The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB- 12-17-03 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2003 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Mary Lou Jamison, John Miller, Jr., James Keavney and Jeffrey Silberstein MEMBERS ABSENT: Randee Schatz, Rhonda Sexton STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:05 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. International Materials, 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Everett Jennet, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements, Internal Adjustment, and Waiver for the conversion of a non-contributing duplex to an office. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board and entered a copy of the project file and her resume into the record. Based on the submittal the Board had some concerns regarding the landscaping toward the rear of the building. Mr. Everett Jenner, authorized agent/applicant was present and stated that the plan shows the curbing addressing staffs concerns. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. Historic Preservation Board Meeting December 17,2003 The Board discussed the landscaping in the back of the building, as well as the • shutters. Mr. Jenner advised that the shutters would be the same in the front of the building as well as the sides. Waiver It was moved by Mr. Keavney, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5 to 0 to approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), to reduce the landscape strip on the west, north, and south property lines, adjacent to the parking area, from the required 5' to 4', based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B) Internal Adjustment It was moved by Mr. Keavney, seconded by Ms. Jamison, and passed 5 to 0 to approve the internal adjustment to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(4)(d), to reduce the one-way drive aisle along the west property line from the required 12' width to 11', based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(C). Site Plan It was moved by Mr. Keavney, seconded by Ms. Jamison, and passed 5 to 0 to approve the COA for the Class V site plan for 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report; and, 2) That a photometric plan is provided. Landscape Plan It was moved by Mr. Keavney, seconded by Ms. Jamison, and passed 5 to 0 to approve the COA for the landscape plan for 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff rep-0 t; and, 2) That a terminal landscape island be provided along with protective curbing at the southwest corner of the parking area. Design Elements It was moved by Mr. Keavney, seconded by Ms. Jamison, and passed 5 to 0 to approve the COA for the design elements for 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), (E)(8)(c), (d), and (g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes December 17,2003 B. Brisa Atlantica, 9 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Israel Torres, Owner Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of vinyl awnings, relocation of the A/C units, and an exterior color change for a contributing property. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Ms. Shay presented the project to the Board and entered the project file into the record. Mr. Israel Torres, owner, was present to represent the project. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any questions from the public. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. There were none. It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Keavney, and passed 5 to 0 to approve the COA and associated Class I site plan modification for 9 SE 7th Avenue, Brisa Atlantica, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. C. 325 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Stofft Architects, Inc., Authorized Agent Item before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a non-contributing building and the construction of a single-family home. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Ms. Shay presented the project to the Board and entered the project file into the record. Mr. Craig Valvo, Island Homes presented elevations of the pool, as well as the proposed home that depicts what changes would be incorporated into the plans. Chairman Perez inquired if there were any questions from the public. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board The Board recommended that additional architectural elements be incorporated into the side and rear elevations, such as banding, arched windows, and door 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes December 17,2003 surrounds. The pool needs to be set back, and the applicant must provide a true color palette Demolition It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Keavney, and passed 5 to 0 to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the non- contributing dwelling at 325 SE 7`h Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F), and it is approved administratively when the changes come in. Certificate of Appropriateness It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and passed 4-1 (Jamison dissenting) to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for 325 SE 7th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR' Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), 4.6.15(G), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That additional architectural elements be incorporated into the side and rear elevations, specifically including but not limited to: banding, arched windows and door surrounds, and variation of the exterior; 2) That the south end of the proposed pool be relocated to comply with the required minimum ten foot (10') side setback; and, 3) That the applicant submit a true color scheme. 4) That additional landscaping be added facing the intercoastal. D. Blue Anchor, 802 East Atlantic Avenue, Marina Historic District, American Awning, Authorized Agent Item Before the Board: Reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of an awning. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Ms. Shay presented the project to the Board and entered the project file into the record. Mr. Joseph Mattei of American Awning submitted royal blue canvas material to the Board for review. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. There were none. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Miller, and passed 5 to 0 to approve the COA associated with the Class I site plan modification for the installation of a canvass awning for 802 East Atlantic Avenue, Blue Anchor, 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes December 17,2003 • based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the awning does not encroach more than one foot (1') into the Palm Square right-of-way (6'from the building). 2) That prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant enter into a Hold Harmless Agreement with the City. 3) That Royal Blue canvas material be utilized and all framing is painted to match. E. Old School Square Bread Company, 814 East Atlantic Avenue, Marina Historic District, Delray Awning, Authorized Agent Item before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of an awning. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Ms. Shay presented the project to the Board and entered the project file into the record. Staff is recommending re-designing the awning to accommodate the existing landscaping at the patio. The owner was notified that if the company occupies 816 East Atlantic Avenue, additional parking will be required. Staffs concern is that the planter area can be covered and the square footage increased resulting in the additional need for parking. Mr. Donald Day, Delray Awning, stated that the awning was re-designed to cut around the planter. The posts will be painted to match the building, and the upper portion of the structure will be painted to blend with the canvas awning. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. Mr. Silberstein inquired about exterior lighting. Mr. Day advised that there would more than likely be fans and lighting under the awning. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Jamison, and passed 5 -0 to approve the COA associated with the Class I -site plan modification for the installation of an awning at 814 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Bread Company, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following condition: 1) That the awning be re-designed as a gable in order to ell from the front door out to the patio area without covering the existing landscape strip adjacent to (east of) the building. 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes December 17,2003 III. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: None. B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: Ms. Jamison expressed her concern that a resident on George Bush Boulevard installed wrought iron gates without approval. George Bush is a collector road and the gates do not open automatically. Therefore, they will be blocking the driveway. Ms. Shay stated that she would look into this. D. Staff Comments: Ms. Shay requested that a Board member attend the West Settlers Advisory Board meeting on the fourth Monday of each month. Several Board members expressed interest. IV. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 7:45 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for December 17, 2003, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on March 3, 2004. Denise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes December 17,2003 • .: AGENDA . _ HISTORIC PRESERVATION x BOARD MEETING (4r�r CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: December 17, 2003 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. International Materials, 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Everett Jenner, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements, Internal Adjustment, and Waiver for the conversion of a non-contributing duplex to an office. B. Brisa Atlantica, 9 SE 7 Avenue, Marina Historic District, Israel Torres, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of vinyl awnings, relocation of the A/C units, and an exterior color change for a contributing property. C. 325 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Stofft Architects, Inc., Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a non-contributing building and the construction of a single family home. D. Blue Anchor, 802 East Atlantic Avenue, Marina Historic District, American Awning, Authorized Agent. Reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of an awning. E. Old School Square Bread Company, 814 East Atlantic Avenue, Marina Historic District, Delray Awning, Authorized Agent. F. December 17,2003 HPB Meeting Page 2 - Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of an awning. III. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff IV. ADJOURN 01\4 Wendy Shay, His ric Presery ion Planner POSTED ON: December 11,2003 Dcuw;o A I DEDNYOUCH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD �� MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT iIII 1993 Agent: Randall Stofft Architects Project Name: 325 SE 7th Avenue Residence Project Location: 325 SE 7th Avenue . . ITEM,_.B E,F O RE.x T:H E. ._BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition of a one-story, non-contributing building and construction of a new two-story residence at 325 SE 7th Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot II, a replat of Reikse. Located on the east side of SE 7th Avenue, adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway, the property is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential) and presently contains a 3,370 sq. ft., one-story, frame dwelling constructed in 1938. The property is considered non-contributing within the Marina Historic District, based on many significant elevation alterations and building material changes throughout the years. There are no recent administrative or Board actions related to this property. The following is a brief overview of previous COA requests regarding this property: On November 14, 1990, the Board reviewed a demolition request of the house. The Board supported the demolition with the condition that the owner research the feasibility of relocation. The applicant/owner later sold the house and the new owner, Mr. Kolleda modified the building's footprint through several additions. On April 3, 1991, the Board reviewed and approved a variance request to reduce the side setback from 10' to 7.35' to permit the existing historic building to remain in situ. During its meeting of August 21, 1991, the Board reviewed and approved the construction of a new single family residence. The work was never initiated and no permits were issued for new construction. During its meeting of February 19, 1992, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and approved an addition on the southeast corner of the original house to be used as a new bedroom. The addition was completed. Meeting Date: December 17,2003 Agenda Item:III.D. 325 SE 7th Avenue COA 2004-070 / Marina Historic District Page 2 On February 2, 1994, the Board reviewed and approved the demolition of a 176 sq. ft. storage room on the west (front) façade to be replaced with a garage. The work was completed and a garage was constructed. The Board continued the COA request on May 6, 1998, for the construction of a roofed patio at the southwest corner of the dwelling, alteration to the roof, and extension of the existing ell on the southwest corner. A variance request to reduce the side (south) setback from 10' to 7.5' associated with the construction of the roofed patio was reviewed and approved on February 18, 1998. The project was initiated and completed. The applicant is now before the Board for the demolition of a one-story, non-contributing building and construction of a new two-story residence. PRO JECt DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes the following modifications to the property: ➢ Demolition of a 3,370 sq. ft. one-story residence; and, ➢ Construction of a 7,782 sq. ft. residence (5,991 sq. ft. under air) including two attached garages and terraces. New Construction The project consists of the construction of a 7,782 sq. ft. (5,991 sq. ft. under air) two- story, Mediterranean inspired residence. The concrete block dwelling contains a combination of smooth stucco and a rusticated stone exterior, multi-plane, barrel tile hip roof, and first and second story terraces with decorative columns, brackets, and railings. The building's asymmetrical facade displays a lofty tower, which rises above the plane of the second story roof, on the south end of the residence. A stone water table lines the base of the building while decorative railings encompass the front entrance. Fenestration consists of single, paired, and triplet impact resistant, casement windows (many with arched detailing and decorative columns and banding) and arched entrance doors, paired French doors, and garage doors with detailed stone surrounds. Fixed, louvered shutters and shutter dogs can also be found flanking several windows. The property has an extensive herringbone, Chicago brick driveway/courtyard located in the front of the building as well as the rear. The front driveway leads to two separate garages (that are attached to the dwelling); the rear courtyard extends to the proposed pool. Exterior lighting consists of single lanterns which flank both the main entrance and the single car garage on the front façade. Landscaping is also proposed. The applicant is also requesting consideration of a pool. The asymmetrical shaped pool measures 24.5' x 26.5' and is located at the southeast corner of the property. 325 SE 7th Avenue COA 2004-070 Marina Historic District _ Page 3 The applicant has not submitted a color scheme for the building though the use of white for the body and sage green for the louvered shutters is under consideration. The building has recently been primed for demolition and has suffered a dramatic loss of fabric as a result of salvaging. The work was halted due to notification that the property is within a historic district and that demolition and new construction requires Historic Preservation Board approval and building permits. ANALYSIS Design Elements LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non-contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) height, (b) front façade proportion, (c) proportion of openings (windows and doors), (d) rhythm of solids to voids: front facades, (e) rhythm of buildings on streets, (t) rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections, (g) consistency in relation to materials, texture, color, (h) roof shapes, (i) walls of continuity, Q) scale of a building, and (k) directional expression of a front elevation. The proposed new single family home reflects a complimentary design regarding the scale and massing with respect to its appearance from the right-of-way. The multi-plane 325 SE 7th Avenue COA 2004-070 Marina Historic District Page 4 roof line and variation of building materials reduce the impact of the two-story building while differentiating it from the historic properties in the district. Though the garages are proposed in front of the building, the designs of both entrances easily conceal their location and blend well with the front façade. While the new construction is appropriate in style, scale, and massing to the adjacent new construction along SE 7th Avenue and the Mediterranean influences can be seen in the historic architecture of the Marina Historic District, the building displays minimal architectural detailing on the side (north and south) elevations. Further, additional design elements should be added to the rear elevation as the property can be viewed from the Intracoastal Waterway. The addition of architectural elements to the rear and side elevations has been added as a condition of approval. As the applicant has only preliminarily chosen a color scheme for the property, submittal of a specific color scheme is also added as a condition of approval. Swimming Pool LDR Section 4.6.15 (G) Swimming Pool Yard Encroachment (G)(1) Swimming pools, the tops of which are no higher than grade level, may extend into the•rear or side setback area but no closer than ten feet (10) to any property line, except as provided in division 2 below. (G)(2) When adjacent to at least 50 feet of open space, as defined in Section 4.3.4(H)(5)(c) and (d), swimming pools at grade level may extend into the rear or side setback area but no closer than five feet (5). The proposed pool is set back five feet (5') from the rear setback and seven (7') from the side (south) setback. Pursuant to LDR Sections 4.6.15(G)(1) and (G)(2), a swimming pool may encroach into the rear setback no more than five feet (5) if the property is adjacent to at least 50' of open space. As the property lies adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway, the proposed pool may encroach into the rear setback five feet (5'). However, as the pool encroaches three feet (3') into the side (south) setback, the pool must be relocated outside of the side setback (minimum of 10') in order to be compliant with the Land Development Regulations Section 4.3.4(K) (Development Standards Matrix). This has been added as a condition of approval. DEMOLITION The 3,370 sq. ft. frame residence was constructed in 1938 and is considered non- contributing due to several significant alterations including the addition of a garage and an ell and the introduction of several alternate stucco exteriors, new roof, new windows and doors, and interior elements. The one-story building currently displays both a smooth stucco and clapboard exterior, an irregular floor plan, and gable, hip, and flat roof lines. Fenestration includes 6/6 single and double hung sash windows, some with 325 SE 7th Avenue COA 2004-070 Marina Historic District _ Page 5 fanlights, a bay window, and solid core and sliding glass doors, though many have recently been removed (see below). a ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1(F) "Restrictions on Demolitions" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness' for demolition. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill criteria for designation for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. The non-contributing dwelling is not eligible for individual listing in the Local Register or the National Register of Historic Places due to its lack of historical and architectural significance and the substantial alterations undertaken to the historic footprint and building materials in relation to the context of the surrounding historic district. Demolition of the existing, non-contributing house can be supported based on the building's lack of integrity through several significant additions and installation of new fenestration, new exterior, and new roof. Due to the factors presented in this report, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR 4.5.1 (F) regarding the demolition of the one-story, non- contributing dwelling. CONCLUSION The proposed new residence is significantly larger than the original building though it does compliment the traditional Mediterranean-Revival style buildings found within the area. The increase in square footage and lot coverage reflects the increasing trend in the neighborhood based on rising property values. Evidence of these larger houses can be seen on the adjacent lot to the south and on several lots to the north of this property 325 SE 7th Avenue COA 2004-070 Marina Historic District _ Page 6 on the east side of SE 7th Avenue. The proposed Mediterranean influenced style and the introduction of the rusticated stone exterior, multi-plane roof, and irregular floor plan promotes a dimensional effect on the front façade aiding in the reduction of the massing as viewed from the right-of-way. While there are a number of decorative elements introduced on the front elevation, the rear and particularly the side (north and south) elevations display minimal features at best. It is therefore recommended that some of the proposed elements such as additional scoring or banding, windows and door surrounds, and variation of exterior be incorporated. This has been added as a condition of approval. At this time, the applicant has not provided a true color palette. Submittal of the actual exterior paint colors are also attached as a condition of approval. Further, the location of the pool within the south side setback is not permitted based on LDR 4.6.15(G). The pool must be relocated outside of the setback (minimum 10' setback) in order to be compliant with the LDRs and has been added as a condition of approval. Based on the analysis above, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j), 4.5.1(F), 4.6.15(G), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines for the construction of a new two- story residence. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate if Appropriateness for 325 SE 7th Avenue, based on positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j), 4.5.1(F), 4.6.15(G), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to conditions. C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness for 325 SE 7th Avenue, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), 4.5.1(F), 4.6.15(G), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Demolition Approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the non-contributing dwelling at 325 SE 7th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F). 325 SE 7th Avenue COA 2004-070 Marina Historic District Page 7 Certificate of Appropriateness Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for 325 SE 7th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), 4.6.15(G), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That additional architectural elements be incorporated into the side and rear elevations including but not limited to: banding, arched windows and door surrounds, and variation of the exterior; 2) That the south end of the proposed pool be relocated to comply with the required minimum ten foot (10') side setback; and, 3) That the applicant submit a true color scheme. Attachments: Proposed Elevations, Site Plan, Survey, Floor Plan, &Photos Report Prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner .. ^, 1 -,xtv 4ilvitm - r ,ri i /may' 1 .w • • ^�—lop, . _, f `, it .ram - ' --' i �k"�-.-.r f' � � t .�. v. irr h, !. �` t` , • -" t 4' .... '''„ P' _- `�.ram- a— .' ni ,:, ' 1` ., , • w . ..cry'`" c 4,t. 325 SE 7th Avenue-proposed demolition -,..- vi ' ,.• 414 ..1'''—; )• 1,-4` .,, "'.,-... ›; (4,.. ,. . ' , ' ..i;s*". '!.1." '''''',V 44•HI.A4Art..:5% R, ,. u Jf .. R f) , 0, �r 'ITS r , I 4� y y ,;;13 , 1 II * J � .-.—.t C-"ice"- it 41&1- s.� Front(west) elevation . J,,i . -,‘,..:t 1:,;,, ••\,,,, ' N' 0-4i., :t. .-;\ • ' ,::-.4*.;$ .-., . • ,,, .. ,Nk ,,, ,., c . .-. ` - ... , ,,,,•-, v i 2.„.i,c•e,„;', , 0 IkE •,,, r • .-..)1/4:11,!', ''t * 1•., ,, 1 \ , s . ''' '' • '''.' )' ,. A. it,. .. %,,. ' •I, • 1 .4, ' . ' --- --e' *4,,itol .4... ' 1..... A:$5,- ' •416 • .""-k. = - ..1144,...A* ..'...r. •"44 -, if."' '-. ' - ''.4 .1(...1%,.1 0." ''':'. • % ' 4'1":"V ' --- '' . .-.: low,. --:4'4`..- .-,: -1- -. . \ - • - ,.-.,,,, , 1 ,, .. ,:qt $-,r 4,•"?/ -116.‘. '"•.'" . .. ' # ' V 1 , I ' 'h'*4 . , • 11: ' •; .i_4-7,',-4" ' --, :.. • - • '';?" ,..- fe.•*-1 • .0. ..,16A.- ... : - , .. -L.. • ilk" °- amprewaysi - ,, . _ • 541‘,. •__ - , t•' ,s,,, '.. ., ,,.„-,•• Tilimie........."... _ :4,_ . i ..„ , I til lif . • .. . . ... i , , J. - - • -• , - -:;-, -. :- • --,-, •- . hi . ' . 11 . 41111111P".. • ---•.,, _-‘:-',.0.?",-. ,441.=,:-...' ' . -,.-. „ ,„:17104ti i'', -•*N. - •- 0•.'-sefr '4V,49`-:;"":' • , 41,144486,:„..„14481:teiNtgik„`" .'- : '' ''jk,f1.-- AekAllits,i• **Ar -- 4 ',pc 7464,01fr 444FIre4.,—-- .. . .,„., .. •,-. ...,, . At•. ' . 4, ,,,. f ilphi ,e- Front elevat io n ( gA,a lrka ge, ) ,.47. _ cl ._, "... _ 1 * I ,__i •, I • , . I _ , , . • 11 Ilir 4kkti,;- . ,. _t. —1 \ \ ,k, Salvaged window -.,. minallillelat,1,amiliiigfi f 4.:: oc. i L 2 . n. Salvaged window ULLRAI'OCACH DCLRAY OCv,Ct! HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 'III MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT P' 1993 1993 1001 2001 Agent: American Awning Project Name: Blue Anchor Project Location: 802 East Atlantic Avenue ITEM BEFORE _THE BOARD The action before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I Site Plan Modification for the installation of an awning on a non-contributing property, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). (Continued from the November 19, 2003 meeting). BACKGROUND The subject property contains three buildings (802-840 East Atlantic Avenue) that include among other retail and office uses, the Blue Anchor and Busch's Restaurant and related parking areas. The Blue Anchor building is located at the southeast corner of East Atlantic Avenue and Palm Square, within the Marina Historic District, and is zoned CBD (Central Business District). Constructed in c. 1957, the building is considered non-contributing due to its age and recent alterations to the façade. On November 19, 2003, the Board reviewed a request for the installation of a 10' wide by 36'8" long, shed style, vinyl awning along the west façade of the building. The Board had several concerns regarding the material, location, and dimensions. The Board felt the awning should be canvas, project 6' from the building to cover the outdoor dining area, and that the awning profile should be modified to a gable design above the side entrance. After discussing the proposal, the Board tabled the item. The applicant has submitted revised plans and is now before the Board for action. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of the installation of a navy blue, canvas, shed and gable style awning on the side (west) elevation. Centered over the door surround, the cross gable, measuring 6' in width, will project from the gable door surround. The gable is intended to mimic the gable door surround without concealing the entryway or the transom. Meeting Date:December 17,2003 Agenda Item: II.D. Blue Anchor 2003-307 802 East Atlantic Avenue Page 2 Open on both ends, the shed awning measures 36'8" long by 8' high and will project 6' from the building. The awning will be anchored to the building and is non-retractable. The awning will cantilever over the current outdoor seating (benches) without the need for support posts and will encroach into the Palm Square right-of-way approximately one foot (1') as permitted by the Delray Beach Building Official. ANALYSIS Compliance with Land Development Regulations: LDR Section 6.3.4 (Canopies) The proposed awning will provide protection from the elements. Based on a review by the Delray Beach Engineering Department and the City's Chief Building Official, the applicant is permitted to encroach into the right-of-way no more than one foot (1') and will be required to submit a Hold Harmless Agreement to mandate liability and maintenance by the building's owner prior to installation of the awning. If the awning is approved by the Board, the applicant is required to submit a Hold Harmless Agreement to be approved by the City Commission as a condition of approval. Design Elements Analysis LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8)(g) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. The proposed shed and gable designs are typical of those found throughout the Marina Historic District and are appropriate in material, color and location, design and dimensions. The gable, in particular, aids in highlighting the decorative door surround while the open ends reduce the massing facing Atlantic Avenue and Palm Square. The treatment is reversible and will not cause irreparable damage to the building. Positive findings can therefore be made with respect to Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(g). Blue Anchor 2003-307 802 East Atlantic Avenue Page 3 Compliance with the LDRs can be made provided the conditions of approval are addressed. ALTERNATIVE :=ACT ON-S A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA associated with the Class I site plan modification for the installation of an awning for 802 East Atlantic Avenue, Blue Anchor, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA and associated Class I site plan modification for the installation of an awning for 802 East Atlantic Avenue, Blue Anchor, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Approve the COA associated with the Class I site plan modification for the installation of an awning for 802 East Atlantic Avenue, Blue Anchor, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the awning does not encroach more than one foot (1') into the Palm Square right-of-way (6' from the building); and, 2) That prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant enter into a Hold Harmless Agreement with the City. Attachments:Awning specifications&Photos Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner • • a �� <, r .,-.