Loading...
08-13-91 Regular . . CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA - CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 13, 1991 - 6:00 P,M, PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 P.M, COMMISSION CHAMBERS RULES FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPAT~ON 1. PUBLIC COMM2NT: The public is encouraged to offer commenLS, However, as a general rule, the order of presentation shall be as follows: City Staff, comments by the public, Commission discussion and official action, City Commission meetings are business meetings and as such, the Commission retains the right to limit discussion on any issue. In most cases remarks by an individual will be limited to three minutes or less (10 minutes for group presentations). The Mayor or presiding officer may adjust the amount of time allocated at his/her discretion. A. Public Hearings: Any citizen is entitled to speak on items under this section. B. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items from the Public: Any citizen is entitled to be heard concerning any matter within the scope of jurisdiction of the Commission under this section. The Commission may withhold comment or direct the City Manager to take action on requests or comments. C, Regular Agenda and First Reading Items: When extraordinary circumstances or reasons exist and at the discretion of the Commission, citizens may speak on any official agenda item under these sections. 2. SIGN IN SHEET: Prior to the start of the Commission Meeting, those individuals wishing to address public hearing and/or non-agendaed items should complete the sign-in sheet located on the right side of the dais. If for some reason you are not able to complete the sign-in sheet prior to the start of the meeting, you will not be precluded from addressing the Commission on an appropriate item. The primary purpose of the sign-in sheet is to assist staff with record keeping. Therefore, when you come up to the podium to make your comments, kind.ly complete the sign-in sheet if you have not already done so. . 3. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION: At the appropriate time, please step up to the podium and state, for the record, your name and address. All comments will be addressed to the Commission as a body and not to individuals. Any person making impertinent or slanderous remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the Commission shall be barred from speaking further to the Commission by the presiding officer, unless permission to continue or again address the Commission is granted by majority vote of the Commission members present. . Agenda Meeting of 8/13/91 APPELLATE PROCEDURES Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission '",ith respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, a~d for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record lncludes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, The City does not provide or prepare such record. AGENDA 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation. 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 4. Agenda approval. Action: Motion to approve, 5. Approval of Regular Meeting minutes of July 23, 1991 and Special Meeting Minutes of July 30, 1991. 6. Proclamations: A. Clown Week - August 4 through la, 1991. B. Sickle Cell Month - September 1991. 7. Presentations: 8. Consent Agenda: City Manager recommends approval. A. CONTRACT LANGUAGE/INDEMNIFICATION CLAUSE: Approve standard condition language which is to be included in all contracts for construction and general consulting services. B. ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL STATEMENT/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT: Accept the Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for Fiscal Year 1991/1992 for Community Development Block Grant funding and authorize staff to forward this proposal to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for funding consideration. C. AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT A GRANT APPLICATION: Authorize staff to submit a grant application to the Solid Waste Authority for grant funding in the amount of $57,913 to expand our recycling and related educational programs. -2- Agenda Neeting of 8/13/91 D, INCREASE IN HEALTH AND DENTl\L INSU~~NCE PREMIUMS: Approve the i~crease of the health and dental insurance premiums for employees and their dependents to be effecLive October I, 1991, E. PJ..TIFICATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WAS'rEWATER TREATMENT AND Dr SPOSl-.L BOARD OPERATING BUDGET: Ratify' SCRWTD Board operating budget for fisc3l year 1991-1992 in the amount of $3,210,000. F, RATIFICATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL RSGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATHENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD CAP I 'l'AL BUDGET: Ratify SCRWTD Board action approving Capital Expenditures for fiscal year 1991-1992 in the amount of $39,362. Expenditures are to be assessed 50% to Boynton and 50"6 to Delray Beach, G. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AND SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO, 1/0'BRIEN, SUITER AND O'BRIEN: Approve the contract between the City and O'Brien, SUlter and O'Brien for surveying services and approve Service Authorization No. 1 in the amount of $4,OO~ for surveying services in conjunction with the Road Reconstruction Program - Part A ( Tr:opic Isles). Funding is available in the Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/ Street Reconstruction (Account No. 225-3162-544-61.17). H. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AND SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. l/PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. : Approve the contract between the City dnd Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc. for sanitary engineering services and approve Service Authorization No. 1 in the amount of $6,117 for consulting services to evaluate alternatives to the upgrades/improvements proposed for the Haster Pump Station at Veteran's Park, Funding is available in the 1991 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond (Account No. 447-5166-536-33.11) . 1. REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT: Approve the request from Data Flow Systems, Inc. for final payment in the amount of $10,256 for completion of the Radio Telemetry Project with funding from 1984 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond! Lift Station Telemetry (Account No, 441-5162-536-60.36) , Account balance $10,256. J. REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT: Approve the request from Post, Buckley, Schuh, and Jernigan, Inc. for final payment in the amount of $9,997.12 for laboratory services in conjunction with the Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project with funding from 1984 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Water Treatment Plant Expansion (Account No. 441-5162-536-60.76/Account balance $9~997.12). K. EMERGENCY REPAIR/MANHOLE: Approve the emergency repair of a sinking manhole at 815 Foxpoint Circle, in the Hamlet and approve the award of contract to.D.S. Eakins in the amount of $15,780 with funding from 1991 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Repair and Replacement - Manholes (Account No. 447-5169-536-60,31) . Account balance $173,428. -3- "'I Agenda Meeting of 8/13/91 - L. RATIFICATION OF RULES FOR THE BOARD OF CONSTRUCTION APPEALS: Ratify the rules for the Board of Construction Appeals. M. AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER INTEREST EARNINGS/DECADE OF EXCELLENCE BOND ISSUE: Authorize the transfer of $30,000 in interest earnings from the Decade of Excellence Bond Issue to the Decade of Excellence Bond Fund/Golf Course Projects Account Nos. 22~ 4762 <;; "'2 60.69 (SIO,OOO) ~nd 22~ 4762 ~72 60.99 (S20, 000) . N. AU~HORIZATION TO EX?END FUNDS LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST FUND: Authorlze staff to expend funding in the amount of 9,225 from the Law Enfo~cemen~ Trust Fund to purchase a Computer Voice Stress Analyzer and to cover the cost of the attendant training sessions. O. REQUESrr TO ERECT STRUCTURE IN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY: Consider a request from the owner of Bethesda Bargain Box to erect an awning on the front of the building located on 12 North Federal Highway over the City's right-of -y.lay. P. REQUEST TO MODIFY GRANT AGREEMENT/AUBURN TRACE JOINT VENTURE: Consider a request from Auburn Trace Joint Venture to modify the grant agreement by amending the repayment schedule to allow payments to commence in 1995 and to allow the payment of three equal payments on the Purchase Money mortgage payment as opposed to one balloon payment. Q. CHANGE ORDER NO. l/DEES CONTRACTING: Approve Change Order No. 1 to the contract between the City and Dees Contracting for the rehabilitation of the 1/2 Million Gallon Water Storage Tank. This Change Order decreases the contract price by $6,461 by implementing recommendations made by the project Engineer. R. RESOLUTION NO. 62-91: A Resolution abandoning a portion of right-of-way of N.W. 18th Avenue in conjunction with the Congress Industrial Service Center development. S. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL: :Approve the final plat for Congress Industrial Service Center located on the east side of Congress Avenue between Atlantic Avenue and Lake Ida Road. , T. RESOLUTION NO. 59-91: A Resolution vacating and abandoning a 16 foot alleyway located on the north side of S.E. 10th Street, between S.E. 5th and S.E. 6th Avenues in conjunction with the Shoney's Restaurant development. U. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL: Approve the final plat for the 9th Street Plaza (Shoney's Restaurant) located on the north side of S.E. 10th Street, between S.E. 5th and S.E. 6th Avenues. V. RESOLUTION NO. 60-91: A Resolution assessing costs for -4- Agenda Meeting of 8/13/91 - abatement action required to board up an uLsafe structure at 607 S.W. 9th Street. W. RESOLU'I'ION NO. 61-91: A Resolution assessing costs for aba~ement-ac~ion required to remove nuisances on 35 properties throughout t~e City. X. AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS: 1. Rehabilitation, Refurbishment and Overhaul 1978 1000 GPM Pumper-- Fire Department- Southern Coach, Inc. , in the amount of $19,140 with funding from Repair and Upkeep Automotive (Account No. 001-2315-526-33.35) . Account balance $29,267. 2. Janitorial Services - City Hall, City Attorney's Office, Environmental Services Complex and Central Fire Station - Various vendors, in the amount indicated below, with funding from various departmental Janitorial Services (Account No. XXX-XXXX-XXX-33. 17): -City Hall - National Cleaning of Florida - $28,632. -City Attorney's Office - National Cleaning of Florida - $4,260. -Environmental Services Complex - National Cleaning of Florida - $8,716. -Fire Station - Jani-King - $5,546. 3. Hater Main Extension/Pine Ridge Road - Church of the Palms - Environmental Services - Metra Industries in the amount of $98,823 with funding from 1991 Revenue Bond Construction/Water Distribution Improvements (Account No. 447-5174-536-61.78). Account balance $284,468. 4. Fleet Management Application Software- Fleet Management - HTE, Inc. in the amount of $35,000 (plus travel ar ~l training costs - $5,250) with funding from City Garage Capital Outlay (Account No. 501-3311-591-60.89) . Account balance $44,211.64. 5. Diesel and Unleaded Gasoline - Annual Contract - Various vendors, in the amount indicated below, with funding from various departmental Gas, Oil, and Lubricant account: -Unleaded gasoline (transpor~)- - Coastal Fuels Marketing, Inc. - $148,000. -Unleaded gasoline (tankwagon) - B.P. Oil Company - $16,000. -Diesel Fuel - B.P. Oil Company - $6 , 000 . 6. Hardscape, Sculpture and Landscape/Pineapple Grove - Community Improvement- ARZ Builders, Inc. in the amount of $94,153 with funding from Beautification Trust/Federal Highway -5- Agenu:1 !v1eeting of 8/13/91 . - Linton to North End (Account No. 333-4141-572-61.27) . Account balance $140,410. 7. Accounts Receivable Application Softi,lare- Finance Department - H'rE, Inc. In the amount of $10,000, plus travel and training costs not to exceed $2,020 with funding from Flnance/Application Software (Account No. 001-1811-513-60.86/Account balance $14,443), Finance/Travel Expenses (Account No. 0Ol-1811-513-34.57/Account balance $1,000) and, Finance/Computer Training (Account No. 001-1511-513-33.57/Account balance $2,122. 8. Bulkhead Replacement/Seawall and Marginal Docks - Veteran's Park - B.K. Marine Construction in the amount of $220,630 with funding from Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Redevelopment Veteran's Park (Account No. 225-4126-572-61.63/Account balance $448,104) and General Construction Fund (334-4126-572-61.63/Account balance $100,000). FIND Grant will reimburse 50% of the project cost. 9. 4th Avenue Sidewalk Construction - Environmental Services - Five Star Construction Company in the amount of $94,369 with funding from Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Sidewalks S.W. 4th Avenue/Atlantic - Linton (Account No. 225-3162-541-61.44). Account balance $103,369. 10. Computer Equipment - Environmental Services - Microage in the amount of $13,319.25 for hardware and T.W. Communications in the amount of $492.40 for cables with funding from Computer Software/Hardware (Account No. 442-5178-536-64.09. Account balance $57,790.46. 9. Regular Agenda: A. REVIEW OF APPEALABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS OF VARIOUS BOARDS: Consider accepting actions and decisions made by the Planning and Zoning Board, Site Plan Review and Appearance Board and the Historic Preservation Board during the period of July 23 through l>.ugust 12, 1991. B. REQUEST FOR WAIVERS/FINAL PLAT RECONSIDERATION/REBECCA'S LANDING: Approve waivers for the placement of finger piers and dolphin piles on Lots 1 and 2 Rebecca's Landing and reconsider the final plat. City Engineer and Plarining and Zoning Board recommend approval subject to conditions. C. APPEAL OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD DECISION: Consider an appeal of a Historic Preservation Board decision denying a demolition permit for 36 Palm Square. Planning and Zoning Director recommends denial. -6- Agenda Meeting of 8/13/91 - D. APPEAL OF PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD DECISION: Consider a request for appeal of a Planning and Zoning Board decision denying a preliminary plat request to subdivide Block 1, Lots 1 and 2 , Sr.vinton Oaks, into six individual lots. Planning and Zoning Director recommends denial. E. CHANGE ORDER NO. l/RIC-MAN INTERNl>.TIONAL, INC: Approve Change Order No. 1 to the City's contract witt.... Ric-man International, Ii1c. for $112,852 to construct water, sewer, and drainage lines along N.E. 1 s t Ave. I N.E. 1st St. , and the adjacent a"lleyways (Old School Square) . Funding is available in 1991 Revenue Bond/Water Distribution Improvements (Account No. 447-5174-536-61.78/Balance $284,468), Water and Sewer Operating Capital (p.ccount No. 441-5161-536-60.90jBalance $99,500) and; Decade of Excellence/Old School Square Historical Renovations (Account No. 225-3169-559-61.69/Balance $303,522). City Manager recommends approval. F. SERVIC2 AUTHORIZATION NO. 5/CURRIE SCHNEIDER ASSOCIATES, AIA, PA: Approve Service Authorization No. 5 to the contract between the City and Currie Schneider and Associates in the amount of $20,900 for a Value Engineering Analysis for the Fire Headquarters project. Funding is available in the Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Central Fire Station (Account No. 225-2311-522-61.56). City Manager recommends approval. G. CANCELLATION OF BID AWARD AND AWARD OF BID TO SECOND LOW RESPONSIVE BIDDER: Cancel the contract between the City and D & L Telecommunications for Phase I of the Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project and award the contract to the second low responsive bidder Altair Maintenance in the amount of $123,613.04 with funding from 1991 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/ Repair and Renewal Sanitary Sewers/r<1anholes (Account No. 447-5169-536-60.31/Account balance $300,000) and Water and Sewer Repair and Replacement/Manhole Rehabilitation (Account No. 442-5178-536-61.84) . City Manager recommends approval. H. BEACH CLEANING CONTRACT: Determine whether the current beach cleaning contract should be renewed; or, whether this work should be bid out. I. CONSIDER REQUEST TO ALLOW INVESTMENT OF PENSION FUNDS IN ISRAELI BONDS: Consider the request to allow the Pension Board the option of investing pension funds in the State of Israel Bonds. City Manager recommends denial. J. APPOINTMENT OF TWO MEMBERS TO THE EDUCATION BOARD: Appoint two members to fill the vacancies on the Education Board. K. AUTHORIZATION TO DISPLAY SPECIAL EVENT BANNERS: Approve a request from the Haitian American Community Center to display -7- Agenda HeE:ting of 8/13/91 . sp8clal e...;en~ banners at fcur locations within the City. City Manager recommends approval. 10. Public Hearings: A. ORDINANCE NO. 49-91 : Ar. Ordinance amending the list of cone. i ti.onal uses and structures allowed within the Community Facilities (CF) zone district to provide for commercial activities and businesses upon publicly owned lands as a conditional use. City Manager and Planning and Zoning Board recommend approval. 1. REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL: Consider a request for conditional use approval to operate a cruise boat and ticket sales at Veteran's Park. Planning and Zoning Board recommends approval. 2. ALTERNATE ACTION REGARDING CRUISE SHIP AND TICKET SALES AT VETERAN'S PARK: Consider declaring the cruise ship operation and ticket sales at Veteran's Park a "recreational function" . 3. LICENSE AGREEMENT'/ I SAN CHARTERS, INC. (d/b/a STILLWATER CRUISES) : Approve a license agreement between the City and Isan Charters, Inc. (d/b/a Stillwater Cruises) to permit a cruise boat and ticket sales operation at Veteran's Park. B. ORDINANCE NO. 51-91: An Ordinance amending the Land Development Regulations and the Code of Ordinances to provide a uniform time, 90 days, by which a building must be connected to the the City's sanitary sewer system. City Manager recommends approval. C. ORDINANCE NO. 54-91: An Ordinance amending the Land Development Regulations by enacting a definition for the term "Flea Market" , by providing rules and regulations governing Flea Markets within the City, and to provide for Flea Markets as a conditional use in the Central Business District. Two public hearings are required on this Ordinance. If passed the second public hearing will be held on August 27th. 11. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items from the Public- Immediately following Public Hearings. A. City Manager's response to prio~ public comments and inquiries. B. From the Public. 12. First Readings: A. ORDINANCE NO. 52-91: An Ordinance amending Chapter 52, "Water" I Section 52.83 (A) , "Backflow Prevention Devices; When -8- . Agenda Meeting of 8/13/91 Required; Specifications", Of the Code of Ordinances, correcting a reference to a State rule. If passed public hearing August 27th. B. ORDINANCE NO. 53-91: An Ordinance amending the Land Developmen~ Regulations as to the appropriate appeal procedure from decisions made by the Board of Adjustment and Board of Construction Appeals. If passed public hearing August 27th. C. ORDINANCE NO. 55-91: An Ordinance amending the Land Development Regulations to allm.., commercial parking lots as a conditional use i~ the in the Automotive Commercial (AC) District. If passed public hearing August 27th. 13. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items: A. Commission B. City Attorney C. City Manager . -9- ... !JTY DF DELRAY BEAEH WHEREAS, Clowns can make people forget their troubles, their afflictions, their handicaps, and depressions; and, WHEREAS, clowning encourages laughter in the young, the old, the rich and the poor; and, WHEREAS, whoever has seen the smile on the face of a youngster or has heard the laugh of an elderly person, knows a love deeper than can be vocally expressed; and, WHEREAS, those who have seen sadness and despair disap- pear and joy prevail are truly blessed. Clowns, with big red noses, baggy clothes and a sense of humor, go into rest home s , hospitals, retirement homes, institutions for the handicapped and places where people need the joy that only they can deliver; and, WHEREAS, Clowns are so vital to our parades and celebra- tions, where they work wonders on helping the young and old smile and laugh with them. Today, as always, clowns and the spirit they represent are a symbol of vitality and happiness; and, WHEREAS, the laugh-makers are truly blessed - they heal the heart of the sad and lonely, asking nothing in return but a smile or a laugh, NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim August 4 - 10, 1991, as, "CLOWN WEEK" in the City of Delray Beach and encourage all citizens to recognize the contributions made by these thoughtful and generous individu- als. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed this 13th day of August, 1991. MAY 0 R THOMAS E. LYNCH . ~f\ - .. . September, 1990 Clowning Around Page 12 ~.. ~MI . --~~ ~ I ..... ...m.Alilm'lten - m '!'\U:!J - g ~_II.n.a ~ ~ f \,J...f' ~ . - _ - ' -. . - -' BEf . IlZf ~ ~ ~ iN BE! .. I!Zt I TO TI-E PElFLE (F KANSAS, GREETINGS: 1m lEt BEf _ llI-EREAS, the ClOWNS CF MRICA, Tt-E llffiLO CLOWN ASSOCIATI~. have proclaimed the n KIll first week in August to be National Clown Week; and BEt a Wf-EREAS, Clowns can make people forget their troubles, their afflictions, their ~ ~ IIiI handicaps, and depressions; and ~ n .. Wf-EREAS, clowning encourages laughter in the young, the old, the rich and the poor; ~ II and ~ 1m ~ Wf-EREAS, clowns can cut through bigotry and class distlnction: - JII NOW, Tt-EREFffiE, I, MIKE HAYDEN, GOVERNffi CF Tt-E STATE CF KANSAS, do hereby proclaim ~ ~ _ the week of' August I through 7, 1990, as 1m .. ~ II NATI~AL ClOWN WEEK ~ - I in Kansas, and urge the citizens of Kansas to recognize the contributions made by these ~ fm ~ ~ thoughtful and generous individuals. ~ I DONE At the Capital in Topeka ~t Under the Great Seal af II the State this 16th day II af July, A. 0., 1990. .. - I 'Zi/ / dv I / /....U.'--'o.-.. c1y.L / R ) ~ at ;' \ ( (r;if:l.?CLl ~C ) ~ .. - Secretary f Stat II r--" I BEE / + ~... II ../_-~L... \ I { ........(--' t=Et Assistant Secreta y af State I=D I I .. I .- ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ - , - September, 1990 CloWning Around Page 13 ~. . ~ ~. ~~..- ~ DECLARATION WHEREAS, whoever has seen the smile 0:1 the face of a youngster or has heard the laugh of an elderly person, kr::.ows a love deeper than can be vocaily express~d: ?no whEREAS. those who have seen sadness and despair disappear and joy pr~vail are t:-uly blessed. Ali across America, and particular!)' here in Utah, clown::; with big red Doses, baggy clothes and a sense of humor. go into rest hom~s, hospitals, retirement homes, inst.itutions for the handicapped and places where people need tl1e joy th..l cnly they can deliver. That same small group of the populace is so vital to our parades and celebrations, where thE'Y work wonders on helping the young and old smile ClnJ laugh with them. The pay in the hearts of a clown is that knowledge of compassion, so richly rewarded Todl1Y, "'s always, clowns and the spirit tl-.ey represent are a symbol of the vitality aud happiness of the state. They are a vital entity for the builders and growers and governors; and \VHEREAS, iL has beeu noted in folklore tha~ the d.:JWllS are alway:.; s3.d ::.t he3It fer they cannot d.ivulge th~ sadness and pain of thiOir surroundings. Yet they v.ill leave ~~~;l='€:S ::::~ jar ..t..h~:-r.~.:- th~J"' J", :.r:-: ~~k~ ~~-? p~lll and m13ery with th~ln: .:lnd WHEREAS. the laugh-makers are truly blessed: they ht:!al the heart of !.he s..d and lonely, asking nothing in return but a smile or a laugh, and WBEREAS, to call public attention to the charitable activities of downs and the wholesorDp. entertainment they provide for our citizens. the Congre:s by a joint resolution approved October 9, 1970 (Public Law 91-433); the President has designated the wp.ek of August 1 through 7 a<; National C10wn Week; NOW, THEREFO~E, I, NOT"man H. Bange..ter, Governor of the State of Utah, do herp.by declare August 1 - 7,1990, as CLOWN WEEK in Utah and encourage all citizens tCi recognize the contributions made by clowns in their entertainmeHt ;l.\. hospitals, charitable institutions. institutions for the handicapped, and generally helping to lift the spirits and boost the morale of our people. 7l~t:;~d:- Governor , '" CITY OF DELRRY HEREM i, ; , WHEREAS, the Sickle Cell Foundation of Palm Beach County has been instrumental in providing emergency economic assistance for medical and other supportive services for persons with Sickle Cell Disease: and, WHEREAS, the Sickle Cell Foundation is also instrumental in. aiding in the dissemination of knowledge about the disease through education of the public: and, WHEREAS, the Sickle Cell Foundation provides Sickle Cell disease and Sickle Cell trait counseling to individuals and their families: and, WHEREAS, the Sickle Cell Foundation provides education assistance and scholarships for students with Sickle Cell disease: and, WHEREAS, the Sickle Cell Foundation provides screening and testing on an individual basis to individuals and their fami- lies: and, WHEREAS, the Sickle Cell Foundation will have several activities including its 12th Annual Red and White Ball in order of raising monies to support the activities of the Foundation, NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim the month of September, 1991, as, "SICKLE CELL MONTH" in the City of Delray Beach. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed this 13th day of August, 1991. MAY 0 R THOMAS E. LYNCH ~ , . loB . . ~ic'lE- CE-ll 9ounJation of Palm !BE-ach County, !Jnc. Post Office Box 2402, West Palm Beach, Florida 33402 Telephone 305/833-3113 SlCKLERS NEED HELP TOOl I.'; , ' ; \ "v"/' t r-.J w u~~{. .J~ 1 7 ,- r. " ;SSION ' , July 5, 1991 .....:-,.;..'....:>fIl.. " The Honorable Thomas Lynch, Mayor City of Delray Beach 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Fl 33444 Dear Mayor Lynch: I am requesting the City Commission and the City Manager to pass the attached resolution declaring the month of September, 1991 as Sickle Cell Month. The Sickle Cell Foundation of Palm Beach County, Inc. , will have a month of activities including the 12th Annual Red and White BaIlon September 7th from 9pm - lam. A review of the enclosed brochure will identify the services provided by the Foundation which are primarily funded by the proceeds from various fundraising activities during September. Please call our office and let me know when this resolution will be on the Commissioner's agenda. I or a representative of the Foundation will be present to accept the resolution. Please do not hesitate to call should you have questions or if you need more information. Thank you for your consideration of this request and for your continued cooperation. What you do in the fight DOES MATTER! Respectfully yours, ~ t!hkrt: Sandra Close Turnquest, resident RECE'VED 1!;1{ql cnvCLERK MEMBER: 0 National Association for Sickle Cell Disease, Inc. (NASCD) National Health Agencies. Combined Federal Campaign Florida State Sickle Cell Foundation (FSSCF) . . ~ r RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF SICKLE CELL FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, INC. 1600 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33407 (407) 833-3113 WHEREAS. The Sickle Cell Foundation of Palm Beach County has been instrumental in providing emergency economic assistance for medical and otller supportive services for persons with Sickle Cell Disease and. WHEREAS. The Sickle Cell Foundation is also instrumental in aiding in the dissemination of knowledge about the disease through education of tlle public and. WHEREAS. The Sickle Cell Foundation provides Sickle Cell disease and Sickle Cell trait counseling to individuals and their families and. WHEREAS. The Sickle Cell Foundation provides educational assistance and scholarships for students with Sickle Cell disease and, WHEREAS. The Sickle Cell Foundation provides screening and testing on an individual basis to individuals and their families and. WHEREAS. The Sickle Cell Foundation will have several activities including its 12th Annual Red and White Ball in order of raising monies to support the activities of the Foundation. NOW TI-lEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED. that the City Councilmen of DELRAT BEACH support tlle month of September. 1991 as Sickle Cell Month in Palm Beach County. Signed tllis day of . 1991 NAME TITLE ORGANIZATION. M E M 0 RAN DUM - TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER//-': SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 7? A - REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 APPROVAL OF STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS - INDEMNIFICATION PROVISIONS DATE: AUGUST 8, 1991 Attached as backup material for this item is the proposed Standard General Conditions for Construction. This will serve as the "boiler plate" for all City construction project contracts. Also attached is the consulting contract indemnification section, which includes the duty to defend and pay attorney's fees at trial and appellate levels. As previously discussed with the Commission, this section has been claimed by some consultants and their insurers to be uninsurable. The City Attorney's office is of the opinion that the defend and attorney's fees provisions are the "heart" of the indemnification provision and, therefore, should be maintained in the contracts. Recommend approval of the Standard General Conditions for Construction documents and the indemnification provision for consultant contracts as recommended by the City Attorney. ~ 6'tLL ~ '6/13/91 --- i5G 'is/Ill /91 Iojh-Q/J ~ - }o ~ - ~ M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGERI~11 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # <8'B - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES/PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT DATE: AUGUST 8, 1991 At your July 23rd regular meeting the Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Statement of Objectives and Use of Funds for Fiscal Year 1991/92 Community Development Block Grant fund- ing. This item is before you to accept the final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds and to authorize staff to forward a grant application to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for funding consideration. Recommend approval of the Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for Fiscal Year 1991/92 Community Develop- ment Block Grant funding and direct staff to forward a grant application to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for funding consideration. I M E M 0 RAN DUM August 1, 1991 . TO: David Harden, city Manager ~ FROM: Dorothy Ellington, Community Development Coordinator ~ ~ THRU: Lula Butler, Director, community Improvemen~ SUBJECT: Agenda Request/Final Statement, 1991-92 Community Development Block Grant ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION In accordance with local policy and procedures the attached Final Statement Of Obiectives and Proiected Use of Funds is being presented for The City commission Consent Agenda, August 13 1991. This is to request approval to submit this proposal to the Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) for FY1991-92 funding. BACKGROUND In accordance with 24 CFR 570.301(b) (2) of the Community Development Block Grant regulations a Public Hearing was held at the Commission Meeting of July 23, 1991. There was no opposition to this proposal voiced at that time and the projected use of funds was approved. RECOMMENDATION staff recommends approval to submit the Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds to HUD. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FISCAL YEAR 1991-1992 INTRODUCTION The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) was established by Congress with the Housing and community Development Act of 1974 to provide local governments and residents with funds needed to work in a comprehensive manner towards the improvement of low and moderate income neighborhoods by providing for capital improve- ments that would adequately upgrade public facilities and ameni- ties, provide for the upgrading of housing, including stimulation of new housing opportunities; economic development activities, public services, historic preservation; reduce conditions which adversely affect the health and safety of community residents and providing for other community development needs having a particu- lar urgency. Each CDBG activity must address one of the three national objec- tives which are as follows: 1) Activities benefiting low and moderate income persons. 2 ) Activities which aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight. 3} Activities designed to meet the community development needs having a particular urgency. Since the beginning of the CDBG Program (Fiscal year 85-86), the City of Delray Beach's allocation has totaled $2,794,000. All of the funds are spent to improve the area designated as the "CDBG Target Area", which was selected on the basis of the condition of the housing and pUblic improvements, as well as the percentage of low and moderate income residents. FISCAL YEAR 1991 PLAN GOALS The City of Delray Beach has as its overall goal to improve housing opportunities and existing housing stock for the low and moderate income residents, provide for the elimination of blight- ed conditions that currently exist in the established CDBG target area, to focus the emphasis of the Delray Beach Community Devel- opment Block Grant Program on the needs of low and moderate income residents at the neighborhood and metropolitan level. OBJECTIVES The city of Delray Beach has as its basic and continuing objec- tives for Community Development: 1) To improve deteriorated housing units, to develop new housing opportunities and the removal of unfit housing. 2} Reduce conditions which adversely affect the health and safety of community residents, including prevention, mitiga- tion and elimination of fire hazards, unsanitary conditions, hazardous conditions and public nuisance. 3} Preserve community resources and character, including protection of natural resources and the preservation of neighborhoods. 4) Continue to provide comprehensive planning to guide communi- ty growth, including land use planning, capital improvement planning, new housing opportunity planning, and provisions for economic development. The city of Delray Beach's entitlement allocation for the period of October 1, 1991 to September 30, 1992 is $428,000. Included in this allocation is $4,000 from recaptured Urban Development Action Grant funds awarded to the city during Fiscal Year 1990-91. Additionally, the City'S Community Development Division, through participation in the Community Redevelopment Agency's loan subsidy program, anticipates approximately $4,000 in program income. Therefore the total budget for FY1991-92 is $491,000. The City of Delray Beach has determined that the primary needs and objectives for community development are: 1) The improvement of housing opportunities conditions through, housing rehabilitation, clearance of unfit housing, planning for housing needs and development of land to encourage new housing opportunities, primarily for low to moderate income families. Development of vacant lots to encourage and provide for infill housing within the established CDBG target area, and the funding of one full-time position to preserve quality of Title xx Day Care currently available to very low income residents in our CD target area. 2 ) Preservation of the neighborhoods, through the prevention of and the elimination of slums and blighted conditions. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Proposed Use of Funds Fiscal Year 1990-1991 Proqram Activitv Amount 1. Housing Rehabilitation $260,218 1991 Allocation $252,000 1990 Allocation 4,000 Anticipated program Income 4,000 Provide for approximately 12 housing units to be brought up to standard conditions. Census Tracts 67,68,65.02 Federal Highway, Linton Blvd.,I-95 & Lake Ida Road. 100 % Low/Moderate Benefit. 2 . Emergency Repair 15,000 Provide for emergency repair to 5 owner-occupied units within the CD Target Area. (plumbing, electric, roof,etc.) Census Tracts 67, 68, 65.02 100% Low/Moderate benefit. 3 . Demolition/Clearance 7,000 Provide for the demolition of approximately 3 vacant, dilapidated, condemned structures and the clearance of the property. Census Tracts 67, 68 & 65.02. Elimination of Slum & Blight. 4. Title XX Child Care 20,782 Provide for the funding of one full-time staff position for Title IVA eligible Child Care Facility. Census Tract 67 100% Low/Moderate Benefit. 5. Recreation Improvement 12,000 Provide for upgrading the irrigation system for parks and ball fields at Pompey Park Census Tract 67 61% Low/Moderate Benefit 6 . program Administration & 91,581 Management 7 . Public Facilities 50,000 Provides for construction of 1890 linear feet of new sidewalks Census Tract 67 68% Low/Mod Area Benefit 8 . Public Facilities 28,000 Aid To Victims of Domestic Assault, Inc. Provides for addition of administrative office space at site Census Tract 68.01 100% Low/Mod Benefit (Limited Clientele) 9 . contingency 6.419 Total Allocation $491,000 RESIDENTIAL ANTIDISPLACEMENT AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PLAN The City of Delray Beach will replace all occupied and vacant occupiable low/moderate-income dwelling units demolished or converted to a use other than as low/moderate-income housing as a direct result of activities assisted with funds provided under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, as described in 24 CFR 570.606(b)(1}. All replacement housing will be provided wi thin three years of the commencement of the demolition or rehabilitation relating to conversion. Before obligating or expending funds that will directly result in such demolition or conversion, the City of Delray Beach will make public and submit to the HUD Field Office the following information in writing: 1. A description of the proposed assisted activity; 2 . The general location on a map and approximate number of dwelling units by size (numb~r of bedrooms) that will be demolished or converted to a use other than as low/moderate-income dwelling units as a direct result of the assisted activity; 3. A time schedule for the commencement and completion of the demolition or conversion; 4. The general location on a map and approximate number of dwelling units by size (number of bedrooms) that will be provided as replacement dwelling units; 5. The source of funding and a time schedule for the provision of replacement dwelling units; and 6. The basis for concluding that each replacement dwelling unit 'will remain a low/moderate-income dwelling unit for at least 10 years from the date of initial occupancy. The city of Delray Beach will provide relocation assistance, as described in 570.606(b)(2), to each low/moderate-income household displaced by the demolition of housing or by the conversion of a low/moderate-income dwelling to another use as a direct result of assisted activities. Consistent with the goals and obj ecti ves of activities assisted under the Act I the City of Delray Beach will take the following steps to minimize the displacement of persons from their homes: 1. Acquisition or demolition activities will be limited to vacant, condemned or dilapidated structures, that have been determined unsafe or contribute to blight. 2. It is not anticipated that any displacement of persons will occur as a result of this program. However, if displacement does occur as a direct result of property acquisition for program improvements, tenants and homeowners who are dis- placed will receive those benefits provided for under the Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970, as amended. Every effort will be made to allow displaces to locate in the neighborhood from which they were displaced, if that is their request. Temporary relocations will be processed in accordance with the city of Delray Beach optional Relocation policy. Agenda Item No.: AGENDA REQUEST Date: AUGUST 1, 1991 Request to be / ") A Agenda Special Agenda AUGUST 13, 1991 Workshop Agenda When: Description of item (who, what, where, how much): FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FISCAL YEAR 1991-1992. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ENTITLEMENT $491,000.00 - (1991 ALLOCATION - $483.000.00: 1990 ALLOCATION - $4.000.00: AND ANTICIPATED PROGRAM INCOME - $4.000.00) (Example: Request from Atlantic High School for $2,000 to fund project graduation). ORDINANCEj RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YE~ Draft Attached: YES/NO Recommendation: (Example: Recommend approval with funding from Special Events Account No. 001-3333-555-44.55). ~ J Department Head Signature '. ~"'" - ---."" City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): Funding available: YES/ NO I Funding alternatives: (if applicable) Account No. & Description: Account Balance: City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: f!iy NO Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: ~ Received: Placed on Agenda: Action: Approved/Disapproved ," . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER6~ SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~c." - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT GRANT APPLICATION/RECYCLING PROGRAM DATE: August 7, 1991 This item is before you to authorize staff to submit a grant application in the amount of $57,913 to the Department of Environmental Regulation/Solid Waste Authority to fund "Year Four" of our recycling program. The grant funding will be used for promotional events, education, and program expansion. The projected budget for the recycling program is $67,979. This amount includes public information costs and salary, wage s , benefits, and incidentals for a full time Recycling Coordinator position. While staff has been instructed to request the same level of funding as received last year, it is very likely that we will receive an additional allocation. "Year Four" expansion includes establishing a recycling program for multi-unit residential buildings, establishing a commercial recycling program, continuation of the use and purchase of recycled materials within our organization, and continuation of the office paper recycling program. Recommend approval of request for authorization to submit a grant application in the amount of $57,913 to the Department of Environmental Regulation/Solid Waste Authority to fund "Year Four" of our recycling program. ~~ - ~ ~ m~ ~ fafJGlUj b.uxd~ <;f /14/9/ /;0' /fU-~ ~ '''' 0.1l MEMORANDUM TO: DAVID HARDEN - CITY MANAGER FROM: LULA BUTLER - DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT SUBJECT: CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL SUBMIT -YEAR FOUR- RECYCLING AND EDUCATION GARNT APPLICATION DATE: AUGUST 6, 1991 ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION: - - The approval of and authorization to submit year four (4) Recycling and Education Grant application from the DER/SWA Recycling Program in the amount of $57,913. BACKGROUND: For FY 90-91 the City received a grant of $57,913 from the DER/ SWA Recycling Program. The objective of this five-year program is to recycle at least 30% of Florida's waste stream by 1994, as mandated by the State. The City of Delray Beach is utilizing these grant funds for promotion, education and program expansion. In addition to our curbside program, which collects an average of 476,000 pounds of recyclable per month, we collect a monthly average of 216.6 tons of materials from our efforts with multi-family dwellings, community drop-off sites and office paper containers. In FY 91-92 our efforts will be expanded in all areas to include 10,000 dwelling units in multi-family buildings being phased into a co-mingled recyclables and newspaper program. Additional efforts will also be made in the commercial and yard waste areas. Staff is seeking City Commission approval to submit our "Year Four" application for funding to the SWA. The submission deadline is August 31, 1991. We have been instructed to request the same level of funding as received last year which is $57,913; however, it is our understanding that we may very well receive an additional allocation. Application materials are being prepared by Richard Bauer, Code Enforcement Administrator and Doug Randolph, Grants/Training Coordinator. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend City Commission approval of the grant proposal developed by staff and authorization for staff to submit the same pursuant to terms specified by DER/SWA. LB:DQ DlO RECGRANT.CC "," I." Agenda Item No.: AGENDA REQUEST Date: August 5, 1991 Request to be placed on: X Regular Agenda Consent Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: August 13. 1991 Description of item (who, what, where, how much): RpqIlP!'lt- r.;t-y r.mmn;!'l!'l;nn approval to submit "Year Four" Recycling and Education Grant Application. (Example: Request from Atlantic High School for $2,000 to fund project graduation). ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES@ Draft Attached: YES/NO Recommendation: Approval to submit (Example: Recommend approval with funding from Special Events Account No. 001-3333-555-44.55). ~/~ Department Head Signature: ---=- City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): N/A , Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): N/A Funding available: YES/ NO Funding alternatives: (if applicable) Account No. & Description: Account Balance: City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: @4 NO {/vI Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: ~. Placed on Agenda: Action: Approved/Disapproved ~ MEMORANDUM TO: DAVID HARDEN - CITY MANAGER FROM: LOLA BUTLER - DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT SUBJECT: CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL SUBMIT -YEAR FOUR- RECYCLING AND EDUCATION GARNT APPLICATION DATE: AUGUST 6, 1991 ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION: - - The approval of and authorization to submit year four (4) Recycling and Education Grant application from the DER/SWA Recycling Program in the amount of $57,913. BACKGROUND: For FY 90-91 the City received a grant of $57,913 from the DER/SWA Recycling Program. The objective of this five-year program is to recycle at least 30% of Florida's waste stream by 1994, as mandated by the State. The City of Delray Beach is utilizing these grant funds for promotion, education and program expansion. In addition to our curbside program, which collects an average of 476,000 pounds of recyclable per month, we collect a monthly average of 216.6 tons of materials from our efforts with multi-family dwellings, community drop-off sites and office paper containers. In FY 91-92 our efforts will be expanded in all areas to include 10,000 dwelling units in multi-family buildings being phased into a co-mingled recyclables and newspaper program. Additional efforts will also be made in the commercial and yard waste areas. Staff is seeking City Commission approval to submit our "Year Four" application for funding to the SWA. The submission deadline is August 31, 1991. We have been instructed to request the same level of funding as received last year which is $57,913; however, it is our understanding that we may very well receive an additional allocation. Application materials are. being prepared by Richard Bauer, Code Enforcement Administrator and Doug Randolph, Grants/Training Coordinator. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend City Commission approval of the grant proposal developed by staff and authorization for staff to submit the same pursuant to terms specified by DER/SWA. LB:DQ D10 RECGRANT.CC .,111 For Year Four, we will concentrate our efforts in the following areas: - A. Approximately 10,000 dwelling units in multi-family buildings will be phased into a glass, plastic, aluminum and newspaper recycling program. B. Commercial recycling will commence on a voluntary basis. C. City government use of recycled products will continue. D. City government office paper and co-mingled recycling will continue. E. The educat.ional component will be continued and expanded. F. Certain yard and garden waste will be recycled into usable landscape mulch. v. OPERATIONAL STRATEGY Year Four expansion includes: A. Multi-Family Unit Buildings Our contract with Waste Management was recently amended to include establishing recycling programs for multi-unit residential buildings for co-mingled glass, plastic and aluminum and newspaper. We will work toward the implementation of the aforementioned program in Year Four. This will involve approximately 10,000 individual dwelling units. B. Commercial Recycling This program will provide education, promotion, collection and disposal services to participating office complexes, restaurants, taverns and retail stores located in Delray Beach. A recent contract amendment between the City and Waste Management authorizes Waste Management to establish a a voluntary recycling program to include corrugated cardboard, mixed office paper and aluminum, glass and plastic containers. C. City Government Use of Recycled Products Local government can lead the way in this area by utilizing recycled products. In Year Four, we will continue to encourage the City of Delray Beach to use recycled paper products. In addition, we will work with the City's Purchasing Department to consider purchasing products that are manufactured with recycled materials (e.g. , park benches, paving material, trash containers, parking lot bumpers, etc.). D. Office Paper Recycling Program The City has implemented a program for the collection of high grade office paper, envelopes and copier paper. Separate containers are also provided for computer paper, newspaper and aluminum cans. The aforementioned efforts are in place at all governmental buildings and will be continued and encouraged in Year Four. 2 ~, III '" VII. MATERIALS RECOVERY ESTIMATES AND DISPOSITION - The Delray Beach residential recycling program consists of two entities-- curbside and multi-family. At present, a monthly average of approximately 476,000 pounds of co-mingled plastic, glass, aluminum and newspaper are collected from approximately 15,800 homes participating in the curbside program. A monthly' average of approximately 216.6 tons of paper materials and other recyclables are being collected from multi-unit dwellings, a Community drop-off facility, and office paper containers at governmental buildings. These recyclables are collected by Waste Management of Palm Beach and transported to the Solid Waste Authority's Delray Beach transfer station for processing (except for office paper). During 1991-1992, our program is being expanded to include co-mingled recyclables and newspaper at all multi-unit residential buildings. This will bring recycling services to approximately 10,000 additional individual dwelling units. We expect monthly volumes of recycled materials to increase considerably as the multi-family program is implemented during Year Four. Additional recyclable materials will be collected from those commercial firms which choose to participate in the voluntary commercial recycling program - and through recycling certain yard and garden wastes. VIII.PROJECT BUDGET The City of Delray Beach maintains a contractual agreement with Waste Management to do curbside, multi-family and commercial pickups and hauling. We will utilize the grant funds for continued expansion, coordination, pub lic information and education of recycling programs. You will note from the accompanying figures that the projected budget expenditures are more than the anticipated grant funding. ($67,979 projected budget versus the Year Three grant amount of $57,913.37). This is another example of the City's commitment to the recycling effort. A. Public Information Amount Public Information (Pamphlets, Flyers, Media)............ $10,650 Total Public Information ................................ $10,650 B. Salaries, Wages, Etc. Amount Salaries and Wages (Recycling Coordinator)............... $34,501 FICA/Health/Life/Disability, etc. .......... ...... ... .... 7~419 Total Salaries, Wages, Etc. ................... .......... $41,920 4 ~ III ,,, XI. CONCLUSION- We are pleased with the response to and cooperation with our efforts to date. Much work needs to be accomplished. We feel that our plans for Year Fo~r are ambitious but realistic and necessary to attain the type of public acceptance required to be truly successful in this effort. For us to obta~n the expected results, we need our full share (and more, if possible) of the prorated funds from the Educational and Recycling Grant Program. This would equate to at least the amount obtained for Year Three, $57,913.37. 6 f,,1I YEAR FOUR RECYCLING AND EDUCATIONAL GRANT APPLICATION CITY OF DELRAY BEACH I. PROGRAM TITLE "Delray Beach Recycles" II. PROGRAM SPONSOR' City of Delray Beach III. PROGRAM CONTACT Richard Bauer Code Enforcement Administrator City of Delray Beach 100 N. W. First Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 (407) 243-7214 IV. PROGRAM OVERVIEW We are extremely pleased with the results of our efforts to date and are looking forward to continued acceptance, cooperation and expansion in the future. Delray Beach's pilot curbside recycling program started in April, 1989 with recycling containers provided to 800 single-family homes. In October, 1989, the program was expanded to include approximately 15,800 single-family homes. Currently, all single-family homes in Delray Beach are included in the recycling program for glass, plastic, aluminum, and newspaper. Approximately 4,559 dwelling units in multi-family buildings are involved in a newspaper recycling program. In addition, the City established a community recycling drop-off program at City Hall for mixed recyclables, newspaper and corrugated cardboard and a governmental office paper recycling program. Here are some key statistics to show the status of the City's programs: - For the period August, 1990 through June, 1991, a monthly average of 44.4% of single family homes participated in the curbside program. During the above period, an average of 476,000 pounds per month of recyclables was collected at curbside. - For the period February, 1991 through June, 1991, a monthly average of 216.6 tons of recyclable materials was collected from multi- family, community and office paper containers. In April, 1990, a full time Recycling Coordinator was hired by the City of Delray Beach. The aforementioned coordinator left the City's employ in May, 1991 to assume a similar position at St. Lucie County. While we are recruiting to fill the vacant position, the City's Code Enforcement Administrator is managing the recycling program. 1 E. Yard and Garden Waste . The City's contract hauler, Waste Management, has begun to recycle yard and garden waste into landscape mulch. In May and June, 1991 over 655 tons of yard and garden waste was mulched by Waste Management. This program will be monitored and expanded during Year Four. During Year Four, we expect to again have a full time Recycling Coordinator whose principal duties will be to ensure the continued success of existing programs, to monitor and participate in the implementation of the multi-family program, to coordinate activities with our contract hauler and to perform civic, educational and public relations tasks aimed at increasing the awareness of and participation in recycling programs. VI. EDUCATIONAL STRATEGY Education is the key to the future of recycling. Only by increasing public awareness and developing good recycling habits will we be able to achieve our goals. While we have had good success to date in this area, education will continue to be a major focus of our program. Education can" be divided into two main components--the development of new habits and the breaking of old ones. The development of new habits can often best be achieved with our children. Children who are exposed to and learn about the benefits of recycling develop positive attitudes and recycling becomes a part of normal life. A secondary benefit comes from the child encouraging other family members to recycle. In the past, three Delray Beach elementary schools were selected to participate in the "cash for cans" recycling effort. Our Recycling Coordinator will expand efforts to reach more children by sending announcements to educators for all grade levels to inform them of recycling education services that can be provided. Breaking old habits is also necessary for the future well-being of the recycling effort. In Year Four of our program, we intend to continue to increase our exposure to citizen, merchant and civic groups of Delray Beach. Our plans include having an information booth at community events. In addition to business and civic groups, promotional presentations and materials will be made available to various apartment and condominium' complexes to rally support and to increase participation in our new multi-family recycling program. We have not forgotten those who continue to participate in our curbside program. Quarterly recycling updates and periodic flyers featuring consumer tips and recycling news will be distributed to these participants. We fully expect that our educational efforts will reach virtually all residents of Delray Beach through personal visits or mailings. 3 ~, III C. Operating Expense Amount Other Professional Services ...... ........ ........... .... $ 1,100 Trc:ivel and Training ..................................... 3,100 Postage .............. ............ ........ ............... 6,032 Operating Supplies . .............. ..... ... ............... 1,500 Memberships/Publications ... ...... ..... ... ............... 483 Film Supplies/Processing ........... ... ... ..... ..... ..... 500 Rental of Equipment ..... ......... ........ ........... .... 1,428 Gas/Oil/Lubricants/Repairs . ...... ....................... 1,266 Total Operating Expense ................................. $15,409 TOTAL PROJECTED BUDGET FOR YEAR FOUR .................... $67)979 Since we are greatly expanding our recycling programs in 1991-1992. any additional grant funds that could be provided to us would be most welcome. We would use additional monies for the enhancement, improvement and monitoring of our efforts. We believe we have one of the best, most progressive recycling efforts in the State of Florida and we continue to explore avenues to reduce materials sent to the landfill. IX. RELATED ORDINANCES OR CONTRACTS Enclosed please find a certified true and correct copy of the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Delray Beach and the Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County. This Agreement was entered into on May 17, 1989 and remains in effect for the full duration of the Department of Environmental Regulation's Solid Waste Grant Program. Also enclosed is a certified true and correct copy of City of Delray Beach Ordinance Number 54-89 which established single family curb side recycling. Ordinance Number 48-91 which established commercial and multi-family recycling, and a copy of our contract with Waste Management. It should also be noted that in August, 1991, the City of Delray Beach City Commission authorized the submission of the Year Four grant application for funding to allow for the continued promotion, maintenance and expansion of the City's recycling and educational programs. X. EVALUATIVE PROGRAM A major focus of our 1991-1992 recycling program will be public education. Several mass mailings will reinforce the recycling message. This type of educational effort coupled with other public relations components is expected to increase the level of participation. In addition. the Recycling Coordinator will conduct quarterly field surveys to ascertain the quality of services provided to the community. Major program enhancements and modifications will be made in 1991-1992 to include multi-family recycling and the implementation of voluntary commercial recycling, all designed to move us toward our 30% recycling goal. 5 1';"\ . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY HANAGER {ilv'l SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # <g 0 - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 INCREASE IN HEALTH AND DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUMS DATE: August 7 , 1991 This item is before you to approve an increase in the premiums for health and dental coverage for employees and their dependents. Our claims administrator, Anthem Life Insurance Company, has projected our health claim costs for next year. Based on these projections, rate increases are proposed. The City's contribution for employees will be increased by $13.24 from $159.59 to 172.83 per employee, per month. The cost for dependent coverage will be increased by $33.07 from $214.43 to $247.50. These rate breakdowns are based upon the actual claims of employees versus dependents. The Commission may transfer charges from dependent to employee to equalize the increase, if so desired. While the City does not share in the expense of the dental insurance coverage, we are responsible for establishing the rate. Accordingly, a rate increase is proposed in order to meet next years projected costs. The proposal is to increase the current rate for employees by .69C from $14.80 to 15.39 and the dependent rate by .43C - $1.07, from $10.76 - $26.60 to $11.19 - $27.67 depending on the number of dependents insured. A survey of the premiums paid by the surrounding municipalities is attached in the back up material for your information. In addition, staff is recommending that the deduction schedule for City employees-married to-City employees be extended to 26 weeks. Recommend approval of an increase in the premiums for health coverage for employees and their dependents from $159.59 to 172.83 and $214.43 to $247.50 respectively, approve an increase in the premiums for dental coverage for employees and their dependents from $14.80 to 15.39 and from $10.76 - $26.60 to $11.19 - $27.67. David T. Harden, City Manager March 14, 1991 Page Three OTHER INFORMATION AFFECTING RATES: Claims Employee Dependent Total 1986 $ 384,225 $259,083 $ 643,308 1987 366,800 339,863 706,663 1988 717,706 263,597 981,303 1989 908,428 498,362 1,397,791 1990 (01/01/90-12/31/90) 1,036,774 528,233 1,565,007 Budgeted 1991 1,113,000 547,510 1,660,510 Actual Units 06/30/90 664 228 Claims per unit per year 1,676 2,401 Claims per unit per month $139.67 $200.08 NUMBER OF UNITS ENROLLED (March 7, 1991): Employees per retirees per COBRA = 684 Dependents = 209 CALCULATION OF RATES PER MONTH: Employee Dependent A. Prior year claims per unit per month $139.67 $200.08 B. Projected increase in claims rate 1. 10% 1. 10% C. Projected claims per unit per month $153.63 $220.00 D. Fee surcharge (12.5%) 19.20 27.50 E. Total cost per unit per month $172.83 $247.50 Fee Surcharge: 684 employee units x $27.69/mo. x 12 mos. = $ 227,280 = 12.44% = 12.5%* Projection of Claims $1,826.561 REVENUE/EXPENSE PROOF Revenue Projection: 684 employee units x $172.83 x 12 = $1,418,589 209 dependent units x $247.50 x 12 = 620,730 Total Revenue $2,039,319* .'" // David T. Harden, City Manager March 14, 1991 , Page Four Expense Projection: Projected claims per unit per year Employee = $1,676 x 1.10% x 684 units = $1,261,024 Dependents = $2,401 x 1.10% x 209 units = 551,990 $1,813,014 Other Fees (12.5%) = 226,627 Total Costs $2,039,641* *Rounding To summarize this seemingly endless array of numbers, we simply need to compare current rates to the proposed rates for employees and dependents. Employee Dependent 1990-91 rates per month $159.59 $214.43 1991-92 rates per month $172.83 $247.50 Percent Increase 8.3% 15.4% NOTE: These rate breakdowns are based upon the actual claims of employees vs. dependents. The City may transfer charges from dependent to employee to equalize the percentage increase if this be their desire. A comparison of our rates with surrounding municipalities is presented as follows: Employee Dependent Pompano Beach $204.00 $262.00 Boca Raton $172.16 $270.66 Boynton Beach $200.36 $235.34 Deerfield Beach $146.18 $257.58 Lake Worth $126.04 $232.30 West Palm Beach $159.87 $287.38 Delray Beach (present) $159.59 $214.43 Delray Beach (proposed) $172.83 $247.50 We would recommend that these rates be put into place on October 1, 1991 since the last premium adjustment was made on this date last year. The City must be willing to address any budget shortfall until this date due to these rate changes. JMS/slh cc: Lee Graham, Risk Management Officer Marty Ritchason, Director of Human Resources f.'1I . CITY OF DELRAY BEACH PROPOSED HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 Monthly Monthly Single Dependent Rate Rate Employee $172.83 $247.50 Retiree $172.83 $247.50 COBRA $176.29 $252.45 Following is a survey conducted by the Risk Management Office on August 2. 1991 comparing our current and proposed rates to surrounding municipalities: HEALTH INSURANCE RATE SURVEY Monthly Monthly City Surveyed Employee Rate Dependent Rate Pompano Beach $204.00 $262.00 Boca Raton $125.00 $260.00 Boynton Beach $200.36 $235.34 Deerfield Beach $146.17 $257.58 Lake Worth $147.17 $261. 26 West Palm Beach $159.87 $287.38 Delray Beach (Current) $159.59 $214.43 Delray Beach (Proposed) $172.83 $247.50 . . CITY OF DELRAY BEACH PROPOSED DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 Monthly Monthly Single Dependent Rate Rate Employee $ 15.39 $11.19-$27.67* Following is a survey conducted by the Risk Management Office on August 2, 1991 comparing our current and proposed rates to surrounding municipalities: DENTAL INSURANCE RATE SURVEY Monthly Monthly City Surveyed Employee Rate Dependent Rate Pompano Beach none none Boca Raton none none Boynton Beach $ 14.18 $ 25.44 Deerfield Beach $ 14.95 $ 37.98 Lake Worth $ 9.95 $ 23.70 West Palm Beach $ 9.90 $ 24.00 Delray Beach (Current) $ 14.80 $10.76-$26.60* Delray Beach (Proposed) $ 15.39 $11.19-$27.67* *This range represents monthly rates for one dependent through three or more dependents. ,. <I~ - ::~~Lee ~~ Agenda Item No. : AGENDA REQUEST Date: 08-05-91 Request to be placed on:' X Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: 08-13-91 Description of agenda iteM (who, what, where, how much): Approval of the followin to be effective 10-01-91 for fiscal ear 1991-92: 1 Increase in ealth insurance and denta premiums per attac e sc 2) Modify the current dependent health insurance deduction for employees-married-to-employee~ from a 24-week basis to a 26-week basis. ORDIHABCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YESt€) Draft Attached: YES..€) Recommendation: Risk Management Officer, Finance Director and City Manager recommend approval. Department Head Signature: Deter.ination of Consistency Comprehensive City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): JJ../A Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): Funding available: YES/ NO Funding alternatives: (if applicable) Account No. & Description: Account Balance: City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: (Y/ NO 1M Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: J' Received: ':.- f i ~I . Action: Appr ed/Disapproved "'11 . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER (/vi SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 1?S - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 RATIFICATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD OPERATING BUDGET DATE: August 7 , 1991 The South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board (SCRWTD) at its July 18th meeting approved their operating budget for fiscal year 1991-92 in the amount of $3,210,000. This amount represents a decrease of $2,099 from last years budget. The most significant changes over last years budget include a decrease in the Personnel Services budget of $141,099 and an increase in the Operating budget of $314,000. A detailed budget document is available for review in the City Manager's Office. Recommend ratification of the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board's operating budget for fiscal year 1991-92. ~; 5'/l<Il'I . ~ ff9/-- /~5 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD . 1801 North Congress Avenue · Delray Beach, Florida 33445 Telephone ROBERT J. HAGEL 272.7061 734.2577 Ezecutiue Director Fax: (407) 265-2357 TO: ALL BOARD MEMBERS FROM: ROBERT J. HAGEL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE: JULY 9, 1991 RE: 1991/1992 BUDGET 1. It is ant.icipat.ed that. flows will increase from liJ.,800,000 gallons per day for t.his budget year t.o 15,000,000 gallons per day in 1991/1992. "') The 1991/1992 operational budget is $3,210,000 as compared ... . to $3,212,099 for last years budget. 3 . Due to consolidating work assignments plus cont.ract.ing for ac1minist.rat.ion building cleaning and lawn maintenance we are able t.O eliminate t.wo mid management positions ( Chief of Operations and Chief of Maintenance) plus four additional positions which, reduces our staff from 30 to 2iJ.. (Organization chart enclosed) iJ. . The impact of the aeration basin/pump station expansion on the budget is as follows: Insurance $8,000 Permits $2,000 Chemicals $28,500 Fuel $iJ.,OOO Elect.r ici ty $80,000 TOTAL $122,500 5. We have increased the gr it. haul ing amount. by $10,000. This will allow us to de'-Iater and remove, with our present hauler, the grit from the cities sewer cleaning equipment. PAGE 2 ~ 6. Line 160 (Incent.ive program) has been added t.o t.his years budget. in t.he amount. of $5,000 to encourage cost saving suggest.ions from employees. 7. We have budget.ed $50,000 for administ.rat.ion building cleaning and lawn maintenance. Wi t.h t.he plant.ing of new veget.at.ion included in t.he const.ruct.ion cont.ract. for t.he aeration basin ptmlp st_at.ion expansion project., t.he lawn maint.enance will increase subst.antiall y over previous years. 8 . Al t.hough t.he new diffusers will offset. t.he elect.rical cost. ()f the mechanical aerator for the aeration basin/effluent plmlp station expansion, an additional $80,000 has been budgeted to provide power for t.he aerat.ion basin scrubber system and the effluent ptmlps. 9 . An adcli t.ional $35,000 has been budgeted for electricity in anticipation of a rat.e increase from Florida Power and Light. Company. 10. Sludge hauling cont.inues t.o have a major impact on our budget. . We are presently investigating the possibility of inst.all ing a belt. press t.o dewater our sludge. Al t.hough t.he original inst.allation for the press will be expensive, t.here could be a $250,000 reduction in sludge hauling and an addi t.ional reduct.ion of $~5,000 in electricity usage per year. We will provide more det.ailed information t.o t.he board on t.his matter in t.he next. few mont.hs. 1I. The budget. for Engineering Services has been reduced by $175,000 from last years budget. This is due t.o t.he fact. that t.he Biotoxicity Engineering which was budgeted In the previous year was not spent. We are uncert.ain ,.,hat. t.he fut.ure requirements of FDER and EPA will be regarding this mat.t.er. Therefore, we feel t.hat the cost. associated wi t.h this study can be delayed until a later date. 12. The Capital Assets Budget requested for 1991/1992 is $39,862.00 If you have any questions please advise. RH/bw CC: D. Harden 'S. Miller R. Federspiel J. Guidry B. Greenwood Haaz & Diaz ..--.-._- "---~--- Cfi(H;: r ur iJFU(iN I '::("11: U:,! '3UU n.1 1::LNrn(\L.. I~EIj J. Di'.lf~L l"(\~lTEVl(.Y1TT\: TF\:E:JYrr'1ENT (:'jND D I ~:iF'r:J<:;(lL [.Jf.)AFD r : J~:;" Y---~~Jf1 r'1-~~;:;;'~-;';,::i~~~-~-~~, r'1E r~-;;~~:';~;] -- -... .-.. .... -. -... --. -.. .... .- --. ... -- -.. ..... -- ....:> r~E f3~;~~--~-;-I:~ S;~~~-A N~ L... ............-...-... ...........-.......-......-........................-..-....-.r--..-..--.-..........--..............-.-.---.....---. -------------.-..... ~~-~:..r.~_.~~~:__._(.~~.~"_...J__.___ DE~~~\{-.~._~~_~_..__ r-~~.:.~-;~.~....;:..;:~:.-i:.;:;;;~.-..~;-~..;~:~:~;~~~~.~;;~;. ..... ..." .--....... ........ ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..- .... -.. -. ..'- f~~~~;~~~~~~~~:-~~:~~....-:_I l t AUDITORS I .. . . -r::,",,"r f:,.....-...-.-.T..-........~.~-.~~~_.-:.. .. ",.~ . r .___~=~:~~~.!.:~~~=1::~:2.._.......J I L,J,I\!..,(,;I_ I AU/'II ,.1 I "'::1 11\1"11 I ..IN J;=::=-r:::-=---=::=l------~-T==---==:J- 'I GENmf4L F H;c"L f4Dt"lI N I STHf4TI VE J SUPl ASSISTANT. l---.-----r.........-.---.--.-J '=C---' J I I r_::::~~~J ~LERI~::~~] F'PETfl:T I I L.PID OF'H I V OP[:;': J. V j OPF I I,) 110FT, 11/ I I n) 'f)FP ~:ci JI'I.I ILL ! _J - .. J I.J.. I . J l I --.-.._ --.--___..._ ...__.._..___.____ ..._.__...___ ._____ _ __ t J L___~J r='-~":'::I fJ;R IIV .~-] r;;;~--fi-;l [op,; S] I OF; 11:/ I 1 II H I....----..r---......-- ------.-...---.J--....-..- - - l J L.....T~--.j-----===--:::~.:-~-~ =~I:=::~ ._-=r-'- .........\ [ OF'" I I] [ope; I I J Ii'. r~ ;;,.! ____......_.__..______........._..__ ....._._..__._._._...._..... 1......................_.___.1 ~=~~~~~~~J-- ---'.-' -'-;"R-~ f1A I;n l SPEC _._0.__._.._.__.._ r~-~~---~'~-'l -ELE.:CTn I C I AN. "M___.__._____..._.__ "_.__ e~:~:~']- -tA~:T~ w::] 7/9/91 ".'1 Page 1 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL HASTEWATER TREATMENT & DISPOSAL BOARD 1989-90 1990-91 1990-91 1991-92 DESCRIPTION ACTUAl. BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET SUMMARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,114,821 1,231,099 1,217,050 1,090,000 OPERATIONAL EXPENSES: 1,595,881 1,661,000 1,763,000 1,975,000 SERVICE CONTRACTS OPERATIONS/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES & CHEMICALS SUB TOTAL - PERSONNEl. & OPERATIONAL 2,710,702 2,892,099 2,980,050 3,065,000 EXPENSES ENGINEERING 133,807 320,000 125,000 145,000 TOTAL - ALL ACCOUNTS 2,844,509 3,212,099 3,105,050 3,210,000 I Revised 7/09/91 ,._."._.~-~ ~ rf<fJl-/cZ5 Page 2 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEHATER 'l'REA'l'MENT & DISPOSAL BOARD PERSONNEL SERVICES ACCT. 1989/90 1990-91 1990-91 1991-92 NO. DESCRIPTION ~tt hj B 8fieET BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET 120 REGULAR WAGES 832,528 881,549 860,000 755,000 130 HERI'1' SYS'l'EM 0 50,000 50,000 40,000 140 OVER'l'IME 29,638 25,000 33,000 30,000 150 CHRISTMAS BONUSES 2,291 1,550 1,550 0 151 SICK LEAVE REDUCTIONS 2,840 5,000 7,500 3,000 152 PAYROLL CONTINGENCY 1,450 2,500 2,500 2,500 160 INCENTIVE PROGRAM 5,000 210 SOCIAL SECURITY 66,879 74,000 72,000 65,000 CONTRIBUTIONS 21 PENSION (SUN BANK) 73,776 75,000 75,000 75,000 , 230 BC/aS HEALTH INSURANCE 54,852 65,000 70,000 65,000 231 DENTAL INSURANCE 6,240 5,500 6,000 7,000 232 DISABILITY INSURANCE 9,434 8,500 8,500 8,000 233 LIFE INSURANCE 1,198 2,500 2,000 2,000 240 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 25,654 24,750 25,000 23,000 250 UNEMPLOYMENT 7,400 9,250 3,000 8,500 270 EMPLOYEE ASSIST. PROG. 641 1,000 1,000 1,000 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES: 1,114,821 1,231,099 1,217,050 1,090,000 ",'I Page 3 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT & DISPOSAL BOARD ~ OPERATIONAL EXPENSES SERVICE CONTRACTS ACCT. 1989-90 1990-91 1990-91 1991-92 NO. DESCRIP'l'ION ACTUAL BUDGET PROJ EC'l'ED BUDGET 310 MEDICAL SERVICES 620 2,000 2,000 2,000 320 ACCOUNTING/AUDITING 17,336 16,000 18,000 18,000 321 LEGAL (ADMINISTRATION) 27,118 18,000 27,000 25,000 322 TOXICITY LEGAL FEES 37,902 20,000 18,000 20,000 338 PRETREATMENT PROGRAM 14,410 20,000 14,000 15,000 339 TOXICITY TESTING 17,692 25,000 3,000 40,000 340 SLUDGE HAULING 495,622 500,000 550,000 550,000 341 SLUDGE, LIQUID, 2,450 2,000 2,000 2,000 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS 342 IBM COMPU'l'ER 4,428 3,000 3,000 3,500 343 COPIERS included 3,500 4,000 5,000 in # above 344 FLORIDA SERVICE - 3,900 7,500 8,000 8,000 METER CALIBRATION 345 GRIT HAULING 20,185 20,000 20,000 30,000 346 SERVICE CONTINGENCY 4,956 3,500 2,000 3,500 390 CONTRAC'l' \-lORK 25,559 25,000 25,000 25,000 TOTAL SERVICE CONTRACTS 672,178 665,500 696,000 747,000 Page 4 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT & DISPOSAL BOARD . 1\CCT. 1989-90 1990-91 1990-91 1991-92 NO. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET OPERATIONAL EXPENSES OPERATIONS/MAINTENANCE 400 TECHNICAL SESSIONS AND 8,695 8,500 10,000 .12,000 TRAINING 401 AUTOMOTIVE EXPENSES 5,357 7,500 5,000 8,500 410 TELEPHONE EXPENSE 8,283 8,000 10,000 8,500 440 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 790 2,000 1,000 2,000 450 INSURANCE EXPENSE 52,544 70,000 80,000 85,000 460 BUILDINGS 8,041 8,500 12,000 10,000 461 EQUIPHENT - PLANT 65,378 35,000 112,000 60,000 462 VECHICLES - PLANT 6,988 5,000 5,000 5,000 463 GROUNDS UPKEEP/MAINT. 843 5,000 5,000 50,000 j64 REPAIR CONTINGENCY 8,589 25,000 15,000 15,000 (DEFICIENCIES) 490 ADVER'l'ISING 4,365 2,000 2,000 2,000 491 LICENSES, PERMITS 3,545 3,000 3,500 5,000 TOTAL OPERATIONS/MAINTENANCE 173,426 179,500 260,500 263,000 . , .."' Page 5 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT & DISPOSAL BOARD OPERATIONAL.EXPENSES SUPPLIES & CHEMICALS ACCT. 1989-90 1990-91 1990-91 1991-92 NO. DESCRIP'l'ION ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET 510 OFFICE SUPPLIES/ 7,061 8,500 8,500 8,500 CONSUMABLES 515 SAFETY SUPPLIES 15,906 15,000 15,000 10,000 520 UNIFORM EXPENSES 3,358 5,000 5,000 4,000 521 BOARD CONTINGENCY 1,805 1,500 3,000 7,500 522 * CHEMICALS 219,086 242,500 236,000 251,000 * CHEMICAL RECAP: 522.1 POLYMER 70,002 46,000 75,000 70,000 522.2 LIME 51,711 60,000 55,000 56,000 522.3 CHLORINE 79,702 115,000 91,000 85,000 522.5 CHEMICAL CONTINGENCY 17,671 21,500 15,000 40,000 523 GENERAL OP. SUPPLIES 17,680 12,000 16,000 15,000 524 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 7,295 5,000 5,000 5,000 525 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 16,322 20,000 18,000 18,000 526 OIL, LUBRICANTS, 7,061 4,000 5,000 5,000 GREASE, GAS (OPERATIONS) 527 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 1,807 1,000 3,000 3,000 I 528 SMALL TOOLS, EQUIPMENT 5,472 5,000 8,000 5,000 529 OFFICE EQUIP.(<$500) 3,614 2,000 2,000 2,000 530 LAB EQUIPMENT (<$500) 0 2,500 3,000 2,500 Page 6 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTffiqATER TREATMENT & DISPOSAL BOARD - \CCT . 1989-90 1990-91 1990-91 1991-92 NO. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET PROJ Ec'rED BUDGET 531 ELEC'l'RICI 'J'Y 428,473 475,000 460,000 610,000 532 WATER CONSUMPTION 7,011 8,500 9,000 9,500 533 GARBAGE COLLECTION 624 1,000 2,000 1,000 540 MEMBERSHIP, DUES, 2,701 2,500 3,000 3,000 SUBSCRIPTIONS 541 EDUCATIONAL EXPENSES 5,001 5,000 5,000 5,000 TOTAL SUPPLIES & CHEMICALS 750,277 816,000 806,500 965,000 OPERATIONAL EXPENSES I SERVICE CONTRACTS 672,178 665,500 696,000 747,000 OPERATIONS/MAINTENANCE 173,426 179,500 260,500 263,000 SUPPLIES & CHEMICALS 750,277 816,000 806,500 965,000 TOTAL OPERATIONAL EXPENSES 1,595,881 1,661,000 1,763,000 1,975,000 . Page 7 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER & TREATMENT & DISPOSAL BOARD ~ ENGINEERING ACCT. 1989-90 1990-91 1990-91 1991-92 NO. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGE'l' PROJECTED BUDGET GOO ENG. CONTINGENCY 37,043 100,000 110,000 110,000 601 BIOTOXICITY ENG. 96,443 200,000 10,000 15,000 602 PRETREATMENT PROGRAM 321 20,000 5,000 20,000 ENGINEERING TOTAL ENGINEERING 133,807 320,000 125,000 145,000 PERSONNEL SERVICES ACCT. . - 120 REGULAR WAGES Base wages -24 Employees 5 Administrative 4 Lab & Pretreatment 15 Operations & Maintenance 130 MERI'l' SYSTEM Annual performance evaluations based on review criteria. 140 OVER'l'IME Shift coverage as required operationally. Hours worked on a holiday are paid at time and a half. 151 SICK PAY REDUCTIONS Employees have the option to cash out (at 50% payment) all sick days in excess of fifteen (15 ) accrued in sick day bank after second anniversary. 152 PAYROLL CONTINGENCY Employee annual appreciation dinner and luncheons (i.e., Senior Volunteer, retirements, recognition, and safety awards.) 160 INCENTIVE PROGRAM Employee incentives for implemented ideas and suggestions for overall efficiency and operational cost reductions. Policy will be submitted to Board for approval at later date. I . 210 SOCIAL SECURI'l'Y/ Employer's Cost 8% . Currently - MEDICARE Social Security 6.2% Medicare 1.45%. 221 PENSION Defined board contribution on 40 hours base pay for participants. 230 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD Board cost per employee is $225 HEALTH INSURANCE monthly. * Dependent coverage not provided by Board. 231 DENTAL INSURANCE Monthly Board/Employee cost: Family premium $37.85 each Single premium $13.80 each * Premium increase Aug. 1991 232 DISABILITY INSURANCE Long Term Disability Insurance (Equi table I.ife) provided by the Board at approximately 1% of 40 hour base pay per employee. Cost $0.95/$100 compensation. 233 LIFE INSURANCE Board provides $10,000 life insurance. Cost based on age of employee. 240 WORKERS COMPENSATION Cost per employee annually $3.75/$100 plant workers. $0.59/$100 administrative Based on a 40 hour base pay. 250 UNEMPLOYMENT 1 % Base Wages. All wages now applicable to unemployment taxes. 270 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE Board cost: PROGRAM $2.00 per employee per month. Provides family counseling and referral service to employees and their families. SERVICE CONTRACTS: ~ 310 MEDICAL SERVICES Employee physicals, drug screens/injections, 320 ACCOUNTING AND Annual Audit. Accounting services AUDrrING as required. 321 ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL Attorney fees. 322 TOXICITY LEGAL FEES Continuing Operational Permit Legislation. 338 PRETREATMENT PROGRAM Monitoring of program. Required quarterly influent, effluent and sludge priority pollutant scans. 339 TOXICITY TESTING EPA/DER Discharge Permit will require biimonthly acute toxicity testing ($25,000) and quarterly chronic toxicity testing ($15,000) 340 SLUDGE HAULING Based on 15 mgd 19,439,178 gal- lons. 6 % solids @ cost $28.00/1,000 gallons hauled. 341 SLUDGE, LIQUID, (1) fecal - monthly, ( 4 ) heavy CHEMICAL ANALYSIS metals. ( 2 ) grease samples I TESTING yearly. I'," - 342 IBM COMPU'l'ERS ( 6 ) Service Contracts for computers and monitors. 343 COPIERS Maintenance contract plus estimated parts and service not included in contract. (Based on 7,500 copies/month) 344 FLORIDA SERVICE Calibration of transmitters, METER CALIBRATION totalizers, recorders and flowmeter pump as required 345 GRIT HAULING Based on 15 mgd projected flow (365 days per year) 808,000 lbs. grit ~ $.0225/lb. I Hauling $65 per trip. NEW ITEM: Vactor Waste Disposal 500,000 lbs. (3 cu yds per ci ty per week). $10,000 346 SERVICE CONTINGENCY Water ConcH tioner, HSDS Service, Lab Electric Analytical Balance, Lab Thermometer Calibration, Laboratory Quality Control, Postage meter and scale, Fax J.1ach i ne, Fire extinguishers, Timeclock, Dictaphone, IBM type- writers, Daisywheel Printer, Action-writer and any other service contracts as needed. 390 CONTRACT WORK Computerization Plant appraisal McGinley Associates Annual Air Scrubbers Ocean Outfall inspection I OPERATIONS/MAINTENANCE 400 TECHNICAL SESSIONS Operators Short Schools, Regional Schools, Lab Technical and Quality Assurance Short Schools, Personnel Seminars, Computer Classes, WPCF Convention, Technical Schools. Annual Conference. NEW ITEM Chlorine Safety Training Program $3500 401 AUTOMOBILE LEASE (1) Lease vehicle 12 months @ $290. Mileage allowance @ $.275/mile. Fuel for (4) pickup trucks(l) dump truck and (I) leased automobile and misc. mileage reimbursement. 410 TELEPHONE EXPENSE Monthly base fees and long distance usage including Fax machine, (2) Cellular Phones @ $35/mo. each base fees. 440 RENTAL EQUIPMENT Cranes, various equipment and instruments as required in maintenance and operations. 450 INSURANCE EXPENSE Property Liability Fidelity and Public Officials Bond Vechicle Insurance Pollution Liability Insurance Public Officials and Employees I,iabili ty. NEW ITEM Property Liability Aeration Basin/Pump Station Expansion $8,000 1.'11 ~ 460 BUILDINGS/ Painting, repair or replacement SUPPLIES of doors, screens, locks, windows, ceiling tiles; electrical, plumb- i.ng, and li.ghting. 461 PLANrr EQUIPMENT Annual repair items for compres- sors, blowers, clarifiers, aerators, chlorinators, pumps, motors, gear drives. Normal wear pumps and plant equipment. 462 PLAN'l' VEH ICLES Trucks, service carts, trac- tors. and front end loader 463 GROUNDS AND Grounds and Administration ADM. BUILDING Building Maintenance Contract, MAINTENANCE landscaping, sprinkler systems, retention ponds, piping, fertilizer and administration building cleaning. NEW ITEM Ground Maintenance Contract $35,000 Admin. Maintenance Contract $15,000 464 IDEN'l'IFIED Funds for emergency or unidentified DEFICIENCIES equipment deficiencies that require CONTIGENCY upgrade or improvement in operation. 490 ADVERTISING Advertisement and legal ad allowance related to plant operation or bids and public notices. 491 LICENSES AND PERMITS Radio FCC license $75, P.B. County Health Department License $2150. FEC Railroad crossing permit $20, operational permit fees, Lab per- mits, Air Pollution - PBC Health Dept. $100. (2) Storm water Utility Assessments $1000. NEW ITEM Aeration Basin/Pump Station Expansion $2,000 .' - SUPPLIES - CHEMICALS 510 OFFICE SUPPLIES/ Annual projection: postage, copier CONSUMABLES paper, stationary, business cards, all check printing, general office supplies and necessities. 515 SAFETY SUPPLIES Gloves,protective glasses,face shields,aprons,hearing protec tection,overboots,ear plugs, muf f, emergency eye wash station, emer- gency showers, cartridge respi- rators, gas cartridge, sterile storage bags for respirators,disin- fection system for respirators, fit test ampules, respirator stor- age cabinets, disposable respir ators, chemical spill absorbents, oil sorbent, liquid chemical neu- tralizers , barricade tape, hazar- dous materials response kit, sal- vage drum, diffusion detector tubes, signs, labels, tags, first aid supplies, fire extinguishers and accessories , hazardous area lights, emergency small tools, safety charts, books, safety contingency. 520 UNIFORMS Board participates 50% in uniform rental. Board cost $3.75 per week. Cost to purchase 7 pants and 7 shirts provided on a one time basis cost of $225 per employee. (Provid ed 3 new sets each year $75). Annual work shoe allowance $50 per employee. , 521 BOARD CONTINGENCY Board plaques, Public Relations good will tours, floral arrange- ments or fruit baskets, cards, for illnesses or funerals, and business expenses including , Executive Director's moving expenses $5,000 . ~ 522 CHEMICALS .1 POLYMER Estimated annual 40,120 Ibs. @ 1.77/1b. concentrated polymer. Feed rate 9.5 Ibs per ton dry solids . 2 IJIME Calculated 640 tons @ $88.00 per ton .3 CHLORINE Pre Chlorination 3000 Ibs/day Post Chlorination 900 Ibs/day 718 tons @ $ll3/ton. NEW I'l'EM Aeration/Basin Pump Station Expansion $3,000 . 5 CHEMICAL (1) Sulfuric Acid CONTINGENCY 52 carboys @ $125/carboy $6500 ( 2 ) HTH 4 drums @ $IOD/drum. $400 ( 3 ) Sodium Hydroxide -$6,000 ( 4 ) Cleaning Agents 3 drums @ $500 - $1,500 NEW ITEM Aeration Basin/Pump Station Expansion (5)Additional Sodium Hydroxide- $20,500 ( 6 ) Hydrochloric Acid - $5,000 523 GENERAL OPERATING Operating supplies, raingear, SUPPLIES hardhats, H2S pads boots, drager tubes, gloves, hoses, firehoses, extinguishers, chart pens,charts (small supplies for day-to-day operation) . Sludge jUdges,_ flags, coffee supplies, water cooler supplies, batteries, hurricane supplies. 524 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Mops, broom s, paper goods, brushes, all necessary janitorial cleaning supplies. , . '525 LABORATORY SUPPLIES Laboratory upgrades and replace- ments. Reagents, glassware, replace- ment of equipment, apparatus. Lab - supplies consumed by testing proce- dures including Chlorine Testing. 526 OIL, - GREASE, DIESEL, 5000 gals. Diesel fuel for Kubota AND LUBRICANTS and generator, gas, grease, oil and lubricants for pumps and mowers. NEW ITEM Aeration Basin/Pump Station Exp. Fuel for new generators $4,000 527 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL Willkways, signs, fencing, rails, platforms, small shelters, concrete etc. Additional office and storage units. 528 PURCHASE OF SMALL Handtools, drills, bits, files, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT small toolboxes, electrical equipment, small maintenance tools, and ( 4 ) safety lights @ $425 <$500 value>. 529 OFFICE EQUIPMENT Filing cabinets, chairs, calcula- tors, adding machines, office mats, shelves, printers, tables <$500 value> . 530 LAB EQUIPMENT Magnetic stirrers, automatic titration attachment, oxygen probe, and small equipment. <$500 value> 531 ELECTRICITY Projected 26,427 KWH daily Total 9,645,687 KWH annually @.065/KWH. NEW ITEM Aeration Basin/Pump Sta. Exp. 1,204,675 kwh - $80,000 FPL rate increase - $35,000 532 WATER CONSUMPTION Budgeted for 1,200,000 gallons monthly @ $.65/1000 gals. Centrifuge 400,000 gals./month Lime Slaker 130,000 gals./month 1 533 GARBAGE COLLECTION Twelve months @ $28.00 plus addi- tional dump fees for trash hauling (4 trips @$50). ..,,' . 540 MEMBERSHIPS AND DUES F~JPCOA dues and subscriptions. WPCF' Journals, newspapers, Personnel and Human Resources Sub- scriptions and Dues. Operational Subscriptions and Dues, Safety Council. 541 EDUCATIONAL Classes, books, and fees. EXPENSES 600 ENGINEERING General Consulting, attenu meetings of the Board and regulatory agencies, prepares information as needed, provides engineering information data, assists the Board with other permits required by EPA and DER, and to meet unforeseen engineering and laboratory services. 601 BIO'l'OXICITY Toxicity evaluation and ENGINEERING monitoring of acute and chronic toxicity testing reports. 