Loading...
HPB 02-15-06 0�j o c►` AGENDA r to HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING P4r 1$P CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: February 15, 2006 Time: 6:00 P.M. Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers, City Hall The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199 (TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ACTION ITEMS A. Block 69 Parking Garage, Old School Square Historic Arts District, Weiner & Associates, Authorized Agent. Consideration of a Class V Site Plan two-year extension request. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 137 NW 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, Jude Endres, Owner Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for an exterior siding material change. B. 515 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Sandra Hoesley, Owner; Roger Cope, Authorized Agent. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a partial demolition and subsequent addition to the main dwelling and revisions to the approved garage/guest cottage. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS • Historic Preservation Month 2006 •Annual Poster Contest • Historic District Markers V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Reports from Historic District Representatives • Board Members • Staff VI. ADJOURN .Amy E. _ACvarez Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Posted on: February 9, 2006 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2006 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez Azua, John Miller, Jr., Linda Lake Maura Dersh, Randee Schatz, and Michelle Reich MEMBERS ABSENT: JoAnn Peart STAFF PRESENT: Paul Dorling, Amy Alvarez, Brian Shutt, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:04 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. ACTION ITEMS A. Block 69 Parking Garage, Old School Square Historic Arts District, Weiner & Aronson, Authorized Agent The item before the Board is for the Consideration of a Class V Site Plan Two-Year Extension Request. Chairman Perez stepped down. Vice Chairman Miller asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Dorling entered the project into the record. The subject property is located on the west side of SE 1st Avenue, approximately 225' north of SE 1st Street. The .41 acre site consists of Lots 20, 21 and 22, a Subdivision of Block 69, and is located within the Old School Square Historic Arts District, which is subject to the regulations as outlined in the CBD (Central Business District) zone district. The Worthing Place development proposal has been approved for 236 residential units and commercial development. The proposal included construction of the subject parking garage to replace parking spaces for the GRIP Building and public surface parking spaces. All of the units that were to be located on the subject property were transferred to Historic Preservation Board Minutes February 15, 2006 Block 77 on the east side of SE 1st Avenue. The public parking and the GRIP parking spaces that are to be eliminated with the Worthing Place development are to be replaced by a 202-space parking garage on Block 69 (subject property). The garage (Block 69) will be constructed by the Block 77 Group and deeded over to the City. Construction of the Block 77 development is to occur after a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the parking garage on Block 69 and the garage is deeded to the City. The 202- space parking garage will provide 95 parking spaces for the GRIP building, which represents 45 spaces more than are currently in the GRIP parking lot. The garage will also contain 107 public parking spaces that will be available 24 hours a day. In addition, 40 of the GRIP spaces will be available for public use from 6:01 p.m. through 7:59 a.m. Monday through Friday and 12:01 p.m. Saturdays through 7:59 a.m. on Mondays. In October 1999, conditional use applications were submitted to allow the residential units to exceed 30 units per acre (219 units) and to allow a building height up to 60'. In conjunction with the conditional use applications, a text amendment to the OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zoning district regulations was processed to include Lots 19-24, Block 69, Town of Linton, as properties that could be developed per the CBD zoning district regulations regarding permitted uses and development standards. The purpose of the LDR amendment was to accommodate the GRIP/public parking structure. The development received Conditional Use approval on January 4, 2000, Site Plan approval for the residential and retail building on May 24, 2000 and site plan approval for the for the public parking garage on January 17, 2001. The CRA agreements include a clause that construction of the Block 77 development (residential and retail space) could not occur until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the public parking garage on Block 69. After these approvals were granted, the development proposals were subject to multiple lawsuits from an adjacent property owner. These lawsuits and subsequent appeals were decided on March 31, 2004 in favor of the City. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.4 (F)(4), when a lawsuit is filed, an extension of development approval shall be granted without further review and shall be effective until the litigation is concluded. Utilizing the March 31 2004 dates, the current development approvals are valid through March 31, 2006. At the January 17, 2006 City Commission meeting, the conditional use extension request for the Worthing Place/Block 77 development was approved by a vote of 4-0 and is valid until January 17, 2008. At it's meeting of February 8, 2006 the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board approved the site plan extension request for Worthing Place/Block 77, which is now valid until February 8, 2008. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.4(F)(1) (Extensions), extensions may be granted to the previously approved application, pursuant to the following: ■ A written request for an extension must have been received by the City at least forty- five (45) days prior to the expiration date; • The letter must set forth the basis and reason for the extension; ■ The extension shall be considered by the same body which granted the original approval; • The extension, if granted, shall be for eighteen (18) months unless otherwise stated. The applicant submitted the following statement, regarding the delay with the construction of the proposed project, and in support of the extension request. The request was submitted within the required forty-five (45) day time frame prior to the expiration date. 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes February 15, 2006 The project was embroiled in protracted litigation through March 31, 2004. Florida case law, with which I am sure you're familiar, had just previously held that a developer proceeding on an approval which was the subject of litigation did so at risk of forfeiture. Block 77 abated proceeding during the pendency of the litigation pursuant to applicable ordinance of the City specifically granting relief to developers holding entitlements subject to pending litigation. The foregoing was a source of delay for which Block 77 should not be prejudiced. Additionally, the impact of the past two hurricane seasons, culminating in Hurricane Wilma and its devastation to the local infrastructure, has delayed the execution of the Project. Among other things, the scarcity of building resources and professionals in the field has delayed the completion of plans and drawings. Moreover, the Project is of such complexity and importance to the City of Delray Beach that the general time contemplated by the LDRs has proven insufficient in the case of the Worthing Place project and would not allow completion without the benefit of extensions to previously received entitlements. Nonetheless, the applicant has continued to remain diligent in efforts and has continued to show good faith to actually commence and eventually complete construction. A myriad of circumstances beyond the control of Block 77 have precluded the completion of construction. By way of example, but certainly not limitation, certain title problems were identified following contract execution which are now resolved. More recently, Block 77 evidenced its good faith and continued financial commitment to the Project by obtaining a contract for the purchase of certain additional property, long sought after, which will expedite the construction of the Project. Block 77 has spent considerable time, effort and funding making accommodations to neighboring property owners who had to be appeased because of conditions of development imposed by the City. However, notwithstanding the foregoing and the series of other unforeseen independent setbacks, not of Block 77's making or control, the site permit, as well as the parking garage structure permit, have been issued by the City of Delray Beach and we are ready to post a bond for the garage. The permit numbers are #05-99622 and#05-99586, respectively. As previously stated, the applicant has complied with the site plan conditions of approval except for completing the platting process for Block 77. The construction phase of the project has commenced with receipt of the demolition permits and excavation of the Block 69 site. The delay in entering the construction phase of the project was due to resolving issues relating to the lawsuits and shortages in building materials. Based on these delays, it is reasonable to grant the extension of the site plan approval since these issues were beyond the control of the developer. Michael Weiner, Esquire, Weiner & Aronson, Delray Beach, representing the applicant, advised he is in agreement with the staff report. We had three sets of extensions that went before the City Commission, the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board, and the Historic Preservation Board. The extensions were granted. This request is before you due to a technicality because it is in the OSSHAD. Vice Chairman Miller asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Vice Chairman Miller closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and approved 5 to 0 (Chairman Perez stepped down) to move approval of the request for an extension of the Class V site 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes February 15, 2006 plan, landscape plan, and design elements approvals for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request, and approval thereof, meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.4(D) and (F)(1) and (2) of the Land Development Regulations subject to the previous conditions of approval, with said approval to be valid until February 15, 2008. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 137 NW 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, Jude Endres, Owner Chairman Perez returned to the Board. Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness request for the replacement of cedar shingle siding with Hardishingle siding on a contributing dwelling located at 137 NW 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Ms. Alvarez entered the project file into the record. A Class V Site Plan Application was approved with conditions by the Board in 2003. The application consisted of converting the 824 sq. ft. one-story, contributing, single family home to an office, demolishing an 867 sq. ft. one-story, contributing cottage/garage, constructing a 1,526 sq. ft. addition on the contributing building, and other required site improvements. One condition of approval, which pertains to this specific application, was that original architectural components be retained as follows: exposed rafter tails, consistent, rectangular gable vents, brick fireplace, wood shingle siding be retained, and that any new walls constructed have a smooth stucco exterior. The application before the Board is that of a material change regarding the exterior siding on the original structure. As previously noted, the structure contained wood shingle siding which was specified as a condition of approval that the same material be used and retained. However, the applicant requests that the Board consider the use of a "fake" wood shingle siding, called Hardishingle. The proposed project consists of the replacement of the dwelling's existing wood shingle exterior siding with a "faux" material made to have the "appearance" of a wood shingle. This material is not consistent with the LDRs, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines nor the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, all of which have been noted above. Additionally, the retainment of the original material, not merely the look of said material, was specified as a condition of approval by the Board in 2003. The permitted use of this material on contributing structures would clearly be inconsistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation as well as the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. Therefore, positive findings cannot be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Mr. Jude Endres, owner of the property, stated he wants to use Hardishingle siding because of its durability, resistance to termites, etc. All the shingles have been taken off 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes February 15, 2006 the house, as we were unable to salvage the siding. This product looks identical to cedar shingles. Mr. Endres presented a sample of the Hardishingle to each Board member. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Board discussion ensued relative to the Design Guidelines, page 34, and the Board decided that Hardishingles should not replace the original cedar shingles. Hardishingles could be used in new construction, however, not on a historic home. Historic homes which are contributing should maintain their original look. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. There were no questions of the applicant by the Board. It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and approved 6 to 0 to move denial of the COA for 137 NW 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) of the Land Developments Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. B. 515 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a partial demolition and subsequent alternations and additions to the main dwelling and revisions to the approved garage, at 515 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Ms. Alvarez entered the project into the record. The subject property consists of Lots 11 & 12, Block 4, Del-Ida Park, and is located on the southeast corner of Lake Court and North Swinton Avenue. The zoning for the property is R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). The property contains a two-story, single family residence and accessory shed. The Mediterranean Revival residence, built in 1925, is of wood frame construction clad in stucco and is a contributing structure in the Del-Ida Park Historic District inventory. The structure was originally located at 324 NE 2nd Avenue and moved to its present location in July 1961 to make way for a Post Office. At its January 4, 2006 meeting, the HPB reviewed an application pertaining to alterations and additions to the existing historic residence, demolition of an existing shed, and construction of a detached garage/guest cottage, installation of a swimming pool, fence, and associated landscape plan. The Board approved the application with conditions. However, the applicant has since revised the plans which require further Board review. The existing rear addition, according Building Department records, was constructed in December 1961, a few months after the main structure was relocated to its present location. The existing measurements of the rear addition are approximately nine feet (9') on the south by nine feet six inches (9'6") on the east with a sloped roof ranging from ten feet six inches (10'6") to twelve feet six inches (12'6") in height. The previous submittal approved by the Board on January 4, 2006 slightly enlarged the rear addition to ten feet 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes February 15, 2006 (10') by seventeen feet (17'), with an overall height increase of three inches (3"). The applicant now proposes to completely demolish the existing addition and introduce a significantly larger flat roofed addition to the rear. This new addition is proposed at a length of twenty-two feet (22') on the south and seventeen feet (17') on the east. The height measures approximately fourteen feet (14'), with a portion of the wall measuring up to only ten and a half feet (10'6") and topped off with a three and a half foot (3'6") rail. Half-circle shaped cast stone steps lead up the door located on the rear addition. The original submittal of the garage/guest house included a door on the east (rear) elevation. Part of the condition of approval was to include a barrel tile overhang above the door. The submitted revisions have omitted this door leaving the elevation to consist of two separate sets of French doors and their associated wrought iron balconies located on the second story. The existing residence at 515 North Swinton Avenue is a contributing structure in the Del- Ida Park Historic District. The demolition of the rear shed addition is not problematic, as it was constructed in late 1961. The proposed addition is in keeping with the existing elements of the structure. However, the existing size, scale and roof type are preferred, and a similar design would be favored over the submitted proposal. The existing addition gives a sense of change over time, while the proposed is merely compatible in its intent. Therefore, the length of the addition should be reduced by at least four to eight feet (4'-8') in order to offer a more proportionate and visually compatible elevation, which would also be more appropriate in relation to the existing historic structure. An additional suggestion would be to consider a low pitched barrel tile roof instead of the flat roof. In reference to the proportion of openings on the addition, revisions should be made. The original submittal approved with conditions by the Board on January 4, 2006 contained four (4) sets of French doors on the south elevation. One of the conditions was that no more than three (3) sets be located on said elevation, whereas Staff previously recommended that only one (1) set of French doors be permitted. Although three (3) sets have been previously approved and the applicant has proposed three (3) sets, the applicant has redesigned the entire rear addition which involves the French doors and therefore gives cause for further review by Staff. As a result, Staff has concluded that the proposed amount (3 sets) of French doors remains excessive and should be reduced for the following reasons: three (3) sets are excessive and inappropriate on the same story and wall plane; the proposed amount provides an uninteresting monotonous rhythm, and; the south elevation is highly visible from North Swinton Avenue, regardless of any amount of landscaping that might be proposed. The amount of French doors should be reduced to two (2) sets, located in the existing window openings, as proposed. The third set, which is located within the new addition, should be changed to a set of single hung windows similar to those located on the front elevation in order to avoid a monotonous appearance and give a more unified design. The square windows on the south and north elevations should be removed and either one (1) or two (2) 4 /1, single hung windows should be centered in the rear section, located below the railing. The proposed addition requires differentiation between the old and the new. While the addition, as proposed, borrows elements from the existing structure, as do the suggestions made by Staff, which all bring a sort of unification to the design, a more permanent and concrete solution should be sought out in order to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation which states that, "The new work shall be 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes February 15, 2006 differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment." Therefore, a solution would be to apply a stucco texture different than that of the existing historic structure. Regarding the revisions to the garage/guest cottage, the changes take place on the rear elevation and would not be visible from the street. However, it should be noted that this revision makes the elevation very top-heavy and unbalanced. Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(6), and (E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made, subject to all noted conditions. Mr. Roger Cope, Cope Architects, the client wishes to expand the addition to the back of the house, and the expansion of that is the crux of the issue tonight. Conditions: No. 2. I would request that the Board does not require us to reduce the length. No. 3. We came to the Board with 4 sets of French doors, and the Board suggested we should only have 3 sets. We went back to the drawing board and the revised plan has 3 sets, now. No. 4. A true French door is undivided. The pool is located outside of the set of French doors with a porch between the house and the pool. The divided lights would obscure the view from the house. There are divided upper panes in the windows, with the lower portion undivided. We choose not to have divided French doors. No. 6. Cabana Bath — there is a small square window that we pulled off to the right and retained. We would like to keep the square window where it is. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. Ms. Lois Brezinski, 110 NE 7th Street, Delray Beach, questioned what the square footage of the existing home is, what will the square footage is once the addition is added, and how large is the lot. Ms. Brezinski agreed with Ms. Alvarez that three sets of French doors were excessive. Ms. Livia Landry, 701 North Swinton Avenue, advised the Board that she has 3 sets of French doors on her Florida room and they look quite nice. Ms. Landry inquired if they were doing demolition work on the existing structure and is the building contributing, as I am against demolition on a home in the Historic District. I think it would be appropriate to put off demolition until a design plan is agreed upon. I do not want to see a building over the garage, as it would be too cumbersome. I am not against the addition; however, I would like you to take into consideration the demolition aspect. Ms. Cathy Appleton, 1127 Nassau Street, urged the Board to accept the staff's view, i.e., reducing the size of the home. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes February 15, 2006 Ms. Alvarez advised: • The French doors are highly visible on Swinton Avenue, and this makes it inappropriate for the area. • The previous plans that were approved had a much smaller addition, and that is why it is back for review. • The size of the square window is not appropriate in the smaller addition. It is now out of proportion with the size of the home. • The length of the addition is 22 feet, and that is 56% of the length of the existing historic structure. Mr. Cope advised that the site is over 4,000 square feet, and the house sits way back on the site. I do not agree that the French doors are visible from Swinton Avenue, and they are probably 60 feet from the sidewalk. There were no questions of the applicant by the Board. Board discussion ensued relative to the following: • Mr. Perez advised the existing footprint is only 15% of the entire site, and this is a minor addition. • The demolition of the shed was approved previously, and this is not open for discussion tonight. • The applicant is doing a wonderful job, and this is what you want to see in the Historic District. • The garage was previously approved. Mr. Cope presented a rendering of the floor plan on the overhead, and advised: • The counter was about 7 feet from the French doors. The kitchen is linear, and has an open counter that relates to the French doors. • The square window would be in the showed in the cabana bath. Mr. Perez stated the French doors should have two (2) horizontal divisions as it would match the window above. Ms. Reich said she likes the three French doors; however, the panes should be divided. Ms. Dersh advised she does not have a problem with the French doors, but would like to see divisions on them. She understands Ms. Alvarez's comment regarding the proportion of the addition, and the size of the small window. Chairman Perez advised he would like to see the addition of a hip roof, and suggested that the window be shifted from one side of the house to the other. Mr. Cope advised by putting a hip roof you wouldn't know if it was original or not, and preferred to keep the flat roof. Ms. Schatz questioned if the guidelines were being followed. 8 Historic Preservation Board Minutes February 15, 2006 Mr. Cope advised his client would be more than willing to accept the window centered in the room and not have a fixed window in the shower. It is a privacy issue with the window in the powder room. A window can be designed; however, it will not be as tall, as it needs to be up higher. It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and approved 6 to 0 to move approval of COA 2006-130 for 515 North Swinton, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(6), and (E)(8) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions. 1. That the stucco texture on the new addition differ from that of the existing; 2. That all French doors located on the main dwelling contain divided lights, rather than a single pain of glass, as proposed; 3. That a pair of 4/1 windows, similar to the existing 4/1 on the south elevation, is located to the left of the end of the wall plane, removing the square window on that elevation and replacing it to the rear; 4. That the site and landscape plans are consistent, and; 5. That the proposed Adonidia Palm is changed to another species. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS • Historic Preservation Month May is Historic Preservation Month, and the Florida State Conference is being held in St. Augustine. • Annual Poster Contest Ms. Alvarez advised she would like to target area schools regarding a theme and do a presentation for staff and students. Ms. Alvarez will speak with Janet Meeks, Education Coordinator with the City. • Historic District Markers Ms. Alvarez was reviewing the State markers on the State web site. Ms. Dottie Patterson, Delray Beach Historic Society Archivist, and Karen Preston, Delray Beach Historic Society Director are working on signage for historic sites through the City. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: Ms. Cathy Appleton mentioned that the Posters should be displayed in the hallways of City Hall, as well as at Old School Square. Ms. Alvarez advised that that would be quite an expense. B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None 9 • Historic Preservation Board Minutes February 15, 2006 C. Board Members: None D. Staff: V. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 7:40 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 15, 2006 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on March 15, 2006. ienisti)7 - /Z2/1-1— e A. Valek Executive Assistant/Board Liaison If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 10 DELRAY BEACH DEFRAY BEACH i•Amara; maf Td HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD NI-A icaCiq (I�� MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT 'IP ivea 1593 20U1 z0DW Agent: Michael Weiner Property Owner: Block 77 Development Group LLC Project Location: Block 69, West side of SE 1st Avenue, Between East Atlantic Avenue and SE 1st Street, Old School Square Historic Arts District HPB Meeting Date: February 15, 2006 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a two-year time extension to the Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements for the Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, Old School Square Historic Arts District pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND The subject property is located on the west side of SE 1st Avenue, approximately 225' north of SE 1st Street. The .41 acre site consists of Lots 20, 21 and 22, a Subdivision of Block 69, and is located within the Old School Square Historic Arts District, which is subject to the regulations as outlined in the CBD (Central Business District) zone district. The Worthing Place development proposal has been approved for 236 residential units and commercial development. The proposal included construction of the subject parking garage to replace parking spaces for the GRIP Building and public surface parking spaces. All of the units that were to be located on the subject property were transferred to Block 77 on the east side of SE 1st Avenue. The public parking and the GRIP parking spaces that are to be eliminated with the Worthing Place development are to be replaced by a 202-space parking garage on Block 69 (subject property). The garage (Block 69) will be constructed by the Block 77 Group and deeded over to the City. Construction of the Block 77 development is to occur after a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the parking garage on Block 69 and the garage is deeded to the City. The 202-space parking garage will provide 95 parking spaces for the GRIP building, which represents 45 spaces more than are currentlyin the GRIP parking lot. The garage will also contain 107 public parking spaces that will be available 24 hours a day. In addition, 40 of the GRIP spaces will be available for public use from 6:01 p.m. through 7:59 a.m. Monday through Friday and 12:01 p.m. Saturdays through 7:59 a.m. on Mondays. In October 1999, conditional use applications were submitted to allow the residential units to exceed 30 units per acre (219 units) and to allow a building height up to 60'. In conjunction with the conditional use applications, a text amendment to the OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zoning district regulations was processed to include Lots 19-24, Block 69, Town of Linton, as properties that could be developed per the CBD zoning district regulations regarding permitted uses and development standards. The purpose of the LDR amendment was to accommodate the GRIP/public parking structure. The development received Conditional Use approval on January 4, 2000, Site Plan approval for the residential and retail building on May 24, 2000 and site plan approval for the for the public parking garage on January 17, 2001. The CRA agreements include a clause that construction of the Block 77 development (residential and retail space) could not occur until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the public parking garage on Block 69. After these approvals were granted, the development proposals were subject to multiple lawsuits from an adjacent property owner. These lawsuits and subsequent appeals were decided on March 31, 2004 in favor of the City. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.4 (F)(4), when a lawsuit is filed, an extension of development approval shall be granted without further review and shall be effective until the litigation is concluded. Utillizing the March 31 2004 dates, the current development approvals are valid through March 31, 2006. Demolition permits for the existing structures on Block 69 have been issued and they have been demolished. The garage site has been fenced and excavated preparing the site for the installation of the footers and underground utilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.4(D), a development project shall be considered established when the improvements, representing 25% of the total cost of all improvements to be used in developing the project, have been constructed or a certificate of occupancy has been issued for use of the property pursuant to the development approval. The demolition and the current level of construction do not represent 25% of the total cost of all improvements and it does not appear the development will achieve this threshold by the expiration date. Therefore, the approval will expire on March 31, 2006, unless approval of the conditional use and site plan extensions are granted. A written request to extend these conditional use and site plan approvals for the mixed-use development and stand alone parking garage were filed within the forty-five (45) days as required by LDR Section 2.4.4(F). Additional background information and full analysis of the proposal can be found in the attached staff report, dated January 17, 2001. At the January 17, 2006 City Commission meeting, the conditional use extension request for the Worthing Place/Block 77 development was approved by a vote of 4-0 and is valid until January 17, 2008. At it's meeting of February 8, 2006 the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board approved the site plan extension request for Worthing Place/Block 77 which is now valid until February 8, 2008. This request is to extend the approval of the Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage. EXTENSION REQUEST 8, ANALYSIS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.4(F)(1) (Extensions), extensions may be granted to the previously approved application, pursuant to the following: • A written request for an extension must have been received by the City at least forty-five (45) days prior to the expiration date; • The letter must set forth the basis and reason for the extension; • The extension shall be considered by the same body which granted the original approval; • The extension, if granted, shall be for eighteen (18) months unless otherwise stated. LDR Section 2.4.4(F)(2) "Construction Has Commenced" Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.4(F)(2), when there are substantial improvements on the site, but the 25% establishment standard is not met, the granting agency shall consider the diligence and good faith of the developer to actually commence and complete construction. In this case, an extension to the originally approved project without change or without evaluation, pursuant to subsection (3), shall be granted to enable the developer to complete the project as opposed to allowing a continuing approval in order to more readily sell the land and/or project. Pursuant to LDR Appendix "A," the definition of construction is: "The building of or substantial improvement to any structure or the clearing, filling, or excavation of any land. When appropriate to the context, "CONSTRUCTION"refers to the act of construction or the result of construction." Given that the structure on Lot 22 has been demolished and the excavation of lots 20-22 (garage site), the provisions of Section 2.4.4(F)(2) shall apply to the proposed extension. In considering "diligence and good faith", the granting body shall consider: • When the construction commenced (construction which is commenced immediately preceding expiration generally indicates a lack of good faith); • The extent to which construction has proceeded; • The extent to which there has been a bonafide continuous effort to develop but because of circumstances beyond the control of the developer, it was not possible to meet the 25% standard. The applicant submitted the following statement, regarding the delay with the construction of the proposed project, and in support of the extension request. The request was submitted within the required forty-five (45) day time frame prior to the expiration date. The project was embroiled in protracted litigation through March 31, 2004. Florida case law, with which I am sure you're familiar, had just previously held that a developer proceeding on an approval which was the subject of litigation did so at risk of forfeiture. Block 77 abated proceeding during the pendency of the litigation pursuant to applicable ordinance of the City specifically granting relief to developers holding entitlements subject to pending litigation. The foregoing was a source of delay for which Block 77 should not be prejudiced. Additionally, the impact of the past two hurricane seasons, culminating in Hurricane Wilma and its devastation to the local infrastructure, has delayed the execution of the Project. Among other things, the scarcity of building resources and professionals in the field has delayed the completion of plans and drawings. Moreover, the Project is of such complexity and importance to the City of Delray Beach that the general time contemplated by the LDRs has proven insufficient in the case of the Worthing Place project and would not allow completion without the benefit of extensions to previously received entitlements. Nonetheless, the applicant has continued to remain diligent in efforts and has continued to show good faith to actually commence and eventually complete construction. A myriad of circumstances beyond the control of Block 77 have precluded the completion of construction. By way of example, but certainly not limitation, certain title problems were identified following contract execution which are now resolved. More recently, Block 77 evidenced its good faith and continued financial commitment to the Project by obtaining a contract for the purchase of certain additional property, long sought after, which will expedite the construction of the Project. Block 77 has spent considerable time, effort and funding making accommodations to neighboring property owners who had to be appeased because of conditions of development imposed by the City. However, notwithstanding the foregoing and the series of other unforeseen independent setbacks, not of Block 77's making or control, the site permit, as well as the parking garage structure permit, have been issued by the City of Delray Beach and we are ready to post a bond for the garage. The permit numbers are #05- 99622 and#05-99586, respectively. As previously stated, the applicant has complied with the site plan conditions of approval except for completing the platting process for Block 77. The construction phase of the project has sa commenced with receipt of the demolition permits and excavation of the Block 69 site. The delay in entering the construction phase of the project was due to resolving issues relating to the lawsuits and shortages in building materials. Based on these delays, it is reasonable to grant the extension of the site plan approval since these issues were beyond the control of the developer. If the request for the extension was to be denied, it would necessitate the filing of a new site plan application. The denial would be problematic, since the Land Development Regulations have been modified since the original approval of Worthing Place to include the Downtown Design Guidelines. Since the approved site plan does not comply with these guidelines, the development proposal would need to be completely redesigned. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.4(F)(1)(d), eighteen month extensions are allowed by code unless otherwise stated. The applicant has requested an extension of 24 months. Based upon the above, the extension request would be valid through February 15, 2008. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Postpone with direction. B. Move approval of the request for an extension of the Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements approvals for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request, and approval thereof, meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.4(D) and (F)(1) & (2) of the Land Development Regulations, subject to the previous conditions of approval. C. Move denial of the request for an extension of the Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements approvals for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request, and approval thereof, does not meet criteria set forth in Section 2.4.4(D) and (F)(1) & (2) of the Land Development Regulations. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the request for an extension of the Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements approvals for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request, and approval thereof, meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.4(D) and (F)(1) & (2) of the Land Development Regulations, subject to the previous conditions of approval, with said approval to be valid until February 15, 2008. Prepared By: Amy E Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: • Extension Request Letter from Michael Weiner, Esquire dated November 16, 2005 • Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Dated January 17, 2001. a `` 4 f A` .f CITY OF DELRAy BEACH .,,. „,. ..,:.,:„,:;,,,...,:_i, _.,;.::_r.,:r_. . cf, ,,,,,,:i„, ,,_ „„:„..„, ..„...av 4M.f04="4,j&-,,, -'-<,- ,.. vf, ,,f,i. ._„ -:;,/ DELRAY BEACH ' ._...; ua,,,;,v. ' n> :w�'fL.:2 `. 7-7-- .... _. ,--- 100 N W. 1st AVENUE • DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 • 561/243-7000 Inaba All-America City - 1 ' December 22, 2005 1993 2001 'Michael S. Weiner, Esq. 102 North Swinton Avenue Defray Beach, FL 33444 Re: Extension Requests for Worthing Place (Block 77)and Block 69 Parking Garage Dear Michael: This letter is provided regarding the extension requests for Worthing Place (Block 77) and Block 69 Parking Garage. Outline below is the tentative meeting schedules before the City Commission and Approval Boards regarding the Worthing Place (Block 77) Development: Action Approval Board Meeting Date Conditional Use City Commission January 17, 2006 Request at 6:00 p.m. Site Plan Site Plan Review and February 8, 2006 Appearance Board at 6:00 p.m. Regarding Block 69 Parking Garage, the extension request will be tentatively scheduled for the Historic Preservation Board meeting of February 15, 2006. In addition, a processing fee of $580.00 is required for each project ($1,160.00 total). Please submit this fee as soon as possible. If I can be of further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me at(561) 243-7044. Sincerely, )A\ flasmin Allen` Planner cc: Paul Dorling, AICP, Director of Planning and Zoning Mark McDonnell, AICP, Assistant Director of Planning and Zoning James Cain, Senior Planner kfrmy Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS WEINER &ARONSON, P.A. RECEIVED ATTORNEYS AT LAW The Clark House NOV 1 6 2005 102 North Swinton Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Telephone: (561)265-2666 PLANNING & ZONING Telecopier: (561)272-6831 E-mail: mweiner@zonelaw.com MICHAEL S.WEINER OF COUNSEL: CAROLE J.ARONSON ROBERT MARC SCHWARTZ,P.A. JASON S. MANKOFF Florida Bar Board Certified KERRY D.SAFIER Real Estate Lawyer PAMI R. MAUGHAM November 16, 2005 Via Hand Delivery Mr. Paul Dorling Director of Planning and Zoning City of Delray Beach 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Re: Request for Extension Our File No.: MORW008 Dear Paul: Thank you for your letter of May 27, 2005, in which you indicate that the Conditional Use and Site Plan for Worthing Place and the Site Plan for the Block 69 parking garage are subject to extension review as of March 31, 2006 (the "Review Date"). Pursuant to Section 2.4.4(F) of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida ("LDR's"), this letter is submitted on behalf of Block 77 - Development Group, LLC ("Block 77") as written request to the City of Delray Beach and its appropriate agencies having jurisdiction, for two (2)year extensions of each of the three(3)previously received entitlements,namely the Conditional Use and Site Plan for Block 77 and the Site Plan for the Block 69 parking garage (sometimes referred to as "Block 69").This request is being delivered as mandated more than forty five(45)days prior to the Review Date. As a courtesy, and not in limitation of further reasons or evidence to be presented at the appropriate hearings, we would like to enumerate some of the reasons why an extension for all three (3) entitlements should be granted. Block 77 and Block 69 are sometimes referred to collectively as the "Project." The Project was embroiled in protracted litigation through March 31, 2004. Florida case law, with which I am sure you are familiar, had just previously held that a developer proceeding on an approval which was the subject of litigation did so at risk of forfeiture.Block 77 abated proceeding during the pendency of the litigation pursuant to applicable ordinance of the City specifically granting relief to developers holding entitlements subject to pending litigation.The foregoing was a source of delay for which Block 77 should not be prejudiced. Additionally, the impact of the past two