04-14-15 Special/Workshop Meeting c
0
N
N
E
E
0
V
mo >%
C
V
C: 0
V N � Ln
ra E � � C: T---
Q) C� o 0
m (1) 0
C �
E C:)
0 � a
4 anr--
O O C O
N 0 N
O J >.
n L.
V 0
(1)
A> 4—J N
W
r
V
Ln
O O V N Q
Ln C: O N a-J C
>_
o O 0 �' O ,0 ON C:0 Un U `� � N
V
E - N U-
On _>
O 4-J o
� 'N V •�
O � � � 0 +J
O �
Q > Q ,^ �
� a � '3 N Ln CL
.0
3 4-J 00" � N C:
C-4 Ln
o •o > f6 4- C: 4- c_n
° a Q N 'E
•
u
Q .
N
N 4-J � •> � 3 �
O N m 0 N 3 - 4-j
Q)
m O ra `n '0 v N N 3 Ln
era 3 = � Q V � N
a� C: O O 0 3 N 0
O N Ln
C'-4 E >
O O Q 0 m E
�O M �' V 0 � � Q �O �
U1) " .� 3 O
O cn N m O 4- V V
LL- LL- a E 4 LL 3tj
N
(1)
N 4-J m
4--J O O
C C: Q
O 'N O
a--J
o o
un
o O C: +-J � 'j C:
E N 4-J Ln
E v 00 � 4- 4 N
� C: N N 0 N O >
o �O o 'r
J r- Q) 4 J
a- 4- L- N
V N �
Ln 3
4-1 00 o O
0 C) `� N N V
Ln
C) a N N N Ln
\ a--J
E S Q O r6 : cn V � O
o p N 4-J V N
u p L- � Q u 0 3
a N O N V cn V � C O
V N � �
m O N � N N u
L a-J N� .� V
L •� � N �J 'N � � WI W
Q� ( O � ., C:
N -0 p C: f6
Q N •� N V
O _ E N
c6 C (a � L
�' �J >% .V '� cn .N a.., N
O > 4J O C:
a Q E U- = E cA O .,
cn ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
N
N
U N
0 0 v
O 0 N
on -0
.E U
i O
N
� N �
N E 3
� v �
�o O L > N
N N 0 J
°'
N E (a O },
OA U Cd 4-1 f�
_ _>
0 � f � Z; � N
U
a 4-J
> O f�
E O O d
Ln C AE u Q \
N O- Q) N
a-.+ 00 O N >O >+
= oN 0 E CA OL O N
N dE O O�
_ L
O 0 N L
° Q U o `� ° v on
O \ CA
U � -o-a c� � v v v E 0 X
CA O N
U fU O N O N Q �O N
cu u
CA f
ca N \ Ou LL-
O
N L N N QZ)
cl
N N M L 0 U � -d O ate-' Co
O N O N N .> N 0 v L M CA
E Q Vf > L N Vf a--+ U O N
� i 0 � 0 N a--+ L M U U J f�
0 a + O .O U an > N N N 0 d L N O-
N >+L7 E � � Z SQL � LL � LL OUtnm OUP
a + N
0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ V ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
N _
U L7 — � Q
Q)
�
Lf ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
},
> u
o 4-J o
Q -v (aa On
a c v c Q
ca a O ca
c � Q 4 v o -c
N -� a) .� a) o
Q E 7 Q N_ m L a) 4••7
on ro � E � Ln ° c c N ca
4' ^ a E a E N
On ca O fa L O
O U O U U U O On ro On On E O
Q Ln
O pn L "O "O Q ca m O Q
> to � fa
L On m m O_ Q N G (a
v a a) a a) O O N u on
_ a)
On � .O U '� O N O O �o J � v' m CO .O ate.+
O to L O L L N 4-J L N N
-p 'E ca >+ >+ Q >+ N Q cn >+ N J U
a) � cu E �' �' O ^n �' o � � � � a
is E is O
L CO -p L H U ca m �+ d cn Q o
H � � +J
,•, 00 p c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O N a)
L
fV O +-+ �O
O O O ++
O 3
N � C' L n L N a ro
E L V O
O a) N N p a) cn cn Lm ca ca
>% 3 �' > c O U On j >+ O
E cu U � a) On 4- N O "O 0 7
CO CO
cu
4-J > ateJ — 4-J fa N N On
++ :v �, U ca CO E > c ca
to On++ a)
L U O a) M L On
L
m N CO L � p- � N L U J O
L �, a) Q = = ' E cu >� � cn m
N -O p �' L O .. N � U ca
O is O
N is m O on � }; O N
Q 4-J O O i 7 � ca > .2 a) a)
E t6 ca O 0 p J O- ate•, N
E � � >+ E 0C +� E ac o o a) 4>,O
E E cu I"O > C LL- Lv U O > N
fa L L > > > �
p 0 0 J a) a) m -
UU U +.+ O_ 0 O. 0 0 0 0 —° E
My
L .d
fa L fV
cu
cu
cu
V
o
0 3
> °
0 Ln o 4J Q 0 E .o L
4-J L ca
In OU U_ �a 'n to Q ON On
'L Q' ° V N E L Q r
m � O N
O L� O O Q > p
ca O O U +J N (a > c E 4-J Q a
on E a o Ln Q) c `� C o u CL cn on
T CU 4-J lz a� -0
o oN o E ca ov J �
� on a� � +�CD-
Ln *10 0 CU a)o 0 E c p 4-J c p Q ca CU cq
CL m ca On •� L L U +-+ E E L N Q ca
ca O N fa U L CL N Q
QJ N M � aQJ 0 4.J E O O E 4.J OO
N N cu O- ate.+ � U N ate+ a + > aOJ U N p
x � °- °--° � ' � � � o ao � � E 0LEN CU
On 4-J C14
_ 3 a
r � N "O N N -0 � N � N c
pA +J
c�a � �
LL- CL a monU � � oO Ln
-v N 1 N 'X � °+-+' °- ca N O N
N fa a.J L N fa Q"O ca ca O- > L ca > >
E � o �, o � � caQ) > a� � > � Ea� a� > oo �
L = Q a� a � E W to ca w u .� o a w ono .�
,.Joop O +J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
L N N
O p O
NN E
E
r 4.J L L
On
N ° a 3 a� 3 � Q
L o � on 4-J
u o N
,� on c �J +J Q
ca 'L, x L u p Q
U N ate.+ N a-J i ca o
U > >% 4-J x Q E L
N
N
N N- O O O u E U .0
� °- c " E au °- j,a
N U O .O j > O0 +>+ onN
M (a N N U -0 j
O N U N 7
>
0 N O L �L.+ ° O Q Q
N cu
ca cn . ca ca N N x CO +-+
3 Cd Q W W- a� J W "a
O
L
fV N M
O ca ca ca
O L7 cu cu cu
0
O _
O on O o Q) .E
u ro E o ° -v E 3 cn � > 00
U E O C
an C:C O N ~ y '^ 4, u
fo N L a•:+ O > N N 3
O L 0 fo > C Ln N `� Z N Q y Ln
O coo
L O c a- O �_ aO co U N +.+
p O ^ N o N 3 a > U N Q �n C Ln
E N C N
N 0 > o 1- O >, C c o \ > x c CO u m .4 X an
N C " I� N o -b .- 'n C C X X o 4. N N co
O >+
O a) O N c 4, >, c c 4. .� c o w a�
