The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB 03-15-06 AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: March 15, 2006 Time: 6:00 P.M. Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers, City Hall The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program,or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings,and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER - II. MINUTES February 15, 2006 III. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS A. LDR initiated Text Amendment to Sections 2.4.6(E) and 4.6.19, and the definition section as it relates to protection of"Historic Trees". Recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board. B. 6-Month Moratorium of Demolitions, Additions, and New Construction in the City's Five Historic Districts. Recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board. (Report may be further refined and discussed at Meeting.) IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. North Del Ida Estates Lot 2 — 116 NE 7th Street, (Formerly 106 NE 7th Street), Del-Ida Park Historic District,Andrew Spengler, Owner. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with the New Construction of a Single-Family Residence B. North Del Ida Estates Lot 1 — 112 NE 7th Street (Formerly 106 NE 7th Street), Del-Ida Park Historic District,Andrew Spengler, Owner. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with the New Construction of a Single-Family Residence C. North Del Estates Lot 4 — 111 NE 6th Street (Formerly 106 NE 7th Street), Del-Ida Park Historic District,Andrew Spengler, Owner. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with the New Construction of a Single Family Residence. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Reports from Historic District Representatives • Board Members • Staff Appeal of 711 North Swinton Avenue VI. ADJOURN Amy E. ACvarez Amy E.Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Posted on: March 10, 2006 r."--/9" '6" /-5- 6 c-fg4'f7'%- .?t‘ : LL jThr 7 ei.sci S C ,ZZE/Q" ix,o7 • „L 7 r CMG 1 h A-frick �. 2a Ir . 2r) , s_ , , ,....„..„--- ,._ _ __„,„, ,672.4.2„ 10--orn edatt . ,-,310, / /}4\------ -- -,I-IL% - j ,,) c:_i _____---r/g f -- ,..._ I/•0a / C-P�� ___________ A V'( A )/l)" vim- ' ",. 6-"P"--- e a / ,,Z.' 0 N. ------ a2)-r- E a \-2 y , c-), ("/ '') b___, 4) A/ ,-,_____„/ ,.; i&A-9,____ ,___ s„.., „...... c & ono U V V' Nr - _ rq d c__ L__, / e t9L - - ----- - - r\,( a) r i_ I - - ---`vim ---- - - /� ) �� 7 6 Cv--- , ,2 ' / \' / 2 ., - —7.---6)1_, , :a.:7_,4 o Did - de- J.0 / n-AJ c 2-14 (f_t, -, ��, ��A_ ,\ I-- j z,1 11 C. i722/t91 ) 7 ) .2- Z c, d� 4,- ...---4/7,,,,,,4 / z --e--7,_,Azi,7Z. v //„,t,i71 C- a_ (1 .— . cr— /1771?''' ' \ 3 v c 2, "/"/a,r :31� i /, ____,=, e/2 i?' 3e7c= Y-) ZI,Ast, c:._7 6 b _a-IC-CI— Arr) ,4-/ ) ,A- /( ---6--' ) ‘2.. N, (7 YI ,--, ,et,t7;4° 7 \ ),_. ,e, \_- ) . / - • .___ ,,,, ) you„, # e, ly) ji c y, J / ii._ 16. / .___l4, 7 C 0 ° \ 1 ,,/ , 2 ..__, e__. — ) 'q ' ,-----42_, Ai40-&-4-' c_____.•d—N' / - i_e_„( z „___-/( 7 "—e-- 5 "y f —o-, * - N zzr? )/ - /0 a ' I c N (0) e, ( . izz c_> z � �� 9• -- .77/(c2C °4 r - A 1k.D 1• ► f cam — 0140 111) 111 gi I AIL P74 a44421,41.4 jeusi • x72 )/- ' \ ••\ --- 1 —J �- t - c = 776' m) 474 J 0 — , corl 22 f rb 1� _____-c:F-- ,2:4 _____, 7---- ._______T _._6) ,____r (9L- -2--/D P----- -/I/ 'c__- --2- ei7 ,„ A t-- _ao,,aLK_ ' 7-) -) -----,_____7 -,±, .---- ----" e--- ,__i__ ,- -,... / ,,,cam / ----- -�- T�� .� „.,th 7 Y-� _ f 1 p 77 _..........0 irg.r..----- _. __. . , .7Th No 4L 72a • V" ,„----- /)7 ._71f,' \ al -7/ , - /7 f - / °Z _ / . ,4 d c;2-- 6 "'"1 C.) \ - 4 G-- I— — Ce ) J-- Qi L_.... ,,,k ,/-1,. ' I / /# , ,----,,,-------: /', - . . , ---- atialluk ) _ 4? , / 2 C-3/6° m (, 13 2i/ 1 ,----0---- -- P 727acJi6 I (- -_e_A_Z-- ----- 66 ,1 ' , )79 ccjii - -,J * ( ) /{ r j i I ��de J eLo -cr- /- 14ae7( c.), 9) / 4 aZ ;"1-1\ v ) 1 cY d G o w 1x / ,2 / '71 C _____.-----N Z.\ )02 ----77 //r--) ---- ..., 62_ c_ N ,,-, ,,,i1--d -- _______ ccr ,..._____ _ 6 c S , /� t‹- , ,...-- __, �c c ci 6}_) cam- e/z7z. \. _.„4,_ Sr �y, i" -- . _ ... cJ‹c„/ J/ ji WeeZIA , 62) • • - 1 ,/ (7 � rj (6•Y' 41,04) - 7 (/ ✓o r : ) tic � r cc cY 0 / y 1/( . "?'-' ---2 .1 ) 2_ v y° /- ' 7,e,,, 2---L-A_ cM 2 — / / .. . ,, . , ..,,„,±,..„ -- - t. '(- v _.. .),_,.,,,, ,, - . ,)/, .--,Li , 7, ,,6 ,,,. ,2 __ ) - , ______ c. , 0. /. ) , ,A /6 e___ (._, _____„ , c________7 ,...._..... ,:_....„ „... i"--- ,.... _z , iy6- d ,2_____ ,___ „....,._, , .2y d _ ,./ce ,._../ , ,. k 2 (--N__, 6„ ,,_______,---7 \ ((c. ,7 L:c. ____--i - , 1-41-.1'-' c'-- ----- -e___ c________ \ / a-t) 6 _,___ 7.------- \ „Alit i _ate z G7 � - el LC' / ' J--"O 0 Zi-s2- / (e________( \. ) , 1,4,4 \ c:) , /23:!),, ,,I / --, , ,ZL>. '9 i 4,-- _________ (O, cY-(9, A -L--.. 5'-'\ 9 ,A4-2->71 L,2 / -('' i , 6.2 ,----- ,,,,,i,....,/ Ltsre- /-/ici ,L-- E /(5' 0) / ____ ------ ___, _ \ / N ?--- ,_, -12_ fietr:r ; - ' A __ti- ,, :P) (72-7 _ e) A C;--- 9--' j ---- (— -- as .,,,_i__,J.F7 7 ,, .„0- ,...s., c„,8, ,___‘__ c c tr \ Cr'Q- L1 - , _ ______L______o----IL____- \, 12 r t --q (0 , _I / _______2-. c›Jf 0 a,,Ail,:/ 1------ ______7_ ____,� ' r ' -y-y) (_ r-, j_. ‘2__ -- - \ )\ j A - 4_,E , il___e-._._0 \\_ .,, "7- 1__ ____r_________00,57---- -- ---- --- „_. '- *.a 2 ' ' A p„,(,)L-1 , c_, ,.,2,i,i/c.._ fir --* '- ' 2 ' . °A,e' - , 6, \ h , /) -7D I 7 )'/ram }1. -(•1"-40 r,- _y /X I / 7D i - ' '/ g , 3-- 17 ---° - ____,,,n--,-) is --/-y— e....„0-7c-- , ( / / , ,,,___ . e___..3 ke ,---,- , ‘ v --.--- 1, /30.9 / -----. ,--,_..... L., E__, ---'- -;.- 6 -- 0-4 I , ,_,,,..„ 0_, , q., / c______, 'J e (2L 77'. --_ ,,,----- - -? .5" i-Go ram ,--6, • 2_1' \ //vP4- 7 S 4) 6) )-7\-‘2 4>� - - - c 7fi wit \ ) .�0 i oC J — cam � I Pow / 12 h ( 1-7 n / - /2 7 ( )/C /4- (2 ‘,/ N ) /2t P71 - ( - _ N e ) a4 Os- (77 gA_ o-; v V „ U „---•.._...---- 0,..2) ______----t, ____ _/--/A --- 741 ) - -----G --e - - --__ ---b )-, 0 ivi w E-67- -----,---=-7\ 7- )----7 / 9 7:- 3 ;-- 1 I l a 8C= c- j kl I '---- Y” 1 L.PC.- 7) - ),17 / if 2 62--- .---7 i - . _ / L-% LT- /7 Y G ., 6 / (% )'icC - j , _ i _fe 1%,, ---e N ‘ ._._ 4 I % "�-- 111 /. f 4' , IA , d ,4 Q.,) a. .f>/' 'J ' ,, _.6.01,2), _....40 ut ,;\ A., --,7-- .0 - A .__ - --6-- L \ ‘5,,--,-- rik ' i ?-1) (77 --/— - ------ A 0)-C C.x.)‘ in,M),3 0 --7--c9/ ' ZA-fr frrn.r ,? a ___,,,,7-6, , N i • :9 / - � �� C____ • 9. 2- - - _ 1 / \ c,' / 2 ------- - 2 :,e,,-.4 , / c(r- 7- ir ' ,„„),Q , ----k-----, ..___.0 / cL__4,./ Ci u 4 2 2 (6 —/ ) 6 J"--b I-00-t- A%6. --51 ' d 2 D d /3 / //___,_______, io) c-P I in '')-) ,_______e"--'( \, A-I v`--- -, .,--- ____to ,------ 7' 9' 7) - 1 , -- /41/9 \t, R- t___;.,i,,„71 / 0 10 1 11 Lv Z,1 0Q,1_114 ) ,64,1A G Z 49 cffy )41)4 \ Vf/ f 61,,,z_ - l -e-Q J _9 9 L \ 1 // -e_p ( , \ 0 (7- ) ( ) . _ y2_-- ----)---,---1 69 --7°/ /) a 4Z i 2 t,t ( 0 , - 7 7 ‹.--6-. - J , g. ___--- J-1,0 i 17A-01 ' .2 ) G •a71) o 9 — t-12 / !) 4LtLe cbru'IL€2 /,27-. u Lj/ 27/ 4h \ • 6 4/6 \ c2/ - e 7-7 0 J A . / //2- _brj ) 11-- -- / 4 9 / -V -litAi( 91 7 / / .L /1-14 ) ) /9 cac;, o) 6- 2- _____6 plef- )1v Jd_pzyuy ,� � ) c A 7 el _s df) I N ,o ) - 22 .� lip l '7* ) • tt-- 271 E./4=z, leAe -- o 9 �� d 2-- /4_9 0110kiw - / r 'gerc</'2 ) -±74 -,;//f,.-e4k64 5:25 -,......„,.. _i„ Mof- 7-/6 /2 • Af \ \ .- --- iC ' -- ---.- --- (\ 1410 zoe ff p-- Zerf/ 6) /- f- - \ • 2_____ --- ---v ."--- - - 7 e"--3 ) \ "--' "9----- --ji ,I v 0 _Atari jari.--- ' - - -_ -...r. ,,,'"- e7r r-) .4 ,E;d64. 44Z,/ c „--- _____(-- H 4, •"".__ ___e___,„„),,,,, 1( / L.....--(...7/ \ af . ../ .,..2.-7,,,;-, 1V;‘ ,---- 4-4.0 6 c)fiiik. _..1-e,„.....„------, , 5'52 0 ,____,, i// z,,, A_ ------&,,P ,--- -- , 0 ,.:-.-? Z o' c,„,)- _- --6:,-/__'„ .......---5 z3 _ ___ .,-:-..-,,0 sue, L 7 Zt__,..,. xv4...71 6----( , . , z-/- t::, _ _ __ ___„- -: . .......„,7„ 7 . _ ____ / V (-- _ c.,,, / rg 4,17L- - _---4„„0-7, F � / f, -------_,, (j__AL___ 4/ - i °2;/ (32( f, �>d‘„,_ Cr c2 1a / i '") 7V ,s ' \ 2 -r191 6,7' -,.___, c._ , lk., _iy- S(1 \ ' ( 4 _4d \ - ----=--( / 9 P 4 \ /z7z. Dia--e . 2 (2, _y 2___ iL„, di . - C,-,0 Or i L J-q-,c) i r- 5 c1 - -4/)-, - —?-; 9- 72----"\ 2 C-D04.) P- /- i ,),G L_,__„___ )/' f' . e.-- 1 -,,, ,, -4, , _<., .,._ ._ _ ) ,__ . 6, 0 0 ,--7 /A1 - , _ 60,- /L--1) ,\,..cif .--- _ .,___ , i. ,_ )/c . ,y(,_, //_)_ c____ f -`--A ---17--- t �� y c i ii ,. , 2 / ;,- (------ I/D 7)C -*-- 1 ---) - -/- 6/ � 1 r I J ! ' Y Ylr-) Allid.D / 22/1' c, 7 ulL 7-c> c/1 ( o b 1i 9 7.2 0-C (3- 1 - a .�#`1E ma c % 4H 110 La"z_. 1-7,11/ I 61-- L 0 I - '- --.--- f I - --7 -6- 7‘8 2 _. ,, e r..". :)#..r ././2-l\ . - - , Lit:Jo , .AI - ._,,_) — . ' / e--( ,, / i a 6,- 9 , ._/- / \ ] ol%)/i ____ o12 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: MARCH 15, 2006 AGENDA NO.: III. A. AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF A CITY-INITIATED AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTIONS 2.4.6(E), SECTION 4.6.19 AND APPENDIX A (DEFINITIONS), RELATING TO DESIGNATION AND PROTECTION OF "HISTORIC TREES". ITEM BEFORE.THE BOARD The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission regarding a City-initiated amendment to the Land Development Regulations to address the designation and protection of"Historic Trees" throughout the City. Pursuant to Section 1.1.6, an amendment to the text of the Land Development Regulations may not be made until a recommendation is obtained from the Planning and Zoning Board. Since this amendment involves an action by the Historic Preservation Board, a recommendation from the Historic Preservation Board to the Planning and Zoning Board is being solicited. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This amendment is a City initiated LDR change that is in response to recent concerns with the removal of substantial trees during new development and redevelopment. The proposed modifications to LDR Section 2.4.6 (E) will add language that will make it unlawful to remove any tree that is four inches or more in diameter (4/12 feet above the ground) in any zone district or on any property with a single family use without a tree removal permit. Currently, this requirement only applies to multifamily and non-residential development. The amendment will also allow the City Horticulturist to recommend the designation of certain trees as historic. This would give additional protection during the construction process including a prohibition on placing materials i.e. fill, building materials or machinery within six feet of the tree and would require appropriate protective barriers to be erected. Any recommendation for "Historic Tree" designation would require a review and recommendation by the Historic Preservation Board before the matter is presented to City Commission for approval. I I LA. Historic Preservation Board Memorandum Staff Report, March 15, 2006 Amendment to LDRs Pertaining to Historic Trees Page 2 REQUIRED FINDINGS LDR Section 2.4.5(M)(5) (Findings): Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(M)(5) (Findings), in addition to LDR Section 1.1.6(A), the City Commission must make a finding that the text amendment is consistent with and furthers the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable Objective and Policies were noted: Conservation Element Objective B-2 Programs of education and regulation shall be implemented to increase public awareness and provide for the protection of flora and fauna. Regulatory measures shall ensure the protection, preservation, conservation, and appropriate use and protection of fisheries, wildlife and marine habitats which serve as habitat for endangered and threatened plant and animal species. Conservation Element Policy B-2.2 Whenever and wherever significant or sensitive flora and fauna communities are identified, plans shall be required to preserve the habitat to the extent feasible, or provide for mitigation if preservation is infeasible or inappropriate. Conservation Element Policy B-2.3 A tree permit shall be necessary to remove or destroy any tree which has a diameter of four inches or greater. All of these referenced components of the Conservation element center around the protection of vegetative communities including specimen trees. This amendment will promote the identification of significant and important flora resources and provide some oversight and additional protection. Given this, the LDR amendment furthers this objective and these policies. Therefore, based on the above, a positive finding can be made that the amendment is consistent with and furthers the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive. REVIEW BY OTHERS Courtesy Notices: Courtesy notices were provided to the following homeowner and civic associations: • Progressive Residents of Delray (PROD) • President's Council Letters of objection and support, if any, will be provided at the Historic Preservation Board meeting. • Historic Preservation Board Memorandum Staff Report, March 15,2006 Amendment to LDRs Pertaining to Historic Trees Page 3 ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The purpose of this City-initiated LDR text amendment is to enhance the protection of substantial flora within the City limits. The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION Move to recommend to the Planning and Zoning Board approval of the City-initiated amendments to LDR Section 2.4.6 (E), Section 4.6.19 and Appendix A (Definitions), relating to the designation and protection of"Historic Trees", by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.5(M) of the Land Development Regulations. Attachments: • Proposed Ordinance • DRAFT— rev.3-1-06 ORDINANCE NO. -06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING APPENDIX "A" TO PROVIDE A DEFINITION FOR "HISTORIC TREE"; BY AMENDING CHAPTER TWO, "ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS", SECTION 2.4.6(E), "TREE REMOVAL PERMIT" IN ORDER TO INCLUDE HISTORIC TREES AMONG THOSE THAT ARE UNLAWFUL TO REMOVE AND TO CLARIFY THAT A PERMIT FOR REMOVAL IS REQUIRED FOR ALL ZONING DISTRICTS INCLUDING SINGLE FAMILY AND TO REQUIRE THAT APPROVED SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN OF RECORD BE SUBMITTED WHERE APPLICABLE SHOWING THE LOCATION OF TREES IN RELATION TO ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDING CHAPTER FOUR, "ZONING REGULATIONS", SECTION 4.6.19, "TREE PROTECTION", IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR THE DESIGNATION AND PROTECTION OF HISTORIC TREES; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, has the authority to protect the public health, safety and welfare of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, has determined it to be in the public's best interest to establish regulations to provide for the protection of historic trees; and WHEREAS, the regulation of aesthetics has long been recognized as advancing the public welfare. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Appendix "A" of the Land Development Regulations be, and the same is hereby amended to read: HISTORIC TREE: A tree that has been identified by a Developer on a site/landscape plan that has special significance because it has achieved at least fifty percent (50%) of the points of the champion of the species for each respective type of tree as referenced on the American Forests website, "National Register of Big Trees". Total Points shall be measured by adding the trunk circumference (inches) + height (feet) + % average cro` spread (feet). Section 2. That Section 2.4.6(E), "Tree Removal Permit, shall be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: (E) Tree Removal Permit: (1) Rule: It shall be unlawful for any person, without first obtaining a permit, to remove or cause to be removed or effectively remove through damaging any tree in any zoning district and on property with single family uses with a diameter of four inches or more, the diameter being measured 4 — 1/2 feet above the ground and/or any historic tree. Further, it shall be unlawful for any licensed tree surgeon or service company or general contractor to remove any tree covered by these provisions without a permit. Upon the third violation of the terms and provisions of this Section by such person or firm, the City Commission may, after investigation by the Chief Building Official revoke or suspend the City occupational license of such person or firm. (2) Required Information: An application form, and attendant fee, shall be completed and delivered to the Chief Building Official, or his designee. The application form shall be as promulgated by the Chief Building Official. In addition, the following must be provided: (a) Location of proposed driveways and other planned areas or structures on the site; (b) The location of all trees subject to permit with identification as to type, trunk diameter, height, and species; (c) Designation of all diseased trees and any trees endangering any roadway, pavement, and/or utility lines; (d) Designation of any trees proposed to be removed from the site, relocated on the site, and retained in their present location; and (e) Any proposed grade changes which might adversely affect or endanger any trees on the site with specification as to how to maintain such endangered trees; and (f) A copy of the approved site plan/landscape plan of record, where one was required, showing approved new development and/or re- development in relation to all existing historic trees and/or trees on the site with a four inch (4") or greater trunk diameter measured four and one half (4 " ) feet above grade. 2 ORD. NO. Section 3. That Chapter Four, "Zoning Regulations", Section 4.6.19, "Tree Protection", be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 4.6.19. TREE PROTECTION. (A) Rule: Protection from Construction: It shall be unlawful for any person in the construction of any structures or other improvements to place material, machinery or temporary soil deposits within six feet of any historic tree and/or any tree having a four inch (4") or greater trunk diameter measured four and one-half feet (4 %2') above grade. {B) (1) Method: During construction, a builder shall be required to erect suitable protective barriers around all trees which are to be preserved. Also, during construction, no attachments or wires other than protective guy wires shall be attached to any tree. (C) (2) Exceptions: Specifically exempt from this Section 4.6.19(A)(11 are trees and shrub vegetation on the property of single family homes, on the property of licensed tree nurseries, and on the easements of public utilities, and the following species of tree: {1) (a) Schinus Terebinthinfolius (Brazilian Pepper, Florida Holly) {2) (b) Metopium Toxiferum (Poison Wood) {3) (c) Melaleuca Leucadendron (Melaleuca) (B) Protection of Historic Trees: All development proposals shall protect existing trees on the site to the fullest extent possible and shall illustrate on the site/landscape plan all new development in relation to all existing historic trees and/or trees on the site with a four inch (4") or greater trunk diameter measured four and one half (4 '/2) feet above grade. Section 4. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, clause or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part hereof other than the part declared invalid. Section 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed. Section 6. That this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage on second and final reading. 3 ORD. NO. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the day of , 2006. ATTEST: City Clerk MAYOR First Reading Second Reading 4 ORD. NO. UELItAY BFACH - - DELRAY BEACH rgrn°Hirr HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD flu1; MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT liii 12UU7!i93 1993 2W7 MEETING OF: MARCH 15, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: 6-Month Moratorium of Demolitions, Additions, and New Construction in the City's Five Historic Districts. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board on a six-month moratorium ordinance regarding new development proposals located in the City's five historic districts. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Given recent concerns over the level and type of development affecting historic preservation efforts within all five (5) of the City's historic districts, on March 6, 2006, the City Commission supported the implementation of a six-month moratorium on any new development proposals including, but not limited to, demolitions, new construction, and additions where the addition exceeds 50% of the existing square footage. During this time, Staff will work with residents within the five (5) historic districts to establish an overlay district similar to that of the Beach Property Overlay Districts, which would place additional development regulations specific to each district, assuring that all new development respects the surrounding neighborhood character in terms of architectural style, scale, and massing. Possible solutions could include the establishment of a maximum lot coverage and floor area ratio, an increase in the minimum required open space, reductions of maximum heights, and/or application of additional setback requirements for all second-story elements. Current zoning districts located within the historic districts include R-1-A and R-1-AA (Single-Family Residential), RO (Residential Office), RL (Multi-Family Residential, Low Density), RM (Multi-Family Residential, Medium Density), CF (Community Facility), CBD (Commercial Business District), and OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). The attached chart shows existing regulations which apply to zoning district. The overlay guidelines could apply to one or more historic districts as deemed appropriate by City Staff, Advisory Boards, Residents, and Commission. RECOMMENDED ACTION Recommend approval of the moratorium ordinance to the Planning and Zoning Board establishing a six-month moratorium on any new development proposals including, but not limited to, demolitions, new construction, and additions for all five (5) of the City's historic districts. Attachment: Zoning Charts, City Manager Memorandum to City Commission, City Commission Document, Proposed Amendment. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MATRIX - RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (This matrix is to be interpreted and applied pursuant to Section 4.3.4) MINIMUM SETBACKS MINIMUM LOT LOT MINIMUM MAXIMUM OPEN SIDE SIDE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH LOT FRONTAGE FLOOR LOT SPACE FRONT STREET INTERIOR DEVELOPMENT SIZE I/C DEPTH I/C AREA COVERAGE REQUIRE- 18.2/3 1&2/3 1&213 REAR DENSITY HEIGHT(4) AREA (sq.ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (sq.ft.) MENT (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.1 Agriculture AG 10AC. (2) 100 110 100 1,500 35 25 15 25 35 Rural Residential RR 3 ACRES 2,200 17 12 12 35 Single Family R-1-AAA 12,500 100 110 100 2,200 35 17 12 12 35 R-1-AAAB 12,500 100 110 100 1,500 35 17 12 12 N/A 35 R-1-AA 9,500 75/95 100 ( 75/95 1,500 N/A 30 15 10 10 35 N/A R-1-AAB 9,000 90 100 , 90 1,500 25 20 81/2 25 35 R-1-A 7,500 60/80 100 60/80 1,000 25 15 7 12 10 35 R-1-AB 7,500 60/80 100 60/80 1,500 25 15 712 10 35 Low- RL(5) Medium Density Multi-family 8,000 60 100 60 (1) 40% (3) 25 25 15 25 3-6 35 Duplex 25 25 15 15 UNITS/ Zero Lot Line 4,800 80 25 25 15 25 ACRE (a Medium- RM(5) r Medium High Density Multi-family 8,000 60 100 60 (1) 40% 25/30(6) 25/30(6) 15/30(6) 25(6) 6-12 35 0) 4 Duplex 15 UNITS/ Zero Lot Line 4,800 80 25 ACRE Planned Residential PRD PER LAND Multifamily Component N/A N/A N/A N/A (1) 40% 25/30 25/30 15/25 25 USE MAP OR 35 5 ACRES Single Family Component Conventional 7,500 60/80 100 60/80 1,200 25 15 7 12 10 NUMERICAL 35 Zero Lot Line 4,500 40/60 80 40/60 1,000 , N/A 20 0/15 SUFFIX Mobile Home Park Park 2 ACRES 120 N/A N/A N/A 25 15 712 10 N/A 35 2 ACRES Sites 3,200 N/A 5 5 5 5 I/C =Interior Lot/Comer Lot Cl)182/3=1&2 Story Structure/3 Story Structure V/ m SUBNOTES: (1) =Minimum Floor Area for Duplexes and Multifamily Dwelling Units: (2) =See Section 4.4.1(F)for exceptions. Duplexes 1000 sq.ft* (3) =A minimum of 25%non-vehicular open space shall be provided. Interior .• 1 Efficiency 400 sq.ft. and perimeter landscaping may be applied toward meeting this requirement. O One Bedroom 600 sq,ft. (4) =See Paragraph 4.3.4(J)(2)for single family detached structures In residentially zoned districts. Two Bedroom 900 sq.ft. (5) =The provisions for the R-1-A District shall apply for single family dwellings. Z Three Bedroom 1250 sq.ft. (6) = Refer to individual district regulations"Development Standards'section for special setbacks in the Southwest Neighborhood Overlay District.[AIM.Ord.7-05 2/16/O5 Four Bedroom 1500 sq.ft. .p (Amd.Ord.42-97 10/7/97]; (Amd.Ord.16-93 2/9/971 •Represents absolute minimum size. Must also comply with minimums for corresponding number of bedrooms. .{� X r • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MATRIX - NONRESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (This matrix Is to be interpreted and applied pursuant to Section 4.3.4) MINIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM SETBACKS MINIMUM LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT FLOOR SIDE SIDE DEVELOPMENT SIZE WIDTH DEPTH FRONTAGE COVERAGE AREA PERIMETER FRONT STREET INTERIOR REAR HEIGHT AREA OTHER (sq.ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (sq.ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) General Commercial GC 0 0 0 0 (3) N/A N/A 10(5) 10(5) (2)(5) 10(5) 48 N/A [Amd.Ord.21-04 5/4/04] Automobile Commercial AC 10,000/(1) 50/(1) 100/(1) 50/(1) (3) N/A (1) 15(5) 15 (2) 10 48 (1) Refer to specialrequlrements for auto sales Neighborhood Commercial NC 1 ACRE 100 200 100 40%(3) 4,000 N/A 40 30 30 10(4) 48 1 ACRE Maximum site area oftwo(2)acres 1, Planned Commercial PC 10,000 50 100 50 (3) 6,000 N/A 10 10 0 10 48 N/A Refer toiedionoora(FH2) rerestrictions on fl Door area Central Business District CBD 0 0 0 0 (1) N/A N/A (1) (1) (1) (1) 48 N/A (Amd.Ord.21-04 5/4/04) Central Business District-CBD-RC 0 0 0 0 (1) N/A N/A (1) (1) (1) (1) 48 N/A (Amd.Ord.21-04 5/4/04) Rail Corridor Resort-Tourism RT 1 ACRE 100 100 100 60%(3) N/A 15 N/A N/A N/A N/A 48 N/A Planned Office Center POC 1 ACRE N/A N/A N/A 60%(3) 4,000 (1) 30 30 10 10 48 3 ACRES Professional/Office POD 0 0 0 0 40%(3) N/A N/A 25 25 0/(2) 10 48 N/A Residential Office RO 8,000 80 100 80 40%(3) N/A N/A 25 25 15 25 35 N/A Planned Commerce Center PCC See Section 4.4.18 48 10 ACRES Mixed Industrial/Commercial MIC 0 , 0 0 0 50%(3) N/A N/A 25 25 10 10 48 N/A W Industrial I 20,000 100 200 100 50%(3) N/A (1) 30 30 10 10 48 (1) r Light Industrial LI 20,000 0 0 100 50%(3) N/A N/A 10 10 5 10 48 1 ACRE al Refer to Section 4.424 for special O.S.S.Historic Arts OSSHAD 8,000 80 100 80 40%(3) (1) N/A 25(1) 15(1) 7 1/2(1) 10(1) 35 N/A areas and additional regulations [Amd.Ord.59-04 11 116/04] Communityditional Facilities CF 0 0 0 0 (3) N/A 10 N/A N/A N/A N/A 48 N/A 0.1.r to Section Sr.dnente setback knee n4utramem. Open Space OS See Section 4.4.22 Open Space and Recreation OSR See Section 4,4.27 Conservation CD See Section 4.4.23 Special Activities District SAD 0 0 0 0 (1)(3) N/A 15 (1) (1) (1) (1) 48 (1) NOTES: (1) = Refer to individual district regulations. Cn (2) =When there is no dedicated access to the rear of any structure a 10'side yard setback shall be provided. m^ (3) = In addition to lot coverage restrictions,a minimum of 25%non-vehicular open space shall be provided. Interior and perimeter landscaping may be applied toward meeting this requirement. ' 1 (4) = Minimum rear yard setback Is ten feet(10')and then one additional foot for each foot in building height above ten feet(10'). O (5) = Refer to individual district regulations"Development Standards"section for special setbacks in the North Federal Corridor.[Amd.Ord.64-04 11/16104] Z W 411. City of Delray Beach e mo To: City Commission From: City Manager CC: Date: March 3,2006 Re: Historic Districts I have become alarmed that we are in danger of having our historic districts destroyed by mansionization. On Wednesday the Historic Preservation Board approved the partial demolition of an 1,100 square foot house in the Del Ida Park historic district at 711 N. Swinton, and construction of an "addition"which will result in a total square footage for this house of 4,275. At 527 N. Swinton, facing much opposition from neighbors, the Board delayed a decision on a request to demolish a contributing structure and replace it with a new house with detached garage and guest house totaling 4,600 square feet. On March 15,the Historic Preservation Board will consider a request to build three houses on the property on the west side of Seacrest between NE 6th Street and NE 7th Street with square footages of 5,246, 5,452 and 5,009. The house formerly on these properties has already been demolished. There is a fourth lot for which plans have not yet been submitted. If six houses of this size are approved, I believe it will lead to the essential destruction of the Del Ida Park Historic District. The historic rhythm and ambiance of the district, the historic character of the buildings and the open space patterns around each house will all be lost. The historic homes will be swallowed up and overwhelmed by the new mega houses being built in the district. While the City Attorney and I believe that our current code gives sufficient basis for denying permits for these homes as being incompatible with the historic district due to their size and mass,the Historic Preservation Board is of the opinion that they do not have such power,and have requested specific guidelines further limiting Floor Area Ratio, Lot coverage, building height and required green space. Therefore, I strongly recommend that the Commission direct the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider a moratorium on any further demolitions and large scale construction in all our historic districts for six months to allow staff to work with the residents of these districts and develop further appropriate limitations on development in these districts to protect their essential historic character. 1 CITY COMM1SSION'_DOCUMENTATION TO: DA T. £ ' DE• , CITY MANAGER THROUGH: PAUL DORLINGu RECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING FROM: AMY E. ALVAREZ, HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNE SUBJECT: MEETING OF MARCH 6, 2006 REQUEST TO CONSIDER A SIX-MONTH MORATORIUM OF NEW DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS LOCATED PARTICULARLY IN THE DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT AND/OR ALL OTHER HISTORIC DISTRICTS. Given recent concerns over the level and type of development affecting historic preservation efforts within all five (5) of the City's historic districts, but more particularly the Del-Ida Park Historic District, it has been suggested that the City Commission consider a six-month moratorium of any new development proposals including, but not limited to, demolitions, new construction, and additions. During this time, Staff will work with the residents of the Del-Ida Park Historic District as well as the four other districts to establish an overlay district similar to that of the Beach Property Overlay Districts, which would place additional development regulations specific to each district, assuring that all new development respects the surrounding neighborhood character in terms of architectural style, scale, and massing. Possible solutions could include the establishment of a maximum lot coverage and floor area ratio, an increase in the minimum required open space, and application of additional setback requirements for all second-story elements. Current zoning districts located within the Del-Ida Park Historic District include R-1-AA (Single-Family Residential), RO (Residential Office), and RL (Multi-Family Residential, Low Density), all of which have a building height limit of thirty-five feet (35') and a minimum open space requirement of twenty-five percent (25%). The R-1-AA zoning district requires a minimum lot size of 9,500 square feet and a minimum floor area of 1,200 square feet, while the RO and RL zoning districts require a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet with a maximum lot coverage of forty percent (40%). Zoning designations in the other historic districts include R-1-A and R-1-AA (Single-Family Residential), RM (Multi-Family Residential, Medium Density), CF (Community Facility), CBD (Commercial Business District), and OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). The overlay guidelines could apply to one or more historic districts as deemed appropriate by City Staff, Advisory Boards, Residents, and Commission. If the Commission supports this initiative, an ordinance must be prepared, advertised, and considered by the Historic Preservation Board and Planning and Zoning Board and approved by City Commission. RECOMMENDED ACTION Recommend processing an ordinance to establish a six-mouth moratorium on any new development proposals including, but not limited to, demolitions, new construction, and additions for all five (5) of the City's historic districts. Or oil nc.-e- \32* e'Pl; 14ct ORDINANCE NO. 14-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY BUILDING MORATORIUM FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL LOCATED IN ANY OF THE CITY'S FIVE HISTORIC DISTRICTS AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN FOR A PERIOD OF SIX (6) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR GEOGRAPHIC AREA COVERED; PROVIDING FOR THE DURATION OF MORATORIUM; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined that the City's historic districts need further protection and wishes to enact a six month moratorium on any demolition an. .I construction of new structures or additions, where the addition exceeds 50% of the sq III footage of the existing structure; and WHEREAS, the City needs a period of time in which City staff may work with the residents of these districts in order to draft appropriate overlay guidelines to assure that future development respects the surrounding neighborhood character in terms of architectural style, scale and massing; and WHEREAS, this zoning ordinance is adopted pursuant to the City's Home Rule Powers as set forth in Florida Statutes Chapter 166; and WHEREAS, this ordinance is enacted in compliance with Florida Statutes Section 166.041(3)(c); and, WHEREAS, pursuant to LDR Section 1.1.6, the Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the proposed text amendment at a public hearing held on , and voted to to recommend that the changes be approved; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 163.3174(4)(c), the Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, has determined that the change is consistent with and furthers the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach adopts the findings in the Planning and Zoning Staff Report; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach finds the ordinance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA: Section 1. TEMPORARY BUILDING MORATORIUM. All activities relating to the acceptance, review and action upon permit applications for the demolition and/or construction of new structures or additions, where the addition exceeds 50% of the square footage of the existing structure, are temporarily suspended in order for the City of Delray Beach, through its officials and staff, to have adequate time and opportunity to develop additional development regulations specific to each district in order to provide that future development would respect the surrounding neighborhood character in terms of architectural style, scale and massing. Based upon the foregoing,there is hereby imposed a temporary moratorium on the acceptance, review and action upon permit applications for the demolition and/or construction of new structures or additions, where the addition exceeds 50% of the square footage of the existing structure, located in any of the City's five historic districts. During the time the temporary moratorium is in effect, the City v accept no applications for permits for the demolition and/or construction of new structure. and additions located in the historic districts. Section 2. GEOGRAPHIC AREA COVERED. A temporary moratorium established in this ordinance shall be effective in the five historic districts of the City of Delray Beach, which are the Nassau Street District, Marina District, Del-Ida Park, Old School Square and West Settlers District, as described in Section 4.5.1(L) of the LDR's. Section 3. DURATION OF MORATORIUM. The temporary moratorium set forth in this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon the effective date of this ordinance and shall terminate six (6) months after the said effective date. The City will accept no applications which are subject to the moratorium until the moratorium has expired. Section 4. PENALTIES. Any individual, entity or agent, who shall violate any provision of this ordinance or who fails to comply therewith, or with any of the requirements thereof, shall be fined in an amount not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500.00) or be imprisoned for a period of not exceeding sixty (60) days. Section 5. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. 2 ORD. NO. 14-06 Section 6. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed. Section 7. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage on second and final reading. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this day of , 2006. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK First Reading Second Reading • 3 ORD. NO. 14-06 U[ERAY B[ACH DE11tAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 1111, MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT �II�� 1993 1993 2001 2001 • Agent: Andrew Spengler Property Owner: Coastal Property Holdings, LLC Property Address: 116 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District (Formerly 107 NE 6th Street) HPB Meeting Date: March 15, 2006 COA: 2005-383 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a new two-story residence and landscape plan located at 116 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 2, Block 2, North Del-Ida Estates Replat, zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). The property, located in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, previously contained a contributing one-story, single-family dwelling and detached, single-car garage. During its meeting of August 3, 2005, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and recommended approval for the demolition of the existing structures based on the fact that they appeared to have very little architectural or historical merit. The subject property was previously a part of six (6) non-conforming lots which have since been reconfigured and replatted into four (4) conforming lots. The subject lots measures at a width of ninety-five feet (95') and a depth of one-hundred, twenty-one feet (121'). The Staff report for the replat, which was reviewed at the HPB meeting of June 15, 2005, stressed that the layout and design of the four (4) proposed single family homes `....will be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area.' In September 2005, the applicant submitted the first proposals for two of the four properties (Lot 1 and the subject property, Lot 2). The applications then went through Staffs review process, at which time comments were generated directing the applicant to revise the proposals. The applicant met with Staff in October 2005 to review the submittals. Revised plans were subsequently presented and reviewed at the Board's meeting of December 7, 2005. Upon review of the two-story, single-family dwelling, the HPB directed the applicant to revise the proposal based on the following comments: 1) Scale and massing are too large, particularly for proposed location; 2) Overall height should be brought down; 3) East elevation should be broken up; too massive; 4) Revised landscape plan should be submitted; 5) Overall architectural style of proposal should fit in with existing historic styles of Del-Ida Park Historic District; "6 hi . . Strect C0A 2005-383 HP Meet na March "5,2006 6) Proposed style not defined by the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Guidelines. The applicant then revised the submittal which was reviewed by the Board for a second time on January 18, 2006. At this meeting, the Board continued the application for a second time stressing the need to further reduce the scale and mass. The Board's direction to the applicant included the following comments: 1) That the overall scale and mass be further reduced, as applicant should work with Staff regarding scale and mass; 2) That the roof pitch may be reduced to 4/12 to reduce the overall height and lessen the impact of the large scale and mass on the surrounding properties; 3) That the garage be further set back from the front wall plane on the north elevation, and; 4) That the fence posts be reduced to five feet (5') in height. While the applicant was encouraged to work with Staff on resolving the issue of scale and mass, the applicant did not follow that direction and has submitted a completely new design for the subject property, which is now before the Board for review. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of the construction of a two-story, single-family residence containing 5,247 total square feet, approximately 4,123 square feet of which is under a/c. While within the required zoning setbacks (10'-side interior and rear, 15'-side-street, and 30'-front), the structure maximizes this allowance by expanding to each setback on all four sides. The building foot print calculates to approximately thirty five percent (35%) of the property. The style takes inspiration from the Mediterranean Revival/Spanish Eclectic style. The concrete block dwelling is proposed to be clad in stucco and finished off with a Spanish "S" tile roof at a 4/12 pitch. Decorative cast stone columns and trim are proposed throughout as are wood outriggers and fascia. The overall fenestration consists of impact-resistant, aluminum framed windows of a variety of sizes, shapes, and styles which, according to the window schedule, include fixed and single-hung, some of which are arched at the top and others that are a simple, fixed, circular porthole type opening. Many windows contain awnings, as well. The main (North) elevation, which faces NE 7th Street, contains a central, two-story element measuring forty-eight feet (48') in width, with a one-story, two-car garage to the west, measuring twenty-two feet (22') in width, for a total front elevation width of seventy-feet (70'). The main entry, which contains a one-story entry portico supported by cast-stone columns topped with an inspired Greek Corinthian Capital, contains a large, arched, custom, wood double door. To the east of the entry is a large, rounded stair tower containing stepped arches with fixed windows. The wall-plane, which juts out to the west of the entry, contains three arched windows, approximately eight feet (8') in height on the first floor, and a set of French doors with a small balcony on the second floor. The one-story, two-car garage, measures approximately fifteen feet (15') in height and contains two, metal arched doors. The elevation (east) facing NE 2nd Avenue also contains the large, two-story element which faces NE 7th Street and contains the stair-tower, as well as a long, one-story element. On this elevation, the two-story portion measures approximately forty-feet, six inches (40'6") in depth, while the one-story portion measures approximately thirty-nine feet (39') in depth. The rear (South) elevation, which has a high level of visibility from NE 2nd Avenue, primarily consists of the one-story elements. The two-story element has an overall measurement of forty- 116 NE 7'`Street.COA 2005-333 • HPB Meet ng March 15,2006 eight feet (48'), of which twelve feet, six inches (12'6") is recessed towards the north. The first story contains a covered porch area supported by columns similar to those at the front entry. The side interior(west) elevation gives the profiles of the three, two-story masses, as well as the one-story mass located on the west. A four foot (4') tall stucco wall extends from the structure to the property lines on the east and west. A fence, located along the east, south, and west property lines is noted on the landscape plan along with a fair amount of landscaping throughout the property. A brick driveway is proposed leading from NE 7t' Street with a walkway of the same material connecting to the front door. A swimming pool and accompanying deck is proposed at the rear of the property. PROJECT ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Objective A-12.1, of the Comprehensive Plan, offers that to assist the residents of the City in maintaining and enhancing their neighborhood environment, the City shall take steps to ensure that modifications in and around the neighborhood do not lead to its decline, such as those described in the following policies. • Policy A-12.4 The City will provide planning and technical assistance to implement neighborhood-supported initiatives aimed at preserving the character of existing residential areas. Such assistance may involve the formulation of regulations that would limit size and scale of new homes to be consistent with the existing structures within a defined neighborhood, and analysis of the housing inventory to determine if the area qualifies for designation as a historic district, and similar measures. Design Elements LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7) and (E)(8)(a-k), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The Board shall consider the following: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, -relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non- contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance of any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of height, front façade proportion, proportion of openings (windows and doors), rhythm of solids to voids on ;7 116 NE 7 Street,COA,2005-363 HPB Meeting March 15,2006 E . front facades, rhythm of buildings on streets, rhythm of entrance. and/or porch projections, relationship of materials, texture and color, roof shapes, walls of continuity, scale of building, directional expression of front elevation. The following criteria have not been met: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. The height of the building as submitted varies between fifteen feet, six inches (15'6") to the ridgeline of the one-story elements and twenty-nine feet, six inches (29'6") to the ridgeline of the two-story elements. Overall, the height is within the maximum allowed (35') in terms of zoning regulations; however, it is not appropriate within the context of the historic district in which it is located. Its inappropriateness lends to the very prominent and large, two- story mass, particularly on the north (front) and east (street-side) elevations where the rounded stair tower is located and the two-story elements are not stepped back, providing full, two-story wall planes. (b) Front Facade Proportion: The front facade of each building or structure shall be visually compatible with and in direct relationship to the width of the building and to the height of the front elevation of other adjacent or adjoining buildings within a historic district. The front facade proportions of the proposal have no compatible relation to the adjacent buildings within the historic district. The front façade is essentially, a forty- seven foot wide (47'), two story mass with a twenty-two foot wide (22') one story element to the west. The two-story mass includes a large, rounded stair-tower at the corner adding to the massive appearance. (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. Del-Ida Park Historic District is an area made up of simple homes with minimal scale and mass. The proposed compatibility regarding windows and doors is not consistent with the existing/historic patterns. (d) Rhythm of Solids to Voids; Front Facades: The relationship of solids to voids in the front facade of a building or structure will be visually compatible with the front facades of historic buildings or structures within the district. The amount of solid proposed is not compatible with that of the existing structures in the historic district. (e) Rhythm of Buildings on Streets: The relationship of buildings to open space between them and adjoining buildings shall be visually compatible with the relationship between historic sites, buildings, or structures within a historic district. The streetscape rhythm in this area is low-scale. The second-story elements would need to be further revised in order to mitigate their impact in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. This would include incorporating second-story elements into a predominately one-story structure should the applicant not find a compatible solution that is entirely one-story. Additionally, the location of the proposed structure is rather visible from many vantage points; therefore further consideration should be given to the impact on its surroundings. (f) Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Projections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with the prevalent architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The rhythm of entrances in the Del-Ida Park Historic District does not include such high visibility of garage elements/structures. t 6 NE.-re^Street,COA 2005-383 HPB Mee ng March lb,2006 • The dwelling is set-back approximately thirty feet (30') from the front property line, and fifteen feet (15') from the street side property line. As proposed, the garage sits back only three feet,six inches (3'6")from the front wall plane. The two-car garage should be a less prominent feature and eliminated from the front facade. Q) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. In order for new construction to be compatible in any existing neighborhood, the existing structures must at least be considered in terms of style, size, scale, and mass, the importance of which expands when speaking in the context of a historic district. When reviewing the subject application, it is not evident that this has occurred. The proposal has not taken the historic district into consideration. (k) Directional Expression of Front Elevation: A building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures, and sites in its directional character, whether vertical, horizontal, or nondirectional. While the directional expression of the front elevation is apparent, its grand scale is unnecessary for and not visually compatible with the Del- Ida Park Historic District The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that: oNew additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (Standard#9) oNew additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. (Standard# 10) The intent of Standards 9 and 10 have not been taken into consideration and are essential in creating a compatible environment in the historic districts. Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines o For buildings where additional height is allowed, stepping back the upper stories may help to-- minimize the difference as viewed from the street. oAll infill must be compatible with the surrounding buildings and yet must be differentiated from the historic building stock. o The height of any new building should be similar to those of other buildings along the streetscape. o The new construction should be compatible with the width of the surrounding buildings. o The relationship of new construction adjacent to significant historic resources can either enhance or detract from the historic setting of the district. o The character of the massing should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. oRoof forms and pitch should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. 116 NE 7"Street.COA 2005-383 HPS Meeting March 15,2006 The above noted guidelines have been pointed out because their intent has not been met or taken into consideration. A look at the historical patterns within the Del-Ida Park Historic District might give more insight on complying with the above noted guidelines in the context of the subject district. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION While the proposed two-story, Mediterranean Revival residence is a beautiful design, it does not belong in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. Del-Ida Park was one of Delray's earliest planned communities and, in 1988, was one of the City's first designated historic districts. It is predominantly made up of one-story structures possessing a minimal size, scale, and mass. The location of the proposed two-story dwelling is rather prominent in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. It sits on the corner of NE 7th Street and NE 2"d Avenue, a main residential road connecting to the Pineapple Grove Main Street area and onto Atlantic Avenue. NE 2"d Avenue is commonly an option for those who do not wish to travel along Swinton Avenue, where there is heavier traffic. Additionally, Palm Court, a road diagonally connecting George Bush Boulevard to NE 2nd Avenue, ends at this very location, adding to the location's visibility. However, it must be noted that even if the subject property were in a less prominent location within the Del-Ida Park Historic District, this would not lessen the overall incompatibility and negative impact of its size, scale, and mass. Furthermore, it must be reiterated that the property consisted of six (6) non-conforming lots which have been reconfigured and replatted into four (4) conforming lots. The Staff report for the replat stressed that the layout and design of the four (4) proposed single family homes `....will be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area.' This requirement has not been satisfied. The applicant has submitted a total of four (4) proposals for review, none of which have adhered to the City's LDRs, historic preservation guidelines or the existing context of the historic district which should always be considered for new development proposals. Therefore, based on the analysis above and throughout the staff report, positive findings cannot be made with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for a new dwelling at 116 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness for a new dwelling at 116 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 116 NE i'Street.CQA 20335- 63 HPB Meeting March 15,2006 RECOMMENDATION Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness for 116 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based upon a failure to make findings with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Report Prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: Proposed Elevations, Site Plan, Survey, & Floor Plan - Architecture by I HDA a I Hunter Design Associates,Inc. LOT 3 sine 37*63"W 3601 N Dixie Hwy s -------------------------- Boca It _—_—_— FEN CE _—_—_—_—_—_ Boca Raton.Florida33432 ' LOT 2 i --Q. Telephone(561)394-6745 1 b YARD Fax(561)750.4074 POOL I E-mail: huntdesalbelsouthnet _ 1 II 10.00'SET BACK--------- DECK --_ r--- ,a. In Association with I COPE r Ll Cope ArdlUects,Inc111 �L 80 N.E.4th Avenue I ;1 \`\\ w I Delray Beads.Florida 33483 j' \`•`a N Telephone (581)274-6706 c i Fax(561)274-6707 ;; SWIMco OUT{I 1E-0" ii . I Q I 1 m 1; I ____ I SITE COVERAGE : �1 a i I Iis .sns LOT SIZE 120.05'x 85.00: 11400 SQ.Fr. etD ff I BUILGING AREA COVERAGE:3978.E Q. 1 YARD " ;: a J I BRICK DRIVE AND WALK AREAS:1349 SQ.FT. Z POOL AREA 548.3 SQ.FT. , ^d r W I POOL DECK AREA:562.4 SQ.FT. LLIi; POOL EQUIP. ;1 SQUARE FOOTAGE: of I CO 1 ; 1 1ST.FLOOR NC:2878.3 SIFT. Z I• PROPOSED TWO I , TND. FLOOR wc Ra zc2 SQ.FT.Q Constructed by I STORY RESIDENCE ( o GARAGE:528.4 SQ.FT.I 4 0,_0, l O 1ST.FLOOR PORCHES:440.2 SQ.FT. Spengler • iW I a Q D D I z 1ST.FLOOR PORTICO:133 SO.FT. 2ND.FLOOR BALCONY:22.3 SQ.FT. Construction > TOTAL UNDER ROOF:5248.4 SQFT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE AS PER CH.601 F.B.C.2005 EDT. �+ Q 3 I a r OCCUPANCY:SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE GROUP R - I n c. ` 0 0 1-L-' I I 382 N.E.3rd Ave. Z a 1 GATES -� AIC COMA i Decay Beads,FL w I Di LEGAL DESCRIPTION : 33444 1 STUCCO ONZI BLOCK WALL I A c coMwyzNORTH DEL-IDA ESTATES I 1 ,\.-1 - I1 FPLMEIEWDISC. BEINGAREPLATOFLOTS,ITHR000H16.INCLUSIVE, TI BLOCK 3,DEL-IDA PARK(PLAT BOOK 9,PAGE 52, raihh..V, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,FLORIDA), 1 GATE.?I BEING IN SECTION 9,TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH,RANGE 43 FAST,CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,PALM BEACH COUNTY, • I I I 1 FLORIDA. 1 1 �- — -- Q _ -__ -------__--- UNDERGROUND Project : • 3D.00'SET BACK III INDERGROUND WATER SITE LOCATION : Lot 2 I BRICK WALKWAY BRICK I VERIFY North Del-Ida Estates i MOTOR i i Delray Beach,Fl. COURT , 1 II 1 \ YARD \ I N//■ \ 1 1 �\ I 7N STREET `�� —i j • S 88°38'13"W , Dale Revision/Issue EXIST.SIDE WALK 12.8.05 Revised NE 7TH STREET Designed S.L.R.C. Drawn S.L A.S. 1 Checked S.L. R.C. Approved Project No. TI LOT 2 - Scale =,'D N Date 12-21-05 � —k SSITE PLAN Drawing \_/ SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" A-1 Architecture by HDA W Inc.Hunter Design Associates, 01 ey s WINDOW SCHEDULE FIRST FLOOR W Suite ll Dixie Hwy 'Il CO Teelephone Raton,Florida 384 8745 WINDOW FRAME �` Fax(581)750-4074 NO. LOC. NOTES 8 11 E-mail: huntdes©bellsouthnet SIZE ' - TYPE MATt MATT sRowER POOL W H swwith A PERIMETER 30' 0e FIXED ALUM& AWMN P.G.T.ARCH TOP In Association e PERIMETER 37 0- SH ALDMN ALUMN P.O.T.ARCH TOP COPE C PERIMETER 30' 46' SH AWMN. AW �/MN. P.G.T. CLOSET Cope Architects,Inc D PERIMETER 30' 60' 6H AWN AWF UL — W 80N.E.4ihAvenue NHE 30' 3P FIXEDALUM ALUMN P.GTROUND 36' WMALUM.ALUM.60' 6M AN A P.G.T. COW =BATHROOM W• Fax(561)274-8707 _ ( ) SWIM OUT NOTE:WRHE FRAMES. �/ IJ D ey DOOR SCHEDULE FIRST FLOOR • C `"� DOOR FRAME rwo rAi !Fa ram LJ L'+J EL& DA FL EL NO. LOC. SIZE HOW SET (MIEN) NOTES (^ v)MATL MATL TYPE DETAIL r W HT `] 100 PORTICO NT5.O Bd WO WD S.C. CUSTOM WOOD = PORCH 101 GARAGE r.0 BA MR. DH ' M MR. FLUSH INSULATEDWAPP!.EDTRIM 102 SIDE GARAGE 3'-0 a-0' MIL MIL RNSEPTA INSULATED v = — 10 �� Constructed by 103 KITCHEN (T)710' 8-0' ALUM ALUM. FRENCH PG7 W/SIDE LT.38- U U U ° U I Spengler 104 GREAT ROOM R13'-P 8'A' ALUM AWM. FRENCH PGT - G G G r� 10 C �, 105 MASTER SURE (2)7.6 8d' ALUM ALUM. FRENCH PGT MASTER .9I ICE} 1 " II i 4 , II=1 " Construction • SUITE 0 _ 1 P°°` Inc. _ I I EQUIP. ° /W I t sv4c 382 N.E.3rd Ave. ,W = 110 — 1 VEST. — Delray Beach,Fl. U BATH 33444 p PORCH SITTING AREA r- _ L - _ U Da - 1::._ _ L"EN -1 -- U r VEST. I I a o LAUNDRY w = I I Project I I KITCHEN ^ BATH I I Lot 2 ' BREAKFAST „� W North Del-Ida Estates r— Delray Beach,Fl. COI _ _ �{ . ((mi�ll A W1 U COI CGREAT ROOM — STUDY -1 ° �W I10 1 _ BOT NTRY (-------w- L— PANTRY II II - GARAGE wJ ll CO)p ' `J -I,. r•, Date Revision/Issue I j AICEOUIP. W I J 1COUP.i1 j\,, 1 UP r -1 r -I 1 I FOYER ' , �� AC EOU?. W .. COMP.12 Aellipli...._UMETER STAIR `1 DINING ROOM .3 IWELL 1 ` 10 ; J (W `1 J A , ° �J ° t Designed S.L. RC. U 411 ` 10 10Drawrl S.L.wS., PORTICOCheckedS.L. R.C. w ,\jWI I IIAPProvad- a—lk L_ _� �_�/yryC)JProject No. Ur ' r t Scale 1!4'=1'-0' ! 1� Ulo �/ Date 12-21-05 FIRST FLOOR PLAN U U Drawing A-2 • SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" Architecture by HDA Hunter Design AssPrialas,Inc. W 3601 N Dbde Hwy • ey WINDOW SCHEDULE SECOND FLOOR su'te11 • Boca Raton,Florida 33432 WINDOW FRAME Telephone(561)3946745 Fax(561)750-4074 E-mail: huntdesabellsauthnet NO. LOC. SIZE NOTES . W H TYPE MAn In Association with A VO D 8 VO VOD COPE C PERIMETER 30' 46' CH AWMM AWW1 P.G.T. 60' Ski AWMN. AWMN P.G.T. 80 CopeN.E.4thAvenue D PERIMETER 30 Delray Beach,Florida 33483 E PERIMETER 30' 3P FIXED ALUM. AWYR P.G.T.ROUND F VOIDFax(561)274-6707 G PERIMETER 36' OP SH AWMN. AWMN. P.G.T. H PERIMETER 2P 48' SN AWMP/ ALU EEL P.G.T. • ey DOOR SCHEDULE SECOND FLOOR • DOOR FRAME ---- HSET G LABEL NOTES AI NO. LO SIZE Mat MAIL TYPE DETAIL SET (MIN.) NOTES W Hi 200 BEDROOM 4 r217d 8-0' ALUM. ALUM FRENCH PGT Constructed by ROOF BELOW Spengler ci LJT. "1"-I- 1 Construction Inc. 382 N.E.3rd Ave. Delray Beach.Fl. 33444 ROOF BELOW U C) CU CU I II ICI I111 lI II (!) ig f ` • W_ I sae TUB CLOSET C - Project : _: BATH I _r- I I Lot 2 North Del-Ida Estates W CLOSET ROOF BELOW Delray Beach,Fl. I- BEDROOM BEDROOM yy SUITE 3 SUITE 2 1 _ . I o O ill III 0 , 1 W = SINK SINK c �w TUB E — BATH — rI II _ n t I , L JDW 1v s n L� CLOSET YY Date RevisloMssue . . 4.. '0 VEST. . ,` ,� i„ BEDROOM SUITE 4 ', STAIR \ y ICI 11=4 1=1 4=ii 1=11 WELL DOWN HHHH 1 /,, w T { Designed S.L.RC. • () — 0 \ Drawn S.L.A.S. v \\ Checked S.L. R.C. Approved /\\\ ' ROOF BELOW AillProject ND. • /�, `%` 4 ',>' BCONY Datee 12-21-05 �_� SECOND FLOOR PLAN Drawing . A-3 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" . • Architecture by • HDA Hunter Design Associates,111C. 3601 N Dixie Hwy Suite 11 • 25- ROOF PEAK , Boca Raton.Florida 33432 • Telephone(581)394-8745 1^T AINNNVIC aROTUNDA Fax(581)750�074 I I e^� Email:huntdes�betlsouthnet 6PAWSf15'ROOF TILES I� `` � I• �` _ A i �.AI ►r�rri-rr��_c��l � I � WOOD OUTRIGGER \ _• + _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _�_ _ �:_ __. '"`""'' �� In Association with . li!tM ~.i3O -�, e-- -- - I4A11"- COPE 27-P eRG HT. /` - H H H j ti 9 H �I (9 ti f Awrwr+O �� 7 Cope Architects.Inc. �j 'I II CL 80 N.E.4th Avenue 33483 g r e b e�o ol o o l aig t'3 t'9 �l Delray Beach.1)Florida-6706 Telephone(581)274.8708 SMOOTH STUCCO ON BLOCK - m DO DO 00 00 OD Fax(581)274-6707 ` m m as as ❑❑ as as BALCONY m M (2 il In En ' $PANISH'S-ROOF TILEa .�.ems--.s-.�....r..r.•-r�_ct •^+-^+ I _ 17-0'SECOND FLOOR m --- 011 rl 4 i�A J4 IU!P! 1�r c.a. 4' I �� HEBEB GAlGEDOOR MUtQE MEffl ‘''- III AND(.AST STDHE TRW Tr c NI POST LT. - -.. . _ // Pi--.-...E.-)H, ®® ®® ®® IIIMI IMII Constructed by SCONCE BEYOND �� CYPRESS WOOD GATE ' 1 -• c� Spengler • R , D'-e'FIN.FLR.-REF.ONLY CAST STONE COL DECOR CAST COL ANDTPoM /-' Construction LOT 2 Inc. 382 N.E.3rd Ave. NORTH ELEVATION Beach,Fl. 3 SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" EC-E ROOF PEAR clip ,-----1 ..r... -. - Project : `f SPANISH'S-ROOF TILES Lot 2 SPANISH'S'ROOF7YE5 North Del-Ida Estates -�e�r•r-.r�r�rt .-� rrtrr••w�r..�.-..•r•+�rtrtrtrt rt..rt..�rtrt.....�rtr-�rtrt�.e-.rt••..+rt 27-0.BRO.HT. ` n p H H I H H H n N N N N H N n N N r413 Delray Beach,FI. Z-9 WOOD OUTRIGGER ANDFASA ❑ CI ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ____0 ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑C ❑❑ PARAPET • l.-----//Ji J V — t J SPANISHS-ROOF TILES 17-0'SECOND FLOOR 45 .. �rt �rtrte-,e-r+�:»e-.rtrt rte--rtr.e-.l�rt�r.r� �_e��rt-��_rt_.n�.r�_�_r.:+n_e�e-r--��rs rtr�rt r.r.rt rea r.e�rt .��..rt.-�•�• .^^••.-• _ 1V-0'BRG HT. Date Revision/Issue `� H PI H M 11 R -I Fi H- F PI 11 PI R R F1 H R - PI r1 PI Ft 19 19 H R 1'rT CAST STONE COL ❑❑ -❑ ❑❑ ///11 R SMOOTH STUCCO ON BLOCK s 00 / POST LT. I III C❑❑ -_II WOOD GATE BEYOND I---:—.—(9-----. CYO FIN.FLR.AEF.ONLY 45 Designed S.L R.C. Drawn S.L AS. Checked S.L R.C. • Approved Project No. LOT 2 Scale 114"=1'-0' Date 12-21-05 SOUTH ELEVATION Drawing SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" A-4 r Architecture by H DA Hunter Design Associates,Inc. 3601 N DbdeIt , Suite 11 as s RooF PEAic Boca Raton,Florida 33432 . • �. Falephonex(561) (5-4 744 6745 ^ ®ROTUNDA Fax(561)750.4074 E-mai:huntdesebellsouth.net -��- SPANISH"S ROOF TILES In Association with v v v I . T 1 �I I Fi I�' I�' WOOD OUTRIGGER AND FASCIA COPE _ Zl-0'BRG.HT. 1 li F1 H h FI PI 11 H,--' Cops ch5eds,Inc. �� 1 80 N.Eray e4ta Avenue ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ /.Y„ Delray Beach.Florida 33483 WOOD OUTRIGGER AND FASCIA SMOOTH STUCCO ON BLOCK TelFax (561)274-hone 77074-8705 DO 00 OD r 111111 PARAPET _ , _ - -_:! ❑_ ❑❑ SPANISH'S ROOF TILES //J/I/t�l'�L/I/I�Y^/^�. r , --. m —�� Onik t% m ❑ 2 • - 1Zd SECOND FLOOR •Ill.Oil il 0 10 4 0 11111 0 110 11.1 OVVI1A01111111 1U-0'BRG.HT. `'�9 F1 li 9 li ^R H R PI Fi A FI Fi ..; a LI ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ "®® ®® m SMOOTH STUCCO ON BLOCK ❑❑ El El —® ®® EFER Constructed by . - A Cr-IT FIN FLR.REF.ONLY Spengler DECOR CAST COL AND TRW Construction • Inc. • 382 N.E.3rd Ave. Delray Beach,FL 33444 LOT 2 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" ZC$ROOF PEAK Project : SPANISH"5 ROOF TILES Lot 2 North Del-Ida Estates • 72-0"BRG.HT. /L Delray Beach,Fl. 1 M H A h FI Ft A `i 11 r P r` �Y7 WOOD OUTRIGGER AND FASCIA a L AWNNWG QI7 PARAPET 7-----f----f----.'-----T----...----i -----)T---- -----S-----r`J----------\I\r`I----_----. WillI �I�! \� BALCONY - `` milli el'y�� _rrr _ SPANISH'5 ROOF TILES . _ i*� _ .T77^A�7� ^, 1Z.(T SECOND FLOOR tr 1Cr-Cr BRc.Hr. Date RevisloMssue h FI PI Fi I 11 H 1 11 H h 1 H N N F i 1 11 11 1 HF H h P Fl M h r r CAST STONE COL B.-0. CASTSTONECOL • ❑❑ D❑ al-_, ❑❑_— Do ❑❑ ��-�� ❑DC❑ SMOOTH STUCCO ON BLOCK V.--- -..1 SMOOTH STUCCO ON BLOCK 1=1 F I O-0'FIN.FLRREF.ONLY 45 Designed S.L. RC. Drawn S.L AS. Checked S.L. R.C. Approved Project No. LOT 2 Scale 1/4-=1'-0. • Date 12-21-05 WEST ELEVATION Drawing SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" A-5 • . - - - ,R13.05 SW010000.✓apk Plan • MATERIAL SCHEDULE SITE DATA. RESIDENTIAL oaz) • • • - • • • " 'ten • (Lot 2) • ATohlklaro 11,a00 RR - • . •Qty. Kay Bot9nlcaU Common Name Size aw.o..fwsa..+.sr..� 1700 6yR ,.�,OB Read BId4E 601 D1ftr • - -GTW,AaPw i IL aL - . - • - 11 Roy anwaay.lgQuaaW kooks pas. 1074.JNL aAwtla.YAPmpOca.(SECURED) bu1 a`n . " a I,P.• n>1Ma YWI R c1d YaLsollac 41 20000 DCa 24 - • • • 1 Vol VYmlo0para O.a 10410em,rPda u•141.0.0a . 1 Ppd Pgaao.p.mra1aa IAkaa0,p40h1► lbt/a� • EArrtlaaaa.dab,aPmmOmw•p.WaO 1,159%GR• _ - a 2 Cap Ca.patlmfa larlYWWCII•II OP.Ia F.IIYM.p1aa1REO1tRBL ff.DYIaI ral 6yft • - • • . • - 3 WV Bropa?i amb&O.aaba baboaaa /2aa • na M raB.Y1a.Pa0.13ED• .300 OaR - • . • ' 2 DC• .Soma Pa11P1�Daa,lla»Y ►iaaa RToWmab,da0aAV1r •' 16(ma.r.a0106.0 _ 1 W WVmatap dIp4 01 b6eNagYa L40oaY Halt - LTabl00401IEG SIII 5 Taw - . P-A-2000ap2) • ^� • I PI C.• CI o ,p.,adWOmmma. 1.7B.o:aa. 1Ta41..o0artlaarP100MOED .z,D, .Ipa1.a4Y,l+a LOT 3 _. I� 1•1 . a a «rnm.r..lum Dawn- y.n•I..q.aaLr..y • S 8Y aT • - a 1a Ib0• ,IosY pals.ar/DA 0000 1 1Pap.02oA ILTafal male,d lama•••REQUIRED a Tam • • DO DPa Dar,q paNap.aO /67a01Px lTddrsbar derraaw PROJOED a T.YaPals , . —_ •llft . a,B laaavPa•ata+aldoQawlm•aea 2no-02ac _ _— __-----_—_—'F• ENCE •~_ i �� I via �,/y I . .OY• F000 alp.Pmw baud 16•3001Pac . .. I 1 �,// I�•+ 1 ' ' ,ate • - :- II/ OT 2- _ �� d Q{e�� °j� �<.� .� CO 1r,• N.phmMpta app..maoalm 2�007aha . I I • -' • -•.>�//' • t// 00 N ABpaMp.aabYl.lA+labptytlbaaa 1TIa01'aa • -I • - - —_- • -- • • . • ‘�� - , • uoa. w.dA61r1;aAr 2BY002a� • • 10.00 SET BACK .1aWalwaw•mees.Mr lug 1 "� 1 10 IaA 1PiB0 tx —=_ = r �1 tom.:%//A • • Asa amtaor. OaaabbalmROW..2 _ 1! a I _—• 1 -•• V • C) 0MQ NOT '4,010 eyvawpMldr.i,.dwpba..parp,awm ! !� ! o _ �!�.� • �D� iffirjr-47�!e• �• o Z Qs • uNDscAPeNarrr.,l • I• ! _ __ .�� ',�` , _ �''_ ® - PO t>- • I.N.1.•a•so�bAJYRaE.W, .r YYr JYsodft dW AL..iia.Ny.Or` • 113 xi I ,, - {!att., 1,_ _ • (4J I • �/ _ • ......W.rJI.I..rQ.WYW►x•,xwJ a,Y 1Wr•sA.daa • ". I- :.I%w lis! la - ' LN..rrntlei EJ harp A A..M ftQ.a•A r.ra.Mad away►wJ ram 1 _ • 1\ \ Ial - ' . iWNaKY.aW dlwpba.Yod4r NaWa..YI.JN4Y1r Odd • .. - I �, 1p1 R I � : . ��::: {/`^ \ 1/�1 , .. Q yrW pas awe WxW.wa..0a miaow Am.Spay tVaaa.wo mill pW.Wb.Y • • I I7 �� I {•f rieii:: `�L t��l�� -! ' .Q 1 !1 .. . • . .raWVWJa Q..uMeaarrsd•.u.W.mma.wpl.WN•Wddb.Ti.ad.ape I ". •�� I ' . f1N_IIi\ ��,� 1 II - W maarr.arwpmYwbr..r.lww.as.mwv»,ww..Ypl.r,.apr..p. \ ;D`.• �eua6r:ti�� :U�1 r ta• { I !I • Q W • Wr1r140uaapYr aWl b.liapMr a•..ao•dam"maw _ , II { 011at1..U{ ! Q. _ i•..: c._atcd.! ! IbWWWaaJa.•egadda..Wl•aie.Aada.Y•wham app..•LN•raiu.•.yr• • •. •. f 1.1.,.1ta'a! 1 'WI - W . �''abw..a I' • (":.:) I' I .. !'iI\�a t+p�f a, s a __--_----_, a ol1 Z b~1H•rW1.aLrJasYr.rY..WW.ddpd.foY.l.YmWYdINIRpd ASefltlw.lat •,• �l 1 .• —DI r - -� UII •� 10 bola Mardd..a.WlmrdPmalMAlmrd.rpl►SarJ..br.A V.•arw I II -- AObeIna+ld.aa•a.Ybamdf o Yar a boos aims le/lydaxawsgob be YWWri• - •_ 1 `,I-, 0 11 - 1 .bydP,WrplriraJ W YyPNY.41ya•ira�l.i•W,a..p.la.a.Y 1 ' be a.dw.iA• mamma md. EKTO.&NEW PLANT MATERIALS.LOCATED WITHIN THE I W II �l I RI -L�-=� ! •jl !� POOL EQUIP. W ZI SM:bV.i.rquµ M.ObrbYb•g1.. Ylpl.dca.r --- a•.—.aal.r■ l r 1 - II - II �' SIGHT TRIANGLE.ARE TO BE MAINTAINED Q 38.OYERALL HEIGHT 1� Narn`Aa11..`mbm D010T)Werpa.aldp.t.Ir.1.Y.Wm.ea.NNaaNw • - • I g II. /�,, ' - 'n'.=,1' I {p z I Q • 7.Nvr••.1 WaaWlt•..IpNwiaan-A/mar.Y.l.1.bbama.RN11•.lybi J.a b •I' • @% /- I , •' •• . .rd.Tcm:"r.N.as..SC UIdela&Pas.MM.ai-e.rllv.frW.atl - 1 O 1• • .. • I' �,•-� • q.INO MUSS MULCH WALL.BE UM=ON71.000E4T. 1 , !I • W ENW..baOwNaWr•dbbY.WWpVc•x•YadYVa�SMJ.WSdepwpL WY.p I Z I' ua•,p.r.pYaa M.�Y.Y..YpPdx...ar�.,.YIM.p.dpN. p Z, PROPOSED TWO '1 €� • N Jlwpbw4aa/1.Wdilayplvpi.Npp,pup.oa•N•ipdeaBlBrwhpw I Il� , STORY RESIDENCE I g p 1.Sri...d b•al.iw el l wd Jr paallaha W&mar r a•yi..d Comma•aA•Mr • • 1001 K•Y. Y.pr.r.pa.lYW,aw4ppaM.x•W040.1.aaQarN.map '-, II I �•p•�, !I a0, - - • • ..aYAwYrq.Fy.phW W.yhY.p.••am.ri.LYlYppaxd.a aaJllpxar.dYu. I .� II I a Q - D 1 • 1 Z• • •plsNIh.b..........26,•a.MaB.•MY.dba cr./hwrt,M loGwp.aaotla•WI!• • rm.bb4J.rYAWm.{r.ab.nad..A a.Wayhm•mxN.•p.b1YA•wr 1Wa i • D 7 1 ' • WId.dam hi.m row4.14.. od, .b•S.Kaase•oa.Wl*abIl..eps..lw • 1 II f I II - . • 11.AY.d•h.14•fa.Nr•,-'- ap•Oa•L Sd O.Y V.sdoW I ae0pM1-Lal I I I• !I _ tl.h.i..sN..4p.x,,Ysv A mr 1444.YYs 0.Oa. u V.r.dpaayY*IT lamtlyda Jr laoY4 Ode.aol..dda a1.W1 Y.Y • . .r...l prat pbwbm - 1 - ; ,I • - ,D IL AY Na.A Vaaamm.Yal1*J,IIW B.•p.I.Iil o aya ad W xp•me tr•malt/ •. I Q W I'� a 11 �• . dam J.a.aw dauhlwW. IStaa.P1 .mp.Yr.AO•.gBbnp.la.x.pl.aWiay 0 - ' O {I C p.V v.rW.mmaowwyy4dr•aD.r4r6r Yia.•bm..paryr YaMY N aa� "� 7 • 'I(-�lI I ; 0 O dpca...l4baaapiaeooa.W.it aaa•v I.NUYbB 0..a.4..ssm•o•o.. • - I l��- I ILA—�J1JJ�I COMP 1 LL' D.Mrpapar dry humpslowla.al.amdr ma.*dd.*.aY.i1.TY baA•p• - N. r�' '� �,% _ I 1111 _ • .mom.shall meow.soya J data rycud araW Or Brae xadif.ada J .apa.•ikB4 A� It Th..m.Jd•bw.ri`br 6.Y0dba•b•Lpp comma. 1' I •.` \ /A I. • 11.NVd.x.phwi0io rauud Vas.,pdr la rl•aa1••xaa.aa••a•••'•a-a• LU ��\I �� \r'•� . ` ` • /N• • {I[fl t � ICOMPl, • t ,r ' , • II FPLMETEi/DISC. 713 4: 1- 1 �ATE�I H . wit' • — , ST'/ 4111111 / j::a tI'-c. . .ke Pi >4��,j. --�-- ---- s.r^j�' UNDERGROUND y . • • MAN.••. I • .!• \��`�'��,rItIL1 / 1(l "/�+IV/' _ ILA '`` 1�-I( POWER COC' O •• 1 •Y I• alas �:� • v •a•r. a'�?J . F rN I • 1 Wu��u ��• `\,1/ ERGROUND WATER 0•• • �' `l1 a • vEwFT c • Nma..w • `�: Y. BRICK W Trifelcia I : 1 ➢SJM1 1'•4 I . 6 . • • .az C.I. 4 r.w....ow �;il�.,A i MOTOR `11 ,.�` w • • aodl Ta Sy 1 , E:�arA�, � COURT I . , 11ii m • Shrubs a I, • t lour-,tS• w 1� I Ma. "TM .E a • �'r • Groundcovars • I L • \\\yur,v �� -•_ • • ellfrin _ W• �.calW am• MW.' I \ - y 1 /i1?allAa Yy WJ Vpwa«.J «i:.'1..1a 1..• N , aa.rw p .. _ - ki,\ \ • II 1' 11 . ..p W 0. rrYN _•...•4 IwW. IIL .min.••.a.•rW `., W.. /I - - \a..ra N.W 1r..a p.l NrY.rw rM a 11.1rpT1 Nw /� WM+1a.,•a Nw•••.Yw I \mr ,1' NV �'I I \ • 3' C N•Sharm Yl.•••w /'\\ Y•�•1... �j mr r•..NrN+Nr 1. .4 co 1 L .x•Y.Yr. I _ . I 1 v� Z •WNW \ a'.h.ap•••.N a•. �1 area p µp.Y.•Ywa.wa.a , 'N• I -YIN W 1lrJ'•a'Nat • �`�� • I 1 - 'We./W. illik I �r•1..Nam.. r 0J N•W I YaS r - ._. -- - - —•- -----•�--- -• • • • \/ • rmay aJIll'! I `ttrT- •• ! - 9[ S'W 1 - . . an.w.ew l. - �--a�w �_ @mill_. ln- •.a,'. • ! EXIST.SIDE WALK DRAWNla *ow.Ya.•.rat• ... - .... '-a.-.r. -.. �j - - ..•Y.lmwdr.N.rmx...rN.mm.p.r. LOT 2 C p,5.....'... ).. -, _• .aMreRw Slralght hunk Palms mT4 N rm•�rY Yr ar N.w .,+. N.•.a N V•r.Y•••waw. ''a .,.aN.w.INr..Y.rarrN . INS ' avow Maas • • SITE PLAN �.�,� • • �_/ • • - . dG�'N0. SCALE:1/8"=t'-0" NE 7TH STREET �.a,5 • • amain . • . ia1aoe5Ud n9I av�l rmp • ' • woas.rev.dsa.Pun IRRIGATION LEGEND . . • . • - - • • • 1.91.00 R»OBd.&sca D.." • J.L U.eau6PoPW61V Pcsat pat;da I•NMw• • e33$-j _To+nSAUPaP1i.8W Sgw.IPc4 P�wwu.rr - . - . • • • ►• nimar.TPPwrar.w.rla•WrAr _ - a . • • wait • - . . YYpagia.Y tan.' ' WATER 6OUSIM W mY.,6W Arty bats ara - • . - - - - - MOTOWMIke MAMA rarbm•••Nw.Yb pasAle.W4.•4• - • - w Ado.er.Ar.er.rb rar6.11ar1..INAIAz N•••11. LOT 3? . •:- . • - ,S DO.3T a3"W ---------- ` 4 ,i = POOL wwoAnoNNDTEs: • • I 1 ---to.00 s - c•_—_- �-- DECK __ II Pr.,.,.gw,,w,rvw 1 I t 'Ii 1 . . V • oe1.6p•1. - 1 -• .1 ' q.Y....rbrlrraaarorelrwl Wdlar.a.a C•eY.q•erl•a.• • .I • - , -, VII— SO II • .. N 3 Cil I OUT • $ y II a I-0 faOmerr•.IIYMIbYariM•P.Wrtrrb•dgp..✓r1.0prbarr• ,rbrTaWr4 WPY+.0YW1IoaY111FAE9W1fEYD�POI.IV IIFAP9 %1Is I �; - �� .. �. - - tau»nraPTlcw�nrcr. ' ' • t _ ' W m nd.�rP�w+ArrrWrr.ca+.mrrrrAvrnm All �• •' ` • _ h'- a•rr.r...r.•.1wb.r.rA.svrrw+YArwY mrrrwrYrrar.ArrrY+rrra.pArrP.d..Yrrr..rr , + ,• I `_ ' __Sd__— ----- I II V . p.rr.r.rr.rree.ar• - ill - - - • • TrnrrWq.s•lnAANA•4.Wp•.ai�m•.1.Gd N.lradba.pr.. . 6r4W4VIro.�Nriwallnd.dr•rrbANioaYiCNiA1Cd s I. II. a 11 - I �1 1t14kIl2N�� m N 17 1 .. I 1 ..� t i�tbIDs6>r.rblp.rmYagtP.Aint I ,D ' 1 1 W- •.awa•rYrr4itr6al.•PA NA.r b bra r pp.s••••..r•••••1 • ' ' Wmmar.e+wwbw+.c.o..rr.abp..b..arwmavmed.wmlr Aga - 1 ._1= .� • ri - I 'i are g e� ........................................ • I I�.. ' -• - a _ !I II Z .-l.,(y Nap1gP•Ca.••MYrp•ItlTaW P••d•r6anbrW m.ym+- / '�, 1 - J—_ b •� �_ __mot/ 'T� uM.nP•6Saru.rfiMYwWiOr.Pww..ie.4.V.sawlw W'Ibr - - - 1 �. _--_`__-�- • 1` II - • v • Q�� pisM✓.1ra•.r►d.P••••••1•01•N..serN.rabi•••dYb T•.le•MMi•I1••I+Ir1.r.1..bP••os.•wrr••P~I AAdr • I , I �jZ(a� •Pa.lral.. memrb•r....A•r.r.erbrbgprs+r�.wl+•r �1 - • 1�J .�I POOL EQUIP.. 0- �� Z•'4 saw. wbc.�•••alaer.emP+.•iw�w.c.Irrnrl.a ' - W' I. • - i _ I I II • 0 V a~1� leT•aTf b✓.s•0/pp•LfaYa rY4W a6a1G e.Ylgbt•••iras•'.WbY ��• ....brlr•.frq I 1 ill • .de Kumi•••1•YMY•bbYWl.ba�ebt AA poY..ts•.•ul.im.. 1•em M.A.YAWI..Asa rbP..4IP.4M••••• '' • . • .el.�br•rl..rY.r.1.r•.•yb1rY/OasK.Nlotllr-ei.f.n6W tm bWd10sO.N«Ml•n WMri•61••I6••mp•.T•LM1W.Ys.l.tlbr M./.• •. O, I� , - ' • ' • - pY.tl. rrr..ri•,br.gr.p.•..•r.•IPat.r..>agmoi,� • - - 4 Ill • AAYmrl4sngWeYlln.D.rt••IWb.•b.dbYw{..P.•muu•.W'•4•AAO.Y , ,., , ,.. I ••• - PROPOSED TWO . •t , - -� - ,,rur.r•Y$dwrrlla 1+Yara waawoe• • drar.a.La. STORY RESIDENCE 1 (I �rq•I.1u•prs•r • Ybaat0.d.•0••p.q•.r.mYPYWpw••Wr•Y • •.1 1.- 11 V-0. ' . N/glWrMbOh•emera.M.bdaal...d MreY.q+11••••Wgaa - NA.sook•brlrb•pr•.••b 1pb.r.IVarar••••••..P•• I• O . I ui • I' • d_ Z . p D , I Z 1••••Y.•.1•.•porfAAA.d ANON*•b AAA,AAA,la Ono P1C6Y... Pops,.•r••.Wa.rrl.gr..,•rrr*.A.a••.•rrYp••.rs Ml • 1 ' - 11 . 1 i' - .✓t..rrrA•Y.r•Y.b.rb•grerr.plW CpMi Wir•YYrar. ••1•tr4CadYrW bW1•q�ir.r4!rrlorYrsapa.rWgwe>••n•. I1111 .. • I 'I - n.•.arsgreb•P•bryrgbK WIIiRO.88T]I • - 1 lik �1 ♦• .a .. .:�::.... I 1 Z i�� Ip•Iq•0•rr/W.bpbdr.pw•eYe•G.IbeCNNO.1mr••F•NawP4W' AAA. d•NA.A r bY1Kp.w.i Asta aAako.Y.a••.bY• ❑ �_��i- •11-0: _ IDT•,.'•-•, 1^ I I 0 -• Iri:r.�u...rw...rraw.onCr.I.r.a•mrbrwrmwz6. r1+..WpatlI.M1WN+ ••I � �� r/ 1.�%„ 7 - l_' COO Pi t — CWtr.dtl.rl rr.Ia•1'b1i•YYrfa•31•LLrYIDPK•V• I /Z., �� 1 , • . • Peap••q.•a••p1ymr AAA taYrarbaom.. " , v� ti - . - {.� Pa•h•6rrwarbem.mp..I.pl,rlarw•• arord.lrl.rtw �•1 ' - • mrdbw.e•...idrutrYrw•r Tr........... iC.CW.. Caw.....ub.•P•r.•/•• •A..,.. ....� , -Ill •�'a if& •-• D l./ CCO -.12 I 1 V. 4drYWIY r•40►•b•1.6•.gotli.Ia•.se Aar em•ra.r AAA. Tr11P.p�mIW.Wpmr✓•Mr.vb.M•+IW..a••••ldb - 01 I - I -M I - _ _ spas.a•s•p.d.sY1 a.M.d amr au..beW rearp••WW.1p•aw PA•I.•••ipA•11.AA wars•OA r1.W..11wdgar.Ymm•a.