hurricane O:\MORW008\FLADOCS-#241953v3(Version 4).DOC • Mr.Paul Dorling November 16, 2005 Page 2 of 3 seasons,culminating in Hurricane Wilma and its devastation to the local infrastructure, have delayed the execution of this Project.Among other things,the scarcity of building resources and professionals in the field has delayed the completion of plans and drawings. Moreover, the Project is of such complexity and importance to the City of Delray Beach that the general time contemplated by the LDR's has proven insufficient in the case of the Worthing Place project and would not allow completion without the benefit of extensions to previously received entitlements. Nonetheless, the applicant has continued to remain diligent in its efforts and has continued to show good faith to actually commence and eventually complete construction. A myriad of circumstances beyond the control of Block 77 have precluded the completion of construction.By way of example,but certainly not limitation, certain title problems were identified following contract execution which are now resolved.More recently, Block 77 evidenced its good faith and continued financial commitment to the Project by obtaining a contract for the purchase of certain additional property, long sought after, which will expedite the construction of the Project. Block 77 has spent considerable time,effort and funding making accommodations to neighboring property owners who had to be appeased because of conditions of development imposed by the City. However, notwithstanding the foregoing and the series of other unforeseen independent setbacks,not of Block 77's making or control,the site permit,as well as the parking garage structure permit,have been issued by the City of Delray Beach and we are ready to post a bond for the garage.The permit numbers are#05-99622 and#05- 99586, respectively. One of the conditions to close title to the CRA property and City Lands which make up the Project is the delivery by Block 77 of a statutory surety bond, which is likewise a requirement for the residential building to be built on Block 77 guaranteeing completion.This condition precedent has rendered completion unfeasible heretofore since bonds could not be issued by sureties until all of the architectural plans are finalized.This was not possible until the parking garage for Block 69 was designed and • approved. An agreement was recently reached with the CRA and the City that modifies this condition which will now allow Block 77 to close on the CRA property and the City Lands. In addition, we are pleased to report that an architectural firm has now been engaged to prepare the final plans for the residential building to be constructed on Block 77. We anticipate those plans will be completed by the year end. A condition of approval to obtaining a building permit for the construction of Worthing Place on Block 77 has been the prior requirement of obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy for the parking garage to be constructed by Block 77 on Block 69. The Block 69 parking garage will be deeded by Block 77 to the City, at no charge to the City, to be utilized as a City parking garage before any permits may be issued for construction of the Worthing Place residences on Block 77. Surely the City will appreciate that financing for the completion of the parking garage on Block 69 could not be obtained unless there is an ability to provide lenders with a high level of comfort that the residential building on Block 77 can and will be built.Obviously,a lender would not commit to make a loan on a parking garage on Block 69 which must be turned over to the City at or about the time that the approvals for the rest of the project have O:\dORWOOMFLADOCS-#241953v3(Version 4).DOC Mr.Paul Dorling , November 16, 2005 Page 3 of 3 expired. So as to allow a lender to avail themselves of this security under commercially reasonable standards, we are asking for a two (2) year extension in deference to the anticipated construction time for the residential building.Thus,without an extension of the approvals for all three (3) entitlements, our ability to complete the garage would remain impaired. Block 77 holds three (3) different development approvals for which extensions are requested. The extension request must be heard before three different boards. These complexities are further evidence that Worthing Place differs from other projects and why more time is necessary for a project of this magnitude. If any fee is required pursuant to this request,please let us know and the proper fee will be forwarded to you immediately. Please also let us know all respective dates that these extension requests will be heard. I am confirming with you that the Conditional Use Extension request for Block 77 will be heard by the City Commission, that the Site Plan Extension request for Block 77 will be heard by the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board and the Block 69 parking garage site plan will be heard by the Historic Preservation Board. We respectfully request that the City Commission hearing be scheduled first,the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board be scheduled second and the Historic Preservation Board be scheduled third. Thank you very much for your consideration of the foregoing. Very tr our r Mi a I S.Weiner MSW:ek:vf Cc: Susan Ruby, Esquire . Mr.William Morris Mitch Kirschner, Esquire Jason S. Mankoff, Esquire Ms. Ashlee L. Vargo O:\MORW008\FL.ADOCS-1241953v3(Version 4).DOC £..�'f, t` ---,: tRr mot- f .-.G-,. a�!� -7, -� _ .... Y z e. • }. 14IS9ORi€PRESERVAFIONBOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: January 17, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: ill.C. ITEM: Consideration of COA-430 and Variance-72 Which Incorporates a Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Architectural Elevations, and Variances Associated with Block 69 - Municipal Parking Garage, Located on the West Side of S.E. 1st Avenue, Approximately 250 Feet South of East Atlantic Avenue. 1 ____I !ill 11 11 I N.W. 2ND ST_ ST N-E. 2ND ' illN t i --lilt Et] GENERAL DATA: N z W I NW. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. Owner/Applicant Block 77 Development Group, L.C. Z PI , Agent Michael Weiner, Esquire WFocation West side of S_E. 1st Avenue, Z a approximately 250 feet south of East Atlantic AvenueISCHOOL SQUARE1Property Size 0.45 Acre ATLANTIC AVE1 1E Future Land Use Map Other Mixed Use I I Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School Square 1 I 1 1 I I / Historic Arts District) :• . Adjacent Zoning__..North: OSSHAD // .. East: OSSHAD i j 4 ` a South: OSSHAD ■ Ill West: CBD (Central Business District) I S.W.1ST ST_ S.E 1ST ST. Existing Land Use Single family residence and vacant I z 11: ' parcels _ �—_� l Proposed Land Use Construction of a 207-space i - �- W parking garage with associated ■ � landscaping. •s Water Service n/a. S.W. 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND ST. Sewer Service n/a. 1 i 1I I 14 ?) S.W. 3RD ST .E_ - S 3RD w L. xv -- it C • : _- -- � ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is approval of COA-430, which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; and ❑ Architectural Elevations. ❑ Demolition of two contributing structures; and, ❑ Variance to the following requirement: LDR Section 4.3.4(K) — A request to reduce the front yard setback from 10' to a minimum of 1'; and the rear yard setback from 10' to a minimum of 5'-6". ❑ Waiver to the following requirement: LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(2)—A request to reduce the required open space requirement from 10% to 8.3%. BACKGROUND The subject property is located on the west side of SE 1st Avenue, approximately 225' north of SE 1st Street. The .41 acre site consists of Lots 20, 21 and 22, a Subdivision of Block 69, and is located within the Old School Square Historic Arts District, which is subject to the regulations as outlined in the CBD (Central Business District) zone district. Lot 20 contains a one story single family dwelling and accessory structure and Lots 21 and 22 are vacant. The structures are to be demolished as part of this development proposal. At its meeting of August 30, 1999, the City Commission and CRA held a joint work session with respect to the contracts for the development proposal known as Worthing Place. During the meeting there were numerous concerns raised with regard to the improvements to Worthing Park, the project density, and the time frame for construction. There were also discussions regarding the developers proposal to potentially increase the number of units up to 236 due to the construction costs with the subgrade public parking. Subsequent to the work session, various changes were made to the plan which included construction of a parking garage (this proposal) to replace parking spaces for the GRIP Building, public surface parking spaces, and the elimination of most of the sub-grade parking that was associated with Worthing Place. All of the units that were to be located on this property were transferred to Block 77 east side of SE 1st Avenue. The public parking and the GRIP parking spaces that are to be eliminated with the Worthing Place development are to be replaced by a 202-space parking garage on Block 69 (subject property). The garage will be constructed by the Block 77 Group and deeded over to the City. The draft agreements were modified accordingly, and included a clause that construction of the Block 77 development could not occur until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the parking garage on Block 69 and the garage is deeded to the City. The 202 space parking garage will provide 95 parking spaces for the GRIP building, which are 45 spaces more than HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 2 are currently in the GRIP parking lot. The garage will also contain 107 public parking spaces that will be available 24 hours a day. In addition, 40 of the GRIP spaces will be available for public use from 6:01 p.m. through 7:59 a.m. Monday through Friday and 12:01 p.m. Saturdays through 7:59 a.m. on Mondays. It is noted with the current proposal that 207 parking spaces are proposed to be consistent with the final contract agreement. In October 1999, conditional use applications were submitted to allow the residential units to exceed 30 units per acre (219 units) and to allow a building height up to 60'. In conjunction with the conditional use applications, a text amendment to the OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zoning district regulations was processed to include Lots 19-24, Block 69, Town of Linton, as properties that could be developed per the CBD zoning district regulations. The purpose of the LDR amendment was to accommodate the GRIP/public parking structure. On November 2, 1999, the City Commission approved the sales contract and associated agreements to allow the proposal to go through the development review process. At a pre-application meeting on February 2, 2000, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed the development proposal. They noted concerns with the "fortress-like" appearance of the structure, and indicated that they would support variances to the front and rear property lines if the facades could be varied and offset to provide a better overall design of the building. On May 24, 2000, the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board approved the residential structure on Block 77 and its associated parking garage. The municipal parking garage to be located on Block 69 within the OSSHAD zone district is the action now before the Board. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal incorporates the following: ❑ Demolition of the contributing 1949 dwelling and accessory structure; ❑ Construction of a five level parking garage containing 207 parking spaces; ❑ Reconstruction of a 5' wide sidewalk within SE 1st Avenue right-of-way along with the installation of decorative street lights; ❑ Installation of a bike rack within the garage; and ❑ Installation of associated landscaping around the perimeter of the site. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: As stated in the background section of this report, the subject property is zoned OSSHAD zoning district, however is located in a geographical area that can be developed under the HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 3 CBD zoning. The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the CBD zoning district: Standard Proposed Maximum Building Height 48' 38' Minimum Building Setback See Variance Analysis Below Front 10' 1' Rear 10' 5'-6" Side Interior Bldg. 0' 0' Setbacks Minimum Open Space See Waiver Analysis Below 10% 8.3% Variance Analysis: Building Setbacks: While the parking garage structure complies with the side interior setback of 0', the front and rear setbacks of 10' has not been maintained and a variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) has been requested. The variance request includes a reduction in the front yard setback from 10' to 1' and 10' to 5'-6" for the rear yard setback. Pursuant to Section 2.4.7(A)(5), the Historic Preservation Board must make the following findings prior to granting a variance: (A) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings subject to the same zoning (The matter of economic hardship shall not constitute a basis for the granting of a variance); (B) That literal interpretation of the regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties subject to the same zoning; (C) That the special conditions and circumstances have not resulted from actions of the applicant; (D) That granting the variance will not confer onto the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other lands, structures, and buildings under the same zoning. Neither the permitted, nor nonconforming use, of neighborhood lands, structures, or buildings under the same zoning shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance; (E) That the reasons set forth in the variance petition justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and, (F) That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with general purpose and intent of existing regulations, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The applicant has provided a justification statement as follows: HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 4 "Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to this land and are not generally applicable to other lands subject to the same zoning. This land is subject to a final order of the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach approved January 6, 2000, which among other things states that the public parking and parking for the GRIP Building that currently exists on Block 77 shall be replaced in the proposed Block 69 parking garage pursuant to the terms and conditions of the CRA/Block 77 Development group Contract. No other property in the Old School Square Historic Arts District is subject to such a final order, which makes the property unique. The literal interpretation of the regulations would deprive the applicant of what is commonly enjoyed by other properties subject to the same zoning. The CRA/Block 77 Development Group Contract which is referenced in the Final Order calls for the completion of 207 parking spaces, the majority of which are to be dedicated to the public as part of a municipal parking garage. The zoning for this particular property allows for the building of such garage in such size and capacity. To be able to build in accordance with appropriate zoning standards is a right commonly enjoyed by other property owners. The literal interpretation of the setback regulations would deprive this owner of being able to build in that manner. This is a right commonly recognized by the Historic Preservation Board. For example, other setback variances have been given in order to allow a building envelope, which would have otherwise been allowed under the zoning standards but would have resulted in less than aesthetically pleasing structures. The special conditions and circumstances that make this particular variance necessary have not resulted from the actions of the applicant. The conditions of the Final Order passed by the City were debated at a great number of public hearings and imposed by the City's Order. Obviously, the applicant would prefer to build a smaller garage or no garage at all but is now subject to this Final Order. The granting of this variance will not confer onto the applicant any special privileges that are denied to others in the same zoning. As stated before, setback variances have been granted to others in similar zoning districts. A relief from setback is not a privilege, which is out of the ordinary. Anyone in similar circumstances would be viewed in a similar way. The applicant and petition has set forth a number of different reasons for granting the variance. To summarize first at a Historical Board meeting of February 2, 2000, in a workshop, certain suggestions on elevations and architecture were made to the applicant by both the board and the Planning and Zoning Department. Based upon their expertise, they made requests for vertically variegated surfaces, architectural relief to the sides of the building and interesting and varied design features. These comments were made based upon a belief that this would be the most appropriate way for a building of this nature to fit into the OSSHAD. This is the most important reason for granting the variance. In addition, the variance allows the use of the structure to be disguised. It enhances the interaction of pedestrians with the structure. It is in a more compatible design with the urban design principles for a downtown habitat. The property sits in a transitional area between a great number of structures without any setbacks whatsoever, and therefore is an appropriate compromise given its location. The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the existing regulations. The granting of the variance will not be injurious to the HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 5 neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. To the contrary, for all of the reasons stated above, this will actually enhance the neighborhood in that it will be improving the interface between the pedestrian and the use of the building, providing for off-street parking, effectively screened for view and will generally promote additional renovations and harmonious construction within the area. Pursuant to Section 4.5.1(J), in acting on variance requests the Board may also be guided by the following as an alternative to the above criteria: (1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenances, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site. (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of a historic site or a historic district. The applicant has provided a justification statement indicating they met these standards for the following reasons: (a) The variances are not contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. The parking garage has been considered a necessity for the downtown area for a number of years. In testimony given before various Boards and the City Commission, which approved this particular use, there was an agreement that a parking garage was in the public interest. Safety would be promoted by relieving the streets of parking congestion and the general welfare would be promoted in that additional parking would be available to the downtown businesses. The variances requested only relate to the façade of the building and to the use of street nodes for traffic calming. Neither of these issues in any way impedes the public interest, safety, or welfare. To the contrary, traffic-calming techniques enhance safety. (b) There are certain special conditions and circumstances, which relate to the historical setting of this particular building which are not applicable to other lands, which make these variance requests a necessity. The applicant and the City have gone to great lengths to disguise the ultimate use of the structure as a parking garage so that it will fit with the nature of the historic district. Flat walls would only create a box-like feeling for the structure. By granting a variance with respect to setbacks and therefore allowing a stepped-back façade, there can be much more creativity with respect to the elevations, further disguising the structure. With respect to the traffic calming nodes, a wide street HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 6 and straight sidewalk would inhibit a pedestrian feel for this particular structure. By requesting a reduction in pervious area allowing for pedestrian oriented enhancements, you would be giving the structure the appropriate relation it needs to the streetscape. (c) A literal interpretation of the provisions of the existing ordinances, not granting the variances, would result in the alteration of the historic character of the historic district. Without these variances, you would be left with a box-like structure, strait and narrow sidewalks, and a wider street. All of this runs contrary to the downtown look and feel, which includes varied facades, pedestrian friendly environments, and slow and deliberate traffic patterns for vehicles. (d) The variances requested are the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character. The variances do not in any way materially increase the size of the building. The variances requested are for the purposes of fitting a use into the environment in such a manner that it is almost undetectable and has no impact except for its intended benefits of removing parked cars from the street, allowing visitors to arrive, put their automobiles in a central location, and become part of the pedestrian orientation of the downtown. Open Space Waiver Analysis: As stated previously, the subject property is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District), and is located within a geographical area that is subject to the CBD (Central Business District) zone district development standards. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(2), within the CBD zone district the minimum open space requirement is 10% and only 8.3% open space has been provided. The applicant has requested a waiver from this requirement, which can only be granted by the City Commission. However, it is appropriate with the approval of the site plan that the Historic Preservation Board makes a recommendation on the request, which will be forwarded to the City Commission. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. The applicant has provided a justification statement, which indicates that: "It has long been considered an important goal to provide additional parking to the downtown area. In doing so, every effort is being made to build the parking structure in a manner, which allows it to be compatible with the surrounding downtown commercial area. Certain building features have been added to the elevations, including but limited to a variegated façade and certain other architectural features. In doing so, it has been necessary to decrease the amount of open space. Therefore, increasing the HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 7 compatibility of the structure with the surrounding area is the justification for granting this waiver". The request involves an open space requirement, and does not affect the provision of public facilities. The waiver would be granted in other similar situations where the City would require the installation of façade features. Therefore the granting of the waiver will not result in the grant of a special privilege. It is further noted that reductions in open space are allowed in other zoning districts such as the AC (Automotive Commercial) and PCC (Planned Commerce Center). While effecting the neighboring area, the reduction in open space results in a façade that is more compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. It is also noted that the same amount of landscaping can be provided in the reduced setback to buffer the building as would have been provided in the 10' as the balance of the area would most likely have been sodded. Based on the above, staff supports the waiver request. OTHER ISSUES: LDR Section 6.1.3 (Sidewalks): Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the right-of-way adjacent to the property. A 5' sidewalk exists along SE 1st Avenue, however that sidewalk is to be modified and placed totally within SE 1st Avenue right-of-way. LDR Section 5.3.1 Reduction in Right-of-Way Width: Per LDR Section 5.3.1 right-of-way dedications to meet minimum standards must be made with all developments, unless a waiver is granted. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), the required right-of-way width for SE 1ST Avenue is 60' and 40' currently exists. For existing streets where the right-of-way does not meet the minimums, reductions may be granted by the City Engineer upon a favorable recommendation from the Development Management Services Group (DSMG). The City Engineer and DSMG have reviewed the request for a reduction in right-of-way width with the Worthing Place development proposal and at that time determined that the existing right-of-way width of 40' is sufficient for SE 1st Avenue. Unity of Title: The development proposal includes separately platted lots. As the site is to be a unified development, a Unity-of-Title for the property is appropriate. Submission of a recorded Unity- of-Title is included as a condition of approval. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS Along SE 1st Avenue, the vertical elements include Sabal Palms, Glaucous Cassia, Pigeon Plum, Winin Palm and Pigmy Date Palms. Ground covers include Green Shell Ginger, Cocoplum, Philodendron, Zanadu, Croton, and Bougainvillea. This same palette of plant materials is to be provided along the west elevation. In order to maximize Xeriscape principals, no sod is proposed for this development and therefore meets the intent of the landscape ordinance. • HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 8 DEMOLITION ANALYSIS The house was constructed in the Minimal Traditional style in 1949 and is therefore contributing to the historic inventory of the Old School Square Historic District. The house is a prefabricated or often called "factory built'. Most probably the house was built by Coastal Homes of West Palm Beach a distributor of Flury & Crouch, a manufacturer of factory built homes. There were a number of these factory built houses constructed in the City shortly after WWII. One of the few still existing is the Stahl office building located at 138 N. Swinton Avenue. The small structure to the rear of the lot was moved to the site from the southwest corner of E. Atlantic Avenue and SE 7th Avenue in 1959. The age of the building is not known however it is shown on the 1922 Sanborn map. It is also a contributing structure to the OSS built inventory. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), The HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing on the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. The structures would not fulfill the criteria for individual listing in the National Register, nor do they represent a level or design or craftsmanship in order to request the structures to be saved. However, they are contributing structures to the Old School Square built inventory. It is therefore recommended that the main house be relocated and the cost of the demolition be applied to the relocation cost of the structure, and the small structure demolished. DESIGN ELEMENTS The front façade is asymmetric in form. Two squared towers in the center of the façade house the stairwell. The towers flank the pedestrian entrance, which is accented with two short columns that support a wooden pergola. The prominent cornice squared towers, substantial columns and wood pergola lend an Italian Renaissance element to the overall design. The columns between the front center towers are too short and dwarfed by the towers and diminish the pedestrian entrance and should therefore be modified. The score lines under the parapet and on the tower are to be tile. The cartouches on the center of the stair towers are stucco. Canvass awnings are to be provided over the window openings and decorative aluminum railing is to be provided in some of the openings. Raised stucco banding is to be HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 9 provided in the center of the building, which is similar to the detail at the top of the building. The proposed colors of the building are to be a combination of peach and white walls with blue awnings. Scale of Building: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(7), the construction of new buildings or structures shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color and location of adjoining sites. The property to the north is under utilized. Development standards would allow a maximum height of 48', which could result in a structure equal to or greater in proportion and mass then this proposal. Located in the immediate vicinity of the subject property is the 48' high GRIP building, the 32' high Masonic Lodge building, and the approved height of 58' for Block 77. The parking garage will have a height of 38' with the towers extending to 48' which is either similar or lessor scale and massing than surrounding buildings. This structure while greater in mass and size than the adjacent uses to the south and west, will act as a transition between structures to the north and east. As discussed in other sections of the report, the applicant has gone too great lengths to provide varied building materials and textures to enhance compatibility with adjacent properties. This is achieved by a façade, which is unique for a parking structure. Visual Compatibility: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), all improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of height, front façade proportions, window openings, rhythm of solids to voids, rhythm of buildings on streets, rhythm of entrance and porch projections, materials, texture, color, roof shapes, walls of continuity, scale of building. As discussed throughout this report and above, in order to increase the visual compatibility of the building, great strides have been made to create a building design that is compatibility with its surrounding environment. The architectural design of the garage with Italian Renaissance elements, different forms (projections in stair wells and flat walls), textures (stucco walls and wood pergola), different materials (stucco, tile, canvass awnings, aluminum railings), and varied roof heights all help to increase the continuity with the existing and proposed structures in the area. Based on the above a positive finding can be made to LDR Section 4.5.1(E). REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the following areas: HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 10 Section 3.1.1 (A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of OMU (Other Mixed Use) and is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). The OSSHAD zone district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. The proposed municipal parking garage is allowed as a permitted use in this geographical area of the OSSHAD zone district [ref: 4.4.13 (B)(3)]. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to consistency with the Future Land Use Map designation. Section 3.1.1 (B) - Concurrency: The development proposal involves a parking garage and does not involve concurrency issues. However the traffic circulation in the area will change as a result of the Worthing Place project and the associated municipal parking garage. This item was discussed in the Worthing Place staff report and summary of the changes in traffic circulation patterns are discussed below. Although the Worthing Place development is neither subject to traffic concurrency nor limited by conventional level of service thresholds as it is located in the TCEA, off-site impacts are expected to the intersections of Swinton, 1st, and 2nd Avenues and Atlantic Avenue. The AM peak period characteristics of the residential use (7 AM — 9 AM) are of minimal concern, as it will not conflict with the peak AM hour for Atlantic Avenue, which occurs between 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM). The project's greatest traffic impact will occur during its PM peak period (4 PM — 6 PM) which overlaps with the downtown's PM peak of 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM. The increased congestion was anticipated and accepted with the adoption of the TCEA designation for the downtown area. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, when all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval are addressed. Section 2.4.5 (F)(5) - Compatibility (Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bordered on the north, south and west sides by OSSHAD zoning and CBD on the east. The adjacent land uses include: to the north an office, to the south single family residence; to the west by an alley, single residences, and hair salon; and to the east a municipal parking lot, which is the future site of Worthing Place Apartment building. HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 11 Compatibility with the surrounding uses is a concern given the proposed height of the building. The proposed height of the building to the top of the 4th level will be 38' at the north end and 32' at the south end. The height of the building will be compatible with the 48' high GRIP building, the 32' high Masonic Lodge building which fronts along Atlantic Avenue, and the future 58' proposed Worthing Place development to be located across SE 1st Avenue. To the west, across the alley are single story buildings including single family residences and a hair and nail salon. The single family dwellings are buffered by a 6' wood shadow box fence and the parking for the salon backs-out onto the alley. Immediately to the north is a single story office building (conversion from a single-family residence) that also contains a vacant lot. This property is under utilized and will most likely be redeveloped in the future with a more intense use. The existing zoning allows a maximum height of 48'. Along the south property line, the garage contains a zero setback with a solid wall. This wall has been scored to give the parking garage facade an appearance of windows and the height of the building has been lowed from 38' to 32'. This helps to provide some relief to the façade and an overall feeling of less mass to the building. It is also noted that a site plan was processed for the conversion of this single family dwelling to a commercial use which has since expired. It can therefore be concluded, that this property is also under utilized and will undergo a conversion to a more intense use in the future. The municipal parking garage is a much-needed use in the downtown area and will help to elevate the unsightly surface parking areas located to the east. Allowing the parking garage to be built on the subject property will allow for the construction of a private/public parking garage in a location that will help satisfy the parking demands of the adjacent 4-story office building, Old School Square, nearby restaurants, and various other commercial establishments in the area. The garage is an important component of the Worthing Place project, a mixed-use development that will help fulfill the need for year-round residents in the downtown area. In this regard, the parking garage will help to fulfill Comprehensive Plan Policies that are described below. Based upon the above, a finding of compatibility can be made that the garage will not have a detrimental effect on the adjacent and nearby properties. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable objectives and policies have been identified. Future Land Use Element: Objective A-1: - Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate and complies in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is complimentary to adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs. The property is partially developed and contains a single-family dwelling and accessory structure, which is to be demolished as part of this development proposal. There are no special physical or environmental characteristics of the land that would be negatively impacted by the proposed municipal parking garage. Further, the intensity is appropriate as noted under the Compatibility section of the report. The development will be complimentary with the surrounding commercial developments and residential uses as it will eliminate many HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 12 of the existing blighted surface parking lots and provide organized parking in one location. In terms of fulfilling remaining land use needs, as discussed below, the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan states that the City shall be the lead agency in pursuing the construction and operation of tiered paring structures with mixed uses in the CBD. Policy C-4.1: The Central Business District (CBD) zoning District regulations shall facilitate and encourage rehabilitation and revitalization and shall at the minimum, address the following: ➢ Accommodating parking needs through innovative actions. Policy C-4.3: The City shall be the lead agency in pursuing the construction and operation of tiered parking structures with mixed uses in the CBD. Locations of parking facilities shall follow the CBD Development Plan required through Policy C-4.2. In order to construct the Worthing Place mixed use project, it is necessary to eliminate existing municipal surface parking lots and parking that is associated with the GRIP office building. The parking garage is a result of a public/private partnership and meets the intent of this policy relating to accommodating parking needs through innovative actions. The CBD plan as required through Policy C-4.2 has not been written to date. While Block 69 is located in OSSHAD zone district, it is one of the properties that can be developed per the CBD zoning district regulations. Based on the above, the intent of these policies have been met. Housing Policy A-12.3: In evaluating proposals for new development or redevelopment, the City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. This project is located within the first block of the downtown, which is largely commercial in nature. There is a residential structure located to the south and west of the property located across the alley, however, these areas are zoned for mixed or commercial uses, and several conversions from residential to commercial use have occurred or have been proposed in recent years. The nearest predominantly residential neighborhood is located south of SE 2nd Street. The parking garage in itself does not generate trips, therefore the impact will be negligible and will not affect the stability of any residential neighborhood (see discussion under Concurrency Page 6 of this report). The project will generate odors and noise associated with motor vehicles. In a downtown setting this generally is not a concern and will be consistent with that which occurs in the surrounding area on a regular basis. It is noted, that the structure may in fact block some of the noise that is generated by downtown outdoor entertainment venues from being heard by residents to the west. HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 13 Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 — Bicycle parking and facilities shall be required on all new development and redevelopment. Particular emphasis is to be placed on development within the TCEA Area. Bicycle parking is provided within the parking garage just south of the main entrance. Therefore this policy has been addressed. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of October 26, 2000, the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) recommended approval of the development proposal. Downtown Development Authority: While the project it not located within the DDA boundaries, the project was provided to the DDA for a courtesy review. At its meeting of October 18, 2000, the DDA recommended approval of the development proposal. Public Notices: Formal public notice has been provided to property owners within a 500' radius of the subject property. Courtesy Notices: Courtesy Notices were provided to the following homeowner and civic associations: • PROD (Progressive Residents of Delray) • Presidents Council • Chamber of Commerce • Osceola park • Community Redevelopment Agency Letters of objection and support, if any, will be presented at the HPB meeting. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal is to demolish the existing single family dwelling and accessory structure and to construct a 207-space municipal parking garage. The proposal is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. While the proposal involves a variance from setback requirements and a waiver to the open space requirement, relief from the Land Development Regulations is necessary to accommodate a municipal parking garage in the most efficient manner and provide the maximum number of parking spaces as well as a varied building façade. Consistency with Chapter 3 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations will be achieved provided the conditions of approval are addressed. HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 14 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve COA-430 and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) of the Land Development Regulations, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to conditions. C. Deny COA-417 and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) (Setbacks) and Section 4.4.13(F)(2) Open Space. STAFF: RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Demolition Based upon the guidelines of LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1) for evaluating requests for demolition approve the demolition of the structures located on Lot 20, however delay the demolition of the main structure for six months (July 17, 2000) in order to allow the applicant time to look for a site to relocate the structure. Variance 1. Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5) and LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1) grant a variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to allow a minimum of 1' front yard setback. 2. Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5) and LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1) grant a variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to allow a minimum of a 5'-6" rear yard setback. Waiver Recommend to the City Commission approval of a waiver to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(2) to reduce the required 10% open space to 8.3% open space based upon positive findings pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(D)(5). Site Plan: Approve COA-430 and the associated the Class V site plan for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) of the Land Development Regulations, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. That a Unity of Title is recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 15 2. That after the parking garage obtains a Certificate of Occupancy, that it be deeded to the City prior to the start of construction of the Worthing Place apartment complex. Landscape Plan: Approve COA-430 and the associated landscape plan for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, based on positive findings with respect to Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations. Design Elements: Approve COA-430 and the associated design elements for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.18 and Section 4.5.1(E), subject to the condition that the columns in front of the building be modified to be more in keeping with the balance of the building. Attachments: • Appendix A, Appendix B • Survey, Site Plan, Floor Plans, Landscape Plan, Building Elevations • HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 16 APPENDIX A STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Appropriate separation of travelways is made for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians in a manner consistent with objective D-1 of the Traffic Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open Space enhancements described in Open Space and Recreation Objective B-1, are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. That any street widening associated with the development shall not be detrimental upon desired character and cohesiveness of affected residential areas. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent HPB Staff Report Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage—Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations and COA-430 Page 17 F. Vacant property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent G. In order to provide for more balance demographic mix, the development of "large scale adult oriented communities" on the remaining vacant land is discouraged. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent .;, 1'fit;. /POcf r //l.e,' ',/O e//lei/i'Z/, 'E.5' �� = /6' ,4CCE✓ .e/G'i//p/-,c ,4// —a'` - I / S , D ' / ', ird /,,E,I z' rr �/a„,-,-,,, LEGEND:v J�E/5/B��/,�',,{ SO' is k 5 a' -1'^- Sp' '•; — Q = CENTERLINE OF RIGHT OF WAY • /rPOF/.POQ I e`.a - /B.4' tt ,0)/ '+ >:.. )� 56/ 5/t'/.Q0,4/ "conc." = CONCRETE f✓/7,ea, I s �� /5l"OP1' �11�/ 41" 8353/ 19, F aao Zd,✓E: X a'LB353 Bd/ca//✓6 \,1 4H S'' rat li I at 1�4 DESCRIPTION: 0 LOTS 20. 21, AND 22, SIIDDIVISION OF BLOCK 69, / i -;-- / ;- / -+ / / i r / i/ i - ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT ,;/ '/r • `.•/ /./J / F r-• / /% // i / ' /-J +� r- ,,•=//+ -._' BOOK PAGE as OF THE PUBI.IC`RECORDS OF PALM V / BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, r O D D / ' atra BOUNDA.RYSURVEY it,•. / 5 fdQ✓ \ i':i : e Ceer///t T . ti F'Es/oEn/C� H y 'U ti� "' �'zz /55' a Q c E l/,!/7W ,d c 9'✓P G rPv✓, ,C/c. ` ° coo ✓ C lG / /�o/5>0.,4(/+ 'i%.Ft3'L''S'!/S,Qrf f 28.0' ,6.r tj MAA/OEL/ 7/l44 '/l' ;,, O/At '; '•le' �. ,,,ce✓r. ...�q.Vr17 ,.. ATrD'P.VFYS' >/rCE ;rt/S!J ,S+t/CG F6/rl/O//,e/e, a Y?; e rEos \ .: 5E/5/B" p ,\ + /A'O,✓,ef° o q h h v 5`�5�a/�C� WPM/ r,EnnfV tint ui.h aurvny r.s made wider my ro Pon.lb 1. ch.r and meet+ the Ills lmwn technical St anderds a, sat forth by the rlcr Id C . f3 tq �:,. h Q -a Board of motes a Ions Lend Survolor. In Cheater F1011•6, rim'Ide f �,'i/d///Y C'AP 00 T Q oo .Q00 11///rS'(:O Adminielr.tivs code, pursuant to Sartlnn 412.021. rinrlde Flatutse. o'LB353\ tq Wine" \ `r- 'd'CB35.3 D.3'yd. QQ /N/rf.e rl,l d' ring not ti.!� lAr 6All'/F+✓A<.Cf SO 0' �,— 5D 5d without I _....._. "----- .mho.., / '' _5E/C P0�5 THOMAS E.ADAMS { 6i I L o PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR&MAPPER C n t4 �p el d /lruvr'x/V ' M N / 5 'I FLORIDA CERTIFICATE N0.3489 y, il. O'BRIEN, SUITER O'BRIEN INC. `� `` ?9' y' �A6/i�G ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS {:,,. :i•e,i'. . ,'Ka! / • 2601 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA `p�1 ' yi � w.,h atns+oet suit: //� , • rVOc/'. / 9.0 / — 24 it ' `y�� oapft Mo, v D COPY(1101 f 1991 BY rl'RR!£N, SUI/£R dr OWN, INC. ,ie3w/75O•' C',9/1.G/4. .' ,. ' nnn eew: rco Icv.zogd • r";' r. A. t. i, TE ri i as aKAU . —1nI 1 ' _ _.—.—._.--._.— . 4b?�.!.—.—.—._._. _ ,sO,OO' —._�_ _ _ —._ far Y'LOCATION YAPa I (WIMP!) . . 11 li ill 00 WORTH 0 0 qjqpp C ir7}•' T PTE TAPAATVA{/S� f ...,. we T1•••. ..:!;• l;. laiy 'e lb /////// P — ,.:rrv— .•.� d r` v u r tr. I �°'r j ril ,.,:.,, MLMO 4 sit wouATpef ,1.1 ly ud 4d �> i i , 1 �� i i } 1 u.l )I� rt, ..." .•r > ' c O ad v ad •d ad - ad L al�.ra u wr aP. /~%� % J7��ppyy� I a�l.l,� a• —� • • ! CB@y ra,L j W�GMC. 1 i 't: ,... •Itara Awrfa.i 5 O L�7 GG „,h k T woe art*wow( {(!! u.C. 7 O O 5 yyy ` Aj Tg1.111: it '„1- m,.•..a..nnn,utA .fm ////////l 5 LEVEL. • •.• Ill II n._ 4 a 44 .; • PARKING GARAGE •• H f ` 2ir.$11�1 G SEE AAO CfUAL Pt*3 °P�� foR anus a vA•aw tntLs fil I. 6201 e• stocm OMVI UP111 taaot le "V t•.oa aWni a Ir � ill Laf L r P I'I :rytI'_____0• LOT Ia coma M W it 1 ( ,ecis ..n�•.•�R i�Iyli/�Pam/Sglr b. �- we•I Rb 11W T•w Ka :lit Y 71 rR:.Oaa,I MM f..t• �' w.C. ' 5y t •(�C [] O TYPICAL PARIONC SPACES au �, • ,n g a �I wall. =22•22 2••4i.) W ® [I W at Vm 1 K Y 1•ita P.M INN�t1RLIJ • ji.. .7J. :..v, ',::a virwu•�iniwrs...r.".asr..c n.c. / I o 0 o c.. o Q oRr f3? If, �.G / 1wr I II �Z C i 'rz /////// ud , e.w uuV aa,l I;d .:<•:: �;.: :;.` I Q [I lig ;pi ! • 1,I ON.••-t \ UP I 1 • -ia. . f.a .•...•....., (1.0. ' .• CO - II VP.fir. —C-�.�"�' ON-^I UP^�\ re. u•,.•..a a a.al f..M �J.�V r f - rr I — 'i� ^' a f� {Mrrat/iaai At OaY.O1O.. ham' y 4•J�'. 4 y t•� ,y. , Y NORR rut �� 7 WI —, r I — S A 1 —I p UWf. TTRCN.ITRQT L 1T fTAWAIIDIau M 0 7 i/h I Airi� \� ������CrEMLI���E�N�� [ t `1 ' ; I S. E. 1st AVENUE I ' it•. , :, I aad.MT-d-rYa +E:;' .i4' •nwf fgPa•Ir a T,.� — — — — —�— — --t — — — Q- — — I — — i— I it ,::: ,,,,• 5 : Mil r PLANTE" I r KAM ). 0 re ......,..,..,..,....., , , ,;:ic.; .;.;,, 1 ,,.„ ,.,IL : 1-,,,,-.74(,, I I I I II f al I 1 , 1 1 I I i I I I . I II I I I-1.1 77101. i- -1 1.1.1 j. -1. 'TT— i"'' ''�,I i',., (WWIUK-.a.flmaa RAM iOOf Tf i �_ - STREET U T TYP corm_ I 1\ :.,„ r,;ar,: .ate.. , I ( : ca,aiil,-s .. .,zuc . ..........: a • .P'- _ • `at♦`aM`ua IOY`[4 -. ti 1 i r.IN NI WWI �wr.rua • 1 —.a— �——_ g — a41.41 `.. ____...,_,...„...r... I„ .:,.......y,s_. ._ lica3-=)===I I ''.1 L:-.. i:.!' .4,!...ift..M.,,.. .g31 11111d1.1 11.1.11 1!',1.•:.'.: ';',‘ ,i... .er.... 1,125._:.-...._/- ..":7:-.Z. j Z fUl - ::� `a �II� _iiiiiii 1:1.11k-.11 �I�I. yOIL O I :fn 1. NM* •ImEa !BMW 1.4 w mim jrs""° e y '' Mina • OEAST TLE_VATION �' r.r Or•r Oi SOUTH ELEVATION H ,y 7.••,,... "., .* b.s ylr.I� r I LI Tfi- I ' ::, cti` ,'Sh y„ r± 1M: r 41 . 01 14'1. 1f Y lW C' S1e f. r ti c� I ' 'I . �drr 6 bL'�` t ;.,),,,,..,.. ;,.. :, ,, ,°w"7"-: — = 10 I Mail e__..— deD. J M w— .'' ton Dm r 1 1 I �I I tire "_ \ O � i IO , M wit � • o a� IL wawa. `n`1 MN I DnrDCk. i` ------- ----------- I l $ g DC i U.A 14 J. +7 'i ry17;• ONORTH ELEVATION • WEST ELEVATION 4-i {oso f ?Crl:.;::r, fi'. N bL or•I4 1u`I/ I� MOW I a3" . t b'', '','")..;, ',,),),..•4.... =,:',f4 ,I,1',,•.;r.,,;.‘2;',,;1 If.:: t,,,,,,•,:::.e.‘. ., IkI MI .'•(.. s'qc,11„:Y ,I./ 1IY130 Mad OA 1112DA MAIN• 'i. • I , I-V ..., . .?. ,...I 11 AM (MIN WM TI NM 1111 KA///all II PI/II MOI SIM TIMM 1 .4/11-.• ANY T.111 IMAM II TS OSA NAN.111111121011101•t AX .... 41) np.mirlarn, ta=11........KKKKKK AVOW 0111-A I AN 1.•MA It PM 113.7•71110113.t 71 ISM 12114 0 11171 inn ...., On on Ad sl as le a own mows NI VI 111r11 Ma II I WINO ".1'..,..t 41 'On 71111171 Mg It /1•11 MU ''4 41 irs las At• of ?Silt DWI• I 111.311.141 • MCIX 11:i MN 1$ Mt 9,I E .6-..•AA wet NVid o nil ri y 8.1 .1,.1•AA Mon -13A31 HIelf10.1 : VIVO 31IS .7../•.110 MI -13A31 01:11RL ,,, — 0 Da PJ .„.......,../ --- •Drumg o o II ...„,,,.1:;:a3go. o o 1..,.... ,m•—.J wall•v W.;:3;;;:g •3 0 •;;;!;;;2 '':;tj7:111.:itil i ,ei ,, Pr•IZI .--. ....,...-. •••-•-•-•'--- M111:::d n"''• O 11. II IllaT3 6""" tfr4 0 51,c, k,4, -•-..-•-•---. .-._. .__•-.-.-.-. • - _........_........_........ 1 . 1 ('''•;"'''::•' ' i Da. = -.._ .7_ -__ _- -.._ =:Z:_:::::-__ -___ -___..-: .bibb.. i 1....w. i $. :a•v,1 4,r; -•-•- - •-•-•-•- . 1, • i _._._._._._. ._._. , •-•-•-•- - trr COO tar .44-.4.4-.4.-4...4.- 46.43 ::-...- ..-7.. ..=.4:7. . , 1..•wytyl.1.10.12.st. . . . . . . . . ...._ -* = 0 1 ® ' =1171771) ° ' 'it, —.—.—•—•—•—• •—•—• .----.—.--.—.— 0.."'s I •I ® *MIS I • ''i,'• 1 i —•—•—•—•—•—•--•—•—•—• •—•—•—•—•—•— •••ruap.n- .—.111191_,IitilitaLIPL.11.— _._ 11111•11 I ID.: wir•s• 0 Oft: iro NO OK: , 1^ %ii,• f ii) 2,.......„...:::::::::...__... .....„....___,.. ...___,...„..:2..=.....:„..__ . 0 . ..,„ . . D0 - . ,,,, t -•-•-•-•-•-•--I-••-•-• •-•-•-•-•-•- liattAnt NOVA - ril '7,IIII: i.i44 T 1?...).." ---•—•—•---•--------• •—•—•—•—•—•— ==1=,== 0 0 • ....•.= =me, —._.—..._. .._. ..___ _.—._.—.—.- 1 , , 'i:(i'r' _10:4 •si,, ......—___. ..—__._..._.-_—..._.--_.—._._ ------- -----Orr—awr.w--1---------- 1 1 1 i • 1 arts.sis a aw 11.1111.0-0 A 0= I I 0 aN -..--'•-• .---•• ••-•-••-•.---••-•--•-••.•••••••-• -••--. I I .n ', ;.144.,a,Ttlt 1 VD --•—•—• • •--•—•—•— n Int II• IT T• n ire-I• liu'l •• P @ tal.11.1mrli Nu)I.2 WI MAI ED A-J•J1/1777 'J,!, • ..!•;.?•.s,,t4,,, 1: .;:l: .,Si•,A/1 ral 3r00.,S lel TS AI-.I.,•Pfl WIIII IC' :*'•P.,,..1 V)I.% 13/%31 ON003S — N3113SVa .11110111 fi"I4',, •':41'::.5 O'f. 1 -S,A I 0,4 I .1,1, I .......1 1 .. . ....l• 411111111111L2=1:1111111111111111111111111111111Mh 1111/. '`A,•'''v 'I.N 1 ..1-0, I......./4 r J-P, I ...:-er I .....1 I .t-tat,.. 1 ;:..-..7......1.....1 E - s 11 4 in,"•111:111::::0, 0 a Ir4...4.4.91 n,... ---' 11111111111:1 li ......____ WI.1 i.7_-_—.:-allihi,:i .- 0 bi-14 0 E3 Iss,v. ":,tn.:'''. ;V ...,•e'.'')1' :.,', t ' . tr.•,p .,I 1-.AA,••••••••••• ,\A , I / 0 . t v, , ,, . L ari-k-,-.---, - , i 1! ;3 i -, , ,- , . • 1 .S.R t 0 D 11 el Ll, •:„..,- ' ' , g,l, — - .—_, o mtLiTi7D1 C" .sA t L:grrth77 7 0 0' F' — .., 4 - ;•- ,0 1-4 •••.... • n 0 1.4 mr. • Ell 0 1'1 • 0 0 , ' k;',): ,q; Z R 711 I !I n H 1 1 (1 0 ni j ,• CZ 101 , if I0313 I i-A II ICI IL 111 461:11 10:118 ' U 0.4A ill IIITTI MR lrrarliericir a.., 1 is 0 — 11,01 .1, .... MIMI kIlli • MIT dlu I • l' 11 1 1® 0 ' 1 r C)C11; . WNW I MIL 1 0 0 h it 1:5 '41 1 0" NAM Me 1 t ICTIOI 1•111"10 :..., MOO WI I =d=b1:1=1=i= El fo ....... , , ,... - 1 • fl "1 il • i 1 ti on .817trt-t olt A ern-F-211w , , Ir- 1 . IS n Ira'SO i I Inv* n 1 WI'01 ns• n 11 .,..,• 1........\.... ., re-Alf ^' PrI ...... J --.4 4 NA mono mama , A A • . TM' .),. '•1A A A ,11-- ..0-11, , '?'•'. PLANT LIST Orr PLANE AND S.ECIrIOA VON .(;i'4. `• ,,;� TREES AND— �pALliS 'al 4'1'.� . la'•lUr CD a CO eoloba dlv.rllrelle(Pigeon Plu„1 N 7000' •W a? 7 as mt url _ ra pt.3'c l• -e e t ell 11,lGleuc cr,Celllpl 00 _ rw e.le lit,�•a = „�y'aa:: so oa 7 ra,penl reelects,.fPlgny Dele Pelm) _ •� '_` n- ff •• 94,E tj Pl e M_fun I r —��' �w � M \l- T�� F7-I < Revl.,a le ma dpgeaae•Idu4 lirevele.' r 't•� IA-U In.bevy a Pe F., YC. \ L\CAG A� to a e.ba pameue ream re J [: ^}t7. ANDr 2 7e•Deslavered MI ea cn pit,' �1 I� \4:144 I • �// Wit' 'f ,dv !uoli I cl, I FJ I A IVell dda wlnln fn Palm) I 'Li 16.7e e.t.heavy I %►ify'� I SIt,,.. q•. aro SufyBS GROWDCOVERS AND • I nl11 ,_dCCENt6 I I }�,; :mx.( ALV F Alpinla THlfnbel'Vail I awy 7e'ht,7p'1 e9ela'(Vafl<geled E+MII GI. ii L1j t.. ALi 7 p.,full gerJ O 0 !-� laa 41pinla tenunbal IGre-n EJe,ll Ginge.l C O n DCU 4 e.ht- a full Il Bougelavlllee Purple'fOnugunvIllea vine farm) II1I r 701emu 2 e'M.NII,attach to well u!. BrwreUle g.endgloNa Presterdly today,tomorrow) O O O t�i �•a'�.NII, � • T CNR 67 Chyf balenuf Ice<o rCocncplunl 8 CLE • 74 ht.7.' pr•min,Nil 7 f 614 uerernd w q,nd'IIoc Ia.e s 9.ebVar 0 - .6,' , ,s, COD es IPA old.full 1 ,,LE, Cadm..n adage to,'merry Paint....lCr0100 74' M,IC'a NH .,t. I CRY 4 a tc,Iog a Tedegbeerlemry(Pubbn VInN I III - Jae ISO �' M. app vine elUrh to well - Ao.m onnt w I �. „r,., �'f ...„,. ..,, Jefmi..,.i velublle fWe.Ja.mhel 1 rRl IC N'ht.la•op,.74'o<,1 g.1, 0 1 irlpleeu.daelylotdn ae<ehateftee Cee•11 I �� Y.dN 6I 74'M.14'1p.full,e'Oe. I rI C. I Phn t.18'o en'Ye.30'oz le.!phlledendronl J O I le'ht.le'Ip..full.90'o< C 0 / ij Yi y n, 7 O O f W tl I+ 4emLT... v ' "' ••-•ip.+n u,.tn}.pxl.y,. T r"^ � O n ..w ra nmela fd yy.•yy • � 'CO ban.YI.tr,r•®ey Term.n "',.''.(. F R ''I^ry••14tl�~I.11•MYw N,blw-ry yC. '. lnr.a.sM�NIY MY 6.h 1♦�,.. ,r 1 w e�oYw,n.�� rtY wa,.,r.lhv..'°..,.I. � /// 1 SCALE,1'. it, �M nw °^r iM•.rh I A Coot, 1 .•.,I, n�nra la, ii.~ +"'/.' t••f•.'•+•nYs U Aff� L,. tT/h ®p I •a~i.�i.(' Ht l•.w.r'." WrC rte,WM.ni:�Yw.e t ,1 [III • rwRaa "^iM1,.,•un.,,w.tM<rirwpwulW rw,rne r.r N,a FJ r� 'LA • //e. I� 1 ' ^�dqe�b p4rN rM Nn fy� errp (IN-V.-WI rt ? ri; ee.v.,,/Wr:, .....1.4.“.arJ ..1r,�)an.'�I I,.-'���i ,,t.,A �\I ;����11u'fl ; ----...._. '/__ 7�I A%'t�, ,'�) I` �r�.e..irq '.�.;w.7:•.' "�; 01�. . ...��b�;iU111i�11 --.r_ ; EI�IIIE; '_� ® n Y.var.: M-...I-4 p,r.�r•.. ��G1'_._•.l n WollAi,/ 1�1/�11 �//-��S' a:o 1 7r p..•I� r..11. w..ar.Y� '•W r covcrtut..to p' lit Vt>r �,•iF. ti► i ' 11711 1.. ,r.bM1 .�"'t^' �Ibpy•y �„ C.rx.lYs' qS+Y� \.. �fe Z �,e�.-. �_..`..�r •♦ y t''9' fp' ., w„aa7er'nl YMfM.Ii •xn....Y u ..x1. 11:"'i.i t Fa,. �'r.�'�, ,T� AI\� C*�1�• Y.I�..,,.r,V7,1i3 �i.Ci`�C:�".Z:::tut,.. . .... ... ._.... — Is�.00'I' \� ',Nip :CO.,. „�11t1:AJ4'.► rcwc*frc..0 �F. � I I e•y��fr��wiw •+wYfw�y� �a • I E ��� .W p�,'y' •M•�wyr,Yb rd.lMWMr hwutr� I .✓ N +,°Xd....a.Y.Ra�wraoe..f ,� S. E. t s ! AVENUE E N U y, .rt•w,.n �„ a ), r'nbW M1p.af.,f.w .� •'/ I,'erClli- �ti;. m ! M`f�..tr t+•,.tN WrM\FJ A}awl — - Snx...1.0Cw.r) I U.bRiNl .11....,M Z •waM,athi 1` I IedPMyM1 _ I j EEA I ebfa�N Y' M.e,1.•re MMfKM11,t4f•.a.gN (L al!•n.,bhc..rd.r' n+%G•r«w1..F.n';.r. .[...., .1:: : '1. LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS +II ELRAYrElEAC od Y� D�{' ..... •. terµ ton .... �+.� .._ at•ar.nar..t..y 1,4,aw.1.p.•K,. nafe �n. i, LANDSCAPE. s-p�(�;D 11 ^,••••••." < ,on.. em.,ae lot...A ere •n• n. '•i: __ O [ w41O$.IOC 40 eKVO COW,"n!en.lp OIL ♦,n. '• f-_f1� O `/� P t �d'� .tr= x KKaer.twlax � fa fr. � t 6 .t'K�Kp•K�n•D,•Ttp MAP. •••••••. - D J� .,..� .� .1 IOr4 u,C14•a,ee•.t• G•11l1tl 1 FI ........-.w ' L. ........ w....—_ • t rOp14.mTOa)µblur.!AMR.tOl•tD w•WA y•t blela• 1. •4 RM.0•1l40 7AploC • . 't .h.-�....- •• !Ot4•elCOO Wb✓•T ue.x*xptD 4,11• ^ I.� I L t •.ttl ReaaC Tn. ....-: ..I..I I ..�...-r.-..'• `\, ` •.7..... F-n �•iuw. 't rorzt tMNRp,,a Pratt ntiv,ClD tl ,(I I\J~ ^•^ rCt41U' >•rM. if &I - ••••-+•• '_ 4YJ,CtaMM rt.,Rtf 4q..tp Y• •-• 1pt4•.f.e '•r7't.peril r-.O.,p[p P.M /(y�(�/'�/�///'' yt, rt•.�W H=y�1'= p 01µ yfTta C•.1.re PR•mrev!'Ire . M12tf �, I •,f ht•+et.aem.rp ' W 'rw'ee.o.u.nK lwrf..-..Dte •`t�� 'Z 1 er•l 1.4,1..O.11,ea R•e rw...C,C '4 A •nrtl !. 'l' i Ucuu1 aucH UCCItAIUUH HISTORIC`PRESER icarAy VATION BOARD III' MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT lulu 1'193 1JJ3 20U1 20UI Property Owner: Jude Endres/Landmark Development Group of P.B.C. Property Address: 137 NW 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District HPB Meeting Date: February 15, 2006 COA: 2006-127 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a COA request for the replacement of cedar shingle siding with Hardishingle siding on a contributing dwelling located at 137 NW 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of the south 1.5' of Lot 1 and Lot 2 less the south 3', Block 59, Town of Delray, Old School Square Historic Arts District, zoned OSSHAD. The property consists of a contributing structure built in 1921. f' A Class V Site Plan Application was approved with conditions by the Board in 2003. The application consisted of converting the 824 sq. ft. one-story, contributing, single family home to an office, demolishing an 867 sq. ft. one-story, contributing cottage/garage, constructing a 1,526 sq. ft. addition on the contributing building, and other required site improvements. One condition of approval, which pertains to this specific application, was that original architectural components be retained as follows: exposed rafter tails, consistent, rectangular gable vents, brick fireplace, wood shingle siding be retained, and that any new walls constructed have a smooth stucco exterior. The application before the Board is that of a material change regarding the exterior siding on the original structure. As previously noted, the structure contained wood shingle siding which was specified as a condition of approval that the same material be used and retained. However, the applicant requests that the Board consider the use of a "fake" wood shingle siding, called Hardishing le. ANALYSIS Development Standards LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a (�— historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, II or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. • 137 NW 1st Avenue COA 2006— HPB Meeting 02/15/06 (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of height, front facade proportion, proportion of openings (windows and doors), rhythm of solids to voids on front facades, rhythm of buildings on streets, rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections, relationship of materials, texture and color, roof shapes, walls of continuity, scale of building, directional expression of front elevation. The following criterion has not been met: (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The use of a faux material on a contributing structure is neither compatible nor appropriate under any circumstance. The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following: •Exterior sidings that simulate the look of wood siding may be authorized for use on a case-by- case basis, but is generally discouraged. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: • The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. •Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Analysis The proposed project consists of the replacement of the dwelling's existing wood shingle exterior siding with a "faux" material made to have the "appearance" of a wood shingle. This material is not consistent with the LDRs, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines nor the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, all of which have been noted above. Additionally, the retainment of the original material, not merely the look of said material, was specified as a condition of approval by the Board in 2003. The permitted use of this material on contributing structures would clearly be inconsistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation as well as the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. Therefore, positive findings cannot be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 137 NW 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 2 rz • 137 NW 15t Avenue COA 2006— HPB Meeting 02/15/06 C. Move denial of the COA for 137 NW 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Move denial of the COA for 137 NW 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Report Prepared by: Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner • Attachments: Location Map, Photographs • • • • • • ,'. fir .' • 4 + rat• 4 y r. rat I t. 'M.�tY 4'' "- �` ~` �dI s INS.N' '� � �, t• ' � t• w 4 aR. a ..^. _ tY ''y,[[�' 'Ci I i A dot ') '� 4� Q'� lir`7. .. * Jf Ite' a: t'4,,, ''t1'' •;t + A"` }lirr�x r •� rr �'i ',let'?"i y4 t ,e�t' Y r i' .k a • 1 C o-,,: 1 + rt i '' a� 5 ' 4 -, .f r get f: �0 q .. .r •. .4- .,4 yfi ky�•« :c ,,,..4 v T .d r t�)r *r' k6 #�fi d , r, r ' ' .c, t. „�i.. ✓ '• >'a� i�t 'S,`e.'d s". N. ':ig a w v� �4 .r A d l rh 7. '�• f"f u r ru$ 'a"i C'r'IrLs, d Cy + q{';S!P�' S , 'if 1� 4 . _ ti u-`f z* M, b.••:'-. d py �•t.T111 b'"•xl�R ' i �, _ E�?, ''Sm �r."t `..,� f . � SL �:" �. f".e z3 3,,. ,✓G Y G 4-1 ! i' �dr,3".3'.'3� t»uM v rr �`•.,,:', ,` �,,`,',T +* r�u L•4tr.. � d rr �A ' 1 iAV •N 4".^5n 'j'F ,'"`i .`nriNe t j '11. r ..S4j ti.^yat^y y'�a,Aa. iSr#•,l t • `��''=` "c«�" �''`w• "'4�` '��`'•Y9x a�'Ar S • ^4 r , , ,�y,"'n+ Y j a�4 pt ,C�r� U' r`,a„�j'��. 5. ;Y.tk-'y,�` t,.':'s,t,� i . ._� '-+i�"' .,j. 4,fr ��,w i . .' k+n �w �' r' ' If ,� E I `�k'N'�+," �'fu%x ',��r{ i. +1C 3t •t • • r ~+� I r I 'y Ar��`• � 1 *'4� e..�. �fr FF,-cfa� .N. , v'oe t f t I -tip � xi ,� i t t, 1!:! r?: 9 I '' ( d) r f ':P r hie �t' a� 1 • n r �`I •F p • ti..11' r . i. • • • ' h ° t� i: F: r ,.<4 hxz r;trt'' t *5 + agry., kr; ' .. I c. �'''t 1 u Y>.� ) r a 7 l y a i n*'D,�'ihal 4 3 1 R '' '9'Abr' a*"e Z 1 :/ ,�> m b w n 0i' k .0 a Ly �, f e�+'S'Y .•y ,�y:�r'w r s k Z.r S t @,.f„.r:. a 7Y,,. J Ir z ''E b d y,+1 P 'a 'tw x;, .., ` i A r 1 'i y .; � , �:� i,',•r d4 fafr. w Wti^6r 'rd�, dy Ck ! 7 a 1:u r4' t4i a IkftJ , ' y �- 4M �:, .t't `";•x,,,r cYl< i .t+.:: yd,. AM✓ e r �rr rG v r'r�"'�1 fiy�� f`�H,ry�'T `C r� ` ' r�y��i + ' . J e :^ �'.''":ta lP ;,;� r:. t< t a,yK '+fI.�✓x' o.f' c.k c I r••r .;; ": t z .. t '"' ..ram t' %'' ' z rr�< r •:';!';',:..''As;;.' .i r y1 i t'q. >. , . w. t �� t .,.-,, '.•. ��.i w,'�-�:pd `- r4 f�a 1 �.tr L,v ..... r -�^M� t .��; E 3. N x d,� r � 'iy�7q:�. � M��` y��i .b:t k� �, rt `, �f 'n �!, j,,,. `t'i.-T ttfy Y 5 Mti�'�t.:�W ,i , , E '.:, f,i.A N •':, Idrr�,�'"t Ay k;'4 " r°n' 4F Y,FU t�' „,..•„� 0 ,,,,,:h y: ,.,.t.r ga „ IY ""`rx. .F;C+y�iM rhxt tr .py { �r t ro t f,y f't r: r't A'0b�` t' '?:'f d a, x 5 .:,xx .9 r !• .:'`i 1 to v a fs t1, 1 I b �a F t y _ aCPa w •rP ' t. t i''A' i °411 Q t ,Gq r a �} .y a, F' � .'r ;*"r oyyyy r,.'.y7 v a.h ,,§. u i' ',.: a m q6 ' r. G '. .�_z ;";",�, y,•t.5 „ ;. ., E";r ti.;," �,,,#.�..0 ,.( '''''''es , •S + k o r ,t tr{"y't t-' r ,, �, y .•� f �M ! �` »,Fs��""•^�.z,49r. ? � •+ w� «tnd �C.4�t, � ,fin" � p'� t s �.,.t'�.�n �` �n!y pr t r � ! .� .., , a, ::s' vn.•a a�. pt^^ {�"'., u. .: ."rt�'� �' �. � t�? y t8 u.)t ? a f,1 r $�.<.+ ,(tA ... . .... ,�^e � ti .%$:� . .h� 4 ro.,, �. r•.,,�% .sk.S.t,.,a w.. ;P'a�.k;,t�,�+r t„.r.....V.+, ?.�: t ,e-.,.... `"lot l.Y .w .. ,. • . __,... o _ , _ , _ r POST CASON 1 OFFICE -- LEGEND __ METHODIST CHURCH 1 - — 137 N.W. 1ST _ . AVENUE a Q a CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS N.W. 3RD St N.E. 3RD ST. 137 N.W. 1ST AVENUE Li SUBJECT AREA - CITY 0 o— I- z ix ATTORNEY vi `" in- = o BUILDING _ I- ce — { M • — SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION MARTIN LUTHER KING JR_ DRIVE N.E. 2140 ST. 1 I I II I I - I IZI P 1Q I I 4 - r PCN#:12-43JI6-1B-01-059-0D12 II UMW a c� 3 APPROXIMATE ACREAGE:0.23 I ABRIDGED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TOWN OF DELRAY S 1-5 FT_ OF LOT 1&LOT 2/LESS S 3 - . FT/BLK 59(OLD SCHOOL - Z CITY a SQUARE HISTORIC DISTRICT) - HALL z J- ZONING:OSSHAD(OLD SCHOOL _a SQUARE HISTORIC ARTS DISTRICT) - N.W. 1ST ST_ W N.E. 1ST ST. FLUM:OMU(OTHER MIXED USE) 0 3 z > EXISTING LAND USAGE:SINGLE - Q ' FAMILY RESIDENCE 3 COMMUNITY LiLiI WITHIN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS z CENTER Z Z -; ZONE:#559 I• 1 WITHIN CENSUS TENNIS OLD . :I - TRACT:tf6T / SCHOOL 1 I 1111 STADIUM 1 SQUARE l i I r AVENUE E N U E PLANNING ATLANTIC X ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE SOUTH > Q I z a COMPLEX COUNTY COURT I- W� E 4S HOUSE Z '1 r > S `t _ LONG—RANGE DIVISION(� DIGITAL BASE—YAPPING A Q Z cc.n GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION N .— SYSTEM N.W. 1ST ST_ S.W. 1ST ST_ S.E. 1ST ST. MAP REFERENCE/: LM734 - -- OCTOBER 2003 -- Z 6 El . -iyll I I 1 „' S.W. 