The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB- 04-07-04 0,0 AGENDA P HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING w qY CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: April 7, 2004 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • February 4, 2004 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Ferrara Residence, 136 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Tony Keller, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a duplex on a vacant lot and an associated variance. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Ascot, 8 NE 2nd Street, Old School Square Historic District, Jeffrey Silberstein, Authorized Agent— Continued from March 3, 2004. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements, and waivers for the construction of an office building on a vacant lot. V. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Historic Preservation Awards VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff April 7, 2004 HPB Meeting Page 2 VII. ADJOURN Wendy Shay, Histpic PreservationPlanner POSTED ON: April 1, 2004 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: April 7, 2004 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Rhonda Sexton, Randee Schatz, and Jeffrey Silberstein MEMBERS ABSENT: Francisco Perez-Azua and John Miller, Jr. STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Brian Shutt I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Ms. Schatz at 6:02 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. Ms. Shay requested that a motion be made to amend the Agenda to table Item IV.A., Ascot based on the fact that Mr. Silberstein would have to step down and the Board would lose its quorum. She also requested to add Item V.A., Historic Preservation Poster Contest. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. Sexton, and passed 4 to 0 to table Item IV.A. until the April 21, 2004 meeting and add the Poster Contest as Item V.A. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Silberstein and passed 4 to 0 to approve the Minutes of February 4, 2004 as written. III. PUBLIC HEARINGS Ms. Schatz read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. A. Ferrara Residence, 136 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Tony Keller, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a duplex on a vacant lot and an associated variance. Historic Preservation Board Meeting April 7,2004 Ms. Schatz asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Ms. Jamison stated she spoke with Tony Keller regarding variances. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board and entered a copy of the project file and her resume into the record. Michael Weiner, Esquire, was present on behalf of the owners, Dr. and Mrs. Ferrara. He made a presentation and stressed his concerns regarding the right-of-way dedication, the necessity of a variance, and with differentiating the exterior material. Staff requested that a five foot (5') right-of-way dedication be recorded in order to be consistent with the development along NE 1st Avenue. Therefore, the variance was necessary. Mr. Weiner stated that the required findings pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(J) and Section 2.4.7(A)(5) as listed in the Staff Report were being met. Tony Keller, 200 NE 5th Avenue, stated that the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation relates to existing buildings. As the proposed building is non- contributing, the issue is not applicable. Ms. Shay stated that the Board has attributed this guideline to previous projects. She also stated that the design guidelines support the differentiating of the materials. Mr. Keller stated that a landscape plan will be provided and that the driveway and sidewalks will be brick pavers. Everett Jenner, Project Architect, stated that the Secretary of the Interior's Standards has been mentioned on three or four projects, but they do not apply to new construction. Ms. Schatz closed the Public Hearing and asked if there were any comments from the Board. Ms. Jamison asked Mr. Shutt if granting an easement for the five feet (5') of property is an option rather than dedicating five feet (5') of right-of-way to the City. Mr. Shutt advised that it is up to the City Attorney to make that decision. Ms. Jamison stated that she is opposed to the City taking property from a homeowner. Board discussion ensued regarding the open air porch and proposed materials, the five foot (5') dedication, and the reduction of the square footage of the proposed guest cottage. Mr. Shutt advised that the right-of-way dedication is a requirement noted in the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Schatz mentioned this is a Comprehensive Plan requirement as redevelopment of a property occurs and changes are made to the property. 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 7,2004 The proposed guest cottage may not exceed 497.25 sq. ft. In order to be consistent with the LDR's, the square footage needs to be reduced. Therefore, the cottage should be reduced by 18.75 sq. ft. Variance After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 4 to 0 to approve the variance for 136 NE 1st Avenue, Ferrara Duplex, to reduce the front setback from 25' to 20'. Certificate of Appropriateness It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. Sexton, and passed 4 to 0 to table the Certificate of Appropriateness for 136 NE 1st Avenue, Ferrara Duplex with the following direction: 1) That a five foot (5') right-of-way dedication is noted on the site plan and the deed accepted by the City Commission, prior to issuance of a building permit; 2) That one floor of the exterior displays a smooth stucco finish; 3) Submit exterior lighting details and note the locations on the building elevations; 4) That window details including muntin profile are submitted; 5) That decorative wrought iron shutter dogs are installed flanking each decorative shutter; 6) That a color scheme is submitted for the body, trim, and accents with samples; 7) That the guest cottage is reduced in square footage to a maximum of 497.25 sq. ft. and that the cottage is limited to use by members of the family occupying the principal dwelling or their nonpaying guests per LDR Section 4.3.3(Q); 8) That the proposed materials for the driveway, sidewalk, and pool deck are noted on the site plan; 9) That a detail of the proposed wall and fence are submitted; and, 10) That a landscape plan is submitted with the building permit that meets the intent of LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(2)(a-f). 11) That the building height is provided; 12) Note the railing detail and proposed materials; 13) Note the material for the columns and porch including ceilings; 14) Provide the dimensions of the roof including overhang; 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 7,2004 15) That the materials for the chimney are indicated; 16) Note the material of the walkways and sidewalk; 17) That the drawings are in 1/4 inch scale; and, 18) That any lattice or alternate material covering the crawl space below the building is noted on the plans and a detail provided. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Historic Preservation Poster Contest - The Board selected Tony Milanese, 12th Grade, American Heritage (first prize), Dawn Kelly, 9th Grade, Toussaint L'Ouverture (second place), and Frank VanAmburgh, 9th Grade, American Heritage (third place). V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments — None B. Report from Historic District Representatives — None C. Board Members — None D. Staff- Ms. Shay reminded the Board about the upcoming Preservation Conference and the need for volunteers. VI. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 8:00 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for April 7, 2004, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on July 7, 2004. Denise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 7,2004 0 (j)L--- V' MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: February 4, 2004 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Mary Lou Jamison, John Miller, Jr., Rhonda Sexton, Jeffrey Silberstein, Randee Schatz. MEMBERS ABSENT: James Keavney STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:07 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any changes to the Agenda. Ms. Shay advised that Item IV.A., Handelsman Yellow Building, is being postponed due to the fact that the applicant is out of town. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Jamison, and approved 5 to 0 to accept the Minutes for December 3, 2003 as written. III. PUBLIC PRESENTATION A. Recommended Modifications to the Delray Beach Land Development Regulations LDR Section 4.6.7—Sign Code Ms. Lula Butler, Director of Community Improvement, presented a summary of the suggested modifications. The Board collectively supported the modifications as proposed. Historical Preservation Board Meeting February 4,2004 IV. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Cason Cottage Complex Bungalow, 5 NE 1st Street, Old School Square Historic District, Bill Branning, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and an associated Class I Site Plan Modification for the construction of handrails. Chairman Perez asked if there was any ex-parte communication. There was none. Ms. Shay presented the project to the Board and entered the project file and a copy of her resume into the record. Mr. Branning presented a drawing of the handrails to the Board. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any questions from the public. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing and asked if there were any comments from the Board. The Board did not feel the design of the handrails was in keeping with the style of the cottage and suggested that they be modified to reflect a cross pattern with thicker posts and be painted green to match the trim. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 6 to 0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I site plan modification for the installation of handrails at 5 NE 1st Street, Historic Bungalow, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(f) and (g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines with the following condition: 1. That the design be modified changing the handrails to an X design in each section and the posts to 2" x 4". B. Tapas, 8 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Perez Architects, Inc., Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for elevation changes. Chairman Perez stepped down. Ms. Schatz asked if there was any ex-parte communication. There was none. Ms. Shay presented the project to the Board and entered the project file into the record. Staff recommended the sign be relocated to the first floor and the tile limited to a door surround or border. 2 Historic Preservation Board Meeting February 4,2004 Ms. Schatz inquired if there were any questions from the public. There were none. Ms. Schatz closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. There was much discussion by the Board regarding color and amount of tile that would be on the façade of the building. The Board requested that another rendering be submitted with different color samples (more muted tones). After much discussion, it was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and passed 5 to 0 to the table the item. Mr. Perez returned to the Board. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: None B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: None D. Staff Comments: None VI. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 6:55 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 4, 2004, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on April 7, 2004. Denise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 3 Historic Preservation Board Meeting February 4,2004 1 i - • HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD • CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT-- MEETING DATE: April 7, 2004-Continued from March 3, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IV. A. ITEM: Ascot—Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and Associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and associated Waivers for the Construction of an Office Building. CASON METHODIST CHURCH GENERAL DATA:. - �< Owner/Applicant Management Systems — N. 3RD SL N.E. -- 3RD ST. Worldwide Agent Silberstein Architects, Inc. Location SW corner of NE 1st Avenue j - and NE 2nd Street. ITATTORNEY Property Size 0.14 Acres BUILDING ,J Future Land Use Map OMU (Other Mixed Use) i� • Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School ��w W» RING �. OR. N.E. 2ND sr. Square Historic Arts District) 3 • Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD (Old School w it Square Historic Arts District D East: OSSHAD (Old School Square CITY w Historic Arts District HALL > 1 South: OSSHAD (Old School Square N.W. ,ST ST.¢ N.E. 1ST ST. Historic Arts District z West: OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District ' COCENTNR z Existing Land Use Vacant Proposed Land Use Office __ OLD SCHOOL Water Service Existing adjacent. SQUARE I • • Sewer Service Existing adjacent. ATLANTIC AVENUE :: '/" 1- f n . i S.E. 1ST ST.S.W. 1ST ST. _ o n • ' • 1 . . II - 1 S.W. 2N0 ST. S.E. 2ND ST. • IV. A. ITEM BEFORE THE ,BOARD -` The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 8 NE 2"d Street, Ascot, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class V Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; ❑ Design Elements; and, ❑ Waiver Requests. The subject property is located on a corner lot on the southwest corner of NE 2nd Street and NE 1st Avenue. BACKGROUND The subject property incorporates Lot 9, less the west 60' thereof, and the north 26.5' of Lot 10, less the west 60' thereof, Block 67, Town of Linton. The property contains 0.167 acres and is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). At its meeting of December 5, 2001, the HPB reviewed and approved a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a one-story single-family residence built in 1978, which was demolished in January of 2002. On February 20, 2002, HPB reviewed and approved a COA and associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements and variance for the construction of a two-story, 2,400 sq. ft. office building for Management Systems. The approved variance reduced the required side street building setback (east property line) from 15' to 10'. During its meeting of April 17, 2002, the Board reviewed and approved a Class II Site Plan Modification, including modifications to the landscape plan, and associated waivers for the previously approved Management Systems project. The Board approved the following three (3) waivers associated with the proposed landscape plan and site plan modification: (1) a waiver to reduce the required stacking distance along NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet-six inches (2'-6"); (2) a waiver to.reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet (2'6"); and, (3) a waiver to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent property to the west from five feet (5') to two feet (2'). These changes were made to accommodate an additional on-site parking space and to address an appeal of the Board's approval of the site plan in February by an adjacent property owner, due to the lack of sufficient parking on-site. However, the actual site plan modification and landscape plan were tabled pending the applicant's return to the Board for re-consideration on an original condition of approval pertaining to the dedication of five feet (5') of right-of- way for NE 1st Avenue. Meeting Date:April 7,2004 Agenda Item: IV.A. HPB Staff Report 0 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 2 The applicant returned to Board for re-consideration on May 1, 2002. The Board reviewed and approved the proposal with conditions including the dedication of five feet (5') of right- of-way along NE 1st Avenue. The right-of-way was subsequently dedicated and recorded, however, the site plan approval expired on August 20, 2003 and the project was never undertaken. The Historic Preservation Board reviewed a new Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements, and associated waivers during their meeting of March 3, 2004 for the construction of a 3,219 sq. ft., three-story office building on the property. The Board approved the associated waivers to reduce the required stacking distance along NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet-six inches (2'-6"); to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent western property line from five feet (5') to two feet (2'), and to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent east property line from five feet (5') to one and a half feet (1'6"). However, the Board tabled the Site Plan with the direction that the building is reduced in height to meet the 35' maximum height requirement of the OSSHAD zoning district and that the proposed elevator is relocated to the southwest corner of the building. The Board also directed the applicant to request in-lieu spaces proportional to the previous Management Systems Site Plan approval (certified on October 28, 2002). Therefore, as 25% of the required parking was accommodated via the in-lieu of program with the previous Class V Site Plan for the Management Systems Building, the same percentage or ratio must be provided with this proposal. It is also noted that no formal action was taken with respect to the Landscape Plan or Design Elements. The applicant is now before the Board for the re-consideration of the original proposal of a 3,219 sq. ft., three-story office building on the vacant lot. No modification shave been made regarding the height of the building or the location of the elevator. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. The development proposal includes the following: ❑ Construction of a 3,219 sq. ft. three-story, office building; ❑ Construction of a six (6) space paver block parking lot that includes one (1) accessible space and two (2) compact parking spaces; ❑ Request for five (5) in-lieu parking spaces and construction of seven (7) on-street parallel spaces with landscape nodes along with the construction of new 5' concrete sidewalks along NE 2nd Street and NE 1st Avenue; ❑ Installation of paver block internal walkways and associated landscaping; and, ❑ Waiver requests from LDR Sections 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1) and 4.6.16(H)(3)(a) & (d) for the reduction of the five foot (5') stacking distance and the five foot (5') landscape strips. HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 3 E RLAN AN A L.Y S I S COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The applicable development standards for the OSSHAD zoning district that relates to the proposal are as follows: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 36' 6"* Building Setbacks (min.) - Front (north) 25' 25' Side Street (east) 15' 10' - 5 11/16"** Side Interior(west) 7'6" 11' 3/" Rear (south) 10' 50'-5 5/16" Open Space 25% 40% ** A variance to reduce the side street setback from 15' to 10' was previously approved with the original site plan. *Building Height Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(J)(1), building height is defined as the vertical distance from grade to the highest finished roof surface of a flat roof or to the mean level between eaves .and ridge for gable, hip, or gambrel roofs. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(J)(2)(b), for buildings adjoining more than one street, the grade is established as the average of the mean elevation of the crown of the adjoining streets. When measured according to the crown of NE 2nd Street and NE 1st Avenue to the mean height of the apex of the roof and the eave of the third floor (designed as a shed dormer), the building measures 36'6". In order to meet the LDR requirement for height and the OSSHAD zoning regulations, the building must be reduced in height by 1'6". LDR Section 4.4.24 (OSSHAD-Special District Regulation): Parking Requirement: Pursuant to LDR 4.4.24(G)(4)(a) all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. This requirement may be reduced to one parking space per 400 sq. ft. of total floor area, or by at least one space, where there is a mix of residential and non-residential in the same structure. HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 4 Parking Analysis A single loaded parking bay is proposed on the south side of the property with access taken off of NE 1st Avenue. The proposed use is office with a total of 3,219 sq. ft., which requires a total of 10.73 or 11 parking spaces. Six (6) of the 11 spaces are provided on-site including one (1) handicapped space and two (2) compact spaces. Five (5) in-lieu spaces are being requested with seven (7) proposed on-street parking spaces with landscape nodes to be constructed: two (2) spaces along NE 1st Avenue and five (5) spaces on NE 2nd Street. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(5), if it is impossible to provide required parking on-site or off-site, pursuant to Section 4.6.9(E)(4), the in-lieu fee option provided in Section 4.6.9(E) may be collected. For the purpose of this provision, "inappropriateness" may be considered in relationship to the historic character of this [OSSHAD] zone district. LDR Section 4.6.9(E)(3)(e), states that in addition to in-lieu fees due, where adequate right-of- way exists adjacent to a proposed project the applicant must construct additional on-street parking. The applicant is seeking to purchase five (5) in-lieu parking spaces in accordance with LDR Section 4.6.9(E)(3)(b)(3). The cost in the OSSHAD is $6,000 per space for a total of $30,000 with respect to this proposal. If approved by the City Commission, the in-lieu fee will need to be remitted prior to issuance of a building permit or an agreement entered into per LDR Section 4.6.9(E). The applicant proposes to construct seven (7) on-street parking spaces (two along NE 1st Avenue and five along NE 2nd Street) and will seek reimbursement of a portion of the in-lieu parking fee. The Parking Management Advisory Board (PMAB) reviewed the in-lieu request during its meeting of February 24, 2004. During the review, the PMAB recommended denial of the five (5) in-lieu space request. The Board further recommended that the square footage of the building be reduced in order to meet more of the required parking on-site as was previously approved with the Management Systems site plan (2,400 sq. ft. building) which included a request for two (2) in-lieu spaces and the construction of two (2) on-street parking spaces on NE 1st Avenue. Therefore, the project should incorporate a reduction in the square footage of the proposed building thus reducing the required number of in-lieu spaces requested. The Historic Preservation Board provided direction during its meeting of March 3, 2004, where they directed the applicant to request in-lieu spaces proportional to the previous certified Site Plan for the Management Systems project. The previous Site Plan for the 2,400 sq. ft. Management Systems Building was modified from its original proposal of five (5) on-site spaces and three (3) in-lieu requests based on concerns that the ratio of parking spaces provided to in-lieu requested was too the excessive for the site and the use. Based on these concerns, the site plan was modified to provide six (6) on-site and two (2) in-lieu spaces. As the percentage of the two (2) previously approved in-lieu request of two (2) spaces constitutes 25% of the required parking, the same percentage must be applied to the current proposal. Based on the current proposal, which requires 11 spaces, the applicant must provide a total of eight (8) spaces on-site and may request no more than three (3) in-lieu spaces in order to meet the ratio previously established with the certification of the Management Systems proposal. As the applicant has not modified the HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 5 previous proposal of providing six (6) spaces on-site and five (5) in-lieu spaces requested, the proposal, as presented, does not meet the direction proposed by the Board and must be modified in order to meet the 25% in-lieu requirement. Otherwise, the current proposal should be denied. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Stacking Distance Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c), provisions must be made for stacking and transition of incoming traffic from a public street, such that traffic may not backup into the public street system. The minimum distance required between NE 1st Avenue and the first parking space within a parking lot containing 20 parking spaces or less is five feet (5'). Off-Street Parking Regulations: The design of the parking area does not provide for the required 5' stacking distance pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1). The applicant has requested that a waiver to this requirement be granted to reduce the stacking distance along NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet six inches (2'-6"). The following is an analysis of that request: Waiver Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. • While the proposed on-site stacking distance is insufficient, there will be 14' 3/" from the first parking space to the NE 1st Avenue travel lanes due to the provision of on-street parking between the travel lanes and the property. The provision of five feet (5') of stacking on local streets is primarily to take into account the five foot (5') wide perimeter landscape strip. Further, the office development will generate relatively low traffic volumes and similar waivers have been granted for parking areas adjacent to alleyways. Granting the waiver will neither negatively affect the neighboring area nor diminish the provision of public facilities or create an unsafe situation. Further, given the conditions under which this waiver is being requested it is reasonable to believe that the waiver would be granted elsewhere under similar circumstances. Therefore, a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), can be made. Bike Rack Pursuant to LDR 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided at any non- residential use within the City's TCEA (Transportation Concurrency Exception Area) which, HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 6 through the development review process, is determined to generate a demand. The TCEA includes the Old School Square Historic District. In addition, Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan requires bicycle facilities on all new development and redevelopment with particular emphasis on development within the TCEA. Provision of a bike rack is appropriate for this development and has been provided. Site Lighting Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting is required on site for new development proposals. A photometric plan has been submitted to meet this requirement as outlined in LDR Section 4.6.8. Further, site lighting locations are reflected on the site, landscape, and engineering plans and decorative fixture details were provided for the site and building lighting. Underground Utilities Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.8, utility facilities serving the development shall be located underground throughout the development. All utility lines are to be buried underground and should be noted as such on the site plan. This has been listed in the technical comments. Sidewalks Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5'wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-way adjacent to the property. An existing 5' sidewalk is currently located along NE 2nd Street and a new 5' concrete sidewalk is proposed along NE 1st Avenue. If the site plan is approved and the in-lieu fee request granted, the sidewalk along NE 2nd Street will need to be reconstructed. Further, the proposed easternmost landscape node terminating the on- street parking along NE 2nd Street, prohibits access to the sidewalk north of NE 2nd Street along NE 1st Avenue. The landscape node should be re-designed in order to provide full access to the existing sidewalk to the north of NE 2nd Street on NE 1st Avenue. These have been added as technical items. It is noted that future consideration may be given to reconfigure the landscape nodes at the corner of NE 2nd Street and NE 1st Avenue to provide a diagonal curb cut. This can be administered by the City's Engineering Department, if required. Refuse Container Area The proposed refuse area is located along the west elevation of the building. All refuse containers must be screened by decorative wood fences and gates or landscaping. The refuse containers will be screened by a ficus hedge. The hedging should surround the refuse containers to the north and south in order to screen the containers from view on NE 2nd Street and the parking area. Further, the refuse area must accommodate recyclable materials. A technical item has been added that the refuse area be screened on both the north and south sides and that the area is designed to accommodate recyclables. HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 7 Right-of-Way Dedication Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), and the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the required rights-of-way widths for NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Street are 60. Fifty feet of right-of-way already exists on NE 2"d Street. Prior to approval of the previous Class V Site Plan, only 40' of right-of-way existed on NE 1st Avenue. The Development Services Management Group (DSMG) approved a right-of-way reduction for NE 1st Avenue and NE 2" Street to 50' with the previously approved site plan for Management Systems. Accordingly, only five feet (5') of additional right-of-way was dedicated for NE 1st Avenue. Therefore, no additional right-of-way for NE 1st Avenue is required with this proposal. The 50' right-of-way for NE 2"d Street is adequate. Accessibility Requirements Pursuant to Section 4.6.2 of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, accessible parking spaces serving a particular building shall be located on the shortest safely accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible entrance. In order to meet this requirement, the proposed lobby and elevator should be relocated from the northeast to the southwest corner of the building. Further, according to Florida Statute 316.1955(a), Parking Spaces for Persons Who Have Disabilities, all[parking] spaces must be located on an accessible route no less than 44 inches wide so that the user will not be compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. As proposed, the parking area does not meet the intent of this statute. Therefore, the parking should be flipped to provide the most direct accessible route to the building by permitting a pedestrian to maneuver to the entrance of the building (which should be located to the west side of the building) without jeopardizing personal safety by walking through the drive aisle. If the parking is not re- configured to flip the parking, the applicant will be required to obtain approval of a waiver from the Accessibility Advisory Council, Department of Community Affairs, to retain the present configuration. It is noted that the accessible space cannot be relocated to the east of the parking area as the required five foot (5') maneuvering area cannot be provided and an on-site space would be lost. If the site plan is approved, flipping the parking and relocating the lobby and elevator have been attached as conditions of approval. Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) Scale of Engineering Plan are to be 1"=20' or 1"=30' only. 2) A SFWMD permit is required for this project. Provide copies of permit. 3) Clearly indicate the dimension of the existing site grades and proposed site grades. 4) Provide a typical cross section from building to adjacent right-of-way or adjacent property at north and east property lines. Pay particular attention to grade differential from proposed site to existing adjacent properties and show the existing grades on adjacent property. HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 8 5) Site is required to retain 5 year 1 hour storm (3.2") in addition to meeting water quality criteria. Provide signed and sealed drainage calculations and indicate how storm water will be retained on site. 6) Provide certified exfiltration trench test results. 7) Show nearest existing drainage structures and provide rim and invert elevation. 8) Section Y-Y indicates 2.5' between property line and parking 5' is required. 9) On sections X-X and Y-Y the 5' area between parking lot and property line should be swaled not bermed. 10)Indicate on the plans the 45 degree taper of the on-street end spaces and provide only "F" type curbing in right-of-way. 11)Show nearest existing fire hydrants and add any necessary hydrants per fire department requirements. 12)Indicate rim and invert of upstream and down stream manholes of proposed sewer laterals. 13)Applicant is to field verify location, size and depth of existing City of Delray Beach utilities. 14)Indicate location of irrigation water meters. Show how meter is connected for service. 15)Provide a recorded Declaration of Unity of Title. 16)Provide two copies of a Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to and during construction of all sites, the permitee shall implement and maintain all erosion and sediment control measures included in the required Pollution Prevention Plan. For projects over one (1) acre in size, provide a copy of FDEP Notice of Intent. 17)Trees within the site visibility triangle must be 6' clear trunk and hedges and ground covers maintained at 3' in height maximum. No landscaping over 36" in height at the intersection of NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Street. 18)That the refuse area is enclosed by landscaping to the north and south and that the area is designed to accommodate recyclables. 19)That the proposed sidewalk along NE 1st Avenue should be continued to connect with the existing sidewalk north of NE 2nd Street and that construction of on-street parking may facilitate reconstruction of the existing sidewalks. 20)That all utility lines are buried underground. 21)That the notation for the sign is eliminated. HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration • Page 9 22)That the mean height of the roof is noted on the elevations and measured to scale (refer to page A-3.1 cross section) . 23)That a revised traffic statement is submitted which reflects the proposed square footage. LANDSCAPE _ AN ALYSI. The proposed landscape plan includes Reullia adjacent to the building with Trinette and Green Island Ficus flanking the surrounding walkway, perpendicular to NE 2nd Street and NE 1st Avenue. Wax Jasmine, Pink Tabebuia and assorted Annuals are provided within the landscape nodes on NE 1st Avenue. If approved the landscape plan must be modified to show all improvements and landscaping within the NE 2nd Street right-of-way. Cocoplum hedging is proposed along the perimeter of the property including a portion of the refuse container and the a/c units with Wart Fern adjacent to the parking area. Foundation landscaping shall be provided for building elevations that are visible from the right-of-way. These have been added as landscape technical items. The proposed landscaping complies with the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16 with the exceptions noted below in the waiver analysis and the landscape technical items. Waiver Analysis: Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation;and, d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. The waivers are requested to maximize the number of on-site parking spaces through the installation of six (6) on-site parking spaces. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscape strip of not less than 5' in width, excluding curbing, shall be located between the vehicular use area and abutting properties and that one tree shall be provided and the landscape barrier shall be a minimum of 24" in height at the time of planting along the perimeter landscape barrier that separates the vehicular use area from abutting properties. The proposed landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent right-of-way to the east side of the property is only one and half feet (1'6") in width excluding curbing. The width of the landscape island is capable of supporting the hedge that is required to screen the vehicular use area from the right-of- way, however the provision of the required tree within the landscape island is not feasible, as the tree would only have two feet (2') of soil in which to take root. Further, the provision of a tree within the landscape island would interfere with the Pink Tabebuia that is to be installed within the adjacent landscape node. HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 10 The proposed landscape buffer adjacent to the vehicular use area on the west side of the property varies between two feet (2') and three feet (3') in width. The buffer, while deficient in size, will still contain the landscape materials necessary to screen the parking area from the adjacent property. In addition, a six foot (6') high wood fence currently exists on the adjacent property to the west. Granting these waivers will not have an adverse affect on the neighboring area, diminish the provision of public facilities, or create an unsafe situation. Further, given the conditions under which the waivers are being requested it is reasonable to believe that the waiver would be granted elsewhere under similar circumstances. Consequently, a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), can be made. Landscape Plan Technical Items: While revised plans have accommodated most of the staff concerns the following items remain outstanding, and must be addressed prior to building permit submittal: 1) All existing and proposed trees on neighboring properties should be identified to avoid conflicts. 2) If the existing ficus hedge along the west perimeter of the property is in good condition, ground cover can be provided in lieu of the proposed cocoplum hedging. 3) Foundation landscaping shall be provided for building elevations that are visible from the right-of-way. DESIGN ELEMENTS/ANALYSIS. _ Design Elements The applicant proposes a 3,219 sq. ft. three-story, block building for office use. The project displays a front facing gable with a mill finish, standing seam metal roof, shed dormer and flat roof with window's walk style railing accommodating the elevator shaft. The building features a hardiplank, lap siding exterior, decorative knee braces on the gable roof, balcony, and dormers, and divided light, impact resistant fenestration. A balcony on the second floor of the north and south elevations mimics the outline of the shed roof dormer above. Both the balcony and the elevator shaft display picket railings. Fenestration includes divided light, white, aluminum frame casement windows and French doors (with impact resistant glass). Fenestration is symmetrical throughout the building with primary doors on the first floor of the east and west elevations and secondary, single French doors with fixed transoms on the first and second floors of the north and south elevations. The primary doors consist of a single, divided light entry door with sidelights on the east elevation and a single, divided light entry door on the west elevation. Both display a gable door hood with decorative knee braces. Hanging colonial style lanterns are proposed along the first floor of the north and south elevations and at the entry doors on the first floor. HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 11 A three foot (3') high picket fence is proposed along the north and east property lines. An existing six foot (6') fence is located along the south property line as well as the west. A monochromatic color scheme is proposed for the building with white trim, accents, and body. Development Standards LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non- contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. Analysis Although the proposed style of the building compliments the architecture of the surrounding properties and differentiates itself from the historic buildings with the use of modern materials, the building height is not appropriate for the site due to the increased square footage and the subsequent increase in the required number of parking spaces as well as the scale of the building in relation to the surrounding district. Further, the height, as proposed, exceeds the 35' maximum height requirement for the OSSHAD zoning district. As the height has not been modified from the original proposal, it is recommended that the proposal be denied until such time as the building is reduced in height to meet the 35' maximum height requirement. In addition, although the massing of the roof line is broken up by the proposed shed dormers, the extension of the elevator shaft above the gable roof appears obtrusive and incompatible with the gable roof. It is therefore recommended that the elevator shaft be re- HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 12 • designed to incorporate the shaft and necessary equipment into the proposed roof line. Alternately, a different elevator such as a L.U.L.A. (limited use, limited application) elevator could be utilized. The elevator could also be relocated to the southwest corner of the building which would address the handicapped accessibility concerns and be concealed with the construction of a new or alternate roofline or an architectural element befitting the style of the building, such as a faux chimney. Further, while white is historically appropriate, use of solid white is not typical of that found throughout the district. It is therefore recommended that at least one color be introduced as the body, trim, or accent of the building. Positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)4), (E)(7), and (E)(8) (a-k) can be made once the issues above have been addressed. If the site plan is approved, the items identified above should be listed as conditions of approval. REfQUVRED I FLND1N Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Other Mixed Use (OMU) and a zoning designation of Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(B)(2), within the OSSHAD zoning district, business and professional offices are listed as permitted uses. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A), Future Land Use Map Consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to. water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 13 As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan was conducted and no applicable goals, objectives or policies were found. Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bounded by the OSSHAD zoning district with a combination of commercial, office, and residential uses. Compatibility is not a concern, as the proposed office use of the subject property would be permitted on the surrounding properties. The proposal retains the existing residential character and building style of the district, however, the scale and massing are inappropriate for the area. Based on the above, the development will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent properties once the square footage and the height of the building are reduced. REVIEW BY OTHERS. . . .... :.... Community Redevelopment Agency The project proposed for Ascot was reviewed by the CRA during its meeting on February 12, 2004. The CRA Board recommended approval as proposed. Pineapple Grove Design Committee The Ascot project was reviewed by the Pineapple Grove Design Committee during its meeting on February 9, 2004. The project was accepted as proposed. `. . ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION " _._ .. ..t _. .. The development proposal involves the construction of a new three-story, 3,219 sq. ft. office and the integration of perimeter landscaping and parking. The request for the in-lieu is not supported based on the increased square footage and that the property is vacant. Therefore, the parking can be accommodated on-site and with a minimum of required in- lieu spaces when the appropriate square footage is proposed. The height of the building must be reduced by 1'6" to comply with LDR Section 4.3.4(J). Further, revisions must be made to comply with the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. The applicant should therefore consider proceeding with the originally approved site plan. The proposal will be consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 14 Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan with changes as identified in this staff report. These changes are outlined above. • ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. By Separate Motions: Waivers 1) Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), to reduce the required stacking distance along NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet-six inches (2'- 6"), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5); 2) Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent western property line from five feet (5') to two feet (2'), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5); and, 3) Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent east property line from five feet (5') to one and a half feet (1'6"), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Site Plan Approve the COA for the Class V site plan for the office at 8 NE 2"d Street, Ascot, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), Section 2.4.6(J) (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report; 2) That the lobby and elevator are relocated to the southwest corner of the building and that the parking be flipped to provide the most direct, accessible route to the building; and, 3) That the square footage and height of the building is reduced to the previously approved 2,400 sq. ft., two-story design. Landscape Plan Approve the COA for the landscape plan for 8 NE 2"d Street, Ascot, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following condition: HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 15 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the landscape technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. Design Elements Approve the COA for the original of the Class V site plan for the office at 8 NE 2"d Street, Ascot, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8), subject to the following conditions: 1) That an additional color is added to the building's trim, accent or body colors scheme; and, 2) That the elevator shaft be relocated and/or re-designed to compliment the pitch of the gable roof and dormers. C. By Separate Motions: Waivers 1) Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), to reduce the required stacking distance along NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet-six inches (2'-6"), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5); 2) Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent western property line from five feet (5') to two feet (2'), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5); and, 3) Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent east property line from five feet (5') to one and a half feet (1'6"), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Site Plan Approve the COA for the Class V site plan for the office at 8 NE 2"d Street, Ascot, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), Section 2.4.6(J) (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report; HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration • Page 16 2) That the lobby and elevator are relocated to the southwest corner of the building and that the parking be flipped to provide the most direct, accessible route to the building; 3) That the building meets the 35' height requirement; and, 4) That the in-lieu request is approved by the City Commission. Landscape Plan Approve the COA for the landscape plan for 8 NE 2nd Street, Ascot, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following condition: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the landscape technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. Design Elements Approve the COA for the original of the Class V site plan for the office at 8 NE 2nd Street, Ascot, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8), subject to the following conditions: 1) That an additional color is added to the building's trim, accent or body colors scheme; and, 2) That the elevator shaft be relocated and/or re-designed to compliment the pitch of the gable roof and dormers. D. Deny the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements for 8 NE 2nd Street, Ascot, based upon failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 2.4.6(J) (COA Findings), 4.3.4(J)(2)(b) (Building Height), 4.4.24(G)(4)(a) and (G)(5) (OSSHAD Parking Requirements and In-lieu), 4.5.1.