HPB- 08-18-04 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
MEETING DATE: August 18, 2004
LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez Azua, Jeffrey Silberstein, John Miller, Jr., Rhonda
Sexton, Randee Schatz and Maura Dersh
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mary Lou Jamison
STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Robert Tefft, Brian Shutt, and Denise Valek
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:10 p.m. Upon roll call it was
determined that a quorum was present.
No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items.
Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures.
The Notary swore in individuals for testimony.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Schatz and passed 6 to 0 to approve the Minutes of July 21,
2004 as written.
III. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Saraga & Lipshy, 203 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Roger
Cope, Authorized Agent. Continued from August 4, 2004
Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and an associated
Class III Site Plan modification for the conversion of a single family home to office and
an associated variance and waiver request.
Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none.
Mr. Tefft presented the item to the Board and entered a copy of the project file and his
resume into record. The property is located at 203 NE 1st Avenue, and is zoned
OSSHAD (Old School Historic Arts District), and is considered a contributing property.
This property contains a 1,206 sq. ft. one-story, frame vernacular dwelling constructed
in 1937. The development proposal is to convert the dwelling to an office building, and
construct a seven (7) space parking lot at the rear of the property adjacent to the
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
August 18, 2004
alleyway, and one (1) handicapped space at the front of the property backing out to
onto NE 1st Avenue. The applicant has requested that a variance be granted to allow
for the construction of that space to back-out onto 1st Avenue as well as waivers to
allow the parking space within the front building setback, and an additional waiver to
allow elimination of the required 24' by 6' maneuvering area within the seven-space
parking lot at the rear. Pursuant to the Banker's Row Parking Plan the development
requires only four parking spaces to convert from the residential dwelling to an office
building. However, it would be possible to eliminate the proposed parking space at the
front of the property, relocate the handicapped parking space towards the rear and thus
eliminate two parking spaces and eliminate the third space at the southwest corner of
the parking lot area to provide a maneuvering area. This would eliminate the need for
both waivers and variance as well. There is adequate space and would still allow for 5
parking spaces which is in excess necessary for the conversion. Eliminating this space
in the front would allow the building to retain its residential character within the Banker's
Row neighborhood.
The creation of that parking space in the front is in conflict with the Banker's Row
Master Plan.
Regarding the landscape plan the cocoplum hedging at the alley access point must not
exceed 36" in order to meet the 20' site visibility triangle. The vertical landscape
elements are added along the front of the property upon elimination of the parking
space and removal of the paver blocks, as well as increasing foundation plantings and
ground cover.
There are no issues relative to design elements. The only note is that it may be
necessary to make modifications in order to meet the Florida Accessibility
Requirements upon relocation of the accessible parking space to the rear of the parking
lot.
Staff's recommendation is to deny the variance pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2) to
allow the back-out parking space at 203 NE 1st Avenue, as well as moving to deny both
the waiver requests to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3) to construct a parking space within the
front building setback, and to deny the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(4)(c) eliminating
the 24' x 6' maneuvering area.
As to the Site Plan and Landscape Plan, Staff recommends approval with certain
conditions as stated in the Staff Report.
Roger Cope, Cope Architects, 80, Northeast 4th Avenue, Delray Beach, advised the
single spot in front of the house off Banker's Row is existing, it is not an improvement.
The spot is extra wide and an improvement that was done in years past. The goal is to
find some way to have this client not have to move the space to the back of the
property, as it is a hardship to get a person from the back of the property into the
building and into the handicapped restroom that we made improvements to. It is a two
or two and a half foot elevation to gain access to the house, and it would mean an
architectural ramp on the back of this house. We worked to see if we could put a ramp
to the side of the house, however, this was not feasible. It is a convoluted exercise to
get a handicapped person into the house. My clients want to provide an adequate
number of parking spots. We are in agreement with the landscape conditions and are
2
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
August 18, 2004
making significant improvements to the alley itself. We are not making any architectural
changes to the building. In closing, the client is the owner of the property to the south
and that particular property has two structures: a house and a secondary house off the
alley. You can get a quick feel for what an encumbrance a handicapped ramp is on that
house.
Chairman Perez asked if there were any comments from the public. There were none.
Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from
the staff.
Ms. Shay asked Mr. Cope if he and his client were aware that the Banker's Row Master
Plan states upon conversion from residential to commercial that the front parking space
needs to be eliminated,
Mr. Cope advised that was pointed out to him.
Ms. Schatz requested to see the portion of the Master Plan that refers to elimination of
the front parking space upon conversion.
As a copy of the plan was not on hand, Mr. Shay left the meeting temporarily. Upon
returning Ms. Shay read the subject portion of the Plan and circulated the Plan for the
Board to review.
Chairman Perez inquired about the difference in height.
Mr. Cope advised there is a wooden deck in the back southeast corner of the plan that
is three steps above finished grade, and then there is a step from the deck up into the
back room. The back room was an old Florida room (as depicted on the plan) and that
floor is lower by 6" or 8" from the main body of the house. You have to get up to the
deck you then have to get from the deck inside the back of the house then you have
from the back of the house up to the main floor of the house. It is interior and exterior
ramping.
Mr. Silberstein mentioned that the existing driveway is 10' wide.
Mr. Cope advised there was a walkway adjacent to the driveway and they are now one.
Mr. Cope asked the Board to look over the floor plans in regard to the walkway,
driveway and back of the house.
Board discussion ensued relative to the walkway, driveway, and back of the house.
Mr. Silberstein advised the handicapped parking space would have to be stripped.
Ms. Shay advised that Chapter 34 of the Building Code states that 20% of the
improvement costs of the building are going to be incurred making the building
accessible, and then there is an opportunity for a waiver at the State level.
3
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
August 18, 2004
Mr. Cope inquired if we could speak with Tallahassee regarding that option, and would
this Board be willing to consider that, and if it was feasible to have a handicapped
parallel parking spot off Banker's Row. Because the front of this property has two or
three spots.
Ms. Shay advised that 215 NE 1st Avenue was trying to utilize the existing parallel
spaces. The issue is there were handicapped parking spaces across the street that
were provided, and supposedly for conversion of the houses along Banker's Row.
However, since the handicapped codes have changed and the accessibility codes do
not allow you to park across the street. Mr. Scott Aronson, our Parking Management
Specialist will be going Tallahassee with a request to designate a certain number of
spaces in those parallel spaces as handicapped specifically for conversion.
Unfortunately, the request will not go until November, and he has to go to the DCA
before this can be implemented. Mr. Aronson is getting information from Engineering so
he can move forward with the DCA to find out if they can establish these spaces as
handicapped. Based on the fact that this was an assessment of the property owners
they can't just move forward with certain spaces be for the handicapped and not
allowing the public to utilize the spaces.
Mr. Silberstein advised that parallel spaces are allowed, however they have to be
twelve feet (12') wide.
Ms. Shay advised these spaces were in the public right-of-way and the property owners
paid for those spaces to be public spaces. If the spaces need to be modified to be 22'
long we would move forward with doing that. Until we know DCA will allow that, we
cannot move forward with that. We are waiting for the decision.
Chairman Perez asked the Board how they felt about the maneuvering area and the
reduction of additional spaces in the back.
Mr. Tefft described to the Board a means by which the required maneuvering area and
required parking spaces could be accommodated on site. Mr. Cope indicated a
concern as to the number of compact spaces staff's suggestion would necessitate. The
Board further discussed the maneuvering area.
Mr. Tefft advised relative to the maneuvering area, with respect to this space, you are
required to have a 24' wide by 6' deep area. The space depicted on the map does not
have this. The request is to eliminate one space and then you would have the adequate
maneuvering area.
Mr. Tefft advised that the waiver request could be modified to permit a 24' x 5'
maneuvering area.
Chairman Perez asked Mr. Cope if he was in agreement with the technical items
relative to the site plan and the other technical items in the staff report. Mr. Cope
advised he was in agreement with them.
Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing.
4
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
August 18, 2004
Variance
It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Mr. Miller, and passed 6 to 0 to move to
deny the request for a variance from LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2), to allow a backout
parking space at 203 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga & Lipshy Office by adopting the findings
of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent
with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in LDR Section
4.5.1(J).
Waivers
Parking in Front Yard
It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and approved 6 to 0 to move
to deny the request for the waiver to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), to construct a parking
space within the front building setback at 203 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga & Lipshy Office,
by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the
request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set
forth in LDR Section 2.4.7(6)(5).
Maneuvering Area
It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and approved 6 to 0 to move
approval of the request for the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(4)(c), to permit a 24' x 5'
maneuvering area for the southwest parking space at 203 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga &
Lipshy Office, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and
finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet
the criteria set forth in LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5).
Chairman Perez asked Mr. Cope if he was in agreement with the motion.
Mr. Roger Cope advised he was in agreement with the above motion.
Site Plan Modification
It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and approved 6 to 0 to move to
approve the request for Class Ill site plan approval for 203 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga &
Lipshy Office, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and
finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(F)(5), 4.4.24(F)(2), 4.5.1(E)(4) and
(E)(8)(a-k), and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations, subject to the
following conditions:
1) Address all Site Plan Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the revised
plans;
2) That the 24' x 5' maneuvering area is provided in the parking lot;
3) That the handicapped accessible parking space is relocated to the rear (east) of
the building and the parking space in the front yard is eliminated; and,
5
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
August 18, 2004
4) That accessibility modifications are noted on the site plan and elevations, where
applicable; and
Motion amended by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and approved 6 to 0 to move
approval of the site plan modification to include the following:
5) That the pedestrian pathway between the front door and sidewalk be restored as
indicated on the survey.
Landscape Plan
It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and approved 6 to 0 to move
approval of the request for the Landscape Plan approval for 203 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga
& Lipshy Office, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report,
and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets
criteria set forth in Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations, subject to the
following condition:
1) Address all Landscape Plan Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the
revised plans.
Motion amended by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and approved 6 to 0 to
move approval of the landscape plan to include the following:
2) That the vertical elements at the front of the house are symmetrical to the front
walkway.
IV. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPORIATENESS
A. Willis Residence, 160 Marine Way, Marina Historic District, Francisco Perez, Authorized
Agent.
Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the enclosure of a loggia on a single-
family home.
Chairman Perez stepped down.
Mr. Tefft presented the items to the Board and entered a copy of the project file into the
record. The property consists of Lot 14, Block 126, and is located on the west side of
Marine Way. The property is zoned Medium Density Residential and includes a 2,510
sq. ft. contributing dwelling constructed in 1940 (including a 1,795 sq. ft. second story
addition constructed in 1955 which utilized the existing guest cottage). The dwelling is
considered contributing within the Marina Historic District.
The applicant is now before the Board for the enclosure of the existing 186 sq. ft. loggia
on the contemporary portion of the dwelling. The applicant is proposing the enclosure
of the 188 sq. ft. loggia located on the first floor of the dwelling between the living area
and the previous guest cottage (presently a garage). The enclosure consists of the
installation of two paired divided light French doors with stucco relief arches above.
6
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
August 18, 2004
Decorative wood knee braces support proposed wood trellises that extend three (3) feet
beyond the footprint of the building into the side setbacks. Existing wood supports are
to be removed.
Staff is recommending approval subject to the condition that an updated survey
depicting existing site conditions is provided prior to issuance of building permit.
Francisco Perez, Architect, for the project, inquired if the present survey could be used
as it was done after the construction.
Ms. Shay advised that Mr. Phil Etchison, Chief Building Inspector, is requiring a current
survey as the property is under different ownership.
Mr. Perez inquired If the motion could read "to provide the survey if required by staff
and the Building Department".
Ms. Shay advised they could contact the Building Department. However, as this is a
very old survey and it does not show all the improvements that were done some time
ago. I have spoken to the Building Department on several occasions and they are
requiring an updated survey.
Ms. Schatz advised the cost of a new survey is approximately $250.00.
Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if there was any one from the public who wished to
address the Board. There were none.
Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if the Board had any comments. There were none.
It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 5 to 0 to move
approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the enclosure of the 188 sq. ft. loggia
at 160 Marine Way, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report,
and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets
criteria set forth in Sections 4.3.4(H)(4)(I), and 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(g) of the
LDRs and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the
following condition:
1) That an updated survey depicting the existing site conditions is provided, prior to
issuance of a building permit if so deemed necessary by the Building Department,
City of Delray Beach.
Chairman Perez returned to the Board.
V. DISCUSSION ITEMS AND ACTION ITEMS
A. Northwest Swinton Avenue Historic District Designation.
Item Before the Board: Review the Designation for the Northwest Swinton Avenue
Historic District and set a date for the Public Hearing.
7
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
August 18, 2004
Mr. Tefft advised that staff is requesting that a public hearing date be set for September
15, 2004.
Ms. Shay added one additional style on Northwest Swinton Avenue, which is
Contemporary or Mid-Century Modern. We are not going to include ranch style houses.
Frank Hunter - thanked the Board and the chair for giving us this opportunity, He
advised he has lived in this designated area for 15 years. He advised he was on the
Historical Preservation Board in Tampa for two years. I am somewhat confused,
apparently there is a Designation Report, and however, the final report will not be
completed till the date of the hearing.
Ms. Shay advised the updated report will be available by Friday, August 27, and will be
available for the Homeowner Association meetings on September 1 and September 13.
Mr. Hunter advised he was not aware of the process in order to move forward. He did
not understand why the entire Lake Ida and Dell Park area were not going to be
included in the historic designation, as there were quite a few historical homes in these
areas. He also advised this was moving too fast, as the Board changes membership
September 1, Ms. Shay is leaving in a few weeks, and information has not been sent to
the public, and some people have been out of town. He suggested that the hearing be
set back as two and a half weeks is not enough time.
Ms. Shay advised we started looking at this back in May on a staff level. We are
following the same procedure that was done with other historic districts. We sent flyers
out to every property owner that was affected by this so they could attend the meeting
on August 9. If they were not able to attend this meeting, there were two options; they
could attend the Lake Ida Park HOA meeting on September 1, by that time the
designation report would be available with corrections. Secondly, we would set-up the
other HOA meeting on September 13, for those who did not attend the September 1
meeting. This would then go to the Historic Preservation Board Meeting on September
15 with staff in attendance.
Mr. Hunter advised that staff has been working on this since May and you are going to
give the public only a few weeks to study the information, and then the public hearing is
set. I feel the process is moving too fast for the neighborhood. There are about 175
addresses in this area. I personally would like to have more time to research it.
Mr. Scott Christensen, President, Seacrest Neighborhood Association, advised he was
one of the individuals who wrote the Seacrest Del-Ida Plan in 1997. In 1998 it was
approved, and part of that was consideration of the historic district in the Seacrest
neighborhood. We had meetings following that at which time we discussed with
Wendy's predecessor, or predecessors. The discussion at that time with our
neighborhood association was that they would do a historic assessment of the
neighborhood. Upon completion of the assessment they would come back to us and
then we would discuss the pros and cons of historic neighborhoods. I talked to Ms.