•111.d • 1II '• 1 • L •� a�� ell GATE I ' !— • •tr•Aa bp.*11ba•.Ats.®•r•rmm•r•t•d..•Ya.ANN..* Apr of .A1*a obrb•bb.be to•••••.•••11.w NAL • I • •, Q . li„ - Popa••p.••.a•0.1rim•••r•;d/roP..rnwlarwba.aarr.W v+ 1 1 • .rt.no4rbr.I.errpgwwp.r+•.+.�a+...w•.�Amv.a• ( - .) ��`�_i��i•_ _ • ' • . DMA_ - C• .7 , __ _ UNDERGROUND • COW r bWW.pM.•bb _ _____ IIIN u R..r .IPa...a . ( 'I ��!' I .30.00esET6ACK � -- — I G O - . �. 1 _ 1 e ,n I UNDERGROUND WATER • 0- - - 1" VERIFY C I I • BRICK'' ; .-_ BRICK , I IiI 1 Ol Lt W_ . 1 • !• MOTOR • a .,COURT • ,, • • • . \ % 47'N.111111:111*144"'1,F.411111i4L 11 i a Z '117 I \. lr . . • • . .....__ __ __ __ __ _ , t h.&hi; i '4.... .."........ 4 • . . . • ;.. ,_,..,,„,,. i •• - •E WALK \_ • - I I .ONAwN 1 G 1 • • LOT 2 - 1 �V.� — ' • o� 1`J SITE PLAN .`A" • . JOU NO. =/ SCALE:1/8u=1'-0" ' NE 7TH STREET• : :T - • • -------=--------- • ------------------------------ • 2 • • . . 0 DElRAY BEACH - " DEUUY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD � timpMEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT 'Ili., 195)3 1993 2001 :001 Agent: Andrew Spengler Property Owner: Coastal Property Holdings, LLC Property Address: 112 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District (Formerly 107 NE 6th Street) HPB Meeting Date: March 15, 2006 COA: 2005-382 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for construction of a new two-story residence and landscape plan located at 112 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 1, Block 2, North Del-Ida Estates Replat, zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). The property, located in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, previously contained a Contributing one-story, single-family dwelling and detached, single-car garage. During its meeting of August 3, 2005, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and recommended approval for the demolition of the existing structures based on the fact that they appeared to have very little architectural or historical merit. The subject property was previously a part of six (6) non-conforming lots which have since been reconfigured and replatted into four (4) conforming lots. The subject lots measures approximately eighty-two feet (82') in width and one-hundred twenty feet (120') in depth. The Staff report for the replat, which was reviewed at the HPB meeting of June 15, 2005, stressed that the layout and design of the four (4) proposed single family homes `....will be required to meet strict historic presentation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area.' In September 2005, the applicant submitted the first proposals for two of the four properties (Lots 1 and 2). The applications then went through Staff's review process, at which time comments were generated directing the applicant to revise the proposals. The applicant met with Staff in October 2005 to review the submittals. At the meeting of January 18, 2006, the Board reviewed the application for 116 NE 7th Street (Lot 2) before the review of the subject property. Based on the review of the proposal on Lot 2, the applicant requested to postpone review for 112 NE 7th Avenue (Lot 1). The Staff Report prepared for that meeting concluded with a recommendation to continue with direction based on the following suggestions: 1) That the overall scale and mass be reduced to lessen the impact of the large scale and mass on the surroundings; 2) That the garage be further set back from the front wall plane on the north elevation or made a separate entity, and; 3) That the swimming pool be revised so as to not encroach in the required ten foot (10') setback for swimming pools. 1111 42 NE- `Street.CO .200 383 HPB Mee in a March 1 ,2006 The applicant has submitted revised plans and is now before the Board for the second time for the construction of a two-story, single family residence at 112 NE 7th Street. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The current proposal consists of the construction of a two-story, Mission style single-family residence. Revisions submitted by the applicant include the following: oHeight increase from 27'6"-28'6"to 30'6"; olncrease in square footage under a/c from 4,050 to 4,111; oDecrease in total building square footage from 5,280 to 5,010; olncrease in garage location from front setback of 3'6"to 27'; oChange from smooth texture on block to a textured stucco on block; oDecrease in 2"d story width on front elevation from 61'6"to 40'; The fenestration consists of impact resistant, aluminum, single hung and casement windows with cast stone sills, some of which are arched. Decorative board and batten shutters with shutter dog hardware are proposed for many of the windows throughout. The main (north) elevation which faces NE 7th Street is made up of one and two-story elements. The front entry is emphasized by a flat-roof, arched portico containing a central column and parapet above. The entry contains a custom made wood door topped by a decorative paneled arch. The overall elevation is broken up by various masses. The central mass is topped with a hip roof and contains two masses which protrude to the north, one of which extends from the main roof plane, the other which contains its own hip roof. Below the protruding hip roof„ another portion juts out to the north, and is topped with a parapet which extends down as a wall to the ground and past the side wall plane. The one-story, two-car garage located to the west measures twenty-two feet (22') in width and seventeen feet (17') in height and contains two arched metal doors. The east (side interior) elevation consists of one large, two-story mass with a one-story mass to the south. The two-story mass measures fifty-two feet, six inches (52'6") in depth while the one- story element to the south measures twenty-one feet (21') in depth. On the opposite side, the west (side interior) elevation consists of the main two-story mass and along with the one-story garage element and as well as the extended one-story portion from the east elevation. The rear (south) elevation consists of the large two-story mass with each of the one-story projections at the east and west. In the center, on the first-story, there is a set of French doors flanked by fixed panels of the same configuration and topped with an awning of an unspecified material. A similar configuration is located to the east, underneath the one-story projection, but does not include the awning. A four foot (4') tall stucco on block wall juts out from each side of the main elevation and extends out ten feet (10'), containing a six foot (6') tall arched, cypress wood gate in the center. The site plan notes a perimeter fence throughout the property. However, there are no submitted details containing this information. Extensive landscaping is proposed throughout as is a rear yard swimming pool, measuring twenty-eight feet (28') in length and fourteen feet (14') in width. The proposed color scheme is as follows: • Stucco— Bronzed Beige (Muted Yellow) • Fascia, Soffits, and Outriggers—Pine Cone (Brown) • Entrance Door and Decorative Shutters—Stained Mahogany • Cast Stone Columns, Window Trim and Sills - Buff 112 NE-.0 Street,COA 2035-263 HPB Meeting Match 15,2906 ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Objective A-12.1 of the Comprehensive Plan, offers that to assist the residents of the City in maintaining and enhancing their neighborhood environment, the City shall take steps to ensure that modifications in and around the neighborhood do not lead to its decline, such as those described in the following policies. Policy A-12.4 The City will provide planning and technical assistance to implement neighborhood-supported initiatives aimed at preserving the character of existing residential areas. Such assistance may involve the formulation of regulations that would limit size and scale of new homes to be consistent with the existing structures within a defined neighborhood, and analysis of the housing inventory to determine if the area qualifies for designation as a historic district, and similar measures. Design Elements LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-k), "Development Standards"provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The Board shall consider the following: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non- contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of height, front facade proportion, proportion of openings (windows and doors), rhythm of solids to voids on front facades, rhythm of buildings on streets, rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections, relationship of materials, texture and color, roof shapes, walls of continuity, scale of building, directional expression of front elevation. The following criteria have not been met: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. The height of the proposed structure measures thirty feet, six inches (30'6"). Overall, the height is within the maximum allowed (35') in terms of zoning regulations; however, it is not appropriate within the context of the historic district in which it is located. Its inappropriateness lends to the very prominent and large, two-story mass. In addition, HPB NE $tree' .,A 20 5 382 l t P `s�:t�. lii i tL'&ch ":�.20063 11 the two-story elements are not stepped back therefore providing full, two-story wall planes on all elevations. (b) Front Facade Proportion: The front facade of each building or structure shall be visually compatible with and in direct relationship to the width of the building and to the height of the front elevation of other adjacent or adjoining buildings within a historic district. The front façade proportion, as proposed, is not visually compatible as there is no relation with the front elevation of the adjacent and surrounding buildings in the Del- Ida Park Historic District. The front façade is essentially a forty foot (40') wide, two story mass with a twenty-two foot (22') wide one story element to the west. The elevation in question is much larger in mass and scale when compared to its surroundings. (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. Del-Ida Park Historic District is an area made up of simple homes with minimal scale and mass. The proposed compatibility regarding windows and doors is not consistent with the existing/historic patterns. (d) Rhythm of Solids to Voids; Front Facades: The relationship of solids to voids in the front facade of a building or structure will be visually compatible with the front facades of historic buildings or structures within the district. The amount of solid proposed is not compatible with that of the existing structures in the historic district. (e) Rhythm of Buildings on Streets: The relationship of buildings to open space between them and adjoining buildings shall be visually compatible with the relationship between historic sites, buildings, or structures within a historic district. The streetscape rhythm in this area is low-scale. The second-story elements would need to be further revised in order to mitigate their impact in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. This would include incorporating second-story elements into a predominately one-story structure should the applicant not find a compatible solution that is entirely one-story. (f) Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Protections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with the prevalent architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The rhythm of entrances in the Del-Ida Park Historic District does not include such visibility of garage elements/structures even though the garage has been set-back from the front building wall. However, it has been suggested on various occasions that the garage be located to the rear or as a separate structure. (i) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. In order for new construction to be compatible in any existing neighborhood, the existing structures must at least be considered in terms of style, size, scale, and mass. This importance extends specifically to the context of a historic district. When reviewing the subject application, it is evident that this has not occurred as the historic district was not taken into consideration. (k) Directional Expression of Front Elevation: A building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures, and sites in its directional character, whether vertical, horizontal, or nondirectional. While the directional expression of the front elevation is 1"2 NE' Street O12005 83 HPB Meetine Mareh 16.2006 apparent, its scale is too excessive for and not visually compatible with the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that: oNew additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (Standard#9) oNew additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. (Standard# 10) The intent of Standards 9 and 10 have not been met and are essential in creating a compatible environment in the historic districts. Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines o For buildings where additional height is allowed, stepping back the upper stories may help to minimize the difference as viewed from the street. oAll infill must be compatible with the surrounding buildings and yet must be differentiated from the historic building stock. oThe height of any new building should be similar to those of other buildings along the streetscape. o The new construction should be compatible with the width of the surrounding buildings. o The relationship of new construction adjacent to significant historic resources can either enhance or detract from the historic setting of the district. o The character of the massing should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. oRoof forms and pitch should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. The above noted guidelines have been pointed out because their intent has not been met or taken into consideration. A look at the historical patterns within the Del-Ida Park Historic District might give more insight into complying with the above-noted guidelines in the context of the subject district. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION While the proposed two-story, Mission style residence is a beautiful design, it does not belong in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. Del-Ida Park was one of Delray's earliest planned communities and, in 1988, was one of the City's first designated historic districts. It is predominantly made up of one-story structures possessing a minimal size, scale, and mass. It must be reiterated that the property consisted of six (6) non-conforming lots which have been reconfigured and replatted into four (4) conforming lots. The Staff report for the replat stressed that the layout and design of the four (4) proposed single family homes `....will be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area.' This requirement has not been satisfied. . .^_ fE' Street.Cass 200 38 HPB Mee*:rfl March 15.2006 • The applicant has submitted a total of three (3) proposals for review, none of which have adhered to the City's LDRs, historic preservation guidelines or the existing context of the historic district which should be considered for representative examples for new development proposals. Therefore, based on the analysis made throughout the staff report, positive findings cannot be made with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for a new dwelling at 112 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based upon positive findings with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness for a new dwelling at 112 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness for 112 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Report Prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: Proposed Elevations, Site Plan, Survey, &Floor Plan Architecture by LOT 3 LOT 4 3r e- TWO STORY SET BACK H DA 81.8T Hunter Design As �As,Inc. ��.�rs,��.�, «��..,�..R 3601 N Dixie Hwy �.�.....�._..... ) Suite 11 Boca Raton.Florida 33432 YARD Telephone(581)384-6745 Fax(581)750.4074 ------' E-mail:huntdesI bellsouthnet ^• I 10.00'SET BACK Y In Association with I . . I gI COPE O I POOL POOL va SITE COVERAGE : 8Cope 0N.E.d>aectenue y a D DECK o 80N.E.4thAvenue 1 LOT SIZE 120.05'x 81.8T:9828 SQ.FT. Delray Beach,Florida 33483 C` ,� �o v BUILGING AREA COVERAGE:3232 SQ.FT. Telephone(561)274-6706 r ____=_= BRICK DRIVE AND WALK AREAS:1533.1 SQ.FT. Fax (581)274 8707• POOL AREA 430 SQ.FT. IPOOL EQUIP k 1 I POOL DECK AREA 603.7 SQ.FT. I! I / 1 ui 11 SQUARE FOOTAGE: I o I i i 1ST.FLOOR A/C:2283 SQ.FT. L. Q 2 ND.FLOOR MC:1828 SQFT. TOTAL AfC:4111 SQ.FT. LLi5 I GARAGE:538.6 SQ.FT.. 1ST.FLOOR PORCHES:234 SQ.FT. Iio - PORTICO:128 SQ.FT. • PROPOSED D IN i COMP.XL CONSTRUCTION TYPE AS PERCH.601 F.B.C.2005 EDT. rY OCCUPANCY:SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE GROUP R g TWO STORY , o EQUIP. w j W RESIDENCE D p ( I] Constructed by • 11c N J i METER - 4 ABOVE CROWN OF S/ 1 ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION Spengler ,t-\I. .Y� c GATE' NORTH DEL-IDA ESTATES Construction J l a 1 BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS 11 THROUGH 16.INCLUSIVE, GATE . I I I BLOCK 2,DEL-IDA PARK(PLAT BOOK 9,PAGE 52, Inc. ^ ( ii, 1 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY.FLORIDA), BEING IN SECTION 9,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH.RANGE 43 362 N.E.3rd Ave. {___I WATER EAST,CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,PALM BEACH COUNTY. Delray Beach'FL 33444 ' V. I UNDERGROUND FLORIDA I I' t POWER II II I I I SITE LOCATION : I o I i1 I C=—' '`=-■ ---❑---- -------J I I i N 6N STREET Project • 30.00'SET BACK (- m i I I 1 N LOT 3- LOT4 Ghl Lot 1 I I =-ICK ' - a / North Del-Ida Estates 1 I wALKwA I A � y BRICK I i o A LOT Delray Beach,Fl. MOTOR 1 COURT I ' 7th STRFET . I I 1 I 0 II YARD YARD I I ' LOT 17 I .1 , BLOCK 2 LOT 21 LOT 1 I 2��TM38-HT. I. I • PII 0- —_ —_ COACH LTG.—_—_—_—_--i ► 7 81.8T • EXIST.SIDE WALK • Date Revision/Issue NE 7TH STREET Designed S.L R.C. Drawn S.L.A.S. Checked S.L. R.C. LOT 1 Project No. Approved . SITE PLAN sale „8 = 1' . :: Date 1-23-06 \_/ SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" DRIVE Drawing A-1 Architecture by w HDA Cey WINDOW SCHEDULE FIRST FLOOR Hunter Design A IPa,lnc. 3801 N Dude Miry Sulte 11 WINDOW FRAME Boca Raton,Florida qu I7 n r#Fa a • Telephone (561)394.6745 NO. LOC. NOTES SIZEFax E-mail: E-ma::huntdesibelsouth.net TYPE MAIL MAT'L I I W H — t • A PERIMETER 3S 06' SH ALUMNI. ALUM. P.G.T.ARCH TOP I In Association with a PERIMETER 30' SO' SH ALUMNI. AWMN. P.G.T. I I DRILLCOPE C PERIMETER 24' 4a SFi ALUM. ALUM. P.G.T. J__ D PERIMETER Ell ALUMN. AWLr11 ROT. PORCH POOL Cope Architects.Inc. BO N.E.4th Avenue NOTE:WITHE FRAMES. I • Delray Beach.Florida 33483 I Telephone(581)274-6703 I I451 D Fax(581)274-6707 105 ..II L {� f—�1 D .e DOOR SCHEDULE FIRST FLOOR IC D DOOR FRAME I D 1 D W W NO. LOC. SIZE HSEETR. LABEL i 104 i 103 U U NOTES yyyy MAIL MAIL TYPE DETAIL W HT BREAKFAST 100 PORTICO 3 0 C•P WO WO S.C. CUSTOM ROOD I ARUM I 101 r:ea r, e1r 8-0- MTL MTL F1LSH INSULATED WITH APPLIED TRW O I I LAUNDRY 102 SIDEC•2ArT 3•.rr S'-0' Mn. MTL RAISE PNL e1SULATED 00 I SINK 103 LAUNDRY Y-0' 8-0' MTL MTL RA/SEPNL INSULATED a COOS 1 _ _ . .{� �I�- W ! ° Ew1M Constructed by • 104 DYING ROOM (2)3'-0- B'-Ir ALUM. ALUM FRENCH PGT W/SIDE LT.)5- 00 .,0) �_L=I^____. - 105 BREAKFAST (2)3'-0' B-0- ALUM ALUM FRENCH PGT W/SIDE LT.3r LE Spengler � / 0.1 MCP. ' FAMILY ROOM Y C3A] Construction u } , J J °" I I . nc. 382 N.E.3rd Ave. REF Delray Beach.FL KITCHEN 10 33444 7I17 iv GARAGE / ) COMP.01 1 coup.�1 L P. Ual i r-r , 'w I- 1 I- 1 x- MC EQUIP. PDWD. COMP.A2 Project W VEST. _ � DINING ROOM Lot 1 hiaro, North Del-Ida Estates Cmo STAIR DelrayBeach,Fl. • W i WELL l J J ]J Ai I D I I D L_ STUDY _ W 101 101 - __ � CU CB — W — UP =j_U= "uk 0 Date Revision/Issue W �. FOYER BATH = (CD/ '1 I LIVING ROOM ©g II j_ - • FIREPLACE Y 7 TUB OPTIONAL 1].O — (wn) U D �/ ____!.e 1U0 Designed Si. R.C. PORTICO Drawn S.L.AS. Checked S.L. RC. Approved L� r1 Project No. 1. — I II _I LJ Scale 1/4'=V-0" L V 1J J Dale 1-23-06 NN7 U U U FIRST FLOOR PLAN Drawing A-2 SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" Architecture by H DA Hunter Design Associates,Inc. 3601 N Dixie Hwy Suite 11 Boca Raton,Florida 33432 - w z Telephone(hone 394$745 1 . ey WINDOW SCHEDULE SECOND FLOOR I F-maii: 1)75°�ma r— E-mail: a(581)39-6745 et WINDOW FRAME NO. LOC. SIZE NOTES TYPE MATL MATT ROOF BELOW In Association with W H COPE A VOIDopa Architects,Inc.B PERIMETER 30• 6P OH AWFULAW C MN- P.G.T. 80 N.E.4Ihchi AvenueIn Delray Beach,Florida 33483 c PERIMETER 24• 4a' OH ALUMH a ROT. 74.8706 G PERIMETER 36' 67 SH AwrSL Telephone (581)2 ALUMN. P.G.T. Fax(hone (581) 7 E PERIMETER 3S SP SH ALUM ALUM P.G.T.ARCH F PERIMETER 24 43' OH ALUMN. AURAN. P.G.T.ARCH �._L . 1 .1 G PERIMETER 30- 48. SH ALUMN. ALUMN. P.G.T. I 1 -I ROOF BELOW CB) U U CU U = I��I l�I It 11 1I-i 1�1 I I = W U = = U • Constructed by • BATH BEDROOM Spengler C • L SUITE 2 BEDROOM Construction SUITE 1 I {_- __F. 382 N.E.3rd Ave. LINENCLOSET Delray Beach,Fl. 33444 cr 1 I _ ROOF BELOW • J t VEST. —TOD W ki ' Ia I Q nDOWN . ARU/L ri----: Project HER HIS Y c = Lot 1 CLOSET CLOSET STAIR W North Del-Ida Estates VEST. 1NELL _ /G Delray Beach,FL /1 SMOKER - . , -----ss r - - • CU r T ��r , �1 W LINEN — &,K () Date Revision Issue MASTER MASTER SITTING BATHROOM = COw SUITE AREA • Q SYNC �l 1 W L J II II (L3)c 4110 L J W ( I— ir— ii ii al 1-1 Designed S.L.RC. 14 II IF 41 (0 U Drawn S.L.A.S. r Checked S.L.R.C. 1 I I I ROOF BELOW 1 1 ROOF BELOW COI I Approved a I I 1 1 I�iI I-- Project No. 1 I Scale 114'=1'-0' ./r. Date 1-23-06 ...\ • N SECOND FLOOR PLAN Drawing A-3 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" • . 1 Architecture by . HDA Hunter Design Associates,Inc. 3601 N Dixie Hwy Suite 11 Boca Raton.Florida 33432 .. - 3O6 ROOF PEAK 0 Telephone (581)384-8745 Fax 750-4074 E-mail:• • U:huntdeatgibellsoulh.net • 12 In Association with SPANISH'S'ROOF TILES CoP E WOOD OUTRIGGER AND FASCIA Cope Ardlltacts.Inc _,�_ _ r, ,-. 2z-P 5RG.Hr. 80 N.E.4th Avenue `'L� _ d- .H—,—El _1 — _Li - _E- d -_d- _-I/..v .-4.. .,.......,,, Delray Beach.Florida 33483 Telephone (561)I-� tr yo.v 0 Fax(561)274-6707�7� I' `�]❑= I 1❑❑r�1 rOD I a�1_ a� t TEXTURE STUCCO ON BLOCK I ❑❑ DO oo ❑❑ ❑❑ 'w❑❑ —C'LL / ❑C ❑C "- �Aft ,._ SCONCE CAST STONE SILL TYP. �I 0111 -_ PARAPET ^^ I�I '— _ DECOR LOUVER �� SCONCE t41~10�i1^.-� - 120"SECOND FLOOR 0 �j\T�\\\\\\\ '� -1_I_I_I_I_I_I I_I_I_i_I_I_I_I_I 1 1 I I IAIAPI+'�r� 100'ERG.HT. l 1 ®ER OE TIER .. -, I�1❑❑trJ ��I 'ii4 �� `�� GARAGE DOOR SHUTTER APP. ❑❑ '.�♦�., OD WITH APPL TRIP CYPRESS ER® TI® ERTI 10❑ � I, �� I � POST LT. Constructed by . POST LT. ®® ®® ERR] 'L,' :,��4' _- ® R o Spengler TIER TIER ® CYPRESS WOOD GATE CYPRESS WOOD GATE 0-0"FIN fIRAEF.ONLY $ Construction . ,, , /-� Inc. CAST STONE COL SHUTTER AND DECOR CAST COL 382 NE.3rd Ave. SHUTTER DOGS LOT 1 Delray Beach,Fl. 33444 NORTH ELEVATION 3D'S ROOF PEAK SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 7th STREET VIEW _ 12 ^ Project : .„ SPANISH'S'ROOF TILES r, 7l-0' WOOD OUTRIGGER AND FASCIA Lot 1 ,,,,.-., el ^ ^.^,...r•^,e,,-.^'c-.^ - ^. r '�^�" . .,^sel + ,^,,^^^(' BRG-Hr. North Del-Ida Estates ' El ^d ^ d „El __ ^ .,, E e d = d d d _ d E d El .H El Elt..i - Delray Beach,FI. 1 1 r 1' - 2v- T�❑❑1E I ❑❑r I _ TEXTURE STUCCO ON BLOCK TEXTURE STUCCO ON BLOCK ❑❑ RR ❑❑ ❑❑I �❑ � �El El ❑❑II' ❑❑L, — _ ' ®H ` C El 19 R• • PARAPET ,a a' - SPANISH'S'ROOF TILES he-srV.1- 17-0-SECOND FLOOR . ,,MI1 nMn 1O-0"BRG.M. �. ,+r ^.. „ •-. ^�^�� I ^-^-^^ - Date RevlsioNlssue L_ ®® EHB ®® `❑❑I I❑❑ - as ER® ER® ®ER R - ER® ERER ®® 'W ❑❑ ❑❑ • GRILL WALL TIER ERER TIE -- _J tTr-P FIN.FLR-REF.ONLY CAST STONE COL m Designed S.L. RC. Drawn S.L A.S. Checked S.L R.C. LOT1 Approved Project No. EAST ELEVATION Dae v Date 8 1111-0505 SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" Drawing A-4 • Architecture by HDA Hunter Design Patov,Inc. • 3801 N Dixie Htvy Suite 11 Boca Raton,Florida T1497 Telephone (581)394-8745 u - 3PB ROOF PEAK E-mail: huntdesebeibouth.net - AA�1.�10010 A ;-- In Association with 1M0/MM10IM1�1010111 011k-- _...w�raM��wrMr0ru014.10 0r 0110ri;11P - COPE �T O s 10�111 .�t�M101M� ``.�y3 iViY��1��A~M1.1 6PANISM'S ROOF T0.ES iAiiiti i rwoompoir AI orki I� orkiwo wropi�ori, _ cDpeArchitects.ln� __ -iA��t 016101� 01Mi1 11 pm I�I�111 1111 I�I 1 WOOD OUTRIGGER AND FASCIA Bo ehIn aA�1�4_11011 Aial1l lit _ ___-. _ _ azGV Delray (5e Avenue 4 e3ios' 22,0'BRG HT. • —�� H r= H H H H r H H H H E1 H H H H H Fax(581)274-8707 2a-0' I I l i 1 l I 1 - TEXTURE STUCCO ON BLOCK — ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ TEXTURE STUCCO ON BLACK OD EICI OD DO PARAPET BEYOND t� �, ij - -J SPANISH'S'RCOF TILES • 12-0'SECOND FLOOR C`1H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H - H SCr>.Rrc 1 1 J Co , Doa l❑C❑❑1 1 ❑❑ RH Constructed by ❑❑ POST LT- Spengler s k ❑❑n❑ i ‘t IIj ❑� - 15 Construction _ a.v FIHFLR.REF.ONLY Inc. CAST382 STONE SILL7`rP. Delray ay Ave. CAST STONE COL GRILL WALL Delray Beach,Fl- 33444 LOT1 WEST ELEVATION - SPANIS ROOF TILES 3aS ROOFOOF PEAK SCALE: 1/4"=1.-0" �... _ Project : .,,.....y.....r- Lot 1 WOOD OUTRIGGER AND FASCIA North Del-Ida Estates r .. r d^r,-,r,nr r.,,...