11-20-90 Special/Workshop
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA - CITY COMMISSION
SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING - NOVEMBER 20, 1990 - 6:00 P.M.
COMMISSION CHAMBERS
AGENDA
Please be advised that if a person or persons decides to appeal any
decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter
considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record
of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. The City does not provide or prepare such record.
WORKSHOP AGENDA
1. Capital Budgets and Comprehensive Plan (Planning Director)
2. Water and Sewer Rate Study (Finance Director)
3. Tri Rail/Delray Train Station (Asst. City Manager)
Pursuant to Section 3.07 of the City Charter of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, Mayor Thomas E. Lynch has instructed me to advise you
of a Special Meeting of the City Commission to be held in the
Commission Chambers at 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, November 20, 1990.
This meeting has been called for the purpose of considering the
following:
(1) Ordinance No. 52-90. An Ordinance adopting Amendment 90-1 to the
Comprehensive Plan. Planning and Zoning Board recommends
( approval.
(2) License Agreement - Comcast Cable Television. Consider a request
from Comcast Cable Television to use publicly dedicated rights-of-
way lying within the City limits to provide cable service to
customers outside the City, specifically to the Las Verdes
Subdivision.
(3) Resolution No. 112-90. A resolution opposing an effort by the
Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners to make all County
ordinances relating to environmentally sensitive lands applicable
and enforceable within municipal boundaries.
,
.
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: ALSION MACGREGOR HARTY, CITY CLERK
B~J k ð"'-
~
FROM: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 1990 *** WORK SESSION ***
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS
THE MATTER BEFORE THE COMMISSION:
This work session focuses upon capital improvement programming,
capital needs, revenue sources, and allocation of revenues to
meet needs. It is preparatory to adoption of the 5-Year schedule
of improvements as contained in Comprehensive Plan Amendment
90-I. It is also preparatory to subsequent actions involving:
* Modification of the water and sewer operating budgets;
* Consideration of the water and sewer rates;
* Changes to allocation of funding, amounts, etc. with
respect to specific projects and revenue sources.
Attached is an outline of the order of presentation. Also
attached is the P&Z Staff Report regarding the 5-Year Schedule of
Improvements and a working report which addresses consistency of
the totality of the capital budgets with the Comprehensive Plan.
Attachments:
* Presentation outline
* P&Z Staff Report re 5-Year Schedule
* Working report re capital projects
DJK/#67/CCWS.TXT
-- -
~* ~ * -N-~
· · · · ·~Y'í~~gi~Y'i9t:QQQ~ã'~~:!!~~~P~~:;!~Q~O~¡fi .., .
~
~»ï>a~ ~30 :~~O~~~a~B:=~~ft 9~.:ft~·~o=
¡¡;.¡;. ¡;'a.;" 0 ~___'C"'IIc."~~i3!il:~VlC'Hn~~. BIõVl~!!::::IC-- ~
aa~a~-a - :10:10 >.: -a ~~~~g- : ~ ~~~a:lO
~..3.~-~i~f~~~I~o~8~..a~...3z~.~·l>-~ .
:lCPP ft~~:~ VI a-B-B~·O~ggg~OD· g 3i · :10
i¡¡r~i_D~a'C:I~_'~~~B~~~i:lO"VI~·~~'~1 ~ ~
~ .-"V~';"1I~:IO~~-B =1:0 - :;.""-g- iLt"':: = n. "11
~¡:~t~ aB~lirlt~~~i io~ ~r·le ~_I~: ~~
Ci\ ::. a · I~:aa -e-~~Q ~:. B § ~-
-. a ~ ~ - "'II ã e ~! 12 ~ ·
~ g- 1- ~2a~" a ~ ~ ~ 0 Z~
J ~ o..:~ a B ^ . 0 ~
· .... &'JJ 12:: ="" šc" > - rn "11
~! g i ~ ~~ i :10
:: ~ ~li ~ ~ ,0
. ..... ~~
3 ~ -
~ =- ¡ ~
'C
('n
() §
"3 ~
.... i in i ~äJ
..r n ~ ~~
~ § §§ § § § §§§ ~
~
."
j~i !:t :10
-g. I iJ~~ g !:t i!:t!:t!:tJ!:tjt! !:t~ ~ e
- p~~ $ ~""
~ ~ p $. ... ã
§§§§ § §§§ § §§§ §§§§§ §§ §
~ v
~ I y ~ ~i ~ !:t!t !:t
$
~;;t §
'" § § §§ § §§
0"
e ..
.... ·rY'i~~gY'~rg~QQ~~~C2'~:!!~~p;;!;r>~~¡f~~¡;~I~;à ~
f" ~~ ~ ~! c ~ ~:; 0 ~ i A. 0 ~ 3 ~ ¡; :; =~ B ft ~ ft a 9: " ¡;. ¡; 0:: ~ ~ :. 31. 0 :r.
~ i r r ~. g¡ ;: .. 0 ;; ~ ~ - -; ~ !t It' ~ = f ; g.! ~ ~ ~ [ ~ ;;. ~ ~. ! I~ ¡. · ;; > !. a :rl
u ~~'~~g~~o¡"f~~I~gg8~~~~"'ftf:!!z~f>~~ l~~1 ~
-4- ";; P P > =. ¡; il ¡: S ~:;- i a 3 ;- ~ Q ~ ë; = .. .. '" ¡; 0 ~ .. ~ ; I ;i¡ -!. a· r.o :10 >
t- ~ - - 0 ft _. .. 3 ~ . ... , :10 ft " · -. ~
_i~à<"-"~~'C"d-õ30 ~~. ~VI~"" ~.~ ;.~~ ~ ~ ,
J - ~ :: "11 0 · 2 ~ ~ 3"Q a .. :; - - = "" ~ ~ - ." N .". 2. ~ !1. Õ ic I
. 2. õ Õ :; d. ~. ~ a &. i :10 a 1 ~ å =; ¡; ~ g ¡;1 :;. ~ g. · ë3. ~ g 8 _ : ~ 2. ~ ~ ~
~ ~!. ã;: 19~s~ ':'Q$.~ i ~ !:B~§ =..~ g ~3' ;2~
il -0 ~ _~-e~aN" A.~.... 0 .. ~. _ l
S .õ ~ na2-....ft~- ~o ~,,~ ~ "
· ~ '" ~ ....~. ~ 2 ~ ~ co" > :I: =. ":
- -I ft --... -. - " ° ..0 :10'
· ¡¡ c:o::. "Q~ ~.:I 0
- . DO . I ~ 0-
~::~.. ~ a A ~
· ~ .... a::
¡;. :;. ~ ~
~. ~ I· ~
- i:3 ~;3 'Z
¡ ~:;!
. Q
I rn
I 52
I ~ .....
... ... ... I~ - ~ ii1 ¡;
i~~j~~~~~ J1~~~ii~ -
~ ~ ~ ~ j I J ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ _. ~~ -=-
§~!$§§~§§ ........ ..... . I . P.}!: a· _ ~. :xí
§ §t1§~§§§ § 8~~~~~~§§§§§ I~ ~ ":
;c
~s~ e
~~~ ~
'"
~ ~~~ ~t!~~~ ~ ~~~ ¡~~ :..J
p~ ~;;t $ ~ .~~ :A
." ~ v
§ §§§ §§§§§ § §88 ~§§§ § ~, ~
~
.
~. ¡~ ~ ~~ - ª~~ ~. ~ ~
- ~ .P
§ §s § §§ § ~§§§ § ;
I~~ i t! i~~ I~~
... t
'J' - . ~
.... ....
§ §§§ § § ,~,§ § § '~
-_.- iJ~
.~ ~ . ii""~
§ ~ § I ~.'"
. I I ,...::J
§ § §L__ ~i§ § § ~.",
I -
-r.
( -- <
n _
-..... (TI
i ~ g;? -<
~ ~ :r1
...., 3 =' >
..., ~ CT;- ;0
.. ;-..
" n ~ ~
; no Q..~
..
I .. ;IJ ~- ~
I :r ~ a .. ~
~ I! -
I .. ."
§ ~ r
c: :z:~
. ('"' .-
. L-~ Et -
iõ c::>;g
~ - ::J 0
iï fr Õ <
¡;. ~~ ;. t;J m
;. ... 3::
ë c: ¡::. c:::>~
I ::II -
" (Î\~ Q.. ::J
no
:ï ëï 011 ~
~
0 -rQ 0 .. (,f)
iL a. ., g
" n rr
"" o~ ., ['II
õ õ 0
::! I c 8 S
a ~ "T]
..
:a ::II ~
~ "! .. '~~
..
i ., I C/) "T]
;. C : ...¡ 0
n
" .. l:g -c ;0
a ~
; :;. !;: ~
!:t n ;0
11 § ::J Z 0
~ ~ Ê z '-'
rn
D ~ Z a
¡;. v .. 1>0 C)
., ~ --c
" tt pro
I ~ ~ ~ ~['II V
I:r ~ ..,.
;. ñ § Õ ...
I J:r ~
õõ 0
¡" ... §
n
i' .0 ~
C
~ ~ 8
Q.. §
a ::J
A.
'0 ¡;.
iõ n
a ..
a 0
:ï c ..,.
.. :;. VI
'i ! p
::1. §
~ ,.
I !:t ~
I ~
§ ~
§
en
C::J
8 (,f)
:z ['II
8
z
0
I ~~
NZ
! §ž
C)
-c
rn
;0
Õ
0
ì
~
-
3 3 ZCl)o\:""c:a~~OI""'"':1rr.:t-ia::r-;zczoM"'::I'
o a ~ 0 ., _. - c: AI ., AI 0 ., .... ß 0 ;:c~:;o
>2.-4 - !!.-~ ~.. ~ :::~B.~ 3.g t: ~"'r1::! ~ ;>:0
- - r:r' n - ;J n Q. ~ .,,, n~ 1_· () n ~::r '-
- ::r;¡' è- '< ~ n = -> ::; :I: :J. n ëi: 0. .. ~ -z m
n VI _. ~ . -. n n "'= ., .. n ~
~ ii~i~~~i¡~¡rif~~ i~[ i¡I~~~§;~~i t!~~I~~~
d' ¡;¡ It It It S "" .. ::elt !1 a. ~ f? ft' ~ -z CI ::1 =- VI n.. 0 <' c: ~ m ¡;: a > .. !! _. ~ ., ,..
-. "'0 - ... ::r .. ^ .. n" ¡'¡' - n "':1 '"=1
..i en ã'" f...;t a !!. Ë· a D3 ;p > Q 2. ~! c.. '" Q. ~ .. It., ~ It > è --;?'
g" n t ilea B ~ - a - ... a "'r1 a .. !:. ë3 ~ .. tl E 012 ~
a :a 0 ð m ø ¡;: - ! ~ c .. ~ Q. "jÇ"" ~ ~ 10 .9
:: Ii 1ft. B~ ~..,.., ~ot: n n r
It ~ ." ~ ~ S If > ~ C- ~ iJ ;:; 3 ¡;: ~
[ l c.. 0 s::: ~ ~. ~ : -0'
;. ~ 2..~ ~ ' c::>
· \" .."0"0
= :xJ ""'_
~ ! ~~' 9 ~ I'
i c ..J7 Q.~g'
~ r-.. ;J .,
a- c; ~ -, ¡;" .
I 0 ~-
\s .. :~S(
¡;. ~ ß..ð
I n "'O~E
~ ë3>~
I · _. 3 ::r
.. " -
I " n:;~
I" t:o." "'r1
i ~ 2,,3::\ -
; ¡o It ~ ~ ",,,... ~ il"'! -0 ~
! .. -"C j;,i';'¡- ....¡~-i
, 0 2 ~a ~ aaa. p~-;:
¡. ~ t ~ ~ § § § § § §'¡ ~
~ ~;~ Z
en n -.
i ·"08 Z
~ ::I. · a
~ ª: [ ~ ~ ~ ~81~ ~::g ~
. ., _0 0 m
~ ~ ~ p . . . . ~ :;0
II' , g. ~ ~ § § § §I§[ Õ
8 ~c: v
~ 0 n
ft -.
I "'0 = ~ ~ I",
d. ~ ~ Õ t1 ~ t5
"!. ~;. !3 p . p p ~
i "~ §§ §§ §
_ !. 0
~ =8
! ~ ~! ~ ~ I~ ~
i g §§ §}
I I i
~ ~ ~ I~£ I
¡ ß ~ 8 '.of ~ I
I § § § ¡ §¡ J> !
, IT k
~ j ~ ~
~ . ~
, :10 Z I 1 8
I ~ 0 I ': z
~ a -.." ::;t)1 \J
D ~( j.~~_....
n . ~ 'ß ~ ~
[ ~ ~ ! ~ ":" ~
o ;:¡;t~J 21
~ ~ ~ ?# ~ ~ t:t !:t ~ ." ! ; I § zL
- ¡p~B¡~}sJ:lJS~ß ~ ~ ~ ¡à ~
§ § § § § § § § § § § § ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ I!I ~
§ § § § § § § § § § § § : §~ g.
:IO~"1I~2~~Q~~Y'~O~Z~CO~~~~ ~ O~~ ~ ~ .
fiII~~=0§.,.i3c7~~~~~!.·ëg~:g~ ; a : >e ~
;t1---___ taD-if. ........& a-~-"... a... ~
_~~ ~~....--_~~ "~g~~ a a__ ~
,..... ~oo~w ..........a.. Q"1I ~..,..
~~CCg~DII_h>~i!!..i3~--" :1.¡;.jr'Vli~' e
~.~~~~ft 8~-. :. -. g.~ ~
~!~~¡·~~~i¡img~ !!É¡~-i~~~i3 ~! fill Q
"~Q~~F¡;¡¡i! ~ ~~~!~~grft ~~ ~~ ~ ~
~~~f ~ ~VI~t:~I~s~!!~ ~ ~~~~~~~ Z ~
~g ~a <II VIr i ~ ~~~~j ;:IO~' =-t1- ~ °v~
[ : ~ ~ ¡¡ ¡¡¡ Vi .1 ~! ~ ~ ~ ~;
\1 ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ a i :;..<t ;8
- e ( . 0
il. g ~
fill a YrrJ
- CJ2
~ tiI
en
Q
~
~!:t !:t t! c
~~ ~ ~ ~
§§ § § ~
:10
_ "11
~ ~~ ~ ~ J~ Ë
~~ ~ ~ §~
§~Iiij § § §§ ã
V
~ ~ U ~ U !:te~ j
~ ~, p. ~ ~ ~ ~~g §
§ § _ ã § § ~ § § ~ ._
3 ¡; ~ c 't:: t:: ;; ~ ~ r ~ ~~
~ !;" 1:' I ~ ~ - ~ 1. r I~ · · · · · · · · · . · · j¡1 . ~ ~ < 2 ~ en !It ¿' I-:~ z ~ !It ~ II' C Z [I(' it' r:: Œ š:¡"'¡¡ ~ <:
X" li:~'J ¡O-iõ[Vli:o læo..:.: b5;l~¡;-g¡~~;;~¡:-~~c. g~;o~>fI:~ ~:::~=¡n>rn=-~ ~~~~~'& > r.:
- .. cz. a. ~ .. .. - ... if C <: ~ :r"'l'l - . =; i3'" -::. ft· fill" '" ~ ...¡ Z -f VI Ir v: h ft - ffiIi .... 00(
~ :0 ~ ~ 2 i ft ~ ~ filii;: ~ &. E' ;; ... ;; . ~ ! - g, ! ~ ~ ~ .. t{ g: ~ c :10 ~ ~ ¡¡ VI;J ; :!i! aJ ~ =: =: ¡t: ~ ~. ~ r-:
~ t t 2. :;! Q õ' :11- ~ en'''' S' g a !!..;;t!?. > ~ ~ ~ s § ~ :' ¡r :;; ~ ~ ~. ~ g, . ~ ~ 3 : ¡ ! ¡ ~. : g ~ 2: ~ ~ ž " :10 ~
!/ !! ~ i " II :II ~ 1:::;' ~¡~ ~ ~ :I ~ a ~ ~ ~! ~ ;: ii; : ~ ¥i S. 2. ª. ~ ~ ã' g; ¡ ~ ~ = ~ ir ;;t ~ :¡ ã ~i ~ ~ O. fill ~
"8- g'g'; ,ãª.¡l!~ ~~. ~~å~~!~!t.D~~~fiII~"'. g:~f¡~~¡~ '25c~~~ãOlã'ãi~K ª~I ~ ~~ :J;
. .:f /'4 0 . -. ... - <: ... ùs ùs en ... .. .... :0" t:: VI - -. ... ~ ~ ft " _ -. iI "11 ~ ...,
~B ~ g ä. ~ ~ a :: ~ ši I ~ ùs ~ r ; ~ ~ ÌÌ\ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3: &' ~. i- ~: f. ~ g' Š Ii f-:! ~ g i I ï: i ~
:::0. r- a ~ ¡o- lIT <: h II '" <: ¡;¡¡ ~ c.D ... ~ IP;¡ ft . ~ - 0 a ~ -.
IL ~¡O-1~ ~ ~ iI =.. ~ i ùs ~~ ùs ~ -= [~~"» ~~ '" õ l)........a ~a. c: ~
-. .. fT::I ~ 0 > <: ,." - VI - 0 .. II 0 _ ~ ~ C) ~ ~ ~ 0 z:lO
~ '" ch:ll .... ÙS'" ~ .. h::_.~ Z.. -[1:- - _a 0 0
...., "" '" - ~ -.. :II .. VI ... ;: - _. Qj
_9'" ";z a" n 'z ' _0'" =.;- ~ 0_,. 0 'i ft ~ ii" :0 ~ <
......... 0.. '-' (J') :I""" ,.
~ :; !. ër g Ii a' ¡:.2 :0 _ ~ !:. ~ æ ...., ;: 16 r::
i .. - -- I--:, - -. 0 -\ñ- ~
g c.,,~ n ...! ¡;ï= II=- =- ~ r.:
a > ,-.. ~ '= - .I 2;
! t!::= ;;t ~ ~ ~::A
.. . -i .. 1-. ~
:;, ;. ~ ... ~ ~
a ..... ~~ ~
1 i ~ ì §
. ~..
s ~ I ~ -
8 !:t n ~t:! t! · ~ 8 ~ ~ .... ,.... ~ ~ ~ tt .... ~ ~¡~ n ~ ~ t; !:t tJ ~ .. t! ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~
I ~ fl t ~ fit ø ~?,. :t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ jS ~ ß. ~I~ ~ ~~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~
2. § § ::;: ~ § § ~ $ § S ~ '"f § § § § § § § § § § § § ~ §~ ~ § § § § ~ ~ ~ ~ I;: ~ ~
ã I, ~ I ~ 9-
~. 1 t: n tt ~ '¢ ~ I~ ~ .... .... ~ ' ~!1 :!i ~ ..;
; N ~ j J ~ :!'~ ~ ~ ~: § ~t ~: g - ~ ~ ~ y ! ~ "~J J. } ~ g ~
~ § § § § § § § ~ § ~ ~1 § § ~ § § § ~ v: § ~ § § ~ I~, g ~
i I I l~' .... I it~:.. I
~ t! ~~.. _!1~ [t it:!~ ~_!1 §
~ ~ i-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . I. ~ ~ .~ L~ ~ a . f~
i ~ §~ § ~ §. ~ - § § § Ii, ~ § § I~:§ § § ~ :
l I ...... '~I ~ " ~¡~ ~ ~ '. ìS
:> ,I -;ç. n ;; :... ~ p ." ~'a þ ~ ~
~ t 8 ð'~ - 'f ~ . § · § Q s;( I...
~ §§§~ -=. ~ ~ ~ /5 I~"
¡ .~ 1:!~ I 4 ~t1~ ~ ¡I'f
, ~ ¡-B e N ~ ~ p '. " pia p 2) ¡ b
~ § § ~ f ~ § § ¡ ~ .&¡§ § § I~ ,
~ ~ ~ · :\ I' ,!H
I. I en : I i , 81
-.
"It
-r, <
<: rn
rr. -<
" -< ~
~ ;:0
:c ç:
"r. Ç?
C ~
z~~ =i
o -
o~
-- r
~~
~
::c
0
....o~ i
aæ
z I
~
Q
..... I
~ :t
c §n~
~
"
::c
~
::c
c ' "T
~ I ~ r~~ ~
~
.~ ~-~ '""
§ § ç ã
~ z
§ ¡ z v
0 I~ z :t
J.-j ! r
" _0 ~
.0 ,¡g ~
§ §
§ ï~
,§ ,
! -
I
I
!~
.' i~
I
c.r.
m
8 'f
z .-
0 ~
-~
~ç ,
! I
'2
§~ ' I
: :J)
C) (':1
~ : 8
m '.
:10 Z'
Õ -I.
~ '-J'
0 i~ ~
"^> i
'~ Z I
i Z
Z
, °1
: ~
, (':1
I ;:0
I -
: C
0
,
I
r
j
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
TO: ALSION MACGREGOR HARTY, CITY CLERK
b~:J k ð"'-
~
FROM: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 1990 *** WORK SESSION ***
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS
THE MATTER BEFORE THE COMMISSION:
This work session focuses upon capital improvement programming,
capital needs, revenue sources, and allocation of revenues to
meet needs. It is preparatory to adoption of the 5-Year schedule
of improvements as contained in Comprehensive Plan Amendment
90-I. It is also preparatory to subsequent actions involving:
* Modification of the water and sewer operating budgets;
* Consideration of the water and sewer rates;
* Changes to allocation of funding, amounts, etc. with
respect to specific projects and revenue sources.
Attached is an outline of the order of presentation. Also
attached is the P&Z Staff Report regarding the 5-Year Schedule of
Improvements and a working report which addresses consistency of
the totality of the capital budgets with the Comprehensive Plan.
Attachments:
* Presentation outline
* P&Z Staff Report re 5-Year Schedule
* Working report re capital projects
DJK/#67/CCWS.TXT
(,J/~/ 1
REVISED AS OF NOVEMBER 13, 1990 2:00 PM
PROPOSED PRESENTATION OUTLINE FOR CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION OF
NOVEMBER 20, 1990
I. OVERVIEW OF MEETING David Harden
II. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMMING
A. The Five Year C.I.P. David Kovacs
B. FY 90/91 Capital Budgets David Kovacs
(project compliance focus)
C. Review of Revenue Sources Joe Safford
D. Administration Proposals David Harden
III. WATER AND SEWER CAPITAL PROGRAMMING
A. Water and Sewer Facility Needs William Greenwood
1- Major, one time, capital projects
2. Remedial, major repair and upgrade projects
3. Remedial, ongoing
B. Review of Water and Sewer Resources Joe Safford
C. Administration Proposals David Harden
IV. WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY
A. Overview and recommendations Joe Safford
V. DISCUSSIONS
A. Focus on Administration Proposals
B. Next Actions:
1- Adoption of revised 5-yr CIP 11/20
2. Determination of Capital Budget Consistency 11/27
3. Funding Program Modifications 11/27
(implementation of Administration proposals)
4. Adoption of amended water and sewer 11/27
operating budget or 12/04
5. 1st Reading of W/S Rate Ordinance 11/27
6. Public Hearing and 2nd Reading 12/04
or 12/11
VI. ADJOURN to the Special Meeting
DJK/#73/CIPOUT.TXT
·
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ~IEMORJ\NDUM STAFF REPORT W
MEETING OF: " NOVEMBER 19, 1990
AGENDA ITEM: V.F. Consistency Determination Regarding the
Proposed Revisions to the Five-Year CIP
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD:
The item before the Board is that of a final review and
recommendation to the City Commission regarding the
compliance/consistency of the 5-Yr C.I.P. with the
Comprehensive Plan.
BACKGROUND:
This item should have been before the Board when you considered
the "Response to ORC Report". However, more work needed to be
done and, at that time, we reported the 5-Yr CIP would be late.
For comparison purposes we have attached:
* The 5-yr schedule as contained in proposed Amendment
90-1 as it was transmitted to D.C.A. in June; and,
'* The proposed 5-yr schedule.
The proposed 5-yr schedule reflects the reprioritization of
Decade of Excellence projects so they conform with the first Bond
Issue; reflects the water and sewer revenue bond proposal;
accommodates all projected funding for the Parks Impact Fee; and
acknowledges that revenue from the new Storm Drainage Fees will
be allocated to new projects instead of repayment of the GO Bond.
In short, there is much more money allocated in the revised
schedule. The following which is for FY 90/91 is indicative of
this change.
Funding Source Initial eIP Amend 90-1 Proposed
General Fund $ 550,000 550,000 1,100,000
G.O. Bond 5,077,400 5,945,000 8,353,977
Parks Impact 100,000 100,000 300,000
Drainage -0- -0- 750,000
Water & Sewer 2,483,000 14,677,220 16,235,523
The background information which is provided with the following
agenda item will give you a better understanding of the projects.