Shay before I left on vacation and I asked and recommended to her and Mr. Costello
that they hold off on this whole process because we had a considerable number of
people in our neighborhood that are not here in the summer. Our neighborhood
association takes the entire summer off on and we still work in September. When they
8
,
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
August 18, 2004
had the public hearing, I wasn't there, I was on vacation. I have had considerable input
from the people in the neighborhood who have come over and talked, and called. It has
created more questions than answers that we go at the initial meeting. The importance
of this is this for the neighborhood association to understand what a historical district is.
There are certain perceptions out there, some of which are true and some are not. They
have to have a very strong understanding of this. Our first meeting is September 13.
I'm sure that meeting is going to generate more questions than answers also. It is not
the time to take this to discussion at the Historic Preservation Board level for our
neighborhood until this has gone through a couple of discussions at the neighborhood
level. These people are going to be directly affected by this and there seems to be
significant differences of opinion of what are the pros and cons for this. Another thing
that I do not understand is, what are the requirements from the neighborhood as far as
them as a group indicating whether they want to have the historical designation or not?
Is there a vote in the neighborhood.
Ms. Shay advised they have an opportunity for public comment at both the Historic
Preservation level and City Commission level.
Mr. Hunter inquired as to who chose the boundaries.
Mr. Perez advised that was where the concentration of historic buildings is.
Ms. Shay advised updated information would be available on August 27, 2004.
After Board discussion due to the fact that we will have two new Board members, and
revised information needs to be sent out it was decided that the meeting would be reset
to October 6, 2004.
It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Mr. Miller, and approved 6 to 0 to set the
Public Hearing date for October 6, 2004.
B. Dell Park Historic District Designation.
Item Before the Board: Review the Designation Report for the Dell Park Historic District
and set a date for the Public Hearing.
Ms. Shay advised for the Dell Park Historic District, homes built up to 1950 would be
included.
Mr. Frank Hunter, Lake Ida/Northwest Swinton Avenue, Delray Beach, advised that
there was confusion relative to the Designation Report. He also advised that a lot of
people were not aware of this issue.
Mr. Scott Christensen, President of the Seacrest Neighborhood Association, advised
that it was important for the Association to have a strong understanding of what the
Historic Designation means. He also advised that these people would be directly
affected by this designation.
Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing.
9
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
August 18, 2004
Chairman Perez asked if the Board had any comments.
Ms. Shay advised that in May we started the process relative to the homes that were
contributing and non-contributing, we moved forward in June and July.
Ms. Schatz mentioned that we had two new Board members and it would be beneficial
is we had another month to review this issue.
It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and approved 6 to 0 to set
the Public Hearing date for October 6, 2004.
VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Public Comments. None
B. Reports from Historic District Representatives. None
C. Board Members. None
D. Staff
Ms. Shay advised that Robert Tefft would be taking over her position until the position
was filled permanently. She will be relocating to Kansas City, MO.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
The Board made a motion to adjourn at 8:00 p.m.
The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for August 18,
2004, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on November 17, 2004.
(0?"7:71/=2-e‘ (/-2 -7-24/
// j
a
Denise A. Valek
If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this
means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and
approval, which may involve some changes.
10
AGENDA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING
0
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
4'4;
Meeting Date: August 18, 2004
Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting
Location: First Floor Conference Room
Time: 6:00 P.M.
The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a
disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity
conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD),24 hours prior
to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening
devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any
matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for
this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such
record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide
or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• July 21, 2004
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Saraga & Lipshy, 203 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District,
Roger Cope,Authorized Agent. -Continued from August 4, 2004.
Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and an associated Class Ill Site Plan
Modification for the conversion of a single family home to office and an
associated variance and waiver request.
IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS
A. Willis Residence, 160 Marine Way, Marina Historic District, Francisco Perez,
Authorized Agent.
Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the enclosure of a loggia on a
single family home.
V. DISCUSSION &ACTION ITEMS
A. Northwest Swinton Avenue (Lake Ida Park) Historic District Designation.
Set a Public Hearing date for September 15, 2004 for consideration of a
proposed historic district designation.
B. Dell Park Historic District Designation.
Set a Public Hearing date for September 15, 2004 for consideration of a
proposed historic district designation.
• August 18,2004 HPB Meeting
' Page 2
VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Public Comments
B. Reports from Historic District Representatives
C. Board Members
D. Staff
VII. ADJOURN
Wendy Shay, toric Prese ation Planner
POSTED ON: August 13, 2004
MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
MEETING DATE: July 21, 2004
LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Mary Lou Jamison, Rhonda Sexton,
Jeffrey Silberstein, John Miller, and Maura Dersh
MEMBERS ABSENT: Randee Schatz
STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Denise Valek, and Terrill Pyburn
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:02 p.m. Upon roll call it was
determined that a quorum was present.
No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items.
Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures.
Ms. Valek swore in individuals for testimony.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Echols Residence, 1181/2 SE 7th Avenue, Marina District, Adriana Finnvold,
Authorized Agent.
Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for a 605 sq. ft.
addition on a contributing garage and cottage and associated variance.
Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were
none.
Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board and entered a copy of the project file and
her resume into the record.
Ms. Adriana Finnvold, Authorized Agent, presented a new rendering of the proposal.
The applicant supported staff's presentation and conditions of approval.
Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address
the Board.
Alieda Riley, 65 Palm Square, Delray Beach, supported the project and commended
the applicant for retaining the historic buildings.
Historic Preservation Board Meeting
July 21,2004
k
Dan and Donnamarie Sloan (who reside to the north of the property involved with the
request) submitted an e-mail, as stated by Ms. Shay, in support of the project.
Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments
from the Board.
Ms. Dersh inquired if the setback of five (5) feet would pertain only to this property.
Ms. Shay advised it would only pertain to this project not with the west property line
for future modifications.
Demolition
It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Miller and passed 6 to 0 to move
approval of the COA request for demolition of the 293 sq. ft. portion of the
contributing cottage at 118% SE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and
law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in LDR Sections 4.5.1(F).
Variance
It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 6 to 0 to move
approval of the request for a variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the rear
building setback from 10' to 5' for an existing addition to a contributing structure and
dwelling located at 118'/z SE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law
contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in LDR Sections 2.4.7(A) and
4.5.1(J), subject to the following condition:
1) That the variance to reduce the rear setback pertains only to the extant 226 sq.
ft. accessory structure at the northwest corner of the property.
Certificate of Appropriateness
It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Miller, and passed 6 to 0 to move
approval of the COA request for 118'/z SE 7th Avenue by adopting the findings of
fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in LDR Sections
4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following
conditions:
1) That the variance to reduce the rear setback pertains only to the extant 226 sq.
ft. accessory structure at the northwest corner of the property;
2) That repairs/replacement made to the extant portions of the single family
dwelling are made with in-kind materials; and,
3) That the color scheme for the building is as follows: "Sage" for the body of the
building, "Hirsch Red"for the trim, and white for the accents.
2
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
July 21,2004
I
III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS
A. Anderson/Buckley Residence, 14 NE 5th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District,
Customline Remodelers, Authorized Agent.
Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation
of removable storm panels on a non-contributing residence at 14 NE 5th Street,
pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none.
Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board and entered a copy of the project file into
the record.
The applicant was not present.
Chairman Perez inquired if there were any comments from the public. There were
none.
Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments
from the Board. There were none.
It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Jamison, and passed 6 to 0 to
move approval of the COA request for 14 NE 5th Street by adopting the findings of
fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval
thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in
Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the LDRs and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject
to the following condition:
1. That the tracks or channels are painted to match the exterior of the building.
IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Public Comments—none
B. Report from Historic District Representatives- none
C. Board Members
Ms. Jamison mentioned that the home at 118 NE 5th Street had an eight (8) foot
fence on their property, and asked Ms. Shay if they came into Planning & Zoning
for approval of installation of French doors. Ms. Shay advised she would research
the issue.
D. Staff
A public informational meeting is set for August 9, 2004 at 6:00 p.m. in the City
Commission Chambers regarding the proposed Dell Park & NW Swinton Avenue
Historic Districts. The Lake Ida Park Home Owner's Association (HOA) meeting is
scheduled for September 1, 2004 and the Dell Park HOA meeting is scheduled for
3
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
July 21,2004
September 13, 2004. Staff will request that the Board set a public hearing date for
September 15, 2004.
V. ADJOURNMENT
The Board made a motion to adjourn at 6:35 p.m.
The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for July 21,
2004, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on August 18, 2004.
Denise A. Valek
If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this
means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and
approval, which may involve some changes.
8/12/04
4
Historic Preservation Board Minutes
July 21,2004
r+
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
.CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT---
MEETING DATE: August 18, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: III.A.
ITEM: Saraga & Lipshy Office, 203 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District—
Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class Ill Site Plan
Modification, Landscape Plan, and associated waivers and variance for the
conversion of a one-story contributing building to office.
POST — —
CASON OFFICE _
ws
METHODIST
CHURCH mg
_— C
in
a r—
II
GENERAL DATA: N.W.3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. �II I
LIJ
Owner/Applicant Robert Saraga & Brian Lipshy D -
Agent ... Roger Cope Z
Location NE 1st Avenue between NE W
2Nd Street and NE 3`d Street. Q I
operty Size 0.16 Acres _ I
ture Land Use Map OMU (Other Mixed Use) N.W.2ND ST. N.E. 2ND ST.
rrent Zoning OSSHAD (Old School z 3 I
Square Historic Arts District)
Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD (Old School _ Z - - 1
Square Historic Arts District) - I i
East: OSSHAD (Old School 1n
Square Historic Arts District) I '
N.W.1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST.
South: OSSHAD (Old School -
Square Historic Arts District)
West: OSSHAD (Old School r
Square Historic Arts District) W W Q
Existing Land Use Single Family Residence OLD
Proposed Land Use Covert existing residence Hill SQUARESCHOOL 1
to office with the ATLANTIC AVENUE
addition of a parking lot.
Water Service Existing on site. a I'
Sewer Service Existing on site. — I
— o a
Z ..•••
■
S.W.1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST.
I
s=
• -3 w
N vi v
,- VILE :
■
i _ U
III.A.
ITEM ;BEFORE=':T H�E BOARD
The action before the Board is that of approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness which
incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Saraga & Lipshy
Office, 203 NE 1st Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c):
❑ Class III Site Plan Modification;
❑ Landscape Plan;
❑ Waiver Request; and,
❑ Variance Request.
The subject property is located on the east side of NE 1st Avenue (Banker's Row),
between NE 2nd Street and NE 3rd Street.
BACKGROUND '
The subject property is the south 5.5' of Lot 10 and 11, Block 74, Town of Delray. The
property is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) and is considered
a contributing property in the Old School Square Historic District. The property contains
a 1,206 sq. ft., one-story, frame vernacular dwelling constructed in 1937.
There are no other recent administrative or Board actions taken with respect to this
property.
The project was slated for Board review on August 4, 2004, however, the applicant
requested that the item be postponed to the following meeting on August 18, 2004. The
applicant is now before the Board for consideration of a Class III site plan modification
for the conversion of a single family home to office.
P.RO„JECT DESC;RIP'TIO`N
The development proposal involves the following:
❑ Demolition of a 60 sq. ft. pre-fabricated shed;
❑ Conversion of the 1,206 sq. ft. dwelling to office;
❑ Construction of eight (8) parking spaces [seven (7) spaces to the rear (east) of the
building and one (1) handicapped accessible space in front (west of) the building];
❑ Variance from LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2) for the construction of a back-out parking
space onto NE 1st Avenue within the front building setback; and,
❑ Waiver request from LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), to allow a parking space within the
front building setback within the OSSHAD zoning district.
HPB Staff Report
203 NE 1st Avenue—Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan
Page 2
SITE PLAN MODIFICATION ANALYSIS
COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS:
Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be
addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development
application/request.
LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix:
The applicable development standards for the OSSHAD zoning district that relates to
the proposal are as follows:
Required Provided
Building Height(max.) 35' 13'
Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 25' 29.98'
Side (Interior) 7.5' 5.51**
-north
-south 7.5' 9.88'
Rear 10' 61.5
Open Space 25% 38.1%
**Existing non-conforming conditions: as no changes are proposed to the footprint of the
building, a variance is not necessary for the interior side setback of 5.5'.
LDR Chapter 4.4.13(G)(1)(Parking):
Parking
Parking for this proposal is being assessed as it relates to the conversion of the single
family home to office. The existing 1,206 sq. ft. building was previously utilized as a
dwelling. The applicant proposes to convert the dwelling to office use. Pursuant to LDR
4.4.24(G)(4)(a) all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide
one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to
non-residential use. However, pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(1), parcels along NE
1st Avenue between NE 2nd Street and NE 3rd Street (Banker's Row) shall comply with
either the provisions of Article 4.6 of these Supplemental District Regulation, or
provisions of the Banker's Row Development Plan, whichever is more permissive. The
approved Master Plan which was developed in 1991 stipulated that the required parking
for conversion of all properties within Banker's Row be based upon each property's lot
configuration and location of the extant historic building. Therefore, the parking
assessment for each property along Banker's Row varies by number and on-site
location.
Eight (8) parking spaces are proposed, including seven spaces to the rear (east) of the
building with access taken from the alley and one (1) handicapped accessible space in
front (west) of the building. The existing pre-fabricated shed will be removed in order to
HPB Staff Report
203 NE 15t Avenue—Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan
Page 3
accommodate the parking. As the Banker's Row parking plan requires just four (4)
spaces for this building's conversion to commercial use, the proposed spaces on-site
meet the necessary parking requirement for the site and its proposed use.
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(4)(c), dead-end parking bays shall be designed so
that there is a 24' wide by 6' deep maneuvering area at the end of the bay. This
maneuvering area shall not encroach upon landscape areas. The parking lot design
provides four perpendicular spaces and three back-out spaces (facing west). The
design does not accommodate the required maneuvering area for the northwest parking
spaces (facing south). As discussed above, the rear parking area must be re-designed
to accommodate the handicapped accessible space as well as the maneuvering area.
The applicant has requested waivers to allow the handicapped accessible space to be
permitted within the front building setback and to permit the elimination of the required
24' x 6' maneuvering area for the northwest parking spaces within the proposed parking
area and a variance to allow back-out parking onto NE 1st Avenue. The following is an
analysis of the requests:
Front Yard Parking
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), all parking, except for single family homes and
duplexes, shall be located in the side or rear yard or adjacent to a rear alley. No such
parking shall be located in the area between any street and the closest building or
structure. Where there are existing buildings or structures, the Historic Preservation
Board may waive this requirement during the site plan review process, provided that it is
determined that compliance is not feasible and that the character of the area will be
maintained. If approved, such parking shall be substantially screened from off-premises
view by a hedge or decorative fencing.
