Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
HPB- 04-16-03
AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: April 16, 2003 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners maybe in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • March 12, 2003 • March 19, 2003 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Kemish Office Building, 131 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Roger Cope, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class V Site Plan and waiver requests for the conversion of a single family home to an office. B. S&R Beauty Supplies, 103 NW 5th Avenue, West Settler's Historic District, Bright Image Signs, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing sign. C. The Parsonage, 36 NW 4th Avenue, West Settler's Historic District, Delray Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a contributing building. IV. BOARD ACTIONS A. Consider the elimination of the City of Delray Beach Suggested HPB Exterior Color Chart. April 16, 2003 HPB Meeting Page 2 B. Recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board regarding an amendment to LDR Section 4.5.1(M) for the Tax Exemptions for Historic Properties V. DISCUSSION ITEM A. Review by the City Attorney's Office of Historic Preservation Board authority over actions pertaining to demolition requests. B. Review of the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Draft VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff VII. ADJOURN crI A I i _ I LR LI Wendy Shay, Hto'ric Prese ation Planner POSTED ON: April 11, 2003 ``,�.� cA AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING (4b �4P CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: April 2, 2003 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199 (TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. The APRIL 2, 2003 Historic Preservation Board's Regular Meeting has been CANCELED. The next Regular Meeting of the Historic Preservation Board is April 16, 2003. \ f tActA.,K Wendy Shay Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON March 26, 2003 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: April 16, 2003 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:05 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gloria Elliott, Rhonda Sexton, Jim Keavney, Bill Branning, Francisco Perez-Azua. MEMBERS ABSENT: Gail Lee McDermott STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Loretta Heussi, Jeff Costello. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes for the Regular Meetings of March 12, 2003 were before the Board for consideration. Ms. Sexton moved to approve the minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Branning and passed 6-0. The Minutes for the Regular Meetings of March 19, 2003 were before the Board for consideration. Mr. Branning moved to approve the minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Keavney and passed 6-0. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS Ms. Jamison, Chairperson, read the Quasi-Judicial Rules into record and swore in all those wishing to speak. A. Kemish Office Building, 131 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Roger Cope, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: Consideration of a COA and an associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements with waiver requests and an internal adjustment for the conversion of a single family home to office for the property at 131 North Swinton Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. Ms. Shay entered the project file and a copy of her resume into record and presented the item to the Board. Roger Cope was present to represent the project. Mr. Cope requested that the proposed cupola be retained and that the sidewalk proposed by staff be eliminated though he felt that installation of the sidewalk would be positive with respect to pedestrian safety. Ms. Sexton requested that the proposed flag atop the cupola be replaced with a weather vane. She further requested clarification of the existing and proposed windows. Mr. Cope stated that some windows are existing and were replaced before the current owners purchased the building. Mr. Cope will note the current configurations on the revised plans. Ms. Elliott supported the installation of a walkway between the sidewalk and building. The Board collectively supported the retention of the cupola and did not require the installation of a walkway connected to the city's sidewalk. Ms. Shay explained the reasoning for relocating the proposed bike rack. She further stated that there are few alternative locations on the site. Waiver Request After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Mr. Branning and passed 6-0 to approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), to reduce the landscape strip from the required 5' to 2'6", based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B). Internal Adjustment It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Mr. Branning and passed 6-0 to approve the internal adjustment to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(4)(d), to reduce the one-way drive aisle along the north property line from the required 12' width to 11', based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(C), subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed landscape island adjacent to the rear entrance be reduced in length by 3', excluding the curbing, -2- HPB Minutes 4/16/03 • and any proposed landscape canopy within the island clear the gable roof and oncoming traffic when at full height. Site Plan It was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 6-0 to approve the COA for the Class V Site Plan for the office at 131 North Swinton Avenue, Kemish Office, based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report with the exception of the required walkway from the city's sidewalk to the building. 2) That the length of the landscape island adjacent to the rear entrance be reduced by three (3) feet to accommodate an adequate turning radius. Landscape Plan It was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Mr. Perez and passed 6-0 to approve the COA for the Landscape Plan for 131 North Swinton Avenue, Kemish Office, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following condition: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical • items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. Design Elements It was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 6-0 to approve the COA and associated design elements for the development at 131 North Swinton Avenue, Kemish Office, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8), subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed flag pole be eliminated and replaced with a weathervane. B. S&R Beauty Supplies, 103 NW 5th Avenue, West Settler's Historic District, Bright Image Signs, Authorized Agent. -3- • HPB Minutes 4/16/03 Action Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing, monument sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and a copy of her resume and presented the item to the Board. Jay Little, Bright Image Signs, and Rutha Stubbs, owner, were present to represent the project. Overall, the Board expressed their concerns with the proposed location and type of sign though they supported the design. The Board recommended the use of a wall, projecting, or pole mounted sign and to return to the Board with the new sign. Ms. Sexton supported the retention of the sign as proposed though she encouraged the use of landscaping to "soften" the look of the sign. Mr. Little and Mrs. Stubbs explained in detail their need for an illuminated free-standing sign. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Mr. Branning and failed 1-5 (Ms. Sexton voted in favor) to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), - and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. The Parsonage, 36 NW 4th Avenue, West Settler's Historic District, Delray Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, Owner. Action Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a contributing single family home in the West Settler's Historic District, pursuant to LDR Sections 2.4.6(J) and 4.5.1(F). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. -4- HPB Minutes 4/16/03 Ms. Shay entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. Based upon visual inspection and support by the West Settler's Advisory Board and a general consensus of the community, it was agreed that the building should be demolished rather than relocated. Thuy Shutt was present from the CRA to represent the project. Ms. Shutt reiterated that the community supported disbursement of funding for rehabilitation of all the contributing historic resources in the West Settler's Historic District rather than the use of all the funds for the relocation and rehabilitation of the Parsonage. The building has been documented for future research. It was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Mr. Keavney and passed 6-0 to approve COA 413 (Continuation)for the demolition of the contributing dwelling, the Parsonage, 36 NW 4th Avenue. IV. BOARD ACTIONS A. Action by the Board: Consideration of the elimination of the City of Delray Beach Suggested HPB Exterior Color Chart. Ms. Shay stated that there is no historical or architectural basis for the development of the color chart established in c.1988. As choosing a color scheme is an aesthetic issue and as paint is a reversible treatment, the existing color chart should be eliminated. It was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. Sexton, and passed 6-0 to approve the elimination of the City of Delray Beach Suggested HPB Exterior Color Chart, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. • B. Action by the Board: Recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board regarding an amendment to LDR Section 4.5.1(M) for the Tax Exemption for Historic Properties. Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board. State regulations regarding the processing of tax abatements for historic properties was expanded and revised in 2000. With this request, the City's Land Development Regulations would be revised to reflect these changes including processing projects before, during, or after the initiation of construction, further defining qualifying improvements, -5- HPB Minutes 4/16/03 specifying the responsibilities of the Board and staff, and placing a time limit for applicants to submit the application for the exemption. John Bennett reviewed the proposed revisions and noted several typos and requested clarification of several statements. Ms. Shay will address them and clarify any outstanding issues. It was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Mr. Keavney, and passed 6-0 to recommend to the Planning & Zoning Board approval of the amendment to LDR Section 4.5.1(M) for the Tax Exemption for Historic Properties, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.5(M), with the condition that staff review the comments by John Bennett and revise accordingly. V. DISCUSSION ITEM A. Review by the City Attorney's Office of Historic Preservation Board authority over actions pertaining to demolition requests. Brain Shutt, Asst. City Attorney, was present to clarify how demolition requests, as stated in Ordinance 13-87, are interpreted. Alieda Riley, resident of the Marina Historic District, inquired about how long an applicant has to begin the project once the permit is pulled. Mr. Costello and Mr. Branning stated that they have six months. Mrs. Riley inquired about whether a permit extension can be requested. Mr. Perez stated that it was a decision for the Chief Building Official. Staff will continue researching alternate options addressing demolition by neglect, extension to a nine month stay of demolition, and requiring that demolition permits be submitted in conjunction with construction permits. B. Review of the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Draft Ms. Shay provided copies of sections from the Florida SHPO Design Guidelines to aid in the Board's review of the initial draft proposed by Ellen Uguccioni, Janus Research Consultant. -6- HPB Minutes 4/16/03 The Board felt that the guidelines needed to be more user-friendly and provide more pragmatic advice for historic property owners. Ms. Shay will convey the information to the consultant and she requested that the Board be open in conveying their concerns to the consultant during the next draft review. VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: None B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: Mr. Keavney presented an affordable, aluminum frame window by Ogren to the Board that many be an alternative when windows need to be replaced as the detailed muntin and mullion profiles are similar to that of wood. Ms. Jamison inquired about the duplexes on Palm Court. Mr. Costello stated that the applicant will be requesting site plan approval in the coming weeks. D. Staff: Ms. Shay requested that a representative from the Board be named to attend the Cultural Loop Meetings. Ms. Jamison was named as a contact. Ms. Shay presented photos of the windows with new muntins at 1109 Sea Spray Avenue. Ms. Shay requested that the Board consider the Chevy Chase area as a potential historic district. Mr. Costello also recommended that the Dell Park area be considered. A special meeting is scheduled for design guidelines review on April 30, 2003. -7- HPB Minutes 4/16/03 VII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for June 16, 2003, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on August 20, 2003. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -8- HPB Minutes 4/16/03 SIGN Ili ' IIIP. 1993 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting of APRIL 16, 2003 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ORGANIZATION ITEM r (2:(661(- (1SP 6; L,4 iiiiikOlitT,;,\"ki A- Li " Lu= G ..4r 7a.�v4GE - { G2� i'6/74(( /43 A-4) 0.5'(- .4", ).‘ttr./ / ;14-Mz4,(71-72-- \/1.ki`) Cd-ir A-W(rN �i l MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC H E A R I N G MEETING DATE: March 12, 2003 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott, Rhonda Sexton, Jim Keavney, William Branning, and Francisco Perez-Azua (arrived 6:07). MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay II. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Ms. Jamison read into record the quasi-judicial hearing regulations and swore in all those wishing to speak. A. Saraga & Lipshy, P.A., 201 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Mike Sneiderman, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated waiver for a Class I site plan modification for the installation of a free-standing sign for Saraga & Lipshy, P.A., pursuant to LDR Sections 2.4.6(J) and 2.4.7(B). Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication. As no one declared such communication, Ms. Shay entered the project file and a copy of her resume into record and presented the proposed project. The applicant requested the installation of a free standing and a wall mounted sign in 2001. The Board reviewed the request and recommended that the applicant submit a request for two free- standing signs; one on NE 2na Street, the other on NE 1st Avenue, which would require the submission of a waiver. The applicant is now before the Board to do so. The installation of two signs will not interfere with site visibility and the sign's design is complimentary to the surrounding architecture. Mr. Sneiderman was present to represent the project on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Sneiderman re-iterated that a second free standing sign was directed by the Board and that the applicant preferred the wall mounted sign. Mr. Perez expressed his concern over allowing more than one free standing sign on the property by granting the waiver. Mr. Branning confirmed with staff that the applicant is permitted more than one sign. Ms. Shay concurred that more than one type of sign is permitted. Ms. Jamison agreed with Mr. Perez that too many signs are being installed as conversions of single family homes occur. Ms. Shay stated that this is unique to the Old School Square historic district in that corner lots outside of the district are permitted one sign per frontage. She also re-iterated that this was a board directive and not the original wishes of the applicant. Waiver Request After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-2 (Perez, Jamison dissenting) to recommend to the City Commission approval of the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) to permit more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs on one parcel pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5) for the property at 201 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga & Lipshy, P.A. Certificate of Appropriateness After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign for 201 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga & Lipshy, P.A., based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. B. Levin Residence, 319 SE 7th Avenue, Marina District, Jeffrey Colestock, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for elevation changes to a non- -2- HPB Minutes 3/12/03 contributing property at 319 SE 7th Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the proposed project. In August 2001, the Board reviewed a COA request to construct a 7,232 sq. ft. two-story dwelling and demolition of the non-contributing dwelling. The Board directed that the elevations be altered to reflect a more distinct architectural style. After direction by the Board regarding the elevations, the applicant re-submitted the request and the Board approved the modified elevations. The applicant is now before the Board for review and approval of additional elevation changes and a reduction of the proposed square footage from 7,323 sq. ft. to 6,907 in addition to some additional exterior modifications. Staff requested that the applicant submit a lighting detail and paint samples as conditions of approval. Mr. Colestock was present to represent the project. Mr. Colestock presented a lighting detail and stated.that paint samples will be coordinated with the interior and will therefore be submitted at a later date. Mr. Branning asked for details about the balcony railings. Mr. Colestock provided clarification. Ms. McDermott questioned the use of a stone fence in Delray. Mr. Colestock stated that it will resemble sandstone. Ms. Shay stated that the stone compliments the surrounding architecture and landscaping. Ms. McDermott also inquired about the shutters. Mr. Colestock stated that they are decorative and will have shutter dogs. Ms. Sexton questioned the use of the two-story window and its location on the south end of the building. Mr. Perez stated that the large windows are not appropriate for the style. Mr. Keavney concurred. Ms. Elliott expressed concern over the high style displayed in the front of the house and the minimal design of the rear (Intracoastal side) including the change of windows and lack of shutters. Mr. Perez felt that the two-story windows should be separated to create a transom at the top to bring the windows into proportion with the building. -3- HPB Minutes 3/12/03 After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 7-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for 319 SE 7th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8) (a-c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to the following condition: 1) That the applicant submit paint samples and a lighting detail. 