I
,
P&Z Staff Report .
Consistency Determination Regarding the Proposed Revisions to
the Five-Year CIP
Page 2
ANALYSIS:
Each of the projects listed in the 5-yr schedule meet needs as
identified in the Comprehensive Plan or its supporting
documentation. Board members should review the policies A-3.1
and A-3.2 of the Capital Improvement Element (copy attached) which
sets forth the annual review requirement and criteria for
accommodating changes.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, find that the proposed revised 5-Year Capital
Improvement Program Schedule is consistent with the Capital
Improvement Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Attachments:
'/( Pages III-H-18 & 19 of the Comprehensive Plan
'/( 5-yr sked per 90-1
'/( 5-yr sked as proposed
DJK/#67/PZFIVE.TXT
I
.
1< $50,000 within the Water and Sewer Capital Fund for the
Fire Hydrant Replacement and Installation Program
pursuant to Policies C-4.1a and C-2. 5 of the Public
Facilities Element.
.
1< $50,000 to come from General Tax Pevenues commencing in
FY 95/96 for continuation of the scenic streets and
beautification programs. (Open Space B-1.2, Coastal
B-3.2, Traffic B-3.2).
Objective "-3:
The City of Delray Beach shall establish programs and
procedures which require the provision of needed and desired
improvements, as identified in other elements, and which
shall manage the land development process so that needs
created by future development will not exceed the ability of
the City to meet them. Such programs and procedures shall,
at a minimum, include the following policies and activities.
(b5 )
Policy A- 3.1 The C.i ty of Delray Beach hereby adopts the
list of capital projects contained in the five year schedule
contained in Part IV.B. and establishes that all projects
identified as a mandatory need in the Inventory of this
Element shall be carried out in accordance with that
schedule. All other projects shall be carried out as
scheduled or within one year thereof. It is the
responsibility of the Local Planning Agency to review the
five year schedule each year and to prepare the five year
schedule for the second planning period so that it will be
adopted as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan in June,
1993. ·
Policy A-3.2 The criteria which shall be considered in the
amenciment and modification of the 5-year schedule and the ·
preparation of a 5-year schedule for the second planning
period shall include the following (cl): ·
activities ·
a) The highest priority shall be afforded to
and projects which eliminate a public hazard whether it I
be to health or the reduction of damage potential.
(cla) ·
-
b) The second highest priority shall be given to ·
activities and projects which eliminate less than ·
desirable conditions or provide services to unserved,
inhabited areas. (c1b) "
c) Consideration shall be given to impacts upon the ·
availability of funds for the project and for other
projects; when appropriate for the purpose of providing ·
financial resources for other needs, an activity or
project shall be phased over a period of time. (c1c)
III-H-18
·
d) When a project can be combined with another project in
the sam~ geographic area, it shall receive a higher
priority e.g. combining needed street improvements with
scheduled water and sewer improvements may accelerate
the street improvement project. (cld)
e) When a project will receive significant funding
assistance from a development project or through
neighborhood contributions through an assessment
district or other method, it shall be accelerated on
the schedule. (cld , e)
f) When a project can be funded through an exclusive
funding source, it shall have a priority determined
through that funding source regardless of its
relationship to projects which are funded by other
funding sources e.g. a park constructed with dedicated
park funding can have a higher priority than a
mandatory need when the financing for the need isn't
available. (elf)
g) A project's priority shall increase if it can be tied
to the construction of a project undertaken by another
unit of government e.g. water main upgrading and
hydrant placements shall be coordinated with street
improvements which are constructed by Palm Beach
County. (clg)
h) A project's scheduling shall be consistent with respect
to other projects which have been prioritized within
other elements of this Plan, except as they may be
modified through the criteria contained within this
Policy A-3.2.
Policy 1\-3.3 Each department of the City's administrative
structure through which capital needs are addressed shall
maintain a Capital Improvement Program (ClP). The CIP shall
address currently funded projects, projects under
construction, and a five year projection of projects. The
ClP shall include all projects contained on the five year
schedule of this Element and shall contain those projects of
greater than $ 25,000 which are funded through the dedicated
financial resources for remedial projects (Policy 1\-2.3) and
all other projects of greater than $25,000 which are
proposed. The ClP for each department shall be reviewed
annually by the Local Planning Agency which shall issue a
statement of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy A-3.4 The Administration (City Manager) shall
prepare a Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) for each budget
year. The CIB shall be reviewed by the Local Planning
Agency and must be determined to be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan prior to its consideration the City
Commission. (c7)
III-H-19
I
- .
- -S -t
-..... j :. P x
, . "
J () ~ s!.
'1 UJ ~ ði §
t·
ã ¿ .1!, I
.If - ')
" ;11 ~~
<J tJ.-:s'
§ § i
i
¡¡;
,
'. f §§ I §
-- ~
"
II Ii §§ I I
If
¡¡;"
~ §§§ ~~ I I~ § § . I
~~ ~ ã
"" a
" "
^
~ ~ Ii ~~I~li¡~1 ~ III I I~II §
J
a ~ "" A" ¡¡;"¡¡; ¡¡; ~ "
a:
~
~ I » I §§ §
¡¡.
~ Øã I
~
~
i ....
1 -= I
ì '"' JJ.
I C ~ ~ ~
· ð ~- ~ ilii i ~
~ it - < s,[~ 5 = t I l ê:- i·"
.¡ o 'C JS '"' ....." s~
~ : Si·~ 'I.~!j ]~j II~~ (JII11, 'I~=~~
a: ~ ~j;~~ ~~;;~!~~~iil~~!!;;~t~t~~~;~~~
ð
~ ! !~!1J~j~~~!!!~~~~ðJß!iJ¡JJl!!8~jiiii¡
M~a:~i~~1 . Ð~~~t~£e] .~l~_MW~E J~~~.~~
~ iO~~~! ~~d !!!æ=IS.~C~C ~~ c~~ ~a<!«~
j~~Ö<Õ~~~zdð~~~~~£~ðõð~B!~~jB~z ~Æ.....
. ¡¡:
- -- ....- ~ - -- - - - - - -
I
, ,-
I
, f §§§§§§§§§§§§
.
, ~gäfäl!U~~!-
.
; ¡;¡ ¡;¡;;
~ § i
¡it
"&
'C
X-
..
c
'ã i
c
..
ã. -
." .!!
IS
'. I ')
u
~ ã.
.! I
! .I ,
" s
.
I ..
!
u
§ of! 'C
.! .c-
8 ~ B
.. fn
¡it 0. r.
~ ..
a a
u '!
i of! c
8 I!
a 0
..
a rñ
I: ..
S .!
.. J
u
'2
0 u
.! of!
." J
c
.:!
.~ i
of!
.!
u j
~ ]
II < ~ L ! J i
I
g
.. ¡¡. ..; 8 1 =
¡¡ ~~~~si]iiill!!1~ ~
J:
..
..
." U ð .. '1 1::J: ~ = :i .¡ ~ .!!
c
.. jD...gIlo1.a.:!j~.aa:e ~
II-
...... æ ~~ozllo~ð~~~¡jð =
-
...., ....,
- ~ ... .... - - - ... - - -
...
... .'-.
i
1
i
I 0 § §§§
I Q ~~~
,~ ~""
~ ~~
~ . "
Q.~
o
Z
~
(I)
i ~ !I § I
~ ~ § ~
s: ã s
~ a I ~ ~ ~ ~
. ~ ""
~ ~ § § §
i ~ Ii! ä ~ ~
" "
^ z
" ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ã~!§
~ r-~ "g ¡; U ~~~"
Q. -
cr:
~ § § §§
5 t¡ Sf ~a
ß Q ¡; ¡;
~
~ ~
~ a OW
g .- ~
.- . ðì
o ¡-
~ ! ! ~J~ f!! ~ ~
t~ II. II! ~ ~ .. õ
~ ~ aM ~f/!II!~ J J e ~ ~ :
~ o.§s~!_~. 1~~~~M!f/!~lI!a~ ~ 8~!~
~~s 0·0 - ~u w S ~~~ ~ ? 'z: m-~
g ~11!~i~l~ft¡1jtii!il!~I~~i~l~tte
~ cr:-c e ~j~~J;~~~J_~~ £ O~ucr:~
~ II :s'¡W_ Ð e .:s " -e. :S=-cr:
~ ~< ii~ þ ~~l~ o~~3ð3~1!¡j~~jl~~
_ "_ ~ _ flow _ _ .... _...... _ _ _
I
.
§ ,
ã! I
~ I
o I
z~·
- I .
Z I
Z "
:5'"
~~I
0 ,
Z !
~ ,
t
In
!
I
I
~!
T
~I
~I
I
i
"
i ~:
10
º §
§ ,ct .
u.J ~' Ö
g ~~I ~
¡Ii
^ z ;
~ z §
:5 §
~- ~ ~
~ ~~ ¡;;
Co -
~ u..
I §§§
~ ~
8 ãå~
u: ¡Ii
a
'" i
~
z
a.: I
~ I
I ~
¡ r: u..
ct I·g t g
Q., Ie = 'J:
~ ,- "
.s~"O
..J u .s ~
~ °1'Š g ~
ë: z r: 'J: ~
ð ::) U =t "
~: e ..c $
. u 'C
a: ~: CIO ....
~ ~I~ ~]
>-
UJ ll,""" ~
~ g 8·ë ~
u.. Q., ~O
I
~
ý
(1.
I ~ iU
(S g¡ g~~
A- II ~j iI" Q I
(/ ~~ ,
I 8 i
u:
en
,j ~ê ~~§Si, § ~ §.
¡ a:~1 â ~ ã j ~ J ~
i r I : ;; ¡;;
.. ~ I ¡ ..
: ~¡ § § §ial § § § § § §
~I ã ~ ã I ; i ~ å i ~
~ ~
~§ §§§Si § §§ § §§ §
§ ~ ~ ~ ã ~ ã i~ ¡ ~ ~ å Î ' å
~ 10
~ Q ~§ §§§Si ~~§ § §§§§§ §§§ §
~ ~§F' s g~g ~å~ 8 ~~~~2 8g~ ~
U o~ "R ~~~;; MM"~U """ ~
~ Z MMM
a z .
~ ~ i§§§§ª§~~§~S~~ § §§§~§E§ §§~§§;i§§ §
~ ,Q.. - g ~ ~ . I· r-: .... r-: d ~..; 0< ~ t
i i~~....ã~ã~§«æf~~ I ~ããaä~U ããafä~5..ã ã
c
t1J I
Õ
en .....¡
~ v ,
Z ~!~ ~ ~
t1J v ~ = -; ~
~ 5,- 1 ¡¡ ~
.. E..... ...."
0" a - aD.-~
o ~ ~ ~.....~ oat·'; -
COW U va. '::0""
,0: 0 v...... .... .- .. v ._ .... 'õ:
Q.. .- :z: ~ < c· .. .. e ~ . __ at'''
~ ¡~ 0 ~ ~~ ~--~""''õ:ee~ ~ ~~ e
'E .- 2 § - - ~ aM S"8 c - a. ~ a .- I!
~ C~ = ~ .g ~ = .I ~ -;- j :; ~ Ë ~ -= ð -; ~ B § ¡; .2.i .2 i ! ~ .š
~ ~.~~';.:~ g]¡ ·e··g~:i ¡¡: ð'û'¡':;'¡¡s~~~!~£~c~'e=~,g~'õ
~ coo w....MD.-~_V~ = _.....a.a. a" .. "Q..a ._
~ ~~~~,,~ ~.D.."~en,~, ~ Õ~O"0EB~-e~~'õ:~a-.J~~o~
'"' ~ - I! .;¡ 't: a ... 0,," ... aJ " en B l' § a. D ~ a " .- u 0 < ..:. ..:. .... w
~ 'ë .; · - .. ~ · ëi 0 ~ c c a = - :g 0 D. - E ~ ...... en t" c e ~ .= .s.s ...
~ t)' u :f~-: ~¡:lã<·8ðZg¡¡:.g-8.gD. ~.~._.. 8-qð~ ~~- ~1~CriS:J g.=.=~.~
u.: t:J, :; < ~ " r: f-o " .~ ~ - :! :! :! l:' a u.. ~ CI ~ U - ~ < - lIS < ~ 0 a - 5 ã a CI o¡ c
> ~ - ._~ -~.~ ~~~~~~ve~. ~ ~ - ]~_._~~~~
::) a¡ , E -: ~ E- ;: c ! :: " g d § u u " ø..~·: ~ ~ c § C"V E:i c t:i w· ~ < < ~ <
~ g:'y,:,!ð ~ b; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡f ~ 0 ð ïE ¡f æ a::J:i ~ ~ õ ð ð eL~'~ Cld9 ð; :i CIS ¡. · · · ·
...
- - - -
1
§ §: § § § § § § § § § § § §
~ ~ ~g~ gg~8~g~8g
æ ~. ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~
o . \lOt ... \lOt ...
Z Qr~1
- ~ -I
Z N,ciJ,
Z , VI
:s~~
c.. _ >1
C~I
Z " I
8 ! :
~ ,!
cr. ;!
ì I
v-J~ § §.
~!I~ 8~
~f ~a
'I I
§ §§ g
t~ 8~ v~
~~ ~~ ti
~~
~~ ~~ §~ :~
C'O os;c dg -!to.
~ ~ ~ \l5 ~ ~ ¡ "e '
~ ~ ... =e..
,,-
C v °
::I C
QI§ I § § § § a g .g
~ ~I . . . " ~ t I:!
~ 0 0 ~ ~ ._
~_~8 ~~ ~~
~~~~ ~~ wo
Z "'C
_ Be.."
Z .- v
-v-
Z ,§§§§§ §a ~~~
:s .!d"d º "',,
~~~ ~8o .. ~~!
~~k ...~~ E~~
- ceo
~ V"'='n
oS ~ U
A e·!l..
.~ < e
~ C e..
- ~ftV
I -N
Q., ..
~ CI .5
.. - e
.81;f"'='
6 v ~
V'- °
_0....
Ie.... ..
foI e.. ~
; ~ t ~
~ ~ Ñ' ]1!Q.
:J ü ':: ~c~
,C 0 >.. ...!to."'=' tJ .... ::I
Z ; ~ _ ~ e .; .. n u..
';:?'~" A <~..:! ~ "'=' :! "'=' ~::t Õ
- ~ QQ ft e.., v .. v " !it v v ~ A
~~<cæ~ e.. _~~w~g~~~~~ ~tg
o _ ~ _ ~ _ t! a Q ° ..! .- c:r O'D
~~..Oft<Vft~- ~,,~c:rCVAcXB ::IZg
U'V-,,"ftVQ.,~C vvv"c:rCV) E ....
tIJ ~ ~ :; ~ :s! U.. u ~ .Cl 'C ::c :: f- = ..! ii: >.. -<~ .~ ~ _
..., ~ A ~ V .- Ú U v .... ~ v v I! - u ,c""""::
c; t:: c u.. ~ ::z go e "" ] ~::: ~ ~ :; C - ...... t- õ ~
a: I 0 V ." ft ~ 0" I'f::l - .- .. Q v a 0
c..CZOZ-J:D!-:I::LIrt..J~èi5~CD..JC~Z ~ N
...... ......
.,
, ':
J
.
c I ! §§
Q I I 'irJ.
cr: ' II
: :.:.: f ... -
0.. I I ...
~ ~!¡ I " ¡ 1
I~ . i ;
~ Š·· I
15: _t. I I
0,", F. ,
_I
,Z ~ ,
~8 ~ ¡ !
It:; ~ ¡
en j
: !
.~ ~ §§ :ql ~ § §§
r ~ .
i~ ~ vi vi ~ .
~ """ ..å
a ~ ¡:¡
I ~ Ii -§ ~ ~ I !
~ lã ~ ~
vi
""" ~
51 t;(
t :¡ ; .
~i § §§ ~! §§~§ § §§§
! g g c"1 ":Ñ~i ~ ~š~
~ a¡:¡¡; ~ ¡Hi
¡; ¡; -'
, ;...:
§ 0
0 ~ § §§§~ ~ § r;~§~~§~ ~ §§§
~ ffi~ { ~ii ¢ ig~
¡¡¡ ~ö: ~ ~ ~i~-~~- I ¡:¡¡:¡
^ ¡; - ¡¡¡¡;¡;¡;
6 z ¡;
Ž
t:l ~ I~ ~~E~§§§§ J:: §c;§§ §§§§§§§§§§ ~ §§
a Il'. i
cr: ~~ ... åá¡ã~ããã ~âãl! tãrisf~it~i¡ ~ã
0- ~
cr: ~ ¡;~. .~... ¡:¡
2 ¡¡¡ ... - ;;~
to. ...
,", J
::¡
:;j
ß i
a -""
en a
~ 'û' .:
z ~ .... ~
... ~II :!a _
::J c 13 c 0 ._ .- a ';
¿ ~ {!. ~.;¡ ~:.. ~
::J aJ ..
u .. .... (/) .....00.. 0 0- 0
:> (/) ~.. ~ CL ~.. c.J- c._ _ ':;
~ 0 II .¡ - = :1J 'ª$ 1:z (/).!!..ë: 3 : .. ~~
z .2 ~ t ~ I ~ ..~ ~."~ fI'I B u
0.. or..... ~~:~.:: i s
, ~ ~ i. C-",,_O ~~ ~~!! ~
~ .2 ï I:: ~ ; ;j ...~ ".0"" :J..... J
~ ~ r"I .J! . ... ~ ¡¡ ¡¡ ! ~·¡.JB Š~ t ... ~~_o rt!
II 0_" ~ ~~1:·3::J..:;ïi~~~;g ~! Ð;t(!~_:St3t(!t(!!~
f~ a ~ v
;: ~; - la .. ~ .. (/) 0 ,2 m .. ... :E -:: .::! .. '';: ... ~~~~ .@>-~~ l' v~
ð w IE:: :!il! -e-J~.2 0 2......~aJ- aolO ~;¡~~
(/) .. ~i!~~~~~i1~~
== .... e: ~ .iI ~ :~ r.e¡a ~.§ I! >1:-~::~ .:: v
IllS ~o .- (/) - ... < 2· ,- C' .- W
cr: ~:g:gO-ð-·S 11-: I! ~::J'::::"" ~ _ea.~ "a~
~ ct . z v..r. ·0" ~ .. 0 :J·c,,-.... .. ~
" C I:: I:: .. m ..! 'C a C"_V(/) ::J--ðq~Aocr.A : i:s! :'1: r: 0 ': :J: :: .g a:
¡.:J ;BCJ :t!==" ea.~1! VI I!....cnct .. .: c"~o ~ ~ I!!CLv!êi~-S~u~a:,:
>- .... _~~:n]Acn"" Z ... t .c ~ 1 IllS ~ :! ~ -= - .. t _ .: .g _ .
t:l < -&, ~ 1:: .:: aJ g aJ - t: .,- ".0 I < a 0 _ - C CI - Ü v ... u ..... .. I! j
~ ~ :~r~ :ïJ::JaJJ, :i:.:J~ '= 0 ~i~I" .. w .!! è3 v v 0 ð v . ~ z j 0 ct !Ii JU~i.~ 0 CD
~ .- ~:Ez _:Eea.!Ii:t!ea. :>~:E ~ w ............
- ... - - -
I
...
'0 !
0 ,
ã2 j
;:J
c..
0 " I
~~. ~
z. .
:s or, CI.~
CI.~
0 I
z I z
~
I
en en
~ ~§§§ ~
~ ~ ~
Ñ ã!ãá
-.
1M
I:: ~§§§ i~ ~§ §
~ QO
~ iã~~ I -- g
~ ~ 0 ~g
tit "M ..
1M .~ g M
F
; ¡":J
~ §§~§§§ a ~ g §
~ -. a=
- ããgiã~ v .. I
.... > v
. ';t=
I~ ó! ~ .c .
§ - a §
c- §§~§§§§ § ~~ a 0 §
.- ':J
..... oS a
g - 8
~ å!âäãíi ~ .- v i
M ~... or. ria ,. t M
c.._ ~ ~ .î~
^ 00- ^
~ z 6
z ~~
~ c- §§s~§§ ª ~§§ 'õá3 :.rJ
~ I:; a
~~ j, !iri=~g,â ~ . . 1~
MQQ a:
Co. orL 'C a CI.
:c: M QQ.. M M ~..
~ e :í a:
0 f2
:... :... S a
U1 .. c ~
~ .- "i-
S E:¡: :J
0 ,...., ~ Sa .; ß
w - ~ ..
a ¡ ...J ...., e¡¡:~ ~
~ e ~ CI...r"
,...., ~ ~ a &.
en "'B
~ êl: v v § ~
:::I ð e B e
a vxg
~ .= Cj'CI. ~ >- c: Z ..
a ....,.. - en g ~ø.M :1.1 r:
~ \3 ~ o ~:¡ ~ a ~ 0
~ .¡ ~ DoV .¡;;
t:: Z, u û' 0 e C .!a::a ..
> ...., l ~"...._~ ~ > . a
en - .. .. .o~
0 0 ~,.v .0 ~t!13 .!! ~-s 0 o .
a:: z '~i ~ :::I "8~H a:: 0;2Z
CI. :J tlJ Do :! e en ~;.:: CI. e~·
~ :.:. 0.. :J :: c.- e g 'û "E ð'- 9..-; ~ o ,¡, .!I
.. . c:
..J a:: Oot¡J:ë:J-¡,a~ ~.. ~ a:: ~.- ..J C = e
8 .. .. .- 0 ~~~ e ~ ~u
~ t.:J a:: .c c: 11 .-_ ~ ~;o
~ I t.:J"vvaecv « 0 0 u ¡51. a eX e
~ ~ ëta:: E v 0. ~ B !'- .- i ;f ~. êl:
t.:J t.:J ~.~ 8 a:: r: a.!! ~ .... en>:sf v .
;C; VI en . ~.¡ e .2 ð ~ O~~~ - 0. ð :L. a~:o
'J ~ I~ ~>-S1l ~ f.:;
a:: ot¡J~¡j~~'i!aa tlJ..a::a:: " a ~ a ~ .c..-
~ ~ a:: ..a ~ t ·8 ·8 ~8;;" ~ .2 a ;Q :: 0" 8
~va::~enð.!!:! tlJ~~5;X
;.. I a:: .c::" en VI a:¡:o ~ v ';.- 8 ;..
;¡¡ < <:;j:¡ 8.~-.::-= ~c.v-;; ~l:§ð :.rJ a a.. ~
~ 8e~....
> ~~rJi!it~~::J::J ð~j ..--~..-. > g:oð~õ
;:¡: :::. u ¡¡:
-
... - - - - -
;
0
" 0
ffi
11.
~~
~.
Q.~
0
z
8
aJ
c:I1
§
~
;;
i oJ
~ I
¿;:
-
:I
s: i
v
oS
§ .!!
"
g ~
... ";
.... tr
~ ~
0 ~
0 ~ "3
...
.... ~~ :¡¡
^ 8 ¡
6 t;; oW
11. ... I w
00- ·
¡?; Q.
t1J t
a z
Z a
ct i ...1 v
11. -=
ct (1\1 Ü
0 ~~i :I
t.:.. t:
~ ..
G: a
.... S
:J
0 g
t1J ..
~ .e v
"2
... 0
~ 11. ..!!
f:I
z ·Ë "
t1J a
.. :I
:E S ....
t1J ..
'> .9 :§
0 .!!
ct 8
11. -
:E CI ·
.. -;
- ..
..J .c ;1
~
· e
ë: -11.
ð .-g
~ a
ct -:;;
< ""=' S
t1J Æ8
>-
t1J --
'> ä.
;¡
J
*** REVISION OF NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ***
THIS DRAFT REPORT IS STILL A WORKING DOCUMENT TO BE USED BY THE
CAPITAL PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE (CIE A-S.1) IN ANALYZING THE FY
90/91 FIVE YEAR CIP AND DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL BUDGETS WITH RESPECT
TO THE COMPREHENS IVE PLAN. THIS DRAFT SHOULD BE UPDATED/REVISED
PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 14TH AND THEN PLACED BEFORE THE PLANNING AND
ZONING BOARD ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19TH; THEN CONSIDERED BY THE
CITY COMMISSION WHEN THEY ACT ON PLAN AMENDMENT 90-1 ON NOVEMBER
20TH.
