00
>-.
~ ! >-.
'=.9 .0
~,~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ J: ~ ~
OJ it: ,~ ~ ~ >-. a
" !!ll! 1 lil e .-
-; ,!:l U Q "8 'i t=,
1 1 -;,.. ~ ...:
~ ~!!l e...........
.. ~ .!!a ' Q >'" 0 :!
] ": 's =0 Q Ii..g ~ OJ
.1l :; l! ~ a:.....~ 0.s0l U ,~
OJ .!!a ~ - 0 "'!I OJ .......... U
- '-. ~ '.::I OJ . 'i!" c - '" -.....w =
~ ~ .~ ] 8 E i ] ~ ~ ].!!a -5 ~ j j! ~.~ ~
OJ . ~ ~ a: iil ~ .1l ,.90 i' 's (J) -a :! .. (J) g.,::" ~ ~
2 :s 2 <i'i "" - - - ~ 'Q~.6o ll.1l i;l lS'a i ~ '.::I U -5 c.. .2
o S ,9 . c: e e e e J.II ~ ~ 8 OO;:J ~ o!! -5 '0 ~ > ,..:.
c .. '.::I = ... :; · a a a .. =.' ~ ::l ~ 00 '-..... e ~
~~]~~Jit:~JJJ~ ~~a:tJli""8t~ ! I~~ 1 1~
'C " C ~ c'" '.::I ~ ~ ~ :R . II ~ 3 Q -;. . I: 111 e ~ 3", g, . l:ii
~ ~ .~ ~ a: ! J ~ ~ ~ < .. ;g ] ! US ;j iil ~ ~ i If ~ ~.~ ~.s:€ a ~
~<<I>':lltl'tle~"II"11111 c..,. ..g!il il Q
1"*jl:;~~~~~~~5=ll~~~~~~;>o,~~ 0 tIt=."'" ... 3...
~ i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ a ~ I i ~ 1 i ~
,. .. ~ > ; ; ; ; ; ; ; .. ~ in ; ; i i ; ; .0 ; i 1 = ~ ~;>o, c..:s U
j ~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~!~~ i ~~~ ~ .s~.s
'0 e - - l! l! l! 8 8 8 g 11 .~ - 8 8 8 8 8 8 c 8 8 i::.... > ~ ~ ,~~ ~
':: 8"::l :.J :.J :.J ::l ::l ;:l III ,;I '::l::l:.J:.J::l::l 5 :.J :.J .s 01 g . C ~ , OJ ~;/
; ~~~AAAAAJA~~~AAAJAAJAA 6 ill j I ~i
\0 '::1 0.. 00 e """" ,-
.... = 00 c....c -. ..9"e
>C ,0 ,a .g e: e;." 3 o!! 8
. .::I ::I "'1::1 .!.. e~
d - - ~ l! ~.. flS c ,8 0"
e ::l " 0 .2;>0,;" Q.g c.. ~ ~
:0 I ~ 'S ~'i ~.,:: ~ u... .9 '0::
,S :E i:: 3 :::.g ... U ':; 3 ~ e OJ ~
~ .- OJ iil J 'Q 0 -5 e OJ g: ,6, c
e~_<"l"" ~ t-oo~~=-N"" ~ t-oo ":!l -. ~ o~
Q'Q-"'~ ,"i'.", ,,),,),..~'t.),~..~,~,-;,~,,;, i' ",,3 a'a u ~:s
ti tI) ~ CI) fI) en tI) CI) en con (/) cn ""' ~ ... ~ I0Il4 ..... I0.I.l ~ ..... ...... ~ _.. ...!!! .s C liS - a
~ ~ €J~ .ou 8 e8
C 'i! "eo!! i c.. - u_
o 0 ~8c -"" a e::l
U ~. ~ t.::I 0 l! e t.::I -5 'S
eZ e e~~ t.::I~ e ~~
· ' . . c c. u sr . ';::S 3
Co Co c..uE .we: c.. Co
e~_"''''''''~\Ot-oo~O-<''l'''''''~\Ot-OO~O_N e e~o ~= e ,?U
~Q~MM~MMMMM~...~.~.~.~~~ ~ ~Qu ~. ~ ~~
~ UQ L1i ~o
lilr: : :: : : :,1.. I .: : ::: ::: ::
........ ... ... ... .,..
';HI;III;T~lll 't" 0 IIII~.';
....>........:.....:.:...............:.....:.:..:: :.:......~:... ..... I I M I I ~ ::......c.. > I I I I I I I I I I
............ ..... ....}.
.... ...... ... ...
............8.
. .... ...
'.. ....
. ... ....
... './..' ,:,'<i..
Il;I,\ r ~ '::: :~;;r ~ ' : ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
... ...>H I>. ij. - In M - - _ t::: '" ~ '" '4) _ M '" ~ M '"
>/ r5.
:.)/.......::\..:::. 1../.:::...
. .. ... .. ....>.
/<><:~
il;;~l~;I'l~~ ' 12 1 ~ N;N ~ ~,- 22~ ~.
...................:......~=..I;II;IB i)~ I I '" 00 M -.~ I .....::: ~ ::: I '" ..,. I M I '"
:.: ...... I<.ffi--. ...
>>z;.. 1< ...:......
1/ 0 ,>.. -.:c~ II :.........C.....
I... ....... 1::. -a c ....: == . S
1:.....<.:. .... . -<.. :::.. 8" ::..... ~ .. ~
I.... = F-o.>._ -a . '-;. II ,,_
1>>>:'0' en. :! '0 >": l:l t' .:; Q,
<...:<....... ... ......j.... <>.o..c: - . :l " ... " S
...../:. ",.. . 3 0 -a c: f"o Ii 8.. ~ 0
.>.:.....:..i-<.. ~.:. :.. a .~ ~:a [)~ !I ~ ~ ~ .g ~
.>..'~ f"o~ f"o. .9 0 - 0. ,g ,c: U:l i:j .:l ..
/z ..~. ....~. ~ s .r:'=:" Jiill(/ e ~,.g ~ a.s
<..:...~f:.. .~:. S e- * 0 :i .......~:..... !' 0 Oii' ~ ~ :!
II.. ~. U " /Xi..... '.--~. .., U '-' -a ..
...~. . 8.... 8'..9< X.:; >-. 0. .g
l;,) r;o;l . .. -a >-. U :::...:.: F e.- _ :l 0 ..
.\......'<.=:... I. '8; ~ 8 € ::.:..1 8 ~ 8~ .~ e ,!!
Q./ .. .. ~ 0 ::.::.1: .. .. ~
';~o~E; 3 ~ .. ~ ~ ..... . a.. . ~ I
<OI:!i...........: ..././1...... 1:<< c, f!l ~ 8-... 1 .... "'8 ~ ~ "'8 ~...; "
</j '"" ..... I>>.. .-.. 0 . .... .. ~.. .. 0 0':;
<< : ~:./ ..... I:.> ~ ~ U >-. "" ..!! 20 e...
:'::>,.:'i:i:: ... ,.....:!: >..- :::.:: l!! 8.0 C:l l:::" ._
> l;,) :'..:.:: -.; 3 .o":a e - l.tl -g Q,':; 8
<.>:. < "0 U "O..c::! ...:: ,,"'8 .. Q..,..c: .. a '2
:..::......:...... Col. ~ IJ.l ~ ~ e- I ~.. ii >-. ~ _.! ,9 c
.:. :.::.....:..........:...::.:. j:Q:: - ~ e,:lj U 0 ~ ~ .0 c: Ii.;::;.. _.!!
. ..... "-.. .- Q, U U 0 ~ 0 .. c::" .:l"
>.... ./... !!l Ii Q, >-''' c: ... l::.,:2 C:.o'" a "0
.. .. .. .< i:j "0 ...." 0 .. .. U !!:l -a "0
I................................ :..:..:=. - .- ...!:j.:; :.:..,:2 - 8 Q, j t:.. c s-
.:. .,,:,0..:1 ::: :: .. 1/ u. . . U 0 ';; e 8 3" S c
. :....lol. .. 0 . ~ 3 :. .:. ~ 0. 0 0 ,9
......./.:......:). Q U "" i ~ : ~2 i :s ~ .8 8 ~]] R ~
>. r&. IJ.l 5 ">-'..c: 0> I u 0 g.. "0 U.;:l C i-
..................~.. ... l1:, s ~ 0 ~u .::: ........ ..~ i! ] ~ . .i ~ ~ e e ~ ,:
....... ....... >. ... ..c: a ...., 0 Q, ~ c: eO.!!l
::<<-:> ".": . :::::T/:::::::::: I:::::: (,) .- C I ... 0 .. c.. U. II I:: C
<5 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ .g< < 1 :.s ',:2 !I ~ e'~ c "8 ~
. . ..' . "0 C:".!:j:l = ... c" ~"":l
<..................(.....<..... I>.... e-" ~ .9 -< 1/ a<< ...a .. ooe's 2 :i.:; eo ~ ~ C!"8
..... . ,... . -".. ~ ... ~ l( ...... - >-. i ',:2 .. 0
........ .............. ...<\ 1/':; = U 0 ... " .......' " 0. U 0 00 3 ~ a c:" s U
..:: I...:.... ~" ..:: C 0 .9 ... .... >-. 32 "c U c" C .- 0 00 . c
........ <><... 3 S 'C' 0 >-. ",.<. I .. " 8 i:.! 00 ',:2".-"8 u; ~.. 0
...... I.> 0 "0 :l ~ ~.~ .-=: .S ...... I Q .0 1I..g .c . g :3 3 .. a ~ ~ ~'~
... L l.', I>.......,... .~ 5 ~ :: ~ '8 ~ '28 > ~ ~ -g ~ ~ i 6 e S e .g "0 .s ~ c's
I:'!l! U Q, !!l:l"" ........ C .. _....." u C C
...... ...... ....... 1<.1: "i!:!f c 8 S '> U ..... 11 e 3 0 ~ ... !' . i'! :0 ": 5 0 0
. ...... ... ... · 11 .:; :0 . -g "0 8 ] !i I .. .... .1 c.!! 5 i.,:2 l! .,:2 ~ 00 e i- _ ~ U ~
.....J~. >-. ~ ~ C ..:: 00 U -a c 1.< ... 5',:2 "" i -a :I e e 0. .s~ ~ .~.s 1!
, ........~.. .0.1:.0 " .".s oS c "s '., .... ........ u:! oS" g, S 0. Q, .. ... ;:: 10:
..... - 0.... "0 .. "0 - .. ." ....... .... c: c -.. 0 _ 0 0 _ >.
{9 ; e 0 ~ 8 ~ ~ 8 :l ....... ... .0 X >-. e 1i ~ "'8: l! :I 0. ~ ~ .0 5
' 1<.'.:' ......"Cl S 0.:1 llQ >-. .0 !!l' &'0 8 <...i ~ e i e- " .'" .. _ 0 :l .. U _. ';; 8-
I>; 31 0. II ... .0'" C ~',:2 -a ..... ......~ il 0....... .. e _:l 'i ... 0 ~ .. ~
I>~ .~ ~ oS i ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ 1/ .....1 g ~.~~.. ~ .; .~ j ~ ~ i >-. i e i
:..:'d ~.. c ... U._ =...:. ......1 !.! "u -!'l 0. "0 - :l l! ::: c"
. .. ......... ~ ] c.. i! "'8 8 ~ e~. 8 ....... ...... ......~ c.eo .. &l "51 ~ "g -.; ! !!" 11 5 ~ 5-
.:: ~ 3 ~ c .. oS .o.!l l::. c....... .... Q, Q,':; Q.., ;; i:j ':;',:2 ..:: ... l:: ~ U 'C 31
... .0 U:a .- e Q, .. ~ .; c c....... ..... ..... e ".. .. U .. .. e ... .. ".0
..!.I~i!!~ll~ .. . ...... ........ . ... ...... C............,l.... c ~ i.. 8 .! 0 o:r" .s .............. '. ".i .!.:; .! "'8 .! oS .! .! .. 0 .! c a
..... I<<{rl.......~.. >;E &. 5 ~ .; e- u ~ 2' e ~ g < ~ c ~.. .. ~ ~ l!! > ~ ~ .~ ~ &. "0
>~ ~ U 0,;::; ~ It ~ ~ Q, ::::a U <<~ Ii; 0 -<.s ~ -< ~ 8 ~ ~ Ii; U ~ ~;
...... ...... ....... .... -<.....; ......; ..; .,.; .0 , 1= ....;.... ..;..;.,.; .0 r-: 00 ~:::
/ F~'~!i~ / / {
-<>.F < I. ........
'.
.
Cl\ -
- 8
\Q 8
I 0
l"-
I 8
8 8
I I
-
"'
... QIIi ..
..s ~ >.'c
...; .>II ...9
... c::.. ~
e :s "'>t 0
'S ~ ,~ -S >.
[..; ~ u = ;
E .. :; ..
... u o ~ e:'.a
.. ~ "e ' .. >
1! = ..: 2>2
.. 0 9 .. 0 c::..
u c::..~~
if"! u b .. ~
e ... .,,-
~ '6'0 ;: o v u ..
>. 'C 0 2"'~ .J:> ;::
.. 0 u c::.. 5 C ~
c::.... .s '0 ~ g.~
--S
!g >. ge~u
.J:>
~ 11 ." .~ fr - 4)
.. ~ ~ 6 ~
~ ~ ." r::....d
'S: 'C ~ <Jl .:
.. ... 2 ~ '2' 8 ,g
~'E. c::..
>.11 ~ . ~ ~ ~
e .. g c: .~
- e ." .~ -8 ~ g
~ '': ." a';J >. ...
...." U _ u .~ cS
o = ..: ~ " c ... .
>." = 0.", ;l 9 =
0
.~ 8 c::.. u >. ... u ..:
U 'C = ~.'":: u ~ C.
