The URL can be used to link to this page

04-24-90 Regular · CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING - CITY COMMISSION April 24, 1990 -- '"~. 6 P.M, AGENDA Commission Chambers Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. 1. Roll Call, 2 . Invocation, 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, 4, Agenda approval. Action: Motion to approve. ~ 5, Approval of Special Meeting Minutes of April ~, 1990 and Regular Meeting minutes of April 11, 1990. 6. Proclamations: A. Earth Day- April 22, 1990 B, Arbor Day- April 24, 1990. C, Victims' Rights Week- April 22 through April 28, 1990. D. Florida Nurses Week- May 1 through 7, 1990. E. Nurses Day- May 7, 1990. F. National Youth Fun and Fitness Day- May 9, 1990. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. ORDINANCE NO, 13-90: An Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances by enacting a new Section 52.03, "Use of Water from Hydrants" to provide for potable water on an interim or temporary basis from fire hydrants upon approval of the Director of Public Utilities; provides application requirements; and for a minimum deposit fee of $350. City Manager and City Attorney recommend approval, 8. ORDINANCE NO. 14-90: An Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances by amending Section 71.068 "Cost of Parking or Standing Vehicle in Certain Metered Spaces" to provide for an increase of the parking fees in parking lots located east of Andrews Avenue Fire Station, Atlantic Dunes Park, Anchor Park, and Sandoway Park to ,75<; per hour. City Manager recommends approval. 9, ORDINANCE NO. 15-90: An Ordinance amending Chapter 110, "Occupational License is Required" of the City Code by enacting a new subsection to provide that the requirements of Florida Statutes Section 481.201 through and including Section 481.288 and implementing Rules of the Florida Administrative Code, regulating the practice of architecture and interior designed are incorporated into our City Code. PUBLIC COMMENTS 10. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items from the Public, FIRST READINGS 11. ORDINANCE NO, 16-90: An Ordinance rezoning Delray Town Center, a 9,5 acre parcel located between the Albertson's and Shadywood , Agenda Meeting of 4/24/90 properties from POC (Planned Office Center) District to LC (Limited Commercial) District, Planning and Zoning Board recommends denial (6-1 vote) , If passed public hearing May 22nd per request of applicant, -_..-- REGULAR AGENDA 12. APPOINTMENT OF A MEMBER TO THE EDUCATION BOARD: Appoint a member to the Education Board to fill the seat vacated by the resignation of Mike Plum. Seat No. 2 appointment. 13, APPOINTMENT OF A MEMBER TO THE BOARD OF CONSTRUCTION APPEALS: Consider appointing a member to the vacant general contractor position on the Board of Construction Appeals to a term ending April 11, 1992. Seat No. 4 appointment. 14. SHORT TERM FINANCING- WATER AND SEWER PROJECTS: Consider securing a letter of credit as an alternate funding source for Water Treatment Plant Odor Abatement project. City Manager recommends approval, 15. RESOLUTION NO, 46-90: A Resolution amending, supplementing and restating Resolution No, 39-88, by authorizing the issuance of not exceeding $8,000,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds for the purpose of financing certain additions, extensions, and improvements to the City's combined public utility, City Manager recommends approval, 16, TYPE OF SALE- $8,000,000 WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BOND ISSUE: Consider whether underwriter for the $8,000,000 Bond Issue will be selected by the negotiation process or by competitive bid. 17. PROPOSED REORGANIZATION- PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT: Consider approving reorganization for Public Utilities Department which would increase technical and professional capabilities, consolidate work activities and reclassify job descriptions. Net cost to implement reorganization is $50,555, City Manager recommends approval. 18. APPROVAL OF SHORT- LIST AND SELECTION OF CONSULTING ENGINEERING: Approve short-list for engineering services for the Water Treatment Plant Softening Conversion project and authorize staff to negotiate a contract with the first ranked firm. 19. APPROVAL OF SHORT LIST AND SELECTION OF ARCHITECT: Approve short list of architects to design improvements for Miller Field, Veterans and Currie Commons Park and authorize staff to interview these firms for award of contract for this project, 20. CONDITIONAL USE AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL: Consider a request for conditional use and site plan approval to convert an existing single family structure at 206 S.W. 13th Avenue to accommodate a proposed Day Care Center (Little Lee Christian Academy) . Planning and Zoning Board recommend approval. 21. SITE PLAN APPROVAL: Consider site and development plan for a proposed 15 unit, multi-story development, Heritage Manor, to be located at the corner of Miramar and Venetian, Planning and Zoning Board recommend denial. 22, SUMMER HIRE YOUTH PROGRAM: Approve City sponsored, seven week, Summer Hire Youth Program. Approximate cost of this program is $15,000, Funding to corne from various Departments Contingency Accounts, City Manager recommends approval. 23. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL: Approve agreement with the Private Industry Council authorizing the City to be used as a work site for the Summer Youth Employment Training Program, City Manager recommends approval. 24. HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES PROJECT: Authorize staff to reject proposals received on this project and request new -2- - Agenda Meeting of 4/24/90 proposals for the Historic Design Guidelines Manual using a modified Request for Proposals. City Manager recommends approval, 25. CONSIDERA~¡QN OF APPEALING DECISION IN THE NURMI LITIGATION: Consider authorizing the City Attorney's office to appeal final judgement in the amount of $28,500 in the Nurmi litigation, 26. SETTLEMENT OF NUISANCE ABATEMENT LIENS: Consider request from the Estate of Eleanor Wilson to waive interest on unpaid nuisance abatement and water liens and accept settlement in the amount of $2,504.72. CONSENT AGENDA 27. RATIFICATION OF OLD SCHOOL SQUARE BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Ratify selection of members to serve as the Board of Directors for Old School Square as proposed by the membership of Old School Square, City Manager recommends approval. 28, REQUEST FOR VARIANCE: Consider request from the property owner at 140 Harbor Circle for a variance to the City Code which requires the installation of a sewage pump in conjunction with construction of a proposed dock at that address. City Manager and City Engineer recommend approval. 29, CHANGE ORDER NO. 20 CITY HALL EXPANSION: Approve Change Order No, 20 for the refurbishment of the first floor south wing of the City Hall building and for modifications to the lobby/Commission Chambers in the amount of $178,000 with funding from 1987 Utility Tax- City Hall Expansion (Account No. 333-3461-519-60.31) and extension of contract with Sessoms Grice for an additional 120 days, City Manager recommends approval. 30, APPROVAL OF FINAL ESTIMATE: Approve final estimate in the amount of $90,062.72 for completion of the N.E. 1st Street Drainage Project with funding from 1987 Utility Tax Storm Drainage (Account No, 333-3161-541-61.12). 31. APPROVAL OF INTERLOCAL E911 AGREEMENT: Approve interlocal agreement between the City and Palm Beach County for the enhancement and maintenance of the E911 emergency telephone number system. City Manager recommends approval, 32, REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF RENTAL FEES: Consider request for waiver of the rental fees, in the approximate amount of $250, for use of City owned equipment (stage, eight tables and 20 folding chairs) from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, City Manager recommends approval. 33. RESOLUTION NO. 42-90: A Resolution abandoning the right-of-way for Pearl Street and 16 feet of alley located between Lots 1 through 4 of Block 68 as required for the replat of Old School Square property. City Manager recommends approval, 34, RESOLUTION NO. 43-90: A Resolution assessing costs for abatement action required to demolish an unsafe structure at 702 N.W. 1st Street, City Manager recommends approval, 35. RESOLUTION NO. 44-90: A Resolution assessing costs for abatement action required to demolish an unsafe structure at 1021 Germantown Road. City Manager recommends approval, 36, RESOLUTION NO. 45-90: A Resolution assessing costs for abatement action required to demolish an unsafe structure at 902 S,W, 10th Street, City Manager recommends approval, 37. RESOLUTION NO. 47-90: A Resolution supporting Palm Beach County School Board's decision to purchase property located on the corner of Atlantic Avenue and Barwick Road for the purpose of constructing a new middle school. Education Board recommends approval, 38. AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS: -3- · Agenda Meeting of 4/24/90 A, 1990 Street Resurfacing Project- Community Asphalt Corporation in the amount of $216,866,95 to resurface and stripe 29 street~ªnd to construct a 4250 x 5 foot wide bike path along the west side of Homewood Boulevard, Funding is available from General Construction Fund- Resurfacing (Account No, 334-3162-541-60.53) . B. Photographic Supplies- Photoline Supplies, Inc. in the amount of $20,000 with funding from various departments operating budget s . C, Office Furniture- City Hall Expansion- Business Environments, Inc. in the amount $56,080.05 with funding from 1987 Utility Tax- City Hall Expansion (Account No. 333-3461-519-60.31) . 39. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items: A. Commission B. City Attorney C. City Manager -4- '" RESOLUTION NO. 47-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING THE APPROVAL AND ACQUISITION OF THE WEST ATLANTIC AVENUE/BARWICK ROAD SITE FOR THE NEW CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach recognizes the importance of quality education and adequate school facilities in the continuing growth, development and especially redevelopment of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission established the Ci ty' s Delray Beach Education Board by Resolution No. 54-89 and amended by Resolution No. 23-90; and, WHEREAS, the Education Board is empowered with specific duties and responsibilities as defined in Section 3(E) of Resolution No. 54-89, to develop recommendations to the City Commission for forwarding to the Palm Beach County School Board regarding actions which may be taken in support of schools in Delray Beach; and, WHEREAS, the Palm Beach County School Board, by formal action at a regular meeting on April 4, 1990, approved a staff recommendation to conduct environmental studies on a proposed site for the new Carver Middle School which is identified as 28 acres of vacant land at the northeast corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Barwick Road; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission finds the proposed site to be consistent with the Consensus Statement regarding the placement of new schools on "neutral sites", NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Commission supports the approval and acquisi tion of the West Atlantic Avenue/Barwick Road site for the new Carver Middle School. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 24th day of April, 1990. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk 37. RESOLUTION NO. 47-90: A Resolution supporting Palm Beach County School Board's decision to purchase property located on the corner of Atlantic Avenue and Barwick Road for the purpose of construct- ing a new middle school. Education Board recommends approval. Mayor Lynch: Let me ask Dr. Alperin as he is on the Education Board, was it a unanimously approval by the Education Board? Dr. Alperin: This was a unanimously approval. I did not pull this off the consent agenda though. The Interim City Manager: We had been contacted by some residents who wanted this item pulled for discussion. Mayor Lynch: At this stage is there any discussion? Dr. Alperin: I think the concerns is that the residents in the area want to be reassured by the School Board that all considerations for the safety of the children are included in their plans. Ms. McCarty: I think it's probably a good thing to make sure they do. Dr. Alperin: It is to put it in the record that we've request- ed that they consider that. Mayor Lynch: I think that's a fair consideration that we add that to our approval that if it turns out that we are in favor of it that we add to it that we are concerned that all precautions to be taken. Would you like to reword the resolution? Dr. Alperin: I think that you've done it beautifully. Ms. McCarty: To amend the resolution to include Tom's commen- tary. ..'" Mayor Lynch: I have no problem with that. Dr. Alperin: I'll make that motion. Mayor Lynch: Is there a second? Mr. Randolph: Second. Mayor Lynch: Any other discussion? Mr. Andrews: I just wonder if we are going to get one of those blockhouse schools out there. Ms. McCarty: And, oh, also the parking in the fron t . You know like Spanish River has the parking in the front. Just so when they do their design; hopefully, that we will brought into that because I think if they do decide on that site that the landscaping and the building should be on the street, not the parking lot. Mr. Andrews: I think Lula's been exposed to that more than any of us. Oh, here she comes. Lula Butler: We've had some preliminary discussions already and this school is going to be modeled the same as the Omni Middle School. There is no major parking lot for student parking that you see at Spanish River. This is Middle School, students don't drive. This is for staff parking only. Mr. An drews : Where is the Omni? Lula Butler: Yamato Road. Mr. Andrews: All the way out towards the end? Lula Butler: Yes. (o:J) Mr. Andrews: It is a blockhouse. Ms. McCarty: It's not bad looking. Listen, compared to what we've been used to I think it is very nice looking. Lula Butler: But they will bring their site plan to us for input and they will take into considerations what we are looking for. Mayor Lynch: will this land be rezoned? It's in the County right now isn't it? Lula Butler: A portion of it is in the County and a portion of it is in the City so they will be coming in for voluntary annexation. Mayor Lynch: And then we will have control over site plan, etc? Lula Butler: Yes. Dr. Alperin: While Lula is there, I had to leave the Education Board meeting early, were there any other concerns we wanted included in this? Lula Butler: Alice has always had a concern about proper buffering from the existing single family neighborhoods and I've addressed that with them, there is some natural vegetation in there that could be preserved . Alice Finst: The concern is, too, that if the alternate site is chosen, which is west of Military trail, it is our understanding there is some question whether it will be a walking or riding to school. It will be highly dangerous if our children had to walk from our loca- tion to the area within two miles, they would be crossing Atlantic Avenue, they would be crossing Military Trail. That would really be dangerous. And as far as activity on Barwick Road, as far as I know since the bike path has been put in there have been no injuries -3- whatsoever. So I don't think it's a consideration, I don't think it's even worth mentioning. It might almost be a red herring to put it in at this time. Mayor Lynch: Since we've already done the public hearing, we'll give you 30 seconds Dr. Jackal. Arthur Jackal, Delray Beach, I think it's most important that we consider the safety of the children. I am in full accord with the approval of this site, but unless we take care of the safety of the children I don±t know what else we are doing here. It's up to the School Board and I'm only asking the City Commission to remind the School Board, that it's their responsibility and of course it's your responsibility~the welfare of all 50,000 citizens which include chil- dren. This is a dangerous corner. It's going to become more danger- ous. I'm only saying remind the School Board of that fact which they may know already, but be certain that they give us some assurance that they are considering this fully and not make any serious mistake and at some later date there will be people who will regret this. I thank you for your consideration. Mayor Lynch: I think our approval will basically have that in there. Twenty-five seconds, going down. Helen Coopersmith: I think it is great idea to have the school there, but just remember the courthouse they put on Atlantic Avenue, that monstrosity. They didn't come to us with any plans, they came and said this is it. Lula, Jay, can we have any say on the style of the school so we don't have a blockhouse, we have something pretty back there. Dr. Alperin: We just heard that it will be coming. Mayor Lynch: It will come through us for site plan. - 1- Helen Coopersmith: They did that with the Courthouse and then did what they wanted to. Mayor Lynch: I think this is just a little bit different. Helen Coopersmith: Can they do that Herb? City Attorney: There's nobody from P & Z to tell us. Helen Coopersmith: In other words, can they just come in with their own plans and build what they want without asking us what we would like? City Attorney: I don't believe they can do that as to the site planning process, they can with regard to the construction and all the technical codes and all that stuff, they have their own set of stuff. Helen Coopersmith: But as far as the outside, the aesthetics, plus the safety of course. City Attorney: They have most of that in the State Statutes. Mayor Lynch: We are going to move on, I'm sorry there was a public hearing earlier on that. Go ahead and call for the roll, I think. City Clerk: Mayor Lynch - Yes; Ms. McCarty - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes. -5"- CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: ROBERT A. BARCINSKI, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER FROM: STAN WEEDON, ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECT~/ SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1990 REJECTION OF HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES PROPOSALS AND AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK NEW PROPOSALS ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of rejecting two existing proposals for the historic preservation design guidelines manual and authorizing staff to seek new proposa.ls via a revised request for proposals ( RFP) , The City Commission is the acting body since proceeding in the requested matter is a policy determination. BACKGROUND: The City Commission on December 13, 1988 approved the transmittal of an application for a Certified Local Government (CLG) Grant for the development of a historic design guidelines manual for the City of Delray Beach, The CLG Grant Award was accepted by the City Commission on September 26, 1989. The approved price for the proposed project was $9,500 ($4,000 grant and $5,500 City share). The Historic Preservation Board sought proposals and heard presentations of the two respondents at a December 4, 1989 special meeting. The Board chose the firm of Van Horn Gray Associates as their first choice to ~egotiate a contract for the advertised services. The second respondent, and only one remaining, Mylan Valk Partnership was ranked second. The Chair of the Historic Preservation Board along with support staff to the HPB (Stan Weedon, Assistant Planning Director and Pat Cayce, Historic Preservation Planner) worked through three drafts contracts based upon the initial RFP. However, during negotiations the scope of work changed significantly and the Board desires to readvertise and solicit new proposals under a revised RFP. The initial proposal for the required work product by the chosen consultant was $14,600. This cost was modified to $12,700 during development of the second draft contract and again revised to $26,500 during development of the third and current contract proposal. The price fluctuations were the result of modifications to the desired end work product by the Board, Based upon the revised RFP and a desire to bring the cost of the work product closer to the approved expenditure of $9,500, the Board has determined that a portion of the work may need to be performed in-house and that new proposals based upon the revised RFP be solicited, RECOMMENDED ACTION: Reject the two existing proposals for the historic preservation design guidelines manual and authorize staff to seek new proposals via a revised request for proposals (RFP). SW\Design Guidelines\Reject.Txt _ ~__~_.__,____. ____~__.. ._·u ___ CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION I TO: ~YL LEVERETT, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT III FROM: ~ri1.~~~ :~CTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1990 CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST TO ALLOW A LEVEL IIIA GROUP HOME AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF N.E. 2ND AVENUE AND N.E. 4TH STREET. (Personal Growth, Inc.) ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of conditional use request for a Level III Group Home at a site within the RM-10 zone district. The site under consideration is located at the northeast corner of N.E. 2nd Avenue and N.E. 4th Street and is presently the site of a nine unit apartment building with attendant accessory structures. BACKGROUND: There is not significant development history with respect to the site. The P&Z Staff Report, page 1, provides a project description which highlights the definition of a Level IIIA Group Home and the applicant's intent. The project analysis is also contained in the staff report. The staff assessment of the request was that it was appropriate for the area, given benefits to be realized from upgrading of the site and the transitional area of the immediate area. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this rezoning on April 16, 1990. The request was forwarded with the following recommendation which passed on a 4-3 vote (Bridges, purdo and Coopersmith dissenting): "approval based upon a finding that, in accordance wi th Policy A-6.2 of the Housing Element, the use of the site is such a manner that will aid in the stabilization of the area; and upon a finding of general compliance with the standards for evaluating a conditional use request as set forth in Section 173.848(B), subject to conditions as listed in the Planning and Zoning Board staff report and with the further condition that the permitted residents be female only. " The following expressions, comments, and positions were put forth by Board Members with respect to the recommendation: Schneider: the existing condition of the site is a supporting factor for approval in that upgrading will be achieved Coopersmith: did not agree that it was appropriate for the area Klarer: support for Mr. Schneider's view point and noted that the clientele are of a vOluntary nature Schmidt: felt that the area was transitional in nature and doubted that after it was established that it would have any impact at all. Noted that if the facility were proposed more within the Del Ida neighborhood that he might view it differently. City Commission Documentation Meeting of April 24, 1990 Consideration of a Conditional Use Request to Allow a Level IIIA Group Home at the Northeast Corner of N.E. 2nd Avenue and N.E. 4th Street (Personal Group, I nc. ) Page 2 purdo: disagreed with locating such a facility in Pineapple Grove and felt a better use of the site would be for an office building which would bring activity to the area; he would support a more positive use for the site. The Board heard testimony In support from the proj ect I s representative and in opposition by Mary Lou Jamison who represented the Del Ida Homeowners Group. In addition, there has been one letter received in support and one in opposition from property owners who received notice of the hearing. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CONSIDERATION: A Certificate of Appropriateness is required. The Historic Preservation Board is to consider the C.O.A. at its meeting of April 20th. If granted, no action is necessary by the C~ty Commission. If denied, the applicant may seek reversal through an appeal. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approval of the requested conditional use request pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board. Attachments: * P&Z Staff Report of April 16, 1990 REF/DJK#60/CCGROUP,TXT C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: ~E~~~ISTRATIVE ASSISTANT III FROM: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1990 CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST TO ALLOW A DAY CARE AT 206 S.W. 13TH AVENUE (Little Lee Christian Academy) ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of conditional use request for a day care in a R1-A zoning district. The facility will have a maximum of 52 children. The site under consideration is located on S.W. 13th Avenue just north of Carver Middle School. BACKGROUND: There is no development history of the site nor has there been recent development activity in the area. The request involves conversion of an existing home to a day care facility which will be capable of accommodating 52 children. The request is straight forward and complies with land development codes. Please refer to the P&Z Staff Report (copy in the City Manager's Office) for complete background and analysis. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this rezoning on April 16, 1990. There was no public comment. The request was forwarded with a recommendation of approval sUbject to conditions as set forth in the staff report. The recommendation was unanimous. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approval of the requested conditional use request pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board. Attachments: * Cover sheet from the P&Z Staff Report of April 16, 1990 * Reduction of site plan DJK/#61/cCLEE.TXT C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: ÇJL ~EVERETT' ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT III r) AJ ~ ..cJ FROM: D D J, KOVACS, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1990 CONSIDERATION OF A SITE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 15 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VENETIAN AND MIRAMAR DRIVES (Heritage Manor) ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of a site and development plan for a one acre parcel which is zoned RM-15. The plan depicts a 15 unit condominium complex. The site is located at the southeast corner of Venetian and Miramar Drives. BACKGROUND: This site was originally purchased by the City in 1971 as a fire station site. In 1988, a decision was made not to locate the fire station at this location but, rather, to sell the property under its current zoning (RM-15) and to dedicate the proceeds to the construction of Fire Station #2 on Andrews Avenue. Such a sale was consummated in March, 1990. The proposed development complies with land development codes and consists of a structure with one level of parking and four levels of residential use. The unit count complies with the current zoning. While the unit count exceeds that allowed by the Comprehensive Plan, the application has been processed since the use (multiple family) is accommodated by the Future Land Use Map and the matter of limiting the density is to be addressed in the overall revisions to the Local Development Regulations (LDRs). Please refer to the Planning and Zoning Staff Report for a complete description of the project and its analysis. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board considered this site plan at a regular meeting held on April 16, 1990. There was public comment in opposition voiced by Betty Matthews who questioned its compatibility with an adjacent single story development. Douglas Brown of 123 Venetian Drive spoke in opposition of a 4-5 story structure. Mr. Seddorf, owner of property on Venetian Drive, also spoke in opposition. The request was forwarded with a recommendation of denial based upon the project being incompatible with adjacent land use (Standard J) and being out of scale with the character of the area in terms of height and intensity (Standard B). The Board's recommendation was made via the failure (on a 1-6 vote) of a motion for approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, denial of the requested site and development plan pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board. Attachments: * The P&Z Staff Report of April 16, 1990 MEMORANDUM TO: Robert A. Barcinski Acting City Manager FROM: William H. Greenwood Director of Public utilities SUBJECT: RFQ, WATER TREATMENT PLANT CONVERSION TO LIME SOFTENING - SELECTION PROCEDURE PUBLIC UTILITIES PROJECT 90-43 DATE: April 5, 1990 ... We are pleased to report that the City received twelve responses on the above referenced projects. Attached is a listing of the consulting engineers who have responded to the RFQ. Also at- tached are copies of the consultants submittals. The six (6) member selection committee approved by Interim City Manàger, Malcolm Bird is as follows: 1- Joe Hancock, Director of utilities, Boca Raton 2. John Guidry, Director of Utilities, Boynton Beach 3. Bevin Beaudea, Director of utilities, Palm Beach County 4. William Greenwood, Director of Utilities, Delray Beach 5. Larry Martin, Deputy Director of utilities, Delray Beach 6. Robert Barcinski, Acting City Manager, Delray Beach The selection committee will be meeting on April 10 1990 to review the responses to the RFQ and to prepare a short list. Firms short listed will then be interviewed by the selection committee. The selection committee will then prepare a ranking of the short listed firms which will be presented to City Commis- sion to review on April 24, 1990. Proposed agenda item will include a request to accept the selection committee's ranking and a request to authorize staff to enter into contract negotiations with the first ranked firm. If negotiations break down, author- ization to negotiate with the second ranked firm and if necessary the third ranked firm. The final negotiated contract will then be submitted to the City Commission for review and approval during May 1990. ~1k1€~1UA- _.f William H. Greenwood WHG: j 0 cc: Joe Hancock, Director of utilities, Boca Raton John Guidry, Director of utilities, Boynton Beach Bevin Beaudea, Director of utilities, Palm Beach County Larry Martin, Deputy Director of utilities, Delray Beach Ted Glas, Director of Purchasing Allison MacGregor, city Clerk ,< f r I I " ! C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOCUMENTATION TO: ~~R~~' ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT III FROM: DAV J. KOVACS~CTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1990 CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING FROM P.O.C. TO L.C. FOR A PORTION OF DELRAY TOWN CENTER (LINTON @ MILITARY) ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval on first reading of a rezoning ordinance. This action simply means that the item will proceed to consideration of 2nd reading at a public hearing. The purpose of first reading consideration is to: a) establish the title of the ordinance for publication b) provide an opportunity for the Commission to become familiar with the request and to identify what additional information, if any, may be desired prior to second reading consideration. The site under consideration is approximately 10 acres and is located between the Albertson's portion of the center and the Shadywood's residential area to the east. BACKGROUND: This development has a very long and stormy history. Please refer to the chronology of events which .is contained in the Planning and Zoning Board staff report. Your attention is also drawn to the write up of the project description (page 4 ) , the applicant's justification statement (attachment to the report) , and a discussion of other items of significance which is found on page 9 of the report. In addition to the above information and the analysis contained in the staff report, there are several letters in opposition to the requested rezoning (these will be provided as a part of the public hearing material) and petition of opposition. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this rezoning on April 16, 1990. The request was forwarded with the following recommendation which passed on a 6-1 vote (Parker dissenting) : "denial based upon a determination that the LC District will accommodate usage which is intensive than that allowed by POC zoning in terms of usage extending into evening hours, an overall increase in average daily i:raffic ( ADT) , and -3. greater range of uses - some of which may be in appropriate in proximity to the existing residential area to the east." The following expressions, comments, and positions were put forth by Board Members with respect to the recommendation: Schneider: the choice of zoning is either LC or POC, felt that LC has unacceptable impacts Bridges: does not see the need to accommodate additional retail land use - City Commission Documentation Meeting of April 24, 1990 Consideration of a Rezoning from POC to LC for a Portion of Delray Town Center (Linton & Military) Page 2 Coopersmith: felt it appropriate to side with the community Klarer: felt that the previous history showed POC zoning and use to be preferable to LC zoning and retail usage at this site. The Board heard extensive public testimony from both the project's representative and those in opposition to the requested change of zoning. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approval of the enacting ordinance on first reading and set a public hearing date of May 22, 1990, for second reading consideration. Attachments: * P&Z Staff Report of April 16, 1990 REF/DJK#60/CCGROUP.TXT F=-"LANN 1 f\JG 8. ZON 1 NG uûHHO _ _ _ STAFF REPORT _ _ _ CITY OF OELRAY BEACH MEETING OOTE: April 16, 1990 AGe.œ ITEM: IILA. IT~u- Delray Town Center Rezoning, POC to LC, Approximately 10 Acres in the Northeast O~· rO""~Qr nf Military Tr;::¡il ;:¡nn T,inrnn Rn111pvRrn 32-68) .- ._--1- Lit:' , .. ~ . --~ ~ -, . .. 41 ~ ;. = ~,~., t..... ~ ....,. ~ ~ ". ~ ,. "...~ :..., I .., :.;--p~: ..:' ~ . ~ ...øGT... "'. , ,'::'{ r.:- s.~Yjr.Q~·:- ·~l ..' J f -' ~ ~AS£-..M l .,' , ~-1E-~~~t~·: ,.:-~ ,. . ., s .. =~..,~:. . ..... ,-.- .~T_ N ..... ~ a.'ST 0 .7 . J .......- ~ø 1iI'1If~ .v.... "..'! ® ~'~'~""~t~ ',ø'~'..'.'.~.n 1', - - "~ . _ _ -C..: ~_ .. ~_ -, -. " : . : " :7.. ~ I GENERAL DATA: Owner..,........................Anthony V. Pugliese, III Agent...........,...............Robert E. Basehart Location..................... ...North side of Linton Boulevard, approximately 680 ft. east of Military Trail. Property Size..,............. ...9.962 Acres City Land Use Plan,.",.........Transitional Commercial City Zoni~g.................. ...POC (Planned Office Center) Proposed Zoning..."...........,LC (Limited Commercial) Adjacent Zoning....,............North of the subject property is zoned R-lAA (Single Family DIstrict) and SAD (Special Activities District), East is RM-6 (Multiple Family DIstrict). South is p~C, and West is zoned lC {Limited Commercial). Existing Land Use..... ...."....Vacant Proposed Land Use.... .,., .,...' ,,6,2~0 sq. ft, retail shopping centcl' Watel Sel-vlce...,.....",."", ,'::., ccr.nectlon to the W' \-Iate! ¡,1,,:r: ',,'lthu1 Dc1r"af TO'yJ[: Center Phase I anà ccnnecting to the 10" n;¡;:~: èocatcè on Llnton Bouleval'à, :~"'~'el Sel 'lIce.........,."""" :";c:"; 'C (0 be Pl-o'lided bf ":.:: "::'òlon ot 5" sanitarj' sewer : l;'" :;hadywoons, Agenda Item: lILA, ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The action requested of the Board is that of a making a recommendation to the City Commission on a rezoning request from Planned Office Center (POC) to Limited Commercial ( LC) , The property in question is approximately 10 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Linton Boulevard and Military Trail and situated between the Albertson's portion of Delray Town Center and the Shadywood residential development. The process and criteria for decision making is found in Sections 173.885 through 173.889, inclusive. BACKGROUND: The development history of this property has been very controversial. At present site work is underway for the ten acre site at the intersection of Military Trail and Linton. A 101,000 sq. ft. retail center is under construction with Albertson's being, the primary tenant. Associated with that construction is the! present excavation of a drainage (lake) facility adjacent to' Shadywoods and a full entry to the center from Linton Boulevard.' This full entry is situated on the specific parcel which is under consideration in the rezoning action, Following is a chronology of events which have lead to the current petition: * 1985/86 - A Land Use Amendment request (SF to C) and concurrent rezoning request (R-1AA to GC and POC) were processed, Also, a site and development plan for the Delray Town Center (87,990 square feet) of retail and for the Delray Town Center Executive Plaza (98,950 square feet) was processed, * July 8, 1986 - The Planning and Zoning Board on a 4-3 vote recommended denial of the plan amendment and rezoning petition. * November 3, 1986 - The Planning and Zoning Board failed to provide a recommendation on the site and development plan (3-3 vote) . The site plans had two components, the retail project and the office park, * November 25, 1986 - A Modified Plan Amendment (C and POI) and modified rezoning petition (LC and POC), along with the site and development, was approved by the City Commission (4-1 vote). * June, 1987 - An amendment to the Land Use Map to affix C designation instead of the POI designation on the eastern portion of the site was submitted. P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 2 * August 24, 1987 - A Site Plan Modification on the westerly ten acres was submitted, It was for a development of 101,417 square feet compared to 85,105 square feet) which included a supermarket, free-standing bank, free-standing restaurant and retail uses. * September 14, 1987 - The Land Use Map Amendment request from POC to C was officially withdrawn by the agent. * October 19, 1987 - The Planning and Zoning Board considered the site plan submission, which had two major deficiencies and recommended that it be denied. * November 10, 1987 - The City Commission followed the Board's recommendation and denied the requested modification. * December, 1987 - The property owner and others filed an action in the 15th Judicial Court for Judicial review of the City's action, * February 11, 1988 - The petitioners filed for an extension,r with the Court in order to amend their petition. . . * May 24, 1988 - The petitioner's attorney tendered a settlement and queried as to whether the City Commission would revisit the site plan action. At a meeting of the City Commission, it was directed that the site plan would only be revisited upon processing of a revised submission. Thus, requiring Planning and Zoning Board review and recommendation. . * July 1, 1988 - A revised submittal was made involving the western 9,58 acres site. The submission, as amended by a site plan, revised pursuant to initial staff review comments constituted a total 101,917 square feet of retail space. The proposal involves a 63,442 square foot supermarket, 5,000 square foot free-standing restaurant, 5,000 square foot free-standing restaurant, 5,000 square foot free-standing drive thru banking facility and 27,975 square foot of assorted retail, * August, 1988 - The Planning and Zoning Board recommended denial of the site and development plan modification, * August 23, 1988 - The City Commission approved the site plan modification on a 5-0 vote. The City Commission approval was subject to several conditions including the following: - Subject to platting of the entire parcel (including eastern half). - Requiring the developer to be responsible for certain off-site roadway improvements outlined under the roadway improvement section of the staff report. P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 3 - No package liquor sales to be allowed by Albertson's. - Cut-off times for delivery trucks to Albertson's between 10:00 P.M, and 6:00 A,M. - Subject to the installation of an impervious landscape buffer along the north property line. Specifically the installation of a 6' wall, retention of the existing ficus hedge immediately north of the wall and installation of an impervious tree line south of the wall. - Payment for the entire cost of signalization on Military Trail at the Las Verdes entrance, without restrictions on the developer's ability to petition Palm Beach County for credit toward Palm Beach County Fair Share county's ordinance, - The Center's hours of operation are limited to a maximum of 6:00 A.M. to 11:00 P,M., seven days a week, with an option for city Commission to adjust the I operating hours to a 10:00 P.M. closing if 11:00 P,M. . becomes a problem in the future. Albertson's would be' granted an opportunity to correct these problems prior to any operating hours change, - Subject to the site plan approved on August 23, 1988 being incorporated into the settlement agreement, and the agreement be adopted by the Court so that no further modifications to the site plan would be permitted without petitioning the Court and having the Court approve such a modification, * February, 1989 - A final plat which created two lots was approved. One lot for the approved site plan (Albertson's portion) and one lot for the balance of the property including the water management area. * May, 1989 - the proposed Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan showed a designation of "Transitional" for eastern portion of the Delray Town Center project. This designation accommodated the existing zoning of POCo A request to have the land 'lse designation changed to "Commercial" was not accepted by the City Commission, * Subsequent to the approval of the plat; modifications to the water management tract, attendant landscaping, saving of vegetation, northern wall redesign, and related items were worked out and the total property is now under construction. P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 4 * November, 1989 - during the final (adoption) public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan (response to the ORC Report), the City Commission added the zoning designation or Limited Commercial (LC) as being consistent with the Future Land Use Map category of "Transitional". * The current petition for a rezoning from POC to LC is now before the Board. Because of the November, 1989, City Commission action, the petition is processed without an accompanying amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The action before the Board is only that of the rezoning petition, A site and development has also been submitted and is in review. While the site and plan can be viewed and assessed as a potential scenario for site development, it is not binding nor, should detailed aspects of such a site plan unduly influence thél basic land use decision which is associated with the rezonin<¡. petition, I However, because of the site configuration, the approved site plan to the west, the configuration of the water management lake, and the previously determined point of access on Linton Boulevard, site design options are severely limited for the property under a retail use. A floor area of 76,000 sq.ft. is the reasonable maximum which can be accommodated. Extractions to mitigate aesthetic impacts with respect to neighboring residential property and to mitigate noise and traffic considerations may be imposed at the site plan stage; but it is appropriate to identify the degree to which such mitigation measures are expected during the rezoning consideration. With respect to the petition before the Board, the site plan is to follow the zoning action at the Board level, However, the second (final) reading of the zoning ordinance and City Commission on the site plan are scheduled to occur concurrently on May 22nd or June 12th, as appropriate. Thus, the Board should focus on the land use aspects of the issue at this point and, if approved, focus on site plan specifics next month, P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 5 PRO J E eTA N A L Y S I S: STANDARD ZONING ANALYSIS: The criteria for analysis of the rezoning are found in Section 173.888, Standards for Evaluating Rezoning Requests. Each standard is addressed as follows: (A) Relationship to the Land Use Plan: The L.C. zone district is deemed to be consistent with the Land Use Map designation of "Transi tional" . Thus, the requested zoning is consistent with the Future Land Use Map, (B) Relationship to the existing land use pattern: The existing land use pattern is that of retail commercial on the corner of Linton and Military, the site under consideration which is vacant, and the Shadywoods residential development to the east. South of Linton a similar pattern extends easterly from the corner. On the site under consideration and on the corresponding site south of Linton, P~C zoning has been placed thus providing a, "transition" of less intensity as one travels east, ! . The change of zoning from P~C (office) to LC (retail) works' against the traditional transitional pattern described above. However, the eastern portion (27%) of the P~C site is dedicated for lake management purposes. Thus, an approximate 250' use separation occurs between the actual retail use and rear property line of Shadywood residences. This separation provides a use complete