-,^n^-S e,,,.`+e^,.+ ^n- ^+^^ 27dBRG HT. � HH HHHHHHHHHH 4P Delray Beach,Fl. _ 2aa r❑❑I I❑❑1 10❑1 i❑❑J TEXTURE STUCCO ON BLOCK TEXTURE STUCCO ON BLOCK ❑❑ C ❑❑ ❑❑ 124r SECOND FLOOR • r,^ .. r,r,r,r, 1a-0BRG.HT. Date Revision/Issue• `�� H^^H^hH H H HUH^^U \ s--\_� H H H H H H try • I I r I t 1 q b a. `— sd J ❑❑ ❑ no ifir-Ntr POST LT. POST LT. a is � 4�• ❑❑ • ❑❑ ❑C - _' - L CYPRESS WOOD GATE CYPRESS WOOD GATE - _ a-0'FIN.FLR.-REF.ONLY ' /1=1 • CAST STONE SIU.TYP. CAST STONESILLTYP. P DraWrl� S.L AS. Checked S.L R.C. LOT 1 Approved Project No. . SOUTH ELEVATION Scale „4•-'' Date 8-11-05 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" Drawing A-5 • . . _. .. _ • . .. .._.. .__ ..._....„ . . • . , r . . . . . • •. • • . . • - • . . kA. la . • • . - REVISIONS MY . . . . . • ' il . . . .. • • . • . . • • - . • • . /Id . li0 • .CD . 10.13.041 Edalt triangle,&pa Plan 1122"6.31.08 FlvadRndllIdg.&34"1"87te • t • . . - . • . •• . • • . • • • • • . - - - . . • . . • • .• .' . MATE. R1AL-SCHEDULE • • • • • LOT 4,.......... .81.5710 MI16.' %atlii..\/4."VVV•-•" -----.e.: 4464 / -N/-,..nms .4 illillb.- ,n . :SITE DATA, RESIDENTIAL gut 11 - . fp .........„ ,_....---4=.--... •-•• •44.74 !:.-,••••• , •-: r, %•41%. ., . - 1 : 1) . • .- 1 11.11111W11116011111,1011111 i 41,CV..(0, ...„‘„,,,,..%,..',..4,:ii;-. ...;,-*,,,,/,-..' Ar& A.Total lot ara• ' 11,780 Sq.11t • 4a... . , • 85124°271 Sq.FL411•54a ' • ty. Key Botanical/Common Name Size vor.,00,--....ormarr4r-om . Nii:liri.N0,..._. 4, r 4*-k ....•. - -,..,- i‘1%. ..,4:7. V.14 B.Sanctum,parkIng,walks.atom Mc.-- • 1111116.1.21111017411F \V____,./''.:•.*,,,,„....../.4. 714, ..,„,..4..... ......16,411‘.1/41:-`2-.__ 'Allifijr "A-4-1kt.‹,:1481.1"•;..;,-•;•-4 '. ' C.Total pervious ans(-Arli) ' - • D.Anm al tree's&groundcovor(REQUIRED) • . 3 Rapt• Ftnysionaa alata/FL royal palm.101009100 25-3.0(tbry.wd. ' • • . . . • • - D3C x.20) - •1 Pap-d Plychosaima&eons/Aloander pelat LBO. 12-148.01341010 • 12 Rom lialiallad•(nod:eau:aria:03/Travelers palm 10-12ttoastit • . • . . 0'SETBACK -•• 1/4. ...,....1111) E Arse of trio:shrub&atliroundoovara prOvIderd ' 1576 Soft ' ' 9 Cdt• Cocoloba dverallollat Pigeon plum trea 12x6ft . . • • . r__ ___,.......7.._____,.________. ....__.......__......___,.....,...1 • ,. ,..,......„.„..z.,,. • • F.Native n*151211°0 REQUIRED(Fe Dx.23) 318 1 •r •- 3 Uer La28/14/0•1110a Indica/Crape myytle tree,red 12253. . ii I i G.31•14.vagetaban PROVIDED • 590 1144Ft . 1 Bat• &nem&Wombat Gumbo limbo tree 143811. ' if- ill.. • . . . H.'.Total number 03 84924 trees '3 llo to removed) . • - I • 44\411 if . ' t Total'amber of REQUIRED trees ' 5. 40 Fb• Flew baniamlnar Ftp• 30-3411'3•81froc. • • • 1 • • • • •. i i .._... .,. 0 a A-250044.K) • • 50 J3 ..18S111116 voluble/Waxjacinkwo 15•39.020`cc. . - t . J.Total number of peas PROVIDED . • • '24 • • • . . • . . i't•„.N3A,11\/n. . .. • 52 Oh Croton,bravo . . ..,_ • ' ... . • •I 1 %Is zir (J•H•I•any addt boss) „ K.Total number d nada,Imes REQUIRED ' 4 .205 Vil• •Potypodum'cop./Wart fern 8-16.661Toc. ' • I •' POOL 28 Ern Euganla myrtitolla/Eugenia 38-42%Zoc. • • • 1 ' • . t . ' . L Total numbei of nalhae Imo PROVIDED 3 . • 30 Cr Chryobalanus Icaco/Cocopturn . 24•44(62'oe. • • r j„....Ty"....' ' - 1 N'Air) .. •- • 2 Illg-ald• BougaInvaaa std, It ' . - ' • • • •• le • POOL •••...e.,414a,,,,, • ' CO 2 Cl-bm Cordytine Innings'black maold7 Hart 0 plant 3.5•41t,inkt • . • , . Eovit . . .• . • 28 Ps-x PhNodendron Xanadu 10.39462.00. - .' ." . . • . . . I ,,,:z‘v 13, . 30 Hp-d• Kemal patan3,dr&OrA.6tabusti . . . . . • • 12 Id• Trap:mom dan4loirlesf Fakahatchee woo 30"39.8317-cc. . . , . . .L: :..., /417. W •• . • . . . . - • • . Ir.• • 18 R-b Roglia tvitonnial Purple aroma 21129.©200 • . • • ' . . • , t <Lili .0. - . • . . • • .. • . . POOL r. - • . .. 4114 . • . . - - - 1.6. Ranting sok.see specs.&&tab • .. 412 I -4/1-aly 7- . - • • . ' Mulch,Imo specs.&dotala • - •" ce1 - . 1 b • 0 • ...- • • - Sod,sold floratam • . • o ' . . . . I I C • r • - d. ----••• : • .. . • • •• , • 0 1 0 i • : . • • •• • IQ - 0 -- • • ROTE•-DINA.AV**want tolerant cv nave plant materiels,por SFW3112 • vz w • Aita - . lc . . ..,-4. .. .. . . . . • UY (6±- . • CO -- . . - X•4•Cape 142/11-tir. • -. . . . ' . '309 • . . - • • - . . • . • al I- h , . .. • . . . . . . ... . . ,... 2". • • . • • • • tiwij) LIP.S 1 • W 03 " LANDSCAI%NONCE - 1 10.4. • • • • • ' b.>. . - - " $ ots 5 L...••••••••/..111.IL//I.ow Lem.sow.1wo Irmrsla/ealfl.C.*Mummein Ar-yd., ..".. -_::::331 • • . • . _. . ....,-.........,..........,.....18,,pa...r..M.0•Aa. • • ' 111.112 3 • • t .. '. 3-•11.......111•••••••••••...a,/I 0.•••....11..........••••• • • ................11.1.....•••1. ' ' ' . • P ril--Li- . , . . . - . 10...1.../........tpla...t•t./..14.plasod•..1./...31...t. .• . • . ' ' I .c) CO • 6/461.4 ohoustall mks prolde.m.a Or goonfer au Spaciamigrral swag rill lodeirMes4 by re t b ',. . - • . c......i .••••...*Qualic•ai.2••••........•6•••1••••••••pid...11•1....• • • • ' ' . to.....1.13 6mapeasalal•Fs ihs actual qumtida.los•as Oa Om.Tiopims.okapi:I:6w amis.. ' . .• r% lii ct.w . r-.3 •... • re . - 7 • • ,...ta mar.Pea ewes Aall to W.A..eat.313.L.4,3.3333.3 ni.. :••• ' ' b ill• - • - . 0 , . .. . I M IS '''t< a....•• ...haw .:. • •• • - • • • 11 . ' • 0 ' Z Ce cot)m6 i A lies.a..al Os.4.wriii.•.....A.1.•••[.•••••.L MI a......•••••• • •- al li ..- 1. • • - ki • .. . i__Y------.---e---.-_ • - • *Mew.*ifturikor • . . . S.MaillilfitNiii.liall 1.•chwa./.116..ed Irma/dela Soil Jab ramotNatiF1.1.4•10•AGIao...“ • . • ' ' • I...4a 0•1.4.4.•••/...0 rob*/Wpm el to•WY.Si.....•i•a Va.. • .. . .' I GATE p a5 .4. Li4g• • ' • 1___ . • • . . .....ata Ini...1•10.•...•or ow Ugh.bas.eh.6/11marl oa•lys.li be Irsrk.1 WY. • • - - • !.'6,91 niolorru•Pralpirlog awl Irarlvd Im dm oop r thirMaing adis.14/Vpir/aM POGrampcisarli . • • . 1.1%ad wit mica nor/mind asel • I / ' It.III.I.It.t.NA&krtiliaar Mull Is attytiot to all*Ask.I.,....a...............e.M.I. •' I .GATE- " - Aa 9 ::-7.-1. 1.1.1.1..11111ili,A • i - • - • • • . sa.,../44/.....(2./.3)....1...11•01.21p1.•1.1.............. •• • . • ECM.&NEW PLANT MATERIALS,LOCATED WfrHIN THE .• .41. - • mormararm. SIGHT TRIANGLE.ARE TO BE lArdNTA1NED 421 30'OVERALL HEIGHT • .•.m.,,,, ...,s.- 1 : WIT.' 1 I - • • • •, IS rodat/*Us ruabtrukIed a MA.Nrer.dais,r•&Mous A.$1.M AM..kds run "- • mai.).5AlehriNth.aerIch Imo mrLar,...3'..%M.......,..,....",..47.•,...“...04. - . • . • • ' ...mi.MO CW/1E:SS h1/11.1 SHALL tiE WILIZED ONSIE 111.0.WCT. •177 - I it 1 LEAL il 09A Ank . . . . . , I.M Omar rullIspluAmir...Vals*/*Lia ray wermr.k.ImsfAra Shnimad haerrI.I.IIMaI • - ' • . I 44 . MI .' ' T:r I tr91 . 1m- - • • . • ....... . . • Sway Ns/ay uo/Let ormar.11/ialaimM 6 34flosiat Na awaltripsiMkplaard•eu omp • • i • -010401% • '• impok 14 Arra rwil.60 altd.pl.. ' P• • ' - O.a makrial•A.A.&•Aused-la Lasmilbuiy Ale ph.earA.AA mu.mow All AY pock..Illl',utak I a an • • fil,.• .11 . • • .,-,..7-. kobtli.•••..ix•Motors 41.:14 Va laWX•Yaq art ibarriot as 244../.../.Caram$14.11•Mr . • I ' • • ' • I ' Jammu V goy sedErM/4.4.../Morn..Marsa• - ram...-. I& •. . - • • . - It Mt.'s ilg...•laissr.•.1....1,or wok i•i.....ugrart.11.4.14..r1•1•11.1a • • .RIMI.-11A.lIt.,.,. .1*'. I f,5 C> - . • • . stairlaMAMma..r•Ildr pal.a....0 6.s.....od.a.... 1•ire‘s.../MM....,",I. . . i• wig...co/Ye lasperruner.martriam.9.1.14.0‘.11rorm,i1Maapmaarmor aball I* • 11.v.--,=-•MIFIN••••• •• •••-=..,. I . . . ' . / . • . woes:WS*/II sruta•palms lanai*.arairla A a*Ova,/Yu µrm.porl..1.1a Llama.Yu+• Var '' .Troy, I . . . . _ . ..".....k...p.mly.1.4..s..a.a..1.1.{•.....il•4414.0.1.94.1... ' • • ' • '' . •- .---W arx • . IL Mid skirl Ix-Rnewae:trEltaa MaVat woad.Sedatall/Mow.1.....*44-0.4.a k.et - V. • • Tr:fq, I 1 • • - .. - .• . . • • Jobrivoa.rhrs.A.or litiMa A orapirt 64-6 kalliar rub bi.air/hcha may VIDIts.pe 1.1ON.IL Sod ' . . 3, i I I pr; ' a,q,,,, 1 . - • • 1.1.8...6••41,1.11rismafrok,v.i...11.a.Oca.sa.b....1 sm...a Ude ' •• • • • ' • I • . • ...at Mar miMalsira. ' • -• • - • 114"•____ • - .z..................•........k...•••c.......•••.....60..".2•.k......................,4.1 • - ..-- • eliri-.....42 ----..--i 4111P • . . • • Z i ...fair Ara...NA.elsolorglal merged.Er....4...risers Arsa,,, IN.I•mk•I'Irl. .: I „Itt. . /-r-\• • 0 pa rarrairrOcs mammary kr•gmaiired p.m,fara.S.Ms.i.....ropc.rar atirl teN r.4;9. -,Aift-111.1y44,1101p... - . - . ' • ..0 LL . ...lift of 6•••••-11•11.1..p.m.star%.12....easer Is ela.L........vams. • . • ' • • . . : l' . 14- a • Utr.SET'.....-.J.::::„1 '.... . gf /0-4114.. 111M111 . . . , • . . . 13.1..m.sts.,1.1.0.1.4.a•1111•....ian.440.0..........pa I." "F.±.4. •0118 . - ' . :/2.oilz,z.re,,,:ti,144444:441 /4,... ' • ' * • .../.11....0 WI../..4.0....41a los.111•••11..... • Ilk • • 11..11a•Plawoct.i.oa ie.f..1 la 1141.....o. • . • ' 1 10.,.,:e Ars. fo,,,,„,,,,, ,,, . --"I _... ,,-;;Ii . /./40 lip • .. • . IL M rode/art M..within r et IeVed rad.,pre log1e lacy,..........1.....or.ie,vaL W.7.Trfi.V,Af I y Me' • • • • .. . . - . - - Cs) • g- • . ..„... ,,,,„. • • . • . • • . , • , . . • • . . .. m ,... . . • • .1 . .• . . • •. #. ....,111 .---4,40,.. oR• _ i . • • . . • • • tv• 4 - COURT • \ 1 • , . • • - • - LOT Z.i.LOT 'I .. . _ • - \ . . . . . - a) CI • - . ' • - I ,z7........... . . . . . .. . • - . . • 4,0 I- . • • • - - . I •/ 4-1 Ilk- . . . . • ',617 • .•• • . • • - /12k • Y... ' ' .. ' . . . *E.as•••••• -- . ..,;.?.A, Ilslabrill 11.• - • 1:Z.' .M. • iii -t•-••••=ta 16".. 7-1' • ••Aim. 1,41)....1, - . * C ca %ter to......3 - -., • - .• ''...... . tigi 1 :IOCK 9 IEL .. • • .. • • I,. ria • .. • .......• ..-•---• - •• •-. WEE i Wr• ' • . . 0 CL. .• . -,.1 tr„ r...........A. Shrubs • i_ . ;ZItl.',.N. . ,..•., vr, \ • . . • . a...AI . . -ilitastsf- -..--.Arr. 0 ,1111MallM* imago ._, 11111.1W,AiNIIIIII ,....., \ . • . i an. • . Groundcovers • '1/41 -•-• •- - - S. Iiiii.*-,. --- •••,_ v,„•,... : . . • - - . . . 0) gm . „S . ' • 81.11T N......... ..„, • • - - *E ...1 Si • . .•.:-= • . EXIST.BIDE 'r• •, . - - . • ...WO.••••••.44 • • • • •. . . .. - .•••...••••4•se.. 14...../.• . . • . • 05 LI 1-1-I .4...., . - • Cy •••••PP••••...•• . • 44/ • . . Lt.=ra...74••• ....AIII, .1)..6,.••••we vv./•1 ••••••••••••it...a Iasi altoalla..•am... . - . • • /7°2 )-. • . . .• • . • .1...WOO 4..1.4...a.• . 1.wia- ..,.: ,„,,,,, _ AWAY lel MAY lava Ila..1.11.••• . . • . \,........ • Vara..Pr/.•.• ... . ....r. ...../...•I mu.•••• . ...... . • , . , ).,.._AIN .....r......7.•at•••••••••• •.44.• . . . - . • a ' . ••../...ow.•••• - . ' """"' j4I'll PT,is..ataa•aaluad•ac.& C afti•A . • • . ' • ' .. ILI-0- NE . • O. • . . . •••.•••••....., I . - modaeaa A,Mad AAA A.AAA.al. • . • PM... ...I.••••• ••••• .. ' (P••• k • . , • . . • _:..5... CO '5 ° • ..•••••.. ir4 -.3 a ••boo••••••• Ilk, • • . • . - NE 7TH STREET •. - • . ......... .1-.i.7,i77,-,--,,,,,i•...,..F.- . . . . . • . . . v.wad•••••• ..-•'••Lk..... . . . - . . . . •':,. ,intilP•i..._,.. •aaael•ala••WO • • . . . - . . • • . - •1.,-......' t, . I•WA Mb.Itra C • • • • . • AC••12,./delve II.I./........••... . . . . . • ..... Stralght Trurak Palms -_q----------------- ----_---------------------- . .t DRAWN ./.•.•*W..*v•.•a•6.4.•3•or••••.,••••••/•••••...". . • • . • •••I....,boo I••61 or&WA.Am..••5 AAA-A..4,...•••......• • . . • • . •AM ea•II,WA.obi-...NI • • • • 01110K10 . • • ., . • . ' • Trees • - . . • • . . . . • ' , • . Wale • . ' . . • . - • • • • . . • •. • . • • . • • ' . • . LOT 1 - . • . . • . . . . .- - •. • . .- . •,...1%0' • oran ND. '. . . . • • • • -. Q5.9.15 r• . • AIMI'd •. . . . - . • ., . •. . . . ... . r- . • . . . . • • - -•-• SITE FLAN . .. .• • • • • DRIVE • . . - . . • • - . 1 - • - • W---- --........\\I • .... • . . • - • - - - . . • • . . - • . • • --_-,-..-.- . . SCALE 1/8"m•-•V-0" •. . . . • . . . .,., , . • - • • • - r. . - . . _, • • - 2 - - ... •• - • . . - . • • • . • . . . . . . • OP • • • •• *. • .11 • . - . . • . . • . „- 1, • . . .... . . . • • . . . . .' ... • ' • - - 411 RNV1110NR I sr - • a - • . . 10-13.05 6gh1TA24710.Spa Plan • • • _ a -• 122D-05RwdSita Plan • • - ... •L. _ ��dj- .�. .... p.... • .31A11 RAW Eeld7.1 Silo Dm." . . . T IRRIGATION LEGENDS - Ten 170•11Pww.614.seas paws ea wags jf' ��00.� Eno 67D•72 Pary.Sap b••1•'•�Pa4 paws rehap • ''• _ � - ' RImaW Ito edrrMe.rbWar M. -�______ , e' -. . . t a • I , • tans aWarr.PC SM. .S' t •, C� • . POOL • WATER 3vCW aria,Sad wily Imam►aka ' .• i • • 1 • ' NDTE:Y.hEpAMA.rddbp Y.a•bw1YEDWlk Pllml'tYM• I .° POOL. .a�._+�F�1_ - • . /u.abap.a,"rrorblocaw.ahl.hemcw.mramai. -- • ---- DECK . CO . IRRIGATION NOTES ■ - ° - *law _ • u . . _ .. ot1�p AabndklaiPtlmSydrA • / _I�5 —..• • ' _�1 • - O V f7 N . . WYnrn..dlaap • - • ''Aw .... dd • • Pre..d.repir QNrbplae) - ' , v+41 .„ . ' hi LL• a..pspYOY.wtlY.pmbeO.r.FWYK6YY.r{.OIOd..Cvstlap.p _ I ✓cr..daar•.m • li—a.:_-=.1-..____D3 _.. ... ... P. QU ad.. LUG pea dime b.•plrpypp..rr..rYa�TIIIRLIMALLSEYOrMVO1&ADa > - ' . • 1 GOLDi - IU` . • Nmm0 FORT.EN.DiLi. - f Y �j 1wJP.-t - OS L>. arml.r.rrr.pry®mrs�l.rr.+rN.rarll..ram. .---..rrr......rdrmarar•wrprrbr.r V U ' - V Te.r.lr.Or Owe.l.l.r..rrddrpar.a Corry Yr.Y•pdpb Imaa 11sna.s.s.nrbrnaaa•Ylpp iJpd.d.e,b.pnab.rrr.ar PY.a..aapYr.Yr a.cal. ®„y�,yyrYh,Y.rrmcapb.rp"r kY.Yan raGlN WC* CIis ll.▪ nnaA.aMapepYv4O.YaYt P _ ___..NMI __-_ N A16CnIDAC*wig 6MPrld.eSwlas.a'.namrbbW mpmo�. • �7 ` - •liT j� �,1C1 card.Yr4Ybrc.ma.ap.Yro.a.PWtrYlaraYap m.rYYY.m / J \__ L 1 __ AlE j t ( GATE 'IIl �•/ Q W y - b.MYSY.umllaO.Y6oiibeYlchYaaatWWOC.Y.rMaYlOta TptrM.iYapsWrrYYObpat*monYFMWrNna..r• LL —�a- ` • - rLmnYbraba.rdbO....YbMS..bW.4....e.d - / I 1 ' j W ZH TaruefRdWp4 dSYSOMP P.r.a.ari.nPKA>•r WYe..sdWf. . �� 11 ;� - 1 ! Q IU 'Q .a.dB.Oira6.4rpdnrO..Wra�OrYc..ab.n.WW.r - _ I �� aarl•o� apWMbard.4adbf o••.Y.lesYr.d..a.........n�YYr.WItl j .I Vlmb.4.WWw+d..a.aOOb PI...aww......rde:b..wram • (I C� 'd ;..I Io . wawa Yal.alaYpeadoEwa O.paL.Ya l..wadgadb4le..0"......- pa.r.rO.pm.p YYln rae.d lrepbnYO•Od.ppW6rr.Yd • • l:A Wrp.r bar apgbnpYn Wawa.Ems...eYaNYi..W.blbPdo. - • qp..fnlY.rnY.mlawe...s+.roro.aawn.tam.brtr.Y.InEa. • Ao.oran►n....0....rar.•vrr.xnn rm PawpYw......++'NYoa - I /I` - •I�l 1 b.Ya.c / - • . od...b.Y,.pa I :. • d 1 I ,. — Caoo lYWYaatoarahbagtroglIV.id^IbMd."pIYOp....yadn -J , MHO pp.0 f babr440YW.n Wa...b/.....04..YOp - / i PV.rtrO•...s....4.r YWbM0.4Wtlro..Lmdb.a ( 1 r e�� ' (,,�,`,{�,` I , • N ape OMtab.WYhmania.aaW WI gods,gad pdmbd.pnao...edYma PopO.p.Atra J.S..nprmvin Wlber hdpYr.n.dYl.nan,bls l..J { i` • ' ii#1412) ..a•►DaioQe..Wb•1V 4.1.caY4ta. k.....b..4.a.m.aw.a. i �•- •"�•�t I I Pa.eJY.addD•s•..•I.aariwa.a•dYaat.WA be W«adramawL awwe CONTROL SYSTEM •- - - --- -• • 4� I ' , a - -2 - . Wlydr.glp.r bYptrrd....a trpp.a.bfnLWa.hY pybnama Rmmadd q.w.rrr.m.avrmYua.o.pbmmYo.euan.wY.hr. •I ___ _ -_ _f ° �:�� C e4paYadr.lYha.bp.rgY.L wnrb....;Ydmnb. ,.-OO.OD'S•TBACK- �''� ^ _� s� �! - S. .. l U. • •Eb.h.Yhd eeaw P.d.rbbtliMp..Y.errrbBONIa W..bdabaNabraNV y.aVY WOVIVO W.boYJYY r YWd.4 b bmWr. ' ` / �' { ' ~� __ �'. WA In MR.ale SCH Aa MC.biY..md hn Yn T*ha r ton M • I •�.c^;. r r ' �_ _ __ __ _ • ppeflO,rhYOl..rdroYbeKYrrbOR34CW Yd PYCiP .,.... . .................W AaLMirDRW.Wn— 1. i d ' • Pp..rb b•dn b rdpr.bp NM*.n W.rpb Imo r Yr.NYp / BRIGK mg m.hC�•aa.d+YYwsbbarmmcrwrrn.plrrmbm.b«4rb' _ YOTOR - rYfra.mp..p.r4ratrtrYadri.wTL WprphYbelp'OYrfpYa. \, • Y.Yard ydYr.rdAp LOT .' OT/1 i� N. , COURT . a.dlaa.rMarlrad.d.pvm.IMdbd..Y.p.dahYdrn EA d.o>r0a • VALVES . 1L---.-_ - r.r....•� . • - - .. . r..'pap•db1og.JO pad ... A ... .. • r+c.+I.nwp.Ya.vr.N.maw..dYr.Yr.aan-- -PwP...aP...w �� t a sraeuants - np.aYW N.ropbr YYaW beIPAb..raYSr.ard.•la ` • • a{6n.balerpadm.aonprYYryratrn.tYnpp..Yd..h.aap. RAW aENSOR 1 Yraq.n.npYla,m,lecp.a..n.rbar.p..raar.d.p.p..daa•adr - 1•lYd'ph.am.IWrrlWd.al.... a“....�ddmaRW.pP•aia T.17 . ■A A/ WI WI p P5y4.apT hod*el mks r.rY taPk..d..10.h.b..dabL..WO Vill : .errlaalan.db/b WdY.gM1.r1 r I 0 CK 2 - I 4 I #4 I. • . - �►_ j_ ' _— —_— ' - c� , ddm(m'�6a', • Y.. . - _� 81.BT y•bT.SIDEWALK _____ �. :1 • J-' • a E W $Q . j • • . - (.........„.../ - - a Z 32 • 8W �• ." �'� N NE 7TH STREET ' »<`"�' . . �z• . • 11.1.4/ 4-.--- . • __q__ ____ _ - - _ _ - - -____- -... _....___- -_________________-__ - DRAWN Ail . - • a • wn • . •- - • :Z.2la, • - ......l.\ • � .... LOT 1KELM b1 • SITE PLAN -r \• _/ SCALE:1/8"=,1'-0 DRIVE • r t D[LRAY BfACM .. ` DLIRAYBEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD glik MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT gilt 1993 1993 3001 2001 Agent: Andrew Spengler Property Owner: Coastal Property Holdings, LLC Property Address: 111 NE 6th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District (Formerly 107 NE 6th Street) HPB Meeting Date: March 15, 2006 COA: 2006-156 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a new two-story residence and landscape plan located at 111 NE 6th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 4, Block 2, North Del-Ida Estates Replat, zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). The property, located in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, previously contained a contributing one-story, single-family dwelling and detached, single-car garage. During its meeting of August 3, 2005, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and recommended approval for the demolition of the existing structures based on the fact that they appeared to have very little architectural or historical merit. The subject property was previously a part of six (6) non-conforming lots which have since been reconfigured and replatted into four (4) conforming lots. The subject lot measures at a width of eighty-two feet (82') and a depth of one-hundred twenty feet (120'). The Staff report for the replat, which was reviewed at the HPB meeting of June 15, 2005, stressed that the layout and design of the four (4) proposed single family homes `....will be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to-ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area.' In September 2005, the applicant submitted the first proposals for two of the four properties (Lots 1 and 2). The applications then went through Staff's review process, at which time comments were generated directing the applicant to revise the proposals. The applicant met with Staff in October 2005 to review the submittals. Those applications have been before the Board and failed to meet the required review criteria and guidelines. The applicant is now before the Board for the review of Lot 4, containing a two-story, single- family residence. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of the construction of a two-story, single-family residence containing 5,452 total square feet, approximately 4,242 square feet of which is under a/c. The building foot print calculates to approximately thirty-four percent (34%) of the property. 1 1`1 NE 6`'Street;C0A 2006-156 HPB MeetTnt Mich "3,2006 The design takes a combined inspiration from Resort Colonial Revival, Plantation and Bahamian architectural styles. The concrete block dwelling is proposed to be clad in a smooth stucco and finished off with a standard seam, mill finish metal, hip roof at a 4/12 pitch. Decorative cast stone columns and trim are proposed throughout as are wood outriggers and fascia. The overall fenestration consists of impact-resistant, aluminum framed windows of differing sizes and proportions. All are 4/1, single hung and contain louvered shutters and shutter-dog hardware. The proposed shutter material was not specified on the plans. The main (South) elevation, which faces NE 6th Street, contains a large, two-story element measuring forty feet, six inches (40'6") in width, with a one-story element which juts out to the front. Tucked behind the front, one-story mass, is a one-story, two-car garage and motor court measuring approximately twenty-two feet (22') in width from the sidewall of the central, two- story mass. A twenty-six foot, six inch (26'6") wide, two-story porch, supported by large, cast- stone columns, spans the majority of the front elevation. An aluminum, cross-braced rail will be located between the smaller scaled, second-story posts. The main entry consists of a set of French doors which are copied to the elevation directly above, as well. The garage doors are to be made of metal and imitate the railing design. The side elevation to the west has an overall depth of seventy-eight feet (78'). The two-story mass measures fifty-nine feet, six inches (59'6"), a portion (26'6") of which shows the complete two-story wall plane. The two, one-story elements to the front and rear of the elevation assist in breaking up the large two-story mass. The rear (North) elevation contains approximately forty-feet, six inches (40'6") of an unbroken, two-story wall plane. The one-story wall plane is continuous with the one-story element to the west, which extends the elevation by approximately twenty-two feet (22'). A set of French doors flanked by fixed panes of the same configuration are located towards the east of the elevation, and topped with an awning of an unspecified material. The side elevation to the east is mainly comprised of the complete two-story mass. The profile of the one-story element to the front, which is located on the opposite elevation, is evident. However, it does not provide any relief of the two-story mass. The landscape plan shows a fence to be used around the perimeter of the lot. However, details regarding the fence height and type were not submitted. Additionally, a swimming pool is proposed for the front yard area. It is to be located on the front (30') and side (10') setbacks. The overall measurements are twenty eight feet (28') along the front setback and fourteen feet, six inches (14'6") along the side setback. A deck of an unspecified material will surround the swimming pool. The driveway, which leads from NE 6th Street to the "motor court" located in front of the garage, is to be made of brick. Proposed colors are as follows: oStucco— Mellow Yellow (Soft Yellow) oShutters—Blue Jean (Muted Sky Blue) oTrim, Rails, Outriggers, Columns— Chantilly Lace (White) 217 111 NE&m Street;Car 2006-156 HPB Meetinc March 13,2006 PROJECT ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Objective A-12.1 of the Comprehensive Plan, offers that to assist the residents of the City in maintaining and enhancing their neighborhood environment, the City shall take steps to ensure that modifications in and around the neighborhood do not lead to its decline, such as those described in the following policies. Policy A-12.4 The City will provide planning and technical assistance to implement neighborhood-supported initiatives aimed at preserving the character of existing residential areas. Such assistance may involve the formulation of regulations that would limit size and scale of new homes to be consistent with the existing structures within a defined neighborhood, and analysis of the housing inventory to determine if the area qualifies for designation as a historic district, and similar measures. Design Elements LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7) and (E)(8)(a-k), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The Board shall consider the following: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non- contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance of any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of height, front façade proportion, proportion of openings (windows 'and doors), rhythm of solids to voids on front facades, rhythm of buildings on streets, rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections, relationship of materials, texture and color, roof shapes, walls of continuity, scale of building, directional expression of front elevation. The following criteria have not been met: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. The overall height of the building as submitted measures approximately thirty feet, six inches (30'6") to the ridgeline of the two-story element, whereas the one-story elements measure to fourteen feet, six inches (14'6") and sixteen feet, six inches (16'6"). Overall, the height is within the maximum allowed (35') in terms of zoning regulations; however, it is not .,;t 111 NE 6''Street;COA 2006-156 HPB Mee:mg March 15.2006 appropriate within the context of the historic district in which it is located. Its inappropriateness lends to the very prominent and large, two-story mass, as the two- story elements are not stepped back and, rather, provide full, two-story wall planes on all elevations. (b) Front Facade Proportion: The front façade of each building or structure shall be visually compatible with and in direct relationship to the width of the building and to the height of the front elevation of other adjacent or adjoining buildings within a historic district. The front facade proportions of the proposal have no compatible relation to the adjacent buildings within the historic district. The front facade is essentially, a forty-one foot wide (41'), two story mass with a twenty-two foot wide (22') one story element to the west. Due to the expansive width, together with the height, the proposed dwelling is not in proportion with its existing surroundings, which create the historic district in which the property is located. (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. Del-Ida Park Historic District is an area made up of simple homes with minimal scale and mass. While the actual proposed doors and windows may be compatible with those that exist in the area, the amount needed to create the necessary visual compatibility is excessive due to the amount of wall space provided. Additionally, the main entry is made up of a set of French doors, which is not an appropriate door style/type to be used at such a location. French doors should be reserved for secondary entryways. Lastly, the proposed "C" window needs to be modified to a more proportionately appropriate window, as its lower sash creates an awkward appearance with the upper, fixed sash. (d) Rhythm of Solids to Voids; Front Facades: The relationship of solids to voids in the front facade of a building or structure will be visually compatible with the front facades of historic buildings or structures within the district. The proportions of the proposed solids and voids are not of concern when looking solely at the structure. However, when looking at the amount of each, and comparing them to that of the surrounding historic district, there is no visual compatibility. (e) Rhythm of Buildings on Streets: The relationship of buildings to open space between them and adjoining buildings shall be visually compatible with the relationship between historic sites, buildings, or structures within a historic district. The streetscape rhythm in this area is low-scale. The second-story elements would need to be greatly revised in order to mitigate their impact on the Del-Ida Park Historic District. This would include incorporating second-story elements into a predominately one-story structure should the applicant not find a compatible solution that is entirely one-story. (f) Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Projections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with the prevalent architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. While two-story porches may exist in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, it would only be found on other infill structures. The size of the first-story columns lends to the mass of the porch. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The .'1 NE 6`` Street,COA 2006-156 HPS tvieeting March 15,2006 aluminum railing on the second-story porch should be revised to wood, as this would be a more appropriate material. Additionally, no material has been specified for the shutters; therefore, Staff recommends that the shutters also be made of wood. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. In order for new construction to be compatible in any existing neighborhood, the existing structures must at least be considered in terms of style, size, scale, and mass, the importance of which expands when speaking in the context of a historic district. When reviewing the subject application, it is not evident that this has occurred as the proposal has not taken the historic district into consideration. (k) Directional Expression of Front Elevation: A building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures, and sites in its directional character, whether vertical, horizontal, or nondirectional. While the directional expression of the front elevation is apparent, its large scale is excessive and not visually compatible with the Del-Ida Park Historic District. Additionally, the location of the swimming pool in the front is of great concern as it would detract from the character of the neighborhood. There are no other known properties with swimming pools in the front yard. The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that: oNew additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (Standard#9) oNew additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. (Standard# 10) The intent of Standards 9 and 10 have not been taken into consideration and are essential in creating a compatible environment in the historic districts. Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines • o For buildings where additional height is allowed, stepping back the upper stories may help to minimize the difference as viewed from the street. oAll infill must be compatible with the surrounding buildings and yet must be differentiated from the historic building stock. oThe height of any new building should be similar to those of other buildings along the streetscape. oThe new construction should be compatible with the width of the surrounding buildings. o The relationship of new construction adjacent to significant historic resources can either enhance or detract from the historic setting of the district. oThe character of the massing should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. oRoof forms and pitch should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. 111 NE 6`"Street.COA 2006-156 HPB Meeting March 15,26Q6 The above noted guidelines have been pointed out because their intent has not been met or taken into consideration. A look at the historical patterns within the Del-Ida Park Historic District might give more insight on complying with the above noted guidelines in the context of the subject district. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION While the proposed two-story, structure is an attractive design, it does not belong in the Del-Ida Park Historic District as submitted. Del-Ida Park was one of Delray's earliest planned communities and, in 1988, was one of the City's first designated historic districts. It is predominantly made up of one-story structures possessing a minimal size, scale, and mass. It must be reiterated that the property consisted of six (6) non-conforming lots which have been reconfigured and replatted into four (4) conforming lots. The Staff report for the replat stressed that the layout and design of the four (4) proposed single family homes '....will be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area.' This requirement has not been met. The current submittal does not meet the intentions of the components used to review for compatibility, appropriateness and compliance. Therefore, based on the analysis above and throughout the staff report, positive findings cannot be made with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for a new dwelling at 111 NE 6th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness for a new dwelling at 111 NE 6th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Continue the Certificate of Appropriateness for 111 NE 6th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District with direction, based upon a failure to make findings with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, with the following suggestions: 1. That the correct cardinal directions are noted on each elevation; 2. That the "C"window is revised to provide a more proportionately appropriate window; 3. That specifications regarding types of fences to be used are submitted; 4. That all hardscaping materials are specified on the site and landscape plans; 5. That the swimming pool is relocated out of the front yard; 6. That a predominantly one-story solution is found and that any/all two-story portions are stepped back from a main one-story element; 6.;- 111 NE 6`D Street,COA 2006-156 HPB Meeting March 15,2006 7. That the overall height, scale, and mass are reduced; 8. That the front entry door is revised to a more appropriate style; 9. That the aluminum porch rail is revised to wood; 10.That the shutters specified as wood, and; 11. That a design, which meets "strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area", is submitted. Report Prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: Proposed Elevations, Site Plan, Survey, & Floor Plan fJf LOT 1 Architecture by . LOT 2 HDA �v 31'-10"TWO STORY SET BACK f et 8T ir Hunter Deslgn Associates,Inc. ._-0----------------- •---------------------- 3801NDbdeMny SuRe 11 LOT 4 Baca Raton,Florida 33432 a - YARD j LOT 3 Telephorre��07394-8745 4 10.00'SET BACK j E-mad:hunldesabeilsouth.net I p I In Association with j ! AIC EQUIP. I COPE -- I SITE COVERAGE : Cope Architects,Inc. - COMP.01 i ! I i:lii a -- I Delray Beach,Florida 33483 LOT SIZE 120.05'x 81.8T:9828.50 SQ.F. 80 N.E.4th Avenue Telephone 58 RC EQUIP. ! 1o'.m ep ( 1)274-6706 BUILGING AREA COVERAGE:3318.8 SQ.F. COMP.#2 ! I DRIVE AND WALK AREAS:179e.1 SQ.F. Fax(581)274-8707 I 1 ® ' POOL AREA 417.9 SQ.F. METER I _ Q a I POOL DECK AREA 788.4 SC).F. i 2 Y I i'l• ` PROPOSED g I i 1 - TWO STORY N SQUARE FOOTAGE: !I I RESIDENCE D o j 1ST.FLOOR A/C:2305 SQ.F. I 2 ND.FLOOR NC:18372 SQ.F. 0 I 1 EVE CROWN( TOTAL A/C:42422 SQ.F. I I' 1Z I MOTOR ROAD I 1ST FLOOR PORCHES:IES:298.9 SQ.F. I r COURT -1 POOL EQUIP. 1ST.FLOOR PORTICO:51.3 SQ.F. i' I I 2ND.FLOOR BALCONY:296.9 SQ.F. CONSTRUCTION TYPE AS PER CH.601 F.B.C.2005 EDT. I I I OCCUPANCY:SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE GROUP R • N !j e T FENCE _I o Constructed by • o L LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Spengler ' IIo o i NORTH DEL-IDAESTATES Construction jI' I I ( I BEING A REPEAT OF LOTS 11 THROUGH 18,INCLUSIVE, I I r I LI - ! . BLOCK 2,DEL-IDA PARK(PLAT BOOK 9,PAGE 52, Inc. I' I I I I \ PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY.FLORIDA), i I 1 " ; POOL 1 BEING IN SECTION 9,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 43 982 N.E.3rd Ave. ' 1 1 j I i 1 a D ,i DECK I 7 EAST,CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,PALM BEACH COUNTY, Beach,FL FLORIDA. 33444 IiI II II II II II I is !' I iII i II II " POOL W 1 SITE LOCATION : !jI I II V. II II IiI b.:i Y II L___-t_ 1 -__-__-__-__ -_____= I E ed,STREET i 30.00'SETBACK I01 /// Project . WATER ! _. _ —_—_—_—.—_J 1 N LOTS j�/ - UNDERGROUND iI Jerk Lot 4 POWER 1 North Del-Ida Estates GATE COURTYARD i O •< II r ---------------- --- o LOT2 LOT Delray Beach,Fl. ,� 7th STREET . II I 1 o� I l BRICK DRIVE YARD - a Q I' w iI Z i LL I . !I I T I II I FENCE SIDE WALK 81.87* I - Date Revision/Issue / . ___, --------------------------_______-------•-6-- Designed S.L RC. - NE 6TH STREET Drawn S.L.A.S. Checked S.L.R.C. LOT4 Approved /� Project No. SITEPLAN Scale1/81-1'-0 _ W Date 8-11-05 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-O" Drawing A-1 Architecture by HDA Hunter Design Associates.Inc. • ey WINDOW SCHEDULE FIRST FLOOR U U U U 10 11 - u if 1 1 I I 1� ` 3801 N Di de Hwy I Raton,Boca Florida WINDOW FRAME - - Telephone(561)394-6745 A nI/I O� y DA_o o __ Fax(561)750-4074 - NO. LOC. SIZE NOTES EwH 0 r � E-mail: hunldesabegsouth.net . • TYPE MAT). MAT'L EiPlxr = W H D w oLSP . _U A PERIMETER ' n EN nLUMra lLLUMN P.G.T. 104 — — E In Association with • PERIMETER 32' 72' EH ALUMN. ALUMN P.G.T. a D - COP E C PERIMETER 30' s0• SH ALUMH ALUMN. P.G.T. LAUNDRY cows o PERIMETER 30' u^ SH ALUMN. ALUMN P.G.T. TOP Cope Architects,Inc n n FAMILY 80 N.E.4th Avenue E PERIMETER 30' 72' OH AWMIt AWMrL P.G.T. SINK ROOM Delray Beach.Florida 33483 GARAGEej KITCHEN Telephone(561)274-6706 � Fax(561)274-6707 r F=-rl AIC EQUIP. I4�o, _ I r � �- = w COMP./I ` -4 -. E II U I{ `< J 11 D / II — ey DOOR SCHEDULE FIRST FLOOR ''� r /.0 EQUIP. 1 REi COMP./2 /, OVEH ---___. DOOR FRAME `E PANTRY (1 ...... NO. LOC. SIZE HSET LABEL N.) NOTES POWD. — W MATt MATT TYPE DETAIL METER �(��)) r W Hi LE 11 I I \�61J AJ DINING 100 PORCH (2)3'Q' @1r ALUMN ALUMN. FRENCH PGT WITH SIDELIGHT - A ROOM 'II' 101 PORCH 3-O' 1T-0" ALUMN. ALUMN. FRENCH POT D f 102 PORTICO 3A' IT-CA WD NA S.C. CUSTOM WITH SIDE LIGHT 1 O3 1 A . 103 GARAGE ta0' ��.v e'a MIL MIL FLUSH INSULATED Li Constructed by 104 _ SIDE GARAGE 3 MTI- MIL -OAISEPNL INSULATED 11 Spengler 105 FAMLY ROOM (2)3 O' e-0• ALUM. ALUMNI FRENCH PGT WITH SIDE UGHT _ W Ia nI Construction STUDY STAIR Inc. ACw)- WELL = 382 N.E.3rd Ave. A Delray Beach.FL— 33444 = POOL EQUIP. 0 GREAT O ROOM �I Y E = UP = PORTICO FOYER _U Project —10 °�— Lot 4 u---- a--ll 11---w --+I North Del Ida Estates w w .4{ D w w Delray Beach, FI. b = UU ,00 OD/ • 0 . . ' PORCH f 1 1ri 1 I I W = II D U TUB SINK VEST. I 1 101 II _ BATH r•- I. ' I ' it III I I> _-.-. _J . l/wvJ I v Date Revision/Issue UE 1�l) GUEST CABANNA Designed S.L. R.C. WI = POOL Drawn S.L. AS. UChecked S.L. RC. Approved Project No. � IF II II 'I Scale 1/4'=1'-0' P Dale A A FIRST FLOOR PLAN w Drawing 1-23-06 cr•Ai m• 1IA.'—11_III A-2 Architecture by HDA Hunter Design Associates,Inc. W W W W W 3801 N Dbde Hwy . Ce WINDOW SCHEDULE SECOND FLOOR () U () Boca Raton.Boca Raton,Florida 33432 • WINDOW FRAME Il=11 —- 1 _ 1}=11 ) I Telephone(561)394-8745 L TUB I Fax(581)750 4074 NO. LOG. SIZE NOTES W E-mail: huntdesabeUsouth.net TYPE MAIL MATI. (r) W H �"J -��v�� A PERIMETER 3' Tr sir ALUMNI. AUJMN. P.G.T. — - CL J'� BATH BEDROOM In Association with • BEDROOM SUITE 2 COPE a PERu1ETER 72 SH AWMN. ALUMM P.G.T. SUITE 1 { • C PERIMETER 6P SM ALUM. ALUMN. P.G.T. 1 s"I` • Cope Architects,Inc. G PERIMETER 49' sH ALUM. ALUMN. P.G.T. IlI 80 N.E.4th Avenue E PERIMETER ae' 60' aN ALUM. ALUM. P.G.T. I Delray ne 27a87063 Telephone(561)Florida ____.) BATH Fax(561)274-6707 TUB 1 S A --- ; �, ram, 4 II U . . D = is's 01111:MY ey DOOR SCHEDULE SECOND FLOOR ROOF BELOW W VEST. e' CUT IL - WC\J DOOR FRAME _ /W\— S 1 K. I III v jr NO. Loc• SIZE HSET (MIN) NOTES v = DOWN MATL MATL TYPE DETAILIti v W ____ \ 100 BALCONY (2)3'F' e'-0' ALUMN. ALUMNI FRENCH PGT ''��rT'' r-�----- LL \ WEN ABUR CLOSET l - MASTER eax a Constructed by BATHROOM • = - Spengler !W = STAIR ` Construction `A WE1 1011)'' s..c I W = WINTER Inc. CLOSET 382 N.E.3rd Ave. 1 A 1 I 1 - Delray Beach,FL �/ = VEST. II 33444 El I I err! u MASTER _ ILJI SUITE5 =-_-_-_—L sulk I- — Project : III Lot 4 H North Del-Ida Estates 1 1 A 1 -1 DelrayBeach,Fl MASTER SITTING -- - BALCONY • U (rU U ° II - II °. Date RevisionAssue ROOF BELOW Designed S.L. R.C. Drawn SI.AS. Checked S.L. R.C. Approved Project No. Scale 1/4'=1.-0' Date 1-23.08 � SECOND FLOOR PLAN—, / Drawing Rt.Ai F• 1/4"=1'-()" A-3 Architecture by • HDA Hunter Design Associates.Inc. 3601 N Dade Hey Suite 11 Boca Raton.Florida 33432 Telephone(581)394-8745 Fax(561)750-4074 E-mail:huntdes©bellsouth.net 30 0'ROOF PEAK . - 12 In Association with "` COPE :::: ROOFSTANG SEAMYTL ROOF MILL FNISH - Fax(561)274-8707 WOOD OUTRIGGER AND FASCIA \II II II II II II II 11 II II II II II Ft II II CI I i) - l L ( J l �� 200 WINDOW HT. ROUND GUTTER CONT. - _ _ - _ 1S--ru UT — — J rd t~C J Id [yIL , (tl d z STANDING SEAM MTL ROOF MILL FINISH 72-0'SECOND FLOOR AWNING� ,a o ERG.Hr. I II II II II II II II II _ 1) trit n ,p, r J r , - e-v /+ ,�/�, y�}y _ _ _ WOOD OUTRIGGER AND FABC Constructed by . SCONCE Qt fIJ yb•� SMOOTH STUCCO Spengler t - - Construction SMOOTH STUCCO - ~ 5 rd Ct t 04 FIN-FlR.REF.ONLY Inc. 382 N.E.3rd Ave. Delray Beach.FL SHUTTER AND 33444 SHUTTER DOGS LOT 4 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 30 0*ROOF PEAK Project 12 - \ Lot 4 North Del-Ida Estates Delray Beach,Fl. STANDING SEAM MIL ROOF MILL FINISH / _ - \��\ - WOOD OUTRIGGER AND FASCIA NI I I I I] II II 11 11 II II II II II II II II II 11 II II 11 II 11 II II II 11/11 — i-- 'd 20-0'WINDOW HT. l ) i I I J_ _ "LLEI LI t n �_` Date Revisb,Nssue J Ctl t : d ty C b d STANDING SEAM MTL ROOF utll FINISH ,2-0'SECOND FLOOR 4p / J ,0_0'BRG. \„II II II II II II II II II II II f s=i (y{y�}y III II II 11 II II 11 II II II II SCONCE \_ I I I 4 _ - _( J• = _� J- -NNri B'-0' ,,Ip}y} _ - _ - WOOD OUTRIGGER AND FASCIA _ - SMOOTH STUCCO J G __ _ = Designed S.L R C. SMOOTH STUCCO _ �� ,I i'c Drawn S.L AS. X d t t7 Li — Checked S.L R.C. 0-0'FIN.FIR.-REF.ONLY -� Approved Project No. SHUTTER AND CAST STONE COL / Scale 1/4'=1�(Y LOT 4 SHUTTER fxr_a Date 1-23-06 EAST ELEVATION Drawing A-5 SCALE: 1/4"=1.-0" • • • • • . 1Y1•YI11ION11 MY • . 10.13.05 sightMrlgle•Spk Plan• . - • • 1220.0SRvd86,s Plan '- - e7.nr - 1.31.00 Med Bidg.Site Dan. MATERIAL SCHEDULE • . - -�--------"------------ S DATA, RESIDENTIAL (tat 4) (l Dt 4) • • • 4 " ' • Qty. Key Botanical/Common Name Size b - • AWandw i Taal6.1,p.Ll,yraaal••..a� sAa7 WI. 1 GTtldWa••••R••l0'd.� ..ii7 aclL g Op C1Yyldod.rarpdm LlteaoendAnee peke 1za.o/.,mla • 1 10.OD'8ET HACK • - � • I .aAIYdYMaDs0a/l.md�+.raedraNEa) au saFL • . 3 Sn .Sbaarsa nIco WAla bled w pandl.e - 6•ga.da-fntLL,hvF. • I L j 3 Rapt• RaY.mnaa eWal FL royal Paan,Iaiocalad 2S30R0ry.Wd. . "1 A,P ��// eruwdYrL+ny+a�?�•!Lv�•le Oro saFL 4 let- Ilan csaWlt7 Dalmra bogy tree • 12a50. • _ I ! i . .- .F.NeMwW+daancr...:m ff.D320) • 177 60FL 160 Nona NLP1dalWb W.Saud Ilan 121g.®tba - •1 • a • I O.9.7(89«eaaslY•FIIONCED aeo+GEL . . _ I I • ILTadr vL•.a.d.maur a cwwrr.a+lpw 6it • LTddrmbrdREOUi1ED W. 1 Twos 160 tb• FIa»llan)arNnaI FI8 elartwWa 3038'3G.Qtabd. • A/C C••.. - ''t�•71rii I - 6'a' '� 18• M• I10Xa1Drllaorria Ldldled9$IYoupoat 153g.@1B•oa - Sad • 17dd oumcrdsw PROVIDED to p•aLleae l.bal.d w.d.rj • • • 60 Mg bd01a caPD9aid Mu*grass 1'+'3RO1aC• • I m - - — ® I •y.Hol..q Wela.W • 27CP Ctr kaml Coraplum 9. • - • ., •. 2 IL 1 1 tTTw�ioum«aorwl.a xnvnr� rn..•ayrr • - Bkwleadaolt 203g.®2'Oc. 0'-0' AS Pc Ptrmabago®Parekl r-'---_--;r � p•� " plaNap LogY..oa cpeca a debat/ • 1 I L!1 I I _ I I • • . • _ Mulch,ace ape s.a deGga _ IF �� `\\ • I • 1 • Sod,acid Amid m (coda Irrigation®ROW area) - •• 1 '-C {i n Y • • 1 . IC {{ I� p �s Dr native Lana 1..aladdL,Par I 9 Q NOTE'-Demtaa Ng*drought Waring. SFNR•1D ©� I . .� A 1h.{t ID I - • V �p� )(ulrape NanuN'. ; _ _U • h spP ( OUT.M • • • • " • LANDSCAFEI.OTES •. • :":k -- "1 ' 1 'I.A110.• rWsgal rIL0Lrb•r.rpe•WWk•dilOJe nark.&A.-V•I•.- • l‘k•O' • I MOTOR I' D] y.Yru...s W,drr.F•..T-W...ar P•!R+•••r Llr.iad•rV•A•d,wn • • - • _} LA.rawwwaWdar w was.Agas ups FL Okada a L«Y.4 PWRaak.kk.Ll.bra . 1r ,'. � 1 COURT EQUIP. _ • . • LQ••e1S is,sondir drone r YOI.•1►YW WrrW tlJ4 Use(Jr - ' h'd ■� Zi.•r:L+rrura..rr.ode««.rd.r.rs•Y•n.L rsr.e.ard.�.+r4w • I • — - . Q. I Q Q.r•Iu.mad.Parka airs•«ha•rW.ash.aarrrr.pYi•alr hasp _ - Y 1 Ihfrafbfloa r•.Wm•Wbw•mJWYwi•rm wYr•alwOapAe1414.1• •w • - - ill1141,1) • �� •i it • �� • - • m 1„ W W..L.Oi4" ., gall bO.ayYnd..omia.dw Al W a ward••kr weak - • ` 1 • t • aeon raw r.L:,a •mdW.leak La <\. • Q Q sNww• rurw..w.mL»ear!rasu®:.a3mcawasYxw•r.a - Ip i -- -- � W U Tads rarv.aadw•aaWood aka•"e a bamd.mra.awa Osaka rrd co.* G • - , `� N �-• .wrrc.Yd„Ye•ad•o..d••o.ma 1••m dam lea 4ad earls aka to WWI.m• LUI�• Ce •W.1odrdYwt:a•.Y.ww waa.yL•ds.Wady«wa•rlpr.ad n..9...d.m.a DOG.a NEW PLANT MATERIALS.LOCATED WITHIN THE • Ift- o I __ �, I • Q� . r la•tld.iWsaks salI angasiaW _ r� #91 a.a..ro.».y.a..Yrr wlr•Na.ararr•k•a r.-._•_.—•.o•.rrc..r SIGHT TRIANGLE,ARE TO BELUJNTAINFD®38'OVERALL t1ElOHT `� ' 1' .- 1 u ii I. • /_ ` {•1 `*► , (, Q Z Z•Asscase•srPus..•rwrD.wn glws»r«•ua»aOs.I P4Wr•ar.... __.. - �I n rVil 1117.AYedaapr r.ur.sdrw.daak.e..arakc r.W�..ya`,urkalylr.r.Y.k. rm_. raY..sore., ��` I r {. _ _ _ � o c� 5��rw,•r rw.d rw..waw.a•.Pkdmd , WiAl''_, ,�.. __,_• , �I . • .Y...0 CYPRESS.xanr WASS aL Inll=OIIITE I N.= ' _ T:� —!-r •{— LAIIrW. .YrY!.•.dusa,4wL.hiA.rYwP•.r�•b'Vwa9iW WryrwrrNm.d •. • �� 1 --_--_ll__-_--=----_-1_ �!.. Z • " Ta aor.r•nadlr worn•.-.:ab rd•a.Pr.d«ardrpwtlrpwd»rm» i - I 1 • ,A��1 �`-- %w.•.W.wIP•r r.r..a•akra. _ /J►1 - Od ' I �, • 1 1..�711 Ord.. PM .. �� 1 II II 1 I ■t•'1 rry.gl.aedYaarlradl.YWk.•.•yWda•w....,t.aComm d.uaa.w• - rr .11% ma 1 /1[ POOL • 7 -l'•� • {rasa qN. i1a_rw.., r.•.4rV9'•LIsI•MWrrk•.au*Y•u.kk.ral*• . . .. +` y DECK t:�., t • ...ss.:.,«._t .,s u..arrwrd•gowns.s.aL�.L�rprr.d... ,t 1� I Ira 17Y/ • - +µ..dr.6—.roc v.rrr.m...•a.dh..dawk.dtaw ay.uwela.ar '�� 2% ,ii7 • ,..glr.aktrw Mawr.r.kaywW.aw.rwnr.L.r•+•awi=arw.,wr.. - _ • s • cwW.W.anYWrsp•NbW4d.vLWd.wk•dc•p•ammda wrrY.rp•.a1. - ? t@L rn.. 11.AaWawr'idw••a.«ka We•1rVaLd led•Yaa rda.a.P»4••Y+».1.W.»d • ,�� I �� © II ',.��I • • . dr.i...W.ma... r.•�A vyY.•cas rul>.6•Il rwwk/r•w•dha.P•l•a,1.yLir • .- • i`�• .L•i �y% 1. k�rgr..dr• •l•.d:•.Irarlm.W.ImDkabwrrrrdraglyWad.ari. ' •_ • 1 • ��' ©. POOL 11 - IiwY••a'µwaPp.darr..lWrPrWd bapri.adtllayyWapr•a..tr•p.b1 w dr/r.a•w______•..Waylra li.rl.awa.yai•pUoplrmrrrW.Wy . Y.O•••rWPY...o.WYlaaba••Iadp.».r La Waar•sams •Pr•wraa • 4)- Z a.Y••wydw..aa.Te.raea«•R»..mw1IsuRa doo..rm.l.:ar.oak*•mos.. . - �� xI - /r��/�a�//��= � OS CrLl.mayam dryWh.p.W»dYrdodr•q.R.r dw rkdaak.WaTrr.aala • • . 1 d , - - O..kaaaa,e.ow«..«>.radwsiwd..wWaLmwarnwadlww.. /\yy/7��/ dr.!� - - - —.__ _.... rr�'..6 1 !L 1111.•a d'tw sod a b m.s.i rw.W.ap,m.aa ZJ L_rr --- -.--- / O• . 0.AYr•ssmrr.au•rda.`a.dw•.Y.aarwk. • aep....ar.a••i.L••� 0• . � I'" 1 - Il J • 90.00'SET BACK ' 6 • • . . .. . _. . . . .. . i 'I. • . . • . - • COURTYARD_ J.J. f . . • •• . .TIS Li• c •i ,._. . • E• r'.rr Z amourL. s. rr.;.rw • r• �• . . t�..y. • ram/ T • .r.l10 �„3L Y r..w M.I.6 w• H]k♦ I �7a• �L ! ' -• (-1111c/. .,4_ ,,... 1,. I�J� r • • 03 1 •'' ]fin �" • j1--r rrw w �;; j- . ' TP shrubs / I �;' /5�=� r /�;' /`)� o A/ "Groundravere - ' o+i �••�.+. d fE.,, �_ .N ei.• / •1�uii f►' I, iiiiiiiin I �S �� ai� .t��:fir al 1p shwa"w•r«r onus. w.www....•.••. _ -----_... _ �.. ..-.. • D� W • wow.« `\ ,uwr.w.aka-.wu•.I" ru..Y.. . • ``'' . .••.oleo err«,.•w r r+r in meal•......1 r- ark««wan • sans PT1.w• +.1/`� w WAY*w Rt..,r« Nadel••.+7.J lW d.••1 so..••r rry rlwY rgl• •wVy WO - fN • N.I.w•r ra••r YI'Y _• - • 8 sa.......r•n I�1„a •Tr ra..�sore.r..a .soaks. r w..«»« w 1. Tar -.--E�}— • - y E. wow. + Wm. wsa..w row rwo �+.�d KLf�L+� a ••• al7 I,V• 7 r. .:.r.a.•a•a.•.�1. oaks..L»•• ."..•r=» ••• ��. _ C (�. • • IY;(P+'.}: ..fl. !ir•••.•lea•• .,la _ • • r a.rows rrar ' • •.a • ...al glass w.1 Y.P.R...rw r rw . - - ..a-..L S. war w..•w Straight'hunk Palms • - - - • • a ewwwN W u • W0.r•rife.woo.aa....«.a • pw.•.«w•W«Va.•.W wWW • �- ____---.�--_• ----�---------•�----_—_----_� - _r —r�-� • NE 6TH STREET • • �'v' • LOT 4talia NO. • u6 a,•D- . 1 • I 06A.15 •• SITE PLAN �•' • W G : SCALE1/8"=1'-0" • • . . i•I I ..- _ . - . . 10.1 SIphtMly Oil.SP�I PMiI • IRRIGATION LEGEND . . " • /• '' . • eu ,220.Ab Rw48di Plan .. • .••.•.•" . . . . • . • • ... .• . •• •. . • • •. . .. 7aotaaeP•P•wp.hi.wrpm,prrmwrw.. . Tw712 Rrtp 8Yd8Wrp.G,pstlrwMpr � . . - Q OkLasb UO.sY tw.,r M•r.rrsN - - r - yw�Ii'{%"i.�-- _. _ _.._ . ' YARD e.bmacroslr•x.rw I - - IIWdJtMa•.s•m - • r OC'SET= ' w7Eacou"teuypwYcr.rwJltbolmim - _ , SL z.- .-- -+� • MOLE MYabs itNnboiwssm shawl bimpic cl•misoap. - - ......• I . AN malt low ivabwsnlo b 1ptaYit WeWaistg.•m*crai. . ` - - • C061PA� . _ . ' - t Ca • . • COMP.••• • • • ' •. „ • ict 4. . • II i a , - • . • . .. rol . . . • • . fI71 0Z MI IRRIGATION AOTEB: •:I I .� L? �__—__�C o ran t�LJ 1 (I�_, C� INsc ' ti A.amwcbdprlei iY+Yii - , , I • '= �' '' V wrraa.earmr • MOTOR ; - . w m Rums* lmW le • ' 1 a• • I COURT �Ld'�==4��is,�,u°z� a •' • y.Yatwill.w.ircNwr.r•a..trwm,mertiwsnrwv • 0 '� wacm/.mipaimla. I • V 1 .; II 1 . _ . V � , • ( - � � rweaywrr.wm•ww,l para.aa udltillill - I' . 7" O yW diem btiwi0iWf7.,N%•Wt.laiaTliEAE61NLL0E1pfPoP1Y1iFAG{ • , t , I - WW rwrarurwbbN.pwbmmmtbwsr++rmw.wayp.wbp.mgalvq. UR�➢FOR MEPA0.10i. ' ' N a I� ' • ,e `�,FEE -•I ��LI r • Q. . Tb..•rmbs...•lammbW.irYa.Carw.WrMl6wTlbsls lm ter 1s.0.WYr WsoYr.,eb Wrerr awbf+mrV.dabbbub0.�lo I � ' - - • . .Z re Cal Z i•br.rr.b..rbtis.rr..a..i Pe.l1..C•ioWwYrwrob Pala a..wwYYa abmaale.W. 71-7 � ! Il , , Q -1 • 16bKb.wmb.m.4blapm.••..dabbbl•a.am%•iplpD.tlCar I. - - w a z(plb•Yr.rW..iaN•JrYba•.tNWb.•mrcm.Y.b,dWYbW.aba.prad++ I iI 0 IU n N• bawf..Wobµr.mYdmr•paal Y�[tbwbbbtlr.im8tl1.DPVC-0wtlbY•sdb.WNSWW.trb.YN • • 1. 1 -_ tyy- y�q �___._.... • C.rmYialpal eaW1mm..iwtpWC m b Pw b•9r Y0 mrW.►warWb.W bgrma.ma.....i,p..r Fbd"Ylw.r.i.dgiYtLi ma apaJ�a' . NpC1.0 RCa.oab b gal•FwrP.sr.sr loam bag am mmpuiaa I • . a .1 I POOL I • • go YmmPi.rrMb.•fbyWseW./•W p.a••.awiPpd•is•ba•pbJr 7a.1TRDWW�r.Wr la balsa.r pp.Wmw•awrYp.rHpaWW.gad al DECK t ``• • - .p.rbibr.pwar.a,wa y.JbYes•IWbbb•r m WanmbiYiN wail be abrai:Ib. +L.+•ari.rWb to kW h bl...... • IMf..l. I .. - • .- J.poWr.b.I.Osa.mrbp..mrgrG.mb.O.rH.mCe..6Spx.t Wlbb"•wI a • i byrm•pYr DSO P.rbtOGYamw..vm.lpYmabi.•IimRtYma•Wbi/' ewa6s Wpa WY•wm*I.sm.mbPr•.Pr•Pmbi.atl"bb4lweim • 1 I - • weir•ama•awp.ryW► •J / s/ la M go tabNa..•pmal..taw.Yr• waeP p.rPa. Iv .J bbss sWa m.a Ir O.mb sagaat . tbb S4 • • -yaa.•bb•pYwsUbasawau¢r(wamvlmwprm•uwmr...gtom .,•as.v a.m.,m.ameiar 1lp iforeWe ma wag I i .� - POOL- ' bwwW 1 . . pyabr.•sm•sdmaJWsm.d.ar+Ib WStl Ybs.mpryrawslaasYAraa.I a - /. a .• Z p0 - t.. ppweia•w•.mmpbdJW ba•r iawbrm.r mmia. Cmsmrapwwcaia.r,a.pnwaaWdm�aOrsrW�►.,prw ala+rb ( L��- ..-..{_— --�.--��—�—�..�.�..—w-...w.-..a.�•.—.+......, - - 1�C P.aty wsbrro-.ai.wmbstbrasWw•matyvmww•. 1 4. - O `L • wpp.wb barerwP.a..e..mmtma.adpam.ru.a.avmr.... I• .10.00'SET BACK amW lrW..a.•br.rOesd.sW bl.rM•.il mmmrW Wail,bbl.sl i • ... I _ �> in , 4 Poem.I.*pa..W.awaa.o..a Par•al.IAA bWaabp0l•p PVC.11mw waGty CeebmrW.pa•paWm repa.w bai.r.bb mr•.•e.a.m.. . Wb.••••Pals Ymi..w ill¢gammas bppi W.Ca6saa.eW.Wbbm(ai I tt I I r+ • a.pl.i r.rm•Jrrp Wass.••.+ COMiA0LiY8TEL' I • v . ii.a14m4d•,.a.W.bb•144Na.tKa••s NmmmWm..b.dorb4. _ • i� - OTM�• iWbWi...ma•.b bbimw a..rbtW biGN O.b.tra glp.NebrpliF ..•..w•b.sJa.t•adt.•. I - ,s • N WIbPC.ItembbW.l b 8010114 Simi JAW b.TY r.tu b cos m • - I •�' •• .• • • . - .ii..l Pd a•.tywb.a.babm YYWe.abd[11111,c>,••avPYCpp P.m.rma.Otysapw.