*** DETERMINATION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAK ***
.MID CAPITAL BUOOE'l' CONSISTENCY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - LISTING BY TYPE OF ACTIVITY
THE FOLLOWING PRESENTS, BY TYPE OF ACTIVITY, A LISTING OF
ALL PROJECTS INCLUDED WITH THE FY 90/91 BUDGET ALONG WITH A
DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
(INCLUDING AMENDMENT 90-1)
IF A PROJECT IS ALREADY LISTED IN THE FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (PART IV) IT IS AUTOMATICALLY DEEMED
CONSISTENT. ADJUSTMENTS RELATIVE TO COST OF THE PROJECT OR
RESCHEDULING OF EXPENDITURES DO NOT AFFECT CONSISTENCY
UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED. THE NEED FOR SUCH ADJUSTMENTS TO
THE FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE IS IDENTIFIED AS CIP/A. OTHER
ABBREVIATIONS INCLUDE:
Funding Source:
DOE = DECADE OF EXCELLENCE G.O. BOND PROGRAM (REF 1989)
GF-STL = GENERAL FUND, 1989 SHORT TERM LOAN FINANCING
SWUTIL = STORM WATER UTILITY FUND (ESTABLISHED 1990)
UTAX = 1985 UTILITY TAX REVENUE BOND
RIF = COUNTY ROAD IMPACT FEE
PIF = PARKS IMPACT FEE
BREST = BEACH RESTORATION FUND
E CONT = EROSION CONTROL FUND
UOP = UTILITIES OPERATING FUNDS
UDEP = UTILITIES DEPRECIATION FUND (RENEWAL/REPLACEMENT)
83RB = 1983 UTILITIES REVENUE BOND
84RB = 1984 UTILITIES REVENUE BOND
91RB = 1991 UTILITIES REVENUE BOND
TFEE = WATER TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE FEE
GF = GENERAL FUND
GRANT = GRANTS FROM OUTSIDE THE CITY
PVT = PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS TO A PROJECT/ACTIVITY
Comprehensive Plan Compliance:
PAP = Previously Approved Project (vested activity)
IŒW = New project which needs a project description
. and possibly prioritization before a
consistency determination can be made.
XXX A-2.2 = identifies Element from the Plan and Policy #
--(E)-- = Equipment Items do not need compliance
determine
PROJECT AMOUNT FY 90/91 SOURCE COMP PLAN COMP
D R A I NAG E
S.E. 1st st. (CBD) 200,000 200,000 DOE 5-yr CIP
Northwest Area 2,050,000 1,293,000 DOE 5-yr CIP/A
750,000 SWUTIL --------
Lowson by E-4 Canal 200,000 200,000 DOE 5-yr CIP
Tropic Isle 249,999 16,429 UTAX PAP
Rainbow Homes 110,067 87,961 UTAX PAP
Bass Creek 150,000 FY 91/92 SWUTIL 5-yr CIP/A
Tropic Palms 250,000 FY 91/92 SWUTIL 5-yr CIP/A
Homewood 30,000 FY 92/93 SWUTIL IŒW
East Central Area 2,060,000 FY 92/93+ SWUTIL 5-yr CIP/A
(NOTE: Because of a determination that SWUTIL funds cannot
repay DOE expenses, SWUTIL projects previously listed in the
5-yr schedule are accelerated to when funds are available. It
will be necessary to establish a priority for projects which
are to be undertaken in FY 92/93 and beyond. This item should
be addressed in Plan Amendment 91-1.)
PROJECT AMOUNT FY 90/91 SOURCE COMP PLAN COMP
S T R E E T, ALL E Y, & SID E W A L K S
1987 St. Beaut. 2,967,452 1,379,403 UTAX PAP
E. Atlantic Ph. II 830,010 96,812 GF-STL PAP CIP/A
Swinton Beaut. 500,000 500,000 DOE 5 yr CIP
Atlantic to 1-95 200,000 FY 91/92 DOE 5 yr CIP
Atlantic to M.T. 238,000 FY 92/93 DOE 5 yr CIP
Atlantic E of IC 1,000,000 FY 93/95 DOE 5 yr CIP
Barwick Beaut. 57,000 FY 93/95 DOE 5 yr CIP
Gen. Alley & Inter 300,000 50,000 GF CIE A-2.3
TRF B-2.1
Alley Improvements 1,000,000 250,000 DOE 5 yr CIP
Power Pole Relocate 75,000 25,000+ GF TRF C-2.2
Walk SW 4th Ave. 80,000 80,000 DOE 5 yr CIP
Walk FEC @ 8th St. 40,000 40,000 DOE 5 yr CIP
Walk Pompey Area 20,000 20,000 DOE 5 yr CIP
- 2 -
Street Resurfacing 1,500,000 250,000 GF CIE A-2.3
Ext. of NW 10th Ave 500,000 500,000 DOE 5 yr CIP
Previously identified a "Spady Improvements" LUE D-2.4
Reconst. Streets 3,872,000 774,000+ DOE 5 yr CIP
SW 10th widening 2,000,000 FY 92/95 DOE 5 yr CIP/A
Del Ida Trf. Circle 35,000 ----- --- NEW
PROJECT AMOUNT FY 90/91 SOURCE COMP PLAN COMP
PAR K S & R E C REA T ION F A C I LIT I E S
Computer Irrigate 250,000 50,000+ GF 5 yr CIP/A
Currie Commons 230,000 20,000+ DOE 5 yr CIP/A
Ballfield Lighting 200,000 200,000 DOE 5 yr CIP
Miller Park South 375,000 200,000+ DOE 5 yr CIP/A
Veterans Park 716,000 250,000+ DOE 5 yr CIP/A
158,000 GRANT-FIND
58,000 PIF
Pompey Park 110,000 110,000 DOE 5 yr CIP
Community Center 190,000 FY 92/93 DOE 5 yr CIP
Scrub Park Dev. 120,000 FY 93/95 PIF 5 yr CIP/A
Southwest Park 800,000 FY 93/95 PIF 5 yr CIP
Equip. & New Improvements to existing parks CIE A-2.3 &
500,000 42,000 PIF PRE A-2.3
PROJECT AMOUNT FY 90/91 SOURCE CaMP PLAN COMP
B U I L DIN G S & F A C I LIT I E S
Old School Square Project - Total remaining cost $ 4,788,615
Phase II 1,453,615 FY 90/91 DOE 5-yr CIP/A
359,000 FY 90/91 GRANT
1925 Interiors 378,000 FY 90/91 DOE
800,000 FY 91/92 PVT
Phase III (Thtre)300,000 FY 92/93 GRANTS
500,000 FY 92/93 PVT
Phase IV
(Facade) 1,000,000 FY 93/94 PVT
Renov F.S.& Equip. 1,516,000 1,046,000 DOE 5 yr CIP/A
F.S. Land Acquisition 775,000 200,000 DOE 5 yr CIP/A
550,000 GF 5 yr CIP/A
F.S.#1 1,100,000 350,000+ DOE 5 yr CIP
F.S. Hdqtrs. 1,550,000 125,000+ DOE 5 yr CIP
F.S.#2 450,000 450,000 GF-STL PAP
F.S.#2 500,000 500,000 UTAX PAP
Fire Station #5 814,000 FY 91/95 DOE 5 yr CIP/A
Golf Course Imprs. 400,000 230,000+ DOE 5 yr CIP/A
City Hall Expan. 680,000 20,000 GF-STL PAP
City Hall Expan. 1,500,000 183,266 UTAX PAP
- 3 -
t
Hurricane Shutters 85,000 15,000+ GF PFE need
CRA Ct. House 845,809 845,809 UTAX PAP
Tennis Center 1,029,000 996,438 GF-STL 5 yr CIP
.
Pub. Utility Cmplx. 260,000 260,000 91RB 5 yr CIP/A
PROJECT AMOUNT FY 90/91 SOURCE COMP PLAN COMP
SEW E R S Y S T EMS
Reqiona1 Wastewater Treatment Plant
Odor Control 5,926,525 4,985,000+ 91RB 5 yr CIP/A
Collection System and Lift Stations
Veterans Park L.S. 1,500,000 764,000+ 91RB 5 yr CIP/A
Sewer Plan Update ------ FY 90/91 UOP PFE C-1
L.S. Telemetry 219,000 139,900 84RB IŒW
80,000 UOP
These projects have a new scope with more funding required than
previously indicated. Previously they were just a part of Lift
Station Upgrading (which is now a different item).
Manhole Rehab. 2,500,000 500,000 UDEP 5 yr CIP &
(name changed to 1&1 Correction Program)
The amount allocated is greater than contained in CIE A-2.3, PF
C-2.1 & PF C-2.5 -- JUSTIFICATION: Extreme need and allocation
of funds through the Bond financing program to meet the need
through annual work.
L.S. Conversion 985,000 225,000+ UOP CF C-2
The amount allocated is greater than contained in CIE A-2.3, PF
C-2.1 & PF C-2.5 -- JUSTIFICATION: Extreme need and
allocation of funds through the Bond financing program to meet
the need through annual work.
- 4 -
-
PROJECT AMOUNT FY 90/91 SOURCE COMP PLAN COMP
WATER S Y S T EMS
Water Supply Mast. Plan 50,000 50,000 84RB PFE B-3.3
Distrib. Master Plan 50,000 50,000 UOP PFE B-1.1
Raw Water, Pumpinq, and Transmission
Emg. WF Assessment 851,155 851,155 84RB PFE B-2.4
Eight E.WF Prod Wells 130,792 130,792 84RB ( 1)
Raw Water Trans Main 285,636 285,636 84RB ( 1)
( 1 ) These are for the Emergency Well Field. It is necessary
that a needs/supply study and determination of ultimate
treatment facility proceeds a commitment to placing the
Emergency Well Field in operation.
Well Rehab. 366,000 183,000+ UDEP 5 yr CIP
Monitoring Wells 250,000 93,000+ 91RB 5 yr CIP/A
E. Atlantic Crossing 550,000 550,000 91RB flEW
S.E. (Miller) Main 730,809 500,000 84RB PAP
107,809 TFEE
123,000 91RB
See Miller Field Storage Tank for associated project
S-20 Surge Prot 127,230 127,230 84RB PAP
Boca/PB Cty. connct. 100,000 100,000 84RB PAP
Water Treatment and Storage
Lime Conversion 8,758,475 1,920,000 91RB 5 yr CIP/A
South Res. Rehab. 50,000 50,000 84RB PAP
166,000 5,000+ UDEP flEW
Beach Repump Sta. 1,150,000 360,000+ TFEE flEW
E1. .5MGD Tank Rehab 43,000 43,000 UOP flEW
Miller Tank 1,959,000 1,300,000+ TFEE PAP
(see associated transmission project)
North Storage Tank 2,306,573 226,573+ TFEE PFE, III-B-8
(@ AHS area)
North Plant Booster 300,000 300,000 84RB PAP
Water Contingency 1,808,500 348,000 91RB flEW
There is no specific project allocation. Prior to appropriation
a determination of consistency must be made.
- 5 -
Water Distribution
Ext of Service (E) 2,688,000 415,000+ 91RB 5 yr CIP/A
(See 5-yr schedule for specific projects)
Main Reloc LI/Swin. 250,000 25,000+ UOP NEW
Main Reloc LI/MT-Cong 250,000 25,000+ UOP NEW
8" Main Swinton/22nd 35,000 ------ --- NEW
8" Main Seacrest-US1 ------ ------ --- 5 yr CIP/A
2" main upgrades 1,190,496 311,437+ UOP CIE A-2.3
This allocation is greater than the $200,000/yr in A-2.3
Water System Remedial Improvement Program: (2)
Meter Replacements 400,000 80,000+ UOP
Isolation Valves 299,700 99,700 UOP
Hydrant Replacements 250,000 50,000+ UOP
Backflow Prevent Pro.2,50,000 50,000+ UOP
(2) These remedial programs (plus Treatment Plan Capital
Replacement items) are identified as needs in the discussion
of of the water system in the Public Facilities Element.
These items are funded as operating capital items and are
on-going.
PROJECT AMOUNT FY 90/91 SOURCE COMP PLAN COMP
o THE R
P.G. seed $ 500,000 500,000 DOE 5 yr CIP/A
Allamanda Gardens 100,000 59,765 DF-STL 5 yr CIP/A
Housing Rehab. 1,450,000 200,000+ GF 5 yr CIP/A
Beach Improvements 215,000 30,000 BRest CME A-I
Beach Studies 300,000 50,000 E Cont CIE A-2.3
Beach Renourishment 6,190,700 4,500.000+ E Cont 5 yr CIP
Utilities Equipment Replacement Program
Pumps and Hoses 45,000 45,000 UOP --(E)--
Hydraulic Flush 89,995 89,995 UOP --(E)--
Hyd power units 30,000 30,000 UOP --(E)--
WTP (Equip.Rep) 375,000 75,000+ UOP --(E)--
Software 132,555 132,555 UOP --(E)--
Other Equipment
Sewer TV Monitoring 45,000 45,000 UOP PFE C-6.3
Mini Camera 30,000 30,000 UOP --(E)--
Street Sweeper 125,000 FY 91/92 GF --(E)--
Front End Loaders 68,800 FY 91/95 GF --(E)--
Back Hoes 146,400 FY 91/95 GF --(E)--
Road Graders 56,500 21,500+ GF --(E)--
- 6 -
Compactor Truck 40,000 40,000 GF --(E)--
Clerk's Copier 74,456 FY 90/95 GF --(E)--
Rescu.e Uni ts 135,000 70,000+ GF --(E)--
Dump Trucks 84,000 FY 91/95 GF --(E)--
Computer System AS400
500,000 ------- GF --(E)--
COMMENTARY:
New Projects: Several items need to be identified/defined and
formally added to the 5 Year CIP. Others need to be so defined and
accepted -- the following were not shown on the adopted (as amended)
5 Year Schedule. They must be deemed consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
1. Homewood Drainage
2. Del Ida Traffic Circle (not funded)
3. Lift Station Telemetry
4. East Atlantic Crossing
5. South Reservoir Rehabilitation
6. Beach Storage Tank and Repump Station
7. Main relocation for Lake Ida Road and Swinton project
8. Main relocation for Lake Ida Road and Military Trail project
9. 8" main Swinton/22nd Street (not funded)
Projects not funded: There is currently no funding for the
following projects which are listed herein:
1. Del Ida Traffic Circle
2. Sewer Plan Update
3. 8" Main Swinton/22nd St
4. 8" Main Seacrest-US1
5. Computer System AS400 -- This item needs to be added to the
Budget and included in a revised 5 yr general fund forecast
Projects, from previous sources, not included: The following
projects are not included in this most recent draft (11/12) but were
included on the September, 1990, capital budget listing. Verify
that these projects are not to be shown.
1. Water Main x IC -- duplication
2. Water Main relocation at Atlantic and Congress -- paid
3. CBD Bypass (NE 1st st) -- this was associated with improvements
necessary to accommodate the initial Jacobson's project -- not
longer valid.
Additions to the budget documents: The following items are to be
added to the Capital Budget documents:
1. The East Central Drainage Project in FY 93/94 -- this
project had a 94/95 allocation in the initial CIP and it is
accelerated due to availability of funds.
- 7 -
2. The Soutwest Park is shown post FY 95 in the CIP, it should be
so referenced in the Budget document.
3. Equip & New Improvements to existing parks CIE A-2.3
and,
500,000 42,000 PIF PRE A-2.3
This commitment needs to be added to the budget (Parks Impact
Fund)
Items of note:
1. The delay in execution of the Northwest Drainage Project
allows the repayment of the previously borrowed funds.
Direct payment will be able to be made from the SWUTIL after
expenditures from DOE.
2. The Scrub Park Nature Trail is projected with a $30,000
increase in cost.
3. The issuance of a water and sewer revenue bond, backed in
part by a rate increase, allows for greater allocation of
funds to remedial projects. These needs were identified in
the initial Comprehensive Plan document with restricted
funding until work on the revenue bond and an assessment of
magni tude were made. This has now been addressed. Some of
the affected projects are: Lift Station Telemetry, Manhole
Rehabilitation, Lift Station Conversions, 2" main upgrades,
etc.
4. The initial Five Year Schedule did not have a substantial
allocation for projects to be funded by Storage and
Transmission Fees. Further review has shown a considerably
greater amount of funding available; and, thus projects to
accommodate needs have now been programmed.
5. The $1,808,500 for Water Contingency in the 9lRB needs some
definition/limitations?
6. Allocation of $200,000 from the General Fund for Housing
Rehabilitation programs is less than the $300,000 shown in
the Plan; however, staffing and outfitting is provided
elsewhere this year.
7. Is DOE funding being used to payback GF-STL allocation of
1989 with respect to the OSS Project?
8. A County Project (Wallace Drive Design 100,000 FY 91/92)
is to be funded with Traffic Impact Fees. This project is
for design only. The City is expected to provide for
construction of the improvements. This item needs to be
considered in the annual review of the Traffic Element.
REF/DJK#71/CIP.TXT
- 8 -
ARBITRAGE
Definition
The earnings or profit on the investment of bond proceeds over the bond yield.
Example
If the City borrows $1,000,000 at 7.0% and invests at 8.0%, the amount of arbitrage or
profit would be $10,000 (1.0% x $1,000,000).
Background
In 1986, the tax laws changed to require issuers of tax-exempt debt to rebate any arbitrage
to the I.R.S. The laws required a three (3) year spendout period with rebate being
calculated at the end of the fifth year and every five years thereafter.
Update
In 1989, the tax laws revised the spendout requirements as follows:
Spendout
· 10% of the bond proceeds plus compounded interest must be spent within
a six (6) month period.
· 45% within a twelve (12) month period.
· 75% within an eighteen (18) month period.
· 95% within a two (2) year period.
· 100% within a three (3) year period for remaining retainage only.
· Special provisions apply to refunded issues and debt service reserve
accumulations.
Rebate
The tax Jaws required the issuer to elect one of the following options:
· Rebate the arbitrage after the fifth year and every fifth year thereafter.
· Pay a semiannual penalty equivalent to 1.5% times the difference between
the required cumulative disbursements and the actual spending.
In 1990, the tax laws were revised to include a third rebate option:
· Pay a one-time penalty on the construction balances plus compounded interest
remaining at the end of the second bond year.
Rebate Exemptions
· Meet six (6) month spendout requi rement.
· Meet two (2) year spendout requirement.
· I ssue less than $5,000,000 in tax-exempt debt per year.
· Invest in qualified tax-exempt securities or tax-exempt mutual funds.
·
WATER/SEWER RATE STUDY
General Overview
City Commission Workshop
November 20, 1990
LJ5Z
WATER/SEWER RATE STUDY
OVERVIEW
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
1
FIVE (5) YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1
I I
BONDS RATES
1 1
DEBT SERVICE BUDGET COSTS
I I
1
OPERATING BUDGET
1
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
1
RA TES
·
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
CURRENT AND PROPOSED WATER RATES (Inside City)
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** **
** **
-** Current Proposed **
** Water Water Do 11 a r Percent **
** CUSTOMER CLASS Rates Rates Change Change **
** ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** Residential: **
** Customer $2.16 $1. 77 ($0.39) -17.8% **
** Capacity 7.71 7.54 (0.17) -2.2% **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtota 1 9.87 9.32 (0.55) -5.6% **
** **
** COIIIOOdity 0.5300 0.9327 0.40 76.0% **
** Conservation Surcharge 0.4663 0.47 - **
** **
** **
** **
** Non-residential **
** Customer 2.16 1.77 (0.39) -17 . 8% **
** Capacity: **
** 3/4" 7.71 7.54 (0.17) -2.2% **
** I" 7.71 12.60 4.89 63.4% **
** 1 1/2" 17.34 25.12 7.78 44.8% **
** 2" 30.86 40.20 9.34 30.3% **
** 3" 69.56 88.02 18.46 26.5% **
** 4" 97.25 158.39 61.14 62.9% **
** 6" 281.33 351.99 70.66 25.1% **
** **
** **
** COITI11Odity 0.5300 0.9327 0.40 76.0% **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
CURRENT AND PROPOSED SEWER RATES (Inside City)
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** **
** **
** Current Proposed **
** Sewer Sewer Dollar Percent **
** CUSTOMER CLASS Rates Rates Change Change **
** ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** Residential: **
** Customer - $1.78 $1. 78 - **
** Capacity Charge $7.00 8.68 1. 68 24.0% **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal 7.00 10.46 3.46 49.4% **
** **
** Commodity Charge 0.5500 0.7855 0.2355 42.8% **
** SCRWTDB Charge (a) 0.9170 0.7055 -0.2115 -23.1% **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtota 1 1.4670 1. 491 0 000240 1.6% **
** **
** **
** **
** **
** Non-residential **
** Customer - 1. 78 1. 78 - **
** Capacity: **
** 3/4" 7.00 8.68 1. 68 24.0% **
** I" 7.00 14.50 7.50 107.2% **
** 1 1/2" 15.70 28.91 13.21 84.2% **
** 2" 28.06 46.28 18.22 64.9% **
** 3" 62.88 101. 33 38.45 61.1% **
** 4" 112.55 182.34 69.79 62.0% **
** 6" 254.75 405.23 150.48 59.1% **
** **
** **
** Commodity Charge 0.5500 0.7855 0.2355 42.8% **
** SCRWTDB Charge (a) 0.9170 0.7055 -0.2115 -23.1% **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal 1.4670 1. 4910 0.0240 1.6% **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
(a) SCRWTDB Charge as determined by Utility.
,
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
VATER ~ SEVER RATE STUDY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS -- Fy 1990 through Fy 1995
...-*---........................--...--..................................................--.......-................................................
..................................-...-............................................................................................................
.. ..
.. Funding <---------------------- Fiscal Year ----------------------> ..
.. Projoct Titlo Source 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL ..
.. ------------------------------.--------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------.- ----------- ----------- ..
.. WATER: ..
.. Contingoncy/Wator Troatment Plont (0) $348,000 $1 ,248,900 $120,750 $45,425 $45,425 $1.808,500 ..
.. East Atlantic Ave Subaqueous Crossing (a) 550,000 0 0 0 0 550,000 ..
.. Monitoring Wells (a) 93,000 125,000 32,000 0 0 250,000 ..
.. Plant Conversion to Lime Softening (a) 1. 920 ,000 6,838,475 0 0 0 8,758,475 ..
.. Southeast Water Transmission Main (a) 123,000 0 0 0 0 123,000 ..
.. Backflow Prevention Program (b) 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 ..
.. Hydraulic Power Units (b) 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 ..
.. Isolation Valvos/Distrib. (b) 99,700 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 299,700 ..
.. Wator Dist. and Mastor Plen Update (b) 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 ..
.. Equipment Repl Program (c) 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 ..
.. Fire Hydrant Replacement (c) 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 ..
.. Pipeline Replacement/2" Upgrade (c) 311,437 263,124 212,811 181,874 221,250 1,190,496 ..
.. Rehab 1/2 Million Gallon Elevated Tank (c) 43,000 0 0 0 0 43,000 ..
.. South Reservoir Rehabilitotion (c) 5,000 94,000 67,000 0 0 166,000 ..
.. Water Meter Replacement Program (c) 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 400.000 ..
.. won Rehab -- Roplace . Upgrado (c) 183,000 116,000 67,000 0 0 366,000 ..
.. Beach Repump Station and Tank (d) 360,000 0 190,000 300,000 300,000 1 , 150 , 000 ..
.. Miller Tank -- Expend Vater Storago (d) 1,300,000 659,000 0 0 0 1,959,000 ..
.. North Storage Tank Eng/Const. (d) 226,573 680,000 100,000 650,000 650,000 2,306,573 ..
.. Transmission Main -- Plant to Miller (d) 107,809 0 0 0 0 107,809 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Subtotal -- Water 5,950,519 10,334,499 1,069,561 1,457,299 1,496,675 20,308,553 ..
.. ..
.. SEVER: ..
.. SCRWTDB Odor Control Upgrede (a) 4,985,000 941. 525 0 0 0 5,926,525 ..
.. Veteran's Park, Master lift Station (a) 764,000 736,000 0 0 0 1,500,000 ..
.. Hydraulic Flushing Machine Trailer (b) 89,995 0 0 0 0 89,995 ..
.. Mini Comera - T.D. Inspect of Sewer Lateral (b) 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000 ..
.. Sewer Flow Meesuring Davice (b) 45,000 0 0 0 0 45,000 ..
.. Sewer Lift Stetion Telemetry (b) 0 80,000 0 0 0 80,000 ..
.. Sewer Line Reloc. -- Congress/W Atlentic (b) 24,000 0 0 0 0 24,000 ..
.. Lift Stations Convert. To Submersibles (c) 225,000 98,000 368,000 160,000 134,000 985,000 ..
.. Manhole Rehab, Replace, Repair (c) 300,000 550,000 550.000 550,000 550,000 2,500,000 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Subtotal -- Sewer 6,462,995 2,405,525 918,000 710,000 684,000 11,180,520 ..
.. ..
.. BOTH: (e) ..
.. Enclave W/S Line Extensions (0) 415,000 895,000 773,000 302,500 302,500 2,688,000 ..
.. Public Utilities Complex - Design (a) 260,000 0 0 0 0 260,000 ..
.. Computer Software/Hardware (b) 132,555 0 0 0 0 132,555 ..
.. Leke Ida line Reloc. -- Congress - Swinton (b) 25,000 225,000 0 0 0 250,000 ..
