Loading...
HPB 08-16-06 ���■�� AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: August 16, 2006 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 338 NE 1st Avenue (Waksmacki Building), Old School Square Historic District, Perez Design, Inc., Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Waiver Requests for the construction of a mixed use building. III. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Reports from Historic District Representatives • Board Members • Staff IV. ADJOURN Warren Adams Posted on: :August 10, 2006 <4 ,� AGENDA (P,a Y ��P HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: August 16, 2006 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 338 NE 1st Avenue (Waksmacki Building), Old School Square Historic District, Perez Design, Inc., Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Waiver Requests for the construction of a mixed use building. III. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Reports from Historic District Representatives • Board Members • Staff IV. ADJOURN v(/Altfiet2 ,4g4md Warren Adams Posted on: :August 10, 2006 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING_ DATE: August 16, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: W. A. ITEM: Waksmaci Building (338 NE 1st Avenue)—Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness Associated with a Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Waiver Requests for the Construction of a Mixed Use Structure. GENERAL DATA: Owner/Applicant Elegant Kitchens&Baths, Inc. -- .-.Agent__ Perez,De_sign,_lnc. Location West side of.Northeast 1st Avenue, approximately 220' south of Northeast 4th Street. Property Size 0.15Acres N.E. 5TH Future Land Use Map OMU (Other Mixed Use) Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) _ Z Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD (Old School N.E. 4TH ST. Square Historic Arts District) w COST East: CBD (Central Business OFFICE District) z South: OSSHAD (Old School > ,•.,. Square Historic Arts District) Q • West: OSSHAD (Old School " Square Historic Arts District) w w Existing Land Use Vacant Q Q Proposed Land Use Construction of a mixed use structure. N.E. 3RD ST. Z 0 cn � o (!) f z U w z z A. • ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is approval of the following development proposal aspects for the Waksmacki Building located at 338 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): • Class V Site Plan; • Landscape Plan; • Design Elements, and; • Waiver Requests The subject property is located on the west side of NE 1st Avenue, between NE 3`d and 4tn Streets. BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 19, Block 65, Town of Delray and contains approximately 0.15 acres, all of which is vacant land. The property is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District), and is located in the historic district of the same name. Records do not show a structure ever having been located on the lot. The action now before the Board is approval of the site plan, landscape plan, architectural elevations, and two waivers. PROJECT DESCRIPTION; The development proposal incorporates the following: • Construction of a 4,646 total square foot, two and three story, mixed-use structure, and; • Installation of associated landscape plan. New Construction The subject property measures fifty feet (50') in width and one-hundred, thirty-one feet (131') in depth. The proposed development consists of the construction of a 4,646 square foot,mixed- use structure measuring approximately thirty-four feet (34') to the mean roof height and consisting of two-stories with a partial third story situated to the rear of the structure. The first floor contains approximately 1,591 square feet of office space, 272 square feet of storage and 80 square feet of residential space, while the second and third floors contain a combined total of 2,296 square feet to be used as a single-family residence. The overall architectural style is Vernacular, consisting of Hardiplank siding and a 5-V crimp, mill finish metal roof. Aluminum, single hung windows of a 2/2 configuration are proposed throughout with paneled, aluminum shutters and shutter-dog hardware. The main entry consists of a pair of divided light, French doors. The exterior color scheme consists of 'Summer. Tree Peach' for the siding, White for the windows, fascia, columns, railings, and doors, and 'Cornstalk' (light green)for the shutters. Landscape Plan The landscaping consists of 2 Magnolias and a Gumbo Limbo to the front of the building and 2 Silver Buttonwoods adjacent to the rear car parking area. Other plant species include Redtip 338 NE '1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 Cocoplum, Double Alexander Palms, Crown of Thorn, Green Island Fiscus, and Confederate Jasmine. Waivers The development proposal also includes waivers to the following sections of the Land Development Regulations: 1. LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), which states that all parking, except for single family homes and duplexes, shall be located in the side or rear yard or adjacent to a rear alley. The applicant proposes a circular driveway allowing for two (2) parking spaces located within the front yard and required front setback. 2. LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), which requires a five foot (5') landscape strip between off- street parking areas or other vehicular use areas and abutting properties. The parking at the rear of the property, along the alley, is situated between two landscape strips measuring two feet nine inches (2'9") and three feet, three inches (3'3"). SITE PLAN ANALYSIS The subject property is zoned OSSHAD. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(A), the OSSHAD is a mixed use district which is intended to: (1) Provide for mixed uses of residential, office, and commercial activities, with an emphasis on the arts, that will encourage the restoration or preservation of historic structures and, yet, maintain and enhance the historic and pedestrian scale of the area; (2) Stimulate greater awareness and pride in the City's architectural heritage, and create an atmosphere and feeling of"Old Delray Beach"; (3) Improve the environmental quality and overall livability of this Historic District and stabilize and improve property value therein, and; (4) Allow uses which promote preservation and adaptive reuse of all structures within the District. COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to that portion of the development located in the OSSHAD zone district: Required Provided _ Building Height (maximum) 35' 34' Open Space 25% 31 Maximum Lot Coverage 40% 33% Setbacks • Front 25' 25' • Side Interior(North & South) 7'6"' 7'6" • Rear 10' 33' Development Standards Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(F)(5), the floor area for the third floor shall be limited to 50% of the second floor area and the building setbacks or planes of the façade are offset and varied to 2/18 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF • HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 provide visual relief. The proposed third floor contains approximately 565 total square feet, while the second floor contains approximately 1,898 total square feet. Therefore, the proposal is in compliance with this requirement at 29.7%. Special District Regulations Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(H)(1), residential units within a structure containing permitted non-residential use(s) shall not use more than 50% of the gross floor area of the structure within which they are located. The proposal has a total area of 4,646 square feet and contains 2,296 square feet of residential use which is 49.4%. The proposal is therefore in compliance with this requirement. Parking The following LDRs apply: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), all parking, except for single family homes and duplexes, shall be located in the side or rear yard or adjacent to a rear alley. No such parking shall be located in the area between any street and the closest building or structure. Where there are existing buildings or structures, the Historic Preservation Board may waive this requirement during the site plan review process, provided that it is determined that compliance is not feasible and that the character of the area will be maintained. If approved, such parking shall be substantially screened from off-premises view by a hedge or decorative fencing. The proposal includes 6 parking spaces, 4 of which are accessed from the rear alley and 2 of which are located between the street and the building. The 2 front spaces will be screened by Crown of Thorn, Trinette and a Gumbo Limbo. A semi-circular drive will allow vehicles to exit in a forward manner to NE 1st Avenue. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a), all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 sq.ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. This requirement may be reduced to one parking space per 400 sq.ft. of total floor area, or by at least one space, where there is a mix of residential and non-residential use in the same structure. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(a), single-family detached residences require two spaces per dwelling unit. As per the applicant's letter of June 27, 2006, the first floor storage area will be used as part of the office area. The total office area therefore is 1,863 square feet which requires 5 parking spaces. The dwelling unit requires 2 parking spaces. A total of 7 spaces are required and the proposal includes 6. LDR Section 4.6.9(F)(1) allows a reduction in the number of parking spaces when, upon receipt and acceptance of special documentation, it is conclusively demonstrated that a reduced number of parking spaces will accommodate a specific use. The body which acts on the attendant site plan may reduce the parking requirements accordingly. The applicant is requesting a reduced number of parking spaces with regard to this section of the LDRs and has submitted a letter of request and the building floor plans as special documentation. The letter states: The building floor plans clearly indicate that the reduced number of parking spaces (six instead of seven) will accommodate the commercial use within the building because of the following reasons: 3/18 338 NE is`Avenue, 2006-170-SPF • HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 • The actual square footage of the commercial space without the storage area, which is 1,591 SF, requires four parking spaces'. As this proposal has an inordinately large storage area associated with the commercial use (272 square feet), this request can be supported. Per LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2)(a-b), each required parking space shall be accessible at all times. Access which conforms with minimal aisle standards and which includes maneuvering area so that a vehicle must be able to enter and exit the parking area onto a street or alley in a forward manner shall be provided, except in the following situations: (a) When the land use is a single family detached dwelling, a townhouse (fee simple ownership), or a duplex; (b) When the parking is adjacent to an alley and the parking space and alley have a combined minimum depth of 42' and a minimum width of ten feet (10') and the location of parked vehicles does not impair sight distance of pedestrians or vehicles utilizing the alley; The combined depth of the alley and the parking space is 42 feet therefore the proposal is in compliance with this requirement. Waiver Requests As previously noted, the following waivers have been requested: 1. LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), which states that all parking, except for single family homes and duplexes, shall be located in the side or rear yard or adjacent to a rear alley. No such parking shall be located in the area between any street and the closest building or structure. Where there are existing buildings or structures, the Historic Preservation Board may waive this requirement during the site plan review process, provided that it is determined that compliance is not feasible and that the character of the area will be maintained. If approved, such parking shall be substantially screened from off-premises view by a hedge or decorative fencing. The proposal includes 6 parking spaces, 4 of which are accessed from the rear alley and 2 of which are located between the street and the building within the front setback. The 2 front spaces will be screened by Crown of Thorn, Trinette and a Gumbo Limbo. A semi- circular drive will allow vehicles to exit in a forward manner to NE 1st Avenue. 2. LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), which requires a five foot (5') landscape strip between off- street parking area or other vehicular use areas and abutting properties. The parking at the rear of the property, along the alley, is situated between two landscape strips measuring two feet nine inches (2'9") and three feet, three inches (3'3"). Signs: As the first-floor is to be used for office/commercial space, the details of any proposed signage must be submitted. This is attached as a condition of approval. Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.8, site lighting is required to be provided. The proposal includes the installation of Cyclone CN5502 wall mounted lighting fixtures. The black aluminum fixtures will be installed on the structure approximately 8' 8" above ground level. In accordance with 4/18 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 LDR Section 4.6.8, a photometric plan has been provided which complies with the requirements of this section. Sidewalks: A paver brick sidewalk and spun concrete lighting are to be provided on NE 1st Avenue. This requirement has been added as a condition of approval and must be shown on the plans. Pineapple Grove Main Street Redevelopment Plan: The Pineapple Grove Main Street Neighborhood Plan (The Plan) contains several design guidelines that address redevelopment efforts within this area. The following is an analysis of the applicable design guidelines: Overhead Power Lines: Overhead cables (electric, telephone, CATV) are required to be placed under ground whenever feasible. A condition of approval is attached that, where feasible, all overhead utility lines (including the alley) are placed under ground. The Pineapple Grove Design Committee submitted a letter of support for the proposal dated March 30, 2006 subject to the condition that the decorative shutters are in direct proportion to the size of the windows. Right-of-Way Dedication: Pursuant to LDR Sections 5.3.1 (A) and (D) and Table T-1 of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, the following table describes the required rights-of-way and the existing rights-of-way adjacent to the subject property: Right-of-Way Required Existing Proposed Required Dedication Pineapple Grove Way 60' 50' 50' 0' NE 1st Street 55' 50' 50' 5' NE 1st Avenue 60' 50' 50' 5' Alley 20'or dominant width 16' 20' 4' The City Engineer has stated that a 2' right-of-way dedication along the alley is required and a 5' right-of-way dedication along NE 1st Avenue is required. Copies of recorded right-of-way dedications must be submitted and the dedications must be accepted by the City Commission. Site Plan and Engineering Technical Items: While the revised site plan has accommodated some staff concerns; the following items remain outstanding, and will need to be addressed prior to building permit submittal (unless stated otherwise): 1. No building permit will be issued until all dedications are recorded. 