Maneuvering Area
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(4)(c), dead-end Parking Bays are discouraged, but
when site conditions dictate that there be dead-end parking bays, they shall be
designed so that there is a 24'wide by 6'deep maneuvering area at the end of the bay.
This maneuvering area shall not encroach upon required landscape areas.
Required Findings:
Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body
shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver:
(a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area;
(b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities;
(c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or,
(d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver
would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another
applicant or owner.
HPB Staff Report
203 NE 15t Avenue—Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan
Page 4
Recent approvals to permit parking within the front yard in front of the building, such
as a Class V site plan associated with 314 NE 1st Avenue as well as the Class V site
plan associated with 123 South Swinton Avenue, were previously supported in order
to meet the required parking on-site and due to site constraints affiliated with the
location of the extant historic buildings. As adequate parking will be provided to the
rear of the building with this proposal and since there is adequate space to
accommodate the handicapped accessible parking space to the rear of the building,
it is unnecessary for the handicapped accessible space to be located within the front
building setback.
In order to provide the 24' x 6' maneuvering area the southwest parking space could
be eliminated as the space provides excess parking per the required parking to
accommodate the conversion and is therefore unnecessary. As there are no site
constraints or life/safety issues which would interfere with the provision of the
maneuvering area, the parking space should be eliminated and the maneuvering
area provided for each parking space.
Support for the waivers would be considered a special privilege to the applicant as
compliance with 4.4.24(G)(3) is feasible and provision of the space in the front yard
would negatively impact the residential character of the area. The creation of a
parking space in front of the building is in conflict with the Banker's Row Master Plan
which notes elimination of the parking within the front yard. Construction of a back-
out parking space could create an unsafe situation due to possible site visibility
issues related to existing on-street parking within the right-of-way. Further, there are
no site constraints which limit the provision of a 24' x 6' maneuvering area or parking
requirements which restrict the elimination of the southwest parking space at the
rear of the building. Therefore, the waivers should not be supported based on the
criteria listed above.
Back-out Parking Variance
Per LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2), each required parking space shall be accessible at all
times. Access which conforms with minimal aisle standards and which includes
maneuvering area so that a vehicle must be able to enter and exit the parking area onto
a street or alley in a forward manner shall be provided. This requirement did not apply to
the previous single family residential use.
Required Findings:
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(J), in addition to the required findings of LDR
Section 2.4.7(A)(5) (copy attached), the Board may also be guided by the
following as an alternative to the above criteria:
(1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property
through demonstrating that:
(a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare;
(b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting,
location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenances, sign, or
HPB Staff Report
203 NE 1st Avenue—Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan
Page 5
building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures,
appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not
been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local
Register of Historic Places;
(c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the
historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the
historic character, of the historic district or historic site; and,
(d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic
character of a historic site or a historic district.
(2) Or, as an alternative to Sub-Section (J)(1), that a variance is necessary to
accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of a structure within a Historic
District or upon a Historic Site through demonstrating that:
(a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare;
(b) The variance would not significantly diminish the historic character of the
Historic District or Site; and,
(c) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to effect the adaptive
reuse of an existing structure or site.
(3) The Board shall otherwise follow procedures and impose conditions as required
of the Board of Adjustments.
The proposed variance would permit a back-out parking space onto NE 1st Avenue.
As with the waiver analysis, adequate parking has been provided on-site with this
proposal and since there is adequate space to relocate the parking space to the rear
of the building, it is unnecessary for the handicapped accessible space to be located
within the front building setback. Despite minimal site area, it is feasible to install a
conventional parking lot and to provide the handicapped accessible space to the
rear of the building. Further, construction of parking space in front of the building
would diminish the residential character of the neighborhood. Thus, granting the
variance should not be supported based on the fact that adequate space exists for
the construction of all the required parking to the rear of the building. Further, back-
out parking in front of the historic building would be contrary to the safety or general
welfare of the public due to possible site visibility issues related to the on-street
parking within the right-of-way. Both vehicular and pedestrian safety could be
compromised. Based upon the above, the requested variance does not meet the
intent of LDR Section 4.5.1(J) and should therefore be denied.
LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations:
Maneuvering Area
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(4)(c), dead-end Parking Bays are discouraged, but
when site conditions dictate that there be dead-end parking bays, they shall be
designed so that there is a 24' wide by 6'deep maneuvering area at the end of the bay.
This maneuvering area shall not encroach upon required landscape areas. As stated in
the parking analysis, adequate maneuvering area has not been provided. In order to
HPB Staff Report
• 203 NE 1st Avenue—Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan
Page 6
meet this requirement, a maneuvering area measuring 24' wide by 6' deep must be
provided or the waiver request approved. (see additional analysis above).
Drive Aisle Width
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(b), the point of access to a street or alley shall not
be less than 24' for a normal two-way private street or parking lot driveway aisle. The
applicant is proposing the construction of a 26' wide drive aisle, while also providing a
five foot (5') wide landscape strip along the north and south property lines adjacent to
the parking area. Therefore, the proposal meets the drive aisle width requirement.
Site Lighting
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.8, site lighting is required for new development proposals.
Site lighting has been provided through the use of two decorative pole lights, with acorn
fixtures, adjacent to the parking area. The proposed fixtures are 13' in height and
appropriate to the style of the building. Therefore, the proposal meets the intent of this
section.
Refuse Container Area
The proposal includes the installation of a 5' x 5' refuse container area on the north side
of the property adjacent to the building to accommodate roll out containers. Proposed
and existing landscaping will screen the containers from the NE 1st Avenue right-of-way.
Therefore, the proposal meets the requirements.
Site Plan Technical Items:
The following technical items must be addressed prior to issuance of a building
permit.
1) Provide drainage calculations.
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Existing and proposed landscaping is incorporated into the landscape plan. Existing
landscaping consists of Dwarf Schefflera and Shrub Alamanda adjacent to the front and
side (north) elevations. Variegated Liriope and Hibiscus line the front walkway on the
north side of the property while a Ficus hedge lines the north and south perimeters of
the property on the adjacent lots. Proposed landscaping consists of five Sabal Palms on
the south side of the proposed parking area with three Live Oaks on the north side and
a Silver Buttonwood Tree adjacent to the alley at the southeast corner of the parking
area. The parking area will also be screened by Cocoplum hedge on the north side as
well as the southeast corner, adjacent to the alley. A Triple Solitaire Palm and Glaucous
Cassia with Cocoplum hedges and a mix of underplantings are also proposed by the
southeast corner of the building including: Trailing Chenille and Variegated Trinette.
Two Glaucous Cassia are also shown on the northwest side of the front yard. Cocoplum
hedging is proposed to screen the a/c unit.
HPB Staff Report
203 NE 1st Avenue—Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan
Page 7
Upon relocation of the proposed handicapped parking space in front of the building and
removal of the pavers, landscaping may be enhanced in front of the building with the
addition of vertical landscape elements as well as an increase of foundation plantings
and ground cover. This has been added as a landscape technical item. Further,
pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(A)(1), the proposed cocoplum hedging at the alley
access point must not exceed 36" in order to meet the 20' site visibility triangle. This has
been added as a landscape technical item. Upon meeting the landscape technical
items, as stated above, the proposed landscape plan will be in compliance with LDR
Section 4.6.16.
Landscape Technical Items:
The following technical items must be addressed prior to issuance of a building
permit:
1) That the cocoplum hedging at the alley access point must not exceed 36" in order to
meet the 20' site visibility triangle.
2) That vertical landscape elements as well as an increase of foundation plantings and
ground cover are planted in front of the building upon elimination of the parking
space and removal of the paver blocks.
DESIGN ELEMENTS
LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-k), "Development Standards" provides
guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or
addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows:
The Board Shall Consider:
(E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within
a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated,
demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of
Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time.
(E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a
designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility
can include but is not limited to: (a) height, (b) front façade proportion, (c)
proportion of openings (windows and doors), (d) rhythm of solids to voids:
front facades, (e) rhythm of buildings on streets, (f) rhythm of entrance and/or
porch projections, (g) consistency in relation to materials, texture, color, (h)
roof shapes, (i) walls of continuity, U) scale of a building, and (k) directional
expression of a front elevation.
Conversion to Office
The proposal involves the conversion of a one-story building from residential to office.
The contributing, 1,206 sq. ft., frame vernacular building was constructed in 1937 and
HPB Staff Report
• • 203 NE 1st Avenue—Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan
Page 8
displays clapboard and lap siding, a cross gable shingle roof and flat deck. Fenestration
consists of both wood and aluminum single hung sash windows.
While there are no proposed elevation changes associated with this proposal, it may be
necessary to make modifications in order to meet the Florida Accessibility
Requirements upon relocation of the accessible parking space to the rear of the
building. Therefore, it has been added as a condition of approval that any such
modifications are noted on the site plan and elevations, if applicable.
REQUIRED"FINDINGS '
Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c)(Class III Site Plan Modification), a Class Ill
site plan modification is a modification to a site plan which represents either a
change in intensity of use, or which affects the spatial relationship among
improvements on the land, requires partial review of Performance Standards
found in LDR Sections 3.1.1 and 3.2.3, as well as required findings of LDR Section
2.4.5(G)(5).
Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings), with a Class III site plan
modification formal findings under Section 3.1.1 are not required. However, a
finding that the proposed changes do not significantly affect the originally
approved plan must be made concurrent with approval of a Class III modification.
The development proposal involves a conversion of an existing 1,206 sq. ft. dwelling to
office space and the installation of a new parking area with associated walkways and
landscaping. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), this minor modification does not
significantly impact the findings as they relate to consistency with the Future Land Use
Map, Concurrency or the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with the Land Development
Regulations was discussed earlier in this report. The development proposal has a minor
impact on Concurrency items as discussed below.
Traffic
The subject property is located within the City's TCEA (Transportation Concurrency
Exception Area) designation area, which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD,
and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described
areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance. Therefore, a traffic study is not required for concurrency purposes, however
a traffic statement is necessary to keep a record of trips approved in the TCEA and for
calculation of traffic impact fees. The applicant has submitted a statement which
indicates that the 1,206 sq. ft. dwelling conversion will generate 27 total trips which
represents 17 new daily trips (the current use is allocated at 10 trips per day).
Solid Waste Requirements
The proposed 1,206 sq. ft. office conversion will generate 3.25 tons of solid waste per
year [(1,206 sq.ft. x 5.4Ibs./sq.ft./year = 6,512 lbs/2,000 lb. = 3.25 tons)]. The Solid
Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of service
standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021.
HPB Staff Report
203 NE 1st Avenue—Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan •
Page 9
REVIEW BY OTHERS:
Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA)
At its meeting of June 10, 2004, the CRA Board reviewed and recommended approval
of the site plan modification as proposed.
Pineapple Grove Design Review Committee
The Committee reviewed the project on June 8, 2004. The Committee supported the
project as proposed.
Pineapple Grove Main Street
The Executive Board reviewed the project on June 14, 2004. The group collectively
supported the project with the stipulation that the handicapped accessible space is
relocated to the rear of the building.
ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION
The development proposal involves the conversion of a 1,206 sq.ft. residence to office
space and the installation of associated site improvements including the construction of
eight (8) parking spaces, associated landscaping, internal walkway, and refuse
container enclosure. The proposal will be consistent with LDR Sections 3.1.1,
2.4.5(G)(5), and 4.4.24(F)(2), and policies of the Comprehensive Plan when the
conditions of approval, particularly those related to the parking, are addressed. The
associated waiver and variance cannot be supported based on the lack of site
constraints, concerns related to public safety, and the negative impact it would have on
the character of the neighborhood. Given the above, positive findings can only be made
with respect to 4.6.16, 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-k). As proposed, there is a failure to
make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 2.4.7(B)(5), 4.5.1(J), 4.4.24(G)(3),
and 4.6.9(D)(2) to permit the proposed handicapped accessible space in front of the
building. Therefore, the waivers and variance request should be denied.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS. :
A. Continue with direction.
B. Move approval of the request the COA and associated Class Ill site plan
modification, landscape plan, waivers, and variance for 203 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga
& Lipshy Office, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff
report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and
meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(G)(5), 4.6.16, 4.4.24(F)(2), 4.4.24(G)(3),
4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(a-k), 4.6.9(D)(2), and Chapter 3 of the Land Development
Regulations, subject to the following conditions.
C. Move approval of the request the COA and associated Class III site plan
modification, landscape plan and move denial of the waiver and variance request for
HPB Staff Report
203 NE 15t Avenue—Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan
Page 10
203 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga & Lipshy Office, by adopting the findings of fact and
law contained in the staff report, and finding that the site plan request is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(G)(5),
4.6.16, 4.4.24(F)(2), 4.4.24(G)(3), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(a-k), 4.6.9(D)(2), and Chapter 3
of the Land Development Regulations, subject to conditions.
Move to deny the waivers and variance request by adopting the findings of fact and
law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the
with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections
2.4.5(G)(5), 4.6.16, 4.4.24(F)(2), 4.4.24(G)(3), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(a-k), and
4.6.9(D)(2) of the LDR's and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines.
D. Deny approval of the COA request and associated Class Ill site plan modification,
landscape plan, waiver, and variance for 203 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga & Lipshy
Office, based upon a finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(G)(5), 4.6.16,
4.4.24(F)(2), 4.4.24(G)(3), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(a-k), and 4.6.9(D)(2) of the LDR's and
the Delray Beach Design Guidelines.
`: .STAFF RECOMMENDATION
By Separate Motions:
Variance
Move to deny the request for a variance from LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2), to allow a back-
out parking space at 203 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga & Lipshy Office by adopting the
findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is
inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in
LDR Section 4.5.1(J).
Waivers
Parking in Front Yard
Move to deny the request for the waiver to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), to construct a
parking space within the front building setback at 203 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga & Lipshy
Office, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding
that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the
criteria set forth in LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5).
Maneuvering Area
Move to deny the request for the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(4)(c), to permit the
elimination of the 24' x 6' maneuvering area for the southwest parking space at 203 NE
1st Avenue, Saraga & Lipshy Office, by adopting the findings of fact and law
contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5).
HPB Staff Report
203 NE 1st Avenue—Class III Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan
Page 11
Site Plan Modification
Move approval of the request for Class Ill site plan approval for 203 NE 1st Avenue,
Saraga & Lipshy Office, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff
report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.5(F)(5), 4.4.24(F)(2),
4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-k), and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations,
subject to the following conditions:
1) Address all Site Plan Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the revised
plans;
2) That the 24' x 6' maneuvering area is provided in the parking lot;
3) That the handicapped accessible parking space is relocated to the rear (east) of the
building and the parking space in the front yard is eliminated; and,
4) That accessibility modifications are noted on the site plan and elevations, where
applicable.
Landscape Plan
Move approval of the request for the Landscape Plan approval for 203 NE 1st Avenue,
Saraga & Lipshy Office, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff
report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and
meets criteria set forth in Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations, subject
to the following conditions:
1) Address all Landscape Plan Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the
revised plans.