.. Lake Ida line Reloc. -- Military Tr - Congr (b) 25,000 225,000 0 0 0 250,000 ..
.. Trench Safety Equipment (b) 10,500 0 0 0 0 10,500 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Subtotal -- Both 868,055 1. 345,000 773,000 302,500 302,500 3,591. 055 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Total -- 1991 BOND FINANCED PROJECTS $13,281,569 $14,085,024 $2,760,561 $2,469,799 $2,483,175 $35,080,128 ..
.. .--........ ...-....... ...----.-.. ...--.-..-. -........-. -.--.--.-.. ..
.. ..
.. PERCENT WATER 48.1'1. 78.1'1. 52.7'. 65.1'1. 66.4'1. 63.0% ..
.. PERCENT SEVER 51.9'1. 21.9'1. 47.3'1. 34.9'1. 33.6'1. 37.0% ..
.. . .
.. ..
...........................-...............-...-.............-..........--.--..--.............-....-.--..........--...-....-.......................
.........................-......-..-.----............-..-..-.......................................................................................
(a) 1991 Revenue Bond.
(b) Water and sewer rates.
(c) Renewal and Replacement fund
(d) Transmission and Storage F.es.
(0) Split between wator end sewer, SO/SO.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS -- BY FUNDING SOURCE
.................................................--................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
.. ..
.. <---------------------- Fiscal Year ----------------------> ..
.. Sorvico/Funding Source 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL ..
.. ---------------------------------------- ------_.--- _.-_.------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. ..
.. Water: ..
.. 1991 Revenue Bond e $3,371,500 $8,659,875 $539,250 $196,675 $196,675 $12,963,975 ..
.. Rate Fundod Capital Outlays b 271,228 330,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 826,228 ..
.. Renewel and Replacement Fund c 747,437 678,124 551,811 386,874 426,250 2,790,496 ..
.. Transmission and Storage F..s d 1,994,382 1,339,000 290,000 950,000 950,000 5,523,382 ..
.. ----------. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Subtotal -- Water 6,384,547 11 , 006 , 999 1.456,061 1. 608,549 1,647,925 22,104,081 ..
.. Percent Water 48.1% 78.1% 52.n'. 65.1% 66.4% 63.0"1. ..
.. ..
.. Sewer: ..
.. 1991 Rovenue Bond a 6,086,500 2,125,025 386,500 151,250 151.250 8,900,525 ..
.. Rato Fundod Capital Outloys b 285,523 305,000 0 0 0 590,523 . .
.. Renowal and Roplacoment Fund c 525,000 648,000 918,000 710,000 684,000 3,485,000 .
.. Transmission and Storage Fees d 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ,-
.. Subtotel -- Sewer 6,897,023 3,078,025 1,304,500 861,250 835,250 12,976,048 ..
.. Percent Sewer 51. 9% 21.9% 47.3"4 34.9"4 33.6% 37.0"1. .-
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Total -- Capital Outlays $13,281.569 $14.085,024 $2,760,561 $2.469,799 $2,483,175 $35,080,128 ..
.. ........... ....-..---. .-..-..-..- .--.-..-... -...-.....- ........... ..
.. ..
.. ..
.. ALLOCATION PERCENTAGES: Water % Sewer % Total % ..
.. ---------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. 1991 Revenue Bond Funded Projects $12.963.975 59.1% $8,900.525 40.7%$21.864.500 100.0% ..
.. Renewal and Replacement Fund 826.228 58.1% 590.523 41.7% 1.416,750 100.0% ..
.. Rate Funded Capital Outlays 2,790,496 44.5% 3.485,000 55.5% 6.275,496 100.0% ..
.. Transmission and S~or.g. F..s 5.523,382 100.0% 0 0.0% 5.523,382 100.0% ..
.. ..
.. ..
.. ..
.. ..
..............._-----*--*.-....._......*.._..................-..-.............................................._.*.................................
.........-.....--.-..................................................-.............................................................................
·
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
ADEQUACY OF EXISTING WATER CHARGES
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** APPROVED **
** UNAUDITED BUDGET ESTIMATED **
** 1990 1991 1992 **
** REVENUES: ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Charges for Service: **
** Sale of Water (a) $5,265,960 $5,388,197 $7,468.951 **
** Meter Installations 142,722 142,722 146,290 **
** Water Connection Charges 203.607 203,607 208.697 **
** Water Service Charges 70,169 70.169 71,923 **
** Fire Hydrant Charges 174,640 0 0 **
** Other Revenue (b) 353,340 221,263 224,326 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Total Revenues $6,210,438 $6.025,957 $8,120.187 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
----------- ----------- -----------
** REVENUE REQUIREMENTS: **
** Operation and Maintenance: $5,002.565 $5,572.305 $5,929,096 **
** Capital Costs: **
** Debt Service: **
** Existing (c) 929,317 921.542 1.046,719 **
** Proposed (d) 0 615,848 941,559 **
** Other Debt Related Costs 0 0 24.137 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal - Debt Service 929,317 1,537,390 2,012,416 **
** Capital Outlays (e) 378,008 271,228 330,000 **
** Renewal and Replacement (e) 612,207 747,437 678,124 **
** Other 0 0 0 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal - Capital Costs 1.919.532 2,556,054 3,020,540 **
** **
** Total Revenue Requirements 6,922,097 8.128.359 8,949,636 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** Revenue Surplus (Deficit) (f) ($711,660)($2,102,402) ($829,449) **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
----------- ----------- -----------
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
(a) 1992 revenue from Sale of Water based on adjusted rates and estimated 1991 usage.
(b) One-half of total miscellaneous revenue (See Apendix 8).
(c) Allocated between water and sewer systems based on Net 800k Value of non-contributed assets.
(d) Proposed 1991 debt service divided between water and sewer based on identified projects.
Amount shown does not include coverage.
(e) See Exhibit 1-2.
(f) Surplus or deficit given existing rates and estimated demand growth.
,
CITY OF DEL RAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
ADEQUACY OF EXISTING SEWER CHARGES
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** APPROVED **
** UNAUDITED BUDGET ESTIMATED **
-** 1990 1991 1992 **
** REVENUES: ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Charges For Services: **
** Sewer Service Charges (a) $5,849,225 $5,969,209 $8,492,303 **
** Sewer Connection Charges 165,750 165,750 169,894 **
** Ocean Outfall 0 0 0 **
** O&M Fee Solid Waste 54 0 0 **
** Other Income 1,793 1,886 1,984 **
** Other Revenue (b) 353,340 221,263 224,326 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Total Revenues $6,370,162 $6,358,108 $8,888,507 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
----------- ----------- -----------
** REVENUE REQUIREMENTS: **
** Operation and Maintenance $4,831,652 $5,323,233 $5,643,501 **
** Capital Costs: **
** Debt Service: **
** Existing (c) 1,605,706 1,592,271 1,808,557 **
** Proposed (d) 0 422,815 646,436 **
** Other Debt Related Costs 0 0 24,137 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal - Debt Service 1,605,706 2,015,087 2,479,130 **
** Capital Outlays (e) 259,524 285,523 305,000 **
** Renewal and Replacement (f) 1,057,793 525,000 648,000 **
** Other 0 0 0 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal - Capital Costs 2,923,023 2,825,609 3,432,130 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Total Revenue Requirements 7,754,675 8,148,842 9,075,631 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** Revenue Surplus (Deficit) (f) ($1,384,513)($1,790,734) ($187,124) **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
----------- ----------- -----------
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
(a) 1992 Sewer Service Charges based on adjusted rates and estimated 1991 usage.
(b) One-half of total miscellaneous revenue (See Apendix B).
(c) Allocated between water and sewer systems based on Net Book Value of non-contributed assets.
(d) Proposed 1991 debt service divided between water and sewer based on identified projects.
Amount shown does not include coverage.
(e) See Exhibit IV-2.
(f) FY 1990 and 1991 surplus or deficit given existing rates and estimated demand growth.
·
CITY OF DElRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
COVERAGE ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED RATES
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** (---------- Fiscal Year ----------) **
** **
** APPROVED **
** 1991 BUDGET **
** ACTUAL UNAUD ITED PROPOSED **
** 1989 1990 RATES (e) **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** REVENUES: **
** Charges For Services **
** Water $5,543,689 $5,265,960 $7,468,951 **
** Sewer 5,080,057 5,849,225 8,492,303 **
** Other Charges (a) 730,199 758,735 584,134 **
** Other Revenue (b) 1,310,205 706,679 442,525 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** GROSS REVENUES 12,664,150 12,580,599 16,987,913 **
** **
** LESS: O&M EXPENSES (c) 7,991,103 9,739,039 10,733,185 **
** **
** NET EARNINGS AVAILABLE FOR DEBT SERVICE 4,673,046 2,841,560 6,254,729 **
** **
** ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENT (d) 2,833,062 2,535,023 3,552,476 **
** **
** DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE RATIO (ESTIMATED) 1.65 1.12 1.76 **
** **
** MINIMUM REQUIRED COVERAGE 1.10 1.10 1.10 **
** **
** REQUIRED REVENUE INCREASE TO ACHEIVE **
** MINIMUM REQUIRED COVERAGE **
** **
** **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
(a) Includes all other charges for water and sewer services.
(b) Includes interest on investments, 1984 W/S construction bond interest, deferred payment plan, scrap sales,
miscellaneous revenues, and interest income from proposed revenue bond.
(c) Year-to-Date 1990 and 1991 budget includes capital outlays, and required deposit to the renewal and
replacement fund (5X of Gross Revenues). Excludes depreciation and transfers.
(d) 1989 annual debt service requirement as shown on page viii of the 1989 auditied financial report.
(e) Revenues estimated using 1991 rate increase and growth in population.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
DEBT SERVICE
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** (---------------- Fiscal Year -----------------) **
** **
*'* APPROVED **
** ACTUAL UNAUDITED BUDGET PROJECTED **
** 1989 1990 1991 1992 **
** DEBT SERVICE: ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** Existing Debt: **
** 1988 Series Debt Service $1,868,969 $2,497,615 $2,477,171 $2,818,175 **
** 1978 Series Debt Service (a) 27 ,297 37,408 36,642 37,101 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal -- Existing Debt Service 1.896,266 2,535,023 2,513,813 2,855,276 **
** **
** Proposed Debt: (b) **
** Issue 1 Debt Service 0 0 1,038,663 1,587,995 **
** Issue 2 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 **
** **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal - Proposed Debt Service 0 0 1,038,663 1,587,995 **
** **
** Other Debt Related Costs (c) 51 ,362 0 0 48,274 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** TOTAL -- DEBT SERVICE $1,947,628 $2,535,023 $3,552,476 $4,491,545 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
** **
*-.. **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
(a) Water and Sewer fund is charged 12.25% of the 1978 issue debt service.
(b) See Page 1-2 for assumptions on proposed debt issues. Amount includes Fiscal Agent Charges
and Amortization Expense.
(c) Includes fiscal agent charges, 1988 bond issuance costs, amortization expense and $389,509
to reconcile with budget.
. · · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . · ·
· · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · ·
· · · ·
· · · ·
· · · ·
· · · ·
· · · ·
· ·
, . .
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
SHARED EXPENDITURES -- WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS
................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................
.. ..
.. <-----------------------~---- Fiscal Year ----------------------------> ..
.. APPROVED (a) ..
.. ACCOUNT ACTUAL Unaud Hed BUDGET GRC1.ITH PROJECTED PROJECTED ..
.. DEPT - DIV 1989 1990 1991 ASSUMPTION 1992 1993 ..
.. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE: ----.-.---. ----------- ----------- .---.-.-.-- .---------- _.-._------ ------.---- ..
.. ADMINISTRATION ..
.. Persona1 Services 11 $245, 127 $345,909 $560,730 ( 1) $611,196 $666,203 ..
.. Controctual - Annual Physfcols Pro 32 0 0 0 (1 ) $0 $0 ..
.. Contractual Services 33 95,513 115,327 97,139 (6) 102,190 107,504 ..
.. Oporotfng Expensos - Mfsc 34 737,546 321. 466 205,000 (6) 215.660 226.874 ..
.. Comodftfos and Supplfo. 35 7,707 6,186 15,300 (6) 16.096 16.933 .,
.. CopHal Out lays 60 0 36,184 12,000 (6) 12,624 13 , 280 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Subtotal - Admfnfstatfon 51-11 1,085,893 825,072 890,169 957,766 1,030,795 ..
.. ..
.. UTILITY BILLING ..
.. Personal S.rvfc.s 11 466,590 $490,680 368,689 (1) 401.871 438,039 .-
.. Contractu.l Services 33 96.937 87.886 87,002 (6) 91. 526 96.285
.. Operatfng Expen.e. - Mfsc 34 0 0 290 (6) 305 321
.. Comodftfe. end Supplies 35 27,351 23.047 25.000 (4) 26,975 29,106 .-
.. Cepltal Outley. 60 0 29. 922 5,400 (6) 5.681 5,976 · .
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Subtotal- Utflfty Bfllfng 51-12 590.878 631,534 486,381 526,358 569,728 ..
.. ..
.. MISCELLANEOUS 61-11 1, 055 , 000 1,178,646 1, 249.365 (6) 1,314,332 1,382,677 ..
.. ..
.. INSURANCE 62-21 104.638 114,468 125.628 (6) 132,161 139,033 · .
.. ..
.. TRANSFERS 91-11 1.374,676 1.361,740 1. 568, 499 (6) 1,650,061 1,735,864 ..
.. ..
.. CONTINGENCY 65-11 143,297 143,297 200,000 0 200,000 200,000 ..
.. ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Subtotal -- Shared 06H 4,354.382 4,254,758 4,520,042 4,780,677 5.058,097 ..
.. ..
.. ..
.. RATE FUNDED CAPITAL PROJECTS (b) 0 637,532 556.750 635,000 75,000 ..
.. ..
.. RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT (b) 1 ,734,002 1.670.000 1,272,437 1. 326,124 1.469,811 · .
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. TOTAL -- SHARED EXPENDITURES $6,088.384 $6.562,290 $6,349,229 $6.741,801 $6,602,908 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ------.-... --..--...-- .......---- ..
.. ..
.. · .
..................................................................................................................-.............................
................................................................................................................................................
(a) Soe Appendfx A, Schedule 1. for assumed inflation rates.
(b) For 1991, 1992 and 1993 amount. See Exhfblt 1-2 (CapItal Improvoment Projects),
·, .
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA
WATER . SEWER RATE STUDY
ALLOCATION OF SHARED EXPENDITURES TO WATER AND SEWER OPERATIONS
..._e...............................................................................................................................
...........-...........-.........-..................................................................................................
.. <---------------------- Fiscal Year ----------------------> ..
o. APPROVED ..
o. ALLOCATION ACTUAL Unaudited BUDGET PROJECTED PROJECTED ..
o. SHARED EXPENDITURES (a) PERCENT 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 ..
o. ---------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -------.-.- ----------- ..
o. ADMINISTRATION (a) ..
.. Water 50.~ $542,947 $412,536 $445,085 $478,883 $515,397 ..
o. S.wer 50.0'7. 542.947 412.536 445.085 478.883 515.397 ..
.. UTILITY BILLING (b) ..
o. Water 51.3"k 303,098 323,953 249,495 270,002 292,249 ..
o. Sewer 48.7·' 287,780 307,581 236,886 256,356 277 ,479 ..
o. MISCELLANEOUS (c) ..
.. Water 53.4'1. 563,537 629,584 667,359 702,062 738,569 ..
o. Sewer 46.6'!. 491,463 549,062 582,006 612,270 644, 108 ..
.. INSURANCE (d) ..
o. Wat..r 65.0'!. 68,015 74,404 81,658 85.904 90,371 ..
.. Sewer 35.0'1. 36,623 40,064 43,970 46,256 48,662 ..
o. TRANSFERS (d) ..
o. Water 68.9'1. 959,296 940,087 1,080,771 1.136.972 1.196.094 ..
.. Sew.r 31.1'1. 415,380 421.653 487.728 513,089 539.770 ..
o. CONTINGENCY (c) ..
o. Water 53.4'1. 76,544 76.544 106,832 106.832 106,832 ..
.. Sewer 46.6% 66,754 66,754 93,168 93. 168 93,168 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Subtotal - Water OaM 2,513.437 2,457.108 2,631.200 2,780.654 2,939.513 ..
.. Subtotal - Sewer OaM 1.840.946 1.797,650 1,888,842 2,000.023 2, 118. 584 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. TOTAL -- SHARED OaM 4.354,382 4,254,758 4,520.042 4,780,677 5,058.097 ..
.. CAPITAL OUTLAYS (e) ........... ........... ........... ........... .......-... ..
.. Water 0 378.008 271,228 330,000 75,000 ..
.. S...,..... 0 259,524 285,523 305.000 0 o.
o. RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT (o) ..
.. Water 635.670 612,207 747,437 678.124 551.811 ..
.. Sewer 1.098.332 1,057.793 525.000 648,000 918,000 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Subtotal - Woter Capftal Costs 635,670 990,215 1,018,665 1,008.124 626.811 ..
.. Subtotal - Sewer Capftal Costs 1.098.332 1,317,317 810,523 953.000 918,000 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. SUBTOTAL -- CAPITALIZED OaM 1,734,002 2,307,532 1.829,187 1. 961,124 1.544.811 ..
.. ........... ........... ........... -.....-.... ........... ..
.. ..
....................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................
(a) Allocated between water and sewer SO/50.
(b) Allocated based on number of accounts (See Appondix A. Schodulo 10).
(c) Allocated based on percent of actual 1989 revenues.
(d) Al1,ocated aased on management" s est "mates.
(e) As detafled fn the capftal fmprov~ents plan (Soe Exhibit 1-2). Budgetted 1990 amount allocated between water and sewer based
on current CIP.
.,
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURES -- WATER SYSTEM
.._-*-_.........................................................................................................................................
.............................................-..................................................................................................
.. ..
.. <---------------------------- Fiscal Year ----------------------------> . .
.. APPROVED (a) ..
.. ACCOUNT ACTUAL Unaudited BUOGET GROWTH PROJECTED PROJECTED ..
.. DEPT - DIV 1989 1990 1991 ASSUMPTION 1992 1993 ..
.. ..--------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE: ..
.. ADMINISTRATION 51-11 $542,947 $412,536 $445,085 (b) $478,883 $515,397 ..
.. UTILITY BILLING 51-12 303,098 323,953 249,495 (b) 270,002 292,249 ..
.. MISCELLANEOUS 61-11 563,537 629,584 667,359 (b) 702,062 738,569 ..
.. INSURANCE 62-21 68,015 74,404 81,658 (b) 85,904 90,371 ..
.. TRANSFERS 91-11 959,296 940,087 1,080,771 (b) 1,136,972 1. 196,094 ..
.. CONTINGENCY 65-11 76,544 76,544 106,832 (b) 106,832 106,832 ..
.. ..
.. ..
.. WATER TREATMENT & SUPPLY (c) ..
.. Personal Services 11 508,365 600,538 693,893 (1) 756,343 824,414 ..
.. Contractual Services 33 618,205 674,256 793,803 (6) 835,081 878,505 ..
.. Operetfng Expenses - Mfsc 34 0 4,104 5,400 (6) 5,681 5,976 ..
.. Comodftles and Supplfes 35 346,721 337,966 443,250 (6) 466,299 490,547 ..
.. Capital Outlays 60 0 4,399 14,250 (6) 14,991 15,771 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- . .
.. Subtotal - Water 51-22 1.473,291 1,621,264 1,950,596 2,078,395 2,215,213 ..
.. ..
.. ..
.. WATER DISTRIBUTION ..
.. Persona' Services 11 477,671 534,137 737,664 (1) 804,054 876,419 ..
.. Contractua1 Services 33 165,994 142.641 162,124 (6) 170.554 179,423 ..
.. Operating Expenses - Mise 34 0 0 915 (6) 963 1,013 ..
.. Comodftfes and Supplies 35 48,591 61,275 83,806 (6) 88,164 92,748 ..
.. Capftal Outlays 60 & 64 0 186,140 6,000 (6) 6,312 6,640 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. Subtotal - Wator Dlstrfbutfon 51-23 692,256 924,192 990,509 1. 070,047 1.156,243 ..
.. ..
.. ..
.. O&M SUBTOTAL -- WATER SYSTEM $4,678,984 $5,002,565 $5,572,305 S5,929,096 $6,310,969 ..
.. .-.-.-.---- ..-.---.--- -.-------.- .----.-.-.- .-......... ..
.. ..
................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................---................................---..............*.*.*.**.....................~-..
(a) See Appendfx A Schedule 1 for assumed fnflatfon rates.
(b) Growth assumptfons used to project Shared Expendfturos are detoflod on Schedule IV-I.
(c) Includes Water Source budget fn 1989 and 1990.
,. .
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURES -- SEWER SYSTEM
...................-............................................................................-...............................................
.........................---....................................................................................................................
.. ..
.. <------------..-------------- Fiscal Year ----------------------------> ..
.. APPROVED (a) ..
.. ACCOUNT ACTUA L Unaud i tod BUDGET GROWTH PROJECTED PROJECTED ..
.. DEPT - OIV 1989 1990 1991 ASSUMPTION 1992 1993 "
.. OPERATION . MAINTENANCE: ----.----- ----.------ --.--.----- .--.------- ----------- ---.------- -------.--- ..
.. ..
.. ADMINISTRATION 51-11 $542,947 $412,536 $445,085 (b) $478,883 $515,397 .'
.. UTILITY BILLING 51-12 287,780 307,581 236,886 (b) 256,356 277,479 "
.. MISCELLANEOUS 61-11 491,463 549,062 582,006 (b) 612,270 644,108 "
.. INSURANCE 62-21 36,623 40,064 43,970 (b) 46,256 48,662 ..
.. TRANSFERS 91-11 415,380 421,653 487,728 (b) 513,089 539,770 ..
.. CONTINGENCY 65-11 66,754 66,754 93,168 (b) 93,168 93,168 ..
.. ..
.. SEWER SYSTEM ,.
.. Personal Services 11 $647,414 $708,880 $802,602 (1) $874,836 $953,571 ..
.. Contractual Services 33 318,834 317 ,428 334,909 (6) 352,324 370,645 ..
.. Op.rating Exp.ns.s - Mise 34 0 0 400 (6) 421 443 ..
.. Comoditi.s and Supp'i.. 35 2~O,O16 266,718 279,660 (6) 29~,202 309,501 ,-
.. Capital Outlays 61 0 120,472 34,900 (6) 36,715 38,624 ,.
.. ----------- .-._------- --------.-- ---._-._--- ----------- ..
.. SUBTOTAL - SEWER SYSTEM 51-41 1, 206 , 264 1,413,498 1, 452,471 1,558,498 1,672,784 ..
.. ..
.. SEWAGE TREATMENT (c) ..
.. Biotoxieity-Mast.r P'.n 32 130,683 8,141 25,000 (6) 26,300 27,668 "
.. Contractual Services 33 158,473 59,562 91,920 (6) 96,700 101, 728 ..
.. SCRWTDP Chorg.s 1,327,512 1,552,801 1,850,000 (6) 1,946,200 2,047,402 ..
.. Oporating Exp.nsos - Mise 34 22,918 0 15,000 (6) 15,780 16,601 ..
.. Comoditi.s and Suppli.s 35 0 0 0 (6) 0 0 ..
.. Capita' Outl.ys 61 0 0 0 (6) 0 0 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. SUBTOTAL - SEWAGE TREATMENT 51-42 1,639,586 1. 620 , 504 1,981,920 (6) 2,084,980 2,193,399 ..
.. ..
.. ..
.. O&M SUBTOTAL -- SEWER SYSTEM $4,686,796 $4,831,652 $5,323,233 $5,643,501 $5,984.767 ..
.. .---------. ----------. ---.------- ----------- .--------.. ..
.. ..
.. ..
............................................................---.................................................................................
.......................................................................--...........--............--............................................
(a) Se. App.dix A Seh.dul. 1 for assu~d inflotion r.t.s.
(b) Growth assumptions usod to proj.et Shor.d Exp.nditur.s .r. d.toi'.d on Seh.dulo IV-I.
(c) All Sow.g. Tr.at~nt costs .r. r.eov.r.d through th. SCRWTD8 eh.rg. eoleulatod by th. City.
..