.. c::.. 1 'C u -s = =
-s .. = .s ... 8 ,g
u .. ." 0 u
9 e .J:> ~>'''''a
= ;: ... 'C.J:> ~ -s !
o 0 ~
'.::l u '!i 9 ~ c::.. 9 0
..-
1!. e '2:'.a ~ frl U
~ >.. ..
~ ~ ." 2 ..~-S
'.::l i! ;:c::..g>.~
o ~ 0 ~ .8 ....J:> 'C
e~ e 'w; = l"'S ~
~ ~ ... e'~ c::.. E ."
0 .. .5 .. a ~
~] i :'.a...:=e~
1! g, ~ ei~.8!
.. = P- c::.. S = :l
~~ g := >. ~ .~ .~
~ ~~'8,~~
M l! c::.. ~ U .. . M
..2..: e u'8~:l~
u .. .. u 'C .;:; :I .;:;
e e .. ~ "'8 l:l
:'.a c.._ _
.. ..
c::..c::.. ~
~ ~ Iii
- ~ S
- z
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ATTACHMENT B
P-1199
CLIENT.....................CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DATE OF ESTIMATE........... 12-19-91
LABOR MULTIPLIER........... . 3.00'
PROJECT NAME...............MASTER PUMP STATION DESIGN DIRECT MULTIPLIER.......... 1.0
***************...***************************************************************************..****.*.**********.*****************
LABOR COST DETAIL
-----------------
TASK 1: TASK 2: TASK 3A: TASK 3B: DIRECT MULTI
PRELIM. FINAL BIDDING CONSTRUCT TOTAL LABOR LABOR
LABOR CLASS RATE DESIGN DESIGN ASSISTANCE ASSISTANCE HOURS COST COST
--------------- .------..- -----.--- ----------- -...-.------ --..-..--..-- ----- ----.....- ---...........
PROJECT MANAGER $29.00 57 84 14 47 202 $5,858 ~.l!,574
SENIOR ENGINEER $22.00 31 111 18 107 267 $5,874 $17,622
ENGINEER $17 . 00 176 697 77 m 1723 529,291 S87,873
TECHNICIAN $14.00 64 310 38 40 452 $6,328 S18,984
DRAFTER (CADD) 510.00 102 730 70 70 972 $9,720 529,160
CLERICAL $10.00 29 88 73 141 331 $3,310 S9,930
------ ------ ------ ------ ...-.--.. ---.--- ............ ...
SUBTOTAL LABOR HOURS 459 2020 290 1178 3947 $60,381
SUBTOTAL RAW LBR DOLLARS $7,533 529,247 S4,073 519,528 S181,143
SUBTOTAL TOT LBR DOLLARS $22,599 S87,741 512,219 $58,584
*********************************************************************************************************************************.
OTHER DIRECT COSTS DETAIL ACTUAL MULTI
ITEM DESCRIPTION -.--...--..-..-----..--...--..--- ODC ODC
---------..--..--- ----..--- ..-.......-.....
TELEPHONE (long dist8~~only) $50 $50 $20 $100 $220 5220
REPROD./PRINTING 5300 $700 $100 $600 $1,700 S1,700
PERMIT FEES (PAID BY CITY) $0 $0 $0 $0 SO SO
------ ..-..--- ------ ----...- .--.-..- ........-..--
SUBTOTAL DIRECT $ 5350 $750 $120 $700 S1,920
SUBTOTAL. MULT DIR $ $350 5750 $120 $700 S1,920
**********************************************************************************************************************************
EXTERNAL ASSOCIATES COST DETAIL ACTUAL MULTI
ASSOCIATE ------------------------------- ODC COC
--------- ---..--.... --------
S.T.I., Inc. 50 $18,000 SO $6,000 $24,000 S24,OOO
RMI, Inc. SO $19,900 SO 55, 100 $25,000 525,000
EMA, Inc. SO $14,920 SO $6,396 S21,316 $21,316
BOSWORTH AERIAL SURVEYS $4,695 $0 SO $0 S4,695 $4,695
------ ------ ------ ------ ------- .... - -....-
$4,695 $52,820 $0 $17,496 575,011 $75,011
**********************************************************************************************************************************
TOTAL LABOR, ODC's &
EXTERNAL ASSOCIATES $27,644 $141,311 $12,339 $76, 780 $258,074
'.
..
ill }\
~ III If:' I ;.
;~~illl~ I.
i~1I I I I
..i)
.....
.................../)
........ ) :l
. ...,~ :~ 1 g t>
.. .. Ie us'" ... '" ,- II:
.. ... ~ ;. ,- .5 ..':: u :!
, ). ...... )/ i !" i ~ l:l" J 1 ~ 8 ~ ~
......) .tii J 1,,8 8:1 ,!::l J:i.tl;'; a 1 1
.!)! 'il a 11 ':I :> ,J i i 'i ,~I
. ' 1% .s ~~ l{ ci! ~ j 16 ~~ I I
. ' >. 1%11::: ..: III cj ci iii u: ci :=.. '.
~~.;;<\J.:,;:;.'\!t:"i<'~ ~ ,..',.~<,;:}~(
.~f,t .~(. ., .,'. " .' .,' {-;~.
. "-." ,.. . '. '. ' ' ~-. :.,''\0
Iii
Ii
< ,
.......1 I I I?
;.,...,..
................ ... > I).). '.,
i.. ... 1/
I>ii/)
i
...,-....-
,) I
i
<
);,)
.....1 1<
.....>
i
.. .......
) I~I
...... I
I)> il>/ I · ·
..ii .............
........\i>>
. i... I
>. .... 1./ .
" .
!tw :g I I ·
1~~~}};;}le.J l 1 13.
....., / ~ ~ i! J ~ a J Ie '"
.... '. ... I......> .!! ~ .. ~ I" ~ .il iii
......... Iii J ~ a 1 ~ ~ ~ a j] j l! i: e ~
' '.. ,3 ] ,g ,a..:;) ,l! I ~ ~ 'i ~.e ~ ~
~ ;~ -~ I " I ~I ~ ~ if ~ ij ~ ~
li)l ~] ~ ~ d ;lj ~.; ~ ~ J ~ j j 1;B ~ J
',' '...'. li.I ....~.c iii u ci iii ~ ci = ool ~ 1ol.J
'~..:.; ~~
~~...;'_.
o.
I I I I T I
I -
-
-
-
-
L-
-
-
-
-
I 1
-
..-
-
r --
-
IIF<
.
,"} I I --- -
ill I I I I
. -'
" -~
Ii ..
iii 1<./
............... i..i....<i..'...}.... II .....
". . ,,. 'I;
I .k< U '3 '3
. .. b ,<i'.!! 1 1 ~
'. II: 4ii ~ · · '.1 ~ "
.". c' I .;~i/ ...........:1. 1 .. is 'i! J!!l '" loll
. " 0". ...
... .. ,,- .0 _ , l'll . a. ,,. Q
,.'..:~:,",. ........ . ~ ~ '! ~ .. s ,l! '" U ~
,',. .. ..... I > .. .. . i >. .
"/:':;;"-'.;:':'0. .;. ....... ~i<i.'.'.':J:.l.. ~:s ,4 'll f 1:a 5'~ 1 'i
1t.'W" .j T · · u. ,."..
" ;.;:'j)jt".,,: ' ... . i/ ., .. < · & · ·
~,,~O. . ' . ·
.,..."~;";'i;,~ 77 .! 1,>\1 < I IIli I ' . ~
. 'I U Q .
loll ~ ci:=
-
-
j: ' -;.>:,y:;;,:~
. . ......-..
-. ..
,
,>
,> >
..>> ....,.
I".
I
,...
. I
. I
I>
1\ ";
!/Ii
."11<>11.
'i>
>
x,>
/ " ......
'.'......
,II II~
>
,
>/ .
..lIi I~I
'i
1/> .
\> :> I ....
< i., ..... ......".......
..". >
.> ~ r. . 1
, s ! ..,
i 'Ii',.. lii
It: i .:l 'a ! II
i a s s 1> s
tf) j J 6 ~ ,C ] ..!
" " = ~
., .." .. H~! l:- " u :z: .., is ..,
'II U ~ '. <. lii -.: G <<3 i
l!l j ~a ill ~i
, :. .g ril ~ -~ ' J :1 J: ~
> > I i 'i I~ g~ ~ ~ ~
~ 1 1 'i Ij u .~ ..g ~
... , J: ~~ '> ~ a ~
..,.... /,/ / Ii: Ii: uu ~~ is ~
" ! < ..
> iii ',u Q iii y; ci 8~ >.a.> ... ..; . -n -G
"
..............................
1......\
1\
.\ ..
...... ,
)
) .
.
(
!II'
I il · ·
III~
)>
I) ..
Iii
i hi
I
I _ .
.
) I
....
>.
ii; '.llt'i> .
i.> IF.
.' /) IHi
>i)
>
i.
ii>() _
) ~ ;. .g l g l:.s g Q
>>~ .i\ ~. '~ i ~ '! i ~ ,j ~ 'l~ 1 -
) !i ...~ g 1i a Q 1i 1i ~ ,;a k A 1 I ,r
...i ...>.,' .... ..........._ '~.. 'po'~ t l 'po ~ If ~ g ~ g
"oiL .f 1 ~ 11 II; II '" ... It Ii:.... -< II 1 'll II Q,~
>i) ~> ......................1.. ~ ~ i ,~~ ,~ 1 ,~ 'I ,~ l '~l j I 1 1 i
..... . .... S>>) g.f l,) ~!' ~ :I ,;a jlI\ ell .f ell II: .il.:l Ii: ~ It
I i.\> .... ,8
. .')> ............". ....!, . ...,... d ..; ri
~ .....~. ~ - N ~. ~ ~ ~ . ~ _ __
.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
CITY OF DELRAY nEACH
CONSULTING SERVICE AUTHORIZATION No.3
DATE:
SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
CITY P.O. NO. CITY EXPENSE CODE
PROJECT NO.:
CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH PEC DB..()4
TITLE: IN-LINE BOOSTER MASTER P.S.: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
This service authorization, when executed, shall be incorporated in and shall become an integral part of the
Contract, Dated December 4, 1991, by and between the City of Delray Beach and .PEC.
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The objective of this assignment is to provide construction plans, specifications and related bidding documents
for the construction of the new In-Line Booster Master Pump Station for the City of Delray Beach. The new
Master Pump Station (MPS) and a small submersible pump station located at or near Veteran's Park will
replace the existing station located within Veteran's Park at the intersection of East Atlantic Avenue and the
Intercoastal Waterway. The basis of this Scope of Work and design development for the In-Line Booster MPS
is the City/Consultant meeting held December 6, 1991, and subsequent discussions with the City Staff
outlining the general scope of the project more specifically described as follows:
1. In-Line Booster Master Pump Station <L.S. 100),
. At grade structure; "slab on grade".
. Multiple horizontal end suction centrifugal sewage pumps (3@ :t 150 hp or 4 @ :t 100 hp)
. Multiple speed drives (VFD Q[ two or three speed pumps).
. Overhead bridge crane for pump/motor removal.
. Roll-up garage door at rear of building.
. Motor Control Center to be separate room environmentally controlled (air conditioned).
. Suction and discharge piping to be concrete encased under floor slab (no pipe trenches).
. Pump separation of 5 feet 0 inches minimum.
. No bathroom facilities.
. Transformer mounted outside of building.
. Pump room finish to be sound block or double CMU wall at contractors option.
. Motor drives, instrumentation equipment and electrical subcontractor(s) to be pre-qualified.
. Emergency generator room to be finished with hospital grade acoustical panels. Muffler to be critical
hospital grade. Exterior acoustical wall baffle to be provided at radiator exhaust louver.
. All piping shall be contained within building.
. By-pass with check valve accessible within building.
. Booster Pump operator controlled by DFS SCADA system and back-up Pump Controller.
2. Force Main Improvements
. New force main from L.S. #1 to existing 24-inch influent force main (suction header); 2400 L.F. 20-
inch DIP.
. Manifold 12" force main from L.S. #8 and to-inch force main from L.S. #looA into existing 24-inch
'.
influent force main (suction header); 100 L.F. to-inch, 80 L.F. 12-inch PVC and 100 L.F. 16-inch
DIP.
. Extension of existing 16" force main (intercoastal waterway crossing) into existing 24-inch influent
force main (suction header); 400 L.F. 16-inch DIP.
. Extension of existing 6-inch force main from L.S. #5 into existing 24-inch influent force main; 550
L.F. 6-inch PVC.
. Extension of existing lO-inch force main from L.S. #4 into existing F.M. #11 (to be reversed); 1200
L.F. lO-inch PVC.
. Repipe F.M. #11 into L.S. #11 (for repumping) and connect L.S. #11 discharge into 30-inch influent
force main (discharge header).
3. L.S. l00A - 724 gpm (Deak flow) dQplex submersible pump station located at or near Veteran's Park
. Provide emergency receptacle only for portable generator set.
. Provide misting system in wetweII for odor control.
. Upon deactivation of existing Master Pump Station relocate recently City purchased GAC odor control
equipment to L.S. 100A housed in a small single building.
II. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Provide the design and construction plans, specifications and related bidding documents for the construction
of the new In-Line Booster MPS, duplex submersible station (L.S. l00A) and various manifold force main
improvements. The development of this assignment consists of three (3) primary activities and sub-tasks as
follows:
A. Preliminary Design: Evaluation of existing conditions, establish design criteria, coordination of
geotechnical investigation and surveying coordination with Veteran's Park Renovation design, preparation
of preliminary design drawings, specifications and construction cost estimates.
B. Final Design: Preparation of Contract Drawings, specifications and final cost estimate, preparation and
submittal of FDER permit application, 30%, 60% and 90% completion level reviews with City Staff and
Valve Engineering consultant to the City of Delray Beach.