Attachments:Location Map, Site Plan, Floor Plan, Landscape Plan, Survey
Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner
r, ,
POST
-
CASON OFFICE _
e METHODIST - ��
CHURCH
_ _ .
. •
-� a_ _
a < a_
II
--1 i
- N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD . . ST.
M_ 1 I I l I I l I I F 'MIS
_w MIS IJ 'EE1
z
-
L�I Ir
CITY `''
ATTORNEY > N '�'= w
_o z BUILDING Q •1
MI
I N
M
- MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DR. N.E. 2ND
ST.
Z 3 J
O- Z UCrl _
Z CITY DHALLzcn
o
U)
- N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. /
1ST ST.
_ Q o
Z
COMMUNITY o
— , CENTER }
-3 3 L i LiQ 4i
-z z Z z cr z
D
TENNIS OLD
STADIUM SCHOOL
SQUARE I I =
T
ATLANTIC AVENUE
•SOUTH a 4Q Q I Q Q/
COUNTY
COURT
HOUSE o I-- $-- oIF/
0il
z N N - ♦—
LO
3 3 U U U W
N V) V) fn■ u
ui vi
N
--im.— SARAGA & LIPSITY
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
-- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM766
/NIL'PEAT nID t KwR.CD D ENIONS AC PC.sur WAS 077E+1r5f Ho=
LEGEND
L•LD D4
4-DELTA
R•MOMS 20 0 10 20 40 25.00
RY.•WIEN WO
I InCh = 20 ft. a ctx� FlR I/2 REMAINDER LOT 10, BLOCK 74 I 15,
No IA, i ----�-
nuo.•fcAO.NI C 06Y. o b
44%-PUP o1u HOE • _ 133.00'
Kavn.Minwa CLOOCTt PIMA 7W r x --+�, '• `r ,_--1 r i1R.1/2'
(r)•1FA9.►[ x- . --i---..--._, No I.O.
66•MN
o-1 29.98'� ( ��x__ ite
�: 8919'(II) 0 19.60' g l i ,1 I
Rn-=NT a.a W r' CONC. F r 7.60 i5 {
LAE-u s MON oRI�FwAT ^ 7.60' 14.25' u[TAL SHED
LCL.UW INOOWEC UM110WS Z s '�, / • ;� NO CONC.
ut•OWN WICK
IIJ I G i o
P.O.E...mart PPR Cr a MINKCOINIOCIYON > p 3.5'BMX wnDCj�—i ,' 1-STORY 0 I
WIC.CONCRETE
Q I i v� 4.6 i5 v Rn/203 0
aRgwm Lot
it;' / T` 14.20'
rGl..iF1�WOrt COYI110L PEW N a
r1uL.rtnwrn Ro[wc>:Io+wrtIPA.WEN WU
a 7.60' I
NIL.F I7&L LAMONPP/411,017121. • "� 3 m Iv DECK 2' I /
>m uxn pm(a) Z J , 30.02' 27.25 I /
® am Ina 040 i
# POLL taw c(I •
k 90l2'00'(U) T ❑ 11.s'
1st wawa p10 I 1 °iLL1.x�.�.-,w_•�- • �.r
oaff 11it 1/2• o i33.00'di di ow a(ulrl �!— No I.D. ry�FlR ,/1® /�
�n o No I.D.
cel
- or-- OEMU uo(ON)
25.00' LOT 12, BLOCK 74 1 15'ALLEY
_7/— moo Toncf1
--0.---- NON MCI(C1if''
•
No 1.0.
N.E.2nd STREET
•
CERTIFIED TO:
•
BRIAN LOUTS LIPSHY AND ROBERT S.SARAGA&LIPSHY,P.A.
SARAGA&LIPSHY,P.A.
FIDELTIY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: •
TOWN OF DELRAY,SOUTH 5.5 FEET OF LOT 10,AND ALL OF LOT I I,BLOCK 74,(OLD
SCHOOL HISTORIC DISTRICT),PLAT BOOK I,PAGE 3,OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM
DV 4r.L1/`nr11.rrV t•
I�n•n MN/" OF UUU/VUHKT JUKVL`7' - SCALE: I' 20' nv122/ne vl:�+tMJ aroNaNNI y •�a•��a cF777fICADOi.•
*4'w,sw,r frame WPM.MAW a 77.aIF'I1 f s rticw 12n A<sulaws As srl S£R NNG YGY/fCR OW?10 YEARS
CQsW/N11TY PAWL Na.• FLOW Zone 9ASf5 Q,9EIPoNt' —�- ��ow" /MM si DL DORM 6DYm pr gR7Z=yp�t(,yul[!as NDED /N/99J
()RA I*en elf. -.---�-�. �Ha*4X-4 muza0. ow1N Ir•lt�t
usloz-a 4-o • x ES MEASURED .,.,,m n«,.v I...n,a, Aw w'Owlrw^a2 4 nao.Anrrsns BASELINE AN ENGINEERING
[NECKED en WM .. • nv Amer.=mar.vutra spl,wE moC 7D.70noY NZ P,n STAIVA4
DATE a F N1C BASE 7Zoa0 a BENCHMARK Ar7 R1Ncrs ""u"""�" 1071....1.....1247. C aCL.. � / D
LAND SURVEYING, INC.
1/S/15Ns N/A ,y/A FIELD BOOK: FOLDER PACE: N/A ` .)`ZO103 1400 N.W. 1st COURT
ONLIAN L P02 of* /1°rO° r 80CA RATON, FLORIDA 33432
--•'--'- -- ---'PARTY CHIEF:: PABLO PERAL TA K Rr°�'I a�'o• Piohsaivrd 5r k.V Na 1716 Data
PROPERTY ADDRESS 70.T HE]il ANtSCf-0.2RAY 6YAO 1L$34 4 _-- .,mw.crd�r n�,yp,�ypr ssn'r^n M 9p11•+.•A.If ewair..m rr a• al-6610 (561) 417-0700 LB-64.39
SURVEY DATE: 9/24/03 ro.AV uw>.n[x OF*MI I1D®19iA°'•N9""^'819�4�c MILK n.r
rv.s�wo.YSl..wmarrros.wwn .qB NR: 03-09-0781.9h[Fl nq J
1 5
24.0'..\/...c.06'.0' ra.., F b..........._
--MMHG'6IMCE6 PECII11421% III •1 '•owerle•••••...Fci WeilLTE"•G-- •
erre4.444.ns ea sc.wow FP Auer
WI..414.1•11:14/1LIIIND•1111016 MI FO/111WEE NM,11111111111.•Milan 11440/1/ i i i
- A I 1r Mt e40n4s we 14, _; I
1.04310,11.b.ace e
111:41IIKING tribaa'DR:WIPED: LEGAL DESCIIIPTIONs
,,,
• 84.1111VIO IMINIPIMPAPIP• •41W11111
'/.7. /__<1 F WOO•,,r,tV IA.....,-A A ,0 A - corm droamprems.. 1 MIMI
. . .r.„:„,{ 47.r17:174117"1"19------ .1. EMPINVO/0 IF/111111111,0
.1011.3.MILLI'OW.W Cf LOT 19.MP ALL O I.1.0r1LOUSCICLUCLO161001.661.11
1114.10<MAO. TOW. ,,, , ip,444,0*.I•44,40•44_,_‘14GIFVFit/ur././ • a.•:si . =a1MrelaWW: .
sr••••••ser wools. • aux ow••••'.1, • 41.4.Npoei•VviNNy0.!,,--.,ww-xsssnw, -...4 ....um c. ,ri..0 POCK trWIL POMP MUG••••moi1cr mew ccureb
4,/ N'ASWN'ttteW44.°'Z'AP•giliOrA ral '..""..“firIPAIN/"""Ziate• •OVEIO_._.- •---- 7; frikee,APellig-0141%V4:: P44 ---
L f4Pe***kiNtrtli4i;:/1.4$Z4r41 l'' A EXIETING IMPACT DATOW ,
'0 Vi-Ar-61,4A.-.::;&itV4.44" 5: loOPPOSED IMPACT DATA: •
11•10.1 WWI%PIM MP MM., "VtIktg'S"..:104,,C1050-41.,(?A: illig
OW NTIVAPID MOM MANAPANOIS 1.0, ttilf.1 gr.1040IMPrall'Pe4?!.• ii I 1111IJORgal AM•
'Eee WASS IWO/CM• .Wpm OM••Wu IP MN
e.Wilklm UM .41400 1
'.0•204114e*.40 tAiit4r4 r p . OW laralIMIS WM• .WAY KM .21/1011111
1-1/111.111 4•1116/1/WO
I E.
rAft$444„044e, 'AflitiS iii i =--. - 1,011■111111.R. 111•1•1114/111
00100044•Wata,.. ... 1 VAIEDS MOW 1110 POINNID 11111.01111111011M PI I MONIVIIVIGIMICOMPICI
_.• itiitti,t0ikAAPONA f ,e•' ••• 2=7Z7Z-Nomek. *PS
_ L. .A.4, kivg
•....0 fte4,4,,,,,A. A r.
1 ai%"Vti3., nir ,,,,s,•snr% 61/11/11,• CILD 1C11301.111011.111$0=113•1/1116 WNW
14111141141111.111Mer• !Homo 11001 8111111V/10•
immi1111116141110 WM• te WI
4.*VIM
r:•1•14ititS.Z.ti;e15" frTes"..,.11____ *Mb INC1111111114111,41.MIMI ALIO KO WM IOW• 1141
J .6.1.g/A'abEsokell: /est13.14E ',
2=721=4V111/01. "1:411" LJJ J
Aprittl,.:,,git Ifit,bitts:. 1 ,
le 0 s
614 Peli. s-.":'4I;•..41'l'i•ii 1 41 1-pm/••••••44.•wow re mu/
- 1? 1? lifite VASA Piel.„4 VO..f j
ID
RV:0 kill 14 i,... 1.1.4%.41.116.'"'"VIIMMILI''' •11.1011.0 14•11.CAIWN II 6001
r
•441.444411180 - :R111. ., ber..mem c•twereava we mac we mem.ler ow 0 1 g n'w H
“tePtlf 04115../43,TM.. 41rAltIlta&P:4:: AMNIA.! 41PLA,..'...4 lag t Y.' Matga"' E g;0 .----------,--LIA,1111.641,, -4-ca...•••••••••Imo re rm.
"" iipp, ; „..........r. li, •
Iv' triar"-r-rAsz.iii- " "- I 5". 1 NA 411000 Mat Wm raNTID WM :
I LIONMAGVIL
.1 WA FOOT 11111.01.11,P.M,PM
1.11,10.1/POW 110.1,1.1111,71M-41.01 I ., M/;y Av.-,.., I MON 0.011-4
,!..., If.
G i 1f44,Y./,.9,./. 411... i g 00•111".14.1.610,11100.PO WWI WOW WW1
b1.1.1144.11101.6i TO WWI . . /0/,g1;0,
/,,//////%74
il I 6.1.4.••••• I
I 4/,
' ' '/7/" 1 A „ •...... •
_ . ,-„,
g 1
; ,V,7,07,/,,%, .
,xt:',,,,,<I0,,p%, 9;tYVf.,04/,, 11 (-'.5', EX18T/i46 14:TORY r ..
w000 text OVAL I moo°SalAGE I
F we/ems
1
6:tk%/0/4:0 %°;A' CI 4 6TRUCTURE I *YAW 1,144
V / /•*4M*X*.*X•;', • 11., warrmewm••••••••••.,, I
II4001141VIITOPOTI•PKOMP----__. .. ...... /•,<,:,///' kt,70,41,1, •••:'././,'/://,', , '-••030710 MO tV10,1M1710 4LE.001P.P.PO pow.
..../..,1=1;g4re11•1•-•.-•-_...--___:: V VI,,i1.1/_. fe#Stels_ate al,,,tel arrAmpH/C'....;',1 . 1-memo oommeet 1.1.111,0411111.0Ve1141•1/10 10 e11,01111.1•111 ...-\ //•---\ tt 1).
•1.:sr .
0 8 g--- -- ell MO DOM,04.V.MAN
OWL TM,.I U 8 11291/1927.1+?,#. d.,'•1 1A- PP..•114.114611.111.1"01.104Y.
L
..c .. . X
.................. , . 0.. ..I.---=go -. - ,.= ....." "" 4
I- _,/,=•bsonso mow •....1 .
1? 11/.10* • 11,10.1.COMPI*0 Mi. .0:' ilt.440:5;:k•
- is V kAsz9pe40
MP - 'moo covoteo.4.3.owe* ,0. ,4A,..,It 1 7 991111bila I Arnitival _
A °Mt PROM= H1÷pew -I 1C=J
• irif TIT 1 47 T P.1/11--E 0-11'W i c AO- 0.41t-'44A411 ',I,,
1. III..f I..I..I If 1;t /.I..[fit IC _I
II'
.. - 41111111111"1111 -4" '..t'',$10. Aks. t t// 1_
1 4 1 - i.ortograni"=”14•4-) ' I Mk --- - south
,P.IMPUIPP C•21.0101.43.11.1..
MOT'MN 41.4•10.W.T.I.NTIT 1 11.1,111q4 rt.*-• P0011411
WM.AP Vt..IMPIPT•1NTWAL V 4)PM.=
INN
/, SIKE mac ormi. I
w F.
.._ ..., 60/11/.1,N. 114•Il No. •i.:_FILE
5' • .' - . 6041414_, ..../ .
sod
• 4
- •
• • •r•r
1.4 tormi44 11. ,
st NORM-EAST 1ST AVENUE 4t,WEAK,ORM.tIP,2001.
.....4•7==V.'• ...Z--Of .-.:- .
I I 2 1 s )1 , 12 I IS I 11
DEER Y.BEApl DEEBAY BEACH
1d d HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD e
11/1► MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT !'���►
1993 1993
2001
2001
Agent: Francisco Perez, Authorized Agent
Project Name: Willis Residence Addition
Project Location: 160 Marine Way
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
enclosure of a 188 sq. ft. loggia on a contemporary portion of the a contributing dwelling
at 160 Marine Way, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
BACKGROUND
The subject property consists of Lot 14, Block 126, Town of Delray. Located on the west
side of Marine Way, the property is zoned Medium Density Residential (RM) and
includes a 2,510 sq. ft. contributing dwelling constructed in 1940 (including a 1,795 sq.
ft., second- story addition constructed in 1995 which utilized the existing guest cottage).
The historic residence was constructed in the Minimal Traditional style and the addition
continues that style with a smooth stucco exterior and gable roof. The dwelling is
considered contributing within the Marina Historic District.
On December 2, 1992, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved the
construction of a trellis over the front porch and along the north elevation. The trellis
was subsequently constructed as proposed.