602 PRE'l'REATMENT Industrial Pretreatment Program ENGINEERING is a requirement of NPDES permit as administered by EPA. Assistance preparing annual reports, estab- lishing program guidelines, prepar- ing ordinances, and coordinating activities between the Board and the two cities. . , . ~ MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROH: CI'rY Iv1ANAGER{~1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # caF - tvIEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 RATIFICA'I'ION OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD CAPITAL BUDGET DATE: August 7, 1991 The South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board (SCRWTD) at its July 18th meeting approved their Capital Expenditures budget for fiscal year 1991-92 in the amount of $39,862. This amount represents a decrease of $49,973 from last years budget. The purchase of maintenance, operational, and laboratory equipment is proposed. A detailed list of equipment is attached as backup material for this item. Expenditures are to be assessed 50% to the City of Boynton Beach and 50% to the City of Delray Beach. Recommend ratification of the South Central Regional Wastewater 'I'rea tment and Disposal Board's Capital Expenditures budget for fiscal year 1991-92. ~~- 1;- .t!G lPj;LI /91 oJ ~ n" . ~ K~. kCjI-/~~ . ~ RATIFICATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD ACTION OF JULY 18, 1991 WHEREAS, the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board did on July 18, 1991, by a vote of 7-0, approve the Capital Expenditures portion of the operating Budget for Fiscal Year 1991-1992 in the amount of $39,862.00, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and, WHEREAS, funding for said expenditures is to be assessed 50% to the City of Boynton Beach and 50% to the City of Delray Beach; and, WHEREAS, the Board action requires ratification by the City of Boynton Beach and the City of Delray Beach; NOW THEREFORE, the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, and the City of Delray Beach, Florida, hereby ratify said Board action independently. The above action is hereby ratified in open session by the Ci ty of Boynton Beach this ~ day of .4//&:u~ /99/. Witnesses: CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk (SEAL) Approved as to form: City Manager City Attorney . The above action is hereby ratified in open session by the City of Delray Beach the day of . Witnessess: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BY: Mayor Attest: City Clerk (SEAL) Approved as to form: City Manager City Attorney . SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WAS~EWATER TREA~MENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT - CAPITAL ASSETS 1991/92 Diaphragm ~ Pump $3,600.00 , This pump is used to pump heavy sludge from the bottom of the tanks when cleaning them out. Also used for tranferring sludge. Safety Fans ill ! $1600 each $3,200.00 These fans are explosive proof 7600 CFM, 3/4 HP, 115 volt fans used to ventilate blender and aeration tanks or confined areas. Sump Pump for Chemical Building $2,000.00 Pumps raw wastewater from Chemical Building drainage system. Refrigerated Composite Sampler $3,800.00 A replacement for effluent sample unit. Daily permit required collection of 24 hour effluent composite sample to be maintained @ 40 centigrade. TOTAL 12,600.00 ".'1 . SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WAS'l'EWATER TREATMENT AND OJ SPOSAL BOARD ~ OPERATIONS CAPITAL ASSETS 1991/91 Refrigerator $600.00 To be used for bi-monthly toxicity samples and H2S drager tubes and chlorine storage. Krohne America Magnetic Flowmeter Model K480 $2,961.00 For more accurate measurement of sludge hauled. Continuous PH Monitoring Lime Stabilized Sludge $11,956.00 System includes: ( 2 ) PH Analyzers -Model 7082-11 (2) Meredian II Electrode Assemblies Model 777-60-2-42-5-000 (2) Auto-clean Electrode Systems I Model 7791-735-2-0 (l) Chart Recorder Sharp SF-7320 Copier $1,100.00 Copier needed in plant area to eliminate need for operators to walk to Administration Building to make copies. TOTAL $16,617.00 -~"-- - - ~ SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD ~ LABORATORY DEPARTMENT CAPITAL ASSETS 1991/92 Flaskscrubber Freestand unit $5,090.00 Model EA 940 pH/ISE Meter 2,375.00 Electrode Switchbox 1,180.00 Refrigerator (Explosion proof) 2,000.00 TOTAL $10,645.00 Flaskscrubber Freestand Unit: Replace the Flaskscrubber currently out of service. Superior performance, more effective and powerful stearn action penetrates hard to reach places to remove dried or baked on contaminants. The system prevents unwanted residue. Specially designed detachable water and sump heater sanitizes glassware without the risk of injury to workers. Final rinse with reverse osmosis purified water. Model EA 940 pH/ISE Meter: Basic component of the Automatic Titration Unit. Actually, we are using a Demo supplied by the Manufacturer of the Titration unit. Electrode Switchbox: To analyse several parameters without connecting , and disconnecting electrodes. Improve speed of analysis, the life of the electrodes and equipment connections. Each input operates independently with separate amplifiers, eli- minating cross talk between channels. Refrigerator: For storing and preserve temperature-sensitive reagents and samples, (volatiles and nonvolatiles). All electrical components are external, sealed in an explosion-proof housing. Exterior wiring is sealed in explosion-proof conduit. "" - - ~~ MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER fIt ) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ?!& - MEETING OF AUGUST 13 , 1991 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AND SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 1/ O'BRIEN, SUITER AND O'BRIEN . DATE: August 7 , 1991 This is before you to approve the contract between the City and O'Brien, Suiter and O'Brien for land surveying services and to approve Service Authorization No. 1 to that contract for surveying services in conjunction with the 1991 Road Reconstruction program- Part A (Tropic Isles) . At your March 26, 1991 regular meeting the Commission approved the ranking of the top three land surveying firms and authorized staff to negotiate and award a contract for land surveying services. Subsequently, staff has negotiated a contract with the second ranked firm) O'Brien, Suiter and O'Brien. This is a standard consulting services contract. Tasks will be authorized by the City Commission via approved service authorizations. The contract contains the standard indemnification clausej however, provides a $250,000 limitation on the extent of the consultant's liability. Service Authorization No. 1 is in the amount of $4,000 for surveying services in conjunction with the 1991 Road Reconstruction program- Part A (Tropic Isles). The scope of service for this authorization includes field surveying and base map street surveys for those streets and segments of streets, Iris Drive, Spanish Trail, Avenue II L II , in the Tropic Isles subdivision which are to be reconstructed. Funding is available in the Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Street Reconstruction (Account No. 225-3162-544-61. 17) . Account balance $1,417,435. Recommend approval of the contract between the City and O'Brien, Suiter and O'Brien for surveying services and approve Service Authorization No. 1, in the amount of $4,000, for surveying services in conjunction with the 1991 Road Reconstruction program- Part A (Tropic Isles) with funding from Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Street Reconstruction (Account No. 225-3162-544-61.17) . - . . ,. _.. . ----.-.-.- ..._~--- , . ~ CITY OF DELRAY BEACH CONSULTING SERVICE AUTHORIZATION DATE: May 16. 1991 SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. ~ FOR CONSULTING SERVICES CITY P.O. NO. CITY EXPENSE CODE ~25' 31"2 -.f:,-of//.- (,1./7 PROJECT NO. 91-81 (CITY) (CONSULTANT) TITLE: 1991 Road Reconstruction Proqram - Part A Tropic Isles Area I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION There are streets in the Tropic Isles area - namely Iris Drive, Spanish Trail, Avenue 'L' - which are in need of repair and reconstruction. Iris Drive in particular is in a serious condition of disrepair. This consulting Service Authorization will provide for field surveying and base map street surveys for those streets and segments of streets to be reconstructed. Actual design of improvements can not begin until the base map street surveys are in hand. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Land surveying Consultant shall prepare street surveys to be used as engineering base maps for the proposed road reconstruction program. The scope of work shall include the fOllowing surveying services: 1. Field Topography and Tie-in of all existing improvements within the right-of-way including the beginning and terminal intersections of the road segments to be reconstructed. 2. 1" = 20' scale drawings on City-furnished mylars showing field information including, but not limited to: - Topographic elevations at 50' intervals to depict centerline grade, edge of pavement grade, location and grade of swale centerline and right-of-way. - Location and dimensions of existing roadway, pavement, driveways, sidewalks, curb, etc. - Location of existing utilities and drainage facilities with pipe direction and invert elevations. City of Delray Beach Service Authorization No. 1 Page Two - Location of all trees, shrubs, mailboxes, signa, trees, power poles, fences and other encumbrances found within the right-of-way. 3. All labor, equipment and materials necessary to furnish the above described complete base map survey drawings. The road segments to be reconstructed are described as follows: 1. commencing at the intersection of Hyacinth Drive and Spanish Trail proceeding southward on spanish Trail past Avenue "L" and continuing southwesterly along what is called Tropic Isle Drive to the intersection of Tropic Isle Drive and Spanish Trail. 2. Commencing at the Intersection of Florida Boulevard and Avenue "L" proceeding eastward on Avenue "L" to the Intersection of Avenue "L" and Spanish Trail. 3. Commencing at the Intersection of Florida Boulevard and Iris Drive proceeding eastward on Iris Drive to the easterly cul-de-sac terminus of Iris Drive. III. BUDGET ESTIMATE OF SERVICES Officer in Charge 3 hours @ $25/hr = $ 75 3 Man Field Crew 36 hours @ $26/hr = 936 Draftsman 24 hours @ $12/hr = 288 Salary Cost $ 1,299 Salary Cost X 3.0 $ 3,897 Miscellaneous Expenses 103 Total Fee $ 4,000 Consultant shall provide the services described in Section I and II of this Service Authorization for a lump sum fee of $4,000. IV. COMPLETION DATE The work outlined in this consulting service authorization will be completed by the surveyor in two weeks. Assuming authorization is issued May 21, 1991, the street survey base maps will be delivered to the City by June 4, 1991. TT:mm File: TTEPR520.MRM - Project #91-81 City of Delray Beach Service Authorization No. 1 Page Three ~ APPROVED BY THE CITY CONSULTANT OF DELRAY BEACH By:fh/<hbrJ DAY OF - CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida ATTE~ By: ' /~~ BEFORE ME, the foreg ~nl ~nstru- Mayor ment, thi~day of \J~ 51 1991, was acknowle ed by , ATTEST: ~I .I~ S, . duly aut or~zed off~cer of . By: the corporation and said person City Clerk executed the same free and . voluntarily for the purpose there- in expressed. APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: WITNESS my hand and seal in the city Attorney ~ty and Jitle aforesaid this day of i , 1991. ", , ' ' Notary Public I 'I . State of Florida .) / J " ~J ; - My Commission Expires;'! II ' I . ( , No~ hWic. itcMl~ FI.~~ (Seal) My Cornrioli,.sioo llpir" Slpt: 5, t"" Bonded t..." T.Jy fcnr .."n~..~.~ ".1 . - AGREEMENT FOR SURVEYING SERVICES . Consultant: O'Brien, Suiter & O'Brien, Inc. Date: May, 1991 -'"--. .'-"-'-"'-'~- 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paqe I. Definitions; General Considerations 1 II. General Duties of Consultant 2 III. Duties of Consultant 4 IV. Data and Services to be Provided by City 5 V. Time of Performance 5 VI. Agreement Period 6 VII. Compensation 6 VIII.Payment 8 IX. Miscellaneous Provisions A. Ownership of Documents 8 B. Copies of Documents 9 C. Insurance 9" D. Litigation Services 11 E. Authority to Contract 12 F. Assignment 12 G. Confidential Information 12 H. Non-Exclusive Contract 12 1. Sub-Consultants 13 J. Notices 13 K. Attachments 13 L. Truth-In Negotiation Certificate 13 M. Records 14 N. Personnel 14 O. Equal Opportunity Employment; Non-Discrimination 14 P. Prohibition Against Contingent Fees 14 Q. Termination 15 R. Indemnification 15 S. Interest of the Consultant 16 T. Compliance with Laws 16 U. Jurisdiction; Venue 16 V. Attorney's Fees 16 W. Internal Disputes Between Owner and Consultant 17 X. Extent of Agreement 17 Exhibit A: Service Authorization(s) (sample) B: Hourly Rate Chart (sample) C: Invoice" (sample) .. ,~ - AGREEMENT FOR SURVEYING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of , 19____, by and between the CITY of Delray Beach, Florida, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and O'Brien, Suiter & O'Brien, Inc. , hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY has provided notice of the desired professional services and carried out the proper selection process pursuant to and in accordance with the Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act, Chapter 75-281; and; WHEREAS, the CITY represents that it is a Florida Municipal Corporation with the authority to engage the CONSULTANT and to accept the obligation for the services desired; and; WHEREAS, the CITY desires to engage the CONSULTANT to perform certain professional services pertinent to such work in accordance with this AGREEMENT and with SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS to be issued at the time of or subsequent to execution of this AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT shall provide such professional services in accordance with this AGREEMENT and SERVICE AUTHORIZATION(S}. NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits which will accrue to the parties hereto in carrying out the terms of this AGREEMENT, it is mutually understood and agreed as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS; GENERAL CONDITIONS A. THE SCOPE OF WORK is to be implemented as set forth by this AGREEMENT and by SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS, which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, and as also may be added as approved by the CITY from time to time. B. A SERVICE AUTHORIZATION is a form to be used to authorize work, projects, and services. The form shall be execut(3d by the CITY'S and CONSULTANT'S representatives. A CITY purchase order number shall be identified on the form. The purchase order 1 .authorization is established in the CITY Code of Ordinances with provisions for expenditure level of approval authorizations. A sample form of the service authorization is attached as Exhibit "A" to this AGREEMENT. The projects, work and services to be performed by the CONSULTANT. and time for comple- tion of the particular phase of the work by CONSUL- TAN'r shall be authorized by a . SERVICE AUTHORIZATION. The SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall include the scope of work to be performed; the budget cost, complete with an itemization of manhours, wage rates, reimbursable expenses, and other related costs; schedule for completion and name of project manager. The SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall be signed by the CITY and the CONSULTANT'S authorized representative. A City purchase order shall be issued. wi th aut.horization identifying funds and amount of expendi.tures. The terms of this AGREEMENT supersede the terms stated on the purchase order. C. PHASES: A phased approach may be utilized. The CITY and the CONSULTA~T shall have the right to negotiate the terms of each phase as contained within each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, and to reject any SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, if the parties cannot agree to the terms of the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION. In the event the parties cannot agree, the CITY may select another proposer or go out for additional proposals in order to complete the subsequent phase(s) of the project. This phased approach shall not waive the CITY'S right. to terminate the CONSULTANT'S contract during any phase of the project. II. GENERAL DUTIES OF CONSULTANT A. The relationship of the CONSULTANT to the CITY will be that of a professional CONSULTANT, and the CONSUL- TANT will provide the professional and technical services required under this AGREEMENT in accordance with acceptable professional practices and ethical standards. No employer/employee relationships shall be deemed to be established and the CONSULTANT, its agents, subcontractors, and employees shall be independent contractors at all times. B. Professional and Technical Services. It shall be the responsibility jof the CONSULTANT to work with the CITY and apprise it of solutions to problems and the approach or technique to be used towards accomplish- ment of the CITY'S objectives as set forth in SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS, which will be made a part of this AGREEMENT upon execution by both parties. 2 "'11 C. ~The scope of services to be provided shall be covered in detail in SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS. D. The CITY shall establish a budget for each project awarded to CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for providing, at no additional cost to the CITY, drawings, reports and other applicable services if the budget for the entire project is exceeded during and up to completion of the final phase of the project; however, nothing contained herein shall require the CONSULTANT to bear additional costs if the additional costs are a result of a change in the scope of services directed by the CITY. E. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the profes- sional quality, technical accuracy, timely comple- tion, compliance with regulations and rules, and the coordination with all appropriate agencies of all drawings, reports and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT. If the CITY determines there are any errors, omissions or other deficiencies in the CONSULTANT'S, drawings, reports and other services, the CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, correct or revise said errors or omissions to the satisfaction of the CITY. F. Approval by the CITY of drawings, reports and incidental professional services or materials furnished hereunder shall not in any way relieve the CONSULTANT of responsibility for the technical adequacy of its work. The CITY'S review, approval or acceptance of, or payment for, any of the services shall not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights under this AGREEMENT or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this AGREEMENT. G. The CONSULTANT designates John K. Weigand, P.L.S. as its representative to act as liaison with the CITY. The representative shall manage and coordinate CITY projects and is hereby authorized to act on behalf of the CONSULTANT to negotiate and approve SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS and act on any other related matter with respect to performance of services for the CITY in accordance with the AGREEMENT. Any change to name another person shall be requested in writing to the CITY, and shall be approved by the CITY. H. CONSULTANT shall attend all meetings, as specified or as defined in each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION of the CITY 3 "--.".~-_.,---~-------- 4 Commission or any CITY approval Board, where the project is discussed, unless the City's representa- tive declares such attendance and participation is not necessary. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall attend all additional meetings as may be required to facilitate the project. III. DUTIES OF CONSULTANT: The following Duties of CONSULTANT may be separated into phases of the project which if approved via SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS shall be performed by the CONSULTANT. The CITY may require SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS which contain additional re- quirements applicable to the project. The CITY must authorize through SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS, the commencement of each phase of the work. A. The CONSULTANT shall consult with the CITY to clarify and define the CITY'S requirements for the Project and review available data. B. The CONSULTANT shall advise the CITY as to the necessity of the CITY'S providing or obtaining from others, data or services. C. The CONSULTANT shall furnish the number of copies of the Survey and Report documents as provided in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION and review them with the CITY. D. The CONSULTANT, in consultation with the CITY shall determine the general scope, extent and character of the Project. E. Advise the CITY if additional data or services are necessary and assist the CITY in obtaining such data and services. F. The CONSULTANT shall make available all design calculations and associated Data. G. The CONSULTANT shall prepare survey documents which shall include but not be limited to drawings and technical information, general and supplementary conditions, with technical criteria, descriptions and data necessary for permitting by governmental authorities. H. The CONSULTANT shall in the preparation of survey documents, technical criteria, written descriptions and data, take into account all currently prevailing codes and regulations governing construction in the City of Delray Beach, Florida, and shall meet the 4 . requirements of all other agencies or governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the project. IV. DATA AND SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY The CITY shall provide the following: A. Furnish or cause to be furnished such reports, studies, instruments, documents, and other information as the CONSULTANT and CITY mutually deem necessary and which are under control of the CITY. B. Other data and services to be agreed upon in subsequent SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS. C. Pay for all legal advertisements incidental to obtaining bids or proposals from contractors. D. The City Manager or his designee shall act as the CITY'S representative with respect to the work to be performed under this AGREEMENT. The City Manager or his designee shall have the authority to the extent authorized by the City Charter and Code of Ordinances to exercise the rights and responsibilities of the CITY provided in this contract. Said authority may include but is not limited to: transmit instructions, stop work, receive information, interpret CITY'S policies and decisions with respect to materi- als, equipment, elements, and systems pertinent to the services covered by this AGREEMENT. E. Pay all permit application filing fees. F. Provide access to CITY facilities. V. TIME OF PERFORMANCE A. The CONSULTANT will begin work promptly after issuance of a notice to proceed. B~ The CONSULTANT'S services called for under the AGREEMENT shall be completed in accordance with the schedule contained in each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION. If the CONSULTANT'S services are unreasonably delayed by the CITY in excess of 180 days, the time of perfor- mance and compensation shall be renegotiated, provid- ed; however, the CONSULTANT as a condition precedent to renegotiation shall notify the CITY within fifteen (15) calendar days from the end of the said delay of CONSULTANT'S proposed additional costs incurred by reason of said delay. S ---.,--- VI. AGREEMENT PERIOD The period of service is from the date of execution of this AGREEMENT until such time as all outstanding SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS issued have been completed. Each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall delineate a time for completion of the service to be rendered. VII. COMPENSATION A. The CITY will compensate the CONSULTANT for the services performed on each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION in accordance with a negotiated lump sum, or a not to exceed budgeted amount based on time charges which are based upon hourI y rates, plus reimbursable expenses if compensation is based on Method II and other related costs as are specified in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION. 1. METHOD 1 - LUMP SUM Lump Sum Amount. Wherever possible, the scope of services for Services, Projects or Programs shall be thoroughly defined and outlined prior to its authorization. The CITY and CONSULTANT shall mutually agree to a lump sum amount for services to be rendered and a detailed scope of services. Should the CITY deem that a change in the scope of services is appropriate, then a decrease or increase in compensation shall be authorized in writing. In lump sum contracts, the CONSULTANT shall submit the estimated man hours, wage rates and other actual unit costs supporting the compensation. The CONSULTANT shall submit a truth in negotiation certificate stating- that all data supporting the compensa- tion is accurate, complete and current at the time of contracting. 10 2 . METHOD II - TIMES CHARGES/ NOT TO EXCEED BUDGET- ED AMOUNT Computation of Time Charqes/Not to Exceed Amount. When a service is to be compensated for on a time charge/not to exceed basis, the CONSULTANT will submit a not to exceed budget cost to the CITY for prior approval based on actual time charges which shall not exceed established hourly rates as shown in Exhibi t B attached hereto, plus reimbursable expenses and other related costs. The CITY shall not be obligated to reimburse the CONSULTANT for costs incurred in excess of the not to exceed cost amount. 6 ".fI - a. The CITY agrees to pay the CONSULTANT compensation for services rendered based upon the established raw hourly salary rates as shown in Exhibit B for services rendered on CITY projects multiplied by an overhead factor containing a ten percent (10%) profit, which shall not exceed 3.0. The overhead factor may be subject to audit. The schedule of hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit B is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The rates listed in Exhibit B may be adjusted upon AGREEMENT of the parties. b. In addition, the CITY shall pay for reim- bursable expenses invoiced at the actual cost of expenditures incurred by the CONSULTANT if provided in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION as follows: ( 1 ) Actual expense of transportation and lodging in accordance with CITY policy in effect at the time of travel when traveling in connection with each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, express courier charges, and permit fees paid for in assisting the CITY in securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the project. ( 2 ) Actual expense of reproductions of Drawings and Specifications including duplicate sets of the completion of each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION for the CITY'S review and approval. ( 3 ) Actual expenses of testing, laboratory services, and field equipment. (4) Actual expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, when authorized by the CITY. (5 ) Actual expense of Auto Travel at the established CITY rate per mile for travel outside Palm Beach County. 7 B. ~Subcontractual service shall be invoiced at the actual fees paid by the CONSULTANT, plus an addition- al ten percent (10%) of the cost of these services to compensate CONSULTANT, for the procuring and manage- ment of the sub-consultant, and for the other financal and administrative costs. Subcontractual services shall be approved by the CITY in writing prior to performance of the subcontractual work. C. Total Compensation (including, but not limited to compensation for sub-consultants) for all services and expenses shall not exceed the budget cost listed upon each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, without written approval. D. If the CITY determines that any price for services, however calculated provided by the CONSULTANT, including profit, negotiated in connection with this AGREEMENT or any cost reimbursable under this AGREE- MENT was increased by any significant sums because the CONSULTANT or any subcontractor furnished incom- plete or inaccurate costs or pricing data, then such price or cost or profit shall be reduced accordingly and the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall be reduced accordingly and the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall be modified in writing to reflect such reduction. VIII.PAYMENT The CITY agrees that it will use its best effort to pay the CONSULTANT within thirty (30) calendar days from presentation of the CONSULTANT'S itemized report and invoice and approval of the CITY'S representative, unless additional time for processing is required for payments for basic services, subcontractual services, and reimburs- able expenses as defined in Section VI I . The CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices, as required in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, which shall include a report of work completed during the respective invoice period. Invoices shall be in a forn.at consistent with those shown in Exhibit C. The report shall be adequate in detail to describe work progress (% complete for each task) and written summaries of work completed. No payment request shall exceed the value of work and services performed by the CONSULTANT under the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION. IX. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. Ownership of Documents: A set of reproducible mylar drawings, field notes, computations, C.A.D. disks in a format compatible with CITY'S Computer system shall be given to the 8 " .~ . CITY. Details, design calculations, and all other documents and plans that result from the CONSULTANT'S SERVICES under this AGREEMENT shall become and remain the property of the CITY, including patent and copyright rights, whether the project is completed or not and will be delivered to the City upon demand. CONSULTANT reserves the right to retain a copy of all such documents for record purposes. Where such documents are required to be filed with governmental agencies, the CONSULTANT will furnish copies to the CITY upon request. The contract work is represented by hard copy documentation; software, is provided to the CITY for convenience only. B. Copies of Documents: The CONSULTANT shall prepare sufficient copies of all documents necessary to obtain approval through the CITY'S processes, as well as other governmental authorities. See also Section III (C) for additional requirements. The CITY acknowledges that the materi- als cited in Paragraph IX A. and other data provided in connection with this AGREEMENT which are provided by the CONSULTANT are not intended for use in connec- tion with any project other than the project for which such materials are prepared. Any use by the CITY of such materials in connection with a project other than that for which such materials were pre- pared without prior written consent and adaptation by the CONSULTANT shall be at the CITY'S sole risk, and the CONSULTANT shall have no responsibility or liability therefore. C. Insurance: Without limiting any of the other obligations or liabilities of the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall, at his own expense, provide and maintain in force, until all of its services to be performed under this AGREEMENT have been completed and accepted by the CITY (or for such duration as it otherwise specified hereinafter), the following insurance coverages: 1. Worker's Compensation Insurance to apply to all of the CONSULTANT'S employees in compliance with the "Worker's Compensation Law" of the State of Florida and all applicable Federal Laws. A. Employer's Liability with limits of $100,000 per person, $500,000 per occur- rence and $100,000 per each disease. 2. Comprehensive General Liability with minimum 9 4 limits of One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00) per occurrence combined single limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. Coverage must be afforded on a form no more restrictive than the latest edition of the Comprehensive General Liability policy, without restrictive endorsements other than ISO Endorse- ment GL 21 06 (Engineers, Architects, or Survey- ors Professional Liability exclusion), as Filed by the Insurance Services Office and must include: a. Premises and/or Operations b. Independent Contractors c. Products and Completed Operations - CONSUL- TANTS shall maintain in force until at least three years after completion of all services required under this AGREEMENT, coverage for Products and Completed Opera- tions, including Broad Form Property Damage. d. Broad Form Property Damage e. Contractual Coverage applicable to this specific AGREEMENT. f. Personal Injury Coverage with minimum limits of coverage equal to those required for Bodily Injury Liability. 3. Business Automobile Liability with minimum limits of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($ 300,000.00) per occurrence combined single limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. Coverage must be afforded on a form no more restrictive than the latest edition of the Business Automobile Liability policy, without restrictive endorsements, as filed by the Insurance Services Office and must include: a. Owned Vehicles b. Hired and Non-Owned Vehicles c. Employers' Non-Ownership 4 . Professional Liability Insurance with minimum limits of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($ 250,000.00) per occurrence. Coverage shall be afforded on a form acceptable to the CITY. 10 " .~ ~ CONSULTANT shall maintain such professional liability insurance until at least one year after a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5 . Prior to cO.mnencement of services, the CONSUL- TANT shall provide to the CITY Certificates of Insurance evidencing the insurance coverage specified in the foregoing Paragraphs Cl, C2, C3, C4. All policies covered within subpara- graphs Cl, C2, C3, C4, shall be endorsed to provide the CITY with thirty (30) days notice of cancellation and/or restriction. The CITY shall be named as an additional insured as to CONSUL- TANT'S liability on policies referenced in subparagraph C2. The required Certificates of Insurance shall not only name the types of policies provided, but also shall refer specifically to this AGREEMENT and section and to the above paragraphs in accordance with which insurance is being furnished, and shall state that such insurance is as required by such paragraphs of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall also make available to the CITY a certi- fied copy of the professional liability insur- ance policy required by paragraph 4 above for the CITY'S review. Upon request, the CONSULTANT shall provide copies of all other insurance policies. 6 . If the initial insurance policies required by this AGREEMENT expire prior to the completion of the services, renewal Certificates of Insurance of policies shall be furnished thirty (30) days prior to the date of their expiration. For Notice of Cancellation and/or Restriction; the policies must be endorsed to provide the CITY with thirty (30) days notice of cancellation and/or restriction. 7 . The CONSULTANT'S insurance, including that applicable to the CITY as an Additional Insured, shall apply on a primary basis. D. Litigation Services: It is understood and agreed that CONSULTANT'S services include reasonable participation in litiga- tion or dispute resolution arising from this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANTS participation shall include up to 30 hours of services related to litigation or dispute resolution. Any such services in excess of 30 hours shall be an additional service. 11 E. Autherity to Contract: The CITY represents that it is a Florida Municipal. Corporation with the authority to engage the CONSULTANT for professional services described in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS and to . accept the obligation for payment for the services described in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS. F. Assignment: The CITY and the CONSULTANT each binds itself and its successors, legal representatives, and assigns to the other party to this AGREEMENT and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such other party, in respect to all covenants of this AGREEMENT subject to budget considerations and requirements of law; and, neither the CITY nor the CONSULTANT will assign or transfer their interest in this AGREEMENT without the written consent of the other. G. Confidential Information: During all times that the CONSULTANT is employed on behalf of the CITY and at all times subsequent to the date of this contract, all discussions between the CITY and the CONSULTANT and all information developed or work products produced by the CONSULTANT during its employment and all matters relevant to the business of the CITY not otherwise being a matter of public record shall be deemed to be confidential. All such information and work product shall be protected by the CONSULTANT and shall not be revealed to other persons without the express written permis- sion of the CITY, unless mandated by order of the court. H. Non-Exclusive Contract: The CITY reserves the right to award projects to other firms pursuant to the Florida Statutes Consul- tant's Competitive Negotiations Act during the period of service of the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT agrees to cooperate. with the CITY and other firms in accom- plishing work that may require joint efforts to accomplish the CITY'S goals. This cooperation, when requested by the CITY, will include but not be limited to: 1- Sharing technical information developed under contract with the CITY. 2 . Joint meetings for project coordination. 12 .3. Establish lines of communication. I. Subconsultants: In the event the CONSULTANT, during the course of the work under this AGREEMENT requires the services of any subcontractors or other professional associates in connection with services covered by this AGREE- MENT, CONSULTAN'J' must secure the prior written approval of the ~ITY. J. Notices: Whenever either party desires to give notice unto the other, it must be given by written notice, sent by registered United States mail, with return receipt requested, addressed to the party for whom it is intended at the place last written, as the place for giving of notice in compliance with the provisions of this paragraph. For the present, the parties desig- nate the following as the respective places of giving of notice to wit: City of Delray Beach City Manager City of Delray Beach, Florida 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 CONSULTANT O'Brien, Suiter & O'Brien, Inc. 2601 N. Federal Hiqhway De1ray Beach, FL 33483 K. Attachments: Request for Qualifications is hereby incorporated within and made an integral part of this AGREEMENT. L. Truth-In-Neqotiatlon Certificate: Signature of this AGREEMENT by CONSULTANT shall act as the execution of a truth in negotiation certifi- cate stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation of this AGREEMENT are accurate, complete, and current. The original contract price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the CITY determines the contract price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. 13 M. ~ Records: Records of all expenses relative to each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis and shall be available to the CITY or its authorized representative at mutually conve- nient times. N. Personnel: The CONSULTANT represents that it has or will secure, at its own expense, qualified personnel required in performing the services under this AGREEMENT. All work shall be performed under the direction of a professional, registered under the State of Florida in the field for which he is responsible for perform- ing such services. The project manager shall be approved by the CITY under each SERVICE AUTHORIZA- TION. Key project personnel will be identified for each project and expected to perform the work assign- ment as can reasonably be expected, and as approved by the CITY. O. Equal Opportunity Employment; Non-Discrimination: CONSULTANT agrees that it will not discriminate against employees or applicants for employment because of race, creed, color, religion, sex, age, handicapped status or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruit- ment advertising; lay-off or termination; rates of payor other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth this non-discrimination clause. This provision applies to all CONSULTANT'S subcontractors and it is the responsibility of CONSULTANT to ensure subcontractor's compliance. P. Prohibition Aqainst Contingent Fees: The CONSULTANT warrants that he has not employed or retained any . company or person, other than a . bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this AGREEMENT, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any persons, company, corpora- tion, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or any other considera- tion, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this AGREEMENT. 14 "., Q. _ Termination: This AGREEMENT may be terminated by either party by seven ( 7 ) calendar days prior written notice, in the event of substantial failure to perform in accordance with the terms hereof by the other party through no fault of the terminating party. The CONSULTANT and the CITY shall also have a right to terminate this AGREEMENT for convenience at any time by thirty (30) calendar days written notice to either one or the other. In the event the project described in any SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, or the services of the CONSUL- TANT called for under any SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, is or are suspended, canceled, or abandoned by the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall be given five days prior written notice of such action and shall be compensated for the professional services provided and reimbursable expenses incurred up to the date of suspension, cancellation or abandonment. The CONSULTANT agrees to provide all documents to the CITY (specifically those referenced in paragraph IX.A. Further, prior to the CONSULTANT'S destruction of any of the above- referenced documents, the CITY shall be notified and allowed a reasonable period to gain access to and make copies of any such documents. Upon any termina- tion of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT agrees that it shall use its best efforts to work harmoniously with any successor who enters an AGREEMENT to provide services for the CITY in order to provide for a smooth transition period. R. Indemnification: The CONSULTANT will at all times indemnify, save and hold harmless and defend the CITY, its officers, agents (the term agents shall not include the con- tractor(s), any subcontractors, any materialmen or others who have been retained by the CITY or CONTRAC- TOR, or materialmen to supply goods or services tro the project) and employees, from and against all liability, any claim, demand, damage, loss, expense or cause of action and costs (including attorney's fees at trial or appellate levels) arising out of error, omission, or negligent act of consultant, its agents, servants or employees in the performance of services under this agreement. The CONSULTANT further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents and employees from and against any claim, demand or cause of action arising out of any negligence or misconduct of CONSULTANT for which the CITY, its agents, servants or employees are alleged to be liable. The indemnifications contained herein shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this AGREEMENT. The monetary limita- tion on the extent of the CONSULTANT'S liability 15 W. . Internal Dispute Between Owner and Consultant: The City Manager shall be the final decision maker regarding internal disputes between CITY and CONSUL- TANT. X. Extent of Aqreernent: This AGREEMENT represents the entire integrated AGREEMENT between the CITY and the CONSULTANT and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or AGREEMENTS, written or oral. This AGREEMENT may not be amended, changed, modified, or otherwise altered in any way, at any time after the execution hereof, except by approval of the City Commission and Consultant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Mayor, and attested and, its official Seal to be hereunto affixed by its City Clerk, and the CONSULTANT has hereunto set its hand and Seal t.he day and year first written above. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORiDA 'BRIEN, INC. By: MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to Form: a ,t.~~b CITY Attorney 17 H.H ~ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IF CORPORATION State of Florida County of Palm Beach J BEFORE ME, the fore;oing instrument, this 23/2/J day of ULV , 19....2.L, was acknowledged by \../tJl-l/J K. J{/G/{JA)J/? , on behalf of the Corporation and said person executed the same freely and voluntarily for the purpose therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and State aforesaid this 2'-8t20day of ~LV ~ ~ (~/ ,~ Notary Public . (SEAL) My Commission Expires: Notary 'ublic. S'o'e of "orii,~ My Commiuion Expire. Sept. 5, 1994 londed lhru Tr.y fai" .Inlurancelnc. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IF AN INDIVIDUAL State of Florida County of Palm Beach I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this date before me, an officer duly authorized in the state and county named above to take acknowledgments, personally appeared , known to me to be the person in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this day of I 19 . - Notary Public My Commission Expires: 18 ~ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IF A PARTNERSHIP State of Florida County of Palm Beach I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this date before me, an officer duly authorized in the state and county named above to take acknowledgments, personally appeared , known to me to be the person in and who executed the foregoing instrument as a partner of , a partnership. He/She acknowleged before that he/she executed the same as the act and deed of said partnership for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this day of , 19 . - Notary Public My Commission Expires: 19 "'I ~ EXHIBIT A (SAMPLE) O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH CONSULTING SERVICE AUTHORIZATION DATE: ' SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. FOR CONSULTING SERVICES CITY P.O. NO. CITY EXPENSE CODE PROJECT NO.: (CITY) (O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC. ) TITLE: This Service Authorization, when executed, shall be incorporat- ed in and shall become an integral part of the Contract. Title: I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION II. SCOPE OF SERVICES III. BUDGET ESTIMATE OF SERVICES IV. COMPLETION DATE This service authorization is approved contingent upon the City's acceptance of and satisfaction with the completion of 20 ---"'~--_..- , 4 the services rendered in the previous phase or as encompassed by the previous service authorization. If the City in its sole discretion is unsatisfied with the services provided in the previous phase or service authorization, the City may terminate the contract without incurring any further liability. The CONSULTANT may not commence work on any service authorization approved by the City to be included as part of the contract without a further notice to proceed. Approved by: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH: CONSULTANT: Date Date 7/2:;//:79/ I Thomas E. Lynch ~// ;r~ / Mayor Witness Witness Attest: BEFORE ME, the foregoing instrument, this day of , 1991, Approved as to Legal was acknowledged by Sufficiency and Form on behalf of the Corporation , and said person executed the same free and voluntarily for the purpose there-in expressed. Witness my hand and seal in the County and State aforesaid this day of , 1991. Notary Public State of Florida My Commission Expires: 21 ., .~ . . . EXHIBIT B (SAMPLE) Hourly Hourly Raw Raw Salary Salary Rate Rates Times 3.00 Mulitpler Employer Category Professionals -- Engineers, Architects, Planners, Economists, Scientists, Hydrologists, Hydrogeologists, Geologists Technicians -- Drafters, Graphic Artists, Computer, Surveyors, Cartographies, Construction Inspectors Office Support .. 22 . . . . . EXHIBIT C SAMPLE SAMPLE -- COST NOT TO EXCEED FORMAT INVOICE City of Delray Beach Project No. Date Purchase Order No. Client Ref. No. Task Order No. Invoice No. Description of services under Task Order # . Period ending: . LABOR Class Employee Name Rate Hours Amount Subtotal Labor $ EXPENSES Computer Word Processing Auto Rental Postage/Freight Air Transportation print/Reprographics Supplies Subtotal Expenses TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE $ COST SUMMARY Contract, Amount $ Amount Earned This Period $ Amount Previously Earned Amount Remaining $ 23 ".11 . , . . . EXHIBIT C (continued) SAMPLE INVOICE -- LUMP SUM FORMAT INVOICE City of Delray Beach Project No. Date Purchase Order No. Client Ref. No. Task Order No. Invoice No. Description of services under Task Order . Period ending . Total Fee $ _% Complete $ Less Previous Billings Total Earned This Period $ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE $ 24 ---..---...,.,....- ~ M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS I FROM: CITY MANAGER [It- I SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # <6 H - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AND SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 1 - PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: AUGUST 8, 1991 This item is before you to approve the contract between the City and Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc. for sanitary engineering services and to approve Service Authorization No. 1 to that contract for engineering services in conjunction with the Veterans Park Master Pump Station improvement project. At your April 9, 1991, regular meeting, the Commission approved the ranking of the top five sanitary engineering firms and authorized staff to negotiate and award a contract for engineering services. Staff has subsequently negotiated a contract with Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc. . This is a standard consulting services contract. Tasks will be authorized by the City Commission via approved service authorizations. The contract contains the standard indemnification clause. Service Authorization No. 1, in the amount of $6,117.00, is titled Master Pump Station: Alternative Cost & Constructability Evaluation. The scope of services provides for an independent evaluation of the alternatives to upgrade/improve the master pump station, taking into account construction cost estimates, design related issues and constructability related issues for each alternative. Funding is available in 19~1 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Engineering Services (Account No. 447-5166-536-33.11) . Account balance: $129,600. Recommend approval of the contract for sanitary engineering services with Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc. and approval of Service Authorization No. 1 in the amount of $6,117.00 in conjunction with the Veterans Park Master Pump Station improvement project with funding from 1991 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Engineering Services (Account No. 447-5166-536-33.11) . - "'11 ... Agenda Item No.: AGENDA REQUEST Request to be placed on: Date: August 7, 1991 Consent X Reqtil~ Agenda ____Special Agenda ____Workshop Agenda ---- When:Au~ust 13. 1991 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much)____ Request City Commission to approve the Agreement for Engineering Services for Sanitary Engineering Services with Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc. including Service Authorization No. 1 titled Master Pump Station: Alternative Cost and Constructability Evaluation. Funding shall be from 1991 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond 447~5166-536-33.11 in the amount of $ 6,117. ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the A~reement and Service Authorization No. 1 with PEC. Inc. Department Head Signature: tj/i~nMh~,J 'i!,h/~ Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): ~ Funding available: /NO Funding alternatives (if applicable) Account No. & Description44I--GI00-G~~~/1 ~~ 7JV6S Account BalanceJ1A,~ City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: ~/NO [?vI Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: ~tr!isapproved Received: Action: " '~ . PROFESSIONAL ENGiNEERING CONSULTANTS. INC. - CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH CONSULTING SERVICE AUTIIORIZATION No.1 DATE: SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. t FOR CONSULTING SERVICES CITY P.O. NO. ClTY EXPENSE CODE if" 7- 510~ -53{'-33.11 PROJECT NO.: CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH qo -0 5 PEe DB..pJ TITLE: MASTER P.S.: ALTERNATIVE COSTA.C.QNSTRUCIABI1JTY EVALUATION This service authorization, when executed, shall be Incorporated In and shall become an integral part of the Contract, Dated , by and between the City of Delray Beach and PEC. l. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tho Master Pump Station (MPS), located In Veterans Park at the intersection of East Atlantic Avenue and the Intercoastai Waterway, collects wastewater from over 40 smaller upstream stations. Due to deterioration of the wetwell, and aging mechanical equipment and piping, the City of Delra)' Beach has determined the need to improve thIs facility. The design and construction for these improvements is accelerated by the City's renovations to Veteran's Park now underway. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES Provide an Independent evaluation of the alternatives to upgrade/improve the Master Pump Station for the City of Delray Beach based upon information provided by the City and considering the following for each alternative; (1) construction cost estimates; (2) deslen related Issues; (3) constructabllity related issues. Prepare for and meet with City Staff to review data and conclusions of the evaluation, and prepare and submit ten (10) copies of a Letter Report to the City for its use. Detailed Scope of Services Is Included in Attachment A and Attachment B. m. I3UDOET Hourly time charges not to exceed $6117 without funher authorization from the City. IV. COMPLETION DA TB This assignment shall be completed within 30 calendar days from the receipt of this fully ex~uted service authorization or from receipt of City provided Information which wl11 enable PEe to procead with this Scope of Work. This service authorization is approved contingent upon the Chy's acceptance of and satIsfaction with the completion of the services rendered in the previous phase or as encompassed by the previous service authorization. If the City In its sole discretion Is unsatisfied with the services provided In the previous phase or service authorization, the City may terminate the contract without Incurrlni any further liability. t- t t E t~ rl t: t t n,H i CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO.1 Page 2 APPROVED BY THE CITY OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DELRA Y BEACH CONSULTANTS, INC. DA Y OF . 1991 BY: f2 - ~ Q~ R. Craig Batterson. P.E. Type or Print . Date: B '6'<7/ (SEAL) CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, a municipal corporation of the STATE OF FLORIDA A ITEST: BY: BEFo~f; 4~ . m" MAYOR . , e oregomg mstrument, IS 0~ day of ua.f , 1991, was acknowledged by R. eraii Batterson , A TrEST: . a duly authorized officer of Professional Engineering Consultants. Inc. BY: on behalf of the Corporation and said person executed the same free and voluntarily for the purpose therein expressed. APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and City Attorney State aforesaid this ~H- day ofa.,vI4/1991. Notary Public NOTARY P::~lIC; HAi _ OF rLORIDA Ai LARGE State of Florida MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN. 02; 1993 BONDED TJ:RU HUCKLEBERRY & ASSOCIATES My Commission Expires: (SEAL) ~ a - - I - a. d.. o - \0 N i~I::1 li8 ", :..ti ) "1t""I' IIJ . ~ , ".~ i II,; ~ 1 · s] a i ~ 1 ~ J · e e 15 _, M... i ~ tit; e.i ~~J. 'jj Eo ~ ~.IB! 'e~ ~ o~ ] ., ~ oj' 0 ~~ l~: f i .. j' & J 1. Ci I 8 S i 'I '& I (3 ;. .8 I. l>i ll'" Ii .. .:; J fe!, ~~ :;~~ ...~lil j~J ,oi iit: II II R~ ~ ~ ~.. I. -j ~ ~ 1 ~ ;;.. , ::l ~., .~ .. 8~ & u ~ 11 ~] 'a a .. ..1: ..i.li l.. lei c 0 ill ~.! P.i .j I ~ ;E: It ! i >0 ~ n If if [ I! t H J !! ~ ~ E ~ ."1 I ~ f B 'J U ~ i J;i; j . .e . e . n ,;: ,;: . ~ MM ~ ~D. ~ ell ~:I:I.... Jile u (3~z!. at. .... , · 1 '1Ci- tI.. . . .. In :i:s . N C"\ !~ M coi 1IQ - , , - ;;C.~:5:2N~L :N5:ME~;iN5 :ON5Ul7AHTS.IHC. P~J;:C7 CaST ESTI~ATE ATTACH~Er4T B p- :1,; C~::Y .. , .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .:: I Ty :J~ JEL i\A~ BEACH :~CJE:- ~A~E...............~AsrER ?U"P ST~TICH; ALT. :OST ~ CONSTRUCT EvALUATION ;~.'JJECT \IU"'BER............ .DHI3 :~TE J. ~Sn~ATE......... ..riUGUST 3, 19Q1 ~~2C~ ~UlTIPL!ER........... 3.0 l r :r-' IIlI': T :PI lrl) 1.(\ .. ..,....... .:.J_..... -._""" I ,.1 I' ff.+ff+f+f+fffff+ffffff+f+ff+ff+ff~.ff.f+f+f+fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff*fffffffffffffffffffftffff.ff+fffffffffffffffftfffffffff+ lABOR caST DETAIL DIRECT IlULTI LETTER TOTAL. L~EQR LABOR LA2G? :L~SS RATE REPORT HOURS COST COST ---------.----- --------- --------- ----- ------- ------- ~.~r!JECT ~ANA6ER $2,.00 13 13 $377 $1,131 SEnOR ENGINEER S22.00 14 14 S308 t9:4 E~SiN:E!i S17.00 02 62 S 1 , 054 S3,162 TECH~rC!AN $14 . 00 0 0 SO $0 DRAFTER {CADDl S1 0 . 00 0 0 so SO CLERICAL S10.00 6 6 $00 Slao ------ .---- ----- ------. SUBTOTAL LABOR HOURS 95 95 11,799 SUBTOTAL lBR DOLLARS $5,397 S5,3Q \ ~f~ff+ffffffffffffffffff'fff+fflffffffffffffffffffff..fffffffffffff+fff**4fff+ffffff+fff......ffffffffffffffffffffffffflfffflffffflffff . OTHER DIRECT COSTS DETAIL ACTUAL I'lULTI ITEM DESCRr~TION ODC ODe ---------------- --------- ------- ----- T-R,WtlIlU !..EA6E $0 to so r~LEPHOIE :Iong distance only} 50 SO 50 POST~tt 20 20 20 REPQQD.!PRINTIHS 50 50 SO PERMiT FEES 0 0 0 ------ ---- --- ----- ------ ------- SUBiaTAl DIREC; $ t120 to $0 $0 $120 SUBTOTAL ~UlT DIR $ 5120 SO SO SO S120 ffffilffffffffff'ffffffffffffffffff'ffffff""'ffffffff,fffff.ffffflflffff..ff.lflffff+ffl.....fff..fff.fflff.f.f..ff.f.ffffff.fffff.ff EXTERNAL ASSOCIATES COST DETAIL ASSDC!A TE --------- --------- -------- S~~UCTyRAl TECHNOLOGIES INC. $6')0 5bOO ------ ------ .----- ------ ------ b'~ $,) SO Si) '600 ..~..~tt+.~.~ftff.f4.t+tt4*'*+ft.'~.ft*tf.f.ff4f'ft.ff+ff+f+ffffffffffffffffffffl'fffffffffl"ffffff&ff*fffffffffflfflfflfffflfflfff.4' -:-.~_ _~~C~, ::{'3 ~ ::.:;~~- ~:::::j;:: . ~ . ... s.' SC SO Cl,'19 S6,1I7 'e,. . '.' - ~rg~~ AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES for SANITARY ENGINEERING SERVICES Consultant: Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc. Date: July 1991 ">1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Paqe I. Definitions; General Considerations 1 II. General Duties of Consultant 3 III. Duties of Consultant; Study and Report Phase through Construction Phase and Resident Project Representative Services Phase 4 A. Phase I - Study and Report Phase 4 B. Phase II - Preliminary Design Phase 5 c. Phase III - Final Design Phase 6 D. Phase IV -Bidding/Negotiation Phase 7 E. Phase V - Contract Phase 8 F. Phase VI - Resident Project Representative Services 11 Phase IV. Data and Services to be Provided by City 15 V. Time of Performance 16 VI. Agreement Period 16 VII. Compensation 16 VIII.Payment 19 IX. Miscellaneous provisions 19 A. Ownership of Documents 19 B. Copies of Documents 20 C. Insurance 20 D. Litigation Services 22 E. Authority to Contract 22 F. Assignment 23 G. Confidential Information 23 H. Non-Exclusive Contract 23 I. Sub-Consultants 24 J. Notices 24 K. Attachments 24 L. Truth-In Negotiation certificate 24 M. Records 25 N. Personnel 25 o. Equal Opportunity Employment; Non-Discrimination 25 P. Prohibition Against Contingent Fees 25 Q. Termination 26 R. Indemnification 26 S. Interest of the Consultant 27 T. Compliance with Laws 27 u. Jurisdiction; Venue 27 " ''^^-.-.- _._--,...._.--~--- - TABLE OF CONTENTS cont. Paqe v. Attorney's Fees 27 W. Internal Disputes Between Owner and Consultant 28 x. Project Scheduling 28 Y. Extent of Agreement 28 Exhibit A: Service Authorization(s) (sample) B: Hourly Rate Chart (sample) C: Invoice (sample) " ,~ - AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of , 19 , by and between the CITY of Delray Beach, Florida, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Professional Enqineerinq Consultants. Inc. , hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY has provided notice of the desired professional services and carried out the proper selection process pursuant to and in accordance with the Consultants competative Negotiation Act, and; WHEREAS, the CITY represents that it is a Florida Municipal corporation with the authority to engage the CONSULTANT and accept the obligation for payment for the services desired, and; WHEREAS, the CITY desires to engage the CONSULTANT to perform certain professional services pertinent to such work in accordance with this AGREEMENT and with SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS to be issued at the time of or subsequent to execution of this AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT shall provide such professional services in accordance with this AGREEMENT and SERVICE AUTHORIZATION(S). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits which will accrue to the parties hereto in carrying out the terms of this AGREEMENT, it is mutually understood and agreed as follows: I. DEFINITIONS: GENERAL CONDITIONS A. THE SCOPE OF WORK is to be implemented as set forth by this AGREEMENT and by SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS, which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, and as also may. be added as approved by the CITY from time to time. B. A SERVICE AUTHORIZATION is a form to be used to authorize work, projects, and services. The form shall be executed by the CITY'S and CONSULTANT'S representatives. A CITY purchase order number shall be identified on the form. The purchase order 1 --. - authorization is established in the CITY Code of Ordinances with provisions for expenditure level of approval authorizations. A sample form of the service authorization is attached as Exhibit "A" to this AGREEMENT. The projects; work and services to be performed by the CONSULTANT and time for comple- tion of the particular phase of the work by CONSUL- TANT shall be authorized by a SERVICE AUTHORIZATION. The SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall include the scope of work to be performed; the budget cost, complete with an itemization of manhours, wage rates, reimbursable expenses, and other related costs; schedule for completion and name of project manager. The SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall be signed by the CITY and the CONSULTANT'S authorized representative. A City purchase order shall be issued with authorization identify ing funds and amount of expenditures. The terms of this AGREEMENT supersede the terms stated on the purchase order. C. CONSTRUCTION COSTS shall be the total estimated cost to the CITY of all elements of the project designed or specif ied by the CONSULTANT. Construction costs shall include the cost at current market rates of labor and materials furnished by the Contractor and equipment designed, specified, selected or specially provided for by the CONSULTANT, plus a reasonable allowance for the contractor's overhead and profit. In addition, a reasonable allowance for contingencies shall be included for market conditions at the time of bidding and for changes in the work during con- struction. Construction cost does not include the compensation of the CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT'S subconsultants, the cost of the land, rights-of-way, financing or other costs which are the responsibility of the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall use its best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry in estimating the construction cost. D. PHASES: A phased approach may be utilized. The CITY and the CONSULTANT shall have the right to negotiate the terms of each phase as contained within each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, and to reject any SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, if the parties cannot agree to the terms of the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION. In the event the parties cannot agree, the CITY may select another proposer or go out for additional proposals in order to complete the subsequent phase(s) of the project. This phased approach shall not waive the CITY'S right to terminate the CONSULTANT'S contract during any phase of the project. 2 " ,~ - II. GENERAL DUTIES OF CONSULTANT A. The relationship of the CONSULTANT to the CITY will be that of a professional CONSULTANT, and the CONSUL- TANT will provide the professional and technical services required under this AGREEMENT in accordance with acceptable professional practices and ethical standards. No employer/employee relationships shall be deemed to be established and the CONSULTANT, its agents, subcontractors, and employees shall be independent contractors at all times. B. Professional and Technical Services. It shall be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to work with the CITY and apprise it of solutions to problems and the approach or technique to be used towards accomplish- ment of the CITY'S objectives as set forth in SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS, which will be made a part of this AGREEMENT upon execution by both parties. C. The scope of services to be provided shall be covered in detail in SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS. D. The CITY shall establish a budget for each project awarded to CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for providing, at no additional cost to the CITY, new designs, drawings, specifications, reports and other applicable services if the budget for the entire project is exceeded during and up to completion of the final design phase of the project; however, nothing contained herein shall require the CONSULTANT to bear additional costs if the additional costs are a result of a change in the scope of services directed by the CITY. E. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the profes- sional quality, technical accuracy, timely comple- tion, compliance with regulations and rules, and the coordination with all appropriate agencies of all designs, drawings, specifications, reports and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT. If the CITY determines there are any errors, omissions or other deficiencies in the CONSULTANT'S designs, drawings, specifications, reports and other services, the CONSULTANT shall, wi thout additional compensation, correct or revise said errors or omissions to the satisfaction of the CITY. F. Approval by the CITY of drawings, designs, specifica- tions, reports 3nd incidental professional services or materials fULnished hereunder shall not in any way relieve the CONSULTANT of responsibility for the 3 - technical adequacy of its work. The CITY'S review, approval or acceptance of, or payment for, any of the services shall not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights under this AGREEMENT or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this AGREEMENT. G. The CONSULTANT designates Tom R. Kelley, P.E., as its representative to act as liaison with the CITY. The representative shall manage and coordinate CITY projects and is hereby authorized to act on behalf of the CONSULTANT to negotiate and approve SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS and act on any other related matter with respect to performance of services for the CITY in accordance with the AGREEMENT. Any change to name another person shall be requested in writing to the CITY, and shall be approved by the CITY. H. CONSULTANT shall attend all meetings, as specified or as defined in each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION of the CITY Commission or any CITY approval Board, where the project is discussed, unless the City's representa- tive declares such attendance and participation is not necessary. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall attend all additional meetings as may be required to facilitate the project. III. DUTIES OF CONSULTANT; STUDY AND REPORT PHASE THROUGH CONSTRUCTION PHASE AND RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES PHASE The following Duties of CONSULTANT are separated into phases of the project which if approved via SERVICE AUTHORIZA- TIONS shall be performed by the CONSULTANT. The CITY may require SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS which contain additional re- quirements applicable to the project. The CITY must authorize through SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS, the commencement of each phase of the work. A. Phase I - Study and Report Phase If the Study and Report Phase is authorized, the following requirements shall apply. (1) The CONSULTANT shall consult with the CITY to clarify and define the CITY I S requirements for the Project and review available data. (2) The CONSULTANT shall advise the CITY as to the necessity of the CITY I S providing or obtaining from others, data or services. 4 " ,~ - (3) The CONSULTANT shall identify and analyze permit and approval requirements of all governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project and participate in consultations with such authorities. (4) The CONSULTANT shall provide analyses of the CITY'S needs, planning surveys, site evaluations and comparative studies of prospective sites and solutions. (5) The CONSULTANT shall provide a general economic analysis of Owner's requirements applicable to various alternatives. (6) The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Report containing schematic layouts, sketches and conceptual design criteria with appropriate exhibits to indicate clearly the considerations involved (including applicable requirements of governmen- tal authorities having jurisdiction as afore- said) and the alternative solutions available to the CITY and setting forth CONSULTANT'S findings and recommendations. This Report will be accompanied by CONSULTANT'S pre-design estimate of probable costs for the Project, including, but not limited to the following which will be separately itemized: Construction Cost, allow- ance for engineering costs and contingencies allowances for such other items, such as charges of all other professionals and consultants, for the cost of land and rights-of-way, for compensation for or damages to properties, and for permit, review and/or approval fees by other governmental agencies, if required. The CONSUL- TANT shall also provide a preliminary evaluation of the City's Project Schedule. The City's Project Schedule and probable construction costs shall be evaluated and updated throughout subsequent phases of the work. (7) The CONSULTANT shall furnish the number of copies of the Study and Report documents as provided in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION and review them with the CITY. B. Phase II - Preliminary Design Phase If the Preliminary Design Phase is authorized, the following requirements will apply: (1) The CONSULTANT, in consultation with the CITY shall determine the general scope, extent and character of the Project. 5 -~-_..... ..~--'-'-- - (2 ) Prepare Preliminary Design documents consisting of final design criteria, preliminary drawings, outline specifications and written descriptions of the Project. (3 ) Advise the CITY if additional data or services are necessary and assist the CITY in obtaining such data and services. (4) Furnish the specif ied number of copies of the above Preliminary Design documents as contained within the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION and present and review them with the CITY. (5) The CONSULTANT shall submit to the CITY a preliminary estimate of construction costs based - on current area, volume or other unit costs, which shall be updated throughout the design development phase. (6) The CONSULTANT shall prepare a development schedule, which shall include, but shall not be limited to, the review and approval times by all governmental agencies as may be required. (7) The CONSULTANT shall make available all design calculatio'ns and associated Data, and partici- pate in meetings in which Value Engineering Analysis of the project takes place, at such times and places as shall be determined by the CITY. C. Phase III. Final Design Phase. If the Final Design Phase is authorized, the following requirements shall apply: (1) The CONSULTANT shall prepare construction documents which shall include but not be limited to drawings and technical specifications, general and supplementary conditions, bid forms, invitations to bid, instructions to bidders, with technical criteria, descriptions and design data necessary for permitting by governmental authorities, and shall include any further adjustments in the scope or quality of the project or in the construction budget authorized by the CITY. (2) The CONSULTANT shall in the preparation of construction documents, technical criteria, written descriptions and design data, take into 6 11.'1 - account all currently prevailing codes and regulations governing construction in the City of Delray Beach, Florida, and shall meet the requirements of all other agencies or govern- mental authorities having jurisdiction over the project. (3) The CONSULTANT shall prepare a detailed opinion of probable cost in accordance with paragraph I.C., which shall be reviewed by the CITY prior to going out for bids. (4) The CONSULTANT shall provide the required documents and attend meetings as necessary~ for the approval of governmental boards, agencies or authorities having jurisdiction over the project. (5) The CONSULTANT shall use bid documents provided by the CITY including bidding forms, conditions of the contract, and form of AGREEMENT between the CITY and CONTRACTOR. (6) The CONSULTANT shall prepare all documents including design and plan revisions required for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the project. Said approvals are required prior to the public notice for the Invitation to Bid and submission of applications therefore are the responsibility of the CONSULTANT. (7) The CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY the number of copies of contract documents as specified in the service authorization. D. Phase IV - Bidding/Negotiation Phase. If the bidding phase is authorized, the following requirements shall apply: (1) The CONSULTANT shall assist the CITY in obtain- ing bids or negotiated proposals, assist in awarding and preparing contracts for construc- tion, attend pre-bid conferences, prepare addenda, provide written recommendation of award, assist in the compilation/preparation of contract documents, and after the award assist the City in securing the required bonds and certificates of insurance, and in the review of the contract documents for completeness. (2) The CONSULTANT shall attend the bid opening, prepare bid tabulation sheets and assist the 7 - in CITY in evaluating bids or proposals and assembling and awarding contracts for construction, materials, equipment and services. (3 ) The CONSULTANT shall issue addenda as appro- priate to interpret, clarify or expand the Bidding Documents. (4) The CONSULTANT shall consult with and advise the CITY as to the acceptability of subcontractors, suppliers and other persons and organizations proposed by the prime contractor(s) (herein called CONTRACTOR(S)) for those portions of the work as to which such acceptability is required by the Bidding Documents. (5) Consult with the CITY concerning and determine the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by CONTRACTOR(S) when substi- tution prior to the award of contracts is allowed by the Bidding Documents. E. Phase V - Construction Phase If Contract Administration is authorized, the follow- ing requirements shall apply: (1) The CONSULTANT shall provide administration of the contract for construction as set forth herein and as contained within the general conditions of the contract for construction. (2) The CONSULTANT shall be a representative of and shall advise and consult with the CITY during construction and until final payment to the contractor is due. The CONSULTANT shall have authority to act on behalf of the CITY only to the extent provided in this AGREEMENT and as provided in the contract for construction unless otherwise modified by written instrument. (3) The CONSULTANT shall visit the site at regular intervals appropriate to the stage of construc- tion or as otherwise agreed. to by the CITY and the CONSULTANT, in writing, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work completed and shall determine in general if the work is being performed in a manner indicat- ing that the work when completed will be in accordance with the contract documents. The CONSULTANT shall be required to make on-site observations to review the work. The CONSULTANT shall keep the CITY informed of the progress and quality of the work and shall provide certifi- 8 . - cation to the CITY of satisfactory completion of all phases of the work in compliance with the plans, specifications, and/or approved changes or modifications thereto. (4) The CONSULTANT shall not have control over or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, since these are solely the CONTRACTOR'S responsibility under the contract for construction. The CONSULTANT shall make every reasonable effort to ensure that the CONTRACTOR completes the work in accordance with the current approved schedule and carries out the work in . accordance with the Contract documents. (5) The CONSULTANT based on observations and evalua- tions of CONTRACTOR'S applications for payment, shall review and certify the amounts due the CONTRACTOR. (6) The CONSULTANT'S certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the CITY, based on the CONSULTANT'S observations at the site as provided herein and on the data comprising the CONTRACTOR'S application for payment, that the work has progressed to the point indicated and that, to the best of the CONSULTANT'S knowledge, information, and belief, the quality and quanti- ty of the work is in accordance with the con- tract documents. The foregoing representations are subject to an evaluation of the work for conformance with the contract documents upon substantial completion, to results of subsequent tests and inspections, to minor deviations from the contract documents, correctable prior to completion and to specific qualifications expressed by the CONSULTANT. The issuance of the certificate of payment shall further consti- tute a representation that the CONSULTANT has made observations to review the quality or quantity of the work. (7) The CONSULTANT shall recommend disapproval or rejection of CONTRACTOR'S work to the CITY which does not conform to the contract documents. The CONSULTANT will have authority to require additional inspection or testing of the work in accordance with the provisions of the contract documents, whether or not such work is fabricated, installed or completed. 9 -"---.- - (8) The CONSULTANT shall review and approve or take other appropriate action upon CONTRACTOR'S submittals such as shop drawings, product data, and samples for the purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the contract docu- ments. The CONSULTANT shall evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by CONTRACTORS. (9) The CONSULTANT shall prepare change orders and constructicm change directives with supporting documentation and data if deemed necessary by the CONSULTANT, for the CITY'S approval and execution in accordance with the contract documents, and may authorize minor changes in the work not involving an adjustment in the contract sum or an extension of the contract time which is consistent with the intent of the contract documents. (10) The CONSULTANT shall conduct inspections to determine the date or dates of substantial completion and the date of final completion, shall receive and forward to the CITY for the CITY'S review and records, written warranties and related documents required by the contract documents and assembled by the CONTRACTOR and shall issue a final certificate for payment upon compliance with the requirements of the contract documents. (11) The CONSULTANT shall interpret matters concern- ing performance of the CITY and CONTRACTOR under the requirements of the contract documents on written request of either the CITY or CONTRACTOR. The CONSULTANT'S response to such requests shall be made with reasonable prompt- ness and within any time limits agreed upon. (12) Interpretations of the CONSULTANT shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the contract documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations, the CONSULTANT shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by both the CITY and the Contractor. (13) The CITY shall be the final arbiter on matters relating to aesthetics. 10 ".~ - (14) The CONSULTANT shall render written interpreta- tions within a reasonable time on all interna-l disputes between the CITY and CONTRACTOR relat- ing to the execution of the progress of the work as provided in the contract documents. (15) The CONSULTANT'S interpretations on internal disputes are not binding on the CITY and the CITY may result to remedies afforded by this contract to resolve the issue. (16) The CONSULTANT shall provide the number of sets of the construction documents to the CONTRACTOR as specified in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION. (17) Upon completion of construction the CONSULTANT shall provide to the CITY, three sets of record drawings, signed and sealed, plus one set of mylars incorporating as built conditions and other data furnished by contractor(s) to CONSULTANT. (18) In company with the city, the CONSULTANT shall visit the Project to observe any apparent defects in the completed construction, assist the CITY in consultations and discussions with CONTRACTOR(S) concerning correction of such deficiencies, and make recommendations as to replacement or correction of defective work. F. Phase VI - Resident Project Representative Services Phase If the Resident Project Representative Services Phase is authorized the following requirements shall apply: A. A Resident Project Representative will be assigned to assist CONSULTANT in carrying out his responsibilities to CITY at the site. Resident Project Representative is CONSULTANT'S agent at site, will act as directed by and under the supervision of CONSULTANT, and will confer with CONSULTANT regarding Resident Representa- tive's actions. Resident Representative's dealing in matters pertaining to the on-site work shall in general be with CONSULTANT and CONTRACTOR keeping the CITY advised as neces- sary. Resident Project Representative's deal- ings with subcontractors shall only be through or with the full knowledge and approval of CONTRACTOR. Resident Project Representative shall generally communicate with the CITY with the knowledge of and under the direction of CONSULTANT. 11 . Representative B. Resident Project shall where applicable: 1- Review the progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing submittals and schedule of values prepared by CONTRACTOR and consult with CONSULTANT concerning its general acceptability. 2. Attend meetings with CONTRACTOR, such as preconstruct ion conferences, progress meetings, job conferences and other proj ect-related meetings, and prepare and circulate copies of minutes thereof. 3. Working principally through. CONTRACTOR'S superintendent, assist CONSULTANT in serving as the City's liaison with CONTRAC- TOR, when CONTRACTOR'S operations affect the CITY'S on-site operations. 4. Assist in obtaining from the CITY addition- al details or information, when required for proper execution of the Work. 5. Record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and samples. 6. Receive samples which are furnished at the site by CONTRACTOR, and notify the CONSUL- TANT of availability of samples for exami- nation. 7. Advise the CONSULTANT and CONTRACTOR of the commerlcement of any Work requiring a Shop Drawing if the submittal has not been approved by the CONSULTANT. 8. Conduct on-site observations of the Work in progress to assist the CONSULTANT in determining if the Work is, in general, proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. 9. Report to the CONSULTANT whenever Residen- tial Project Representative believes that any Work is unsatisfactory, faulty or defective or does not conform to the Contract Documents, or has been damaged, or does not meet the requirements of any inspection, test or approval required to be made; and advise the CONSULTANT of Work that Resident Project Representative 12 ".'1 - believes should be uncovered for observa- tion, or requires special testing, inspec- tion or approval. Nothing herein shall relieve the CONTRACTOR or the CONSULTANT from the duties imposed by the contract. 10. Verify that tests, equipment and systems startups, and operating and maintenance training are conducted in the presence of appropriate personnel, and that CONTRACTOR maint;::..ins adequate records thereof; and observe, record and report to the CONSUL- TANT appropriate details relative to the test procedures and startups. II. Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies having jurisdic- tion over the Project, record the results of these inspections and report to the CONSULTANT. 12. Report to CONSULTANT when clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Docu- ments are needed and transmit to CONTRACTOR clarifications and interpretations as issued by the CONSULTANT. 13. Consider and evaluate CONTRACTOR'S sugges- tions for modifications in Drawings or Specifications and report with Resident Project Representative's recommendations to the CONSULTANT. Transmit to CONTRACTOR decisions as issued by the CONSULTANT. 14. Maintain at the job site orderly files for correspondence, reports of job conferences, Shop Drawings and samples, reproductions of original Contract Documents including all Work Directive Changes, Addenda, change Orders, Field Orders, additional Drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the Contract, CONSULTANT'S clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents, progress reports, and other Project related documents. 15. Keep a diary or log book, recording CON- TRACTOR hours on the job site, weather conditions, data relative to questions of Work Directive Changes, Change Orders or changed conditions, list of job site visitors, daily activities, decisions, observations in general, and specific 13 - observations in more detail as in the case of observing test procedures; and send copies to the CONSULTANT. 16. Record all names, addresses and telephone numbers of the CONTRACTOR, all subcontrac- tors and major suppliers of material and equipment. 17. Furnish the CONSULTANT periodic reports as required of progress of the Work of the CONTRACTOR's compliance with the progress schedule and schedule of Shop Drawing and sample submittals. 18. Consult with the CONSULTANT in advance of schedule major tests, inspections or start of important phases of the Work. 19. Draft proposed Change Orders and Work Directive Changes, obtaining backup materi- al from CONTRACTOR and recommend to the CONSULTANT, Change Orders, Work Directive Changes, and Field Orders. 20. Report immediately to the CONSULTANT and the CITY upon the occurrence of any acci- dent. 21- Review applications for payment with CONTRACTOR for compliance with the estab- lished procedure for their submission and forward with recommendations to the CONSUL- TANT, noting particularly the relationship of the payment requested to the schedule of values, Work completed and materials and equipment delivered at the site but not incorporated in the Work. 22. During the course of the work, verify that certificates, maintenance and operation manuals and other data required to be assembled and furnished by CONTRACTOR are applicable to the items actually installed and in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments, and have this material delivered to the CONSULTANT for review and forwarding to CITY prior to final payment for the Work. 23. Before the CONSULTANT issues a Certificate of Substantial Completion, submit to CONTRACTOR a list of observed items requir- ing completion or correction. 14 " ,~ . 24. Conduct final inspection in the company of the CONSULTANT, the CITY and the CONTRACTOR and prepare a final list of items to be completed or corrected. 25. Observe that all items on final list have been completed or corrected and make recommendations to the CONSULTANT concern- ing acceptance. C. The Resident Project Representative shall not: 1- Authorize any deviation from the Contract Documents or substitution of materials or equipment. 2. Exceed limitations of the CONSULTANT'S authority as set forth in the Contract Documents. 3. Undertake any of the responsibilities of CONTRACTOR, subcontractors, or CONTRACTOR's superintendent. 4. Advise on, issue directions relative to or assume control over any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction unless such advice or directions are specifically required by the Contract Documents. 5. Advise on, issue directions regarding or assume control over safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work. 6. Accept Shop Drawing or sample submittals from anyone other than CONTRACTOR. 7. Authorize the CITY to occupy the Project in whole or in part. 8. Participate in specialized field or labora- tory tests or inspections conducted by others except as specifically authorized by the CONSULTANT. IV. DATA AND SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY The CITY shall provide the following: A. Furnish or cause to be furnished such reports, studies, instruments, documents, and other information as the CONSULTANT and CITY mutually 15 -.-.-.- - deem necessary and which are under control of the CITY. B. Other data and services to be agreed upon in subsequent SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS. C. Pay for all legal advertisements incidental to obtaining bids or proposals from contractors. D. The City Manager or his designee shall act as the CITY'S representative with respect to the work to be performed under this AGREEMENT. The city Manager or his designee shall have the authority to the extent authorized by the City Charter and Code. of Ordinances to exercise the rights and responsibilities of the CITY provided in this contract. said authority may include but is not limited to: transmit instructions, stop work, receive information, interpret CITY'S policies and decisions with respect to materi- als, equipment, elements, and systems pertinent to the services covered by this AGREEMENT. E. Pay all permit application filing fees. F. Provide access to CITY facilities. V. TIME OF PERFORMANCE A. The CONSULTANT will begin work promptly after issuance of a notice to proceed. B. The CONSULTANT'S services called for under the AGREEMENT shall be completed in accordance with the schedule contained in each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION. If the CONSULTANT'S services are unreasonably delayed by the CITY in excess of 180 days, the time of perfor- mance and compensation shall be renegotiated, provid- ed; however, the CONSULTANT as a condition precedent to renegotiation shall notify the CITY within fifteen (15) calendar days from the end of the delay of CONSULTANT'S proposed additional costs incurred by reason of said delay. VI. AGREEMENT PERIOD The period of service is from the date of execution of this AGREEMENT until such time as all outstanding SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS issued have been completed. Each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall delineate a time for completion of the service to be rendered. 16 ",W VII. COMPENSATION A. The CITY will compensate the CONSULTANT for the services performed on each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION in accordance with a negotiated lump sum, or a not to exceed budgeted amount based on time charges which are based upon hourly rates, plus reimbursable expenses if compensation is based on Method II and other related costs as are specified in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION. 1. METHOD 1 - LUMP SUM Lumo Sum Amount. Wherever possible, the scope of services for Services, Projects or Programs shall be thoroughly defined and outlined prior to its authorization. The CITY and CONSULTANT shall mutually agree to a lump sum amount for services to be rendered and a detailed scope of services. Should the CITY deem that a change in the scope of services is appropriate, then a decrease or increase in compensation shall be authorized in writing. In lump sum contracts, the CONSULTANT shall submit the estimated man hours, wage rates and other actual unit costs supporting the compensation. The CONSULTANT shall submit a truth in negotiation certificate stating that all data supporting the compensa- tion is accurate, complete and current at the time of contracting. 