HPB- 01-08-03 MINUTES `�,�.4 c� AGENDA
v = HISTORIC PRESERVATION
leke46 ��P BOARD MEETING
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
Meeting Date: January 8, 2003
Type of Meeting: Special Meeting
Location: Planning & Zoning Conference Room**
Time: 6:00 P.M.
The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a
disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity
conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior
to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening
devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers.
if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any
matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for
this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such
record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide
or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. REVIEW/UPDATE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES
A review/update of the current Historic Preservation Design Guidelines by the Historic
Preservation Board and a representative from Janus Research.
III. ADJOURN
Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner
POSTED ON: December 31, 2002
** Denotes New Location
MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
SPECIAL MEETING/PUBLIC HEARING
MEETING DATE: January 8, 2003
LOCATION: PLANNING & ZONING CONFERENCE ROOM
I. ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:15 P.M. Upon roll call it
was determined that a quorum was present.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott,
Rhonda Sexton, Jim Keavney, Francisco Perez-Azua,
William Branning.
STAFF PRESENT: Loretta Heussi
OTHERS: Ellen Uguccioni, Janus Research Consultant, Thuy
Shutt (CRA)
II. DESIGN GUIDLEINES UPDATE
Ms. Uguccioni gave an overview of the design guideline update. A review
of staff comments was also presented. Topics included: reviewing the
certificate of appropriateness process, the demolition process, storm
protection and shutters, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation, and variances.
Ms. McDermott mentioned the addition of conservation districts.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that without an ordinance in place that the city could
not proceed with the establishment of a conservation district and that the
separate design guidelines would be established for such a district when
necessary.
Mr. Perez-Azua discussed the improvement of the graphics from the
original and that additional graphics would aid in its ability to guide historic
property owners.
Ms. Uguccioni concurred and stated that new graphics will be provided.
Mr. Perez-Azua and Ms. McDermott stated that more information should
be provided for the historical overview.
Ms. Uguccioni concurred and stated that the new overview will be more
comprehensive in its development history.
Ms. Shutt asked if the Land Development Regulations will be amended to
include changes made in the design guidelines. She also stated that the
historic preservation design guidelines should be copasetic with the
design guidelines being prepared for the downtown area.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that an ordinance change would probably be
necessary which would require the Land Development Regulations to be
amended. Further she asked about the consulting firm working on the
project and stated that she will work to coordinate the two design
guidelines.
Ms. Caroline Patton (public) expressed her concern over the demolition
issue and how that would be addressed.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that it will be addressed, however, an ordinance
change may be required to alter the demolition process.
Ms. Jamison requested that a district update be completed to include the
West Settler's District.
Ms. Uguccioni concurred.
Ms. McDermott discussed the maps to be included and stated that she felt
a more user friendly version should be developed with the boundaries of
each district and each individually listed site clearly delineated.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that staff was coordinating the development of the
maps.
Ms. Patton inquired about the properties which were designated and how
the design guidelines may help historic property owners in general
regardless of their designation status.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that the design guidelines were universal in that
respect.
Ms. Elliott stated that more information could be included on sites around
the City for use as a guide to the historic properties. The Board felt that
such information was better suited in a guidebook rather than the design
guidelines.
Ms. Uguccioni felt that that information was provided in the surveys.
-2- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
Ms. Uguccioni and John Bennett (Public) felt that a designation process
should be added.
Ms. Jamison stated that the process for designating a district as well as
the certificate of appropriateness process should be included.
Ms. McDermott inquired as to whether a designation runs with the
property.
Ms. Uguccioni confirmed that it does.
Ms. Jamison stated that it is not in effect until approval by the City
Commission.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that it was specified in the City's historic preservation
ordinance and that owner's consent must accompany the request.
Kathy Appleton (public) requested that the Local and National Register
process be clarified.
Ms. Patton requested clarification of the ordinance and the demolition
process. The Board stated that clarification was requested from the City
Attorney's office by City Staff.