(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k) (Design Elements), 4.6.9(E)(3)(e) (Parking Requirements and In- lieu Requests), 4.6.16 (Landscaping), and'Section 4.6.2 of the Florida Accessibility Code, with basis stated. STAFF RECM.MEND.ATlON _ Deny the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements for 8 NE 2nd Street, Ascot, based upon failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 2.4.6(J) (COA Findings), 4.3.4(J)(2)(b) (Building Height), 4.4.24(G)(4)(a) and (G)(5) (OSSHAD Parking Requirements and In-lieu), 4.5.1.(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k) (Design Elements), 4.6.9(E)(3)(e) (Parking Requirements and In-lieu Requests), 4.6.16 (Landscaping), and Section 4.6.2 of the Florida Accessibility Code. Attachments: Survey, Site Plan,Landscape Plan, Elevations,Floor Plan Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration • Page 17 APPENDIX A ... . CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists via service lateral connections to the 8"water main along NE 1st Avenue. ❑ Sewer service exists via service lateral connections to a 12"sewer main along NE 2nd Street. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided via existing a fire hydrant on the corner of NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Street. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build- out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standards. Drainage: A preliminary drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on- site via an exfiltration system. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD, and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The proposed 3,219 sq. ft. office will generate approximately 36 additional daily trips (5 additional a.m. peak trips and 5 p.m. peak trip) which will not have a significant impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Schools: As the subject property is located in the City's TCEA and the applicant is not proposing any residential components, this project is exempt from School Concurrency. Parks and Recreation Facilities: Parks dedication requirements do not apply to this non-residential use. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for a construction of a three-story office building on a vacant parcel. Trash generation is based upon the worst case scenario of office use. Trash generated each year by the proposed 3,219 sq.ft. office space will be 8.7 tons of solid waste per year (3,219 x 5.4 t- 2,000 = 8.69 or 8.7). As the property is presently vacant, the proposed use results in an increase of 8.7 tons per year. The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration • Page 18 service standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2024. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. HPB Staff Report • 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration • Page 19 APPENDIX B. STANDARDS FQR -SITE .''PL:ANAtCTIANS.. A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood,the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent HPB Staff Report 8 NE 2nd Street-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Re-consideration Page 20 • F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location,without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X • Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent • -BENCH MARK: TOP `WATER ' NAIL AND WASHER VALVE I ELEVATION+18J3 _ c N.E. 2ND STREET _ - VIJ MASTORM SEWER NHOLE RIM+18.70 +19.68 +19.47 PAVED +18.73 o ` CATCH BASIN N RIM+17.91 I; . _ . _ , _ , _ 66.00'PLAT POLE `POLE / 1+19.33 +o t19.17 CONC WALK SURVEY t188 t18.19 60.00' } 3, b. L OVERHEAD UTILITY FOUND 5/8"IRON 89e p Ia LINES(TYPICAL) ROD(NO NUMBER) c• ,.y'1 p W-� m, v. ,e• ggh0 .1 pm ct 1:igi Z2 .I xp3 AREA = 6,294 SQ. FT. OR u.`"� LOT 9 0.14 ACRES, MORE OR LESS o W I BLOCK 6 7 a W ZI U ON O O 4 W Ck VACANT .M Q k- 20 0 R v~i'' .0 �., D!l e O W 1 N W ti a o L SEWER LIE EASEMENT - Z i Si PER DEED _ 1 LOT 9 W4yW I� LOT 10 T Ea.--20 i O 60.0' croy 1 h mW 1 y1 N cs. n3 I g��o �`'.+. `v ppW .n WOOD FENCE ;? ^ Woo 0 +20.1 +19.9 WOOD SO,p h 0' �! CONC DRIVE 66.11�SURVEY 1 YW a!I. FOUND 1/2"IRON o CONC DRIVE " - Ot<p� ti y ROD WITH CAP 66.00'PLAT 2Q ' IF-2102(0.2 N.) Y e* EXISTING BUILDING ex +19.9 FLOOR+20.66 2� Zee LOT 1 0 b i,W O WeJ BLOCK 6 7 6m ai mxW h* + ]_ 20.0' 13111'SURVEY 13100'PLAT DESCRIPTION: CERTIFIED TO: LOT 9, LESS THE WEST 60 FEET AND LESS THE EAST 5 FEET THEREOF, COLONIAL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 26.5 FEET OF LOT 10, LESS THE WEST 60 FEET AND LESS THE EAST 5 FEET THEREOF, BLOCK 67, DELRAY BEACH BROAD AND CASSELL (F/K/A TOWN OF LINTON), ACCORDING TO THAT CERTAIN PLAT AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 3, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM ATTORNEYS' TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC. BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; TOGETHER WITH A PERPETUAL EASEMENT FOR SEWER LINES ACROSS THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF THE WEST 60 FEET OF GARRETT M. BENDER AND TERI J. GEVINSON, LOT 9 AND THE NORTH 26.5 FEET OF THE WEST 60 FEET OF LOT 10, AS TENANTS-IN-COMMON BLOCK 57. Silberstein SITE STATISTICS Architects AREA 524 NE 2nd Street - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - y- Dailey Beach Florida 33483 TOTAL GROUND FLOOR AREA: 1.324 SOFT 19%OF SITE + 19.41 - I L + 18.73 Tel: 561 - 276 - 9393 TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 3.219 SOFT 46%OF SITE 7PARKING/PAVED AREA: 2,740 SOFT 40%OF SITE I N.E. 2ND STREET Fax: 561 - 276 0585 OPEN/LANDSCAPED SPACE: 2,734 SUIT 40%OF SITE 1 E-mail: pebsllbgballroulp.t.I WATER BODIES: 0 SOFT OX OF SITE --\� OWNER TO IMPR IGHi OF WAY ' BUILD 2 RKING SPACES ( L I o♦n o e AR o 0 1 3 4 2• (3)IN UEU PARKING J. SETBACK PARKING BYAOWNER. BE BUILTel. r WITH 5`- R.O.W. .. • TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 11 \ /rThi 4 TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 6G PROPOS D 3'-0'HIGH X TOTAL INUEU PARKING SPACES 5 1 =is- TO I BE BUILT AS PARALLEL SPACES / 22'-0' 22'-0' li-- 22'-0" L 4'-0" IDE SIGN LOCATI N Architect hereby expressly reserves J. 22'-0' 22.- Y P Y ON RIGHT OF WAY ON NE 2ND ST —y \ / , his common law copyright antl o AND NE 1ST AVE. - Q I 'col other property rights In Iheae plane. I 3'-0' HIGH 1 Thla design and droving an not to PILAU I LNI.0 SETBACKS REQUIRED i be reproduced, changed or copied REQUIRED ACTUAL . u EXISITNG CONCRETE SIDEWALK of - I the e SLOPE In xpress written form tpelrmissrst ionl and Q \I:3:N... + 19.17 I, I = 66 0 ...In - tB.19 ,o I consent of 'silbnretetn Architects" NORTH 25'-0" nor an they to be In on SOUTH 10'-0' S0'S 5/16"' r } _ I p Y Y pin VI duplicated without first obtaining EAST 15'-0" 15'-0"WITH 5'-0" R.O.W. o l l - _ i said written permission and WEST 7'-6" 7'- +20 4. •1 I , g2 O WIDEc. consent. 6" -a` I _2 ,'. :1CKE7 FENCE DOOR -.; 19 4 _ + 3 o II ASCOT BUII DING HEIGHTS I �- "" % N i�. - W O 1 REQUIRED LESS THAN 35'-0" i ! (2)IN UEU PARKING 8 N.E.2ND STREET - I SPACES TO B'BUILT DELRAY BEACH,FL 33444 BY OWNER. _ - 48'-0 16 - t _ ` SETBACK z J �I TOTAL NUMBER OF FI Of7R5 ` -- 2 1/2 ACTUAL 34'-1 I EXISTING 1 CAR .�: ,/ BRICK PAVERS.. .� ,_ / / a I Q I GARAGE f r` , _ \ 1 70NING DISTRICTS `f'o • ,:!y,�, L.g7.�•• ,e y yTK i •' ., 3'-Q'H GH + 7 .38 OSSHAD I I p -'T :r`.2 y.`L,ZL •., Ri. r, Vir4$4.M.M'I. �'�'S�w:t. AY�y` i :. 'ICKET ENC I —1© �.I s 'o i c :'I FSAI DFtCRIPTION ' $'-0 i I 9 LESS THE WEST 60 FEET THEREOF AND THE NORTH T O - / OP- LOT 26.5 FEET OF LOT 10, LESS THE WEST 60 FEET THEREOF. a3 BLOCK 67,TOWN OF UNTON(NOW DELRAY BEACH).ACCORDING / \� Yt, TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN.QLAT BOOK 1, PAGE I "T _ - K • 3(SHEET 2),PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,FLORIDA. I r O r-- 11 0 , Nibs.. Q1 Ind ' 3STANDARD RINI DING COOFS --� ," — ram, �y1=po- ; �.n..3y$ ' •1IpopOCCUPANCYrO � . y ;. __! T FINtLR.SUB r^v i ..=_I i �`•4,5 iti, � �`S GROUP B BUSINESS OCCUP Y I - F 7 `lt-'I j '� "r �5' 0" R.O.W. W �..": - I I - Drs ICATION TYPE CO RU I .. Q i rt 112 gi/76^••• �, I i ? ._- 1 I _ ---7 I x J `` v jILOW PREVENTER Ln �I7--- 1st, .... c I PROVSYSTESt. _ a wELVAORSSHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FGHT •i -y h,, I P'., V /REQUIREMENT OF ASME/ANSI-A 17.1/6 I — T + q 5:- - Vi rMir 11 W.a1£8. kv 15'-0" C] r I,_.'go 451-0" _-__J I I +i'.2- I - LIGHT P LE. M1 NEIGHBOURING TWO STOREYED - T -SLTBAC 48.-0 7 16' CURB CUT I t0'-5 1/16' TYPICAL DOOR / \'AT PATHWAY SET.ACK ! - PROJECT LOCATION - - - BUI DING UNDER CONSTRUCTION r 1 , / I TRASH CAN \BIC-YOL CA71CK' I • IC I I %� I • r )• DUBBING" c _ __. 1 -_ 6.0 W. F� MINN i t+ip .aI I .�fc-�-,� ; / I —1 , 4. 18'-3 7/18" j a° N ;I , I i g( • '-ice ; 9 I _,_ ! ! ` $;/)E Z-F.„ �� I I F ,_____ i ... r _ .:.„ • ' ✓A�I l I i I I 1 - I I DE:OIS pRATNEH . . : _, I ' \\�` MI MI, ✓.' - / I I 1 1 �`�) LIGHT POLE i r.1 f i G/, r i----r I. -i/ 6 L )1 i �/ .1 ��r./* I1. 26'-6 1/16' 7 6 i +20.00 19C '- I I I d 1 i I r - / + 18.Q7 �p FICUS HEDGE TO BE PLANNED BY VICINITY M{sr I co I NEW DEVELOPMENT UNDER CONSTRUCTION 3--6J-5 0 12 0 1 sitQ 4 O a 0 B 6 W � e . I 7_ ! �' / 6 PICKET H NCE ,FIRC HYDRANT LOCATION _ ' P.L. = 66'-0" - - Q EXISTING 6'-0' m I I� N[2ne STREET II HIGH WOOD FENCE I 1 • PROJECT:LOCATION / I ` EXISTING ONE STORY RESIDENCE if. SHEET A-6.0 I `� - I REVISIONS �I zIl NE 111 STREET II 02/09/04 LOCATION MAP N.T.S. `AC COMMENTS LOCATION MAP © SITE PLAN 3 STORY SCHEME JANUARY09,2004 coA-1a1 NO SCALE SCALE:1/8"=1'-0" �vl VVV I Drawn by:BP -- G:Vuchitecture1ProjectslOfficeslAscotldwgs\Cds1A-1.1.dwg P.L. = 66'-0" _ �— __ __ P.L. = 66'-0" P.L._-66'-0 - -- �- -- i IQI Jeffrey Silberstein -- -- - ——T 1 I Architect&Assoclates,lnc 1 I I I I i I I I I I 524 NE 2nd Street i I. Delray Beech.Florida 33483 I �nil dal c m� Tel: 681 - 278 • 9393 I I ^al b I ^W I Fax: 661 - 278 - 0586 to I,I I - w I E-meil:Ie:IturUleebNlroule.oet 10'-0" H '0.-0" 17'-11 3/4' I PROPOSED L 1 o e n.. AROOt 3{54 18'-0 3/16" PROPOSED 7'SET 3/4• • I PROPOSED SETBACK I. y SETBACK I .... I SETBACK I ® ae'-0"n SETBACK SETBACK L-y SETBACK r( 1 —AIR HANDLER UNIT © y 1 u / ABOVE CEILING ® I i I 1 ! I I i h-lLLI i j--1-i--ru4-��!-{-I--I '1 ! j I l�i/� I ' I Q 1 I I 11 I I I I ; I 1 I I I I�i I I I "Ili !v Architect hereby expressly reserve 1 I `El ` 7 1 ( i I 'N. " ` I his common law copyright on. �R \\\�` I I I® I V , U\� I I 1 ! I l ! \ / I Thiothes design and ghts In draring hese en not nl 1 ® fl i L I /b y® � I r I Y I ( .\ ' I- � I »,r,1 V I -.wl •I ''^ ittI ® i I I I , ®' I nor ors they to b.In.any par \ark i I I I . , u•_�- I duplicated without first obtainlni �X',� j�zr'-o' I _ I 1 I - 4 I a l I i-� • rw.ruLsue I sold written P h� 1 I • Y t I ( t '_ Y I 1 I I Permla- consent O —- ( :l rw.rucsue I ih b�`?: i I., _ rwJwsus - I ————— ——-�-+-' © i 'I .. I! I 1 ,`—' ,"y I II 1 I !� t- ( ��h--__ I I I I 32'I O' �. i I I --_ -� I ASCOT a I { I _ P. y i +. I o f I i j ' l ' ' 8 N.E.2ND S?REE' ri o + i t ! i • 1 I , ,_ �_`" I I '; ' ; II ; I i ; l "j ; 7 ! I" ; i'I ' ,t I I�� I I I I DELRAY BEACH,FL 3344 J ELECTRICAL BOOM i C ! I i I I j I—I-I-�-I-I-i-I-I-I—IJt}i j j j I L i I r II I �i_i—I—I_——i_——' 7-6" 10'-s i11/16" 7•-6� J j J 7'_6. 10'-5 11/16" ` - SETBACK 46'-0 7/16" I 0 SETBACK / / SETBACK SETBACK a8'_0• 110•SET�ACK16• CL / / ® 48'-0" / SETBACK / j (so10 i 3.1 1 I 1 i 1 .1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 . I • 1 1 I 29�I • _ 1 I I1 • 1 0� ! I li i! 1 1 ,;.,i,i m Ni I i I I I1- I I I I I I I I •l i 1 i . ______________ . _a____i _ _ ,. i P.L. = 66'-O" P.L. = 66'-0" 0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN0 SECOND FLOOR PLAN T r P,t. _ ¢6- /q THIRp FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1/8"=1'-0" SCALE:1/8'=1'-0" ' SCALE:.1/6'I=1'-0" • • I - ! T-11 3/4" AIL 10'-0" $ET811CK el wo: I PROPOSEp / 'SETBACK -� I. Illlli !•i111, 1 iI ill ! I •il 1.111 I II .1}� h 1. Hi * 1-1 ;.j;_lei+-j ;- i ! .i i i l;it l 10 111 i l ; l I ; I I f l ; I i ! 1 �T. r i 1 lel! I i .l , I1 . . ; ill ' '; ! IiII il ' I ` III li ! ' I i ' I i .j l i i i l i i I I I I ' i t 17-1,i I i~ ; �I a I L • • • •Ii HI ii it it j.l ;-.ii lilt ! • i ji iIi i I i il ! ! jilt I I ! . ti I•I IIII ! ! li i ! H .iI Iilil i I lli it • • ... '+ 1 _ I 4. I - ++ I+ Illi + lli 1 1 T + T 7- T T ` 1 �' �c- i j Ilii I Ii ilfi i1 ', 1 1 I ': ,._6.1_ i l i I i j ! ! I I ! I I ' ! I ! I I i l0'-5,11/16• REVISIONS _ /SETBACK/ 48-0 SETBACK Qz 02/09/04 TAC COMMENTS 1 I JANUARY 09,2004 I• ROOF PLAN i I A-20 4 SCALE:1/8"=1'0" Drawn by:BP G:1Architeclure\ProjectslO f!cesWscotklwgslcds1A-2.0.dwg {i Jeffrey Silberstein WHITE WOOD PICKET RAILING o f , ip f ! 1 i t i I f I j i i L i $ ' € : i 1 t i TYPICAL-WHITE I III -I h 1 i C t 1' 1 € ` I t ; IIII I,I i Q € I. 6 , e ± 6 € ¢ ` k 1 { ; pI1 II Architect&Associates,Inc. !1 !il I'i1111i1a!'ll l III ip {E" @ I 1 I 3 I ( e +sill' l 1 t`[ gF 524 NE 2ntl Street t !II I!!,I!II.L.!!I I'III t E r [ i { I I I 1 I 11 rf Dsltay Beach Florida 99419 METAL ROOF I I I 'rt ` / it I . ; I i II s .I 1 7 f TYPICAL-SILVER I I _ 1 y 1 I 1 - t t t I' I 3 e1 ( t I i F i I I ■ Tel: 561 - 27B - 93 B3 - 1 s 5 pp ip t rl i; I t ; t I '! 1 I d S i Fax: 561 - 276 - 0585 I h i I P I I € t f ! 1 I g € E-nail:!sllhusb!oObdhouIR ist [i E 1 i L{c e n a• A R 0 0 1 3 4 2 4 WHITE ALUMINUM FRAME - �� I I € t 11 I 1 I ` I 7 it I I I ( r" !I `� " I HURRICANE IMPACT RESISTANT py --- _--- T i 'I I I ! €I 9 g I i I Yt 1 1 9 I i ' _ WINDOWS AND DOORS. b __ �- I i IS I I; ! t-.H '•!II I i I-__ I 1 ; tt - TYPICAL-CLEAR GLASS [ 1 !] § I 1 i!• i t I I I•" 1 I 'I i < € 1 Li 4 III''_ II i�Ir— �I !I r C`I11 ,• 1 'H' !l� l'II I II1 I II 1IIgfIts1 !I II II I P II,' _ 1j B s I i k copyright I hla common low co rl ht c [ - - I SS} other property rights In these pia •-.--' t k : pp tt 1 j 1 I I This design and drawing are not uETAL ROOF r I 1 ki f 1 t E II I i Y I I g E {{` �' 1 i i I I NOTE be reproduced,changed or cop I J ` y I S I I p I In any form without fire obtain TYPICAL- SILVER- I + 3 I ! Ii IL IIIF i ri y I I I i I , t • the express written permission c WITH EXPOSED WHITE RAFTERS i ! t ! 1 I I 7 L _ conor ar tfbeybfo bent any ep E[ t 11 j [ S r a, I F FOR HEIGHT DIMENSIONS sold written :bats ntYon r II du Ilcabd I1hoW Aral obtain € s i HI t f 1 I SEE A-3.1 p p E I I } € 1 I 1 r 1 cones J - — - .- I I 1 1 y I I I ti. ' I—�r :�ft `" 'r-- '� {' r i;'.-- - _ WHRE WOOD PICKET RAILING 1 p E ^ TYPICAL-WHITE r= ~-!IIII Ilt- —. 