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND ST. UHRAY BUCH • DIIRAY t(ACH i11 i HISTORIC PRESERVATION I�� MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT P. 199J I I W l 1993 " 2UU1 Agent: Jude Endres Project Name: Endres Office Project Location: 137 NW 1st Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a Class II Site Plan Modification and landscape plan for 137 NW 1st Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/DEVELOPMENT-PROPOSAL The subject property is located on the east side of NW 1st Avenue, approximately 75' south of NW 2nd Street. Zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), the property consists of the south 1.5' of Lot 1 and Lot 2 less the south 3', Block 59, Town of Delray, and currently contains -an 824 sq. ft. contributing, single family dwelling constructed in 1921. The building is located on an interior lot on the east side of NW 1st Avenue and is currently situated between two offices. In April 2003, was administratively approved for the replacement of the front façade windows around the enclosed porch with fixed, single light windows. In November 2003, the Board approved a COA application and associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements, and demolition request for the conversion of the single family residence to an office building which included: a Conversion of a 824 sq. ft. one-story, contributing, single family home to office; o Demolition of an 867 sq. ft. one-story, contributing cottage/garage; ❑ Construction of a 1,526 sq. ft. addition on the contributing building; o Construction of a nine (9) space paver block parking lot including one handicapped accessible space; and, o Installation of paver block walkways, associated landscaping, and refuse container area. Meeting Date:February 2,2005 Agenda Item:III.D. 137 NW 1st Avenue-Class II Site I yModification and Landscape Plan Page 2 Since the November 2003 approval, the only work undertaken has been the demolition of the contributing cottage/garage. The development proposal is a modification of the landscape plan that consists of the removal of a c.80 year old mahogany tree from the southwest corner of the lot and the planting of two 20' high oak trees within the front yard. REQUIRED=FINDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(b), a Class II site plan modification is a modification to a site plan which requires no review of the Performance Standards found in LDR Section 3.1.1, but requires action by a Board. SITE PLAN MODIFICATION ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall be specifically addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development proposal. LDR Section 4.6.16 Landscape Regulations: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16 (D)(2), all existing native plant communities on sites proposed for development shall be preserved where possible through their incorporation into the required open space. Existing plant communities that are specified to remain shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible with trees, understory, and ground covers left intact and undisturbed, except for the eradication of prohibited plant species. The initial development proposal had included the tree within the landscape design; however, as final drawings were being prepared, it became apparent that the site survey depicted the tree in the wrong location. Also, the diameter of the trunk was not accurately depicted. Rather than being sited close to the southwest corner of the ._ proposed extension, it is directly in the path of the southwest extension wall. There are 3 solutions to this problem: 1) Relocate the tree to the location depicted on the approved development plans. 2) Remove the tree from the site. 3) Redesign the southwest corner of the approved extension to allow the tree to remain in its current location. The applicant has made inquiries about moving the tree to the location depicted on the approved development plans; however, although this is possible, there are a number of considerations with regard to this option. It would take 3 months to move the tree, which would hold up the development, and the cost would be in the region of$20,000. There is no guarantee that the tree would survive the move as it is in its maturity and, if it did, it would not have time to take root properly before the next hurricane season. 137 NW 1st Avenue-Class II< Plan Modification and Landscape Plan Page 3 Furthermore, the branches are brittle and susceptible to high winds and, even if the tree was transplanted to where it was identified on the plans, pruning would still be necessary which would deplete approximately another 20% of the canopy, which was reduced due to the hurricanes. If approval is given for the removal of the tree, the applicant has offered to plant two 20' high oak trees at the front of the garden. The City Horticulturist stated that the tree contributed to the setting and character of the area but that it would probably not survive being moved due to its size, character and age and as it is already stressed from the recent hurricanes. For these reasons, the recommendation was to either redesign the extension or remove the tree completely. Section 4.6.16 (D)(2) of the Land Development Regulations states that existing native plant communities on sites proposed for development shall be preserved `where possible'. In this case, it would appear that the preservation of the tree would only be possible if it was to remain in its current location which would require modification of the approved extension to the contributing building. In his efforts to add to the building appropriately, the applicant complied with all of the conditions set by the Board and, as a result, a contributing building will be repaired, altered and put to a suitable and sustainable adaptive re-use. While the removal of the tree will be a loss to the character of the property and the immediate area, positive findings can be made with respect to this application. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the Class II site plan modification and landscape plan for 137 NW 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations. C. Move denial of the Class II site plan modification and landscape plan for 137 NW 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not comply criteria set forth in Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations. :. ,RECOMMENDATION ' , Move approval of the Class II site plan modification and landscape plan for 137 NW 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations. Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments:Location map,approved site and landscape plans,proposed landscape plan and front elevation • IL- • of 2 elotk 59 01d _.._.._...- _.._.._..`..._.._.._.._.. � r School /lI g„•,,,,,Y..m PLANT LIST • REPIOVE 7 61LVER puT70NJ100D -_ --_"',-0 P., Rw".."' TI•2 an n•N,MO.r[u.Ic.noN e---_ ..____._ - ��w A.CRANT t.Ece ANC runs y_ ,,,}��� ,`- -._— � THORNBROUGH e� • �1\ tl, N CD J Leeeebbr alvwrlrelU rPIQ.a�P.wl _ •H _ -, _ --OCIATES .,[ I` 9k.SfoMw Irn.•'or.roll tenor, wey..ewe.e, F��_�w������c:.t.���.b �^ ANDASSBROUGH I �'' R"" ...XXe��� awe„rw fa rr. IQN CI Jkfr Ce„Oylpr..•wb•u \\� :\ w� IQ nQ��+_�/_/.// �� rMno '�i.7c�'4 D'M.•',geroll u.epy.1D�.PM, v , Ll 1 t I. Iv v,.....n.ll.... Pro ) M,O.r•r. elan e"pry �A1�!/%�`_v%/�i.!%///, 411.54121411f,1 u..osurc•r.o.rttt1 ' ^.1d. ,:::.. �....e..w.. Y M,rrn,a.wu •� a )No t•.b rturd) R • n a,wrw••.1.0.r•Mo..l.r Pawl G 1 V'" . �- e c ;1 • \..•e.m..... NIN.N'2w. .y ,-% ,I e� •,Y ...Cr I TRI LEOf: " �jEt eoDh�9B e r M.•••Fr.rou r•"•FY - 1 m..I.e..lr)>... / Ci ' : i)eu + IiY�FFij1)r� f.n„ " KEY Dlr PLAN,•ro erecmuna i 1 J ''1 ITigQfl 4! 4r,M . beeves p.gNDCOvt.o MD ACt,NT• 1 �) ; $ $ li r.�pY...w.wp A. .e. Meowingp0 •p,11.rPr a«.e., `\ / Alm a 4:�«� • re wee � r......r: I•n•w•rwlu IUu•n•n•r..e.1 \ 'air` r'l':P:l'\r+•o..w. •u n ..M.1O'•rr.roll �'.d'�I `•i,'' 1 w.....w.. 1.•.r.74•.p.r.u.1'.� ExleT,OAKS N,��J�''.1�i�� -.___-- _ 11 �1'"'� v liI •1 ' \ ,.•/ IRnmsw .•)n la ...lit ?hI.7f eX I '..I I 'I� / ® �• �' t •I, �� II I •)1 IIN ve^uarY mie ww.rrn.r f ) '• ..ova.. ip• : t?&7 II/. __ ExeToAxe � • '`eerol•ro.. y� %7• I MOM • ; t Em o... mr N DCNOTCe NATIvIr ORClle I',1 ' �I • !i)" 1 g Mrl• w w , EXIlt, I T ^o—1r �� ❑` �+ r r ,� T.r..e••• tira w..."�`wwe.[ COCOPL1Fl NEDGE riA 'd.�• '::ti �,1,, I^I \ 'I r ; N „...,..‘ 27.T.4.7.=Xr r s .....+. r.ws•w..to NOTES •'i a A. 1 eI LJ^,- eep0*5 *bblend•Refb.r. �r l fil i Seel to b St.n[ylw Tlarw',Robby b d.vna rF,.nny. 1 n 'd9:' / a.tlrd1M.up•br•0•Tw Ott ee+•.p•rrp rwa.11e a4NlYn open \ 1,4r I ',11 O wog 1pprawd rte..vu EXIDT, f'I GTNr1V lapaebo la M oaellOon.rd Irdn4R•p.eM Jll[r rlYab b W. \ wLEXANDlR \• � • �,J 2. Noon.• al R.a Flee ht.eV,rd Kee nest=wn be et/ootl Cebu.Doable.. PALr16 4 Y p wan n� fbr>,bpwll w r.lelu b be lPWYa rwal^A b.p.urlull.l.. t:}\\I i h A - GrECIFICATION9IGISCL lit f �•�4 i� RENS�S EJ , �r� wm..m outto/lerL1�•4epwe Crew.awuwwlor+N).r.lUnranrarny \ • ? ^��X 9/23/03 �[ Nwibdo Wwywh O.4w Ind d•dro•aE wnblbla•Gob Ra Wl1r. 6�L• EXIIT. out Wm.c ob.a..p.DlkJlbeelil Mt plrt..p.d ,.'/ re ®�� v r \GOGOPLIa"I NEDGC 3/23/03 nuNr LYTe p.nn n•,,rd buvo Of pl..•nlbenwwdry pen w�•^)n.. IQ 3/OS/04 r�r^N.m..L...tP,NeR.•e elaa�Ye wn u.. .d.etvr rYir:to b�Wdroi°Ir la� ilw wl'w waT.y ,' �*11\\ A� --- �1 ` ',Wit 1..G..enlr a I L.____. .'IS \\\r.•pa.bY fa MMAtkn or Mull 4••n1'Natl fa ino Debrefer wub 't 'glIAdep A %� \ oowulssloNJaagr lc w Nuelon a re Lrmup.walla r%100tlUI57]!'_.. 1�!'.��/i%//� 1Iww taros or LMu Nwl•ct r 7 r r.1.111V J: ,_., •�' AAe ore 1.lb•buea ore bo be at toe. F• prtrni i1...__ JiY•:�:Aj ; 4 ',1 I 03-012 ?LAy AMMMnaer16.11wlpr ern be er r.eowl>d '�� \.+ep. ti;�'I�`/ / pLM.0•r=- \\ 1 I /0000 edLITrp.qIwnba•r.•s ofale,end hoe abbYaalrrar _-'{i •� '•./I' .MI , I' / \\ '1 I �•TE u•.r.OffWar ..MOA11•OAbep itedsba6o•NNlmid.Y' fijl \�\\ ••�i /Ii��_ r/ /` ') i LANDSCAPE CALC9 me raw Of rot bit ROAM pellg.wl bpl•.tl noel elnl re of l'alR..n ,i� 60D •nle.•..no. / 7/14 03. e•ee .art. sated Mow by•'aeeteg.oa ,i1 ..'.;■�� \ '"01ire01OPton°�p• •� / A TOT AL LOTYq• RRILIpR Pon•N Tropk•IrnllvIC•1•c1 a rppOwe.qwl wnbrppntl rry pvnrg p rw.wrr.a i a u.1/ '. O. .T1GMQ1,NAxen.1•111• ,I,DIv�t1.[rc. •••• eprt. tIFrl.rl N 012+NAW enn lwc..m pP^+ r511 -- , �to .`o Q' • �,,. G. rou•RR•nwe LOT.Rt• c.r••e, )Me wn. w Q4cvlace..•an W7 of e°Wood fob bowed /mere ribst al. w All I'+ �_ G Z R...."P.'•Ye, '"' eG rt. b6 2.010 Ia Irdfa r7rN eerd b br0'/'Ww•eereloe slowed ( DOD`` Q, L U G e. ARE or rein*A o o.owo eo+[ DO. M rt. plod --- ,✓� E CC U • P rein*••D O.OYbCO•[e1 P•W.•ID[D r.rD..., 1 w n. e^b b IMilrpu w pwd i•n J'00,10..116)a P.ce•wcl��"wvy� r + • �-\- 'D IIII O a • r OMI v[e[1•fpNRteNtOI r A • ,,. O CC Q p N•tIN Uteft•TIOw PRO.'U!D e.• •p h. OM N W I lw N V WA Iy wRl.r}wll b tl 1•r roe bob..o A.Ml b _" . . V.NWr1oeh Nell MAIbw to W�pl•rfel 0.4y n tad llNG. N[144 ' •r��l ., R�16 J N. roTK nvro.rtNlat•R Lt.•a. toes Gall, .AN ce.p•�bwdrg bll rM bdAll ellr plaug tol • •. „ _ t TOTAL M°.WII Laaa-A'l 1r!•ga11R[D I.INx)e, 'a .d rt' WIEIOr.Al ptee serial re N.A..,m ver.siy et.woutkn.0 N b lwrn ra r'r poW'u SMECT DID moot Wa b scold one: w MR Ford ref roes.b a.to �--�_- J. • lOTAL NT[NDR VArn Tee•Plee le•O D 3 Na•• Mop C05l PSI vau Rol r or re luld.up*0RUNumC I cw eolI notify Orr O. �-- IC TOTAL IR[InOR N••D[TR[•RO,IIYD K•N,be.)J ) TQl1 of al/NVYg r•¢RwRer IM Ya.IIT I- TOTAL NTt0O.•..•.et mop.PRO.nD[D ) Tent �ellvr e'aur+wub fried u..ebpwla rr Y°brgpai�.s wlrolr lb SGALEI I/H' • I'0'• DR•® K TOTAL WWI l�1T I.�pa 004 r•mrMd OR U1 V. .III Iley INIIgqra•d W wallLymow pond fYvos ! y r•4w ti 1w ER APl Nr uwdbaf. WIrq wRG•CorlwepualerwGnv.da I Ill n.d u0 ll ?MN.Mee[0..tx R•.rRT[R TrV[.rmdulaD '^I ae, • T+aee w I.^e•O•F•wO.YZL tow..Obese thin.11ll b r..pa•bY IN III 4••1 rod prM rrNMt O. TOTAL MORER r e RW TO a eAv Prvr,,c[D 1 To>•t. •wlgr of I T Yrdeb,groat e.B e eell f poloa r P. T01K MPIMA 01Rete t0it.•NDPIlt! 1 {Tomasgm ell00 Wab drw,A.Aeaglets Sore roeed IE RNa ba road Beau of Nbb gods, -}� . ,a nu[I deuw,anl,aNrp.44pwea•ar.lau.WabfNanrNYolsb.p.roowfl Jr�' l?�W 4�' p TOTAL We[RONO1l tq[.pgll.iD O•rR.N l.d Wab NVtlb tolob Ol.1'IN Yykg.41 MN.bb•a�1•d wllbrWd aOa.I^d Q 1D1AL Nfp[.C.M.tly[TR[[.rneO/IDtD [• Ia Odle Ire v FMer b 1eYlYlkn !. TOTAL IWe[ROTRlI Rr Rlrr P.OVID[D a nul. WLWIR11 All pW NVYY wlbgg�Y.*r35 is lyrr Ifu'�°'pl Of raOl.=L �..— _.—_ ^.• Q//\\ . Paw wbbra.rre.w lPlyw.GwRw rppll.bMln�p.•^I�•'d NI,FgYc.rr C NW 1ST AVENUE II/f// \\ Oe.lrabtnliObJtaLreb. -.�.w. .�� - .... v15.'.. A'PMleoVet) L,4/.1ZgeAPZ R_Icvni Print: _ I _ _ — _ot 2 Block a..r...rQ.rYn _ • �e.w'".' PLANT LIST - ..—..—..—..— _—_—_—_— • ® S9 are Ow R.�mN.At school RV on PLANT AlM SPCCp1uTCr 15' ALLEY square D}:'°x't: , TREES AND PANS p-. ._— _� —'—_ _�p • • �t�ua ,` •y ` N CD I C ceaeoo,ehm0ro6e(Piston Plum) -—— ' —— — - A. GRANT • u'NI.,6•aura,all aenwr .N� —�e_oonsPL ` 6NE—- THORNBROUGH :110 Rermaw N CC ] Caseated a,"Fetus(Snwr Butlen.oaa) .._.. 1�jt— 6 I4,4'4..4 12.ht„6'apr„lull CCPOPY.B'PA. / -�\`' ` ,' \......\\\\\\\\\\\C\\`,;Q\\\Q\ uu..5 RY . +.1'1 u , . :\�.�\���\������\����� . ,A AND ASSOCIATES e�rR` PR2 J 5'ht.; m.e•I.nll(pggmy Dpls palm),{ (��j�% /1'ia<��% is•nL:aR,aael. k �%/%i11�:.-%1%//ice. 1 /1�� �'1 w� - err ow�•�c Pc 6 Plpn aDNma Own.(sonronr Palm) G'R • i "1/ 1/1 •t0n0N0 ARE 1TA0NC PETAL•101'CAL AMORo. 1,-I!'.a.nla.,R e'Y Y.1 \Il I\ IAl I' SIGHT / '� [•NMO 0.4 AAGHII[en N 0u 2 0um.ue dglnlan•((u OK) I' \TR1An OLE m TRIANGLE '1 S [P •tx-v ht.,a wry.ari• 500 I \ o •el'G" %NW // I I AHo we n•HHus iiiih.•li N OV 2 Oureps•4pinlAna(llrt canopy ( ( 041 a Ili 30'n6,10'wr„hill Canopy.•D•clm.n '1 :�(/y/y ■ y[x' •'Aw °y r' -Yf��\ -A�\ I tiV. / it / I ,Ip,.In s.ulsn.,«u. „Seel! el�E rem n raw m. } PEP Ott PLANT AND SP[tr¢ATdI ' , • [•71 \ // ,'A DV)ne-avc 1dYEl1Q°1 ��\�"� SHRUBS,0RQUNSC0NTRS AND ACCENTS y r• 11 ® .J '� -/�6�Eya� ar).rt-an+ 1iT ipi/B[[sda-d 11 �i_\n"r r ANN •0 11.00p Annuals(Pa S•*Non) ID % 0 1�+�[11E]yta 0°'•�/:. e'pat.12'.pr.,No 12'ee {{ an ft `t YYYY Sp r lL/,•Pert"'." ALL 12 ARam as.(*Nell,(Dunn Apeman..) , 4.1,,,„1„,,,,, SO. A rrr m.a w . S wao-t.. IS'R1.,20••pry.o( .' C 8 M.e..o.a..A,. N tNR is enrnolelanu.,coed(eeeaotum) `RLS.I•m A•e PAT,at•B• ••em..Is,2'e.a. - ` / '-'r•on COD 36 Ceeic1. auml Harlow.,(Crolen) C%IST.OAKS V ' _-._ _. a 30'nl„x0'.Dr.I°II,wrblY Du L.A. f/ ..._ -. ' COP 2 Cadet larmkalle(Na.allan 11 Plans I,�lr'�- `'� �I e/ll. (--J ggi J-•'ht.,lull.mlwea.wrlell*N pot L.A. � ` ��� I f W+J t•'•` ertl a omm a 1a11arm(OH,.ur) �:" ,'!I. 'O�o OQ'O'O CAR 7 crdenla°uquila Mleml Supremo'(Core.nio) / ` 06 �'+® ® ......._-.-. _.1 ° 4 SS N.N umn r.w N M'ail..J'rDr„lull a • 8 owA HAM 10 Ie patens(rroll,P� (, nl / iJ `nl1 D! . - -. .I,1i 'e'P 20'n1.,20'.Dr.,tuna 2 , I r j1 . .. r r.s ION 33 1'S watt.,.Slur.• D.P.I°(,t.) 11 ✓♦ r�\/ / �e , i 1 r• I -- a d rr • nl.,`I'opt.,hilt,I� / 71 W.AJ N••"c al•. N LAN JS 10/.1.e .(Pena.lent ) \ j' '�� Re_1l r/ IFIfor \ O r,G... 4PR@eb2t1 Ny p .'I',. ` - . /CC f SIN-*, 6'ot.,'0'•Dr.,lea .,INI I �Jy /wet• ..i'�� % .\ ' !Z �r^' N NEP IB. N...rapt,*Nate Sawa Ism) -`%i� ►�. '�'���.�'1LBi1 gin(^ ,Ip%/.;r.••�i�� Err . uPm tear.,3� c. {•// !/ Ji/u. :Yip �4ia/,AiL:i,.1/�. f>XIST NB 55 umMDumum) ,I Yi+\ V 10r/�Q✓t ' OAKS •l.,]0 DCNOTCS NATIVE SC(S • gig i. i�i ,aEt1 •.0! n.In......o*Nate EDGE' A E ik r... P-/'�. ®I 1ii N) i t_Amu ins•wran 'f{���p �u; ��' f� N fE*�...r,., Kona cw,..s.Rsmw,� NOTES ~• t`['N is l`` l'-mil/ "�� Al pal malrk m eI flat..p a I.ur, I.�' :'�AI "Og ',ill .� 1 O l A Sea la be 61.Auquafne'Root.;ea/eel"la 6.Hrmht aallly. 'yt 1 ' / �® Cif 4 e W y[ Al won ad wises,.to Ia.M I0A emrege Iran atanelt nipall0 saHm f 'I.' I p -, Ylhq appall rala mono d,o if O Q y toot oela rupnsNe ler a aan611n,od Iad,0W..p.alleal'ens.,lane.la NI EXIST, 1 1 tl7 CL • u o a. plat WI.Ran ad Ipldf oleo.Mel W eau1a.10 Cahoot Daam.^N, ALEXANDER `' 1' �� •�j ., YAM,lepwl,ad I"ISN.to be apple Kmonq l0,MIIIXalionr. PALMS , (�( 75 ) •_ SPECIFICATIONS � 'IyL• I i NONEI.GANA[:ad pal malrk us.Ma/e VP to name ens 14111 falarmlly I Ire,i / ® liir 'A ..a Ills Ill Mke Mner«1 Gees,and Sladan,ad Sod'De 0004,Gw.It D a.NP. r "CV m ,� REVISIONS Plant,NI[A do nal mot Ipetlfralknl 0101.aI I t {7�p 2y • C'1 PLANT UM Ovnlllle,atn,and bce1M al loll rill De delermP.d D tail Psis. /^ f,NR1.0 OCTAL• u.un SAt.a OH of pal.non Id1 rwal a..conks., I Tana aonel�plan del"mT,I I •:'1 /'' f EXISTING 9/23/03 p Saochq a 9 ) G s /�v�sXv� Wilk ie HEDGE 3 23 04 imal ills Oaal6N.rem Sop 1 Ws Fr to Se vsa one o?APO.ens Cobalt OR be ) / / , a,N.I wifcal'ko al aloe Nati.,glad la a Pala Narrparlyln Boom DI ' �;f Di p N (,N•) '� 5/OS/04 Pogo,la the.umlkl 0 la Lmascoat ka.wl. 'I `Gif I ;p,• cap �! _ - - a / / S'RSIN110NS:No.e a1IRlbns Mal 1.wewlad.Wool oats.a Lands..keIO.t1. 1 E y' i, ..r•J dL '1)//i%/� :f 1 1 B OS Any Mode ne Illuliml Md 6e tilde a Ns PS I Jfyy,, •�- /'--' 1� COMuiSSION ptA41MC Sal.lo0ppe0 Md 11 aeon,oleic ad Ie of Md.m Itnr lonlgn mal"id. -•tSil/ — — — �j��/•igG•'nw��rt: %�,� t�i • LANDSCAPE CALLS Nos ad come Noll Pe pqale min a min.al 0'loped(5D;merle 503 sand) d.1 I �•� , Irr�I�►IdA�r'��Af'� '•` \ 1 03-012 a allan awe roe!Ipl Aal.a allNpt N611.pale T Des nIn a aim of/ofIpM `',I -da4 I {;•/•-\\\\' \`\\\\\ [,f GATE A rota Lot AMA CM SO.rt. Resod Pk Mt tap 6 N.1114 WI. 1'a /, I I FUTUNA.Pam And iropkd I.1611.(12-I-12)a wp.*spool the It apple all"thorns / P. SAVC1lmC1,PA.RIND.rAIN.AYS,DRIVES,CiC. 6,3J0 S0.fI, ad pk 10 mulNYq pr meaIKIVTRI teamnae WPII(elim 1014 Y'Jf •.•, r I 7/)4/03 C. foul rpMOui lot ARE. e•(A•B) .Leal so.rT. NJIOI Al lien Net/t mdMe/nln f'el ppprend Worked WO h o J fool to,<nat.A.axvee I'll _ '• r r. ad paaiaNx er.Y Met Ir mu11Ae On f Of,gplNtO Mkde Rind,N be/mean a pan or n Gif "REMOVE LLJ • O. 0/Ls a funnel ANo URMD<oKR.EpPRED D•(C..50) ,,Poo R0.rT. Stn J•Ion fa Dean. KW maw Dt Gee'A untie oNlnle appmd, �'al �j., EXISTING a / t MC•V IHRueS AHD GOJNOCOK.3 P 0100(0 1".„. :D.wet. RA46NC PBOCIDORD.N pall.Ad le pale al to kis,.t win Ivry era pesoly lion, (,,fl , -•'k'I MAW/CANT- '`.5 Q .. F. NATK KCxLnW R0OUR[D h/D..2, 0T6 so.rl. 9r0D as Asap malvll Md S.pale 0 ails 1 my Ism•do a eMr°e.lrvdm.Kelrk Y'1 SOD SOD 1'1 C) u C7 ` O. NAPA KCCTATM PROWL° IA. S0.IT. Oh 2 mature PDI pulr Ina ay erepass Ma be paled may Ion Parnmgl w a Rol to G', .' E et 0-J P. rotAL PAVED VENCLILAR usE AREA 5.0te So.,, Rpee In.neve eon MIL 54d Pam al la le 001Hd Archrr f end.II nw0101 aPhoie 'al p a INN*ay epmpaT.a luknq Subpad•la addlurbd,d ad ladlll eh posting sd. C I. TOTAL HTERIO.LANOSWC ARu PEOU.ED 1•01 X AD) 34 30.0, E ti Z 0.. iota'INIIRIOR Lk.DSWL AMA PRONDtD J.e/S SQ,n. RAIE6NC:Al pal malrW OP 11 valve h.NorwpN1•Itr Fnpl ally our one to remora el ti pedae. ... __ - ` .0 n'-e'ewatrt wenNe - ', „ O 665 molar,.Mal I,rale.r"y goy k r a mkMum ono e«1 ae Iod ad Nrwllr w pI to - SHEET 4 J , TOTAL INTERIOR SHADE TREES RCWIR[D A•(i/125 PP) a TREES lug amlivdt mail all Ton e.t.a. 1 No/whoop.hsla,1atan,Unlrala RIM nobly oar • 75.00'(P) MI • L. TOTAL INT[ma SHAD(r.ECI r.ONOED J TREES • a other Altllu•14 epmtmmlo ellr hlldaM ,• \ / u. fobs lM[AR FEET VJ000 HDMO PORNO OR In 1'. • OPOlt l toll I'a Iola a d It FM a state to vvradd,"ndN apart Nal Ilse meted VEwCitAR u5C AREA eD atq okapi ad Inn Nuolpi 1M Baal.prod.If1Nods vs./01 be all Vol no hIty L-1 H. rink'swats or r[RIu[TER 1RCO R[P1M[D N•(u/50) • 1RC[3 d la pan.Opal awl 0e Gem al IN aka of N.Contractor elm 1v"lr1air rape..,,by: SCALE: )/8" q•�„ Uo,.chops,Wo.l Awns,talroela Rol ell II rospoubl,la a Om ad pdma trnalnnq DRA/01 BP o. TOTAL Nuue(R Cr P(RIut TER TREES PRDNDED TREES 550 S1 ad ass Washout N.Massa q,ka. • gH/aJ P, 101AL NVNRER or Tyros To BE SAVED CA SITE I MCI 5W Sad mwt 1,Inn,pan,and ett tale,End Ill 0 daffy welds,a)NllaaN panel, O. TOTAL N'ose0R 0,NAnK TOM REOM'RCO a(A.N),.50 • IBM dnaw a nook.rand.A(art'1.6-6-6 WREN and DI oat.o1 a Pal,of S Os.per 1000 id IL Soo era be nitre to a a,Io of 1 a6r Win.AA one.l0 II waded Mal/l rdld rook end O��\ •„ R. TOTAL NUMPRONGED NUMBER 0r HATAHATK TRCIS 6 TREES el dart ranaNd air to holdana. e TOTA1 NUN0ER V1R[If ON PLAN P,CM000 I TRIES OIRRANIEE At plat mairkl Nd nn M Da ppalald I pa ono eanp,lian al papal. • Fa as lob.pooled la I yea.dvana cps.Io nteu,Poona,and I0..Prolamin(eel•61e anal by Codrala, MU 1 CT AL9FMT TV .7 .' II • r O9OSC 3 L Z%esq-PC P-fivJ e -'- Lot 2 Otock: e'. / PLANT LIST -.._.._.._ _. .-.._.._ ; 5 h ace 017 PiA1fl AND Snc0(1 1101 I 51 /11,I 11' • lA Square mrC3 AND rues p .. O I J 1<Y, - •--- • A. GRANT • ! ", saes rwr; 5 N Co Accts.,.d+e•alnrn %501'PJ _ -.... r • l l.n'. wh ea ny t • �, • ( �p n n - 1I SSOROI f It D'i r.. ... v., n ,U en, rr Ad'< S WI`\�1�.�\\\'„i. }r�'uoxnc�£�i c� AND 9SSOCL111 •. Pn2 J r. I nl(pro ny n,tr r m) L //I�, raid'✓ )li A `i FrA1':rtl�iy �'•. ..� J,r a r'1 6 rl n. e l e Paws) A't BIRO. I,I \I `� I 'Sir n / c r - ..n b.,n.. .net•m,e a 1 \ Y\ /1'` I/u' JtiLL d.I es �- 3 u,• 7 l p (1 ( ) r4 w r•01.E J N. ..c< �fh•7S 1 o✓ 7 r ran 1r onu/ r �,.© IQ�/ r 61. d e. q 10'In n •Penn•„ ti. - `k^'r/ tier 1\ ( �/f •..„ p�iyq Yf •• Ali....,""' ACT 0(2 PI 1 of \\� \ I I Al [p[7y ,iA,l o• `•" l.d) .ar VI.0 Ce1;Yn ( ti• \ey/1 i`\ I / �LI- I I �w��3ti'y it 1 Y•n. a 'n i:9.7�t oS, .n -�n S Pu03,cn0N10CUKR5 AND ACCCe - l tL ��`s.,,, L IJ II �I1 P ier 'sil „ , nr r�I. \, n err, -Pet YAm., 17 �6„-9'y .�. J _- Frr51 4 i[9', l:,1, Ilan.art nu 2 A n1 ,I(Non n 04,n n:J � n.✓•`. v / !h J1 4i 1V As.,nn'�t 7'} ✓E/ u• °", el Aid: 25 ? r D M (Cc ) / tP n i i)1,/e/"' i / 7 1 r,.r :An n•,s at_s_. .,'... NW 2e [a v ([ I ) C%li1,OANg (bfl �iAJI l _._ .. / /. / '-' etAe 2 to N.,JO n ( 1 fe,r null \ >AI II, -• t l/�- /. 9•i t It.: � i. .:.. //,, 3 err A \ • tiV s 9 a I) /7.V .� J1)w ()(��V Cli 5 C u (C Y) \ �l I,ar,A �t�s \ ( 1 A.I = F (� 1 CAN x e v t r,e,rn'hoes Ir of (/' .�, .'>_ IA ! I»i F ,.a.,,. es &Aa l0110,0103pold,(r•ebss,) (:'/j.. s ^ //fR - `,f�J \ '1 j' e :_ / .. 70-ne1T 7w'DP..lots 2 I' 8 {, u nr,w • 1{(Y.A"f3.L1' I�met ruff.," I 1 1 n 6 .. '% , Fry,(I,j 01 \e. N +' / ma AP /,.,,n,e ear, a w,mcvn 1 CAI 0 n 19 1 (L:�L� lr. 4,D✓t'AX. R / tt__ O.y 7� _... . er .[P Inn u•a11 eie• e. (S ) f 1PP•r ,f/to '-� ✓A� ve A ,ng 51 ,DIONm ,e, x (5 e,0,rn,m) bI �� 'w�'`; Li! t [� ��•/ taw Cn51.OAH5 •0 /r e n rAn.,N a"f / A' I. Darot[2NnlVcrrct(S • 1 '' I�A� •� .� - rG1 Pyr ( (fix kt I a .> emR ICOC '1 , �.!1_Z� Ird��1i�I_.,� E�.;r,. r!'` •y 1 pk b N b:C.O. / IC N I AD YINI malnlal In Pe On de/I Or belles (/ / Wry ,•' ns `]\ I '( • i I' C F m y, Sod to et SI Auquelne Ilerelam,miracles 10 delays.q I ly fI 't' Q \ff�-\0' , 501 10_ (_2^s All IN mJ lanberot 10 I.tt.^100%(>ra0q 4 I 1. I leben 00 I 11 �() .'