2. Remove all civil details from the architectural plans. 3. Health Department permits are required for this project. Provide copies of the water permit. 4. Verify limits of 6"water main along NE 1st Ave and show on plans. 5. Provide copy of certified topographic survey. 6. A 2' right-of-way dedication along the alley is required. Provide copy of recorded right- of-way dedication. 5/18 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF • HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 7. A 5' right-of-way dedication along NE 1st Ave is required. Provide copy of recorded right- of-way dedication. 8. Provide certified exfiltration trench test results. 9. Existing 2"water main along NE 1st Ave may need to be upgraded. 10. Provide asphalt paving cross section. 11. The sidewalk along NE 1st Avenue is required to be pavers. Match existing design for Pineapple Grove area. The Site Plan shows the sidewalk as being concrete. 12. Engineer is to field verify location, size and depth of existing City of Delray Beach utilities prior to submitting Final Engineering Plans. 13. Provide on the plans current City of Delray Beach standard construction details as applicable. 14. All connections to existing water mains shall be made while the water main is under normal working pressure. If this cannot be accommodated, the design shall incorporate special provisions such as line-stops to minimize the impact on existing customers. 15. Show limits of trench repair for installation of new water main. 16. Indicate on the plans the location pigging wyes. 17. Provide on the detail sheet the City's standard Fill and Flush detail. 18. Material size of water main in the City of Delray Beach is 8 inches. Material of proposed water main is to be Ductile Iron Pipe or C-900. 19. Provide copy of approved Landscape plan. 20. A certified engineer's estimate will be required for all City maintained improvements. A 110% surety and 2% engineering inspection fees will be required. A Financial Guarantee and Agreement for Completion of Required Improvements is required. This agreement can be obtained at www.mydelraybeach.com. For additional information see Section II of the City of Delray Beach Minimum Construction Standards. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy and the return of the 110% surety a 10% warranty surety will be required. 21. Provide a detailed description of how each of these comments has been addressed with next submittal, along with two sets of revised plans to the Engineering Department, 434 S. Swinton Avenue. 22. Additional comments may follow upon provision of requested information. WAIVER.ANALYSIS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Parking Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), all parking, except for single family homes and duplexes, shall be located in the side or rear yard or adjacent to a rear alley. The applicant proposes a circular driveway allowing for two (2) parking spaces located within the front yard and required front setback. The applicant has submitted the following narrative in support of the waiver: "The intent of the project is to create a single occupant, mixed-use building that looks and feels like a single-family home. Mr. Wally and Susan Waksmacki would like to live 6/18 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF • HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 and work in the historic district...they want to build, attached to their residence, a small (1500sf) show room where they are going to see customers by appointment only...Because they see their customers on a 'by appointment only'basis, Wally and Susan do not need the traffic and exposure of a commercial street." Analysis While the proposed development is not solely a single-family home, it does contain a single- family residence component. The parking spaces at the front meet the required residential parking component. Additionally, the addition of a circular driveway would add to the residential feel of the property within the mixed-use historic district. Therefore, positive findings can be made to the waiver request for parking located in the front yard. Landscaping Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscaped barrier shall be provided between the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area and abutting properties. This landscape barrier shall be located between the common lot line and the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area in a planting strip of not less than five (5)feet in width. "The project provides...landscape islands around the parking lots on the west side of the property. These widths have been reduced in order to accommodate parking on this very small property. In addition, we are unable to provide tree with the island, as such tree will conflict with the existing power lines. As we have experienced during the previous hurricanes, FPL is very weary of trees being planted in close proximity to power lines." Analysis The parking at the rear of the property (along the alley) is situated between two proposed landscape strips measuring two feet nine inches (2'9") and three feet three inches (3'3") in width. While the landscape strips measure less than the required width, the buffer area is still provided at more than half of the required width. Therefore, positive findings can be made to the waiver request to reduce the landscape strips to two feet nine inches (2' 9") and three feet three inches (3' 3"). LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS The following Landscape Technical Review item remains outstanding, but is addressed in the form of a waiver: • Per 4.6.16(H) (3) (d) a landscaped barrier shall be provided between the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area and abutting properties. This landscape barrier shall be located between the common lot line and the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area in a planting strip of not less than five (5) feet in width. This space has not been provided on both sides of the parking row adjacent to the alley or the circular driveway in front. DESIGN ELEMENTS Comprehensive Plan Objective A-12.1 of the Comprehensive Plan, offers that to assist the residents of the City in maintaining and enhancing their neighborhood environment, the City shall take steps to ensure that modifications in and around the neighborhood do not lead to its decline, such as those described in the following policies. 7/18 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF • HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 Policy A-12.4 The City will provide planning and technical assistance to implement neighborhood-supported initiatives aimed at preserving the character of existing residential areas. Such assistance may involve the formulation of regulations that would limit size and scale of new homes to be consistent with the existing structures within a defined neighborhood, and analysis of the housing inventory to determine if the area qualifies for designation as a historic district, and similar measures. Design Elements LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-k), "Development Standards"provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The Board shall consider the following: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non- contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of height, front facade proportion, proportion of openings (windows and doors), rhythm of solids to voids on front facades, rhythm of buildings on streets, rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections, relationship of materials, texture and color, roof shapes, walls of continuity, scale of building, directional expression of front elevation. The following criteria have not been met: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district.. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that: Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. (Standard #3) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and 8/18 338 NE 1'1 Avenue, 2006-170-SPF • HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (Standard #9) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. (Standard #10) Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines o For buildings where additional height is allowed, stepping back the upper stories may help to minimize the difference as viewed from the street. oAll infill must be compatible with the surrounding buildings and yet must be differentiated from the historic building stock. oThe height of any new building should be similar to those of other buildings along the streetscape. oThe new construction should be compatible with the width of the surrounding buildings. o The relationship of new construction adjacent to significant historic resources can either enhance or detract from the historic setting of the district. oThe character of the massing should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. oRoof forms and pitch should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. The proposed mean height of the roof is 34' and the height to the ridge is approximately 37' 6". The property to the south is 2-story, to the north is a 1-story cottage and to the rear (west) are mainly 1-story properties. The lots across NE 1st Avenue are currently empty but will be developed as 3-story townhomes. The third story has been set back approximately 35' 6" from the first and second story façade and this should limit the impact from NE 1st Avenue. However, there is concern that the third story will be overbearing to the adjacent properties, particularly the one-story structures to the north and rear (west). The roof pitch of the third floor should be reduced, the overall roof height should be lowered and roof lights should be installed. The covered balcony area on the west elevation should be removed which would then step back the third floor from the west elevation. This is noted as a condition of approval. The scale and mass of the building appear to be suitable on the front elevation as the third story is stepped back and there is a 2-story structure to the south. There is concern, however, over the increased massing of the third floor on the north, south and west elevations. This massing could be reduced by the above condition of approval. The structure will be constructed from Hardiplank siding and will have a 5-V crimp metal roof. Hardiplank siding is an appropriate material for this style of house as it has a similar appearance to wood siding but also identifies the structure as being of new construction. Metal roofs have been approved for similar style buildings in historic areas. The windows and balcony rails will be aluminum which will also identify this building as being of new construction. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. 9/18 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map and Comprehensive Plan Consistency, Concurrency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. At its meeting of May 7, 2002, the City Commission made positive findings with respect to the Future Land Use Map, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Concurrency provided conditions of approval are addressed. However, the following is provided: Section 3.1.1 (A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a FLUM (Future Land Use Map) designation of OMU (Other Mixed Use) and zoning designation of OSSHAD. The zoning districts are consistent with the Future Land Use Map designations. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(A)(1), mixed use of residential, - office and commercial activities is to provided with in the OSSHAD. Thus, positive findings can be made with respect to Future Land Use Map consistency. Section 3.1.1 (B) -Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste, provided that all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval are addressed. Section 3.1.1 (C) -Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions provided, that all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval are addressed. Section 3.1.1 (D) -Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided that all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval are addressed. Comprehensive Plan Policies: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable objectives or policies were noted: Future Land Use Element Objective A-1 - Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate and complies in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is complimentary to adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs. The property is a vacant lot and therefore, there are no special physical, historic, or environmental characteristics of the land that would be negatively impacted by the proposed mixed-use development. The development will be complimentary with the surrounding mixed- use developments and residential properties while providing a customer base for area businesses on a year-round basis instead of seasonal, which provides economic stability for the area. In terms of fulfilling remaining land use needs, the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan states as follows: 10118 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF ' HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 One of the most important objectives of the City's overall housing policy is the establishment of housing in the downtown area. In the years since adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan the downtown has changed from a somewhat sleepy, seasonally oriented shopping district to a vibrant year-round retail, service, and entertainment area with an active nightlife. A critical missing element is a significant housing development. The City recognizes the importance of providing housing in close proximity to shopping, employment, and transportation, and the need to have a residential base to support the businesses in the downtown area. The proposed development will help to fulfill this stated land use need, and is therefore consistent with this policy. Future Land Use Element Policy C-4.4. — The City supports the efforts to revitalize the Pineapple Grove Main Street (PGMS) area, and the use of the Main Street approach: organization, promotion, design, and economic.restructuring. While the CRA is the lead support agency for the PGMS organization, the City will provide technical support and assistance through the Planning &Zoning and Community Improvement Departments. The Pineapple Grove Main Street Neighborhood Plan contains several design guidelines that address redevelopment efforts within this area. These items were previously discussed under the "Compliance with LDRs" Section of this report. Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 — Bicycle parking and facilities shall be required on all new development and redevelopment. Particular emphasis is to be placed on development within the TCEA Area. Bicycle parking has not been provided and has been added as a condition of approval. Housing Objective A-12: To assist residents of the City in maintaining and enhancing their neighborhood environment, the City shall take steps to ensure that modifications in and around the neighborhood do not lead to its decline, such as those described in the following policies. Housing Policy A-12.3: In evaluating proposals for new development or redevelopment, the City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. The applicants are in the kitchen cabinet business and they stock their products in a warehouse outside the historic district. The commercial element of this proposal is for use as a small showroom where they will meet customers by appointment only, therefore, the traffic volume should be low. The project is located within an area that consists of the traditional road grid system. This system is conducive to traffic distribution, wherein, automobiles have a diverse choice of options to navigating the downtown area. Motorists are able to navigate the local grid street system to avoid congestion in order to reach collector and arterial roads such as Pineapple Grove Way, NE 1st Street, NE 1st Avenue, NE 2nd Street, Swinton Avenue, NE 4th Street/Lake Ida Road, Atlantic Avenue, and Federal Highway. Given the diffusion of vehicle trips, it is unlikely that adjacent neighborhoods will be negatively impacted by the additional traffic. Section 2.4.5 (F)(5) - Compatibility(Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and 11/18 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bordered to the north, south and west by the Old School Square Historic Arts District zoning district and to east by the CBD zoning district. The adjacent land uses include: to the north, south, and west single family residential and commercial uses. The lots to the east are currently vacant but will be developed as residential properties. The mixed-use development proposal will enhance the aesthetics of the subject property together with the neighborhood. The traffic volume will be low as customers will be seen by appointment only. The applicants will also live on the property, which is to be encouraged as the Old School Square Historic District needs residents due to the number of small houses that have been converted to business uses. REVIEW BY OTHERS Pineapple Grove Design Review Committee With reference to their letter of March 30, 2006, the Design Review Committee reviewed the proposal and recommended approval of the development proposal, subject to the condition that the decorative shutters be in direct proportion to the size of the windows. Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) At its meeting of April 13, the CRA reviewed the proposal and recommended approval. Courtesy Notice: Courtesy notices have been provided to the following homeowner's associations, which have requested notice of developments in their areas: ■ Neighborhood Advisory Council ■ Progressive Residents of Delray (PROD) - President's Council ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The proposed mixed-use portion of the development will further enhance this section of NE 1st Avenue and bring more residents to the Old School Square Historic District. The proposed use is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations. Positive findings can be made with respect to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) regarding compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding properties. Positive findings can be made with respect to compliance with the Land Development Regulations . provided the conditions of approval are addressed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V site plan (2006- 17-SPF), landscape plan, design elements, and waivers for the Waksmacki Building located at 338 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request, and 12/18 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF • HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 approval thereof, meets criteria set forth in Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan, subject to conditions of approval. C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V site plan (2006- 17-SPF), landscape plan, design elements, and waivers for the Waksmacki Building located at 338 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request, and approval thereof, does not meet criteria set forth in Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Waivers 1. Recommend approval to the City Commission the waiver request to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), which requires that all parking, except for single family homes and duplexes, shall be located in the side or rear yard or adjacent to a rear alley, based on positive findings. 2. Recommend approval to the City Commission the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), which requires that a 5' landscaped barrier be provided between the off- street parking area or other vehicular use area and abutting properties, based on positive findings. Site Plan Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V site plan (2006- 170-SPF) for the Waksmacki Building located at 338 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request, and approval thereof, meets criteria set forth in Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Board reduce the number of required parking spaces from 7 to 6. 2. That the details of any proposed signage are be submitted. 3. That a paver brick sidewalk and spun concrete lighting are provided on NE 1st Avenue and the details are noted on the plans. 4. That, where feasible, all overhead utility lines (including the alley) are placed under ground. 5. That the City Commission accept a 2' (two foot) dedication from the alley and a 5' (five foot) dedication from NE 1st Avenue from the subject property prior to site plan certification. 6. That all Site Plan Technical Items are addressed and three (3) copies of the revised plans are submitted. 7. That a bicycle rack is provided. 13/18 338 NE 1 St Avenue, 2006-170-SPF HPB Meeting August 16, 2006 8. That notification is received from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division that the proposed development meets traffic concurrency. Landscape Plan Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Landscape Plan (2006-170-SPF) for the Waksmacki Building located at 338 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following Landscape Technical Items: 1. That a landscaped barrier 5' in width is provided between the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area and abutting properties. This space has not been provided on both sides of the parking row adjacent to the alley or the circular driveway in front but is subject to a waiver request. Design Elements Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated design elements (2006-170-SPF)for the Waksmacki Building located at 338 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.18, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the roof pitch on the third floor is reduced, the overall roof height is lowered and roof lights are installed. 2. That the covered balcony area on the west elevation is removed to provide a step back to the third floor from the west elevation. Report prepared by: Warren Adams Attachments:Appendix A, Appendix B, Survey, Site Plan, Architectural Elevations, Landscape Plan 14/18 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF Appendix A, Page 1 APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: With respect to water and sewer service, the following is noted: ➢ Water service will be available to the site via lateral connection to a proposed main along the interior of the property from an existing main along NE 1st Avenue when all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval are addressed. ➢ Sewer service exists to the site via an 8" sewer main located within the alley. ➢ The location of existing fire hydrants are noted on the engineering plans. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to these levels of service standards. Streets and Traffic: The applicant submitted a traffic statement that indicates that the mixed use development will generate a net of 43 average total daily (AM and PM) trips onto the surrounding streets. Notification has not yet been received from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division that the proposed development meets traffic concurrency. A condition of approval is that this notification is received. The subject property is located within the Coastal Exception Areas of Palm Beach County and therefore meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County with respect to the residential units. The subject property is also located within the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, and OSSHAD zoning districts, as well as the West Atlantic Avenue corridor. The TCEA was established in December, 1995 to aid in the revitalization of downtown, with a purpose of reducing the adverse impacts of transportation concurrency requirements on urban infill development and redevelopment. These revitalization efforts are achieved by exempting development within the TCEA from the requirements of traffic concurrency. A positive finding can be made with respect to traffic concurrency. Parks and Recreation Facilities: The Open Space and Recreation Element of the Comprehensive Plan indicates in its conclusion that "The City will have sufficient recreation facilities at build-out to meet the adopted standards': A park impact fee is collected to offset any impacts that the project may have on the City's recreational facilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, a park impact fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of a building permit for each unit; the fee will be $500.00, as only one dwelling unit is proposed. 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF Appendix A, Page 2 Solid Waste: Trash generated each year by the single family residence and the 2,350 square feet of commercial space is 8.10 tons. Per the Solid Waste Authority, the trash generated by this proposal can be accommodated by existing facilities. Therefore, a positive finding with respect to this level of service standard can be made. Drainage: Preliminary drainage plans were submitted which indicate that drainage will be accommodated provided that all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval are addressed. School Concurrency: The School District of Palm Beach County has approved the Concurrency Application. Therefore, a positive finding with respect to this level of service standard can be made. 16/18 • 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF Appendix B, Page 1 APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent Will be met once a bicycle rack is provided in the plans. C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent F. Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent 338 NE 1st Avenue, 2006-170-SPF Appendix B, Page 2 G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent 18/18 • • ;,A,.4EASAREO oweMSKvS ARE ME SAYE[NUT O0101KWNO=. .. • • .` • A A r"-�ao m.nt � s u. s o • m • • SCALE 1.:20' N }Block Structi. ure "gob ... :,,Power Polo, LOT 18• • BLOCK • art • • r .nt 125:95,(A1) e • . t/z! END r31.00TB):' I/9. FN IRON ROD" CLF ROAR • *tar : !:c7 f' / ''S rN„ I • o J1 0.04`. • gip. POWER I r`T�•4j o �y'� ov.2}.70' • • r ^ ay.2f.70' -rtaa<ment h • . .O ,LOT.to .VACANT LOT W S • Easement a ;o O z" s•r 'once Easement ' O'-� ev1.10 $ � "C .',�.. • h ; — "..Polo • PER T �O K N," t r- PLAT ,J0 Woo 20.80' =• ENO,W :..u.Vertical Datum BO 0.20 ". _--- Iev.21.J0' • 0�;�.• O) •' Z im1 • •.Book • - .. ---- _ -- • I/2'FND . • 4'Wood .. , '.. r • • IRON ROD n Fence `:. 131.OQ�(p) ^' FND NAIL • ..25. 04) •0 .. ... re:. U3/8504 o &.DISC- • . S,• 0. • • x N as_L r 1 LOT 20 .ttl ai 1 A.f, BLOCK t1S At I nF1ol• • CERTIFIED.TO: r L 1 , • ' z•i ': SUSAN'AND WALLY WAKSMACKI .` ' . .LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ;' _ • LOT 19,SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 65 OF.DELRAY$EACH,ACCORDINOTO THE'PLAT ?• THEREOF•AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2,PAGE 20 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OPPALM • NorE BEACH COUNTY,FLORIDA :. Oi/.5LR6EY WAS'PRE.ARED FCR CQVI(YANE4 a 1i', i1, ,.; • NorW O ravcaisAnru nca eAv URPOSES IT IS �. • anawc wawwlnaeuArBE oerAwmnear !IV) .SUBSURFAC><fEl n/RESNOr LOCI RD •, OF BOUNDARY SURI/EY ' scnL� t 20' NOTEs/REHSIONs cERnr7unavII Reaaa wdOrf Mr w a-rsWOW TEwrut MAUR i AS sr FOUNDED /99 J �..FL000 ZCNf.• wew.statsr, r:•S SCatcru .c }. BASrS.D BEAR/NM1. DRAWN'BY. SAGO -� sesames°otoos owH"`roramorwr rtwnrer,REeeaaIeaw.vrRaamvAt.s.atnoes• E • NGINEERING r7 • K Aanuerm sr samw,t r`0'1°v eoaxor 'MO MAPPERS n owru aen-+,rtnew AavxsneAmE EASEL/NE A/E:I SURED ANGLES ��. CHECKEQ�BN R.AS r xutamn�rnt�'A A7V![j lBASE FLOOD'a:: BENCHMARK REfERENCES FIELD'BODK: FOLDE/t � � nwsuw l�EORIO,4 lT G sers r srelmv.nar/>�aaeat sr AND PACE N/A; "u : ' �.". 64.)Q� LAND SEJ E N .wre twuana owerQ,varal't'E •M/ oe/ a SN Slofe of f7arrdo sere' 1 PARTY CHIEF Ll/GO vrowv waauv,aer u m a, kro/o+9onOL }o{St.Mo •r.Ka.4879 B00A RATCW, f7OROA'J34J2 ...I'..,a NE A4£NUE,DELUYBEAU{FLORIDA s*t ;.SUR.VEY DATE.;,2,�` K•��? ,+I' t1e'm°�:""'t' • y,��„��•+�>aru�a <ioe• ++eww..,>.oz. 'EB-65J0 02-05 417-0700 LB-6439 ,•::, /.'2;=7 4.0 c Aar wet war necw ne s04411W mo,...r a j :,,• • . o!rnowu Irv®yr.ar.uo M•!os .' ,Atg NO:0E-03-[M'B' SHEET Na J •`'� Y' • r 4 • or r)AIC DATA Ilirez Desi gn Arn.wiasPtaa r.¢4 7,771 la,DAtno tl.P to Aov HAM Pa PC MTa)LIl>]9 e'^ ... now Pa PAC(VIZ LOUT ---—...—....--.i Q Ntorb for cmaAA kmWV)too s •'+ram Po'[m for MOW(ss09 tr„Ir wrm"`t. 0M0K DIIIct CIA MUM e�e ,coventea Art. .Lys QTI.MW, 'J MP V. ar 3 0•<M sux T Am I, •LOCI 0om ON rook" LMif•Jt,f At S P to s•LrA0 w n mrt I P P rp 7770 CI nAt.,IMAC•LYACCIj N�KIKP¢SQaa� =y2 r rot/P SAm,"pKo .Mee • AP• AKA pawn)•LOU V.col Jan P art oi or V ,... n. BULGING AREA c/.LCUUTIOK9 ? = n R. r mtaw +ww •.Pula IMO<iu on r. - ary "ouue 5 4 re __. rr0 'aduw a n.Pnc CIP CO wr. J r. be CO {ff ACPp co Imo TOT<Mt Illf t' ,F A�MALT 'fr � MI SP.QiHCE _...._,• �,,/ _� C'; 7770 MI V No A sA1K➢q �� r NY �/ z L d d,e•f IIMPIMIlri Ft1 OtC 4 W Tia"�ciAr,Aawwm. I i• rtIDPAt OM r.A IINCIMt CLIMA K Mu=IP-KIDPM1Y VA(7 1. IF DWI.K,,IA VW MP X%P DC MIS ft.MCA CAIK sotCNK Imo ...... i •i� ff • .ql KT AK LOMA a, 0 rpru MP rAt A{{oI(p aDJanu? _ � - y rvru��n to f(m s nut •�. .�!l.w xn —Li Y Aoe�Olp irxfrylu, SITS PLAN IPA A• :a ut.�n•.r-e' .. ... DII.IIO rn,..,M.,aJ_!J ry • ^n ' a PI A' C1 ,ice :IF A o.. o rr•r.I L 1 E"/ SITE PLANF .I ` •f � iM1pf'1 • _777yZ'n K I k$ 1 ti . I d ,<l iStr: 1` Jae; r3 c LOCATION AMP A100 "/ NO 1 I i f rg.1 Cr I f 1., I y.Y M I.f M Id a 1 I . I I a , . . 4 r //"\ . g 1 0 I 0 9 I�lK !3. r-Y m $ ® - e . y tt°'� O. ` N Z m 11 Y 03 r o 3y _ . ''' r 911111111111111111U11111111114 i1111111111111111111@11111111111YIIIY1111111 1 , " w O S •I =irii� i`�°r��� ii } zti r= p Mk ,I. ®rnrrie ld cm .• 1111111111110111' -®' 5 1G-a. . -lnunnnununnn111110pp nnnn111111111 m r•. I� n r -La . a a r l u.r.r r r-r ,IIILa } 13T FLOOR to o Vi • j PLAN ma } r. r. + �}�¢ FIRST FLOOR PLAN' A ' .. n.1w^ll.- t. �I/ y Id ROOK 000WJRW IeaE➢pLR a..,.n n. I • IP`yl w • .r.hrt.0 w-sI. rd rd•r oP'.Yril. oli i • 1M FLOpI OO'OWRWIL eREi%L2. • M.fy�.. 