Ms. Shutt suggested that relocation of a building was an option.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that relocation was a means of last resort and that it
related to the integrity of the district as well as the building as to whether
relocation was appropriate.
Ms. Elliot suggested means to encourage local designation for buildings
up for demolition.
Ms. Jamison stated that only designated buildings could be eligible for a
stay of demolition per the direction of the Board.
Ms. Appleton requested clarification of the ordinance to ensure that the
Board could refuse a demolition request.
Ms. Uguccioni suggested that the Board make a motion to request such a
clarification.
Ms. Sexton suggested that the Board mandate that developers pay for
relocation fees.
Mr. Perez-Azua stated that such requirements could be requested during
the building permit process and the site plan approval process.
-3- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
Ms. Jamison inquired about new construction within the historic districts.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that compatibility must be in accordance with the
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation however, the new
construction style may be contemporary.
Ms. Shutt stated that the County guidelines had a good definition of
"compatibility" and that such a definition should be added for use in these
guidelines.
Ms. McDermott asked that better graphics be included in the "Architectural
Styles" section.
Ms. Shutt asked about the inclusion of the "Minimal Traditional" style.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that prominent Delray Beach styles would be
included and that line drawings would best represent the major
architectural characteristics.
Ms. Sexton inquired about which styles would be included and if historic
styles outside the districts would be included.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that all historic architectural styles either in or
outside of the districts would be included. She then inquired about
appurtenances and stated that such topics as walls, fences, etc. will be
included. Ms. Uguccioni also expressed concern that consistency of
materials be ensured when replacement in-kind was necessary and that
such issues as window repair and replacement be addressed with care.
Mr. Branning questioned the in-kind replacement of roofing materials.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that any such replacement should be done to match
what was originally there or use a prevalent material found in the area.
Ms. Sexton inquired about shutters and the materials to be used.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that issues such as materials and use of shutter
dogs would be addressed.
Ms. Uguccioni and Mr. Perez-Azua expressed concern over in-kind
replacement of windows and whether aluminum frame were appropriate in
any circumstance as the scale is obscured when using aluminum over
wood.
Mr. Branning expressed his concern over the expense associated with
replacement of wood windows.
-4- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
Mr. Perez-Azua stated that it was the owner's responsibility when
purchasing a historic building.
Ms. Shutt stated that replacement should only be mandated when
supported by documentation of original materials used.
Ms. Sexton requested that appropriate standards be included for signage
and that the Board would benefit from more direction.
Ms. Uguccioni led a discussion on pools and their location on historic
properties.
Ms. Jamison and Ms. McDermott expressed their concern for lighting
locations and whether decorative fixtures should be permitted on the
interior of a property if not viewed from the right-of-way.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that the issue will be addressed.
Ms. Jamison requested that fencing samples be brought before the Board.
Ms. Shutt stated that public art work in the historic districts should be
addressed due to the recent development of the Cultural Loop.
Ms. Uguccioni requested more information and stated that she will
research the topic further.
Ms. McDermott requested that further information be included regarding
landscaping requirements.
Ms. Uguccioni inquired about approved colors and the Board's color chart.
Ms. Jamison suggested that colors are a matter of personal taste and that
perhaps the chart should be eliminated for the use of test patches. Ms.
Jamison also stated that a review of the matrix be completed and that
landscaping proposed over the minimum requirements be addressed.
Mr. Bennett stated that the Historic Preservation Board works in the same
capacity that the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board (SPRAB) works
in that it should review all aspects of the project including aesthetics.
Ms. Uguccioni reminded the Board that their goal is to make decisions
based on retaining the historic characteristics of the City and not
specifically on its aesthetics qualities.
Ms. Jamison stated that the same guidelines will apply to all designated
properties.
-5- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
Ms. Uguccioni led a discussion on hurricane protection.
Mr. Perez-Azua suggested that impact glass may be necessary and that
the new code often requires it.
Mr. Branning inquired about ADA issues and whether the guidelines will
cover such issues as ramps and other exterior improvements.