•Irbbmb4•Ybaadr. Ip. • I ? - • .. li a - I . - • • Pp•WbbwMwb ismfapla a mbtai•I1P•,bnab M waJ►m.i Ion Cam.br bmaaWWbgpaol b b lwavp/A.i•r•dasi.aipri•ea •. - .m•abw/.pswiwriwr•rb.IwrY.lbap.abWmpn•tl.br Pa. '• ; / m bp/,amibnaser a(p�wm f.c w..wbpe+'ibWmmr.aCwY - 1 ;�• 11 �� '', • C z • Baif.l.Wr Wr b arbaYari•bsrba.mm rtbC•ti N mra amps" •sbtbanMy alas b q maa • - O • mmprwrb YbWm Mr. VALVES i • � Arnim�. �v � I. Cl.• BPWiM14EAi Wad.rmpb.a•ist WmY.a•/r.a.Ibb.rl•aprmhgmmma.w4amaw•. _ '' .— - - v _• 6pN1rbu0ema.tMwpcml4d Ww..Imldb W,C Wdnp.mYhb.Wdaap wpraWpaNm•.sa6blWWtlbs W.vWaptwbai wa•tWs. all .I� •„ ow - • JowY.aLbpwia.lmamwap..r.wa.mrmbpr+a•Wm.ar6Jmwbm. • I F' I t1N aG.w. _... • 0 re RASISE • • Waage SOi ---._----c 1 ^_.�, SIDEWALK • - N -, 1'I.�,�. re prop.p•pgbrY WlbTasrb e,walrbp.Waabbbalwm/atl.P•N Itltfd'blesrw;bpY.bW.4Wbwt.mmo�mY�bbsrw bm4 fEIKW. -yp...�1�F� •!j.(M� • • Cui ••s.bipom.gr.Iwa.mmMe•.i '•--•-j1.... a ..... e _ • J • o___moo. • li o �.. - _ m c • o Z v • .• Vhw(�O(IIi, . Cn .Z'. NE 6TH STREET o;T: .• . • . . • • z. LQT.4 • _ • • . .Oils ......N JW NO. . . ' - ("---- ------- -7--=----- . . SITE PLAN QSHUT 5.A,6 • • • W SCALE:1I8"=11-0" • 2 . ;. . MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: March 15, 2006 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Randee Schatz, Maura Dersh, Michelle Reich, Joanne Peart MEMBERS ABSENT: Linda Lake, John Miller, Jr. STAFF PRESENT: Amy Alvarez, Brian Shutt, Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:07. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Reich and approved 5 to 0 (Ms. Lake and Mr. Miller absent) to approve the Minutes of February 15, 2006 as written. III. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS A. LDR Initiated Text Amendment to Sections 2.4.6(E) and 4.6.19, and the definition section as it relates to protection of"Historic Trees". Item Before the Board: Recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board Ms. Alvarez outlined the Staff Report regarding this item and stated that staff recommended the Board recommend approval to the Planning &Zoning Board. At this point on the Agenda, Ms. Valek swore in all individuals for testimony. Public Comments Ms. Annette Annechild and Ms. Kathy Degroot spoke and expressed their concern with the seemingly increasing removal of trees within the City and both stated they were in favor of this Amendment. Chairman Perez asked if there were any others who wished to comment. There were none and he closed the Public Comments. There was no discussion by the Board members. It was moved by Ms. Reich, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and approved by a 5 to 0 vote (Ms. Lake and Mr. Miller absent) to recommend approval to the Planning &Zoning Board. Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 B. 6-Month Moratorium of Demolitions, Additions, and New Construction in the City's Five Historic Districts. Item Before the Board: Recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board Ms. Alvarez advised that the Ordinance had been revised and passed out the revised copy to the Board members and advised the public that they were available for them as well. Ms. Alvarez then outlined the Staff Report and explained the revisions to the Ordinance. She further stated that Staff recommendation to the Board is that they recommend approval of the Moratorium to the Planning and Zoning Board. Public Comments Mr. Jim Brady, an attorney practicing in Ft. Lauderdale addressed the Board. He stated he had been on the Historic Preservation Board in Ft. Lauderdale for ten years and understood the importance of the decisions to be made by this Board. He said he opposed this Moratorium Ordinance as it affects one of his clients. He said his client was present and will also be speaking. Mr. Brady further stated that at their December 2005 meeting the Board had approved a COA for the demolition of a structure on a lot that was purchased by his client in order to build his home on it. He said building plans had been drawn up but if this moratorium was approved, it would significantly affect his client. He further stated if the moratorium was approved he thought anyone who had been granted a COA by the Board in the past year should be exempted from this moratorium. Mr. Brady then said that in his thirty years as a City Attorney he did not recall any moratorium that had not been extended beyond the original time frame. Mr. Enrique Martinez Celaya, the purchaser of the aforementioned lot, addressed the Board and passed out a hand-out to the Board, the contents of which he then read to the audience. He said a moratorium in the City of Delray Beach is a bad idea for the following three reasons: 1) The City possesses the infrastructure to evaluate projects on a case-by-case basis; 2) The position of building restrictions does not prevent mansionization, as the City Manager says, but rather discourages and limits affordability as the paper enclosed in your package shows conclusively; and 3) It is too expensive, in Delray Beach, for any homeowner/investor who restores houses in poor condition. Mr. Celaya then made further comments on the above three points. Ms. Annette Annechild, 300 North Swinton Avenue, addressed the Board and said she appreciated the Board considering this item and thinks that it was a good idea to stop and look and think. She stated she definitely supported this proposal. Mr. Louie Gardella, 329 NE 7th Avenue, said he was in favor of the moratorium as he thought it would slow the mansionization, but that he had some questions about properties in the Historic Districts. Chairman Perez advised him he would have to wait until the end of the meeting when the Board could answer public comments. 2 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Mr. Pete Dwyer, 711 Seagate, stated he was a twenty-one (21) year resident of Delray Beach and that he was very familiar with the Historic Districts. He said he was vehemently opposed to the moratorium. He said the review process was already in place and this proposal would only raise prices for anyone buying property in Delray. He further stated he thought the energy of "Save Delray" was misguided. Mr. Dwyer said most residents are upset over the proliferation of townhomes and condos going up on every corner with higher densities than were allowed in the past. However, he stated the guidelines are already in place in the Historic Districts and the moratorium would only result in higher costs for everyone. Mrs. Shannon Dawson, 527 North Swinton Avenue, was next to address the Board. She stated that prior to purchasing the property, she and her husband had checked with the City and they were told that the property was non-contributing. Mrs. Dawson said she agreed with Mr. Dwyer that the review process for the Historic Districts was already in place because she and her husband had been going through a long process in trying to get everything approved so that they could begin building on their property. Now, if the moratorium is passed, they might be prohibited from doing so despite all their efforts to follow the guidelines that were in place. She further said she agreed with Commissioner Levinson's opinion that you don't need to have a moratorium in order to revise guidelines. Mr. Mike Simon, 314 N.W. 16th Street, stated he had been a resident of Delray for forty- one (41) years. He said he agreed with what the other residents had said and that the idea for a moratorium seems to be a clear reaction to the political environment. He further stated that, having been on the Historic Preservation Board, he agreed that the mechanisms are already in place. He said that people had begun processes under the guidelines of the LDRs and the direction of the Board. He agreed that a moratorium on demolitions in the Historic Districts was a good idea but stated it was not fair to penalize people who had already begun permitting processes under the guidelines in place at that time. He said the moratorium seemed to be a "knee-jerk reaction" and that it would significantly affect people's lives, their properties and their right to develop those properties under the guidelines that were in place when they purchased those properties. He said people had gone to the City to confirm what the process was in order to build in the Historic District and that to just stop them in the middle of this process was basically taking away their rights by them not being aware this moratorium was coming. Mr. Andy Spengler then addressed the Board and advised that he was to be one of the presenters at the meeting. He said that he was opposed to the moratorium and that, in response to what Mr. Simon had stated, if he had been in the market to purchase property in Delray Beach and knew that this moratorium was in the pipeline, he definitely would not have done so. Mr. Spengler said that he would be presenting a project for the third time at this meeting, one that had been processed using guidelines that had been in place for several years. He stated that they had previously obtained approval on his project for re-platting and for demolition and if this moratorium was approved he was sure it would last longer than six months. This would result in financial risks and losses and he did not know how he would handle them as a small builder. He said he is adamantly opposed to this. Mr. Hayden Burrus, 10 NE 6th Street, addressed the Board and said that it was critical that the Board implement the moratorium. He said that there had been a lot of discussion about the "cons" but the "pros" needed to be brought up also. He stated the idea had been brought up by the City Manager who was very well informed and had 3 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 been the City Manager for many years. He said it had been discussed and passed by the City Commission and that the Mayor had supported it, as well as the citizens of the Historic Districts and, according to the last elections, the citizens of Delray Beach support it. Mr. Burrus said that it was important that the Board support the citizens of the City, rather than the developers that build in the City. Ms. Claudia Willis, 160 Marine Way, stated she supported the moratorium and asked that the Board would also. She said there were obviously loopholes in the system as she had seen the Marina District disappear during the twenty plus years she had lived there. She said she hoped that the rules could be tightened during the six month time frame. Ms. Lois Brezinski, 110 NE 7th Street, advised she disagreed with what had been said earlier that people are not interested in approving small houses on small properties. She said her street has many small homes that have been restored and this is happening on many streets in the district. She pointed out that there was a lot on Swinton Avenue with a restored small historic home on either side on which it is being proposed to build a 4,500 square foot home which would tower above its surroundings and definitely not"fit" in this area. Ms. Brezinski said if the Board would approve such a structure, obviously the guidelines are not clear enough or are not being interpreted correctly. She said the residents in the Historic Districts are only asking for some breathing room for a short time so that the guidelines can be reviewed and are made clear enough so that the Board can easily interpret them so that the look and the rhythm of the area can be preserved. She further stated that this would not include a twenty thousand square foot project being approved to be built on the one-acre lot next to her. She said she therefore challenged anyone speaking at this meeting who said everything is in place to drive up and down the streets in the Del-Ida District and they will see otherwise. Ms. Livia Landry, 701 North Swinton Avenue, said she lives in a fifteen hundred square foot historic home with other similar homes in this are. She then advised the Board that at its last meeting they had approved a forty-two hundred seventy five square foot house to be built next to her. She said that this house will tower over the homes in the area, including hers. She said she has read the historic guidelines and the LDRs and believed these indicate that this project should have been denied. She said she is not usually an advocate of moratoriums but believes one is called for given the current situation in Delray Beach. She understood and hoped that the guidelines would not change, they will just be made more specific so they will be more easily interpreted. She said she thought the Board will then be able to make better recommendations and decisions. Ms. Landry stated she is in favor of the moratorium although she hoped there was some way those who were already in the process of beginning their project could be accommodated. She said she felt this was a good first step and she hoped the Board would vote in favor of it. Ms. Liz Bold, 1104 Nassau Street, addressed the Board and stated she was against the moratorium. She said she moved to Nassau Street approximately ten years ago and had been before the Historic Preservation Board several times. She said she felt the guidelines in place were quite specific regarding restorations or additions. She said she thought it was a scary idea that nothing could be done in the Historic District for a six month period. 4 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Ms. Aleida Riley, 65 Palm Square, in the Marina District said she is a long time resident of Delray and she thought the moratorium was the greatest thing that could have happened. There being no additional persons wishing to speak, Chairman Perez closed the Public Comments. Board Comments Ms. Maura Dersh asked if the moratorium affected all projects that are in process. Mr. Shutt, Assistant City Attorney, replied that any application that had been approved prior to March 6, 2006 will still continue on in the process but anything submitted after March 6th would be affected by the moratorium. Ms. Reich asked if changes would be made to the LDRs as a result of this moratorium. Chairman Perez discussed how the LDRs are constantly changed and pointed out that, contrary to what had been stated in this meeting, several changes had been made over the years, such as how there could no longer be three-story townhomes that were built "straight up". He said the LDRs now require that the third floor be recessed back and other restrictions on massing. There was further discussion about the retroactive date of the moratorium, March 6th and Chairman Perez stated he did not think it was fair, that there should have been possibly a thirty day notice of this action so applicants could finalize and submit plans in progress. He did point out that the moratorium excluded structures under two-thousand square feet and additions that were less than fifty per cent (50%) of the original structure. Ms. Dersh stated that she thought the moratorium was a good idea, that there was enough property in Delray Beach that if someone wanted to build a large home, it did not have to be built in the Historic District. (Applause). Ms. Dersh also questioned the March 6th date and asked Mr. Shutt to clarify again what the actual "start date" of the moratorium would be. He replied that if the Board did not agree with the retroactive date, they could recommend denial of the Ordinance to the Commission with the direction that the Board would have approved it if the date the moratorium was to begin had been changed to a future, rather than retroactive, date. Ms. Peart said she was opposed to changing the date as she thought the idea needed to be implemented as quickly as possible. (Applause). Ms. Schatz said she was in favor of the Ordinance because the Board had struggled in the past with trying to interpret the guidelines. She said she thought the biggest issue to be dealt with was the size of new houses. She further stated she really had a problem with the fact that the penalty for breaking the rules of the Ordinance could result in jail time and that, if instead, there was going to be a fine, it needed to be a significant fine, not just $500. She said she also was opposed to the retroactive date. She summarized by saying she thought the concept was very good but she had a problem with the way parts of the Ordinance were worded. After further discussion, Ms. Dersh said she thought they should take a vote. Mr. Shutt directed the Board as to how the motion should be made, with any direction they wanted to make to staff to be made after the vote. 5 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Motion/Findings: It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Peart and denied with a 4 to 1 vote (Ms. Peart, Ms Schatz, and Ms. Dersh dissenting, Ms. Lake and Mr. Miller absent) for approval of the moratorium ordinance to the Planning and Zoning Board establishing a six-month moratorium on any new development proposals included, but not limited to, demolitions, new constructions, and additions for all five (5) of the City's historic districts and recommended that the effective date of the moratorium coincide with second reading of the enacting ordinance (not March 6, 2006) and felt that the penalties contained in the ordinance were extreme. Direction to Staff Chairman Perez led the discussion by saying that he did not think the moratorium should be retroactive to March 6th; that he thought the citizens should be given more notice. Mr. Shutt asked if an effective date of April 18th, the date of the second reading before the Commission was agreeable or was the Board looking for an effective date further out. Ms. Peart again stated the thought the March 6th date should be left as is, but Mr. Perez, Ms. Dersh and Ms. Reich were in agreement that it should be made effective as of April 18th Mr. Shutt asked if the Board had any further direction to staff. Ms. Schatz again stated she thought the possible jail term penalty was too harsh and she thought instead there should be a meaningful fine. Mr. Shutt pointed out that jail time was the maximum penalty. Chairman Perez suggested that there be a clause that the moratorium could not be extended. Mr. Shutt replied that this could not be done as they could not bind a future Commission action. At 7:20 the Board took a short break and Ms. Schatz left the meeting. IV. Certificates of Appropriateness The meeting resumed at 7:26 and Chairman Perez read the Quasi-Judicial Rules. A. North Del Ida Estates Lot 2 — 116 NE 7th Street, (Formerly 106 NE 7th Street), Del-Ida Park Historic District, Andrew Spengler, Owner. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex parte communications regarding this item. He stated he had spoken with the applicant twice regarding procedural items. Ms. Alvarez then advised the Board that the applicant had requested that this item be tabled. It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Reich and approved 4 to 0 (Ms. Schatz, Ms. Lake and Mr. Miller absent) to table this item. B. North Del Ida Estates Lot 1 — 112 NE 7th Street (Formerly NE 7th Street), Del-Ida Park, Andrew Spengler, Owner. Chairman Perez asked if there was any ex parte communication on this item. He stated that he had spoken with the applicant on this item. 6 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Ms. Alvarez advised the Board that this item was for approval of a COA for the construction of a new single-family residence at the address shown above. She said the property previously contained a Contributing one-story, single-family dwelling and detached, single-car garage. During its meeting of August 3, 2005, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and recommended approval for the demolition of the existing structures based on the fact that they appeared to have very little architectural or historical merit. Ms. Alvarez stated this lot was previously a part of six (6) non-conforming lots which have since been reconfigured and replatted into four (4) conforming lots. She said, at the HPB meeting of June 15, 2005, it was stressed that the layout and design of the four (4) proposed single family homes `....will be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area.' Ms. Alvarez then detailed more of the staff report and said the applicant had now submitted revised plans and is now before the Board for the second time for the construction of a two-story, single family residence at 112 NE 7th Street. She described in detail the elevations and the measurements of the structures. Ms. Alvarez advised the Board that the plans submitted did not meet the LDRs or the Historic Preservation Guidelines or the requirements quoted above from the June 15, 2005 HPB meeting. She said that the applicant has submitted three proposals for review, none of which have met the aforementioned requirements. Ms. Alvarez said, based upon the analysis in the Staff Report, positive findings could not be made and staff recommends denial. Applicant's Presentation Mr. Andy Spengler, owner of the property, then addressed the Board. He said that when Ms. Alvarez was making her presentation, she kept referring to the streetscape and what was consistent with the neighborhood. He said that the Board's example of appropriate in-fill construction in Del-Ida was for a two-story structure. Mr. Spengler said that he had been working on this project for over a year and a half and that, during that time, he had dealt with three different historic planners. He said when he took the projects to the Board previously they had indicated that they would prefer that the proposed structures be consistent with the zoning district, not necessarily with what is in the historic district. He said he had met the setback requirements for this zoning district which was R-1-AA. Mr. Spengler said that if the restrictions on lot sizes had been changed to allow for larger lots, it would only follow that larger structures would be built on those lots. Mr. Spengler advised the Board that he had done a survey of the homes on NE 7th Street and that less than 50% would be considered historic in nature. He said he thought what he was proposing would add merit to the area and that fifty years from now, when people looked at the homes he hoped to build that they would think they wanted them to be preserved, based upon their architectural value. Ms. Spengler said that when he came before the Board in December 2005 they had indicated that they thought the plans he presented were very beautiful in architectural value. He said the buzzword at that time was that square footage was not an issue, however massing was a concern. At the suggestion of the Board, he said he had made changes to reduce the pitch of the roof, remove the dormer, make the first floor and second floor shutters consistent, added hardiplank to both the first and second floor and basically added a wrap-around porch to help break up the first and second floor dimensions. Mr. Spengler said that they had addressed all of the comments and that he thought they would go through an easy approval process at the January meeting. He 7 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 said that square footage had never been brought up, that massing on the second floor was the issue but that the project was still denied. Mr. Spengler then stated that the architectural style of project brought before the Board at this meeting had been changed as they were trying to address concerns that kept coming up. He said that the second floor area was now forty-foot wide, twenty foot narrower than previously submitted. He said the garage is set back twenty-seven feet from the front plane of the house, as requested by Ms. Alvarez. Mr. Spengler stated that the architectural style of the house was now "Mission" and that it should fit very well in the historic district. He said he thought it would be consistent with the Del-Ida area. He talked about two other homes in the area that had required Variances in order to be built and made comparisons between those two and his proposal and pointed out that they were not required to request a Variance for this house. Mr. Spengler said that he did not think this house could be called a "mansion", that it was up to the architect to minimize the look of the exterior while creating as much square footage under roof as possible. He then listed all of the items that had been of concern and said he felt all of them had been addressed. He said he was bringing this project in for the third time and believed it was sensitive to what the community and the Board wanted and hoped that it would be approved. Public Comments Mr. Rob Mannweiler, 109 NE 7th Street, addressed the Board and stated his concern over the size of the house Mr. Spengler had proposed. He said all four of the houses he was planning to build would be the largest in the neighborhood and he did not think they were consistent with the neighborhood. Mr. John Hackett, 10 NE 10th Street, said that Mr. Spengler had built a house that was close to his home and it was the nicest one in the area. He pointed out that the house presently before the Board would be built on a lot much larger than others in the adjacent area and, therefore, it seemed logical that the structure could be larger and still be consistent. He said he thought it was a great project and he supported it. Mr. Peter Dwyer, 711 Seagate Drive, stated he had known Mr. Spengler for a long time and thought he does a