4_ 1, o-Yw M rfYl ` M rrw IW r ay wrY r.... r.r.. • •14 I•r Y ld fd r -I-f d_I Md�y r ld r.f Iur fd nr-f i' J rJ .' ..r i..r.l .d rJ ml 'd ld f OI.A4r Mw ` M1i.u.. !•f t,r: J d r y..O j1' IS f-f fd NOM CR PPP Pawln OM l.Wl wtl N6f1u1m•uaY OW WA .... Mt f fr'�f mm - [t M•.nw � • • • A210 r I • Design RC nm..n a :.•ti..�ee. i • ^^ . • .� • rr rr ♦1 x-a • jrs. " Coall..� I • •� •11011111 1111 IIIIIIIII 11111111 IN II HI.__.I"II•lm II . mom.nl nn II l__!,l I III I I II, I II III IIIIII IIImnnlllnil I r11 IIIIIfhIII11 I111I 1__,_,I II U al. R a V. ® 0.1111110 C'0 bOQlEl. y CI Z O 133 a 0 " • 1 'T • Ir.. a WtLe•! A � +— nuunmmmm� • Z W 3 l IRO ' Wnw Y CO vr ® , t ti 3 ,' fr� il ® ' /1 0 RI . P....rilA . mr,,,g.,' ; • .,. 'S I .tonomilnlnnnlmimm�nllnninniumnmmmmnlnnown moonnnnnmmnmina R_Jnm r___..:� • U U• U U U U'U U U' U U -U • 1,14,..... m • n.! I, r.r l mw Ifs' 2ND FLOOR ' PLAN 01 SECOND FLOOR PLAN • r•MI._.,„ ` ra.Ir•1 v.•.1•-a. i fr n..n v_•n1 ...Ile n1r_M<Ws,= 2r0 FLOOR 1WDON/FRWE 60-EDULE �1�I� re.tr r ..1N rI. eW Ire M P l rms......W r..e /1.I._fr . 7n0 FLOOR DOOR/FiW.EUL.E J-I Y.' f q f.AV: Jr. c. co r.r EA.T Ian' — !. fa r•u..c r 1x• e �w rr In '1r!t I arm.lox _ _ __ __ .m I,VS' r .aces a o . IV ..1n.rw KJA • A211 r) Perez Design *A tane idnx now• . NI . • /i 1 N i •nW'n n n n'•n n n n n' n n n n n n n n n ntn a1LJLJI_J_ LJI .11-1LJI_JJJL_IL_ 'JLJ_J_11—LJLJI_._,LL___iLJI_J_AL_IL:ILJIC - • Bunn nnnwnnnmm�annnu ' ....-. •t-� O • II • H II 11•. - di11 F II , t .~ Fi-- —r� — W L 6. me k' I �il :e Inn +. inn y t 4 �� ii llnnennne nnwnnwen_—nieeinninuunnwnwwenmwwemewwn m 6' { ri �. wi .ate • 1 i. • • 1 o n..1r,11 F n'1f',I'•n .if—Ir 1rT if lr•-n'�r-n-4�Ir'—IC 11'L-n'�Ir' U.:U U U U. U U U y U U U U LL J U U .II U U. 1U• U U, U U U U U U' U U :U U URD FLOOR • PLAN `, • • • • • • /r-?? .a' THIRD FLOOR PLAN Dr!.e• �i.• .f /ii/ Q wX.•re. ao-rrn..x S #i Ord ROOq MhDOW • � vo 1 Q r /FP�.ME sdu+nn n I I•k rd R:Oae DOOR/FIUIIE 9C11®UE ri• `i 3 —"+ I+..n+e r • r ninon . v "I- c, so y-r Ii r •,y,,,. ,`y •, ' ... IDS • A212 • ri • • 10 .. Design di -._. I - _ .er............. • mammy • Vie Cow . M, Mll�t�l�l = '1 iiIiJL.i .., t • ;se; ; IIIII�� I ;' .'.,� I • o. 0 — , +�!�s� \. o v ... ir.� I. .,xh`Ct •,tc,4.,h <;:unrr.,nrv•u.\v . z W n 03• Co he Oh 09 FRONT ELEVATION.EASTm Li o • • u�'—..uiiA-• -•h E7 -n• .-- — M.fW.L"P91 - —.._ .---,;- .. .• ..: • • •l• . ` MJ .., 1 IIEl liiiiiji . .0 r114 0 ILI.�V.( r.• Li M ,11 4°®...+_ _w„, ___ lliiii��i� fl�o llli�plll lif itiftl! —l..i--.,g.• -l• • .-• ..= r.12 . • o... q.. I-- �� .� gFgF'' .ao.�, 6 1 j I1'.��.1 ■= 0'n�p M"°' EXTERIOR Y w MJ i D lfii 11-1 -IN ELEVATIONS • h 01 ,I_ s a., - 'IL.'u 0. w•. n u.r ..v-.J00 • A roc au Di • p Y w ''. f Y 1I III !, iI,IIIII III•=I ". /�/✓��9,��y�,�, /� �j/%////,%;,/,�/ l .i 4REAR ELEVATION WEST • A300 .. • • • a �,¢^M, Pgrez Design - tr r �- — — — — — - - - - - tea, _Ifl . > c e s e s ��-s- e a s� � _r jL III_ phi wouil 1 ¢,,,nv,•J •c� ti "vcvt,�s / ✓x[.Jlti i ,e. a zF ` I',®®1Q a Y W CO 33 ti taws* a� r • cm :Ja. % //� �7../.%%O.11l�//.d/rr / ' ." / Oajf,O.�'"/l` 0/u / ff..%///l////// y�'��fd////l//,. z ell/./O�..ffDO/O%O/O///�/ 5,�/Jl0•d%l%///%O%//f/�/fifa o �// LEFT SIDE ELEVATION•SOUTH ` ( M.a/.•.r-r - A. iota WS* • �( a .Kr I °..ortal 'EXTERIOR M"MJ ELEVATIONS gym: ' 11 � d�� 1,11III 1 VV Mk Imp WO I�� _ 0� n r I Imo _®_ ' • ,onn Mf =i h Noa ` �1� aI'01 i 111 mitimmoi.m wMl 4. � - __--- ®�lYl®fit• 1 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION•NORTH/ f /##/// .0'Ii/,,rq / ,may //aaY/#,a'//#/9// //,-///i//,/ ////m9 //, ' �-#//i 2// s 1.,,.•..• A301 f • a r . , . 1 ci i irD \!.. cIr r is LR. OT 18 • .—.T. ..ar,,, JERRY TURNER ASSOCIATES n ,w. ® Cir of oaloa INC. riFSUC� Q 1 xe • HIB ® LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 0 _ { LAND PLANNING 4 I -_•_ , ENNRONIAENTAL DESIGN —1--- M — <•:: p 000a yooa000acooaoaaaococc 'LQOCIIe�i+ia\OOi000L I' •' °° . _ �f 1 I r•: • t I • 1 I al ,r:MEM m—�I� ,+0•41 raj I:7;.I 'i':'.[ °:n...mg y or a0.0.1 a••D •+1[' v11 aia tia /6�/ `' 1•al3 vv)-se It 1 �// 4— 6., ri. -*CY; • /. A2GL I a ::o.e}n win • 1 1 rI ; TEN hL.1'� v �� :::: F ,00141& IV m L� WAKSMACKI D•. s! 1 lrRl x' , 0 n.vr >:iri. O 0• 0 I u r..� 0 ' . 0 I I m h,{ o •I�•49,r' o • E. BUILDING '' all 17 o r'' V" m ' v y 4, �\ Ox-fie ,: .I Tttlt'."y + '00 ..eornrt 1 W od • v \ � „.: • ; wd \ * 1-421.01?‘ I.l,•:. I 1 L I j' \� v � ;Eelexroao .. • ?elru�o . . . . .'4I..: II I I ..� ...9 I' ''� vr..r)eaaNNv.__ vane.:.• . • arrd.Eo3,b;f: [::.:.;I•:;•.: Ifh•l fi00:00'O:O cro-4000AOoeloVirear$OVI O:000otioo003."oliL'OO.00:Ooo.o.O:O:01:13.Q'OOA.O.o:OA:o"__: t00 {"•of q'. I {t 334 N.E.1st Avenue 1 t�(fi } I j G 1 I - • —� - Delray Beech,Ft. C n lky ,'•'• to ® •© An © •,ares 3/1/136 k V; 'Cr CIF • iiii an cos per eWf menb erm 11 . 1w�, }; Iq�•ylrj�j , tittF LANDSCAPE DATA PLANT LIST y 1 +vf i Y N1[RI0R LANDSCAPE DATA KEY Sclenlllc Home Common Nom. ' Ott HT SP REMARKS •KS <f TOM SITE AREA(e.se,ins ewe/ •.)SS Sr •CL .Blire4r0 simoruba Gumbo Limbo I 12' 6'.• romLL PANED ARCA Cos Pr FIN OOP) 1.,2)tr ,yt (Ypp to i. ,t'r t• torveto INTERIOR u044220 Otcu[ u Y • CHY . CRrysobalanu•Koos,'Reatl,' Redl10 Cocopum .121 24' 8' •1' I k,ey:., ,j,.4t M TOTAL INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA P110VI090 20S7 Sr CT Euphorblo'nee'American Seoul/ Crown of Thorn 62 E. 0' }"1 ff � ,+�.s TOTAL NrtROR IR[[S R[Oun[0 • 2 m[[t Titus mlcrocapa'Croon island' • Caen Inland fkue 1 f.4 i `J`Rl`alY 3 5• TOTAL NTCKOR lEts PROVIDED =nms Cif • 00 10' le' F ?'' l .1,�tI p. NIB• Hibiscus op.:Seminole Perk' HDM1cut 6lontlerd a 8• a• +,`1 11t 4(la'�`i'�`Tti+ R S" IEInYE1CR IANDSEAP[DATA JAS T aclielrt rTnum emNold•f Confederate Joemin. 1a { YS. 1:,::.:.•� MAC Mon Dt oa° • 2 1236' l. Nh: dl'nr 11 e•v WNW APO ADJACENT q olio vlrVylnland Ma 2 t2' 6' • .(f r I A ADJACENT r0 ROw/onKR PRCP[Rtt OJ thump.,yonlMala . Oro nos Jasmine ' 10 24' Ie' d 1:i �;t }y �+ x�N,'• Tout v[R u[rtR LANosuR[uu R[aulR[D IV Sr PED • PtKhospermp degans Double Alexander Palm 0 16'' ,N r4 ,I f ) };,Yil I foTAL PERNCRR LANCStu[AREA IRONDE, le)v • ROB PNOenlx sane oV RODtl enll Palm w�tl.Q t•.• I TP[E/w V R[ouIRW 2 6' 4' THAI•Trunk ��1 I Uti f- 40104 m[[s R[OUR[o S 1R[[s 59 Soh.lTorpu•rectos'Wows' Silver Buttonwood 2 12' 6' .ov...� ata+ev...�e " 5 Ly•,{" TOTAL 1RC[S PnoVIpEO 5 TREES VAR SchelOero orborlcolo%Knelt. Trinette 6S 24' 18' • I CT DT 4 :•I `i .' �•tc j 7 WE Micro•orlum ecolepentlrlum wort fern ? p 40*SE"V r role ro eE iu4 .i;T 4 ;RplrpmcrZi P( 014 2omio 8orldono Commie • t6 8' 4 •.t•¢ 0W �W{{ Iw•tl,•,d ,,. PLANTED D PERNCUER e:NRRIOR LANDSCAPE AREA )9)Y 6 18' 24' iM•e14 02116ge `jk'e. 'D:�!1,2'•h'•I•:x;.'•.;. PLANTED AREA REWIRED n p t: 1.{',7 ' S PLANTED AREA PROVIDED 11�n p •nitt a6 4 •'?,; NARK PLANT DATA , . •' Landscape t {• e$�, ` 200 04 AlL 01MEl�t ruM,ui104104ETote[NARK • c1i4 {f' �4'r„ TOTAL RCOURC0 IRKS Rf • Plan • TOTAL uADK 1R[[S AWNED 1 teas L'T1 !f r 1 it fotAt NAnvE ta[Es e•owo[Dl' �,111EEs. .}3 -.( TOTAL MIMEO SxRUe AND GROUND COVER ARCH ) Y. • 1 '�' y 1 Y HARK AREA R[WIRCO >D r • i } FT •1 g1V.1 r {�'f NAIIK ARDA PRCNO[D )•.v • . 4 w r j 4�i6,1 Mt 140.2••••• .