04-14-92 Regular
.
~
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA - CITY COMMISSION
REGUL~~ MEETING - APRIL 14 . 1992 - 6:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 P.M.
COMMISSION CHAMBERS
-
RULES FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
-
1. PUBLIC COMMENT: The public is encouraged to offer comments.
However, as a general rule, the order of presentation shall be as
follows: City Staff, comments by the public, Commission discussion
and official action. City Commission meetings are business meetings
and as such, the Commission retains the right to limit discussion on
any issue. In most cases remarks by an individual will be limited
to three minutes or less (10 minutes for group presentations) .
The Mayor or presiding officer may adjust the amount of time
allocated at his/her discretion.
A. Public Hearings: Any citizen is entitled to speak on items
under this section.
B. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items f rom the Public:
Any citizen is entitled to be heard concerning any matter
within the scope of jurisdiction of the Commission under this
section. The Commission may withhold comment or direct the
City Manager to take action on requests or comments.
C. Regular Agenda and First Reading Items: When extraordinary
circumstances or reasons exist and at the discretion of the
Commission, citizens may speak on any official agenda item
under these sections.
2. SIGN IN SHEET: Prior to the start of the Commission Meeting,
those individuals wishing to address public hearing and/or
non-agendaed items should complete the sign-in sheet located on the
right side of the dais. If for some reason you are not able to
complete the sign-in sheet prior to the start of the meeting, you
will not be precluded from addressing the Commission on an
appropriate item. The primary purpose of the sign-in sheet is to
assist staff with record keeping. Therefore, when you come up to
the podium to make your comments, kindly complete the sign-in sheet
if you have not already done so.
3. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION: At the appropriate time, please
step up to the podium and state, for the record, your name and
address. All comments will be addressed to the Commission as a
body and not to individuals. Any person making impertinent or
slanderous remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the
Commission shall be barred from speaking further to the Commission
by the presiding officer, unless permission to continue or again
.
..
City Commission
Regular Meeting
4/14/92
address the Commission is granted by majority vote of the
Commission members present.
-
APPELLATE PROCEDURES
Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made
by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this
meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these
proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that
a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes
the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The
City does not provide or prepare such record.
-
AGENDA
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation.
".
3 . Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4 . Agenda approval.
Action: Motion to approve.
5. Approval of Regular Meeting minutes of March 24, 1992,
Organizational Meeting Minutes of March 26, 1992, and Special Meeting
Minutes of April 1, 1992.
6. Proclamations:
A. National Library Week - April 5 through 11, 1992 and
Bookfest Weekend - April 24 through 26, 1992.
B. Days of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust - April
30 through May 3, 1992.
C. Holocaust Memorial Day - April 26, 1992.
D. National Community Development Week - April 20 through 26,
1992.
E. Earth Day - April 22, 1992.
F. Arbor Day - April 24, 1992.
G. Recognizing Paul Constant for his academic achievements and
positive contributions to the City of Delray Beach.
7. Presentations:
A. Lennart Lindahl - Presentation of First Reimbursement Check
from the Florida Inland Navigation District for the Veteran's
Park Seawall project.
B. Introduction of Community Police Officers.
8. Consent Agenda: City Manager recommends approval.
-2-
.
~
City Commission
Regular Meeting
4/14/92
A. AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT GRANT APPLICATION: Authorize
staff to submit a grant application in an amount not to exceed
$100,000 to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) under the Hope 3 Grant program.
B. GRANTING OF EASEMENT DEED: Grant an easement deed to
Florida Power and Light to provide electrical service to the
North Water Storage Tank.
C. RATIFICATION OF EMERGENCY REPAIR: Ratify the emergency
repair of a sewer line on S.E. 2nd Street between Swinton Avenue
and the FEC Railroad and approve payment in the amount of
$28,000 to Johnson Davis, Inc. with funding from Water and
Sewer Repair and Replacement Sewer System/Mains and Lines
(Account No. 442-5178-536-60.66).
D. RESOLUTION NO. 43-92: A resolution amending Resolution
No. 32-85 to clarify the Community Redevelopment Agency
boundaries.
E. RESOLUTION NO. 36-92: A resolution supporting the concept
of AMTRAK service from Jacksonville to Miami along the Florida
East Coast Railway,~_corridor. "4
F. RESOLUTION NOS. 37-92 THROUGH 42-92: Resolutions
authorizing the execution of supplemental agreements with the
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) consenting to the
assignment of Pipeline Agreements with the Seaboard Coastline
Railroad Company (CSXT) to FDOT.
G. RESOLUTION NO. 34-92: A resolution assessing the costs
for action necessary to remove 15 junked/abandoned vehicles on
properties located within the City.
H. RESOLUTION NO. 35-92: A resolution assessing the costs
for action necessary to remove nuisances on 38 properties
located within the City.
1. AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS:
1. 1992 Street Resurfacing Program - Hardrives Asphalt
Co. , in the amount of $188,184 with funding from General
Construction Fund - Resurfacing (334-3162-541-60.53).
2 . Gymnasium Floor Replacement - Community Center - Camaio
Surfaces, Inc. (via Palm Beach County School Board
contract) - in the amount of $41,230 with funding from
Decade of Excellence Bond Issue (Account No.
225-4125-572-61.57).
3 . Site Plan Preparation - Leon Weekes Preserve - Florida
Atlantic University in the amount of $15,000 with funding
from Recreation Impact Fee Fund (Account No.
117-4169-572-33.19).
-3-
.
*
City Commission
Regular Meeting
4/14/92
4. Housing Rehabilitation - as indicated below - with
funding from Community Development Block Grant - Housing
Rehabilitation (Account No. 118-1963- 554-60.23) :
-913 S.W. 4th Avenue - Henry Haywood - $14,341.95
-304 S.W. 11th Avenue - Henry Haywood - $14,290.50
-605 S.E. 2nd Avenue - MJD Construction Services-
$14,282.10.
5. One ( 1 ) 3-Stage Air-Scrubbers - Environmental Services
- Davis Process in the amount of $39,500, plus $6,000 for
maintenance with funding from 1984 Water and Sewer Bond - 3
Stage Poly Air Scrubber (441-5162-536-61.16) .
6. Alley Reconstruction Project - Environmental Services -
Jack Hardy, Inc. in the amount of $483,771 with funding
from Decade of Excellence Bond Issue Alley Reconstruction
(Account No. 225-3162-541-61.43/$366,557.50), Water and
Sewer - Renewal and Replacement/Water Meter Replacement
Program (Account No. 442-5178-536-61.81/$93,454) and
Community Redevelopment Agency Reimbursement ($23,000).
7. Irrigation - .. Gulfstream Boulevard Beautification~ -
Windmill Sprinkler Company in the amount of $13,472.50 with
funding from 1987 utility Tax - Gulfstream Boulevard
(Account No. 333-4141-572-61.38).
9. Regular Agenda:
A. REVIEW OF APPEALABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS OF VARIOUS
BOARDS: Consider accepting actions and decisions made by the
Planning and Zoning Board, Site Plan Review and Appearance Board
and the Historic Preservation Board during the period March 23,
1992 through April 10, 1992.
B. APPEAL OF A HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD DECISION:
Consider an appeal of a Historic Preservation Board decision to
deny a Certificate of Appropriateness for a six foot chain link
fence at 310 N. Swinton Avenue.
C. APPEAL OF A HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD DECISION:
Consider an appeal of a Historic Preservation Board decision to
approve the site plan for the Patio Shoppes.
D. APPROVAL OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT: Consider
approval of the Collective Bargaining Agreement with the
Fraternal Order of Police.
E. REOUEST FOR TEMPORARY USE APPROVAL: Consider a request
from the Hardaway Company for a temporary use permit to erect a
construction compound/construction trailers on a vacant lot
located at 231 N. Congress Avenue in conjunction with the 1-95
Widening Project. City Manager recommends approval.
-4-
"
-
City Commission
Regular Meeting
4/14/92
..'
F. SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 4/ECKLER ENGINEERING: Approve
Service Authorization No. 4 in the amount of $28,800 for
engineering services for rehabilitation of pump stations 19A,
20A, 23 and 32 with funding from Water and Sewer Repair and
Replacement - Engineering Services (442-5178-536-61.83) . City
Manager recommends approval.
G. GULF STREAM BOULEVARD BEAUTIFICATION: Disqualify the low
bidder, waive the City's claim for the 5% bid security for
Triple A, and award the bid to Florida Blacktop, Inc. in the
amount of $15,490 for the installation of landscaping materials
in the medians on Gulfstream Boulevard between Seacrest
Boulevard and Dixie Highway with funding from 1987 Utility Tax
- Gulfstream Boulevard (Account No. 333-4141-572-61.38). City
Manager recommends approval.
H. MODIFICATION TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT/TRAFFIC SIGNALS:
Consider a proposal from Palm Beach County to modify the
interlocal agreement with the City to provide that the City will
pay for the installation of new traffic signals.
r. APPOINTMENTS TO THE NEIGHBORHOODS TASK TEAM: Appoint
three .. members -to . the-Neighborhoods Task Team .
J. APPOINTMENT TO THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RELATIONS COMMITTEE:
Appoint a member to fill the expired term of Martin Frost.
K. APPOINTMENT OF A MEMBER TO SERVE AS CHAIRMAN OF THE PUBLIC
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS COMMITTEE: Appoint a member to serve as
the Chairman for the Public Employee Relations Committee.
10. Public Hearings:
A. ORDINANCE NO. 12-92: An Ordinance correcting the zoning
from RM (Residential Medium Density) zone district to CF
(Community Facilities) zone district for the parking area
associated with the Acura Automobile Dealership located on North
Federal Highway. Special Adjustment Advisory Board recommends
approval.
B. ORDINANCE NO. 13-92: An Ordinance rezoning the American
Legion facility property located at N.W. 8th Avenue and Martin
Luther King Jr. Boulevard (N.W. 2nd Street) from R-1-A (Single
Family Residential) zone district to CF (Community Facilities)
zone district. Planning and Zoning Board recommends approval.
C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 92-1 : Authorize staff to
forward Plan Amendment 92-1 to the State Department of Community
Affairs.
11. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items from the
Public-Immediately following Public Hearings.
-5-
,.
-
City Commission
Regular Meeting
4/14/92
A. City Manager's response to prior public comments and
inquiries.
B. From the Public.
12. First Readings:
A. ORDINANCE NO. 15-92: An ordinance regulating the
placement of newsracks and other moveable fixtures within the
City's rights-of-way. If passed public hearing April 28, 1992.
13. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items:
A. Commission
B. City Attorney
C. City Manager
-6-
I'"
.
.
CITY DF DELRAY BEA[H
.. -~-
PROCL.~l! -t rIO\
WHEREAS, libraries help us to achieve our dreams of a
better life and a better world by providing valuable resources
supported by professional expertise; and,
WHEREAS, libraries provide for educational, business,
cultural and recreational needs of citizens of all ages, origins,
and views; and,
WHEREAS, the quality of library service in the
community is enhanced by citizen participation on the Library
Advisory Board and in the Friends of the Library; and,
WHEREAS, libraries in Palm Beach County join in the
celebration of libraries, literacy and reading by presenting
Bookfest of the Palm Beaches: A Literary Festival, April 24-26,
1992,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City
of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim April 5-11, 1992 as
"NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK"
and April 24-26, 1992 as
"BOOKFEST WEEKEND"
in Palm Beach County,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
caused the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to
be affixed this 14th day of April, 1992.
MAY 0 R
THOMAS E. LYNCH
SEAL
, ~
.
[ITY DF DELRAY BEA[H
.. .....-:::. .-:: - - - _ ~ ~.:. .~";..l"';'
PROCL-UI.--t rlO\
WHEREAS, from 1933 to 1945, six million Jews were
murdered in the Nazi Holocaust as part of a systematic program of
genocide, and tens of thousands of Gypsies as well as millions of
other people perished as victims of Nazism; and,
WHEREAS, the people of the City of Delray Beach should
remember the atrocities committed by the Nazis; and,
WHEREAS, the people of the City of Delray Beach should
continually rededicate themselves to the principle of equal
justice for all people; and,
WHEREAS, the people of the City of Delray Beach should
remain eternally vigilant against all tyranny, and recognize
that hatred and bigotry provide a breeding ground for tyranny to
flourish; and,
WHEREAS, April 30, 1992, has been designated, pursuant
to an Act of Congress, as a Day of Remembrance of Victims of the
Nazi Holocaust, known internationally as Yom Hashoah; and,
WHEREAS, it is appropriate for the people of the City
of Delray Beach to join with The United States Holocaust Memorial
Council in the commemoration,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City
of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim the week of Sunday,
April 30 through Sunday, May 3, 1992, as
"DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE OF THE VICTIMS OF THE HOLOCAUST"
in the City of Delray Beach in memory of the victims of the
Holocaust, and in the hope that we will strive always to overcome
prejudice and inhumanity through vigilance, education, and
resistance.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
caused the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to
be affixed this 14th day of April, 1992.
MAY 0 R
THOMAS E. LYNCH
SEAL
.
~B
'.
.
.
CITY DF DELAAY BEA[H
.. - ~ ... .... . = . _::: _u -- - -- - - - -. ---
PROCLAJIA rlo.\
WHEREAS, B'nai B'rith International will coordinate the
participation of American Jewish communities in the International
Holocaust Memorial Program ... "Unto Every Person There Is A Name";
and,
r-'lH3REAS, the program, which was initiated by the Yad
Vas hem Holocaust Memorial Center in Jerusalem, consists of reading
the names of Holocaust victims at public ceremonies in Israel and
the Diaspora on Yom HaShoa, Holocaust Memorial Day; and,
WHEREAS, the B'nai B'rith councils, lodges and units
throughout the United States will pause to remember each Jewish
life that was lost; and,
WHEREAS, the B'nai B'rith service will start on Sunday,
April 26, 1992, at 8:30 a.m. , at Anshei Emuna Congregation, 16189
Carter Road, Delray Beach, Florida,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim April 26, 1992, as,
"HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL DAY"
in the City of Delray Beach and urge all residents to remember each
life that was lost as they will not be forgotten.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
caused the official seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to
be affixed this 14th day of April, 1992.
MAYOR
THOMAS E. LYNCH
SEAL
.
~ I
'.
.
CITY- DF DELRRY BEREM
.
PROCL-4.11.-4 TIn \
WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOtK GRANT PROGRAM
has operated since 1974 to provide local governments with t~e
resources required to meet the needs of persons of low and
moderate income; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach became an entitlement
City, receiving its own block grant funds since October 1, 1985,
providing the much needed assistance in revitalizing our neig~-
borhoods and assisting the low and moderate income cit~zens 0:
our City; and,
WHEREAS, community development block grant funds are
used by thousands of neighborhood-based nonprofit organizations
throughout the Nation to address pressing neighborhood and human
service needs; and,
WHEREAS, the last several years the Federal Government
has reduced Federal assistance to local governments and nonprof~t
organizations; and,
WHEREAS, during this time of constricted Federal
contributions to the task of meeting the needs of low and moder-
ate income persons, the problems have grown as evidenced by the
dwindling supply of affordable hous i.ng , the massive rise in
homelessness, and the resurfacing of hunger and malnutrition;
and,
WHEREAS, the Congress of the Nation has often over-
looked the critical value of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM and the significant number of organizations and
projects that rely on its funds for support; and,
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has declared
April 20-26, 1992, NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK and have
called upon the President and all people of the United States to
observe the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City
of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim the week of Apnl
20-26, 1992, as
"NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK"
and call upon all citizens of our City to participate in ceremo-
nies and activities celebrating the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
caused the Official Seal of the City of De1ray Beach, Florida, to
be affixed this 14th day of April, 1992.
MAYOR
THOMAS E. LYNCH
SEAL
f
~D
'.
[flY- DF DELRAY BEACH
.. -- --
PROCL-UI.-t no\
WHEREAS, some twenty years ago, more than twenty million
Americans joined together on Earth Day in a demonstration of concern for
the environment creating an informed public whose collective action
resulted in the passage of sweeping new laws to protect our air, water
and land; and,
WHEREAS, in the years since the first Earth Day, despl.te
environmental improvements, the environmental health of the planet 1S
increasingly endangered, threatened by Global Climate Change, Ozone
Depletion, Tropical Deforestation, Ocean Pollution, Toxic Wastes,
Desertification, and Nuclear Waste requiring action by all sectors of
society; and,
WHEREAS, Earth Day 1992 is a national and international call
to action for all citizens to join in a global effort to save the
planet; and,
WHEREAS, Earth Day 1992 activities and events will educate all.
citizens on the importance of acting in an environmentally sensitive
fashion by recycling, conserving energy and water, using efficient
transportation, and adopting a more ecologically sound lifestyle; and,
WHEREAS, Earth Day 1992 activities and events will educate all
citizens on the importance of buying and using only those products least
harmful to the environment; and,
WHEREAS, Earth Day 1992 activities and events will educate all
citizens on the importance of doing business only with those companies
that are environmentally sensitive and responsible; and,
WHEREAS, Earth Day 1992 activities and events will educate all
citizens on the importance of voting for those candidates who demon-
strate an abiding concern for the environment; and,
WHEREAS, Earth Day 1992 activities and events will educate all
citizens on the importance of supporting the passage of legislation that
will help protect the environment,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim Wednesday, April 22, 1992, as
"EARTH DAY"
and declare the City's support thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the
Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed thl.s
14th day of April, 1992.
MAY 0 R
THOMAS E. LYNCH
SEAL
f
LE.
"..,
.
rlTY DF DElRAY BEA[H
.. .--
PROCLA.HA JIO.\
I
I
WHEREAS, recognition should be given to the value of
trees in our community and the need for a continual city-wide
forestry program for the benefit of all persons; and,
WHEREAS, the holiday to recognize the importance -
trees in our lives has been celebrated in the United States 5 i r.c ~
April 22, 1987,. and is now celebrated in all fifty states and
several countries throughout the world; and,
WHEREAS, the National Arbor Day Foundation in coopera- I
tion with the U.S. Forest Service and the National Association of
State Foresters is sponsoring a community improvement proJect
known as "Tree City USA" in an effort to make every community in
America a better place in which to live; and,
WHEREAS, Delray Beach has been recognized as a Tree I
City USA by the National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to
continue its tree-planting ways; and,
WHEREAS, the protection and proliferation of trees
within the City of Delray Beach is governed by regulations for
the purpose of promoting the health, safety, welfare, and aes-
thetic quality of the community by realizing the importance of
trees for oxygen production, carbon dioxide absorption, dust and
air pollution filtration, wind and noise reduction, soil erosion
prevention, surface drainage improvement, energy conservation.
beautification and aesthetic enhancement of all lands in t!1e
City; and,
WHEREAS, the optimum time of year for planting most
species of trees in Southeastern Florida is during the month of
April due to mild temperatures and the beginning of the wet
. season,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City
of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim the last Friday in
April as
"ARBOR DAY"
in Delray Beach, to be celebrated this year on Friday, April 24,
1992, and urge all citizens, schools, and organizations in the
community to join with me in realizing the value and need for
trees and to plant a ceremonial tree on this date.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
caused the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to
be affixed this 14th day of April, 1992.
MAYOR
THOMAS E. LYNCH
SEAL
.
Lf-
;.:,
.
CIT-Y DF DlLRAY BEA[H
...
PROCLAJ/A TIO\
WHEREAS, Paul Constant is a talented Delray Beach
resident who is a freshman at Atlantic Community High School in
Delray Beach; and,
WHEREAS, Paul Constant participated in the annual
Science and Engineering Fair, which was held on February 12, 1992,
with an environmental project titled Nutrients Effect on Codium
Algae Year Two; and,
WHEREAS, his project took 1st place in the environmental
category for the second year in a row, and he also received two
special awards for outstanding achievement; and,
WHEREAS, Paul Constant will be participating at the
State level at the 37th Annual Science and Engineering Fair to be
held at the University of Florida in Gainesville on April 22, 1992,
and,
WHEREAS, IBM Corporation has also asked him to display
his project at an Environmental Expo to be held in Boca Raton on
April 22, 1992, and, with the help of the Coral Reef Society of
West Palm Beach, he will be able to accomplish this; and,
WHEREAS, Paul Constant wishes to continue his research
project and study the codium algae blooms which are destroying the
ecological balance of our ocean reefs and which take hundreds of
years to recreate; and,
WHEREAS, Paul Constant has made a strong personal
commitment to continue his research off the South Florida Coast and
will be successful with community support and help,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, on behalf of the City Commission, do hereby
congratulate Paul Ryan Constant on his academic achievements and
recognize the positive contribution he is making in our community.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
caused the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to
be affixed this 14th day of April, 1992.
MAYOR
THOMAS E. LYNCH
SEAL
· b~
'.
"
~/;Y/i/02-/1lU
~
A, :.'~~ "'~""~
,'; 1i\~1 /~,-~~.
Delray Beach Police Department ~: ,'4?C'.~:': ~~
~\lL':l":;/:
~
- ........ ~,~-
-_...1Il...._-
300 We~t Atlantic Avenue · Delray Beach, Florida 33444-3666 ejO' .' ~.
RICHARD G. OVERMAN
(407) 243-7888 Fax (407) 243-7816 Chief of Police
SOrJ
Pt ~,
MEMORANDUM
--
t:r^-
~ David T. Harden, City Manager
-19
F~: Richard G. Overman, Chief of Police
DATE: April 3, 1992
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY POLICE OFFICERS
With your approval, I have made arrangements with the Agenda
Coordinator, Cheryl Leverett, to have the Community Police
Officers introduced to the City Commission on Tuesday, April 14,
1992 at 6:00 p.m. This introduction will only taKe approximately
ten (10) minutes.
RGO/ppt
cc: C. Leverett, Agenda Coordinator
M. Wright, Police Information Officer
-() . ~ '--- a.-<A ~. ;r.'4"14f 'to .....; w _ '-< C- n
kAA (p./ ~ " {Y-f. F
~-o~'-: d-;" t C-l - ~C/"f- ~ -, .p tJ ''-''-'7lV .. -.
Df\d--
b7H
""'/'''.ITTr" Tn Tl.JC l"nO('"\'fr~~r"IT r,r "'Lle r.~'I" 'TV fir. I Ice
I.'.
.
..
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
~
FROM: CITY MANAGERj/f/j
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # g-A - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT GRANT APPLICATION/HOPE 3
DATE: April 10, 1992
This item is before you to authorize staff to submit a grant
application in an amount not to exceed $100,000 to the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the HOPE 3
program. This funding is to be used to develop and implement
homeownership programs for low income households.
Should we receive funding, it will be used to assess the availability
of properties which meet the program criteriaj provide staff training
and technical assistance in developing and implementing the
homeownership programj development of curricula for homebuyer
counseling and training; and to develop an application for an
implementation grant.
Additionally, authorization is also needed to enter into an
agreement with the Palm Beach County Housing Partnership. Recently
adopted regulations require that most programs funded through the
Cranston-Gonzolas Act be public-private initiatives and involve the
participation of non-profit agencies.
Recommend approval of the request for authorization to submit a
grant application to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development for funding under the HOPE 3 program and for
authorization to enter into an agreement with the Palm Beach County
Housing Partnership.
...
".
.
M E M 0 RAN DUM
..
To: David Harden, City Manager ~
community Improvement Director f)
From: Lula Butler,
Date: April 6, 1992
Subject: HOPE3 Grant Application Authorization
April 14, 1992 Commission Agenda
ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION
This is to request Commission approval to submit an application
for a Planning Grant to the U. S. Department of Housing & Urban
Development (HUD) in an amount not to exceed $100,000. This is
also a request for authorizat~on to enter into an agreement with
the Palm Beach County Housing Partnership in order to develop and
implement a new homeownership program.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
By authority of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990,
(also known as the cranston-Gonzolas Act) , HUD announced the
availability of funding to be used to develop and implement
homeownership programs for low income households. This program
is entitled HOPE3 and is consistent with the intent of the new
federal regulations which is to provide 'IHomeownership
Opportunities for People Everywhere (H.O.P.E.).
HOPE3 funds may be used to acquire government-owned (HUD, RTC,
VA, etc. ) housing units and rehabilitate the units for resale to
low income families. If authorized by the Commission to apply
for these funds, we will be requesting a planning grant which
will provide funding for the fOllowing activities:
1. Assess the availability of properties which meet the
program criteria.
2. Provide staff training and technical assistance for
developing and implementing homeownership programs.
3 . Develop curricula for homebuyer counseling and
training.
4. Develop an application for an Implementation Grant.
The new regulations require that most programs funded through the
cranston-Gonzolas Act be public-private initiatives and involve
the participation of non-profit agencies. It is for that reason
we seek authority to enter into an agreement with the Housing
Partnership to plan and implement the HOPE3 program.
,.,.,
"
- " ,. '". .n'~",:Cc.'.t'r~'~"'T',.;OPcC.for OM8Approva!ri02506-0119(E;.;p.C4/3G,:J2)
\ .~ "- ..' 1 '. ~ ....: .,,.It ~ .~ J II 1l,J- fo'-#;l1 .:A .,.. ,,~ ~ '.... J. - .
....."'." ".. "",,,,J,, '.," _.~ ~;._....Ic;''''::''''mC!y :"':cmp.s Program (WOP~ 3)
"'''''''=.'_:-:-:':,.:..~,_"._;~2~.!~.... ~'~ ~4:]~h.:;' ~-l '.iI ~] ii ..'. III ~
-
<i'~~::; ,~(;r~;-;;-~:;c;rd-;n to; this Wli9G'ion of informatior, is e~timated to average 20 hours per response, inclJding the time lor revi.:lwing instructi0r1s, seilrcr,i',g
s";':'''' -:i,:,~ ~o~'.cas, 2aJ1U;!{i'] .3nd mai;lta:ning the data needed, a:Jd completing and ~eviawing the collection of :nformatiol1. Sene comments rega,dino !iiis
t; '~.2,! as:i;;,:::':J :. ~iriY 0:1"'3; dSPf!C: of ~is co;!e,;:tion of Inlonl1a~vn. inc:uding suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Reports ~\anagement Of~cer, Or:;;;.;>
c:, ":. ,.,. ,:,,:c;; ,=-.,.' ','.> a:,: :::'j:;t",o1o'<;, U.S. Depa:1ment of HOlIS;clg and Urban Developr'1en:. Washington. D.C. 2041()-3600 and to l'le Office Of M",nag()rn~nt and
:, '-. _' ~O;',:iC.'i\ ':;=c'~.:t:.:n "'r':>;2ct ~2::;OS-O 119). Vhshingtcr., DC. ~'05C3. Do not sand this comcleted form to either of these addresses.
".,","_=' _"_.tI__'-.......~...,..L...,...~O:'''-''..._~,___.__~ ~.............. __-
:_ ';.}~; ~.: :;1:~J..;~..::::;;: 'D':::; apol;C3t;on s:/c-;,,;!d be ~sed for 4, Scope of ApplicatIon. An application may only include
f<J,>c: '2, [-2.:1['::10; ;::::;'c,-;ts:;.nly c,,~d r:llJS~ be used:n c:onjencHon planning a.ctivities necessary to develop one homeownersl"'vp
'i:~" ,-',',j ;;'-;6 t's (:::j'J;~'::';'71e::~s of, th? :-JC?E for Homeown- program. App!icants may submit ar. application for a planning
,,:::;' ') 0: ;:.::: ::: f2L";Y ;-,omes Prcgram, No;;ce of .Amended grant and an implementation grant :n response to anyone
c ./~: :.--,.' ,J'.',; 0<.:2(.: ,)2.;::J2ry 1l.. ~ 992, "nd:he Notice of NOFA; however, only 0ne app'icatcn wili be approved ror
:C.__ (~JOF j:,j sa~,?':: January' 1:, i 992. example. if an applicant submits both an implt:msntat;cr. and
, _. . , . ,p;annir.g grant application, the implementation grant wiil be
'~.-"" I ,. . .,. "prlCO C' ,'" un;:)c fe.r crneoH.'ne'sh'D
7 ...,'<:."...;.., '::'~"',"" N'. ,..,i;!:,'V,:: ': n ., .n' .'.'" reviewed and ranked first If the implementation grar.t f.::ils to
':-, $:;,,(: '-sm.,)' ,,0 ..as F':cgra:!1 (HC:Pt: 3) :s to ~S,SIS! eligible meet the threshold requirements described in the Notice of
:.P:.X~;cf:ts 10. dev'" :~~ h?i~.8')wne~~h:p o~POrtUnltl~S for low- Amended Program Guidelines and NOFA, the planning grant
lnC)r:,e ':;;,,'I!;,as ano Ir.dll/:dua!s Ltl:lzmg smgle family proper- application will be reviewed and considered for funding.
~:'cs OW;-18C '..)'j c2rt,,:n Federc;) agencies, State and/or local
gO'/8(;,,'I1I:.;':;3 2nd their 8Q9nc;ias and instn.Jmentalities, Public 5, MaxImum AssIstance Level. The amount of the plan-
r:.~\j;ing ;:,:;;c~,,:;c.s (PHAs) arid indian HOLising Authorities ning grant may not exceed $100,000,
(!H ~,.,
" """ 6. Matching FI.1'1ds. No matching funds are required for a
;'\0 applicant may ap;:,!yiN a HOPE 3 planning grant to assist planning grant.
ii !n.daslc;r::na a hOiT;3ownershi;J program, including acti'/ities 7 C I I f A I I' A' . . f d d d
,-, ".'" c:o tic> ;.... ,-,I +; f I .. 'j't + d d t' f ,omp at on 0 ct v t es. ctlvltles un e un er a
"'V~I, '"... . ,., C_I n,JI&C.on 0 a eaSlbl1 y s.u yan prepara Ion 0 I' h II b . d t 'thO 12 th f th
__ r--",v" '" ; - .1 "'" ~. ' n panning grant s a e carne ou WI In mon so e
",n a,e' _.......""t.0n [or an .n Ip.81' ,e. l.atIO,. grant. ff t' d f th t t
' e ec lYe ate 0 e gran agree men .
~ :::l'Sll,;,i<:: .';pp~jcalits. This application 1s to be !Jsed by (1) 6 0 I tI f II tl I ddl t th S' d d
ale nonprofit organizations, (2) cooperative associations, . rgan z~ o,n 0 app ca on. n a lion 0, . elan ar
VI ',3) p:Jblic bodies (including cities, counties, States, Indian Federal app.ltca~'on cover sheet ~Fo:m ~F 424, and the ,e:t-
tri':Jes, PHAs, lHAs, or any agency or instrumentality of a public clos.e? certification form, the application IS composed of eight
body) in coopera!ion with a private nonprofit organization. An exhibits.
2.pplicaticn submitted by a public body in cooperation with a 9, Final assembly of application. The application must be
private nonprofit organization must include an executed writ- assembled in the order shown in the Table of Contents.
ten 2greernent bet\Neen the public body and private nonprofit Submit the completed exhibit forms contained in this applica-
organization which delineates the respective rales and re- tion packet, including the Applicant Certification form, all
sponsbillUes that each party will have in connection with the exhibits, and all attachments. Upon assembling the entire ap-
planning activities described in the application. Applications plication, please (a) mark each exhibit with an appropriate
submitted on behalf of two or more entities must specify which Iiumber, (b) number every page of the application sequentially,
entity will assume legal responsibility as the recipient, and will (c) enter the appropriate page number of each application in a
execute the grant agreement. reproducible formaton g 1/2" by 11" paper. 8e sure to cespond
3. Appllcatlon Deadline. The deadline date wi!! be3peti- to eac~ ~p~licable e~hibit include~, in t~,~ Table of Contents. If
tied in the NOFA published in the Federal Register. One an exhibit IS not applIcable, enter N/A In the page colurlln of
originally signed application and two (2) copies must be the Table of Contents.
received by close of business on the deadline date in the HUD 10, Further Information. If you have any further question&
Field Oifice serving the area in which the applicant's program regarding your application or allY otlier aspect of the program.
is located. See the tist of HUD Field Offices in the NOFA. If call the HUD Field Office serving your area, as listed in the
tnere is more than one HUD Field Office in your State, NO FA.
telephone the offices to be sure that you are mailing to the
correct office. P,ppiications delivered after close of business of Note: Unless otherwise stated, all references to Sectbns in
ti,e deadline date published in the NOFA wi:1 not be accepted, the Exhibits refer to the Notice of Amended Program Guide-
\( ou will IJe noWied that your application has been received. lines, dated January 14, 1992,
Page I i I form HUO-400d6-A
.
. .
Certification of Consistency with the
Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS)
.
7he Appiic::~;,( mus~ provide 3. cer.ificatio'1 signed by the authorized pubEc offiC;c.11or the State or each unit ot genera' :cc2i
gO'iernn''3nt ';,,.;(i":inwYhich theeligibie properties propcsed for use in the program are iocated slating that the proposed activities
tire cO;,:oiS!3I,t with the CHAS for that State or wnit(s) at 9anerallocal government. This certification shou~d be attached !ol:owing
t:>s ..~;:;::.:>.:.2.,,~ S-:rti!\Ca~:on3, (Se:.:tion 310 (b)(5)(i))
;ecYnr.;,J;'~J::! ;0',,10: certf1caUor:
1. CH.i.S cG,ti;:ca:ion to accom~af1Y program fu~;dilig 2. CHAS cen.i:ications to 2..:;company program funding
,,',)pJisa:lon ill jurisdictions w;lt;!?e the CHAS or ablJre- application in jurisdictions where the CH/~S Qrab':lr~.
v;.:r/p.d :1ir<:,~8gy ;-.a.s 3!reC'~;y been appro'i8d by vla!ed strategy has been submItted to blrt :lCi ~'I?t
~~~JD: approved tly HUD:
The jcrisdiclion certifies the,: the proposed aclivrties The jurisdiction certnies that the propos;;;d activities
am cons'slent wjth its HU~ :_ ..:>pro'led Comprehensive are consistent with its Comprehensive Housing Af-
Housing i\ifordability S!;atfgy or Abbreviated Hous- fordability Strategy or Abbreviated Housing Strategy
iT1g Strategy Wiser: the apr 'opriate strategy). (insert the appropriate strategy) recently submit1ed or
now being submitted to HUD for approva~.
Silln<lturo 07 ?ubnc Otlir.ial P.eJ;Y.l~sib:" io, Submitting 1he CHAS SiQ'l;in;re of Public Official Reapon&ible for SL!bmitting the CHAS
Page I I form tiUD-40066.A.
;..
"
This effort is consistent with our approved Comprehensive Housing
Affordability. Strategy ( CHAS ) and the Housing Element of our
Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS
staff recommends the Commission approves the request to apply for
federal funds to plan a new homeownership program, not to exceed
$100,000. We further recommend the Commission approve the
request for staff to enter into an agreement with the Housing
partnership in order to develop and implement this new program.
'.;1IlI
'.
. AppHcant Certifications
(St.:bmlt a signe<J copy of this certification with the application)
T,lC app\;can: c2rt1fies that:
1. ;~ '.vi!: comply with the requirements of the Fair Housing Act 5. I! will ensure that no Federa!ly appropriated funds have
(42 _!.S.C. 36J1-i9) ane implementing regulations at 24 CFR been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned,
Pa:i ~OO, Pzrt 109, and Pa!1110; ::xecuLv3 Order 11063 for lobbying the Executive or Legislative Branches of the
(EJu;}j Cppoiiunity ;!! Ho~sing) <'.no implementing regulations Federal Government. (Refeno H1e government-wide common
2: 24 C;=R ?ar1 107; and Tille \II oj the Civii riights Act of 1964 rule governing the restrictions on lobbying, pub:ished as an
(/;2 US.C. 2000..::)(NClldiscriminatior. in ,=ec'eraily Assisted interim n..:le on February 26, 1990 (55 FR 6736) and sU:Jple-
Pfsgrar.ls) anj implementing regulatio'1s issued at 24 CFR mented by a Notice published ,June 15,1990 (55 FR 24540).
:::3,: 1, 2nd w'il aifirma.t;'v'e1} turther fCiir housing. For HUD. this nJle is found at 24 CFR Part 87.}
f=or :n'~:i2.n :ri'Jes, the tribe wiil comply with t:'e requirements of 7. It and its principals (a) are not presently debarred, sus-
th0 indi2il Civil RiJhts Act (25 U.S.C. 1301 e~ seq.) which oended. proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or invol-
ap;:;ii83 to tribes when they exercise their powers of self- untarily excluded from covered transactions (see 24 CFR
gO\iemrr:?:nt and is applicable in all cases when an Indian 24.110) by any Federal department or agency; (b) have not
!-1c:.Jsir~g ;\ut'10rity (IHA) has been established by exercise of within a three-year period preceding this application been
such powers. in the case 01 Indian tribes and IHAs, the convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them ior
2;Jplic2:Jt "ii:! comp:y with the requirements o~ the ir.dian Self- commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsifica-
Determ;naUc'1 and Education Assistance Act (see 25 U.S.C. tion or destruction of records, making false statements or
45C'3(b); 5:3FR 2L752-53 ::lild 24755 (June 13, 1990). revising receiving stolen property; (c) are not presently indicted for or
2<\ C:=R SS3.165(2) 2nd (b) and 905.360). otherwise criminally oreivilly charged by a governmental entity
2. it \',';ii ccrr.;:!;! 'JVi~11 the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 (Federal. State. or local) with commission of any of the of-
fenses enumerated in (b) of this cer1ification; and (d) have not
U.S.C. 6~ 0; -07) and implementing ;egulaticns at 24 CFR Part within a three year period preceding this application had one
'j 46, 'Nhieh prohibit rjiscriminaticn because of age in programs or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated
and c.Ct\/;iES receiving ~=:eder,d financial assistance. for cause or default. Where the applicant is unable to certify tc.
3. i, ',.vill compiy Witll Section 504 01 tile Re!1abiiitation Act of any other statement in this certification, such applicant shall
1373 (29 :';.::>.C. 784), as amended, and with implementing attach an explanation behind this page.
rq~%tior:s i<::~ 24 Sf-R Par. 8. which prohibit discrimination 8. It will comply with conflict of interest provisions referred to
C:152C on h~nci;c5.p in Faderaiiy-assisted and conducted pro- in S~ction 530 of the Notice of Amended Program Guidelines.
c!,ra.T~s and ~~(.tiv!ties. dated January 14, 1992.
4. it 'I.i!: c~n~ply with the poiicias. guidelines, and require- 9. It wl!l meet all applicable program requirements described
manis of 011.8 Circular A-87 (Cost Principles Applicable to in the Notice of Amended Program Guidelines. dated January
Granis. Con~(acts and ether Agreements with State and local 14, 1992, and any amendments thereto contained In the NOFA
Govemmenls). 24 CFR Part 85 (Administrative Requirements and Final Regulation.
for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and
Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments). OMB Cir- 10. It shall ensure that it has not and will not receive asslst9.nce
cular A-110 (Grants and Cooperative Agreements with Institu- from the Federal government. a State, or a unit of general local
tions of Hig:'er Education. Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit government, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, lor
Institutions), OMS Circular A-122 (Cost Principles Applicable activities for which funding is requested in the application.
to Grants. Contracts and Other Agreements with Nonprofit In-
stitutions), and audit req:Jirements described in OMS Circular
A-128 implemented at 24 CFR Part 44 and OMB Circular A-
133 (Audits of Institutions of Higher Learning and Other
Nonprofit Institutions).
5. a will provide drug-free workplaces in accordance with the
Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 and HUO's implementing
regulations at 24 CFR Part 24, Subpart F.
Signature uf Authonzeo Official
i:t:e or AuVlOr'zad Ofl>c:a1 I~
Page I I form HUD-40086-A
'.
.
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER;r~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~J5 - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
GRANTING OF AN EASEMENT TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
DATE: April 10, 1992
This item is before you to grant a ten foot easement lying in Block
50, Metcalf's Subdivision to Florida Power and Light. This easement
is necessary in order to provide electrical service to the North
Water Storage Tank. This was previously an overhead service. The
electrical service to this building was reconfigured as part of the
rehabili tat ion of the North Water Storage Tank; thus requiring the
installation of underground electrical service lines. The cost of
the underground service is in the construction contract.
Recommend approval of granting of 10 foot easement to Florida Power
and Light for the installation of underground electrical service to
the North Water Storage Tank.
...
HI'
.
. .
Box 2409, Delray Beach, Fl 33447.2409
r ! . 1 fl -, ''', -" : t" - . ,<", (' !; - i-': \1\ C F :~
F=PL . : " ',. . "- .. ,. .' ..
Q2 t' ;' '"I 11 ~.~ l' "0
. :..1 . J
.' il.' I I
. ,.'
,-..' . ' '..: ',) t~ L)
March 12, 1992
Mr. Howard Wight
City of Del ray Beach
100 N.W. 1 Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Re: Easement for North Reservoir
Dear Howard:
Enclosed is the easement required to provide electrical service to the North
Reservoir.
Please have the Mayor and City Clerk sign the original and return it to me for
recording. The signatures and names of two witnesses are to be written in the
spaces allowed. All signatures are to be notarized. Finally, please write in the
City's Tax J.D. Number in the upper left hand corner on the line for "Parcel 10#."
If you have any questions, please call me at 265-3104.
Yours truly,
;%~
A. G. Russillo, Jr.
FPL Account Manager
AGR:sp
an FPl Group company
,....
.
work Order' No. 5213-7-427 EASEMENT
THe ....,....... ,. ~ ~.. By I
Sec.-1i. Twp~S, R~ 43 E I
A. G. Ru s sill 0 I
Parcel 1.0. If Fl.ORIOA POWER" UGHT COMPANY i
PO BOX 2409 I
tMaiaIa...o by ~y~) F1.0. Addr_ I
FOftB 3722 (SIoduII) a.... 2192 . DELRAY BEACH, FL 33447 I
.
\----
The undersismed. in consideratioa of the paymeat of $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration. the Idequcy _ receipt
of wluch is -bereby ~ JIIIIl aoci give to Florida Power ck Ligbl C^~y, icsli<- . &pall. pit . _
a.SS1J:. au e--.-* forever forthe~o"erMiGuDli-~."'''' of~aoci .........-ie&.:u1c ~~ Ta:.,
(in udiag wi..., PO-.J':YS. cab.... cnnduitl - &p9WUlo-4 -'--1 _.a) to be iDsbned from em. to tame; wath ....... to
recoDSUUCt. i~. to. ea1up. chap the voltage, u well as. the size of ad remove such fKiliti_ or auy of ...........
an el-t ~ feel in width delcribed u foU~:
A 10 foot wide easement lying in Block 50 t~ETCALF'S SUBDIVISION of
Block 50 and 58, Town Of Delray, Florida, according to the Plat thereof
in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach
County, Florida, recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 47. The centerline of
said easement is more particularly described as follows:
Conmencing at the Northwest corner of said ~lock 50; thence S 090 00' 00"
W. (as a basis of bearing) along the west l1ne of Block,50, ,a dlsta~ce of
241.19 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence N. 880 41 08' E, a d,stance
of 144.00 feet to the end of said centerline and the end of said 10 foot
wide easement.
Containing 1,440 square feet.
~ with the ritt to permit ID, ocher ..... firm or ~ to dIda wires to la' faciliti_ ......... -laJ cable
CClDlbait widUa --~ * _ to operlIIe .. __ for c.o --..,.tioat ~ the ri.. of mp- _..-.. ...
preaa.. at all ti...-; die ript to cleu' the lIDd _ keep it c1..- of all ~ ~..-* ad odIer obItruc:tiaaI.........
--t area; to trim lad cut - keep trillllDld _ cut all deId. weak. leaaiDl or ....... ere. or limbl v-'" . ..1- 01 ....
~-t area wbida miPt interfere with or fall upc. die w....or .,..... 0 CQPIl..--....tiOll. or .= bL .. or
disuibution; ad m.u- ~ to die fu.IleIt _1111& 1M uadeni.... _1M power to p1IIIl. if at all. the Ii .............~
OD the lIDd Mncofore deKribed, over, UOIlI, IIIIder _ICIU. die raMs, IIreeb or bipways adjoiaiq or tbroup... .-41-&)'.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the UDdeniped bas liped _ -.led dIi8 m...'"-ul OD .19_.
Signed. sealed _ delivered
in the p.amce of: By:
~ :. '. .....)
(W.... .11'-') PriDt N!.t!2!11as E. ynch, Mayor
PriDl Addna: 100 NW 1 Avenue
Print Name (WtlMaa) Delray Beach. FL 33444
AtteIt: (~'...-.)
(w.... .1..-., Print~.ll~son MacGregor Harty, City Clerk
Print Name (w...., Print Address: 100 NW 1 Avenue
Delrav Beach. FL 33444
(Corponre Seal)
STATE OF AND COUNTY OF The forqoiag illSU1llllellt was ackDawIedpd
before me this day of . 19_. by . md
respectively the President and Secrecuy of
. a corporatioo, OD beUJf of sail
corpontion. who are penoaally known to me or bave produced u identification. and who did (did DOt) tab ID odl.
My CoDlllllSlioa ~: (Type of 1deai6caliaa)
~
N-., Mia, ~ -
Print Name
k'.
.
.
SKETCH OF EASEMENT N I
i
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY I
I
- I
... I
N.W. 3rd ST. (Platted .Sutton Street.)
(50' Right of 'Jay)
~\.p.;nt -;, Camm..com.nt -- -
N. 89.09'00. w. NOT TO SCALE
N.W. Corner of Blocl: 50
...... 0 ;
, (" "? I
....: -I
'" .. .:J.
en ~ "'" . I ~ I
is N BASIS OF BEARING I co
~ or'
o ......
fl ~ ~ --
~ . I :J
Lot 21, Block 50 I -'
as - 0 Hi
::: Q 0 -- u_ I
~ ~ (:) N. 89.09'00. W. 135.6'
Q.. 01 0 I
.........- .
. 0: 0 I
...... 0 I I
t.n 0 . ,
In '"
'0 ..... 0
c: Lf)
N .:J.
~ 2l
:Z c::l
"?
a
-'
I
, ,
I I
I ---- \
I ~'_ 89.09'00. W:.._ 135.6'
1--
0
l- ll)
z Lot 19. B10cl< 50
2i , ->><.
Q.. I ~
a:l
'"
....
0
-'
LEGAl DESCRIPTION'
A 10 foot wide easement lying In Block 50, METCALF'S SUBDIVISION of
Block 50 and 56, Town of DeJray, Florida, according to the Plat thereof in
the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County,
Florida, recorded inllat Book 10, Page 47. The center I ine of said easement
Is more particularly: described as follows:
I Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Block 50; thence S.OO.OO'OO'
W. (as a basis of bearing) along the west line of Block 50, a distance of
241.19 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence N. 88.41'08. E., a distance of
144.00 feet to the end of said centerline and the end of said 10 foot wide
easement.
Containing 1,440 square feet.
"~~L~~
MICHAEL J. MILLER 4034
IIl'llllNCIS
, ICAI.l Nt::I/Vi! MILLER LAND SURVEYING L>- ~ l!:$
/"1.:T1'"1 '01 NO
011 :7:2-0093
. .-'? R. P.O. BOX 3&18 407-586-2669
'llLD
"Tf .&'E8. /O~/~:J2. LANTANA. FLORIDA 33465 S./39.2r'
...
,.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
r~' ;;
FROM: CITY MANAGER!l! '
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i ~c: - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
RATIFICATION OF EMERGENCY REPAIR
DATE: April 10, 1992
At the March 11, 1992 regular meeting, the Commission approved the
award of contract for equipment rental and emergency assistance with
Johnson- Davis, Inc., Belvedere Construction, and W. Jackson and Sons
Construction. This 'contract provides that as needed, the Public
Utilities Division will call these three contractors and request them
to submit a total price to complete emergency work.
Subsequently, there was a break in a sanitary sewer line, located on
S.E. 2nd Street between Swinton Avenue and the FEC Railroad.
Johnson-Davis submitted a low bid of $28,000 to remove and replace
328 linear feet of 12 inch vetrified clay pipe with PVC and to supply
and install one manhole 9/10 cut. This work was completed on April
1, 1992.
Recommend ratification of emergency repair and approve payment to
Johnson and Davis, Inc. in the amount of $28,000 with funding from
Water and Sewer Repair and Replacement Sewer System/Mains and Lines
(Account No. 442-5178-536-60.66).
.,.
.
. ,
,,-
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden
City Manager
FROM: George Abou-Jaoude
Deputy Director of Public utilities
SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER EMERGENCY REPAIR
S.E. 2ND STREET BETWEEN SWINTON AND RAILROAD
DATE: March 20, 1992
The Sewer Network Division, on Thursday, March 19, received a
phone call on a sink hole at the above mentioned location. We
visited the site and confirmed the call. There was more than one
sink hole in the pavement. The sanitary main was T.V.'d,
inspected and the results are as follows:
- The main is 328lf of 12 inches vetrified clay (2 to 3 feet
sections) . The main contains multiple joint cracks with
areas that have holes in the top. Depth to the main is
approximately 9.3 feet. We also need to replace a brick
manhole. The main is at the north side of a two lane road
about 7 feet from the edge of the sidewalk.
Methods of Repair:
Trenchless Dipe reconstruction system: This is per Palm Beach
County annual contract with Insituform.
- Mobilization $2,700.00 ~
- TV Inspection $200/hr 600.00
- Medium Cleaning $2.50/lf 820.00 ~
- 7.5mm Nominal Thickness $57/lf 18,696.00 0-' ;,J.-
for pipe
- By-pass Pumping $2.20/lf 722.00 7" ~
- Pump Operation $31.50/hr 252.00"(
- Tap Removal $1800/each 1,800. 00 ~.
- Traffic L. S. 230.00" ~~e"(
TOTAL $25,820.00 y~~
'i
This cost does not include manhole replacement or pave~
restoration for sink holes.
,
,
II.,
. .
Open cut and replacement:
.
Attached please find a fax reflecting cost by Johnson & Davis,
approved emergency contractor by City commission March 11, 1992. .
(Approximate cost $28,800).
Because of the condition of the pipe, I recommend open cut.
Please review and advise as soon as possible. Funding source
will b 442-5178-536-60.66.
! r ,)
; ,(J If' ji -
,/.., -~~....--.. ~
Approved Date
David T. Harden
City Manager
GA:smm
ATT:
File: Memos to City Manager
GAEMER.DOC
J,
.,
.. .,.
...--
'.
.
~
, , '
..
" JOH NSO'N.DA VIS INC.
,
~~
004 tit LLcHiA I r-1 U R 1 V E
&~ :It-lTr1ACr :-.
9 - "':1'" Oli' "
. ii> ", r. .j. ;~' LANTANA, FLORIDA 33462
. . <i'''' "
r 6', ''?' H',;".; ;.., ,,~ .
<;::., \ '~'r~ c::=o..,-~~, 0';
g:'. ,. .: -""{,G1 ':
~ U~~l~" 407..588.1170
\ 0 ' ,'._
-z... ;0 o~ .'
\?, " ~r 'J
. .. .~t O<'!~~'.JI.t?~it~.S". .
, o~ ...~,;.' ,; '(!' ,',.. ., 'r-':lt FltX NO. 407-585-5252
'" ", j,..:..,.,. ~.
:.~(,;TH" f\~O~"'"
DATE: 3- dO-Oj2-. ?AGES: :A-
(includir1g cover page)
TO: C/71 C;; UE 1M Y .&fiul) ,
ATTN: ,/1,1; C~.;7A7e. Abeu _f'J/)~VD~..
FROM: ~~6 . S//~A..,
MESSAGE
~fAS~ );C v /}A;~.[ A>> 7
C~a /cJU
OU.fs ') JdJv5. I
I
~-7$l~J rbv.
.- ...
.... .
. '.
. .
J - D
JOHNSON-DAVIS INC.
HEAVY CONSTRUCTlON . ~~1'J. UNDERGROUND VTlUTIES
804 HIl.UlAATH DRIVE
LANTANA. FlORIDA 334S2
407,588-1170
March 2 0 , 1992
City of Delray Beach
100 N.W. 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
RE: Bid #=92 -17
Dear Mr. Abou-Jaoude:
We respectfully submit the following proposal for your
consideration.
REMOVE A."iD REPLACE 328 LF OF J2 rr vep WITH 12" pvC
LUMP SUM.... _ _ . . . . . _ . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . _ _ . $ 2 5 . 00 0 . 00
SUPPLY AND INSTALL ONE MANHOLE 9/10 CUT
L~ SUM.... _ _ . . . . . - - . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,800.00
Our price includes labor and equipment, base replacement,
asphalt replacement.
We exclude supply of 12" PVC pipe, cost of density tests,
cost of permits, thermo stripping and ~ater meter deposit.
If proposal is acceptable we will schedule utility locations
and mobilize project as soon as possible.
If we may be of any further assistance, please contact our
office.
~ U
~ z:~. . vfi.
obert E. Spin
Vice President
RES/pmc
.
,.
, ,
!
I
i
)
'.
I:ITY DF DELARY BERtH , . , .
PURCHASE ORDER ~
PURCHASING DIVISION
" ,.) , ;, . 100 NW FIRST AVENUE
DATE: ,'), DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444
407/243-7160 ::107 ' C
THIS NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ML "
PACKING LISTS, LABELS, BILLS OF LADI
VENDOR: . SHIP TO: CORRESPONDENCE,
~ i II i II ( ,. I I' I ; ,(,\I T r: II '(' f: I. I, " Uf [lp 1 j';ly PPd ,_ h r- ., .,
. . " ~"',' I" ,'- I ,. . , ",' r' I ,. '" ~ I''''' .' , ,--,-r'. , " r-' ro.'....
1.' I I 1 I, I I I ~ t ii' I '"T'. l ./r_ 1- 1'1 './ _I fl.1 iI'-1l Ir". 1',1 f t'it ,-:" -. r'o 'l.' J 1__ I~.. ,-,>
I IIi!!, II J, ;: I. (,,~I]ir' I]~ '1 c; .. SWII'll CHI (WFt-IlJE
.. ~ I , r "'- ,~ . ...,..- " '-I . <'L '~ ,'1,1 c,
I J r' '_ I '~t' t I PCt ....,1 I
VENDOR NO. I DATE NEEDED: I FOB: 1 CONFIRM TO
'~. . J, 'j' fo'I I ..I." ') , " r , ~~ I T sr~UTl , I 'UI-II,ISU"
REQUISITIONED BY REQ. NO. TERMS
~,fii,' ) - l{\rH rpF ~ 'I T ( I ',,', f f.1t 1;- 1.1 ~I'1 ~vlri)O(-'iVi.7 268 IIET
LINE QUANTITY UOM DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE
NO.
I, ,'q:)()(". ,,',1.) If".) lJ ,': I'F PC; ::t Ie", nE,r-'~\ I F~ tJl- <'"31. r'li( 1 , . ',I "
I'." " , .' r". ,-,.. I r', ....~. ....r-r--.,...
.- [, ), f' III ~_lll.' . j I '''.r,f. I
Hi' T l.'~ ':;\ c~l"! J t I r 'J11 . rm
, .
. ,I I.... '1 . ,,- ,- I" ,rf'. r-'., ..,,... .... ...." 'I I
"'l_If', llll_, I f II. lolfr:. C". f" llf , It. '''' '_ I J
,"{} . : ~~, '_~ "J
r I " ,~ ..'" , ,.., ,- ,- .~ r,...' I """ "'"
1.1 II. I ',tl I.'" I " . t 11'1- ~ _. ~ 'I '-I , I~. t t I
! I)i' ,'I' "-':)1 )".'1' [\ P\ [' II '(
, '. I ,~ . , ,-. . r \' ,
, '.11" II ., . \1" I I , ' r
j'qTtll"
I \ 1"- &. , .', r-'" J ~-
I". I I 11 11 'r, .. ~
{\["[ 'I ':U \i r: D [l"( C Jl( t-li',fJr-,GER.
l~lU.UI.Ji,j [ : <1 4 2~) 1. ,7U~j:){)6066
HILL TO: APPROVED
CITY OF J>ELRAY BEACH
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
lUll N,W. 1st AVENUE ...- ,
J>ELRAY ImACH, FLORIUA 33444 ,- .
/' ,?
" , , I /- ,<J
",' . 1/' ,'" ,:"
FLORIIlA STATE SALES TAX EXEMPTION ~0~~'CHASINC;~~;;:;~'-- -_/
CERTIFIC ATE NO, 04-00219-08-60
ORIJER SUBJECT TO TERMS ,INIJ CONIJ/7'/ONS ,is ON RIiVERSE OR ,11TACHlW
REQUISTIONING DEPT.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER-f~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i 'l':D - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
RESOLUTION NO. 43-92
DATE: April 10, 1992
This is a resolution amending Resolution No. 32-85 to clarify the
Community Redevelopment Agency boundaries.
Staff discovered errors and omissions in three resolutions previously
adopted which describe the CRA boundaries. In order to rectify these
mistakes, the City Attorney's Office has drafted this resolution
which encompasses the entire CRA area and corrects those deficiencies.
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 43-92 clarifying the Community
Redevelopment Agency boundaries.
'.1.
.
.
4 C ~ .:: -. '3: j'" 5 S ~ ~ ~ ':! - .~ . 1 CO : ''7 : - -
CITv 8TTJRNEY'S OFFICE TEL ~ll], . - - ~ - - , ' .-
..
,,'
'IT' DF DELAA' IEA[H
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 200 NW 151 AVeNUE' DELRAY BEACH, FLORID" 33444
FACSIMILE 401/278.4755 W.&~..'. DL._.~ LLn_
(407) 243-70iO
MJ:NORANDUM
Date: April 9, 1992
To: city Conunis8ion
From: David N. Tolc.s, AS8i.tant City Attorn.~
Subject: eRA Boundary Resolution
This resolution clarifi.. the boundaries of the community
redevelopment area. Three previous resolutions describing the
area have been approved by the City Commission. There are
several errors and om1ssion. 1n the pr10r descr1ptions, and
this resolution correcta those errors and omissiona.
If you have any questions, please call.
ON'!' : ah
--...
Attachment
cc: David Harden, City Manager
Cheryl Leverett, Agenda Coord1nator
~ 43/9;}-
-
".
'"', ....., ~ ~ l = . - 1 -
TEl... No , 407 -\...... :. 4-c-= Hpr- '.\' 1;'_ ..... - ~ : .
HTTiJRNE\' '; OFFICE - . , ~ - -
eIn
~. .. .~...~_.... .,.
...
I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION or THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY lEACH, FLoRIDA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO,
32-805, SY REPEALING SECTION 4 AND ENACTING A NEW
SECTION 4, WHICH REFERENCES AN AMENDED APPENDIX j'A"
WHICH DESCRIBES TH! SLUM AHD SLIGHTED AREAS WITHIN
THE CITY or DELRAY IBACH, AS REQUIRED IN FLOR IDA
STATUTES, CHAPTER 153, PART III; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE OAT!.
WHEREAS, the City COlNI\iuion at the City of Del ray Beach,
Florida, did, on Mey 14, 198', adopt. Resolution NO, 32~8S finding thet
one or More .lum and bl1ghted are,.. .. detined in Florida Statutes
seet10n 163.340 or area. in which th.~e i. a shortage of housing afford-
able to re.ident. of lower moderate 1nco~e, includlnq the elderly, or a
combination thereot, eKi.t 1n the City of De1ray Beach; and
WHEREAS, the City Comm18aion of the City at Delray Beach,
Florida, ha. tound and declared in R..olution No. 32-85 that a need tor
rehabilitation, redevelopment, or a combination thereof, 18 nece.sary in
.uch area. in the intere.t of the public health, sa fety, morale I or
welfare of the re.idents ot the City of Delray Seach; and
WHEREAS, the City Commis.ion ot the City of De1ray Beach,
Florida, has found end declared in Resolution No, 32-85 that there i8 a
need for a Communi ty Redevelopment Agency to function 1n the City ot
Delray Beach to carry out the community redevelopment purposes of
Chapter 163, Part III of the Florida Statutea; and
WHEREAS, the City Commll1ion of the City of Delray Beach,
Florida, by Ordinance No. 45-85, adopted June 18, 1985, did create 4
Community Red.v.~opm.nt Agency a. provided in Florida Statute. Section
163.3'51 and I
WHEUAS , in Re.olut1on No. 32-85, R8Iolution No, 9-96, and
R..olution No. 47-81, the City commi..ion of the City of Oelray Beach,
Florida, found that one or mor.slum and blighted are.., as defined in
Florida Statute. Section 163.340, or area. in which there il " shortage
of hous1ng affordable to reSident. ot lower or moderate 1ncome,
including the elderly, or a combination thereot, ex1,t within the City
of Celray Beach and described the areas more fully in Appendix "A" of
each re.olution; and
WHEREAS, certain properties were .pUt by the boundary
de.cription. included within Appendix "A" of Resolution. No. n-a5,
g-e6, And 41-$7; and
WHEREAS, proper tie. outlide of the City of Delray BeAch City
limite were included in the original boundary de.cription; And
WHEREAS, t.he Delray Beach City CommU8ion 18 desirous of
correcting the minOr errors in the prev1ou. deacriptions, by incor-
porating the Appendixe. from R..clution Koa, 32-85, 9-86, and 47-87 into
one legal de.criptlon.
NOW, THEREFORE, Bt IT RESOLVED BY TH! CITY COMMISSION or THE
CITY or D!LRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS rOLLOWS~
'.~t10n te' That Section 2 of Resolution No. 9-86, and Section
4 of R..o ution o. 47-87 are hereby amended in their entirety and
replaced by the bo~ndari.. a. d.scribed in Exhib1t "A".
--.----
.
1....., ""....,.... ~"7 I""" ~ ,"', ._ - - . 1 =- . -, -
, _ ~ ~ ", ~ 'I E ,- ,~"" "" T 1- ~ T E! ~j I"' ,';.. 'i , _ - ',:: >-1 P , , : - - - - - -
C I T "'j' Hi: ,j ;.', ~ . ) U r l'" 1_ - ' ~ -' ..-
. . Section 2. That a new Se~tion 4 i8 hereby enacted to ~.ad 4S
. follow,:
,
. section 4. That the ar.a the City ot 081ray Beach more fully
: de.~r1bed 1n the .mended Appendix "A" 11 hereby tound and declared
to be 4 ,lum and blighted area, as deUned by and within the
~ purpo... and int.nt of Florida Statutel, Chapter 163, Part 3.