2. METHOD II - TIMES CHARGES! NOT TO EXCEED BUDGET- ED AMOUNT Comoutation of Time Charqes !Not to Exceed Amount. When a service is to be compensated for on a time charge/not to exceed basis, the CONSULTANT will submit a not to exceed budget cost to the CITY for prior approval based on actual time charges which shall not exceed established hourly rates as shown in Exhibit B attached hereto, plus reimbursable expenses and other related costs. The CITY shall not be obligated to reimburse the CONSULTANT for costs incurred in excess of the not to exceed cost amount. a. The CITY agrees to pay the CONSULTANT compensation for services rendered based upon the established raw hourly salary rates as shown in Exhibit B for services rendered on CITY projects multiplied by an overhead factor containing a ten percent 17 ~ (10%) profit, which shall not exceed 3.0. The overhead factor may be subject to audit. The schedule of hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit B is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The rates listed in Exhibit B may be adjusted upon AGREEMENT of the parties. b. In addition, the CITY shall pay for reim- bursa~Jle expenses invoiced at the actual cost of expenditures incurred by the CONSULTANT if provided in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION as follows: (1) Actual expense of transportation and lOdging in accordance with CITY policy in effect at the time of travel when traveling in connection with each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, express courier charges, and permit fees paid for assisting the CITY in securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the project. (2) Actual expense of reproductions of Drawings and specifications including duplicate sets of the completion of each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION for the CITY'S review and approval. (3) Actual expenses of testing, laboratory services, and field equipment. (4) Actual expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, when authorized by the CITY. (5) Actual expense of Auto Travel at the established CITY rate per mile for travel outside Palm Beach County. B. Subcontractual service shall be invoiced at the actual fees paid by the CONSULTANT, plus an addition- al ten percent (10%) of the cost of these services to compensate CONSULTANT, for the procuring and manage- ment of the sub-consultant, and for the other financial and administrative costs. Subcontractual 18 'I ,~ - services shall be approved by the CITY in writing prior to performance of the subcontractual work. C. Total Compensation (including, but not limited to compensation for sub-consultants) for all services and expenses shall not exceed the budget cost listed upon each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, without written approval. D. If the CITY determines that any price for services, however calculated provided by the CONSULTANT, including profit, negotiated in connection with this AGREEMENT or any cost reimbursable under this AGREE- MENT was increased by any significant sums because the CONSULTANT or any subcontractor furnished incom- plete or inaccurate costs or pricing data, then such price or cost or profit shall be reduced accordingly and the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall be reduced accordingly and the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall be modified in writing to reflect such reduction. VIII.PAYMENT The CITY agrees that it will use its best effort to pay the CONSULTANT within thirty (30) calendar days from presentation of the CONSULTANT'S itemized report and invoice and approval of the CITY'S representative, unless additional time for processing is required for payments for basic services, subcontractual services, and reimburs- able expenses as defined in section VII. The CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices, as required in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, which shall include a report of work completed during the respective invoice period. Invoices shall be in a format consistent with those shown in Exhibit C. The report shall be adequate in detail to describe work progress (% complete for each task) and written summaries of work completed. No payment request shall exceed the value of work and services performed by the CONSULTANT under the SERVICE AUTHORIZATION. IX. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. Ownershio of Documents: A set of reproducible mylar drawings, and C.A.D. disks in a format compatible with CITY" S Computer system, shall be given to the CITY. Details, design calculations, and all other documents and plans that result from the CONSULTANT'S SERVICES under this AGREEMENT shall become and remain the property of the CITY, including patent and copyright rights, whether the project is completed or not, and will be delivered to the CITY upon demand. CONSULTANT reserves the right to retain a copy of all such 19 - documents for record purposes. Where such documents are required to be filed with governmental agencies, the CONSULTANT will furnish copies to the CITY upon request. The contract work is represented by hard copy documentation; software, is provided to the CITY for convenience only. B. Copies of Documents: The CONSULTANT shall prepare sufficient copies of all documents necessary to obtain approval through the CITY'S processes, as well as other governmental authorities. See also section III (C) (7) for addi- tional requirements. The CITY acknowledges that the materials cited in Paragraph IX A. and other data provided in connection with this AGREEMENT which are provided by the CONSULTANT are not intended for use in connection with any project other than the project for which such materials are prepared. Any use by the CITY of such materials in connection with a project other than that for which such materials were prepared without prior written consent and adaptation by the CONSULTANT shall be at the CITY'S sole risk, and the CONSULTANT shall have no responsibility or liability therefore. C. Insurance: without limiting any of the other obligations or liabilities of the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall, at his own expense, provide and maintain in force, until all of its services to be performed under this AGREEMENT have been completed and accepted by the CITY (or for such duration as it otherwise specified hereinafter), the following insurance coverages: 1. Worker's compensation Insurance to apply to all of the CONSULTANT'S employees in compliance with the "Worker's compensation Law" of the State of Florida and all applicable Federal Laws. A. Employer's Liability with limits of $100,000 per person, $500,000 per occur- rence and $100,000 per each disease. 2. Comprehensive General Liability with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence combined single limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. Coverage must be afforded on a form no more restrictive than the latest edition of the Comprehensive General Liability policy, without 20 " ,~ - restrictive endorsements other than ISO Endorse- ment GL 21 06 (Engineers, Architects, or Survey- ors Professional Liability exclusion), as Filed by the Insurance Services Office and must include: a. Premises and/or Operations b. Independent Contractors c. Products and Completed Operations - CONSUL- TANTS shall maintain in force until at least three years after completion of all services required under this AGREEMENT, coverage for Products and Completed Opera- tions, including Broad Form Property Damag(-~ . d. Broad Form Property Damage e. Contractual Coverage applicable to this specific AGREEMENT. f. Personal Injury Coverage with minimum limits of coverage equal to those required for Bodily Injury Liability. 3. Business Automobile Liability with minimum limits of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) per occurrence combined single limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. Coverage must be afforded on a form no more restrictive than the latest edition of the Business Automobile Liability policy, without restrictive endorsements, as filed by the Insurance Services Office and must include: a. Owned Vehicles b. Hired and Non-Owned Vehicles c. Employers' Non-Ownership 4. Professional Liability Insurance with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) occurrence. Coverage shall be afforded on a form acceptable to the CITY. CONSULTANT shall maintain such professional liability insurance until at least one year after a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 21 --.-----~,'--- ~'-' - 5. Prior to commencement of services, the CONSUL- TANT shall provide to the CITY Certificates of Insurance evidencing the insurance coverage specif ied in the foregoing Paragraphs Cl, C2, C3, C4. All policies covered within subpara- graphs Cl, C2, C3, C4, shall be endorsed to provide the CITY with thirty (30) days notice of cancellation and/or restriction. The CITY shall be named as an additional insured as to CONSUL- TANT'S liability on policies referenced in subparagraph C2. The required certificates of Insurance shall not only name the types of pOlicies provided, but also shall refer specifically to this AGREEMENT and section and to the above paragraphs in accordance with which insurance is being furnished, and shall state that such insurance is as required by such paragraphs of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall also make available to the CITY a certi- fied copy of the professional liability insur- ance policy required by paragraph 4 above for the CITY'S review. Upon request, the CONSULTANT shall provide copies of all other insurance policies. 6. If the initial insurance policies required by this AGREEMENT expire prior to the completion of the services, renewal certificates of Insurance of policies shall be furnished thirty (30) days prior to the date of their expiration. For Notice of Cancellation and/or Restriction; the policies must be endorsed to provide the CITY with thirty (30) days notice of cancellation and/or restriction. 7. The CONSULTANT'S insurance, including that applicable to the CITY as an Additional Insured, shall apply on a primary basis. D. Litiqation Services: It is understood and agreed that CONSULTANT'S services include reasonable participation in litiga- tion or dispute resolution arising from this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANTS participation shall include up to 30 hours of services related to litigation or dispute resolution. Any such services in excess of 30 hours shall be an additional service. E. Authority to Contract: The CITY represents that it is a municipal corporation with the authority to engage the 22 - CONSULTANT for professional services described in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS and to accept the obligation for payment for the services described in the SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS. F. Assiqnment: The CITY and the CONSULTANT each binds itself and its successors, legal representatives, and assigns to the other party to this AGREEMENT and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such other party, in respect to all covenants of this AGREEMENT subject to budget considerations and requirements of law; and, neither the CITY nor the CONSULTANT will assign or transfer their interest in this AGREEMENT without the written consent of the other. G. Confidential Information: During all times that the CONSULTANT is employed on behalf of the CITY and at all times subsequent to the date of this contract, all discussions between the CITY and the CONSULTANT and all information developed or work products produced by the CONSULTANT during its employment and all matters relevant to the business of the CITY not otherwise being a matter of public record shall be deemed to be confidential. All such information and work product shall be protected by the CONSULTANT and shall not be revealed to other persons without the express written permis- sion of the CITY, unless mandated by order of the court. H. Non-Exclusive Contract: The CITY reserves the right to award projects to other firms pursuant to the Florida Statutes Consul- tant's Competitive Negotiations Act during the period of service of the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT agrees to cooperate with the CITY and other firms in accom- plishing work that may require joint efforts to accomplish the CITY'S goals. This cooperation, when requested by the CITY, will include but not be limited to: 1- Sharing technical information developed under contract with the CITY. 2. Joint meetings for project coordination. 3. Establish lines of communication. 23 ."" I. - Subconsultants: In the event the CONSULTANT, during the course of the work under this AGREEMENT requires the services of any subcontractors or other professional associates in connection with services covered by this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT must secure the prior written approval of the CITY. J. Notices: Whenever either party desires to give notice unto the other, it must be given by written notice, sent by registered united States mail, with return receipt requested, addressed to the party for whom it is intended at the place last written, as the place for giving of notice in compliance with the provisions of this paragraph. For the present, the parties desig- nate the following as the respective places of giving of notice to wit: city of Delrav Beach City Manager City of Delray Beach, Florida 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 CONSULTANT Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc. 220 Congress Park Drive, suite 232 Delray Beach, Fl 33445 K. Attachments: Request for Qualifications is hereby incorporated within and made an integral part of this AGREEMENT. L. Truth-In-Neqotiation certificate: Signature of this AGREEMENT by CONSULTANT shall act as the execution of a truth in negotiation certifi- cate stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation of this AGREEMENT are accurate, complete, and current. The original contract price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the CITY determines' the contract price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. 24 ~ M. Records: Records of all expenses relative to each SERVICE AUTHORIZATION shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis and shall be available to the CITY or its authorized representative at mutually conve- nient times. N. Personnel: The CONSULTANT represents that it has or will secure, at its own expense, qualified personnel required in performing the services under this AGREEMENT. All work shall be performed under the direction of a professional, registered under the State of Florida in the field for which he is responsible for perform- ing such services. The project manager shall be approved by the CITY under each SERVICE AUTHORIZA- TION. Key project personnel will be identified for each project and expected to perform the work assign- ment as can reasonably be expected, and as approved by the CITY. o. Eaual Opportunity Emplovment: Non-Discrimination: CONSULTANT agrees that it will not discriminate against employees or applicants for employment because of race, creed, color, religion, sex, age, handicapped status or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruit- ment advertising; lay-off or termination; rates of payor other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth this non-discrimination clause. This provision applies to all CONSULTANT'S subcontractors and it is the responsibility of CONSULTANT to ensure subcontractor's compliance. P. Prohibition Aaainst continaent Fees: The CONSULTANT warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this AGREEMENT, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any persons, company, corpora- tion, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT any fee, commission, percentage,.gift, or any other considera- tion, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this AGREEMENT. 25 Q. -Termination: This AGREEMENT may be terminated by either party by seven (7) calendar days prior written notice, in the event of substantial failure to perform in accordance with the terms hereof by the other party through no fault of the terminating party. The CONSULTANT and the CITY shall also have a right to terminate this AGREEMENT for convenience at any time by thirty (30) calendar days written notice to either one or the other. In the event the project described in any SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, or the services of the CONSUL- TANT called for under any SERVICE AUTHORIZATION, is or are suspended, canceled, or abandoned by the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall be given five days prior written notice of such action and shall be compensated for the professional services provided and reimbursable expenses incurred up to the date of suspension, cancellation or abandonment. The CONSULTANT agrees to provide all documents to the CITY (specifically those referenced in paragraph IX.A. Further, prior to the CONSULTANT'S destruction of any of the above- referenced documents, the CITY shall be notified and allowed a reasonable period to gain access to and make copies of any such documents. Upon any termina- tion of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT agrees that it shall use its best efforts to work harmoniously with any successor who enters an AGREEMENT to provide services for the CITY in order to provide for a smooth transition period. R. Indemnification: The CONSULTANT will at all times indemnify, save and hold harmless and defend the CITY, its officers, agents (the term agents shall not include the contractor(s), any subcontractors, any materialmen or others who have been retained by the City or Contractor, or materialmen to supply goods or services to the project) and employees, from and against all liability, any claim, demand, damage, loss, expense or cause of action and costs (including attorney's fees at trial or appellate levels) arising out of error, omission, or negligent act of CONSULTANT, its agents, servants or employees in the performance of services under this agreement. The CONSULTANT further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the ci ty, its officers, agents and employees from and against any claim, demand or cause of action arising out of any negligence or misconduct of CONSULTANT for which the city, its agents, servants or employees are alleged to be liable. The indemnifications contained herein shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. 26 "," - The monetary limitation on the extent of the CONSULTANT' S liability shall be one million dollars ($1,000,000.00). Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall be deemed to affect the rights, privileges and immunities of the CITY as set forth in Florida Statutes 768.28. S. Interest of the Consultant: The CONSULTANT covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in any Project to which this AGREEMENT pertains or any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. The CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of this AGREEMENT, no person having such interest shall be employed. T. Compliance with Laws: a. The CONSULTANT shall comply with the applicable requirements of State and applicable County laws and all Codes and Ordinances of the CITY OF DELRAY BEACH as amended from time to time, and that exist at the time of building permit issuance. b. For SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS involving work under Federal or State Grantors or Approving Agencies, the CITY and the CONSULTANT shall review and approve the applicable required provisions or any other supplemental provisions as may be included in each SERVICE AUTHORIZATIONS. U. Jurisdiction: Venue: The CONSULTANT hereby covenants, consents and yields to the jurisdiction of the State civil Courts of Palm Beach County, Florida. Any dispute between CONSUL- TANT and the CITY shall be governed by the laws of Florida with venue in Palm Beach County Court. V. Attornev's Fees: ! In the event a suit is filed in court arising out of this agreement, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party all costs incurred, including reasonable attorney's fees, including attorney's fees and costs on appeal. 27 W. Internal Dis?ute Between Owner and Consultant: The ci t Manager shall be the final decision maker regarding internal disputes between CITY and CONSUL- TANT. x. Project Scheduling: CONSULTANT shall provide scheduling to the City based on the construction scheduling program PRIMAVERA and provide the CITY, within ten (10) days of the date of commencement as contained 'within the service authoriza- tion, a diskette with the proposed program schedule. During the course of the work. CONSULTANT shall provide monthly updates with a written description of any changes in the schedule. The diskette shall be in a format compatible with the CITY's computer system. Y. Extent of Aqreement: This AGREEMENT represents the entire integrated AGREEMENT between the City and the CONSULTANT and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or AGREEMENTS, written or oral. This AGREEMENT may not be amended, changed, modified, or otherwise altered in any way, at any time after the execution hereof, except by approval of the City Commission and CONSULTANT. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Mayor, and attested and its official Seal to be hereunto affixed by its city Clerk, and the CONSULTANT has hereunto set its hand and Seal the day and year first written above. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA CONSULTANT By: By: Q q~ ~i ~ MAYOR Sig ature R. Craiq Batterson. P.E. ATTEST (Print or Ty e) City Clerk Approved as to Form: witness City Attorney 28 "" ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IF CORPORATION - state of Florida County of Orange ~ BEFORE ME, the foregoing instrument, this 6/~ <Ew of 1((/1 , 199/ , was acknowledged by R. craig Batterso , on behalf of the corporation and said person executed the same freely and voluntarily for the purpose therein expressed. . WI~NESt/tY hand and ~al in the . county an~ state 19 (.; . aforesa1d th1s day of I ~r- . , /Z1 M;{6--(~ Notary P lic ( SEAr..) My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBlic- STA r MY COMMISSIOli EXPIR~: OF FLORIDA AT LARGE BONIllD THr.u HUCKLE) JMi. 0211993 B[RR Y & ASSOCIA TES ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IF AN INDIVIDUAL state of Florida County of Palm Beach I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this date before me, an officer duly authorized in the state and county named above to take acknowledgements, personally appeared , known to me to be the person in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this ~ of , 19 . Notary Public My Commission Expires: 29 -- . ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IF A PARTNERSHIP State of Florida County of Palm Beach I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this date before me, an officer duly authorized in the state and county named above to take acknowledgments, personally appeared I known to me to be the person in and who executed the foregoing instrument as a partner of I a partnership. He/She acknowleged before that he/she executed the Same as the act and deed of said partnership for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this day of I 19 . Notary Public My Commission Expires: 30 .,.'1 - EXHIBIT A (SAMPLE) Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH CONSULTING SERVICE AUTHORIZATION DATE: SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. FOR CONSULTING SERVICES CITY P.O. NO. CITY EXPENSE CODE TITLE: This Service Authorization, when executed, shall be incorporat- ed in and shall become an integral part of the Contract. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION II. SCOPE OF SERVICES III. BUDGET IV. COMPLETION DATE 31 --'-~'-'--' . This service authorization is approved contingent upon the ci ty' s acceptance of and satisfaction with the completion of the services rendered in the previous phase or as encompassed by the previous service authorization. If the city in its sole discretion is unsatisfied with the services provided in the previous phase or service authorization, the City may terminate the contract without incurring any further liability. The CONSULTANT may not commence work on any service authorization approved by the City to be included as part of the contract without a further notice to proceed. Approved by: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH: CONSULTANT: Date Date Thomas E. Lynch Mayor witness witness Attest: BEFORE ME, the foregoing instrument, this day of , 1991, Approved as to Legal was acknowledged by Sufficiency and Form on behalf of the Corporation , and said person executed the same free and voluntarily for the purpose there-in expressed. Witness my hand and seal in the County and State aforesaid this day of , 1991. Notary Public State of Florida My Commission Expires: 32 - - EXHIBIT B HOURLY RATES SCHEDULE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SANITARY ENGINEERING SERVICES Employee Category Hourly Rate Range (FY 1990-1991) Raw Rate Times ProCessionals Raw Rates 3.00 Multiplier Project Director/Officer/Principal 29.00 - 33.00 87.00 - 99.00 Sr. Project Manager 25.00 - 29.00 57.00 - 87.00 Project Manager/Sr. Engineer 18.00 - 25.00 54.00 - 75.00 Project Engineer 15.00 - 18.00 45.00 - 54.00 Staff Engineer 13.00 - 15.00 39.00 - 45.00 Junior Staff Engineer 10.00 - 13.00 30.00 - 39.00 Technicians Senior Technician/Designer 11.00 - 15.00 33.00 - 45.00 Technician/Designer 10.00 - 13.00 30.00 - 39.00 CADD Operator/Sr. Drafter 9.00 - 12.00 27.00 - 36.00 Drafter 6.00 - 9.00 18.00 - 27.00 Survey Crew (3-man) 25.00 - 33.00 75.00 - 99.00 Sr. Party Chief 13.00 - 15.00 42.00 - 45.00 Instrument Man 7.00 - 10.00 24.00 - 30.00 Rodman 5.00 - 8.00 18.00 - 24.00 OCfice Support Administration 9.00 - 13.00 27.00 - 39.00 Accounting Staff 6.00 - 15.00 18.00 - 45.00 Clerical Staff 9.00 - 12.00 27.00 - 36.00 ~ -"---..-- . . EXHIBIT C SAMPLE SAMPLE -- COST NOT TO EXCEED FORMAT INVOICE city of Delray Beach project No. Date Purchase Order No. Client Ref. No. Task Order No. Invoice No. Description of services under Task Order # . Period ending: . LABOR Class Emoloyee Name Rate Hours Amount Subtotal Labor $ EXPENSES Computer Word Processing Auto Rental Postage/Freight Air Transportation print/Reprographics Supplies Subtotal Expenses TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE $ COST SUMMARY Contract Amount $ Amount Earned This Period $ Amount Previously Earned Amount Remaining $ 34 '. .~ . .. ~ EXHIBIT C (continued) SAMPLE INVOICE -- LUMP SUM FORMAT INVOICE city of Delrav Beach Project No. Date Purchase Order No. Client Ref. No. Task Order No. Invoice No. Description of services under Task Order . Period ending . Total Fee $ % Complete $ Less Previous Billings Total Earned This Period $ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE $ 35 . ~ MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER t?1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~J: - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT/DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC. DATE: August 7, 1991 We have received a request for final payment from Data Flow Systems, Inc. in the amount of $10,256 for the Radio Telemetry project. Staff has reviewed the work and found it to be satisfactorily complete. Funding is available in the 1984 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Lift Station Telemetry (Account No. 441-5162-536-60.36). Account balance $10,256. Recommend approval of the request for final payment Data Flow Systems, Inc. in the amount of $10,256 with funding from the 1984 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Lift Station Telemetry (Account No. 441-5162-536-60.36). HI ~ - u - i ! . Agenda Item No. : AGENDA REQUEST Date: 7/')f,/Ql Request to be placed on:' xx Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: AUgURt 13. 1991 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much): Request City Commi~sion to approve final payment to DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, Inc. for the Radio Telemetry Project. Pro;ect 1191-13. Final payment is the amount $10.256.00. P.O./118429. ORDlNANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO Recommendation: Recommend City Commission to approve final payment in the amount of $10.256.00 for DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, Inc. for the Radio Telemetry Project .. Department Head Signature: a)4'ljd oa~~~7.//z~/q/ , Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: "'!" City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget Dir~tor Review (required on all iteas involving expenditure of funds): ) ~ ~~ 'r a<c Fundi g available: YES/ NO Funding alternatives: (if applicable) Account No. & Destf.i~tion: Account Balance: .l. ~<kIA..Ph f/12. ~5"',i'O -r ~/-#I(yJ'- ~.Jt-&O. ~ City Manager Review: I . tv!S r~ : to'f! Approved for agenda: ~ . E If NO tt? 1 :;.j~T4 Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: t/ ~q( Received: Action: Approved/Disapproved . . ~~~W(Q)~~~ DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC. INVOICE INVOICE PAGE DATE NO. P. O. BOX 2550 MELBOURNE, FL 32902 06-14-91 1001 1 (407) 729..:0596 SOLD Attn: Accounts Payable SHIP TO City of Delray Beach TO 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 ORDER NO. ORDER DATE CUSTOMER SALES PURCHASE SHIP VIA SHIP DATE NO. PERSON ORDER NUMBER TERMS 18429 Net 30 days QUANTITY UNIT QUANTITY QUANTITY ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION ORDERED SHIPPED BACK DRD. UNIT PRICE UNIT EXTENDED PRICE Retainage for PO# 18429 Contract 89-95 $ 10,256.00 if L, 3: N <::> 0 c:::. .. ~ CO LU Vi oQ~~t~ue accounts shall be subjt!ct ..,...... "- , ~"- ~ ,....,.s.:~' <j~ lCo',._ !.-.~ ,,;,j J: payment charges of 1 0' Ln er mOTlj'h (' 0 112 /0 U! ('V <...) Ie., J 8 % annual rate) .....- -.J ,,'.... :::::> U.J C) -, C:r: c.::: - > en ~- Pf2&tG€-~a~ Lu SALES AMOUNT MISC. CHARGES SALES TAX FREIGHT TOTAL PAYMENT REC'O BALANCE DUE $ 10,256.00 _..~--- - -- -.- ---.- -1r:if.----......--- - ,~- . . . , M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER(1'-'1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # <t 0 - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT/POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. DATE: AUGUST 8, 1991 We have received a request for final payment, in the amount of $9,997.12 from Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., for labora- tory services in conjunction with the Water Treatment Plant Expansion project. Staff has reviewed this work and found it to be satisfactorily complete. Funding is available in 1984 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Water Treatment Plant Expansion (Account No. 441-5162-536-60.76). Recommend approval of request for final payment in the amount of $9,997.12 from Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. for labora- tory services in conjunction with the Water Treatment Plant Expansion project with funding from 1984 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Water Treatment Plant Expansion (Account No. 441-5162-536-60.76) . t i' . I . Agenda I tem No.: AGENDA REQUEST Date: July 26, 1991 Request to be placed on:' XX Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: August 13. 1991 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much): Request City Commission to approve final payment for Post, Buckley. Schuh & Jerni~an. Tnr for rhp W~~pr Treatment Plant "Laboratory" in the amount of $9.997.12 - P.o. 1120309 (Auth No I13B - Budget amount $29,997.12 - Project No. 90-12 (I) ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: ~NO Draft Attached: xmv'NO Recommendation: Recommend Cit Commission to a rove final a ent to Post Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. in the amount of 9,997.12 for the Water Treatment "" Plant Expansion Proiect (Laboratory services). Department Head Signature: $/.4/{L<<,~~j} 7ht-jq/ , Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: ""!" City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget Director ~~iew (required on all iteas involving expenditure of fundsl' f.l4.(;< Fundi g available: YES/ NO Funding alternatives: (if applicable) Account No. & DeSifiption: "''if?, /'}f ,k... Account Balance: . .D. M / ' .~c- City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: C~/$/ NO f~1 Hold Until: /. , Agenda Coordinator Review: A;i~proved Received: Action: ( " , VERY PBSJ' . r POST ! A ENGINEERJNG . ~~ BUCKLEY, 51 nature Date 1., tL1{ g / PLANNING SCHUH &.. 9 ARCHITECTURE JERNIGAN, INC. 7 ,.t:.'t:;1jt:l~.:hrf1'~~r,{; I #D {J i q/ qq 7, J 2. FEBRUARY 19, 1991 Pf> tei1-t,'", I 130' C K"c hll'{~e. INVOICE NO. 04191 {L)1tS .JOB NO. 10-376.00 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH S/t!tf! ENVIRONEHENTAL SERVICES DEPARTHENT ~._ 434 SOUTH SWINTON AVENUE I t- ^ C'T' "',! rq-'s nl~r:J..\Jr. r ~O.t-t, DELRAY BEACH, FWRIDA 33444 11-'f~I=\~_'j~~~:~ ur':I.tf4\Ct::"j) 1\ t.2-- ~3 . I <:.' . .. ~ ~ [;;; L3 U \..1 l,=:, L:....) . . ATTENTION: MR. WILLIAM H. GREENWOOD ,-~lgnature --- v 1 Di.1W~ . ~~<- ;J RE: ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AUTHORIZATION #~:lB . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. q <3 . INVOICE #1 --"--- - - - . PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH THE PERIOD AUGUST 1 THRU DECEMBER 31, 1990 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- AUGUST , 1990 ------------- PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL HOURS AMOUNT TOTAL ---------------------- ----- ------- ------ PROJECT HANAGER VOORHEES, RICHARD 39.0 $1,162.59 SR. ENVIRON. ENGINEER COPELAND, CHARLES E. 4.0 134.60 SR. HVAC ENGINEER RIVAS. EMILIO 6.0 150.00 SR. ARCHITECT CAPOTORTO. DAN 4.0 130.00 SR. ELECTRICAL ENGINEER TREVIN, PEDRO 11.0 313.50 1""1 HVAC DESIGNER \.0 rz:: MAURA. SHIRLEY 3.0 40.44 ~ ~ ~ ~l ~ 0; SR. ENVIRON. DESIGNER ~7 ~ ~;~ WILSON. WALTER 1.0 16.12 r';J: ~ f5 ....>:.'. Cl ~ -.:,.- \;J ~'" SECRETARY ~';; :l6 ~;: V ANDERDRI FT, MARLENE 4.0 50. 72 ~{; ~ ~. .....1 r<tr -53 OOCUMENT CONTROL CLERK 0 ~ .~~ BARTLEY. KERENSA 5.5 41. 25 '1~ . .. ~ ----- -------- 77_5 $2,039.22 X 3.0 -------- TOTAL LABOR 6.117.66 WINTER PARK PLAZA. 1560 ORANGE AVENUE. SUITE 700, WINTER PARK. FLORJDA 32789 TEL: 407/647-7275' FAX: 407/740-8958 J. ((1N.1 ~/,-g ~ , , . . CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FEBRUARY 19, 1991 INVOICE NO. 04191 JOB NO. 10-376.00 PAGE 2 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES REPRODUCTION $28.12 TELEPHONE 6.04 BLUEPRINTS & REPRODUCTIONS 21.04 COURIER 32.35 PC COMPUTER 6.00 --------- TOTAL EXPENSES 93.55 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE AUGUST $6,211.21 ..'. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FEBRUARY 19, 1991 INVOICE NO. 04191 JOB NO. 10-376.00 PAGE 3 SEPTEMBER, 1990 --------------- PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL HOURS AMOUNT TOTAL ---------------------- ----- ------- ------ PROJECT MANAGER VOORHEES, RICHARD 32.5 $968.82 SR. ARCHITECT NEVILLE, GREGORY 1.0 19.25 SECRETARY VANDERDRIFT. ~~RLENE 4.0 50.72 BAXTER, WANDA 0.5 4.69 OOCUMENT CONTROL BARTLEY, KERENSA 3.0 22.50 ----- -------- 41.0 $1,065.98 X 3.0 -------- TOTAL LABOR 3,197.94 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES REPRODUCTION $72.05 TELEPHONE 26.91 TRANSPORTATION - LOCAL 31. 54 AUTO RENTAL 47.86 MEALS 16.73 AIR FARE 83.00 COURIER 15.30 --------- TOTAL EXPENSES 293.39 TOTAL AMOIJNT DUE SEPTEMBER $3,491. 33 "'N . CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FEBRUARY 19. 1991 INVOICE NO. 04191 JOB NO. 10-376.00 PAGE 4 OCTOBER. 1990 ------------- PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL HOURS AMOUNT TOTAL ---------------------- ----- ------- ------ PROJECT MANAGER VOORHEES. RICHARD 40.5 $1. 207.30 SR. ARCHITECT CAPOTORTO, DAN 9.0 292.50 SR. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PITCHER. WILLIAM 1.0 29.09 MARTINEZ. PAUL 11.0 177.21 SR. HVAC ENGINEER RIVAS, EMILIO 10.0 250.00 SR. ELECTRICAL ENGINEER TREVIN, PEDRO 13.0 370.50 SECRETARY VANDERDRIFT, MARLENE 2.5 31.70 BROWN, BARBARA 4.5 42.03 GENENDLIS, PAMELA 1.0 11.06 FAJET, DEBORAH 3.0 28.98 DOQJt1ENT CONTROL CLERK BARTLEY, KERENSA 4.5 33.75 ----- -------- 100.0 $2,474.12 X 3.0 -------- TOTAL LABOR $7,422.36 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES REPRODUCTION $47.08 TELEPHONE 12.32 TRANSPORTATION - LOCAL 34.79 AUTO RENTAL 38.91 MEALS 1.06 AIR FARE 143.00 --------- TOTAL EXPENSES 277 . 16 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE OafOBER $7,699.52 " ,~ : CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FEBRUARY 19. 1991 INVOICE NO. 04191 JOB NO. 10-376.00 PAGE 5 NOVEMBER, 1990 -------------- PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL HOURS AMOUNT TOTAL ---------------------- ----- ------- ------ PROJECT MANAGER VOORHEES, RICHARD 49.5 $1,475.60 SR. ARCHITECT COPELAND, CHARLES E. 2.0 65.00 SR. HVAC ENGINEER RIVAS, EMILIO 8.0 200.00 SR. ELECTRICAL ENGINEER TREVIN, PEDRO 9.0 256.50 SECRETARY VANDERDRIFI', MARLENE 2.5 31. 70 LARIVEE, ARDEN 4.0 49.52 DOCUMENT CONTROL CLERK BARTLEY, KERENSA 2.5 18.75 ----- -------- 77.5 $2,097.07 X 3.0 -------- TOTAL LABOR 6 , 291. 21 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES REPRODUCTION $10.56 TELEPHONE 28.52 TRANSPORTATION - LOCAL 33.46 AUTO RENTAL 35.72 MEALS 1.06 AIR FARE 145.00 PC COMPUTER 5.17 COURIER 22.75 PHOTOS 12.38 BLUEPRINTS 17.34 --------- TOTAL EXPENSES :311. 96 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE NOVEMBER $6,603.17 .. . CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FEBRUARY 19. 1991 INVOICE NO. 04191 JOB NO. 10-376.00 PAGE 6 DECEMBER, 1990 -------------- PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL HOURS AMOUNT TOTAL ---------------------- ----- ------- ------ PROJECT MANAGER VOORHEES, RICHARD 42.0 $1. 251. 99 SR. ARCHITECT CAPOTORTO. DAN 2.0 65.00 SR. HVAC ENGINEER RIVAS, EMILIO 12.0 300.00 SR. ELECTRICAL ENGINEER TREVIN, PEDRO 2.0 57.00 SECRETARY V ANDERDRI FT. t-lARLENE 2.0 25.36 BAXTER, WANDA 3.0 28.14 LARIVEE, ARDEN 3.0 37.14 DOCUMENT CONTROL CLERK BARTLEY. KERENSA 2.0 15.00 ----- -------- 68.0 $1. 779.63 X 3.0 -------- TOTAL LABOR 5.338.89 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES REPRODUCTION $50.00 TELEPHONE 30.00 TRANSPORTATION - LOCAL 70.00 AUTO RENTAL 78.00 MEALS 15.00 AIR FARE 390.00 PC COMPUTER 10.00 COURIER 10.00 --------- TOTAL EXPENSES 653.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE DECEMBER $5,991. 89 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE ~ rlr-----m- ----------- ...-- I/O; 0'1)1) - O-Jvj ,u,~ . ' . CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FEBRUARY 19, 1991 INVOICE NO. 04191 JOB NO. 10-376.00 PAGE 7 BUDGET AMOUNT $29,997 .12 ~ PREVIOUSLY INVOICED 0.00 ~~(J"Of)O AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE ~~__~_~____ 7 BUDGET REMAINING $0.00 f EfJ~ J U--I- p !Z.TIt'fJfuN ~e;: ... g I f) 91. / Z- - ---------------------------------- J. RICHARD VOORHEES, PROJECT MANAGER POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. " , \. ....- . \ '., , -' () -...' , .. " ,~ MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER CJ~1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~~ - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 EMERGENCY MANHOLE REPAIR/815 FOXPOINT CIRCLE (HAMLET) DATE: August 7, 1991 This item is before you to approve the emergency repair of a sinking manhole at 815 Foxpoint Circle in the Hamlet subdivision. As the sinking manhole was causing the street to collapse, the repair has been made. However, as the cost of the repair was $15,780, this item is being brought before you for formal approval. The contract for repair was awarded to D.S. Eakins, who is under contract with Palm Beach County Utilities. Funding is available in 1991 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Repair and Replacement Manholes (Account No. 447-5169-536-60.31). Account balance $173,428. Recommend approval of emergency repair of a manhole at 815 Foxpoint Circle and of the award of contract to D.S. Eakins in the amount of $15,789 with funding from 1991 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Repair and Replacement Manholes (Account No. 447-5169-536-60.31). ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden City Manager THRU: William H. Greenwood ~~. Director of Environmental Services FROM: Al Monteleone Supt. of Water/Sewer Network SUBJECT: Emergency Repairs DATE: August 7, 1991 The manhole at 815 Foxpoint Circle, in the Hamlet is sinking causing the street to collapse. This is being caused by a poqr foundation under the manhole. It is imperative that we make the necessary repairs to this manhole as soon as possible. The estimated cost is $15,780.00, funds for this project are in account #441-5169-536-60.31 and on requisition #2233. D.S. Eakins is the contractor who is under contract with Palm Beach County Utilities, Bid No. 91-073PR. Please approve the above requisition as soon as possible so that we can move forward with this project. ~~b- Al Monteleone AM: jaf File: Memos to City Manager Project #91-12.4 ~ - PI625I02 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH 8/08/91 Purchase Requisition Inquiry 13:49:50 Type information, press Enter. Requisition: Number: 0000002233 By: AL MONTELEONE Date: 080291 Reason: EMERGENCY REPAIR TO MANHOLE Status: WAITING DEPT APPROVAL Approved: By: Date: Suggested vendor: Nbr: Name: D.S. EAKINS Ship to: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Deliver by date: 080791 Comments N (Y/N) Line Quantity Unit Cost Extended Nbr (2 decimals) UOM Description (2 decimals) Cost Opt 1 1. 00 EA ESTIMATE COST TO MAKE 15780.0000 15780.00 EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO THE MANHOLE ON FOXPOINT CR. IN THE HAMLET (AS PER PALM BEACH COUNTY CONTRACT #91-073PR) Total . . 15780.00 Highlighted/protected fields indicate record has been processed or deleted. F1=Exit F2=Cancel F5=Print requisition F8=Requisition quotes F15=Account distribution Opt Q=Line item quotes Comments exist for the requisition. 09-73 SA MW KS IM II S1 KB ~ "" ~. MEMORANDUM TO: ~~YOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS ~ 1 FROM: CITY MANAGER['7v1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # <6 L- - MEETING OF AUGUST 13 I 1991 RATIFICATION OF RULES/BOARD OF CONSTRUCTION APPEALS DATE: August 7 I 1991 This item is before you to ratify the rules for the Board of Construction Appeals. The new rules were drafted for the purpose of insuring that all references refer to the Land Development Regulations instead of old Code sections. There are no significant changes in the new rules. Recommend ratification of the rules for the Board of Construction Appeals. ~ ~ . I - [ITY DF DElRAY BEA[H " CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 2()() ~W 1st AVE:"UE -. DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA 334..\4 FACSI~lILE 407/273-4755 Direct Line (407) 243-7091 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 26, 1991 TO: City Commission FROM: Susan A. Ruby, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Rules of the City of Delray Beach Board of Construction Appeals The Board of Construction Appeals has adopted rules for the Board of Construction Appeals. These rules require your ratification. There are no significant changes in the new rules. The new rules were drafted for the purpose of insuring that all references refer to the land development regulations instead of Sections of the old code. By copy of this memo to the City Manager, David Harden, our off ice~~is requesting that these rules be placed on the next available City Commission consent agenda for ratification by ~~mmiSSion. SAR:ci Attachments cc David Harden, City Manager Chairman of the Board of Construction Appeals Anita Barba, Board Secretary/Liaison ., . . - there is cause to hold an interim meeting pursuant to the requirements as set forth in Section 2.2.1(E} of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances, as amended. 2. SPECIAL MEETINGS: A special meeting may be called by the Chairman subject to compliance with the statutory notice provisions. 3. QUORUM: A quorum shall consist of five ( 5 ) votinCJ members of the Board for all actions. No z.ction of the Board shall be taken on any matter except upon the concurring vote of not less than five ( 5 ) voting members of the Board pursuant to Section 2.2.5 (C) of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances, as amended. 4 . REPRESENTATION; PERSONAL INTEREST: No member of the Board shall appear before the Board or represent before the Board a person in any matter pending before the Board. No member of the Board shall hear or vote upon an appeal or motion for re-he-a-ring in which he is directly or indirectly affected in any financial way. Whenever a member of the Board has a personal, private or professional interest in any matter which comes before the Board, that member shall, within fifteen ( 15 ) days after the vote occurs, file the proper form with the recording secretary of the Board pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 112, Florida Statutes. 5. CONDUCT OF MEETINGS: All meetings shall be open to the public. The Chairman may administer oaths or require the attendance of witnesses, and shall administer oaths when hearing appeals. The order of business at meetings shall be as follows: a. ) Roll Call b. ) Approval of minutes of previous meetings c. ) Reports of committees d. ) Unfinished business e. ) Hearing of Appeals f.) New Business 2 " . . - 4. DECISIONS: Shall be made pursuant to Section 2.2.5 (D) of the Land Development Regulations of the Ci.ty of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances, as amended. 5. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice of the Public Hearing of the appeal shall be given in accordance with Section 2.4.2(A) ot the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances and Florida Statutes. 6. AMENDMENT: An appeal may be amended at any time or from time to time prior to or during the Public Hearing of the appeal, provided that the amendment does not materially alter the appeal as published in the public notice so as to make the public notice of the appeal misleading, or that the amendment does not request a greater variance from the terms existing ordinances than that requested by the ap~eal. In the event the amendment makes an appeal misleading or requests a greater variance, as determined by the Chairman of the Board; an amended public notice shall be given. The applicant shall pay any and alJ additional fees necessary for the re-publication of the public notice. 7. DISMISSAL: An applicant may voluntarily dismiss his or her appeal at any time prior to the commencement of a roll call vote to decide such appeal, and such dismissal shall be without prejudice. A voluntary dismissal shall be in writing and filed with the recording secretary of the Board, unless announced at the public hearing. ARTICLE VII: HEARING AND RE-HEARING: l. Appeals shall be heard in the order of their filing; amended appeals shall have priority according to the date of the amendment and public notice. 2. At the public hearing, the applicant or any other interested parties, in accordance with Section 2.4.2(B) of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances, as amended, may appear on his own behalf or be 4 'f'~ . - - b. ) Fraud, misrepresentation or other misconduct of any person who submitted evidence to the Board. c. ) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect. d. ) The Board overlooked or misapprehended any material points of law or fact. If the Board grants a motion tor re-hearing, public notice of the hearing shall be given at the cost of the applicant. ARTICLE VIII: AMENDMENTS; EFFECTIVE DATE: l. The Rules of Procedure may be amended by the affirma tive vote of a majority of five ( 5 ) members present at any meeting or special meeting at which a quorum is present. The proposed amendment must be presented or submitted to the Board membership at least one ( 1 ) week prior to such meeting. 2 . These Rules of Procedure shall be reviewed by the Board at least once a year at any regular or special meeting. Reconunenda t ions for proposed amendments to these Rules of Procedure shall be presented to the Board in writing. 3. --, The Rules shall become effective fifteen ( 15 ) days - after their approval by the City Commission. These Rules of Procedure were adopted by the Board of Construction Appeals on the Iq"t'h day of June... , 199 I . Charrma Board of Construction Appeals Approved by the City Commission on the day of , 1991. Mayor, City of Delray Beach Attest 6 , ,~ - RULES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BOARD OF CONSTRUCTION APPEALS ARTICLE I. GENERAL GOVERNING RULES: The Board of Construction Appeals (hereinafter referred to as the Board) shall be gov- erned by Article 2.2 of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, as amended, and the Rules of Procedure set forth herein, as adopted by the Board and approved by the City Commission. ARTICLE II. SPECIAL GOVERNING RULES: The Board shall also be governed by Article 2.4 of the Land De';elopment Regulations of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances, as amended, and the Rules of Procedure set forth herein, as adopted by the Board and approved by the City Commission. ARTICLE lt~. OFFICERS; COMMITTEES: 1. The Board shall elect a Chairman and Vice Chairman annually in the month of September, for a term of one ( 1 ) year pursuant to Section 2.2.1(0) of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances, as amended. 2. The Chairman (or in his absence the Vice Chairman) shall preside at all meetings and hearings of the Board and decide all points of order and procedure. The Chairman shall appoint any committees which may be found necessary. 3 . The recording secretary shall be designated by the City Manager. The recording secretary shall take and tran- scribe the minutes of each meeting of the Board and assume all ministerial duties. ARTICLE IV: 1. MEETINGS: The Board shall meet every third Wednesday of March, June, September and December at 5:00 p.m., unless '1.'1 - 6. ADJOURNED MEETINGS: The Board may adjourn a regular meeting if all business cannot be disposed of on the day set, and no further public notice shull be necessary for such a meeting if the time and place of its resumption are stated at the time of adjournment and are not changed prior to its resumption. ARTICLE V. ABSENCES: A Board member's absence from three ( J ) consecutive-meetings shall constitute an automatic' resignation from the Board by such member, unless said .absence is due to illness or other extraordinary circumstances. Each Board member shall be responsible for notifying the recording secre- tary as promptly as possible of any anticipated absence from a Board meeting. Except for automatic resignation from the Board, a Board member may resign by filing a written statement of resignation with the recording secretary of the Board. Vacancies on the Board shall be filled pursuant to Section 2 . 2 . 1 ( F) --.o_f the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances, as amended. ARTICLE VI: RIGHTS; POWERS; PRIVILEGES AND DUTIES: 1- APPEALS: Shall be taken within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed ten ( 10) days of the action being appealed pursuant to the terms of Sections 2.2.5(0) and 2.4.7(E) of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances, as amended. 2 . HEARINGS: Shall be conducted in accordance with the terms of Section 2.4.2(8)(2) of the Land Development Regula- tions of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances, as amended. 3. STAY OF PROCEEDINGS: Shall conform to Section 2.4.7(E) of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances, as amended. 3 ,< . . - represented by a designated agent or attorney. If the appli- cant does not appear on his own behalf at the public hearing, he shall fi Ie with the recording secretary of the Board, prior to the public hearing, a statement, made under oath, authorLz- ing such other person or persons to represent him at the public hearing. 3. The order of the hearing shall be: a. ) Statement of the appeal by the Chairman b. ) Supporting argument by applicant c. ) Supporting arguments by other jnterested parties d. ) Opposing arguments by City Officials e. ) Opposing arguments by other interested parties f.) Rebuttal by those supporting appeal g. ) Rebuttal by those opposed to the appeal h. ) Final rebuttal by applicant Witnesses may be called and factual evidence and exhib...ts may be presented. The procedures for an appeal lodged pursuant to S e c t i-Q 11 2.4.7(E) shall be governed by Section 2.4.2(B) of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances, as amended. The Chairman may establish appropriate time limits for arguments, but such time limits shall be equal for both sides. The Roberts Rules of Order, latest edition, shall be the final authority on all questions of parliamentary procedure. 4 . RE-HEARING: An applicant may file a written motion for a re-hearing of any decision rendered by the Board. The motion shall be filed with the Chief Building Official within ten ( 10) days of the date the decision is rendered. The concurring vote of five ( 5 ) members of the Board shall be necessary to grant a motion for re-hearing. The motion for re-hearing may be based upon the following grounds: a. ) Newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to present at the public hearing. 5 ,',~ - MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER{Jt 1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # cg'rr) - MEETING OF AUGUST 13 , 1991 AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER FUNDS/DECADE OF EXCELLENCE BOND ISSUE DATE: August 7, 1991 At your June 18th workshop meeting the Commission approved the final Master Plan and project list for improvements at the Municipal Golf Course. Concurrent with that approval, the Commission committed to the transfer of funds in the amount of $30,000 from the Decade of Excellence Bond Issue interest earnings. This item is before you for formal action on that commitment. The distribution of the $30,000 will be $10,000 into Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Golf Course Improvements, Other (Account No. 225-4762-572-60.69) and $20,000 into Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Golf Course Improvements, Uncommitted (Account No. 225-4762-572-60.99) . This transfer is necessary in order to provide adequate funds for the Golf Course improvement project, as well as provide the required contingency ($27,000) for this project. Recommend authorization be granted to transfer funds in the amount of $30,000 from the Decade of Excellence Bond Issue interest earnings into Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Golf Course Improvements, Other (Account No. 225-4762-572-60.69) and Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Golf Course Improvements, Uncommitted (Account No. 225-4762-572-60.99). '" //, (':f' '~ [" I( I ~ .._L.~, _-\ - .f l7'- i [ITY DF DELAAY BEA[H 100 N.W. 1st AVENUE . DELR"-Y BE.!\CH HCJHIDA 33444 . ')7 i24ll000 MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden, City Manager FROM: ~?J}f Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager/ Administrative Services SUBJECT: Agenda Item :It City Commission Meeting August 13, 1991 Budget Transfer Municipal Golf Course DATE: August 5, 1991 ACTION REQUESTED City Commission is requested to transfer $30,000 from the Decade of Excellence Bond Fund Interest Account code 225-0000-361-10.00 to the Decade of Excellence Bond Fund Golf Course Projects Account codes 225-4762-572-60.69 Improvements Other ($10,000) and 225-4762-572-60.99 Uncommitted ($20,000). BACKGROUND On June 18, 1991, City Commission approved the final Master Plan and project list for the Municipal Golf Course. With this approval City Commission committed to the transfer of $30,000 from the Decade of Excellence Bond Fund Interest Account to the Golf Course project. This agenda item formalizes that commitment. RAB:kwg THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTER ". Oqx~ - MEMOR1I.NDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROt-!: CI'l'Y MANAGERCM SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~N - MEETING OF AUGUST 13 , 1991 AUTHORIZATION TO EXPEND FUNDS/LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST FUND DATE: August 7, 1991 This item is before you for authorization to expend funds from the Law Enforcement Trust Fund to purchase a Computer Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA) and attendant training. With the recent resignation of Jack Land and the elimination of the Police Trainer position, the Police Department no longer has a certified polygraph examiner. Lie detection tests are used both for pre-employment and specific criminal investigations. In order to provide these services the Police Department has the option of: A. Contracting out, which costs approximately $65 per test. B. Training another Police employee, which would take approximately one year for certification. C. Utilizing the CVSA instead of the polygraph for lie detection. The CVSA is being used by a number of law enforcement agencies nationwide as an alternative to the polygraph. The CVSA detects, measures and charts the fluctuations in the voice according to the degree of stress. Copies of recommendation letters as well as a brief description of the CVSA is attached as backup material for this item. rrhe cost of the CVSA instrument is $5,425. The Police Chief is recommending that four individuals be trained at the cost of $3,800. The total expenditure for the CVSA and attendant training is $9,225. Recommend authorization to expend $9,225 from the Law Enforcement Trust Fund to purchase a Computer Voice Stress Analyzer from the National Institute for Truth Verification and to train four staff members on the use of the CVSA equipment. ,I'H -,-j/ ( 1'\ (y' ) D~~rW~;At~~~:~e ~:'~~Y~:c?:~~:~::=nt 11 . (407) 243-7888 Fax (407) 243-7816 MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden, City Manager ~ FROM: Richard M. Lincoln, Interim Police Chief DATE: August 9, 1991 SUBJECT: COMPUTER VOICE STRESS ANALYZER As you are aware from our meeting on Wednesday, August 7, 1991, the Police Department needs to consider options available in terms of lie detection. With the recent resignation of Jack Land and the subsequent elimination of the Police Trainer position, the Police Department no longer has a certified polygraph examiner. The options available to us in addressing the issue of lie detection for both pre-employment and specific criminal investigations include: 1. Contracting out for this service; 2. Arranging for training for another Police employee; 3. Utilizing the Computer Voice Stress Analyzer instead of the polygraph for lie detection. In 1990 the Police Department processed 62 applicants through pre-employment polygraphs. At the rate of $65.00 per test this would represent an annual consulting expense of over $4,000.00 and would not include the additional expense of specific tests associated with criminal investigations. The training and polygraph certification process for a Police employee would be a significant time commitment, as the actual training and apprenticeship takes approximately one ( 1) year before the trainee is certified. The Computer Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA) is being used by a number of law enforcement agencies nationwide as an alternative to the polygraph. Area law enforcement agencies including Boynton Beach, Palm Beach, and Riviera Beach are presently using this process for both pre-employment and specific examinations with great satisfaction. The advantages for converting to this system include: ~ ~ -- -- , ..r.I'~'/ ~~1iI:~; ~OQ'~ _\'" 6"~- . -_....f/t:..._-.. AN INTERNATIONALLY ACCREDITED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY " SUBJECT: COMPUTER VOICE STRESS ANALYZER August 8, 1991 Page 2 1. CVSA training is accomplished in 40 hours and is conducted in West Palm Beach, thereby greatly reducing travel and training expenses. 2. CVSA pre-employment tests can be conducted in 10 to 15 minutes. 3. CVSA tests can be conducted in the home of the subject. It is my recommendation that we utilize Law Enforcement Trust Fund money to purchase a CVSA instrument and the training of four (4) individuals for certification. The total cost for this will be $9,225.00 ($5,425.00 for instrument; $3,800.00 for four people at $950.00 each). A member of the Investigative Section will be trained and utilized in criminal investigations. A member of the Organized Crime Section will be trained and uti lized in testing informants. A member of staff will be trained so that an impartial individual would be available to interpret charts and retest individuals if necessary. The fourth individual receiving training could be someone from Human Resources. This would allow pre-employment testing to be removed from the Police Department entirely. This individual would also provide pre-employment testing for firefighter applicants, thereby eliminating the annual recurring consulting costs of the Fire Department. Should you agree with this proposal, I will arrange for this request for expenditure of Law Enforcement Trust Fund moni e s to be included on the August 27, 1991 Consent Agenda so that the individuals selected for training are able to attend a class scheduled for September 16 - 20. RMLjppt . ,/1 s tjx_;'-c'-- ()~Ol q I NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR TRUTH VERIFICATION DIRECTOR MAILING ADDRESS CHARLES HUMBLE. Ph.D. 515 N. FLAGLER DR. CRIMINOlOGIST SUITE 300 PAVILION WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 407 -835-3944 FLORIDA TRAINING ANNOUNCEMENT Th~ NationaL In6t'tu~e 604 T4uth Veki6ication i~ p~ea~ed to announce that a Ce~ti6ied Examlne~~ Cou~~e l~ ~cheduled 6o~ Sept. 16-20 in We~t Palm Beach, Fto4iaa. Thi~ cou~~e i~ applicable 60~ the CVSA and the old PSE. With the ~ecent u~e 06 the Compute~ Voice St~e~~ Anatyze~ by the Palm Beach Pollee Dept. (the Palm beach P.D. ha~ th~ee lnve~tlgato~~ t~alned and l~ in the p~oce~~ 06 having th~ee addltlonal lnve~tlgato~~ t~ained thi6 6all) to va.tidate the vlctlm~ allegatlon6 in the Palm Beach 4ape ca6e, we have 60und it nece~~a~y to ~chedule additional c.ta~6e6 6o~ Flo~ida. The CVSA'~ ~e~ult~ we~e late~ con6l~med by a 60~en~ic polyg~aph examination (conducted by the State Atto~ney'~ 066ice). The CVSA exam took 45 mlnute~ and wa~ conducted in the vlctlm~ home. Many depa~tment~ in the State 06 Flo~lda have 60und that the CVSA l4 an excellent lnve~tlgatlve tool. Among tho~e l~ the Collle~ County She~i66'~ Vept. Having pu~cha~ed 4 CVSA'6 and t~alned 10 lnve~tlgato~~ 60me time ago, they a~e elated with the unlt'~ pe.~60~mance. In 6act, the CVSA'~ have be.en ~o ~UCCe.666ut a~ Collle.~ County that they a~e In the p~oce~~ 06 t~alnln9 addltlonal detectlve~ In lt~ a~e. The Po~t St. Lucie P.O. ha6 . now al~o joined the 4ank~ 06 tho4e that have ~wi~chea ~o the CVSA along with the Col.tie~ County She~i66'~ Dept., Palm Beach P./)., Nap.l.e6 P. V. , Vavle P. V., Sanlbel P. V. , and the Rivie.~a Beach P.O., among othe~4. In o:the~ ~ta:te~, ~uch a~ Indiana 6o~ , . , , ln~tance, ove~ 45 depa~tment~ a~ well a~ eve~y co~~e.c:tional " ln~tltution ha6 made the ~witch :to :the CVSA. Fo~ 6u~the~ ln60~matlon on the CVSA o~ ou~ Sept. cla~ ~ , plea6e contact ou~ 0661ce a~ ~oon a~ po~~ible a6 ou~ cta~6e6 a~e timitea to te.n ~tudent~. J/Q.~ IECoV/l .1,11 February 26th, 1990 Dr. Charles Humble National Institute For T.ruth Verification 5849 Okeecmbee Blvd., SUite 201 West Palm Beach, Florida 33417 Dear Dr. Humble: City of Sanibel As you krx:M, I have been administering "truth verificat- ion" exams via the voice stress analyzer for b'1e past six years. 800 Dunlop Road I was originally trained by you on the old PSE equi:t;rnent, ani Sanibel. Florida 33957 used this systan with great success. In 1988, my departIrent purchased your new Carg;>uter Voice AREA CODE. 813 Stress Analyzer which made the PSE obsolete ani antiquated. The CITY COUNCIL 472... 135 CVSA has a trem:mdous advantage over the old PSE, in that it is Imlch easier to operate, Imlch quicker, and the stress graphics "DMINISTRA TIVE 472.3700 make chart interpretation quite sinple. BUILDING 472"'55~ E:MERGENCY MANAGEMENT 412.311 I Voice stress "truth verification" has been an invaluable F'INANCE 472.9615 tool for us in our investigations, particularly in the area of LEGAL 472...359 suspect elimination. The CVSA has saved us literally hundreds PARKS o!i RECREATION 472.3373 of hours in what would have been wasted tiIre following oonven- PLANNING 472...136 POLICE 472.3111 tional interview techniques, by fastly eliminating the i.nnocent PU8UC WORKS 412-6397 and putting us onto the perpetrators. Confession rates have also significantly increased for us since even the perpetrators have very little arguement after seeing their charts, because of their sirrplicity. In closing, I would highly recx:mrend the CVSA to any law enforcarent agency interested in saving tiIre on investigations, and getting to the truth arrl the suspect (s) in the shortest p:>ssible tL-re. Keep up the good work with your Institute. , '. .:~~ ayne Hinz Detective/SUpervisor sanibel Island, Florida Police DepartIrent C I T Y OF RIVIERA BEACH 600 WEST BLUE HERON BLVD. . RIVIERA BEACH. FLORIDA 33404 O....ICIlO.. CHIEF' OF' ~OLICE March 16, 1990 Dr. Charles Humble National Institute for Truth Verification 5849 Okeechobee Boulevard, #201 West Palm Beach, FL 33417 Dear Dr. Humble: Our Department recently purchased a Computer Voice Stress Analyzer from your Institute, and two officers were trained on the instrument. Prior to our acquisition of the CVSA, our lie detection examinations were done by a polygraph examiner. Since our examiners returned from your training program, we have had remarkable success with the CVSA. In our very first case, we were required to test all the employees of one business. The one person who was considered above suspicion, failed the exam, which made us doubt the accuracy of the instrument. However, our subsequent investigation proved that the instrument has correctly identified the cUlprit. Needless to say, we were impressed. We have since conducted many exams on individuals, with the youngest being 10 years of age. In this case, the CVSA accurately identified the deceptive response of the subject, which then led to a successful conclusion of the case. In all examinations conducted, we have found the instrument accurate in its finding. As a department of 101 sworn officers, we are now in the process of training all detectives in using a standard tape recorder to conduct a covert exam in the field. We also plan to establish a pre-employment examination for new pOlice-fire employees. In summary, the CVSA is one of the most impressive investigative ':\ tools we've acquired. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the outstanding training program and the special interest that you have shown our Department. Sincerely, ~~ ~ .~."= ames o. Fitz Keith B. Childers, Lieutenant hief of poli Internal Affairs Officer JOF/sd ~ ," The City of Fort Wayne Dr. Charles Humble National Institute For Truth Verification 5849 ~keechobee Blvd. Suite 201 West Palm Beach. FLA 33417 Dear Dr. Humble, Being a Polygraph Examiner with approximately five years of experience I was somewhat skeptical of the Voice Stress Analyzer. along with the fact that there was only one week of instruction. I attended Lynn Marcy's school, "The American Institute Of Professional Polygraph And Applied Psychology" located at Dearborn.MI for nine weeks plus two additional weeks after running 200 exams. I also have fifteen years of experience as a police officer, ten of which have been in the Detect i ve 'Bureau. This may have had some bearing on my skepticism. It should be noted here that the Fort Wayne Police Dept. has approximately 300 officers with a population of 180,000. As you can imagine our case load I is quite heavy and I schedule five to seven exams a week. During this past week I have run seven exams using the Computer Voice Stress Analyzer. Due to your instruction on Interrogation Techniques I obtained two confessions prior to the exams, three verified "Truthfuls", one "Decepti ve" and cleared a pr ime suspec t in a Homicide Investigation. So far I have had no problems in calling the charts with total confidence in your Instrument and myself. I have also discovered that the amount of time needed to conduct an exam has been greatly reduced. There has been one problem. Since returning from your school and with my success so far I am being hounded by Detectives for exam dates. , I will continue to keep you abreast of my progress and I am looking , '1\ forward to seeing you in January for the Advanced Course. Sincerel~ tt( I!: La::r Ft. Wayne Police Dept. #1 Main St. Ft. Wayne, IN 46802 1-219-427-1201 An Equal Opportunity Employer One Main Street, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802 '" AN~"'111:4 'V'III . ,. :'f~' ~':~;;/ > . ii, \' .! . .i f.' 'I' r' ',. ~ " ...-....... :1 . io" t. "- .~\" ,.... - --..-. /-------- ,pl'- -...::.. ,- ..' . -. ~~.. ,/ " _/ ...--- - /.' --- .- ~REVOLUTIONARY ., ...--/----/~ BREAKTHROUGH IN ~., TRUTH VERIFICATION /' / .. .- ~...-- / .- CVSA COMPUTER VOICE STRESS ANAL YZER Using the latest micro-computerized electronics, the CVSA is now able to detect the sub-audible changes in a speakers voice that occur with stress and deception. The CVSA detects, measures and charts the stress in a person's voice INSTANTANEOUSL Y with or without the person's knowledge HISTORY Throughout history, men have tried ingenious methods for sorting out truth-tellers from liars. A medieval "truth by trial" technique called for thrusting a suspect's hand into a fire; if it was not burned, he was judged innocent. An ancient Chinese test required a suspected wrongdoer to chew rice powder while being questioned. If the powder was dry when he spit it out afterward, the man was condemned-on the theory that the tension of lying had blocked his salivary glands, producing a dry mouth. With the increase in population, many problems have developed in our society. Science and its creations have recognized these problems and come up with solutions. Such as: Excessive speeding brought on the Radar Speed Trap and radar brought on the Radar Detectors. Hijack- ing caused science to develop the Metal Detector at all airports. Credit brought on Credit Cards which brought on Instant Electronic Credit Checks. Increased drunk driving brought on the Breath Analyzer. WHY? ", , Depending upon whose figures you believe, American businessmen are losing $5 biliiO'n to $50 billion a year to dishonest employees. To combat the loss, they have turned increasingly to the CVSA to screen out potential thieves, as well as junkies, alcoholics, the emotionally unstable, and the politically extreme. It is an unfortunate fact that many people feel they have a right to lie. How many wrong decisions have you made based upon a lie? The CVSA will give you the edge. You will now have a tool to help you tell the truth from a, lie. -2- H." ;lo,.O 2, You can record the voice on a tape recorder and run It thru . the CVSA or run the voice . directly into the input jack 1, Durinq speech, the sound of the voice includes a buzzing vibration called microtremor, Under stress, the autonomic or involuntary nervous system causes an inaudible increase in the frequency of these microtremors, I " ~ . 1 ~ t., " ,{P -""'.-............ ; .. \':,"i " ". (t, There is no other equipment .., I, needed. Everything you need is enclosed in the attache case ~ - " ~ :l the processor Isolc1tes the mlcrotrelt1tJrs tram the other souhds at the voice, ahd mec1surl=j!3 thE:! chahges ih their electrical ehergy that occUr dUHh!:1 stress. 4. A stylus charts the fluctuation of stress patterns on a bat graph Immediately aftet the qUestion. S. The patterns are then Interpreted by you. ! I I ~>l . J I-<~"'" \ Ii I , I ~ .' ., _ r ~ .. . , \....,... - - ~~- \ ~\ I I // \ I I , OICE '..~ AL YZER 1(~f<S FOR TRUTH IF' . . HOW DOES IT WORK? When a person is under stress, the autonomic nervous system, preparing the body for emergency reactions, causes the pupils to dlalate, blood to rush away from the limbs, and the muscles to tense. Since the vocal chords are principally muscular tissue, they too, tighten and certain sub. audible changes occur in the voice. These changes are called micro-tremors: tiny frequency mod. ulations in every human voice. These modulations are inaudible and involuntary. OPERATES JUST LIKE A STANDARD HOME THERMOSTAT We can compare the CVSA measuring thesemicro-tremors to the operation of a standard home thermostat. If the thermostat is set at sixty-five, the heat does not come on until the house temperature has dropped below sixty-five and then does notturn off until the temperature rises above sixty.five. Thus the temperature is constantly experiencing "tremor". Similarly, human muscles are In a state of constant tremor as they maintain equilibrium. Thus, under relaxed conditions, the human voice muscles are under control of the central nervous system and tremor at a normal frequency. When the onset of stress causes the autonomic nervous system to "kick In", the muscles begin to tighten up. The CVSA's computerized circuitry detects, measures, and charts the fluctuations or "modulations" of a "micro. tremor" in the voice according to the degree of stress. Stress cannot be measured numerically, but stress patterns do lend themselves to simplified chart interpretation. The CVSA's Stress Pattern Chart is traced with a heated stylus on heat sensitive paper similar to the way an EKG charts the beating o.f the heart. NO WIRES , You can tell the person you are speaking with that you are using the CVSA or not, depending on the I situation-and it does not require any wires hooked to the body. It is not restricted to "yes" and "no" answers, but rather can analyze any spoken word, or even a dull groan. (However, most of our users feel more comfortable measuring "yes" and "no" answers). USE ANYTIME-ANYWHERE ? -..-.. ~ ~~;"'- It also has the tremendous advantage of being able to analyze a prior recording. Thus, an inter- - rogation, speech, or conversation could be taped in 1980 and analyzed in 1987. By asking a series of questions and interpreting the computer results, you can immediately tell whether the sub-stress patterns indicate deception, lying, or the truth. '''.. , , 'l'~ THE CVSA CHART RECORDER MEASURES THE MICRO-TREMORS AT THE SAME TIME YOU ASK THE QUESTION. You can see the results of your Questions on the chart recorder immediately after your question. This helps you in knowing what questions to ask next, or you may want to ask the same ques- tion over again for a second verification. , , \ A WORD OF CAUTION \ " t-X,t'f Stress may result from any number of factors; an individual being held up by a gunman or a per- f? ,,~ ' son burning oneself will feel stress. So, too, will a person who is lying experience stress, partic- ~ J:iI ;.~,', ularly if the lie hides something of importance. -5- ,. WHO USES IT? Anyone who would like to know the truth. Any conversation (personal or telephone) can easily be run directly into the CVSA or recorded on any tape recorder and run through the CVSA later. All your conversations can now be analyzed for truth. The CVSA is now being used by industrial and retail companies to screen applicants for employment and to in- vestigate in.house thefts. Fast food stores, Gas Stations, Restaurants, and Drug Stores give general honesty tests every few months. Police, Fire Departments, and County Sheriffs now use the CVSA in criminal investigations. Insurance companies use the CVSA to check taped interviews with people filing suspicious claims for damage or loss. If you knew when your customers were lying - how much more could you sell? If you are a buyer, would it be nice to know if you are getting the lowest price? If you are buying real estate, what really is their lowest price? Lawyers are using the CVSA to find out if their clients are telling them the truth. Psychologists are using the CVSA for truth verification In their treatment of patients. Because the CVSA can be used on personal conversations, tapes, telephones, TV or radio broadcasts, the in- dividual applications stagger the imagination. CAN I USE IT? When you receive your CVSA, plug the system into your electrical outlet and read the instruction manual. The CVSA is designed so with a minimum of training and a few hours of practice, anyone can use it. There are basically four levels of use: I 1. Nominal personal use-All you will need Is the Instruction manual. 2. Personal use-We recommend attending the basic 3 day course. " i, 3. Extensive Personal and Business Use-We recommend that you attend the 1 week Intermediate course. 4. Professional Examiner-We recommend you attend the Certified Examiners 2 week course. WHAT YOU RECEIVE 'l 1. The complete CVSA unit packaged inside an attache case, with a removable lid. 2. A microphone for speaking directly into the CVSA. 3. A jack on the CVSA to either plug a telephone or a tape recorder into. 4. Three (3) rolls of chart paper. (Chart paper is 2 inch Thermal paper). It can be pur- chased through us or at any medical supply house. 5. A complete, easy to understand, operations manual. 6. A one year guarantee on all parts and labor. National Institute for Truth Verification 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 300 Pavilion West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (407) 835-3944 Copyright'" 1988 Computer Voice Stress Associates, Inc. We reserve the right to change specifications of the system without notice. -6- M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGERtfv1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 1?LJ - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 REQUEST TO ERECT AN AWNING EXTENDING OVER THE CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY (BETHESDA BARGAIN BOX) DATE: AUGUST 8, 1991 We have received a request from Bethesda Bargain Box to erect an awning on the front of their building located at 12 N.E. 5th Avenue (North Federal Highway) which will extend over the City's right-of-way. The proposed awning is seventeen (17) feet in length and will extend four (4) feet from the building over the adjacent public sidewalk. At your February 26, 1991, regular meeting, the Commission approved Ordinance No. 18-91 which provided for the extension of canopies, marquees and covered walkways into the public right-of-way when approved by the City Commission. Therefore, a public hearing or advisory board recommendation is not required. Staff has reviewed this request and found that the proposed structure meets all applicable code requirements. Recommend approval of the request from Bethesda Bargain Box to erect an awning on the front of their building located at 12 N.E. 5th Avenue (North Federal Highway) which will extend over the City's right-of-way. MEMORANDUM TO: DAVID HARDEN, CITY MANAGER FROM: LULA BUTLER, DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ~t) RE: BETHESDA BARGIN BOX REQUEST TO ERECT AWNING THAT WOULD EXTEND INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY - - DATE: AUGUST 7, 1991 ITEM BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION: - -- A request from Bethesda Bargain Box via Delray Awning to install one door awning on front of building which will extend into the City's right-of-way. The business location is 12 N. Federal Highway. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Ordinance No. 18-91, amending Chapter 6 "Infrastructure in Public Property," Section 6.3.5 provided for canopies, marquees and covered walkways may extend into the public right-of-way when approved by the City Commission through applicable agreement with the City. The business owner has made a building application to erect a red & white striped awning, seventeen feet in length extending four (4) feet from the building along the entrance (front door) part of the building. The proposed structure meets all applicable code requirements and has been approved by the Fire Department and Chief Building Official. RECOMMENDATION: We would recommend Ci ty Commission approval of the request to erect the proposed awning at 12 NE 5th Avenue. LB:DQ B:Awning.DH LB2 .. ,~ IV N lNG, o~ .' ,...0 -G" ,<'\ __ truss . "- I I I . i I ! -- _F Q_R: B IE" :r-H.~~..Q...t\ ~ A.~_~_~.\t4______ _ __~__o .~.._.___._________ \2- N. E.!-_-5-,"-~___ ~v c. ----..-....--------- O..:....;':l...Q, SCALE: APPROVED BY DRAWN BY DATE: 7-'0 -'11 DELRAY AWNING, INC. !fl.~ )fMWa4 )f~ - - . n~,.~.. On.,,,,h I=Il'1rln'111.l41) DRAWING NUMBER . . . Agenda I tem No.: AGENDA REQUEST Date: 8/7 /91 Request to be placed on:. x Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: 8/13/91 Description of agenda item (who. what. where, how much): Permission to erect an awning on public right-of-way at 12 NE 5th Avenue ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQOIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO Recommendation: Approval Department Head Signature: ~Q(;^_ ~J,t0Q)._ Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget Director Review (required on all ite.s involving expenditure of funds): Funding available: YES/ NO Funding alternatives: (if applicable) Account No. & Description: Account Balance: City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: &/ NO tpvf Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: Action: 0' ,~ . MEMORANDUl..f 'ro: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER {~l SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~p - f\1EETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 REQUEST TO MODIFY GRANT AGREEMENT/AUBURN TRACE JOINT VENTURE DATE: August 7 , 1991 We have received a request from Auburn Trace Joint Venture Group to modify the Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) agreement by amending the repayment schedule to allow payments to commence in 1995 and to allow the payment of three equal installments on the Purchase Money mortgage payment as opposed to one balloon payment. The original agreement entered into in 1989, provided that the City would loan the developer the $3.8 million UDAG grant, defer payments during years one through fivej and, assess interest at 3% compounded on the loan. Beginning with the fifth year, repayment of the principal and interest was to be made in equal monthly installments in accordance with a 25 year amortization schedule. A balloon payment, sufficient to payoff the entire outstanding indebtedness of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest was to be made at maturity of the Permanent UDAG loan in 2005. The developers' proposal is to begin repayment with the fourth year, 1995 as opposed to 1996, with a revised payment amount during the first three years of repayment. They are also proposing to pay the Purchase Money mortgage on the land note in three equal installments during 2003 through 2005, as opposed to one balloon payment of $530,000 in 2004. Staff has reviewed this request to assess its impact on the City. It has been determined that approval of this request would have a minimum impact upon the City and could actually be advantageous. However, while the request is considered a minor amendment under federal regulations, authorization from the Department of Housing and Urban Development is required. Recommend approval of the request from Auburn Trace Joint Venture to modify the UDAG grant agreement by amending the repayment schedule to allow payments to commence in 1995 and to allow the payment of three equal installments on the Purchase Money mortgage payment contingent upon approval from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. . . MEMORANDUM TO: DAVID HARDEN, CITY MANGER FROM: LULA.BUTLER, DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT~~ RE: AUBURN TRACE JOINT VENTURE, INC (ATJV) REQUEST TO REVISE UDAG REPAYMENT AND BALLON DATE OF PURCHASE MONEY MORTGAGE PURSUANT TO TERMS UNDER THE APPROVED GRANT AGREEMENT - - DATE: AUGUST 7, 1991 ITEM BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION: - -- City Commission consideration of the request from the Auburn Trace Joint Venture Group to amend the approved Grant Agreement to revise terms specified for repayment of the $3.8 million dollar UDAG loan to the City and the Purchase Money Mortgage agreement. BACKGROUND: The City approved and executed a Grant Agreement on June 22, 1989, entering into partnership with the Auburn Trace Joint Venture, to construct 256 affordable rental units on City-owned land pursuant to terms mutually agreed upon between the City, ATJV and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The agreement required that the City loan to the developer the $3.8 million dollar UDAG grant with specific terms that provided that during years one through five, principal payments shall be deferred and interest accrued and compounded at 3%. The interest amount is payable in a single payment at the end of the term. Beginning with the fifth year, repayment of the principal and interest shall be made in equal monthly installments in accordance with a 25 year amortization schedule during the term of the Permanent UDAG loan, and a balloon payment sufficient to payoff the entire outstanding indebtedness of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest be made at maturity of the Permanent UDAG loan, (year 2005). The developer is respectfully requesting to amend the repayment schedule by proposing to begin repayment with the fourth year 1995 as opposed to 1996, with a revised payment amount during the first three years of repayment. They are also proposing to pay the Purchase Money mortgage on the land note in three equal payments during years 2003 through 2005 as opposed to one balloon payment of $530,000 in year 2004. - Page 2 David Harden ATJV Request to Amend Grant Agreement The request has been reviewed by the Finance Director, Joe Safford, for its impact on the City. He has determined that the requested amendment has minimum impact and could actually be a advantage to the City. The request is considered as a minor amendment under the federal regulations, although it requires a written authorization from HUD, we expect the same may be accomplished over a three to four week time period. RECOMMENDATION: The Community Improvement Director and the Director of Financ~ would recommend City Commission approval of the request from Auburn Trace Joint Venture. We would also recommend that staff be directed to propose a formal Amendment to the Grant Agreement to the Department of Housing & Urban Development, pursuant to federal regulations governing such actions. The documented repayment request schedule is attached for your reference. LB:DQ Attachments B:ATJV.AM/LB-R2 . co "'" M 0:::0 ~Si~ C c:: en M :P ~:: m m:p "-JMC"")C.....rY1 ...... :p ::10 c:: c:: = ... "" ...... Z-......c::::;,cnt:D ;IIi ?ill'".... ;JiMO ~n:! ...... ...... :c c 1:1-41-42>-4-4 ::lD ~ ~ .., ... - ...... -< -< en ...... ~ ~ r- ::IOiIi"" ,.., :>::I _ Z en .., ,., Zo ::II: ::II: .., n ...... z z <JI M m ,.., r- r- C---C..... 0 1'"-- _-<-0 ..... OC ;:g ::10 0 ::10..........::10::10 -0 ::II::a _ z CI ...... ::s Cc::& 0:::0 --4-..........~......<: I'" ..... en M MZo ..... "'" "" -0 m -- m G'1D-'-"4- en - ::10 z: Q C1r-m m Zo ,.., MM ~ %>CDOCDZoM :zoo .....~~ ~:;;~ = .... ::10 :J> ", ", m- - "G')m ...... ..... I'" z: .....g8z ..... - ~~ & - c:: 0:::0 ::10 ::10 .... Z _ :J> %> ::0 z: :J> :po I'" -000- en ~~ =~r- ,.., - ,.., ..... ...... ::10 .... ...... ... -0 CI - - - c:: <:i!~~~ - ::0 I'" ,.., ::10 :zoo 'z -0 CI CI - ::IE c:: .... ", -< .. ,.., I I M -..... ..... 0- M ,.,., .. Z ~ :z: _ :J> m ....m,.., CI en - ...... ,., en en r- ...... I I ::s ~ - ...... en z :J> ,.., ...... r- <::> "-J r- - - M ..... M en - 0 Zo r- - ...... 0 0.... z ::: en o :J> :z: <:> "'" :z: M ::10 ::10 r- O::s- 0 :c ,.., ..... -< - :po ...... m "'" ...... ~ 0:::0 %> M c:: _ en :c r- :z: en - I'T'1 ...... c:: CI 3 ,.., "",,,,,, I'T'1 = ..... ...... CI en - ,...., :z: ::10 M <: ::10 , I - ,.., I I .... %> I , rn en - - I I ,.., UI UI 0 I I M - _ 0 I I CI :>> - - I I - <: ...... "-J "-J <:> I , ...0 /TI <:> c:> 0 I I ...0 ::10 ...... c:> 00 , .0 :p .... I en ,.., -0 I ,.., , - - ::10 ::0 t.Il %> 0- ...... - ...... VI - .... ..... -< ...0 .... .... "-J ...... - ..... ...... 0"- ..0 - .... - ,.., ...... 0 I - VI .... ..... CD 0- .... ..0 .... ..... , CI %> - -- - - -""'o..Q, - - - I - ::0 . Ul "-J .... 0 0 CD - ........ I ...0 .... - CD ..0 <:> 0 ..0 ...... c:> .... ..0 c:> .... .... I ..0 .0 Ul_ 0 -='0 0 - o ..... CD .00-_ I - - - - - I I - - , I :; 0- VI ..... - CD 0"- _ - 0- , CD .... Ul .... ...... CD .....- - , c:> - Ul I "-J - _-VI .... ..... CD VI - .... ..0 0- , - -- - - - - - - - I - . 0- Ul ..... .....0 <::> - ........ 0 0.... _ , ...0 ....- .... 0 - <::> 0 ..0 CD <:> c.." .. .... 0- Ul , ..0 ..... Ul -.. CD COOO 0 t.Il o CD "'" .... .... .... , ..... ..... - - - , - - - ..... t.Il CD _ CD ..... ---.. 0 .... -.. <JI .... ..... ..... ~~~ 0.... .... CD 0 0_.... .... CD ..0 .... ...0 - -- - - - - - - - - - ::0 . 0 .... -..... 0 0 .... _.... 0 "-J .... ..... .... - 0- 0 ~gg ..0 0- g......o <JI .... -.. ...0 .. Ul_ .... 0 .... -=~ c:o~"'" ..... .... f I - - - -.. t.Il CD - CD c:a _ - CD 0- <::> Ul UI .... .... .... ..... ..0 0 -.......... .... CD CD _ VI .... - CD ..., -a .... - 0- - -- - - - - - - - . . .... .... -.... <::> 0 CD .... -:>.... -.. ..... "-J ..0 Ul .... ..0 - ~gg ..0 0 O_VI ....-.... ..0 ..... ......... Ul 0 ...... ~~O _ 0...0 .. .... - - .... 0- LII -a _:G'Q, __..0 Ul 0- _ Ul .... - .... _ ..0 ....""'- - LII <:I - .... -.. CD .... -a , o CD -.. - -- c,..;..", - - - I - - - - . . .... ..0 0 .... .... -a .... , .... .... Ul ..0 0- ....- 0 - 0 ..0 - 0..0- Ul ..0 Ul I ...0 <:I CD .... .... _0.000 ...... o UI.... ...... Ul _ Ul .... f - - - I I ..... I -- -- CD I .... t.Il ...0 _ ...0 ..0 _ - <::> CD CD I .... t.Il - -.. 0- .... ..0 ..0 ..... -- <::> .... I <::> - CD .... .... CD - _ 0- t.Il .... - -- I - - - - - - - - ::0 . . 0- .... , 0- .... Ul <::> - .... - 0- .... .... - o-OCD ..... I - 0 _ ..0 0 <::> ..0 ..0 CD -.... ...0 CD ...0 ...., - I ..0'0......0 .... 0.... CD .00...0 0- 0- , - - - , I - - ..... ..... , - - - ~ CD , ...., Ul 0 - 0 0 - -- CD , .... UI - .... tA .... .... ..0 .... VI - 0 .... I 0_ CD .... CD 0 .... ........ - - -- I - - c..,.O I ....~- - . . CD - , 0- ..... ..... , CD ....- ...0 -.. - Ul .... , - 0 - ...0 ...... , o VI.... 0-"0 ...0 -.. .... -.. - , ...00......0 CD I C> _ .... .... - 0 -.. .... I , -- - I , I - I -.... ..... , I - - , - CD I ...., UI .0 I _ C>_ , --..... CD CD I _ UI - .... 0- , .... _ ..0 , .... 0-- ..... .. I 0_ CD .... ..... , CD .... _ I _0..0 - -- , - - c....o I - - - I -'-om - Ul - I 0- .... ..0 , ......... - I ..0 CD ..... .... .... I -0 - ...0 0- , 0_ Ul , .. ...00 ..0 0- -- - I ...00.....0 .... I <::>.... .... f _ .. LII CD CD I , - - I - '" . "'" "'" .., "'" ::0 CI ..... c::o < en ..... ~ rn rn 2> ~MMC:-," ,.., -.:J CI _~::o c:: c:: ~~~ - a.....-c::tc.nCO ~ -0 ,.." ..... jifi""CI ~:! c::o c:::t -'\I --4 :D -of -4 r- ::0 ~ 2> U2 - ..... -c -c en ..... 2> 2> r- ""~U2 rn "., U2 U> .,., ~ :z 2U> .., ..... :z z rn fT'I r- r- ~;;;;;;~~ ~ ,..,- - _-c-o ..... ="' ::0 CI 2 z: Z Z CI ..... oo::<C ~ .....-....... W--c < "., ,.., Q':l ..... ..... 2> ..... <::lI "., ..... ..... (1'0-""'. .:n.... ::0 :z CI c::o r- m ,.., :z> ~nri .., :PCX)<:>CX)~"'" 2> .....~~ 2 r- z: a:I ..... - G1- - ..mrn ..... "., CI ..... ..... "., m 0 <:> "., - ::0 -.:J c- ::0 ::0 <n OOz: - IT1 IT1 _2>:P ::0 :P 2> "., - <:>> 00- cn (f1 z: -z:r- ,.., ..... ..... :lO """ ..... ... IT1 (f1 - n -.:J -- 00:: <!5!5!:!~ - ::0 fT'I ".,~ :zoo CI CI - :z <: (f1 -c I I M ... ..... ..... 0- M m fa z: 2 _ :zoo "., ... "., rn CI (f1 - ..... IT1 <n r- .... / I 2 :z - .... en :z ..... r- <:> o-J r- ;= rn - .... ..... ~ o:zoo CI 0.... z: - en z: 0 "'" z: ..... r- <:> 2- CI ::c -c - 2> ;;1 rn ..... "" n - c:: ::c r- - ,..., I I I - I - "" I "" I ~ I - I I "" 1XI "" CJO - I - - '"'" I - - '"'" I .;...I 1XI _ CJO - ..... ...., I c:...... ... <0 I _ 0- ... I CD .- 0_ 1XI - '"'" I CIO ..... .... I 0- CIO = I .... -- - I I I ::;; . . co .- 0- ""' CJO = ...., I ...... .... I - oo.... I ..0 ...., CJl ...., - <:> _ ..0 co I Q (,.....- I .... ..0 ..0 I -a 0-- -.. ~ .... ..00.......0 0 I 0"'" ...., I 0- ..0 CJl I .... -a . - - I - I I I I .... I -...., I ...., I - I I I ...., = ...., CJl - I -...., ... I - -... I ..0 CD _ CJl - .... co I .... 0...., I CJl .... _ I 0- - 0- CD _ - I CIO-_ I ..... 