7--, ' ::,:,,,,,, _-__ .: i 1 . aI I — € �WOOD COLUMNS i �`-'I I I - ��II{ 'IF• ,-_..i I , �"� _ ACWHITE _ eIT A ! f llf ,I 1 , k II I� t V�Ohilt!i iII Il'i!Iil!II IIIIIII!IIL '!!III': Ili'r II I'I !III I I111 I I I I II' I II 'II''!I 1 ,ILI id:. II II.'.I I ill I I iI I! I !'1 I i-- I'I I ili lit 1111 I II''IIVII!Ii illill 'Ir ,i ii'!�; ilI'I Iih I I II III I'II Ili' !I 1 I II:il!'i III ;lllll,I it 11!i l!I II a ll8 N.E.2ND STREI .IIII'ill III!!!IIII!II!II I 1 I:1,,,,! IIII IIII,I III I:IIII i II iIIIIII I II Ii;I iI'III IIIIIII'll I II II I II HARDI PLANK LAP SIDING _ _ II lit)!i! it II I Ill ;I III LI!„i!.II ILI I,�.,II;I 11,Illl III,I,Iliill II III o!IIL I':iI�L°,!, i1 I I IIII'I,ULI��I DELRAY BEACH,FL 334 BY BENJAMIN MOORE• I - _ _ _ ELECTRICAL FIXTURE BY HINKLEY I - 1412, BLACK FINISH ----- -"- �- II I -; I NMI n- ---� MI -- WHITE ALUMINUM FRAME \� _---..---- ��I L ----1 I ._--__. ! 1 I HURRICANE IMPACT RESISTANT f --- —1 II III L-_-__� I I' 1 �1 I I 1' -, 111 r WINDOWS AND DOORS. 'pll II _ 1ja .I I II , 1TYPICAL- CLEAR'GLASS '----- Ji -j I ICI I I pt -I 3I . WHRE WOOD I ' IfI1__.__'1 II' 1 •111 1 9 �I I -_-- II ----11IPICKET FENCE I 1 i �—l'I rrr1 11 I I I I II _ ______________I �I 1 I I IL I I I ,—II L a I .':: q.1. - 7r I• III IIII II F^, �'bf{HN I R ; I �. 1.i.. ...1 : :jt I IIII •1IIIII IIilll1 IIIIII 111111II II11111IIIIli ll11111 IIIIIIIII I • . ()NORTH ELEVATION • PICKET SCALE:1/4":11-Q" WHITE WOOD 1. I ylljl!III IIIIII!i1!!iI!I lii!Illl' TYPI LFEN WHITE ' .I 'liilll!i ii liid hi!i II'!I1, —J�- METAL ROOF TYPICAL- SILVER 11 • -__..--• hid _,.__It.__. MN -_ I ------ €`-1 _h11 IrrJ�tl l F--- -- ----- I --111 IL4y � ._ WHITE ALUMINUM-MIMPACT ESI -,i ' HURRICANE IMPACT RESISTANT - � II II ! r _ WINDOWS AND ODORS. • r--- I 1'-ei l t-.__.'_----_-- TYPICAL- CLEAR GLASS` — �I l .I I1 I i r- __ ------ III li III t !! tl I r—_._._______:.__ • • WHITE TRIM G\� !i----_--------------_------- - -'---- -- METAL ROOF r-"-"--- ----------- -- TYPICAL- SILVER ~----------------' _ _ WITH EXPOSED WHITE RAFTERS I ,..__. • I_1I ______ .. i' WOOD COLUMNS I i.-_ _--. Y�I! ___..___ -_. f _ TYPICAL- WHITE _-' _ I -- I WHITE ALUMINUM FRAME I IIIII'!1.IIII -- - it - - '1 lu II' I - HURRICANE IMPACT RESISTANT I IIplii;II I I -. INDOWS AND QOORS. '', - — ° L. 1 I'i TYPICAL--CLEAR GLASS .11!I:I II ---- ------ ! � WHITE.WOOD I --- _._---- I'icla',lit, .PICKET.RAILING 1 _--___ _ ___.__ L -- _,.._--_____ - TTP.ICAI, WHIT I � ..-_-.- -_- t _ WOQDEN BLACK. WHITE -_______—_ .-. ____..__- `. ELECTRICAL FUTURE RY F!IHKLEY - 1;‘. --- -_--___- I 1412,-BLACK FINISH • L i�r- - i —_. dill III 1;1� I.�I! _ --" ._-_---- III—dI11 Y III I' -- - -- W RDI PLANK LAP SIDING REVISIONS ITE -- • III 1 I' II • ---- - -'-- - BY BENJAMIN MOORE WHITE WOOD —__- I II t ! -i I WHITE ALUMINUM FRAME PICKET FENCE !i t II I HURRICANE IMPACT RESISTANT __ r __ ___ __ WINDOWS-AND DOORS. �,�,_11, fL ___ __.�_ ��„ r1 Q. A _ _-- -I I�S11@ ' II III TYPICAL- CLEAg GLASS `o I ...,:F^...i.. {:�"., r...,. _ { t .,,..... n .,.. n ..V. {'f1 {�r'_j r!_ 1 li JANUARY 09,200 �.: k..... A-3.0 ()EAST ELEVATION` • Drawn by:BP SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" G:1Architecture\Projeclsloffices\Ascot\dwgs\Cds\A-2.0.dwt 3 !! r • ( t r t ' ! ' 1 a E s I b6,-2t ----- - ---.. " e II E 3 i 2 S i @ 3 I i t I i E r i i E k , ' Y TOP OF ROOF \ - - i 1 k I i ; G t i ( I i T i I t i J i L•I I I , Jeffrey Silberste S a 1 S I. E I ; 3 ( i [ I s I I I -I-I I' , u i,l i • i i I e I I EI I L;r, Archite &Associates,I i t ( ' Il l e 3 I, i i 7 i ( t I 1 ; f F t I ! t t uI o I 1 I i III I,, I,- p ? R j} ' i k E 1 aI q i I f [' 3 I Y L'I •ii I 524 NE 2nd Stre • + p i ? i I i { 3 ' { k I , ' Iti I ( B [ t I I i > J I ply 52'-9` I----- -__ I _. -� .\\ Delray Beach.Florida 53• 1. E ! '' ¢ + EC ( 1 p g ( 7 CENTER OF R00 �I --'I ; 1 1 i { k i r k I t y t i / 1� I -I ` FaxTel•: 567 - 276 - OS s iI I I 9@ € 1 8 till ; L T • 1 \ �_II 7 I E I It II i i 1 p I F i E t i l E r I 52'-4' - —:. _rci� I U r u F1 E ° Ft ,-L BEARING HT ._- i _ _ .Inc. f {Y {P ,II 5 '1 ---s �' I t ,:.,_,�}f I �' E-mtll. ellterdHo belbooN t [ II I1 ' I , F: t— rl 111.,-._ir i 5 d I i 'I = -jk III i !E I I I ' ® _ _ I I IF-Mil I`(f LIc AROOi 94 I' l l I Ji r i 'yl I t p i € I, t II { j' !LT 1[_1_11 1 r 1 Ill f I I - _ I ! I -- - ! — / - i I 11 I11 II i 'l �I I- 11 I�[,.4' IK_.�'I j I4 ��I id € I 'Imo- III I I �! LA \ I --- I E'l I i l I ` I j 1 -I •L--, I 1 -I L ' € II i J i,Li_:I II �I [� _j ; E I ,....1 �, I �;-i 1, . I • Ittk -- Ea I i i —— -- .- ,t ill ' 1 u f I •k i I ! I — IIi I I I I ------ Architect hereby oxpre9aly 1 I - e I i I I 11. E t pp : t `1 _.. i his common law co ri C [ i I I Ii 1 s i F I 9 I I - - I.- . I ' -�- PY i L 9 i' I Q ; I p ' I ( [ I µ'_d- _._. , other property rights In Chet G I n }, { r I I P - - -- h design and drowin ° f c i tY i t - �— TWA dad g p j E `$ i. t II I I } I i t r I F 1 j - FINISHED FLOOR IL---- _ -_ ------ - - In eproduced• chonged o I (E I gI F 7 1 3 I fir 9 ([t —__ p any form wifhoyt first g $ I t t I l { -------- - Permlet j I I i 11 g I ^ y { I p i I c v i 3; 1 I the express written [( I i b' I. t[t q 1 1 1 1 t I . I 1 I I _-____- - -_._ -_ -_-_ 101.00, co An nsent oraf they fabe' TI i I i i f i i II I a C i A 1 I '1 I I : ------ _-_ duplicated wifhoyt firci{f __r- -r,�y q;l -_ u . ,�'.-f.----L•=lr=- 0--_b'9� 1 .--_---.----__--.. -.-._ _ tiara written Parml • �. lii iti k —_I ��I I II --- 1 -------- -- -- _ I - -1 3._O. I III!:'I I'ij ICI 11 I I i i': !I III 71,„,,,I,I.,,:1111:1;,,,,,11:11,--11::,,Iiii it I li;I'1 N'ilii ri 7,,1,1.1111,,LII,JH1,1111,!iiiill,III,1,11,i;I I'I If ili1111;I 1 Ii i -- - i --- I I',f3t I / 1I,1,dI,1!': i; I„ilII1�1 l' I! II F-- -- - I I -- - —Ibi: t'IIL, ..� l ! ;, 1 -- -- I I L, ---- il ,. ------ ',I ASC III jiiiiiiii11 yil I I';i1:1,, „,, I'ii ,I IIIII i I '•I'i l II i I I I III 1---- i ---------- k --------11' II ll'i I 1 I I ro I I Ijl,1,11i p(IIIII Ii;Illllllllillil I,I.�I; i '1!:li:I I,I,I�IIIIIIIIIII I ,I IIIII IIIII II 111111I /3,_O. (IIIII _ -_. IL I�f - I I II• I t �i LI ,•i,i iIl I I II I � I (III: 1, I :I I Ii I 11.' •II'I! 'I' I 11 _ _ _= _ 1N 32_B. �I Il�,;;I ll;i _ 8 N E 2ND STI ------- 1-------r--_._ •�-----I --_- -------_--=t ---- - I T FINSIHED FLOOR I h ---- - - .-_- - T ----- - III I,II I h DELRAY BEACH,FL i % ----- _ I L r-�I Imo— 7 '- i---- - -- --- i \ ------------ -- - ------ --- iI v ---L1 1=-----71Iir—rii; IL....-11 , - ---- ---I —'— — I'f�ii i I ; ;ii = I I —i ILFI iF r — I — i I ' __1 I r ; -----_ I -- _— I --- '- -1 NOTE _ • -- I Iu I I-- '1 T EI i�HI III I 1----- I ---- — ---— !II t — II i, iI � - II I il, 7-- 1 T,r_D. I — ;;:_. , r= FOR EXTERIOR FINISH NOTES ' 11 i 11 I I I ILIA I I I T FINSIHED FLOOR --_--- IIL i 1. I SEE A-3.0 I _ 111 L—_ 1 • (Jy, 16'-g' \I T AVERAGE CROWN OF RDAD -------- QSOUTH --ELEVATION ®WEST ELEVATION SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" d SCALE:1/4"=1'-01 . ® BEARING HElUHT'Y 60'-2" - - METAL ROOF WITH INSULATION - / — — TYPICAL-SILVER LEGEND, gi :Ell TOP OF ROOF - -_r - - 1111 • `APeeej ep RY SEMCO SOUTHEASTERN METALS +.,a Pe a CI METAL ROOF ^,a`1��ejara� 9`=\ ' -Y '-. U 4L RQOFIIS TO BE SV-CRIMP i26 GAUGE'OFIN SH "�-•.l✓d ill �. SHALL BFF O55-G JV1LUME. .PRODUCT • ® ® 11 ` 52'-9' .4 X 6 WOOD TIMBER TRUSSES APPROVAi. - - ' �' CENTER"OF R001`\ a ROOF INSULATION-MANUFACTURER SHALL RE ICYNFNF TEL 1 888+946-732$ INSULATION SHALT.BE SPRAYS 1" FASCIA BY - - 52•-4' ;i i TO UNDERSIDE AS PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. SHALL BE 5 I • �yy R-V1LUC OF`30.OR MORE Il�C HARD(PLAN _ T'BEARING HT I- — "\" �;i Ir � \ - _. • INSULATION 5 j2"THICK ANp SFIALL GIVE. i �;'I - •CONCRETE TIE BEAM m ® _ • I IIi• I; /- I- I-:-I CONCRETE TIE BEAM SEE STRUCTyWy.QNGS. .4X6 WOODEN i I'I II `\ \ I• 3'-0" I A . / /g+ II II • '," p ❑ 5/8'PLyWOQD WITH 30 LB FEJ_T Mi.) BRACI(ET . 3'-D' i T ', -' 11 II ❑ IX3 BATTENS PAINTED WHITE O I!-0'O.C.TYR 4 44•-4. • I I-- _ s 7 FINISHED FLOOR -- ❑Q CONCRETE FLOOR SEE SfRUO7URAL GAGS • , • •\ CONCRETE TIE BEAM r (� t ❑ 10 _ ; 1 T 1 I 3, I r-- ___ :. i ❑ 7 UgDIN �BIPXD1PN0.4�l1RE 7E BY 6ENINAIN NgGRE ,---1 I. I A•-B" ii I III ,I I METEAVE QRIP BY$EMCO SOUTHEASTERN METALS _ u,_d �( rl I ,1 I I I I 4._6 . ® MANUFACTURING CO.,MC. TEL i-8°0.874r0335. �- 1y l I ; + �/ METAL SAVE DRIP-(ED-1). V-CRIMP PANEL ACCEDSORIE •RRgNEO iLO0R7 I 1 II II I; ;i I _ FINISH SfULI BE AZ-SS C LVAUUME - :- j•• p i I III I I I .POURED IN PUCE 6' METAL TRANSITION FLASHING BY SEMCO SOUTHEASTERM r I; I - CONCRETE FLOOR TYPICAL a MET LS III 1 III -!I ❑ ') MANUFACTURING CQ INC. TEL'1-@00-p73-0. 1, 1 I IIIII I II II III 11I 1 1 I;II II III I If II METAL TRANSITION FLASHING(BE 11[,SV-CRIMP PANEL ACCESSORIES. FINISHSHALL BE 55 GALVALUME- 32'-8' I• III;IIIII III f IIL- I I III IIi III III III - FX7 ` N A4- •�Jy, j I IiIi,,:L I i, I r I I IIIII„II'- fR10R WU I 8 T. R RATED C.M.U.PARTITION W • T FINSIHED FLOOR I ?\•- - - -- _. I I) ; m HAVE R-A.2 INSU(ATION'BETWEEN 3OUT P.T.WQQD FUR 16'D.C.I FACED WITH 5/8,G.W.B. OUTSIDE FACE SHALT I 1•I\/ T 1 CONCRETE TIE BEAM ' LAP SIDING Br:HARDIPLANX I Y 77 1 Xd T d,(i CYPRESS L _ R VISIC - T - - - II, II =1 i 11 I 11' ;; I: I FINSLA.SUB Ii i Ii I Ii TAC COMM: -,.,-y.' 'K.Ii-.F'' -- a"_--- ' ,Ia�T`•1�`T ..ro+� ili 21'_0` ,I 11 I.i - _ .. _ • { - FINSIHED FLOOR\ J 1 I 11 iil JANUARY 091 t TYPICAL WALL SECTION - ' •• CONCRETE FOOTING k " 4 a Be y 3• SCALE:3/4"=1'-0" �sr' ,_SECTION AVERAGE CROWN OF ROAD • �� 'c �] SCALE:1/4"=1'0" I I r Drawn by:1 I �';- ��,:� G:Wrc:hitecturelProjectsl0fficeslAscotldwgs1CdslA-21 • APPROCIMATE LOCATION OFA l I r IR[HYDRANT EXISTING 6-WATER MN I PROJECT LOla _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ ._._._._._ -4- .r I e LEGEND: i 1 W i EXISTING MANHOLE yy r • PROPOSED MAf/HOLE _ eOm PROPOSED ELEVATION EXISTING MANHOLE RIM 18 70 R -,- DRAINAGE ARROW _ _ /^� N.E. 2ND STREET I -II II NE,.1 STREET •1&87 EXISTING ELEVATION •19.66 +T8.41('- - - - - - • - 4 PROP.FIRE HYDRANT CUT-IN NEW SERVICE WYE FOR �`/ SCALE:1/B"=1'-0" ,4 PROP.GATE VALVE Z 8'SEWER SERVICE PA V E D SAW-CUT&BUTTJOINT •,d.79 I 4 0 8 16 LOCATION MAP Z w EXIST GATE vALVE PRECAUTION SHALL BE MADE PAVEMENT-MATCH - '�Saa NOT TO INTERRUPT SERVICE [LOCATION MAY BE I • • _ H HANDICAPPED PARNINO AREA OF MODIFIED ACCORDING APPROXIEXISTING GRADES EXISTING PROPERTY LwEs PAVEMENT TO FIELD CONDITIONS _ /-SANNgRY SEWER MAIITE NTO BE VERIFIEr I 4 12 y U - REPLACEMENT ESTIMATED EDGE O= !// 15'-0 SETBACK - ~ a o EXISTING FENCE , / PAVEMENT 1790 'WITH 5-0 R.0 W. I I - W - •-•-0 P000R POLE80VERHEAD ONE %jj///O/ -- -- -- OPEN Al"BOTTOAA GRATE O Q TRAP SOLID AT TOPE l�B • ♦, I 1-1?ASPHALT 1-172-ASPHAL; -, GUY WIREri, 24.WIDE TYPE b3' C DENOTES AREA OF NEWASPRLLT -CURBL•UTS 22U :: A1.. 2Z-.O' �2. I Y11Y lI \`�I/, -� _ & '+`: ----;S `S • 5.;:•�,•. O O Mill RANKING.SEEDETAIL-SHEETS * - - _ - - - + _ ,. _.. - .- 'lam :',\ I :�A. -17 MIN SELECT FILL 1'<i L'. .S'. i'Vi % TTvg N> rn v.EXISTTNG CONC I p w SEE DETAIL `•dd6ddddddddddd R 8'FINE PEAROCK i.V8i d9dBddddL0dd 10 0 W <04 REMOTES AREA OF PAVEMENT I �` - r • ♦ Z Y O O -�-�- REMOVAL 4 FOR RFFUCENENT pFTF ' WALKWAY -b P•,•POSED 1 N F. -:�a • DENOTESS'VADEPAVERSKIEVJrW( +1b 5U r19,I • •TKO+ SLOPE v .� `f (SEEDETALdHEET2) • . `- y 66.00 ,�^ - + • •afB.18' A $R N�81� . - _ �-r ® 3/4•WASHED ROCK .O .. g milo, C P.L.80.00' 1 3'HIGH PICKET FENCE.SEE £'. ,� I LD I _ B/2 PROP CATCH BASIN •' r a y b N 8 514 PCL PROFILE GRADE LWE•SEE DETALL CO. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR 1£� S .. _ wyq{O ONE LAYER OF�'• irk IL'. DETWLS T ® _ E.T"y CO- SANITARY SEWER CLEAN-OUT ADJACENT PROPERTY/ 410 :� OZ' -AI U¢I g I • FOR THE TWO SIDES S CAP NON-PERFORATED ALUMINUM PIPE ,\ \ 11~ - S m� ' ��ii .�• CURB-CUTS WIDE L� ONE LAYER OF. •••JOINT• AND DOUBLE AT TOP I MRAF1140 v EONALEN >Na y FOR 7HE TYA7 SIDES B.F.P. [SACKFLOWPREVENTOR i3.. - �S AND DOUBLE AT TOP p',�,' C_-- DENOTES EXFIL CH K.4tit4 c=i�F- I cc U•LLp 2 NEW 6'SCH 40 PVC SS�S :`�j�v „ TO BE PROPERLY GRADED Tn/-•1 S RARY SERVICE a ID% i` C 7O CATCH BASIN 02 ::.,; 3%. TYPICAL CROSS SECTION-TYPE'E' END VIEW jNOTES: MINIMUM W441 CB#3 $5 �PpF�'= waR I i. ROOF DRAINAGE SHALL BE DIRECTED TO PROPOSED I ='.psi% '� 19 t0 a3 FOO - I o w :I FRENCH DRAIN DETAILS CATCHBASW01,283 C.O.C'O- �NL • RIM -!:aL�Crc�`'.. z0 dun - W I FERTOLANDSCAPEPLAN ��, i� .. •:;{u �', yw • N.T.S. ,2- TAPER ON STREET PARKING SPACES I R PROPER LOCATION OF ','•%.:£_.,�'t•ttt'>: K 'f%2`ai t ' N v ^ST.v A41 v : : S Pi O:'. I t• U sT st a v �£:£ £ra1 :..s,s r��t ^six ssr=s :r o o u 5q� m CURB AT 45 DEGREE ANGLES AND ONLY'FTYPE IC UT '�n,�'�.v,^ : • ti ' __:g'"m J8� I - NEOPRENEGASKETAT Ir CURBING IN RIGHT-OF-WAY I _ £_ j tNf` ik 1 u W 1 I• ALL CONTACT EDGESEU 3. WATER METER SIZES TO BE DETERMINED BY THE I ¢ - }� D { CITY OF DELRAY BEACH UTILITY DEPARTMENT ^. --'aa w Q 1 W ce W, I UPON BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION- ! pc' NG 6 HIGH SSA 0 ¢ _':g O a-w.i_ I H W OOD FENCE az ,;. .. O.`. .I Q 0_CO .__-_ --- ..__-._.-� SETBACK Iy 48 V gip, 19960 ,'+`•E C ti .> I LL I,4-'' `Zf O •p-! Ifs ¢ C .Q l^L_' I £:5: '. ,n I 473 wn,N 4 I SCUD PLATE ON W r, CV= �a: . - f �` i SEE NOTES k oA TOP OF BAFFLE 'M U )-EO 0 0 r; PROPOSED BUILDING ill's I l. ,�`� , "� Q •rt . . • FF.21.00: 'I. � £.n 1 ..Y / U) Q m �yr� sr„;?...: A, • _ 6 Fi SERVICE LI NE j I N . p b I 1 /��.\-TO BLDG I 1. I W a QtT- R £Y I 1 ., ❑• WATER METER I I •/��I < O 6U 44 1 1 - • At I •-- - • ETfR 9 Z Z. TRASH CAN(IREA ````'"�''� /w` • VARIES 'D'CURB '"2, .vaf.„. .c rc <�;C. _£_. .I ! -w I FrCORA A� - _44 i 44 - ( / V�SEE NOTE 3 SEE NOTE 1 Q SLOPE VAR: 1£S; 1~ti:.. on: '2•S Lr'••� w-� _ : --£V�;x GC I ., • C �e��Es i� l g C44I Z ""' 4 I. I C : 1 I BRACKET DETAIL BAFFLE DETAIL. > - `•♦- �` COc ATP T ,..it: Q T— 'Q. �` °t. k pVIDE24'WIDE 0' x,. ITYPEF - 31. Li 0 - 1OTIRBL7?) BICYCLF"R4CK - i Y IUR6-GUTS I NOTES FOR P.R lt.BASIN 51 'lOSAT10N - HALF. FOR MATCH EXISTING TNE JIE ' �, _13,93I1) 49DE t. T 'o I 1)AAFFLE SHALL NE THE SIZE INDICATED OH THE PLANS. M ACCESSACROSS -CUlTIq-ZlJr$�3T-0 PE 1 "T- I - co 0 GRADES(3:1MAX { 4. 17 p:! 2)in-GALVANIZED LAO BOLT INLFADSHELD(rep.) a SOLID j-. 8 SLOPE) - �� iI�EPAYEDOR(VJ:.Is ��[ _ A4CNG'XW$CUR6SINLY _ V 3 _ I HI ' (PLATE N - RENIWEDAj pER - P1; ii _ 25 W • I 3J Y+ELD OR USE(7)1?THRU BOLTS(SS) b • TOP �'ai, ECItCI717,6OF 2,5' ttl 18 6 1-f1 5 4.)GRATING SV411 BE OFFSET IF STRUCTURE IS USED AS - [`y Y1 +"-`�^ - 1 :.ILK[{ I. I OVERFLOVII BAFFLE FOR POUA)TION - T`{ 14.-41 SECTION 'Y - 1 Ivl 1\R1 { 1 4 j w4 ♦ S 2INIMIll. R�TADENT BASIN(P.RDJ j/Y N.T.6. • 1 f I _ _ b �•F V -� \_Ii4 o I f[�'iYTa W � 1. �."- ► CB- y 7C}�FIQ PERF..CAP B.# - F4 b� L?y �tl'�^} VARIES - - - f • BI - . '�1 ; l 5 18 PARKING 24'DRIVEWAY '3,•4. NOTE GRADE SLOPE }e- _D 12'-O" 9yY e-0 - y:G+ `� g. .2•e' T.a T!v •G TO BASE OF CURB FOR _ I III _ V C POSITIVE• DRAINAGE 1- { =-.� Ql z o m,Q TI. TO PARKING LOT • • '� tq' 18' CONC. `l* ,, A 1 L11RB:[TYR) _. ( "'. d`Sd a N VARIESobtrt. WHEEL STOR VARIES ,BUILDING FF EL o 21.00' �� ' I (.. { - OpO' 1 416i - •' w I TYPE E CB ' SLOPE VARIES r-�� ///-//0/ L 1., t•'.---'--� 4• �� • • •I w s P TYPICAL CATCH BASIN.WITH h ,;�yxsze',,� ��' .X.i,C' / t/ . ��d N o I POLLUTION F ETAROEN ' DEVICE U MATCH EXISTING 0 .O T1PE•0'Willi 3.5 I 5:0' I 12tl I ' 9.D' , -9.tl. 8.0' 8.D' • in -w m • . to SLOPE)TES CJti MAX 0 •_ A PIMTH CURB r199 I _ -- - DECORATIVE • 1 I I I N.T�5. p RENTER O - _ • i ,Y'_.i P LIGHT POKE iJ/1 ♦}B1 Q • D . �-" . CII { r 1 • _C LINE OF PROPOSE-D I I • a 6.Of1 I RNA V. INVERTom ELEV. LOCATION SECTION 'X - X` 'X I DEEP SWAIE . i .CBi 7YE I GRID 18J5 14.G0 OCAEAST 1 DRAWN: •48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING \ •l�E - I I I '2 C I SOLID 18 SP 14.42 W NONE j JB (µ' 1.12•ACSC TYPE S-1 i CALL TOLL FREE I •3 E GRID I1S.t0 ta40 SOUTH �.J SITE DATA AS PER SITE PLAN I CHECKED: - j 1.800-432-4770 I I © 6.5'UMEROCK BASE COMPACTED TO 98%AASHTO T-180. PROJECT AREA =6,798sf AMA SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL CENTER BUILDING AREA =1,324sf ! nPE SIZE _ I INLET •A' -a j 'c v 'E' RC.P. DATE: © 12'COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO 98%AASHTO T-180 j I PARKING 8WALK =2,740sf j - TOTAL PERV =4,084sf ! Ig 'C' 24r 3'-r x4• j 3'•P 11' 1s' 01/09/2004 TOTAL IMPERV =2,734sf . I I 'E• 3••0• 14••6' 3's 14•-4• 1•-s 3v JOB NO. p I -E MOD" 0-0- 14.45 BA A' 14'-4 1'-5" 48- 02-812L36 SHEETNO. C10F2 GENERAL NOTES PAVING. GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES a IS LNG GROUND 1. CCNTNACTOi SHALL PROIEC/ALL PERMARENI REFERENCE T. SIBGRADE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS SND•N w THE ENONEEA REMAINING SACKFUL.BAY AND SURFACE 30' LHOVU•LFNTS AVD TAKE ALL PRECAUTOINS NECESSARY TO MUD \ / ; MATERIAL OP IA PLACED AND COMPACTED I I SURVEY MARKERS DURING CONSIRIDCMI.V.CwTAACTw SHALL DRAWINGS THE SJBGRAOE MALL BE[(IMPACTED TO A DFN9rY SWAG�� ..DBR OF THE MAOMUM D.TMSTY AS PER APPROPRIATE SPECIFIGTgNS Wifiy BE RESPONSBLE FOR RIDLACELIENT OF PERMANENT REFERENCE T-IB0.