2) That the windows and doors around the great hall be divided with a beam approximately 8'-1 0' high at the discretion of the architect. Ill. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: None B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: Mr. Perez expressed his concern over the design guidelines, particularly with respect to the "New Construction" section. Issues such as scale and massing are a concern and should be the focus of the design guidelines update. It was agreed that the Board would meet without the consultant to review and edit the section on April 2, 2003, prior to the next special meeting. Ms. Jamison questioned the current setbacks of projects and suggested that they may not be appropriate. Ms. Shay stated that it was a zoning issue. Ms. Elliott presented a new design for decorative wood shutters with copper caps and a brochure with decorative shutter dogs which state that they meet the current Florida Building Code. D. Staff: None IV. ADJOURNMENT -4- HPB Minutes 3/12/03 There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:25 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for March 12, 2003, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on April 16, 2003. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -5- HPB Minutes 3/12/03 • DELRAYBEACH DELRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD �II ' 1, MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT 1993 1993 201H 2001 Agent: Bright Image Signs Project Name: S&R Beauty Supplies Project Location: 103 NW 5th Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing, monument sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of the west 51' of Lot 8, Block 27 and is zoned GC (General Commercial). Located at the northeast corner of NW 5th Avenue and NW 1st Street, the property contains a one-story 1,330 sq. ft., non-contributing commercial building within the West Settler's Historic District. Built in 1952 as a restaurant, the building was designed by Samuel Ogren, Jr. An addition was constructed in 1962. Presently, the building possesses minimal architectural merit with the exception of recent additions of the portico and decorative cornices along the building's facade. During its meeting of July 18, 2001, the applicant requested a site plan modification to construct a 165 sq. ft. addition at the northeast corner of the building and associated elevation changes that included the construction of a portico with engaged columns at the front (east) entrance and decorative cornices. The addition and elevation changes were approved. The elevation changes were completed, however the addition was never constructed. The applicant is now before the Board for the installation of a free-standing, monument sign. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of the installation of a double-sided, free-standing, monument sign. The proposed sign will be constructed of sintra with a stucco exterior frame and plexiglas for the sign's text. The sign's frame will be painted gold including the banding at the top which will mimic the decorative cornices on the building. The text will be black in all caps on a white Plexiglas background which will be highlighted with backlighting. • S&R Beauty Supplies 2003-175-COA 103 NW 5th Avenue The text will read "S&R Beauty Supplies" with S&R in a text box. The proposed sign measures 36" (3'0") in height and 48" (4'0") in width totaling 12 sq. ft and will be set back approximately 2' east of the ultimate right-if-way line for NW 5th Avenue, perpendicular to the building. REVIEW BY OTHERS During its meeting of March 21, 2003, the Delray Beach Sign Review Committee recommended that the proposed sign display a softer appearance with a cream colored Lexan face and lighter colored copy to replace the black text such as a "day/night" face that provides a bronze or dark gray colored copy during the day and an illuminated gray, bronze, or off-white copy in the evening. On April 9 2003, the West Atlantic Redevelopment Committee (WARC) review and approved the sign as presented. ANALYSIS The Board shall consider: SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(1)(b) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Free-standing signs" A free-standing sign is not affixed to any other structure. It may be either a pole sign or a monument sign. Neither the pole nor the base of the monument shall be considered in calculation of the area of the sign face. A free-standing sign may not have more than two faces. LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and states: The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7). LDR Section 4.6.7 (H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the a following aesthetic conditions must be met. Meeting Date:April 16,2003 Agenda Item: III.B. S&R Beauty Supplies 2003-175-COA 103 NW 5m Avenue Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (G) with respect to height and area. Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building facade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interrupt the views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the established architecture. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts, however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining" and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. One such standard states: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Conclusion The proposed signage conveys the identity and location of the establishment. While the Delray Beach Sign Review Committee recommended that the plexiglas be tinted and Meeting Date:April 16,2003 Agenda Item: III.B. S&R Beauty Supplies 2003-175-COA 103 NW 5th Avenue the font be muted for a more pleasing and subtle visual effect, the design, dimensions, and color palette are appropriate in relation to the style, scale, massing, and design in the area as well as its relation to the surrounding commercial signage such as the backlit, black font (changeable copy) and white plexiglas monument signs found at the S.D. Spady Museum and St. Paul's Church to the north. The proposed overall sign height will be 36" (3'0) with an area of approximately 12 sq. ft for the sign body which will not interfere with the line of sight of the building's façade and will meet the free- standing sign requirements pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(d), which stated that a sign may be placed within the front yard setback (2' setback) if it is not greater than 7' in height and, if located with in the setback, that the sign body measures less than 20 sq. ftBased on this analysis, positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7, the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards can be made. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA for the installation of a free-standing, monument sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies. C. Deny the COA for the installation of a free-standing, monument sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies, with the basis stated. RECOMMENDATION Certificate of Appropriateness Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Attachments:Survey, Sign Detail Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner Meeting Date:April 16,2003 Agenda Item: III.B. N �Wm _ 20.0' • y4+ LOT 7 Qiz — _ - BLOCK 27 1 & 2 STORY BUILDING V�) 1 _ 9.9' e si II 77777,4 CO 41 C6 WM L�� + Q s \ B4.60' �� } 51 oA }+20.53� �y FOUND AI- IRON 1 ;h ...4.6L_ 0 5 0.6' ROD W TH CAP 2m macro �� /LB 353 • i�' gas WIN 90`' DESCRIPTION.: 0-- PA V E D CHAIN LINK FENCE THE WEST 51.0 FEET OF LOT 8, BLOCK 27, o LOT 8 N TOWN OF L/NTON (NOW DELRAY BEACH), 1Z �<) BLOCK 27 I. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS N RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 3 (SHEET W W , , 12.1' y a CO 2), OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM U /i.,.a25.3'�..�ii o O BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. r m: Cl)� �v h 1 a o f FLOOR �/ e �n N +19.61 i., ,,' N �O NOTE: ELEVATIONS SHOWN WERE TAKEN 6/11/98 (J v 12.9'-' J ii L... U3 �. 1 STORY ! FENCE m 1 „.----; BUILDING o' ON LINE c ; CONC PAD o�- N% MAP OF J S/�� 9p� FOR PUBLIC � ' r. 6 , i� PHONE L6'; ``FOUND 5 B'IRON • 1 �.2'_4,.� .,7...37«..� L.ai� ROD WITH CAP 2D•D, _ �� /LB 353 BOUNDARY SURVEY ^L♦" 4.FH } B4�60' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I OCUD CROSS 51.0' } AND MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA NUMBER) POLE OVERHEAD BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS N CHAPTER 61G17-6,FLORIDA UTILITY LINES ADMINISTRATIVE CODE,PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027,FLORIDA STATUTES. 1 CONC WALK N • LEGEND: E= CENTERLINE +18.72 _ N.W. 1ST_ STREET +9.s2_ ( CONC = CONCRETE• PAUL D. ENGLE 1 PAVED NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND SURVEYOR AND MAPPER #5708 THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA FH = FIRE HYDRANT LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. BNAIL ENCH MARK: TOP NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICALBASED O O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC. ELEVA�ON WASHER+19.62 DATUM 1929, SOURCE: PALM BEACH COUNTY BENCH MARK LAND SURVEYORS D-31" CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION/LB353 SURVEYOR AND MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: PAUL D.ENGLE FLOOD ZONE: X 2601 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY,DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA 33483 (561)276-4501 732-3279 FAX 276-2390 ' L.P. = LIGHT POLE • DATE OF SURVEY SCALE: 1" = 20' WM = WATER METER JUL Y 9, 2001 FIELD BOOK PAGE NO, ORDER NO, ©COPYRIGHT 1998 O'BRIEN,SUITER&O'BRIEN,INC. D239 74 98-12Od A„ , • DHRAY n,FACH _ DR0AYBEACH i i .HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD �'� It1EMORAD'UM STAFF REPORT I I I Pa 1)03 2001 _ - 2001 1993 Agent: Delray Beach Community Redevelopment Agency Project Name: COA 413-Continuation Greater Mount Olive Parsonage Project Location: 36 NW 4th Avenue . ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a contributing single family home in the West Settler's Historic District, pursuant to LDR Sections 2.4.6 (J) and 4.5.1(F). BACKGROUNDJPROJECTaDESCRIPTI©N The subject property, located on Lot 9 of Block 28, Town of Delray, lies on the west side of NW 4th Avenue approximately 350' north of West Atlantic Avenue. Constructed in c. 1921, the 1000 sq. ft., wood frame dwelling is considered a contributing building within the West Settler's Historic District. The building was originally built to the rear of the Church on Lot 7 Block 28, for use as a parsonage for the Greater Mt. Olive Baptist Church. The building was relocated to its present location in the 1950s when the church was enlarged. During its meeting of June 21, 2000, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a request to demolish the parsonage in order to accommodate a mixed-use development proposal which encompasses both the subject lot as well as the south portion of Block 28 and the block to the east (Atlantic Grove). The subject property is intended to accommodate parking associated with the proposed development. The Board tabled the review of the demolition until the site plan for the new development was approved with the stipulation that a proposal be submitted to relocate and rehabilitate the building at another location within the West Settler's Historic District. Further, as the building sat vacant, the house was required to be secured in order to deter demolition by neglect and vandalism. The Board reviewed and approved the Class V Site Plan for the Atlantic Grove development on August 15, 2001. Since that time, the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) has researched numerous options for the relocation and retention of the parsonage. An architect, general contractor, and engineer were retained to develop structural reports pertaining to the structural stability and architectural integrity of the building. The engineer determined that the structural integrity of the building had been severely compromised due to termite damage and wood rot, water infiltration, unsound floor boards, settlement concerns, and acute exposure to the elements. Meeting Date:April 16,2003 Agenda Item: III.C. A Demolition-36 NW 4th Avenue Page 2 In December 2001, the CRA organized the West Settler's Advisory Board, a community based group developed to aid in the rehabilitation and redevelopment of the redevelopment of the West. Settler's Historic District. The CRA held meetings and workshops with the aid of community leaders, neighboring residents, and property owners to determine the viability of relocation and/or rehabilitation of the building and future rehabilitation and redevelopment in the area. The CRA has recently committed $50,000 annually ($100,000 the first year) for a period of five years towards the rehabilitation of the contributing properties in the West Settler's Historic District. The group concluded that funding available for the rehabilitation efforts and communtiy redevelopment would be best suited as a series of grants to local property owners for the immediate rehabilitation of the remaining contributing properties in the district. The community felt that the expenditures to relocate and rehabilitate the parsonage were too excessive (estimated at $300,000) to fully benefit the community and that the funding would be best suited for distribution throughout the neighborhood. Therefore, the request to demolition the building is now before the Board for consideration. DEMOLITIONTINDINGS LDR Section 4.5.1(F) "Restrictions on Demolitions" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness' for demolition. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill criteria for designation for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. Meeting Date:April 16,2003 Agenda Item: III.C. Demolition-36 NW 4th Avenue Page 3 • .ANALYSIS ... The CRA has provided the following justification for the demolition request: The house has sustained extensive structural damage from termites and water. According to reports from a local architect and general contractor, little of the homes original materials remain. At their meeting of March 25, 2003, the West Settler's Advisory Board unanimously recommended that the demolition be approved. The building is not considered a unique architectural example within the City as it does not display extraordinary design or craftsmanship and its historic materials have been severely compromised. As previously stated,.the general contractor and the engineer's reports concluded that the structural integrity of the building had been severely compromised due to termite damage and wood rot, water infiltration, unsound floor boards, settlement concerns, and acute exposure to the elements. While the building is considered contributing, it lacks both structural and architectural integrity. Based on the analysis presented in the engineering report, recommendation of the West Settler's Advisory Board, and the analysis above, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR 4.5.1 (F) regarding the demolition of the contributing dwelling. 41,TEg1ATIVE AGTIPNS 1) Continue with direction. 2) Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the contributing building at 36 NW 4th Avenue. 3) Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the contributing building at 36 NW 4th Avenue, subject to a six month stay of demolition. RECOMMENDATION Based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F), approve COA 413 Continuation for the demolition of the contributing dwelling at 36 NW 4th Avenue. Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: HPB Staff Report, June 21, 2000, Engineering, General Contractor, & Architect Reports, Elevations, Survey Meeting Date:April 16,2003 Agenda Item: III.C. HISTOTRIC5 sPRES RVATI<C N zBOAIRD STAFF REPORT Project Name: COA-413, Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Project Location: 36 NW 4th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District .. _. T 1A BEFOREiT iE ( BOA�, 1 D The action requested of the Board is that of approval for the demolition of a contributing single family residence located in the West Settlers Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F). C K�G O U N b . , ,.... .. Research indicates that the building was constructed c. 1921 as the parsonage for the Greater Mt. Olive Baptist Church and was located on Lot 7 Block 28, to the rear of the church. It was moved to its present location in the 1950s when the church was enlarged. The building is of wood frame construction with a pyramid roof. The original front porch has been enclosed with glass jalousies. D-EGIPTI,ON ANALYSIS The residence, which is owned by the CRA, is located on Lot 9 of Block 28. In addition to this property, the CRA owns 2 vacant lots facing NW 5th Avenue and the lots fronting on West Atlantic Avenue in Block 28 (see the attached location map for clarification). The CRA has advertised for a Request for Proposals (RFP) from developers who will present specific redevelopment schemes for these lots, as well as for property that the agency owns in Block 36 to the east. It will be several weeks before a proposal is selected, therefore, it is not known at this time in what manner the subject lot will be redeveloped. The CRA has given the following narrative in the COA application as justification and explanation of the demolition request: We've had several contractors that specialize in historic restoration look at the house, we've offered to assist Mt. Olive to move the house and restore it, and we've offered to give it to Dharma (owners of the Sundy Inn and other downtown properties) All have come back to state that (1) it's structurally unsound, and (2) cost prohibitive. We don't believe that if it were RFP'ed for sale that there would be any takers. The church has stated that they would prefer to have it demolished. Meeting Date:June 21,2000 Agenda Item: 111-C HPB Staff Report COA-413 Page 2 Since the Williams have moved (former owners, the building is vacant) the structure seems to be gathering several vagrants on the back porch. Security is now an issue. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), The HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing in the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it• could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. As there are no definite plans for immediate reuse of the property it is appropriate to table the demolition request until (1) site development plans have been approved, or (2) a proposal is submitted to move the building to another location within the West Settlers Historic District. With respect to the vagrants and possible vandalism, as the owner of the property it is the CRA's responsibility to properly board up and secure the structure to eliminate the possibility of"demolition by neglect". AL EI NAT4IVE,.ACT ON.S..... _,r 4 1. Deny, with reasons stated. 2. Approve, with a 6-month delay. 3. Table to a future meeting. HPB Staff Report COA-413 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION 1. Table the demolition request until such time as: El Site development plans have been approved; or, El A proposal is submitted to move and renovate the building on another location within the West Settlers Historic District. 2. Require that the house be properly secured from vandalism to prevent "demolition by neglect". File/pz/hpb.COA-413-cra-demo-sr HIS<TOR°# PRESERVATION sBOARD `; Project Name: COA-413, Community Redevelopment Agency(CRA) Project Location: 36 NW 4th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District ;BEFORE ' HE BOA/RrD The action requested of the Board was that of approval for the demolition of a contributing single family residence located in the West Settlers Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F). ACTION AKEN BY THEt BOARD Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F) (1) the Board voted to table the demolition request until such time as: 0 Site development plans have been approved; or, 0 A proposal is submitted to move and renovate the building on another location within the West Settlers Historic District; and, Require that the house be properly secured from vandalism to prevent "demolition by neglect". File/pz/hpb.COA-413-cra-demo-sr Meeting Date: June 21,2000 Agenda Item: Ill-C immummimi THADDEUS COHEN ARCHITECT COMMENTARY MOUNT OLIVE PARSONAGE The Pompey House is a single family structure built circa 1920 in the West Settler's neighborhood of Delray Beach, Florida. The Mount Olive Parsonage, as it is known today, synthesizes the architectural features and standard practices of the residential style found in this neighborhood. The building is a wooden frame, two bedroom,one bathroom structure approximately 1,000 square feet. The house is organized as a modified shotgun with the bedrooms oriented along the longitudinal axis of the structure. This provides windows along two sides of each of the bedrooms to promote cross ventilation. The living room is entered directly from the porch which occupies one half of the front facade.A sitting room has a orientation towards the street and occupies the remaining front facade. The living room opens directly into the dining room whose entry is framed by a pair of columns and book shelves. The dining room is adjacent to the kitchen which leads to a porch at the rear of house. While the house has been altered over time the interior organization has maintained much of its original configuration. However, little of the interior's original materials have survived.. The wooden ceiling, paneled doors, wood trim around the windows and doors have been replaced. through maintenance and modernization. T he exterior is characterized by a hip roof, front porch and a series of paned windows. The floor construction is platform framing system 2 x 12 with a wood floor finish, sitting a top concrete piers.The crawl space provides a level of ventilation for the underside of the house. The wall structure is 2 x 6 wood studs faced on the exterior with slate siding a top 1 x 4 diagonal wood sheathing. At one time the structure was clad with slate siding. It can not be determined due to the various renovations the whether the material is original. Currently the structure is clad with metal siding.The interior of the stud is faced with wire mesh and plaster finish in some locations. The roof structure consists of 2 x 6 wood rafters with 1 x 4 wood decking and asphalt shingles for the finish roofing.The roof structure has also under gone significant modifications since its inception. The hip roof is the principal roof for the structure which incorporates the porch. In the original design the porch was a secondary dropped roof. 75 NE 6th AVE., #219 DELRAY BCH,FL 33483 561 . 276 . 4300 COMMENTARY MOUNT OLIVE PARSONAGE Page 2 cont. The exterior has under further renovations to include the enclosure of a portion of the front porch to create a sitting room and a screened area. Other modifications include the addition of a rear porch which was later enclosed to create a spare room. These modestly scaled additions reflect the a need for expansion. They are integrated in the structure with minimum effect. Due to the condition of the structure little of historic value is accessible for reuse. In conclusion the Mount Olive Parsonage House is a remnant of the many modest folk houses without stylistic detailing which were in inspired by the Craftsman movement in the decades from 1910 to 1930. This form of housing is most common in rural areas throughout the country. E:\200212 Mt.Olive House\Letters\client\description.wpd • :. sisNALywAjKo & ASSOCIATES INC./ CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2000 N.FLORIDA MANGO ROAD,SUITE 207,WEST PALM BEACH.FL 33409 • 407/478-4886 MICHAEL I. rorrwAix.-o. P.E. PRESIDENT May 15, 2001 • Community Redeveloperdent Agency 104 W. Atlantic Avenue Delray Beach, Florida Attn: Cheri. Johnson • Re: Existing House at 120 NW 4th Avenue, Delray Beach Structural Evaluation File Ref 01121 • Dear Ms. Johnson At your request I visited the above referenced site, at your request, • • in order to evaluate an existing house, detached garage and storage structure located on the property. Following is a report of my findings : • EXISTING STRUCTURES The main house is a one story wood framed structure, that was built in the early part of the 1900 's. The house is founded upon raised concrete block piers, and a partial concrete block stem wall . The floors are framed with 2 x 8 floor joists , that span north to south. • There are 2 rows of cross beams that support the floor framing. The cross beams are supported by concrete blocks, that appear to have placed directly on the soil , without the benefit of foundations. The cross beams and their supports were not built in .a workmanlike manner. The walls are framed with wood studs , and the walls' exteriors are clad with wood siding. The interior walls are plaster covered, and the ceilings are finished with bead board. The roof is conventionally framed, with members of unknown sizes. The roof is covered with ashpalt shingles . The detached one story garage, north of the house is a wood framed structure. The roof is framed with 2 x 4' s in a gable style, and is shingled to match the house . All structural members are exposed to view, as there is no interior wall or ceiling cladding. Community Redevelopement Agency • Re: Existing House at 120 NW 4th Avenue, Delray Beach May 15 , 2001 • Page 2 of • The garage walls rest on a block stem wall , on foundations of:. unknown size. • The storage structure is a masonry bearing wall type. that._ suppor.ts a - 'flat wood framed roof. - OBSERVATIONS • There is termite damage and water damage throughout. :_all - three structures. There appears to be an active infestation of=.t'ermites in the main house. Virtually all of the exterior wood stuctural studs of the,-main. house are iri distress . The wood siding has rotted' away, and _ no..::: longer provides a ` means .'to shed rain water away from the house iiite.rior Water has . been leaking into the .walls. and has rotted away -the button portions of the bearing members. The perimeter .wood beam which spans between piers along the exterior bearing wails has is rotted to a point to where it is no .. .longer functioning as intended. There are areas of floor in the Main .housethat are unsound, Portions. . of the floor boards are no longer supported by framing members Water has been intruding into the structure through the. roof.;.—and causing structural damage to_ the roof and ceiling support framing,: as there are numerous water stains on the walls and ceilings. • • There are pronounced _settlement problems throughout the . structure. The • bead ' board covered ceilings are separating due to , the differential settlement of the foundations as well as the - deterioration of the supporting wood structural members. There are pronounced cracks in the plaster that covers .the interior walls as well . The ridge along the west end of the roof of the main house i no longer level , which' indicates that. there is a major structural problem with the roof fra -ingmembers.. The roof is sagging approximately 2 to 3 inches by my judgement . • • The detached garage lists to one side; approximately 2 inches . The garage structure has .been repaired at some time in the past . New 2 x 4 wood studs were "sistered" on to the exi.s.it ng stuuds, no doubt,— • • Community Redevelopement Agency • Re: Existing House at 120 NW 4th Avenue, Delray Beach May 15 , 2001 Page. 3 of 4 to replace rotted lower portions of the bearing members. • The rotted ends of the studs were saw cut away and removed. The-:new "sistered" studs do not extend :the -full length of ..t.he Wall , as they should in a proper repair-. They stop near the midpoint: of the wail 's height, and are nailed to the sound portions of the original studs: • There are water stains on the exposed wood siding, that extends approximately 3 feet above. the garage floor that . corresponds to •the . . height of the new ..added repair. studs. : The original siding was reused to clad the repairs . The siding leaks, and light is visble . thr.ough the. walls . • • The roof framing has .been repaired in a manner similar to that-.of- the - stud walls . • • The storage building roof is water damaged . to the point of being .a • . threat to life safety. OPINIONS It is my opinion that all three structures are in. varying degrees • of distress . The termite and water damage is pervasive. Most of . the main structural bearing members are damaged and in need . of, . replacement. There are no hurricane anchors tying the structures together nor tying the walls down to the - foundations . • It is my opinion that the structures are beyond repair, with the exception of the storage building. . .RECOMMENDATION I recommend that the structures be demolished, as they are a hazard to - life safety. . • • • The garage should be razed as soon as possible, as it is my opinion • that it will not survive a minimal hurricane in its current state and may collapse at any time. I understand that there is desire to save the main house due to . its historic nature, and to move it to a new site and restore it . Community Pedeve l opement Agency Re: Existing House at 120 NW 4th Avenue, Delray Beach May 15 , 2001 Page 4 of 4 It is my opinion that the structure is not worth .savinq, as the cost of moving the house and making repairs would be far more expensive than recreating the structure's footprint and look. I , recommend: that a you contact a general contractor and obtain an estimate for cost of moving and repairing..the main house, based upon its existing condition, in order to aidyou in determining your course of. action. • Should there be any questions , please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, A YWAJK0 & INC. • Michael I . Naly aj o, P.E. President MIN/nbc FLORIDA • 150 N. Swinton Avenue-Suite 100.• [Delray Beach; FL 33444•561.272.1207 GENERAL CONTRACTOR e-mail: castlefl@bellsouth:net• www.castleflorida.corn • Fax 561.272.0117' Community Redevelopment Agency 104 West Atlantic Ave. • Delray.Beach,Fl. . Aft;Dave Shellbetter. Re:36 NW 4th Ave 7f12101 We have_inspected the existing house and have come to the following conclusions: •" .It appears as if the original structure may have asbestos siding materials that would have to be removed and abated prior to any other work being done. The original siding is • • completely covered with metal siding that would have to be removed before any. abatement could begin. , • • The existing structure has sustained extensive structural damage to the existing roof and: • all supporting wall structures • The building has experienced several areas of settlement which have caused structural damage through-out. y. Due to the poor structural condition of the existing structure it may requi a that substantial shoring and reconstruction will have to be done prior to any attempt to relocate this structure. • The interior has undergone several renovations but most appear to conceal old and damaged.areas.Very little of the interior finishes are original or have any architectural value. • The exterior has presently two layers of siding installed The original windows appear to have been removed and replaced several years ago:The existing roof and structure appears to have severe water damage clearly visible by numerous depressions and rot spots.The exterior has been remodeled several times but,there are no real architectural features of any prominence worth keeping. • Due to the new windload codes now in affect the entire structure would have to be rebuilt stud by stud and truss by truss to meet the hurricane codes:The labor to perform just this task will be cost prohibitive. • Recommendations: As you are aware, and as we have recently completed an extensive renovation very similar,the costs to try to bring this building up to code would be quite extensive. To renovate this structure to meet existing code for residential use would cost in the range of ($ 100.00.- $ 120.00 per s.f)or $ 100,000.00 to$120,000.00,which would be in addition to. Engineering, Architectural,Contractor fees and abatement,which could be as much as $35,000.00 additional. FLORIDA 150 N. Swinton Avenue-Suite 100• Delray Beach, FL 33444•561.272.1207 GENERAL CONTRACTOR e-mail: castlefl@bellsouth.net•.www.castleflorida.corfl 7 Fax: 561,272.0117 Page.(2) 7/12/01 To renovate the existing structure for commercial use would be approximately($ 150.00- $250.00 per s f. )or$ 150,000.00 to$250 000.00 depending upon the ADA.requirements; . . parking,and the building use and occupancy It is our recommendation that the existing structure be demolished.It would be wiser and more cost efficient have the house architecturally detailed and recreated on a clean site.:To maintain some of the historical aspects of the house some items may be able to be removed and reused. • Please call if you have any questions or if we can be of any further assistance. - Thank you, • Steve Zank Castle Florida Building Corp. t, 11� "11' �7. ♦ f Ls.f fit [t j • L 'S r4Art • y ..'..m.s-..'t•1',''`t-..,'.f-7-.-. ,,F x , - ry .l + +.- yam r t 1 • \.�•0I • 44y :4 .i - % ' ,i.,2t,.t:4)','-:. i•\V,4i.•,, ,. '... "Iik lir I . " P4::;-'.. il 114.1k 4 •irlis,,, - • — . A A?P' ii ' - _ .., RYq?-vim - � i. %• Ior • - • 1 , : jam ` ' i '. V`- " . \ ' 1_S - ••- .. • ,C-L;,, r L : � iP i' ..., ,. i - dam• i-k...;:::....-.,..,-,. .0 _ # , *: 1`�1St• -,: a\A. �.F'�Y• ' 1•31 •- • a i sk y. 11 1 • f . - r-..ri ti � �i: _- -- v w mac:• �• ,. _ , /. , - ' }- f 1 fay Ili ' t a 'ee_,.-;.W.A.-•;',—. - ., .; •• • .,-i,• , : '2;Iir•?,. 1-, f,',.. •'i.- .• . ;'- ,I.,.• •-•‘: -i.-1.4411F, c Aii...`.3, ,', '„...1.'.*. tr., :••• :'' ? • . •-'',15"7:1..-.31--• -z - •#4 -:,. -• • . ,., - • :-,-*„. ,,, ,0. --•-:+11v.,.; ,, . -4.,. ,-''''''. :•;.,-• f-.... •:: - , ..'f-.'' - ., a , , 44. •':-,, -'; -.. --.4,....•• -:-.'V. _--- - ---- 44'..-.4..i.. ' k4u..:-.S..• • ... ' ----7.---- .I: ,„.. Vi'1/41.- . ', . '' ... k.ci.... „...-- ,..,, -... 1 ••,..._ '<411i P'7 :. -t (,-.4.,,-- • ----- - ' 4, •• --poo -- k----..... "-:. , - ,,,.... .-441.r.,---Aitp, 4,--- . , ii•, ,‘ ,.. ,ifc-, / . !. • ' c.4... 4Z:sr iali61461 " ' - ,.. •• ,f-,P4' 1',I% • VAIIIIIII-vi °I° MO 1"":'.:4".•4 . . . r- _ — ---(s:. - 4. • ‘1' 4,••,!•-, •• .." "..• •• - ., '114..1 • 4 -4-,' 'rk *t'.-•W . . i • l• -5.• ..., --11(...ft....r. +. r • .- II- - ':' ' ' • I • ''' '-V,• ' ' .1,4.'•I.• ;;.I ' " ..),- 4 4*••\. .' .,„ !f -4 • '.4_;.'*:..4.c-f ' .. N .4.e• '. .. .• - i , 4'' .-.."10.••4 -• ' '...., ' . VOW •- _s 4: . ' •— .-. ., a,f'...:.„ I i•. tt -' ;JC..' '...I..' -,...:"-.••. ""...`- ;4;0 Z.- .st'IVO. •"' .4,-14 4,, ,,,.. ,,>,.:.,,„, ., ,,,....q. - 7,-. • ..t. . , , ,..00. •11,.. i•., , • .. ...: ;•-- . . - 4,-; ' -.,--..1.6.3...,rc4..4 --' 4;.-- . • -A - , ..: ./.• , .: • -4- - . 4.,,,, , ., ..- - .: •,, 4,... ,...•, . . _i. ,.. ..,..,..„.. . ,, • • ....; A . . - , . • _ ; - ) :,r, " ' ..< "- .,,.fr, --44,,,, lip : ,-t.''l• t•• '•10. - , ' '-'4. ',;;P:'0.Piiii ,t - s — ' . 14 , 4.-„ - .. .•••.4' t •-•"--.5%.4,'Al..if .'• —N4-• -* N — ' '.:7:- ./ '.'.*- ' f'-.,...,",-..•..;:' -':. 4 ',....-',Is-kes 1# . ....;-.- ,(- 1 s,1*43,4tt sea 41* '-A, -.... - •-..., 4- r.,,, - ,.. -Y-. , A' Irg• NT:,!..4t4 ::-', - .'7,,,,"74 1-,...'.,".-,':., . ,..-=,' _ 40: • , ... N , -4 ,--- i'•Ii. 1.;.s. ' . ‘...• ;?,..-' ,, . .•_„;..,. •••,e4; . - -V./rt ''' /,‘-> - , "" ' -. '''•• ..'''' '414-. -;Lt. .,,..;- -'-'-i*: :- .,.- -14, --tr '-- '• -- Li-_`' -' _.-- 'p - - --'k,,:" ..... .' 4- . ...., • ! ' '-1 vv. .. v , .... .,•• ...,. .4. ......__ ... ......,, • - , ',l1 4 1 14 , . .._ •• I's::% ;ft-...