- • 40 ... it airli _ . . . •. . :. ... f yam. Jft x a 91".s -.$ .kt - 802 East Atlantic, Blue Anchor Pub - west elevation ---,--i/V..,14'' '... : - i ';', '' ('-'','-'-•'' ($1***',,71::;y:'* r*1-"::•; TiS Yy: F (iftr"i, .z .; . — , si 3 • •-,- m L e ,�-' "" 1,,,i'� : %r r ,_f 1 ram\ I 01 \ T . _: . .,__ .._;___ ., r .. ..v ci,„5....1""."-t/ 66r, /v:7"--•,- a : a- ' i..„......._ ,„,..-- i 1 f i 1 ,H,..---- i . 1 g t . [.1 1 .. �� ,726y , cw oe No.of Frames Heading F.B.Truss Pipe Rafters Spreader Pipe Lace Pipe I Standards ameRica B.H. Header Pipe Truss Size O.A. Projections Bows V-Truss Pipe � �E Concrete Footer Size COMPANY,INC. F.H. Front Bar Ridge Pipe Up Right Braces Purlins Center TrussPalm Beach Area(561)832-7123 537 Pine Terrace (T) (B) I Base Flange Florida Watts 1-800-427-4665 West Palm Beach OUNDED 1925 Fax(561)833-9602 Florida 33405 I DCiRAYBUCH '-- _ i DCIRAYU(ACM Exert i HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT 1993 19'93 2001 2001 Agent: Delray Awning Project Name: Old School Bread Company Project Location: 814 East Atlantic Avenue ITEM,;BEFOR , .T.. E.. BOAR© . The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I Site Plan Modification for the installation of an awning on a contributing property, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKG"ROTUND The subject property is known as the Handelsman Property (802-840 E. Atlantic Avenue) which includes three existing buildings and associated parking areas. The property is located on the south side of East Atlantic Avenue just west of the Intracoastal Waterway and is zoned Central Business District (CBD). The proposal involves a portion of the center building at 814 E. Atlantic Avenue. Constructed in 1931, the Mission Revival style building is considered a contributing property within the Marina Historic District. The subject property has an extensive land use history. The following are the most recent land use actions to occur with respect to the subject bay on the property. On July 24, 2002, a building permit was issued for the interior improvements associated with changing the use from retail to restaurant to accommodate a proposed restaurant, the Caribe Café. At its meeting of August 7, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board approved the installation of vinyl signage for the proposed restaurant. During its meeting of September 18, 2002, the Board reviewed a Class II site plan modification for the conversion from retail to restaurant to ensure that proper parking was appropriated. The proposal included the installation of a 42' x 15.9' (667.8 sq. ft.) outdoor dining area within the breezeway/patio area along the east side of the building. The Board approved the request with the stipulation that further expansion into the adjacent (east) property at 816 East Atlantic Avenue be re-evaluated to meet the additional parking requirement. The applicant is now before the Board for consideration of a Class I site plan modification associated with the installation of an awning for the Old School Bread Meeting Date:December 17,2003 Agenda Item:II.E. f Old School Bread Company 2004-056 - 814 East Atlantic Avenue Page 2 Company. As the use is not being modified from the previously approved restaurant, the Board is not required to review the project for compliance with respect to the performance standards which includes assessment for parking. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of the installation of a hunter green, canvas, shed style awning over the walkway/patio area to the east of the building (between 814 and 816 East Atlantic Avenue). The awning measures 27' long by 8' high and will project 15' from the building (to the east). The awning will be placed approximately 4.2' from the right-of-way, which will lie flush with the front (north) elevation of the building. The non- retractable awning will be supported by hunter green, metal poles and will be anchored to the building. Drainage will be supplied by the property owner to direct any run-off from the awning. `£ ANALYSIS°< Design Elements Analysis LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8)(g) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. The proposed shed awning is typical of those found throughout the district and is appropriate in material, color, location, and dimensions. The treatment is considered reversible and will not cause irreparable damage to the building if removed or altered. While the awning will not overwhelm the building's façade and will provide adequate protection from the elements, the proposed awning should not cover the existing planter area including the Seagrape tree and should be re-designed to extend from the side door to the patio area without encroaching or covering the landscape strip. This will require re-designing the awning possibly from a shed to a gable style in order to ensure Old School Bread Company 2004-056 814 East Atlantic Avenue Page 3 that the landscape area remain uncovered. Re-designing the awning is attached as a condition of approval. The building (814 East Atlantic Avenue only) was previously assessed for parking during the conversion from retail to restaurant (including the 667.8 sq. ft. outdoor dining area), therefore no additional parking or review of performance standards (LDR Section 3.1) are required with this proposal. However, it is understood that any future increase of floor area or an expansion of the outdoor patio or seating area associated with this property will be assessed for additional parking and will require site plan modification approval. Positive findings can be made with respect to Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines once the condition, as stated above, is addressed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. _ Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA associated with the Class I site plan modification for the installation of an awning at 814 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Bread Company, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. C. Deny the COA and associated Class I site plan modification for the installation of an awning at 814 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Bread Company, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Approve the COA associated with the Class I site plan modification for the installation of an awning at 814 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Bread Company, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the awning be re-designed as a gable in order to ell from the front door out to the patio area without covering the existing landscape strip adjacent to (east of) the building. Attachments: Survey, Photos, & Awning specifications Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner tee ` r► _ e .a" - ,. Iiiii, ', lif.,. .'1' . -.,' ' .. • .1. ..- — • • ' ..-4 ..'''' li,' I ,g,i'• 4 _ 4.4.... ..44_, 4 -. - .... , " , U-.1b , _ , •• .. 21 ' -I.i„w 814 East Atlantic Avenue— Courtyard, east elevation _ I:-1,..,.,.. :7 . :_.. : Ilk. ..-" $L140 t . ,• . . ,.1. .. �•�• ''411 �•�•�•�•�• r JO TTT'-1 T . 'k,,,� � --�, 4 . . r ., ...4.....7. 'le.: •, • 1511 - -1 _ '1i:-. ' •. 1 ie. ,. . - ' , ei• \ , • - . k 0,..,,. Al . i..., 4"ri4,,- ..-. n. ....., _,:t",';' 74 ,'' ,I• ; •-,' I .... .. .' . I 1:'-1 - - i,- ;•'...::---. ,r-P%.- .'.'"v. •. - , ... 7. 1 / 1 ?.--. ---- - ---'-...-''- - ' ' -' '' „. , , / - I ' • i ' • _\ \ N- .) ' i t, • - - . I ' ‘ \ \ ' 1 , , \ \ ‘, , \ , \ , i j i , I I I '' '1 \ \ ' iN EAST ATLANTIC AVENUE PAVED I 0 fri In o d * —jr 0.7' CONC. CURB i NORTH OF LINE OF BLOCK 133 a L.P. BRICK WALK (PLANTERS NOT SHOWN) o S. RIGHT OF WAY LINE 50,0 I .N Cry,,.,,,,i 20.0' i tli/../////////.l.i.y/////./rA-� 4 NYC ►, / • 38.2 ' 2 / IL1 ' I., /� i w 4ac)� /\ . / STO Y z ' COMME CIAL COMMERCIAL p p Qo �� BUILDING BUILDING ; ?o;4 v, z1,tJ / k-o: �-qj oo /_' 1 moo: L z °off //.7. 0v if/fi//// / 3/ / / / BRICK / / - --/ N / / / 22,1' 3.9'%` Q ;<-,-,T%�ul.4/ ?// /,, 8 9 �• CON . WAL/tJ L ' CONC. / * I / �.1 CONC. Q CONC. /VC PAD • r - TED PARKING \ 0.6' CON CURB (T YPICAL) \ o / I L T 48 LO f 49 LOT 50 \ LOT 51 LOTA2 \ 1 \ I I n LE SE PARKING SPACES ' //® ® D ® 0 ,,9 ID ® PPAVED ARKING • c I Z WM U ANCHORS U POLES ELECTRIC Zo METER PANEL . ciL-1. PAVED PARKING PAVED PARKING 1 �. LOT 56 � GF \FA.L NOTES PA TI 0 AWNING • 1.ALL PIPE TO BE ASA SCHEDULE 40 GAL✓AN 17ED UNLESS NOTED OTHERw ISE. 2.ALL WELDS 70 COMPLY WITH A.W S.CODE.CURRENT ED IT ION. 3.ALL WELDS SHALL BE °/16"FULL F ILLE7 WELDS Uum. M.O. > \P 4..ALL WELDS TO BE COVEPED w 11 H ALUM m PAINT. 3/16- S- T.STRUCTURES HAVE BEEN DES IGHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE �� - 2001 FLOR IDA EU ILL ING CODE -SOUTH FLOR IDA BUILD ING CODE, 1999 EP.OWARD EDIT ION „1 / - STANDARD au ILD ING CODE, 1997 EDIT ION -ALL LOCAL AMENDMENTS TO THE AEOVE INCLUDING PBC AMENDMENTS,wPE ORD WA14CE SEC 2201.3(4)(d), - AND OTHER RELATED CODES d STA.IJDG.F.US. �� , ) \ ` c t✓ 'T`3,tAo J G- 6.FA.BR IC CAN/AS SHALL BE EXTEP.IOP.NOIJ METALL IC,NON-CORROSIVE r /WATER RESISTANT . ACTUAL FAER IC SCLCCT ION OUT OF SCOPE OF CCRT. f, _7.CHINAS AYJIJ INCS SHALL BE REMOVED WHEIJ W INDS REACH 75 MPHY!IIJIJS UR SHALL EC IIJSIALLCD SUCH 1HAT 7HL FAER IC CO'✓CF.IIJG /.............. "�i ' ti"`i C v 't O v Y1 ILL RELEASE FROM THE HOST FRAME WITH A PRESSURE OF 15 LE/SOFT. -`1 ` r, . ` 1 I E.FRAMES w ITHOUT COVER ING HAVE BEEN DESIGNED EY RAT TONAL ANALYSIS /- • i 0 n'Il HSi AND 14UTAPH W INDS U5 ING SEC CHAP 16 L ASCE 7-98(EXPOSURE , . /r/i 'E•L 'C"),AND 11DMPH W INUS USIIJG ASCE-7 93. , 9.THE AWN INC OWNER SHALL EE NOT IF IED or THESE COND IT IONS BY THE • `--» Jf F-[ku IT HOLDER. ND WARRANTY,EXPRESSED ORIIAPLIED, 7 IS C'OIJMA.INED HERE IN. 10.CNG NJEER SEAL ACF WED HERETO VAL!DATES STRUCTURAL DESIGN •I _i' I� .