"
Sectlon 3. That ".,olutlon No. 47-87 ls hereby ratified and
,1 .11 properti.. lying within the ar.. d..cribed in Appendix "A" are
subject to exercl.e of right., power., and privilege. granted by Chapter
, 163, 'art III of the Flor1da Statute. upon the latter date of the
p...age of R.,olution No. 47-87 or the propertl.' annex.tion into the
Clty.
Section 4. That a. to any properti.. lying within the area
d..cribed 1n Appendix "A" which .1'. annexed into the City lubsequent to
the d.te of p....g. of this r..olution, that ..id prop.rties shall be
subject to the .x.rci.. of the right., power. and privileges granted by
Ch.pter 153, Put III of the Florida Statute. at the tIme of their
annex.tion if the City Commlulon deeermines that. .lum and bl1qhted
condition. rem.in.
Section 5. That the Clty Clerk be directed to forward 4
certlfied copy ot thi. resolutlon to the Palm Be.ch county Tax
Appral..ra Office.
Seet!Qn 6. That tni. re,olution shall become effective
immediately upon it. p....g..
PASSED AND AOOPTtD 1n regul.r Be..lon on the _ day of
I lU2.
MAY 0 R
ATT!ST:
I
I
City CluJc
'.
2 Rea. No.
II~'
407 ~':' 3: ,:1-:-S5 ~Cf- - ~ :~ ...., 15:~: - -
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL No, -
- , - -
, .
.
:>
...
" APPBHDIX A
AMENDED LEGaL DBSCRIPTI0N
COMMUNITY RBDBVBLOPMBH'1' AREA
Beginning at the intersection of the north right-of-way line of
N.W. 4th Street and the east right-of-way line of Swinton Avenue,
thence run westerly along the north right-of.way line of N.W. 4th
Street to N.W. 4th Avenue; thence run westerly along the north
right-of-way line of Lake Ida Road to the east right-of-way line
of the 8.4 Canal; thence run southwesterly along the E-4 Canal to
the east right-ot-way line of 1-95; thence run southerly along
the east right-ot-way line ot 1-95 to the north right-of-way line
of S.W. 10th Street; thence run easterly along S.W. 10th Street
to the weat right-ot-way line of S.E. 6th Avenue (u.s. #1
northbound); thence run northerly along S.B. 6th Avenue to the
north right-of-way line ot S.B. 2nd Street; thence run easterly
along said right-of-way line of 5.8. 2nd Street, and the easterly
projection thereat to the west right-of-way line of the
Intracoastal Waterway; thence run northerly along the west right-
of-way line of the Intracoastal Waterway to the south right-of-
way line of S.E. lat Street; thence run easterly along the
easterly projection of the south right-of-way line of S.E. 1st
Street to the east right-ot-way line of the Intracoastal
Waterway; thence run aoutherly along the east right-of-way line
ot the Intracoastal Waterway to its intersection with the
westerly projection ot the south right-ot-way line of Miramar
Drive; thence run easterly along the westerly projection of the
south right-of-way line of Miramar Drive and along the south
right-at-way line of Miramar Drive to the northeast corner of Lot
4 of the Williamson Deibel SubdiVision, 8S recorded in Plat Book
18, Page 55, Palm Beach County Records; thence run southerly
along the east lot line ot said Lot 4 to the south line of said
Williamson Deibel Sub~ivision; thence run westerly along the
south line of sai~ Williamson Deibel Subdivision to the east
right-ot.way line of Gleason Street; thence run southerly along
the east right-of-way line ot Gleason Street to the south line of
the Dover House Condominium; thence run easterly along the south
line of said Dover House COndominium to the west right-of-way
line of AlA; thence run northeasterly along the west right-Of-way
line Of AlA to the easterly projection of the north right-of-way
line of, Lowry Street; thence run westerly along the easterly
projection of, the north right-of-way line ot, and the westerly
projection of the north right-ot-way line of Lowry Street to the
weat right-af-way line Of the Intracoastal Waterway; thence run
northeaaterly along the we.t right-oi-way line of the
Intracoastal Waterway to the centerline Of the right-of-way of
N.R. lat Court; thence run westerly along the centerline of the
right-of-way of N.E. 1st Court to the west right-of-way line Of
N.E. 7th Avenue; thence run southerly along the west right-Of-way
line ot N.E. 7th Avenue to the south lot line of Lot 15 of BlOCk
115 of Town of Linton Plat as recor~ed in Plat Book 1, Page 3,
.
TEL No, 407 :.27:3 J7SS ~;g ~:i 7 I :~ .2 ::; _ 0 : "
CITY HTTORr~tV .:,.JFFICE , , ,
, 'lP
~
Palm Beach County Records; thence run westerly along the south
lot line of Baid Lot 15, and the westerly projection thereof to
the east lot line of Lot 5 of Block 115 of said Town of Linton
Plat; thence run northerly along the east lot line of said Lot 5,
and the northerly projection thereof to the southeast corner of
Lot 38 of The Hofman Addition, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page
3, Palm Beach County Records; thence run easterly along the
easterly projection of the south lot line of Lot 38 to the
Bouthea.t corner of Lot 49 at said Hofman Addition; thence run
northerly along the ea.t lot line Of said Lot 49 and the
northerly projection thereot to the nor~heast corner of Lot 44 of
said Hofman Addition; thence run we.terly along the north lot of
said Lot 44 and the we.terly projection thereof to its
intersection with ~he southerly prOjection of the east lot 11ne
of Lot 14, McGinley and Gosman's Subdivision, as recorded in Plat
Book 2, Page 87, palm Beach County Records; thence run northerly
along the southerly projection of the east lot line of said Lot
14, the east lot line of said Lot 14, and the northerly
projection ot the east lot line of .a1d Lot 14 to its
intersection with the centerline Of the abandoned N.B. 7th Court
right-of-way; thence run easterly along said centerline of N.E.
7th Court right-of-way to the west right-ot-way line of N.E. 7th
Avenue; thence run northerly along N.B. 7th Avenue to the
northeast corner of Lot 4~, MCGinley and Gosman's Subdivision, as
recorded in Plat Book 2, page 87, Palm Beach County Records;
thence run westerly along the north lot 11ne of said Lot 45 and
the westerly projection ~hereot to the southeast corner of Lot
59 of said McGinley and Gosman's Subdivis1on; thence run
northerly along the east lot line of said Lot 59 and the
northerly projection thereot to the north line of the Sophia Frey
Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 37, Palm Beach
County Records, thence run eaeterly along the north 11ne of said
subdivision to the southwest corner of the Martell Arms Plat, as
recorded in Plat Book 37, Page 133, Palm Beach Count~ Records;
thence run northerly along the we.t line of said Martell Arm.
Plat to the northwes~ corner ot said Martell Arms Plat; thence
run easterly along the north line ot sa1d Martell Arms Plat to
the weat.right-ot-way line Of N.B. 8th Avenue; thence run
northerly along the west right-ot-way 11ne of N.E. 8th Avenue to
the north line of Kenmont Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book
20, Page 65, Palm Beach County Records; thence run easterly along
the north line of 8aid subdivision to the west line ot the Denery
Lane Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 238, Palm
Beach County Recorda; thence run northerly along the west line Of
said subdivision to the south line ot La HaCienda Subdivision, as
recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 6, Palm Beach County recorda;
thence run easterly along the south line of said subdivision to
the west right-of-way line of the Intracoastal Waterway; thence
run northerly along the west right-ot-way line of the
Intracoastal Waterway to its intersection with the south town
limits of the Town of Gultstream; thence run westerly along said
south town limits to the SOutherly projection of the ea.t line of
Delray Beach Estat.., as recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 13, Palm
Beach County Recorda; thence run northerly along the southerly
'l1li
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL No, 40.7 273 J~SS A~:- :I~I?~ ~:::- ;: ,~
f .
..
~
-....
projection df, an~ the east line of said Delray Beach Estates to
ita intersection with the east right-of-way line of State Road 5
(U.S. *1); thence run southerly along said east right-Of-way line
to its intersection with the easterly projection Of the south lot
line of Lot 20 of Delray Beach Eatates as recorded in Plat Book
21, Page 13; thence run northwesterly along the easterly
projection of the south lot line of sai~ Lot 20, the south lot
line of said Lot 20, and the westerly projection of the south lot
line of said Lot 20 to the west right-of way line of Old Dixie
Highway; thence run northerly along the west right-of-way line Of
Old Dixie Highway to the south right-of-way line of Gulfstream
Boulevard: thence run westerly along Gulfstream Boulevard to the
east right-of way line of N.E. 2n4 Avenue; thence run southerly
along N.E. 2nd Avenue to the north right-of-way line of N.E. 8th
Street: thence run westerly along N.E. 8th Str.et to the east
right-of-way line of North Swinton Avenue; thence run southerly
along North Swinton Avenue to the point of beginning.
However, said area as defined by the boundaries described above
ahall not include such properties presently outside the
jurisdiction of the city of Delray Beach until such time as those
properti.. may be annexed by the City of Oelray aeach in which
event they .hall become part of the area.
..}
--------,--_....,-
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER '-~f;/"
~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i gE - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
RESOLUTION NO. 36-92
DATE: April 10, 1992
This is a resolution supporting the concept of AMTRAK service from
Jacksonville to Miami along the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway
corridor.
The Florida Department of Transportation and AMTRAK are in the
initial stages of negotiations with FEC for the use of their rail
corridor for passenger service. Establishment of service along this
corridor has the potential for providing improved, convenient service
between downtown centers along the east coast. The Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council has adopted a similar resolution and has
asked Treasure Coast cities to participate as well.
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 36-92 supporting the concept of
AMTRAK service from Jacksonville to Miami along the Florida East
Coast (FEC) Railway corridor.
",.
.
.
- --..----' ----- -~.__._---~- _.,--- -- --- -_.---,-----~ ~-- -- ------- ----
-
RESOLUTION NO. 36-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING THE CONCEPT
OF AMTRAK SERVICE FROM JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI
ALONG THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CORRIDOR.
WHEREAS, AMTRAK presently does not provide full service
to heavily populated coastal communities between Jacksonville and
Miami; and,
WHEREAS, the existing Florida East Coast freight rail
lines between Jacksonville, Delray Beach, and points south will
facilitate this service contingent upon improvements to
accommodate passenger train service; and,
WHEREAS, regular AMTRAK service along the East Coast
would provide Treasure Coast and Palm Beach County residents with
a transportation alternative, and better, more diverse service;
and,
WHEREAS, regular AMTRAK service would facilitate
inter-city transportation service and commerce by connecting
Treasure Coast communities such as Vero Beach, Ft. Pierce,
Stuart, and Delray Beach to Jacksonville and other important
destinations; and,
WHEREAS, such service could significantly enhance
ridership on the Tri-County Rail and metrorail, a facility of
significant State and Federal investment; and,
WHEREAS, a Delray Beach AMTRAK station on the Florida
East Coast rail line would further the City's goal of
revitalizing its downtown area,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City Commission of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, supports the concept of AMTRAK service
between Jacksonville and Miami along the east coast corridor of
the FEC, with a station in De1ray Beach, and supports the efforts
of the Florida Department of Transportation to initiate such
service as soon as is possible.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 14th
day of April, 1992 .
I
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
.
"'III'
'.
ecvure
coad
regIonal
Plannin, g
counc I
MEMORANDUM
To: County commi~Sio~~rs, Chairmen and Mayors
From: Daniel M. ca~
Date: March 24, 1992
Subj ect: AMTRAK Service
The Treasure Coast Regional Planning council adopted the
attached Resolution at its March 20, 1992 meeting. It
supports the concept of AMTRACK service between Jacksonville
and Miami within the FEC Corridor.
Council believes such service would benefit the Region and
its local governments in many ways, and would strongly
encourage and request that each local government send a
similar resolution supporting this concept to the FOOT in
Tallahassee. In order to have maximum impact, we would
encourage these resolutions be transmitted to FOOT by April
30, 1992.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
I ~
\~
~
i=lLr;; .
3221 s.w, martin downs bIvd.
suIM 205 . p.o, box 1529 .,....
palm city, 1I0f1da ~990
phoM (.07) 221-4060
sc 269.4060 lax (.07) 221.4067
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
'./. /
FROM: CITY MANAGER' II>'
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM if ~F - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
RESOLUTION NOS. 37-92 THROUGH 42-92
DATE: April 10, 1992
These are resolutions authorizing the execution of supplemental
agreements with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)
consenting to the assignment of Pipeline Agreements with the Seaboard
Coastline Railroad Company (CSXT) to FDOT.
The State of Florida, through DOT, has purchased the north/south rail
corridor located from West Palm Beach to Miami, from CSXT. As part
of the purchase, CSXT has assigned its interest, as specified in the
Pipeline Agreements, to FDOT. In order to effect the assignments
the City must consent to the assignments by entering into the
supplemental agreements with FDOT.
The City Attorney's Office and Engineering Department have reviewed
the supplemental agreements and recommend approval.
Recommend approval of Resolution Nos. 37-92 through 42-92 authorizing
the execution of supplemental agreements with the Florida Department
of Transportation (FDOT) consenting to the assignment of Pipeline
Agreements with the Seaboard Coastline Railroad Company (CSXT) to
FDOT.
.
.
.
.
.
-- - ._-~ - -- ---- -- - -.. ---- -..-- --_.,-----------
------ -- --~----- ---
- ----~--_.__.-
RESOLUTION NO. 37-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ("FDOT") CONSENTING
TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE PIPELINE AGREEMENT WITH
THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY ("CSXT")
AT A POINT 481 FEET NORTH OF THE RAILROAD I S
MILEPOST SX-987, DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, DATEO JULY
20, 1976.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF OELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That FDOT purchased the north/south rail
corridor located from West Palm Beach to Miami, Florida,
previously owned by CSXT. As part of the purchase, CSXT assigned
its interest in the agreement between the City of Oelray Beach
and CSXT, contract number SCL 25873 dated July 20, 1976. In
order to effect the assignment, the City of Delray Beach must
consent to the assignment of the agreement to FOOT, by entering
into the supplemental agreement with FOOT.
Section 2. That the City of Oelray Beach does hereby
consent to the assignment of the agreement from CSXT to FDOT, and
the Mayor, with the attestation of the City Clerk, be, and they
are hereby authorized to execute the supplemental agreement for
and on behalf of the City of Delray Beach.
Section 3. That this resolution shall take effect
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 14th
day of April, 1992.
MAY 0 R
ATTEST:
City Clerk
.
.
''.
,
.
~--- - --- ---- ~-- ~_.- '- ---- --
-------- ------ ----~---------------_.._-----------
.
RESOLUTION NO. 38-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ("FDOT") CONSENTING
TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE PIPELINE AGREEMENT WITH
THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY ("CSXT" )
AT A POINT 1,967 FEET SOUTH OF MILEPOST SX-987,
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, DATED JANUARY 15, 1985.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That FDOT purchased the north/south rail
corridor located from West Palm Beach to Miami, Florida,
previously owned by CSXT. As part of the purchase, CSXT assigned
its interest in the agreement between the City of De1ray Beach
and CSXT, contract number SBD 6692 dated January 15, 1985. In
order to effect the assignment, the City of De1ray Beach must
consent to the assignment of the agreement to FDOT, by entering
into the supplemental agreement with FDOT.
Section 2. That the City of Delray Beach does hereby
consent to the assignment of the agreement from CSXT to FDOT, and
the Mayor, with the attestation of the City Clerk, be, and they
are hereby authorized to execute the supplemental agreement for
and on behalf of the City of Delray Beach.
Section 3. That this resolution shall take effect
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 14th
day of April, 1992.
MAY 0 R
ATTEST:
City Clerk
#.
f
.
.
.
--- ~_..- -- -- ----~------- --- --~
-- --_._--~-----_.-------
RESOLUTION NO. 39-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ("FDOT") CONSENTING
TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE PIPELINE AGREEMENT WITH
THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY ("CSXT")
AT A LOCATION 1,958 FEET NORTH OF THE RAILROAD'S
MILEPOST SX-989, DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, DATED
OCTOBER 12, 1959.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That FDOT purchased the north/south rail
corridor located from West Palm Beach to Miami, Florida,
previously owned by CSXT. As part of the purchase, CSXT assigned
its interest in the agreement between the City of Delray Beach
and CSXT, contract number SAL 55939 dated October 12, 1959. In
order to effect the assignment, the City of Delray Beach must
consent to the assignment of the agreement to FDOT, by entering
into the supplemental agreement with FDOT.
Section 2. That the City of Delray Beach does hereby
consent to the assignment of the agreement from CSXT to FDOT, and
the Mayor, with the attestation of the City Clerk, be, and they
are hereby authorized to execute the supplemental agreement for
and on behalf of the City of Delray Beach.
Section 3. That this resolution shall take effect
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 14th
day of April, 1992.
MAY 0 R
ATTEST:
City Clerk
..
.
'.
.
--. --..- --- - _..~- ----- . -- ,--- - --- .. -- ....~- ------- -- ---. -- "--------- .-------- -
------- -~-.- ------
_.~-_._-- - .--
RESOLUTION NO. 40-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ("FDOT") CONSENTING
TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE PIPELINE AGREEMENT WITH
THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY ("CSXT" )
AT A POINT 1,682 FEET SOUTH OF MILEPOST SX-989,
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, DATED OCTOBER 13, 1987.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That FDOT purchased the north/south rail
corridor located from West Palm Beach to Miami, Florida,
previously owned by CSXT. As part of the purchase, CSXT assigned
its interest in the agreement between the City of Delray Beach
and CSXT, contract number CSX 4789 dated October 13, 1987. In
order to effect the assignment, the City of De1ray Beach must
consent to the assignment of the agreement to FDOT, by entering
into the supplemental agreement with FOOT.
Section 2. That the City of Delray Beach does hereby
consent to the assignment of the agreement from CSXT to FDOT, and
the Mayor, with the attestation of the City Clerk, be, and they
are hereby authorized to execute the supplemental agreement for
and on behalf of the City of Delray Beach.
Section 3. That this resolution shall take effect
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 14th
day of April, 1992.
MAY 0 R
ATTEST:
City Clerk
'"
,
.
.
.--::..:.:-=--::----:..-:..:.:.....:...-:--=::...:~ - --=:=-:::-~===-===-=-.-=.::=::::.--..==..--=----==~--::.. --
- u_.____n ----- '--~ "-----------------
RESOLUTION NO. 41-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ("FDOT") CONSENTING
TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE PIPELINE AGREEMENT WITH
THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY ("CSXT")
AT A POINT 1,930 FEET SOUTH OF MILEPOST SX-987,
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, DATED MAY 14, 1971.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That FDOT purchased the north/south rail
corridor located from West Palm Beach to Miami, Florida,
previously owned by CSXT. As part of the purchase, CSXT assigned
its interest in the agreement between the City of Delray Beach
and CSXT, contract number SCL 9290 dated May 14, 1971. In order
to effect the assignment, the City of Delray Beach must consent
to the assignment of the agreement to FDOT, by entering into the
supplemental agreement with FDOT.
Section 2. That the City of Delray Beach does hereby
consent to the assignment of the agreement from CSXT to FDOT, and
the Mayor, with the attestation of the City Clerk, be, and they
are hereby authorized to execute the supplemental agreement for
and on behalf of the City of Delray Beach.
Section 3. That this resolution shall take effect
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 14th
day of April, 1992.
MAY 0 R
ATTEST:
City Clerk
l:-
f
,."
.
----- ---- --- --------
--~. --- - - ----- _._------~ ---------------~ - - - -----
.
RESOLUTION NO. 42-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ("FDOT") CONSENTING
TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE PIPELINE AGREEMENT WITH
THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY ("CSXT")
AT A POINT 1,971 FEET NORTH OF MILEPOST SX-989,
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, DATED FEBRUARY 18, 1981.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That FDOT purchased the north/south rail
corridor located from West Palm Beach to Miami, Florida,
previously owned by CSXT. As part of the purchase, CSXT assigned
its interest in the agreement between the City of Delray Beach
and CSXT, contract number SCL 33063 dated February 18, 1981, In
order to effect the assignment, the City of Delray Beach must
consent to the assignment of the agreement to FDOT, by entering
into the supplemental agreement with FDOT.
Section 2. That the City of Delray Beach does hereby
consent to the assignment of the agreement from CSXT to FDOT, and
the Mayor, with the attestation of the City Clerk, be, and they
are hereby authorized to execute the supplemental agreement for
and on behalf of the City of Delray Beach.
Section 3. That this resolution shall take effect
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 14th
day of April, 1992.
MAY 0 R
ATTEST:
City Clerk
#.
,
.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LAWI'OI'l cnlLES SOUTHEAST FLORIDA RAIL CORRIDOR - DISTRICT 4 BP' G. lII"TTS
GOVEIlI'IOR 780 Southwest 24th Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33315-2696 ~CRn""'I'
Telephone (305) 797-8354
March 10, 1992
Gerald Church
City of Delray Beach, a municipal corporation under the laws of the
state of Florida
100 N. W. 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
RE: Agreement with Seaboard
System Railroad ("CSXT" )
No: SCL 33063
Date: 2-18-81
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The State of Florida, through its Department of Transportation, has
purchased the north/south rail corridor located from West Palm Beach
to Miami, Florida, previously owned by CSXT. As part of the purchase,
CSXT has assigned its interest in the above-referenced agreement to
the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, and it is
necessary that the agreements be supplemented or cancelled.
We have revised our Supplemental Agreement to make it consistent with
changes in the Florida Statutes and the Department of Transportation
policies and procedures. Enclosed please find two copies of this
agreement for proper execution. If a governmental agency, a copy of
the resolution authorizing the execution of the document should
accompany the executed agreements when they are returned for our
signature. Please return both executed agreements in the pre-
addressed envelope within (30) thirty days of receipt. If there have
been any corrections, revisions, or you no longer have responsibility
for the agreement, please advise this office. Upon execution on
behalf of the Department of Transportation, we will return an original
fully executed agreement for your files. We appreciate your
cooperation.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding this matter,
please contact Cindy Davies by mail or by calling her at (305) 797-
8354.
Si~r;,;t/ L
Charles A. NiCkerson, P.E.
Manager of Engineering and Operations
CAN:dp
Enclosures .
;'.
FORM 575-065-06-a
- R/W - 02/91
Page 1 of 5
~ STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SUPPLBMBB'J.'AL AGRBBKBIf'l'
Number of Assigned Contract: SCL 33063
Date of Agreement: 2-18-81
DOT File Number: 810.9894
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT made and entered into this
day of , 19____ by and between:
state of Florida, Department of Transportation,
an agency of the state of Florida,
hereinafter referred to as "FDOT"
and
City of Delray Beach, a municipal corporation under the laws of the
state of Florida
hereinafter referred to as "ASSIGNED PARTY"
is intended to supplement and amend that certain above-referenced
agreement between CSX Transportation, hereinafter referred to as
"RAILROAD II and the ASSIGNED PARTY, by addi~g or altering certain
terms and conditions as hereinafter set forth. It is the intention
of the parties that FDOT replace RAILROAD and be bound by all
obligations and receive all benefit of the above-referenced
agreement. The ASSIGNED PARTY hereby represents that the above-
referenced agreement currently is in full force and effect between
the ASSIGNED PARTY and RAILROAD or its assigns.
WHEREAS RAILROAD has assigned the above-referenced agreement
to FDOT; and
.
- FORM 575-065-06-a
R/W - 02/91
. Page 2 of 5
.
WHEREAS said agreement shall be amended as hereinafter set
forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, it is
mutually agreed that, not withstanding anything to the contrary in
the above-referenced agreement, said agreement shall be
supplemented and amended as follows:
1- Assiqnment. The ASSIGNED PARTY assumes and consents to
the assignment of the above-referenced contract (including all
previous supplements hereto or assignments thereof).
2. Termination. This agreement and the above-referenced
contract shall be cancellable by either party upon thirty (30) days
written notice with or without cause.
3. Indemnification. ASSIGNED PARTY assumes and agrees to
indemnify, protect, defend and save harmless FOOT, and any and all
of the assigns or licensees of FOOT for any act or occurrence to
the extent and in the same manner ASSIGNED PARTY has previously
agreed in the above-referenced agreement, and, in addition thereto,
and not in limitation thereof, ASSIGNED PARTY agrees that it will
indemnify and hold harmless FOOT and all of FOOT's officers,
agents, and employees from any claim, loss, damage, cost, charge or
expense arising out of any act, action, neglect or omission by
ASSIGNED PARTY during the performance of the agreement, whether
direct or indirect, and whether to any person or property to which
FOOT or said parties may be subject, except that ASSIGNED PARTY
will not be liable under this section for damages arising out of
,.;,
- FORM 575-065-06-a
R/W - 02/91
. Page 3 of 5
..
injury or damage to persons or property directly caused or
resulting from the sole negligence of FOOT or any of its officers,
agents, or employees.
4. Further Assignment. This supplement and the underlying
agreement can be assigned by FOOT upon sixty (60) days prior
written notice to ASSIGNED PARTY by certified mail, return receipt
requested.
5. Notice Provision. ASSIGNED PARTY agrees to send FOOT any
notice required under this supplement and the underlying agreement
via certified mail, return receipt requested to Charles A.
Nickerson, Manager, 780 S. W. 24th street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
33315.
Nothing contained in this Notice Provision, however, is intended to
supersede or supplement any other notice provision provided by
Florida law.
FOOT agrees to send any notice required under this contract to
ASSIGNED PARTY at the address contained in the underlying
agreement, unless otherwise notified in writing.
6. Payment Provision. ASSIGNED PARTY shall make all
payments due under the above-referenced agreement, and any
suppl~ments or amendments thereto, to the , Florida Department of
Transportation, 605 Suwannee Street, Mail Station 42, Tallahassee,
Florida 32399-0458, Attn: Cashier's Office - unless otherwise
advised in writing.
7. Right to Reneqotiate. Nothing contained herein shall be
.
.
- FORM 575-065-06-a
R/W - 02/91
. Page 4 of 5
..
construed to limit either party's right to renegotiate any
provisions, including but not limited to the payment provision or
provisions, of this supplement or the underlying agreement.
8. Other Provisions. All other provisions of the above-
referenced underlying agreement including previous supplements
thereto or assignments thereof which are not in conflict with this
supplement and the underlying agreement are hereby adopted,
ratified and confirmed, and incorporated herein by reference, and
shall continue in full force and effect and be binding upon the
parties hereto.
;.
..' FORM 575-065-06-a
-
R/W - 02/91
. Page 5 of 5
or
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Supplement Agreement in duplicate on the day and year first above
written.
ATTESTS STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
By:
Executive Secretary Title: District Secretary
witnesses ASSIGNED PARTY
By:
Title:
DOT Legal Review
By:
.
- .
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER {ft/1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i f G - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
RESOLUTION NO. 34-92
DATE: April 10, 1992
This item is a Resolution assessing costs for abatement action
required to remove junked/abandoned vehicles on 15 properties
located wi thin the City. The Resolution sets forth the actual
costs incurred and provides the mechanism to attach liens on
these properties in the event the assessments remain unpaid.
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 34-92 assessing costs to
remove junked/abandoned vehicles on 15 properties located within the
City.
.
'-' ".11
-
.
'.
_ ~ ~~-_.__._-----_._-_.-~~_._--- _ ------_._..._-~ --_._-~------ ----_._--_._------
---~.--_.~-------_.__._---_._-
. ____. _.___"._ u_.__._.___
RESOLUTION NO. 34-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 90 OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS
FOR ABATING NUISANCES BY REMOVING JUNKED AND/OR ABANDONED
VEHICLES WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH; SETTING OUT
ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH
ABATEMENT AND LEVYING SAID COSTS; PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND INTEREST ON ASSESS-
MENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE RECORDING OF THIS RESOLUTION,
AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO BE A LIEN UPON THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY FOR UNPAID ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE
MAILING OF NOTICE OF LIEN.
WHEREAS, the City Manager or his designated representative
has, pursuant to Chapter 90 of the Code of Ordinances, removed junked
and/or abandoned vehicles owned by persons described in the list
attached hereto and made a part hereof, for violation of the provisions
of Chapter 90 of the Code of Ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 90 of the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Delray Beach, the City Manager or his designated represent-
ative has determined that a nuisance existed in accordance with the
standards set forth in Chapter 90 of the Code of Ordinances, and did
furnish the respective owner(s) of the land(s) described in the
attached list with written notice of public nuisance pursuant to
Sections 90.02 and 90.03 of the Code of Ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, the property owner (s) named in the list attached
hereto and made a part hereof did fail and neglect to remove said
junked and/or abandoned vehicles, and thus failed to abate the nuis-
ance(s) or to properly request a hearing pursuant to Chapter 90 within
the time limits prescribed in Chapter 90 of the Code of Ordinances, or
if the property owner(s) did request and receive a hearing, said
property owner(s) failed and/or neglected to abate such nuisance(s) as
required by Chapter 90 of the Code of Ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach, through the City Adminis-
tration or such agents or contractors hired by the City Administration
was therefore required to and did remove said junked and/or abandoned
vehicles owned by persons described in the list attached and made a
part hereof and incurred costs in abating the subject nuisance(s); and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach has,
pursuant to Chapter 90 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray
Beach, submitted to the City Commission a report of the costs incurred
in abating said nuisance(s) as aforesaid; and,
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray beach,
pursuant to Chapter 90 of the Code of Ordinances desires to assess the
cost of said nuisance(s) against said property owner(s),
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS
Section 1. That assessments in the individual amounts as
shown by the report of the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach,
involving the City's cost of abating the aforesaid nuisances a copy of
which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby levied
against the parcells) of land described in said report and in the
amount(s) indicated thereon. Said assessments so levied shall, if not
paid within thirty (30) days after mailing of the notice described in
f
HI'
~
.
-
---- - ----~._---_. - .-- .-.._--~~--
-.-.----.---____..0 _~___ ___ ----- -- ----
-_..~...._- ------------..---.-.--.---.- _._----------_._------~--
Section 3, become a lien upon the respective lots and parcells) of land
described in said report, of the same nature and to the same extent as
the lien for general city taxes and shall be collectible in the same
manner and with the same penalties and under the same provisions as to
sale and foreclosure as City taxes are collectible.
Section 2. That such assessment shall be legal, valid and
binding obligat~ons upon the property against which said assessments
are levied.
Section 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach is
hereby directed to immediately mail by first class mail to the owner(s)
of the property, as such ownership appears upon the records of the
County Tax Assessor, notice(s) that the City Commission of the City of
Delray Beach on the has levied an
assessment against said property for the cost of abatement of said
nuisance by the City, and that said assessment is due and payable
within thirty (30) days after the mailing date of said notice of
assessment, after which a lien shall be placed on said property, and
interest will accrue at the rate of 8% per annum, plus reasonable
attorney's fees and other costs of collecting said sums.
Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective thirty
(30) days from the date of adoption and the assessment(s) contained
herein and shall become due and payable thirty (30 ) days after the
mailing date of the notice of said assessment(s) , after which a lien
shall be placed on said property(s) , and interest shall accrue at the
rate of eight (8) percent per annum plus, if collection proceedings are
necessary, the costs of such proceedings including a reasonable
attorney's fee.
Section 5. That in the event that payment has not been
received by the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the mailing
date of the notice of assessment, the City Clerk is hereby directed to
record a certified copy of this resolution in the public records of
Palm Beach County, Florida, and upon the date and time of recording of
the certified copy of this resolution a lien shall become effective on
the subject property which shall secure the cost of abatement, interest
at the rate of 8%, and collection costs including a reasonable
attorney's fee.
Section 6. That at the time the City Clerk sends the
certified copy of this resolution for recording, a notice of lien, in
the form of prescribed in Section 90.06 of the Code of Ordinances, shall
be mailed to the property owner.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the
day of , 1992.
MAY 0 R
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-2- Res. No. 34-92
.
I''''
-
.
. -
COST OF ABATING NUISANCES UNDER CHAPTER 90
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OWNER ASSESSMENT
LOT 20, BLK 23, TOWN OF DELRAY, MARY PATMAN $ 38.70
PB 10, P 69, PUBLIC RECORDS, 229 S.W. 6TH AVENUE 65.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 (RECORDING)
(229 SW 6TH AVENUE)
LOT 4, BLK 64, PT OF SUB OF LEVERT JR. & DEVONNE $ 38.50
BLK 64, DELRAY BEACH, PB 20, HERRINGTON 65.00 (ADM. COST)
P 39, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM 316 S. SWINTON AVENUE (RECORDING)
BEACH COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444
(316 S SWINTON AVENUE)
E390.05' OF N244' OF E3/4 OF GERALD J. PALLER $ 38.50
LOT 11, (LESS E33' RD R/W) , MARYANN L. PALLER 65.00 (ADM. COST)
SUB OF SEC. 20-46-43, PB 28, C/O DEER PARK (RECORDING)
P 68, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM 3111 S. DIXIE HWY. #137
BEACH COUNTY, FL W. PALM BEACH, FL 33405-
(SW 8TH STREET) 1575
LOT 31, BLK 11, OSCEOLA PARK, JIM AND JANICE SOODEEN $ 38.50
PB 3, P 2, PUBLIC RECORDS, 317 S.E. 4TH AVENUE 65.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 (RECORDING)
(621 SE 3RD AVENUE)
LOTS 5 & 6, BLK 2, BELAIR R.I. & ERMA B. MITCHELL $ 38.50
HEIGHTS, DELRAY, PB 20, P 45, 2445 DUNN AVENUE #306 65.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH JACKSONVILLE, FL 32218 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL
(31-35 SW 9TH AVENUE)
LOT 24, BLK C, WEST SIDE J.A. & LUCILLE D. HOWARD $ 38.50
HEIGHTS, DELRAY, PB 13, P 61, 902 N.W. 1ST STREET 65.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL
(902 NW,lST STREET)
LOT 1, BLK 10, ATLANTIC W. & ANNIE L. THOMAS $ 38.50
GARDENS, DELRAY, PB 14, P 63, 201 S.W. 11TH AVENUE 65.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL
(201 SW 11TH AVENUE)
LOTS 1 TO 10 INC. & LOTS 13 TO S & S ONE LTD. $ 19.25
21, INC., BLK. 1, DELRAY BEACH 3300 S. CONGRESS AVE #7 32.50 (ADM. COST)
HEIGHTS EXT. SEC. B, PB 27, BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426 (RECORDING)
P 10, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FL
(SW 16TH AVENUE)
-3- Res. No. 34-92
.. ,,"
- ,
.
.-
LOTS 11 & 12, BLK 1, DELRAY S & S ONE LTD. $ 19.25
BEACH HEIGHTS EXT. SEC. B, 3300 S. CONGRESS AVE #7 32.50 (ADM. COSTJ
PB 27, P 10, PUBLIC RECORDS, BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426 (RECORDING
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL
(SW 16TH AVENUE)
LOTS 1-10 INC. & LOTS 13 TO 21 S & S ONE LTD. $ 19.25
INC., BLK 1, DELRAY BEACH 3300 S. CONGRESS AVE #7 32.50 (ADM. COST)
HEIGHTS EXT, SEC. B, PB 27, BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426 ( RECORDING)
P 10, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FL
(SW 16TH AVENUE)
LOTS 11 & 12,BLK 1, DELRAY S & S ONE LTD. $ 19.25
BEACH HEIGHTS EXT. SEC. B, 3300 S. CONGRESS AVE #7 32.50 (ADM. COST)
PB 27, P 10, PUBLIC RECORDS, BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426 (RECORDING)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL
(SW 16TH AVENUE)
N50' OF S300' OF E135' OF OLIVE M. WESTER $ 38.50
w285' OF S 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF 126 N.W. 11TH AVENUE 65.00 (ADM. COST)
LOT 6, SUB OF SEC. 17-46-43, DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 (RECORDING)
PB 1, P 3, PUBLIC RECORDS,
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL
(126 NW 11TH AVENUE)
LOTS 10 & 11, C.H. DIGGANS DAVID J. SIMMONS, GRDN. $ 38.50
SUB./BLK. 55, TOWN OF LINTON, FOR LUCIUS SIMMONS III 65.00 (ADM. COST)
PB 8, P 58, PUBLIC RECORDS, 3836 DOLPHIN DRIVE (RECORDING)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33445
(225 SW 2ND AVENUE)
LOT 29, BLK 2, DELRAY SHORES, CARMEN LAMISERE $ 38.50
PB 24, P 233, PUBLIC RECORDS, BEATRICE WILLIAMS 65.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL 21 S.E. ANGLER DRIVE (RECORDING)
(21 SE ANGLER DRIVE) DELRAY BEACH, FL 33445
LOT 8, BLK 2~ DELRAY SHORES, EDITH CARRINGTON $ 38.50
PB 24, P 233, PUBLIC RECORDS, 20 DAVIS ROAD 65.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33445 (RECORDING)
(20 DAVIS ROAD)
VIOLATION IS: SECTION 90.03 - STORING, PARKING OR LEAVING WRECKED OR
INOPERABLE MOTOR VEHICLES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY; EXCEPTIONS
-4- Res. No. 34-92
"<0 '."
-, .
.
"
. ..
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGERb]v1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i C;S H - MEETING OF APRIL 14 . 1992
RESOLUTION NO. 35-92
DATE: April 10, 1992
This item is a Resolution assessing costs for abatement action
required to remove nuisances on 38 properties located within the
City. The Resolution sets forth the actual costs incurred and
provides the mechanism to attach liens on these properties in the
event the assessments remain unpaid.
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 35-92 assessing costs for
abating nuisances on 38 properties located within the City.
., I."
~ ,
..
.
--- ---.--- - .- -- - -------- _.-
- 0._"_- ____ _________
-~------- --.---
--"-
RESOLUTION NO. 35-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 100 OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS
FOR ABATING NUISANCES UPON CERTAIN LAND(S) LOCATED WITHIN
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH AND PROVIDING THAT A NOTICE OF
LIEN SHALL ACCOMPANY THE NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT; SETTING
OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH
ABATEMENT AND LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH ABATEMENT OF
NUISANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE
DATE AND INTEREST ON ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE
RECORDING OF THIS RESOLUTION, AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO
BE A LIEN UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR UNPAID ASSESS-
MENTS.
WHEREAS, the City Manager or his designated representative has,
pursuant to Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances, declared the exis-
tence of a nuisance upon certain lots or parcels of land, described in
the list attached hereto and made a part hereof, for violation of the
provisions of Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 100.20, 100.21 and 100.22 of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, the City Manager or his
designated representative has inspected said land(s) and has determined
that a nuisance existed in accordance with the standards set forth in
Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances, and did furnish the respective
owner (s) of the land (s) described in the attached list with written
notice of public nuisance pursuant to Sections 100.20, 100.21 and 100.22
of the Code of Ordinances describing the nature of the nuisance(s) and
sent notice that wi thin ten (l0) days from the date 0 f said notice
forty-two (42) days in the case of violation of Section 100.04 pertain-
ing to seawalls) they must aoate said nuisance, or file a written
request for a hearing to review the decision that a nuisance existed
within ten (10) days from the date of said notice, failing which the
city of Delray Beach would proceed to correct this condition by abating
such nuisance, and that the cost thereof would be levied as an assess-
ment against said property; and,
WHEREAS, the property owner(s) named in the list attached
hereto and made a part hereof did fail and neglect to abate the
nuisance(s) existing upon their respective lands or to properly request
a hearing pursuant to Section 100.21 and 100.22 within the time limits
prescribed in said notice and Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances, or
if the property owner(s) did request and receive a hearing, said prop-
erty owner(s) failed and/or neglected to abate such nuisance(s) within
the time designated at the hearing wherein a decision was rendered
adverse to the property owner(s); and,
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach, through the City Administra-
tion or such agents or contractors hired by the City Administration was
therefore required to and did enter upon the land (s) described in the
list attached and made a part hereof and incurred costs in abating the
subject nuisance(s) existing thereon as described in the notice; and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach has,
pursuant to Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray
Beach, submitted to the City Commission a report of the costs incurred
in abating said nuisance (s) as aforesaid, said report indicating the
costs per parcel of land involved; and,
vlHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach,
pursuant to Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances desires to assess the
cost of said nuisance(s) against said property owner(s),
.
" '."
.
-- -~.- -- .
..----- -_.---_.. ~- -.----- --- ---.--- --- -----
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That assessments in the individual amounts as shown
by the report of the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach, involving
the City's cost of abating the aforesaid nuisances upon the lots or
parcels of land described in said report, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby levied against the parcells)
of land described in said report and in the amount(s) indicated thereon.
Said assessments so levied shall, if not paid within thirty (30) days
after mailing of the notice described in Sec. 3, become a lien upon the
respective lots and parcells) of land described in said report, of the
same nature and to the same extent as the lien for general city taxes
and shall be collectible in the same manner as mortgages and fore-
closures are under state law.
Section 2. That such assessments shall be legal, valid and
binding obligations upon the property against which said assessments are
levied.
Section 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach is
hereby directed to immediately mail by first class mail to the owner(s)
of the property, as such ownership appears upon the records of the
County Tax Assessor, notice(s) that the City Commission of the City of
Delray Beach on the has levied an
assessment against said property for the cost of abatement of said
nuisance by the City, and that said assessment is due and payable within
thirty (30) days after the mailing date of said notice of assessment,
after which a lien shall be placed on said property, and interest will
accrue at the rate of 8% per annum, plus reasonable attorney's fees and
other costs of collecting said sums. A Notice of Lien shall be mailed,
along with the Notice of Assessment and this resolution.
Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective thirty
(30) days from the date of adoption and the assessment (s) contained
herein shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing
date of the notice of said assessment(s), after which a lien shall be
placed on said property(s), and interest shall accrue at the rate of
eight (8) percent per annum plus, if collection proceedings are
necessary, the costs of such proceedings including a reasonable
attorney's fee.
Section 5. That in the event that payment has not been
received by the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the mailing
date of the notice of assessment, the City Clerk is hereby directed to
record a certified copy of this resolution in the public records of Palm
Beach County, Florida, and upon the date and time of recording of the
certified copy of this resolution a lien shall become effective on the
subject property which shall secure the cost of abatement, interest at
the rate of 8%, and collection costs including a reasonable attorney's
fee.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the day
of , 1992.
MAY 0 R
ATTEST:
City Clerk
- 2 - Res. No. 35-92
,
l' ,."
,
,.
.
COST OF ABATING NUISANCES UNDER CHAPTER 100
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OWNER ASSESSMENT
S50' OF N200' OF E135' OF BLK MINNIE NEWMAN $ 50.00
10, TOWN OF DELRAY, PB 1, P 3, 240 N.W. 8TH AVENUE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 2.45 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL $122.45
(NW 6TH AVENUE)
N 1/2 OF LOT 18 & LOT 19, ARTHUR J. TAYLOR $150.00
(LESS ST RD R/W) HOFMAN ADD., TILLIE M. TAYLOR TR 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PB 5, P 3, PUBLIC RECORDS, 700 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY 2.45 (RECORDING)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 $222.45
(700 NE 6TH AVENUE)
LOT 1, BLK 3, ATLANTIC PARK RIDLEY TEMPLE CHURCH OF $ 70.00
GARDENS, DELRAY, PB 14, P 56, GOD IN CHRIST OF AMERICA 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH P.O. BOX 958 2.45 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33447 $142.45
(SW 13TH AVENUE)
S150' OF W135.5' OF BLK 26, FRED MC COY $ 77.42
TOWN OF DELRAY, PB 5, P 64, 4950 N.W. 15TH COURT 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH MIAMI, FL 33142 2.45 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL $149.87
(415 NW 2ND STREET)
LOT 5, HIGH ACRES, PB 21, BLUE STAR BUILDERS INC. $ 22.00
P 85, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM 2044 N.W. 52ND STREET 70.00 (ADM. COST)
BEACH COUNTY, FL BOCA RATON, FL 33496 2.45 (RECORDING)
(109 NW 16TH STREET) $ 94.45
LOT 24, BLK 1, ROSEMONT PARK, NORMAN J. ALEXANDER & $172.00
DELRAY, PB 13, P 60, PUBLIC TAMMY E. ATWATER 70.00 (ADM. COST)
RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL 602 S.W. 4TH AVENUE 2.45 (RECORDING)
(602 SW 4TH AVENUE) DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 $244.45
LOT 36, BLK 32, TOWN OF DELRAY, S. & RONNA STUBBS $ 55.00
PB 6, P 97, PUBLIC RECORDS, 319 S.W. 5TH AVENUE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444- 2.45 (RECORDING)
(319 SW 5TH AVENUE) 2405 $127.45
-3- Res. No. 35-92
"
.
"
.
LOT 17, BLK 23, TOWN OF DELRAY, BERTHA PRESTON $ 50.00
PB 10, P 69, PUBLIC RECORDS, 1001 W. 3RD STREET 70.00 [ADM. COST~
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL RIVIERA BEACH, FL 33404 2.45 RECORDING
(SW 6TH AVENUE) $122.45
LOT 18, BLK 23, TOWN OF DELRAY, MATILDA JOHNSON $ 50.00
PB 10, P 69, PUBLIC RECORDS, 225 S.W. 6TH AVENUE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 2.45 (RECORDING)
(SW 6TH AVENUE) 2537 $122.45
S50' OF N200' OF W120' OF BLK EDWIN C. IVY $ 65.00
25, TOWN OF DELRAY, PB 5, P 2, 519 S.W. 15TH TERRACE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 2.45 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL 1445 $137.45
(NW 5TH AVENUE)
LOTS 1 & 2, PARADISE HEIGHTS, CHARLENE G. LOVETT $ 50.00
PB 24, P 113, PUBLIC RECORDS, 5805 OLD FORGE CIRCLE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL RALEIGH, NC 27609-4035 2.45 (RECORDING)
(NW 6TH AVENUE) $122.45
LOT 10, BLK 96, LINN'S ADD. TO DAVID & SHEILA J. ROMAN $ 24.00
OSCEOLA PARK, DELRAY, PB 1, 3 CATALINA COURT 15.00 (ADM. COST)
P 3, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM CENTEREACH, NY 11720 2.45 (RECORDING)
BEACH COUNTY, FL $ 41.45
(339 SE 3RD AVENUE)
LOTS 28 & 29, BLK 29, RESUB. CHARLIE TERRY $275.00
OF BLK. 29, DELRAY BEACH, 95 S.W. 5TH AVENUE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PB 9, P 66, PUBLIC RECORDS, DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 2.45 ( RECORDING)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL 2511 $347.45
(95 SW 5TH AVENUE)
LOTS 2 & 3, DELRAY BEACH RAPHAELLA S. TROYANOS $189.10
ESTATES, PB 21, P 13, PUBLIC GERASIMOS & 15.00 (ADM. COST)
RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL LUCIA TROIANOS 2.45 (RECORDING)
(NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY) 20003 POMPEII ROAD $206.55
HOLLISWOOD, NY 11423
LOT 5, BLK 7, OSCEOLA PARK, SCOTT & JANE E. LAYMAN $ 48.00
PB 3, P 2, PUBLIC RECORDS, WM & MARILYN HUTCHESON 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL 225 NE 25TH STREET 2.45 (RECORDING)
(618 SE 4TH AVENUE) BOCA RATON, FL 33431 $120.45
S60' OF N140' OF W140.6' OF LILLIAN MUNNINGS $ 40.00
BLK 56, TOWN OF DELRAY, PB 20, 303 SW 2ND AVENUE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
P 55, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 2.45 (RECORDING)
BEACH COUNTY, FL $112.45
(303 SW 2ND AVENUE)
-4- Res. No. 35-92
o. '.'0
..
S 1/2 OF LOT 7 & N38' OF LOT 8, WAYNE L. & IRENE A. $119.00
BLK 96, LINNS ADD. TO OSCEOLA EDRINGTON 70.00 (ADM. COST~
PARK, DELRAY, PB 1, P 133, 1710 N. E. 3RD COURT #3 2.45 (RECORDING
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33435 $191.45
COUNTY, FL
(327-329 SE 3RD AVENUE)
LOTS 1 & 2 (lESS RD R/W) , BLK L.C. PROP.OF DELRAY $ 61.00
11, OSCEOLA PARK, PB 3, P 2, BEACH INC. 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH 5730 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY 2.45 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL FT. LAUDERDALE , FL 33308 $133.45
(610 SE 6TH AVENUE)
LOTS 22 TO 26 INC., BLK 15, ALVAN E. MC FORD $ 69.55
TOWN OF DELRAY, PB 13, P 18, 17831 N. W. 47TH AVENUE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH CAROL CITY, FL 33055-3255 2.45 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL $142.00
(SW 7TH AVENUE)
LOTS 32 & 33, BLK 15, TOWN OF VERA F. GIBSON $ 65.00
DELRA Y , PB 13, P 18, PUBLIC P.O. BOX 66 70.00 (ADM. COST)
RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL INKSTER, MI 48141 2.45 (RECORDING)
(SW 6TH AVENUE) $137.45
LOTS 13 & 14, BLK 95, LINN'S STEPHEN CURIC $ 40.00
ADD TO OSCEOLA PARK, DELRAY, 1767 DREW ROAD 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PB 1, P 133, PUBLIC RECORDS, MISSISSAUGA 2.45 (RECORDING)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL ONTARIO, CANADA L5A 1J5 $112.45
(SE 4TH AVENUE)
S75' OF W135.6' OF BLK 39, LUCIUS SIMMONS $151.00
TOWN OF DELRAY, PB 11, P 34, 1301 KANAB AVE. NW 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH PALM BAY, FL 32907 2.45 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL $223.45
(315 SW 3RD STREET)
LOTS 14 & 15, BLK B, RIDGEWOOD CHRISTINE SAUVEUR $ 70.00
HEIGHTS, DELRAY, PB 14, P 4, 406 S. W. 9TH STREET 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444- 2.45 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL 2332 $142.45
(1023 SW 8TH AVENUE)
LOT 29, BLK 3, DELRAY SHORES, YVONNE RAMEAU $106.00
PB 24, P 233, PUBLIC RECORDS, 17225 S.W. 109TH COURT 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL MIAMI, FL 33157 2.45 (RECORDING)
(3425 DORSON WAY) $178.45
LOT 33, DELRAY BEACH ESTATES, ROSEKIN INC. $ 86.00
PB 21, P 13, PUBLIC RECORDS, 2519 N. FEDERAL HWY. 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 2.45 (RECORDING)
(2519 N FEDERAL HWY) $158.45
-5- Res. No. 35-92
" .",
/
"
WI00' OF LOT 92, TROPIC ISLE, PHILIP J. KNAPP $ 49.00
PB 24, P 235, PUBLIC RECORDS, 5391 N. NOB HILL ROAD 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL SUNRISE, FL 33351 2.45 (RECORDING)
(965 BOLENDER DRIVE) $121.45
LOT 24,BLK A, WEST SIDE DURANTE-STROCK INC. $ 40.00
HEIGHTS, DELRAY, PB 13, P 61, 2160 W.ATLANTIC AVE.#100 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FL 33445 2.45 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL $112.45
(NW 9TH AVENUE)
LOTS 7 TO 12 INC. & W 1/2 OF ROY D & CECILIA A JEWELL $130.00
16' ABNDED ALLEY LYG E OF & 1402 N. FEDERAL HWY. 70.00 (ADM. COST)
ADJ THERETO BLK At LA HACIENDA, DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483- 2.45 (RECORDING)
DELRAY, PB 15, P 6, PUBLIC 5922 $202.45
RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL
(1400 N FEDERAL HWY)
TH PT OF LOT 11 K/A W 1/2 OF ELIJAH THOMPSON $ 58.00
DUPLEX/BLK 4, PRIEST'S ADD TO 241 S.W. 14TH AVENUE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
ATLANTIC PARK GARDENS, PB 23, DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 2,45 (RECORDING)
P 70, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM $130.45
BEACH COUNTY, FL
(241 SW 14TH AVENUE)
S40' OF N256' OF E135' OF BLK DELORES RIGGINS $ 65.00
31, TOWN OF DELRAY, PB 1, P 3, 6395 SEMINOLE CIRCLE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH LANTANA, FL 33462 2.45 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL $137.45
(220 SW 4TH AVENUE)
S50' OF N300' OF E135' OF N 1/2 o. C. STRACHAN $ 50.00
OF BLK 31, TOWN OF DELRAY, C/O R. STRACHAN 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PB 1, P 3, PUBLIC RECORDS, 8841 N.W. 14TH AVENUE 2.45 (RECORDING)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL MIAMI, FL 33147 $122.45
(222 SW 4TH AVENUE)
N 1/2 OF E 1/2 OF LOT 16, BLK FELIX J. DELANCY $ 40.00
30, TOWN OF DELRAY, PB 1, P 3, 470 DEKALB AVENUE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH BROOKLYN, NY 11205-4448 2.45 (RECORDING)
COUNTY, FL $112.45
(146 SW 4TH AVENUE)
LOT 19, BLK 2, ATLANTIC PARK J. D. & EARLINE MONROE $ 70.00
GARDENS, PB 14, P 56, PUBLIC 32 EARLE STREET 70.00 (ADM. COST)
RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL HARTFORD, CT 06120 2.45 (RECORDING)
(39 SW 13TH AVENUE) $142.45
-6- Res. No. 35-92
.. ,-"
..
. , .
S150' OF E50' OF BLK 18, TOWN H. & HAZEL CLEM $ 50.00
OF DELRAY, PB 1, P 3, PUBLIC 3 SUMMER STREET 70.00 lADM. COST~
RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL NORWALK, CT 06851-4503 2.45 RECORDING
(NW 2ND STREET) $122.45
LOT 10, BLK 25, TOWN OF DELRAY, DAVID HARGROVE $ 50.00
PB 5, P 2, PUBLIC RECORDS, 220 N.W. 4TH AVENUE 70.00 (ADM. COST)
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 2.45 (RECORDING)
(419 NW 3RD STREET) 33441-1727 $122.45
S5' OF LOT 1 & N71.5' OF LOT 2, SYLVIA SCHUPLER TR. $ 50.00
BLK 30, TOWN OF DELRAY, PB 1, 3101 WASHINGTON ROAD 70.00 (ADM. COST)
P 3, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM W. PALM BEACH, FL 33405- 2.45 (RECORDING)
BEACH COUNTY, FL 1644 $122.45
(109 SW 5TH AVENUE)
E50' OF W1751 OF N160' OF BEATRICE GRAHAM $ 35.00
W 1/2 OF S 1/2 OF LOT 5, SUB BOBBY L. GRAHAM 70.00 (ADM. COST)
OF SEC. 8-46-43, PUBLIC 721 N.W. 4TH STREET 2.45 (RECORDING)
RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444- $107.45
(714 LAKE IDA ROAD) 2736
VIOLATION IS: SEC. 100.01 LAND TO BE KEPT FREE OF DEBRIS, VEGETATION,
MATTER CONSTITUTING HAZARDS; DECLARED NUISANCE.
.....7- Re s. No. 3 5 - 9 2
,. ,.;,
.
..
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i "I .:J:, - MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1992
AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS
DATE: April 10, 1992
This item is before you to approve the award of the following bids
and contracts:
1. 1992 Street Resurfacing Program - Hardrives Asphalt Co. , in
the amount of $188,184 with funding from General Construction
Fund - Resurfacing (334-3162-541-60.53) .
2. Gymnasium Floor Replacement - Community Center - Camaio
Surfaces, Inc. (via Palm Beach County School Board contract) -
in the amount of $41,230 with funding from Decade of
Excellence Bond Issue (Account No. 225-4125-572-61.57) .
3. Site Plan Preparation - Leon Weekes Preserve - Florida
Atlantic University in the amount of $15,000 with funding from
Recreation Impact Fee Fund (Account No. 117-4169-572-33.19).
4 . Housing Rehabilitation - as indicated below - with funding
from Community Development Block Grant - Housing Rehabilitation
(Account No. 118-1963- 554-60.23):
-913 S.W. 4th Avenue - Henry Haywood - $14,341.95
-304 S.W. 11th Avenue - Henry Haywood - $14,290.50
-605 S.E. 2nd Avenue - MJD Construction Services-
$14,282.10.
5. One ( 1 ) 3-Stage Air-Scrubbers - Environmental Services -
Davis Process (sole source) in the amount of $39,500, plus
$6,000 for maintenance with funding from 1984 Water and Sewer
Bond - 3 Stage Poly Air Scrubber (441-5162-536-61.16).
6. Alley Reconstruction Project - Environmental Services - Jack
Hardy, Inc. in the amount of $483,771 with funding from Decade
of Excellence Bond Issue Alley Reconstruction (Account No.
225-3162-541-61.43/$366,557.50), Water and Sewer - Renewal and
Replacement/Water Meter Replacement Program (Account No.
442-5178-536-61.81/$93,454) and Community Redevelopment Agency
Reimbursement ($23,000).
7. Irrigation - Gulfstream Boulevard Beautification - Windmill
Sprinkler Company in the amount of $13,472.50 with funding from
1987 Utility Tax - Gulfstream Boulevard (Account No.
333-4141-572-61.38).
Recommend approval of the award of the above bids and contracts with
funding as indicated.
OJ ldl
.
.
. .
Agenda Item No.:
AGENDA REOUEST
Date: March 26. 1992
Request to be placed on:
~ Regular Agenda
_____ Special Agenda
_____ Workshop Agenda When: April 14. 1992
Description of item (who, what, where, how much) : Staff request award of the
1992 Street Resurfacing Contract to Hardrives Asphalt Co. for $ 188.184.00.
Funding source 334-3162-541-60.53. Proiect # 92-01.
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval.
Department Head Signature: \~~ 3);)...~/'2-
,
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) ,
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds):
Funding available: YES/NO
Funding alternatives (if applicable)
Account No. & Description ~ f1 (ft' <': \ ~H I~(~' - k"'r ~ \,I,kA<' (' !~;N;;'
Account Balance 1; :9 1\'6, '6 ; D I '--'
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: t5YNO fYJ-1
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
:..
.
I
.
. -10j)u ~~
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RECEIVED
MEMORANDUM MAR 2 7 '1992
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN
CITY MANAGER
FROM: RALPH E. HAYDEN, P.E. ~
CITY ENGINEER
DATE: MARCH 26, 1992
SUBJECT: 1992 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Enclosed is an agenda request and bid tabulation for the 1992
street Resurfacing Program. Please place this on the April 14th,
1992 commission Agenda. We recommend award of this contract to
Hardrives Asphalt Co, the lowest responsible responsive bidder in
the amount of $ 188,184.00.
REH:kt
Encl.
File: Memos to David T. Harden, City Manager
RHDH326.kt
I""
.
t - I -.., '") '3 .1
F.,J ::i '. !..: v :. }-,
~~i",lf S qt\M
~ "\ ~ ~' rMnL;
"
;-:RT 9.:2. - 001 /9'12 ..5''772('f7P''- fi?ff-5(/.eP/-JC//v'6'-, .;P,co::p..,e/9/VJ
..._H......'... fl/JRD/?/I/B'5 0..... lIex cot?"> J/VL.~1:3'I<.tBY CO/>-1/i'7t1N/7,Y
m. ..., .." ::'~.~.. r r,' . < r, /J 5 ,PJ/ /) 1'1 /t.s/'N /) L r
MO, lacun'" '*1' QUlMTJn PIllel C1""""'TIU
"'I:-tl.iiiii..__."~-----,.,.__..__._. .--.- C" .. ;..--;:;- --- ~ .. -- --
, n/6.,f 3 " ~7 -32 1:::> 33~
I :;::.:~I~' I~:::~::. .____._.____-? __'==._ .___._____:.._..~ ~ _-:...": ~.::::-
INWlut. ,..Unt
....... ....", / /' 1 i C1 - / 7,' ? -? L ,- 73 /I /' li - 7 4 () I --
...,,,,.. 'OA' _. '.'" '_'_ /<.? '. .:J . ~_.::?~ __~_--::::.....L.~<F..[__ _ /. LJ----l-{)j!"-'.
...lIu.
c._u
. w,... .."01.. '15'- / .2 5 ,- J / () .- / / ty-
....nnoh It...... ._._____.____L. ~-"--- -.---- .-- -.---.--.-..
Goltlr. U ,&'Ill, ,
:~::,:':.;::.., .. ... _' _ .3 80D ,- _2.JJCJ..P~ ____"3 -1 t~tJ__=_., 4.L1...t!.o r'
DOHan
..... .2 50'- " ,___3,~O .=, _.______...../-t7-.~" _______~ SX/~
) ad../nMlU' 7-'- .2 , -
..l.tb, hhC C ,- l J .. .-
,n'.. t. ,n'" 11 "'_'_ _7 00 () (I CJ 0 <1 Lj c' _5'. O{){)
- ,
...
~I~ ~
C.nU.
4 ~t::'.::I::';:... ____. ____~_5.~ 35 - __________(;J!:?~-- '-.__~(}~'~
:::":.r.:t::~Y' ..... _ . _ .:? .5 {J- 350 -- c:,.5 () ,- 5 00 ~
...lIn
~". .
so 95 So '-
· ..un....III.&I'" / ...- ..;;Z- 4 -~ ~
.,,..'u ""'I..nt ----- _.. __ .
;~:;'::':..... .. I,... '_'_ ..(, 7otJ.~ 5,3/0'- &, /tJi) .- -3'-6, CJO'-
M.ur.
c.."
b'al .nl",
I.' JlI.. a'......... . (1. ___.... .
~l ~6 0
. .. wI" ,.n_ /1 ~ 0 ._ /1 4-(.; () .:< J
"...,1", l.,' ____.____.__.___. _ .'._ _ ____._____ _.(~_f_ - __ _ __ _ ,-
~~:: ......... .. ...... _ . _ / c,;( 0 ,- /.<::; (;; 0 ,- .:? '71,:d)'- --- X7 At) .-
".'11"
c..,. B
, :;.~:::.~... __ ___,_ 0.. :3..:- " ,______. o. ~ . ,_ n'n 0, 1fi-__,.__ _._ tJ. .;2.9
.".. ... n.... 1 ".a. - '7 () Q ~ "'? /; a, - -? 3 ,) -
''''1 L'''I f_l_ ~ A. I ~ CJ .::> U"'.Jj'"> ...<.. ^
DelUlr.
..... 5'''1 /: {;:Z ? :l ~l-
· .. wi', ...... O. :;-- <.-J, -=-- {/, - tJ. -
lul,.", - -.-"..----- -.-.-- ._-. ._-.-.
~~:~ ... u.... .. .ID . _ . _ .2 I (; - :J. 0& - 3 Cd> 8 -' .2 ;2 .6 ,-
..;.u....