C. Construction Administration: Prepare preconstruction conference booklet, periodic site observation,
review shop drawings, attend monthly progress meeting, prepare change orders. review pay requests. and
close out.
Detailed Scope of Services is included in Attachment "A".
III. BUDGET
The following services shall be paid on the basis of the following methods in accordance with the Contract
Agreement. the total not to exceed $258.074 without further authorization from the City:
Task Activity Basis of Payment Budget
1 Preliminary Design Lump Sum $ 27.644
2 Final Design Lump Sum 141.311
3A Bidding Assistance Hourly Time Charges 12.339
JR Construction Phase Assistance Hourly Time Charges 76,780
Budget Total $258,074
Detailed Manhour and Budget estimates are included in Attachment "B".
The Consultant shall be reimbursed for additional services not included in the above basic fees, such as but
,
not limited to: special permitting, additional printing, property surveys, preparation of O&M Manuals and
resident services during construction, not to exceed an amount of Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000). These
additional services shall be approved by the City, in writing, on- an item per item basis.
IV. COMPLETION DATE
The preliminary design activity shall be completed within 60 calendar days from Notice to Proceed and the
overall design activity shall be completed within 140 calendar days from the receipt of this fully executed
service authorization (Notice to Proceed) or from receipt of City provided information which will enable PEC
to proceed with this Scope of Work.
The remaining completion schedule for this assignment is estimated as follows:
Bidding & Award of Contract: 45 Calendar days from Bid Advertisement by City
Construction Phase: 250 Calendar days from Construction Notice to Proceed
Detailed Completion Schedule is included in Attachment "C".
This service authorization is approved contingent upon the City's acceptance of and satisfaction with the completion
of the services rendered in the previous phase or as encompassed by the previous service authorization. If the City
in its sole discretion is unsatisfied with the services provided in the previous phase or service authorization, the City
may terminate the contract without incurring any further liability.
..
APPROVED BY THE CITY OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING
DELRA Y BEACH CONSULTANTS, INC.
- DAY OF . 1992 BY:
R. Craig Batterson. P .E.
Type or Print
Date: (SEAL)
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, a municipal
corporation of the STATE OF FLORIDA A TrEST:
BY:
MAYOR BEFORE ME, the foregoing instrument, this _ day of
, 1991, was acknowledged by -R...
Craifl Batterson ,
A TrEST: ,
a duly authorized officer of Professional
Engineering Consultants. Inc.
BY: on behalf of the Corporation and said person executed the same free
and voluntarily for the purpose therein expressed.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY: WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and
City Attorney State aforesaid this _ day of , 1991.
Notary Public
State of Florida
My Commission Expires:
(SEAL)
~: 1;1 III II. I~I m 1.1. W I~ ' ---- 0(
U CD
t .PROPOSED 16" DIP FORCE MAIN
. IS hrri ffi ~~ ~ - .~-- $(--
--Ef: ,
l- I
CO_NN_ECT TO EXISr. Z I
l 2410 INFLUENT F.M.- -
l' l:~~-- N 1" ::I 400'
, . I
I
,
__ _ _ ~ ,..__dJ
T LAN T I --f----------
, 1. r
PROPOSED L.S. 100A
.~.^.._---~ ._- -
,"If' WITH MANIFOLD PIPING::
I
I
I >- .- .. .-
.....,. ~ I ..-
<:( -.. .-
I
I $ wo-
.-
, .-
I n::- o- --
I ..
lo.I iii I lJ.J
> 2- I .
lIl: ..,.., ST. ...,. ____..1__ I-
lo.I ....,. ----
en F -.
101 58<:(
lIl: :r' co 'I
Q I S
~ ., I -.. --
0 F I
~ I
~ III I l' --
- --
lIl: ~ " I .-
-.. ..-
w-
W W ..
U ., lO-
W iii iii I -J
r..: - I -<:(
I LS
- I I- 17
'...-'- - " .,.. .... I (/)
'0 '0
u. JJ.. t. c c I .-
:> :> ~
0 ., 0 I
., ~ JJ J:J I 'iJI
:5 ~ I 0 e-
:>
0 ., I
VI z U 0-
. --
'I' I '.
, ~ .-
" 'I' I a::
III III I
ci ci I f--
0& .. Z z I
~- Z II
ow
I -
.
,
I
I 0_
--
PROPOSED 20" DIP FORCE MAIN
...
Ii Ii
iii iii
,.-
III -
-.. .. - .-
.. -
G 1.1 -
-........ ""
LOT X w
... .. - ..
... - ...
-- .. ... - .~t
-.. III
.-- 10
.. 10
- A f'
"
... · -E~H~:'~ 1-:r
.. ..
..-, >- lit
--. ... ..
..- - <( Z
-< · I .,
':l ..
..
'" J_
~ " ,... . " II ~IU I !i I. 7 McKEE LANE ~
,.. "'.. . .. ' H . v".a .. ~
.. ~~ u~fi ~ ..J If
Ul,l J ! !,t I ! ! B U ,! . a
,. ,M loa ~ I - , ~~ If
I. s I.
,.. 11} .:. ~: ;I:
J ' !I r: Iii: - 17 ~ 1M
11 a ! .. ~ ! Il r.. I ~
"'I 14S
7 "'r -- .
u A a II. ! ~ a!!I~R 31\ ::;~~ 143:11 III \I ~ ~ !:~. I
III 'JW In ,( I II) 't II. 'it" . . ~
~ I ~ o' '40' la:: II r-... ~
~ Z I" l'
178 ..,. .'1 ".. ~O.J 1. 1
G I I !I .. n!!; I! I; a ; :: ~ ~. 7' I &:! )...L
V ~ D~' NE."__.. -. '-Ur .,...!/
. !' Ii ...;:!' ;Y .. ~~ . .oo
~ ~, 11 -. j
~ . '" , 0, ..
I.~ ~'~ ... ::I I '
· L-- au
Ii to LS4. zu:J . NT.... iF ... ...
· . ,.........:;;.: IlC .
- · (. .. '0 In · ,., · , ,
. "... '- '" 'r ~~ . ;
· I ,. · Jf1!!.' 0.' - · l ~ ~ . 0 1" = 400 ~
4' 0" '<=<; 'J - !. ,I-o'~r · " ~
us IW J. N~
. I · ,~ ~ - -... . --" , . ""
~ ~ '" at ~ "JIIO~ 1!. s: t
. ,;;~, < I'" ,..... I.. ....
~ I' · o-:d ... i · ~ l- ~ .-!.. . . <
"J .. Ill': 'J..' - C
'.... ~. lor... '10 II. 1\' 1 .. ..,
"" Q. m 10 n I fa --C- I
~ '. /!( !!! J ,. ~.. .. ~ ,,,..-1-=- ,r; :lLS.,.? u <-
' I=,,"". . -on- 0 ! - N lH '<:{
'" ~ \"r e-lft; \ TERRACE u ~ ~ - - ,-' i '! !! T II to
~ '-') ~ Ii II -- ~ .. .=--- ~' ,;q;:<' 17 '_ 1 ft
'" , II _ _ ~ 0 .:J
...:'" t o. - '.... 0 -, ~ ~. 0.. 0.. .. - ..... 0::
ob;. Q> U' _ III .,. e ...,u, 0 ' 151 Ii 1 II I--
,.- lip Z 1 f a:
. " I . ,o:a, III ....... 111 I" JI. "- ~ I Z
~.. II": .. Ii ~ _I !H! '.lIIII"" __.. '. i!: 2.... III ~ : r.. ~ .
(" $ . .1' ~. ~ · '<'0 · · ~ I' '....1 -
'\. 'al I'" , CD . __ I....-- L...- ~
112 H ~ :! II ~ i:l ~ ~ ~TW---..T...J . _.. lOO"
' - - ~ . '.
'Ir, ... 18 .. 111 "' ,...." ~.. '1 < ~ 1 f-o
~ V II _ .n i, 1 ~'" ~~ ,~<n~~ I~ ';
.. ~.. 'i'!.. : PROPOSED 10. PVC FORCE MAIN ~l
""..i_~~.s lH -,;,,\ r:T T a iP I" i,.Jo TI: Ill" i!: "~; i!: It
· !Il" ." I I I 1- · o.!.. o.! J 'm ~. . . · ~_
I IOJ · Z.M. J:~ z , '>0 "I l ')0 I I ~
I.. '01 ':11 ] I. j lJ I 'bI l.J 11 .
In In . I . z"
.! · · ~ II' I! .. .. l 1&.' I .. ~ Z ,.; ,;It t..
i "..14 ...1:.. _ .-- . ~ ..... .,.. '" wjOP-. _-te "" -.r 4 TH ,J
"; ra l!l I to = ': I! .. 11 .. , I O! ~ a I 1
,. :: /'-..."': In I.' I.
.. .... I.. ~ IU ...
Il' .. '-1.. '
...!- _ ... r.: ./ ~ ~ III ~IU, ~ _ _ I' .;.:..;...'
- - .. .~. x..... ~
.... -
~ -". " = i ~ ~ : - PROPOSED 6" rVC
,,- II. .., I.! :) FORCE MAIN
,.. 1= IN I. ~----
: 1-0'. I- tIe'- I II ;: I I I- >-
.. J-. I' ~
. 141 J -. - ,.110 I I )
- :!ioiF- _.c'~=_=~_ -.::"___.,:, ~~_ .$-
=~~- _~.A""""'" '{ j r I 1l~1-Tn=" !<' ~.S.3 0:::
" "J 'L-. PROPOSED L.S. 100 . <( Lu
I L ' , (ILBMPS) SITE iE l-
. '"
'.1 I ...J I + 11111 M- I J " l. ~ ~
- ", ~ CONNECT TO EXIST. "- 1_____
J~ ; I ,t CONNECT TO EXIST.
0 i F.M. 11 (REVe-FfsE FLOW) 2~~ ~NFLMEN",: F.M.
Z ..
N ~Jl.I,/" ..-i'1 J_~~ ,l
~ ,rN.E. ... .,. ,... . '.1 -= T.
...c;..; ,. ..- -, I I.J -J
"
Of '" ' I ~ I" ~
'~ "I '4 III ~
I c:i
J Z I
I - It C/1 n
I~ '( l..' EXHIBIT 2
~' i N.tw' T ~
: IIJ ) 'I:J \I I
, c:
Nt :;I -,
"- "', .. ..... .".! Hp ''''I'y-t'~:tt. I : .! -;"~
. < I
RACF' 0 I
II II . W ^ ~ It' ,. ~ I
'N a - I; ~ ;~ '\ _ "7 It II ~ t jj I! 31
., ..~ ~ _ 01.. - ~
I ~ ,..~ '11 ,..~..-? I /- --
~ . as:: ! ill!!.. ....... '" '" I. !i
II · I!I II'! I%'!'{/ · '. .. Jr
,. .. ~ ..t 11 " '~ ..
rIM '.1;. at..
. - i-- I I.! 1/, :: II I I: .!. .n - ~ ,..
J 1 · o. C~NNECT L.s.)1Dr~CH;R~E :.,~~' · .. ; @
, II loS. 'Ja8 INTO EXIST.. 30" F.M. _ /)/" I !:: II i ~
~ (rn. _____TV'..... ~ ~. "" ;; · I L ....t , ~z. ,.. WI '
. 1, Bi~ I; SI! I ii~~~ 21Ei~ !l! :
- I'''~
.... D"---..f LAKE IDA R'OAU --~-----:-1 \ i ~ I i a
~_______~'" ,....J.. Em
.,,' "'-.. J:"
_ e... ~ ..n.
~ L..S. ~ II r. ~,. ...
." .. II II r: ... i(~, Wft 'I
Q I - ; I -.- ~ - -Ir 'uw J
,.., ,.. ,., ...J ~ ,.!_~' · -- B' J. 11! I ~. ;;~: I I---
, .J. .. ~ .. _ _ ..- f--o . ,. II '. '" '1U
~ J +~.. -- -- -,,, ,.. - ,~
[' - - .- '-..... - -
-- - - -- -.. -- "
f-_ .- .- _a' '" Iii -- .__ ,~.-
-,. --.... - - ' ,
I __ f-- ._ .-. · - .. ~
-- 1" 400' · - .. II ..
.Jt - - = - -.. .... - - -- ~: - liw '. '..
-- .. -.. .. - -- --.. -
, _, ",,-'W' It ._ ,.. ...'" " -
- . .' . -- -- .- .- ~.
. _ __ -. '_... ...-... .. _..J8 .-.. __ 1M 1- . -
_ ~ ... _ -DO lit U -no na ftn I ,.
~ .) __ . ... .. ... _0" IN... .........
.. .. .. . -- I ..
no. ~- .. .," lit ;- AI r
- --- -- ~ '--
" -.- - --N:w~--~ -=;:- --- rJI:,.,.. .~ "_- ~----_.
LS · .l. J,.-- r . 1 J :- J I J.. -.:.. J ." l:
13 Ill.... .-.. 7')1- 1- ,,_'- l!. "' -
. _ ,.--... ~' ,... :1=....... ,... ,.. ,. ~
· <-. ... -.. ~ I · D - -- -- .. Il ~
~ -n, ._
__ --... . _.., .._ III ~ ,.. ar
__, .. -... - f- I. ..
Iii - :_::: := _ ':': REVERSE FLOW iN F.ht' 11 ~ ::>
..... . -, _n .. - =~t - II .. n. I ,~ f4i It
1-- "_ ,. .. t"." II
.... ..- >.-_ "L. -.. '-.... .. - -- ,"" '. I,...... __
.. .. - D_ -. U. 1._ II.. '
~ ,1._ 'l-.. ~ U' r ,.-
_ r-.. I .. _ 1M .,.--
. ",_ i ,.....- - ~, ~....,. " ~ "'''1fI I ! ! ~
~ ~ ~ 0--. ,.), 'J ......U__ NoW." l ,1iN0r_
, - -- -.. - - ! " l-I..J !,~ . J.L. ~ I :
..._ __.... _;~ ' . -- R...... _ ~__ I _ J7l.. = ·
.. 1-- ,~=.. - ~ -- or, __ I. ~.. '" - ..