4-j 4-J 4-J c U O C "O'v 'c6 a) ro c6 O n I c6 4; N -p J
cu 0 co E un -o Q) o a c u E c w an
c a
N "O W °' �n � O O a�i ° � a in aoi c u c"oo ro +, E a; a� co O
U u u on c oiii Ji cNo °' a o c cN acu
O O N E Q) > " O o a u N OJ OJ � O a a� .� a� U O a N cu CL_j
� � O a� EJ +
on O O t o o u c E Ji N u o a
Q) c 0 a c o a
L ; �' N "O U on`� U N fo U +� CL � � to N O N N a) '� � o O .� J � o a°n p � �
cu '� p 4; a > Q,� o p � N in�' in > o p H N C on O C R +, U � O
~ X - O_ o o W o N a o N " E 7: � � � � in c W e � .� u a o o O O U
on N O t > c a a� o a� a� co ai c . u u o 4� a� u
N N c U c c-
c > o co co on o
O U ,�_ 0 a-+ 'V ( C LJ � b!I Q)� (>� C L (� a L Ln O i 0 a C N ,� �-
J ^ _ L U ro C Q co > > O in N .0 •X L iii 7 J E +.+ o cn
.-. O L ro O N C Q � O 4• coo O N W U 0 N O > L ro
N O O N o o a •0 N +10 H ro N � p N � N 3 p U � E � N � N U N + � N i
co O +�+ LM 4- 00 0 c�'o cao N Ln O a 7 U vNi +1-+ .N N N E '� o O an N - 1 0 +'
O o°0 ° r ' O E c N + N o ro'� -a Q) •3 - o o o �
L �o O •� N O .. N c O O cn cn Q +� i +� +, +, L N ro s- +, ro O N +, cn +,
O LPG U N � aL� J � U u2Q w � Z aZ Sin cnU a� min � N 3o cnW cn
4-.+ 00 p " -0 U U o 0 0 o +
U 0.+ o 0 0 ❑ U U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O N N c6
= N ON -
Ovii 4`�'
CL cn a N On
co
U- a + U iJ
O cif
U clr� N
+J o cn 0 3 .o
U c N "0 0 N O
u > O t .- � a
U c U J a i U +•+ -p cn
N ro 0 N 4-J �- � y c 4-
oO N .,—% N N ++ O U U N
cu cu
Q N U O OU H e C y U
u u 0 N 3 N O
U c +, o c vi }+ o � +' r �
c� o o E u O c �
N > N .0 U Li U 4- N O u N
L U U U a•:+ ro a� y 7
N 'y ro C 'E a ,ro +.+ 0- -p -� N O C
a- N
a c O co a� E a) c won N
`o � >
U ii ` O D D vii U Z U 2 2 �E Q)H O H N
4-d W o ❑ ❑ W U 4-- W . o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
N
W
M
CU CU
0
E
L f6 N f6 N
cu
=; cu
c on c on
L L
On (a O m O
� L L
J Q Q
� N 4 N 4
m N N
Q Q
> E W
}r 00 p o 0 0 0
O O N
L N
N
O Q Q
� a O O
E
LL-
0 O O
U G G
E E
U E E
O O
u U U
O O
L Q Q
Q) cal
M
W d
4-d 4-d
cu cu
cu cu
Q N Q N
E O E 0
N M
L L
O
0
4
N E
Q) 0 N }, Q Li d O O
O
O
E In
to ° O 4- U N (6 N O O
U In 4-J U L In In
� _ � � L � U �a �a
E O " (z u � � a U O � 4 o � 4-J
`" cn .0 o 4-J N N � N �
o N u H vi O "O cn cn On
f6 O
On C .� o C L N (14 a"J �O
0 .2 U N
CL _ 7� O 0--cc r C-4
(a 2 L f6 N i i U 1_ O J N N f6 N f6 f6 N f6
N 4J -0 u a .� E -p O O f6 O c_ ++ ate'+
-0 a co03z a; a aoOn EE COn ^ Con
on O � o 4 C C C Q-O -p L � L f6 O U f6 O U
-v N Eo a�i a�i a�i a�i `" E E O N ° ,0, cc E° ,0,
oo � u � ENoO -0 o - o ago aMo
� E � � c Eui E o 0 0 0 . ❑ u E � � > -0 EwU EwU
4-.r 00 C U U J d U o o 0 0 0 0 0 0
L fV a..r
L C14 "p
_ L
O N� U N N O O
O N 0
N N
v� o Q L -v 4-J Q) � 0 ++
E E� a � J � c
ca ca ° — O O 4-J D O p a-
LL- x N =;
U U
E � E N N O O O
U U E ru
U L o N
N N N N O m N OL
00 > -p 0 Q-0 m
N 0 N N
-0
U N J N OA m O m m
N
C- C U
D OA (a > 4
E J c UN U
u N O � O �N
O-0 0 � U +J
O O E N °' 4-J E cu E cu
U N 4•:+ L U -0 U •N Q Q Q
CL W fO E w -0 u
E
,� N M
L
L L L
U
L �
E �, o
o aJ Q
C Q on
o a
E
N > }' U > Q Q
OL E U > N in
a_ 0 u >+ O- O \ 0 �f6
Ln N
N W ++ W ++
WN "E 0 \ ^�, u ate-J 76
41 c C� U 7 � H N J C" O NU U Uin N"O N"O
N iz > N o Q U 'i f6 r f6 f6
Q O > \ Q L to to
N 4-J Q O O N O- N c L N
p C H Q N Q m O N OU "c 0 On 0 On
On On > f6
N N LO J "p O N N O f6 O f6 O
J C H O N N E Z > � N O- CL
4- 3 vii O N 0= N OU O N 4-J N � E �
�' Eo t EO O 4-J Ckn 4-J
= u Uc.� u0 O � � ww Ew Ew
H d O — —
4-, 00 p o 0 o U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O N
L N 0
t/1 O O L
0 �O •� E 0 O O O
C) CL E u 0 E E
Ln
E on on
E `` N N O O
U > U on E a a
N N �r_: ( N N
"O N N
> U w w
O" U +V) i U �'"7 f6 N 76 N 4-J 0
m E
O N c 0- +0+ U N O 0
N N
4-J O = +.+ CL N N N N N
to On
Q N v c N L 0 0 EO -.U:; 7 C 7 C
Q V o f NO Q `� p Q �
E 0" N U X N in 4-J 4-J '-p � 4 O 4' O
U 4O o N 4-J to 0 0 .N 0 .N
L E >1 (a o E u E `� E E � E �
i6 0 u a a� a� a� a� E a� E
p (6 > +•r U a a E a E
w o o . LU o N E as Eu Eu
L N M
Vi �
E L
�O o a On
C) cn O
N U Q
L N c
L U
L
N E T c On ctf 4J
U cu CL
E o a m ca m O
�
N � � � L �
o 0 a �
a� a�
O- N N -J ca ° '0 0 m cu
U L L
O U 0 O N N N 0 Q Q O
C 7 m "O "O L4-J U U U O- L N N
E Q 4-J 4-J U CU N N N O 4; E N
f6 'n'n'n to W
On � Ln O � NM f6L W O O NIA
E O > L L L 4-d cu O
J •O_ •O_ L u •F •O_ E O 0 U L
cu cu cu� E E � � � E E � Q Qr �
m 0 = 3 0 0 0Q) -v E E (a O
E O O U on " 7 O N O O U
L u u0 < o u 0 umo
Hj:j- � On
}, m0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N