..... .::5 It> , 0:<' 30
/ . /_~ 1- / _
. I._ "'... '*lll. . _. ....( I _ . _J
.tJ'I,I", .. .'_ _ .. _ .__U" "-
..... ... u.... 5' 00 Lf '7.J.. c2 0 tJ. c;- -, (J ,-
'''Ill II ".. '_'_ CJ (,...... ........, V'<
..11....
" ;;;:;1:: ..It. _~~____ j..~ / Sl'.,{.ti I . ,______._/, B
..,..... u.... / 0. ~tJ'- / 1 CI.4 - -< r--.a a --I / 9A /1 -
,..tI t, 1,1Oe . _ , _ / 0 I .:"} C:.J r -.J. -":J c/ U / 17
I
Dol lire
c.... Lt!.O ~ 7'S- /.:z .-; - /05 -
&1 ...Ilr..' .....,. ---- ..- ..----- .--- .-.--- -..--------~---- --~.- -~--.-..-. --_.~ .-.-
..,.. ... /. t:J /l - ,.-- -0 - ,"'7. ./ " - /' -, -
__U,I. U. '_1_ (.s? V .? 'rl ,W~# CC-,O
Dlunn
I:..C.
II ._, .......?<C ________, 8 G' - ,,__._,____// .5 - ___ 93 -
::::,::. .... _ . _ S -4 () -- 5/ () - ~ <J {J .- ------:?53.;:.:
........
!:e.'.
U :!~i::?:nov ____n~.~~~- ______ ~l__=_ _______~_2_=-__ _~_.__..__~3!i--
:::::,.::' ... '_'_ /7S''- / (;;tJ - 3-1-5- /75-
Nlur.
e..l.
U :r::~:I::.:n_ ~.__.________cP~-: _.___._.._ __4._~~ __n___._____-"____/ 38_'_.~ _ _~___.__.Z(J.~:_
_rki"9l 5'- - ,/ . - --
........ ........ .. . '_'_ :3.2 _::?:2 b wC) t:J "'350 '
"'111'.
1:..&.
7--5" - '7- S - 7- - , -
11 1000LV. 'lrMtl_ .._ _________L....:::.___ _L........___... .. 8 .____ . _. 8;2.
::::~:, ..,....' .. . . _ . _ / .5' G,i ,- / 5If-- n. - ---j 74'- -._------/(;,~ ':;
..1..1'.
I:."'U 30:z0
11 :~~::t=l 3 -- __.~,,~_..,_ 3.- _____..______.:_..____,__-1~_~ _ _ 3.?l}
:::::o~:.:~:::. IA "0 , _ , _ /3.2 - / .2 8 .- / ~ 5~ .-.- - / 4 t'J .-
Delli...
e.M. 3(t.:l0 1+
,n :t~~:l:~;l _______.~5..~~ __~, ~- 1. -- 3.;?:!!.
::::~::...::::::. ~ uo '_'_ I 15S~- /. ;~-;;-~ -.--------->~..-~1.9- --_. /} :1~5-
DoII.r.
RIlle
"&1' "V"'IIC ,.an ,,,.
lUll Alhr..t.t 11. Ill.. . - n ,
........
C..~O
'1 ......1I1..U_ -_
....._ .',... .. . ........ .' ....... / (,} / C.J / t?'- ) tI
et.....
..
.....
II "'oUnt 1oI~ "U_a_. c::::;:J ;--.- ~ - ~ 0 -
....... ._ ..,... .. . . ...... I w.u t!:J.:::J () __lJ ""~?.!?__ ___. Z' 5"0 - () _r:; 0
.1...., ...._... rlr.,.;
Dolhrl
.l.ht .......... tlltv
Clnll ~
:::':t:::':-:::.~:" "........., . / ,823 /84 --- /9.8 (J(,5- ;Z D:< 5',8'&;:";' / if 7 /66-
T.~" 1.,.&MIl.' I.'
.lId U... 1 tI"'.\l'lh U fin vor'"
OIlhr.
e."1;.
,j
- , . .
""'f) w ~~
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN RECEIVED
CITY MANAGER
~( APR ~ 19'Jl
FROM: ROBERT B. TAYLOR, P.E.
ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER CITY MANAr,FR'S OFFICE
DATE: APRIL 1, 1992
SUBJECT: STREET RESURFACING CONTRACT 1991-92
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The following streets are scheduled to be resurfaced under
the 1991-92 street resurfacing contract.
Homewood Blvd (Lowson to Atlantic)
s. W. 13th street (Pines of Delray West)
s. W. 15th street (Pines of Delray West)
s. W. 27th Avenue (Pines of Delray West)
Del Aire Blvd (Pines of Delray)
N.W. 1st Avenue (N. W. 2nd st. to N. W. 3rd st.)
N.W. 24th street (Swinton to West end)
Lake Drive (Section south of N. W. 22nd st.)
N.W. 17th Street (N. W. 2nd Ave. to Lake Dr.)
N.E. 6th Street (Swinton to N. E. 2nd Avenue)
N.E. lOth Street (Swinton to N. E. 2nd Avenue)
Kings Lynn (Aylesbury Road to Enfield Road)
Periwinkle Lane (N. W. 11th st. to North end)
s. W. 21st Avenue (S.W. 13th st. to S. W. 13 th ct.)
S.W. 13th Court (S. W. 21st Way to S. W. 2 1 Ave.)
S.W. 21st Terrace (S. W. 13th ct. to South end)
S. W. 21st Way (S. W. 14th st. to s. W. 13 th ct.)
In our estimation the cost associated with resurfacing these
streets represents about 50-60% of the total contract
amount.
RT:kt
File: Memos to David T. Harden, city Manager
RTDH41.kt
,..
"
,
Agenda I tern No, :
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: March 31. 1992
Request to be placed on;'
XX Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda
When: April 14. 1992
Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much): Contract Award -
Community Center Gym Floor Replacement.
ORDIHAHCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO
Recommendation: Award to Camaio Surfaces, Inc., at a cost of $41,230., via
The School Board of Palm Beach County Contract #SB-92C-72T.
~ .1' >>(Afr) /
~ /
I I
Department Head Signature:
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all iteas involving expenditure
of funds):
Funding available: ~ NO
Funding alternatives: (if applicable)
~ccount No. & DesW,Ptio~ u~"4/7.-S~S7'2-.lO(-.S7 CO}1J.1J. ~tJree.-puoes;
ccount Balance: ~(), UGWT5jz- TtAlN1S a:.
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: ~ NO ov1
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action: Approved/Disapproved
,-,'.
"
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
THROUGH: Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager/
~ Administrative Services
FROM: Ted Glas, Purchasing Officer '~~
DATE: March 31, 1992
SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING -
APRIL 14, 1992 - CONTRACT AWARD -
COMMUNITY CENTER GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT
Item Before City Commission:
The City Commission is requested to award a contract to Camaio
Surfaces, Inc., at a cost of $41,230. Per the Finance Department,
funding is from: (
) .
Background:
Funds are allocated in the Decade of Excellence Bond monies to install
a new gym floor. A total of $ is budgeted for this
work.
Gymnasium floor installation is available via The School Board of Palm
Beach County Contract #SB-92C-72T, per attached documentation.
The Director of Parks & Recreation has reviewed this contract, and
recommends award, per attached memo.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends award to Camaio Surfaces, Inc., at a cost of $41,230.
via The School Board of Palm Beach County Contract. Funding as
outlined above.
Attachments:
Documentation on School Board Contract
Memo from Parks & Recreation
pc: Joe Weldon
10;. ".11
,.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ted Glas Purchasing Director
FROM: Joe Weldon Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY CENTER GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT
DATE: March 19, 1992
Attached please find a contract from Palm Beach County School Board with
Camaio Surfaces for the repair/refinishing of gym floors. This contract
also provides for the replacement of gym floors. Also attached is a
quote from Camaio Surfaces to replace our Community Center gym floor.
The replacement surface would be standard (second or better grade) which
are typically used for gym floors. The difference between competition
(first grade) and standard (second grade) is one of appearance only.
(see attached) I have highlighted the items in the letter which are
covered by the School Board contract. The contract amount would be
$41,230 since the removal and replacement of the bleachers would be done
by the company refinishing the bleachers. $28,210 of the contract
amount is covered by items bid in the School Board Agreement and $13,020
is not covered by the contract and is for labor to remove the
sUb-flooring, sub-flooring materials, sUb-flooring installation, and
vent cove base. Camaio Surfaces indicated because they cannot rip up
the floor to inspect the sUb-flooring, the material and labor cost to
replace the sUb-flooring is based on 100% replacement. Typically this
is not the case with 50% replacement more likely, which may reduce those
costs by about one half.
This figure is close to other estimates we received that arranged from
$5.50 (lowest quality) to $7.50 (highest quality) per square foot for
gym flooring. Based on 6200 sq ft this ranged from $37,100 to $46,500.
Camaio floors indicated that they could replace the flooring around
June/July and it would require about 4-6 weeks to complete. The
refinishing and repair of the bleachers and the new gym lighting will be
coordinated with this project.
If you are in agreement please place this on the April 7 Agenda for City
Commission consideration. This is a Decade of Excellence Bond project
charged to account # 225-4125-572-t1.67.
(
I,
and Recreation
cc: David Harden City Manager
REF: TGLAS3.DOC
".
.
.
CAMAIO -
....... -.".
~M .. ~'.. -". - .... U_"._.
-
.'--~ ~.,-- - .' FROM: (,fGttJ ;t7 tit f Q OATE: .~ j '1/1'
PAGB INQ.UOING
~~9 ~- ~ THIS PAGE:
FAX': PHON:;.; 72"IJ-/~R?- ~
-
.
March 4, 1992
The city of Deln~y Beach
.50 N.W. 1st Avenue
Delray .Beach, FL 3.3444
Attention: Mr. Joe Heldon
RE: Gymnasium Floor @ community Center
Gentlemen:
Following, please find our Uni,t Prices for wood Flooring for the
above referenced project as per your ~equest. All Unit Prices
furnished below are based on 6,200 Sq. Ft.
Remove existing flooring @ .48/SF $ 2- '; 9-'''.. 0'0
Remove existing sub-flooring @ .48/SF 2,976.00
Remove & Replace bleachers @ .38/SF 2-,3SG.OO . _.......__...~~4
Sub-flooring material @ .82/SF 5,084.00
Sub-flooring installation @ .36/:: 2,232.00
Maple flooring @ 2.47/SF li'f*' J ~
Installation of Maple @ .42/SF 2'~' iii' ('&0
Floor prep(sanding) @ .29/SF 1 ,~9&.60
Markings less than 3" (gamelines) @ .12/SF 1~
Finish Coats (4 total material) @ .32/SF lAI.~
Finish Coats (4 total Labor) @ .45/SF ~""'.:,.'\J (I
Vent Cove Base (material & labor) @ .44/SF 2,728.uO
TOTAL: ~$4J,S86.6~
4 I .J. 3 ()
If you have any questions, or we can be of further assist~nce,
please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Sincerely,
CAMAIO SURFACES, INC.
4~/ -~~
_.' < " ,
. -- ," ,.....-G- ~r:,.~
~ ' .
Fred H. Maio
FM/bjc ,
7542 W. MCNAB ROAD . SUITE [l-g . NORTH LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33068 . (305) 720-1 582
I",
.
09550/MAP
APPLICATION GUIDE Buyline 3238
i
:.c~~~'%;;;-;;,.;.,.,- ~ ~,(.
----- ~ _.."~_.',,"",-_._--_._--
! ''''"'-~- - - ...~_.... ~ -
Ii - ,~."~,, --,
, --.. ~ l~-- l..... ":~~." _ .... ," . .-- .
. . ~~
1-----~"~~=".~2{ ~-- .~~~~::~~~ ~~~
~'.<r~...~..- ~i::.
COMPETITION (First Grade) STANDARD MULTIPURPOSE (Third Gradel
I The highest standard grade, An (Second and Better Grade) Third Grade gives excellent perform-
I extremely durable and desirable floor for This grade will provide same long life ance for roller rinks, factories, ware,
any building; particularly suitable for fine and low maintenance performance as houses and kindred uses where good
homes, apartments, churches, clubs, First Grade, Second And Better Grade is wearing qualities are required together
dance floors, gymnasiums, handball and an ideal choice for gymnasiums, hand- with medium cost and appearance.
racquetball courts, school classrooms, ball and racquetball courts, multipur- Industry Standards:
hospitals, hotels, offices and other pose rooms, cafeterias and shops in .25/32" and 3:Y32" thick
applications where fine appearance and schools, industrial plants, offices, com- . Strip lengths 1% to 8 it as stock will
long wear are desired. mercial buildings and residences, and is produce; not more than 75% of total
Industry Standards: the most frequently used. footage will be in bundles under 4 It:
. 25132" and 3:Y32" thick Industry Standards: and not more than 45% will be in 1 V4 It
. Face practically defect free . 25/32" and 3:Y32" thick bundles,
. Strip lengths 1V4 to 8 ft, as stock will . ~dmits tight knots and slight imperfec- Third and Better Grade (Multipurpose
produce; not more than 45% of total tlons Plus) is also available; consult MFMA
footage will be in bundles under 4 ft; . Strip lengths 1V4 to 8 It as stock will Grading Rules for specifications.
not more than 25% will be in 2 ft bun- produce; not more than 55% of total
dies, and not more than 5% will be in footage will be in bundles under 4 ft;
1% ft bundles. not more than 27% will be in 2 ft bun-
dles, and not more than 10% will be in
I. 1Y4 ft bundles.
MFMA GRADING RULES Complete Grading Rules are published by MFMA for reference by
I architects and specifiers. Ask your MFMA Associate for a copy, or contact MFMA direct
FREE TECHNICAL DATA CONSULT THESE MFMA MANUFACTURERS
MFMA offers a library of information
on the manufacture, installation and MANUFACTURER Robbins, Inc. C & A Products.lnc,
I maintenance of MFMA maple flooring MEMBERS 4777 Easlern Avenue 125 Ma,n A,enue ._
. Clnclnoall, OH 45226 ElmwOOd Park ~J 07cu,
Publications are provided to archi- Action Floor Systems, Inc. ~1~8~;ft~'7998 201. 791.6700 ,
tects and other specifiers free of pC! Box 469 (MllIs.Wh,te Lake WI and Crawford Laboralorles
Mercer, WI 54547 Ish Mil ' 4165 Soulh Emerald A,enue
charge' 715/476,3512 pemrng. . Chicago, IL 60609
. FAX 715/476,3585 Refer 10 Sweets #09550/ROC 312'376,7132
Maple Flooring' The Prefe"ed (Mill-Mercer, WI) Superior Floor Co,. Inc. 800:356.7625
S Sit' Reter 10 Sweel S #09550iACT ~a3u~:~fe~~~4~'3iel Dura Seal Division
ports u ace AGA C r 715:842.5358 Mlnwax Company I"c
, _ orpors Ion _ 15 Mercedes Drive
Sports Surface Life Cycle (A Divrslon of CFI) FAX 715/848,1793 Monlvale, NJ 07645
C SAGA Markelrng D,V,Sion (MIII.Laona, WI) 201391 0253
ost tudy PO 80x 246 Reier 10 Sweet's #09550/SUP 800'/526'.0495
I 'd' Amasa, MI 49903 Tarkell
nCI ence of InjUry Study: Maple 9061822.7311 Hardwood Dlvrslon-NMh Amerrca Hillyard, Inc.
FI' S' FAX, 9061822.7800 PO Box 300 302 Nor'" Foun" S:I.,,'
oorlng vs. ynthetlc (CA Office 213:859,0615) Johnson C,ly. TN 37605 SI ~oseph MO 645CI
Spec-Data (in CSt format) Refer 10 Sweet's #09550/AGA 615'928.3122 816,233.1321,
Connor Markel n D on FAX 615"l28,9445 Huntington Laboralorles, Ine,
MFMA Game Markings Manual 2305 BeRlne ~o gd SIS; 210 (MIII.Johnson Crly, TN) 970 Easl Tlplon SI
. . CarrOllton,1 TX 75~ UI e ReIer to Sweet s #09550fTAA Huntington IN 46750
RecommendatIons for Sanding, 8OO~972.'082 ALLIED ~~/~~~~~~~85
Sealing, Court Lining and ~~';r~~4~~~~;09550'CON MANUFACTURERS Magee ;ndu~lrie. Oiv.
Finishing (MIII.Amasa, MI) Basic Coatings Midland Ch'cago COIG
2124 Valley Orr...., (50321) 5300 W 1271h s,
MFMA Floor Finish List Horner Flooring Co. PO Box 677 AlSip IL 60658
. PO Box 380 Des Mo,nes, IA 50303 312'785.2407
Caring for your MFMA Maple Floor Dollar Bay, MI 49922 515'288,0231 Nationaf Coati~s Company
(Wall Chart) mI4~~~~'6115 ~8~~'?:S~ ~~r~~~'Place ~;~s~~~:;;,on2H ?~~j"6
(MIII.Dollar Bay, MI) Aurora. CO 80011.1207 501985.1172
@ COPYflght 1990, Maple Flooring Manufacturers Refer 10 Sweels #09550'HOR 303'371,1411 800.421.7319
Association; all rights reserved
,..
.
AGENDA ITEM 11-F
INVITATION NO. SB 92C-72T
DATE: October 4, 1991
DATE SOLICITED: August 20, 1991
DATE OPENED: September 18, 1991
DATE POSTED: October 14, 1991
PRESENTED TO BOARD: November 6, 1991
PROJECT: TERM CONTRACT TO REPAIR/REFINISH GYMNASIUM AND HARDWOOD FLOORS
(Repair/Refinish Gymnasium and Hardwood Floors)
CONTRACT PERIOD: November 7, 1991, through November 6, 1992
FUNCTION: 7904 OBJECT: 3520 lo'UND: 0100 ESTIMATED TOTAL $20,000
REQUESTED BY: Director of Maintenance and Renovations
22 Bids Solicited, 6 Responses (4 Bids, 2 No Bids) 16 No Response
VENDOR TERMS DELIVERY ITEM 1
ACOUSTI ENGINEERING CO. Net 30 15 days 3.25 sq. ft.
CAMAIO SURFACES, INC. Net 5 days 2.47 sq. ft.
SOFT-LITE FLOORS, INC. Net 21 days 6.20 sq. ft.
UNITED MILLWORK INC. Net - - - 4.80 sq. ft.
LEGEND:
= Award
(_) = Reject
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend award be made to the lowest and best bidder meeting
specifications, terms and conditions.
Respectfully submitted,
C. Monica Uhlhorn
Superintendent of Schools
Recommended by:
Henry R. Boekho~
Betty J. Helse~ Contact Person)
Don Chenicek ~
Terry L. Rhea~
Failure to fi~~ protest within the 'time prescribed in s. 120.53{S)" Florida
Statutes, shall constitute a waiver of proceedings under Chapter 120, Florida
Statutes.
h',
"
INVITATION NO. SB 92C-72T .,
SPECIAL CONDITIONS j(C/
A. SCOPE: The purpose and intent of this invitation to bid is to secure firm
prices and establish a term contract for REPAIR AND/OR REFINISH GYMNASIUM AND
OTHER HARDWOOD FLOORS, as specified herein, at various schools located through-
out Palm Beach County.
B. DELIVERY: Prices quoted in this invitation to bid shall be FOB destination
as set forth on individual purchase orders.
C. TERM OF CONTRACT : The term of this contract shall be during the period
November 7, 1991, through November 6, 1992, with the option to renew annually
for a period of two (2) additional years.
Annual renewal acceptance will be based on the successful vendor outlining in
detail their renewal intentions and maintaining all price and any special
conditions for the forthcoming year no later than September 1 in each contract
year and acceptance of same by the School Board. All prices shall remain firm
for the duration of this contract.
D. AWARD: Items in groups as marked, will be awarded by group. Therefore, it is
~sary for a bidder to bid on every item in the particular group in which
the bidder submits a bid in order to have a bid considered. It is also
required that the bidder carefully consider each item, and make sure that each
one meets the specifications as indicated. In the event that one item does
not meet such specifications the entire group bid will be disqualified.
It is anticipated that this bid will be awarded at the November 6, 1991, board
meeting.
E. QUALIFICATION: Each bidder MUST submit with their bid or within three days
of request a listing of similar completed projects. Failure to submit listing
will.be grounds for rejection of bid.
F. PRICES: Prices shall include all costs incurred in the delivery to and off-
loading of materials at site indicated.
Prices quoted for removal, installation and/or refinishing of floor shall
include ALL costs involved, including any and all materials, equipment and
labor utilized.
G. CATALOG CUTS: Bidders MUST submit with their bid catalog cuts, specification
sheets, technical data and any other pertinent information on the products/
materials they intend to use in the fulfillment of this contract. Failure of
the bidder to submit the above information with their bid or within three days
of request may be grounds for rejection of their bid.
H. INSURANCE: See attached sheet for insurance requirements. The School Board
of Palm Beach County must be named as an additional insured on policy.
Purchase orders will not be released until the certificate of insurance is
received in the Purchasing Department.
.-.-.
ALL NUMBERED PAGES MUST BE RETURNED FOR BID TO BE CONSIDERED.
3 of 11
".
"
INVITA'rION NO. SB 92C-72T
I. SCOPE OF WORK: The Contractor shall furnish at their expense all supervisors.
equipment, tools, materials, labor, transportation and other facilities and
services necessary to properly perform work specified.
The Contractor shall be responsible to ensure that all refuse, rubbish, scrap
materials and debris caused by their operations are cleaned up so that work
site presents a neat and orderly appearance at all times. Contractor shall
retain all product containers at job site until finished proj ect has been
accepted. At completion of work at each site, the Contractor shall remove
all waste materials, tools, equipment and surplus materials from the work site
and leave finished installation ready for use.
Safeguarding of all equipment, tools, materials, etc., at the work site shall
be the Contractor's responsibility.
Contractor shall repair/replace at no cost to the School Board, any and all
damage due to their operations. This shall include any and all damage to
walls, doors, door frames, fixtures and furniture.
The Contractor shall re-execute any and all work that fails to conform to the
requirements of this invitation to bid and that appears during the progress
of the work. Contractor shall further remedy any defects due to faulty
materials or workmanship which appear within a period of one (1) year from
date installation is accepted.
J. PROCEDURE: Subsequent to award, the following procedure will be followed:
l. When need for removal, repair, installation and/or refinishing of hardwood
floors arises, the Department of Facility Operations will notify Contractor
of need. Notification will include the name and address of school, name
and telephone number of person to be contacted, area(s) of school involved
and what work is desired to be performed (Le. removal/repair only,
installation only, refinish only, etc.).
2. After receipt of notification, Contractor shall, within two (2) working
days, contact designated person and make appointment to visit site to take
necessary measurements and ascertain work to be performed. After purchase
order has been issued, NO extra charge or compensation will be allowed as
a result of differences between actual amount of materials (including
lossage) required and measurements used to order materials.
3. Contractor shall, within five (5) working days after making site inspec-
tion, submit a written proposal in duplicate to the contact person.
a. Proposal shall indicate work Contractor recommends as being required.
Proposal shall indicate dimensions of area{s) involved, the amount
and type of material to be utilized (including the manufacturer's name
and number), cost of each item, any additional work or changes in-
volved, days after receipt of purchase order required to complete job.
Cost of materials and additional charges shall be based on prices
submitted in response to this invitation to bid. Any replacement of
special characters, school insignia, etc., should be determined at work
site and included in proposal. In the event the school desires to do
their own special painting, the contractor shall supply all ~aterials
ALL NUMBERED ?AGES HUS'r..BE RE'l'URNED FOR BID TO BE OJNSIDERED.
4 of 11
, .
'.
t....:'-';;:~-'-C: :..~C;~':)
INVITATION NO. SB 92C-72T
and application directions. School personnel performing this service
shall not effect warranty of work.
b. Contact person shall review all proposals. If found acceptable,
contact person shall either authorize contractor to proceed (in the
event a blanket purchase order has been issued) to perform recommended
work or submit a purchase requisition (Form PBSB 0239) to the Purchas-
ing Department. Upon receipt of requisition, the Purchasing Depart-
ment will issue a purchase order to the contractor.
4. Upon receipt of authorization to perform work or purchase order (whichever
is applicable, Contractor may proceed with ordering required materials.
Once contractor knows date work can commence, contractor shall contact
designated person and establish a definite commencement date. Upon
completion of required work, the Contractor shall contact designated person
and request inspection of finished project.
K. TIME OF COMPLETION: Time of completion of the work shall be as set forth on
the individual purchase order. The time allotted for completion on a purchase
order be the time frame mutually agreed upon by the contractor and the Depart-
ment of Maintenance and Renovations, but no less than ten (10) working days
to substantial completion and five (S) working days to final completion, unless
waived by the owner. Time frame shall be determined by owner's requirements
and needs in conjunction with contractor's site inspection for the purpose of
estimating work and determining extent of work to be accomplished.
L. DELAYS AND EXTENSIONS OF TIME: If Contractor for any cause or reason which
is beyond their control, 'is delayed in meeting completion date, date shall be
extended by mutual agreement between the Contractor and the School Board
(contact person).
M. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: Should the Contractor fail to complete the work within
the time specified on the purchase order, and provided the vendor has not
previously obtained an extension of time, the School Board reserves the right
to collect liquidated damages. Said liquidated damages shall be assessed at
the rate of $200 per calendar day for each day that installation remains
uncompleted after time allotted.
The date of completion of the installation will be the date certified by the
contract administrator that installation is complete in accordance with the
provisions of the purchase order and this invitation to bid.
Successful bidder hereby consents and agrees that it is not necessary for the
School Board to prove monetary 1055.
N. PAYMENT: Payment to Contrnctor will normally be made on completion of work
specified on purchase order. When contract purchase order is issued, partial
payments will be made.
When desiring payment, Contractor shall submit an itemized invoice to the party
making request that work be performed.
Upon receipt of invoice, Owner's representative shall ascertain that. work for
which payment is requested has been performed and materials furnished in
ALL NUMBERED PAGES MUST BE RETURNED FOR BID TO BE CONSIDERED.
5 of 11
'l1li
"
INVITATION NO. SB 92C-72T
accordance with specifications and special conditions set forth herein. If
found to be properly due, Owner's representative shall attach invoice to a
properly executed receiving copy (pink copy) of the purchase order or a
purchase requisition and forward them to the Purchasing Department for process-
ing.
o. BID EXEMPT: Purchases shall not include items available at lower prices on
other School Board of Palm Beach County contracts or State of Florida con-
tracts. The School Board of Palm Beach County reserves the right to bid
separately any item if deemed to be in the best interest of the School Board.
P. BIDDERS RESPONSIBILITY: In addition bidder shall extend during the contract
period any item(s) offered on a "promotional" basis from the manufacturer.
It will be the successful bidder's responsibility to monitor said itern{s) and
report any that are or will be offered at lower price.
Q. CORRECTIONS: All price corrections must be initialed. This includes the use
of correction fluid (white out) or any other method of correction. See Gener-
al Conditions, page 1, number 1, Execution of Bid, for acceptable means of
correction.
R. JOINT-BIDDING, COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT: All bidders submitting a
response to this invitation to bid agree that such response also constitutes
a bid to all State Agencies and Political Subdivisions of the State of Florida
under the same conditions, for the same prices and for the same effective
period as this bid, should the bidder{s) deem it in the best interest of their
business to do so.
This agreement in no way restricts or interferes with any State Agency or
Political Subdivision of the State of Florida to rebid any or all items.
S. WITHDRAWAL: A bidder wishing to withdraw a bid for any reason, after the final
call for bids at the designated time of opening, may not do so unless a writ-
ten request is submitted to the Superintendent of the School Board of Palm
Beach County giving reasons for bid withdrawal. If recommended by the Super-
intendent, this request will be submitted to the Board for their considera-
tion.
T. MINORITY CERTIFICATION APPLICATION: Send the enclosed Minority Certification
Application (if applicable) under separate cover to: Minority Business Enter-
prise, 3910 RCA Boulevard, Suite 1011, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410-4213 .
U. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES: Bidder by virtue of bidding and signature on page one
(1) of Invitation to Bid: Authorized Signature (Manual), certifies that they
have not been convicted of a public entity crime as defined in Section 287.133
of the Florida State Statutes. A public entity crime as defined in Section
287.133 of the Florida State Statutes includes a violation of any state or
federal law by a person with respect to and directly related to the transac-
tion of business with any public entity in Florida or with an agency or polit-
ical subdivision of any other state or with the United States, including, but
not limited to, any bid or contract for goods or services to be provided to
any public entity or such agency or political subdivision and involving anti-
trust, fraud, theft, bribery, collusion, racketeering, conspiracy or material
ALL NUMBERED PAGES MUST BE RETURNED FOR BID TO BE CONSIDERED.
6 of 11 .
".
'.
INVITATION NO. SB 92C-72T
misrepresentation. In addition, bidders certify that they have not been
suspended and/or debarred from Federal Programs.
Attached is a certificate to be completed by all awarded vendors. This cer-
tificate can be submitted with bid or shall be submitted within five (S) days
upon request.
V. DEFAULT: In the event of a default on a contract, the successful bidder shall
pay to the Board, as liquidated damages, an amount equal to 5% of the unit
price bid, times the quantity or $50 whichever amount is larger. In the event
of default on a contract, the successful bidder shall pay all attorneys fees
and court costs in collecting said damages.
W. CANCELLATION: In the event any of the provisions of this bid are violated by
the contractor, the Superintendent or their designee shall give written notice
to the contractor stating the deficiencies and unless the deficiencies are
corrected within ten (10) days, recommendation will be made to the School Board
for immediate cancellation. Upon cancellation hereunder the School Board of
Palm Beach County, Florida, may pursue any and all legal remedies as provided
herein and by law. The School Board of Palm Beach County, Florida, reserves
the right to terminate any contract resulting from this invitation at any time
and for any reason, upon giving 30 days prior written notice to the other
party. If said contract should be terminated for convenience as provided
herein, the School Board shall be relieved of all obligations under said
contract. The School Board of Palm Beach County shall only be required to pay
to the contractor that amount of the contract actually performed to the date
of termination.
X. POSTING OF BID TABULATIONS: Bid tabulations with recommended awards will be
posted for review by interested parties, at the location where bids were
opened, on or about October 14, 1991, and will remain posted for a period of
72 hours. Failure to file a protest within the time prescribed in Section
120.S3{S), Florida Statutes, shall constitute a waiver of proceedings under
Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.
y. POSTING OF BID AND SPECIFICATIONS: Invitation to bid with specifications will
be posted for review by interested parties, at the location where bids are
opened, on the date of bid mailing and will remain posted for a period of 10
days. Failure to file a specification protest within the time prescribed in
Florida Statutes 120.53 3.(b) shall constitute a waiver of proceedings under
Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.
Z. INFORMATION: Any questions by the prospective bidders concerning this invi-
tation to bid should be addressed to Terry L. Rhea, Buyer, Purchasing Depart-
ment (407-624-7268), who is authorized only to direct the attention of prospec-
tive bidders to various portions of the bid so they may read and interpret such
for themselves. Neither Mrs. Rhea nor any employee of the School Board of Palm
Beach County is authorized to interpret any portion of the bid or give infor-
mation as to the requirements of the bid in addition to that contained in the
written bid document. Interpretations of the bid or additional information
as to its requirements, where necessary, shall be communicated to bidders by
written addendum.
ALL NUMBERED PAGES MUST BE RETURNED FOR BID TO BE CONSIDERED.
7 of 11
.".
.
INVITATION NO. SB 92C-72T
SPECIFICATIONS
l. FLOOR REPAIR/REPLACEMENT: Contractor shall repair and replace with new matching
wood all existing damaged or rotten flooring. Fastening of hardwood strip
floors and bonding of replacement parquet sections must be in accordance with
industry approved guidelines and National Maple Floor Manufacturer's Associa-
tion suggested procedures.
2. FLOOR PREPARATION: Preparation of floor for finish application shall be
accomplished as follows:
A. Complete removal of existing floor finish by non-sanding methods. Non-
sanding to be utilized ONLY when floor sanding is impractical or inadvisable
due to conditions such as excessive reduction in floor thickness as result
of previous sandings or where actual floor is acceptable but removal of
finish is necessary.
(1) Finish removal may be accomplished manually (hard scraping) and/or
through the use of chemical strippers.
(2) Preparation will include final smoothing of floor using 80-100 grit
screen discs or fiber.
B. Total sanding of floor.
( 1) All floor sanding shall be done only to the point of providing an
acceptable surface for application of new finish.
(2) Final sanded finish shall be with #2/0 - 100 grit and shall be to a
1/8" tolerance in a la' diameter circle.
C. Fill and sand cracks and dents in floor having any surface dimension
exceeding 1/8" and/or depth exceeding 1/16".
D. Completed floor shall be cleaned and vacuumed with commercial floor equip-
ment and tacked to ensure a dust free surface prior to application of floor
finish.
3. MARKING OF PLAYING COURTS: Contractor shall mark playing courts in accordance
with applicable sports association regulation markings.
All lines and markings shall be replaced as original unless otherwise stated
during the site walk through. A durable colored finish shall be compatible
with the final floor finish.
No markings shall be applied to floor until after one (1) finish seal coat has
been applied.
Replacement of markings shall be in accordance with above specifications.
4. APPLICATION OF FLOOR FINISH: Contractor shall supply all floor finish materials
required to complete work at each job site.
. -- .
ALL NUMBERED PAGES MUST BE RETURNED FOR BID TO BE CONSIDERED.
8 of 11
I','
"
INVITATION NO. SB 92C-72T
Floor finish used by the Contractor shall meet or exceed Florida School Plant
Management Association (FSPHA) specifications or shall be a School Board
approved product as follows: Copies of label from product to be supplied upon
request.
A. Shall produce a high glass, light color and possess durable wearing quali-
ties.
B. Shall be 4-7 an the Gardner Color Standard.
C. Shall be free flowing and shall have a viscosity between A+ and B+ an the
Bardner-Holt Bubble Viscometer.
D. Shall have a spread rate of 400-500 square feet per gallon.
E. Shall spread uniformly without farming bubbles when worked with lambs wool
applicator. Further, finish shall flow evenly without reworking when
applied as a second coat.
F. Shall dry tack-free within eight (8) hours and shall dry hard within 24
hours to permit light sanding or steel wool buffing.
C. Shall, when applied in the form of two (2) coats, be a satisfactory surface
for the application of' spirit and water emulsion waxes.
H. Shall not rubber burn from the use of regulation gym shoes when applied to
floor.
I. Shall not powder, flake or peel off under normal usage.
J. Shall be resist~nt to skimming in the shipping container.
K. Supplied finish material shall comply with the following chemical and
physical requirements:
MIN. MAX.
(1) Nan-volatile matter 40% 41. 5%
(2) 5% caustic soda solution at 6 hrs. - - - SL effect
20 degrees C immersion
(3) Paraffin oil immersion 30 hrs. - - - No effect
(4) Gasoline (no lead) immersion 24 hrs. - - - No effect
(5) 190 wood alcohol immersion 7 hrs. - - - No effect
(6) Boiling water immersion 7 hrs. - - - No effect
(7) Cold water at 77 degrees F 30 hrs. - - - No effect
immersion
(8) Flash point Tee lOooF - - -
-, .-. .
ALL NUHBERED PAGES HOST BE RETURNED FOR BID TO BE CONSIDERED.
9 of 11
".
.
INVITATION NO. sa 92C-72T
(9) Suspended inorganic matter 0.0% 0.1%
(10 ) Dilution 1000% - - -
(11 ) Soap 20% neutral immersion, no 24 hrs. - - -
effect
(12) Clarify Clear Clear
(13 ) Specific gravity .873 .89
(14 ) Sward hardness 44 - - -
A minimum of four (4) coats of finish shall be applied as follows:
A. Apply first coat to bare wood as a seal coat.
B. Apply markings.
C. Apply three (3) additional coats with ample drying time between coats.
D. All finish coats and markings shall be abraded between coats to assure
satisfactory adhesion of succeeding coats.
5. PERIODIC RECOATING OF FLOOR: Entire floor shall be abraded using #80 grit screen
disks to remove all oils, stains and loose finish from floor.
Abraded floor shall be cleaned and vacuumed with commercial floor equipment
and tacked to ensure a dust free surface before application of finish coat.
Vendors are requested to provide the below requested pricing:
BID SUMMARY SHEET
Item 1. FLOORING, WOOD; New, per square foot.
MFG. Action Floors, MFG. NO. 33/32x2-1 /4", 2ndrnit $ 2.47 /Sq. Ft.
TOTAL COST ITEM 1 $ 2.47/Sq. Ft.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Additional Charges, Labor, For Following Services:
a. Removal of existing flooring $ .48 /sq.ft.
b. Installation, new flooring $ .42 /sq.ft.
c. Preparation of floor (sanding) $ .29 /sc:.ft. -
d. Preparation of floor (non-sanding method) $ . I
.41 /sq.ft.~' '~
e. Replace markings (not wider than 3") $ . 1 2 /sq.ft.
f. Replace special markings (school insignias, $ 7.00 /sq.ft.
center circles, key areas and borders)
ALL NUMBERED PAGES MUST BE RETURNED FOR BID TO BE CONSIDERED.
10 of 11
I'.
"
INVITATION NO. SB 92C-72T
g. Application of finish coats (4 total) $ .45 /sq.ft. -
h. Recoating floor (periodic) (1 total) $ .21 /sq.ft.
Submit price for floor finish to be used by successful bidder. Price is for
additional information and will remain firm for entire contract period.
MFG.Hillyard MFG. NO. #285 UNIT $ 96.20 jper 5 gallon container.
Gold Medalist
mNORITY STATUS:
Please indicate if a minority-owned (51%) business. Yes No X
-
If answer was yes, please indicate which minority group:
Black-African-American - Hispanic American -
Asian American Asia-Indian American
- -
Indian American Female
- -
Physically Disabled Other
-
If minority-owned business, please be sure to fill out the attached Minority
Certificate Application.
5 ATTACHMENTS
ALL NUHBERED PAGES MUST BE RETURNED FOR BID '1'0 BE CONSIDERED.
11 of 11
i"~
..
I ,;,i ,,// '
.. -~('--
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: David Harden
City Manager
FROM: Joe Weldon
Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: MASTER PLAN - LEON WEEKES PRESERVE
DATE: March 31, 1992
Attached please find a proposal from Dr. Daniel Austin of Florida
Atlantic University to prepare a site plan for Leon Weekes Preserve that
will include investigation of the vertebrate and plant community. The
cost of the proposal is $15,000 and charged to account #
117-4169-572-33.19.
Please include this on the April 14 agenda for commission consideration.
Jo
Di Parks & Recreation
JW:giv
REF: DHARDEN.DOC
,. ,."
FROM:SPONSORED RESEARCH TO: 407 243 3774 MAR 26, 1992
~ 3:45PM P,02
. FLQRIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
P.O, sox 3081
eOOA RATON, FLORIDA 334:;11 -oea 1
DIVISION OF SPONSORED RESEARCH
(407) 367.2310
FAX (407) 367-2319
March 26, 1992
~lr. Joe We idon
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of DeIray Beach
100 N. W. 1st Avenue
DeIray Beach, Florida 33444
RE: l,eon M. Weekes Environ.ental Preserve Master Plan
Dear Mr. Weldon:
On behalf of Dr. Daniel Austin and Florida Atlantic Universlty, I am
forwarding two copies of a Sponsored Research Agreelllent between the City of
Delray Beach and Florida Atlantic University. Please have both copies signed
and return them to me in the Division of SponEwred Research (Administration
Building, Room 201) for execution. I will return a fully executed copy to you
as promptly as possible.
Please contact me at 407/367-2310, if I can be of service t.o you or your
staff in processing this agreement in any way.
Sincerely yours,
~
Sandra Mann
Research SerVice/Program Coordinator
c: D. Austin
n_M n..~nn . t:nf't 1 Al.nRl'dele . Davie. Palm Beach Gardens
'.
..
. r-~OM:SPONSORED RESEARCH TO: 407 243 3774 MAR 26, 1992 3:46PM P.03
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
SPONSORED RESEARCH AGREEMENT
THI S J S AN AGREEMENT, entered into <>n March 27, 1992, between The Ci ty of
Delray Beach a Public Agency, on behalf of the City of Delray Beach Department
of Pal"k~ and Recreation, existing under the laws of the state of Florida (the
"Sponsorll ) and FLORIPA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY, a member of the State University
System of the State of Florida, acting for a.nd on behalf of the Board of Regents,
a public corporation of t.he state of Florida (the llUniversityll).
The Sponsor clesi res to have access to data, conclusions and products of
research and developmellt. investigations pertaining to certain activities of
Sponsor. The Uni versi ty has been requested by Sponsor to conduct a research
project to provide the desired information.
In consideration of the covenants and conditions contained in this
Agreement (the "Agreement") a.nd other good and val uabl e consideration, the
adequt:l(:y and receipt of which are acknowledged, the Sponsor and University agree
aR follows:
1. The Department of Biology in the College of Science, through the
Division of Sponsored Research of the University, will develop and ca.rry out a
resear'ch project to be known as: "The !'f...On M. Weeke~.Environ.en~{l.J.heBcrve M~~~r
l'lan" . The Project is briefly described as follows: A biological survey and
master plan will be developed for t~e City of Pel ray Beach for the city park
known as the Leon M. Weekes Environmental Preserve. Please note attached Scope
of Work. (the "Project").
2. The Director of the Project for the University is Dr. Daniel Austin
(the "Project Director-II). 1'he Project. Pi rector shall have respotlsi bE ity for
technical direction of the Project, the administration of Project funds and for
preparation and submission of written and oral reports to Sponsor. Students,
staff memhers or members of the University faculty who par'ticipate in t.his
Project wi Jl, while so engaged, be under the technical and administrative
supervision of the Project Director, or in the absence of the Project Director,
the appropriate College Dean, Depart.ment Chair, Division Head or University Vice
President.
3. The Sponsor and the University agree that the Project will begin on
or about Apri 1 1, 1992 and wi 1] be completed by June 30, 1992, unless the
parties, by II'llltual writt.en agreement, extend the time for completion.
4. Sponsor agrees to pay the University the total sum of $15,000. It is
payable as follows: $7,500 upon execution of this agreement and $7,500 upon
completion and submission of the Master Plan. Sponsor acknowledges and agrees
that performance by the University is contingent upon receipt of payment by the
Sponsor, on the date(s) prescribed above. The failure of Sponsor to make timely
payments may require t.he University to cease project work and terminate t.his
Agreement. 'l'he University agrees to provide notice of such cessation,
termination or both in writing to Sponsor.
rr<:UI'I' ot-'UN~URED RESEARCH TO: 407 243 3774 MAR 26, 1992 3:47PM P,05
. . .
.
;-
PROPOSAL TO MAKE A MASTER PLAN OF THE
DELRAY BEACH SCRUB PARK
I. PI~RS()NNEJ ..:
J}rincipat Investigator:
Dr. DANIELE AUSTIN, Professor and Curator of the Herbarium
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University
Student Assistants:
Ms. JUDITH HICKLIN, Biology; community and vertebrate specialist.
Ms. CHRISTINfi LocKHART, Biology; community speciali~t
Ms. RENEE RASHA, Geography; remote sensing and drafting specialist
II. SITE:
.
City property (about 9 acres) east of Albatross and Curlew Streets, south of Linton
Boulevard (Township 468, Range 43E, SE corner of Soot. 32).
Ill. SCOPE 01;' SRRVJCI~S:
1) Prepare a list of all vascular plants present inc1udi ng:
a) Endangered and threatened plants, with commentary on the population size and
recommendations on how the species might be managed or protected.
b) Exotic plants with commentary on their economic and ecological impacts and
j mportance;
2) Prepare a vegetation map on the scale of tht; tax aerial photographs;
3) Prepare a discussion of the community structure; and
4) Provide information of community dynamics.
5). Work with you and your staff in the preparation of a Master Plan for the site.
IV, TIME SCUEI>U...f::
The above items will be provided in writing to your office three months after thc beginning
of a contract between Florida Atlantic University and the City of Delray Beach.
v. BUDGET:
I. OPS (Field survey, writing and drafting report) $ t t ,040,00
II. Supplies and miscellaneous $ 1,000.00
111. Travel $ 200.00
IV. Overhead@ 25% ofOPS $ 2,760.00
TOT A I... $15,000.00
.
. ..
Agenda Item No. :
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: APRIL 2, 1992
Request to be placed on:
Regular Agenda
Special Agenda
Workshop Agenda When: APRTT. 14, l.qQ?
XXX CONSENT AGENDA
Description of item (who, what, where, how much):
CASE II ADDRESS GRANT AM0UNT
90-007HR 913 S.W. 4TH AVE. $14,341. 95
91-013HR 304 S.W. 11TH AVE. $14,290.50
91-047HR 605 S.E. 2ND AVE. $14,282.10
. .
(Example: Request from Atlantic High School for $2,000 to fund
project graduation).
ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO
Recommendation: RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
HOUSING REHABILITATION GRANT AWARDS AND CONTRACT AWARDS FROM ACCOUNT #118-1963-554-60.23
GRANT AMOUNT INCLUDES CONTINGENCY.
(Example: Recommend approval with funding from Special Events Account
No. 00 1 - 3 3 3 3 - 5 5 5 - 4 4 . 5 5 ) . ." :
Department Head Signature, ~ ~
City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure
of funds):
Funding available: YES/ NO I
Funding alternatives: (if applicable)
Account No. &. Description:
Account Balance:
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: 8/ NO lJ1'1
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action: Approved/Disapproved
~
, ~
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: 'rED GLAS, PURCHASING ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DOROTHY ELLINGTON, CD COORDINATOR ~~
'rHRU: LULA BUTLER, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DIRECTOR ~
DATE: A.PRIL 2, 1992
SUBJECT: HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM
Attached, please find Community Development's Housing
Rehabilitation package, Bid ~92-26. This package is submitted
for the Consent Agenda scheduled for APRIL 14, 1992.
This package is submitted to your office per Purchasing policies
and Procedures.
HR2/PAGE2
10;.
"
,
,
M E M 0 RAN DUM
-rO: DAVID HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
FROM: DOROTHY ELLINGTON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
THRU: l.ULA BUTLER, DIRECTOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTLJ(;
DATE: APRIL 2, 1992
3UBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
HOUSING REHABILITATION GRANT AWARDS
ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION
This is to request approval for three Housing Rehabilitation
Grant Awards. This request is in accordance with the City's
Community Development Division's approved Policies and
Procedures.
BACKGROUND
The grant award is based on the actual cost of the rehabilitation
as determined by the low bidder, plus a 5% contingency. The
contingency may be used for change orders. All unused funds
remain with the Housing Rehabilitation grant program.
Inspection of work is done by the Department of Community
Improvement's Building Inspection and Community Development
Divisions. Contracts are executed between the building
contractor and the property owner. The City remains the agent
and this office monitors all work performed by the contractor
ensuring compliance according to specifications and program
guidelines. Pay Request forms require both contractor and
homeowner's signatures. Grant recipients have met all
eligibility requirements as specified in the approved policies
and Procedures.
The rehabilitation activity will bring the homes to minimum code
requirements by repairing roofs, electric and plumbing systems
and correcting other incipient code violations. Detailed work
write-ups and individual case file are available for review at
the Community Development Division Office.
The Contract Award and Bid Summary sheets are attached for your
reference.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Housing Rehab Grants be awarded for the
.following:
Case# Address Gran-c: Amount
90-007HR 913 S.W. 4TH AVE. $14,341.95
91-013HR 304 s.w. 11TH AVE. 't14,290.50
91-047HR 605 S.E. 2ND AVE. '614,282.10
liR2
.
"
.
.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
BID INFORMATION SHEET
BID #: 92- ~HR
APPLICANT: JORGE & TERESA GARCIA
APPLICATION #: 90-007HR
PROJECT ADDRESS: 913 SOUTHWEST 4TH AVENUE
DATE OF BID LETTERS: MARCH 2, 1992
DATE OF BID OPENING: MARCH 13, 1992
NAME OF CONTRACTORS AMOUNT OF BID
ABISSET CORPORATION $ 15,205.00
B & JR CONSTRUCTION $
CSB CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 25.470.00
1ST CONSTRUCTION OF PALM BEACHES $
GAMZO, INC. $ 19,062.00 (NO BID BOND)
GREGORY CONSTRUCTION INC. $
HENRY L. HAYWOOD $ 13,659.00
INTERCONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION CORP $ 16,360.00
MARK GRIFFITH $
MJD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES $ 16,546.45
MSL CONSTRUCTION, INC. $
M.S.S. CONSTRUCTION $
PRESTON CONSTRUCTION $ 14,310.00
~AUL GEORGE BUILDERS $
RAY GRAEVE CONSTRUCTION INC. $
IN - HOUSE ESTIMATE: $ 16,760.00
CONTRACTOR AWARDED CONTRACT: HENRY HAYWOOD
BID/CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ 13,659.00
COMMENTS: LOW RID
BIDFORM/PGl
.,
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
aOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
BID INFORMATION SHEET
BID #: 92- 26 HR
APPLICANT: VICTOR & LILLIAN FLORES
APPLICATION #: 91-047HR
PROJECT ADDRESS: 605 SOUTHEAST 2ND AVENUE
DATE OF BID LETTERS: MARCH 2, 1992
DATE OF BID OPENING: MARCH 13, 1992
NAME OF CONTRACTORS AMOUNT OF BID
ABISSET CORPORATION $
B & JR CONSTRUCTION $
CSB CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 27,680.00
1ST CONSTRUCTION OF PALM BEACHES $
GAMZO, INC. $ 16,813.00 (NO BID BOND)
GREGORY CONSTRUCTION INC. $
HENRY L. HAYWOOD $ 13.602.00
INTERCONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION CORP $ 18,935.00
MARK GRIFFITH $
MJD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES $
MSL CONSTRUCTION, INC. $
M.S.S. CONSTRUCTION $
PRESTON CONSTRUCTION $
eAUL GEORGE BUILDERS $
RAY GRAEVE CONSTRUCTION INC. $
IN - HOUSE ESTIMATE: $ 16,825.00
CONTRACTOR AWARDED CONTRACT: HENRY HAYWOOD
BID/CONTRACT AMOUNT: $13,602.00
COMMENTS: LOW BID
BIDFORM/PGl
1-;.
.
. -
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
BID INFORMATION SHEET
BID #: 92 -26HR
APPLICANT: ROSE BRINSON
APPLICATION #: 9l-013HR
i?ROJECT ADDRESS: 304 SOUTHWEST 11TH AVENUE
DATE OF BID LETTERS: MARCH 2, 1992
PATE OF BID OPENING: MARCH 13, 1992
NAME OF CONTRACTORS .AMOUNT OF BID
ABISSET CORPORATION $ 15,370.00
B & JR CONSTRUCTION $
CSB CONSTRUCTION, INC. $
1ST CONSTRUCTION OF PALM BEACHES $
GAMZO, INC. $ 14.593.00 (NO BID BOND)
GREGORY CONSTRUCTION INC. $
HENRY L. HAYWOOD $ 13,345.00
INTERCONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION CORP $ 16.950.00
MARK GRIFFITH $
MJD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES * $ 13,610.00
MSL CONSTRUCTION, INC. $
M.S.S. CONSTRUCTION $
PRESTON CONSTRUCTION $
PAUL GEORGE BUILDERS $
RAY GRAEVE CONSTRUCTION INC. * $ $13.610.00
IN - HOUSE ESTIMATE: $ 16.625.00
CONTRACTOR AWARDED CONTRACT: MJD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
BID/CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ 13.610.00
COMMENTS: HAYWOOD CONSTRUCTION WITHDREW AS LOW BIDDER BECAUSE HE WON TWO
OTHER BIDS. TIE BIDS DECIDED THROUGH COIN TOSS (ACCEPTABLE PRACTICE, PER PUR-
CHASING ADMINISTRATOR.)
BIDFORM/PGl
".
"
. ~
I . .
.
Agenda Item No,:
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: Apri 1 6, 1992
Request to be placed on:'
COiU.,$r~T ,4W,...,DA
xxx R~ar ~a Special Agenda Horkshop Agenda
When: April 14, 1992
Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much): Staff requests City
Commission to approve the purchase of "3 Stage Poly Air Scrubber"for odor control from Davis Pro"..,;,; t:o be
installed at Lift Station 80. The uni twas i nsta 11 ed January 24 for a test tri a 1 and seems to be doin9
extremely well. Cost is $39,500 and $6,000 for maintenance. chemicals and reDlacemnt of all equipment:
Funding source will be 441-5162-536-61.16.
ORD~HANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: ~;S</ NO Draft Attached: !I:iltE.8/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Commission to approve the purchase of the "3 StaQe
Poly Air Scrubber" from Davis Process Division (approved supplier by City of Delray Rp.a"h)
;".,
Department Head Signature:
Determination of Consistency Plan:
"!"
City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure
of funds):
Funding available: ~/ NO ~f applicable)
Funding alternatives: IfW ,dZ ,\5b c../ /,,(
Account No. & Description: flJ. I;;,rvO - 3 S7Jl<~
~ccount Balance, f/ ~,J:t: hLylt1tL SG-wSf.S ~
Cit Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: @/ NO (;t;J\
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action: Approved/Disapproved
,...",
"
",- -i~ I
, f
CIty d ne1ray Beach
~BlJdget Transfer
dlVtRO~~iEN T;\i. 5E RV ICES
ranater If> Date March 23. 1992
92 APR - 3 P It: I 8 ~."? / 6-S 1J -.. .
(3) Interfundllnterdepartrnental Transfer R E C !. . vt frtch Number
.. ,1::1> , -~
(5) Requested By: George Abou-Jaoude. Deputy Director of Public Utilities
(6 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION (8 TRANSFER OUT 9 TRANSFER IN
Budget Amendment:
441-0000-301-39.00 Prior Year Surplus - $ 34.430
1984 Water and Sewer
Revenue Bond
441-0000-361-39.00 84 Water & Sewer INterest 5.336 I
441-51A2-536-61.16 3 Stage Poly Air Scrubber $ 39.766
~
Budget Transfer:
441-5162-536-'xx 61.79 Rehab 112M Gal Elev Tank 5,800 J
--
441-5162-536-61.16 3 Stage Poly Air Scrubber 5,800
,if- I
t~
,
(10) TOTAL $ 45,566 $ 45,566
JUSTIFICATION: Transfer necessary for purchase of "3 Stage Poly Air Scrubber"
J ,
for installation at LS 80 for odor control. This will include $39 500 for the
purchase of the unit and $6000.00 for maintenance and chemicals. Also include
full warranty for all equipment and material. , .
De
(12) Control Number QjO 302 i
:
(13) Period (14) Count 5 ---. _.- ._~ - -
1""1"'"'''''''' """,,...... ,.. . . fA"" .."... ",. ", ....~... a .-_. .........
,.,.
"
,~" .: 6> f)
MEMORANDUM
... .".,---..TO: David T. Harden
City Manager
FROM: George ',Abou-Jaoude
Deputy Director of Public utilities
. "',, .
SUBJECT: ODOR CONTROL UNITS AT LIFT STATIONS
DATE: March 19, 1992
This is a continuation of my evaluation to the existing odor
control un~ts purchased and installed by Pump and Equipment Co.
-......-..--.-. ..... .
I have attached a copy of the bid tabulation, aid #91-46, for
your infQrmation. I contacted all three suppliers to discuss the
issue.;'! attempted three times to reach a Calgon representative
and have had no response.
Mr. David Stoehr from Tigg Corp. faxed a revised cost for two
different models. Tigg Corp. does not recommend carbon
regeneration. The cost for new carbon is $785/250 Ibs and is
delivered in cylinders of 2000 Ibs (total cost $6280.00). The
f costs for the odor units are $10,255 for 720 CFM and $14,735 for
1160 CFM.
Mr. Phil Liston from Westates Carbon, Inc. mentioned that.Pump &
Equipment bought the carbon from them and to this date has not
paid for it. He will not honor the price quoted until he
I inspects the sites and reviews his records.
Also attached are copies of the sulfide readings for Lift
stations #50 & #80 for the month of February. Because of no
complaints and the readings, I believe that the three stage Poly
Air Scrubber by Davis is performing well.
The scrubber supplied by Davis was installed on January 24 for a
30 day trial test. The trial period was due on February 24. I
told the Davis representative that we are still evaluating the
unit.
,
1>"
.
,-, .' ..
4'-.... I
,-
I. support my first recommendation on leasing the wet scrubber
with option to purchase. Davis Process will apply 75% of the
lease program toward purchasing the unit. The cost for this
scrubber is $39,500.00. I do not recommend installing Tigg
Corporation's unit because they 'have no local representatives and
all correspondence is throug~ virginia. I have no commitments
from Westates Carbon, Inc.
Please review and advise.
& /1
George A~~ude
GA:smm
ATTS:
File: Memos to city Manager
. A:.ODOR. DOC
;.
i~.i
..l;'
.~~
f ......
. .~. --- ----'.
J
I
" ','
\
..-......-----. . .....
I".
"
"1~;.4 ,
. .. I
f\~", \.\D""dl...'" :
M E M 0 RAN DUM eo..-. 1:. ; ... l. '-'a L- t\,',...
I ~\- o'{ f ('('..r-v1, ~ '1'
II G 5 (AI"'" _:? P):....... P'w.-'t..t
TO: D~vid T. Harden C~'l/ JL
CJ.ty Manager r
I
,
FROM: George Abou-Jaoude
Deputy Director/P.U.
SUBJ: ODOR AND'SCRUBBER AT LIFT STATION 80
,
DATE: March 9,'1992
We installed one (1) three stage Poly Air Scrubber, 500 CFM, with
the use of caustic and bleach chemicals at Lift Station 80. Lift
Station 80 is located west of Congress Avenue off of Lake Ida
Road at L.W.D.D. E 3 1/2 canal. The station has a carbon unit
for gas and odor absorption supplied by Pump & Equipment Co. of
Boynton Beach and installed October 17, 1991.
,;,/
Since~the installation of the carbon unit, we had numerous odor
complaints from the surrounding residents.
On January 24, 1992, with your permission, I instructed Davis
Process Division to install the wet scrubber identified above for
test trial period of 30 days. We monitored the odors and gases
l' during this time and the findings are shown on the attached
r report by peroxidation Systems, Inc. Please compare sulfide
levels between Stations 50 and 80. station 50 is approximately
the same size as 80 and has the same carbon unit.
Since my association with this division, I have been challenged
-- -", '-'--"with the existing problems with odors and gases at the Master
.' Lift station and stations 50 and 80. I made several
investigations on the carbon units in use and found that the
units are not sized adequately and are not monitored by Pump and
Equipment as indicated in their bid. I contacted Mr. Prugh from
Pump & Equipment around mid-December and requested an evaluation
on the units. Mr. Dave Dubberly met with me at station 50 and
promised that he will get back with me as soon as possible with
his evaluation. I called another meeting on February 5, 1992,
since, I have not received anything from Pump & Equipment and the
minutes to this meeting are attached. Pump & Equipment stated
that they would come back with an evaluation wi thin two weeks
which I have not received to this date. I went a little further
on my investigation which resulted in discovering that Pump &
Equipment had been involved in approximately (5) five legal suits
in the last several years.
'.
~ -
$ ,
- '."
.....
Lift stations 50, 80 and the Master were installed without
purchasing or budgeting for any stand-by new carbon or
regeneration of old carbon. The cost are highlighted in the
attached fax. It will cost $6,100.00 for each station (50 and
80) and $1,249.00 for blower parts for breakdowns. Master Lift
station will cost $14,550.00. In their proposal, it is indicated
that there will be a monthly check-up by their service technician
for sulfide reading to determine the needed time for carbon
changing. To this date, there has not been any readings of
sulfide levels by Pump & Equipment.
u" ,__ ~... ._. ---". I have attached the proposal, for the wet scrubber by Davis. The
cost to keep it on line is $19,500jyear. This cost includes the
thirty (30) days trial for $3,000.00 and $1,500jmonth for
maintenance and chemicals.
I recommend approval to lease this unit for station 80 and work
towards leasing two additional units for station 50 and the
Master Lift station in the coming budget year. The funds for
leasing the scrubber can be transferred from. account
#441-5141-536-536-60.89 capital outlay for the sewer collection
group,~ 'The approved budget reflect a purchase of the Assembly
for:1(ac-con at $12,000.00, $6,500.00 9-ton trailer and 1 inch
high~pressure hose for $1,000.00. The hose was bought last year
and the other items are not necessary.
I' have attached a budget transfer to Lift station Maintenance
account # 441-5144-536-33.42 Rental Equipment for your review and
approval.
J Please call me for additional information.
I
I
GA:pw
cc: Memos To city Manager
Robert Bullard, Maintenance Superintendent
FILE; ODOR
.....
--. . - ._-" --'--'-
, .
'"
, .
-
. '
.
k,
DAVIS- ,'" "'i"ir '; ';:: :i':: ':Sf3fyJ7YtJt~~ Waler In_dUslry Since 1938"_____,
.1" .\. I'
92 FED \ 0 PI1 l~: 0 \ 2650 Tullevast I~oad
PROCESS diVa P,Q, Box 29
February 7, 1992 Fax 407/243-7060. . t : -, ", Tallevast FL 34270-0029
I," " . ~ ' ','" I ) 813-355-2971
" ~ L\~ ~t." ~.(.!. \t I!,- L.. FAX: 813-351-4756
... ~-
Mr. George Abou-Jaoude
Deputy Director of Public Utilities
City of Delray Beach
434 South Swinton Avenue ,
Delray Beach, FL 33444 '.
RE: SCRUBBER PURCHASE/LEASE OPTIONS
Dear Mr. Abou-Jaoude:~;;
Davis Process D~vision appreciates your interest in our scrubber system. As per your
request, I have listed three options available as per your request.
1 .~y Purchase one (1) Tri-Plex Air Scrubber for $39,500.00. Price includes
. ,~~'
installation and mobilization.
2i', Lease one (1) Tri-Plex Air Scrubber for a minimum of one (1) year at
$1,000.00 per month. At the end of the lease, 75% or $9,000.00 may be
_' P_,.t____ applied to the purchase price of $39,500.00. There will be a ~ ~nO.@fee for
mobilization and installation. ~/OOO
3. With either, of the above options, Davis Process will offer a service contract
for $500.00 per month. This service includes a weekly mainteriance program,
a_~' .'_" .__". replacement of all parts and equipment and all chemicals needed to operate
I the scrubber. )
Again, let me thank you for considering Davis Water & Waste Industries, Inc., Process
Division for the control of your odor problem.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at 1-800-345-3982.