0- .... I "" -- I I I I ...... . . ..0 - I 0- "" CJl C> ..... I _ CD CJl I ....... t",,, (...oof I 0 <::>..... - o-J I - <:> _ -a 0- I <::> <:> 0- ..... <::>..... I <:> - 0- _ ..... - I ..OO-.....Q - I 0..... co .... _ CJO I = = I I - - - I I I I I .... I - "" "" I I I - - I ..... CD I ...... CJl ...., I - NUt - - c;..fI I Ut CD I _ CJI .... .... - , '"'" 0- _ 0- CD 0- I .... - , = .... CD - N I CIO r.." Ut - CJO -0 I "" ....- I - - I I ...... . . -0 - , 0- N CJO C> '"'" I _ 0.... - c............. I = - -.... "" I ....oo - .... CJl I <::> -.... ""'''''0 I = = 0- C> ""' .... I .. <:> C> -.. <:> ..... I c:> _ 0- ..... ..0 ...., I - I I - - - I I I I I - I - ...., N I I I I - CD I N CJl '"'" - ""'.,.. _ - 0- I ...., CD I _ UI .... .... C> ...... ...., .... 0- .... ..0 I - - I C> - CD _ 0- CD CD ..... ..0 _ ca I "" ....- I I ...., ..0 - I 0- ...., CJl 0 ..... _ ""'0 I _Ul_ I <:> "" _ 0- ...., I ....0 .... ..0 ..0 <:> -.0 OX) I -0 ..0 OX) I <:> ;:::; OX) CD ..0 - I .... 00 <:>........ <::> 0 c:> 0- 0- I c..1'I c:r-- ......, I ...., I - - I - I I I I I .... -...., I ...., I I I I - CD I N VI '"'" - ...... OX) I - ...., CD I CD OX) I ... UI .... .... .... ...... -.0 C> I ..... C> ..... I .... .- 0_ CD .- ..... co _ 0- I .... ... ... I o-J -- - - I I N . . ""' - 0- o-J C.Il C> 0- -.......... I -0 ..... C> I C> ..... c.n 0 ""' - 0 _ -.0 ..... 0- _ I 0- '" -.0 I 0 ~ ..0 c.n .... .... ...00......,00 0 0- C> I .... CJO 0- r ..... - - - I 1 .... - -...., ..... I I ~ - .....;::;-:0 I - CJl ..... <..II - . - _-0 I Po.) .... ..CJI"""-'" .- I (.01 0- .... CD"" .... I -0 - o-oca.- - I CO _ ..... 0- __ I o-J -- - ... - - - I - - - 1 o-J . . ca - 0- o-J 0 UI 0 ""' I _ _ 0 OX) c.n ..... I <:> UI 0 .- ""' - QoO _...a ..... . 0_.... 0- _ c.n I 0 :; o-J ..... 0 .... _00....0 .- I C> _.... OX) ..... - I - I - - - . I I .... I - '"'" ..... I I - - I 0- OX) ""' CJI C.It I - UI 0 _o-J_ I CIO '"'" ... -.... .... I (.01 (.01 -0 -0 ..... ...., I ..... '"'" C> CD _ CD I CD ...._ 0- <..II (.01 I ...., ....- I I o-J . . - N 0- <..II C> ~ I --- NN _ I C> o-CD_ N - .... -0 I 0_ .... _ _ ca I C> - - ""...., .... _00....0 ..... I OCICI- .... ..0 -0 I CJl CJO I - - - I I I I I ..... .... I .... I .... '"'" I - ..... I CI ..... ...., I ""' OX) 0- I 0- ..... I NN _ I ..... I o-.......-........'Q.. I -- ~ I - - - I :zoo 0- -0 I (.01 I C.Il .... ..... I - ... C> I r- '"'" C> , C>~(".0t4CD..... ..0 I .... ......... J .....UI_ I OX) ..... I ..0 CD <:) c.n - C> I 0- ca <..II I caUl- I - ....- I .. - ... - - I - - - I ~ ~ - I . . 0 ..... I ~QC>_c.....I UI I C> _ 0 I - -.... I -0 "" 0- '"'" I -oe>.......CJt ~ I ~ .... -0 I .....Nca I 0.... .0 0 I 00000 I c> r..n_ I 0- .... - I I I - - I - I - - lCI lCI n lCI ::100.... ~;;~ ;g~ t:!::: m""~ """-lMnc:-m m -0 c::J CZI CZI en .... Z......-IICIc.na::J z: -0 m.... :: M 0 o CZI .... .....:: CI 1::1 -4 -4 :Z> -41 -I m r- ::0 :Do m :I> UJ -0 c:: .... - .... -<-<en .... :J> :J> r- ::10 Z UJ o ::JO - ,. En <11 ." :I> :s :s en M ..... M <11 :z ....n m m r- r- o--_Clm 0 m -- --<-0 m <::> 0 ::JO ::0 CI :0..,. .... .... ::1:1 :::a -0 :sZZ z CI "" ..... :s <c:c: -=' ......-..-..e,....I-t< m men M 8;e~ ::JO -0 m -- "" mo-<..-t- m...... :1:1 :z 0 "" :I> m>> MM ..., :DoCZlOCD:I>n :Do .... m :s :sr-z mn mm ..... a')- - ~mrn .... _m m 0.... CZI m ::JOz: m 0 c:> m Z ::JO ... a _ .... c:: "'" ::0 :1:1 UJ 00 z m "., - ,.. >> Z :Do :po "., -000- en en z -zr- ::JO _m .... .... ::0 ""' ....- m en - M "., 0- -- c: C:!5~~~ - ::0 m m ::0 -0 z: -0 00 - z: <= en m :Do -. m I I n - ......... 0- M m .. z -< z: - :I> m ....mm 0 en - .... :s ..., en en r- .... I I :s :s - .... en m :I> m .... r- 0"" r- - m - .... Z Men - 0:1> r- ..... .... 0 o ... :z - ~~ ~ <:> "'" !i <11 O:S - M mm -< - :Do .... ~ c::o .... m :Do M - lCI _ <11 :: c:: z: <11 - r- ...... c:: m O~ "" lCI m CZI .... .... CI en - rn z: ::0 M I I < ::JO I _ m I I , M :I> I I rn <11 - I - I m '-" I ,,-,,0 , ...., - I _0 I = :Do I - - I :;; <= ...... N I "" <::> I rn <:> , 00 I -0 ::0 .... <:> I <::> 0 , 0 :Do ... , I tn I m -0 rn - , - "'" ::0 , %> 0- c..n ..... - ......... , - '-" ..... -< -0 '-" '-" ..... ..... - .... ..... 0- . -0 - ..... _ m ....... <:> _ U'I - ..... CD 0- N , -0 .... ..... = :p - -- - - -.. Q... Co , - - - - ::JO U'I N "" <:> 0 CZI , -..... c..n -0 .... - co -0 00 -0 ..... ON-o I 0....... ..... -0 0'-" - <::> 00 <::> - , <:> ..... co I 00-_ I - - I - - I - I , I . I - I - , , I I - 0- '-" ..... I _ CZI 0- , - - 0- , 0 CZI .... '-" ..... .... CD , .... -- I <:> - '-" , N - --'-" - ..... I CZlc..n- I _-00- , - -- - - - - , - - - I - - - , - . 0- UI I N.....O <:> - , _ _0 I 0.... _ I -0 ....- ..... <:> I -00 -0 CZI I o c..n_ I c..n 0- Ul I -0 ..... .... ...., CD , CZI<::> 0 <:> .... I o CZI .... I .... UI .... . N N I I - - , - , I , I , I I - - I I I , - ...., , .... CZI , - CZI..... - -..... I g N I .... .... ..... .... N , .... ...."" <::> N ,.... , <::> I 0_..... - CZI I CD 0- .... -0 UI -0 , - -- - , - - - . - - - - - - , - . . <:> - I -...~ <:::> <::> - I _ ""0 N....N , -0 _ - 0- 0 I - <:> 0 -0 0- , o .... -0 c..n .... ..... I -0 _....- .... , "..00 0 - I o -c..n CZlCZIc..n I .... .... I I - - - I , , - - ..... , _ CD"'CD - .... CD , - - CD 0- 0 c..n UI ..... ..... .... , .... -0 0 -....N --:-" CZI CD _ c..n - - CD -0 -0 ........:-~ - - - - ~o~ - . . w - - .....0 0 CD ..... .....N -0 .... N -0 - ..... 0 C> -0 0 o _ c..n N -.... -0 ..... .... ..... UI UI 0 0 0 ..... ~~o - 0-0 - - - - -- - ..... _ UI -0 --oCD - - -0 UI 0- _ UI o ..... - ~~:8 ""w_ - UI 0_ o _ ..... o co ..... - -- - - co - - - - - - - - . - -0 0- ..... .... _ -0..... _..... UI -0 o-N- 0 ......0 0-0 - <:> -0 - I UI -0 <-II I -0 00.... - _0000 ..... o UI N I ..... UI _ , .... UI - - , - . , I - I "" , _:O~ I , - CD _ UI -0 I - -.:> , - - _ UI ~:;: 0- .... -0 -0 I N ....- , __.:0 UI 0_ .... CZI -_ I 0- UI .... , - - - - I - - - , - . . - -0 0- N 00 - _ - 0- , _N_ , -0 0- - -0 0 -0 0...0 0 g~c3 , CD - N , -0 CZlCD-o - _0000 .... I 00-0 I 0- 0- - - I - - -N "" - CD - UI 0 _ 00 - -- 0- UI - .... CD ..... - .... _ -0 .... UI_ ..... N 0_ ..... - UI CD 0_ ""..... - - -- - - - - - - - - - :;; . .... -0 0- ..... o 0 ..... - .....- CZI_ _ .....- - .... -0 c....-t...o .... oc..n.... 0..... <:> -0 ..... -0 C> CD ...oo~o CZI 8~"'" """::0 ..... ..... - _N "" CD - - - ...., UI 0 _ C>_ -- N ~ CD _c..n - .... 0- .... -0 -0 .... 0-_ - 0_ CD _ ..... CDN-o -0 C> -0 - -- - - - - - - - - I .......om - ..... - 0- ...., UI 0 -0 - .....- I -0 CD N_ "" -0 _ -0 0- 0-0..... , _ -0 0 -0 0- -- - _00....,0 ..... 0....._ I _ _ UI CZI CD - - I - " , '" o:t M "'" ::0 0 ..... =:;;~ -0 ~ ,." ,." :zo ~(""'JMc:-rn ,., -0 Q :lO c:: ~~g! ..... Z_......ocnt::D _ -0 ,., ..... ffi~5J Q .... 0 c:::t-f-4%>-4........ ,..., .- ::0 :zo -0 c:: - ..... -< -< en ..... :p %0 r- ::Oil5en o ::0 en en TI :z> 2 2<.n n ..... U> :z: ,., ,., .- .- ~___o,..., 0 ,.,-- Z-<~ ,., ;::,,::00 ..........:::0:0 -0 :aZZ c::o ..... < <-= "'" -.........,.......(..001-4< ,..., ,..., en M n:p ..... ::0 -- ,." m a- (",004. en - ::a z: 0 0'-"" "'" ::Do n n .... :Do CO c::> CD :z> M :zo ..... ""'2 :zr-z: mon ,." ,." ..... 0'1- - .-a1f'T1 ..... -,." ,.,,0..... Q3 m ",00 ,." Z ::0 -0 -= - ..... ::lO ::0 en 0.0 z: ,." ,.., _ :zo :zo :zo :zo ,.., -000- en en lIE _ lIE .- ::0 .......... ::0 c... ..... .... ,., en - M ,., 00 < <~~~~ Z ::0 ,.., ,..,~ ~ - < U1 o I on .... -4"'" er- n ,.., .. z: -< _ :J> ,." "'" "' ,." Cl 'U) _ ..... :z en r- ...... I , =- :z ::: ...... en m .....r- .:::> N'- - m .... _ - Oo:z> .- ..... 0 0__ - z: 00 "'" z: en r- Oo 2- 0 M -< - :D ..... ffi ..... ,.., M - "'" % c:: - r- m , I , I ..- - IV , IV I , - - - , -- 0 N CD I N CJI - - - '-" I - - '"' 0 '"' CIO 0 .... UI - ...... "" "'" ....0 I .... 0- '-" 0 IX) - 0 o _ CIO _ ,... CD ...... ..cI I 0- CD 0 , - -- I , - - - :0 . . IX) .... I er- N CJI 0 N --- , _ 0...... ...Q "" UI "" I - <:> _ ..cI IX) .::> '-"- 0 ~ ...a....o ..0 er- ...... ..0 - , .... <::> <::>........ 0 <:> o ""IV I 0- ..0 CJI ..0 ..cI I - - 0 - I I I ..- - IV , IV 0 - I N IX) I N CJI _N_ o --- .0 CIO I .... CJI - ...... IX) '-" 0"" 0 UI...... _ 0- - 0 0- CD _ - I c:D__ , '"' 0- ...... "" -- 0 , , '":...tc..nc... N . . ..cI - I 0" N CJI 0 .... I _ c:D CJI , <:> <::> '-"- N I - 0 _..CI 0- , ooer- 0 ..... <::> "" 00 - 0- _ "" - , ....c:::>>O.....,Ql - I o '-" CD , ...... _ CJI <:> 0 , , - - I - 0 I - I , ..- I - IV , N , I - - I I "" ~ I N CJI N 0 _NCJ\ I - - CJI I CJI I .... CJ\ - ...... - , '-" 0" .- , 0- a:I 0- 0 ...... - I 0_ c:D _ N I IX) UI CJI I - CJ\ ..0 I N-- I , , - - - , "" . . -0 - I 0" N UI 0 "'" I _ 0..... 0 -"" ..... I 0 - .... "'" N I - 0 _ ..cI UI I .0 _-D I N N 00 0 0 - O"ON - I ..... C) <:> ....... c:> .... I 0_0" , ... ..0 N I - - 0 - - - I I I I - - N ..... I I 0 - co I NUl .... - ..... 0" - - 0- 0 N = I .... c..n ..- ...... 0 ... N ...... 0- ..0 ..., , - - , 0_ CIO _ 0- = co "" ..., - CD 0 "" -- 0 - - ...... - - - I N . . -0 .... 0 O"N UlO '"' _NO .... U'l _ I 0 N _ 0- N , -0 - ~ -0 <::> -D CD -0 -0 CD I <::> - =CO-O - I .-. cO <:> -.. 0 0 o er- 0- UI 0"0 ..... I "" IV I - - - I 0 , - , - -N IV 0 0 -- 0 "'" 0 0 - N'-" .... - ... CD I - I'.) co I - UI I .. c..n ....... ...- ....... ...... "" -D <::> ..... 0 '"' , - -D I c> - CJt co .. '"' I co _ 0"0 .....-"" I I'.) -- I ----- , - - - I N . . N - I 0- N 0 UI 0 0- , - ............ -0 (,of 0 I 0 "" "" 0 N I ~ oo-...Q ..... , <:> -- 0"0 N-D I 0 - -D 0 -0 - I _00......0 0 , o - 0 -0 UI 0- , "" ..... I , - - - , 0 I I - I - I -I'.) I'.) I I , - - I .... 0 I -NUl - t - -..., _1'.)..0 I CIO UI I ... c.n -..a _ -.. .... 0 "" 0-_ CO"- ...... , - -0 , COt __ CJI co ... - I IX) _ ..... cr- _ .... , N -- - - - ... - I - - - I N . . all - cr-NOUlO N I _ _0 co UI ...... I 0 UI ""_ N ....::::> 0..-....0 ..... I <:> - ...... 0"0 _ UI , 0 - NO- 0 - ..0'<:>.......,0 - I 00 0- ...... c:D ..... - I - - I - - - 0 I I - - I -"" I "" I I I , UI 00 - N UI UI I _CJlO 0 -.....- I 5; - - all - ...... - I ... "" -0 0 -0..... N t "" C> 0=_ all I CO...... _ I 0- CJI c..l I I'.) -- I - - - , I N . . - N 0- gUlo ..... I _ 0-_ t 1'.)....._ I 0 o-Ul_ ..... - _ -0 0- I <:> 0- "" I _ 0- CD I .::> - _ <:> N - .... 00'.......,0 ..... 0 OCD- I _ -0 ..., I CJI CJ\ I - - I - t I I I , ..... - I - I -"" I -.... , 0 "" N I N IX) ..... , 0"0 c..l I N....._ t ..... 0 I -- - I - - - t :zo 0- -0 I $............-0- "" I CJI ...... ...... 0 - _0 I r- "" 0 I a-e,...&ca- -0 , ...... UI N I "" CJI ... I co "" I ...oCDC:>~- 0 0 0- IX) '-" , COUl- I - -- I ----- I - - - I , 0 ...... , ~o<::)-C".o.t CA I 0_0 I --...... I -D p..) 0- ~ I ..... 00......,(,,11 ..0 , o -0 ..0 , "" p..) co I 0...... .0 co I OCllc::>OO ..0 I COUl_ I 0- ""- I I I - - I - I . . - - - - Florida Affordable Housing, Inc. July 22, 1991 Mr. Jeff Kurtz Ms. Lula Butler City Attorney Dir. of Community Development 310 S. E. 1st Street City of Delray Beach Suite 4 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Dear Jeff and Lula: We have been struggling to obtain permanent financing for Auburn Trace in the amount of $5,600,000 - the amount of our first mortgage short term loan from Southeast Bank, N.A. Unfortunately, by the time we got our net operating income to the point needed to justify a permanent loan of $5,600,000, the long term interest rate rose from 10% to 10-1/2%. In that connection, I enclose the following: 1. A 10 year proforma prepared by the best prospect for this loan, Patrician Financial Company/Fannie Mae, whereby they indicate that the greatest amount they could lend to us based upon the present structure of the UDAG portion of your loan, would be $4,809,000; and 2. A 10 year spreadsheet I prepared showing a revised payment schedule for the UDAG portion of the loan, whereby we could borrow $5,230,000. The problem with the present structure of the UDAG loan is that lenders want to see in every year at ieast a 1.15 debt service coverage, meaning the projected net operating income will be at least 1.15 times the amount of all scheduled debt service. When the $218,517 annual payment on the UDAG portion commences 4-1/2 years from now, we would have a smaller spread than we will have this year. On the 10 year proforma for the $4,809,000 loan, you will note that debt service coverage for all mortgages in the first year is 1.24, and the loan amount is limited by the debt service coverage in Year 5 which is the minimum, 1.15. The "Revised UDAG Payment Schedule" enables us to borrow S5,230,OOO, in which case some other lender will have to make a second mortgage loan for $370,000. , - The revised UDAG Payment Schedule is also more beneficial for the City because we commence payment on the UDAG loan 3-112 years from now instead of 4-1/2 years from now - the City receives the same dollar amount over the next 6 years, but it receives the monies earlier. I assume that this revision would be acceptable to you, and also to HUD if their approval is needed, and I think our problem is time. Lenders today are looking for reasons not to make loans, and I am afraid if we don't have an answer for this lender in 4 or 5 weeks, they might rescind their offer. We have been working with them on this loan for a year. Lenders are not standing in line to make this loan. Please call Jay FeIner or me after reviewing the enclosed schedules and conferring between yourselves and whomever else on City staff should be involved. Thank you for your consideration. Kindest personal regards, /~ Thomas G. Hinners Executive Director TGH:gb cc: Jay FeIner Roger Boos Frank McAlonan Glenn Haggerty Charlotte Durante Jeff FeIner Brian Haggerty Loretta McGhee Jim Harper JUL 2 4 : 1 ..': . . - - ','''T'' - '., U+ '. * 'Florida . ~ Affordable '1;; , Housing. Inc. July 29, 1991 Mr. Jeffrey Kurtz Ms. Lula Butler City Attorney's Office Director of Community Development 310 S.E. 1st Street City of Delray Beach Suite 4 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Dear Jeff and Lula: Another wrinkle which has come up with respect to our permanent loan commitment from Patrician Financial Company/Fannie Mae is that they will not extend their term beyond when there is a balloon payment requirement for a subordinate mortgage. The City land loan calls for a balloon payment of $530,000 on June 30th, 2004. Our requirement with our Limited Partner Investors, Boston Capital requires us to provide a permanent loan with a term expiring no sooner than December 31st, 2005. We, therefore, respectfully request a 1-1/2 year extension of the $530,000 balloon on the City's land purchase money mortgage, so that it comes due at the same time as the UDAG mortgage. It is my understanding that Jeff will be calling me as soon as possible to discuss the loan revisions we have requested. Thank you for your consideration. Kindest personal regards, ~ Thomas G. Hinners Executive Director TGH:gb cc: Mr. J. FeIner Mr. R. Boos Mr. F. McAlonan Mr. G. Haggerty Ms. C. Durante Ms. L. McGhee JUL 3 1 ~\ Mr. J. FeIner Mr. B. Haggerty ~ := I ~ ,--. ~'. .. (. -:- , . I ~::' ~=. -. : ~ ~: '. 2 ~ .J. :.. :-, :-:" oJ ~~ ,; _ :: ~ . - - - ~ 1.11 . . , . - - - - Florida Afford~lhlc Housing. 111<:- August 2, 1991 Ms. Becky O'Connor Treasurer Finance Department City of Delray Beach 100 NW 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Dear Becky: Enclosed are the following: 1. A revised Source of Funds Statement; 2. A 15 year spreadsheet setting forth the present UDAG and land loan payment schedule; and 3. A 15 year spreadsheet setting forth the new UDAG and land loan payment schedule we have requested. The Source of Funds reflects the $370,000 of additional funding needed from Auburn Trace Joint Venture to payoff the existing $5,600,000 construction loan. I also computed the compounded interest on the UDAG deferred interest and, as I've indicated, it comes to $245,956. At the end of 15 years the balance due on the loans will be as follows: First Mortgage $4,856,320 UDAG Mortgage 2,636,867 UDAG Accrued Interest 821,956 Land Mortgage 530.000 TOTAL ~8.845.14~ If we would refinance that amount fifteen years from now with a 10% loan, 25 year amortization we would need a net operating income of $1,058,678. As you can see from the spreadsheet for the new payment schedule, the net operating income after . . , - fifteen years should be in the vicinity of $1,500,000, so we have a considerable cushion. Please call me after you have had a chance to review the enclosed schedules. Kindest regards, ..~ L ~ Thomas G. Hinners Executive Director TGH:gb HI . , AUBURN TRACE SOURCE OF FUNDS - I. First Mor12a2e: Patrician ATJV Amount $5.230.000 $370.000 Interest Rate 10.5% $10.5% Amortization 30 years 30 years Term 15 years 15 years Annual Debt Service $574.090 $40.614 Payments on the Auburn Trace Joint Venture (ATJV) portion of this loan shall only be made to the extent that they do not" bring the debt service ratio ofall mortgages to Net Operating Income below 1.15. with upaid amounts plus compounded interest thereon accumulating until there is sufficient cash flow to make such payments. Of necessity. the payments will be made annually after the annual audit has determined the amount available for such payment. II. UDAG Mort2a2e: Amount $ 3.840.000 Interest Rate 3.0% Amortization. Term & Debt Service - No payments for first 5 years. with deferred interest of $576.000 plus compounded interest thereon of $245.956 paid after 15th year; 2S year amortization of $218.517 per year and balloon payment of $2.636.867 after 15th year. III. Delrav Beach 20% Match Amount $ 768.000 Interest Rate 0% Amortization & Term 15 years Annual Debt Service $ 51.200 IV. Purchase Money Morttue Amount $ 720,000 Interest Rate 0% Amortization & Term - $65.000 at closing; 5 annual payments of $25,000 payable on first five anniversary dates of closing. and a balloon payment of $530,000 in the 15th year. V. City Grant $200.000 towards cost of site improvements VI. Total Financin2: First Mortgage $ 5.600.000 UDAG Loan 3.840.000 20 % Match 768.000 Purchase Money Mortgage (Less $65.(00) 655.000 Delray Grant 200.000 Equity 4.611.040 TOT AL COST $15.674.040 at-sourc MEfJIORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY HANAGER!()i. i SUBJ3CT: AGENDA ITEM # ({q - MEETING OF AUGUS'r 13, 1991 CHANGE ORDER NO. l/DEES CONTRACTING, INC. DATE: August 7, 1991 This Change Order represents a decrease of the contract price by $6,461 for the rehabilitation of the 1/2 Million Gallon Water Storage Tank by implementing recommendations made by the project Engineer. In April 1991 new O.S.H.A. regulations went into affect which governs tank cleaning, surface preparation, repairs, coating, etc. As a result, improvements to the tank will cost less than originally estimated. Recommend approval of Change Order No. 1 to the contract with Dees Contracting, Inc. decreasing the original contract price by $6,461 by implementing recommendations made by the project Engineer. ~ U ~:i " ~:i 1 .. . &,;. ." I;; j ", t-:. ;_ '"t ,,' r 1_1 l H U I'; J . ,_I '"t . PBSJ POST, e M~i 'IE lRJ "'iC BUCKLEY, ~:_A,"."" ",c, SCHUH &. \ RC h rr~:..:u R.[ IERNfGAN. INC. August 8, 1991 Mr. Mark Gabriel, P.E. Assistant Director of Environmental Services/City Engineer City of Delray Beach 434 South Swinton Avenue Delray Beach. Florida 33444 RE: Elevated 'Vater Storage Tank Rehabilitation City of Delray Beach, Florida Project No. 91-23 PBS&J Project :"Jo. 10.176.04 Dear Mr. Gabriel: As a. follow up to the conversations I have had this week with Mr. Howard Wight concerning the above subject project, please be advised that it is our rerorrunendation that the contracts for this project with Dees Contracting, Inc. be executed subject to the following conditions: A All tank cleaning, surface preparatio~ repairs, coating, etc. will be conducted in accordance with OSHA regulations and guidelines. B. The exterior coating system will be at a minimum: la. Water-blasting NACE STD.RP-Ol-72 (entire tank). lb. Commercial Blast cleaning per SSPC-SP-6 (all areas of visual rusting and rust scale). 2a. First Coat: Spot prime all areas receiving commercial blast with: Surface Tolerant Epoxy Primer B62HW6/BS8VW2 Sherwin Williams Product or Equal 4.5 - 6.0 mils D.F.T. 2b. Second Coat: Kern Kromik Universal Metal Primer (Entire Tank) B50WZ1Off-White Sherwin Williams Product or Equal 1.2-2.0 mils D.F.T. 5)00 W CYl'RtS5 S11tE.ET, SUITE 300, TAMPA, F:'ORlOA 33607 TEL; (813\ 877-1275 . FAX (813) 8n.<1I79 I I '_' _' - - - - - - tv . ,.... _I 2c. Third Coat: Hi-Solids Polyurcthane (Entire Tank) B65W301/B60V30 Sherwin Williams Product or Equal 2.0 . 4.0 mils D.F.T. This coating system is contingent on the coati.ng system materia:s manufacturer certifying that the system is appropriate for the, intended application. C. In consideration for the change in tbe exterior coating system, the City of Delray Beach will receive a crcdit (Change Order #1) for $ 6,461.00 in accordance with Mr. Dees' letter of August 8, 1991. If you have any questions or need additional information, please give me a call. Very truly ~ .. '., ~.~ /<~ ' ./ /2;:'" .:;: -- /' .,/ C. Edwin Copeland; Jr., P:E. Senior Project Manager Attachments CEe 10.276.40 . ENV:DELRAY -. - CHANG E ORDER No. 1 Dated AlI~lIst 9. , 199 L I Project No. 90-01 Bid 1191-23 Project Name: Elevated Water Storage Tank Funding Source- 441-5161-536-60.31 ~ Owner: City of Delray Beach, Florida Contractor: DEES Constracting, Inc. Contract Date: J To: DEES Contracting, Inc. , Contractor You are directed to make the following changes in the subject contract: Miscellaneous changes to scope of work on Elevated Tank due to existing Red Lead Primer and new OSHA reeulations. Changes are made per Post. Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan, Inc. (Consultant) recommendations. Changes are per attached, Schedule "A". , which changes are more specifically described in the attached amended plans, drawings, and specifica tions. The reason for, the change is as follows: Existing Red Lead Primer and new O.S.H.A regulations per Engineers recommendation. OSHA Regulations went into effect April of 1991. The contract price and contract time shall be adjusted beeause of such changes as follows: A~ Contract Price 1. Contract price prior to this change order: '$259 ,111. 00 Page One of Two Pages , ,~ ~ ,..... I ..' CHANGE ORDER f 1 .. ......_,~~........-_........ ~. .-.... ... .-.....-.-.. - _. -.. . d-ecr-ease 2. Net ~resu1ting from this change order: $6 ,461. 00 3. Current contract price Including this change order: $251,650.00 B. . Contract Time . .' 1. Contract time prior to this change order: 150 Calendar Days I ~; 2. Net Incrense resulting from. thIs change order: o Calendar Davs ~. Current contract time including this change order: 150 Calend~r Days . .. . City of Delray Beach, Florida, OWNER , , By: . . Attest: THOMAS E. LYNCH Mayor Ci ty Clerk City of Delray Beach - Approved as to form: City Attorney - The above chMges are accepted on , 1991..-- I understand that all the provisions of the Contract Document related to Project No. 90-01 . Bid 1191-23 which are not inconsistent with. the terms of .:this Change Order shall remain in effect and apply to all work undertaken pursuant to this Change Order. . Witness: , . . . DEES Contractin2. ln~ ' CONTRACTOR By: As to Contractor Title . . . . I ':' . Page Two of Two Pages . ---,,'. - . Schedule "A" August 8, 1991 I. TANK EXTERIOR A. Water blast entire tank with high volume $.50 psf pressure washer SSPC-6 water blast with sand injection $.84 psf rust areas only PAINT SYSTEM - Surface tolerance epoxy primer (Sherwin $.36 psf Williams B62HW6/B58VW2) Kem Klonike, Universal Metal Primer (Sherwin $.25 psf Williams B50WZ2) 1 1/2 - 2 mils D.F.T. High Build Asphaltic Polyurethane Top Coat $.29 psf (Sherwin Williams B60V2, B65 Series) 2.0 - 4.0 mils D.F.T. Total units psf $2.24psf Subtotal A $2.24 psf x 20,000 sf = $44,800 B. Add structural repairs included $37,300 in bid Net total item I $82,100 II. TANK INTERIOR Same as original quote $59,800 III. ADDITIONAL REPAIRS Same as original quote $50,000 IV. SHROUDING Original quote $25,000 Less: reduction for partial (12,500) shrouding Net Total Item IV $12,500 V. REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL EXTERIOR original quote $24,000 Less: reduction for spot (12,000) blasting only $12,000 . Schedule "A" Page 2 VI. ~EMOVAL AND DISPOSAL INTERIOR Same as original quote $13,000 VII; ADDITIONAL NECESSARY FOR HAZARDOUS REMOVAL* Based on spot blasting Provide air monitoring, employee medical records, personnel protection, public protection and all other items necessary to comply with EPA and OSHA regulations $23,250 Total Adjusted Contract $251,650 No extension of time will be necessary. The above referenced change will result in a total contract cost of $251,650. This represents a net savings of $6,461.00. --.^--< , . MEMORANDUM ~ TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER b7i) SUBJECT: j\GENDA ITEM # ~!!- - MEETING OF AUGUST 13/ 1991 RESOLUTION NO. 62-91 DATE: August 7 / 1991 This is a Resolution vacating and abandoning 10 feet of right-of-way on N.W. 18th Avenue located on the east side of Congress Avenue between Lake Ida Road and Atlantic Avenue. The abandonment of right-of-way is required as a condition of approval of the site plan for the proposed Congress Industrial Service Center. Upon staff review of the site plant it was noted that a 60 foot right-of-way existed along N.W. 18th Avenue. As the regulations, (pre-Land Development Regulations) required only 50 feet of right-of-way, the petitioner was advised to submit a petition for abandonment of the 10 feet. The right-of-way had previously been deeded to Palm Beach County, therefore, this abandonment could not be processed until the right-of-way was under the City's jurisdiction. The documentation is properly prepared and has been reviewed by the City utilities and outside Utility companies and no objection was received. The Planning and Zoning Board at their April 12th meeting recommend approval of the abandonment. Recommend approval of Resolution No. 62-91 abandoning 10 feet of right-of-way on N.W. 18th Avenue located on the Bast side of Congress Avenue between Lake Ida Road and Atlantic Avenue. '" , . i RESOLUTION NO. 62-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, VACATING AND ABANDONING 10 FEET RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING WITHIN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, DELRAY BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; SAID PROPERTY BEING LOCATED BETWEEN LAKE IDA ROAD AND ATLANTIC AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF CONGRESS AVENUE, DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach is the fee-simple owner of the 10 feet of right-of-way lying within Section 18, Township 46 South, Range 43 East; and, WHEREAS, STS Land Associates, L.P. , applicant, has made ap- plication for abandonment of the 10 feet of right-of-way lying within Section 18, Township 46 South, Range 43 East; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of De1ray Beach, Florida, finds that its interest in the described property is no longer needed for the public good and deems it to be in the best interests of the City of Delray Beach to vacate and abandon said portion of right-of-way, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That pursuant to Chapter 177.101(5) and Chapter 166 of the Florida Statutes, it is hereby determined to vacate and abandon all right and interest it holds to the following real property: A parcel of land in the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 18, Township 46 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: The West 10.00 feet of the following described parcel: Commencing at a point in the south line of the North Half (N 1/2) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of said Section 18; said line being hereinafter referred to as Line "A", where said line intersects the westerly right-of-way line of the Seaboard Airline Railroad; thence, northerly along said right-of-way line, a distance of 723 feet, when measured at right angles to said Line "A"i thence westerly parallel to said Line "A", a distance of 300 feet to the Point of Beginning and the southeast corner of the parcel of land herein described. Thence northerly parallel to said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 171.00 feet; thence, westerly, a distance of 35.01 feet; thence, southerly parallel to said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 171.24 feet; thence easterly, parallel to said Line "A", a distance of 35.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Said parcel being the same west 10.00 feet of that certain 35.00 foot road right-way for Northwest 18th Avenue as recorded in Official Records Book 6815, Page 1657, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. The above-described parcel contains an 0.0393 acre parcel of land. j;H . II i I The subject property is located between Lake Ida Road and Atlantic Avenue on the east side of Congress Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 13th day of August, 1991. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk -2- Res. No. 62-91 ;., ~ ~.~. '.vr ..."34.r ~ " '0. I'~ -",. ) J . -, ,,'tl., '~:"".~ ......, t,.._ . I.,,,,'J'~I....!..J. {'o ~t._ OO~SO~ wAY . ~ . . of' -~ Abandonment Congress lr:dustrial Service 1" = 300' Scale 8 PLAT WOLF 2!>O - .-2"--_ ___ _ __ - -- - ------- -- .-- 0 N .' , , t - 2.?. 25 I .. ~~~ t 20' 1104_" ..I I Iti I ~~ ::. .... ~ I ~ 1 I I ~ I ~ I ~ I 27 ~ "1 .. ;, :: .. ... , I - ______~!'J' I - - ----- -- -- ----------------- .t' .,. C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER E. DEARDEN, PLANNER II AND ZONING DEPT. ~ -u'~ffu\ ID J. KOVACS, DIRE OR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 **CONSENT AGENDA** ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF N.W. 18TH AVE., IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE CONGRESS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER PROJECT ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of the abandonment of portion of the right of way of N.W. 18th Avenue adjacent to the proposed Congress Industrial Service Center, located between Congress Ave. and N.W. 18th Avenue, and north of N.W. 1st Street. BACKGROUND: The abandonment of the right of way is required as a condition of approval of the site plan for the proposed Congress Industrial Service Center. Upon review by staff of the site plan, there was noted a 60 foot right of way for N.W. 18th Ave. adjacent to this project. As the current regulations, (Pre L.D.R. IS) required only 50 feet for right of way, staff instructed the projects' agent to file a petition of abandonment for 10 feet. The right of way was formally deeded to Palm Beach County. As of April 2, 1991 the right of way was deeded to the City of Delray Beach per Resolution R-91-403. This abandonment could not be processed until the right of way was under the City's jurisdiction. The documentation is properly prepared and has been reviewed by the City utilities and outside utility companies and no objection was received. The abandonment is now ready for City Commission action. City Commission Documentation Abandonment of portion of right of way of N.W. 18th Ave., Congress Industrial Service Center Page 2 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board, on April 12th, 1991, recommended approval of the abandonment. Attached for your information is a copy of the Planning and Zoning staff report. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approval of the abandonment of a portion of N.W. 18th Avenue as noted in the adoption of Resolution -91 Attachments: * P&Z staff report cover sheet * Reduction copy of the right of way to be abandoned * Resolution to be provided by City Clerk ked/#7ciscrw. <<.1' ,ru (",\.1........ .'t' .;.~.'..: ,\ltJ ."'- / t191'/81 UllIP'~ '''II 3N ';lUnISI:3 "J.L__ PI!OJI!Il~ ;lUIIl!Y pJI!IKlH;l$ ';lUn MI~ IS;I"" , ~ ~ ~ _ . C :.: ~ - - .::: ~ y (n~ :l88d '(Ol ~ooa spJ(y');)~ (1I!J!JJO) O' J! J- _lU;lUJX83 SS;)Jt3.SS;)JS~ ~-, ~ . ~z :Q ~nu~^v 4181 'M"N '" ~ .5 - .oo'ILI -....l ,~ ~ ':MY 4181 'M.'N wJO:l M/)J ~ Z " .~ .-, ~ ;r; ~ ~ ,fi:L "'0 tj ~ J! ~o ~ >"'0 ~ ?~ = ~ Om 5 "" m.c 0 .. :t >. ;.... .,...t.EeO ... iJ ~ ~:; -a l-I.~ ~ ~ OC -'.",..N. ~ ~ Q) . ~7;c.. 0 CIl..c 0::: _ ",,- e~- ;:l~ '0 _c..;..,~ -- c;;:;~ "'Ou!le ~t:= ~jt ~ ,g f' , "i ~ Q) ~ ~ ~. 0.,., ~ -:: ~ '" '" :.0 - H . U -, ~ U Q.. " - :il ""- ~CIl"'O coo Co-z .,.,.C-:;OO CIll-l....... IL"'O. '. ;..uc; - CIl~ ~C..o~" ~5 .,..j::Q f.-: Q) !:l 'i. .= ~....l _c.:~ l-Il-I -a-~~....: x~ ~-. ()l)Q) ~-e:. r-..uS '~"O C' ~~ C\~ ~ z:: 0 00 o~ 00"0 Z -.:'. U Q) 0 ~ ,e. V) U .:;, "'0 Z CIl Q) Q) CIl U o .~ 0.> o l-I l-I Q) ~U) .96'(Ll 'M SE.SS.OO 'N ."" 0)(.)).00 'N - ~nu~^v Ss~J~UOJ W.../- 7l~ ~ .. -- -- . . M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER "fJv{ SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 1?S - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/CONGRESS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER DATE: AUGUST 9, 1991 We have received a request for final plat approval for Congress Industrial Service Center. The subject property is located on the north side of N.W. 1st Street, between Congress Avenue and the S.A.L. Railroad. Boundary plat action is required as a condition of the approved site plan for this development. Prior to consideration of the final plat, a portion of N.W. 18th Avenue, previously dedicated to Palm Beach County, needs to be abandoned. That action is elsewhere on your agenda. The plat is properly prepared, engineering plans filed, and necessary permits obtained. The Planning and Zoning Board at their April 15th meeting recommended approval. Recommend approval of the final plat for Congress Industrial Service Center. I.U . . f"7"'~:' LI:? -, ./ C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: HARDEN, CITY MANAGER THRU: ~R DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING FROM: PAUL DORLING, PLANNER IiJt. l.. v SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 CONGRESS INDUSTRIAL PLAT ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of a final plat. BACKGROUND: This boundary plat is required as a condition of approval of the Congress Industrial Service building site plan granted by the City Commission on October 9, 1990 (attached is the Planning and Zoning Department staff report cover and exhibit). Prior to consideration of the final plat by the City Commission a portion (10') of N.W. 18th Avenue previously dedicated to Palm Beach County was to be abandoned. The abandonment request is also before the City Commission on this agenda. The plat is properly prepared, engineering plans filed, and necessary permits obtained and is now ready for City Commission action. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the final plat at their meeting of September 24, 1990 and recommended approval subject to conditions. One of these conditions involved the previously mentioned abandonment of 10' of N.W. 18th Avenue. The Board reviewed and recommended approval of the abandonment at their meeting of April 15, 1991. All other conditions have been met. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approval of the boundary plat for Congress Industrial Service Center plat. Attachment: * P&Z Staff Report Cover Sheet of September 24, 1990 * Boundary Plat Exhibit cip#39pd -I ,~ PLANN'ING 8 ZOJ\' ,~G BORRD - - STAFF REPORT - - CITY OF OELRAY BEACH MEETING o::lTE: Seotember 24. 1990 AGeo:t ITEM: II.A. Ilr~:Site and Develooment Plan, Con2ress Industrial Service Center, ConRress North of N.W. 1st Street. 2~ - . @ . 8 ..- . DATA: Owner...........................Michael Swerdlow Companies, Inc. Agent.. .........................Richard V. Reikenis Location........................East side of Congress Avenue between Atlantic Avenue and Lake Ida Road. Property Size...................1.719 Acres City Land Use Plan..............Commerce City Zoning.....................MI (Medium Industrial) Adjacent Zoning.................North, East, South, and West of the subject property are all zoned MI. Existing Land Use...............Vacant Proposed Land Use...............Light manufacturing, office, and storage. Water Service...................Existing 8" water main along NW 18th Avenue. IrE}{: II.. Sewer Service....................No sewer exists to the site. A main extension will be required. , "" -- -- -- .. . '" q QL Congress Avenue ~ i4U4~ - --r-i,oo'SS'3S.w-:- - r- 1I~7.60' ~ I~ Alm/llllN^1 RIGIIT-OF.WAY I'OI{ I 16 c..:ol'H.Hr.."S ^VI':';UI; (OIHeIA'- HU'OIU)S I ~ - llOOK }))O,I'AGpi ISl2 ANI> 'S1S).-ISA I .. 174 (DEED) . ____ - C~N. 00.55'35" W, 173,96' (SlJRVE.Y) . __ - -\ I NUj.UYm ow' ~ ~ ~I I _ ,.....,:: C:I I ~ "'Co C .,0. _ - 0 -. 8 r ~ IbJ I ! :><" :J -r ~" .A' 0. ~L ji; "'C () . l I 3 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ (") -to) 'oQ 'D 0 .......... ::1 . . z '< g: ~ (7) w - ~ Vl 'D 00 1:'1 . .. "\:I">E' a Cfl cr. - I c;:{;, tT1~~ Cf.l '-'; ~ OJ'" . v>Jo. Z ~ t e " l g. a- ~ ;: ~ H !J'l t :- ~ 2.1'\ Ii ~ VI ~ ~ 0 8 : o~ ~n. ~~ C ~.....O'> r'~ ~ a. ~ .. .... t/lO ~ c::: ~' , ,:.,..:, -; r ~. :s C m ~ ~ . - Ot/l "'"' "\:It:;':;:O q t;: ;:elm..2 ~ z ~ rn~ "0 8 !I Q ~c:::;<: H g g: ~ <' I I (3 3. a. ~ -< -- t:: g:; :r ~ ...... rii ..... 0-:;:0 _. ~ ...... '" n.J :=l -, Co. 0 t.; ...... tt n.;;:':n t: ...... . Cfl '" .......so.. "'I r:;':T - ~ ;::;! 1:'1 - --. - 0 - ~ '0- ~; :::d o := ~ I "..... 0 ~ N <:: :: J-. n!(..... n - 7' H r; 0: 8 S:'" ,.....,""" (") o I....@:.:- f:o "'C 0 1:'1 ~ I 0.-..:....., ., 0. !:; t::) ." r: - !!. (") ~ I gH' ~ ~ g'r- 1:'1 - ,....n Z ob ~ Vl \:>;. \II ><";:) 1:'1 a l 0 ~ ~ 9'0. ~ - I 3 "'C n 9 u1 00 n "'0 "tl :. ItA:;' ~3 t""' pc > v.'U > ~ Vl I l:'", -Ll 1-3 gel ; ri ......;:) t;. I o.c '< r. r 723' ~ t - Ibm . ,..r z - ~ z i5 ~. - g C/l ~ :T rn~ . r: ___ L-.- ::J __ ::]" 0 ~~ W ~~ ~ ~~J . _. o ~ ~ ln~n:ss-Egress Easement :. ;r 0 (OHicial Records BUOK 203, Pa~e S41) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ c "" :J . ~ .1.. ..: ""' _ WJ;~ ' (joe, Seaboard Airline Railroad ~ 1- _ _ I J , ~Sl une NE 114, Seclion 18/46/43 J '~\'''--- \\ N.UU'S3"3".W, 2702.().l , "- ! '\ -~ ------ ;;" . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER ~ SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # l?~ - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 RESOLUTION NO. 59-91 DATE: August 7, 1991 This is a Resolution vacating and abandoning a 16 foot alleyway lying within Block 7, Rio Del Rey in conjunction with the Ninth Street Plaza aka Shoney's development. The abandonment of the alleyway is required as a condition of the final plat and site plan approval for this project. With the development of the site, the alley area will be used for parking. The existing utilities within the alley are to remain and replacement easements will be dedicated during replat of the property. The petition for abandonment has been accepted and has been reviewed and approved by all City utilities and outside utility agencies. The Planning and Zoning Board at their June 17th meeting recommended approval of the abandonment subject to the condition that the abandonment resolution be recorded simultaneously with the plat. The request for final plat approval is also on your agenda for action, and thus, this requirement will be satisfied should the Commission approve that action. Recommend approval of Resolution No. 59-91 subject to the condition as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board. . i i I RESOLUTION NO. 59-91 1 i ,I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF I '1 DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, VACATING AND ABANDONING A 16 FOOT ALLEYWAY LYING WITHIN BLOCK 7, RIO DEL REY, A I SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 12, PAGE 84 OF 'I THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. :1 II WHEREAS, S.E. 9th Street Associates, Ltd. , is the fee-simple owner of All of Block 7, Rio Del Rey, a Subdivision as recorded in Plat i Book 12, Page 84 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; and, WHEREAS, M. Mark Marsh, Agent, has made application for aban- il donment of a 16 foot alleyway lying within Block 7, Rio Del Rey; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, II Florida, finds that its interest in the described property is no longer j needed for the public good and deems it to be in the best interests of il the City of Delray Beach to vacate and abandon said alleyway, 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: I, [I Section 1. That pursuant to Chapter 177.101(5) and Chapter 166 'I of the Florida Statutes, it is hereby determined ,to vacate and abandon i all right and interest it holds to the following real property: 1 I A 16 foot alleyway lying within Block 7, Rio Del Rey, a Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 12, Page 84 of il II the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. I The above-described parcel contains 0.165 I a acre I parcel of land. i i I The subject property is located on the north side of I I S.E. 10th Street, between S.E. 5th Avenue and S.E. 6th Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 13th day of August, 1991. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk , '" . LI( /;lv} I C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER FROM: KATHLEEN E. DEARDEN, PLANNER II DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING / ./-' ~. . '\1:1 l000__~~.) .~' "-': THROU: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUG. 13, 1991 **CONSENT AGENDA** ALLEY ABANDONMENT, BLOCK 7, RIO DEL REY, IN ASSOCIATION WITH NINTH STREET PLAZA PLAT ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of the abandonment of a 16 foot alley in Block 7, Rio Del Rey. BACKGROUND: The abandonment of the 16 foot alley is required as a condition of the final plat and site plan approval for the Ninth Street Plaza aka Shoney's project. With the development of the site, the alley has been petitioned for abandonment in order to utilitize the alley area for parking. The existing utilities within the alley are to remain and replacement easements will be dedicated on the replat of the property. The petition for abandonment has been accepted and has been reviewed and approved by all City utilities and outside utility agencies. The petition for the alley abandonment is now ready for City Commission action. " City Commission Documentation Alley Abandonment, Block 7, Rio Del Rey Page 2 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this petition at its meeting of June 17, 1991. The Board recommended approval with conditions. The only outstanding condition is that the abandonment not be consummated until the plat is ready for recording. FINDINGS: In accordance with Section 2.4.6(0)(5) all findings have been met. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approval of the abandonment of the 16 foot alley within Block 7, Rio Del Rey, more particularly described per Resolution 91- , with the following condition: The abandonment resolution must be recorded simultaneously with the plat of Ninth Street Plaza. Attachment: *Resolution to be provided by City Clerks office ked/#10shonalcc " CITY COMMISSION CITY OF DELRAY BEACH' ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: August 13, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: - ITEM: Abandonment of the 16 foot alley within Block 7, Rio Del Rey Subdivision ~ I 3t Q: UJ ~ Lit · 1M I 3t ~~I ..J ~ en < _~~II 0 (.) < 0::: t- Z ---_. - GENERAL DATA: Owner.......................... .City of Delray Beach, Florida Agent...........................M. Mark Marsh Location........................North of S.E. 10th Street and south of S.E. 9th Street, between S.E. 5th Avenue (Federal Highway Southbound) and S.E. 6th Avenue (Federal Highway Northbound). Property Size........ ...........0.165 City Land Use Plan..............General Commercial City Zoning.....................GC (General Commercial) and AC (Auto Related Commercial) Existing Land Use...............Public Right-of-Way Development Proposal............Consolidation of parcels for automobile dealership and proposed retail. Request. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Abandonment of 16 I alley right-of-way, within Block 7 of the Rio Del Rey subdivision. . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER tJil SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # t6Lt - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/9TH STREET PLAZA (SHONEY'S) DArrE : August 7 , 1991 We have received a request for final plat approval for the 9th Street Plaza (Shoney's) located on the north side of S.E. 10th Street between S.E. 5th and S.E. 6th Avenues. The existing block that is proposed for replatting is known as a part of Block 7 , Rio Del Rey. The property is platted with 26 lots and a 16 foot, north/south alley dividing the block. The north half of the block has two existing buildings upon it and the alley is unimproved in this area. The south half of the block is unimproved. In the proposed site plan the existing buildings on the north half of the property are maintained, thus creating a boundary lot. The Shoney's building, a future retail building, and associated parking are proposed for the south half of the property. The alley, which is to be abandoned, will be utilized as parking and access, with an interconnecting drive for the two lots. All existing and proposed utilities have been accommodated on the replat. The Planning and Zoning Board at their June 17th meeting certified the final plat. Recommend approval of the final plat for the 9th Street Plaza (Shoney's) located on the north side of S.E. 10th Street between S.E. 5th and S.E. 6th Avenues. C/< . t~/c 1 C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER FROM: KATHLEEN E. DEARDEN, PLANNER II DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING C ^ ,bjJJjL X,tVL THROUGH: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 **CONSENT AGENDA** FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR NINTH STREET PLAZA AKA SHONEY'S ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of the final plat for Ninth Street Plaza. BACKGROUND: The existing block that is proposed for replatting is known as a part of Block 7, Rio Del Rey Shores. The property is platted with 26 lots and a 16 foot, north/south alley dividing the block. The north half of the block is built with two existing buildings and the alley is improved in this area. There are existing utilities in the alley which service the abutting buildings. The south half of the block is unimproved. The proposed site plan depicts retaining the existing buildings in the north half of the property and creating a boundary lot. The south half of the site is proposed to create a second lot with the Shoney's building, a future retail building and associated parking. The alley is to be abandoned and utilitized as parking and assess, with an interconnecting drive for the two lots. All existing and proposed utilities have been accomodated on the replat. , The final plat petition is complete and ready for City Commission action. '" . City Commission Documentation Final Plat, Ninth Street Plaza Page 2 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board has reviewed this final plat at its meeting of June 17, 1991. The Board certified that the final plat was in compliance with the approved preliminary plat with conditions. All conditions have been meet. FINDINGS: The final plat is consistent with the findings associated with the preliminary plat. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approval of the final plat for Ninth Street Plaza. Attachment: * Copy of Planning & Zoning Staff Report Cover Sheet ked:#10shoncc PLANNING & ZQ~ING BOARD rl . .-.. C-' " ) CITY OF DELRAY BEACH --- STAFF REPORT --- MEETING DATE: June 17, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: IV.A. ITEM: Subdivision Plat, Shoney's/Wallace. Q: LaJ ..... < - ~ - ...J - ~ - I N Vl - < - 0 - ~ U - ~ < I 0::: - ~ ..... - .- nutn Z V A ..:1- GENERAL DATA: Owner...........................S.E. 9th Street Associates Agent. ........ .... ..............Mark Marsh Location........................Northeast corner of Federal Highway (southbound) and S.E. lOth Street. Property Size...................2.76 Acres City Land Use Plan..............General Commercial City Zoning.....................GC (General Commercial) and AC (Auto Related Commercial) Adjacent Zoning.................Eo!lst, west and north of the subject property is zoned GC (General Commercial). Land to the south is zoned PC (Planned Commercial) and CF (Community facilities) . Existing Land Use...............Vacant on the south, former auto use on the north. Proposed Land Use...............Restaurant and free standing retail on the south, potential reuse of the auto facilities on the north. Water Service...................A new 8" water main will connect to the existing 12" main, which runs along the east side of S.E. 6th Avenue. Sewer Service...................A 8" sanitary sewer line runs north/south through the center of IV.A. the block. ," . . NINTH STREET PLAZA PLAT If ~E 9"GTREET ! \r, ~ ~ ~ n9M'~ ~h~~Y U" ~ ~-- //u7r II' ~ I fJ' \ -- .. J I"S,,1!9'Z9-"~"e' J~' ~ ~""tJ' ~ '0;:,. ~ ~-' ~ ~ ~ 11 La T I' Z ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , ' ~, ,,~ ~ ,'<:l "" ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~~ , " ~, \... , ~ ~ ~ "ll~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I .. ~~ ~ ~ """ ~ I ~~ l~, ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~~... ~ ~ "'" "," I 'd ~ ~ , c . ~~ I "- ~ ~ t", ...... · ., ~ ! ~ t:- ~\ ~ I ~ ~ ~_"l ~ ~ ~ ~ "I ~:-.;:. ~ ,~>;I\i ~ 'l" ',,~'I; "i " ~ I //.7.44' ~~<:: ~ \r\' ,>"illr 5t1P-.r9"'''"';: ~ s 'J'"~9'''F",-, I ~ ~! ~.... /5/. ?th' I , ~ I " ~ ?M~' (,or I - ~.~' I' ~ I, ~ i~ . t ;:s ~ : . I~ ~ ~ i ~ I.' I ~ i'IJ "I L tJ T / ~ !. '\I" i \ri : ':. ,,; 1 ~~ ,\ ~t I ~ ~ ,~~ . I ~ I I~ ~ I "-i '<: '" It..., , ' ~ 'I' I I I ' , ~ ~Sd' ~i I I ~ ~I ~ I t ~( ~f~l~ b I ~I" , I pOli61 I ~ ~ " ' '. '...' , '~~ ' I I I ~ :~~~",~~. ~~ r , 3;;' I r ,.-/7:-k ,.,..;/... ,,; ?tJ. i ',' e'9 /.?57. tiP' I ' '" c-""-....... I ~~ {'-iJ- -,<I.5"'""'",,,'"Jt'-- --- ~- ,,- -- IZ4J5'" - --- - C-? I ~ I ' jl (;Y..'i'-. ..v.' 9,1"",,'''''''11/ 2;3552' '-T"RACr A ~'" c:~ C' ~I "-sw CtJRA/a' ~I 1/\ -+- ,,' """of' /7 '" 'C~ _ ~ ___ - - ,_J - . - € 5 E. /tJrA/ 9T.REET I i I , . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGERtJit-l( SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 1? _ MEETING OF AUGUST 13 I 1991 RESOLUTION NO. 60-91 DATE: August 7, 1991 This item is a Resolution assessing costs for abatement action required to board up an unsafe building located on property at 607 S.W. 9th street. The Resolution sets forth the actual costs incurred and provides the mechanism to attach a lien on this property in the event the assessment of $445.50 remains unpaid. Recommend approval of Resolution No. 60-91 assessing costs to board up an unsafe building located on property at 607 S.W. 9th street. . . RESOLUTION NO. 60-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 165, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS FOR ABATEMENT ACTION REGARDING AN UNSAFE BUILDING ON LAND(S) LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH; SETTING OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABATEMENT AND LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH ACTION; PROVIDI~G FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND INTEREST ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE RECQRDING OF THIS RESOLU- TION, AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO BE A LIEN UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR UNPAID ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE MAILING OF NOTICE. WHEREAS, the Building Official or his designated representative has, pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances, declared the existence of an unsafe building upon certain lots or parcels of land, described in the list attached hereto and made a part hereof, for violation of the building codes and building requirements adopted by Chapter 165 and those Codes adopted in Chapter 96 of the Code of Ord- inances; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, the Building Official or his designated representative has inspected said land (s) and has determined that an unsafe building existed in accordance with the standards set forth in Chapter 165 and/or Chapter 96 of the Code of Ordinances, and did furnish the respective owner(s) of the land(s) described in the attached list with written notice of unsafe building and detailed report of conditions and notice to vacate as the Building Official determined that the building was manifestly unsafe and is considered a hazard to life and public welfare pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances describing the nature of the violations and sent notices that the build- ing was to be vacated and that the building was to be repaired or demolished; work must be begun within sixty (60) days and all work must be completed within such time as the Building Official determines, said notice also advised that all appeals must be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of the notice and failure to file an appeal or to make the repairs required that the Building Official would haye the. authority to have the building demolished from the date of the sa~d not~ce; and, WHEREAS, all the notice requirements contained within Chapter 165 have been complied with; and, W~EREAS, .neither an appeal to the Board of Construction Appeals ~r.corre7t~~e act~?n.was undertaken in accordance with the order of the .h~ef B~~~d~ng Off~c~al; therefore pursuant to Section 165.41 the Build- ~ng Off~c~al caused the abatement action to be done; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager of th C' pursuant to Section 165 42 of th C d ef ~t~ of Delray Beach has, ?elray Beach, submitted' to the C~t 0 e 0, ?rd~nances of the City of ~ncurred in abating said conditio y Comm~ss~on a ,report of the costs the costs per parcel of land' In ads aforesa~d, sa~d report indicating ~nvo ve ; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission f th . pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of 00 d' e C~ty ,of Delray Beach, cost of said condition against sa'd r ~nances des~res to assess the ~ property owner(s). NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RES CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FgL~~S:BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE . Section 1. That assessments in the amount of as shown by the report of the City Manager of the City of Delray a copy of ~hich is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby lev~ed aga~ns~ the parcells) of land described in said report and in t,he amount(s) 7nd7- cated thereon. Said assessments so levied shall, ~f not pa~d w~th~n thirty (30) days after mailing of the notice described in Section 165.42 become a lien upon the respective lots and parcells) of land descr~bed in said report, of the same nature and to ~he s~me extent as the l~en for general city taxes and shall be collect~ble ~n ,the same manner and with the same penalties and under the same prov~s~ons as to sale and foreclosure as City taxes are collectible. Section 2. That such assessments shall be legal, valid and binding obligations upon the property against which said assessments are levied. Section 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach is hereby directed to immediately mail by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the owner (s) of the prope:r;ty, as such ownership appears upon the records of the County Tax Assessor, notice(s) that the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has levied an assess- ment against said property for the cost of abatement action regarding an unsafe building by the thirty (30) days after the mailing date of said notice of assessment, after which a lien shall be placed on said proper- ty, and interest will accrue at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum, plus reasonable attorney's fees and other costs of collecting said sums. Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days from the date of adoption and the assessment (s) contained herein shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice of said assessment(s), after which a lien shall be placed on said property(s), and interest shall accrue at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum plus reasonable attorney's fee and other costs of collection. Section 5. That in the event that payment has not been re- ceived by ~he City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the not~ce of assessment, the City Clerk is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this resolution in the public records of Palm Beach C~unty, Florida, ~nd upon t~e date and time of recording of the certi- f~ed copy of th~s resolut~on a lien shall become effective on the Subject property which shall secure the cost of abatement, interest at the rate of 6%, and collection costs including a reasonable attorney's fee. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the day of , 1991. ATTEST: MAY 0 R City Clerk . - 2 - Res. No. 60-91 - NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT Date TO: Sharon A. Cunningham a/k/a Sharon A. Cushnie ADDRESS: 12 SW 8th Court, Delray Beach, FI 33444 PROPERTY: 607 SW 9th Street, Delray Beach, FI 33444 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E20' of Lot 106 and W40' of Lot 107, Plat of Delray Mana Addition to Delray, according to Plat Book 12, Page 59 of the official reco of Palm Beach County, Florida You, as the record owner of, or holder of an interest in, the above- described property are hereby advised that a cost of $445.50 by resolutic of the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, dated , 1989, has been levied against the above-described property. The costs were incurred as a result of a nuisance abatement action regarding the above-described property. You were given notice on 3-19-91 that the Building Official has determined that a building located on the above-described property was unsafe. You were advised in that notice of tl action that would be taken to remedy that unsafe condition and that the act would be initiated on an emergency basis by the City. x You failed to appeal the decision of the Building Official to Board of Construction Appeals although you were informed of y< right to an appeal and of the procedures for obtaining appeal. You have also failed to take the corrective action required b~ the notice of the Building Official. You appealed the decision of the Building Official to the Board of Construction Appeals. You were given written notification or that you were required to take the corrective actior required by the decision of the Board of Construction Appeals within a stated period of time. You failed to take the actiol required by the order of the Board' of Construction Appeals. You appealed the decision of the Building Official to the Boa] of Construction Appeals on . The Board of Construcl upheld the decision of the Building Official. The City of Delray Beach has therefore taken remedial action to remove the unsafe condition existing on the above-described property on 7-15-91 at a cost of $~u~ ~n which includes a ten percent (10%) administrativt fee. If you fail to pay this cost within thirty (30) days, that cost shal be recorded on the official Records of Palm Beach County, Florida against the above-described property. . . Copy of all notices referred to in this notice are available in the office of the Building Official. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION. City Clerk I ,~ , . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGERfX/ SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # <:gW - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 RESOLUTION NO. 61-91 DATE: August 7, 1991 This item is a Resolution assessing costs for abatement action required to remove nuisances on 35 properties located within the City. The Resolution sets forth the actual costs incurred and provides the mechanism to attach liens on these properties in the event the assessments remain unpaid. Recommend approval of Resolution No. 61-91 assessing costs for abating nuisances on 35 properties located within the City. . . - --- ~.- ----- ---- _____ __0-_----.-- RESOLUTION NO. 61-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 100 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS FOR ABATING NUISANCES UPON CERTAIN LAND(S) LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH AND PROVIDING THAT A NOTICE OF LIEN SHALL ACCOMPANY THE NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT; SETTING OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABATEMENT AND LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH ABATEMENT OF NUISANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND INTEREST ON ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE RECORDING OF THIS RESOLUTION, AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO BE A LIEN UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR UNPAID ASSESS- MENTS. WHEREAS, the City Manager or his designated representative has, pursuant to Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances, declared the exis- tence of a nuisance upon certain lots or parcels of land, described in the list attached hereto and made a part hereof, for violation of the provisions of Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 100.20, 100.21 and 100.22 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, the City Manager or his designated representative has inspected said land(s) and has determined that a nuisance existed in accordance with the standards set forth in Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances, and did furnish the respective owner(s) of the land(s) described in the attached list with written notice of public nuisance pursuant to Sections 100.20, 100.21 and 100.22 of the Code of Ordinances describing the nature of the nuisance(s) and sent notice that within ten (10) days from the date of said notice forty-two (42) days in the case of violation of Section 100.04 pertain- ing to seawalls) they must abate said nuisance, or file a written request for a hearing to review the decision that a nuisance existed within ten (lO) days from the date of said notice, failing which the City of Delray Beach would proceed to correct this condition by abating such nuisance, and that the cost thereof would be levied as an assess- ment against said property; and, WHEREAS, the property owner(s) named in the list attached hereto and made a part hereof did fail and neglect to abate the nuisance(s) existing upon their respective lands or to properly request a hearing pursuant to Section 100.21 and 100.22 within the time limits prescribed in said notice and Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances, or if the property owner (5) did request and receive a hearing, said prop- erty owner(s) failed and/or neglected to abate such nuisance(s) within the time designated at the hearing wherein a decision was rendered adverse to the property owner(s); and, WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach, through the City Administra- tion or such agents or contractors hired by the City Administration was there fore required to and did enter upon the land (5) described in the list attached and made a part hereof and incurred costs in abating the subject nuisance(s) existing thereon as described in the notice; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach has, pursuant to Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, submitted to the City Commission a report of the costs incurred in abating said nuisance(s) as aforesaid, said report indicating the i costs per parcel of land involved; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, pursuant to Chapter 100 of the Code of Ordinances desires to assess the I cost of said nuisance(s) against said property owner(s), . . . - ------- -~---~ - ------ - ~----- ------.-.-- - ------- ~--- - ------- ------- -- -------- --- ----~ -------------~-:-- -------=. -- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That assessments in the individual amounts as shown by the report of the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach, involving the City's cost of abating the aforesaid nuisances upon the lots or parcels of land described in said report, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby levied against the parcells) of land described in said report and in the amount(s) indicated thereon. Said assessments so levied shall, if not paid wi thin thirty (30) days after mailing of the notice described in Sec. 3, become a lien upon the respective lots and parce'l (s) of land described in said report, of the same nature and to the same extent as the lien for general city taxes and shall be collectible in the same manner as mortgages and fore- closures are under state law. Section 2. That such assessments shall be legal, valid and binding obligations upon the property against which said assessments are levied. Section 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach is hereby directed to immediately mail by first class mail to the owner (s) of the property, as such ownership appears upon the records of the County Tax Assessor, notice (s) that the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach on the has levied an assessment against said property for the cost of abatement of said nuisance by the City, and that said assessment is due and payable within thirty (30) days after the mailing date of said notice of assessment, after which a lien shall be placed on said property, and interest will accrue at the rate of 8% per annum, plus reasonable attorney's fees and other costs of collecting said sums. A Notice of Lien shall be mailed, along with the Notice of Assessment and this resolution. Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days from the date of adoption and the assessment(s) contained herein shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice of said assessment(s), after which a lien shall be placed on said property(s) , and interest shall accrue at the rate of eight ( 8) percent per annum plus, if collection proceedings are necessary, the costs of such proceedings including a reasonable attorney's fee. Section 5. That in the event that payment has not been received by the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the mailing da te 0 f the notice of assessment, the Ci ty Clerk is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this resolution in the public records of Palm Beach County, Florida, and upon the date and time of recording of the certified copy of this resolution a lien shall become effective on the subject property which shall secure the cost of abatement, interest at the rate of 8%, and collection costs including a reasonable attorney's fee. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the day of , 1991. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk I , - 2 - Res. No. 61-91 . COST OF ABATING NUISANCES UNDER CHAPTER 100 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OWNER ASSESSMENT E 200' OF LOT 13, ESQUIRE SUB. U.S. MARSHALL'S SERVICE $ 709.90 PB 23, P 43, PUBLIC RECORDS, C/O KEN DEAL 70.00 (ADM COST) PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL 301 N. MIAMI AVE, RM 205 (RECORDING) (1022 SW 9TH AVE.) MIAMI, FL 33128 LOT 1, BLK 1, DUMAR PLAZA CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO $ 332.75 REPLAT, PB 47,P 48,PB 44, C/O MERSHON ET AL 70.00 (ADM COST) P 188,PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM 200 S. BISCAYNE BLVD. (RECORDING) BEACH COUNTY, FL SUITE 4500 (AVE H) MIAMI, FL. 33131 LOTS 1 & 2, PARADISE HGHTS, CHARLENE G. PATRICK $ 50.00 PB 21, P 113, PUBLIC RECORDS, P.O. BOX 97841 70.00 (ADM COST) PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL RALEIGH, NC 27624 (RECORDING) (NW 6TH AVE & NW 3RD STREET) LOT 17, BLK 121, HIGHLAND PARK, RICHARD T. DOTY $ 24.00 DELRAY, PB 2, P 79, PUBLIC 309 NE 7TH AVENUE 70.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 (RECORDING) (309 NE 7TH AVENUE) LOTS 1 TO 9 INC., BLK 85, RESUB WILLIAM C. WILLIAMS III $ 142.00 OF BLK 85, DELRAY, PB 4, P 14, TR, 3112 VINCENT ROAD 70.00 (ADM COST) PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH WEST PALM BEACH, FL. 33405 (RECORDING) COUNTY, FL (29 SE 2ND AVENUE) LOT 3, ESQUIRE SUB., PB 23, U.S. MARSHALL'S SERVICE, $ 36.00 (ADM COST) P 43, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM C/O KEN DEAL 70.00 (RECORDING) BEACH COUNTY, FL. 301 N. MIAMI AVE, RM 20S (1012 GERMANTOWN ROAD) MIAMI, FL 33128 $ 36.00 WSO' OF SlS0' OF BLK 18,TOWN LONNIE & PHYLLIS DURHAM $ 80.00 OF DELRAY, PB 1, P 3, PUBLIC S21 NW 2ND STREET 70.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL DELRAY BEACH, FL. 33444 (RECORDING) (NW 6TH AVE & NW 2ND STREET) LOT IS/LESS E21S', ESQUIRE U.S. MARSHALL'S SERVICE $ 559.42 SUB., PB 23, P 43, PUBLIC C/O KEN DEAL 70.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL 301 N. MIAMI AVE, RM 205 (RECORDING) (1039 GERMANTOWN ROAD) MIAMI, FL. 33128 -3- RES. NO. 61-91 LOT 14/LESS E215', ESQUIRE SUB. U.S. MARSHALL'S SERVICE $ 431. 82 PB 23, P 43, PUBLIC RECORDS, C/O KEN DEAL 70.00 (ADM COST) PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL 301 N. MIAMI AVE, RM 205 (RECORDING) (1029-1031 GERMANTOWN ROAD) MIAMI, FL 33128 S60' OF E200' OF LOT 15, U.S. MARSHALL'S SERVICE $ 160.79 ESQUIRE;PB 23, P 43, PUBLIC C/O KEN DEAL 70.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL 301 N. MIAMI AVE., RM 205 (RECORDING) (1028 SW 9TH AVE) MIAMI, FL 33128 S31.25' OF E 200' OF LOT 14 & U.S.MARSHALL'S SERVICE $ 202.72 N31.25' OF E200' OF LOT 15, C/O KEN DEAL 70.00 (ADM COST) ESQUIRE, PB 23, P 43, PUBLIC 301 N. MIAMI AVE, RM 205 (RECORDING) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL MIAMI, FL 33128 (1026 SW 9TH AVENUE) N60' OF E200' OF LOT 14, U.S. MARSHALL'S SERVICE $ 460.00 ESQUIRE, PB 23, P 43, PUBLIC C/O KEN DEAL 70.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL 301 N. MIAMI AVE, RM 205 ( RECORDING) (1024 SW 9TH AVE) MIAMI, FL 33128 S80' OF ElSa' OF LOT 12, U.S. MARSHALL'S SERVICE $ 247.72 ESQUIRE, PB 23, P 43, PUBLIC C/O KEN DEAL 70.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL 301 N. MIAMI AVE, RM 205 (RECORDING) (1020 SW 9TH AVE) MIAMI, FL 33128 LOT 59, SUNSET PARK, DELRAY, MANUEL MOREDA $ 70.60 PB 12, P 65, PUBLIC RECORDS, MANUEL E. MOREDA 35.00 (ADM COST) PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL P.O, BOX 1953 (RECORDING) (MANGO DRIVE) DELRAY BEACH, FL 33447 LOTS 14 TO 16 INC., BLK 1, ESTERVINA MOREDA $ 76.60 SOUTHRIDGE, PB 13,P 38, PUBLIC P.O. BOX 1953 35.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL DELRAY BEACH, FL. 33447 (RECORDING) (REIGLE AVENUE) LOTS 17 TO 20 INC., BLK 1, ESTERVINA MOREDA $ 76.60 SOUTHRIDGE, PB 13, P 38, PUBLIC P.O. BOX 1953 35.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33447 (RECORDING) (REIGLE AVENUE) THE PT OF ELY77.41' OF NI00' COMMUNITY LAND CORP ET AL $ 64.00 OF S125' OF Wl/4 OF LOT 5 LYG BOX 50001 70.00 (ADM COST) ELY OF 1-95 R/W, SUB OF SEC LIGHTHOUSE PT, FL 33074 (RECORDING) 17-46-43, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL (SW 15TH AVENUE) LOT 3, WILLIAMS SUB., PB 24, WILLIE A. JENKINS $ 127.00 P 180, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM VERONICA HARTSFIELD 70.00 (ADM COST) BEACH COUNTY, FL 16343 SIMS ROAD (RECORDING) (232-234 SW 15TH AVENUE) DELRAY BEACH, FL 33484 -4- RES. NO. 61-91 <" . LOTS 23 TO 28 INC., BLK 5 TIITF/STATE OF FLORIDA $ 68.20 SOUTHRIDGE PB 13, P 38, PUBLIC FORMER MURPHY ACT LAND 70.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL 3900 COMMONWEALTH BLVD. (RECORDING) (SW 8TH AVE) TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399 LOTS 18 TO 20 INC., BLK 5, DORA M. TROUT $ 287.20 SOUTHRIDGE PB 13, P 38, PUBLIC C/O M. REESE 70.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL RR4 BOX 238 (RECORDING) (DOUGLAS AVENUE) PERRY, FL 32347 ALL OF PLAT, CORNICHE, PUBLIC CRAFT DEV. II, INC. $ 59.40 RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL 18559 LONG LAKE DRIVE 70.00 (ADM COST) (NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY) BOCA RATON, FL 33496 (RECORDING) LOT 19, BLK 10, ATLANTIC EVELYN CLINTON $ 50.00 GARDENS, DELRAY, PB 1, P 3, III NE 16TH AVENUE 70.00 (ADM COST) PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33435 (RECORDING) COUNTY, FL (SW 10TH AVENUE) LOT 3 2 , BLK A, .TOURIST NOOK, WILBUR COLEMAN $ 65.00 DELRAY, PB 11, P 47, PUBLIC 110 E. ATLANTIC AVENUE 70.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 (RECORDING) (NW 9TH AVE & NW 3RD ST) S150' OF E50' OF BLK18/LESS H. & HAZEL CLEM $ 50.00 E20'RD R/W, TOWN OF DELRAY, 3 SUMMER STREET 70.00 (ADM COST) PB 1, P 3, PUBLIC RECORDS, NORWALK, CT 06851 (RECORDING) PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL (NW 5TH AVE & NW 2ND STREET) Wl/2 OF LOT 7, BLK 30, TOWN ALBERT MARTIN $ 52.00 OF DELRAY, PB 1, P 3, PUBLIC MARILYN S. BARON 70.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL P.O. BOX 414002 (RECORDING) (SW 5TH AVENUE) MIAMI, FL. 33141 LOTS 56 TO 58 INC., SUNSET MANUEL MOREDA $ 70.60 PARK, DELRAY PB 12, P 65, MANUEL E. MOREDA 35.00 (ADM COST) PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM BEACH P.O. BOX 1953 (RECORDING) COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL. 33447 (MANGO DRIVE) LOT 12, BLK 96, LINN'S ADD TO THOMAS S. MCDERMAT $ 30.00 OSCEOLA PARK, DELRAY, PB 1, 347 SE 3RD AVENUE 70.00 (ADM COST) P 133, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM DELRAY BEACH, FL. 33483 (RECORDING) BEACH COUNTY, FL (347 SE 3RD AVENUE) / -5- RES. NO. 61-91 ," . . LOT 49, DELRAY MANOR ADDITION AMERICAS MORTGAGE SERVI- $ 43.00 TO DELRAY PB 12,P 59, PUBLIC CING INC. C/O JOSEPH M. 70.00 (ADM COST) RECORDS, PALM BEACH COUNTY,FL PANIELLO, P.O. BOX 2347 (RECORDING) (729 SW 9TH COURT) TAMPA, FL. 33601 LOT 4, BLK 23, TOWN OF DELRAY, MELVIN A. SMITH & OR THE $ 64.00 PB 10, P 69, PUBLIC RECORDS, ESTATE, HEIRS, DEVISEES, 70.00 (ADM COST) PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL LEGATEES OF MELVIN A SMITH (RECORDING) (SW 5TH AVENUE) 215 SW 5TH AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 LOTS 3 & 4, BLK 8, DELL PARK, RICHARD A. COURT $ 82.00 PB 8, P 56, PUBLIC RECORDS, 1012 NE 3RD AVENUE 70.00 (ADM COST) PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 (RECORDING) (1012 NE 3RD AVENUE) LOT 10, BLK 2, KENMONT, PB 20, WILLIAM H. CARTWRIGHT '$ 88.00 P 65, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM C/O COPELAND & KRAMER 70.00 (ADM COST) BEACH COUNTY, FL BOX 2421 (RECORDING) ( 71 0 BOND WAY) STUART, FL 34995 LOT 16, BLK 35, TOWN OF DELRAY, GRACE BARNETT $ 34.00 PB 1, P 3, PUBLIC RECORDS, 1401 39TH STREET 70.00 (ADM COST) PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL WEST PALM BEACH,FL 33407 (RECORDING) (NW 3RD AVENUE & NW 1ST ST) LOTS 19 & 20, BLK 5, SUB. OF RAY & DIANE MANGICAPRA $ 52.00 BLK 5, DELRAY BEACH, PB 23, 5300 W. ATLANTIC AVENUE 70.00 (ADM COST) P 72, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM DELRAY BEACH, FL 33484 (RECORDING) BEACH COUNTY, FL (43 & 47 SW 8TH AVENUE) LOTS 8 & 9/LESS RD R/W, BLK 2, DOLORES A. LIBBY TR. $ 220.00 SOPHIA FREY ADDITION, PB 4, C/O ARNOLD F. KURZINGER 70.00 (ADM COST) P 37, PUBLIC RECORDS, PALM 4426 GREENEAGLES DRIVE (RECORDING) BEACH COUNTY, FL BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436 (911 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY) LOT 2, BLK 85, TOWN OF DELRAY, WM. C. WILLIAMS, III TR. $ 64.00 PB 1, P 3, PUBLIC RECORDS, 3112 VINCENT ROAD 70.00 (ADM COST) PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33405 (RECORDING) (210 EAST ATLANTIC AVENUE) VIOLATION IS: SEC. 100.1 LAND TO BE KEPT FREE OF DEBRIS, BEGETATION, MATTER CONSTITUTING HAZARDS; DECLARED NUISANCE. -6- RES. NO. 61-91 '1 ,~ MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER !~1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~ 'X - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS DATE: August 7 , 1991 This item is before you to approve the award of the following bids and contracts: 1. Rehabilitation, Refurbishment and Overhaul 1978 1000 GPM Pumper- Fire Department- Southern Coach, Inc. , in the amount of $19,140 with funding from Repair and Upkeep Automotive (Account No. 001-2315-526-33.35) . Account balance $29,267. 2. Janitorial Services - City Hall, City Attorney's Office, Environmental Services Complex and Central Fire Station - Various vendors, in the amount indicated below, with funding from various departmental Janitorial Services (Account No. XXX-XXXX-XXX-33.17) : -City Hall - National Cleaning of Florida - $28,632. -City Attorney1s Office - National Cleaning of Florida - $4,260. -Environmental Services Complex - National Cleaning of Florida - $8,716. -Fire Station - Jani-King - $5,546. 3. Water Main Extension/Pine Ridge Road - Church of the Palms - Environmental Services - Metra Industries in the amount of $98,823 with funding from 1991 Revenue Bond Construction/Water Distribution Improvements (Account No. 447-5174-536-61.78). Account balance $284,468. 4 . Fleet Management Application Software- Fleet Management - HTE, Inc. in the amount of $35,000 (plus travel and training costs - $5,250) with funding from City Garage Capital Outlay (Account No. 501-3311-591-60.89) . Account balance $44,211.64. 5. Diesel and Unleaded Gasoline - Annual Contract - Various vendors, in the amount indicated below, with funding from various departmental Gas, Oil, and Lubricant account: -Unleaded gasoline (transport) - Coastal Fuels Marketing, Inc. - $148,000. -Unleaded gasoline (tankwagon) - B.P. Oil Company - $16,000. -Diesel Fuel - B.P. Oil Company - $6,000. 6. Hardscape, Sculpture and Landscape/Pineapple Grove - Community Improvement- ARZ Builders, Inc. in the amount of $94,153 with funding from Beautification Trust/Federal Highway - Linton to North End (Account No. 333-4141-572-61.27) . Account balance $140,410. 1.11 AGENDA REPORT Meeting of 8/13/91 7. Accounts Receivable Application Software- Finance Department - HTE, Inc. in the amount of $10,000, plus travel and training costs not to exceed $2,020 with funding from Finance/Application Software (Account No. 001-1811-513-60.86/Account balance $14,443), Finance/Travel Expenses (Account No. 001-1811-513-34.57/Account balance $1,000) and, Finance/Computer Training (Account No. 001-1511-513-33.57/Account balance $2,122. 8. Bulkhead Replacement/Seawall and Marginal Docks - Veteran's Park - B.K. Marine Construction in the amount of $220,630 with funding from Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Redevlopment Veteran's Park (Account No. 225-4126-572-61.63/Account balance $448,104) and General Construction Fund (334-4126-572-61.63/ Account balance $100,000). FIND Grant to reimburse 50% of project cost. 9. 4th Avenue Sidewalk Construction - Environmental Services - ~ive Star Construction Company in the amount of $94,396 with funding from Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Sidewalks S.W. 4th Avenue/Atlantic - Lin'ton (Account No. 225-3162-541-61.44). Account balance $103,369. 10. Computer Equipment - Env ironrnental Services - Microage in the amount of $13,319.25 for hardware and T.W. Communications in the amount of $492.40 for cables with funding from Computer Software/Hardware (Account No. 442-5178-536-64.09. Account balance $57,790.46. Recommend award of the above bids and contracts with funding as indicated. - 2 - . .-.--- ~ '. -----.. Agenda Item, No.: AGENDA REQUEST Date: 7/26/91 Request to be placed on: X Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: August 13, 1991 Descri~tion of item (who, what, where, how much): Award of bid for the re abilitation, refurbishment and overhaul of a 1978 1000 G ~umper to Sout ern Coach. Inc. of Ocala. Florida in the'amollnt. of 19,140.00. (Example: Request from Atlantic High School for $2,000 to fund project graduation). ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO Recommendation: Recommend approval of the bid from Sout~ern Coach Funding available in_#001-2315-52~~~j~ ' (Example: Recommend approval with funding from Special Events Account No. 001-3333-555-44.55). Department Head Signature: V~1 ~k.. , City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget Di~tor. ~eview (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): ;-+ftL<-O-u Fund ng available: YES/ NO Funding alternatives: (if applicable) Account No. & Descr,iption: f. 'i& / ~....; tljJJ~ t2h7P . Account Balance: #~1JJ/''1. 7 ~ I City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: {9/ NO !;V/ Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: ~ Received: Placed on Agenda: Action: Approved/Disapproved . MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden, City Manager THROUGH: Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager/ ~ Administrative Services FROM: Ted Glas, Purchasing /j// DATE: July 29, 1991 SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 13, 1991 - BID AWARD - BID #91-63 REFURBISHMENT OF 1978 PUMPER Item Before City Commission: The City Commission is requested to award contract to low bidder, Southern Coach, Inc. at a cost of $19,150. Per the Budget Office, funding is from: ( ) . Background: Funds were allocated in the 90-91 Fire Department Operating Budget for the rehabilitation of this fire truck. A total of $ was budgeted for this work. Bids were received on July 15, 1991 from two (2) vendors, all in accordance with City purchasing procedures. (Bid 1191-63. Documentation on file in the Purchasing Office. ) A tabulation of bids is attached for your review. The Fire Chief has reviewed the bid, and recommends award to the low bidder, Southern Coach, Inc. per attached memo. Recommendation: Staff recommends award to low bidder, Southern Coach, Inc. at a total cost of $19,150. Funding as outlined above. Attachments: Tabulation of Bids Recommendation from Fire Chief pc Chief Koen 'I-II - [ITY DF DElHAY BEA[H FIRE DEPARTMENT M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: TED GLAS, PURCHASING OFFICER FROM: KERRY B. KOEN, FIRE CHIEF DATE: JULY 26, 1991 SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID - REFURBISHMENT OF 1978 PUMPER We have reviewed the bids submitted for the refurbishment of a 1978, 1000 G.P.M. pumper and recommend that the award be made to Southern Coach, Inc. of Ocala, Florida in the amount of $19,150.00. This amount includes the base bid and options 1, 3 , 4, 5 , 6 and 7. The Southern Coach Inc. bid is the low bid and it meets our specifications. We recommend that this item be scheduled for City Commission action at the regular meeting on August 13, 1991. This project is funded by the current Fire Department Operating Budget with funds in line item number 001-2315-526-33-35. '/~~,1L.- .. Kerry B. Koen Fire Chief KBK/mmh Attachment: 2 cc: David T. Harden, City Manager F !h[ D[pf\in!Mld j-1['M)OU/\HTrHS. 101 VJESl /\TLAN:iC /\'/ENUE. DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 407<:)437400. FAX ,10-' )G~)AI1(;O . o ;0 '::' ::0 f11 ~ O! Xl li) 0 I ;0::0 0 OJ::O 0 1> 0 0 0 3 0 I ~..J.. 0 -i I < (-l o f"Ilf"ll f"Il3.....-o f"IlC'J (11fT1\J OfT1\J Zf"Il\J <D"") DH'J 0 I f11 C 3 Or OOf11~-i rO-i ~3-i O"'O-i DO-i f"Il~-i OO-i -i Z r 3 fT1H C::O H H-iH rOH OOrH ~H ::OOH OIH D 0 ~ f11 H< OO~OI f11HO <0 -iDO < 0 I::OO ~OOO r 0 Z \JfT1 f11f11~Z ~OZ ~f11Z f110Z 1>0Z 1> Z HZ ::0 ..... -i -i::O zm z D ::Of11 rC C~ 0 r ~ ~ cn~# < # om# 3# <Z# rH# f11n C Z . O-i Z~ ~ DO~ OO~ -if11~ f11 W ::ON ..... 3 D ........ ~H H "T!' rHo ~O. DZ' ::0' .......f11. 1>'"1J 3 ~ 3 -iOO <0 0 Z-i .......H D 0 f11 ~ fT! OfT! Z::O-i f"Ilr:1 -i ~ DO 0-0 0 (i).. '>0 x::o .......f"IlO::O f11 ~ Om OC H' C ..... o OD 0 D ~ JJ ~O 0::0 ~3 -i 13 f"Il f11~ f11ffi"T!O D DO ~ -0 H .' "1J ::O-i OQIf11 0 0 0 -i f11 CCN 0 00 Z H )J OD~H - ~D o -iOOZ r Z '-' (f) -,-,-- -~----- '- ..... rt 00 III :I:.....S * v..> ..... ..... z ___ _ _ _ _ (/l Nlllrt.....lll 0* 0 '- 0 V1P~...............P. n ...... C O;O;"~ ~'-~z 0.. ~~VJ.... N N rt .......t"t N......O tu V'l N ... .. .. "'.. ::r Ort:Tv..> .... '< 0 V1 00\J1 \D \J1 \J1 0 l1> o 0 ~ l1> :~ rr~ 00 0 0 g g:iS :is g g g a H\"'tj ::I N r1' .-...... 0 0 . . . '1Clll III < ::E: 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 n OS..........PlllC;:T 000 0 0 0 0 0 JJ S'1jO'-;o;"CIlP~ III f11 .....N I-'-::l '-'-'- * n I M:To.. M:(M (/l'tl"1 * :T D ~~CIl~O~~~ ~ OJ (J) lllCll'1j::r~ H III P n C '1 r o....o..::rS::l'1~ H "g~'1j~'1j~~g' -i ,... III I-'-OQ I-'- ..... I-'- ..... D o 0..'1j III 00 > III ..... '>0 -i ::l"<~'CIl>1~~o.. ~H n 'O::rCllllll1>O III coo -iH '1111 '1'1j::llll Z 1>-i ,... ~ III lll.... ....."0 ...... OJ ~ n ::l'1 III 00 H..... C <l> lll>1n( c: O;:OlJJrO >1 ~~I'"-rtl3 OrnH1>-n l1>'1::r0..::l::r::r O"T!O-i ' ~~ ~ ( OQ ~ ~ C H 0 III H....,... 0 I'"-OQ (i) ;:0 # 0 f11 nlllMrtCP C(J Zr ~ ~. :r rt ::::~ "'0 H ~ ;1J - 0.. >....::l 00 0~~OD . >;0;""< l1> rt :3 I I ~ ~ 0.. ....'1'0 ~ 30' III .... 0 <l> ..... El f11 (~ C(J IJJ g-::;:rt::l' :0 I 1)Z Hf11 n :rill lll::l I C-i OD rtM<l>::l""P 3- (>'0 :r o..::ro..rt 1) I III lll::r f11 D I'"- ::0 Z 00 0 o ()t1m~~~~~tr1 \0 -4It ~ -M- ~ ..,. -(I') ""'" ~ C/.l < ~ ~.g v..> M 5.. N ..... ~ 0 N g f11 .....'0 1:( I I trl 0.. ~ ..... \J1 0'> 0 rt J)I~ <l>H <l>:( 'tl III \J1 ex> w.. .::r ...."< .& ;; ::::.& b'::1 ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :is g; "1 ~ ~ III ~ "< ....~ >1 @ 0 0 0 :- :- ~ 0 V1 6' r .... (/l 0 ......00 0 l1> 0 0 0 0 0 V1 0 ex> '1 <: ::l ::l N C ::l n r-< 0 0 O' 0 0'> I'"- <l> III 0"0 0 H P. "CI~""-""'tj=::;:<Ul ~ (rtO'> H~<l>H 1'"-1'"- '<'< >1" ~ rtrt(/l<l> ::E: ~ :r <l> C III III ~ 00 ,.." n>1 ~ C lll~"" 'Ortlll >1 (/ll'"-(Olllrt ::r (/l'tl0 III H;o;" 01 ::l :xl::l '1 "< III . n Ill<=: >1'0 ~ 'OV1(/lIll'1~::l ::l MOI-'-::l 0 >< 0 .... l-'-~o..rt"Onrt III M""<l>"<'<lll >1 III >< H'O 0 . O'>:xl___~rt::l "10111Cll::l1-'- ~ (/lZH (II (II 0 ::r ::l Ol (/l I'"- (II ::l I'"- n ""~ ::r 0.. . V1 H\1ll0rt :"0 rtOOOl I'"- <=: .... 00 c: (/lCllllllllrtlll::r n n...... (') ('t) ...... 00< :T>10 (II >1 ::l III III rt M N 0.. rt (II '""" ""-"PJttl.-., Ol::l P H_ .....M::E: ;0;" v..> ..... III III rt V1 ::l:>;" (Ill 0 I 0.. <l> ~ I-'- P . I-'- !"t;o;" 0 ::: :r-.8 I . Agenda I tern No.: AGENDA REQUEST Date: July 30, 1991 Request to be placed on:' x Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: Au~ust 13. 1991 Description of agenda item (who I what I where I how much): Bid Award - Janitorial Services - Annual Contract - for City Hall, City Attorney's Office, Environmental Services Complex. Central Fire Station ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO Recommendation: Multiple awards as outlined on recommendation memo ~ / ~ }f-~ fJt ~ / Department Head Signature: Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget Director R~view (required on all iteas involving expenditure of fundS)t.,' ,j;~ Fun 'ng available: YES/ NO Fun ng alternatives: (if applicable) Account No. & Description: Account Balance: City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: ~/ NO tl~ Hold Until: r I Agenda Coordinator Review, ~ Received: ~ ~ ~I , Action: Approved/Disapproved MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden, City Manager THROUGH: Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager/ ~ Administrative Services FROM: Ted Glas, Purchasing Officer ~~ DATE: July 30, 1991 SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 13, 1991 - BID AWARD - BID #91-57 JANITORIAL SERVICES - ANNUAL CONTRACT Item Before City Commission: The City Commission is requested to make multiple awards for janitorial services at four locations as listed below, at a combined ~ost o~ $47,154. Per the Btdget ?ffice, funding is from:/l~~~ 1M' f.L/}f..uf jW,W. ( t 9';;""_dv'lI/Il, ). Background: Funds were allocated in the FY 90-91 Budget for this service. Areas of Service: City Hall City Attorney's Office Environmental Services Complex Central Fire Station All other buildings are cleaned by City employees. Bids for this contract were received on June 19, 1991 from fourteen (14) contractors, all in accordance with City purchasing procedures. (Bid #91-57. Documentation on file in the Purchasing Office.) A tabulation of bids is attached for your review. Per attached memo from Bid Specialist, only four firms were responsive to City Specifications. Low Responsive Bidders are, as follows: Annual Location Contractor Cost .il -:: I City Hall National Cleaning of Florida $28,632. 1-10! J) 4 7> n City Attorney National Cleaning of Florida 4,260. ,:; L? 1/ ~t),. ?'/7;~nviron. Services National Cleaning of Florida 8,716. 1'/ '11'-,,1 ire Station Jani-King* 5,546. '7 I (* Note attached memo from Fire Department) Pag.e 2 Memo Bid 1191-57 Recommendation: Staff recommends award to the low responsive bidders as stated above. Attachments: Tabulation of Bids Memo from Bid Specialist Memo from Fire Department pc Jeff Kurtz John Elliott Chief Koen William Greenwood Ernie Derango , M E MaR AND U M TO: Bob Barcinski, Asst. City Manager Administrative Services John Elliott, Asst. City Manager Support Services THRU: Ted Glas, Purchasing Officer~; FROM: Jackie Rooney, Bid Specialist \:f- DATE: July 18, 1991 SUBJECT: Janitorial Services - Annual Contract Bid #91-57 Purchasing has evaluated the bids on the Janitorial Services Contract. Fourteen (14) bids were received in the Purchasing Office on Tuesday, June 18, 1991. Out of the fourteen (14) bids received only four (4) bids were responsive in supplying the Task Manning Plan and References required in the bid specifications. Of the four (4) responsive bids, National Cleaning of Florida was low bidder on the City Hall, Environmental Services Complex, and City Attorney's Office. National Cleaning submitted several references. I have checked five of these references and find them quite good. (See attached Reference Sheet for comments received.) A meeting was held on July 18, 1991, at 11:00 a.m. in the Purchasing Office with Mr. Richard Cosby of National Cleaning of Florida, Ernie Derango of Facility Maintenance, Mark Kilbourne of Environmental Services Public Work, and myself. The meeting was called to go over the Scope Of Work with Mr. Cosby. The conclusion of the meeting was that Mr. Cosby was in complete understanding of the scope of work and will perform services as specified. Mr. Cosby is also available to meet with you if you have such requirements. Purchasing 1S ready to recommend National Cleaning of Florida for the Jantiorial Service and prepare an agenda request accordingly. Would you please reVl.ew and give your comments and/or approval. Annual cost for each location listed below: City Hall - $28,632.00 Environmental Services - $ 8,716.00 City Attorney's Office - $ 4,260.00 Recommendations for Fire Station will follow from Chief Wigderson. Attachments: Tab Sheet cc Jeff Ku r tz , City Attorney Ernie Derango, Superintendent Facility Maintenance Mark Kilbourne, Superintendent Environmental Services Public Works " References: July 17, 1991 National Cleaning of Florida In business for over 100 years. Have several office locations in Florida. L Richard Ramsden (305) 359-0270 C. LT. Ft. Lauderdale International Airport (Banking corporation financing aircrafts) Approximate square footage - 6,000 a) "Outstanding Job" b) "I work late often and when working late notice that the management people of National Cleaning checks often on their laborers to make sure they are doing their job" c) "Nice People " d) "Been cleaning for us about one year" 2. Ken Eppert (407) 833-7337 Phillips Point, West Palm Beach Approximate square footage - 250,000 a) "Very good Company " b) "Very responsive " c) "A company is as good as its employees. Employees outstanding. " 3. Keith Parks (407) 364-2142 Motorola Company, Boynton Beach Approximate square footage - 350,000 a) "Have management to run job" b) "Do a good job" c) "Like a lot of jobs, we have had a few problems, but these were straightened out, and they are still with us. " d) "Good job overall" 4. Evelyn Quinn (305) 359-3200 Jet Center (Aviation Offices) Ft. Lauderdale Airport Approximate square footage - 194,000 a) "Been very pleased in general" b) "Very Responsive " c) "Employee turnover has been very small" d) "No security problems, do a good job" 5. John Grubs (407) 694-3816 Florida Power and Light, Juno Beach Approximate square footage - 500,000 a) "Very good Job" b) "Have had them for five years " c) "Problems are taken care of quickly with only one phone call" d) "Do a couple of other satelite offices for us also, about 30 to 50,000 sq ft. " '" [ITY DF DELRAY BEA[H FIRE OEPARTMENT M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: JACKIE ROONEY, BID SPECIALIST FROM: M. B. WIGDERSON, ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF DATE: JULY 16, 1991 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO BID #91-57 I have reviewed the bids submitted for the janitorial service to the Fire Department buildings. I interviewed three of the respondees, Patricia Hopkinson - Jani-King, Seacrest Services Inc. and Custom Care Building Services. Allstate Specialty Services had made an appointment but failed to attend. I was impressed by Custom Care Building Services but I understand that they are not viable in the bid process. I found Jani-King very competent in the work scheduling and scope of duties. I spoke to three of the references given by this company and all were favorable in their comments concerning the work performed by the company. The time period of their services had ranged from 6 months to 3 years. I am satisfied to recommend that the bid for janitorial services for the Fire Department be awarded to Patricia Hopkinson, D.B.A. as Jani-King. 17j{J 1 . -' i()U;k~A 4 JJf- M. B. Wigderson . Assistant Fire Chief MBW/mmh Flki 1,)[f'(\kl[vlF r HU,\()CllJl\Fnu..