• DETERMINED BY AASHTD YiNWIW 95i PER AASN10-7-180. , MONUW]ITS DISTURBED DM<CONSTRUCTOR.A7 NO D 8'LUX.SQE �12•� ADp:ONAL COST TO THE OWVEA. 2 LWERXX BAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WTM j / (YYR.DO%DED/51IY 5 REQUITED FOR NON- 2.I 2 AyT SECTOR 200 OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SHALL BE REIIOs'ED AND PROPERTY DISPOSED OF WARN THE STANDARD SPECVICATOMS FOR ROAD AHD BRIDGE CON51AUC110N, ' AP FAL56 )� • r li.CAP rw \ 0P•44 AREAS OUTSIDE OF ROAD R1CHT- MATERIAL SUCH AS Yl1IX,MARL.AND DEBRIS MD lakilAddial r/JC><N:SIOR lr CHAkA:1 POST LWrcs aF CONSTRUCTION.CLEAN GRANULAR AS SHOWN ON ME ENGINEER DRAWINGS AND SHALL BE COMPACTED \\\\\\ \\\ - / .AR MATERIAL MALL LATEST EDIl1pN.711E MOWESS O<THE UIFRO•X BASE STALL BE /� TO A DENSITY OF 6.O<THE IM MUM DENSITY AS DETERYNED yl y,i /•.� T w I \\\\\` \\\ COMPACTED TOO YIYYU4P�pE8Dz OF I BE USED BACKF LL AND PAGED M 13 NCH LIFTS SHOH T_laa w 'Q-- 9%. /�� S. CONTRACTOR SMA1 BE RESPO:SEILE FUR ME PROTECTION CF • IO►• % fi ;acur \ \ YApYUY DENSITY.PER AISHTO-T-IB0. / 3. PRIME COAT 6HALL BE 4Y ACCm0u10E WM SECTRw Jm O'T1w ria a.) 2�4A%.SQE Al C)aSTWG UNCE9ptOla]UIIU71E5 wREIHER OR NOi SHOroR ic/i.F IOU'.]/A• \ �` ON ME PUNS UDJTFS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR SPECIFICATION PP ROAD AND BRIDGE COSIRUCTION,LATEST • �i_.y�s:.•[.� /i Y.UT \ \ REFERENCE ONLY AND MAY HOT OFNCT ACTUAL LDCATICNS THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF IRAVSPwTAIIw STANDARD _ TCP VEIN 0 EAAsa O \ BOOING MATERIAL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL MUTT TO CONSTRUCTION. EDITION.PANE COAT SHALL BE RC-70 OR ASPHALT EMULSION ILAA v[w .us r :w ..,,. 6 PER IA 510�D-T- ACTOM LOCATOR ANp DEPTH OF iHOR UN6 P ARPUCATON ROT LESS PR.W 0.0 GALLONS PER SOVARE TARO OR SHATa BC<SP..=TO COORDINATE AND - A' w%) -./.e' j_�rF l FOR 1 Pica DURING CONSTRUCTION AT AN/CARADIN ROOM CAST FOR RE TA.BASES COaum Mac BASES �- "S.' _!A: i-i -"'e •, FOR TIE DLQ.'ER17p1G OF PoMEA ONES AND/DR HQgNG SDYµE YARD FOIi sHEIAROCK OR ' Add FOYER '7' .-+/Jx 3/:e'' i/u' TO THE OWNER. 6.4.227_ • Al f CENTRAL SPR"i.ifATIOR C'A\EL POST S, 4, TApc COAT SRRALL BG w ACCORDANCE ROTH SECTION 30)OF s� ®' CURB-CUT DETAIL 1 CO RACTw SHALL BE FLSPO SR E TO COORDINATE AND PAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD w LC'_-BM:L Am.AARROL•w-ID SUD.. FOUR THE REPLACEMENT of TRAFnC LORDS F oAUAGm DURING `COL RCATONS FOR ROADl ABS iRW00F CONS'iHALT V.LATEST ao,MLR..W.pl. .:on 1. BEDOHG SHALL CONSIST OF N- CONSRUCTw AT NO A[OITIAVA COST TO T�0 OM D•QLY SCOT R a os o:a0 a Gym L� /TU GRANULAR MATERIAL OR WASHED N.T.S. MER. RS-a C MALL COAT SHALL BE EMULSION ED (AEP)T GRADES 0 E•ms'.OKVsms--a'N v,_D'w Jel ERO'K 3/8•-7/8•SIZING. UNSUITABLE IN-SIN RS-3,CRS-2.OR ASPHALT EINLSON PRWE(AFP).TAIX p [-ASLA¢'J'ilx»p ttPl'AL 5`OP MATFRUIS SUCH AS BUCK.DEBRIS AND LARGER ROCKS DELL BE RETAINED. 6. ALL ELEVATORS COAT SNAIL BE APPIJED AT A RATE OF APPL1CATw BETWFFJ • c r[(SAYS)OR L'A.-sLFTa-Y • SW`ruCEu_Ni -I I-1/A' •2•a_-, ••OR 8'WNFAE DINS REFER 1D ROAD.YMWUN FINISHED FLOOR 0.02 AND QOB GALLONS PER SQUARE YARD. U sP:¢:s Aao.L. 2. THE PIPE SHALLCOMPACTION BE ALLY SUPPORTED FOR RS ENTIRE IFNGM WRIT MM..ROAD tRONW ELEVATION wACXESCR TA CREATOR S. TAPE 5-1 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SSI SURFAGE COURSE SHALL BEM Z APPROPRIATE COW ACTION UNDER THE PIPE HAUNCHES. B1v+RA SU DcAL5 Ms mist SHOYM DN PLAK EREYATION(5)SHALL BE 31Ap'NG.Y.D.,COw 1•MCMES AROK O s Des.:slrLL MVGLD LMnaE.POST r.In �y/'u• 3. THE PINE SHALL BE PLACED W A DRY TRENCH. OF TRANSPORTATION STAVDNi0 SPZ of OE RON A DEPARTMENT BALL CPELr FAO:NYSn Pig AS,..-A-I:) (717.4... CPK FJ.iLS.z¢DC,Sn[L;. i] ` PAVEMENT REWEW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED r) rsxta i A->L�o'ry 5-0/a' 4. BAWL.MALL BE FREE OF UNSUITABLE WTERNL SUCH AS LARGE 7. SRO'ORAWNGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO ME ENGINEER FOR 5 FOR ROAD AND ICJ I moo-M.Jc':KM w'is"�D �A•AwaVs J\ BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION.LATEST ACCITOM THE TWOmESS OF \ BY TARE CNpMEER OR BY ME APPROPRIATE GOKAHNG AGENCIES. NNE AIRFACE COURSE SHALL BE AS MORN ON THE DETAILED Q :Seosom Po p'Lamon M:As WG✓.IU LY POSS.B.E ROCK MUCK.AND DENTS DRAWNGS K C h 3' R1 [ OR s.E PLuq. • 5. DENSITY TESTS ME REQUIRED M 1 FOOT OATS ABOVE THE PIPE AT B. CONTRACTOR SMALL BE RC DI0ULE TO SECURE AND PAY TOR. '1 "1 tE ROOMS OF 400'MAXIMUM.OR AS DIRECTED BY THE INSPECTOR. AT NO ADDITIONAL COST-TO THE OANEA,ALL NECESSARY RN ALL UNSLTABLE MATERIAL SUw AS YUOK MARL AND OFTLRIS RJR.. TYP. STREET STOP SIGN EA�1°�emu_sLO-AV PERLBTs.FEES AND urotsEs; SHALL BE coMENT DI REMOVED To to TSA OUTSIDE THE EDGE / B. THE DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR SMALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE TRENCH I OF THE PAVEMCTNT CN EACH SDE I HARDPAN NS ENCOLWTERED N.T.S. SAFETY LAWS MD REGULATIONS 10' �-1 3' 0'N PAVEIE T SBAR CE S CONTRACTCR SHALL DC BESPCNSIBLE FOR GIVING THE REQUIRED IN SWALES,IT SHALL BE REMOVED TO A 0.TM OF 2 FEET AT 7. SEE SEPARATE DETAIL FOR'PIPE INSTALLATION UNDER EXISIWC PAVEMENT NOTICES AND COYPLYNG ROTH ALL PERILT(S)CONDITIONS NE INVERT MO BACA/Up ROTH CLEAR GRANULAR -��.•R1 MATERIAL -�W SECOIID RORAR P IS CaN1RACi0R SHALL BE RESDO:S2LL TC COwONATE AND PAY Z 5. THE AFFECTED AREA SHILL BE RESTORED TO E007L OR BETTER CONDITION BOAR STOLS ARE PAYED 7. SECUENpNG OF COISTRUCTw SHALL BE SUCH THAT AL', La I AS REQUIRED. 3000 P.SL CONCRETE CONSTRUCTIFCR THE HOLDING OF OTHER UTIFTY POLES UII AT NO ADITONAL COST TO THED DURING UNDERGROUND WSVLLAIK HS OF ANT NDID THAT MARL COME UNDER THE PAVEMENT OR E000 TEN FEET CF THE EDGE OF >I�3 TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL ALL CONCRETE MALL BE 3000 PSL UN FSS 0 4T WSE PAVEMENT SAIL BE INSTALLED PWOR TO ME COVSRUCDIDN >e N.T.S. FLUSH HEADER CURB SPECFIED. OF.ME BASE COURSE ou� N.T.S. V. PAK]pR TRAFFIC STRIPES AND'MIXINGS SHALL BE IN Zb 12 ALL U7EME S Of THE ON SHALL BE W ACCORDANCE ROTH THE ACCORDANCE WM SECTION 710 AND 711 OF THE FLORIDA ALL CONCRETE REQUIREMENTS OF WEELOCAL3.0 UTILITY. DEPARTYA T Cf lAARSPCRTATC STANDARD SPECIFICATIONSFa 13 ENGINEER SHALL NOT BE RESPMSBLE FOR ME SAFETY OF MR ROAD AND BADGE CONSTRUCTOR.LATEST EDITION. THE WCRXERS OR THE GENERAL FEUDS ccriaL.CTCA SHALL FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATWV TRAFFIC OPERATION ACCORDANCE WITH OCO)PATOI:AL SAFETY N HEALTH MANUAL ON ENIFCRII TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVISES FOR STREETS BE RESPO.4R,E FOR PROVIDING SAFETY TO THE SOURCES STANDARDS INDEX Na.173w.LATEST REVISON.AND/OR �I��ON��SHA)REOUAELENTS ABS THE SAFETY a WAC. YS AND/OR M BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC [/] S• P,RpnpOP OSAAY aAaR 16 µL MATERIALS AND NoRnAmKHP'MUST BE W ACCORDANCE S. ME CONTRACTOR SHALT SURINT TO THE ENGINEER THREE(3)NANwaL F Ic AAO MDR 0101 SOYA (57 tl WM ME LOCAL UTUTY STANDARDS AND SDEQIICATONS CERTIFIED COPIES OF A CHGLCOL AND SIEVE AIALYSS OF iQyi b � SURFACE R ORSTI IS CONTRACTOR SHAY PROMOE ENGINEER,ARCHITECT.MAD OWNER THE SHELLROCX BY A STATE OF;LORCA CERTIFIED LAB WHEN <OWTAUDaOP SO {yR�RI ACURRENT UARIUTY WSIRANCE CERTIFICATE FOR NOT LESS S5D0.00aCORSRUCi1NG A SYEUROp(BASE Fw ROADIYAT. E-.•I `L�:« SAND/I AV>i SDAA2 ATM T6. PRO-CCNSRUCTON MEETING S-I PIQ .I-ig- - ROUSE REQUIRED BEFORE STARTING P-'•Y _ _ CONSR;una. OaaEQE�t (m[iAco j •. •.•.••• I CY PA 7. $ R• EN No.A Noon WATER To...ENT IYMEW Ia. RFPIACDmIT BABE I '� h M g„.k: Nn o Ir QC .zwi tYiMY In 73 I PwYERs E J • R �i ��, Do FO /MPACT R Q LI. R v�ICAO om 13ra Q fL �� CATi mNaL E VIAW U ebb TEL Tr;Na{O IY CAC •-R>e-I I I<I'-D' I I I• I. Ige1 • I w �i (y¢f LAI QT RR6 tl n. gpd 9 • {'"Tcz� ° a rA.n _ \ 3000 PSI .z7 I->- b M. IR•• T AM T10iTc°ClRioc+um A 00.RRI R' Dm w ATccou�AN�E - _ - - #5 BAR CONCRETE ce.2 iiiiiiii ...Pr 3/4•DIAL HOLE C/3 Z-) �� ' • o aDs EaSTwo BASE WaawR NON Ott RMn., W W.Va.ac a soma MATERIAL SHALL H F OUT. co Ha 2 R\4 Mom BIAOL at PLR® TWIG ThI aT w AMAULIIC c�iHc #4 BARS T8a LONG QA' (�T•O°'�" COUNTERSUNK [Yi7 irr Two a.-H°APM ma oi1Y95DB•'AMDAnA�OAI ._:... i-t/s'SAND BEDDING • •$SGIOMD BEOpq DE'IAA D].1 DDIFTY PFA AA9H T-1IA(MAY • PATDSD AT/TA of ID.U215 UCO 7P DD%pFR AASNTO T-I60 I W C • I •T MGOiSs- i a NW.Avr.con SHALL BE cob Y couPAOTEO sueGRAOE E•• oeT TD AZ IMwE.. �a::..��:'�4. • NOTES S ASPHALT CwaN1 PAYDWHr SIA)VAO • I 4'UYEROCII BASE mMPAC)ED TQ DB:O PEA IPI 1.FOR PIPLi W 10]a"ACM. -�aMR S'NAN BE Wrv..w�PA/LIT', 2 lY D.wa .0 ROOMED w A L a N G 6 T•] MK a6 6•UMEROCX BASE COMPACTED TD R&i PER BDTTou ELEYARaS MOVE RIE WAITA TAM. F ORAK CUM • TYPE "D" CURB AASITO T--IB0 INS DE Po 3 7 OF WAY.' ♦' / • SHALL BE PROVIDED ABOVE EDZDNc ROCK AND IIIAIER CUSP IIaE 4'FLOW-ABLE F%1(100 P.S,I,YM) LONG RE(NFOR.J VI 3.ISS/W AEan®ow ALL soLIONW . I TUTS I . • PAVER BRICK SEDITION FOR CONC. WHEEL STOP Li STORM SEWER MANHOLE PAVEMENT REPAIR DETAIL GU 1.1 I ALL ON-SITE SIDEWALKS N.T.S. Cq U.S FOUNDRY No.S76BH-ORS COATED Ug FIA 78m OR�R s\ '•TME BENDS AS RECLLRED Uu APpRO� l�R I AK WADS-130D-ISIIEIt' HANDICAP Sw(FTP-SO) BALL VALVES 8 011 PREVENTER ` OV7 / N)llr VALvE BOX D MEET KEo's GONAL ��i 1 Tr E L COPPER PM._ Tl� 2/5 PROPERTY A.-ANSKM NWT 18•_ i ..WALNJ .TYPE. 'POE HIPPIE _ ,, - 8'PEE L MPPLE to EACH SDE \ o Rf DELRAH / LBFE MATERIAL !, o TEE - ---.- G=f. i�li III. t I w•wTlaur uww GCA is �I:>♦1\ " RCS) Ilea „PE L COPPER ,i � �I, E.I..; POUR °"cRwoCOEC ie A __ _ �e eL E �� DWELL STOP PPE .PPE SUPPORT(TYP.) SC `°w LIEPMATG N SODDED AREAS Ap STRIPE (SEE DETAIL BE10W) rJ _��i!i!i!•!-!1• PAVED SLOE W l0 C WTERE CREA SEWER WAIN / PVC P&E 'OD ^E !•- SURFACE 1/B"PER TOOT YOL •j HANDICAP / 5'AAI.P SLEEVE �'\ 6•I C ♦' R 1;,.-• SYMBOL (TYP.) • 1/4'GWIFER V F• O I I!ii;'i_S'i'•L ' T• : ';..'...,.......�- \�\\\\• '�` „s�1:,�. •F IN W AwTE1 �� BALL VALVE • (Au-ANloua). O o W ii • \ •\•\\! - ( ,),'S., As FAR II�REDD • / wsYE WM Box _ _ jQ, .s ' \ �( 2 PKK HOES �I%I �'/ �%` UNDISNRBEO SOIL ` n��4DL 8•PVC PPE(Spl 10) --1 �/.n - Y QEAR .0i Y 8 • 1 ` INVERTED THREADED ' .. -� ��I v / PR-Fr ^7J p4'2pN,A. P.V.a PNO 1 ; C%24'S0.CCNC. ��IrI1)' SLOPE t�TO V. _- ,, • LL `3. >D .••1 111 �l1 - N-tY o.c.E.W p 7 WA-N EACH SDE RIII I/8'PER FOOT TOIL I+ CUll IY z 6'iHK ,.1 • S'd'xe'li•pL 8'-0' S'-0' If I �' I �I.I�I/ CONC.PAD �I_I.I` T T �I •r ICI CONCRETE COLLAR SCHEDULE NO CLEANOUT ON EACH BRANCH yy Fk R ' WM STEEL OU.UR CMG a'-45'WIE PVC CLEANWT SANITARY DOUBLE SERVICE MALE SERVICE g,VO I S CE AREA - LZEV. 1•N�1 Q • / -- CONNECTION AT ..)IL1.7g9 �1'-I 2 X µ �//�/%////%////////� 4'-45'ELL SEWER YAW R/7Y IR:E I 'I(- II- - i 11 8'YIN SERVICE ME LINE Y a'-0' 121 7-C Y-o' p_0' 2'%2'%t/4•7NK E COVER RING AlM.I.V. I lrr i 0.E - 3 5 IF-BUT. _ IYAY 6•z Y z 3/6'INK ARAFPIPEW :;:_:.::...•..� / I R/W w EASEMSHT UNE ALUMINM PLATE AT'Le PEWBOLTS -4 2 RUGS OF SEWER GRAVITY IMO ISANITARY SING,F SFRVICF PROPERTY LINEPARKED 6TALL OWEN90N5: 3/'.EDGE 31YPE CONC 316 9TNNlE55 STEEEL41r BAIINELK �/ /%�� BOLTS AHD WASNEI✓g ` ': %/ir..IS •3/4'STAINLESS -' SEWER ARAM B•MIL SEANCE LIRE 3'YAKWWY (2MANSON REED ANCHOR scut)BRIIX STEG BOLTS!NU15 • I I I Is. CLEANOUT COMPSALT So�o' u'acE.W DRAWN: 3 ut)Imo LAN.", I AND 1YASHER. 4. IN- - a CURSES MAY I I CAST IN CORBEL NOT to EXCEED l CAS ALL TOROCL. MAY ARMY HANDICAP 1Yx 18'PLUS 5'RAMP AREA 2•CUEAR r� FRAME BE USED(a SHAPED) OARED PLUG TD RAW CO EAYMEN7 LINE r 6'z 4'NARCO•PVC REDUCER .��iii.`;:i:�:•?!.;.i.ar:: - . REDD.FOR CLMNECTION 70 CLAY UNTIL PLUMBER NOTE: -f CHECKED: • pmts. SERVICES(DONUTS NOT uwY,ED) MAKES canEcna+ t. SERVICE LATERALS stun tERM71ATL BORE P - PIPE SUPPORT DFTAU, 1. COLLAR R REQUIRED ONLY TEEN YARHOE IS(AT OF PAYMENT. WM CLFANOIff AND MARKED ROTHA 3'%a'7REAIEDDEPTH 3 FEET. - - NOTES: - - . Z FRAME AND COVER SHALL BE U.S.FOUNDRY Na576B (OR EOUAI} 1.ABOVE GRACE PIPING SHALL BE BRASS OR TYPE'L•COPPER TUBING MANHOLE A0.VSTWG RUGS SHALL BE CAST DEN.UST'TYPE B,OR EQUAL i ALL COPPER'S..RPRE SHALL BE MADE ROTH 65/5 SODER- 01�08�2G04 3. 2 DO UBLE 11EFP TEE SHALL BE USED FOR VERTICAL CLEANOUT STACK aRPZ BAp(FLO PREVEWIFR IS RCOLLRFD w ACCORDANCE WIN CITY Of DELRAY BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES TITLE V,CHAPTER 5250. JOB N0. STORM SEWER MANHOLE FRAME & COVER TYPICAL CLEANOUT DETAIL WW 5.1 SEWER SERVICE CONNECTIONS DETAIL WW 4.1 TYPICAL PARKING SPACES DETAIL RT 4.2 REDUCED PRESSURE ZONE BACKFLOW PREVENTER PW 10.2 02-8I2I28 SHEET NO. C2DF2 . . . . ._ . . --• - . . _ . _ . . . - . . _ . .. . .._ . . ...... .. _L._ .._. ___. _. . i ! 41,• . ( . 1 1 g ,! ; ; I '05E I LANDSCAPE DATA .0 . tal INTERIOR LANDSCAPE DATA 1 . .r.. . I TOTAL SITE AREA os per site pbon) 73C9 SF i I TOTAL PAVED AREA(cis per site p!cn) 2740 SF JERRY TURNER TOTAL INTERIOR LANDSCAPE 274 SF I AREA REQUIRED ! TOTAL INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA PROvIDED 274 SF (os per site pion) & ASSOCIATES t.1 - - TOTAL INTERIOR TREES REQUIRED - - - - _ _ _ _ -q i TREES 1 ... TOTAL INTERIOR TREES PRCb1DED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • N.E. 2ND STREET I PERIMETER LANDSCAPE DATA 'LAND PLANNING I ; 122 LP PAVEMENT AREA ADJACENT ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN /Fx\ I. A.DJACENT TO ROW/OTHER PROPERTY i 2 \3/ i 41)• •'bN,1\ TOTAL PERIMETER LANDSCAPE AREA RECUIRED 610 SF • - 1 r '2.5 i I TOTAL PERIMETER LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED 436 SF I 1 TREE/30 LF REWIRED ' I TOTAL TREES REQUIRED 4 TREES 905 JONES FR ANKUN ROAD S 7-- \ I I -_,--,__I I Likk;•5*..t..t.:4X.c.t...5.. s,. I TOTAL TREES PROVIDED , 4 TREES RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606 (919)851-7150 \ ../TiMIS I M.N.30%a,-REQUIRED PERIMETER&INTERIOR LANDSCAPE - 6 AREA TO RE PLANTED IS SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS 277 SE. 5th AVENUE i 1 \ "",444.4t. ... ,I 112/ I REQUIRED PERIMETER et INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA 884 S." DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA 33483 PLANTED AREA REQUIRED 265 SF (561)276-0453 • • • . I I Sight Distance Triangle PLANTED AREA PROWDED ' 377 SF NEW 5' WIDE COtICRETE WALKWAY IIIIMIIIIIIIMPAlea..4arlik " I NATIVE PLANT DATA •PH3 ILoCT _ . x -.view' t. 50 Z OF ALL RECU•RED TREES TO PE NATIVE ASCOT, • c.,07.11itreCtel: \ 111-0,191:40.:.* \ -....,........:.,./., ,,...........re...0...N...1. , AR Vir 25%OF ALL CTHER PLANT AT'ORIAL TO BE NATIVE TOTAL'REQUIRED TREES 7 TREES DEVELOPMENT 1 VAR e:t141;!A-4 'AR - •• TOTAL NATIVE TREES REQUIRED 4 TREES ...4-o.k. TCTAL NATIVE 1ZEES PROVIDED 6 TREES efi'144404Cr;Wel 3 -1- .c'.:.•. 74, I . i ef,f,_'-jealgitp*-:-.4 TOTAL REQUIRED SHRUB.AND CREXJNO CSIVER AREA 265 SF e•;:--;.-PlZ,Z9:34.1,;:"..---, tev.Aal Awls.4J-.,...- 1 f - I NATtVE ARE.A REQUIRED " 66 SF i 0 • 1 I NAT:VE AREA PROVIDED • 217 SF `g; ,.,,,,..,--41..,:z.g....:4w.........,-.3.. . . "Airla I • . 1 EXISTIN(3 - ivAR 10,,,..74,14,w,voie,,,,,, A,(c.3 •1115,40tim•'"Itpi ) • • N II . \ • . • - . . . •1110 Allik. u-'.4$14 :--iu-I40-4 ....--,•,4ip44,, ,,•--,,,,::•:••••,. /Ilk In N.,..„ i - PLANTINC.3 NOTES: H r D G.:- . 1 '&0. 1,4i;01•$41'.4. lei 11M, : is ir,-=---41th ssz.445.31,0KA e, WY ..,. .....