Sincerely,
DAVIS WATER & WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Process Division
~~
Taverrite
ales Representative
JT/sw
A: Delray .Scb
'.
.
"
Agenda Item No.:
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: 4/6/92
Request to be placed on:
~ Regular Agenda
_____ Special Agenda
_____ Workshop Agenda When: 4/14/92
Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Staff request award of the
CBD Alleyway Reconstruction Project to Jack Hardy, Inc. for $483,771. 00,
Proiect No. 91-53. Funding source 225-3162-541-61.43 (Decade of Excellence)
$366,557.50, Water and Sewer $93,454.00, Reimbursement from the eRA $23,759.50
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval
Department Head Signature: \?l)~~. 4/7/')?-
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable)
Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds):
Funding available: YES/NO
Funding alternatives (if applicable)
Account No. & Description
Account Balance
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: fiJ/NO f,1JU1
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
..
.
.
Agenda Item No.:
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: 4/6/92
Request to be placed on:
~ Regular Agenda
_____ Special Agenda
_____ Workshop Agenda When: 4/14/92
Description of item (who, what, where, how much): Staff request award of the
CBD Alleyway Reconstruction Project to Jack Hardy, Inc. for $483,771.00,
Project No. 91-53. Funding source 225-3162-541-61.43 (Decade of Excellence)
$366,557.50, Water and Sewer $93,454.00, Reimbursement from the CRA $23,759.50
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval
Department Head Signature: \?l)~Jv- 4/7/'1?-
Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable)
Budget Director Review (~red on all items involving expenditure of funds):
Funding available: ~ 7NO
Funding alternatives (if apPlicab~
Account No. & Description'Z-"}S-3"2..--c:;41.IaI-43 ~yVvJiN ~ /()It/
Account Balance 37fo /72..8f,
. . I 442-SI1&-S~ .bl--tl wP\fe.e M€Tet< Q~. P~RAM
Cl. t Y Manager Rev l.ew: 1<2.,2$ .4! -reO..rar asez."~ r , '2-1Ii~, 1'14-.
Approved for agenda: YES/NO
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Placed on Agenda:
Action:
Approved/Disapproved
,..
.
.
MEMORANDUM
RECEIVED
TO: David T. Harden APR t 0 '''2
city Manager CITY At
FROM: Ralph E. Hayden, P.E.~ ~NAGER'S OFFICE
City Engineer
DATE: April 6, 1992
SUBJECT: CBD Alley Reconstruction, Project No. 91-53
Enclosed is an agenda request and bid tabulation for the CBD
Alley Reconstruction Project. Please place this on the
April 14, 1992 Commission Agenda. We recommend award of
this contract to Jack Hardy, Inc. , the lowest responsible
responsive bidder in the amount of $483,771.00. Funding for
this project will be as follows:
Decade of Excellence (225-3162-541-61.43) $366,557.50
Water and Sewer (442-5178-536-61.81) $ 93,454.00
Reimbursment from the CRA 23,759.50
RH:mm
File: Project No. 91-53
Memos to City Manager
RH153406.MRM
I'.
'.
. r've :r ql-S:.:~ C f!/-JRtC$ G-OL-7:> tTN' &ArH.e' ;TAc/<' /JSP,Jy/J~1 QC$791V J.5AY
W4/Tc'slbC) ..TNC, e-N6- , ~ I/A.R])Y/ ..T#c. c~ ,N'.577P (/C77Q N CdN57?C'VC7707J.:lH& .
eBb ALL I::Y nrA Y ,.eCIVS,7,l>~ Or 7>A~/>'1 &7K-ij
Jo' ".LUlU." u. .'D .Iteu
"" ".tl.at.. Unit. 'I'O'I'AL In. ______.~-$fi.z~. _.
IIll. JDII lIall QlWlUl.l< U!aa Wl:I 35 000'- _~9_J_,2 t?f!..=.. .;ZCJ981- 5..< /0/-
, ) ._--- _.._,,_ ... "..:Ju_. .._____ ------..'-J -.---..--.",. ---.
1 Clurhl'J a..
,rubb!nt 35 000 - 1-t) 500- ,;ztJ,131V/- 5':<. /0/ - 75/!;'1-
LwIp aUII ,da.. LI 1 ,-,-
Dollar. G~ 1:50 i!:.S,
-----2-~J!QO'..:..- __._____..$"5; ()OO- . ,;2.<(1-19'1 - i 95 S9.3-
i!ift['. ... ""......- .. +..--.. ..' . ._---.-_.. )......-.---......".--- ..
I tP /i,. /30 Bli
1 lart.bwork .'. _____.2_.;?r-OOO- 5.:5.(2Q.{)~ ______.l-....2d.9.2._=__ 9s:,3 93-
1M., aWl ,doe. LI 1 '-'- - I ----
Dollau
CanU
3 rlolu.ah and In.taU ..2~ .____,,_ri?~_= _ :z;z- ;<.:2__ -_._._-~~g._--
,- cla.. U dl&ctU. _._.~.~..__._--_. .
Inn pip. .nd --.----- -",,-.'--""--------- ..-- --
.pploIrt.ananc.. /7. 1350'" .,ZS) (;;2.8 -
price pn Un..r .... ... '-'- ,;2.. o. 1/-120 - .L8 l.CJCJ .- /8 7-t::>tJ .-
loot I --- -._-~ -
DoUan ,
c."u
450- _.__._ 5,,9.$-: 450- -f..4.i!:.~ ___.___.~:z.;=__ _.._d
.. ",r~l..h.NI 1natall ------.--.-....---
.. ,at. vaha a1\4 I
ap,urtananca. .:< .2 50 - .2, ?.z~ ~St) ,- ,,:( 3 / CJ .- .:?, 8 (; CJ -
.daa par a.aM .. . 1_ '- ._.
---l- ---- ____=-+--:_d____d. ..."'..
DoUara
Ca"t.
I 'un"lI and In.tdl 37.5- -- ___.___~g_.z= __ ._ __.___$..$'o .- - ___.:...___-2./}-?:~ -?;Zc, -=__.
I" ,ata valva
anct ap,..etananoa. 7-50 - ____________2>_5~__= ~tJ- -7- i!t!::._ ____'l€.?- -_____
'rlc. P'I' .a. tA . '- '- .-----.- .---.-.--.-.--- . ----..-..-.- ---
DoUar.
C.nt.
I hrnhh and 1".tlll 3. 075- 2. :l.. 00- / .:z.CJO ,- __..;3.1 f3,SCJ - ...:?).OcJt1-
II- II I" t.ppin, J - --- J- . ,,,--.----,, ____,___J___ .-.,. . . --- -
.laav& and "Aha
and a,purt."ano.. 3 (; 75- ~L;2_00 =. I .;200- _ ..___.___._~f:1-=?-t;!~- ..z 000-
a.u_p au prloa, LI I '-,'- --+-- ___,__________ __J___..... d..... " .. -).-...---"'---
Dolla1'a
Ca"t.
._______ __.__"lZ~ --------."//--::.. /I~". ..< ?~ 4'<
, Vahr ..rvloa -~_.._.. ---------.-.. . -_."- ." ___.___..3/...:=:.m
,.04l",,'QUon 8. 791. ~
.dca per lln..r .Z...5 &>0 - '=? 08()- :3 il4a,-- 1-: r CJ{) ,-
toot, Lr ... '- '- y--".---.-. ---- ---,,---_..~ -----. .------_. "___,,_ _.___J.___.________.
DelUII"
Ca"t.
/lO_-" .,2 75- --------._;!.~!!. -.. //5- -- /-?P",~
. .aloaat. wat.r . --"-.--,,.-. - - . ---..---.-----.-.------.
..t.r 550 --
Pdc. p.r ..ch, tA . '- '-- ___~.L~_'t~:_ __.,._ __,,__..~_.?2.t7 C/_ ::.__ 515- _______._"____ ?- .!?..t2.=_____
--------.-,--.-=-- ..----.----....-...- --_..._~......._.-..-
DoUan
C.nta
. w,...t "'a\v. _._____J$-. ------?--$.=. ----_./~!!--~ - /t2.Q:'=. ~-
bOil 01' "at.' MUll -.'-- --
t. Ira"',
.1"1.. ,.r aactu .. .. '- 1_- ,:( 375- .6__fl.. 7-€::" :3 750'- ____---_._.d-"J.__2./2t2::.._ /. 8 Z-S- -
. _.~.~. ._._..._..-..._.~-_.......-~-_.._--- ------.1---... -....----"-
DoUara
(:."ta
- ._._...H.._..____..__ ..-.....-.'....-.-.-- /3?-~ -?~Be;
11 ..oonotruot .."t.. __.___ . _/ 3;2,- 35- _.______dJ?:-.. _.
1..., uwU' I..tanl ------..- -. ...- .--.--. _".m.. "".. _._.... ,,_".. . ..,' . ... _.__._._____.__, e.:-'==.~. ~__
PI' loe poI' Un.ar r; 4 800'- /6 /300 .- 7, GOt)- c; (; .L CJ ()CJ ~ .:<.:z 4..tl.f?J-
toat. Lr ... '- '-
.------.; _____2_ _____._._._
Dolla...
Cant.
1.1 "..onoh.... ..va.. . -fo aco~ 3?-;3(;/.j- .5CJ 650'- , 4/ /t'Jo-ff2- 37- 3(;Lf -
pLp. r.C:Qn.tl'~o\10111 --_.--- . -.~... "..._.--'" -------j. -_. ..--._~---- --."" ------.........,J--"....-. . .". ..-''''"-- ..;)..-.--"--. ----..
pl'io& pal' lup aual LI 1 '- '--.- .___.___u_ ,,4Q/-.g.lJJJ".__ ___m____,,_.:s..Z341.~.. SO ~50'-1 9../. /tJof.P- 3 1- ;.d_e, ~ -=--
"....... --..--- ".....j,,-------..----....------..---------- . -~.-
DoUan
Cant.
/.57-5- / 175- "_0-1.__T.8:- / C,5o .- :1. (;,0 -
U "1I1hrr a."'... .; ---' ".----.,,1---- . . . .. " .. --....J--.."..--..--..-. ____ "..;._cP._... __. .___. 'u
.aAhol. nplac...nt
.d. 'II' ....., tA . '- '--... ._ .3/50- ..f 950'- ...d 35~- 3. 300 - .5 3.20 .-
_______ .." '''u ..."...__ ____J_.__._______ __m__. -J.-----.....---- .----::;.>---.--.------.." '____.n__~
DoUa,.
e."t.
-'-.-.....--
U ..plao. ,,0UM'" /05- ~$..: 6:0'- _._--_//??~ _________.___..tf_q.=__ _
ot .....u... .awa&'
..I. -------.-..-.----..
Pl'loa p'l' 11"..1' ___._~....~{?O --=_ _____~;3.f?Q...~ _______.____ __....~.(?J!. CL~.__ C ~ (J..tJ'- :< ...:t. 00 -
'..t. Lr 00 '- '---
..".-... ..........--,/-...... ... . "..--- ------.- .J --.--------.-."
DOUa"a
.
(:.nt.
U Ad1u.t '.".1' 90- ~ /50'- 93'- ~O~
c1...no..t to
Inda - ---_.~._.._..~.._--------
,,.10. PH' ..oh. tA &0, '- '--- 900 .- 850'- / 500 .- 930.- .5 OJ! - ____
UGUa...
C.nt.
U tnstan trarne .:l CJO- /55- _L~P"':'~_ :J.. 00 ,- /00--
It....l'" 11d 0"
..I.Un, ola.n-
..I
'd.. .... 'aohl .. . ,~ I- I. tJOO'- 'J-lS- g CJ()- /. tJ tJ 0 - 5CJcJ -
,,-- .
DeUar.
c...t..
11 c:u,t..ln .- o.P /, 00(1- 2..1-5 ___ 750- ~ /~.5- ~ 7.23 -
!nt. ad.Uft'
..'far ..In / /JO{)'"
IN.. .u. ,dOli LI 1 '- '- .?]--~=- ....._____.'.n___7-5~=_ J' ~S-- ,,2 ..L2 3 -
..--.---"I-L-___ ---;- ---
Mu.n
Cant.
U a.wa,. lataral/ I 7, 500- / 7;StJO- I ~ $ O.Q~._ / 7': SOt) - U ~oo -
.,ater .a,...,lo.
cont) let J
allovanc. I ~OI2::"- -
~ au. prloal LI I 'J.l..IaI..J.I 'J.l..IaI..J.I ...__......I-Z..!?t?9 -_ /7: 5otJ- /"7; .5 tJO - /? .5 CltJ
......nt.." thou..nd. ---_.__.__.~--._------ ----_._--~
l1.u..h.UIlIUl1 .
Oou."
C.nt.
. U FUoCO"!." .nt LnahU 'J~ 5~ S~ C$ ~~
drop C\lrD -
a,,'" appurta"'''o"
...lca par Un.al' :2 7. O()O- /~. 000- / 'J. a Ot) .,- :::z 3, -1'00, - I '7, ~4'b1-
tOOtl .... ',10' '- '-
DoUar.
c.."t..
.
. CIj/JRt.e:S 6-0L~c-;v' e/'/6Lc JA C I<' A5,PH,q~r Occ?J/V B/'JY
~NSr,4!. VC7/'O,A./
W#/T'cSlD6 JNC. ~(j-. Co~.AlCT~ ,ij/JR2>Y ..TNt:-. Or ?.q~/>? 2l~~ c::::'c"N 517!? QC 77 (J.v 7/V C .
-'''~._'
..
9-' S.~ 9.5 ___n_.._ .... . On ~~_. --1~
11 'urnhh and I n.'.U __-!L~_
t~p. '1' Gurb . - --
.nd ."lIl't'n&no" ,-
Prlc. pn Un.., ., 1_'- 3 ?80'- ..( 415 - ~ -117- .:2 ?- 30 .2 05'S -
'ootl n. .. J. .. ..-...", .__.",. ............. .J.. . ,," "n" .... ." . ....J."...,,,.. .. .-.". ...".....-)-.."........ ..,..-."."1.,,.-.-- ....-..-".".. .......-
15iIli'1"
Canta
S~ ;
JO rurnh" and In.tall 9'- I .5~ 6$ 5"-
l)'l'l' 'D' eur-b ---'-
and .ppuct..nAnc:.. I -
1.3. 8~tJ - g Ll7tJ'- - 9. tCJQ .- ___.
Price pn Un..r <J O{) '1 /tJ tJIO
hot. I Lr 1,141 '_1- ,)....--.--- -.-...--.--..--. ~---
IiiTTi"ra
CanU
9- o .=E2- ,?S ;l-- 1'~
n 'urnhh and In.Ull . ___..........._2.___
ha.d.r ourb Ind --.-......,... --.----.----.---.-. -" -- -.. - -.--.
."urt.nlne.. 50 3 3 rL ~ .:2 ;Z C) & .ft-
'1' 101 p.r Un.n ., ... '- '- 4. lj'f$ -._ 3 CJ,z:z. .- 3 ,:155-
'DOt. I I-----____Jou. " ,... L._.... __.,_.._,.,_...._~_.....J...-.:'n___ ....L-..__,~_.._ .-- ......-....--......--..-....----- ___..=..L__ ._...n.__.,_..__". _..__
Dolln.
e.nU
U "'rn"h and lnehll 30- 5"5- ._... _.____.2__~:_.._ 35 .:}3 5-1 ~._.__
concnh p...,inv at.,... - .-.------.,. --------.-.
..ftd. app,v.rt.l\..ncaa .2-<. 1/~ ~ &0
,rt o. pu .qv.ac-a /9. 350 - 35415 .- 875- 35 .2&~ --
)'..c-III. OY ... I- I- ---.,---- -. j. -----..- -----.------.yIl--. ....... ._'-'~'- ....-. -" ./ ,/. .P. _....._... .___,.___.__._.__':.J..,____._ .____ ..___.._-.l---".._.o_.o.._______ .
IJ.OIUr.
C.nta I ::z...3!-
I 75 Z?5 __.______fi ,~. -----_.j~.~~
.1) raV__ftt .~ --.--.-."..-.------' -..-=-= ---
e.co"atellotlo..
'rie:. p,,, /89;/75- /..2?: 775- __..__...!../f.$~9 () .- _. J'lB, /11.. - 2CJO 4~5 -
.qll..ea ........ IV 11,10' 1- '- --. ~_._..__._- -.:;..J...__,_____
~llan
Cant.
55- 4o.~ 5"S- .-----_.----$":~_:- .. .-
It rur..l_h .nd ____~t2.____._...
1".bU ... .aph.dt ..... -------- u
owu'layand
hveU", coyn. / 7. {;otJ - / :l. I _~t20_~=" ____..__I..Z&-?!.t!..~~..._ / 7. 'l."z () .- /C; (JcJr:) .-
'1' 10. pu ton 1 TON ... '- '- -----_.~ -".-.---- ---....1.--.----.----...---.
a.1U.n
C.nU
.,2- ,?~ ~-f.E- -1-5 ---..---.-./ !!!_....
at Cuorat. 11..walkl -.-..-.-..-.-.... -.... ..-..-.. ....... _' u..___._____L~
....p noon.tuotl.11 ,50 Ig7~ -
'rica pa.. ..".... " 1,n. ,- I- ..2. 5~0- 3,43.Jl- 3. /25- :< /, &?-5
'ootl
DoUan
C.nta ./C!.u~S .m.....___u__ 85'0 _______2~
20- -_/~ - ---. .---
U .ava..nt ra.,,11' 5' c,,;< !f-9-.
'rice pel' 11n.al' ., ... '- '- s. 000 ~ ..< .< /25- ..2 375- ~ 750-
(ootl --,
poUn.
Can".
liS- ___.___ _;<'.7~- . / 'f.S- . .2"<0- _...!..J..~.____. ._
11 Ad1\11\. a""'.\.\1\II -_. ---- _____._n_... ........._._ .,,__._.......~ ----- .-...... -- ...-........
..,,1UI1. to ,ucla "'l ~ tJo - 5. Soo .- 3. 500 .- 4 //00 - ~J 800 -
'1'10. par .Ichl .. ,. 1- '-
~
MlU...
~.
. JI '''rn1ah Ind lndaU d{.?~ ___J ({. .~ ;Ze,g
U. r.l"t.rcell ~L .2 :<_-=-
coneret. plp. .nd
apP'I"tan.ncu
'1"108 p." UMI.I' / 7. .'l..2b- ~O -?()5- /3 735.- 1!3 CJ~tJ.- ..2~ 7&:z.. ~
loot. ., ... 1- '-
DaUa...
c."t. I
at .P\I....hh and In. taU /7~ ..2-1.20 _________dE :~______.__
U. uln(orcad ..23- .2 9 -j
cancrata p.pa and
.ppurhnanc.. -.--. ..... ." ...-." __ _____.____u.. . _. ,,__::-=
I
....te. pal' Uuu I 9 3.:z. 0 .... ...< 71. 3~o - \ /1/,952- ..20 328'- .23.53(; go
.tootl . ., ... '- '- ~
Dollar. )
I
C.nte I
I
:lit ,yrnhh ."d lnataU ____!l:!.(J.: 975-1 9CJo"" ___ . -...---2 <J(!~ --.L 3. 70 -
t1pa Ie' drail\a.a
.tI'YeItur. with UI' ----- -- -- -- --- --,1 .' -"..----..--. -- .v- -~---_.
11100 lnlat
'l'lca ,ar a.at" .. , '- '- G,650'- . C; 8~~-=-t-.--..----_.~.L..} CJ~ C 930 - 9 5'90 -
DoUal'.
Cant. 7'7$:-1 ____ 'l$Q ~
n 'urnbh a... la.td 1 800- 8.;25- /. 3~O-
typ. 'el dral"..a
.tru.ctun wlt.. u., _....--- --.----....--..,-,. _ _h" ,).. ........._________ "..
IUU l"1&t /. <J 9' CJ .-
... loa p.1' a.olll .. . ,- I- I. c;, 00 ~ / '700 .- I} C; 5'0 .- 5. ..Lj~a -
6il:lan
C.n".
n rurnh.. aIM" 1".t.U ~, 500 -. I LlZ3- ~, .z t:Je=.", /. 3 ~5 - :2 5'00""
type ttl dralna...
.tnetlln vlth us, ___L-_.. ______. .-- --_.--.~._"'..-. .,.--. _.~_..---------,,_.. "
Inu Inlet
Pl'1ca par aao... .. . / SOO~ /. 47-5- /~... 1 3"?S- It) OOtJ -
I' '- ,-
Dollar.
eMU ~
U "'r"hll and In.taU ~ 45tJ'- .-:' 7:r 5 ___ __.......L)-S t:>(J_=. /, "3;2.CJ'- ___.__._d??2.=-_.__.._
typa 'rl dral"...
.truchea wit" UtI ..-.----t-=,---.----.
lulO lnl.t '-:1
.d.. par ..aIll .. I ,- 1.450 .- ./. r 75- /, ..3 t::J CJ - 1,3:<0 - .250-
.---.j
Doll....
C."ta
U hr.."" .M '"atall /. /MLJ- --L, ;; 75 - 9.s; .- ______6..PL_~_=. /. .2 8.5-
dul"... .."h.1a .nIl ~_...n____ __ ..."''''..____.____?t:2....__ ----J-------. -.---
a"Ul""a_ftCl.. 4 DIN} - 5. IC/tJ- '.3 gCJO .-
...loe pa.. ...... .. . I- I- 4, 3tJO - ;2. 5'::ra - . ".
DoU.r. .'
Ca.". I
/ GOO'- L570 ..- .'" .. _ _____43CJCJ . :-:- / ~5o - ;Z CJ?O-
U '"..nhlli .n4 In.t"l
conUlct ..Rho.. ______).. ... """,.n_'_ -- ----- -i-=----- . ... '" . . ._.. _.__u,,_____..__n~_.._'" ._..___ -- --)-- .----.--.'"
and appurt.nanc.. 6 4oC/- &otJ .-
p..LCa par ..clll .. . 1--,- 1- ~ 3&0 .- S:.:< otJ - ~ .2.0 9t:J'-
Do&1....
. c...u
J' In..rt dralr,a,. I,) 7t2t!.=. .1. -975- /, 3o..Q~_ ~ ?~O'- . 2.0 lj 0. -
IIIlI'Inhnh Int.o
ul.tl", atol'. ----.-J- --. . "'''''' ....
tlnl..
'I'le. "1' ....., . .. I ,- I- I 10iJ - .2 .LJI7.s- ~I 3tJeJ ~ /, 7&>0 - ;2 ~~O -
naIl...
.
.' -
1
..
. GoL'bB'7/ e-/lC-LtT ,:JACk' AS'P#/JL-"/ e>C6;;l7/V /3/JY
C .H'ARt CS CONS' r.etlC77~"l/
WH/TE5"/DO; .liVe. G?l6. CoNmAC7lMZ> //ARD)j .INC. OF l?1P'? &770'1 C"~->?""i2C1CrzP7VJNC .
~
n COMlot drallWl,. -- Sa?- Ii'S - 500- ______-t.f!C?::-:-_ ~S'O-
pip. to .I(htlnq .... ... .. ~._-_.._- .._- .-.". -... ..... .. .----..---------...- ,-' -.. '_0- __. .. .. _,.____,.. ...__ ____. __... __
unholl'ehuohr. /J' 000 ~ 880- 500"-
.dea pilI' ..olu .. , '- '- /. ootJ'- 350-
OGUan
C.nt.
I
" Connlct '1'Iln.,. __.Lt50~ I ___,,___ ____/.35.-:. _.____~~(Z.~_ _n_'_._ -94c:J- ___.....g. 5 0 ~
pip. to uhtlftCj
lIulno". plpa Lj 50 ,- /35- 500'- ~4t:J ~ ;250 ,-
,,.lel pel' laclu .. i I- I- -.
DoU....
C.nt..
U .,IIOV. ..htint S;OOO .- :z 900'- _..._~ 1-. 5"'30 ..... /~,t:JtJtJ .- / OOtJ'-
dulna,. pip. .nd , --=+--.-- ---:>"-"'-------.--. -- .
I\&'UO'''I'I' /0
WI' Ill. pl'h., LI i 1- 1_- 5 oocr 2. 900'- 'J: 530'- tJoo .- I; 000'-
Dolin.
C.nU
40 'urnh" Ind jn.td1 GO- _._______.20C) .- . .2:<0'- -.-. -----.--- ---~~::.- ______./.6f2__=._
. t....d J Il)ftt Ill' -
pl,Ill boll.. ..mil -- "l ...
'PPl,I..t.".nca. ), B()O .--
Pdaa p,,, ..ahl .. II I- I- 90tJ.- 3) (Jot) - 3, .300 - 8,'1..5-
DoJ,.n
C.nt.
S-- 70 c,g!. 5$ ____02. ~__:
41 h..nl... .I\d in,t.u --~
J- ,ve oondl,llt .nd
Ippllrtln.nca.
423 415- s-: ~/CJ - 4. ~?-5 - -
.ric. pa.. 111,.... /j ..25() - :2.320
foo\1 Lr ... I- I-
, DoU.'"
C.nt..
I;2S ?() _ .u_.______L.4!. /~ . 3D
n h..".... 'M lA.Ull ().- _..._.______J2_= ,,___
__.+H__. .. _" .,__ ..J__._... _
..a4i add ."loh
150- 5" 10 - 9 6tJ - 8/0 - /8tJ -
...Ic. pa.. ..u....
v.rell IV ... I--=--- 1-
DoUan
c."t.
3- 3!7 /~ /E ..l. .50 '.
n 'l,Irnhh .... !n.Ull ____. ___u"..- L - . ---- ...!._~-_._.,
'" ---~ _..-..
.rle. pI" ..".... /. 050 - 7-1..2 .~_ . 9&,2~ 7-.L;t.2, ~ $;2.5-
V"III IV n. 1- 1_-
1iitTi1"
c...t. ..23.JtJtJ - .2 0 .500 .- __ u_.__~~-CJO - _J C{ tJ 1-1 --=_ ~ 2.80 ,.....
__=.L__.m.._.___
... ,..., UIIiI c.ntrol _>'- ",,______h__..."
lMa, au. priell LI I ,- I- ;23 / CJt) - .20. 5tJo .- 5.da:;;- /tJ,oI1- -2;..;2. 80 ..- ,
J -----
Dollu.
C.nU __1;.SOO - ? 500'- _. _?~500-- ;t, 5"00- Z-500 r
----.--7- " . .." .m --.-.-.
U Tllt.l", .Uov.na. 7- 500 .- - - ------.-.--..---
&AI.. .". pl'lca. LI i I~ '....L1Jl4U r 500-- 1-. 50CJ~ ~. 500'- '1: .5tJ (') .-
IQlL,llllu...nd , l v.
bl,lJ\liuQ.
DoUan
~... '.
M> ~ 500 ~
C.nh ~ 500'- -.2 500- ______-t...~r2.t?~_ _-1..)-.500 ..-
- ~---------- -.--.. ~._..--..._--
U VI,ao Ulov.nca .t;'t't? -
IoU., au. pt leI' LI I I~ I--L.J.RL.U ~ -1'500 ~ 41. 5t:JO'- ..y, 5",(JO'- 4:; SOO'-
.; ~-
loIIUlwIuolL.I..IJls
h)lNtr.d '"
DoU....
..
e.nt. . '
..---- /0- /CJ'- -La..~ /0- -
-- ___.__!.._tZ..__.___._ ._
n JRCle"'U'.Io.al,. -......-'---
Lua, .u. p,'l... LI , '---..lLd ItJ - /0- /0- / t:J .- /Cl ....
1---..lLd "
Doll11'1
".
C.nt. ~7.s
.. ",.olla .lllatA", :3- - - .. . __.. _____.__ _I..? .-.--....- ----.$.~ -----~--
"ph..lt .nd D... ...---,...~'...._._- -. _._-~._..._.".---_.._.-. -.::::::.
'rlcllll P'" .qu.... / 8 ocr- .2 Z3so- 7' cJCJ ,- ..2 I tJo .- /J:2cJO"'-
VUd' If 101.,_ 1-
-
Uoih...
Ca"h .. ___.________.l. ~
.. ''',,,l.h and tn.tlU /5...=. 7--=_ ____15~__ _._ __ .:<<2::"".__ _.._ .'
,t.opaoLl. --_..-._-
'It laa pi.. aubla ,2 /ot> -- J 7.5- __.____JJz..C! - / tJo .-
Vue" CU ... I- I- .:2 2, Boo --
_. - - T
Dolhn
C.nU .30
I. ""rnlah and 1I,.ta II 2.-::". .2~ __.____._.d.~ rs
eoner.t.. ald."alk. -_.__....,_...~ _..___0_._.- _ _______~_ ____L~ __L.~________.
'1' 10' p,,, .q...r. .2. o t!)(}-- 2 500- /. ;Z5CJ- ~30 0 .-
lootl " 1,101 I- I- 2. 500-
-
Doll....
t;.nl.
/ $'...-: . ..-.--------. ./~~ ._ . .__n_._ /cJ~ ...__________ __/;2 - .-
" ,u..lth" aMi ....tall .-.- _______ _____L.t? ___. _ ".... ..
oone...t. "'....1 atop'
,..Ie. p,,, .aclu .. .. '- 1_- 60GJ .- ~OO'- f/.2.0 .- -f/fJ 0 - .// tJ/} .-
DoU.,-.
Cant. 2~a_-:-" ,.,.<- OtJO - .500 .:J3
._.----_._.-~~P - /, 050'-- ,",
n ....u... ~t .tr 1,1", -----'---.-.J . ----S-OO .~ _ ---- J..m. ..... ..... --
a.u.. ,\111 pd... LI , '- 1_..- '1 CJtJ .- :2 CJOO - d~tJ - /. tJ 50"-
,
Dcua.... '.
C.nt.
n '..ov. and upl.c. . . ____1.:.._ 8~5_ 9- 1- ----------_./ -=-----..
'tVpa "I ~"C'.. aM
,uH... ---.-----.-.. -~... .-......- ..__u_. ..._.... ___._ ._,
Prie. pa.. U"'.r / >1/'16'- / &50 - ~ &OQ_.-:-_ /,8tJe;- .:2. 00 -
100\1 L, n. I- I-
- -
DoU....
ClnU . ,
'Ioh' Inh.ahd Il. I {;_i4 7 ~ D.- 5"81089 - L/83 '771 - Gli8, <J89.~ (;3C S5~.~
11. na.. 1 thl'o"," '3 Un .........1
'1otal Iy.luatad I.'
Ibl It... 1 \"I'IM&," '3 (1.. Wi'll.. DoU....
C4lnl.
.,; '.
.
.
~
Agenda I tem No. :
AGENDA REQUEST
Date: April 8, 1992
Request to be placed on:'
XX Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda
When: April 14. 1992
Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much): Bid Award -
Gulfstream Boulevard - Irrigation Beautification Project.
ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO
Recommendation: Award to low bidder, Windmill Sprinkler Company, at a total
of $13,472.50
!
, jj{M) ~~L
Department Head Signature:
Deteraination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable):
Budget Director Review (required on all iteas involving expenditure
of funds):
Funding available: ~/ NO
Funding alternatives: (if applicable)
Account No. & Description: -3?3-4W-SI2...~I-~~ ElULF5Jl?E.AM 'PLVD.
Account Balance: ~,oro
City Manager Review:
Approved for agenda: @/ NO !!r\
Hold Until:
Agenda Coordinator Review:
Received:
Action: Approved/Disapproved
1i<I.. ..",
'.
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
THROUGH: Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager/
Administrative Services~
FROM: Ted Glas, Purchasing Officer tjff
DATE: April 8, 1992
SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING -
APRIL 14,1992 - BID AWARD - # 92-31
GULFSTREAM BOULEVARD - IRRIGATION
Item Before City Commission:
The City Commission is requested to award a contract to the low
bidder, Windmill Sprinkler Company, at a total cost of $13,472.50.
Per the Finance Department, funding is from:
( ) .
Background:
Funds were allocated in the FY 91-92 budget for irrigation of
Gulfstream Boulevard. A total of $ is budgeted for
this proj ecL
Scope of Service - Installation of an irrigation system to provide
coverage to the landscaping on the median on Gulfstream Boulevard
(between Seacrest Boulevard and Dixie Highway).
Bids for this project were received on March 27, 1992 from four (4)
contractors, all in accordance with City purchasing procedures. (Bid
II 92-31. Documentation on file in the Purchasing Office.) A
tabulation of bids is attached for your review.
The City Horticulturist/Special Projects Coordinator has reviewed the
bids, and recommends award to the low bidder Windmill Sprinkler
Company, per attached memo.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends award to the low bidder, Windmill Sprinkler Company,
at a total cost of $13,472.50. Funding as outlined above.
Attachments:
Tabulation of Bids
Recommendation from Community Improvement
pc: Lula Butler
Nancy Davila
'.. ",,'
.
.
MEMORANDUM
To: Ted Glas, Purchasing Administrator
From: Nancy Davila, Horticulturist/Special Projects Coordinator ~~
Re: RECOMME~DATION FOR AWARD OF BID #92-31
GULFSTREAM BOULEVARD IRRIGATION
Date: April 8, 1992
I have reviewed the bids received for the installation of the irrigation
system for Gulfstream Boulevard and recommend that the bid be awarded to the
lowest bidder, Windmill Sprinkler Company, Inc. , in the amount of
$13,472.50.
All references contacted were pleased with the performance of Windmill and
indicated that they would use them again. Since Windmill did not specify
some of the items in the miscellaneous category that other prospective
bidders listed, I verified with Windmill that this price does include. the
slab for the pump, the 2" sleeves specified in .addendum II 1, and it does
include the FPL hook-up charges.
__;Ji
1.'1t
'.
, -
.. -
I-< 3:
.... .... .... .... -.0 co -..J 0"- l/1 -I'> VI N .... ~ 1>
VI N .... 0 . :ll:f'T'I ::0
3: ()
I
VlN ....N Vi.... Vi.... ........ O"-Vi N.... ....::0 ::0::0 ,-..::c ....::0 ....::0 -1'>::0 0 N
0"- l/1 : -I'> 0 : . , 1> ()1> -..J1> -..J1> l/11> l/11> f'T'I -..J
l/1.... 0 0.... Vi.... f'T'I-I'> f'T'I.... f'T'Il-< II-< 0::0 -1'>1-< I-< I-< Ul .
, Ul , rUl -.0' 1> : 1>' 1>Z f-Z 00 Z <Z f'T'IZ ()
rN rr rN r l/1 ~J () ()N () NCO II-< f'T'ICO 1> CO 1> CO ::0 f-
: f'T'I : "Tlf'T'l : II I : I() 0"-1-< f-f'T'I 1>1-< ZI-< ()I-< I-< -.0
"Tl "Tlf'T'l "Tl ~f'T'I r 0 r 0::0 '-" ()::o ::0 I::O "'0 -.0
~Ul ~< ~Ul < "'0 Ul G'! I-< COO f'T'I IO 10 0 ~ N
r f'T'I r f'T'I "Tl< f'T'I 1> () r I-<
f'T'I f'T'I ~() ~ ;:><: I() f-f'T'I .... ....f- .... 0
f'T'I f'T'I CO f'T'I 0 ....() CO ....CO -I'> Z
< < 3: I-< ....Z 0 .... 0
f'T'I f'T'I 1> CO < ~ f'T'I< -I'> f'T'I ~J N
I-< CO 1> f'T'I::O 1>1> I 1>1
Z r 1>0 ()r .... ()
< ()r I< l/1 I
f'T'I Ir f'T'I I
f'T'I
::0
-.IN N.... W.... N' .... .... a-..... \.I'IN -.J-.J WW .... .... N.... NN ..,....... n~
w' N' ..,... N-.J ~ . 00 0\.1'1 \.1'1\.1'1 00 ~ 0 ~ \.1'1 NO \.1'10 0""
00 \.1'1\.1'1 00 . \.1'1 WO . . . . . . 00 .....0 ,a-. . o' O' . ;:I
. 0 . 0 . 0 \.1'1 \DO 00 00 00 . . O' .....0 oig . 0 Q.
0 0 0 0...... \.1'1 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ~~,
0...... 0...... 0...... . ...... 00 . 0 . 0 0
0 ...... ...... ...... 0 0...... ...... ...... n~
0 ...... 0...... 0 .~
I:Il
'tl
11
",.
~
~ G'!
~
11 C
r
."
1~ Ul
\.1'1 ..... W, N' ..... . \D . .....N \.I'IN \.1'1\.1'1 ..,....,.. a-. a-. WN NN \DN ~ ()
..... . \DCl:! o a-. w..,.. -.J-.J NO 0\.1'1 00 \D\D a-. 0 ..,..0 \.I'IW 00 ::0 I-<
.......,.. a-. 0 ..,..0 . \.1'1 a-. 0 O' . . . . \.1'1\.1'1 O' Cl:!' W. O' f'T'I ~~
. 0 . . \.1'1 . . 0 00 00 . , , 0 00 . 0 . 0 ~ ",.
0 0...... 0...... 0...... \.1'1 ...... 00 00 00 00 00 . 0 00 00 ~Q. 1> 1>-<
0...... 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 ",. III 3: CO
...... ...... ...... ...... 0...... ...... ...... CO
II- ...... g ~ COcor"Tl
...... 01-<1>
'"" rn
0 ",. CO~O
11 t~ r I-<f'T'I
..,.. f'T'I:ll:Or
<-.oz::o
\D 1>N 1>
\.1'1 ::010-<
'"" OVi"Tl
/"t .... CO
..... I COf'T'l
0'1..... ';{ 1-<1>
a-..... ...... ..... ...... . :z= ..... ..... ...... ..... W..... ..... ..... \.1'1\.1'1 a-. a-. N..... ...... ..... I-< O()
Cl:! . \.1'1' .....\D 0 ~ . ~\.I'I -.JCl:! .... ..... NN a-. 0 ~ \.1'1 ~Cl:! OW .... ::0 UlI
a-.:IO W\.I'I ..,.. \.1'1..... /"t' . . NN \.1'1\.1'1 o' a-.. /"t. -.J. 'tl ::0
. :10 \.1'10 ..... t:d -.JW '<l 0 \.I'I-.J . . . . . 0 .....0 '<l0 . \.1'1 ~
N ............ "'. a-. . 0 0\.1'1 \.1'1\.1'1 00 00 00 . 0 \.1'10 ~ I-<
0...... '"" ...... ..,.. Q. . ...... 00 00 0 . 0 G'!
/"t :N W 0...... ...... ...... 0...... 0...... ...... > 1>
'00 ..... \.1'1 '"" ...... ...... 0 '"" ~
.....0 I..... -.J N ~
N . \.1'1\.1'1 ..... ..... 11 I-<
. N \.1'1 ..... . Na-. 11 0
\.1'1 NO 0 ..... . ",. Z
0 \.1'1 0 0 OQ
0 III
'"" /"t
/"t ",.
. 0
..... ;:I
.....W ""'N a-.N w..... ..... . wa-. .....-.J ..,....,.. WW ....\D w..... NN \DN ~
~ . W. :10' O' .....>;iO a-...... ..,....... 00 Cl:!oo o a-. .....00 \.I'IW 00 n
N..,.. \.I'I\D 00 . 0 .....0 a-. . N' . . a-. a-. \.1'1' W. W. o' 0
~o . 0 . 0 00 a-. . 0 . 0 00 . . a-. 0 NO . 0 . 0 '<l
..... 0 0 0 . ...... 00 00 00 00 . 0 . 0 00 00
. ...... 0...... 0...... ...... 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 ~
0 0 ...... ...... ...... 0...... 0...... ...... ...... 11
0 ...... 11
....
OQ
III
/"t
",.
g
~
;:I
n
.
,..,.
"
. ' . .
...
0 G) f-' f-' f-' f-' H "'0 -i
0 ;.0 -...J ()\ Ln ~ :ll:-i I> I>
3: I> iTl G) CO
3: Z 3: iTl C
iTl 0 r
Z '-"3: r"'O rO NO 0 N I>
-i -i (/)H CC CO ()\"'O iTl -i
(/) 0 "'O(/) 3:3: 3:Z NiTl (/) H
....... -i iTlO "'0"'0 "'O-i Z 0 0
iTl I> OiTl ;.0 r ;.0 Z
X r Hr (/)(/) (/)0 0 H
0 "r C-i Cr "C "'0 0
iTl CO -<I> 3: I> ::I -i-i -i "
"'0 H ......Z -i ~ H
-i 0 iTl H H 0 CO
H 0 0 ;.0 Z H
0 I C Z iTl 0
Z (/) (/)
(/) r
.. C 0
3: 0
"'0 Z
-i
(/)
C
::I
~no> I'1El * .... ~ N <1.-.. Nf-' ~~
~ .." n I'll 0 ~ w ~. H w 0 1:1
crm tr ~"'I"..l ... I'll ~ ~~ 0'1 . ~~
~cr> ~o = I"..l n N NO
,..,o.~'<I1'1 w ,., \.II I'll ~ 00
"'I'llo. w:C ~ 1'1 . m = .
,., 1'1 I'll ~ I'll I'll " 00 ..' 0 0. 0..... ~
I'll 41:1 I'll 1:1 m ~ N \.IIn 0 ~ I'll 0
o.mo.o. n ,., ~ , O~ ~ 0. tn
~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ w \.II . ~ * 'C:l
o 1'1 0 0 ..' ~ 1'1
m;:r 0. m ,., I"..l 01 ..,
I'll .... = I'll 1:1 ,., ~
m n ... 1'1 1'1 1'1 ~ I:l"
= l"t I'll I'll w ~ ~
1'1 n w .., I'll
I'll I'll 1:1 1'1
,., .., I'll
'<I 'C:l ......
,.,
~ I:C o > ..' N H>'Ij
.... I:C ~ N 0'1 ...~ 1'1~
m ..' .."n m = 0 ~ w 0 w , 1'1 0
0. >tr ... 1:1 I'll 00 0 00 ~'1'1
~ == 'C:l tn \.II ~o.Nn ~ , ~O ..'
0.0 I'll ~ w ~ 1-'0 w ,., \.II 0 00 ~o.
1'1 0 0.( 1'1 I'll ... ...:1 ... 1'1 , 0 . ..... ,.,~
I'll 1:1 I'll ~ I'll ~ . oq 01-'0 0 0 ..'
,., 0. :l I'll ~ <I I"..l ::;) on 0 0 o t:l
'<I 0.0. 0. I'll . 01 , 1:1 I'll
~ ~~ 0. 0 01 m
I'll'o 0 0 H ..'
cr 0. 5.4 ~~
~, ....
...1'1 = .
,., I'll El 4
,., n m
I'll I'll ....
0. ..' ...
~ .
~ I:C 0 > .... >'Ij :zl ~ n ~ N .-.. . .-.. 0'1 >-i
m 1-'0 .." n . .... 0 w ... ... I"..l . 1'1
0. !r ... '"I:l ~ ~ ~ .Il- N ~ 00 ..'
0'1 . n .." " w \.110 'C:l
~ I:C t. ~ w N 00"'''''''...1'11"..l1'll \.II \.II ..... ~
1'1 0 0. 0 O~OI'1\.111-'o\.llI'llO'l . 0 .." ..... I'll
I'll:l I'll I-' 0'1 o ol-'oono,.,ol:C 0 0'" ,.,
,., 0. :l I'll 0 . t'""I. n. . I'D' 0 0 w . ... >
'<I 0. 0. . o'o~ono OM .."I"..l '-" w
~ ~ ~ 0 o o~ooomo ,.,,, 00 H
\.II >'Ij :l~... . \.II I"..l 1'1
cr 0. ~ 5' ~ ~ 0'1 '-" . 0 1'1
I!. ~ 1'1 0 . ...
o 0 '!l 0 0 oq
,., I'll I a' ~ I 0 III
,., n N ,.,
I'll I'll 'C:l I N 1-'0
0. ~ . 0
I \.II :I
,., 0
m~o> .... cr.." I'll 0.0l ~n I'll cr'C:llll N ... I"..l... if
= .." n 0"-' ....." "-'rt '-',.Q"-'l'D"-' w w w N n
cr m !r ... :I III '"I:l = 1'1 00 N ... . 0
\D o.'"I:l"':zl.ll-'"I:l"':o:l~I-'otn I'll N N .Il-O '<I
~,il~~ w IlIw 1-'01'11-'0 'C:lI-'DlM 0 ... .Il-O
"'I'llo. 00 1~I"..lI'llOI'llO~~El~o.'" , . . H
,., 1'1 I'll ~ \D on, m:l I'll 0.1'1 0 0 0..... 1'1
I'll 41:1 I'll 0 .Il-I'llo,.,om Hi'll 1:1 I'll III 0 0 0 1'1
o.m>::l..o. , ":1'1'10= '"I:l"''''..,,1:I ..'
Dln~~ 0 \.11"'01-'0 I'1l"..ltn.., Oo.N oq
0 . on I'll... n 1'1~= III
m;:r 0. 0'C:l III 0.." N ,.,
I'll .... o I'll ~ ,." 0 Ol 0'C:l rn ..'
rnn...1'1 1'1 1'll01'1"'OiN~ 0
= l"t I'll .." ( 010 Ill' ~I'll :I
1'1 n o 0 ,., '1:l 1'1 0 I"..ll'll
I'll I'll i 1'1 ..' i'" 0 . <I H
,., .., l"t 1:1 I'll ~ 0 I'll :I
'<I '1:l oq 1'1 0 n
,., :l III ,
n rn --
..
I,,"
'.
-
MEMORANDUM
- -
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM :It 9A - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
REPORT OF APPEALABLE LAND USE ITEMS
DATE: April 10, 1992
This item is before you for acceptance of the report of decisions
made by the various development related boards during the period
March 23, 1992 through April 10, 1992. The following actions were
considered during this reporting period:
Planning and Zoning Board did not consider any appealable land
use items during this reporting period.
Site Plan Review and Appearance Board:
-Approved the architectural elevations (awning additions)
at Shoney's Restaurant.
-Approved the architectural elevations and landscape plans
associated with new model additions at Sherwood Forest.
-Approved the architectural elevations and landscape plans
in conjunction with a 688 square foot building addition to
Cason United Methodist Church.
Historic Preservation Board:
-Granted a Certificate of Appropriateness in conjunction
with the construction of a planter box on the west facade
for Renaissance Dental Studio.
-Granted a Certificate of Appropriateness for a color
change to the building awnings for the Boyd Building.
A detailed staff report is attached as backup material for this item.
, .
"
~
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: QD T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
V O~J ~C~c<:.~/
THRU: .... D)w-ID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
!::In",-- ~
FROM: JASMIN ALLEN, PLANNER I
SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1992
REPORT OF APPEALABLE LAND USE ITEMS
MARCH 23, 1992 THRU APRIL 10, 1992
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
review of appealable actions which were made by various
Boards during the period of March 23, 1992, through April
10, 1992.
BACKGROUND:
This is the method of informing the City Commission of land use
actions, taken by designated Boards, which may be appealed by the
City Commission. After this meeting, the appeal period shall
expire (unless the 10 day minimum has not occurred).
Section 2.4.7(E) of the LDRs applies. In summary, it provides
that the City Commission hears appeals of actions taken by an
approving Board. It also provides that the City Commission may
file an appeal. To do so:
1. The item must be raised by a City Commission member.
2. By motion, an action must be taken to place the item on
the next meeting of the Commission as an appealed item.
M'
'.
.
City Commission Documentation
Report of Appealable Land Use Items
March 23, 1992 thru April 10, 1992
Page 2
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING OF MARCH 26, 1992
No appealable items were considered by he Board. However, the
following agenda items which were considered by the Board will
be forwarded to the City Commission as a separate agenda items
* Plan Amendment 92-1; Future Land Use Map Amendments;
Associated Rezonings; Policy and Text Amendments.
* LDR Amendment re "The Newsrack Ordinance"
SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPEARANCE BOARD (SPRAB) MEETING OF APRIL
1, 1992:
1- Approved the architectural elevations (awning additions)
at Shoney's, located on the north side of SE 10th Street,
between the Federal Highway pairs (Vote 6 to 0).
2. Approved the architectural elevations and landscape plans
associated with new model additions at Sherwood Forest,
located south of Atlantic Avenue, west of the Hamlet
Subdivision (Vote 7 to 0).
3. Approved the architectural elevations and landscape plans
in conjunction with a 688 sq. ft. building addition at
Cason United Methodist Church, located at the southwest
corner of Lake Ida Road and Swinton Avenue. The site plan
was approved as a non-impacting modification (Vote 7 to 0).
No other appealable items were considered by the Board. However,
the following agenda item required Board action:
* Approved the business sign for Top Dog, located at 1601 SW
10th Street.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD (HPB) MEETING OF APRIL 1, 1992
1- Granted a Certificate of Appropriateness in conjunction
with the construction of a planter box on the west facade
for Renaissance Dental Studio at the northeast corner of NE
2nd Avenue and 5th Street (Vote 7 to 0).
2. Granted a Certificate of Appropriateness for a color change
to the building awnings for the Boyd Building, located
south of Atlantic Avenue, between the Intracoastal Waterway
and Palm Square (Vote 4 to 3).
.
.
.
City Commission Documentation
Report of Appealable Land Use Items
March 23, 1992 thru April 10, 1992
Page 3
No other appealable items were considered by the Board. However,
the following agenda item required Board action:
* Certificate of Appropriateness in conjunction with
construction of a single family residence at 310 BE 7th
Avenue.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, receive and file this report.
Attachments: Location Map
JA/Y/CCAPPEAL.TXT
,..
,.
.. ,. ..
LOCATION MAP FOR
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
OF APRIL 14. 1992
L-.JCI CAIW.
WCE IDA ROAD
I
J I
@ SWZST
~ ~
I ! . .
II II
I
LOWSON IOULEYAIID
I
UMTON IOULEYAIID I
o~
~
L-JI CANAL
S.P.R.A.B. ITEMS:
1. - SHONEY'S
N 2. - SHERWOOD rOREST
3. - CASON WETHODIST CHURCH
- H.P .B. ITEMS:
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA A. - RENAISANCE DENTAL STUDIO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT B. - BOYD BUILDING
1<;"
,.
. .
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER or1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM it Ll · 13. - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
APPEAL OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD DECISION/310 N.
SWINTON AVENUE
DATE: April 10, 1992
We have received an appeal of the Historic Preservation Board
decision denying a six foot chain link fence and driveway gates at a
single family residence located at 310 N. Swinton Avenue, in.the Old
School Square Historic District. The applicant constructed this
fence and driveway gates without a building permit and Certificate of
Appropriateness.
Pursuant to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, chain link
fences are inappropriate with Historic Districts.
At their March 18th meeting the Historic Preservation Board
considered the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for
the fence. A motion to deny the COA did not pass on a 2-2 vote.
The Board then approved a motion to modify the COA and allow the side
portions of the fence to remain; but to require that a four foot high
wood fence and gates be installed by a 4-0 vote.
The applicant feels that removal of the six foot chain link fence and
replacing it with a four foot wooden fence would not provide the
security that he needs; and thus has submitted an appeal of that
decision. Additionally, the applicant has indicated that he is
willing to cover the front portion of the fence with wood in order to
meet appearance criteria.
Alternative actions are fully described in the Director's Report, a
copy of which is attached as backup material for this item. Briefly
they include:
a) reject the appeal and remand to the Historic Preservation
Board
b) overrule the Historic Preservation Board and allow the
existing s~tuation to remain
c) overrule the Historic Preservation Board but require some
mitigation
Recommend consideration of an appeal from the property owner at 310
N. Swinton Avenue.
.,
'"
, .
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: D T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
~~~
FROM: D. VACS, DIRECTO
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1992
CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF HPB ACTION
PERTAINING TO A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS IN
THE OLD SCHOOL SQUARE HISTORIC DISTRICT
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
reversal of the Historic Preservation Boardls (HPB)
decision to deny a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)
to allow a six foot high chain link fence and driveway
gates at a single family residence located at 310 N.
Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District.
The appeal has been filed by the applicant, Dean
Hoffman, owner of the property.
BACKGROUND:
In February of this year, a six foot high chain link fence
and double chain link driveway gates were installed at this
single family residence without a building permit and
without COA approval (note: the fencing along the north
property line existed previously; the illegal fencing runs
parallel to Swinton). (See an attached exhibit for the
location of the fencing.) The applicant was cited by Code
Enforcement for construction without a permit. He then
proceeded through the review process.
Pursuant to our Design Guidelines (excerpt attached), chain
link are deemed "inappropriate for any historic site". The
design guidelines do allow for use of green stained chain
link with complimentary hedging in rear yards, not visible
from the streetscape".
This site has been designated as "contributing" (per OSSHAD
Designation Report).
.,
..
'City'Commission Documentation
Appeal of HPB Action
COA in the Old School Square Historic District
Page 2
The applicant went before HPB at its meeting of March 18,
1992. The alternative actions presented to the Board
included:
( 1 ) Deny the application and require that the front fence
and gates be removed (side fencing would remain since
it was previously existing), or
(2 ) Approve the COA with the following modifications:
( A) Cover the chain link front fence and gates with
wood facing;
(B) Paint the wood facing, color to be specified by
HPB;
(C) Require that appropriate landscaping be planted
and maintained in front of the fence.
The Board first had a motion to deny the COA and require
that the fence be removed. The vote was 2-2. A new motion
called for allowing only a four foot high, wood fence, with
gates parallel to Swinton. This motion passed on a 4-0
vote.
BASIS OF APPEAL:
The appeal letter (copy attached) cites the following
reasons as a basis for the appeal:
( 1 ) A front fence six feet in height has been allowed in
the Old School Square Historic District - reference
Ann's Dog Grooming.
( 2 ) For security purposes a six foot high fence instead of
a four foot high fence is needed.
( 3) The applicant is willing to provide wood facing for the
fence and gates.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS:
Apparently, at the HPB meeting there was discussion about
the height of fencing. There is a proposal that fencing be
limited to four feet high in front yards. In that the
location of this fence is more than 601 from the street, it
would not be considered as being a front yard fence.
The fence at Ann's Dog Grooming is a wood fence (as opposed
to chain link).
It is normally inappropriate to act on a Board created
modification without the applicant's consent to the
modification.
.,
..
City'Commission Documentation
Appeal of HPB Action
COA in the Old School Square Historic District
Page 3
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
( 1 ) Overrule the HPB action (of denial of the request) and
allow the chain link fence to remain as existing.
( 2 ) Uphold the HPB action of "non-approval" (thus, no COA
is to be issued) and direct the applicant back to HPB
if he desires to pursue alternative fencing.
( 3) After consultation with the applicant, determine if he
wishes to modify the application to either of the
following (or some other alternative):
(a) (Design Guideline Solution): installation of wood
facing on the front of the chain link fence and
gates, with the following provisions:
* that the wood facing is painted white to
match the house, and
* that appropriate landscaping be planted and
maintained in front of the fence.
(b) (New Material Solution): removal of the chain
link and install a 6' high wood fence, painted to
match the house.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Commission discretion.
Attachments:
* Appeal Letter
* Design Guideline Excerpt
* Survey
* Photographs
,
'.
.
TO: City of Delray Beach
FROM: Dean A. Hoffman
310 North Swinton Ave.
Delray Beach. Florida 33444
SUBJECT: Appealing the decision of the Preservation Board of the
O.S.S.H.A.D.. Refusing a permit to construct a 6 FT chain
link fence.
This fence that is being appealed is attached to an existing fence, that runs
along the souths ide of my home. The fence is mainly for security
purposes, and a determent to neigtlbofltood.crilJl~.
While attending the meeting, the boara wa~ a~je8able to thl.5 untili. a one
person a Cecil (Sandy) Jameson came up wi l [1 d. 6 1 t . fence would se t prececlellt 11
the future.
upon investigation I found that a 6 ft. fence nad been l.nstalled at 302 :\l.E. J r c
Streel-,', This iSh8 Place of p..ussiness that is called Ann's Grooming. ltus rence
. ch.a...H ~. t'.i8 - e'! c. AI €,JW h 6 f wooden gate HIS taIled on a chair. ll.lIk
1 S n 1 3. t 19 g as at.
gate, with the chain linK facing the outside or N.E. 1 S t Ave.
All the board offered me was a 4 ft.wooden fence across the
side of my home going north to the south corner post. The board agreed that
the 6ft. chain link fence that I installed going from that corner post going
west to the existing 6ft. chain link fence was approved by the board.
I have agreed to cover the front with wooo to Keep tne appearance
that the O.S.S.H.A.D. wants. The 4ft. fence that the board will approve
wot:.lcl not provide me the security that 1 nbed. ~ly houso nas l:JIOKen l. [1 to twice,
8.nel I cannot keep nothing nice. like lawn chal.fs and other valuables in my back
yarcl. With th.i s highe r fence it would be a lot harder to throw things over the
fence. The surveyors plans are WIth Pat l.ayct:: ilt elt)' 11&.1.i..
Sincerely
RECEIVED
<3 /a/ /9~ Dean A. Hoffman
cnv CLERK
'.
..
'-0
'T
~ ~
0 '"'
0 t::
S 0
c: 2:
s ::l
"" '",
V'l .~
1:Jvi~
c:--
"" c: 'S
. '"' c:
...::cE~
.\:: '"' ::l
'-Cio
-0<1)-0
1l'~ '0
.S .~ ~ 0.0
a2t.S
(lJ'~ - ~
.".:::..r:: ~ '"'
..r:: '"' --
s - "" -
.!:!!..r:: <1)
-' Q'".::: 'D
..r:: 0 s.-
tlll,-",o..
'-': 0..'-': ~
...::c o..Ci_
v "" '- ::l
.Q~-;~
-0 ::l 0 :::
, -0 0 '-
~ '5 ~ ~
- c: <( '_
tlll 0 '. t;
<(~E~
o..\::2~
0:::0>--
h~CO-O
-, '-0 -0 >- >- Q) Q) -0 C1;l Q) b.OO ~- . -
C1;l U -0 Q) Q)c~...c...c 0 UC_b.OC1;l <I'l U
.... Q) Q)
C Q) C .... ....... ra ....... ....... ....... .:; :J C '- Q).S ~ U ....
O-oC1;l.... .S .... C E...c t Q) - C1;l ..::.:. -0 U '- C '-
:E ~ - -2 U c ~ C1;l C > C1;l-o
C1;l 0 Q) _ a.. Q)
-0 0 ~ Q) a........ E 0.- - :.0 a.. E J:: Q) .S b.O
ro""'t-~,- C Q) ._..t: ~ c
....<I'l:Ja.. ...c .... > -0 C
:)~Q.Q)Q) C1;l U o b.O Q) "-
-b.O-O - C...o~~ .... '-
Q) C U <I'l ...; ':; E:O...o .... .... 0]
...c .- Q)- Q) C1;l Q) . c: -0 Q) b.O ""
- -0 .'!::: C1;l C a.. 0 . Vi '';;; U Q) a.. Q) "'5 .;:; ~ b.O .- ",
C ~...c Q) C1;l 0 U .;:; C1;l .... ...c 13 ~ 0 C c...c :>., '"'
Q) :J U .... - .... a.. 0 - '_ C ~ ~
Q)...o .... C1;l o &.s (5 E ...... <I'lu...cC1;la; c '-
...0 C1;l <I'l a; a; -0 <I'l <I'l .:; ...c o 0 . ...::c '-
.... = a.. C1;l'- C 0 U Cio-.......t)....... - V
- N -0 ~ :>.,~
a; C1;l - C1;l E C ~ <I'l U C1;l C ~O[a;a;
>"'5C::~ .-'- -0 .:; C1;l a;-a; ..::.t: 'E ~
<I'l a;"::':' .... a; ...c c1.i ...... -0- ...cC1;lt::
C1;lUb.O>- '- .... c C1;l...o . a.. c.'!::: C1;l<l'la;a;~ - a;.- .\:: e 0
...c C1;l Q) .... 0 c a.. E
QJ c E C vi <I'l C1;l'- >- _ a; <I'l -0 "E t:: a...,;;; ..... Q.J ~
= -....-oa; .... -0",<1)
a.. o .~ a; C1;l C1;l a;.- '- a...... 1ii'"O'"
U O:i'- ~ ~ C1;lQJCC1;l-Q) Q. -0 c.s E ...cC1;la;
~ U .- Q) :J t: a.. - .... - a.. '-c:'"O
C> C C1;l._ C C1;l .... 0 <I'l C1;l -oE .g~~EC .... <I'l 2 "" ~
2-oC1;lE32 -0 a;...c c...c a; Q) o ~ a; ~.\:: 0
Q) .~ ...... b.O...o
0:1 C ~ ~ '3 C...... U._ <I'l...c ...0 b.O ...c C1;lt;)u.J013 c '"0 !I 0..
C1;l ..::.:. -0 -0 <I'l _ V') vi J= ........- ....... f; ~ ~
..::.:. ~ Q) ::-...0 QJca;a;a;...... C c:: a; C1;l E C1;l <I'l ~ a; -0 0
UC1;l...o<l'lC U '- C <I'l U 0 C1;l :J...c ...c :J a; C1;l a; <I'l~ C '" % s
.- > C -.- :J C U U o - ...c E ~ ~::: a;:J-o
a..._ <I'l...c C1;l <I'l ~'-e;
C > >-.~ Q) Q) C C1;l Q) a; ._ a; u...... ~.c: Q) C1;l :J vi ~...o_ '';:; -.E c:
rJ) a;a;C1;lCC ...... . ~ t;)...o...... ..0 U C 0 :J
a;'- :J a;...o a; <I'l a; 0 ~s~
....J-oCl:::~C1;lc:: ~...cc>-~C1;l c a; .... E...c...c
....J o-~a...... cUQ)C1;la;...... a; <I'l ~ c:oE....:Ja;.1i a; - <I'l 0...Q -g ~
<( o.~ ~ ~ .- -0 a; E c-o ...... .- U >-<I'l~.... a.. 0 S g 0 .S
C b.OC1;l E b.O <I'l
~ C Q) - '- b.Oc.... C C1;l a; :J C1;l 13 E c <I'l .Q''::; s ~
3: o>c-o '- lJ - - 0 c .... .... ...c -
....C1;l ...c<(C1;l .... ._ C1;l Q) <I'l'~ :J <I'l 0 a;._ a; , "" Q;- '"
-o-C1;l a; a; .... >- U
~ ~o...cE~ o <I'l . b.O a;~ u...c o '-...c U -0 _ .- 0 U ~Q:j - Q.J
b.O Q) a; 'ii:i c1.i .... C1;l C U :0 a;.:2 C :J :J .... C1;l '- tlll ~ 0..
cU >-a; .S ~'S;...c a.. 2 - a;-o lJ......C1;l> a;C1;lC1;l 0" t;) c ~ ~ ~ C:l
rJ) .~ .... a; Q) ~ c ...... C ZOt;)....>-...... ~ a; C1;l '"'~o..o-o
ca; b.OC1;lX Q)
LJ..I a.. -2...c b.O ...Q .-...... U U a; ~ C1;l - >-a;a;a;oo b.O -0 . :; tlll <1) V c:
E ~ '"0<1)<(""
U a;a;~c~ .:::! '- C <I'l _ '';;; E ~.'!::: .s.... - C .... t;) 0:.:; _
C -0 .... '00 - ~ C1;l vi o:::U...co:J ~U S ~~E~
Z 1 E QJ'o.. a; '- 0 E -0 ~ ~ C a; C1;l .... U U <I'l C1;l '- a; a;
C1;lO<l'lQ)....>- ....- a; C1;l <( Q)'- -0 <I'l = a.. -t:...c-o :2 '. ~ o:~
Lf~~-g~E o~ .......c ...c...cc...oC1;lE C1;l.'!::: a;
~ ~ '- -- U u ~ o..~ge
...c...c<l'l<l'l 0.. I- ~ C1;l 0 ~ '_ 0.. u.J a..