During its meeting of April 21, 1993, the Board reviewed a variance request to allow a
trellis to extend more than five (5) feet beyond the main dwelling and be constructed to
the north property line to accommodate a carport. The trellis was proposed to screen
the driveway on the north side of the property. The variance was granted and the trellis
constructed.
On May 18, 1994, the Board approved the construction of a 1,795 sq. ft., second-story
addition. The project included connecting the main dwelling and extant guest cottage
(which was located to the west of the main dwelling) and included construction of a
loggia. The project was completed as proposed.
The applicant is now before the Board for the enclosure of the existing 188 sq. ft. loggia
on the contemporary portion of the dwelling.
Meeting Date:August 18,2004
Agenda Item: IV.A.
160 Marine Way addition COA 2004-334
Marina Historic District
Page 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing the enclosure of the 188 sq. ft. loggia located on the first
floor of the dwelling between the living area and the previous guest cottage (presently a
garage). Effected elevations are on the north and south sides of the building. The
enclosure consists of the installation of two paired divided light French doors with stucco
relief arches above. Decorative wood knee braces support proposed wood trellises
which extend three (3) feet beyond the footprint of the building into the side setbacks.
Existing wood supports are to be removed.
ANALYSIS
Structures Allowed in Setbacks
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(H)(4)(I), trellises which may extend to no more than five
(5) feet from the side of the principal building or extend more than two (2) feet from the
front or rear of the principle building may encroach into the setback.
LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j)
"Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of
Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features.
The guidelines are as follows:
The Board Shall Consider:
(E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within a
historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated,
demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time.
(E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration,
reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or
structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility
standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non-
contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance of any
existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated
historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass,
configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings,
structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing
building, structure, or site.
(E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated
historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is
not limited to: (g) consistency in relation to materials, texture, color.
, 160 Marine Way addition COA 2004-334
4 Marina Historic District
Page 3
The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that:
1) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy
historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be
differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale,
and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its
environment.
The proposed enclosure of the loggia will mimic the smooth stucco exterior found on the
remainder of the dwelling. The proposed fenestration, with its divided light pattern, will
also match that found on the building. Based upon building permit records, the original
loggia was constructed to meet the side interior setback of 7.6'; however, an updated
survey depicting the existing site conditions is required and will be necessary in order to
obtain a building permit (survey provided dated June 3, 1992). As the enclosure of the
loggia will not increase the footprint of the building and since the trellis is permitted to
encroach into the side setbacks up to five (5) feet, the enclosure and construction of the
trellis can be supported. Further, based on the inconspicuous location of the loggia and
since the enclosure consists of a portion of the contemporary addition, the enclosure
does not negatively impact the integrity of the historic portions of the dwelling. The
project, as proposed, can therefore be supported based upon positive findings with
respect to LDR Sections 4.3.4(H)(4)(I), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(g) and the -
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
A. Continue with direction.
B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the enclosure of the 188 sq.
ft. loggia at 160 Marine Way, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in
the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.3.4(H)(4)(I), and 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7),
and (E)(8)(g) of the LDRs and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation, subject to conditions.
C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the enclosure of the 188 sq. ft.
loggia at 160 Marine Way, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the
staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.3.4(H)(4)(I), and 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and
(E)(8)(g) of the LDRs and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
RECOMMENDATION
Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the enclosure of the 188 sq. ft.
loggia at 160 Marine Way, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff
report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and
meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.3.4(H)(4)(I), and 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(g) of
160 Marine Way addition COA 2004-334
Marina Historic District
Page 4
the LDRs and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the
following condition:
1) That an updated survey depicting the existing site conditions is provided, prior to
issuance of a building permit.
Attachments: Survey, Proposed Elevations &Floor Plan
\Q Fouao
// r 1vff,V CA•3y1B353
c.d.S. / 311 r —', 'p A r .
(!- �__ CONC. K/A LK
fa,A10 of Hall
r.r
�11 .) 9 Q
/ '\- (..... k %23 N
fi
,F O C .tom p, ,O/ANC `��.','9.,._-. _____—___' A-r •
• t• 1 /7'/a'H,f' 1 h C A'
,,,,,,e-wc _if =,_4 y:v._
— 1 I s r ----- ...4i
Ik
t 4,4,� D
;o
h Ze,S' WA", 33.9'
•
,p
'i
„ '
\ /49' r 37.5' 73.5' 3o./' 33.9-
O.T.-.L p .4 1
il
_0
,,.,
,...
,..
._ k 4 ks,,, J , ,„.
Y -. .1 t. .th„..,tzlii,
Y
,cfo,✓v,[kvr . 96 Oc _
• sEr .
_ AxcAAP /413. OD' F,.err_., se,,aoA,.,o
'Au," N✓OF./A'l w/lA/C.rP
--- �� A[B353 l'aiGak
-- -.--- - -----?--.
CAecf lY
_ r/NEs
\___. • ________,-,-
\ Z
of se,Qi ario,✓- BO1//1/.0,9, K 5W/PVE/
FO.F'
Lois/3, fl d0/5-, A fa804//sio./ Ai,. �.,y,2s 5TE P,SfE.G#',e. ECMDiS
. of Bcoc /. , oe-z, 1,qy Flo,P/D,l,
9Pc'o'Po/ivo ra T,YL-PL,1T T!!f'Qra/
SQEOO,QD ' /e,/,"Z do,(//, ,a,/Gc 1 IIFnEar CERTIFY that U.plat shown h.r.un Is.true.nd Correct
a'r,', -,e,e/BL/C, e-L'o,QOS 4F,0,9L,r�I row a=.ntal,n of =survey of the lends deacrlbed h.reon merle In
,/1 I 1 �oUNTY co .c.wd.nc..Ith tl..minimum ThnIcjt =t2..pt..For I.nd surveying
.p /F ,P/Oi9. lnl .eir•Icaa..ld.._.et /orttl Ly chapter 2111H-6 Florida
11�1e Jr e.Inp net
O
,77/AZ7s,,t...ir
"C et%•'= cDNc er . ' C,10 SdQI/EfO,Q,!/o"391Z
1 '
p- 'reB.s---emic.Bee e,e,p5///Pco
FLooO Zat/E= Are- EL 7 O'BRIEN, SUITER I& O'BRIEN, INC.
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS
2601 NORTH FEDERAL HIOHWO, DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
✓v VC A /992 a pd tra.:/,,,.24' .
' I' mo —".o:91-//D.i
7`�.,3 AI✓� ( tar 7lv C, Ye1'?I) ,1/ A- /6 d Ac,/e, n`V
Cl -1 c� Ov a 1 // - l— ef�G J"S /]2� 76>L3 / �
P'Go✓ U ccp}/ ./ GV.Bm , /S LL-cc"4leS -"di is IiY at/ce � r
f �Axe-4 ra s1 Q6 a, ra / csdot d, cIy Z. °473t nt2 . Lo-f /r cu:v..... _Ay
DELRAY BGCH DELRAY BEACH
HISTORIC: PRESERVATION BOARD
liii
MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT IUJ.►
1993 2190093
2001 1
Project Name: NW Swinton Avenue Historic District
Historic designation report for a historic district
ITEM BEFORE THE , BOARD: ;
The action requested of the Board is to review the designation report for the NW
Swinton Avenue Historic District and to set a date for the public hearing, pursuant
to LDR Section 4.5.1(C).
BAC`KGR.OUND
The City of Delray Beach has proposed to designate the area discussed in the
attached designation report to the Local Register of Historic Places. To qualify as
a historic site or historic district, the property or properties must fulfill one or more
of the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(2) and/or (3). The designation
report contains, at a minimum, sufficient information to conform to the criteria
stated in LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3), a district is deemed to have architectural or
aesthetic significance if it fulfills one or more of the following criteria:
(a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or
more distinctive architectural styles; and,
(b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style,
period, or method of construction;
(c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer,
landscape architect, or builder, or
(d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of
outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant
innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment.
To qualify as a historic site, or historic district, or historic interior, individual
properties, structures, sites, or buildings, or groups of properties, structures,
sites, or buildings must have significant character, interest, or value as part of the
historical, cultural, aesthetic, and architectural heritage of the city, state, or
nation.
The designation report demonstrates that the area qualifies as a historic district
as the area: (a) portrays high styles and local interpretations of distinctive
Meeting Date: August 18, 2004
Agenda Item: V.A.
HPB Staff Report
NW Swinton Avenue Designation Report-
Page 2
architectural styles and (b) embodies distinctive characteristics typical of those
styles and period of construction. Designating the district as historic will help
preserve the character of the extant historic dwellings and promote the retention
of the scale of the neighborhood.
RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C)(4), Designation Procedures, after formally
reviewing the designation report, set a date for the required public hearing for the
HPB meeting of September 15, 2004.
Attachment:NW Swinton Avenue Historic District Designation Report
Northwest Swinton Avenue
Historic District
Designation Report
City of Delray Beach
August 18, 2004
I. Statement of Purpose
Northwest Swinton Avenue Historic District
The proposal to establish the Northwest Swinton Avenue as a designated historic
district was city initiated and began in June 2004 as a direct result of the
relocation of a contributing frame vernacular historic dwelling from 508 North
Swinton Avenue to 1440 North Swinton Avenue. The boundaries were
established in order to provide a symmetrical and uniform boundary. The district
was expanded to include up to NW 2nd Avenue to the west as the existing Del-Ida
Park Historic District and proposed Dell Park Historic District provided protection
for those historic properties to the east along North Swinton Avenue. The district
was chosen for designation based upon its high architectural integrity and
diversity of architectural styles as well as its contiguous expanse of extant
contributing historic buildings and structures.
II. Location Map and Boundary Description
The proposed Northwest Swinton Avenue Historic District encompasses the
properties directly north of and adjacent to (but not including) the Trinity Lutheran
property to the south; NW 17th Street to the north; the west side of North Swinton
Avenue to the east; and NW 2"d Avenue to the west (see attached map).
—Y 1L1lJJim
= CHURCH PALMS �, l [ ,
Ohl"'kr 7 ' "I 1p
E .,.: '.� �.>a1 N.E. rem slNur
�., N.W. 16TH Sr. ■....,.F PLUMOSA
•^i®�®U "onio ■u ELE MEN SCHOOL0 Ari i 6
MINNOW wiiiiiiwa
RY
5 I
Sr. Ji n
RIF NW.17TH ST. N.W. 17TH ST. ff/ minium
rd®® J ■,, .. ! N.E. 1711 L NT\ LAKE
rff4
DPoVEAWA ) .
.. N.W. /��iJsTH ST. . .
i.. '%� I :m I' N.E. 16TH ST. N.E. 16TH ST.
111M N.W. 157H ST I. UI1 \
N.W. 14TH ST. — I g���g� Il' min,J N.E. 15TH ST.
x 1 ;.u'
Am
N.W. 13TH ST. ^'��/JJJJJJffffff///JJJ/// f/f0fU/�/{J/f' N.E. 14TH S.
w AY 1
ri
Ill �CI�' ■II�
N.W. 12TH STREET �{ � � N.E 13TM ST.
Milli 111111111.11—
1111111
N.W. 12TH CT.
z < a
■. -. N.E. 12TH ST.
:::: Miff
—1 N.W. - f N.W.,..-11�..ST. N.E. 11TH ST.
_—�� ..EariA o
3 3 n
I iggPirl
i
; 1 ® ' N.E. 10TT1 S
%!!lJJJJ////
rHIBSWS LANE \� <m® iff%f/// .
�, U '■ ,i.,,,,,, _,
g� !% r�J.Jp N.E. 9TH ST.
wN.anti �� N.W. 9TM I:n»T I z %//Fi.Y!!, :,'■■,,:W
LAKE MEM ®ram; ■■I■IIII`
s .A"..
_ 1111,-� �- e�} f�f GEOR BUSH BOULEVARD
N, IVI
_ O ,
z „%tG (lA
N.W. 7TH ST. // � e ,, �,�1
I
111111111 "",_ Iwo ��� Y/.E�/// IlE 7m ST. ,, � ,
GAR ENIA ri
I
AMA.
„� UKE IERR ' : ,11 .ii ,,,,.
gall
N W 61H ST. < �
7 N.E.6M ST.
Mil ■
5,:t' -k4s?a;
soil . woo mom<aim o In,ti � > ' j
��.H S3■.�• ',Ls w000
o`
AG LYNN
Fl RD `, . = N.E. 5TH Cr.
III I 41.0 r . �t.
IDA �.' `,Q I o
II R - -
O q O 80Y SCOUT TRINITY N.E. 5TH ST. 5j
HUT LUTHERAN
'EN �—
I I I I I I I I CARECROMM. \'
N PROPOSED WEST SWINTON HISTORIC DISTRICT
—7111111111-- LEGEND:
PUNNING DEPART/OJT
CITY CF OEIRAY BEACH.R CONTRISURIIG HISTORIC BOUNDARY
—DIGITAL BASF YIP S757EV—
WP REF:1AN176
Ill. Architectural Significance
The period of significance for the area is 1925 -1950 based upon dates of
construction. Predominant architectural styles include: Mission Revival, Frame
Vernacular, Masonry Vernacular, and Mediterranean-Revival, and Minimal
Traditional. The following is a brief description of those styles:
Frame Vernacular - Constructed of wood
framing and reflecting no high architectural style
or formal architectural design, the vernacular
5 house can be either symmetrical or
Ilimne
1111 re III asymmetrical in design. Built by laymen, often
..tor IIII1lhiiilump! lit the owner, with no formal construction
experience who utilized local building materials
and craftsmanship techniques (also Masonry Vernacular).
-''- Mission Revival - Minimally ornamented with
built-up, flat roofs often with stepped or
_.. 11Imi l - curvilinear parapets, a wood or hollow clay tile
frame with smooth or rough textured stucco
exterior. Tile visor roofs over windows and
'I entryways are also common. Fenestration often
includes casement windows and arched
entryways.
Mediterranean Revival (1915-1940) -
Influenced by the Italian and Spanish
styles and popularized by Henry I
Flagler and Addison Mizner, this style ;r ,_,..'! _' '
displays low pitched, multi-plane roof bbb
lines often with red clay tiles and littlefl I
or no overhang. Tile visor roofs are
L,
also common. A stucco exterior, often
textured, covers an asymmetrical,
wood or hollow clay tile frame. Arches
are prevalent within the fenestration design including entryways, arcades, and
colonnades.
Minimal Traditional (1935-1950)—Typically, a one-story building displaying a
low or intermediate pitched gable roof with a
nr! large chimney. Shares Tudor style traits such
.44111001111111111111411111111111116as rock or brick facing (particularly on the
�rr'..it1111�.. chimney) and minimal wood detailing.
P:I
���� a l . Popularized after World War II, this style is
I , ;n often associated with tract housing.
? ("
IV. Historical & Cultural Significance
The west side of North Swinton Avenue (today a portion of the Lake Ida Park
Neighborhood) was traditionally an agricultural area. The neighborhood's building
stock developed substantially in the 1920s with the commercial promotion of
south Florida as a tourist destination and a mecca for investment opportunities.