.. &II _ _ wr_ ir= ... ..
,..-... . - ,...;: ,-... ,._ rP ..... .... ,. ,. ... ~
_ L.- -I. I.
- ~_ __ r- IM-.. .._ __ ..- ...", I. f. '. 'M"
... - .. - 1-.. ._ _.. ._ _ . _..: .." .. _". .
"._ .. __ 1-- .- -=: .- -... ,.....
. - ...... I. __. ..
,._ f-D .. - I _..- _ ' -- -lot ... _ ... ." .. = _ ...
P> . ' -Ie .. _ --.... II .,.
L-.. IN - r-" I __.. -.. ,.;.. I. ~
.. ~,.-- - ' -.. .- .. -. ,.. ..!!!;-
, .. '-- ....- \B. _. .. -... ,. - '... ~, "
-- ... _:-.,. Ui tII_- -.. - .. - ... ... 'M .41.'
-),.., ~ ,"""'., '-,,'1""'l!!......, ..."'... --"II" _ .=;; I. .' "'" .1.... b
J I ... ';- ':' ' 11,11 - - II
_ - I I I J-J 1"'" -..1 =~ Jaw Jr
--- I.... .- _.. .~ ,_.J. J..-, i ,~l..I,.~ I J I~ 11,~ JIT. J-~ II I I: 'I:! ~ !. C! ! I ,..:::::
..- 0 : -- ~f-" :: ~ .'-" ....- N;;;; .at ... ~.. ,. 'D ~"'1t ." ~~ N '"
__ N ...... ~ _ _~j'-_ ,,: I, . _ .... - ,. ,. 1I "' '. ~
...-.....r] ..~ . Z I -- ..- _, ..- ~ .. '"... Ill.' '.. .10
, .-"... tot- ,I--:' .:, ~ "'_...... "-" .' .... ct II ~
_,. ,., _"..r.... 0" .... ..
- -".. - ,,- -~. ,.
-- I .- -,. , .. - - ..... ~ ..... '"'N
_ ... ..). _I" .._ _---, _,. .. - _. f.., .,":'\..... I.. 'n.~ 'M::' .. ...
, -I<, .JII -......_ 1-.,. : .11111 ! ! Il.. 1. · _..~.. EXHIBIT 3 I o!l
.. ,. lOt .-"-:;; 1---8; ~~~.,. ........ I! U ; E Yo
_ .IL l~. I Dr I
'?
"
l",,~l;';'l i~.~ll;. A 't~_ll ::t:..J.....I.::,~_.~J ~,II 1 - 1.1.' r-.:$.l. 1'1 u '=' ~ '-, II
1.1",-
RM'I
It ,. ... II LI II I' I M "N "I. I MINI
1 NI l. II iii " T I II N ^ I. , J N (',
....
December 11, 1991,
REVISED Dcct'.J1\bcr 19, 1991
Art Austin, P .E,
Professional Engineering Consultants
Eola Park Center' .
200 E Robinson Street, Suite 1560
Orlando, FL 32801
Subject: City of Delray Beach In-Line Booster Pumping Station
Electl1cal and Instrumentation Engineering Services
RMl #98000-33
Dear Art:
Pursuant to your request, we are pleased to submit a proposal for the electrical engineering
services associated with the subject project,
Our proposal reflects the design and construction phase work effort. The manhour
breakdown by task and personnel for each phase is as follows:
PUMPiNG SfATION I;;I..F.Cl'RlCAL
DESiGN PHASE
-
DRAWING ENGINEER ~ CLERICAL
El Electrical Legend 1 1 .0-
E2 Single Line & Schematic Diagrams 32 16 -0-
E3 Electrical Equipment plan 40 24 -0-
E4 Lighting, Receptacle & Grounding Plan 16 8 -0-
ES Electrical Detail 16 16 -0-
E6 Electrical Schedules 16 8 .0-
Specifications - Division 16 16 -o- S
TOTAL ELECfRlCAL DESIGN 137 73 8
.1,
1:1J.' S< IlJllIl'l IN(,RP;<; A VI'NIII" ~llnEI-A , \'VI:.'i1 I'^, M BI'.^LII, 1',. :n4\1o . (-1\17' %H-1tl1)() . FA ~ (40'/1 M I-K5J8
,.
.I..:.;. .&.;/,':~.L J. '" ; U /;I ... 't.J t j!;.'Q""J~J~J t'", ~ I 1 - 1.1,1 t"" d ! 1'1 b J? d t':' r I U'"
Art Austin, P.E,
December 11, 1991,.
lUNISnD December 19, 1991
Page 2
CONsTRuCTION PHASE
ENGINEER
Review Shop Drawings 16
Two (2) Field Yisils
(2 at 4 hours) 8
Answer Contractor's Questions 16
TOTAL CONSTRUCl"lON PHASB 40
UIT STATION ELECiRJCAI.
DESIGN PHASE
DRAWING ENGINEER CAD CLF;RlCAL
El Single Line & Schematic & Layout 16 8 -0-
CONSTR.UCTION PHASE
ENGINEER
Review Shop Drawings 4 .
One (1) Field Visit 4
Answer Contractor's Questions 4
TOTAL CONSnlUCfION PIIASF. 12
OUf proposed lump sum fees for the scope of work described herein are as follows:
ELECfRlCAL DESIGN PHASE $11,600,00
ELECTIUCAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE $4,000.00
LIFT STATION ELECTRlCAL DESIGN $2,300.00
LIFT STATION CONSTRUCTION PHASE $1,100.00
~ OUf proposal has been based on providing all drafting on Auto-Cad with plan footprints
provided by PEe.
RMI
..
Ll/19/'~1 12:07 2i: 4t1i';lb~4':1U'j i<:/'u-w r',;df'l bo?<io:.h
,-',+
,
Art Austin, P .E.
December 17, 199J
REVISED Decembf".r 19, 1991
Page 3
RMI will prepare cable and conduit schedule for instrumentation and control cables.
lnstnunentation engineer shall provide P&I drawings and locations of all devices. Interface
between RMI and instrumentation engineer shall be at the motor control center.
Instrumentation Engineer will develop control strategies and specify pump station control
panel. .
Instrumentation Engineer shall specify the required new Data Flow Sysrem'-s equipment and
interface with the existing system.
Please contact me if you have any questions conceming tllls proposal or our understanding
of the scope of work required.
Sincerely,
~C.~
John C, Burke
-
,s"
UUI
"
.1.Jt=..'--~J..o-~..l ~.~ L .LI ..L .;J _ "_I ...:- ...... t-.t
-' .' ..... . '1 1_" .
1-. _ "J J.
. ,
BOSWORTH AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.
"''''olo9rammelric qOn.Sllllanl,' .
TC~EPIlON' ..
9654-i77 "Ii noon.-rl IIC DUll DING
AnllA COOl 407 .OS7IAKE wonlll nn"D
AX (407) 9GS-4~82 LAlli WV"'H, F~OftIDA :t:I41t .38911
REC~'VED
DEe 1 81991
. P.Le. 'NC. ORLAtIJO
WORK copy Iv N
\ ~ - 1 ~- CLI ORIGINATOR'
DATE: ONE copy . ROUTE TO:
TO: fl\r. ~9r)+ \J~Rr~
I FILE
ORIG.
TO
FROM: ~~rru ~~S\)..."')C"lcA-
~ .
NUMBER OF PAGES: ~
,
SUBJECT: ":l: L '? rn s - Q.\.:bj 0 Ph \ro..'l "&~~ ~
&v\rof'\. ~v'C16S .
. ,
-
I R:u~ ., ~; ~\\,\ ~ py-Oce~\:J -:f \ '2.4 C; . 00
l4- i -zoo.oo -$ 'lboo .00
, L" ::= rzo' el~ -? Pn> -h Ie.. e
l ~t1 -=- w' ~r\: 1- P\~ @ ~ '2fh,oo ~ -ZG:,?CO
,_ o~
~ 1\ I ~~\ f/\d1A €... ~ '306.CO t (poo .00
I -::=-1 0
t
$. ~ 4~Cco.C(:) 'f 4Co~S.OO
~
-
-
.
, ',:
,. ""
....... -- '-- ..... '-' -' ... ........ '-- ~. ..a.. _' .. ,_, ..:... ~. , . - ...... I I '_ ..
. _ a-_, ~
BOSWORTH AE;RIAl.. SURVEYS, INC,
'PI,otog,'ammelritJ COll.sl,ltania
M;AOGRAPIo4IC .UII.OING
TllI.E"'HON~ ("07) ets5.....7' '" ..05,. LAI<E WORTH I'lOAl:I
""'1( (.In) ee5......2 LAKE WORTH, F"1.0RIOA 33.....3S1Q!:J
December lS, 1991
~
M.r. Kent Veech
Professional Engineering Consultants
EOLA Park Centre
200 East Robinson Street
Suite 1560
Orlando, FL 32801
FE: ILBMS - CITY OF DELRA1 BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Dear Mr. Veech:
We are in receipt of your fax this date, and are submitting this
cost proposal for the above referenced project.
Flight Charge ................................ $ 1,295.00
14 - 20'/" Plan & Profile Sheets . . . . . . , . . . . . $ 200.00 each
1 - 20'/" Double Plan Sheet ...........".... $ 265.00
In your projcet description request, you stated 1 Split Panel, or
2 Full Plan~ @ 1" = 20'; but on your diagrams, you indi.cate 20 t/"
Split Plans or 10'/" Full Plans. The 10'/" Full Plan will be
$300.00 per sheet.
We are looking forward to working with you on this project.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Yours truly, ~
I::f;.~~
>. BDB/sc
..
r. c:
lJt..'- .1.0 :;!.l. .1.........1. t..I'IH-V"l..HlllJlJ
.'
~
ENGINEERING SOFlWARE CONSULTING 3452 lake Lynda Drive Suite 365 Orlando, Fl32817
407/275.0506 fCl)( 407/273.1517
December 18, 1991 TP-91.139S
Revision 1
Mr. Art Austin, P,E,
Associate Principal
Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc.
200 E. Robinson St" Suite 1560
Orlando, FL 32801
Re: Delray Beach Master Pump and Submersible Station
Instrumentat{on and Control System Consulting Services
Dear Art:
Enclosed is a Scope of Work and Cost Estimate for the subject project, The Activity Detail report
shows the estimated man.hours and costs for each task, Below 15 a summary of the proposal. I
appreciate the opportunity to provide PEe with this proposal,
Phase 1 Design 186 hours $11,128
Phase 2 Construction 92 hours $6.396
SUBTOTAL 278 hours $17,524
Add Drawing:
Ladder Drawings 64 hours $3.792
TOTAL 342 hours $21,316
EMA recently completed a similar project for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, '
called the Fletcher Drive and Buena Vista Pump Station Automation project. I was the Project
Manager. Both pumps were two zone in-line booster station, capacity of 70 MOD, with several
two speed pumps. Included are some of the drawings we produced which might be of interest to
you, In addition to the design we were responsible for wnting the PLC software, testing, start-up,
and operator training.
Very truly yours,
EMA Services, Inc.
/l!J~
Mark G. Wehmeyer, P.E
Vice President
MOW /sdd
".
UIr/MGW77/1Z.18-91/S4
Minneapolis-St. Paul Philadelphia Tucson Orlando
..... .... '-' ... .' -' ... . " '-' ~ -' - '-' '-' - ,
--..
. .
-
B 10 structural R~CF.IVED
. B B technologies Inc. ;
DEC191991
'" CONSULTING P.E.c. ifiCo ORLANDO
ENGINEERS
WORK CCi:'Y Iv N
Wekiva Business Center 2..R:GINATO; II
Suite 120, 1428 East Semoran Blvd., Apopka, Florida 3270~' 2!,IE COpy & nouTE TO:
(407) 889-9660 :...
\
FAX (407) 889-9235
..~--
fax transmittal/memo ,j'l\.~; l
J ,f:';ULl.
:; '['l,)
.. , . -~.
NAME . . . '. . , : 1Ye."\ ~ u'e. ~. A-uS-rI~
GOMPANY . . , : ?e-C
FROM . , . . . . : -e. I L. &1 f...\ ~
DATE. , . , . ,: \~ -{ '1- 9 I
...
P.N. I . . . tit : 3\ -I~~
.
PAGES TQ.AN5MITTED (INCLUDINu GOVER 6HEET) 4
PLEA5E GALL IF THEI(E 15 A PROBLEM WITH TRAN6MlTTAL
GOMMENT5: , ,C\~:1. ' O~ . .Wt..~""t . ,~~. , .I.t--:l,-:-L(IJ~
, .Kk4~, , 'PJJ.l-:tP , S--c.~ '!l"q',J, , ,~1"~ "''1\)~
~,~~,~~,,.J~,, .~, ,~'"t'IMf\"% :-
. , . , . . ....5.. , . . I . . . . . . , ,
. , . ,P'E..$lc$r N ,~, ' .I~)Q,QO, , , , 7f~~. t
, , S~~, tI.~-:""", ,3,aeo,., , ~~,:tr:
~~ , ,-:-- ,3/Q,Q<;:> ,~. ,~ .m:.
.,"~".,"
~ .
. . , . -ro:1fk't-. , , , ' , . ,a4.~ . , . ' , , , . ,
, . . . . . . . . . , . ' I . . . I I . I , . . , , , .