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
PERCENT ALLOCATION OF WATER REVENUE REQUIREMENTS TO CHARGE COMPONENT
****************************************************************************************************************************.-
*****************************************************************************************************************************-
** **
** **
** (2) (3) (5) (7) (9) **
** *--
** **
** **
** ALLOCATION **
** BASIS CUSTOMER CAPACITY COMMOD ITY TOTAL **
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ *"
** REVENUE REQUIREMENTS: *"
** OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS: **
** Administration (a) 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% *"
** Utility Billing (a) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% *--
** Miscellaneous (a) 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% **
** Insurance (a) 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% *--
** Transfers (a) 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% **
** Allowance for Bad Debt (a) 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% --"
** Water Treatment and Supply (a) 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% **
** Water Distribution (a) 17.1% 41. 5% 41.5% 100.0% **
** *"
** Subtotal - O&M Costs 6.8% 24.2% 69.0% 100.0% "*
** "*
** "*
** CAPITAL COSTS: **
** Debt Service (a) 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% **
** Capital Outlays (a) 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% **
** Renewa 1 and Replacement (a) 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% **
** Other (a) **
** **
** Subtota 1 - Captial Costs 0.0% 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% **
** **
** TOTAL -- RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENT 4.5% 41. 6% 54.0% 100.0% **
** **
** **
** **
******************************************************************************************************************************
******************************************************************************************************************************
(a) Estimated by Utility personel.
(b) As requested by City Commission.
, ,
CITY OF OELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
DOLLAR ALLOCATION OF WATER REVENUE REQUIREMENTS TO CHARGE COMPONENT
*************************************************************************************************************************~~TT~
**************************************************************************************************************************TTT*
** ..
*-.. ..
. (1) (4) (6) (8) (10) ..
** ..
** 1991 ..
** REVENUE ..
** REQUIRED ..
** FROM RATES CUSTOMER CAPACITY COMMODITY TOTAL ..
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ..
** REVENUE REQUIREMENTS: ..
** OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS: ..
** Acininistration $445,085 $0 $222,542 $222,542 $445,085 ..
** Utility Billing 249,495 249,495 0 0 249,495 ..
** Miscellaneous 504,543 0 126,136 378,407 504,543 ..
** Insurance 81,658 0 40,829 40,829 81 ,658 ..
** Transfers 1 ,080,771 0 540,386 540,386 1 ,080,771 ..
** Allowance for Bad Debt 106,832 0 53,416 53,416 106,832 ..
** Water Treatment and Supply 1. 950,596 0 0 1,950,596 1,950,596 ..
** Water Distribution 493,917 84,357 204,780 204,780 493,917 ..
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ..
** Subtotal - D&M Costs 4,912,897 333,852 1,188,089 3,390,956 4,912,897 ..
** ..
** ..
** CAP IT AL COSTS: ..
** Debt Service 1,537,390 0 1,153,042 384,347 1,537,390 ..
** Capital Outlays 271,228 0 203,421 67,807 271,228 ..
** Renewal and Replacement 747,437 0 560,578 186,859 747,437 ..
** Other 0 0 0 0 0 ..
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ..
** Subtotal - Captial Costs 2,556,054 0 1,917,041 639,014 2,556,054 ..
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ..
** TOTAL -- RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENT $7,468,951 $333,852 $3 ,105,129 $4,029,969 7,468,951 ..
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ..
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
** 'T
** ..
***********************************************************************************************************************.....TY
***********************************************************************************************************************.....TY
(a) Estimated by Utility personel.
(b) As requested by City Commission.
· ,
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
PERCENT ALLOCATION OF SEWER REVENUE REQUIREMENTS TO CHARGE COMPONENT
******************************************************************************************************************************
******************************************************************************************************************************
** ..
** ..
** (2) (3) (5) (7) (11 ) ..
** ..
** ..
** ..
** ALLOCATION ..
** BASIS CUSTOMER CAPACITY COMMOD ITY TOTAL ..
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ..
** REVENUE REQUIREMENTS: ..
** OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS: ..
** Administration (b) (a) 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% ..
** Utìl ity Bill ing (a) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ..
** Mi scell aneous (a) 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% ..
** Insurance (a) 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% *.
** Transfers (a) 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% ..
** Allowance for Bad Debt (a) 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% ..
1<* Sewer System (Collection) (b) (a) 5.9% 47.1% 47.1% 100.0% ..
1<* Sewage Treatment (a) 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% ..
1<* ..
** Subtotal - O&M Costs 10.3% 45.0% 44.7% 100.0% ..
1<* .*
** ..
** CAPITAL COSTS: *..
** Debt Service (a) 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% *..
** Capital Outlays (a) 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% ..*
** Renewal and Replacement (a) 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% ....
** Other (a) 100.0% ....
** *..
** Subtotal - Captial Costs 0.0% 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% ....
** ....
** TOTAL -- RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENT 5.4% 59.4% 35.3% 100.0% ....
** ...
** ....
** ....
******************************************************************************************************************************
******************************************************************************************************************************
(a) Estimated by Utility personnel.
(b) Excludes Highland Beach.
(c) As requested by City Commission.
.'
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
DOLLAR ALLOCATION OF SEWER REVENUE REQUIREMENTS TO CHARGE COMPONENT
******************************************************************************************************************************
******************************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** (1) (4) (6) (8) (12) **
** **
** 1991 **
** REVENUE **
** REQUIRED **
** FROM RATES CUSTOMER CAPACITY COMMOOITY TOTAL **
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ **
** REVENUE REQUIREMENTS: **
** OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS: **
** Administration (b) $440,188 $0 $330,141 $110,047 $440,188 **
** Util ity Bill ing 236,886 236,886 0 0 236,886 **
** Miscellaneous 419,189 0 104,797 314,392 419,189 **
** Insurance 43,970 0 21,985 21,985 43,970 **
** Transfers 487,728 0 243,864 243,864 487,728 **
** Allowance for Bad Debt 93,168 0 46,584 46,584 93,168 **
** Sewer System (Collection) (b) 1,364,929 80,094 642,417 642,417 1. 364,929 **
** Sewage Treatment 0 0 0 0 0 **
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ **
** Subtotal - O&M Costs 3,086,058 316,980 1,389,789 1,379,289 3,086,058 **
** **
** **
** CAP IT AL COS TS : **
** Debt Service 2,015,087 0 1,511,315 503,772 2,015,087 **
** Capital Outlays 285,523 0 214,142 71,381 285,523 **
** Renewal and Replacement 525,000 0 393,750 131,250 525,000 **
** Other 0 0 0 0 0 **
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ **
** Subtotal - Captial Costs 2,825,609 0 2,119,207 706,402 2,825,609 **
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ **
** TOTAL -- RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENT 5,911 ,667 $316,980 $3,508,996 $2,085,692 $5,911,667 **
** ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ **
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
** **
** **
******************************************************************************************************************************
******************************************************************************************************************************
(a) Estimated by Utility personnel.
(b) Excludes Highland Beach.
(c) As requested by City Commission.
· .
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
FINANCIAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED WATER RATES ON VARIOUS CUSTOMER CLASSES
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** MONTHLY **
** VOLUME CURRENT PROPOSED **
-** METER {l,OOO MONTHLY MONTHLY PERCENT **
** SIZE Ga 11 ons} BILL BIll INCREASE **
** -------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** RESIDENTIAL {Inside-City} **
** **
** All 0.0 $9.87 $9.32 -5.6% **
** All 5.0 12.52 13.98 11.7% **
** All 7.5 13.84 16.31 17.8% **
** All 10.0 15.17 18.64 22.9% **
** All 15.0 17.82 23.31 30.8% **
** All 20.0 20.47 30.30 48.0% **
** All 30.0 25.77 44.29 71. 9% **
** All 50.0 36.37 72.27 98.7% **
** **
** **
** NON-RESIDENTIAL (Inside-City) **
** **
** 3/4" 0.0 9.87 9.32 -5.6% **
** 3/4" 5.0 12.52 13.98 11.7% **
** 3/4" 10.0 15.17 18.64 22.9% **
** 3/4" 20.0 20.47 27.97 36.6% **
** 3/4" 50.0 36.37 55.95 53.8% **
** **
** 1" 15 17.82 28.36 59.1% **
** I" 30 25.77 42.35 64.3% **
** 1" 50 36.37 61. 00 67 .7% **
** **
** 1 1/2" 75 59.25 96.84 63.4% **
** 1 1/2" 150 99.00 166.79 68.5% **
** 1 1/2" 300 178.50 306.69 71. B% **
** **
** 2" 150 112.52 181. 88 61. 6% **
** 2" 250 165.52 275.14 66.2% **
** **
** 3" 150 151. 22 229.69 51. 9% **
** 3" 300 230.72 369.60 60.2% **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************************~**********
.
. .
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
FINANCIAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED SEWER RATES ON VARIOUS CUSTOMER CLASSES (a)
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** ""
** ....
** MONTHLY ..*
** VOLUME CURRENT PROPOSED ....
** METER (1,000 MONTHLY MONTHLY PERCENT ....
** SIZE Ga 11 ons) BILL BILL INCREASE *..
** -------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ....
** ....
** RESIDENTIAL (Inside-City)(b) ....
** ....
** All 0.0 $7.00 $10.46 49.4% ....
** All 5.0 14.34 17.91 25.0% ....
** All 7.5 IB.OO 21. 64 20.2% ....
** All 10.0 21. 67 25.37 17.1% ....
** All 12.0 21. 67 2B.35 30.8% ....
** ....
** NON-RESIDENTIAL (Inside-City)(c) ""
** *..
** 3/4" 0 7.00 10.46 49.4% **
** 3/4" 5 13.60 17.91 31.7% **
** 3/4" 10 20.20 25.37 25.6% **
** 3/4" 20 33.41 40.28 20.6% **
** 3/4" 50 73.02 85.01 16.4% **
** **
** 1" 15 26.BO 3B.64 44.2% **
** 1" 30 46.61 61.01 30.9% **
** 1" 50 73.02 90.83 24.4% **
** **
** 1 1/2" 60 94.92 120.15 26.6% **
** 1 1/2" 150 213.75 254.34 19.0% **
** 1 1/2" 300 411. 79 477 . 99 16.1% **
** **
** 2" 130 199.70 241.89 21.1% **
** 2" 250 358 . 13 420.81 17.5% **
** ..*
** 3" 150 260.92 326.76 25.2% ..*
** 3" 300 458.97 550.41 19.9% **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
(a) Current and proposed bills includes SCRWTDB charge.
(b) Maximum Monthly Volume (Water usage) used in calculating proposed residential bill
increased from the current level of 10,000 to a level of 12,000 gallons.
(c) Current non-residential bill based on 90% of Monthly Volume. Proposed non-residential bill
based on 100% of Monthly Volume.
.
. .
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
COMPARISON OF INSIDE CITY WATER RATES AMOUNG SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** FIXED COMMODITY **
** CHARGE CHARGE PER BILL @ BILL @ BILL @ **
-** 1" METER FIRST 5,000 10,000 15,000 **
** COMMUNITY Capacity 1,000 GAL GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS **
** --------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** Seacoast Utility Authority $15.83 $1. 84 $25.03 $34.23 $43.43 **
** **
** Boynton Beach (a) 5.00 - 7.76 15.07 23.12 **
** **
** Del ray Beach (b) 9.32 0.93 13.98 18.64 23.31 **
** **
** lake Worth 2.49 0.95 7.29 12.29 20.79 **
** **
** Fort Lauderdale 6.06 0.72 10.50 16.20 21. 90 **
** 1.14 **
** **
** Boca Raton 11.59 0.35 13.34 15.09 16.84 **
** **
** City West Palm Beach 2.35 (c) 5.48 8.95 12.43 **
** **
** Palm Beach County 12.65 0.60 16.15 21. 65 33.90 **
** 1.10 **
** 2.45 **
** **
** City of Deerfield Beach 5.84 1.01 10.89 15.94 20.99 **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
(a) Minimum charge includes 3,000 gallons of water use.
(b) Calculated using proposed rates.
(c) Follows the block rate structure shown below.
Block (Ccf) $/Ccf
----------- --------
0-5 0.45
6-20 0.52
21-40 0.62
41-150 0.72
150 + 0.76
·
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
COMPARISON OF INSIDE CITY SEWER RATES AMOUNG SUROUNDING COMMUNITIES
*************************************************************************************************************
*************************************************************************************************************
**
**
** FIXED COMMODITY
** CHARGE CHARGE PER BILL @ BILL @ BILL @
.** I" METER FIRST 5,000 10,000 15,000
** COMMUN ITY Capacity 1,000 GAL GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS
** --------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
**
** Seacoast Utility Authority (a) $9.47 $1.10 $14.97 $20.47 $20.47
**
** Boynton Beach (b) 7.97 1. 27 14.32 16.86 16.86
**
** Del ray Beach (c) 10.46 1. 49 17.91 25.37 28.35
**
** Lake Worth (a) 3.61 1. 27 9.96 16.31 16.31
**
** Fort Lauderdale (d) 4.13 1. 43 11.96 20.81 29.66
** 1.77
**
** Boca Raton (e) - - 15.51 20.68 20.68
**
** City West Palm Beach (f) 2.35 1.02 7.43 12.51 13.75
**
** Palm Beach County (a) 20.50 0.85 25.25 32.00 32.00
** 1. 35
**
** City of Deerfield Beach (a) 4.06 0.98 8.96 13.86 13.86
**
**
*************************************************************************************************************
*************************************************************************************************************
(a) Sewer capped at 10,000 gallons.
(b) Sewer capped at 7,000 gallons.
(c) Calculated using proposed rates.
(d) Sewer capped at 20,000 gallons.
(e) First bathroom, $10.34, each additional bathroom $5.17. Bill shown assumes 2 bathrooms at the 5,000
thousand gallon usage level and 3 bathrooms at the 10,000 and 15,000 gallon level.
(f) Sewer capped at 11,220 gallons.
·
WA TER/SEWER RATE STUDY
General Overview
City Commission Workshop
November 20, 1990
WA TER/SEWER RATE STUDY
OVERVI EW
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
1
FIVE (5) YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1
I I
BONDS RATES
1 1
DEBT SERVI CE BUDGET COSTS
I I
1
OPERA TI NG BUDGET
1
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
1
RA TES
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..... I"') 0 0'> ...... 0 II
I:: 0 II
0) N ~ ...... LIl II
U <D ..... ..... 0 II
I- ..... II
0) II
c.. I
.... 0 0 <D N ex)
ro 0 LIl 0'> ex) N
..... LIl ...... ~ I"') .....
0 · · ·
I- ~ <D LIl I"') 0
<D ..... ...... N ex)
ex) ~ N LIl 0
..... ..... <D LIl LIl
N I"')
.... .... I
I- LIl I"') 0 0 ex) II
0) N N 0 ~ II
~ LIl LIl 0 0 II
0) II
en 0 0 LIl <D II
0 0'> ex) ...... II
<: 0'> LIl ~ 0'> II
0 · · II
..... ex) I"') N II
0:: >- .... ..... II
0 0 .... II
-i ::::> >-
U- I- 0:: I- LIl ex) <D N ..... II
en <: Q) ...... N 0'> ex) ex) II
::E: ..... 0'> N ~ I"') 0 II
::x: W ::E: ro · · · · II
U I- ::::> =- ('t') <D 0 I"') ~ II
<: <: en <D N 0'> N 0 II
W 0:: 0'> ex) ...... LIl ..... II
CD c.. · · · · II
0:: ..... N N LIl N II
>- W U ..... N II
<: =- .... .... II
0:: W 0::
-i en <:
w w
0 o¡: >-
U- 0:: W
0 W >
I- .....
>- <: U-
!- 3
.....
U
V
V 0)
..... V 0) >,
U >, U- I-
0) !\J ro
....., ~ 0) ~
0 ..... ..... C\
I- :J C ro :J
c.. 0 0) l- I/')
E 0
"C ';; 0) ..... c..
0) u IJ') .....
"C ..... !\J U
I:: a. "C
:J a. I:: I-
U- !\J 0) '" '"
u a:: 0)
-C -C c:: >-
c: -C 0
0 0) c:: LIl
CD -C ro V
c V I
0) :J ';; I
:J I..L E
I:: ~ V ~
0) 0) 0) c: to
> ..... c: '" .....
0) '" 0) I- 0
0:: a:: a:: l- I-
CITV Of DElRAV BEACH, flORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDV
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS -- fy 1991 throu9h fy 1995
*.*.t*********************************.***************_*wa_wwww_*__*____._._________._.._...._._._.__._.________._._.___._._.___________._._.._....
..--.--..-...................------.--------..-.....................................--...-.....-...............-..-----...-.--.--.----.-.....-.----
.. ..
.. Funding <---------------------- Fiscal Yea~ ----------------------> ..
.. Proj ect Tit 1 e Source 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL ..
.. ---~------------------------------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. WATER: ..
.. Contingency/Water Treatment Plant (a) $348,000 $1,248,900 $120,750 $45,425 $45,425 $1,808,500 ..
.. East Atlantic Ave Subaqueous Crossing (a) 550,000 0 0 0 0 550,000 ..
.. Monitoring Wells (a) 93,000 125,000 32,000 0 0 250,000 ..
.. Plant Conversion to Lime Softening (a) 1,920,000 6,838,475 0 0 0 8,758,475 ..
.. Southeast Water Transmission Main (a) 123,000 0 0 0 0 123,000 ..
.. Backflow Prevention Program (b) 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 ..
.. Hydraulic Power Units (b) 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 ..
.. Isolation Va1ves/Distrib, (b) 99,700 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 299,700 ..
.. Wa ter 015 t. and Master Plan Update (b) 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 ..
.. Equipment Repl Pr09ram (c) 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 ..
.. Fire Hydrant Replacement (c) 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 ..
.. Pipeline Replacement/2" Upgrade (c) 311,437 263,124 212,811 181,874 221,250 1,190,496 ..
.. Rehab 1/2 Million Gallon Elevated Tank (c) 43,000 ° 0 0 ° 43,000 ..
.. South Reservoir Rehabilitation (c) 5,000 94,000 67,000 0 0 166,000 ..
.. Water Meter Replacement Program (c) 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 400,000 ..
.. Well Rehab -- Replace & Upgrade (c) 183,000 116,000 67,000 0 0 366,000 ..
.. Beach Repump Station and Tank (d) 360,000 0 190,000 300,000 300,000 1,150,000 ..
.. Miller Tank -- Expand Water Storage (d) 1,300,000 659,000 0 0 0 1, 959,000 ..
.. North Storage Tank En9/Const. (d) 226,573 680,000 100,000 650,000 650,000 2,306,573 ..
.. Transmission Main -- Plant to Miller (d) 107,809 0 0 0 0 107,809 **
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
** Subtotal -- Water 5,950,519 10,334,499 1,069,561 1. 457 ,299 1,496,675 20,308,553 ..
.. ..
** SEWER: ..
.. SCRWTDB Odor Control Up9rade (a) 4,985,000 941, 525 0 0 0 5,926,525 ..
.. Veteran's Park, Master Lift Station (a) 764,000 736,000 0 0 0 1,500,000 ..
** Hydraulic flushin9 Machine Trailer (b) 89,995 0 0 0 0 89,995 ..
** Mini Camera - T.O. Inspect of Sewer Lateral (b) 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000 ..
** Sewer Flow Measuring Device (b) 45,000 0 0 0 ° 45,000 ..
** Sewer Lift Station Telemetry (b) 0 80,000 0 0 0 80,000 ..
** 91!I'íë¡:Lîñë-R¡¡Tõë7--=-C-¡¡1\1 reš~"'al'l"t'i c (b) 24,000 0 0 0 0 24,000 ..
** Lift Stations Convert. To Submersibles (c) 225,000 98,000 368,000 160,000 134,000 985,000 ..
.. Mannol. Rehab, Rep lace, Repair (c) 300,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 2,500,000 ..
.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal -- Sewer 6,462,995 2,405,525 918,000 710,000 684,000 11,180,520 ..
.. ..
.. BOTH: (e) ..
.. Enclave W/S Line Extensions (a) 415,000 895,000 773,000 302,500 302,500 2,688,000 ..
.. Public Utilities Complex - Design (a) 260,000 0 0 0 0 260,000 ..
.. Computer SOftware/Hardware (b) 132,555 0 0 0 0 132,555 ..
.. Lake Ida line Reloc. -- Congress - Swinton (b) 25,000 225,000 0 0 0 250,000 **
** Lake Ida line Reloc. -- Milita~y Tr - Congr (b) 25,000 225,000 0 0 0 250,000 ..
** Trench Safety Equipment (b) 10,500 0 0 0 0 10,500 ..
** ----------- ---------.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
** Subtota 1 -- Both 868,055 1,345,000 773,000 302,500 302,500 3,591. 055 **
.. --------._- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..
.. TOTAL $13,281,569 $14,085,024 $2,760,561 $2,469,799 $2,483,175 $35,080,128 ..
.. ----------- ---.---.--- --.--.----- ---.---.--. ----.---.-. --.-------- ..
.. ..
.. ..
.. **
.. ..
** ..
*********************************************************************************************************.******.*.**.*.*******.*.**.**************
**********************************..******************************************************************.***.********.**.**..*.*.*********.****.*....
(a) 1991 Revenue Bond.
(b) Water and sewer rates.
(c) Renewal and Replacement fund
(d) Transmission and Storage Fees.
(e) Split between water and sewer, SO/50.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
COMBINED UTILITY REVENUE REQUIREMENTS
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** APPROVED **
** Actual Unaudited BUDGET Projected **
** REVENUE REQUIREMENTS: 1989 1990 1991 1992 **
** ---------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** Operation and Maintenance: **
** Administration $1,085,893 $825.072 $890.169 $957,766 **
** Util ity Bill ing 590.878 631,534 486.381 526.358 **
** Mi scell aneous 1.055.000 1,178.646 1.249,365 1,314.332 **
** Insurance 104,638 114,468 125,628 132,161 **
** Transfers 1,374,676 1,361,740 1,568,499 1,650,061 **
** Contingency 143,297 143,297 200,000 200,000 **
** Water Treatment and Supply 1,473,291 1,621,264 1,950,596 2,078,395 **
** Water Distribution 692,256 924,192 990,509 1,070,047 **
** Sewer System 1,206,264 1,413,498 1,452,471 1,558,498 **
** Sewer Treatment 1,639.586 1,620,504 1,981,920 2,084,980 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal -- Operation and Maintenance 9.365.779 9,834,217 10,895,538 11.572,597 **
** **
** Capital Costs: **
** Debt Service: **
** Existing 1,896,266 2.535.023 2.513,813 2,855,276 **
** Proposed 0 0 1.038,663 1,587.995 **
** Other Debt Related Costs 51,362 0 0 48,274 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal - Debt Service 1,947,628 2,535.023 3,552,476 4,491,545 **
** Capital Funded Capital Projects 0 637.532 556,750 635,000 **
** Renewal and Replacement 1,734,002 1.670,000 1.272,437 1,326,124 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal - Capital Costs 3,681,630 4,842,555 5,381,663 6,452,669 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** TOTAL -- REVENUE REQUIREMENTS $13,047,409 $14,676,772 $16,277,201 $18,025,266 **
** ;========== =========== =========== =========== **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
CITY OF OELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
DEBT SERVICE
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** (---------------- Fiscal Year -----------------) **
** **
** APPROVED **
** ACTUAL UNAUDITED BUDGET PROJECTED **
** 1989 1990 1991 1992 **
** DEBT SERVICE: ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** Existing Debt: **
** 1988 Series Debt Service $1,868,969 $2,497,615 $2,477,171 $2,818,175 **
** 1978 Series Debt Service (a) 27,297 37 ,408 36,642 37,101 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal -- Existing Debt Service 1,896,266 2,535,023 2,513,813 2,855,276 **
** **
** Proposed Debt: (b) **
** Issue 1 Debt Service 0 0 1,038,663 1,587,995 **
** Issue 2 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 **
** **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal - Proposed Debt Service 0 0 1,038,663 1,587,995 **
** **
** Other Debt Related Costs (c) 51,362 0 0 48,274 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** TOTAL -- DEBT SERVICE $1,947,628 $2,535,023 $3,552,476 $4,491,545 **
** ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
(a) Water and Sewer fund is charged 12.25% of the 1978 issue debt service.
(b) See Page 1-2 for assumptions on proposed debt issues. Amount includes Fiscal Agent Charges
and Amortization Expense.