(~). 101 ',\E~)1 /\TLA"~llC: i\\:TI\JUf. DFU1!'Y f3t:f>.CH FLORIDA 33444 41)7)<11 ~400. ri\J<10i )'1~,1hhr) " ~I D D"T'l ~I D rn CD D n r I '"' Z,H Z ,H 0 C D"T'l-l Z';o rn-l "U n r11 < "T'l-< -l ('"\ Z ZHO "U ("', r1 n('"\ rnfTl ZO nn H 00 "Unr1 ('"\n -< D r1 Z;O-< n,x ro X <..... fT1rx rO ;0 ;o-l fT1rx ro -< fTlf'T1D ;lJfT1...; I"'llfJ lfJ HD ;ofTl...; fTl try 0 D ;ofT1-1 fTllfJ ':r H .... X r Drn D...; -1-1 ;or Dr'" D-I Z nr DfTl D-I D 0 .;) lfJ -<Z;o Z ;oD 0 -<Z;o Z 3: H -<Z;O Z 'r Z . -1-1-< fTlH..... H'" D-I Z-< m H..... H" rn -1-< mH H H" r oo ;lJ D fTl, DZO ZO H ..... 3:fTl DZO ZO Z -<fTl DZO ZO .... D-ID ;0(;);0 C);O rO fTlD ;oC';U (;);0 -I D ;U(;);o (;);0 .;) .....HJ:' ~ fTlZ Z;o ~ D :r;o '-" .0 ,or -'~ "UH ;0 -Ir -~ 1)H r Dr ,.....~ "UH .... fTlZ-< -I ..... fTlZ lfJ# D-< -1 H fT1Z r-< -1 H fT1Z ;0 ~Z ;0 try ..... r ~Z ;u t,' lfJ r ~Z ;olfJ #n H':) .... n He' H fTl n He' .... ....0 GO 3:e' D try 0 00 3:0 ';0 0 no 3:0 try fT1~ OfTl Z <lfJ fTl~ OfTl < ti) fT1~ OfT1 D-' Z 0 0-1 Z .... ..... Z Z -I lfJ -I n -l 0" ::r .." :r fTl :r C 0 try J:' J:' .,. ~ ~ ..... ~ N HtI> ..... ..., ..... N ...,..., :l tII N N ..., . . 00 n 00 ~ Co ..., ..... . ~ '" ..., n ~N 00 ..,,~ ..., 0 ON ... a- a- 00 ..., 0 N '" 0 00 0.." tII 0 0 00 N 00 . . .' III . 0 00 0 00 ~ 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 tI> ...... ...... < ...... n 00 nz: ~ .- ~ 0-00 '"' ..., ..., 011 N N It ... D . :... 00 011 ""N Do ~ .." ~N . ~ :l 0 Z ..., ~ '" ..... ..... '" ..., '" 011 00..., ~:l H N 0 N'" '" ~ ...,N ..., 0 N..... :l III -I 0 a- ..., N ~ 011 '" CIllO- 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 ;0 0 00 0 0 00 HI D ...... r n ...... ...... .., -IH 0- lfJ D-I !l' ft1 CD-< ;0 C .... =n <CDro ~ ~ c C HHD" ..... N N ~1Il nO-l ..... ..... - N.... '" '" N .... ... fT1 ""0 . . N Co . ~ ""0 lfJ#Orn '" ..... ..... ..... ~ ~o Ol O~ ~B Zr .." '" ..,,~ ..., ~..., ID .." ~N :l N ~ ...,'" ..... 0 ~..., .." 0 ..,,0 OlIn I >D ;0 ~ . . III .....OD N '" "'~ 0 a-o a- 0 a-~ tI>... D I ,,-< ~ 0 ~..., a- 0 0"" ~ 0 ~..., < tII ZU1 0 n Z-JCDCD ...... ...... ...... II . C Hft1 D OD r ti) n ~tI> ... .... .... ..... ~ ..., :l C n ..., ..., ..... N..... ..., .....N 00 :l 0 . N N III Z ID ID ..., 00 . .." Ol "', m:r -I .." .." ON 0 ..., 00 ..., ID 0"" '<.. ;0 0 0 0"" ..., 0 00 '" 0 00 III :l 0 0 0 . ... tII D 0 00 . 0 00 0 00 tII (") 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 S n ... 0 0 Ql .... ...... ...... ...... tII Hili :l :l n l ..m ~ .... ..- :l ... ..., ..... ..... ..., ..., DO 0 . N ..., ...,- ~ ...,N :l ..... . . :... :etll ..., - IDN ..., - .." ..... CD IDeo III ... ..... ID ...,~ ..... ~ ..., ..., '" 0 '" .... :l . ..", "'~ .." "" 00 ~ ~ 00 ,,"Ill .." 0 . . 0 III N .." ..., Ol 0 OOID 0 00 . :e 0 N..... 0 0 00 0 0 00 lD. H ... ...... ...... ...... :l." ? I m ~ ~ ~e: N .... ..... ..., ..., ..... N..... .... N .."N n ... 0 ..... ..., . '0 ~1Il ..... .." ""0 N N '" III ... 0 ..... Ol_ 0 0 O~ 0 0 0..., Hili .." "'.." 0 0 ..., ..... ..., 0 ..., .... ...... 0 0 0.." ..., '< tII 0 0 0 ,OlD ~ 0 ~ '" 00 0 0 ~N ~ 0 ~N '" 0 00 ~ < ...... ...... n ...... '!' .., III 00 ~ mo tII .... .... ..... ~ ~ tt 00 ..... ..., ..... ~..... ~ N N"" ~~ . ..., ~ . C- o ~ ..... ~ ..... 0..... Ol ..... .." ..Ill - 0\1\ ..... .... ~..., 0 00 N- n 0 ID NOlI ..., 0 00 0 0 00 tt i:= 0 0\.1' 0 '. 0 . . 0 00 0 0 00 .... 0 0 :58 0 0 00 0 0 00 :l 0 0 ... ...... ...... I tt :l 00 :l n "' . I ~I 1> . 1> ..., CC' 1> r"'I CC' 1> (') r '-' Z...... Z ...... 0 C 1>""1-1 Z;o rn...... <: ...,...... -I n Z Z......o "'Q(')r"'I ()n 1"'1r"'1 ZO "1Jnr"'l ()(") ...... 00 "1JnfTl nn -< 1> r"'I Z;O...... rnrx ro X <-< rnrx rO ;0 ;0...... f'1rx ro ...... r"'I1"'11> ;orn...... rno (~ ......1> ;or"'l-< r"'I Ul 0 1> :D(Tl...... (Tl (.1 I ...... 0- X r 1>'" 1>-1 ~ ...... ;Or 1>r"'I 1>''':; Z lor 1>m 1>...... 1> 0 .0 G1 -<Z:D Z ;01> 0 -<ZX' Z 3 ...... -<Z;O Z r Z ............00( ",...... ...... ........., 1>-< Z-< m...... ...... ........., ", ......-< r"'I........... ........., r .. ;l:l1>r"'I 1>ZO ZO ...... ...... 31"'1 1>ZO ZO Z -<r"'I 1>ZO ZO 0- 1>-<1> ;0(;);0 (;);0 ro r"'I1> :0;;):0 "';0 -< -1> :0"':0 "':0 ,,0 ............::0 - rnz z;o - 1> I;l:l '-" -.) ror ,....~ "...... ;0 -Ir -~ 1J...... r 1>r -~ "'0...... 0- 'm Z -< -I...... (T'IZ (fJ'# 1>-< -I...... (TlZ r-< -I...... r"'IZ ::0 ~Z ;0 (,1 0- r ~Z ::00 (~ r ~Z ::00 #(; H...... ...... n ......0 ...... m n ......':' ...... ....0 no 30 1> UlO no 30 ::0 0 no 30 (.1 n~ 0'" Z < (0 ",~ orn <: l0 m~ 0(Tl 1>...... Z 0 n...... Z ...... ...... Z Z -I (.1 -I () -I 0""1 I .,., I r"'I I 0 0 (~ ;0 ;l:l ." .... .... .... ...... ...... ~ ~ c... N N .... ....- v- v- .... III ::c . 0- :l 0 N N_ " 0\- v- - " ~'" \Q v- ~oo .... v- OO~ " v- NO\ I"," ~ 0 ~" 0 ? 00 ? 0 ??- :o::~ ~:l 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 .:l III 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 OOQ. ...... ...... ......' ...... C7' ;;;- o :0:: ~ .... .... '1 III c... .... .... '" '" ~:l 0\ 0\ - _N 0\ - V-.... III ..... 1> 0- ~ . ....D1 Z .... .... v- N N 0\ 00 N 0\00 :l ...... 00 0 00.... 0 0 00 0 0 00 ~Q. -I '" 0 "'N ~ '" 00 0 0 00 0 't'" c... 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 DI III ::0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 ~~ 1> r ,-, ...... ...... ...... ... ...... .... enl < t~ 1>-1 rn CC'-< ::0 C o X <roro .... .... '1 n ......~D"'Tl .... - - '" 6- :;~ ()O-l .... .... - - " N V-.... 0- I 0- Co ~ . . ....n (Tl ....0 0 0\ .... - '" \Q ",,, :r ('0#Or1 0 I 00 - - \QV- \Q - 00\Q en zr 0 00 N " v- " N N 00 III c... I .0 ::0 0 00 ~ 0 ~ \Q 0 0 gg ~ ~ ...-01::- 0 00 0 0 Ov- 0 0 ~.... 1> I ...,-< n ... Z Ln ...... ...... ...... III I Z~TGJ C ......1"'1 1> 01> nCl r l1 (') ......... .... III :l n '" '" III 0 :z: :z: 00 - " .... :l ~ 0 0 Co 0- . - .... Z - \Q :l Cl ...... 01 01 .... .... 0\ .... 00.... ::0 ~ ~ v- .... 00 III 1> Q. Q. en:l n 0 0 00 < -j 0 0 00 n . ...... .... .... .- .... ~n .... .- v- _ v- v- ~~ N .... v- v- - ....~ :l - . - 0\ .... . Co . . ...en 0\ '" -N " 0\ 00 - N~ III ~ ~ N(1\ (1\ 0 00 0 N 00'" ::SOl 00 0 . . 0 0 00 DI C 0 0 0 00 ::s ~ 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0, 00 n .... 00 0 0 0 00 III Q. ...... .... ...... ...... n::s 000 .::: .... .... ....~ 00 00 - - :l .... 0- 00 " - 00 N '" " . . . :z: 01 0 0 00 - N \Q '" 0 ~'1 0 0 00 .... N .... \Q .... '" 0 ~'" 01 ~c; 0 0 00 . . . .... 0 0 00 0 0 0.... Q. ~... 0 0 00 :l " ...... ...n ...... .... en III < III '"" n ::s III 00 .... .... :.~ III " .... .... .... " . " '" ~ ON 00 '" 000\ :l~ N " '0 N '0 ....Q. 0 v- N (1\ 0 OV- '0 Ov- ... 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 00 o en 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 '1 III 0 0 :;~ I 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 00 I 0 00 0 0 00 I 0 0 i 00 I ..... .... 0 ...... n I ...... ...... III I ! i I I I i - , . . ~ 0 "Tl l'Tl "TlZ ~ 01 "lJ lD D ("' r -< 0 ..... ..... Z OC .....C;o 'H 0 D :I -< ;0 < ;o:I "TlZ..... -< ("' lD :I -< l'Tl ..... CO 00 "Tl -< "lJOl'Tl 00 -< D C l'Tl ;0 Ol'Tl ;oDI"1 00 I"1rx ro -< r Z D (,1 0 .....;0 l'Tl-< ;0-< ;ol'Tl-< l'Tl(/) D ...... D -< -< -< Z -< 0 "Tl D Dl'Tl D-< ,-< 0 -< (,1 -< ' D :I -<0 C t,) 0 Or -<Z;o Z .-< Z ..... 0 -< l'Tl ..., l'Tll'Tl;o ..... l'Tl..... ..... ......" 0 .. 0 "- ;0 ..... Z :I: tl) ;0 ....-< DZO ZO ;0 Z Z 0 -< Dl'Tl -<<(/) -<l'Tl ;0";0 ";0 Z l'Tl l'Tl Z D r:I l'Tl.....D D '-' '1"1 0 X -< r r"lJ 00-< D;o -~ "lJ..... ,-< ." (') . u r '-"fTlC ....r -< ..... ' l'TlZ . fTl Ul ... t1 '0 ;0 ....-< ~Z ;O(/) tl) lD "lJ fTl -< 0 0 .....0 ..... H -< 0 i?'> ;0 l'Tl D ;0(") (")0 :IO 0 C' ..... ." < f'T1 -< zO l'Tl~ 0l'Tl ""'1 tl) 0 "Tl -< ..... tl) l'Tl (,1) Z ""'1 Z ..... ;0 (") i?'> -<-< -< ..... (""\ tl) (") D I'T1 . :I: (") 0 .. l'Tl ..... t1 (/) 1"1 Z r -< I l'Tl' < v~"''''! "'''''''l"l'''(")0Il"l~> ;;;J .... .....CI> (").......0I~.....::r1t I-" ....Ill ........::l......nOl n (,1 '0- ::l III I-"O::l" CI-"::lDo"IllOl 0... 0< O"::r" Do,.. III N . . n III ~ . ~ t ; ~. go . :; C,.. 0 III 0 ~ 0'< ~.... ~ g ... . . . n 'C:!~I!~'" DoCjf'OCI>'O 'O::ec:lDot: - - N .., N .., .., .., ... 'O~ \D '" . 0- III ........ .. . t::;C 1I:;1I~1Ie.:;:;li:; It . 0 .N 01 ...- " ~ ::: Do g::: g. ~. a ~;: ~ :! ~ ...... Do_~ 01'0 0 0 00 o It 0 0 00 CI> O'~ "~ I!. ::rg.~ ~g\D~\D1 ~-~ ::I ... < - n '<" "',.,. I .. uC'D.. P1 ::r 01 ~ ~" .., ..,01.., ,,.. ~ ::I ::I ~ 0 0 0 "'''''''l"l'''(")OItol>> i '0-.1 (") t:"''''! ........ ='......n CD Q.n IN It . .. .....z ........Ill O"'O<O"::r"Do'" "'VI . III III " III 01 o III 0... 0'< It .. III ::I N N . 0 . Dl " ::r::l,.. 'OCI>'O''O::e~l&.~ '0 . N.., ::l .... , Ill_ N N .... '" ....0 ~~if II "IICI>II Ill....."c::- ...'0 0- . 0- .., ::l ::I Dl III ..... III III II III 01 III 0 00 III DoO'::l 2 :: ~ :l 0 t-' .. Co..:- I o ... 0 00 ..... . e.a I ::I 0 0 00 0 0 .... I t: -Ill :T 0 .... "::I ....,:J......nloD o Q. .... - "00 .. III .. ... I . .., III 0 0010 ,.. ..... Q. 0 0 0 i I III O'."''''! ~:=:~g'~~l!::~i!," I ........ ..... '0- =(") Q."Ill. O"'O<O":T"Q.,.. III 0 ....' c:: c:: "II'" o III 0... 0'< It .... III ::l ... . . ....01 III '0 CI>'O . '0 ::e ~ e &. ~ - - - .... VI . ..... " Do 6. if '00 0.., Q.O II "IItI>BDl....."c:..... III 0 ~ -.... ....11 t: "::I III III ..... III III II III ...- 00 0 \D . ::l .... ::I """""',.,........0. 0.. 01'0 \D . . 00(") "01.... o .... 0 < 0 _00 o III 0 ..... \D III :TC:::l 0 .... I t: -Ill ::l ... ~ 0 0-00 CI>... 0'00 \O::soon~ o Q. 0- < III I "Ill 0 ... :T - n 0 001.. ,.. ... 01 0 0 0 . 0 ~~ t:"''''! ~:=:~g'~~l!::~r; I i '000 .... .....Ill III . .... 01 ::l " III 01 0... 0< O":T"Q.,.. I ... 0 . . " 01 :T::l,.. o III 0... 0'< III .... III ::l i.... 0 ~ III ::r 'OCI>'O''O::e~e&.~ - - 1- '0 VI .... II .... ~~if Ill_ 00 N 0-00 01 ::l Iil"BtnBIll...."c:.... I ...'0 0 0 00 III Do 0'::1 III III .... III III II III 01 III ..... e.a ~;:~:!~.......Q.-~ I o ... 0 0 00 ::l (") ::l 0 0 00 n ..... " ::l 0 .... 1 t: - III I :T III "<10 O"o:s......n...... o Q. I ... - III III .. 0"0 ... . ::l Do .... .. 01 .. ,.. .... 0 - 0 .a VI 0 ."''''! ~:=:~g'~~l!::~r; '0- ....tn .... .....Ill Ill~ ::l " "Ill 01 0... 0< O":T"Q.,.. ... . - lIll 0 "::I"" 0.. 0... 0'< It .... III ::l 0 N N ::I . '0 tn'O . '0 ::e ~ ~ &. ~ N .. . . '00 . . ::elll Dog, Ill_ '" 00 N III ... B".tnBIll...."c:..... ...'0 0 . VI .... ::I ~"g III III .... III .. II III . III ... ..... 0- Oll Q.OI ~;:~:!~......Q.-~ o ... . "... ::I - 0 -0 . ::e ::rC:::I 0 .... I t: _ III ::r N 0 N_ III O'lIll O-::lo-n\D o Q. ... ... ..... 0'1 .. t'D .. ... . - ::l'O .... 0 .010 ,.. n I Q. 0 VI 0 t:"''''! ~:=:~g'~~l!::~r; '000 tn> .... .....Ill III . .... '0.... "Ill 01 0... 0< O"::r"Do'" "'VI VI VI III ..... ::r::l,.. o It 0... 0'< '.. .... III ::l 0 ~ n 01 '0 tn'O . '0 ::e ~ e &. ~ - - - .... '0 .... O. .... " ~~if Ill_ .... 0 ....- III III II "IItnBIll...."c:..... ...'0 .... 0 .... \D ..... " Q.0'::l -Ill .. .....Illllllllll 01 III ~ . " III . II ::l ~:.~:!2......a..:- o ... 0 .. '< ........ ::l 0 0 0'" " ::l 0 .... I t: _Ill . :T tn "00 ........::s\Dn\D o . Q. ... - < ." III .. III .. ... . n III Q. 0 0010 ,.. Dl 00 0 0 0 III :::.;:::;' ~ :=: ~ g' ~ ~.n; :.~ ;; 'O\D tl>O '-' III . III III ~a :. g...o<O"::r,.,Q.,.. ...0 - :! ~ III 0... 0'< III .... III ::l 0 . . III 'Otn'O''O::e~e&.~ - - - .., '0 . ....01 Dog if Ill_ ~, \D 0- .... n II " II tn II III ....,., c:: ..... ...'0 ~ 0 0ll\D III if t: ,., ::l III III ..... III III B III 01 III 0 00 ... ::I 2::2:l2.-..C....:- o ... 0 .... "01'" ::l 0 0 00 ::l I ::rC:::l 0 .... I II: - III ::r ,0 00 " O'CIll CXI:J.....n..... o . Q. ... III 0'1 _Ill_ ... I - ::l ... 0 .. III .. ,.. III Q. 0 0 0 ::l . 0 0 r I n . . O' 0 ." fTI ."Z ~ 01 "U 0::> 1> 0 r I -I ~I ...... ...... Z OC ......C::o ...... 0 1> -< ::0 < ::03 ."z...... -< 0 0::> -< rn ..... 0::> 00 .,,-< "U01Tl 00 -< 1> C fTl ::0 OfTl ::01>fT1 00 rnrx ro -< r Z 1> lD 0 ......::0 fTI-< ::0-< ::orn-< fTI(f) 1> ...... 1> -i -i -i Z -; 0 ." 1> DfTI D-i -i 0 -i 01 -; D 3 -<0 C lD 0 or -<Z::o Z -i Z ...... 0 -< fTI ." I"'lfTI::O ...... fTI............ ......" 0 .. 0 '- ::0 ..... Z I lD ::0 -i-< DZO ZO ::0 Z Z 0 -i 1>fTl -i < 01 -<1Tl ::oC)::o C)::o Z fTl fTl Z D r3 fTlHD D '- fTl 0 X -< r r"U OO-i D::O "...~ "'OH -< ." 0 " = r ~rriC ...,r -i ..... fTlZ . fTI l1 .... (f) 10 ::0 -i-< ~Z ::O(f) l1 Cl:' "'OJ fTl -< 0 0 ....0 H ...... -i 0 I/O ::0 'fTl D ::00 00 3D 0 .... ...... ." < fT1 -< ZO 1'1'\~ 01'1'\ ." (.iJ 0 ." -i .... l1 1'1'\ lD Z ." Z .... ::0 0 I/O -<-< -i ...... I' (" 0 D r'1 . :r 0 ~ .. I"'l H (f) (f) ,., r -< ~~... ~;=!~S'~a~I:~~ fTl .".... t..,"<l ::0 8N III . rt III Ul 0'" 0< Ort::rrtp.,.,- (f) ... . .. \.It a:: ::r::l"'- o ftI 0... 0'< ftI .... 8 ::I UlO .... ." en." . ." ::. go e 6. ~ 00 . ~~ , 0 ~~~ ::I .... .... \0 .... :0::'" 8 rt 8 en II III ..... rt C ..... .... .... N ~ ." ~ 0 0\00 ....,.,- p.0"::I III ftI .... ftI ftI II ftI - 0\ .' . ::I .... 8 ::I ~~~:J;~"a...:- ::r 0 00 00 ::I .... .... ... 0 0 00 Ul rt ::I 0 .... , 'II: .... ftI 0 rtoo ....::soooo o . p. ." - P. ftI .. .. ftI .. ... ftI - P. I,.> I,.>UlO ,.- ... 0" 0 0 0 ~ ~ ." Pi ~~~S'~a~l:t~ ,.,. , .. ....111 ."N .. o :0:: rt III ClI 0'" 0< Ort::rrt",,,,- 80 .... .... ... ftI ,.,.::s,.- 08 0... 0'< 8 .... ftI ::I ... . ';., ....::s '" ."en.,,'.,,::goe6.~ 0 NO\ III P. p.g~ .... .... I,.> I,.> .,,0 .... .... 00 ......... 8~8fr.~:;'~ii:;' 8_ 0 0 00 III II: rt ::s ;;:." ~::I .... ::s ;;;:;;:1;;.......p.....~ 0 0 00 p. ,.,.Ul.... o ::r 0 0 00 l'"'t.., ::r c ::s 0 .... I II: .... '" ::s 0 III III 0"00 oo::s \00 \0 o . p. - ~ ::I 0"1 .. tD .. ... c .... 0 OUlO ,.,- ... .... p. 0 0 0 1 -' - ....'"1.... .... enl'l>> .... rtX ~ ." Pi .. ......l'l..C'l0 CD p.o ." N \0 .. o 0 ..... o...o::so....::r,.,.p.,.,- 8 . . I,.> I,.> ... '" rt. CIl O"'O<O,.,."'....ftI::s "'00 i.. .... .... "'1:1"- ." en." ~.,,'< goe 6.~ 00 ....N III 0 .. .... .... N ~ ." 00 00 0\0 ....::r p.g~ IIrt8 s::....rtC.... ftlenen .... .... 0.... III en III '" '" S ftI ., C III ent.., II: rt ::s "","",..........C. Q.. CD ::s rt .... 0 .... 0\ '" II> .... ::s O~O~O.... ....00 0 . 0\ 0 0\ 00 :1 a rt Ul .... II: .... '" ::s." ::rc::s ......,=.....,....\01 o . P. - - ...., 0"00 .. .. 0 .. ... ::r 0 0", I,.> 1,.>"'1,.> ,.,- ... '" .... 0 OUlO P. -, - a~I:~> .".... C'lG"l 0"8 ""Pi ftI 0 .. ..... .... ............Ill ...::rrtp.~ ., . ~ ~ ftI ::s P.rtlllUl 00'< ~lig g 0 ' .... .... .... III rt::s,.. "'0 ~ ::s ~ 8 ::r;:~~go~ N .... '" ........ .... P.gf ...." , 0 ~ "'00 ::I G"l 0...."''''88 Ul _ \.It .... 00 00.... II: ... ::s ~......p.....p. o ::r '" .... ::s ::I ... 0 0 00 en::l rtUl.... CD II: .... ~ 0 0 00 < ::rc::s ~. p. 0 0"00 - I ,.,- ~." Pi:O < ...."lI....l'l....C'lUll'ljt> . "'00 fC'l ....Ill>::s'" ......S::s......OCD 0 8 . .. rtlllUl.... ::s 0... <ort::r...p.,.. "'\.It .... .... ....cto rt ::I ,.. .... 0" P. 0 8 ... 0'< 8 .... ftI ::l CDO a- ::I .. ....0 .". p.e::so 0 ....'" rten P.::sfOP.... ."cns .,,::c p.1I: .... .... N .... ::S." 00 .... 0\ .... . 0... S rt en II III .... rt C .... - 0 N 00 = II:"::S .... Illg" ........s.. ::r 0 C'lC .... 1:120", rtrt :1S......a. p. ... 0 00 o .... ;. ~ ~ g ; ~ 0 ~.... .... ....' II: ~~ 0 0 00 ... .... ." 0 ."p. 0"00 '" .. \O::S" 0 .. 0 . p. '" - .... ~I :,p.;; ::::~ ~ ... ::s 00 p. 0 III = ~e: 8 ""Pi ...."lI....l'lC'lUll'l>> "'N ::;-:;-C ;;:;;;~~g.~g;~ "0 00.... ... . .. "'::S'" 080...'<8....ftI::s Ul 0 .... .... cto= 8 ." en.,,' ::goe 6.~ 00 ':c ... P.gf .... N N ::s .... 00'" f~ 8~lIfr~:;'~i:;' ." .... .... 0.... ~rt5 - 0 0 00 ....::r "'""~.-..C. c.. ::r 0 . ::s ,.,. "" rtUl.... o ~ 0 .... I II: ~~ ... 0 00 " III ::rc::s 0 0 00 C'l 00 0"00 oo::S\Oo::S O. p. ." .... ftI 0"1 .. .. " ........ 11 '" - enftl .... 0 OUlIll ,.,- ... < III ~ P. 0 0 o ::I I!. ""Pi ~~ t.., "lIl"lC'lUll'l>> .. ~ 6f ....Ill .... ::I .... 0 Ul P. 0 ....... .... ~ \0 ... . Ul "'<"'::rrtp.,.,- CIlO .... .... .... rt::s'" .....'<8......::1 0 0 0.... ,.,.p. .. en' =go~ 6.~ .... .., ~ \.It ::S." 0 0 0'" 0 p.g~ - 0 0 00 ... en "tn......".c...... ::r 0 . . I III ftI II: ... ::s 1ll<......"'SftI ... 0 00 ....:1 .... ::s ". () ....... Q.. C- o 0 00 I ,.,.-. .... .... . ...00 ." 0 .... ::rc::S 0 , II: .... ftI '" - 0 0"00 ::s 0 p. ... I ftI VI ~~~ ... .... ,.. I :'- ~::!;;: -... . Agenda Item No. : AGENDA REQUEST Date: .1111y 7.9. 1991 Request to .be placed on:' x Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: All 811!'l t 6. 1991 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much): Bid Award - W~tpr Main Extension - Pineridge Road/Church of the Palms Bid 1191-68 ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO Recommendation: Award to low bidder Metra Indus~ries. Inc. at a total cost of $98.823. ~J{/~ , ' III v ,I Department Head Signature: Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget Director Review (required on all items involvinq expenditure of funds): Funding available: ~ NO ~~liCable) ~ Funding alternatives: Ac count No. & Desc 7#,2ttt 44-,-5174 --<;%-.0 /-75< ~STRI8uTt Account Balance: 2 h I t-A P(<o eMENlS City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: (fr$/ NO fI~1 Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: "64hq( . Received: Action: Appro e jDisapproved . MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden, City Manager THROUGH: Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager/ ~ Administrative Services FROM: Ted Glas, Purchasing Officer Jjff DATE: July 29, 1991 SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 6, 1991 - BID AWARD - BID #91-68 WATER MAIN EXTENSION/PINERIDGE ROAD Item Before City Commission: The City Commission is requested to award contract to low bidder, Metra Industries, Inc. at a total cost of $98,823. Per the Budget Office, funding is from: ( ) . Background: Funds were allocated in the FY 90-91 budget for water main installation. A total of $ was budgeted for this work. Scope of Service - Furnishing and installation of approximately 2,600 feet of 8" class 52 ductile iron pipe in Pineridge Road from N.W. 1st Avenue to Northridge Road, and in Swinton Avenue from Pineridge Road to N.E. 19th Street. Bids for this project were received on July 12, 1991 from six (6) contractors, all in accordance with City purchasing procedures. (Bid 1/91-68. Documentation on file in the Purchasing Office.) A tabulation of bids is attached for your review. The Deputy Director of Environmental Services has reviewed the bids, and recommends award to the low bidder, Metra Industries, Inc. , per attached memo. Recommendation: Staff recommends award to the low bidder, Metra Industries, Inc. at a total cost of $98,823. Funding as outlined above. Attachments: Tabulation of Bids Memo from Environmental Services pc William Greenwood MEMORANDUM TO: Ted Glas Purchasing Officer FROM: George Abou-Jaoude Deputy Director of Projects SUBJECT: PINERIDGE ROAD/CHURCH OF PALMS WATER MAIN EXTENSION PROJECT NO. 91-30 - BID NO. 91-68 DATE: July 30, 1991 Please find attached a bid tabulation for the above referenced project. The three lowest responsive bidders are: 1. Metra Industries Inc. $ 98,823.00 2. Pipe Power utilities $107,050.00 3. Telcon, Inc. $134,561.00 Environmental Services/Engineering staff has reviewed these bids and checked their references and credentials. It is our recommendation that the city award this project to Metra Industries, Inc. in the amount of $ 98,823.00. The City Engineering cost estimate is $114,350.00 Funds for this proj ect are available in the 91 Water & Sewer Bonds, account #447-5174-536-61.78 (Budget Balance $248,000.00). Please have this award on the next City Commission agenda. GA: smm ATTS: File; Memos to Purchasing Project No. 91-30 (A) -, . 0 H-I I-' I-' ..... I-' I-' I-' H C, . 0 -10 ,(Jl ,f>. Vi N I-' 0 ..0 CO -..J (>. (Jl ,f>. (,.j ~J I-' -I C 3 rn-l .' . rn r 3: 3D 3 -< rn (/Jr - ,-- z ~ - ---- ----- .--.._- ----- -~-- I-' .., .-rn D< D.., (JJ(JJ D (fJ IO O(h Dn l0 ,f>. (,~ (h (/JrJ) D^Tl i(o,f>. 0(10, ~> CO LlO 0 ~) to < rH rrr. Irn (JJfll -<C o : Z : f- : r : r : "OH fl1 . -ID ro r (0 OD "OD 0;lJ -r 0, f'l rn fll '0 ;lJ DH 1>H DH 3H 01 '- Ir orn 0.., CO IO ;lJOJ zc, L rnX rnX rnX C f'l "OZ "OZ "OZ . Z 0 r- ;lJC LO .L H r;lJ D;lJ 1>fll fllC D1> < < < ;lJ "00 "00 "00 () ;lJ ..0 " 'rn OD D, DZ orn rrn ZO 03 "0-1 fll.t> rn(h rn CO -II CI CI CI I H ,.[) ,'X C-I Z;lJ ZG'J rnUJ -If]) -I -Ill llrn : ' : : f'1 -< ;lJ ;lJ ;lJ "0 ..... 0 G'Jfll Ofll 0 ;lJ-I -I "TJ Hrn C;lJ < < < ZO -IG'J -IG'J -IG'J 0 -I rn IO rno rnr UJ HH 0;0 ;0 1> -I 1>-1 D-1 D;lJ rn1> rnD rnD H H II 0 D OJ OJ IOJ (j) ;0 Z -13: rD rD r 1> Z1> Z-I Z-I Z-1 "0 0 ,-1 .....OJ ,;0 OJ cr or rfll rnD <"0 <"0 <"0 02 DfTl 1>rn DfTl Z , H UlH 0 r< C< D D' ZH fTl,"O fTl"O fTl"O fTl-1 Z Z Z ~ 0 H ro ro z' (JJ DZ H H H f]) 0< 0< 0< Z Z 0 ,0 (/J Z Z Z Z fllD fTlD fTlD (0 G'J 0 rn 3 0 G'J G'J G'J UJr UJr UJr UJ ;U rn < < < " rn (J) fTl ,rn ' fll ~h ", " ~: rl-' r..... r...... r...... ...... ...... N ..... ......, 'N -..J ..... VI -..J rN OfTl f:; (0 C,) C0 (J) "TJ (', -l C0 0 -(-i " 0 . . ,"0 I~ -- H , h I~ I~ I~ I~ I~ I~ I::: 1~ I~ I~ I~ I~ CXJ I ~ f\C:'\ z ~ : I a f!l, % ~ C\ (\ ;0 11 ,"" ~ H ...(\ ~I \ '"W\ , :-... I I ~l \ 'I \ "II "I I N, I I , If\ I ' ~ I vfi, I ~ g 0 ~ ~I 0\' %1 ' ~I ~1 ~ ~ G'J ~ ~ ~ - fTl %1 ~ ~ ~I lI\ G'\ ~ \:\' ~ I' ~I ;u }x\ ~~I ~I \~l \~I ~I ~,I ~I ~~I ~I ~~ 0 \~ \~ I, ~I D \~ \~ \~ \& , n~ \~ \~ \~ .(\ "( 0 \~ '-OJ I ()H '-. ![ ~ I~ I~ I~ I~ I~ I~ ' "' I~ I~ I~ )j I~ \..:, IO I~ , l~ ~~ C 0 <:) ~ I~ ~I; ;U~f-lH , () ~ \ tl ' . \ ~ "b 0 D-l ...t.J ~I \ ~"N I \ ' I ~ 1\ ~Il :-0 I \ \ '-Q NI \ ~r \ I ~.1 \ I..oOJ-( ~ ~I ~I ~J "- I \ 041 ~I ~I t llj ......c ~ " '1 o I r 0 "'T'J(hD"'T'J ~ N ~ ~ ~~I ~ ~ ~ ~ '\-1 ~ ~,? CIJ-I (J -.....:: ~I 1J- ~I -I HO' t~ \~ I \~ I \~ I \~ I \%1 \~ I ~~\ \~I ~I \% I \~I '\l I Ofll \% fTl"Ozr ~.&. ;lJ ;lJ "OOOD )...' I~ 1"1 I~ I~ I~ I~ 'I~ ;~ I~ IS I~ I~ I~ I~ I~ ~l DC,^Tl-( "^J ,~ rfll ~ "" I~ 30COOJ ~ ~I'\ '-.- !\ ~ I c" () "'-'\) ~11, I ' 01\ ' ~ I \.. \ \ '0 1 (.) -oj H rn ~I\ ~ I ' ~ II ~Il ~. ~ OD ~I\ ~I ~I L:lt(J)() w ~ ,. wI ~I ~ D..o I ~ ~' ~ ~, ~I ~I.' '\,{) ~ ~~ ao N ' ":b -I...... ~I ~ \) ~I C) ~1 ~I (0 \\" f'll ~.I ~I ~I \%1 ~~I g:1 ~I ;lJ l>l -l~- \~I ~I C\ 0 J,:,._ \~ ~ \~ \~ " \% \~ 3: -- 12- D ~ I~ J~ I~ :\. I~ .. H " 1~ IW I~ !g ~ I~ I~ l~ l~ z I~ I~ I~ C';J~ S\ ~ IB () fll ~I \ I \ C) C\ Q ~ { x ~I \ " \ .~ 11 ",tJ\ II ~~- r \ WI \ ~Il ~~ \ , '-. , ~I ~I t -i W ~ \ y\l ~I ' ~l -'S * fll ~ - I ~I N1 :z ~ C) \:) ~l ~I ~, ~I ~l ~ ' C':1 h <: f]) ~I \~I ~~I ~I ~I H \~ I ~I ~I 0 . \~ \~ \~l ~~I ~I -r ~ \~ \~ \~ \'t- \'E, ,~ "- l~ I~ I~ 1~ I~ Ik I~ I~ I~ I~ II::; I~ I~ I~ I~ ~ . W ' tl) \) ~ I{;\ )~ ,-\II I '\ (01 ~ ~ w tf> ~. \) I~ ~I~\ ~I\ 01 \ c, [ \ -..{J' ~I' UJ I ' ~ 1\ ::{\ I \ . I ,\ t-> I \ ~ ~l ,-wI 01. ~g ~ ~ ~ )'-.) ~ ~ ~I ~I ~I ~I ~I &1 ~I ~ ~I ~I k;l % ~ "'-..: I~ f 01 ~I ~~ I 0~ \% \~ \~ \;; \~ \~ \~I \~ \~ 1 \% \1 ~ ' I~ I~ I~ 1~ ( , I~ (-<\ I~ I~ '- I~ I~ It \\\I~ t\~ " ~ ~ i0 "I~ ~ ~I\ ~\ \.) ~I\ "'-, \ "'- '\... \.) 'Q \) V\ ~II ~~ . , \\) " ~ I \ \ V\ I \ \ ~11 ~ 1\ ~Il '(I , ~~ \!\ ~I ~ ~I ~I t'{)1 '-~ I ~ ~ ~, & ~I ~ ~ ~I ~~ ~I ~ % \~I ~I IS ~I l~ \~ I \~ I \~I \~l \~ I \~ I " ~l \~ ~I \~ I ~' \~ \~ \~ \ ~ ,K I I I I I I ,I ' I I I : I I I I .1 I I ! I I l I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I i I I I' I I I I I I I : I 'I I I' I I . I I i -- _,_____,,__n"n'..__' _ . .._-, , ,_,_" ,,,__....___..'___,,_,_,_..__ ,___,,,_ __ n ' Agenda Item No.: AGENDA REQUEST Date: 7/31/91 Request to be placed on: XX Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: 8/13/91 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much): Award contract for Fleet Management Application Software to HTE, Inc. for the AS/400 at a cost of $35,000.00 plus 50 hours of training at a cost of $4.250 and travel expenses not to exceed $1000. ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO Recommendation: The City Garage Superintendent, Assistant City Manager/Support Services and MIS recommends award of the Fleet Management Software contract to HTE, Inc., at a cost of $35,000.00, plus training and travel expenses. Department Head Signature: Determination of Consistency City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget Di~or Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): Fund'ng available: ~ NO Funding alternatives: (if applicable) Account No. - & Descr~tion: 501-3311-591-60.89 City Garage Fund-Capital Outlay Account Balance: ~/), t.1 City Manager Review: @ (~l Approved for agenda: YE~I NO Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: <6/'1 ~I Received: Action: Approved/Disapproved ~ -II MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden, City Manager THROUGH: ~Ob Barcinski, As~t. City Manager/ Administrative Services FROM: Richard Zuccaro, MIS Officer DATE: July 23, 1991 SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 13, 1991 - CONTRACT AWARD - FLEET MANAGEMENT APPLICATION SOFTWARE Items before City Commission: The City Commission is requested to award contract for Fleet Management Application Software to HTE, Inc. for the AS/400 at a cost of $35,000.00 plus 50 hours of training at a cost of $ 4,250 and travel expenses not to exceed $1,000. Per the Budget Office, funding is from account # 501-3311-591-60-89 (City Garage Fund - Capital Outlay). Background: Monies were approved in the 1990-91 budget for the purchase of Fleet Management Application Software as part of the City's computerized government managerial and budgetary accounting system. This application is a resource management tool that provides the necessary information to control and analyze f1 eet operation costs, measure equipment and employee performance, and schedule equipment maintenance, etc. (see attached flyer). A demonstration of the HTE software was held in City Hal1 with representatives of HTE showing how the system performs. Other cities, who use the HTE's Fleet Management System, were contacted. Responses were favorable. Recommendation: The City Garage Superintendent, Assistant City Manager/Support Services and MIS recommends award of the Fleet Management Software contract to HTE, Inc., at a cost of $35,000. plus training and travel expenses. Funding as stated above. cc: John W. Elliott, Asst. City Manager/ Support Services Jerry Rude, Garage Superintendent mis_fleet 07/23/91 15:01 en]] 1111 III - - . ~ .. ~. FIe t Management T he Fleet ManagelIl~n application is a · User-Controlled System Options - Provides resource management tool: that provides you with ability to customize system fUIlctions you with the neccssa y infurmatiun to to your own operating environment. ! control and analyze fleet opel"' tioIl l.'osts. measure · Application Interface - Interfaces with HIE's I equipment and employee per finance, and GMBA, Asset Management and Purchasing! schedule equipment maintena ce and facilityl Inventory applications, thereby automating the equipment usage. data collection pnxess. This result\) in lower I The application can interfa e with HIE's operating costs, elimination of redundant data , Government Management and udgetary Account- , entry, and improved data accuracy. ling (GMBA), Asset Managem nt and Purchasing! I · Full On-Linc Capabilities - Provides on-line Inventory applications. Fleet an$gement also interfaccs with automated refu ling systems. These data entry, error l:hel:king, fi!~ upuales, inquiry : interface capabilities help red ce rcdundant user and hdp dOl.;uII1~lllalioll. .::ntry and errors. · Default Coding - Allows you to set up default I Managers are provided wit tle~ible reponing field values in Fleet Management master capabilities due to Fleet Man gement's extensive files. Default coding reduces redundant data database, which captures co lete maintenance. entry, thereby saving time. usage and cost histories for e ch Jl>iece of · Multiple Location Support - Supports multiple equipment in your fleet. maintenance and refueling locations. System Benefits · Preventative Maintenance (PM) and Service · Provides detailed cost info Scheduling - Provides PM and service replacement analysis. scheduling with the following features: · Saves time by providing qu ck access to all · User-detined lists of PM and service tasks. equipment information. · Automatic PM service scheduling and job . · Reduces overall costs throu h aptomated order generation with an attached list of , I maintenance scheduling. user-detined tasks. I I · PM and ~ervil:~ frequency established for I · Reduces redundant data en I . h each piece of equipment according to ! System Highhg ts · Application Security - Li its user access to elapsed meter, and/or elapsed days, and/or I specific menus and menu ( tio1)s, thus main- elapsed fuel u~age. taining data accuracy while llowing controlled · Notification repol1 printed by department a,,:ress to system inf6rrnati that lists equipment due for PM or servicc · User-Defined Codes - AIlo S WIers to establish and the due date. I descriptive codes as well a parameters for ) ~~essing codes. j - ,t....'~,..\ 07/23,/'31 15:02 [1[14 ~ · Job Orders - The Fleet anagemcnt applica- e Equipment disposal tracking, which includes ! tion provides the folJowin job order features; the individual or disp(,)sal company that ! · On-line or manual job rder: entry. purchased the equipment, disposal method and amount received. · Tracks down time, reas n for work and · Miscellaneous infonnation file that gives I work classification. I · Freeform comments and task descriptions. users a freetorm notepad for listing addi- tional equipment information. · Attaches parts. labor an ouasidc (commcr- · User~detined special equipment tracking I cia}) services to job ord rs. that lists additional equipment added to a · Displays next scheduled M and service and pie<.:t: uf equiprnenl. any pending manufacture recall maintenance. · User-defined parts lists that provide mechanics I · Prints job order complet n summary, whkh with quick-reference parts indexes for each I details all charges attac and work done. piece of equipmem. A parts list might I · Notifies users of equip ent under warranty include items su~h as uil fillers, ~paJ'kplugs , I and air filters. during job order initiati{ n. · Billing - The Fleet Man ement application · Management Fearures - The Fleet Manage- provides the following equip nt billing features: ment application provides the following management features: · Automatic creatiun and nmsfer of expense e Equipment-specific costs and quantity tracking. I account transaction entr S to the account- ing application. Costs and quantities are tracked month-to- date, year-lo-date and life-to-date. · Billing for actual costs, eEquipment maintenance history tracked \ flat rates. I lite-to-date and categorized by maintenan<.:t: · Multiple expense accou t biUing. task. The maintenance history tracks costs · Tracking of project costs by attaching project associated with a maintenance task. mileage. nllmhers to fleet charge. issued parts, labor amI uulside (commer- · Equipment Infol'1'n3tion - The Fle.e.t Managc- cia]) repairs. menl application provides he tbllowing l equipment information fea urcs: · Equipment inventory m ster file that pro- vicks users with equip nt descriptions I such as make, model, I anufacturer. fuel t UTE, Inc. I ,/ ~ 390 N. Orange Ave.. Suite 2000. type, fuel capacity, billi g t~pe, account (' > ""'~?' Orlando. Florida 32~0l I numbers and tire sizes. 1407) 841-~B5 · (800) 727-lm88 I ..- '" " Agenda Item No. : AGENDA REQUEST Date: July 30. 1991 Request to be placed on:' x Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: August 13. 1991 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much): Bid Award - Co-op Bid - Gasoline & Diesel Fuel - Annual Contract ORDINANCEI RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO Recommendation: . Unleaded Gasoline Trans ort 148,000. Unleaded Gasoline (Tankwagon Diesel Fuel ~ J!t~J tp_/ Department Head ~gnature: Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget Di~tor.~eView (required on all iteas involving expenditure of funds): ,~--('CU II Fund'ng available: YES; NO ~ "_~ Funding al ternati ves: \llU\,Ui\U) ~j 6tQ s+ J (if applicable) Account No. & Description: Account Balance: City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: (fi~/ NO [/if Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: Action: Approved/Disapproved H' MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden, City Manager THROUGH: Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager/ ~,Administrative Services c!lJ FROM: Ted Glas, Purchasing Officer DATE: July 30, 1991 SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - August 13, 1991 - BID AWARD - BID #91-126/PR CO-OP BID - GASOLINE & DIESEL FUEL Item Before City Commission: The City Commission is requested to make multiple awards as listed below for gasoline and diesel fuel, at an estimated annual cost of $170,000. Per the Budget Office, funding is from: ( ) . Background: The Palm Beach County Purchasing Department is the lead agency for this co-op bid. Bids were received on July 8, 1991 from eight (8) vendors, per attached bid re-cap sheets and recommendation from Palm Beach County which was approved by the Palm Beach County Cooperative Purchasing Council at their meeting on July 29, 1991. The low bidders for Delray Beach are, as follows: Unleaded Gasoline (Transport) Coastal Fuels Marketing Inc @ $.0308 discount - Estimated Annual Costs - $148,000. Unleaded Gasoline (Tankwagon) B.P. Oil Company @ .0353 Discount Estimated Annual Cost - $16,000. Diesel Fuel 112 (Tankwagon) B.P. Oil Company @ $.0611 markup - Estimated Annual Costs - $6000. This contract allows for price fluctuation (escalation) based on prices published in the Oil Price Information Service (OPIS) for Miami. However the vendor markup or discount (including delivery and all other costs) shall not change during the time of this contract. Recommendation: Staff recommends multiple awards as stated above. Attachments: Bid Information Sheets Recommendation from Palm Beach County pc John Elliott Chief Lincoln Chief Koen Jerry Rude Brahm Dubin 'I." BID PROPOSAL BID '91-126/PR LOT 11: (Boca Raton, Boynton Beach, Delray Beach, Manalapan & Ocean Ridge Area) ITEM A. B. NO. DESCRIPTION '" "I< TRANSPORT '" "I< TANKWAGON - - 1. Diesel #2 + - S /gal. + - S /gal. 2. Supreme Unleaded + - S /gal. + - $ /gal. 3. Regular Unleaded + - $ /gal. + - S /gal. 4. Unleaded Plus + - $ /gal. + - $ /gal. "'*Calculates discount/markup to the fourth decimal discount/markup shall remain firm during contract period(s). NOTE: State brand you are offering: Brand , Refinery . Circle one +or - in each column to show discount/mark-up added/subtracted from/to OPIS price. LOT 12: (Greenacres City, Lake Worth & Lantana Area) 5. Diesel #2 + - $ /gal. + - $ /gal. 6. Supreme Unleaded + - S /gal. + - S /gal. 7. Regular Unleaded + - $ /gal. + - $ /gal. 8. Unleaded Plus + - $ /gal. + - $ /gal. *"'Calculates discount/markup to the forth decimal discount/markup shall remain firm during contract period(s),. NOTE: State brand you are offering: Brand , Refinery . Circle one + or - in each column to show discount/mark-up added/subtracted from/to OPIS price. LOT 13: (Loxahatcbee, Mangonia Park, Palm Beach, Wellington & West Palm Beach Area) 9. Diesel/Jet A Fuel + - $ /gal. + - $ /gal. 10. Diesel #2 + - $ /gal. + - $ /gal. 30 -- - ---- , ~~~NW~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ .~W~ ~ Il'GlIf ~O~~ 0 -.JOt"'... 0 "'l"'~o. 0 0 .... Q t"j .... t"t. f"'t'. . ..,... ... ,.,. I-f ~~.~ - Q.~~ - . ~~~ - .~~ - Q.~O . a ~..~~ ~ ~$~~ ... ~~.~~ ~ ~~~~ N =~.~ ~ 0< "l~:;'~ = .:;'~ ~ II .. ':!!! ~ :::: .. :;'': ~ ~ :i'~~::" B ._~~ -~m~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~ Ol~~~ ~~!~ ~ .~~ ~~~~ ~~.~ ~ ~ ~~- !~ - ~~-~ !~ - ~~~_.. ~~Q QW QQN =_QW~ QQN QQN" ~~~e ~e~ ~~'~ ~ ~ee ~ee E:';' rA' ;. ~ e'l ;,. ~ ~ i ,+++ ++,+ +,,++ ,+.+ .+.+ .t- >i ~~;j ~ It tEl '" . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ;: 1 ON 0000 0000 0 000 0000 0000 ~ a dO oo~~ ooo~ 0 ~~... oo~o oo~o ~ ~. ~~O~ N~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ VlN~~ ~! O~~~ ~~...~ ~ Ot~ ~~~~ OO~N .. ..... ." ~!~! ~~!! ~ '!!! !!~~ !!~! ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ wwwm ~~m~ ~ ~ ~;;; ~;s~ s sss ~~s; ~~~~ ~ * = <Q Q III I ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ -1'::::: ~g!. . . . . . . . .. . ~ . . . . . . . . ~ s:: ~... 0000 0000 O~!OM 8800 0000 = Q .1 ~w ~~~N O~O~ ~~ ~~ O~ ooo~ W I-f o ~...~... ~w~~ o~ ~ ~~~... N~CC ~" ~ = ~......w ~~w~ ~~ ~ "''''o~ -.J-.JN~ 0 . . 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ m w w ~ w Pi 'm m m m m ~ m QI QI ~ ll:I :: I ... MMMM MI-fMM I-f~MMI-f MMMM MMHH ~ ~ o~o~ ~~~~ ~~ee ~e~~ e~~~ ~ i . .. ~ : '8 I .. ~ ~ I- Z ",. I- ~~ ~ ~ i I~~+ ~~I~ +.1+1 ++1 + ++1 1 ~ ~ wa- ... ",. ... 0 ~ ~ . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . I I . . . I ... ~ ~ 0000 0000 0 000 0000 0000 ~ ~ ~ o~ ~~N~ ~N~O ~ NOO o~wo O~NO ~ dO ...Ot~'" ~N~~ ~N"'~ Ot~"'''' NW~~ ~ 0 ~. NN~W ......w~ ~ Ot-.JOt ~~OtN -.J~O~ 0 M III .. . .... It ... ~ t" ~ ~ 0 i ++++ ++++ +++++ ++++ ++4+ ~ S ~ ~ 5 1-" . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . ... n 0000 0000 0 000 0000 0011 . "'-.J~-.J -.J."'-.J . "'-.J~ Ot-.JwOt Ot~ ~ 1 ~Ot~~ Ot-.JVl~ ~ Vl~O Ot~Vl~ Ot~ - <Q ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 "" ~ 0 w ~ . 0 0 w ~ 0 0 WI ... o. : : ::: :: : S r D. _ III 1 - ~ 1+++ 1+1+ +11++ 1+1+ 1+1+ ~ a ~ :;:a~ ~ $ ~c: ~~ 0000 0000 0 000 0000 001' 0 = ~ =0 ~o~~ o~~~ ~ NOO O~NO ~o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~o~~ WVl~N ~ "'.w ~o~Ot W~ N ~ ~ = "'N~~ .wo~ ~ ~~m .NO. w'" ~ 0 .... .. .. It ... .... ::t- eA + ++++ ++++ + ++. ++++ ++++ ~ E .... lllII = !':I . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . t . . =- = NNNN NN~W N NN~ NWWN NNNN . ~ ~~~~ ~~g~ ~ ~18 ~~~~ ~!~! ~ ~ . r/v ~N~WH~Y~lY - t::J.,,:O:ww...... to' ..........,...~ to' ..... ~.......... \D to' Q:IJ -I Q'\ U1 to' . wt-,J..... to' t'l>'l"l"'OlO)OO 0 """ 0'1 11' . 0 WN....O. 0 0 0 to'''; o-!. . . . ... . ... ... ... ... , ....:O:l"l - <t'l"'tnc"'t::J - c"'tnt::J "'ctnt::Jt::J - C"'tnt::J - C"'tnt::J - l"l :z: .... C =' III .... 11' =' III C .... . III =' C ...'.... ... =' III C .... W =' III C ...' ... '" o-! :z: 't:l ...... Cl III . ...... Cl 't:l III .. 4Q ...... 't:l III III .. ...... 4Q 't:l III .. ...... 4Q 't:l III .. < Cl"'IllCfIl III c: .., fIl C III .., fIl fIl I'D C .... en III C .., fIl o-! III III ......Ill 1lI......1ll1ll ......1lI11l1ll1ll III ......Ill III a:u ..... I'D I'D .. l"lneO'IlI...... O'IlIS...... III 0. S ...... ...... O'IlIS...... O'IlIS...... .. "'>'Illlll'" III .., III .., III III ...... III .., III III .., III .. :0:'" 0. - 0. - 0. -c.. 0. - 0. - .. u>:o-C cw ccw c CWIll CCN CCW l:Il='.,,=' .,,='=' =' ." =' ... .,,='=' .,,='=' H .....,........... ............ ...... ............ ...... ............ ...... ............ ...... 1:"" C. C . C, .., C. C, ~ .... fIl fIl fIl C fIl fIl o-! III ..; ...... en f-- ~ + 1 I + + + + I + + 1 1 + 1 + 1 + I +1 + ...... >-i 1 .. "':z::z: .l"l0 :z: o-! I o-! 0 .., ::z: . . . . . . . . . . . . III -= ~ 0'" 0000 0000 OOOOt:IJ 0000 0000 =' .... CO U"lN-..JW O.....NW WNNW..... O.....NW OOWN fIl to' '" \O(.,,)U1c:7' 00011' W\OW\&)'=' tIao..W """00"",, 't:l t::J W-.J~N .....,.-JW 0"",,0'1 NCOC7\t<..) 0\......00'\ 0 0 .., '" ... 0 + .... ...... to' :z::z::z::z: :z::z::z::z: :z::z::z::z::z: :z::z::z::z: :z::z::z::z: 1 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 n o-! 0 l:Ill:lll:lll:ll t:lJl:Ill:llt:IJ t:lJt:IJt:IJt:IJl:Il l:Ilt:IJt:IJt:IJ l:Ilt:IJl:Ill:ll III I-0-oI H H H H H H H HHHHH H HH H H HHH =' .. OOt::Jt::J t::Jt::Jt::Jt::J t::Jt::Jt::Jt::Jt::J t::Jt::Jt::Jt::J t::Jt::Jt::Jt::J :or .. ~ .. III 4Q ..;J 0 ~ =' f-- f-- 8 t::Jt::Jt::J t::Jt::Jt::J + + + 1 + + + I + + + I + HHH+ HHH+ ....... Z '" tn tn tn tn tn I .. :z: 101010 101010 "':z:< 0 o-! .. .l"ll"l .., :z: I o-! ",. . . . . t:IJ III :0- ::z: 0000 0000 0000.... t::Jt::Jt::Jo t::Jt::Jt::Jo =' ." S 0 1 t-..)t-.)ow NNO'"'" NN 0\.0.1 t::=' H.......,....W H ..........w fIl n C 1 0,",,00 011'00 11'000 tI1~C/)o en en tnI 0 't:l 0 ( '" 0000 0000 0000 1010100 1010100 0 t:IJ .., ." .... ... l"l t::J o-! + '" ... ....... 0 >' I to' t:IJ + + + + + + + + + + + +:z: + + l"l t 0 o-! C t::Jt::Jo t::Jt::Jt::J III :0: t:IJ ........ .... ........ .... =' ... .... "'tnu> tn U> tn :or .... .... t::J 101010' 101010' ~ :z: il 0000 0000 0000 0 0 III n -.JCOO\OO -.I 00 C7\ 00 00 -.I 0\ 00 00 00 Q 11'0011' ,",,0011' OU'OUt 11' 11' 0 I 0000 000 0000 0 0 =' .. .. lO) .. .. - ... ( 1 -= ... ... .... w 1"'1' o-! 0'1 ::r ::z: - ....... ~ .... + ." :z: 1 + + + 1 + 1 + + I 1 + + 1 + 1 + 1 1 1+ ....... lID ~ I c:l "'z:z: o-! ....l"l0 .., ... o-! . . . . . . . . . ,., 0 0. ::z: 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 =' ~ .. 0... oo...w 00...... 00......0'1 00...... oowo fIl co .....JO"I....... o . ... 11' .0.11'0 W.....cnN ....,Jwcco 't:l >4 .. '" ....NNO .....\DU1\D .....Q)NOOt"O 11' 11' lO) 00 00.00 0 .. .. . .. .. ..,.. ." .. ... l"l .. o-! + '" .. ....... 0 .. 1 I:'" .. t'l gS :z::z::z::z: :z::z::z::z: :z::z::z::z::z: :z::z:z::z :z::z:z:z o-! ~ 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 ,., 01"'1' =' .c l:Ill:lll:llt:IJ l:Ill:lll:lll:ll CCll:IlCClCClCCl t:lJl:Ila7a7 l:Ill:lla7a7 :or .... '"i..' H H H H HHHH HHHHH HHHH H HHH ~ :z ~cn. oot::Jt::J t::Jt::Jt::Jt::J t::Jt::Jt::Jt::Jt::J ot::Joo t::Joot::J III n Q 5-0. 0 "'(1) =' n.... - ~ ,,",0 .....:1 .....~ - 0 + nQl Qlen + + + + + + + + +++++ + + + + ++++ ...... r-. I p..i.Qj "':z:..; 0 .l"lt"l o-! :l en o-!tn .., 'g ::z: . . . . . . . . . III 0'" 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 =' n co t..)NNN NNNN t..)NNNN NWWN Nto..)NN fIl ." ... ,., 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 't:l 0 .... 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 0 '" ... .., o-! n ... ." + t"l ....... o-! + + + + + + + + +++++ + + + + ++++ 1 '" 0 o-! I:'" ,., t"l =' ~ :or . . . . . . . . 00000 . . . . . . . . ~ 0000 0000 0000 0000 III .....,J ....,J -.J -.J -.I ...., -.I -.I ..,J -.I ...,J -J -.I ...... -.I ...... ...... ....,J -.I -.I .....a oQ 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 0 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 =' .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 71'1 .TJ N~WH:)'l J,J, 'l " l...:' '.) r.., t.o..' W to..> ",-- N N N N r-.l ......, N N N ..... ..- .... __ ..... ..... ...... ..... ..... .- U'_ ~ W N ~\ ~ w~' ~ -JJ ~I .. ~ ;J - ; ;J 00 T,i ~~ t ~ w i ~ 0 i ~ ~ ~ ~-~, : ~ ~ i~ I~ II ~\J _IJ ~ ~ ~~ '\ \l ~ ~ I~ '" ~,\) ~\ '" ~ '\ ~ ~ I~ ~ \J \: i>-' ') ~ ~\ \ '- '- <;), '\ ~ I~\ "0 ~ l;) ),;'....... \ ; \ l'\ Cl (\ ,e::; "" , ~I ~ ::p '-, ~' . I' 1'1 "', , , ~3 i;V , ~ .... . '" ~ : 1"-'\ l'- ~ ~ ~ I:' l' f\ ' ~\ ~ I' .~ ,,' ~ ~ ~\ ~ ~ l' "- ~ . I ~~. ;. " ':) l"\i ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ I ;r, ,,:"' '" .... ' .. ~ I't\ l"iol \\l \ ~ I' I ~~' 1 ~"I ~ ~~ ~~:;'\ i ~ I \~' " ~~ ~~~~ ! · -,.. -If'' K, \"... "'!'.:: "'- ~ "- I'-... \'. t.... '" I~ I~ '" No I'-.. f',. ~ ~ f'.... " )... ~ ! ~\ ~\ ~\ ~,~\ ,~~\ ~I ~ I~ 't, ~\ i~' ~\ ~\ ~\~. - ~ I~"~\ ~\ ~\ ~ !'\ ~ I'f Yt. 1\"\ "I~' ~ \\ ~:-::r~ ~ 1\ ~ '\\ ::.. ~- \\' '1\ '!A\ 1\ - - .,- - n, ..... ~ f-- 1IJ-1J.J -- ~ft'J- -- --. ""<:;'- ,1--'-\ " " \ '", "'3 ~ N .... I 'I ~ I ~ ~ 1\ ~ 'I '~ ~" ~ ,. ~ It... ~ I I~ ~\ l'\\ ,\ '\ ~\.. h\'. '" lil\' "ix' :. :!I' --':1 '\,-' 1 , )( I - Ii'-. I I i I~ I~ ~ ~ ~ I I,~ I~ ~,: t) 11"'- ~ u_'_+-_!___\___~ ~- ~I~ "'" 7't.~ ,~ IN , Ii....,., I~ ~ ~ I : ll:ll... ~-~ ~ l"- i I~~ I~ u,~ k1\ ., R ~ 1'\ ". ~:1 -- _ -- ,- ." ~ ~ I ~,'h'~ I~ ~,~ - .. ~, "" ,- 1-.. ~" Ii "- ~ ~ ~ I~,~ ~ "'- .u , ,.., ~ I I t' ~ [r.' ~ ~ I I~ . ~--!-- ~\ '..-+- .., ~\ w ____1___1__ ~ -- ~ -- ) ~ - ~ ~~ -~' ~ ~ ~- ~~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ f' ~, 1h~ ' ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,'J\ ~ I~' ~ ,,~[\\ ~ " ~ I't\ ~"ii, ~. Ii. !I\ ~ Ii\ ,'.0 r; r~-~ ~' ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~~, ~' ~'~" ~ ~~ "'-~ ~. ,...-;'--' "\ ,IS .~ ..- 'Y I' .... I~ ~ , f\ \' :-.. ~ lol.. 'OLl I~ ~ I). . ~~ ~" '" '~ '\" , ~. K! ~ t "' ,., ~ ," ,-, :~ "\t" --- -~ 'rn -,. ....' KJ. ~\ 0,;' ~ ~,. lr. ~.\:,< '" .~ ..;--~ '"':- ~.; Ic1 i:.':s ,....\.-:'" I\t 1"\ li) \ 11. N ' ~ N 't- I' 1.'\ ~' ~, \" -. 'Ill \"1\1" \-' IN, ~ - ~ :~ ~. \' ~ ~ \ IS ~,'. - - I~- ,. ~ ..... , ,v t- \ \ ~ \ / \ \ ,.~ \ ~~~~-:~~--~T-f~f~rl ~ __ ,. I \ ~ I I \ I ~ I ~- ~ I~ I~ IL:: ~~ ~ ,I .' 11 ~ ll~ I \ ~, ~ I~ \1 u'~'I\ \ ,'. \ \ tl ,,~~I~ I~: ~~I~ <f~--~ ~.::\:~::;~ :,-- ~'~ __ \'- 1-_ J I 1 I I I ~ I ~ I~ I ~ I ~ in_ ~I~\ "',J::! -I, ~:I ~.II, _J ~ I~ ~ ~ v I~ i~1" . ~ "~ ':tI \.l ~ "~ \'l\.'~ ~~u ---. ~- ~ 1- ,u ~ '" I \ ~ \ \ - I\'~ I ~ !N.h.~ ~ . ,~:r~\ ".., -,- '~j ~I,- I .., --3:;1! I I I"'" I I \ I .,I~ ~~;J" .-~.~.... --, .-L +~I~-t-I-.' -,.. ~ 1\3 I~ ~I""'~" ~ ~ ~ <:.1'.' ,_,u, ~i'u ~ I, --'~ ,-- I ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~' ~\ w ~ ~ ~ I i ~ ..... I~ ~ ~ I ~I~ ~~N ~ \ I ~ ~,i~j~-=':;~t"~~ ~-I=!:I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i~ ~ - t\ ~.,.., I~ II ~,~' -.~i::g ---' ,.' ~ ",. ~ ~ \:l J-~~ ~ ~ - ,,-f-- -~ V'l " "' .""1 ~' >- Cl\ b-.... >... '- It..'" :-.... --t~' 0.. ~,'-I" th ;"- ~ ~ I~ ~ I l"\'~ ~ ~ ..... ,. ~ I \ ~ ~ ~ ~~-.1/ ~ '}..\ -" 'f..' ~.U\ -;" ~~~ f [1,~. I~\jl ~'S '0 I ~-~'~--',i.~l;), :!l-~,!)II-.I--~I", ,\ 1\ ~ 1,\.Il r\ ,. '\) ~ ,I 1)-. nl 'l)fi '" mi'> ~ I !I' ~!u '-lS I~ :.\ ._~" '0 IV \) "I\l \J I~ 1;:) , , r'-:'1i,~" \ "'- .!-l\ <S"\. ~ \ I., 'S'<' IA """ -_1'\" I.. ,..,~ ~'lt'\" -c:s..I'. ' ~, ~ ~ ,.. 1;:)'~~ ,'.' \ Z" .~'.. ''I' ... ,...,..", ~ a. ,'IlS\ In '"""" ~ ~ ~ '..... ::"\ ...... -..;. ~ ~ t~ ~ '::::: :-t::~' , N ., -. ,~. C'I ""l I-~ ~~. ~ ~\ '..I~;- t~~ jl~. ~ ~\~ ~j\;~ ~I{?\~'I:?~ '4::: ~ ~" ~ ~ '\S ~ () \) () ~ ~ ~ ~...... I~ ~ ~ I I I, ,. u, . - ,," lu- .". I - ,'. n_"., .. .. I.,.. ..1- I' ". -'., I .. .". - ,.. t -, .. , - -1, I I -.. ., I '..',..',.'.-- ," -- 1- I' ~ I~, - , I I ' .. .. ,- "" ,...., j ... .. ., .,., I .n_ n., _" . -, - . I 'I" ' " , .....', -~ .:.. ,.. ,'. ",. ;:; ! I i I I I I ' I ,I' II . , I,.. .- I.. .. I I \' i ",' , i, I _ I : I l' '" .",.. .,. A i I I I I II ' I I I ,.. I, . " - n - I I ..I ,. I I I ... "", " I . ," . . Form J Date Sent: 7/12/9] DEPARTMENTAL BID EVALUATION FORM Co-OP Annual Contract For BID # 91-126/PR BID TITLE:Gasoline and Diesel fuel BUYER: Phil Ridolfn DEPARTMENT: Motor Pool/Fire Rescue NAME: Doug Weichrnan/Jar.k Frpnrirk~on DATE RECOMMENDATION RETURNED TO PURCHASING: The bid listed above has been opened and requires your evaluation. Attached are copies of the Tabulation Sheets and Bid Responses from the following: EVALUATE ENCLOSED INFORMATION, MAKE RECOHKENDATION, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN BY: . ANNUAL ESTIMATED USAGE $2.158.510.41 LIST BIDDER'S FROM LOWEST PAYMENT DELIVERY RECOMMENDATION TO HIGHEST BID TERMS A/R/O TOTAL OFFER NUMERIC "KEY" ONLY Coastal Net 30 24 hr. 1,840,206.53 (1) Transport B.P. Oil Net 30 24 hr. 1,191,646.94 (f 1 ) Transport B.P. Oil Net 30 24 hr. 384,702.96 ( 1 ) Tankwagon Port Petroleum Net 30 24 hr. 258,730.02 ( 1 ) Tankwagon Onyx Petroleum Net 30 24 hr. 280,929.70 ( 1 ) Transport Keernan Petroleum Net 20 24 hr. If Needed ( 1 ) Transport MAPCO ---- 24 hr. If Needed (1) Tankwagon KEY(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION: (PLEASE NOTE YOUR RECOMMENDATION ABOVE) (1) RECOMMENDED AWARD TO LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER(S) MEETING SPECIFICATIONS (See Attached) (2) NO AWARD, NOT "LOWEST" RESPONSIVE BIDDER. (3) NO AWARD, DID NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS. When recommending award to other than low bidder, detailed justification must be furnished below and/or attached. Technical information pertinent to the bid specifications and performance of the item(s) will enhance the award decision. Generalities will not be accepted as sufficient information. REMARKS: =========================================================================================== SIGNED: TITLE: DATE: '" . ' . RECOMMENDED AWARD TO THE FOLLOWING LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER(S) MEETING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEM NUMBER(S) AND TRUCK SIZE: B.P. OIL FOR TRANSPORT - 1, 5, 9, 10, 14, 18 B.P. OIL FOR TANKWAGON - I, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 15, 21 COASTAL FOR TRANSPORT - 2, 4, 6,8,11,12,15,17, 21, 20 PORT PETROLEUM FOR - 3, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, TANKWAGON 17, 18, 20 ONYX PETROLEUM FOR - 3, 7, 13, 16 TRANSPORT KEEHAN PETROLEUM FOR - 19, IF NEEDED TRANSPORT MAPCO PETROLEUM FOR - 19 IF NEEDED TANKWAGON WIL. DOR OIL COMPANY WITHDREW HIS BID ON JULY 13, 1991 AS PER MONIKA HOLDEN PHONE CALL. USED THE WRONG OPIS REPORT FOR DISCOUNT/MARKUP. MAPCO PETROLEUM WAS DISQUALIFIED ON THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S) AS PER TERM #11 MISTAKES, BID HAVING ERASURES OR CORRECTIONS MUST BE INITIALED IN INK BY THE BIDDER. LOT #1 - ITEM # 2, 3, 4 LOT #2 - ITEM # 6, 7, 8 SIGNED: TITLE: DATE: ," . .. Agenda Item No. : AGENDA REQUEST Date: 08/06/91 Request to be placed on:' x Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: Au&ust 13. 1991 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much): Bid Award - Hardscape, Sculpture and Landscape for Pineapple Grove Bid 1191-66 ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO Recommendation: Award to low bidder ARZ Builders, Inc. at a total cost of $94,153. Department Head Signature: ---;P~"-1J ~..u<~~ Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget Director Review (required on all iteas involving expenditure of funds): Funding available: ~/ NO (if applicable) Funding alternatives: Account No. & Description: 3~-4/4J-G7l-.fol-2 7 f"F.1) {1'/'N--L-It.fI()kl17)~.aID Account Balance: ~D City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: ~~/ NO (lr1 Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: Action: M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: David T. Hardin, City Manager THROUGH :f~bert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager/ Administrative Services FROM: Ted Glas, Purchasing Officer CO-K~ l~ ,.J!J. DATE: August 06, 1991 SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 13, 1991 - BID AWARD - BID #91-66 HARDSCAPE. SCULPTURE AND LANDSCAPE FOR PINEAPPLE GROVE Item Before City Commission: The City Commission is requested to award contract to low bidder ARZ Builders, Inc. at a total cost of $94,153. Per Budget Office, funding is from: ( ) . 6ackground: Funds were allocated in the FY 90-91 budget for this beautification project. A total of $95,000.00 was budgeted for this work. Scope of Service - Expansion of intersection nodes including curbing, removal of existing sidewalk and curb and installation of pavers and landscaping; Expansion of intermediate pods for landscaping and/or sculpture installation; Installation of mahogony trees on private property (in easements obtained by the City), in tree grates (in asphalt) or in sodded areas where feasible; Modification of existing drainage and handicap ramp access; Installation of four (4) sculptures on a reinforced concrete pad and anchor bolts. Bids for this project were received on July 25, 1991 from two (2) contractors, all in accordance with City purchasing procedures. (Bid #91-66. Documentation on file in the Purchasing Office.) A tabulation of bids is attached for your review. The City Horticulturist/Special Project Coordinator has reviewed the bids. and recommends award to the low bidder. ARZ Builders Inc. per attached memo. Recommendation: Staff recommends award to the low bidder, ARZ Builders, Inc. at a total cost of $94.153. Funding as outlined above. Attachments: Tabulation of Bids Memo from Community Improvement pc: Nancy Davila. City Horticulturist/Special Project Coordinator . MEMORANDUM To: Ted Glas, Purchasing Administrator Through: Lula Butler, Community Improvement Director From: Nancy Davila, Horticulturist/Special Projects Coordinator ~~ Re: PINEAPPLE GROVE - RECOMMENDATION FOR AWARD OF BID # 91-66 Date: August 5, 1991 The bid opening for 'Hardscape, Sculpture Installation and Landscape Installation for Pineapple Grove Way' was held July 25, 1991. Two bids were received. The lowest apparent bidder was ARZ Builders, Inc. in the amount of $94,153.00. The second bid was from Ocean Bay Construction, Inc. , in the amount of $117,508.80. I have contacted the references included with the bid for projects completed that were similar in scope to Pineapple Grove Way. All references were favorable. The 'Engineer's' estimate for the job was $ 93,827.20. Funding for the project is to be reallocated from the 1987 Utility Tax Bond Fund. l am recommending that Bid k 91-66 be awarded to ARZ Builders. Inc., in the amount of $94,153.00. ",' . . -- - V I'l .... H "" W I'l El > 0 ..-t 0 ::l 00 ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" Za:: () 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 1::.., <J:(!J ::l 0 0 eO 0 '" 0 0 .; 0 0 Cll Cll -0 l-< 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "'.., -oZW ... 0 0> 0 N 0 ...... 0 .; M 0 r-.: 0 00 0 0 0 0 "'.., <Il 0 0 ~ 0 .... 0 M 0> 0 0 -<t . 0 '" ell.... 10-l c: 0 -0 0 0 ~ 0 . N 0> 0 . .... 0 0 .... 0 El -iHQ. 0 . . N .... N "" 0 \C "" 0 "" 00 "'.0 0'1-0. U '" M .... "" .... ..... .... . . ~ -<t . N ..... "" M eO Cll ::l <J:<J: .... M M \C '" 0> ..... . COCll ~ ..... ..... ..... N 0 .., X#-lW ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 0 ..... 0 "" Cll.., U -IZ JlQ ..... ..... ..... 0 0 ..... . ..... e <J:O<J:H 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... ...... :- 0 WHI-Q. ~ 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... Ol'Q Q:lCOCll '" . 00 0 N 0 . 0 0 N 0 "" 0 N 0 0 0 0 .... ,.e", Ql 0 M 0 "" 00 0 M "" M N \C 0 0 0 .... Za:: () N 0 "" 0 ...... . M eO . -0 a.. . 0 . M ~~ >-IHO 0 N \C N .... N .... N ...... .... .... "" .... "" <J: u... a::CIlw -IOO::Z WH;:)O OCOI-H 0.1- ci, .... u...u...-l<J: Ql "" 00;:)-1 .., <J U-I :>-0 jj El 0 ::l >-ZCIl<J: 0 0 ......0"" .., 1-0 l- V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e", HH .CIl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \C..... Cll Cll UI-WZ e 0 0 . 0 0 0 '" . M eO 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,t:MelI"'''' <J:Q.H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... 0 -0 ok () 0 .., .., .., -I<J: CO 0 0 0 ,0 "" N 0 -<t 0 .... CO 0 CO 0 ..... . 0 elI'M 01 '" CO M 0 N "" ~ 00 .... 0 ...... . "" . '" 0> 0 ~.... .., El ;:)UW l-< . . M' 0 . ~ . . . . . "" .... ...... .... M 0 ..,.0 COCllQ. Cll ...... .... M -0 "" M M -<t M N -0 N .; M ..... e Cll ::l <IO<I .., .... N .... ..... ..... ..... ..... <Il ..-t COUl I-O::U ..... "" UlO .., <ICIl .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 0 0 0 ..... ..... .... Ql 0 '" Cll'" ::l ..... ..... 0 0 0 .; l-< . Cll ..... e XO l'Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ""00 '" :- 0 z "" 0 0 0 0 0 "" U"\ '" 0 0 "" "" \C 0> >,N ::l Ol'Q <I ~ a.. 0 0 0 0 "" '" . M . .;. -0 "" "" 0 . '" u .... I:: -l "" 0 N CO '<I" ...... '<I" ...... .... N - .u()"':", 0> 0 r-.: 0 ~ . .... ok ell I'l <J'M .... M M .... N M .... ..-t <l'Q >- I- <I <I >- <I >- >- <I <I <I u... ..... ..... >- U <I <I ..... ..... H W W CIl W CIl U W W W CIl -I -I CIl 0 W W -l -I I- -l Z 0 -0 0 .... 0 0 Lf) 0 (Xl 0 0 0 0 .... -i 0 Lf) <I "ot "ot 0 0 "ot 0 0- N IV) N 0 "ot .... (Xl ;:) "ot -0 ..... "ot 0 0' "ot "ot -i ,... CJ ... "ot '"" .. CIl 0. Z I: 0 Z W U H 0 W CO . 0 W I- H 0:: -l 1: a:: I- "ot U 0. .... I- W I- H -l <I ;:) CO W CIl N H W 0' 0. W 0 <I CIl (/) U ex: (/) Z I- ... a:: U 0' H a:: . . (/) 0. (/) (/) :>c:: ;:) <I H >-W :r: 0. X '"" a:: I- W l- I- I- 0. H W UO U CO .....-1 W U W U l- (/) CIl CIl 0 ex: ex: H ow I- W HZ 0. (/) 0 '- . CIl >- <I H:>C:: H HI- I- W <I -I -IQ:l (/) :>c:: ex: OH H H CIl \I') W Z 0:: X-I X XZ 0 U .J CO H 0 U ;:) 0 0. . CO l- N 0 <J: (!J W<I W ww '- Z H 0 X , 0 I- 1: U Z 1 (!J 3 I: <I ..... .J ex:z W a:: 0. '-l- I- I: > -l W >- I: 0 W 'W 'W -l X ex: w<I W W -l 'CIl W 0:: 0. <I I: ...J W X W 1:0 I: I:> -l W <I >- >CIl I: 0. I: ;:) t-)H -l 0 l- I: ::> I- <I a:: WH W w<I H -l 3 <r <J:'- W >- H U OX Z I- 0 0 " H I: I- O::CIl 0:: a:: 0. ..... <J: 0 0 0.3 0:: I- -l CIl <IW H CIl "ot I- U ,,,--. ~ , . . Agenda Item No. : AGENDA REQUEST Date: 7/31/91 Request to be placed on: XX Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: 8/13/91 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much) : Award contract for Accounts Receivable Application Software to HTE, Inc. at a cost of $10.000.00 plus twelve hours of training at a cost of $1.020.00 and travel expenses, not to exceed $1000. ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO Draft Attached: YES/NO Recommendation: The Finance Department and MIS recommends award of the Accounts Receivable Software contract to HTE, Inc., at a cost of $10.000. plus training and travel ex~enses. Department Head Signature: ?j? Determination of Consistency Plan: City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget D~or ~eview (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): "Iv ,~#i e Fun g available: YES NO Fun ng alternativ . (if applicable) Account No. & Description: ** SEE ATTACHED ** Account Balance: City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: {j~/ NO [7--'1 Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: ~ I.L IJ.I Received: Action: Appr ved/Disapproved ..," . . . M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: David T. Harden, City Manager THROUGH: Bob Barcinski, Asst. City Manager/ Administrative Services FROM: Richard Zuccaro, MIS Officer DATE: July 23, 1991 SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 19, 1991 - CONTRACT AWARD - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE APPLICATION SOFTWARE Items before City Commission: The City Commission is requested to award contract for Accounts Receivable Application Software to HTE, Inc. at a cost of $10,000.00 plus twelve hours of training at a cost of $ 1,020 and travel expenses, not to exceed $10~0. Per the Budget Office, funding is available as f0110WS:~l..,t.tfI.Vl..v f;eJlU<.etO tL4c{?/;t/f! 1. Application Software $10,000 - 001-1811-513-60-86 /) /1) jj'lJ 2. Travel Expenses $1,000 - 001-1811-513-34-57/4 LuJr'~~.()O 3. Computer Training $1,020 - 001-1511-513-33-57 iJ~tI?>~. Background: Monies were approved in the 1990-91 budget for the purchase of Accounts Receivable Application Softwa re as part of the City I S computerized government managerial and budgetary accounting system. This software will allow all authorized users (AS/400) the ability to track miscellaneous charges and payments with the flexibility to bill and maintain receivables (see attached flyer). A demonstration of the HTE software was held in City Ha 11 with representatives of HTE showing how the system performs. Recommendation: The Finance Department and MIS reco~mends award of the Accounts Receivable Software contract to HTE, Inc., at a cost of $10,000. plus training and travel expenses. Funding as stated above. cc: Joseph Safford, Finance Director Milena L. Walinski, Assistant Finance director mis_recivb . . 07/23/91 15:01 mE Acc uots Receivable , H TE's ACCOUlllS Recc v.bl~ soH ware , · Automatic Charge Generation '- Lets yuu set application helps yo str~amline opera- up recurring charges to generate automatically I tions by tracking mi celhmeous charges on invoices or statements. : and payments. The system a pts :to you r · Customized Invoices/Statements - HTE pro- organization, allowing you to flex~bly bill and vides invoice statemenl~ tailored to your needs. maintain all receivables. The apPlication also You can print them any time, by customer processes charges and payme ts; ssesses type or name range. penalties and finance charges pri~ts invoices, statements and delinquency n tice~; and · Delinquent Notices - Allows you to per- generates reports. sonalize collectiun currespondence using I System Benefits OfficeVision/40WM. · Write-Off Capabilities - Enables you to i . Helps you collect outstandi g revenue more write-off charges individually, and perform mass write-offs by customer and charge \:ooes. I quickly and efficiently. I I · Simplifies billing and trac 'ng <l>f charges. . ..~ L a ~,~~.1Ikeivable inter- ! .._'1':w.\~magement I . Saves time by minimizing a couqt management. "'~J,r~~MBA), allowing I · Allows you to tailor the a lica,tion to your ! 11ir] _.t.._~.,ifIb appli<.:atiOflS../ ! , needs through codes and 0 tioqs you define. · Streamlined Cash Receipts - Accounts I · Interacts with database for rapi4 data entry receivable payments are processed through , and inquiry. thc Cash Receipts application and passed to I . Reduces clerical tasks. Accounts Receivable for posting. i I · Prioriry Paymenl'i - You may apply payment I System Highlights 'to specific invoices or charges on l:ustomer I . All Information On-Line Allows you to accounts. . enter, edit, update and fin his~rical. current · Demand Trial Balance Reports - Maintains and pending account info atidn from multi- trial balance data in summary or detail. and , pIe locations. by customer type. · User-Defined Codes - s yqu tailor infur- . Custom Repons - Many flexible reports are mation to suit your organi ation. User-dcfined included with the Accounts Receivable appli- I intormation includes charg tyftes. customer calion. HTE provides a comprehensive "native" I types, aging control, penal y/fi~ance charges. database. as well as detailed file and field taxes and miscellaneous in orm~tion. information. This allows you to easily de1ine I new reports to meet your changing needs I using IBM's QUERY/4()()T"' report writer. I L, J - (oven ''/ {' r ,< 17, ,1L .'1'-C, . . MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden, City Manager FROM: Joe Weldon, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Bid #91-74 Veterans' Park Bulkhead Replacement and Marginal Dock DATE: August 6, 1991 Attached please find the bid tabulation sheet for the seawall and marginal docks at Veterans' Park. Nine (9 ) bids were opened on August 1, 1991 with the apparent low bidder being B.K. Marine Construction at $220,630. Also attached is a letter of recommendation from the project consultant, Coastal Planning and Engineering. Originally it was determined by our City Engineer that the seawall could be repaired at a cost of about $75,000. Coastal Planning and Engineering later determined that the seawall was in various stages of deterioration and recommended it be replaced at an estimated cost of $315,032 that included seawall, docks, ladders, contingency and engineering. This cost was upgraded last March to $350,000 for the construction costs of the wall and docks only. As noted, the actual low bid cost is $220,630 plus engineering fees. As you know, we applied for and received a 50% grant from the Florida Inland Navigational District for this project. Our share of the cost is estimated to be $110,615. Originally, when the cost estimate was $315,032, City Commission determined that $100,000 was to come from the Decade of Excellence Bond Issue and $58,000 was budgeted from the General Fund in account #334-4126-572-61.63. However, there is $100,000 budgeted in this account, per Policy A-2.3 of the Comprehensive Plan, that can be used for this project. Please note this is a reimbursable project and the City is required to pay the cost and then be reimbursed one-half by F.I.N.D. Lastly, because of delays in the State Legislature, we did not receive a signed agreement with F.I.N.D. until April 1, 1991. Even though there was a delay, F.I.N.D. did not extend its construction deadline of September 30, 1991. This gave us only a short time to engineer, permit, and bid the project. We still hope to be close to that date, and if not, ask F.I.N.D. for an extension. Please place this on the August 13, 1991 agenda for Commission consideration. 1 /) ( -411 /-- ....., / ",..- /.-,..--. I -, //?-v :' v ~ (( [(') \J t I (' t I f l /- / ,l (~ i". " J , D Parks and Recreation JW: j mh REF: SEAWALL. DOC Attachment . cc: Allison MacGregor Harty, City Clerk Yvonne Kincaide, Budget Officer .,; ...... ...... 00 0 ...... 0 'tl 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 QI..... ... ...... 0 00 0 ......0 ......0 00 .r; 00.... ~ 00 00 ...... 0 0 ...... ...... 'tl 'tl 00 00 00 0 0 00 00 QI I'l 'tl QI >. 00 ON 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..-t ;:I ~ 4.J ..-t . 00 O-D '11'\ .0 0 00 00 ~ :J'tl o 4.J ..-t u 00 00> 00 0 . 0..... .11'\ o ~ ~oM QI ~ ..... ..... 0<"'\ . . 11'\00 II'\N 0 . 11'\ ..... 00 00 00 ~ QI I'l ~H ..... ..... ~N .....11'\ .....~ N-D .....N <"'\00 NN ..... ..... ~ ..-l'tl 'tl.J:J .... U'tl oM ;:I << ~tIl ~ 0 ...... ...... 0 'tl oM 0 ...... 0 QI..... 4.J 00 0 0 0 0 00 cO 00'" oM U 00 ...... 0 00 0 ......0 ......0 0 00 'tl 'tl ~ ;:I 0 ...... 0 0 ......0 ...... ..... QI I'l 'tl QI oM ... 00 00 .0 00 0 00 ~ ..-t ;:I ~ 4.J ... 4.J 00 00 00 O-D 00 0<"'\ 011'\ 00 00 ~ )"tl o 4.J '" Ul 00 00 0..... .0 . 00 ON 00 00 o c:: ~oM > ~ 001' 0 . . N 0> ..... '. ..... ..... ..Q~ I'l '" 0 11'\11'\ 00- .0 11'\ 0- .....<"'\ N 11'\ 00 00 ~ 'tl.J:J P.U 11'\ 11'\ II'\N N..... ~N .....~ N-D ~..... <"'\C"'\ ..... ..... .... U"tl oM ;:I << ~tIl ...... ...... 0 QI 0 0 00 ~ 00 0 00 0 00 .,; "tl 'tl c:: 00 ...... 00 0 ......0 ......0 00 QI I'l 'tl QI oM U ..... ......0 0 ...... ...... ..... 4.J..-t ;:l ~ 4.J &~ 00 011'\ 00 00 0 0 00 0- o )"tl o 4.J 00 11'\ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 . ~ 0 ~ ll:loM 00 . 00 ON .0 .0' 0 00 00 0- ~ QI e e ..... ..... . ..... 0 0..... .11'\ 11'\ "tl..-l"tl 'tl.J:J o 0 11'\11'\ N ..... NO 11'\ ~II'\ 0 II'\N 11'\ 11'\ 00 ~ oMU"tl ~ ;:l I-<U NN II'\C"'\ ..... -D ..... 0- ..... <"'\ .....N N -D ..... ..... ..... ..... .... 0<< ll:ltll ...... ...... 0 'tl 0 QI...... QI ~ 0 ...... 0 00 00.... 00 0 0 0 ~ 0 00 ...... 00 0 ......0 ......0 0 00 ..... 'tl 'tl oM oM 0 ...... 0 ......0 ...... 0- QI e "tl QI ..-t4.J 0 0 0 NN 00 ..-t ;:I ~ 4.J QI '" 00 011'\ .0 00 00 )'tl o 4.J ~~ ON 00 O~ 011'\ 00 011'\ <"'\ <"'\ ~ ..."tl NN 00 O-D .N .11'\ ON -D -D 00 o ~ ll:leJ o ~ II'\~ 00 . 0- 0..... . ..... C"'\ ..Q~ .c ;:I 0000 .....N .~ 11'\ 11'\ -D N 11'\ 11'\ 00 00 ~ 'tl.J:J tIl 0 ..... ..... <'"1N N..... II'\C"'\ .....~ N'l) ~...... <"'\ <"'\ ..... ..... .... U"tl oM ;:I ~ << ll:ltll 4.J Ul 'tl ;:l ...... 0 QI...... 'tl 0 ...... ...... 0 00"" ..-l c:: 00 0 0 0 0 cO "tl U'tl H 00 ...... 00 0 ......0 ......0 0 00 ...:... QI e QI QI ~ 00. 0 ...... -.; 0 ......0 00 00 ..-t ;:I .c4.J 0 00 O'l) .0 00 0 ..... )"tl U 4.J U 00 0..... 00 0<"'\ 00 O~ 00 00 00 '" o c:: ..-leJ P- 00 'l) 00 0..... .0 .N 011'\ 00 00 ~ QI '" ... 'l) 00 ...... ~ . N ..... ....... 00 ...... ..-l"tl ~.J:J QI 0 00 ......~ '11'\ NO N..... ..... 'l) 00 ~ U"tl '" ;:l I- tIlU 0000 ~N II'\N <"'\N ..... C"'\ NII'\ ~...... NN ..... ..... .... << ll:ltll "l'Z "tl r--W ...... ...... 0 QI...... I E Ul Ul 0 ...... 0 00"" .....W OOQl 00 0 0 0 0 00 .r; "tl "tl O'U 00 oM 00 ...... .; 00 0 ......0 ......0 00 QI e "tl QI <I o ... 0 ...... .; 0 ...... ...... 0- ..... ;:I ~ 4.J J::ll:..J ll:l 4.J 00 00 .0 00 0 0 NN ..... )"tl o 4.J Ul 00 ON 011'\ O~ 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..; o ~ ll:loM U Q.~ . ;:l 0000 . . <"'\ 'l) 0...... .0 '00 0 'l) 'l) 00 ~ QI I'l <IOWU U'tl . . 0000 C"'\ . . . N O~ .11'\ . . ..... ..-l"tl "tl.J:J WHa::O . ~ ..... ...... 0> ..... ...... 0000 ......co ~ C"'\N ..... ..... 00 N U'tl ..... ;:l roro 0 ...:lH NN N ..... N..... N..... .....N N'l) C"'\OO ..... ..... ..... ..... .... << ll:ltll 0 --- >- I <I..J c:: 0 "tl <I W<I 0 ...... QI...... oM>. 0 ...... 0 a::CIlJ:Z 4.J 00 00 0 0 0 0 cO 00 "" "tl ..JO~H 00 'tl 'tl~ U 0 00 ...... .; 00 0 ......0 ......0 ...... QI e WH..J(!J ;:I..... 0 ...... .,; 0 ...... 00 0 ..-t ;:l ~ 4.J Oro:::>a:: ... 0 NN 0...... .0 00 0 0 00 00 11'\ )'tl ~eJ ro<I 4.J c:: ..... ..... 0<"'\ 011'\ 011'\ 011'\ 00 00 00 .; o ~ 1.&..1.&.. E Ul.c ..... ..... 0> 0- 011'\ .N 'N 0 00 ~ QI ~ U . <'"111'\ <"'\ . 11'\ . 0<"'\ .0 11'\11'\ 00 ~ ..-l"tl "tl-g OO~ o QI ..... ..... ~~ ...... ~II'\ N..... 'l) 00 ~~ ..... ..... N ~:i1 a:: 0 UI-< ..... ..... N ..... ~N N..... ..... <"'\ .....~ NII'\ .... ~tIl >-Z<Iz 1-0 Q. <I ~ 4.J H H ~ Ul "tl UI-CIl 0 QI...... I1l ~ 0 0 00... <IZ I'l 0 0 0 0 0 'tl "tl ...I <I ..-tU 0 ...... .; ......0 0 0 ......0 0 0 QI e "tl QI :::>a:: '" 0 0 ...... -.; ...... 0 ......0 0 ...... ..... ..-t ;:l ~ 4.J row &~ 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 )"tl o 4.J <II- ON 00 00- 011'\ 00 00 00 ..; o c:: ll:leJ oM 0 .0 O~ ON .0 011'\ 0 00 c:: QI I-W >.... ~ 00 00 00 . O~ .N 0 <"'\ ..-l"tl "tl.J:J > ~~ . 0- ..... 0 ..... ..... 11'\ ..... 0 0 ~ 00 N U"tl ..... ;:l ..... N..... ~N N..... OON NII'\ 11'\ ..... ..... ..... .... << ll:ltll c:: "tl 0 ...... 0 QI..... ..... 0 ...... 0 00'" QI U 0 0 0 0 0 0 "tl "0 c:: U 0 0 ...... 0 ......0 0 ......0 ......0 0 00 QI c:: "0 QI ..... ;:l 0 0 0 ...... 0 0 ......0 00 ...... <"'\ ..-t ;:l c:: U ... ... O~ 0 00 0 'l) )"0 o U ~ ;;; 0 0 011'\ 00 000 00 00 00 00 00 0 o c:: ll:l 'g 0 0 .0 O'l) .11'\ .0 00 00 00 c:: 1lI c:: ~ ~ 0..... 011'\ 0 O~ .0 00 N ..-l"tl "O.J:J ~ 0 C"'\ C"'\ 0 II'\N ..... ..... 0 0 00 N U"O ..... ;:l ll:lU ..... ..... N...... II'\N <"'\N .....N NII'\ ~..... 11'\ lI'\ ...... ..... .... << ll:lU'> ro to 0 >- CIl 0'1.&.. <I "tl.&.. Lfll.&.. r--<I Lfl<I CIl CIl I- .........1 Lfl..J LflW ~..J N..J NW NW ........1 ........1 CJ Z Z 0 0 H (f) ZH Z 3 0 ~ ~ I- Z Z 01- 0 WZu.. 0 3 OU OU Z <I 0' 0 0 H<I H ZHO Z I- ZO ZO 0 U H ...... H I-N I- CIl <I <IO <IO H H 0 J: 'I- 0' I- <IH U 0 u..O>-W u....J l- I.&.. W (!J Q. 0' Q. N..J :::> <I O<II-H J:..J O<I J:..JCIl J:..J <I H I- :::> W ...... H HH a::3W WHI- CIl..JQ. Z CIl..Ja:: CIl..JCIl a:: Z <I 0 U a:: ..Jro I-WJ: I-J:ZH H<I<I I-HCIl H<IW H<II- 0 E :::> a:: X . U HO CIlZ~ CIl~H..J ZI-a:: CIl(!J~ ZI-O ZI-<I WI- W ...I J: W ... CIl roE Z ..J Z..JUH a::CIlQ. za::U a::CIlZ a::CIlw I-CIl 0 <IWI- ....... 0 W Ow Ou..:::> 0:::> HI- :::>ZH O<IO :::>ZW :::>Z..J HW Z >U (f) 0 EO uoro uco>:::> I.&..Ha:: UEO I.&..Hu.. I.&..HU CIla:: H WH.... l- I- a:: Z (0 ..JQ.(f) w :::> E <I E E (9 W I-Ow E :::> I- OHI- O <r H .... ('oJ '1 .... Lfl ..0 ..... CO 0' I-COH U '-~ - .,.10 08/06/1991 15: 17 P.02 COASTAL C. OeGA'" "NQ'M. (. "'....,. ~n^~T^1. gtJ~VJ:'YR COASTAL p~ANNrNG & ENGINEERING, INC. RIOI.OIJICAl eTUOIt:~; GCOTCCI4NICAL SL....VIL;U; ~OCA RATON: 2481 N,W. eOCA RATON BOULEVARD. BOCA RATON. F'-L 33431 r4r.J7] :'lEl'.F.I1C1? TF-._~r-AX (407] ,391-91 16 SAr.l^!!:O'l'^: 1 BCS MAIN STI'I8ET; eUITE BOO. !!l^"ASOTA. FLnRll"JA ::'l4?::'lf,l (813) 365-5957 TELEFAX, (81 3i 9!54-BD31J .JAl":Kf;;nNVII.l.E 1322 CHABue OOUI=lT NrJRTll, nRANGE PARK. FLORIDA 32073 (S04) 2B...H:,039 l'l:L1:FAX 1904] ~e4-tiO~a August 6, 1991 Mr. Joe Weldon, Director Parks and Recreation Dept. City of Delray Boach 100 NW 1st Ave. Delray Beach, PL 33444 RE: Recommendation for Award of Veterans Park Contract Dear Joe: We have reviewed the 9 bids that were submitted and opened on August I, 1991. The bids were reviewed by Ms. Jackie Rooney of the purchasing department for mathematical errors 111 the bids and were ranked by her according to the costs. The lowest responsive bidder was BK Marine CoIUitruction, Inc. (BK Marine). We reviewed in detail BK Marine's bid to ensure that all components of the bid were included. BK Marine submitted a list of work which indicated that they have recently completed similar work. In addition, they were the contractor who constructed the docks and seawall at the City Marina several years ago. We spoke with Jim White of BK Marine about their bid. Jim White is listed as one of two certified general contractors in their bid. Jim White said that BK Marine understood the potential difficulty of working near the overhead and underground utilities and incorporated that fact into their bid (conference report attahced). Since BK Marine is qualified to do this work, has indicated that they thoroughly evaluated the work in maJdna their bid, and their bid was the lowest responsive bid, we recommend that the Qty award the COntract to BK Marine Construction Inc. Very truly yours, COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, lNC. L~ 'm E. Beachler, P,B. Vice President cc: Doullas Mann, CPE Jim Bryant. BK Marine . ' . 08/06/1991 15: 18 F'.03 - COMM. NO. 4818.83 DATE 8/2/9l . TIME 3:00 PM TELEPHONE FROM . DOlli. MWUl CONPlR'NCE REPORT' FROM Jim \Vhite COMPANY BK Marine. Inc. TELEPHONE '~-421.2321 LOCATION --UilPthouse Pt., Florida SUBJECT: . Ye~rans Parks Bid STATUS: - I phoned Jim White to discuss BK Marine's bid with him. I informed Jim that BK had the lowest bid and that we were in the process of evaluating an of the bids. I asked him whether he had visited the site prior to making the bid. Jim indicated he had not, but that the she had been visited by several members of the company. Jjm said they were aware of the overhead powerlines and the added difficulty that would result. I asked whether BK had contacted the utility companies concerning the utilities in the vicinity of the project. Jim indicated they had not, but were aware of the potential problems that may arise. 11m asked whether it was required to contact the utilities prior to the bid. I said no. I mentioned to Jim that BK's bid price for the panels at the utilities was lower (per linear ft.) than for the rest of the bulkhead.. Jim said they were aware of this and that they had lowered their bid on this item in order to get the job. I asked Jim how they would handle working near the power poles. Jim indicated that by placing the piles and panels from a barge, they will stay 10 feet from the electric wires (an OSHA regulation). The deadmen will be placed with a backhoe from the landward side. Jim also said that they realize that it will be necessary to stabilize the power poles during construction. Jim asked if we were going to recommend BK for the award. 1 said that I had to discuss it with Kim Beachler, but that it looked positive. cc: Kim Beachler .j ,~ I i' , '. ! - . Agenda Item No.: AGENDA REQUEST Date: August 8. 1991 Request to be placed on:' xx Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: August 16, 1991 Description of agenda approval by City Commission of Five Star Construction for the construction of S.W. sidewalk A Decade of Excellence Pro'ect . Amount of 91-69' P Funding source #225-3162-541-61.44. ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: ~/NO Draft Attached: ~DS/NO Recommendation: Staff recommends approval for Five Star Construction in the amount of $te5.36~.uO for the construction of S.W. 4th Avenue sidewalk. .... ~i+,. J ",'1',0<.' Department Head Signature: #~~'''~~J.f o/~~I Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: ~ City Attorney Review/ Recommendation (if applicable): Budget Director Review (required on all ite.s involving expenditure of funds): Funding available: YES/ NO Funding alternatives: (if applicable) Account No. & Description: Account Balance: City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: @/ NO fl'>V( Hold Until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: Action: Approved/Disapproved ~ MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden city Manager ~ THRU: William H. Greenwood uA Dir. of Environmental Services FROM: George Abou-Jaoude Dep. Dir. of Environmental Services/ Projects SUBJECT: S. W. 4TH AVE. SIDEWALK BID #91-69 Project #91-55 Date: August 8, 1991 Please find attached a bid tabulation for the project stated above (A Decade of Excellence Project). Environmental Services staff has reviewed these bids and recommend award to the lowest responsible respon~ive bidder "Five Star Construction" in the amount of ~3,36g.00: 9I;Jb'},CC I'M Funding source account number 225-3162-541-61.44. GAJ/gm Att: cc: Interoffice Memos from Engineering Dept. File: 91-55.40 File: P:gj9155.doc ".1' '" ~\ I~ I~ I~ I~ I I ~\ I ~ \ ' \ \ ~\ \ 1%\ \ \ :'~ , \t- o- () ~ ~l I ~ '0 B ,%.~J ~1\J " \J C'r) \l) ~~ \)~ "" "- IC() I; I IJJ ~ ~ I~ I~ I \)( [ ~ I ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ I 1\$ '-- "- \:) Q "z 1\3 I I I I I~ ~ () I I I I : __ \J I <a\ ~tl~ ~II ~~ ~\I ~\. ~\ I ~\ ?\ I ~\. ~\ ~\ \ \ \ \ \ I~\ oh !" \) ~I~ ~q ~\ I~ "< ~ ~ \t- ~11'l. ~l~ ~ ~ I~ .~ ~I~ \ ~. ~ ~ I ~ " ~. '::. ~ "- " , "-I~ ~I~ C1Jo-.. ~I~ ~ ":::, ~ . .0.::: I , [I'( \sY1'" ~ I~ I I~ i. ~~ \) ,~ " ~ ~ ~ I I~ ' " I I" I I I I I I I , \)~ ~;. .' ~ll~\ ~I.I~ gl ,~\ ~, )~ ~\ I ~\ ~\ I ~\ ~ \ 'Q\ ~\ I~ t\ ~ ~\ '~\ - ~~ , ~ \J) ~1<:5 ~I~ ~I~ I ,,~ \:) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ie; , ~ ' t'( ('(J ~I~ 'l\, {yt <;) I\:) ~ ~ \" I \\) ~ I '\l-= " ~ I '\J~ '\\'1 ~ : I~ I II() ~1 '~ \iY1\n " "- ""- I I~I i M U-:~ ',-- I I I' I I ' I I I ! ~ I I l i . I ~\I~ ~\1; ~, I z\ ~\ I~\ \\ I 'l.\ ~ ~\ ~\ I ~\ ~l ~\ \ \ IS " \~ \ \ ~B () 'J ~ I B \~ ~ ~I~ ~I ~ ~I~ - ~ '~ ~' ~ . Q ~ Q ~~ ~ ~ :-< \X) \Yj l'vj IV) " ~ I~' \.) ~ ~~ W ~~ I~ I~ I~ \ "~I ~ ~I ~"' ~'I ~ r I~ ~~ I~ ~l~ ~~ '........ ,," "" > ~~ I I 'I ' I I I I I" I, <! I I l :I: tQ t lflt- lfl"<t ~\ I~ ~\ z\ I ~~ ~\I~ ~\ I ~~ '~I ~~ ~ I ~\. ~\ I~~ ~\ Il:\ ~ I~\ It I ..-jt- ~\I~ ~ ~ ~ \0 ~~ ~,~ :I: Cl-(j) ~ % '\:) ~ ~ l\. U(j):tl:W ~ '\f: t'\.. ~~ ~ ~ "" \:) <!O 3 ". \Y) \Y}' lY) \);) () , J~ ......... " I~ "...1 ~ ,,--- I t); ~~ WHt-:I: I~ l\ft \n"' IIJt ,~ I'. j \Sl I ; rnOOUt- ~~ "" I w::> ;~ \.[) I' ~ "( I 'Sl J : >-l1..r,0 ~~ I <!00(j) ,I I I 1"- I 0:: 0:: I I ' I I I , ...JZa.Z ; WO 0 o H . I t-Cl-z ~i~ ~\I~ ~\ I ~\ () \ ~\ ~\ ?\ ~\ I ~\' ~\ I~' ~\ l~\ 'I' ~\ I~ I~ ; l1..<!\Q0 \~ , O...JIH ~ ~ t'(1, '\::\ ~:'~ I.r) \fl' <;) ~ ::>..-jt- ~ ~ ~ ~ I ,>-roCl-U R: "- ,,/\S .().., '0 B ~'f: ~ !'\..: -::) ~ ......."- '\J , t-<! ::> ~ ~ I~ <'-(Iii-. \ " I '"$J . \J " CXJ ~I~ \::l ~ I I~ \ Ht-:tl:o:: I~ :~I~ ~'I~ 'I -~..... U t-- ~ ti ~ ~ 1 O(j) " , ,..1''- HZ ~ ......." " Cl roo ~ ~ I I I I' f v j"Q ! : U ~ \} I , ~ \.l I" ~ "-,~ ...J <! l1.. : 3 >- (j) l1.. l1.. W t- (j) ...J :I: 0 H 0 U :I: H t- O 0 l1.. 0 <! U (j) (j) z lfl lfl ...J 0 W <! ...J <! . I'f) " W ::> ..-j . 0 . ..-j ..-j CJ I'f) ('oJ ill " ..-j " C!J W Z U (j) (j)H Z W WO:: <!. ...J~ ~ ...J .:.J ...JXC!J ...JX<! ...J 3 ...JU U ...J ...J ...JOZ ...JOW ...J 0 (j) <!H H <! <! <!OOH <!roro <! . ...J C!J Z Z t-::c :I: t- t- I- 0:: t- I-:I: ...JW Z 0 0 (j)t- t- (j)~ (j) (j)...J<! (j)...JU (j)UC!J <!U H H 0 H Z . Z Z Z...JW Z...JH Z...JZ H 0 t- ..-j t- Z H: lfl: Hro H H::>ro H::>l1.. H::>H 000:: 0:: <! a. 0 "<t \Q 0:: t- a. a.lL. EO <!a. 0 U :I: W H ~ t- ~::> ~H ~ U ~ <! ~ <! ...J UW H OC!J U ..-j t- ~ U~ U I ::> WH wo:: 00:: E wu l1.. H::> X Q'\ a. :I:...J ::>...J :I: :I: 0 ::I:t-l1.. :I:t-t- :I:zC!J C!J::> O::Z H roo W Q'\ H (j)<! O::<! (j)l1..a:: (j)Z (j)Wl1..(j) (j)W (j) (j)<! Z(j) <! Z 0:: ..-j 0:: H3 t-3 H W HO HO::<!O:: HO::Za: H W H 03 E W:I: ........ U ZW (j)W ZWt- ZU ZUa:W zuow zO...J t-a. WO W (j)t- . (j) a:o zo o::a.t- a: a:::Zt-> a:ZZ> a:w<! (j)E O...J 0 <! (j) Q'\ W ::>H OH ::>>-::> ::>: ::>0........0 ::>0........0 ::>W3 w::> H...J Z ro..-j t- ..-j 0 l1..(j) U(j) l1..t-t!l l1.."<t l1..U3U l1..U3U l1..(j)(j) t-...J ><1: H Z ...J(j) W >- E <!E E . ...J W t-W E ::> t-:tl: . . 0 ot- 0 r, H .... ('oJ I'f) "<t lfl \Q " ill Cl- ~ t-H U \ \ \ , .\ .\ , .. - --------.- i- '. I , ; " -/ I : . I , , \ " i ! , ! I ~ ~I~ ~\ I~\- ~\ I ~\ ~\ Ir.\ \ I ~\ \ I <:.1. \ I ~\ \ P\ \ \ t I \ \; ~ t'( <;J ~ ~ Q ~ <:;) ~ \}, ~ ~I~ ~ ~ , ~\3 .1:\) "I~ " ~ \:\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \\) '"'IV) I~ I~ ~ "" :II ~ ~I\;:) ~I~ I~ W I~ I~ I~ I ;:) } ~ "'-" ~ ~ Cv) '\ 'S ; Z ~ ~ ,~ ,~ W ~' I\i) 11'1) ""- I" I~ : > I I I <J: \) ~ I ' I I I" x \J\) \fll- Ul'<t ~II~ ~\ ~\ I a~ ~\I; \ I Z\ \ I ~\ I l t\ \ 1\ \ \ 1\ I ~\. I \::l 1\ -ll- ~\ I" ~ ~ ~ ~ <;J ~ ~ <1( : \) ~, . (1;) ~I~ x O'CIl ~ \) ~ ~ ~ ~ \} ~ ~I\J I~ , UCIl#W ~I~ <'( \f) ~ I.\) ~ I ~ "J I" i <r0 3: I~ I~ \l;} ~~ . WHI-X It' . 1\0 , (}... "I ~. "I~ COCOUI- ~ ~ \\i ~ "0- ; W;:) " I I~ , >-lL."0 (() "l ~ I ""- : <rOOCll It! :.:: I I I ' I 0:: 0:: ,I I I 1 ...Jza.z ~ \) " wo 0 o H . I-O'Z - ~\,I; ~II; ~\ I ~~ ~\I~\ ~\ ~\ ~\ z\ ~\ I a\ I 1\ \ Il \ 1\ I %\ lL.<r-.oo I O...JIH Q \) ';::) t'l ~ ~ ; ;:).....1- \) I ~ ~ ~ ~ '\) '\\~ \) )-COO'U . "< .tD :\:\ \J ~~ \) ~ 0' ~ ~ ~ <;) '\) ~ <:;) ",,- I~ ~ I-<r ;:) t"( \JJ "<I~ "I \)\) IY) ,~ ~I ~10-: ~l ~ ~, I '\J I HI-#O:: 01 c.! I; ~ ~ ':J '" ':J , U I- 2 ~ I~ I \r; ~ " ~ OCll "- ~ HZ "- "- COO Z '] \) ~ 1"< U Q () I 'I I I ,I I I I I I :.<: \j\) I ...J <r lL. , 3: >- CIl lL. lL. W I- CIl ...J :r: 0 H 0 U :r: H I- 0 0 lL. 0 <I U CIl CIl Z \fl \fl ...J 0 W <I ...J <I . r<') " W ;:) ..... . 0 . ..... ..... a r<') N OJ " ..... " (!J W Z U CIl CIlH Z W WO:: <I ...J:'<: :.<: .J .J .JX(!J .JX<I ...J 3: ...JU U ...J .J .JOz .JOW ...J 0 CIl <IH H <I <r <ICOH <I CO CO <I . ...J (!J Z Z I-:r: :r: l- I- I- 0:: I- I-:r: ...JW z 0 0 CIlI- I- CIlo(l CIl CIl...J<I CIl...JU CIlU(!J <IU H H 0 H Z . Z Z . Z...JW Z...JH Z...JZ H 0 I- -l I- Z H: \fl: HCO H H;:)CO H;:)lL. H;:)H coo:: 0:: <I a. 0 '<t -.0 0:: I- a. a.lL. EO <I a. 0 U :r: w H 0(1 I- 0(1;:) o(IH 0(1 U 0(1 <I 0(1 <I ...J UW H O(!J U ..... I- :.<: u::.c:: U ;:) WH WO:: 00:: E WU lL. H;:) X 0' a. :r:...J ;:)...J :r: :r:o XI-lL. XI-I- XZ(!J (!J;:) O::Z H coO W 0' H CIl<I 0:: <I CIllL.O:: CIlZ CIlWlL.CIl CIlW CIl CIl<I ZCIl <I Z 0:: ..... 0:: H3: 1-3: H W HO HO::<IO:: HO::ZO:: H W H 03: E WX '- U ZW CIlW ZWI- ZU ZUO::W ZUOW ZO.J I-a. WO w Ull- . CIl 0::0 ZO 0:: a. I- 0:: O::ZI-> o::ZZ> a::W<I CIlE O...J 0 <I CIl 0' W ;:)H OH ;:))-;:) ;:): ;:)0'-0 ;:)0'-0 :::)w3: W;:) ~<i! Z co..... I- ..... 0 lL.CIl UCIl lL.1-(!J lL.'<t lL.U3:U lL.U3:U lL.CIlCll I-...J H Z ...JCIl W )- E <rE L: ...J W . I-W L: ;:) 1-# . . . . . , . 0 01- 0 I'") H ..... N r<') '<t \fl -.0 " OJ 0' ..... I-H U . > , City of Delray Beach Departmental Budget Transfer (1) Departmental Une Transfer (2) Date August 8, 1991 (3) Interfundllnterdepartmental Transfer (4) Batch Number 5Vj6S~ (5) Requested By: Environmental Services Department (6) ACCOUNT NUMBER (7) DESCRIPTION (8) TRANSFER OUT (9) TRANSFER IN 225-3161-541-61.41 S.E. 1st Street $ 18,228.21 225-3161-541-61-42 Lowson Drainage $ 12,051. 79 225-3162-541-61.44 Sidewalk (S.W. 4th $ 30,280.00 Avenue) (10) TOTAL $ 30,280.00 $ 30,280.00 JUSTIFICATION: Transfer is necessary to cover costs for the construction of S.W. 4th Avenue Sidewalk - Proiect No. 91-55. /1 Department Head I/JM"", ()?(/~!rl Asst City Manager . Budget Officer City Manager (11) Budget Revision Date (12) Control Number (13) Period (14) Count ORIGINAL-BUDGET CANARY-FILE PINK-DEPARTMENT I'll . , . Agenda Item No.: AGENDA REQUEST Request to be placed on: Date: 8/7/91 x Regular Agenda ____Special Agenda ____Workshop Agenda When: 8/5/91 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much)____ Authorize purchase of computer communication equipment for the Environmental Services Department - Water Treatment Plant and Maintenance Division. Cost = $13,811.40 PROJECT #91-07.1 Fundin source shall be from account # 442-5178-536-64.09 9.2.S 'J;J. I/o 7tc.; eOY11 I+t-Uo-Hle 1~5 ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES~DRAFT ATTACHED YES~ Recommendation: Recommend approval of purchase for the Environmental Services Department. &<< .Ae~ .-/7111 ~ Department Head Signature: Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: N/A city Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) N/A Budget Director ReVie~(reqUired on all items involving expenditure of funds): Funding available: ~NQ Funding alternatives (if applicable) Account No. & Description 442-5178-536-64.09 (COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE) Account Balance $57,790.46 City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: ~/NO {~~I Hold until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: Action: Approved/Disapproved MEMORANDUM ,4'~:,~ ta -L r ..~ L :...L-!--...... , ~_ /I~ 7/d,(7cu.L' /~ 5-J,~l,'--L 1..- -- ,~~_,.., TO: William H. Greenwood "'I. 2 5 ~1 Director of Environmental Services FROM: Richard Zuccaro, MIS Officer ~ DATE: July 22, 1991 SUBJECT: Communications Equipment Recommendation Attached is a copy of the communications equipment needed to extend the Environmental Services Local Area Network to the Water Treatment Plant and the Maintenance Building via fiber optics. \ I have included a recommended configuration and an alternative configuration from four different vendors. In all cases the recommended configuration turned out to be the most cost effective method. Microage quoted the lowest cost ($13,319) of the recommended configuration with an estimated 4 to 6 week delivery time for most of the components. If time is crucial you might want to consider TW Communications who came in with somewhat of a higher cost ($15,700) for the same configuration, however they quoted an estimated one week delivery time for all of the components. Included, are additional cost estimates for the necessary cables. Lowest cost for hardware is Microage: $13,319.00 Lowest cost for cables is TW Communications: $ 492.40 ---------- Total Cost $13,811.40 If you have any questions regarding this recommendation please call. cc: Robert A. Barcinski, Asst. City Manager/ Administrative Services Frank Deering, Assistant to the Director bg_tech_rc ,.". City Of Delray Beach. Florida Technical Recommendation To: William Greenwood Environmental Services Director From: Gregory A. Welch ~uU. Computer Systems Administrator Through: Richard Zuccaro ~ Management Informatlon Systems Officer Date: 07/22/91 Subject: Communications Equipment Necessary To Extend Environmental Services Local Area Network To Water Treatment Plant and Maintenance Building. PROJECT OVERVIEW Currently the Environmental Services Local Area Network ( LAN) is installed in the Main and Administration buildings. Fiber optic cables have been i nsta 11 ed to provide LAN ' access to the Water Treatment Plant and the Maintenance Building. Communications equipment and cables are the only items remaining to be ordered and installed. PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS Management Information Systems recommends IBM 8230 communications units for the Administration and Main Buil di ngs and IBM 8220 communications units for the Water Treatment Plant and Maintenance Building. The IBM 8230 Token-Ring network Controlled Access unit ;s an intelligent access concentrator which a 11 ows connection of from 0 to 80 workstations, via pluggable lobe attachment modules (LAMS), to a Token-Ring network. The 8230 is switchable between 16 and 4 megabits per second (MBPS) ~nd has a media access control (MAC) appearance on both the main and backup ri ngs. The 8230 is shipped with copper main ring modules and can be upgraded to fiber by plugging in the optical fiber converter module feature. The 8230 functions as a repeater in both directions. The 8230 will provide higher ring availability, via automatic reconfiguration, and better access control and asset management. The 8230, in most cases, will also allow for longer lobe lengths than the 8228 Multistation Acce 5S Unit. The 8230 provides i~proved systems management, user productivity, and is expandable. -1- Management Information Systems 407-243-7140 ,'" City Of Delray Beach Florida Technical Recommendation RECOMMENDED COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION Administration Building 001 -8230 Controlled Access Unit (1) 5501-8230 ICS Lobe Attachment Module (1) 5503-8230 Optical Fiber Converter Module (1) Main Building 001 -8230 Controlled Access Unit (1) 5501-8230 ICS Lobe Attachment Module (2) 5503-8230 Optical Fiber Converter Module (1) Maintenance Building 8220 Optical Fiber Converter (2) 8228 Multistation Access Unit (1) Note: We will move 8228 Multistation Access Unit currently installed at Admin1stratlon Building. Water Treatment Plant 8220 Optical Fiber Converter (2) Note: We will move the 8220 converters currently installed at Administration and Main Buildings. 8228 Multistation Access Unit (2) Note: We will move 8228 Multistation Access Units currently installed at Main Building. -2- Management Information Systems 407-243-7140 'I ,~ City Of Delray Beach Florida Technical Recommendation ALTERNATE COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION Administration Buildinq 8220 Optical Fiber Converter (2) Note: One converter already installed. 8228 Multistation Access Unit (1) Main Bui1dinq 8220 Optical Fiber Converter (2) Note: One converter already installed. 8228 Multistation Access Unit (1) \ Maintenance Buildinq 8220 Optical Fiber Converter (2) 8228 Multistation Access Unit (1) Water Treatment Plant 8220 Optical Fiber Converter (2) 8228 Multistation Access Unit (2) -3- Management Information Systems 407-243-7140 ,~ ,~ City Of Delray Beach Florida Verbal Vendor Quotation Date: 07/22/91 Vendor Name: MICROAGE Contact: ED GUNTHER Phone Number: (407) 683 - 5779 Recommended Configuration Item Description Quantity_ l}nit Cost __-IQ.ta 1 C~~~ 001-8230 CONTROLLED ACCESS UNIT 2 1935.00 3870.00 5501-8230 IeS LOBE ATTACH MODULE --> / rv': ',1,- Supports up to 20 work stations. 3 1322.25 3966.75 5503-8230 OPTICAL FIBER CONVERTER MODULE. \ 2 806.25 1612.50 Est. Delivery Time 4-6 weeks , IBM 8220 Fiber Optic Repeater 2 1935.00 3870.00 Est. Delivery Time 1 week Total ,Cost Of Items 13319.25 Alternate Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost IBM 8220 Fiber Optic Repeater 6 1935.00 11610.00 Est. Delivery Time 1 week IBM 8228 MAU 5 403.14 2015.70 Est. Delivery Time 1 week Total Cost Of Items 13625.70 - 1 - ,I ,~ City Of Delray Beach Florida Verbal Vendor Quotation Date: 07/22/91 Vendor Name: eOMPUTERLAND Contact: Steve Huntress Phone Number: (407) 683 - 2999 Recommended Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 001-8230 CONTROLLED ACCESS UNIT 2 2046.00 4092.00 5501-8230 ICS LOBE ATTACH MODULE Supports up to 20 work stations. 3 1398.10 4194.30 5503-8230 OPTICAL FIBER CONVERTER MODULE. 2 852.52 1705.04 Est. Delivery Time 4-6 weeks IBM 8220 Fiber Optic Repeater 2 2011. 00 4022.00 Est. Delivery Time 4-6 weeks Total .Cost Of Items 14013.34 Alternate Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost IBM 8220 Fiber Optic Repeater 6 '2011. 00 12066.00 Est. Delivery Time 4-6 weeks IBM 8228 MAU 5 411. 00 2055.00 Est. Delivery Time 4-6 weeks. Total Cost Of Items 14121.00 - 1 - ,'< City Of Delray Beach Florida Verbal Vendor Quotation- Date: 07/22/91 Vendor Name: CABER SYSTEMS Contact: Glen Anthony Phone Number: (800) 634 - 0682 Recommended Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 001-8230 CONTROLLED ACCESS UNIT 2 2117.00 4234.00 5501-8230 ICS LOBE ATTACH MODULE Supports up to 20 work stations. 3 1447.00 4341. 00 5503-8230 OPTICAL FIBER CONVERTER MODULE. \ 2 882.00 1764.00 Est. Delivery Time 4-6 weeks IBM 8220 Fiber Optic Repeater 2 2258.00 4516.00 Est. Del ivery Time 4-6 weeks Total Cost Of Items 14855.00 Alternate Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost IBM 8220 Fiber Optic Repeater 6 2258.00 13548.00 Est. Delivery Time 4-6 weeks IBM 8228 MAU 5 472.00 2360.00 Est. Delivery Time 2 days Total Cost Of Items 15908.00 - 1 - "! ,~ City Of Delray Beach Florida Verbal Vendor Quotation Date: 07/22/91 Vendor Name: TW COMMUNICATIONS Contact: BILL CAMPBELL Phone Number: (800) 638 - 5505 Recommended Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 001-8230 CONTROLLED ACCESS UNIT 2 2210.00' 4420.00 5501-8230 ICS LOBE ATTACH MODULE Supports up to 20 work stations. 3 1500.00 4500.00 5503-8230 OPTICAL FIBER CONVERTER MODULE. 2 900.00 1800.00 Est. Delivery Time 1 Week IBM 8220 Fiber Optic Repeater 2 2490.00 4980.00 Est. Delivery Time 1 Week Total .Cost Of Items 15700.00 Alternate Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost IBM 8220 Fiber Optic Repeater 6 2490.00 14940.00 Est. Delivery Time 1 Week IBM 8228 MAU 5 500.00 2500.00 Est. Delivery Time 1 Week Total Cost Of Items 17440.00 - 1 - ,,, City Of Delray Beach Florida Verbal Vendor Quotation Date: 07/22/91 Vendor Name: TW Communications Contact: Bill Campbell Phone Number: (800)638 - 5505 Infomation: Cabling specifications for recommended and alternate communications configuration for extension of Environmental Services LAN. . Cabling For Recommended Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost ST-TO-BNC (DUPLEX) 6' FOR IBM 8220 FIBER REPEATERS. 