• ,,.-.-IL ...• •k4r it v Lv•-•‘‘ , * ' • :-V 41 . reI• , .-,---- - I A ,r,4 ':- „ .__..-:•., ---- ..,,,,, -:•.: 2.. , --___ -44--- - ' -.r.`-' lit...... _ t;,,t, ,..mii,,,, ,.- -- , .1-1 - 1 . ..... ., ' . • : --'' • 4 -'1,-.1, .'-'1.!,---'"--'--- , sZ-...- -'<.'- '..-, ---ierf-"' .-----:., . '•,, , < ...-A .1;;vt• -,#-• , _ 7-__..-r-,- .,4,S7.-F-:"------='' V.."-,""t '--- - .,T ''., "77' "" .r -itiro„.I0- • *4 0.-• ..• , i ,,-. 4 4-',.• , „.., '1,----4--.----:.‘ --"-;---1 - ' ',. ''',.,15'-,1 - -,. '''t!:.). • - - ' - -..,, ''''.* .iii-''IA1V-i.-- • ) . -' 'lit-r 4 ,44, i, - .. .-..114, . . . , ,.,-;, -,,,.1 - -,. r^,a:—„:"•0•1-i- =,,•*5 _ • • ' • :-V, . -'4',.1.9,4.,Z, %,-.-4 . ,* "-- ,-1-- • ,..1..., ,-., .......„„.. , ,,,4?•,, .-, -• -, -, ------„,,,. ., , ,...,i . i •,,i• ,-,,• , , ,. • . . .f• 11-47.. . ,:,...„ ,./....-.0„. •.• -II, A ...,„, : ,•••• -. ,, 4.4 ••••• ..„ ., . , li -..„., ,,,,.. •.. •, . ,;-.-....-.1-z'-•,- - - " e,•_.ii. - ' ' = ,- • iy4.7,-,4-'''• * 7.,• •"1.1, • . -- • . ' _. ',.1- , _, ...... , _. j . --- ---,..1;,"111C-,-A- 4t- i T - • -•-- ... - . . •, , ..1 ' „.t.A. ,r,. = -it 1},-,`,•.:- ._ -- •A• ---, '4:. ' •-. -4,,,,..... -••-- . . _'t 4 f: ;-7,C. ...Tr_ir- , - -..,..„-, --- -,....-- -_ ._ - - : - 4, .... ._.---,...:,....x4,4....,...,- —...,---0- -i:-L, ,---p-i.--1p•-z,,,„ ,..1%,...40,,,-....raii.:uotie- - - - . -a., =.ipvti, • • ,. • -. Yy DEL BEACH DELBAI'BEACH All-America City HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD I I I�.2, MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT II I P, 1993 - 1993 2001 - 2001 Agent: City of Delray Beach Project Name: Elimination of the Suggested HPB Exterior Building Color Chart ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of the elimination of the "City of Delray Beach Suggested HPB Exterior Building Color Chart," pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Background Shortly after the approval of Ordinance 13-87 which was a vehicle for the establishment of the City's first four historic districts (OSSHAD, Marina, Nassau Street, and Del-Ida Park) in 1988, any exterior alteration to a historically designated building, including exterior color changes, required either administrative or Historic Preservation Board approval. During this time, the City's Historic Preservation Planner, Patricia Cayce, and a local architect developed a color chart in order to facilitate those applicants who were uncertain about appropriate colors and to ease paperwork which was submitted for administrative approval for exterior color changes. In January 2003, the Historic Preservation Board revisited the need for a color chart and recommended elimination of the Exterior Building Color Chart. Administrative and, if necessary, Board approval would be in place for review and approval, in lieu of the color chart, providing applicants with a wider range of choices for the property owner. Analysis Development of the color chart provided a pre-approved palette intended to facilitate the review and approval process, however, no historical research or historic building paint analysis was conducted when the colors were chosen. Based on the fact that the palette is merely aesthetic and not supported by historical research or interpretation and since such analysis is not feasible to conduct to determine historically appropriate colors, it is recommended that the color chart be eliminated as most contemporary colors are appropriate for administrative approval and any controversial color schemes will be brought before the Board. Meeting Date; April 16, 2003 Agenda Item: IV.A. ,Consideration of the elimination of the Exterior Building Color Chart Page 2 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the elimination of the "City of Delray Beach Suggested HPB Exterior Building Color Chart," based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. C. Deny the elimination of the "City of Delray Beach Suggested HPB Exterior Building Color Chart," based upon a failure to find positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Approve the elimination of the "City of Delray Beach Suggested HPB Exterior Building Color Chart," based upon a failure to find positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. Report Prepared by:Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner R DELRAY BEAplj - DEEBAY BEACH bitzt ji HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD j II�s MEMORADUM STAFF 'REPORT I IT 1993 1993 2001 2001 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGARDING AN AMENDMENT TO LDR 4.5.1(M), TAX ABATEMENTS AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is an amendment to the Section 4.5.1(M) of the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) regarding tax exemptions and historic properties. The amendment is being processed in accordance with LDR Section 2.4.5(M). Pursuant to Section 1.1.6, an amendment to the LDRs may not be made until a recommendation is obtained from the Planning and Zoning Board. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The proposed amendment is to provide clarification to the tax abatement process contained within the Land Development Regulations and to reflect the amendment to Florida Administrative Code (FAC) Chapter 1A-38, "Tax Exemption for Historic Properties", which went into effect in September 2000. The FAC currently states that a tax exemption application may be processed before, during, or after a project has been initiated. Previously, a project could only be initiated prior to the beginning of the construction and preferably concurrently or after site plan and/or Certificate of Appropriateness approval. Based on the above, any reference to "pre-construction" should be omitted and replaced with "construction" including "Pre-construction Application" to "Construction Application." LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(11)(a) states the Historic Preservation Board will issue a written order to the applicant when denial or approval has been given. However, this should be the responsibility of the Historic Preservation Planner, who currently provides written notice if a request is denied. Therefore, reference in Section 4.5.1(M)(11)(a) to the Board's issuance of a written statement has been removed and replaced with "Historic Preservation Planner." Due to the amendment of the FAC 1A-38 which added that Part I of the Construction Application may be submitted "before during, or after qualifying improvements are initiated," a time limitation has been added to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(8)(a) which requires the submission of Part I of the Construction Application (upon completion of a project) within 18 months from the date of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. As this is the standard Certificate of Appropriateness and/or Site Plan approval, eighteen months is considered a fair and appropriate time for submission once the work is completed. Further, the definition of an appropriate property improvement should be incorporated into the text of Section 4.5.1(M)(5), "Qualifying Properties and Improvements," in order to clarify the appropriate improvements eligible for the tax abatement. The definition should read as follows: "a real property improvement is defined as changes in the condition of real property brought about by the expenditure of labor and money for the restoration, Meeting Date: April 16,2003 Agenda Item: IV.B. property brought about by the expenditure of labor and money for the restoration, renovation, or rehabilitation of such property. Improvement shall include additions to the principal contributing structure and associated accessory structures (i.e. a garage, cabana, guest cottage, storage/utility structure, swimming pools) so long as the new construction is compatible with the historic character of the building and site in terms of size, scale, massing, design, and materials, and preserves the historic relationship between a building or buildings, landscape features, and open space." Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(M)(5), approval of an LDR amendment must be based upon a finding that the amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As noted previously, this amendment is being initiated more for clarification purposes than to fulfill any specific Comp Plan policy. While the amendment does not specifically further the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan, it is not inconsistent with them. RECOMMENDED ACTION By motion, recommend to the Planning & Zoning Board approval of the amendment to Section 4.5.1(M), Tax Exemption for Historic Properties, based upon positive findings with LDR Section 2.4.5(M). Report written by Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments:LDR 4.5.1(M), amended SECTION 4.5.1 (M) (14) (a) (M) Tax Exemption for Historic Properties: (1) The City Commission hereby creates a tax exemption for the restoration, renovation or rehabilitation of qualifying historic properties designated in Section 4.5.1 K & L as amended. Qualifying properties shall be exempt from that portion of ad valorem taxation levied by the City of Delray Beach on 100% of the increase in assessed value resulting from any renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the qualifying property made on or after the effective date of this ordinance. (2) The above exemption does not apply to: (a) Taxes levied for payment of bonds; (b) Taxes authorized by a vote of the electors pursuant to Section 9(b) or Section 12, Article 7 of the Florida Constitution; or (c) Personal property. (3) Duration of Tax Exemption: (a) The exemption period shall be for ten (10) years, beginning January 1st following the year in which final approval is given by the City Commission and the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser has been instructed to provide such exemption. However, the City Commission shall have the discretion to set a lesser term if requested by the property owner in the original application. (b) The term of the exemption shall be specified in the resolution approving the exemption and shall continue regardless of any changes in the authority of the City to grant such exemption.or change in ownership of the property. To retain an exemption, the historic character of the property and the improvements which qualified the property for an exemption must be maintained in their historic state over the period for which the exemption was granted. (4) Effective Date of Exemption: The effective date of the tax exemption shall be January 1 of the year following the year in which a historic preservation exemption covenant is recorded and a copy of the Final Application and resolution of the City Commission, as approved, have been transmitted to the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser. 4520 SECTION 4.5.1 (M) (14) (a) (5) Qualifying Properties and Improvements: (a) The following real property in the City is a qualifying property for the purposes of this ordinance if at the time the exemption is approved by the City Commission, the property: (i) is individually listed in the National Register of Historic Places pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended; or, (ii) is a contributing property to a National Register-listed district; or, (iii) is designated as a historic property, or as a contributing property to a historic district, under the terms of the City's historic preservation ordinance; and, (iv) has been certified by the Historic Preservation Board as satisfying (a) (i), (ii), or (iii). (b) For an improvement to a historic property to qualify the property for an exemption, the improvement must: (i) be consistent with the United States Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended; (iii) be determined an improvement by the Historic Preservation Board as to meet criteria established in rules adopted by the Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, FAC 1 A-38, as amended which defines a real property improvement is defined as changes in the condition of real property brought about by the expenditure of labor and money for the restoration, renovation, or rehabilitation of such property. Improvements shall include additions to the principal contributing building and associated accessory structures (i.e. a garage, cabana, quest cottage, storage/utility structures, swimming pools) as long as the new construction is compatible with the historic character of the building and site in terms of size, scale, massing, design, and materials, and preserves the historic relationship between a building or buildings, landscape features, and open space. 4520 • SECTION 4.5.1 (M) (14) (a) (iii.) be consistent with Section 4.5.1(E), "Development Standards", of the City's Land Development Regulations; and (iv) include, as part of the overall project, visible improvements to the exterior of the structure. (6) Evaluation of Property Used for Government or Nonprofit Purposes: (a) For purposes of the exemption under Section 196.1998, Florida Statutes, a property is being used for government or nonprofit purposes if the sole occupant of at least 65 percent of the useable space is an agency of the federal, state or a local government unit or a nonprofit organization certified by the Department of State under Section 617.013, Florida Statutes. (b) For purposes of the exemption under Section 196.1998, Florida Statutes, a property is considered regularly and frequently open to the public if public access to the property is provided not less than 12 days a year on an equitably spaced basis, and at other times by appointment. Nothing herein shall prohibit the owner from charging a reasonable nondiscriminatory admission fee, comparable to fees charged at similar facilities in the area. (7) Application for Exemption: (a) Any property owner, or the authorized agent of the owner, that desires an ad valorem tax exemption for the improvement of a historic property must file a written Tax Exemption Application with the Planning and Zoning Department. The application shall be made on the two-part Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application, approved by the State of Florida, Division of Historical Resources. Part 1 of the application, the PreConstruction Application, shall be submitted before I during, or after qualifying improvements are initiated and Part 2, the Final Application/Request for Review of Completed Work, shall be submitted upon completion of the qualifying improvements. The Final Application shall contain the Historic Preservation Exemption Covenant, as provided for herein. (8) Part 1, eConstruction Application: (a) A prcConstruction Application shall be filed with the Planning and Zoning Department before, during, or after the qualifying project is initiated constructed. The ProConstruction Application shall also 4520 • SECTION 4.5.1 (M) (14) (a) contain information concerning the proposed estimated cost of the qualifying improvements .and be accompanied by a copy of the most recent tax bill from the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser for the property. Upon receipt of the PreConstruction Application, the Historic Preservation Planner shall review the application and determine whether the application is complete and whether the property satisfies the requirements of Section 4.5.1(M)(4)(a) and is therefore eligible for review by the Historic Preservation Board. If Part I of the Construction Application is submitted after the project has been completed, the application must be submitted within 18 months from the date of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (9) Review of lareConstruction Application by the Historic Preservation Board: [^ . 50-96;-1T: 96; (a) The Historic Preservation Board shall review the PreConstruction Application within 60 days of the Historic Preservation Planner's determination of eligibility. The exterior portion of the work shall be reviewed in accordance with the Certificate of Appropriateness review process simultaneously with the Part 1, PreConstruction Application. If site plan approval or a variance is required for the project, the respective applications shall be presented to the Historic Preservation Board in conjunction with the Certificate of Appropriateness review process. A PreConstruction Application which—requires—Beard--review and approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness shal-I—Rot be—considered until the CeFtificate of Appropriateness is approved by the Historic Preservation Board. (i) If the Historic Preservation Board determines that the work as proposed is a qualifying improvement and is in compliance with the review standards contained in Section 4.5.1(M)(4), the PreConstruction Application and, if applicable, the Certificate of Appropriateness shall be approved by the Historic Preservation Board., and the Board shall issue a written order to the applicant. (ii) If the Historic Preservation Board determines that the work as proposed is not a qualifying improvement or is not in compliance with the review standards contained in Section 4.5.1(M)(4), corrective measures shall be prescribed by the Board the-applicant-shall be so advised. in writing. 4520 • SECTION 4.5.1 (M) (14) (a) (10) Issuance of Other Permits or Approval• (a) The Building Department must review and approve all requirements before issuing a building permit. The Building Department shall review all plans prior to the Historic Preservation Board's review. (11) Part 2, Final Application/Request for Review of Completed Work: (a) If the Historic Preservation Board determines that the work is a qualifying improvement and is in compliance with the review standards contained in Section 4.5.1(M)(4), the Board shall approve the Final Application/Request for Review of Completed Work and the Historic Preservation Planner shall issue a written order to the applicant. The_City Historic Preservation Planner will inspect the completed work to verify such compliance. The review of the Historic Preservation Board shall be completed within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the completed Final Application/Request for Review of Completed Work as verified by the Historic Preservation Planner. (b) The Final Application/Request for Review of Completed Work shall be accompanied by documentation of the total cost expenditures of the qualifying improvements. Appropriate documentation may include, but is not limited to, paid contractor's bills, AIA Forms 702- 7034, canceled checks, copies of invoices, and an approved building permit application listing the cost of work to be performed. Upon the receipt of a Final Application/Request for Review of Completed Work and all required supporting documentations, the Historic Preservation Board shall conduct a review at a regularly scheduled public meeting to determine whether or not the completed improvements are in compliance with the work described in the PreConstruction Application, approved amendments, if any, and Section 4.5.1(M)(4)(b). After the above mentioned review, the Historic Preservation Board shall recommend that the City Commission grant or deny the exemption. (c) If the Historic Preservation Board determines that the work as completed is either not a qualifying improvement or is not in compliance with the review standards contained in Section 4.5.1(M)(4), the applicant shall be advised that the Final Application has been denied. Such deenial-shall be in writing and Tthe Historic Preservation Planner shall provide a written summary of the reasons for the determination to the applicant. 