O O �_
L N U
on O '� N c
° a 4 -v E
E L O u
O N N 7
U `,I c 4-' -p
>, j � +�+
V +- O' N
u E
U m Z; f6 N O O +Ln +N+
N N O O- O U U
E 0 Qc OL "O d' O O a- C
N O- "O N N
O E Q N L L
a"+ LM L f6 f6
0 � CNN
J � O c O cn U O m E
N � in + , N 4 N
� (z - ,u QU cL N N
E ca a°' o `� a� a�
m E E O D U in > > U a a
N
w
Lm ° -0 o 0 0 0 °' o f E E
L
N
f6 f6 M
L
+J
Ln N N m
N
*�-' � >+ O OUO O
N = On"O N J 4-J
N E O O ,O„ U 4-J cn
N ro � O N p
N f6 O N O U
.o E fa E u H fa •� 4-J O
O N LO c U
U c6 i O
=; a-J O a-J Q CU CU
0 U Q.0 "0 f6
O N i -p u E J
~ � �
f6 C7 N C ate-.+ -p
f6 N U U �
N D O a an -p 3 � Q u on N
cn ca J c c c •� O
L N a , a-J o 0 7 N f6 O a•.+ C vi Q J
N c
H N N c -p •N L J
o U Zp
On E J - cu
O' m 0� O
O U L
on c
++ On N N N
(n C to N cub N N f6 4-J N L
ca O W W 'E E E ca o u _ a.J
J E N pap cN6 N L CO •� -0 -6 U i6
O U O u m L H -N On O
4-J 00 Q N Q o . U .- ❑ ❑ ❑
O O N
N fV N J N
_ L
p 7 vii 4-J N U
cu
in O Q u U N cu
in fV Q 7 O U N Q 0
L L c E -- N O
N
Lei Ln �" c CL— •> N
u c Q) o aEo Cu E
O c � E
N on-a C U
U N O- O c N O U
L
E > -a ANN E
U c6 z; c f6 L 4-J U 7 N aU-+
on U m N U N m —
m O �, O 4-+ u a -v
OJ N
N N O N N
o N (0 -0 EOM
Lv On on L C7 N O O Ln
L O C 'E > a•.+ Q
r (a 4-J ^ E
O On N
U
O U C N Q E
-0
.onV 4-J a
• i
7
L �
N � O -0 3:
U �' E m -0a-a ca m
O
M On
N
L Cd
L fV H
Z
Q In r
O ti
�O O U O ateJ
O U M U
C14 cu
Lm 0
O N C' a) O
a) on a CL
O U � a) >'
0 N cu o On
cu .�
ca 0 a m O
Na) o > � a) °" o
�, +� a) `. > U +�
is a)
ca o o a)
a) N 4-J U O a'o a
On CL m CL 0
L C c -i� U
O Ln 4; O U O
-O N H W N N
fa O E o 0 0 0 � U
U U 3 to
H �
4-, 00 O 4-,
L fV 0
O O N
N ('4 � a) on
O Q ++ N
� a E � 0
E �
00 Cd
O OA
U C07
Ucv � 4-J
Ln
L a) 3
c(aa u c c a) �
cu cu
m N 0 O a)
EQ „�
N O
tLa D N o� on a
c
cu
O cn O N
N N
U Q
� O �
0 > •Q oA
U u co
L N M
(a L L
u $
_
Ln
/
)
7
&
E § /
/%
/ \
S $ 3 \ Ln
= � \ q
O > S <
2 \ \ u
q
U Ln 0 0 $ / f g CL
§ $ J2 CL CL
Ln
\ o U ` 0 \
On 2 0 t o o § j §
0 \ c c 2 / § \
o ) o E / k
\ o <
% u U CL / § ± 4-J
= r o ' Q ± 2 C
E E o & � E & & & CL
Q) 2 Ln 0 2 2 r > E o 0 o E
4-J 00 o L/) R , o u u
0 � q O
Ln ,
0 Q)
4 m o
§ w
§
0 /
�
u - > 7 CL
0
cu L-
u o a
� ƒ §
2 > E .
CL
4-J E
E
U � � �
Q)
CL
E
2 \ >
U q o
C'4 q
0 § §
� �
U
N
E L
c � cu
O L >%
4J O ;
N On �
f6 a 7 �O L
f6 O
V �6 L
�i
O U N O
or
Q O O
On N O
J < o
4-J LU
N 76 J N
E U C ° N f6
H � � O L ca °o U N
rq
4-J 00 O CT N 00 OO U O N L N Q
L N f6
Ln O Ln o u
or On
O � � SON O O ^ U N
a
NO Q " te N � � L 0 o
0 0 H
Q O ^ On
LL- Li r E U U O p
i� ++ O a•.+ .-.
E 7� 7 f6 �_ f6 4-J to ++
OA L in
U a N c f6 � :� �_f6
0 4c-j E 4-J N f6 a r O LU
u a E '°' o E o o -° o
au +� ° � ,J o cu o � u � cu a Ln 4-J
N M '� Ln to N N L to "O L
�% L .� N � O t/} OA t/} 0 0 +-+ O N O
U N on 4-J N to O N c > O L O
L U to U -p O O "O N p ++ O
Q) m c6 ate+ .-.00 � � m N O O E v O
OA to y�} O- V} On U Ln
�_ N O L7 L On N O I�
N "p OO t/}
L L ° �7 O On� -- � On
0 p J 00 c6 N 7 L N =.c �, O N
co o O O v -O 4-J O O N O au X
4-J On L N to
"O O O N N
V ° O o•U L V �'Q +� -v L N On Z
a�
Q ° N � O v N cLa 0 � :v
Q) on
O N cV N 4-J N CL CL N E 7 N L[� 'Q > O- 7 7
N � � N d' �, � On Co Li a- � cl +� � L m m
c,� L �_ `. ca N cLa E
0 0 0 0
on 0 o 0 0 o N
U o 0
O O 7 O N N
0 o' Q m m a <i, � o m u
N
E
cu
Lm m
L >
O
cu
L
N
O >%
c� 3 o
CD-
cu
c � -o° E
N
c 4-+
#i C w
O
On (14 O N O O E
4-J Ln
N
N t/} p N p N
a a
Ln
"p r', on O 00 C) p U N C) C:) p ++LOp > p
L 7 ++ L Opp O �, U
N u i c0 L O V} c -O U 600 "E
N > ,D N ate+ }' a) 0 L C) U a)
N >' a) a) c0 O -,O +� >
D `O V'r N N 7 on t/} a)
CU
U 0 L c0 a) N M U 4-J 4-J 0 cn N a) on N p c0
L cu a) E `" on M M E O N p p
U +.+ Q)
C) fa O "O u O O �O Ln cu Ln p0
u Ln C) cu on(a O Q L � a) U p >% ,n a) M
m L N 3 a) +J p M L `� a) p U on
i � 0 N N N 0 �' � -v -v pp
w +� i U N E '
M u u o � � a) C a' � � E , E � 00 � aC Ln
ro ,nc03N oa Ln 4-J a u � � >..o4, � N
� oNNME HQ� NCU " aoo "' � �
a) 2 U W W H4-J > a ca � 4-J o Q) -Z Ln � o o
�%0 c on a) N 7 N U N 4 >% c a Ln E- u cU6
-O "O cn O Ln O C 4' W > U a on Ln 4-, n p E c6 >
N L U a) ++ Opp 0 f6
=; =;a•.7 a) H — a , Ede 0 (n
L L a•.+ p p U p f6 a) � a-.+ O a-.+ L L H U m
Q) caoo � � o � � }, N LN L 3 CF a� O E r- 4-J
tin c0 m -p co p c -C a) d >, E a) (o ca > +.+ L (o C U
N Q 00 p o M • on± L In a) -C C N O O L
D a) ON cV p L a) p a) a) O 4, 7
Ln � act/)— LZ � Ln o- QUcU Q �nU � a
M O
40 40
U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O o!