very good job in what he does. He said he thought Mr. Spengler had addressed all concerns and, although the house he planned to build was larger than those in the area, the lot was also much larger. . Mr. Dwyer said the house was good looking, it had some elements that went back to the 1920's, it has some architectural features that could be found in Banker's Row and it would look much nicer than a lot of structures within the historic district. He stated he strongly supported this project and wished that the City would get rid of a lot of the "junk" that is in the district. Ms. Livia Landry, 701 North Swinton Avenue, advised she disagreed with Mr. Spengler's belief that this is an in-fill house, as there had been a home on this lot. She said his proposal was for a beautiful home but the way it was presented, it looked like it was on a much larger lot. Ms. Landry stated Mr. Spengler builds beautiful homes but she did not believe this one was compatible in this district. She said because this would eventually be four very large houses on four adjacent lots, it would really be incompatible with the area. Ms. Janine Shuman, 116 NE 6th Street, stated she thought the house was absolutely stunning but pointed out again that it was usually a certain type of person that moved into the historic district. She said she and her husband had looked in the historic district because they liked the charm and the quaintness. She said although the house is beautiful she was concerned about the type of person who would purchase such a home and whether they would care about the community the way they did and whether the quaintness and charm would be gone. 8 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Mr. Scott Porten, 112 Basin Drive, said it should be remembered what was on the lots previously, that there were dilapidated houses which had been demolished. He said, regarding the previous person's comments, you could not get into the mind set of the person who would be purchasing the house. He said that Mr. Spengler had been through a lot in trying to meet the direction given by the Board and said he supported this project. Mr. Hayden Burrus, 10 NE 6th Street, then addressed the Board and stated there were numerous very large homes being proposed in the area, four of which are to be built by Mr. Spengler. He said the neighboring very small house on 6th Street was up for sale and it was his opinion that there would be one after another that would be put up for sale and that was not historic preservation, it was historic destruction. Mr. Burrus also said he did not agree that Mr. Spengler had tried to accommodate the wishes of the Board, that he had reduced the size of the homes by a very small margin. He said there were no homes on 6th Street that were two-story and none over twenty-five hundred (2,500) square feet and the house Mr. Spengler was proposing was totally out of scale with the immediate neighborhood. He said the Board was in place to support the residents, not the developers and the residents clearly did not want these houses built in their neighborhood. He hoped the Board would reject the entire project. Mr. Scott Richman, 802 North Swinton, said that he thought there was a lot of public out crying because of the number of massive townhouses being built. But he said that, in this case, Mr. Spengler had followed by the direction of the Board and he thought he had done a very good job. He said the former house that was there was blight and this would be a tremendous improvement. He stated change is inevitable and things cannot remain stagnant forever. Mr. Richman closed by saying he felt Mr. Spengler had followed the guidelines and that he supported this project and hoped the Board would approve it. Mr. Mike Simon, 314 NW 16th Street, addressed the Board and said that these three projects are outstanding in design and that the house being discussed was proportionate to the lot. He said, based upon the figures presented, there would still be approximately one-half of open space left on the lot after the house was built. He stated he was in total support of the projects. Ms. Claudia Willis, Marine Way, stated these definitely were fine homes but they could be built in other areas of the City. She said the historic districts were all about preservation and about historic homes in historic areas. She stated that (possibly a prior) Board had allowed large homes to be built on 7th Avenue and that if these houses were approved, it would be the start of many more large homes being built and it would be the beginning of the end of this historic district. (Applause) Ms. Patrice Fitzgerald, 1610 NW 2"d Avenue, stated that when Mr. Spengler got approval for his other two houses as historic homes but they were part of the Village of Delray. She said these showcase houses brought attention not only to the Del-Ida district, but to the Village of Delray. She said the scale of this house was fine and not everyone wanted to live in a twelve-hundred square foot house. She further stated that people have families and need larger houses and that this town was supposed to support families and community. Ms. Fitzgerald said she supports this project as she has seen the Del-Ida area progress in the last couple of years and she thinks it will be a very good addition to this area. (Applause). Ms. Toni DelFiandra, 14 Dixie Boulevard, addressed the Board and told them she liked the project that he put on Seacrest before. However, she was concerned with how the neighbors feel. The homeowners in that area purchased extra large lots in order to have space around their homes. 9 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Ms. Lois Brezinski, 110 NE 7th Street, stated the house Mr. Spengler proposed to build would be next door to her home. She said she liked the design and she thought they were finally seeing what had been envisioned for the historic area. She said she thought Mr. Spengler was now sensitive to the architecture and the antiquity of the area. Ms. Brezinski then stated that Mr. Spengler had not returned calls from her or from others interested in this project and that he had not cleaned up the lot or trimmed the hedges and you cannot walk on the sidewalk around it. She said he had not reached out to the community and if he had met with the neighbors, as another applicant had done, he would have generated a lot more good will. She stated she did not have a problem with having one of his houses on one of the lots but would not be happy with four houses of this size on four lots as it would destroy the feel and the look of the neighborhood. Ms. Shannon Dawson, 527 North Swinton, said that part of the beauty of Delray is the charm and the quaintness but, also, how eclectic it is. She said there are so many different architectural styles that contrast each other and so many different sized homes as well. She said she felt this beautiful two-story home would add to the area. She said Mr. Spengler had done a beautiful job on this house and had proven himself in the past in Delray and she felt the project should be given a chance. Ms. Valerie Brinks, 906 SW 27th Avenue in Boynton Beach, asked if she could address the Board, although she was not a citizen of Delray Beach. She was told she could and explained that she sold real estate in this area and that Del-Ida was a "hot" area to be in. She explained this was because people liked the small individual houses as they liked the character of the houses. She said she had people requesting terrazzo floors because they wanted the old Florida charm and they wanted yards with grass. She said if they wanted large homes like Mr. Spengler is proposing, they would go to Boca or Palm Beach Gardens or go out west. Ms. Brinks said when she first saw the houses being built by Mr. Spengler, she thought "oh no, here it comes" (that the McMansions were coming). She said she was afraid that these large houses would change the flavor of the neighborhood. As no one else wished to speak, Chairman Perez closed the Public Comments. Staff's Cross Examination Ms. Alvarez asked for clarification as to whether the proposal that was presented at this meeting was for lot number one or two. Applicant's Cross Examination Mr. Spengler discussed the issue of square footage, in response to one of the speaker's calculations. He also said that by going "vertical" and building a two-story house, he was leaving more open space and that that would be what would help minimize the overall look. He stated he also wanted to reiterate that on 7th Street, there are eleven (11) out of sixteen (16) lots that are fifty foot (50') wide and those homes are typically thirty-foot (30') wide. He said if he put a thirty-foot (30') wide house on his lots, one of which was eighty-two foot (82') and another that was ninety-five foot (95') wide, it would be totally out of balance. He also pointed out again that they had more than met the required setbacks and had not requested any Variances. He said he had tried to incorporate features such as those used by Mizner in the 1920's and had tried to keep the design in balance with other buildings in the area. He also said this type of house would probably be purchased by someone with a family who wants to live in Delray and in the historic district and that was who he was trying to market to. (Applause) 10 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Board Discussion Ms. Peart said that the reason they were asking for a moratorium was because they needed more specifics regarding square footage, but that there are rules currently in place that state that what is build in the historic district must be compatible in size, mass, scale, and height with what is already there, and also with the rhythm of what is already on the street. She said she hoped that Mr. Spengler would meet with the neighbors and try to come up with something more compatible and possibly consider a smaller two- story house with a one-story next to it so that it would "graduate" into the street. She said, as presented, she would have to vote for denial. Ms. Reich said Mr. Spengler had made a valid attempt and the design was beautiful, but that it still looked so large and it was not in proportion with the community. She stated we need to preserve this area and she would have to vote to deny this project. Ms. Dersh stated she thought that a larger home should be allowed to be built on this larger lot, but that she still had a problem with the massing of this house. She further stated she did not like the east elevation because it was a long, massive wall. She said she also had a problem with the roof, that a "Mission" style house did not have all of the barrel tile as was shown on the rendering. She said she wasn't sure how she would vote. Chairman Perez said he agreed with Ms. Willis regarding the Marina District in that it no longer appeared to be a historic district because house after house was built on the intra-coastal and Board after Board approved the new houses because the guidelines were not clear. He said that was the reason for the moratorium. He said, however, he was struggling with how to vote because he knew the applicant had been through a long process and he had reduced the size considerably from what he originally brought in. Chairman Perez stated that the floor area ratio on the 2,200 square foot house on the street that had been referred to several times to was 36% and the applicant's ratio would be 41%. He said it was a really difficult decision before the Board. The Board then discussed whether they were going to actually vote to approve or deny or whether they should just give the applicant further direction. Mr. Shutt interjected and asked the applicant whether he would prefer an actual vote or further direction from the Board. Ms. Spengler replied that since he might fall under the moratorium if the Board voted for denial and he had to resubmit, he would ask that they give him direction at this time. After further lengthy discussion about the size and massing of the house and about the roof, the Board decided to vote on this item. Motion/Findings It was moved by Maura Dersh, seconded by Joanne Peart and approved 4 to 0 (Ms. Lake, Mr. Miller, and Ms. Schatz absent) to continue with direction the Certificate of Appropriateness for 112 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Historic District, based upon the following items: 1) Break up the east elevation; 2) Reduce the square footage to make it more compatible with the street; and 3) Modify the roof line to reduce massing. C. North Del Ida Estates Lot 4 - 111 NE 6th Street (Formerly 106 NE 7th Street), Del-Ida Park Historic District, Andrew Spengler, Owner. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex parte communications on this item. He said he had spoken with Mr. Spengler on this item also. 11 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Ms. Alvarez advised the Board that the item before them is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a new two-story residence and landscape plan located at 111 NE 6th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District. Ms. Alvarez said that,just as the prior project, the property, located in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, previously contained a contributing one-story, single-family dwelling and detached, single-car garage. During its meeting of August 3, 2005, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and recommended approval for the demolition of the existing structures based on the fact that they appeared to have very little architectural or historical merit. Ms. Alvarez advised the Board that this property was previously a part of six (6) non- conforming lots which have since been reconfigured and replatted into four (4) conforming lots. The subject lot measures at a width of eighty-two feet (82') and a depth of one-hundred twenty feet (120'). The Staff report for the replat, which was reviewed at the HPB meeting of June 15, 2005, stressed that the layout and design of the four (4) proposed single family homes `....will be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to desiqn and massing in relation to the surrounding area.' Ms. Alvarez pointed out that this is the first time this project has come before the Board. The project consists of the construction of a two-story, single-family residence containing 5,452 total square feet, approximately 4,242 square feet of which is under a/c and the building foot print calculates to approximately thirty-four percent (34%) of the property. She said the design takes a combined inspiration from Resort Colonial Revival, Plantation and Bahamian architectural styles. Ms. Alvarez went on to describe the project in further detail and then reviewed her design analysis for the Board, concluding that the current submittal does not meet the intentions of the components used to review for compatibility, appropriateness and compliance. Therefore, based on the analysis above and throughout the staff report, positive findings cannot be made with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Applicant's Presentation Mr. Andy Spengler, owner of the property, then addressed the Board. He stated that this is the first time the Board is seeing this proposal but that they had tried to use a lot of the comments from the previous submittals to create what would be appropriate for this lot. He said it was another two-story house with many Key West elements including a low pitched metal roof. He described how the garage was set back as far as it could go on the lot and that it would be barely visible from the street. He pointed out the setbacks for the house and said they had setback the second story even further (almost fifty-one feet) to minimize the impact that the second story would have on the streetscape. Mr. Spengler stated this was a very simple, basic design with a lot of architectural features. He said the pool would not be visible from the street and again mentioned how far the house was setback. Public Comments Mr. Hayden Burrus, 10 NE 6th Street, addressed the Board said he wanted to address some specifics regarding the proposal Mr. Spengler had just submitted. He said the 12 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 drawing was very deceptive as there are no others homes in the drawing but it was obvious that he was trying to build four two-story houses in this area with square footage in excess of four thousand square feet (4,000 sq. ft.). He further stated that this drawing did not depict what this block looks like and urged the Board to disregard it as representative of what the area will look like. Mr. Burrus said much had been said about what a hardship it was for Mr. Spengler to have to come back before the Board repeatedly with his projects but pointed out that it was a hardship for the neighbors and citizens to have to come to the meetings over and over and state the same thing over and over—that the houses are too big. He said if he reduced it by fifty square feet (50 sq. ft.) each time and came back in twenty-five (25) more times, it's still too big each time. He also said it was Mr. Spengler's job to come before this Board to get approval but that the neighbors that have to keep coming in to fight the project have their own jobs and that they should not have to keep coming in to fight these projects. He further stated they should not have to fight to preserve their historic neighborhoods and sacrifice time out of their lives while it is part of Mr. Spengler's life. Mr. Burrus further said that it was apparent that the majority of the neighbors were opposed to these projects. He said maybe some of the other developers, or neighbor/developers or friends of Mr. Spengler may have spoken in favor of these projects but the immediate neighborhood was overwhelmingly against it. He said that he would ask that the Board consider what the residents want, as they are the ones the Board represents, not the developers. Ms. Toni Del Fiandra, 14 Dixie Boulevard, then addressed the Board and said that the house just west of the one proposed is approximately one-thousand square feet (1,000 sq. ft.), is a contributing structure and is on multiple lots. She said there is another small house on the adjoining lot. She said there is a ranch-style house across the street that has been for sale multiple times and she had wondered many times when someone might purchase it then the lost next door, demo the existing structure, join the two lots and build another very large house. Next Ms. Lois Brezinski, 110 NE 7th Street, addressed the Board and said she had moved into the historic district assuming all who lived or built there would have to adhere to certain guidelines. She said the guidelines refer to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area and that the Board had to know that the proposed house was not relative to the other homes in the area. She further stated that it was obvious the neighbors want small homes, that if someone wanted to build large homes they should go to other areas of the City. Ms. Brezinski said the residents of the historic districts love their little homes, their little yards and way of life and they want to preserve it. Ms. Livia Landry, 701 North Swinton Avenue, said she agreed with Ms. Brezinski regarding what the residents want. She further stated she thought the guidelines had enough information that decisions could be made about the design of these type projects. She said she is concerned about the value of her contributing home as she thought the value of her home would decrease if these projects are allowed to move forward. Ms. Landry said that they bought this house because it was protected and asked when someone was going to defend the value of her home. She said she thought the proposed houses were beautiful and would be fine on an acre lot, but to have four of them right together is too much. She also asked that Mr. Spengler meet with the neighbors to discuss the proposals. 13 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Mr. Rob Mannweiler, 109 NE 7th Street, stated that Mr. Spengler builds beautiful houses, but that these are just too large for this neighborhood. He asked that Mr. Spengler compromise on the size. He said the average size of the house in Del-Ida is seventeen hundred square feet (1,700 sq. ft.) and this project is just too large for this area. As there was no one else who wished to speak, Chairman Perez closed the Public Comments. Staff Rebuttal Ms. Alvarez stated that if the Board was to vote in favor of continuing with direction on this project, she wanted to make sure that all of the conditions in the staff report would be dealt with, as well as any others the Board might add. She also pointed out that, as per the part of the LDRs that were being used as guidelines, this project has no visual compatibility in the historic district. Applicant Rebuttal Mr. Andy Spengler then reminded the Board that when he looked at this property initially it was six (6) fifty-foot (50 ft.) lots, as was much of the neighborhood. He pointed out that there were six (6) out of sixteen (16) homes that had been designated as historic and would, therefore, be protected and not demolished to make way for "McMansions". He said they had tried to deal with the concerns that had been raised and he still thought the architectural elements would be something that would be appreciated fifty years from now. Board Discussion Ms. Peart pointed out that there were three (3)two-story homes on 7th Street but not one two-story house on 6th Street. Ms. Reich said the proposed house had a wonderful design by a great architect but, in two words, it is "too big". After some further discussion it was decided a vote should be taken on this proposal. Motion/Findings It was moved by Ms. Peart, seconded by Mr. Dersh and approved with a 4 to 0 vote to continue the Certificate of Appropriateness for 111 NE 6th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District with direction, based upon a failure to make findings with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, with suggestions one through eleven (1-11) as listed in the Staff Report, and address staff's recommendations as contained in the Staff Report.. IV. Reports and Comments Public Comments Ms. Livia Landry, 701 North Swinton Avenue, stated she wanted to speak about lot five. She said the lots may be fifty feet (50 ft.) but many of the homes, contributing and 14 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 otherwise, are on multiple lots. She said many people had purchased adjacent lots so they would have more space. Mr. Hayden Burrus, 10 NE 6th Street, stated he thought the Board heard at this meeting how passionate the residents are about this issue. He said that they are more tired of coming to these meetings than the developers are. He again stated they are just trying to make a profit. He then thanked the developers for bringing in these projects because, in doing so, they had united the community and the group "Save Delray" had been born. Mr. Burrus again told the Board that they represent the residents, not the property owners or developers. He said the residents will increase in their aggressiveness of support of their concerns. He said they were pleased that the Board had not approved any of the projects, but they had not denied them either. Ms. Patrice Fitzgerald, 1610 NW 2"d Avenue, stated that Mr. Spengler is not just a developer, he is a resident of the community. His children go to school in Delray, he lives in this area (although not in Del-Ida) and he is passionate about what he does. She said he was bringing beautiful homes before the Board because he cares. She said that in today's market, it did not make sense to purchase a plot of land and build or live in a two-thousand square foot home. She stated that if he was doing new construction with historic elements to it, it was because he was targeting the type of buyer who would care about the historic features and area. She closed by saying again that Mr. Spengler had proved that he is not just any developer, that he is a caring member of the community. Board Comments One of the Board members commented that she had visited Mr. Spengler's design showcase houses and they were beautiful. They said they all agree they are well done, they just have a problem with the scale. Ms. Peart said that someone had asked her if the Del-Ida group had a meeting with the City about the guidelines stating they were from another district and they wanted to be invited to that meeting. She said if a meeting was held prior to ending the moratorium the representatives from the other districts wanted to attend. Staff Comments Ms. Alvarez advised the Board there would be an appeal to the COA for 711 North Swinton Avenue that was approved at the March 1, 2006 meeting. She said there are actually two separate appeals and they will be heard at the April 4, 2006 City Commission meeting. Adiournment There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for March 15, 2006 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on September 4, 2008. o. Denise A. Valek Executive Assistant/Board Liaison If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 15