4520 SECTION 4.5.1 (M) (14) (a) (12) Appeal to the Historic Preservation Board's Decision: (a) Review and reversal of any action taken by the Historic Preservation Board is appealable to the City Commission pursuant to Section 2.4.7(E), "Appeals". [ mrl. Ord. 50_96 11 6] (13) Approval by the City Commission: (a) Upon approval of a Final Application/Request for Review of Completed Work by the Historic Preservation Board, the Final Application shall be placed by resolution on the agenda of the City Commission for approval. The resolution of the City Commission approving the Final Application shall provide the name of the owner of the property, the property address and legal description, require the owner to a recorded the restrictive covenants as provided in Section 4.5.1(M)(13A in the official records of Palm Beach County as a condition of receiving the exemption, and the effective dates of period of time the exemption will remain in effect, including and--the expiration date of the exemption. (14) Historic Preservation Exemption Covenant: (a) To qualify for an exemption, the applicant must sign and return the Historic Preservation Exemption Covenant with the Final Application/Request for Review of Completed Work. The covenant shall be in a form approved by the City of Delray Beach City Attorney's Office which was established by the Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, and applicable for the term for which the exemption is granted and shall require the character of the property and qualifying improvements to be maintained during the period that the exemption is granted, (b) On or before the effective date of the exemption, the owner of the property shall have the covenant recorded in the official records of Palm Beach County, Florida, and shall cause a certified copy of the recorded covenant to be delivered to the City's Historic Preservation Planner. Such covenant shall be binding on the current property owner, transferees, and their heirs, assigns and successors. A violation of the covenant shall result in the property owner being subject to the payment of the differences between the total amount of the taxes which would have been due in March of each of the previous years in which the covenant or agreement was in effect had the property not received the exemption and the total amount of taxes actually paid in those years, plus interest on the difference calculated as provided in Sec. 212.12(3), Florida Statutes, 4520 SECTION 4.5.1 (M) (14) (a) (15) Completion of Work: (a) An applicant must complete all work within two (2) years following the date of approval of a Part 1 PreConstruction Application by the Historic Preservation Board. A PreConstruction Application shall be automatically revoked if the property owner has not submitted a Final Application/Request for Review of Completed Work within two (2) years following the date of approval of the PreConstruction Application. (b) The City Commission, upon the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Board, may extend the time for completion of a substantial improvement in accordance with the procedures of the City's Building Code. (16) Notice of Approval to the Property Appraiser: (a) Upon the receipt of a certified copy of the recorded restrictive covenant by the Historic Preservation Planner, the Preservation Planner shall transmit a copy of the approved Final Application/Request for Review of Completed Work, the exemption covenant and the resolution of the City Commission approving the Final Application and authorizing the tax exemption to the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser.- (b) The resolution approving an historic tax exemption must be filed with the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser on or before January Marsh 1st of the year in which an exemption is requested. Therefore, the Final Application/Request for Review of Completed Work must be submitted no later than November 1st of the year the work was completed in order to process the application for both the Historic Preservation Board and City Commission approvals. (17) Revocation Proceedings: (a) The Historic Preservation Board may initiate proceedings to revoke the ad valorem tax exemption provided herein, in the event the applicant, or subsequent owner or successors in interest to the property, fails to maintain the property according to the terms, conditions and standards of the Historic Preservation Exemption Covenant. (b) The Historic Preservation Board shall provide notice to the current owner of record of the property and hold a revocation hearing in the same manner as in Section 4.5.1(M)(10), and make a recommendation to the City Commission. (c) The City Commission shall review the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Board and make a determination as to whether the tax 4520 SECTION 4.5.1 (M) (14) (a) exemption shall be revoked. Should the City Commission determine that the tax exemption shall be revoked, a written resolution revoking the exemption and notice of penalties as provided in Paragraph 4 of the covenant shall be provided to the owner, the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser, and filed in the official records of Palm Beach County. (d) Upon receipt of the resolution revoking the tax exemption, the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser shall discontinue the tax exemption on the property as of January 1st of the year following receipt of the notice of revocation. • 4520 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- •MEETING DATE: April 16, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Ill. A. ITEM: Kemish Office Building (131 North Swinton Avenue)—Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness Associated with a Class V Site Plan and Waiver Requests for the Conversion of a Single Family Home to an Office. METHODIST — CHURCH a GENERAL DATA: N.w. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST Owner/Applicant James W. & Steven W. Mish Agent .. Cope Architects, Inc. • Location East side of Swinton Avenue, approximately 150' south of LaCITY Martin Luther King Jr. Drive ATTORNEY = _ (Northeast 2nd Street). c9 I BUILDING .:�= Property Size 0.23 Acres LUTHER KING JR. V.W. 2ND ST. MARTIN DRIVE>.N.E. 2ND S, Future Land Use Map OMU (Other Mixed Use) z .,= Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School " • kielliPv2 Nin Square Historic Arts District) i HCI ATY IN Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District NI East: OSSHAD (Old School Square ii = Historic Arts District N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST South: OSSHAD (Old School Square i Historic Arts District West: OSSHAD (Old School Square 3 COMMUNITY J2 CENTER Historic Arts District Existing Land Use Single Family Residence. TENNIS OLD Proposed Land Use Certificate of appropriateness STADIUM 11111 SCHOOL associated with a class SQUARE V site plan and waiver ATLANTIC A V E. requests for the conversion SOUTH11 of a single family COURT a� ---"�Z 0 home to an office. HOUSE - Water Service Existing on site. 111z Sewer Service Existing on site. MN— N - - S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST U, • \I- — III. A. • ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 131 North Swinton Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class V Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; ❑ Design Elements; and, ❑ Waiver Requests The subject property is located on the east side of North Swinton Avenue, approximately 200' north of NE 1st Street. BACKGROUND Zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), the property consists of Lot 3, Block 67, Town of Delray, and currently contains a 1,557 square foot contributing, single family dwelling constructed in 1935. Located on an interior lot on the east side of North Swinton Avenue, the property is currently situated between a single family home and an office. In November 2002, a Certificate of Appropriateness was administratively approved for the in-kind repair of rotted and deteriorated wood. There are no other recent administrative or Historic Preservation Board reviews of this property. The applicant has submitted a Class V Site Plan application for the conversion of the single family residence to an office building and is now before the Board for consideration. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal includes the following: o Conversion of a 1,557 sq. ft. one-story, single family home to office; ❑ Construction of a 200 sq. ft. addition on the front façade (west) of the building; o Construction of a six (6) space asphalt parking lot including one handicapped accessible space; and, o Installation of a brick sidewalk, concrete walkways, associated landscaping, and refuse container area. Meeting Date:April 16, 2003 Agenda Item: III.A. •HPB Staff Report • 131 North Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements A Page 2 SITE PLAN ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The applicable development standards that relate to the proposal are as follows: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 15' Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 25' 33'8" Side Interior (north) 7'6" 16' Side Interior (south) 7'6" 18'6" Rear 10' 55'9" Open Space 25% 39% LDR Section 4.4.24 (OSSHAD-Special District Regulation): Parking Requirement: Pursuant to LDR 4.4.24(G)(4)(a) all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. As the proposed use is office, parking is calculated at one space per 300 sq. ft. A double loaded parking bay is proposed at the east side of the property with access taken off of the improved alley and a one-way entrance drive from North Swinton Avenue. The existing building (1,557 sq. ft.) along with the 200 sq. ft. will contain a total of 1,757 sq. ft. Based on the proposed square footage, 5.85 or 6 parking spaces total are required, which have been provided and include one handicapped space. The parking calculations on the current site plan do not reflect these parking requirements. New calculations reflecting the requirement of 5.85 or 6 spaces should be indicated on the site plan and has been attached as a condition of approval. -HPB Staff Report , 131 North Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 3 LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Drive Aisle Width: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(b), the point of access to a street or alley shall not be less than 12' for a one-way driveway or parking lot aisle. The applicant is proposing the construction of a 10' wide, drive aisle to replace the existing asphalt driveway and provide one-way access to the rear parking area, while also providing a 3'6" wide landscape strip along the north property line. The applicant has requested an internal adjustment to reduce the width. Internal Adjustment Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(C)(5), concurrent with granting relief from a development standard or regulation, the granting body must find that such relief does not diminish the practical application of the affected regulation (requirement) and that by granting such relief a superior development product will result. Due to the narrow width and the configuration of the proposed drive aisle it is recommended an 11' wide drive aisle is installed and a 2'6" landscape strip is provided. Further, in order to provide a wider turning radius for vehicles entering from North Swinton Avenue to the rear parking lot, the proposed landscape island adjacent to the rear entrance should be reduced in length by 3' excluding the curbing and any proposed landscape canopy within the island should clear the gable roof and oncoming traffic when at full height. The City Engineer supports the reduced drive aisle width to 11', subject to the turning radius increase described above, which is attached as a condition of approval. Bike Rack Pursuant to LDR 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided at any non- residential use within the City's TCEA (Transportation Concurrency Exception Area) which, through the development review process, is determined to generate a demand. The TCEA includes the Old School Square Historic District. In addition, Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan requires bicycle facilities on all new development and redevelopment with particular emphasis on development within the TCEA. The proposed bike rack is located adjacent to the handicap access panel to the east (rear) of the building. This location is inappropriate for the site as it cannot be viewed from the right- of-way and access to and from the rack can only be obtained from the alley or through the drive aisle. It is therefore recommended that the bike rack be relocated to the front of the property at the south end of the sidewalk adjacent to the front entrance of the building. The applicant should also submit a detail of the proposed bike rack. These have been added as conditions of approval. Site Lighting Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting is required on site for new development proposals. A photometric plan has been submitted to meet this requirement as outlined in LDR Section 4.6.8. Further, site lighting locations are reflected on the site, landscape, and -HPB Staff Report • 131 North Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 4 engineering plans and decorative fixture details were provided. It is noted the light locations on the site plan indicate two light globes per pole. These should reflect single fixtures. Underground Utilities Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.8, utility facilities serving the development shall be located underground throughout the development. The site plan does not indicate the relocation of the overhead utility lines underground. This has been added as a condition of approval in the technical comments. Sidewalks Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-way adjacent to the property. An existing 5' sidewalk currently runs along North Swinton Avenue providing accessibility to the building via the existing driveway. As this is not a pedestrian friendly accessway to the building, a condition of approval has been added to construct a pedestrian pathway between the existing sidewalk and the building's entrance on the west elevation to compliment the proposed interlocking paver walkway at the porch. Refuse Container Area The proposed refuse area is centered at the south end of the property adjacent to the building. The refuse container, including recyclables, will be placed on a concrete pad and screened by a 5' high, white, wood picket fence and access is provided by a 3' wide wood gate which swings open to the east towards the parking lot. While the minimum requirements have been met for the refuse container, there is no notation of the concrete pad as shown on the site plan. A notation providing this information has been added as technical item. Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) That site data be provided on the site plan including the current and proposed building setbacks and open space. 2) All utility lines are to be buried underground and noted on the site and engineering plans. 3) That the bike rack be relocated adjacent to the front entrance and a detail provided. 4) That a walkway be constructed between the existing sidewalk and the building's entrance separate from the proposed drive aisle entrance. 5) That the concrete pad for the refuse container be indicated on the site plan. 6) Provide a cross section at the north, east and west property lines. Provide existing and proposed grades on all cross sections include south section (swale section). 7) Add the following note to the site plan: "See Engineering plans for pavement parking." -HPB Staff Report . 131 North Swinton Avenue -Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 5 8) That the parking calculations reflect the current and proposed square footage of the building at 1,757 sq. ft. and one parking space per 300 sq. ft. 9) That the square footage for the proposed project be consistent between the site plan and the engineering plan. 10) Update the submitted traffic statement to reflect the current square footage of the conversion. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS Both existing and proposed landscaping will be interspersed throughout the property. Existing landscaping consists of a Gumbo Limbo and a Pongam Tree at the southwest corner of the property, a relocated Gumbo Limbo at the center of the property in front of the building, and an existing Pongam adjacent to the west corner of the property and the adjacent property. Proposed landscaping includes Live Oaks, Plumeria and Solitaire Palms along the perimeter of the proposed parking area. A variety of underplantings that include Red Ginger, Mixed Bromeliads, Cat Palms, Cocoplum, Crotons, Hawaiian Ti Plants, Crinum Lillies, Dwarf Firebush, Pink Ixora, Wax Jasmine, Sword Ferns, Red Passion Vines, Blue Plumbago, Wart Fern, King's Mantle, and Coontis will surround the extant building and line the north and south property lines. The proposed landscaping complies with the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16 with the exception of the reduction of the landscape strip along the north edge of the property line from five feet (5') to three feet six inches (3'6"). Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscape strip of not less than 5' in width, excluding curbing, shall be located between the vehicular use area and abutting properties and that a minimum landscape barrier shall be a minimum of 24" in height at the time of planting along the perimeter landscape barrier that separates the vehicular use area from abutting properties. A waiver to this requirement has been requested. Waiver Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscape strip of not less than five (5) feet in width, excluding the curbing, shall be located between the vehicular use area and abutting properties. The proposal includes a request for a waiver to reduce the landscape strip on the north property line from the required 5' to 3'6" to accommodate the construction of a paver drive aisle. The proposed 10' wide driveway is to be located along the northern perimeter of the property from North Swinton Avenue leading to the rear double bay parking lot. As discussed under "Drive Aisle Width" it is recommended that the drive aisle is a minimum of 11' wide thus, the landscape strip will be reduced accordingly to 2'6", which is discussed below. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(6)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: •HPB Staff Report 131 North Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 6 a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; and, d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Given the site constraints, the waiver is necessary to accommodate a drive aisle from N. Swinton Avenue to the rear parking area. Due to the narrow width of the drive aisle, it would be best to accommodate a smaller landscape strip and expand the drive aisle from the proposed 10' to 11' in width. This can be accomplished with the elimination of the Sword Fern along the drive aisle and the reduction of the landscape strip from 3'6" to 2'6". Given the analysis above, the waiver request will neither adversely affect the neighboring area nor grant a special privilege to the property owner based on the current configuration of the property and the City's right-of-way improvements. No public facilities will be at risk and no unsafe situations shall be formed by the granting of this waiver, provided an asphalt or concrete driveway apron is installed. Based on this analysis, positive findings can be made to grant the requested waiver pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B). Landscape Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1)That the landscape plan reflect the 6" type "D" curbing along the proposed drive aisle. 2)That the proposed Plumeria in the landscape island adjacent to the rear entrance be replaced with foliage that will clear the gable roof/traffic isle. DESIGN ELEMENTS/ANALYSIS Residential Conversion to Commercial The proposal includes conversion of a contributing, one-story residential building to office. The frame vernacular building is approximately 1,557 sq. ft. The building will be rehabilitated based on its original vernacular footprint with the exception of the extant additions at the rear (east) of the building and an increase of the floor area of the front porch. The one-story, cross gable, frame dwelling displays original detailing such as wood clapboard siding, cross gable roof, and vertical wood gable detailing. None of the original wood frame windows remain in the house however replacement windows will consist of 4/4 and 6/6 single hung sash, vinyl clad, wood core windows on the front façade and 4/4, 6/6, and 8/8 single hung sash, aluminum frame windows on the remaining elevations. All existing and proposed windows and doors are impact resistant therefore not requiring the installation of shutters. The flat, white concrete tile and rafter tails will remain. Some of the rehabilitation was completed by the previous contractor prior to Board approval and consequently some of the rehabilitation work such as the installation of windows and the rear addition are complete. -HPB Staff Report , 131 North Swinton Avenue -Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 7 The proposed project includes the installation of decorative elements at the front entrance with porch details that include new wood columns, railings and brackets. The new porch will be extended from the original footprint in a bowed design approximately 2'9" further at its apex. The east elevation resembles that found on the west elevation with two front facing gables with wood clapboard siding and vertical detailing within the gables themselves. A porch entrance is also proposed at the rear of the building which will incorporate the handicapped access ramp and criss-cross pattern railing along the east elevation leading to the rear entryway and porch. Located at the northeast corner of the building, the porch will extend out from the existing gable to create a covered porch with columns, brackets, and railing details intended to match those found on the front (west façade) porch. The design for the new rear entry also incorporates the construction of a new louvered wood cupola with flag atop the gable at the rear entrance. A round decorative gable vent will complete the decorative elements at the rear. A new color palette is proposed with the project which includes the use of "Botanical Tint," a light mossy green color for the body of the building, "Snowbird," a sky blue for the recessed porches and gable ends, and white accents and trim. As these colors are variations of those listed on the "HPB Suggested Exterior Building Colors List" and as the colors can be found within the surrounding district the color scheme can be supported. LDR Section 4.5.1(E)-Design Elements Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(8), (E)(8)(d), (E)(g) and (E)(4), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating alterations or additions of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: a) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. b) The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the opening exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. c) The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with prevalent architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on historic sites, buildings, and structures within a district. d) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. •HPB Staff Report 131 North Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 8 The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: 1) A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2) The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 3) Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other building, shall not be undertaken. 4) Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 5) Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. 6) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Analysis The proposed rehabilitation includes the construction of a new entry porch centered on the west façade and another at the northeast corner of the east façade. A site visit and inspection of the porch reveals that the current porch is not stable and most probable not original to the house. As this is the case, the construction of a new footprint can and the addition of design elements can be supported as the arced design of the porch and the detailing of the supports will differentiate it from the original building. The same can be said of the porch addition at the rear of the property particularly since the rear porch entrance cannot be viewed from the Swinton Avenue right-of-way with the exception of a portion of the louvered cupola and flag. While the use of cupolas are historically appropriate for wood frame buildings, the asymmetrical location and use of a flag draws attention to this conjectural feature. Also, the cupola will be partially obscured from the existing roof line. As the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation recommends against the addition of conjectural features and as there is no physical evidence that a cupola was constructed on this building, the construction of a cupola on the northeast corner of the building should not be supported and its removal has been added as a condition of approval. .HPB Staff Report , 131 North Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements • Page 9 REQUIRED FINDINGS ', Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Other Mixed Use (OMU) and a zoning designation of Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(B)(2), within the OSSHAD zoning district, business and professional offices are listed as permitted uses. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A), Future Land Use Map Consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan was conducted and no applicable goals, objectives or policies were found. Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and •HPB Staff Report . 131 North Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 10 nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bounded by the OSSHAD zoning district with a combination of commercial, office, and residential uses. Compatibility is not a concern, as the proposed mixed use of the subject property would be permitted on the surrounding properties. The proposal retains the existing residential character, building style, scale, and massing. Based on the above, the development will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent properties. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency The project proposed for the Kemish Office Building was reviewed by the CRA during its meeting on February 13, 2003. The CRA Board recommended approval. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves the conversion of a 1,557 sq. ft. single family home and 200 sq. ft. addition to office. The proposed waiver to reduce the perimeter landscape strip and the internal adjustment to reduce the width of the drive aisle can be supported in order to accommodate the driveway. With respect to the elevations, however, the proposed cupola should not be provided. The proposal will be consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan with changes as identified in this staff report. These changes are outlined as conditions of approval. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements for 131 North Swinton Avenue, Kemish Office, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements for 131 North Swinton Avenue, Kemish Office, based upon failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1. (E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k) with basis stated. •HPB Staff Report . 131 North Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 11 STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Waiver Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), to reduce the landscape strip from the required 5' to 2'6", based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B). Internal Adjustment Approve the internal adjustment to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(4)(d), to reduce the one-way drive aisle along the north property line from the required 12' width to 11', based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(C), subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed landscape island adjacent to the rear entrance be reduced in length by 3' excluding the curbing and any proposed landscape canopy within the island clear the gable roof and oncoming traffic when at full height. Site Plan Approve the COA for the Class V site plan for the mixed use development at 131 North Swinton Avenue, Kemish Office, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That the length of the landscape island adjacent to the rear entrance be reduced by three (3) feet to accommodate an adequate turning radius. Landscape Plan Approve the COA for the landscape plan for 131 North Swinton Avenue, Kemish Office, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16. 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. Design Elements Approve the COA for the original of the Class V site plan for the mixed use development at 131 North Swinton Avenue, Kemish Office, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8), subject to the following conditions: 1) Eliminate the louvered cupola and flag at the northeast corner of the building. •HPB Staff Report . 131 North Swinton Avenue -Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 12 Attachments: Survey, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations, Floor Plan Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner •HPB Staff Report . 131 North Swinton Avenue -Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 13 APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists via a service lateral connection to the 10" water main along North Swinton Avenue. ❑ Sewer service exists via a service lateral connection to a 8" sewer main within the adjacent north/south ally. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided via existing a fire hydrant on the corner of N. Swinton Avenue and NE 1st Street and at the corner of North Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd Street. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build- out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standards. Drainage: A preliminary drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on- site via sheet flow to a swale area along the south side of the property. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD, and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The proposed 1,757 sq. ft. office will generate approximately 31 additional daily trips which will not have a significant impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Schools: As the subject property is located in the City's TCEA and the proposal involves a non-residential use, this project is exempt from School Concurrency. Parks and Recreation Facilities: Parks dedication requirements do not apply to this non-residential use. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for conversion of a single family dwelling to an office. Trash generated each year by the proposed 1,757 sq.ft. office will be 4.74 tons of solid waste per year (1,757 x 5.4 T 2,000 = 4.74). The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of service -HPB Staff Report 131 North Swinton Avenue -Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 14 standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. •HPB Staff Report ' 131 North Swinton Avenue- Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 15 APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent Will be met once a bike rack is relocated C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent -HPB Staff Report 131 North Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 16 F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent • POST — m CASON OFFICE : -- LEGEND -- METHODIST I KEMISH • CHURCH m - : OFFICE j BUILDING hi a a < • a — : CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS i -- � ' ASSOCIATED WITHA N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD gT_ CLASS V SITE PLAN Li - 131 N.SWINTON AVENUE > w a > a SUBJECT AREA IMESE CITY LJJ N z ca iz SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ATTORNEY PCN#:12-43-46-16-01-067-0030 o BUILDING cc M APPROXIMATE ACREAGE:0.23 N.W. 2ND ST. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE > N.E. 2ND ST ABRIDGED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TOWN OF DELRAY LOT 3 BLK a Q 67(OLD SCHOOL SQUARE N N a I HISTORIC DISTRICT) w ZONING:OSSHAD(OLD > SCHOOL c ill SQUARE HISTORIC ARTS w Z DISTRICT) a FLUM:OMU(OTHER MIXED z CITY Q UE)• HALL zaIXISTINGLAND USAGE: / SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. WITHIN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS . ' ZONE:#536 Q I g i ` WITHIN CENSUS / Z \\ /// IIITRACT:#65.02 / COMMUNITY LiW z CENTER Z Z111 I. ,� I & ZONING L` _ PLANNING DEPARTMENT TENNIS OLD �T STADIUM I i SCHOOLl�SQUARE I I I k ATLANTIC AVENUE W ir E SOUTH COUNTY > w Z w S COURT < ¢ O a w DIGITALLONBASEE--MAPPING STGE DIVISION EM HOUSE 3 1. MAP REFERENCEy:LM692 I -- MARCH 2O03 -- Z > ■ a • z v) r al %. -af,/. 'N S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. , 8 \4 > —III . N II I a 1 t v, i,i ui _Li II 4*.i . —ley N 4j vi �; - N 1 ALLEY s . 1(//� _ .J <E<CIVIL nL::.iM1GS • I / _ ._._._.._ c:G-c'slx i LEE O1vIL.:r+.l:.1,42 hi N y -_-- —_ , ; 1 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: h _- ___.."�.� . _—FROPERTT'LNE -Ibs,a_^_ _-----_—_—_——_-. ... --\._. . U.'--CfrICE.CALOILATED•35 8PA^c5 FIR IPA eCi Pt•L464.1000106• 5124 OR o SPACES ;2 _ NEW b.WIDEITTPE' CONCRETE CURB .-EEE GI L DRAU11G5 I i -'-k' `t ... _ ( i — . TYPICALTE suaD've-- - -_. _ _ _ .._._._._- _._..__.. __._—.... c TOTAL SPACES MCLIIf D• 6 SPAC.c5I 'P'�CAETTc nLC.l STOP.TYPICAL• .1....__ I�I .� �, \ �.� PARKING SPACES PROVIDED• %, EXISTS..6000 PENCE TO REMANLO'REAR YARD SU..DSC.EETP-ACC LINE SP-I- i 1.- - �; STANDARD SPACES PROVIDED• 5 SPACES5i• I n .! G.^7'ACT SP."•."..ES PROVIDED• 0 SPACES i=i ' ._. _ I r: .. .._._ NANDICAF£ED SP/+ S PROVIDED• 15PACE -_.. -___ T I OPAL SPACES PROVIDED• 6 SPACES = NEW b'WIDEI FLU.Y 0/a14 uTE HEADER=RE.- �I / / \/ CAAL PP-4.1.4.56.TYPICAL 4HERE S...WI ---31 I 1 - ! r1 I r/ I NEW NTERiOCKIY PAVER DR VE I.L ti PROJECT DATA 1 I: :1 I ! C •-LT5Tm08CS FT. .-nz cP 817E 14D FLOOR AREA- __ _ SITE ,, 1 1 i I� ! o/ Opal LA1u+5CAr ED PWAGE- .-5F4¢'0 SQ Ff. 6354z OP 517E PAC\:_D DIRECTIONAL 6.16.E,TYPICAL—...- ._ _. - >,,-; l l I ly 'I \ L'Al R 6 6GDIE8- 0 60.FT. 6 Ofi.LF 811E 0 rI. ZONED: 1`'TU REAR TEPS TO 15E It'TREADS AND S21'RI RE r - N • `/ r �� / i ! OSSNAD• OLD SCHOOL f'a lei HISTORIC ARTS DISTRICTZ : NEW CAVE=J ENTRY EL9'EDIi,SEE ELEVATION'S-- •-- \ l IIp H/C Rt.'4-,t1A2a 5_'Cn A:.: __)4 E j •• v ss 1 ,ww.s-lrw uu - _ IrtA I.. 1 - w� (W10.1 FOUR(4)NEW COLVFN SUPPORTS) 1 - - C. n0 _�v,::: ` T. 'y3 m Z - t f r:// I I, j/// / Y 7 ..R.._R:..f PATH] I AD.. l /// i/ / / t `( I E CE`i�.L T,r".s E5) I_s a L=AL=Et:: \ �11 Q Z 1.=W ca: Ere LAh7BJ'..uRAl'S'rETPS To rcAA�NTRr. --- tr`r- g . p tj Rr EACKGF.D ALu.6.Wi r 0 '_ NEW ELECTR:G NEIEER(SERVICE/R1GCA ED TO 15 /•/ A/' i I/ // / / r i { I L.:_..t:G,•EN GATE CONCRETE Eu.ECALK ''LJ.•• 0 O C7 �: ,// , i/ / j I _ s ( ERE P..f4 FOK LOCAT;cHer I-Q ll// r/ / ,p_.(.-�E -1 - 1 _ I. REi.ECTORIZED ALU9 a:N z m W 1 I I it l •� ` /i%� / / S/ i/ ! ._ _11 _- uu1rE eAocr..