:t ~Uco ~
~.~~~e"~QAftn~~n.A~~__._.___ .... .- .... ,.,,"'"
'.
. . JOHN R. LITTON
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
118 H.E. 16TH COURT (407)276-7575 DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA 33444
c c
:""'?H"A~I.", . '50.'1 wooD STOR,
SHeD
rNo I~. *- ~t~
r:LI>C !! +-C:/J,p
--- - -
100.00'
(M)
1.~I'o/s
~S ..
~Z !
~'" !:
. IIJ.E' a.a'
X ; I STY.
~""~- G 2: .. FRAM E"
~." ~ R ~<;;\DENCE: "
....~~ ~-L- Z'-' ... p.~ E!L,' ':1,5 2:
.;) "--.... -So- -2 ::J
-,.Q,/ ~ ~( ~ Z~ €
- -6>- I.J .' <~ (:::,p,'T
>~ o~ ...... ~ G~ '
.......~ - -...:>.>:>- . ')1.1.:0 ...J
~
D ;..& t u?
-~~\ 0 ,., I.' k:' vJ c.
~
~lij
;: i.
11.'7 .'.'1 "'0
~ N
C. e.8"l' .g't
"'/S
... o .'
1> o 0-
-... l/id:)
<? Z l"l .
, ~ -l/l
~
fmct ..., t-
....
<;;-
U Nf::B2- -:f- It~y"- .4 46~<.. 0 r",
Co\'\. ~\ 0~\l11 \.0\.\ . C"e'':1<. -r.-.if C.,........,..... ,..("-,,,,<-
tP ,7'''' Wi:J&,]>
~ >>S~
I-
I~
+~
,
ep.~.
).JAIL.. S .OO"OO'.OO"W'
I IZ7'S'(M) 5"0.00' eM). (II)
I 2'\-' A5 PH ALT f;;~
I I"IIVMT,
I Z
~\.
- - -
AVENUE"
SCALE' I '!,. eo' .,."..., SHEET c OF e SHEETS
LEGEND' BENCHMARK REFERENCE:
@ MANHOLE IM.H.) " FIRE HYDRANT IF.H,) NO-33N AN "XN CUT
a CATCH BASIN IC.B.) o WATER METER IW.M.) IN CONC.
E-ANCHOR a GUY la CABLE T.V.ICA.T.V.) S/W AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o IRON ROD a CAP !I.R.ac.) " TELEPHONE ITELE.) N.E.2NO STR. AND N. SWINTON.
<>- WOOD POWER POLE lWO. P.P.l ELEVATION = 20.77
~ CONCRETE POWER POLE "CONC. P. P)
. PERMANENT CONTROL POINTIF.:::.I';)
@ PERMANENT REFERENCE Mor4UMENTIP.R.M.) ELEVATIONS BASED,ON N.G.V.D. AND SHOWN THUS \.0
REVISIONS DATE BY CKID FLOOD ELEVATION INFORMATION
COMMUNITY No. IZS/OZ- DATE OF FIRM '/<;/8'
. BASE FLOOD ELEV. - FIRM ZONE 0)/"
LOWEST FLOOR ELEV. '21(.5 PANEL No. ('JDOZ-
. AVG. SITE GRADE - SUFFIX " 0"
JOB NO. "'1'2. o<;'''{ DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: F.B./PG/
FILE NO. n. o~, '2/2/''12 )L QL qt. lot a, ,,,
'0
.
. .
.
'~1.~ ,""'\1 P-
r:.\ 11, ~~t
'~;;; ,; 1 " '&r.1ii .
April 3, 1992
Mr. Dean A. Hoffman
310 North Swinton Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Re: Appeal of Historic Preservation Board Decision/COA 8-175;
Chain Link Fence in Front Yard at 310 North Swinton Avenue
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter of appeal with
respect to the action taken by the Historic Preservation Board on
the above referenced matter at the meeting of March 18, 1992.
Pursuant to Section 2.4.7 of the Land Development Regulations,
the appeai was received in a timely manner by the Clerk's office
on March 31, 1992.
Please be advised that the matter will be scheduled for
consideration by the City Commission at the regular meeting to be
held on Tuesday, April 14, 1992. The meeting will begin at 6:00
P.M. and will be held in the Commission Chambers at City Hall,
100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida.
You may wish to check with my office prior to the April 14th
meeting to determine the item's standing on the agenda. Should
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at
407/243-7050.
Sincerely,
Olwon ~~!/aliy
Alison MacGregor Harty
City.Clerk
AMH/m
cc: Diane Dominguez, Planner III
Cheryl Leverett, Agenda Coordinator
,.....
.
- .
TO: City of Delray Beach
FROM: Dean A, Hoffman
310 North Swinton Ave.
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
SUBJECT: Appealing the decision of the Preservation Board of the
O.S.S.H.A.D., Refusing a permit to construct a 6 FT chain
link fence.
This fence that is being appealed is attached to an existing fence, that runs
along the souths ide of my home. The fence is mainly for security
purposes, and a determent to neighborhood-crlme.
While attending the meeting, the boara wa~ agieeable to thIS untill a one
person a Cecil (Sandy) Jameson came up wi 1f! d. 6 It. 1~nc~ would set precedel!t lr
the future.
upon investigation I found that a 6 ft. fence nad been Installed at 302 N.E. 3rc
Streel', ThiS~Jt~ Place of p.ussiness that is called Ann's Grooming. 1hlS renee
. c..h.a...H ~. ~ c.., ! 6 A/ € J--g? h 6 f wooden gate HIS talled on a chair. llllk
1 S n I a t 19 g as at.
gate, with the chain linK facing the outside or N.E. 1st Ave.
All the board offered me was a 4 ft.wooden fence across the
side of my home going north to the south corner post. The board agreed that
the 6f 1. chain link fence that I installed going from that corner post gOing
west to the existing 6ft. chain link fence was approved by the board.
I have agreed to cover the front with WOOel to Keep the appearance
that the O.S.S.H.A.D. wants. The 4ft. fence that the board will approve
wotllcl not provide me the security that 1 nbed. ~ty house l1as ulOKen lr! to twice,
ancl I cannot keep nothing nice, like l.awn chell r s and uth~r valuables in my back
yarel. With this higher fence it would be a lot harder to throw things over the
fence. The surveyors plans are WIth Pat cayce at Clt)' Hall.
Sincerely
RECEIVED
3/at/9.;;l.. Dean A. Hoffman
CITY CLERK
'.'11
.
. ' . - JOHN R. LITTON
.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
118 N.E. 16TH COURT (407) 276-7575 DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA 33444
E E
:""'~I~liAcr-E I.~ . "0."3. wooO STOR,
SHED
'=NO.I.~.
..L6t.. ~ ~NO I~. ~ ~'~
t-c:.AP
--- - -
100,00'
(M)
1,'11'0/$
~S ..
"'Z ~
~III ~
~ 4.z' 0..'
z I STY
':'>~ 2 .. FRAME:
.....-!.........:.>O d...4.- ~ ~ ~ R ~'S\DENCt lc
..1 2
.) -z..... -S; ~! PF fIL," cl.,5 ~~ ~
'-~Q/ -rY' ~C .;
. ~ <~ (::,,,1'
>~<>:>- <>. ..... it G~ '
............... - .........o>~ ~ ,~I.;. [,J
:J -..,y 1- _ u 'j)
-~ ~t v f:J . i.:' vJ ~
.:: ~ ~ ~ '" 1,1
r. ".. - ~4i
'0 ;: i.
'-'0
l\l ole:' ~ N
, -- g-~
'" 'Q;' e 8"1
- v "/S
'0:. 'B o .'
o 0-
llOlri ~ <:. lricO
i<'l .
'1"1 3- -In
z- ~ "-
"" t-
~
1;'-
-:f- /I,of,&. 4 46-'l.U:. 0 r...
C"'".:K. tf-ILf Q.".-..,,,-, ~,""'~
G: ~ ,-;-,{ WD().f>
r-
I~
f
,
1ep.~,
. "'AIL.. S .00.' oo'.OO"w.
I JZ7."IS'(M) 5"0,00' (M)"'CR)
I 2'\-' A5f'HAL.T ~ f~~
, r>I'>VMT,
I ~
-<t '/,\. ;Z\:'>
- -
SW I NTON AVENUe
SCALE: ('..eo' SHEET e OF e SHEETS
LEGEND' BENCHMARK REFERENCE'
@ MANHOLE (M.H.) U FIRE HYDRANT (F. H.) "0-33" AN "X" CUT
a CATCH BASIN (C.B.) o WATER METER (W.M.) IN CONC.
f-ANCHOR a GUY iii CABLE T.V. (CA.T.V.) S/W AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o IRON ROD a CAP (I.R.llC.) . TELEPHONE (TEl-E.) N.E.2ND STR. AND N. SWINTON.
-0- WOOD POWER POLE (WO. P.P.l ELEVATION = 20.77
4 CONCRETE POWER POLE ,'CONC. P P.)
. PERMANENT CONTROL POINT (F.:.I'.)
@ PERMANENT REFERENCE MOI4UMENT(P.R.M.) ELEVATIONS BASED ON N.G.V.D. AND SHOWN THUS \.0
REVISIONS DATE BY CK'D FLOOD ELEVATION INFORMATION
COMMUNITY No. Ic.S IOZ. DATE OF FIRM 110;;/8'
BASE FLOOD ELEV. - FIRM ZONE (t X' p
LOWEST FLOOR ELEV. "21,(,5 PANEL No. (JDOZ-
. AVG. SITE GRADE - SUFFIX "0"
JOB NO. Gf-;? 0..'; DATE' DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: F.8./ PG/
FILE NO. 1Z-. 0 t;" ?oj 2/<12 )L 'DL "1('/01 a, ,'-
I',",
.
. . ~
.. JOHN R. LITTON
.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
118 N.E. 16TH COURT (407) 276-7575 DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA 33444
BOUNDARY SURVEY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE SOUTH 50.0' OF THE NORTH 250.00' OF THE EAST
135.00' OF THE SOUTH i OF BLOCK 57, AS RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK 1. PAGE 3, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY I FLORIDA
1.l.J
'7
N' I..Il.,K~ 101-\ " 1<'01\ D
t J
~
'Suf?'/E'I ~ 'Z
NT'S. LOO"IOU 3
V1
"-I W '3 RD 5TR NE 112.D snz.
z
ABBREVIATIONS
AOJ -1Il0J,It,CEHl EL .. ELEVATION PCP - peRMlIlNENT CONTROL
AlC - AIR CONDITIONER FE - FLOODPLAIN eASE'-lENT POINT
SLAB " - FINISH flOOR P. M - PERMANENT REFERENCE
BM - BENCHMARK 'NO - FOUND MONUMENT
Be. - 8ROWAAO COUNTY GA. - aA,AAGE (P) - PLAT
RECORDS INV - INVERT PB - PLAT BOOK
(e) - CALCULATED ". - IRON ROO PC - POINT OF CURVATURE
C.FT - CALCULATED FIELD Lwe - LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT P, - POINT OF INTERSECTION
TRAVERSE LAE - LIMITED ACCESS EASEMENT P.C - POINT OF REVEASE
eE - C",NAL EASEMENT Lf - loweST FLOOR CURV"'''URE
eME - CANAL MAINTENANCE MAIHT - MAINTENANCE PT - POINT OF TANGENCY
<i - CENTERLINE ME - MAINTENANCE EASEMENT t - PROPERTY UNE
CH - CHORD ,M) - MEASURED .,w - RIGHT OF WAY
CBS - CONCRETE BLOCK N'O - NAIL AND DISK REE - ROOF ENCROACHMENT EAseMENT
STRUCTURE NO.VO - NATIONAL GEODETIC (. ) - ~ECORD
COL - COLUMN VERTICAL DATUM SiW -SIDEWALK
CONe - CONCRETE N.T,S - NOT TO SCALE STY - STOR'\"
DE - DRAINAGE eASEMENT 0'" - OFF SET TO B - TOP OF 8ANK
o U &. M E - DRAINAGE... UTILITY 'l. - ON LINE UE - UTILITY EAseMENT
AND MAINTENANCE OPT - OPTIONAL UEA - U nun eA.SEMEN r AccESS
EASEI\i4ENT PG - PAGE U &. M E - UTILITY AND
Eswr - EASEMENT PBeR - PALM BEACH COUNTY MAINTENANCe EASEMENT
E'P - EDGE OF PAVEMENT RECORD
E.O.'N - EDGE OF WATER PAV.....t - "",V'EMENT
ADDRESS: 310 NORTH SWINTON AVENUE THE BEARINGS ON THIS SUR-
DELRAY BEACH, FLA 33444 VEY ARE BASED ON THE WEST
CERTIFIED TO: RIll' LI NE OF N. SWINTON
I) DEAN HOFFMAN
2)
5)
SHEET L OF 2- SHEETS
NOTES: DATE OF LAST FIELD WORK: :1./,
1) LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN
ABSTRACTED FOR EASEMENTS, OWNERSHIP
AND/OR RIGHTS' OF . WAY OF RECORD. HEREON COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM
2) NO UNDERGROUND OR INTERIOR TECHNICAL STANDAIRDS FOR SURVEYS AS
IMPROVEMENTS WERE LOCATED EXCEPT CONTAINED IN CHAPTER :/.'1HH-6, FLORIDA
AS NOTED.
3) LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SUPPLIED ADMINpTIVE ~.
BY THE CUENT.
/ / / .4~ ,,/4/Q2
~ESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR DATE
FLORIDA REGISTRATION No."'3-4-'7
. REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS SI(ETCH ARE NOT VALID UNLESS
SEALED WITH AN EMBOSSED SURVEYOR'S SEAL.
JOB NO. <1Z-0S., IDATE: Z/Z/'TZ- DRAWN BY: ICHECKED BY: IF.B./ POl
FILE NO. "fZ-OS., I JL 1:><-- "'1-101 'z ~'3
.........--
IHIt
..
. .
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER!.J,r1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM :It 9C'... - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
APPEAL OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD DECISION/THE PATIO
SHOPPES
DATE: April 10, 1992
At the March 24th regular meeting Dr. Alperin raised an appeal of the
decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with regard to the
approval of the site plan for The Patio Shoppes. This appeal was
based upon the access issue surrounding the site. We have also
received a letter of appeal from the Palm Square - Marine Way
Homeowners Association. The basis of the Association's appeal is
that the Historic Preservation Board did not fully address potential
problems with regard to parking, valet parking and size and seating
limits within the proposed restaurant.
The development proposal for this .665 acre parcel includes the
construction of two structures connected at the roo f , totalling
11,736 square feet on the site of the former Patio Delray
Restaurant. The applicant states the uses include shops and a
restaurant, with one outdoor patio seating area and offices or
studios on the second floor. The ingress/egress to the site is from
Palm Square. The parking lot accommodates 41 parking spaces. A six
foot solid masonry wall with associated landscaping will be provided
along the west and south property lines.
There appears to have been some confusion at the Historic
Preservation Board meeting with respect to how the potential for
closure of Palm Square related to the site plan consideration. The
action of the Board was without any conditions pertaining to the
closure. The Commission will need to address whether or not the
site plan approval is conditioned upon closure or partial closure of
Palm Square; whether or not Patio Shoppes will be obligated to a
future connection to 7th Avenue; and whether or not the site plan
was adequately addressed as pertains to the items brought forward by
the Palm Square - Marine Way Homeowners Association.
Additionally, the Board recommended approval of a waiver for
reduction of the perimeter landscaping buffer along the west property
line adjacent to the north parking area from five feet to four feet.
This item also needs to be addressed. A detailed staff report is
attached as backup material for this item.
..
.1
,L..,.I"--
:' /'t I
. {~1
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: DAVID T. HJ~E~' CITY MANAGER
D.JS..J '^. ~UO.t'-~
FROM: 10 J. KOVACS, DIR~R
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1992
CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
ACTION ON THE SITE PLAN FOR THE PATIO SHOPPES
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
considering an appeal of site plan approval granted by the
Historic Preservation Board.
The appeal involves "The Patio Shoppes". A proposed retail
/ office / restaurant development at the southwest corner
of Atlantic Avenue and Palm Square. The site is within the
Marina Historic District.
The appeal was formally made by Commissioner Alperin at
your meeting of March 24th. Also, a letter requesting an
appeal was filed by ~rs. ftlley (copy attached).
~ 'Pa1-~-M~W~ l-l.o.A. f1I
BACKGROUND:
Included with your packet is the staff report which was prepared
for the Historic Preservation Board (HPB). There appears to have
been some confusion with respect to how the potential for
closure of Palm Square related to the site plan consideration.
The action of the Board was l~ . without any conditions
pertaining to closure i.e. the project can proceed without any
mitigation of traffic southbound on Palm Square.
From the record, the above position may, or may not have been,
the intent of the Board. The Board did add a "caveat" to their
action noting that the site plan is subject "to any conditions
imposed by City Commission as they pertain to the closing of
Palm Square". In separate correspondence (copy attached), the
City Commission did receive from Burt Handlesman (the applicant)
a letter in which he stated II infringement of our property lines
is not something we will permit or tolerate ...". Also, as a
part of the agent's presentation, it was explained that if an
accessway were desired from Palm Square to 7th Avenue, it could
be accommodated in the design. However, there are no provisions
as to responsibility and obligations regarding dedication,
condemnation, acquisition, site plan modification, or
construction of such a connection.
.,
City Commission Documentation
Consideration of Appeal of Historic Preservation Board
Action on the Site Plan for The Patio Shoppes
Page 2
eJI.
d'k ~e.o WiIf..l.& Ikt.. ~
Attached is a letter from U__. llil_y in which she raises
concerns with the site plan and the Boardls consideration of it.
Please refer to her letter for details.
Finally, as a part of the HPB action, they recommended the
granting of a waiver for relief from landscape requirements as
they pertain to the required buffer along the west property line
adjacent to the north parking area. The provided landscape area
is four feet; whereas, the requirement is five feet.
ITEMS TO BE ADDRESSED:
1. It needs to be clear as to whether or not the site plan
approval is conditioned upon closure or partial closure of
Palm Square.
(a) If it is not, the project should be allowed to proceed
to the next stage of permitting.
(b) If it is, a condition should be imposed that
"provisions shall be made for the (complete) (partial)
closing of Palm Square concurrent with initiation of
construction, if not sooner; and that, prior to
submission for building permits, a site plan
modification shall be provided, and processed through
the HPB (P&Z) to accommodate such closure or partial
closure. Further, the Patio Shoppes development shall
be responsible for all improvements on, or adjacent,
to its boundaries which are associated with the
closure or partial closure."
2. It needs to be clear as to the obligations, if any, upon
the Patio Shoppes regarding a future connection to 7th
Avenue.
(a) If there are to be none, the record should be clear to
that effect.
(c) If there are to be obligations, the following should
be considered as additional conditions:
* that provisions be made that upon request from
the C.R.A., or the City, the right-of-way or
easement necessary to accommodate traffic
movements from Palm Square to 7th Avenue as it
traverses this property shall be dedicated
without payment.
'1
..
City Commission Documentation
Consideration of Appeal of Historic Preservation Board
Action on the Site Plan for The Patio Shoppes
Page 3
* that provisions be made that the owner of this
property shall, at his expense, make alterations to
the site plan and in the field to relocate the
dumpster area and adjust parking and landscape areas
to accommodate the travelway.
Note: It is assumed that construction of the
travelway itself will be an expense of the CRA or the
City. <1\..0.. I~()(JJW.I.J ~ ~ IL
3. Points raised by l-!r..- IUlwY -- it appears that the items
which apply to the site plan were adequately considered by
the HPB either through testimony or in the staff report.
There was no discussion of valet parking as a part of the
site plan submittal.
4. The landscape waiver needs formal action.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board has not formally reviewed this
since the site plan approval rests with the HPB. However, the
City Commission has referred the subject of possible closure, or
partial closure, to the P&Z Board for review and recommendation
prior to the commencing of a "trial closure" period. The Board
will consider this item at its May meeting.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Consider the matter of relationship of the approval to access
along Palm Square. Make a specific action.
Consider the matter of obligations in the event that a
connection to 7th Avenue is desired at a later date. Make a
specific action.
Approve the landscape waiver as recommended by the HPB.
Attachment:
* Letter of March 13, 1992, from Burton Handlesman under the
letterhead of Love Realty, White Plains, N.Y.
* Appeal letter of March 23, 1992 from the Palm Square -
Marine Way Homeowners Association (Riley/Roberts/Bowen)
* HPB Staff Report & Documentation of March 18, 1992
DJK:T:CCPATIO.DOC
.,
.,
via Fax: 407-243-3774 ~
;;'1/ u,.U,c
u.s. Mail ~~
oCove [Realty - \'a\w S,,\,...
.9 Ll. ~ew;,~'" ~~ ~ RS
~~ ~/ .A: ~ /(}~(}J A1~^ CE2IV~O
~ /9/
CITy 1,f. '992
r.4NAGER'S
March 13, 1992 OF~Cf
~ If''-:-''~
.....,.,'" t. , '.\,. ,I, '
~\.---r"',\\ .,' ,
t') .1.0 h.....;~ U ~\
City Manager\, \.)- .
Ci ty of Delray Beach ,~~ 1'0 \~~2.
100 N.W. 1st Avenue \#.~\t 14 .
Delray Beach, FL 33444 lO~\~G
. ,,~.NG &.
Re: Palm Square rL"h ' _," .-,-
-..-
Gentlemen: -.
It has come to my attention that the City intends to
barricade a portion of Palm Square thereby restricting through
traffic. If the intended barricades are placed where I have
been led to believe they will, which is at the most southern
line of properties owned by' Patio Associates on the west and
Coastal Associates on the east, then traffic entering Palm
Square from the north after the erection of the barricade will
be forced to make a U-turn to exit. The street, being only
some 20 feet wide will not accommodate a U-turn without crossing
our boundaries. Infringement of our property lines is not
something we will permit or tolerate and we ask that you notify
the police department to keep traffic from completing turns
on our properties.
We are reluctant to build our own barricades and as the
information concerning the proposed City plan has just reached
us, we have not yet had a chance to review it or react to it
in its entirety, nor have we had a chance to submit it to our
legal department for evaluation.
It seems to me that whatever the perceived problem is,
it would have made more sense to have a workshop session be-
fore taking the contemplated action. As our properties are
directly involved in the Council action, it seems reasonable
that we should have been invited to any discussions.
We ask that you protect our property rights and respectfully
suggest that you take no further action prior to hearing from
..
. . ~
City Manager
March 13, 1992
Page 2
our counselor before a meeting is held in which the workability
of the contemplated plan can be discussed.
~trU1Y yours,
_ ~~ :{,L'~ V'P c{.~~/~.~v'
. Burton Handelsman ~/
BH/ja
cc: Arthur J. Menor, Esq.
Jeffrey Kurtz, Esq.
City Attorney
Via Fax: 407-278-4755
Dick Raab
Via Fax: 407-276-5755
=
"
..
PALM SQUARE - MARINE WAY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
DELRA Y BEACH. FLORIDA
RECEIVED
-3/ JJ-f I qd- q )~1. ~5PPArW:SQUARE
CITY CLERK DELRAY BEACH. FL.
H#
JJ48J
March 23, 1992
Mrs. Allison Harty
City Clerk
City Hall
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
To the City Clerk:
We of the above named organization would like to appeal the
Historic Preservation. Board's recommendations made regarding the
Patio Shoppes on March 18, 1992.
The basis for our appeal is that the Board refused to recognize
us to give any input during the discussion of the site plan. We
feel the discussion was incomplete as the parking problem,
including the valet parking problem, was not addressed~. The
truck unloading discussion and the size of the restaurants ahd
seating were likewise not discussed.
We felt it was fair not to discuss the closing of Palm Square, as
the Commissioners had already voted to do so. However, Sandy
Simon was allowed to give his opinion.
The Planning and Zoning Board was kind enough to notify the
members of our organization of the meeting. Naturally we thought
we would be allowed to make some comments.
We ask that the City Commission hear this appeal.
7X::Lury. I
Alieda N. Ril Y. c~
~.fC
~'~L
ames L. Bowen
cc: Historic Preservation Board
Planning & Zoning
City Manager
.,
, HISTORIC PREf =RV A TION 801" RD
:CITY OF DELRAY BEACH --- STAFF REPORT ---
MEETING DATE: March 18, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: 2 & 3
ITEM: Variance No. 88-25 & COA 8-172 - Patio Shop pes
I - .
I I I J \...L-l--J I I I , r---
ATLANTIC AVENUE I I
JIl] []] I f---
....
. w
w w -J
> 0:::
'I( .... ~
V1
- (/)
~ I
- (J
-#f ~
-
~
w ~ ':l 2
+- ~I - N
- > " I
<( 0..1 I ---
- I I
GENERAL DATA:
Owner.........................Patio Associates Limited
Agent.........................Digby Bridges, Marsh & Assoc.
Location............... .......On the west side of Palm Street,
between Atlantic Avenue' and S.E.
1st Street.
Property Size.................0.665 Acres
City Land Use Plan............Commercial Core &
Medium Density 5-12 du/acre
City Zoning...................CF (Community Facilities) and
caD (Central Business District)
Adjacent Zoning.............. .North: caD
East: RM, CaD, and CF
South: RM and CBD
West: RM and CBD
Existing Land Use.............Vacant
Proposed Land Use.............Construction of a 11,736 sqft.
commercial building.
Water Service.................Existing 8" water main along the
north side of Atlantic Avenue, and
an existing 2" line along Palm
Street.
Sewer Servlce.................Exlsting 20" sanitary sewer line
along Atlantic Avenue, and an
existing 8" line along the rear of
lots 4,5,6,7 and 8.
.,
, '
-
I T E M B E FOR E THE BOA R 0:
The item before the Board is that of consideration of the
following aspects of a development proposal for the Patio
Shoppes:
* Variances (#88-25)
* Site Plan
* Landscaping
* COA 8-172
* Architectural Elevations
The subject property is located on the west side of Palm Square,
between East Atlantic Avenue and S.E. 1st Street, within the
Marina Historic District.
B A C K G R 0 UNO:
Lots 42 and 43 once contained a residential structure. In 1979,
the structure was damaged by fire and was subsequently
demolished. Since then, these two lots have remained vacant.
Lot 44 contained a portion of the parking lot associated with the
Patio Delray Restaurant, which was located along Atlantic Avenue.
In 1986, a site plan and conditional use request was submitted to
the City. The site plan proposed to renovate and convert the
existing 11,434 sq. ft. restaurant into a 12,046 sq. ft. three
story structure containing a mix of a restaurant, retail shops
and offices. The conditional use request was to allow associated
parking on lots 42 and 43, which were zoned RM-10.
At its meeting of April 14, 198-6 , the Planning and Zoning Board
recommended approval of the site plan and conditional use request
for Patio Delray subject to conditions. During the meeting there
was lengthy discussion with regard to the traffic and parking
situation.
At the City Commission level, discussions continued with respect
to alternatives to provide the required parking. The i tern was
then referred to committee and there is no record of any
disposition. In 1989, the restaurant was demolished after being
damaged by fire.
At its meeting of February 25, 1992, the City Commission approved
a conditional use request and rezoning from RM (Medium
Residential) to CF (Community Facilities) to allow a parking lot.
The parking lot is to be utilized in conjunction with the Patio
Shoppes. The attendant site plan is now before the Board for
final action. The final action involves variances and waivers
which include the following:
HPB Staff Report
Patio Shoppes
Page 2
Variance:
* Section 4.4.21(H) CF Zone District, within the front yard
setback and any street side setback area, the first 10'
abutting the right-of-way shall be a landscaped area.
The applicant is providing 5 I instead of the required
101 setback.
* Section 4.6.4(E) Where CF Zoning abuts residential zoning a
minimum of 10' landscape area shall be provided.
Along the west property line only 8' has been provided.
Along the east property line only 51 has been provided.
Waivers:
* Section 5.3.1(D}(2), 60' of right-of-way is required for a
Local Street.
Reduction in right-oi-way from 601 to 401 for Palm
Square.
. Section 6.3.1(B), Sidewalks for commercial purposes are
required to be 5' in width.
Reduction in sidewalk width from 5' to 41.
PRO J E C T DES C RIP T ION:
The development proposal is to construct two structures connected
wi th the roof, totaling 11,736 sq. ft. on the site of the former
Patio Delray Restaurant. The applicant states that uses include
shops and a restaurant on the first floor with one outdoor patio
seating area for the restaurant and on the second floor are
offices or artist studios. The ingress/egress to the site is
from Palm Square. The parking lot accommodates 41 parking
spaces .. Along the west and south property lines, a 6 ' solid
masonry wall will be provided along with associated landscaping.
SIT E P LAN A N A L Y S I S
REQUIRED FINDINGS: (Chapter 3)
Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the
approval of development applications, certain findings must
be made in a form which is part of the official record.
This may be achieved through information on the application,
the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the
body which has the authority to approve or deny the
development application. These findings relate to the
following four areas.
'1
HPB Staff Report
Patio Shoppes
Page 3
Future Land Use Map: The use or structures must be allowed in
the zoning district and the zoning district must be consistent
with the land use designation.
A portion of the property (Lots 42,43 & 44) has a CF zone
designation. CF (Community Facilities) is deemed compatible
with all land use designations shown on the Future Land Use
Map.
The balance of the property is zoned CBD (Central Business
District) . CBn is deemed compatible with the Commercial
Core designation on the Future Land Use Map.
Concurrency: Facilities which are provided by, or through, the
City shall be provided to new development concurrent with
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. These facilities shall
be provided pursuant to levels of service established within the
Comprehensive Plan.
Water:
Water service to the site exists via a 2" main located along the
east side of Palm Square and an 8" main located along Atlantic
Avenue. The 2" main extends from S.E. 1st Street and terminates
1001 south of Atlantic Avenue. The 2" main is not sufficient to
provide adequate fire suppression to the site. The upgrading of
the 2" main to an 8" main will be required.
There was a proposal to extent the main with the Brandy's site
and development plan. However, that was deferred until there was
a need to provide fire suppression. The proposed main extension
and fire hydrant associated with Brandy's will be installed as a
part of this site plan action. The 8" main will run along the
east side of Palm Square terminating north of the Brandyls
entrance at a fire hydrant. A 2" domestic line will be extended
west from the fire hydrant to service the proposed Patio Shoppes
building.
Sewer:
An existing 8" sanitary sewer main is located along Palm Square
and along the rear of lots 4,5,6,7,& 8 . No sewer main upgrading
or extensions will be required with the overall development
proposal. The survey provided does not indicate that there is a
utility easement which covers the existing main.
Drainage:
Drainage will be accommodated on-site through the provision of an
exfiltration system and swales.
HPB Staff Report
Patio Shoppes
Page 4
Streets and Traffic:
The preliminary traffic study indicates that the development
meets concurrency. However, final approval will be required by
Palm Beach County since the projected traffic volumes exceed
1,000 ADTs.
The traffic study as submitted, indicates that there will be 188
trips utilizing the driveway during the peak hours. There
appears to be a disparity between the number of provided parking
spaces and what will actually be needed to handle the amount of
traffic for the intended uses. It should be noted that parking
requirements in the caD are generally less stringent than
elsewhere in the City. This reduction is predicated upon the
following: a) the availability of nearby public parking, b) the
tendency of people who work downtown to walk to shopping located
within a few blocks, c) a substantial amount of pedestrian
traffic coming from business where the customer leaves their
vehicle in one lot.
There are several deficiencies in the traffic report and it will
need to be corrected. The Director has allowed processing to
continue even though the report has those deficiencies.
Parks, Open Space Solid Waste:
Commercial developments are not required to provide park
dedication fees.
A double wide dumpster has been provided to accommodate solid
waste. A development of this size will have a minimal impact
upon the land fills.
Consistency: Compliance with the performance standards set forth
in Section 3.3.3 along with the required findings in Sections
2.4.S(F)(S) (General Compatibility and Harmony with Adjacent
Properties) shall be the basis upon which a finding of overall
consistency is to be made. Other objectives and policies found
in the adopted Comprehensive Plan may be used in making of a
finding of overall consistency.
Section 3.3.3 (Standards for Site Plan Actions): The applicable
performance standards of Section 3.3.3 and other policies which
apply are as follows:
A) Building design, landscaping, and lighting (Glare) shall be
such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or
blockage of visibility as it pertains to Traffic Circulation.
The parking lot is designed in such a way that two dead-end
parking bays are created. The parking area to the north has a
potential for blockage of visibility. If the parking lot is full,
a vehicle must back out in order to turn around. It may be
"
HPB Staff Report
Patio Shoppes
Page 5
appropriate to provide the handicap spaces at the west end of the
parking lot for the purpose of a turn around, as these spaces
would not be utilized as frequently. The parking area to the
south is fairly short and does not appear to have the same
visibility problems.
B) Appropriate separation of travelways is made for vehicles,
bicycles, and pedestrians in a manner consistent with
objective 0-1 of the Traffic Element.
The development proposal meets the above standard by providing a
very pedestrian oriented development as it relates to Atlantic
Avenue. An extensive sidewalk system is provided adjacent to
Atlantic Avenue which traverses through the building to the rear
parking lot. Also, the sidewalk is extended along the length of
the east property line. There is a clear separation for
pedestrians and travelways for vehicles. No provision has been
made for bicycle racks. However, they would be appropriate being
that it is in an urbanized area with a minimal amount of parking
spaces. Accommodating such alternative means of transportation is
encouraged.
C) Open space enhancements described in Open Space and
Recreation Objective B-1, are appropriately addressed.
Objective B-1 states that "Part of the imagery of open space is
that of vistas and streetscapes". The policies which accomplish
this objective appear to apply to larger developments which can
provide large open spaces and includes City street beautification
programs. However, the Patio Shoppes development proposal meets
this objective as well.
Even though the City street beautification program is intended
for "scenic drives" and pertains to the beautification of the
medians, the proposal to extend the Atlantic Avenue streetscape
interior to the site and along Palm Square which keeps within the
theme of the street beautification program.
Another policy which is "part of the imagery" states that new
developments shall provide central focal points at entries and
landscape buffers along the external streets which service them.
The development proposal meets this criteria by providing an
opening in the middle of the building where there is a view/vista
to a fountain. In this case heavy landscaping is not prov ided,
however, it is replaced with hardscape materials which is
probably more appropriate given its location in an urbanized
area.
D) That any street widening associated with the development
shall not be detrimental upon desired character and
cohesiveness of affected residential area.
'.
HPB Staff Report
Patio Shoppes
Page 6
It was determined with the Brandyls site plan, that the widening
of Palm Square to the standard 60' right-of-way section, would be
detrimental upon the character of the residential area to the
south. This would also hold true for this development proposal.
Therefore, a waiver is being requested for the reduction of
right-of-way to 40'.
E) [Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential]
This standard does not apply.
F) Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the
future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil,
topographic, and other applicable physical considerations
complementary to adjacent land uses.
See discussion on page 5 of this report under Comprehensive Plan
Policies which apply.
G) [Demographic mix]
This standard does not apply.
Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings):
Pursuant to Section 2.4.5 (F) (5) (Findings), in addition to
provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a
finding that development of the property pursuant to the site
plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and
nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause
substantial depreciation of property values.
The subject property is located in the central business district.
To the north, east and west are commercial developments. To the
south and west of the south parking lot are residential uses. At
the time of the conditional use request and rezoning for the
parking lot, a determination was made that the CF zone district
was a good buffer between the commercial uses and the residential
uses. A parking lot is less intense than a commercial use
abutting residential uses. The development should help as a
catalyst for redevelopment in the CBD. The proposed development
should attribute to an appreciation in property values in the
surrounding area.
Another aspect of compatibility involves congestion and traffic
flows as it relates to this project. These items discussed in
the following paragraphs:
..
Conqestion:
The traffic study as submitted, indicates that during the morning
peak hours there will be a total of 115 trips per hour and the
evening peak hours there will be a total of 188 trips per hour.
.,
HPB Staff Report
Patio Shoppes
Page 7
<<
Per the report, it can could concluded that the parking lot will
be highly congested. However, staff feels there will be fewer
vehicle trips than the report states, due to the availability of
parking in downtown.
Traffic Flows:
Traffic through the residential area to the south has been an
issue in the past. However, with this proposal, the restriction
to make left turn movements on Atlantic Avenue has been removed.
The removal of the sign is on a trial basis for one
year.
Also, at its meeting of March 11, the City Commission agreed to
the closure of Palm Square with a turn-around on the Patio
Shoppes property. See attached excerpt from the City Commission
Documentation labled "Exhibit A". A positive finding can be made
regarding compatiblity with adjacnet neighborhoods as long as the
closure of Palm Square exists.
Compliance with the Land Development Regulations:
Item identified in the Land Development Regulations shall
specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on
a land development application/request.
Parking:
Parking required in the CBD is 1 space per 300 sq. ft. [REF.
4.4.13 (G)(l)]. There is a total of 11,736 sq.ft of gross floor
area which would require 40 parking spaces. However, 41 parking
spaces have been provided.
In the Site Data there is 1,332 sq.ft called out for the sidewalk
area, which is located adjacent to the patio shops under the
. overhang of the second story. Since there is one additional
parking space, 300 sq. ft. of outdoor dining area may be
utilized. If the applicant wishes to increase the outdoor
dining, it would require one of the options identified in the
attached memo from Diane Dominquez.
Pursuant to Section 5.3.1(D)(2), 601 of right-of-way is required
for a local collector street. Palm Square has an existing
right-of-way of 40' . With the Brandy's proposal, this item was
addressed and was determined to create a more non-conforming
situation with Brandy's. Therefore, the City Engineer was in
support of the reduction in right-of-way. The applicant is
requesting the same reduction for the Patio Shoppes. The HPB has
the authority to waive this requirement.
Along with the reduction in right-of-way width, the applicant is
requesting a reduction in the required sidewalk width from 5' to
41 [REF. 6.3.1(B)]. It is appropriate to provide the 4' width in
that it provides additional sodded area between the edge of
pavement for Palm Square and the sidewalk. This area can be
utilized for drainage purposes.
HPB Staff Report
Patio Shoppes
Page 8
It may even be appropriate to eliminate the sidewalk from the
edge of the parking area south. With the Brandy's proposal the
sidewalk requirement was waived. The Board may wish to discuss
this at further length at the meeting when the applicant is
present.
Setbacks:
Within the area encompassed by the boundaries of the DDA
(Downtown Development Agency) , there is no required front,
interior, side or street side setback. If there is no dedicated
access to the rear of the building, a 10' setback is required
[REF. 4.4.13(G) (2)].
The building setback provides a zero setback to the front, side
interior and side street with access to the rear of the building.
Therefore, the development proposal meets this requirement.
Pursuant to Section 4.6.4(E), where a CF zone district is
adjacent to a residential district, whether separated by a street
or alley, a special district boundary treatment is required. A
landscaped setback of 15' ; or a landscaped setback of 10' and
either a six foot solid masonry wall or continuous hedge at least
4 1/2' in height is required. The site plan indicates:
* a 101 landscape setback with a 6 · solid masonry wall
will be provided along the south property line;
* an 81 landscape setback with a 6 · solid masonry wall
will be provided along the west property line adjacent
to the residential property, and;
* a 51 landscape strip will be provided along the east
property line (frontage along Palm Square).
With respect to the west property line, the reduction of the
landscape area by 2 ' will not be a concern as a wall will be
provided on the property line. Along the east property line
there is approximately 501 which is affected by this code
requirement, of that 50', only 20' does not meet the 10' setback.
Due to the tightness of the site, and the small area which is
affected, it would be appropriate to grant a variance for the
above requirement.
Along with the above requirement, pursuant to Section 4.4.21(H)
CF Zone District, within the front yard setback and any street
side setback area, the first 10' abutting the right-of-way shall
be a landscaped area. This would apply to the CF zone district
which abuts Palm Square along the south parking lot. Again, it
would be appropriate to grant a variance as it effects only a
portion of the property along the east side.
*NOTE: Attached are the applicant IS justification statements
and criteria for basis of granting a variance
REF:2.4.7(A), 4.5.1(J)].
.,
HPB Staff Report.
Patio Shoppes
Page 9
Buildinq Height:
Buildings within the CBD may be up to 48' in height. The
proposed building height is 291. Therefore, this requirement has
been met.
Open Space:
Pursuant to Section 4.3.4(K), 25% of non-vehicular open space is
required. The development provides for 32.5% of open space.
o THE R:
Plat:
Through the review process, it was discovered that the Palm
Square Plat was never recorded. Also, it has been identified
that no utility easements have been provided to cover the FPL
lines and sewer main which runs east/west behind lots 4-8. Along
the east property line, a portion of the public sidewalk is
located on private property. In light of the above, it would be
appropriate to plat the property in order to provide the
necessary easements. The appl icant has verbally agreed to plat
the property.
Overhead Power Lines:
Pursuant to Section 6.1.8 all new development is to provide
utility structures such as electric power underground. There is
overhead power lines which traverse the site. These lines are
esthetically unpleasing and should be located underground. The
applicant may request a waiver from this requirement from the
City Commission.
LAN D SeA P E A N A L Y S I S
Pursuant to Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) a 5' landscape strip is
required between vehicular use areas and adjacent properties.
Only 4 · has been provided at the west end of the north parking
lot. The applicant has provided a justification statement which
indicates that on an average this requirement has been met. The
Board should make a recommendation to the City Commission
regarding this waiver request.
In general, the proposal meets the intent of Section 4.6.16. The
parking lots are the only areas being landscaped as the building
has a zero setback long the east, west and north sides therefore,
no landscaping can be accommodated. It is noted that palm trees
exist along Atlantic Avenue, within the street right-of-way, as
part of the streetscape beautification program.
HPB Staff Report
Patio Shoppes
Page 10
There are proposed trees located on top of the existing sanitary
sewer line. These trees will need to shifted in order to not be
in conflict with the utility lines.
E LEV A T ION A N A L Y S I S
The elevations appear to have a "Mizner" design character. The
roof material is to be a terricotta barrel tile. The base of the
building is to be painted a light pink with light yellow columns
and white accent bands. The color combination keeps within the
"Caribbean flavor" which seems to be the theme developing along
Atlantic Avenue.
REV I E W B Y o THE R S:
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY:
At its meeting of March 5, 1992, the Community Redevelopment
Agency reviewed and recommended approval of the site and
development plan requests. With the recommendation that outside
dining should be maximized in the project and that parking
requirements for this additional seating be waived.
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY:
This item will be presented to the DDA at its March 16 meeting.
The DDAls recommendation will be presented to the Board at its
meeting.
ASS E SSM E N T AND CON C L U S ION:
The development proposal appears to meet most of the LOR
requirements and required findings. The variances and waivers
are being requested in order to maximize the parking. A plat
will be required to accommodate all the necessary easements. A
water main extension will be required in order to provide the
necessary fire suppression for the building.
There is some concern over the parking and congestion, even
though, the parking provided meets code requirements for the CBD.
The traffic study, as submitted, indicates that there will not be
enough parking to accommodate traffic at peak hours. The study
does not take into account any outdoor seating which may be
provided in the future. However, there is alternative parking
available along Atlantic Avenue and public parking lots in the
vicinity of the site.
Overall, the proposed development will encourage redevelopment
and revitalization to Atlantic Avenue and downtown City of Oelray
Beach.
.,
HPB Staff Repor~
Patio Shoppes
Page 11
A L T ERN A T I V E ACT ION S:
A. Continue with direction.
B. Deny the site and development request with basis stated.
C. Approve the site plan, variances, landscape plan, COA 8-172
and elevations for the Patio Shoppes.
S T A F F R E COM MEN D A T ION:
By separate motions:
1- Approve of the site and development plan request for the
Patio Shoppes based upon positive findings with respect to
Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development
Regulations, policies of the Comprehensive plan and Section
2.4.5(F)(5) with the following waivers, variances and
conditions:
Variances:
Approve the following variance request based upon pos i t.i ve
findings pursuant to Section 2.4.7(A)(S) and 4.S.1(J):
a. Approve the variance request from Section 4.4.21(H) to
reduce the setback from 10' to 51 along the east
property line.
b. Approve the variance request from Section 4.6.4(E), to
reduce the setback from 101 to 8 ' along the west
property line and 10' to 51 along the east property.
Waiver:
a. Approve the request to reduce the right-of-way width
from 60' to 40 I . ----~ .-.
-----~ - - -'~ --.--" .
b----Approve die' request to reduce the sidewalk width from
, ....~ . 5' t:~~---aPPSop~i~te, approve the elimination of
lb the sidewalk from the edge of the parking lot to the
south property line with a treatment similar to
Brandy's.
c. Recommend approval to the City Commission regarding the
waiver request from Section 4.6.16(H) (3) (d) to reduce
the required 5' landscape strip along the west property
line adjacent to the north parking lot to 41.
HPB Staff Report
Patio Shoppes
Page 12
Conditions:
a. That a plat be recorded for the subject property to
include the necessary easements as outlined in this
staff report.
b. As appropriate, depending upon disposition of variance
and waiver items.
c. Provide the overhead power lines underground pursuant to
Section 6.3.8.
2. Approve the landscape plans based upon positive findings
pursuant to Section 4.6.16.
3. Approve the Elevations based upon positive findings pursuant
to Section 4.6.18.
Attachments:
* Section 2.4.7(A)(S) and Section 4.S.1(j)
* Site Plan
* Justification Statements
"
EXCERPT FROM CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION
(Exhibit A)
TRIAL CLOSURE OF PALM SQUARE:
During the Commission's consideration of the rezoning ordinance
on first reading, there were comments made about traffic flow.
In response to that concern (and to petitions received from Palm
Square property owners), your staff is proposing the following
on a trial basis:
* The closure of palm Square to through traffic by placing a
barrier (as used in Delray Estates) across Palm Square at
the scuth end of the "Brandy's" parking lot. A hammer turn
around would be provided on the proposed (OF) parking lot
site until construction of the Patio Shoppes commences.
* When construction commences, the turnaround and barrier
would be relocated to the southwest corner of Lot 42 (this
will necessitate the resident next to Brandy's parking lot
to take access from the north.
If during the above period we witness greater congestion and
accident history at Palm Square and Atlantic, the trial period
would be terminated. If after the above periods, it is desired
to make the barrier and turn-around permanent, appropriate
actions to do so will occur.
Rationale: It is thought that by using the above "trial"
approach, we can assess traffic flow and congestion impacts
before we nave the influence of 100% operation of the Patio
Shoppes and of Brandy's Restaurant. If problems occur at this
lesser level of intensity, the prohibition should be removed.
If no problem arise and the increased intensity does not create
problems, then the prohibition should become permanent.
Arrangements to accommodate the above closings will be handled
through staff contact with the property owners and through
accommodations on th~ site plan.
"
~ c
- ~ -lnN3^V 811NVl.lV ! j- -
C' _
- 0
~ ~
- '""
j
j
I
N ,: O'.:.~. , ,;'",. '0" \.; I
- .i flf',p it'l' '~H~Hjr.p :j,. -
LLI ' 't~' " ~ ,',' I'~'" 0 LLI
_~_ JtIM,~!rlh:c.::...~~!!LD;;; _~
_ 'P'" a:l OJ. lL:l'ttl~lti[I1.0~'.."""I'II"'..... m
..., ,4( . ~ H",t i".lIt"""I,:'i:i"'II"pr ,. ~
li (J)' I hr, ':'''Il:i!il .",d! [::11. I
9,... ....., - (J)~
n. ' c H'ih n. ... ,
- 0 en . .l,fl:ll 0 en
::) 0 ' r. . . .
III J:LL1 .. , I','{: ? ::c: LLI
CJ (J)g : I! I! :: (/)g
z . u. . It:;., u.
~ -- ~~i I
sa 0 ",i,n 0
r&1 - 'l:U1r - I
.1.tS .11 -:if .I.U
'I"'{;' I
, :. ~i; ,. . '---
'~:>:-:' -':,':.";; ;')>- :"i ','. I
,.." .~~.~
I
Ol .za ~l
, ~
I :!
'S... 1-.~ ~ I
i J~ :
~ i c i~ ~
N U als:.. N
C U
m
o - - i -
J _ - W I
~ ,It CJ .IS. f . .!E a: I
! ~ '. <
I OO.Sl'." ::>
-- ~ 0
3..: . - (1)1
a ~
I J /~, J _ ~
~ I- I ..~ <
= d I Q. (/).
J ~ I I ) ~
~ i c i~1 ' ~ ~
d 1 i I ~~
1'1 i . ~ t~CJ
1i~ . N IW?:
11 E c' o~
.. . lU I za:
~~
D..
__ 1=-
...:.-.
,
o!II
, I
.
I
g u. I 1
~ ~ u
a: 9"" ~
,
I
.1 ,I ,~I J
-~nl I .
.,
,jB~8b: . I I
N.E. 1 ST ST.
~ VETERANS I
>-
~ "-
1,~ Q:
u..i ~ -.)- ~
z ~'v PARK ~ I
~~
[[] ~ I ~
ATLANTIC AVENUE I
~~ I I
')j~
~ ~
<
I-
~ ~ -J I
~ en ~
w ~ ~.
~ r::. I I !:l
_ : 0
~ U
~ ~ j
.:f .., 1
. \.oJ ~ c..
~ ~ -
I ~ ~
.
en
.
:J
......, S.E. 1ST ST. I
I I-
I-
to
I
~ PATIO DELRAY N
- SITE PLAN - ~
I I ,I I
., ' ,
_.
,. ,.-
- -
Section 4.5.1 (J)
(J) Historic Preservation Board to act on Variance
Requests: Pursuant to the powers granted in Section 2.2.6(0),
the Historic Preservation Board shall act on all variance
requests, within a Historic District or on a Historic site, which
otherwise would be acted upon by the Board of. Adjustments. In
acting on such variance requests the Board shall be guided by the
following in addition to the criteria normally used by the Board
of Adjustments.
( 1 ) That a variance is necessary to maintain the
historic character of property through demonstrating that:
(a) A variance would not be contrary to the
public interest, safety, or welfare.
(b) Special conditions and circumstances exist,
because of the historic setting, location,
nature, or character of the land, structure,
appurtenance, sign, or building involved,
which are not applicable to other lands,
structures, appurtenances, signs, or
buildings in the same zoning district, which
have not been designated as historic sites or
a historic district nor listed on the Loca 1
Register of Historic Places.
(c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of
existing ordinances would alter the historic
character of the historic district, or
historic site to such an extent that it would
not be feasible to preserve the historic
character, of the historic district or
historic site.
(d) The variance requested Is the minimum
necessary to maintain the preservation of the
historic character of a historic site or of a
historic district.
( 2) The Board shall otherwise follow all procedures,
impose conditions, and make findings as required of the Board of
Adjustments.
1
-,
BASIS FOR VARIANCES
Pu.rsuan t to Section 2.4.7(A)(5), the Historic Preservation B04rd
must make the following findings prior t~ granting a variance:
(A) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are
peculiar to the land, structure, or buildLlg involved and which
are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or
buildings subject to the same zonintJ (The matter of economic
hardship shall not constitute a basis for the granting of a
var iance) ;
(B) That literal interpretation of the regulations would deprive
the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties
subject to the same zoning;
(C) That the special conditions and circumstances have not resulted
from actions of the applicant;
(0 ) That granting the variance will not confer into the applicant
any special privilege that is denied to other lands,
structures, and buildings under the same zoning. Neither the
permitted, nor nonconforming use, of neighborhood lands,
structures, or buildings under the same zoning shall be
considered grounds for the issuance of a variance;
( E) That the reasons set forth in the variance petition justify the
granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum
variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the
land, building, or structure; and,
.
(F) That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with
general purpose and intent of existing regulations, will not be
injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detriment41 to the
public welfare.
Pursuant to Section 4.5.l(J), In addition to the above criteria, in
acting on varianc requests the Board shall also be guided by the
following:
( 1 ) That a. variance is necessary to maintain the historic
character of prvperty through demonstrating that:
(a) A variance would not be contrary to the publ ic
interest, safety, or welfare.
'.
."" ra':l~ LV - -
(b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because
of the historic setting, location, nature, or
character of the land, structure, appurtenance, sign,
or building involved, which are not applicable to
other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or
buildings in the same zoning district, which have not
been designated as historic sites or a historic
district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic
Places.
(c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing
ordinances would alter the historic site to such an
extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the
historic character, of the historic district or
historic site.
(d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to
maintain the preservation of the historic character
of a historic site or a historic district.
TiSUNLOT3.DOC
'. ...
. . ~ ,.- ..c, --_... .,-,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMBERS
FROM: DIANE DOMINGUEZ, PLANNER III
DATE: MARCH 10, 1992
RE: ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO PARKING FOR OUTDOOR SEATING
AREA - PATIO SHOPPES
The purpose of this memo is to clarify the options which are
available for addressing a potential parking shortage at the
Patio Shoppes development.
Plans which were initially submitted for review indicated that
outdoor seating would be available in the courtyard adjacent to
the ground floor restaurants. Staff noted at the time that the
parking shown on the plan was not sufficient to accommodate both
the areas under roof and the outside seating area.
Subsequently, we have had additional discussion with the project
architect regarding this issue. The architect has indicated
that the outdoor area which might be used for seating is
approximately 600 square feet in size. Under the CBD parking
requirements, one parking space must be provided for each 300
square feet of floor area. Therefore, two parking spaces would
have to be provided for this use in addition to those required
for the uses inside of the building.
The existing site plan provides 41 parking spaces for the
building itself, where 40 spaces are required. This leaves a
shortage of 1 space if the outdoor seating area where included
in the plan. According to the project architect, it is not
possible to redesign the parking lot to include the additional
space.
The options for addressing the parking shortage are as follows:
1. Provide parking off-site.
Required parking can be provided off-site on other property
located within 300 feet, as long as both properties are of
the same general type of zone designation. Such an
arrangement would be subject to an agreement between the
property owners stating that the parking shall not be
transferred or sold separately from the use which it is
intended to serve. Through this mechanism, the additional
parking space could come from the Brandyls lot, located
across Palm Square from the subject property.
.,
To: HPB
Re: Alternative Approaches to Parking for
Outdoor Seating Area - Patio Shoppes
Page 2
2. Provide a sidewalk cafe in conjunction with the
outside seating.
If tables were placed in the right-of-way as well as on the
property, and if the proper permits were obtained, the
outside dining area could qualify as a sidewalk cafe. The
parking requirement for the entire outside area would then
be waived. It should be noted, however, that this section
of the sidewalk (east of 5th Avenue) is within the Florida
Department of Transportation right-of-way, and would
require that agency's approval as well as the City's.
3. Payment in-lieu of parking.
In the CBD zoning district, payment can be made for parking
which is required but cannot be provided on site. The
payment rate is $2,500 per space. The fee must be paid
prior to the issuance of a building permit. Fees paid
in-lieu of parking must be approved by the City Commission.
4. Accommodation as a non-impacting amendment.
A special CBD parking task team may recommend that when a
small scale addition is made to existing uses, a waiver be
automatically granted for one to three parking spaces. If
such a waiver option existed, the outdoor dining are could
be added post construction of the new building and, thus,
not be subject to providing additional parking or payment
of an in-lieu fee. It is not known when this
recommendation will be processed through the Planning and
Zoning Board and on to the City Commission.
s. Apply to the Historic Preservation Board for a
variance to the parking requirement.
The applicant could seek a variance from the code to
provide 41 parking spaces where 42 are required. Since the
property is in an historic district, this variance would be
heard by the Historic Preservation Board. The applicant
would be required to demonstrate why a variance is
necessary for this property. The Historic Preservation
Board would have to make findings relative to special
conditions which exist on the land which create a hardship
with respect to meeting this particular code provision.
Any of these options could be acted upon at a future date, after
a decision has been made as to the use of outdoor seating.
Staff felt, however, that it is appropriate at this time to
inform the Board and the applicant of the various alternatives,
in order to allow adequate time to decide on a course of action.
Digby .dridges, Marsh & Assoc.. ~es, P.A.
124 N.E. STHAVEr\UE. DELR<\YBEACH, FL33483
407-278-1388
',~ J~'/ --~_. ---+---~- .- -- -.'- ------~-- -- ----------- --- --- -_.-. .---
----- - - +----- ---+---- -- -- - --- ---~-- ----------- -- ---- --. - ---.'-
"'i::..:.~ -- -- - ------_.- ------ - --.---. ---.--. ----.- -.- - --+-.- -- ..------
-------..-.- ~---- ------.--.--- -_._-------------~--- --- +-+---- . --
~, ._.....~._4...;::.. ~ - ~---- -.- ----. - - ---- - -- --- ----. .-- -- ---_.+----_. ------------ ---- --
- ---~...... -~-~---_._--_._-------_.~ --------------.------- --- _._- - -- - -
/'rj-r --~------------------ -----. -~------------------- --
--- --- --------------- ----------- ----~ . ----
---------~ --.--- -
4 March 1992
Ms. Janet Meeks
City of Delray Beach
100 NW 1st street
Delray Beach, FL 33444
RE: Patio Shoppes
Dear Janet:
In regards to Item #6 - Width of Right-of-Way, we are requesting
that this remain at the existing 40' width. This is in an
historical district and to increase the right-of-way width by
taking a further 10' either side of the existing right-of-way would
be very detrimental to the area, and in particular, to the
residences to the south of the Patio Shoppes development. To leave
the right-of-way at its present width is not detrimental to the
area, and is more in keeping.
In regards to Item #7 sidewalk of 4' width. Here, once again,
there are no sidewalks in the area, with the exception of the
recently installed sidewalk from Atlantic Avenue onto the renovated
parking lot of Brandy's Waterfront Cafe. This is a very limited
sidewalk, but it does service the area it is intended to service.
Bearing in mind these aspects of the area, it is felt that a 4'
sidewalk is quite adequate for the western side of Palm Square. As
it is now shown on the drawing, this 4' wide sidewalk extends to
the south of the Patio Shoppes site. We would be grateful if the
Board would consider this sidewalk only extending from Atlantic
Avenue to the northern side of the entrance way to the parking lot.
This, along with the 4' width, we feel would be more appropriate
for the area, and that the 4' width is quite adequate to service
the said development. k';J
~<'". '. ......
~<""\,. 1......\..
-. ............-
r.'" . ; ~
~'';/ .'
~\.!) \'~.
';'. ~ Ci) . ',,-
~~~ '~\~\'
~ ' ,. ~~v
~. r;,.
\~v
.~\\
~~\
~ .'
--
/
C}{4RTERED ARCHITECTS - PLASSERS - ISTERiOR DESIGSENS
.,
.
One further point we wish to clarify is that of uses. our client
is requesting all uses allowed under the ceo zoning. The traffic
study has been prepared presuming that both areas on the 1st floor
could be small restaurantS.
Kind regards,
Yours sincerelY,
DIGBY BRIDGES, MARSH & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
ll)~)
Di'~~Y C. Bridges, A.LA., R.LB.A.
DCB/sl
Di~ . dridges, Marsh & Ass. l~(,es? P,A.
124 ~ .E. 5TH A VE~UE, D ELRA Y BEACH. I- L 33483
407-278-1388
.) j~'/ .__:..-=--~---.-.- --. ------:--
~...:~ii~.""" - --- - - ----.
::';;T~'~Z: ~-=-=':'~~~'_- -:~--____~ .:~~.-.='-=- ~ .----..:::.. .~_~:---- ---- ---. - .:"=:"'~~_-__-_- -=-=--.-=- ~..::-=:_
-------------- ..--- ---- ---_.-._~---------_._- -- ------- -----------. - ---- -
2 March 1992
Ms. Janet Meeks
Planning & zon~g Dept.
city of Delray Beach
100 NW 1st Street
Delray Beach, FL 33444
RE: Patio Shoppes
Dear Janet:
In regards to item 4 of your February 25th transmittal, we wish to
request for a waiver on this particular aspect of the site design.
It is felt that the charter of this historical district and other
historic districts is brought about by a great variety of building
set backs, landscape strips of various widths, parking directly off
the street, etc. It is also felt that this is a minor request
bearing in mind that this 5 ft. variance to the codes requirements
only exists for 10 ft. of the 50 ft. of CF zoned area that is
directly opposite the RM zoned area on the other side of Palm
Square. One other point is taken into account regarding this
request, and that is the average depth of landscaping along this 50
ft. is +14 ft. There is also a hedge along the complete length of
this boundary. Bearing all these facts in mind, it is requested
that the Board grant a waiver from section 4.4.21 (H) CF Zone
District.
Item 5 of your February 25th transmittal, we are also requestip~ ~
waiver from the Board. The same argument exi3ts in regards tot he
charter of this area as other historic areas. This is also a minor
request of omitting only 2 ft. more of landscaping for a distance
of 24 ft. along a boundary of 75 ft. length, where the average
landscape strip is greater than 11'0". Bearing all these facts in
mind, it is requested that the Board grant a waiver from Section
4.6.5(E) where CF zoning abuts residential zoning.
We feel that both these variances are the absolute minimum
necessary to maintain the preservation of the historic character of
the area.