~~kl.-, , PP.vf.bs..A~, ,~ , ,'PoL..L.,Q~ ;-,
.,
" ' . . . . , , , ' I . . . . . . , , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
, , I . . . . . . , , . . . I . . . .
t . , , . . , , I . I . . . . , , I I '
l.
, ,
, '
..
DEC-19-91 THU 13:31 STF~UCTUI-<AL_ I I::. '_l-IH1_'L-'........a ... L..-_. . - '-' .-
.
PROJECT NO. 91-168 I
I
TABLE I I
... I
.-----------------------------~_________~M_________~_.________~._________________
,
COST ESTIMATE I
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING DESIGN i
DELRAV BEACH IN~LINE MASTER PUMP STATION
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
---------------------------~----------_._------.~---------------------._---------
TASK DESCRIPTION
--~--------------------~~--------~-.._-------._~._-------------------------------
1 GENERAL NOTES AND STANDARD DETAILS
2 PUMP SLDG '- STRUCTURAL
3 PUMP SLOG . ARCHITECTURAL
4 MISCELLANEOUS. STRUCTURES
5 SPECIFICATIONS
6 ATTEND PROJECT MEETINGS
-------------------~______________~M______________._._____________.._____________
MAN-HOURS 8Y PERSONNEL CATEGORY
-------~--------~.____________w_____________~.__.____________~___________________
TASK EST. NO. SNR. PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT CLERICAL TOTAL TASK
OF DWGS. MANAGER MANAGER ENGl. HOURS COST
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 1 2 3 4 1 10 $ 500.00
2 5 10 45 105 10 110 $ 7,675.00
3 4 8 36 84 8 136 S 6,140.00
4 1 2 9 21 2 34 $ 1,535.00
S 0 8 8 2 . 7 25 $ 1,295.00
6 0 8 8 2 7 25 $ 1,295.00
--------~------~---------------_._~_._-------------._--------------...-----------
TOTALS 11 38 109 218 35 400
RATE SlUR $'75.00 $55.00 $40.00 $25.00
LABOR COST S2,850.00 $5,995.00 $8,720.00 $875.00
-----------~--------------------"---~------------------_..-~---------------------
TOTAL COST...S18,440.00
,-
'.-
'V . :; · .. . c.. : :.:;..;;:'~.i.'.{ c
,,-
'.,
, ' ,
..
J...I t:;.. '- - .l. .:.-;-1 -- ';? .l I HI..I J. -=. ;; .6 ..::.:.: ::; I kUI~ I UkHL_TI::::I"';Ht'~OLUGIES P.12t3
.
PROJECT NO. 91-168-
TABLE II
"----------------------------------~---._.~---~---~-----------------------
COST ESTIMATE
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION
DELRAY BEACH IN-LINE MASTER PUMP STATION
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
-------------------------.-~--._-_._-----------------------------------.--
TASK DESCRIPTION
------------------------------------~-~---."~----~-~-.._-~----------------
1 REVIEW OF SHOP DRAWINGS AND OTHER SUBMITTALS
________________..M~~--~----.-------------------------____________________
MAN-HOURS BY PERSONNEL CATEGORY
--------------------------------~---___~_____.ft__.~~_.__.~M~______________
TASK SNR. PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT Cl.iERICAI.l TOTAt. TASK
MANAGER MANAGER ENGR. HOURS COST
--------------------~.~-._-----~._------------~-------~._~.__..-._--_._---
1 4 20 20 30 74 $2,950.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS 4 20 20 30 74
RATE S/HR $75.00 $55.00 $40.00 $25.00
LABOR COST $300.00 $1,100.00 $800.00 $7~0.OO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL COST...$2,950.00
-
..
.;'t
...
.."
)0. ,
.'
a~~
,.
J.~:.~~ :=: I ...~ 1..1 L, I U t.,; H l- _ I l:.:.'_ I-I I'~ U l- 'J ..... .L l:.. ::=0 ..." _ ",",4
.u I::. '-" - .L .~ - .~ .L IHU
~ .
PROJECT NO. 91-168
"
TABLE HI
.~________________________.M______.__________________.______._.____________
COST ESTIMATE
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION
DELRAY BEACH IN-LINE MASTER PUMP STATION
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
_____________________~M_______________~.______________-------------~-------
TASK DESCRIPTION
-----------------------------------...-------....------..-------~-~--------
1 ISSUE CLARIFICATIONS
2 SITE VISITS
_________________.~_~--------------_w-.-------_N~------__.________...______
MAN-HOURS BY PERSONNEL CATEGORY
-_._-----------------~------------------------------_.---------------------
TASK SNR. PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT CLERICAL TOTAL TASK
MANAGER MANAGER ENGR. HOURS COST
_______________~___________.M~____________________.A._--------~-.----------
1 J 8 8 8 27 $ 1,185.00
2 20 0 0 8 28 $ 1,700.00
-._------------------~-----------~-~----------._---------------------------
TOTALS 23 a 8 16 55
RATE SlUR $75.00 $55.00 $40.00 $25.00
.
LABOR COST $1, '725.00, $440.00 $320.00 $400.00
_____________.~._____________M._________._.___________-~-~-------------~~--
TOTAL COST...S 2,885.00
.
..
Ii,
g~~
l..Jt:..l. .1.0 :11 1'-1' '-1.1. t..I'IH-\,.It'(LHIUJV f-'.-=i
SCOPE OF SERVICES
DELRAY BEACH MASTER PUMP AND SUBMERSIBLE STATION
INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN
...
PHASE 1 DESIGN
Drawings
1.1 ' Process and Instrumentation Diagrams. Prepare 1 P&ID in accordance with ISA
Standard SS.l as amended by, EMA. Meet With PEe and Owner to establish location and
type of primary sensors, control devices, local control panels, and interface to the existing
SCADA system. '
1.2 Conduit Layout. Prepare 1 conduit layout drawing depicting the instrument and control
system wiring tequirements. This sheet will be marked-up, by hand, on the draft electrical
conduit layout drawing, provided by others. Drafting will be by others.
1.3 Instnunent Mounting Detalls. Prepare 1 instrument mounting detail sheet.
1.4 SCADA Interface. Prepare 1 schematic wiring diagram that depicts the interface to the
existing SCADA system. This sheet will depict the SCADA system interface to the master
pump station and the submersible pump station. This is the only sheet to be provided for
the submersible pump station.
1.5 Control Strategy Diagram. Prepare 1 sheet using control strategy function blocks that
depicts the strategy to be implemented in the pump controller. Review the pump control
strategy with PEC and the Owner,
Specifications
1.6 Pump Control Device Specifications. Prepare construction specifications for the
microprocessor~based pump controller. Follow the Construction Specifications Institute
Manual of Practice, 1985 Edition, Use Division 17 for the digital control equiJ?ment.
Incorporate prequalified hardware/software into the control system specificatIOn. .
Incorporate the requirement to use prequalified system integrators into the specifications.
1.7 Instr"ment Specifications, Prepare specifications for field mounted instruments. Include
instrument specifications in Division 13.
1.8 Input/Output PoInt List. Prepare input/output point list from P&IDs.
1.9 Instrument and Control System Installadon Contractor PrequalUlcatlon. Prepare
prequalification criteria and proposal document. Evaluate I&C installation contractor's
proposals and qualifications. Recommend a list of qualified contractors. The goal of the
prequalification shall be to identify competent contractors capable of supply and
mstallation of the I&C system.
,.
lJ!r/~(JW77/12.18.91/S4
..
!-''---- ......- - ~ ~ -~ "- ,-', .<.-' ,t !.... .~ r". ~
.
1.10 Control System Hardware/Software Prequallncatlon. Prepare prequalification criteria
and a proposal document for control system hardware and software. Solicit proposals from
vendors, Evaluate vendor's proposals and recommend hardware/software configurations
that contractors will be allowed to bid.
...
1.11 Quallty Control and Assurance. Provide review of plans and specifications by senior level
staff to assure conformance to project requirements, bidability, and buildability.
PHASE2CONSTRUCTIONSER~CES
2.1 Sbop Drawing Review. Review instrumentation and control system related shop drawings
for conformance to the specifications. This includes review of the I/O point list and the
control strategy descriptIons. It does not include review of the software code or the
software documentation.
2.2 Field Testing. Witness field testing of the control system and instrumentation calibration
methods to' a limit of 40 hours.
2.3 Prepare Record Drawings. Within 120 days after completion, furnish one set of
reproducible record drawings. These will be drawings from the contract document
package, revised by the contractor during construction, to show significant changes made
during construction.
ALTERNATIVE ADDITIONAL DRAWINGS
3,1 Ladder Diagrams. Prepare 3 ladder drawings, Drawings will be typified to as great an
extent as possible. The drawing sheet count is based on the following assumption:
Motor/pump control device interface 2 sheets
Field instrumentation/pump control device interface 1 sheet
fi.
LB1' /MOwn /12.18-91/54
- ... .-
,.
,
t +
.fIIt
.
I
i ...
pc ~
t
~
~
>-
..
It..
...
8
-
I ""
I I ... ~~ ~ ss ~s g~ ~ ~iS ~~ ~
. : ~ 1ft - 1ft ... ~. N ... ... ... .-
. . .
- ... ...
I I
I I
I
, i' Q) &t
IJ 00 0 00 eo 00 0 o 0 00 0
~ . .o~ . , . - - - - - , , . , ,
0 " . eaojll ealO 210 ... "'., '0. .
H ! ... ... ...
..::l ~ t1
... t4 '" .
E tQ Cf ~
" - ; ~ . ;
i i N! !t at
i ~ lw
c:a VI ! il il N- -'
G) i NS Hg i ; S
I Iii i~ ii
~ , !W ...
>c a I ; i ; i &
.
... ~ : I ~~ :I ~~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~
... ii ...
~ f""4 I . .r: K s:
" !
~ ~ s:I
-r4 ..
g b\ ...
'n en
~ .! t
0 IQ ,., ... In .... ", IQ IQ M
!l ... ... .. .- - ...
~ 4
1! SI ~ 9! ~ SI Sf S:! S! ~
I , . I . . I .
... ... 1ft - :; .. ... - -
III 0 0 .. 0 c::lI 0 0 0
.:. , . I I , I I I
.., .., ... 1ft 1ft 1ft In In
9! ! 9! S! St 9! S! N S!
~ 0-
I. I . I . , I , .
ftI t!I e '0 II'l 1ft 0 ~ '^
... - .. ... ... -
en I . .:. I I I I , ,
,., lit ,., ~ .., ... .., ..,
, .
,
... , .'
I
I
eft .
,
,
co I
I !l ...
r4 , I u
I I . ~
i . ~
I .....
I I
. i ... >>t
Q . . oc 0
.... ... ~
~ . Q ... i ~
I III
+ a ti ~ ~ Q &;
I
. - ;Ii B ~ '" ...
, ... P1 ..I
. it ... c; I
I .. - !;
I - I - B !
, ! tI ... .... I ...
. R ... 2
I B :l:l S I .'-
I B t; U. It..
I - .... I e.
, ~ ! . ~
I It.. ... ... ...
I
I D
I
, Do
. -.-
'. , ,.',,-.
':' ..~.. .. '.~:~'
l
. .. -'
.
"
.... ~ ' . ,
+ +
I
ICIt
I
, ..
I
1M
I~
lea. i
I
I
I
I ..
I ~
I b'
I A-
j
I&.
i~ i~ 0 l;l i ~ ~ ~~ ~ -0
, ... l;il ;::j
~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. ..
... .. "" "" I'll N
I
I .
,
I
~ ~ VI
! . 00 00 0 0 0 CD 0 Cl
. . ~.; . I . , , ,
II ~... !i !i "" ~~ ~
..., va .-1 ...
= I:) ~
M .. ~ IU IU
a ~ '" ., iC ii
foG ~ .
t! ... ... ...
! i I >- ....5 i ; i ~ i
1ft i i i .... ..I VI
i i i ~ ~ ~ ...
at l1li i III ... ... ...
I ~ * III .I: ft
a I ...
= . i I . .
, = i fa ; Ii! - -
I : I ! ~ ~ = ~ .. ..
~ )C ~ ~
e ... ... ...
..... I a ... c C E I&. ... ... ...
II ~
~ III a
g .... III
~ ..
.,.f III
... ~i
0 :::l ~ .- ~ IQ - - ~ ... ...
~ - ~
1'1
!s [g
Q .
"8 Sf S! a! S! S! Sf Sf S! Sf S!
I I I I I ~ I I I I
It\ 11\ 0 It\ ~ ... " 0 ~
IU .- ... ... 0 ....
, I I 0- I I I I I I
11\ 11\ -<k "" N ~ ... .;; I'll
.- .- ...
.. S! S! S! ~ ~ ~ ~ St S! S!
I.. I I . I eO I I
.. ... - .- ~ a lQ - c; N
~ 0 0 ClI 0 - ClI
I I ~ to I I . I I I
- .., .., ... .- ... fI\ -<k '"
.- ...
I
I
I
... ,
,
CJ\ ,
I
I
co I
I ..I
P1 I ~
I
U I fa
,
, III
! , A- t! ia
i ...
i w u ;
~ i ...
+ ~ g ~ III
111 I
tf l!I
UII a I I
3 . t; en
~ ... I ~' ....
ft ~ ...
- w CI ~
~ a ...
~ Q Ii m ....
9 m Q fil ~
~ ! a w Q
I'll ti ~ ~ ~
... ... ... !
"" III ~ .... III I&. ... ~
! ...
if a
...
. ~. ., :~"- :- '. ":;/';,"f',/~
~,
, " I
. " :
"
. "
.
..
l.Jt.1,.. J.Ci:H J.<-i; <-i<-i t.I'IH-UhLHI HJU f-". ,-
t . I I
""
+ +
C"I
!
~ i
...
l1
~
t ~.