•aro I.l cP.cnk LI- 3 I— / I I fl - __ ., R...ci.r.. -- ) TEXT U' bR.Ea C •R En .ALI EGTI I TEXT.:'TE E5`. VI / I - -- �G,i' ETRPE(TYP Cc T 3I /j�j j/ j%i ji / / j r e! e PEE I .A ruvRr rwE T- c ` 1 VA'•%A'EYEBGIT WRIT 1 //i //��a ;/ //;/ / 1 -- - ICI - v✓ Iu.�l:.rw Rcw u,w,r•.vs'lu'T,:�1 ea.T a M-,', .., _ .,%- - .I I `1 - _.. r ,OF IvL nVAC CCh[JE1JElW ETp. - .,/C WC W eLVE �W/wT emu.MO CONCRETE FAD j: - *//I u k sPcw •P OPACc — ws RCE 4 LOT 2 ; LI EXISTING 1—STORY I L ( II; � z: , LE, I'! ,. RESIDENC i LOTS �r ,.6. a Y O &i.Y / (cz rrl.•Pu:.FLfc 1 / / / I!L p �. i - TYr. • TTP.— ' rP. _'i ca.ca�r BASE D 1 m II) // / / / /. I I I, i 1 D 6.ra.lO CCIFOR•.ta. �� I- ff II•I / /i /- 11 to I _ RECONSTRUCT EXIST) FRONT ENrRT PORCH 1`.___ 11;/ // //• // / /ITii P..LM E2.4^...:A.Nr.FiO-ea1DA `� ?I (EEC FLOOR FLAN, EXISTSI'.VE PROPOSEC) I ii / / /� , / / ." I m ! p�/r %j r � / j%� iW 2 DISABLED SIGNAGE 3� t 1 l/ ./ o TYPICAL PARKING DETAIL I �� w„ ' /I I // %% // j ;1 j I ! rcr To r..A:.E A10 ern To seALE ASA V,z"1 / / L h ---\-.- '-t -'1--- / ,. _ - f` 1. -1 R WAIN . i'l R'_"1-kJ VE CTIGN of DAl•uv_.,LLJOD FE�.cE!- T--7 t 1 1 j` It ��/ 1 z U, Q i II� r �rovE- r a'-m•OF ExurNG r AG6 -i M1l I - I i/ /4 /t �--.. -.-t.— _ __ ..._ P.I i..EXI Tlio P.^.RCH LL NEW INTER5OCKin PAYER WALKWAY 4 ENTRYE-0RGH / - 1 -- /' _I�-- -- I... C—6.26:IN E•v-C,Cv...P.->KRI.::Lw = E d T q� p NEW NTE IGCXIK•PAVER DPovE--- ...• i I 1 SITI y. -I I _.. - fT�' •. `'1'/• , I PT I ON ` 3 _ 4. - • I h_. -� �,' I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: } RS'IOT£EXISTS/_CONCRETE DRIVEWAY IN iT,E(TI1ETY -�--- ! ")l 1 • 0 Q l 1 I I r (45 PROVIDED EY THE OWER) O W t 1 1 ' 1 1 /- LOT 3 Cr 5._OCK 6T,•TOUR O=DELRAY.OLD SCHOOL_F..A'T£HISTORIC DISTRICT' c 1 ••-"^3it -�'THE .1.-5O..K FADE 3 Cr THE f i \\ I �. Pu_,LIO RECORDS CF PALM LEACH COwi.,FLORIDA. ....: , I I ----IIII --- 1 ,.,.-_-„:..,w..,.Ici:Er rE.•(cE(h.FOEib AT EA.^w+SIDE G DRIVE .I . \ ` I i . I 'l l I S PROJECT E ; 1 zI T NORTH _ . —_�r� ----- I, --- -- ------ --- /-- I \ 'r 'i 1 LPE�Ir LVE >L I 1 J— —�-- \ EwST24 i.^.O1vCF£TE EIDE:L:LK TO EJ N--I -a - I I I --- -I I I I [� /j/ �C�• EwsrNC-.LANDSCAPED R014'TO R£1AI42_ -+. _.--_.....� / \ .. / r _ T I 4a oa r•. Cra E6T9ii S.CONCRETE 011iJ TO cTA01.------\ Ri4Vn w • EwETNG-CONCRETE C«O•E.^,,,'r 4 APRON TO PST-TAN W Project No. 2CO2.30 CAC File No. ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN cA-2_=t.E III i Data : • "�-;VS'.1'-.a' `..I. '1,2003 - Drawing Na. CwST24 52'LIDE ASPHALT ROAD TO REI"L:N - _... q---NORTI--I -SUJINTON V N . (OW RCF-R.CF-15.412 © COPE A.RCHIIECTS. INC..2003 - I a I I t; I - I 1 1_, _ 13 ,_a1 1 -..� E,s.,,C.K....r.:3.•o = of - -- 1 1 ` 1r: t1 I7 1' :qR I! I ? I / , NEW CUPOLA W/LOUVERED( -NING AT REAR ENTRY h 1 i/ EXISTING CONCRETE TILE ROOF TO REMAIN •-- I ti —1 5 TO MATCH EXISTING SLOPE(FIELD VERIFY) ` 12 5 MATCH EXISTING(MELD VERIFY) ^`�f I:� �� _ �® T f 'OT"tN DECORATIVE CIR AR VENT TO VAULTED PORCH �'f�'// ' 1 i '---• ' 'sf • '-' L �' V- ELEVTL.-H'-b'(FIELD VERIFY) I'�_ I-. --- BEA RING PONT OF NEW RAFTERS 1.; I— I a>. + NEW SINGLE I.U4 ALUMINUM WINDOW TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS -) I • I -I ' r ._1 , I r N�T -NEW COPPER COACH LKaHT TO MATCH FRGN7 PORCH EXISTING IX CORNER BOARD TO REMAIN I-- —•—tom I I I J t �' ic jI _--_ r-.. ._—( L_ I'- I NEW WOOD ENTRY DOOR AND SIDELIGHT AS SPECIFIED - EXISTING WOOD CLAPBOARD SIDING TO REMAIN- - - f i— >-- __ �— — —I I I 1 ('F'rcLLA•IMPACT RESISTANT TO MATCH FRONT) _ I , i - � . ._ 'J I jr � � �' ! ! :I!! l „_-:!:EXISTING CONCRETE FOUNDATION TO BE EXPOSED I 11 , *'�G, � , i- • • • i -I I: ♦ FIN.FLR ELEvNI. -2211' L I I II I II I I j.1 II I ✓f a `�: 'r�'� , _ a _ APPROX TOP OF EXISTING FLOOR EASTELEVATION PC.I1.9D CONCRETE RAMP/LAN/DING/STEPS AND REAR PORCH �„ H/C • YAI F:1/4'•1.-0' N '° 171 I 1' -,-----• -ter- I 3 • � -- I -= .LOPES'-5' / 5-9� _ ___ ' MY V47 FL� I I I CD ! I IT-J Y Y YT—Yr Y Y Y Y,: L _ .1 . J L YIL - ['FP, Z Ln Ir—n---1 --1* r-Ch ---:----- ., i I 1 1 —--— ! I 1Cli II{{{I J O - - — � ` mZ2 > _ - - - - - -0 — _I $,t I Z - W h I / li�P II 'I +' I, �°. `>t —. .. .... ... ... - _� �FP1 FLR ELEVt1..22.11PG FLOOR — OF0 � tl I _ I 0 _ f _ ___. I I_ IAF'PROX TOP OF EXIST 3 m O y �-1 II'-2. f I -- i II'-I' - LL_ Y : N< re FOYER /M OFFICE 4 _ L COPIES Q Z W J I— I l v I 4 = 7 X _ y I ® NORTH ELEVATION ,� w / r 4 ` ^ �6. Arel F:V4'.I'-0' '�.. /y�, g h { I .� �� v 1L I I 11 PI • Z N I � CLOSET STORAGE � 'rr ' _ _r _ _. _ _ m n /�•��. I!-" �� • t I _ -- �{ — �t NEW 31NOLE HONG WOOD WiNDCW TO MATCH DUSTING CONDITIONS p F I I ` ... ..,.. T 1__ 1 1 '�I _...�II I - ! iI '—(-. .I I'. TYP.•s FRONT ONLY('FELLA'IMPACT RESISTANT) UI M g 1- • _ _ - ._ _— _— I 1 I , 1 I ' i I 1= I�- — _[--1-f NEW P RTY WOOD(HOILNPICKET FENCE 2'REMOVED FROM FRONT (W�,Q a IIHIGH "� - PROFERn L WE[SHOLL.N FOR CLARIn) \-J 2< �' ' r I ---II ( ._1 — j Khoo+( I -i -- fliIhui-ff-iiL 0I2. II;II I I• �• I0 __ I FIN.FLR ELEVTL.-2:.1IrI �a —� _ iI...LH _IPJIZI' I_1�1 � =W-cab L O ` ' / / I! I I APPROX.70P OF EX 5'�5l�l. sx j \ NEW SINGLE FLING WOOD WINDOW(AND ENTRY DOOR)TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS < i �` - . -• O - TYP.•o FRONT ONLY('PELLA'IMPACT RESISTANT) 0 W i• 0 _ :' 0 ' / i V 0 �;THR.0011' / ,,,,,,,,,,, WEST ELEVATION �I' !=-_' X / % — — -- — R-ALP:V4'••1'-0' I. 0!//%///H//////H/////A LS///////////////////// .'I>- L--- --_1 \® — — —� \ I _I-REMELT' SLOPE:MPL VW/FT. COVERED - SLOPE �' I ENTRANCE I <MIK v4/Fi _.___. _ _ \\\ I :PORCH= 'Tl---Y" .R---u _ Y 1. _---r-• I-_" - L I. L _ \ ___ O � - ❑( LINE OF EXISTING PORCH �� � . ~t o o I I I'j I -I( — 1 1 I' I o D - -- I --- _ '--LINE OF NEW E TENDED PORCH I I.!' III_J II'P :I I I I I I o` - -- - - - _ 1111 11_1 — 1 i ri,;rtLI I I o NEW BRICK PAVER WALK —II �� o E p /� II--�I � I Lip I il, '--� / PROJECT _--- - I I !� i1,`�9 Q _ Drawn IkI II —r__—_ FIN.FLR ELEVTL.-22.11' RAC -I' AF'PROX TOP CF EXISTING FLOOR NORTH 1 I I S 1 i� .3 1 1 1 Project No. F 2002.30 ARCHITECTURAL FLO R PLAN �CA`le N°; D_FILE F/"AI F:V16'•I._0. - Date • ' Drawing No. SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/4'•1'-0' A 2.0 ti W - © COPE ARCHITECTS,INC.,2003 .b.:�.�Of GM of 1 2 I 3 I 4 I I I I 1I.; i1 I 1'[ I 13 4 • EMI S -a ____.,.. orOJn1�'IfN!1�i,v iiii EW0IEIEA J.o,Si --- a _- __— K/r1 It _rtuwK rcm hHwaKwp sai P�r'- �+ i .ati u— :' — _\\ uEaas 1.- .,A aJaEEN oNPIMQf _ --- - II+r � ! ` y :.axe 0. a ({'Cp,Gj 1. !'IWF'E ///, MAS a.Rap 1. In fit+'' 4 irjr."---'..%:\::6811:1••l::::: : r MOO Px ti I .1? d / ATLANTIC A VITAE' RAIVICAR ft:—...:::...... . .....::::::..: '. ':'; No a�L 6 r•.E LOCATION MAP 4 t :'. 10 / adaLn L�WCR.Pt ::`.. :. . ': nAd:;:: / '`_ . _^ — nEsc ZPTI a N aua mum- .'-r A. q„,�„ABET "— Lar 3 BLOCK 67, TOWN OF L1NTW MOW DELRAY y •� cwKyu�yy bwe r0[ r-4' I le-Er I I ,x-o� I gMEACCID..DACLA V0,S TO TIE PLAT THEREOF AS Al FAK 2 -K2C 9,PUBLIC F ST�J VN RECORDS OF BEACH PLAT DIEM STY, FLORIDA NO IMEW lII SHALL BE CO HIROCTa A4EOIJOE pE�K ., . ..ROVE r PROJECT 9' C-0' ?. r-r ,r-a' r-o' .K, p�Eq ypR7�6,1�0E T M 171 N. 5'AANTON RENOVATION! �� >. I LpO ° 'E :, A SITE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS DEWY Bmit FLORIDA - L o=PACT EfC*, LOT EA la 10.LIE't SQUARE FEET AX NAM PO Ws II FURJY RAMP AREA a' T-ate�� B/J1LDING& PORCHES We FT. MINFT DRIVE, WALKS 6 PARKING 4,373 SC. FT. 797$ FT. SECTION A-A OPEN SPACE 3891 Sit FT. 7,515 SC.Fr, I T To wax TOTAL INPERVWUS AREA 6,131 SR FT. p,5p6 SOFT. TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA 3,891 5d. FT. 7,515 SG FT: CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON DETAIL TYPICAL PARKING SPACES DETAIL c k. 0.6Y8 c., a.37s .• SHEET CONTENT SITE DRAINAGE CRITERIAI RETAIN THE RUNOFF FRON A LINE-HOUR, THREE-YEAR STORM EVENT, GRADING-PAVING-DRAINAGE MIC AMMO BAIL WAVE RAOUL=MENOITER FOR TIE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PRE-DEVELOPMENT LAL VALAIS AND POST DEVELOPMENT CO1VDITIDN.0 THE L COTE I T,PE L,SIMER C PPE,OPPJL .� r APE NAME CALryx er aeltP roc L Ex vat 4u Ill Ii'I le II NIA •• BTNOJT mom I�32' Ia V-NC PINE T I V-10,021 X f3.2/12X11626 - Lt375? - 676 CLEFT. BLEEa 14 RETENTION VOLUME PROVIDED. REVISIONS 330' _ma_ .•„ yY� _ SWALE ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE, V-1/2H31 X 11 X LW = 720 CILFT. /° f4'RA/ 1 rn+ • j j .-...1 .J &I ,2t3 IpjE /� Mill -MD i rr atvE ,,/ /,* 2 J i - -IJr GCE.. - . ,� i arK,r K r lnl ///2/ is J 131,0' - Z //: >•lalllBl�► cow.PAo riB�IT.` imam /// - / i A' r an.e.our m OW ,, e::/v ` X-SECTILW A-A �� N. - .r-r ®--*—+ E g + q< u i w Y_71 r 1H. AO SOVl' j/ I It J ' rMA1N*'PaK°'I' '' mill. we�a MaApV / �� i�l ye eau A e1 noL %�j ��/j, In ti"' +z1.D��PANDA,m $ �,° .gym . �' LEGEND Ipil I agitakeiM_ 1 �/ PE SUPPORT tlETAR +811 _ •� c lj Ir, / C - r, i, r.. .r. ,, /.,�• !.ARMS WOE RPM SIALL EE IMAM OE TR!L'=PPM CHM . / / M J•AV�D svAEc-or JiETAR FLIAJd IJAAare taw j�% m ALL CLAM cam MAIL pa Kam arm RCA HUM DIRECTION Cr ...--4--... /�// �/I 'N —;_____1___ -- /. a P al eoi E atUZIN Kt'�+a 7E1ri aLw SG2FACE RIAYOFFSEAL jj� ,` .a - +2o,R 131.0 +2sv i REDUCED PRESSURE ZONE SACKFLOW PREVENITR PW 10.2 POLE LIGHT Q 8 ;H ct +2a4 t206 j//ji 330' •^OW. L A N A VIIIES-IRE MAN SITE P rar..4.RCM OMR NOTES SCALE' I '=2 0' ooNC.NAM -PAnE,r Pr MEL 1-,/r SLAM=EDO NUM=OAK DATE 1. SURVEY DATA BY BATTAGUI LAND SURVEYORS. INC. rx>w='"'a 2. ELEVATIONS BASED UPON N.G.V.D. 1921. 3. ALL WORK III ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF DELRAY BEACH STANDARDS k SPECIFICATIONS ❑ ISSUED FOR il 4. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY SUNSHINE FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.46 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. B7 REVIEW 4 COMME ' S PHONE# 1-800-432-4770 ❑ BIDDING . 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM All.WORK'WITHIN ROAD RAW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE KTS ❑ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION S= OF FLORIDA 'MANUAL ON TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SAFE PRACTICES' FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY ❑ PERMIT 1il CONSTRUCTION, AS ADOPTED BY FLORIDA D.O.T.SPECIFICATION. LATEST EDITION. ❑ CONSTRUCTION - S: 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK FOR = T r AFT r iral ni r ll 7 i4 n Flit RUCTION MEETING. 7. A PCONTAACTOR�SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER LS ANY EXISTING ISSUE DATE 1/14/03 DISCREPANCY WITH DRAWINGS. 6. SEE ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN FOR LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. PROJECT SHEET NUMBER CONCRETE PAVER SIDEWALK NUMBER KS 1 .. t 1 ---- -----) . . I I i NOTE: • 1 LUMINARE HEIGHT. + LUMINAIRE- SPRING CITY ELECTRICAL MFG. CO. 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 5 FT.(+/-)LUM N E OVERALL MOUNTING HE G „:0. ° _ POLE ASSEMBLY TO BE RATED FOR 120 MPH VIAND �- CATALOGUE No.: WASHINGTON-FXB330-HS WITH REQUIRED GUST FACTOR. .1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.3 e -0 5' 1-t(- 0 7-41.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 I 'n 7-0 7' 1-11r A4 . SA CONCRETE DIRECT BURIAL POLE. AMERON Co. VICTORIAN SERIES: 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 C.,8 CATALOG#VER-4(413) WITH T5 MODIFIED TENON. - • {�- COLOR: 413 WITH ARCHITECTURAL 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 'U.ti U.O./ C.6 e SA ACRYLIC COATING. e 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 C.8 iv 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 /1) 8 .7 U./ 0./ 0.9 BROOKS BOX 1419 SERIES(14.25'x19.50') HANDHOLE FLUSH WITH GRADE. BOX SHALL BE SET IN PEA GRAVEL AND LEVEL PROVIDE A ` 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 1 3 �. WATERPROOF JUNCTION BOX FOR SPLICES. • d 4•4 Q Q Q Q #6 GROUND Q7Ga. w 1 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 1:6" 0.7-0.9' 0.9' BO D.TO POLE �aieisaa GRADE ��= J ..$ $ -IEI1' 011 I II :IEr WO 0 F IEI I �ll -II all'I.' aI r oz.- m a $ I��1,-,, �I`1'C. TO NEXT BROOKS 1z� < z W -.1 Z r.5 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 �_..7,H, F u-�= �r �u6-w v S4 -_ '` I III• I r BOX. PROVIDE 200LB. > 5/8'DIA. x 8'-0'L. '1'C I1 I PULL STRING ..'.I-aa� S D. W 00 3tQ i= 0.6 0.7 ❑ r COPPER-CLAD GROUND ROD Ell= 11 1 1'PVC CONDUIT cro o S N N z E - - I 11- WITH BOND WIRE N�� u S 2 _ zo:� mr 0.6 0.6glid? BASE TO BE PLACED IN PROPERLY r co1°� z 0 i so EXCAVETED HOLE &BACKFILLED I° el //42. TO COMPACTION OF 1200 P.S.F. ! I' F° M 00.6DIRECT BURIAL POLE DETAIL 1U \ NT.S (CITY OF DELRAY BEACH LIGHTING STANDARD) /Q 0.8 0.7 EDET064 // ILIIJll 0.9 0.8j %[ o,ZU $1ti ° EXISTING 1 -STORY/ Ilitilill-( -5 Y 09 08 RESIDENCE % • :i / Yi.y./.e.pp/jq Q/DSW4./1s. a - 1 1 (En57WG FIN.FLR.0 728s') �yrrr wr.rrrrr.......or.. F 2 1617DIA ......�r..�r.rwrr.i• to 0.6 F ... .rs.gr.,rr- y� a 0.9 0.7 I H ^ s • :i- A ( ==;) A I Ak 1- 0 r=1 F-1 0.6 0.7 IDUNARESPECFICAT%MS a SH ��` ///����y IIIIII!I I(�IQ(�f::� 'jj0��lll'llllll IAuuvcroxcswc-u weEnmFwx Zi HEMP SS VW P:1 E_I MTH. 16 LT DANDER O � 0.5 0.7 0.6 LIAIERWL XiP�ECE CAST F1WJ.t01 ALLOY 5P719PERA5.TY82695 U g 0 O DIP/ESE.CAST IRON PERAS.TYA/313 V SS3I �. GLOBE: STPPIIDPoLYCARSOIv1TE 0 Z Y 381/16• F4JSN PRLSIE PANT THEN FPESE SHERMIN PALMAS ACROLON•PI FACE AUSISECCLER 1-( 0.8 0.8 0. IAORII& 1}5 WAIT DHPs T6us1 DIN DNCDDTHER (4( 1: vauce Axor4cmDmouoDauAo -(- SOCKET: QIIDWu 81SE )0110G1.48ASE COMER C1 O � 3 E 0.9 .7 MOTO CONTROL GPTIauL-DJITON TYPE r, W 1-1 0.9 0.8 0.7 M O CC X N 0.7 0 6 O. . itili Q A J ctSpring City Electrical Mfg. Co. W 0 •Mo I4llANDIANSTPEETS•P.O.BOX 19•SPRNGCRY•PA19325 Plot Dote: 02-04-03 0 TOACCFPTA3 L7 DIAX3'HIGR TENON Ed ADDRESS�4�j� �� !! PA@iE(610)S:&U00 FAAISIOIS85511 Xrel s 93013PHOTOMETRIC 1 NI Cadd File: 03013SP-1 DESCRIPTION 606 330 PDF p Design By: MDT Drawn By MDT CM O / \ Checked By. MDT/DET Date Issued: 02-04-03 3 Luminaire Schedule Scale: 1/8'= 1'-0' Project: 03013 - POWER MORTGAGE SITE PHOTOMETRICS Sheet: j a Label Qty Description Filename Lumens LLF Total Watts SITE LO SA 3 WESTERN LIGHTING- FXB330-HS- 175W MH- TYPE III- MTG HT 15.5FT AFF FXB-330-T-3.ies 14000 0.720 200 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN I! 5FTx5FT PHOTOMETRIC GRID 03013 - POWER MORTGAGE SITE PHOTOMETRICS Average = 0.73 SOI M Maximum = 1.0 .--1 0 Minimum = 0.5 M O Avg/Min Ratio = 1.46 F- Max/Min Ratio = 2.00 PLANT LI5T . - I I K Y OTY PANT AND E -CIFIC.4711:214 '/ //��"� • �� / Y 3D AND PALMS I .V . -// .t -- —LIt� T6bD'—_ q ' /' Ar/ , AlI _ ,/ a. (79 ���i�(// yy = J-I N Ov 5 Gt�rcue virglnlana(LIYr OaiJ A. GRANT \'�a11y�\011�� I I 1 ��1��!a�� � J'� opy P'nt 6'.pr.full ranelp THORNBROUGH k ♦ " _ PR 1 Plumerla Room(rrertglpenf) , �- - F S 'mhos aro(5olitalra Palm) ` � 4 ,�I ,,. 19'nt full canopy AND ASSOCIATES , �`.� 14-16'oa its hoevy 0 _ _ _ ' __-- !•(__-- Atli] ALL DEAD Ak7 NJURD BRANG£5 SHALL BE PRUNED%1TH C1EA;J CUn9 • }'EY OTT PLAhrf AND SFr'..rIGATION • r el ®� I -' I AFTER PLANIIILG.A11 CUTS OYc"ii SFir7J96,rsROLNDC.OYERB.W.J, ACCENTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS .y._._._.— _:_._� a 2•D41.SHALL BE PANTED. AND LAND PLANNERS �,� 14 a " ALL TAGS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER ALP 6 A,pinla purpwdta(Red(sinew) / PEAL LANDSCAPE APPROVAL. 24'ht.,24'son,full pin..and red I e I'I'lpi ; J SRD 15 Srame,lade spp.(Mixad Hromelladea) 132 North Swinton Avenue [ Ii i10-16'►pr,varieties par ownerD Norlray Batch, nF v ruo,d [jy --•-��, S-WFLLNGTON TAPE OR EQUALCAT 5Chamaadoresa cataractos!Cot Pahl) .1 ---_ ,� _I >U �) SHALLBEUSEDTOSECi1RE31r iC.30'spr,NIl44 (561)276-5050 ,,, �s__—A [t_-_ 1 err .1 ` TREES.USE AMPLE LA.,'^T S TO N CFfR 14 obalan»icaco! l.m) FAX(591)276-6777 Al`''V'="`` .�"' ''i / /,. ``, IT ',, Taus SHALLR BE SEET SO AASST S 2s'M,24'.pr.full,2'e . _ p /`� I ' ` NOT 70 WERE BRAI*0RT*G HART. C(J7. lz CocEaeum varlogata(Croton),�'``r'1,`"``/ t3?.J BVIE£a..000aYa PALER DRIVE / '�'� 20' 20'a full,mixed varieties L.& 1 � 1I-\ 1 3'SHREDDED MULCH HOUND EARTH TO FORM ViATERE S SAUCER. M+ Fr• per`�, '�`r.- - i �) ' ' (a'CLEAR OF TRUNKI.L . _ • FRIAI GRADE moms 16151<SHALL 6E GOR 3 Cordyllne terminalls(i:a_alian Ti Plant) • ', Jai- IME SAYE AS NURSERY GRADE 9-4'MR,full,mixed variance Ai i APPROVED �'( / �!/�� `A 1 A �' N GRot Urx 7a' 1 ::.. l GRI -I Gi asIa;` Lily) �� of r '''-.1,i SOIL.THEN WATE TR HOROUGL HLY' >' �� �1�YQ�® /tit- ,' " N NAM 1 Hamatla patens'compacts'(Duerr Piraeuah) `� / ' REMOVE BURLAP FROM \ COMPLETE BACKFILL AFTER WATE BIAS. 14'tit,24'apr,full �,� , ©nL' /I�) rL TOP OF ROOTBALL. �.(•COMPACTED TQ'SDL SASE. DQ•1 60 Ixora Nora Grant'(Putt lxora) 11 / Zl, Oe� [ PLANTN3 AND STAiONCO DETAIL-TO 6'GEL 10'F 2D'spr.full,1'cc. v ��-- JA5 46 Jaam,16 v°lubila(Wax Jasmine) / - 1 aralliRt�% '101,'i 12'tit,16'-apr,2'to H`A '1I r47IL �eIL It '! i N AEP 2ID7 TJeptrolepts exalts(Sword Fern) xr.c, ? / /`�l, 0��� I j , � PAS 2 P- MK,ra 0000lr a(Red Pence Ylro) < >.-� ` I ' -�� 1 3 27L(•h®D-BOARDS ON DETAIL A ' WRAP TRIM WITH BURLAP 3�1 J MILE MITER ENDS.SET tk,run vMe,.sttaoh to farce tea. , / � / I.YXi(Y BOARDS- 12D DP_GR S APART `� FLU 52 P4�ba Imperial BWa'CHlue Mu:Node& �'I I JJ A r M ARoum TRUNK. ��_ 16't t apr,full,2'or- _ _ . '',I %RAP 2-METAL BANOS 1 2'X4'XEE DFAt1MAN POL 95 PokJpodtum scolopendria lULsrt Rim) v / y�l r��� ' 1 TO SECURE BOARDS / a 12'Th rC,c sprp,full,2'or, DNQ: •- :i ` MOU.D EARTH TO FORM WATERAG SAUCER. TFE 61 TFm)rioorgis.recta(Kirg's Manila) I.... _..- - 1 Y s iEDDm YULGr 51 FNAL GRADE AROL FORM IVA SHALL BE 24'tn.20'• r,fWL 10'or.. ;:.1 / + - �Y�` •\1`.♦ \ !��_S� /q W-CLEAR DF TR,, N 2A"1 3 Zamto pumild r,fulL a) ,l ` ` � /. `` /� `THE SAI¢AS NURSERY GRADE I "��!� ��` � ''- . " �' yTagy� .'`SEE DETAIL A ABOVE 18'it,24'apr.full �> �+;yy ` \tom :,Y/ f �' : ��`�,��l��A\`• y`:\�•� %� T."n�•,.- N DENOTES NATIVE SPECIE. BAGffLLL WITH CLEAN SOL OR L'I� ',` Q 1 _ads SAND AND WATER TFKh OLGELY. NOTES ' *�. \\� ',� PL a3yT aY AND STAF:1N!DETAIL- PALMS A11 plan material to be Florida 4 or batter. P�,.,\I /1 X NATURAL roc PAIN I 1�� / /; Sod to be A.glhil BE Fl.Drafa2',0An;racor to c(<.antre CT:l0Rttty. /� All sod and to receive rex covers trots d e otic irrl taco tan�(✓ ok ; RE�7JbE C�L�TIOt1 w e I ��r�I'V�i-A Q h3 approved 9s 9a y.,'" (6'Nt tuDODC3 rl:IeT rL11Ce) ,f `�' us oved tea aarce. i o EXISTING 1-STOt'2Y�w ir 1kz ;;; Inky-CI 0 O+ O+ p t Ilk tan andr7 a au ore shconditlas and landscape alas tt:auats attax6d to Tice leaf Itat flan and Iticdt ore stall be corteldsed Con trac:I>oarnscts �, 3 ` i E5I D NG>= �' !