4 74.00 296.00 ST-TO-ST (DUPLEX) 6' FOR SIECOR CONNECTOR PANEL CENTER (CPC). 2 67.00 134.00 YELLOW CROSSOVER CABLE 8' 4 15.60 62.40 Total Cost Of Items 492.40 Cabling For Alternate Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost ST-TO-BNC (DUPLEX) 61 FOR IBM 8220 FIBER REPEATERS. 6 74.00 444.00 ST-TO-ST (DUPLEX) 61 FOR SIECOR CONNECTOR PANEL CENTER (CPC). 2 67.00 134.00 YELLOW CROSSOVER CABLE 81 4 15.60 62.40 Total Cost Of Items 640.40 Q919620DGW/MIS_QUOTES/QTXT - 1 - 'I .~ City Of Delray Beach Florida Verbal Vendor Quotation Date: 07/22/91 Vendor Name: Universal Cabling Systems Contact: Ron Dubeau Phone Number: (407) 659 - 6225 Infomation: Cabling specifications for recommended and alternate communications configuration for extension of Environmental Services LAN. Cabling For Recommended Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost ST-TO-BNC (DUPLEX) 61 4 104.00 416.00 FOR IBM 8220 FIBER REPEATERS. \ ST-TO-ST (DUPLEX) 61 2 40.00 80.00 FOR SIECOR CONNECTOR PANEL CENTER (CPC). YELLOW CROSSOVER CABLE 81 4 35.00 140.00 Total Cost Of Items 636.00 Cabling For Alternate Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost ST-TO-BNC (DUPLEX) 6' 6 104.00 624.00 FOR IBM 8220 FIBER REPEATERS. ST-TO-ST (DUPLEX) 61 2 40.00 80.00 FOR SIECOR CONNECTOR PANEL CENTER (CPC). YELLOW CROSSOVER CABLE 8' 4 35.00 140.00 Total Cost Of Items 844.00 Q919620AGW/MIS_QUOTES/QTXT - 1 - City Of Delray Beach Florida Verbal Vendor Quotation . Date: 07/22/91 Vendor Name: South Hills/Cord Cable Contact: Phone Number: (407) 994 - 4446 Information: Cabling specifications for recommended and alternate communications configuration for extension of Environmental Serv,ices LAN. Cabling For Recommended Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost ST-TO-BNC (DUPLEX) 61 FOR IBM 8220 FIBER REPEATERS. 4 116.90 467.60 ST-TO-ST (DUPLEX) 61 FOR SIECOR CONNECTOR PANEL CENTER (CPC). 2 116.90 233.80 YELLOW CROSSOVER CABLE 81 4 22.50 90.00 Total Cost Of Items 791.40 Cabling For Alternate Configuration Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost ST-TO-BNC (DUPLEX) 61 FOR IBM 8220 FIBER REPEATERS. 6 116.90 701.40 ST-TO-ST (DUPLEX) 6' FOR SIECOR CONNECTOR PANEL CENTER (CPC).' 2 116.90 233.80 YELLOW CROSSOVER CABLE 8' 4 22.50 90.00 Total Cost Of Items 1025.20 Q919620BGW/MIS_QUOTES/QTXT - 1 - q,U . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAG E R{lr'1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 9 R - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 ACCEPTANCE OF REPORT OF APPEALABLE LAND USE ITEMS DATE: August 7, 1991 This item is before you for acceptance of the report of decisions made by the various development related boards during the period July 22nd through August 12th. The following actions were considered during this reporting period: Planning and Zoning Board: -Denied (4-0 vote), the preliminary plat for the Griffin Gate Subdivision. -Reaffirmed its previous position of approval (5-0 vote) of the LDR text amendment (Ordinance No. 49-91) to allow commercial activities on publicly owned lands in the Community Facilities (CF) Zone District. Site Plan Review and Appearance Board: -Approved the architectural elevations plan associated with a covered parking structure at The Arbors Building. -Approved changes to the landscape plan for Fiduciary Research, Inc. Approved the site plan associated with the expansion of the Delray Lincoln Mercury Dealership and concurrently waived the requirement for sidewalks along Dixie and Federal Highways. Action was tabled on the landscape plan. The Historic Preservation Board did not hold a regular business meeting during this reporting period. A detailed staff report is attached as backup material for this item. .iN ll\ tt\-) C I T Y COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION VID HARDEN, CITY MANAGER I~~'D19&kOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING I~p.^ ~ FROM: JASMIN ALLEN, PLANNER I SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 REPORT OF APPEALABLE LAND USE ITEMS JULY 23, 1991 THRU AUGUST 12, 1991 ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of review of appealable actions which were made by various Boards during the period of July 23, 1991, through August 12, 1991. BACKGROUND: This is the method of informing the City Commission of land use actions, taken by designated Boards, which may be appealed by the Ci ty Commission. After this meeting, the appeal period shall expire (unless the 10 day minimum has not occurred). Section 2.4.7(E) of the LDRs applies. In summary, it provides that the City Commission hears appeals of actions taken by an approving Board. It also provides that the City Commission may file an appeal. To do so: 1. The item must be raised by a City Commission member. 2. By motion, an action must be taken to place the item on the next meeting of the Commission as an appealed item. City Commission Documentation Report of Appealable Land Use Items July 23, thru August 12, 1991 Page 2 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING OF JULY 29, 1991 1- Denied by a vote of 4 to 0, the Preliminary Plat for the Griffin Gate Subdivision. Denial of the subdivision request was based on the failure to make positive findings with respect to compatibility of land use. The subject site is located on the east side of Swinton Avenue, south of 4th Street. The proposal is to create 6 individual lots, which may accommodate duplex units or single family units. An appeal has been filed by the petitioner. 2. The Board reaffirmed its previous position of approval of the LDR text amendment - Ordinance 49-91, Conditional Uses to allow commercial activities on publicly owned lands in the Community Facilities (CF) Zone District (Vote 5 to 0). No other appealable items. SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPEARANCE BOARD MEETING OF JULY 31, 1991 1- Approved the architectural elevations plan associated with a covered parking structure at The Arbors Building, located at 1690 S. Congress Avenue (Vote 7 to 0). 2. Approved changes to the landscape plan for Fiduciary Research, Inc. located at 403 S.E. 1st Street (Vote 7 to 0). 3. Approved the site plan associated with the expansion of the Delray Lincoln Mercury Dealership located on South Federal Highway. The proposal involves the construction of a two-story service building, a one story showroom and extension of the existing customer write-up canopy. Concurrently, the Board waived the requirement for sidewalks along Dixie and Federal Highways. The Board tabled action on the landscape plan pending resolve of the perimeter landscape treatment along Federal Highway. Also, upon consideration of the landscape plan, the Board will make recommendations to the City Commission relating to relief from several landscape requirements, namely, relief from number of required internal trees and perimeter trees; a reduction'to the width of the perimeter landscape strip along Federal Highway; and reduction of five internal landscape islands. No other appealable items. City Commission Documentation Report of Appealable Land Use Items July 23, thru August 12, 1991 Page 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD: No Regular Business meeting was held during this period RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, receive and file this report. Attachments: Location Maps JA/#58/CCAU.TXT >1.1' I . ~/ I GRIFFIN GATE aUBDIVI810N B~ I 1~8t:j ~ - IT. LL j ai I Ii .. !--- ~LL Iii LW. 4111 n ~ ~ ......U Ii .. LL 11M I ~ . LI. 11M ..: LW. 11M I1BII' r ~ u l.j LW. 7I"H If. I "". .. ~ ~ . --.. [0 - :~ I I Ii ~ -:. ( j ~ J :I tJ- .;;; THE ARBORS BUILDING - / n . 111 111 If J II I L . UHf ON IOULE\'ARO I ." .. LJ 0. ~ :g;;; - I : IT II /r : 1111 &1IMI ~ l, 'IMD '~~.~ r 4 ~"IIUIl' ~ ~~ DIIJlAY ~ · ~,.,. ~ ICMM L..I . ..... ... Ul)[) ".:=. = : I If ~ '/) ~ ~ t l{.. ~ ... :- : ., ,........ __ KIM' ... ~ ... r lilT"" -~ ~ : ~ _ .. - ~:::o-" . .. ~~ ; ~ .=-~. : ....::: V ~rt I J....... I ,..-.-.... ...... .,.. TlIIACII ... . . . . . ., AI ~ ..., .... . . . . . ~ ............ .... . ...... ,-' I . :::.:-:.:.:-: :: :.:.:-:-:-:. ~ H"-' ......... . ...... I ...--. -.- r,.--- _ I ................... l)J.......~... . ...... J . . . . . . (~...... . . . . _ ---....- II . . . . .MIM,......~ . ...... I .. ................ ....... . ~ ................. . ...... ~ I ')............ . :::::::::::::::::: . ":::::: )r 'r ..................... ........ ........... ..................... . ...... L___' ..................... . ...... , ~I-- -- .:::::. I T -:::. I ~ .. . .. . t::: po..- - ~ - ~ I - - ( 111~-'V = ." 1-- _ \ 'H ~ \1 ~ fl.-- 71_-:-. \-- \ = rrlT~ = I- ~ ..l I I I ~ = - I_ I "'" .... 1._ J ~ ---- t~ i- ~'ll.J1- _ CtQ2~~~ - j ~ ------ -- ~ DUM OMS ~ - ~ ...... &A1II& WI"' I I (\ ! .~ .~ -lDD [FIDUCIARY RESEARCH INC.[t=jtj I 11 1ST I /- I I ! i l iii Z ~ k J I AVE. ]QIl 7 14 I I e 15 9 16 W / ~ 10 1 117 ~ l' .... f - I 11 18 0 I Z i ~ J ! UJ w! > La.I en La.I a:: C ~ 0 ~ a:: ...J 1ft ~ 0:: I . lo.I I u . en I UJ . Li- ST. I I 'mo! ~ c j ~ i Z H.>l . ' . ~IDELRA'( LINCOLN MERCURY 0lJ) HARBOR _. L 'I ~',MAlL PlAZA . UNtON BOULEVARD J D.B.O. Aau:5 0lJ) HARBOR OfFlCE AND 8A . - : OlD HAR ornCE BANK DEl.RA Y INDUSTRJAL PARK rAClUTY U - ------ saUD WASTE AUlHORITY - DELRAY MAZDA - .. ~ BlJRNS OLDSWOBILE MILLER DElRAY PARK WfTSU81SHI -- cJ . ED WORSE CADIllAC &..I B Q DEl.RA Y ------- PLAZA N -I ,~ . . August 13, 1991 RE: Conditions of approval for the Final Plat for Rebecca's Landing~ Option C: The City Commission WO~ltl~e the re-plat as submitted and currently grant '.7ariangos to accommodate the following: moo'biCA-71on -J.o 'thE... .5'7'lHUJ17~ A. The placement of a dolphin upon the common lot line between new Lots 1 and 2. B. The placement of a finger pier on Lot 2 in such a manner as to be as close as 15 feet from the common property line between new Lot 1 and 2. C. The placement of a finger pier on Lot 1 in such a manner as to be as close as 15 feet from the common property line between new Lot 1 and 2. In addition, the following conditions shall apply to said approval: 1- The most westerly dolphin on new Lot 2 shall not be closer than 40 feet from the westerly property line of new Lot 2, when and if installed. After the installation of this most westerly dolphin no boats may be moored closer than 40 feet from the westerly property line of new Lot 2. No finger pier may be installed west of this westerly dolphin. Prior to construction of the above westerly dolphin or finger pier adjacent to new Lot 2, all boats docked parallel to the north property line of new Lot 2 shall be docked with their bow facing westerly, and at least 15 feet from the west property line of new Lot 2. 2. Nothing needs to be done with regard to moving the existing finger pier on new Lot 1, until such time as a permit application is filed for a finger pier on new Lot 2. 3 . That the existing finger pier adjacent to new lot 1 may be relocated in conformity with the above-referenced variances, at any time, irrespective of whether or not any application has been filed for a finger pier or dolphin pertaining to new Lot 2. . . ~~ uxi::/J I M E M 0 RAN DUM rm~ ~ TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER~ SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 9.B - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 APPROVAL OF WAIVERS/FINAL PLAT RECONSIDERATION - REBECCA'S LANDING DATE: AUGUST 9, 1991 This item was previously discussed at both the January 29th and June 25th regular meetings. It involves approval of a final plat for a boundary line adjustment to the plat for Rebecca's Landing, a waiver of the sidewalk installation requirement, and the issue of what dock or pier facilities are allowed for the new lot #2. As an impasse existed between the affected parties with respect to the finger pier locations, the City Commission, on June 25, 1991, remanded the matter to the Planning Director for arbitration. As a result of these efforts, an agreement between the parties has been reached, the details of which are outlined in the accompanying documentation. Recommend approval of two separate actions, as follows: (1) Approve modifications to the standards for location of finger piers and dolphins as follows: ( a) the placement of a dolphin upon the common lot line between new Lots 1 and 2; (b) the placement of a finger pier on Lot 2 in such a manner as to be as close as 15 ft. from the common property line; (c) the placement of a finger pier on Lot 1 in such a manner as to be as close as 15 ft. from the common property line. In addition, conditions of such approval shall be: (1 ) that the westerly dolphin on Lot 2 shall not be closer than forty feet (40' ) from the westerly property boundary; (2 ) that nothing needs to be done with regard to moving the existing finger pier until such time as a permit application is filed for a finger pier on Lot 2; (3 ) that the existing finger pier may be relocated in conformance with the variances irrespective of any other actions. (2 ) Approve the final plat for Rebecca's Landing with the condition that the following be added as a note to the plat: "NOTE: Modifications to the standards for location of finger piers and dolphins were granted by the Delray Beach City Commission on August 13, 1991. The placement or relocation of finger piers and dolphins associated with Lot 1 or Lot 2 shall be in compliance with that action." '-1( tJv} C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER ~KOV ~~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 REBECCA'S LANDING WAIVERS PRECEDENT TO FINAL PLAT AND FINAL PLAT RECONSIDERATION ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of grantinq waivers pertaininq to finqer pier locations and then reconsideration and approval of the Final Plat for Rebecca's Landing. The project is a configuration of two lots. It is located off Del-Harbour Drive. BACKGROUND: This item was before the City Commission for final plat consideration on January 29, 1991, at which time conditional approval was granted. On June 25th, the item was again before the City Commission. Roger Saberson, representing the applicant claimed that an impasse existed between his client and neighboring property owners. After hearing the item, the City Commission directed that the parties met with David Kovacs, in an arbitration capacity, in an attempt to resolve the matter. A meeting was held among all affected parties including the Chief Building Official and the City Engineer. A set of alternatives was presented by Mr. Kovacs. The attorneys for the parties reached an agreement, the essence of which is contained in Mr. Purdo's letter of August 6th (copy attached). PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION The Planning and Zoning Board does not review petitions for finger pier and dolphin locations. The Board had previously recommended approval of the final plat. City Commission Documentation Rebecca's Landing Waivers Precedent to Final Plat and Plat Reconsideration Page 2 MODIFICATION OF STANDARDS: Pursuant to Section 7.9.4(A), upon recommendation of the City Engineer, the City Commission may grant a modification to standards required for the placement and location of finger piers and dolphins. The City Engineer supports the compromise presented in this documentation. The actual modifications are contained in the recommended action. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Two Separate Actions: By motion, approved modifications to the standards for location of finger piers and dolphins as follows: (a) the placement of a dolphin upon the common lot line between new Lots 1 and 2; (b) the placement of a finger pier on Lot 2 in such a manner as to be as close as 15' from the common property line; (c) the placement of a finger pier on Lot 1 in such a manner as to be as close as 15' from the common property line. In addition, conditions of such approval shall be: ( 1 ) that the westerly dolphin on Lot 2 shall not be closer than forth feet (40' ) from the westerly property boundary; ( 2 ) that nothing needs to be done with regard to moving the existing finger pier until such time as a permit application is filed for a finger pier on Lot 2; (3) that the existing finger pier may be relocated in conformance with the variances irrespective of any other actions. By motion, approve the final plat for Rebecca's Landing with the condition that the following be added as a note to the plat: "NOTE: Modifications to the standards for location of finger piers and dolphins were granted by the Delray Beach City Commission on August 13, 1991. The placement or relocation of finger piers and dolphins associated with Lot 1 or Lot 2 shall be in compliance with that action." Attachments: * Kovacs letter of July 12, 1991, setting for options * Purdo letter of August 6th _I'll LAW OFFICES MACMILLAN, STANLEY & PURDO MACMILLAN BUILDING 29 NORTHEAST FOURTH AVENUE P. 0, BOX 820 DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33447-0820 NEIL E. MACMILLAN TELEPHONE CAROL MACMILLAN STANLEY (407) 276-6363 THOMAS G. PURDO (407) 272-5757 August 6, 1991 (407) 737-6600 Mr. David Kovacs City of Delray Beach 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 RE: Final Plat for Rebecca's Landing Dear David: The undersigned represents Harbour Villas Condominium Association, Inc. , which is the governing body for Harbour Villas Condominium Association. The Board of Directors for Harbour Villas Condominium Association, Inc. has authorized me to accept the following proposal with regards to the dock, pier and dolphin locations that could be constructed on Lot 2 of the proposed re-plat of Rebecca's Landing. My clients agree to option "C" as set forth by you in your letter of July 12, 1991 and more specifically refined and agreed to by Mr. Saberson as follows: Option C: The City Commission would approve the re-plat as submitted and currently grant variances to accommodate the following: A. The placement of a dolphin upon the common lot line between new Lots 1 and 2. B. The placement of a finger pier on Lot 2 in such a manner as to be as close as 15 feet from the common property line between new Lot 1 and 2. C. The placement of a finger pier on Lot 1 in such a manner as to be as close as 15 feet from the common property line between new Lot 1 and 2. In addition, the following conditions shall apply to said approval: 1. The most westerly dolphin on new Lot 2 shall not '" August 6, 1991 Page Two RE: Final Plat for Rebecca's Landing be closer than 40 feet from the westerly property line of new Lot 2, when and if installed. Furthermore, no boats may be moored west of the above westerly dolphin. 2. Nothing needs to be done with regard to moving the existing finger pier on new Lot 1, until such time as a permit application is filed for a finger pier on new Lot 2. 3 . That the existing finger pier adjacent to new lot 1 may be relocated in conformity with the above-referenced variances, at any time, irrespective of whether or not any application has been filed for a finger pier or dolphin pertaining to new Lot 2. Given the above agreement, Harbour Villas Condominium Association, Inc. , shall not oppose the location of the installation of a dolphin on new Lot 2 as long as it is installed pursuant to the above agreement and consents to any variances as required above for the new Lot 2 and new Lot 1. I am requesting that the following language be added to the plat: The construction of any docks, piers or dolphins and the mooring and locations of any boats on new Lot 2 shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain agreement between the Harbour Villas Association and Mrs. Rebecca Berry filed as part of the City Commission minutes and plat approval. If this does not set forth our agreement, please advise me. TGP/dws cc: Roger Saberson (via fax & mail) Mayor Thomas Lynch City Manager Robert Corbett . [IT' DF DELIA' BEA[H 100 NW. 1st AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 407:243-700Cl July 12, 1991 Roger Saberson, Esq. 70 S.E. 4th Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33483 and Thomas Purdo, Esq. 29 N.E. 4th Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33483 Re: Rebecca's Landinq Dockaqe This letter sets forth the options derived during our meeting of Wednesday, July 11, 1991, at which time we discussed the creation (or continuation) of a nonconforming situation with respect to . the finger pier between Lots 16 and 17 (current designations) and the effect of resubdivision into Lots 1 and 2 (proposed designations). With respect to the current situation, the City Commission may act either to approve the replat and acknowledge the nonconforming status of the existing finger pieri or, it may deny the replat on the basis that it creates a nonconforming situation wherein encroachment of existing structures upon the existing lot line creat~a Unity of Ttitle situation. In the following, the term "lot boundary" means the extension of property lines into the waterway in a manner perpendicular to the dock. OPTION "A": The City Commission would approved the replat as submitted with no specific action regarding future dockage. However, the following information would be entered into our Land Use Management System (computer) File and would be called up whenever a permit application was received. Under present codes, the minimum distance a dolphin can be located from the western boundary of Lot 2 is 25'. Similarly, 25' must be maintained from the eastern boundary of Lot 2. Therefore, a finger pier cannot be constructed and accommodate two boats, each properly secured. In that a finger pier is normally to be for the purpose of docking two boats, it is the present position of the City Engineer that a permit for a finger pier would not be granted. THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS . . To: Roger Saberson, Esq. Thomas Purdo, Esq. Re: Rebecca's Landing Dockage July 12, 1991 Page 2 Additional information and special conditions could be considered and imposed if and when a permit application is submitted. It is also noted that it is likely that Harbour ',.I,\\ccs Mqe Condominiums will oppose the granting of such a permit based upon the intent of Section 7.9.1 not being complied with. OPTION "B": The City Commission would approved the replat as submitted with no specific action regarding future dockage. However, the following information would be entered into our Land Use Management System (computer) File and would be called up whenever a permit application was received. In order to construct a finger pier on Lot 2 it will be necessary to obtain a variance in order to locate a dolphin within 25' of the easterly boundary of Lot 2. Assuming that a variance is not pursued to locate the finger pier closer than 25' to the easterly boundary, the dolphin variance, if approved, should be conditioned upon the westerly dolphin being no closer than thirty feet (30' ) from the westerly boundary of Lot 2. If a variance is granted to locate the finger pier closer to the easterly boundary, then a one foot for one foot distance (in addition to the minimum 30' ) should be extended easterly from the west property boundary to the west dolphin. A determination of whether or not to grant any requested variance will rest with the City Commission which sits at the time of permit application. It is anticipated that Harbour Bdqe,~ndominiums will oppose the granting of such a permit based upon the intent of Section 7.9.1 not being complied with. ~ -\h'\ C\) OPTION "C": The City Commission would approved the replat as submitted and concurrently grant variances to accommodate the following: (a) the placement of a dolphin upon the common lot line between new Lots 1 and 2; (b) the placement of a finger pier on Lot 2 in such a manner as to be as close as 15' from the common I " property lineif"-\,~~ 'N:,h l ~'2..- (c) the placement of a finger pier on Lot 1 in such a manner as to be as close as 15' from the common property line. " .. . . . To: Roger Saberson, Esq. Thomas Purdo, Esq. Re: Rebecca's Landing Dockage July 12, 1991 Page 3 In addition, conditions of such approval shall be: ( 1) that the westerly dolphin on Lot 2 shall not be closer than forty feet (40' ) from the westerly property boundary<f\ c.I..,\...c;t ~ (2) that nothing needs to be done with regard to moving the existing finger pier until such time as a permit application is filed for a finger pier on Lot 2; (3) that the existing finger pier may be relocated in conformance Wi~ t::_ variances( ~~/--any- o~etionSJ'\i.w-e,~ ~ del \- . 't~.. ( \,...<;\"-I..>..t-l \-\\( c......( , ." / V 0\., U't t \ ') \ \\L ___ _ ~ e..\""Cc'C"._ .......- - (4 ) that in the event -any pri vate agreements,~hich may have been entered into with respect to the compromise represented by this Option "c" are not adhered to by Harbour'~ Condominiums, the options identified as "A" and/ r."B" may be pursued by the owner of Lot 2. REQUEST: '- tll\ (,t-; I request that each of you review the above options with your clients and let me know which, if any, are acceptable. If you desire any language changes, feel free to suggest them. Jeff Kurtz will be the final drafter of any language which goes before the City Commission. I request you timely response to this matter so that the final plat can be acted upon. gc0>tj~u~ c: Jeff Kurtz, City Attorney Mark Gabriel, City Engineer David Harden, City Manager DJK/#82/DOCKS ,j,," F ,"'" . ..Ie CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: ALISON MACGREGOR-HARTY, CITY CLERK FROM: PAT CAYC~HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER THRU: STAN WEEDON, PLANNER III~ SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 APPEAL OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR DEMOLITION OF A GARAGE LOCATED AT 36 PALM SQUARE BACKGROUND On Monday, August 12, 1991, the Chief Building Official inspected the interior of the garage located at 36 Palm Square and discovered deterioration which was not visible from the exterior. It is Mr. Sanzone's opinion that the building is beyond practical attempt to repair or restore it for use as a workshop or storage room and should be condemned. I have contacted the five HPB members who voted on this item and they concur that in view of Mr. Sanzone's inspection, the garage should be demolished. RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to the Chief Building Official's memo ~~August 12, 1991 (attached), the Historic Preservation Boad withdraws its denial and supports the applicant's request to demolish the garage. ~ ~ S--O . MEMORANDUM ---------- TO: DAVID HARDEN, CITY MANAGER THRU: LULA BUTLER, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT~ FROM: JEROME SANZONE, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICI~, SUBJECT: GARAGE LOCATED AT 36 PALM SO DATE: AUGUST 12, 1991 ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION Demolition of the garage located at 36 Palm Square. Appeal of the Historic Preservation Board action to deny demolition of the garage. BACKGROUND On August 9, 1991 I performed an inspection at which time I could not see the interior of this building. On August 12, 1991 Mr. Richard Raab met with me and I completed the inspection of the interior. The roof is totally decayed and is unable to hold its own weight. The walls are being held up by the stucco. It would be more economical to demolish this garage than it would be to attempt to rebuild it. This building would and should be condemned. It is structural damage by termites and incipient rot. RECOMMENDATION I recommend demolition of this building. It will be too costly to rebuild. The building would not survive remodeling or renovating without collapsing. JS/dc cc: Pat Cayce, Historic Preservation~-Plann';r>". stan Weedon, Planner III Disk:JS#4 B:palm.Sq . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER trt/l SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # qc..., - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 APPEAL OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD DECISIONj36 PALM SQUARE DATE: August 7 I 1991 This item is before you to consider an appeal of a Historic Preservation Board decision denying a request to demolish a free-standing garage located at 36 Palm Square. The House and garage were constructed in 1937 and are located in the Marina Historic District. Together they constitute one of the few remaining examples of early residences and garages built at the same time and designed to compliment one another. The Historic Preservation Board at their July 17th meeting denied the request based upon positive findings on three of five of the guidelines used in evaluating applications for a certificate of appropriateness for demolition of historic structures or appurtenances, pursuant to Section 4.5. 1 (F)(l) of the Land Development Regulations. The applicant is appealing this decision based upon the following: -The garage is dilapidated and is not worthy of repairs. -The garage is too small to accommodate the owner's full size car. -The proposed 20' x 24' screened porch addition would be less that two feet (approximately 20 inches) from the existing garage, thus completely shielding any breezes. -The owners are accustomed to taking most meals and living on their former home's screened porch and choose to continue their lifestyle. -They prefer a view of lush tropical landscaping rather than the side of a dilapidated garage. In response to those items address by the applicant, staff has found that: A. The garage has not been condemned and appears in good repair. B. While the building is not large enough to serve as a garage, except for a sports car, the Historic Preservation Board would approve the addition of windows or doors, providing the cost does not exceed 10% of the replacement cost of the building. C. There is sufficient room in the rear yard to construct a reconfigured 280 square foot screened porch without demolishing the garage. D. Reconfiguration of the garage would provide additional space between the porch and the garage and would provide for breeze III' AGENDA REPORT Meeting of 8/13/91 circulation. E. Lush tropical landscaping can be provided with plantings on the north and west property lines and by trellised vines reaching over the garage wall on the south. The Director of Planning and Zoning recommends that the decision of the Historic Preservation Board be upheld and the appeal denied based upon the Board's findings pursuant to Section 4.5.1 (F)(l) of the Land Development Regulations. - 2 - CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: ALISON MACGREGOR-HARTY, CITY CLERK FROM: PAT CAYCE~ISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER THRU: STAN WEEDON, PLANNER II~ SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 APPEAL OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR DEMOLITION OF A GARAGE LOCATED AT 36 PALM SQUARE ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the Clty Commisslon is that of reversal of an Historic Preservation Board action which denied the demolition of a free standing garage in the Marina Historic District. The appeal has been filed by the applicant, Richard Raab, President of MTR Development Company, acting as the owner's authorized agent. BACKGROUND Constructed in 1937, the house and garage located at 36 Palm Square are both contributing buildings (built before 1943) in the Marina Historic District. Together they constitute one of the few remaining examples of early residence and garage built at the same time and designed to compliment each other. The construction of a house and detached garage in matching architectural style on small suburban lots began in the 1920's. Previous to this, existing out-buildings, barns or carriage houses were utilized for car storage. In the prosperity of the 1920's there was a strong demand for owner occupied, single family, middle class housing. These small houses were designed to be aesthetically pleasing, economical and practical to live in, and integrated to the surrounding neighborhood. with the increasing importance of the automobile to suburban family life the small but matching one car garage came into fashion as both a function and a form. During the post WW II building boom of the late 1940' s garages became an integral, attached part of the house, either enclosed, or in mild climates as an attached open carport. Page Two Historically we are looking at roughly a 25 year window when attractive small suburban houses were built with matching detached garages. Though many of these were built in Delray Beach, very few of the garages remain. Thirty six Palm Square represents an historically accurate example of this period in American architecture. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CONSIDERATION The Historic Preservation Board considered this item at its meeting of July 17, 1991. The Board uses as its criteria for demolition Section 4.5.1 (F)(l) of the Land Development Regulations (attached) . With this for a guide the following conclusions were made: Pursuant to 4.5.1 (F)(l): ( a) No, the garage would not reasonably fulfill the criteria for listing on the National Register. (b) Yes, it would be difficult and expensive to reproduce the garage. (c) Yes, there is only one other in the Marina Historic District. (d) Yes, as described above, the small house and matching single car garage relate to a definite period of the built history in Delray Beach. (e) No, there are no plans to utilize the site of the garage. The garage does not conform to the current setback requirements and therefor nothing could be built on the site without variances for setback relief. The vote was 5-0, Wayne Campbell and Spencer Pompey absent. . BASIS OF APPEAL The appeal letter (copy attached) cites the following reasons as a basis for the appeal: l. The dilapidated 10' x 20', 63 year old garage is not worthy of costly repairs. 2. It is too small for the owner's full size car. 3. The proposed 20' x 24' screened porch addition would be less than 2 ft. (20 inches) from the existing garage, thus completely shielding any breezes the owners hope to enjoy. Page Three 4. The owners are accustomed to taking most meals and living on their former home's screened porch and choose to continue their existing lifestyle. 5. They prefer a view of lush tropical landscaping rather than the side of a dilapidated garage. In response to these items the following comments are offered: 1. The garage has not been condemned and appears in good repair. 2. The building is not large enough to serve as a garage except for a sports car. However the HPB would approve the addition of windows or doors, providing the cost does not exceed 10% of the replacement cost of the building so that the structure can be used for a workshop or storage. 3. There is sufficient room in the rear yard to construct a reconfigured 280 square foot screened porch in the rear yard without demolishing the garage. 4. By reconfiguration, additional space between porch and garage would allow the breezes to circulate. 5 Lush tropical landscaping could be provided with plantings on the north and west property lines and by trellised vines reaching over the garage wall on the south. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Overrule the HPB's action and permit the demolition of the existing garage, or 2. Determine that the HPB's action was appropriate given the findings made pursuant to Section 4.5.1 (F)(1) of the LDR's and deny the appeal. 3. Remand the item to the HPB for reconsideration of the previous action. RECOMMENDED ACTION Based upon the HPB's findings pursuant to Section 4.5.1 (F)(1) of the Land Development Regulations, deny the appeal. Attachments: Section 4.5.1 (F)(1) of the LDR's Appeal letter dated August 1, 1991 f !J~ / (F ) ( 1 ) The Historic Preservation Board upon a request for demolition by a property owner, shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a certificate of appropriateness for demolition of designated historic sites, historic interiors, or buildings, structures, or appurtenances within designated historic districts; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill criteria for designation for listing on the national register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. ( d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. (2) No decision of the Board shall result in undue economic hardship f or the property owner. The Board shall have authority to determine the existence of such hardship in accordance with the definition of undue economic hardship found in Subsection (H). ( 3) The Board's refusal to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness requested by a property owner for the purpose of demolition will be supported by a written statement describing the public interest that the Board seeks to preserve. ( 4 ) The Board may grant a certificate of appropriateness as requested by a property owner, for demolition which may provide for a delayed effective date. The effective date of the certificate will be determined by the Board based on the relative significance of the structure and the probable time 4.5.7 ; ~ . August 1, 1991 50 PALM SQUARE, DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA 33444 -'.' , , Richard L. RJdb President (305) 272 - 7280 Mr. David Harden, City Manager City Hall - 100 NW 1st Ave. RE: Appeal Historic Preservation Delray Beach, FL 33444 Board's denial of garage demolition on July 17, 1991 Dear David: The owner of 36 Palm Square, Georgina Barnard, has requested that I appeal the enclosed demolition denial for the following reasons: 1 - The delapidated 10' X 20' , 63 year old garage is not worthy of costly repairs. 2 - It is too small for the owner's full size car. 3 - The proposed 20' X 24' screened porch addition would be less than 2 ft. (20 inches) from the existing garage, thus completely shielding any breezes the owners hope to enjoy. 4 - The owners are accustomed to taking most meals and living on their former home's screened porch and choose to continue their existing'lifestyle. S - They prefer a view of lush tropical landscaping rather than the side of delapidated garage. I have spoken to Lula Butler regarding the garage and she has agreed to have a building official investigate for possible condemnation prior to the Ci~y Commission's action on this appeal. If the Commission grants the garage demolition, the owner will appl~ for a building permit and proceed with construction as soon as possible, therefore, we would appreciate being placed on an early workshop agenda at which time I will represent the owner. Please notify me of the workshop date. cc: Georgina Barnard Lu1a Butler Patricia Cayce encl: Site plan Historic Board record of action ---~V~d~-J:r- ) J <:f --::---.-....----.---.-.------ I -- -----..: - ~ _ . ,0 ! z! !1 { . (! lj ~ J I 000%0 l' -I' Q.' O!I I , I \1J , I !.i Z .z I i ,)-<' A , I' ~~ '" o I I "'J J - , ii, ~'~ Q. ~ ~ I ~~ J 8! jj ~'~ UJ o I < ~ ~~ ~ ~ ! ~. ~___J,,~ ~~ ~ o ~T I I I , L--- ~ 1-~ (ITY DF DELIAY BEAEH 100 N.W. 1st AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 407/243- /00'-1 July 18, 1991 Mr. Richard Raab 50 Palm Square Delray Beach, FL 33483 Dear Mr. Raab, The following is a record of the action taken on your request for a Certificate of Appropriateness. COA 8-154 36 PALM SQUARE GEORGINA BARNARD, O\vNER PRESENTED BY RICHARD RAAB, AUTHORIZED AGENT Requested: Demolition of detached garage Demolition of attached utility room Construction of screened porch on rear of house At its regular meeting on July 17, 1991 the Historic Preservation Board took the following action on COA 8-154: 1. Denied approval to demolish the detached garage located on the south west corner of the lot. The vote was 5-0. The decision was based on several factors: A. The garage is a contributing structure which was built when the house was constructed in 1937. It is one of the few remaining examples of house and garage built to complement each other, which still remains in the Marina historic district. B. The building has not been condemned. C. There is sufficient room in the rear yard to build the proposed screen porch addition without demolishing the garage. D. The garage does not meet the current setback requirements and if it is demolished nothing could be built on the site without a variance being granted for setback relief. THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS Richard Raab July 18, 1991 Page 2 2. Approved the demolition of the attached utility room. The utility room was a later addition to the original structure. Approved the construction of the screened porch. The vote was 5-0. If the owners want to proceed with the porch construction withou~ demolition of the garage you may apply for the building permits at your convenience. If the owners wish to appeal the Historic Preservation Board's decision they may do so by applying to the City Commission on or before 30 days from the date of the Board's action. Please phone me 243-7284 if you have any questions or if I can be of any assistance. Sincerely, f1r~ Patricia Cayce Historic Preservation Planner c: Georgina Barnard, Owner , .f. -'~ .'-.' ~, - -~ - . .:. '. ,." <;", '/ ,r....-....,., " '" C- 'tl:- ,..~ - I _ I - ~ ., t- ~,~:~~l~'f~', .",.-.. -),'-'. .: :. ~.., ,- ~ ",:,' ~.. . I ~..' ~ oJ. ~ ".."_ ,..... . l!'.'~ . ., ....:.~. >-.,,: - ..... 'Jt!, " ..... '-:! . ,.. - . .",.~ ~.... r ,". ~-.. ,:-:" ,:.... . f'W'. .~_ .. . .. .. .- - " . '- " - I .' . _, ..:"._ .' ...,... ~.:..." - . "I '.- ~- " " ,. .: .' <t"~l"'"",''''''' .. ". ,..... . 3&. .,*,1.., Si- II~.., N",j ,~1" '\~~\', l1,. \ \\ \ , . ,., : ~" ,.,,,, Sf. - /1.".6 e . ,,;U . .' '1 ~ ., " ., - t~ ... . , ,.. , . . .. : . '. . ~ . ;,.:,. p' . . ~ . .... ..... . \ l .. (,-" ., ~ 1 ': "~ d . ... , ,f ...r, A ~ . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER p;Vl SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 90 - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 APPEAL OF PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD DECISION/GRIFFIN GATE DATE: August 7 , 1991 This item is before you to consider an appeal of a Planning and Zoning Board decision denying a preliminary plat for the proposed Griffin Gate subdivision located on the southeast corner of Swinton Avenue and S.E. 4th Street. The development proposal for this site involves the subdividing of two parcels, totalling 1.5 acres in land area, into six separate lots under RM (Multi- Family Residential) District zoning. The Planning and Zoning Board at their July 29th meeting denied the preliminary plat (4-0 vote) , based upon a finding that there would be a resulting incompatibility of land use between single family detached and/or duplex units and the existing land uses of f commercial/industrial to the east, the Drug Abuse Foundation to the west, multiple family to the south, and being located along a County collector roadway. A detailed staff report is attached as backup material for this item. The applicant has filed an appeal of the decision based upon the following: -RiA use is acceptable in RM zone. -Swinton Avenue, on the west side, is either single family or duplex from 10th Street to Atlantic Avenue, except for the church and Utilities of City. -Swinton Avenue on the east side, from this property north to 1st Street, is either single family, or multi- family with predominant usage being single family. -The entire block, immediately north, is single family. Additionally, the applicant feels that as long as a zoning change has not been requested, that the Planning and Zoning Board should not have authority to deny their request. The Director of Planning and Zoning recommends that the Commission uphold findings of the Planning and Zoning Board and deny the appeal. It should be noted that if contrary action is to be taken, findings should be made as to compatibility of the resulting land use on individual lots. ~8LW .5-0 - IIpp/l(!.t:Jt)f WR-nrs moeE I1mE 10 lU?,e,c:: will; jJ<f- ;Z I ceA- I ere. ('I( . c7LJ C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: HARDEN, CITY MANAGER XoOML- FROM: ID J. o ACS, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 APPEAL OF PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD DENIAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE GRIFFIN GATE SUBDIVISION ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of reversal of a Planning and Zoning Board action which denied a preliminary plat for the proposed Griffin Gate Subdivision. The project involves subdividing two parcels ( 1. 5 acre land area) into six separate lots under RM zoning. It is located at the southeast corner of Swinton Avenue and SE 4th Street. BACKGROUND: Please refer to the Planning and Zoning Board staff report for a description and analysis of the project. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION At its meeting of July 22nd, the Board first considered the plat and deferred action to a special meeting of July 29th. While the following items were of concern and debate: * provision of a ten foot special landscape area along Swinton with the developer installing improvements and the City maintaining them thereafter; * the need to improve NE 1st Avenue beyond its current 17' width with the ultimate width to be between 20' to 24' depending upon engineering design requirements; * installation of a sidewalk along N.E. 1st Avenue; * providing for rough site grading of the entire site as a site improvement, , City Commission Documentation Appeal of Planning and Zoning Board Denial of the Preliminary Plat for The Griffin Gate Subdivision Page 2 The real issue before the Board was "should individual lot development be allowed or should we encourage a single development of multiple family land use, thus having more site design flexibility?" Besides multiple family use such design flexibility could be achieved through an overall site development approach (master site plan as opposed to individual lot development). Also, such flexibility could mitigate adverse land use relationships between single family detached homes (or townhomes) and the adjacent land uses. On a 4-0 vote, the Board denied the preliminary plat based upon a resulting incompatibility of land use between single family detached and/or duplex units and the existing land uses of commercial/industrial to the east, the Drug Abuse Foundation to the west, multiple family to the south, and being located along a County Collector roadway. The applicant was informed of the appeal process and an appeal letter was filed in a timely and appropriate manner. A copy of the appeal letter is attached. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, support the findings and action of the Planning and Zoning Board and deny the appeal. Note: If a contrary action is to be taken, findings should be made as to compatibility of the resulting land use on individual lots. Attachment: * Appeal Letter * P&Z Staff Report & Documentation of July 22nd DJK/#85/CCGRIF.txt '1.1' . ~~~io~i~f. S E 4TH STREET f. 43 E. . . S.IP.C.P. North line Section ~~-~P!'!4---- __ -+--4-----139.16.- .: --,- , 1:0 . ~ 10 : 10 tel 10 . I i~ NS90 30' OS" E 139. 76' ~ ~g I 25.00' f. 33 00' . f. _____ u SIt P.C. I . TRACT I AI SIt P.1.ft, I ! I , ! 1 g i ! i I i 11. 446 S. F. ~ i I N " I I t I. I i ,W I ( I CTl I I I ! ~ I I I cc I I I en.1 2 18 I l~ g IN I ~ N I ~ , I I- i 8, 665 S. F. I ! -" I .... I I I , . N I . 1 I I g I I ;: I I 10 ' I '* "' I I 0 I~ I o I I rn ~ I~ rn, 3 10' (0) ! 13 tOg I~~ IW I +-' rn N I ~ IT) I ::::> 'w I ~ IT) 15, L A E 8,665 S. F. 10' U.E_ I 1.JJ:Z .... ! >- 3::~ 3: . . - I W ' - I 0 <:C a: - . I >- ._ ' 0 I --< --< I"' <t: ,:Z~lo "' I I (\J I . 0 01 ~ (\J I 0 I- I-I-co 0 10 en ... 0 I 0 Za"" 01 4 100 1...--. _01 00 I~(f) I 3:01 :z:~ I:::: I en to , 8, 665 S. F. I W .. I I : I' . I I.. I en ~ I I I I ~ I, I I ~ I I I 5 I __~ ~ Ig Ig_~' 6' x 16' I nl I I nl b~or ~ I '4 Eue..ent 8, 665 S. F. : I 1 .- I I I . I i I I 1 I I I / I: 6 :0 I I g I ~ I ~ I , e.665 S. F. : - I ;: I I 1 - I 1 I ; ~ ~_.J3._0(L_ Sa90 30' Oso ~l 139. 76' SIt P.U -_25-W-rSoI P.C.P. co a I SIt p.R.n. . a N Z I Lot I, Block 1 '. I . SW I NT ON OAKS' \ ~. L + (P847, P 74, p.8.e.A.) . \ 'I .~ 97.E.d g7.iffn Conj.ttu.ction ~ St _0. Fred L. Griffin i RECE\VED 1050 S. Federal Hgwy. 11130 cg 16 I q ( (-:j nl (407) Delrav Beach, Fl. 33483 272-3352 COY CLERK August 2, 1991 City of Delray Beach ATTN: City Clerk 100 N. W. 1st Ave., Delray Beach, Florida 33444 RE: Preliminary Plat reauest to subdivide Block 1, Lots 1 and 2, Swinton Oaks, into 6 individual lots for single family and duplex units. Dear City Clerk: At the meeting of July 29, 1991, subject plat was rejected by the Planning & Zoning Board. This was rejected pursuant to Chapter 3.3.3.(E) - Compatibility regarding land use. We choose to appeal this action based on the following information: 1. RIA use is acceptable in RM zone. 2. Swinton Avenue, on the west side, is either single family or duplex from loth st. to Atlantic Ave. except for the church and utilities of City. 3. Swinton Avenue on the east side, from this property north to 1st st., is either single family or multi-family with predominant usage being single family. 4. The entire block, immediately north, is single family. We request that based on this information, the subdivision plat be approved as submitted. As long as a zoning change has not been requested, Planning & Zoning should not have the authority to deny our request. All lot sizes meet current city requirements. 'I'. August 2, 1991 City of Delray Beach RE: Preliminary Plat request: Pal:le -2- The owners of this property, D.E. & E. D. stewart, are being represented in this by Fred Griffin of Fred Griffin Construction, Inc. Yours /},ruly, , ;:;/ ! /-:0' // .vl/", _J __ ~--:/I: ~---:_--- ;7_--" / ~ --, ~ ~/- /-- -- / I Fred L. Griffi~"J Fred Griffin Co struction, Inc. xc: file PLANNING & ZONING BOARD CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH --- STAFF REPORT --- . \U. .NO DATE: July 22, 1991 ~GENDA ITEM: IV.A. ITEM: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat Submission for Griffin Gate Subdivision Swinton Avenue South of 4th Street. ", I I I I , '-----' , 'I LW. 4111 STIlET ... LL I I I , I Nl I --.-- i I ,--, I , u. _4~ERAL DATA: Owner...........................D.E. Stewart & E.D. Stewart Agen t. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fred Gr iff i n Location........................On the southeast corner of Swinton Avenue and S.E. 4th Street. Property Size...................l.27 Acres City Land Use Plan..............Medium Density 5-12 du/acre. City Zoning.....................RM (Multi-Family Residential) Adjacent Zoning.................Land to the west of the subject property is zoned CF (Community Facilities), land to the east of is GC (General Commercial), land to the north and south is zoned RM. Existing Land Use...............Unimproved vacant land. Proposed Land Use...............Six (6) single family lots. Water Service...................Existing on site. Sewer Service...................existing on site. IV.A. .1.1' ~ ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The item before the Board is action on a preliminary plat for Griffin Gate subdivision. The subject property is portion of Swinton Oaks Subdivision, Block 1, Lots 2 and 3, located south of S.E 4th Street, between Swinton Avenue and S.E. 1st Avenue. The site contains approximately 1.27 Acres. Note: By definition this plat is considered a major subdivision, as it involves the creation of more than 2 lots and dedication of additional right-of-way. Per the LDR'S, a final plat may receive a conditional certification by the Planning and Z9ning Board. BACKGROUND: At its meeting of September 22, 1981, the City Commission approved a final plat for Swinton Oaks subdivision. The proposal was to provide 3 lots with 21 multi-family units. Eight (8) multi-family units were built on Lot 1. No development occurred on Lots 2 and 3. On June 7, 1991, the Planning Department received a petition for Griffin Gate Plat being a replat of Lots 2 and 3. Upon further review of the petition, staff had concerns regarding access to the lots and requested that a sketch plan be submitted. The plat and the sketch plans are now before the Board for a recommendation. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Lots 2 and 3 are currently vacant. The proposal is to create 6 individual lots. Duplex units are proposed for Lots 1,5 and 6. Single family units are proposed for Lots 2,3 and 4. Access to Lot 1 will be from S.E. 4th Street. The balance of the lots will have access onto S.E. 1st Avenue. We note, however, that duplexes may be constructed upon any or all of the new lots. PLAT ANALYSIS: REQUIRED FINDINGS - CHAPTER THREE: Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Finding) prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the following four areas; Concurrency, Consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Compatibility with ,," P&Z Staff Report Griffin Gate Plat Page 2 the Comprehensive Plan Policies and Compliance with Land Development Regulations. Future Land Use Map: (The use or structures must be allowed in the zoning district and the zoning district must be consistent with the land use designation). The subject property is zoned RM (Multi-Family Residential). The Future Land Use Map designation is Medium Residential. The zoning district is consistent with the land use designation. Concurrency: (Facilities which are provided by, or through, the City shall be provided to new development concurrent with issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. These facilities shall be provided pursuant to levels of service established within the Comprehensive Plan. For sewer and water, concurrency shall mean that direct connection to a functioning municipal system is made. For streets (traffic), drainage, open space (parks), and solid waste, concurrency shall be determined by the following: * The improvement is in place prior to issuance of the occupancy permit; * The improvement is bonded, as part of the subdivision improvements agreement or similar instrument, and there is a schedule of completion in the bonding agreement; * The improvement is part of a governmental capital improvement budget; it has been designed; and a contract for installation has been solicited. Water/Sewer: Water and sewer are readily available to the site. The only extensions required are that of service latterals to the individual lots. Drainage: No drainage plans have been submitted to date. There is an approximate 3' slope from Swinton Avenue to S.E. 1st Street. Per -Code, the finished floor elevation must be 18" above the average crown of road. Since this is not a unified development where drainage would be addressed for the entire site, it would be appropriate to provide a preliminary drainage plan, in order to determine if rough grading or other measures should be imposed as a condition of approval. Streets and Traffic: The initial sketch plan showed access to the units from Swinton Avenue. Per the County's Roadway Classification, Table T-4 in the Traffic Element provides for Swinton Avenue as a collector street with a right-of-way width of 60'. '1-1' P&Z staff Report Griffin Gate Plat Page 3 ~ Pursuant to Section 6.1.2(A)(7), limited access easements are required along arterial and collector streets except for approved points of ingress and egress. The City Traffic Engineer determined that back-out parking onto Swinton Avenue creates an unsafe situation. Thus, requiring access from S.E. 1st Avenue. The plat was revised to reflect a 5' limited access easement along Swinton Avenue. Pursuant to Section 6.1.2(A)(5), Where development abuts an arterial street, the City may require reverse frontages with screen planting contained in a non-access easement. Although, Swinton is a collecter street, it would be appropriate to require some sort of screening along the non-access easement. The screen material may be in a form of plant material or wall as appropriate. S.E. 1st Avenue has a pavement width of 17 feet. Pursuant to Section 6.1.2(B)(3)(a), the pavement width of a local street is 24' . The applicant has formally requested that the above requirement be waived for S.E. 1st Avenue. The applicant's justification stated that "the widening of the street would place a cost burden on the residential development to the benefit of the commercial uses to the east". Upon the recommendation of the City Engineer with the approval of the Fire Marshal, the City Commission may authorize a reduction in the minimum required width of paving, if it would constitute a hardship and the reduction does no endanger public safety and welfare. The City Engineer has determined that the widening of the pavement is required for that portion of S.E. 1st Avenue which abuts the subject property. Thus, he is not . recommending acceptance of the current situation. Sidewalks Pursuant to Section 6.3.1, a 5' sidewalk is required along S.E. 1st Avenue, S.E. 4th Street and Swinton Avenue. There is an existing sidewalk along Swinton Avenue and a proposed sidewalk along S.E. 4th Street. The applicant is requesting a waiver for the required sidewalk along S.E. 1st Avenue. The applicant's justification states that "the subject street adjoins an industrial development and that a 5' concrete walk is provided on Swinton Avenue and S.E. 4th Street which would be used by pedestrians". No building (architectural) elevations were provided. However, if a front door or side doors are provided along' Swinton Avenue, pedestrian access would be appropriate from the units to Swinton. It might then be appropriate to waive the above requirement. Also, it is noted that the existing sidewalk (along Swinton) may need to be reconstructed. If so, the reconstruction will be a cost of development. 'I ,~ P&Z Staff Report Griffin Gate Plat Page 4 Parks and Solid Waste: Solid waste will be accommodated by curb-side pick up. Single family residences create a minimal impact on the land fills. Per Section 5.3.2(C), a park impact fee of $500.00 shall be assessed per unit for the purpose of providing park and recreation facilities. SECTION 3.3.3 STANDARDS FOR PLAT ACTION: a. Building design, landscaping and light (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Building design and landscaping does not create any unwarranted distractions as it pertains to traffic circulatIon. No street lights have been provided along any the streets abutting the property. However, pursuant to Section 6.1.5 street lights are required. Street lights should be provided along 4th Street and 1st Avenue where the driveways are proposed. It may be appropriate to waive the requirement along Swinton since this will be the rear yards of the units. b. Appropriate separation of travelways is made for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. See discussion under Sidewalks on previous page. c. Open space enhancements. Twenty-five percent (25%> of non-vehicular open space is required. This development exceeds this requirement. d. That any street widening associated with the development shall not be detrimental upon desired character and cohesiveness of affected residential area. See discussion under Streets and Traffic on page 2 of ,this report. e. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. To the north and south is zoned RM, to the west is zoned CF and to the east is zoned Ge. It's questionable whether or not single family or duplex development is appropriate upon this RM zoned property. Pursuant to Section 4.6.3(B), where commercially zoned property is adjacent to, but separated by a street from single family '(I' P&Z Staff Report Griffin Gate Plat Page 5 ~ zoned property, the commercially zoned property shall not use such separating street as access unless no other means of ingress and egress to the commercially zoned property exists. Since there is no other means of ingress and egress for the commercially zoned property, there is an even greater impact on the single family residential units. A multi-family development could provide for the following: one point of ingress/egress to the parking area; thus, eliminating the need for backout parking; provisions for a wall or fence; the units could be designed where the outdoor living area is oriented to the interior of the site; thus, eliminating the rear yards along Swinton. f. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. The proposed development is less intense regarding density. However, creates a greater intensity in terms of soil, topographic and physical considerations (drainage) by providing 6 individual lots verses a single lot with unified control over the development of the land. g. In order to provide for more balanced demographic mix, the development of "large scale adult orientated communities" on the remaining vacant land is discouraged. This development meets this standard. OTHER: Wellfield Zone: The subject property is located in Wellfield Zone 1 and 2. Pursuant to Section 11(c) of the Wellfield Protection Ordinance this development is exempt from filing an Affidavit of Notification. Architectural Elevation Review: Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(1) duplex elevations will require approval from the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board. Swinton Avenue Beautification: The Decade of Excellence Bond has allocated $500,000.00 for Swinton Beautification from South 10th Street to the north City limits. The plan will include planting of street trees, improved swales, street lights, etc. .j'I' P&Z Staff Report Griffin Gate Plat Page 6 Since this is a single lot development, there would normally not be a mechanism to accommodate a unified landscape plan along Swinton Avenue. However, it may be appropriate to provide a 10' landscape easement along Swinton to compliment the Swinton Beautification program. The developer would provide the landscape material and the City would maintain it along with the balance of the Swinton improvements. This would allow for a unified look along Swinton, instead of 6 different rear yard treatments. LDR REQUIREMENTS: Within the Medium Density Residential (RM) District, single family detached dwellings and duplex structures are allowed as principal uses. However, the following standards apply: Section 4.4.6(F)(1), the provisions for the R-I-A District shall apply for single family detached dwellings. All the lots meet the development standards setforth in the R-l-A district. Section 4.4.6(H)(1), a minimum density of 6 units per acre is established for duplex and multiple family housing projects within this district. Density may exceed by the base of 6 units per acre only upon a determination by the Local Planning Agency that the resulting development is harmonious with adjacent properties and does not adversely affect areas of environmental significance. There is a potential to provide up to 15 multi-family units on this site, 12 units if all the lots where duplexes. The site does not have any environmental significance. However, the Planning and Zoning Board must make a finding that the resulting development is harmonious with adjacent properties. Section 4.4.6(H)(2), Notwithstanding the above, a duplex may be situated upon a platted lot pursuant' to Section 4.3.4(I)(3)(b). This section states that on a platted lot of 8,000 sq. ft., duplexes are allowed. All the lots have a minimum of 8,000 sq. ft.. There is a potential of developing all the lots as duplexes. TECHNICAL REVIEW ITEMS: On Plat: 1. Provide statement per Florida Statutes "There may be additional restrictions that are not recorded on this plat that may be found in the public records of this County". 2. Permanent is misspelled under legend. "," P&Z Staff Report Griffin Gate Plat Page 7 . 3. Limited access easement is to dedicated to the City of Delray Beach for the purpose of limiting access to the adjacent lots. 4. The utility easement dedication shall read "the utility easements are hereby dedicated to the public in perpetuity for the maintenance and repair of utilities located within". 5. Under City approvals, change as follows; Chairman, Planning and Zoning Board; Director, Planning and Zoning Department; Fire Marshall; Director, Parks and Recreation Department; Director, Public Utilities Department 6. On the location map remove Old Dixie Highway reference. Indicate the Federal Highways, and the Intracoastal. Also S. Swinton Avenue does extend south of S.E. 10th Street. Landscape Item: 1. Street trees are to be provided inside property line. Adjust accordingly. ASSESSMENT: The major issues associated with the proposal is the image that 6 individual lots presents along Swinton Avenue and the appropriateness of land use of single-family verses multi-family development. The proposed lots create a double frontage situation where the rear yards front on Swinton Avenue. Goal Area "A" in the Future Land Use Element, states that the remaining vacant land within the planning area shall be developed in such a manner as to enhance the existing quality of life and compliment existing land use. It's questionable whether or not this single family development can met the goal of providing a quality of life adjacent to a commercial zone district with rear yards facing Swinton Avenue without any mitigation measures. ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION: 1. Accept as submitted. 2. Approve the preliminary plat with conditions. 3. Deny the preliminary plat request based on a failure to make a positive finding in regards to Land Use. . P&Z Staff Report Griffin Gate Plat Page 8 ~ RECOMMENDED ACTION: By separate motions: 1. Approve the preliminary plat for the Replat of Block 1, Lots 2 and 3 for Swinton Oaks, based upon supportive findings made pursuant to LOR Chapter 3 and LOR Section 2.4.5(J}, as referenced in the staff report, and subject to the following conditions and waivers: Waivers: A. Deny the request for waiving the 5'sidewalk along S.E. 1st Avenue. Conditions: A. That 24' of pavement be provided for S.E. 1st Avenue. B. That a 5' sidewalk be provided for S.E. 1st Avenue. C. That a 10' landscape easement be provided along Swinton Avenue and the proposed landscape material is to be coordinated with Swinton Avenue Beautification plan. The landscaping is to be installed concurrent with plat approval. The landscaping plan shall be provided as a part of the final plat submission. o. That a grading and drainage plan be provided as a part of the final plat submission. E. That street lights be provided along S.E. 1st Avenue and 4th Street and be provided as part ,of the final plat submission. F. That the Technical Platting Items identified as 1 through 6, page 5 of the staff report, be addressed as part of the final plat submission. JM/f6/GRIFFIN1.TXT . ~1f ~ - - If. I.L . J ~ I &i ~ j .. .. I J I - .J ~~ U 'Ii -;;.. LW. 41'H 111 ~ .~ I _.J ... .. LL 8TH I ~ . LL 11M - U ill .... . ..- "r. ~ .... - I~ I GRIFFIN GATE I FINAL PLAT ~ f..... 1 ~ I . ~ , ~ I ", , MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGERP;U/ SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # q ~--' - MEETING OF AUGUST 13 / 1991 CHANGE ORDER NO. l/RIC-MAN INTERNATIONAL, INC. DATE: August 7 , 1991 This is a change order to the contract between the City and Ric-Man International, Inc. in the amount of $112,852 for the installation of water, sewer and drainage improvements on N.E. 1st Avenue, N.E. 1st Street and the adjacent alleyways in conjunction with the Old School Square project. This change order accelerates infrastructure improvements scheduled for this area and permits the work to be done prior to repaving of these roadways. The project is proposed to be paid for as follows: -Water line installation - $53,917.38 - 1991 Revenue Bond/Construction Water Distribution System Improvements (Account No. 447-5174-536-61.78) . Account balance $284,468. -Sewer line installation - $37,571.97 - Water and Sewer Operating Capital, Equipment Other (Account No. 441-5161-536-60.90) . Account balance $99,500. -Drainage line installation - $21,362.64 - Decade of Excellence/Old School Square Historical Renovations (Account No. 225-3169-559-61.69) . Account balance $303,522. The proposed schedule included completing all construction on N.E. 1st '"' Avenue by August 16, 1991 and completion of all alley sewer and watermains on N.E. 1st Street by August 30, 1991. Recommend approval of Change Order No. 1 to the contract between the City and Ric-Man International, Inc. in the amount of $112,852 with funding as indicated above. . Agenda Item No.: AGENDA REQUEST Request to be placed on: Date: August 6, 1991 ~ Regular Agenda ____Special Agenda ____Workshop Agenda When: 8/13/91 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much)____ Re uest Cit Commission to approve Change Order No.1 to S. E. 1st Street subaquaeous crossing (ES Project No. 90-59) in the amount of 2,852.00 for water, sewer and drainage improvements adjacent to Old School Square. Funding Source: Water 447-5174-536-61.78 ($ 53,917.39), Sewer 441-5161-536-60.90 ($37,571.97), Drainage 225-3169-559-61.69 ($21,362.64). ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 to Ric-Man Construction in the amount of $ 112,852.00. Department Head signature: ;jJ/~;f1.p~ -.--iJ ~;:'I Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: city Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): ~ Funding available: (~/NO Funding alternatives (if aPllicable) Account No. & DeSC~ip.tionA47-~174--~.~I.:')D WItrt.'e D\S1l? ItI\PRV. Account Balance~ ~l~ C't MR' qq ,sro 441-.Slbl-&3b.W.-qO'~ TQam1,.,-,.n- 1. y anager eV1.ew: ?O?S C--NI '-- j 22 Zz~~f. fb'1-58i.hl-bQ HI~1 KB1.Jo\J Approved for agenda: (NES/NO ~' ~ Hold until: ~ [1/- . Agenda Coordinator Review: Received: Action: Approved/Disapproved - DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: DAVID T. HARDEN CITY MANAGER ~ THRU: WILLIAM H. GREENWOOD ~~ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FROM: MARK A. GABRIEL, P.E~~ ASST. DIRECTOR OF EN R MENTAL SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER DATE: AUGUST 5, 1991 SUBJECT: OLD SCHOOL SQUARE WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Confirming our conversation earlier today, the break-down of costs for the above referenced work, from Ric-Man Construction, versus the prices from Stinson-Head (Old School Square's Contractor) are as follows: RIC-MAN STINSEN-HEAD FUNDING Water $ 53,917.39 $ 61,017.74 447-5174-536-61.78 Sewer 37,571.97 42,749.33 441-5161-536-60.90 Drainage 21,362.64 22,667.36 225-3169-559-61.69 TOTAL $ 112,852.00 $ 126,434.43 The Contractor proposes the following schedule: 1. Substantially complete all construction on N. W. 1st Avenue by August 16, 1991. This will permit curb and pavement construction to begin following Commission approval August 13, 1991. 2. Substantially complete alley sewer and watermain on N. W. 1st Street by August 30, 1991. Based on receipt of a Notice to Proceed today, Contractor will being construction Thursday, August 8, 1991. MAG:kt MGDH85.kt cc: Interoffice Memos: Memos to City Manager, David T. Harden Bob Barcinski, Asst. City Manager File: 91-62 (D) . ,- . -. f/:;? mC.1M!)}J\I) llNTImNA 1ll01MAlL, llNC. ~ GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1851 N, Powerline Fload . Pompano Beach, Florida 33069 August 5, 1991 BROWARD: (305) 974.S960 ' DADE: ($05) 945-2938 , : PROJECT': O~D SCHOOL SQUARE PAGE 1 OF 2 OWNER: CITY OF OELRAY ---.-.-- NO. ITEM QUAN' "Y UNI'f Ul'HT BrO TOT~'L -- -- 1 B" DIP WM CL 52 112136.130 LF 24.1Zi0 24, 8E:-l.. Q1Q1 2 (-." DIP WM Cl.. 52 80.00 l..F 24.00 tf80.Q10 3 8" RSGV WI BOX ~.l2I0 EA &25.0121' 3,750.0121 4 p II RSGV WI 80X 2.1210 EA 550.1210 1,100.00 5 8IX(," REDUCER MJ 1. 00 EA 31210.0l21 31210. 0lZt 6 6" MJ TEE 2.,00 EA 325.00 &50.00 7 2" POLY SERV WI FITTINGS 138.5121 LF 21.1210 2, 90a. 5121 B FH WI FIT, GV, !='IPE 8.0121 EA 1,75121.0121 3,500.00 9 REL.OCATE METE~R 4.1210 EA 31121.121121 1,240.0121 10 SAMPLE POINTS &.1210 EA " 1S4.01Z1 924.00 1 1 HYDRANT METER 1.00 LS 1. 0121 1. 0121 12 2" WM CONECT TO EXIST REV 1. 0121 LS 330.00 33'Zl. 00 13 8" X' 8" MJ CROSS 1.121121 EA 350.00 350.1210 14 10"X8" TAPING TEE 1. 00 EA 3,00121.00 3,0121121.00 15 8" MJ 4'5 DEGREE BENDS 3.121121 EA 350.121121 1,12150.0121 1& 8" TAP!='ED CAPSIPLUGS 3.0121 EA 27121.00 810.00 17 5& % OF RESTORATION * 1.00 LS 666121. 12 6,66121. 12 --.------.....,----- WATER MAIN TOTAL $53,917.62 18 MH 0/6 2.0121 EA 1, 51210. 0121 3,01210.00 19 MH 6/8 1.121121 EA ~,400.0121 2, ':~1Z10. 00 20 REMOVE EXIST MH 3.1210 aA 600.00 1, 8iZl0. 00 21 CONECT TO EXIST SEWER 4.00 EA 700.00 2,800.00 22 6" PVC 121/6 80.00 LF 21.00 1,&SQJ.12I0 23 b" DIP 0/6 2~.00 LF 32.50 942. 50, . 24 8" PVC 121/6 348.130 LF 26.0t2l 9,048.00 ,....:0 8" PVC 6/8 173.0~ LF 28.00 '., 844. 0121 C;,J 26 CONECr EXIST SAN SEWER 13.0121 EA 4121121.00 5,20121.0121 27 CLEAN OUTS 4.00 EA 150.00 60121.0121 28 34 1. OF RESTORATION * 1.0121 LS 5257.93 5,257.<:13 --------...-..---- SANITARY SEWER TOTAL ~37, 572. '+3 2<:) INLET TYPE C <7.1210 EA 525.1210 4,725.121121 3121 12" ReF' 50.i~. 50 LF 21.1210 10,594.50 31 is'' Rep 158.00 LF 22.0121 3,476.0121 32 TIE-IN TO EXIST DRAINAGE 3.1210 EA 34121.0121 1,02121.1210 7~ 10 1. OF RESTORATION * 1. 1210 . LS 1546.45 t, 54.6. 45 '-'w --.....---.....--.....---- STOR~ SEWER TOTAL .21,361. 95 . . . PAGE 2 OF' 2 34 8" LIMEROCJ{ BASE 315.00 SY &.121121 \ ' 1,890.0121 35 1-1/2" ASPHALT PAV~MENT 315.00 SY 3.1210 945.0121 3& FL..ORATAM SOD 11210121.00 SF 121.20 ~00.00 37 S/W CONC PAVERS ~0.00 SF 8.121121 480.0121 38 MAINT OF TRAFFIC 1 . l2I0 L.S 2400.1210 2, 400. 1Z,0 39 MOBILIZATION 1.0121 LS 91121121.1210 9,1121121.00 40 4" LIMEROCK BASE TEMP 1121121.1210 BY 3.00 300.1210 41 1/2:11 ASPHALT PAVMNT TEMP ~~.~7 SY 1. 5121 149.5121 -------"""------ * TOTAL RESTORATION $15,464.50 ----.--......------..... GRAND TOTAL $112,852.00 NOTE: MOBILIZATION INCLUO~S SURVEY LAY-OUT AND AS-BUILTS, l':\OND, TESTING W.M" LAMPING SAN SEWER, SUPERINTENDENT"PRE VIDEO, INSURANCE CLEARING & GRUBING, WM DISINFECTION, ETC. NOT INCLUDED: TESTING OF SAN (DUE TO EXISTING SERVICES), .JACKING CASING FOR WATE~ SERVICES, T. V. SAN LINES ( BY CITY), F' H. * METER FEE (WAIVED>, DENSITY TESTS. JOB COND1TIONS: NE 1 AVE CLOSED, EXCEPT LOCAL TRAFF1C WITH TEMPORARY RESTORATrON AT CITYS DIRECTION. NE 1st ST ONE LANE OPEN. WATERMAIN AND STORM SEWER TO COMENCE AT NE 1 AVE ON 8-9-91 AND SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED (PRE~IMINARY W.M. TESTED, ALL PIPE AND STRUCTURES INSTALLED) BY 8-20-91. REMAINING WATER, AND SEWER WORK TO BE SUBSTANTIALLV COMPLETED BY 8-30-91. ABOVE COND1TIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY DELAYS BEYOND RlC-MAN INTERNATIONA.L. INC. 'S CONTROL. APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS MUST BE RECE!VED BY 12 NOON ON 8-&~'c) 1. ;1,1' . . M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER 6711 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # q F - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 5/CURRIE SCHNEIDER ASSOCIATES DATE: AUGUST 8, 1991 The request is to approve Service Authorization No. 5 in the amount of $20,900 to the contract between the City and Currie Schneider Associates, AlA, P.A., to provide a consultant to perform a Value Engineering Analysis for Fire Station No. 1 (headquarters) . The analysis will be performed by Edward J. Nichols and Associates, Inc. , and is proposed in order to achieve maximum potential of the funds available for the project. Funding is available in the Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Central Fire Station (Account No. 225-2311-522-61.56) . Account balance $793,187. Recommend approval of Service Authorization No. 5 in the amount of $20,900 for a Value Engineering Analysis for Fire Station No. 1, with funding from Decade of Excellence Bond Issue/Central Fire Station (Account No. 225-2311-522-61.56) . Account balance $793,187. ~, ;11 Agenda Item No.: AGENDA REQUEST Request to be placed on: Date: August 7, 1991 ~ Regular Agenda ____Special Agenda ____Workshop Agenda When: 8- /3- 7'1 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much) Request City Commission approval of Service Authorization No. 5 to---- Currie Schneider Associates, AlA, P.A. in the amount of $ 20,9UU.UU to providea a Consultant to perform a Value Engineering Analysis tor the Fire Headquarters project. Funding Source 225-2311-522-61.56. ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION REQUIRED: YES/NO DRAFT ATTACHED YES/NO Recommendation: Staff recommends City Commission approval of Service Authorization No. 5 to Currie Schneider Associates, AlA, P.A. in the amount of $ 20,900.00. Department Head Signature: ~~~~~'"~ ~71ql Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: City Attorney Review/Recommendation (if applicable) Budget Director Review (required on all items involving expenditure of funds): ~ Funding available: ~/NO Funding alternatives (if ap~cableE . I Account No. & Description't'iI?'-2~/1-527. bl-Sfo '_ ._N1r<PL . / Rt;S1ArIDN Account Balance ,Q3/lg7 City Manager Review: Approved for agenda: ~/NO tr-J Hold until: Agenda Coordinator Review: Rec,:,ived: ~/., L IIi I Act1on: -, Apptoved/Disapproved CURRIE SCHNEIDER ASSOCIATES, AlA, P.A. CITY OF DELRT,' BEACH CONSULTING SERVICE AUTHORIZATION DATE: AUGUST 7, 1991 SERVICE AUTHORIZATION NO. 5 FOR CONSULTING SERVICES C ! "I'V P.O. NO. CITY EXPENSE COOE 225-2311-522-61.56 PROJECT NO. 91-58 (CITY) 90576 CURRIE SCHNEIDER ASSOCIATES, AlA, P.A. TITLE: Value Enqineerinq Analysis - Fire Station No. 1 This Service Authorization, when executed, shall be incorporat- ed in and shall become an integral part of the Contract, dated March 18, 1991, between the City of Delray Beach and Currie Schneider Associates, AlA, P.A. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Consultant and City recognize that the budget for the proposed Fire Station Headquarters requires careful monitoring. To this end a Value Engineering Analysis is proposed to achieve maximum potential of the funds available for this project. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES The study shall be preformed by: EDWARD J. NICHOLS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1224 Golden Hill Road Matthews, NC 28105 Tel: 704-841-1322 'I'he scope of work shall be as follows: Prior to the VE study week, the VE team shall receive five ( 5 ) copies/sets of all available project data, including drawings, outline specifications, any calculations, site studies and any and all narrative project descriptions. There shall also be included copies of the detail cost estimate that is being proposed. Time must be allowed for review of this data by the team, and there shall be a minimum of three working days prior to the study week for review of all of the above mentioned data by EDWARD J. NICHOLS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. They will prepare a detailed graphical bar chart and cost models based on the estimate, to aid the team in identifying potential high costs areas and/or potential areas for savings. This will occur prior to the beginning of the study. 'I-I' . On the first morning of the VE study, the design team will present a project brie~ ~q to the VE study team. The team will then follow standard ,~ procedures entailing creative brainstorming and detailed de~slopment ideas. On the last morning of the study they will present the developed ideas to both the design team and City personnel. This will serve as an early overview of the VE results. A written report will be prepared and forwarded to the City within 5-7 working days of the studies completion. The study team will consist of a Certified Value Specialist team leader and Architectural, Structural, Mechanical and IUectrical team members. The study would trske four ( 4 ) working days 1 conducted either Monday thru Thursday or Tuesday thru Friday. It is recommended that the VE study be conducted September 3-6, 1991. III. BUDGET The compensation for these services shall be as follows: VALUE ENGINEERING STUDY Fixed Fee of $ 19,000.00 ARCHITECTS FEE Fixed Fee of 1,900.00 TOTAL FEE $ 20,900.00 IV. COMPLETION DATE Services under this Service Authorization shall be completed no later than September 17, 1991 assuming Commission approval August 13, 1991. 'II. . . . This service authorization is approved contingent upon the Ci ty I S acceptance of and satis [~ction with the completion of the services rendered in the pn ' ous phase or as encompassed by the previous service authoriz&~~on. If the City in its sole discretion is unsatisfied with the services provided in the previous phase or service authorization, the City may terminate the contract without incurring any further liability. The CONSULTANT may not commence work on any service authorization approved by the City to be included as part of the contract without a further notice to proceed. Approved by: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH: CURRIE SCHNEIDER ASSOCIATES, AlA, P.A. Date Dat~~991 By . Larry M. Schneider Thomas E. Lynch (Print or Type) Mayor Title: Principal orporate Seal) n~ ( Witness ~, Attest: BEFORE ME, the for~99ing instrument, this Krh day of ~ ' 1991 Approved as to Legal was acknowle ged by r/ot7J rn.ScI1hOder Sufficiency and Form on behalf of the Corpo ation , and said person executed the same free and voluntarily for the purpose there-in expressed. Wi tness my hand and seal. in the County and S~ afo e d this day of , 1991. LM ' "jAII/^-J/1.' . / ./~.(';'(/L./ l{,;(..\...... ary Pu c State ofLFlorida My Commission Expires: ",orARY PUIlUC, STATE OF FLORIDA AT LARGE: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DECEMOER OS, 1993 8ON~D THRU AGENT'S NOTARY BROKUAGE 01.1' . . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER l'Jt 1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 9& - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 CANCELLATION OF CONTRACT AND AWARD OF BID TO SECOND LOW RESPONSIVE BIDDER DATE: AUGUST 9, 1991 This item is before you to cancel the contract awarded to D & L Telecommunications, Inc. and to award the bid to the second low responsive bidder, Altair Maintenance Services, Inc. , in the amount of $123,613.04 for Phase I of the Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project. At your July 9th meeting the City Commission awarded the bid for Phase I of the project to D & L Telecommunications; however, the recipient has refused to enter into a contract. In the opinion of City staff, after consulting with the City Attorney, the costs of compelling the low bidder to perform would exceed the difference in cost between the lowest and second lowest bid. Also, there is a good chance we would end up with less than satisfactory work. Therefore, staff is recommending that the contract be cancelled and the bid awarded to Altair Maintenance Services, Inc. Funding is available in 1991 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Repair and Renewal Sanitary Sewers/Manholes (Account No. 447-5169-536-60.31/Account balance $300,000) and Water and Sewer Repair and Replacement/Manhole Rehabilitation (Account No. 442-5178-536-61.84) . Recommend cancellation of the contract with D & L Telecommunications, Inc. and award of contract to Altair Maintenance Services, Inc. in the amount of $123,613.04 with funding from 1991 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond/Repair and Renewal Sanitary Sewers/Manholes (Account No. 447-5169-536-60.31/Account balance $300,000) and Water and Sewer Repair and Replacement/Manhole Rehabilitation (Account No. 442-5178-536-61.84). ,( if . ' - I ! . Agenda Item No.: AGENDA REQUEST Date: 8/8/91 Request to 'be placed on:' X Regular Agenda Special Agenda Workshop Agenda When: 8/13/91 Description of agenda item (who, what, where, how much): Request City Commission to re ect contract to D & L Telecommunications, Inc. and award Contract to Altair Maintenance Services, Inc., secon lowest responsive responsi e idder, ,for Project No. 91-23 Bid No. 91-42 titled Infiltration Inflow Project. Funding shall be from 1991 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond 447-5169-536-60.31 in the amount of , . . Fundin in FY91/92 shall be from 442-5178-536-61.84. Final anticipated expenditures on thi project is $150,000. ORDINANCE/ RESOLUTION REQUIRED: ~I.NO Draft~~f.~/NO p. 3Ihl.J,df~pUv fI/. 1 'II Recornmenda tion: Staff recommends approval Itair Maintenance Services. Inc. for Project #91-12 Inflow Infiltration Program, Repair, Rehabilitation and Re lacement of San~ar Sewers and Manholes. Amount , . D & L Telecommunications, Inc. the l~~.___ bidder was awarded the Pro'ect but refu 'to si n contract. See attached backu information for further clarification. ~~~-~- Department Head Signature: ~fl ~~/ Determination of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: -- ~~\- City Attorney Revie ,LLL....:.... -y..t~ w~; ble) : t' el_ -rk", - ~ - . fC. ' 9 . -------..,'-~ l- C' ~'. <c~2 <:~-rk,~ ."~' -;;k ~'? . 1 ~L "'-xL_ L...; Budget D~rector R f~c..,-t /j.s2ft~ (",;[\<.: {u.;:~~ involving expenditure of funds). ~~-.L'~ ~ Jf:,- 5k, t~ . ./Vo."",. L- ~. . ~ Funding avail =~ . J.c'-r:.,;X:;as.....p~--'--...j" L"'"'-4:...t--' Funding alter (f - r--L<_ "-L'T -..;. iJ"'~ (if apPl~~ble) Ac c oun t No. & C 'e-____t.-AC- ~""'- (. ~"-\..\ .L*,-<\ ti~";.. :? toO -~ WI (,.{) J Ar~ Account Balan c- -J:L .fr-:t+? --l "- ,,~ " "-d--...J '""-, v<- (. ~c ,. City Manager Review I - ~. Approved for agenda: YES/ @, {~I Hold Until: I Agenda Coordinator Review( Received: q;, Action: isapproved 'I." .' TABULATION OF BIDS Bid 1191-42 Inflow/Infiltration Program Repair, Rehabilitation and Replacement Of April 25, 1991 Sanitary Sewers and Manholes . D [,. L Altair Maint- Shenandoah Madsen/Barr enance Services General \ VENDOR: Telecommunica- Corporation tion Inc. Inc. Construction ITEMS and $ 243,900.40 $ 376,715.90 $ 795,575.90 $ 977,143.50 * I It)' 9/',7f t / l3 60.2)1- if fi llS't .61' ; In lJJ .Po No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid Complete all work fully with- 150 calendar 365 calendar 365 calendar 300 calendar in calendar days days days days days: Acknowledged Acknowledged Acknowledged Acknowledged cknowledged Receipt of receipt of receipt of receipt of receipt of Addendum's addendum's Addendum's addendum's addendum's 1,2,3, and 4 2,3,& 4 1,2,3, & 4 123 & 4 Bid 'Security Bid Bond Bid Bond Bid Bond 5% Consisting Of: $15,000.00 5% of total 5% of total bid bid. bid. * Total for bid Comments / items 1 thru 22 Exceptions: nd item 25B. id items 23 & 24 are relative )t /fE,I1J I-I? AIL ~'E ()!Jtf IrE y new experime - al sanitary ewer rehab. ~ Ilti ',Pcf..-rctJ A 1 iJlJ yjl1e . ethods which re not access- LJ tJ;l./< AJOR/(. JJjp iJ',/1';tJ) (T ;7j L/I'1J,M ble to this idder. We 1ct rU. ~,J/,JC herefore have tI lJMJ< at submitted (0)/7 {.6......- price on thes ~// 'Jl 'fA lYJ tems and have arked these tems as "No \ id" '-. ----~ _.- ~ -I > lJ:I !i ~ CD . 3: -< N N ~ ~~~~-~-~- - 0 ~-%~~manCJI~~ ~~~~~~N~O~~~~~~WN- ~ :z: z< CD ~NN-----~~ >%%%%%%%%%%:%%%%Z% - C >- -< ~~-~~~NO==~ ~-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-I ZC ~ ======== ~ ~ccococcoooccooooo m ~ ~ :z:m > ~ ~~~ c ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3: , 00 ~ C ~~~~~~~~--m lJ:I ->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> N I ~ CD --------~~ ~ ZCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 0 N m~ ~ ~~~~~~~~mm~ 0 ~IIIIIJIII~III'III m , > ~ 0 mmmmmmmm m ~ m--------_________ ~ ~ -I~ C -I ~ > ~nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn n _ 0- 3: > -I ~ Z ~ Z ~ , - >nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn- %~ - Z CD III1IIIIIIII111111 ~ > z _ ~ - mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ~ ZO ~ ~ 0 -I>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - =~ mzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 0 o ~ - ,----------------- Z I~ > ~ mzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz: mm ~ m <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ 3: > -I ~ ~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO - = -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ::o;:u - 0 m C ZWNNN--------~m~~~ o -I ~~~-~~~NNOOO===== " :z::: ------------- ~ ~ :::u z-----------.o.,,<<""'O ~ C ~~<n<<n<n<o~<-<nn< ." "no-on-n-n-<n"o."."n m - ."."."."."."~."."."n.,, ~ , n - ~ > ~ D~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ N N N~ ~~ g g ~S~ -~~~gN ~~~ ~-~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ o 0 OOO~OOOOOO O~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N - . Z I:Z::: ~~~~~~~~~~ ,11,1.111111111111 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ r > ~ ~~~00~0~~~ ~lJ:I~ , -~ -0> Z -I ..... VI 0 ~:a:- 0..... ~NN~-""'~""''''''~ O~NON~""'O""'O~-O""'OO""'''''' -~O . .......... .................. Ro r--Z _ 0 0000000000 ~O~OOO~~N~OO~O~~OO -I. o 0 0000000000 OOOOOOO~~OOO~OOOOO ~ ~~O >N... -I -I m - lJ:I ~ 0- ~ N-- N n z 0 ~ ~ ~ N~~ .....~-N~- ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~N~~ ~ i' ~ ~ g g ;il Sgg~~~~ggg ;il S~~g~~~~~~~~~;il~~~~ ~ ~ . .......... .. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .. z CO) o 0 0 0000000000 ~ OO~OOO~ON~OO~O~NOO - ~ o 0 0 0000000000 0 OOOOOOOO~OOO~OOOOO > :z ~~~~NNNNNN ~ o 0 ~~~~~~~--- O~OOOO~O~O~OO~OOOO ~..... N~~~~~~~~~ ~N~O~~O~O~O~~O~~~~ > o 0 ~OOO~UI~~VlUI ~VlUlO~VlOOOOOOOOOOOO r -I ~ - - ~ D o ..... 0 ~- N ..... ~ _Vl~ ~w~~ ~ ~WVl N -W--- _ -VI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~-N~~~~~ ~ g~~~~ ~O~~~N~~~~ - > ~ o 0 ~ ~OO~~UlN-Ul~ ~ ~ ~_.....~~~-~~~N-~NUI - o 0 ~ OOO~""'NNOO- 0 'VI~O~N~NOO~N.....VI~-~..... Z o 0 0 ooo~~~~ooo ~ o~~o~~o~o~oo~o~~oo ~ ~ o 0 0 0000000000 0 OO~OO~OOOOOOOOOOOO ~ "- ..... ,-. ....., ~ o ~ O~~~~~~~~O ONNNNN-NOOOOOOOOOO , o 0 O~ONOOOOOO ~~OOOO~O~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ 0 OOO~OOOOOO ~OOOOOOO~~OOOOOOOO ~ ~ ffi I""'- z: > - Z ~ m ~- N ~ m ~~~ ~ 0 - N -~ g ~ 0 VI ~~~ ~~~ON N ~~- ~ W~""'~NWO-~~ - ~ ~ ~ 0 0 OOO~~~~OOO 0 -~~-~~~~~~~~O~~NNN :z: o 0 ~ OOO~OOOOOO ~ O~NNNO~~~~~~~N~~~O o 0 N OOONOOOOOO ~ OOOOOO~O~O~~~~~~N~ , o 0 ~ OOO~OOOOOO ~ OOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOO ~ ~ N (lOI~~VI""'WN-""'- - ~ QOOOOOOVlOO -~~(lOI~~UI~WWNNN----"'" ~ 0 0000000000 NOOOOOOOOOOOO~~~~~ ~ o 0 0000000000 000000000000000000 0 ~ m z: - ~ , N N ~ N- ..... W N ~W~ N N ~ ~ S g ~ ~~~N~~~~gN ~ ~;il~ ~ ~S ~ ~~~~$ ~ ~ o 0 ~ ooo~oooooo ~ ~~N~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~ ~ o 0 0 0000000000 ~ O~~~NO~N~N~~~N~~~~ o 0 0 0000000000 VI ooooooooooooo~~~oo o 0 0 0000000000 0 000000000000000000 . ' ~ . N c.. N I'\J N m~~ ~ L-%~~mOn=> ~ L-=~~mO om> N ~~~ <~> ~NN~----~~~~ ~NN--__ -~~>n mmm >~~ ~~~~~~No==mm ~~~~~~N o==n= ;o;:lD""'O ;;lDm--t -------- (1)1: ------- - ::am . (I) )10 -om (I) --------",O"'O-m en ------- ~"'O,,_<:z ~ ~~~ ~ ~ i ~~~~~~~~;~z~ i ~~~~~~~ ~;;~~ ~ mm ~~> ~ ~~~~~~~~mm~~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~mmn~ ~ ~~~ "'ON~ ~ mmmmmmmm ~~ S mmmmmmm m m~ > ......z -Uf > me: > >~ r- -_:z:: "'0'0(1) r- nn ,.... (1)_ nno m m ~ mz II> >>~ 0> II> oe: II> t:"I - --4~m en::ar- - N::a - a o --(I) - - c ~> C mo _ ii ~~~ _ ~r- _ r-~ -t (l)N -t ....,::a --4 r- m o()o() ~~ m m m m 3: \101\101 ~~ 3: ~ 3: > ~ 00 00 ~ > .... WN n - N _ N 00 m N :;ltJ N :z ~ ~ \101 t:"I ~ I ~ ,.... ,....... > c... > > e: ~ ~ -' '"' (I) (I) - ~ -t ...... z x :z:: ::z: C') ,., ~ ~ e: e: e: m ~ ~ ,.., ....... 0 c- CD c.... X _ ~ ~ -< \101 ~N ~- NO ~~ NNN--NNN~- ~gg~o~~ gg~ << mmmmmmmmmm c...c...c...~c...c...c... c...c...c... ...... >>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ........ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" I WN.....--- I ~~ gg~~gg~~~~ ;~WNOON- -_~ 00 0000000000 .oo~ooo~ ~NO - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 Z 0000000000 .0000000 000 00 0 0000000000 :0000000 000 II> , , c , l.#'lI N- = N .....,. ..... W ~ NN ~ ~~~--N""'-~ ~'~N~ .....~N ~~_ N ~~ 0 oo~~oo~~~~ 0 ooo~oo~ 000 o 00 0 0000000000 ~ OOOOOO~ 000 o 00 0 0000000000 0 0000000 000 o co 0 0000000000 0 0000000 000 o 00 0 0000000000 0 0000000 000 ~NN------- ~~ W~N~~~N--O O~ '~~~~WO~~N~ ~ww~--- O~ _ oooo~ooooo N---~~~ ~~~ Z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 0 0000000000 0000000 000 00 0000000000 0000000 000 II> - c 0. WN .to- ..... VI"'" N o N~ ~ ~~~~~NNN~~ ~ ~N~ ~N ~~ ~ O~ ~ ~~V1.~V1W~O W ~~N-~~.~ ~o~ ~ o~ ~ ~~~\IoION~O~ ~ ~OO~~OO OO~ o 00 ~ ????~?~??~ ~ ???~?~? ?~? o 00 0 0000000000 0 0000000 000 o 00 0 0000000000 0 0000000 000 ~ N~ g~~~~~~~~~ ~NN~N~ ~ Uf~ . gggggggggg ggggg~Uf UfUf~ . . ,. .......... . . . . . . . . . . 