The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB- 06-02-2004 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: June 2, 2004 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua Mary Lou Jamison, Rhonda Sexton, Randee Schatz, Jeffrey Silberstein, Maura Dersh, and John Miller, Jr. MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Brian Shutt, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:07 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Nomination of Vice Chairman: It was moved by Chairman Perez, seconded by Ms. Schatz and passed 7 to 0 to appoint Jeffrey Silberstein Vice Chairman. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Silberstein and passed 7 to 0 to approve the March 17, 2004 Minutes as written. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 118 Dixie Boulevard (Lots 2-5, Block 5), Del-Ida Park Historic District, Kim Dwyer, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: Consider waivers and a variance request associated with the development of Lots 2 - 5, Block 5. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any ex-parte communications. JUNE Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 2, 2004 Ms. Sexton advised she spoke with Ms. Kim Dwyer regarding the property Ms. Dwyer was attempting to develop in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. Ms. Jamison advised she and Ms. Peart discussed the history of the house, the people living in the area, and re-platting. Chairman Perez advised he spoke with Ms. Dwyer regarding various issues relating to the Historic Preservation Board. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board and entered the project file and her resume into record. Staff was in favor of demolition of the garage due to its structural condition and non- contributing status as assessed during a site visit. Staff further recommended approval of the variance to reduce the setback from 10' (ten feet) to 5' (five feet) as this aided in retaining the historic dwelling in situ. Ms. Dwyer was present to represent the project and discussed the proposal for the property. She stated that three (3) new homes would be constructed. Originally this parcel was to be developed for two (2) homes. However, the re-plat was requested in order to accommodate three (3) newly constructed homes; two (2) on Dixie Boulevard and one (1) on NE 2nd Avenue. The home proposed for Lot 1 on Dixie Boulevard would be in keeping with the adjacent historic home upon creation of the 50' lot. The extant historic house would remain and an associated garage may be proposed at a later date. Ms. Dwyer showed sketches of potential elevations of the new construction. Chairman Perez inquired if any members of the public wished to address the Board. Ms. JoAnn Peart, 107 NW 9th Street, Delray Beach, advised in the mid 1980's several people had discussed starting a neighborhood association as well as a historic district association. Clemmer Mayhue conducted research and an article was published in the Delray News Journal mentioning that Del-Ida Park was the first planned subdivision in Delray Beach. Ms. Peart expressed her concerns over the creation of the 50' lot as it related to the existing development pattern. Ms. Andrea Harden, 516 N. Swinton Avenue, Delray Beach, stated that a 50' lot is too small for the neighborhood. The current lots along Dixie Boulevard do not lie on 50' wide lots and a five foot (5') setback is too small. Ms. Sara Greely, 109 Dixie Boulevard, Delray Beach, expressed concern about the reduction of the side setbacks. The dwellings would be too close together and would lose their architectural merit. Therefore, she was opposed to reducing the setback to 5' (five feet). Mr. Sandy Jamison, 515 N. Swinton Avenue, advised he was a Historic Preservation Board member from 1990-1994. He expressed concern that the historic district would disappear. He also opposed overcrowding on the lots. Further, the 10' separation between the homes would not be acceptable. 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 2, 2004 Ms. Shay advised she received two letters; one from Ames Design International, 203 Dixie Boulevard who strongly supported the project and felt it would enhance the neighborhood, the second from John Gross, 201 NE 5th Court, Delray Beach, who advised, via e-mail, that he was opposed to building larger homes in the area and did not want to see a concrete jungle. Ms. Shelly Perry, 524 NE 2nd Avenue, Delray Beach, advised she supported retention of Dixie Boulevard's open space. She stated that four (4) houses on that property would ruin the look of the neighborhood and would create extreme setbacks. She was in agreement with the other homeowners. Chairman Perez asked if there was a rebuttal from staff. There was none. Ms. Dwyer stated that her request was only for one five foot (5') variance and that an alternative would support the construction of two (2) larger homes on the property. Such houses would not be in scale with the neighborhood. She attempted to create a proposal that everyone will be proud of and that will compliment the neighborhood. She asked for the Board's support in this endeavor. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. Chairman Perez felt this project protects the historic district from what happened in the Marina Historic District with the building of large townhouses and single family dwellings. Ms. Dersh inquired about the location of the setback. Ms. Shay advised it is located on the northeast side of the existing house, adjacent to the proposed 50' lot. She also confirmed that the proposal required that the Board make a recommendation only for the waivers and plat to the City Commission. Chairman Perez stated that the setbacks are necessary in order to retain the extant dwelling in situ and it should not be relocated. Retention of the dwelling while supporting new construction was also accomplished with the O'Neal property (910 NE 2nd Avenue) as well as other homes in the area. Ms. Schatz questioned whether there would be more than one 5' (five-foot) setback requested at a later date. The Board did not wish to send the message that it is appropriate to request more than one request for a reduction of the setback. Ms. Jamison asked if the developer spoke with any of the neighbors for their input. Dixie Boulevard consists of small cottages; there are no two-story houses on 50' lots in the area. The neighbors do not want these large homes. Mr. Silberstein informed the Board that he looked at many areas that have fifty (50') lots in other neighborhoods. He inquired as to whether the LDR's supported the construction of a two-story home on the proposed lot size. He also expressed his concern about the appearance of the proposed new construction on the 50' lot and if granting the variance is appropriate. He further expressed concern over approving the variance without prior knowledge of the new elevations. 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 2, 2004 Ms. Schatz stated that individuals were too personally involved in the decision process, however, the burden has not been met by the applicant to allow the Board to grant the variance. Mr. Miller stated that as property values are not going to come down, much larger dwellings may be proposed on just two conforming lots and that should not be supported as they will be inappropriate to the scale of the neighborhood. If this project is not approved there will be much larger homes proposed on the lots. With the limited control, the threat of greater and denser construction could increase. Ms. Jamison asked Mr. Shutt about the verbiage in the staff report on page five relative to not being developed except in accordance with the minimum frontage and lot area requirements of 75' x 100' and whether the Board could recommend denial. Mr. Shutt advised based on the facts presented, it is our understanding that currently this lot does not exist. Chairman Perez felt that if the lot measured 125' the homes being built would be much larger. Fifty foot lots can be found all over town. The Board would not be taking action on any issue other than approving the creation of the 50' lot. Overall, he felt that the Board would prefer to see a 30' wide house on a 50' lot rather than a 100' wide house on a much larger lot. Ms. Sexton agreed with Chairman Perez and advised that the Board must look at the current proposal. Mr. Miller advised that there are a few larger homes on NE 7th Street, as well as two- story houses on North Swinton Avenue. Ms. Schatz inquired if the applicant was prohibited from building a two-story home. Chairman Perez advised two-story homes could be built. Ms. Dersh questioned if an adjustment could be made to the house so the setback could be larger. She recommended that a condition should be attached with respect to re-working the plat. Mr. Silberstein inquired if the five foot (5') setback was approved on the north side only and inquired if the integrity of the new plat would be protected. Chairman Perez advised the Board was voting on a 5' (five foot) setback, not the design of the home. Demolition Request After much discussion, it was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and passed 7 to 0 to move approval of the demolition of the 286 sq. ft. garage, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1). 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 2, 2004 Variance It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and passed 7 to 0 to move approval of a variance to reduce the side interior building setback from 10' (ten feet) to 5' (five feet) for the contributing dwelling at 118 Dixie Boulevard by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in LDR Section 2.4.7(A). Waivers It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and passed 6 to 1 (Jamison dissenting) to move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission of the waivers to reduce the total lot area and lot frontage/width requirements, as described in the staff report, for Lots 2 - 5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park subdivision, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.7(B), 4.1.4(C), and 4.3.1(D) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Re-Plat It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and passed 6 to 1 (Jamison dissenting) to move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for the Historic Del-Ida Park Plat (118 Dixie Boulevard) by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with respect to the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. V. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS A. J & F Beauty Supply, 60 West Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic district, Joe Dillard, Art Sign Company, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a wall sign. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board and entered the project file into record. No one was present to represent the applicant. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any comments from the Public. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. There were none. 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 2, 2004 It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 7 to 0 to move approval of the COA request for 60 West Atlantic Avenue, J & F Beauty Supply, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.6.7.(G)(1)(a), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c) of the LDR's, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. B. The Rectory, 14 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Bright Image Signs, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a wall sign and an associated waiver. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board and entered the project file into record. The wall sign required a waiver as there are more than two existing signs already on the parcel. Jimmy Moore, the applicant, advised the existing free-standing sign could not be seen from the street. Therefore, an additional sign is necessary for better visibility. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. Ms. Sexton inquired if a canopy sign could be installed out front. Mr. Moore advised that there is not enough clearance for a canopy sign. Chairman Perez felt the Board should mention conditions that the building is set back, concerns over visibility, etc. Waiver It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 7 to 0 to move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) to permit more than two signs on one lot, parcel, or development at 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory, Inc. by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.7(B)(5) of the Land Development Regulations. Certificate of Appropriateness It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Mr. Miller, and passed 7 to 0 to move approval of the COA request for 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory, Inc., by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7) of the LDR's, 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 2, 2004 and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the waiver to allow more than one sign per lot, parcel, or development is approved by the City Commission. The Board took a break at 7:25 p.m. and reconvened at 7:35 p.m. C. Donovan Residence, 144 NW 3`d Avenue, West Settlers Historic District, Kim Donovan, Owner. Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of decorative shutters and removable storm panels. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board and entered the project file into record. The applicant was not present. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any comments from the Public. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. Ms. Sexton questioned why fiberglass was proposed for the decorative shutters. Ms. Shay stated that wood can be used, however, aluminum or fiberglass are preferable due to lower maintenance. Wood shutters are expensive and not as durable. Mr. Silberstein did not support the use of fiberglass. The Board concurred and wished to add a condition of approval that wood must be utilized. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Sexton, and passed 7 to 0 to move approval of the COA request for 144 NW 3rd Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the LDR's and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the tracks or channels are painted to match the exterior of the building; 2) That shutter dogs will be installed; and, 3) That the shutters are constructed of wood. 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 2, 2004 D. Mano-A-Mano (fka Tapas), 8 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Castle Florida, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for the installation of removable storm panels. Chairman Perez stepped down. