HPB-02-05-03 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PUBLIC H E A R I N G
MEETING DATE: February 5, 2003
LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
I. ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:03 P.M. Upon roll call it
was determined that a quorum was present.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott,
Jim Keavney, William Branning, Francisco Perez-
Azua (arrived 6:09), Rhonda Sexton (arrived 6:12)
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Loretta Heussi
II. CERTIFICATES OF APPRORIATENESS
Ms. Jamison read the quasi-judicial regulations. Ms. Heussi swore in all those
wishing to speak.
A. Patrick Lynch Property, 226 South Ocean Boulevard, Nassau Park
Historic District, Roger Cope, Authorized Agent.
Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is a
Certificate of Appropriateness associated with Part II of the Tax
Exemption Application for the Patrick Lynch Residence, pursuant to
LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication by the Board.
No ex-parte communication took place.
Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the
proposed project. The project included elevation changes and an
addition to a contributing dwelling and new construction including a
new two-story dwelling, installation of walkways, and related site
improvements to the associated property which were previously
approved by the Board.
Mr. Cope was present to represent the project on behalf of the
applicant. Mr. Cope inquired about the expenditures for the
landscaping, pool construction, and fencing.
Ms. Shay stated that fencing was permitted.
After much discussion, it was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded
by Ms. Elliott and passed 5-0 to recommend to the City
Commission approval of Part II of the Tax Exemption Application,
the Final Application Request for Review of Completed Work for
site improvements at the Patrick Lynch Property, 226 South
Ocean Boulevard based upon positive findings with respect to
LDR Sections 4.5.1(M)(5)(a)(iii), (M)(5)(b) and (M)(11), the City's
Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation.
At this time, the agenda was amended to move item II.B. to the end
of the agenda as the applicant was expected but not yet present. It
was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed
7-0 to move item II.B. to the end of the agenda.
B. The Rectory, 14 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic
District, Dharma Holdings Limited, Authorized Agent.
Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is a
Certificate of Appropriateness and associated waiver for the
installation of a free-standing sign for The Rectory, pursuant to LDR
Section 2.4.6(J) and 2.4.7(B).
Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the
proposed project.
Mr. Tamorina was present to represent the project.
After much discussion, the item was tabled until such time as the
applicant submits more detailed information regarding the sign's
paint colors, dimensions, and text. The Board further directed the
applicant to construct a border around the sign to enhance its
definition.
It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Mr. Perez and
passed 7-0 to table the item until further information can be
presented.
C. Strauss Residence, 30 SE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District,
Michael Strauss, Owner.
Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is re-
consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
-2- HPB Minutes 2/5/03
replacement of existing windows with aluminum frame windows on
all elevations, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
A supplemental memo was submitted to the Board by Staff to
expand on the applicant's request for re-consideration. Ms. Shay
requested that the Board read the memo at this time in order to
better understand the applicant's request.
Ms. Shay entered the project file (including the supplemental
memo) into record and presented the proposed project. The
applicant received previous approval by the Board for the
installation of wood core, vinyl clad windows on the front elevation
of the house and aluminum frame windows on the remaining
elevation which are out of view from the right-of-way. The applicant
is back before the Board for re-consideration of installation of
impact resistant, single hung sash, aluminum frame windows on all
elevations, including along the front elevation due to an economic
hardship.
Mr. Strauss was present to represent the project.
Ms. Jamison inquired about which windows meet code.
Ms. Shay stated that vinyl clad, wood core windows may meet code
upon request for review. Otherwise, aluminum windows are the
only type to meet code.
Mr. Perez inquired about.which brand of window is proposed for
installation.
Ms. Shay thought that the contractor and the building permit stated
Anderson windows.
Ms. McDermott asked about the light configuration.
Ms. Shay stated that the window must resemble a divided light
window in a 4/1 or 6/1 configuration. She also stated that Staffs
concern is the molding profile of the sash and mullion.
Mr. Strauss stated that the lack of windows in the house has
become a code enforcement issue.