separation of use (ie, no vehicular or pedestrian interaction, also a vegetative and open space separation). (C) Spot zoning? The change will not result in "spot zoning" in that: a) it is consistent with the Future Land Use Map; and, b) it will create a contiguous area of twenty acres with the same zoning designation. (D) Will the change alter density/intensity patterns thereby increasing demand on public facilities? From an impact upon facilities and the provision of services, a change from P~C to LC (office to retail) will not increase demands on such items as parks, water, and sewer systems. Traffic is addressed in standard (H). (E) Are district boundaries illogically drawn in relationship to the existing condition on the property? This standard is no applicable in that normally shaped parcels are involved and the site is vacant. (F) Have changed or changing conditions made the proposed rezoning necessary? From the time of first consideration of the property, 1986, there have been changes which adversely affect the buildability of the site as conceived at that time. The actual design of the water feature (lake) combined with the major point of access to the overall center negate the ability to design the office portion as previously depicted. P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 6 In addition to the above, the applicant argues that changes in the economic climate preclude office use as a viable development option, Reversion to a residential designation is a possibility; however, such a project would be poorly situation between the lake and the retail center which is under construction. (G) Will the change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? While this standard may be cited by opponents from nearby residential areas, the site itself is not a part of a specific neighborhood but relates to the intersection of two arterial streets. There is no direct connection, pedestrian or vehicular, between the site and adjacent residential properties. The adversity of the change pertains to the continuing commercialization of the general area. Specific impacts such as evening noise, debris, aesthetics may be mitigated in part by application of the same operating standards which were applied to the westerly portion of the center and by specific mitigation measures (building treatments, fencing or wall, etc.) which may be imposed during site plan review. (H) Impacts pertaining to traffic and congestion: A traffic study, prepared pursuant to the Palm Beach County Traffic· Performance Ordinance, was reviewed and accepted by the County Traffic Division. The assumed impact of the rezoning will be an increase of 2,070 new trips (daily - ADT) above that generated by the shopping center which is under construction, At present Linton Boulevard and Military Trail are operating at level of service B. At completion of the project, the level of service could be at liD" provided that the Knight Center Project (in Boca Raton) is 67% complete. However, with that project there are to be additional ..improvements to Linton Boulevard and the intersection which would enhance the level of service. In short, the proposed project will not reduced traffic to an unacceptable level of service when discounting the Knight Center project, Improvement required by the westerly portion of Delray Town Center will enhance traffic movement beyond that which exists today. In addition, that portion of Linton between IVlilitary Trail and Jog Road is to be widened to four lanes in FY 91/92. (I) Drainage? All project drainage is accommodated in the improvements presently being constructed. (J) Reduction or air and light to adj acent areas: The 250' separation and the lake/drainage area mitigate against any adverse reductions with respect to this criteria. (K) Adverse impact in property values? There can be no direct correlation between this project and property values in the area. In general, property values in this portion of the community should continue to increase particularly in light of enhancements to the school situation. P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 7 (L) will the change be a deterrent to improvement or development of adjacent property....? The property to the south is vacant and zoned POCo This zoning change would contribute to the viability of development of that property under current regulations as opposed to detracting from it because of the reduction of an inventory of POC property. Other undeveloped property in the area should not be affected by the manner of development of this site. (M) Will the change constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare? In that the request is consistent with the Future Land Use Map and is not spot zoning, this criteria does not apply. (N) Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accord with existing zoning? The property can physically be developed as an office complex under POC zoning. (0) Is the change out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the City? The change is not out of scale in that the intersection of Military Trail and Linton Boulevard has:t become on of community scale with a considerable amount of retail~ and other development (hospital) -- much of which is on a, community or regional scale. Thus, while not necessarily' justified in terms of meeting regional or community needs, the proposal is not out of scale with the immediate area. (P) Is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the City for the proposed use in zoning district already allowing such use? There is sufficient vacant land zoned in commercial categories to accommodate the proposed uses. Further, there is a significant amount of vacant space in existing commercial buildings which can accommodate the proposed uses. (Q) Has sufficient evidence been presented to justify the need for the change? The main basis for the change is that of compatibility of the development of the vacant property with the adjacent property which is under construction. This justification is sufficient provided that adverse impacts aren't overbearing and are not mitigated. This latter situation does not seem to be the case. COMMUNITY COMMENT: Attached to this staff report are letters of opposition which have been received as of April 12th. Basis for the opposition includes: * the previous changes and difference between the final product and that advanced in 1986 * preference for middle income housing * frustration with the changes from the 1986 proposal P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 8 * feeling that the change would be detrimental to the neighborhood and lifestyle * existing overdevelopment of the corner and commercial land use in the area Part of the basis for the frustration of Shadywood residents is based upon representations made in 1986 and the existence of easements and agreements between Shadywoods and the then property owner. A close reading of the legal documents does not provide what many of the residents who were involved in 1986 assumed would occur with respect to buffering and easements. Copies of those documents are attached for the benefit of Board members who may be interested in them. OTHER ITEMS: Community Appearance Board: Since a site plan submittal had been made, a preliminary appearance has been made before the Community" Appearance Board. In general, the proposed project is designed! to mitigate adverse impacts with relationship to the Shadywoods. development. Steps include continuing the building treatment' from the main (west elevations) to the rear/side (east) elevation; a wall along the north boundary; extensive vegetation along the west side of the lake; and a barrier along the west side of the lake. Representatives of Shadywood sought a wall; staff suggestions were for a fence with hedging. Resolution of the most appropriate barrier will occur with site plan review. Site Plan Comments: A detail staff review of the site plan submittal has not been formally presented to the Board or the applicant. In general, the site design and details comply with standards and little is anticipated in the way of change or adjustments. Although the site plan is not before the Board, it is appropriate to establish, for the record, any particular thoughts on the site plan concept particularly if imposition at the site plan review level will be based upon a factor such as mitigation of neighborhood impact. Also, the Board has voiced concern with outparcel (outbuilding) development especially when it is not integrally designed into the overall center. Such may be the case with respect to the anticipated drive through bank facility by the entry. STAFF ASSESSMENT: While there is empathy with the plight of the adjacent residential community, events which have occurred with respect to the 1988 court order, the approval of the Albertson's site plan, the location of the primary point of access, the final design of the water management area, and the accommodation of LC zoning as P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 9 consistent with the "transitional" land use designation on the Future Land Use Map all lead to a staff recormnendation of approval of the rezoning request. Other items of significance with respect to the requested zoning is that the LC District presently does not accormnodate cinemas nor a department store which has a floor area in excess of 20,000 sq. ft. . The Comprehensive Plan calls for the elimination of the LC Zone District as it is presently constituted with an intent that it be converted to a more truly "limited" cormnercial character than it presently is, Further, the citizens Evaluation and Appraisal Task Team which has recently completed it's first year review of the Comprehensive Plan has recormnended that the provision which accommodates LC zoning within the "transitional" land use category be deleted. The above events may occur; however, they would not occur until September at the earliest. Thus, if the rezoning is approved and the site plan is approved, the applicant would have to ac~ expeditiously to commence construction in order to vest those approvals. The above information is not presented in order to provide "hope" for. those who oppose the project but to place in the record the! status of current events which may affect the proposedJ development if it is not pursued diligently. I ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION: l. Forward the petition with a recommendation of approval based upon appropriate findings. 2. Forward a recommendation of denial based upon a determination that a "residential transitional" designation is more appropriate than a "commercial transitional" and further recommend that the City initiate a rezoning of the property to RM. Please refer to page III-G-41/42 of the Comprehensive Plan for further information pertaining to the difference between residential and commercial transitional designations. 3, Forward a recommendation of denial based upon a finding that the LC District will accommodate usage which is more intensive than that allowed by POC zoning in terms of usage extending into evening hours, an overall increase in average daily traffic (ADT), and a greater range of uses some of which may be inappropriate in proximity to the existing residential area to the east. 4. Continue consideration of the request to a time certain which must occur within 60 days of the this public hearing [173.886(C)]. P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 10 RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, forward a recommendation of approval based upon a finding that the requested zoning of LC is consistent with the rlTransitional" land use designation on the Future Land Use Map, that the request has been studied with respect to the Standards of Section 173.888, and that the Board finds the request to be generally accepted with respect to those standards. Attachments: * statement of justification from the applicant * reduction of the contemplated site plan * letters of opposition as received through April 12th * copies of agreements executed between the property owner and Shadywoods Association I ! . DJK/#60/PZTOWN.TXT I ".. c' . A ??L~C ~ÙlJ JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT 1:)ç> ~\n'-L '\t)\.1..J.."- C"a....,4 I ? h""-\-O .:::.L - This request for a rezoning from POC - Planned Office Center to LC - Limited Commercial and site plan approval is justified based on its demonstrated need, compatibility with adjacent land uses, established character of the area, and consistency with the general goals of the City's Master Plan and Commercial Needs Analysis. The subject property, located on the north side of Linton Boulevard, approximately 630 feet east of Military Trail, has been designated as Transitional Commercial on the 1989 Land Use Plan, Based on the fact that Delray Beach does not serve as a regional center for office development, and the demonstrated demand for the retail services that are planned for this project, the proposed zoning, Limited Commercial, represents a better zoning sorution than the c~rrent classification, Planned Office Center. Delray Beach is located on the periphery of the regional center for office development; Boca Raton. Therefore, local office space needs can be served by existing and approved/in-process office developments while the regional development continues to occur in the Boca Raton" I area. The accompanying Market Analysis clearly justifies the! development of the subject property as a retail shopping center to· ¡ serve the neighborhood community needs rather than as an office center, the ideal location of which has been previously established elsewhere. Furthermore, the proposed use is the logical expansion of the previously approved shopping center immediately to the west. The expansion will enable the devloper to create a facility that provides a complete range of goods and services to patrons; thereby ensuring more efficient, combined shopping trips resulting in a lessening of the traffic impacts. Providing for a combined facility will also promote a public appearance which is enhanced by continuation of a uniform architectural style, landscaping, signage, and interior traffic circulation. The center is designed to provide a significant and effective landscape and 2.63 acre lake buffer along the eastern property line, adjacent to an existing duplex residential development, The buffer will ensure a minimum 260 foot setback from the east property line to the building, which will orient inward so that the site activity is directed away from the adjacent property, Based on the above, it is clear that the proposal is consistent with the general goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, is consistent with good zoning practice and is justified by market demand. 6· PriVIq wa.--.." \ S89'04'SO"W 1272.92' - .. , ¡~ t 7_~ -v-- I: M' - IS' .... . I j: I o I 'I I -".18' ~ .,. I 'I , ". : I Sub Anchor Retd Sub Anchor Retail Sub Anchor ...:..:.:J ¡¡¡'. · c :. 20,000 f I : 20 000 f Retail' !! , ":,1 IS' ,. : ~ .. I Ilk 'U. 2',70' \1:1 : loin. F.F.E. 2'.'0' ~ 20,000 .f . i - I I; MIll. F.F.E. 21.70' I ; ¡i. # I: I: 'I 103' 35' ~ 1 ,./ 7 J ~. .. AecII __ I w ' ~ ~ I I (Wa..r M..nagemen, EIIS.mit,,~ . -] ) 2_63 ,,' Stop SIgn It ! Hetlclcap .. Remp '"-,,. .,. $I i ( . f ' . .. . --:l r .::J '- ., "---0 " ,:r.,.. H 1 Ñ ! ." " 7 H : H t2'.'8' H I Ïu,.J . . ";' ~. \" I .H 'I ~.. ,. il ~. l I 30' L'8' L 10' ::= t , r . r I I 1 , 'y,10' landacape Bufler Iyp. , I, I I' - i See detal on UncIaC8M "'*' I, ' I .~ I I (SIIMt 4 of 131 for det.. I :--- ----J ....~ c:ï...J Restaurant ; I .. t' In this .... -¡¡ 1 H 7.240 sf 30' ~ i:.- · 1 ~-r- I : 1 MIll. F.F.E. 21.70' , I. '. . c !L ~--:,,' Cj ._:__~ )" , I. ltop ..... ! / ~ Op~11 Space ~ ," ......1".) r;ci, r,õ~ (,:¡'f,? <-wl f.to- L':s- "- '1:' ..~"\ I . 8"II.r Easement '--.·..,S· I . \J .....~w compact . I apac.. I.... t. typ'"'\ f I I '--9·.,I·I,P\; , ) '. i L t' I t J ( ð .., I ~II ',-.-=-=t -; 35' I 5' mecIen I) 15 II P &0"1 " ~ I~I , I .f( C :'OCC'O ,'-- - C- --, 1- -1 · ~ 8'.'6' compact .-eft ---.. - -- -. I Bank i ¡ : Proect LO, SIgn -; =-if" \ ' 4.200 sf I I .'2 _ '_._ ' 12 Ilk F!,E: 2,',70: . I. 30' U:acaplllufl.. . -. $I I I . -- -- -- -- -- -- --... -- --- I I V ~ :>-',::' -: !'.A44t·~1Z17!1 ---- - ,------------ ~J~ ----,...---- ---,..,- .,. _. - "- -- -. -- -- . 4 - , _ . __ \ \ - "--, PraDa.ed Tu:nlnQ/~~c..,.tlon lln. - _, "" E Ilall"~ 1>, -, "',,,, t ': ò' .- - -'-- ~-=----,._,-_._._- ~ r-'- ID --- -~-' ---- \... ~- ~. EASEMENT DEED THIS INDENTURE, made this / 9 dday of November, 1986, by and between LINTON ASSOCIATES, a Florida General Partnership (the "Grantor") , and the CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, a Florida municipal corporation in Palm Beach County, State of Florida (the "Grantee"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantor is the fee simple title owner of a parcel of real property located within the City of Delray Beach, Florida, upon which Grantor intends to develop a professional and business office park: and WHEREAS, the City has required as a condition to Grantor's requested rezoning and site plan approval a seventy-five (75)foot open space butfer easement over and across the east seventy-five (75) feet of the subject propertY1 HOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable considerations to it in hand paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor d~es hereby grant, bargain, sell and release unto the Grantee, ts successors and assigns, a perpetual non-exclusive buffer easement for the purpose of open space preservation, utilities, water management (including water supply and drainage "I facilities) and landscaping purposes, over and across the I following described real property located in Palm Beach county, . Florida, to wit: I See Exhibit "A" annexed hereto and made a part hereof (the · "Easement Property") Concomitant and coextensive with this right is the further right in the Grantee, its successors and assigns, of ingress and egress over and on the Easement Property, to effect the purposes of the easement. Grantor, its successors and assigns, reserves the right to enter upon the Easement Property and to engage in any and all activities associated with the ownership, maintenance and operation of the Easement Property including, but not limited to the construction, maintenance and repair of the landscape, utility and drainage facilities and improvements located or to be located on the Easement Property not inconsistent with this Easement Deed, Grantor, its successors and assigns, reserves unto itself all such rights and privileges in and to the Easement Property as may be used and enjoyed without interfering with or breaching the rights in this non-exclusive easement unto Grantee for the purposes as aforesaid: provided, however, that if the Grantee shall abandon said non-exclusive easement or cease to use the same for the purposes for which it was granted, the easement rights described herein shall revert to Grantor. This easement shall be sUbject only to those easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to the Easement property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever claimed by, through or under it, that it has good right and lawful authority to grant the above-described easement and that the same is unencumbered. Where the context of this Easement Deed allows or permits, the same shall include the successors or assigns of the partie.. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this Easement Deed the day and year first above written. 'WI'rpESSES: / / "¡-(:,' I By: An~ony v.~ 9 iese, III a~Genera¡ r er, as sole suqþ or to the interes of P and P Associates, a Florida General Partnership STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer authorized in the State and county aforesaid to take acknowledqaenta, peraonally appeared ANTHONY V. PUGLIESE, III, a General Partner of LINTON ASSOCIATES, well known to me to be the peraon de!Cribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and he acknow edged to me that he executed the same. . WITNESS my hand ~d official s al i the last 'I aforesaid this ,'1 - day of ~q1 - ^ ( ~ . . My commission expires: IOIAQr PutLZC sun rß H~rn n r~""I:;!IJ' (, SOl U. '1~O 1010(0 IKr.U CU~RAl Ie:, VID. EXHIBIT "A" TO EASEMENT DEED The East 75.00 feet of the following described property: A parcel of land lying in Section 24, Township 46 South, Range 42 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: commencing at the S.W. corner of said section 24; thence N 01 27'42" W along the West line of section 24, a distance of 106.00 feet; thence N 88 41'06" E along a line 106.00 feet North of and parallel with the South line of Section 24, a distance of 689.83 feet to the Point of Beginning of this description; thence continue N 88 41'06" E along said parallel line, a distance of 638.04 feet to a Point of intersection with the west line of "SHAD'lWOODS", as recorded in Plat Book 34, Page 181 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County; thence N 01 27'42" W along the West line of said "SHADYWOODS", a distance of 677.94 feet; thence South 89 04'50" W, a distance of 638.06 feet; thence S 01 27'42" E, a distance of 682.34 feet to the Point of Beginning. (The "Ea.ement Property") " I f ~ I . - -- .-/ . . I2!:CLAn'l'IOH OP US'l'RIC'fIVE COVENANTS "i ., : In accordanò. with· and in con8~8_ration ot the ~rant1nq ot thoe. c.rtain rezoning and 8it. plan..pplica~iona for the project known ae "D.lray Town C.nt.r Ex.c:utiv. Plaza" til.d on behalf ot ANTHONY V. PUG~ZSE, III, HENRY PAPER, DOMINICK ALFIERI, and HARVEY SCHUIJ1'Z, which application va. approv.d by the city council of the city of D.lray B.ach, Florida, a .~icipal corporation und.r the law. of the stat. of Florida, on· the day ot , 19 ____, ~NTON ASSOCIATES, a Florida General partn.r.hip, h.reby agree. to r..trict the ·u.. of the r.al prop.rty d..cribed in Ixhibit "A" attach.d h.r.to and mad. a part her.of (the "Property") in the following manner a 1. The prop.rtI .hall b. utiliz.d exclueiv.ly for op.n epace pr..ervation, utilit .., wat.r .anag..ent (inCludiny wat.r aupply and dr.ina9. faciliti..) and land.capin9 purpo..., t being the int.nt of the undereiqned that the Property. con.titute an op.n .pace b~f.r area. . t' I. Ko ~ui1din9 or other above qroun4 .truoture, oth.r than tho.e ...ooiat.d with the purpo... tor Whiob the ProP.rt~ i. to be 'I u~1111.d, .ball ~e er.ot.d or ..lntain.d upon the Prop. y. Tbe I Property .hall, at all ttae., be open and Gooe..ible to public and . qua.i-public utilitie., oorporation., and óther p.r.on. I inatallinq, .aintsining, ot ..rvioinc¡ land.capiny and wat.r manag.m.nt, or ..rvioing utiliti.. or qua.i-publ c utili tie., all of whom .hall have the ri9ht to inqr... and .gre.. ther.to and th.r.from, .nd the right and privil.ge of what.ver may be nec..aary in, under and upon .aid location. tor the carryinq out of the purpose. tor which the property i. to b. utilized. The R..trictive cov.nant. d..orib.d h.r.in ar. declar.d tor the purpoa. of rrot.cting the member. of the Shadywood. Homeowners A.aooiation .g. nat u.e ot the Property th.t would d.pr.oi.te the v.lu. of th. Sh.4ywood. Development, to pre.erve, .0 t.r a. practic.ble, the natur.l be.uty of the Property .nd to ..oure and maintain adequ.te op.n .pace ~etween the prop.rty own.d by .ember. ot the Shadywood. Homeownera A8.ooi.tion .n4 the .dj.c.nt we.terly develop.ent ot D.lr.y Town C.nt.r Ex.cutiv. Pl.za. The underaigned furth.r .gr.. th.t the.e conditiona, r..trictiona and li.it.tion. .hall ~. 4....él . covenant runn1nq vith the land and .hall r..ain in full tore. .nd .tt.ct, and be ~1nd1nî upon the und.r.iqn.d, th.ir .uoo...o~. .nd ...1qn., until .uch t m. .. the a.m. ah.ll b. r.l....d in writing by the Shadywood. Homeqwn.ra A..ociation, Inc., a 'Florida corporation, or at auch time a. the Shadywood. Hom.own.r. A.aoctation, Inc. ceases to be a viable onqoing legal entity, Which~~~r ahall tirst occur. Th. und.rsiqn.d turth.r agr.. that this inatrument shall b. r.corded 1n Publio R.cord. ot Pal. B..ch county, Florida. IN WITNESS WH!RE~ the und.r.iqned have ex.cuted thi. instrument this /9 day ot /¥(J¿'GI?7AE/(' , 1986. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED IN THE PRESENCE OF: Florida ?~r¡¡ji/{ qliese, III tner, as sole \ )1 r to the interest of p , P A ociates, a Florida General Partnership '- '" --- AJlIRDHENT TO DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THIS AMINDMENT to D.claration of R..trictiv. Covenants; is .ad. by Anthony V 'ulll.... III (hereinafter referred to aa ·'ylli...·) chi. ~ day of January. 1989, V IT. E S S E T H: WHEREAS. Linton A..ociat.a. a Florida general partnership, ex.cuted a Declaration of ae.trictive Covenants dated Novellber 19. 1986 affecting the r.al prop.rty described therein (the ·Property·); and WHEREAS. Anthony V. Pugli.... III is the sole successor i:1 inter.st to L1nton A..ociat.. and 1. now the r.cord title owner of the Property; and -- WHEREAS, 1n connection with the City's approval of a revised site plan sought by Pugli.... the City has requested Pugliese to confirm the continuinl fore. and effect of the Declaration of Re.trictiv. Cov.nant.; NOW, THEREFOR! , for and in con.ideration of the premises, Pu,li... ~.r.by daclar.. a. follow.: 1. Th. above and fO~·loin& pr.ambl. i. h.reby incorporated by r.f.r.nc. h.rein, 2. PUlli... h.r.by ratifi.. and confirm. that the Declaration of a..trictiv. Covenant. continue to remain in full I force and eff.ct a. to the Property notwithstanding the City's approval of Puglie..'sc~ng.s to the previously approved site plan. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the undersigned has executed this Amendment t:o Declaration of Restrictive Coven s of the day and year first above written, ?iI' fÞii:! ANTH LV J STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly authorized in the Stat. and County aforesaid to take acknowledg- ments, per.onally appeared ANTHONY V, PUGLIESE, I II. to me known to be the per.on d..cr1b.d in and who executed the foregoing instrument and h. acknowledged before me that he executed the same. '.11TNESS ~iY hand and offici...l seal 1.-, the County dlld St¡¡Ct: last aforesaid this f.!i day of Janr:r;' 1989.¿J ,~ -/ j\~- , J.ß..' ,¿é¿-?J Notary Public, State of Florida My Commission Expires: L; (:~\ AIlE 8. (QIIIM ~,~.....~\!f ,,&,oJ ~...~, " 'j ; I J ',"-,pt."." CD Community Redevelopment -a Agency Delray Beach April 21, 1990 Hayor Tam Lvnc:h & Cammissioners Delray Beach City Commission Cit.y Hall Delray Beach. FL 33114 Dear Mavor Lvnch and Commissioners: At last niaht's meetina the CRA voted unanimously to recommend and reauest the City Commission to seek from our Leaislative Deleaatian a one-time arant of $2,5 million for the purpose of acquiring and renovatina the former Winn-Dixie store on N.E. 2nd Ave. to convert. it into the Delray Beach Branch of the Palm Beach CO!!\!!1unitv Colleae. Such a project and activity in the Pineapple Grove area ~'!0uld r:1'!::":'2.tly facilitate the economic redevelopment of that area, attractina 3(\0 to 400 people a day. Previous discussions with PBCC President Ed Eissey have shown that ~hile PBCC would very much like to have a presence in Delray Beach. they did not have any money to purchase or renovate a buildinÇ1. They 1;oTould have to look to the CRA or the City to purchase the buildina. then apply for State Capital Facilities monies which are only on a 60-40 co-sharinÇ1 local match basis. Obviousl'!, to" is af the essence. He knoTÑ that the leaislature ~1.me is already in session; hOv7ever, some preliminary contact has already t-e2n made with some members of the delegation and they indicated thë:t they 'tTould at least çrive it a try and attempt to pl?ce the arant reauest in the budqet. There is support for such a joint venture between the City of Delrav Beach and Palm Beach Community Colleae. The CRA uraes the City commission to sunport this effort by sendina a letter to members of our legislative deleaation and directina your lobbyist ta promote this grant reauest. I ~'T i 11 be alad to anS1;oTer any Questions you may have or be of assistance any Hay I can. Sincerely. ~t;f~ Frank R. SDence Executive Director cc: Dr. Ed Eissey, President PBCC arant,pbcc 1 S,E. 4th Avenue, Suite 204. Delray Beach. Florida 33483 (407) 276-8640 CD Community Redevelopment -a Agency Delray Beach April 24- 1990 Hayor Tom Lynçh & Commissioners Delray Beach City Commission City Hall Delray Beach, FL 33444 Dear Mayor Lynch and Commissioners: At last niaht's meeting the CRA voted unanimously to recommend and reauest the Citv Commission to seek from our Leaislative Deleaation a one-time arant of S2.5 million for the purpose of acquiring and renovatinO' the former Winn-Dixie store on N.E, 2nd Ave. to con'lert it into the Delray Beach Branch of the Palm Beach Com!!1unity ColleO'e. Such a project and activity in the PineaDDle Grove area ~'~ould arsa. t 1 y facilitate the economic redeveloDment of that area. attractina 300 to 400 people a day. Previous disçussions with PBCC President Ed Eissey have shown that while PBCC would very much like to have a Dresence in Delray Beach. they did not have any money to purchase or renovate a buildinO'. They would have to look to the CRA or the City to purchase the buildina, then aPDly for State Capital Facilities monies which are only on a 60-40 co-sharinq local match basis. Obviously, time is of the essence. We kno~'" that the leaislature is already in session; h01f7ever. some preliminary contact has already been made with some members of the delegation and they indicated that they ...muld at least give it a try and attemDt to place the arant reauest in the budaet, There is support far such a ioint venture between the City af Delray Beach and Palm Beach Community Colleae. The CRA uraes the City Commission to support this effort by sendina a letter to members of our legislative deleaation and direçtina your lobbyist to promote this grant reauest, I will be alad to answer any questions you may have or be of assistance any way I can. Sincerely. ~t/!~ Frank R. SDence Executive Director cc: Dr. Ed Eissey, President PBCC arant.pbcc 1 S.E. 4th Avenue, Suite 204, Delray Beach, Florida 33483 (407) 276-8640 ... MEMORANDUM '- TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1990 DATE: April 20, 1990 PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No, 7 (Ordinance No. 13-90) : This is a Second Reading of an Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances by enacting a new Section 52.03, "Use of Water from Hydrants" to provide for potable water on an interim or temporary basis from fire hydrants upon approval of the Director of Public Utilities; provides applicåtion requirements; and provides for a minimum deposit fee of $350. Under the current Code provisions, the Fire Chief or an employee of the Utility Billing Division are authorized to approve usage of potable water from fire hydrants. While the current provisions provide an approval authority and schedule of charges, it does not encompass the provisions specified in Section 52,80 of the Code of Ordinances regarding Cross Connections. Those provisions require that a back flow prevention device be installed in every fire hydrant used for a potable water source. These devices are necessary to prevent contamination of drinking water supplies. As the Public Utilities department is familiar with these appurtenances and maintenance of such, staff has recommended that the approval authority be shifted from Utility Billing to the Public Utilities Director, The minimum charges for use of a fire hydrant as a potable water source have been increased from $200 to $350 which reflects the cost to fabricate the backflow/meter devices which are required. Additionally, the minimum daily charges are being adjusted as well. The new charges are: A. For non-residential and vegetation uses $30,86 with a ,53¢/1000 gallon capacity charge for City customers, and; B, $38,57 with a ,66C/l000 gallon capacity charge for customers outside of the City. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 13-90. Item No. 8 (Ordinance No. 14-90): This is a Second Reading of an Ordinance amending Section 71.058 "Cost of Parking or Standing Vehicle in Certain Metered Spaces" by increasing the per hour charge for the parking lot east of the Andrews Avenue Fire Station, at Atlantic Dunes Park, Anchor Park and Sandoway Park to ,75¢ per hour, This ordinance formalizes consensus reached at your April 3rd special/workshop meeting. The cost to change over the meters to the higher rate is approximately $3,500, however this will be offset by the increased revenues realized as a result of this action. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 14-90, Item No. 9 (Ordinance No, 15-90) , This is a Second Reading of an Ordinance amending Chapter 110, "Occupational License is Required" of the City Code by enacting a new subsection to provide that the requirements of Florida Statutes Section 481.201 through and including Section 481.288 are incorporated into our City Code, and implementing Rules of the Florida Administrative Code, regulating the practice of architecture and interior design, Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 15-90. AGENDA REPORT Meeting of 4/24/90 - '- FIRST READINGS Item No. 1 1 (Ordinance No. 16-90). This is a First Reading of Ordinance rezoning Delray Town Center, a 9.6 acre parcel located the north side of Linton Boulevard, approximately 680 feet east Military Trail, between the Albertson's and Shadywood properties f POC (Planned Office Center) District to LC (Limited Commerci District, The development history of this property has been very controversi At present, site work is underway at the intersection of Milit Trail and Linton on this parcel, A 101,000 square foot retail cer. is under construction with Albertson's being the primary tena Associated with that construction is the present excavation c drainage (lake) facility adjacent to Shadywood and a full entry to center from Linton Boulevard. This full entry is situated on specific parcel which is under consideration for rezoning action. We received letters of concern from residents of Shadywood. Generê those concerns were: frustration with deviations from the conCE presented in 1986; the detrimental effect of those changes on character of the neighborhood and lifestyle; and effects of exist over-development on the corner and commercial land use in the area. The Community Appearance Board has made a preliminary review of site plan which has been submitted for this project, In general, proposed project is designed to mitigate adverse impacts v relationship to the Shadywood development. Steps taken inch continuing the building treatment from the main (west elevations) the rear/side (east elevations; a wall along the north boundë extensive vegetation along the west side of the lake; and a barl along the west side of the lake. The Planning and Zoning Board at their April 16th meeting recommended denial (6-1 vote/ Parker dissenting) , Denial was based upon a determination that the LC District will accommodate usage which is more intensive than that allowed by POC zoning in terms of us"~'" extending into evening hours; an overall increase in average dë traffic; and a greater range of uses, some of which may inappropriate in proximity to the existing residential area to east. A detailed staff report is included as background material this item. Recommend consideration of Ordinance No. 16-90. REGULAR AGENDA Item No. 12 Appointment of a Member to the Education Board. r appointment was deferred at your April 11th meeting by Seat 2. Education Board received applications from Trish Brainerd ( expre ¡ verbal interest) Deborah Wright, Katherine Sloan, Rusty Russi: Loren Sheffer, Carolyn Young and John French, copies of which attached as backup for this item, and are recommending the appoint! of either Trish Brainerd or Deborah Wright. Recommend consideration of appointment to Education Board. Item No, 13 Appointment of A Member to the Board of Construc- Appeals. This appointment was deferred from your April 11 th mee- by Seat No, 4 , We received an application from Jay FeIner, Recommend appointment of a member to the vacant General Contract< position on the Board of Construction Appeals to a term ending A] 24, 1992, - 2 - AGENDA REPORT Meeting of 4/24/90 Item No. 14 Short Term Financing- Water and Sewer Projects. At your April 16th meeting, the Commission approved a recommendation from our financial advisor and staff to fund capital improvement projects. That recommendation was to issue a not exceeding $8,000,000 bond issue to fund the Wastewater Treatment Plant Odor Abatement Project and with any remaining funds to be used for engineering costs for other projects, A separate bond issue not exceeding $22,000,000 would be issued in 1991 which would cover the balance of our capital improvement projects. Subsequently, staff has meet with the engineering firm preparing the report for the Official Statement and with the accounting firm preparing our rate study. Based on decreasing water consumption levels, and the uncertainty of bond coverage in the rate structure, staff is requesting authorization to proceed with the line of credit option in conjunction with these bond issues, This line of credit would precede the $8,000,000 Bond Issue, allow funding to be available for the Wastewater Plant project, and allow us the time to perform a more comprehensive rate study. Recommend approval of short-term financing, letter of credit, for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Odor Abatement project. Item No. lS (Resolution No. 16-90) This is a Resolution amending, supplementing and restating Resolution No. 39-88, by authorizing the issuance of not exceeding $8,000,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds for the purpose of financing certain additions, extensions, and improvements to the City's combined public utility. roval of Resolution No, ~- the issuance of Recommend a -90 authorizin not exceeding 8,000,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds. Item No. 16 Type of Sale- $8,000,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Issue. This item is before the Commission for discussion and determination of method of sale. The two options available are negotiation or competitive bid. Through the negotiation process the Commission has the option of selecting an underwriter and negotiating the "best" price. Otherwise, advertisements must be done, bids opened and reviewed, and a final selection made. Competitive bidding can be a very time consuming process and locks us into accepting the lowest bid, whereas by negotiating, our options remain open, Recommend consideration of usin ne otiation as the sales method for the 8,000,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Issue. Item No. 17 Proposed Reorganization- Public Utilities Department, The Public Utilities Director has submitted a plan for the reorganization of the Utilities Department. As proposed, this reorganization would delete five positions, add three new positions and reclassify/ retitle several positions in order to increase the technical and professional capabilities of the Department, as well as consolidate work activities, The Public Utilities Director's immediate priorities are the reorganization of the lower level divisions into three divisions (Maintenance, Water and Sewer Distribution/Collection, and Water Treatment), and to obtain a Deputy Director of Projects. Several alternatives exist for accomplishing these goals, The Commission may wish to approve the reorganization, with the condition that the Safety liaison position be assigned under the Risk Manager with administrative direction to focus of the Public Utilities Department initially. Funding for 1990 would come from the Utilities Department and thereafter would be divided proportionately between the Utilities and Risk Management Departments, Also, you may consider holding off on the deletion of the Utility Permit Administrator position until such time as this position becomes available in the Engineering Department. And lastly, a temporary Deputy Director for - 3 - AGENDA REPORT Meeting of 4/24/90 - --::::.._~ Projects could be hired until such time as a permanent Deputy was available for hire to assist in getting our capital improvements program started, If approved, action to fill new and open positions would happen immediately, while action on those filled positions would be delayed until June 2nd, Salary savings realized from deletion and reclassification of positions are approximately $125,787, Cost of the proposed reorganization is $176,342. An additional $50,555 will be needed to offset the costs of implementation or $25,000 for this fiscal year, Funding is available in existing Public Utilities salary accounts. Recommend approval of proposed reorganization for the Public Utilities Department. Item No. 18 Approval of Short-list and Selection of Consulting Engineer for Water Treatment Plant Softening Conversion project. We received 12 proposals to provide engineering services for this project which consists of the Water Treatment Plant conversion to lime softening, Water Distribution improvement, a water supply system study, and expansion and assistance for the Industrial Pretreatment Program. Staff has reviewed the proposals and are requesting authorization to negotiate a contract with their first ranked choice CH2M Hill, however are requesting that the Commission word the motion to allow them to negotiate with the other firms should an agreement not be made with their first choice, Alternatively, the Commission may wish to interview these firms and make their own selection, Those firms and their ranking are as indicated below: No. 1- CH2M Hill No. 2- Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Inc, No. 3- James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. Recommend approval of short-list and authorize staff to first negotiate with CH2M Hill, then if necessary with Camp, Dresser and McKee, or with James M, Montqomery until an aqreement is obtained, Item No. 19 Approval of Short-list and Selection of Architect. We received letters of interest from 20 architectural firms regard~ng the designing of improvements to Miller Field, Veterans and Currie Commons Parks, These projects are part of our Decade of Excellence Bond Program and consist of construction of a major league ballfield, a multipurpose field, concession areal restrooms, lighting and parking improvements, etc. at Miller Park; development of a passive park, construction of marginal docks, reduction or removal of the lift station, new irrigation, landscaping, playground equipment, pavilion, etc. at Veterans Park; and, construction of little league diamonds, multipurpose field, concession areal restroom, lighting and parking improvements, etc, at Currie Commons Park. Staff have reviewed the proposals and have prepared a short-list of six firms, Those firms are listed below in random order: SWA Group Wallace Roberts and Todd Shoup/McKinley Architects and Planners Digby Bridges, Marsh and Associates Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates Currie Schneider Associates Several options exist regarding these projects, The Commission may wish to to award all of the projects to one firm or divide the work equally between three firms, Likewise, the Commission may interview all six firms and vote or have staff interview the firms and come back with a final recommendation, - 4 - AGENDA REPORT Meeting of 4/24/90 Recommend Commi~ion direct staff to interview the six firms on the short-list and return to Commission with a recommendation of one finalist for award of all three projects. Item No, 20 Conditional Use and Site Plan Approval, We received a request for conditional use and site plan approval to convert an existing single family structure at 206 S.W. 13th Avenue to accommodate a proposed Day Care Center (Little Lee Christian Academy). This is a straightforward request which complies with land development codes. The Planning and Zoning Board at their April 16th meeting recommended approval subject to conditions. A detailed staff report is available for review in the City Manager's office, Recommend approval of conditional use for Little Lee Christian Academy. Item No. 21 Site Plan Approval, We received a request for site and development plan for a proposed 15 unit, multi-story development, Heritage Manor, to be located at the corner of Miramar and Venetian, The development proposal is to construct a five story, 15 unit, condominium development. The subject property contains 45,541 square feet, allowing 15 units (in the RM-15 District, 8,000 square feet of lot area is required for the first two units, with 2,735 square feet of lot area for each additional unit), The proposal includes a subgrade parking area with four floors of residential units above. The garage will have one access point along Miramar Drive with an overhead door. Guest parking spaces and a convenient drop-off area to the central lobby is provided in the front of the building (off Venetian) . Two units will be provided, one will contain approximately 2,020 square feet and the other 2,140 square feet. Both will have two bedrooms and a den/study which can be used as a third bedroom, The third, fourth and fifth floor will contain three units. The second floor will be used as a clubhouse. Recreational amenities include a swimming pool, jacuzzi, two shuffle board courts and clubhouse. At the April 16th, Planning and Zoning Board meeting, several citizens spoke in opposition of this project, The Planning and Zoning Board's vote for approval failed (1-6 vote), Their recommendation for denial was based upon the project being incompatible with adjacent land use and being out of scale with the character of the area in terms of height and intensity. Recommend consideration of site and development plan of Heritage Manor, Item No. 22 Summer Hire Youth Program. The City Commission initiated the Summer Hire a Youth Program four years ago. The Summer Hire program was established to provide City funded job opportunities for youths between the ages of 16 and 21. We are proposing to hire approximately 12 youths at $4.50 per hour for a seven week period. The approximate cost for this program is $15,000 with funding available in the Contingency Reserve for Unallocated Salary Adjustments, Recommend approval of City sponsored Summer Hire a Youth Program with funding from the Contingency Reserve Account, Item No. 23 Agreement between the City and Private Industry Council. This eight week job training program is fully funded by the Private Industry Council and is for youths between the ages of 16-21. The City is responsible for providing a job site and training, The number of youths assigned will depend upon department requirements and - 5 - AGENDA REPORT Meeting of 4/24/90 availability of program participants. In past years approximately 15- 20 youths have participated. In past years the City Attorney has recommended language be added to the contract regarding termination of participants with or without cause and the standard indemnification clause. PIC has continuously denied these requests and the City has accepted the contract without the additional language. Recommend approval of the aqreement between the City and Private Industry Council, Item No, 24 Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Project. In September 1989, the Commission accepted a grant in the amount of $4,000 from the development of a historic design guidelines manual, This was a matching grant fund with the Cit;y contributing $5,500 toward the development of this manual, The Historic Preservation Board received to proposals from Van Horn Gray Associates and Mylan Valk Partnership. They selected Van Horn Gray. The Chair of the Historic Preservation Board, along with the Assistant Planning Direction and Historic Preservation Planner, worked through three draft contracts based upon the initial Request for Proposal ( RFP) . However, during negotiations the scope of work changed significantly. The estimated cost for the initially proposed work product was $14,600. The cost was modified to $12,700 during development of the second draft contract and again revised to $26,500 during the development of the third and current contract proposal, The price fluctuations were the result of modifications to the desired end work product by the Historic Preservation Board. The Board is now requesting Commission authorization to readvertise and solicit new proposals under a revised RFP. Recommend rejection of proposals for Historic Design Guideline Manuals and authorize the Historic Preservation Board to readvertise and solicit new proposals under a revised RFP, Item No. 25 Consideration of Appealing Decision in the Nurmi Litigation, A final judgement was entered in the Nurmi case in the amount of $28,500. The City Attorney's office recommends appeal of the final judgement. Additional background material on this item will be presented to you prior to your Tuesday evening meeting, Recommend approval of City Attorney's request for authorization to appeal the final judgement in the Nurmi litigation. Item No, 26 Settlement of Nuisance Abatement Liens, We received a request from the Estate of Eleanor Wilson to waive interest on unpaid nuisance abatements and water lien and to accept settlement in the amount of $2,504.72. In all, there are 14 nuisance abatement liens and one water lien assessed against the property. The amount of interest which you are requested to waive is $419.28. Additionally, this property has unpaid City taxes which will be paid in full, Recommend consideration of re uest to waive interest in the amount of 419.28 on 14 nuisance abatements and one water lien assessed aqainst the Eleanor Wilson estate and acce t settlement in the amount of 2,504,72, CONSENT AGENDA Item No, 27 Ratification of Old School Square Board of Directors. On March 14, 1990 the Commission approved a Management Agreement with Old School Square which required Commission ratification of the list of individuals selected to serve on the Old School Square Board of Directors. On April 11th, the membership of Old School Square - 6 - AGENDA REPORT Meeting of 4/24/90 nominated and âpproved the following individuals to serve on the Board: To term ending 1993 -Alan Armour, Frances Bourque, Bob Chapin, Joe Gilley, Debbie Little, and Reverend Allen Orr. To term ending 1992- Nancy Earnhart, Larry Parker, Sandy Simon, and Frank Wheat. To term ending 1991- Ron Backer, Skip Hartzel, Dudley Remus and Rabbi Sam Silver, Recommend ratification of appointment of members to the Board of Directors of Old School Square. Item No, 28 Request for Variance. Previously, the Commission approved a variance to construct a dock at 140 Harbor Circle, The City Code requires that a sewage pump be installed as part of the dock construction. The property owner is now requesting waiver of that requirement, The City Engineer has reviewed this request and found that hardship conditions exist and therefore is recommending approval of the variance request. Recommend approval of variance to the requirement to install a sewaqe pump in conjunction with a dock to be constructed at 140 Harbor Circle. Item No, 29 Change Order No. 20- City Hall Expansion. This is a Change Order for the refurbishment of the first floor, lobby, Commission Chambers and south wing of the City Hall main building. This work will consist of but is not limited to, the following: 1. Demolition and trash removal, 2. Installation of dry wall partitions with sound insulation, 3. Reworking fire sprinkler system. 