...
.!
~
:... ~~~!g ~
. ~ ....... .. ..
. U ~N ~
. - N
.
.
.
I I i II ~~~~ ~
~ = I:) 'i
~ ~ 1 i
Eo4 ilj ~
! I ~ ~ f~
. ~ g 8
~ I .c:u
~ ~: ~~
~ ~ Q :; .I~c~ ~~
~ ~ ~.. ~K~.. ~~
H 114 ~
t JQ .~ ~
fil >4 ~ III
! .~
N ~ ~i -
Q ~ ! li3
Q .
- ~~~~~ ~
! a~:;~:; ~
I I I I I .
NN~In" N
- ... ..
t ~~~~~ ~
~ a:a:~:;; SI
11'1 ~~~..... ~
I j~ ~~i~-
....
10\
1
I~ ~ CCi5~
lu ~ IJ~~ft
!! i ~
+- +. w
: >- .
: 1.1 =-;;
: !till li
~ l M ~~;II ~
! ~! ii!tlQIl( 15.
1 I l~lIil~ i
. 11& :4.1111......
'.
. .
t i
1'4 I
I
I
I ..
!
Pi
i I
7: , . . . , . , , . , , , . . , , . . , . , . . ,
I
,
t .., II
t ~ fI , . , . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
! ~ I . , . . . . . . . , , , , , , , , , . . . . . .
~ I
-;-i , . , . . , . , . . , . , , , . , , , , . . . ,
I
,
l i I . . , . . . , . . . . , . . . . . . , , . . . .
. ! L I
B : i . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... ~i
a : ~ t , , , . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , , . . . . .
!I : fa ~
m + .. , , , . , . . , , , , . . . . . , . . , . , , .
.
Dt ,
m ~ i I , , , . . , . . . , . . . . , . . . I , . , . ,
I I
I I
I I
I I
. . . . . , , . , . , , . , . , . . . , . . , .
I i I I n
~ ~ I , . . . . , . . . . . . , , , . . . . . , , , .
fa i ~ I "
t I
. . . . . . , . . . . . , , . . . I . . . , . ,
= ~ J I I
I
I
I
! - ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . .
M
!l I ::I II
... ~ + . , , . . . , . , . . . . . . , , . . . . , . ,
~ ~ I . I . . , . . . . . . . , . . , , . . . , . , .
, ,
I ,
. . . . . . , 1 . 1 , , , , . . . . . . . . . ,
I , I I , I I
I II I I I I , , ,
, ). II I I I ,,," t
II I " I I .
j ,...,,' ...".." .....,..,
.. I I
~ C. :: 1 1
· i '
* . .. . . , . . , , . . . . . . t . . J . . . .
:-I--I-III--ii-ii--------I-
,~, K KKE K
... : ~ L I I · · I I I I I I I " · · I" · M
4r\ :~" i~ K ~ ii: ~=
+-~----- -----~~~----------
co : f~ ~~~~~~ ~~.~~o ~,~o ~o
I .
... +- -------------------~-~~-
U 1 i II ! ~ I ~ I
!
! ~ II ill; '" ea
+ .I- :~ ~ = ~ m~ 1= Si ~
i~h ~~Iei R~h I illI~1 II
'S ,- j~~~ -i~ I ti B~eiB -6
i'~l~ ~~!S~ 8618 61 ~
.*1 u~- i - 2 iQ I
1~~iiiS~~~II~gs6 ~iie~I~MI~
I~ ~ ~
. '. .. ,
"
t, '" ,(
, "
..
.
, ,
t +
IN '"
r
r
I
1m
'~
s: II
";' III
~ ~ I
: 5 ,
I ~ i I
' I .
I
. ...
.;. i-
.
~ ,
I ...
~; I
i
J fA 1 _ II'l 11"1 ...
I
i . I ...
~ : I jq"'" ...
'"
1:11 I .
i I
.
B I W
+ 8 .. '"
i !! ... ...
= ~ ;e ~
,,;,J
..:I ; ~ I
!
: s
, ... 0....0'" so
~ II ...
~ :I n
; ~ I ~DI~~I ~
...
i#i1S OJ
: l i
* - ----- -
I
I U
, ... .I"I~
t"'f : II 'I
I .. I !ill: ...
0\ I II
+ - t -..-..._- -
co . ~ I it~itit
+ :. * ~ ... .. ..
t"'f -----.... -
! : ~ ~ ...
, ....
: ~ ~ ..
.I- + :t; ft
I ~ II ~ .....
~
.
=-.. i
! a il ! Niii! II
J
I 8 ~ lilll I
I ~ ~ i H ...
:~ :a =~iil .
..
: ~ u .. ~ ~ ... - ~
s: ...
u' -J\:-
, , ;" "
, .
" .,'.,\
, . ' " ' ,
.'
... V Iv '" Iv '\) ~ c...,
:$,ltfJ.~ ~ 0 0 0 '0 0 0 J
. '. I ~ 0 0 ~ 0 \) ()
0 (\ t c;) <l 0 t \) f'v\
~ 1 ~ ~ ~ () 0 ()
1 .. c;- o
- u r( , \.
- A N\ l~ I\l 0 \\i\ 0' ~ <)
~:::i:~:r:i:~ ~ N' "}- '- ,,\ 0 "- t-.\ ~
~i;'ifk N " l\l 0
1~ll~i * ~ I
( '= f. 0 0 0 \) () Q 0 0 () J '"
,~ 0 () () 0 () 0 0 0 ~ 0
\I. '1 i Q ~ 0 0
I ~ 00 "- ~ ~ ~ () Q
e ~u () ~ ~ ,
~ 0 l\) '\\- ~ ~ 0' 0
0.:., ~ 0 "- 0
~ ~ r\l l'\l "- r~ l\J DO
\) (':S
~ ~l p..
'2' t:
~ ~
J to-
~ llO
: J S
'"{
"- So
, , M Cl-o] ~
~
0 ~ I~
'. \ ~ ' f. ~~ ..
~ ~ ' '!
! ~' II ~
::.....
~
::.~' .: \!.
. .~ 0 ~ J ~
': Z C '"
...
:. _..~: . S S
' . '2' ....
~. ..
. , Cl-o - 0
,'. s 1
:;';i: 0 '2' ~
) ~
Q., Q., ~
fa': 11
':~t oor
;;)U .
~'
:0i
,:~~
^ ' , \
, ' "1 '" VI '1.. 'l \l \l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
;:) ~ ~ \t\ ~
' ,$: ~ \::: .J ~ ~ ~ ~
",<i:; ~ ~ 1
".. ~ :~~: ~ ~ () ~
t.S e Q
, 1 N ...... ... ~
":> ~ "- ~! '- 0 0 'f.. M "- "- "-
...
t'- ~ .....
~ .~ ~ ........ 't-
,ji ~ i a' s .9
~ . OIl) ~ ~
~ ~ ::; . .
'P,j; Q c::l '\
fI) It !II ~ ~ ~ <
I ~ ~ ~ 1 1 '(
8 ~ 1- N '\ ~
, ~ ~ { 0
"i(~ ~ -a \ ~ ~ ~ ~ " "- () ~ i
m s ~ 1 ~ ~ q M ~ .....
; OWl' ( ~ ~
\Fif. '"' ~ ... \., "\ ..... ~ 1
I ~ l ~ '0 " ~ '::! ... ~ "' .,!) ~
~ i ~ ~ ... ~ "- ~ ')( ~ '-! ~
() ~ ~. <) 0 \l \l\ "'"
~ Q. '0 ~ () ~ 'l ~ " .,.... ~ ~ ":. Q
."" ~ 't 1 ~ ... . . ~ ~
.... ~ ~ () "- '\I '-,
-z.::::::?:;:; ~ .~ ~ ~ \. ."
',iit>:>:: r! '-J \J '-1 <:\.. \\ ~ " 11- ~ ~
;:~;~:;i:;}::; Q CI) ( \\ -\, , t- ~ ~ .,
~:(.:::::::::~:::: CI) , <. '- ~ .Q , v .1-- ~ ~
;~(;;:::,::,:; tl ~ .: '" ~ ~ <l ~ () \\\ ~ ~
3 ... .
~ . C/) t '- ~ ;;. ~ ~ i ~ ~ . ....,
o · ~ J ~t. 0 ~ \'- )( ~ ';)
';;'~:::';::'.:( a:'S 0 >. 0 '- I";' ~
>. - ~ ..... ~ ~ N ~ 'v 'Cl ~ I..,
>;::::::::~':' i .~ "' "' \.,
.:>:::-;.;.:.:.:.
~':~};::%: U ~ l::: 1
"ff~t;r. ~ i CZ D
~ '= ~ I"- ~ ()
UJ ........ ,..J M <;}. '-..9 ~
'-
,.
" \J ti \) Ii..""
~ .
, . 0 ~ 0 c;) '0 ~ ~ \)
Q ~ l;) Q () c;)
00 ~ Q () V ()
I 1 .. 0 "- \'- r" 0- 0- \; ~ "1
y ~\. ,
I 0 \j () c, [\j N
, tt N "- "- ...... t\) .....
i 0
, , 0 0 0 8 0 " ~ a Nl
Q 0 ~
" ~ 0 0 0 C) () ~ Q
.11 .. \:. ~ ~ ~ 0- 0- ~ \}
~y ~
~ N ~ (\) N N l\)
......... u
~
, . ~
I ~ ~ ~
1 . ~'. 1 ...
I . ..~
" S
. .
..
..
~
! ' ~J
.. . .
I'
,.
'.
J In
, , - S
. ,
. .
.: ~ j
"
) :S
'Ii .
;:)y
~ '" ^- A. " C- ~ V\ v, ~
j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '-\
0 "" 0 ()
';.::1 0
, :!;! .... ~ tv\ \' rv\ '- '- ...... "-
. . ~
......... '-.9 ~
-
)
~ .
\l ~ ""
" \:.
~ .
~ ~ '\ ~ (1 ~
, t '4S /' ~ 0
~ t ',) ,
~ 'i "\ \t \l " ~
~ ~ ~ v; "
- ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ... 't r- \( ... ;'" ~
.. , l). r ~ '-
~ () ~ -t " ~ ~
1 ~ ...... "- ~ N I~ ). "-
... ~ ... .. ~ 0 "
~ ~ ~ '0 ... ~ ~
...... .... " " ~ ~
0 .. l(. .... ll. ~ l:)
ra. () ~ ~
l~ \\. ... ~ II ~ "0 ") ~ ).... (
.. () e.
oS { 'l oQ '"
t- t.l () "'0 ... 0 .,J
I { \\.. 60 ~ 'i"
~ l'- () t" J ~ ~
- ~ I~ i'-' ~ 'v ~ ~ ~
~ '0 ..; ~
~ I'\) \:)
.
~ ~ '4' \J '\\ l\j \'-\ ~ ""
....... ,
......... -- "- ....... .........
....... ....... ..... ......... ........
, \i
- 0 0 '?1
~ ~. (]
0 0 0 Q
1 ,0 v u " t'1
! ... e
CJ ~ "- ~
j 0
'\) I\) "- .....
0
j () \) J
0... 0 () 0 M
'11 \ 0 <) 0
. 0 0 '-
~CJ l'- 0- l1- e. ~ ~
N Q 0
~ .......... ~
1\\ ~ "- <'S
~ ~
N "
~ "-
L,' ""'-
1 "-
.... \<) ~
CJ ~
S "
M' '-
~ M
:J~ .
..
... ... tit
3 '"
.' s
I
!~ .,.
~i ~ v. ""
'"' '-1 ~
;:;l '-\
.J ~
..
J ~
0
.~-i ... ~ "- ....... ........
;. :!~
-. It +
~ ,- J ~ ~
\{ .....
,~ - 1
... ~ ~ ~ ,:;
1"- ... ..... \) J I
~ >J <\ ~
\!) t " ~ ~
<1 .., ~
j ~ 0 ~ "t 0 .J
';3 0 ... ~ ! ~
't) J
~ t " :I .J
~ ~ ~ v
'to V '-- J ...
~ ~ ~ ... ~
T' ~ 0 ) ") 1 1
... v -a
1 '- t" ~ ~ .. J
r.. '0 t- ~ ~ "'- l. ~ A.
\. "
.. \) \. ~ P\; >J III ~
3- ~ \ll ~ 0 .... ~
J .,} ~ '-l ~ ...
0 \l\ ~ \l\ ~ ~ ~ e
... I) ~
0 ~ ~ a
...
~ {'- u.., ~ ~
...... ......
,
o.
..1...J' ~...'-' ... -' -' ... . .. .-
. .~..
( mD structural Rr::CriIVED
a B technologies Inc. DEe 1 9 1991
'" P.E.c.. Ei'~c. ORlANDO
CONSULTING ENGINEERS .WORK CC :'Y I Y N
Wekivo 8usiness Center O~IG'NATOII t
Suite 120, 1428 East Semoran Blvd., Apopko, Florido 3270~ 2!'2~ COpy t. nOUTe TO:
(407) 889-9660 (
FAX (407) 889-9235 ,
fax transmittal/memo ~ HI.f: r
~ (~~IIU.
:: Tl)
NAME., . . -, I . : ~"\4 u'a ~H A-US~'.J
(,QMPANY . . , : ?e-c..
Fe,OM . , . . . I : ~ 1 1- a-'Ifo~ ~.
DATE. , , . , ,: \~ -( '1- Cf I
...
P,N. , I . . . 1_: .B\-\~~
PAGE5 TRANSMITTED (INCLUDINu GOVER 6HEET) 4
PLEA5E GALL IF THEI(E 15 A PROBLEM WITH T12.AN5MITT AL
.