L U
>' O O O
> 00 -0 on
3 0 c
O N
i
U Z 4-J 7
4
On c
O 0 N
N L 0 U
O H `�
U U O
On
C
c6
c On
0 4-; f6 c
L O
L
N is u
a� u c E Q)
on > a o
c V) .^ 0 m
J i p L c
O 0 ^
i 0 c N
N 'D O N �. X
Q N `� on
E to L 0 c
N O C .— O N
�
C4 c
N O O on O 0 j ,,=-; ca
Ln 4-J
_ ro V) C)
0 -p J L t}'n U N a••+
N D a 0 N D U p
c6 0 "O Ln N O L a••+
E E O d Z U u � N
O N 0 N N r LL. E
M O L N
V O N N u Z U
7 >+
U 0 >% E 'v N Q 0 on;� E O" N
E Ln o O U O ^ ^ 0 O U u 4
E O O
WL i Q 3 m 00 00 LM U Cr.—
to M O Q cn a r O L U U N
N y�} C> i� U p O Ln N Q on U m
c6 L M to ^ r U N
U +
U •+ co 0 N U C O 0 OZ � � ++ 4-
0 O � t6 0 0_ L OLD N E O U }; �
a }' U 0 \ on E U Lf) `� on in >+ O Q
O N 0 � �Ln � � to N 4:5
E N .i Q v} U N 0 t/? N N O
L N U NO t; Uj �} L U O "O w Cd \
+� U c � a) � � a °' 3 a' CLUMua ❑
O M 0 0 L N i U
M U ❑ ❑ ❑ U N N_
L ❑ ❑ �
�-,
O
76 � U }' O O
0 > H > C7 J H 0
cn
0
+J
4-J
4-J N
� Lm
CL
O
U L
c 7
O
U
+.+
O U U 7
U p N U
N
N N N ~ cal
E
On CL 20
c O O U
J z -0 O
> U
N C)
L
O L O
_ O N 4-J
cu On CD fa
4--J 00 O vi t/} L O O N
O O N "O +' U U � U
N N ON m 7 7 0
7
in O Q -0 m c6 c6
N C14 Q N O f6
w
E i U
E O
O U L E E is
U 0 O " " C
00 C 0 U U N
O .�-: .�-: E .�
U O O d N'i-7 Q)
O O U L L L a..r
L
CL
N tN/? 4-J U U f6
pOp f6 Q +-J U
O O O
d L U U U 4-J N
N L O O N m ^
O 4-J Om U QQm L
m U D *z; C-4 C-4 C-4 = Q
O 0 N
L O N M �}
L N ++ m f6 f6 f6 to
U or
N m pn i O U
W N N N N O
�
m N O N U U U
O E -0 N
U aon 2li
3 -O 0.
o � c O L
0 0 0 0 0
U
0 O "O D m
O O
L7 0 0 o L7
J W
Z O
Z Z ; N
Z LU
a �
❑ ❑ ❑
o �
w E 4-' cEa
LL- U N
7 � N � �
ckn L O
O L C L E O
O "� 4 N zr 'in
L O �' EN cu CD- 000
OCD 000 0 Ln
E O V} u v}v}v} v}v}v} Ln
Lm
H 4-J
on 'E
O
J L
O
Q. >+>+
ca p w o E .v
E N N u L
L 7 H Q C-
f6 N
� a � z u � � E
> °'
}, mo o C � E
O C
Q) cal
L _; E
O O N N L 0 z; *U Ou
L fV -O f6 N O- u 0 0 0
N +m+ u L O 00 O-OcV00
0 •� Q LC) c C14 M
N O V?V? V?V?V, Ln
.N O Q E � O Lr)rl
i/} i/} ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ i/}
E LL. u On
O
u O
CL 0
U N a-.+ Q U E
N 4-J M . .
(a L L O N O NO N flu
m a O �, O O" E � L N u L O
�+ N N L N N 6 Ln
on on 0
•> O •V L L N H
or c
u u on;� ca a Q) Q) u N u U
m � °Q
vu w (a m EE �
LL- _
x O
G Q
L
u N M M M
.... .... .... .... ....
QN .-. .-. .-. .-. .-.
N cal
2
70- J f6
O
C7 N N N N N d
MEMORANDUM
r
TO: Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM: Environmental Services Department
THROUGH: Donald B. Cooper, City Manager
DATE: April 3,2015
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM WS.2.-SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF APRIL 14,2015
DISCUSSION REGARDING NO LEFT HAND TURNS ALONG ATLANTIC AVENUE
BACKGROUND
City Staff was tasked to investigate the new traffic pattern that would result if Commission approved no
left turns (east and west bound) for vehicles on Atlantic Ave. between NE 1St Ave. and NE 4th Ave.
On June 28, 1993, the topic of no left turns on Atlantic Avenue was brought to the attention of the
Planning and Zoning Board for discussion (if necessary, this information will be presented to the
Commission during a work session). At that time, an engineering analysis was conducted and a staff
report was created. The report was provided to the Planning and Zoning Board, the Community
Revedevelopment Agency, the Joint Venture, and the Parking Management Team. The conclusion of
the report is, "Nothing be done i.e. the current, present situation is that which is desired". There should
be no changes to the current situation which accommodates left turns with the exceptions in the vicinity
of the FEC Railway Crossing.
Over twenty years have passed since the original report was written and the City of Delray Beach has
changed significantly in the downtown corridor. The downtown corridor has significantly increased in
the following areas: commercial and residential development, residents, and vehicular traffic. All of
these activities are resulting in increased congestion of roadway and pedestrian traffic in the downtown
area and adding to the frustration level of the general public. Therefore, the traffic study on Atlantic
Avenue should be re-analyzed and alternative solutions can be re-considered.
The Environmental Services Department shall present to the City Commission a newly created traffic
pattern analyzing the results of the implementation of no left turns (east and west bound) on Atlantic
Avenue between NE 1St Avenue and NE 4th Avenue for your discussions, comments, and
recommendations.
Attachments:
1) 1993 Planning and Zoning Memorandum
2) Atlantic Avenue Vehicular Traffic Pattern(2015,proposed)
3) Atlantic Avenue Parking Nodes and Landscaping Areas (2015)
4) Atlantic Avenue Pedestrian Traffic Pattern(2015,proposed)
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO: VID HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
V-GD U a/-I,
FROM: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JUNE 28, 1993
SUBJECT: LEFT TURN RESTRICTIONS ON ATLANTIC AVENUE CBD
Prior to Commissioner Mouw leaving the City Commission, he
raised the subject of left turn restrictions on Atlantic Avenue.
It was his position that such restrictions were supposed to have
been imposed. There was some differing opinions on the
Commission; and the matter- wa=s---referred to staff for a thorough
review.
Attached is a staff report which provides that review. The
report has been provided to the Planning and Zoning Board, the
CRA and the Joint Venture. By copy of this memo it is also
provided to the Parking Management Team.
The conclusion of the report is that nothing be done i .e. the
current, present situation is that which is desired. Attached
is correspondence from the Chamber of Commerce which supports
that position. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the
report on June 21st and endorsed its conclusions .
Please distribute this memorandum and the attached report to the
City Commission. If necessary, we will present this information
at a worksession to the Commission.
DJK/dlm
Attachment:
* P&Z Staff Report of June 21, 1993
c: (memo only)
dreg Luttrell City Traffic Engineer
Chris Brown, Director, CRA
Bill Wood, Chamber of Commerce
Majorie Ferrer, Joint Venture , � 7� ���
PLANNIN & "` N f
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF: JUNE 21, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: V.A. Review of Report
Left Turns on Atlantic .Avenue
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD:
The item before the Board is that of review and the making
of a, recommendation on a report dealing with the subject of
left turn restrictions on E. Atlantic Avenue.
BACKGROUND:
The subject of restricting left turn movements, on Atlantic
Avenue, within the downtown area is frequently a topic of
discussion. Most recently, a Commissioner asked for a concise
report and resolution of the subject.
To that end, the attached report has been prepared by Greg
Luttrell, the City' s Traffic Engineer. This report is being
provided to the Planning and Zoning 'Board, the CRA, and the
Parking Management Team (PMT) for review, comment, and
recommendations . All recommendations will be forwarded to the
City Commission.