4. Installation of electrical improvements, reusing existing light fixtures. 5. Installati~n of new hvac duct work, dampers and grilles. 6. Installation of a new acoustical ceiling, 7. Installation of new carpeting, wall paper on walls, and painting, 8 . Installing doors and hardware, casework, interior glass and teak benches. 9, Installing Fabra Track acoustical wall treatment, fabric covered on south and southeast walls of the Commission Chamber and installation of an additional 39 seats in the Chamber. This Change Order does not include permit fees, phone, computer, fire alarm of security systems. They will have run conduits as shown. The cost for this refurbishment is $178,000, Additionally, a 120 time extension is requested as part of this action, Recommend approval of Change Order No. 20 in the amount of $178,000 with funding from 1987 Utility Tax City Hall Expansion (Account No. 333-3461-519-60.31) and extension of contract with Sessoms Grice an additional 120 days. Item No. 30 Approval of Final Estimate- N.E. 1st Street Drainage Project. We have received a final estimate from Hardrives, Inc, for completion of the N.E. 1st Street Drainage Project, The estimate is in the amount of $90,062.72, which is approximately $60,000 less than the approved contract amount. The reduction in price can be attributed to cost of actual materials used versus original estimates. - 7 - AGENDA REPORT Meeting of 4/24/90 Recommend apprõval of final estimate in the amount of $90,062.72 with funding from 1987 Utilitv Tax Storm Drainage (Account No, 333-3161-541-61.12) . Item No. 31 Approval of Interlocal E911 Agreement, This is a standard agreement between the City and Palm Beach County for E911 services. This particular agreement establishes the not-to-exceed funding levels¡ equipment acquisition costS¡ maintenance and recurring cost responsibilities¡ completion dates of equipment installations and upgrades ¡ reimbursement procedures¡ minimum performance standards and related procedures pertaining to the E911 Emergency Telephone Number System. This agreement is for a period October 1 , 1990 through September 31, 1991, and shall be automatically renewed and extended for one year terms unless terminated in writing. Recommend approval of E911 Agreement between the City and Palm Beach County. Item No. 32 Request for Waiver of Rental Fees. The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation is requesting use of the City's small stage, eight tables, and 20 folding chairs for their fund raiser on May 19th. Additionally, they are requesting waiver of the rental fees, in the approximate amount of $250, for use of that equipment, In the past, the Commission has favorably consider such requests. Recommend approval of use of City equipment and waiver of rental fees for the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Item No, 33 (Resolution No, 42-90) This item is a Resolution abandoning the right-of-way for Pearl Street and 16 feet of alley located between Lots 1 through 4 of Block 68 as required for the replat of Old School Square property. Recommend approval of Resolution 42-90. Item No. 34 Resolution No. 43-90. This item is a Resolution assessing costs for abatement action required to demolish an unsafe building on property at 702 N.W, 1st Street. The Resolution sets forth the actual costs incurred and provides the mechanism to attach a lien on this property in the event the assessment of $1,980 remains unpaid. Recommend approval of Resolution No, 43-90 assess_ng costs for demolishing an unsafe building within the City, Item No, 35 Resolution No. 44-90, This item is a Resolution assessing costs for abatement action required to demolish an unsafe building on property at 1021 Germantown Road. The Resolution sets forth the actual costs incurred and provides the mechanism to attach a lien on this property in the event the assessment of $1,291.40 remains unpaid. Recommend approval of Resolution No. 44-90 assessing costs for demolishing an unsafe building within the City. Item No. 36 Resolution No. 45-90. This item is a Resolution assessing costs for abatement action required to demolish an unsafe building on property at 902 S.W. 10th Street. The Resolution sets forth the actual costs incurred and provides the mechanism to attach a lien on this property in the event the assessment of $1,511,40 remains unpaid. Recommend approval of Resolution No. 45-90 assessing costs for demolishing an unsafe building within the City. - 8 - AGENDA REPORT Meeting of 4/24/90 Item No. 37 Resolution No. 47-90. A Resolution supporting Palm Beach County School Board's decision to purchase property located on the corner of Atlantic Avenue and Barwick Road for the purpose of constructing a new middle school. Recommend approval of Resolution No, 47-90, Item No. 38 AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS: A. 1990 Street Resurfacing Project- Community Asphalt Corporation in the amount of $216,866,95 to resurface and stripe 29 streets and to construct a 4250 x 5 foot wide bike path along the west side of Homewood Boulevard. Funding is available from General Construction Fund- Resurfacing (Account No, 334-3162-541-60.53). B, Photographic Supplies- Photoline Supplies, Inc. in the amount of $20,000 with funding from various departments operating budgets. C, Office Furniture- City Hall Expansion- Business Environments, Inc. in the amount $56,080.05 with funding from 1987 Utility Tax City Hall Expansion (Account No, 333-3461-519-60.31). Item No. 39- Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items: A, Commission B. City Attorney C. City Manager - 9 - CITY DF DELRA' BEA[H , .. . . . ~,: 1 )(-«( ,¡ ,; t, L_ 1 ¡ WHEREAS, almost twenty years ago, more than twenty million Americans joined together on Earth Day in a demonstration of concern for the environment creating an informed public whose collective action resulted in the passage of sweeping new laws to protect our air, water and land1 and, WHEREAS, in the nineteen years since the first Earth Day, despite environmental improvements, the environmental health of the planet is increasingly endangered, threatened by Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, Tropical Deforestation, Ocean P.ollution, Toxic Wastes, Desertification, and Nuclear Waste requiring action by all sectors of societY1 and, WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 is a national and international call to action for all citizens to join in a global effort to save the planet1 and, WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 activities and events will educate all citizens on the importance of acting in an environmentally sensitive fashion by recycling, conserving energy and water, using efficient transportation, and adopting a more ecologically sound lifestyle1 and, WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 activities and events will educate all citizens on the importance of buying and using only those products least harmful to the environment 1 and, WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 activities and events will educate all citizens on the importance of doing business only with those companies that are environmentally sensitive and responsible; and, WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 activities and events will educate all citizens on the importance of voting for those candidates who demonstrate an abiding concern for the environment; and, WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 activities and events will educate all citizens on the importance of supporting the passage of legislation that will help protect the environment, NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim Sunday, April 22, 1990, as "EARTH DAY" and declare the City's support thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed this 24th day of April, 1990. MAYOR THOMAS E. LYNCH SEAL lo~ CITY OF DELIAY BEA[H , ,- ~ - _.~",,: .:,.,..:. ~=.1..l..l WHEREAS, recognition should be given to the value of trees in our community and the need for a continual city-wide forestry program for the benefit of all persons¡ and, WHEREAS, the holiday to recognize the importance of trees in our lives has been celebrated in the United States since April 22, 1987, and is now celebrated in all fifty states and several countries throughout the world¡ and, . WHEREAS, the National Arbor Day Foundation in coopera- tion with the U.S. Forest Service and the National Association of State Foresters is sponsoring a community improvement project known as "Tree Ci ty USA" in an effort to make every community in America a better place in which to live¡ and, WHEREAS, Delray Beach has been recognized as a Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue its tree-planting ways¡ and, WHEREAS, the protection and proliferation of trees within the City of Delray Beach is governed by regulations for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, welfare, and aes- thetic quality of the community by realizing the importance of trees for oxygen production, carbon dioxide absorption, dust and air pollution filtration, wind and noise reduction, soil erosion prevention, surface drainage improvement, energy conservation, beautification and aesthetic enhancement of all lands in the City¡ and, WHEREAS, the optimum time of year for planting most species of trees in Southeastern Florida is during the month of April due to mild temperatures and the beginning of the wet season, NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim the last Friday in April as "ARBOR DAY" in Delray Beach, to be celebrated this year on Friday, April 27, 1990, and urge all citizens, schools, and organizations in the community to join wi th me in realizing the value and need for trees and to plant a ceremonial tree on this date. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed this 24th day of April, 1990. MAYOR THOMAS E. LYNCH SEAL toR I~ ··1 ~lTI~ i'F DELAAY SEA[H ~4 _._- ~'¡HEREAS , criminal violence preys on millions of Ameri- cans each year¡ and, WHEREAS, victims of crime and their families and friends often suffer grave financial, physical and psychological losses¡ and, WHEREAS, all victims of crime share a common bond of suffering and loss; and, WHEREAS, all citizens of the United States deserve to be treated with dignity, compassion and justice in times of distress¡ and, WHEREAS, equal protection of the law and an effective criminal justice system should be a::forded to all victims, wit- nesses and their loved ones or survivors¡ and, WHEREAS, thousands of our fellow citizens, in their work and their volunteer activities, are devoting themselves to bring- ing a full measure of dignity, compassion and justice to those of our friends, relatives and neighbors who fall victim to crime, NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim the week of April 22 through 28, 1990, as "VICTIMS' RIGHTS WEEK" in the City of Delray Beach and urge all citizens and institu- tions, public and private, to support the enforcement of victim rights and services. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed this 24th day of April, 1990. MAY 0 R THOMAS E.LYNCH SEAL to~ hll :r~TY OF DELRAY BEA[H .,., '. :'_ _,_ :..l..l WHEREAS, the profession of nursing and the Florida Nurses Association are committed to the promotion of health, the prevention of disease and the delivery of quality nursing care¡ and, WHEREAS, the scope and depth of responsibilities assumed by nurses is expanding rapidly in today's complex health care system¡ and, WHEREAS, women and men in nursing are expanding their professional health care roles by continually striving to upgrade standards of care and improve services through research, education and practice; and, WHEREAS, the City of Delray Be ach is fortunate to have dedicated nurses utilizing their knowledge, skills, energy and compassion to improve the quality and accessibility of health care service for our citizens, NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim the week of May 1 through 7, 1990, as "FLORIDA NURSE WEEK" in the City of Delray Beach, in recognition of the contributions of the nursing profession to the health care of our citizens. MAY 0 R THOMAS E. LYNCH SEAL bb ,".' r1,J .'¡, DELAAY BERtH \ ~ ¡ ~ ~ WHEREAS, the profession of nursing and the Florida Nurses Association are committed to the promotion of health, the prevention of disease and the delivery of quality nursing care; and, WHEREAS, the scope and depth of responsibilities assumed by nurses is expanding rapidly in today's complex health care system; and, WHEREAS, women and men in nursing are expanding their professional health care roles by continually striving to upgrade standards of care and improve services through research, education and practice; and, WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach is fortunate to have dedicated nurses utilizing their knowledge, skills, energy and compassion to improve the quality and accessibility of health care service for our citizens, NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim the day of May 7, 1990, as "NURSES DAY" in the City of Delray Beach, in recognition of the dedicated nurses of Delray Community Hospital and the hospital industry as a whole. MAY 0 R THOMAS E. LYNCH SEAL <oe ,~ ',I (1TY DF DELRAY BEA[H .... . -: . --' = , - - " - - '';; -.:. --''':.1'': ,,:; Ii ~_ : I WHEREAS, positive leisure experiences are vital to good physical and mental health enhancing the quality of life for all individuals: and, WHEREAS, the recreation and park profession has made a commitment to provide diverse fun and fitness programs for you th of all abilities, enhancing their overall fitness and health; and, WHEREAS, recreation programming can help combat the problems of juvenile delinquency, drug abuse, and general depres- sion by highlighting new avenues of interest for the youth of the community through the "Exercise the Right Choice" substance abuse awareness and prevention campaign; and, WHEREAS, The National Recreation and Park Association's Fun and Fitness Program has provided a model for further efforts encouraging a lifelong commitment to physical fitness, and, WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach recognizes the contributions and leadership of the Delray Beach Parks and Recreation Fun and Fitness Program in improving the quality of life for all citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS E. LYNCH, Mayor of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, do hereby proclaim May 9, 1990, as "NATIONAL YOUTH FUN AND FITNESS DAY" in the City of Delray Beach. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Official Seal of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to be affixed this 24th day of April, 1990. MAY 0 R THOMAS E. LYNCH SEAL lot=- '''··1 ORDINANCE NO, 13-90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMi'MSS ION OF THE rlTY OF DELPA Y BEACP, FLORIDA, A!\ŒNTHNG TITLE V, "PUBT,IC \A,'ORKS", CPAPTER 52, "WATER" , BY REPEALING SECTION 52.03, "USE OF WATER FROM HYDRANTS" , AND EN ACTING NEW SECTION 52,03, "USE OF WATER FPOM FYDRANTS", TO PROVIDE FOR OBTAINING POTABLE WATER ON A INTERIM OR TEMPORARY BASIS UPON APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, TO PROVIDE THAT IF APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBr,IC UTILITIES ON AN INTERIM AND TEMPORARY BASIS THE APPLICANT SHALT. BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AN APPUCATION INCLUDING A MINIMUM DEPOSIT IN THE AMOT.TNT OF $350, PROVIDING TPAT MINIMUM CHARGE WI r. TJ BE ASSESSED PUPSlTANT TO SECTION 52,34, AND PROVIDING THAT ALL CHARGES BE PAID IN FUTJL BEFORE THE RETURN OF THE DEPOSIT, PROVIDING A SA VING CLAUSE; PR OVID IN G A GENERAL REPFALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF TPE CITY OF DET.RA Y REACH, FLORIDA, ~ AS FOTJLOWS: Section 1, That Title V, "Puhlic Works" Chapter 52, "Water" , "General Provisions" , of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delra~r Reach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby repealed and a. new Section 52,03 "Use of Water From Hydrants", is hereby enacted to read AS follows: / 52,03 Use of Water From Hyòrants, (A) Fire hydrants shnl1 not be used for obtaining" potable water, ey.cept under cprtain ey.tenuatin go circl1mstances wherein a requp.!'it, which must be in writing-. ma~7 be mAde to the Dirpctor of Public Utilities or his /her desi¡rnee for permission to use a fire hyèrant for potable water on An interim or temporarv basis, The Dirf'ctor of Public Vtilities or his/hf'r desi¡rnee must approve all such requests, (B) If permission to use a fire h~7drant is approved b~7 the Dire~tor of PubJic Utilities, or his / her df'sig'nee, on an interim and temporary basis, thf' applicant shaJI he required to submit p.n application including- a minimum deposit of $350, The customer charp:es and capacity charg"f's for a two-inch meter as set forth in Section 52,34, shall he due and payahle p.ach and every month, for AS long- as the meter is installed, refl'ardless of whether the meter is actuaJIy turned on and without rep:ard to usa?'f>, All charges must be paid in full before the df'posit of $350 is returned to the customer, Section 2, That should any section or provision of this ordinance or anv portion thereof, any parag-raph, sentence, or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 3, That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, Section 4, That this ordinance shall become effective ten (0) days after its passage on second and final reading, PASSED AND ADOPTED in reg"Ular session on second and final reading on this the day of , 1990, - Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 7 First Reading- Second Reading' . ",., ·~. - I'RECEIVEL APR o 4 90 MEMORANDUM COMM. sves, GROUP TO: Robert A. Barcinski Asst. City Manager/Community Services FROM: William H. Greenwood b'1)b .¡ /'Illfc Director of Public Utilities SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 24, 1990 - PROPOSED REVISION TO CHAPTER 52, SECTION 52.03 (A&B) DATE: April 4, 1990 Item Before City Commission Request City Commission to approve revisions to Chapter 52, Section 52.03 (A&B) of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances. Background Section 52.03 (A) - Previously authorized the Fire Chief or some employee of the Utility Billing Division to approve usage of potable water from fire hydrants. Public Utilities has a Cross Connection Ordinance in effect (Section 52.80) and currently has back flow prevention devices in stock to be utilized for all fire hydrant water usage. The control of potable water flow from all fire hydrants should logically be transferred to the Public Utilities Director who has staff familiar with these appurtenances and maintenance of them. Section 52.03 (B) - The minimum deposit has been increased to $350 which reflect the cost to fabricate the backflow/meter device currently required for potable water use. Minimum daily charges are being adjusted to correspond with customer charges currently in effect for the meter size (2") contained in the hydrant device. Monthly charges are as follows: Inside City Outside City Non-Residential & Vegetation $30.86 $38.57 Capacity Charge $0.53/1000 gal $0.66/1000 gal Recommendation Staff recommends City Commission approval of revised authorization and connection fees to reflect existing conditions. ~ , I '" ¡ . , ~ '1'1 D R AFT 52.03 USE OF WATER FROM HYDRANTS (A) Fire hydrants shall not be used for obtaining POTABLE water under any circumstance, except -by-~--~...ebe--~~~-h-~~, UNDER EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MUST BE REQUESTED IN WRITING AND APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OR HIS DESIGNEE. -Aftd.~-h-:i:-&~1-a-1:-i-Gß.-a-n<i -oGß-~1:-r~~~~ ~i--'efte.-~i:-1:-~-~i:-J:.J:.~--G-~i-e-i-Gß. - ~-~--4:bFe<M-;k.oD.-~~-Ghe ~~i:-J:.~~i:-1:-J:.~-G\ie-~F-. Scrv-i-G&~~. -~)------i-A--Gð&&-~i-~~~~~~-iP~-¥,~i.&-~ ~HT~-.wat.cr r--iP~HT~~:i:-t,.~~~rG-G--&Aa-1-1-~~~, ~~~~-~~~-+im&-i=Ae--~~-~-\106&--i-&-needed-. -'Pfte.~HTißHim.--<ia-i-~~--~F- water -~~~-&Aa-1-1--G& -$-8-rG-G- -~J!Io -i-fte.:i:d& ~~-\io6&,.. - ~ 4-~rG-G- -io-P-~:i,de. ~~ -\106&,..- --I-a. -~~-~-~~-e.~~-wa-*F--~-èe-~-~~~*Pmo:i:-ned--~ -e-~-~,;&HTißHim.--<ia-i-~-~~r--~-~t,.i-1:-~"¡¡'i-1-1-~~tiGm&· -se.1!'¥':tee--~1!'¥'~J!Io-~--~i-~--~--\io6&F--~-aw~-~F--iP-wa-'&e-1=- ~J!Ior (B) IF PERMISSION TO USE A FIRE HYDRANT IS APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ON AN INTERIM AND TEMPORARY BASIS, THE APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION INCLUD- ING A MINIMUM DEPOSIT OF $350.00. THE CUSTOMER CHARGES AND CAPACITY CHARGES FOR A 2-INCH METER AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 52.34 SHALL BE DUE AND PAYABLE EACH AND EVERY MONTH, FOR AS LONG AS THE METER IS INSTALLED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE METER IS ACTUALLY TURNED ON AND WITHOUT REGARD TO USAGE. ALL CHARGES MUST BE PAID IN FULL BEFORE THE DEPOSIT OF $350.00 IS RETURNED TO THE CUS- TOMER. PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT SHALL INSTALL AND REMOVE THE FIRE HYDRANT METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE. . , . , . I t t ~ . ; ¡ ! ¡~ ,I ORDINANCE NO. 14-90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING TITLE VII, "TRAFFIC CODE" , CHAPTER 71, "PARKING REGULATIONS", "PARKING METERS" , OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SECTION 71.058, "COST OF PARKING OR STANDING VEHICLE IN CERTAIN METERED SPACES", SUBSECTION (A), BY REESTABLISHING THE COST OF PARKING A VEHICLE IN CERTAIN PARKING METER SPACES; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Title VII, "Traffic Code" , Chapter 7l, "Parking Regulations· , "Parking Meters", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, Section 71. 058, "Cost of Parking or Standing Vehicle in Certain Metered Spaces", Subsection (A) be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: SEC. 71.058 COST OF PARKING OR STANDING VEHICLE IN CERTAIN METERED SPACES. (A) The cost of parking or standing a vehicle in a parking meter space located in the parking lot east of the Andrews Avenue Fire Station, and in the parking lots at Atlantic Dunes Park, Anchor Park, and Sandoway Park shall be $~Se $.75 per hour. The cost of parking or standing a vehicre-Tn a parking meter space located along State Road A-1-A shall be $.75 per hour. Section 2. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. I Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in I conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective ten days after passage on second and final reading. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the day of , 1990. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading ~ Second Reading ~E~ORA:-';DC~ TO: Gates D, Castle, P,E, City Engineer/Director of Public ío,-orks FROM: ~ David M, Harvell ~ Assistant Director of Public \o,"orks DATE: March 2, 1990 SUBJECT: PARKI:;-G METER RATES The parking meters on Al.~ have a rate of ,.,- cents per :¿ \} :;..:) minutes, The parking lots (Atlantic Dunes, Sandoway, _~nc ho l and the fire station lot) have 3-15 meters, which have a rate of ?- cents for 3G minutes. The cost to bring the meters 1n -:) the parking lots to the higher rate of ?- cents per 20 -~ minutes would be appro x ima te 1:-- 53,500, excluding in house labor. \·ie would see a substantial 1ncrease in parking meter revenues b~- raising the rates. This increase would not be out of line \o¡-i th \o¡-hat the surrounding cities are charging, If this method of generating revenue has any merit, \"'e should get input from the City :-Ianage r, for this does require a change 1n the ordinance by City Commission, Please advise. DMH:mc attachments . I f . ~ . I . t II 1 r . I r / I~ q ~In- RTTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL ~,jo. 407273 4--S Apr 06,90 7:46 F n- O 0 ".- j I __ --- - .... .'.. -.0. ....- ._........_.. .__..__. ......_._ ............ ~ _ _. J.. ij _., .. n' ._.,.. ,. _., _ ___,_. _. .__, _, ... __-_,_ _._ _.__. ¡ . OaDINANCR. NO~ 15-90 II i 'I I ¡. 1\N OR~!N1\N':E OF 'mE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY Of' 'I DE:..RAY BEACH; FLORIDA, AI'.JmDING TITLE IX, "BUSINESS ! RECUL1\TIONS" , CHAPTER 110, "OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES ¡i GENERÞ.LLY", SECTION 110.08, "WHEN STATE LICENSE IS Ii REQUIRED", BY ENACTING A NEW· SUBSECTION 110.08(C), TO PROVIDE THAT THE RBQUIREÞŒN'1'S OF FLORIDA STATUTES, CH1\P'1'ER 481, "PART I", "ARCHITECTURE" AND IMPLEMENTING RULES OF 'l'HB FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE .1 CODE, GOVERNING ~CHITECTS AND INTERIOR DESIGN PROFESSIONALS SHALL BE INCORPORATED HEREIN, AND ! PROVIDING THAT THE CITY SHALL NOT ISSUE A BUILDING 'PERMIT ( S) IF THE PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES SECTIONS 481.201 THROUGH 481.233 OR IMPLEMENTING Ii RULES OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE HAVE NOT BEEN MET; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A 'I GENERAL REPEALER CL.AUSE 1 PROVIDING 1\N EFFECTIVE " DATE . it · , .. :: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE :¡ CITY OF DELRÞ.Y BUCH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: " !! Section 1. That 'title XI, "Business Regulations", Chapter ¡i 110, "OccupatIonal Lioen.es Generally", Section 110.08, "When State :1 . :' License 1$ Required", be and the same is hereby amended by enacting a :¡ new subsection 110. 0 B ( c), to read as follows: :¡ (0) The requirements ,of ¡Florida stat¿tes section 481.201 :, throuoh and inC1Udino. Section 481.233 (1988) and imple- r menting Rules of the Florida Administrative Code, as may i! be amended from time to time, regulating the practice of 1 architecture and interior design, are hereby incorporated :, as fully as if set forth in length herein. The City :: shall not issue a building permit(s) if it is apparent jI from the face of the application for the building per- : mites) that the provisions of Chapter 481, Part I, of the II Florida Statutes or the implementing Rules of the Florida Administrative Code, .. may be amended from time to time, ! have not been met; provided, however, that a' building ! permit(s) shall not be withheld if an exception or I exemption, as set forth in Flor~da Statutes Section ¡ 481.229 applies. . I I Section 2. That should any section or provision at this ¡II ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be I ¡ declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such II decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a i whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. II Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in 1.1 conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. , I Ii Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective iltlnedi- · ;/ ately upon passage on second and final reading. · ~ I ;1 PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular ae.slon on second and final :! reading on this the day of . 1990. Ji ,I · I, ~ i M A YO It : I A'rl'EST : - . . \. ; I City Clerk ~ First Reading Seconð. Reading '*'·1 ORDINANCE NO. 16-90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REZONING AND PLACING LAND PRESENTLY ZONED POC (PLANNED OFFICE CENTER) DISTRICT IN LC (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT; SAID LAND BEING A PARCEL LYING IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; SAID LAND BEING LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LINTON BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY 680 FEET EAST OF MILITARY TRAIL; AND AMENDING "ZONING MAP OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 1983"; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DEL RAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following described property in the City of Delray Beach, Florida, is hereby rezoned and placed in the LC (Limited Commercial) District as defined . in Chapter 173 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, to-wit: A parcel of land lying in Section 24, Township 46 South, Range 42 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the S.W. Corner of said Section 24; then N 01027'42" W. along the West line of Õaid Section 24, a distance of 106.00 feet; thence N. 88 41' 06" E. along a line 106 feet North of and parallel with the South line of said Section 24, a distance of 689.83 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continue N. 88041'06" E. along said parallel line, a distance of 638.04 feet to a Point of Intersection with the West line of "SHADYWOODS" as recorded in Plat Book 34, Page 181 of the P~lic Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence N. 01 27'42" W. along the West line of said "SHADYWOODS" a distance of 677.94 feet; thence S. 89004'50" W., a distance of 638.06 feet; thence S. 01027'42" E., a distance of 682.34 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Subject to Easements, Restrictions, Reservations, Covenants and Rights-of-Way of Record. The subject property is located on the north side of Linton Boulevard, approximately 680 feet east of Military Trail. The above described parcel contains a 9.962l acre parcel of land, more or less. Section 2. That the Planning Director of said City shall, upon the effective date of this ordinance, change the Zoning Map of Delray Beach, Florida, to conform with the provisions of Section 1 hereof. Section 3, That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed. Section 4. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. , ( I ",'·1 Section 5. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage on second and final reading. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the ____ day of , 1990. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading I Second Reading , i , -2- Ord. No. 16-90 " CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: ÇYL ~LEVERETT' ADM. INISTRATIVE ASSISTANT III U~\j ~ ~ FROM: DAVI J. KOVACS, DrRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1990 CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING FROM P.O.C. TO L.C. FOR A PORTION OF DELRAY TOWN CENTER (LINTON @ MILITARY) ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval on first reading of a rezoning ordinance. This action simply means that the item will proceed to consideration of 2nd reading at a public hearing. The purpose of first reading consideration is to: a) establish the title of the ordinance for publication b) provide an opportunity for the Commission to become familiar with the request and to identify what additional information, if any, may be desired prior to second reading consideration. The site under consideration is approximately 10 acres and is located between the Albertson's portion of the center and the Shadywood's residential area to the east. BACKGROUND: This development has a very long and stormy history. Please refer to the chronology of events which is contained in the Planning and Zoning Board staff report. Your attention is also drawn to the write up of the project description (page 4), the applicant's justification statement (attachment to the report), and a discussion of other items of significance which is found on page 9 of the report. In addition to the above information and the analysis contained in the staff report, there are several letters in opposition to the requested rezoning (these will be provided as a part of the public hearing material) and petition of opposition. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this rezoning on April 16, 1990. The request was forwarded with the following recommendation which passed on a 6-1 vote (Parker dissenting) : "denial based upon a determination that the LC District will accommodate usage which is intensive than that allowed by POC zoning in terms of usage extending into evening hours, an overall increase in average daily ~raffic (ADT) , and ~ greater range of uses - some of which may be in appropriate in proximity to the existing residential area to the east." The following expressions, comments, and positions were put forth by Board Members with respect to the recommendation: Schneider: the choice of zoning is either LC or POC, felt that LC has unacceptable impacts Bridges: does not see the need to accommodate additional retail land use ,jll City Commission Documentation Meeting of April 24, 1990 Consideration of a Rezoning from POC to LC for a Portion of Delray Town Center (Linton & Military) Page 2 Coopersmith: felt it appropriate to side with the community Klarer: felt that the previous history showed POC zoning and use to be preferable to LC zoning and retail usage at this site. The Board heard extensive public testimony from both the project's representative and those in opposition to the requested change of zoning. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approval of the enacting ordinance on first reading and set a public hearing date of May 22, 1990, for second reading consideration. Attachments: * P&Z Staff Report of April 16, 1990 REF/DJK#60/CCGROUP.TXT "I,.j f ~, L. J-iNN 1 f\IG 8 ZO 1 r~G 0ur-1HU STAFF REPORT - -- - - - CITY OF OELRAY BEACH MEET ING rnTE: April 16, 1990 AGEJ'.œ ITEM: IILA. ITEM- Delray Town Center Rezoning, POC to LC, ApproXimately 10 Acres in the Northeast . (~~"QT nf M;l;t~ry Tr~il ~nrl fintnn Rnlllpv;=¡rn. 32 - 61) - - ---t- . . I j. 4· . L Ir: . I .. , __~t . .. .:.,. ;. ~~~ '. t...., ...... 'J .. T · "...... ..... Il ¡,,~:":-.¡:-..:. I . ~ ........- , ~::\. ~s.~yjr.Q~ ' .' ~ \ . ""1Þ'H £ ®. t ~ ' I _ 4.S .... I ..- t') ç: ..r~:~j~~~~:: '::-3 -~- ~. -~-;ø".~- ø.,., ..'" 0,::""1 J ~ .... ... ,......~.. t". J. - t... Þ... C'.~.:-...n ~ :,.. ~ . - --c:: v.?ž - -. -- - - -.c,. -:-;::_ ..- -. . - -- - - ~- - - ._- - 0 GENERAL DATA: Owner. . , . , . , , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Anthony v. Pugliese, III Agent. . . . . ........ . . . . . , . . , . , , . . Robert E. Basehart Location...,..".,........ .... ..North side of Linton Boulevard, approximately 680 ft. east of Military Trail. Property Size..,.,.".,."......9.962 Acres City Land Use Plan.,."..,.., ...Transitional Commercial City Zoni~g.,..".,.".,........POC (Planned Office Center) Proposed Zoning...,.".,........LC (L~mited Commerclal) Adjacent Zoning,.,...,...,....,.~crt~ of the subject property :'5 :c:1eè R- :;.,;.. (Single tarot :../ Dlstrict) and SAD (Spec1al ~C:l~ltlCS Dlstrict), East ~s R!'!- is ( ('!u 1 tip 1 e tam il y D 1 S t =- ~ C t ) . South 1S P~C, and West 1S zoned ¡~C (~lmiteè Ccmmerc1al). Existing Land Use..... ...,.", ,.Vacant Proposed ~and Use.....,..."", .7~.=~J sq. ~t. ~~tall st.C¡;'Pl:-,.g -:~c:-:~ '":': '.',irl t~!.. S·~t··: lce" , , , .. . . " . , , . , , . , . " ,,': ~ ~ ::;:.;.C'::: :^:; riJ tÌ'." ~.. .....IdtC: :.~::~ ·..·lt~:.::~ =>:~:'ò'/ 7s·..:r. Cc::.tc:,: t ::, ': ~..; ,;.. ~ at""\,1 '~nncctln~ to the : G ,. .. ~ ,'1 : . _(J':.) ~r;: m :. 1 n t '':: n Eo U 1 e'¡ arc, ,"'^'C ~ ~~ ~ '.' lce" . . . , . . . .. , . , . . , . , . ,,__'';: " 4 ',', . ..: ~>:. ptG\'ldcè C'/ . , ;-: . . ~.,) 1. (~ ~ ~ c ~ ~H sa:-,.ltar·,' se....'Cl· . . .H :~~¡t3(::........:c\>~s. Agenda Item: III. A ~ I I \' . 1 ~ " I I I ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The action requested of the Board is that of a making a recommendation to the City Commission on a rezoning request from Planned Office Cen~er (POC) to Limited Commercial (LC) , The property in question is approximately 10 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Linton Boulevard and Military Trail and situated between the Albertson's portion of Delray Town Center and the Shadywood residential development. The process and criceria for decision making is found in Sections 173.885 through 173.889, inclusive. BACKGROUND: The development history of this property has been 'lery controversial. At present site work is underway for the ten acre site at the intersection of Military Trail and Linton. A 10l,OOO sq,ft. retail center is under construction with Albertson's being, the primary tenant. Associated with that construction is the, present excavation of a drainage (lake) facility adjacent cot Shadywoods and a full entry to the center from Linton Boulevard. I This full entry is situated on the specific parcel which is under consideration in the rezoning action. Following is a chronology of events which have lead to the current petition: * 1985/86 - A Land Use Ame mime nt request (SF to C) and concurrent rezoning request (R-lAA to GC and POC) were processed. Also, a site and development plan for the Delray Town Center (87,990 square feet) of retail and for the Delray Town Center Executive Plaza í98,950 square feet) \..¡as processed. * July 8, 1986 - The Planning and Zoning Board on a 4-3 vote recommended denial of the plan amendment and rezoning petition. * November 3, 1986 - The Planning and Zoning Board failed to provide a recommendation on the site and development plan (3-3 vote) . The site plans had two components, the retail project and the office park. * November 25, 1986 - A Modified Plan Amendment (C and POI) and modified rezoning petition (LC and POC), along with the site and development, was approved by the City Commission ( 4 -1 vote). * June, 1987 - An amendment to the Land Use Map to affix C designation instead of the POI designation on the eastern portion of the site was submitted. . I . . ~ : ; ~ . . " P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 2 1( August 24, 1987 - A Site Plan Modification on the wester ly ten acres was submitted. It was for a development of lOl,417 square feet compared to 85,105 squar~ feet) which included a supermarket, free-standing bank, free-standing restaurant and retail uses. * September 14, 1987 - The Land Use Map Amendment request from POC to C was officially withdrawn by the agent, * October 19, 1987 - The Planning and Zoning Board considered the site plan submission, which had two maj or deficiencies and recommended that it be denied. * November 10, 1987 - The City Commission followed the Board's recommendation and denied the requested modification. * December, 1987 - The property owner and others filed an action in the 15th Judicial Court for Judicial review of the City's action. * February 11, 1988 - The petitioners filed for an extensio~r with the Court in order to amend their petition. ~ . * May 24, 1988 - The petitioner's attorney tendered a settlement and queried as to whether the City Commission would revisit the site plan action. At a meeting of the City Commission, it was directed that the site plan would only be revisited upon processing of a revised submission. Thus, requiring Planning and Zoning Board review and recommendation. * July 1, 1988 - A revised submittal was made involving the western 9.58 acres site. The submission, as amended by a site plan, revised pursuant to initial staff review comments constituted a total 101,917 square feet of retail space, The proposal involves a 63,442 square foot supermarket, 5,000 square foot free-standing restaurant, 5,000 square foot free-standing restaurant, 5,000 square foot free-standing drive thru banking facility and 27,975 square foot of assorted retail. * August, 1988 - The Planning and Zoning Board recommended denial of the site and development plan modification. * August 23, 1988 - The City Commission approved the site plan modification on a 5 -0 vote. The City Commission approval was subject to several conditions including the following: - Subject to platting of the entire parcel (including eastern half). - Requiring the developer to be responsible for certain off-site roadway improvements outlined under the roadway improvement section of the staff report. ¡ . I . ,. . , '! 1<;1 P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 3 - No package liquor sales to be allowed by Albertson's, - Cut-off times for delivery trucks to Albertson's between 10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A,M, - Subject co che installation of an impervious landscape buffer along the north property line. Specifically the installation of a 6 I ',.