-' f 1 I /�� .. f t• /' AS SHOWN MY.USE OF THIS SPEC IF!CAT TUN E1 THE CONTRACTOR, 1� i .i/' - Ti INC.,e1.o1. INDEMN IF TES AND SAVES HARMLESS TR iS ENG WEER FOR ALL �� 1 - COSTS AND DAMAGES INCLUD INC LEGAL FEES AND APPELLATE FEES /, r+ J f PrSUL7 INC FROM MATERIAL FABR ICAT ION,SYSTEM ERECT ION,& / P !/f _ PRAM ION PRA ICES BEYOND THAT WHICH IS CALLED FOR El' 0 I• LOCAL.STATE,d FEDERAL CODES Jr FROM DEV IAT IONS OF THIS PLAN. / 11.EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS SPEC IF ICAT ION,NO ADD IT IONAL I if .3.- " V 7 IF ICAT IONS OR AFF IRMA7 IONS ARE 1NTEIJDED. -'�---_ / 10 c, Awvs.,,,aCr- Cv L-cr sex_ I fit=Er-) si - 1 (//1 -T- • • • • ,. I `H`. .©t.-o Sc.McO._ �Q'.t Y1O C—U il R� S ► � �. (-AN-\�t., ily.,e— I .DLLRAY AIMING.,G, INC. I 74 e. ex .4,... .c 80 North Congress Avenue •'Delray Beach, Florida 33484 Phone (561) 276-5381 DELRAY BEACH SIGN IN SHEET Ally 1993 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting of December 17, 2003 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM ORGANIZATION FEKC(f 51-LF.F k-L HSW-T 3 -k- 9C )4 :_p//,/(144_-_/ ilAlcc:a/6.0(1 ./44/A.//nt Eretrono _i �rv ,\\o \\M-eina--Tonal M0-(edI Ill VA-L-vv n..e/Liv;oiClor- C 1-6 1 2-e_c r l -E�SLE�c (-,fie/r1,/,./ta0( IVI • Li; l HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD LCITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: December 179', 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Ill. A. ITEM: 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue (Del-Ida Park Historic District) Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements for the conversion of a non-contributing duplex to an office. N f. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIB II : """1"""h'IE r > \N.E. 12TH ST. GENERAL DATA: r " 1-. - i Owner/Applicant International Materials, Inc. N.E. • • 11TH ST. r a' Agent Everett Jenner W Location West side of Northeast 3rd i Avenue, approximately 287 N.E. ._„ 0 T. r - feet south of George Bush - r Boulevard. Property Size 0.27 Acres "€ , 9TH ST. r Future Land Use TRN (Transitional) w Map Z i,, , •urrent Zoning RO (Residential Office) ,1 -: � Adjacent Zoning North: RO (Residential Office) •,� ` NNE East: RO (Residential Office) — Q�� ,, . South: RO (Residential Office) 1 ,�`- f West: RO (Residential Office) , ff1, , Existing Land Use Multiple Family Residence o Proposed Land Use Conversion of a ,., ild non-contributing duplex �' `� to an office. e Ak. ,,o-t- Water Service Existing on site. a+� TN TERR. R �' Sewer Service Existing on site. '111„'=milillim 1- \_6111. N.E. STH CT. >' 2 0 6�. 7 ��SD ST. W )21 V N.E. aTH POST _ \ OFFICE — ^ i 'L''' NNN, — ,..i4-`, Ill. A. WOA-RD W. The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): Cl Class V Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; ❑ Design Elements; ❑ Internal Adjustment; and, ❑ Landscape Waiver. The subject property is located on the west side of NE 3rd Avenue, approximately 100' south of Dixie Boulevard. BACKGROUND 4 St Zoned Residential Office (RO), the property consists of Lot 26, Block 10, Del-Ida Park and currently contains a 1,372 square foot non-contributing, duplex constructed in 1953. Located on an interior lot on the west side of NE 3rd Avenue, the property is currently situated between a single family home and an office. There are no recent administrative or Board actions regarding this property. The applicant has submitted a COA associated with a Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements for the conversion of the duplex to an office building and is now before the Board for consideration. Aw PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal includes the following: ❑ Removal of the concrete patio at the rear of the building; ❑ Conversion of a 1,372 sq. ft. one-story, duplex to an administrative office for a building material distributor; o Construction of a six (6) space paver block parking lot including one handicapped accessible space; and, ❑ Installation of concrete walkways, associated landscaping, and refuse container area. Meeting Date:December 17,2003 Agenda Item: II.A. HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3`°Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 2 PLAN AN:A t YS S. COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The following table indicates the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the Residential Office (RO) zoning district: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 11' Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 25' 30.15' Side Interior (north) 15' 24.4' Side Interior (south) 15' 29' Rear 25' 25.4' Open Space 25% 36.8% LDR Section 4.4.17 (RO-Supplemental District Regulations): Parking Requirement: Pursuant to LDR 4.4.17(G)(2), parking for business and professional offices shall be at the standard of one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of total floor area. As the proposed use is office, parking is calculated at one space per 300 sq. ft. A one-way driveway with adjacent parallel parking surround the building with four spaces behind the building (east elevation) and two spaces to the side (north elevation). Based on the proposed square footage of 1,372, 4.57 or 5 parking spaces total are required, and 6 spaces, including one handicapped accessible space, have been provided. Drive Aisle Width: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(b), the point of access to a street or alley shall not be less than 12' for a one-way driveway or parking lot aisle. The applicant is proposing the construction of an 11' wide drive aisle at the rear of the building to provide one-way access to the rear parallel spaces. The applicant has requested an internal adjustment to reduce the required width. Further, in order to accommodate the require 6" type "D" curbing, a landscape wavier has been requested to reduce the landscape strip from the required 5' to 4'. An analysis regarding the landscape waiver can be found under the "Landscape Analysis" section below. HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3`d Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 3 Internal Adjustment Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(C)(5), concurrent with granting relief from a development standard or regulation, the granting body must find that such relief does not diminish the practical application of the affected regulation (requirement) and that by granting such relief a superior development product will result. Due to the narrow width and configuration of the lot and based on the location of the extant building, an internal adjustment reducing the required one-way drive aisle width from 12' to 11' can be supported. The City Engineer supports the reduction of the drive aisle width due to the current lot configuration and in order to meet the required parking demands. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Bike Rack Though the property is outside of the City's TCEA (Transportation Concurrency Exception Area), the applicant has provided a bike rack located at the southeast of the extant historic building. Site Lighting Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting is required on site for new development proposals. A photometric plan has not been submitted to ensure the lighting requirements as outlined in LDR Section 4.6.8 have been met. The applicant has provided coach lighting on each elevation, however, additional lights may be necessary in order to comply with LDR Section 4.6.8. Therefore, a condition of approval has been added that a photometric plan is provided. Underground Utilities Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.8, utility facilities serving the development shall be located underground throughout the development. The site plan indicates that the existing overhead utility lines will be buried. Sidewalks Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5'wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-way adjacent to the property. An existing 6' sidewalk currently runs along NE 3`d Avenue providing accessibility to the building via the internal concrete walkway. Refuse Container Area The proposed refuse area is centered along the west elevation of the building. The refuse container will be placed on a paver block pad and will be screened by a 30" Simpson Stopper hedge. While the refuse container area has been delineated on the site and landscape plans, there is no notation that recyclables with be accommodated. Accommodations for recyclables has been added as a technical item. HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3`d Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 4 Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) That site data be provided on the site plan including the current and proposed building setbacks. 2) Note the removal of the concrete patio on the landscape plan. 3) A Wellfield Notification Form must be submitted to the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management and to the City. 4) Provide a detail of the proposed pavers and other proposed appurtenances. 5) A notation should also indicate that the refuse container must accommodate recyclables. 6) Indicate the location and type of curbing proposed. 7) Note the use of the building. It should also be noted that no equipment storage will be permitted on site. 8) Provide additional landscaping in the corners and terminus of the proposed parking area. 9) Provide certified exfiltration trench test results. 10) Provide paving cross section on engineering plan, not site plan. 11) Parking layout and striping need to follow City of Delray Beach standards. Provide standard City of Delray Beach parking stall detail and put detail on engineering plan, not site plan. 12) Indicate sight distances at all ingress/egress points. Sight triangles should be indicated on landscape plans. Provide a copy of the revised landscape plans that accurately show existing tree trunks in site triangles. 13) Indicate location of separate irrigation water meter. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS Both existing and proposed landscaping will be interspersed throughout the property. Existing landscaping consists of an Areca Palm, Black Olive, Mango Tree, and a Carambola Tree at the rear of the property. A Ficus tree lies at each corner of the entrance to the drive aisle (northeast and southeast corners) and an existing ficus hedge is located along the north property line. Some giant liriopes will be relocated on site and the existing pothus, located at the northeast corner of the property, will also remain. HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 5 Proposed landscaping includes a Yellow Cassia Tree, Gumbo Limbo Trees, Cat Palms, an Australian Tree Fern, and a Hawaii Ti Plant lining the rear (west) and sides (south and north) of the property adjacent to much of the parallel parking. Underplantings that will encase the perimeter of the property and the building include: Simpson Stopper, Cocoplum, Heliconia, Wart and Macho Fern, Giant Liriope and Pothus. While the proposal complies with the majority of the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16, pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(i), a landscape island is required at the terminus of the parking area at the southwest corner and protective curbing must be provided. In addition, the proposed liriope should be diversified with other underplantings introduced for variety. Both have been added as landscape technical items. Waiver Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscape strip of not less than five (5) feet in width, excluding the curbing, shall be located between the vehicular use area and abutting properties. The proposal includes a request for a waiver to reduce the landscape strip on the west, north, and south property lines (adjacent to the building only) from the required 5' to 4'. Reduction of the landscape strip will accommodate the required 6" type "D" curbing" along the drive aisle and between the landscape strip and parallel parking spaces. No curbing is proposed between the right-of-way and the building. As discussed under "Drive Aisle Width" it is recommended that the drive aisle is a minimum of 11' wide thus, the landscape strip will be reduced accordingly to 4', which is discussed below. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver;; a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation;and, d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Given the site constraints including the location of the building and the proposed parking configuration, the waiver is necessary to accommodate the 6' curbing along the drive aisle adjacent to the building and between the landscape strips and parallel parking spaces. Given the analysis above, the waiver request will neither adversely affect the neighboring area nor grant a special privilege to the property owner based on the current configuration of the property and since other conversions from residential to commercial have been granted such waivers. No public facilities will be at risk and no unsafe situations shall be formed by the granting of this waiver. Based on this analysis, positive findings can be made to grant the requested waiver pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B). Landscape Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1)That the south property line have underplantings rather than strictly mulch. HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 6 2)That the proposed liriope be diversified with other underplantings introduced. 3)That the terminus of the parallel parking at the southwest corner have landscaping incorporated into it and curbing encircling it. 4)That 6" type "D" curbing be provided adjacent to the building and between the parallel parking spaces and the landscape area. DESIGN ELEMENTSIANALYSIS Residential Conversion to Commercial The proposal includes conversion of a non-contributing, one-story duplex to office. Constructed in 1953, the masonry vernacular building is approximately 1,372 sq. ft. The building will be rehabilitated with no alterations to its original vernacular footprint. Existing The one-story, block dwelling displays minimal architectural detailing that includes: a standing seam metal, side facing gable roof, rectangular gable vents, and a smooth stucco exterior with limited wood siding and brick facing. Board and batten siding is also found within the gables. Fenestration includes aluminum awning windows and single entry doors into each unit on the front and rear elevations. While the existing windows are not impact resistant, storm panels are provided and storm panel tracks have already been installed above and below each window opening. Proposed The proposed project includes the removal of the single entry doors on the front façade and the installation of paired, panel entrance doors with sidelights centered on the front façade. One of the doors on the rear elevation will be removed as well as a window opening. The wood siding will be removed on the front façade and the brick facing on the north and south elevations will be stuccoed over. Coach lights will be installed on either side of the entry doors on the front façade and at the corners of each elevation. Finally, fixed, louvered shutters with shutter dogs will be installed flanking the windows on the east, south, and north elevations. A new color palette is proposed with the project which includes the use of "Province Blue," a gray blue color, for the body of the building, "London Fog," a darker grayish blue, for the fascia, "Alpine White" for the shutters, sills, gable ends, soffits, and windows, and "Carlsbad Coral " for the entrance doors. As these colors are fairly muted and since variations of these hues can be found within the surrounding district, the proposed color scheme can be supported. HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3`d Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 7 LDR Section 4.5.1(E)- Design Elements Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), (E)(8)(c), (d), and (g), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating alterations or additions of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non- contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8)(c) The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the opening exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (E)(8)(d) The relationship of solid to voids in the front façade of a building or structure will be visually compatible with the front facades of historic buildings or structures within the district. (E)(8)(g) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: 1) A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2) Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3r Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 8 Analysis The proposed rehabilitation involves minimal alterations to the building's facade. The applicant proposes a change in the proportion of openings with the installation of a new entry door and proposes a minimal change to the exterior by removing the recent addition of wood siding and stuccoing over the brick facing. While office is a permitted use within the RO zoning district, the building associated with the conversion may not be utilized for any type of tool or equipment storage other than that directly affiliated with the administrative office use such as files or office equipment storage as stated in the site plan technical item. As the elevation changes are the minimal necessary to facilitate office use on this property and since the chosen color palette is appropriate in relation to the surrounding historic district, positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), (E)(8)(c), (d), and (g)• REQUh- {.ED F #`N © INGS ' .._. . Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Transitional (TRN) and a zoning designation of Residential Office (RO). The RO zoning district is consistent with the TRN Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.17(B)(3), within the RO zoning district, business and professional offices are listed as permitted uses. The proposal will accommodate the administrative offices of a materials distributor. There will be no storage of vehicles, materials, or equipment at the location, which is prohibited in the RO district. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A), Future Land Use Map Consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency(Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 9 Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan was conducted and no applicable goals, objectives or policies were found. Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bounded by the Residential Office (RO) zoning district with a combination of office and residential uses. Compatibility is not a concern, as the proposed office use is permitted on the surrounding properties. The proposal retains the existing residential character, building style, scale, and massing and accommodate adaptive re-use of the building in the Del-Ida Park District, once the conditions have been addressed. Based on the above, the development will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent properties. sue;REVIEW BYrOTHERS' z Community Redevelopment Agency The project proposed for the Kemish Office Building was reviewed by the CRA during its meeting on October 9, 2003. The CRA Board recommended approval subject to staffs conditions of approval. ASSE'SSMENT_sA:N.DCONCLUSI0N.. The development proposal involves the conversion of a 1,372 sq. ft. duplex to office. The internal adjustment to reduce the width of the drive aisle can be supported in order to accommodate the one-way driveway and required parallel parking. The landscape waiver is necessary in order to accommodate the required 6" curbing adjacent to the parallel parking spaces and can be supported based on the analysis provided. The proposal will be consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan with changes as identified in this staff report. These changes are outlined as conditions of approval. HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3`d Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 