ANALYSIS :
The report is comprehensive and self-explanatory. Its
conclusion is that there should be no changes to the current
situation which accommodates left turns with the exceptions in
vicinity of the FEC Railway Crossing.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, find the report to acceptable and endorse its summary
and recommendations .
Attachments :
* Memorandum Report dated June 2, 1993, by Greg Luttrell
Report prepared by: David J. Kovacs, June 17 , 1993
ti
f
D 3K/P Z LE FT_DOC
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVID J. KOVACS'
DIRECTOR ,5 ,,�� , "
V
FROM: GREG LUTTRELL JUjNj. 3 1993
TRAFFIC ENGINEER
DATE: JUNE 2, 1993 P 1�-AN` °Nam & -Z.0 ° LNG
SUBJECT: LEFT TURNS ON EAST ATLANTIC AVENUE
INTERSECTIONS OF EAST 1ST, 2ND, 3RD, 4TH AVENUES
The following report has been prepared per your directions . This
report shows a history of the left turn issue from 1989 to the
present . It then goes on to try and identify the `problem' and
possible solutions . Finally, recommendations are made regarding the
issue of left turns on East Atlantic Avenue.
Note that the left turn issue involved only left turns for east and
westbound traffic .
HISTORY:
This section of the report lists chronologically, the available
correspondences pertaining to the left turn restrictions on East
Atlantic Avenue, specifically the intersections of lst, 2nd, 3rd,
and 4th Avenues .
April 7 , 1989 - County traffic Division releases $800 . 00 to the
Atlantic Avenue signal contractor. These funds were to accommodate
installation of NO LEFT TURN signs at the East 1st and 4th Avenue
intersections .
Restricted Not Restricted
1st, 4th 2nd, 3rd
June 5, 1989 - Final inspection for new traffic signals on East
Atlantic at East 2nd and 3rd Avenues . Representatives from the City
(John Walker) , the FDOT and the contractor were present. FDOT
instructed instructed the contractor to install NO LEFT TURN signs
at both intersections .
Restricted Not Restricted
lst, 2nd, 3rd, 4th none
August 31, 1989 - Letter from the County Traffic Division to the
City Engineer (Gates Castle) . City requested that the existing NO
LEFT TURN signs at the East lst Avenue intersection be removed.
This letter from the County confirms that these signs will be
removed. This letter was copied to the DDA (Frank Spence) .
County Traffic Division work order records show that removal of
these signs was completed on November 30, 1989 .
Restricted Not Restricted
2nd, 3rd, 4th 1st
Apparently, subsequently, the NO LEFT TURN signs were removed at the
2nd and 4th Avenue intersections .
February 23, 1990 - Letter from the City (Kathy Deardon) to the
County Traffic Division requesting "as soon as possible" the
installation of NO LEFT TURN signs at the East 1st, 2nd, and 4th
Avenue intersections . Letter was copied to the City Engineer (Gates
Castle) .
March 8, 1990 - City Engineer, Gates Castle, receives a copy of a
letter from the County Traffic Division to a signal contractor. The
letter authorizes the contractor to install NO LEFT TURN signs .
This is an addition to the FDOT signal mast arm contract. Price for
each installed sign is $200 . 00 .
County Traffic Division work order records indicate that
installation of these signs was completed on March 9, 1990 .
Restricted Not Restricted
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th none
March 8, 1990 - Memorandum from Kathy Deardon to the City Engineer,
Gates Castle. "With the latest No Left Turn Restrictions imposed on
Atlantic Avenue it would be also appropriate to restrict left turns
for eastbound vehicles turning onto Railroad Avenue. . . The Police
Department brought this to my attention. " The City Engineer
approved this action on March 9, 1990 .
April 4, 1990 - Letter from City Engineer, Gates Castle, to the
County Traffic Division. "At their April 3rd Workshop, the City
Commission decided to remove the left turn restrictions at the
subject intersections . " The intersections referred to were East
lst, 2nd and 4th Avenues . Letter was copied to Bob Barcinski .
County traffic Division work order records indicate that this
request was completed on April 10, 1990 .
Restricted Not Restricted
3rd 1st, 2nd, 4th
Apparently, subsequently, the NO LEFT TURN signs were removed at the
3rd Avenue intersection.
Restricted Not Restricted
none 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
June, 1992 - The Downtown Master Parking Plan addresses the left
turn issue in item TE. 4 . "Traffic must stop when vehicles wait to
make left turns from Atlantic Avenue to these roadways because left
turn lanes are not provided. " The Plan then goes on to state that a
reconsideration of the left turn restrictions "is warranted" . The
Plan then outlines specific recommendations dealing with the Swinton
Avenue intersection and the NE 2nd Avenue intersection.
December 8, 1992 - City Commission minutes (agenda item 11 .A. 3 . )
"In response to Mr. Marshall ' s comments with regard to the left
turns on Atlantic Avenue, the City Manager responded that the City
had left turn restrictions in place at one time. They were removed
because of the problems they caused. . .staff would not recommend any
change back to prohibiting left turns on Atlantic . "
February 2 , 1993 - Left turn issue raised during Commission
workshop. Many differing viewpoints were raised as to what had been
the last ' resolution' of this matter.
February 8, 1993 - David Kovacs directs Traffic Engineer to "begin a
formal history and review of past considerations, and to look at
alternatives which may exist" , relative to the 'problem' relative to
the left turns on East Atlantic Avenue.
February 8, 1993 - Letter from the City Manager, David Harden, to
the DDA Chairman, Mike Listick. The letter refers to this issue
being part of the Downtown Master Parking Plan, but, that staff was
looking into its history. Letter copied to the CRA Director, Chris
Brown.
February 10, 1993 - Memo from Traffic Engineer to the DDA, CRA,
Chamber of Commerce, and AAA, requesting a definition of the
'problem' and official agency position.
March 1, 1993 - Letter from the DDA Chairman, Mike Listick, to David
Kovacs discussing left turns along East Atlantic. "In fact, the DDA
strongly opposes eliminating any left turns . " The letter goes on to
point out that the DDA concern dealt with the delays for westbound
motorists at the Swinton Avenue intersection.
In response to the DDA letter, David Kovacs responded with the
following (reference letter dated March 3, 1990) . "The request
re-examining the matter was raised by Commissioner Mouw during a
recent City Commission Workshop. Also, we have had other inquiries
about the subject. In order to 'conclusively' put the matter to
rest, it is appropriate that we provide a comprehensive memo
regarding past actions and positions . Your comments about strongly
opposing the elimination of any left turns will be noted. "
March 25, 1993 - Letter from the Chamber stating their ' official '
position regarding left turns on the Avenue (attached) .
"The Chamber believes that cars waiting to make left turns do
not substantially delay traffic flows along Atlantic Avenue.
Further, if left turns were restricted, businesses on the North
and South Avenues would be negatively impacted by the
restricted access . Therefore, no change should be made at this
time.
The Committee feels that the one-way pairs will facilitate
those motorists seeking a quicker route. "
The Atlantic Avenue Association has indicated written support for
the above Chamber of Commerce position.
April 2 , 1993 - Letter form the Chairman of the Joint Venture to
David Kovacs . The letter concludes that "The Joint Venture strongly
opposes eliminating any left hand turns . . . Therefore, no change
should be made at this time. "
DEFINING THE "PROBLEM!" :
The above historical perspective gives the impression that a clear
problem has not been identified, and agreed to, which could then be
solved. This section of the report attempts to identify a problem
and justify it through support information.
SAFETY - 'There is a high number of traffic accidents involving
left turning vehicles . '
A review of the accident summary reports for the one year period of
November, 1991 - October, 1992, yielded the following.
East 1st Avenue -- 2 rear end collisions and 1 collision with a
parked vehicle, near the intersection. Probable causes not
related to left turning vehicles .