¡all, retention of the existing ficus hedge immediately north of the wall and installation of an impervious tree line south of the wall, - Payment for the entire cost of signalization on Military Trail at the Las Verdes entrance, without restrictions on the developer's ability to petition Palm Beach County for credit toward Palm Beach County Fair Share county's ordinance. - The Center's hours of operation are limited to a maximum of 6:00 A.M. to 11:00 P,M., seven days a week-r with an option for city Commission to adjust the, operating hours to a 10:00 P,M. closing if 11:00 P.M. . becomes a problem in the future. Albertson's would be I granted an opportunity to correct these problems prior to any operating hours change. - Subject to the site plan approved on August 23, 1988 being incorporated into the settlement agreement, and the agreement be adopted by· the Court so ~hat no further modifications to the site plan would be permitted without petitioning the Court and having the Court approve such a modification. * February, 1989 - A final plat which created two lots was approved. One lot for the approved site plan (Albertson's portion) and one lot for the balance of the property including the water management area. * May, 1989 - the proposed Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan showed a designation of "Transitional" for eastern portion of the Delray Town Center project. This designation accommodated the existing zoning of POC. A request to have the land ~se designation changed to "Commercial" was not accepted by the City Commission, * Subsequent to the approval of the plat; modifications to the water management tract, attendant landscaping, saving of vegetation, northern wall redesign, and related items were worked out and the total property is now under construction. . , t . ~ . ; ~ "'·1 P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 4 * November, 1989 - during the final (adoption) public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan (response to the ORC Report), the City Commission added the zoning designation or Limited Commercial (LC) as being consistent with the Future Land Use Map category of "Transitional", * The current petition for a rezoning from POC to LC is now before the Board. Because of the November, 1989, City Commission action, the petition is processed without an accompanying amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The action before the Board is only that of the rezoning petition. A site and development has also been submitted and is in review. While the site and plan can be viewed and assessed as a potential scenario for site development, it is not binding nor. should detailed aspects of such a site plan unduly influence the~ basic land use decision which is associated with the rezoning. petition. I However, because of the site configuration, the approved site plan to the west, the configuration of the water management lake, and the previously determined point of access on Linton Boulevard, site design options are severely limited for the property under a retail use. A floor area of 76,000 sq.ft. is the reasonable maximum which can be accommodated. Extractions to mitigate aesthetic impacts with respect to neighboring residential property and to mitigate noise and traffic considerations may be imposed at the site plan stage; but it is appropriate to identify the degree to which such mitigation measures are expected during the rezoning consideration. With respect to the petition before the Board, the site plan is to follow the zoning action at the Board level. However, the second (final) reading of the zoning ordinance and City Commission on the site plan are scheduled to occur concurrently on May 22nd or June 12th, as appropriate. Thus, the Board should focus on the land use aspects of the issue at this point and, if approved, focus on site plan specifics next month. ~ . , ,. . , " ,.'" P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 5 PRO J E eTA N A L Y S I S: STANDARD ZONING ANALYSIS: The criteria for analysis of the rezoning are found in Section 173.888, Standards for Evaluating Rezoning Requests, Each standard is addressed as follows: (A) Relationship to the Land Use Plan: The L.C. zone district is deemed to be consistent with the Land Use Map designation of "Transi tional" . Thus, the requested zoning is consistent with the Future Land Use Map, (B) Relationship to the existing land use pattern: The existing land use pattern is that of retail commercial on the corner of Linton and Military, the site under consideration which is vacant, and the Shadywoods residential development to the east. South of Linton a similar pattern extends easterly from the corner. On the site under consideration and on the corresponding site south of Linton, POC zoning has been placed thus providing ar "transition" of less intensity as one travels east. . ~ The change of zoning from POC (office) to LC (retail) works' against the traditional transitional pattern described above. However, the eastern portion (27%) of the POC site is dedicated for lake management purposes. Thus, an approximate 250 I use separation occurs between the actual retail use and rear property line of Shadywood residences. This separation provides a use complete separation of use (ie. no vehicular or pedestrian interaction, also a vegetative and open space separation). (C) Spot zoning? The change will not result in "spot zoning" in that: a) it is consistent with the Future Land Use Map; and, b) it will create a contiguous area of twenty acres with the same zoning designation. (D) Will the change alter density/intensity patterns thereby increasing demand on public facilities? From an impact upon facilities and the provision of services, a change from POC to LC (office to retail) will not increase demands on such items as parks, water, and sewer systems. Traffic is addressed in standard (H). (E) Are district boundaries illogically drawn in relationship to the existing condition on the property? This standard is no applicable in that normally shaped parcels are involved and the site is vacant. (F) Have changed or changing conditions made the proposed rezoning necessary? From the time of first consideration of the property, 1986, there have been changes which adversely affect the buildability of the site as conceived at that time. The actual design of the water feature (lake) combined with the major point of access to the overall center negate the ability to design the office portion as previously depicted. . . , ~ . : , ~ . . "''I P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 6 In addition to the above, the applicant argues that changes in the economic climate preclude office use as a viable development option. Reversion to a residential designation is a possibility; however, such a project would be poorly situation between the lake and the retail center which is under construction. (G) Will the change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? While this standard may be cited by opponents from nearby residential areas, the site itself is not a part of a specific neighborhood but relates to the intersection of two arterial streets. There is no direct connection, pedestrian or vehicular, between the site and adjacent residential properties. The adversity of the change pertains to the continuing commercialization of the general area. Specific impacts such as evening noise, debris, aesthetics may be mitigated in part by application of the same operating standards which were applied to the westerly portion of the center and by.specific mitigation measures (building treatments, fencing or wall, etc.) which may be imposed during site plan review., (H) Impacts pertaining to traffic and congestion: A traff ic. study, prepared pursuant to the ~alm Beach County Traffic' Performance Ordinance, was reviewed and accepted by the County Traffic Division. The assumed impact of the rezoning will be an increase of 2,070 new trips (daily - ADT) above that generated by the shopping center which is under construction. At present , Linton Boulevard and Military Trail are operating at level of service B. At completion of the project, the level of service could be at "0" provided that the Knight Center Project (in Boca Raton) is 67% complete. However, with that project there are to be additional .unprovements to Linton Boulevard and the intersection which would enhance the level of service, In short, the proposed project will not reduced traffic to an unacceptable level of service when discounting the Knight Center project, Improvement required by the westerly portion of Delray Town Center will enhance traffic movement beyond that which exists today. In addition, that portion of Linton between I1ilitary Trail and Jog Road is to be widened to four lanes in FY 91/92. (I) Drainage? All project drainage is accommodated in the improvements presently being constructed. ( J) Reduction or air and light to adj acent areas: The 250' separation and the lake/drainage area mitigate against any adverse reductions with respect to this criteria. (K) Adverse impact in property values? There can be no direct correlation between this project and property values in the area. In general, property values in this portion of the community should continue to increase particularly in light of enhancements to the school situation. ¡ f . I . f ~ .~ q P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 7 (L) ~ill the change be a deterrent to improvement or development of adJacent property,..,? The property to the south is vacant and zoned POCo This zoning change would contribute to the viability of development of that property under current regulations as opposed to detracting from it because of the reduction of an inventory of POC property. Other undeveloped property in the area should not be affected by the manner of development of this site. (M) Will the change constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare? In that the request is consistent with the Future Land Use Map and is not spot zoning, this criteria does not apply. (N) Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accord with existing zoning? The property can physically be developed as an office complex under POC zoning. (0) Is the change out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the City? The change is not out of scale in that the intersection of Military Trail and Linton Boulevard has'r become on of community scale with a considerable amount of retail. and other development (hospital) -- much of which is on a community or regional scale. Thus, while not necessarily I justified in terms of meeting regional or community needs, the proposal is not out of scale with the immediate area. (P) Is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the City for the proposed use in zoning district already allowing such use? There is sufficient vacant land zoned in commercial categories to accommodate the proposed uses. Further, there is a significant amount of vacant space in existing commercial buildings which can accommodate the proposed uses. (Q) Has sufficient evidence been presented to justify the need for the change? The main basis for the change is that of compatibility of the development of the vacant property with the adjacent property which is under construction. This justification is sufficient provided that adverse impacts aren't overbearing and are not mitigated. This latter situation does not seem to be the case. COMMUNITY COMMENT: Attached to this staff report are letters of opposition which have been received as of April 12th. Basis for the opposition includes: * the previous changes and difference between the final product and that advanced in 1986 * preference for middle income housing * frustration with the changes from the 1986 proposal ~ f ' " . , , " ,., P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 8 * feeling that the change would be detrimental to the neighborhood and lifestyle * existing overdevelopment of the corner and commercial land use in the area Part of the basis for the frustration of Shadywood residents is based upon representations made in 1986 and the existence of easements and agreements between Shadywoods and the then property owner, A close reading of the legal documents does not provide what many of the residents who were involved in 1986 assumed would occur with respect to buffering and easements. Copies of those documents are attached for the benefit of Board members who may be interested in them. OTHER ITEMS: Community Appearance Board: Since a site plan submittal had been made, a preliminary appearance has been made before the community, Appearance Board. In general, the proposed project is designed, to mitigate adverse impacts with relationship to the Shadywoods. development. Steps include continuing the building treatment' from the main (west elevations) to the rear/side (east) elevation; a wall along the north boundary; extensive vegetation along the west side of the lake; and a barrier along the west side of the lake. Representatives of Shadywood sought a wall; staff suggestions were for a fence with hedging. Resolution of the most appropriate barrier will occur with site plan review. Site Plan Comments: A detail staff review of the site plan submittal has not been formally presented to the Board or the applicant. In general, the site design and details comply with standards and little is anticipated in the way of change or adjustments. Although the site plan is not before the Board, it is appropriate to establish, for the record, any particular thoughts on the site plan concept particularly if imposition at the site plan review level will be based upon a factor such as mitigation of neighborhood impact. Also, the Board has voiced concern with outparcel (outbuilding) development especially when it is not integrally designed into the overall center. Such may be the case with respect to the anticipated drive through bank facility by the entry. STAFF ASSESSMENT: While there is empathy with the plight of the adjacent residential community, events which have occurred with respect to the 1988 court order, the approval of the Albertson's site plan, the location of the primary point of access, the final design of the water management area, and the accommodation of LC zoning as ~ / . ~ f '! '<j P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 9 consistent with the "transitional" land use designation on the Future Land Use Map all lead to a staff recommendation of approval of the rezoning request. Other items of significance with respect to the requested zoning is that the LC District presently does not accommodate cinemas nor a department store which has a floor area in excess of 20,000 sq. ft.. The Comprehensive Plan calls for the elimination of the LC Zone District as it is presently constituted with an intent that it be converted to a more truly "limited" commercial character than it presently is, Further, the citizens Evaluation and Appraisal Task Team which has recently completed it's first year review of the Comprehensive Plan has recommended that the provision which accommodates LC zoning within the "transitional" land use category be deleted. The above events may occur; however, they would not occur until September at the earliest. Thus, if the rezoning is approved and the site plan is approved, the applicant would have to act expeditiously to commence construction in order to vest those approvals. The above information is not presented in order to provide "hope" fot:.. r those who oppose the project but to place in the record the, status of current events which may affect the proposed. development if it is not pursued diligently. I ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION: l. Forward the petition with a recommendation of approval based upon appropriate findings. 2. Forward a recommendation of denial based upon a determination that a "residential transitional" designation is more appropriate than a "commercial transitional" and further recommend that the City initiate a rezoning of the property to RM. Please refer to page III-G-4l/42 of the Comprehensive Plan for further information pertaining to the difference between residential and commercial transitional designations. 3 . Forward a recommendation of denial based upon a finding that the LC District will accommodate usage which is more intensive than that allowed by POC zoning in terms of usage extending into evening hours, an overall increase in average daily traffic ( ADT) , and a greater range of uses some of which may be inappropriate in proximity to the existing residential area to the east. 4. Continue consideration of the request to a time certain which must occur within 60 days of the this public hearing [173.886(C)] . ~ . . . I , " ,).) P&Z Staff Report Delray Town Center Rezoning Page 10 RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, forward a recommendation of approval based upon a finding that the requested zoning of LC is consistent with the "Transitional" land use designation on the Future Land Use Map, that the request has been studied with respect to the Standards of Section 173,888, and that the Board finds the request to be generally accepted with respect to those standards. Attachments: '/( statement of justification from the applicant '/( reduction of the contemplated site plan '/( letters of opposition as received through April 12th '/( copies of agreements executed between the property owner and Shadywoods Association r . DJK/#60/PZTOWN.TXT I ~ I I I' . , ~ , '1··1 ". c , A ?~L l C l~iJ-cJ JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT 1)dQc\'\.~~,,- (-<'~ L, ~~~'--" .::..L This request for a rezoning from POC - Planned Office Center to LC - Limited Commercial and site plan approval is justified based on its demonstrated' need, compatibility with adjacent land uses, established character of the area, and consistency with the general goals of the City's Master Plan and Commercial Needs Analysis, The subject property, located on the north side of Linton Boulevard, approximately 630 feet east of Military Trail, has been designated as Transitional Commercial on the 1989 Land Use Plan, Based on the fact that Delray Beach does not serve as a regional center for office development, and the demonstrated demand for the retail services that are planned for this project, the proposed zoning, Limited Commercial, represents a better zoning sorution than the cerrent classification, Planned Office Center. Delray Beach is located on the periphery of the regional center for office development; Boca Raton, Therefore, local offjce space needs can be served by existing and approved/in-process office developments while the regional development continues to occur in the Boca Raton'r area. The accompanying Market Analysis clearly justifies the. development of the subject property as a retail shopping center to ~ the neighborhood community needs rather than office I serve as an center, the ideal location of which has been previously established elsewhere. Furthermore, the proposed use is the logical expansion of the previously approved shopping center immediately to the west. The expansion will enable the devloper to create a facility that provides a complete range of goods and services to patrons; thereby ensuring more efficient, combined shopping trips resulting in a lessening of the traffic impacts. Providing for a combined facility will also promote a pUblic appearance which is enhanced by continuation of a uniform architectural style, landscaping, signage, and interior traffic circulation. The center is designed to provide a significant and effective landscape and 2.63 acre lake buffer along the eastern property line, adjacent to an existing duplex residential development, The buffer will ensure a minimum 260 foot setback from the east property line to the building, which will orient inward so that the site activity is directed away from the adjacent property, Based on the above, it is clear that the proposal is consistent with the general goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, is consistent with good zoning practice and is justified by market demand. ~ . I . . I ~ ;oj.·1 6 P'¡"'ecy W..-_, \ sn·04'$O"W 1272,t2' ,1'0 . u , f\ ~' _I t I - .. _ J ..,. ¡: I ~ fi I : , I ' . I ~ ! I I Sub Anchor A.tal Sub AnchOr Retail: Sub Anchor :' ... ...... , I 20 000 , i Aetail --I ~I . I I ;., Ii ....'IA 21,70' í:j' .... "A 2UO'.i 20.000 If I ,- --; I 'I .... "L 2t.70' . . .. I' ,~ I' 2S' ~ t . .7'" J Like. ... IIIMII __ I , ~ ...... f I (w..., MI"lOement Ease".." -] --.J 263 0<' ... .... . " ~ ...... - .. . ~ :.J C._ ~ " 12'.;;';;1 h 7 --;: r 7 7 H! : H Ir.,1' Ii I _.j . - : 7 7 , ;H I , ! 'I' ~ 30' ell' ~ I , ." · -\,10' 1.eftcIac.... eulf.. Iyl', , I I I ........ 01'1 UftOac.... """ J ; I' (.... . e' 131 'or det" ~- ,--. -¡ ~ ;::.::, r----' L , c.: Aestaurant , I \. WI .... I '11 t .., II --¡-¡ ~ HI ~ 1,240 If t ~-,¡. =- , I: 'I Ii f"i ....'''LIUO', ' \, , 5' --... lYJI"",\l" L 2., l,1' ~ I I ~ I I'~' 10' c:J~ . I'lL c1 .____ ) , I f .... 11Ift t / ' ') OÞct" Sþ.c:. _ - r" :) ,. --:::-:> c::- ' - . 81,tI" e.."",t'''' .-\ 7 ~ tÓ T r;Õ 'tõi r;O to\ ft. L I 1 r I '--...,.. : ' I COftlllMt .pec.. , i .....,..,..'W""\: ¡,I ,I ¡.- , , ",-...~ ~\' ! i IO't,. ~. ~ ' , 'f f· II( c ::::.-' ,. - .' C:'~.:: '.L~. · , 12'. tl'H ... '" compKt .......~ Hlntlcllp ...... Bank I r, ""t U). Sill' '\ ' , ,,- '.200 If , I ' I '2 ~ '2 ' .... fI.E. 2t.70' ,I . -, - -- .. U:::eutler ' ". ~ 2" ,¡'i 1511 , +1 .. , -- -- -- -- -- -- -. .-. -. --- I : : ¡,. :. :: c . ....··_·123,.' ,", ,':.----.--- :7J 1'-' ~ -'---' u_ - ,.- - _.- -- --, - - 4 I __ \ \ _ __ '--·Pfooo.ecS T~f""QI~'C'"ltlO" \-1"' "_, .... ~II.'I"; p...-.~' I . -- - -"-- ==------ - --- ---- ~ C"- ! -- . .- ---- ... ~ .... 'Po ~ , . ~ . r ; ~ ~ , ~ i EASDŒN'I" DEED THIS INDENTURE, .ad. thi8 /9 dday ot Nov.mber, 1986, by and b.tw..n LINTON ASSOCIATES, a Florida Gen.ral partnership (the wGrantor"), and the CITY OF DELRAt BEACH, a Florida .unicipal corporation in Pal. Beach County, Stat. of Florida (the "Grantee"), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantor i. the t.. .i.pl. title owner ot a parcel ot real property locat.d within the city of D.lray Beach, Florida, upon which Grantor int.nd. to d.v.lop a prote..ional and business ottic. park: and WHEREAS, the City has r.quir.d a. a condition to Grantor's r.qu..t.d r.zoninq .nd .it. plan approval a ..v.nty-tiv. (75)toot op.n .p.c. butt.r ......nt ov.r .nd acro.. the .a.t ..v.nty-tive (7!) t..t ot the .ubj.ct prop.rty, HOW, THZREFOR!, tor .nd in con.id.r.tion ot the .u. ot $10,00 and oth.r qoo4 .nd v.lu.bl. con.id.ration. to it in hand paid by the Gr.nt.., the r.c.ipt ot which i. h.r.by acknowl.dq.d, the Grantor d~.. h.r.by qrant, barqain, s.ll and r.l.a.. unto the Grant.., t. .ucc...or. and a..i9O., a p.rp.tual non-.xcluSív. butt.r .a....nt tor the purpo.. ot op.n .pac. pr...rvation, utiliti.., wat.r .anaq...nt (includinq wat.r .upply and drainaqe r faciliti.s) and land.capinq purpo..., ov.r and across the followinq d..crib.d r.al prop.rty located in Pal. B.ach County, . Florida, to wit: I s.. Exhibit "A" ann.xed her.to and .ade a part h.reot (the · "Easement Prop.rty") Concomitant and coext.n.iv. with this riqht is the further riqht in the Grant.., it. .ucc...or. and assiqn., of inqress and eqr.s. ov.r and on the Ea.em.nt Prop.rty, to .trect the purposes ot the .a....nt. Gr.ntor, it. .ucc...or. .nd a..1qn., r...rv.. the riqht to .nt.r upon the E.....nt Prop.rty .nd to .nqaq. in any and all activiti.. ...oci.t.d with the own.r.hip, .aint.nanc. and op.r.tion ot the Z.....nt prop.rty includinq, but not limit.d to the con.truction, ..int.n.nc. .nd r.p.ir ot the land.cap., utility and dr.in.q. t.ciliti.. and improv...nt. locat.d or to b. located on the Eas.m.nt Prop.rty not inconsi.t.nt with this Eas.ment Deed, Grantor, its succ.s.ors .nd a.si9O., r...rv.. unto itsel! all such riqhts and privileq.s in .nd to the E...m.nt Property as may b. used and enjoy.d without int.rt.rinq with or br.achinq the riqht. in this non-.xclusiv. ......nt unto Grant.. tor the purposes as ator.said; provid.d, how.v.r, that it the Grantee shall abandon .aid non-.xclusiv. .a....nt or c.as. to us. the same tor the purpo... tor which it was qrant.d, the .as.ment riqhts describ.d herein shall r.v.rt to Grantor. This eas...nt shall b. subj.ct only to those .asements, restrictions, and r.servations ot r.cord. Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to the Eas.m.nt Property and will defend the sam. aqainst the lawful claims of all persons whomso.ver claim.d by, throuqh or und.r it, that it has qood riqht and lawful authority to qrant the above-d.scrib.d eas.ment and that the same is un.ncumber.d. Wh.r. the cont.xt ot this Easement Deed allows or p.rmit., the sam. shall includ. the succ.ssor. or ass1qns of the parti... ¡ I / .. I . , ~ '"1'·1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this Easement Ceed the day and year tirst above written. 'WITpESSES: LINTON AS General part I By: An~ony V. I q iese, III .<General::r er, as sole suqc or to the intere. ot P and P Associate., . Florida General Partnership STATE OF FLORIDA COUN'I'Y OF PAlM BEACH I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, betore .e, an officer authorized 1n the State and County atoresaid to take acknowledqaen~s, personally appeared ANTHONY V. PUGLIESE, III, a Gsneral Partner of LINTON ASSOCIATES, well known to me to be the person de,cr1bed in and who executed the fore90in9 instrument, and he acknow edqed to .e that he executed the sa.e. WITNESS .y hand ~d otticial s al i the last r atore.aid this \'1 - day ot ' ðVq~ . t I . My commission expire.: ICUH Pull.IC I"'r " 'I~.I'O' n r:"I'~:J' u, 51:" II..,. IOa)(O rMv Iõt.~u. I':. UIC. ~ , t , ~ . : ; ~ . . ~ ,¡q EXHcrBIT "A" TO EASEMENT DEED The East 75.00 teet ot the tollowinq described property: A parcel ot land lyinq in Section 24, Township 46 South, Ranqe 42 East, Palm Beach county, Plorida, beinq .ore particularly described a. tollow.: Commencinq at the S.W. corner at said Section 24; thence N 01 27'42" W along the We.t line ot Section 24, a distance of 106.00 teet; thence N 88 41'06" E along a line 106.00 teet North at and parallel with the South line at Section 24, a distance of 689.83 teet to the Point ot Beqinninq ot this description; thence continue N 88 41'06" E alonq .aid parallel line, a dietance of 638,04 teet to a Point of intereection with the we.t line ot It SHADYWOODS" , a. recorded in Plat Book 34, Page 181 at the Public Recorda ot Pal. Beach County; thence N 01 27'42" W alonq the West line ot said "SHADYWOODS", a distance at 677.94 teet; thence South 89 04'50" W, a distance ot 638.06 teet; thence S 01 27'42" E, a distance ot 682.34 teet to the Point ot Beginning. (The "Ease.ent Property") " , r . I ~ ~ I 1" . 1 '! .,.) - - _/ pZeLAltA'ftON OP 1tDftIC'l'tV!: COVENANTS " J ; '. : In accordanèe with' and in cone~~rat1on ot the 9rant1nq ot tho.. certain reloninq and aite plan..pplica~ion. tor the project known a. "D.lray Town C.nt.r Ex.cutive PlaIa" til.d on b.half ot ANTHONY V. PUGLIESE, III, HlHRY PAPER, DOMINICX ALFIERI, and HAIVIY SCBOtœI, whlch application va. approv.d by the city council of the city of D.lray S..ch, Plorida, a municipal corporation und.r the law. of the stat. ot plorida, on the day ot , 11 ____, LINTON ASSOCIATES, a Plorida G.n.ral Partn.r.hip, h.r.~y aqr... to r..trict the u.. of the r.al prop.rty de.crib.d in Ixbi~it "A· .tt.ch.d h.r.to and .ad. a part hereof (the "Property") in the follovinq .annera 1. The propertI ahAll be utilized exclu.ively for open .pace pre.ervat10n, ut11it .., vat.r wanaq..ent (inCludiny vat.r .upply an4 4ra1naqe taoilit1e.) and land.oap1nq purpo.e., t be1nq the intent ot the under.i91'ed that the Property con.titute an open .pac. b~f.r ar.a. I' a. .0 buildin, or oth.r aboVe qround .t~otur., oth.r th.n tho.e ...ooi.t.d w1~ the purpo... for ¥hioh ~e ~oP.rt~ i. to b. ' r utili.ed, .ball b. .r.ote4 or uinta1n.d upon ~. 'rope y. The 'rop.rty .ball, a~ all ~1a.., be open and Icoe..ibl. to publio and . qua.l-pUblio utllltl.., oorporatlon., and óther p.r.on. I in.talllnq, .alntsininq, of ..rvioing land.capiny and water .anaqe.ent, or ..rvlolnq utllitie. or qua.i-pUbl 0 utiliti.., all of who. .hall have the riqht to inqre.. and .qr... th.r.to and th.r.tro., and the riqht and privil.9' ot what.v.r ..y b. n.c...ary in, und.r and upon .aid location. tor the carryinq out ot the purpo... for which the Prop.rty 1. to b. utiliz.d. Th. Re.trict1v. Covenant. d..cribed h.rein ar. d.clar.d tor the purpo.. ot trot.ctin; the a&ab.r. of the Shadyvood. Ho..own.r. A..ooiation a;a n.t u.. ot the Prop.rty that would depr.ci.te the value ot the Ihadyvood. Developaent, to pre.erv., .0 tar a. practicabl., the natural b.auty ot the Prop.rty and to ..cur. .nd .aintain .d.quat. op.n .pao. b.twaen the property owned by .eaber. of the Shadyvood. Ho.eowner. A8.ooiation and the adjaoent we.t.r1y develop..nt of Delray Town Cent.r lXecutiv. Plal.. Th. und.raiqned furth.r aqr.. that th... condition., r..tr1ct1on. .nd li.itation. .ball be d....c;t a oov.n.nt runn1nq v1th the land and .hall r..ain in full torc. and .ttect, and b. ~1n4Lnï upon the und.r.itn.d, th.ir .uco...o#. .nd a..19n., until .~oh t .. .. the .... .h.ll b. r.l....d inwr1t1nq by the .h.dywood. Ho..qvnlr. A..ooiation, Inc., a Florid. corpor.tion, or at .uch ti.. .. the 8h.dyvood. Ho..own.r. A..oci.tion, Inc. c.as.. to b. a viabl. onqoinq llqal .ntity, Which~V~r .hal~ tirst occur. Th. und.r.i9n.d furth.r aqr.. that th1. in.trum.nt .hall be r.corded in Publi0 R.cord. ot Pala 'eacb County, Florid.. IN WITNESS WK!R!~ tha und.r.iqn.d have .x.cuted th1. inatrwnent thb /9 4ayof Alo¿'¿;~/Jð< , 1916. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED IN THE PRESENCE OF: Florida 7~tfiii~~{ qU..e, I II tn.r, a. .ole r to the interest ot , )1 P , P A ociat.., a Florida General partn.r.hip ~ I I . t . , 'I ",; , "... .. AIII.DMENT TO DECLARATIOM OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THIS AMI"DKllfT co D..la&-ac1on of R..c~1cc1v. Covenant. 1. ..IS. by Anchony V1Io\ .1&111..... I I I (h.~.1n.fc.~ r.ferreeS to .. ·'yllt...·) chi. ~ 4a7 .f Jafty.~y, 1989 , V 1 T . ! S S ! T H: WHERIAS. Linton A..ociat.., . Florid. g.n.r.l partnership, ex.cuted a Docl.r.t1on of R..tr1ct1ve Coven.nt. d.t.d Nove.ber 19, 1986 .ffeceln¡ the real property de.cr1bed there1n (the ·Properey·); and WHEREAS, Anthony V, Pu¡lh.. . III 1. tho .ole succe..or i:'1 intere.e to Linton A..ociac.. and 1. now the record tltle ownor of the Property; and WHEREAS, 1n connoction with the C1ty's approval of a rev1sed s1te plan .0Ulht by .uIUo.o, the C1ty ha. reque.ted Pugliese to conf1rll the cont1nu1nl fore. and effect of the Declarat10n of R..tr1ct1ve Cov.nanc.: NOW, THEREFORE , for and in con.1d.rat1on of the pre.1ses, 'ull1... ~.r.by d.clar.. a. lollow.: 1, The abovo and toroloinl proa..bl0 1. horoby 1ncorporated by rolo~enco hor.1n. r 2. Pu,l1... h.r.b, ratitto. .nd confirll. that the . D.clarat1on of '0.tr1ct1vo Cov.nant. continuo to ro..a1n in full I force and effect a. to tho Property notwith.tandin¡ the C1ty's .pproval of PUlli...·. cyn¡.. to the previously approved s1te plan. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the understgn.d ha. executed th1s Amend:!!.nc t':o D.claracion of Re.tricc1ve Cov.n ncs . of ch. day and y.ar fir.t above writt.n, ?lit ~;f~h ANTH LV J STATE OF FLORI DA COUNTY OF PALH SEACH I HUUY CnTIFY ehac on ehh day bolore "0, an offic.r duly auchor1z.d in tho Stac. and County alore.a1d to take acknowledg- ..ont., por.onally app.ar.d ANTHONY v. PUGLIESE, III, to me known to b. the por.on doacr1b.d in and who oxocutod the foregoing 1n.trullont and he acknowlod¡od bafore ..e that he executed the sarno. 'JITNESS flAY hand and ofUcial 5..1 11"1 thë C (¡ '" 1\ ¡; Y dlld Stile" last aforosa1d thi. f..::i day of January,. 1989'!J ,~ IÍ ./ J' .' . ,; ,t.t· V¿I'I' n) Notary Public, Scate of Florida :-Iy Commiss1on Exp1res: . ~; (i) AIM I.IIOIUI.. _ My ce-. ........~ ........ ... '. ..", ," 0. . I : I J ~ I , . ~ . i t , ,,' MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR LYNCH AND CITY COMMISSION THRU: ROBERT BARCINSKI, INTERIM CITY MANAGER FROM: LULA C. BUTLER, DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ~ RE: RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENT' TO EDUCATION BOARD TO FILL ONE (1) VACANT POSITION - - DATE: AP RI L 19, 1990 BACKGROUND: The City Commission by Resolution No. 23-90 expanded the Education Board to eight appointed positions. The Board has accepted the resignations of two board members (Bill Wallace and Mike Plum) and filled one of the vacancies at the regular Commission meeting on April 10, 1990. The Board has received applications from six (6) persons wishing to volunteer their service. Former Commissioner Trish Brainerd expressed to the Board her willingness to serve in this volunteer capacity. The Board accepted her verbal request at the regular meeting of 3/14/90. Applications were received from the following: 1. Trish Brainerd, (former Commissioner, interest made known and accepted by Board at her last meeting) ... John French '" . 3 . Alfred G. Russillo, Jr. 4. "po Loren Sheffer 5. Ms. Katherine Sloan 6. Deborah Wright 7. Mrs. Carolyn Young RECOMMENDATION: The Board is recommending the appointment of either Ms. Deborah Wright or Trish Brainerd to the vacant position. Copies of applications received are attached for your review and reference. Commission consideration of the recommendation is required. LB:DQ Attachments B:EdB.Mem/LY3 ~ I . . , 1:L ~ .;<-1 q·...Q.ð l...l CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ~.~ BOARD MEMBER APPLICATION ¡¡:Óß¿~L'/ ÇÆ'é).)C-// NAt E ~ . 9ð Ó f)c~èHJD j)Æ '..5~ b ¿)¿L.iVJ Y ß;::;2kI/ :?.3~!?3 HOME STREET ADDRESS, CITY, ZIP (LEGAL RESIDgNCE) PRINCI~SINESS STREET ADDRESS, CITY, ZIP ,::2 V 3-79 ¥ 3 ~ HOME PHONE BUS ESS PHONE WHAT BOARDS ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVIN~ ON: DEL,éA-Ý ßEAC"~/ E.f)0cA 77~-"U í3ðA¿.D - LIST ALL CITY BOARDS WHICH YOU ARE CURRENTLY OR HAVE'PREVIOUSLY , . SERVED ON. (Please include dates) l-/t'/'vIHA.) REZA T/"~~ C/¡¿C-A ~2, f?-3 -:;:. ¡.¡J.ðC) , P..IJ,Rj/C/PAï¿-/J /A,' UlS)ttN5 ::J.ððO 5EI'1IIVA/è ANI) .5uß,it:- é('LJFÁ,-r ~(.·h"IJ7Tt:-ê"- )...,fEr/A.~-Ç þE"AV/l,~ t.)"TrlttC"PE'Jt)5?~C¿- hA.']) i! Ec I!..t-)rrl ~.v #1 GIVE YOUR PRESENT,OR MOST REC~NT EMPLOYER,AND POSITION. Ii) /); RFII/2¡;O / . DESCRIBE EXPERIENCES, SKILLS, OR KNOWLEDGE ~fltICH QUALIFY YOU TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD. ¿'.l €~ 3~ Yr,L/~ ~ ~)5 A TE//c#ER /ht,"/) SCNOðL /1-()hIAA ~77,!A7Zf~ (P~/A,)~ 1/'/1 ¿ , . /Iv C'I1NMr:C:-r1~lI'IM seRvéD ðl1.J , 'ðA ¡¿ JJS ðF E P lJC. TlltJù- £/v r: ~ - LIST ANY RELATED PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES WHICH /3, .5 , / ~ /l. Æ;(}JJ PM FC~Sn.WA L f)/P¿dhA (hrl'/'ý,£. PLEASE ATTACH A BRIEF RESUME. . . . I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE, AND I AGREE AND UNDERSTAND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION MAY CAUSE FORFEITURE UPON MY PART OF ANY APPOINTMENT I MAY RECEIVE. Y~~A~~¥ß - ~/J. /77'd C/ D E / .~, ~ .. ~ I I . r . ¡ , ~ 1 , . ~ I -.,,1 ~ CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BOARD MEMBER APPLICATION NAME ¡fL--Ft2ED G· 'R\,.{ S~ I L-LD ~, ( "RWSTY ,,) , 5""'0 3 NW' ( 57.. ~ "1 /oJ ~^"" ~ c.h.. F-c... .s -J '/ ~ , HOME ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code) (LEGAL 'RESIDENCE) J,. q. u "./ £. ~ A v. . DE f... (Q..'t ;.s J.... J F L 3 J f'~ Y PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS (Street, C~ty, Zip Code) HOME PHONE ~3 1- 'f, 'f -,. BUSINESS PHONE 0( ,,"S - 31 Q 5" ON WHAT BOARDS ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVING £ D UC4r7or..J ß e;A I?- C> . LIST ALL CITY BOARDS ON WHICH YOU ARE CURRENTLY SERVING OR HAVE PREVIOUSLY SERVED (Please include dates) I-fu ""1 """ ¡l £.-t. 4-(7 ()ff 5 (/9 8e) EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS B,S· ,,..J £5 H .i'/N&-~.s ¡oJ. Dr! Ii'll· - 0'-0 l> '--111\Ñ, N W. /., 1<t l'1~iTl2.5 .D&6Il£¿, ,...,) (J ~J/"';.s..; /'~~rf "u..$r~""'; ( ¡4f8J1.) - F,4.l.( IIV 19'?~, LIST ANY RELATED PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES WHICH YOU HOLD /'16r1ß.EIt 01- 1),81."-+; ¡:Jd. }C;I4I~Ñ a LJ.,ð ~;') I'Ÿ"L'J ~~ 1iûS.S'~T/V'£ 12? 7HZ. Z> 6 ¡,~ ".3 cÁ..... C ~,.,,~{(_ ,,~ C!..c",,"",AU C" ,4 , GIVE YOUR PRESENT, OR MOST RECENT EMPLOYER, AND POSITION r l (7 It...nJ ,4.. ¡:b-Þl.. I u ~ rior C!.o ' 1'1 fl 1\/ P¡u'S¡:.¡-JT : &"'JTÞ~IL 5E. '- IIIe¿ .(.f,a '-ê-f CcNS~'-T"1I"'-;- ,,..¡ ])¿£IlÆ! ßcÁ DESCRIBE EXPERIENCES, SKILLS OR KNOWLEDGE WHICH QUALIFY YOU TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD 19- ;1-1 '-;-f- S't: I- (. , ZA,." ~ F'II-ffl£/\... Q¡' .JI'1",,,tJI<'" ¡VØr.,) 1~··f7$.,,~::u"'G r#-;z.A-,Nl""r.. H.J . ~ o.f 7J-tHJ ¿;?Ii. i -../ <' .( ,. '- chl(.c/(.r,'. :¿ f9. L 11'',/ ~ ~ {h; .Nð"n~ ""' "'" ~ f/abu'- s,4.¿. ..,J ~,.. t... 0 ~cJ IY¿Jr ' '.r ~~,J6 I'¡ .s-~..Æ' J:=A-C/1V6 ~.. C~ .. Z wl.SlI '1Þ /?f'~ fI'\ 13~~}"'#:S ~K~A..I""''-£. AwO e.. vf.::...¡tt..T1~Ñ~ /1~t;/L()I4oA./ð TV PL ASE ATTACH A BRIEF RESUME. ..s~~~ r#&~Po"""'S ,.I&.r+--Irv' ~.41L. S c CllJ4.-"S . I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE, AND I AGREE AND UNDERSTAND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICA- TION MAY CAUSE FORFEITURE UPON MY PART OF ANY APPOINTMENT I MAY RECEIVE. ~¿.._~ i/" /,." SIGNATURE . , DATE 4/90 ~ . ~ : , ~ ; ,,' ~ CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BOARD MEMBER APPLICATION NAME /.~~) ~~~c7 - l 7 /1ft cr >":<~~-~i h- HOME ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Cod CE) /I ~ ' I .ð:,A2 CA-ì J/' " 1.- 'L:2C' / ,- /~~;r (/(</v -Y:.-. ' /'[./0, r~-7')B-~ PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code) HOME PHONE 4~-g 7/ 7 BUSINESS PHONE cX'¿/3-¿!&-, c.x:-.J ON WHAT BOARDS ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVING ~{ - .-- ~cl LJ C a.. t \ ù V\ LIST ALL CITY BOARDS ON WHICH YOU ARE CURRENTLY SERVING OR HAVE PREVIOUSLY SERVED (Please include dates) /'t..-)c)/U¿. EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS /k...P~Æ-/¿5 '1 "- ¿,~,~ ~;F /C1'_~~;/t. ftt.J ...4¿1' ?L 2/é~-;i;/;:f-/L/ e¿/~:'?/~/~:JF LIST ANY RELATED PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES WHICH YOU HOLD GIVE YOUR PRESENT, OR MOST RECENT EMPLOYER, AND POSITION rJ /~ //:/bG/,~y''';'t':~ :f),172UG-< _ A/~/C-, ¿¿-, t,/¿) / ~ DESCRIBE EXPERIENCES, SKILLS OR KNOWLEDGE WHICH QUALIFY YOU TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD , - A',T"""" .ÇZ)Úé~7 /":-/G -..,' ./ .é'C,þcG-;~ ~:'é~ /5 /Æ/ ~~ (f/ , / ¿:,F ~"""'¿-C:A-Z-2Ç .c-+-~.)'- ~-<.:J......,..- L~~/¿=- ~J/;?-'7Æ /,-?~j.>';-1 ¿c':-~'<'-?~~~~//~'6- é/W~ ;/*' c::..~...,,/J~ ".~Æt:./»///~Æ.!::¿- ~ é L.. '<:. \ PLEASE ATTACH A BRIEF RESUME, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE, AND I AGREE AND UNDERSTAND THAT Y~¡MENT OF MATERIAL FACTS CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICA- TION MAY :AU /' ~ ~r ~ MY PART OF ANY APPOINTMENT I MAY RECEIVE, -~/~~ . . --.C L ¿ ~/. --7'.4;'/f;;c:> SI~ / DATE 4/90 ~ I . , . r ; ~ -1'·1 , ~ðR4~c:-YU c:Po/P:?,,; /'~~" ..:::;;- ~/ 7?7J;z7 p:7y ¿:=~~/z-....t:J~ ~ ..4 -:/ ~/f~ ¿¿;/// Á~p /ð ~..~;~ /~¿=: ~~ A-~Æ::£?ið<. á~C~~/ULY/~)cF c-7F ø~h'--7 /7 ~~ h ~Þð-E .z:=)\~~~-?Uc.~ , 5'~/~ /r-t./ C)C/ Aê 7,-?A7"~,--évcC:/..4-A6AJG- 4V~~? ~'--6'7U~ /~ "- ~~// Ø;ð /~ Æ:.'~~ /~6~/-'U6 ~Sr~S #C-K?e- £;72--C-//c/G:- //,¿¡ ~£~//ÓIC ... /~ 6'~ ~~- . I !' . , ~ .. ,~ CITY OF DELRAT BEACH - BOARD MEMBER APPLICATION Kathryn S, Sloan NAME , 0; 0.2 Rye Lan e _ D~ay Beacha Floridaa 33444 HOHE STREET ADDRESS, CITY, ZIP (LEGAL RESIDENCE) KaLbi Sumrall RealtYa Inè:.. 822 East Atlantic AveT'IJe. Delrsv Beach.J Florida, 33483 PRINCIPLE BUSINESS STREET ADDRESS, CITY, ZIP ----- -- 278-3175 272-6700 HOHE PHONE BUSINESS PHONE ON WHAT BOARDS ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVING Bo~ of Education . LIST ALL CITY BOARDS ON WHICH YOU ARE CURRENTLY SERVING OR HAVE PREVIOUSLY SERVED (Please include dates) Non~ . - EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ALL~tic Hi2h Schoola 2 r a d u-ª t e d 1985 ___ University of Geor2ia. 2 r a d u at i11..8......JJ1M . 1990 (requirements completed) LIST ANY RELATED PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES WHICH YOU HOLD. F t 0 t..Ld a R e alE s_t_~t~_S_aJ. e sma n L ice n s e -- (at UGA) ___UR..lication for Teacher Cer~Jicatíon beinR filed in Georgia GIVE YOUR PRESENT, OR MOST RECENT EMPLOYER, AND POSITION Kat~~~~~ll Realtv. Inc. Kachi Sumrall. employer Realtor-Associate Salesman. posicion DESCRIBE EXPERIENCES, SICILLS OR KNOWLEDGE WHICH QUALIFY YOU TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD. I have completed my requirements to receive a B/S in Early Childhood Education. I _completed three' months of student teaching in Athens. GeorRia. and four m~nJL~in London, England. -- . PLEASE ATTACH A BRIEF RESUME. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE, AND I AGREE AND UNDERSTAND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS CONTAINED IN THIS AP- PLICATION HAY CAUSE FORFEITURE UPON MY PART OF ANY APPOINTMENT I HAY RECEIVE. ---186' ~~) ¿(~ ßº4-/¡I TURE DATE / I . I I . , ~ . ¡ , ,. t ~ ~ . ì ¡ <~. \ KATHRYN S. SLOAN PERSONAL BACKGROUND Lifetime resident of Delray Beach Parents: John Nicholas and Rose Machek Sloan, III Date of Birth: May 14, 1967 EDUCATION Trinity Lutheran School, grades K-8 Atlantic Community High School, graduated 1985 University of Georgia, graduation June, 1990 EMPLOYMENT . March 1990 l<athi Sumrall Realty, Inc., Delray Beach, Florida position: Salesman Feb. 1988- Coldwell Banker Upchurch Realty, Athens, Georgia June 1989 - position: Office Manager's Assistant Summer 1986 Wee Care Day Care Center, Delray Beach, Florida Summer 1987 position: Assistant Classroom Teacher; infants 2 year aIds, nursery Christmas 1985 Rosella's Bakery, Delray Beach, Florida Christmas \986 position: Che f ' s assistant Christmas \987 . ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND HONORS Autumn \989, Particip;tnt in C.O.S.T. program fo r overseas student teaching, four months teaching in London, England Listed in \988 Edition of Outstanding Young Women of America Dean's List - University of Georgia, 1987-1989 Social Coordinator - College Group - Campus View Church, Athens, Georgia, 1985-1988 Children's Songtime Hour Coordinator and Teacher - 1989, Campus View Church, Athens, Georgia . Sunday School Teacher - 1988 - Campus View Church, Athens, Georgia Member Clarke-Heritage Foundation, Athens, Georgia 1988, 1989 National Pen Women Scholarship, 1985 Miss Atlantic, 1985 REFERENCES Additional re fe rences available upon request . . ~ . : , " , ~ ~ ~ ..,¡q 4 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH - ßOARD HEHBER APPLICATION f)£éð'<~ H l{/ £x..S- tf T tlAHE , . p {).:. /30L (;,Ú 1- Ì)J: '- ,(,1 Ý /Jet., . i=' L, "3"3 'If/V . . -- HOME STREET ADDRESS, CITY, ZIP (LEGAL RESIDENCE) / 5ù L N. ",(J, ¡5 ~ t.:,()·tjR.L-Aur..-., 1t4~~'-. _ "3 3'i f::, F PRINCIPLE BUSINESS STREET ADDRESS, CITY, ZIP ----- -- d 7/sJ - 5" 3 7 :J... c3 3 ? - I <.; 0 Ò HOME PHONE BUSINESS PHONE ON WHAT BOARDS ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERV~~,ÆffQM~I~T~~= , -- LIST ALL CITY BOARDS ON WHICH YOU ARE CURRENTLY SERVING OR HAVE PREVIOUSLY SERVED (Please include dates) ~r ï /1" r~ T-C'M5 MDr II-A/ý - EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ¡fI1, ~t· .&.'<:, ./1 <- S ì"W D.L::c" 5 .A- /VJ¿ßu SIN ew FJ\I.A <:1. p::-l).v - PUf'IK £ ~ ~...IL.""'- A<JI ¿: D ~ë 5v A"/ l!' - - --- LIST ANY RELATED PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES WHICH YOU HOLD. t£13L_ðU!:.fE l- 1; ~.J;f!:i:iE:._J E)lc ff L'AJ.ß:. ~It.Tr ~ (!> ¡If n;- ___ - ------ -- GÀVE YOUR PRESENT, OR MOSTsJECENT EMPLOYER, AND POSITION ífLIM 4~__~(Jc./" ry /tv", '- .ðð.411:: () - &~.4 ~""'f\J~s)_ fl'J UA/;:ïý /j-I"G:.II- Tc- J4. C!. 1+ ~- tt... DESCRIBE EXPERIENCES, SKILLS OR KNOWLEDGE WHICH QUALIFY YOU TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD. ¿:OJCA rrlIv &\~i) - r-~t;.H-r ~ 1'.4~ A;;,'"')Ik-~ 4·L.l~ 13 "*')4."~ . ~ ¡,!fi. 'to- I' ,-I'k\,~~' 6- ... ~ ø iVr", c::_ ~ ¡Ji-I'!. r .. ~ t:;- ~ c.. ,;-os r-t:- - ~ r ' --- -- --- PLEASE ATTACH A BRIEF RESUME. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE, AND I AGREE AND UNDERSTAND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS CONTAINED IN THIS AP- PLICATION HAY CAUSE FORFEITURE upon MY PART OF ANY APPOINTHEHT I HAY RECEIVE. 1.f.d~~__)y~___ 7'~ :l - ~() --------------------------- SIGNAT E DATE - - -,.......:..... - - -.. ._-- --_. -~ ........ . f - ~ . t : , ~ , . . r ¡ ,~ "1 nesuma of Debarðh Jean Wrig~t F·. O. Bo:: 604 Del r 3'y' Bea.=h. Fl::;rl~a 33444 --------------------------------------------------------------- EDUCATIONAL BACI-::GROU~IC ------------ ---------- 1973 - Xaviar U~ivarsitv Ð.S. 1990 - Florida Atlantic University B.A. 1983 - tl.:J·¡ a Ur. i ve¡- ~ i ~ y M.S. E8ºE~~~Iº~eb ~~E~BIÇUÇ~ 1979 - F'r.æsent ~wca Raton High School Büca Raton~ Florida. Sac.:ië.l Studies and Business Education SponSot- cf Florida FutLlre Ecu=.ators o~ America. Club (:=TEA> ~ Ambassador Club~ Cc--Spor.s;:Jt-ed Freshman~ S~phomöre.Ju~ior and Senior ..:Jasses. Coached Girls7 Basketball, 'Jell eyc...ll ~ and Softbé\ll T\?ams. 1987 - 1989 C~rver Middle School De 1.~ 3t' Be 3ch ~ Fl. Part-time Adult Education êSOL and G~D Instructor. 1978 - 79 Carve~ Middle Schaal Pt-oj e.ct RescLle (CETA) :Oalray Beæcr., Florida M~t~ematics Tutorial Teacher 197~ - 7E r=:iln Beach County School Board S~bstltute Teacher QtJ2!b. I [.l~é:IIº~;ê 1 "'otivated~ willing to work to ~chi:!ve goals. Meet and work ""all wi th paopl e at· all levels. .-....w.... '" - - --..- -'~ ~- ~ . , I . ~ . i .. , ~ . ; I ;1'1 . E'sB§º~ebl AoJe 38; Divorced~ e:{cell ent health. Community minded; Enjoy playing bðckgammcn~ EWimming, tenni~ volley bðll~ basketball, softball, raquetball,skating and cheering at my son's basketball games. . Refp.rences .avë\ilë\ble upon requEst. . . - ......, ~ , I ~ . , '! ··1'1 ~ CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BOARD MEMBER APPLICATION NAME (!fJf2;ðL ý/! L .