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board and entered the project file into record. The applicant was not present. Chairwoman Schatz inquired if there were any comments from the Public. There were none. Chairwoman Schatz closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. There were none. It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Jamison, and passed 6 to 0 to move approval of the COA request and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for 8 East Atlantic Avenue, Mano-a-Mano, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the LDR's and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following condition: 1) That the tracks or channels are painted to match the exterior of the building. Chairman Perez returned to the Board. E. S+D Architecture, Inc., 138 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, James Downey & Keith Snider, Authorized Agents. Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing sign. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board and entered the project file into record. James Downey, applicant representing S+D Architecture, stated that the cottage and associated main building will be leased by the company. The color of both buildings will be changed and they wished to match the sign with the new exterior colors. Mr. Downey presented "Colonial Revival Sea Green" for the body of the buildings, "Colonial White" for the trim with black shutters. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any comments from the Public. There were none. 8 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 2, 2004 Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. The Board concurred with the proposed color choices. It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 7 to 0 to move approval of the COA request for 138 North Swinton Avenue, S+D Architecture, Inc., by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7) of the LDR's, and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) The approved colors of the sign are: "Colonial Revival Sea Green" and "Classical White" with the S+D logo and address as proposed by the applicant; and, 2) That the color scheme of the sign or building is modified in order to compliment one another. VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments—none B. Report from Historic District Representatives - none C. Board Members Ms. Shay asked the Board for direction regarding vinyl fences. Administrative approvals may be conducted for fences, however, staff is uncertain whether to permit vinyl or not. Therefore, staff requested direction from the Board. Ms. Jamison did not have a problem with vinyl fences though she would like to view samples relative to quality prior to approval. Ms. Sexton stated that individuals cannot be told what quality of vinyl can be utilized. Ms. Dersh questioned if this would be a street fence. Ms. Shay confirmed that it was. Ms. Shay stated that vinyl will either be approved or disapproved across the board. The Board decided that they would prefer to see wood fences, however, if an applicant wished to move forward with the vinyl, it must be reviewed by the Board. D. Staff Ms. Shay thanked everyone for their support of the Florida Trust Annual Meeting in Delray Beach. 9 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 2, 2004 Ms. Shay advised staff that the next Florida Trust Annual Meeting will be held in Pensacola. VII. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 8:10 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for June 2, 2004, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on August 4, 2004. i l . Denise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 10 • AGENDA '= HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING °tt ' Y CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ltq� O P Meeting Date: June 2, 2004 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ELECTION OF OFFICERS • Vice Chairperson III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • March 17, 2004 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 118 Dixie Boulevard (Lots 2-5, Block 5), Del-Ida Park Historic District, Kim Dwyer, Authorized Agent. Consider waivers and a variance request associated with the development of Lots 2-5, Block 5. V. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. J&F Beauty Supply, 60 West Atlantic, Old School Square Historic District, Joe Dillard, Art Sign Company, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a wall sign. B. The Rectory, 14 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Bright Image Signs, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a wall sign and an associated waiver. C. Donovan Residence, 144 NW 3rd Avenue, West Settlers Historic District, Kim Donovan, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of decorative shutters and removable storm panels. June 2,2004 HPB Meeting Page 2 D. Mano-A-Mano (fka Tapas), 8 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Castle Florida, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for the installation of removable storm panels. E. S+D Architecture, Inc., 138 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, James Downey& Keith Snider, Authorized Agents. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing sign. VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff VII. ADJOURN ,ArlI Wendy Shay, Hipric Presery ion Planner U POSTED ON: May 27, 2004 oaRAY BP" e� �t �, ,Z„y�+ i'�3 1 (. .,� � + UEI1rtY BEACH "'}"° "`�' HISTORI PRE ERV T�(3 U�BOARt ,� 1 11 " MEMORANDLJ ST ►FF REPORT f lJJ11,a1 x S vv '` �•v`. 'f2 4 {, ,. £ , _4.•a .,n' 1,4 y 1001 "h ,4 t z1 'S kF �: `- �� h 1993 2 Agent: Virginia Childers (Owner)/Kim Dwyer(Applicant) Project Name: Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park Project Location: 118 Dixie Boulevard ._. z .,_ ... : . .. } ITEM�BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of the following aspects relating to 118 Dixie Boulevard (Lots 2-5, Block 5): • Demolition request for a 286 sq. ft. non-contributing garage, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J); • A variance request to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the side interior (northeast) setback from 10' (ten feet)to 5' (five feet) in order to facilitate the development of Lot 2 (proposed as Lot 1), pursuant to LDR Sections 2.4.7(A) and 4.5.1(J); and, • A recommendation to the City Commission regarding waivers from the Land Development Regulations Sections 4.1.4(C) and 4.3.1(D) regarding the minimum lot dimension requirements for the proposed lots associated with the re-plat of Lots 2-5, Block 5 to be known as the Historic Del-Ida Park Plat; and, • A recommendation to the City Commission regarding the proposed Historic Del-Ida Park re-plat. BACKGROUND The subject property is designated as a part of the Del-Ida Park Historic District and is located on the southeast side of Dixie Boulevard and lies just west of NE 2nd Avenue. The property is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). The property contains a one-story, 1,836 sq. ft. contributing dwelling constructed in 1930 and a 286 sq. ft. garage constructed in 1948. The garage lies to the southeast of the property, to the rear of the historic dwelling, and is situated on Lot 3 and a portion of Lot 5. Due to the change in lot configuration with the request to re-plat and based on the extant location of the historic dwelling, a demolition request is necessary in order to facilitate the construction of a single family home on proposed Lot 4. Also proposed is a variance request to reduce the side interior setback from 10' to five feet (5') in order to retain the extant historic dwelling. The associated variance pertains to proposed Lot 2 (existing Lot 3 and a portion of Lot 4, Block 5). Further, waiver requests are necessary in order to allow the reconfiguration of the four (4) lots. The waivers will allow the reduction of lot frontage and width from the required Meeting Date:June 2,2004 Agenda Item:III.A. 118 Dixie Boulevard Demolition,Waiver,&Variance Request Lots 2-5, Block 5,Del-Ida Park Page 2 75' to 50' for Lot 2, adjacent to the historic dwelling. The other waivers will permit the total lot area (for lots 1 & 2) of the new re-plat to measure less than the minimum required 9,500 sq. ft per lot (7,932 sq. ft. for lot 1 and 7, 500 sq. ft. for lot 2). The applicant is concurrently processing a request to re-plat Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park in order to accommodate the construction of three (3) new, single family residences to be located to the northeast, southwest and southeast of the extant historic dwelling. In order to process the request, the applicant also seeks a recommendation from the Historic Preservation Board to the City Commission to proceed with the approval of the plat. All requests are now before the Board for review. >., s.. PROJECT DESCRIPTIiNYr -' ? ➢ Demolition request of a 286 sq. ft. garage, located to the southeast of the extant contributing dwelling; ➢ A variance request for the reduction of the side interior setback from 10' to five feet (5') to allow retention of the historic dwelling and the construction of a single family home on proposed Lot 1; ➢ Recommendation to the City Commission for the approval of waiver requests to permit the creation of two non-conforming lots with reduced frontage and width of Lot 1 and to allow Lots 1 and 2 of the newly created lots for the re-plat to have less than the minimum required 9,500 sq. ft. total lot area (7,932 sq. ft. for lot.1 and 7,500 sq. ft. for lot 2); and, ➢ Recommendation to the City Commission for the re-plat of Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park (proposed as Lots 1-4, Block 5). DEMOLITION ANALYSIS Demolition (garage) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), The HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing in the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. 118 Dixie Boulevard Demolition,Waiver,&Variance Request Lots 2-5, Block 5,Del-Ida Park Page 3 (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. The one-story, 286 sq. ft. garage to the southeast of the dwelling is slated for demolition based on its structural condition and to clear the property in order to facilitate the construction of a single family home on lot 5 (proposed lot 4). The structure would be considered contributing based upon its age, however, the building has been significantly altered (including replacement of windows) and lacks all but minimal design elements which link it to the main dwelling. The structure has also suffered increasing neglect through a lack of basic maintenance. As the garage does not share the intrinsic architectural elements associated with the main dwelling and the structure has suffered significant neglect, demolition of the garage can be supported based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1). g " " VARIANCE ANALYSIS z s ' Variance Request: The variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) pertains to the side interior setback requirements for property located in the R-1-AA (Single Family Residential) zoning district. If granted the variance will allow the historic dwelling to remain in its current location and a single family home developed to the northeast of the existing house, if the waivers and re-plat are approved. The specific variance involves the reduction of the side interior (northeast) setback from 10' (ten feet) to 5' (five feet) in order to retain the existing historic residence and to facilitate the development of Lot 2 (proposed as Lot 1). Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(J), in addition to the required findings of LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5) (copy attached), the Board may also be guided by the following as an alternative to the above criteria: (1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare; (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenances, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places; (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site; and, 118 Dixie Boulevard Demolition,Waiver,&Variance Request Lots 2-5,Block 5,Del-Ida Park Page 4 (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of a historic site or a historic district. (2) Or, as an alternative to Sub-Section (J)(1), that a variance is necessary to accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of a structure within a Historic District or upon a Historic Site through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare; (b) The variance would not significantly diminish the historic character of the Historic District or Site; and, (c) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to affect the adaptive reuse of an existing structure or site. (3) The Board shall otherwise follow procedures and impose conditions as required of the Board of Adjustments. In order to retain the historic dwelling in situ, a variance for the reduction of the side interior setbacks on Lot 3, Block 5 (proposed as Lot 2) is requested. The property currently consists of Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park subdivision, of which Lot 3 and a portion of Lot 4 contains the historic main dwelling. Upon re-platting the four (4) lots, four (4) new lots will be created allowing the retention of the historic building and the creation of three (3) new parcels for development, two of which will not meet the minimum requirements. As the re-configuration of the existing Lots 2 and 3 will become non-conforming, a variance to reduce the side interior setback from 10' to five feet (5') is necessary to maintain the existing historic residence, while enabling the balance of the property to be developed. Given the contributing status of the historic house, the proximity of the house to the adjacent lot line, and the significance of retaining the historic dwelling, a variance can be supported to reduce the side interior setback. Thus, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 With the re-platting of the existing lot 3 and a portion of lots 4 and 5, which contains both the historic main dwelling and the garage, lot 3 (proposed as lot 2) will become non-conforming with respect to its side interior setback. The reduction of the side interior setback will not negatively impact the contributing status of the historic dwelling and is the minimum necessary in order to preserve the dwelling. Granting the variance would allow the building to retain its original location and orientation without the threat of relocation or demolition. Further, granting the variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare by negatively impacting surrounding properties or altering the contributing status of the dwelling. Special conditions and circumstances exist due to the present lot configuration and the location of the historic main dwelling and granting the variance for the setback reduction is the minimum necessary to justify its location to the adjacent the property line. Given the conditions under which this variance is being requested, it is reasonable to believe that the variance would be granted elsewhere under similar circumstances based upon the City's objectives to preserve historic resources. Based upon the above analysis, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1). 