(c) Includes fiscal agent charges, 1988 bond issuance costs, amortization expense
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
CURRENT AND PROPOSED WATER RATES (Inside City)
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** **
** **
** Current Proposed **
** Water Water **
** CUSTOMER CLASS Rates Rates **
** ------------ ----------- ----------- **
** **
** Residential: **
** Customer $2.16 $1. 77 **
** Capacity 7.71 8.14 **
** ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal 9.87 9.91 **
** **
** Conmodity 0.5300 0.9515 **
** Conservation Surcharge 0.4758 **
** **
** **
** **
** Non-residential **
** Customer 2.16 1.77 **
** Capacity: **
** 3/4" 7.71 8.14 **
** 1" 7.71 13.59 **
** 1 1/2" 17.34 27.09 **
** 2" 30.86 43.36 **
** 3" 69.56 94.94 **
** 4" 97.25 170.85 **
** 6" 281.33 379.68 **
** **
** **
** Conmodity 0.5300 0.9515 **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
CURRENT AND PROPOSED SEWER RATES (Inside City)
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** **
** **
** Current Proposed **
** Sewer Sewer **
** CUSTOMER CLASS Rates Rates **
** ------------ ----------- ----------- **
** **
** Residential: **
** Customer - $1. 78 **
** Capacity Charge $7.00 9.10 **
** ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal 7.00 10.87 **
** **
** Corrmodity Charge 0.5500 0.8066 **
** SCRWTDB Charge (a) 0.9170 0.7055 **
** ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal 1.4670 1. 5121 **
** **
** **
** **
** **
** Non-residential **
** Customer - 1. 78 **
** Capacity: **
** 3/4" 7.00 9.10 **
** 1" 7.00 15.19 **
** 1 1/2" 15.70 30.30 **
** 2" 28.06 48.49 **
** 3" 62.88 106.17 **
** 4" 112.55 191. 06 **
** 6" 254.75 424.60 **
** **
** **
** Corrmodity Charge 0.5500 0.8066 **
** SCRWTDB Charge (a) 0.9170 0.7055 **
** ----------- ----------- **
** Subtotal 1. 4670 1.5121 **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
(a) SCRWTDB Charge as determined by Utility.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
FINANCIAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED WATER RATES ON VARIOUS CUSTOMER CLASSES
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** MONTHLY **
** VOLUME CURRENT PROPOSED **
** METER (1,000 MONTHLY MONTHLY PERCENT **
** SIZE Gallons) BILL BILL INCREASE **
** -------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** RESIDENTIAL (Inside-City) **
** **
** All 0.0 $9.87 $9.91 0.4% **
** All 5.0 12.52 14.67 17.2% **
** All 7.5 13.84 17.05 23.1% **
** All 10.0 15.17 19.43 28.1% **
** All 15.0 17.82 24.18 35.7% **
** All 20.0 20.47 31.32 53.0% **
** All 30.0 25.77 45.59 76.9% **
** All 50.0 36.37 74.14 103.8% **
** **
** **
** NON-RESIDENTIAL (Inside-City) **
** **
** 3/4" 0.0 9.87 9.91 0.4% **
** 3/4" 5.0 12.52 14.67 17.2% **
** 3/4" 10.0 15.17 19.43 28.1% **
** 3/4" 20.0 20.47 28.94 41.4% **
** 3/4" 50.0 36.37 57.49 58.1% **
** **
** 1" 15 17.82 29.63 66.3% **
** 1" 30 25.77 43.91 70.4% **
** 1" 50 36.37 62.94 73.0% **
** **
** 1 1/2" 75 59.25 100.23 69.2% **
** 1 1/2" 150 99.00 171 . 59 73.3% **
** 1 1/2" 300 178.50 314.32 76.1% **
** **
** 2" 150 112.52 187.87 67.0% **
** 2" 250 165.52 283.02 71. 0% **
** **
** 3" 150 151. 22 239.44 58.3% **
** 3" 300 230.72 382.17 65.6% **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
FINANCIAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED SEWER RATES ON VARIOUS CUSTOMER CLASSES (a)
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** MONTHLY **
** VOLUME CURRENT PROPOSED **
** METER (1,000 MONTHLY MONTHLY PERCENT **
** SIZE Gallons) BILL BILL INCREASE **
** -------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** RESIDENTIAL (Inside-City)(b) **
** **
** All 0.0 $7.00 $10.87 55.3% **
** All 5.0 14.34 18.43 28.6% **
** All 7.5 18.00 22.21 23.4% **
** All 10.0 21. 67 25.99 20.0% **
** All 12.0 21. 67 29.02 33.9% **
** **
** NON-RESIDENTIAL (Inside-City)(c) **
** **
** 3/4" 0 7.00 10.87 55.3% **
** 3/4" 5 13.60 18.43 35.5% **
** 3/4" 10 20.20 25.99 28.7% **
** 3/4" 20 33.41 41.11 23.1% **
** 3/4" 50 73.02 86.48 18.4% **
** **
** I" 15 26.80 39.65 47.9% **
** 1" 30 46.61 62.33 33.7% **
** 1" 50 73.02 92.57 26.8% **
** **
** 1 1/2" 60 94.92 122.80 29.4% **
** 1 1/2" 150 213.75 258.88 21.1% **
** 1 1/2" 300 411. 79 485.69 17 .9% **
** **
** 2" 130 199.70 246.84 23.6% **
** 2" 250 358.13 428.28 19.6% **
** **
** 3" 150 260.92 334.76 28.3% **
** 3" 300 458.97 561.57 22.4% **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
(a) Current and proposed bills includes SCRWTDB charge.
(b) Maximum Monthly Volume (Water usage) used in calculating proposed residential bill
increased from the current level of 10,000 to a level of 12,000 gallons.
(c) Current non-residential bill based on 90% of Monthly Volume. Proposed non-residential bill
based on 100% of Monthly Volume.
AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WATER
Consumption: 7,500 Gallons
Current Proposed Dollar
Category Rates Rates Change
Customer Charge $ 2.16 $ 1.77 ($ 0.39)
Capacity Charge 7.71 8.14 0.43
Commodity Charge 3.98 7.14 3.16
$13.85 $17.05 $ 3.20
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
SEWER
Consumption (Water): 7,500 Gallons
Current Proposed Dollar
Category Rates Rates Change
Customer Charge $ -0- $ 1.78 $ 1.78
Capacity Charge 7.00 9.10 2.10
Commodity Charge 4.13 6.05 1.92
SCRWTDB Charge 6.88 5.29 ( 1. 59)
$18.01 $22.22 $ 4.21
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TOT ALS $31.86 $39.27 $ 7.41
PERCENT INCREASE 23.25%
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
COMPARISON OF INSIDE CITY WATER RATES AMOUNG SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
** **
** **
** FIXED COMMODITY **
** CHARGE CHARGE PER BILL @ BILL @ BILL @ **
** 1" METER FIRST 5,000 10,000 15,000 **
** COMMUNITY Capacity 1,000 GAL GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS **
** --------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- **
** **
** Seacoast Utility Authority $15.B3 $1. 84 $25.03 $34.23 $43.43 **
** **
** Boynton Beach (a) 5.00 - 7.76 15.07 23.12 **
** **
** Delray Beach (b) 9.91 0.95 14.67 19.43 24.18 **
** **
** Lake Worth 2.49 0.95 7.29 12.29 20.79 **
** **
** Fort Lauderdale 6.06 0.72 10.50 16.20 21. 90 **
** 1.14 **
** **
** Boca Raton 11.59 0.35 13.34 15.09 16.84 **
** **
** City West Palm Beach 2.35 (c) 5.48 8.95 12.43 **
** **
** Palm Beach County 12.65 0.60 16.15 21. 65 33.90 **
** 1.10 **
** 2.45 **
** **
** City of Deerfield Beach 5.84 1. 01 10.89 15.94 20.99 **
** **
** **
***************************************************************************************************************
***************************************************************************************************************
(a) Minimum charge includ~s 3,000 gallons of water use.
(b) Calculated using proposed rates.
(c) Follows the block rate structure shown below.
$ per
Block Thousand
(Gallons) Gallons
----------- --------
3,740 $0.60
14,960 0.70
29.920 0.83
112,200 0.96
112,200+ 1.02
·
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY
COMPARISON OF INSIDE CITY SEWER RATES AMOUNG SUROUNDING COMMUNITIES
*************************************************************************************************************
*************************************************************************************************************
**
**
** FIXED COMMODITY
** CHARGE CHARGE PER BILL @ BILL @ BILL @
** 1" METER FIRST 5,000 10,000 15,000
** COMMUN !TY Capacity 1,000 GAL GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS
** --------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
**
** Seacoast Utility Authority (a) $9.47 $1.10 $14.97 $20.47 $20.47
**
** Boynton Beach (b) 7.97 1. 27 14.32 16.86 16.86
**
** Delray Beach (c) 10.87 1. 51 18.43 25.99 29.02
**
** Lake Worth (a) 3.61 1. 27 9.96 16.31 16.31
**
** Fort Lauderdale (d) 4.13 1.43 11.96 20.81 29.66
** 1.77
**
** Boca Raton (e) - - 15.51 20.68 20.68
**
** City West Palm Beach (f) 2.35 1.02 7.43 12.51 13.75
**
** Palm Beach County (a) 20.50 0.85 25.25 32.00 32.00
** 1. 35
**
** City of Deerfield Beach (a) 4.06 0.98 8.96 13.86 13.86
**
**
*************************************************************************************************************
*************************************************************************************************************
(a) Sewer capped at 10,000 gallons.
(b) Sewer capped at 7,000 ,gallons.
(c) Calculated using proposed rates.
(d) Sewer capped at 20,000 gallons.
(e) First bathroom, $10.34, each additional bathroom $5.17. Bill shown assumes 2 bathrooms at the 5,000
thousand gallon usage level and 3 bathrooms at the 10,000 and 15,000 gallon level.
(f) Sewer capped at 11,220 gallons.
<t .
[IT' DF DELIA' BEA[H
100 N'w. 1st AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 407/243-7000
MEMORANDUM
TO: David T. Harden, City Manager
FROM: Robert A. Barcinski, Assistant City Manager
Administrative Services
SUBJECT: Delray Beach Railroad Station
DATE: November 16, 1990
Backqround
We have received a letter from American National Bank, the mortgage
holder of the Delray Beach Railroad Station property, inquiring as to
the City's interest in acquiring the property. American National is
about to foreclose on this property. The outstanding balance of the
mortgage is approximately $500,000. This property was purchased by
the present owner for approximately $200,000. The bank would be
willing to work with the City in financing the acquisition, although
they were unwilling to discuss terms until the City made a commitment.
The structure on the site consists of approximately 10,200 square
feet, of which 1300 square feet has been renovated to date. Tri-Rai1
and Amtrack occupy approximately 600 square feet and do not need
additional space at this time. The balance of the building could
eventually be utilized for other purposes.
Tri-Rail and Amtrack are very interested in maintaining a stop in
Delray Beach and prefer the Delray Beach Railroad Station site.
Tri-Rail's minimum needs for the next two to three years are; ( 1 )
minimum of 50-60 parking spaces and, (2 ) a bus turnaround area. Staff
has reviewed the site and we have preliminarily determined that the
existing site could accommodate the 50 to 60 parking space requirement
but not the bus turnaround and drop-off area. Other accommodations
would need to be made for the bus drop-off area off-site. It should
be noted that Tri-Rail has authorization to operate only until June
1991. At that time a determination will be made by the Legislature
whether or not to continue this program. In order to continue the
following requirements will have to be met: Tri-Rail will have to
demonstrate a 40% fare box recovery rate on the extension lines; 79th
Street to Miami Airport and Boca Raton to West Palm Beach. Mr. Ed
THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS
·
DELRAY BEACH RAILROAD STATION
PAGE 2
Connelly with Tri-Rail has $275,000 available for site improvements
and also has funding available to extend the existing platform.
Tri-Rail has also indicated a willingness to pay rent at the rate of
$5-$10 per parking space.
Additional Property
Information
Railroad Site 1.8 acres Tax Value $487,000
Mack Industries Property 2.55 acres Tax Value $718,000
Vacant Land North Mac 1.6 acres Tax Value $241,000
Junk Yard Site 2.7 acres Tax Value $455,000
Staff has developed various site development alternatives to
accommodate Tri-Rail's needs with costs for Commission's review and
comment. At this point the bank is requesting an indication of City
interest in the Railroad depot property prior to proceeding with
foreclosure.
ALTERNATIVE 1 (INTERIM SOLUTION)
Acquire the existing railroad station site, make site improvements
necessary to accommodate the required 50 to 60 parking spaces on site,
construct required utilities and lease space from Mack Industries for
two to three years to accommodate the bus drop-off and turn around
requirement. Access would remain off Lake Ida Road. This would only
be an interim solution which would meet the current needs of Tri-Rail.
There would not be enough parking to develop the balance of the
building.
Cost Analysis Estimated
1. Site Acquisition $500,000*
2. Paving, Drainage, etc. 139,750
3. Water and Sewer 100,000
4. Contingency & Engineering 60,000
Total $799,750
Revenue Sources
1. Tri-Rail $275,000
2. Water & Sewer Fund 100,000
$375,000
1. Potential Lease Income $500.00 per month
*Mortgage Value
f
DELRAY BEACH RAILROAD STATION
PAGE 3
ALTERNATIVE 2
Acquire the existing railroad station site, make necessary site
improvements for parking, install water and sewer facilities, acquire
property west of the tracks for parking and install pedestrian
crossing to the station. The property proposed for acquisition is the
Junk Yard site. This site would accommodate approximately 178 parking
spaces and the bus turnaround. This proposal would provide for
ultimate parking needs and a Congress Avenue access. This alternative
would also provide enough parking to develop the balance of the
building. Cost estimates are as follows:
Cost Analysis Estimated
1- Acquisition Railroad Station Site $ 500,000*
2. Acquisition Parking Site 500,000**
3. Paving, Drainage, etc. 406,000
4. Water & Sewer 100,000
5. Contingency & Engineering 126,000
Total $1,632,000
Revenue Sources
1- Tri-Rail $275,000
2. Water & Sewer Fund 100,000
$375,000
1- Potential Lease Income $500.00 per month
*Mortgage Value
**Approximate Tax Value
ALTERNATIVE 3
Acquire existing railroad station site, make necessary site
improvements for parking, install water and sewer improvements,
acquire additional vacant property east of site and a portion of Mack
Industries property, construct bus turnaround, and drop area. This
alternative would provide for a one way entry off depot road, bus
turnaround and space for future parking. Access would still be from
Lake Ida. This would also provide enough parking to develop the
balance of the building.
Cost Analysis Estimated
1- Railroad Site Acquisition $ 500,000*
2. Vacant Land Mack Industries Property Acq. 450,000**
3. Develop Parking on Mack Industries Prop. 60,000
4. Initial Paving, Drainage, etc. 240,000
5. Water & Sewer Improvements 100,000
6. Contingency & Engineering 85,000
Total $1,435,000
1- Potential Lease Income $500.00 per month
*Mortgage Value
**Estimate based on Tax Value
·
DELRAY BEACH RAILROAD STATION
PAGE 4
ALTERNATIVE 4
Move Tri-Rail site to City property on Lake Ida Road and develop site
for parking, bus turnaround, and drop-off area. This site is least
desirable by Tri-Rail. The platform would have to be built to extend
south of our property and would need access approval from FP&L. This
alternative was previously rejected by City Commission. The site
could accommodate approximately 87 parking spaces. Tri-Rail has
indicated that they may eventually need 120 spaces. The estimated
cost for this alternative is as follows:
Cost Analysis Estimated
1- Paving, Drainage & Other Site Imp. $220,000
2. Platform 40,000
3. Contingency 50,000
Total $310,000
Revenue Sources
1- Tri-Rail Site Improvements $275,000
2. Tri-Rail Platform 40,000
RAB:kwg
Attachments
·
Ø?
1II1!#I American National Bank P. O. Box 39209
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33339-9209
November 9, 1990
Mr. R. Barcinski
Assistant city Manager
city of De1ray Beach
100 NW First Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Re: De1ray Beach, Railroad Station
Dear Mr. Barcinski:
As per our conversation of this morning, American National Bank has
invested in excess of $500,000.00 in the above referenced property.
This total is derived from the balance of our Mortgage Note,
accrued interest, legal fees, and other related costs incidental
to the property. We anticipate approximately $20,000.00 in
additional fees prior to culmination of the legal process. I will
use an even base of $500,000.00 for discussion purposes. We will
entertain an offer from the City of Delray Beach, and if required
to facilitate the sale, a financial package.
Please, present this information at the City Commission Meeting,
scheduled for November 20, 1990.
Very ~ruly yours,
~
H.T. Johnston
President
HTJ/lc
4301 North Federal Highway · Oakland Park, Florida 33308 · Telephone (305) 491-7788
f'?
I"1!fI American National Bank P. o. Box 39209
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33339-9209
October 26, 1990
Mr. Dave Harden, City Manager iflJC'
~i"
City of Delray Beach Ocr 3 VElJ
100 N.W. First Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444 ell." ~ 01990
Re: Delray Beach Railroad station 'A1V4G[R'
S OFF;
C[
Dear Mr. Harden:
Our last conversation concerning the above referenced property was
on August 21, 1990. At that time you indicated that the city may
be interested in purchasing the property. Our legal proceedings
and ultimate foreclosure on this property is about to come to
fruition. Since this property has the only designation as a
historical site within the city limits, I would hope that the city
desires to retain such a location. I am sure you are aware that
a state agency may provide funds, not only for acquisition, but for
renovation and rebuilding back to it's original condition. A grant
of up to $50,000.00 could be made available for the planning stages
of such an acquisition. And, last but not least, the state may
acquire such a site for ultimate use by the municipality. The Town
of Davie received a $400,000.00 grant from the state to acquire and
preserve the oldest school building in South Florida.
Anyway, what I am trying to say is that should the City of Delray
Beach be interested in acquiring this site, state funds and/or a
grant may be applied for to facilitate acquisition and renovation.
It is probably presumptuous to ask a favor, but I need to know, as
soon as possible, the city's interest in the property. If there
is no interest, we will pursue other avenues of disposal. Your
earliest reply would be appreciated.
Thank you.
I
VS\frulY yours,
. ~tt~
H. . Jo ston
Preside t
cc: Mayor Tom Lynch
Mr. Frank Spence, CRA Director
4301 North Federal Highway · Oakland Park, Florida 33308 · Telephone (305) 491-7788
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert A. Barcinski, Asst. City Manager/Administrative Services
FROM: Douglas Randolph. Grants Administr~~ .
THRU: Joseph M. Safford, Director of Finan
SUBJECT: Funding for Purchase of Delray Beach Railroad Station
DATE: November 7, 1990
In response to the letter received from American National Bank and per your
request, I have obtained the following information relative to potential
funding sources for the purchase of the Delray Beach Railroad Station:
SOURCE I: Florida Department of State, Bureau of Historic Preservation
SUNCOM: 277-2333
(Sponsor of Old School Square and Banker's Row Projects)
CONTACT: Fred Gaske, Historic Preservation Supervisor
Doug Walton, Historic Preservation Planner/Acquisition Projects
RESULT: The Railroad Station would fall under "Special Category" Grants.
The next application cycle for these Grants is April 1 through
May 31, 1991.
It should be noted that even though acquisition is eligible for
funding, such use of funds is viewed as a very low priority. The
State wants to see local funds used for such purchases as part of
a demonstrated support. State funding could then be used for
needed renovations, etc.
Of note is the fact that one acquisition project is being
considered. The City of Apalachicola has requested funds to
purchase a historic building for use as a library. The
Department of State has endorsed the request and will present the
application to the Legislature for funding. This situation is
the exception.
All persons contacted indicated that, in order to be successful,
a great deal of citizen and political support would be required.
SOURCE II State Legislature - Request for Capital Improvement Funds Florida
Statute 163.521 ("Enterprise Zones")
CONTACT: Roger Wilburn, Planning Manager, Safe Neighborhood Program
Florida Department of Community Affairs
SUNCOM: 292-5438
·
Robert A. Barcinski
Page Two
November 7, 1990
RESULT: Similar to our current proposal for supplemental funding for our
new Fire Station, we could apply for funds for the purchase of
the Railroad Station. In that we have our Fire Station
application pending at this time, we would need to wait until the
Fall of 1991 before applying.
Mr. Wilburn indicated that even though the Railroad Station would
appear to be eligible for consideration, the facility is not as
ideally located as the Fire Station. While the Fire Station is
within the boundaries of both the Enterprise Zone and the
Neighborhood Improvement District, the Railroad Station is only
located within the Enterprise Zone. The Legislature prefers
projects to be within both areas.
The letter from American National Bank mentioned that the Town of Davie had
obtained funds to purchase an old school building. With this information,
I contacted Pat McDaniels, Deputy Administrator of Davie (305-797-1000).
Ms. McDaniels indicated that they had not received funds from the State to
purchase the property, but that the County School Board had given them the
building. They have since received three small grants (Grant-in-aid)
similar to the one we obtained for our Banker's Row Project. These funds
were used for:
l. Structural Analysis
2. Architectural Design
3. Minor Restoration
They have also obtained a $317,000 Special Category Grant for major
renovations.
Ms. McDaniels advised that if we were serious about our project that a
special community-based foundation be formed specifically for the effort.
She further suggested that those involved have strong political ties. The
other ingredient is a lot of time. To get to where they are today has
taken several years and they are really just getting into the main
renovation stages. More funds will be needed prior to the completion of
their proj ect.
DR/sam
cc: David T. Harden, City Manager
David Kovacs, Director of Planning and Zoning
-~...-...~-~
(
-. ~- I )
i NOV 0 5 90 I
~ COM ·
\ M.SVCS Gn ~
\. . .,OUP
MEMORANDUM --
-
TO: Robert A. Barcinski
Assistant City Manager
THRU: William Greenwood4f}tJ~·
Director
Environmental Services
FROM: George Abou-Jaoude
Deputy Director
Projects
SUBJECT: Tri Rail Depot Station
Attached are copies of the preliminary cost estimates for
the project stated above.
These estimates do not include any engineering, surveying,
soil tests, or inspection fees. (15 to 25%)
./Í/
, /7_ /~ '7
George
Deputy
Projects
cc: W. Greenwood, Director Environmental Services
File
PC: GATRIRLl
FILE: Memos to Assistant City Manager
ALTERNATE NO. 1
ENTRANCE OFF LAKE IDA THROUGH DEPOT AVENUE
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Prepared By: George Abou-Jaoude
Date: November 5, 1990
UNIT
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
Clearing & Grading 1 L.S. 25,000 25,000
Road Widening NW 1st
St. Asphalt {1 1/2"
Type S-III 5000 S.Y. 3.25 16,250
Limerock ( 8" ) 5000 S.Y. 6.50 32,500
Stabilization ( 12" ) 2000 S.Y. 6.0 12,000
Drainage 1 L.S. 25,000 25,000
Sidewalks 1500 L.F. 6.0 9,000
Landscape 1 L.S. 20,000 20,000
SUBTOTAL 139,750
WM Ductile Iron 1400 L.F. 18 25,200
Pipe ( 8" ) 1 L.S. 7,000 7,000
Fittings & Misc. 1 Ea 1,600 1,600
Hydrant Assembly
F.M. Ductile Iron
Pipe ( 4" ) 1100 L.F. 14.0 15,400
Lift Station 1 L.S. 50,000 50,000
SUBTOTAL 99,200
SUBTOTAL PAVING & DRAINAGE 139,750
SUBTOTAL WATER & SEWER 99,200
SUBTOTAL 238,950
25% CONTINGENCIES 59,737
GRAND TOTAL 298,687
PC: GATRIL2
FILE: ENTRANCE OFF LAKE IDA
,
ALTERNATE NO. 2
ENTRANCE OFF CONGRESS AVE.
preliminary Cost Estimate
Prepared By: George Ahou-Jaoude
Date: September 18, 1990
UNIT
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
Clearing & Grading 1 L.S. 75,000 75,000
Road Widening NW 1st
st. Asphalt (I 1/2"
Type S-III) 2,000 S.Y. 3.25 6,500
Limerock (8") 2,000 S.Y. 6.50 13,000
Parking Asphalt (1") 13,400 S.Y. 3.0 40,200
Limerock (8") 13,400 S.Y. 6.5 87,100
Stabilization (12") 13,400 S.Y. 6.0 80,400
Drainage 1 L.S. 75,000 75,000
Sidewalks 1,500 L.F. 6 9,000
Landscape 1 L.S. 20,000 20,000
SUBTOTAL 406,200
WM Ductile Iron
Pipe (8") 1,400 L.F. 18 25,200
Fittings & Misc. 1 L.S. 7,000 7,000
Hydrant Assembly 1 Ea 1,600 1,600
F .M. Ductile Iron
Pipe (4") 1,100 L.F. 14.0 15,400
Lift station 1 L.S. 50,000 50,000
SUBTOTAL 99,200
SUBTOTAL Paving & Drainage 406,200
SUBTOTAL Water & Sewer 99,200
SUBTOTAL 505,400
25% Contingencies 126,350
GRAND TOTAL 631,750
!