East 2nd Avenue - 1 vehicle hit utility pole, 1 rear end
collision, and 1 collision with a parked vehicle, near the
intersection. Probable causes not related to left turning
vehicles . 1 Angle type collision December 10, 1991 . This
accident occurred 100 feet west of the intersection thereby
discounting its possible relationship to left turns at the
intersection.
East 3rd Avenue - 1 collision with a tree/shrubbery. Probable
cause not related to left turning vehicles .
East 4th Avenue - 1 rear end collision. Probable cause not
related to left turning vehicles .
This review shows that the left turns at these four East Atlantic
Avenue intersection do not constitute a safety hazard and should not
be considered as part of the 'problem' .
DELAY - 'The left turning vehicles create too much delay to others
travelling on East Atlantic Avenue. '
There are two items which should be considered when defining delay
as the ' problem' . These deal with an analysis of delay as defined
through an engineering examination, and then an examination of the
perception of delay. This first analysis deals with the actual
amount of left turning vehicles and their likely impact on the
traffic stream. Traffic count data indicates that from 2-8 percent
of the east/west traffic stream makes left turns . This relatively
small percentage of traffic should create a correspondingly small
amount of disruption to other traffic considering that this road is
not designed to function as a through artery.
The above consideration of delay as the 'problem' fails when the
statement given by the Chamber of Commerce with regards to the
possible restriction of left turns is examined.
"The Chamber believes that cars waiting to make left turns do
not substantially delay traffic flows along Atlantic Avenue.
The Committee feels that the one-way pairs will facilitate
those motorists seeking a quicker route. "
This statement shows that alternatives exist for those motorists who
feel that an excessive delay does exist. It is apparent by this
statement that any delays caused by left turning vehicles should not
be considered excessive.
The concept of excessive delay should therefore not be considered
the 'problem' .
SOLUTIONS TO THE 'PROBLEM' :
In light of the above discussion of what the 'problem' may be, it
would seem unnecessary to outlining possible solutions . This is
presented only with respect to possible actions should a 'problem'
be defined and need solving.
Option 1 - Left turn prohibition
This has been tried, removed, tried again and removed again.
Without a clear problem which could be addressed through left
turn prohibitions, these actions are strongly not recommended.
Option 2 - Construct left turn lanes
During the creation of our downtown streetscape, this
possibility was discussed, and ultimately, decided against.
Creation of new left turn lanes would require the removal of
part of the intersection nodes on Atlantic Avenue, removal of
part, or possible all, of the on-street parking, and relocation
of trees, signs, decorative street lights and both above and
underground utilities . Construction impacts would be of a
similar scope to those felt during the last streetscape project
(ie : street closures, sidewalk removals, utility disruptions) .
And, costs for this type of project are not currently shown in
the City' s capital budgets .
Again, this is an alternative/solution which is meant to
address a specific type of traffic problem, not currently found
on East Atlantic Avenue.
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS:
The above report begins with a history from 1989 to the present on
the left turn issue. The City has restricted and then allowed left
turns along East Atlantic Avenue. These actions have not ultimately
addressed the 'problem' as no clear issue has been identified that
needs solving.
The identification of a 'problem' with the left turns on East
Atlantic Avenue could not be done. There continues to be a few
gripes, questions, and complaints regarding these left turns . These
should be expected, as the streetscape now in place does not address
all of the needs of everyone who might travel this road. This was
not the goal of our downtown beautification.
During the design and construction of the East Atlantic Avenue
beautification (or streetscape) project, many possibilities were
presented, discussed, discarded, and acted upon. One of these was
that the pedestrian environment, landscaping, and intersection node
configurations was more important than providing left turn lanes .
With that decision came both positive and negative outcomes . The
temporary inconvenience caused by a left turning vehicle is a
negative. As long as these temporary inconveniences are kept in
context of our downtown efforts, all is well .
One final note should be presented. In some instances when the
' issue ' of left turns (and their restriction) is discussed, the
intersection being referred to is Swinton/ Atlantic Avenues . This
report does not address this intersection as it is not part of the
'problem' presented here. This report concentrates only on the
intersection left turns at East Atlantic and East 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and
4th Avenues .
Attachment
C : Kevin Egan, CRA
Mike Listick, DDA
Bill Wood, Chamber of Commerce
Marjorie Ferrer, DJV
T: \ADVANCED\EAALEFT
GREATER
DEL RAY BEACH
Chamber of Commerce
March 25, 1993
David Kovacs, Director
Department of Planning and Zoning
City of Delray Beach
100 N.W. 1st Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Reference: Your letter of February 8, 1993, regarding left
turns along East Atlantic Avenue
Dear David:
The Chamber of Commerce takes the following position regarding left
turns along East Atlantic Avenue:
The Chamber believes that cars waiting to make left turns do
not substantially delay traffic flow along Atlantic Avenue.
Further, if left turns were restricted, businesses on the
North and South Avenues would be negatively impacted by
restricted access . Therefore, no change should be made at this
time .
The committee feels that the one-way pairs will facilitate those
motorists seeking a quicker route. Please call me if I can answer
any questions about how we arrived at our position.
Sincerely,
William J. Wood
cc: Greg Luttrell
64 SOUTHEAST FIFTH AVENUE • DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33483
407/278-0424 FAX 407 /278-0555
Chamber Accredited by united States Chamber of Commerce
El
3aVnos WIVd
0j4�'4
3AV H1L 3S ® 3-.AV Hi--Z 35
Fc
s� �a
9 8 fi
El
�.9
0 ❑ 4
3�V H19 3S AMH�lVa3033 ® a a 3�V H19 1 a a
a _� _� o
w
4 ®
G
0 0 4
0 b ® �
1.AMHlVa3033 p ® p 3hV H1S 3S
�V p
® p 3 H1S 3N _
cn ® 444
IiI
4 cn y Q a 2
Ld u 0-
Q cn
•w � .�,6 0) ire
Z 4
� .
3AV Hit 3N .— f w anV Hlb 3Sw
cn
�p 0 w 44
® U U
Q
a f Ld ~ V Oas
U
4
€� n cn w
U
W
w Q U ❑
1Z f a f
—3AV ONZ 3N y ~ a '~ 3AV ONZ 3S— p
.'s g p 5 cny
8 W
f cn
Ld
f U rn 4
Q
3AV 1SL 3S
3AV 1S 3N
41 Ld
U N
0 ❑ E1j w
cn
O Z'^ 00 ❑
iL
4 + 0 44
4
o� NOR
3AV NOINIMS N NOINIMS S
IF
1 a
bbbf 444 � 4f
0 o J
3AV 1SL MN �► 3AV lSL MS 0
4 LA
El
3avnos WIVd
o'w �
Eg EEF
a ® Sa
3AV H1L 3S 3AV H1L 3S Ll
O �
❑ =�IInIIII b� 4
u ', ry 0 0
3�V H19 3S AMH�lVa3033 3�V H19 3S
a a a
s
4 _
C7 B
® �
/.MH�lVa3O33 p
® p 3�V H1S 3N _
fi� o ® 0 44
A c
W
4 yA U a
u
3�V Hit 3N �V Hlb 3S
fi cn 0
�fi e
Li
U F
0 Li <
44
Q
44 cn
v N
Li 3A Oas
pg U
Li
i ~
Z fi Q Q ❑
0_ 0_
3AV ONZ 3N _i��; ��._ 3AV ONZ 3S
V4 Min,
cn
4
Q
W
U � 4
3AV 1SL 3S
3A 1S 3N _ ❑ 4
LLI
44'o U �
N O Z' ❑
w � �
4 Q LJ 44[]
Sic
3AV NOINIMS N ® NOINIMS S
o 'z0
0
3AV 1SL MS 0
3AV' MN
Q
U
�I z I�
H
Z
III WzZ�Q
m Y
ON
>o�a
U 3 ® w v° aVZU
o G
Fey
HlVM301S Q Z aOa
IVMS �—O z
b31NVld II�I11ilVM a IX at
J
® J
Q
and 1S L 3N No ® 3nb 1S L 3S
® U
AIVM301S
831NVld V 0
Y
AlVM301S J
Q
,± 3 Hwd
w OHO
JW N (nOUl
U
J�R
a ® NO
3 0 mm
o
N I ; N
Q
U
�I z I�
zza
Q J ��Y II Q �w ci�F
II w
V) z
>IlVM301S J <?