118 Dixie Boulevard Demolition,Waiver,&Variance Request Lots 2-5, Block 5,Del-Ida Park Page 5 Waiver Request: LDR Section 4.3.1(D), no yard or lot existing at the time of the passage of this chapter shall be reduced in area or dimensions below the minimum requirements set forth herein. Lots or yards created after October 1, 1990 shall meet the minimum requirements established by this chapter unless the City Commission declares at the time of approval of an associated development application that it is necessary and appropriate to create such a non-conformity. The applicant requests the reconfiguration of four (4) existing non-conforming lots in order to create four (4) buildable lots. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the following are the minimum lot size requirements for properties zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). The following table illustrates the minimum lot requirements and proposed lot requirements associated with the project: 4 rM>n�mum Lot Requirements Proposed Lot Conflguiration** Lot Area Lot Area Frontage Width Depth (sq ) Frontage Width Depth (sq. ft.) Lot 1*a 75 75 100 9,500 4 50:` 50 149 7,932 ,i Lot 75 75 100 9,500 75 75 100 ,, 7,500&; 75 75 100 9,500 75 77 140 9,646 Loot 4* 75 75 100 9,500 87.58 80 110 9,500 *Irregularly shaped lots **Waivers to lot dimension requirements apply to Lots 1 and 2 and are denoted by the shaded boxes. The project involves three (3) waiver requests and a variance request to permit the development of current Lots 2-5, Block 5 of the Del-Ida Park subdivision (proposed as Lots 1-4 as noted in the table above). The proposal involves the future construction of three (3) new single family homes to be located adjacent to the extant historic house. The homes will be constructed in keeping with the Mediterranean-Revival style of the historic residence and the surrounding historic neighborhood, however, the design elements will be considered under a separate COA application. The present lot 2 and a portion of lots 4 and 5 are currently vacant with the historic house and garage lying on lot 3 and a portion of lots 4 and 5. Upon reconfiguration of the proposed lots, the parcels will consist of four (4) buildable lots with three (3) houses proposed along Dixie Boulevard and one (1) single family home facing NE 2nd Avenue. Lots 2-5 are currently owned by the same individual. LDR Section 4.1.4(C) requires that, with the exception of single family residences subject to the R-1-A zoning district standards, if two (2) or more adjoining lots (or a combination of lots and portion of lots) of record were under the same ownership as of October 18, 1994, and if the total frontage area is equal to or greater than that which is required by the zoning district regulations, said property shall not be developed except in accordance with the minimum frontage and lot area requirements of 75x100. 118 Dixie Boulevard Demolition,Waiver,&Variance Request Lots 2-5,Block 5,Del-Ida Park Page 6 Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; _ c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; and, d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Given the nature of the historic house and garage and their proximity on lot 3 and a portion of lots 4 and 5, a waiver for the development of substandard lot 2 (proposed lot 1) can be supported in order to retain the adjacent, extant historic dwelling and support the creation of a buildable lot. Further, the re-configuration of Lot 3 (proposed as Lot 2) will reduce the required area from 9,500 sq. ft. to 7,500 sq. ft. As the re-configuration permits the retention and future rehabilitation of the historic dwelling, a waiver to reduce the area of proposed Lot 2 can also be supported. As the intent of the Board is to preserve the nature of historic residence, support of the waivers can be substantiated as approval of the waivers would permit the retention of the historic building without demolition or relocation. Given the discussion above, the three (3) waiver requests will neither adversely affect the neighboring area nor grant a special privilege as the building's location is pre-existing. Further, no public facilities will be at risk and no unsafe situations shall be formed by the granting of this waiver. It is also reasonable to presume that waivers would be granted under similar circumstances when involving the preservation of an historic building. AS SESSMENT AND CONC1 USION .. . _ . . ,.. ._ The Mediterranean-Revival dwelling reflects the traditional historic architecture found in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. However the associated garage does not reflect the true architectural materials or design of the Mediterranean-Revival style of architecture. Therefore, granting the demolition of the non-contributing garage, the variance, and the waivers would encourage the rehabilitation of the existing one-story, contributing dwelling and would support the retention of the building in situ as well as retain its original orientation as affiliated with the neighborhood. Granting the variance and waivers would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare by negatively impacting the surrounding properties. Special conditions and circumstances exist because of the historic setting and the requests are the minimum necessary to aid the retention and rehabilitation of the existing residence. Given the discussion above, the variance and waiver requests will not adversely affect the neighboring area or is a special privilege being granted pursuant to LDR Sections 2.4.7(A) and (B). Further, positive findings can be made pursuant to LDR Sections 4.1.4(C) and 4.3.1(D) regarding the four lot subdivision based on the retention of the contributing building on Lot 2 (as it exists to date). • 118 Dixie Boulevard Demolition,Waiver,&Variance Request Lots 2-5, Block 5,Del-Ida Park Page 7 } ATFN A T If i 4 TtN S A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the request for demolition and the associated variance for Lots 2- 5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park subdivision and move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for the waivers to reduce the total - lot area and lot frontage/width requirements, as described in this report, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.7(A), 2.4.7(B), 4.1.4(C), 4.3.1(D), and 4.5.1(F) of the Land Development Regulations, subject to conditions. C. Move denial of the request for demolition and the associated variance for Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park subdivision and move a recommendation of denial to the City Commission for the waivers to reduce the total lot area and lot frontage/width requirements, as described in this report, based upon a finding that the request and approval thereof is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.7(A), 2.4.7(B), 4.1.4(C), 4.3.1(D), and 4.5.1(F) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMM€NDA"TION By Separate Motion: Demolition Request Move approval of the demolition of the 286 sq. ft. garage, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1). Variance Move approval of a variance to reduce the side interior building setback from 10' to five feet (5')for the contributing dwelling at 118 Dixie Boulevard by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in LDR Section 2.4.7(A). Waivers Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission of the waivers to reduce the total lot area and lot frontage/width requirements, as described in this report, for Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park subdivision, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.7 118 Dixie Boulevard Demolition,Waiver,&Variance Request Lots 2-5,Block 5,Del-Ida Park Page 8 (B), 4.1.4(C), and 4.3.1(D) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Re-Plat Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission of the Historic Del-Ida Park Plat (118 Dixie Boulevard) by adopting the findings of fact and_ law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with respect to the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Attachments:Appendix A, Survey,Proposed Lots, Map Report Prepared-by Wendy Shay,Historic Preservation Planner APPENDIX The Board of Adjustment/Historic Preservation Board must make the following findings prior to approval of a variance: (a) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings subject to the same zoning (The matter of economic hardship shall not constitute a basis for the granting of a variance); (b) That literal interpretation of the regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties subject to the same zoning; (c) That the special conditions and circumstances have not resulted from actions of the applicant; (d) That granting the variance will not confer onto the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other lands, structures, and buildings under the same zoning. Neither the permitted, nor nonconforming use, of neighborhood lands, structures, or buildings under the same zoning shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance; (e) That the reasons set forth in the variance petition justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and, (f) That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of existing regulations, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 2477 . . . J G'>. Q P- N.E. 7TH ST. N.W. 7TH ST. u_i<>L Q PLO OJ N.W. 6TH ST. O N.E. 6TH ST. N D P?:--<' • 3 \,% k.K j �� F� Q AN.E.� 5TH TERR. WOOD LN. loT o O N<Dis LOT 4 \—_— ' N.E. 5TH CT. O \:\G- 6 TRINI TY N.E. 5TH ST. LUTHERAN Ui z LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. 4TH T. hi> POST 11111F]l CASON OFFICE METHODIST CHURCH Uiz N HISTORIC DEL - IDA PARK PLAT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PROPOSED LOT CONFIGURATION PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM172 4 DELRAY 8EACM i 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD �� j MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT goo, Agent: Art Sign Company Project Name: J&F Beauty Supply Project Location: 60 West Atlantic Avenue ITEM BEFORE TH_E BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a wall sign on a non-contributing property, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J) and 2.4.7(B). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lots 1 & 2, less the north 20 feet), Block 61, Town of Delray and is located on the southeast corner of West Atlantic Avenue and SW 1st Avenue. The property is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The masonry building was constructed in 1998 and is considered a non-contributing property within the Old School Square Historic District. On December 18, 1996, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved a Certificate of Appropriateness and related site plan, landscape plan, and design elements for the construction of a one-story, 2,832 sq. ft., concrete block building consisting of a 2,250 sq. ft. bay to accommodate the Check Cashing Store along with a 582 sq. ft. bay. The building was constructed in 1998. J&F Beauty Supply wishes to occupy the 582 sq. ft. bay and is now before the Board for the installation of a wall sign. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..... ... . The proposal involves the installation of a flat wall sign for a retail establishment. Located on the northwest corner of the building on the cornice over the entrance doors, the wall sign measures 84" (7') in length, 24" (2') in height, and is 14 sq. ft. in area. The proposed sign will consist of an illuminated sign cabinet constructed of a blue acrylic face with white text. The sign will be back-lit. No other exterior lighting is proposed. Meeting Date:June 2,2004 Agenda Item:IV.A. J&F Beauty Supply 2004-257-COA 3..14 60 West Atlantic Avenue I �.,u. ANALYSIS u The Board shall consider: SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(1)(a) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Wall Signs" and states: A wall sign is a flush mounted sign and has one sign face. A wall sign shall not project more than eight inches from the wall upon which it is mounted. Types of wall signs are canopy signs, mansard signs, and painted signs. LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings"and states: The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be placed or painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7), however, there are no such restrictions for wall signs. LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) addresses "Sign Area Requirements for Wall Signs in the OSSHAD"and states: Wall signs are to be located on the building face and may not exceed 30 sq. ft. in area. LDR Section 4.6.7(H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (E), which outlines prohibited signs, with respect to height and area. Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Meeting Date:June 2,2004 Agenda Item:IV.A. J&F Beauty Supply 2004-257-COA 60 West Atlantic Avenue Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building façade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the architecture. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts, however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining" and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. One such standard states: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Conclusion The wall sign is appropriate with respect to the style, scale, dimensions, and design as well as in relation to the surrounding commercial signage. The proposed contemporary signage compliments the architectural features of the building as well as the adjacent wall sign. The proposed colors compliment those found on the building and are intended to match the adjacent sign on the building. As the sign area measures 14 sq. ft., the sign complies with the requirement that a wall sign not exceed more than 30 sq.ft. in area. Positive findings can therefore be made with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. F REVIEW:BY OTHERSK....... . .?. -, %.._.