The first houses seen in the area were constructed in the Frame Vernacular and
Mediterranean influenced styles such as Mission-Revival and Spanish Eclectic
and were strictly residential in nature. It was noted by early residents that
construction of homes during the 1920s were limited to Swinton Avenue and that
anything to the west of Swinton consisted of merely Palmetto Trees and Scrub
Oaks; a local hangout for area children to play.
One particular dwelling of note is located at 704 North Swinton Avenue and
designed by famed local architect, Sam Ogren, Sr. (1899-1988). Mr. Ogren
relocated from Tampa to West Palm Beach in 1924 as an apprentice to William
Manly King, a regional architect. The dwelling at 704 North Swinton Avenue was
Mr. Ogren's first design in Delray Beach. The building so impressed local officials
that he was offered the position of City Architect. Between 1924-1950, he
designed over 250 buildings. His most noted works reflected the Mediterranean-
Revival style which can be seen in the Arcade Tap Room Building, Crest
Theatre, and Old School Square Gymnasium located in downtown Delray Beach.
Another notable home in the area is the Marshall DeWitt Residence located at
1108 North Swinton Avenue. Constructed in 1935-1936, the DeWitt house was
designed by famed architect Gustav Maas and built by R.C. Lawson. At twenty
years old, Marshall DeWitt relocated to Delray Beach in 1928 from Duluth,
Minnesota just two months before the 1928 hurricane. DeWitt prospered in the
area as a successful farmer during the Depression years and grew active in the
community. DeWitt and his wife Jeanette Butts DeWitt (of the Butts Agricultural
family) were prominent members of Delray Beach society. Mr. DeWitt served as
the Chairman of the Board for the First National Bank in Delray, was a member
of the City Commission and served as Mayor in the mid to late 1940s..
The W. Seward Webb, Jr. home, located at 1634 North Swinton Avenue, was
constructed c.1930. Webb moved to Gulfstream with his mother Lila Vanderbuilt
Webb, of the renowned Vanderbuilt family, between 1923 and 1924. Webb
constructed the home as his personal residence and was a long-time resident of
Delray Beach until his death in January 1956.
Other noteworthy properties include 1420 North Swinton Avenue was the
residence of Paul E. Gringle, a prominent Delray Beach realtor and 1602 North
Swinton Avenue was home to F.J. Schrader, a local architect and builder who
designed the 1926 Bungalow presently owned and occupied by the Delray Beach
Historical Society (5 NE 1st Avenue).
The neighborhood expanded considerably during the 1930s and 1940s as
tourists rented out local houses and those servicemen stationed in the
Boca/Delray area required housing. The next building boom came after World
War II, when those GIs stationed in the area before the war returned to settle
down and start their families. The 1953 Delray Beach City Directory noted a
substantial number of properties in this area as seasonal and apartment rentals.
The majority of the remainder of the neighborhood's building stock was
constructed during the 1950s and 1960s and is considered non-contributing due
to either age or lack of architectural integrity.
V. Statement of Significance
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3), a district is deemed to have architectural or
aesthetic significance if it fulfills one or more of the following criteria:
(a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or
more distinctive architectural styles; and,
(b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style,
period, or method of construction;
(c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer,
landscape architect, or builder; or
(d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of
outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant
innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment.
To qualify as a historic site, or historic district, or historic interior, individual
properties, structures, sites, or buildings, or groups of properties, structures,
sites, or buildings must have significant character, interest, or value as part of the
historical, cultural, aesthetic, and architectural heritage of the city, state, or
nation.
The area qualifies as a historic district under the following criterion: (a) portrays
high styles and local interpretations of distinctive architectural styles and (b)
embodies distinctive characteristics typical of those styles and period of
construction. A significant concentration of the Mission Revival, Frame
Vernacular, Masonry Vernacular, Mediterranean-Revival, and Minimal Traditional
styles of architecture are prevalent within the proposed boundaries and the
contributing status of these building is considerable as the majority of the
buildings have maintained their architectural integrity.
VI. Bibliography and Sources
Delray Beach Surveys - Florida Master Site File Forms 1999, 2001
Mayhew III, Clemmer, Palm Beach Post, August 9, 1987.
Posey, William M., "The DeWitt Family & Delray Beach, 1928-1993," DeWitt
Homes & Garden Showcase, Old School Square Centennial Celebration, March
1995.
Miller's Delray Beach, Florida City Directory, Volume III., 1953-1954.
Farrar, Cecil W. and Margo Ann, "Incomparable Delray Beach: Its Early Life and
Lore," Fiesta-Life on the Gold Coast, May, 1973.
NW Swinton Avenue Survey
Address Parrel Control Number Contributing Non-Contributing Date of Construrtion FMSF
1 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-001-0010 0 0 1983 0
10 NW 15 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0200 0 0 1963 0
10 NW 17 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0090 0 0 1950 0
10 NW 9 Street 12-43-46-08-21-010-0020 0 0 1928 ❑
100 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0050 ❑ 0 1962 0
100 Wood Lane 12-43-46-08-23-000-0010 ❑ 0 1984 ❑
1001 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-009-0160 0 0 1963 0
1002 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-009-0150 0 ❑ 1950 ❑
1007 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-40-000-0010 0 0 1950 0
101 NW 15 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0140 ❑d ❑ 1951 ❑
101 NW 17 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0091 0 Ei 1955 0
101 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-001-0050 0 0 1970 0
101 NW 9 Street 12-43-46-08-05-000-0140 ❑ k 1995 0
1010 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-009-0140 ❑ 0 1957 ❑
101 NW 11 Street 12-43-46-08-08-000-0040 0 0 1961 0
Wednesday,August Il,2004
_.,.._... '.....,.,_ . a ' L-7',a _.7
_.5, ,��_,.._ ___r...._. ,... Page I of II
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-Contributing Date of Construction FMSF
102 Grove Way 12-43-46-08-09-000-0090 ❑ 0 1956 0
102 NW 12 Street 12-43-46-08-16-002-0181 0 El 1959 ❑
102 NW 15 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0220 ❑ 0 1961 ❑
102 NW 16 Street 12-43-46-08-10-000-0090 0 0 1950 111
102 NW 7 Street 12-43-46-08-15-007-0010 ❑�/ ❑ 1951 ❑
102 NW 7 Street 12-43-46-08-15-007-0010 ❑�/ ❑ 1951 ❑
103 NW 9 Street 12-43-46-08-05-000-0130 0 0 1994 ❑
105 NW 7 Street 12-43-46-08-15-002-0050 0 ❑ 1950 ❑
107 NW 15 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0130 0 0 1951 0
107 NW 17 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0082 ❑d 0 1954 0
107 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-001-0060 ❑ 0 1956 0
107 NW 9 Street 12-43-46-08-05-000-0091 0 0 1955 0
108 NW 15 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0230 ❑ 0 1969 0
108 NW 16 Street 12-43-46-08-10-000-0072 ❑ 0 1956 ❑
108 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0060 0 0 1962 ❑
109 NW 12 Street 12-43-46-08-16-001-0091 0 ❑ 1952 0
109 NW 16 Street 12-43-46-08-10-000-0050 0 ❑ 1989 ❑
Wednesday,August Il,2004. Page 2 of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-Contributing Date of Construction FMSF
11 Groove Way 12-43-46-08-09-000-0020 0 0 1956 ❑
11 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-001-0020 0 0 1955 0
11 NW 7 Street 12-43-46-08-21-010-0090 0 0 1928 ❑
110 Grove Way 12-43-46-08-09-000-0080 0 0 1951 0
110 NW 11 Street 12-43-46-08-21-009-0030 0 0 1947 0
110 Wood Lane 12-43-46-08-23-000-0020 0 0 1986 0
1102 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-008-0010 0 ❑ 1926 ❑
1107 Periwinkle Lane 12-43-46-08-08-000-0060 ❑ ❑d 2000 ❑
111 NW 11 Street 12-43-46-08-08-000-0020 0 0 1964 0
111 NW 6 Street 12-43-46-08-15-007-0090 0 0 1959 0
1110 North Swinton Avenie 12-43-46-08-17-000-0081 0 ❑ 1936 ❑
1112 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-16-002-0250 0 ❑ 1931 ❑
114 NW 12 Street 12-43-46-08-16-002-0151 0 0 1948 0
114 NW 16 Street 12-43-46-08-10-000-0071 0 ❑ 1954 0
114 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0070 0 0 1964 0
114 NW 6 Street 12-43-46-08-15-006-0110 0 ❑ 1950 0
114 NW 7 Street 12-43-46-08-15-007-0030 0 0 1960 0
Wednesday,August 11,2004 Page 3 of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-Contributing Date of Construction FMSF
115 NW 12 Street 12-43-46-08-16-001-0101 0 ❑ 1951 0
115 NW 17 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0081 0 0 1952 ❑
115 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-001-0070 0 0 1965 0
118 NW 11 Street 12-43-46-08-21-009-0040 0 ❑ 1950 0
12 NW 11 Street 12-43-46-08-36-000-0020 ❑ 0 2000 0
12 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0020 0 0 1958 ❑
120 Wood Lane 12-43-46-08-23-000-0030 0 0 1995 ❑
1201 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-16-001-0010 0 ❑ 1941 ❑
121 NW 12 Street 12-43-46-08-16-001-0121 0 ❑ 1951 0
121 NW 6 Street 12-43-46-08-15-007-0101 ❑ 0 1959 ❑
1220 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-09-000-0120 0 ❑ 1949 ❑
125 Wood Lane 12-43-46-08-23-000-0040 0 0 1993 0
1301 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-09-000-0051 ❑ 0 1958 0
1310 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-09-000-0010 0 ❑ 1946 ❑
1315 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-007-0050 ❑ 0 1965 0
14 NW 12 Street 12-43-46-08-16-002-0221 ❑d ❑ 1952 ❑
1404 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-007-0060 0 ❑ 1928 ❑
Wednesday,August 11,2004 .___ ,....,�. w,.,...��..-._ ..,
Page4of11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-Contributing Date of Construction FMS'F
1413 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-007-0040 0 0 1957 0
1420 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-007-0010 0 ❑ 1928 ❑
1421 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-007-0030 0 0 1973 ❑
1425 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-007-0020 0 0 1973 ❑
1440 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-006-0190 ❑ 0 1955 ❑
145 NW 15 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0120 0 0 1951 0
15 NW 15 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0160 ❑ 0 1969 0
15 NW 17 Court 12-43-46-08-21-006-0020 0 0 1956 0
15 NW 17 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0121 0 0 1952 0
150 NW 15 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0240 0 0 1953 ❑
1500 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-006-0170 ❑ 0 1960 ❑
1510 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-006-0100 0 ❑ 1925 ❑
1604 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-10-000-0010 0 ❑ 1931 ❑
1607 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-10-000-0060 W 0 1954 ❑
1611 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-006-0060 0 0 1955 0
1616 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-07-010-0090 0 ❑ 1928 ❑
1617 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-006-0050 0 0 1955 0
Wednesday,August 11,2004 S of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-Contrihuting Date of Construction FMSF
1623 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-006-0040 ❑ 0 1955 0
1634 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-006-0010 0 ❑ 1928 ❑
17 NW 15 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0150 0 0 1952 0
17 NW 16 Street 12-43-46-08-10-000-0020 0 0 1956 0
17 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-001-0030 0 0 1969 0
18 Grove Way 12-43-46-08-09-000-0110 ❑ 0 1957 0
18 NW 12 Street 12-43-46-08-16-002-0210 0 0 1952 0
18 NW 15 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0210 0 0 1950 ❑
18 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0030 0 0 1959 0
19 NW 17 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0111 0 0 1954 0
2 NW 12 Street 12-43-46-08-16-002-0240 0 0 1960 0
2 NW 15 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0180 ❑ 0 1959 0
2 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0010 0 0 1980 0
20 NW 11 Street 12-43-46-08-21-009-0010 0 0 1955 0
202 Grove Way 12-43-46-08-09-000-0070 0 0 1962 11
21 Grove Way 12-43-46-08-09-000-0030 0 ❑ 1945 0
21 NW 11 Street 12-43-46-08-08-000-0050 0 0 1956 ❑
Wednesday,August 11,2004 �........�___..._..�... �.,...�..___..�._.- ,�� Page 6 of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-Contributing Date of Construction FM,SF
21 NW 12 Street 12-43-46-08-16-001-0051 ❑ 0 1960 ❑
21 NW 17 Court 12-43-46-08-21-006-0080 ❑ 0 1956 0
21 NW 9 Street 12-43-46-08-21-009-0260 0 0 1949 0
22 Grove Way 12-43-46-08-09-000-0100 ❑ 0 1958 0
23 NW 17 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0101 0 0 1952 ❑
23 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-001-0040 ❑d ❑ 1951 ❑
24 NW 18 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0040 0 0 1956 0
25 NW 16 Street 12-43-46-08-10-000-0030 ❑ 0 1959 0
25 NW 8 Street 12-43-46-08-21-010-0040 0 0 1968 0
26 NW 12 Street 12-43-46-08-16-002-0191 0 0 1947 0
28 NW 16 Street 12-43-46-08-10-000-0100 0 0 1954 0
28 NW 17 Court 12-43-46-08-21-006-0070 ❑ 0 1956 0
3 NW 17 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0132 ❑d ❑ 1954 ❑
30 NW 11 Street 12-43-46-08-21-009-0020 0 0 1948 ❑
30 NW 11 Street 12-43-46-08-21-009-0020 0 0 1948 0
31 NW 16 Street 12-43-46-08-10-000-0040 0 0 1949 0
33 Grove Way 12-43-46-08-09-000-0041 0 0 1951 0
Wednesday,August 11,2004 page 7 ofll
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-Contributing Date of Construction FMSF
33 NW 12 Street 12-43-46-08-16-001-0080 ❑ 0 1957 0
34 NW 17 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0030 ❑ 0 1956 0
4 NW 16 Street 12-43-46-08-21-006-0110 0 0 1951 0
440 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-012-0040 0 ❑ 1935 ❑
440 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-012-0040 ❑d ❑ 1935 ❑
450 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-012-0010 ❑d ❑ 1928 ❑
508 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-011-0090 ❑d ❑ 1940 ❑
508 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-011-0090 0 0 1940 ❑
510 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-011-0110 ❑d ❑ 1930 ❑
515 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-011-0100 0 0 1970 0
516 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-011-0060 ❑d ❑ 1926 ❑
520 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-011-0050 ❑ 0 1993 ❑
520 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-011-0080 ❑ 0 1955 0
525 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-011-0070 0 0 1973 0
526 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-011-0030 ❑ 0 1970 0
528 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-011-0020 0 ❑ 1925 ❑
532 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-006-0130 0 ❑ 1950 0
Wednesday,August 11,2004 Page 8 of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-Contributing Date of Construction FM4F
533 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-001-0150 0 0 1957 ❑
575 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-30-000-0020 0 0 1995 0
585 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-30-000-0010 0 0 1999 0
6 NW 11 Street 12-43-46-08-36-000-0010 0 0 2000 0
602 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-007-0070 0 0 1972 0
603 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-005-0050 0 0 1956 0
608 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-005-0030 ❑ 0 1959 ❑
609 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-010-0080 0 0 1950 0
701 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-002-0200 0 0 1956 0
702 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-010-0100 0 ❑ 1925 ❑
704 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-010-0070 0 ❑ 1928 ❑
704 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-010-0070 0 ❑ 1928 ❑
710 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-010-0060 0 ❑ 1937 ❑
710 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-010-0060 0 ❑ 1937 ❑
710 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-002-0060 0 0 1976 0
715 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-002-0181 0 ❑ 1950 ❑
801 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-002-0170 0 0 1950 0
k.o Wednesday,
mAx ugu...st Ia I,.204
Page 9 of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-Contributing Date of Construction FMSF
802 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-010-0050 0 ❑ 1940 ❑
802 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-002-0080 0 0 1925 0
810 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-010-0010 0 ❑ 1925 ❑
811 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-010-0030 0 0 1950 0
817 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-002-0140 0 0 1939 0
834 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-15-002-0110 0 0 1956 ❑
9 NW 17 Street 12-43-46-08-12-002-0131 0 ❑ 1954 0
902 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-009-0270 0 ❑ 1947 ❑
904 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-009-0240 0 ❑ 1950 ❑
904 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-05-000-0150 0 0 1996 0
905 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-009-0250 ❑ 0 1974 0
910 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-08-21-009-0230 0 ❑ 1928 ❑
919 NW 2 Avenue 12-43-46-08-05-000-0070 0 0 1955 0
920 NW 1 Avenue 12-43-46-08-05-000-0160 0 0 1961 0
CONFIDENTIAL 12-43-46-08-21-009-0130 ❑ 0 1969 ❑
VACANT 12-43-46-08-21-012-0020 0 0 0 0
VACANT 12-43-46-08-40-000-0030 0 0 0 0
Wednesday,August 11,2004 Page 10 of 11
•
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-Contributing Date gfConstruction FMSF
VACANT 12-43-46-08-40-000-0020 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Wednesday,August 11,264 Page 11 of 11
PEIRAY BCACH Oki-RAY BEACH
i HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT liii
199 3 Rim
Project Name: Dell Park Historic District
Historic designation report for a historic district
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The action requested of the Board is to review the designation report for the Dell
Park Historic District and to set a date for the public hearing, pursuant to LDR
Section 4.5.1(C).