-=- ~~ ~ '.,' . '. . - =::
W\~t... .\
t"'" . . ". ~
I ~ ,~ -~,_.... '- ~0..J' .
. \'I'~ \
!.\ V
"
n ~-."",
tJV~ t) h,'
_ .nl, "
r: - -, U' \\,; 11'~'
:0. r, i r,~ : N....] ~ _ J J "
CH4RTERED ARcIllTECTS - PLiSSERS -/:fHffJoi? DESIGSERS
.w;a. _:--
.,
We would also like to point out that to meet those required
landscape strips, that at least four parking spaces would be
omitted which, in our opinion, wold be more detrimental to the
area.
We thank you for the help given to us on this project.
Kind regards;
Yours sincerely,
DIGBY BRIDGES, MARSH & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
.
~
\)t) \\;~ A.I.A.,
Digby"" C. Br/. dges, R.LB.A.
DCB/sl
U15 . Bridges, Marsh & ...~.J( Oates, P.A.
124 ~.E. 5TH AVEr\CE, DELRAY BEACH. FL33483
407-278-1388
~~:/:~'<~ ---.----~ ~~~=~~ ~;-~~.:. --<:~',--~-~.:_-_.- -~.. =. _.-
-:";;i{s:..i: .~~-- '-~.~~-~-'~j:_----~~ _~-:.~.~ -:.- -~.:.~'-~=~_-~-_____-~~..---=- -~~::--:==-~--=~:.-=- :'-._~-_
--------------------- ----~. --- -_._~-_.--- ------~---- - --- -- --- -.
2 March 1992
Ms. Janet Meeks
Planning & Zoning Dept.
city of Delray Beach
100 NW 1st street
Delray Beach, FL 33444
RE: Patio Shoppes
Dear Janet:
In regards to Item 2 in your transmittal of February 25, 1992, the
4' strip of landscaping at the northwest end of the northern
parking area. As this strip of landscaping is only l' shy of the
required 5' landscape strip, and it occurs only for a distance of
24'0" in relation to the overall 70' length of the boundary, and
that the average depths of landscaping is over 8' in depth, it is
felt that this adequately meets the intent of the code, and we
cordially request a waiver for this l' strip of landscaping.
Items 1 and 3 have been addressed on the site plan. See
adjustments to the plans.
Kindest regards,
Yours sincerely,
DIGBY BRIDGES, MARSH & ASSOCIATES, P.A. '
Ujuv~
Digby C. Bridges, A.I.A., R.I.B.A.
DCB/sl ' ~(':;:<,~
~~, . . ~- :'\\)
R '.' '0. \~~.:...
ce\" .;.
~,. ~ -.::J'~ '.
~,.,:~ ~. '"
'" .~v.
V.~.... . to\~\\ ./
.()~
.~\~
~-.J'-~
-'-
CHARTERED ARCHITECTS - PLJ.SSERS -ISTERlOR DESIGSERS
".
'.
'. K t=..c.<ci oeD A-n 0 t,. IceD 8t..~repr
HPB frCXlon on PA-no SHoPPtFs
I1EMPBAIIDT,/M ~ ~
SfJ . JfIIL/ /9,;}-
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS bd
'/
FROM: CITY MANAGER ./
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM ~ ~J1 - MEETING OF MARCH 24. 1992
REPORT OF APPEALABLE LAND USE ITEMS
DATE: March 20, 1992
This item is before you for acceptance of the report of decisions
made by the various development related boards during the period
March 7, 1992 through March 20, 1992. The following actions were
considered during this reporting period:
Planning and Zoning Board:
-Approved a minor master plan modification which reduced
the side interior setback from 15 feet to 10 feet on
specific lots in the Windy Creek Subdivision.
Site Plan Review and Appearance Board:
-Approved the site plan (4-2 vote), landscape plan and
architectural elevations (6-0 vote), in conjunction with
the construction of a 82 space parking lot for Executive
Motors j waived the sidewalk requirement along Avenue G,
Avenue F and Federal Highway (4-2 vote)j recommended
approval of the request to defer installation of 25 foot
landscape strip along Federal HighwaYj and recommended
approval of the request to reduce the perimeter landscape
strip along the east property line from five (5) feet to
two (2) feet.
-Approved the final landscape plan in conjunction with
as-built modifications for the Drug Abuse Foundation
Residential Campus.
Historic Preservation Board:
-Approved the landscape plan, architectural elevations and
Certificate of Appropriateness for the Patio Shoppesj
approved the site plan, variance requests, and waivers (4-1
vote) .
-Approved the architectural elevation plans and granted a
Certificate of Appropriateness for the Renaissance Dental
Studio.
A detailed staff report is attached as backup material for this item.
..
..
'\
-
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
~
"" jO-~A~) ~C )C,~~
THRU:" ..~ D J. KOVACS, DIRE R
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
FROM: !::~..~ af4",
JASMIN ALLEN, PLANNER I
SUBJECT: MEETING OF MARCH 24, 1992
REPORT OF APPEALABLE LAND USE ITEMS
MARCH 7, 1992 THRU MARCH 20, 1992
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
review of appealable actions which were made by various
Boards during the period of March 7, 1992, through March
20, 1992.
BACKGROUND:
This is the method of informing the City Commission of land use
actions, taken by designated Boards, which may be appealed by the
City Commission. After this meeting, the appeal period shall
expire (unless the 10 day minimum has not occurred).
Section 2.4.7{E) of the LDRs applies. In summary, it provides
that the City Commission hears appeals of actions taken by an
approving Board. It also provides that the City Commission may
file an appeal. To do so:
1. The item must be raised by a City Commission member.
2. By motion, an action must be taken to place the item on
the next meeting of the Commission as an appealed item.
.,
"
.
City Commission Documentation
Report of Appealable Land Use Items
March 7, 1992 thru March 20, 1992
Page 3
In addition the Board recommended to the City Commission:
- deferral of the provision of a 25' landscape strip along
Federal Highway until the widening of Federal Highway or
the completion of Phase II of the development;
- reduction in the perimeter landscape strip along the east
property line from 5' to 21;
B. Approved the final landscape plan in conjunction with
as-built modifications for Drug Abuse Foundation
Residential Campus, located at the southwest corner of
Swinton Avenue and SE 4th Street (Vote 6 to 0).
No appealable items were considered by the Board. However, other
agenda items which required Board action include:
* Approved business sign for Avalanche Bar & Grill, located
at 1942 South Federal Highway.
* Approved (with conditions) business sign for Foreign Car
Engineering, located at 75 North Congress Avenue.
* Approved (with conditions) the Master Sign program for
Shoneyls, located at 969 SE 5th Avenue.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING OF MARCH 18, 1992
X. While the Board unanimously approved the landscape plan,
architectural elevations and Certificate of
Appropriateness for the Patio Shoppes, the site plan and
variance requests were approved on a 4 to 1 vote (Miller
dissenting) . The Patio Shoppes is located at the southwest
corner of Palm Square and Atlantic Avenue. The development
proposal is to allow the construction of 11,736 sq. ft. of
offices, retail and restaurant uses. The Boardls action was
conditioned with the caveat that all the approvals granted
are subject to any conditions imposed the City Commission
with regard to the closure of Palm Square.
The following lists the variances and waivers approved by
the Board:
- a variance request from Section 4.4.21(H) to reduce the
landscape setback from 10' to 5' along the east property
line.
- a variance request from Section 4.6.4(E) to reduce the
setback from 10' to 8' along the west property line and
from 10' to 51 along the east property line.
- a waiver request to reduce the right-of-way requirement
from 601 to 40'.
..
. .
LOCATION MAP FOR
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
OF MARCH 24, 1992
L-30 CANAL
WE IDA ROAD
I
~ I
CD
SW2ST
~
~ ! . ...
~ ~
2 I III III
LOWSON IOULEVAItO
I
UMTON IOUUYAItO I
I
L-3I CANAL
N
- CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
P. at Z. ITEMS: H.P.B. ITEMS: S.P.R.A.B. ITEMS:
I. - WINDY CREEK X. - PA no SHOP PES A. - EXECUTIVE WOTORS
Y. - RENAISSANCE B. - DRUG ABUSE RESIDENTIAL
DENTAL STUDIO TREATMENT CAMPUS
..
'.
.
City Commission Documentation
Report of Appealable Land Use Items
March 7, 1992 thru March 20, 1992
Page 2
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING OF MARCH 20, 1992
1. Approved minor master plan modification in conjunction with
a request for internal adjustments at the Windy Creek
Subdivision, located on the north side of West Atlantic
Avenue, between High Point Boulevard and Barwick Road. The
request involved a reduction to the side interior setback
from 151 to 10' on specific lots (Vote 7 to 0).
No other appealable items were considered by the Planning and
Zoning Board. The following items considered by the Board will
be forwarded to the City Commission as separate agenda items.
* Plan Amendment 92-1; Future Land Use Map Amendments;
Associated Rezonings; Policy and Text Amendments (Action
continued to a Special Meeting to be held on March 26,
1992).
* Rezoning, from R-I-A to CF (City Owned Property at N.W. 8th
Avenue and Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, American
Legion Facilities).
* Conditional Use Request for a Veterinary Clinic in the PC
Zoning District at the Landis Professional Plaza,
northwest corner of Lowson Boulevard and Congress Avenue.
* Conditional Use Request for a Child Care Facility in the
R-IA Zoning District - Little Lee Christian Academy,
located on the west side of SW 13th Avenue, south of SW 2nd
Street.
* Annexation and initial zoning of MH, Highland Trailer Park
Subdivision.
* Final Plat for Amoco Oil Company, located at the northeast
corner of West Atlantic Avenue and NW 8th Avenue.
* Review and Comment on Palm Beach County Future Land Use Map
Amendments, Their Amendment 92-1.
SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPEARANCE BOARD (SPRAB) MEETING OF MARCH
18, 1992:
A. Approved the site plan (4 to 2 vote) , landscape plan and
architectural elevations (6 to 0 vote), in conjunction with
the construction of a 82 space parking lot, associated
landscape improvements and approval of an existing sales
trailer for Executive Motors located on the west side of
Federal Highway between Avenues F and G. Concurrently, the
Board waived the sidewalk requirement along Avenues G and
F and Federal Highway (Vote 4 to 2).
.
City Commission Documentation
Report of Appealable Land Use Items
March 7, 1992 thru March 20, 1992
Page 4
- waiver requests to reduce the sidewalk width from S'to
4' ; and eliminate the sidewalk from the edge of the
parking lot to the south property line.
- a waiver request to reduce the required landscape strip
from 5' to 41 along the west property line adjacent to
the north parking lot.
Y. Approved the architectural elevation plans and granted a
Certificate of Appropriateness for Renaissance Dental
Studio, located at the northeast corner of NE 2nd Avenue
and 5th Street (Vote 5 to 0).
No other appealable items were considered by the Board. However,
the following agenda item required Board action:
* Certificate of Appropriateness request for perimeter
fencing for a single family dwelling at 310 N.
Swinton Avenue.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, receive and file this report.
Attachments: Location Map
JA/#65/CCDOCM.TXT
"
.
. '. ",.
LOCA nON MAP FOR
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
OF MARCH 2-4. 1992
L-30 CANAL
LAKt IDA ItOAD
I
I I
CD
SW2ST
~ ~
~ ! 1IO .
~ ~
::II i III
LOftON IOULEVAItO
I
UNTON IOUUVAItD I
L-.J' CANAL
N
- CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
P. & Z. ITEMS: H.P.B. ITEMS: S.P.R.A.B. ITEMS:
1. - WINDY CREEK x. - p...no SHOPPES .... - EXECUTIVE WOTORS
Y. - REN...ISS...NCE B. - DRUG "'BUSE RESIDENTIAL
DENTAL STUDIO TREAT~ENT CA~PUS
'.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER;t~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM it Cf.]). - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
APPROVAL OF F.O.P. COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT
DATE: April 10, 1992
This item is before you to consider approval of the collective
bargaining agreement with the Fraternal Order of Police, which was
approved by F.O.P. on April 6, 1992. If approved by the Commission,
this agreement would be in effect from October 1, 1991 to September
30, 1992.
".
.,
,. .
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM ~ q E - MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1992
REOUEST FOR TEMPORARY USE PERMIT/CONSTRUCTION COMPOUND
DATE: April 10, 1992
We have received a request from the Hardaway Company for a temporary
use permit to erect a construction compound/construction trailers on
a vacant lot located at 231 N. Congress Avenue during the 1-95
Widening Project. The proposed use would last approximately 16
months from the time of approval.
While the Chief Building Official is authorized to grant temporary
permi ts for construction trailers and compounds, that authority is
intended to relate to on-site or adjacent site facilities. This item
is being brought before the Commission because of community interest
in activities along Congress Avenue and the unique aspects of this
request (off-site facility).
Recommend approval of the request for a temporary use permit to erect
a construction compound off-site on Congress Avenue in conjunction
with the 1-95 Widening Project.
-, I,."
..
.>,
. :AV/\
v- \
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: ~,~D T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
\t \~_~~J ~ u ere
FROM: DAviD J. KOVACS, DIR~R
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1992
CONSIDERATION OF A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT FOR A
CONSTRUCTION (1-95 IMPROVEMENTS) COMPOUND
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
approval of a temporary use. The item is being considered
under LDR Section 2.4.6(H) which requires that certain
temporary uses require approval of the City Commission.
The project is an off-site construction compound for the
1-95 improvements being construction between the Yamato
Road and Linton Boulevard exchanges. The compound is to be
located at 231 N. Congress Avenue (east side, vacant,
fenced site north of the junk yard).
BACKGROUND:
Attached is a complete description of the request (letter of
March 23rd from The Hardaway Company). While the Chief Building
Official is authorized to grant temporary permits for
"construction trailers and compounds" , that authori ty is
intended to relate to "on-site" or "adjacent site" facilities
i.e. such as at the Palm Cove project on Linton Boulevard. The
Ci ty Commission has reserved the approval authority for "City
(public purpose) operated facilities".
Because of the community interest in activity along Congress
Avenue and the unique aspects of this request (off-site
facility), it has been forwarded to the City Commission for
action.
There has been no review by other advisory bodies (no such
review is required).
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approval of the temporary use for a construction
compound for work on 1-95 pursuant to the letter of March 23,
1992, from The Hardaway Company.
Attachments:
* Letter of March 23, 1992
* Site Plan
..
,.
//. .
RECEIVED
THE MAR 2 4 1992
HARDAWAY CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
COMPANY
P. O. Box 290817 P.O. Box 812469
Tampa, Florida 33687 Boca Raton, Florida 33481-2469
813.623.5877
March 23, 1992
Mr. David Harden, City Manager
City of Delray Beach
100 N. W. 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
RE: TEMPORARY USE PERMIT - CONSTRUCTION COMPOUND
CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS
Dear Mr. Harden:
The Hardaway Company requests that a Temporary Use Permit be issued for
the above referenced use of the vacant, fenced property located at 231 N.
Congress Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. This property is currently zoned
MIC, Mixed Industrial and Co.llercial.
After investigating various locations, we found this site to be the
most appropriate for our intended use during the construction of the
currently contracted 1-95 project, which begins at Linton Blvd. The
construction traffic route fro. the property will be south on Congress Ave.
to Atlantic Blvd. then east to the 1-95 southbound entrance. This route
will minimize any disruption to local traffic. (See attached map)
Pursuant to section 2.4.6(H)(2) of the Delray Beach Zoning Code, the
following information is provided:
a. Name of petitioner: The Hardaway Company
P.O. Box 290817
Taapa, Florida 33687
b. Name of property owner: Rinker Materials Corp.
P.O. Box 24635
West Pal. Beach, Florida 33416
(Notice of consent fro. owner will be provided)
c. Location of site: 231 N. Congress Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida
Property Control Nu.ber 12 43 46 18 00 000 1052
0'
'.
d. Purpose, Activity Conducted: Location of construction office
trailers, and construction co.pound for The Hardaway Co.pany during
construction of State Project No. 93220-3406 and 93220-3445 (1-95
Expansion South of Linton Blvd.)
e. Period of use: Approxi.ately sixteen .onths fro. ti.e of approval
through July, 1993.
f. Proof of ability to connect te.porary electrical service:
Temporary service will be provided by Florida Power and Light and
The Signal Group.
g. Proof of ability to provide toilet facilities: Trailers are
equipped with indoor toilet facilities and will be connected per
applicable code require.ents.
Additionally, The Hardaway Co.pany will provide a landscape screen
along the front property line (running adjacent to Congress Ave.) to i.prove
the appearance of the property and reduce the visual i.pact of construction
trailers and storage.
Attached are two copies of our proposed site plan and building per.its.
Please contact me at phone nu.ber 997-5704 should any additional infor.ation
be required to facilitate and/or expedite our request for a Te.porary Use
Permi to.
Sincerely,
THE HARDAWAY COMPANY
a~/t/. ~~
John W. Brown, P.E.
Project Manager
cc: Mr. Jerome Sanzone, Chief Building Official
Mr. Don Fecteau, Rinker Materials Corp.
Mr. J. C. Miseroy, The Hardaway Co.pany
THC, Columbus
Eng-458
File-458
e THE HARDAWAY COMPANY
'I
,
I
.. '--~~D nl)~' II t~ ~ ~ \ ..~ ~
: i ~ .W,~ ..-~HroR Q~~~.:,
.... - ---.-.-.-.~r ,r.{j; oJ
...... : ----j,:jo- -,; ;h.-~~~:-~ ;;~~-=---.
I · -.. I nN~ P'NI: nn CD f!t ~GlST -. 18~ sf
· I -. ~ ~T ~
TRI ~ '. .' > > _
~~r ; DA .t-..;... .NW.. _ .18. _ . ST..- <( 1 ( I!!!
SLV .t 1 HUMMINGBIRD IN . ~ L5.:T ~ ~ST ~ I ~~
I!J 2 SANDM'ER CIR ~ lEI
,rt P LM RIma: CT 3 BLUEBIRD IN ~ J. ST.... ~ J..!Ji. 1"t1 ~ .-
" SLV 4 flAMINGO LH ~ r- .
/: 113 ..... ~(j 6 COUNTRY M^NORS BLVD ~II:Hrl ~ r-I II !III ~~ '- ~ ~O),J\ }. "i ~
'oJ, NU :\ 8 WHIPrODRWllllN II srI ~tp.~\ ~"'!' Ir r Sf '\:ii z ~ I'
, Q "-:~'pOWlARK IN , .1' ~I 17 ~T~ '\ I ~ I n ,~ . \. \3.n,.,' .
, itfADY IN I . .. ....~ /..\ ~ , 1.- -.J~ ~
r cr MOC~INGBIRD IN U ""1'10 1 '-....01~-1~ ~~, ~ Ii: ~> j :
. .1 CARDINAL LN ~ II 10 S ~.10 s1\ST ~ I t- <II( I . ~
'1 ~ ~ " Canal r.,. a: s1~~ I~ r~;( d)' ....~ 10 \ ~ 10 ~ST- A. : l
> JU n,'" n ~ ~ ,. - (:I .,
6 "NW 8 - ,~ ~ 9 St :I~I~'-- --I~~ > ~ '~ ~L.~ '.-'i.l1i~ I C(.~~ : i
~~ cY · CT~'~ 8 S1 . CI I" ol{ ~ ~ '\.. i: ~"'FO ~~ . , I.J.J
D Sf ~ .iil >';'':.,- M,!" M ~i,............ 70'" ~ ~.... ~ " ~. . r ~ A
1.., · !D.~ "I'E ,;:.... .;1 C1 ~ I - lL , IU.I: I.~! y" t; ~'l1N 6f.\\ ~ ~ ~t.:. , ~ .
.<{ 6 g:JMl.... !-XLlR V ANf1 ID'" I~ AN 11 :R '~~AKE ~ ~~I' 'I f' ~
6~ ST ;{ ~I~~>~~ ~n:-.. V~ :.~"lJ~ UJ DOLr"Nu~ ~ SC/ ~~ ~l W~ ~/(
y;;;;J~ ~!~ ~ A\~~r, AINI=~A~~~' tL q iI.::f~ ~ ; &; '~..-p" (}....
l{:;( :;fb cr '.~ ~, "',;;: .. -<R.~1NT ~ _ N ~ ~I ~ '<:t' . ; rfV~~~
): :il 4 ~ ST_ ~L-3 DR..AI' -HI">> n '" - - .---. - --___ _I _~. f1k1F.F.' ~ ~
3 <{ CT-. ~ U1f ~ BISHOP O~:k J Can of fi. ST ST~ J
~ > I - 3: ~ ex: r I ~ 0: 01 < ~.:::.. r 12
~ Sl,l 3' Sf Iw. n ,n 0 ~"{.J ,IN H r:.:. C ~ W C POINSETI I Q ..~ 51 1_ .__ ..,.:
~ · ... ... IX) - W ~:: ~ :; nn Z BlV~~t:I I
ST_ z:z:: ~l. IJ '~, 0
~11M 2 ~ ~ ~ c ~ :3 ~ hRT' "'-VO N lI/lBAOSE 0 o! J ;;; SIT E. ;;
c. dlV[ ~ . OWpJ B ._.....
~ D ,ST ~~, ~~ a: 4 ~ EVANc OIl -" '~~'fj~ J tz~J~ an:! ~ ~
~ I:D X . X -.. CIJ . - .~ D,r..~ no; Hum, !OltH t C:T ) _
q -I' 0 n r:-l. - -J 1r _ _W
(iC:F=IIWllIll _() ~Q. ct, p: ;:>. 0 ~ .
-.J II" u: DR ;.,~ .:. I/GH ru ru cc ~ . ,-.' I ~ ~
. ~ 0 A.... .. . ~.. ,L-33 li: roo;, --,~.; a: '"'"~ lz - ~ _-.1_ Canal... g_X.1J . ,!iJ I _ _
NE DR 6 u'lo3 1llC: I ~> CT w 51;;IT-eE N.~W 2 STr/pJNO, ~--:j l( J ( ~ ~ ~
~WES DR J :: I ~-:( :TER W C1.; TER-E > ~,_,. ~"'- 1'/' '-
"DR _ 2 a: . J~:Y ~~! ~ - ol{ , I:~~""'" ~
iT DR !3 .. < I J.\ C~ ,~ f' -f' Cl ~ J S C .cs:
IVE r- CO I ~ ......-: ~._'" ~ _ .........., .
liAR D" >:hl T 5 A TLA NT; Ie'" 'A V ': 80"...... r.n",.:<' ;:
~ . .'2 S1 J (~J?'l;' 21 ..
~ SHERWOQD ~ ~ U It ~ ,,- ilE~::: >1 ~L~ ~ 'r DELRA Y 2' . 1.. ~ ~ ~.
~ PARK f.. l;; ~ _J J .Jd.dJ . ~ n BEACH (J1::O t- W . Lr:.... ~ N
...J &) w ~ Cl ..... \ :... COUNT IY , ~ a: (/) ;;.. _ _
f ~ GOLF '" ex: ~ 'l~ - .-..-.. J \YII IA ST CLU'[f, 1 ._I!)~. => =>. a~lcrn-o 1
:J: fr ~ ~ '11 ~ ~ \L ~ ~ 0 0 u. 4 ~
· ~ COURSE. -' . ~ . - ~L..r -.. I~ ~7'~ - - _ _ -?--Ir . . .. U_J:. _.t" _rn
' . L-34 ' ~ ~ I a:1 Canal ',. ~ ~ ~J1' I~
' ~ · ~ I 0 _PJAIl~ ':I: ....:) '>.1Jp (l~ U r:,'-. I_
I .... DE l'..:.... .~ E Wn' ~<~ J ;: I'-A~ fr.~. > ",.... ANnAV ~ ~ : !~ ~ I~T
9 ~ ') .{IelA' td/.:3 /<"EL'T ~ 6 . 51 ~ ::E ~ : ~
:> .l, -\ c<' r?7.! ... - ~ a: < ~..-:(
"'. HArJrET GOlF~ I ) CIISII W~ ~[!l'... - OR I/) ::: liT ..,
f COURS 'i '" . p ~ -----:-:-'" IHVERN~~' I:~' R-~t; 1/). ~ ~I
-, ~u~ 'l-l ~....... ~ _ CASITA tn Fl'AlAYAN bn ~ U..J'"" ~ "'.
,r:'lU~ ?~O:l:,-\?~~ C ~ ~. ~,,-fg C ~i FR~r8~ l~1' ~ c'- I> .......... 8 '1,
-:Z;U-N.:, ~'1 NceoElEcl_' ".~ 4SIL~OMt'T A z '''t4:;{'::~~
.' -O/).. 02 PHR tN n -' 5 Fl^,,~ VINE ~v I ~ l-
. , <::>" 0::3 CnOWfN CT =:: 'IUn~~ Ii F' N '1." ( 0
- 1)/1 ' /1 Canal a:, 4 QUI( E IN ~ f___ I WY l' 'fLJ~lrF.R on I , J ~ 0 ) W'IS'):! ~ ~ ::
-I I n..,..n.. ~. ft. "... w5 REGENCY CT ~,7n,rpJn Wv 8 RED IIIAISCUS BLVD .
I
. . . "l~N~:~~' !~ i)" ,
~'"i;, ~~t, - ',I' ':ii -+ t ,~-, ..~~
i i i
i ' I ro "/h/'
.1 I : ~ .
/SE '-
;
;C
~
~ !
, I
~~
to -
...~
)
-tJ 10,
" I ."""""
i !~~
c I ,.,....
r ~.
. A)'.
:') .
- ~
D I~
.n ~ · ~
VI 1
N ~.'.~
~ i'
:. \ ,q1il.!)"
\0 ~\ ~ "
k : ~ !f
~ ~
'-.. :i I
;~ l~ ~
"" ') ~ 1
o ~ ~~ ~
. ~ ~
- t-
, '
~
Ih.
~f . 1
?~ I '
~
(\ :( , f} cr'
o IA .... , . ~~t ~ i. i "
t ~. [ I ;.] ;. t r
1i' ~ ~fI.~ Tll."'L"ll. ;-<- f I i
N~ I
~ r, I ~Tt)'~ ""~~~!~J i :' : 1
~~ . . . ~Hp r0H I
1> J> .I ~1."~ ~r."U I g ~ .r ~ .~ ! . ....1.
.( 7fJ ~ ~ ~ if Jj .' ,
J11 ~ 1 s;.,.... "'''''';.] , II< ,
I I i
- _. -. - . _. -..-
._... E:'Xd'.",v(,-
. _.-------,-
I :~~
' ~ . --- ,
, iii' I
. . , ~
, ' Ii I ' t,.
: v~~..t ' " ~
'Z:
't
, , -
OF COUMERCE
LAKE IDA
PLAZA
CONGRESS
AVE. AUTO ....
CENTER
YU
BROTHERS
(f)
In I
P5 iC ...J
Z
0 a::
0 @
lCYZ PUT VI
:;)
"" C.E. WOLF' z
..... 2.- ST.
a::
t-
Z
u
TEMPORARY USE
COMPOUND SITE
HARDAWAY
II . .
um:IPllSU
[.A.c. ~
! .....12
'1
"
. .
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER {ll/
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i qF - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 4/ECKLER ENGINEERING
DATE: April 10, 1992
This is a service authorization in the amount of $28,800 for
design, bidding/negotiation, construction and resident project
representative services for the rehabilitation of Lift Stations 19A,
20A, 23 and 32.
In December 1991, Eckler Engineering prepared a design report for the
rehabilitation of Lift Stations #9, located on N.E. 1st Court; #19A,
located on Island Drive; #20A, located on s.w. 6th Street and S.W.
15th Avenue; #23, located on s.w. 22nd Avenue, north of S.W. 12th
Court; and #32, located at the intersection of Gardenia and Boone
Drives.
In accordance with recommendations in the design report the following
improvements are recommended:
-Lift Station #9 - convert existing air pot ejector system to a
duplex submersible sanitary pump station. Estimated
construction cost $48,600. Engineering services for Lift
Station #9 has been included in the service authorization being
prepared by PEC which relates to the Booster Station.
-Lift Station #19A - convert existing air pot ejector system to
a duplex submersible lift station. Estimated construction cost
$47,900.
-Lift Station #20A - completely demolish this two pump
submersible lift station and replace it in its entirety with a
new duplex submersible lift station. Estimated construction
cost $52,100.
-Lift Station #23 - convert existing two pump can-type station
to a duplex submersible sanitary lift station. Estimated
construction cost $61,900.
-Lift Station #32 - completely renovate this two pump conversion
station to provide more efficient operation and to meet
regulatory standards. Estimated construction cost $54,300.
Recommend approval of Service Authorization No. 4 in the amount of
$28,800 to the contract with Eckler Engineering for design,
bidding/negotiation, construction and resident project representative
services for the rehabilitation of Lift Stations 19A, 20A, 23 and 32;
with funding from Water and Sewer Repair and .Replacement -
Engineering Services (Account No. 442-5178-536-61.83).
'.
. .
- .
"
APR- 7-'32 TUE 17:14 ECKLER ENGINEERING 7552741 F'.02
E ECKLER ENGINEERING
. CONSULnNG CIVIL ENGINE€~S
April 7, 1992
215.Bl
Mr. George Abou-Jaoude
City of Delray Beach
434 S. Swinton Avenue
Delray Beach, F1 33444
Dear Mr. Abou-Jaoude:
Reference: Service Authorization Number 4
Rehabilitation of Pump Stations 19~ 20~ 23 and 32
Enclosed are five (5) signed and dated copies of proposed SelVice Authorization Number
4 for the design and construction services associated with the rehabilitation of pump
stations 19A, 20A, 23 and 32. The design of these pump stations will be in accordance with
the design report dated December, 1991 prepared by Eckler Engineering.
We propose to provide the the final design selvices for $21,600.00 as broken down by pump
station in this Service Authorization. The bidding and negotiation phases and construction
phases of this project will be billed on an hourly rate plus direct expenses basis as outlined
in Section Vll - Compensation, Paragraph ~ Method 2. The proposed maximuDl limits
on these two phases are $1,200,00 and $6,000,00, respectively.
We look forward to cOlltinuing to serve the City of Delray Beach witl} engineering seIVices
for the rehabilitation of these four pump stations. If you have any questions or require
additional information pertaining to this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
~A.~
Donald A Eckler, P.E.
Enel.
215Bl.Oll
9.."181 WEST SAMPLE ROAD . CORAl. SPRINGS, FL 33065 3051755-1351
Printed On Recycled Pap",
<.
APR- 7-92 TUE 17:15 ECKLER ENGINEERING 7:::i521'~41 P. ("3
ECKLER ENGINEERING
.
CITY Of DELRA Y BEACH
CONSULTING SERVICE AUrnORIZATION
DATE: Aj2ril 7. 1992
SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 4 FOR CONSUL TINO SERVICES
CITY P,O, NO. CITY EXPENSE CODE
PROJECT NO, = 92-102 CITY 21S,Bl ECKLER ENGINEERING
TITLE: Desiin aud Construction Services for Pump Stations 19A 20A 23 and 32
This Service Authorization, when executed, shall be incorporated in and shall become an
integral part of the Contrac~ dated November 6. 1991. between the City of Delray Beach
and Eckler Engineering.
I. PROJECT DESCRlYfION
This Service Authorization covers the design and construction services for the
rehabilitation of pump stations 19A. 20A. 23 and 32, Eckler Engineering prepared
a design report for these pump stations dated December, 1991 which will be the
design basis for these pump stations,
IL S.COPE OF SERVICES
A. Phase I - Study and Report Phase
Complete.
B, Phase 11 - Preliminary Design Phase
This work will be completed under Phase III - Final Design
Phase.
Page 1 of 4
,.
APR- 7-92 TUE 17:16 ECKLER ENGINEERING 7~.':t2i-41 P. _:'4
C. Phase III - Final Design Phase
Eckler Engineering shall provide the final design services as outlined ill the
AGREEMENT under Article III, Paragraph C, Phase III - Final Design
Phase.
D. Phase IV . BiddinglNegotiation Phase
Eckler Engineering shall provide the services outlined in .A1ticle Ill,
Paragraph Dt Phase IV - Bidding/Negotiation Phase of the AGREEMENT.
E. Phase V - Construction Phase
Eckler Engineering shall perforol the services outlined in Article III,
Paragraph E, Phase V - Construction Phase of the AGREEMENT. We will
make a maximum of ten (10) visits to the site during construction.
F. Phase VI . Resident Project Representative Services Phase
The City shall provide a Resident Project Representative on this project.
III. BUDGET
PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE AND FINAL DESIGN PHASE.
These portions of this proposal are made in accordance with Section VII -
Compensation, Paragraph A, Method 1 . Lump Sum, Page 17 of the
AGREEMENT. The design phase ends upon advertising the project for receipt of
bids.
PHASE III . FINAL DESIGN PHASE
PUMP STATION 19A. Lump Sum Fee of .............. $ 5,200,00
PUMP STATION 20A - Lump Sum Fee of ...".,....,., $ 5,700.00
PUMP STATION 23 - Lump Sum Fee of .,............. $ .5,700.00
PUMP STATION 32 - Lump Sum Fee of ......,.. ,. . . ., $ 5.000.00
TOTAL FINAL DESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $21,600.00
Page 2 of 4
.,
Hr-k- ... - '9 0;: T U E. 1,': 1 "" t:: '_' i<. L E F: E t~ G It,. E E F: It.. G 755.2"141 F' . "':15
.
PHASE IV . BIDDING/NEGOTlA nON PHASE
This proposal is made in accordance with Section VII - Compensation.
Paragraph A, Method 2 . Charges made on an hourly rate plus a direct
expenses basisl page 17 of the AGREEMENT. The services fee for this
phase shall not exceed $1,200.00 without prior written approval.
PHASE N . CONSTRUCTION PHASE
This proposal is made in accordance with Section VII - Compensation,
Paragraph A. Method 2 - Charges made 011 an hourly rate plus a direct
expenses basis, page 17 of the AGREEMENT. The services fee for this
phase shall not exceed $6,000.00 without prior written approval.
IV. COMPLETION DATE
The preliminary design phase shall be complete within 30 days of receiving a signed
Service Authorization. The fmal design phase shall be completed within 45 days
after approval of the preliminary design phase. Pemlitting will take approximately
30 days after approval of the final design phase.
This Service Authorization is approved contingent upon tbe CITY's acceptance of and
satisfaction of the completion of the services rendered in the previous phase whereas
encompassed by the previous Service Authorization. If the CITY in its sole discretion is
unsatisfied with the services provided in the previous phase or Service Authorization, the
CITY may terminate the contract without incurring any further liability. The consultant
may not commence work on any Service Authorization approved by the CrrY to be
included as part of the contract without any further notice to proceed.
Page 3 of 4
'.
APR~ 7-92 TUE 17:17 ECKLER ENGINEERING 7552741 P.06
-
.
Approved by:
CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH: ECKLER ENGINEERING
Date Date 4/7/t?f.
~A~
Signature Donald A Eckler, Owner
Print Name Witness
Title Witness
Attest State of Florida
C.ounty of Broward
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this date
Approved as to legal Sufficiency before me, an officer duly authorized in
and Fonn the state and county named above to take
acknow)edgementsl personally appeared
Donald A Eckler . known to
me to be the person in and who executed
the foregoing instrumen t, and
acknowle.dged before me that he/she
executed the same.
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRffiED before
me this day of
. 19 .
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
Page 4 of 4
'.
. MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden
City Manager
FROM: George Abou-Jaoude
Deputy Director of Public utilities
SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF PUMP STATIONS
19A, 20A, 23 AND 32
PROJECT NO. 91-102
DATE: April 1, 1992
Eckler Engineering prepared a preliminary report on the
conditions of Lift stations 9, 18, 19A, 20A, 23 and 32. (See
attached). The report was cross referenced with Hazen & Sawyer,
P.C. Wastewater Master Plan for confirming rehabilitation
recommendations.
Lift Stations 9 and 18 have now been added to the service
authorization being prepared by PEC which relates to the Booster
station.
Staff has reviewed the recommendations of the preliminary report
by Eckler Engineering. We request approval to these
rehabilitation recommendations.
GA:smm
File: Memos to City Manager
Project No. 91-102 ( D)
GAREHAB.DOC
"@{g~ 0 @~ ~[g~@~lJ
.
. [P@~
REHABILITATION OF
LIFT STATIONS
9, 19A, 20A, 23, & 32
I . - .
[F@~
iJt}{1[g <<:D'iJl? @LS I
I
[ID~[b~&y! [ID~&~OO
[F[L@~n[ID&
PREPARED BY :
8t ECKLER ENGINEERING DECEMBER 199~
., '
.
DESIGN REPORT
for the
REHABILITATION OF
PUMP STATIONS 9, 19A, 20A, 23, 32
for the
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
....
ECKLER ENGINEERING
Coral Springs, Florida
Project No. 215.BO December. 1991
.
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
PROJECT SITE NUMBER 1 . LIFr STATION 9
PROJECT SITE NUMBER 2 . LIFr STATION 19A
PROJECT SITE NUMBER 3 . LIFr STATION 20A
PROJECT SITE NUMBER 4. LIFr STATION 23
PROJECT SITE NUMBER 5 . LIFr STATION 32
CONCLUSION
..
INTRODUCTION
.
This report presents the results of the design report phase for the rehabilitation of stations
9, 19A, 20A, 23 and 32. This report provides the City of Delray Beach with specific
information for evaluating the various rehabilitation options available at each of the above
referenced station sites.
This report provides specific information and discussion for each pump station site
regarding the following design objectives: existing conditions, influent flows, rehabilitation
options, evaluation of rehabilitation options, recommendation of the best rehabilitation
option and a preliminary design ,cost estimate for the recommended option.
The context of this report is broken into five individual sections. The individual sections
will deal specifically with one separate pump station site. Each section is broken into
various sections in order to discuss the preliminary design objectives listed above.
Following the discussion of the preliminary design objectives for each station site, we have
included photographs of the existing sites and have drawn proposed site plans.
The most important objective of this design report is to provide the City of Delray Beach
with specific information regarding the rehabilitation options for these various stations.
The data collected, evaluated and presented in this report is the most up-to-date
information available and was obtained by site visits, discussions with City personnel and
preliminary topographic sUlVeys. The recommendations contained herein are based on the
evaluation of the collected data and the best engineering and economic practices currently
available. The recommendations and proposed rehabilitation programs contained in this
report have been presented to provide the City detailed information to properly evaluate.
each project site.
'.
,,'
PROJECT SITE NUMBER 1 - LIFr STATION 9
.
Existing Conditions
Lift station 9 is an existing air pot ejector type lift station located at the eastern end of N.E.
1st Court. This station selVes a residential area of approximately 18 single family homes.
The area selVed by the station does not appear to be an area where the seasonal
population influx would effect the influent wastewater flows to this station.
Inspection of this station revealed that the equipment is antiquated and requires a great
deal of maintenance for the station to operate. The precast concrete walls of the
mechanical equipment room are wet and it appears that water infiltrates through these
walls as well as through the manway of the structure. Mechanically, according to
discussions with the City of Delray Beach personnel, the station requires an abnormal
amount of maintenance compared to that which is normally expected at a standard duplex
submersible lift station.
The station is situated in the cul-de-sac pavement area near the end of N.E. 1st Court.
According to plat data obtained for this area, the right-of-way of N.E. 1st Court extends
eastward to the edge of the Intracoastal Waterway. This indicates that this station is
located within the right-of-way of N.E. 1st Court.
One particular constraint noticed which has the potential to effect the pump selection for
this rehabilitation is the power selVice availability. Power service currently availabile at this
site is single phase power as would normally be expected for a standard residential
neighborhood.
Influent Flows
Preliminary influent flow data has been established for the lift station 9 site. This existing
site has no telemetry system, therefore, recorded flow data was not available for our use
to estimate influent flow to the station. To provide a reasonable estimation of the influent
sewage flow, we assumed that each of the eighteen residences selVed by this station would
have a water demand of approximately 350 gallons per day per unit. The equivalent
sanitary flow of 75% of the water demand or approximately 262 gallons per day per unit
was used. By multiplying this sanitary flow per unit by the number of units, the
approximate influent flow to the station on an average day is 4 gallons per minute. Using
a peaking factor of 4 times the average daily influent flow, the peak flow to the station has
been estimated to be approximately 20 gallons per minute.
Rehabilitation Options
Two options were investigated for the rehabilitation of lift station 9. The first option was
to abandon the existing lift station and collection system and construct a new gravity
collection- system for N.E. 1st Court. The new gravity system would flow from the eastern
end of N.E. 1st Court to the intersection of N.E. 1st Court and N.E. 7th Avenue. The
"
second option for the rehabilitation of lift station 9 was to convert this existing air pot
ejector system to a duplex submersible sanitary pumping station.
Evaluation of Rehabilitation Options
The first option to rehabilitate this station is to replace lift station 9 with a gravity
collection system running along N.E. 1st Court to N.E. 7th Avenue. This option was
investigated in the field during the preliminary design sUIveying phase of this project. The
data collected in the field indicated that the manhole at the intersection of N.E. 7th
Avenue and N.E. 1st Court has an existing rim elevation of 10.54 feet and invert elevations
of 2.16 feet (North) and 2.06 feet (South). The terminal collection manhole of the existing
gravity system located approximately 654 feet to the east of N.E. 7th Avenue has an existing
rim elevation of 3.75 feet with invert elevations of -0.65 (west) and -3.55 feet (south).
The proposed gravity sewer collection system would be constructed of pipe with the
minimum acceptable diameter of 8-inches laid at the minimum slope of 0.4% with a
minimum cover of 30-inches. The collection pipe run length required would be
approximately 600 linear feet with the rim elevation of the proposed terminal manhole
equal to 4.31 feet with an invert elevation of 1.81 feet west. As is obvious by these
numbers, a gravity system would require the installation of a manhole with the minimum
initial invert depth at approximately 0.3 feet below the invert of the existing manhole at the
intersection of N.E. 7th Avenue and N.E. 1st Court. Analyzing this data, reversal of the
gravity flow to the west along N.E. 1st Court is not possible due to existing grades, depth
conditions and invert requirements.
The second option for the rehabilitation of station 9 is to convert the station to a duplex
submersible operation. The work required for the conversion would include:
1. The conversion of the existing mechanical equipment room to a wetwell for
submersible pump operation. This conversion will require the removal of all
existing mechanical equipment from the mechanical equipment room and
the removal of all chemical and grease residues from the interior of the
mechanical equipment room walls, floor and ceiling.
2. The repair of all damaged concrete on the interior walls of the mechanical
equipment room.
3. Grouting inverts in the bottom of the mechanical equipment room to direct
flow toward the submersible pumps.
4. Removal of the existing top of the mechanical equipment room and
replaceing it with a precast top and single leaf aluminum hatch capable of
withstanding H20 load requirements.
5. The 2onversion will also require the coating of the interior of this converted
wetwell to prevent the infiltration of groundwater. A 100% solid chemical
resistant epoxy coating material is recommended.
The proper operating volume for this wetwell will be based on pumping rates required to
maintain a minimum 2 foot per second velocity in the force main. This volume is greater
than the volume required to meet peak influent flow requirements. The preliminary
operation levels of this wetwell will be discussed following pump discussion.
The peak flow to the station has been estimated to be approximately 20 gallons per minute.
The pumping rate required to provide a minimum velocity in the existing 4-inch force main
of 2 feet per second is 80 gallons per minute. The velocity produced by this flow will be
sufficient to prevent the deposit of materials within the discharge force main. Based upon
preliminary head loss calculations, the total dynamic head required for this pump station
is approximately 20 feet. The motor horsepower requirement to meet the flow conditions
of 80 gallons per minute at 20 feet of head is approximately 1.9 horsepower.
The minimum volume required in the wetwell for flow equalization and to allow the 80
gallon per minute pumps to run for cycles of approximately 10 minutes is 800 gallons. It
is possible to provide this volume within the existing wetwell. The depth required to
provide this volume in the 7' x 5' wetwell is approximately 3 feet. The existing arrangement
of the mechanical equipment room and the nearby gravity collection manhole allows for
the station to fill to a maximum depth of approximately 5.45 feet before the existing gravity
collection system will begin to be surcharged.
Other work required for the conversion of this site includes the construction of a valve
vault with all isolation and pump check valves and emergency pump out connections, new
control panel and radio telemetry unit and all necessary piping required to connect the new
station to the existing 4-inch force main running west along the center of N.E. 1st Court.
Recommendation
Based on our observations of this project site and the determination of work required to
complete the rehabilitation of lift station 9, it is our recommendation that the lift station
be converted to a duplex submersible lift station.
Preliminary Design Cost Estimate
.
The preliminary design cost figures are based upon the best available information and the
assumptions and recommendation contained above for lift station 9. These preliminary cost
figures reflect the work required to convert lift station 9 to a duplex submersible lift station.
'I
Item Number Description Estimated Cost
.
1 Demolition of existing mechanical
equipment $ 2,500.00
2 WetweIl Conversion including interior
cleaning, repair of all holes and
cracks, filling the sump pit, grouting
new inverts and interior coating $ 5,000.00
3 Precast concrete wetwell top $ 1,000.00
4 Valve vault, 5' x 5' interior $ 1,600.00
5 Plug valves and check valves $ 2,700.00
6 4" ductile iron station and station site piping $ 2,600.00
7 Data flow remote telemetry unit $10,000.00
8 Submersible pumps, rails, accessories
access hatches, control panel & floats $12,800.00
9 Sitework including asphalt patch & sod $ 1,000.00
10 Miscellaneous construction requirements
including bypass pumping, new vent piping,
water service piping, miscellaneous electrical
and miscellaneous concrete $ 5.000.00
Sub Total $44,200.00
Contingency at 10% $ 4.400.00
PRELIMINARY TOTAL COST ESTIMATE $48,600.00
215BO#9.008
,.
I --I NORTH
I -
I SCALE: 1/81 -1' -01
. hi
Cf) h
--;
I~
W a
u
~I
u..
~
I
I
I
NEW
I VALVE I
I V A UL T I I
1411 PV I
I
I
TIE TO I EXIST MECH ROOM
EXIST FM (TO BE CONVERTED I
INTO WETWELL)
~ I
Cj J
I :::.
I I
I
I . ~NEW CONTROL PANEL I
I I
& RTU STATION
D
(bOYi @!r PROPOSED PROJ NO 215. BO
EE ECKLER SITE PLAN
ENGINEERING [ID~Il:.~A\i 1B3~A\(600 LI FT ST A 9 DATE DEe 20, 1991
'.
~.
~~---
~.~..
-' .....
.. .
-~~~~--._- . ~. /' :
~'; .-.~..... ~ - "......,.-.-;-;..<
~5.f:.~ :. -- _ _.,"'.... '.,'../... . . ~"...!'" ...
t~.'~.~~~.. - . ' -.~~~~~.;~._..,~..~ -:. ..<:;: :: ,;~>
The site of lift station 9 is located at the east end of N.E. 1st Court near the Atlantic
Intracoastal WateIWay.
\
. I
/~,' '
.
This interior view of lift station 9 shows the antiquated pot ejector type equipment.
.,'
PROJECT SITE NUMBER 2 - LIFI' STATION 19A
.
Existing Conditions
Lift station 19A is an existing air pot ejector type station located just east of the
Intracoastal WatelWay on Island Drive. This station is very similar in construction and
operation to the previous lift station 9 site. This station selVes a small residential area of
approximately 16 single family homes. The area selVed by this station does not appear to
be the type of area where the seasonal population influx would effect the influent
wastewater flows to this station.
Inspection of this station revealed that the equipment contained is antiquated and requires
a great deal of maintenance for the station to operate. The concrete walls of the
mechanical equipment room of this station do appear to be less susceptible to groundwater
infiltration than those of lift station 9. Mechanically, according to discussions with the City
of Delray Beach personnel, the station requires an abnormal amount of maintenance
compared to that which is normally expected of a standard duplex submersible lift station.
The 4-inch influent line from the collection manhole to the pump station is too small and
has a reverse slope.
Plat data obtained for this area does not reveal the existence of any type of utility easement
or right-of-way for this lift station site. It appears as though this lift station is located on
private property or lot 27 of Delray Isle. One other constraint at this site is the electrical
power selVice availability. Electric selVice available at this site is single phase power as
would normally be expected for a standard residential neighborhood.
Influent Flows
This existing lift station site has no data telemetry system, therefore, recorded flow data was
not available for our use to estimate the influent flows to the station. To provide a
reasonable estimation of influent sewage flow, we assumed that each of the 16 residences
selVed by this station would have a water demand of approximately 350 gallons per day per
unit. Approximating 75% of the water demand would be returned as sanitary flow, this
would equate to a sanitary flow of 262 gallons per day per unit. By multiplying this sanitary
flow per unit by the number of units, the approximate influent flow to the station on an
average day is 3 gallons per minute. Using a peaking factor of 4 times the average daily
influent flow, the peak flow to the station has been estimated at approximately 12 gallons
per minute.
Rehabilitation Options
Due to the geographical constraints of this site, namely the canal area just east of the
service area which isolates the service area from the surrounding areas, total gravity sanitary
sewer service does not appear to be economically feasible as a rehabilitation option.
Therefore, this option was not investigated during the preparation of this design report.
.,
The most feasible option investigated for the rehabilitation of lift station 19A is to convert
the existing operajion to a duplex submersible lift station.
Conversion Recommendations
The existing mechanical room can easily be converted into a wetwell to be used as an
equalization basin for a duplex submersible lift station operation. This conversion will
require the removal of all existing mechanical equipment, cleaning of the interior of the
wetwell to remove all chemical and grease residue as well as any loose or spalled concrete,
removal of the existing top of the structure and replacement with a precast concrete top
and hatch rated for H20 traffic loading, construction of new inverts around the bottom of
this vault and the coating of the interior for the prevention of groundwater infiltration.
Due to existing elevation constraints, the effective operating volume of this converted
wetwell will be 400 gallons. This volume will provide a pump cycle time of approximately
5 minutes at which the influent flows will dictate the station to operate approximately ten
cycles per day.
The influent flow calculations provided above indicate that the pumping requirements for
this station are 12 gallons per minute. However, this flow rate does not provide the
necessary velocities to prevent the settlement of solids in the discharge force main. In
order to provide the minimum velocity required of two feet per second, a pump discharge
of a minimum of SO gallons per minute is required. At a flow rate of SO gallons per
minute, the total dynamic head to be overcome by the submersible pumps is approximately
20 feet. Based on this information, the pumping requirements for this station will have a
capacity of SO gallons per minute at 20 feet of head and a horsepower of approximately 1.9.
The rehabilitation of this station will require the installation of pump check and isolation
valves. Typically these valves are assembled in a below grade precast concrete valve
vault. However, there is not sufficient space available at this site to construct an adequately
sized valve vault. Therefore, the required valving assembly will be constructed above grade
on the northeast side of the wetwell. A connection for emergency pump out of the wetwell
directly into the force main will also be provided as part of this above grade assembly. The
above grade piping will be painted green and landscaping features will be used to obsure
the piping from street view.
This conversion and installation of new submersible pumps will require the installation of
a new pump control panel. Along with this new pump control panel, a radio telemetry unit
will be installed for the operation and data gathering of this station.
Other work which will be required at this site to complete the conversion is the installation
of a new vent line, relocation of the water service piping as required and the construction
of additional 4-inch force main to tie the new station to the existing 4-inch force main and
the installation of a new S-inch influent line from the terminal manhole to the new wetwell.
.
Recommendation
.
Based upon the only feasible option available for the rehabilitation of lift station 19A, it
is our recommendation that this station be converted to a duplex submersible sanitary lift
station.
Preliminary Design Cost Estimate
The preliminary design cost figures contained herein are based upon the best available
information and the assumptions and recommendations contained above for lift station
19A These preliminary cost figures reflect the work required to convert lift station 19A
to a duplex submersible sanitary lift station.
Item Number Description Estimated Cost
1 Demolition of existing mechanical equipment $ 2,500.00
2 Wetwell Conversion including interior
cleaning, repair of all holes and cracks,
filling the sump pit, grouting new inverts
and interior coatings $ 5,000.00
3 Precast concrete wetwell top $ 1,000.00
4 Plug valves and check valves $ 2,200.00
5 4-inch ductile iron station and site piping
and 8-inch influent piping $ 4,000.00
6 Data flow remote telemetry unit $10,000.00
7 Submersible pumps, rails, floats, accessories,
access hatches & control panel $12,800.00
8 Sitework including asphalt patch and sod $ 1,000.00
9 Miscellaneous construction requirements
including bypass pumping, new vent piping,
water service piping, miscellaneous electrical
and miscellaneous concrete $ 5.000.00
Sub Total $43,500.00
Contingency at 10% $ 4,400.00
PRELIMINARY TOTAL COST ESTIMATE $47,900.00
215BO.009
The second option for rehabilitation of this lift station site is the complete replacement of
the lift station with a new duplex submersible sanitary lift station. There is ample space
remaining at this project site to allow for the construction of a new duplex submersible lift
station to the west of the existing lift station 20A Preliminary calculations indicate that
a wetwell with an inside diameter of 6-feet will provide sufficient storage volume to
equalize the station influent flow for proper pump operation. Based on invert elevations
of the existing manhole at S.W. 6th and S.W. 15th Avenue of 2.97 feet, the invert to the
new wetwell structure will be approximately 2.92 feet. From this point, the operation
control levels have been estimated to be as follows: high level alarm at elevation 2.42, lag
pump "on", at elevation 1.42, lead pump "on" at elevation 0.42 feet and pumps off at
elevation -2.08. The bottom of wetwell structure will be at -3.08. Existing elevations at the
site indicate that the top of the wetweIl structure will be set at approximately elevation
16.16 feet which will provide a total wetweIl depth of 19.24 feet. The walls of this precast
structure will be constructed of 8-inch reinforced concrete with a 28 day compressive
strength of 4,000 psi. Located just to the east of the wetwell structure will be a new valve
pit which will contain the pump discharge piping along with all required check valves, pump
isolation valves and emergency pump out connection provisions.
Based on influent flows discussed above and preliminary head loss calculations of 25 feet,
the required pump horsepower for this station is approximately 3.0 to 4.5 hp. However,
with more refined calculations during final design, we anticipate that this will be the
minimum horsepower requirement and the maximum will be equal to or less than 7.5
horsepower. Other work required for replacement of lift station 20A is the construction
of the new influent pipe, diameter lO-inches from the previously mentioned existing
manhole to the new wetwell site. The work will also require the installation of a new
control panel to be located at the far west end of the lift station site.
The existing lift station 20A will be dismanted following the successful start-up of the new
lift station 20A. Dismantling of the existing station will require the removal of all
mechanical equipment, removal of the concrete top of the structure and backfilling the
wetwell to grade with sand. The exterior concrete walls of the existing wetwell will be
chipped away below finished grade.
Recommendation
Based on our obseIVations at the site and the determination of the work required to
complete each of the various rehabilitation options, it is our recommendation that the best
course of action is to completely replace lift station 20A Replacement of lift station 20A
will alleviate all structural, mechanical and regulation problems currently affected by lift
station 20A The total replacement will also allow for a more maintenance free operation
of lift station 20A for many years to come.
Preliminary Design Cost Estimate
The following plleliminary design cost figures are based upon the best available information
and the assumptions and recommendations contained above for lift station number 20A
These preliminary cost figures reflect a total replacement of lift station 20A only.
."
Item Number Description Estimated Cost
1 Demolition of existing lift station 20A $ 6,000.00
2 Precast Concrete Wetwell 6-foot inside diameter
19.25 feet of depth, 8-inch walls $ 9,000.00
3 Valve Box, 5' x 5' interior $ 1,200.00
4 Plug valves and check valves $ 3,000.00
5 6-inch ductile iron station and lift station
site piping $ 4,000.00
6 Submersible pumps, rails, floats, miscellaneous
wetwell accessories, access hatches and
control pene! $14,000.00
7 Sitework, including sod, gate relocation and
fence repair and asphalt pavement patch $ 3,000.00
8 10-inch influent piping, depth 10' to 12' $ 1,200.00
9 Miscellaneous construction requirements including
water service piping, miscellaneous concrete,
electrical and bypass pumping $ 6.000.00
Sub-Total $47,400.00
Contingency at 10% $ 4.700.00
PRELIMINARY TOTAL COST ESTIMATE $52,100.00
215BO.007
..
-1 NORTH
-
X SCALE : 11 = 5'
I
I . NEW CONTROL PANEL
X & RTU STATION
(- +- - ~
Xuir=X -- x x I
X
I
I
X RELOCATED
HB GATE h
NEW I W
X I WET W
I WELL :z ~
<
en
~ I
x Cf)
I
I ~
NEW 10" DIP I
X
NEW INFLUENT \D
I VALVE
I
x 1 n W VAULT
s:
X I X I CJj
I 411PV
X I
I B' SAN 1
I EXISTING
LIFT STAT! ON
X (TO BE ABANDONED) I
TIE TO
I EXIST
I EXIST METER FM
X I
& RPV :z
<
en
(TO REMA I N) ~
X X I x X X %
I Ll- I
to
X I
CbDii'W @[F PROPOSED PROJ NO 215. 80
FE ECKLER SITE PLAN
ENGINEERING lID~Ib~A\W lBl~A\CbOO LIFT STA 20A DATE DEe 20, 1991
,I
Lift Station 20A
';;';-!t~~ '~::~~. ; - . ,(.j
. < ~t;{:.'f'll! .... ,~ I'
~>;!iI"~:;',~'!" ..~"'..
," ..:- '.' "~,..."
.:;'i'~:/'~:",;'r.~~, . "
'I .' ~-\
'. +--.
:"(
.
This photograph is of the lift station 20A site located at the intersection of S.W. 6th
Street and S.W. 15th Avenue just east of Interstate 95.
. ~
;'1;' . \.
' ~, If
0-
J f
'.- \. ., .-1:,
:..' ..~.~
.. .~-
,~' ~'~ I I.
. . I '
'. ,"~~ I
... "~'I
<. '. . . .. .
. ...... ' .~
"':,;';'~,,.~. .
-:-. ;.~. '",,"
~~
,. i .
--~" ""'.~~
.~ ~... ...... .
~'. ~..:*...
'ft., " . ..
',. .... ....
This interior photograph of the wetwell of lift station 20A shows the degradation of
the concrete structure and the improper installation of the pump discharge valving
within the wetwell.
..
PROJECT SITE NUMBER 4 . LIFT STATION 23
~
Existing Conditions
Lift station 23 is an existing two pump can-type station located within the right-of-way of
S. W. 22nd Avenue just north of S. W. 12th Court. This station selVes a typical residential
area and the Abbey Delray area. The area seIVed by this station does not appear to be an
area where the seasonal population influx would greatly effect the influent wastewater flows
to this station.
Inspection of this station revealed that the operation and the existing mechanical
equipment is antiquated and requires a great deal of maintenance for the system to
operate. This lift station site consists of a large wetwell structure constructed of brick with
an adjacent below ground steel pump structure which houses the mechanical pumping
equipment. Access to the pump can is by way of an access tube located on the inside of
a large concrete vault.
The station appears to be located completely within the right-of-way of 22nd Avenue.
Electrical power currently available at this site is 220/440 volt, 3 phase, 60 hertz power
which will be adequate for the rehabilitation of this project. The typical radio telemetry
unit seen throughout the City of Delray Beach is presently in operation at this lift station
site.
The station is located a few feet south of the southernmost property line of Abbey Delray.
The right-of-way of S.W. 22nd Avenue also ends at tbe southern property line of Abbey
Delray. This information is according to plat data obtained for tbis station during the
preliminary sUIVey phase of this project. Site constraints relative to construction at this
project site are the change in grade from the Abbey Delray area to the S. W. 22nd Avenue
area and the driveways of the two nearby entrances on the east and west side of the existing
station.
Influent Flows
Preliminary influent flow determinations have been made for this lift station 23 site. The
data used to determine the estimated influent flow to the station was that which is supplied
by report #3, Derived Flow, from the existing telemetry operation of lift station 23. The
average daily flow for the period of August 16, 1991 through August 18, 1991 was 131,791
gallons per day. The average flow for the period of November 15, 1991 through November
21, 1991 was 95,759 gallons per day. The combined average daily influent flow for these
two periods is 113,775 gallons per day. We do not expect the average influent flow to this
station to fluctuate due to the influence of seasonal populations. The higher daily influent
flow equates to an average influent flow rate of 91 gallons per minute to the wetwell of the
station. Based on the population of the area being relatively small, a peaking factor of 4
was selected as a ratio of average to maximum flow from the site seIVed by this lift station.
The peak influent flow to the station is then equal to approximately 364 gallons per minute.
,.
Rehabilitation Options
Two possible options for the rehabilitation of lift station 23 were investigated to determine
the best possible reliable sanitary sewer service option for this service area. The first option
is to eliminate lift station 23 and flow the sewage influent by gravity north to the existing
City of Delray Beach lift station 50. The second option is to convert this station to a
duplex submersible sanitary lift station.
Evaluation of Rehabilitation Options
The first option investigated was the abandonment of station 23 and flow of the sanitary
sewage by gravity to lift station 50. This option was evaluated during preliminary design
surveying phases by determining the rim and invert elevations of the final collection
manhole of lift station 23 and the final two manholes located on the north side of lift
station 50. The existing rim and invert elevations at these three locations indicate that
gravity flow from lift station 23 to lift station 50 will not be possible. However, during this
investigation it was determined that a portion of the flow going to lift station 23 can be
diverted to lift station 50. This would required the laying of approximately 140 feet of new
8-inch sanitary sewer collection piping on the north side of lift station 50.
One other existing condition noticed during the gravity evaluation was the condition of the
final manhole on the north side of lift station 50. The turbulent flows caused by force main
discharge into this manhole have created a constant generation of hydrogen sulfide. The
hydrogen sulfide has severely deteriorated the concrete walls of this final collection
manhole. It appears as though this manhole can be renovated with the application of a
gunite type cement finish followed by the application of a chemical resistant coating to
prevent the attack of hydrogen sulfides on the concrete structure.
Following consideration of the first option and determining that this option is not feasible
for this lift station site, the second option evaluated was the conversion of lift station 23 to
a submersible duplex type sanitary lift station. The rehabilitation of this station will require
at a minimum the following work.