GOMMENT5: , C,\,:\,'"t, , O:~ , ,t;ti:1..~. .~~, , .I,t-.) -:-\...ll-Jt:,
, ,H~~, , 'P~,t':'tP , $,",,~ ':Cl'~~. ,~,.~'--"t~~
~,~~.~~.~~. ' ,~, . ~~f,t-'(~-re ~-
. ' . , ' " , jl , , , . , . , . ' ,
, ,
, , . :D'E..$l$r N ,~ , , ,la,p,qO. , , , T~\..&,:t
, , ~~9. tJ~ -:-, , , ,3, aE)O, , , , ~-Ml1X, JZ:
, , , , , , ~-:GtJP, , "~. ,31.CQ~,~,,~.:m:.
~ .
, ,-r o~^.'t-. . , , " ,.a4~ oc:o , . . '.' , , ,
, , , , , . . , , , , , . , . . . I , . , . , , , ,
~~k(,. . Pnv~S.A1.., ,~ ' ,~~ ~-,
""'l
. . ' , , . . . . . ' . , . I , , . . , . . . . , , . . .
, . . , , . , I ' . . , , . , . . , .
. I . . I , ' I . , , , . . . I , . '
'-
, ~:"';'
DEC~1-:;'-91 THU 1:5:3J. ~=: I l--::: .J_' 1_ , '_I '-.0;:: ......... L _ . L- '__ . . I I ,_, L- '_' _ ~ " .
PROJECT NO. 91-168
TABLE I ...
.-------------------~---------~-------__~M___________w_________~_________________
COST ESTIMATE
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING DESIGN
DELRAY BEACH IN-LINE MASTER PUMP STATION
DELRAY 8EACH, FLORIDA
------~--------------------~----------w--------_~_____________________.._________
TASK DESCRIPTION
-----------------------~---------~-----------..~______---_~w___________~_________
1 GENERAL NOTES AND STANDARD DETAILS
2 PUMP SLOG - STRUCTURAL
J PUMP BLOG . ARCHITECTURAL
4 MISCELLANEOUS. STRUCTURES
S SPECIFICATIONS
6 ATTEND PROJECT MEETINGS
--------------------.~------------~"-----------__~_N_______________._____________
MAN-HOURS 8Y PERSONNEL CATEGORY
----------------~.____________w________________._______________~_________________
TASK EST. NO. SNR. PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT CLERICAL TOTAL TASK
OF DWGS. MANAGER MANAGER ENG1. HOURS COST
-------------______________w_____________________________________________________
1 1 2 3 4 1 10 S 500.00
2 5 10 45 105 10 170 $ 7,675.00
3 4 8 36 84 8 136 S 6,140.00
4 1 2 9 21 2 34 S 1.535.00
5 0 8 8 2 7 25 $ 1,295.00
6 0 8 8 2 7 25 $ 1,295.00
---------~---------------------_.~w__________________.________________~__________
TOTALS 11 38 109 218 35 400
RATE S/HR $75.00 $55.00 $40.00 $25.00
LABOR COST $2,$50.00 $5,995.00 $8,720.00 $875.00
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL COST...$18,440.00
, -
'F'
,.
..' " "',
o ,'.
, ,
, '
'. .... .' .. ,
., ,
, >'." , ,
," '.
,t, -
..' . , '
, . "', 't',
',~ .' I
,. HL
~ .' - ~ . ., -_0 ..... .--' - .-' -:.... -_' , . -."_, ,_ . ,_" '-'. .......... L- _ . t..:.. t_ i-i 4-" LJ L- LI I~ J.. t::.. :=_ t-' _ L.:J.:::-
PROJECT NO. 91-168'"
TABLE I I
~_________________________________~__~_.__~..M~_~_~_______________________
COST ESTIMATE
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION
DELRAY BEACH IN-LINE MASTER PUMP STATION
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
---------------------------~-----_._._-------------------------------~..--
TASk DESCRIPTION
__________________________________________._____~~-~w-._~________________~
1 REVIEW OF SHOP DRAWINGS AND OTHER SUBMITTALS
________________._M~~~---~----------------_-----------._._________________
MAN-HOURS BY PERSONNEL CATEGORY
----------------------------------------~----._---"------~-~._----~-------
TASK SNR. PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT CLERICAL TOTAL TASK
MANAGER MANAGER ENGR. HOURS COST
____________________~.___._____M.______.______.______~~.__.___._._._______
1 4 20 20 30 74 $2,950.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS 4 20 20 30 74
RATE S/HR $75.00 $55.00 $40.00 $25.00
LABOR COST $300.00 $1,100.00 $800.00 $7~O.OO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL COST...$2,9S0.00
-
..
, ~
. '
J..
~
_.~._ ,N'~, .. .._'.
...:._ , ,~. l_l 1__ t 1__ ........ H L- _ . L- '_ .-. .... 'J L I_a 1....;:1 .J. t::.. :=- t-'_~..:.l4
.J.J"'-"-' ... J J' ... . .,--- .... __0. ._.~
I .
.
PROJECT NO. 91-168
..
TABLE III
.__________________________M_____.________.__________.------~--------------
COST ESTIMATE
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION
DELRAY BEACH IN-LINE MASTER PUMP STATION
DELRAY .BEACH, FLORIDA
-----_._-------------~~------------------------.-._------------------------
TASK DESCRIPTION
_____~__________.__________M~______.w________~._______----------~----------
1 ISSUE CLARIFICATIONS
2 SITE VISITS
______.__________.~_.---_--_------_-w*----_-----~---_---"---------...------
MAN-HOURS BY PERSONNEL CATEGORY
_____________________~___________________._~________w_________.~________~__
TASK SNR. PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT CLERICAL TOTAL TASK
MANAGER MANAGER ENGR. HOURS COST
----------------._---------._._--------------------~------------*----------
1 3 8 8 8 27 $ 1,185.00
2 20 0 0 8 28 $ 1,700.00
_____________________~______________________._._________~w__________N______
TOTALS 23 8 8 16 55
RATE $/HR $75.00 $55.00 $40.00 $2 5 . 00
LABOR COST $1,725.00, $440.00 $320.00 $400.00
~____________4~.____________.M._________...*__________---.-------------~.--
TOTAL COST...S 2,885.00
fl.
g'B'~
-. III..
..
J ~fi'\ ? ' ~32 ,:, : C1 C1 FROM HAZEN SAWYER-BOCA PAGE. C1I:31
.
-
HAzEN AND SAlYER BOCA RATON OFFICE
~ -- .-.-..--......... r. f~
En,,{""''''tItltol ~OiflUl'tl ... Sci<<lttrta
Facsimile Transmittal Shee~
omCE II (407) 997~8070
FAX It (407) 99'7-8159
/-]-'2 4;S~ ~
DATE: TIME: p.m.
PLEASE FO~! ARD:
TO: t;, ED/Z&c- Ait:1t.1--T o.D",eI~
Company Name: C-i'!1 . f b.tr~ Bc..k.
FAX Number: ~- 243-->-<3774 ~tJ 6 0
FROM: 5AAJt.tk;~ ;
----.
REMARKS: ~""'MoCM.J.... h,~ s ~r Ml-S
""---
---.----....---.-,.-....--------........-.-.-.....
--'-
NUMBER OF PAGES BEING 'l'RANSllITTED ~ _ (InClUding This Header Page)
PRIORITY STATUS: (Ch~ck One) -i- URGENT RUSH __ ROUTINE
NOTE: If you <:10 Dot receive all of the pages as indicated above, please call the above listed
number.
:;
1
~
et:
Q;l
TO BE FILED? _Yes _No It YES, FILE H
-
..
..
J8tl "? ' ~~2 5:00 FROM H8ZE0 S8WtER-BOCR F'RGE.OO2
HAzEN AND SAVWER Hazel'l and Sawyer, R C.
2101 Corpor.rte Blvd,
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Environmental Engineers & Scientists 407997-8070
Fax 407 997.8159
January 7, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: George Abou-Jaoude
FROM: ' Saade M. Chlbanl
~UBJeCT: Proposed Changes to the Master Lift Station
The City of Delray Beach Wastewater Transmission System is experiencing Inherent problems
typical with transmission systems In South Florida. Two of which are deterioration of the pumping
stations due to 20 or mor~ years of sulfide attack and widespread repumpin9 of the sewage flow.
The Master Uft Station (MLS) Is an example of both of these problems. The MLS pumps flow
from the entire Eastern portion of the City Including a bulk flow from the Town of Highland Beach.
The station was built In 1963 and stili operates under its original wet pit/dry pit design. Since the
wet well and Influent str\lcture are open. deterioration of the concrete structure has reaohed an
advanced stage.
The MLS pumps the Delray Beach ftow north to the South Central Reg\Qnal Wastewater
Treatment Plant SCRWWTP. The SCRwwrP Is located north of Lake Ida Road between
Oongl'&$$ and 1-95.
The open wet well Of the MLS and the long resident time of wastewater In the system (repumping,
etc.) have caused serious odor problems, resulting of many complalnts from the neighboring
clttzens. In addition flow from the northeastern portion of the City is pumped south to the MLS
and than pumped back north to SCRWWfP. This repumplng Is inefficient and is a waste of
energy.
A new In-One booster type pumping station for the southeastern portion of the City is proposed
as a solution to abate odors and to reduce energy cost at the MLS. The odors will be eliminated
by the nature of the station (totally enclosed), wastewater Is never exposed (to atmosphere), and
energy savings Is derived from the more effiolent pumps used typically in booster stations' and
the eUmination of doUble pumping.
The new in-fine booster station could be built at the northeastern comer of the Intersection of the
FEe Railway and N.E. 3rd Avenue. The existing 24-inch Influent force main from the MLS
Vetemns Park sfte would then become the suction header with Ifft stations #1, 5. 7. 8, 17 and 18
and a new station #100A tying In. New station 100A is needed to pump the gravity collection
service area flow of the existing MLS Into the header system.
Page 1 of 2
4058MOO1.80A
Now Y\XX NY . Annonl<. NY . u~~ :><Udle RIver. NJ . R:lI!:l\lll, NC . Chartone, ~C . RlttlmOnd, VA . f'Qlljvlood, fl . Boca Hal0n fL . Fwl P"'~" Fl . !u\JIM, F~ . Mianll, fl . 9<lIl<t.a. O,E, ColomDll
o.
"
JRt1 (' '92 ':' : 01 F ROI'l HRZE t1 ~;Rld'(E R - B(',: H PRCiE . 00:3
George Abou.JaoUde
January 7, 1992
In addition to the new MLS, flow from the northeastern portion of the City will be pumped to Uft
Station #11 which will become the northeastern regional station from which flow will be pumped
directly to the SO-Inch Influent force main (booster station discharge), To accomplish this Uft
Stations #4 and #13 should combine In the existing 12-inch foroemaln #11 (flow reversed) and
pump to the influent of Uft Station #11 (see schematic).
Tables 1 and 2 show present and proposed regional transmission system modifications based
, on the early results of the hydraullo model presently beingdevelop9d by Hazen and Sawyer. As
shown on these tables in addition to building a new MLS, rehablng Station 11 and adding Station
100A win be l'9qutred under the proposed in-line booster program. All other ohanges to the
various pump stations are necessary due to ohanglng flows regardless of options selected.
The proposed In-Itne booster station and rerouting of flows is projected to save the City
approximately $100,000 to $2001000 per year depending on flows and pumps selected. These
savings will offset some of the capital cost associated with rehablng and replaolng existing pumps.
Detailed cost ~stJmates and percent worth analysls will be presented In the final documents to
be $ubmitted to the City.
Page2of2 HaUiVS aNV~ZVH
4058MOO1.BCA
'.
,.
'J~N 7 '92 5:02 FROM H~~EN S~WYER-BOCA PAGE.004
.
~
~ ~
W W~
m ~ tecc
~ ~ ~~ ~
2 ~ ~* ~9
c ~ ~~~~~ 05
w z 2~~02 a~
M mmgffi~~~~~ ~~
I ~i~~ww~~w ~~
~ 8 g~~~5~~~~ ~~
I ~ 2282~~~8~ ~~
~ N ~
~ ~~ ~&L ~~~~a~~~~ 5~
ffi ~~ ~~ ~rr~rrr~r ~%
:E )002 ~ ~O
w 0e W~
0> ~w,.. mal
C w
~ z =.. ~~~~~mo~~ >~
~ iw ~- ~Q~-O~~~~ s<
"II! 'II!! l:t.. . . . . . . . . a:-
..: ..: C\lN....~_~;-"'-...J~
.~ ~ ww
~ ,.. 00 &L. CCa:
i= ~ ~frl!; ~~<
g ! ~~ ~t ~~q~~~~~~ ~~~
t ~~ w ~~~~-~~~- OO~
:J O~ If cr~~
a: -0 z f2~w
~ ~~ ~~~ 1~~~~~~~8 9~~~
< i~ ~oa ~~~--,~- ~ ~~
:!! w en LL 0
OCO
m~ WN ~W0
f~ ~g~ ~~~~~.~~~ ~@g
~ ~~~ --~ r~ ~ aa~
~ ~ a:~~~
2 w~ ~~~~
:J a::~s :n~1 ~ II. (,)
~ ~Q~ MN ~~~~~~ r~ ~
~~a __ ~ N~ ~~ ~
99 ~
~ ~~ ~
~!I ~=~~~~~~~ ~~ ~
~~~ _r~ ~ _ ~~ n
~ ~~ ~
;t OOs...."."'"C'O,..
~ IftCIIJ,.."" ....,..
I' .1'"
'JAN 7 '92 5:02 FROM HRZEN SRWYER-BOCR PRGE.005
8 LS.~
110" roM.
I
I srT~
I IF f14 IU 00lJ
I 3D'Df'LlDT
f F1JICE HMN
Jy m. F.H. 24' f.M.-
:~r....