>ilVM3 Z
b31NVld i� � Q N
3nb' 1SL IN V) �y� ) 3nb' 1St 3S
�c "
�I ICI
a31NVld � �\ ` �� `' AIVM301S
V 0
Y
A-1VM301S J
a
w Oowm
® o HO
JW n0(n
�II
JOQ
UO w
�� o
i
MEMORANDUM
r
TO: Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM: Donald B. Cooper, City Manager
DATE: April 8, 2015
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM WS.3.-SPECIAL/WORKSHOP MEETING OF APRIL 14,2015
DISCUSSION REGARDING ARTISTS ALLEY PROPERTY
BACKGROUND
The item before the City Commission is a discussion regarding the Artists Alley Property.
i
MEMORANDUM
r
TO: Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM: Donald B. Cooper, City Manager
DATE: April 6, 2015
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM WS.4.-SPECIALIWORKSHOP MEETING OF APRIL 14,2015
LAKE IDA PROPERTY PURCHASE
BACKGROUND
This item before the City Commission is a discussion regarding the procurement of the Lake Ida
Property.
Rangel, Delores
From: Cooper, Donald
Sent: Thursday,April 02, 2015 1:21 PM
To: Rangel, Delores
Subject: FW: DRAFT Lake Ida Property County Commission Item
Attachments: Lake Ida.docx
Can u please print out the email and attachments
From: Robert Weisman [mailto:RWeisman@pbcgoy.arg]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 3:32 PM
To: Cooper, Donald
Cc: Eric Call; Ross Hering; ]on Van Arnam; Fitzpatrick, Mike; LAK KALRA; Gary Fishman
Subject: DRAFT"Lake Ida Property County Commission Item
Don, For your information and use, attached is the substantially complete draft Board item. The County has
had no interest in maintaining public ownership of the property for many years due to the cost of the bridge
connection with little public gain, security issues that arise with thru access, and lack of legal access from the
north. We also don't understand why if there is ever to be a crossing under 1-95, which we think is an
expensive challenge at best, why that cannot occur on the south side. A recommendation of staff that did
receive County Commission support at the last meeting is that if the property is sold to a municipality, that no
costs should ever be incurred by the County to achieve connectivity. I realize that is not binding on future
boards, but it is an expression of Board policy for future consideration.
Please advise if you have any questions.
Bob Weisman
PBC Administrator
Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing.
i
Agenda Item it:
PALM BEACH COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date. April 21,2015 [ ] Consent [X] Regular
[ ] Ordinance [ ] Public Hearing
Department: Facilities Development&Operations
I. EXECUTIVE BRIEF
s
Motion and Title: Staff recommends motion to approve: A Deposit Receipt and Contract For Sale
and Purchase with Lake Ida Tract,LLC for the sale of approximately 5 acres of vacant land adjacent to
Lake Ida Park for$500,000. As an alternative,the City of Delray Beach has recently expressed interest
in acquiring the property,which Staff does not recommend.
Summary: The County owns approximately 5 acres of surplus vacant land at the north end of Lake
Ida Park. This property is separated from the rest of the Park by a canal and has no legal access. The
most recent appraisal valued the property at$480,000. Lake Ida Tract, LLC,the principal of which is
Lak Kalra who also owns the adjoining property, was the sole bidder on a recent IFB with a bid of
$500,000. On October 21, 2014, the Board, rejected Lake Ida Tract's Bid and chose to sell the
property to the City of Boynton Beach for $100,000. Subsequently the Boynton Beach City Council
voted against purchasing the property. The City of Delray Beach has now indicated a desire to
purchase the property upon the terms initially proposed by Boynton Beach. The sale of this property
has become a contentious issue between two factions within the larger community—those wanting to
create a bikeway/greenway connecting residential communities and public facilities within Boynton,
Delray and Boca Raton; and the adjoining property owner and residents within the neighboring
Boynton residential development that oppose a neighborhood park, greenway and any connection to
Lake Ida Park. The opposition fears an increase in traffic and potential for loitering/vandalism/crime.
Mr. Kalra has stated that he will never allow access through his adjoining property for the park and
greenway. Staff again recommends the sale of the property to Lake Ida Tract, LLC as it will generate
substantially more revenue for the County than Delray Beach's proposal. This sale must be approved
by a Supermajority Vote(5 Commissioners).(PREM)Districts 3&4 (HJF)
Background and Policy Issues:
(continued on page 3)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Deposit Receipt and Contract for Sale and Purchase
3. Disclosure of Beneficial Interests
Recommended By:
Department Director Date
Approved By:
County Administrator Date
H. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
A. Five Year Summary of Fiscal Impact:
Fiscal Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Capital Expenditures
Operating Costs
External Revenues <$500,000>
Program Income(County)
In-Kind Match(County
NET FISCAL IMPACT <S500,000>
#ADDITIONAL FTE
POSITIONS (Cumulative)
Is Item Included in Current Budget: Yes No
Budget Account No: Fund 0001 Dept 410 Unit 4240 Object 6422
Program
B. Recommended Sources of Funds/Summary of Fiscal Impact:
A sale to Lake Ida Tract, LLC will generate $500,000 in unanticipated revenue. If the Board
decides to transfer the property to the City of Delray Beach, Staff estimates that County would
receive approximately$100,000 in revenue.
Fixed Assets Number a portion of G07147 and a portion of G03058
C. Departmental Fiscal Review:
III.REVIEW COMMENTS
A. OFMB Fiscal and/or Contract Development Comments:
OFMB Contract Development and Control
B. Legal Sufficiency:
Assistant County Attorney
C. Other Department Review:
Department Director
This summary is not to be used as a basis for payment.
G TREM\AGENM 2015\4-211Lake lda.dwx
Page 3
Background and Policy Issues continued:
The Lake Ida Park property was acquired by tax deeds on May 7, 1945 and October 22, 1946. The
Park property lies between 1-95 and Lake Ida. Somewhere around June 1950,the LWDD constructed a
canal which separated this 5 acre parcel from the rest of the Park. The only current means of obtaining
access to this property is to reach an agreement with the adjacent property owner or construct a bridge
across the canal to connect to the Park,which staff estimates would cost between$250,000 - $400,000.
As a practical matter;this lack of access makes the property of use to only the adjacent property owner
at this time. At some point in the future when the adjoining property owner submits an application for
development approvals for its adjoining property, the City of Boynton Beach could require that
dedicated legal access to this property be provided through the proposed development. However, the
adjoining property owner has stated that it will never allow access, which probably means that an
action by Boynton to require legal access will be subject to legal challenge. The timing of when that
would occur is uncertain. The southern approximately 100' of the County property lies within the
municipal boundaries of the City of Delray Beach. However, as there is no access to Lake Ida Park or
other property within Delray limits, Staff has always assumed that the County property would be
annexed into Boynton Beach when sold for development.