\ I I I ka Man:roaterIes shoo conform tc the etcodaras Tar Flee-lie No.1 or belt.-os 9:win in"Crocco and Sionaorcts lor.lemsery Picots Part I.Februcry 1995. ' . ii',;:s• 9.'74115N5t4IZTOWar, . " ../". . .. : Amigo AzitA*: noo Ay,,,,,1 i:(5,5,1; ..., . \ t. State of.1crico,Deportment of Agrictore,Tasaposeee. E I D -..-.---.....!--i , • • t..14. ..< ,... Z.41...43. .7 ...s2e4 r........a .,..s......... 6 • - \ I ..0.s.,1 be clear.ono reasonably tree of weeds end oests or diseases. 'E.' I • • • - •. . r- ' : qtk ' . • - Cfr4V.. - IreA N.' 4.1 nOrnie<ape 0..0 rat,mitered voith:fees.sitrkbs or cround covers shot be sopeec ell.St.AusJetne plarctont-ulleee otherwLse nOled. I g ' • 00 .•••••,, 1a-7 .I..- FX• .1Q ZW' :464 cl•:::7::rcer.,:c..1..1 tie,a,:lanth.e:ajto p,nrec.eria:pw.a.,rndInuia:urP.cp,1:::ode A - FiC Eticalyof.is rn.lch. '' i INEMI eat t4 = 2 (-7- mit 17 - h4413 7t1P-. z 1 8 IMMNII giL 800 . - 'Kee'.-., 1...-1 :-.to,uo,of planting mete-is,to aria damage. INIMINII '0. i - • • • - ' .,Allir:7.1 401 IfilibtitOki >.; . Delray Beach, FL cr.Li. .roti • : ; ! ii H . - • • .• • • - -logy <1 ..`;`il-lil,'.i.,'4°,.4,..eni,t,l'rce•,1:t.re..,,,rlit L.,coc-41:="re'''ed t' • I ' - • I I. - : M§,0.,::- j G iF •Rcs.,,,c,.;5,.....m.. .... .,, I se' : • ' - • mg • 1_-_,mor , . 1I. • _....,,,,w44...., _ • . -7 . . lay , A.Veef ave to te staked oho/or ti.ned cs 1n0kOled Ora tre 13,0nUng detODS. 2/11/P4- MEN . ' P.,$) • .4.1b, •.._ :.v.0, i: - i....: ,044.1.0. ".... I - Sight Distance Triangle AL clam mated.to be bockfaisa with.a relistbre o't/3 approved Flenao peat.1/3 approved topsoil or,1/3 clean sond.•To IP:a rptrtare odd 15 p.n.s ti L;J .‘11:.• AM, 1 -...;: g c...L.14,....v.Av,..Ii-7 ol 6-5-C'earise-per csble yard. Tues.4iy rnix a parte Isla,to afoc,cg •-.1 IIMINIIIIIIIIIIclig*ilir. --03: 1 r ' i • f"piort ohs: I I 1 , i < 1 . iimmoimummosimma-giek.,,._ Mk..4*. - . •.. . limummilioniiiroiti..":4 .. 11:- i.N,., . . ---.4:,.....c.-.......,. _ I.. .. : ;,..r ,• - . .....00&,----,-vz..._. I 7he Co...biota she Ioy mit Pie locations of the piont aerie and contact tee Landscooe A-cratec,for approval Peoee the instellatign of the Pint T9'-e7ci. 11:c La.:escape Architect rdoy forli.ist tne location of!he plants bal.'s I 9., . MEN . - ,N.,,,t•. a, , ,-• ,_.•,,,,-.1i,s,_.6.....„„„..,1= . -,.$4. ...... _-..- -,--0, ..r.r.,,.-!, r,..,_,...„ ,.., .,,ktf.TRiViigf"N . Or:,,,--4.44 ' • . ../TA.- .1,..4. I la 0 fig41.3•113V.es7(ttai :4•"..1.Tt.S1 itt:,,F*3 I•r-PrAs• ".;;N.,::......se,a4sktfolatealsit Nte.. egt:rt:stvIt 12 All quoetiliss on the a:ens cre intends.,cs a pica 0,0 0,04 be verified by the MI= ''' , £414`..&attlftgelfX:Z1 ..s.iter.b.::.a ..;.%$1.I;;CSY.:&.. 13'..4•4:0'.1:44.. /5.433:;litflidalStatreatt%tItlii ", CA.* , Contractor with a eunprehensire plont tore-QM'SnquIr.Ony dicrepanc:as I ... I I "• '. ;:..: •!:Ark" • • :..' -41P-411411ir i. • ' ' .: : ' " ' ' "i •.'ill lir.... i , i 001-tr.the Londscona Architect te to os notified for olorillactIon'prior to: Maine. - MEMO koy e.Sting plant moterks to',loin sad:be protected st,Sing construction yids T “ .. . . • 3 abesier"ba"nie'to be oprovsa by toe Land-seem,IrchIlsoL • • . . ii 0 . .. I . - . . . . • •• • . MI Icriesccee Istcods rekl s,lanais:zoo or...'that are:adjacent to VelliC410, ,se 0.,..Ve req.:V.1 to be<aped Mtn Concrete non-toountoale corblea at 1 '':;_ . . . • . . . .. •1 . • . ' A a I I • ' • •. -; , 44,•,,,kss-.0,a* I ru Agek I Am /AL RE.0 . .. • v. -03aU.. ...,., • • •vr 4 '117 ' 4 . . • ; I :=7.4::;.,00;,,ci tnitooRcifsl_sodds.picue,n,l.%nlh torais.etr.tt 1..n...to IN. • . . :I I! . • . Al.'onduces 0.03 ere le be,filvalea 10 Fori0 a minim:.of 150Z coveroge. 1.sIng XIV...0 p,ineoke. ' -pi . : . iI . . 11 ' . ' . i > I Pn I II . i . ! : : AlriikiliTi .-"---...., PLANT LIST . :,. : . itik-7.4.1ej Drainage TN A . ••••• . . 4.---7-71 . .... . • . KEY PLANT NAME OTT HT SP REMARKS OVSF.... IIIII0 . ANN Annao'floieers 25 6" 10" I 1 I S•ht Distance Triangle 01Y Redtip C000plurn 70 24" 18" I 1 I . I : ' ' ' ..1 1 I ' '• 1/4. :' ....:.ii 41.• •i 11111111111E NE'S ' ; HI 041 ). Ziii ''.-5‘r\-)` 1 1: " I . : 1 . . I I - L ; ti. 4443i*:tIrekt4•41i. . FIC Ficus He8ge . 6 24" 18. : =NM I - I 111111111111.1111/MOR I. I I 1 Il I !. . '. ' MO 4,.:•:.V. FX Foetal Palm. 8 . 14' •DRAWNeeteeleCliECKF.Demeremism I i I 7 o I '-----lei I II I I . ; . 1 I -l 'thS ...."16Veeklp I I --‘1 ' [I I i .- . toW.kt1:::i# R.IE1';'.0 RVC:e:::nisio°1:1'74 r IC"296 eo5 ie ic2 2:22c': I at di • I 111111111111.1111111 411,4•• • A; I 1*...4:4:****ii , ROD Roe elenji Pair., Dquble Trunk •SCALEeersOATE.1. 1 ..- 111111•111.11.1.01.11.11111.111IMI ..lifki I, eNeVitsteil.'09 I . '.' Zarit40 JAS c w Live Oak = l'o' 1/9/04. , 4 58 TH Pink Tobebuir. 11 1 1 ,4 • . ,......si,tt.*, 1 VAR Trieette 12 24. 18. •TiTLE . . I I ..... ' . : of fePiti .- ."-. ' ' - . %IWO*.Rt.: 151' Wort.etn 60 8- 10" • . I . . •- . • .:P.1:41'4:tii. 1 • . - I 4111111) if" z .%(P)/Agrei4._,WrsgOrA'ff610WWAI.F!) :.4e..."itAt . • 1 . . .. , - IkIIMITA,04110000000000-4110.0,111.9.M.Lenkoiagom_ i -ste•Attet-• I Lan dsc•ape, i E 1 . •- •• • i P.L = 66' 0" Plan -1 p. • 1 • . ! - 1- I I II I • 60 - _ (1,..c.,-, 1 I •FiLC N3.eminme.3043 ND.=Emmet=i 7 2 I d t 5331 I •SEALSHEET NO. ro ' I I ri . i . L_ i , L.- .;->. of 1 , ! % A._ _ UCIRAY OUCH HISTORIC PRESERVATION N BOARD I,I 1� MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT I Agent: Tony Keller Project Name: Ferrara Duplex Project Location: 136 NE 1st Avenue ITEM .'BEFORETHE BOARD The item before the Board is a request for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated variance for construction of a new two-story duplex at 136 NE 1st Avenue, Ferrara Duplex, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 11, Block 67, Town of Delray (previously known as Town of Linton) which is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The .24 acre property is presently vacant. There have been no recent Board or administrative actions pertaining to this property. The applicant is now before the Board for the construction of a 3,780 sq. ft., two-story duplex. _. .- _« d,.. - PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..... _,. E; The project consists of the construction of a 3,780 sq. ft., two-story, traditional Florida style duplex. The concrete block building consists of two units; one on the first floor and another on the second floor. Each floor consists of 1,590 sq. ft. (1,705 sq. ft. including the covered porch on both floors). The proposal also includes the construction of a two- story accessory structure to the rear of the main dwelling that includes a 516 sq. ft. garage on the first floor and a 516 sq. ft. guest cottage on the second floor. A 16'x28' pool is also proposed in the southwest corner of the property behind the main dwelling. ) The main dwelling consists of a two-story design with wrap-around porch and vinyl clapboard siding. The traditional Florida design inspired by French vernacular architecture displays a front facing gable and bonnet roof with gabled dormers on the south and north elevations. The roofing material is a 5-V crimp, mill finish metal. The proposed porch displays decorative woodwork with knee supports and picket railing. Fenestration consists of 6/6, single hung sash, impact resistant windows, paneled front Meeting Date:April 7,2004 Agenda Item: IIIA. 136 NE 1st Avenue Old School Square Historic District Page 2 entrance door with transom and gable pediment, and paired, rear French doors with divided light sidelights. Decorative paneled shutters flank the windows and front entrance door on the east elevation. The front façade also displays faux triplet pedimented windows within the front facing gabled roof. The proposed shutters are ornamental only as the shutters are fixed and no windows will actually be installed. The proposed two-story garage/guest unit is connected to the main dwelling via an exterior staircase. The structure mimics the architectural features of the main dwelling including the vinyl clapboard siding, 6/6, impact resistant, single hung sash windows with paneled shutters and 5V crimp mill finish metal roof. Paneled overhead doors provide access into the garage from the alley. A driveway is also proposed along the north side of the duplex with access from NE 1st Avenue. A 6' white, concrete block perimeter wall with stucco exterior separates the pool from the alley along the west property line. The wall is angled to ensure proper site visibility between the rear parking and the alley. A 4' high white picket fence is proposed along the south property line to screen the pool, however, it does not extend beyond the footprint of the building to the east. A color scheme of pale yellow for the body of the buildings with white trim and accents. The proposal also involves a variance request from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the front building setback from the required 25' to 20'. COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Guest Cottage Requirements: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.3(Q), a guest cottage can be used only for members of the family occupying the principal dwelling, their nonpaying guests, or persons employed for service on the premises. The structure shall not occupy more than 1/20tt' fop the lot area and in no case exceed a floor area of 700 sq. ft. Further, the structure shall be located to observe the setback requirements as imposed for the principal structure. A guest cottage may be affixed to an accessory structure. The proposed guest cottage, which is located on the second floor of the garage, meets the required setbacks, however, it does exceed 1/20 of the lot (497.25 sq. ft.) as proposed. Based upon the lot size, the square footage of the guest cottage must be reduced by 18.75 sq. ft. in order to meet this requirement. This has been added as a condition of approval. 136 NE 151 Avenue Old School Square Historic District Page 3 Landscaping Requirements for Duplex Residential Development: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(2)(a-f): (a) One (1) tree shall be planted for every 2,000 square feet of lot area or fraction thereof. Existing trees preserved on the site may be credited toward this tree requirement. (b) In addition, in consideration of the fact that some duplex units have back-out parking, and no direct screening can be achieved between the parking and street area, hedging and a shade tree will be required to be installed on both sides of the back-out parking area. (c) A strip of land a minimum of five (5) feet in width shall be provided around the foundation of the building where it faces the right-of-way and along the side of the building that provides entry for the units and shall be landscaped with shrubs and ground covers. All other lot areas not covered by buildings or paving will be landscaped with sod, shrubs or ground covers. (d) In addition the area between the property line and the edge of pavement of the abutting right-of-way shall be provided with sod, irrigation and maintenance. (e) All air-conditioning units and other mechanical equipment and refuse areas will be screened with shrubbery or fencing. (f) For duplexes that have a parking lot that does not require back-out parking, the screening specified for new multi-family units provided below shall be required. The open space requirement for OSSHAD zoning is 25%. No landscaping has been proposed with this project. The proposed open space consists of 38.5% of the site which meets the requirements for the OSSHAD zoning district. However, as the proposed dwelling is a duplex, the project must be consistent with LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(2)(a-f) prior to submittal of the building permit, which has been attached as a condition of approval. Right-of-Way Dedication: Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), and the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the required right-of-way width for NE 1st Avenue is 60. Currently 40' of right-of-way exists for NE 1st Avenue. The Development Services Management Group (DSMG) and the City Engineer approved a right-of-way reduction for NE 1st Avenue to 50'. Accordingly, five feet (5') of additional right-of-way must be dedicated by the property owner in conjunction with this project and the right-of-way deed accepted by the City Commission. Notation of the right-of-way dedication must also be provided on the site plan. These have been attached as conditions of approval. 136 NE 1st Avenue Old School Square Historic District Page 4 Duplex Parking Requirements: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(b), two parking spaces are required per dwelling unit for duplexes. Tandem parking may be used provided that such parking does not result in the space for one unit impeding access to a space of the other unit. Further, curb cuts or direct access from parking areas onto a street shall not exceed 24'in width. The project includes provision of parking for both units. Two spaces have been provided adjacent to the garage for one unit while two tandem spaces are proposed adjacent to the building on the north side of the property for the second unit. The spaces, as provided, meet the intent of the parking requirement. Swimming Pool Yard Encroachment: Per LDR Section 4.6.15 (G)(1), swimming pools, the tops of which are no higher than grade level, may extend into the rear or side setback area but no closer than ten feet (10) to any property line. The proposed pool is set back seven and a half feet (7.5') from the side (south) setback, which also complies with the 7.5' side interior building setback requirement , and 13.5' from the rear(west) property line, where 10' is required. Thus, the proposal complies with the pool setback requirements. Setback Requirements: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the applicable development standards for the OSSHAD zoning district that relates to the proposal are as follows: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 29' Building Setbacks (min.) - Front (north) 25' 20'** Side Interior (north) 7.5' 21' Side Interior(south) 7.5 7.5' Rear (west) 10' 42' Accessory Structure Rear Setback 10' 13.5' Open Space 25% 38.5% ** A variance request to reduce the front building setback from 25' to 20' is associated with this proposal. An analysis of the request follows: , 136 NE 1st Avenue Old School Square Historic District • Page 5 VARIANCE ANALYSIS Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(J), in addition to the required findings of LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5) (copy attached), the Board may also be guided by the following as an alternative to the above criteria: (1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare; (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenances, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places; (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site; and, (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of a historic site or a historic district. (2) Or, as an alternative to Sub-Section (J)(1), that a variance is necessary to accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of a structure within a Historic District or upon a Historic Site through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare; (b) The variance would not significantly diminish the historic character of the Historic District or Site;and, (c) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to effect the adaptive reuse of an existing structure or site. (3) The Board shall otherwise follow procedures and impose conditions as required of the Board of Adjustments. The development proposal includes a request for a variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K), as it pertains to the front building setback requirement. The variance justification statement as supplied by the applicant is as follows: It has come to our attention that the City of Delray Beach is proposing to annex 5 feet of our property for sidewalk placement. We vehemently oppose the loss of this property as you propose. We mildly support an easement for sidewalk placement but do not want to lose property or have any changes to the current building setbacks. We currently have drawings • 136 NE 1st Avenue ' r Old School Square Historic District Page 6 in progress for this property and the loss of 5 feet would dramatically alter our plans. Analysis: As previously noted, granting the requested variance would reduce the front building setback requirement from 25' to 20'. The variance is requested for a vacant lot, which exceeds minimum requirements, after the right-of-way dedication. The development pattern along NE 1st Avenue varies from lot to lot, however the majority of the existing structures comply with the 25' setback requirement, after the five foot (5') dedication. It is noted the garage and pool are set back 13.5' from the west property line. As the minimum building and pool setback is 10', every feature indicated on the site plan can be shifted three feet (3.5') to the west. As there is inadequate space to utilize the driveway for parking (18' required with only 13.5' provided) and given the extensive driveway with access to NE 1st Avenue, a 10' setback will not impact the ability of residents and guests to park on site. With respect to the remaining two feet (2'), the floor plan could be modified to the front and rear if the structure or the Board can find that the variance is intended to accommodate the eight foot (8') wide wrap-around porch, which adds to the historic character of the area. It is noted that the approved site plan for the proposed Management Systems property (presently known as Ascot), located at the southwest corner of NE 2nd Street and NE 1st Avenue, was approved by the HPB for the reduction of the side street setback from 15' to 10' on NE 1st Avenue. The variance was granted due to the lot size (6,809 sq. ft.) and configuration. ANALYSIS; Design Elements LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non-contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if . 