•No.ii•mi••••• ky r2 '(•T•/l$Sk Ma.y-h�- 1- • • it1tDoeLs w[n ro• • ,yto4itr }ghUifxThi ^} y Er 5 • •i'G kSINa u. 4 J' tD^' r ) Lb '.... ... _ .._ +, L-1 gip. • �..._ a rk, _._ . deers oft1 1_ ,E • D 9 t. • • Perez Design Architecture Planning&Design Incorporated AA-002886 Memo: To: Amy Alvarez—Historic Preservation From: Jason Skinner CC: Date: 9/13/2006 Re: Waksmacki Building—338 NE 1st Avenue Please review the following responses to the conditions of approval listed in the letter dated September 08,2006: 1. Below are the responses to the Architectural conditions for the approved Class V Site Plan: a. There are no plans for signage at this time. Any signage proposed will be designed, detailed and presented under a separate application. b. Spun concrete lighting is not required by the Pineapple Grove Main Street Association or the Planning&Zoning Department c. Where feasible, all overhead utility lines(including alley)will be placed underground. d. It is noted that City Commission must accept a 2' dedication from the alley and a 5' dedication from NE 1st Avenue from the subject property prior to site plan certification. The right-of-way dedications have been shown on sheet A100. e. All Site Plan Technical Items have been addressed and (3)copies of the revised plans have been included with this package. f. A bicycle rack has been indicated near the parking at the rear of the property. A detail of the bike rack has also been added to sheet A100. g. We have received written notification, from Palm Beach County, the project meets the requirements of the Traffic Performance Standards. The letter from Palm Beach County was written to the attention of Scott Pape and a copy of the letter has been included as part of this package. 4205 West Atlantic Avenue, Suite 304 Delray Beach,FL 33445 Phone.561.279.2006 Fax.561.279.2801 } r 2. It is noted that the Landscape Plan is approved subject to the City Commission approval of the waiver request to reduce the required five foot(5')wide landscape barrier provided between off- street parking area or other vehicular use area and abutting properties. 3. The third floor porch has been revised to contain a post at the southern corner. The new post matches those used on the front porch and is shown on sheets A300 and A301. 4. All Site Plan Technical Items have been addressed and (3) copies of the revised plans have been included with this package. •Page 2 0(0-034] RECEIVED ��!l�C151' L4GIVEUryry 1 D • i May 15, 2006 • 4tORIO Mr. Scott Pape Sr. Planner-Dept. of Planning &Zoning Depairtment Of Engineering City of Delray Beach um public Works 100 N.W. 1 Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33402 Ha box 21229 Wade Palm Beach,FL 33416-1229 `, RE: Waksmacki Building ' (561)684.4000 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCESTANDARDS REVIEW. www.pbcgov.com Dear Scott: • • ■ The Palm. Beach County Traffic.Division has reviewed the traffic.statement for the proposed project entitled; Waksmacki Building, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The project Fahan Aea coaacy is summarized as follows: ,Board of Cottnty Location: West side of NE 1$t Avenue, south of Lake Ida Road. Commissioners Municipality: Delray Beach zbdy Masilatti,Chairman Existing Uses: Vacant Proposed Uses: 1 MF Residential Unit and 1,591 SF General Office. =die L.Greene,Vice Chairper8on New Daily Trips: 41 • Karen r Manus New PH Trips: 11 AM and 10 PM. Build-Out: 2010 Jeff Koons Based on our review the Traffic Division has determined that the residential component of Warren H.Newell *the proposed development is located within the county designated Coastal residential Mary McCarty Exception Areas, and the non residential component constitutes insignificant on the roadway network, therefore, the project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Burt Aaronson • Palm Beach County. No bullding.permits are to be issued by the town,•after the build- out date, specified above. The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the ProjectAggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, If you have any questions regarding this determination,please contact me at 684-4030. County Administrator Sincerely, ; Robert Wei8man OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER //7/Z) "'Pr • Masoud Atefi MSGE Project Revi= er-Tr= is Division cc: Pinder Tro : Consulting,Inc. File: General-TPS-Mun-Traffic Study Review -An quatOppornmity F:ITRAFFIC1malAdmin\Approvals1060507.doc 4pvnnattve Action Employer- ' PlfrIM4Z 'd�°''d68Lq' 0N Wd60:17 900Z 'Ll 'AeW • ~ ' Associates, Incorporated September 01, 2006 Randal Krejcarek City of Delray Beach Engineering Dept. 434 S. Swinton Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33412 RE: Waksmacki Office Bldg. —Responses to Engineering Comments Dated March 20, 2006. Dear Randal: We have attached the original comments letter of April 24th, and offer the following responses: Technical Comments: 1. No building permit will be issued until all dedications are recorded. Noted. 2. Remove all civil details from the architectural plans. See Architectural plans. 3. Health Department permits are required for this project. Provide copies of the water permit. As discussed, the existing 6" extends in front of this site. Accordingly, no water main installations and Health Department permits are required. 4. Verify limits of 6"water main along NE 1s`Ave and show on plans. Existing water main limits have been added along NE 1"Ave. 5. Provide copy of certified topographic survey. Attached. 6. A 2' right-of-way dedication along the alley is required. Provide copy of recorded right-of- way dedication. 2'alley dedication is shown along the alley. Recorded dedication will be provided prior to permitting. 7. A 5' right-of-way dedication along NE 1st Ave is required. Provide copy of recorded right- of-way dedication. 5' right of way dedication is shown along NE ft Ave. Recorded dedication will be provided prior to permitting. O:\word-docs\2004\04019-Waksmacki\Delray Response 01.doc 298 Pineapple Grove Way• Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 274-650o Fax(561) 274-8558 8. Provide certified exfiltration trench test results. See attached. 9. Existing 2"water main along NE 1st Ave may need to be upgraded. As discussed, this upgrade is no longer required. 10. Provide asphalt paving cross section. Asphalt paving section has been added to Sheet 3. 11. Engineer is to field verify location, size and depth of existing City of Delray Beach utilities prior to submitting Final Engineering Plans. Noted. 12. Provide on the plans current City of Delray Beach standard construction details as applicable. Current City of Delray Beach details as applicable are shown on detail sheets. 13. All connections to existing water mains shall be made while the water main is under normal working pressure. If this cannot be accommodated, the design shall incorporate special provisions such as line-stops to minimize the impact on existing customers. Water main connections will be wet tap connections and will not disrupt flow. 14. Provide copy of approved Landscape plan. Approved Landscape Plans to be forwarded when available. 15. A certified engineer's estimate will be required for all City maintained improvements. A 110% surety and 2% engineering inspection fees will be required. A Financial Guarantee and Agreement for Completion of Required Improvements is required. This agreement can be obtained at www.mydelraybeach.com: For additional information see Section II of the City of Delray Beach Minimum Construction Standards. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy and the return of the 110% surety a 10%warranty surety will be required. A copy of the cost estimate is attached. Bonding to be provided prior to final permitting. 16. Provide a detailed description of how each of these comments has been addressed with next submittal, along with two sets of revised plans to the Engineering Department, 434 S. Swinton Avenue. Included herewith. 17. Additional comments may follow upon provision of requested information. Noted. Yours Truly, Cecil Lunsford EnviroDesign Associates, Inc. Ext. 16 Associates,Inc. September 1, 2006 Waksmacki Office Building 338 NE 1st Ave, Delray Beach, Florida Page 2