The existing brick wetwell structure will require conversion work in order to provide for the
installation of submersible sanitary pumping units. The conversion will require the removal
of the top portion of the existing structure. Following the removal of the top slab of the
existing brick wetwell, the interior of the wetwell will be cleaned to remove all existing
solids deposits, grease and other chemical residues. Following cleaning, a new barrel
section will be constructed to bring the existing wetweIl structure to grade. The existing
inverts of this wetwell structure will then need to be regrouted in order to accommodate
the installation of the new submersible pumping units. Following invert preparation, the
interior of the existing brick walls will receive an application of chemical.:resistant gunite
material similar to that manufactured by Sauereisen Cements. The application of this
material will provide for additional structural stability as well as the prevention of
groundwater infiltration and the corrosive effects resulting from the production of hydrogen
sulfide. The final item remaining to be completed for the wetwell is the installation of a
,.
u'
new top slab with access hatch. This top slab and hatch will be constructed to provide for
support of H-20 jype traffic loadings. The preliminary operation levels that have been
calculated for this wetwell will be discussed following the pump discussion.
Referring to the section on influent flows, the peak flow to this station has been estimated
to be approximately 316 gallons per minute. Based on preliminary head loss calculations,
the total dynamic head required for this pump station is approximately 25 feet. The motor
horsepower requirements to meet the flow conditions of 364 gallons per minute at 25 feet
of head is approximately 7-1/2 horsepower. This information is based upon the
performance tables provided by Peabody Barnes.
In order to provide proper flow equalization of the influent to the wetwell and to allow for
the average pump cycle time to be approximately 15 minutes, the distance between the lead
pump "on" and pump "off' setting will be approximately 2.5 feet. The lag pump "on" depth
will be approximately one foot above the lead pump "on" depth. The high level alarm will
be approximately .3 feet above the lag pump on level. The high level alarm is equivalent
to the point at which the surrounding collection systems will begin to surcharge as a result
of the high level in the wetwell.
The conversion of this station will also require the installation of a valve vault to house
pump check and isolation valves for the discharge piping of the system. This valve vault
will be located just to the west of the existing wetwell structure. Proper location of this
vault will require some demolition of the existing concrete access vault. The demolition
work will include the removal of all mechanical equipment from the underground pump
can. Following removal of this equipment, the upper precast concrete vault will also be
removed. Once this vault has been removed, the lower portions of the pump can room will
be punctured to provide for drainage and the can will be backfilled up to the point where
the existing concrete vault structure begins. Once these items have been completed, it will
be possible to install the proposed valve vault in this area. The new valve vault installation
will also contain an emergency pump out connection.
Other work required to complete the rehabilitation of this site includes the installation of
a new control panel which will be located near the existing radio telemetry unit.
Remaining mechanical work will involve aU additional 6-inch force main required to
connect the new system to the existing 6-inch force main and the relocation of the potable
water service.
Recommendation
Based on our observations at this project site and the determination of work required to
complete the rehabilitation of lift station 23, it is our recommendation that the station be
/ converted to a duplex submersible lift station. Referencing the information stated above
that describes the conditions of the sanitary collection system on the north side of lift
station 50, we also recommend the rehabilitation of the final collection manhole at lift
station 50 and the installation of the 140 feet of new 8-incb gravity sewer to divert flow
from station 23 to station 50 in order to avoid a double pumping situation.
.
"
Preliminary Cost Estimate
The preliminary cost figures are based upon the best available information and the
assumptions and recommendations contained above for lift station 23. These preliminary
cost figures reflect the work required to convert lift station 23 to a duplex submersible lift
station. These figures do not include the cost for the work recommended as described for
lift station 50. We do anticipate, however, that the work recommended for lift station 50
would be about $12,000.00.
Item Number Description Estimated Cost
1 Demolition of existing mechanical
equipment room, removal of concrete
vault and backfilling of equipment
room. $10,000.00
2 Wetwell conversion including removal
of top section, rehabilitation of the
interior brick walls, regrout inverts,
interior cleaning and interior coating. $15,000.00
3 Precast concrete wetwell top $ 2,000.00
4 Valve vault, 5' x 5' interior, 8-inch walls $ 1,200.00
5 Plug valves and check valves $ 2,800.00
6 6-inch ductile iron station and lift station
site piping $ 4,800.00
7 Submersible pumps, rails, floats, accessories, access
hatches and control panel $14,000.00
8 Sitework including asphalt patch and sod $ 1,500.00
9 Miscellaneous construction requirements including
bypass piping, new vent piping, water service
piping, miscellaneous electrical and
miscellaneous concrete $ 5.000.00 .
Sub Total $56,300.00
Contingency at 10% $ 5,600.00
PRELIMINARY TOTAL COST ESTIMATE $61,900.00
215BO.010
..
o
I
,
::t: --
D
~ -
CD
c:r: -
--
o
. z W
-I
-<
U
(f)
X
-X-
-X-
-X
X-
-X-
X- -X- -X- 0 [ yNEW CONTROL PANEL
NEW VALVE VAULT _1_
/_-,
'\
I cb '\
I (
o ~\ I I J
61FU 't(//
- ... , -/ ::..::
- EXIST WETWELL ~
EXIST VAULT, (TO BE CONVERTED ~
(TO BE FOR SUBMERSIBLE ~
REMOVED) PUMP USE) ~
Ln
I
I
I
::..::
-I
-<
:x
w
CI
(f) I
u
z
o
u
,
Ln
S. W. 22ND A VENUE
(b n Vi @[F PROPOSED PROJ NO 215.80
~ ECKLER SITE PLAN
Lf::. ENGINEERING lID~l1.~A\i m~A\(bOO LIFT STA 23 DATE DEe 20, 1991
'.
~.
. .
..~.."~
l~
.T- .. - ~...: ~
~ -- ~
-' ~~~':'-;:""";':' .~,~, .";', -. -.~~,~...:, . ~ "-,>
..
" ' . .,,' ~
~"'. '-'
This site is located in the right-of-way of S. W. 22nd Avenue just north of S. W. 12th
Cou rt.
This interior view of the pump can of lift station 23 shows the rusting and corroded
areas of the rim as well as the old equipment currently in service.
'.
PROJECT SITE NUMBER 5 - LIFf STATION 32
Existing Conditions
Lift station 32 is a two pump submersible conversion station located at the intersection of
Gardenia Drive and Boone Drive. A more specific location for this station is 914 Gardenia
Drive. Originally, this station was an air pot ejector type and has since been converted to
the current submersible duplex operation. The station serves a residential area of single
family residences and small multi-story condominium units. The condominium units appear
to be seasonal which creates additional influent wastewater flow during the winter months.
Inspection of this station revealed that the submersible conversion was completed by the
removal of the air pot ejector equipment and the installation of submersible pumping units
in the four foot diameter access manway of the structure. By doing this, the pump
installations are very crowded and require that the pump discharge piping and valving be
located in the wetwell structure. The structure appears to be in good shape structurally,
however, there are some minor spalled areas and other minor cracks which will need to be
repaired. Mechanically, according to discussions with City personnel, all mechanical and
electrical features on the interior of the wetwell are in need of replacement.
The rehabilitation of this lift station should also address conditions of the existing operation
which do not conform to state and local regulations. All discharge valving from the
submersible pumps is located within the wetwell and there are no provisions for emergency
pump out connections.
One other item which needs to be addressed during the rehabilitation of this station is the
location of the existing radio telemetry unit and pump control panel. These items are
located in very close proximity to Gardenia Drive and should be relocated to the south side
of the wetwell structure.
During preliminary survey work at this project site, it was determined by review of available
plat data that the right-of-way of Gardenia Drive is 50 feet wide. The location of this
station as determined by survey crews in the field during the preliminary surveying phase
indicates that the existing mechanical features of this station are located within the 50-foot
right-of-way of Gardenia Drive.
Influent Flows
Preliminary influent flow determinations have been made for this lift station 32 site. The
data used to determine the estimated influent flow to the station is that which is supplied
by report 3, Derived Flow, from the existing telemetry operations of lift station 32. The
average daily flow for the period of November 15, 1991 through November 21, 1991 was
31,105 gallons per day. The average flow for the period of November 29, 1991 through
December 12, 1991 was 32,809 gallons per day. The combined average daily influent flow
for these two periods is 31,957 gallons per day. We do expect the influent flows to this
station to increase with the arrival of seasonal residents during the winter months. In order
to estimate this influent sewage increase, we have increased the influent flow by 40%. This
equates to an average daily influent flow rate of approximately 31 gallons per minute.
Based on popuhltion of the area being in the range of 1,000 to 2,000 residents, a peaking
factor of 4 was selected as a ratio of the average to maximum flow from the site served by
this lift station. The peak influent flow to the station is then equal to approximately 125
gallons per minute.
Rehabllftation Options
Two options were investigated for the rehabilitation of lift station 32. These options were
the total replacement of lift station 32 or the renovation of lift station 32. The renovation
work would consist of corrections to the existing submersible system as far as proper pump
installation and to bring the station into compliance with the current regulations.
Evaluation of Rehabilitation Options
The first option is to replace lift station 32 with a new submersible duplex sanitary lift
station. The location of this station with respect to the existing Gardenia Drive and the
nearby residences would make this option difficult to complete. The project site is small
and would not accommodate the installation of a second lift station adjacent to the existing
lift station. The replacement option would require the total demolition and removal of the
existing lift station 32 and replacement with a new lift station. It is anticipated that the
removal of the existing lift station would require the substantial renovation of the
surrounding area including portions of Gardenia Drive and the majority of the nearby
private concrete driveway.
The second option investigated for the rehabilitation of lift station 32 was the renovation
of the current submersible operation. The work required to complete this renovation
includes the renovation of the existing wetwell, installation of new pumping equipment,
construction of a new valve pit, installation of a new pump control panel and relocation of
the existing radio telemetry unit. More specifically, the requirements of this work are as
follows.
The renovation of the existing wetwell requires some demolition of the existing structure.
The demolition will include the removal of the 4-foot diameter entrance tube and the roof
slab of the existing converted mechanical room. Following this work, new barrel sections
would be installed to bring this wetwell area back to grade. The barrel sections would be
the full diameter of the equipment room rather than the small diameter as being utilized
now for the pump installation area. The interior of the wetwell would be thoroughly
cleaned to remove all solids, grease and other chemical residues that have accumulated in
the station. The existing inverts at the bottom of the station would have to be
reconstructed in order to accommodate the new pump installation locations. During the
regrouting of inverts, all holes, cracks and other spalled areas of concrete on the interior
of the wetwell will also be patched with a grout type material. Following all grouting
operations the interior of the wetwell will then be coated with a material to prevent the
infiltration of groundwater and to protect the interior concrete walls from the corrosive
..
effects of hydrogen sulfide. The final item of work to properly convert this wetwell is the
installation of a new precast concrete top and access hatch.
As stated above under influent flows, the peak influent flow to this station is 125 gallons
per minute. However, a pump flow at this rate will not produce the required minimum two
foot per second velocity in the existing 6-inch force main. Therefore, pumping rates from
this station will need to be increased to a minimum of 180 gallons per minute. The velocity
produced by a flow at this rate will be sufficient to prevent a deposit of materials through
the existing force main. This increased flow requirement will require more storage capacity
in the wetwell to provide for a uniform pumping rate. This required capacity for the
effective wetwell volume is approximately 385 gallons. The existing elevations of the
bottom of the station as well as influent piping inverts are sufficient to provide this storage
volume. Based on preliminary head loss calculations, the total head which will be needed
to be overcome by the pumps in the station is approximately 30 feet. The anticipated
horsepower required to meet these pumping conditions is 7-1/2 hp.
The renovation of this station will require the installation of new pump check and isolation
valves. Typically these valves, along with an emergency pump out connection, would be
installed in a precast concrete vault adjacent to the wetwell structure. Due to site
dimension constraints, the installation of an appropriately sized valve box would encroach
on the nearby private concrete drive. The appropriately size valve box of interior
dimensions 5' x 5' allows for ease of valve installation and maintenance, but will require
encroachment into the existing drive.
There are other possible options. One is to decrease the size of the valve box. This option
will remove the vault from the drive area, but will increase valve installation and
maintenance problems due to space constraints. A third option is to install the valving
above grade as described in lift station 19A Our recommendation is to construct the
proper valve vault. The impact on the property owner's drive can be minimized by setting
the top at the driveway grade and installing an H20 load bearing hatch. A final decision
on this .can be made during the discussion of this design report or during the final design
phase. . The final determination must address the property owner's concerns as well as
installation, operation and maintenance.
Another feature which will require minor renovation work is the installation of a new pump
control panel and the relocation of existing radio telemetry unit and antenna system. These
items need to be moved to the south side of the renovated wetwell structure and adjacent
to the sputhernmost right-of-way line of Gardenia Drive.
Minor work which will be required to complete the work at this project site will include the
relocation of the existing potable water service piping, additional6-inch force main required
to connect the new system to the existing 6-inch force main, the repair of damaged
driveway and roadway pavement areas and all required landscaping work.
.
Recommendation
.
Due to the site constraint limitations such as the close proximity of Gardenia Drive and the
nearby residences, we recommend that this station be renovated as described above.
However, the renovation of this station is nearly a total reconstruction which would be
similar to that which was recommended for lift station 20A
Design Cost Estimate
The design cost figures are based upon the best available information and the assumptions
and recommendations for lift station 32. These preliminary cost figures reflect the work
required to rehabilitate the existing duplex submersible pump operation of lift station 32.
The cost of rehabilitating this pump station is as follows:
Item Number Description Cost Estimate
1 Demolition of upper portions of
existing wetwell and removal of all
mechanical equipment $10,000.00
2 Wetwell conversion including new
additional barrel sections, repair
of all cracks, holes and spaUed
concrete, grouting of new inverts,
interior cleaning and interior coating $10,000.00
3 Precast concrete wetwell top $ 2,000.00
4 Valve vault, 5' x 5' interior, 8-inch walls $ 1,200.00
5 Plug valves and check valves $ 2,800.00
6 6-inch ductile iron station and lift
station site piping $ 2,400.00
7 Submersible pumps, rails, floats and
accessories, access hatches & control panel $14,000.00
8 Sitework including asphalt pavement patch,
concrete drive repair and landscaping $ 2,000.00
10 Miscellaneous construction requirements
including bypass pumping, water service
piping, miscellaneous electrical and
miscellaneous concrete $ 5.000.00
Sub Total $49,400.00
Contingency at 10% $ 4.900.00
PRELIMINARY TOTAL COST ESTIMATE $54,300.00
'.
-I NORTH
-
I I SCALE: tle'-i/-O'
. I
I
I
I
CONCRETE ~
I
I ~
I gs
IZ
-<
en ~
Co
~
RELOCATED I ~
RTU STA W
~
0::;
I ~
I CJ
EXIST WETWELL
NEW CONTROL 0 (TO BE REHABILITATED)
PANEL
8' SAN a'SAN
I
CONCRETE
Z
I~
Co
10'WM
::JC
to
I
(6D'ii'\'1 @/F PROPOSED PROJ NO 215. 80
FE ECKLER SITE PLAN
ENGINEERING @(gll..~~\'1 lBJjg~(61J{1 LIFT STA 32 DATE DEe 20. 1991
,.
Lift Station 32
~
.. ,-._. .~~~. r
'. " . ',.."," . , . ..~
::~.' ,; ~~. ,,' '~';:,:.:~~: .:'.:.t':;~:';~, ~: ...... '::~~'~,i~7;\;L." .
'''-... . , ". ,,', , ~ _.-. ..... . ".". ;~""" ',"'., .-':....~a4.~.r.
-.... ., "..r-c." '. L~', . -,. ........ "..~'" ". . '." .... .', .,-,,,0-.'''' '" T'" . '.~
This photograph shows the existing lift station 32 site at 914 Gardenia Drive.
" . \
.-',",
\
\
\
\
\
- I
- -
...
,
,
.;. \j !
," ,-'" '\
..,,~ ,," ...- ,
~..... . . -~ r
' ... . I
. - . ~~"... !
t.t ' ''1 /
., .:,~ -
~.,. ....:..~~'~.
.~~,.
_I.~
~. ~.
.~', \. :
.w;" ") _ ... "...:
This interior view of the wetwell of station 32 shows the improper crowded
instaJJation of the pumping unit in the small 4' diameter access way to the wetweIl.
'f
CONCLUSION
.
The following is a station by station summary of the rehabilitation recommendations and
preliminary cost data contained in this report.
Lift Station 9
Recommendation: Convert existing air po't ejector station to a duplex submersible
lift station.
Preliminary
Cost Estimate: $48,600.00
Lift Station 19A
Recommendation: Convert existing air pot ejector station to a duplex submersible
lift station.
Preliminary
Cost Estimate: $47,900.00
Lift Station 20A
Recommendation: Total replacement of existing station with new duplex
submersible lift station.
Preliminary
Cost Estimate: $52,100.00
Lift Station 23
Recommendation: Conversation of existing pump can station to a duplex
submersible lift station.
Preliminary
Cost Estimate: $61,900.00
Lift Station 32
Recommendation: Rehabilitation of existing duplex submersible operation to
provide more' efficient operation and to meet regulatory
standards.
Preliminary
Cost Estimate: $54,300.00
Based on the recommendations and preliminary cost estimates described above, the total
preliminary cost estimate for this project is $264,800.00.
"
. .
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
.t-
FROM: CITY MANAGER .'v
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM ~ 9 . ~. - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
AWARD OF BID-GULFSTREAM BOULEVARD BEAUTIFICATION
DATE: April 10, 1992
This item is before you to disqualify the low bidder, waive the
City's claim for the 5% bid security for Triple A, and award the
bid to Florida Blacktop, Inc. for the installation of landscaping
materials in the medians on Gulfstream Boulevard between Seacrest
Boulevard and Dixie Highway.
The low bid was submitted by Triple A Irrigation and Landscape. We
have since received a letter from them asking that they be released
for the bid on the above project. The basis for this request is that
Triple A misunderstood what was said at the pre-bid conference and
therefore left some of the miscellaneous items out of the bid.
Additionally, they have requested that their bid bond of $594.67 be
returned.
Staff has reviewed this request and recommends that Triple A
Irrigation and Landscape's bid be disqualified and that the City
waives it's claim for the surety. Additionally, staff recommends
that the bid be awarded to the second low bidder, Florida Blacktop,
Inc. in the amount of $15,490.
Recommend disqualification of low bidder, Triple A Irrigation and
Landscape; waiver of the City's claim of $594.67 surety; and award
the bid to Florida Blacktop, Inc. in the amount of $15,490 with
funding from 1987 Utility Tax - Gulfstream Boulevard (Account No.
333-4141-572-61.38).
"
. .
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
THROUGH: Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager/ I~
Administrative Services
FROM: Ted Glas, Purchasing Officer ~/r
DATE: April 8, 1992
SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING -
APRIL 14, 1992 - BID AWARD - BID # 92-32
GULFSTREAM BOULEVARD - LANDSCAPING
Item Before City Commission:
The City Commission is requested to award a contract to Florida
Blacktop Inc. , at a total cost of $15,490. Per the Finance
Department, funding is from:
( ) .
Background:
Funds were allocated in the FY 91-92 budget for landscaping of
Gulfstream Boulevard. A total cost of $ was budgeted
for this project.
Scope of Service - Installation of landscaping within the medians on
Gulfstream Boulevard (between Seacrest Boulevard and Dixie Highway).
Bids for this project were received on March 27, 1992, from five(5)
contractors, all in accordance with City purchasing procedures. (Bid
#92-32. Documentation on file in the Purchasing Office.) A
tabulation of bids is attached for your review.
The low bid was submitted by Triple A Irrigation & Landscape. Their
bid has deficiencies as outlined in memo from City
Horticulturist/Special Projects Coordinator, and letter from Triple A.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends
(1) Disqualify the low bidder, Triple A Irrigation & Landscape,
due to apparent bid deficiency.
(2) Waiver of the City's claim for the 5% bid security.
(3) Award the contract to second low bidder, Florida Blacktop,
Inc., at a cost of $15, 490. Funding as outlined above.
Attachments:
Tabulation of Bids
Memo from Community Improvement
Letter from Triple A Irrigation & Landscape
pc: Lula Butler
Nancy Davila
"
...
M E M 0 RAN DUM
To: Ted Glas, Purchasing Administrator
From: Nancy Davila, Horticulturist/Special Projects Coordinator ~~
Re: RECOMMENDATION FOR AWARD OF BID # 92-32
GULFSTREAM BOULEVARD - LANDSCAPING
Date: April 8, 1992
I have reviewed the bids for the installation of the landscaping for
Gulfstream Boulevard and recommend that the bid be awarded to Florida
---- -
Blacktop Inc., the second lowest bidder, in the amount of $15,490.00.
The lowest bidder, Triple A Irrigation, has asked that they be released from
the bid, in that, they had misunderstood information given at the pre-bid
meeting relative to additional fill needed in the medians.
Triple A has submitted a letter requesting that they be released from the
bid, and further requesting that the City waives their claim for the surety,
which was 5% of the bid amount ($11,893.50) which amounts to $594.67.
In speaking with Jeff Kurtz, City Attorney, he indicated that the following
action would be needed by the City Commission:
l. Disqualify the lowest bidder, Triple A, due to apparent bid dificiency.
2. Waiver of the City's claim for the 5% surety.
3. Award the bid to the second lowest bidder. , Florida Blacktop, Inc. ,
I initially had some concern as to whether Florida Blacktop would be
elligible for the bid, since we restrict the amount that can be
subcontracted to 20% of the job. Florida Blacktop has stated that they have
a landscape division within their company and has supplied a payroll listing
that appears to substantiate their ability to perform the landscape work 'in
house' .
Florida Blacktop was the Contractor who did the road work and landscape
installation at the Del-Ida Traffic Intersection, and we have no complaints
with the work that was done.
,.
(') -t ()\ (J1 tN ~I ~ ::I
.:. N D
0 0 . ,= fT1 ::0
::I -t ::I (')
.., ::I I> :c
fT1 r
Z 3"""I> NlD ro N(/) tN3 ....::0 0 N
-t r C::OO ....I> D~ ':'''0 (J1D 00 fT1 -J
. (/) C rfT10 . :c ZD 01-< :c -< (/) .
...... 3 (')31-< (J11-< -t::O 0 fT10 fT1I> (')
fT1 "0 :CO-t OI> I>"'" fT10 I>(;) I>r ::0 ....
X . <I-< 0 Z I>fT1 (,)I> (') I-< -.D
(') (/) fT10 (/) I>-< (')::0 :CZ :c"O "0 -.D
fT1 C fT1 Z (/)0 fT1 :c -< 0 -t N
"0 3 -t0I> 0 Ir r I-< I-<
-t (')rr ..." r I-< -t Z 0
I-< lD 0 t.. 0 r ::0 (') Z
0 I-< "'" fT1 CD:I: -< fT1 I-<
Z 0 l./lX 0 fT1 I>
(I) 0"0 Z
.. 0fT1 fT1 D
. Z I>
(I) (')
..."fT1 :c
I-<(/)
r
r
.
Dl :l:l > > ... 0) N' 0'\- O'\N U. .... - .... Il"';:{
en .... Co n 0 00 0'\' W, \O~ 0)0)
en Cog-a- .... 0 ~\O u.~ 0'\0'\ u.o 00 s;'~
- . N \J1 U. . U. o. O'
= :l:l :l ~ . 0 . 0 0 . 0 . 0 :l ....
'1 0 Co 0) 0 VI ...... 0...... 0...... 00 00 Co~
~ 0 = ..... \0 0 0 0 ~ >
/'t Co a ~ W ...... ......
'< Co . ~ ....
en ....1lCl VI ~ '1
= .... III 0
C" Co '1
....
e. IlCl (;)
Dl
/'t /'t C
/'t .... r
~ g -.,
Co (/)
-t
Ql:l:l>> ... N W' 0'\.... ~w ~ N NN ","'I;l ::0 (')
en .... Co n . . - 0'\' N' . 0 . 0 :l ..... fT1 I-<
c.c.a- .... 0 01>- u.~ 00 00 00 n 0 I> -t-t
U. \D - . U. 0 o. o. , '1
~:l:l~~ . u. 0...... 0 0 00 00 ,... 3 D-<
'1 0 C. I>- , , 0...... 0...... . 0 . 0 C. lD
~ :l = '""' \0 0 0 0 0 Dl lD CO
'"' c. a f') 0 0 0 0...... 0...... OlDr-.,
'< c. . :l:l
CIl ....1lCl 0 '""' CI-<I>
= .... ~ 0 Dl rO-tO
C" c. n fT1 1-<fT1
l!- I'\" <=or
/'t D-.DZ::O
/'t 0
/'t ..., ;eN D
~ o I 0-<
c. tN-.,
f-- IN lD
Ql:l:lit> ... w N' -N ~w 0'\.... .... - ~ot lDfT1
CIl.... n . . .... . . N' . 0) . 0) r I-< I>
c.c.a- - 0) 1>-_ 0""' 00 I>-VI 0l\J1 "'..., I> 0(')
0'\ \0 ""' \Jl I>-VI , 0 -.J . VI' Z (/):c
~tll~~ . VI N U. 0 \Jl0 00 :l:l 0
'10c. ~ . . ...... . ...... 0...... . 0 . 0 '1 (/)
III :l Ii '""' u. 0 \Jl 0 0 0 ~ (')
/'t C. III -.J 0 0 0 0...... 0......
'< c. . n D
CIl ....1lCl \Jl ::r "0
= _ III 0 .....
C" C. ~~ Z
I!- (;)
'"'
/'t f')
~ ~
c.
\Iltllit> .. VI N' ....N ~w 0'\- - ... ~~
CIl.... n . . ... . . 0'\ ' . \0 . \0
C. C. a- ... N ...0 00'\ O)N 1.0\0 \ON '1=
CIl ~ 0) \Jl \Jl OVl 0 0)' N' CIln
~g'g,~ . N 0...... ~ 0 N\Jl u.u. 3;-
0 . . . ...... 0...... . 0 0
f') :l Ii '""' 0) ~ :;) 0 \Jl 0 ....
/'t C. ~ \Jl 0'\ 0 0 0...... 0...... '1
'< C. . ;Os;'
~ ....1lCl N
....f') 0'\ no
C" C. 'c.
It CIl
n
/'t Dl
/'t ...,
f') ~
Co
NN
01 tll ~ Ol u.. \ON -~ \ON . 0'\ >
en .... . . N 0). . ~ 0'\0 '"
C. N ~ wu. I Ol 0'\ ou. 0'\\Jl O' N
CIl ":l) u. ~ '0 010 N' 00
= tll . 0 u. ...... :;) 0 U.O 0 =
'1 0 l>- . . 0...... ...... 0 0 =
~ :l - 0 0 0 0 0...... ,...
/'t C. " 0 0 0 0...... ...
'< , Co
~ 0 ~
0 '1
C" CIl
a I .
,...
/'t ....
/'t I :l
~ n
c. I
I I
.,
- ~
. .
. Pump6 . LAWN SPRINKL.ERS . Wa/lb
.I ,
i" . A I R R IG AT 10 N
TR I P l E . IN~TALLATIONS - · REPAIRS )
T . SERVICE
(407) 793-1600
MlIn-.h :H. J 992
<';Jty 1)[ Delray Buaeh
Al'TN: Nancy Dt!'Jllla
WO NW Itll Ave
I)d ray Bcdch, }"L j3444
Kc: l1uJlstrcant l\oul~VdtU untll:Jcapc Bid
De'IH Nttnt:)' I
1nis letter is u request to be released from our bid on the dbvve projc~'l.
We misunderstood what was said at the pre bid conference and therefore left
some or the miscellaneous items out of our bid. We would appreciate being
allowed to withdraw our bid without prejudice and have our bid bond returned.
We look forward to the time when we can work w1lh you agall1. 1 I:cmall1,
fH nc\.'rl'ly I
~J.~~-:J~t>
E~ R. 5amue 80 ._..~
I'l'e"tdenl.
11 dQR PiArAnn RI1 C?7 . (:nmmart"'A &.1!:l1r" . \J\JA~t ~alm RoOl"'~ C:I ~ .~ A I A
"
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
r
FROM: CITY MANAGER - rJ
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i 'f H - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
MODIFICATION TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT/TRAFFIC SIGNALS
DATE: April 10, 1992
This item is before you to discuss and provide direction to staff
with regard to a proposal from Palm Beach County to modify the 1987
interlocal agreement with the City to provide that the City will pay
for the installation of new traffic signals.
The agreement currently in place, a copy of which is attached,
provides that the County will install and maintain these signals at
no cost to the municipality. Under the proposed modification the City
would be responsible for payment for any new traffic signals which
are required to be installed. Palm Beach County would continue to
fund the maintenance of all existing traffic signals and the
maintenance of new ones.
On one hand, this could be considered a matter of little consequence
since we do not foresee a need for additional signals except at
Germantown Road and Linton Boulevard. However, each signal does cost
$40,000 - $50,000, and the County has agreed to pay these costs. On
the other hand, if we take back this responsibility, then we regain
more control over our own destiny. If we take it back, we need to
get something in return from the County.
I recommend responding that we would be willing to take back
responsibility for paying these costs if the County would extend the
current agreement on allocation of gas tax revenue for another ten
years.
'.
-
. .
"
,-,I _.I '-';/~,-.':~
Board of County Commissioners PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL " <;~ L ~
SERVICES: Please comment. D. ~
Karen T. Marcus, Chair , (j~ c..~ r1,.)J j n
Carole Phillips, Vice Chair CITY CLERK: Schedule fo~ 3/. ~
C I A R b t meet~ng. 'l~~.
aro . 0 er s ."
'01 J. Elmquist wdl ~ d.w,u/~.IA.. @
,dry McCarty .,/2fc DSK(, TJ1t.3b,
Ken Foster
Maude Ford Lee
EO
March 10, 1992 liAR 121992
CiTy M.
~NAGER'(\
" OFFICE
David T. Harden
City Manager
City of Delray Beach
100 N.W. First Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Dear Mr. Harden:
I am sure you know there exists between Palm Beach County and the City of Del ray
Beach an Interlocal Agreement concerning responsibility for traffic signals,
whereby Palm Beach County maintains and installs these signals at no cost to the
municipality.
As part of a program to address the significant deficit from the 1992-1993
budget, it has been suggested that this agreement be modified such that each
municipality would accept the responsibility for payment for any new traffic
signals which are required to be installed. Palm Beach County would continue to
fund the maintenance of all existing traffic signals and the maintenance of new
traffic signals after they are installed.
It is respectfully requested that you provide me with your position concerning
this proposal. For your information, a similar letter is being sent to all
municipalities having similar agreements with the County. Your cooperation and
assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
s~~
Robert Weisman
County Admi n is t rator , " ~_ J"
RW:te " ..~""";?~\.
.....:"!~ \'- ,,:\ \\
, ,-..\t',' '\ \', \~ ~'.'
~ .,.,.. ('''''' \~ .. \I,) :..-.;.. (..::.:~ ,-."
cc: George 1. Webb, P. E., County Engi neer . ......,.,'. ,~,\','~/ -
Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.L, Acting Assistant County\~ng.ineer ,.~...'ti~7..
\ .,' . \...'V .
\: \,./;,;:. \~',(\
Ii' "':', ,...' ,'"", ", .'_;-~\ \. \. .
,..,_1 \\'. .
" ''-. \ ,
yo.' ....", ,
<....1
.. :\n Equal Opportunity - ,,\Hirm.nivc ;\l:tion Employcr"
BOX 1989 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402-1989
:1f1n1ed on recvcled DaDer
"
.
, . County Administrator
Board of County Commiaionen Jan Winters
Carol A. Roberts, Chair Oepartment of Engine,
. Carol J. E1nquisto~ - _,: ,. and Public Works
Karen T. Marcus . H. F. Kahlert
Dorothy Wilken County Engineer
Kenneth M. Adams
March 24, 1987 r
\ '41 4/,
Commissioner Carol A. Roberts APPROVEO BY aOARD
MIl.R 2 4 1987 _~)
Chair and Members of the
Board of County Commissioners .........-
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION - AGREEMENT BETWEEN PALM BEACH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
TO PROVIDE CERTAIN TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES, AND FOR PALM
BEACH COUNTY TO ASSUME THE MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITHIN
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH.
COMMISSIONER DISTRICT NUMBER 4
Commissioners:
The City of Delray Beach has requested Palm Beach County to provide certain traffic
engineering services and to assume responsibility for the installation and maintenance of
traffic signals within the City of Delray Beach. A Traffic Engineering Agreement
accomplishing this request was executed by the City of Delray Beach on January 13, 1987,
and is attached hereto.
The primary points covered in this agreement are as follows:
1. Palm Beach County wi 11 have jurisdiction for traffic control on County
roads within the City of Delray Beach.
2. Palm Beach County will assume the responsibility for maintaining and
installing traffic signals within the City of Delray Beach.
3. The City of Del ray Beach agrees to coordinate with Pal m Beach County the
review of all developments which would generate any traffic impact of
consequence on major roadways.
4. The City of Delray Beach will provide Palm Beach County financial support
in the amount of $40,000.00 annually for a period of five years. Once
these payments are made, no further remunerat i on wi 11 be required of the
City.
The reasons that this agreement is being recommended for approval are as follows:
1. This is a continuation of the. Board's policy adopted on April 16, 1977 ,
which states "Palm Beach County is to assume the responsibility for
construction and maintenance of signals within municipal limits subject to
a rec i proca 1 agreement by which the municipality relinquishes control of
the respective transportation facility." Palm Beach, County currently has
similar agreements with twelve (12) municipal Hies, and currently has
jurisdiction over most of the traffic signals within the County with the
exception of the City of Belle Glade, The City of Boca Raton, and the Town
of Palm Beach.
.. An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer
BOX 2429 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402-1989 (305) 684-4000
"
Commissioner Carol A. Roberts
March 24, 1987 -
page 2
2. The traffic signal installation and maintenance function is one which can
be readily and efficiently accomplished at the County level and is a
service which Palm Beach County can logically provide to the Cities as a
counter to the "dual taxation" issue.
3. The Florida Department of Transportation has scheduled and prel iminarily
funded $4 million over the next five years for the installation of a
county-wide, centralized, computer-controlled traffic signal system. It is
the recommendation of the consultant's report that Palm Beach County be the
responsible agency for the operation of this county-wide system.
A R~solution approving this Agreement has been prepared and attached to this letter. It
is respectfully requested that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the Resolution and
execute the Agreement.
Sincerely,
H. F. Kahlert, P.E.
cOUnvngineer
. ~
HFK:CRW:CRM:tg
Attachments: Intergovernmental Agreement
Resolution
.
"
APR 8'1981'
.. County Administrator
Board of County Commi..ionen Jan Winters
Carol A. Roberts, Chair Department of Enginer
Carol Elmquist and Public Works
Karen I. Marcus H, F. Kahlert
Dorothv Wilken . County Engineer
Kenneth M. Adams
April 4, 1987
Gerald Church, P.E.
City Eng i neer
City of Delray Beach
100 N.W 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
RE: AGREEMENT BETWEEN PALM BEACH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
TO PROVIDE CERTAIN TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES, AND FOR PALM
BEACH COUNTY TO ASSUME THE MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITHIN
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
Dear Mr. Church:
Enc 1 osed for your fi 1 es is a fully executed copy of the Intergovernmental
Agreement and Resolution No. R-87-472 regarding the above-mentioned subject.
Palm Beach County will formally accept responsibil ity for the maintenance of
traffic signals in the City of Delray Beach under this Agreement commencing
April 6, 1987, at 7:30 AM.
Please provide me with documentation concerning the credit for signalization
improvement contracts which have been entered into by the City to obta in
credit against the Forty Thousand Dollar ($40,000) annual payment referenced
in Paragraph 7 of the Agreement.
We look forward to providi ng traffic engi neeri ng services to the City of
De 1 ray Beach. It is our intent to work closely with you and your staff so
that we may be responsive to the City's needs, desires and priorities. If you
have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
us.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ~;
~Jl / Ji it ~,.
-,' l \..- ~---. ~
Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E. ~~~
Director - Traffic Division
CRW:kmw ~--~~
Enclosures: Copy of Resolution and Intergovernmental Agreement ~,/~
cc: File - Municipality "Delray Beach"
.. An Equal Opportunity . Affirmative Action Employer
BOX 2429 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402-1989 (305) 684-4000
,.
II
RESOLUTION NO. R-87-472
.
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA APPROVING INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEliENT BETWEEN PALM BEACH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT
ADOPTED March 24, 1987
"
WHEREAS, Palm Beach County, a pol itical subdivision of the State of
Florida is authorized by Section 125-01 ( 1) (p) of the Florida Statutes to
enter into agreements with other governmental agencies for the performance of
governmental functions by one unit in behalf of the other; and
WHEREAS, the Municipal ity of the City of Del ray Beach has requested the
County assume certain traffic engineering functions and responsibil ities
within the municip~l limits and has executed the necessary agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY Cor'1M I SS lONERS OF
PALM BEACH rOUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1: This Board binds and adopts the foregoing recitals.
Section 2: The Intergovernmental Agreement whereby Pa 1 m Beach Coun ty
assumes certain traffic engineering functions and responsibilities, a copy of
which is attached hereto and made a part hereof and incorporated by reference
herein, is approved, and the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and
the Clerk of the Board are authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of
Palm Beach County.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner Wilken . who
moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Marcus .
and upon be i Ilg put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Carol A. Roberts - AYE
Carol J. Elmquist - AYE
Karen T. MarclIs - AYE
Dorothy Wilken - AYE
Ken:1eth M. Adams - AYE
The Chairman thereupon declared the Reso 1 ut i on dul y pas sed and adofJ t ed
this 24th day of M~Tt""h , 19 aL.
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
~? B. DUNKLE, Clerk
By: \j C'~CL. '-IYl t'j7ddClt~/J
By: ~ -
(/County .At-tor ey Deputy Clerk J
'.
.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PALM
BEACH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA WHEREBY PALM BEACH COUNTY
WILL PROVIDE CERTAIN TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
SERVICES TO THE CITY.
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this __________
day ofM~~_~_~~~8J_, A.D., 19__, by and between:
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PALM BEAC H
COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of
Florida, hereinafter referred to as the WCountyW; and
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, a municipal
corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida,
hereinafter referred to as the WCity".
WIT N E SSE T 8:
WHEREAS, Section 316.006(2), Florida Statutes, grants
municipalities original jurisdiction over all streets am'
highways located within their boundaries, except State roads,
and grants said municipalities authority to place and maintain
traffic control devices which conform to the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Hiahwavs and specifi-
cations of the State Department of Transportation upon all
streets and highways under their original jurisdiction, as they
shall deem necessary, to indicate and to carry out the prov i-
sions of Chapter 316 or to regulate, warn, or guide traffic:
and
WHEREAS, the County presently has traffic engineering
expertise and technical capability as authorized by Section
316.006(3), Florida Statutes; and
t~2~"
'.
2
.
WHEREAS, the County has determined that centralizing
the installation, operation, and maintenance of traffic control
devices on the major roadways throughout Palm Beach County,
Florida, in one responsible governmental entity is the most
economical and efficient means of providing such needed
services: and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of the centralization of
mutual traffic functions, the City has agreed to transfer and
the County has agreed to accept certain authority, powers,
responsibilities and duties as enumerated herein formerly
exercised by the City pertaining to the planning, installation,
operation and maintenance of traffic control devices on certain
roadways and s ignali zed intersections in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the Agreement: and
WHEREAS, the City will provide the financial assis-
tance for a transition period as described below: and
WHEREAS, Palm Beach County will add one Engineering
Assistant I pos it ion to its staff to assist Palm Beach County
in accommodating the additional engineering duties conferred on
Palm Beach County by this agreement: and
WHEREAS, as a part of the consideration for the
entering into of this Agreement, the County has agreed to
assume the current :funding obligation for the continued
operation of the traffic design and signalization responsi-
bilities transferred hereunder, pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement: and
WHEREAS, Section l25.0l(p) , Florida Statutes,
authorizes the County to enter into agreements with other
governmental agencies within or outside Ithe boundaries of the
.,
3
.
County for the performance by the County of certain of the
City's authorized functions.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and
mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties do agree as
follows:
l. TRANSFER OF FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES
The City agrees to transfer to County, and the County
agrees to accept and perform the fOllowing functions and duties
on certain major roadways and signal ized intersections as
listed in Section 2 of this Agreement in order to protect the
welfare of the public, which functions and duties were formerly
performed by, or the responsibility of the City.
(a) Install stop or yield signs necessary to govern
traffic.
(b) Maintain, operate and upgrade as necessary
existing traffic signals.
(c) Install, maintain and operate new traffic
signals where warranted (City Counc il approval
will be required prior to the installation of a
traffic signal at the intersection of two City
streets), and City Counc il approval will be
required prior to the removal of any traffic
signal covered by this Agreement.
(d) Prohibit or restrict traffic movements including
left, right and U-turns.
(e) Install and maintain traffic markings including
crosswalks, safety zones and traffic lane
striping.
(f) Designate one-way streets.
"
4
.
(g) Establish no-parking, no-standing, and
no-stopping regulations; provided, however, the
City shall retain the right to designate
on-street parking areas within the City's limits
and the County shall have no jurisdiction or
control thereof except for the purposes of
safety only, in which event the County shall
have the power to modify, reduce or eliminate
any on-street parking on the roadways affected
by this Agreement7 and provided further that the
City's authority shall extend to, but shall not
be 11mi ted to, the installation and removal of
parking meters, the rates charged therefore, and
the regulation of parking times.
(h) Establish emergency and experimental
regulations.
( i ) Establish on-street truck and passenger loading
zones.
(j) Establish speed limits.
(k) Establish no passing zones.
(1) Establish traffic control guidelines for all
. roadway construction and maintenance operations.
(m) Prohibit use of streets by trucKs.
(n) Establish bridge loading restrictions.
The County shall perform the above described functions and
duties provided, however, the County may assign to its Division
of Traff ic Engineering or any successor division which may be
created, such ministerial tasks as it deems appropriate. The
County shall be fully responsible for all items delineated in
paragraphs (a) through (n) above, and the City shall have no
..
5
.
duties or obligations whatsoever with regard to iten,
delineated in paragraphs ( a) through (n) above provided however
that the City spec ifically reserves the right to regulate
parking within its jurisdiction. The City's authority shall
extend to, but shall not be limi ted to, the installation and
removal of parking meters, the rates charged therefore, the
regulation of parking times, and the regulation of parking
along the various thoroughfares within the City. Any such
regulation shall conform with traffic engineering standards
which prescribe minimum distances from intersections and
traffic ways.
All signs, signals, and markings and the placement
thereof shall be in conformance with the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Hi9hways published by
the State Department of Transportation.
2. ROADWAYS AND INTERSECTIONS AFFECTED
The transfer of functions and duties desc ribed in
Section 1 above shall apply to all signalized intersections and
the following roadways:
BQMl LIMITS
(a) Linton Boulevard Within City Limits
(b) Congress Avenue Within City Limits
(c) Swinton Avenue Within City Limits
(d) Old Germantown Road Congress Ave. to West City Limits
(e) Old Germantown Road S.W. 10th Street to Linton Blvd.
(f) Lake Ida Rd/N.E. 4th Ave. West City Limits to U.S. U
(g) Barwick Road Within City Limits
(h) Old Dixie Highway Within City Limits
(i) N.E. 8th Street From U.S. .1 to A-I-A
(j) N.E. 2nd Avenue N.E. 8th St. to N. City Limits
6
.
( k) N.E. 22nd Street Swinton Ave. to N.E. 2nd Ave.
(1) Military Trail Within City Limits
At such time that any roadway within the City which
is currently the jurisdiction of the State of Flor ida or the
City is turned over to the County for maintenance and the
County receives written notification thereof from the City,
then that roadway shall be considered included in this
Agreement.
The existing signalized intersections affected
follow:
(a) N.E. 22nd St. , Seacrest Blvd.
(b) N.E. 14th St. & U.S. tl
(c) N.E. 8th St. , N.E. 2nd Avenue
(d) N.E. 8th St. & N.E. 5th Avenue
(e) N.E. 8th St. , N.E. 6th Avenue
(f) N.E. 8th St. & SR-AIA (N. Ocean)
( f) N.W. 4th St. , Swinton Avenue
(h) N.E. 4th St. & 2nd Avenue
(i) N.E. 4th St. & N.E. 5th Avenue
( j ) N.E. 4th St. & N.E. 6th Avenue
(k) N.E. 3rd St. & N.E. 2nd Avenue
(1) N.W. 2nd St. & N.W. 5th Avenue
(m) N.W. 2nd St. , Swinton Avenue
(n) N.E. 2nd St. & N.E. 2nd Avenue
(0 ) N.E. 2nd St. & N.E. 5th Avenue
(p) N.E. 2nd St. & N.E. 6th Avenue
(q) N.E. 1st St. & N.E. 2nd Avenue
(r) West Atlantic Avenue & Barwick Road
(s) West Atlantic Ave. & High Point/Homewood Blvd.
( t) West Atlantic Ave. & Congress Avenue
'.
7
..'
.
(u) West Atlantic Avenue & 1-95
(v) West Atlantic Avenue & 10th Avenue West
(w) West Atlantic Avenue & 8th Avenue West
(x) West Atlantic Avenue & 5th Avenue West
(y) Atlantic Avenue & Swinton Avenue
(z) East Atlantic Avenue & 1st Avenue East
(aa) East Atlantic Avenue & 2nd Avenue East
(bb) East Atlantic Avenue & 3rd Avenue East
(cc) East Atlantic Avenue & 4th Avenue East
(dd) East Atlantic Avenue & 5th Avenue East
(ee) East Atlantic Avenue & 6th Avenue East
(ff) East Atlantic Avenue & 7th Avenue East
(gg) East Atlantic Avenue & Venetian Drive
(hh) East Atlantic Avenue & Gleason St.
(ii) East Atlantic Avenue & SR-A1A ( N. Oc e an )
(j j) S.E. 2nd Street & Swinton Avenue
(kk) S.E. 2nd Street & S.E. 5th Avenue
( 11) S.E. 2nd Street' S.E 6th Avenue
(mm) Casuarina Rd. , SR-AlA (5. Ocean)
(nn) Lowson Blvd. & Congress Avenue
(00) S.E. 10th St. , Swinton Avenue
(pp) S.E. 10th St. , S.E. 5th Avenue
(qq) Delray Mall & U.S. .1 and Banyan Tree Lane
(r r) Linton Blvd. , Homewood Blvd.
(ss) Linton Blvd. & Congress Avenue
(tt) Linton Blvd , 1-95
(uu) Linton Blvd. , S.W. 10th Avenue
(vv) Linton Blvd. , Old Dixie Hwy.
(ww) Linton Blvd. & U.S. n
(xx) Linton Blvd. & SR-AlA
8
(yy) . Lindell Blvd. , Old Dixie Hwy.
(zz) Lindell Blvd./Ave. L & U.S. 'I
(aaa) West Atlantic Avenue & N.W. 1st Avenue (Fire Signal)
(bbb) Linton Blvd. (Fire Signal Station 13)
(ccc) N.E. 8th St. & N. Swinton Avenue (Flasher)
(ddd) N.W. 2nd St. & N.W. 8th Avenue (Flasher)
(eee) Lake Ida & Barwick Rd.
(fff) Lake Ida & Congress Avenue
(ggg) Lake Ida & Military Trail
(hhh) Linton Blvd. , Military Trail
(iii) West Atlantic & Barnett Bank
(j j j) West Atlantic & Military Trail
(kkk) Linton Blvd. & S.W. 4th Avenue
(111 ) West Atlantic Avenue & 12th Avenue West
(mmm) Congress Avenue & Germantown Rd.
(nnn) N.E. 1st Street & N.t. 5th Avenue
(000) S.E. 1st Street & S.E. 5th Avenue
(ppp) S.t. 1st Street' S.E. 6th Avenue
(qqq) N.E. 1st Street & Swinton Avenue
( rrr) S.E. 1st Street & Swinton Avenue
(sss) Fire Station 14--Lake Ida Road and Barwick Road
(Flasher)
(ttt) West Atlantic Ave. and Hamlet Dr. (Signal Authorized)
3. RETENTION BY THE CITY OF FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES NOT
TRANSFERRED
It is specifically understood and agreed that all rights
and powers as may be vested in the City pursuant to Chapter 316
of the Florida Statutes or any other Law or ordinance or
Charter provisions of the City and not specifically transferred
to County hereunder shall be fully retained by the City. It is
,.
9
further understood and agreed that the City is not transferrin
any of its traffic enforcement functions, rights and duties
together with all rights of enforcement of City traffic
ordinances or State traffic statutes.
4. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
The City transfers ownership to the County of all traffic
control devices presently installed within and owned by the
City within the roadways involved in this Agreement. The
existing traffic signals involved are those listed in Section 2
of this Agreeme~t.
5. PAYMENT OF UTILITIES FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
County agrees to be responsible for and to pay utility
bills for traffic control devices enumerated in Section 2 of
this Agreement.
6. COUNTY TO PROVIDE NECESSARY FINANCIAL SUPPORT UNDER
AGREEMENT
The County agrees to provide in its annual budget thE
financial support necessary for the purposes set forth in this
Agreement.
7. FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF CITY
To provide for a transition period to assist palm Beach
County in capi tal improvements for traffic signals which will
be required in the City of Delray Beach, the City agrees to
provide to Palm Beach County $40,000.00 annually, beginning
January 1, 1987, for the five (5 ) successive calendar years.
Palm Beach County agrees to spend a minimum of $200,000.00 to
upgrade the traffic signals within the City of Delray Beach
within this time frame. After these payments are made no
further remuneration will be required of the City. The County
shall give credit to the City for the current City contracts or
upgraded signalization entered into prior to January 1, 1987.
.
10
.
a. ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL
Palm Beach County agrees to provide suff ic ient staff in
its Traffic Division to accommodate the additional Engineering
duties conferred on Palm Beach County by this Agreement.
9. APPLICATION FOR STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS BY THE COUNTY
The City agrees to allow the County to apply for and
accept any State or Federal Grants, loans, or other programs,
which may become available to the County by virtue of the
transfer of this function from the City to the County.
10. CITY ORDINANCES TO CONFORM TO AGREEMENT
The City agrees to make whatever changes to its code of
ordinances that are necessary to fully implement the provisions
of this Agreement.
11. REOUESTS OF THE CITY
Subject to budgetary and financial considerations, the
County and the Traffic Engineering Division of the County agree
to implement all reasonable written requests as warranted by
traffic engineering studies of the City for the installation,
retention, or removal of traffic control devices within the
City and further agree to implement all reasonable requests of
the City with regard to any of the duties and functions
specified in paragraph 1 above, so long as such requests accord
with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets
and Hiqhwavs and specifications of the State Department of
Transportation and commonly accepted standards of traffic
engineering.
12. COORDINATION OF CITY AND COUNTY IN REVIEWING FUTURE
DEVELOPMENTS
The City agrees to coordinate with the County through the
City's Engineering and Planning Departments the review of all
"
11
.
developments which will generate any traffic impact of conse-
quence on major roadways.
13. CANCELLATION
This Agreement may be cancelled by the City or County upon
ninety (90) days formal written notice. In the event of any
cancellation the parties agree that the traffic signals shall
remain at their respective locations subject to the following:
(a) Signals owned prior to this Agreement by the City
shall become City property and subject to City
ownership and control thereafter.
(b) Signals originally owned or constructed by the
County may be purchased by the City upon notice to
that effect from City to County within sixty (60)
days from date of cancellation. If the City desires
to retain these signals it shall pay the County for
the County's original cost thereof, including instal-
lation charges, minus a deprec!at ion factor of
one-tenth (1/10) of the original cost per year to be
deducted from such cost. In no event however shall
the payment be less than thirty percent (30t) of the
original cost of installation.
14. APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY
Both parties hereby agree that each party shall be respon-
sible for damages caused by its own negligence, and further
that municipality in County further mutually covenant agree
that in the event liability for property damages or personal
injury to third persons is imposed upon either of said parties
purely on a technical or a derivative basis as a result of the
negligence of the other party, the party hereto whose negli-
gence occasioned the imposition of such derivative or technical
liability upon the other parties shall, to the extent permitted
by law, indemnify said other party but only to the extent of
the specific monetary 11mi tations of liability reflected in
Section 768.28(5) Florida Statute.
'.
. -
12
.
15. COUNTERPARTS OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in two
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original,
and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same
instrument.
BOARD OF THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA FLORIDA
BY~~ By,--Q-Ud7~ ::,
~n~
~::= Mayor
------------------------
"u rne :.', d
.'~~~'~~t. JOHN 8. DUNKLE, CLERK "
,
Attest:
. ' . Boar of County Commissioners -' ~ . :~ ~
,
~ 2f(~~-{f~-~
/
'~pproved,.~s to Form: App oved as ~o Form: "
. " ~~,-~A~
-----------------------
...I' City Attorney .
'.
~
'.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: (.I"'j
CITY MANAGER:-/
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # Cfr - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
APPOINTMENTS TO THE NEIGHBORHOODS TASK TEAM
DATE: April 10, 1992
This item is before you to appoint three members to the Neighborhoods
Task Team. These appointments will replace members who have not
attended meetings since the Team 's expansion in January 1992. Staff
recommends the appointment of one alternate member, Ann Fulton, to
regular status. We have also received applications from:
-Victor and Lillian Flores
-Zarus Wright
A detailed staff report is attached as backup material for this item.
Recommend appointment of three members to the Neighborhoods Task
Team.
Ann Fu..l-ton
Lill iAn F=loe~ ~ ~
2A-i?J..A,5 lJJ12iqhf
~ JnCK/11
JOhn F~/:S ~
'.
. .
'.
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVID HARDEN - CITY MANAGER r
FROM: LULA BUTLER - DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT~
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THREE APPOINTMENTS TO THE
NEIGHBORHOOD TASK TEAM
--
DATE: APRIL 9, 1992
ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION:
- -
Commission consideration is requested for replacing three (3 )
current members of the Neighborhood Task Team.
BACKGROUND:
The Neighborhood Task Team has held five meetings since the
team's expansion in January. The following members have not
attended any of the five meetings: Deanna Hartman, Dick
Sheremeta and Steve Wexel.
We would like to replace the above-named members by appointing
one of the three original alternates as a regular member plus two
of the three new persons who have applied for membership.
The attached list represents the current alternate members and
persons who have expressed an interest in being appointed. Mr.
Heller has resigned as an alternate and Mr. Weinberger has not
been able to attend any of the meetings.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Commission appoint Ann Fulton, Lillian
Flores and Zarus Wright as regular members of the Neighborhood
Task Team, replacing three of the current members.
LB:DQ
Attachment
D13
NTTApr.Mbr
'.
)
NTT Appointments
April 9, 1992
Page 2 .
CURRENT ALTERNATE MEMBERS:
Ms. Ann Fulton
Mr. Robert Heller, Pines of Delray West (has resigned)
Mr. Saul Weinberger, Del-Aire Golf Club (no attendance)
PERSONS INTERESTED IN BEING APPOINTED:
Victor and Lillian Flores, 605 SE 2nd Avenue, Delray Beach
Zarus Wright, southwest area of Delray Beach
D13
NTTApr. Mbr (2)
"
MEMORANDUM r~~
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER."'~J
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # q ::r - MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1992
APPOINTMENT TO THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES REL}\.TIONS
COMMISSION
DATE: APRIL 9, 1992
The term of Martin Frost on the Public Employees Relations
Commission (PERC) expired on March 13, 1992. Mr. Frost was
originally appointed to serve a four-year term in January of
1988. The term is for four (4) years. He is eligible for and is
interested in being considered for reappointment. Mr. Frost was
appointed as PERC Chairman by the City Commission on April 11,
1990. Mr. Frost has attended all meetings since his appointment.
His application is attached. The term would end on March 13,
1996.
According to state statute, the appointee will be a person who,
on account of previous vocation, employment or affiliation, is,
or has been, classified as a representative of employees or
employee organizations. The appointee need not be a resident of
the City of Delray Beach.
The following individuals have submitted their applications and
resumes for consideration:
Robert P. Ferrell
Murray P. Kalish
Leo Kierstein
Rosalind Murray
Deri Joy Ronis
Milford Ross
Based upon the rotation system, the appointment will be made by
Mayor Lynch.
Pursuant to Commission direction, a chec~ for code violations and
property liens has been conducted. According to City records,
none of the applicants has any outstanding violations.
Recommend appointment of a member to the Public Employees
Relations Commission to a term ending March 13, 1996.
.
"
'.
~~I~'b\qd"
M E M 0 RAN DUM tp
.
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER :~11/./
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~ )(" - MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1992
APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRPERSON FOR THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
RELATIONS COMMISSION
DATE: APRIL 9, 1992
Chapter 35.032(A) (1) (b) of the Code of Ordinances provides that
the City Commission shall designate one member of the Public
Employees Relations Commission as Chairperson.
In addition to the individual appointed in the preceding agenda
item, the following persons are currently serving on the Public
Employees Relations Commission as regular members:
Jack Crespin (term expires on 6/24/94)
Leonard Syrop (term expires on 1/29/94)
Anyone of these individuals may be appointed Chairperson, to
serve in that capacity for the duration of the term.
Recommend selection and appointment of a Chairperson for the
Public Employees Relations Commission, at the discretion of the
City Commission.
'.
'.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
I
FROM: CITY MANAGER '/;./
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #. /~ It - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
ORDINANCE NO. 12-92
DATE: April 10, 1992
This is the second reading of an ordinance correcting the zoning
classification from RM (Medium Density Residential) district to CF
(Community Facilities) district, for the Acura Dealership located on
the west side of N.E. 7th Avenue between N.E. 6th and 7th Streets;
and correcting the Official Zoning Map.
This property was original zoned RM-10 (Multiple Family Dwelling
District) in part and SC (Specialized Commercial) in part. On
August 26, 1986 the City Commission approved a conditional use
request for the Acura Dealership which provided for the use of the
east half of the site (RM-10) for employee/customer off-street
parking and the west half of the site (SC) for automotive sales and
associated uses. With the adoption of the Land Development
Regulations, the zoning designations were changed from SC to AC
(Automotive Commercial) and RM-10 to RM (Medium Density Residential).
The RM zoning designation does not allow off street parking as a
conditional use.
During analysis of the LOR rezoning action the approved conditional
use for parking was inadvertently overlooked. Had this information
been available a more appropriate zoning designation would have been
affixed to this property. Correction of the zoning to CF is
therefore appropriate.
The Planning and Zoning Board does not review relief from improper
regulation requests. The Special Adjustment Advisory Board has
reviewed this request and has determined that an inadvertent action
may have occurred and that special consideration is warranted.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 12-92 on second and final
reading.
p~ 6-0
..
'.
'.
------- -_:..::--.=-- :.--_-" ---- -- .- ------- ---- -_._-,,--------- ---.----------- ----~-- -
.
ORDINANCE NO. 12-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, CORRECTING THE ZONING
CLASS IFICATION FOR A PARCEL OF LAND AS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM RM (MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO CF (COMMUNITY
FACILITIES) DISTRICT: SAID LAND BEING LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF N.E. 7TH AVENUE, BETWEEN N.E. 6TH
STREET AND N.E. 7TH STREET: AND CORRECTING "ZONING
MAP OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, 1990": PROVIDING A
GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE: PROVIDING A SAVING
CLAUSE: PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the property hereinafter described is shown on
the Zoning District Map of the City of Delray Beach, Florida,
dated October 1, 1990, as being zoned RM (Medium Density
Residential) District: and,
WHEREAS, a review of City records indicates that such
zoning classification was inadvertently applied to said property:
and,
WHEREAS, Section 2.4.7(F)(2) of the Land Development
Regulations makes provision for relief from improper regulations:
and,
WHEREAS, a request has been made with respect to the
subject property and has been reviewed by the Special Adjustment
Advisory Board, and has been determined to be the result of
inadvertent enactment: and,
WHEREAS, it is appropriate that the Zoning District Map
of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, dated October 1, 1990, be
corrected to reflect the proper zoning thereof,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Zoning District Map of " City of
Delray Beach, Florida, dated October 1, 1990, be, and ,c same is
hereby corrected to reflect a zoning classification of CF
(Community Facilities) District for the following described
property:
Lots 44 through 49, inclusive, and the east
one-half (E 112) of the abandoned (via Resolution
No. 64-86) 16 ft. alley lying west of and adjacent
to said Lots 44 through 49, inclusive, THE HOFMAN
ADDITION TO DELRAY, FLA., as the same is recorded
in Plat Book 5 at Page 3 of the Public Records of
Palm Beach County, Florida.
The subject property is located on the west side
of N.E. 7th Avenue, between N.E. 6th Street and
N.E. 7th Street, Delray Beach, Florida.
Section 2. That the Planning Director of said City
shall, upon the effective date of this ordinance, correct the
Zoning Map of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to conform with
the provisions of Section 1 hereof.
Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances
in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed.
.
"
,.
I ACURA
t ... of del ray beach
.
City of Delray Beach March 3, 1992
, Director of Planning & Zoning
100 Northwest 1st Avenue
De1ray Beach, Florida 33444
ATTN: David Kovacs
Dear Mr. Kovacs,
I, Robert A. Leo owner of Acura of Delray Beach, request
that a hearing be set up by the Special Adjustment Advisory
Board to review an inapproriate or inadvertantly changed
zoning designator for the east half of my Acura Dealership
located at 655 Northeast 6th Avenue Delray Beach, Fl. 33483.
It is my understanding that with the adoption of the
L.D.R.'s in October 1990 my property was given a R.M. zoning
designation. At that time my property was being utilized for
parking for my dealership and therefore would have been more
appropriatly zoned C.F.
Please contact me as to when this meeting will be held and
if I may be of any assistance beforehand please do not hesitate
to contact me.
.e
- il."9~~\~~~~
t;J~\~O , 't.1'l1 ~
'tbb\ ~
'~J~\1.~ --
, ~
655 Northeast 6th Avenue, U,S. Highway One · Delray Beach. Florida 33483 . 40712~ . FAX 4071243-3632
..
'"
city Commission Documentation memorandum
Acura Dealership Rezoning Ordinance
RM to CF
Page 2
.
Attached is a letter received from the owner of the Acura
Dealership in which he seeks correction of the situation.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board does not review this type of
request. The Special Adjustment Advisory Board has reviewed the
request and has determined that had the history of the use been
known with the LDR adoption the recommended zoning designation
would have been CF (Community Facilities), therefore special
consideration is warranted.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1- Reject the request and direct that the item be processed
through the formal rezoning process.
2. Approve the request.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approve the ordinance on first reading correcting the
official zoning map from RM to CF (Community Facilities) for
lots 44-49 and 1/2 of the abutting abandoned 16' alley as shown
on the plat of Hofman Addition of Delray.