Ms. Uguccioni concurred that they will be addressed.
Ms. Shutt stated that some information regarding the Community
Redevelopment Agency's (CRA) façade easement program should be
included.
Ms. Sexton suggested that the ad valorum tax exemption information be
included.
Ms. Uguccioni concurred.
Ms. Jamison inquired about the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that they will be listed and referenced where
applicable.
Ms. Jamison mentioned the inclusion of more images.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that in printing it may become a budget constraint
however, it was for the City to determine the number of illustrations to
include. Ms. Uguccioni also stated that a glossary was being compiled
from the City's Land Development Regulations (LDR) and the Historic
Preservation Ordinance.
Mr. Perez-Azua stated that there should be a cross reference between the
LDR's and the design guidelines.
Ms. Uguccioni also stated that an index and related appendices will be
included.
Mr. Bennett stated that such references such as the design guidelines are
most helpful when compiled in a binder for ease when updating or
amending.
Ms. Shutt stated that a subscription may be the best option in addition to
availability on CR-ROM.
-6- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
Ms. Jamison stated that a public meeting will be held to review the draft
and that copies will be made available prior to the meeting for all those
interested.
Ms. Shutt mentioned that the West Settler's Advisory Board Meeting
would be a good opportunity to present the draft as well.
Ms. Jamison concluded that representatives from each district should be
present and made available for comment.
III. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:25
P.M.
The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for
January 8, 2003, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on
February 19, 2003.
If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then
this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after
review and approval, which may involve some changes.
-7- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
SPECIAL MEETING/PUBLIC HEARING
MEETING DATE: January 8, 2003
LOCATION: PLANNING & ZONING CONFERENCE ROOM
I. ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:15 P.M. Upon roll call it
was determined that a quorum was present.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott,
Rhonda Sexton, Jim Keavney, Francisco Perez-Azua,
William Branning.
STAFF PRESENT: Loretta Heussi
OTHERS: Ellen Uguccioni, Janus Research Consultant, Thuy
Shutt (CRA)
II. DESIGN GUIDLEINES UPDATE
Ms. Uguccioni gave an overview of the design guideline update. A review
of staff comments was also presented. Topics included: reviewing the
certificate of appropriateness process, the demolition process, storm
protection and shutters, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation, and variances.
Ms. McDermott mentioned the addition of conservation districts.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that without an ordinance in place that the city could
not proceed with the establishment of a conservation district and that the
separate design guidelines would be established for such a district when
necessary.
Mr. Perez-Azua discussed the improvement of the graphics from the
original and that additional graphics would aid in its ability to guide historic
property owners.
•
Ms. Uguccioni concurred and stated that new graphics will be provided.
Mr. Perez-Azua and Ms. McDermott stated that more information should
be provided for the historical overview.
Ms. Uguccioni concurred and stated that the new overview will be more
comprehensive in its development history.
Ms. Shutt asked if the Land Development Regulations will be amended to
include changes made in the design guidelines. She also stated that the
historic preservation design guidelines should be copasetic with the
design guidelines being prepared for the downtown area.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that an ordinance change would probably be
necessary which would require the Land Development Regulations to be
amended. Further she asked about the consulting firm working on the
project and stated that she will work to coordinate the two design
guidelines.
Ms. Caroline Patton (public) expressed her concern over the demolition
issue and how that would be addressed.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that it will be addressed, however, an ordinance
change may be required to alter the demolition process.
Ms. Jamison requested that a district update be completed to include the
West Settler's District.
Ms. Uguccioni concurred.
Ms. McDermott discussed the maps to be included and stated that she felt
a more user friendly version should be developed with the boundaries of
each district and each individually listed site clearly delineated.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that staff was coordinating the development of the
maps.
Ms. Patton inquired about the properties which were designated and how
the design guidelines may help historic property owners in general
regardless of their designation status.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that the design guidelines were universal in that
respect.
Ms. Elliott stated that more information could be included on sites around
the City for use as a guide to the historic properties. The Board felt that
such information was better suited in a guidebook rather than the design
guidelines.