Þu /li¿ ,!<:1~ ~W /~ /~/:/~~ ,iJEL¡(4Y ð¿Afr- HOME DRESS (Street, City, Zip Code) (LEGAL RESIDENCE) .::2 ¿) 5YI/ 0/77.;f;:c=- -~U+1 ~-/fr~1- K 3,3Y~, PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRES (treet, City, Zip Cod HOME PHONE ;:?7¿ - I? 7/ BUSINESS PHONE c?76 - -57 // / . J. ON WHAT BOARDS ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVING /.í)¡¡C/l/7ð4. ýi.,fr;t¡./;t11/ ( V' / { !-{J/V/ /L/~ LIST ALL CITY BOARDS ON WHICH YOU ARE CURRENTLY SERVING OR HAVE PREVIOUSLY SERVED (Please include dates) EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONSI/-p',J~ . -6/(...:;///;/'/'¿Z; r1/J~/~ð/Æ/f-710// LIST ANY RELATED PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES WHICH YOU HOLD GIVE YOUR PRESENT, OR MOST RECENT EMPLOYER. AND POSITION :12-;/,ß/ 6A);:{ /17-;7,,, ./ /Î/;'A/], /:J6a" , -W/-;:t ¿0iC:ft-/l¿'/(,/f¿, ~:'/~/1<. ~ ) - DESCRIBE EXPERIENCES. SKILLS OR KNOWLEDGE WHICH QUALIFY YOU TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD . f ~) ...--..J¿' jl6--/ ¿;; /',/ .;Îr'#,¿) -=..?Cfr¿¿, ~ t: .~¿"~y ~ 'é3:L ¿<ß ~¿.-<.) .X~~'?'0~~¿.n~cJ ~ y {,~/'~ -/ ;/J'?:::?::- "D 1 ..~ þ"./ /j-r!/r é "/~~A., j/:/~/.~/,#çU¿;Æ:J}//!-~;7ßC7 ú~//!-c/¿ . PLEASE ATTACH A BRIEF RESUME. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE. AND I AGREE AND UNDERSTAND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICA- TION MAY CAUSE FORFEITURE UPON MY PART OF ANY APPOINTMENT I MAY RECEIVE, £/k/;kJ , DATE I / 4/90 ~ , . . r ! , , , . I ¡ '" MEMORANDUM TO: Cheryl Leverett, Administrative Assistant THRU : Alison MacGregor Harty. City Clerk~~ FROM: Anita Barba, Board Secretary SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF CONSTRUCTION APPEALS DATE: April 20, 1990 There is one (1) vacancy on the Board of Construction Appeals for the position of General Contractor, Jay Feiner has submitted his resume, attached, for consideration, Based upon the Local Rules adopted by the City Commission on 3/29/90, the appointment would be made by Seat it4 (Mr, Randolph), chebca,txt ~ , I ~ . 13 , " ,I"¡ , . CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BOARD MEMBER APPLICATION ~R1 FC;¡L.rJ E ~ ---- NAME 4110 \~ee FG~~ Dt'l. tLL3~_______ HOME STREET ADDRESS, CITY, ZIP (LEGAL RESIDENCE) 2.100 k'A. ~ S,T t.\ou.øWW C~ D. ß. 634-4-r PRINCIPLE BUSINESS STREET ADDRESS, CITY, ZIP _4qg 280' A~" ZO~ HOME PHONE BUSINESS PHONE ON WHAT BOARDS ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVING ~~ - LIST ALL CITY BOARDS ON WHICH ~E CURRENTLY SERVING OR HAVE PREVIOUSLY SERVED (Please include dates) c.. Sef')W.... CofJU-rÝ c..rJ.-6- 1~'4- Iq~l EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS _~ c.a+ ~I\ -<-t- .- -- - LIST ANY RELATED PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES WHICH YOU HOLD, C <»~ AD 1,.~40-¡'____ - ----- GIVE YOUR PRESENT, OR MOST RECENT EMPLOYER, AND POSITION F 1i..~__ÇQJJSr. ZAJG. ----------- DESCRIBE EXPERIENCES, ..MIL~~N~EDGE WHICH QUALIFY YOU TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD. 3J16ftJ '1" -. ~ ~ - PLEASE ATTACH A BRIEF RESUME, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE, AND I AGREE AND UNDERSTAND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS CONTAINED IN THIS AP- PLICATION MAY CAUSE FORFEITURE UPON MY PART OF ANY APPOINTMENT I MAY RECEIVE. t-/7-n DATE . I I ~ . , '! ~ ,., ~ , Feiner Construction, Inc. 2100 Rabbit Hollowe Circle Delray Beach, Florida 33445 (305) 496·2000 A BRIEF HISTORY Over the last 40 years, FeIner Construction has evolved from a crew of heavy steel workers to a multi million dollar company dcvetoping, io r~cent yea!.'~. S'uch diverse pi"oje~Ls as a large medical office complex, a trade afld business school, residential communities consisting of hundreds of homes and dozens of luxury custom-built homes. During one ten-year period, we even merged into a mini- conglomerate, developing roughly $180 million in co.mercial buildings. Through it all, FeIner Construction has prided itself on superior workmanship and a veIl-earned reputation for excellence as both a builder and manager of co.mercial and residential properties. Our story began during the construction boo. years that followed World War II, when, as sub-contractors, we fabricated and erected structural steel for large co.mercial developers jn the Chicagoland acea. We went on to become general contract- ors on commercial f\ i1d if\dustrial projects--finally officially forming 'FeIner Construction, Inc. . in 1957. About that ti.e, we developed our first residential CO!!lmu nit y of 192 single-fa.ily duplexes, along with several cl·~t().,-bui 1 t. hO:'Jes i.n the n'Orthvé!~t 3uburbs of Cia) cBgO. We al:>o built, owned and managed 464 apartments called La.plighter Gardens in Wheeling, Illinois. It represented our first expansion into property management. In 1966, FeIner Construction helped pioneer the Planned Unit Development (PUD) concept in Illinois when we beca.e one of the State's first general contractors to receive FHA approval to develop one-- named Robinvoods West. The community consisted of 500 homes, along with a huge clubhouse, swi..ing pools and playgrounds. It remains today a model PUD community in Illinois. ~ . I' . 1 ~ "".1 . .In Northwest Chicago, We built five l5-story apartment buildings in the early 1970s--callp.d Lamplighter Towers Apartments. Again, we also owned and managed the property. When FeIner Construçtion joined Di-Com Corporation in 1968, we became part of a mini-conglomerate development operation that built approximately $180 million in commercial buildings over that next decade. Most of those developments we retained for our own portfolio. During the 1970s, my son, Barry Felner was Projects Manager for Rolls Construction in Illinois where his scope of work was n~w construction of and remodeling of interior mall space. Barry excelled in finishing each project on time, on budget, and with a minimum, or no, punch list. Among his projects were upgrade restauraut~, McDonaLts, Radlú Shack stores, Optical shop&, tJh,:":c stores, toy stores, and ready-to-vear shops. Barry has constructed mall space in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin and brings to Florida experience and knowledge of every phase of mall construction. Barry Felner also has extensive experience in re.odeling and is presently on the Board of Directors of the "Re.odelers council" for the Florida Atlantic Builders Association. He has remodeled nursing ho.es, office buildings, residences, int.erior msll spaces and large shopping centers. In 1979 FeIner Construction opened a Florida operation managed by myself, Jay Felner, and my two sons,Jeff and Barry. Licensed as Florida State Certified General Contractors, our early projects included several joint ventures with developers Richard Siemens and Stanley Katz of Rainberry Developers, Inc. , one of the most active residential and commercial developers in South Palm Beach County. Our first community--Rainberry Woods of Delray Beach--consisted of building and selling 92 homes. That was followed by Rainberry Woods South(40 homes) and Rain berry Bay (approximately 400 homes). We also constructed a three story medical office building within the $70 million Delray Community Medical Center campus in Delray Beach. Recently co.pleted projects involved a co.preheD~ive re- modp.ling of 3-15,000 square foot buildings converted into a trade and business schools for the United Business Institute and buildina ho.es in Pheasant Walk, located in Boca Raton, and Vernon Heights, located in Lake Worth. Presently, FeIner Construction is dp.veloping Rabbit Hollowc, a 19-acre co..unity planned for 35 Custom-built ho.es located in South Delray Beach. . . , t · . r ; : t ~ , · · : ,j" £IT' DF DELIA' BEA£H 100 NoW, 1st AVENUE DELAAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 407/243· 7000 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ~OBERT A, BARCINSKI, INTERIM CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: SHORT TERM FINANCING WATER AND SEWER PROJECTS DATE: APRIL 20, 1990 At a special meeting on April 16th, City Commission approved a recommendation from our financial advisor and staff to fund Capital Improvement projects. The approval was to proceed with two bond issues; the first for $8 million to fund the Wastewater Treatment Plant Odor Abatement project and engineering costs for other projects, and a second issue to follow in 1991 for the balance of projects in the proposed $22 million bond issue, Our fall back position was to issue a letter of credit, Since that meeting staff has met with our engineering firm preparing our report for the official statement and with our accounting firm working on our Rate Study, Based on decreasing consumption levels and the uncertainty of bond coverage in the current rate structure, we are now advising that Commission authorize staff to proceed with the line of cred~t option in conjunction with the two bond issues, Authorizing a resolution for the $8 million bond issue follows in your agenda and we would proceed with this item with sale occurring after the rate study is completed and rates are adjusted for this issue. This would serve as security for the letter of credit, RAB:kwg THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS ( I ~ . \~ , ~ ." M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Robert A. Barcinski, Interim City Manager FROM: ® David M. Huddleston, Director of Finance ~ William H, Greenwood, Director of Public Utilities ~~ I/h./tfø SUBJECT: Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Financing DATE: April 19, 1990 A meeting was held this morning with Ed Copeland from Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan, Inc., regarding the engineering report for the Wastewater Treatment Plant financing. With the recent rains, there has been a significant reduction in consumption which effects the revenue and expenditure assumptions that are an integral part of the report. The consumption variations may be temporary or an indication of a trend. The consumption levels impact revenues which impact the debt service coverage capacity, Based upon this morning's meeting, the Bond Validation Issue and the Water and Sewer Rate Study not being completed until June, it seems advisable to proceed with the Line of Credit option in conjunction with the two Bond Issues. The City could still sell the first Issue this summer and should not have to draw on the Line of Credit since the Board's engineers have indicated no payments would be necessary until October or November. If the City proceeds with the Line of Credit, there would not be a need to seek a 60-day extension for the award, C,D.M. would prefer to not request a time extension from the contractor. Costs to do the Line of Credit are expected to be about $10,000 with no draws. The completion of the Rate Study and the enactment of the rates might provide sufficient comfort in the market to offset the $10,000 cost. DMH/ sam ~ I ~ ,1 . , ~ [ITY DF DELRAY BEA[H - ,- ::'- -,;.~,\.¡ MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ~ ROBERT A, BARC!NSKI, INTERIM CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REORGANIZATION - PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 18, 1990 Action Requested Staff is submitting for City Commission consideration and approval the reorganization proposal for the Public Utilities Department, A detailed memorandum from Mr. Greenwood is attached, Background In summary this proposal would delete five ( 5 ) positions; two of which are supervisory in nature, one ( 1 ) technical and two ( 2 ) worker positions. The two worker positions are now vacant, The proposal would add three ( 3 ) supervisory positions, one technical position and one ( 1 ) worker position. It will also retitle and reclassify one supervisory position and one technical position, i. e, the Superintendent of Water and Sewer Network and the Laboratory Supervisor position. Supervisors whose positions are being eliminated could apply for the Superintendent Maintenance position and Assistant Water/Sewer Network position. However we could not guarantee that they would be appointed to these positions. We would, however, strive to place these individuals if possible elsewhere in the City. The net budget effect of the changes is approximately $50,000 per year or $25,000 for this year. Funding would be provided from the existing operating budget. The reorganization would become effective now, for the new and open positions, and for the filled positions June 2 , 1990 in order to consolidate work categories and to manage $30 million of capital improvement projects, This major work activity has never been previously experienced by the City nor the Public Utilities Department. T ..= ¡::.. ~;- A ~ ' , ,.è.. 'j M.:I, C' -;- E R S ( , I . ~ . : : , \1 ~ , i HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS PAGE 2 Recommendation The Interim City Manager recommends approval with the following exceptions: 1. Assign the Safety liaison position under the Risk Manager with administrative direction to place emphasis on the Public Utilities Department for the remainder of FY 90 for safety training development, job training and safety inspections. Funding for the balance of FY 90 would come from the Utilities Fund. Funding for FY 91 would become a Risk Management Fund expense and the Public Utilities Department would pay its proportionate share. 2. Hold on the deletion of the Utility Permit Administrator position until such time as this position becomes available in the Engineering Department and can be functionally moved to an engineering location, Alternative Recommendation Mr, Greenwood's immediate priorities are to reorganize the lower level divisions into the three divisions shown on the chart and to obtain the Deputy Director of Projects. The Assistant Utility Director position could be looked at later. I could also assist Mr, Greenwood by authorizing the hiring of a temporary Deputy Director projects employee now to assist in the development of project implementation schedules needed for his Capital Improvement Programs until a permanent Deputy Director of projects could be hired. RAB:kwg cc: William Greenwood ~ t .. , . , ~ --+". _~5f;CC , MEMORANDUM TO: Robert A. Barcinski Acting City Manager FROM: William H. Greenwood Director of Public utilities . SUBJECT: PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT PROPOSED REORGANIZATION DATE: April 16, 1990 1.0 PROPOSAL Propose to reorganize Public utilities Department to achieve the following improvements: 1.1 Increase technical and professional capabilities 1.2 Consolidate work activities 1.3 Reclassify job descriptions The existing approved budget allocates 72 positions within the Public utilities Department and the proposed reorganization also consists of 72 approved positions. Five (5) positions have been deleted and five (5) proposed positions have been added to increase the technical and management capabilities of the Public Utilities Department. A listing of existing positions being deleted by the proposed reorganization is as follows: 0 Maintenance Worker I - position Open 0 Operator C/Mechanic II - position Open 0 Superintendent Wastewater Collection - position filled - employee may apply for other proposed positions such as Superintendent Maintenance, Assistant Superintendent Water/Sewer Network, Safety Liaison or other open city positions. , . , I . ~ . ¡ . , ~ .. , ; 4'* 0 Assistant Superintendent/Chief Operator Wastewater Collection - position filled - employee may apply for other open city positions listed under superintendent. 0 utility Permit Administrator - position filled - employee may apply for an open position in the City Engineer's Department titled Engineering Inspector/Plan Reviewer or other open city positions. 2.0 HOW IT WORKS 2.1 Technical and Professional Capabilities o Public utilities Department has launched a major $30 million capital improvements program. To successfully implement this program, will require additional technical and management personnel for the next three to five years. Job responsibilities will include preparing RFQ, reviewing construction contract plans and specifications, tracking project schedules and monies, negotiating change orders, etc. In addition, assist the Director with other technical responsibilities. 2.2 Consolidate Work Activities o Public utilities Department has a Water Distribution Division with nineteen (19) budgeted positions and a Wastewater Collection Division with twenty six (26) budgeted positions. I propose to consolidate both divisions under the supervision of one superintendent instead of two superintendents. This consolidated division will then be composed of 32 positions in lieu of 45. o Propose to consolidate twelve (12) maintenance positions from the Water Treatment Plant and Wastewater Collection to a new Maintenance Division. This division will perform all electrical, mechanical and buildings and grounds maintenance on a job order approach. 0 Propose to delete and add the following positions: Net ~ r . , ~ "". Deletions Additions Increase/ Decrease 0 utility Permit Administrator (1) ($18,897) ($18,897) 0 Superintendent of Wastewater Collection ($38,418) ($38,418) 0 Asst. Supt./ Chief Operator Wastewater Collection ($34,299) ($34,299) 0 Operator C/ Mechanic II ($19,011) ($19,011) 0 Reclassify Mechanic III to Mechanic II ($ 977) ($ 977) 0 Maintenance Worker I ($14,185) ($14,185) 0 Asst. Director of Utilities $48,000 $48,000 0 Deputy Director (Projects) $43,000 $43,000 0 Superintendent of Maintenance $37,729 $37,729 0 Secretary II $16,037 $16,037 0 Safety Liaison $23,651 $23,651 0 Technical Support Administrator Grade 20 to 27 $ 7,925 $ 7,925 NOTE: Which does not include fringe benefits TOTALS ($125,787) $176,342 $50,555 . . I I . t . ~ ; ~ .. . i Proposed reorganization will result in a net yearly increase of $50,555. Notes: ( 1) position deleted at an annual cost of $36,026. At present City Engineer's Department has an open position titled Engineering Inspector/Plan Reviewer (Grade 26). It is proposed that Public Utilities Department fund 50 percent of this position because of the consolidation of two positions to implement City Commission's directive for "One stop Plan Review" . 2.3 Reclassify Job Descriptions 0 utility Plant Operator, Grade 17 to Mechanic I, Grade 17. 0 Maintenance Worker I, Grade 14 to utility Service Worker I, Grade 14. 0 Maintenance Worker II, Grade 15 to utility service Worker II, Grade 15. 0 Mechanic III, Grade 21 to Mechanic II, Grade 20. 0 Maintenance Technician I, Grade 16 to utility service Worker III, Grade 16. ~ I ~ . , "! \,,¡ o Technical Support Administrator, Grade 20 to 27. 0 Assistant Superintendent Water Distribution, Grade 23 to Assistant Superintendent of Water/Sewer Network, Grade 23. 0 Superintendent of Water Distribution/Inventory Control Manager, Grade 31 to superintendent of Water/Sewer Network, Grade 31. 0 Plant Manager, Grade 29 to Superintendent of Water Treatment Plant, Grade 29. Implementing the reclassification will decrease the total number of job titles. 3.0 Conclusions and Recommendations Public utilities Department has already implemented the first step by the construction of new offices and related facilities at the utility Complex located at 200 N.W. 1st Avenue. This complex will house the Administration Division and the consolidated Water Distribution and Wastewater Collection Divisions. The proposed new Maintenance Division will be housed at 1700 Lake Ida Road the present location of the Wastewater Collection Division. This site will be needed until the utility complex at 200 N.W. 1st Avenue is enlarged. A proposal for the new facilities is being placed in the proposed FY 90/91 budget. Authorization for the Administration Division to utilize Planning and Zoning Department's office trailers for twelve (12) to eighteen (18) months would permit the proposed Maintenance Division to utilize the space at 200 N.W. 1st Avenue. However, storage of the new T.V. Truck, VacCon and Emergency generators would still be at the Lake Ida Shop area until the new complex was completed. Maintenance Department facilities located at the Water Treatment Plant will be abandoned. Public utilities Department can begin to implement this proposed reorganization within fourteen (14) days of ~ , I . t . J ~ .\'\ approval. Personnel affected by deletion of positions will receive two (2) weeks written notice. 4.0 Next step PBS&J Management Evaluation Report recommended consolidation of utility Billing Division with the Public Utilities Department. This next step plus implementation of porta-processors for meter reading would result in a net decrease in personnel and associated costs during FY 90/91. ti..pJ/ ..Jl.~_J William H. Greenwood WHG: j 0 ATT: cc: John Elliot, Asst. City Manager/Management Services Marty Ritchason, Director Personnel/Labor Relations Cheryl Leverett, Administrative Asst. . , , ~ . , "! ,.. -- --------- - ---------- I I ~ .. _ á i~ ^ _0 -~o. n" >Q.~ °.0 }9 ~~ ...0... .!~ ~.to J 1:1 = = - ~ - - - ,... I/) u u ¡ ii!£ !f =1:: ... ........ w ~ ~ õ - ~~~Æ ~~ §! · I)!I)!"'ö ,-' .3.3 I~' - 5 - I en' u _,..; ,:ë' - ì~N I ~I _ - _. 1>-1 ~a ';'8 ,; I ~ ~ :I šc) 1",1 L!: 2....a: , ' 3 '" ~ .1< -~ 00 _...¡ w w ! :... ¡s ...! is :, j iJ ~ !.... . ., &h - ¡. ð Q'" ... '" 0 o ... 011[ .... .... , Š c ~æ!i 8...~ 025 ....!i -J ~ ¡ =~ ... a: Z t .~ %:~ I'~\ ...8& ~n:: ~ ~ 'ç'$", , ; .::.iI ~ <II ~ - 1 ;;¡!;: , . 5 !... .... :z: ,..~- W Ii - ... S >- ¡:; 5 u '~"':I, i~J5 =:sli! !: .. ~ :¡ ~ !i 1 ~~s, ,IS ~~~ : £1 -' ¡:; 0:1 ,"'0 , :;; ~ . ~.; i .J'" ~ :::) 0 \ I ~!ëw ¥ : 0 ut)( ,-.... . c,..~ ~-o __ ~~~ .~ ~ 0 _ _ S If ; ~ <t~o '" !::!!i ¡;; .! 5o.~ IS !3. !i~ ~ ~ .5 ~ vtz Q 0 ~ - ~ .3 .. i ~ I 2 . . '" "t ¡ !!! i J ti :!f.5 l..~~ t.3: .§ i ~=¡ ... ~ '" ~~~ ~~~ z..'t ð~~ ¥:"t :~> ~- !i- : ~ ~ > ~ ~ O -. II. .x ... ---, "'-e.!Jí" :WI _== N¡;-ð>-:~ I ~ I § ;:; ...!::! f ~i ~.5 ¡ ! ~ ";~I > iì~ .35.3"'=5~" , ~ ¡ ~ ð ... a ð~":" 0 .. ~ , :ë: ~ W ~ 'j b ~~ ~ 2 i ~ -8 , 2 I ~.... :.!. ~ 0 L - - - .. ...l ~ :f ~ 0 .3 'I! 0. ~ 0 .3 .3 - ~ ~~~-~!UI~-=~ ! ~~~¡!::!"IR f~~¡ i ~~Eð! fõ .3~~:! · .......'j... ~·t-i·· 2 ......... Z", .2= i~ 'tS 0 6. U " .. t '1! 5í8l.....: ~ ... ... c c " \ ~ ".. ... J i i j , I ... IS!... ... ... '" ',..5~1 !:~ 9 i:::t:¡ It::t u : . I ; s ,iCW~' .2f ~ 51 ~ ~ '~-"'I ¥~:o:¥ .. I Q L œ:", ~... .... ac: 0:: K a:: , " ..- - - - ~ ~ ;:: ....-.... := ~ 0 ~ - _ - i ,.- -- _11'-'· ---- '--- . ... MEMORANDUM TO: Robert A. Barcinski Acting City Manager /" FROM: William H. Greenwood I~~~. ~/flro Director of Public Utilities SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 24, 1990 - PUBLIC UTILITIES PROJECT NO. 90-43 - RFQ #90-31 FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES - WATER TREATMENT PLANT SOFTENING CONVERSION DATE: April 18, 1990 Item Before City Commission Request City Commission to approve the following: 1. Selection Committee's ranking of the Consulting Engineers short listed for RFQ #90-31 (Water Treatment Plant Softening Convers ion) : o Ranked No. 1 - CH2M Hill Engineers, Planners, Economists, Scientists o Ranked No. 2 - Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. o Ranked No. 3 - James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. 2. Authorization for staff to enter into contract negotiations with the first ranked firm (CH2M Hill) and if negotiations break down to enter into negotiations with the second ranked firm (CDM) and if negotiations break down to enter into negotiations with the third ranked firm (JMM) . Temporary funding source will be from Water and Sewer Fund Reserves. Background The RFQ proposed Scope of Services includes the Water Treatment Plant Conversion to Lime Softening, Water Distribution improve- ments, water supply system study and expansion and assistance with the Industrial Pretreatment Program. The major project is the Water Treatment Plant Conversion to Lime Softening which is an approved project in Delray Beach's Comprehensive Plan and the first step to improving water quality for its residents. Project . t ;H~ . , I . . , f ,,' will soften the potable water and improve appearance. Public perception of water quality is based upon visual observations, appearance (color), stains, useability, etc. Second step to improving water quality may require ozone in lieu of chloramines (chlorine plus ammonia) to meet tentative u,s. Environmental Protection Agency regulations on disinfection by-products. Potential range of costs is estimated at $5M to $7M and depends upon many unknown variables. Project mayor may not be required in 1993. RFQ #90-31 solicited submission of qualifications for profession- al services to be submitted on April 2, 1990. City received twelve (12) proposals which were reviewed by the Selection Committee on April 10, 1990 and three ( 3) firms were selected for the short list. Firms interviewed by the Selection Committee on April 17, 1990 were the following: 0 CDM 0 CH2M Hill 0 James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers Selection Committee members conducting the interviews were the following: 0 Bevin Beaudet, Director of Utilities, Palm Beach County 0 John Guidry, Director of Utilities, Boynton Beach 0 Joe Hancock, Director of Utilities, Boca Raton 0 Larry Martin, Deputy Director of Public Utilities, Delray Beach 0 Bill Greenwood, Director of Public Utilities, Delray Beach 0 Robert Barcinski, Acting City Manager, Delray Beach Selection Committee after reviewing the written proposals and conducting thirty (30) minute interviews unanimously ranked the three short listed firms as follows: 0 Ranked No. 1 - CH2M Hill Engineers, Planners, Economists, Scientists 0 Ranked No. 2 - Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc. 0 Ranked No. 3 - James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. Recommendation Selection Committee recommends that City Commission approve the ranking and authorize staff to enter into contract negotiations with the first ranked firm, CH2M Hill. . , I I' . , 'I ,¡ ,~ [ITY DF DELAAY BEA[H 100 N,W, 1st AVENUE DELAAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 407/243·7000 MEMORANDUM TO:' HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ~OBERT A. BARCINSKI, INTERIM CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: SHORT LIST ARCHITECTS PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS - "DECADE OF EXCELLENCE BOND" DATE: APRIL 18, 1990 City Commission is requested to apprové a short list of firms for the purpose of designing improvements to Miller Field" Veterans Park and Currie Commons Park. All the projects are part of our Decade of Excellence Bond Program. Twenty firms submitted letters of interest and six (6) firms have been short-liste4 to date. Additional decisions before Commission include the following: 1. Should the work be divided and awarded to three firms? 2. Selection Process - Does Commission wish to interview all six firms and then vote or do you want staff to interview and make a recommendation to Commission as we are doing with the Public Utilities-Lime Softening project. My recommendation would be to award to one firm and direct staff to interview the six (6) firms short-listed and present a recommendation to City Commission. Attached are memoranda received from the Director of Parks and Recreation. RAB : kwg . , I . ~ . , t 19 ~ . 'I .~ ... _1"·'- . " ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Robert A. Barcinski Interim City Manager FROM: Joe Weldon Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Decade. of Excellence Projects DATE: April 11, 1990 Per your memo of April 5, 1990 the following applies to the Decade of Excellence Bond Issue and the short listing submitted by the Committee. l. The short listing was a random listing and not in priority order. 2. I recommend we hire the architect to revise the master plan for Miller Park completed by Tindell Associates in 1986. Some revisions we may want to consider are the location of the concession stand, possible additional parking, etc. Once the master plan is complete and approved by City Cormnission, the Baseball School would be responsible for the grading, sodding and irrigation of all the az:.eas on a reimbursable basis with the City and the develop~nt of the major league and multipurpose field. The City would be responsible for the installation of the parking areas, concession stand, and lighting. Susan Ruby i:; presently working on an agreement for Cormnission approval between the City and Baseball School similar to the agreement for the renovation of the stadium field and the construction of "Little Fenway" at Miller Park. 3 . The description of each park project is as follows: Miller Park - C~:mstruction of major league baseball field, multipurpose field, concessions/restrooms, lighting, parking, etc. The amount approved in the bond issue was $375,000. Currie Commons Park - Construction of little league diamonds, multipurpose field, concessions/restrooms, lighting, parking, etc. The amount approved in the bond issue was $230,000. Veterans' Park - Develop as a passive park that blends aesthetically with the intracoastal waterway. Some elements to consider are the construction of marginal docks along the seawall to allow temporary docking for boats to visit the park, restaurants, shops, etc¡ the reduction or removal of the public works lift station, new irrigation, sod, landscaping, playground equipment, pavilion, etc. The amount approved in the bond issue was $500,000. ~ f . . r ; ; ~ , . i ~ .., I .. -<. ~ .) ~ Robert A. Barcinski Decade of Excellence Projects April 11, 1990 . ,Page 2 Contact has already been made with the Department of Natural Resources concerning Land and Water Conservation Funds ($150,000 maximum) and Florida Recreation Assistance Development Program ($120,000 maximum) to leverage our existing bond monies. I would recornrnend that we apply for a Land and Water Grant for Veterans' Park and a FRDAP Grant for Currie Cornrnons Park. These grant programs become available in the October - November with an application deadline date of about December 31, 1990, We would probably know whether we were awarded a grant by the Spring of 1991- In order to be eligible for the grant, construction can not yet have begun. Ideally, I would like to have Cornrnission approval of master plans for Veterans' . Park and Currie Cornrnons Park by July - August and then apply for the aforementioned grant programs for these two parks. As you know, we currently have a grant pending before the Florida Inland Navigational District for about $158,000 for the replacement of seawalls and marginal docks at Veterans' Park. We will know May 25th if we have received a grant from FIND with funding available on October 1, 1990. If we receive the grant, it is hoped that all permits, specitications, bidding, etc. will be complete and construction ca~. begin in October or November. The seawall and marginal docks should be complete by the time we knew whether we had received a Land and Water Grant for the renovations of Veterans' Park its~lf. Additionally, the high school has asked us to act as the general contractor for the renovations and lighting of the multipurpose field at the high school that we are doing cooperatively with the School Board. I do not anticipate this being too difficult and should we need any site plan work or specifications to be prepared we can probably use Gee & Jensen, the City's contract Engineering firm. Parks and Recreation JW: j mh REF:JW083 ~ , f ~ . ; , j ~ " .. r '.-..... ~ " ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Robert A. Barcinski Interim City Manager FROM: Joe Weldon Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Architectural and Engineering Firms for Decade of Excellence Bond Issue DATE: April 2, 1990 The attached list of firms submitted letters of interest for architectural and engineering services for Miller Park, Currie Commons Park, and Veterans' Park. As a reminder, Miller Park will be developed in conjunction with The Baseball School to include baseball fields, multipurpose fields, lighting, concessions stands, parking lots, etc. I would recommend that we enter into an agr-eement with The Baseball School where we reimburse them our share for the grading, sod, irrigation, etc. in the development of the fields with the City responsible for the installation of lights, parking lot, and restrooms/concessions. Veterans' Park will be developed as a passive park along the intracoastal with Currie Commons being renovated to include baseball diamonds, multipurpose fields, parking lot, lighting, etc. , The review committee consisted of Gates Castle, City Engineer; Ted Glas, Purchasing Director; and myself. Although the review committee felt all firms were capable of doing the projects, we recommend that City Commission select from the following firms: 1.) SWA Group 2. ) Wallace Roberts & Todd 3. ) Shoup/McKinley Architects & Planners 4. ) Digby Bridges, Marsh & Associates 5. ) Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates 6. ) Currie Schneider Associates AIA, PA City Commission has the option of awarding all three projects to one architect or individually as they see fit. I have attached all the Letters of Interest for your and City Commission's review. Joe Weldon Director of Parks and Recreation REF:JW078 cc: Gates Castle, City Engineer Ted Glas, Purchasing Director ~ , I ~ . t ~ , '·1'1 ... I , ,,_...... . ~ ~ LETIERS OF INTEREST 90-30 Parks Development l. SWA Group , 11. Scharf Associates 401 Fairway Drive 3407 H.W. 9th Ave. 2nd Floor Ft. Lauderdale. Florida 33309 Deerfield Beach, Florida 33441 ....--- - 12. Digby Bridges. Marsh & Associates P.A. 2. Wallace Roberts & Todd 124 H.E. 5th Ave. 191 Giralda Ave. Penthouse Delray Beach. Florida 33483 Coral Gables. Florida 33134 13. Bruce Bovard & Associaces. Inc. 3. James E. Neuhaus, Inc. 550 Bilt.ore Way 4114 North1ake Blvd. Suite 840 Su1.te 201 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Paa Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 14. Mock, Roos & Associates. Inc. 4. Gee & Jenson 5720 Corporate Way One Harvard Circle West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 P.O. Box 24600 , West Paa Beach, Florida 33416-4600 15. Keith & Schnars, P;'A. 6500 N. Andrews Ave. 5. Construx Archi.tects Inc. Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33309 420 Lincoln Rd. .. Suite 408 16. W R Frizzell Architects. Inc. Miami Beach. Florida 33139 5600 PGA Blvd., Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens. Florida 33418 6. Russell & Axon Inc. Suite 115 17. Edward D. Stone. Jr. and Associates 951 Broken Sound Parkway 1512 E. Brovard Blvd. Boca Raton, Florida 33487 Suite 110 Ft. Lauderdale. Florida 33301 7. Ktmley-Born & Associates Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive 18. Currie Schneider Associates ALA. PA West Palm Beach. Florida 33407 25 Seabreeze Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33483 8. Shoup/McKinley Archi.tects & Planners , Suite 19 Spanish River Plaza 19. ,Slattery & Root Architects 500 N.E. Spanish River Blvd. 2101 N.W. 2nd Ave. Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 9. Williams. Hatfield, & Stoner Inc. 20. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan. Inc. 2312 Wilton Drive 1400 Centreparlc. Blvd. Fc. Lauderdale, Florida 33305 Suite 200 West Palm Beach. Florida 33401 10. Shermeta Associates Inc. ~01 S.E. 6th Ave. , Delray Beach. Florida 33483 . I r . : , f ~ ,'. C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: CHERYL LEVERETT, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT III ~ ~ \~ &--J ~1./' -..os ,..H'V'_ :.~V FROM: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1990 CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST TO ALLOW A DAY CARE AT 206 S.W. 13TH AVENUE (Little Lee Christian Academy) ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of conditional use request for a day care in a RI-A zoning district. The facility will have a maximum of 52 children, The site under consideration is located on S.W. 13th Avenue just north of Carver Middle School. BACKGROUND: There is no development history of the site nor has there been recent development activity in the area. The request involves conversion of an existing home to a day care facility which will be capable of accommodating 52 children. The request is straight forward and complies with land development codes. Please refer to the P&Z Staff Report (copy in the City Manager's Office) for complete background and analysis. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this conditional use on April 16, 1990. There was no public comment. The request was forwarded with a recommendation of approval subject to conditions as set forth in the staff report. The recommendation was unanimous. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approval of the requested conditional use request pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board. Attachments: * Cover sheet from the P&Z Staff Report of April 16, 1990 * Reduction of site plan DJK/#61/CCLEE.TXT ~ð ",.J PLAJ'\JN' I NG 8 ZO~ iNG BOARD --- STAFF REPORT --- CITY OF OELRAY BEACH MEET fNG LATE: APRIL 16, 1990 AGem ITEM: III,C. Ilr~: CONDITIONAL USE, LITTLE LEE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY (DAY CARE) WITH ATTENDANT SITE PLAN AT 206 S,W. 13th AVENUE . L . iW', ",. "fI' RK: .... : ~~~"'q' '- : w--;-,., '. .... ~.- ---- ~~ -:-~ ^...~ :---~_ _ _ . 1 T.'""JIi ~ " I I ~,,~_ . ' t ~.:.::. ~~.:: ... ;¡", . .. ¡-;:- A· 'v' I . ,. ,.~. ~- 2: .. ~- ~ I -::-;- =-. _. -1 --=--~--=- i · Dn'I' 1'__ . \ .; ....~. It. ~.._:: IC' .:~ 1('.' .... '- :" ~ . I' I . ~ ~ L, r2 n ~. Ž: III-~ .KJJ.., J I' . ~ '1r"t ~ j A: ~ ~ ~; .' ;. ' . I. t'W- -r ";J ~ l~ .~ -: ~- .... "'~- ~ :n.;-.a I. 'J . ~,;~ I ~ I '... . , ~ ~. .:. · I J -. · I.. '; .. I .. ~ . i ~ A'" * J "-:"'$ , to. I· f/IIr" JJ '.. . .". . ® ,<, .... 'OP ~ . e " . I....... I'T' ~ -." .. N ' ~ ~tIJ:Jà f ~~ 'iI'" "_: , ,.... .~. , .~ ;";i"'""'.'.~¡' r.··~ ~ . . U.' ~ _.. ~":" . . ~. I ~~. '~"'¡!I~ J"" " I' ,'. . " ' . . ~ ~~ r t2 ., I II IØ It I ~' , . .;, : . , ~. ~'.I ~~ . ~-_ ! GENERAL DATA: OWner..............,...........,Rev. Leonard and Mearlene Josey Agent....,.....,.,........,.....same as above Location........................One lot south of the southwest corner of Southwest 2nd St. and Southwest 13th Avenue Property Size................... .32 Acres City Land Use Plan..............Residential Low Density City Zoning..............,..... .R-1A (Single Family) Adjacent Zoning........,....,...North of the subject property is zoned RM-6 (Multiple Family), East, South, and West is zoned R-1A. Existing Land Use",....,.,.....Single Family Residence Proposed Land Use.,.." "..",.,Child Care Facility (52 children) Water Service.....,..",."..., .Existing on-site Sewer Service...."".""."."Existing on-site AGENDA ITEM: III. C, ~ I I ~ . f ~ , I' ~ \ -... .... 1 ~ /- ~ ,- ~ ~ ~'\ I l .( ,~- \ \ .. ) } ~ · ,y \. / / \ /',' :-.-=:..)- /' / ,--:..: . . '-- ' _." ~t. ...·I.I"L 1\..L~':" ...:..... .. l , ao-.r'r., _ ~rJ·ç.,-. ..:.... r\:.t4~\t.. fU _ ÇJ'; __ '- "¡.,,,,4ot l"rl~ !r: /-~. If L\'.G. _ . , ! _ .' ,1. . _. "rE.~\."-lL.J PL...'" /i....¡;.~ \ ('/; \D =:) -- ~ - .\ T . ( -- I L ¡;;o'''''''.... _v I"£",~f I (}"I 7C' ~. F ,) ,\,,); 'ct!; ,,"""J....... fo\.A.;, ...,q... -_/ "___ :' . i ." \ , .~~~~ II 7- " l rt.Þ-'( ~"'vW~£Joií~ 7. I,n ~ ?,....c.. eo. ;:: '~ i '\ ~"!!"!..~':- "...r.. -[" { > ¡ \\. ..¡ / ...., I = ~ , E'.~ T. _.. " J II .....~"- -. " ,=- Co 'ttl í '" ~ ,\ ~ -:."_.. - . ...~ - í ~ .:;:wr... . . ':1- I ,\ i lAP",," ~ +- r>.L.. ~:< r "......T ", ¡v..... ~ / ~? or- ~,............., & ~. ~ '-' (J. <-. _'\'1' .& { "1 >Þ) . ....;. ""~" IJ~-I.I ~.- t:1 "M_ -'-,,~ (/ ~ ' [.\ F\..,..,. (,"';" C> ~ . I; ~ 7. 7 [ \.ì I ... .. ~ I )1 \ , '. ' ,.:- ?o - I .\~ ! I t,'11 ) ,(,\ \-.~.. I{ .. 4,. ~ ' , _ . 7 J' '" . ~ ."'../l- t r ~...:... ....' , I Î " <tt!·~ IY.\,..... ) ...... _ .;-.-#.:,... _.~ ·....fl'. I , ~__ fe S -. '-... /~. I _ I L1-'j'" /ö&.I'" _<'J- ~ I \"." \ . I I~\' ¡~r ":&,- 1 ,,1 i I ..J, v.' ,.\1 "\. 4 . ...')....t_ . wr. Y' I \ ~, . " . ') . . ." .( ....Nf>T ~',T,,-,. ----,;--. -. _.---;---....~. \~ '." N I '"" I ø.... '----- '\ \ \ II . . ( '"" ,. '-'I , PI.'- - .\ \ \ \ \ 1 '-- '" \ , L ~ II --. ,'" \' . J ~ ' \. \ ,'~ - ' _ ,".__"_ L '\ -r-.I 4 ~ ~I " \J f - "' G'11i 2+ ~ _ 'J' ..i;: ( .... j 'l I ¡ I I ~ I ' ..¡ , : I Il!î :.--+-. .: I \ _I i/.\ '111 . I () I : I. I '\\ I _ .~ _~ ! '\:" " J -¥- - . . ,. . I I ~I I I !'7.. ill" ,"<I .v·. u. . ' Ie> "'~'w..,. -.-..' - ..J I!. l '!I' - ~ ,__ i I .' ~ "'JOI..."" .. ...~,~~~ '! .. ~,' \.:1 .- 1 I , / / ~ \.. . ' " i _ ì __ '-- L ..--. ,. . '. - --- I - I 1-- . -n", Ii' J\ : I \ . ! I' (' \ I I \ E...,l. ""..,~ \.....£, I ~_-.J ~ . , , . ~ . , j ~ , i C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION TO: . ~L ~EVERETT' ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT III ~, .~~~ ,.0 FROM: D D J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1990 CONSIDERATION OF A SITE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 15 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VENETIAN AND MIRAMAR DRIVES (Heritage Manor) ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of a site and development plan for a one acre parcel which is zoned RM-15. The plan depicts a 15 unit condominium complex. The site is located at the southeast corner of Venetian and Miramar Drives. BACKGROUND: This site was originally purchased by the City in 1971 as a fire station site. In 1988, a decision was made not to locate the fire station at this location but, rather, to sell the property under its current zoning (RM-15) and to dedicate the proceeds to the construction of Fire Station #2 on Andrews Avenue. Such a sale was consummated in March, 1990. The proposed development complies with land development codes and consists of a structure with one level of parking and four levels of residential use. The unit count complies with the current zoning. While the unit count exceeds that allowed by the Comprehensive Plan, the application has been processed since the use (multiple family) is accommodated by the Future Land Use Map and the matter of limiting the density is to be addressed in the overall revisions to the Local Development Regulations (LDRs). Please refer to the Planning and Zoning Staff Report for a complete description of the project and its analysis. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board considered this site plan at a regular meeting held on April 16, 1990. There was public comment in opposition voiced by Betty Matthews who questioned its compatibility with an adjacent single story development. Douglas Brown of 123 Venetian Drive spoke in opposition of a 4-5 story structure. Mr. seddorf, owner of property on Venetian Drive, also spoke in opposition. The request was forwarded with a recommendation of denial based upon the project being incompatible with adjacent land use (Standard J) and being out of scale with the character of the area in terms of height and intensity (Standard B). The Board's recommendation was made via the failure (on a 1-6 vote) of a motion for approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, denial of the requested site and development plan pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board. Attachments: AI * The P&Z Staff Report of April 16, 1990 ",' I ~. L J-i(\J [\ 1 f\JG 8- lU. i f~G ~uHHU CITY --- STAFF REPORT OF OElRAY BERCH - - - MEETING mTE: APR ILl 6 , 1 9 9 0 AG~ I1EH: IV. A, I TEM: SITE PLAN, HERITAGE MANOR MULTI-FAMILY STRUCTURE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MlRAMAR AND VENETIAN DRIVES, GENERAL . DATA: OWner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . , , Stipan Group, Inc. Agent....,........."", ....... . Dave Danner Imre M. Ereg, Architects Location............ ...........,Southeast corner of Miramar Drive and Venetian Drive. Property Size...................l.045 Acres City Land Use Plan..............5-12 units/acre Medium Density-Residential City Zoning..............,.,." ,RM-15 (Multiple Family) Adjacent Zoning......... ....,...North, South, East, and West of the subject property are zoned RM-15. Existing Land Use,......, ",.."Vacant Land Proposed Land Use..,.",. .", .,,5 story 15 unit condominium development Wat:er Service................,..Existing 8" water main along Venetian Drive and a 2" main along Miramar Drive. Sewer Service...,....,..",.." ,Existing 8" sanitary sewer along Venetian Drive and Miramar Drive, ~lv.~ ~ I f . ~ . f : t ~ . f. i ." ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The action before the Board is that of making a recommendation on a site and development plan for "Heritage Manor", a 15 unit condominium development, The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Venetian Drive and Miramar Drive and contains approximately 1.045 acres, BACKGROUND: This property was purchased by the City in 1971 for the public purpose of siting a fire station. The 1979 Land Use Map placed most properties which were publicly owned under a P (Public) designation: however, there was no text or other material which identified a specific use for most of the Public properties. In 1986 a Utility Tax Bond targeted, among other items, funding for construction of a fire station on this site. However, at the time of rezoning (from RM-15 (Multiple-Family) to CF (Community Facilities» a decision was made not to proceed with locating the fire station on the site. It was further decided that it would be appropriate and necessary to sell the property and to have the proceeds from the sale aid in the funding of constructing fire station #2 (at Andrews Avenue), since the property was purchased from a general obligation bond for the specific purpose of fire suppression services. In order for the property to be sold for development the land use plan had to be amended to a land use designation that would be compatible with the existing zoning of RM-15. On December 15, 1988, the City Commission approved the Land Use Plan Amendment from P (Public) to MF-15 (Multiple Family - 15 units/acre), thus allowing for private development to occur. Under the new Comprehensive Plan the property, clarified as RM (5-12 units per acre) . Since the zoning has not yet been awarded to delete the RM-15 designation, this application for a density greater than 12 units/acre can be accepted for processing. The Stipan Group, Inc. the new property owner has made application to the City of Delray Beach for site and development plan approval to construct a 15 unit condominium development on the subject property. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The development proposal is to construct a five story 15 unit condominium development. The subject property contains 45,541 sq. ft. , allowing 15 units (In the RM-15 district, 8,000 sq.ft. of lot area is required for the first two units, with 2,735 sq. ft. of lot area for each additional unit). The proposal includes a subgrade parking area with four floors of residential units above. The garage will have one access point along Miramar Drive with an overhead door. Guest parking spaces and a convenient drop-off area to the central lobby is provided in the front of the building (off Venetian). ~ ~ . , , " ,~ P&Z Staff Report Heritage Manor - Site Plan Page 2 Two types of units will be provided: the Maple Unit, which contains approximately 2,020 sq,ft., and the Palm Unit containing 2,140 sq. ft. Both units provide two bedrooms and a den/study which can be utilized as a third bedroom. The third, fourth and fifth floors contain four units each. The second floor will contain three units and utilized as a clubhouse. Recreation amenities include a 20' X 36' swimming pool with a deck, a jacuzzi with a diameter of 8 ft., two shuffle board courts and clubhouse. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS: The site plan has been reviewed using criteria outlined in Section 173.865 "Standards for Evaluating Site and Development Plan Applications". A revised site plan was ·submitted on April 4, 1990 and the following review is based on that submittal. Standard A (Sufficiency of Materials) The applicant has not yet provided a statement indicating the condition of the existing drainage structures to which the drainage will outfall from the site. The applicant has been advised that if the system cannot accommodate the additional drainage, a modification of the storm water system or the site plan, to accommodate on-site drainage, will be required. Otherwise, the submission is sufficient to adequately analyze the project. Standard B (Impact of the Proposed Use) The development site is within, and is bordered to the north, south, east and west by RM-15 zoning. The existing land use to the north and west of the property are two-story story condominiums, south is a one-story condominium, and east is a single family dwelling. The development proposal is out of character with the adjacent properties with regards to both height and intensity. Although the proposal is more intensive, it is still within the density requirements and height limitations of the RM-15 zoning district. During the hearing associated with the Fire Station issue, testimony from the neighborhood was to the position that multiple family housing was a preferred alternative to a single story fire station. This previous position of the neighborhood is supportive of a finding that the use and intensity is appropriate. ~ , f . ~ . t ; ~ . i ,.. P&Z Staff Report Heritage Manor - Site Plan Page 3 Standard C (Ingress and Egress) Sufficient access has been provided to the site via two points of ingress and egress, A 24 ft. accessway along Miramar Drive serves the parking garage and the refuse pick-up area. The second access point is along Venetian Drive via a 15 ft, ingressway and a 24 ft. egressway, which serves the drop-off area, guest and resident parking. Pursuant to Section 172,17(A)(2), a 6 ft. sidewalk is required along Miramar Drive and Venetian Drive. Standard D (Off-Street Parking and Loading) Pursuant to Section 173.773(A)(2)(c), 15 units containing two or more bedrooms require two spaces per unit and, one-half of a guest parking space for each unit for a total of 38 (30 regular and 8 guest) . Twenty-three resident parking spaces have been provided in the underground parking garage with 16 parking spaces provided in front of the building. Two handicapped parking spaces have been provided adjacent to the entrance of the building (total 39). Standard E (Screens and Buffers) Pursuant to Code Sections 159.29 and 15~.30, one tree every 40 feet and a hedge is required adjacent to public rights-of-way and abutting properties. The proposed landscape treatment exceeds these Code requirements. In addition, a 6 ft. high C.B.S. privacy wall will be provided along the east property line and decorative fencing will be provided along the north, south and west property lines. Standard F (Drainage) Drainage from this project is to flow into the City's storm sewer system. Initially, the City's Engineering Department requested a study of the existing system's ability to accommodate additional drainage from this development. The Engineering Department has deleted its original comment and has requested that the Project Engineer provide a statement with regard to the condition of the existing structures to which the drainage will outfall. As of April 10th, a statement had not been provided. The applicant has been advised that if the municipal system cannot accommodate the additional drainage, a modification of the storm water system or the site plan to accommodate on-site drainage will be required. ~ ~ . 1 . ,1'4 P&Z Staff Report Heritage Manor - Site Plan Page 4 Standard G (Sanitary Sewers) Existinq 8" sewer mains are located along the west right-of-way of Venetian Drive and along the center line of Miramar Drive. Sewer service will be provided via extending a lateral to the 8" main along the centerline of Miramar Drive and an 8" service line from the right-of-way line of Miramar to the building. Standard H (Utilities) Water service will be provided via a 3" service lateral extension from the existing 8" main located along the east side of Venetian Drive. Fire suppression for the building and underground parking garage will be provided by internal sprinklers via a 6" fire line from the existing 8" water main along Venetian Drive. The Fire Department has indicated that a Siamese connection must be provided. Standard I (Recreation and Open Space) Recreation amenities include a 20' X 36' swimming poo 1, an 8' diameter jacuzzi, shuffle board courts. In addition, a clubhouse will be located on the second floor. An open space requirement is not listed in the RM-15 district regulations, however there is a ground floor building area requirement. This requirement states that "the total ground floor building area for all buildings and structures shall not exceed 40% of the total lot area". The total ground floor building area for this development is 28% of the site. Standard J (Site Development) The development will have an impact on adjacent properties with regard to the height of the building. The structure is attractive in appearance and, with the landscape treatment that is proposed, will present an aesthetically pleasing development. The development should enhance the value of adjacent properties rather than cause depreciation. Other Site Plan Matters: The proposed wall at the east and south property lines is situated beneath overhead power lines and above underground telephone lines. Such structures are not allowed within utility easements; however, specific approval from the appropriate utility companies would allow the wall to be situated. ~ I f' . f ~ : .~ P&Z Staff Report Heritage Manor - Site Plan Page 5 Notwithstanding the above, the applicant may provide an alternative proposal should the request be denied by the utility companies. Resolution of this item could be in a manner acceptable to the Planning Director prior to submitting for a building permit. TECHNICAL ITEMS: On April 4th, the applicant submitted revised plans in response to staff's initial comments. The following items are based upon the revised site plan submittal. 1- Per Code Section 173,031(J), trellises may not extend more than ten feet from the rear of the principal building. 2. Indicate site lighting on landscape plan to avoid any possible conflicts with proposed tree locations. 3. Remove curbing from right-of-ways. 4. Provide edge of pavement markings for channelizing traffic in the parking garage (Show on both sides of accessway). 5. All pavement markings shall be white, not yellow as indicated. 6. Indicate the 6 ft. backup maneuvering area with pavement markings. 7. Provide backflow preventers for the fire line and water service line. 8. Provide a fire hydrant and a Siamese connection at the south side of the west entryway within 15 feet of the pavement on Venetian Drive. (The revised site plan indicated the location of the Siamese connection just north of the handicapped parking space). 9. On the Engineering Plans indicate the size of the water meter, location of the backflow preventers, the Siamese connection and the fire hydrant. (The Engineering Department has recommended that the drainage inlets near the drive on Venetian be located in the grass area west of the proposed location and that a 1 ft. concrete or asphalt apron be provided. ) 10. Provide a note on the plans that an approved fire sprink.ler system will be provided. ~ . I . I' . , '! , ,¡',I P&Z Staff Report Heritage Manor - Site Plan Page 6 11, Pursuant to the State of Florida's Handicapped Accessibility Requirements Manual, adopted in January, 1990, 29 ft. is required for the two handicapped parking spaces, whereas 24 ft. is provided (Please refer to the manual for the specifications). 12. Proposed 8 ft. fire access at north parking lot serves no purpose. Revise plans to accommodate landscape material in lieu of asphalt. 13. Coordinate trellis construction materials selection with relevant code requirements. 14. Stripe the refuse "pick-up" area as a non-parking area. 15. Conflicts between the 3" water service line and landscaping at the north area of the site will require shifting two trees within the landscaped area circular entranceway. REVIEW BY OTHERS: COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD: The development proposal was before the C.A.B. (Community Appearance Board) on March 21, 1990, for preliminary review. The Board had a concern with the maintenance of the fabric awnings. The applicant, Dave Danner, stated that maintenance would be worded into the condominium documents. Final review of the building elevations and the landscape plan has been scheduled for the April 11, 1990 C.A.B. meeting. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: The subject property is not located within the Community Redevelopment Area and does not require review by the C.R.A. (Community Redevelopment Agency). However, since the subject property is adjacent to the area, as a courtesy, the project was presented to the C.R.A. at its meeting of April 9th. The C.R.A. expressed concerns with the height of the building and its compatibility with adjacent properties. ASSESSMENT: The proposed development does meet of the criteria specified in "Standards for Evaluating Site and Development Plan Applications", however the areas of concern that have been identified are Standard F (drainage) and Standard J regarding the developments compatibility with the adjacent properties. ~ I , ,. . 1 ~ ~ ..¡ P&Z Staff Report Heritage Manor - Site Plan Page 7 As stated previously under Standard F (drainage), a statement must be provided by a Professional Engineer indicating that the existing structures to which the drainage wiil outfall can accommoda te the addi tional drêi,inage. If the system cannot accommodate the additional drainage, a modification of the storm water system or the site plan, to accommodate on-site drainage, will be required. The proposed development is in compliance with the RM-15 zoning district regulations, however, there is a concern with the compatibility of the development with the adjacent land uses, in that the height of the proposed structure is at least three stories above the adjacent structures. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1- Continue with direction and concurrence. 2. Recommend approval of the site and development plan for Heritage Manor based upon positive findings pursuant to Section 173.867 (Ten Standards for Evaluating Site and Development Plan Applications) subject to conditions. 3 . Recommend denial based upon the failure to make a positive finding to Standard J (site development), that the development is not compatible with adjacent properties. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend approval of the Site and Development Plan for Heritage Manor based upon positive findings pursuant to Section 173.867 (Ten Standards for Evaluating Site and Development Plan Applications) subject to the following conditions: 1. A plat must be recorded prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2. That a statement be provided by a professional Engineer indicating that the condition of the existing structures to which the drainage will outfall can accommodate the drainage from the proposed development. If the system cannot accommodate the additional drainage, a modification of the storm water system or the site plan, to accommodate on-site drainage, will be required. 3. Provide verification from Florida Power and Light and Southern Bell that the location of the wall is acceptable. If the proposed location is not acceptable, provide a viable alternative. ~ I , . . I , ~ ,H~ P&Z Staff Report Heritage Manor - S~_¿ Plan Page 8 4. That revised plans be submitted addressing the comments listed under the "Technical Item" section of this report, REF/JAC#3/A:MANOR.TXT ~ , ,. . , ~ H ~ -, - '. - - -y.",. - ~I" '" _ Oq, ' -" - -y~ ~ " - ," ~ 'HQ. '-:r - - 1- - r- ~ ~~, " , - " ( ::j - ~ .. - þ , . ~.. ~/'.. ...;. - / , ^ '-\ .' r f ~ .,. . .~.. .. . , - - .,. , \" , . ~~ , t ¡¡..{~ "..; to , ) , "~ ~ I. " , . < ,~.f - ': i:i. " ~ " \\ i' t --- 1 )' ... " , . ~~ ,- . - , " ,I ii , ) I I . ) ~ 21 ~i ~ ¡H c .. : ~ ~¡T! 1"- ! ..:]' ~~ ~ ~ --,~ -:' n" < )... ~ II þ~ .' , .. \ .. ~ '- - ~,:: ;: ., 7: ~ t ..' : .~ SI ",ACK n ~ ' .',' . .:, ~ V'1, ~ ; ----- ; ." ~ :' ,":-' ~ /~ , ~ t\(\ , . ! , " .... ÞI : . z , t:: . ~ - ~~ I ~" i ~ .~ -- L¡' : '!.-. , . ~ . 'I:] '.~ þ , I . ..-...'.-...-...... , c . .... I" ' '. .. - I I I I , .....- --: r' ,~ :~:1 - .' po -- ,~ ~ ~ ' J' i~ ..... ~ · 6 I ,::¡ ~ J : ' <; ~ ~ I': "': .\ l' I ~ ,~ ~ ~ , -; ,% ~ '. - " \ I. " .' . ,~/~': " - = ! - - ~ - .: ~\''.J\\ ~ - - ¡%~~/ ~ ! ~ - . » · - p ,¡ ! . - · , -.. . > ~ > > - = , " · --...-- .- ~ , . I . ,. , ~ I,.j MEMORANDUM TO: Robert A, Barcinski Acting City Manager FROM: ~arty Ritchason ~ Personnel/Labor Relations Director SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM THROUGH JOB SERVICES OF FLORIDA DATE: April 12, 1990 The following recommendation is being made to approve the Summer Youth Employ- ment Program in conjunction with Job Services of Florida: Program Objective: To provide job opportunities for youth which familiarize them with the job market, provide skill training, pro- vide training on good work habits and job seeking skills, and to complete needed City-wide seasonal pro- jects, Program will provide meaningful employment ex- perience with a tangible outcome which will be benefi- cial to the City and to the participants, Program Duration: 7 weeks during the summer months Participant Ages: 16 years to 21 years old Number of Participants Approximately twelve (12) based upon anticipated departmental requests Work Week: Not to exceed 40 hours per week Hourly Rate: $4,50 per hour Residency: Delray Beach residents only Other Eligibility Requirements: None Restrictions: 18 years and older to operate power equipment Pre-Screening & Selection: Pre-screening will be conducted by the Florida Job Ser- vice; Department Heads will conduct interviews and make selections with the City Manager's approval. Recommended $15,000 - Funding: Departmental Contingency Accounts Positions: Based upon past placement through the Summer Youth Pro- gram, we anticipate utilizing the participants in Cleri- cal, Recreational, Maintenance and other related positions, Placement within City departments will be based upon departmental requests which will be reviewed and selectively authorized by the City Manager, ~ I t . : ~~ , ~ . MEMORANDUM TO: Robert A, Barcinski Acting City Manager I.'.,..... FROM: ~'Marty Ritchason Personnel/Labor Relations Director SUBJECT: SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM - SPONSORED BY PIC (PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL DATE: April 12, 1990 The following recommendation is being made to approve the contract between the City of Delray Beach and the Private Industry Council (PIC): Program Objective: To provide job opportunities funded by the Private In- dustry Council for youth within Palm Beach County, which familiarize them with the job market, provide skill training, provide training on good work habits and job seeking skills, and to complete needed City-wide seasonal projects, Program will provide meaningful employment experience with a tangible outcome which will be beneficial to the City and to the participants, Program Duration: 8 weeks during the summer months Number of Participants: Twelve (12) to fifteen (15), based upon anticipated departmental requests P~rticipant Ages: 16 years to 21 years old Work Week: Not to exceed 40 hours per week Compensation: Private Industry Council will compensate each partici - pant as provided in the contract, Funding: Participants will be paid directly by the Private Industry Council, No funding from the City will be re- quired, Residency/ Participants must reside within Palm Beach County, Par- Restrictions: ticipants must be certified economically eligible (dis- advantaged) by PIC, . f !' . ~3 , ~ .¡;.¡ Agreement No. WORKSITE AGREEMENT FOR WORK EXPERIENCE 1990 SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PROGRAM This Agreement is made for provision of Work Experience for the 1990 Summer Youth Employment and Training Program under Title II- B of the Job Training Partnership Act (the"Act") between the Palm Beach County Private Industry Council, Inc. (the "Private Industry Council"), of 324 Datura street, suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (407) 659-52l3 and: organization: City of Delray Beach Address: 100 N, W, 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Fl. Zip: 33444 IRS No.: Phone No.: 407 243-7080 contact: Patsy Fox Description of organization: Municipality Io TERM: The term of this Agreement shall be from June 18, 1990 through August 7, 1990; provided, that the Private Industry Council may terminate this Agreement at any time prior to the end of the term by notifying the Worksite Employer in writing. II. WORKSITE EMPLOYER REPRESENTATIONS: The Worksite Employer represents that it: (1) is a private or public non-profit organization, and (2) is capable of providing Work Experi- ence in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. III. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED: The Worksite Employer will provide Work Experience in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, in the numbers and for the occupations described in the Outline of Skills to Be Acquired and the Description of Worksites attached hereto and incorporated herein. NOTE: outline of Skills to Be Acquired section on page 8 of this Agreement must be completed in detail. A. Referral and Selection 1. The Private Industry Council, directly or through the Job Service of Florida, shall refer to the Worksite Employer for each position, one or more individuals, (if available), certified as eligible for participation hereunder. Such referral activities shall continue throughout the term of this Agreement, in order to assure to the greatest extent possible the filling of all positions. 2. The Worksite Employer shall select individuals from among those referred, notifying the Private Industry Council on the form provided for this purpose, and retaining a copy of such form for each selected individual (hereinafter referred to as a "participant"). 1 t , ^ ~ . , , Ì , ,. ."., B. Orientation/Pre-emplo~~ent Skills Traininq 1. Prior to commencing employment, each participant shall take part in an orientation and pre-employment Skills Training Session conducted by the Palm Beach County Private Industry Council. During this program, each participant shall be provided appropriate employability skills training and orientation to the Work Experience program. c. Employment 1- Participants shall be provided positions under conditions designed to result in the participant's successful attainment of entry level skills and work habits required of such position or occupation as set forth in the attached Outline of Skills to Be Acquired. 2. Each position shall provide a meaningful employment experience, with a tangible outcome which benefits the Worksite Employer, the community and others. 3. Each participant shall work under the guidance of a supervisor. Each worksite supervisor is allowed to supervise and train a maximum of ten (10) SYETP participants. 4. Employment shall be conducted at worksites designated on the attached Outline of Skills to Be Provided and Description of Worksites. 5. Supervisors shall ensure that participants are provided adequate equipment and supplies for their assigned work. 6. Participants shall not be permitted to work in excess of the number of hours stipulated. No participant shall be permitted to work (1) more than forty (40) hours per week, (2) more than a total of three hundred twenty (320) hours, (3) before June 15, 1990 or (4) after August 15, 1990. 7. All employment and training activities hereunder shall be conducted in accordance with the conditions set forth in the attached Assurances and certifications and with applicable law. D. Traininq l. The Worksite Employer shall provide each participant with meaningful, well-supervised job training consistent with the duties and responsibilities of the job position, and designed to ensure successful attainment of entry level skills and work habits required of such position or occupation as set forth in the attached Outline of Skills to Be Acquired. 2 ~ , . ~ . : , ~ . j.·1 2. Such training shall include an orientation to the organization and work station, including but not limited to the Worksite Employer's policies and procedures, work schedules, break schedules, lunch periods, days off, and hours expected to be at work. E. Supervision 1. Employment and training hereunder shall be provided through qualified supervisors, who shall be (1) regular employees of the Worksite Employer, (2) experienced in the work to be performed by each participant supervised, and (3) determined by the Worksite Employer to be appropriate to supervise such participants. 2. The Private Industry Council shall make appropriate arrangements for orientation and instruction of supervisors, employing Supervisor's Manuals to be provided by the Private Industry Council. Worksite Employers, their supervisors and participants will all be provided with a manual outlining the policies and procedures to be followed during the program. 3. The Worksite Employer shall maintain a ratio of one (1) supervisor to a maximum of ten (10) participants, including provision of a back-up supervisor during the absence of any supervisor. 4. Each supervisor shall review the performance of each of his/her participants every two weeks during the term of this Agreement, employing the evaluation form provided for this purpose by the Private Industry Council, shall review such evaluations with each participant, and shall submit such evaluations to the Private Industry Council, retaining copies with this Agreement. IV. COMPENSATION 1. The Private Industry Council shall compensate each participant at the rate of $4.00 per hour for hours worked during each two-week pay period, upon receipt of proper documentation as specified below. In no event shall JTPA funds be used to compensate a participant for hours in excess of those provided for such participant under Part III of this Agreement. Total payments to a participant hereun- der shall not exceed ONE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY DOLLARS ($1,280.00). 2. The ?rivate Industry Council shall provide workers' compensation coverage and make applicable FICA and federal income tax withholding payments for all participants engaged in Work Experience under this Agreement. 3 ~ I . t . ~ t ~ . i "'I - V. TIME AND ATTENDANCE RECORD KEEPING 1. The Worksite Employer will keep accurate time and attendance records for each participant, employing the SYETP Time and Attendance Record provided by the Private Industry Council. The Worksite Employer shall have the respective supervisor and participant sign such Record daily. At the end of each two-week pay period, the Worksite Employer shall have the supervisor and participant sign and attest to the accuracy of such Record and shall promptly submit it to the Private Industry Council, maintaining a copy of each Record submitted. 2. The Worksite Employer certifies that (1) it will only record actual hours worked by participants; (2) it will require each participant to sign in and out, employing the SYETP Time and Attendance Record; (3) it will not permit participants to simultaneously sign in and sign out. 3. No SYETP Time and Attendance Records shall be submitted by the Worksite Employer to the Private Industry Council for any individual who has not been referred and certified as eligible for participation hereunder by the Private Industry council and selected by the Worksite Employer in accordance with Part III, and the Worksite Employer shall bear full responsibility for payment for any hours worked by any such individual. VI. EVALUATIONS AND MONITORING The Worksite Employer will fully cooperate in the evaluation and monitoring of activities under this Agreement by the Private Industry Council, the state of Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security, the u.s. Department of Labor, and any other unit of local, state, or federal government. VII. ASSURANCES AND CERTIFICATIONS The Worksite Employer will comply with the attached Assurances and Certifications, which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, and will retain a copy of this Agreement at each worksite. Each supervisor shall read and acknowledge understanding of the terms of this Agreement in the space provided. 4 ~ , , . . , ~ '-'4 Please print or type names of signatories in addition to signature. WORKSITE EMPLOYER PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL Authorized Signature Authorized Signature Title Title Date Date I certify that I have read this Agreement and understand its terms. WORKSITE SUPERVISORS DATE ~ 5 ( , I ~ . ¡ , , ~ ~ , ! , I, " WORK EXPERIENCE ASSURANCES AND CERTIPICATIONS The Worksite Employer assures and certifies that it will comply with the provisions of the Job Training Partnership Act (P.L. 97- 300) (the " Act" ) and regulations and policies promulgated thereunder, as such Act, regulations, and policies may be amended from time to time, and with applicable laws with respect to political activities, private-for-profit employment activities, nepotism, conflict of interest, fund raising, political patronage, and lobbying activities. The Worksite Employer further assures and certifies as follows: 1- Employment and training provided to participants hereunder will conform to the job description and the duties to be performed as set forth in the Outline of Skills to be Acquired. 2. Conditions of employment and training hereunder will be appropriate and reasonable with respect to the type of work, the geographical region, and the proficiency of the participant. 3 . Health and safety standards established under state and federal law, otherwise applicable to working conditions of employees, shall be equally applicable to working conditions of participants. 4. Except as may otherwise be provided in this Agreement, all participants shall be provided benefits and working conditions at the same level and to the same extent as other employees working a similar length of time and doing the same type of work. 5. Participants' activities under this Agreement will be conducted in compliance with the child labor provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act and other applicable laws. 6. Employment under this Agreement will not result in the displacement of employed workers or impair existing contracts for services or result in the substitution of federal funds for other funds in connection with work that would otherwise be performed. 7. No participant will be employed or jOb opening filled when any other individual is on layoff from the same or any substantially equivalent job, or when the Worksite Employer has terminated the employment of any regular employee or otherwise reduced its workforce with the intention of filling the vacancy so created by hiring a participant under this Agreement. 6 ~ I ~ . ; '! ~ " 8. No position under this Agreement will infringe in any way upon the promotional opportunities of currently employed individuals. 9. None of the funds disbursed under this Agreement will be used to assist, promote, or deter union organizing. 10. No individual shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, subjected to discrimination under, or denied employment in connection with this Agreement because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or political affiliation or belief. 1l. The Worksite Employer will afford participants an opportunity to present any grievances or complaints about its activities under this Agreement, in accordance with the Act. 12. Participants shall not be employed in the construction, operation, or maintenance of so much of any facility as is used or to be used for sectarian instruction or as a place for religious worship. l3. Worksite Employers that employ participants in Out-Of-Doors type work must provide the Private Industry Council with an inclement weather plan in writing and include this provision as part of this agreement. The inclement weather plan is to be attached to outline of skills to be acquired section (page 8) of this agreement. 14. The Worksite Employer will submit such information as may be required by the Private Industry Council and the Florida Department of Employment and Training in assessing the extent to which the services provided under this Agreement meet the special needs of disadvantaged, chronically unem- ployed, and low income persons for meaningful employment opportunities. 15. The Worksite Employer will provide the u.s. Department of Labor and the Comptroller General of the United states, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to this Agreement for a period of three years from the date of termination of this Agreement. 7 . I , . ~ . í I , ~ . ¡ 1·.1 ,- , , WORK EXPERIENCE OUTLINE OF SKILLS TO BE ACQUIRED (USE ADDITIONAL PAGES IF REQUIRED) For each occupation in which employment is provided under this Agreement, describe the following: wcc NO. 1. OCCUPATION: DOT NO. JOB TITLE: JOB DUTIES: SKILLS TO BE ACQUIRED: WCC NO, 2. OCCUPATION: DOT NO. JOB TITLE: JOB DUTIES: SKILLS TO BE ACQUIRED: WCC NO. 3. OCCUPATION: DOT NO. JOB TITLE: JOB DUTIES: SKILLS TO BE ACQUIRED: - skills to be aoquired inolude the following job holding oompetencies: attendance, punctuality, dependability, work attitude, initiative, (others your company emphasizes). 8 . . I ~ . , : , ì ~ . . ( .'. WORK EXPERIENCB OUTLINE OF SKILLS TO BB ACQUIRED CUSE ADDITIONAL PAGES IF REQUIRED) For each occupation in which employment is provided under this Agreement, describe the following: 4. OCCUPATION: DOT NO. JOB TITLE: JOB DUTIES: SKILLS TO BE ACQUIRED: 5. OCCUPATION: DOT NO. JOB TITLE: JOB DUTIES: SKILLS TO BE ACQUIRED: 6. OCCUPATION: DOT NO. JOB TITLE: JOB DUTIES: SKILLS TO BE ACQUIRED: Skills to be acquired include the tollowinq job holdinq competencies: attendance, punctuality, dependability, work attitude, initiative, (others your company emphasizes). SA ~ I I . . . , , ~ , '" WORK EXPERIENCE DESCRIPTION OF WORKSITES (USE ADDITIONAL PAGES IP REQUIRED) For each worksite, provide the following information: WORKSITE LOCATION: SUPERVISOR: TITLE: PHONE: OCCUPATION(S): NO. OF PARTICIPANTS: TOTAL PARTICIPANTS: WORKSITE LOCATION: SUPERVISOR: TITLE: PHONE: OCCUPATION(S) : NO. OF PARTICIPANTS: . TOTAL PARTICIPANTS: WORKSITE LOCATION: SUPERVISOR: TITLE: PHONE: OCCUPATION(S): NO. OF PARTICIPANTS: TOTAL PARTICIPANTS: WORKSITE LOCATION: SUPERVISOR: TITLE: PHONE: OCCUPATION(S): NO. OF PARTICIPANTS: TOTAL PARTICIPANTS: 9 . f ~ . , ~ , , , ,." WORK EXPERIENCE DESCRIPTION OF WORKSITES (USE ADDITIONAL PAGES IF REQUIRED) For each worksite, provide the following information: WORKSITE LOCATION: SUPERVISOR: TITLE: PHONE: OCCUPATION(S): NO. OF PARTICIPANTS: TOTAL PARTICIPANTS: WORKSITE LOCATION: SUPERVISOR: TITLE: PHONE: OCCUPATION(S): NO. OF PARTICIPANTS: " TOTAL PARTICIPANTS: WORKSITE LOCATION: SUPERVISOR: TITLE: PHONE: OCCUPATION(S): NO. OF PARTICIPANTS: TOTAL PARTICIPANTS: WORKSITE LOCATION: SUPERVISOR: TITLE: PHONE: OCCUPATION(S): NO. OF PARTICIPANTS: TOTAL PARTICIPANTS: wkexpagr.90 9A . , I t . , "! ,,, CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: ROBERT A. BARCINSKI, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER FROM: STAN WEEDON, ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR ~' ,- SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1990 REJECTION OF HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES PROPOSALS AND AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK NEW PROPOSALS ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of rejecting two existing proposals for the historic preservation design guidelines manual and authorizing staff to seek new proposals via a revised request for proposals ( RFP) , The City Commission is the acting body since proceeding in the requested matter is a policy determination. BACKGROUND: The City Commission on December 13, 1988 approved the transmittal of an application for a Certified Local Government (CLG) Grant for the development of a historic design guidelines manual for the City of Delray Beach. The CLG Grant Award was accepted by the City Commission on September 26, 1989. The approved price for the proposed project was $9,500 ($4,000 grant and $5,500 City share), The Historic Preservation Board sought proposals and heard presentations of the two respondents at a December 4, 1989 special meeting. The Board chose the firm of Van Horn Gray Associates as their first choice to negotiate a contract for the advertised services. The second respondent, and only one remaining, Mylan Valk Partnership was ranked second. The Chair of the Historic Preservation Board along with support staff to the HPB (Stan Weedon, Assistant Planning Director and Pa t Cayce, Historic Preservation Planner) worked through three drafts contracts based upon the initial RFP. However, during negotiations the scope of work changed significantly and the Board desires to readvertise and solicit new proposals under a revised RFP. The initial proposal for the required work product by the chosen consultant was $14,600. This cost was modified to $12,700 during development of the second draft contract and again revised to $26,500 during development of the third and current contract proposal. The price fluctuations were the result of modifications to the desired end work product by the Board. Based upon the revised RFP and a desire to bring the cost of the work product closer to the approved expenditure of $9,500, the Board has determined that a portion of the work may need to be performed in-house and that new proposals based upon the revised RFP be solicited. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Reject the two existing proposals for the historic preservation design guidelines manual and authorize staff to seek new proposals via a revised request for proposals (RFP). .:I<- SW\Design Guidelines\Reject.Txt CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL ria. 407 278 4 .5 Apr 19.90 14:27 F .IL: , , " .:'~~I.: ':. ' '~':f,:,~:i; ,~~,:,.':' , 1'- ".. ... ", ".' 4,..' '~ . '. I ') £ITY DF DELARY IER£H " .., I.',..: , , t ! CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 310 S,E. 1st STRŒT, SUItt: 4 D[:;LRA Y BEACJ.I, JiLORIOA 33483 407/243·7090 TELECOPIFN, 407/278-4755 MEMORANDUM Date: April 12, 1990 To: City conunission Robert A. Barcinski, Acting City Manager From: Susan A. Ruby, Assistant City Attorney Subj ect:_ Settlement of Nuisance Abatement Liens, Lot 4, Block 23J Town of Delray Eleanor Wilson Estate - The Eleanor wilson Estate has a buyer for the aforementioned 50 foot lot which is proposed to be used for parking for a church which is adjacent to the lot. The Estate property has unpaid City taxes which will be paid in full. The property also has numerous nuisance abatement liens and a water lien assessed against it. The law ~rm of Perry and Shone have requested a settlement of the fourteen nuisance abatement liens and a water lien on the above-described property. The settlement proposed is that all lien. be paid in full except for interest. The total ot all liens without interest is $2,504.72. The interest on the nuisance abatement liens, which is being requested to be waived, is $419.28. Please place this matter on the April 24, 1990 City commission agenda tor City commission action. ~ cc Larry Shone, Esq. Sue Morrison, Assistant to City Clerk ~ , , f f . ~ . t ~ It ~ , .. , I '" '" CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL No, 407 273 47'''~ Apr 19.90 14:27 c> I-I ~ I . _-_ . [ITY DF DELAA' BEA[H 100 N.W, lu AVENuE Ot:L.I'IA Y BEACH, I=L.OFlIDA 33444 .J07/243-1QOO April 11, 1990 perry' Schone, P.A. Attorneys at Law ~O S.E. Fourth Avenue Delray aeach, FL 33483 Attn: Bonnie Pastl Dear Bonni~: With regard to the Eleanor s. Wilson EStAte, I understand you wish a written statement trom the City as to the amount outstand- ing from municipal liens on this property. ... - Please be advised that 13 recorded Nuisance Abatements total $2225.55, one water lien for $166.95 ~nd one Nuisance Abatement,which has not been recorded as yet,£or $112~20. This is a total of $2504.72. The intere~«mount,which has not been figured in these calculations, cornea to $419.28. If you have any further questions reqardinq this statement, please f..l free to contact me. Sincerely, a~ ¡1<..~ / Sue Morriaon A..t. to City Clerk , /' I , THE EFFORT ALWAY~ MATTt::AS . , . , . ì , ; ~ ~ , ! ! ... [ITY DF DELRAY BEAEH 100 N,W, 1st AVENUE DElRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 407/243,7000 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ~OBERT A, BARCINSKI, INTERIM CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: OLD SCHOOL SQUARE BOARD NOMINATIONS RATIFICATION DATE: APRIL 18, 1990 Per the Management Agreement between Old School Square and the City which was approved by City Commission on March 14, 1990, City Commission is required to ratify the list of individuals voted on to serve on the Old School Square Board of Directors, On April 11th the membership of Old School Square nominated and approved the attached list of individuals to serve on the Board, City Commission is requested to ratify these appointments, RAB: kwg T, ,,... r:: _ ~ _ ...... ~ ^"" ^ "" I,.... "" ,.. ~~.,....--.,... . I I . ~ . ~ , :Ll , ~ .! ,~ -- F' . ø 1 APR-17-90 WED 'ê 26 ~RECEIVt. ÞPR 1 7 90 COMM, SVCS, GROUP M E M 0 it A M DUM TO: BOB BARCINSK!, ACTING CITY MANAGER FROM: MARYLOU STROLLO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OlD RE: BOARD OF DIRECTORS RATIFICATION SCHOOl DATE: APRIL 16, 1990 _. .-- _.... ----,.--.--. · SOUAßE · THE FOLLOWING BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND TERMS OF OFFICE, PER ANNUAL MEETING OF APRIL 11, 1990 TERM EXPIRING 1993 ALAN ARMOUR FRANCES BOURQUE BOB CHAPIN JOE GILLEY DEBBI! LITT~E REV. ALLEN ORR TERM EXPIRING 1992 NANCY EARNHART LARRY PARKER SANDY SIMON FRANK WHEAT TERM EXPIRING 1991 RON BACKER SKIP HARTZELL DUDLEY REMUS RABBI SAM SILVER PLEASE PLACE THIS ON THE NEXT AGENDA AND NOTICE US. Old School = Inc. Poet 0Iœ 181 51 NoI1h s.bIn 1MnUI ~Beed\F1orIda3344'1 407) 243-7922 '1"-.---" '..~.~- . . . , '~ . f . t " ! l ... ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RË~. N'R 1 0 90 M E M 0 RAN 0 U M COMM SVCS GROUp TO: ROBERT A. BARCINSKI INTERIM CITY MANAGER FROM: þ~~GATES D. CASTLE, P.E. CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: VARIANCE REQUEST - 140 HARBOR CIRCLE DATE: APRIL 10, 1990 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The city Commission had previously approved a variance to construct the dock at 140 Harbor Circle. Another variance, to delete the required sewage pump out, has been requested by the owner, Steve Smilack. Since it would be a hardship to construct a sewage pumpout in this case, Engineering recommends approval of the variance request. An Agenda Request form is attached for further processing. GDC:slg . . I . . r ! í , c::¿ß ~ i . I I ~ ;" ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT . -- M E M 0 RAN DUM / t;>~c~ ./ /;'l¡ ~/V~ I~ ~ () TO: ROBERT A. BARCINSKI \ -0-t" [' ~ ~\ 90 INTERIM CITY MANAGER vC,s' G--90 FROM: GATES D. CASTLE, P.E. u/:J >1 ~. ~. )-....1 ~..., .- CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: CITY HALL EXPANSION DATE: APRIL 19, 1990 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Attached is a copy of a letter from Sessoms-Grice outlining the work to be included in Change Order #20 for the subject project. The Change Order, in the amount of $178,000 will cover the modifications to the lobby, Commission Chambers and the 1st floor south wing. At their March 13th Meeting, City Commission had approved funding for the work in the estimated amount of $174,298. The Engineering Department recommends approval of Change Order #20 for the City Hall Expansion project in the amount of $178,000 and a time extension of 120 days. GDC:slg Attachments . . I ! '~ . r í Q'I t ~ , . 1 ,'. J'IT BY: 5ESSOI1S-I3R ¡ CE CONST, ; 4- ·90 4 : 3SPI1 ; , ~1~ 2783487;~ 1 ~ . Sessoms - Grice Construction Company, Inc. Apri 1 18) 199Q via FAX/mail Mr. John Robbins Digby Bridges, Marsh & Associates. Inc. c/o Delray Beaçh City Hall 100 NW 1 Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 Re: 1332 - CITY HALL EXPANSION Dear John: Per the drawings prepared by Digby Bridges, Marsh & Associates dated 03-26-90 consisting of pages SW-1, SW-2 and SW-3, we propose to demolish and rebuild the existing south wing where the building department is presently located and the entrance into the Commission chambers. This work will consist of but is not limited to, the following: 1) demolition and trash removal 2) drywall partitions as shown w/ sound insulation 3) reworking fire sprinkler system 4) electrical as shown - reusing existing light fixtures 5) new hvac ductwork, dampers and grilles. Compressors and air handlers are existing. 6) new acoustical ceiling 7) new carpeting 8) wallpaper on walls 9) doors and hardware 10) painting 11) casework and interior glass as shown 12} teak benchés 13) Fabrå Track acoustical wall treatment, fabric covered on south and southeast walls of Commission chambers 14) an ~Tlowance of $6,60U for the 39 comm;ss1on seats Not included: l} permi t fees 2) phone. computer. f1re alarm or security systems - we will only run conduits shown The same subcontractors and quality of materials used in the original . 7777 North Dayl~ Road Extension . Hol1ywood, Florida 33024 Phonu: Fort l.4udmiale (305) 431·7900 . MIami 945.1547 . . . I -. . f í j . ~ ! I i ... .3S0MS-GR ¡ CE COt'IST, ; 8-90 4:36PM; 32H 278~87\'~- ~- - -- . ~ ' ~.. Digby Bridges, Marsh & Associates. Inc. Apri 1 18, 1990 Page 2 additions ðnd renovations will be used this time. The cost of this work, per our previous meeting, is $178,000.00. The time needed to complete this work is four (4) months. Very truly yours. INC. Harvei; Senio HG/mb . . . , . , . r ,. ; ~ i . .. i .., . FINAL RELEASE OF LIEN STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH W, Allen Poston being first dully sworn deposes and says as follows: . -- 1. That he is Vice President of the Title Hardrives of Del ray, Inc, , a Florida Name of Corporation Corporation which is named in the Public Construction Bond dated the 29th day of September , 19 88 , between said corporation as the CONTRACTOR and the CITY OF Delray Beach , FLORIDA: as the OWNER, for the Construction of Storm Drainage System Number 3 said the Affiant is duly authorized to make this Affidavit as, or on behalf of said Contractor as hereinabove indicated and does hereby give statement under oath in compliance with and pursuant to Section 84.04 Florida Statutes 1953. 2. That the work called for the above and foregoing Contract has been completed and that all creditors contracting directly with or directly employed contractors, materialmen and suppliers, and all other credotirs performing or furnishing any work, labor or materials upon said Contract work, and that there are no unpaid creditors in connection therewith. Hardrives of Delray, lnc, J. Aff ian t ~ By ~ Sworn and subscribed W, Allen Poston, Vice President before me this 4th day of April ,19 90 . 'L~ 7J 12¿z~¡¿,Á Notary Public County of Palm Beach State of Florida - My Commission expires 9-22-91 (SEAL) ": END OF SECTION FRL-l ,. .' " ( . , . , . f I ~ , 30 I ~ . I ¡ ,I,. , She ,. 