136 NE 1st Avenue Old School Square Historic District Page 7 any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) height, (b) front façade proportion, (c) proportion of openings (windows and doors), (d) rhythm of solids to voids: front facades, (e) rhythm of buildings on streets, (t) rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections, (g) consistency in relation to materials, texture, color, (h) roof shapes, (i) walls of continuity, (I) scale of a building, and (k) directional expression of a front elevation. The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that: (a) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (b) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Conclusion The proposed new, two-story duplex reflects a traditional Florida style of architecture with its wrap-around porch, exterior clapboard siding, metal roof, and single hung sash windows. While the new construction is appropriate in style, scale, and massing to the adjacent historic buildings, the proposed design elements do not significantly differentiate themselves from the adjacent historic buildings. It is therefore recommended that the proposed clapboard exterior be varied with smooth stucco on one of the proposed floors. The introduction of a modern material such as a smooth stucco finish has been added as a condition of approval. In addition, no detail of the windows or exterior lighting details have been submitted and no shutter dogs are proposed for the decorative shutters. Submittal of a window detail, including a muntin profile, exterior lighting detail and notation of location on the elevations, and notation for shutter dogs on the elevations have been added as conditions of approval. As the applicant has only preliminarily chosen a color scheme for the property, formal submittal of a specific color scheme is also added as a condition of approval. 136 NE 1st Avenue • Old School Square Historic District Page 8 Further, no notation of the materials for the pool deck, driveway, or the sidewalk has been noted on the site plan. Also, no detail of the proposed wall or fence has been. provided. These have been added as conditions of approval. Based on the analysis above, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.3.3(P)(4)(b), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), 4.6.9(C)(2)(b), 4.6.15(G), 4.6.16(H)(2)(a-f), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, once the conditions of approval have been met. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate if Appropriateness and associated variance for 136 NE 1st Avenue, Ferrara Duplex, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.3.3(P)(4)(b), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), 4.6.9(C)(2)(b), 4.6.15(G), 4.6.16(H)(2)(a-f), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated variance for 136 NE 1st Avenue, Ferrara Duplex, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.3.3(P)(4)(b), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), 4.6.9(C)(2)(b), 4.6.15(G), 4.6.16(H)(2)(a-f), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Variance Request: Board's Discretion. 0 Certificate\Appropriateness: j. 67 Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for 136 NE 1st Avenue, Ferrara Duplex, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.3.3(P)(4)(b), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), 4.6.9(C)(2)(b), 4.6.15(G), 4.6.16(H)(2)(a-f), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: L3` 1) That a five foot (5') right-of-way dedication is noted on the site plan and the deed accepted by the City Commission, prior to issuance of a building permit; 2) That one floor of the exterior displays a smooth stucco finish; • P 136 NE 1st Avenue . Old School Square Historic District Page 9 /3) Submit exterior lighting details and note the locations on the building elevations; 4) That window details including muntin profile be submitted; 5) That decorative wrought iron shutter dogs be installed flanking each decorative shutter; 6) That a color scheme be submitted for the body, trim, and accents with samples; 7) That the guest cottage is reduced in square footage to a maximum of 497.25 sq. ft. and that the cottage is limited to use by members of the family occupying the principal dwelling or their nonpaying guests per LDR Section 4.3.3(Q); 8) That the proposed materials for the driveway, sidewalk, and pool deck are noted on the site plan; 9) That a detail of the proposed wall and fence are submitted; and, 10) That a landscape plan is submitted with the building permit that meets the intent of LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(2)(a-f). Attachments: Proposed Elevations, Site Plan, Survey, &Floor Plan Report Prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner tOLUa 1.V S 11 Il.li 1.0 001 •--- , l ' . , . - \ ... ........1•11rt , • ( 7c_a 7' ___ 7!), 7._-__ i-x3F.TriET. .tIVEFIEK '/ 9_ 1 N 1 a 1 i I d 76.50'j." /, ./i, • , it? L. I. _ ' c jb x . . _ ?-- ,5T 12-.(.(2• 49 SE-T 'it'1.rZ. ..„ 4. SII: z- cS i C- P(t.J5 650,4) kt Co?(LE.451Y-1) . - r el 0 I . . . . - . . tor 11 BLOCK 67 LOT 10 BLOCK 67 LOT 12 BLOCK 67 • , „ . - . - . . 0 0 lei cb VACANT LOT en eel - Pay . ..t....--i ,.. E A .., 4 . . . , .1 k . . .... r . )(_.1--- . .0 ( i`-•.,'::'•-£.,V' 1 • 7 e- -IPA.—°ai qP., 96' 1- oc ..c - Fo-t.31.10 sit,"1,1z. _ . • ' • 1-,./u0O 2- x2"C.H. --1- 011-111u1-15eizsc) 0 - 76.50' _ Cl 0 orNdy113E.XD c-L - I . I7&O0' 41t-- Fo.uw.1.0 P.v. ilk 3 PIO'RIP1) 1 .._.5-- . z - (utiwut-isEr._,s9 Fou,! P.tz.1.14.,L. F;t1.11 P.V.K,.LI • k ,16sdEv_(1.1t41.11.3.Na5see.c.) k. OE s 1.1£Q 4.k.11..id?,,I= " • -- -____;-------_ 1- POST Z = OFFICE U O)p Qi-- — WE L,J • U14.1 U — = Q L.i> in G ¢ QMil IMMMI — 11-- ill i cn SRI) ST. N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. _• • ST. WNM IIIN - r � 3 a a Z I= ME4- = r Mil z = c CITY Q _NI - Ip ATTORNEY MI In� "'. L�; L..., i BUILDING z 0mom vIIN cc ■ 4 .. NI THER KING JR. DRIVE N.W. 2ND ST. N.E. 2ND ST. LW } . �A •.vr C L: ;:l W> w 111. 0 :ji a0] Z J F- Z CITY a0• HALL zO aZMI NW 1ST ST.- N.E. 1ST ST. ` i o 'moo = I- J � COMMUNI TY Z Li Li a z z CENTER z z iU } w 2 vi TENNIS OLD STADIUM SCHOOL I I ,; _L,_ L SQUARE I I z - J T , A T L A N TIC AVENUE > w w , ' SOUTH ¢L I `` a V a COUNTY > w w COURT Q U HOUSE o a_-i O N U' Z M lifil � ~ U - Nin 5 t II Lei UJ in (A N L • �- 136 N.E. 1ST AVENUE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL (FERRARA RESIDENCE) PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM730 • 7 .• 1' t r w 1 41. Y 4. y4A,: J^�f"`f"j"Yy.fi`�.i 4s.,_)tr:r _ . L., ,, � +l �`r. .d, ova e 441044 fa t *ram ‹,=yam - • 120 N.E. 1 Avenue Approx. 88 ft. - A. , ,V ,- ,. ,1*2.? •4 '•-k ' ;,, is ...- 444; ilt,,ilk ., -: ' . .','..6.,.',., •'..NI. '\''• ' ;:-, , ,z• 'Ali, $ii•,.., r : n , ,,,f.!:...7 ' ', \, •; s ,'.,' r: 0\ .e, ,r1.40,11y4,0 e, 0 filOp'^ , "'. ' ' . ', 1', ' \• 'It- (,"‘4- ' "--4,-;:' O ..,'.-•.-,.- - ::. ,'4, ,. ••-- - • "IS-- •- - • .'•". ','1, .." - ' . ,, '•r_,,,,, , ..1 f ." s, T- A --- e. i' ••• ' • \ 41,k' - .‘'. . ' .kli •i ,, ;$••••••k .4,:qifeA• ''.1.i. ,, •,,A 4.4- . "?..`,..-::- ' -. :.' . .;'.'-;:i:'...,;i,',.ih.. • '. '2'4 ' .. .7-f-4'' '' ' ,• ,4.4` 1 ' , —4-.. '4 ' ',' - • . , ' N..'".'r r'.I j'-11".. ',-V.4 4';4 1'14;4' •'.. . ' .....1.,. ' .1110... tit ..11." 0. ' Of>.-, ,..., .. •:,•':',...,0;01!•:01/4:•''',:”,,.9 ,f,,4114,7,1...0. ',,,,,''..i.N-it OI,Ci-rT•-......)"'.i,.:,',c,e›l.'....4 00.•.-.4..`.......1,1.'-1.''.',0---,--<,.;.....-;-.-:; : ; '' • • ,..t,4N"..,;,141.,,-i .,i,•••'1'!it,'4',, ,.; . '...'•'i.0..t-...‘ 4i4 :- I 74 , ,:-,.-.4,4,-,,,,..,.,,,,,,,,',,,..!,,,i,)-,-,•4.;,,,•i,, ',.,,,,,,.e'",.'...z..•,41 4,,,-,-.,' :*.."....,...,....'..,,,"• 4' .,.• .Wl‘ - ,,•••• ' - ' , • - vor •'11;,•....:- i , _ •#' 1....,-'4. — 0.-sor.A.,.• (0", ' ' I '=-''t,1,1.- --' --__=---. .:, • lie. • • 93 d' ' -. /4. A ) /AA I, F.... . 'illi•,1) /-_-31 b..4 ., -- ... k.1.',...• ' /7 ' ,..,A'. .., t ' -- ••• .•`..‘''. ' -k '.• '',1 '''1 ' '. .'. '. 'it-t-Th':.1 ''!'' le I ' - • •- , •,...• _ ., -- • , •-• * ' A-21.:4."1-`i,.-`,,...' ' , - ••,i .,,, „_ ...,,in.....' ". .r,i' te'',;',..t..'• ' ,• ' . ..... '6.'4' . ' 1...............„ ........- '.. "Arr',:ii. .., .;:::;_jr:4,-- ' • "c,..!. ., - ...': ,...... 138 N.E. 1 Avenue Approx 52 ft. / .4' �; a \ < 4 : < G! j \ x (V,\11,,,:,:'.: "",7.1.0..1'7,4*, ,ir \ i- ..• . . • . ' ' ' \‘'," .:,-.,-•-,-. _ , • ..z7,7,-,,••-••••••-.,.--,,,-.,,••,.:7• , • .-. :,„..• • 77,4 - l II ♦ tii. f i �t .', ,.@3 'tts1.1•', [ Yip _ "� 4 •...,",,,,;,• iii,.,,,,,.H:•, 1:_l,,;',., i i . 0",, :II". ; .-',,,.;,-?,v,; 111r1,‘" -.# — , . . • ,„1„ qp a _ _ . py S 'ram + _ •.,-,:::'I_M.. ....-M.._ O' i 4 Y i� e 't, rSFM. y �s 1."." ;'w'Frr'''4.. ,.'.--.:4'..‘..).,-' ..',---':.:`..,,A'V.'-,,,-, .:::,,,4,. &..- 4.• .... 134 N.E. 1 Avenue Approx. 37 ft. ''., •,,, , i . • ti - , . , . '''''' ,:',"-• , ! - . 4/'.'''. 1 '' ,''.i." . '4...AO'','':1•7.-.,''!...AC:1 y, •,,..:.P..'.,1;./ 't- ' • t:', ' , 4k.‘i.,.,-,.-„1.,-,:(p',•ic\.;,.,/,,,,',..-'..,,,;,,''-,,f;1'tl.Lli;,'i'i f;t.4,.iA,4yi6,','Irt'',*4'4 t s. ..$r- 14,e,'4,1..:.:V,'3,.6. 4A: niY--T3'-r4:';;I:V-. ----• ., , e '' ▪ '•1.'.•A e• '''...,'1',.('i,f,4t.'!•'•"i fi$'/l1-';-lf 1i'0,",,,t',i i•' -.)l:eL'I‘.''i:t.''.A',','',.,,0'•1"4.1.-"14.'4-2, : -r., T. ''.''' ' ' ^it7,t•''' '4,, ' i ,ij ' ', ii,li , ,- lik• ..- ..,' • k'• N',"" -•''''ssiS- 19! . ''t 1,. j'll , il 1 I I, 11 111 ' „ •• .6'4"'i I.! III ,,• '1 ',' ' --,'--1 154-."" k '''' ••:.4._'' I . • . - ' t - -• • sir-zto =.,•:,:::..'"-:',..":"` , -;"4 - , 4. , .tt,. ''''-„,,,: , -1--;-,, -,...--_-_,----- •,--** , ..,, , ....,C,4,,- . 3' 3..•,- N.4. , t,V,,1%;; ,.• '''' -:. 7",;,...r." /M.. • - 4 .. . • ' f, . :'' ;" ,,- '44*;'''' 21.-..'''' - ' ' '. k 1 .- ' ' • 4tit4''' " ..,443/14 4404 ..,, 122 N.E 1 Avenue Approx. 27 ft • AA •• }' \ y . ..., : ...'i, I • ',i" - . `"-''. .4.' akt-A .`or ... AIM» r r 4. ill � K , • ,I®► c {, f, ` A , vrflo ; . , , IA . ,,-, .. .. , V ill. '''' . __ ,K.'Itt: . '1 ' . 1-'11 . ''''(''':\'''.1'''''"'''':' '41''. : ' 4v,...,,,,,.,,,, ,.,.. I ' ' -,,t. i r 0,..„, !III i, ink. 0 1.,,,,III , . • _Y ;n _. L • RFD +�". _ -_._ r F. r°}Nw,,c9y,•taAM1�. r . -'''46 n.ry�.4 _ t ` i �"`. -� s�.� r •, • ,� ,' • yam{. .y rt } ..—�._. e F ' % ' » •n`y'ID; ,'1.- .;`!... ! .. - .. _ Sri' 238 N.E. 1 Avenue Approx. 23 ft xiy„i1- 1r ,i' :.-.�� ; 11(10, ' ,i . 4 . 41 4. ` ,'{� is nl• .� ,A�t .I \ � : .� , 'Al _� "ti v r �'.� �aa q, _.. .. i ,� „ �� . va ,, y 1 � tv 123 " ' d r - u i 1 1 i Is It 1 I' r ti ._, _ • \ ,. • .r t 123 N.E. 1 Avenue Approx. 18 ft. i 57, ., '- • e " , •., ' , ;" • D.7 4 . ' 4 4•4,, ,,,' , ," r -,._--....„ ....,,, _74-- , '1111-: - i 7 4.Nosierilism Ammastvims,-Inv •• •. . 1 A . ^ ,• - - . Ao• - •* . ''- *RP 41/4 • It ,'-4.,"V.,-,:,1-7,74,11.4.• '••-•*1,.....,- .. ,S 10% - I lk . •,...,-...7.,--.1" ''',....,,, ‘,..-• i ,, . -. ,-/•7='' ' 11;` ,,,- : —iessimmoka*". - lk 1 234 . A.4 ......,, i t 1 . ' iirtz. , t, ,-- .. ... ., . - -•059111 --.4111111111111 in•,:- I ,- ,.-z.-- --,- e,r44-11----------- ,. - ik ,.. 234 N.E. 1 Avenue Approx. 15 ft. f ' 'o Planning & Zoning Department �( r P MEMORANDUM �P,4r 3 TO: HPB MEMBERS FROM: WENDY SHAY, HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER DATE: APRIL 7, 2004 RE: 2004 HPB AWARD BALLOT The following is the formal ballot for the 2004 HPB Awards. Please vote by marking one project in each category and return these ballots at the next meeting on April 21 , 2004. The awards ceremony will take place at the regular City Commission meeting on May 4, 2004. All Board members are encouraged to attend. Conversions House of Vintage at` - `�°� 123 South Swinton Avenue Ems \0,- Old School Square Historic District Use: Retail it Ilglllll11111111111 aiiiiii O4f The Vintage Rose ' 102 NE 1st Avenue (northwest corner of NE 1st Avenue and NE .. 1st Street) Old School Square Historic District ;_., - Y' 1.. .� ,. Use: Retail •r ti Jagger's Universe 74 '4,' ,,_ - :A--ti 275 North Swinton Avenue (southeast corner of North Swinton "" - ' L Avenue and NE 3rd Street) I---7--- ---- Old School Square Historic District Use: Retail 1 Rehabilitation t S. '- S.E. O'Neal House a:' ' 910 NE 2nd Avenue ---------- - ,s Individually Listed Historic Property oh ear - �K r� . Use: Residential McKeever/Fischer Residence I 255 North Swinton Avenue r G ; y,.. , Old School Square Historic District 4'-.- - - Use: Residential Signage 4 ., if , Dagger's Universe - ,z. • r. , 275 North Swinton Avenue (southeast corner of North Swinton t' ' :, f/JAGGEN51 . : Avenue and NE 3rd Street) Old School Square Historic District ._ 4 Camilucci Signs .., i,•. , -Y � .' r" ..11K. .,1 0 S&R Beauty Supply ' 103 NW 5th Avenue � ; West Settlers Historic District Bright Image Signs f i I Bull Bar T,':0,1011 2 East Atlantic Avenue Old School Square Historic District ,. Garat Oates, Owner 2 a, �, a�; e 71, !?T; -"t The Vintae Rose d r, . ; i �''4,, t • 102 NE 1stAvenue ° `- Old School Square Historic District >;��i q ' _, Sign-O-Rama -4 < - . .., Pat Cayce Preservation Award , I' Ms. Alyce Beck f I: r I tJ Tower Apartments 401 NE 2nd Avenue (northeast corner of NE 2nd Avenue and 0 -- NE 4th Street) Del-Ida Park Historic District - Use: Multi-Family ,ig,e *i'. - '1"` Mr. Gary Eliopoulos ^; 3' The Amelung House i' r: ,,, ' T;st.5"'- . " 102 NE 12th Street Individually Listed Historic Property Use: Residential cc: Paul Darling, Director of Planning and Zoning Jeff Costello, Assistant Director of Planning and Zoning 3 DELL O k DRAY BEACH F A biking All-America City 111111 ,0 1993 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting April 7, 2004 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION -_-, , 0__ l6-1(4 ;)1,_ pozi4,e Jz-05 4,:?_,a(rea , ; , , me, _6(yAir-rcif « tc A � ' cb2 \NUN r�cRcr� 0/2r�� r/ � ��%y Cah, h-,