LS13 ~SU I ~~~"rW~AND
o -- I
L________ -a \U ~: LS 18 111
~ PRmJSED I
- I SllCT1IJt
I tOlD I
~ ; I -aLl':;\ f~UL-T--~'-I~---J
-= i ~I I:
~ b 61 I I
I LS IllOA I I ~ I
I 1.1
~ I -,
~ ~I: ~! I 1
~ I IflRCElWM II I
t _____-J I
:I( !! - - - - - --r PIUDSED AI 17+18 I
0. DTENS!lJfm
I !.. II UIIIIIl - 6 LS 17
~ I
S r--L-Q LS 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -DLS7
r...J-
o LS 1
- - - - - .... - - .xJ6IM FOIlCa IIAIM
- - ... -- - .. - PIIOfIOIeI) FORCe IIAI't
o LS 1 IWI~ LFT aTATIOIf8 CITY OF DElRA Y BEACH
OLl l00A PIIOPOII!D ISf 8TATIOH WASTEWATER SYSTEM
MASTER PLAN
HAzEN AND SAWYER MASTER LIFT STATION
EnvlronMntal En9lft"r'S .. ~nttri. PROPOSED UPGRADE
" hi'
- - - - "-,'-" I I', V I I 1'1 n '- t:. ,".t .;:. H VJ I C. ~ -,C. ,_} ~_, H r'H'.1t. . 1"1:::10
. \,
2
u:
~ ~~
i ~ ~z
0.. ~b
u. WW:)
m o a:..oi
i ~ ~m ~
~ tI.~
a. w zWo B~
I ~fffflrf
ca
~ O~
z ~ffl~l!!~~~12~~ ~~
III ~.... Co a. a. a..
:I ~~wwwlrw!:( lD~
~ I ~~~(ijS5S!$!5~ 1< a:
w<
~~~~fbfhfu8a.~ t::~
w Za.a:a:a: ~z
:e 2_
:JZ
w ~ ~Z
~ m~ w
a::..... ~~~~~~&1<<i~~ O~
~g: ~Q..
uJ ....c\JIN--....Q1'r""N O~
:& 0~ D!
w ZQ L5L5
~ Ow ......
~~ w mas
a:u. ~~a~~~Spq~~ >>-
a.. ~~~
!i! I~ Sa. NN(\It\i............l;')opoC\l
Z Zs
8 (If IL ~~~
~ ~w Ii
g II) ..Ja: ~~w
i! ~~ mlt ~~~~~~~~3~ >E;>
t:: S
~ a: 0(,)
Q. a::: a: 0
::i n of(z
a:: ~~il! u.. w
w fa~~~~8~~~~ ~~~
~
~ w ~ CJ ~ ...................... N..... erg;:)
~~
o~8
0'< WIN WUJ(()
It; a:i:S ~~m~~~~~~i ....,..w
i2oA. 000
C) ~~CJ UJW::>
z gada:
it w,.. ~ If ~~
:s
::> ~~:& Re2~$~....~~~~ A n (.)
a. ~oa. C\J~co....:tco .- ....'" If
.;.JCJ ...... N ~~ "
1I.u.
~ ~~ ~
u.\.L. ~
W~! g~~~ ....~(;;~~ ww LIi
a:a: 0..
ra~" ~::;; ~~r.;;Nt:: ::>::1 11
III. ~5 u..
u.u. a.
~ &li!;:ro....t,....1
....
"1 T(.'TAI F'Ar;F ,r'lllR +~"
,.
F F ClI" F' c: '-' FE::.::. I Ci H H L E \1'3 III E E F 111 G .= Ci W::, U L T ~1\1 T S 01.l17.1'?'?2 1 (~ : ~~ i:. F' "j
..
I
I PEe
PROFESSION INEERING CONSUL rANTS, INC.
VJ A FAX
t>1}-03/1.0
1-1.0
Mr, William H. Greenwood, P,B.
Director of Environmental Service
City of Delray Beach
434 South Swinton A venue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
1n- Lil .
Dear Mr. Grccnwood:
As you requested, we have revised our preliminary cost estilnatc (attached) for the in-line
booster master pump station project. Please note that the cost estimates for both the in-
line booster master station and the small submersible station have bc.cn significantly
reduced based on our conversation. Special fCt"ttures which have been delete,d from the
in-line booster master station include sound block or double eMU walls for the pump
room, hospital grade acoLIstical panels for the generator room and a general reduction in
building size using a separate low ceiling building for the. MCC and Gene-rator. The
estimate for the small submersible, station has been re-.duccd base.d on a precast or cast.in~
place concrete option for the contractor. Also, the odor control building and relocation
of the existing odor control equipment have been completely deleted.
As a clarification, the cost estimate for the demolition of the existing master pump station
. includes removal of the structure to three feet below grade.
I
Should YOll have any questions regarding this estimate) please do not hesitate to contact
us.
!
I
, Sincerely)
i
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I a~~#<'afX'~-'f-
I
.
I
I Arthur R. Austin, P.E.
I Manager, Envjronmcntal Department
ARA/ak-WlO
Attachment
cc: Mr. David T. Harden, City Manager, City of Delray Beach (via fax)
I Mr. George Abou Jaoudel City of Delray Beach
I
('flg1n('llrs I
pl,l''''(!($
~Wllt:iurs ?OO Fel') HCltw'!:,1)" Sfrt:(!! ' Su.lf' 1:,(/) . UI:~WI('I(l. I IOlirLt12B(ll . '1()71t;;;' f!Of;? ' f/,>,;; 40{':f.ltl99~Ol
,
FP~M PPOFESSIONRL ENGINEERING CONSULTRNTS 01. '='7.1'3','2 \ 0: ();' F'. ::;
-I ~ ~ ~ e \ t-l
\J " Cj .~ ~ ~
\I
~ 0 0 0 0
; ~ \) '0 8
~ 0 () 0 ~ ~ 0 {.J \} 0 ,
J ~ , \, ~ (,) 0 ~ ~ t tv)
~ - ., ,~ C) ()
" r( W\ r" L.;' o' \
- ~ \Ii ~
" } N 0
H " ~ ..... t..l Cl
0(- r\) ..... '\.\ N 'a
1: I
r ,~ \l ~ ~ 0 -.
."i '\ (l 0 0 () 0 () 0
~ 0 0 l} ",
~;;:~, ~ ~~ 8' (J () G () () (J Q \~ -0
M ~ ~\O l\ ~ () () (j 0
[i ' . t.
. ~';.' \~ ~ \:; \r; t;; 0
; '~~ ~ '...., I'>'. ...... ~ ~'" l
I~ ~ )l q .....- ('~ r~ "\.1
u
IE ~;j l t,~
. ,~r.' . ..;~ t: -....-.... --
.;; '.~J
~ .' ~
i
J ~
I. ~ 1
.: ~ ~
',. ~
"- ~ ---
"
" M f~
~
0 \l
; , ~ 'I ~~
..
~ t(1
Q
>..
~
\t
:! ~ J ~ It!
): ' } ~
. ~~ 1 "S
. ~: frl ~~ I
I ' )
, ,;. ~ i-t )
~ ~~I 3!
~. ~
. ' 1
','
,. ij
. l
. '.~ '\ ~
... ~ --. ~ ~
.~. . ,
;., .!: ~ ! I"'l VI 'l ~ Q. \t ~ ~ V\ l"\ ~ ~
....... N t '\ ~ ~ '\) '>!o ~ \tl '\ ~ lj ~
~ ~ \~ ~.\-
~ ,~. ~ - \. ~
~
I\l ~ ~~ 0 e 0 () ~ >-
W ..... '- ~ G () M
"" ....... 'f.. ....... ...... " ~~
f'.. ~ ......
'I H ~ I.~ V
....... \!,\\l
~ ~ ~ ~ kl
'cl ' ~\l..
'I ~ ~ ;;. ~~
,. . ).. II
~ ~ 't N
~ { '\ ~ ~~
I I 1 \., ,. ""
i ~ ~ E '0 \: ~ 'i OJ
, ,. ~ 1 h ,~ t~
. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ \.'.
: . :~, .~ 1 Ii ~ ~ ~ '0 "" ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ 't ~ t S
{ ~ () ~ ~ '-" "? 1
'~l~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'l r .~ .... \) )
J ~ ~ "0 . ~ "
hi ~ ~ "" ~ \.. \l '-l ~ '-'~
'"" \l ~ t ~. 1 J
'~'.::'~:: ".l ~ \,) ~ \.\ \'. ~ \J .,
'. ~~~~~~;.; , ~ ( \\ J:l ~ I \,.. .... \4 ~ ~ .... 11
..':'i~ ! ... ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ':) Cl
, ~~
~f: J 't { \; ~ ~ { ~"
~ >:. ; ,.,) ....
",dl () , N ~ ~.
;;li~ \~ o ""
...... '-Sl ~ l;:l ~ ~
,.,.:!,.~ '..) *
,~i~~~.:
fd ~ ~ ~ . ~
s};~t:
~i'?if
a:: ~ ... ~ ........ '" M ~ ~ ~ f'.. ~ ~ ()
'-
~ . .I
,
F.F:'.,'i'1 F'1;:CiFE::.~, I Ot1HL EIHJ I HEEl;: I 1l'3 COHSU.L THtJT::. 01. ij? 1 '?'?2 \ 0: ':':' F', 4
\I... \t. \l. -.:.,
" " '-' \J
" \J \.I V f. ~ it. -J.
o ~ 0 () 0 () 0 0
() l'- ~ P 0 Q 0 () i
J 1.. 0 ~ \'. '" 0 () 00 fv\
Q " '- " r" <) I..... ~ \. . I
VI 0 -j. (\ ~ '^ C) 0
J ~" I\.l ....... ~ .... N N ~
· 000 G Q 0 Q ~' -
. . 0 0 C) ~ ci ~ ~ ~ IJ
! ~ Ie ~ ~ ~ l,1 ()' ~ & a-
N N ~ N ~, '" \\) ,~
!
~ ~
~
~ - -
~J ~
.....
! ~
~
) I
J~ ~
-
! t'\ >... >-... ^- >-. VI \..1 v, V1 ~
t ~ 'I '-, ~ '\l ~ ~ '\l ~ ~
IiJ ~
I 0 ') lit
~ 0 ~ 0 0 Q ~
~; d ~... ~ t'" {'- "" " ........ ...... " ~ \~
;t ......... '.... -..!) ~. \' ~
~ \,;
~
~ - - ~~
~ ~ . ~
~ l1 "" t-~
~ \i t( , 4~
i,...' ~ ~ 'a~ ~\l
I ~~~ ~ ~ ~ \f ~~
. '\ ~ 'i . '\ ..... l,..; \'- ~ ~ ~
~~b:~~~rbr~~~ ~ ~~ ,~
j' ~ \~ ..... ",- ,,:: ~ N { ~ ). ~ '( ~ X ~ I.:i
N~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ) ~~ ~~
i '{ ~ ~ ~... ~ ,II. ~ lI. ~ ,M. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .;
I ~ '.J ~ ~ ~ t ~~ 'l ~ '0 <l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ ~J~~ --:"t~ ~~
~ V..... \.,.J ~ -0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II
~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ . ~
....... ....... ....... ..... ............ .~
I
.
FROM PROFESSIONRL ENGINEERIIIG CONSULTRNTS 01. L:li. 1'~'~;: 10: (1'~ F. 5
.
- ~
~
0 0 0 'J
() 0 M
j J ~ 0 0
0' ~\.
II..l ~ ~
I - -
0 0 \)
0 (J () IV'
~! .. (J
0 ,
0" ~ ()
"0 "'- \.. if
tl
l ~
J ... l\'l \'l
" ~
S ~ ~
~
~ h '{
~ <:)
~
!~ \,
.. N ()
~
- ~ M ...
....---
! VI
s
I
~~ ..
~
~ V\ ~ ,. ~
1"1
--\ I ~
I i ~ ~~
~ ....
III Q
~I , \ ~ )...
~~ M ........ I.lI "- ~t
~ ,~ . ..
lI\ ... 1>-
.... ~ !
I~ ~'-\
J j '"'
\:. .... ,...... ~~
\'- ') ). E j
... ~~
1\ " 1 '-oJ ~ () j ! 1-\<
.J -.l \l,\ I, ~ ~\t
I \, \1J ~ ...1 V
I .1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~
I ~ Ie ..
I l } \ ~ J j
~ \ ~ I~ ~~
( \.. ~ ~
I \l j ~ \1 ~ J ~
- \S. 0 ~ ~~
~ . ~ 4) Q ~ .J, ~ f
\J , (I t ~ .t ~)
.! ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ... ~~
(l '-
J , ~ ~ \:, ~ ~\;
,
( ~ ~ ~ ~ ........
I \. ~~
I \!) I~
I
; f'..
I ~ I"- ~ I .t}
"- ........ "-
..--1-.
T -
"
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER t~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 8 - MEETING OF JANUARY 7, 1992
COMMISSION MEETING DATES FOR FIRST QUARTER OF 1992
DATE: January 2, 1992
Below is a list of Commission meeting dates for the first quarter of
1992. This item is being brought before you to ensure that there
will be no conflicts with campaign schedules, conferences, etc.
-Tuesday, January 14, 1992/ Regular Commission Meeting
-Tuesday, January 28, 1992/ Regular Commission Meeting
-Tuesday, February 4, 1992/ Workshop Meeting
-Tuesday, February II, 1992/ Regular Commission Meeting
-Tuesday, February 25, 1992/ Regular Commission Meeting
-Tuesday, March 3, 1992/ Workshop Meeting
-Wednesday, March II, 1992/ Regular Meeting
-Tuesday, MarCh~992/ Regular Meeting
-Thursday, Marc 2~, 1992/ Organizational Meeting
(*Note: The Mayor and I ~ll be attending a seminar January 28,
29, and 30, 1992) .
~/6
'-