1 01 5 PERIOUICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMl:rH l r YPE OF PROJECT Paving & Drainage LOCATION De1rav Beach. Florida PROJECT NO. 87-1023 HAME OF CONTRACTOR Hardrives of DAlray Tl1ðl.?DRESS nA1 "!'Iy RA!'Il'"h Flnrið!'l CONTRACT NO. PERIODICAL ESTIMATE NO. 8 FoR PERIOD 12-31 1989 TO 1-30 19 90 Flnal -' OAIOIN"L !!5TIM"T!! COMPLETED TO O"TE vAlur 0' , tq:u UHIf or CO" PI" NO. or UHcOMrlr,IO COU. NO. Df!C""TtOH or I'f'" QUAN'" Y M,A!· U.." V4lUI UH" . Y4lur .o,,~ Itll'ro uu ". '21 UJ If' ", '81 '" '81 '" ftG' A-I F & I 18" Diameter Rein, 127 L,F, 60,00 7620.0C 99 5,940,00 ~onerete Pipe, , ~'-6' Deep A-2 F & I 18" diameter Rein 217 L.F, 64,00 13888.0C 202 12,928.00 Cone, Pipe ,6' -8' Deep A-3 F & I 24" Diameter Rein 30 L,F, 42.00 1260,OC 32 1,344,00 Cone. Pipe ,6'-8' Deep A-4 F & I 30" Diameter Rein 41 .L,F. 57.00 2337.00 32 1,824,00 Cone. Pipe,10'-12' Deep A-5 F & I 36" Diameter Rein 16 L,F, 59,00 944.00 11 649.00 Cone. Pipe,6'-8' Deep A-6 F & I 42" Diameter Rein 204 L.F. 71,00 14,484.00 184 13,064,00 Cone. Pipe,6'-8' Deep A-7 ~ & I 42" Diameter' Rein, 122 L,F, 120.00 14,640.00 124 14,880,00 Cone, Pipe,10'-12' Deep A-8 F & I 48" Diameter Rein. 50 L.F. 132.00 6,600,00 50 6,600,00 Cone, Pipe,6'-8' Deep (A-9 F & I 48" Diameter Rein. 1177 L,F. 77,00 13,629.00 163 12,551,00 Cone, Pipe,8'-10' Deep /A-I F & I 54" Diameter Rein, Cone, Pipe,8'-10' Deep ~13 L.F. 139.00 57,407.00 278 38,642.00 ~-1 F & I 60" Diameter Rein, 43 L.F. 155.00 22,165,00 , Cone, Pipe,8i-l0' Deep ; . I 1\-1 F & I 34"x53" Oval Rein. [357 L.F. 81. 00 28,917,00 357 28,917,bo Cone, Pipe,6'-8' Deep I : ~-1 F & I 34"x53" Oval Rein. 53 L.F. 13 7 . 00 20,961. 00 142 19,454.þO Cone. Pipe,8'-10' Deep 51,925,ÞO ¡ F\-1 F & I 38"x60" Oval Rein, 74 L,F. 155.00 42,470.00 335 Cone, Pipe,10'-12' Deep I \-1 F & I 43"x68". Oval Rein, 54 L,F, 160.00 8,640.00 48 7,680,pO Cone. Pipe,8'-10' Deep I I ~-lE Þ & I 48"x76" Oval Rein, ~76 L.F, 188.00 89,488,00 649 122,012,'00 I Cone, Pipe,6'-8' Deep '\-1 F & I 48"x76" Oval Rein. 29 L,F. 192,00 101,568.00 471 90,432,00 Cone, Pipe,8'-10' Deep ¡ I ~-ll F & I Type "P" Manh,:,le 1 12E15.0C 1 1,285, 00 ~ E, 1,285.00 ì 4' Diameter,6'-8' Deep ~-lc F Ii I TYflA "P" Manhole 1 E. 1530.0C 1,530.00 "'," Diameter, 10'-12' Deep ! ~-2( F & I Type "J" Manhole 3 E. 1900.0C 5,700.00 2 3,800 00 6' Diameter, 6'-8' Deep TOTAL 433,927. pO CONTINUED A . ..... -....- ,.,. I ... Sh·-, No. 2 01 5 ~ PERlvJICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PA'(.. _NT . ., ¡: TYPE OF PROJECT PAVING & DRAINAGE LOCA TlON DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NO. 87-1023 , tlAME OF CONTRACTOR HARDRIVES OF DELRAY ADDRESS DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA CONTRACT NO. ¡ , PERIODICAL ESTIMATE NO.-L FOR PERIOD 12-31 19~~ . TO 1-30- 19 90 , Final O",IOINAL EST'MATE COMPLETED TO DATE VAl,Ur or , 'ffY UN" 0' C (1St PE~ NO. (I' UNCou'll'.D C (lu· NO. Dt'CIlt'~TlON ðr ITIfM OUA"'.T Y MfA'- UM" VALUE UNITt VAL UI WO". ..tITID ; uor "I 121 131 UI I" tel 1'1 '" I" ItGI I , í F & I Type "J" Manhole 2075,0 4,150.00 2 4,150,00 , A-2 2 E. ¡ 6' Diameter, 8'-lO'Deep J ~-2 F & I Type "J" Manhole 2 E. 2505,01 5,010.00 2 5,010,00 ~ 6' Diameter, 10'-12'Dee~ i A-2 F & I Type "J" Manhole 2 E. 2310.0( 4620,00 2 4,620,00 , I 7 ' Diameter, 8'-10' Dee~ 1\-2 F & I Type "J" Manhole 2 E, 2690,OC 5,380.00 1 2,690,00 7' Diameter, 10'-12'Dee~ ~-2 F & I Type "J" Manhole 4 E, 3170.0C 12,680.00 3 9,510,00 8' Diameter, 8'-10'Deep A-2E F & I Type "J" Manhole 1 E. 3865.0C 3,865,00 1 3,865,00 I 8' Diameter, 12'-14'Deep 1 '\-2 F & I Type "J" Bottom 2 E. 3765,OC 7,530,00 2 7,530,00 8' Diameter W/Type"F" Inlet, 8'-10' Deep , : -21 F & I Type "J" Box 1 E. 2580.0C 2,580.00 1 2,580,00 Manhole 6'Lx5'W. 6'-8' I Deep i -2c 2940.0C I F & I Type "J" Box 1 E, 2,940,00 1 2, 940,,00 Manhole 6'Lx5'W, 8'-10' ! Deep ! -3C F & I Type "J" Box 1 E. 3660.00 3,660,00 Manhole 7'Lx6'W,W/Type ! "F" Inlet 6'-8' Deep 4.035JOO -31 !õ' & I Type "J" Box 7'Lx6 1 E. 4035.00 4,035,00 1 fI, W/Type "F" Inlet 8'- I 0' Deep I , -32 Iõ' & I Type"J" Box &'Lx6' 1 ~, 4215.00 4,215,00 1 4,215 00 /lIType "F" In1et10'-12' Jeep 1-33 F & I Type"J" Box 8'Lx4' 2 ~, 3095.00 6,190.00 2 6,190 00 W, w/Type"F" Inlet 8'-10 þeep ¡ . -34 ~ & I type"J" Box 8'Lx6' 1 E, '1200.00 4,200.00 1 4,200100 W, w/Type "F" In1et10'- .. I 2' Deep t , ~ ' -35 b & I type"J" Box 8'Lx7' 1 ~. ~675,OO 4,675.00 i ¡,¡,w/Type "F" Inlet 6'-8' ; Þeep I ,'1-36 F & I Typ~ ,,~" ~n~8'~x7' 1 E. 5225. or 5,?25.no 1 5,225 00 W, w/Type "F" In1n~ 8'- 10' Deep ! TOTAL CONTINUED bo 500,687. f ~ I , ....--.... ..,. ",.¡ ---- -_.-- 5' 'fo, 3 0' " PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMt:NT TYPE OF PROJECT Paving , Drainage LOCA TlON Delrav beach florida PROJECT NO,87-10?1 IIAME OF CONTRACTOR Hardrives of De1ray ADDRESSDAlr~y Rp~~h P1nr;t't::a CONTRACT NO, PERIODICAL ESTIMATE NO,----ª-- FOR PERIOD 12-31 19 89. TO 1-30 1990 Final ,:1 ORIGINAL ESTIMATE COMPLETEO '0 OATE VAl VI: 0' , U,.tr or COS' Pt~ NO, or UNCOOAOlUID eo...· NO, OI:'C"'~"OM or I"'" QUANTIT T MUS- UN'T YAlUI UN,n YAlUI .0.._ "llr,o UN! 'II II' U, UI ISI It, 111 It, '" It01 A-3 I.F , I Type "J" Box 8'Lx 1 E, 575.00 5,575,OD 1 5,575,0 7' W, w/Type "F" Inlet 10'-12' Deep A-3 F , I Type "F" Inlet 3 E. 590,00 4,770,0 2 3, 180, 0 D 4'-6' Deep A-3 F , I Type "F" INlet 3 E, 1750.0 5,250,0 2 3,500,0 6'-8' Deep ~-4 F , I Specialty Box No. 1 E, 7500.0( 7,500.0 1 7,500,0 1 þ\-4 F , I Specialty Box No. 2 E, 4500.0( 9,000,0 2 9,000,0 2 ¡ ~-4 F , I Specialty Box No, 1 E. 8000,O( 8,000.0 1 8,000,0 3 ~-4 r , I Specialty Box No. 2 E. 4500, O~ 9,000.0 2 9,000.0 4 ~-4 F , I Specialty Box No. 1 E, 5500,O( 5,500.0 1 5,500~0 5 ~-4 Remove Existing Manhole 5 E. 250.0( 1,250.0 7 1 , 7501. 0 ! ~-4¡ Remove existing inlet :8 E. 250.0( 2,000.0 9 2,250,0 · I J 1\-4 Remove 12" CMP 5 L.F. 20.0C 100.0 35 70Q,O · ì , r 1\-4E Remove 15" CMP 18 L,F, 20.00 360,O( 30 6°1.0 I · t I \-4c Remove 18" CMP 16 L.F, 20.00 320.0( 1\-5C Remove 24" CMP 24 L.F. 20,00 480.0( I 58J.0 -51 ~emove 15" RCP 47 L.F. 20,00 940.0( 29 \ -52 F , I Block , Mortar Plu 6 E. 100.0Ò 600.0C 10 1 , oooi, O( for 12" CMP I -53 F , I Block ',Mortar Plu 2 E. 125,00 250.0C 1 125 ,O( For 15" CMP -54 I:' , I Block & Mortar Plu, 2 E, 150.00 300 , O( 1 15C .O( ! I:'or 18" CMP , i -55 r , I Block & Mortar Plu 4 ~. 125,00 500.0C 50( .O( ¡ 4 I For 15" RCP ¡ -56 F , I Block & Mortar Plu, 12 E. 150.00 1,aOO.Oc 7 1,05( ,01 ¡ For 18" RCP i J -57 Þ & I Block & Mortar Plue 2 8, 175.00 350,OC 1 17 .0 74" R<.:P J -58 F & I BI0,ck & Mortar Plu~ 2 8. 200.00 400.00 ! For 36" RCP I I TOTA" CONTINUED 560,822 00 I . .. ... -..... ..." '''. Sh....' ".,. 4 01 5 PERIOL.,~Al ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYML.. r TYPE OF PROJECT Pavi nq & Dra i n"'q~ LOCATION Delray Beach, Florida PROJECT NO. 87-1023 NAME OF CONTRACTOR Hardrives of Delrav Inc~ODRESS Delray Beach. Florid... CONTRACT NO. PERIODICAL ESTIMATE NO, 8 FOR PERIOD 12-31 1989 TO 1-30 19 90 -' Final ORIGINAL ESflMATE COMPI-ETED TO DATE , V'l UI or ,'II:.... UNIT or COST Pili NO, 0' UNco..PLIUD CO'" ""0. DltClltlllTlðN 0' 'T.'" QUANTITY MrA!' UNIT VAlUI UNITt VAlUE .0". "ll"O U"I .., lit UI let '51 ft' ", III It' Ito. .- t-ss F & I Block & Mortar Plu 2 E, 250.00 500,OC 2 500,00 For 42" RCP -6C F & I Jack & Bore Under 1 L.S. 40000.0 ) 40,000,OC 1 40,000,00 FL E, Coast Railway -61 ~ & I 36" Polyethylene 108 L.F, 105.00 11,340,OC 113 11,865,00 Pipe -62 .. & I Twin 48" Conn, 1 L,S 0000,0 ) 10,000.00 1 10,000,00 Through Existing Bulk- Head -63 .. & I 16" Limerock Base 3,400 S.Y 12.00 40,800,00 3,125 37,500,00 Replacement -64 .. & I l~ Thick Type II 3,700 S.Y, 4,15 15,355,00 3,125 12,968,75 Asphalt St, Replacement -65 Þ & I 6" thick Stabilizec 400 S.Y, 18.00 7,200,00 Shoulder I -66 Þ & I 4" Thick Sidewalk 850 S.Y, 15,00 12,750.00 672 10,080,OO! Reconstruction -67 & I 6" Thick Sidewalk 60 S.Y. 18,00 1,080,00 108 1,944,00 , Reconstruction I I -68 & I Type "0" Curb 800 L.F, 7.00 5,600.00 204 1,428,00 -69 & I Type "F" Curb 100 L,F, 6.50 650.00 132 858,00' ! -70 & I Fire Hydrant 3 E. 750.00 2,250.00 1 750.00' Assembly I I -71 & I Solid Sod 400 S.Y. 2.50 1,000.00 486 1,215,00 -72 ddition Excavation For 10 C.Y. 5,50 55.00 Removal of Unstable Bedding Material I I -73 aterial For Pipe Bedding 5 C,Y. 15,00 75,00 I I Ordered in Writing By i Engineer I -74 iscellaneous Concrete 5 C.Y. 75.00 . 375,00 In Trench TOTAL BID AMOUNT BASE BI þ, 749,763.00 BID SCHEDULE A, ITEMS A-~ THROUGH A-74 INCLUSIVE. ! TOTAL 749,763.00 689,930.7 . ...- -.- ..... I i .., et No. S of S SCHEDULE OF CHANGE ORDERS . Chanae Order Additions Related Item on No, Date Form Description Amount Completed Deductions (1) (2) W· 1000 To Date (3 ) (4) (5) (6) (7) 1 22,592 45 22,592 4C /" 2 51,590 OC 51,590 OC ./ 3 4~700 OC 4,700 OC /' Tota 15 78.882 4c 7P. RR? i4c 2. ANALYSIS OF ADJUSTED CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE A, Original contract amount (Col. 6 front of this fona) 7,tè~~:~~ ~ B. Plus: Additions scheduled fn colu.n 5 above C. less: Deductions scheduled in colu.n 7 above -0- D. Adjusted contract amount to date 828.645,45/" 3. ANALYSIS OF WORK PERFORMED 1. Va1ue of origina1 contract work performed to date (C01.8 front) 689.930.75/ 2. Extra work performed to date (Col. 6 above .fnus Col. 7) 78.882,45 ./ 3. Tota1 value of work perfonled to date 768.813,20./ 4, Less: Amount retafned )dO percent -0- 5, Net amount earned on contract work to date ~-6..A.AJlÆ5 Î ~ X, t \ ?1 2 c' 6, Add: ~terials stored at close of this period (Attach detailed schedule -0- I 7. less: Amount of previous pa~nts 678. 750 . 48 c.../' 8, BALANCE DUE THIS PAYMENT 90,062,72 ./" 4. CERTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR I certffy that I have checked and veriffed this Periodfcal Esti..te No. 8-F i naJ for the period 12-31-89 to 1-30-90 , inclusive, and that it fs a true and correct statement of all work perfor- med, and/or any and all material and equfpnent supplfed by the contractor; that all work and all materfals and equfpment fnc1uded fn the Perfodfcal Estf..te No. 8-Fi na 1 has been performed and/or supplfed in full accord· ance wfth the terms and condftfons of the contract documents, and/or duly authorfzed deviations, substftutfons, alterations and/or addftions; that al1 terms of Periodfcal Estfmate No.8-Final have been authenticated and approved by the duly authorfzed undersfgned agent of the contractor. ~4 Hardrives of Delrav, Inc. By (;J. ~ ,t/ . L.-...... (Contractor) (Authorized Representative) Apri 1 5, 1990 19_ Title W. Allen Poston, Vice President 5. CERTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION BHOINEER Accordfng to the best of .y knowl.dge. I c.rtify that all ft..s and llaunts shown on the face of the perf odic pay.esti..t. are correct; that all work. ..terial and equt,.ent shown thereon has been don. and sup- pHed on the Project bet..en The City of Delrav Beach (own.r). and Hardrives of Delrav. Inc. (contractor), dated SeD. 29 , . 19~, including any duly authorized deyiations, substi- tutions. alteratfons and/or additfons; that ft fs agreed that thfs perfodical .stf..te fs a true and correct statement of the contract amount. up to and including the last day of the period covered by this periodical estf..te. and that no part of the Mbalanc. dueM thfs payment his been rec.fved. BARkER. OSHA I ANO£RSON. 11Ie. By N¡¿ , Tt tie Contracts Administrator Gary R. Cartwright, P.E. Date '1'4 CITY RTTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL ~~o, 407 273 i . S R p r 1 oj . ':~ CI 1 4 : 2:: ~. ,1:14 .< : £1" DF DELAA' CITY AnORNEY'S OFFICE 310 S,E. ht STREET. SUITE.. DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA 3348) 401/243·7090 TELECOPIER 407/278-17SS MEMORANDUM Date: April 16, 1990 To: Major William Coohrane Support Bureau Prom: Susan A. Ruby, Assistant ~ity Attorney SUbject: 1990/91 E"'91.1' Interlocal Agreement I have reviewed the a9reemen~s a~ to legal sufficiency and form and find them acceptable. As a,n inter local aqreement, these agreements, once executed by all parties should be filed with the Circu1 t Court. By copy of this memorandum to the Acting City Manaqer, I am forwardinq on your request to place this matter on the April 24, 1990 City commission Agenda for approval. J2¡¿ SAR:ci cc Robert A. Barclnsk1, Acting City Manager Alison MacGreqor, City Clerk , I I . t . i ; 31 ~ ~ . ¡ ,,'. CITY RTTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL ~,jiJ, 407 278 ., ,S Hpr 19 . '~iO 14: 2: F . ':1:- . I . '.. . I lar..LOCAL ACt.BN.NT .atwBIR THI BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS or PALM IBACR COUITY. FLORIDA A.I TUI \ CITY OP D&LR.Y ¡B.CR roa Tal IIIARCIKBRT ARD KAl.TINARCI or TII 1-9·1-1 IMlkCIBe! rBLIPIOHI HUKllk SYSTeM THIS A¡reement is mad. and entered into thi, day of - - . 1990. by and b.t~.en PAtM BRACH COUNTY. a political aubd1v1aion of the State of 'lorida, who.. addres8 18 301 North Olive Avenue. Welt Palm Beach, Plorida 3 340 I . hereinafter referted to .. the COUNTY Ind tbe CITY OF DELRAt BEACH, a Florida mlln1c1.pal corporation. whole address is 300 W. ATLANTIC AVENUE. ! D!LRAY BE AC R , FLORIDA 33444 herein referred to a. the : I Ii CITY/TOWN. , I II I WRBREAS, the COUNTY, pursuant to F. S. 365.171 (l 3) J hat : , Ii I been authorized by the State of Florida to upgrade and coordinate ¡' I 1/ the Emergency Telephone System (1911) throughout the COUNTY, and ;\ p WHEREAS, the partie. have previously entered into an I I I Interlocal Agreement dated JULY 1 2 , 1988 tor the initial ¡ upgrad1nl and matntenance of the CITY/TOWN's Emergency Telephone I I Byatell. and I war.¡IAS, pi.rttea i , no~ deetre to continue and clarify theit I I alreement , \ and. WHIRIAS, epter1ng into thil tnterlocal Agreement 18 in the . ¡ be.t inter..ta ot the clti.ene of Palm Beach County.. it will benefit the health, .afaty and welfare of 8aid citizenl. NOW THSaEFOllE. in consideration of the pr..1.ea and I heretn contained, 1. mutually agreed between ¡ p romta., It the parti.. .. toll ow.: 1 . The purpose of tht. Agreemenc and ita acc01l!panying ¡ I! appendix(.a) i. to eatabli.h not-to-exce.d funding level.; 'I i equ1pIDont acquisition co.ta; maintenance and recut ring COlt I! ' .- j r.aponat)111tte.; completlon date. of equipment in.tallationa and , , ' upgrades; reimburs.ment procedures; e.tab11ah Dlin1mUIIa performance ¡ \ atand.rda and related procedurea; and define provisions I 'I ¡ ;: pe~t.1n1n. to the E 9-1-1 !mer.ency Telephone Number Sy.te. .. it I ; , relatee to the parti.. heteto. The ite.. lilted herein .nd thi ì I ! , ; ,..~ TEL No, 407 278 - ':)5 Apr 19,90 14: 2'j F ,1:1r:, CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE . . re.pon.lb111t1e. all.igned are not all inclu.ive and it ia I I anticipated that the E 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Number Sy.tem in I I Palm Beach County will require future revi.1on. and ! J modifications. Accordingly, this document doe. not represent . ! limItation of E 9-1-1 . , need. or requirements and may be amended by Ii ;¡ lIutual agreement of the partiel. I! 2 . The provision. of this Agreement are 8ubject to II COUNTYÞ. fund availability. If COUNTY shall not h.ve funds i available to fulfill the fiscal require.ent. of the projects and ! procurements .et forth here1n, it shall have no obligation to fund. or co.plet. any of the projects or to procure equip.ent and. it, ma1.ntenance. a.currine coat. herein described ,hall not exceed the amo!unt a.a1lned to each item or project and the I COUNty shall not1be liable for and pay any additional co.t.. I 3. term - The teim of thi. Â¡reement shall be fro. October ¡ 1 t 1990 throulh September 31 t 1991, and ahall be auto.atically I ren..ed and extended for on. year terms unless either party ahall liv. written notice to the other of itl intention to terminate this Agree.ant a. of a date not le'8 than ninety (90) days l.bllqUln¡ to thl d a t el 0 f I' U c h not: 1. c e . The app.ftdix will be ¡ revised t l.aat 60 dayl prior to October 1. t . annually to I :1 reflect the anticipated maximum coets for recurrina and II II " ! non-recurring expense. to b. rai.bur.ed to the CITY/TOWN durins , , , I , I the t.rm of the appended agreellent. Upon approval of the , ;1 appendix by the CITY/TOWN, the COUNTY will pre.ant the revieed Ii II Ii cost. to the Board of County Commie.ioners for approval .nd il attac.hm.nt to the .gree.ent. I 'I 4. Notwithstanding any other provisions of thi, Alr.elunt, 'I :1 :1 the COUNTY"S m.x1mu. obltgation d u ring the annual t.ra. of the I' I i Alree..nt shall b, 1n agreem.nt with the attached appendix. It I ¡ 1. anticipated chat the parti.. will review the Alr....nt at ¡ I leaet annually to e.tab11ah chana·· 1n equip.ent .erviee. r.qui red, to add Of' delete ..rvlc., and to reflect chan... in I char,.. and the COUNTY's .ax1mu. obligetion hereundar. : 5. Upon 1natallation of any .quipm.nt or initiation of an7 ¡ I ¡ .,.. CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL r,jo, 407 27::: 4 7-~ HP r- 1 '~, ,~, 1:1 1 .:¡ : :-1:1 F" . \~I ~ . \) . . i , I I service 1n aocordance with this Agreel1lent the CITY/TOWN ahall I ! . I a.au.. all11ab11ity pertaininl to the procured items or projects I ! and the COUNTY shall be relieved from any liability, under I any theory ot law. whatsoever. Any claim or action ba.ed upon faulty I manufacture, c:on.tructlon, ot' performance shall be against the I manufacturer the contractor performing the work as tbe ca.e or .ay be. The CITY/TOWN shall a'lum. all risk of 10.. or damase to equip.ant and ,ball maintain 1n.urance or a self in.urance program coverinl the equipment in accordance with the normal practice. of the CITY/ TOWN. 6. The CITY/TOWN Ihall maintain. at minimum, the fol1ow1nl level of service to thole re.1d.~t. within ttl jurisdiction: A. Calls placed on the E 9-1-1 sYltem must be I an.wered on the average within the firtt I three ( 3) ring I , or within twelve ( 12) II seconds of the be.inning of the first rina· 'I II 9-1-1 ¡ B. Each telephone l1ne or position muet be recorded with the capability of in.tant " playback and .na101 recordins· , c. Alternate rautio. will be established to , another answering point with Autollatic: ,I " Number Identification and Automatic , I Ii Location Information capabilities. it ~. I I ¡¡ A Telecommunication. Device for ~he Deaf will b e m.int.ined and oper.ted j continuously. ( \ E. All equipment f.i1ure. will be reported 1 promptly to 9-1-1 Kan.,I.ent. I , . 7. The CJTY/TOWN .halll comply. at m1ni1lum, with all . t. n d a rd. :,' I tab J! i. h. d for publie .afety answering points by the Ðlv1110n of Communieatlon, of thl State of 'lorida. I 8. Payment in rei.bur....nt of cOlta incurred by the I I CITY/TOWN in accordance with the attached appendix will be made I I upon receipt ot involces, including copi,. of the applicable bill fro. the equipmlnt/.ervic. provider, delivered to the: 911 Manas,..nt OffiCI, 3111 s. D1x1e Highway. Suite 208, W.tt Pall11 I leach, Florida 33 40 , . Payment will normally be made by the \ :¡ COUNTY within forty~f1v. (4') day. of receipt of the invoicet and I .upport1n. .ateriale. , I I J \ ¡ t ! \ , ,~ CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL ~,jo, 407 273: 4' :; Apr 19,90 14:30 F' I-I::: . . ~ ¡ 9. Written notice under this Agree~ent ahall be delivered , i by certified tla11 or hand delivered to the parties at the :1 I following location.: ) I CITY/tOWN: CITY OF DIL&AY BEACH 100 NW FIRSt AV!NUE DILRAY BEACK, '~OaIDA 33444 COUNTY~ EMERGINCY MEDICAL SE1VICES 3111 S. DIXIS HIGHWAY, SUITE 208 ,WIST PALM BlACK. PLOiIDA 33405 , I I 10. . ~u..~lon. cone.ruin. the terms or operation of thie , INTERLOCALi AGREEM!NT b.t~e.n the COUNTY and tbe CITY/TOWN. or any other related lD.tter.~ thall be submitted to the COUNTY"'. 911 Mana.e.ent Office in wrlt1nl. Any unresolved dispute. shall be ultimately determined by the governins body of the COUNTY, whoee doci.ion ahall be final and conclusive unl.s. reconsidered and a.ended. IN WITNESS WHEREOf. the partiea hereto have let cheir hands and .eal the day and y.ar firlt above written. / I ) ATTEST: CITY/TOWN OF D&I.8.AY BEACH It: " City Clark DATI!:: . PALM BEACK COUNTY. FLO~IDA, BY ITS BOARD or COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Chair DATI: -A.. JOHN I. DUNKLE. Clerk A. authori..d for execution by the Board of County I Co..i..toner. e~ iesular .e.tin, on .. BY: Approved al to fora and le.e1 luffie1ency County Attorney I I , ,¡", CITY ATTDI?~.)EY':S DFFICE TEL No, 407.27:3 4--c) Hpr l~,,~'I:1 1~:31 FJi:' . , . " " 1 . A"IRDIX As approved by the Board of County Coma1s1oner. on the day'or , 1990. the following non-recufr1.n& expenle. .ball be procured and 1natalled by the CITY OF DELRAY .SACH an4 the coat thareof ahall ba .atabur.e4 by the CODNTY, I I MAXIMUM COST I SQUIPKINT OR SERVICE TO COUNTY C e 11 u 1 arT ele ph 0 n. s (2) $ 1 , 400 . 00 I The follow1n. recurring expenses wIll be procured by the CITY OF DELRAY BEACH and the COlt thereof shall be reimbursed by the COUNTY: MAXIMUK ANNUAL COST EQUIPMENT 0& SIRVICS TO COUNTY Maintena'ñce'l' or Lo,¡B1n, I.ecorder $3,467.00 ¡ Maintenance of I~.tant Playback ~.corder $972.00 H..4aHa <Æa1nt.J....) I , $450.00 T.D.D. Maintenance $200.00 , Cellular Telephone Accala lee $720.00 I . I I II I II ' ' . I II ¡ ,I I I: I ! ' ¡: I' I' I ' II : I; / Ii ' ¡¡ I II ¡I I II I I! ! II ' II I MEMORANDUM TO: Robert A. Barcinski Interim City Manager FROM: Joe Weldon Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Cystic Fibrosis DATE: April 16, 1990 Attached is a letter from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation requesting the use of our small stage, eight (8) tables and twenty (20) folding chairs for their fund raiser on May 19, 1990. We have assisted in their efforts in the past. Cystic Fibrosis is requesting that the rental fee be waived, which can be done with City Commission approval. If you concur with this request, please place this on the April 24th agenda for City Commission consideration. Parks and Recreation JW: jmh REF:JW089 . ' . . . r ~ 301- , .. I r ~ Cystic Fibrosis Foundation April 4, 1990 Mayor Tom Lynch city of Delray Beach 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 Dear Mayor Lynch: On behalf of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, I would like to thank the City of Delray Beach for its tremendous support of the second annual Great Strides Nationwide 10-K walk, to be held 9:00 A.M. on Saturday, May 19, 1990. As the walk date nears, I find that I once again need: the City's assistance to ensure a successful event. As we did last year, we are again asking to utilize the following: - The two piece stage that is often used for Civic events - Eight folding tables and twenty folding chairs I understand that there may be a cost incurred to cover the payroll for City personnel involved in the transportation, assembling and disassembling process of the stage. But I do hope that the City will make these items available, waiving any applicable rental fees. In closing, I thank the City of Delray for it's cooperation and support. I look forward to your approval of these final issues, and to the success of our event in the community of Delray Beach. Sincer,ely, ß ~ÇíP U7'µ Jeannie P. Gustafsön Event Co-Chairperson cc/Carol Olsen Special Events Director Ft. llIuderdale Regional Office (305) 739-5006 Broward 3443 N.w. 55th Street. Building 7 (305) 947-4243 Dade Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309 (305) 426-3918 Boca Ra10n . I ~ . , ~ . " CITY OF DELRAY BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT STAGE RENTAL INFORMATION SHEET FEES Small Stage (16x20) one (1) day $250.00 per day two (2) days $200.00 per day three (3) days $175.00 per day four (4) days or more $150.00 per day Large Stage without Canopy (24x30) one (1) day $350.00 per day two (2) days $300.00 per day three (3) days $275.00 per day four (4) days or more $250.00 per day Large Stage with Canopy (24x30) one (1) day $350.00 per day plus labor two (2) days $300.00 per day plus labor three (3) days $275.00 per day plus labor four (4) days or more $250.00 per day plus labor ** Fees are based on delivery, set-up, take down and pick up. Non-profit or civic groups may apply to City Commission for a waiver. The Parks and Recreation Department prohibits the use of the stage(s) outside the City limits. PAYMENT A $100 deposit check, payable to the City of Delray Beach, should be remitted to the Parks and Recreation Department no later than 4 weeks prior to the event. The Department is located at 50 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33444. CANCELLATION You are eligible for a full refund if cancellation is made at least one week prior to the event. Cancellation of less than one weeks notice will result in the forfeiture of your $100.00 deposit. DAMAGES If damages occur to the stage(s) as a result of your negligence, the Parks and Recreation Department will either keep the $100.00 deposit or bill you for the total repair costs, which ever is greater. If you have any questions, please call the Parks and Recreation Department Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. at 243-7250. REF: STGEPOL . , f . ~ . : , " ~ f ¡ ( ." CITY OF DELRAY BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT STAGE RENTAL APPLICATION NAME OF AGENCY: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: DAY PHONE t: EVENING PHONE *: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF INTENDED USE: SIZE OF STAGE NEEDED: SMALL STAGE (16' X 20') LARGE STAGE WITHOUT CANOPY (24' X 30') LARGE STAGE WITH CANOPY (24' X 30') FEES: SMALL STAGE $ PER DAY X DAYS = $ LARGE STAGE (WITHOUT CANOPY) $ PER DAY X DAYS = $ LARGE STAGE (WITH CANOPY) $ PER DAY X DAYS = $ PLUS LABOR EXPENSES = $ TOTAL RENTAL FEE......................................... = $ LESS DEPOS IT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. = $ 100 . 00 BALANCE DUE.............................................. = $ DEPOSIT: DATE RECEIVED: MCR#: BALANCE DUE: DATE RECEIVED: MCR#: STAGE DELIVERY DATE: TIME: STAGE PICK UP DATE: TIME: WAIVER I/We agree to save, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of De1ray Beach, its agents and employees from any claim, demand, suit, loss, cost, expense or any damage which may be asserted, claimed or recovered against or from the City of De1ray Beach or its agents or employees, by reason of any damage to property or personal injury, including death, sustained by any person whosoever, and which damage, injury or death arises out of or is incidental to or in any way connected with the use or condition of the rented property, including without limitation the manufacture, selection, delivery, operation or return of the property, or any act or omission of the City of De1ray Beach, its agents, or employees; and regardless of whether such claim, demand, damage, loss or expense is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or acts by the City of Delray Beach or its agents or employees. Nothing in this agreement shall be deemed to affect the rights, priviledges, and immunities of cities and counties as are set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. Superintendent of Parks Director of Parks & Recreation Representative's Signature Date REF: STGEAPP .., '-~-- ." --- -- "---- _.- ._--- - ---- -- - ---- - - "------ - - ~-- ---- _. ---- -------- -- ------- - - - - RESOLUTION NO. 42-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, VACATING AND ABANDONING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PEARL STREET AND 1 6 ' ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN LOTS 1 THRU 4 OF BLOCK 68, TOWN OF LINTON AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 , PAGE 3, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach is the fee-simple owner of all of Block 68, Town of Linton, as recorded in Plat Book 1 , Page 3, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; and, WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach, Florida, has made application for abandonment of Pearl Street and 161 Alley located between Lots 1 thru 4 of Block 68, Town of Linton; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of the Ci ty of Delray Beach, Florida, finds that its interest in the described property is no longer needed for the public good and deems it to be in the best interests of the city of Delray Beach to vacate the right-of-way for Pearl Street and 16' Alley located between Lot 1 thru 4 of Block 68, Town of Linton, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Chapter 177, Section 177.101 ( 5 ) and Chapter 166 of the Florida Statutes, it is hereby determined to vacate and abandon all right and interest it holds to the following described real property: The right-of-way for Pearl Street and 16' Alley located between Lots 1 thru 4 of Block 68, Town of Linton as recorded in Plat Book 1 , Page 3 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the day of , 1990. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk 33 ""I - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~~ M E M 0 RAN DUM ~~, ~D CO"-,,, &1< '90/ TO: ROBERT A. BARCINSKI Cs . GI?O' . INTERIM CITY MANAGER IJ¡~ FROM: )) ~c. GATES D. CASTLE, P. E. / CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: OLD SCHOOL SQUARE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ALLEY ABANDONMENT DATE: APRIL 10, 1990 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Please find attached Resolution for Abandonment of subject. This abandonment is necessary in conjunction with the replatting of the property. GDC:slg Attachment ( , I . ~ . > . : , ~ ~ . , a'_ -- -. ----- - ---~--- ----- . -.--- .._--------_.__.._--_.~---------._-- -~ -+ ----------- -- -.--- --- -- - ,- ~-- ~ RESOLUTION NO, 43-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 165, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS FOR ABATEMENT ACTION REGARDING AN UNSAFE BUILDING ON LAND(S) LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH; SETTING OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABATEMENT AND LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH. ACTION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND INTEREST ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE RECORDING OF THIS RESOLU- TION, AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO BE A LIEN UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR UNPAID ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE MAILING OF NOTICE. WHEREAS, the Building Official or his designated representative has, pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances, declared the existence of an unsafe building upon certain lots or parcels of land, described in the list attached hereto and made a part hereof, for violation of the building codes and building requirements adopted by Chapter 165 and those Codes adopted in Chapter 96 of the Code of Ord- inances; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, the Building Official or his designated representative has inspected said land(s) and has determined that an unsafe building existed in accordance with the standards set forth in Chapter 165 and/or Chapter 96 of the Code of Ordinances, and did furnish the respective owne r ( s) of the land(s) described in the attached list with written notice of unsafe building and detailed report of conditions and notice to vacate as the Building Official determined that the building was manifestly unsafe and is considered a hazard to life and public welfare pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances describing the nature of the violations and sent notices that the build- ing was to be vacated and that the building was to be repaired or demolished; work must be begun within sixty (60) days and all work must be completed within such time as the Building Official determines, said notice also advised that all appeals must be filed within thirty (30 ) days from the date of service of the notice and failure to file an appeal or to make the repairs required that the Building Official would have the authority to have the building demolished from the date of the said notice; and, WHEREAS, all the notice requirements contained within Chapter 165 have been complied with; and, WHEREAS, neither an appeal to the Board of Construction Appeals or corrective action was undertaken in accordance with the order of the Chief Building Official; therefore pursuant to Section 165.41 the Build- ing Official caused the abatement action to be done; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach has, pursuant to Section 165.42 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, submitted to the City Commission a report of the costs incurred in abating said condition as aforesaid, said report indicating the costs per parcel of land involved; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Be ach , pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances desires to assess the cost of said condition against said property owner(s). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: 34 "," - .._-- --------.- - ------------ -- . --...--- - - - - --- .--- - -~ ----.---- .- -------.---- Section 1. That assessments in the amount of as shown by the report of the City Manager of the City of Delray a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby levied against the parcel(s) of land described in said report and in the amount(s) indi- cated thereon. Said assessments so lev ied shall, if not paid within thirty (30) days after mailing of the notice described in Section 165,42 become a lien upon the respective lots and parcel(s) of land described in said report, of the same nature and to the same extent as the lien for general city taxes and shall be collectible in the same manner and with the same penalties and under the same provisions as to sale and foreclosure as City taxes are collectible. Section 2. That such assessments shall be legal, valid and binding obligations upon the property against which said assessments are levied. Section 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach is hereby directed to immediately mail by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the owner(s) of the property, as such ownership appears upon the records of the County Tax Assessor, notice(s) that the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has levied an assess- ment against said property for the cost of abatement action regarding an unsafe building by the thirty (30) days after the mailing date of said notice of assessment, after which a lien shall be placed on said proper- ty, and interest will accrue at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum, plus reasonable attorney's fees and other costs of collecting said sums. Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days from the date of adoption and the assessment(s) contained herein shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice of said assessment(s), after which a lien shall be placed on said property(s), and interest shall accrue at the rate of six percent (6% ) per annum plus reasonable attorney's fee and other costs of collection. Section 5. That in the event that payment has not been re- ceived by the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice of assessment, the City Clerk is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this resolution in the public records of Palm Beach County, Florida, and upon the date and time of recording of the certi- fied copy of this resolution a lien shall become effective on the subject property which shall secure the cost of abatement, interest at the rate of 6%, and collection costs including a reasonable attorney's fee. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the day of , 1990. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk - 2 - Res. No. 43-90 'I<. NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT Date TO: Ann M. Roseboro I. ADDRESS: 322 SW 7th Avenue, Delray Beach, Fl 33444 I 701 NW First Street, Delray Beach, Fl 33444 PROPERTY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 20, Block 4, Monroe according to Plat Book 14, Page 67 of the official records of Palm Beach County, Fl. , You, as the record owner of, ~or holder of an interest in, the above- described property are hereby advised that a cost of $I,QRO 00 by resolution of the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, dated , 1990, has been levied against the above-described property. The costs were incurred as a result of a nuisance abatement action regarding the above-described property. You were given notice on 9-6-89 that the Building Official has determined that a building located on the above-described property was unsafe. You were advised in that notice of the action that would be taken to remedy that unsafe condition and that the action would be initiated on an emergency basis by the City. x You failed to appeal the decision of the Building Official to the Board of Construction Appeals although you were informed of your right to an appeal and of the procedures for obtaining appeal, You have also failed to take the corrective action required by the notice of the Building Official, You appealed the decision of the Building Official to the Board of Construction Appeals, You were given written notification on that you were required to take the corrective action required by the decision of the Board of Construction Appeals within a stated period of time. You failed to take the action as required by the order of the Board of Construction Appeals. You appealed the decision of the Building Official to the Board of Construction Appeals on . The Board of Construction upheld the decision of the Building Official, An emergency action was undertaken at the above described property to remove an unsafe condition. An appeal was not received 30 days after the action was taken although you may still have an appeal right as to the cost of the action. The City of Delray Beach has therefore taken remedial action to remove the unsafe condition existing on the above-described property on 3-26-QO at a cost of $1.980.00 which includes a ten percent (10%) administrative fee. If you fail to pay this cost within thirty (30) days, that cost shall be recorded on the official Records of Palm Beach County, Florida against the above-described property. Copy of all notices referred to in this notice are available in the . office of the Building Official. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION. . City Clerk . ... _ ___4._ _____- __.. _..-._- --- ~ - ---..-- --_. ---- - _._--- -- -_._- ....------.. -- RESOLUTION NO, 44-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 165, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS FOR ABATEMENT ACTION REGARDING AN UNSAFE BUILDING ON LAND(S) LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH; SETTING OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABATEMENT AND LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH ACTION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND INTEREST ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE RECORDING OF THIS RESOLU- TION, AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO BE .A LIEN UPON THE I SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR UNPAID ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE MAILING OF NOTICE. WHEREAS, the Building Official or his designated representative has, pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances, declared the existence of an unsafe building upon certain lots or parcels of land, described in the list attached hereto and made a part hereof, for violation of the building codes and building requirements adopted by Chapter 165 and those Codes adopted in Chapter 96 of the Code of Ord- inances; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, the Building Official or his designated representative has inspected said land(s) and has determined that an unsafe building existed in accordance with the standards set forth in Chapter 165 and/or Chapter 96 of the Code of Ordinances, and did furnish the respective owner(s) of the land(s) described in the attached list with written notice of unsafe building and detailed report of conditions and notice to vacate as the Building Official determined that the building was manifestly unsafe and is considered a haz ard to life and public welfare pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances describing the nature of the violations and sent notices that the build- ing was to be vacated and that the building was to be repaired or demolished; work must be begun within sixty (60) days and all work must be completed within such time as the Building Official determines, said notice also adv ised that all appeals must be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of the notice and failure to file an appeal or to make the repairs required that the Building Official would have the authority to have the building demolished from the date of the said notice; and, WHEREAS, all the notice requirements contained within Chapter 165 have been complied with; and, WHEREAS, neither an appeal to the Board of Construction Appeals or corrective action was undertaken in accordance with the order of the Chief Building Official; therefore pursuant to Section 165.41 the Build- ing Official caused the abatement action to be done; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of De lray Beach has, pursuant to Section 165.42 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, submitted to the City Commission a report of the costs incurred in abating said condition as aforesaid, said report indicating the costs per parcel of land involved; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances desires to assess the cost of said condition against said property owner(s). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: 3'- .., --_.----- --- - ..- - -..- -- ~-- ----- .- --..-.-------.-. -- -------------- - --, - _. . Section 1, That assessments in the amount of as shown by the report of the City Manager of the City of Delray a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby levied against the parcel(s) of land described in said report and in the amount(s) indi- cated thereon. Said assessments so levied shall, if not paid within thirty (30) days after mailing of the notice described in Section 165,42 become a lien upon the respective lots and parcel (s) of land described in said report, of the same nature and to the same extent as the lien for general city taxes and shall be collectible in the same manner and with the same penalties and under the same provisions as to sale and foreclosure as City taxes are collectible. Section 2. That such assessments shall be 1 eg aI, valid and binding obligations upon the property against which said assessments are levied. Se ction 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach is hereby directed to immediately mail by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the owner(s) of the property, as such ownership appears upon the records of the County Tax Assessor, notice(s) that the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has levied an assess- ment against said property for the cost of abatement action regarding an unsafe building by the thirty (30) days after the mailing date of said notice of assessment, after which a lien shall be placed on said proper- ty, and interest will accrue at the rate of six percent (6 %) per annum, plus reasonable attorney's fees and other costs of collecting said sums, Section 4. That this resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days from the date of adoption and the assessment(s) contained herein shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice of said assessment(s), after which a lien shall be placed on said property(s) , and interest shall accrue at the rate of six percent (6 %) per annum plus reasonable attorney's fee and other costs of collection. Section 5. That in the event that payment has not been re- ceived by the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice of assessment, the City Clerk is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this resolution in the public records of Palm Beach County, Florida, and upon the da te and time of recording of the certi- fied copy of this resolution a lien shall become effective on the subject property which shall secure the cost of abatement, interest at the rate of 6 %, and collection costs including a reasonable attorney's fee. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the day of , 1990. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk - 2 - Res. No, 44-90 ...,¡ NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT Date TO: David C. and Felice P, Ledbetter ; ADDRESS: J 760 NW 7th street. Delray Beach, Fl 33444 PROPERTY: 1021 Germantown Road. Delray Beach. Fl 33444 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 12 le~~ E211' ~nn Nly 1R' nf Wly l)Q', F.Qqllir~ acco~ding to Plat Book 23. Page 43 of the official records of Palm Beach County, Fl , You, as the record owner of, ~or holder of an interest in, the above- described property are hereby advised that a cost of $l,?Ql ~o by resolution of the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, dated , 1990, has been levied against the above-described property. The costs were incurred as a result of a nuisance abatement action regarding the above-described property, You were given notice on 1-16-90 that the Building Official has determined that a building located on the above-described property was unsafe. You were advised in that notice of the action that would be taken to remedy that unsafe condition and that the action would be initiated on an emergency basis by the City. x You failed to appeal the decision of the Building Official to the Board of Construction Appeals although you were informed of your right to an appeal and of the procedures for obtaining appeal. You have also failed to take the corrective action required by the notice of the Building Official, You appealed the decision of the Building Official to the Board of Construction Appeals. You were given written notification on that you were required to take the corrective action required by the decision of the Board of Construction Appeals within a stated period of time, You failed to take the action as required by the order of the Board of Construction Appeals, You appealed the decision of the Building Official to the Board of Construction Appeals on . The Board of Construction upheld the decision of the Building Official. An emergency action was undertaken at the above described property to remove an unsafe condition. An appeal was not received 30 days after the action was taken although you may still have an appeal right as to the cost of the action. The City of Delray Beach has therefore taken remedial action to remove the unsafe condition existing on the above-described property on 4-9-90 at a cost of $1 r 7 q 1 . ~o which includes a ten percent (10%) administrative fee. If you fail to pay this cost within thirty (30) days, that cost shall be recorded on the official Records of Palm Beach County, Florida against the above-described property. Copy of all notices referred to in this notice are available in the office of the Building Official. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION. City Clerk .. ,~ , -~.' - -~ - --.-- - ~--_.._-- ----- - - -- - - -- - - ----~_. .. .------- --------~--------- _._--~-, -----~-~--_.- RESOLUTION NO 45-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 165, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS FOR ABATEMENT ACTION REGARDING AN UNSAFE BUILDING ON LAND(S) LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH; SETTING OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABATEMENT AND LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH ·ACTION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND INTEREST ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE RECORDING OF THTS RES()T,{J- TION, AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO BE A LIEN UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR UNPAID ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE MAILING OF NOTICE. WHEREAS, the Building Official or his designated representative has, pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code 0 f Ordinances, declared the existence of an unsafe building upon certain lots or parcels of land, described in the list attached hereto and made a part hereof, for violation of the building codes and building requirements adopted by Chapter 165 and those Codes adopted in Chapter 96 of the Code of Ord- inances; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, the Building Official or his designated representative has inspected said land(s) and has determined that an unsafe building existed in accordance with the standards set forth in Chapter 165 and/or Chapter 96 of the Code of Ordinances, and did furnish the respective owner(s) of the land(s) described in the attached list with written notice of unsafe building and detailed report of conditions and notice to vacate as the Building Official determined that the building was manifestly unsafe and is considered a hazard to life and public welfare pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances describing the nature of the violations and sent notices that the build- ing was to be vacated and that the building was to be repaired or demolished; work must be begun within sixty (60) days and all work must be completed within such time as the Building Official determines, said notice also advised that all appeals must be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of the notice and failure to file an appeal or to make the repairs required that the Building Official would have the authority to have the building demolished from the date of the said notice; and, WHEREAS, all the notice requirements contained within Chapter 165 have been complied with; and, WHEREAS, neither an appeal to the Board of Construction Appeals or corrective action was undertaken in accordance with the order of the Chief Building Official; therefore pursuant to Section 165,41 the Build- ing Official caused the abatement action to be done; and, WH EREAS , the City Manager of the City of De lr a y Beach has, pursuant to Section 165.42 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of De lray Beach, submitted to the City Commission a report of the costs incurred in abating said condition as aforesaid, said report indicating the costs per parcel of land invo~ved; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of . the City of Delray Beach, pursuant to Chapter 165, of the Code of Ordinances desires to assess the cost of said condition against said property owner(s). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: ~~ 0'" · - '-- -- '--'--'-" ~---- ~.. -. ------ - -.-.-- --~ ..- ,- - -- - ._-- ---------- --------- ._-- - ~ ----., --. ._- --.------ - Section l. That assessments in the amount of as shown by the report of the City Manager of the City of Delray a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby levied against the parcel(s) of land described in said report and in the amount(s) indi- cated thereon. Said assessments so levied shall, if not paid within thirty (30) days after mailing of the notice described in Section 165,42 become a lien upon the respective lots and parcel(s) of land described in said report, of the same nature and to the same extent as the lien for general city taxes and shall be collectible in the same manner and with the same penalties and under the same provisions as to sale and foreclosure as City taxes are collectible. Section 2. That such assessments shall be legal, valid and binding obligations upon the property against which said assessments are levied. Section 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach is hereby directed to immediately mail by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the owner(s) of the property, as such ownership appears upon the records of the County Tax Assessor, notice(s) that the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has levied an assess- ment against said property for the cost of abatement action regarding an unsafe building by the thirty (30) days after the mailing date of said notice of assessment, after which a lien shall be placed on said proper- ty, and interest will accrue at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum, plus reasonable attorney's fees and other costs of collecting said sums, Section 4, That this resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days from the date of adoption and the assessment(s) contained herein shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice of said assessment(s) , after which a lien shall be placed on said property(s), and interest shall accrue at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum plus reasonable attorney's fee and other costs of collection. Section 5. That in the event that payment has not been re- ceived by the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the mailing date of the notice of assessment, the City Clerk is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this resolution in the public records of Palm Beach County, Florida, and upon the da te and time 0 f recording 0 f the certi- fied copy of this resolution a lien shall become effective on the subject property which shall secure the cost of abatement, interest at the rate of 6%, and collection costs including a reasonable attorney's fee. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the day of , 1990. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk , - 2 - Res. No. 45-90 " ,~ NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT Date TO: David C. and Felice P, Ledbetter ADDRESS: 760 NW 7th Street, Delray Beach, FI 33444 PROPERTY: 902 SW 10th Street, Delray Beach, Florida 33444 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 11 less S60 feet, Esquire according to Plat Book 23, P~g~ ú1 nf rh~ nffiri~l ~ø~n~AQ nf P~lm ~A~~~ CQYAty, Fl , You, as ~he record owner ,of, ·or holder of an interest in, the above- described property are hereby advised that a cost of $1,511.40 by resolution of the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, dated , 1990, has been levied against the above-described property. The costs were incurred as a result of a nuisance abatement action regarding the above-described property. You were given notice on 1-22-90 that the Building Official has determined that a building located on the above-described property was unsafe, You were advised in that notice of the action that would be taken to remedy that unsafe condition and that the action would be initiated on an emergency basis by the City. x You failed to appeal the decision of the Building Official to the Board of Construction Appeals although you were informed of your right to an appeal and of the procedures for obtaining appeal. You have also failed to take the corrective action required by the notice of the Building Official. You appealed the decision of the Building Official to the Board of Construction Appeals. You were given written notification on that you were required to take the corrective action required by the decision of the Board of Construction Appeals . within a stated period of time. You failed to take the action as required by the order of the Board of Construction Appeals. You appealed the decision of the Building Official to the Board of Construction Appeals on . The Board of Construction upheld the decision of the Building Official. An emergency action was undertaken at the above described property to remove an unsafe condition. An appeal was not received 30 days after the action was taken although you may still have an appeal right as to the cost of the action. The City of Delray Beach has therefore taken remedial action to remove the unsafe condition existing on the above-described property on 4-9-90 at a cost of $1,511.40 which includes a ten percent (10%) administrative fee, If you fail to pay this cost within thirty (30) days, that cost shall be recorded on the official Records of Palm Beach County, Florida against the above-described property. Copy of all notices referred to in this notice are available in the office of the Building Official. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION. . City Clerk , ,HI , ~ RESOLUTION NO. 47-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING THE APPROVAL AND ACQUISITION OF THE WEST ATLANTIC AVENUE/BARWICK ROAD SITE FOR THE NEW CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL. I WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of De1ray Beach recognizes the importance of quality education and adequate school ,I facilities in the continuing growth, development and especially redevelopment of the City; and, /I WHEREAS, the City Commission established the City's De1ray Beach Education Board by Resolution No. 54-89 and amended by Resolution No. 2 3- 9 0 ; and, WHEREAS, the Education Board is empowered with specific duties and responsibilities as defined in Section 3(E) of Resolution No. 54-89, to develop recommendations to the City Commission for forwarding to the Palm Beach County School Board regarding actions which may be taken in support of schools in Delray Beach; and, WHEREAS, the Palm Beach County School Board, by formal action at a regular meeting on April 4, 1990, approved a staff recommendation to conduct environmental studies on a proposed site for the new Carver Middle School which is identified as 28 acres of vacant land at the northeast corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Barwick Road; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission finds the proposed site to be consistent with the Consensus Statement regarding the placement of new schools on "neutral sites", NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Commission supports the approval and acquisition of the West Atlantic Avenue/Barwick Road site for the new Carver Middle School. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 24th day of April, 1990. MAY 0 R ATTEST: City Clerk , I I 31 \ . MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COMMISSION FROM: LULA BUTLER, DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT~ RE: REQUEST TO SUPPORT ACQUISITION OF SITE SELECTION FOR THE NEW ëARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL/PROPOSED RESOLUTION - DATE: April 19, 1990 BACKGROUND: Palm Beach County School Board formally authorized their staff to conduct required Environmental Studies on the proposed new site under consideration for the "New Carver Middle School" at their regularly-scheduled meeting of April 4, 1990. The site under consideration is located at the corner of West Atlantic Avenue and Barwick Road. The proposed location is considered to be in compliance with policies approved under the Consensus Statement which has been accepted as the road map for improving Delray Beach schools over the next three years. The Education Board unanimously supports the acquistion of the West Atlantic Avenue/Barwick Road site for Carver Middle School. The site is considered to be in a "neutral" location for the community and would provide the opportunity to racially balance the school according to the School Board's established policy. RECOMMENDATION: The Education Board is requesting that the City Commission formally support the acquisition and relocation of Carver Middle School to the West Atlantic Avenue/Barwick Road site by Resolution, and authorize the same to be sent to the School Board. Staff has drafted the proposed resolution for your consideration and approval. cc: Education Board File b:Carver.Res/LB4 . . , I .~ . r f ~ II¡ 1 ~ 1 M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Robert A. Barcinski, Acting City Manager THROUGH: John W. Elliott, Jr., Assist.nt City H.n.g~ Manage~ent Services FROM: Ted Glas. Purchasing Director ør4' DATE. April 9, 1990 SUBJECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 24, 1990 - BID AWARD - BID .90-3~ 1~~2_SIBEEI_BESUBEQCl~'_eBQJEtI lì~o_&.!g~._C1ì~_CQOO12~1gDL The City Co~~ission is requested to award contract to low bidder, Co~~unity Asphalt Corpor.at ion, at a cost of $216,866.9~~_ Per the Budget Office, fundin~ ~~ fro~~ccount . ;j...J!I.- Jl.~íllj ~Jdl~.J. ( lj<bt.'-L.':...L1::. f..C2'l.,;;:L, /:y-t .../...J - ..~. ~ - . ----------") - - -- ------ ~~~~ ~----------------- . a.t;KQJ:OUDd.1 Scope of Work: Furnish all labor, ~at.rials, and equip~ent to resurface and stripe 29 streets .a~ounting to approxi~.at.ly ~.8 ~il.s of roadway, and to construct a 4250 foot x ~ foot wide bike path along the West side of Ho~ewood Boulevard fro~ Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue. Bids for this project were received on April 2, 1990, fro~ four (4) contractors, all in accordance with City purchasing procedures. (Bid .90-35. Docu~entation on file in the Purchasing Office.) A tabulation of bids is attached for your review. The low bidder was 5ub~itted by Co~~unity Asphalt Corporation, at a cost of $216,866.95. Engineering's esti~ate for this work is $230,000.00. Bet;Qðð.Dd.:tj,OD.1 Staff reco~Mends award to the low bidder, C~~unity Asphalt Corporation, for the total .~ount of $216,866.95 per th. unit price. and e.ti~at.d quantities. Funding as outlined above. e:t:t.Ç,tlð.Dt~L Tabulation of Bids Rec~~endation fro~ Engineering Dept. pc Gates Castle 3'ðf\ ~ "j - RESURFACING 1990 , STREETS FROM TO Reigle Avenue Swinton Avenue Mango Drive NW 11th Avenue NW 3rd street NW 3rd Terrace Bauhinia Road A-1-A Seasage Drive Palm Trail NE 3rd Street NE 5th Street Poinsettia Drive Germantown Road West End Hibiscus Road A-1-A Seasage Drive Gardenia Drive Boone Drive East End NW 2nd Avenue NW 1st street NW 2nd street Seagate Drive Melaleuca Drive Carissa Road Tropic Isle Drive Tropic Isle Drive N-S US #1 Hyacinth Drive Spanish Trail East End SW 8th street Swinton Avenue SW 2nd Avenue Eagle Drive Blue Jay Road 660 Feet South Florida Boulevard Avenue "L" Iris Drive Audubon Boulevard Lindell Boulevard Bridge Jaeger Drive Curlew Road Bobolink RoadOcean Ocean Terrace Gleason Street A-1-A SW 6th Street SW 6th Avenue SW 8th Avenue Carrissa Road Seagate Drive A-1-A Linnet Circle Curlew Drive Albatross Road Florida Boulevard LaMat 660 Feet North Fern Drive Gardenia East End NE 3rd Avenue NE 3rd street NE 4th street Poinsettia Road Seagate Drive Seasage Drive Sandoway Lane Andrews Avenue East End SW 20th Court Congress Avenu~ Lowson Boulevard Spanish Circle Tropic Isle Drive East End Coral ita Lane Casuarina Road Bucida Road NE 4th street Federal Highway East Intracoastal K-1 . . , . . r 1 t II ~ , . ¡ T A e ~ L ' i J C N ^ c 8 I Ù 5 v r 3 ; ~ . ~':r - j 5 '930 S7;E~7 ~~S.~;~C:~~ APRIL 02. '9% :. Community " J, W, Cheatham I Pave x Hardrives ,ENDOR ~halt, Corp. Inc, Corporation Asphalt Co, ITEM .: ---- ---- ~. ~urr.~5r.,r.a"¡:c:ace aspna1~ 34,00 / ton 39,50 / ton 32.85 / ton 32.45 / ton concrete for streets Tyce 5-3 176,800,00 205,400,00 170,820,00 168,740,00 _ 5200 tOnS ~ 2, A~JUstlng Manno)e 110,00 / each 130,00 / each 120,00 / each 90,00 / each Fralle , Cover 5,500,00 6,500.00 6,000.00 4,500,00 5Q 8Ich I 3, Adjustlng Inlet 350,00 / each 250.00 / each : 750,00 / each 450,00 / each Grates 750,00 450,00 350,00 250.00 1 sacn -------- -------------------- 4, AdJustlng \aive Boxes 75,00 / each 40,00 / each 35,00 / each 40,00 / each ¡ ì for water gatesl 1,125,00 600,00 525,00 600.00 ___11_~-ª£.!!_ ---------- --- 5, TherIa Pìastlc Street Marklngs - - lal SOilds and Dash Yellow Centerl ine St, Marklngs 7,875,00 11,550,00 8,700,00 7,875,00 _____LuIllQ_Su! ICi Wnlte Edge of Roadway or Lane Markings 252,00 370.00 300.00 250,00 ---1Y~_â~1 ICI StoD Bars 37,80/ each 27.00 / each 40,00 / each 27,00 / each 75 each 2,835.00 2,025,00 3,000.00 2,025,00 I d I Crosswa 1 ks 157,50 / each 111. 00 / each 180,00 / each 85,00 / each , eacn 315,00 222,00 360.00 170,00 Ie) Schoo; Locatlons 170.10 / each 300.00 / each 190,00 / each 185,00 / each Markings 850, ~O 1,500,00 950,00 925,00 ----Lu£h if) Single Head Dlrectlon 42,00/ each 50.00 / each 50,00 / each 45,00 / each Arrow Marklng& 210.00 250.00 250.00 225,00 ~_each Ig) Double Head Dlrectlon 84.00 / each 90.00 / each 90,00 / each 60.00 / each Arrow Marklngs 84.00 90.00 90.00 60.00 _LU£" Ihi ONLY Dlrectlon 82.95 / each 100.00 / each 90,00 / each 80,00 / each Markings 82.95 100.00 90.00 80.00 __LU~[ 6, Bltullinous Concrete Sidewalk 4.75/L.F, 1 0 , 00 / 1. F , 8.35 / 1. F, 8.25 / L.F. 1ncluolng Rock Base 20,187,50 42,500,00 35,487.50 $35,062.50 __!f~QJ,..L. $216.866.95 $271,557,00 $226,922.50 $220.762,50 GRANO TOTAL COMMENTS/EXCEPTIONS Complete all Complete all Complete all Complete all work fully with work fully with- work fully with- work fully Wirh-¡ in 45 calendar in 100 calendar in 60 calendar in 90 calendar days after no- days after noticl days after days after tice to proceed to proceed, notice to proceed, notice to pro- ! ceed. Bid Bond Sub- Bid Bond Sub- Bid Bond Sub- Bid Bond Sub- mitted mit ted. mitted. mitted. . I I ~ . f , ~ . ; ". ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: TED GLAS PURCHASING THRU: )JÀL GATES D. CASTLE, P.E. CITY ENGINEER ~. FROM: , '. I CHARLES AXELROD ,/ CIVIL ENGINEER SUBJECT: 1990 STREET RESURFACING PROJECT NO.# 03-01-90-DB DATE: APRIL 6, 1990 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Engineering Department has reviewed the bids for the subject project. Based upon this review, it is recommended that the Contract be awarded to Community Asphalt Co. based on their low bid of $216,866.95. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $230,000.00. SCOPE OF WORK To resurface and stripe 29 streets amounting to approximately 4.8 miles of roadway and to construct a 4250 foot - five foot wide bike path along the west side of Homewood Boulevard from Linton Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue Money available . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $250,000.00 Account No.# 334-3162-541-60.53 ~ , I . r . i , ~ ~ f I .'. · M E M 0 RAN DUM TOI Robert A. Øarcinski, Acting City Manag.r THROUGH I John w. Ellio~t, Jr., Assistant City Mana~ Hanag~nt "rvice. FR0t11 Ted Gla., Purcha.ing Director ~~ DATE I April 10, 1990 SU8.JECT I DOCUt1ENTATION - CITY COHHISSION MEETING - APRIL 24, 1990 - CONTRACT AWARD - e~gIQGBee~l~_sueeLIES_=_~_~~IBe~I It.e_"!gr._~it~_Cgeei..igD~ City C~i..ion i. reque.ted to award annual contract for photographic .upplies <fil,,) to Photoline Supplies, Inc. , via City of Boca Raton bid, at an e.ti"ated annual co.t of .20,000. Per the Budget Direc:~r, funding i. frOflt variou. d""yt_nts oper."ing budgets. --~;¡¡"'-~±"'-F~" --=-- < -- 1~_ ~ f Î ~__.::.__t.~_-1.5'~~..,5._________ ---'ift-Z_- ) · I.~kgrgynd~ The City ha. need for a for"al annual contract for photographic .uppli.. < fil..). The large.t u.er. are the Police o.part...nt and the C~nity IP\prov....nt Depart...nt. A contract i. available to u. via the City of Boc. Ratan bid for photographic .upplie.. By utilizing this contract, a .aving. of approxi~tely .2200. fraft current pricing would be realized. Deliyery ti... i. within 1-2 day. after phoning in order. Fil.. developing i. often needed quickly, and with fil" that is .00000ti.... u.ed a. evidence in legal "atter.. Therefore blanket purcha.e order. can be i..ued to local vendor. who offer reliable and fa.t developing service. Bel:Ql!M!tttDCIAtiQD.I It i. recOlVtended that awa rd of annual cant ract for photographic supplies be "ad. to Photoline Supplies, Inc. , via Boca Raton contract, at an ..ti...ted annu.l co.t of approxi...t.ly .20,000. Funding .. .tated above. ettAcbMDt.~ Pricing Info~ation Sh..t. Letter fraft Photoline Suppli.., Inc. pc Ha Jar Cach r.ne ~ß Lula 8utl.r "" Estimated Current Boca Bid Desciption: Quantities Cost Price Difference Kodacolor 100 GA 135, 2.22 / 1.90 / 12 expo 195 rolls 432.90 370.50 62,40 Kodacolor 100 GA 135 3.04 / 2.35 / 24 expo 174 rolls 528.96 408.90 120.06 Kodacolor 400 GB 135 2.87 / 2.55 / 12 expo 392 rolls 1125.04 999.60 125,44 Kodacolor 400 GB 135 3,86 / 3.30 / 24 expo 182 rolls 702.52 600.60 101,92 Polaroid 600 Plus 18.73 / 15,35 / twin pack 404 packs 7566.92 6201.40 1365.52 Polaroid 669 18,15 / 16.95 / twin pack 290 pakcs 5263.50 4915,50 348,00 Ektachrome 100 ED 135 4.35 I ' 3.85 I 24 expo 24 rolls 104.40 92.40 12.00 SX 70 twin pack 5 packs 18.55 / 15.35 / 92.75 76.75 16.00 Polaroid 667 11.72 / 11. 95 twin pack 144 packs 1687.68 1720.80 (+33,12) Kodacolor 200 GB 135 3.91 / 3.00 / 24 expo 120 rolls 469.20 360.00 109,20 Polaroid Spectra System 9.365 / 8.10 / sing.1e pack 120 packs 1123.80 972.00 151. 80 Polaroid 88 300 rolls 8.25 / 8.65 / 2475.00 2595.00 (+120,00) 21,572.67 19,313.45 2,259.22 . , I , .~ . r ; t ~ 1 I . , . Bid - "Photographic Supplies & Processing Services" BID QUOTATION PAGE (Continued) Will you extend the same prices, terms and~nditions to other governmental agencies wi thing Palm Beach County? Yes No ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The undersigned bidder certifies that this bid proposal is submitted in accordance with the bid provisions, specifications and conditions governing this bid. VENDOR: ~Tb l ,;'; P. SVfPL.t G.~ ,I,vc- , ADDRESS: Lfo~ Cn M If( elf c.P WA-v I /""0'1-Ll.JOûf)" ,c¡ò~/ì)/I 3J7 J"D CITY t STATE & ZIP CODE: ~ 0111 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TYPED NAME & TITLE OF ABOVE: 3)014 ¡IV/c.f M Ç.i?M/~Itt?A , Ilks /~ (',ifJí I ~ J TELEPHONE NUMBER~ 8'ð¡)-J.."¡7- ?!?9¥ DATE: 2.. ¡s-/9ù ~ .. FEDERAL 1. D . 11: ,çq...,:;, /) .3 !'So I All bids shall be in a sealed envelope and marked on the exterior "Sealed Bid for Photographic Sup-plies & Processing Services." Bid opening February 22, 1990, at 3: 00 p. m. , City Hall, 201 W. Palmetto Park Road, Boca Raton, Florida, Purchasing Office. , DW!816!1S -12- . , f . . ~ ~ , .. . ~ i ,,'. . '~ .. ". .\ . . Bid - "Photographic Supplies & Processing Services" BID QUOTATION PAGE LOT I: FILM ESTIMATED ANNUAL UNIT TOTAL ITEM NO DESCRIPTION USAGE PRICE BID COLOR NEGATIVE FILM ~" 1 Kodacolor 100 GA 135~12 180 Rolls $ J. 90 IRL $ 34} >)< " GA 13~-24 70 " $:¿.l), /m. $ Ib . S-ù . , " GA 135-36 70 " $c:l.9:f 1m. $ ~d,S'o 2 Kodacolor 200 GB 135-24 10 Roll~- $3,au 1m. $ "0.CÙ 3 Kodacolor 400 GC 135-12 250 Rolls $.2. ~.5'" IRL $ L 31. $"" 0 " GC 135-24 40 " $ ·3.)0 1m. $/3,2, CC " GC 135-36 175 " $ "':,),)" IRL $ '7'1 ~. 7{ 4 Kodacolor 1000 CF 135-12 25 Rolls $J.1j /RL $1/ J.~ CF 135-24 10 Rolls $3/Y~ IRL $ '39.:;0 CF 135-36 20 Rolls $ ~..1 /m. $//5.01..' Fujicolor 200 CA 135-36 30 Rolls / 5 $10) IRL $9/.5"0 BLACK & WHITE FILM 6 Kodak T-Max 100 TMX 135-24 20 Rolls $~ .Llq IRL $If 9. F/ù TMX 135-36 20 Rolls $3'~b /m. $b9J.ð 7 Kodak T-Max 400 THY 135-24 20 Rolls $J.~v /RL $5.1.00 mY 135-36 20 Rolls $'J,ê; 1m. $ f71. (,() INSTANT COLOR PRINT FILM POLAROID 8 600-Plus (Twin-Pack) 400 Packs $/<'JŠtPK $ bHo.C0 9 667 (Twin-Pack) 100 Packs $/I,Ij{ IPK $11 H. 00 10 668 (Twin-Pack) 100 Packs $17.,.;'/PK $/7c¡ç \11) 11 669 (Twin-Pack) 600 Packs $/b·'JS"/PK $/v)17,;,&)0 12 SX 70 (Twin-Pack) 85 Packs $/~,J,f/PK $1'!,o"'¡,1!' COLOR POSITIVE FILM 13 Ektachrome 100 EC 135-24 12 Rolls $3/,r( IRL $I.JtJ.O 14 Ektachrome 400 EL 135-24 7 Rolls $'f"Ç"O 1m. $ 3Q, S'o EL 135-36 6 Rolls $rJ, ; } IRL $ '4 ~ ...L " 15 Ektachrome 800/1600 EES 135-36 5 Rolls $/¡).Y11m. $~~,;$" 16 Ekt3chrome 25 KR 135-24 6 Rolls $ Lj.,}. ~ IRL $1.';. ~ ù TOTAL LOT I: $~1)C\ql bD -8- \ . . I ~ . r i t ~ .. : I I . . Bid - "Photographic Supplies & Processing Services" BID QUOTATION PAGE (Continued) LOT II: PROCESSING ESTIMATED PROCESSING & ANNUAL PRINT COST ITEM NO DESCRIPTION USAGE PER ROLL TOTAL PROCESSING COLOR NEGATIVE FILM & STANDARD PRINTING C-41 PROCESS AND STANDARD PRINTS (3 ~XS" 4X6") USING KODAK OR FUJI PAPER ONLY 17 35MM, 12 Exp. roll 30 Rolls $~ ,b 5' IRL $~ 18 35}M, 24 Exp. roll 60 RoUs f;q{ IRL $ ~..:~ 1,Où 19 35MM, 36 Exp. roll 110 Rolls $ Y,Y(/RL $~, S -.;- v E-6 PROCESSING 20 35MM, 24 Exp. roll 6 Rolls $:1-;-0 IRL $..;U. cO 21 3SMM, 36 Exp. roll 20 Rolls $( 61) IRL $/00.oc COLOR ENLARGEMENTS FROM COLOR NEGATIVES FROM 3SMM AND 120 SIZE NEGATIVES 22 3-~XS" or 4X6" 2000 Each $ ,t~ lEA $300.00 /' $ I ~.J SO 23 5X7" 190 Each $.7) /EA 24 8X10" 25 Each $1f·<15 lEA $ftJ·Çu 25 11X14" 5 Each $ID,ù~} /EA $ 50,0\) 26 16X20" 5 Each $/c. æ/EA $qO.(}Ù COLOR ENLARGEMENTS FROM COLOR POSITIVES (SLIDES) FROM 3SMM AND 120 SIZE NEGATIVES , 27 3-ix5" SO Each $4..1.( lEA $ J 11..~ D 28 8X10" SO Each $ S:-;O lEA $J.1s,~"Û BLACK & WHITE ~~ARGEMENTS FROM BLACK & WHITE NEGATIVES FROM 35MM AND 120 SIZE NEGATIVES 29 8X10" 75 Each $ ~ tJl) lEA $1 ?S. OV -9- . I , . , , ; ~ 1 t ¡ ..'. . . Bid - "Photographic Supplies & Processing Services" BID QUOTATION PAGE (Continued) LOT II: PROCESSING (Continued) ESTIMATED PROCESSING & ANNUAL PRINT COST ITEM NO DESCRIPTION USAGE PER ROLL TOTAL SPECIAL PROCESSING SERVICES 30 35MM REPRINTS: PRINTING AND 1500 Each $~/EA $J.~ ~ ~V PROCESSING OF COLOR PRINTS FROM COLOR NEGATIVES (3-2X5") ,- $~/EA $/51,<;0 31 35MM COLOR SLIDE MADE FROM A 70 Each 35MM COLOR NEGATIVE 8X10" COLOR CONTACT PROOF SHEET IS Each ' , $ 90 ,lfÙ 32 $ 6, l,l) lEA (FRO~ 1-8XIO" TRANSPARENCY OR 4-4X5" TRANSPARENCIES OR 1-120 SIZE ROLL OF SLIDE FILM OR 36-3sMM ROLL OF FILM) 33 8XI0" BLACK & WHITE CONTACT 50 Each $ S, v1) /EA $)S J 1J'ù PROOF SHEET (FROM 1-8XI0" NEGATIVE OR 4-4X5" NEGATIVES OR 1-120 SIZE ROLL OF FILM OR 36-35MM ROLL OF FILM) TOTAL LOT II: $ 3nt dJU I , -lO- t . , ., . r i : t ~ . , i ¡ \ ". Bid - "Photographic Supplies & Processing Services" BID QUOTATION PAGE (Continued) LOT III: MISCELLANEOUS ACCESSORIES AND SUPPLIES ESTIMATED PROCESSING & ANNUAL PRINT COST ITEM NO DESCRIPTION USAGE PER ROLL TOTAL 34 Magicubes (4 flash) 3!pkg. 500 Pkgs. $ /. ? ¡ !PKG $ S'S{õV 35 AA batteries, Alkaline~ 3800 Each $ t 3 '& lEA $('4~~. DC Duracell 36 Contact Sheets BIW, TX 135-24 50 Sheets $5·5'0 lEA $ .j1~ UV 37 Contact Sheets B/W, TX 135-36 50 Sheets $5.50/EA $:¡ 1S": (,Ì) 38 Heavy Duty Negative Protectors 2 Box $/.~ ~ /BX $~H ' (}J to fit in 3-ring binders (100 sheets per box) 'v 39 Heavy Duty Clear Print 10 Box $ ~ iì 7" /BX $+00.00 holders for 3-ring binder notebooks ¡¡Ù 40 Pakon 35MM slide film 1 Case $7 {,'7/CS $1 ), ~rJ mounts, 2500 bulk pack " 41 Vue-all Neg-saver pages, 100 25 Packs $/'7 ~ o/PK $ :¡31 50 sh. pack. Seven-S frame strips, prod. 118020 ,fIJ $ Ii \). ~'1) 42 Vue-all print protectors, 2 Packs $ £ S /PK 500 bulk pack. aX10" enlargements, prod. #5002 I~ / 43 Kodak Ektachrome 22 color 5 Box $ 6e !BX $30c,'/~ paper, aXIO", 100 sheet box CV $ 59.oJ.. 44 Kodak Ektachrome 22 color 1 Box $,SL/BX paper, llX14" , 50 sheet box 45 Kodak Ektachrome 22 color 1 Box $.£ ~ ¡'/BX $ ~~ ~I paper, 16X20", 50 sheet box (tV :.1t) ~~... It<."", ,'~~~ Iv \"4...:t b\)J' W~ S'0 t!I,,~ãe. I~ Fo.':' I\) d..2.lr ß...,J( TOTAL LOT III: $jO<:j\,., c¡ TOTAL LOTS I THROUGH III: $'?, a /?q /, à. ~ DELIVERY PROMISE: á'-l - 'I ~ ~.'R> ttf#- R (tec.~\·p7" .:'b c.e~ -11- . ¡ I , .. t ; : , ~ ~ i .. PHOTO LINE 404 COMMERCE WAY flORIDA CENTRAL COMMERCE PARK SUPPLIES INC ~~~~'(:-~~~:6~;~50 . ,. OutSIDE FL 1-800-l47-7894 fAX 407 -830.1405 March 26, 1990 Attn: Ms, Jackie Rooney, Bid SDecia1ist City of De1ray Beach 434 S, Swinton Ave. De1ray Beach, FL 33444 Dear Ms. Rooney, Pursuant to our telephone conversation we are pleased to inform you that Photoline SUDplies will honor the bid prices as given to the city of Boca Raton, as well as the terms and conditions, I understand you will be forwarding to me a blanket purchase order covering the next twelve months purchases, We look forward to a long and pleasant relationship, Verj"hly:ours. b7, 'Dominick Seminara Président . ' , I .~ . r , i . , '" ~ ¡ 'H~ M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Robert A. Barcinski, Acting City Manager THROUGH: John W. Elliott, Jr., As.istant City Hanag~ Manage~.nt S.rvices FROM: Ted Glas, Purchasing Director ~~ DATE; Ap r i 1 12, 1990 SUS~ECT: DOCUMENTATION - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 24, 1990 - PURCHASE AWARD QEEICE_EUB~lIUBE_EQB_CIIY_~A~~_E~e~51Q~ Itg~_i.!g~._C1t~_C~~1a~igDL City Co~~ission is requested to award cont rc1ct for office furniture to Busin.ss Environ~.nts, I nc ., at a cost of $56,080.0S. Per the Budget Director, funding is fro~: 13.3:~f2~e=-.1QLt..~-3..-.A..~_________ ( _-LfJ:..1_-t./.I~Z_'ir-.zü:-- - -- .J.úJ.A¡jQ.L.tct/....lLI.1'~..I:._~..u~ ) . (1'1f, tJlL 'I,l. ~~ It 1'/<.( J i.~Js.g.tgYD~J. tfk 'Ý¡:7/tO On March 13, 1990, City Co~~ission appropriated funds for office furniture for the new wing of City Hall. In addition to existing furniture, ite~s are needed for offices and co~~on areas for Engìn.ering, Planning and Co~~unit)' I~prove~ent, consisting of desks, chairs, credenzas, conference tables, bulletin boards and lunchroo~ furniture, per attached lists. Quality office furniture is available to us via Pal~ Beach County School Board Contract .SB90C-21L at 40.5" and 48" discounts fro~ list prices; and frOM Metro-Dad. County Contract .1072-1072-8/90 at a SO" discount. All prices include delivery and set-up in the o1ficas. Delivery tiMe is 4-6 weeks a1ter roceiving order. Bg~'U!JMDd.11gDL Sta11 r.co~~ends aWc1rd of cont ract for office 1urniture to Business Environ~.nt., Inc. at a cost of $S6,080.05. Funding as stated above. e11.~bl!t.D1.J. M.~o 1ro~ City Engineer Pricing Sheets pc Gates Castle ~ David Kovacs Lula Butler '1<4 _~NGINEERING DEPARTMENT M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: PURCHASING FROM: ~r GATES D. CASTLE, P.E. ~~ CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: FURNITURE - NEW WING OF CITY HALL DATE: APRIL 12, 1990 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I have reviewed Business Environments proposal (attached) for the subject furniture. It is recommended that the proposal be accepted in the reduced amount of $56,080.05. At their March 13th meeting, the City Commission appropriated a total of $63,250 for this furniture. The funding source was designated as unallocated interest income from the 1987 Utility Tax Bond. GDC:slg . I . , . , l : t " . , I ¡ ;1'01 . 2244 .SCAYNE IL\/O . MIAMI. F\. 33137 .1176-6100 UBlneBS . 1050 w SUNRISE 8L \/0 . I'T, LAUOEROALE. FL 33:1"·7 1 90 . ] ~ ~ nvll"Onment:& BOCA 427-9900, PAL" BEACH 732~OO QUALITY aUSINIl1 FURNISHINGS FAX' (305) 764·2932 QUO TAT 1 o N / S ALE S o R D E R .. S31074 PAGE 1 SOL [I TO : 2470 SHIP TO : 2470 De¡ray Beach, Ci ty elf City of Delray Beach 100 N.W. 1 Avenue 100 N.W. 1 Avenue ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY HALL NEW WING Del r.y Beach, Fl 33444 Del,.. y B.ach, Fl 33444 278-2110 SPECIAL INSTRUCTION r~TE ORDERED 04/06/90 SIR W1 CUST. P. o. '~UOTE SALESMAN Minnehan TERMS E.< - NET 10 DAYS SHIP VIA 2 ====================_=c======================================================== LINE ORD SHIP MODEL-DESC TYPE UNIT EX TN =========================================================c_=~===.============== 1 -_. - - eTCJ TAG: LOBBY 2 1 (I EXC33-22-(l01824 185.0(1 185.00 ...... - 18X24 CYL TBL 3 1 o EXC33-20-202024 235.00 235. 00 ~ - 20X20X24 SQ CUBE TBl 4 6 o KRUVCWA21 163.03 978.18 - > OR 1 FAB ~ '. . GUEST CHAIR ~ 1 ~ EXCTL-401-4296 517.50 51 7 . 50 ' -' - 42X96 RECT TBL é, --- . 163.03 1304.24 ,.,- e o KRlIVCWAL GR 1 FAB GUEST CHAIR 7 1 o GHNKPW 78.00 78.00- W(lO[) TR 1M 4X6 BULLETIN BOARD 8 :3 (I HRMCC117 262.08 786. 24 ~ GR 2 FAB _ _ _~G~~IA .L.Ç!~~~AC~K ~O~I<: ÇHAI R....w.ß:1 ßRMS_ .- -- -' --- 9 -~.. _. - ~- --..--...-. . ......-.:.:-..:.....~ -._--- eTC) TAG: DEVELOP SERV SECY - -- 10 ¿. o EXCA-0005-30b6 417.50 8:35, 0(1 . - 30X66 SP (IESK 11 ..., o EXCA-008-2445 812.50 625.00' ¿. LEFT HAND 24X45 SECY RETURN CONTINUED . . . . . . . { I · ~ . , , II · · ¡ .>. .. . 22~4 8ISCAYN£ IIlYO . MIAMI. Fl33137 . 578-6COO U8.nSBB . IO!>O W SUNRISE BLVD· Ft LAUDERDALE. FL 33311·7190 ' 764-6-' nvllonment:s ----- -- BOCA 427-9900 , PAlM BEACH 732....00 QUALITY SUSINESS FURNISHINGS FAX , 1305) 784-2t32 QUO TAT ION I S ALE S o ROE R 4t 831074 PAGE 2 =============_=====_====_=========______.c=================_=================== LINE ORD SHIP MODEL-DESC: TYPE UNIT EXTN ===a===c=_=======_c====_=============_=c=_=c================c===_._====c=~===== 12 1 o EXCA-OOOS-306ó 417.50 417.50 · - -- ----- - 30X66 SP J~~ESK - - --- - -----~ - --- - . ~. -- ---- ,..- . . -_. -- 1-' 1 o EXCÄ-:"ÒOS':"2445 312.50 312.50 . -=- RIGHT HAND _.- Æ1~~~ SECY RETURN 14 3 o EXCA-014-2066 427.50 1282. 5(1 . - CRED W-KNEEHOLE -,. - e... _ ~_ __ - . ._- -.-- --- -. - - ....--_. --_. - -- . --...-~---_.. -- -.-..-- --...-.....-. - 15 3 o EXCKD-260-0a22 122.50 367. 50 ' - KEYBOARD _. .FOR ABOVE.~ SECY DESKS 16 3 o HRMCCl17 262.08 786. 24 ~ OR 2 FAB 17 EQUA LOW-BACK WORK CHAIR W/O ARMS - - -~ -_. . -" .. .. - .- CTCJ TAG: DEVELOP DIRECTOR 18 1 o EXCA-005-3672 467~50 467. 50 ~ - 36X72 SP DESK ------------ :.:,.. 19 1 o EXCA-051-2447 187.50 187. 50 - - --~.x§7 .E~EC -..BRI[IG£ . - +_.. _._~--_...- ~- --- .- 20 1 o EXCA-220-2072 357.50 357. 50 - - ._ . .20X7..2... ~~çn -..-- -- -- - - .~ - - -- -------- 21 1 o EXCKD-260-0822 122.50 122.50 ' - KEYBOARD .-- FOR ABOVE EXEC DESK .-)-, 1 (I HRMCC129 375.44 375.44 ~¿;. OR 2 FAB - --_. ..- EQWLHl ~BACK 23 4 o KRUVCWAL 16~;o3 652.12 . GR 1 FAB (illEST CHAIR 24 1 (I EXCTL-408-(l036 277.50 277. 5() - 36" (lIA TEeL 25-- . 1 (I EXCBC-(l35-1236 302.50 302,50 - - . 36X12X48 BOOKCASE CONTINUED . . . . . . . . . I . ~ I . : ~ ~ , . ¡ , ~ ,,,. . . 2244I1SCAYNE "VD . MIMa, Fl 33137 .678..00 UIIInoø& 1050 W SUNRISE 8LVD . FT.LAUOEAOALE. FL 33311'7190. 7~~' . nvlranments BOCA 427·MOO. PAlM BEACH 732"00 OUALlTY BUSINES. FURNISHINGS FA)(, 1305) 784-2132 QUO TAT ION / SALES o R D E R .. S31074 PAGE 3 =============================================================================== LINE ORD SHIP MODEL-DESC TYPE UNIT EXTN ..._.c____=-=====c===_.....=_==_===_===========________=====--===-.-._.cc=c==== 26 rTCJ TAG I CONF ROOM 27 1 o EXCTL-401-48120 640.00 640. 00 ~ - 28 ---iC)-' 48X120 RE.!:T TElL ----------,-------- -~... o KRlIVCWAL 163.03 1630.30 . OR 1 FAB GUEST CHAIR 29 1 o HAR$26 345.00 345.00 - 4Xe WHITEBOARD W-WD TRIM 30 eTC] TAG I PLANNING DIRECTOR/S OFFICE 31 1 o EXCA-005-3672 467.50 467.50' - 36X72 SP DEStS.. - -. 32 1 o EXCA-051-2447 187.50 187.50' - 24X47 EXEC BRIDGE ~3 1 o EXCA-220-2072 357.50 357. 50 - .,... - 20X72 CRED ---- 34 1 o EXCKD-260-0822 122.50 122.50' - KEYBOARD FOR ABOVE EXEC DESK ---- - - 35 1 o EXCBC-035-1236 302.50 302.50 . - 36X12X4S BOOKCASE ------ -~ 36 4 o KRlIVCWAL 163.03 652.12 . GF< 1 FAB GUEST CHAIF< ---- 37 1 o EXCTL-408-0036 277.50 277.50' - 36" DIÁ TBL ~- . ~ 3B 1 o HARS22 185.00 185.00 &.1[1 TRIM -- -- n___~WX4ßl:LWHlJ£8C'ARD ~---- -., - -< --- -. -- - -- ._---- ------- 39 1 o HRMCC129 375.44 375.44 OF< 1 FAB EQUA HI-BACK -- - CONTINUED . _. . . . . . . . , · .. r : t Ì\ · · I , , .. . . 2244 81SCAVNE IlYO . MIAMI. Fl33137 . 676~OO US.noes 1050 W SUNRISE 8lYO . n,lAUOERDAl£, Fl33311·1190 . 1~- . nvtranrnent:& BOCA 427-ef1O( , PAlM lEACH 732-6eOO QUALITY BUSINE.S FURNISHINGS FAX , (305 784-a32 QUO TAT r 0 N I S ALE S o R D E R .. S31074 PAGE 4 =========;===================================================================== LINE ORD SHIP MODEL-DESC TYPE UNIT EXT -______a_=_c._..cc=_____.__.____=.==____=____=========_..__._.___.____________= 40 CTC) TAG a PLANNER I I I 41 1 o EXCA-005-3672 467.50 467.50 - 36X72 SP DESK ------- --- 42 1 (I EXCA-051-2447 187.50 187.50' - 24X47 EXEC BRIDGE - - _. 43 1 o EXCA-220-2072 357.50 357. 50 . - 2OX72 CRED 44 1 o EXCKD-260-0822 122.50 122.50 c - KEVBOARD FOR ABOVE EXEC DESK 45 2 o KRUVCWAL 163.03 326.06 - OR 1 FAB GlIEST CHAIR 46 1 o HRHCC119 303/68 303. 68 ~ " GR 2 FAB '" EQUA LOBACK SWVL TILT CHAIR -- --- TILT SWVL 47- .- - eTC] TAGa REMAINING PLANNERS 48 6 o EXCA-001-3060 497.50 2985.00 - - 30X60 DP DESK - -- 49 6 o EXCA-014-2066 427.50 2565.00 - CRED W-KNEEHClLE .--------------- ---- 50 6 (I EXCKD-260-0822 122.50 735.00 - KEYBOARD FOR ABOYE EXEC nç~K -.- - 51 4 o EXCBC-035-1236 302.50 1210.00 - 36X12X48 BOOKCASE ---...--- -. . - 52 ~, <) HRMCCl19 303.68 1822.08 GR 2 FAB EQUA LOBACK SWVL TILT CHAIR ,-::::-- --"- -- - .---31LI_SW.L..__ ______ _._- CONTINUED . . . . . . . . , .. r . , t ~ ~ . I ¡ ... . 22" 8/SCA'tNE aVD . "AMI. FL 33131 . 51e~OO uSlness 1050 W SUNRISE BLVD· FT·lAUOEROALE. FL 33311-7190 . 764~ . "",rant, .ants BOCA '27-eeoo ' PAL" BEACH 732~ QUALITY BUSINESS FURNISHINGS FAX , (305) 7&1·2132 QUO TAT ION I S ALE S o R D E R .. 831074 PAGE 5 =============================================================================== LINE ORD SHIP MODEL-OESC TYPE UNIT Exn =........--=--......_____...==__=_=_____..___......__._..=c.__.._._._________== 53 5 o KRUYCWAL 163.03 815.15 GR 1 FAB GU£ST CWAIR 54 eTC) TAG: SECRETARY ~I:' 1 o EXCA-005-3066 417.50 4 1 7 . 50 ' _',-I - 30X_~ SP DESK 56 1 o EXCA-009-2445 312.50 312.50' RIGHT HAND RETURN 24X45 SECY RETURN 57 1 o EXCA-014-2066 421.50 421.50' - CRE» W-f(NEEHOLE Set 1 o EXOKD-260-0922 122.50 122.50- - KEYBOARD FOR ABOVE EXEC DESK , 59 1 o HRfCC117 262. os 262.08 ... OR 2 FAB t:· i:.l:ï- ~9UA L~-BACK WORK CHAIR W/O ARMS - eTC) TAGa HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER 61 1 o EXCA-001-3060 497.50 497.50' - 30X60 DP DESK - --. 62 1 o EXCA-014-2066 427.50 427. 50 . - CRED W-KNEEHOLE 63 1 o EXCKD-260-0S22 122.50 122.50 ' - KEYBOARD FOR ABOVE EXEC DESK 302.50 0/ 64 1 o EXC8C-935-1236 302.50 - ____________3~XJ2X4e BOOKCASf; 65 1 (I HRMCC119 303.68 303.68 OR 2 FAB EQUA LOBACK SWVL TILT CHAIR TILT SWVL ~- . - 66 ,-, (I KRLlVCWAL 163.03 326.06 4 GR 1 FAB OUEST CHAIR .- . CONTINUED . . . . . . . . . , I -. r . , t , t I . . 2244 8ISCAYNE avo ........... FL :13137 . 67'~OO U8IneB. 1050 W SUNRISE BLVD· FT ~AUOEAOAlE. Fl333'1-7190 . 7&01-6- . I1VIran.I 16nt:s soc" 427·NOO , PALM BEACH 732~OO OUAUTY .ua'NE.. FURNISHINGS FAX , (305) 7e4-2I32 QUO TAT ION I S ALE S ORDER .. $31074 PAGE 6 ======c=_=_==_=======================================================_========= LINE ORD SHIP MODEL-DESC TYPE UNIT EXn ..........................--------=-.---.--..----------=----------.---------.== 67 eTC) TAO: CONF RM 68 1 o EXCA-484-2424 142.50 142.50 r - 24X24X19 OCCASIONAL TeL ----- 69 1 o EXCTL-401-3672 395.00 395.00' - 36X72 RECT CONF TBL 70 6 o KRlIVCWAL 163.03 978. 18 ~ GR 1 FAB GUEST CHAIR 71 - - - I-¿ eTC) TAG. COMMON RM LUNCHROOM 132 73 3 o HRMET-I09-0L 224.12 672.36 ,/ - 42" DIA TBL 771. 12 ." .. 74 12 o KRUMX-CH 64.26 - LUNCHROOtt CHAIR ----- 75 2 o GHNKPW-46 18.00 156.00Y - 76 4X6 BULLETIN BOARD eTCl TAG: CONF RM (EXISTING SLDG) ...- 77 1 o EGNRW-48 755.00 755.00 - VISUAL BOARD - ----- - 78 2 o GHNI060-60-F 49.00 98.00 ' - EASEL --: 79 - . 80 - - - ---_. -- ---- - -...---. --- -- eTCJ TAG: RECORDS DRAFTING 81 2 o STCK5340 584.55 1169. 10 . - FLAT FILES -- .-- . CONTINUED . . . . . . · - . . , I · , t . l t .. i · I t . 2244 IISCAVNE ..VO, . MINoØ. Ft. 33131 . S1e4tOO U8.neS. IQSOW SUNAISEIlVO. F'lLAUOEAOAlE,Fl33311-1190. 764.. . nvtranment& BOCA .21-t800 . PAlM BEACH 132-6400 QUALITY IUSINESS FURNISHINGS FAX , la) 784·2132 QUO TAT ION I SALES o R D E R .. S31074 PAGE 7 I ========================================-====================-====~============ LINE ORD SHIP MODEl-DESC TYPE UNIT EXT ---.....-------..---..-----...---..........-----=.--------------....-----..-.== 82 83 - - -- 84 - eTC] TAG a MICROFILM 95 - 86 '. 87 . - eTC] TAG a COM'" IMPROVEMENT DIRECTOR~S OFFICE 88 1 o EGNRW-48 755.00 755.00 - VISUAL BOARD ... EW ....< eTC] TAG' INTERVIEW ROOM 90 1 o EXCTl-408-0036 277.50 277.50 - 36" DIA T8l 91 3 o KRUVCWAl 163.03 489.09 OR 1 FA8 GU~ST CHAIR 92 - 93 - , ' , 94 ~ -----.- ------- 95 - - -- -, -- CONT I NUE[I . . . . . . . t . , I -. . r i t " 1 1 .. . . . 22~ 8ISCAYN£ BlVD . ..,....,. FL 33137 . 5741...00 , USln&BS 1050 w SUNRISE 8LVD. . FT,lAUOEfU>AlE. 1'\.33311-7190 . 764~ / . nvlranrnents BOCA 427-9900 . PAl" lEACH 732...00 QUALITY 8UIIHEI. FURNISHINGS FAX. (305) 764·2932 QUO TAT ION I S A L £ S o R D E R .. 531074 PAGE 8 ========================================================================-=-==== LINE ORD SHIP MODEL-DESC TYPE UNIT EXn ...........................-.--.............-........-........:----.--..--..--. 96 .. - 97 ~----- 98 - - 99 ~ 100 --- - -- - . -- 101 ----. 102 - '- .. -:"" - 103 [TC] TAG: ENGINEERING PROJ COO ~ D'N AT oR 104 1 o HRMCC119 303.68 303.68 OR 2 FA8 EQUA LOBACK SWVL TILT CHAIR TILT SWVL --- _.- 10~ ... - . eTCJ TAG: RECEPTION AREA lOb 2 o EXCA-()05-3066 417.50 835.00 - 107 2 30X6~ œSK 312.50 625.00 o EXCA -2445 LEFT RE"TURN 24X45 SECY RETURN - - 108 ...., o EXCA-014-2066 427. 5(1 855.00 ~ - CRED W-KNEEHOlE .-.-.--- - ---.----- 109 2 () EXCKD-260-0822 122.50 245.00 - KEYBOARD FOR AROV~..2 ~~g CONTINUED . . . . . . . ~ , I . , ¡ . I : t ~ ~ I , I ,. . . . 2244 IISCAVNE IIIoVC . M'AMI. Fl33'37 . 57e~oo UBlnoss 1050 W SUNRISE 8lI/D. . FT LAUDERDAlE. Fl 33311,7190 . 764~ . nvlranment:& 90CA 427-9800 ,PAlM 8EACH 132~OO QUALITY BUSINESS FURNISHINGS FAX , I3D5) 784-2132 QUO TAT ION t 8 ALE 8 o R [I E R .. 831074 PAGE 9 '" - ===============--c=============================c==========-=========c==c======= LINE ORD SHIP MODEL-DESC TYPE UNIT EXT/I. ..---..-.-...------...-----...-...-.-..----..------......--..---··.........__c= 110 2 o HRHCC 11 7 262.08 S24. 16 OR 2 FAB EQUA LOW-BACK WORK CHAIR WtO ARMS 111 2 o KRlNCWAL 163.03 326.06 GR 1 FAB GUEST CHAIR --- 112 1 o EXCTL-408-0036 277.50 277.50 - 36" DIA TBL 118 - 114 - ,- eTCJ TAG. CIVIL ENGINEER-UTILITY INSPECTOR 115 2 o EXCA-OOl-3612 ~7. SO 1095.00 - 36X72 DP DESK - -. 116 2 o EXCA-014-2072 440~00 880.00 - I 2OX72 CRED I ..... 117 2 o HRHCC119 303.69 607.36 GR 2 FAB EQUA LOSACK SWVL TILT CHAIR TIL T SWVL 119 -- - eTCJ TAG: INSPECTOR"S 119 1 o EXCA-005-30óó 417.50 417.50 - 30X66 SP DESK - - 120 1 o EXCA-00e-2445 312.50 312.50 RIGHT RETURN 24X45 SECY RETURN 121 1 o EXCA-005-306b 417.50 417.50 - / 3OX6ó SP DESK 312.50 122 1 o EXCA-ooe-2445 312.50 LEFT RETURN 24X45 SECY RETURN - ----- 123 .¡ o HRMCC119 3()3. 68 607.36 ¿. GR 2 FAB EQUA LOBACK SWVL TILT CHAIR Trl T ~WVI CONT I HUED . . . . . . . . . . f ~ . t \ . t , ! t . . 22448tSCAYNE BlVO . IoIIAMI. Fl 33137 . 576~OO UBlnSBB 1050 W SUNRISE BlVO . FT.lAUOEAOAlE. Fl 33311,1190 . 7~~ . nvlranment:s BOCA 427·9900 PAlIol BEACH 732~OO -- QUALITY BUS'NESS FURNISHINGS FAX' (305) 184,2932 QUO TAT r 0 N I S ALE S ORDER .. 831074 PAGE 10 =============================================================================== LINE ORD SHIP MODEL-DESC TYPE UNIT EXTt .-------..-.........-.--.-------.--..---=....-----.--.-..-----.----.---------.= 124 - - eTCJ TAG: TECH II ENG 1 125 2 o EXCA-005-3066 417.50 835.00 - 30X66 SP DESK -- 126 2 o EXCA-OOa-2445 312.50 625.00 RIGHT RETURN 24)(45 SECY RETURN -- f27 1 o E)(CA-OOI-3060 497.50 497.50 - 30)(60 DP DESK 128 3 o HRMCC119 303.68 911 . 04 OR 2 FA8 EQUA L08ACK SWVL TILT CHAIR TILT SWVL 129 [TCJ TAGI CHIEF DESIGN TEAM OFFICE 122 130 1 o EXCA-005-3066 417~'50 417.50 - I 30)(66 SP DESK 312.50 312.50 131 1 o EXCA-OOe-2445 RIGHT RETURN 24)(45 SECY RETURN 132 1 o EXCA-OOl-3060 497.50 497.50 - 30X60 DP DESK 133 2 o HRMCC 119 303.58 607.16 GR 2 FAB EQUA LOBACK SWVL TILT CHAIR TILT SWVL --- --- 134 1 o KRUVCWAL 163.03 163.08 OR 1 FAB GUEST CHA I R ______ __ __. . _.. _. ..~~. . .-.....--. 135 ./ 136 ' - - ---- _._--~- ----.. --- --._---.._-_._~ -.--.-- _._.--~- .- -------- ----- - -. rTCJ TAG: CONF RM 121 137 1 o EXCTL-401-48120 640.00 640.00 - 48X120 RECT TB.L ---------------- ----- - C(INT I NlIED . . . . . . . ( . f . , , . t ~ ~ , ¡ ! " .~ ,\ . . 22.. BlSCAVNE 8I.VO . ""'AUI. FL 33'37 . 576~OO UBlneBB 1050 W SUNRISE 8l\lO . FT ,lAUDERDALE. FL 33311·7190 . 76.: ~,<, . nv.ranment:s .-------.- , PAL" 8EA04 732-6.00 BOCA 427·99(() QUALITY IUSINESS FURNISHINGS FAX. (305) ]64,2!132 G1 U 0 TAT r (I N / S ALE 8 Ü R [I E R . 831074 PAGE 11 =~============================================================================= LINE OR[I SHIP MODEL-DESC TYPE UNIT EXTN =--=============c=_c_===c=====._s==============_____..______=........ac======== 138 e o KRtNCWAl. 163.03 1304.24 OR 1 FA8 OUEST CHAIR ~- ~ --- ~--- -- i :.i9 4 oÏËxc8é-035-1236 302.50 1210.00 - 36X12X4S BOOKCASE - --_._- - -- -_. *-- 140 1 o HAR526 345.00 345.00 - .- 4"X8" WHITEBOARD W WD TRIM - 141 142 ". 143 144 ; 145 '" 146 147 ./ __-""-4 S1I8-~OTAL $56,080.05 TAX 0.00 TOTAL $56,080.05 t . , I . . t i t ~ i . 1 ".