~
ALTERNATE NO. 3
ENTRANCE OFF DEPOT AVE. THROUGH VACANT PROPERTY AND MACK
INDUSTRIES
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Pepared By: George Abou-Jaoude
Date: November 5, 1990
UNIT
DESCRIPTIOI'{ QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
Clearing & Grading 1 L.S. 50,000 50,000
Road Widening NW 1st
St. Asphalt ( 1 1/2"
Type S-III) 6400 S.Y 3.25 20,800
Limerock ( 8" ) 6400 S.Y. 6.50 41,600
Stabilization (12") 6000 S.Y. 6.0 36,000
Drainage 1 L.S. 50,000 50,000
Sidewalks 2400 L.F. 6 21 600
Landscape 1 L.S. 20,000 20.000
SUBTOTAL 240,000
WM Ductile Iron
Pipe ( 8" ) 1400 L.F. 18 25,200
Fittings & Misc. 1 L. S. 7,000 7,000
Hydrant Assembly 1 Ea 1,600 1,600
F.M. Ductile Iron
Pipe (4" ) 1,100 L.F. 14.0 15,400
Lift Station 1 L.S. 50,000 50.000
SUBTOTAL 99,000
SUBTOTAL PAVING & DRAINAGE 240,000
SUBTOTAL WATER & SEWER 99.000
25% CONTINGENCIES 84,750
GRAND TOTAL 423,750
PHASE 1 - No parking thru Mack Industries
Grand Total $423,750
Phase 2 - Parking at Mack Industries
Grand Total $480,000
PC: GATRIL3
FILE: PRELIMINARY COST EST.
~..'"'.
. rR~C~~\'90
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMO~mÐMMSVCS '
"'-..
~ ..........'A
TO: WM. GREENWOOD, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES
ROBERT A. BARCINSKI, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
GEORGE ABOU-JAOUDE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, UTILITIES DEPT.
~ULA BUTLER, DIRECTOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT
FROM: ~~~TOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 1990
SUBJECT: TRARSMITTAL OF OLD DEPOT STAFF REPORT
Pursuant to our discussion this morning, attached is a copy of
the P&Z Staff Report which was written on the Depot project in
October of 1988. This report provides additional background and
an account of service needs and requirements as of that point in
time.
DJK/cm
Attachment:
* P&Z Staff Report of October 17, 1988: Depot Square site plan
aJLANN I NG B Zl ." .L NG -BeDARD
,CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
--- STAFF REPORT ---
MEETING DATE: October 17. 1988
AGENJA ITEM: v. B.
CONSIDERATION OF SITE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEPOT SQUARE ON THE
ITEM : NORTH SIDE OF ATLANTIC AVE., BETWEEN SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD AND 1-95.
,
- .
. _ - _ _ _ l. __ . . . _
- . - - - ~
I
I ~
III f: _. "
j
I 0)
'J~d:'- ,
¡ ...
.....'"." ¡ ~
~ ~
.. ~ "'-
.
i ¡.
"I
U) ----
U) ..
III ¡ !
a:
C)
. . - . - . .. . .. . - ~z
-. ..... - - . - . o ..:::,........ - _... ._. -
GENERAL DATA:
OWner...........................Delray Beach Railroad Depot
Associates
Agent...........................P. Richard Brautigan
Location........................North side of Atlantic Avenue
between Seaboard Coastline
Railroad and 1-95.
Property Size...................l.8 Acres (78,446 Sq. ft.)
,
City Land Use Plan..............Commercial
City Zoning.....................GC (General Commercial)
Adjacent Zoning.................North and West of the subject
property is zoned MI (Medium
Industrial) . South is zoned LI
(Light Industrial). East is 1-95
and land zoned MI.
Existing Land Use...............AMTRAK railroad station. (Listed
on the National Register of
Historic Places)
Proposed Land Use...............Restoration of the structure and I
improvements to the site to meet I
Code requirements. The structure
will house AMTRAK as well as
offices.
Water Service...................Requires 8" main extension from
10" main on W. Atlantic Avenue.
Sewer Service...................Existing 4" force main along N.W. ITEM: '% b.
18 Ave. and N.W. 2nd St.
Applicant must provide a 4" force
main to tap into the 4" main at
the intersection of N.W. 18th
Ave. and N.W. 2nd St.
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD:
The action before the Board is that of making a
recommendation on a site and development plan at the site of
the Delray Depot.
The project involves the rehabilitation of the structure,
renovation to accommodate approximately 6,500 sq. ft. of
office and accessory use are, and creation of an additional
3,700 sq. ft. of office area.
The total use area approximates 10,200 sq. ft. of which 600
sq. ft. is allocated to AMTRAK operations on a lease which
runs through 1996.
Site plan action is required in that the project involves
more than 5,000 sq. ft. and is located within a General
Commercial Zone District.
BACKGROUND:
It is reported that this location and building has been used as a \
railroad station for the past sixty-two years. The structure has
been placed on the National Register of Historic Places. It is
officially identified as the "Seaboard Airline Railroad Station"
and was entered on the Record as of September 4, 1986.
The site is presently before the City Commission for
cons~deration for designation as a local Historic Site. The
designation will occur prior to action on the site plan by the
City Commission, thus the site plan is also subject to the
granting of a "Certificate of Appropriateness" from the Historic
Preservation Board. The site plan has not yet officially been
before that Board.
In March, 1987, the property was purchased by the current owners,
Delray Beach Railroad Depot Associates, a Florida general
partnership. Preliminary elevations were approved by the
Community Appearance Board in August, 1988, and work commenced on
Phase I. The phasing is as follows:
Phase I: New roof and 1,300 sq. ft. renovation for
"temporary" location of the architect and
contractor's offices.
Commenced in August, to be completed in November.
Phase II: Renovation and addition to provide 7,900 sq. ft.
To begin in November and be completed in March,
1989.
To: Planning and Zoning Board
Re: Recommendation on Site and Development Plan at Site
of Delray Depot
Page 2
Phase III: Relocation of AMTRAK to north end of the building
and renovation of the remaining 990 sq. ft. of
space. Sealcoat and striping of parking lot.
To begin in April and be completed in July.
Phase IV: Installation of landscaping and irrigation
improvements.
Proposed to commence within two years after the
building reaches 90% occupancy.
PROJECT ANALYSIS --- TECHNICAL REVIEW:
This first part of the technical review deals with the ten
standards which are required to be addressed pursuant to Sec. .
173.867. i
!
( A) Sufficiency of statements and graphic materials.
Determination as to the sufficiency of statements contained in
the application, and the graphic materials required in Sec.
173.869.
The project submittal was accompanied by a request for "landscape
relief" in that "the required landscaping would be a detriment to
the facades of this Historic Building and obscure its view from
I-95 and Atlantic Avenue.". In that letter, the agent noted that
the "plan, as submitted, may not meet with some aspects . . . of
code" . He was correct.
The submittal is deficient in the following:
173.869(E)
(12) location of all utilities;
(13) location of all buffers, fences. etc. -- sales
agreements require the provision of a fence along the
tracks; it is not shown nor provided for;
(14) location and details regarding signing;
(15) location, direction, and detail of lighting;
(16) materials and type of screening for dumpster;
173.869
(F) landscape plan per requirements and criteria of the CAB
and landscaping ordinances;
(H) full elevations (statement was provided that they had
been previously submitted to the CAB however CAB action
was preliminary only);
( I ) complete storm drainage plans; also, there is a
specific requirement in the sale transaction requiring
·
To: Planning and Zoning Board
Re: Recommendation on Site and Development Plan at Site
of Delray Depot
Page 3
drainage not to flow onto the track;
(J) a topo map extending 50 feet beyond the property;
(K) written confirmation of appropriate utilities and
services e.g. ERC sewer approval, SFWMD drainage
approval; and
(L) traffic impact statement analyzing trip generation and
impact upon street/access system.
A list of submission deficiencies has been provided to the agent.
The agent has opted to proceed with the site plan as originally
submitted.
(B) Proposed use -- effect upon adjacent and nearby properties
and the City as a whole:
Notwithstanding the absence of the required traffic statement,
the use of the structure as an office will have a positive impact
upon the immediate area. Development of the site to standards
would also have a positive impact. Renovation of a historic
structure will be posi ti ve. However, the proposal calls for j,
waiver and relaxation of standards which are to apply to f
development and redevelopment. While the use is beneficial, it .
does not warrant the degree of relief which is being sought.
(C) Ingress and egress -- determination of public safety to the
property, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian
safety, access is case of fire and catastrophe:
There is a single method of access. It is via a twenty-foot
paved area which currently exists. This entry is classified as
an "access roadway" (I02. 21) and is required to have a
twenty-four foot pavement width. A reduction in width is
allowable under 102.22(C); however, the City Engineer has
determined that the full width is required. An appeal of the
City Engineers decision can only be made by the City Commission
when application is made under subsection (D).
Trees are proposed along the access roadway. These trees violate
requirements for maintaining a clear distance of six feet from
tree trunks to an edge of pavement. While this situation poses a
basis for waiver of tree requirements, an alternative approach to
beautification of the entry should be presented.
The site plan depicts a potential southerly accessway to Atlantic
Avenue and thus retains existing pavement. Such an access to
Atlantic has been determined to be inappropriate by the City,
County, and State. Only very complex and expensive plans
involving reconstruction of Interstate ramps could provide an
opportunity for Atlantic Avenue access. Thus, the pavement area
could and should be designated for other purposes. (Again, an
alternative approach to site design should be presented.)
To: Planning and Zoning Board
Re: Recommendation on Site and Development Plan at Site
of Delray Depot
Page 4
The point of connection between N.W. 2nd Street (Depot Road) and
the access roadway results in a substandard termination of the
public street. Right-of-way dedication for a standard turnaround
(either "T" or cul-de-sac) and provision of the turnaround are
standard development requirements which are to apply. An
acceptable method of compliance has not been presented. The
existing situation is unacceptable to the City Engineer. An
appeal of the determination of the City Engineer can only be
granted by the City Commission pursuant to 102.21 and 102.22.
(D) Off-street parking and loading re suitability and location,
particular reference to pedestrian safety, traffic flow, etc.
The off-street parking requirement, based upon site plan data, is
calculated as follows:
Standard for Office Use: 4/1,000 sq. ft. up to 3,000 sq. ft.
and the 3.5/1,000 sq. ft. for amount
above 3,000 sq. ft.
Calculation: 3,000 sq. ft. @ 4/1,000 = 12
8,410 sq.ft @ 3.5/1000 = 30
requirement = 42
Complicating factor: per the existing lease agreement with
AMTRAK, 10 spaces are reserved for AMTRAK. This special use
i.e. train passengers, should be considered in determining
parking requirements especially once the site is well used,
enhanced, and security improved.
The two missing spaces must be provided. Variance authority
rests with the Historic Preservation Board. Consideration should
be given to designing future parking needs into the site.
By proposing the project to be built in phases, it seems that the
owner will be seeking occupancy before the building is completed.
He has proposed that sealcoating and striping of the parking area
be completed with Phase III. This request can be accommodated
through normal inspection and permitting procedures and does not
require action of the Board or Commission.
A single loading zone is required pursuant to 173.791. It is not
provided. Variance authority rests with the Historic
Preservation Board.
A single dumpster is located in such a manner that accessing it
and maneuvering to leave the site will block access to the AMTRAK
offices and will hinder traffic flow into the site. Relocation
to the south of the building may be more appropriate. Required
details for the enclosure of the dumpster have not been provided.
To: Planning and Zoning Board
Re: Recommendation on Site and Development Plan at Site
of Delray Depot
Page 5
There are no provisions for pedestrian access to the site.
While it may be argued that - at present - there is no pedestrian
traffic which would use the site, consideration in this early
stage of site design should be given to bringing folks from the
west side of the tracks to the building and also to taking
advantage of the space by Atlantic Avenue for creating a
pedestrian rest area or similar feature which would add to the
attractiveness of the streetscape.
(E) Screens and Buffers:
A proposal has been made to accommodate a "historic view window"
so that the structure is visible from adjacent travelways.
Within this area there is no provision for landscaping except for
grass. An alternative treatment (other than no landscaping)
could be used in this area. Water conservation and xeriscaping
techniques should be pursued, thus not only providing suitable
landscaping but also demonstrating this innovative approach to
water conservation. Another alternative is to use limited
groupings of either Sabal Palms, Royal Palms, or Canary Palms
which were all found in the Delray area when the Depot was built
--- thus reinforcing the historic era (such an approach is
consistent with the purpose statement of the City's Historic
Preservation Ordinance see 174.01.5).
The sales agreement requires fencing along the west boundary of
the development area with regard to keeping individuals from the
tracks. Such fencing is not shown. The manner in which this is
handled and its impact upon pedestrian travelways is important.
It must be addressed.
(F) Drainage:
Conceptual drainage plans have not been provided. The City
Engineer is unable to determine, based upon the information
provided, if drainage is sufficiently handled. A letter has been
provided from an engineer regarding the first floor elevation.
Such a letter does not substitute for a drainage plan. In
addition, there are specific requirements of the sales agreement
which require on-site control of drainage. A finding that this
item has been appropriately addressed cannot be made.
(G) Determination of the adequacy of sanitary sewer:
The site plan data shows use of the structure by one hundred
employees. Based upon that data, it will be necessary pursuant
to E.R.C. requirement that a connection be made to a sanitary
sewer if such a sewer exists within 1,000 feet of the site.
A private lift station exists at the auto care facility west of
the railroad tracks. That lift station feeds a force main which
To: Planning and Zoning Board
Re: Recommendation on Site and Development Plan at Site
of Delray Depot
Page 6
is located in public right-of-way. There is a point of
connection available at that force main which is within 225 feet
of the building. If this point can be accessed through the
obtaining of easements, it is the obligation of the owner to make
connection to the public sewer system. This solution is costly as
it involves bore and jack operations under the railway.
Instead of connection to the central sewer, the owner proposes to
provide a new septic system. Permitting is required through the
County. The status of the permit is unknown. (Documentation
should have been provided in the submittal.) Until such time as
it is proved that the central system cannot be accessed, a septic
solution is not acceptable.
In the event that modifications to the standard private lift
station, force main connection approach cannot be worked out, it
would be appropriate to examine participation with other property
owners to locate a lift station (east of the tracks) in such a
manner as to make a connection possible. This should be explored
prior to consenting to installation of a septic system.
(H) Other Utilities:
The current water supply to the site is a 2" service line from a
meter located next to Atlantic Avenue. There are no additional
provisions for water. Thus, there is no fire suppression system
available to the protect this historic building.
Installation of a water main with attendant hydrants is necessary
for fire suppression. Any new commercial structure would require
full extension of mains. Since this structure exists, a
compromise would require the owner to extend a main from Atlantic
Avenue to north of the structure. Fire hydrants would need to be
located in a manner to best serve the structure (as opposed to
the the standard 300' spacing requirement) and would be located
north and south of the building. The City should install an
additional hydrant at the point of connection with the Atlantic
Avenue main.
The City should explore the opportunity to participate through
the extension of the water main to the existing main which exists
in Depot Road.
(I) Open Space:
Landscaping matters are addressed under this criteria. The
concept put forth by the agent is one of eliminating requirements
as opposed to developing a well conceived landscape program. The
siting of the building provides for the use of landscaping to
To: Planning and Zoning Board
Re: Recommendation on Site and Development Plan at Site
of Delray Depot
Page 7
create visual focal points. An opportunity exists for use of the
southerly portion of the site for a landscape theme or rest area
(either now, or in the future).
Insufficient data has been provided to determine just what are
the technical obligations of the site area. Interior and
perimeter landscape areas are not differentiated in the site plan
data. Requirements for landscaping area and trees are functions
of the amount of paved area. Site designing could reduce the
amount of paved area and thus reduce landscaping and tree
requirements. However, such an approach has not been pursued.
Landscaping improvements are requested to be deferred until two
years after the structure is 90% occupied. There has not been
information provided to determine the extent of such required
landscaping. The choice of the use of continuous curbing or
wheel stops has not been made. The number of full landscape
islands has been shown. Sod and irrigation has not been shown to
the edge of pavement. Required trees and width of landscape
strips have not been met. Per the site plan and site data the
required number of internal trees is 80% deficient.
(J) Site Development -- suitability of the site plan . . .
assuring that the appearance and general layout of the
development will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and
nearby properties and the city as a whole . . . .
The development proposal meets the test of being compatible with
adjacent and nearby properties which consist of a lumberyard,
junk yard, and concrete manufacturing operations.
The development proposal does not meet the test of being
harmonious with the standard of development expected throughout
the City of Delray Beach. This is made clear through the lack of
design concept for site development and the insufficient
materials which have been presented.
ASSESSMENT:
It is indeed unfortunate that the owners have proceeded with the
redevelopment of this site without first assessing all their
costs and obligations. By right, the owner can complete Phase I
without providing the upgrading and level of service which is
addressed in this staff report. Upon the conversion of storage
space to leaseable office space and the addition of total floor
area (both Phase II components), it is necessary that development
standards be met.
Because of the prominent location of this structure and its
historic significance, the City may desire to participate in the
renovation program. Through direct participation (i.e. as a
To: Planning and Zoning Board
Re: Recommendation on Site and Development Plan at Site
of Delray Depot
Page 8
partner or owner) , the use of public funds can be justified as
they would not be justified in other cases of rehabilitation and
construction.
Options apparently available to the owner include:
- stop at the completion of Phase I;
- obtain additional funds, prepare proper plan documents,
and then continue on with Phase II;
- petition the City for equity participation;
- petition the City for a grant;
- petition the City for relief from all development
requirements including those which directly affect
health and safety e.g. water and sewer matters.
At present, the owners have proceeded with the latter option.
Unfortunately, the City Administration is not in a position to
respond to the owner's dilemma and timeframe. For any
partnership discussions to ensue, it is the responsibility of the
private party to put forth proposals (to the City Commission,
presumably through the Historic Preservation Board) or to await
the time at which a focus on the redevelopment of this area
occurs in departmental work programs.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS ON THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN:
l. Continue with concurrence and direction.
2. Since it is required that findings be made as to compliance
with the ten standards of site plan review, and since it is
impossible to make supporting findings on any item, there
appears to be not other course of action available at this
time other than denial of the site plan as it has been
submitted.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion: Denial based upon an inability to make a supporting
finding with respect to the ten standards for site plan
evaluation.
The site plan is available for review in the Planning and Zoning
Department offices.
DJK#34/A:DEPOT.TXT
§
. /
__ O~od 0 t
~
L ~1
GÆ.
~ ~~
~
I
I
I
=
. ·
!
. ·
I ;:¡
·
t
I
: I
~
I ¡
,! ,
~ f
f: , ·1
~l
0'
oJ/
. ! ' i
, " t=
I
. ..111
"' ! -r-
..
.. .,.
c ,?~
~
\~ ~
,,-
i%
~
.
/)1uiJ./I V ?If u~ tfl
\.. ...
J
I
,
I
I
4(1 en
..., I.tJ
cxl I.tJ
4(1 ~
'"
xl 0
1-1 z
zl II')
cçl 01
a:' ·
I -
1&11 2
~I 0
~I æ
L&jl ~
~I 0
4(1 0
-JI ~
gl ~
...., ~
/\/, ""
":'1 -
I :>
::1 ~
~I g
III' .... .
I en .
, j. ~I ~
!: ffil ,
~I I
exl 9
,... I D
o I
U') ..._
_____________.J 0
I
\ I LU LU
- - S ~
: ~ II) I ÍD ~
: It'-.,. I _ _.
':j.:. ~~ ~~
~~. ~ I . ~:!d ::ø
~; 0 I . u
!i ã! I : ~ N
11M I t) I-
~. -!:!!..J \
6 .,.: I >< W
.. Ó I w u
~'" ~~ ci I ~ ~
I ~::: Cl.. z
. ~ " I
f...~ "J ~
I a.. -, ¡a V'
I <I~ 'I . _
U", " "... 8 )(
I i\.Z ' '... J _ ...
..... ..I!ž '" I ~
.. <I .... .
- >..1 ø=
4( -... 00",
r ~<I III.,.
a. CLW
" ~~ ..
4( ~~ I
~~
0'1
~ : ..J
z W
j ~
- I <0.: .
I .
I
¡
.
e III
.,
0
ÕD.
;;8
:~- -- --
--röò J,33tus pU2 MN
I.LI , , ~
%
~
-------
.-
~
~ ...
4:
. %
a-
'"
4:
\
~ It
þo
'" ,
- ¡ ,
)(
101 I
.
,...
0
i-:
....'1:.
~~8
. ci:":'e:, ...
~~\ .
/'
.". /
"'
~....
vZ
. c(14I
a:~
~ ~ ....~
-c
S !Qw
~ I
~ ¡
~ III
: \:I
I ~$~~i:
O' -1. Ie:;; ~
~-:-'?-:. ~
a:..J<3vv
If'¡
ª
: ~
-. ~
....
-1%
odl4l
Q;~
~III
it'Ic(
1\1141
1
I
t
1
1
cl (I)
~I I:i
cl ~
",I
-I 0
~I z
_I
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U M E.N TAT ION
TO: ALISON'MACGREGOR HARTY, CITY CLERK
b --- ~ d~
~,J '-~
FROM: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 1990
ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 90-1
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
approval of the ordinance enacting Comp Plan Amendment 90-1.
BACKGROUND:
The public hearing has been held and the Commission is ready for
action once agreement is reached on the Five Year Schedule of
Capital Improvements. This item is one of the subjects which
preceded this public hearing.
The Amendment involves land use map changes, reprioritization of
projects, revisions to costs, deletion of completed projects,
deletion and modifications to policies/projects. All of these
items are addressed in the Amendment package which was previously
provided to the Commission.
There are three modifications to the Amendment package which was
sent to D.C.A. These items are:
* The revised Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements;
* The reinsertion of the "snorkle park" policy;
* Modifications to those policies dealing with dune
walkovers and beach access.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item
previously and at it's meeting of November 19th will consider the
revised 5-Year CIP.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approval of the enacting ordinance on final reading
~/'/:L
C I T Y COM MIS S ION DOC U MEN TAT ION
~
TO: ALISON MACGREGOR HARTY, CITY CLERK
he --- ~ d~
~,J -~
FROM: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 1990
ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 90-1
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
approval of the ordinance enacting Comp Plan Amendment 90-1.
BACKGROUND:
The public hearing has been held and the Commission is ready for
action once agreement is reached on the Five Year Schedule of
Capital Improvements. This item is one of the subjects which
preceded this public hearing.
The Amendment involves land use map changes, reprioritization of
projects, revisions to costs, deletion of completed projects,
deletion and modifications to policies/projects. All of these
items are addressed in the Amendment package which was previously
provided to the Commission.
There are three modifications to the Amendment package which was
sent to D.C.A. These items are:
* The revised Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements;
* The reinsertion of the "snorkle park" policy;
* Modifications to those policies dealing with dune
walkovers and beach access.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item
previously and at it's meeting of November 19th will consider the
revised 5-Year CIP.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approval of the enacting ordinance on final reading
· ,
~
!I
" ORDINANCE 52-90
I
I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
i
BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
90-1 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE "COUNTY AND
I MUNICIPAL PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT",
I
I FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 163; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE;
il PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
\
I WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach exercised the authority
I
I granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161
! - 163.3243 known as the "County and Municipal Planning and Land Develop-
i ment Regulation Act"; and,
I
I WHEREAS, via Ordinance 82-89 the City adopted the document
I entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida" ; and,
I
! WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning
I Agency, did prepare an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan entitled
"Comprehensive Plan Amendment 90-1"; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board as the Local Planning
Agency, following due pUblic notice, held a public hearing on May 7,
1990, in accordance with the requirements of the "County and Municipal
Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and,
WHEREAS, after the above-referenced public hearing, the Plan-
ning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, recommended to the City
Commission that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 90-1 be
adopted; and,
WHEREAS, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 90-1 was sub-
mitted to and reviewed by the City Commission; and,
WHEREAS, following due public notice, the first of two required
public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 90-1 was held by the
City Commission on May 22, 1990, in accordance with the requirements of
the "County and Municipal Planning and Land Development Regulation Act";
and,
WHEREAS, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 90-1 was forward-
ed to the State Department of Community Affairs for review and comment
on May 31, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, a report of Objections, Recommendations and Comments
has been received from the State Department of Community Affairs and
said report has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local
Planning Agency, and is the basis for modifications to the proposed
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 90-1; and,
WHEREAS, following due public notice, the second of two re-
quired public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 90-1 was held by
the City Commission on November 13, 1990, in accordance with the require-
ments of the "County and Municipal Planning and Land Development Regula-
tion Act",
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA:
I Section l. That the City Commission of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, hereby declares its intent to exercise the authority
granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161
- 163.3243 known as the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and
Land Development Regulation Act."
I
I
,¡
I
Section 2. That in implementation of its declared intent set
forth in Section 1 of this ordinance, there is hereby adopted and
incorporated herein by reference the document entitled "Comprehensive
Plan Amendment 90-1. "
Section 3. That the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan -
Delray Beach, Florida" is hereby amended pursuant to the document
entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 90-1."
Section 4. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall become effective upon the
City's receipt of Notice of Compliance from the State Department of
Community Affairs, pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 163.3184.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second reading on this
the day of , 1990.