00 _ . 0000000000 0000000 000 00 Z 0000000000 0000000 000 o II> - C ~ ~ N N - = N N-~ ~ N -~~ W~ ~N ~ ~~ ~ g~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~gg~~~~ ~~~ ~ 0\101 0 0000000000 ~ OOOOOO~ 000 ~ O~ 0 ?????????? 0 ??????? 000 o 00 0 0000000000 0 0000000 000 o 00 0 0000000000 0 0000000 000 W ~N-~-- ~ O~O()\IoI~OO() ~~~ ~ 0000000 000 o~ ,. ~~~~~~~~~~ 0000000 000 00 : . 0000000000 0000000 000 II> _ =11>11>11>11>11>11>11>11>= - Z .---------- o 0 .0000000000 """'" _ N N- .---------- -0 -'OW W- -t>> ~ ~- t:tJ 1---------- U1 ~D'OO -~""" ~o- o 0 - I ~ ooo~-o~ CON o 0 C, ~ OOO~OOO 000 o 0 =?: 0 ~~~???? 000 o 0 O. 0 0000000 000 o 0 C): 0 0000000 000 ".11 Z G:I l; -I c:: - 0 .. :z 0 0 -I G:I ~~~~~ )00 m If) r- ;lD m 0 0 i G:I 0 c:: C ... ;lD ::; )00 0 0 ::; )00 -< ;00; r- Z m m l2 :z Z If) 0 r- )00 m ~ ;lD 0 Cl -I 0 m :z: )00 :z ;lD -< m c:: If) Z -I N C,ol ". N VI II II II II . ~ G:I -<-<-<Z VI - mmmo 0 0 If)lf)lf) N ~ G:I C,ol Ii >() 0 0 0 ~ 0 C,ol G:I -<-<-<-< 0- C mm mm VI If)lf)lf)lf) C,ol G:I ()! 0 ..... Z ~ 0 VI , >() 0 .. .. .. OD -c:: ;lDO m -I om -I If) . G:I -<-<-<-< Z ... - mm mm 0;lD 0 If)lf)lf)lf) :zi G:I .:<1 )00 Ii II VI ;lD)oo II VI ;oo;:z 0 II ;Ji c::o "'O;lD C,ol II . m 0- Il >() -I VI II 0 m II II II .. II .. II G:lZ II -0 II 0-1 0 m)oo ;lDO G:I -<-<-<-< 0 C m m mm ...m If)lf)lf)lf) >() Olf) ::;j ;lD- G:I G:I Ii ~ "'0 r- ~ ;lDm 0 C,ol - C,ol ;", 0-1 0 -0 0 0 Z 'i .~ . , ~~T' DF DELAAY BEA[H 100 N.W. 1st AVENUE 0 DELRAY BEACH. FLorilDA 33444 .. 407/243-7000 August 8,1991 Mr. Robert L. Rothenberg, Vice President Altair Maintenance Services, Inc. 710 S. Milwee Street Longwood, FL 32750 RE: INFLOW/INFILTRATION PROGRAM (91-42) ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PROJECT 91-12A WORK PROGRAM SCOPE Dear Mr. Rothenberg: This letter will serve as our intent to award you a portion of the above referenced contract. It is the city's intent to construct bid items 1-18 only under this contract. All other work under this contract will be rebid and constructed under separate contract at a later date. The total "as awarded" contract amount will be $123,613.04 per schedule "C". Please find attached, actual quantities for the rest of the system that we want T . V. 'd under your contract ( Systems 1, 8, 17, 32 and alleys). We request that you complete this work with no more than two (2) crews working simutaneously. If the above is acceptable, please sign the acknowledgment below. Signed acknowledgment will be attached to the Contract Documents for the above referenced project. If it is not acceptable then all bids will be rejected and rebid at a later date. Please respond by Tuesday, August 13, 1991. If no acknowledgment is received by that date it will be assumed that the above work program is not acceptable to Altair Maintenance services, Inc. THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS _._-......---------- . -' . i Should there be any questions regarding the above, please contact Howard Wight with our office at ( 407 ) 243-7300. Sincerely, DAVID T. HARDEN ACCEPTED BY: City Manager For: Altair Maintenance Services, Inc. . HW/WHG/gm Att: cc: William H. Greenwood, Dir. of Environmental Services Mark A. Gabriel, P.E. Asst. Dir. of Environmental Services/ City Engineer Ted Glas, Purchasing Director Howard Wight, Construction Manager Al Monteleone, Supt. Water/Sewer Network File: Project #91-12(A) File: P:hw9112.doc . , / "' . ~ BID #91-42 Schedule "C" Inflow/Infiltration Bid I System 1, 8, 17, 32 and Alleys Quantities ~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM ITEM DESCR I PTI ON APPRROX ALTAIR MAINT NO QTY -----------------------------.------------------------------.-----------------.--------- 1 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 6" PYC 302 LF 0.50 151. 00 2 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 6" YCP 58 LF 0.50 29.00 3 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 8" YCP 66324 LF 0.50 33162.00 4 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 8" PYC 2839 LF 0.50 1419.50 5 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 8" DIP 275 LF 3.00 825.00 6 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 10" VCP 2863 LF 0.50 1431.50 7 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 10" PYC 484 LF 0.50 242.00 8 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 10" DIP/CIP 398 LF 3.00 1194.00 9 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 12" VCP 2184 LF 0.60 1310.40 10 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 12" CIP 265 LF 6.00 1590.00 11 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 15" YCP 7701 LF 0.60 4620.60 12 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 16" CIP 239 LF 6.00 1434.00 13 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 18" YCP 15 LF 0.85 12.75 14 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 21" VCP 3196 LF 0.85 2716.60 15 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 24" CIP 6 LF 30.00 180.00 16 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 24" YCP 6091 LF 0.85 5177.35 17 HYDRAULIC CLEANING OF 36" RCP 4174 L F 3.25 13565.50 18 ALL INTERNAL TELEVISION INSP. 97414 LF 0.56 54551.84 --------------------- SUBTOTAL BID ITEMS 1 THRU 18 123613.04 . . ':, ,,.; '.) ". ~ .,.~ " ;1'1' . M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER [J/'t/I SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 9H - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 CONTRACT FOR BEACH CLEANING SERVICES DATE: AUGUST 8, 1991 The City's contract with Universal Beach Services Corporation for beach cleaning services expires on October 1, 1991. The original contract, executed in 1985, was for three (3) years with an automatic three year extension unless notice was given. It appears that the contract was negotiated rather than obtained through the formal bidding process. Therefore, this item is before the Commission for a determination as to whether the contract is to be bid or negotiated with the current service provider. Under the provisions of the contract with Universal Beach Services Corporation, the following services are provided: hazard management, erosion control, debris and trash removal, raking and removal of seagrass, storm condition removal, maintenance of fore dune vegetation areas and operation of the Beamer Beach Cleaner. The base compensation for these services is $42,500.00 per year. Attached for your review is a comparison of beach cleaning costs in other co~munities. ~ W/~~;J'-~ . Beach--Gleaning Survey July 1991 Municipality I Contractor Length of # of I Annual ! I Beach Days I Costs I I ~-_.- I Universal I Delray Beach 6000 ft 5 *** ! $42.500 i i ! I Boca Raton I Self 12,000 1't 7 i n/a Yl :i I I Boynton Beach Universal 965 ft. 2/3 I $9.000 I (pro - rated) ! i Palm Beach County Self n/e 3 i nie 1l i (North) 3- 4 beaches I ! i i Palm Beach County Universal Gulfstream 2 I $4,200 I (Sou1h) 600 ft. I ! ! ! !I Universal South Inlet 5 1 $5.220 I ! 1 000 ft I '1 Universal Krueslei 3 $2.700 450 ft Ft Lauderdale Self 5 miles 6 n/a* Deerfield Beach Beach Raker 9000 ft. e , $47.000 i Pompano Beach Beach Raker 5800 ft. 6/3u $54.000 Lake Worth Universal 1 350 ft. t:. $12.000 oJ Monroe County Universal 1 400 ft. 7 $29.900 Key West Universal 3000 7 $60.736 *included in budget items. ue d1ys a week to tide lines. 3 days a week west of lines. ***includes emptying and maintaining refuse conlainers 5 days per "'~ek I, ,~ (i I (' , . / ~&1eif he" ~'- MEMORANDUM TO: David T. Harden City Manager FROM: Joe Weldon Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Beach Cleaning Service DATE: August 6, 1991 The contract with Universal Beach Services Corporation for the cleaning of our municipal beach expires October 1, 1991. The original contract was a three ( 3) year contract with an automatic renewal clause (unless notice was given) for an additional three ( 3 ) years, and paid $42,500 per year that included trash removal. Although I had prepared specifications for the bidding of this service, I was advised that this contract was originally not bid and was negotiated with Universal Beach. Please advise whether this contract is to be bid or negotiated with the current service provider. U~ Recreation JW: j mh REF: BEACHCLN. DOC Attachment cc: Allison MacGregor Harty, City Clerk >I ,~ - CONTRACT FOR BEACH CLEANING SERVICES This CONTRACT FOR BEACH CLEANING SERVICES, entered into this ...!:l.i:i day of '-;7'Y? ~ 198,,", by and between UNIVERSAL BEACH E:el<~ "-", SERVICES CORP., a Florida corporation, herein~fter referred to as "Universal," and THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, a Florida municipa,l corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City." WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, Universal is engaged in the business of beach main- tenance, cleaning and debris removal; and WHEREAS, the City owns certain beach property located within Palm Beach County, Florida, adjoining the Atlantic Ocean compri- sing of approximately 1.4 miles extending north-south along the At.lantic Ocean; and WHEREAS, City is desirous of engaging the services of Univer- sal for the purposes set forth herein; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual convenants and promises herein contained and other good and valuable consid- eration, the parties hereto agree as follows: l. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The general scope of services to be performed by Universal shall be to clean and maintain, in a rea- sonable manner, the entire length of the City's public beach during the term of this Agreement. Universal intends on provid- ing these services on the basis of five ( 5 ) days per week, with overlapping stretches of beach being cleaned and maintained each / day, weathei and environmental conditions allowing. More speci- fically, Universal agrees to provide the following services to the City with respect to the subject contract: A. Hazard Management. Universal has unique equipment available to lift and remove from the beach foreign material up to 1,500 pounds, to grade areas of beach and move fill from place to place in order to at- tempt to correct hazardous conditions that may develop from time to time. Universal agrees to pro- vide such hazard management services as the City SPINNER, DITTMAN. F"EOE~SPIEL-. DOWLING a. ....ANNING ~O. ~AST "TI..ANT'C .IlvT;::,,""r.: -'~l._q.a.."" ~~lor-:"" .,..\ ,-.0'....11. """'.144 ....~"', ..,-", ..,.,-- ll." 's hall reasonably request with such services, by way of example, including the removal of broken glass, the shoring of eroded and deteriorated walkways by moving fill into place around them, grading storm cut escarpments, r':!moving threatening debris and removing or recovering stairways and rip-rap which were covered by sand pumping and become exposed by erosion. Universal's services shall, however, be limited to those reasonably within the capability of the equipment within Universal's possession. Uni- versal agrees to be available for the performing of such services on an emergency basis and shall re- spond to the request by the City for the correction of such hazardous conditions as f:lrOmptly as reason- ably possible; it being understood by the parties, however, that in the event the City shall recognize minor hazards such as broken glass bottles or debris of a nature that can be removed by hand by -:ither the lifeguards or other reasonably available person- nel of the City, that such removal wi 11 be accom- plished in that manner by the City immediately upon recognition of the hazard. B. Erosion control. Universal possesses certain equip- ment capable of providing limited beach repair and erosion control measures. The City is from time to time in need of certain measures for erosion control and beach repair and, accordingly, Universal agrees to provide the following services to the extent of the reasonable capability of Universal's equipment: (1) Backf ill ing of washouts, particularly at the foot of eroded stairs and/or entrance ways, (2 ) Grading of excessive sand deposits, ( 3) Grading of escarpments to a more easily navigated slope, ( 4 ) Adding sand to and grading around lifeguard stands. SF>INNER, DITTMAN, F'EDF.:RSF>IE:L, DOWLING e. MANNING Universal's services as to erosion control and beach repair as provided herein are intended to promote vitality to the dune vegitation, to sustain the con- tour of the beach better against further wave action and to maximize the useab_e sandy portion of the beach for recreational enjoyment and coastal preser- vation in general. These measures are taken by Uni- versal in an attempt to effectively control, limit or eliminate sand erosion problems on a day to day basis, and although they provide stabilization for beach preservation they cannot be guaranteed due to the destructive potential of major storms. C. Debris and trash removal. Universal ag rees to remove all trash and debris, including wood, plas- tic, glass, rock and metal objects deposited on the City's beach by the ocean or by bather usage seaward of the Scavolea line. Universal shall remove and dispose of all such trash and debris as collected from the beach by transporting the same to the county's existing transfer station. Universal shall empty and maintain the refuse containers (refuse shall mean garbage-trash as these items are commonly understood) on the beach a minimum of five (5 ) days per week: Universal covenants that such service will .I be provided every Sunday and services on the remain- 17 ing four days shall be adjusted so that no large accumulations of refuse will be left unattended to. Universal shall maintain the area around the con- tainers in a cle'an and sightly manner. Universal further agrees that it shall properly dispose of the collected refuse and shall pay any and all disposal fees associated therewith. D. Seagrasses. Seagrass is to be raked (1) time per week from 300 feet north of N2 lifeguard stand to " the north property line of the Public Beach. Fr omV/ 300 feet north of N2 to the south property line of SPINNER, DITTMAN, F'EDERSPIEL. DOWLING a. MANNING 'I,ll the City Beach to be raked twice a week. The Atlantic Dunes Park Beach cleaned and raked ( 3 ) V times per week. Any seagrass selected for dune re- construction shall be suitably clean, devoid of debris, litter, tar etc. Uni ven-al shall remove from the beach and transport to the county landfill site any Seagrass inextricably combined with debris, tar, dead marine organic matter or other items not suitable for reconstruction in Universal's discre- tion. E. Storm condition removal. In the event of a hurri- cane, major storm or act of God whereby conditions are created that an unusual and excessive amount of material is deposited on the beach, then upon Univer- sal's request and the City's reasonable approval that such deposits are indeed excessive, the City shall provide dump trucks, drivers, and disposal fees to haul and dispose of such unusual and exces- sive debris and materials. #, F. Landscaping. Universal will provide services for the maintenance of the foredune vegetation areas which will include the deposit of seaweed mulch in and around the foredune vegetation at the direction of the City and the careful hand raking of the fore- dune vegetation area in the event debris is depos- ited by storms from the ocean into that area. There will be no mechanical raking in the vegetation areas except at the request of the City for particular areas. G. Beamer Beach Cleaner. Universal agrees to perform at least one cleanup per month with the Beamer Machine owned by the City of Delray Beach, in the event the said machine can be reasonably placed in good working order and maintained in such condition. Universal is to provide tractor and fittings to oper- ate the above. The City may designate specific days SPINNER, DITTMAN, F'EDERSPIEL. DOWLING e. MANNING ,,'11 -at their discretion. Universal shall be authorized to utilize said equipment for such additional clean- ups as it deems desirable. Universal agrees to lease from the City for the period covel.ed by this contract a piece of, equipment known as tre Beamer Beach Cleaner at an annual cost of $10.00. Univer- V sal shall have total responsibility for maintenance of the Beamer Beach Cleaner and shall at all times keep the Beamer Beach Cleaner in good condition and repair for the use for which the Beamer Beach Cleaner is intended. Universal shall at all times maintain insurance on the Beamer Beach Cleaner and provide proof of such insurance to the City. univer- sal further agrees to use the Beamer Beach Cleaner only on the area covered under this agreement and only for the purposes covered under this contract. Universal further agrees to keep the Beamer Beach Cleaner free of all liens and encumbrances. The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that Univer- sal's obligation to place the subject Beamer Beach Cleaner in good working order is subject to Universal's determination of the feasibility of such. 2. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of three (3 ) years, commencing October 1, 1985. This contract shall automatically renew for an additional term of three ( 3 ) years following the completion of its original term unless termin- ated in writing by either party at least ninety (90) days prior to the conclusion of the original term. 3. COMPENSATION. In consideration for Universal's provid- ing the services hereinabove described, the City agrees to pay to Universal the annual "base compensation" of $42,500.00 per year during the term of this Agreement. Said "base compensation" shall be paid to Universal in equal installments payable on the first day and 15th day of each month commencing on the first pay- ment day following the execution of this Agreement. SPINNER, DITTMAN, FEDERSPIEL. DOWLING e. MANNING '" ~ C"" ~ <::... <>'''' ll.. ",.....-- '" """1' 'C'" ""'C". 0",___ """".1.--1...< C'"" --..Q,-,..... '"""444 ,........, .,..."" c>q............ II'" 4. ACCESS. The City agrees to provide Universal with free access to the City's beach property and not to interfere with the performance of the service herein contracted for; provided, how- ever, that the City may reasonably restrict Universal's acceso. to the beach for safety reasons or emergencies. 5. DISPOSAL COSTS. Universal agrees to provide disposal services at its expense for all debris, seagrasses, and trash removed from the beach. 6. ATTORNEYS' FEES. In the event suit is brought by either party relative to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to collect all reasonable costs and expenses of suit, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees. 7. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Universal, during the term of this Agreement, agrees to at all times maintain public liability insur- ance relative to its business operations with limits nof not less than $500,000 individual/$500,000 aggregate coverage. Universal further agrees to indemnify, save and hold the City harmless from any and all damages to third parties resulting from Universal's performance of the services hereunder. In addition, Universal agrees to add the City as a co-insured under said insurance policy. The above referred to liability insurance shall contain a provision requiring that notice be given to the City thirty (30 ) days prior to any cancellation. 8. REPRESENTATIVE OF CITY. The City hereby agrees to desig- nate the City Manager as its representative for purposes of the administration of this contract; provided, however, that the City Manager may designate a subordinate to administer such of the City's responsibilities of this contract as he shall noti fy Uni- versal in advance, in writing. 9. UNIVERSAL'S LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE. Universal agrees to indemnify, save and hold the City harmless for any and all damage caused to the City's property due to the actions of Universal; provided, however, that the City shall be obligated to notify Universal of all buried objects known to the City and locate them for Universal in order to allow Universal to reasonably avoid such objects. The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the SPINNER, DITTMAN, F'EDERSPIEL. DOWLING So MANNING \1.\. existing communication system between the lifeguard stands on the public beach are not adequately buried to assure that they will not be damaged from time to time by Universal's equipment and, accordingly, the City assumes all responsibilities therefor. 10. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon the occurrence of any of the following: A. The filing for bankruptcy by Universal, B. Universal's failure to perform its duties required pursuant to this contract upon a determination by the City Council~ provided, however, that Universal shall be entitled to judicial review of such deci- sion. lI. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement may not be assigned or transferred without the express prior approval of the City. 12. DELINQUENT PAYMENTS. All payments due from the City to Universal which are more than thirty (30) days delinquent shall bear interest at the rate of fifteen percent <15% ) per annum. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals this CJ-d day of ~L~e., 198~ /?c.~~ /} ~,,~~,./ By: (hr,~_ 6~ (SEAL) CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ()~ /3o-Jftv By: a../~~~..~ p~.?~.)/ ~_~rx/ #//l yo -;; Attest: -t.1'fej~.J~~dn e-t// yeA E. 1<:: Approved as to form: By,~~.IW- y. Ci ty Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this date before me, an officer duly authorized in the state and county named above to take aCknowledgments, personally appeared JOHN PEART, known to me to SPINNER, DITTMAN, F'EDERSPIEL. DOWLING So MANNING . . - --- ~ - - ~ - ,I ,~ . be the pers~n described in and who executed the foregoing instru- ment as President of UNIVERSAL BEACH SERVICES COP!? , a corpora- tion organized under the laws of the State of Florida. He acknowledged before me that he executed the foregoing instrument as such officer in the name and on behalf of the corporation, and that he also affixed thereto the official seal of the corpora- tion. , rJ c fa fu'1./ SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this I..:S+ day of ~ t-embe r , 1985. ~~ I /f!. {{/~~t~(j!--,- Nolt y Publlc My commission expires: (SEAL) NC1AU I'Uill( STAll C' hOllCAl Ml ~u.lll.AllI)~IOH ..., HO't 13 1987 J9""'" ll!~>> C'" ""II"'~~1 ~ND SPINNER, DITTMAN, F"EDERSPIEL, DOWLING eo MANNING -,c--.- ., - ~ ,-..,..,...,.. -..-. ~,.~ ~,..~-'-' :-' --~'-... ....,..._,.-. .... -.. ..,~~ ............-. ~ ;~ , . . i M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER tM SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 9.r.. - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 INVESTMENT OF PENSION FUNDS IN ISRAELI BONDS DATE: AUGUST 9, 1991 This item is before you to consider allowing the Pension Board the option of investing pension funds in Israeli Bonds. Attached for your review is the Finance Director's opinion, along with a news article which explores the pros and cons of investing in Israeli Bonds. Recommend denial of the use of pension funds to invest in Israeli Bonds. 8~ l/k/ (mlJtp? 4/JcIJ d SS EnT71f ) '1.11 . ( . .- ,'-'1;' ,".' "~';' 'J'I..--~:' . ..t~-<<i''''':''4'''''''t"~~..I.._tt;.:o~ .;.'\'r:' '.-ME M'O"'R A N DU M TO: David T. Harden City Manager FROM: Joseph K. S.f~ Director of Finan e SUBJECT: Personal Opinions on Pension Investments in Israeli Bonds DATE: March 20, 1991 Your office requested comments on the issue of the Police and Firefighters' Pension Board request to have the Ordinances changed to allow for investment in Israeli Bonds. Personally, I am of the opinion that the Administrative Board should not direct the investment of Pension Funds in specific stocks, bonds, or other instruments. It is the duty of the investment advisors to invest employee Pension Funds and I would be concerned from a fiduciary liability standpoint if the Board exceeded their duties and responsibilities by directing the investment advisor to specific instruments. If this particular investment failed for any reason, the Board members could possibly beheld personally liable for exceeding their authority. Secondly, I am of the opinion that the Board should not put itself in the position of possible discriminatory actions since it is recommending one and only investment instrument outside the United States. What would be their reasoning? Thirdly, J: am of the opinion that the .Board should not put employee Trust Funds in any possible jeopardy of loss. The State of Israel is surrounded by countries that have committed themselves to the ultimate destruction of Israel, the political environment is unstable with extremists on both sides, and day to day life is one of confrontation, fear, and possible military conflict. I would not commit employee Trust Funds to investments in the Middle East that are not backed and secured by the United States government. Fourth, it is my understanding that there is no market for these bonds; therefore, they must be held until maturity and there is no alternative. This restricts the investment advisor who may have a market that would provide improved performance, but cannot liquidate the funds. JMS/slh . ... -~.. ',' .~ . Julie Jackson ( ~ ( Executivtl Director ::-~~.~ ~~ : Samuel Chafetz ," ~. Execut/vtl Chairman Robert Siegel STATE OF ISRAEl. SONDS PMC Chairman EXECUTl'JE BOAFIO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR ISRAEL Annette Abrams 2200 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY. SUITE 203 Gary Bernstein BOCA RATON. FLORIDA 33431.407-368-9221 ' fAX 407-368.9338 Edward Bobick Marianne Bobick Jun~ 17, 1991 Irene Danker Elaine Blish RECEIVED Barry Friedberg Florence Friedberg Maurice Friedman Mark W. Glickman JUN 19 1991 Alvin Greenfield Gloria Greenfield Evelyn Gross BY FINANCE Martin Grossman .. , Joel Halpern Sidney !<amino . Martin Kam . 0 Harold Kay ~. Vav~d C. Hakd~n, C~ty Manag~k Dori Klein William Konar C~ty Hail Abner Levine 100 N.W. 1-6t Av~nu~ Sylvia Malvin V~tkay B~ach, FL 33444 Dee Moore Howard Pittman.. V~ak Mk. Hakd~n: Mildred Pittman Benjamin Pressner Jay Raddock W~tcom~ back okom yoUk vacation. 1 hop~ ~t ~ ~njoy- Seymour Rappaport abt~. 16 you W~k~ away 6kom Fi.ok~da, you cuta~n1.y Ullian Rosenberg Margit F\Jbnitz m.u,-6~d OUlt dJtou.ght-~ndi..ng ka~n-6. Rabbi Dr. LouIs L. Sacks Bernard Schachman Th~-6 t~tt~k -6~kvt-6 a-6 a nOkmai. k~qu~-6t to b~ put on th~ Freida Siegel councit ag~nda OOk July 23, 1991. At that tim~, 1 w~il Rabbi Merie E. Singer Eugene B. Squires . b~ bkinging atong, MIt. Saul. Fk~~dman okomoUk nationat Phyllis Squires h~adQuakt~k.l>. Pt~d-6~ t~t m~ ~now how many ptopt~ w~il Walter Warheit b~ att~nding th~ mt~ti.ng and at what t-imt W~ ak~ to Nancy Welngard akkivt. CORPORATE BOARD Ryna Mehr, Ch~rman Thank you OOk yoUk cOn6id~kation. 1 too~ 6 Okwaltd to Arnold Berliner, M.D. Charles Brier .l>t~ing you again. Craig Donoff Monte Friedkln S-<.nc~lttty, Irving Gannet Herbert Gimelslob ~/ Jordan Ginsburg Alan Hurst Richard levy Ned R. Nashban JuLi.~ JaC~-60n Allan Porter Martin Schwartz JJ:hg Ralph Solomon Elliot A. Weinberg Btind CC: Jo~ Saoookd, Financiat Vik~ctok, City Hail ~ NEW LEADERSHIP BOARD Arvin J. Jaffe, ChaIrmiuJ Jim TIsdale, Co-Chalrman Benita Appel Cindy Braun Sieve Brown Mitzi Donoff Betsy Gardner CaroI,GM1 , Shawn Ruben REGISTEREO REPRESENTATIVES BUILD~O Rochelle Levy Mark Ruben EC~:~~~S ,)). . . Past Executive Chalnnan o Deceased YEARS $10BlLUON .~.1t ..-::.. -.... 'iI, . . . . (. I I ... ~ f~h--J< 'do~ ~ ~.~ MEMORANDUM To: Distribution From: John E. Tranter - Glades Road Subject: Israel Bonds I Buy? I Take as Collateral? Date: May 24, 1991 Attached you will find a commentary written by Robert Bleiberg, editor of Barron's Magazine. For those of us who have ever faced the question of investing/taking as collateral Israel Bonds will find this commentary very interesting. {II JET:jb Distribution: Delray Beach Police & Firefighters Pension Board Members ~ R. Michael Strickland Chuck Cross Terry McKay _ ___"_ ~_____ u. __u_ _ . .~~" ti." a _ r;ITORIAL COMMENl-:4RY Not for Widows and Orphans Fiduciaries Have No Business Buying State of Isr~l B.o~ds LETS begi~ Wilh an ex:se i~n- long and impressive list ofeities, inc1Ud-,' nol be sustainable without substan~rty odd-;ars after gaining independ- vestment decision-making. The in- ing Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Detroit, U.S. support, which remains' strong, ence, for example, the government holds vestment in question is the full faith and Hartford. Milwaukee, Philadelphia" flexible and timely." an esti~ated 93% of all the land, a state credit obligation of a sovereign state Pittsburgh and Providence, have ac- From Day One, moreover, Israel has of affalfS that has helped balloon con. which, in its entire history, has never quired State of Israel bonds for their clung-and continues to cling-to so- struction costs, subsidize a less and less failed to pay, in full and on time, the pension-fund portfolios. To quote the',. cialist practices and polieies now proven produc!ive agriculture and discourage principal and interest on any of its bor- New York Post, which editonally sup- unworkable, and totally discredited, mdustnal expansion. "If it wasn't for rowings, either at home or abroad. Fur- ports the commitment, NYC Comptrol- throughout most of the rest of the world. government interference," claims Daniel thermore, the state is a member in good ler Liz. Holtzman is "actively consider- ' Our investment opinion: not for widows , Doron, director of the Israel Center for Ilsoding of the United Nations, Interna- ing puning some pension ,money" into' and orphans. Social and Economic Progress (IC- tional Bank for Reconstruction and De- such securities. You don't have to be Jewish, as the' SEP) -one of the country's few free- velopment, Intef!1ationa! Monetary Here we must art com an with the'. advertisi;ng slogan goes, to love Levy's market .think tanks-"a $100,000 fIat in Fund and Intec:natlonal Froance Corp., approving crowd~ Althou:h ~ere are rye, but It doesn't hurt. The same doubt- Tel AVIV would only cost some $30,- as well as a sIgnatory to the General too man ublic em 10 ees throu hout.Jess holds true of buyers of State of 000." . ~greement on Tariffs. and Tra~e. ~d the cou! p -scand1:oJsI so in gNew" Isra~l' b.<>nds, .two series .of which offer Bad. en~ugh in. ~e ~t of .times, Its bonds are offered m denommations York Cit ~af\er 20 or 30 Years of "serv-' , speclalmcentives to tourysts. For exam- such mlS~ulded J?Olic!es-m, the light of Ihat range fro~ ~250 10.$25.000, under ice" the: are stiU entitled to retire and ple~ so-called cu~eot mcome bonds, the ma~lve ~mtgralton of Jews from terms . an~ ~ndltlons ~es!gn~d to ~ttract th~ money must be there. Viewed ,trictly , which pay a penuflous 4% yearly, af\~r the SovIet Umon now afoot:- becomes a both mdlvldual and lDStttuttonal mvcs- as an investment, State of Israel bonds' 12 months' tune may be exchanged m palpable threat to. the nation's healt.h tors. . . faU short on several counts." Israel ~or amounts up to S2,500 per and welfare. In a piece on an <<:anomlc Big pluses. At the same time, how-' .. ' , person m local currency, presumably to conference held by ICSEP on Its ftfth ever, let's not overlook some potential For one thing, whtle. not. ~orm~Uy help defray the cost of the trip. SIlIli- anniversary a year ago, a columnist for minuses. Since the issuer never re- graded, they do carry an tmP~Clt rating :'-larly, State of Israel S250 certificates The Wall Street Journal observed: "But 'quested one, the aforesaid bonds carry from Sta?dard el Poor'~ of Tnp1e-B mi- , may be used to buy either a ticket on the sludge that socialism has introduced no formal ratina from fitch, Moody', or. n~ -that'ththc loli miliestmeD.t-~dO El AI Airline or a S500 Israeli bond at a into the Israeli economy will make it Standard el Poor's. There is no public ratin& OIl e ~ e. y e same to en, , discount.' difficult for Israel to absorb the Soviet market-aner a period of three to seven SelP ra.tes Israeli short-term paper A-3".,::., Appropriately enough, over the years Jews.. .. The state bureaucracy resches years, depending on the type of holder, a ranlemg so low that money-market~, some of the harshest criticisms of Israel's ' into every oorner of Israeli life, adminis- they're eligible for repurchase by the fund'! as the SEe has recently rule~,: statist policies have come from co-reli- tering a complex web of prerogatives, issuer at 100% of prinCipal amount plu, may mvest !lo more than S9! of thelt" gionists. In the late 'Seventies, Professor subsidies, protections, trado barriers and accrued inlerest total assets m such commercta~ paper. Milton Friedman, Nobel laureate in, the like that stifle individual initiative As to rates of return, they run from a AI to returns, the~. fall COIIS1derably econ9mics, on a visit to the country, and creativity. minimum of'7~~, plus one-half the ex- .hon or what. secunties or comparable :, urged it for its' own good to follow "Because of capital controls and the cess over 1~% of the average prime rate quality yield m the marketplaco today.;... the example of the U.S. in the Nine- economic dominance of nationalized charged by several leadina money-cen- , Diet ~lone ~e'?~ target that.,Mdayof4r-tcenth' Century, when, he pointed out, banks, capilal allocation is woefully in- ler banks (or a aUlD tola.l or 8~'" right aVid N. D!nkms r:eccntly decree fo:, the economy grew very fast without fed-, efficient.... The government designates now) (or bonds that mature in slightly New York City pension funds. ' .,)1 eralintervention, while welfare services, who can grow what fruit and woe to the over 11 years, to 4% on IS-year IO-caUed Beyond considerations of dollAn and ~ then in private hands, worked more ef- individual who owns more than three current income bonds (plus a fringe cents lie philosophic issues. Throughout I fcctively."'" ," lemon trees without special permission. benefit for tourists). On the world'. cap- its 42-year history, aner all, tho Slate of ' Since the 'Seventies, of course, the Even the size and shape of (jeUy} ital mar~ets, that', Jess than competitive. Israel has depended fmancially on the ' free world nearly everywhere has come doughnuts baked for Hannukah are * * * kindness of stran&ers. AI SelP, which to recognize, the glaring failure of the ,pecified by the government" . Clearly a trick question, and the an- rates the outlook negative, gently puts it:', command economy. Nonetheless, de- * * * swer-at least for a good many inves- "The coun~'s ab~ty to meet the bur- spite sporadic attempts at reform, in the Socialist failure at home has agra- tors-has been equally obvious: buy. den of persIStent rqlonal teDSiona would. slate of Israel socialism still holds sway. vat~-jf ~at'~ possible-Israel's bad F.. tho ob"""M .. .....ion.._ I I""""" ..... .. Anb .,;ab"'" '" to be State of Israel bonds, which in : ::". i - ~v Schiff, distinauished Israeli jour- recent months-especially since mid- , , nalist ~d author of Inti/aM (a book January, wben war broke out in the BARR 0 N, S MAl L BAG on the Violent response by the people of Persian Gulf-bave been snapped up by Palestine in recent years to decades of any and everyone eager to lend fmandal i. C . Israeli occupation)' writes: "Worse yet, and moral support to that beleaguered or WEhIO,!..~O ~ND ON ters, ~peclally when a storm might be the Palestinians found themselves com- I d' .0 t e """lIor. brew..... 1 tit th fth. il d . . an . I . h 'd b M rt Z .. ...... pee y a e mercy 0 e ClV a mlDIS- Specifically, according to the Devel- F b 'ftas ;nrlc (~It' y B II ~ :~~) s ANTIiONY J. CRESCE~ZI tration in every sphere of economic life. opment Corp for Israel underwriter Teh' 1 a Ihc ~ d s aed ~ . ar et., New York City Each request for a permit, grant, or . . , . e ru es e s a oot .or mves mg d' . iled . Since 1951 orall of Ihat country's secun- h'l t II 'f .. hi" I' ' * * * ISpensauon enta an exhausung . w I e no a new or mClSlve, are e p.u I'th bbed b lies sold ~broad, an em~r,ency two- to review. Alan Abelson might also ben- To the Editor: wrest e .Wl. a cra urea~ctacy of week offenng of SIOO million of five fi Ii b" th I' " " ,,_mostly mdifferent, but sometimes has- outslanding series was comfortabl e.11 ro~ 0 se~mg.. ~ ru es, espe- . Marty Zwetg I double-barrel buy tile, clerks and officials-a veritablojug- oversubscribed by expiration date eal. Clally,. ~e neXl~le. It s, okay to be 'tgnal shows a perfect r<<:<>rd ov~r tho gernaut of 400 Jewish mandarins man- lier this month. Heartened by the re- wrong, It s unforgivable to stay wrong. past 60 some. years. W?ile that s no aging thousands of Arab minions bereft sponse from Jews and non-Jews alike LOUIS DAWSON guarantee ag~mst loss.m the future, of all authority. Complex tax and cus- Development CoT' is seeking to rai~ Los Angeles the~e are solid theoretical rcaso~ to toms laws, restrictive marketing arrange- another $375 milhon or so by the first * * * beheve that these. results arc not Just a ments, and a slew of bewildering decrees day of Passover which happens to fall To the Editor: . ~aller of luck m a 50-50 game of and regulations were the weapons used on March 30. ' Martin E. Zweig's technical case for c ance. ' to hold the territories hostage to the a new bull market is compelling but Zweig's 'i&nal illustrates a "ooher- Israeli CCODQm)'. , ",.,On thatscore,...9f~urse, muchwiU .ipom factol'l tbatcould nnclormine his -ent" bull market, where the historical "By the 1980$, moreover the Pales- . depend Otl'h"hlyunl!redictable events conclusions. risk reward outlook for stocks gets tinians derived no compens~ting adnn- y~t to happen m t.he ~.Iddle East, but '!ie Few would argue that you can't tl!rned upside dQwn (see "The Coherent lage from ,this situation-such as the WIsh sellers and mdlvldual buyers ahke "~ght the Fed" as Zweig suggests, but Market Hypothesis," Financial Analysts appreciable rise in tho standard of living v.:~;~llfr.D~~IYbra boweva-,. ..I~ hIS argumen~ are devoid o~ reference to , Journal, Nov./D~. 1990). This occurs thai had mollified them during the first ,CC; ..or UlIe 0 elbonda alto II the extraordtnary underlym& rmaneial when, "group thmk" dommates pre- years of the occupation-so that their :~~:...~n;:~c:mhL.Lctplace- str~ (as opposed to the usual eco- ferred di~ection. Historically, stocks honeymoon with Israel came to a bitter " ' . I':"' ....-""'. .... - ~li~.. nomIc stresses) that have caused the Fed have prOVided about a 10% total rate of end. As far as they could see, the 'srm- '::'~~~~old~~~_to to be so abrupt and ,th~t co!,ld drasti. r~turn with a 20% standard deviation or ,biosis' between Israelis and Palestimans ~~orstate :tlOta1 undreds or ~lly alte~ the expectattons tmplied in mk. Coherent bulls theoretically pro- was more accurately described as " ~I1l'()ur,:,..".~eDt hIS analysIS. \ " vi~e ~ 25% annualized rate of return r~lationship between a horse r' ',. " , , ,"" " ~.,...:~_dlel;!ith In. .the current econoDUC climate.. With ns~ closer to 10%. nder." Without the free moo' ~~'~~'1' '. tcchDlctans could greatly benefit from DuntlJl coherent bull mar".." W.1l r.....__ ,.--....-.--- -.-..o"""""11l'us.:'.axlrdln. In r1i,. .....iI..._....:.__ _ ,--... ~ - 'IIlf I. ' . . II Jul~ JacksoD Executive Director Samuel Chafetz -, ExeCfJtive Chairman Robert Siegel STATE OF ISRAEl. BONDS PMC Chairman DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR ISRAEL EXECUTIVE BOARD Annette Abrams 2200 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 203 Gary Bernstein BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431 ' 407-368-9221' FAX 407-368-9338 J( j~ t i:-' EF Ji P Edward Bobick Marianne Bobick June. 17, 1991 """{ _':-~' ..__. ~? I~.,. _':.... .' Irene Danker JUN 1 9 1991 Elaine Blish Barry Friedberg Florence Friedberg CITY MANAGtR'C: orTI'-' Maurice Friedman ~ '-' , r, tJ!~ Mark W. Glickman Alvin Greenfield Gloria Greenfield Evelyn Gross Martin Grossman '" Joel Halpern Sidney Kamino Martin Karn '" 0 Harold Kay M't. Vavid C. Hakde.n, Citq Manage.k Dori Klein Citq Hall William Konar Abner Levine 100 N.W. 1-6t Ave.YULe. Sylvia Malvin Ve.lkaq Be.ach, FL 33444 Dee Moore Howard Pittman '" Ve.aJt MJt. HaJtde.n: Mildred Pittman Benjamin Pressner Jay Raddock We.lc.ome. bacfz bJtOm qouJt vacation. I hope. it wa-6 e.njoq- Seymour Rappaport able.. In qou we.Jte. awaq bJtom F 1000ida , qou ce.Jttainlq Ullian Rosenberg mJ..-6-6e.d OUJt dJtought-e.nding JtaiYl.-6. Margit Rubnitz Rabbi Dr. Louis L. Sacks Bernard Schachman Thi-6 le.tte.Jt -6e.JtVe.-6 a-6 a boJtmal Jte.que.-6t to be. put on the. Freida Siegel council age.nda bOJt Julq 23, 1991 . At that time., I will Rabbi Merie E. Singer Eugene B. Squires '" be. bJtinging along MJt . Saul FJte.e.dman bJtom ouJt national Phyllis Squires he.adquaJtte.Jt-6. Ple.a-6e. le.t me. fznow how manq pe.ople. will Walter Warheit be. atte.nding the. me. e.ting and at what time. we. aJte. to Nancy Weingard aJtJtive.. CORPORATE BOARD Ryna Mehr, Chairman Thank bOlt COYl.-6ide.Jtation. I loofz n OItwaJtd to Arnold Berliner, M.D. qou qOWl. Charles Brier -6e.e.ing qou again. Craig Donoff Monte Friedkin Since.Jte.lq, Irving Gennet Herbert Gimelstob f-L /4-" Jordan Ginsburg iJ' ~.{~ tt: }:~JY() Alan Hurst Richard Levy Ned R. Nashban Ju.f.ie. J cfz-6on Allan Porter Martin Schwartz JJ:hg Ralph Solomon Elliot A. Weinberg NEW LEADERSHIP BOARD Arvin J. Jaffe, Chairman Jim Tisdale, Co-Chairman Benita Appel Cindy Braun Steve Brown Mitzi Donoff Betsy Gardner Carol Gart Shawn Ruben REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES BUIW2lQ Rochelle Levy Mark Ruben ISRAEL'S '" Past Executive Chairman ECONOMY o Deceased YEARS $10 BIWON @~476 ..'~N"'.. u...". .... , , , . [ITY DF DElRAY BEA[H , .i. ~_~ June 27, 1991 Ms. Julie Jackson Executive Director State of Israel Bonds 2200 North Federal Highway, Suite 203 Boca Raton, FL 33431 Dear Ms. Jackson: In response to your letter of June 17, 1991, please be advised that your request has been scheduled for the July 23, 1991, regular meeting agenda of the Delray Beach City Commission. It is my understanding that you will be making a presentation with respect to the benefits of investing pension funds in State of Israel Bonds. The meeting will begin at 6:00 p.m. and will be held in Commission Chambers at City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach. The City Commission is composed of five members (Mayor and four Commissioners). In addition, the City Manager, two Assistant City Managers, the City Attorney and the City Clerk will be in attendance at the meeting. As this matter is of a financial nature, the City's Finance Director will also be present. Should you have literature to distribute, sufficient copies should be provided for each of the individuals mentioned above. You will be contacted prior to the meeting to reconfirm your attendance. Staff will be able to provide you with more specific information as to the placement of your item on the agenda at that time. Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, l1-rk,-,~ David T. Harden City Manager DTH/AMH/m cc: Joseph Safford, Finance Director THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS , . M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGERfH SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 9Jr - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 APPOINTMENT OF TWO MEMBERS TO THE EDUCATION BOARD DATE: AUGUST 8, 1991 At the Commission's regular meeting of July 23, 1991, both Commissioner Andrews and Commissioner Mouw postponed their appointments to the Education Board. At that meeting, Commissioner Randolph appointed Deborah Wright to a term on the board ending July 31, 1993. The terms of Thomas Fleming and Beth Mulholland expired on July 31, 1991. Mr. Fleming has notified us that he is no longer interested in being reappointed. Mrs. Mulholland, however, is eligible for and would like to be considered for reappointment. Her application is attached for your review. The term of office is for two (2) years and will expire on July 31, 1993. Pursuant to the City's code, the members of the Education Board shall be residents of the City of Delray Beach or shall be a person with a child or children attending Delray Beach public schools. Should a member of the Education Board not be a resident of the City and should that member's child or children cease attending Delray Beach public schools, then such member shall no longer be qualified to serve on the board. The following individuals have also expressed an interest in being appointed to the Education Board and have submitted their resumes for consideration: Linda L. Cochran Kathryn S. Sloan Joseph Valentino (currently serving on Kids and Cops) Horace Waldman Recommend appointment of two members to the Education Board to terms ending July 31, 1993. In accordance with the established rotation system, the appointments will be made by Mr. Andrews (Seat #3) and Mr. Mouw (Seat #1). !GnOeEw5 Appoln~ tA-fhe~n SloAn rYlau...w 1\ 6s#r mu...lhollA-n.o . - CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BOARD MEMBER APPLICATION NAME -:6-L-1'r\ f'f\ I) \ ~\ \a Y) d \ 5;:;;"0 S c\ e..ve\~nd r2.c\ J:>-e..h-~ &-c~ Flfr 33Y8 Lf HOME ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code) (LEGAL ~ESIDENCE) PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS (Screec, CiCy, Zip Code) HOME PHONE ,g8 S~ lo BUSINESS PHONE ~lc,-5)5 J ON WHAT BOARDS ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVING t:dV{'ATI (JV\ LIST ALL CITY BOARDS ON WHICH YOU ARE CURRENTLY SERVING OR HAVE PREVIOUSLY SERVED (Please include d~tes) <C.du ('A \) OV'\ . , EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 1'\ lJ ~.s. I P <1 :D 19 J l:7Y"Y\- P. LIST ANY RELATED PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES WHICH YOU HOLD _Q<e~ ) s. 1~ '1~A. \'1 u~ L, <, f'P ..:?/Y2.C.td J' f\ -FI-R C .~P~c~6l/r1 GIVE YOUR PRESENT, OR MOST RECENT EMPLOYER9 AND POSITION fh.1 r?!T e~~ Nu(UQ' DESCRIBE EXPERIENCES. SKILLS OR KNOWLEDGE WHICH QUALIF~ YOU TO SERVE ON THIS ::rd~A~A~~ b~:m::~JJ~Pr;:~T4~~ PLEASE ATTACH A BRIEF RESUME. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE. AND I AGREE AND UNDERSTAND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICA- TION MAY CAUSE FORFEITURE UPON MY PART OF ANY APPOINTMENT I MAY RECEIVE. -?J;ra &X~ /n//..a..b1/~ ~ 7Jr-/91 SIGNATURE DA 4/90 . ~,L' 3JiJ)qO CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BOARD ~EMBER APPLICATION NAME Kathryn S. Sloan 502 Rye Lane, Delray Beach, FL 33444 HOME ADDRESS (Street, City. Zip Code) (LEGAL RESIDENCE) Kathi SUmrall Realty, Inc. 822 E. Atlantic Ave, Delray Beach, FL 33483 PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code) HOME PHONE 278-3175 BUSINESS PHONE 272-6700 ON WHAT BOARDS ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVING Education LIST ALL CITY BOARDS ON WHICH YOU ARE CURRENTLY SERVING OR HAVE PREVIOUSLY SERVED (Please include dates) None EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Atlantic High School, graduated 1985 Early Childhood Education Degree, University of Georgia, 1990 LIST ANY RELATED PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES WHICH YOU HOLD Florida Real Estate Salesman License GIVE YOUR PRESENT, OR MOST RECENT EMPLOYER, AND POSITION Kathi Sumrall Realty, Inc., Kathi Sumrall, Realtor/Associate AGENCY EMPLOYER POSITION DESCRIBE EXPERIENCES, SKILLS OR KNOWLEDGE WHICH QUALIFY YOU TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD My degree is in early childhood education. I did three months of student teaching in Athens, Georgia and another three , moa':hs in London PLEASE ATTACH A BRIEF RESUME. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE, AN'O I AGREE AJ.'JD UNDERSTAND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICA- TION MAY CAUSE FORFEITURE UPON MY PART OF ANY APPOINTMENT I MAY RECEIVE. ~&,6Y~ ~L~.~ SIGNATURE / OAT ;; 4/90 ".H - , . ~ KATHRYN S . SLOAN PERSONAL BACKGROUND Lifetime resident of Delray Beach Parents: John Nicholas and Rose Machek Sloan, Ii I Date of Birth: May 14 , 1967 EDUCATION Trinity Lutheran School, grades K-8 Atlantic Community High School, graduated 1985 University of Georgia, pending degree EMPLOYMENT March 1990 to Ka t hi Sumrall Realty, Inc., Delray Beach, Florida present position: Salesman Feb. 1988 to June 1989 Coldwell Banker Upchurch Realty, Athens, Georgia position: Office Manager's Assistant Summer 1986, 1987 Wee Care Day Care Center, Delray Beach, Florida position: Assistant Classroom Teacher; infants, Two year old, nursery, Christmas 1985, 1986 Rosella's Bakery, Delray Beach, Florida and 1987 position: Baker's Assistant ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND HONORS Delray Beach Board of Realtors Member January 1991 to Delray Beach Board of Realtors Committees: present REALTOR/Lender Commitee REALTOR/Attorney Committee Civic Affairs Committee Social Committee January 1991 to Cason United Methodist Church Youth Counselor present Autumn, 1989 Paticipant in C.O.S.T. program for overseas student teaching, four months teaching in London, England 1988 Listed in 1988 Edition of Outstandi~g Young Women of America 1987-1989 Dean's List, University of Georgia 1985-1989 Campus View Church, Athens, Georgia Committees Social Coordinator - College Group Children's Songtime Hour Coordinator and Teacher Sunday School Teacher 1985 National Pen Women Scholarship Miss Atlantic Additional references available upon request , >1'" - . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGERt~'l SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #9K ~ MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 AUTHORIZATION TO DISPLAY SPECIAL EVENT BANNERS DATE: August 13, 1991 Attached, for your information is a revised staff report for Agenda Item 9K. Staff has modified their recommendation with regard to the display of special event banners on West Atlantic Avenue and at Pompey Park. Staff recommends that only one banner sign be authorized and that that banner be located at the entrance of Pompey Park. Alternatively, staff has suggested that in lieu of the banners, special events signage be placed in the widows of businesses and in the medians on West Atlantic Avenue. Such signage would be limited to 20 square feet. My recommendation is also modified. Recommend approval of a request from the Haitian Community Center to display a special events banner at Pompey Park and to display special event signage in business windows and in the medians on West Atlantic Avenue. P~d ~aSi-P~~ J~;? uaGL- (~~ ~~) - . MEMORANDUM TO: DAVID HARDEN, CITY MANAGER FROM: JOYCE A. DESORMEAU, OCC. LIC. & SIGN ADMIN. (/~ _.,-, THRU: LULA BUTLER, DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT/~".. (JEROME SANZONE, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL) . RE: BANNER REQUEST FOR HAITIAN AMERICAN PICNIC AUGUST 18, 1991 DATE: AUGUST 9, 1991 ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION: - - This is a request to install 4 banners to advertise a picnic at Pompey Park which will provide information regarding HRS, Planned Parenthood, Aids, Sexual Maladies, legal service, etc. The picnic will be held 11:00 a.m. until 4 p.m., August 18, 1991. BACKGROUND: The sign code per Section 4.6.7(C)(5) does not allow banners other than for grand opening. Section 4.6.7(D)(j) does not allow special event banners. It does permit signs limited to 20 sq. ft. for special events which are of general benefit, civic or cultural, to the community at large. The banners are 64 square ft. The banners will be 4' x 16' and will be installed immediately upon Commission approval. The four banner locations are as follows: l. Mario's Grocery, 1130 W. Atlantic Ave. 2. Peoples Market, 422 W. Atlantic Ave. 3. Undetermined at this date, but also on W. Atlantic Ave. 4. The entrance of Pompey Park RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends just one banner be authorized for the picnic. This banner should be placed at the entrance of Pompey Park. This would emulate banners which are placed at other city facilities such as Cason Cottage and Old School Square for special events. Staff feels the banner size (64 sq. ft. ) is excessive for commercial property, especially compared to the maximum grand opening banner which is 50 sq. ft. As an alternative suggestion, staff recommends window signage advertising the picnic be placed at businesses on W. Atlantic Ave. Special event signs not to exceed 20 sq. ft. could also be placed in the city medians with Commission approval, such as is done for the Delray Affair. lidd~ -1-0 AqEllD A ~ 9.L. .-."" -- MEMORANDUM To: David T Harden, City Manager Thru: William H Greenwood, Director of Environmental~4~ Services Mark A Gabriel, Assistan~rectorof Environmental Services/City Engineer ~ From: Howard Wight, Construction Manager Date: August 13, 1991 Subject: Old School Square (Project 91-62) Paving/concrete/paver Block Proposals for NE 1st Ave zzs-3/t..1- 5SQ - &/. 0r Two Proposals were received for the above referenced project. One from Pavex, Inc., who is currently constructing Project 91-33, the intersection of 4th Ave and 10th st. The other proposal is from Stinson-Head, Inc. , who is the general contractor constructing the Old School Square on-site improvements. It appears that Pavex, Inc. is the' low bidder for the above referenced project at $79,381.50. stinson-Head, Inc. price for the same scope of work is $81,702.50. staff recommends award to Pavex, Inc. in the amount of $79,381.50. Contract to be based on unit price basis for actual work installe~. Work would be awarded as Change Order #1 to Project #91-33. Pavex, Inc. has agreed to mobilize the Project on Monday, August 19, 1991 if awarded the work. This time frame coincides with completion of the underground utilities in thatl;C:: Inc. ----- ----------------~--------~-- R. Howard Wight ~5-0 :rhw ~O~~ . ) WCu..ve." File: 91-620 m~~~ 91-33D A:oldschol.doc q... fu.u.<u..dL ~ t:o Pit u EX U'<..lL ~O~#, 9.L. , . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER:fi SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #: IDA - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 ORDINANCE NO. 49-91 DATE: August 7 , 1991 Second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was deferred at your July 23rd meeting. This is a second reading of an Ordinance amending the Land Development Regulations to provide for commercial activities and businesses upon publicly owned lands as a conditional use in the Community Facilities (CF) zoning district. This proposed ordinance is in anticipation of a request which would allow use of public facilities at Veteran's Park for the conduct of a commercial operation. Although this item is being considered due to that potential land use request, it would also apply to other public lands throughout the City. Alternatively, along with the conditional use request associated with this item, another option has been provided. Should the Commission decide not to approve this ordinance on second reading, the proposed use - commercial boat and ticket sales could be declared a recreational function; and thus, the boat could continue to operate at Veteran's Park. The Planning and Zoning Board at their July 15 meeting recommended approval. Recommend consideration of Ordinance No. 49-91 on second and final reading. CCrJ{J~(Tt l-(tL un '-i to I uc~ ( C'ctPkjLu}G d~D1k/~ ) Ho lC~--G~-L ) CdLI_ CtttCUILLL( f'i\...l.cd./ 'J to. nrL~_ dfuLYYUj~CXDn CJY) OJilf!eJ)[<-j ci m c+l:~-i .-It<.' :7 '" ---.._"-~_.- ---- - . -----"------- _.~------- - ----- --- ~ -- - --------- --- ORDINANCE NO. 49-91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, "ZONING REGULATIONS", SECTION 4.4.21, "COMMUNITY FACILITIES (CF) DISTRICT" , SUBSECTION 4.4.21(D), "CONDITIONAL USES AND STRUCTURES ALLOWED", OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY ADDING A NEW SUB-SUBSECTION 4.4.21(D)(3) TO PROVIDE FOR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AND BUSINESSES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS AS A CONDITIONAL USE, AND RENUMBERING SUB-SUBSECTIONS 4.4.21(D) (3) THROUGH 4.4.21(D) (12) AS 4.4.21(D)(4) THROUGH 4.4.2l(D) (13); PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1- That Chapter 4, "Zoning Regulations", Article 4.4, "Base Zoning District", Section 4.4.21, "Community Facili ties (CF) District", Subsection 4.4.2l(D), "Conditional Uses and Structures Allowed", of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and sub-subsections 4.4.21(0) (3) through 4. 4 . 21 (D) (12) are renumbered to 4.4.21 (D) (4) through 4. 4 . 21 (D) (13) , and a new sub-subsection 4.4.21 (D) (3) is hereby enacted to read as follows: ( 3) Conduct of commercial activities and businesses of a permanent nature upon publicly owned lands. Section 2. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective ten (10 ) days after its passage on second and final reading. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the day of , 1991. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading June 25, 1991 Second Reading . -I ;~ ".</ ,- -', , : . . C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN T A.T ION TO: DAVID HARDEN, CITY MANAGER FROM: (J~)~~TOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 13, -1991 ORDINANCE 49-91, COMMERCIAL USES IN C.F. ZONING ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of Ordinance 49-91 on second and final reading. BACKGROUND: This item was considered at the last meeting of the City Commission but action was deferred pending further review by the Planning and Zoning Board. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at a special meeting held on July 29th. The item was framed to the Board in the following manner: "should such uses be characterized as 'recreational' and not require consideration under land use processing as opposed to enacting the proposed change?" The Board reviewed the material previously prepared by Kathy Stokes and Betty Matthews. On a 5-0 vote, the Board reaffirmed its previous position and recommendation that the proposed text amendment be adopted Le. to add "commercial uses on public property" to the list of permissible conditional uses in the C.F. Zone District. The Board also made the finding that such an action is not inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In a separate action, the Board directed that modifications pertaining the title and the purpose statement of C.F. Zone District be placed before them for review and recommendation to the City Commission. .j-II City Commission Documentation Ordinance 49-91, Commercial Uses in CF ZOning Page 2 . DISPOSITION OF ASSOCIATED ISSUE: WATERWAY CRUISE REQUEST Affected by the decision made on Ordinance 49-91 is the disposition of the request by Stillwater Cruise to operate a sightseeing cruise from Veteran's Park (zoned CF). This item may be handled in one of two ways. These are: ( 1 ) Approve Ordinance 49-91 and then approve the conditional use request which is appropriately before the Commission as sub-item 1. (2 ) Reject Ordinance 49-91 and direct that the item be brought forwarded concurrent with the other modifications to the C.F. Zone District which the Planning and Zoning Board has under consideration. Then declare that the proposed sightseeing cruise boat operation is a recreational activity and as such is allowed as a principal use similar to parks and recreational facilities and other types of facilities which are allowed within the CF zone district. Under this approach no specific land use approval would be required and action on the conditional use application becomes moot. Such a consideration is agendized as sub-item 2. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, act either in line with option 1 or 2. Since there may be legal considerations, given the stated intent of Mrs. Stokes to pursue challenges to actions taken which would accommodate the boat operation, I defer to the City Attorney as to the most appropriate alternative to pursue at this time. DJK/#CCCF.txt <II' . Prepared statement by Kathy Stokes, resident of Delray Beach and Co-chair of the Recreation and Open Space Task Team for the Comprehensive Plan, presented on August 13, 1991 , at a hearing before the Delray Beach City Commission on proposed Ordinance 49-91 which contains an amendment tot he all owab 1 e conditional uses in the CF Zone District. Pursuant to Florida Statute 166 .041( 1 )( c)2. ( phot ocopy at- tached) , the State requires certain procedures be followed for adoption of an ordinance initiated by a governing body or its designee which substi:mt ially changes permitted use categories in zoning districts. In cases in which the pro- posed ordinance deals with more than 5 percent of the total land area of the municipality, there are specific require- ments for the governing body regarding pub 1 i c notice and hearings. If this proposed amendment is approved by the Ci ty Commis- sion tonight, the governing body of Delray Beach wi 11 have fa i 1 ed to follow two requirements of this statute. Further- more, if passed, I believe the Ci ty has adopted an LOR amendment which is incompatible with the objectives and pol- icies of the Comprehensive Plan. If I am not permitted to complete my presentation, I hereby request that this prepared statement, a copy of which I have handed to the C i t y Clerk and copies of which I have already distributed to the City Commissioners on Monday, August 12, 1991 , be made part of the minutes of this meeting. Section 166 .041 ( 1 )( c )2 of the Florida Statutes applies to this proposed ordinance because the amendment substantially changes the permitted use categories in the Community Facil- ities (CF) Zone District by adding the conditional use of commercial activities and businesses of a permanent nature on publicly owned lands. It also applies because the pro- posed ordinance deals with more than 5 percent of the total land area of the municipality. The CF Zone District in- cludes all the recreational areas (except the 1 .4 mi beach, water bodies and the scrub propert y ) , all governmental fa- cilities and publ ic buildings, schools, hospitals and churches in the City. Wh i 1 e it might be argued that the statute should be con- strued narrowly to apply only to the area within the Zone District that is effected by the proposed amendment, I be- l i eve this is an incorrect interpretation of the statute. However, even based on this narrow reading of the statute, this proposed ordinance is subject to the requirements of 11.1' . the statute because the land involved st i 11 exceeds 5% of the land area of the mu n i c i pa 1 i t y . This 5% test is met on the narrow reading because the amendment proposes to add to the CF Zone District the conditional use of commercial ac- tivities and businesses of a permanent nature upon publicly held land. Publicly held land in the CF Zone District in- cludes at least the following: All parks (except the 1 .4 mi. beach and water bodies) Golf course All public schools and grounds Municipal parking lots Fire/police stations Municipal public buildings, maintenance areas and vacant land owned by the City Public utility facilities Courthouse and the County facilities on Congress Ave. Old School Square Furthermore, in situations where a controversy may arise over this or other statutes whose appl icabi 1 i ty is based on land area coverage, the staff report provided by the City's Planning and Zoning Department should clearly ad- dress the issue rather than putting the burden of proof on the citizenry, the City Clerk's Office or the City Attorney. Since Section 166 .041( 1 )( c )2 of the Florida Statutes clearly applies in this case, the City Commission must hold two properly noticed hearings regarding this proposed amend- ment change. The hearing held on July 23, 1991, was not properly noticed pursuant to this statute, and, as further requried by the statute, the Ci ty Attorney fa i 1 ed to an- nounce at that hearing the date, time and place of the sec- ond hearing. Consequently, if properly noticed, the hear- ing tonight would only represent the first of the two hearings required, and the Ci ty Commission may not vote to approve the proposed amendment tonight. While the notice for tonight's hearing represents a significant improvement over that for the July 23rd meeting, it is still a case of "The Good, the Bad, and the Unfort u- nate" (with apologies to Clint Eastwood). "The Good" is the notice for tonight's hearing meets the quarter-page size re- quirements contained in the statute. "The Bad" is that the geographic location map supplied by the Planning & Zoning o i r.ect or for use in the advertisement does not meet the statutory requirements that the map clearly indicates the area covered by the proposed change. The statute requires a H' detailed map because the alternative in lieu of advertising is to ma i 1 notices to each person owning real property with- in the area covered by the ordinance (Sect ion 166 .041 ( 1 )( c )2. c. ) The City's notice for this hearing has a map that contains only the municipality's boundaries ( see attached phot ocopy ) . In contrast, let me show you a notice for a permitted use change published by the City of Boynton Beach that meets the statutory requirement because the map clearly indicates the area covered by the proposed ordinance by highlighting the effected zone district ( see attached photocopy). "The Unfortunate" is that the notice for tonight's hearing is deficient, and as a result, the Ci ty needs to start over again. In closing, I would like to remind you as I stated at the hearing of July 23, 1991 , that, as substantially affect- ed person, I believe that this LDR amendment is incompatible wi t h the po I icy in the Recreation and Open Space Land Use that u[l]and shown under this designation shall not be used for any purpose other than recreation, open space, or con- servation, and I have a right of petition to have an admin- istrative review by the DCA. Even if the City starts over again and complies wi th the notice and hearing process re- quired by the statute, I still p I an to file a petition with the DCA once the City Commission has approved the amendment. .1-1' F.S. 1989 MUNICIPALITIES Ch. 166 to the electors of said municipality a proposed amend. or amended by reference to its title only. Ordinances to ment to its charter, which amendment may be to any revise or amend shall set out in full the revised or amend. part or to all of said charter except that part describing ed act or section or subsection or paragraph of a section the boundaries of such municipality. The governing or subsection. body of the municipality shall place the proposed (3)( a) Except as provided in paragraph (c), a pro- amendment contained in the ordinance or petition to a posed ordinance may be read by title, or in full, on at vote of the electors at the next general election held least 2 separate days and shall, at least 10 days prior to within the municipality or at a special election called for adoption, be noticed once in a newspaper of general cir- such purpose. culation in the municipality. The notice of proposed en- (2) Upon adoption of an amendment to the charter actment shall state the date, time, and place of the of a municipality by a majority of the electors voting in meeting; the title or titles of proposed ordinances; and a referendum upon such amendment, the governing the place or places within the municipality where such body of said municipality shall have the amendment in. proposed ordinances may be inspected by the public. corporated into the charter and shall file the revised The notice shall also advise that interested parties may charter with the Department of State, at which time the appear at the meeting and be heard with respect to the revised charter shall take effect. proposed ordinance. (3) A municipality may amend its charter pursuant to (b) . The governing body of a municipality may, by a this section notwithstanding any charter provisions to two-thirds vote, enact an emergency ordinance without the contrary. This section shall be supplemental to the complying with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this provisions of all other laws relating to the amendment of subsection. However, no emergency ordinance shall be municipal charters and is not intended to diminish any enacted which enacts or amends a land use plan or substantive or procedural power vested in any munici- which rezones private real property. paJity by present law. A municipality may, by ordinance (c) Ordinances initiated by the gov$rning body or its and without referendum, redefine its boundaries to in. designee which rezone specific parcels of private real elude only those lands previously annexed and shall file property or which substantially change RBrmitted use said redefinition with the Department of State pursuant categories in zoning districts shall be enacted pursuant to the provisions of subsection (2). to the following procedure: (4) There shall be no restrictions by the municipality 1. In cases in which the proposed rezoning or on any employee's or employee group's political activity, change in permitted use involves less than 5 percent of while not working, in any referendum changing employ- the total land area of the municipality, the governing ee rights. body shall direct the clerk of the governing body to noti. (5) A municipality may, by unanimous vote of the fy by mail each real property owner whose land the mu. governing body, abolish municipal departments provid- nicipality will rezone or whose land will be affected by ed for in the municipal charter and amend provisions or the change in permitted use by enactment of the ordi- language out of the charter which has been judicially nance and whose address is known by reference to the construed to be contrary to either the state or federal latest ad valorem tax records. The notice shall state the constitution. substance of the proposed ordinance as it affects that 1IIlIIIy.-.. 1. ell. 73-129: .. 1. ell. lIS-95. property owner and shall set a time and place for one 118.032 Elector..-Any person who is a resident of or more public hearings on such ordinance. Such notice a municipality, who has qualified as an elector of this shall be given at least 30 days prior to the date set for state, and who registers in the manner prescribed by the public hearing, and a copy of the notice shall be kept general law and ordinance of the municipality shall be available for public inspection during the regular busi. a qualified elector of the municipality. ness hours of the office of the clerk of the governing 1IIeDry.-a. I, ell. 73-12l1. body. The governing body shall hold a public hearing on the proposed ordinance and may, upon the conclusion 111.041 Procedure. for adoption of ordinance. of the hearing, immediately adopt the ordinance. and relolutlon..- 2: In cases in which the proposed ordinance dells (1) As used in this section, the following words and with more than 5 percent of the total land area of the mu. terms shall have the following meanings unless some nicipality, the governing body shall provide for public no- other meaning is plainly indicated: tice and hearings as follows: (al "Ordinance' means an official legislative action of a. The local governing body shall hold two adver- a governing body, which action is a regulation of a gen- tised public hearings on the proposed ordinance. Both eral and permanent nature and enforceable as a local hearings shall be held after 5 p.m. on a weekday, and taw. the first shall be held approximately 7 days after the day (b) "Resolution" means an expression of a governing that the first advertisement is published. The second body conceming matters of administration, an expres- hearing shall be held approximately 2 week. after the SIOII of a temporary character, or a provision for the dis. first hearing and shall be advertised approximately 5 position of a particular item of the administrative busi. days prior to the public hearing. The day, time, and ness of the governing body. place at which the second public hearing will be held (2) Each ordinance or resolution shall be introduced shall be announced at the first public hearing. "writing and shall embrace but one subject and mat- b. The required advertisements shall be no lell ws properly connected therewith. The subject shall be than one-quarter page in a standard size or a tabloid dearly stated in the title. No ordinance shall be revised size newspaper, and the headline in the advertisement 1007 'C~ - MUNICIPALITIES Ch. 166 F.S. 1989 shall be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertise' (1) The governing body of each municipality may ment shall not be placed in that portion of the newspa. designate its agents or employees as code inspectors per where legal notices and classified advertisements whose duty it is to assure code compliance. Any person appear. The advertisement shall be published in a news. designated as a code inspector may issue citations for paper of general paid circulation in the municipality and violations of municipal codes and ordinances, respec. of general interest and readership in the community. not lively, or subsequent amendments thereto, when such one of limited subject matter, pursuant to chapter 50. It code inspector has actual knowledge that a violation is the legislative intent that, whenever possible, the ad. has been committed. vertisement appear in a newspaper that is published at (2) Prior to issuing a citation, a code inspector shal least 5 days a week unless the only newspaper in the provide notice to the violator that the violator has com- community is published less than 5 days a week. The mitted a violation of a code or ordinance and shall estab- advertisement shall be in the following form: lish a reasonable time period within which the violator NOTICE OF ZONING (PERMITTED USE) CHANGE must correct the violation. Such time period shall be no more than 30 days. If, upon personal investigation, a The (name of local (]Qvernment.1 unlit proposes to rezone code inspector finds that the violator has not corrected (Change the permitted use of) the land within the area the violation within the time period, the code inspector shown in the map in this advertisement. may issue a citation to the violator. A code inspector A public hearing on the rezoning will be held on ~ does not have to provide the violator with a reasonable and time' at (mHl1na clace' . time period to correct the violation prior to issuing a cita- The advertisement shall also contain a geographic loca. tion and may immediately issue a citation if the code in- spector has reason to believe that the violation presents tion map which clearly indicates the area covered by the a serious threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, proposed ordinance. The map shall include major street or if the violation is irreparable or irreversible. names as a means of identification of the area. (3) A citation issued by a code inspector shalf slale c. In lieu of publishing the advertisement set out in the date and time of issuance; name and address of lhe this paragraph, the municipality may mail a notice to person in violation: date of the violation; section of the each person owning real property within the area cov. codes or ordinances, or subsequent amendments there- ered by the ordinance. Such notice shall clearly explain to, viOlated; name of the code inspector; and date and the proposed ordinante and shall notify the person of lime when the violator shall appear in county court. the time, place, and location of both public hearings on the proposed ordinance. (4) Nothing in this section shall be construed to au- (4) A majority of the members of the governing body thorize any person designated as a code inspector to shall constitute a quorum. An affirmative vote of a majori. perform any function or duties of a law enforcement offi. ty of a quorum present is necessary to enact any ordi. cer other than as specified in this section. A code in- nance or adopt any resolution; except that two-thirds of spector shall not make physical arrests or take any pel' the membership of the board is required to enact an son into custody and shall be exempt from requirements emergency ordinance. On final passage, the vote at relating to the Special Risk Class of the Florida Retire- each member of the governing body voting shall be en. ment System, bonding, and the Criminal Justice Stand. tered on the official record of the meeting. All ordinances ards and Training Commission, as defined and provided or resoluti~s passed by the governing body shall be. by general law. come effective 10 days after passage or as otherwise (5) The provisions of this section shall not apply 10 provided therein. the enforcement pursuant to ss. 553.79 and 553.80 01 (5) Every o~dinance or resolution shall. upon its final building codes adopted pursuant to s. 553.73 as they passage, be recorded in a book kept for that purpose apply to construction, provided that a building permit is and shall be signed by the presiding officer and the clerk either not required or has been issued by the municipali- of the governing body. ty. For the purposes of this subsection, "building codes' (6) The procedure as set forth herein shall constitute means only those codes adopted pursuant to s. 553.73. a uniform method for the adoption and enactment of mu- (6) The provisions of this section may be used by I nicipal ordinances and resolutions and shall be taken as municipality in lieu of the provisions of part II of chapter cumulative to other methods now provided by law for 162. adoption and enactment of municipal ordinances and (7) The provisions of this section are additional 01 resolutions. By future ordinance or charter amendment, supplemental means of enforcing municipal codes and a municipality may specify additional requirements for ordinances. Except as provided in subsection (6), not/\- the adoption or enactment of ordinances or resolutions ing in this section shall prohibit a municipality from en- or prescribe procedures in greater detail than contained forcing its codes or ordinances by any other mean.. herein. However, a municipality shall not have the power Hl.....,.-.. 13. CI\. "'261. or authority to lessen or reduce the requirements of this 166.042 l.egislative intent.- section or other requirements as provided by general (1) It is the legislative intent that the repeal by chap- law. ter 73-129, Laws of Florida. of chapters 167, 168, 169. Hlllory.-.. 1. c:II. 73-129:..2. c:II. 76-155:..2. c:II. 71-331: s. I. c:II. 83-240:.. 1. c:II. 83-301. 172. 174, 176, 178. 181, 183, and 184 of Florida Statutes 166.0415 Enforcement by code inspectors; cita- shall not be interpreted to limit or restrict the powers 01 municipal officials, but shall be interpreted as a recogn;. tions.- tion of constitutional powers. It is. further, the legislative 1008 'I .~ -- .- . " -=====a CITY OF. DELRA.Y BEACH NOTICE OF PERMITTED USE CHANGE- -he City of Delray Beach proposes to change the permitted use of land vithin the area shown in the map in this advertisement. The proposed :hange is as follows: 1) Amending the CF (Community Facilities) Zoning District to provide for Conduct of commercial activities and businesses of a permanent na- ture upon publicly owned lands. ~.. .. u . tted use of ;1 sernent. The ~. ..... 10. N. ng District : ivities and licly owned .. . ; the proposed Commission . lray Beach, c. _.I . #" " _..,.._..J . blic hearing The proposal N City Hall, ~... c ~ 444, Phone: 00 P.M., on The City Commission will condud a Public Hearing on the proposed change on August 13,1991, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Commission Chambers at the City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. for the purpose of ra- appeal any ceiving public comment. . a~y matter w1ll need a All interested citizens are invited to attend this public hearing and comment h P7rson (~ ) upon the proposed permitted use change. The proposal may be inspected at' ceedl.ngs. l.S the Planning Department Office, City Hail, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray e upon whl.ch Beach, Florida, 33444, Phone: 407/243-7040, between the hours of 8:00 or prepare A.M~ and 5:00 P.M., on weekdays (excluding holidays). ..... 't . ~.'.. ,. " ...... ~.. .... ~ ~. .. Please be. acMSed that if a p.rson(l) cftIctde8.to appeat anY d8Ci8Iort':~~.'" Y BEACH by the City Commission with 'respect to any matter considered at this meet..;, ..' gor Harty ing or hearing, such person(s) will' need a record of these proceedings, and * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * for this purpose such person(s) may need to. ensure that a verbatim record of . the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence nd the headline upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. . where legal Publish: The News CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Boca Raton/Defray Beach/Boynton Beach. Alison MacGregor H8f.1Y AUgust 3, 1'991 . . City Clertc . .' . A'" """"ot ~"c:. <I ,~ . . tf"" NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PERMITTED "i~~ J ~"j.? r I'''' USES OF LAND ,,,t :': ,:r .. .. . .' '1.- '_. '1'~_ r:t_7f' ." 0, ~_.~ ." .i.: ' '. "~....1:..,t ..... . . "r~ ". - ~ ~~. :~ .J ~ '.' . ':j1i~: . .. I ~. of', , . ~:~ '.. . ... ~ ." before the City Commis- . , A review by the public in ~he City's .. .. , , ~. r ,'"", . '-':',., ; , . , -~ . I . ; ", 1.-, . . . JIl.l; U L J. l' , All interested ", may appear at these meetings l.. .:'. be heard. Any person who .. Commission with respect to to ensure that a verbatim re- record includes the testimony based. - .-...-. 0 ZANNE M. KRUSE, CITY CLERK I ; CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PUBLt;), : .r")ecember 13, 1990 ., A..! ~~~OLt: ." ,. . . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Crl'Y MANAGER t ,"- ( SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #: lo.A. ,~ MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL/BOAT CRUISE OPERATION DATE: August 7, 1991 We have received a request for conditional use approval to allow a boat cruise operation at Veteran's Park. A similar request was previously before the Commission for conditional use approval to operate a cruise operation and ticket sales on the east side of Palm Square, just south of East Atlantic Avenue. The Commission denied that request. Subsequently, in order to assess potential impacts of noise, disruptions, and congestion, the Commission did approve a temporary mooring permit for Stillwater Cruises to operate adjacent to Veteran's Park. The applicant has apparently abandoned seeking use approval south of the Atlantic Avenue Bridge. Thus, the only consideration now before the Commission is that of allowing the use at Veteran's Park. Alternatively, along with this request, another option has been provided. Should the Commission decide not to approve Ordinance No. 49-91 the conditional use request would become moot. Therefore, in order for the boat operation to continue at Veteran's Park, it would have to be determined to be a recreational function by the Commission. The Planning and Zoning Board at their July 15th meeting recommended approval of the conditional use request (5-0 vote/ Beer and FeIner absent), subject to conditions. At that time opposition was heard against the conditional use request. - ~S'-i._CLL.Ld--- Lc)(.-:(,__L C,--.L1 elm!' llL'(' , ,I, (" . [ _, . - ,_L U\. l....) (l 1 .I Ck.l) ~rl-cl' ,r.. - I 1J.~LC.U_Cc.ccC~_(;_ ,Yll/\ .t': . .t '-l.\...."- J MEMORANDUM - TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY ~1ANAGERt7- r SUBJECT' : AGENDA ITEM # IO.A.a - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 ALTERNATE ACTION REGARDING CRUISE SHIP AND TICKET SALES AT VETERANS PARK DATE: August 7, 1991 An alternate actlon has been proposed regarding the cruise ship and ticket sales at Veterans Park. The Commission may wish to reject Ordinance 49-91, which would make the conditional use issue moot, and declare that the proposed sightseeing cruise boat operation is a recreational activity and as such is allowed as a principal use similar to parks and recreational facilities and other types of facilities allowed within the CF (Community Facilities) zone district. IO.H ,J -- ~41+'t r-'11HTf HCTlc, /I - 1\ \CTICll (1C Hj-'P;:(- L.E~) A::.. ':-:~lf-4 12:: 1-\ 1:' (,/ -lilt, ( IJ A ttcr::"-Iif l./ ,.l'- <_I \\1~)c')t-U C Ji <. I ~ <' I l'C1<!:~ I ( il (~F rff J <: II 'S5'C1 0) I ". (~ ~) L t' c..t' (I'SE ~+-c: j"'" ~ " ~--) ~ - I ':.) I -.... t I ElfT - C. '. . lAL! L..ttrl IL~-t, Ju..zl( (\elS/- ll\.,j C {,Cc, (:\fi K.C '--- I - ''--1-<''.' l",octh C"-r f; ,- \..l( /~:jL -<-..6/ <1-. \_.'( (_{_'~':_k-_(_~ c'-.:- ---fl-c ' c' l ,~". ~ \_ l..( /)_ ,ll(\t..U((\ b'l f iL) ):;ft.~" .' -,-_jJ- I 0 MEMORANDUM - TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY I.L'1NAGERll-1 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEUI # 10. fL3 - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 LICEN,SE AGRE2MENT/ISAN CHARTERS, INC. D/B/A STILLWATER CRUISES DATE: August 7 , 1991 The City Attorneyls office has prepared a License Agreement for the operatlon of the Stillwater CL'uise Ship operation aL Veterans Park. There are several major issues which require further direction from Lhe Commission. Those items are outlined in the staff report attached as backup for this 't- l,-em. <III - 11 ~"tt= ~ .~ ~ '[.' !t.",,~ ~~.~ '1' .....' ~..Y .~; ;j;,~:,~~ ';'..;i If )\:,?~:'::;:< ". -- MEMORANDUM DATE: August 8, 1991 TO: City Commission FROM: Susan A. Ruby, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Stillwater Cruise Ship Operation at Veterans Park License Agreement Our office has prepared the attached License Agreement governing the above-stated matter for your approval. The purpose of this letter is to outline some of the major issues requiring further direction by the Commission. In summary these are: 1. Term of agreement: 5 years with a renewable 5 year term vs. a 10 year term. 2 . Method of calculation of license fee: A. 10 year agreement based on Gross Receipts, or B. 10 year agreement based on CPI, or C. 10 year agreement based on Built in Escalation clause, or D. Renegotiate after 5 years with 5 year option to renew 3 . Location of mooring and ticket office. 4. Appropriate time to commence serving food or alcoholic beverages. 5. Use of Park by similar operation. The License Agreement calls for a five year term which may be renewed for an additional five years. At the end of the initial five year term, the parties may adjust the license fees. The initial license fee is $700.00 dollars per month. The fee will commence at the time the City receives a Notice of Commencement of operation which must occur within 12 months of the date you approve the license agreement. The Licensee has requested the 12 month start up period to facilitate the acquisition of the new boat. '1.1< City Commission August 8, 1991 Page 2 The Licensee is concerned with the renegotiation of fees at the end of the five year period and would prefer a ten year agreement. It is our office's opinion that the only sure way of addressing the licensee's concerns with the current agreement language requiring renegotiation after five years, is to enter into a ten year agreement. If the City Commission desires to enter into a ten year agreement, then the City may tie the license fee to a percentage of gross receipts, or the CPI, or set a fixed escalation of the license fee in the agreement. Alternates A, Band C, attached hereto, set forth a gross receipts approach, a CPI approach and a fixed escalation approach, respectively, should you desire to extend a 10 year license term. The County used the Gross Receipts approach and collected $80,000 dollars last year. The proposed cruise ship operation at Veterans Park, however, is a smaller operation and, thus, it is not likely that a gross receipts approach would produce the same amount of revenues as the County operation at Phil Foster Park. Joe Safford, Director of Finance, recommends Alternate A, the Gross Receipts Method. Dane Mark of Stillwater Cruises requests that the City adopt Alternate A. The Agreement permits the City to choose the exact location for the mooring of the ship. The Licensee prefers a location on the south side of Veterans Park. Joe Weldon, Director of Parks and Recreation prefers dockage at the north side of the park. The Licensee feels that the north side mooring will subject the boat to a wake which may make boarding hazardous, and will block picnic table view. Licensee states that the south side location is preferable because it is farther from residential neighborhoods, the visibility from the bridge gives the operation a greater chance of success, and the security of the boat is enhanced by being closer to the bridgetender. Joe Weldon opines that a souths ide location will block the view of the intercoastal from the park. The License Agreement does not permit food or alcoholic beverages to be served prior to fifteen minutes before the scheduled departure of the ship; and states that no docked restaurant shall be operated at the park. The Licensee would prefer a 45 minute or one hour time frame to commence such service prior to departure of the ship. The Licensee is also requesting that no other similar operation be allowed to go to or from Veterans Park. This Agreement does not address this issue. City Cemmission August 8, 1991 Page 3 Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you would like.JE....1isc)S this matter further. C:C;i_~/(,L ___- SAR: el.U \ I - cc David Harden, City Manager Joe Safford, Director of Finance Joe Weldon, Director of Parks and Recreation Mr. Dane Mark - Based on a 10-year Agreement Alternate A - Gross Receipts Method 4.01 Minimum Guarantee and percentaqe Fees: The Lessee shall pay to the City a minimum annual payment of $8,400.00, divided into equal monthly payments of $700.00 per month, or a percentage of gross sales based on the following schedule, whichever is greater: For the first 5 years under this License Agreement, 1 1/2% of the first 1,044,000 in gross receipts, 5 1/2% of the next $456,000 in gross receipts, and 7% of all gross receipts in excess of $1,500,000. Beginning with the sixth year, the rates will change to 2 1/2% of the first $1044,000 in gross receipts, 5% of the next $456,000 in gross receipts and 6 1/2% of all gross receipts in excess of $1,500,000. The minimum monthly payment of $700.00 shall be made without billing, on the first of the month following the date on which the Licensee begins his operation as required by paragraph 5.02 under this License Agreement and on the first of each month thereafter. If an additional amount is due to cover the difference between the annual minimum payment and the applicable percentage, it will be payable at the time the annual report is prepared, no more than sixty (60) days following the completion of the City's fiscal year. Alternate B - CPI The license fee shall be adjusted upward or downward annually to reflect changes in the cost of doing business as measured by fluctuations in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as published by the U.S. Department of Labor; Bureau of labor Statistics of 19 = 100. Beginning in October, 1982, the net change in the license fee calculated for each year of this license agreement shall reflect such increase or decrease in the CPI for the last calendar year, but any decrease shall not exceed 10% per annum. Any . increase which may occur in the CPI is not subject to limitation. Alternate C - Built in Escalation - For the first year of operation, the Licensee shall pay to the City an annual payment of $8,400 and divided into equal monthly payments of $700.00 per month. The 'monthly payment of $700.00 shall be made without billing, on the first month following the date of the notice of commencement as required in paragraph 5.02 and on the first of each month thereafter. For the remainder of the 10 year term, licensee shall pay each year as follows: Year 2 $ 700.00 3 700.00 4 1,000.00 5 1,100.00 6 1,200.00 7 1,300.00 8 1,400.00 9 1,500.00 10 1,600.00 The license fee shall be paid in equal monthly installments. Each payment shall be made without billing on the first month. 