&. The Delray Beach Sign Review Committee reviewed and approved the location and sign design and dimensions during its meeting of March 29, 2004. Meeting Date:June 2,2004 Agenda Item: IV.A. J&F Beauty Supply 2004-257-COA 60 West Atlantic Avenue ..-. ALTERNATIVE ACT:ION;S A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA request for 60 West Atlantic Avenue, J&F Beauty Supply, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.6.7.(G)(1)(a), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c) of the LDRs, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. Deny approval of the COA request for 60 West Atlantic Avenue, J&F Beauty Supply, based upon a finding that the request and approval thereof is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 4.6.7.(G)(1)(a), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c) of the LDRs, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation with the basis stated. RECOMMENDATION , Move approval of the COA request for 60 West Atlantic Avenue, J&F Beauty Supply, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.6.7(G)(1)(a), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c) of the LDRs, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Attachments:Sign Details, Renderings Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner Meeting Date:June 2,2004 Agenda Item: IV.A. 15 ♦ P. FACE COLOR Blue LETTER Flac7frr COPY CowR() White DEPTH 8' CABINET COLOR Blue LETTER STYLE Garamond It _ I ALLOWABLE S.F. - PRDPOSED S.F. 14.00 - 3 :-...._'-:?_-5.1-‘-',,,--r":1-_zi-s-:,'" - ' 'f"-',;.."-!---1 ....: - f a 'i , `r 4 s wi w4-i4-- « __K ma: - _ ,, `- a x 4 r / X l Ok j Y""P33 I3r�r_ Sc/PPLY § fi -- 1 � Y - '', '-'i ...-.7'-:t_-..SV:'.'t,51--"4 --.-''. '..I i''-2'.'''''-':-V; -`-'-i,'?-f,f.if Y-:.'!?..''''.?_:-,'-',.M.,... .:---',`--„..--..-..t3p.---'-... --_-- ,,' . j & F 2-0 BEAUTY__ „ „_________ _ _____,_.._,______ _ ft, _ __ _ _______._=c,___ ___, _________ . ___ _ s s...1_. .,..„1„, __ _ _____ .__ .,,__ _ ____„ff. . 1_:::"= 4 ,' .111„ _,' , ___,.„- . _,,, : .4 • _ _ _ _w____ _.._,_. _ 7_ -_J_:___ ,7 . _. Scale 3/"=1'-O" __ _ Internally Illuminated Cabinet Sign _= - f = Featuring A Pan Formed Embossed :acrylic Face Scale %"-T-O" Internally Illuminated Cabinet Sign Featuring A Pan Formed £ Embossed Acrylic Face Jos TITLE:J F Beaten SUPPLY DATE: 03-03-06117 This drawl cone rendering & g e.,5 are the . ~Y \! D. �i o�s DATE 03l06103 '� of P ^ Client Approval Date - 3 0 exclusive property Art Sign Company,Inc. And �� - - ADDRESS:SO WEST ATLANTIC AVE, may not be shown to any person or corporation f DRAWN BY:RED outside the clients organization. Nor are they tobe 835 NW6thAve., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33311 Property Owner Approval Date BOYNTON BPS, in anyway,shape or form without the SHEET#:2 reproduced p nl 954.763.4410 0 954.763.2736 SALES REP:SHARI expressedwrittenconeentofArtsignCompany,ln. (salesrep)@artsignfi,com °> www.artsignfl,com - , ... - Ct'-8"--I ALL SECONDARY WIRING 15 WITHIN U/L WIRING RACEWAYS P,ER NEC 600-31 1' GENERAL MOTES&SPECIFICATIONS - (1)20 AMP CIRCUITS)REQ'D (1)20 AMP DISCONNECT SWITCHES BREAKER# -, ,-:.. :...,' ,.,. - - ,- _ ►' ♦ _ •Electrical,Si na 6-Hool u To.Existin ElectricaLAs f er-:.. . , — • ♦ 9 9 p- 9 '_ LN ELE .L.COMPONENTS ARE /L L AND - A L CTIZICA U 15TED .063 Aluminum Skin Overt WI x 11/2"x 3/16" a��+�: NEC 600-21;#-12 Min.lnside'fi" Min.Type RW Flexible A U/L LABEL APPEARS ON THE SIGN..IT IS GROUNDED Aluminum Angle Frame All Joints Welded Construction Ci♦�i♦+ Aluminum Conduit or E ual • IN ACCORDANCE Wei NEC 250 PRIMARY-N0.12 THHN.THWN(�R AWN IN 1fz"D[A +. �' WIRING RACEWAY TO EXISTING CIRCUIT PROVIDED NEC 600-21 Retainer System Fasten To Signage Frame Wrth r + , 1/2"MIN TYPE RW 1'LEXIBLE ALUMINUM.CONDUIT #10 x 17/8 Min.Positive Fasten Screws2001 •I►�♦ ♦• FOBR� APPROVED EQUAL.U/L APPROVED IN-LINE FUSES PER ' ► ♦�►�♦♦ DRAIN HOLES IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEC 600-8 • ��♦•+� i • SUPPLIED ELEC.CIRCUIT/12 OV./2 0 AMP. DISCONNECT SWITCHES IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEC 600-2 . ,,, j ENGINEERED TO WITHSTAND 140 MPH WIND VELOCITIES 1/8" Min. Plexiglas Face a ; <- i ►♦ ♦+ 1 Groundingand Bonding As Per NEC 250 #12 Min. ♦+`♦♦+ I 9 AND WIND LOADS OF 65 LB.P5F `'�i♦i♦+ I - THHN,THWN,AWG Copper Wire As Required NEGATIVE PRESSURE=-65 LB.PSF S')♦,4 1 POSITIVE PRESSURE=+62 L .P5F ++• `• DISSIMILAR MATERIALS TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 2001 •♦♦♦♦ • I GROUNDING&BONDING PER NEC 250. ♦ ♦+ #12 THHN.THWN,AWG 0-- R WIRE , • �+�%++♦• I U/L Approved In-Line Fuses As Per SFBC 450.48 Requirements; E MARKING,VOLTS LAMPS LABEL PER NEC 600-4. Internally Illuminated With 800 MA Hi-Output `:+�♦`♦� ( ELK 10;250 Volt 10 Amp 448H Listed DEDICATED SIGN CIRCUIT ON LISTED TIME CONTROL DEVICE Lamps at 12"O.C.as Required �♦�♦�o�o. i AS PER FBC 2001 ♦♦♦+++♦ DESIGN FABRICATION&INSTALLATION MEETS ORIEXCEEDS +++ice AUL LOCAL,STATE AND NATIONAL CODE REQUIREMENTS Internally Illuminated With 800 MA Hi-Output �� -�♦�� Ballast Wiring As PER 600 and_U/L Specifications;Use l +♦ NEC 2a002 CODE;FBC 2001;WUL 48 STANDARDS +♦ . 600 Volt-Min.#12 THH N As-Required . MEETS WIND LOAD LOADS REQUIREMENTS Lamp Ballasts As Per NEW-32 Requirements ♦i♦+o♦ OFAse>=_.7-98 0 wo MPH= osuRE C yi+i+♦, , "C> .o♦♦j♦♦♦� Mounted To Fascia System'With 3/8"x 1-7/8" Min. ��♦�♦♦. Expansion Anchor✓; C4-SPACED EVENLY) —53 Minimum U/L Approved Wireways _►.!�♦.�. As Per NEC 600-31 r ►�-I.44 �.. 2 O ��+++♦ . _µ " Minimum Drain Holes N 'AY i♦i♦i♦ NEC 600-8 Requirements �♦♦♦+♦+♦• U/L Approved;Weather Proof 20 AMP Electrical Service _ . r♦oo+i+i Disconnect Switch As Per NEC 600-2 Requirements ?• . • Not To Scale ♦! oo . . 4211 Underwriters Laboratones Inc. Section Detail Flush Mount Cabinet Sign; _ -. QTY. Ballasts AMPS Total AMPS Installation: Sleeve Anchors - . , , - • 'ENGINEER PE26818 Tong Le i'E,Inc. Circuit Requirements - `Consulting Structural Engineers 5100 W.Copans P.A.II00 Tong Le,President #of Circuits Required Total Amps Margate,Florida - . - (954-)974-6560 - #of 20 Amp Disconnect Switches . m,e a rr - • r-'. D 0,.. 9 OT : L:o J` �` r e m - Breaker#: Panel o � 02000 Jbtle �I" ale ine�dustve ProPor v«A1 Jbei 4 - ODWG # 2k- Address COMP ANY co,hoc ar +no ,b« a ,,,t,eo 'SCALE: NONE c tens otgantzaiion nor are they to be ©3" l O- u- PAGE:2 OF 2 835 NW •:.. MERE., FT.Lam. FLORIDA 33311 zeProduced In a<*r wai.shape or torm g DRAWN BY: RED Sales Rep. (PHONE) � 10 (FAX) a7 3- , ` ''''''C0r' ''o' ' / Q'-8"A ALL SECONDARY WIRING IS WITHIN U/L WIRING RACEWAYS PER NEC 600-31 GENERAL NOTES&SPECIFICATIONS (1)20 AMP CIRCUIII(S)REQ'D- (1)20 AMP DISCONNECT SWITCHES / � BEAKER •, - '.:- op4 ; ',Electrical Si na v Hookup To Existing Electrical-AS Per• PANEL. ALL ELECTRfcAL COMPONENTS ARE U/L LISTED AND .063 Aluminum Skin Over 1'/2"x 1 '/"x 3/16" h♦e♦0 NEC 600-21;# 12 Min.Inside lk"Min.Type RW Flexible A U/L LABEL APPEARS ON THE SIGN.IT 15 GROUNDED Aluminum Angle Frame All Joints Welded Construction `��♦j ,• Aluminum Conduit or E uai IN ACCORDANCE VJIiTH NEC 250 PRIMARY-N0.12 TIiHN.THWN OR AWN 1N'fz"DlA ♦♦♦• ♦♦�! . WIRING RACEWAY TO EXISTING CIRCUIT PROVIDED NEC 6oQ-21 Retainer System Fasten To Signage Frame With _ ♦♦�i♦O� 1/2"MIN.7YPE RWIIEXIBLE ALUMINUM.CONDUIT �♦♦♦ ' OR U/L APPROVED EQUAL.U/L APPROVED IN-LINE FUSES PER #10 x 1718"Min.Positive Fasten Screws �1_:♦�♦♦�♦�♦� 1 FgC 2001 e" 44 ! DRAIN HOLES IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEC 60.0-8 V•♦ j i SUPPLIED ELEC.CIRCUIT/12 OV./2 0 AMP_ DISCONNECT SWITCHES IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEC 600-2 �1♦�♦♦♦� j ENGINEERED TO WITHSTAND 140 MPH WIND VELOCITIES 1/8" Min. Plexiglas Face : ►♦♦y♦♦♦� Grounding and Bonding As Per NEC 250 #12 Min. AND WIND LOADS OF 65 LB.PSE 4♦••• 4 1< THHN,THWN,AWG Copper Wire As Required I NEGATIVE PRESSURE=-65 LB.PSF �'j*♦♦♦�♦� ` POSITIVE PRESSOR =+62 L .FSF ►1♦♦♦♦ • DISSIMILAR MATERIALS TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FCC 2001 ♦�♦�♦♦♦j t I GROUNDING&BONDING#'ER NEC 250. ��.♦i♦i� U/L A••r�Dved In-Line Fuses As Per SFBC 4�0.48 Requirement; ' #12 THHN,THWN,AWG COPPER WIRE ♦♦♦♦ MARKING,VOLTS/AMPS LABEL PER 1GIFC 600-4. ♦♦♦♦ 'I DEDICATED SIGN CIP.CUIT ON LISTED TIME CONTROL DEVICE Internally Illuminated With 800 MA Hi-0 •ut `♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� ! ELR i0;250 Yolt 10 Amp DISH Listed i�� ASPERFCC2001.- Lamps at 12"O.C.as Required ♦ii♦ • ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦. I DESIGN FABRICATION&INSTALLATION MEETS ORIE(CEEDS rii( All LOCAL,STATE AND NATIONAL CODE REQUIREMENTS Internally Illuminated With 800 MA Hi-0 •ut Ballast V�firi As FER 600 and U/L 5• ifications;Use I NEC 2002 CODE;Fac 2001;V&48 STANDARDS LampBallasts As Per NEW-32 Requirements ! 1;1/.4, 600 VoltMin.#12 THHN As-Required 1 MEETS WIND LOAD LOADS REQUIREMENT5 OF ASCE-.7-98 0 140 MPFh WOSURE C I!.*o��►♦♦�� Mounted To Fascia System With 3/8"x 1-7/8" Min. ` . ��♦♦ 4 - (4-SPACED EVENLY) �. Expansion Anchor; 33 Minimum U/L • •moved Wtrew- ,� •.♦� : a li As Per NEC 600-31 I ©' �i.:• .-4.i• ♦♦ ti r♦♦♦♦♦♦♦Q -, '/A" Minimum Drain Holes C•i*.ii ►♦♦♦♦ NEC 600-8 Requirements U/L A.•n0ved;;Weather Proof 20 AMP Electrical Service ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦! ♦♦i! 'Disconnect Switch As Per NEC 600-2 Requirements eiiii - Not To Scale .. ♦♦, 42) Underwriters Laboratories Inc. listed Section Detail Flush Mount Cabinet Sign; - QTY. Ballasts AMPS Total AMPS Installation: Sleeve Anchors - ► x . - 'ENGINEER PE26818 Tong Le PE,Inc. Circuit Requirements \Consulting Structural Engineers 5100 W.Copan U./H00 Tong Le,President #of Circuits Required _ Total Amps Margate,Florida (954-)974-65560 #of 20 Amp Disconnect Switches c• - . � _. .6_ .. 1. a crl" 1M r ter, : Breaker n .... ., . B k�r#_ Panel,.0o DATE: 06/19/2000 Job Title: ��f; ►«e„� aaty« ,on Z.g DWG # 2k- C�!)fiz 4 co kic and mrn/not be st�onn to SCALE: NONE Address COMPAI11-'Y" arry /o«poratton outside the o ciionls o,goazation nor cue they to be a .7~ 1 Q_ '_- PAGE: 2 OF 2 • 835 H'i 0 'tb AVENUE, FT.LAUD. FLORDA 33311 repur4rad in a,v war.shape or mto m DRAWN 13Y: RED Sales Rep. (PHONE) 463 10 (FAX) M3-27 �e'awcaten Mntar DCiRAYB A H ` - DELWYBFACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD >u1e�d IIP.' MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT �'IIp: 13J3 2001 1001 Agent: Bright Image Sign Systems Project Name: The Rectory Project Location: 14 South Swinton Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD,__ .._..._ The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a wall sign on a contributing property, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J) and 2.4.7(B). B:ACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 11, Block 61, Town of Delray and is located on the west side of South Swinton Avenue approximately 80' south of Atlantic Avenue. The property is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). Constructed in 1912 as the Rectory for the City's first Methodist Church, the two-story frame vernacular building is considered a contributing property within the Old School Square Historic District. During its meeting of October 15, 1997, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and approved the site plan and design elements (including the installation of a handicapped accessible parking space) for the rehabilitation of the Rectory Building. This proposal included the construction of an ADA accessible ramp at the rear of the property. Relocation of the ramp to the front of the building was reviewed and approved by the Board on February 18, 1998. On July 1, 1998, the Board reviewed and approved the Certificate of Appropriateness (COA 327) for an exterior paint change, change of roof material, and installation of shutters. The proposed improvements were undertaken. At its meeting of February 19, 2003, the HPB recommended approval of the installation of a free-standing sign associated with the Rectory Building. As the installation of the sign required approval of a waiver to permit more than one type of sign within the development, the Board recommended approval of a waiver to the City Commission. The City Commission approved the waiver on April 1, 2003. Meeting Date:June 2,2004 Agenda Item:IV.B. The Rectory 2004-266-COA 14 South Swinton Avenue .PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is for the installation of a wall sign for a retail establishment. Located within the front-facing gable of the building, the wall sign measures 96.05" (8'.05") in length, 22.25" (1'10.25") in height, and 14.89 sq. ft. in area. The proposed sign will be constructed of MDO (Medium Density Overlay) and displays a chamfered edge border. The sign face is constructed of raised sign foam letters. The sign face will be painted a dark brown with a white border. Dimensional sign foam will be used to create "The Rectory" text and will be painted pink to match the building. The wall sign is intended to match the existing free-standing sign affiliated with this location. No lighting is proposed with this project. The proposal includes a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) to allow more than two signs per lot, parcel, or development. ANALYSIS T a' The Board shall consider: SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(1)(a) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Wall Signs" and states: A wall sign is a flush mounted sign and has one sign face. A wall sign shall not project more than eight inches from the wall upon which it is mounted. Types of wall signs are canopy signs, mansard signs, and painted signs. LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) addresses "Sign Area Requirements for Wall Signs in the OSSHAD"and states: Wall signs are to be located on the building face and may not exceed 30 sq. ft. in area. LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and states: The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be placed or painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7); however there is no height limitation for a wall sign. The Rectory 2004-266-COA 14 South Swinton Avenue LDR Section 4.6.7 (H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (E) with respect to height and area. Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building facade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the architecture. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts, however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining" and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. One such standard states: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, The Rectory 2004-266-COA 14 South Swinton Avenue and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. WAIVER ANALYSIS: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7), not more than one of any type of sign nor more than two signs are permitted per lot, parcel, or development. The applicant has requested a waiver to this requirement to allow a wall sign in addition to the two free- standing and two under canopy signs approved for this development. Four signs total currently exist on the property. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; and, d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Existing signs on the property consist of two free-standing signs and under canopy signs. Therefore the proposed sign is the first wall sign requested. Each building and sign on the parcel has a unique architectural style and each sign reflects the historic nature of the property as well as the architecture of the individual contributing buildings, which are utilized for separate business establishments. Given the above, the waiver request will not adversely affect the neighboring area or grant a special privilege as the request is unique to the property and is necessary in order to convey the establishment's identity from South Swinton Avenue. The design of the sign and the proposed copy is more reflective of a name plate rather than an identification sign. No public facilities will be diminished and no unsafe situations will be formed by the granting of this waiver. Thus, positive findings can be made to recommend to the City Commission approval of the waiver request for the installation of an additional sign on this parcel. While the applicant is proposing to install more than one sign on this parcel, given the historic nature of the property, the unique architectural style of each building on the parcel and design of each sign, and that individual contributing buildings are utilized for separate business establishments, positive findings can be made to support the recommendation to City Commission for the waiver request for the installation of an additional sign on this parcel. Conclusion The wall sign is appropriate with respect to the style, scale, dimensions, and design as well as in relation to the surrounding commercial signage. The proposed signage will The Rectory 2004-266-COA 14 South Swinton Avenue not diminish the architectural features of the building and compliments the existing free- standing sign. The sign dimensions and area meet the wall sign requirement of less than 30 sq. ft. (14.89 sq. ft. area) as required by LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7). Positive findings can therefore be made with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7, the City's Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards upon approval of the waiver by the City Commission. K REVIEW BY OTHERS Review of the project by the Delray Beach Sign Review Committee is anticipated on June 1, 2004. Comments regarding the review will be conveyed to the Historic Preservation during its meeting of June 2, 2004. ALTERNATIVE -ACT-ION=S A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA request and move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission of the request for waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) to permit more than two signs on one lot, parcel, or development at 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c) of the LDR's, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA for the installation of a wall sign recommend denial of the waiver to the City Commission for 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(a), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation with the basis stated. .,... ,. . ..._. .. - RECOMMENDATION Waiver Request Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission of the request for waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) to permit more than two signs on one lot, parcel, or development at 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.7(B)(5) of the Land Development Regulations. The Rectory 2004-266-COA 14 South Swinton Avenue Certificate of Appropriateness Move approval of the COA request for 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory, Inc., by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7) of the LDR's, and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the waiver to allow more than one sign per lot, parcel, or development is approved by the City Commission. Attachments:Sign Details Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner Description of Work Permit,manufacture and Install one(1)single faced sign to conform to the Historical District sign program per meeting with Jimmy-JA Scale: 1" = 100.62 inches 3ri h t Image SIGN SYSTEMS n COMPLETEI ELECTRICAL S 15-11 1/4 NEON a to'' J�y I COMMTALDES •. - RE9DEMWL DESIGN • a SERVICE „. Y- rct I,,,wq f tiB• n".i ",iN ,.�.• i,,4" 'Tj' a AWARD WINNING 1 W, a na r�+ a DESIGN SIGN AREA 7'2" `` ", ` „ I. 561 278 781 4 6 i 'y, y 1 r+ •' i 7tlk CG!..).n1 rti�'r`'� s 1w �� } k t w d 1 3^.k-- ram" HEIGHT: �i�''�'�„�y�., ,�tri••` I ! � s1r q t 4 . c}'t ,Yr l�r�?,� 561.27II.0259FAX ., ♦ 'f 41 r !� ..:0.1,..: l t y�N, 375 NE Id STREET SIGN AREA 16'WIDTH: , r C r ' 's th'. 4r ; 8›'' ''1=�' ,. r, , i� • 1 C•' � 1° DELPAY BEACH,FLORIDA 33a83 SIGN AREA: 205.2 SQ. FT. ',' l f„ '! ` ` B,, `k•} ,`• (h l,,,,v f� .0i S --,- ALLOWED CNCED m18604 f 1� J S i$, �D r {r A; i•, lorightimage@emi.net SIGN LENGTH: 80.5 `ohs;) ,L, trlf i 1 a� ,044 �. u��sted 4 ^' nth a * ,t, �G "s I. q �' .. rrt, fit. co SIGN HEIGHT: 1' 10.25" ',! � d,�:;.°��it� , r 4� ��-, r_ sine 1979 OVERALL SIGN AREA: 14.87 SQ• FT. • • I 'ai :j Y* 7 1 !'J,lr �.(. " 0.1 CUSTOMER . liti k', ,," T• r.. II Y0 ,,a E t, '� , 1su, , THE RECTORY 1+a x ,r 4,�� t, I I f; r Y.. Q,4 9 4�,i3 ,< 4 ,; r t3 or tL 4aa... DATE Proposed sign photo simulation scale: 100.62 032204 DRAWN BY: —Joe illIMMEIMIlk DRAWING NOTE: Due to limitations of the printing process, 0f 2 printed colors can vary from actual colors. 2 Bright Image,Inc.1999 This is an aiginar,unpublished drawing,submitted with a project we are planning for you.It is not to be copied,reproduced,exhibited or shown to anyone outside your orgenizabcn wrlhout written permission of BrI�II Image,Inc. , , �� „�y� ,r Y �Mt 3right r , , erJ , },,� � f, r r made � �a �� / t y e ,s ��jr� ll.fil y 4 1' �I 1 Y,pp Tr 5 1 9 .-pra{h... :Ill, h "tr v: a r M - 1 '� rr Air e�7 a + Ir r., r a SIGN SYSTEMS i a t A.yf...."�'' wWK II"h G rY } 1 r 1 I Y Jr 1 + Y 4 ,p � tlgY:t�, 4�' o-1 + +•u�` ,�,�,�, DIN.SPIAYS E ELECTRICAL �41G v !Y rs r A'I Ir fI1I RLK �.a Y a�I i I�rl ly 11 ¢ I rl a t:�'rt5 b.rtl I COMMERCV'La�I,j � f �Y} .�';r I ` ��, A„ r r ` : ry .� 1u tify r 1 RESIDE DESIGN } r ' jl !'� E r. r»r�""'r ! 2 y°�} �,�rt F',, ;�� :,,."vr SERVICE A 1}dI ��f 1°� � tl' 'r,l •I 111 eohl �tk�,��,r�l{ y ,lYrP "� lr,�,✓ 'p'fir Y,fy"Ih Sr 4 nr l) P AWAR WWNING 1 + r r I ,,•), ds1+r'w k v DESIGN �� { 1"" { �� 1 I ,Sf nr,�Et r rr�.Y r '� '4' v.. ��wr ,r�M r�'r � q. {+ K�V 1 "r ' T 4`,° 5 t_is I rrh { t .r t. t a+ t 1 r.7!'I,S u.j, ''+ r''� �( �� ' '� b,;,11.y4 ,�1>,iI ^�, k+�� . �� , ,d k � M ;� q ,, 561-278-7814 • y i T ,a ar ttf f� a r a1, q b� Its sd 561.2780259FAX @� '� 'I NZ'''' I�r 4 tiA I�d c. 'yer:Aei j4� 1`�il I ItF p 37RNE3�d5REEr h( �I� 4+ 'IP 4 ..11 t yL,,,,, ,•••1 'y 1{{1M'1.0s1� y',1 ' { °NI 0,r r. DELPAY 6EACH•FLCRIDA 33a 87 t t r4k.r" Ltl DIY„J} V'`i rtli i✓• 1r:�• it 1 w1S�.l t .Y'1iq 411I '1 � 7 �. UCENCED u.18604 l,' �t r 4 I I w r �,I,r r a L el '�MMY �;y tlr14S• �er�e�p tY1�� I• 1 R''4 i �, GS d �i � .�' �1 •F��,•' + rM k g, r..J� �! .,. °�y '�J �+ 1 �yi r gar"$^'. I ....'�i J�s "`iyyl `,�n brightimage@emi.net ' r� J { rrYY y+i t R� t r�.,`�'Eb!w, r : '� r tl �rn'tJ'��"ry-`{t s,�, "� ' t }. r!�• �y! �pk .,:: , U/L.Listed y r� t/ e' w Mf 1 a. Since 1979 aNM' f 'QP. rd r ,. : j� ,fir 'M 1. .w,gkpk h i � fit + � �,•p, �� 11, Y �� r'1ii '.'rigr V'Y"i4d� � 'IrT I u,i i J ( h CUJTQM�� r 5 ti Y! r Y !o •rNS' r �" r+tl�' � > .r r , ,sv��'�'N �'a f �Ilyl'Eyi f. Y .w 4 ,, i d t '.I + ' Lr ( • ' THE RECTORY . 'Dr r"f y ?' T �n 1rW�i!i: ""`� ., 7 N + I ,.ytlrl'Y wr".::::"x `� awl N + VV 't � '!-- ��qq c,, , ! 2,. ,'e` 1 t rs1t��,� L � '.�&; �� .., V t iijjIt P Y y x 43t A l n"; f� �I 1 r r sl t i `.J, X 6I'S P, Y -r Q, 1 1 u A t � : � r `fT 5" �sl -'r;C PiY �..�5 �t rp{I� � y �, h.��d f 'n.�,.� 1�li� it � �kii.,..1.' r l, �� t b.. ''� ° t,i ' ' Yr�+"ih ( ✓Y,t dr` { Z d{.n•u- AWI { � '. t 1 r r r r .r+ x r pr I , f 1iir�L"e, {, ��,.. r &+l�r�� , IPlwrr T' l (d 1Y ',n' DATE ENLARGED SIGNAREA--NOT TO SCALE! 111,,,,,,:i;.;;;;4::.,i,j,,,',;.,..;,:„. ; f `� � �� ' �' 03-22-04 ry "*ram^"° ' t&r ° r I ti r DRAWN BY: ' .� � r 1'.�>t� �^r � "�'I`9 if { y ! tl x n '{ 1ti{ Joe yyP �lirr r "" I y1 ' ' � ''3 ,� Il ,R{ � 10 1 !{ p 1 I '>, a t .dt'°� k ak a Y . r ,��I, y I rs Oy , L t� ICJ�4M i trYr,�•a +r 'I!, r �rt�� 3Nr l �rd��V:Yy� � r�� 9� 1t,`T'_CPy t �, ` j� 4', 1rI It' Ifd. ' Fx^ 6 y f�q, k rt � y p r� �71J I .�� JII rR 1 `i 'ti'S1 tl b DRNG � Ir :rkl�wq �.frrtv1:40lild1�f -� r ' aa* �. x NOTE: Due to limitations of the printing process, 1 of printed colors can vary from actual colors. s Bright Image,Inc.1999 This is en aigvTal,unpublished drawing,submitled'�ith a project we are planning fa you.if is not to be copied,r�Yroduced,exh�ited shown to enyme autsdeycur agonize ion without iitten pamission of Bright Imaye,Inc. �, Ft£, s ,e {INSTALLATION DETAIL }„`„,,, ,rFsr,M d- ,...,„,,,.,,,t,,,,,,„,„.„,:4',.',,,,x.,., NOT TO SCALE �u Existing building face 1/2" MDO primed with KI LZ and painted..__...______.__._ T,s a7 :"4 +, ` SW 1232 Brown back ground , 4 (t 5 Raided 1/2" MDO border primed with KILL---_--- and painted with White One Shot °'?e.- }. 9, Raised 1/2"sign foam letters._ primed and painted to match ' ` % d r c z ,#s rr existing building color and mounted , ; a -,i`r with 1"screws with anchor sleeves r. r r 1 , ' it ,1E fZ S P w4 { ., 1 ]�y^ qyy9 j t J,, {2 1 T Z ti,a ' 4 ,4;tk d CO,,4i I -'U,° a{,t i9 'x •.r„V 41 t t 1q 1, f }. 11 M, 9x1' i";F.# 41 ARt ,ice d { y�yql; 4 :4: {1 y 444 d o-, t ` a �rr).;r � y 4 p a. sr1 04(UY14ACN ..z .. .. .. ,,; DRHAYOWCH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT 1 J'J3 '001 1001 2001 Agent: Kim Donovan Project Name: Donovan Residence Location: 144 NW 3rd Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of decorative shutters and storm protection on a contributing residence; pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUNDIPROJECT;DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of the east 50' of Lot 9 and the east 50' of the north 54' of Lot 10, Block 35, Town of Delray. The property contains a 1,472 sq. ft., one-story, frame vernacular, single family residence constructed in 1925. The property is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-A) and is considered a contributing building within the West Settler's Historic District. There are no recent actions by the Board pertaining to this property, however, a new asphalt shingle roof was approved administratively on May 10, 2004. The current proposal involves the installation of decorative fiberglass and aluminum board and batten shutter with shutter dogs and removable aluminum, storm panels for all the windows throughout the contributing building. The shutters will be installed flanking each window on the dwelling and dimensioned according to the size of the opening. The shutters will be permanently fixed to the window frame and will be held in place with shutter dogs. The storm panels consist of imbricated, corrugated aluminum panels that will attach to the dwelling via tracks or channels at the base of the opening and will be bolted directly to the building at the top. Panels will be installed on the approach of a storm and will be stored when not in use. ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: Meeting Date: June 2,2004 Agenda Item: IV.C. 144 NW 3`d Avenue,Storm protection '. West Settlers Page 2 The Board Shall Consider: (E)(8)(g) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. Delray Beach Design Guidelines The following is a list of recommended treatments with respect to decorative shutters: • Shutters should be operable or appear to be operable. • Shutters should be designed so they measure the full height and one-half the width of the window frames. • "Shutter dog"hardware should be used to enhance the appearance that the shutters are operable. • Shutters should be attached to the window casing rather than the exterior finish material. • Shutter details should compliment the construction material and architectural style of the property on which they are applied. For example, wooden raised panel shutters and board and batten shutters are frequently used in wood frame house. The following is a list of recommended treatments with respect to hurricane protection: • Window shutters that are removable are preferred. • If the tracks are to be installed year-round, they should be painted to match the exterior surface. Analysis The installation of the proposed removable storm panels on a contributing historic building can be supported as they are the least obtrusive form of storm protection. As the tracks require minimal hardware, there is little concern that the installation could irreparably damage the exterior of the building. However, the panels would require the installation of tracks or channels. In order to camouflage the tracks, a condition of approval has been added to paint the tracks to match the color of the building. Further, the installation of decorative board and batten shutters are appropriate for the style of the house as well as the historic architecture in the area. As there is no photo documentation which reflects the original shutters and since shutters are considered a reversible treatment, the use of historically appropriate board and batten style shutters can be supported upon installation of shutter dogs. The project, as proposed, can therefore be supported based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, once the condition of approval to paint the tracks for the storm panels has been met. 144 NW 3rd Avenue,Storm protection West Settlers Page 3 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA request for 144 NW 3rd Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the LDRs and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of the COA request for 144 NW 3rd Avenue based upon a finding that the request and approval thereof is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the LDRs and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA request for 144 NW 3rd Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the LDRs