Ms. Shay stated that based on his request to the Board that the
violations may be waived or reduced.
Mr. Perez stated that he would like to see the actual windows.
-3- HPB Minutes 2/5/03
Mr. Strauss stated that he could not be present to show the
windows to the Board due to time constraints related to his job.
Ms. Shay stated that the window contractor could present samples.
After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by
Mr. Perez and passed 6-1 (Jamison dissenting) to approve the
Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of aluminum frame
windows on all elevations for the contributing building at 30 SE 1st
Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section
4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(c) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines.
D. Crocker Residence, 105 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District,
Kathleen Crocker, Owner.
Ms. Crocker was sworn in.
Action Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that
of making a recommendation to the City's Commission regarding a
COA for Part II of an ad valorem tax exemption for improvements to
a contributing building in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant
to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
Mr. Perez recused himself.
Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the
proposed project. The project, previously approved by the Board,
included elevation improvements and an addition to a contributing
dwelling and associated site improvements including fencing and
construction of a driveway.
Ms. Crocker was present to represent the project.
It was moved by Ms. Elliott, seconded by Ms. McDermott and
passed 6-0 to recommend to the City Commission approval of Part
II of the Tax Exemption Application, the Final Application Request
for Review of Completed Work for site improvements at the
Crocker Residence, 105 NE 7th Street, based upon positive
findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(M)(5)(a)(iii), (M)(5)(b)
and (M)(11), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
At this time, the agenda was amended to add the Milton-Myers
Legion Post to the agenda as the item was unintentionally omitted
from the agenda by staff. It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by
Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0.
E. Milton-Myers Legion Post No. 65, 263 NE 5th Avenue, Individually Listed
Property, Scott Schley, Authorized Agent.
-4- HPB Minutes 2/5/03
The action before the Board is a recommendation to the City
Commission to approve a $50,000 rehabilitation matching grant
from the City of Delray Beach for the structural stabilization of the
Milton-Myers American Legion Post No. 65. Pursuant to LDR
Section 2.2.6(D)(10), the Board shall make recommendations to the
City Commission concerning the use of grants from federal and
state agencies, and the use of City funds to promote the
preservation and conservation of historically and aesthetically
significant archaeological sites, historic sites, and historic districts.
The applicant is requesting a matching grant in the amount of
$50,000 for the first phase of the restoration of the building. Due to
the severe deterioration of the building, funding is necessary in
order to shore up the walls, stabilize the masonry footings, re-grout
masonry, re-pointing, and exterior stucco repair. The applicant will
seek the remainder of the funding necessary for phase II of the
restoration from addition resources.
Ms. McDermott stepped down and was sworn in to represent the
project.
It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 6-
0 to recommend to the City Commission approval of the
rehabilitation matching grant funds in the amount of $50,000 for
263 NE 5th Avenue, the Milton-Myers American Legion Post No.
65, subject to the following condition:
1) That a grant agreement approved by the City Attorney's Office
and the City Commission be entered into by the
owner/applicant.
Ms. McDermott returned to the Board
III. DISCUSSION ITEM
A. Recommendation for an exterior paint change for the Old School Square
Complex.
Ms. Shay stated that a paint analysis was being completed in order
to determine the original colors of both the Cornell Museum and the
Crest Theatre. Once the results are submitted, the item will be
returned to the Board to decide. Initial results show a gold hue for
the body of both buildings.
Ms. Shay further showed the Board photos of storm protection
screens. The screens are proposed by the City as an alternative to
-5- HPB Minutes 2/5/03
removable storm panels. The screens would remain in place
throughout the hurricane season.
Ms. Shay expressed her concern with the snap on muntins. The
muntins are not in proportion and should be corrected prior to
installation. Further, the screens will be painted to match the
building or window frames to aid in concealing the screens.
The Board concurred with the issue of the muntins and frames in
that they should be evenly distributed prior to installation. The
Board unanimously agreed that storm protection is imperative and
that the screens are adequate to protect the building.
IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Public Comments:
None
B. Report from Historic District Representatives:
None
C. Board Members:
Mr. Branning inquired about the design guidelines draft review.
Ms. Shay inquired about availability of the Board members to
schedule the next meeting.
The Board settled on the date of Monday, March 3, 2003 at 6 P.M.
D. Staff:
Ms. Shay stated that revisions to the LDR Section 4.5.1(M) for the
Tax Abatements will soon be coming before the Board for
recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board.
V. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:00
P.M.
The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for
February 5, 2003, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on
May 7, 2003.
-6- HPB Minutes 2/5/03
If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then
this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after
review and approval, which may involve some changes.
-7- HPB Minutes 2/5/03
.<4 qt. AGENDA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
v, wP BOARD MEETING
4'4y �� CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
Meeting Date: February 5, 2003
Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting
Location: First Floor Conference Room
Time: 6:00 P.M.
The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a
disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity
conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior
to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening
devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any
matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for
this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such
record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide
or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS
A. Patrick Lynch Property, 226 South Ocean Boulevard, Nassau Park Historic
District, Roger Cope, Authorized Agent.
Consider a recommendation to the City Commission for Part II of the tax
abatement for improvements to a contributing historic property.
B. Crocker Residence, 105 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Kathleen
Crocker, Owner.
Consider a recommendation to the City Commission for Part ll of the tax
abatement for improvements to a contributing historic property.
C. The Rectory, 14 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District,
Dharma Holdings Limited, Authorized Agent.
Consider a certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign.
D. Strauss Residence, 30 SE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District,
Michael Strauss, Owner.
Reconsideration of a COA request for installation of aluminum windows on a
contributing building.
III. DISCUSSION ITEM
A. Recommendation for an exterior paint change for the Old School Square Complex
HPB Meeting
February 5, 2003
Page 2
IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Public Comments
B. Reports from Historic District Representatives
C. Board Members
D. Staff
V. ADJOURN
L1,\(� L4
Wendy Shay, His ric Preset tion Planner
POSTED ON: January 31, 2003
MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PUBLIC H E A R I N G
MEETING DATE: February 5, 2003
LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
I. ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:03 P.M. Upon roll call it
was determined that a quorum was present.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott,
Jim Keavney, William Branning, Francisco Perez-
Azua (arrived 6:09), Rhonda Sexton (arrived 6:12)
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Loretta Heussi
II. CERTIFICATES OF APPRORIATENESS
Ms. Jamison read the quasi-judicial regulations. Ms. Heussi swore in all those
wishing to speak.
A. Patrick Lynch Property, 226 South Ocean Boulevard, Nassau Park
Historic District, Roger Cope, Authorized Agent.
Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is a
Certificate of Appropriateness associated with Part II of the Tax
Exemption Application for the Patrick Lynch Residence, pursuant to
LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication by the Board.
No ex-parte communication took place.
Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the
proposed project. The project included elevation changes and an
addition to a contributing dwelling and new construction including a
new two-story dwelling, installation of walkways, and related site
improvements to the associated property which were previously
approved by the Board.
Mr. Cope was present to represent the project on behalf of the
applicant. Mr. Cope inquired about the expenditures for the
landscaping, pool construction, and fencing.
Ms. Shay stated that fencing was permitted.
After much discussion, it was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded
by Ms. Elliott and passed 5-0 to recommend to the City
Commission approval of Part II of the Tax Exemption Application,
the Final Application Request for Review of Completed Work for
site improvements at the Patrick Lynch Property, 226 South
Ocean Boulevard based upon positive findings with respect to
LDR Sections 4.5.1(M)(5)(a)(iii), (M)(5)(b) and (M)(11), the City's
Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation.
At this time, the agenda was amended to move item II.B. to the end
of the agenda as the applicant was expected but not yet present. It
was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed
7-0 to move item II.B. to the end of the agenda.
B. The Rectory, 14 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic
District, Dharma Holdings Limited, Authorized Agent.
Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is a
Certificate of Appropriateness and associated waiver for the
installation of a free-standing sign for The Rectory, pursuant to LDR
Section 2.4.6(J) and 2.4.7(B).
Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the
proposed project.
Mr. Tamorina was present to represent the project.
After much discussion, the item was tabled until such time as the
applicant submits more detailed information regarding the sign's
paint colors, dimensions, and text. The Board further directed the
applicant to construct a border around the sign to enhance its
definition.
It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Mr. Perez and
passed 7-0 to table the item until further information can be
presented.
C. Strauss Residence, 30 SE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District,
Michael Strauss, Owner.
Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is re-
consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
replacement of existing windows with aluminum frame windows on
all elevations, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
-2- HPB Minutes 2/5/03
A supplemental memo was submitted to the Board by Staff to
expand on the applicant's request for re-consideration. Ms. Shay
requested that the Board read the memo at this time in order to
better understand the applicant's request.
Ms. Shay entered the project file (including the supplemental
memo) into record and presented the proposed project. The
applicant received previous approval by the Board for the
installation of wood core, vinyl clad windows on the front elevation
of the house and aluminum frame windows on the remaining
elevation which are out of view from the right-of-way. The applicant
is back before the Board for re-consideration of installation of
impact resistant, single hung sash, aluminum frame windows on all
elevations, including along the front elevation due to an economic
hardship.
Mr. Strauss was present to represent the project.
Ms. Jamison inquired about which windows meet code.
Ms. Shay stated that vinyl clad, wood core windows may meet code
upon request for review. Otherwise, aluminum windows are the
only type to meet code.
Mr. Perez inquired about which brand of window is proposed for
installation.
Ms. Shay thought that the contractor and the building permit stated
Anderson windows.
Ms. McDermott asked about the light configuration.
Ms. Shay stated that the window must resemble a divided light
window in a 4/1 or 6/1 configuration. She also stated that Staffs
concern is the molding profile of the sash and mullion.
Mr. Strauss stated that the lack of windows in the house has
become a code enforcement issue.
Ms. Shay stated that based on his request to the Board that the
violations may be waived or reduced.
Mr. Perez stated that he would like to see the actual windows.
Mr. Strauss stated that he could not be present to show the
windows to the Board due to time constraints related to his job.
-3- HPB Minutes 2/5/03
Ms. Shay stated that the window contractor could present samples.
After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by
Mr. Perez and passed 6-1 (Jamison dissenting) to approve the
Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of aluminum frame
windows on all elevations for the contributing building at 30 SE 1st
Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section
4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(c) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines.
D. Crocker Residence, 105 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District,
Kathleen Crocker, Owner.
Ms. Crocker was sworn in.
Action Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that
of making a recommendation to the City's Commission regarding a
COA for Part II of an ad valorem tax exemption for improvements to
a contributing building in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant
to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
Mr. Perez recused himself.
Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the
proposed project. The project, previously approved by the Board,
included elevation improvements and an addition to a contributing
dwelling and associated site improvements including fencing and
construction of a driveway.
Ms. Crocker was present to represent the project.
It was moved by Ms. Elliott, seconded by Ms. McDermott and
passed 6-0 to recommend to the City Commission approval of Part
II of the Tax Exemption Application, the Final Application Request
for Review of Completed Work for site improvements at the
Crocker Residence, 105 NE 7th Street, based upon positive
findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(M)(5)(a)(iii), (M)(5)(b)
and (M)(11), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
At this time, the agenda was amended to add the Milton-Myers
Legion Post to the agenda as the item was unintentionally omitted
from the agenda by staff. It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by
Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0.
E. Milton-Myers Legion Post No. 65, 263 NE 5th Avenue, Individually Listed
Property, Scott Schley, Authorized Agent.