.:.BACK,GR_OUND
The City of Delray Beach has proposed to designate the area discussed in the
attached designation report to the Local Register of Historic Places. To qualify as
a historic site or historic district, the property or properties must fulfill one or more
of the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(2) and/or (3). The designation
report contains, at a minimum, sufficient information to conform to the criteria
stated in LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3), a district is deemed to have architectural or
aesthetic significance if it fulfills one or more of the following criteria:
(a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or
more distinctive architectural styles; and,
(b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style,
period, or method of construction;
(c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer,
landscape architect, or builder; or
(d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of
outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant
innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment.
To qualify as a historic site, or historic district, or historic interior, individual
properties, structures, sites, or buildings, or groups of properties, structures,
sites, or buildings must have significant character, interest, or value as part of the
historical, cultural, aesthetic, and architectural heritage of the city, state, or
nation.
The designation report demonstrates that the area qualifies as a historic district
as the area: (a) portrays high styles and local interpretations of distinctive
Meeting Date: August 18, 2004
Agenda Item: V.B.
HPB Staff Report
Dell Park Designation Report-
Page 2
architectural styles and (b) embodies distinctive characteristics typical of those
styles and period of construction. Designating the district as historic will help
preserve the character of the extant historic dwellings and promote the retention
of the scale of the neighborhood.
RECOMMENDATION,
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C)(4), Designation Procedures, after formally
reviewing the designation report, set a date for the required public hearing for the
HPB meeting of September 15, 2004.
Attachment:Dell Park Historic District Designation Report
Dell Park Historic District
Designation Report
City of Delray Beach
August 18, 2004
I. Statement of Purpose
Dell Park Historic District
The proposal to establish the Dell Park Neighborhood as a designated historic
district was city initiated and began in June 2004 as a direct result of the
recommendations noted in the Seacrest-Del-Ida Neighborhood Plan dated March
3, 1998. The boundaries were chosen based upon the plat boundaries
established for Dell Park in 1922. The district was chosen for designation based
upon its high architectural integrity and diversity of architectural styles as well as
its contiguous expanse of extant contributing historic buildings and structures. .
II. Location Map & Boundary Description
The proposed Dell Park Historic District encompasses the east side of North
Swinton Avenue to the west and NE 3`d Avenue to the east; the north side of NE
8th Street to the south and the north side of NE 13th Street to the north (see
attached map).
•11111111111111111 II
HEATHER LANE li Q
� Li
Z, N.E. 14TH ST. (LAKE AVE.)
N. E. 14TH ST.
HIGHLAND LN. 7 I
>—
•'�— I 3
1959
,y 195 rh9▪ TD, 1955 R > .6 1%0 1957=f ti 1963- f3 19661962 9956 1961 1960 1961 1959
rxrr Q ' �`rr`rrr 1965 1 96 5 ► ' 2'
13 _u5j0.9- / 209__71 f 219_i 233 235 241 247 251 257 .1 265 289 273
N.E. 13TH ST. I
Ol 01 201 901, 0 LL1 9Ll 912 OLL isT,JrJ'OCL 9fL LtZ 9fL OSt 9SZ 09i 29L 09L L(L I ' •
1965 1956 1999 1956 1 1959 1966
1 ;SI 1998 1956 J,192 1958 1956 P9H(1110 1956 1953 1962 1966 1965 1966 1966 R
LOT
TH ST. 1 �'} Q '
��'' Jrr r ��`
���JJJ 1959 8 I I-Ai
92���___���195619' 19'9- 1959 192 %7.7 1%7 u 1966 1971 1958 1969 h 1958 1962 1953 1959 1953 1953 (9' J 1952 X
f : r 1972 l ' t �� 265 ► 'tl 1'1� tOl 111 95 119 ID 209122u Hz1] zn zn vs zn z.1 2ts 299 55 26J 26s
•
,e7 JI'N.E. 1J .Il LCITrriyir J 0lZ .YL'YLL/ LZL f f{. Inc L92 *sr I 1
1952 ,996 -m 9956 jC 1953 950 1%9 19 1915 1965 1965 u ►
Aro wxr
LZ U o1' j, 5 1981 0 ► I O
9 056 1957 9956 1959 192J.19601959 195J Q . lf• �9JQ 1976 1958 1971 1958 1953 1986 1951 1962 1963 1963 I -
r1�rJr' L1.1 196J 1991
1/"�, 15 21 101 105 -11,3 n7 121 125 co 201 209,211 217 221 225 237 241 2.5 249 253 257 1107 1
N.E. 11TH ST. I
•
L��1 Jrr II ZOl 90l 91 U r9 13 000 J 19*Z LLL 92Z OCZ�Jf(J2r 11Ct fJ Yl"umr:95 1 err f9L -
r l r r f -. J� J.l 1951
195] 195] �9 �2 1971 -19f 1954 1954 1960 19601 1953 ♦ T1 -198J -
.-+rr •r J-1�J1'- VACANT u 0
• r S
1959 u r i.r)
_ r f f
J$ r1991) I9J6 ^ 19761994 1994 1951 196J 1955 1965 ,
JJrj-r Jx �1 967 rr
1 C 19,r ,.7 1M1 113 119 125 .t 213 217 2.225 -fr r 237 245 253
N.E. 0 10TH ST. I I
01 J l C1L f12�0I9 ort SLt V[Y RL ZK 9fZ OSL 9SL I
- JJJr-
I VACANT
u 1951 193E 1 t i9b' 1966 19J1 „ N 1955 1957/1 1 2 19301979 1979 1f3]1957 1952 1
Jr 92
u 195) 9956 195J 962 196019M 1%1 191) 1962 192 195619JaS j✓)9956 v6CNfT 8iI
YnCl.,„ 213 2JJ 21a jj]4 2f9 I —
� J / til 6W f1t a1i r23I OCZ aCt on ZfZ rq,Yf ► I
ei. 9J t9JOfl 1939I 9956 VA0'WT JrrJr1T�'r r('Y
AMIMI
L Jll_ f 1923 1%1 931 1954 1954 1953 1960 -
ii/
pti
{}J -1-. W o 19]t rL�J 12 W ft/ irrej1-1rrrr
•
�1191950 J z r rc
1975 1f]9 197f 1%6 MIMI
• r�.(�r1('' ...JJJ rff 3 1933 �,1�rJr Z
8TH ST. "` I,7 T 7 r y �OQSr :17 229 237 :55 :75 JI -
16 — — M.GEORGE go — — - - 1" BUSH BOULEVARD.
W - G,-
D
Z P\� O
Q N.E. 7TH ST. • �p
W. 9TH ST.
iiiii
w
Q
nl r -]T11
N HISTORIC DEL PARK
�� LEGEND:
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL
3 0 ix/ - - - - -
PLANNING& ZONING DEPARTMENT BLOCK NUMBER CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC BOUNDARY
-- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LMAT72
Ill. Architectural Significance
The period of significance for the area is between 1922 and 1950 based upon
recordation of the Dell Park plat. Predominant architectural styles include Mission
Revival, Masonry Vernacular, Minimal Traditional, Frame Vernacular, and
Mediterranean-Revival. The following is a brief description of those styles:
Frame Vernacular - Constructed of wood
`I ®® r` framing and reflecting no high architectural style
or formal architectural design, the vernacular
house can be either symmetrical or
�� 111-1-11111irill11" asymmetrical in design. Built by laymen, often
IMAMSi_ lllill.11 '+ill the owner, with(__��_ no formal construction
' I" experience who utilized local building materials
and craftsmanship techniques (also Masonry Vernacular).
Mission Revival - Minimally ornamented with
built-up, flat roofs often with stepped or
-� curvilinear parapets, a wood or hollow clay tile
_._ frame with smooth or rough textured stucco
1 exterior. Tile visor roofs over windows and
f :` entryways are also common. Fenestration often
includes casement windows and arched
entryways.
Mediterranean Revival (1915-1940) -
Influenced by the Italian and Spanish -*f ► �� .: .
styles and popularized by Henry
Flagler and Addison Mizner, this style • ' c
displays low pitched, multi-plane roof , 999
lines often with red clay tiles and little l
d
or no overhang. Tile visor roofs are �� ti.... -� i
also common. A stucco exterior, often J ��-
textured, covers an asymmetrical,
wood or hollow clay tile frame. Arches
are prevalent within the fenestration design including entryways, arcades, and
colonnades.
:7 Minimal Traditional
..4 (1935-1950) T icall
— Yp Y�
„dais : J a one-story building displaying a low or
�'; 01,) i intermediate pitched gable roof with a large
In
, ;l _ chimney. Shares Tudor style traits such as
Pa 8 81 ' rock or brick facing (particularly on the
'
'�il
�� chimney) and minimal wood detailing.
MD ® Popularized after World War II, this style is
often associated with tract housing.
IV. Historical & Cultural Significance
The Dell Park plat was recorded in January 1922, submitted by Boyd Hawkins,
President and General Manger of the Floridixi Farms Company as part of the 70
acres associated with the Seacrest neighborhood. Dell Park was platted in lots
ranging from 24' to 65.5' wide; though the majority were platted at 50' wide lots.
The area was originally a pineapple farm. As agriculture made way for the
development boom of the 1920s, it is speculated that the land was available for
purchase and development of single family homes. This is reflective of the mid-
1920s Mission-Revival and Mediterranean influenced homes that can be seen
today. According to the Seacrest Neighborhood Plan, only one home was
constructed in 1922 but by the end of the decade, 45 homes were constructed
throughout the Dell Park subdivision. The plat assigned street names influenced
by western U.S. cities that included: Phoenix Path (NE 8 Street), Seattle Street
(NE 9 Street), Santa-Fe Trail (NE 10 Street), Denver Drive (NE 11 Street), Salt
Lake Way (NE 12 Street), Cheyenne Road (NE 13 Street), Boise Boulevard (NE
2 Avenue) and Sacramento Pass (NE 3 Avenue). At the time the plat was
recorded, NE 2 Avenue, also known today as Seacrest Boulevard, ended at NE
13th Street with only pine scrub beyond and did not expand further north towards
Boynton Beach until after World War II. One of the first houses in Dell Park was
constructed on NE 9th Street east of NE 2"d Avenue according to an oral
interview of Margaret Manning (who originally owned 222 NE 9th Street),
conducted by Dorothy Patterson, city archivist. The streets were lined with
Coconut Palms at that time and NE 2nd Avenue was only a shell rock road.
One prominent local family who settled in the area at this time was the O'Neal
family who resided in Delray Beach since c. 1918. Samuel Elliot (S. E.) O'Neal
was the eldest of four brothers who moved to Delray Beach from Fairfax County,
South Carolina. The O'Neal brothers were produce farmers west of Delray for a
number of years and gradually moved to town as the farm prospered.
S. E. O'Neal married Shirley Bradley in 1921. They purchased 910 N. E. 2"d
Avenue from Herbert Harrington on May 21, 1930. S. E. and Shirley O'Neal had
one son, Bradley O'Neal. Bradley was the first Delray Beach resident to die in
the armed forces in World War II. The local VFW Post is named in his honor who
was killed during the Italian campaign in 1942. Bradley bequeathed one-half of
his serviceman's life insurance policy, in the amount of $5,000, to the Delray
Beach School Library. T. M. O'Neal, the next eldest brother, was listed in the
1920 Palm Beach County directory as a garage owner in the town of Delray
Beach. He later entered the insurance business and maintained an office above
Huber's Drugstore, a city landmark. T. M. O'Neal was elected to the Delray
Beach City Council for a two year term starting in 1925. He later became a Palm
Beach County Commissioner. Fred A. O'Neal became a lawyer. The Delray
Beach Historical Society has a file of stock certificates and patents indicating he
invested in several local businesses (Frysinger-Brigante).
The area developed slowly but steadily in the 1930s with the transition from more
detailed Mediterranean inspired homes to Frame Vernacular and Masonry
Vernacular dwellings. Clapboard clad houses with cross gable and hip roof are
still prevalent between North Swinton Avenue and NE 2 Avenue. Most of the
houses were constructed with rear cottages which served as temporary housing
while the larger, main dwellings were being constructed. These cottages later
served as rental housing for servicemen during World War II.