and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the tracks or channels are painted to match the exterior of the building; and, 2) That shutter dogs will be installed. Attachments: Shutter Specs &Detail Report Prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner t Custom Board and Batten Shutters ...Superior Quality! Page 1 of 3 Home About us Site Map Tell a Friend Shutter Products Accessories&Hardware HELP! ORDER NOW! t DECORATIVESIIU TERS.COM An AGI Group Co. • 800-823-6677 • Hours: M-F 8:30 - 5:00 E- ♦ CHECK ON ORDER • CONTACT Us • Fiberglass Shutter Overview • Color Samples • ORDER HARDWARE Fiberglass Shutter Menu Pricing & Ordering • Bahama Shutters • Louvered Shutters • Raised Panel Shutters • Panel/Louvered Shutters •Board & Batten Shutters • Measuring • Installation • Locking Bars • Warranty&Returns Custom Board and Batten Shutters Click on Images to Enlarge. Xi lil 1 11 1 ' : -_ Select a Style... I Austin Memphis Nags Head http://www.decorativeshutters.com/fiberglass_shutters/board_and batten_shutters.html 5/21/2004 Custom Board and Batten Shutters ...Superior Quality! Page 2 of 3 C I I (Bordeaux) (Walnut) (Evergreen) [electI Select) I Select ("(A t------------ N I - I I ( 1 I i J 'T Rockport ) Scottsdale (Wineberry) (Canyon) \\\ 1 i 1 r I Select Select Section Detail N 3V4'± 7I8'± Fiberglass x Cross Rail �t- 1!2 Fiberglass Y Panel -_= 3'.t I irz}{ II is le?', Aluminum Reinforcing Tube • Materials - Panel and Cross Bucks are constructed high-density PVC composite materials. Reinforced with 1" x 1/2" (outside dimension) aluminum tubing imbedded within the panels 7/8" from either side. • Paint Finish - Two-part, automotive-quality, acrylic-urethane finish with hardener. • Size Restrictions - Panel Width: 8" to 48", Length: 12" to 96" • Notes: Hinges are usually applied to the back of the board and batten shutters. They are only visible in their entirety when the shutter is in the closed position. Shutter swing is 3"; be sure to check for proper clearance (i.e., lamps, fixutures)when the board and batten shutter is in the open position. • Click Here for Pricing http://www.decorativeshutters.com/fiberglass_shutters/board_and batten_shutters.html 5/21/2004 M IA M CIE MIAM1-DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA METRO-DADE FLAGLER BUILDING BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICE(BCCO) 140 WEST FLAGLER STREET,SUITE 1603 PRODUCT CONTROL DIVISION MIAMI,FLORIDA 33130-1563 (305)375-2901 FAX(305)375-2908 NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE (NOA) Poma Corporation 9040 Belvedere Road West Palm Beach,FL 33411 SCOPE: i, This NOA is being issued under the applicable rules and regulations governing the use of construction materials. The documentation submitted has been reviewed by Miami Dade County Product Control Division and accepted by the Board of Rules and Appeals(BORA)to be used in Miami Dade County and other areas where allowed by the Authority Having Jurisdiction(AHJ). This NOA shall not be valid after the expiration date stated below. The Miami-Dade County Product Control Division (In Miami Dade County) and/or the AHJ(in areas other than Miami Dade County)reserve the right to have this product or material tested for quality assurance purposes. If this product or material fails to perform in the accepted manner, the manufacturer will incur the expense of such testing and the AHJ may immediately revoke,modify,or suspend the use of such product or material within their jurisdiction. BORA reserves the right to revoke this acceptance,if it is determined by Miami-Dade County Product Control Division that this product or material fails to meet the requirements of the applicable building code. This product is approved as described herein,and has been designed to comply with the High Velocity Hurricane Zone of the Florida Building Code. DESCRIPTION:0.063"Aluminum Storm Panel APPROVAL DOCUMENT:Drawing No.96-47,titled"0.063"Aluminum Storm Panel",sheets 1 through 3 of 3,prepared by Knezevich&Associates,Inc.,dated 3/25/96,bearing the Miami-Dade County Product Control Renewal stamp with the Notice of Acceptance number and approval date by the Miami-Dade County Product Control Division. MISSILE IMPACT RATING:Large and Small Missile Impact LABELING:Each unit shall bear a permanent label with the manufacturer's name or logo,city,state and following statement: "Miami-Dade County Product Control Approved",unless otherwise noted herein. RENEWAL of this NOA shall be considered after a renewal application has been filed and there has been no change in the applicable building code negatively affecting the performance of this product. TERMINATION of this NOA will occur after the expiration date or if there has been a revision or change in the materials,use,and/or manufacture of the product or process.Misuse of this NOA as an endorsement of any product,for sales,advertising or any other purposes shall automatically terminate this NOA.Failure to comply with any section of this NOA shall be cause for termination and removal of NOA. ADVERTISEMENT: The NOA number preceded by the words Miami-Dade County,Florida, and followed by the expiration date may be displayed in advertising literature. If any portion of the NOA.is displayed,then it shall be done in its entirety. INSPECTION:A copy of this entire NOA shall be provided to the user by the manufacturer or its distributors and shall be available for inspection at the job site at the request of the Building Official. This NOA renews NOA#99-0219.01 and,consists of this page 1 as well as approval document mentioned above.The submitted documentation was reviewed by Raul Rodriguez NOA No 02-0417.06 Expiration Date: April 18,2007 Approval Date: May 16,2002 / r.r tit Page 1 �aP• if • ,.71t• PRODUCT NARNNO PROEM'NARNNO , 1 IOC•f10N•1 IWTKIN•L LOCATIONI SW 11 711• SE' �(— I 1'••• 11.••T• n... VL•T/.1/L• f700 H ; „LT• L111• 1.1}• ! a C rank»cDINfOA c[Nt[ .. _J DL TAA.,,DN,1•ALAI"' • • �_1 C0- � ..._._a 111 LLAS' ••ITS•j it Or COVERAGE AY -iiTl-1 t11' ^ u �NL1H c • $ eF 1 O SCALE //L' 0'.1'STORM PANEL O• "h" HEADER SCALE I/L'•.0'.1" O "U" HEADER •SCALE I I/L'•.0'•1' O STUDDED ANGLE SCALE••1/L••0'•1' F� if 1. N : . VYl1 fiii HI— CTT•1 / •»Ou p»TAl •Lu 5i YY rfi IL.er MAN. ♦♦�� ((e��a�f1ma DIME uO�r TIDNAI Lt; V V� £�_� T I p TARSI:+ 1.N1•- 71., OOI HAO NDtT(, El iiii 1,TNS SHUTTER It AMNION ACCORDANCE WITH THE tOU1M W ILONGA N 15-1 SUL0N0 COOL,PPM CONED&.ANO THE Ills SOOWARO COUNTY IO.TION, O5 ANGLE O OPTIONAL ANGLE O WINGNUT t.PNOTCTIOYREOANDEISOCIAIIVEDEiiI.....iWICALiaiAtIONSSH4LLStPERPDRNMD ill? EL] SCALE.1/L'•0'•1' 6 SCALE 1/a"•W.I. SCALE..HALE SIZE AND CT/aR SMUCTUNEt' {MALL SE S1PM0Ncto At A0IROP1,AT[ DEMON LOADS. 1.I1INH PANELS SHALL St ESSt•N11 A111MNW ALLOY.LEAP TWA.WITH J 1 - �I AN P1�IS/POS/ROLLMOP Or IT NIL CA EUI5005 SHOWN SMALL SE S111•,I. W - AIMaAMUA.N. 2 3n • L.PD001NT NASNNOI SHALL It WITHIN or OP ONE 0N0 OP TNC PANEL WITH A INN. a I �'G OP ONE HARNRN/PER PANEL ANO SMALL St SAP/RED AN P0Ll0W,. 1—� MOTH IRILIMITEO Vi01N UML•PII/L AMA CORPOSAt10N = I 1 MR.TO PANEL SRANI I �•• ---/II WEST►ALN lE•CN,RL Q . IN/RP TO OAN[l Sr AMI 1 DACE COVNTY PSDO.A►rl0 0 ::^ _ SECTION ._POP MOUNT —'•-•• I F - SCCIO S.ALL SOLE,ANA WAf0E0■SHALL SE 0ALOANICD 00.I ANIESI STEEL WINE A N 'S t• 'W _ .�_S TOPS0MONIMUOI r/.Tt Kfl = • 1- NI S. TOP l POT TOM OC TAL►SHOWN NAY eE NO[•CHLNOt4 A,POLO CONDITION, 0 OKTAEC PANELS MAY SE HOUMTIO HORIZONTALLY NHERE APPLKARLE. 2 I 73 7.THE OE TAILS ANS SPECNKA T10Nt SHOWS MAIM A0MCSCHI TM Pe00lKES ? �� E1{TED POR PIP AC T.CMMLIC ANO UNIPORM{tATK AN 0RE5SUFO 1OA01NOt . t , N CONFORMANCE NON DADE COUNTY PROTOCOLS PA OIL III AND 103.- ,L r.— PL AN WOW =!N .POtITIVC OCt10N LOAD 1S POE —r •NCOA rive 0[f10N LOAD IS POP ,O GE if • o . < : I.ousou It SAsUD OHETC Tt{t REPORE NA,11•SII OATt01.11•,E. ++ tie • 25 /L `�I:I;I I nwmlcr ecNewcn :•I CPI•. • e T • P .: - P-- e Oil ONNOUN, ', Nuf 1wf7ellAe PRODUCT RENEWED =t,i 111-11YP Attepneoe Ns• •'4a •� p� • tlpted.l D{EI•�/1:1� ACCEPTANCE NO 1 i•0211�.D I re O TYPICAL ELEVATION O TYPICAL ELEVATION — DIRECT MOUNT EZAPF TN • rxrDUTIDNDATE APR/ l 01, ^ a r 0 DIVISION DIIILDRCOCODECOSIPLIANDsoniC6 V.LNNt • 1.1/I• PRAM • MI //' y f }Lj�R/C RC LI ^/NI TENSION PAtTtMl1 ILA 0.t. `/ IK/ \1 K WA* /Af/tNtR6wLLEL•O.C. {1[AN[IINI{CH1 t 10R1 9, 1/L•NAK \` AMC ACII LEA`!AKtNO4 I� •NY ACCIPTAI/t ANCHOR O Ile OVERLAP•'U DOOM . STRUCTURE K NC YIITN Pit Ills ;,11 v • AL AReu tteslRlt P at' srRuciVR[ Of r•t'•.Mr ESN.TO I AL.ANGLE Millet Pact, SOWN(fall ENO coot t•AS••MrKAN. I••I'A Mr MN.10 Q, I/NEN I'•Vas.aS•MAX. DAT :i;•..i J' 1,56 •", 1 . wN AT 10,0,IIIOTI»1t • tY I. l ,S A M PRODuc►CONTROL ahslDN PLAN VIEW • �. solo Lvr•r.o Bccipr CODE COIAPIIAIICE OFFIC A96.c/ ACCfPiANtf NO, m L-U i•T 1 .••'1 01100 STUOC Tull ON COME.rr► no ISII(OP AM[NOR fLN10UL11 , •--~—40P►SO1TOM OI LAO 001 SC A TOP,10►•SOf10N ISII ANCMOR •Tam 1I 11110 • • 'OP.TOP I SO•TOM A r , • 1 l'O1•�. I I/..IS MALWMt BOLT .� awr wwlYO ,ITT. y•� I I) 0) 1/L•MAX. 10.►/Of TON • O a•••--.. • _ • • I••, 1/�'MAY. -_—'_ u O cam t. —y : ; , ...MO irwcr R11 tr►.re► 1 SOTTOM t/ Q tc;i PUN ION P4 I� " # MRI.IAAARATr PROM ii : 11,..3OMtt•1.fA• IS► 0 GLASS•7•l/P # 0 WO i• OGLIIAOOORI , GLA{I Q NM. 10M I _•• OR 0000 I + GLASS y olooeRI fROMaAtf.t.1/.• M �' ��; H s' • I • I i �I� N i ' O .v.•711.ACNRK SGLI 1� • 11 (Ow. I 1WIMWIr••[•GA [ ,•� _ _ __i► ?•' �1•^ roe SIVOGLb MOIL SOIN Ilir' il" -• 11•. rdidi iM Ia01rONW111n•OC. I `.1• ul•a MACMOn Sat 'f �pl r •WINOMIT•Aar y{ 3.f, L- L_.-__ _ 1.L _ - • •. I,, ,I •�_•� POO 11110010 AIMS Ba1N N }-.2.19 • Tor•SOtroN Uit}11•o.t. = dyyaiAA� IIt tYnt•q l,j"IR�.I • SONS '/._fl NACMNI S0.T !DO[air STRUC IURL , f i4l • •O0 tIUUI •"O.C. • ��• It ftA C ORICCWL/1 i V • COP•SOITON U{t tI IT O C. •• w %—• (YMT1N0 SMucNA1 - ••L1Y111.1 STRUL11A1 110♦ 1 CI0SUR1410.011(t(LAN VN WI t 3S ANOU TO WALL OtTAII PANIC.TO ANOLt MAIL •} toils,-KAO(M0 L�.•/,..AMMer Sl 05(0 M1 LlN•MCAII M w11M 1Nt O1TAA. r i 141' A WALL MOUNT SECTION © CEILING/INSIDE MOUNT SECTION C BUILD-OUT MOUNT SECTION o r /; SCALC.f'•1'.e' ICALI f••a 1•.0^ ~ 1r• O iGAlt.1".1'.0• N F. 1 F s iss J • w000 lR11•NO M t 1IPARATON PROM Z I' GLASS•1.11, ? WON*AN PAS TtCR •. -.I[NSMN PAS1tNO •Utl BAWL CAIM•N 1![f AKNOR SCK01N[I OF WOOD BUSNIMO I(CIw?USC 0.R '� ► fY.TOR►SOT1M 4 • OLAS{ 1Y1111N0 Af••OS.OA It•Oc.00 NOf Yit wKl[ OR 000R 11RUCIUR/ i[Mt OYIt(00 PA011 I(IS IMAN•' 1[(t AIKMOR 1N e 3CKOUL[POl PA{t[NIA 1PlfS►{•ACPIW �jJJ f rrr iM►Iowan PNODIIGTR►NCWEp 4 1 = tad[ I limii R ' 1 ' LJI tlNritlnDw I:I;• T( IDi ItlC d 1ST.- CIL0000 •• GLASSI I o = PRODUCT RENEWED ?i . . UAL{ / ••••••oN PROM p L/,I QL CONT. I Y ACCEPTAA'CRNo.q9•��Iq• O I q �? 1 GLAY•a•f/a• • MN. 10N PROM { bill, GLASS•1.1/a• • •y EXPIRATION DATE MIL 19•1M9 i 3: 1 •u•o.c W/I.vr • ; PRO NTROT,DIVISION ' V.1.10410•01 PtW1uATYMI Nro woof BUILDING CODR COAIPILINCE Wl'kE aantM • tR i At No t 0 Ott Y•••ON Oi I.La•I NlMAtMIN �CaMT. •WO IY[MSIt BaT w000 COME. M tINtIR OP{TIA1a ►WIIMM1f S•O.C. POO STVOol0 ATOM Bath WOOD PMMMO too►some'ON•Tr 0t. ri.T.Tof yR1L ENS BarAL NAY 1N wm APPROVED AS WEB , TM 1Hf R 0.. ANOLI TO WALL OCTAR PANtL TO ANGU OCTAIL Af TM oN[0IT0N OP 0AMlat. I A -- - -- - .. , .. [wartyilRutTult SOUTHELORHEI 2�' •coxQ' .•1• lingo MOM W[OP TM MAC IS LIMN TO.II PIP. DAT :I:• .. 109 '' m••ryi'•••+•M O WALL MOUNT SECTION O WALL MOUNT SECTION IBOTTOM) O WALL MOUNT SECTION eT �� `•5;.:. OCALL•C'•1...0. MALT,1•.-.e• moot) CONTROL DIVISION • (DIRECT MOUNT) 00110100 CODE COM?tJANCL Offlcf 96.47 ICALO I I••t'.o- AccPTmcf HO95-O 610./)6 --, ---. • 0 4 • "Y ' ANCIOJR SCHEDULE 2" EDGE DISTA,•t:E ttwfroN rasroN aNt411 FASTENER SPACING REQUIRED FOR fwuR VARIOUS DESIGN LOADS IINCHlSI • EXISTING • S TRUC TUB[ COMM.! IT•uf Nlllt ANCHOR U'MM. IC1.-:-:-. DESCRIPTION 1/4"11TW TAPCON WI 1/4"/RAWL ZAMAC NAIL-IN I/L"•BAWL CALK•IN I QCOwf 0 v I-VS"MIN EMBEDMENT WI 1•I/I`MIN.EMBEDMENT W/7/S"MIN.EMBEDMENT > Maim rOR%CH V • "OM 47.S P5P 62 PEf SS PEP 47.5 PEP 62 PSf SE PEP 47.E REF 62 PSP IS PEP Ittt ANCHOR tfw(Dut[I 2 S N [PAN IL MAX. MAX. MAX. MAX. MAX MAX, MAX. MAX. MAX. I �,�K I�'• {WUTE 9 e. a 5'•/-MAX. 11 ,] 11 Il '12 10 12 Ix M L Ta.}O NACMPK B , S F� yF N u /uJ Il /,:/ a 1: ,7 1x /11/ 8�' u� �wNOMutP.-0°�. , t. i M I /! 12 / = O . ` 1•-1"MAX, tx 11 1 ,2 3 7 17 17 12 •1.74 gi =wg_ < If 1t ♦ Ii 11 B 12 10 7 MN : r STRUCTURE HOLLOW BLOCK WOOD i ANGLAIS•i•1/A• m IIIr r n� Q� qq�� ,, y� i�� q,.,� 1 'tl 3r it I ANCHOR M'� >—V--� Op 1!� I 11111I >! Y -`T,' EI I DESCRIPTION I/L••ITW TAPCON WI 1/4"•RAWL 2AMAC NAIL•IN I/4`P RAWL CALK-IN 1/L`•W000 LAG SCREW 7/NY WOOD EV HMO W • �, gf4,�P BJ MAC .•41�'...I:'mot' ..1.1/I"MIN.EMBEDMENT WI,.//1"MIN.EMBEDMENT W/7/I`MIN.EMBEDMENT W/1.7/1"MIH,EMBEDMENT W/S//-MH. '" " "' ' I 1 OAO IwI IBM Mt CONNCC?MN0IA•OE USED �u X -E'.p, L7.5 PEP 62 PEP SS PEP 47.S PEP 62 PEP /S PEP L7.S PEP 67 PEP IS PEP 47.5 POP 62 PEP IS PEP 47.5 POP 62 PIP /S PEP AT TOO OR•ot ton OF PAWL, y f (PAN DI �X, MAX MAX MAX. MAX MAX. MAX MAX, MAX. MAX. MAX. MAX, MAX. MAX. MAX. 2 I¢ IsI S'•■",MAX 17 • a • a IS 1] I 12 12 12 12 17 11 Y Has: /u 12 • ': 12 I' 12 n I /] u H v ,: a WALL MOUNT SECTION —'-'—`g —' • /��j �� •'.E-MAX, I 6 4 7 5 A 10 7 S 12 12 12 12 11 ,0 © SCALE 1"•t••0•• W . 11 I a 1] /0 7 • 7 S 17 1 7 1x 72 1D 2 • n }" 4INtl ANCHOR SCHEDULE 3" EDGE DISTANCE rt1IRIN o • Ili 1NEAN FASTENER SPACING REQUIRED FOR LNCAR N ' $;p VARIOUS DESIGN LOADS(INCHES) = Y EXISTING PROM 0 •1N ILL• ~ • STRUCTURE • CONCRETED rillk ; I ) �� E _ ANCHORTIAWL �� O DESCRIPTION ILL",1 ITW TAPCON W/ ,/L`•RAWI ZAMAC NAIL-IN 1/L"9 RAWL CALK-IN eCONT. < 1-1//"MIN,EMBEDMENT W/1-1/I"MIN.EMBEDMENT W/7/I"MIN.EMBEDMENT Tv►lOn 70►a • I Bor m CIAO IwI 1.7.S PEP 12 PEP ES PEP 1.73 POP 62 PEP IS PEP 47.3 PEP 62 PEP ES PEP a4tt ICA-},NACh N[60Lr DP ODOR-••• a MMONNr P,•0.0 PO4; C I SPAN II MAX MAX MAX, MAX, MAX. MAX. MAX, MAX. MAX. OCONt, I Na IMAM ANTRA BrN TOP ANO.O1/OMUat I P tt OCS'-I"MAX 12 12 2 If17 1f ,7 ,x If II ; IL.t2 ti tI 17 �1t/1i If ,7 ,1 /: tx 10 7 ,i ,] 17 I'-1`MAX. "[Ii I 1' ;I;�%1 /2 12 1212 12 12 12 12 12 VL•12NAENNt BOLT 10 •I EXISTING I L Nut p N•S.C. E..'; I i STRUCTURE HOLLOW BLOCK WOOD p,� ,�0 ENKbro Mime I PAATINIR - ANCHOR y� 1=0 —j traumas IEEE ANCHOR ICICRAtl A 4L�1 O� ; At Y Xi�0�� MI DESCRIPTION 1/4.6 ITW TAPCON WI 1/l"•BAWL 2ANAC NAIL•M/ 1/4"0 RAWL CALK-IN 1/4"„WOOD LAG SCREW III.1 E.f�MA�MNE SC[W 1.Ill"MIN EMBEDMENT W/1.1/I"MIN.EMBEDMENT WI 7/5"MIN.EMBEDMENT W/I-i/E`MIN,EMSCOMEIIT WI 015 MIN.EMBED. MOIL THIS COIN[CLON HAY B[IMO AT COP OA BOTTOM Of PANELS. ta:WRY ..D ,,b,i47.5 PEP 62 PEP Of PIP 47.5 PIP 62 PEP IS PEP L.7•S PEP 62 PEP IS PEP 1.7.1 PEP Si PEP SS PEP 47• 62 PEP ES PEP SPAN ILI �A X. MAX. MAX. MAX. MAX. MAX. MAX MAX. MAX. MAX. MAX MAX. MAX.X, MAX MAX ALT. BUILD-OUT MOUNT SECTION v.A R/ttEVKN S'4"MAX. 8 10 IS 7 10 tT 12 ,1 17 11 17 12 12 12 at7Hu a PPlN 12 11 12 12 12 17 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 17 O SCALE.1••I•-0• 6 �// l 0 11 • 7 11 ,�x 12 1! tf ID P[0 0 a He /'•I"MAX, 12 „ a 12 ,2 1 12 12 10 IT _ 7 12 _ 11 10 , ANCHOR NO►ES, 1. ENTER USING NEGATIVE DESIGN FRODUCTRLNCWWED PRODUCT RENEWED APR 1950 WITH TN[ / R f1996 LOAD IWI AND SPAN ILI FOR SPECIFIC ,an onspp112�150t6�BYI Or Fl•f16R e.,�OPENING 9YIInP CM,' AOCE►rANCENA�;Q1L% l • spUTH ROM. 