�` w O+ + 0 O+ Kdeit,topaoll and fatllize'to be applied according to specifications. t.l //1 �� / SPECIFICATIONS , \ 0 , . Ic' TYPICAL LAYDUT AL=FOR MATURE PLANT SPREAD V a SCALD: 1IS'=I'-Ia° , 61 0 I I �1/ BETWEEN SOD AND/OR PAVES t pt$1.L.TUR-c All plant ratslal teed shall be ins to rare and SICE in conformity': 1 O A `� i / ,. Ma 2'APPROVED PLANTED SOL with the Florida NrBeryran'a Grades and Standards,and emit be Flo ida Grade 1 or better. !_OT 2 ; l 0: 1"' SOT t D"TOP 6'OF EOSINS SDL Plants Uk-Ch do rot meet opt lficattola will rot be accepted �' 4J R:J PLANT LISTS: Cuanitlea,sizes,and location of ants tall ba detelrmirea plan and plant lists. �' /1 u © J I ;-�itlri i'=: '!!#riN_= , ROOTER cLrrnNGs OR plant P'• ground�^J m WAX / �. J I scars Size l tL ld aerdkt�arot(� lard ts aroma bet edS sate gatde7r s a tube tr �j /, T" ' �w� ' I PLAN71ACs DETAIL- CoRDUNDCOVER5 / q �� �,- /'I rsspamble for vaniFratton a e^tasl ouan ties call d for on piece piuxeparcles si a d be , �,----- 1 r J I i 4 e 1 �� ��I Oro gt io i}e aiierdlon of for hall bernecepted L , \4 , r�nsTn,+ TO ray.iN S.E51111nla�x SO elbetItotbna shall be a te:f without consent of Landscape Architect roc.mica 4a,N �` M . / �� '.'WI M IrI> led si stltuttens shall be detailed on this bid —�' i? s ��1f►' • .."• —j 1' ,� `�.;t PLAYTaY SOIL:Topsoil shall be clean eterlr,and free of debris other foreign a idea loL r��, •k%� Lin <:.§p To'- �A- � /,' '� Trees and palm du be Ur t with a minor 8' tl(5Dk « - _ .W:• . .�`.. r PLANE SHALL BE Rf3f0YID FROM Pa {OPaO /' ��' `., •`��O.�y_ ' ° ° ° a��\�-Am- j v r J, �, ALLow FOR MATIAE PLANT SPREAD CONTAliER SO AS NOT TO SR:AK and bottom of ball Root cttkga shall be plartled h with mh of S of iopaoll Ili • `,-,`�`\` " SEWED!T2froxNr sPECN� OR osruLe ROOT BALL LofF9d kin.the 6'of exit Boll �: �7 1 f \ 1/ �4�•�vA t,1�,�-a V^ 0 SOD AND PAVES MEAD EARTH TO FORM WATfREu SAUCER. ftt(IILI 2f2 Patin and Tropical fertilizer(i2 rrl)Or Quad ecjal shall be applied after pia LUrc� i���1 1� w:..:L INt€ PA�F '.K `,r• -c^: m.-�� appr `` r- ..�� RNK GRADE AROUND TRLlrK SHALL BE and prior to mulching per msruFact;rsa recofinerdedepplTrationratea. 'di , `, ! CD !Ys+y-1 '` � Mr SIWE n Late+ Tie SAME AS Ia NOERY GRADE- l'GJ-Ci- All tress shall be ulOnsd with 3'of approved aheddxl mach in a 3 Foot dta.circle.All shtbs i rsti1 t ; i % + A .� r�7 r 1, -- and ro r drove beds shall be.mulched with 3'or cued en d lculdl hi bade doll on plan cr In ttei `. IMrF_PR11.AD + _ / ``` kW.-/u��I✓' * 1� - ..:�^: _ FLLL]WITHAPPROVEDPLMfTtw: g m s \ vs `���� ,�'1�a ��' SOL THEN WATER THOROLG .T. beds 3'wide for hedge&11;ch1 aha:ld be Grade'A'inlets orthslass approved MOOTING POIYs11 f 1 ` • a �i, 1itxDYE BURLAP FROM 1._ t ` ♦ 1 LOP "1� �0pN .•,�1Of 4✓ TW OF A00T&t L i_[ ,-'...-- COMPLETE BACKFLL AFTER WATERING PlAiff.a Pf EDURE:All plants shall be planted at soli levels at ditch they were prevloualy gran PROJECT ' , 'u ,`.. I 6.► ,, 'L, ; ,�.•`•:,fi'.�i; �,� L�'r 4'COMPACTED TOFSCIL BASE StrLb and hedge material shall be planteda min 2'acay from walls or other rkairLctfons.Material ss '�tt` ; ��, a `. �ti3Jt1+ L with a mature she -eater than svehar shall be land ea from S0 as not to ;. ' ,f7CcnTs3;s PONGN•t �` 0.7V41 ` � T FLANTtNG DETAIL- CONTAINER SL.rRL�S inpede the nattragg habit. CJ'a P y In iGEMISH Orr-ICE BUILDING 1 ♦ 1 :4 i� /, I Sabel Palm are to be plaited d directly M tarot IF(t eaaary,excavate ® ,ilitV�F �I►\T° 1 �ELOCATED �\ ��'. ©'Tat/ ` 4 �i7t1�`c though any roe . .,-i ballot g ad ado to uldbtu, sot and Want oral platting soil �A �%���'� \ `�`' i� �1 (0I0f' 1<1 WATERRYx All plant materal stall be catered to thorou after installation to as ID remove all air podsts. 131 N. SWINTON AVENUE An i�!>'!►I l i r \• o�i f)i S 1 1 13t5 r(atartal shall be watered every day for a alnico ore se pabd and thereafter to as to DELRAY BEACH,FL tx er+;LAFDeCi PBYw �' tw` ik�� _�`I `r �`,' TeD 3 iraioi ww PIeKET F E tantlea moist udU rdial or the lancets /retaliation Corer Acta shall notify other+ �' '1 1 l y �r 1 �'�A��` cr other(at> regmreaeds of installation. Ps ry DOEFSAeM.FIE30 UMW r• la+ '� " L . �, _.I TO PErtfIN, er11L::All trees 8'or taller shall be guyed or staked to provide&pls suport etch that the material TITLE • 1 will stay straight.and true though the guarantee period tls.hods teed will be each that no kIIry Is Id/ /1/f _ I --—- _ -1�11_2V__//_f_/-�./_/ L 1 L 1 cat zed to pla(1a shall be cleric at the option.or the C nitl.or In!ws epeclrlcally requseied try I— i ti i , 1 r� 1. I ;; the Larderapa Ai Mweva,Eel ra"or Mall e:N be respormroe For all tress arc/pa4ro rasa/tg LANDSCAPE PLAN ````\ 52011 Ni collcl i€gyrl ALK to eeTAD* h`'\ I1 LANDSCAPE CALLS straight and true thoughvit the guarantee period �`, y I N. PAD:Sod shall be dense,great,and well rooted,and free or debris,weds,obJectlaubla graces, w _ ... f `, A TOTAL.LOT AREA 1Op71 Ea FT. disease,or tlilurloss Insects.A complete 6-6-6 Fertilizer shall be spread at a rate of 5 ba per IS00 sq.ft ,i_JI eco i `_--- s 6TraJCT ame,naRpNs W.L 1C ATm DwVEa PM 6J51 6c1 PT. Sod shall be wateed to a depth of 4'arts laying.Al areas to be sodded shall be raked arooth and 1%cteTRiG LAti�CAPeYs 0 i \ DOD I` C. TOTAL PURA1S Lac ARCA 0(4e) sew to.PO all debris removed prior to hstallatlOn D. AARA OF EA•Ift i5 AND G.605 D D COVER RECOR 0. 9(0 x 04 L161 ea.FT. GUARANTEE:All plant materials shall be guarentesd for I year after conppletlon of project PRDJ.No. \ -, % 5 Ara OP 6F 9 AND V PR: OT 0 a D 166 6 FT. Palm are to be guaranntaed foci Ljsar.Guarantee applies to health po ttion,and eke.Raplaclsrt L-1 FILE gam V • F. NATIvE VEC TATION REGJ1K'CD P-ED Il 26) 2'a2 ea.PO Coat will be carried by Contractor. A1.)F/$G1-4 DRAIN --'j G. NATIVE VEGETATION FRONDED 1084 60.fT. N. TOTAL.PAVED VEHICULAR YEE AWA 3556 ed.PT- 2/10/03 DAT1= L TOTAL.NIERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA TEOU,f•.>:D I•(N X JO) 363 EC-Fr. set—. T0T4L aRERGR LANDSCAPE AREA PFDVIDED 4EO 6GL FT. RT- SW( T AVENUE K. Total.INTERIOR%ADD TREED leOMIRwD IC41/125 6.F./ 3 IWZED L. TOTAL NTERLOR EA-LADE 11*E._6 PROVIDED 3 TREED M. TOTAL LMISARIRET eupeRo h'PRG PAACR4 OK *AD LP. VE+41r'r'1+P U1B ARE. N. TOTA.1301DER OF PEKE-EMIR 1TR�E5 Fe-OIJeR`D N.RI/30) 2 TWE E6 0. TOTAL IAD'DE R OF FERE- IER TREES PROVIDED 2 TREED . Si-EET r. TOTAL N.3•rr. OFT 6 To CZ 8.4%v."D CF BITE 3 TE.5 __—_—_—_—_---_---_�i._---(66'RG --ILA7)--_---_—_—_---_—_—_—_—_—_—_---_—a TOTw N.-meR OF NG7NE-1-6 36 JIRTO C.(K•tOA Se 5 TW..-E2 -1 -r.. R TOTAL 1.11•15D2 OF NATIVE TRADES PROVIDED i T'«" _ e. TOTAL N."r,., OP T4-s.-6 ON PLAN F6r0VlDED 9 11, 1 ATG 5 PROPERTYLIE-*SO' IFAAGATION LEGEND 1- + - - -- — — — — — L ROTOR NERDS A. GRANT O O OE RA 11-10Pu+wwTORL�aLrn THORNBROUGH , "E"`-, AND ASSOCIATES MI , -WU 4 O4wFR CIRCLE .. .. _ - O O O O RAlb60 R-60 POP-LP ROTOR WADS NUL ILE TALLOW wrrn c` IMACEATION NOTES. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS _ -Rif.C -RREE.G-01RIR 4 WIF C= AND LAND PLANNERS I —------- - - - - - - -- -WIRIER c6GLE L TIE CGORACIGR tl R ESFgb MAIEIE FOR ALL IERIAL R 0JPED TO MAKE ILE ETbTEM ❑o ❑o Oo ❑O RANBIRD T'ELISP 4'PCP-UP�02LEAD IOW RICfKH PROPERLY.AL FNiS Wl ATICN N BE NUALLED N ACCCRDAR'E WM MMLFACRFERS 6FWECATXltl Ale ALSO bTA1E MINOR LOCAL WOES •RLL CRCLE I 6RWATICN PLANS APE OOBLTC AIe CRAIIN FCR*RAI'1LG CLAM'''.AL PPM MEOW 132 North S.Inton Avenue I -16612.40R L*ALP CIRCLE PAYHtiU SHALL OE YFEITe.LAY=CF FW8ATl1R b16211 NULL CE COORDN4TED Delray Death,Fl.33444 .QUARTER CR:LE BI114CCF6EW060L404G4PE PLAN (561)276-5050 —J S. THE COBRAC70R EWLL OE RESPRNS IRE FCR CORACT114 �1 - ---- ——— MIST FgADB FAX(561)276-8777 Lax UD6C4bVD ulLnEe TO user L cc4rCf l7 E CtH RACtOe ROAD RAIE6e VOA i'PO'NJP OMK P-I1 416 LIIH 71E FOLOitG WISES Y1Ri 11E WE MICR 70 Nbf11J.A71CN MO EECG£FM7L1AR LLTN DOOTLG.CODITKV! FEW NTERLOGKING PAVER DRIVE 0 Q 9 O B'6EFEA NC�E WI LP KAT WADI 4 VALVE LOCABCN6 AE SCHEMATIC OLY MO SAL BE ADJAIED FCR ORE CODRIOISEAOI VANE no NULL EE INSTALLED N A MOW OR CA EQ4 VALVE BOX liE Reg AD.U071'EILT REABIE BILL CC USED TO BALANCE P EONIE 11416,006100 TIE bT61E1. 0 O 0 0 1Y eaptlaWWII. b. PPM WALL OF SITED TO49RL1P PRO11041OO6 MOMANTAN RON%Ewan.BELOW 0 TA .. I 1213 e A O 10'OEREON�m.E i. BE IRRGA001COORCLER SNAIL ILE NSTALLEDN A1GWAIYE 14111 LOCALCCCEO Ate o MANFAA1.6230 IECAMINDATLIM PR PER GRA MIG ECLIRIENT NO WYE 1im1ELT01 718 ES I O W6ERES NOZZLE WALL BE PFL'1ED.A RAN SENSOR NULL BE MULLED TO O.112-RIDE14E COARILER ,-,,, G SNIT IALL 1EAD0MRSNAIL6Efm SNAIL OE SET AT TIE LEVANT OF ADJACENT PLANT MA7ERAL I l OPRN8ER La4TW4 ADJACeir TO PAVEMENT,01RCI1FES,WOES ETGOI4LL BE CRIET • FEET AOF Lob.LP MN fCR PCRP MIRT LEACB.tl'FOR 1RIB WIERl.Ib'K31 601R LEADS eueeLER NOZZLES AID TYPICALLY b FEET FOR 14076121 ALCM 1N7116EED R7ADII4Tl I. ALL OLIENG SMALL OE OCR 40 PVC TO 608 604CA1ED OI RA(GR F SOT INDICATED,A 11N AS*/ / 14/11014D GBBI2R NOmECNFO®RBHRS'ABOt£FWNCfiADE CF 3 PPE NES LARGER TWN BPF'LY DIE COLIA/ED.ALL REEVES 0ii4lL LE NATALLID A PEN CFu'BELOW RASH GRACE I® 13 EL•SI04 11 10.cortex SAFES NULLF LL APPROhD PE IOW AWN C4NINCL UM USE IASASE4 00i1RDL LIRE //J/// NO Q GAGE*FOND LIFE LIEN4LL BEBU0IED MD ATI4OFD TO TIE MAN LAE NIRE404 OR O BW-014 b GPM T1R11'N UK SLEEVES AT PAVEMENT CPOOSF44'11E 63CL FN[RACE.ALL IIRXE6 ROLL BE MACE /////'I BIH B 6 TATT3 006614NlAL SPLICE LOTS 41D CORAOFD IN VALVE COXEO.TWO EXTRA COMO. / / 4 VALVESWES WALL OE MULLED TOM 3RILEST VALVES N EMIL DOECTKN FR11 THE CONR'LLER no 1 L PRIG NIIAFRpI F1.INIIG AREA PARGIG.tlLMLY 40 F1.AYDEA64411.L BE SET TO RE NDE 1 WG FiA'F' , RAIGIRO PE S OEIES ELECTRIC GLOBE VAA.VE.00E AS NOTED t0 A11CLI R'V77 FO2 ROOT B4LLt PPE AO WICATID LN P1MN IS SO@LiG MD SL1OlD BE ON PLAN N ARE7FK/TRC4RSO4 OW VALVE BOX 4D.LLSIED IORREID C0001048. t _-_- ..-_.-.- _ C AIJ.(13E JOIQb SHALL BEGLEYED.6MOFD.ATD TREATED BIIHACGiJYED 11C44 ETCH FRIER � N fa 17RA00Gd1E VALVE,aME ODE 45 MANt+E. 440JDND1BF13A00.V9UCO8OR9GWR1401M D3561O / , 40 .1.AR DOHY41YE�/}/, 30.4t@1 PFE NEL4'01WL BECLl2S740 P.Lt b1'ORBR PPFO�PCRi f1�EATHt G4LL BE COWRO.IEW IOGAil01 4A..6 YAO P.G 6701T31 MA11 RILJ.EE O0140 RG t.606 NDCAIm CNP 443.F4RIGS LLL BE00.V94ILE1D BON 40 41.MAN LIEN14.L148E 14'14NI111 GOVSNALL0140 PWH.LF.L WV£7KK 460344YL BM?7OL FCR PPE 7F8GEO OH4I BE CLE4N M0 RR@ GP FOEVI.110R6 AIO 1.38 C6.FSIN BAOSLLF.D iR3NOEb NIL BF PROFIRY SLEEVES CGPACIED.ALL 11AH LIES BILL fE WT4LLED 1 KK 6!'FRd:N 4NY TREE GR PA11t _ LL yb0UL11MMSG0 MALL OE fSOPARED BY THE CQORACRCR NO CNtN TOILE OVER ii - - - --- T6IEEVE46O1�O PXvCO 6JLAL 0.Abl OLEEVE6 RtIGR TO FNAL ACC�1M04. E - E'RIPER TO ME KR ATo r814FACTLR783 S ASTR.CT F1"T`TAI1 TEES PER 6PRNC1EFB 4PECFED. (LAIN) ZONE I - - 0 Y.6diGATXN DT61@1 TO PROVIDE IGOa COVERAGE BIIH boa O.TOaAP KK �, fl Q SIZE I• ? EXISTING I-STORY GPM 24 �, r RESIDENCE ZONE 2 0 RW °"'°' v R°HFL'°" SIZE r Y cp..... 0 wwt..m Ow a^"1O1G*Nene come. w' � 6;i'LU. I'lu,g,,t.dI III,1 O�;M._ O;;� .RT or o 0 0 o O SCALE: I/8'=I'-( ' GPM 23 Ot O O weePIALE N•1:O"1 O.,sP w.WM. :l��t•:_, O©� ....oco... LOT 2 e ° LOT o KTG.eL� o __ ► • o ZONE 3 O «.�.+fo.d S 1L� R AROJ SIZE I' PKWLL�HKP�.L�P� O ©1•.c1ACPrHTi �L IL� I O ...a.....1 10 ` I \ ° Q P.<IG::::RB1 O.G 4 ,IRI, R'/; :uTMl.cY.n c.o... ------------- GPM 26 i Ii o _.�L��■��1-• 8 DEVICE _____ ����La� O 1.11.....0041.2 0 o 0 •• 0A110 00 O - L4µµyylI ••,___.._._______..____5 _ _. ___.. ...._____... .... _. T-IBIRD ROTOR POP-UP SPRINKLER R-50 ROTOR POP-UP'BPREKLER -� REMOTE CGNTROL.VALVE • • • pk-Aar mast. IWO I A. I , •,,,AI, •,.,VI, °....A1a.a•1t.o�'.a'A1 ., ., .....1...a.na.Q....a 'I 0 °•a.wrI�aw.w PROJECT , , 1 \ ' i e �A, 1' , ..�, O uv.`°`v+m wrma V , O '� 111$• 1 i�l. L o p t; p,.. �: ,I :. o O KEMISH OFFICE BUILDING i I w° "�r t o — O w'.�aR oai.w s T C jI I O ®'':a e^n:.1 O� Dr:0 1 r 1.Al 1'u� e L1 0 .e " °"'° o o „,� 131 N. SIUINTON AVENUE IROa. 8"a i 1 S^ � A o p p DELRAY BEACH,FL GCNEC:T TO —:b]� =-��% O O • {� IXISTPG.METER I U - RSEE FTC.DIICsb) �-1 ®r.c.a.w.c w•u. TITLE A 2 6L.EEKiii ,'� ..•0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 ��L.4]W -- 0 �_;----1-------I-- r-tort,d�• _GL__ ` -- ---- -�- ,— i i I, o O o IRRIGATION PLAN \ .\ -1' -------- ; , 5 , J e 13- --__ 18 - I -' b SPRAY 'POP-UP RAY SPRINKLE D SP\ - R 'POP-UP SPRAT RIKLER EIUeeLER I, V PRGJ.NO. L-I FILE NAME . _ 1'IJP/SGH DRAWN 2/10/03 DATE NORTH SWINTON AVENUE REV. SHEET __—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—__c,__—_—tbb'FRKMNT.OR,L,-. )--_—_—_—_—_-----_—_—_—_—_--_---_—_—__ IR_ OF • ' I 7 I .5 I I ( I I 'I I I(: 1'' _ • I 1 I') 1 1.'� 1 i•' 1• HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD SUBMITTAL FO.R: 11 - THE KEMISH OFFICE BUILDING �a 4 IA 131 NORTH SWINTON AVENUE 1 o '�I DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 1 z GENERAL NOTES CODES VICINITY MAP INDEXi. ice "- FLORIDA BIWLDING CODE,2201 EDITION 101 t( L THE CONTRACTOR:.!;ALL PERFOId1 ANY AND ALL CUTTING AND UEFA-12:LIFE SAFETY CODE,20ZO EDITION 1 OLD Scnooc Spun.LI ARC311TECIIIRAL5TR.OTURAL DRAu1NGS: PATCHING NECESSARY TO COMPLETE IRE UISR4- FLORIDA FIRS PREVENTION CODE,22Z1 EDITION - ASO TITLE:HEFT 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISR.'PT EXI5TL�fa SERVICES, STANDARD ELECTRICAL CODE.1331 EDITION 1 !!)if F.: •`'.' � I --1 iJ d y1�6I, i (ID CC 4` i I " 1'4 — 11 3I i A1D ARCHITECTURAL 517E PLAN0OPERATIONS,OR UTILITIES WITHOUT OBTAINING O'1CicR'S PRIOR .( APPROVAL AND INSTRUCTIONS IN EACH CASE. STANDARD MECHANICAL CODE,1991 E7 O\ = k _ ➢ k170! A20 NEW CCNSTRJCTICN FLOOR FLAN/ELEVATIONS Z' }�?�� MI ➢➢ ➢C eia>e sea ➢113.7:tt inj STANDARD PLUMBING CODE,199-:EDITION I ,1 d➢➢ I 7J7A117 IN ItI11', ,o 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL TO THE -•@ -1.P JABS I11 pI 12 III lia FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE/ADA-P-00,:�91 EDITION !"' CIVIL DRAU71Ya: REGYJIREMENTS OF LOCAL CODES- 6p➢➢➢➢ ➢➢ Il ➢➢id d➢➢.➢➢d},!!17 l!''ll��;� _ 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOS SITE AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL OTHER RILES,REGULATIONS AND CODES HAVI*G JARISD'iCTION .._ pima-t 111/ li 1 1::. I SITE PAVING 4 DRAIN PLAN lV MISC.DETAILS we THE VERIFICATION CF ALL ELEVATIONS,CONDITIONS,AND DIMENSIONS INCLUDING EAT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO: : is:1.1 esi:IA II°d-d➢ddd Min:::: cot PRIOR TO COMMENCIn'G.s CONSTRICTION. 9➢➢➢➢gP9SIgp�q ➢➢➢➢➢➢- i?lillili3t TPT ETT II CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,F ORDA -I I EE-.'➢m➢ R➢•➢➢3➢➢➢➢➢➢➢¢IDiii7iii:M:155 Aniil- ELECTRICAL DRAWING: 1111111 V ,I 5. ANT COI•FLICTS OR OMISSIONS EETILEEN TaE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF COUNTY OF PALM SEACH 1 -rig_I 'G.le I�i 1 I THE WORKING DRAWING'S AND/OR GENERAL NOTES SHALL BE BROUGHT STATE CF FLORIDA ® ➢•— 17➢j' 17 Hp •i SP-I SITE F'HOTCFIETRC FUN 4 DETAILS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT IITMEDIATELY AND BEFORE ,,11F1IMIL "' PROCEEDIN's WITH ANY ILDRC.SO INVOLVED. DO NOT SCALE '4.1 l e 11 41 DRALUEIS5. {■ice■ ��yy 1��=�■ �y�s IAA iL.LI4. A ..A3 c.11.i r1L.i.21ILI S. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND VERIFY WITH ALL BLDG. D E V I E,A I� C9 C.14 T A LANDSCAPE DRAW:MIS: En SL'BCONTRA.CTORS THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL PiP.'-G,DUCTUIORK LA PLANTING PLAN TRENCHES,SLEEVES,SPECIAL SOLTIi O FOR SO'11PI TENT CONDUITS, IR-I IRRGATION FLAN ETC. I I FOR ('r'I'PANCY CLA SSIFICATIO4: OFFICE USE 1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE BLDG.CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V.UNPROTECTED ALL MEANS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION. ZONING.DISTRICT: OSSHAD,OLD SCHOOL SMJAR-HISTORIC ART E.DS:RIOT S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LEAVING ALL FINISH DESIGN LAND LOAD: I12 MILES PER HOUR _ SURFACES CLEAN AT COMPLETION OF THE LI%F�G AND SHALL REMOVE �iyi ALL EXCESS MATERIAL AND DEBRIS FROM THE JOB REGULARLY. TENANT SEPARATION: N/A Mahal S. JOB SITE MEASUREMENTS ARE THE FILL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ® Werit CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AND MOST EE TAKEN FOR ALL W ITEMS SY ALL SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO FABRICATION. 12. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING 1 • ow SOLID P.P.T.BLO.^1.LING BEHIND ALL SHELVING,CABINETS,ETC_OR J EOUIF11Eh1T R i1NG SCIJIR SACKING. SYMBOLS ABBREVIATIONS PROJECT TEAM �I.7 LEI _ IL FINAL INSPECTIONS ARE REORE t;iD FOR ALL PERIITS. r o E DETAIL Io = -' RIG ""r ARCHITECT, ( DETAIL vEFERENCE: -t..�. ^4J- r - A5.1 ( SHEET NUMBER f _ °� CAF't ARCHITECTS.LNC. _ Ems:. `""-.'- 132 NE BIN AVEME MUM 0 F' Y cPL. 0...161D6IRw=..u'�` DELRAY BEACH,F_OR,DA 33433-5415 E.-ELE✓A-:ON N.L^IEER �.=.er ,e`f"r. Off-06'I- PHO (561)214-61043 it1�i ELEVATION REFERENCE: ( 5 SET\:i iE_c a � ,i 1 s c0I iii� MAE �rIR FAX (.o)214-6101Liu MINN ` �, PRECAST STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, he E ?P.T. TRE.it. (---SECT ION NI i'lE R Rx 'r p„e,r"" M:CARTHY AND ASSOCIATES,INC. /A SECTION REFER..'=t•10E. ATa �—SHEET NUMBER - - °Ecc,:.0.. A,. 4.�..krn.. 403-A NORTHEAST 3RD STREET NJ yE MR R. RRADIU DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA 33433 iiyy ■■ c cc...WOO Pi-i0 (56U 921-0338 `"� Pra " 4`�', RAN WAR.R FAX FAX fSb1)921-0340 ( .J:.LL NUMBER = rr V s X• r D (` INTERIOR ELEVATION ,fin ( INTERIOR ELEV. V - u`' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, � `-, REFERENCE: s►" SHEET NJf'IEEi2 A.GRANT ihORR,IER'11',H AND ASSOCIATES T m ---- an°- 6'F,vAv E2 NORTH SANTON AVEAi.IE - - F a''a"V"a` ' ei iwx DELRAY EEACIl,FLORIDA 33444 _m sm rr s;. ROOM REFERENCE: I��� ( ROOM\L:.^^BEK - - - _-- - Pi{O (361)216-52:9 • � - rat:n.. FAX (Sall 216-81T1 • Fa_ - TMc.c r<Aso G-ooe i ` TOG. ION cs GUT.' DOOR REFERENCE: w raR IrGF :,'E CIVIL ENGINEER, ( GGGR tvu;'tEER - ' .°La Y w TOP. o N.re r GERA D B.CHURCH PE ¢°PN w E«I s. °nkwwsc NOTE° 505 NE 3RD STREET:SUI1E 9 _ .c._a;_ccra DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA 33483 WINDOW REFERENCE: O ( WIV O NUMBER VE. ER Drown vGLF. ,£Rn sass. F'j -- °�+•.FeR PHO (5oU 266-�520 C. 'z °ri41 Project No. :°. u>-a:,eR i° ON FAX (581)2°6-'ar20 2CO2.3C F is - .r1aYrt File No. NOTE REFERENCE: �n�z R N .wrEr 3 i E RE=cRENGE NUMBER w WOO + 111/E/P ENGINEER. CC'iE �4 TH0(1PSOI ENGINEERING C'.,N'SU:TANTS Date r �+-. +..-,.N._ •r'_¢ 920 LINTCN ELVD,5'J!TE 200 �J. 1 e.2Dy3 REVISION REFERENCE: /-� E REVISION NUMBER =r L i 'a"°.E DELRAY BEACH,FLORiDA 33444 Draping No. m.x ru.-..-- • E ,.area a.:e _ 147, PH0 (.°U 214.0200 1. _ua • oOR OR I- FAX :581)214-0222 A0.0 . ° n..a. © COPE ARCHITECTS,INC., ,e._ .,rw of - 3 I .1 I I I ' I I I'