Ms. Uguccioni felt that that information was provided in the surveys.
-2- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
Ms. Uguccioni and John Bennett (Public) felt that a designation process
should be added.
Ms. Jamison stated that the process for designating a district as well as
the certificate of appropriateness process should be included.
Ms. McDermott inquired as to whether a designation runs with the
property.
Ms. Uguccioni confirmed that it does.
Ms. Jamison stated that it is not in effect until approval by the City
Commission.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that it was specified in the City's historic preservation
ordinance and that owner's consent must accompany the request.
Kathy Appleton (public) requested that the Local and National Register
process be clarified.
Ms. Patton requested clarification of the ordinance and the demolition
process. The Board stated that clarification was requested from the City
Attorney's office by City Staff.
Ms. Shutt suggested that relocation of a building was an option.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that relocation was a means of last resort and that it
related to the integrity of the district as well as the building as to whether
relocation was appropriate.
Ms. Elliot suggested means to encourage local designation for buildings
up for demolition.
Ms. Jamison stated that only designated buildings could be eligible for a
stay of demolition per the direction of the Board.
Ms. Appleton requested clarification of the ordinance to ensure that the
Board could refuse a demolition request.
Ms. Uguccioni suggested that the Board make a motion to request such a
clarification.
Ms. Sexton suggested that the Board mandate that developers pay for
relocation fees.
Mr. Perez-Azua stated that such requirements could be requested during
the building permit process and the site plan approval process.
-3- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
Ms. Jamison inquired about new construction within the historic districts.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that compatibility must be in accordance with the
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation however, the new
construction style may be contemporary.
Ms. Shutt stated that the County guidelines had a good definition of
"compatibility" and that such a definition should be added for use in these
guidelines.
Ms. McDermott asked that better graphics be included in the "Architectural
Styles" section.
Ms. Shutt asked about the inclusion of the "Minimal Traditional" style.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that prominent Delray Beach styles would be
included and that line drawings would best represent the major
architectural characteristics.
Ms. Sexton inquired about which styles would be included and if historic
styles outside the districts would be included.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that all historic architectural styles either in or
outside of the districts would be included. She then inquired about
appurtenances and stated that such topics as walls, fences, etc. will be
included. Ms. Uguccioni also expressed concern that consistency of
materials be ensured when replacement in-kind was necessary and that
such issues as window repair and replacement be addressed with care.
Mr. Branning questioned the in-kind replacement of roofing materials.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that any such replacement should be done to match
what was originally there or use a prevalent material found in the area.
Ms. Sexton inquired about shutters and the materials to be used.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that issues such as materials and use of shutter
dogs would be addressed.
Ms. Uguccioni and Mr. Perez-Azua expressed concern over in-kind
replacement of windows and whether aluminum frame were appropriate in
any circumstance as the scale is obscured when using aluminum over
wood.
Mr. Branning expressed his concern over the expense associated with
replacement of wood windows.
-4- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
Mr. Perez-Azua stated that it was the owner's responsibility when
purchasing a historic building.
Ms. Shutt stated that replacement should only be mandated when
supported by documentation of original materials used.
Ms. Sexton requested that appropriate standards be included for signage
and that the Board would benefit from more direction.
Ms. Uguccioni led a discussion on pools and their location on historic
properties.
Ms. Jamison and Ms. McDermott expressed their concern for lighting
locations and whether decorative fixtures should be permitted on the
interior of a property if not viewed from the right-of-way.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that the issue will be addressed.
Ms. Jamison requested that fencing samples be brought before the Board.
Ms. Shutt stated that public art work in the historic districts should be
addressed due to the recent development of the Cultural Loop.
Ms. Uguccioni requested more information and stated that she will
research the topic further.
Ms. McDermott requested that further information be included regarding
landscaping requirements.
Ms. Uguccioni inquired about approved colors and the Board's color chart.
Ms. Jamison suggested that colors are a matter of personal taste and that
perhaps the chart should be eliminated for the use of test patches. Ms.