MAY 0 R
ATTEST:
City Clerk
First Reading
Second Reading
- 2 -
[ITY DF DELIAY BEAEH
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 3]0 ST_ 1st STREET, SUITE 4 . DEL RAY BEACH, ¡LORIDA 334R3
MEMORANDtM'243-7090 · TFLFCOPIFR 407/27R-4755
Date: November 14, 1990
To: City Commission
From: Susan A. Ruby, Assistant City Attorney
Subject: Comcast Cable Television Request to Use Publicly
Dedicated Rights-of-Way
Our office has been in contact with Sheila R. Willard, Director
of Corporate Development for Comcast Cablevision regarding
Comcast's request to use rights-of-way lying within the City
limits of the City of Delray Beach.
Comcast seeks to use the City's rights-of-way to provide cable
service through the installation of fiber optic cable in the
City to customers outside the City, specifically to the Las
Verdes subdivision. Comcast has provided an agreement attached
hereto that pays the City on a one time basis $450.00 for the
use of the City's rights-of-way.
The agreement establishes that this is not a franchise with the
City and there will be no provision of cable services within
the City by Comcast via this agreement. The agreement also
provides for indemnification of the City and further provides
that Comcast will restore the rights-of-way to their original
state after installation of the fiber optic cables. It is my
understanding that approximately 70% of the cable will be
strung on FPL poles and 30% will be installed underground.
Please ensure that this matter be placed on the City Commission
~ Meeting agenda for November 20, 1990.
~. /
S : . ,.
Attachments
cc David Harden, City Manager
Alison MacGregor Hardy, City Clerk
Leadership Cablevision
National Cable
Comcast Cable
· -
LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of November,
1990 by and between comcast Cablevision ()f West Palm Beach,
I nc . , a Florida corporation (hereinafter referred to as
"Comcast") and the City of Delray Beach, Florida (hereinafter
referred to as "the City").
WHEREAS, Comcast is franchised by Palm Beach County
to provide cable television service in the unincorporated areas
of Palm Beach County; and,
WHEREAS, Comcast desires to construct a fiber-optic
cable through the City utilizing, in part, the City's
rights-of-way to deliver its television signal to its
subscribers residing outside the City; and,
WHEREAS, Comcast has represented that it will not use
this fiber-optic cable constructed in the City's rights-of-way
pursuant to this Agreement to service any subscriber located
within the City; and,
WHEREAS, Comcast is not required under either
federal, state or local law to have a cable television
franchise from the City under the conditions described herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties agree as
follows:
·
1- The City hereby agrees that Comcast may
construct and maintain in the City's rights-of-way (more
particularly described in Exhibits A and B) a fiber-optic cable
through the City.
2 . In consideration for the use of these
rights-of-way, Comcast shall pay to the City a one time payment
of One Hundred Six Dollars ($106.00) per mile for a total of
Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00). In addition, Comcast shall pay
to the City a one time payment of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars
($250.00) as a processing fee for this Agreement. The total
payment which Comcast is obligated to pay to the City under
this Agreement is Four Hundred Fifty Dollars ($450.00).
3 . Following the installation of the fiber-optic
cable, Comcast agrees to restore the City's rights-of-way to
the same condition as that prior to installation and Comcast
further agrees to maintain and repair all areas of the City's
rights-of-way that require maintenance or repair as-~ result of
the installation or placement of the subject cable.
4. Comcast shall indemnify, hold harmless and
defend, the City against, and assume all liabilities for,
damages which may arise or accrue to the City for any injury to
persons or property from the doing of any work herein
authorized, or the neglect of Comcast or any of its employees
to comply with any Ordinance regulating the use of the streets
of the City and the acceptance by Comcast of this License shall
2
·
be an agreement by Comcast to pay to the City any sum of money
for which the City may become liable from or by reason of such
injury.
WITNESSES: COMCAST CABLEVISION OF
WEST PALM BEACH, INC.
By:
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
By:
--
3
: ' '-' . ...""'" . .1'" .-.' .. " ~-' 1';1.. . . l r- . '.J:'
'. - -------
!
~
" #'
¡
¡
J
;
! .
! -"
'0'
¡
j K
,
, ~.I
1 \
--
I
! .
i
\ .. ,
·
1 .
1
;
¡
BXHIBIT A
I
---- ---. --
,
I
,
;
î
· .
î .
'"
i - ,.
, .
.-
i
-
I -..
,- .. ,
.
."
·r
¡
,
!
. -, ~.
I -
i 0
I ":
) - -. .
~ "''¡''
< , ... -...
- . . . ..,
."
} ~~
: . ')
to .. . .
· \
~
;
.-~
i
i
j
i
I
,. -
"\
i ..'-;'"'. ~
..~ ~ '"
. ....... <fr.. .
;: .~~:~,.. J:- ,
..... ..
.'-" .
".
--..I 0.
P
. .
".. : '". ;r;: .
.'~ . .
~.O,T~ 'J~W! "t ~A1
"
. .
"., "
; --
EXHIBIT B
!
-
-.
!
!
-=
:
.
,
A. THE ~ROPO$ED ~OUTING WILL
STAF~ F~oM THE aOYN~ON
BEACa ~~ADEND AT WES~
INDU~JI'fn Ar.. Dr<. SOUTH
TO BOY N'l'ON BEACH BLVD. CITY RIGHT OF W~Y (BOYNTON BCH)
,
ß. CROSSING BOYNTON BEACH BLVD.
& GOING WEST TO NW 7TH ST. D.O.T. RIGHT OF WAY
c. SOUTH ON NW 7TH STREET TO
AN ~~~f;MF.NT SETWEEN OCEAN
AVE,-' SW lS~ CT. CITY RIGHT OF WAY (BOYNTON BCH)
D. PRoctf:r)rNG WEST IN THE
A~OV~ LASBMtNT TO SW 8TH ST. CITY RIGt¡T OF WAY (BOYN'rON BCH)
E. PROCegDING SOUTH ON SW 8TH
ST. TO OCEAN DR. THEN' GOING
WEST'ON OCEAN DR. TO CONGRESS - ---..-.- -
AVE. CITY RIGHT OF WAY (BOYNTON BCH}
;
F. . FROM OC E1\N-_.QR. SOUTH ON COUNTY RIGHT OF WÀV
CONGRF$Fi AVE-: TO LAWSON BLVD.
G. WEST ON rtAWSON BLVD. TO DOVER
RD. CITY RIGHT OF WAY (OELRAY BCH)
> '.
H. SOOTH ON DOVER RD TO aAC~ --
EASt.MF.NT BETWEEN SHERWOOD
BLVD & LAWSON BLVD. CITY RIGHT OF WAY (DE~AY BCH)
I. WEST IN THE ABOVß EASEMENT
TO M¡LITARY TRAIL CITY ~tCH~ OF WAY (DELRAY BCH)
J. SOUTH ON MILITARY TRAIL TO
LAS VERDES COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY
-0:
,
.
.
1- WEST-ON LAWSON BLVD. TO DOVER
RD. , CITY RIGHT OF WAY (DELRAY BCH)
2. SQU1'H ON bOVER RD TO BACK
EASEMf.N'l' BETW~EN SHERWOOD
BLVD ~ L^WSON BLVD. CITY RIGHT OF WAY (PELRAY BCH)
3. WEST IN THE ABOVt; EASEMENT
TO H;ILI'l'ARY TRAIL CITY RIGHT OF WAY (DELRAY BCH)
~~
,
-
.
" .
· ~~~:\tf~t,~t~~~::~;~.:::~ìi0~~*~~;, "
'~~",-V:i'd~if¡...;-;..~ .,'~-.,~...~,-
'2f:~ ',' _~..".,c~'"'...,"~ .\j...-,¿'..-' -',
[ITY DF DELIÌAY BEA[H,~ ~,,' -<
! ')
I
j
,~,f~~ :.... ~~ . '_";-':-~?~'~;'~"::'_.~~~":'- ". .: ',' . .,../
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 310 S.E. 1st STREET, SUITE 4 DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA 33483
407/243-7090 TELECOPIER 407/278-4755
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 16, 1990
To: David Harden, City Manager
From: Susan A. Ruby, Assistant City Attorney
Subject: Request of Comcast Cable of West Palm Beach to
Construct Fiber-Optic Cable through the City of
Delray Beach
The City's franchising power is controlled by the Cable
Communications Policy Act of 1984. Under the Cabl~ Act, the
City may award one or more franchises within its jurisdiction
to· permit a cable operator to construct a cable system over
public rights-of-way and through easements dedicated for
compatible uses within the area to be served.
A cable~stem is defined as a facility consisting of a set of
closed transmission paths and associated signal generation,
reception, and control equipment that is designed to provide
cable service which includes video programming and which is
provided to multiple subscribers within a community.
Cable service is defined by Section 602(5) of the Cable
Communication Policy Act of 1984 as: " (A) The one way trans-
mission to subscribers of (i) video programming, or (ii) oth-er
programming service and, (B) subscriber interaction, if any,
which is required for the selection of such video programming
or other programming service."
The definition of cable service creates two categories of
services which are not considered "cable services" for the
purposes of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 and
thus, do not require a franchise from the City. First, any
two-way communication service which involves interaction beyond
the interaction required for program selection is not a cable
service. Second, any non-video service that is not "made
available" to all subscribers is not a cable service.
A service which is not a cable service is generally not
governed by the provisions of the act.
0' . .
David Harden, City Manager
October 16, 1990
Page 2
Section 337. 4061 of the Florida Statutes states that it is
unlawful to use the right-of-way of any state maintained road,
including appendages thereto for cable service purposes within
a geographic area subject to a valid existing franchise for
cable service, unless the cable system using such right-of-way
holds a franchise from the municipality or the county for the
area in which the right-of-way is located.
Research of the City's codes and state statutes shows that
there is no comparable law which prohibits the use of city
rights-of-way for non-state maintained roads unless the cable
company provides cable service within the city.
section 93.03 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray
Beach, Florida, subsection (a) states that, "The City is
authorized to award one or more non-exclusive franchises
granting the right and privilege to construct, erect, operate
and maintain in, upon, along, across, above, over, and under
any public facilities, any poles, wires, cables, underground
conduits, manholes and other television conductors and fixtures
necessary for the maintenance and operation :in the City of a
cable television system." (emphasis added). This particular
section requires a franchise when the services are to be
provided for the maintenance and operation in the City, but
does n~address the situation presented by Comcast Cable
Televi~ion wherein there is no intention to provide cable
service within the City.
Pursuant to the city's Horne Rule Powers, it is our office I s
opinion that while a franchise is not necessary, a license,
easement, or other appropriate legal document granting use of
the City's rights-of-way would be appropriate, if approved by
the City Commission. The City -may determine that it should
charge for the right-of-way use.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further
:~r concerns regarding this matter.
Attachment
cc: Jeffrey S. Kurtz, City Attorney
ItL: Nov 12,90 16:21 NO.013 P.02
.
Comolll C.blevlllon
0' Well Palm BeIOh, Jnc.
'401 Northøolnt PlrkWIY
W..t "11m belCh. Flol1dl 33407
(40T' " 7 8-8866
(407J 886-9409 FAX
~ COIVICAST
OCtober 31, 1990
-
Mr. ~vid or. Harden
City Manager
100 N.W. 1st Avenue
[)elray, FL 33444
Dear Mr. Harden:
In respQnse to your letter of 10/22/90, and to reiterate my original ~
letter of 10/3/90, I ~ requésting permission for Comcast Cable
of West Palm Beach to const~ct fiber-optic cable th~ough the City
of Delray Beach. Let me Assure you that this cable will be used
o~l~ for transmission purposes outside of the City of Delray Beach.
Any pe~i8sion granted by the city will not be interpreted as permission
(or frðnchisè) to provide residents in Delray Beach with cablet
service.
to order to help you and the City staff better understand the scope
of this project; I am providing you with the following information:
l. A map of the area indicating the desired path of construction
through the City. (Attachment f1). -
2. A narrative description of the proposed routing. (Attachment
42) .
3. A copy of the original letter which I sent to you which describes
the Federal and State laws which permit the utilization of
rights-of-way for telecommunications transportation purposes.
(Attachment 13).
Finally, to reitcburse the City for the time spentlon this request,
I suggest paying the following to the City: $106 per mile as
a permit fee and a $250 processing fee for the staff time incurred
in the ðete~ination of this r~eat. The total fee payment, therefore,
which I am propoeiog, is $450.
.-
.
IEL: Nov 12,90 16:22 No.013 P.03
If thið io acceptable to you, please let me know how to proceoo.
On behalf of Cancast, I really do thank you for aiding the Compa.ny
in providing service to your County neighbors.
Si.ncerely,
~£~
Diane L. Christie
General Manager
PLC/tbc -
. .
1
This figure is based on the amount charged for t:'ights-or-way
permits by neighboring municipalities.
2 '
$200 for permits (1.88 miles x 200) plus $250 for processing.
"
,
-
"
It.L: NOV 12,'90 16:22 No.013 P.04
.
I
.~
"
.t-
,
ATTACHMENT (J 1
I
.
"
leL· NOV l:¿,'::ìU Ib::¿j NO.Ulj 1-" . (Y.)
..ltn - .t':"cr\~·
ml.~!!..../":- ,
·_¡·..t·..··(
·~··..1···~ .
or: t·
, .. -J.........
.::: ·.:'.r~;·¡;:~ ,
_..;.~~.',. 'lJ.í""St
..._.. _....n
I :~:~.".:t ~ :~~~:.
:~':...~,.. :r.:;";::";'.
).~~~}þ~~~"
. ..
....
. ..' ," ~
..<:.,. pP.AHQEI,
,..". ...........
. ~ '. 0; : . . ."
.....~
. .'
TEL: Nov 12,90 16:23 No.013 P.06
~
,
.
ATTACHMENT '2
I
.
..
't I_I V .LL,::?V !O·LJ ~U.UIJ ~.U(
I ....... '-- ~
t ."ttU\:.'~..' Gallh!uMUU
(.f WCII;I l'OI'If' II'M(,It. h\{;
.I(J I Nrn Ihlll.,nl ,Jmkw.'y
\'t.., Palm Bnllr.h. FIOfkJ¡¡ :IJ40f
(401, 41ð'6861~ ,
I\C TJ 660'''''911 'M: I
@3 COIVICAST
..
A) TIm PROl'OSED ROUTING WILL sTAlrf
t'ROH TUE BOYN'!'ON J,U!:ACII IlEAUENO
AT WEST INDUSTRIA1. DR. SOUTH TO
BOYNTQN BEACH BLVD CITY RIGHT OF WAY (BOYNTON BClt)
B) CROSS1NG BOYNTON BEACH BLVD &.
COiNG WEST TO NW 7TH ST D.O.ï. RIGHT OF WAY
C) SOUTH ON NW 7T" STREET TO AN
EASEMENT BETWEEN OCEAN AV~ &
SW 1ST CT . CITY RIGHT OF WAY (BOYNTON neu)
0) PROCEEDING WEST 1N TUE ADOVlt
E^SI~MENT 1'0 SW 8'rn STRI~tT CITY RIGHT OF WAY (BOYNTON UCII)
E) I'ROCEf.OlNG SOUTU ON SW 8TII s'r
1'0 OCEAN UK 1'UEN <':OING W.I!t)'l'
ON OCt:AN DR'TO CONGRESS AVE CITY RIGHT OJ:' WAY I (BOYNTON neH)
.
fo') FRON OCEAN Dft SOU'l'JI ON CONC-
. RESS AVE TO LAWSON BLVD COUNTY RIGUr OF WAY.
, Co) WEST ON 1.AWSON ßLVI) TO DOVElt Rt> CITY RIGUr OF WAY (VELRAY nCII)
II) SOUTH ON POVER TO B^CK EASEMENT
B~ïWEEN SHERWOOD BLVD & LAWSON
bL.VP CITY RIGHT OF WAY (DELRAY DCn)
1) WEST IN TU~ ABOVE eASDiENT TO ,
MILITARY TRAIL CITY RIGHT OF WAY (DELRAY BeH)
J) SOUTH ON MILITARY TRAIL TO LAS
VERDES COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY
"
I
It.L: Nov 12,90 16:23 No.013 P.08
I .,t·IH:..~,1 (;:t'II.:\I~.'lJn
.., wu~ l'itllll'It,...,,,. In..
t.l" I Nt)Ilh/lu,"1 fJmkw¡'Y
\"-8&1 Pf\ tI~ (Jall<:I&, flofkJa 3JIIùt
(401,478'6QM
14( 1. 6f1G'1I4()1I f"^)( i
U~J] CCrva'CAST
,.
j
:
¡
,
A) THI': l'ROPOSED ¡WU'fING WILL START
fROM 1'UE BOYNTON Ul~ACU IŒAD~NIJ
AT WEST INDUSTRIAl. l>R.SOU'tU TO
nO'fNT~ BEAen BLVD CITY RIGHT OF WAY (BOYNTON UeU)
ll) CROSS1NG BOYNTON BEACH ULVD &
GOING WEST TO NW 7TH ST D.O.T. RIGHT OF WAY
C) SOUTH ON NW 7ïH STREET TO AN
EASEMENT BETWEEN OCEAN AVE &
SW 1ST CT , CITY RICHT OF WAY ,(ßOYNTON nCII)
I) PROCEEDINC WEST IN TilE ABOVE
~ASliliEN1' TO SW 8'rH STRfŒ1' CITY RIGHT OF WAY (DOYNTON nCII)
I': ) I'ROCEF.P1NG SOUTII ON SW 8TU 51'
TO OCEAN OR THEN GOING WEST
ON OCEAN PR'TO CONGR~SS AVE CITY IUGHT OF WAYI (BOYNTON Den)
,
I,' ) ¡:ROH OCEAN DR SoU'l'1I ON COl-W-
RESS AVE TO LAWSON BLVD COUNTY RIGHT Of WhY
.' G) WEST ON LAWSON nLVD ,TO POVER RD CITY RICHT OF WAY (DELRAY nell)
II) SOUTH ON DOVER TO BACK EASEMEN1' _.
BEtWEEN SHERWOOD BLVD , LAWSON
BLVD CITY RICHT OF WAY (DELRAY DCn)
1) WEST IN THt A80VE EASEMENT TO ,
MILITARY 'fRAIL CITY RIGHT OF WAY (DELRAY DCa)
J) SOUTH ON MILITARY TRAIL TO LAS
VERDES COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY
~
,
IC.L· NOV lL',I:IU 16:26 NO.013 P.09
.
..
ATTACHMENT 113
-
,
.
-,
.
..
.
-
tt.l: t'1ov 12,90 16:26 No.013 P.l0
COMCAflI Cllbløvl.lon
of Walt Palm 00101\ 'nC- .
1401 Northpolnt Plrkway
W$*I Pllm et$t;h, Florida 33401
("O11418'~866
(40n 688'~499 fAX
Cê3 COIVICAST
OctOber 3, 1990
Mt. David or. Harden
City Manager
100 N.W. 1st Avenue
Del ray, FL 33444
Dear Mr. Harden:
Comcast Cable of West Palm Beach requeste permission to construct
fiber-optic cable through the City of Dalray Beach. These cables
~ill be used only for transmission purposes outside of the city ..
of Delray Beach. Comcast does not and will not interpret any permission
9ranted by the City to construct this fiber-optic system 88 pet11)ission
(or franchise) to provide residents in Delray Beach with cable
service.
The Cable COIJ1nuniœtions Policy Act of 1984 does not prohibita
cable operator from using city roads and rights-of-ways for construction
of ita sy~tem, however, it does prohibit that cable operator from
providing cable televiaion service without ð cable television franchise.
47 V.S.C. Sec. 5412 (b) (1) specifically providee that "a cable
operator may not provide cable service without a franchise. II "Cable
service" is defineð to include tithe one way transmission to subscribers
of (1) video pr09rarrrning, or (ii) other prograzrrning service."
47 U.S.C. Sec. 522 (5) (A). Furthermore, Sec. 541 of the Cable
Act provides that a franchising authority may award one or more
tlfranchises" within its jurisdiction, and a franchise is defined
to mean the authorization "which authorizes the construction or
operation of a cable system". In turn, a "cable system" is defined
to mean a "facility, consisting of a set of closed tansmission
patha and associated signal generation, reception, and control
equipment that is designed to p~vida a cable service which includes
video programming and which is provided multiple subscribers within
a community..... 47 O.S.C. (522 (b». Florida law is consistent
in its definitio~8 and provisions. Fla. Stat. 166.046 (1987).
The sum of these provisiQns demonstrate that if Comcðat wanted
to service customers in Delray Beach, it would have to apply for
11 franchise to proceed., This application procedure Is dictated
by Federal, State and Delray Ðeach laws.
.
\ ."_' V .J...L,....IV .L\"'"LV I~U.VJ.J r.ll
--
.
In addition, a franchise is only required for the use of State
right-of-ways whên the intent is to service customers. The use
of the ri9ht-ol~ð.Y8 for transportation only purposes is permitted
by Florida Law.
If your have any questions please don't hesitate to give me a call.
Sincerely,
j)tJ:t,{~ / e4U:1~tu./
Diane L. Christie
General Manager
DLC/tbc
.,
j'
--
.
.
,:
! -'
.
..
4.f ~ j _.___.__._____,'_. _'_____ _____ > .____~. _n_
-~" -
,I ¡
'11 RESOLUTION NO. 112-90
! 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, OPPOSING AN EFFORT BY
THE PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS-
~ l SIONERS TO MAKE ALL COUNTY ORDINANCES RELATING
I f TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS APPLICABLE
AND ENFORCEABLE WITHIN MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
WHEREAS, the Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners
. \ adopted Ordinance No. 89-23, the "Environmentally Sensitive Lands
,
. Ordinance," on October 17, 1989; and,
t ¡
WHEREAS, said "Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance"
, contained a provision enabling municipalities to "opt out," causing same
to be inapplicable and unenforceable within their boundaries; and,
1 WHEREAS, the Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners on I
; September 25, 1990, approved on first reading an Ordinance that would I
\
t ". place a referendum question on a ballot to be voted on February 5, 1991,
I asking County voters to approve the applicability and enforcement of all
.
County Ordinances relating to environmentally sensitive lands within
t J municipal boundaries,
~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
, CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
J Section l. The City Commission of the City of Delray Beach
opposes the effort of the Palm Beach County board of County Commis-
~ sioners to make all County Ordinances relative to environmentally
dJ sensitive lands applicable and enforceable within municipal boundaries.
·
·
~ Section 2. The City Commission of the City of Delray Beach
. 1 hereby directs that the City Clerk provide official copies of this
Resolution to each Palm Beach County Commissioner, to the County
..~ Administrator, and to the Mayors of all municipalities in Palm Beach
í County.
~ PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 27th day of
<II November, 1990.
;' ì, :..t
·
, ..
·
- :t MAY 0 R
..
.. ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
I 4
~ ¡
·
3,'3
10 V\;~kóvf\6j :V,
- I I~?, LìO:Y.; -o~! I ( I tf (i 0
RESOLUTION NO. !) 0 7- Wi 1 4
I
, ,
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COMMISSION OF THE
'roWN OF GULF STREAM, PALM BEACH COUNTY~ "...,..ro_._·...--··"""·....·
FLORIDA, OPPOSING AN EFFORT BY THE PALM
BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
i TO MAKE ALL COUNTY ORDINANCES RELATING
i TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS APPLICABLE
II AND ENFORCEABLE WITHIN MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. !
I
I WHEREAS, the Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners
I
l¡adoPted Ordinance No. 89-23, the ·Enviro~entally Sensitive Lands
i Ordinance," on October 17, 1989¡ and
II
¡¡ WHEREAS, said "Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance"
¡I contained a provision enabling municipalities to "opt out,"
I¡causing same to be inapplicable and unenforceable within their I
I boundaries ¡and I
II
lì
I
II WHEREAS, the Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners I
lion September 25, 1990, approved on first reading an Ordinance I
I that would place a referendum question on a ballot to be voted I
I
I on February 5, 1991, asking County voters to approve the I
1
I applicability and enforcement of all County Ordinances relating I
I to environmentally sensitive lands within municipal boundaries.
II I
!I !
I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COMMISSION OF THE i
follows: i
I TOWN OF GULF STREAM, as
I ¡
I
I
Section I, The Town Commission of the Town of Gulf Stream I
opposes the effort of the Palm Beach County Board of County
I
Commissioners to make all County Ordinances relative to environ-
mentally sensitive lands applicable and enforceable within
municipal boundaries.
Section 2. The Town Commission of the Town of Gulf Stream
I
I hereby directs that the Town Clerk provide official copies of
, this Resolution to each Palm Beach County Commissioner, to the
I
! County Administrator, and to the mayors of all municipalities in
I Palm Beach County.
I PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session assembled this
I
9tþ- day of November , 1990.
1
I
,
1\ TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA
Ii MAYOR ~
II ~~~ ~
Ii
I ~ MAYOR ~)
I
I ATTEST: ~A.J
i /2~ti --
CO~/' NER .
- .7 ,/"'/'
"'~~ , - a/~
/ ///ß'<.-L-rL.<-_---<=--c,
TOWN COMMISSIONER