Post World War II, the area experienced a construction boom in order to
accommodate returning GIs. Masonry Vernacular and Minimal Traditional style
construction prospered with more readily available manufactured materials and
labor. According to Sandy Simon, Delray Beach historian, low cost housing was
prevalent in this area and as construction expanded so too did the area's
residential neighborhoods to the north towards the Delray-Boynton border. Local
directories from 1953 clearly show both permanent residents and tourists in this
area who rented the houses seasonally.
The majority of the remainder of the neighborhood's building stock was
constructed during the 1950s and 1960s and is considered non-contributing due
to either age or lack of architectural integrity.
V. Statement of Significance
Pursuant to the LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3), a district is deemed to have
architectural or aesthetic significance if it fulfills one or more of the following
criteria:
(a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or
more distinctive architectural styles; and,
(b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style,
period, or method of construction;
(c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer,
landscape architect, or builder; or
(d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of
outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant
innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment.
To qualify as a historic site, or historic district, or historic interior, individual
properties, structures, sites, or buildings, or groups of properties, structures,
sites, or buildings must have significant character, interest, or value as part of the
historical, cultural, aesthetic, and architectural heritage of the city, state, or
nation.
The area qualifies as a historic district under the following criterion: (a) portrays
high styles and local interpretations of distinctive architectural styles and (b)
embodies distinctive characteristics typical of those styles and period of
construction. A significant concentration of the Mission Revival, Frame
Vernacular, Masonry Vernacular, Mediterranean-Revival, and Minimal Traditional
styles of architecture are prevalent within the proposed boundaries and the
contributing status of these building is considerable as the majority of the
buildings have maintained their architectural integrity.
VI. Bibliography and Sources
Delray Beach Surveys - Florida Master Site File Forms, 1999 & 2001
Dell Park Plat, January 1922
Sandy Simon, Delray Beach Historian, Phone Interview conducted with Wendy
Shay, Delray Beach Preservation Planner, June 2004
Delray Beach Historical Society, Oral Interview with Margaret Manning (222 NE
9th Street), conducted by Dorothy Patterson, 1990.
Miller's Delray Beach, Florida City Directory, Volume Ill., 1953-1954.
Delray Beach Individually Listed Designation Report for 910 NE 2"d Avenue,
prepared by Jack Frysinger and Starr Deppe-Brigante, 2002.
Seacrest/Del-Ida Park Neighborhood Plan, City of Delray Beach/Delray Beach
Community Redevelopment Agency, adopted March 3, 1998.
Dell Park Survey
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-contrbuting Date of Construction FMSF
106 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0071 0 0 1949 0
114 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0051 ❑ 0 1952 0
132 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0040 0 0 1998 ❑
1110 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-006-0010 0 0 1930 0
24 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0100 0 ❑ 1948 0
18 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0110 0 0 1930 0
14 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0120 0 0 1930 0
1101 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-006-0180 0 ❑ 1936 0
15 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0240 0 0 1956 0
21 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0251 ❑ 0 1957 0
101 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0270 ❑ 0 1958 0
105 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0280 0 0 1956 0
113 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0300 0 0 1930 0
117 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0310 0 0 1960 11
121 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0320 0 0 1958 0
125 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-006-0331 0 0 1953 0
1106 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-006-0030 0 0 1930 0
1109 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-005-0200 0 0 1949 0
210 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0190 ❑ 0 1956 0
214 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0180 0 0 1948 0
Wednesday,August 11,2004
Page 1 of ll
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-contrbuting Date of Construction FMSF
218 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0170 0 0 1948 0
222 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0151 0 0 1953 0
230 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0140 0 0 1949 0
234 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0120 0 0 1950 0
248 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0100 ❑ 0 1969 0
250 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0090 0 0 1930 0
254 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0070 0 0 1947 0
262/264 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0060 0 0 1965 0
VACANT 12-43-46-09-28-005-0011 ❑ 0 VACANT ❑
1106 NE 3 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-005-0370 0 0 1981 0
1102 NE 3 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-005-0391 0 0 1981 0
257 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0360 0 0 1963 0
253 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0350 0 0 1963 0
249 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0340 0 0 1962 0
245 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0330 0 0 1951 0
241 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0320 0 0 1988 0
237 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0290 0 0 1953 ❑
225 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0280 0 0 1958 ❑
221 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0270 0 0 1971 0
217 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0260 0 0 1958 0
211 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0250 0 0 1976 0
209 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0240 0 0 1948 0
1105 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-005-0222 0 0 1948 ❑
Wednesday,August11,2004 .� _.� ....... .�.,.._�,,...,,_.,�...A ,,- .. .�..�. ,...».. .,.�.�..� a.��..,�.,._..».�s.�a....... ...._..,,�...��...,._ .� _.� ��_..�. �.�_�_� Page 2of11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-contrbuting Date of Construction FMSF
201 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-005-0221 ❑ 0 1983 ❑
1215 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-004-0172 0 ❑ 1948 0
1211 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-004-0171 0 ❑ 1933 0
214 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0151 ❑ 0 1998 ❑
220 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0141 ❑ 0 1958 ❑
226 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0130 0 ❑ 1925 0
230 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0120 ❑ 0 1958 ❑
236 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0110 ❑ 0 1958 ❑
242 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0090 ❑ 0 PARKING LOT ❑
246 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0080 ❑ 0 1958 ❑
250 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0070 ❑ 0 1958 ❑
256 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0060 ❑ 0 1962 ❑
260 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0051 ❑ 0 1966 ❑
262 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0011 ❑ 0 1965 ❑
268 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0012 ❑ 0 1966 ❑
272 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0013 ❑ 0 1966 ❑
1206 NE 3 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-004-0360 ❑ 0 1959 ❑
265 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0380 ❑ d❑ 1982 ❑
263 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0341 ❑ 0 1952 ❑
255 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0330 0 ❑ 1931 0
249 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0320 ❑ 0 1953 ❑
245 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0310 ❑ 0 1953 ❑
241 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0300 ❑ 0 1959 ❑
Wednesday,August 11,2004 .<.. .,.. K.
Page3of11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-contrbuting Date of Construction FMSF
237 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0290 ❑ 0 1963 ❑
233 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0270 ❑ 0 1962 ❑
227 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0260 ❑ 0 1958 ❑
223 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0250 ❑ 0 PARKING LOT ❑
217 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0240 ❑ 0 1969 ❑
213 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0230 ❑ 0 1958 ❑
209 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-004-0220 ❑ 0 1971 ❑
1205 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-004-0200 ❑ 0 1968 ❑
1202 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-003-0290 ❑ 0 1972 ❑
1206 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-003-0030 0 ❑ 1935 0
126 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0010 ❑ 0 1968 ❑
123 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0270 ❑ 0 1967 ❑
119 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0260 ❑ 0 1967 ❑
115 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0250 ❑ 0 1966 ❑
111 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0231 0 ❑ 1925 ❑
103 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0221 ❑ 0 1959 ❑
21 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0210 0 ❑ 1931 ❑
17 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0200 0 ❑ 1939 0
13 NE 12 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0181 ❑ 0 1958 ❑
1201 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-003-0131 0 ❑ 1925 ❑
122 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0040 ❑ 0 1959 ❑
118 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0050 0 ❑ 1931 0
106 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0070 0 ❑ 1931 0
Wednesday,August 11,2004 Page 4 of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-contrbuting Date of Construction FMSF
102 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0090 0 d❑ 1956 111
18 NE 13 Street . 12-43-46-09-28-003-0101 ❑ d❑ 1988 ❑
10 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-003-0121 ❑ 0 1958 0
1275 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-003-0141 ❑ 0 1965 ❑
1101 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-007-0130 0 ❑ 1948 ❑
10 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0110 0 ❑ 1947 0
22 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0100 ❑d ❑ 1930 ❑d
102 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0090 0 ❑ 1935 0
106 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0080 0 0 1957 0
114 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0060 11 0 1957 0
118 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0040 d❑ ❑ 1949 ❑d
1018 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-007-0010 0 0 1935 0
1021 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-007-0021 Cl El 1959 0
125 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0330 ❑ 0 1967 0
119 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0310 0 0 1934 0
115 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0300 ❑d ❑ 1949 0
107 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0280 ❑ 0 1991 0
25 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0260 0 Li 1949 0
19 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-007-0240 0 ❑ 1935 10
1001 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-007-0200 0 ❑ 1948 0
230 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0120 ❑ 0 1960 0
214 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0160 0 0 1949 0
218 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0150 ❑ II 1954 0
Wednesday,August II,2004
Page 5 of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-contrbuting Date of Construction FMSF
202 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0170 0 0 1971 0
222 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0140 0 0 1954 0
226 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0130 0 0 1960 0
234 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0101 0 ❑ 1949 0
238 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0090 0 0 1953 0
246 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0071 0 0 1948 0
256 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0060 0 0 1948 0
258 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0050 0 0 1983 0
264 NE 11 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0010 0 0 1951 0
1012 NE 3 Avenue-VACAN 12-43-46-09-28-008-0030 ❑ 0 VACANT ❑
255 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0330 0 0 1965 0
245 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0310 0 0 1955 0
237 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0290 0 0 1963 ❑
235 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0270 0 0 1950 0
225 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0260 0 0 1951 0
221 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0250 0 ❑ 1947 0
217 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0240 0 0 1994 0
213 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0230 0 0 1994 0
209 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0220 0 0 1947 0
203 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-008-0210 0 ❑ 1947 0
1001 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-008-0200 ❑ 0 1976 0
204 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0150 0 0 1922 0
210 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0140 0 0 1955 0
Wednesday,August II,2004 .,�__...�.,,.....Page 6 of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-contrbuting Date of Construction FMSF
214 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0130 0 0 1957 ❑
218 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0120 0 ❑ 1945 0
220 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0110 ❑d ❑ 1938 ❑d
226 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0100 d❑ 0 1929 ❑
230 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0090 d❑ 0 1922 0
234 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0080 El 11 1930 ❑
238 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0070 Li 1979 0
242 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0060 0 0 1979 0
246 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0050 ❑ El 1957 0
250 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0040 ❑ 0 1957 ❑
256 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0020 ❑ 0 1952 0
VACANT 12-43-46-09-28-009-0010 ❑ El VACANT ❑
910 NE 3 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-009-0300 ❑ ❑d 1963 ❑
906 NE 3 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-009-0310 ❑ 0 VACANT ❑
275 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0320 ❑ ❑�/ 1981 ❑
249 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0290 ❑ ❑d 1958 ❑
245 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0280 El ❑ 1940 ❑d
239 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0260 ❑ 0 1958 0
214 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0270 ❑d ❑ 1930 ❑
233 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0250 ❑ ❑�/ 1958 ❑
229 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0240 �/❑ 0 1938 0
221 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0211 0 0 1940 0
213 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0201 ❑ 0 1962 0
Wednesday,August 11,2004 page?'aril
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-contrbuting Date of Construction FMSF
211 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-009-0190 ❑ 0 1953 0
903 NE 2 Avenue •12-43-46-09-28-009-0170 0 0 1961 0
118 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0040 0 0 1986 0
114 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0050 0 0 1938 0
110 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0070 0 ❑ 1939 0
102 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0081 0 0 1948 0
26 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0091 0 0 1948 0
20 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0110 0 0 1948 0
10 NE 10 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0130 0 0 1958 0
915 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-010-0140 ❑ 0 1951 ❑
905 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-010-0160 ❑ 0 1957 ❑
7 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0180 0 0 1956 0
17 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0191 ❑ ❑d 1953 ❑
21 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0210 0 ❑ 1930 0
109 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0240 0 0 1962 0
117 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0260 0 0 1980 ❑
121 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-010-0271 ❑ 0 1979 ❑
806 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-011-0030 0 ❑ 1928 0
VACANT 12-43-46-09-28-011-0010 ❑ 0 VACANT ❑
122 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0040 0 0 1958 ❑
114 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0051 0 0 1948 0
106 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0070 0 0 1930 0
28 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0090 0 ❑ 1948 0
Wednesday,August 11,2004 Page 8 of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-contrbuting Date of Construction FMSF
18 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0101 0 0 1930 0
14 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0120 0 0 1948 0
805 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-011-0131 0 ❑ 1948 0
803 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-011-0161 0 ❑ 1934 0
801 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-011-0162 0 ❑ 1934 0
5 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0180 0 0 1930 0
17 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0200 0 ❑ 1951 0
25 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0210 0 0 1946 0
105 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0230 0 0 1988 0
109 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0240 0 0 1930 0
113 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0250 0 0 1949 0
117 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0260 0 ❑ 1954 0
121 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-011-0270 0 ❑ 1947 0
910 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-79-000-0020 0 0 1931 0
906 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-79-000-0010 ❑ 0 2004 0
910 NE 2 Avenue-VACAN 12-43-46-09-79-000-0030 ❑ 0 VACANT ❑
899 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-012-0140 ❑ 0 0 ❑
214 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0130 0 0 0 0
218 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0120 0 0 1964 0
222 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0100 0 0 1931 0
230 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0090 0 0 1953 0
236 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0080 0 0 1954 0
240 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0070 0 0 1954 0
Wednesday,August 11,2004 Page 9 of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-contrbuting Date of Construction FMSF
242 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0060 ❑ 0 1953 0
246 NE 9 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0040 0 0 1950 0
275 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0010 ❑ 0 1980 0
255 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0271 ❑ d❑ 1966 ❑
237 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0250 ❑ 0 1979 0
229 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0230 ❑ 0 1974 0
217 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0201 0 0 1975 ❑
205 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0190 0 0 1970 0
801 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-012-0171 ❑ 0 1974 0
201 NE 8 Street 12-43-46-09-28-012-0172 0 0 1963 0
1115 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-67-000-0010 0 ❑ 1936 0
1301 North Swinton Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-002-0111 0 ❑ 1937 0
13 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-002-0090 ❑ ❑d 1957 ❑
135 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-002-0080 0 0 1931 0
109 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-002-0070 0 0 1931 0
1300 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-002-0010 0 0 1955 0
1303 NE 2 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-001-0190 0 0 1960 0
209 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0180 ❑ 0 1957 0
215 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0160 0 0 1950 0
219 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0150 0 0 1968 0
225 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0140 0 0 1950 0
233 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0120 0 0 1964 ❑
235 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0110 0 0 1966 0
Wednesday,August 11,2004 Page To of 11
Address Parcel Control Number Contributing Non-contrbuting Date of Construction FMSF
241 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0100 0 EI 1982 ❑
247 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0081 0 0 1958 0
251 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0071 El 1961 0
257 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0061 ❑ 0 1960 0
261 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0051 0 ❑d 1961 0
265 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0040 ❑ 0 1959 ❑
269 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0021 ❑ 0 1965 ❑
273 NE 13 Street 12-43-46-09-28-001-0022 ❑ 0 1965 0
1310 NE 3 Avenue 12-43-46-09-28-001-0010 ❑ J❑ 1959 0
Wednesday,August II,2004 Page 11 of 11