'I• COD( vnsM 2. MINIMUM EMBEDMENT ANO EDGE DISTANCE • AOOI Ir•N•0 r'I;.Ol. DAI �•• „ 19 '• EXCLUDES WALL FINISH OR STUCCO. ,f/1.1; EXPUTATlO DATE '' ( �� f. WHERE LAD SCREWS P TO NARROW • /, '/ T '•� Os.M �•. FACE OP STUIND FRAMING.FATTENER SMALL �, Hr� Sg1pp •.NITDI DIY:fttM ..,,.• �W , BE LOCH TEO O CENTER Of AAAN STUD. , En6•Y1CORIM/ •••4 •.• L. ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PROIY. CO RULUIVISIUN EUtLDINE COOT COMPLIANCE OFFICE 96-47 ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS ' S[IILDMO COnE COMrl2AHCE UFF7C• E. ACCORDANCE TIONa. ACCEPTANCE N0.9.�'O i • U[LRAY BLACH DLLRAY BLACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 1290 ► MEMORANDUM ;STAFF REPORT �'II�► LK33 100L Agent: Castle Florida Building Corporation Project Name: Mano-a-Mano (fka Tapas) Location: 8 East Atlantic Avenue • ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for the installation of removable storm protection on a contributing building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). ,BACKGROUND The subject property is comprised of .22 acres described as the west 26' of Lot 4 (Less the south 14') and Lot 5, Block 69. The property is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) and is considered a contributing property in the Old School Square Historic District. The property contains a two-story Masonry Vernacular commercial building constructed in 1950. The first floor contains a 2,580 sq. ft. restaurant (recently converted) while the second floor contains a 309 sq. ft. efficiency apartment. During its meeting of August 6, 2003, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and approved a Class Ill site plan modification for the conversion of the first floor from retail to restaurant (while retaining the residential component). Subsequent to the approval, site plan modifications were approved associated with elevation changes to install bi-fold doors and to install hand-painted tile on the front façade. The applicant is now before the Board for review of a COA and associated Class I site plan modification for the installation of removable storm panels. PROJECT DESCRIPTION I ANALYSIS Project Description The project involves the installation of removable steel, storm panels for the storefront windows. The storm panels consist of imbricated, corrugated steel panels that will attach to the building via tracks (or channels) at the top and bottom of the openings. Panels are to be installed on the approach of a storm and will be stored when not in use. The tracks have previously been installed on the building and are currently in place. Meeting Date: June 2,2004 Agenda Item: IV.D. 4 8 East Atlantic Avenue,Storm protection Old School Square Page 2 4. LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(8)(g) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. Delray Beach Design Guidelines The following is a list of recommended treatments with respect to hurricane protection: • Window shutters that are removable are preferred. • If the tracks are to be installed year-round, they should be painted to match the exterior surface. Analysis The installation of the removable storm panels on a contributing historic building can be supported as they are the least obtrusive form of storm protection. As the tracks require minimal hardware, there is little concern that the installation could irreparably damage the exterior of the building. Further, the awning over the window will aid in concealing the tracks from the view of the right-of-way. However, as the panels require the use of mounting tracks and in order to further camouflage the tracks, a condition of approval has been added to paint the tracks to match the color of the building. The project, as proposed, can therefore be supported based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, once the condition of approval to paint the tracks for the storm panels has been met. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA request and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for 8 East Atlantic Avenue, Mano-a-Mano, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the LDR's and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of the COA request and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for 8 East Atlantic Avenue, Mano-a-Mano, based upon a finding that the request and 8 East Atlantic Avenue,Storm protection Old School Square •� Page 3 approval thereof is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the LDR's and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA request and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for 8 East Atlantic Avenue, Mano-a-Mano, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the LDR's and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following condition: 1) That the tracks or channels are painted to match the exterior of the building. Attachments: Shutter Specs Report Prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner i 15.119'(TOTAL W70TH) 12000" 9.119"(TOTAL WIDTH) . I 0 AS APPLICABLE (trrtCTIVE WIDTH) I f___-6 000'(EFFECTIVE WIDTH)---I SHOWN ON MS PRODUCT ENALCATION DOCUMENT(P.ED,) MS BEN VERIFIED FOR GEMENUIPZER COMMPLANCE N D APPLICABLE _� ACCORDANCE WM THME 2001 EDM V O�'THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE -1.500' 4.473" 1.500' 4.473' DESIGN W.AD LOADS SHALL BE DETERMINED AS PER SECTION 1606 OF n ABOVE MENTIONED CODE FOR A BABC WIND (TALISPEED�` ^t.sao'- ,.500- �` 1.soo•� AS BY THE CTION �E smwai PWq W1LL BE MbTALLED.AND FOR A DIRECTIONALITY FACTOR Kd-a85, IN ACCORDANCE MTI ASC£7-98 STANDARD, STORM PANEL'S ADEQUACY FOR IMPACT AND FATIGUE RESISTANCE MS BEEN VERIFIED N ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 16081.4 OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED CODE AS PER AIL REPORTS/0121.01-98R; /0329.01-00 AND 1051201-03 AS 24. 22 et- I I I I PO?ssm 12-99 STANDARD. 41\ . STEELV g • 2024.GACE CALV. LL 2.A STEEL Sf{EET METAL Auras Sr{4LL HAVE STRUCTURAL DUALITY ASTY A u�j STEEL • STEEL DFSGA4ITKML -65; GRADE 40 MATH C-60 GALVAAIt2FD 20 GAGE GAL I • _i N SHALL J.ALL ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS LL BE.ALUMINLIM ASSOCIATION 606J-T6 ALLOY* TEMPER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4.ALL SCREWS TO BE STNNLESS STEEL J04 OR J16 NW SERIES OR CORROSION RESISTANT CO4TED CARBON STEEL AS PER LW 50018 W/50 kg1 YIELD poor AND 90 kd TENSILE STRENGTH 5 �1'063` I 1.937' 1.06J'� {--1.06J'�_ Q BOLTS'Td BE ALI/M6NUM'ASSOCYIIXNf 2O24-T4 N10Y&Tura?.ASTM A-307 G4LWVY¢ED STEEL O4 NM J04 SERIES STAINLESS STEEL, MON 36 IYEWi MINIMUM YE PONE. 1 I k. .-- . 0 HALF PANEL 9 S ANCHORS TD WALL 5TMLL BE AS FOLLOWS: (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) SCALE:3/6-- ,• SCALE:J/e•- 1• "' (4)70 E05TTNC POURED cONCREtE • a /4-I TAAC06 ANgMDRS AS MANE.7"ACIURED BY LT.W. Pull nAT �2470' h 3 000'Max. 2.470' 1/4�0 CF LAP-GRIP AA J1 S(BMA STUD-CON).AS MANUFACTURED BY 7RU-FAST CORPORATION. � 214' - - 1/4'0 ZAMAC NNILIN ANCHORS AS MANUFACTURED BY POWER FASTENING NC - / /8 -W ANCHORS OR ELCO o r 115' �2.470' 74-• T' BY POWER PAS7ENNG$ NC AND ELCD 7E70ROFESP(ECpTAI"EYY ANCHORS AS MANUFACTURED F L200' ,,,,, ANCHORS AS ML4nrUFAC1URED BY LAW. t1LXLDEOL �n R 250' I - 1/4'I RED HEAD DYNABOLT SLEEVE 125* + �-.125' R.250" `R.125" + n I g p 11E............... .125" R.125" 1B8 o ry, MINIMUM EMBEDMEM,1Mp POURED CONCRETE OF TAPCON ANCHORS 6 1 J/4; 0 0 !L 125' h I I f \-R. • -o ■ ` °+ a125" IT�' to FDR ZAMAc NwCIN ANCHORS 6 f JIB}FOR ELCO PANELMNTE AAICHORS 6 1 J/4h ^ n �7 t-.t2s• /�Olp• n 1 I oo +.': ■' FOR RED HEAD DYNABOLT SLEEVE ANCHORS 6 1 1 AND FOR CF TAP-GRIPOi o7s" I -1 �; ANCHORS 6 1 1/4' NTO THE POURED CONCRETE NO EMBEDMENT INTO Pi 075' g • 125' -. a. + - T -h N h f--150' L ^ r: _1N ANCHORS SHotLL BE_ EMBEDDED TYP• Jn N I g g .:,.....c: g a �i • I -��! aosz' STUCCO-SHALL BOE PERM/T7ELI 1/ 20 SCREIVSYUSED SHALL METE 1/1•LONG MIM4U4 SHOULD STUCCO EXLsr AND 75• • g N N --LOTS' LOTS' I $ IN N Y w I--.200" 1'MINIMUM FM WALLS W M NO mow. b I JI J84--^- I..093" A3)IV GISE THAT PRECAST STONE PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS, OR PAVERS BE FOUND ON THE EXISTING WALL OR FLOOR ANCHORS SHALL BE LOACI t 2250`--{ FULL a 3.000`Mac BE AS NOTATED ON NOTES ENOUGH TO REACH THE RUIN STRUCTURE BEHAID SUCH FS4N£L$ ANCHORAGE SHALL 11----2.250"---I Fuel a 50 3" ANGLE BUILD • 2.591' O 3F8 TRACT(' (B)TO EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK Wi1LL z59r z.2so OUT BRACKET - - "I TUFACRI 1 4 TAP CON ANCHORS AS MAN RED BY LT.W. BtutDDL Z 591' " " SGILE: •-_l,_. - 1/4'I CF TAP-GR P ANCHORS STUD-CON),AS MANUFACTURED BY TRU-FAST CORR:TP.411OH O U HEADER S •- 1' 1/4'.ZAJAC NA/L/N ANCHORS AS MANUFACTURED BY POWER FASTEMNGG INC "h" HEADER - 1/4'I x 7/8'CALK-1N ANCHORS OR ELCO male Mt(amok 7WEL ATE`ANCHORS AS MANUFACTURED 3Q 3" Max. "U" BUILD•OUT '�`£:' •' 1' BY POWER FAS1DVNGS SIC AND ELCOlE�XINXW RESPECTIVELY. SCALE: -- ,- SCALE; -- ,- . e:0 - 1/4'I REF}.HEAD DYMBOLT SLEEVE ANCHORS AS MANUFACTURED BY LT.W. BULDEX. 190" + 1/4`I J04 SERIES• NOTES APCOAL ELo PANEZWTE AND CF TAP-GRID [TOP TRACK .188'- ' 3T4.' + 093` SS STUD RIVETED 7D B l)Lamm EMBEDMENT OFT ANCHORS INTO CONCRETE BLOCK UNIT (SELF COMPONEMS) 750'Maxi I In• . o . o b SHAl BE 1 1/4, 1 J/8'FOR ZAMAC AAll1N ANCHORS AND 1 1 CI ANGLE 0 SPACINGS /B"FOR RID HEAD DYTVABOLT SLEE4E ANCHORS I3. .570'Max ' AR h m ▪f@@' c,12 ' ^SHOWN ON SECTIONS 8s) 7/8'CALK-tV ANMHXJIRS STALL BE- CONCRETE ANCHORS (S1F SCHEDULE) '3- IOh �O �!• T- o M111 ^ STUCCO EMIREZY E]/BEtiC1ED WTO THE CONCRETE BLOGYO UNIT h1O E3(8EZ14EM/MD r LC I I 1 I ,� -r a _ �-• s r'MAVIMlM FDR WAALLS 4 SCREWS USED SHALL.BE 1 1/2'LONG MINIMUM SHOULD SIUCUO EXIST, AND a 100' • _ g .. • e e e ��090• •095' L795' 1 LEG LOG4176N 1 ~09J-TE � * ' SEE 1 C 06 L E 70 7H N IN CASE THAT PREcAsr AN E STRUCTURE E CONCRETE PANELS. Si BE AS WANCHORS SHALL ON I 090' I II c--- 1 1 DETAIL NOTES IN al)ANO�)ABOVE r^-1.950'�i R.125' 2.000'�•off I-z000'� M(C) ACT STALL BE INSTALLED FOLLOWING ALL OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECFICATIO6 OF THE ANCHORS ti �, ER ® 3/4" B. 0, ® REVERSED "F" ® "F" TRACK ANGLE • 0 -111.1111 Ir : 7. FWJEIS MAY ALSO BE NSTALLEO HORIZONTALLY FOLLOWING INSTALLATION DETAILS SHOWN ON SECTIONS 1 THRU 8 111111 "F" TRACK ANGLE TRACK :J/e' 1' (SHEET 2&J OF 8)EXCEPT THAT HEADERS Z 3& 4 SHALL NOT BE USED.. IIII1II1I1I1I " SCALE 3/6'- ,• SCALE 5 Nun.ALLY Q IT SHALL BE THE OF 7NE CONTRACTOR TO• SCALE:J/Z!'- 1' SCALE I VS.-.,• SHUTTER 6 TO BE ATT�N5U4E PROP ANC HCRAGGE THIS STALL ONLY BE ATTACHED TO THE SOUVONESS OF THE STRUCTURE W HERE SARI0.J44BLOCK OR WIOOD FRAM£outwi= „"""��'''' �� 9. THE IILSTALLATION CONTRACTOR 6 TO SFAI/CAULX ALL SHUTTER COMPONENT EDGES WHICH REMAIN IN CONTMVUDUS 0 Itg A M CONTACT WRH THE BUADIAC 70 PREVENT WIND/RNN NTIRUSONL CWUO•AND SEAL SHUTTER TRACKS ALL AROUND FULL 1111111111111111111111111111 �7 I OF>?• sS"STUD RIVETED �d 10•RSTORMEGULATIONS PANEL INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH SPECS INDICATED N THIS DRAWING PLUS ANY BUL GANG AND ZONING 0 Q w ! i I _if TO PLATE • M REGULATIONS PROVIDED BY THE JURISDICTION WHERE PERMIT 6 APPGm M. 1750' O 12'O.0 281 11. (a) THIS P.ED PREPARED BY THIS ENGINEER 6 GENERIC AND DOES NOT PROVIDE INFORMATION RJR A SITE SPECIFIC .666' + I PROJECT;Le. WHERE THE SITE CONDITIONS DEVIATE MOM 71E P.E.D. 625` w 27I 17 I ........ (D)OOVTRAC70R 7D BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE saECTIOK PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION INCLUDING LIFE SAFETY OF THS I -'--- .093' 2.18@' R1.82B' DOCLifHM CUN57k PRODUCT, BASED WLTgH INS btFE7Y SRF VIDED LHEZE DOES NOT CLWlR4C7LORSEVIAIE FROM THE RESPONfSfBJtITY COND/110NS DETAILED ON THIS „Amor /.625 LIST' 6z9' - -- - --- -- -- ---- ----- - CO KEY HOLE AT PANEL 1.375' 062" (c) THIS P.ED. WILL BE CONSIDERED INVALID F ALTERED BY ANY MEAN6 t = Min. .085" .47r' ;I 09` rn° �9 --.a63' :' (d)SITE SPECIFIC PROJECTS SHALL BE PREPARE)BY A FLORILLI REGISTERED ENGINEER OR ARCNllECT WIRJLW WILL • 09 BECOME ENE ENGINEER OF RECORD (EO.RJ FOR THE PROJECT AND WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER USE 1 � � I- 1 KEY HOLE WASHER 379 OF THE P.ED. O 1 •62" ENGINEER OF RECORD.ACTING AS A DELEGATED IJVGNEER 7D THE P.ED. ENGNEEI;, STALL SUBMIT TO THIS LATTER THE I J' I CONCRETE ANCHORS SEE SCHEDULE) 31 SCALE:4 Alum/4' ALLOY stir SPECIFIC IXLIW7NlS FOR RENEW ' 1 ( i- I STALE:a/4'- 1- ©•,SNAP•CAP . Len. @ $TU DED N ATE 6067-75 ALLOY (a) THIS P.ED. SHALL BEAR THE LATE AND ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF RECORD Max STORM( PANEL TYPICAL ELEVATION -BorroM 7Rul ` is ' ca6J=rc ALLOYY sc+lF:J/6-- 1' rxAr PRE�'ARED rrML E 5. COLIPl l75) m This Not �r � i�� = I F.B.C.(N.H.V.H.Z.) - 1/4'MM� 1/4 Max nl Far� mp P��mit6 24 GAGE GALI/AN/ZED STEEL STORM PANEL AS SHOWN l ` \ , \ / -\ r\ / 4/02 Valid ySCALE �, .1875' / 3/ASE 093'- �ARrES i L E C O N c. EASTERN METAL SUPPLY, INC DATE SECTION A-A c TROU &T TESTINGENGINEERING COMPANY RME77A BFACI� FL 33407 L72-055 4268 WEST ROADS DRIVE N.t S. NAK Mtn.St,Ste.217, A IR FL J3160 WALTER a1r DETAIL 1:STUD W/ DIE CAST ZINC -. Plum:(305)571-1530.Fax:(305)671-I531 DRAWING No • -0006719 ". acscrnAMcw a MY. ttaxaram J NICKEL PLATED WING NUT OCT 17 24a3 -A. MIL IR-Jr. P. E r cer elms+two 4h4Au - - I 1 DELftAYBUCH '.„ `. _ UEUTAY BFACN HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD j MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT �II�� 1JJ3 1U01 1UD1 Agent: James Downey & Keith Snider Project Name: S+D Architecture, Inc. Project Location: 138 North Swinton Avenue ITEM BEFORE THrE BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing sign on a contributing property, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of the south 1.5' of Lot 9 and 10, less the south 3', Block 59, Town of Delray. The property is designated historic as part of the Old School Square Historic District and is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The contributing historic dwelling contains offices (converted from a single family residence) which received site plan approval on March 10, 1993 from the Historic Preservation Board. The offices were formerly occupied by Stahl & Associates. There have been no recent Board or administrative actions pertaining to this property. S+D Architecture, Inc. has recently leased the property and is now before the Board for review of a free-standing sign. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes the installation of a free-standing, two-sided sign constructed of MDO (Medium Density Overlay). The rectangular sign face and posts will be painted white with red and black text. The sign displays the name of the establishment, the building's address, and a small sign for a future tenant. The text reads "s+d architecture, inc." in lower case letters. The proposed sign will replace the existing sign for Stahl & Associates, Inc. and the existing structural supports including sign posts will be utilized for the new sign. The previous sign was double-faced and the sign face measured 48" (4') wide by 84" (7') tall (including the posts). The sign is located approximately 9' south of the northeast corner Meeting Date:June 2,2004 Agenda Item: IV.E. 138 North Swinton Avenue OSSHAD Page 2 of the property and 5.5' from the east property line and is oriented perpendicularly to the existing building permitting viewing from both north and south bound traffic on North Swinton Avenue. The proposed free-standing sign face measures 47" (3'11") wide with a 57" (4'9") high sign body and 84" (7') overall height (with posts). The area of the sign body measures 18.6 sq. ft. The sign does not interfere with any of the existing landscaping or sight visibility. No lighting exists or is proposed at this time. \ 3 S ,°k ., .,, ' R �A'£"ATM e S ANAL I .sy.'�.F' The Board shall consider: SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(1)(b) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Free-standing signs" A free-standing sign is not affixed to any other structure. It may be either a pole sign or a monument sign. Neither the pole nor the base of the monument shall be considered in calculation of the area of the sign face. A free-standing sign may not have more than two faces. LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings"and states: The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7) however, as the sign is located within the 10'setback, the sign may not exceed seven feet (7), which is further discussed below. LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(d) addresses Signs "Allowed in Totally in Standard Setback"and states: When considered as a part of a site plan, or modification to a site plan, a sign may be located within the ten foot setback area provided that: (1) the sign height is not greater than 7'and (2) that the sign area is less than 20 sq. ft. LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(h) addresses "Sign Locations and Potential Hazards"and states: No sign shall be located in such a manner that it will become a hazard to automotive or pedestrian traffic nor shall any sign or lighting be placed as to obstruct the vision of the driver or any motor vehicle where vision is necessary for safety. 138 North Swinton Avenue } OSSHAD Page 3 LDR Section 4.6.7(H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (E), prohibited sign, with respect to height and area. Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building facade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the architecture. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts, however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining"and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. One such standard states: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, 138 North Swinton Avenue OSSHAD Page 4 and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The proposed signage is appropriate in relation to style, dimensions, and design of the one-story, contributing, frame building and the surrounding neighborhood; however, the sign's color scheme does not compliment the building. The color scheme of the sign or the building should therefore be altered to compliment one another and has been added as a condition of approval. Further, as the sign measures 84" (7') in total height and measures 18.6 sq. ft. in area, the sign meets the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(d). In addition, the previously approved sign location does not create a sight visibility concern and therefore complies with LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(h). Based upon the above, positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.6.7(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards can be made once the color scheme is addressed. REVIEW BY OTEERS`. .: � �7 ,� The Delray Beach Sign Review Committee reviewed and recommended approval the location, sign design and dimensions as proposed during its meeting on May 21, 2004. A:LT."ERN';ATIVE ;ACTIONS "" A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA request for 138 North Swinton Avenue, S+D Architecture, Inc., by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c) of the LDR's, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of the COA request for 138 North Swinton Avenue, S+D Architecture, Inc., based upon a finding that the request and approval thereof is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c) of the LDR's, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation with the basis stated. 138 North Swinton Avenue OSSHAD Page 5 RECOMMENDATI©NC .,.>2., ._ a .�... ...� �<S.> .s-4v..a. , t,_m. Move approval of the COA request for 138 North Swinton Avenue, S+D Architecture, Inc., by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7) of the LDR's, and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the color scheme of the sign or building is modified in order to compliment one another. Attachments:Survey, Sign Details Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner I ' �` ,``•C � ` r�` • y♦• �a.^^'.. • ,J c? "'span ;��rV a j •1 i -w..yB.6-- itli? y 4 a F'� \ 1 r• ;. k: ' , +. ,,. A- 5 _.'' 3 f • 4 l�-Sa + -*. R7� -�• of"-1 N .• .N /2 (� - <. `4r 15• F•.,"L '^ T.#s'�"` °- o ,�• \r.r 1k .—tf h i rL�i._M• • r:.� +.,1 ,,,- n d• 1F • �• `•,r•. `€� '`N'i \ .� -•�a�i_' ff \L `t'A+y ,'• 'i Sy �. cjtr F• t. rt F i 4' 1 I i ' �' t'�-1,Y-y. .' 'ix '"••��,•,r t�,t y�yj.•� 'a. ,N.-0".!Y•..1 F" ._1t' t 'f - )• r n�'a �! y •i t i Q y�•�T)af • - -. • .E •l r yy w D fix. 1" r' ' S.+y,�Ar�Y /q' l J a iF� a ,yr.�.,f _ t j."S � t r''t ,i' ''•a �n9' +�' ��` .� '� -•�a� i"� f y Y a. s',.. 'ice : • . ��• lr "7 • '• `►-- �" yM'c�•�.. t• 9 .•' .• - . �f�ta. .T, \ ". S R '46 �• ti : �ry1 r. .tIG"�� .- t. •- -- _ + v .1+a. ,. +�•rS ,t4 • f `Ll....•-i -? r . 4.� 1" i'u"d )f I sa4 \/' , r 4,3 c it , �` t 4V.4 1- • ` - .J{ � r y s tZ +- . . r �a::....� • lt+t 4.: tit t t":,7-44 ALtY r t, sr 1y 1 -fitj J ,, y- #• {x ia - 1 ,i! ' ; :•-,.-._. >.', .s�f��41'ia.. -1. %'�:e�f.�• tja:. 8 t '� �J . ,� if. \ )- E' 1T ''' ��f .! .J�: ?P,�Yettt J�j< .�,�r.•.r. .�v Qtp`a .7e�.`A '',1`_ •f •F �; of _ ,may'. '•,: r�ti -�.` •n,.st C lr j� rS.22, � .-F: ..-• d' y^.....4 f * �� ti -• ,, ��.`.ice' :ii y� -�.,•L.,►� ;1 ii7,; ..,et et r :.t.. of' P- �!p ;-? �_ f' ri• • /jam a,ii � := -_..- 3 �� .{•-:k.T ;:` :24 : ..�It'2K,• -tom ( 'As. .B F~�c . "' .. -�! • /•, ti , ` '{ y'. • i A.„. I. ''' 4. �- . J_• 4' ;r4.' F`_k a w• �'", •jti :-4'�'/'r,a,��t �. •• t,4< f ~-'yt` lat / a J y 1 the_i�/ i =i 1;� •, t '�'. �'r. h� . + T. tr�fY 5 k•` -�- 'fir,�iF 1 t .�� 'i _ a fy *' 3•e '.1,, y• / lit \�,'� .� -t s tt_ =S In f t a� r o. •• ,r`ta` A :t 7.3��`tl�`tyi i�/�, -. y/'j ,/',, ' 7; '�• : r i `/��.. �`,l- 4�lti" '1: �.iiIrs {.. {. eA r ' i+fJ' ,rie-{Y`q j -i/f s a • • • tom- tc s, ., -it / „,t 1°*2,,4�•��;v i r,. V 'S' j�tu a,1. } ��.4 1 1 i4 r slt,I r)r' i - t�A�7'4a ,,�.' t� "7� l• -t ,a,,41:, • { ( t , - i Ic 1 I3 a dtS ry �� .. fL t} IllZlOi = ,4'a - �I'f 1. ^` `.. t t t R1 FL - �i r .Fv ' Fq •J at y'� ; r; r. _.1 - ; 7 F3� ifs_ ) a� � at yD� a. Alt... ' 9t jF y t t (ix i� IEjl t ' P I 4Y/'� • ;4. � , * - r 'r.; a F , �r• Ir., 4, ,, �f /r + Y f s .- t) . U 4 ) . a 1 .e'�r�.; 2'PAI& r-,k, ...„, : 1 r1j K a j3 -.1,:-.t:•r ft j tIT47b d� s 1 'i�1 }7 ,- .� 3 Yd z t}.a } j ; x„`"mt 1 38 r{A i. ° 4 Fj f { j •y fRi f t • .,:.:.. i....it.71.4„;.....,* ,-,:y...,i,t..,,..,.sl,A r.:,.....4 _ __ .....___..:::., ..,"*„.,-,1 r,-_''-,-;-t.-.-; ;-1-., ---., -:-...„44.,.,_. '.,,-1::=-.: . .,,,,-L_ ;F.-:-. ..--J-Fe17,1.-.7.17:.;.: .,..,-. -=;....:'''.: ., strAnt„... . ..... ,.,,,,.....„,,,. ,,,,, . ....,,,,, ...., , S. L Lr iY 6 • _ , ASSO-CI Al ; S - _ :.� , s' r "»ems- � aC' r : gt u `•,� as p ....1. 1 _ q � ! t Per �•{'+ • .-2. • {_ - f aye slF:. i{-:,1 b ' y• r ty 4 ✓�' 3 �a r ry 3 , ?_I t 1. }i . , , c a *'441•'a, �� a..''.; ? `• C ar.i.a, 10 4 - t .., y ▪ 1\:.._. • ►, %1.r' :......_,..._'• .* .a,.,,• „-- y t '<•il �.. 1,1 s...r >.�„ t , ,R •."▪ .-r am1 s ,1 �''S ctG t s. ! ; rr"-w.-. .� ..✓� � u•- :yC V� ti5 i�Y:✓. .}l t-y`.4.b•} (. - J y.,.4�rt< '';.f T-•y-• u ,,4,� } ( r -, T T !'"" 1... .—� .Y-"-.,a. .fr.•�,, -• Y� a 1 r �• • ^.�3. .•tti.` I�•l f - •• +�..„ r':�'3•_ s M-d < • t C iPC'?a 4';'*. .t^ .`-,•✓ f" '4. i '7.,' , l - - e,.....S�� ".a 'M1ci '_ r :r • C-'h r# Wk.',,,,...+ Eic, -'- ��''''''`•'`c, i`c•`--''' 7 tf•�`t-c ns,• 'yy ''' ..- t `,•,.q ,� s,. ',-.••, T `-r :.---c . f '.. .a • a ?. F 3 • Za '9Qi. Y t .-t V*. '~,g7 .r.. -_k 1- _ air "�, '�i, .k.•,i,tT ram 1- _ a't �4rr • :• '`�� b`: S`�- Z:�L� • y I.(' .-t• ,,. SF. -r+ ��i A� '.1 '.. -- ._ X rslw • xi' �• . :� _ r ray. t`{t�>_ �cc' :�5tf "e._ ^' t t q ' p4_ . .,' .yp.,•� . c:t•!- -�., "\,! -' -\:. - -1-[ `t tea' ■ R ye A+ 1 '17 " I �s 1s`Yt ° IAy.• : i 'tax t X i ; y } 1 �� -ppy �+i - '�„ ;r' 'D:- "�' ` i�: �ls' ' �1'#ar�t � � ;L�fi•�� t� �`t.�7► Y r�, c4'.' }: tt''1ty. � a" , A �' ;` 7,�. 'j,� `. ay. �dt 1.' `�' +;r - k'S. ` .ra'.. ♦> ,s si• F' v +''._y,�sr`F: i t ': 1 �t �. r7.rY > <,.s4. --,1-At a., t;•• i t."'tom.. y.F ^+�� rt-ir 9 s,• ..q (d ,s a It ♦ 7 t .�,. -'S i rs. ,t-r 4 t ti v ','�Q� q^�•t�:. fy� i, ` #'( " 'I�.t �., 'd Fq , ' -, . . ---.,� '. `ems i-,,-�5 4 � 4• .1 1� 1 _ ! S +,,-2. ^y�i• 14.. \ '•.b r-T--7ii a" 4,>`�` 'itT •�,j'-t„ *i ' =- .. [:,�a, ,,.,��``, 1 +.1� ' ,di•, t.z-�f 11•a t y,.. tp 1.7 ,,F`R,`jirl �s.. r'i -••R [` R. . .... .-. "-�, s y t j 1- V a*A li7"' Z.` , 1!\_'G. -, 4 4,. A `t ,•>1; ¢ -- i... 'may ,' " ��'., • �� Ai cZ >V•.. J G.. "Ya' !a ti -i l.. `k -1Ca� `�.:1+.. ;IP, <: - i I•'� t i. -'C,s. t j t• I '4 ` �-�� t. t1 Syr{ •' 'j - �S'' • f , �t"' `c1 ## �� .fi Vic. $ :+ l /. < � ` .a 1 ti_ .;`=-'F 7 Py q` 'l•4 i- `}t7 F� ,,�� G�',fa'`, •y,, }i S_. 4�_ r 4, t I s..Id'1.1 ,�=:"7�g'i !��._'3.� l;i �_'j+ rS 7Nit1' a ‘^S� sTc-" •cia .' XISTING COLUMN 3'-11" f DETAIL - REPAINT WHITE 0 "1 3 _9 1// 1 -5 EW MEDIUM DENSITY \ \ _ OVERLAY SIGN BOARD COLOR - WHITE \ EW RED BACKGROUND — 2) NEW 1/8" BLACK EW 1/4 VINYL LINE - VINYL L,IN, BLACK `n EW 8.5" VINYL LETTERS FONT: HAEESTTENSCHWEILER COLOR: WHITE oo EW 1" VINYL STRIPE - \ BLACK architecture, in EW 3.H VINYL LETTERS FONT: HAETTENSCHWEILER COLOR BLACK AA26000590. 3'-6> • EW 1" VINYL LETTERS FONT: ARIAL FUTURE TENANT NAME COLOR: BLACK EW VINYL SARIFF LETTERS - BLACK \ _ EW VINYL SARIFF STREET ADDRESS NUMBERS - 13 �\ BLACK XISTING STEEL BOLT\ \ CONNECTORS EXISTING 4"X4" STEEL POST, RE-PAINT WHITE TWO SIDED SIGN XISTING GRADE oo OPPOSITE ELEVATION THE SAME LAYOUT XISTING FOUNDATION TO REMAIN TOTAL SIGN AREA: 19.58 SQ.FT. \ \ s+d architecture, Inc. 138 North Swinton Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida — Phone: (561) 330-9511 Fax: (561) 330-9513 PRflLECT NAME: S+D ARCHITECTURE OFFICE SIGN .CT NUMBER: 04000.09 SHEET NAME: SIGN ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER: DATE ISSUED: MAY 5, 2004 AUTHOR: KAS A 1 . 0 DRAWING SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" REVISION NUMBER: ....:.........: E N,W, END STREET LEGEND, h £ = CENTERLINE 0 CONC. = CONCRETE NORTH LINE OF LOT 9 W.M. = WATER METER 137.60' - x x = CHAIN LINK FENCE A B = WIRE FENCE CN 0\ e = WOOD FENCE ~ — — = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES*- '1.:"'-- ep `0 n• iLW�� ¢� V k2W� FLOOD ZONE, X a d> �vp3j pC,, >2 2. 2 \ —1 po ,-'o° f p pp A �� a `" 13160' " , � 33.0' DESCRIPTION s SOUTH LINE OF LOT THE NORTH 73.5 D LOT 9, BLOCK 59,FEET DELRAYOF BEACHLOT!0,ANACCORDINGTHESOUTH TO THE1.5 PLATFEET OF W �9 N- \ .� T SIGN THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 3 OF THE PUBLIC V'` RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. '0_ 12 U W J \ N ti 2 W 1 ti 3 OV BRICK WALK 10 j / 3 (c O ti "I \11 ti y v CERTIFIED TO OOD RAMP 39.8' , 2No / 4.4' CHMIDT T > O STEPS--0. V Q ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC, ' H FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK AND TRUST, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS I— oa :� BRICK DRIVE Z V MILO KAMSTRA AND AGNES KAMSTRA, HIS WIFE Y 10 4' CONC.—F—I/ Q O , in i N N Q {0 17.8' ro% COVERED J-i .' 14.1'„,i 1 STORY M;— 9 a , a BUILDING • ti \ z a MAP OF BOUNDARY SUR VE Y /ti >..12.2' ' / i"14.0' N138 W cA le• /;N 1 STORY�;' 13 2' a 24 4' i N (4 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE �- • ' BUILDING ; �,,,,,,,,,,,,,,a 39.8' AND MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA .. • BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 61617-6,FLORIDA• i ' CONC� A e I LJ ' 300' , A/C PAD Co ADMINISTRATIVE CODE,PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. I"' Y��}-GONG•,......,,,i i v J / `� \✓--A-/-C^PAD-^ Wk\p a 131,60 01 Y 33.0' _ O 'N F� ENC£ENDS `FENS ' 131.60 ¢ 1' U^ �'' 0.4'SOUTH ON LINE _`SOUTH LINE OF LOT!0-� 'ri k ~W PAUL D. ENGLE P9 W W NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE ANOSUR VEYOR S. MAPPER #5708 ViW 0� p N b 3 THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA O J ^,If) ) ')\ q g 2 LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. U2 _ 0 "--1 V I 9�� 2o� Li °° O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC, L 0 O LAND SURVEYORS ---I J CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION#LB353 r SURVEYOR AND MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, PAUL D. ENGLE 2601 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33483 (561) 276-4501 732-3279 FAX 276-2390 DATE OF SURVEY SCALE, OCTOBER 8, 2003 1' = 20' 0 COPYRIGHT 2000 O'BRIEN, SUITER&O'BRIEN, INC FIELD BOCK PAGE NO ORDER ND D.209 17 89-64d • f DELL O N RAY BEACH F 1 D All-America City ' IjjI! 1993 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting June 2, 2004 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION /\V&vul ( 5eo avdat ( 4.\11, Ct && U ,s(— (-Al 5 Do I N 1 Al — 11Pgmt, &e/ _ZS-42 � D7 �• 1, Ti`�- 623,,ALociFi Lk N . 5wo-c-hYx I 11volToo �� R_ , (ftz: RFOOKy I 1, • Y s DELLRAOYR BEACH F I D A All-America City ' Ii ' '! 1993 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting June 2, 2004 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION /-- lov,"/ 5 :E