^, �0R ( C7 n I. X�� alboi rml Iraed 4on Ie.AIe la eel taneIm,1,end le M r D Si I n1 alleel en le II 1 E I I. ((� • P6.) r M S 1I OM I Plan d oebesmnf Nee be< P JC h00l AI E.AhlorR 1♦r J ( I`r m�....n v,n•n UAs,IapseL and Inrll'rn la 6e a0(ee ema,dnq I.fD«role PALM, \ 1 53 ''1" ,�) A ^ (( 1,1 „m,mN •,`r"' 112011DAPP(ne IAunl mama)at•d Na be bun In tome and r emlonity 7� 1 [�i /////`\A_ (1�\\ • "1?: RrNe an J (Jy�1 _ma..v•.., 11 n rWd N 11n i1[nnn me Aannab.cod Nd b,rY•rd,nrndePor eh 4 //%t';�-• `D (�J�„) nm h e rot ei mAircalnn,AP net be acmle, ♦� )n {,: /j l_l [ \ •. --- rtCn:,e�y(uJ.ur r,v.rr.�_. Ault LOIS: a [S use AM)Naha el bola),rt be del eJ of D d p1 I 6.1. /Y IF i L As.loed a qbrklIS r 'men an [n,a<Ie ee used e3 lbJ J. \ ,'/16/07 b,augAi I II 11 Ian el IAe landscape N:A L•q. 11 rp_ • sw111001I011 N absl lulb+,else,be e¢tpled wlnoJ<m,r nl lm0,tvpl Nt+erl, ,,, I I{ ( { ` CV '{•a I1 P 1 -r• ) CUJI:a 0. Any MI d S o111 ton,el d be Moiled an(se bd. 11 .,p o. �••haA `'n // a__ _- JI F .. . AMONG RaI 1 a NA be peen,qdn am nee Ode.a Wes Ivegn moterw y (\ x wy 'WI? y+�/ •°�� t \ i, 03 017 1.Ar1DSCNO,F CALOS hoes NO Ddm,the be fr,s.ra•Ib a me or A'IOW Mb much,50z eAnA)rn tau l j \\\�M3`s\ \/ e 0 ,• ,, �\\, o and bourn al I101 bell.named(Olin&Nall be ponied M beds r el I.oil Iwn� Y ) `', e.6`� ��w. ,,./1 fib' n \ ��' 't.':1( •• .aid 010 Ibe Ine6 el onlaq so, l 1w` 1+iw n, • *,1,;(% 10�/ 4 d. • •tout 1O1 An[n r 9r• 90.r1. r(ebl7(n Pea ma hoped loam(12-t..12),apposed tool h e to n2DlrA ells ranlnq ''/•r"( "ti', ,` a� I r! 9 v r" 7/14/03`""`• P s1alCNne3 wAxv ..On•J(n ru: C M' 30.rl. and pier In mktmq per mawlaelurm Ietemmended oPekelan,nl<e. {y1/• c .Ar 1 '6SHa_ 1 ,' 1 C. OVA PCWOVS,Ot APIA C•IA..91 J.AIA SO. 11y\GI'.Al Ion enal be 0 drnee se In J'01 reOp osed,I rdded ma cn a u J loot II.Pr a eta shrubs i , r a.• e0� n. !A or.P 3nS nm fn01r IO COveA nta•r[o 0•(f.•.301 .mo c0.re. anA ryanawrer arm tl M 4e m,lcned dIA] I AppinvtJ dNtdded and<I a bed:NCrntOn plan ern {' h `14/y n t'l • , l REMOVE v LJ Deb J.es la Magi. Vden,naAJ 41 GuJe'n untie„emn.N appeeeed. `>• L'/" Ne \ "���'Alnoso cY- 1'O O 2" e ',Nee a.$,NNt9 A.0 CPOP,O:04tnS OnoN1[0 ,30n !O . rIAryVIIC MOW:N/nit rhos be&Wed a1 son levels al•Ara Ivey vote pe•an,yNaee, C ^� IS�Ir �e :Sf't J t: `C . I. A 9./M«1nuT1 n[ou 120 r•01•.'3) x» 3D.,A,' SSA end WO n a1a1a Net D00061.10 me 2'a•y ham nab es alter mllesclo,. rid r, .. q'. 'J 1 �SOR 500. .SC �\. ^{ • `y N Ill.a. NAbvI Keerell a M0noe0 m• SO rl In a rob.S.grtele,Inert my liOnq,Yid be Vented enry I em e700 11 a so at AN l0 4 J .. YY t. A 5,..,1 _ E CC 1 rr tot,PAs{0 v(rlCucna V•{AnC• J3l0 3O,I. loped:the na1Na qenlh not'Sn)d PAP&ma Io be Mo IN d,eS M lad.II nI< t / C\ �.- Dlewgn ier tanpaelta buidnq lolls.10 una,lulbed AP,end bm3lya Os planlnq l. e' f ^'A e q _ , In I•,a tar•0r 1AN09.A•1 Aran 0[Cun0O ,.II 10) )n0 90.II. 0Al(C0nC AA plant male,bl OW be el(6 In Ila,wghly alter Anfl1llnld so as le r d 1 J, '''• 0 a r fp,meat OA but.:Arc Ar[A onO00C0 a 3.669 5•1 I I 0M ennlnld that be valved any dos ler a mlwmum oil..1 period me Ihaenrl^ s l , . �•+_._ .i•# ,�w.�.r.�-a ..m-- -.---,' -.A' V••C J • K. In1A •IC 1,M b 0AOt 1e1L9 n(0lnn(D r•l/,IS 6f1 3 10CCO lee,tnnlnuoty moist,ales CAN xcepl0ntt el In•Mnb:gm 0sla^atun.C.1(cIm,ea no11y Owl' 75 00'(P) I t •-' i 14 8111(2M frhnDC'ASPS 011010 U ) 00613 al diner rptane S bonsoll alio n11.1100 \_ \ I„✓ •:r I lrl__ S. O .9,!..,All Ire.,6 I9 Pee.), 114 be eared a,1oord le penile ands a10.1 a,d,ISO V,e,mama) `(S�J' r •- N. 101A1 LOVA rat SunnOu0opc PAtanle on ,37 i.e. rb sley 00061 end hoe Pee.),Ine gaaNlee period.IlelboJs used•in be furl,lain no nosy P. L.-1 It1eCN1Aa OOP MCA caused le punts,Come IAa be Ome al the 031•0 el Ilse Cmlr40 I(dose its/skull/n0oeslea by SC ALL: 1/8" ^ 1 J" p0Af1a1 0r N tout Nm,9(n a-P[m,e[11JI in(U n2Mrrre es•M/JOI • Nett, Ine Lnndse .Ardileel o*l PAPP,COnbaelei MW 112 be te,DmtA1c les as Nee ON 01.ee,nnaaq --- 0. 101At NUNOCA 01 0Cn19C ICR rode,3ve'AD[0 • 1nC[S 100, I and lose INmenaul bin es...paad Seee/N! r, rout.Pu0D:n Or er SCS 10 6[SAN:O Or v1r. I mats SOO Sad then 1e dmfe.rem,and rel reeled.NJ Vie el drbei,,need;,OD%ellonade&mot - ......___ _-......,, . -- ....-. 0 toe,1N1.10:11 CI Who(161,23 IICWrn(0 o•In•,I).'.a n laC[S Peer.,d Missies,Nseclt.A cemp1ele 6.6.6 lerliirer Nd,be 1Nt61 al a role el 5150.per 1000 1.1 II. Y _ sOtnL M)u0in N NnllvC,bets!Pa0N0CD a toffs Sod 041 be retard l0 a de.•I 1'Ole Wiese.N den le be spaded NOe be coked lamp,0,1 / -t n, 01 dtdl,'Mooed par le nl(of 4,n. / A" s IO1A1 Haa9Cn Or IRC(S Pe eaAN eA0NDC0 a )net'! CoAOMII(:All plod Doc l Nd1 be quaranlue Id I eta eller 0Olnplelion nI boniest. ///' PaleN!se le be qunmteal Is I year C r.&arMlee la Neill,,poahla,,bond site.Pepnsesee& +!�"" I 59 Old 1 Mt t Sch 1 ool . ' Square 1 ! 1 A. UAW' „,.. . 1H010110,01,GH g' ' ,e. . AND ASSOCIATES • !i.13ii;F:Mt!I • I . ••Z 1 a 8 5 j FiJ.:t'j g 4 . I 2 P•,,,,,i1 1 g 1 • ..: ,,, inlc;I.Yc.,?.,'< i,'', ' igriTT w •, • ".CS.'.9"...pi,.:',...;&'",,...';; -•• „!).,1,,•,',7;;; ,./. 4'-',..' * E). ;4; 1 :Ja.‘•-,,,,:. ....'ots ;LI ":1.?.) ', .Iii .'''%:;,74ki.)4.," .:ii'' ,.,"i'l'&'.0,- , i 1'-li I CYISINC.'..1,',:•,.iC,1 C4,.v6'4;1r 51'ti0,4l.,;.,;e;4:,‘1F o•..,.1,...'cY'a`V;,)..1,4 l;'i",),,T.,.i,4't"',,.,.1,•,,i k/' ,,..d,- ',,W,,,.1,1^,,.-,4>4.,1:rt;t0riA,.l r;1"=i—Atl•7•4,,•'t.-7‘.b..mei.1t•.rl.i•..,,,-,:,'..'"'.,n,.I,I,M1,_,,"v,,,P';4,4.4IA7.-,:..,4.'1.3'',,'1`,-',,i...".,'..r-1-.-1—.-=....i t_—i7--'-...i1r 1 1—".--'_---..'2'111l1111-j1I1Ueu li1II1kR1u1111II1I1ImiI1I1H11n1Mu1l1lO1n15::I:1ig::f7;IcL, A, e'iit6N " 4 lRt ; 03-012 1 *r:r1r5° " r411,‘,.) '...::......_.. -.' i FROI,T ELEVATIOI\I • .12,-.E,., • ',73 ?'''....:1 i' . ,:,•,,\ 1 t U41tAY DUCH ULLNAI'DUCH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARDd MP, MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT 'IIII 1993 2UUI Agent: Roger Cope Property Owner: Sandra Hoesley Project Location: 515 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District HPB Meeting Date: February 15, 2006 COA: 2006-130 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a partial demolition and subsequent alterations and additions to the main dwelling and revisions to the approved garage, at 515 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lots 11 & 12, Block 4, Del-Ida Park, and is located on the southeast corner of Lake Court and North Swinton Avenue. The zoning for the property is R-1- AA (Single Family Residential). The property contains a two-story, single family residence and accessory shed. The Mediterranean Revival residence, built in 1925, is of wood frame construction clad in stucco and is a contributing structure in the Del-Ida Park Historic District inventory. The structure was originally located at 324 NE 2nd Avenue and moved to its present location in July 1961 to make way for a Post Office. At its January 4, 2006 meeting, the HPB reviewed an application pertaining to alterations and additions to the existing historic residence, demolition of an existing shed, construction of a detached garage/guest cottage, installation of a swimming pool, fence, and associated landscape plan. The Board approved the application with conditions. However, the applicant has since revised the plans which require further Board review. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The application consists of the demolition of the existing rear addition, subsequent construction of a larger rear addition, and revisions to the approved garage/guest house. The existing rear addition, according Building Department records, was constructed in December 1961, a few months after the main structure was relocated to its present location. The existing measurements of the rear addition are approximately nine feet (9') on the south by nine feet six inches (9'6") on the east with a sloped roof ranging from ten feet six inches (10'6") to twelve feet six inches (12'6") in height. The previous submittal approved by the Board on January 4, 2006 slightly enlarged the rear addition to ten feet (10') by seventeen feet (17'), with an overall height increase of three inches (3"). The applicant now proposes to completely demolish the existing addition and introduce a significantly larger flat roofed addition to the rear. This new addition is proposed at a length of twenty-two feet (22') on the south and seventeen J N..w Avcouc COA 2CSS-?'35 feet (17') on the east. The height measures approximately fourteen feet (14'), with a portion of the wall measuring up to only ten and a half feet (10'6") and topped off with a three and a half foot (3'6") rail. Half-circle shaped cast stone steps lead up the door located on the rear addition. The original submittal of the garage/guest house included a door on the east (rear) elevation. Part of the condition of approval was to include a barrel tile overhang above the door. The submitted revisions have omitted this door leaving the elevation to consist of two separate sets of French doors and their associated wrought iron balconies located on the second story. ANALYSIS DESIGN ELEMENTS LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(6), and (E)(8) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features and new construction. The applicable standards are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(6) Demolition of historic sites, archaeological sites, or buildings, structures, improvements and appurtenances within historic districts will be regulated by the Historic Preservation Board in the manner described in Subsection (F). (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of height, front fagade proportion, proportion of openings (windows and doors), rhythm of solids to voids on front facades, rhythm of buildings on streets, rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections, relationship of materials, texture and color, roof shapes, walls of continuity, scale of building, directional expression of front elevation. The following criterion has not been met: (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. The addition, as proposed, does not contain visually compatible proportions of windows and doors in relation to the amount of wall space. The three (3) sets of French doors are excessive and the easternmost portion contains a blank wall, with the exception of the square window which is the only element to be found on the proposed north elevation. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The proposed rear addition should be revised to better fit the existing structure. The additional length placed to the rear gives a "tail-like" appearance. When proposing an addition, the additions should be decreased in size or stepped down in length from the main massing and its length. The proposed 5'5 N Swir,on A.er;e COA 2OO5-$5 length (22') is approximately fifty-six percent (56%) of the overall length (39'6") of the entire original structure on the south elevation. A decrease of approximately four to eight feet (4'-8') in length would give a more compatible appearance between the length proportions of the historic structure and its new addition. Furthermore, the size of the addition in relation to its window and door openings and the existing proportion of openings on the extant historic structure and others in the area, does not appear to be visually compatible. Lastly, the proposed revisions to the Garage/Guest Cottage give the elevation a top-heavy appearance, with the location of two (2) balconettes on the second story, while the first-story contains no features. The following is suggested by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines regarding alterations, additions, and new construction: •Do not introduce a new architectural style, or too closely mimic the style of the existing building. •All new construction should compliment the historic architecture of the district. New construction should not create a false sense of historical development by utilizing conjectural features of stylistic elements taken from other buildings. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: • The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. •Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. •New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. •New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. The above noted Guidelines and Standards appear to have been taken into consideration when developing the design for the addition. Elements from the existing sun porch were borrowed which unifies the new construction with the historic structure. It does not appear that the historic structure would be compromised should the addition be removed in the future. However, differentiation between the old structure and the new structure should be applied. A suggestion would be to apply a different stucco texture to create a defining line between the old and the new. Furthermore, other revisions should be taken into consideration as previously noted and/or implied in order to ensure compliance with the intent of the City's Design Guidelines and the Standards for Rehabilitation. LANDSCAPE PLAN The landscape plan was revised from the previous submittal attempting to meet the landscape technical items which made up a portion of the conditions of approval. However, the following technical items remain: 1. The site and landscape plans must be consistent. The walkway that connects the driveway with the residence, as well as the attached porch, is shown in a different configuration. .-`.5 N ntor Avenue CQ-\2005-365 2. Per 4.6.1(E)(6), Palms considered susceptible to lethal yellowing by the Florida Department of Agriculture shall not be planted. The proposed Adonidia Palms are on the lethal yellowing list and cannot be used. Change to another species. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The existing residence at 515 North Swinton Avenue is a contributing structure in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The demolition of the rear shed addition is not problematic, as it was constructed in late 1961. The proposed addition is in keeping with the existing elements of the structure. However, the existing size, scale and roof type are preferred, and a similar design would be favored over the submitted proposal. The existing addition gives a sense of change over time, while the proposed is merely compatible in its intent. Therefore, the length of the addition should be reduced by at least four to eight feet (4'-8') in order to offer a more proportionate and visually compatible elevation, which would also be more appropriate in relation to the existing historic structure. An additional suggestion would be to consider a low pitched barrel tile roof instead of the flat roof. In reference to the proportion of openings on the addition, revisions should be made. The original submittal approved with conditions by the Board on January 4, 2006 contained four (4) sets of French doors on the south elevation. One of the conditions was that no more than three (3) sets be located on said elevation, whereas Staff previously recommended that only one (1) set of French doors be permitted. Although three (3) sets have been previously approved and the applicant has proposed three (3) sets, the applicant has redesigned the entire rear addition which involves the French doors and therefore gives cause for further review by Staff. As a result, Staff has concluded that the proposed amount (3 sets) of French doors remains excessive and should be reduced for the following reasons: three (3) sets are excessive and inappropriate on the same story and wall plane; the proposed amount provides an uninteresting monotonous rhythm, and; the south elevation is highly visible from North Swinton Avenue, regardless of any amount of landscaping that might be proposed. The amount of French doors should be reduced to two (2) sets, located in the existing window openings, as proposed. The third set, which is located within the new addition, should be changed to a set of single hung windows similar to those located on the front elevation in order to avoid a monotonous appearance and give a more unified design. The square windows on the south and north elevations should be removed and either one (1) or two (2) 4 /1, single hung windows should be centered in the rear section, located below the railing. The proposed addition requires differentiation between the old and the new. While the addition, as proposed, borrows elements from the existing structure, as do the suggestions made by Staff, which all bring a sort of unification to the design, a more permanent and concrete solution should be sought out in order to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation which states that, "The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment." Therefore, a solution would be to apply a stucco texture different than that of the existing historic structure. Regarding the revisions to the garage/guest cottage, the changes take place on the rear elevation and would not be visible from the street. However, it should be noted that this revision makes the elevation very top-heavy and unbalanced. Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(6), and (E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made, subject to all noted conditions. A:F 515 N S irto Aier..e COA ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS. A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of COA 2006-130 for 515 North Swinton, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(6), and (E)(8) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of COA 2006-130 for 515 North Swinton, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(6), and (E)(8) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of COA 2006-130 for 515 North Swinton, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(6), and (E)(8) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions. 1) That the stucco texture on the new addition differ from that of the existing; 2) That the rear addition, as proposed, is reduced in length by at least four feet (4'); 3) That the proposed three (3) sets of French doors on the south elevation are limited to two (2) sets, eliminating the eastern most set; 4) That the third set of French doors which are to be removed, be replaced by a set of double hung windows similar to those on the front elevation; 5) That all French doors located on the main dwelling contain divided lights, rather than a single pain of glass, as proposed; 6) That a pair of 4/1 windows, similar to the existing 4/1 on the south elevation, is located to the left of the end of the wall plane with the similar configuration located on the north portion, as well; 7) That the square window is removed on the south and north elevation; 8) That the site and landscape plans are consistent, and; 9) That the proposed Adonidia Palm is changed to another species. Report Prepared by: Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner. Attachments: Location map, site plan, elevations, sketches, photos, historical survey. c 4 Nj,...._ . LEGEND cr '- a e= CENTERLINE CONC. = CONCRETE ?'o. COVT. = COVERED c 1 �/ LR. =5/8"RON ROD WITH CAP#LB 353 GO oGM� WM = WATER METER 1 A O G G FH=FIRE HYDRANT P _ DI = WATER VALVE 2 i. x x = CHAIN LINK FENCE \r /4P� 8 - - = WOOD FENCE Go xG1 KO�\ = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES 1 FLOOD ZONE:. X .�� • ram, / I ,,-,„. _. ,et oc . ;. t N 1L.1 :• �s.sol 7O ��s Id 47' e 'er Q o p �` r¢ s7 45 cztt . 1 W I sI8' 9'S' .�� \. 5 _ c �_ 1 y~ ' \ / Q I 2 '0 • Q. . 00 \ �b `d� _• o- t i35, 1 I 0. N - ��~ \o OG�K 90�p���„ �C' U z a LOT 12 � a fi°' '� % <6\,OG co BLOCK 4 " o �k 1 I 6-C _POLE WITH 4. �{ o c�e ANCHGY �c W I •4C •4C 'r" I-2 ! • 6�6/// pv3 -- 59.63' �0 Vic, 1 I 4 • LOT 14 BLOCK 4 MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY 350' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND MLt I, THE MINIMUM TECHMCAL STANDARDS AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IV CHAPTER 61G17-6,FLORIDA TREE LEGEND: ADMINISTRATIVE CODE;PURSUANT TO SECTION 472027,FLORIDA STATUTES C= CITRUS 9 p P=PALM PAUL D. ENGLE T= TREE(TYPE L/NIOVOWN) NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND SURVEYOR & MAPPER #5708 THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC. LAND SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION#L8353 DESCRIPTION.' SURVEYOR AND MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: PAUL D. ENGLE 2601 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY,DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33483 LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 4, DEL DA PARK, ACCORDING TO (561)276-4501 732-3279 FAX 276-2390 THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 52 DATE OF SLRVEY PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. SCALE: MAY 18, 2005 1"= 20' MD BOOK PACE NO. ORDER ND: ©COPYRIGHT 2005 O'BRIEN,SURER&O'BRIEN,INC D.279 32 83-193d • • \ - / '2�EP-rONE-' .� Pn f , •1 I 14 . \ / ,•fall..COY'. , I. ILu- � i dLU1B'tr 1LP CnP ZONED: \ O'''" Eaar. —NI gyp Ml[-,EC,E.RA, IFFA4•MU WILYsloenlAl / \ J.sass a_InuPn Boers AI e SITE DATA: ,-NEIGHBOR'S O4 TVMC/` tar wee w enR At«�►AC71p PROPOSED I-STORY / 6. / FENCE a'150:.M Mal.,..R,C.A. e ^YXETS•n•OG.TIM.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A -1-EXPANSION�— :p W PPDYtifD OTM011♦mD nomaDana my ,/ �S rPGUnRE ca+r. —� LOT N Cr DICOa Al TOJN Cr OP1MY,CID POCOL OO,4Il:INTCIUC Du11tlGT' 1t 4LL'1M'M�4.M. I ,--nH u GRADE ACCdgY'TO M KAI MEC,IS WORDED N RAT DOCK INGE 3 CF M �/' — �' Q `PmEA:Iecawe d P4lSEFACN 4UPIIY,R.CND4 Q I —_.\ \9• T \SJ / /Ell ^PET N CONCRETEIII PROPOSED PORCH 4- L EXISTING PROJE 'ATA: -ADDITION 1 4. f '., k�e - 4Ygle µO011 AIeA• «f/C PT. «I &7I �,. /�� / \ F (- _ PMp*1PAMA Y• «422.0O R«N�aM[ '%4/// n,.' \ ),'�1� �p v `""I"OeC"�~ACE SECTION AT FENCE I41eP DODO - «►YkER. .-* III G ,�i ',56,;', , , , / \ , sc.NTI . TOTAL. .10011111190.11. eMdMiL �\pp//�a/y `�:�',�.�' �%/'' /./ \1:0 \• \ YC LNTI i , [11DOR11P/nYAIO• «C.1' DO r,��• �/� i{'//� ����/,,I�� \ TELEPNONE PPOPOPe,/IWIYMO. «37•A OC CNMul AT INN RIDDC[F/'{ll0ril'.Y UT .\ •- O.RYl,4Q /%0., //5,./�//i'.,� �, /� /� / ^/ POLE . IMDIP1CV1• YAI01• «e'o 4�j /��// y i//. !%'� \ / �`/\ ITOPPID NM YAM P+vo1®alerWDTAio• «Ws �ji 'ri ;%�, ' J / 7• ' ' iit I MXAPPLICADI✓1 \\p..isp /r,////� i,'%%/%l`. �'0 `� V NOTES: �:/ /! ppZ//j'j P / - w P •• .GENERAL Mc11r.V.IeP.•e♦t TO MrNM R�ce1Q ow.i.s MMRIm To ucwwuo. - • ?; ' ��"x,e ,�E•TA" .\i � \ (/) g ``iir uamerwlaD.PwDuoDR511nPa EXISTING 1- To_.Y / / / /i=d°/, cc�g z _ 1. F 49=t \ i 7.� RENIDE,'CiE /, r/ 1 1 I or.1 %�7j�f%/•// �' W 1 a.. \\ /,./p ,,; / ,,, jy I6 6 X 35 - 4/•fy� // F north `✓.,,;///. %// % .,J/ ' / �►` N..