The property is currently assessed by the Property Appraiser's Office at $8,751. This value is
obviously not up to date. Staff has had the property appraised several times over the years, In 2005,an
appraisal was obtained which valued the property at$840,000 without legal access, and at $2,400,000
assuming access could be obtained. An appraisal obtained in January of 2008, valued the property at
$1,237,000 without legal access, and at $1,994,000 assuming legal access could be obtained. The
hypothetical assumption that access could be obtained clearly results in a higher valuation. The most
recent appraisal obtained in April of 2013 valued the property at$480,000.This latest appraisal utilized
an "over the fence" approach to valuation to arrive at the $480,000 value. This essentially values the
property based upon what it is worth to the adjoining owner. As demonstrated by the range in values
and how they have changed over time,the state of the general economy has had a significant impact on
the value of this property. While land values are increasing, values have not yet fully recovered to
2005-2006 highs. The lack of dedicated legal access to this property also has a significant impact upon
valuation of this property and makes it difficult for appraisers to value. It should also be noted that the
County previously had the property under contract to the previous owner of the adjoining property for
$1,600,000, and the contract was terminated in 2011 (82411-0900). Staff believes that ultimately
when the adjoining owner proceeds to develop/sell its property, this property will increase in value.
However,the sale of the property now will help offset budgetary funding constraints and will return the
property to the tax rolls.
The City of Boynton Beach contacted Staff in July of 2013 to explore the potential for this property to
be used by/conveyed to the City for a park as part of a greenway/bikeway system. At that time, Staff
informed the City that the County could expect to generate approximately $400,000 from the sale of
the property. In January of 2014, the City Commission authorized City Staff to negotiate a purchase
from the County for $100,000. Representatives of Boynton Beach met with the County's Park and
Recreation Department to discuss the City's greenway/bikeway concept which included both a bridged
connection from this property to Lake Ida Park and a floating bridge/walkway in the canal extending
under I-95. Due to concerns regarding the viability of the City's program,including the ability to make
connections to communities west of I-95 using a floating bridge under I-95, questions regarding
funding the cost of a bridge from this property to Lake Ida Park and the low offer price, Parks and
Recreation was not supportive of Boynton Beach's concept. On October 21, 2014(Agenda Item 6C-2)
the Board considered Staffs recommendation to accept the Bid submitted by Lake Ida Tract, LLC. as
well as Boynton's request to purchase the property for$100,000. The Board rejected Lake Ida Tract's
Bid and directed Staff to prepare the documentation for a sale to Boynton Beach.
County Staff prepared a proposed deed to Boynton containing a restriction limiting use to a
neighborhood Park as part of a greenway/pathway and requiring development within five (5) years.
Boynton requested 10 years to develop the property. The Boynton Beach City Council considered the
proposed purchase at the February 17 City Council meeting and voted against purchasing the property.
Page 4
Background and Policy Issues continued:
Subsequently, the City of Delray Beach requested that the County not take any further action with
respect to the property while Delray evaluates whether it desires to purchase the property. Delray is
proposing to hold a workshop meeting on this matter in mid-April. Staff informed the Delray City
Manager that we would present this item for reconsideration by the Board at the April 21 meeting.
Lake Ida Tract is an entity controlled by the same individuals who control Eden Lake, LLC, the
adjoining property owner.Under Florida Statutes Section 286.23, a Disclosure of Beneficial Interests is
required to be provided in connection with any purchase of property by the County. Such Disclosure is
not required in connection with the sale of land by the County. However, Staff is requesting such
Disclosures for all transactions with private entities. Lake Ida Tract, LLC provided the Disclosure
attached as Attachment 3, which identifies the ownership interest of Lake Ida Tract, LLC. as Girish
Kalra 49%, Gorav Kalra 49%, and Lakhmichand Kalra 2%.
Lake Ida Tract, LLC. will be required at closing to enter into a Restrictive Covenant Agreement and a
Management flan with the County that obligates Lake Ida Tract,LLC to create and maintain a 10'
wide shoreline enhancement and littoral zone at its sole cost and expense.
Taylor G. Levy RECEIVED
1810 Lake Drive, Delray Beach FL 33444
C: 516-945-5408—tayiorelevy @gmail.com APR 0 I J
!-'IT'S/ M1lidhldi^�
April 9, 2015
Re: Delray land Acquisition from Palm Beach County-Property known as;z 4.8acres of vegetated land PCN 00-43-46-05-00-000-5080
Delray Beach Commissioners
Attention: Mayor Glickstein,Vice-Mayor Petrolia, Deputy Vice Mayor Jacquet,Commissioner Jarjura, &Commissioner Katz.
Dear Mr. Cooper,
Per our meeting last week this letter shall further confirm that myself and some of my neighbors are prepared to donate the sum of
$100,000 to the City of Delray Beach for the exclusive purpose of purchasing the land known as PCN 00-43-46-05-00-000-5080
approximately 4.8 acres of vegetated land(next to the Grimes property at the Northwest corner of Lake Ida)from Palm Beach
County.The funds are ready and can be made available on two(2)day notice to fund the land acquisition.
As discussed our intention is to help Delray purchase this special property to preserve one of its crown jewels,namely Lake Ida, its
neighboring landscape,open space and parks, and its unique and irreplaceable mark on the City.We trust the City and its leadership
to find the most appropriate use for the property provided it is deed restricted so it will never be used as a development site or for
private use.We defer to the City and its staff to ascertain its best uses subject to the restrictions exhibited on Exhibit A attached
hereto("Restrictive Covenants").While we could envision this space being annexed to the park to the South,that vision has so many
possibilities. By example we know that giving it non car bridge ingress and egress to the South(e.g. a golf cart/walking/bike bridge
only)could make it a special addition for the limited uses of a bike path,workout trail and or nature trail, a seemingly light use that
could benefit all City residence in perpetuity while maintaining and or complementing the already present foliage that exists there
today.That foliage acts as an air filter,a sound barrier,and a nature preserve for so many birds and animals.
In addition, due to the size of the contribution we believe it is critical that the County not place any deadlines on Delray's purposing
the land for a particular use. In other words,the purchase should be without contingencies except at a maximum the notion of
preservation and future public use,e.g. by example and without limitation even if it sat in its current form for 11 years,and only in
the 12th year Delray added a bridge and walking trails that would be acceptable. If the county were to place an outside date
triggering some reversion,we as the donors would want either the right to recapture the land for some nominal dollar amount(e.g.
one dollar)or a return of our funds at such time.
As an alternative to the above proposal, again purely to illustrate further options,we the donors would also purchase the land from
Delray Beach(with our funds) and agree to the Restrictive Covenants that we expect Delray Beach to adhere to and agree to in
exchange for the donation,and most importantly to secure this precious lands pristine existence as a part of Lake Ida and greater
Delray for an enduring and certain future.This could be done through a designated entity and or to be formed not for profit,again
for the benefit of the City, its visitors,and residence.
Thank you again for taking the time to meet with us and to consider the above. If anything requires further clarification please let
me know so we can revise the letter accordingly or provide further explanation.
Sincerely,
X � —
Ae, �k
Taylor G. Levy
Cc:J.Veccia; D. Lebensohn
333
i
EXHIBIT A- OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS REQUIRED FOR THE
LAKE IDA PARCEL—IF DELRAY BEACH TAKES TITLE.
i
. Conservation easement with no removal of any vegetation beginning from the waters
E
natural (current) edge going 50ft landward in all directions.
2. A protective strip from the western property line to be continuous with the Conservation
easement allowing no removal of any vegetation beginning from the western property
line(running parallel to 95) running the north and south edge going 50 ft towards the
water in all directions.
3. Bike path or pedestrian walking path not to be greater than 12 ft in width. Must take
minimal invasive approach when laying out path to only disturb vegetation that is less
than l Oft in height and wind the path when necessary to avoid vegetation that is less then
1Oft in height.
4. No boat launching facility to be allowed on property.
5. No over water structures to be built excluding the pedestrian and or cyclist bridge from
the Lake Ida dog park(Lake Ida West Park) to the south just to gain access to the
property.This is to be as minimal as necessary;just to gain access to the property.
6. Installation and maintenance of a perimeter fence on the Northern portion of the lot.
i
i
I
I