10 ATEJRNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements for 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), (E)(8)(c), (d), and (g), Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements for 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue, based upon failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), (E)(8)(c), (d), and (g), with basis stated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Waiver Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), to reduce the landscape strip on the west, north, and south property lines, adjacent to the parking area, from the required 5' to 4', based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B). Internal Adjustment Approve the internal adjustment to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(4)(d), to reduce the one-way drive aisle along the west property line from the required 12' width to 11', based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(C). Site Plan Approve the COA for the Class V site plan for 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report; and, 2) That a photometric plan is provided. Landscape Plan Approve the COA for the landscape plan for 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16. • HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 11 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report; and, 2) That a terminal landscape island be provided along with protective curbing at the southwest corner of the parking area. Design Elements Approve the COA for the design elements for 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), (E)(8)(c), (d), and (g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. Attachments: Survey, Site Plan,Landscape Plan,Elevations,Floor Plan HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3`d Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 12 APPENDIX_ A CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists via a service lateral connection to the 6" water main along NE 3rd Avenue right-of-way. ❑ Sewer service exists via a service lateral connection to a 8" sewer main along NE 3rd Avenue right-of-way. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided via existing a fire hydrant on the east side of NE 3rd Avenue at the intersection of Royal Court and NE 3rd Avenue. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build- out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standards. Drainage: A preliminary drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on- site via sheet flow to a swale area along the south side of the property. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. Streets and Traffic: A traffic statement was submitted indicating that the 1,372 sq. ft. office development will generate 47 average daily trips (ADT) onto the surrounding roadway network. There is adequate capacity to accommodate the additional 33 trips per day. Thus, a positive finding can be made with respect to traffic concurrency. Schools: The subject property is located outside of the City's TCEA, however, as this project does not involve the addition of residential units, the project is exempt from School Concurrency. Parks and Recreation Facilities: Parks dedication requirements do not apply to this non-residential use. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for a conversion of a 1,372 sq. ft. duplex to office. Trash generation is based upon the worst case scenario of office use. Trash generated each year by the proposed 1,372 sq.ft. office will be 3.7 tons of solid waste per year (1,372 x 5.4 = 2,000 = 3.70). The trash generated by the existing single family home is 1.99 tons of solid waste per year resulting in an increase of 1.71 tons per year. The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 13 service standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3`"Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 14 APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR SITE- .PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent X — Will meet standard once a photometric plan is provided in compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8. B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent • • HPB Staff Report 710-712 NE 3rd Avenue-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 15 F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location,without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent k J I 3} / -- LEGEND -- 0 1 � I I —' 710 & 712 2 N.E. 12TH T. _ N.E. 3RD I T BOND WAY 0 AVENUE - i Iiv N.E. 11TH ST. Mr m LEVEL-CLASS V - N SITE PLAN APPROVAL , W - - iNci cc N.E. 10TH $T. I 710&712 N.E.3RD AVE. 0 Z I '- N SUBJECT AREA alk Alla N.E. 9TH ST.- Mil Li I SUPPLEMENTAL DATA Z 41 I FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY z �J PCN#:12-43-46-09-29-010-0260 I. IL: . gUS}i BOULEVARD 1!iiiiiiii L4;14 I = APPROXIMATE ACREAGE:0.27 ABRIDGED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .: - - OOJ ,:: .. ZONING:RO OFFICSIDENTIAL/ E) I FLUM:TRN(TRANSITIONAL) 0 a I ' N.E. 7TH ST. N.E. 6TH ST. Z ,Z ACURA — EXISTING LAND USAGE: ,� I O p OF = RESIDENCE �G>. . , °� 0D DELRAY WITHIN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS �p� ,F BEACH ZONE:#533 0 N.E. 5TH TERR. rr N.E. 6TH ST. — \ WITHIN CENSUS -� i M ` TRACT:#65.01 4 _N,,, N Z O n I Z (-- PLANNING - , C N.E. 5TH CT. I = _( *ZONIN EPARTMENT kdk .„ ) , vi PUBLIX uj N.E. 15TH ST. N ,(45- c-'. , N.E. 5TH ST. I 11 - E r = ' v - jV I4� GREENS _ S w — Z— = GREENS = LONG-RANGE DIVISION N.E. 4TH ST, J DIGITAL BASE-MAPPING & s Q Q - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION YP SYSTEM . OFFICOSTE 41 W 2 MAP REFERENCE/:LM744 wy E _ — DECEMBER 2003 -- Ln a Q f 111 •--- Law Li = 'gsileglear V�P _ Z 40 Z N.E. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST.I I rrm MTh rrrrrn r� r u:\c LMw Backup\I-PROJECT RENEW MAPS\HPB SRZ DEIRAYB AUl _ _ , DftRAYOUCH lir HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD l MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT/ � 1993 1001 ;'. 1001 Agent: Jones Awnings & Canvas, Inc. Project Name: Brisa Atlantica Project Location: 9 SE 7 Avenue TEM_.oBEFORE TtHE BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I Site Plan Modification for Brisa Atlantica, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). WBACKGROUND. _ ._._.. .z The property consists of Lots 1-3 and 9-11 of Block 125 (Replat of the original Town of Linton subdivision) and contains approximately 0.40 acres. The two-story 2,215 sq. ft. frame vernacular dwelling was constructed in 1924 and is considered a contributing historic building within the Marina Historic District. A non-contributing 621 sq. ft. garage lies behind (east of) the main building. The majority of the property is zoned CBD (Central Business District), while the southern portion of the property (the parking area) is zoned RM (Multiple Family Residential-Medium Density). The project is located on the east side of SE 7th Avenue, approximately 90' south of East Atlantic Avenue. The building was constructed as a single-family residence and was originally located adjacent to East Atlantic Avenue. In circa 1940, the building was relocated to its present location in order to permit the construction of the existing two- story mixed-use building along Atlantic Avenue, subsequently constructed in 1941. The first floor of the building was previously utilized as a beauty salon and the second floor contained an apartment. At its meeting of March 21, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board approved a Class III site plan modification for the conversion of the building to a restaurant known as Elizabeth's on 7th which included enclosure of the porch for use as the kitchen, installation of a walk-in cooler, modification of the parking area including an off-site parking agreement, and associated landscaping. The Board directed the applicant to . revise the parking areas to provide additional parking spaces in an effort to eliminate the need for the off-site parking agreement, which restricted the hours of operation for the restaurant. During its meeting of April 12, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved a Class II Site Plan Modification for the demolition of the garage, construction Meeting Date:December 17,2003 Agenda Item: II.B. Brisa Atlantica 2004-064 • 9SE7Avenue ' At Page 2 ` of a 300 sq. ft. patio/outdoor dining area, refuse containers, and associated landscaping. On October 16, 2002, the Board granted an extension of the Class II Site Plan Modification for the conversion from retail to restaurant including the garage demolition, construction of a 300 sq. ft. outdoor dining area, refuse containers, and landscaping however, the project was never initiated. On January 15, 2003, the Board reviewed and approved elevations changes to the contributing historic dwelling and the associated garage for the Brisa Atlantica Restaurant. The improvements were initiated and are currently being completed. The applicant is now before the Board to review the installation of five vinyl awnings, relocation of the NC units, and an exterior color change. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of the installation of five melon colored, vinyl, shed style awnings with crenelated valance to be located on the front and rear (east and west) elevations. Two of the proposed awnings are new while the other three are existing and are to be recovered to match those proposed in color and design. The new awnings will cover the front entrance and rear patio area of the building. The front (west) awning measures 22' wide by 7' high and will project 5'5" from the building. The rear awning measures 24' wide by 7' high and projects 12' from the building. All awnings are non- retractable. The awning on the west side will extend over a sidewalk café area, while the awning in the rear (288 sq. ft.) will extend over an outdoor dining area. The new awnings will be supported by metal poles painted to match the awning color. The three existing awnings (currently black) measure 4.2x3 and 3x4 respectively and are anchored directly to the building, cantilevered over the front windows on the front facade. The applicant is also requesting alteration of the present color scheme of blue-gray for the body of the building and white for the trim to a brighter color scheme that will compliment the architectural elements of the building and will highlight the location to differentiate the commercial property from the adjacent, residential properties. The applicant is proposing an exterior color change to "Salmonberry," a rich peach, for the body, white for the trim, and "Basil" or "Kodiak," deep shades of olive green, for the accent color (such as the window frames). The proposal also includes relocation of the three air conditioning units from behind the building, (adjacent to the building) to the northeast corner of the building, on the north side of the existing 6' high privacy fence. Two additional units were also added. A new concrete pad will be provided for the units and ficus hedge will be planted as screening from SE 7th Avenue. Brisa Atlantica 2004-064 9 SE 7 Avenue Page 3 ANALYSIS Design Elements Analysis LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8)(g) Al! improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. The proposed shed awnings are typical of those found throughout the district and are appropriate in material, color, design, dimensions, and location. The proposed melon color is intended to compliment the proposed color scheme of the building. The paint and awning treatments are reversible and will not cause irreparable damage to the building. Further, as the proposed exterior colors are complimentary to the proposed melon color of the awning and as such colors can be seen throughout the adjacent historic district, the proposed color scheme is appropriate. In addition, the relocation and adequate screening of the NC units is necessary in order to minimize noise and to utilize the rear 288 sq. ft. patio area for seating. Based on the analysis above, positive findings can be made with respect to Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(g). ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA associated with the Class I site plan modification for 9 SE 7 Avenue, Brisa Atlantica, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. C. Deny the COA and associated Class I site plan modification for 9 SE 7 Avenue, Brisa Atlantica, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. Brisa Atlantica 2004-064 9 SE 7 Avenue Page 4 RECOMMENDATION Approve the COA associated with the Class I site plan modification for 9 SE 7 Avenue, Brisa Atlantica, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. Attachments:Survey, Site and Landscape Plan,Awning Specifications, &Photos Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner --L. -VA S 0 ---- - (r � _ 7 1,4,4 IOU u l El El I,„:r.,_L_:T:j..n..rL..rt..._i__._:_,„ ,„ •,. 2 Jr le 1. __ , - ----- _____ fla "I > . ___:=1.V.21,:LANC.-57_3) . ., -------L7 \ . -4/-----\_:0-andiallaillSimimellil7111%mmegelaii . 12/2 \/AI'AIS'I(' _4 . .4 -----r -- - 1% .. 1.-r-1-\\........./..ri...\.........F1111/4,11\01711% e ._X---1()_ 1)' 7-- --- i,.. it- • , -- -- 1. 7. -gt 1 ......___cc2 -- „., -, . ...._ . 2 -Aw- *® --- - • • - .. • , „.4. / 4u t-cç -1 '-! ( 111 8 0 -S-+ j 14 Tr-6 ----VA---CANc.E E- P RAW hl W(TN — -- `'v4" dP_el 1.Q USE_ - NO`1-- 5 N b(\ ____ . . ._ ._ . 01110N Ak, -F- .2. 5013 9 ' I- ") Da D 40 -#- ()-.); (( 1)p. A.,._t (2v 4 10 e / .1,, -pr- B y TLA.-es p Ay tsrz- L)42D. /4-..:_s- tA,.• .mac.... 4. (S.Pew i Iu 2C"l't o 0^ d ' " o-.r1-ep ri't St D p' 4!!c- ge Ki tz- c'- /Y10 neg.,4.?€.e 5 4 2 4i�o -�I �' p[tu.ti 7oo(t- Tv /yt Z y w 3 yi�� t— 6i _.// / } 7-- /iv The.„y Fx0,4_, I- c. le fritZ)+444-e- ./.) /4 e______,,0,16,e . /4" 1 1 1 it V '7 g ot1G (A)pl.t/ lrewcE iso-1.--tz,"''. f Se7" �R►a vane {�-f . (A,Co A4R4�-G . -t LY r • mr � - nlll��l' .. ' '.:---.— :At: � J. I ,_.-- i , i P4 : .... .: . - .- 11 :1' --.-':-1, r } ie7 - 641 :. I '."- _____ — ! ! Brisa Atlantica, 9 SE 7th Avenue—West Elevation ,o` r I rv- i. • 1 • 7 T. . r i a". t.. .. . .-..... ......-,..;:. ;A;,--.•.•:.,,, ill ..,- :•:.:„.'f-..*.:,-':$>. '...•: -z.-:4*.•.,.-.;-",:f4;,,-.2":.'-..- ,. , ° .-,i,. ..,... :....:,-?....,,,,,.-..., ., . .,:: ....,;;;?,. ...:„..-:',1t :. .:. •. i!.. . , 1:41t,'',:),,• • - ... . • ''./:•1",'•:.',- -,'.':•,•:;'.„,.. . i % -:*1.... • '' , . ••••,', „ !,' • . . I i 1 1 0 _. --•:;. .- . . -- , . „a.-- .„ ...,_,.., ... .-..-.----L- .:. . ,--.--r-:..... ..., ..........,,-- , , , # .:.„ _. A -, i I ....A l';', ' • t-i - li ,--- f.- • .... i iv .. 0 ....... . '' ' '411 i' IM 1 l• I:17 ,..,,,A*Ii..... :.- .1 re ',1-, ) v. • , •,,,,:,,,I .:. „... ...,::--„,, ,, , . ii I: ,14 . .. •• , ._ , -7 • -• •,- lora* _ iNi , - .-...• - ,-:. . - •--. , - .. . ..... _.- • -.........„ • . - -• _ ..,, _7! .' 11I -,-._-:-,-,. - -...... ......---- -. • ',"' ),f, • -- --- . '-'.'..--.'4;4.4,- --;;Ii;!`"--';'' ',.'''''' ' • , .,...- .,.. A.aiillik.411111111111111111.1 --. „.........__ .,._ I - . •..,, ' • ••,...•••-•2! ,.'1, i • __---. ______-------- ,. ili,'.._ •..._ , . '11 ! i' • V -.;,-7-:;• 3.1 IMP 1 .-i . ' t • , • _ , ..4, . , . . , ]iii...I :,:.:,1 1 1 ,- . ..i -;4 •,i 1 1 . 1 i . ii., . ,, . • , 'I'l Aiii iiiii 1,,111 illiii • .„_- , .- _ ___- , ." -, -: t"---'----4' i . : 1 j*Ligt.' ,_... ' •_i-.4,:!k,i . --, r , , . i :)-' ' -.'_ I -"1:0141..- --....‘-1..,••••,_ ..,........,.. ,-.• .., _...----- I I ...... ..: .,.. mire • , .... ....., _ .,.,:•_ • •.!•Lr-.-- 0 ,.. East elevation SKEICF _�j J�yL p1 {f f _ t n • '.': Zi (k1.,� s1 �, o`''r In I.r A l 1b1 ... GUr1k ' ;:c` r' r 1lGNl PO ,„1. ,, ',. :' Fac . c �. rAI'�41 19dA nl � i � g�• �- - , , .,i 1aw a+,. + :,'.akg q„,, p F[it b;✓ >r: • '''':"'t'''''''''' ''''4'''.'-' 'd"--:-.'777\1r2).;', ,• "-,PiNfil6AWotte......: ... 1 4,./..,,3•6 . 4;� 0 •. ;11 5.00 a ?�.DS , O a Dlb pK 9 �/ 5 fr1U PK S 20 D' ii: : -1 o'q� 14�.00 I pl;K O. .O. k ' rf( Z,,pS to r ? / S✓F/�y M wr M s;%i YID M ra t r, 9L !�.00 25.E 25.00: r Urv': N . I Oa r. I o 6 Y �� o�; We Q * . fit;# • �q VliiVAS 1.0 " i 1 v o Cr Aw181'>a © " v- _ .IOR;H ()tit OF ";b4 `^ • OVERNRNG �' BOW 125 i I -- bultult.Jr) h F . �a 5U! / r'ii r / /l 1D,I 1 / /✓/J///1 .OD I; . fi A .n1A 0' • 'sa.- • 1_'4 t 1 +'r'i ) V h L ai ,, jt > } W�� I.V �7 �s k ' ry l .iiii, t .lam • r , 4 a }:>�J'(" i Ii)4��" S,l iD , :iy. �t1 ` -v, � Gr a ja 7.i� • � -(7 a'' e' ' -// 7 � ojJ 1• U'.1rive.. (ooxPo ;peal IB6,� ' 'a iq ' ' ( 6 W°100 ,t • �. • Ldl 2 -,Aic rftYS ,j: 'i�)'1 ,1.L�{ a my rvA Q • i— , aS '',•,•:,::,.NA-,4.-.,,,'.L,,,',',.,..,,.",':,::,tm`,:q'.q.'',,.a''...-, -_;,-.q8._..,:1::1...4 StDRY WDfi °"'s�'° 4 1iV. ;-,.z,.... I• . a L(O 9 ,21,4 20 13 0 CFl C • J L0V • SS 1 'o'' '. _''1 f u� ;T 25;0I1 'G" i "I�) ` 70') •,FI . A.1 P. IIwltII� 1 ISM ,D �A 75.Cd ?5 O F r '� 25.0o p I Poi 0 QEr,I+1p1IFJG r '�' • ,),re : .a : . ?,,, ' 'Jt;,i 1;III 0 $COCK 125 / JU ` t {� • 3f w �9. �� /� lI'. IP I flfrlt(. 3K,b' :GU;11 01 i?ir'. IJOR1IIW6 T c ` u, i. p fRl v" a�4w • i ',C r oq m ' l UT //; 4 tFfY♦ 1 r Cj t 4 . ih m+c'' r 4 r a, k' wtC,P "'n. t 7., v' pi M a, j1. ,;;,: ' } r ,;„. `t { , wi•°f7Yz ! y'M• Nf+•.',"n �ft� k: 1 f4 1�1{,� ` :�e4 w1 +r , r *.K,,,4 g�`,y \ .r r t r S + 1!^Oh Cs 1 7< g y�,w r t t y r,J• vl �l'1 �i.}« x c,Y' i.�r Y�J1: * I S kV ryl d '� " 1 .N Jt `.. v tlr.` r , I ;:ek y $ �� awN^r�`fy NM:ir�r„I:, � y r .. 4x �r :r. ` V ) ' -j :-.,','' .,2•',-/-..;/2.W"1"......:..or'.77.,.,... .,,,:,./..ti. :8 t 7----- ' i VD i. ,d, _ t it c't d ,�J s'r Y $,, ; 4 Fr X �• t� 3 ` aV6"1'�„. ��r1t ry t w 3 � +(' � . 1 Y��iC I 4d z r <w k,ti.,:f �? ,,. ,,.. * h,, 17 , t.n , l ei(3 x, y '�, I bo 0o L i 64 1 I P 1. kX� ^. Q G7 �1 Sa_. ...Ham! �,'.I ';i")• o i I ,�PL i f;.*,p — «, L01 IZ 7,d o— Liv1 v :r L3 N_l= h • N IFF 4s•tikAC"1 •SAS:AttN'hF �tX, t:"DF 3?3ViCp' r CC� x7i 13 : g. a. IC yyEN1$tdFCh{�EF• WA APFECI THE IcUu EAST 0 STRF✓ sa J�,7 r+ d > = /,./ COMP/..T SPACES PROVIDED = 4 SPACES VENT BLOCK TO REMAIN I �.�NDICAPPED SPAC OV ED = - •CE , +•I'- - ' `% — -- TOTAL• SPACES P- YIDED = 11 SPAC' (ONE SPACE NAS SEEN ACCO TED FOR "IN IEU", AS ELIZASETN'S) / 4 _ �� !III %- �% ,i E.� •�'' 'I - =s -. nALL TO REMAIN • 9 6 "" �•oNve l "' 6 • GI-I WOOD PRIVACY FENCE TO REMAIN Y - / J,• � I I • S REMOVYJSTING GARAGE DOOR AND 'L Amitir NI=W LANDING/STEPS(MAT S AND GUARDRAIL = SEE-EXTERIOR ELEVATIOT'THIS S+�T . - _ _ �'"L ,'_ j j G�r o ra F ' AR EXIT (MATCH EXISTING NEW BIKE RACK I • / a 01�' � � TION) (SEE DETAIL SHT. •.o (/ J. •-4413 - • EXISTING POWER POLE -W REMAIN _mot. •00011 IPETAI► TO B•; • AT 3,I OF ) f ^ �rr ® .L ./ a, -- ...41 - .. __L___ ___)L • 'I 8_0 jy/ , � R, �OC TED A/C COND. UNITS 4 (4J_ Q I ) �`��) /'/4" LUE PAIDIICAPTED A IN �IcN, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET 4 HI X 14 L. X I0 W. CONC. PAD (ALSO . -' , � \ �} �� A . REFUSE CONTAINERS) ( J J -----) ,,,'. •---\ - 0 / 10'-�' LEI _ • , / - -y • - —}—-. ? EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN ./ / / (CUT CURB ONLY AS NECESSARY _� drr- ( - F—APARTMENT(STINGAI -y0 \• + v/ EE TRUNIU \ •-- - - Adif / / 7 ' , \.) GENE NOTE: RAMP GUARDRAIL —) / /--! / OTE FOR LAI�IDSCAPE ISLAND: T / 1\ -•-�_. AVE BEEN APPROVED PER CITY TO 6'43" / .-� - \ � 1 AN-ORIGINAL SPACE 4 A 2ND UPON FEN • T , _ ip.41 , � ' �.,� \ �-- \I LOT UJI 1&'-eFAC .III�Ili11�IlLi - • _:� II ,t i li I AREA OF CsREASE •P - - - -1 \ 1 5 - �. 10) FAN WA .(IN N_-C,Ep TO GREASE TRAP) ./� .(sEE $T!DiC �j E Cl1RBINCs, TYP. B. / I -6r . -. . ,� �a,_�.,I \ -tea-, 24'-0" bi --7--- 2‘Arl 4 ie _ �. • I-7- \ - - .-.- . ' , r 4" WHITE PAINTED STRIPES, TYPICAL I F _ EXISTING LANDING/STEPS AND GUARDRAIL AT SERVICE ENTRY . ASPHALT PARKING 0 e )T W/ 2 SPACES o, o, PRECAST CONCRETE WHEELSTOP, TYPICAL 11 I ,� // / LANDSCAPE AREA 0 0 - �E„.) 1IC" 1 - - - , / / ' ENTR" PATIO I ( TURE Gfir Y1,� EA-ING UNDER SE?t PERMIT) ` �� - EXISTING WATER METER TO R1=MAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY , 1111�� - --• - • -- - _ _ _ _ate -e � .zetl---- --- - -- -- .- . .-. -- -�- 1 __.. . — - - - -�� T h. �AT I ON LINE • � � 24" SQ_ CORAL PAVERS- ) �I 4( :IT§a (MST-4M C1iy DYED RS ItWIN �' C-9.-W-DEDfCAT i RCA) - ' in 08' 00" E 206.60' . — — — — ?OPERTY LINE - - - - E ING -OWER -O TO � MAIN EXISTING 5' CONCRETE WALK TO REMAIN NEW 4" DIA. DRAIN LINE FROM BUILDING ) .i _.....