2 ~ .1' - LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19 , by and between the CITY OF . DELRA Y - BEACH, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "City") as Licensor and ISAN Charters, Inc. d/b/a Stillwater Cruises (hereinafter referred to as "Licensee"), WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, the City, pursuant to its Home Rule Powers and pursuant to Section 92.15 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, has the power to permit the mooring of boats to any real and personal property which is owned by the City; and, WHEREAS, the City has been approached by Stillwater Cruises for the purpose of operating a cruise boat operation out of Veteran's Park and, WHEREAS, the City believes it to be in the best interest of the citizens of Delray Beach and the redevelopment of the downtown area to allow such operation. NOW, THEREFORE, in order to carry out the purposes of the offer and acceptance, the parties hereto covenant and agree with each other in accordance with the provisions hereof: ARTICLE 1 1.01. Term: The City hereby licenses to Licensee for a term of five ( 5 ) years beginning on the date of the City's re~eipt of the Notice of Commencement of the cruise ship operation as further described in Paragraph 5.02 of this Agreement, the premises described in Article 3.01 hereof for the operation of a cruise boat and restaurant operation as described in Paragraph 1.02. 1. 02 . Purpose: The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the operation of luncheon and dinner and/or sightseeing excursions and cruises from the site described in Section 3.01. The City warrants that this is an acceptable and approved use for this site. The scope of the operation will be limited to the aforesaid cruises, sale of admission tickets for such, food and beverage sales and sale of private charters for such cruises on the excursion vessel. 1. 03. License Agreement: The intention of the parties is to create a license for a non-commercial use of dock space only. This Agreement confers no lease-hold interest and should be construed by a court of competent jurisdiction to be a license Agreement only. ARTICLE 2 2.01. Option to Renew: Provided that there has been no default of the license by Licensee, this license may be renewed for a five (5)'year period, upon the completion of the initial five ( 5 ) years, under such terms as may be agreeable to both the City and the Licensee. The renewal shall run consecu- tively so as to make this license continuous in its operation from the beginning to its termination, a period of ten (10) years. 2 III' -2.02. Title to Improvements: Title to all improvements made and alterations constructed or installed on the premises described in Paragraph 3.01 shall at all times during the effective period of this agreement remain and be the property of the City. ARTICLE 3 3.01. Legal Description of the Licensed Premises: All of Block 132, according to Plat of the Town of Linton, now Delray, on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, State of Florida, containing 4.48 acres more or less. The exact location of the boat mooring, pilings and other attendant improvements within the licensed premises shall be approved by the City. ARTICLE 4 4.01. License Fees: The Licensee shall pay to the City an annual payment of eighty four hundred dollars ($8,400.00), and divided into equal monthly payments of seven hundred dollars ($700.00) per month. The monthly payment of seven hundred dollars ($700.00) shall be made without billing on the first of the month following the date of the Notice of Commencement as required in paragraph 5.02, and on the first of each month thereafter. 3 .4.02. Gross Receipts: The term "gross receipts" as used in this agreement is to mean all monies paid to or in consideration of determinable value received by the Licensee for sales made, transactions had, or for services rendered, in the operation of its license regardless of when or where the order therefore is received, or the goods delivered, or services rendered, whether on a cash or credit basis exclusive of actual bad debt or in consideration of any other thing of value, provided, however, that any taxes imposed by law which are separately stated to and paid by a customer and directly payable by the Licensee to a taxing authority and the sales refunds shall be excluded therefrom. 4.03. Taxes: The Licensee shall be liable for any and all taxes which are or may be imposed as a result of this Agreement. Taxes shall be paid to the appropriate authority, including, but not limited to, sales and use tax. 4.04. Payment of Fees: The Licensee shall pay all license fees and charges and submit all reports required by this License Agreement to the following: Joseph Weldon Director of Parks and Recreation 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 In the event Licensee fails to pay any of the license fees or charges as required to be paid under the provisions of this License within thirty (30) days after the 4 'I,ll same shal~ be due, interest at the rate of one and one/half percent ( 1 1/2%) per annum shall accrue against the delinquent payments until the same are paid. (Implementation of this provision shall not preclude the City from terminating this License Agreement for default in the payment of license fees or charges, or from enforcing any other provisions contained herein) . 4.05. Reports and Records: A. The Licensee shall maintain during the term of this License Agreement all books of account, reports and records customarily used in this type of operation and such records as are necessary to document its activities pursuant to this Agreement. B. Licensee shall submit to the City at its own expense, within the effective date of this Agreement, an annual report as to the correct gross receipts arising from the Licensee's operation under this Agreement. The report shall be prepared in conformance with standards and forms established by the City. C. Licensee shall allow the City or the auditors of the City to inspect all or part of the compilation procedures for the aforesaid annual reports at reasonable times and places. Said inspection is at the sole discretion of the City. D. Any and all records, receipts, and documents related to gross receipts as defined herein of the Licensee shall be available to the City and the City's auditors at a reasonable location in Delray Beach, Florida, for a period of five ( 5 ) years after the end of any license year. 5 . ARTICLE 5 5.01. Facilities to be Provided by the City: The City will permit the use of its existing parking areas adjacent to Veterans Park on an "as available" basis for use by patrons and employees of Licensee. The City will license the premises for the purpose of dock space, ingress and egress to the ship by Licensee's passengers, invitees, employees and agents, over the licensed premises. Such ingress and egress and dock space is to be used at the sole risk of the Licensee. The City shall not be liable for the care or the protection of the ship, including its gear, equipment, appurtenances or contents. City expects Licensee to have made suitable arrangements for safe, sheltered anchorage during tropical storms or hurricanes, and Licensee warrants such arrangements have or will be made. Licensee may not assume that City's premises will be a .safe, sheltered anchorage during tropical storms or hurricane or an emergency. City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to remove or evacuate vessels at the Licensee's risk and expense. Undertaking to move or evacuate a boat shall not be deemed an assumption or responsibility for the safety, security and care of Licensee's boat by City, nor shall City be deemed a bailee of the boat. 5.02. Facilities to be Provided by Licensee: A. The Licensee shall commence operations and provide within twelve (12) months of the City Commission's approval of this Agreement, one shallow-draft, riverboat type of excursion vessel with a passenger capacity of 150 to 250 persons, meeting all safety standards and licensing 6 ,'" requiremeRts of the United states Coast Guard, and capable of providing daytime luncheon and dinner and/or sightseeing excursion. Licensee shall give the City thirty (30) days notice prior to commencement of the operation of the cruise boat. B. If needed, as determined by Licensee, the Licensee will provide a suitable on-site office building. All site improvements shall be at Licensee's own expense, including, but not limited to, pilings, docks, seating areas, landscaping and additional parking area, if needed. C. Architectural and landscape designs shall be subject to review and approval by the City. D. Site plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City. E. Construction shall meet all applicable codes. F. Licensee shall obtain all government approvals, permits and licenses at his own expense. G. Licensee shall comply with all Health Department requirements. H. All equipment and personal property furnished by Licensee shall be of good quality and suitable for its purpose. 5.03. Cl ty Approval: Licensee agrees that it will obtain prior written approval from the City for all of the following: A. Use of any type of vending or amusement machines other than on the vessel or in a building to be constructed. B. Changes from originally approved specifications, plans, signage, buildings, structures, and landscaping design. 7 The City shall be allowed ninety (90) days to reach a decision in any of the above matters and failure to do so within such period shall constitute denial. 5.04. Minimum Days of Operation: It is desired that the vessel be operated at least four ( 4 ) days a week during the summer and fall months and six ( 6 ) days a week during the winter and spring months, weather permitting, and excepting periods required for maintenance and general repair of the excursion vessel. 5.05. Service While Docked: No service of food or alcoholic beverages shall be effected prior to fifteen (15) minutes before scheduled departure of the boat. Except as provided in this paragraph, the serving of food and beverages shall be only attendant to cruises; no docked restaurant shall be operated. 5.06. Quality of Licensee's Services: A. On-site management of the operation shall include at all times such licensed personnel as may be required by the United States Coast Guard. B. Food and beverages sold to the public shall be of good quality and served in accordance with the Health Department requirements. C. The Licensee shall conduct its operations in an orderly manner so as not to unreasonably annoy, disturb or to be offensive to customers, patrons or others in the immediate vicinity of residents or others in the immediate vicinity of such operations. 8 III' .D. The Licensee shall take all reasonable steps to control the conduct, demeanor and appearance of Licensee's employees, invitees, and those doing business with it upon objection from the City concerning the conduct, demeanor or appearance of any such persons, Licensee will immediately take all responsible steps necessary to remove the cause of the objection with the assistance of appropriate law enforcement officers, if required. 5.07. Notification from the City of Failure to Comply: Upon receipt of written notification from the City specifying in detail any failure to comply with the quality standards delineated in 5.06 A, B, C and D, Licensee shall correct the alleged deficiencies within fourteen (14) days, or such greater time as the particular circumstances may reasonably require. ARTICLE 6 6.01- Assignment of the Agreement: Licensee shall have the right to assign this contract to an entity or individual with similar expertise in the cruise boat industry after giving City Sixty (60) days notice of such proposed assignment and after receiving the written consent and approval of city to such assignment. Assignment as referred to above shall include any and all sales, assignment, transfer, collateralization, or other disposition of any and all stock certificates, right, title and/or interest in and to ISAN Charters, Inc. to any person or entity other than Dane Mark. 9 ARTICLE 7 . 7.01. Water and Electrical Services: All connection charges and subsequent billings for water and electricity consumed by the Licensee's operation to be at the Licensee's sole expense. ARTICLE 8 8.01. Equipment Installed by Licensee: A. All equipment, furnishing, signage and on-site advertising installed by the Licensee on the premises shall be in keeping with the appropriate standards of decor of the Parks and Recreation Department and must be approved by the City prior to installation. B. Licensee agrees that all equipment and furnishings provided shall meet the requirements of all appli- cable building, fire, pollution and other related codes. C. Licensee shall not alter or modify any portions of facilities, the leased premises or the improvements con- structed therein without first obtaining written approval from the City. ARTICLE 9 9.01. Maintenance Responsibilities of Licensee; Appearance of Facilities: Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep and maintain the licensed premises including all improvements thereto, free from litter and debris which may result from the operation and use of the cruise ship . The 10 'II' Licensee ..shall maintain all improvements directly related to the cruise ship operation in a neat and orderly condition. ARTICLE 10 10.01. Indemnification: Licensee for himself, heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns, as the case may be, releases, defends, holds harmless and indemnifies the City of Delray Beach, Florida, and its officers, agents, and employees from any and all liability for loss or damage to the boat, its Licensee, and Licensee's agents, employees, guests, passengers, or invitees whether or not such loss or damage is based upon the negligence or conduct of City and from any and all loss, damage, liability, legal action or claim of whatsoever nature, rising out of the Licensee's use of the facilities of the Park known herein as the licensed premises including, but not limited to agents, employees, passengers, and invitees use of the licensed premises for ingress and egress or operation of the boat. ARTICLE 11 11.01. Damage or Destruction of Premises: If the licensed premises or the excursion vessel are partially damaged, but not rendered unusable for the purposes of this Agreement, the same shall be repaired with due diligence by the Licensee from proceeds of the insurance coverage and/or at its own cost and expense, and a pro rata adjustment of the monthly fees payable hereunder for the period of Licensee's business 11 interruption, if any, shall be made. If the damage shall be so extensive as to render the premises or the vessel unusable for the purposes intended, but capable of being repaired with due diligence by the Licensee from the proceeds of the insurance coverage policy and/or at its own cost and expense, and for the period of Licensee's business interruption a pro rata adjustment shall be made as to the minimum monthly fees. ARTICLE 12 12.01. Ingress and Egress: Subject to rules, regulations, statutes and ordinances governing the use of the facilities, Licensee, his agents and servants, patrons and invitees, and his suppliers of service and furnishers of materials, shall have the right of ingress and egress to and from the premises, with such right not to be unreasonably restricted during the term of this Lease Agreement. ARTICLE 13 13.01. Insurance: Licensee shall purchase and maintain insurance providing coverage on an occurrence basis during the term of this agreement as outlined below: A. Comprehensive General Liability or Commercial General Liability Coverage must be afforded on a form no more restrictive than the latest edition of the Comprehensive 12 '1,11 General Liability Policy or Commercial General Liability filed by the Insurance Services Office, and must include: l. Minimum Limits of total coverage shall be [$1,000,000.00] per occurrence combined single limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability, the basic policy to be in said form with any excess coverage (and the carrier) to be accept- able to the City. 2. Premises and/or Operations. 3 . Independent Contractor. 4. Products and/or Completed Operations. Licensee shall maintain in force until at least three ( 3) years after completion of all services required under the agreement, coverage for products and completed operations, including Broad Form Property Damage. S. Broad Form Property Damage including Completed Operations. 6. Broad Form Contractual Coverage applicable to this specific agreement, including any hold harmless and/or indemnification agreement. 13 . 7 . Personal Injury coverage with employees and contractual exclusions removed. 8 . Crew Coverage. 9. Pollution Coverage. 10. Collision Liability. I!. Strikes, Riots and Civil Commotion. 12. Loss Payee Interest May Appear. 13. Passenger Liability. 14. Dock Liability. 15. Additional Insured. The City is to be specifically included as an additional (including products). 16. Notice of Cancellation and/or Restriction. The policy must be endorsed to provide the City with thirty (30) days' written notice of cancellation and/or restriction. 14 >11' . 17. The Licensee shall either require each subcontractor to procure and maintain, during the life of the subcontract, insurance of the type and in the same amounts specified herein or insure the activities of subcontractors in his own insurance policy. ARTICLE 14 14.01. Cancellation by City: The occurrence of any of the following shall cause this Agreement to be automatically terminated: A. Institution of proceedings in voluntary bank- ruptcy by the Licensee. B. Institution of proceedings in involuntary bankruptcy against the Licensee if such proceedings lead to adjudication of bankruptcy and the Licensee fails within ninety (90) days to have such adjudication reversed. The City shall have the right, after fourteen (14) calendar days written notice sent by registered or certified mail to the Licensee specifying the amount of payment(s) in default, to terminate this Agreement whenever the non-payment of any sum or sums due hereunder continues for a period of ten (10) calendar days after the due date for such payments; provided, however, that such termination shall not be effective if Licensee makes the required payment(s) during the fourteen ( 14 ) calendar day period following receipt of the written notice. 15 . ARTICLE 15 15.01- Non-discrimination: A. That Licensee for itself, its personal represen- tatives, successors in interest, assigns subcontractors, and sublessees, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree that: 1. No person on the ground of race, color, national origin, age, or sex shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the sue of said facilities. 2. That in the construction of any improvements on, over, or under such land and the furnishing of services thereon, no person on the ground of race, color, national origin, age, or sex shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subject to discrim- ination. 3 . That the Lessee shall use the premises in compliance with all other requirements imposed or pursuant to Title 45, Code of Federal Regula- tions, Article 80, Non-discrimination under programs receiving Federal Assistance through the Department of Health, Education and Welfare - Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations may be amended. 16 ,I" . B. That in the event of a proven breach of any of the above non-discrimination covenants, the City shall have the right to terminate the license and to take possession of said facilities and hold the same as if said license had never been made or issued. This provision shall not be effective until the procedures of Title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 80, are followed and completed including exercise or expiration of appeal rights. C. Licensee shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment to be employed in the performance of the contract with respect to hiring, tenure, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, or any matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of age, sex, physical handicap (except where based on a bona fide occupational qualification); or because of marital status, race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry. ARTICLE 16 16.0l. Rules and Regulations: Licensee will observe, obey and comply with all rules and regulations adopted by the City and all laws, ordinances and/or rules and regulations or other governmental units and agencies having lawful jurisdiction, which may be applicable to Licensee's operations under this Agreement. City shall not adopt any ordinances, rules, or regulations which are directed toward impairing the City's obligation under this lease. 17 . ARTICLE 17 17.01. Default: Except where set forth specifically herein, upon thirty (30) days notice of any default of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the defaulting party shall cure such default. In the absence of such cure, the nondefaulting party may terminate this Agreement. 17.02. PaYment of Obligations: Licensee shall pay all taxes and other costs lawfully assessed against its interests in licensed premises, its improvements and its operations under the Agreement provided, however, that Licensee shall not be deemed to be in default of its obligations under this Agreement for failure to pay such taxes pending the ''''utcome of any legal proceedings instituted to determine the validity of such taxes. ARTICLE 18 18.01. Inspection by City: The City may, but is under no duty to, make periodic inspections of the licensed premises, and the equipment, to determine if such are being maintained in a neat and orderly condition and are in proper repair. Inspections may also be made to determine whether the Licensee is operating in compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. ARTICLE 19 19.01. Maintenance and Repairs by the City: Should inspection by the City indicate that Licensee is not properly maintaining or repairing the premises and improvements thereon 18 .11' in neat, Sind orderly condition and in proper repair, the City will so inform the Licensee in writing, specifying the deficiencies. Should the Licensee fail, within thirty (30) days of such notifications, to correct or to commence to correct the deficiencies, the city may either make the necessary repairs and perform the required maintenance at the Licensee's expense or terminate this Agreement. All corrections must be made within a reasonable time. ARTICLE 20 20.01- Termination of Contract: The Licensee, within ten (10) calendar days following the termination of this Agreement, shall forthwith remove all of its personal property not acquired under the terms of this Agreement and the original proposal. Any personal property of Licensee not removed in accordance with this Article may be removed by the City for storage at the cost of Licensee or shall constitute a gratuitous transfer of title thereof to the City for whatever disposition is deemed to be in the best interest of the City. The City shall not be liable to Licensee for the safekeeping of Licensee's personal property. It is the intention of the parties to this Agreement that the excursion vessel together with all furnishings and equipment purchased or leased by Licensee, except those permanently affixed to buildings, as defined under the laws of the State of Florida, shall be and will always remain, the personal property of the Licensee. 19 .Upon termination of this Agreement and the removal of all personal property by Licensee, the Licensee shall immediately restore said premises to a neat and clean condition. ARTICLE 21 21.01. Approval: Whenever prior approvals or consents are required hereinabove by either party, such approvals shall be received in writing by the party seeking approval prior to initiating the action for which approval was sought. ARTICLE 22 22.01. Indulgence Not Waiver: The indulgence of either party with regard to any breach or failure to perform any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of the provision or any portion of this Agreement either at the time the breach or failure occurs or at any time throughout the term of this Agreement. ARTICLE 23 23.01- Remedies, Attorneys' Fees and Costs: All remedies provided in this Agreement shall be deemed cumulative and additional, or not in lieu of or exclusive of each other or of any other remedy available at law or in equity. In the event of any arbitration or action at law or in equity arising 20 01,11 hereunder & the prevailing party shall be awarded all costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) incurred in connection therewith. ARTICLE 24 24.01. Notices: Any notices submitted or required by this Agreement shall be sent by registered or certified mail and addressed to the parties as follows: To the City: Joseph Weldon, Director Parks and Recreation Department 50 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 To the Licensee: Dane Mark ISAN Charters, Inc. Stillwater Cruises 200 S. Ocean Blvd. Delray Beach, Florida 33444 or to such other addresses as either party may designate in writing. 24.02. Interpretation: This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties with respect to subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Agreement may be amended only by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and sections headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by laws of the State of 21 Florida. .Waiver of any breach shall not constitute waiver of any other breach. Invalidation of any portion of this Agreement shall not automatically invalidate the entire Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement and three ( 3) counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original to be executed by the appropriate officials as of the date first above written: WITNESS LICENSEE: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA By: MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency City Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH BEFORE ME the undersigned officer duly authorized to take acknowledgments, appeared , , and acknowledged that he executed the 22 foregoing. document in behalf of, and as an authori,~ed act of, said Corporation: SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this day of - , 1991. Notary Public State of Florida At Large My Commission Expires: 23 Prepared statement by Kathy Stokes, resident of Delray Beach and Co-chair of the Recreation and Open Space Task Team for the Comprehensive Plan, presented on August 13, 1991 , at a hearing before the Delray Beach City Commission on the "as- sociated issue" under proposed Ordinance 49-91, list ed as Items 2 and 3, and concerning the Stillwater Cruise Ship Op- eration at Veterans Park and the related License Agreement. The Stillwater Cruise Ship Operation at Veterans Park Li- cense Agreement, as indicated in the recitals of the license agreement, is based on Section 92 . 15 of the Code of Ordi- nances of the City of Delray Beach ( please see the first page of the Agreement). This section provides for temporary mooring permi ts for land owned or leased by the city or which has been dedicated to the pub 1 i c use. This section and the related Section 92.20 ( phot ocopy attached) set the rules for temporary moorings. It is difficult to see how these rules which are measured in terms of hours and days can be stretched to accommodate a license agreement that wi 11 last at least five years and maybe ten. In addition, even if the Commission chooses to base this agreement solely on the concept of "home rule" rather than the Code Section 92 . 15 , I believe that "home rule" cannot be re lied on to approve an license agreement which is contrary to the Ci ty Code and, furthermore, sub- verts the objectives and policies of the City's Comprehen- sive Plan. If I am not permitted to complete my presentation, I hereby request that this prepared statement, a copy of which I have handed to the City Clerk and copies of which I have already distributed to the City Commissioners on Monday, August 12. 1991 , be made part of the minutes of this meeting. Section 92 . 15 provides t ha t , when permission is sought to moor at property which is owned or leased by the ci ty or which has been dedicated to the public use and the time pe- riod sought is less than 6 hours, the City Manager is autho- rized to issue a permit after determining the mooring of the boat will not impede navigation or recreation or otherwise adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare. If the time period sought is for more than 6 hours, the per- mission must be granted by the Ci ty Commission. Section 92.20 states that the time period for which a mooring permit is to be effective shall be determined by the Commission at the time of the authorization of its issuance. The duration fl.1l of any mooring permit is specifically I i m i t ed as follows: .....unless an emergency exception for extentuating circumstances IS granted by the Ci t y Manager or his desig- nated representative, in no case shall any permit be effec- tive for more than seven continuous calendar days, nor more than ten calendar days in anyone year. .. Whether the license agreement is being granted under Section 92.15 or under some generalized theory of "home rule," it is inconceivable that the Ci ty can enter into a license agree- ment which clearly violates the clear wording of Section 92.20. As a result, this license agreement lacks legal suf- ficiency. In addition, simply labelling the boat operation as recre- ational does not make it so. I be I i eve t ha t t he boat opera- tion represents a commercial use despite the statement in Paragraph 1 .03 . of the license agreement that the license is for a non-commercial use of dock space only. The City rec- ognized the commerical nature of the boat operation in its original Pub I i c Notice #91-121 ( phot ocopy attached) for the conditional use hearing "to allow a commercial passenger loading area and boat tic ket sales on publicly owned lands ( Veterans Park)." Furthermore, if this license agreement is for non-commercial use of dock space, one wonders why the City went through all the effort to amend the CF Zone Dis- trict to add commercial activities of a permanent nature on publicly owned lands to the list of conditional uses. As I stated at the hearing before the City Commission on Ju- ly 23, 1991 , I believe that the land use po I icy for recre- ation and open space does not contemplate commercial uses as would be permitted in the LOR amendment contained in the proposed Ordinance 49-91 . As I stated, if the ordinance is passed, I will petition the DCA for review. The alternative approach proposed by the Planning and Zoning Director in the Staff Report for this Commission meeting of declaring the boat operation as a recreational activity is tantamount to the adoption of the LOR amendment as it concerns the boat operation. This alternative approach represents an effort to subvert the land use policy for recreation and open space by labelling t he boat operation as recreational and relying on Section 92.15 and/or the concept of home rule. In short, I believe the LOR amendment and the alternative recreational activity/license agreement approach are both inconsistent wi t h the Comprehensive Plan, and if either is approved, I will petition the DCA for review. I have also reviewed the provisions of the license agreement and find a number of them which are troubling (see attached '1 ,~ Exhibit I . which is 4 pages in 1 engt h ) . The following para- graphs of the license agreement are especially disturbing: 1 .02 . City warrants the boat operation is an accept- able and approved use for this site. 3.01. The licensed premises is the entire park (4.48 acres more or 1 ess ) . not just the dock space. 5.02.8. Permits an office building (rather than a tick- et boo t h ) . No size limitation. 5.03.A. Licensee has right to have vending machines or amusement machines on the boat or in the build- ing tobe constructed. Others with permission. ~I 'II 15 CHAPTER 92: BOATS AND BOATI~G Section boats on the Intracoastal Waterway. ('80 Code, ~ 8-3) Penalty, see S 92.99 General provisions ANCHORI~G AND MOORI~G 92.01 Posting of signs 92.02 speed S 92.15 MOORING TO PUBLIC PROPERTY; 92.03 Mufflers required MOORI~G PERMIT. Anchoring and Mooring It shall be unlawful to tie or moor any boat to any real or personal property 92.15 Mooring to public property; which is owned or leased by the city, or mooring permit which has been dedicated ~o the public 92.16 Refusal to remove boat use, unless permission to do so has been illegally moored to public granted either by the Commission if property permission to tie Or moor a period of 92.17 Mooring permit revocation more than six hours is sought, or by the 92.18 Anchoring in restricted areas; City Manager, it permission is sought tor anchoring per:nit a period of less than six hours, and, in 92.19 When anchoring and mooring addition, a permit therefor has been permits not required issued by the city administration. The 92.20 Display of anchoring and Commission or City Manager shall mooring permits; permit authorize the issuance of a per~it on~y duration after a determination that the ~equested tying or mooring of the boat ~ill not City /1arina create an i~pediment to navigation or recreation, or otherwise adversely affect 92.30 Intent the public health, safety, and welfare. 92.31 Administration ( '80 Code, S 8-23) (Ord. 55-79, passed 92.32 Dockage agreement 9-10-79; Am. Ord. 42-81, passed 9-8-81) 92.33 Dockage rates Penalty, see S 92.99 92.34 Rules and regulations S 92.16 REFUSAL TO REMOVE 90A~ ILLEGALLY 92.99 Penalty MOORED TO PUBLIC PROPERTY. GENERAL PROVISIONS Any person who shall tie, moor, or dock any boat at any point in the public S 92.01 POSTING OF SIGNS. waterways lying outside the main channel of the Florida Intracoastal ~ate:way The City Manager or his designated where boats are prohibited wit~out the represent3tive is authorized to post consent of the Commission or the City signs informing the public of the Manager and without a permit issued by provisions of 5S 92.01 through 92.20 of the city administration as above this chapter. provided, who shall refuse to remove that (' 80 Code, S 8-1) (Ord. 55-79, passed boat upon the order of the City Manager, 9-10-79) or his delegated authority, shall be guilty of a violation. S 92.02 SPEED. ('80 Code, S 8-24) (Ord. 42-91, passed 9-8-81; Am. Ord. 50-62, passed 3-10-82) It shall be unlawful to operate any Penalty, see S 92.99 boat or vessel upon any waterway within the city at a rate of speed which causes ; 92.17 MOORI~G PERMI~ REVOCATION. or may cause waves to damage docks, wharves, seawalls, or boats moored or Any permit so issued by the city tied to a dock or wharf along the administration shall be conditioned upon waterway. Pursuant to F.S. 5 371. 59, the basis that it may be revoked at any this section shall not apply to boats on time upon a determination by the the Intracoastal Waterway. Commission that the boat interferes with ('80 Code, S 8-2) Penalty, see 5 92.99 the public use of those facilities or that the mooring is a pu~lic nuisance. S 92.03 MUFFLERS REQUIRED. ('80 Code, S 8-25) (Ord. 42-81, passed 9-8-81) It shall be unlawful to operate any watercraft with outboard motor or inboard 5 92.18 ANCHORI~G I~ RESTRI~D AREAS; motor not having properly muffled exhaust ANCHORI~G PERMIT. within the city in a manner as to annoy or disturb the quiet, comfort, or repose (A) For the purpose of this section, of any person in any dwelling, hotel, or -RESTRICTED AREA- shall mean any canal, . any other type of residence, or of any harbor, or Lnlet opening directly into person in the vicinity. Pursuant to F.S. the Intracoastal Waterway, but not S 371. 59, this section shall not apply to including the main channel of the Florida Intracoastal Waterway. 'I;H S 92.19 DELRAY BEACH BOATS AND BOATI~G 16 (B) It shall be unlawful for any receiving a permit under this chapter is boats which are permane~tly or required to keep the permit displayed on temporarily being occupied by a person or the subject boat in a manner as to be which a person is using as a residence, clearly visible on the exterior of the to be anchored in the restricted area in boat. The form and size of permit to be the public waterways within the city, as issued shall be determined by the City defined in division (A) above, for more Manager or his designated than a total of 24 hours in anyone-week representative. The time per iod for period unless a permit is received from which a given permit is to be effective the City Manager or his designated shall be determined by the City Manager representative. The City Manager or his or his designated representativp. at the designated representative shall issue a time of issuance, but, unless an permit only after a determination that emergency exception for extenuating the requested anchoring will not create circumstances is granted by the City an impediment to navigation or Manager or his designated representative, recreation, or otherwise adversely affect in no case shall any permit be effective the public health, safety, and welfare. for more than seven continuous calendar These permits shall be refused, or if days, nor more than ten calendar days in issued, may be :evoked at any time, by anyone calendar year, The time per iod the City Manager or his designated for which a mooring pecmit is to be representative, if it is determined by effective shall ~e deter~ined by the the City Manager or his designated Commission at the time of the representativf!, that the owners or authorization of its issuance. occupants of the boat for which the ('80 Code, S 8-28) (Ord. 55-79, passed per~it is issued are in violation of any 9-10-79; Am. Ord. 42-81, ~assed 9-8-81; ordinances of the city, or are, by thei: p.m. Ord. 50-82, passed 8-10-82) Penalty, action or inaction causing or maintaining see 5 92.99 a public nuisance, or a health or sanitary hazard. CITY MARI~A ('80 Code, S 8-26) (Ord. 55-79, passed 9-10-79; Am. Ord. 42-81, passed 9-8-81; S 92.30 INTENT. Am. Ord. 50-82, passe~ 8-10-82) It is the city's desire to provide S 92.19 ~fflEN ANCHORING AND MOORING the ultimate in service, safety, and PERMITS NOT REQUIRED. comfort for all guests at the city marina, hereinafter called the marina. (A) For the purpose of this section, ('80 Code, S 8-40) (Ord. .,4-79, passed "ADJACENT TO" shall mean immediately 9-24-79) beside or only within that distance which does not interfere with or i:npede S 92.31 ADMINISTRATION. navigation or recreation, and which is required to allow for turning of the boat The City Parks and Recreation by wave or tidal action without causing Department is given the administrative damage to the boat or the adjacent responsibility to carry out the terms and property. conditions of this division and to collect the sums of money provi~ed for (D) Private docks. Nothing herein. Wherever the term dockmaster is contained in this chapter shall be used in the dockage agreement or rules construed as prohibiting the anchoring or and regulations for the city marina, it moor1ng of boats adjacent to private shall be deemed to mean the City Parks docks whether or not located in the and Recreation Department. restr icted area. This exception shall ('80 Code, S 8-41) (Ord. 64-79, passed only be applicable as to boats which are 9-24-79; Am. Ord. 108-84, passed 1-15-85) being anchored or moored adjacent to a private dock with the permission of the S 92.32 DOCKAGE AGREEMENT. owner of the private dock. The form of agreement set forth (C) Public docks. Nothing contained hereinbelow shall be executed by each in this chapter shall be construed as person, firm, or corporation using preventing the anchoring or mooring of dockage space at the city marina: boats adjacent to public docks leased to private interests whether or not in the DOCKAGE AGREEMENT restricted areas. This exception shall be applicable only to the lessee of CITY OF DELRAY SEACH public dock spaces. 100 N.W. 1st Avenue ('80 Code, S 8-27) (Ord. 55-79, passed Oelray Beach, Fla. 33444 9-10-79; Am. Ord. 50-82, passed 3-10-82) Phone 278-2841 S 92.20 DISPLAY OF A.~CHORING AND MOORING CHECKOUT TIME 3 P.M. PERMITS; PERMIT DURATION. Yachtsmen must :lotify dockmast'!c ~'f noon on date of departure or ~e The owner or operator of a boat charged for an extra day's dockage. 11.11 [ITY DF DELAAY BEA[H 100 ,,"oW 1st AVENUE DELRAY BEi<CH FLC,HI0,c. 33444 407:'J')-' PUBLIC NOTICE # 91-121 Pursuant to Chapter Two of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, you are hereby notified that a conditional use and site plan approval request has been received for Stillwater Cruises, to allow a commercial passenger loading area and boat ticket sales on publicly owned lands (Veterans Park) in the Community Facilities District on the following described property: Block 132, Plat of the Fractional East Half (E 1/2) of Section 16, Township 46 South, Range 43 East, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 25, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. Veterans Park is located on the north side of Atlantic Avenue, between Atlantic Plaza and the Intracoastal Waterway. The PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD will conduct a Public Hearing at 7:00 P.M. on Monday, July 15, 1991, (or at any continuation of such meeting which is set by the Planning and Zoning Board), in the City commission Chambers at the City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida, and all persons interested will be given an opportunity to be heard. Please be advised that if a person or persons decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpos~ such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S. 286.0105. PUBLISH: Delray Beach News CITY OF DELRAY BEACH July 5, 1991 Alison MacGregor Harty . City Clerk \\\o.~\~ "\ - ~ - q\ . THE E FF()RT A LWA YS MATTERS 11,11 EXHIBIT I COMMENTS ON VARIOUS CONTRACT PROVISIONS of the Stillwater Cruise Ship Operation in Veterans Park License Agreement ARTICLE 1 1 .01 . The term of the license has the potential of running for 6 or 1 1 years because the initial five year term (oy the one lO-year term) starts to run on the date of the City's receipt of the Notice of Commencement of the cyuise ship operation. Undey Paragraph 5.02, the licensee has up to 12 months to commence opeyation. 1 .02 . The Ci ty warrants that the operation of the cruise ship is an acceptable and approved use for this site. If the DCA finds that this agreement is inconsistent wi t h and subverts the objectives and policies of the Comprehen- sive Plan, this warranty could open the City for a claim of damages by the licensee. 1 .03 . If this license is for a non-commercial use of dock space, one wonders why the City went through all the effort to amend the CF zone district to add commercial ac- tivities of a permanent natuye to the list of conditional uses. If this effort was necessary, how can the Ci ty be- l ieve the license is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? ARTICLE 2 2.01. I agree wi th Susan Ruby's observation in her memorandum that the only way to accommodate the boat opera- tor's desire for a 10 year 1 i cense is to enter into a ten year agreement. As this paragraph is currently drafted, it represents nothing more than an agreement to agree to extend the license for five years. However, if the City wishes to yetain the right to teyminate the I icense at wi 11 at t he end of five years, extending the term to 10 years will make that impossible. ARTICLE 3 3 .0.1 . The licensed premises is described as 4.48 acres more or less, that is, the entire par k , wh i Ie Para- graph 1.03 describes the dock only. This inconsistency per- meates the 1 i cense agreement. Also, it is difficult to '1'1' understand that the Ci ty is willing to grant this licensee the potential ability to control activities in the park based on the unclear wOrding of this paragraph. ARTICLE 4 4.01. Since the license fee begins the first of the month following the date of the Notice of Commencement, the licensee has been granted use of the dock ( Or the entire park if Paragraph 3.01 is not struck) at no mont hI y charge for up to 12 months. 4.04. NOrma 11 y a penalty interest provision is in- cluded to encourage prompt payment. The interest rate should be 1 1/2% per month (not annum) or an annual interest rate of 18%. This may simply be a typographical error, but one that is definitely in the favor of the licensee. ARTICLE 5 5.01. The City will permit the use of parking areas adjacent to Veteran's Park for patrons and employees of the licensee on an "as available" basis. The new boat will car- ry from 150 - 250 people (see Paragraph 5.02.A.) which is a larger number than the current boat carries, and more par k- ing space may be needed. Also, there is no indication about how many employee spaces will be needed. In addition, where do patrons and employees park if no space is available? Who makes the arrangements, and where, for the additional park- ing? There is also no provision that Delray Beach citizens attending events and activities at the Community Center will get priOrity parking nor is there a mechanism for enforce- ment. One wonders, too, if the statement that .. [s] "uch in- gress and egress and dock space is to be used at the sole risk of the Licensee" is sufficient to shift the burden of risk from the Ci ty to the Licensee. While Paragraph 13.01.A.(6) calls for Broad Form Coverage by the Licensee, it is probably beneficial to include an insurance require- ment in this paragraph. 5.02.A. Since the Licensee sha 11 commence operations within 12 months of approval of this 1 icense, it is diffi- cu 1 t , if not impossible, to understand how the current boat fi ts in to this agreement. This is especially true in 1 i ght of Paragraph 24.02, which states that this Agreement super- sedes all written agreements between the parties "wi th re- 'I'll spect hereto". There is also a vague, sole reference in Paragraph 20.01 to the "original proposa I . " Perhaps the boat operator is entitled to operate the current boat for as long as he wishes under the "temporary license" at a lower monthly fee, but it is truly unclear. There is no I imi tat ion on the length of the boat. i n- cluded in the Agreement. 5.02.8. This provision permits an on-site office building rather than a tic ket booth ( see Paragraph 1 .02 "sale of admission tic ket s" ). There is no size I imi tat ion on the building. No requirement is made that it fit into the park plan. Furthermore, this license agreement is supposed- ly based on a mooring permit to moor at pub 1 i c property. Mooring cannot, by definition, include permission to bu i 1 d an office building on public property. 5.03.A. This paragraph states that the licensee has rig ht to have vending or amusement machines on the boat or in the building to be constructed. If he wants any other vending or amusement machines ( pr esumab 1 y outside in the park i t se 1 f ) , he will have to ask the City for approval. No where, in any discussions, has any comment been made about giving this boat operator permission to have vending and "amusement" machines in the park. 5.04. and 5.05. These paragraphs raise the question of how the boat will be serviced. There is no access for catering trucks and other delivery trucks to the doc k . Will these trucks drive through the newly improved park in order to de- liver? Wi t h an operation for 150-250 people, one finds it hard to believe that truck drivers will be willing to hand carry deliveries across the park. ARTICLE 7 7.02. Who pays for bringing the utilities to the dock? Again, how can a mooring permit allow for the connec- tion of utilities on public land? ARTICLE 11 11.0l. It is unclear regarding the extent of repa i is that wi 11 be permitted at the par k' s doc k , i .e. , the dock could become a shipyard. Also, one wonders how suppl ies, tools, workmen, etc. wi 11 gain access to the dock through the par k . Interestingly, too, if the boat is damaged any IH' where on the Intracoastal, it can be towed back to the park for repair, and the City will pro-rate the monthly fee ( on an undetermined basis). ARTICLE 12 12.01 This provision gives the licensee ingress and egress over the entire park (i.e., the licensed premises ac- cording to Paragraph 3.01). For a boat with the capacity to carry 150-250 people, one wonders about catering trucks, fuel trucks, and maintenance trucks reaching the dock. This permits the licensee to drive through the park. ARTICLE 13 13 .01 . A . ( 2 )&( 3 ) "Premises and/or Operations" and "Indepen- dent Contractor" need to be defined in terms of this Agree- ment. 13.01.A.( 16) Paragraph 17.01, involving default, provides for termination of the Agreement i f t he licensee's insurance is cancelled. However, the Ci ty would be better protected if Paragraph 13.01.A.( 16) stated that the City would require the licensee to suspend operation pending new insurance. Furthermore, the City should reserve the right to suspend or terminate the Agreement if a restriction placed on the li- censee's insurance policy is unacceptable to the City. ARTICLE 14 14.01."(C)" The last paragraph is probably ,,( C )" even though no letter has been assigned. This paragraph is incon- sistent wi t h Paragraph 4.04 and its interest penalty provi- sion after 30 days. ARTICLE 15 15.01.A. This paragraph includes "sublesses" which are not mentioned elsewhere in the Agreement. Does this imply that subleases will be permitted, and on what terms? ARTICLE 19 19.01. Again, the definition of licensed premises in Paragraph 3.01 makes interpretation of this paragraph ex- tremely awkward. ,~ 'I' () - , '" (t ( ,\...,...}...V- -- . / C-\ . tj ~ / M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER{~l SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # loB - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 ORDINANCE NO. 51-91 (UNIFORM SEWER CONNECTION TIME REQUIREMENTS) DATE: AUGUST 9, 1991 This is second reading of an ordinance which amends both the Land Development Regulations and the Code of Ordinances to provide that the owner, tenant or occupant of each lot or parcel of land within the City, upon which a building is constructed and which abuts on or is within 200 feet of any street or other public way containing a sanitary sewer, shall connect that building with the sanitary sewer within ninety (90) days after the sanitary sewer is available. This ordinance clears up a conflict in the amount of time an owner, tenant or occupant is given to connect to the sanitary sewer system once it is available for use. One section of the code requires connection within ninety days, while another section requires connection within sixty (60) days. The LDRs require connection within sixty (60) days. In order to give the property owner/customer adequate time to connect, this ordinance provides for a ninety (90) day time period in all circumstances. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 51-91 on second and final reading. II." _ --.---.-...-.- -~- ')~DINANCE NO. 51-91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 6, "INFRA- STRUCTURE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY", SECTION 6.1.11, "SEWER SYSTEM", OF THE' LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, AND TITLE 5, "PUBLIC WORKS", CHAPTER 54, "SEWERS", SECTION 54.16, "CONNECTION WITH SANITARY SEWER UPON AVAILABILITY", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY ALLOWING FOR 90 DAYS TO CONNECT TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 6, "Infrastructure and Public Property", Article 6.1, "Design Standards and Requirement.s", Section 6 .1.11, "Sewer System", of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 6.1.11 Sewer System: (A) Required: Sanitary sewers, properly connected with the Ci ty sewerage system shall be provided. In addition to. mains, laterals shall be installed to each platted lot and stubbed off at the property line for future connection. (Where sanitary sewerage systems are not reasonably accessible, individual septic tanks may be used following County Health Department requirements. In such cases, sewer lines shall be laid and capped until connection to a public system becomes feasible and mandatory.) Except as provided for in Subsection 6.1.11(C), it shall be unlaw- ful to construct or maintain any privy, privy vault, septic tank, cesspool, or other facility intended or used for the disposal of sewage. The owners of all houses, buildings, or properties used for human occupancy, employment, recreation, or other purposes situated within the City and abutting on any street, alley, or right-of-way in which there is now located or may in the future be located a public sanitary sewer of the City are required, at their expense, to install suitable toilet facilities therein, and to connect those facilities directly with the proper public sewer, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, within 90 days after date of official notice to do so, provided that the public sewer is within 200 feet of the property line. It shall be unlawful for any person to construct, install, or repair septic tanks or other similar sewage disposal systems in or upon any property within any area described in the following paragraph. , The owner, tenant, or occupant of each lot or parcel of land within ,I the City which abuts on or is within 200' of any street or other I! public way containing a sanitary sewer, which is served or which jl can be served by the sewerage system and upon which lot or parcel a d building has been constructed for residential, commercial, or il industrial use shall connect that building with the sanitary sewer !I within 69 90 days after the sanitary sewer is available to that 'i II . II II !i 'I'll _. - .._~_._- ._._~.._....- building for use, and shall cease to use any other method for the disposal of sewage waste, or other polluting matter. Section 2. That Title 5, "Public Works", Chapter 54, "Sewers", Section 54.016, "Connection With Sanitary Sewer Upon Availability", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 54.16 CONNECTION WITH SANITARY SEWER UPON AVAILABILITY That the owner, tenant, or occupant of each iot or parcel of land within the city which abuts on or is within 200 feet of any street or other public way containing a sanitary sewer, which is served or which can be served by the sewerage system and upon which lot or parcel a building has been constructed for residential, commercial, or industrial use shall connect that building with the sanitary sewer within 69 90 days after the sanitary sewer main is available to that. building for use, and shall cease to use any other method for the disposal of sewage, sewage waste, or other polluting matter. Section 3. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid such deci- sion shall not effect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 4. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 5. That this ordinance shall become effective ten (10l days after its passage on second and final reading. Pi\SSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the _ day of , 1991. MAYOR .~TTEST: City Clerk First Reading Second Reading . 2 ORD. NO. 51-91 M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER~ ~ ' R~ ~ SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM it'~ A- MEETING OF JULY 23,1991 ORDINANCE NO. 51-91 (UNIFORM SEWER CONNECTION TIME REQUIREMENTS) DATE: JUL Y 1'8"', 1991 fll..lOO.t5 r- ~ J ~ This is first reading of an ordinance which amends both the Land Development Regulations and the Code of Ordinances to provide that the owner, tenant or occupant of each lot or parcel of land within the City, upon which a building is constructed and which abuts on or is within 200 feet of any street or other public way containing a sanitary sewer, shall connect that building with the sanitary sewer within ninety (90) days after the sanitary sewer is available. This ordinance clears up a conflict in the amount of time an owner, tenant or occupant is given to connect to the sanitary sewer system once it is available for use. One section of the code requires connection within ninety days, while another section requires connection within sixty (60) days. The LDRs require connection within sixty (60) days. In order to give the property owner/customer adequate time to connect, this ordinance provides for a ninety (90) day time period in all circumstances. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 51-91 on ~a~i~ p~ .5A:J f H 6f1 'i? J3- flU " i./.. . . . """'fl~ OF DELRRY ,;, .,l:QfH .l:: ,,~.';,;, _ - ~ , ti~ . \ "/~i ~~ ,",~ .~, "- '~ 1;'Z.' .r~ ,rH'!", , f" ~f'r ~~ ; .." . Writer's Direct Line .' .,,_~", ,.;J ':~,' (407) 243-7090 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 8, 1991 TO: City Commission FROM: David N. Tolces, Assi.stant City Attorne-#- SUB,JECT: Uniform Sewer Connection Time Requirements This ordinance amends both the City's Code of Ordinances and the Land Development Regulations to clear up a conflict in the amount of time an owner, tenant, or occupant of a lot or parcel is given to connect to the sanitary sewer system once it is available for use. Section 53.011 requires hook-up to the sani tar'y sewer system within 90 days of official notice. Section 54.16 requires hook-up within 60 days, and Section , 6.1.11(A) requires hook-up within 60 days. In order to give the property owner/customer adequate time to hook up, this ordinance will provide for a 90 day time period in all circumstances. DNT: sh Attachment cc: David Harden, City Manager "I' ()RDINANCE NO. SI -'U AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 6, "INFRA- STRUCTURE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY", SECTION 6.1.11, "SEWER SYSTEM", OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, AND TITLE 5, "PUBr.IC WORKS", CHAPTER 54, "SEWERS", SECTION 54.16, "CONNECTION WITH SANITARY SEWER UPON AVAILABILITY", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY ALLOWING FOR 90 ,DAYS TO CONNECT TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 6, "Infrastructure and Public Property", Article 6.1, "Design Standards and Requirements", Section 6.1.11, "Sewer System", of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 6.1.11 Sewer System: (A) Required: Sanitary sewers, properly connected with the City sewerage system shall be provided. In addition to mains, laterals shall be installed to each platted lot and stubbed off at the property line for future connection. (Where sanitary sewerage systems are not reasonably accessible, individual septic tanks may be used following County Health Department requirements. In such cases, sewer lines shall be laid and capped until connection to a pUblic system becomes feasible and mandatory.) Except as p~ovided for in Subsection 6.l.ll(C), it shall be unlaw- ful to construct or maintain any privy, privy vault, septic tank, cesspool, or other facility intended or used for the disposal of sewage. The owners of all houses, buildings, or properties used for human occupancy, employment, recreation, or other purposes situated within the City and abutting on any street, alley, or right-of-way in which there is now located or may in the future be located a public sanitary sewer of the City are required, at their expense, to install suitable toilet facilities therein, and to connect those facilities directly with the proper public' sewer, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, within 90 days after date of official notice to do so, provided that the public sewer is within 200 feet of the property line. It shall be unlawful for any person to construct, install, or repair septic tanks or other similar sewage disposal systems in or upon any property within any area described in the following pal'agraph. The owner, tenant, or occupant of each lot or parcel of land within the City which abuts on or is within 200' of any street or other pUblic way containing a sanitary sewer, which is served or which can be served by the sewerage system and upon which lot or parcel a building has been constructed for residential, commercial, or industrial use shall connect that building with the sanitary sewer within 69 90 days after the sanitary sewer is available to that I . . building for use, and shall cease to use any other method for the disposal of sewage waste, or other polluting matter. Section 2. That Title 5, "Public Works", Chapter 54, "Sewers'~ , Section 54.016, "Connection With Sanitary Sewer Upon Availability", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 54.16 CONNECTION WITH SANITARY SEWER UPON AVAILABILITY That the owner, tenant, or occupant of each lot or parcel of land within the city which abuts on or is within 200 feet of any street or other public way containing a sanitary sewer, which is served or which can be served by the sewerage system and upon which lot or parcel a building has been constructed for residential, corrunercial, or industrial use shall connect that building with the sanitary sewer within 6a 90 days after the sanitary sewer main is available to that building for use, and shall cease to use any other method for the disposal oz sewage, sewage waste, or other pOlluting matter. Section 3. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be Jeclared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid such deci- sion shall not effect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 4. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith be and the same dre hereby repealed. Section 5. That this ordinance shall become effective ten (10 ) days after its passage on second and final reading. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on thi~_the _____ day of , 1991. "-- MAYOR J..TTEST: City Clerk First Reading Second Reading 2 ORD. NO. . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY HANAGER ill J SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # 10 ~ - HEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 ORDINANCE NO. 54-91 DATE: August 7 I 1991 This is a first reading and public hearing on an Ordinance amending the Land Development Regulation~ by enacting a definition fo~ the term "Flea Market", providing rules and regulations governing Flea Mar.kets within the City, and to provide for Flea Markets as a conditional use in the Central Business District (CBD) . As specific development standards are being created for this type of use which may diminish or detract from the owner of such zoned property with respect to establishing a "market" use thereon, two public hearing will be held in accordance with Florida Statutes 166.041(c). At your July 16 workshop meeting the Commission held a discussion relative to the establishment of Flea Markets and Indoor multi-tenant retail uses at the Old AmesjZayres site. The Commission directed staff to prepare an ordinance which would regulate Flea Harkets and indoor multi-tsnant reLail establishlr.ents. That ordinance has been prepared and is now before you for action. The Planning <.J.nd Zoning Board will formally review this item at it's meeting of August 19th and its recommendation will be provided at second reading. ~)C .'.'l(L l <::,-t k.L(\ (~ S. C: _.1.-.)0 ,. _ - k ~r(llLJ ,S'\e k' '7 <..,\ - ffIHf--) IS ()~. ~-IC If I I'T '- j '\ ) K. ~111 L) I..'t u..):":> CCO\\11't IllS c..-,j '\ ~1001 ()C r~ ft l.. I /2[1 JJfi If b{'! t:liltt(C ..J q ; rH..(llj~((J- _ .J.t:A({J._J2~ . '1.1' 0\1{ . \ (1< I . C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER FROM: Q~AC~~~OR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 ORDINANCE -5-5--91: ESTABLISHMENT OF USE AND REGULATIONS . FOR MARKETS 54-<7/ ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of an ordinance which amends the LDRs by adding the specific use of "markets" to the list of conditional uses in the G. C . , P.C. , and CBD Zone Districts. It also defines the use and establishes development regulations for the use. BACKGROUND: The topic of multi-tenant retail operations was brought to the attention of the City Commission through public comment at formal City Commission sessions. The topic was discussed in worksession and there appeared to be a consensus to proceed to consideration of an amending ordinance. Please refer to that documentation for further background. The implication of approval is that the use, "markets", may be considered on a case-by-case basis on any property which is zoned G.C. , P.C. , or CBD. A duly noticed public hearing (adjacent property owner notification) before the Planning and Zoning Board is required concurrent with application to a specific property. Final action regarding use approval rests with the City Commission. DETERMINATION: Pursuant to F.S. 166.041(c), ordinances initiated by the governing body or its designee which rezone specific parcels of private real property or which substantially change permitted use categories require special notice requirements. In this situation, the use of land for markets is not substantially different that uses allowed in designated zoning districts. Further, application of the use will be by a specifically noticed conditional use procedure. However, it may be argued that the creation of specific development standards for this type of use fl.I' City Commission Documentation Meeting of August 13, 1991 Ordinance 55-91: Establishment of Use and Regulations for Markets Ppage 2 may diminish or detract from the owner of such zoned property with respect to establishing a~marke~use thereon. Therefore, it appears appropriate to provide notice in the special manner which is applicable when more than 5% of the land area of the City may be impacted by the text amendment. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION The Planning and Zoning Board will formally review this item at it's meeting of August 19th and its recommendation will be provided at second reading. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approval of Ordinance 55-91 on first reading and a determination that special notice be provided in compliance with F.S. 166.041(c)(2) a & b. Attachment: * Ordinance prepared by others. DJK/#85/CCFLEA.TXT 'j.II [ITY DF DELIAY BEA[H CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 200 NW 1st AVENUE' DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA 33444 FACSIMILE 4071278-4755 iilEMORANDUM 0d.U~ : .i-'.uyust 13, 1991 1'0: City Commi.ssion -t} From: Jeffrey S. Kurtz, City Attorney Subject: Revised Market Ordinance .!\t. tached is a revised copy of the Market Ordinance which is on your agenda lor this evening's ..... ( Item lO-C} The mee(..lng. following aT. Ievisions to the copy of the ordinance in you.I' agenda packet: 1 ) "Whereas clau.ses!! are now included to clearly indicate che Commission's intent on regulating markets in order to protect the welfare of the community. 2 ) The definiti.on of the term ., mar keto " is more broad in ,scope so t.ha t it lncluch;s ~my area where independent merchants are located at individual loca.tions selling new and used items. :1 ) In Section 2 of the Ord.inance, Section {l) (a) was .includ.ed to clearly specify the minimum size specifications which would result in a ma::..ket being subject to this ordinance~ 4.) Section:; 3 and 4 of the ordinance add markets as condi tional uses in the Ge1lf~ral Commercial, Planned Commercial, Cind CBD zoning districts. 5) We l:ecommend increasing the tenant space sizes from a minimulTI of 400 square feet to a minimum of 600 square feet. It is. oU.r understanding that the minimum size of a tenant space in the Delray Beach Mall is 600 square feet. - As a result of these changes, this ordinance should provide the City with the proper regulations to insure that the community's yeneral welfare is protected. JSK:sh Attachment cc: David Harden, City Manager David Kovacs, Planning and Zoni.ng Director Stan Weedon, Planner III --. - ~-- -----, - -.--------- ~ ------- - -. ORDINANCE NO. 54 - 91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, . AMENDING APPENDIX A, "DEFINITION'~ , SECTION 4.3.3, "SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC USES" , SECTION 4.4.9, "GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GCl DISTRICT", SECTION 4.4.13, "CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT", OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULA- T IONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY ENACTING A DEFINITION FOR THE TERM "MARKET" AND BY PROVIDING RULES AND REGULA- TIONS GOVERNING MARKETS WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, TO PROVIDE FOR MARKETS AS A CONDI- TIoNAL USE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL, PLANNED COMMERCIAL, AND CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICTS; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the.Cit;.y of Delray Beach has become concerned with the proliferation of markets, bazaars, and flea market type of retailing, and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has determined that the market, bazaar, and flea market type of retailing may have a detrimental effect on property values and the quality of li fe for the citizens of Delray Beach unless properly regulated, and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach to establish controls over the development of any markets, bazaars, and flea markets within its city limits. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section l. That Appendix A, "Definitions", of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Market: A building or open space, also known as a bazaar, flea market, or by another name, where new or used items are sold from individual locations, with each location being operated by indepen- dent merchants. Items sold include, but are not limi ted to, household items, antiques, rare items, decorat.ions , electronics, food, clothing, and other miscellaneous items. Section 2. That Chapter 4, "Zoning Regulations", Article 4.3, "District Regulations, General Provisions", Section 4.3.3, "Special Requirements for Specific Uses", of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: (M) Markets: ill Description and Applicability: The special regulations of this subsection apply to retail and direct discount sales which are carried out in a market. The type of market which is subject to the regulations of this subsection includes, but is not limi ted to, the following: (a) A retail shoppinq mall which has a qross floor area in access of 10,000 square feet; or . '1 ,~ . - ___.u_ -- -_..- _.--'--~ ---- ---- --' ------ - - ----~ -.,. (b) The operation of retail or direct discount sales in any structure or portion of a structure wherein the access to the stores, stall, or place of business is via an internal court or walkway and the gross floor area of all businesses therein exceeds 1,000 square feet and retail sales accounts for, at least, 50% of the use area, inclusive of pedestrian pathways and aisles. ill Special Regulation Considerations: (a) Traffic: The applicant shall submit a traffic report/study prepared pursuant to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Ordinance, along with the conditional use application which is necessary for uses regulated by this section. The traffic report shall use the highest traffic generation rate which is applicable to retail uses in deter- mining traffic system impacts and shall not accommodate a reduction for bypass trips. (b) Parking: In addition to the applicable parking requirements from Section 4.6.9 (C), uses requlated by this section shall provide at least one additional parking space for each individual business or business space. (c) Tenants Space: Each separate business location within the market shall be allocated a tenant space of not less than 600 square feet. Not more than 20 percent of the functioninq businesses within the market shall have a gross floor area of less than 700 feet. Not more than 40 percent of the functioning businesses within the market shall have a gross floor area of less than 800 square feet. (d) Exception for Special Displays: An exception to subsection ( 2 )(c) is hereby provided in order to accommodate unique and temporary uses which are to be located within the pedestrian ways and aisles. This exception shall allow businesses to be conducted at a cart, kiosk, or similar faCility, provided, however, that such uses shall not number greater than 15 percent of the number of tenant space uses within the market. (e) Architectural Review: The interior of the market space and the facades for each business location or business space within the market shall be subject to review and approval concurrent with consideration of the conditional use application. ( f) Public Information Displays: Displays of public information and community service shall not be subject to these special requlation considerations. ill Procedural Requirements: Conditional Use Required: All uses subject to Section 4.4.3(AA) shall be established only after review and approval pursuant to the conditional use process out- lined in Section 2.4.5(E) of the Land Development Requlations of the City of Delray Beach. Florida. Section 3. That Chapter 4, "Zoning Regulations", Article 4.4, "Base Zoning District", Section 4.4.9, "General Commercial (GC) District", Subsection 4.4.9(D), "Conditional Uses in Structures Allowed" , of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 2 ORD. NO. 54-91 . II-I. - -~,- (B) Flea Markets pursuant to Section 4.3.3(AA) Section 4. That Chapter 4, "Zoning Regulations", Article ~.~, "Base Zoning District", Section 4.4.13, "Central Business Distr-ict", Subsection 4.4.13(0), "Conditional Uses in Structures Allowed" , of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is her-eby amended to r-ead as follows: ( 15) Markets pursuant to Section 4.3.3(AA) Section 5. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction, to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as d whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. . Section 6. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 7. That this ordinance shall become effective within ten (10 ) days of its passage on second and final reading. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and fi na 1 reading on this day of , 1991. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading Second Reading 3 ORO. NO. 54-91 . '1'11 . Prepared statement by Kathy Stokes, resident of Delray Beach, presented on August 13, 1991, at a hearing before the Delray Beach City Commission on proposed Ordinance 54-91. This hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 54-91 which, accord- ing to the agenda, provides for Flea Markets as a condition- al use in the Central Business District, cannot be held to- night. The notice for this hearing is deficient because the map provided by the City's Planning & Zoning Director for the "Corrected Notice of Permitted Use Change" is blank and only depicts the municipal boundaries of the City. Section 166 .041 ( 1 )( c )2. of the Florida Statutes requires that the advertisement contain a map that "clearly indicates the area covered by the proposed change." This is the same problem as the notice for the CF conditional use change earlier this evening. In fact, the map should show all t hr ee zone districts that are 1 i st ed in the advertisement. This approach assumes that the "corrected notice" rather than the statement in the agenda for tonight's meeting correctly states the zoning districts to which the proposed change applies. Based on the advertisements, these three zone districts appear to be the General Commercial District, the Planned Commercial Dis- trict and the Central Business District. The agenda states that "[i]f passed the second public hear- ing will be held on August 27t h . " This is a misleading statement because no action may be taken by the City Commis- sion after the first public hearing for a permitted use change. Action may be taken only after the second public hearing which must always be held. In short, consideration of this proposed ordinance by the Ci ty Commission must start over wi t h two properly noticed public hearings. -...------.- -- -_._--_._----~.----- .>~d:.,..'-. Ir(~,',:" 'n'~E!l.l ; .~ 1 , C l (\, (l<e:rUi:. ~ . , ,. ;vlorr:;;l " ~ ...~ ''', ... 1 ::.~ -:.. ::"., .- o :~l-~- ~ ~ '~'.' } ------ ~ -'./ .i.~-' ; . 1-: ~ (.';;.' r~; ~_. t ~ ~,;'f.' '.1 s'~ 7: , -I 9"-.:t Gentlemen: You have 1 t in your pOT.;C'r to be the fi~st IpglsJative b~dy in ou~ state to confront head-on i:."tn ethlc~31 problem which plagu(~ s e 'j"~ r ecr-,elon of government in 01).r Yle Lion---I rofe::::" to the appe8rance ",f' ~. impro.!.-,rj ety. You missed that opprtunlty on EaY 28th,199l when you unaYJimously rejec ted ~3 res()lution which had been prepared and subJ:'~i ttpd to yrm by the City Attorney a!ter months of research end study. The resolution if pessed l"1"ould have confirmed, e:'l() o:rsL'c hn.1 ~..!pproved two 1nter-offlce'rer:.oranda issued in 1984 and 1985 by f'll",er Ci' Attorney Herbert Thiele l'lhich stated 'l'li thout eq1Jlvocation th1t lt~ \-'79S city policy ""that its officials.emuloyees and members of its bo{~rds" comrdssions and com.:.'n! ttees oUP:ht to avoid even the appear{;n<:c of i~1Pronr~ The effect of your nc't>,'atlve vote on i'Ia;'l 22th 1'J9S net to c':ldorse,confirm and approve Mr.Thi~le's forthright stat8~ent of city rol1qr but to send a message thHt Er.Thiele's position W8S rlO,'1 null nno void anrt not bin~ing . I Hm sure thAt resu,lt ~';nS not i"ltenoedo I believe the re is a sol utlon which should S8 rvc~ to rB r'lOVC and resolve the doubts, fea.rs a.nd misgl vings some of you expres;3cd on May 28th. I propose thet you ask ~ity Attorney J~ffrey Kurtz to C8me bock to you wi th a shortened resolution ,.'hich'1'ril] Simply declare ~d.th~)'}t any nreliminary wordage that "It is the declared pOlicy of this city that i tspub1ic officers en~ employees avoid even the appearance of I iniproprie ty . ,. I A resolution is not a law, an ordinance or a statute.It is in fact a statement by an official body of its point of vlew,de~ermlnatlo or decision. By its very nature a resolution does not prescrIbe any penal ties. The resolution you rejected on May 28th did not include any penal ties for that very reason. The real question on I'iey 28th and again tonight is whether you agree 1"1i th the staten1ent of city policy enunciated in 1984 I and 1985 by City AttYoThtele that I~lray Beach city officials and I emploYAes ought to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. I think that basic question desorves a "YES" answer froi:) the elected leaders of this community. Respectfully subMltLed, ~~ \ IBK:k Judge Irvi g B.Ke dall-Re<t?red) M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER/"r / SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # I~A - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 ORDINANCE NO. 52-91 DATE: AUGUST 9, 1991 This is first reading of an ordinance which eliminates an incor- rect reference in the City's code. Section 52.83 (A) currently refers to DER Regulation Chapter 17-22; the appropriate cite is Florida Administrative Code Rule 17-555. This is simply a housekeeping item. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 52-91 on first reading. ~ 5-0 Pf/ I ;}fJO teL &'/t!l7/9/ C5IJ - III' i!/ /] /..;,~ ~ .;r- -<:' - . ' -"'--. [ITY DF DELRAY BEACH CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ' "II' L-;i .'\\[.,:I.L . [J[,!.lZ..\Y BL\Cl!. FLCJI,lOA 33~-l-l i":\I.Sl\:Jf.r: "';:J":' .2->...;-;~~ Writer's Direct Line (407) 243-7091 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 12, 1991 TO: Bill Greenwood, Director of Environmental Services FROM: Susan A. Ruby, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance Changing Section 52-83, "Backflow Prevention Devices; When Returned; Specifications At the request of Al Monteleone, Superintendent of the water and sewer network, our office has made a change to Paragraph A of Section 52.83, eliminating an incorrect reference to DER regulation Chapter 17-22. The appropriate cite should be to the Florida Administrative Code Chapter 17-555. There is no substantive change in the ordinance. This is simply a clean-up matter. By copy of this memorandum to David Harden, City Manager, our office is requesting that this ordinance be placed on an ~g City Commission agenda. S ci cc Dav id Harden, City Manager..A Al Monteleone, Superintendent, Water/Sewer Network , : .1.1' .. . ~------ ORDINANCE NO. 52-91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CO~I~:rSSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 52, "WATER", SECTION 52.83(A), "BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES; ~iHEN REQUIRED; SPECIFICATIONS" , OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, CORRECTING A REFERENCE TO A STATE RULE; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 52, '''dater'' , Section 52.83(a}, "Backflow Prevention Devices; 'r/hen Required; Speci fications", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach incorrectly references d stu~e regulation; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray BeClch, Florida, in order to rectify this error in the Code of Ordinances, seeks to correct the reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 52, "Idater" , Section 52.83, "Backtlu',,; -- Prevention Devices; When Required; Specifications", subsection 52.83(A), be and the same, is hereby amended, to read as (ollo.....s: 52.83 Backflow Prevention DevL~es; ','ihen Required; ~cificatjons (Al No water service connection t.o any premis8s shall be installed or mair,tained by the water purveyor unless t.he '..;ater supply is pr-otected iJS r <~qu i r...,d by st.ate law an, regulation t 87 E 7 R7 - Reguldl. ion - t:hapter - 11- 2 2 t il:..l~ ,;elm J n_ Code Rule 17-~ .J.nd this subchapter. Service of water to any premises shall be r:iscontinued by the water purveyor if a backflow prevention device r8quired by tile subchapter is not installed, tested, and maintained, or if it is found that a backflow prevention device has been removed, bypassed or if an unp:-otected cross connection exists on the p.t:emises. Service will not be restored until such conditions or defects are corrected. Section 2. That should any section, or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragt:.J.ph, sentence, or word be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be inva lid. ~J...9~ That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 4. That this ordi.nance shall become effective ten ( 10) days from its passage on second anu final reading. . 11;1' - - ---"--- - -.--- PASSSD AND f\DUPTED in rer:Ju 1 ar ses-~, l,:..)n '.In se~l..)n,j .:l ~ ~ .J ~ ,:,d : reading on this the jay ot ~_._._---- 1991- ---- ------- " ,'i ATTEST: City Clel~k--'---------- First Hedding _______._ Second R8dding___________ 2 ORD. NO. 52-91 . .1.11 M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS , FROM: CITY MANAGERZr I SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # la B - MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 ORDINANCE NO. 53-91 (APPEAL OF DECISIONS OF THE BOARD OF CONSTRUCTION APPEALS AND THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT) DATE: AUGUST 9, 1991 This is first reading of an ordinance which clarifies the Land Development Regulations as to the appropriate appeal procedure from decisions made by the Board of Adjustment and the Board of Construction Appeals (Le. , all decisions of either board are final; however, review of any such decision may be sought in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County) . Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 53-91 on first reading. 1.5~ ~ 6/0 p~ ~~?/ql P f1 0/ d ,,0 - ~, ;1' cc If J,dbr, /I1rt:di . 8/13 [ITY DF DELIAY BEA[H CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 20U :\W 1,: ,WENCE . DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 FACSI\lILE .:07/278.47~5 Direct Line (407) 243-7091 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 26, 1991 TO: City Commission FROM: Susan A. Ruby, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Appeal of Decisions of the Board of Construction and the Board of Adjustment -- Ordinance Our office has drafted the above mentioned ordinance to clarify the land development regulations as to the appropriate appeal procedure from decisions made by the Board of Adjustment and the Board of Construction Appeals. Prior to the enactment of the land development regulations, the appropriate appeal from the Board of Construction Appeals and the Board of Adjustment was to the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. The land development regulations, however, require clarification to ensure that this appellate process is followed. Therefore, our office has drafted the attached ordinance to so clarify the land development regulations. By copy of this memorandum to David Harden, ~ity Manager, our office is requesting that this ordinance be placed on the next ~ City Commission agenda. S "" . Attachment cc David Harden, City Manager Chairman of the Board of Construction Appeals Anita Barba, Board Secretary/Liaison ~I ,~ , . ORDINANCE NO. 53-91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY.COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, "ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS", SUBSECTION 2.2.4, "THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT", OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA; BY ENACTING A NEW PARAGRAPH 2.2.4(D)(6), TO PROVIDE THAT APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SHALL BE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT; AND BY AMENDING SECTION 2.2.5, "THE BOARD OF CONSTRUCTION APPEALS", BY ENACTING A NEW PARAGRAPH 2.2.5(D)(4), TO PROVIDE THAT APPEALS FROM THE BOARD OF CONSTRUCTION APPEALS SHALL BE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach, Florida, desires to clarify the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, to ensure that all appeals from the Board of Adjustment and the Board of Construction Appeals shall be to the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, as was previously required prior to the adoption of the Land Development Regulations; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1- That Chapter 2, "Administrative Provisions", Article 2.2, "Establishment of Boards Having Responsibilities for Lan Development Regulations", Section 2.2.4, "The Board of Adjustment" . subsection 2.2.4(0), "Duties, Powers, and Responsibilities" of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be and the same is hereby amended by enacting a new paragraph 2.2.4(0)(6), to read as follows: (D) Duties, Powers, and Responsibilities: (6 ) All decisions of the Board of Adjustment are final. Any person or persons, or any Board, Taxpayer, Department, Board, or Bureau of the City may aggrieve any decision of the Board of Adjustment and may seek review of such decision in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. Section 2. That Chapter 2, "Administrative Provisions", Article 2.2, "Establishment of Boards Having Responsibilities for Land Development Regulations", Section 2.2.5, "The Board of Construction Appeals", subsection 2.2.5 (D) , "Duties, Powers, and Responsibilities", of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be and the same is hereby amended, by enacting a new paragraph 2.2.5 (D) (4), to read as follows: (D) Duties, Powers, Responsibilities: (4 ) All decisions of the Board of Construction Appeals are final. Any person directly affected by the decision of the Board of Construction Appeals may seek review of such decision in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. ~I .," . . Section 3. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 4. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 5. That this ordinance shall become effective ten ( 10) days after its passage on second and final reading. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the day of 1991. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading Second Reading 2 ORO. NO. 53-91 ~I -II - . MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS 1 FROM: CITY MANAGER!}' ~ SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #: \ C - MEETING OF AUGUST 13 , 1991 ORDINANCE NO. 55-91 DATE: August 7 , 1991 This is a first reading of an ordinance amending the Land Development Regulations by adding a new sub-section to provide for commercial parking lots as a conditional use in the Automotive Commercial (AC) zone district. This ordinance follows direction received at your July 16th workshop meeting. The Planning and Zoning Board will formally review this item at its meeting of August 19th and its recommendation will be provided at second reading. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 55-91 on first reading. p~ 5-0 ~ ~ tJ ~/tm~ &Mu; ~r 1St /!Lo.Ll csn ~/c:?7/9 / . ',\/ . I />..,. L - t. ! C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: AVID HARDEN, CITY MANAGER eu>> ~U~ch- FROM: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1991 ORDINANCE 56-91: PARKING LOTS IN A.C. ZONE DISTRICT ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of an ordinance which amends the LDRs by adding the specific use of "commercial parking lots" to the list of conditional uses in the A.C. Zone District. BACKGROUND: The topic of parking use on auto dealership sites was brought to the attention of the City Commission through correspondence from Borton Volvo. The topic was discussed in worksession and there appeared to be a consensus to proceed to consideration of an amending ordinance. Please refer to that documentation for further background. The implication of approval is that the use of commercial parking lots may be considered on a case-by-case basis on any property which is zoned A.C. A duly noticed public hearing (adjacent property owner notification) before the Planning and Zoning Board is required concurrent with application to a specific property. Final action regarding use approval rests with the City Commission. DETERMINATION: Pursuant to F.S. 166.041(c), ordinances initiated by the governing body or its designee which rezone specific parcels of private real property or which substantially change permitted use categories require special notice requirements. In this situation, the use of land for parking purposes is not substantially different than uses allowed in A.C. zoning i. e. automotive dealerships and used car lots. Further, application of the use will be by a specifically noticed conditional use procedure. Finally, the addition of this use does not diminish or detract from the owner of A.C. zoned property from developing such property. Based upon the above rationale, the special notice requirements need not apply. fl,I' . City Commission Documentation Meeting of August 13, 1991 Ordinance 56-91: Parking Lots in the AC Zone District Page 2 . PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION The Planning and Zoning Board will formally review this item at its meeting of August 19th and its recommendation will be provided at second reading. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approval of Ordinance 56-91 on first reading and a determination that special notice is not required in that the proposal does not substantially change permitted uses in the A.C. zone district. Attachment: * Ordinance prepared by others DJK/#85/ACPARKNG.TXT ~, ;11 . ORDINANCE NO. 55-91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, "ZONING REGULATIONS", SECTION 4.4.10, "AUTOMOTIVE COMMERCIAL (AC) DISTRICT" , SUBSECTION 4.4.10(0), "CONDITIONAL USES AND STRUCTURES ALLOWED" , OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY ADDING A NEW SUB-SUBSECTION 4.4.10 (D) (8) TO PROVIDE FOR COMMERCIAL PARKING LOTS AS A CONDITIONAL USE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DEL RAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 4, "Zoning Regulations", Article 4.4, "Base Zoning District", Section 4.4.10, "Automotive Commercial (AC) District", Subsection 4.4.10(0), "Conditional Uses and Structures Allowed" , of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended by enacting a new sub-subsection 4.4.10(0) (8) to read as follows: (8 ) Commercial parking lots Section 2. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective ten ( 10) days after its passage on second and final reading. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and f i na 1 reading on this the day of , 1991. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading :1 Second Reading :1 d II II I, 'I I : I !I 11'11