„, ,—I N' ._ — � �/%i/ %/%; ./ � L�'� PROPOSED 2-STOR o„ �(. ;✓°f south �'' ! P„��dPP, ''�`/"'� " ; by wl. \ - BUNKHOUSE _ 0 7 �A �/i• / ��� h� /,�� / .. z mRoae• Tm, w . J RRPLlV.I/�111MInpla Z 0 w66t . —. � ----- —- ____._— •-- 1--.._.. _. (k^ ; e�11,Alc !d, T 1 `•, • i, \ �'\90'FRONT YARD WILDIN`6.T-BACK L'E ' • N ;' 12 4 C„ r /�� 444 `aa.V �Z< C,:s. - 1P—/1 / TNSNN1iE ( o i\E \ �� \ mcawer.F m i�1�; //—1 PK; � ji n rp �NE�uBDR'S !�• ¢ • 4100,/ / /- 1 ,t In \ M I // .4 FENCE\\ . �� -�1/ ''�'/7� -�!"�gY9�Lti:�- �rF. uer\sT/wa r 9 i k i/��� 0 '' I w G i r �,1 , '!�//� / .r�.� GATE f /��/ 0' %// A 1 W}�i g \\ .••_"'I 4� 1 s..E �•'NI e j/ 7'OMg rayli IRMI t pa I--_____.- /; /�� t // //�':'�'i O 2P{ �, ,�1;1!�Dg ,,..na _ /�/ dam. •3RrY Eti.._.,_. _.._.._. ///! / y ���?/' / 1 V Q `e I '�1'- 1 �A �e i; /i., %i/ w,._.. //�/r/% 1400e' t / ///n^ IRT' b C."`1C TE 61LEU4L< I ��\� • I 71 1,k•- New4rd • YK PETI�1 VDailt7lgwaa r II • 1� ;�/s A'111�C. CONCRE r- ID 714LK b'CONCRETE 6IDEW1 \- \ V (1 +-ExI6TIN5 TEL PHONE O O C. P POLE TO RE141N I _ ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 40'4' zmG•m' sm'•m• 20'•0' e'•m' imc WALL W•r•r s rY'MT weurTPLva.0 OD era wewTr ti--- roe'Wrc Weir Tauru, S oo.i i — - — - - - - -- ;�-0f TIi VZIIf'�1==C�{ v`=-f'd - - -- - -- — • J• 1NLoE NM K.C.E4•2005 Ortnrinp N.. 1 zoo- AID p cab ec.ros•tcw, 1 i 1l I fi I R •t 1'1 1 11 , 1� 1 I.i 1 Id r1 • 8 L Ill o.r r.a• r.v L w-•. 11,0 »••r ✓'v4, ).Y Jr'• r,••r.,,,, ,•... Jam. - k --"' . s i't 1- I t. '. .-. Y.r ... 9 B6LC ell n r•v r.r r•r r • rn rw v r•v r.r r-v r ra• FrtiLY fy1G77 • r t { ? f rt { - r .. -- � `` } .,•11 y —.•.r I ..r r>• v.r -]p[��(� ll:r Z r ar k � � r o _ t V/\ • W Z •.I .� . ua)owe • Y a w asziyauzzi ;• D'•)1 Pi• L Qmrr .�, } �. • 1 0•v v ' r r r.r F v � .2 + .r I r..•C a•.v 4117. J 3 OCC 4 �'• • i-I—+ i , r r r.r r-•• I'T r.r .r ,•,! WA& (n .) • �� } z C9 isma } yt f '�1 { 4F Wn =� L1 r�J 11 + is -_._ On }`L 4..4. ry A •r-13<11•v � I O' ' r,m ix-1,rr •t mrr;, r.r �� B ! = VI C } ��- 'C l �LJ � I_�.I ..t r , i W r•I w' a+r Td, I L t I w•nTe (y� X i • n t ? 7 Lp�i'iH2df Z 41 _ ,} `ter a= I —� •- -r 1 i '-� v. ri o ' ,�• J. 3.133. I .ti [ �s r. .•�,.r + r .. _•.._._r.... . 19T BEDROCf7 ,rJ� �•,- rw__f ;- ,1�•-s m�f ZGO . I � N � M .r y 3-a : ' �N M�� i ^ FQ • Ili gill 1 fnal ,lit---, • A r1TY t _ ` ` } ` a-T ♦.T . M ) -Y r-a T-Y a•Y I YY 1 T.r •Y IY.O Ir.T` 'i •i 1 i YY � 4. } ai ryr n T)►R.aA • 1` 20 IF7 2 W OIMAT r rr r r 1. r f. vr• r•r r•v .• r."� •• a-. , Y.Y l.T lr.v T•r Y.r / wa 1 „• i.r 1st. F,OOR PLAN ^rd. Fl OUR PI AN ir..i O la.r.p l li EXISTING FLOOR PLANS } i G KALE VP.M1M A NORM - Dam INC PrOjcl N0. 2005.11 4 C.40 fie No. NEWFLRPLAN.DWG _ Data .aLY 15.3003 Craving Ni. A i I ca ax)ppu Lrn.IC.imp �\ " 1 I 3 I 4 I 5 1 8 1 I 8 =, 4 10 1 11 I_ 17 1 .1 1 la • 1 d gN A / M►\ /I11I1I1111 � 11~0 11\ /li iiiiIAIAIAIAIAIAj1 \ - 11. I�I��0101.1 � •• MZ.A1A ArArAArArI� ::,;:ifA•A-w•w;A•A•:, igAjlillAl°11111111011111111 \ 3 - - - 1!.wa/.:I.•M.aw:A•A'• AA-A-A-A-A-A-A• ....1 ^aAaA.A.A.wrwrwd• 0 0 i•IA111111111111111,11111110111111111111 a€ 111 111 - - AA'AA.A'AA1.' I��w�w'A A�A'w�A�• 111 111 In Ii 0 _ _ r; �111a111 IIiiIIi • U . II. III 111 momimoviiiinimiu m, 3 -- - . AiA.1�.AiA \ A au • iil ilia u im; . - �I' 1�' II —1- 9 ,w+£kti . j'1IIjIl IIII W Z a •II —IW g W LLI - A2.I.I EXISTING, SOUTH ELEVATION A2.I2 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION o;i, y- 1aur.WI'•r•r anr.w'.r•r = c = . f- � 1 'T ,4NIIAA0100 ►`\ 2i/%qq"^1"1^1"r^1^,n;\ ����%AI1111111111111111111111 \ /i1111111111111111111111111111A11�\ /^ I.P.� 11 1 1 ./� 1111111111111111111111111i \ 1 .,�111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111�i\ �'!'!1"1 f_ ;. C t /1�1�1!1,11,10.1,1�1�1,1!101�101,1,101,1�101�111,1�I!IANi� U�� - W 111 �1111 ® 111 11 i��, wBS € I III I�11 ? E 4 AI win o 0 111111 11M1101 A 711r�� 11111 I trI1 r91- 6 IIInaeLI ,� 1; — _- -; III�lj,44 III"1.�.�, �. —--,.-- $ Q I s L Iil�III�l1:�lIIII�h p G _ li' -1-1-, I 1-1-1-, ,-Th_, 3 II- _ 2005.1 • rya rr w. NEWRRPU, WG - A213 EXISTING VEST ELEVATION A2.I.4 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION F.21.7007 WALL W•r•0' Drw4,p No. - A U/ G A1 ., .. -- �Jm.i I 1 , I 'I I_ 4 I 4 L 6 I 7 I_ 9 L ^ In I I I 1 19 1 '3 I 14 - I .t' N 2041I 1-3 " err Ara,, - 9 i I I I 8 11141 I I L r +-a�- I L. K O 0 _ ® ® - W � N r fll �� 1N1 II �;I,•lll�,r 1 —r ` �Z ' k t . I O_Li _ N —\1 -le-C) I LM OF'LYICCr TOrYtd I /',GI\IRS 2 / S°alnn°aa rw a t1Opt7 1 ROOk1 / >-o r riniti �� �'I r/ 6 N ei e, I t- , :i: 07,a EIEEEIITIS 2- ARG E f19 6AT , $ti4 0 A 1 , irta ,.. Li00 J ,! Y, L / -1] '-':- (;\,' Lii:: 'l — ——._..-�. -- ® , OFFICE _ .:♦♦ _ — 3 4 gy• . '. --- — —::rrn ___,C,___ .La_ .. ___,, jlii 1 1 - 21 E ; - Lp M C/ M&AWRY Yak f LM OI GICW,M MCp WtMY-----� -! - 0 ~ o W O 1 g E WALL LEGEND, I ® ® p, a( MI WLL fI01TRC41YL MUMMY O Sy p _ Y11Y? V I:, VW (" , rI Ir. r� NI, . y InOILw IGN tawIrAlRRna t(t I{ I' f ,Ir f rr rr =.I4 f'M1t PARTIP1 O Cf1a WAS. "r'---' 0 SY1 CL9 LEGEND: O u °R aTTI{ISM0IM 4 4 - p DOM T117,KZgmLL1 GARAGE 1ST FLOOR PLAN GARAGE 2ND FLOOR PLAN Y G Doom'mane OW) Y..'v-VY•r•r lull.U{'•r.r R GARAGE FLOOR PLANS I i- ICU.vs..r.r xAc rtaaR.t Na. r GARAGE 1ST FLOOR AREA* GARAGE 2ND FLOOR AREAS �'�N uoGn.lw. �;�,,. . NEWFLRPLANAWG 4A AaI� .wwr. Iwwlrr.r .w n'L `?4'; Da4 /'H Z/% AIG.24,2W5 ///f I Droving No. TOTAL GARAGE FLOOR AREA; "I/'' / 11I TOTAL MLA, .W In n ✓iif� \\ F�l • mmmw I 1 . 4 I 5 I R j 7 I R I IS I I 1 I 17 I ',C 1.f A 12 6 7111-- ---4141.10101111111011010100101P4`, 410111001101000111111011111011,i40111111k.------— ...so'-Pi-. .4101611.1101; ITP, 1,.1-110.01101401011010111410101011101041011/41101101101111041 0— ..1,1111010110061,14111111'` —I 6 IMOLA/.TIM WV TO MO.MOMS 1.1 .,1011004\*A011011*00141011011001114/11111A1411104 i .414114140400111101110110 - ..,, 1 1 1 m -,-0141•01.0•4•01.010iiiiiAttotootoiNfoi4mi ,. ItIlY..WO TGFC,IWFOICOF It!WM /40141110141.0010.111114.111!Illihi•,..----VM""1"11"2"4" it 04.13.10 Mow satvAnal 10 MUM 1.MOYMato Allik . tgi...a;V 6.,Mkgt RaitlIF.IK- /:Ii!ll!ll.#10-01111141.1141.0011.41,11!.1111-111-4101 , .. . , .11• a- - 12.321•T 000611371.[A110*AS IMO NUM • • 111 Di LIN i in ,--MOM,GOT VOW MOO DALZMI TO WWI //-.—OWNS 1.004.TO KO MOMACZO ON NM 11•ACT 16.111141,MOO*TO he. Alt, Allik illIWZIA ' 1111!MIS; I • ,I le / 7,--OWNS OC1.101.1T MN PALO AT MT TO WWI nto .. .i. MO ISKONTNIIX4 WNW TO MO=POMO . /' la , _ / ..wir,...i., 7 „ / 1 1 II MI ski— 101/„.11DOMP OUZO MOH'TIM TO 111111 !el M. rams ROMA.CIO/NOW INDOUI IOTIOMP WALT MISTATITCATIOI1O WC.*TT',"II / III 411111 /,' te I 1.11_Li:111.11 Al 0 / -•''' / ... •• '''''... _.....__ ____ _. .__.••,..—__ . Sjilroliii Ma FLOX __Pri1111 , . 0 , ---d i ilnemailr /, ____ •=17....... 1 marcumunviccuemuswilo I 4. ions 'NINON MIME MINN '.s /— ".. ----- \\1 ".*-- -*.\\(I 0 - IIIIIIII1 IIIIIII: . -,•T C011t0.0.11,&WM=MI AU —-.VII lit it I To '"--- _ 0 tri i g7;i7;77f:77-17247;F371777'f 0 En 6 p ,,, ,,,,// ,,,,,,r, , ., "*.e43P*10044, AIO6 w<e 4.0e.4rn',13, k:,ti,Vg;;,ApA 'kegrAWAY0i00,9 >-.6g —1 TIMM ICOFOX MOO 11170S01024101011INGII PAR 2 ij 2 A3 ARCHITECTURAL WEST ELEVATION x WALL Ve.r-ir W i 6 , ....- re4. ---- -.... 4."--- &MOIL.IOT KOMI MOWN, .,.- 6 Trp.r- •,... ___ • z z ....„, -,. . .- „:I. MINI CSOMOOTO.Frift TO MUM - 4-41111441.11 141100.101164 9 ii.r...TiZ:T.:::ZPZ:Z::..liii A- ' •=7;:11•Orr461161.1XF TIMM 61!1 1 r' • 0.."A.A.A.A.A,.../.1 • • i .ifill -- ___:::.....MALT 1.111147/Xf 111130111 TO 11A101 MINYA MICA talisman g I ill. 14.1117 — — ------ 0, MOM MOAT Iowa CAM TITICAL -WOUCOYIT OC.IRALIOI11111170CRTUOR MOTH%MCC &e. . 1, ii _ _.] V-- 11, iii " , 7 _.... . 4 )til I 1! ____, ..- ,•-- Psi-4,OnaiLUMEMINS 20 PIROPLOCR ..... ........... &NM Ter CIIIMICOONI V• — toot.coca. Cr POMO Wrool.o.”14.1 .......- c A DOM Al10.1 —— MOTO*OM CrOMPOO MC/011M 0...11OTY - 111,1 iii- 1! I 11-1111 A A r-,71 A ..1 -El- MOO CV MO MOO MITA=POSOUill Mal DOM b III 1, • ill I 1 VI li I V V--' •` f:If—V .) D ______.....---,..WWI=OW.O,MOO MOO TO MOM IDOIDO OCNOIOCNI '7-'11.--,:‘41 IN 1 ..:.:.;:.:';.:'‘;1.1 El 1 'Ml r:. • ; IM I II' 11 L _.---- .RIMINI IIIIWUTII(WM KR MOM/ , I.Lj \ / ,—.1121 PM AT PC001 ., ------- ,:,..007fl "--....... -- \ a C '/W/i4k P FT7511771g',5 ,;/000/i0PrAFT5 I , ',2,..•Y,,V4:,Op%;,,•tz:,,6,0/;.,r,=?4/t4ye.o',4z ,04,,&,, A -icf,,,,,;,,,i,-4 i,,,,,-,,,,f,'f',,,,,;,./'.i,,,f.:,,,,,F/;°.,S,,,,t,F,,.; .4+1,,4•34,,o/ Om,'',../voelAPio„;,'4,4‘2,',‘,R•o,,,olx,•w,„-7,-,04,1,•ft;44/074 ,„,tml',40f4.01r,'//,,, •,,,,A,V:9:14/,,/4,',)•,,gaa/W41,,Aie,,,,7"; ,,,,, '••• 701,0fgq4(.);q•lif4,1 ,7,,4•N 20051 3 ''''/FAVA43).10.,3'0% CJI)IIT lb NEWFLRPLA WG Dato AUG 24,200S _1447011:0/11109DIMIVIC.1 Drorlp Mo. ...-- A4 ARCHITECTURAL SOUTH ELEVATI , ,, ,\\ „ !CALL ve.r•r , r , 9 I I I I I , I N , - I N I 7 , 10 , 11 I 19 I •3 I 14 1 ri C 0"� Ise M.ru ML.le Mick Deerw �- /•7TAAi1�lA1��1xA1A�11\� n T . �- 6 rr . „� \\ Iroao.n�reiruraumMraoarw IAIAAAA".N1r1AAlA�., i \ -- Irlorciernf wocrcrr,fee ixo omameroMra Dann •'� �'• /--- oonnrcMmw►ro,ewr i'I� Iw�1 AI1MMrn/aI Ala A0141. I. ij�I�I�I1AAMAAMI►R�A� irr. a ^`- ;::.'-,A i IA14I I � I��AI��I�IAIAI i•I IAr 101~01AA . IAI 1 � Rzr,rsiv------------ ........ ,Ae AI [I A A _ A A_ A !!A ----------- . Ill I�AA�I?I��R_ALI_i.l.e� _ -'--• ,�asrrma awresar--- - =-.- -� / ��\` DaIW Rol YTDI1LAOi1 rol�wl y Y" ill 1- - - r \` -Ie erA:l Reirm1 yawl To Mrw Dare MI e o , Ir% arr MN ALLe Po cwnlsn VIM&rr'rx L III El 1 1 / ecocAiw.rcann. co.rr.rr. IMPIII -- } � eeiwi III , sII���---� xnLx ea�warw w ae1i1l1idl''• --.,.., j INIMILAREA1-." a.. :•r+Mexllbgl-. ... _. �I ----lfectnL..fuer rcrw+L a•.nrrx j wr►.1u liwrArt oowro Mtol COMA oriri ,t r_ _-•�� ,- }- �;�. tsiooAauL ericrui rrcw FOR Warm • �— _•.�• •••••.. •-- weerwoAxaw j� _..---------.-.. -.7, .. , . �- Z LI - N=a o a IX n I wnalermsnu'I a 141 r.W.4 • 1Ztllanl Lrtgalsnitoa Kan71 W -1 P19 K rl A ARCHITECTURAL EAST ELEVATION i GO _ WALL w••r.r W _ _ .--' A1111 �6TYP _ �iI 1ArAAAIAIA': Z ;A;A;A;A;A;A•A;., • A a -:. 1111A1A1AIAIAIAAIAI I�IArA I IAMMI r .�1A A A1A1A A A A. A A 1 1 1 L L •i i•I I I��AN�AIAMA 1 IA1AAia1 .-...__...__- ---- �,..+.r viW DNA.A•A A.A 1 A 1A•A. �N.IL7LTgacanu Awneur i F Nrterltt,feilArt YDQ.roMiplPial•LL1r.ICJL,INtlNLf-�I�IAIAIA�A1A1A1A1AI IeairAW01101 A/LM ereli,TO CaLM1 Duna n.1cAL- ;�•c.ii - - = _< - _ 1r colt�CII,lY1.CJL-.-,� r 6� ...... II i4 r— ! -' �' --•--'.`_--...._........_. �+�mLs�Lr,waearwwrerinai Q AiAi'�iAiA \ Cr) _ hiII I e I A,AIA1A,A _-.....__``_.__Dare WO ADM lnelDr milt GOM%10 Iow1 III 1111111 ^ _ IiRM DIWeir' At.W PIWtIm MIMeYDa. un1 uei+.,r n.1cr wewArt oreo 1m 1Naa►ro Mra DOirH orirne L� s'M• 9 / _....., � I \. enwxTaaoann wrlillltme / i C Mel aacriae IfYt7 n0 r•ODOWDWI---- ay.n ar is GrmavrvaLAlolrau 2005.1 .t7 OD Ai, ARCHITECTURAL NORTH ELEVATI F P WO •ICU/W'•M1♦ Dote AUG 71,200s Droving Re. 1 lu ran IS © AU 1 , 2 1 , r 4 I r c .. ..----- - .� _ of — • I 3 , 4 I 5 I fi 7 I A I I IA I II 1 11 I 13 1 14 I 1 `1 ,y 9F G i / �i waUrrulmro/uttu Odd /72 . ���T~\k 8 6 TYF. �/•1� ��� •TOY TOGO=COM101l+m4Mild Id COO.OTrld11.4.1d$TOPUT•Oltd1.1 �'tA0111001��1A�111^. -A1 MAC — 1110011.0010110101414111114111�n� 101IIIA1II MAMti . / 110111111111110Mr1111111111110 A' i 1AI 11.01. 1 0011Ah ./11511A1_ AIAMAiA/I0AiA14MIRig0.10- A1A1!i\--•--------•$ 7,1 arr lr,molar-- m •• - --onto WC"anal IT LAMM ` •- • • - - / .. 1 - - _,•`./-----.wnncr tm oI1r TD14T01 COSMO ,,_ _;_ <d- I /_ --.�—._. d min Redd 10d DOM TO TMrgI Meld 7!Y■I III 1 ;, _ -- -wDraum,<wn�nalwa�u.�awmrs+rowneenoeena w a1YCDC TOMatM'To MON MINI -..—.... 1 11 I. II1. _ 41un� ' �\ I IIIIIIIII .-- ��riweaaewewTam2aae 110121 ,- --.----•IE erniavemat COMM i rot er YDOO 10IL5Td SWIG \\ I wcuim LOW rvo nanmlt.o.V1D0.111 II ,-...4 11...L. -47 .-- \ ' I:1 ,.r. .... _ - 00-z- ,, - - , 014121! 1 W , .,_, t....-g_ - laig , rr _. U Z $gH�2Vv �* W N I F I 7TiXra oa.AX&arum TOO'.. Z 1 N7a . w DOOR TO DxcnD•KOM1tO LOTTO 1110X TO DOCK) ILl 0 Q Lem D1IQDM UTA 241(rradAr 1 I J H •,--, / •�•..__ .__.. Il/l1 OIld LL1i1N1.�10i 7fipO6MU0C JNo re'I 1n Z> 0_ - Al GARAGE SOUTH ELEVATION AS GARAGE NORTH ELEVATION i�0 W auu.Nr.r•r aaaaw`.r•0' W c I-- F U eg. I Oi t Dam Prof.HI. 2005.1 , co FIN NEWFLRPLA WG Oaf OM.24,2005 Paling Ka. IG.cac rxC2 W" A..e� • • I I I I 4 I 5 1 0 I 4 1 '1 1 110 11 1 12 1 .3 1 14 DOD" -- DOM FRAME MUSKS OM DOOR/MAH DOOR/UANDCUFRAME REIARe MATERIAL KEYING LEGEND ROM _� Ma CeLTHC DETAILS ®aK 1os .V RDCI'1_ UL k lAll MATT_FPL _DE._,LeILS ATYIR 1WR �i�ai ®g ma TrP. MAT. FN. _H J.J.S n4M4TENHILL w 'modIW Y-Y T•I ♦ eC D%O FM IMAMCORYW•M ISM • FM1Y-1'%1'.IW KRGIMIOM.ra' _rSr--_7-�)! (�7-).-1 .._.. ,ILQO--tM now MKI IuMl.WI MYWN IRW pop* 1M _1/Cal T•r T. A eC t<O PIN 06LTOD 6T 011O1 • Y%T .141W■ 0 (•) 1-1 ___ 4.R©--arm MMG=MLR OIMw DX. a FMY.Y%T•r 44ye1 •YY .TOM'WMO/0 O _ ____ W__FAIR WPM'HA=MOW O111YWY MCI OMIT }/� - ■ TJ'%I. _ %4A w1I .NW W ■I MAW 4 _ 0____ M K _ Wen\r MALT MWMtMT MOO.LItP101 XL* i a AI A .4.4H%*Y.)' aLIMOI wF4W w r.V WM1\0 I -_-- Q 01-•- WRAP MALTIWtaMAAPIRI MOLY,01R WO RYA 101001M/O'MY Ai •4 M11 r%MN tNLT RICH wt•Y wr.10 WMA0 M a - _ ____ © - wow mom IMO,M NCO,N0 0 IOR Oty TO MT ICW DOMacrp•o C .T%wr Lwow .FY .FY WMMO _ _ -__ in - ',owMAGI MIWIAMIOO•WWI SF O Y.T%.Y•W AMAIN .Fr we•r LW AMMO e - _ -___ AL AL •I-- wpm MM M■WTMI GM.OR OOM ■ PAR i+•T%IW OW011W RR ••Flea.r•IWeWI'MNO \ _ _ .____ 0©©--1W1 n (R1.11OYR nun Miunoa CMe/fRYDW10 MOW!,O coma VM �i- F AMPLE YI%AL,]O RATM= .Y.TM.FIM'.N'M•10 (1 _ ____ ©j©©_-IRFR?WPM IIMCI I••MGR WY KM Y00.$0MTO4 DWTMI*We . E LEGEND . 1I p AIIWRIOTiMOM1Y p 4Mw1 S 0 KIJAIM•Rz f�—Y'r r• .. r•r / YI r•P r AN I I MI ® P■i•11114C AAA An AWN W DYIIW ORLI-N. I I; T• .. 0 ® OMICMD@0•YO WHI __� 11 W OLMMAN ';�-0■M OLAM NTERICRPAtELDOOR ® men•4w yy NMI —� 1�■ ` U i� � '� i al F ��e i Z In J G1 INTERIOR DOOR SCHEDULE �?- N.,W, ,�a1~4 R,V.r. W ..1,---__ '� VAHOXTO'Crnm1W N 5a O 0 0 O x<g PAIR TRLE FRENCH DOCKS Q19TCH GARAGE DOOR PAIR DINDED LITE FRENCH DOORS DIVIDED DOCK g O W,m W H yawl •minir0 (i)i k- 0 LA N ♦i i W A.AMCW IMCCL MYlW M I14L 0 N0 }yTT�^ /��+• fit-' _ J - 2IA i qy J I,� ; -- F_ 6�i i �as oanwl•°a -'1 •illI 9 1 ♦S CI FLOM Gel 2 G ! • � O OI T tf 1 % F REPLACDENT CASEMENT REPLACEMENT ARCH CA°.EISIT REPLACE]ENT PAID AVM CASEMENT GENERAL NOTES Oh 14I r-T .Y1"r i IIQDIOV!!- MA I FOLD 11101TICIIALL SWUM.MO Oferall MN SO MOM 111010111511VAM1191 E , - W a,MOW MCA,MU,At oili ,av }i NOM WI 1—� Y F ACUM i 1Ii1t MDDWRGD "wt iIIll:I:llI;I O50MR1W114WN1*1I.4OMMI•LI1i0M w••A■1a1010A1 COON lef KM MNAW■ III �'"o° '. ' ,s1.1.1 Ui L % . 1• «M=»ROOM BASE I FLD°R WALLS CEIL FEM4RCS i == PURL MPG On ------ 111 1 • C !}t! tEJII1! i ;.; .I . tII 111 III S1 7 1 1 S i 1 i �� t.._.{- _-_ __ _ N+Iwlnwreto..................._._...._....___...__....._—....._..._.._...-_.-__.__._._.__--_.___-_._._..._`-_._.__... aT.:.ram' 0 VArIW2C ttYOMO.T1 W NM 0 ® 1111101111111111 A PCP Le MA11Wr 0101F41101 O AMID YAW MM■OI C•MOl1 pYN IOIp1 O1MO1■W14W1 W AOh■Ai WI=MI6 PAIR C RJ.IEW CASETENTS TRIPLE SNUB 1-1 kI WIT M°mm■a15=I naMMwIW1cRw04a 1101■4 3 C. 1401411,111,I0M14~1im ,a0101 1 4 ga 4m. xIt e • Flo*•F 2005.11 E1 pY Al.No. schedule.dwq Me - , AN.10,2001 y % y . v Cl RciI ' INISH SCHEDULE H8 EX-7R DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE > A$•Oi:] m corl moincrs.LA..._ • -_._ I r -------- \� d _ • • a 'Pd. 12 ' L__J ' ^� ILMRS CP IST�P'•LOOR ADDRION) , I H / ` I ExISTING OvEI�PLow SCUPPERS E To RMAIN 4. �� O o ��rAIIA2A�A. A2A2Aui»i � � � \‘.'----T----- -,--' fj Ea t Ea ,i,, I I AOGN TOP OF MU DOORS w/T. ' �/ c CP EXI NEW E?ti�6.WINDOW MOVE I -' OP ExISTLN6 WLNDOWS,TYPICAL. /-r" pp ^; -• —H— c..:, .. 1-1- I r, r. ' Ili II iN....t:I_ If r+ Q — I' I 1!) I' IDS ��f �' 1 ii ___. III I �I -- - • -1 / _�_ „..„,„:„:„...,,„:?...„,:....„: I �j _—=�L— \ J f t, - ,„,:„,,,„„„:,., II41 . �III� I • J I " ' -` -```' /////%':ii',/,"�;:7/,y/i.///r% '/%/A /.//ir,g, ice%/y�/�� //•// 7-7'0, /r' 65/%,-/ `�� '/'7/'i7 r,.,. �;//i//�,ii//� / / .�i.'„ %✓ ,,',,,%/ /., �/////`% i;/r i;.' - ///,i/ / • /,',r,�j/'�'.,r'//,// /ia' ////��/%,/ir//r,//i�/,•�;/ •. //i7:,,,/ NEW POOL ISEPAR4TE PEWIT RECLINED; %�%i %fi/// /f /4/ /,///!,•gr,o,i. „//.,,��� % j'�•%/ //-r// , r r, ,,,/ r r ' i''���r; A / / / /• / / , ' �4/ , ri , -/07 / i/ / / :/ // / %/i % .� �'�/, ��i/,i•,%/ice!. . wi. ELEvA--nO? PR PINED NEW OPEN AIR PORG+ /4.13)01.45 : 'bOOR% . f rUR,4L SOUTH ELEvATIO /`� \,------ ... —,/- 'V 1 • ii• (LIMITEr CP MST R.0011%AMMCN) ecIr ., %,_'-'s•••... 0/11p>.,••. I __ _ ___E;.:0740___070a ecurreR6 TO!REMAIN 14041040411111 . . t A ELEV.t-Pace. 11111111001111111141. • 0 0- V APPROX TOP CF i 1401401*AmpRipgrii.` . 0 0 Eh •Ih. A $4111.,0a11 i 11010111011•11 _ IA. A Alkisilkno • • • "Alik A 011ik 61110.4104N/4 t •i - NEW IMPACT RF-61 - - _ , eillbil Willi NEW CCNT.PREC.4 _ \,,„ E 1•01i IMmomml i.-1------- ,-."'''''' „---.- / NEW WfitC(13NT IRC ........., _.....r/'''''''. man.•••••1 L _ , ___.i, _ I _ 1 Ea Ea L — ti oreRox op 1 - LOTYZOcc ELev, --4- APP*OX.TOP OP f .___ NEW MOO)TO F E OP NEW DOOR• (IDd6T1411 WINDOI G co Ext•T'cl.WINDOW MOVE I ALIGN TOP Of NEW 1:)°°R5 iiii T. -as EX611`a WINI,C"'TIP/CAL .- i +Fi.. ....- ::_r:\+1-1 1_, 1,F ri- . , 1 i A r- 1_ -,ii i vinlitol T \;,1 / \- . 1 1 1--s 1_11 -.11 IF Li _ ____ i I- - I I kin IN THREE(S)NEW ei NEW EXTEMOR W LINE OF EXII4.14 ----..___ , .....4::,-; I:i -I III \il il L. --- ___________NEw mrs AT P( *;:!:::t. / Alb. 4 PINI6N QOM J 'I . ,\ . r i . li-- - i \\ , N. ,. . / --V APPROX.TOP a 1 ':::•ev:, - 1 ::•?:•!;:•: \ ze:::•:;:el ---, f----- \ :$;•:*!-. \/ rt.;;•%4 1 i _ z....%.:•;.>-:. ...-- o Ve':! ,,, •,;7 /,',/w, •.1-7.7.;?", ;...,/ .A, ;,,././.;,•,;,7,A; M: ACW4%.,,e,%/,',:',///,/,:;.:44-, - 7•/.. /'/,'.;:..". 9'i'•*/7'i.'•."•,,4z,',7/./A.',/%7, 0-.•/,;zi///./.',%.0.% • :';.,:••'0%'/,r.'.%•,;P'%,. .•-": 7 /4•:;•:?., ,,,/?.:, //./ ///,;•-, ;;.'„: ,;,. /y, •/w,...;:w..,,, ,;,.„/ 27•,,,: :, ;• r', ?0,:::.,.0 ,-.,,,<.'.:.,-.fj..;r.;/7/..,•,,,,.:7,,, ,,, ::,.....2..x„0„,/....,,,,,,,x,,,,,,,,„:,y,>//// ,,,,, ,„,,,„:x., ..4/..,,,,,„ :;,,,,:,,,,,,,,,,,, /;',4,): :,;''?'%';y•//' '1?,:,,...V;4 ..;:''',;///''74>0‘,. //Aft.V../ . ....:;;/'%W.7/,'i.://(/?//,'..,,'%,(% ' ,//'/,''/'/'/%'//.// :','"';'4',WX>(, /, -7, /,' :4,,X., /,/' ''''/'•''.. '.?,:.;,.: ‹Wz.:;/,'''.. .,/!;.*'%':'''W0', ' ;7:,''...?r...;. /,';''/ ' '''' ;•//•/w "/) /07.:‹V'4"/'/ /.4%.0e:::',C.N:':' :':W:'7.. ':;'; ':;',Vi.:::•V':::'/0;;Aff*//;V.'''''e4,1:04/ 7. , 0,;;, ,-.,4,,, ;',(./fA„4,,,o.,.w.-,,,wp (;';....,:d.,',•;%.1 :.. ',,; ',A:::?.''...).....:;..,:,,,,,-::•. :,%:00j5;..', *,/!///'.uy0,„,::,/gW#V,,,//.,.A...M•/,,,,m%.:0,,,,:•,,,W.'igl ..,;.,....V.,.. :4,..://mk;:w,,',/,':,;,:.;f:/:1"%x,-%;V•, //';'..: ::::„% ',*'--./.,7,;',W.%,V•,,-`A?".y*',;',.".;,.,' *%53%.%/WOV"," A*Vh:WO ,, . 4,- ,?4i,.,::/,./,,,,2'-, :-;-0-,..:,,,..,:,:;:x,./../,o.x;:: :,...:. y/7x4,,, .,,,,',,,,,4y,;..,,,,,O,7 '.'.. ,,./ft-;'• w ,2,,, ,17.,/,:•:,:*;0/.-..,-....;;/..,.::: :< ,, ..,:',. ;,,./.;:7,.. :.:;:;q;.•:::::.:VM/,/',7,,,,;/a'4,,,„';',474, „,/, A 0., ,//,/:0, :A../..,0.',, ,;4*:;7;.;,/,,: , 5.;0*.4.0:7,0"*:...';';/';:•"%:? :.07,,,'";;;: g7%':;:W:', ', 4%/70A%',"%M/q,';C%%.''./fte.4.**:•00A4',Ael* ,,-/,.. .;,. .,; / .-;"%•';,% •%%%":A".';':',V;:. •;,:','''),%..... .".7•:./<,///7//7,,,O,..,://::• ;;:,7--//,,;/v, 1,:,,,,;;;77;,.,vo, •41;:5:.;,%;;;/ct.;;st,.0,;;;:::: /;;;.:x::;'',;.::::.7;;..?..'..,,:. ./Y,'.4. ,.,--/'i?:-;//x, /,,,VA:,1, :4,,,%/,,77t/./ft: PiN,,7%/..;;;';*:/4 "4•0% 4'',4.4,' %/•". //,0, ;045/2"S.;,/%/,%/,'. /N7/'7 PROM=tell OPEN Ng PGRCN —,..c. -,r 5.00 TH. ele\A-11 0 Id ri-1 ELEVATIO / ____,, tem\set, By Larkeport41 ?(AA kiDOWS,1 VilteNle-44-It$0012.6, • (LMITO OP MOT FLOOR ADDITION) ,( EXIOTNG OY£RPLOW TO RETMN ``� O 0 O • 0 f W'� � 104 A,A�A�A A�A�A�Ai .. NI ELEV a 19',0' - = IA9A1A9/!I�A0/►�/19A9A+ 'k $APPROXTOPOFE ' ' ._- __ _—�- - — -- NEW CONT. EC, 1 1 �. i / NEW CONT.DREG J l( 'mil :'� NEW W® USWT IRC t/ R 'l- ;n' APPROX.TOP OF I T Rooms _- ,1' �v...9',8' -----------------� F $A)"PROXTOPaF( ALIGN TOP of,NEW DOORS W.,T � i OP E)CIS°F NEW A`T 4 WINDOW ADOtrE OP EXIOTNG WI DOW6,TYPICAL �c � --- fir-JrNEW WIPDOIU TO D �—' T.47:7 p-- j � IEXIOTNGWND01 11 a r�llil� �_ ��� r -. i?) ; 1 �W •:% 11 ' I':! i �II I� `.,� h T 'J i JAI 11 y i __� / 1/NE OP EMOTING i i \ / —�Apt �-NEW OTEPO AT Pc i / / PNIOH GRADE L • AF1pI2UX TOM'OF I tJ �I i 1...... ., t __--i;i:;rir,::�::97-%: ::z!,ir..:::•; �i:'.i '.%,• ;i;!•'':? //' l'/�;li /,'% /j"% ' I i �� ',;;L/.. ,/.;.,.,.; .., s.;.. , //:/;../�%/. .i/>ii , '•,!%./;:r,'„ / /a> i.3.?.s,, �', —NEW POOL IOEPARATE PERMIT REQUITED) io �%`' :'/ ce%:>'• ,rp ,/., .,�% ;;/..../r,.'r....././.;`,:�/, PROPOSED NEW OPEN AIR PORCH rH ELEv4TI , �won Art will, As if J-10 yjj 40 Rpm=54ii; not Ono 77 OTI a._N k ,.\sC R �. as 7r z . r �,.s".. ''S" -4, • ". ,' - a�c�..... �..,,J';,rJx ,` P -e,m''�T' sx, ��• � / t �. 4 x p ' 1. .• r 71`r T i € t q . .rtw,v 4 r.6 S 3 Vv:r� g i }i t 1 ' 1 �.•: E.Y:. ry F -<1 ?�.r : , >c t .> • - v.'a♦ 'T' x• 'Yk •. ° fi.-'fitz . � • a>e -�7. .r; ia:..r.. inss : '^li 1 -.,y ' Y +"- .. .a •^. . f Se . � • `�•`� ° :S'{.:=.'e;:`Rt tir \ ^ F '` t' U\, ,: •x t v , t : t ..: `7 4, . _ _. F k '..a.Ra• ! .. '? .k'.�'''t_• ,. t i i''' • • • 4� I 0 _ 11e, • ��y .. . '.:it''' J. p } 1 1 t'i t f� q },y S,i'y > •E�. : fix.. >,• f"•�f�, q i . t E;tt,i."a: . ,,t r� • I. \ 1 } •t. it y �S�ti tI • - II 't Spa""� � .� .Sec gym ;.. 1 W Plie .. L� � a•ir'! "j )..'g,, t "''ti •rid.0- �< - a i .._t si x. • > .. �� �' � .W, Z , �t " ttt il ,• • • t, 2,. \` . . s•• �9s .ram?rti. ti.••+' ': g:.rx"� iP'�a L ` .' ,ti:; '.'n+ 7•d.'fir;• • t Y l �{ `'� .. • t j `` ".' , .�.,£r:. I • tt I ` �`- �.. r 'fit• :• ��� . `�v� ��.a _' t • it. a. :3 ' ,, q Yq. • :jw�^ veil . t Yr► _-".-as�"�r - ,�' • fix; r t" 1 = .r � , 3 _ T fj.3 rt J..Lh i tS E i '»err e'11 *� r �' �' s � } A •� • 1 • � x�^ ri • . .i 7 t> ; a 4 1 ?r'a rrt x�s £s g. - I• 'e " f £$i §j . �,i _ d �i � k F•. �4 V�; P(e € d 1 .1 1s �i k a.� � , t, r 4 "� 52 E �.S t ��{{�� "f �ec. f ^, i'et _ u, L ttI.,fir -Art,,,'":,y L rf Y3�}nt a £ j7 f t `�1 `w ,4 tei d5, e�x .f :* ':. - d a?+�"Iii:.G Y '�f. Td� .ape p y.,.£ T. £ rt .Y ^s =r ems¢" yi ra ti. /fy��1 , �' "® '-bra c' ✓r k,. 1.., g i `. .. DELL RAYR H BEAC F All-America City " 1111! 1993 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2 001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting REGULAR MEETING February 15, 2006 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION i)r\ ( NJG A )0tC0r0iii- roaef.„ Cday Utidiciirb-c-- (77,-7 -ram Lorvirtx,( rcc-?_A-(\.) sTot id .rd-touv6v1 /40z