Attachment:
* Letter from owner
Location map
.,
f'Rt<i .\. I"?,~' i/j' (0 : ,",;' .... " " 'I .-.rr-' .. '. .
I a..e: II . _ . > 'I \4\.'
- .. ~ . 'U' fl 2. I : <l: ! i l~ Z. l.S; , t---
- 5. ' /, ",' H. '~ . , >4" ,
S . I .. 11 '., .. J" e:.
> <. ' ,- - II 1. _ " ~ l; 2/0:' ..
~u - \,l.."1 .....'
. ,.. - .. . ~ ".41 '!) J E . i I~ ;J I( 4-1}
ST ..... - -- PH. 3 ~ . ~s 12. . '~fi'~
. . .. , . . . .... ".'.... ..j I' I II) 'n' ...' ' , ,~~ if: .
~ q... ,...,
~. : ...,.::. ,'WITHE OON LN
_ ~ J~ !S MARTELL I U 1 a.. 1(""' ... ,'''';./ /t<E.N~
~ ~:.. of "\ ARMS ~ ~.:'I 9 J/ ,~,
~ . ~ ,.... CONDO ~~L ,~ A, ." ~st ADD.
. ..J .... a:::! 0 ,. ~ -If /' Ih'
,. . .. .. ST" ~ (8-40) ~U): PH.I I ~~b ' ;: Me LN', ..(22-24)
2- o~ u ",', .
, .. .. . .. .. "" ""\ 's\ 1-11: 0 J C1> ;, ~,
'..~. GC a::c~ I u ;. , ~l.O .
~ ! n,'2. , ~ r;; PH.2 (25'2 . ,.' ~., i M
~ ~ - DEL REV
';'/ ' ,--.. r ~ 'J '..... '''rs .~ '" ~ 9'n' 'niB '4 : 9'n' /8 & 9'''' ,', CONDO
.111'1 l') " Z'ffi- ~ ,::~ .' t. ~ 'II.
. UIJI.. . ,A ....n #} ~ ..' '..I . . It :::i: PALM TR
U . ,w >lI .JJ' , _... ~~ : '_ , : -.J
ST I.u ; /: ,.' $0 : -.1'-" I,j<'. '" : ~: ~ on'~' : 'it. YATCH CLU
" .. .. .. .. .. ...' 'w '.' LA.. I r II (: ) ,C:l 7 f CONDO.
I 'I L:...:' :. (3J' ' . ,\.5) :
4 ' :/ ~ 71';;' ..~"': . , : : '
2' '~ ! :/ I:. m" , 0 : . (4 _, FALMTR
~ 'f~O' I . .~. I ~,.. '. PLACE :
2' . ,.. .. ~ ... . ~ ~ CONDO. \
t , I ' 'I 10'!"'" ~ O' .
11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t f ~. l,e, , ...., 0 ... "-,
. ' . .. ....J..l... 'l II j; 10.' ,H' '>1' ,~,. If" S'. III''' ~ ",', ~ '.
--Sf----' NE 8th ST--
,U'~ ....' ~ fE' os'" f' H' .~' , "~'t fl' ..l",~f;"~fo"I..'~1 I
. . ~A - ~4 ; . ~ ' 'Ml " , G -
,.... " 11.0' .., Q' '
,...... ~.. '~': 64 6i " G N u~ '51- Sf A fIt
,~). ..
~". 0, , "J7 ,,4D - ,
) , l~'"
. " '.
, .;: t .. .,..'~ 41 .. JI' 4$" "
. ~ I ~
" ,...,::, li. N E 7 t I a: !
. ..;.~;' : t ~ e~3 U~;;I. eIU~TI"c;. ~WEDGEWOO~
. T '2JD~ " , 9 ", _2 2- 7. __ .1)!ALe.flS"'P RM;IC '
.~ : ~ ~, Of ".# H' oS ".rL,I..,~1 1"<1) ,,1..1 ...1 ..., I I CO-OP I
~~ , ---NE-- -7th- _<:' __ __ '
~. ~ ~ . , "K' "'. $0' "" [ ,lIII 4D' ," .n' ~ I '....' '..' u.' ,ow.'
io <:r' .: " to:: ~-' 44 , ~'7 ~ \ " .. 4'.. . i \
() .r., ~r. ~ ':I, '" 1'3 l · ..,' 't I ~ ..; '5 = CD ~ I "
" : : "IIIliiIl" , -: REPLA OF '.... ;
" ~. . _ . u... ,...' (23-123) l ~
~. c,...... J" HrH MLlN, Ann. -3~:.' d ,J k MART (S VINEYJlRO ...'..)~ '
.' ... 'Cli ----,- ... ~ 0 14" W ~ . '
. y.... ~.. ~ I ~ _" Z , 1 ': & i ~~. '
:A~ . C' . h 25 '.. - '..... : I .. - , \
~a _,.' '" I,t. ;~, .. oAs_, L' n' 11..1 ,..'~ I '.... ,..' '.... '/....., ,(
n' /i@' ~ . . > It) '" . (,
TERR-~ .13 .: NE 6th ST ~ C(,w,~~~NE--6th--ST"~
~. i 14::) ~ ~ ~ 7;' 1~ ~ (/) !: 31" >fso'~ ~ 6t' ;; ~ 11-. " . ....1. r..'a i ' ~
/S1 ~, ~:..& __e.::: " ..-::..1 _In "1' : I ~l VIL A E ~''')R ~ ~.... " "-
I" '-' ~, ~ ~ ..,' ,IHI": ~r, -2:..., ,! ,...., ~
. J ,.,' ",,.., _ " _,: ~ 6" ! CD :
". _' " : ~ " """'-. . :E ,; s (6 9");' l~ S "", .......
...I \.. ~ "- . " ~ a ':I, ~ ~ - "!
.' ,..' , (/) F w % ~ & 11. . I 7
T << , ::>.. 31..;' 32 5!5 '.. z;. 56 ':):0 14 :l
~ " ,1.. ~ '" ~t$' -;;.' '0 .. ',K' ,,,.;:; '" ;..' .~,' ..... - .. -' "0';1 L (8-40)
S 1~ ~J - , ...L. ' ,
~' ____~_--_- E----_ _5th___ST_ -e-"
J .... j r:--- , -..' _ ;, ,", 'JI', 0 'J<' ...'., I~' '",'. c.'. I ;,.,-' I.:.....' "s".. ..X~ ...' ~, -. I"
, "' I ~ . I " e - " 36 e ~ T? I..., g ~ 0 ---- .. '
""' '- , - , fSJ' > ,
'w'", .:, ' ~ . ' . . , , . ,
- ",' 'x- 'I
0, :- ~, .{Z_Rnl, ': "LAS. ,DAI Ll S ' 'SU8 '10-68
'0- _ ...--' ~, \1
'II" m' ,HAL ER, ~ TMA"S. : , . . . i.
..' /. ~ ..J .
2..;' .~" . C(. , . , , , , :, I
.' ~~ , '----: " ~ lJ ' ffi ~ ~) , : , , . , , ~
"" f . ,_ .0, '
",,' ' - 'W~ .' , , .. .
~ Il~ :lRlNI9VA~' 'Sl. ' 11.., , ' , , . , .; \i /
:~ ~ .?,ADD'~ '~?os' !9., '~ ~'~ ~~.,~ ...': ~;., ~"' j i I~,., ~'...:: i ~t.'h' ...~S ;: \\ i ,
'~ N E 4t h Sf Ii _ _
I
/ / I 344 J
)
. I
"
-
4
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ({//
,/ .
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # /~ ~ - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
ORDINANCE NO. 13-92
DATE: April 10, 1992
This is the second reading of an ordinance rezoning and placing
land, located on the southwest corner of N.W. 2nd Street and N.W. 8th
Avenue, and presently zoned R-1A (Single Family Residential) zone
district in CF (Community Facilities) zone district.
This site (Lots 21,22, 23 and 24, Block B, Westside Heights)
currently contains the American Legion Hall (approximately 3,600
square feet), seven parking spaces and two vacant lots. The existing
use, American Legion meeting hall, does not conform to the R-1A
zoning. This inconsistency further poses a problem with respect to
modification of the site plan. Therefore, Community Facilities
zoning designation is more appropriate for this site.
Additionally, following installation of the Northwest Drainage
District outfall along N.W. 2nd Street, the street will be
reconstructed, and the jog which now exists at the intersection of
N.W. 2nd Street and N. W. 8th Avenue will be re-aligned. In order to
straighten the road, the parking in front of the American Legion
building must be eliminated.
Staff is currently designing a new parking lot for the site. The
proposed lot will be located behind the American Legion building,
with access from N.W. 8th Avenue.
The Planning and Zoning Board at their March 16th meeting recommended
approval of rezoning petition. There was public comment from a
property owner who was concerned about the street alignment, and from
a party interested in the project. A detailed staff report is
attached as backup material for this item.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 13-92 on second and final
reading.
f~5~
.
"
_.
-----~_. -- -._~- - -~
.------- -- -- ---- --- --. ~-. --- -_.~-- ------
-
ORDINANCE NO. 13-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REZONING AND PLACING LAND
PRESENTLY ZONED R-1A (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
DISTRICT IN CF (COMMUNITY FACILITIES) DISTRICT;
SAID LAND BEING LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
N.W. 2ND STREET AND N.W. 8TH AVENUE, AS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND AMENDING
"ZONING DISTRICT MAP, DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA,
1990"; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following described property in
the City of Delray Beach, Florida, is hereby rezoned and placed
in the CF (Community Facilities) District as defined in Chapter
Four of the Land Development Regulations of Delray Beach,
Florida, to-wit:
Lots 21, 22, 23 and 24, Block B, WEST SIDE
HEIGHTS, Delray, Palm Beach County, Fla. ,
according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat
Book 13 at Page 61 of the Public Records of Palm
Beach County, Florida.
The subject property is located at the southwest
corner of N.W. 2nd Street and N.W. 8th Avenue, and
contains a 0.67 acre parcel of land, more or less.
Section 2. That the Planning Director of said City
shall, upon the effective date of this ordinance, change the
Zoning District Map of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to
conform with the provisions of Section 1 hereof.
Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances
in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 4. That should any section or provision of
this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or
word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part
declared to be invalid.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and
final reading on this the day of , 1992.
MAY 0 R
ATTEST:
City Clerk
First Reading:
Second Reading:
.
"
"-
City Commission Documentation memorandum
Rezoning American Legion Hall
Page 1.1
...
The City C~ission initiated the change in zoning from R-IA to
CF on February 11, 1992.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at it's
meeting of March 16, 1992. The Planning and Zoning Board
recommended approval of the request on a 7-0 vote. Two members
of the public spoke, one property owner to the west concerned
about street alignment, and the other just interested in the
project.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approve this ordinance on first reading based upon
the findings made by the Planning and Zoning Board.
Attachments:
* Parking lot sketch plan
* Location Map
.,
I ~ . . Ht.'
~ I LOT 17 2 : LOT 17. I : ~ ' I :....--- ---117:' ~1 "'. ,
· - i-' =o,..J. I-
I (4~""1
__ I __
I
I
LOl
'-
- " .,~
'z'
"
P
I \--
, -
I _ , t II ,
\ ' \ /i'l .
~ ,,, '. /
~ Il"rLT I
1 .... 'I
---- - ,--
'0 ........ ...... 1 "_
~ -______[."r (O~( c' .......(W(.., ,.~ , ... .~.. "___ "
\ I -.... --- -- "
j I LOT 24 I fl /l:;~'"
\ . l~ "
1_\-- - - - - - - '-1 ";"Slllj-'" !
I - , . ct .,
I I I --P"")~l
I I "'~T ,oe. .....-
, "'
- -\ ,. -,
I A\lE'tr'=Ak LE"';I:'I I . '\ "'-.. /i . ,,-
po~r ,n ' , """'" ' / "0 l
---~I-i----------:--:-----~.- ?! ,4:r..,_. I
:"!'I I / I: ---:-r 1 '.' ) ," I
o . , I I
"I I ! 1! '- : // ' ::: I I
, I I LOT 2 ~ -1. ,-_. ... "i 1 t I
, .(_L -- ---.- --- I -- ~. I I
l ' I ,
)2'2 ' ~
I -.. .- · . - i.. I
------------------------- I I
I I ..
~ I I
- I
c:;t \lL'':'"'' ll'~tlh(#
I Lor 22 'A'~ (~, : I I
\ ' i f'(. I I '
.~:! 1 I I
- - - - - - - !..- - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ I I
I -..--- I I
~ II ~lO"" ~., !1". ---- I ~
- -.,- - TO -I; - - - . - --'\~ I
~~r "'I Lor 21 , ,'~.. -- -:,...... / I
I ,,/ I i- ! I I I
J (~ ,~ I' ! I _., f t 1.. I I
1 1 -= t I , : /
. . / ~.,' I I
,,-
-------~.r-----.~.~-------'~ I : :
He"".. ~""" 0/.. ,., ",,&fe" .--/
U'~TI"G ~"'L( "':'l( N. W. 8TH AVE.
. '.~' w . ..
'.'
..~~':~.
,.
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER -1;/
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # /0 C, - MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 92-1
DATE: April 10, 1992
This item is before you to authorize staff to forward Amendment 92-1
to the State Department of Community Affairs. This item was
discussed at the February 25, 1992 regular meeting at which time the
Commission authorized initiation of Amendment 92-1 to the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
Generally, the first amendment of each year focuses upon updating the
work program in the Comprehensive Plan; making adjustments to the
Capital Improvement Program; status of various objectives and
policies; corrections; and general housekeeping. The proposed
amendment will be processed so that final action will occur
concurrent with final consideration of the annual operating budget in
September.
At their March 16th meeting the Planning and Zoning Board held a
public hearing on Plan Amendment 92-1. A few individuals testified
that their properties were presently commercial and should not be
designated residential; and, one property owner testified that his
property had not been purchased and should not be formally included
in the Anchorage project. Other testimony received involved the
desires of a few property owners to construct duplexes or
multi-family residences on substandard lots. Additionally, the Board
recommended that the West Atlantic Avenue water and sewer line
relocation be added to the Schedule of Capital Improvements; and
that a policy which addresses the City's desires to locate a major
tennis stadium within the City be included in the Comprehensive Plan.
A detailed staff report is attached as backup material for this
item. The Commission was provided a copy of Amendment 92-1 at the
April 7th workshop meeting. A copy of which is available in the
Planning and Zoning Department for review.
Recommend authorization to forward Amendment 92-1 to the City's
Comprehensive Plan to the State Department of Community Affairs.
-1+01
1"~1 Ilpf~Occq
6-0
'.
"
. -::. ~
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
.
TO: ~D T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
\ ~~jf(j~
THRU: 'DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
FROM: STAN WEEDON, PLANNER IIJJ
SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1992
AMENDMENT 92-1
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 92-1 to the
State Department of Community Affairs for the required 90
day review.
BACKGROUND/CHRONOLOGY:
The City is allowed to enact two amendments to its Comprehensive
plan each year. In Delray Beach, the first amendment of each
year focuses upon updating the work program; making adjustments
to the Capital Improvement Program; status of various objectives
and policies; corrections; and general housekeeping. The
amendment is processed so that final action will occur
concurrent with final consideration of the annual operating
budget.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 92-1 comprises the first of two
amendments to the Plan which will occur in 1992. The Planning
and zoning Board at their February 10th meeting reviewed items
to be included in Plan Amendment 92-1 and forwarded them to the
City Commission with a recommendation that the Commission
initiate the amendment. The Commission initiated Amendment 92-1
on February 25, 1992.
The Planning and Zoning Board held an advertised public hearing
on March 16, 1992, at which there was considerable testimony
(see Planning and Zoning consideration discussion) . On March
26, 1992, the Board forwarded the proposed amendment on a
unanimous vote after modifications were made.
The formal Amendment 92-1 document was provided to the
Commission at the April 7th Workshop meeting. Attached to this
documentation is a memo which identifies items which were
initiated by the Commission but which no longer appear in the
Amendment. A separate document contains the "data and analysis"
"
,.
City Commission Documentation
Amendment 92-1
Page 2
upon whicJ1 the proposed changes are based. That document is
filed with the City Manager's Office and in the Planning Office.
It will be provided to D.C.A. with the transmittal.
Subsequent to Commission transmittal of the Amendment to the
State, the Department of Community Affairs will review the
Amendment for 90 working days. it is anticipated that the ORC
(Objections, Recommendations, Comments) Report will be received
by the City in mid-July. The Planning Department will advise
the Planning and Zoning Board and City Commission of any
significant responses and prepare the Response to ORC Report.
The Response to ORC Report and final adoption of Amendment 92-1
will be presented to the City Commission for approval in late
August.
ITEMS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
Items of particular significance are listed below. References
to where the item is located in the Amendment document are
provided by item and page numbers.
1. Changes to the text, policies and Future Land Use Map
(Future Land Use Amendment Item #3) as a result of the
proposed "Anchorage" development project.
a. Identification as a location for an additional
City boatramp (Item V-I, p. 10). Replaced by
FIND, MSA 650.
b. Intracoastal Waterway access, preserving a
natural areas, and providing public park areas
(Item V-2, p. 11 and Item IV-4, p. 44) . Replaced
by FIND, MSA 650.
c. Preservation of 25% of native plant communities
on site (Item 1-11, p. 27) . To be accommodated
throuqh LOR requirements.
d. Priority list for funding of major capital
improvements which pertain to recreational
facilities (Item IV-2, p. 43) . Replaced by FIND,
MSA 650.
e. Identification as "conservation" area (Item IV-3,
p. 43). Deleted.
f. PUblic/private development efforts to provide
enhanced tax base, waterfront access and
amenities, promotion of marine character of
community, CRA/City financing of park component,
identified as mixed use on the Land Use Map (Item
VI-7, p. 50) . Deleted.
g. City development of specific programs for
projects ( Item VI-a, p.5l) . Replaced by FIND,
MSA 650.
h. Priorities for public financial support in
planning, promotion, or development of future
land use activities within the coastal zone
(Item VI-II, p. 52). Replaced by FIND MSA 650.
,.
city Commission Documentation
Amendment 92-1
Page 3
2. Modifications to the future land use
designation/zoning matrix, Land Use Element p.
III-G-42 (Item VII-3, pp. 16-18).
3. The annual report to the Local Planning Agency is
expanded to include bicycle and pedestrian accident
locations, and recommendations of mitigation methods.
(Item XII-2, p. 23)
4. GAE level of service for streets addressed in the GAE
(Item 111-7, p. 39)
5. Reestablishment of the Automobile dealers locational
policy, etc. (Item VII-I, p. 55) .
6 . Addition of a policy to the Future Land Use Element
addressing a Tennis Stadium (Item VII-5, p. 57) .
7 . Addition of the relocation of water and sewer lines on
West Atlantic Avenue in FY 92/93 concurrent with the
widening of Atlantic Avenue by the County (To be added
as a specifically identified component of Item XI-2,
p. 21, and as a text amendment to the Public
Facilities Element as a new need which addresses
required water and sewer upgrades required in
conjunction with the construction of a project
undertaken by another unit of government. This will
be added to the Amendment prior to transmittal).
An item which the Commission inquired about at the April 7th
meeting is the residential density increase for the Central
Business District. This item is a specific component of future
Amendment 92-2.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board considered Comprehensive Plan
Amendment 92-1 at a public hearing on March 16, 1992 at which
time public testimony was received and action deferred to the
Board's March 26th meeting.
Several property owners in the area affected by Future Land Use
Amendment #3 testified before the Board. A few individuals
testified that their properties were presently commercial and
should not be designated residential, and one owner testified
that his property had not been purchased by Mr. Swain, but was
shown as being included in the "Anchorage". These items are
accommodated in the recommended amendment. Another property
owner testified that he desired a commercial designation for
land that is currently zoned and designated residential. Staff
"
City Commission Documentation
Amendment 92-1
Page 4
.
has met with this individual and the item appears to be
resolved. Other testimony about land in this area involved the
desires of a few owners to be allowed to construct duplexes or
multi-family residences. The Board has advised these owners
that the LDR's no longer permit duplexes on substandard lots and
that they must have a minimum of 8,000 square feet for a duplex.
Some of the above mentioned individuals may appear before the
Commission on April 14th.
Another group of citizens spoke in opposition to Land Use Map
change #6 which was "corrective" in nature. Change #6 increases
the designation in the vicinity of Venetian Drive, Casuarina
Road and Langer Way to medium density residential to reflect
current developed conditions.
At the March 26 Planning and Zoning Board meeting, the Board
recommended that the City Commission approve Amendment 92-1 as
modified to reflect the aforementioned land use items for
transmittal to the State for the required review, with two
additional items. These items were; the addition of the West
Atlantic Avenue water and sewer line relocation to the Capital
Improvement Program, and the addition of a policy which
addresses the City's desires to locate a major tennis stadium in
the City (see item VII-5 page 57). These items are accommodated
herein.
One letter has been received relative to the transmittal
hearing. It is from the Town of Gulfstream and is supportive of
the proposed changes to the 17-acre parcel and adjacent
properties (copy attached).
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, transmit Comprehensive Plan Amendment 92-1 to the
State Department of Community Affairs for the required review.
Attachments:
* Memorandum dated March 26, 1992, Status of Items
Removed from Amendment 92-1 as Initiated Via Amendment
Document Dated February 6, 1992
* Notice
* Letter of March 30, 1992 from the Town of Gulfstream
DJK/SW\A:92-1CC.doc
"
"
NEWS I
I
CORRECTED NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING - CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH
. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #92-1
The City Commission of the City of Delray beach, Florida, will be considering Comprehensive Plan
Amendment #92.1 which consists of amendments to the goals. objectives and policies of individual
elements based upon an assessment of tasks accomplished. availability of resources, and new
information. It also includes changes to the Future Land Use Map.
The subject matter of TEXT AMENDMENTS address:
stormwater utility fee · wellfield protection · the "17 acre parcel" · modification to the 5-year CIP
· location of fire station '5 · bicycle and pedestrian circulation · intracoastal waterway "no wake"
zone · Policies related to a tennis stadium and other items of a technical and date nature.
A complete list of the subject matter may ~ obtained from Jhe Planning Df:partment's Office.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. rLORIOA
L->> CIIIIL
\14 .. _
I
. I
"-
.
I I
I
-'
N
-
..... -
AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP INVOLVE THE FOLLOWING:
MAP GENERAL PARCEL SIZE
LEGEND LOCATION' ACTION IN ACRES
1 Gu" Stream Boulevard From: Transitional
To: Commerce 3.15
2 Royal Palm Boulevard From: Transitional
To: General Commercial 0,32
3 N. Lal<e Ave.JFedJlntracoastal Area From: Mixed Use (Open SpacelMedium Density
ResldentlaVTransltlonal
To: low Density Residential 31.36
4 East of N.E. 7th Avenue! . From: Low Density Residential
4th . 7th Street To: Medium Density Residential 3,81
5 S.E. 5th AvenueJ S.E. 2nd From: General Commercial
Street To: Commercial Core 25.65
6 Venltian/ Bayn.&nger From: Low Density Residential
1 A-l-AJ Brooka Lane To: Medium Density Residential 8,64
From: Low Density Residential
To: Medium Density Residential 0.63
8 Linton/A.l.A From: low Density Residential
Spanish TraiV Jasmine Drive To: Medium Density Residential 1,74
9 From: Low Density Residential
DELETED To: Medium Density Residential , ,03
"
11 Pelican HarbOr From: General C<lmmercial
To: Medium Density Residential 0.68
12 Tropic Boulevard! From: Low Density Residential
Spanish Trail To: Medium Densi1y Residential 0.69
13 Undelll Dbde From: Low Density Residential
To: Medium Density Residential 0.35
1. Untonl,P1xIe From: Industrial. in partJ General CommerlcaJ. in part
To: General Commercial 0.75
15 South Side of Southrldge Road From: Low Density Residential
North Side of Southrldge Road To: Redeve~pmentNea'3. 0,63
16 From: low Density Residential
To: Transitional 0.65
17 'Southrldge Village C<lndomlnlum From: low Density Resldentiat. in part! Medium Density
Residential. in part
To: Medium Density Residential 4,n
18A Fire Station '5 - Initial From: Mixed Use (Community Facilities. Open Space)
To: Transitional and Medium Density Residential 9.9
188 Fire Station '5 - Future From: low Density Residential and Medium Density
Residential
To: Community Facilities. Public Buildings and
Community Facilitie8 1.81
19 School In the (Blood's Grove) Relocation Of Symbol For Proposed Facility .
School No
Acreage
20A Georgia Streett Gwen ZelI Avenue From: General Commercial
To: Industrial . 3.7
21 South Congressl S.W. 10th Street From: General Commercial
To: Commerce 2.18
22 Lawson! Homewood Boulevards From: Recreation and Open Space
To: Medium Density Residential 5.30
23 S.W. 10th Streett From: low Density Residential
S.W. 12th Avenue To: Medium Density Residential 1.80
24 S.W. 17th Avenue! S.W. 10th From: Recreation and Open Space I
Street (Case Property) To: Industrial 1.62
25 S.W. 17th Avenue! S.W. 10th From: Recreation and Open Space
Street (770 17th Condo) To: Industrial .80
26 S.W. 17th Avenue! S.W. 10th From: Recreation anti Open Space
Street (Martini Property) To: Industrial 0.6
27 S.W. 20th Court North of From: low Density Residential
10th Street To: Medium Density Residential 1.03 I
28 S.W. 17th Avenuei6th Street From: Open Space
(Surles Property) To: low Density Residential 1.78
29 S.W. 2nd StJS.W. 15th Ave. From: Recreation and Open Space
To: Low Density Residential 0.12
30 S.E. Comer Atlanticl Congress From: Commerce
To: General Commercial 0.66
31 N.W. Comer Atlantlcl Congress From: General Commercial. In partJ Commerce. in part
To: Commerce 8.40
The City Commission will conduct a Public Heari~ on Tuesday, April 14th 1992, at 6:00 P.M., in
the City Commission Chambers at City Hall, 100 .W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. At this
meeting, the Ci~ Commission will consider public testimony and will consider the transmittal of
Comprehensive Ian Amendment #92-1 to the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs,
for inter~vernmental review and comment. Upon completition of that review, an additional adver- I
tised pu lie hearing will be scheduled at which time the City Commission will consider adoption of
Comprehensive Plan Amendment #92-1. I
All interested citizens are invited to attend the public hearing and comment u~n the Plan I
Amendment or submit their comments in writing to the Planning Department. pies of the
proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are available at the Del ray Beach Planning
and Zoning Department, CilJ. Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue (Phone: 243-7040), between the I
hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 .M. on weekdays (excluding holidays).
PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT IF A PERSON~S) DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COM. I
"MISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTE CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING OR HEARING. SUCH PERSON+~ ~
Will NEED A RECORD OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. AND FOR THIS PURPOSE SUCH PERSO~SLMAY NEED
ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE. WHICH RECORD IN l DES THE TES-
TIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED. THE CITY DOES NOT PROVIDE OR PREPARE
SUCH RECORD.
I
CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH 4
ALISON MACGREGOR HARTY
CITY CLERK
PUBLISH: April 8, 1992 -
THE NEWS '-..
BOCAlDELRA Y/BOYNTON/DEERFIELD
Ad #373319
"
11> ()Af)Ii;) ~"e.s
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
, ... 1:"
. ,.J~ rt~1 ':~iJ
.i ~\ = -# - .. Telephone
~~~~
COMMISSIONERS ,~ \\{~ 2 1992 (407) 276-51 16
"'~p":1-, ;..J.~) ti Fax
WILLIAM F, KOCH, JR, Mayor (~~:"~~~~\ (407) 737.{) 1 88
~ '~-- ~ . '-, ;- _~.. , -', -... -.. . 1""\ 1'- I
ALAN I. ARMOUR, Vice Mayor ,." ~ ! =-::". . "1 _:~Tl' '_ ~,,' ,I' ::),':>:,1,'- Town Manager
\',0"--. .. - -" ......
JAMES E, CROSS '~<~~/ E. SCOTT HARRINGTON
KATHLEEN S, WALLACE Town Clerk
LAWRENCE E, STAHL RITA L. TAYLOR
March 30, 1992
The Honorable Thomas Lynch and City Commissioners
City of Delray Beach
100 N.W. 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Dear Mayor Lynch and Commissioners:
Thank you for informing the Town of Gulf Stream of your proposed land use
change along the north end of Palm Trail (File 92-062-3). The Gulf Stream Town
Commission reviewed the proposal at its regular meeting on March 13, 1992 and
unanimously endorsed the change to Low Density Residential.
As you are aware, the Town of Gulf Stream lies immediately across the Intracoastal
Waterway from the subject area. Land uses within the Town in this area consist entirely
of single family homes. Accordingly, the proposed land use change to Low Density
Residential on your side of the waterway is highly consistent and compatible with those
uses on our side.
It is not known at this time whether a representative of the Town will be in
attendance at your meeting on April 14. Therefore, we would like this letter to be made
a part of the record and our support of the proposed change to be noted.
Thank you for your consideration, and hopefully, your support of this important
proposal.
VI .... ~\
-
~r~S~ \
/ '. 1.
r "'..', .
Gulf Stream Town Commission '", t....;......, \.
cc: ~ ,- \
~ ..?,.'
\ : '(;'1 '.
~~ 'G \
\' ' ,.,,\ I
".... .-:- . -,.... -. \' . .
- '
i" ' " \' -
'. "<... '.
\ ..,
100 SEA ROAD. GULF STREAM. FLORIDA 334~3 '
..
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: STAN WEEDON, PLANNER II~
DATE: MARCH 26, 1992
RE: STATUS/JUSTIFICATION OF ITEMS REMOVED FROM AMENDMENT 92-1
AS INITIATED VIA AMENDMENT DOCUMENT DATED FEBRUARY 6, 1992
The purpose of this memorandum is to identify those items which were
removed from Amendment 92-1 subsequent to formal initiation of the
Amendment by the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Commission.
Following each item is a justification statement regarding its
removal from the Amendment and/or present status.
Please note that the item numbers have been changed from those which
initially appeared in the February 6 document utilized for formal
initiation of the Amendment.
( AMENDMENTS TO THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PART II. SUMMARY OF MAJOR FEATURES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
1. Location: P. 11-6 thru 10
Change: AMENDMENT
Comment: Verify capital improvement/project costs amounts
against those at III-B-11, III-B-13, III-B-14, III-H-2,
III-H-3, IV-2, IV-2, IV-5 thru 10 and IV-12 thru 16.
Internal consistency issue.
Justification: The tables in IV-12 through IV-16 represent the
5-Year Capital Improvements Schedule, which is modified yearly
to reflect refinements in project cost estimates, scope and
timing as well as completion of projects. The other tables
cited reflect needs at the time of Plan adoption and are,
therefore, historic in nature. Because of this difference in
purposes, internal consistency will not be possible until the
EAR is complete.
1
AMENDMENTS TO .' THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
.
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
1- Location: P. III-A-9, Section 4. Needs and Recommendations,
eighth (last) diamond
Change: DELETION
'* Computerization of irrigation systems for
public spaces at a conversion cost of
$50,000 a year for five years.
Comment: Reflect current irrigation system computerization
information, also check the CIP Element schedule and text.
Justification: The policy accurately reflects existing
conditions and allocations as expressed in the Five Year
Capital Improvements Schedule >$100,000 in Part IV of the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. Location: P. III-A-14, Policy A-2.2
Change: RESCHEDULE
Policy A-2.2: The geographic area covered by
wellfield protection regulations shall be
expanded to include the area designated as the
one foot drawdown area. A local ordinance shall
be created and adopted in FY 91/92 which extends
the requirements of the County Ordinance to this
increased area.
Comment: Wellfield Protection Ordinance. Local ordinance
not yet written, unlikely to be completed this year.
Therefore, policy is deferred to FY 92/93.
Justification: This policy will be reviewed as part of a
detailed review of Palm Beach County's Wellfield Protection
Ordinance, which was revised in 1991. This ordinance, adopted
by reference in the City's LOR's may eliminate or modify the
need for a separate local ordinance.
2
.,
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT
L Location: P. III-B-31, Policy C-5.1
Change: AMENDMENT
Policy C-5.1: Diversion of funds from the
enterprise accounts to the City's General Fund
shall be minimal and shall be determined only by
measurable ~ltett indirect costs.
Comment: Determined only by measurable indirect costs.
Justification: A complete analysis of the City's current
funding policies will be included in Amendment 93-1.
TRAFFIC ELEMENT
L Location: P. III-C-21, Policy B-2.1, new dot
Change: AMENDMENT
Policy B-2.1: 111111111
Comment: Intersection congestion correction. Add
statement stating unwarranted four-way stops be removed.
Unwarranted four-way stops create increased driver delay.
Raise safety concerns and expose the City to possible
libalis actions resulting from the use of illegal traffic
control devices.
Justification: After discussions with other City staff, it has
been determined that this item is better handled through Staff
actions than by a Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
3
"
2. Location:..,P. III-C-24, policy C-2.2
Change: AMENDMENT
Policy C-2.2: Power poles, and other
obstructions, shall be removed from travelways
(as opposed to right-of-ways). This project
shall be undertaken in concert with Florida Power
and Light. The program shall be developed by the
Engineering Department in 1990 and funding
provided in FY 90/91, if not sooner.
Comment: Removal of obstructions from travelways. Amend
to include obstructions within the required roadside clear
recovery zone. Roadway design requirements require the
clear recovery zone and pavement to remain free of
dangerous obstructions.
Justification: The proposed policy amendment expands the scope
of the specified program dramatically and would require
significant funding and staff commitment. Therefore, the
proposed amendment should not be added until a cost benefit
analysis and justification are prepared and evaluated.
(
3. Location: P. III-C-25, Policy D-2.2
Change: AMENDMENT AND RESCHEDULE
Policy 0-2.2: Bicycle parking and security
facilities shall be required on all new
development which occur past June 1, 1990.
[LOR's Section 4.6.9(C)(I)(c)).
Comment: Bicycle parking and security. City staff shall
examine the threshold levels at which bicycle parking and
security facilities are required. Lower limits would increase
the availability of such facilities thereby encouraging bicycle
use.
Justification: The proposed amendment; to increase the
provision of bicycle parking facilities, via a reduction in the
threshold which requires bicycle parking facilities; is more
appropriately addressed via an amendment to the Land
Development Regulations (LOR's).
4
'.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
1- Locatien: P. III-F-19, Policy A-2.3
Change: AMENDMENT
Policy A-2.3: The City shall request of the City of
Boynton Beach, the Town of Gulfstream, the Town of
Highland Beach, and Boca Raton that notice be given
of any development which shall impact the
Intracoastal Waterway by diversion of runoff, the
increase in direct runoff, or the introduction of a
water-dependent use or commercial or industrial use
along the Intracoastal Waterway. If it is not
apparent that there will be no adverse impacts upon
the Intracoastal Waterway, the item shall be referred
to the Palm Beach Countywide Planning Council for an
analysis and recommendation pursuant to provisions of
its Charter. (c13)
Comment: Substitute name of successor to Countywide Planning
Council. Agency eliminated.
Justification: The County has not yet defined how the functions
of the former Countywide Planning Council will be handled.
\
2. Location: P. III-F-20, Policy A-4.4
Change: DELETION
Policy A-4.4: The City shall support the concept
of "Countywide" application of regulations which
are targeted toward the protection of existing
resources as was done with the Wellfield
Protection Ordinance and Conservation Lands
Protection Ordinance. When such measures are
enacted, the City shall through its Department of
Development Services provide the clerical and
technical support personnel to provide for the
effective implementation of such ordinances.
(c14)
Comment: Support for Countywide application of resource
protection regulations. Political philosophy is moving
away from Countywide applications.
Justification: County and Municipal entities are negotiating
the form and extent of "countywide" application of regulations.
This policy will be addressed based upon the outcome of those
'. negotiations.
5
'.
. ,
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
1. Location: P. III-G-8, First Diamond
.
Change: REVISE
. Level of service deficiencies (based on County
and Regional standards for all but State
facilities in which case FOOT standards are
used) currently (1989) exist on the following
streets:
* Lake Ida Road, now at L.O.S. "0";
* Military Trail, now at L.O.S. "0",
north of Atlantic Avenue;
* 1-95, now at L~O.S. "F".
The County Five-Year Road Program projects
improvements for the above situations is as
follows:
* Lake Ida Road improvements in FY 92/93
* Military Trail improvements in FY 89/90
* Atlantic Avenue west of Congress in FY
91/92 (Atlantic Avenue is a State
facility)
* Germantown Road in FY 91/92
Comment: Revise deficiencies list and County Five-Year
Road Program list.
Justification: This amendment will be included in Amendment
92-2 along with several other traffic related amendments.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
1. Location: P. III-H-2, III-H-3
Change: AMENDMENT
Comment: Verify capital improvement and project amounts
against those at 11-9, 11-10, III-B-11, III-B-13, III-B-14,
IV-2, IV-2, IV-5 thru 10 and IV-12 thru 16. Internal
consistency issue.
Justification: See page 1, item 11 of this memorandum.
6
"
, . , ,
..,on '(2...'
v _\L
, .J'. "J
\<:,-.vl... . '-- \.i ,'- c'- 1\1-
2 . Location: P. III-H- 111 ~ i ~1.I.\y ~ v -- 1,,-
.-"\ 0- \ ~.y-- \~ ~ V A ~~\
Change: . NEW POLICY c\ ~~ cP ~
\' Y ~ Ce./
Comment: Add a policy which provides "if a C1P project
construction estimate is 50% less or greater than the
amount shown in the 5-Year Schedule, then the 5-Year
Schedule must first be amended and thus a determination of
consistency with the ~omprehensive Plan (as to the project)
must be made at the time rather than at the time of site
plan approval or bid award.
Justification:/After discussion with the City Manager and other
Staff, i~ been determined that the proposed new pollcy
would undu . burden and constrain the budgetary process and
infrastru ure program. Therefore, the item has been removed
from consideration.
3. Location: P. l1I-H-24, Policy A-4.1
Change: AMENDMENT
Policy A-4.1: The City shall continue with
impact fee programs which it has established for
water, sewer and park facilities. [LOR's
( Sections 5.3.1 - 5.3.4]
A
Comment: Add drainage - if appropriate.
Justification: It is inappropriate to add the drainage fee to
this policy as it is not an impact fee, it is a utility fee.
SW/A:DOC92-1
7
'.
. . . ~ t3 ~ of1 s1/;;Y
CITY DF DELAAY BEA[H ~
''''.i' 1\ TTORNEY'S 0 "FleE
:-:'4 I 1" Wri ter' s Direct ~ine
(407) 243-7092
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 10, 1992
To: City Commission
From: Jeffrey S. Kurtz, City Attorney
Subject: Newsrack Ordinance; Our File #
On Thursday, April 2, 1992 I met with attorneys and representa-
tives of the major newspapers doing business in Delray Beach
concerning the newsrack ordinance. The newspaper companies
were uniformly opposed to the ordinance and indicated that if
it was passed and enforced as it is currently drafted, litiga-
tion would ensue. The newspaper representatives suggested that
a committee be formed consisting of City and newspaper staff to
determine and review all current newspaper locations and
produce a report on those locations.
The most logical City staff person to be involved in such an
exercise would be our Traffic Engineer, Greg Luttrell, and it
is my estimation that his involvement in such an exercise would
require a minimum of three to five full work days. The report,
as outlined by the newspapers, would identify particular
problem areas and could serve as a basis for a potential
compromise on certain existing locations. The newspaper
representatives indicated that they would rather lock into
their existing locations in an exchange for promises of non-ex-
pansion rather than dealing with the objective criteria set
forth in the ordinance. The newspapers believe that enactment
of the current ordinance would severely restrict the availabil-
ity of newsrack locations. The Palm Beach Post, for example,
indicated that in its review of the location requirements, only
six of their approximately 70 locations would not violate some
aspect of the ordinance.
Greg Luttrell and I have modified many of those standards which
may reduce slightly the number of current newsrack locations
affected. The revisions were made at Mr. Luttrell's suggestion
and better define the clear zone and site areas. The City
concurs that a great many of the current news rack locations
would be eliminated from consideration as the current ordinance
is drafted because such locations are inappropriate for
newsracks. It is also the City's position that numerous
I'
"
.
Memo to City Commission
April 10, 1992
Page 2
different locations would be available for the placement of
newsracks.
The newspapers, while understanding some of our concerns,
believe that many of our problem areas could be better
addressed by the placement of driveways or expanded paved areas
which would allow drivers to pull off the roadway to get
newspapers without leaving a paved surface. At this point in
time, however, the newspapers have not indicated any willing-
ness to pay for the construction or maintenance of any such
areas. Instead they have alluded to compromises they have
reached in other jurisdictions wherein they have agreed to
limit newsracks to current existing locations.
I have some concerns with respect to the legal consideration
for the newspapers to enter into the agreements and that would
necessarily affect the enforceability of the agreements, but
moreover, even if enforceable, it is unlikely that the
advertising circulars and smaller newspapers would be willing
to similarly restrict themselves. In essence, we would be
relying solely on the good faith and good will of the major
newspapers for enforcement.
With respect to the standards for the news racks themselves, the
newspapers once again had uniform opposition to the determina-
tion that newsracks constituted signage and indicated that even
if agreement was reached with respect to locations, they would
file suit over our uniform color or shielding requirement. The
Sun Sentinel further indicated that it had recently filed suit
over Coral Springs' attempt to mandate such a requirement.
It should be noted that the meeting did not end without some
compromise being achieved. I agreed to recommend that the
proposed width of news racks be increased from 32" to 40". The
32" had originally been inserted to allow for double racks.
Apparently the industry standard for such double racks has
increased from 32" to 40". This would still be a reduction in
width from having two single racks at a location versus the one
double rack.
Direction is requested from the Commission as to whether
further attempts to modi fy the ordinance or enter into agree-
ments with the newspapers concerning news rack location and
standards is desired.
The principle areas of potential compromise or conflict are as
follows:
1- Location of the newsracks.
0'
"
.
.
.
Memo to City Commission
April 10, 1992
Page 3
2. Number of newsracks.
3 . Color of newsracks.
4. Size of lettering or logo on newsracks.
5. Whether the regulations would be imposed on private
property as well as public property and rights-of-way.
If the Commission feels that the uniform color is essential to
any satisfactory ordinance, it would be my recommendation that
the ordinance be passed in its current or slightly modified
form. I would not suggest that staff time be exerted in an
effort to jointly work out a proposed compromise.
It is my clear understanding that a court challenge would
follow, if the only change in the ordinance was the uniform
color requirement. If litigation is inevitable, I would not
waste staff time searching for a compromise until definitive
recommendations have been put forth by the newspapers.
Should any Commissioners have any questions concerning this
matter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. A copy
of the modified ordinance is attached for your perusal.
JSK : j w
Attachment
cc: David Harden, City Manager
Greg Luttrell, Traffic Engineer
Rich Bauer, Code Enforcement Officer
newsrak1. jsk
.
.,
c,
.
.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ARTICLE 6.3, "USE
AND WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY", OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY REPEALING,
"NEWSRACKS", AND ENACTING A NEW SECTION 6.3.3,
"NEWSRACKS, BENCHES AND OTHER UNATTACHED FIXTURES"
TO PROVIDE FOR THE APPLICATION OF THIS SECTION TO
ALL UNATTACHED FIXTURES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY;
PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR OBJECTIVE
STANDARDS FOR THE LOCATION OF UNATTACHED FIXTURES IN
THE RIGHT-OF-WAY; PROVIDING STANDARDS FOR INSTALLA-
TION AND MAINTENANCE OF NEWSRACKS; PROVIDING A BAN
ON THE LOCATION OF NEWS RACKS WITHIN RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; PROVIDING FOR
ENFORCEMENT BY CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT; PROVID-
ING FOR SPECIFIC APPELLATE REMEDIES; PROVIDING A
REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVID-
ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach has invested millions of
dollars in installing and maintaining streetscaping and landscaping
along the public rights-of-way within Delray Beach; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach is in the process of imple-
menting its Decade of Excellence Bond program' which will provide
additional funding of drainage, paving, and beautification of rights-
of-way within Delray Beach; and,
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has
maintained a strict sign code for a number of years, specifically
prohibiting off-site advertising; and,
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach is
desirous of providing safe traffic areas for pedestrians, bicyclists,
and motor vehicles; and,
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach
wishes to improve the aesthetics of rights-of-way within its residential
and commercial zoned areas; and,
WHEREAS, the residential rights-of-way within the City of
Delray Beach have not been designed to withstand constant traffic on the
nonpaved section of the right-of-way; and,
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that vehicular traffic
pulling onto swale areas on a continuing non-emergent basis causes
damage to the swale area which negatively affects the aesthetics of the
rights-of-way; and, ;
;l,
WHEREAS, the City ;Commission finds that vehicular traffic
pulling onto swale areas on a continuing non-emergent basis causes
damage to the swale area which negatively affects the drainage capabili-
ties of the swale area; and,
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that news racks which have
the corporate logo and coloration on them are signs within the meaning
of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, the use of newsracks and benches as signs is illegal
in Delray Beach and damages the aesthetic quality of our residential and
commercial zoned neighborhoods; and,
.,
'.
.
.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach
believes that improving the aesthetics of Delray Beach's residential and
commercial neighborhoods will improve the quality of life for the
citizens of Delray Beach; an~,
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that damaged swale areas
negatively affects property 'values adjacent to such swale areas and
rights-of-way; and,
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach
believes there is adequate areas of distribution available.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Article 6.3, "Use and Work in the Public
Right-of-Way", Section 6.3.3, "Newsracks" of the Land Development
Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach,
Florida, is hereby repealed, and a new Section 6.3.3, "Newsracks" of the
Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Delray Beach, is hereby enacted to read as follows:
Section 6.3.3 Newsracks, Benches and Other Unattached Fixtures in
the Right-of-Way: Any newsrack, bench and other non-attached fixture
(hereinafter collectively referred to as "movable fixtures") which rests
in whole or in part upon, or on any portion of the public right-of-way
or which projects onto, into, or over any part of a, public right-of-way,
or which is upon private property shall be loca7'ed and maintained in
accordance with this Section.
(A) Definitions. For the purpose of this subsection the following -- -- --- -
definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires
a different meaning.
"Advertising Circular." Any publication that contains only
advertising and no news reports.
"Auxiliary Lane." A turn lane or parking area.
"Bike Path." That portion of a right-of-way improved,
designed, or ordinarily used for bicycle traffic.
"Controlling Entity." The person or entity responsible for
placing and maintaining a movable fixture, the owner of the movable
fixture, or the publisher of the newspaper vended within a newsrack.
"Newsrack." Any self-service or cOin-operated box, container,
storage unit, or other dispenser installed, used, or maintained for the
display, sale, or distribution of newspaper or other news periodicals or
advertising circulars.
"Paved Surfaces." Any hard maintained surface used or built
for the purpose of transporting vehicles, bicycles or pedestrians.
Surfaces shall include, but not be limited to, asphalt, concrete, paver
block, tree grates and/or rocks.
"Public Agency." The city, county, or the state.
"Right-of-Way." All that area dedicated to public use or
otherwise owned by a public agency for public street purposes and shall
include, but not be limited to, roadways, swales, bike paths, and
sidewalks.
"Roadway." That portion of a right-of-way improved, designed,
or ordinarily used for vehicular traffic.
2 ORD. NO.
,..
..
'.
.
.
"Sidewalk." Any surface within a right-of-way provided for
the exclusive or primary use of pedestrians.
"Swale." Any area within a right-of-way which is not either a
bike path, sidewalk, or roadway. The terms shall also include any area
within a roadway which is not open to vehicular travel.
(B) Prohibited Locations:
( 1) Landscaped Areas: Movable fixtures shall not be placed or
installed or erected on any landscaped area within an improved
public right-of-way. The landscaped areas include, but are not
Hmi ted to, those areas in which the following ground cover
materials placed:
(a) Sod,
(b) Decorative plants, or
(c) Native plants maintained to match the surrounding
floor.
(2 ) Public Utilities: Movable fixtures shall not be placed,
installed, or erected to obstruct the use of any public utility
pole or structure. These areas are defined as follows:
(a) Drainage structures: Movable fixtures shall not be
placed within 15 feet of any drainage structure, inlet pipe, or
other physical object meant to carry water fo~drainage purposes,
Poles: Movable I shall be
(b) Utility fixtures not
physically attached, chained, bolted to a utility pole, or be
placed within 15 feet of a utility pole,
(c) Fire Hydrants: Movable fixtures shall not be
located within 25 feet of a fire hydrant.
(3 ) Traffic Control Devices: Movable fixtures shall not be
installed or erected to obs truct the function of traffic signals,
traffic signs or paved markings. These areas shall be defined as
follows:
( a) Traffic signals.
(1 ) Movable fixtures shall not be physically
attached, bolted, or chained to a traffic signal pole, or be within
15 feet of a traffic signal pole.
(2 ) Movable fixtures shall not be placed in such a
manner which obstructs :the free pedestrian flow to and from a
pedestrian traffic signal push button. In order to allow f or the
free pedestrian flow, and handicap access, to and from pedestrian
traffic signal push buttons, movable fixtures shall be placed at
least 30 inches away from such pedestrian traffic signal push
buttons.
(b) Traffic signs. Movable fixtures shall not be
physically attached, bolted, chained to, or touch a traffic sign or
post used for the support of a traffic sign or signs.
(4 ) Paved Surfaces: No moveable fixture shall be placed,
installed, or erected indirectly on a paved surface which is
intended primarily for the use of motor vehicles.
(a) Any movable fixture shall be placed or maintained on
a sidewalk shall leave a clear area for traffic of not less
than 5 feet.
3 ORD. NO.
'I
"
.
.
(b) Any movable fixture which is placed or maintained on
a bike path shall leave a clear area for traffic of not less
than 8 feet.
(5 ) Clear Zones: Movable fixtures shall not be installed,
attached, placed or erected within clear zones as defined in this
section. Clear zones are defined as follows:
(a) The area within five feet of the face of a six inch
high vertically faced curb.
(b) The area from the edge of the travel lane on the
adjacent road for the following distances:
Speed Limit of Adiacent Road Distance
25 mph 6 feet
30 10 feet
35 18 feet
40 - 45 24 feet
50 or more 30 feet
If the speed limit of the road is not visible, it is assumed that
the speed limit is 30 mph for purposes of this ordinance. If two
roads with di fferent speed limi ts intersect, the greater speed
limit distance shall prevail.
(c) The area measured from the edge/of an auxiliary lane
of the adjacent street within the following d~stances.
Speed Limit Auxiliary Lane Distance
25 mph 6 feet
30 10 feet
35 18 feet
40 - 45 24 feet
50 or more . 30 feet
If the speed l1mi t of the road is not visible, it is assumed that
the speed limit is 30 mph for purposes of this ordinance. If two
roads with different speed limits intersect, the greater speed
limit distance shall prevail.
(6 ) Sight Areas: Movable fixtures shall not be placed,
attached, installed or erected within the sight areas defined in
this section. For purposes of this ordinance, sight areas extend
vertically 3 feet from the pavement elevation.
(a) Traffic Sign Sight Area - The sight area adjacent to
traffic signs shall be the triangular area in advance of the
traffic sign delineated by the following area: a line extending
from the pavement in a perpendicular direction to the base of the
traffic sign, another line along the pavement for 300 feet, and the
hypotenuse connecting the two lines.
(b) Residential Driveway Sight Areas
1. Single Family Residences - The sight area
adjacent to single family residential driveways shall be
the rectangular area extending 30 feet from the edge of
the driveway at the point where the driveway meets the
pavement edge, ~xtending 15 feet from the pavement edge
towards the residence.
2. Other Residences - The sight area adjacent to
all other residential driveways shall be a triangular
area defined as follows: A line commencing at the center
of the driveway approach lane extending 15 feet from the
edge of the pavement shall define the base of the
4 ORO. NO.
-.-_0. -,
.,
'.
.
,
triangle, the hypotenuse shall be a straight line
connecting this point with a point X feet both left and
right measured from the center of the driveway approach
lane along the near side edge of pavement.
Speed Limit Distance
25 - 35 mph 325 feet
40 400 feet
45 475 feet
50 or more 650 feet
(c) Non-Residential Driveway Sight Area. The sight area
adjacent to non-residential driveways shall be that area
as defined in Section Newsracks shall not occupy a space
measured as defined in Section 6.3.3 B(5)(b)2.
(7 ) Other Areas: Movable fixtures shall not be placed,
attached, installed, or erected in any of the following areas:
(a) The area within 50 feet of any railroad track,
(b) On any city property, unless the location has been
specifically permitted by the city Manager or his
designee, and
(c) The area within medians of a divided roadway.
(8 ) Movable fixtures shall not be placed on any roadway, bike
path, sidewalk or adjacent swale area within single family
residential zoned districts of the City. I
(9 ) The use of a bench for advertising purposes is strictly
prohibited.
(D) Standards for Newsracks Maintenance and Installation:
(1 ) No more than one news rack containing the same issue
or edition of the same publication shall be located within the -.- --
same block or 1,000 feet, whichever is the lesser distance, on
the same side of the street, provided, however, a controlling
enti ty may locate newsrack closer to each other if a public
need is determined to exist. A public need may be established
by the following method, but such method is not exclusive. A
controlling entity desiring to establish a public need, may
place a news rack at the proposed location after notice to the
City for a period of one month. If during that one month test
period, the average circulation from that news rack equals or
exceeds 75 percent of the capacity of the newsrack, the public
need is established and the news rack may remain at its
location.
(2 ) Any news rack which in whole or in part rests upon,
in, or over any public property or right-of-way shall comply
with the following standards:
(a) Single news racks shall not exceed 4 feet, 6
inches in height, 40 inches wide and 24 inches in depth.
(c) Coin operated news racks shall be equipped with
a coin return mechanism to permit a person wishing to
purchase a newspaper or periodical to secure an immediate
refund in the event the news rack is inoperable. At all
times, the coin return mechanism shall be maintained in
good working order.
(d) The controlling entity shall permanently affix
to its news racks a label which states a 24 hour operable
telephone number of a working telephone service which the
5 ORO. NO.
-
Of
,I
.
\
customer may call to report a malfunction, or to secure a
refund in the event of a malfunction of the coin return
mechanism. The label shall feature clearly on its face,
the name and address of the distributor to give the
notices provided for in this chapter.
(e) The controlling entity shall maintain each
news rack in a neat and clean condition, and in good
repair at all times.
(f) All news racks shall have a uniform light brown
finish. Provided, however, that newsracks may be of any
color if they are shielded from view on three sides in a
covering built and permitted in accordance with the
City's Building Code.
( g) All news racks which are placed, attached,
installed or erected in accordance with this ordinance on
surfaces intended primarily for the use of pedestrians
shall leave a clear area for traffic of not less than 5
feet.
(h) All news racks which are placed, attached,
installed or erected on paved surfaces intended primarily
for the use of bicycles shall leave a clear area for
traffic of not less than 8 feet.
I I
(0) Restrictions on Advertising: I
Newsracks shall not be used for advertising or publicity
purposes other than that pertaining to the display, sale or
purchase of the newspaper or news periodicals sold or dis-
tributed therein. Only one (1 ) advertising sign, not
exceeding two square feet in area, may be placed on a
news rack. In addition to the advertising sign, the con-
trolling entity may display once, on a newsrack, the name of
the publication. The name of the publication may be displayed
in lettering no greater than 12" in height.
(E) Abandonment:
In the event a news rack remains empty for a period of 30
continuous days, it shall be deemed abandoned, and may be
treated in the same manner as provided in section (F) below
for movable fixtures in violation of the provisions of this
subchapter.
(F) Enforcement; Correction of Violation:
(1 ) Upon determination by a Code Enforcement Of ficer
that a movable fixture has been installed, used, or maintained
in violation of the provisions of this subchapter. An order
to correct the offending condition shall be issued to the
entity controlling the movable fixture.
(2 ) The order to correct the offending condition shall
specifically describe the offending condition and/or violation
and suggest actions necessary to correct the condition or
violation. Such order shall be mailed by certi fied mail
return receipt requested to the controlling entity.
(3 ) Failure to properly correct the offending condition
or violation within 15 days after the mailing date of the
order, shall result in the offending movable fixture being
removed by the city. Any movable fixture removed by the city
hereunder shall be stored at the controlling entity's expense
for a period of 30 days. The movable fixture shall be
6 ORO. NO.
--. .. .
.,
'.
.
released upon a proper showing of ownership and payment of any
and all storage charges. In the event the movable fixture is
not claimed within the 30 day period, the movable fixture may
be sold at public auction and the proceeds applied first to
removal, administrative and storage charges, and the
remainder, if any, then paid into the General Fund of the
City.
(4 ) If the controlling entity is not identified on the
moveable fixture, it will be considered abandoned and posted
as such.
( 5) If the movable fixture is posted as abandoned and
not removed within 7 days from the date of posting, or the
City is not contacted by the controlling entity within 7 days
from receipt of the order, the City may remove the movable
fixture immediately. The City shall store the movable fixture
for 30 days and if not claimed within that time, the City may
dispose of the movable fixture in any manner it deems appro-
priate. If the movable fixture is claimed, the entity
claiming the movable fixture shall pay for all removal,
administrative and storage charges prior to release of the
fixture. If the charges are not paid within 15 days of claim
being made, the City may dispose of the movable fixture.
(6 ) At least ten days prior to the public auction, the
City Clerk shall publish a description of/the movable fixture,
the location from where it was removedj and notice of the
auction in a newspaper of general circul~tion in the city and
shall provide the controlling entity identified on the movable
fixture, or if otherwise known, with written notification of
the auction by certified mail, return receipt requested.
Provided, however, that the City Manager, or his designee, may
dispose of the movable fixture in any manner it sees fit,
including negotiating the release of the movable fixture to
the controlling entity for less than full payment of all
storage charges if the controlling entity is of the opinion
that such disposal will be more advantageous to the City than
auctioning off the movable fixture.
(7 ) In the event the controlling entity appeals the
order to correct the offending condition, as provided for in
Subsection 6.3.3(G), below, then removal of the movable
fixture shall be stayed pending final disposition of the
appeal, which final disposition shall include any judicial
review. The city shall reimburse the controlling entity any
storage charges paid pursuant to an order issued by the city
in the event the decision on the appeal is rendered favorable
to the controlling entity.
(G) Appeals: Any person or controlling entity aggrieved by any
order, finding, or determination, taken under the provisions of this
ordinance, (hereinafter an appellant) may file an appeal with the Code
Enforcement Board for the City of Oelray Beach. The appellant must
effect their appeal within 15 days after receipt of the order mailed to
the appellant pursuant to this ordinance. In order to effect the
appeal, the appellant must deliver their letter of appeal, briefly
stating the basis of their appeal, to the Clerk of the Code Enforcement
Board. The Code Enforcement Board shall hold a hearing on the appeal no
later than 30 days following the receipt of the letter of appeal, unless
the parties mutually agree to an extension thereof. The appellant shall
be given at least 7 days written notice of the time and place of the
hearing. The Board shall give the appellant and any other interested
party a reasonable opportunity to be heard in order to show cause why
the fixture is not violating this ordinance. At the conclusion of the
hearing the Board shall make a final and conclusive determination. The
determination shall be reduced to writing and signed by the Board and
7 ORO. NO.
-
..
'.
- -
filed in the Office of the City Clerk within 15 days of the hearing and
a copy shall be sent to the appellant. The decision of the Board shall
be effective when rendered. The decision of the Board may be appealed
as provided for by law.
Section 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which
are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 3. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective immedi-
ately upon its passage on second and final reading; provided, however
that the City's formal enforcement measures shall not begin for a period
of one hundred twenty (120) days.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the _____ day of , 199 - .
MAY 0 R
ATTEST: "
I
City Clerk
First Reading
Second Reading
,. - ...--
8 ORD. NO.
'f
"
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER'7v
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM i 12 .A.- MEETING OF APRIL 14. 1992
ORDINANCE NO. 15-92
DATE: April 10, 1992
This is a first reading of an ordinance regulating the placement of
newsracks and other movable fixtures within the City's
rights-of-way. At the time the agenda was completed, the City
Attorney's office was still revising the draft ordinance. The
ordinance and related backup material will be forwarded to you prior
to the April 14th regular meeting.
'.
"
,-' ./
'.
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: ~::E~:::GER
FROM: ID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 14, 1992
NEWSRACK ORDINANCE
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
approval of this proposed ordinance on first reading. The
ordinance is being presented by the Office of the City
Attorney.
BACKGROUND:
This item was initiated by direction of the City Commission. It
has been previously discussed in work sessions. A draft
ordinance was reviewed and referred to the Planning and Zoning
Board.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at its
meeting of March 26th at which time it was forwarded with the
following recommendation and comment:
That the ordinance be approved upon first reading on April
14th and that the subject matter and direction of the
regulations is recommended for approval. However, the
Board will give further review to standards which are
contained therein and will provide further recommendations
at its meeting of April 20th. Those recommendations will
be presented to the City Commission at the time of the
public hearing and second reading. Those recommendations
will not affect the caption.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approval of the ordinance on first reading and set a
public hearing date.
Attachment:
* Ordinance by others
,.
[ITY DF DElHAY BEA[H
100 N.W, 1st AVENUE . DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 . 407/243.7000
April 13, 1992
Mr. George Liddy
Liddun International, Inc.
2929 East Commercial Boulevard, Suite 610
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33308
Dear Mr. Liddy:
As you are aware, I met last week with Tom Seitz and Tony
Chiricosta to review your letter of March 31, 1992, outlining
what would be needed to bring the Virginia Slims Tournament to
Delray Beach. I am pleased to report that we agreed between
us that we can provide all the facilities requested in your
letter.
The City Attorney, Mr. Jeff Kurtz, is drafting an agreement
incorporating the terms outlined in your letter. He has tried
to reach you this afternoon by telephone to discuss some
questions he has .concerning definition of some terms,
insurance to be provided by the City, and a fixed yearly
rental as requested by you. We like your proposal of a fixed
yearly rental, we just need to determine the amount.
Our draft agreement is to be reviewed by the German group's
attorney tomorrow. Hopefully, I will be able to send you a
copy on Wednesday.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
iW ~rJ~~
DAVID T. HARDEN
City Manager
DTH:nr
THE EFFORT ALW"'"\YS ~/1 ,uTTERS
'.