Jamison also stated that a review of the matrix be completed and that
landscaping proposed over the minimum requirements be addressed.
Mr. Bennett stated that the Historic Preservation Board works in the same
capacity that the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board (SPRAB) works
in that it should review all aspects of the project including aesthetics.
Ms. Uguccioni reminded the Board that their goal is to make decisions
based on retaining the historic characteristics of the City and not
specifically on its aesthetics qualities.
Ms. Jamison stated that the same guidelines will apply to all designated
properties.
-5- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
Ms. Uguccioni led a discussion on hurricane protection.
Mr. Perez-Azua suggested that impact glass may be necessary and that
the new code often requires it.
Mr. Branning inquired about ADA issues and whether the guidelines will
cover such issues as ramps and other exterior improvements.
Ms. Uguccioni concurred that they will be addressed.
Ms. Shutt stated that some information regarding the Community
Redevelopment Agency's (CRA) façade easement program should be
included.
Ms. Sexton suggested that the ad valorum tax exemption information be
included.
Ms. Uguccioni concurred.
Ms. Jamison inquired about the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that they will be listed and referenced where
applicable.
Ms. Jamison mentioned the inclusion of more images.
Ms. Uguccioni stated that in printing it may become a budget constraint
however, it was for the City to determine the number of illustrations to
include. Ms. Uguccioni also stated that a glossary was being compiled
from the City's Land Development Regulations (LDR) and the Historic
Preservation Ordinance.
Mr. Perez-Azua stated that there should be a cross reference between the
LDR's and the design guidelines.
Ms. Uguccioni also stated that an index and related appendices will be
included.
Mr. Bennett stated that such references such as the design guidelines are
most helpful when compiled in a binder for ease when updating or
amending.
Ms. Shutt stated that a subscription may be the best option in addition to
availability on CR-ROM.
-6- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
Ms. Jamison stated that a public meeting will be held to review the draft
and that copies will be made available prior to the meeting for all those
interested.
Ms. Shutt mentioned that the West Settler's Advisory Board Meeting
would be a good opportunity to present the draft as well.
Ms. Jamison concluded that representatives from each district should be
present and made available for comment.
III. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:25
P.M.
The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for
January 8, 2003, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on
February 19, 2003.
If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then
this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after
review and approval, which may involve some changes.
-7- HPB Minutes 1/8/03
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
TABLE OF CONTENTS: DELRAY BEACH DESIGN
GUIDELINES
Acknowledgements
Credits
Masonry Vernacular
Section I. Bungalow
Purpose of Design Guidelines Minimal Traditional
Introduction Mission
Why Design Guidelines? Mediterranean Revival
A Brief History Monterrey
Historic Sites Survey Art Deco
Art Moderne
International
Section II. Ranch
Local Historic Districts and
Individual Sites Section V.
Design Principals
Old School Square
Marina Facades
Del-Ida Park Foundations
Nassau Park Roofs/ Dormers/ Chimneys
West Settler's Materials
List of Individual Sites Windows
Doors
Section III Shutters
Process and Procedures: Site Planning
Role of Historic Preservation Landscape
Board Parking
Historic Designation Criteria Fences and Walls
Local Historic Designation Signage
Certificate of Appropriateness: Lighting
Process (Alterations,
Additions/ New Construction) Section VI.
Certificate of Appropriateness: New Construction
Process (Demolition)
Appeals Section VII.
National Register of Historic Hurricane Protection
Places Nomination Process
Section VIII.
Section IV Compliance with the Americans
Common Architectural Styles: with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Frame Vernacular
Draft:Tables of Contents
Revision •
Delray Beach Design Guidelines
Page 2
Section VII.
Federal Tax Consequences
Section VIX.
Local Tax Incentives
Section X.
The Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation
Appendix "A"
Delray Beach Register of
Historic Places
Appendix "B"
Glossary
Appendix "C"
Resources/ Bibliography
Index
Prepared By:
Ellen J.Uguccioni
Janus Research,Consultant