The action before the Board is a recommendation to the City
Commission to approve a $50,000 rehabilitation matching grant
-4- HPB Minutes 2/5/03
from the City of Delray Beach for the structural stabilization of the
Milton-Myers American Legion Post No. 65. Pursuant to LDR
Section 2.2.6(D)(10), the Board shall make recommendations to the
City Commission concerning the use of grants from federal and
state agencies, and the use of City funds to promote the
preservation and conservation of historically and aesthetically
significant archaeological sites, historic sites, and historic districts.
The applicant is requesting a matching grant in the amount of
$50,000 for the first phase of the restoration of the building. Due to
the severe deterioration of the building, funding is necessary in
order to shore up the walls, stabilize the masonry footings, re-grout
masonry, re-pointing, and exterior stucco repair. The applicant will
seek the remainder of the funding necessary for phase II of the
restoration from addition resources.
Ms. McDermott stepped down and was sworn in to represent the
project.
It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 6-
0 to recommend to the City Commission approval of the
rehabilitation matching grant funds in the amount of $50,000 for
263 NE 5th Avenue, the Milton-Myers American Legion Post No.
65, subject to the following condition:
1) That a grant agreement approved by the City Attorney's Office
and the City Commission be entered into by the
owner/applicant.
Ms. McDermott returned to the Board
III. DISCUSSION ITEM
A. Recommendation for an exterior paint change for the Old School Square
Complex.
Ms. Shay stated that a paint analysis was being completed in order
to determine the original colors of both the Cornell Museum and the
Crest Theatre. Once the results are submitted, the item will be
returned to the Board to decide. Initial results show a gold hue for
the body of both buildings.
Ms. Shay further showed the Board photos of storm protection
screens. The screens are proposed by the City as an alternative to
removable storm panels. The screens would remain in place
throughout the hurricane season.
-5- HPB Minutes 2/5/03
Ms. Shay expressed her concern with the snap on muntins. The
muntins are not in proportion and should be corrected prior to
installation. Further, the screens will be painted to match the
building or window frames to aid in concealing the screens.
The Board concurred with the issue of the muntins and frames in
that they should be evenly distributed prior to installation. The
Board unanimously agreed that storm protection is imperative and
that the screens are adequate to protect the building.
IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Public Comments:
None
B. Report from Historic District Representatives:
None
C. Board Members:
Mr. Branning inquired about the design guidelines draft review.
Ms. Shay inquired about availability of the Board members to
schedule the next meeting.
The Board settled on the date of Monday, March 3, 2003 at 6 P.M.
D. Staff:
Ms. Shay stated that revisions to the LDR Section 4.5.1(M) for the
Tax Abatements will soon be coming before the Board for
recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board.
V. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:00
P.M.
The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for
February 5, 2003, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on
May 7, 2003.
If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then
this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after
review and approval, which may involve some changes.
-6- HPB Minutes 2/5/03
SIGN IN SHEET
Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting of
FEBRUARY 5, 2003
PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ORGANIZATION ITEM
ti� . C1 Qv 70 ,-6 l7 A-vs D
(t IQJ aRCA'i(rgeirc 4 I V\1
- --0 c A6 GLA'� .f ! ( cif- S_, �,. `,. 0 r� 'ma /6'61- ZIT
\ c1 Clc c r- /OS 1) ' }reeT
I
HII I
S
DELRAY BEACH - DELRAY BEACH
tittd.
AB•AmereaCity
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
RII•A1mlicaCRy
bltd
�I MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT
1 J93 - 1903
2001 2001
Agent: Roger Cope, Authorized Agent
Project Name: Patrick Lynch Property
Project Location: 226 South Ocean Boulevard
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with Part II of
the Tax Exemption Application for the Patrick Lynch Residence, pursuant to LDR
Section 2.4.6(J).
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Nassau Street and S. Ocean
Boulevard within the Nassau Park Historic District. The property encompasses the
south 21.65' of Lot 1, all of Lot 2 and the east 35' of Lot 3, Nassau Park subdivision and
consists of 0.41 acres.
The main house, located on the south side of the property, was constructed in 1936.
The construction date of the guest cottage is unknown, however City records indicate
that it was constructed prior to 1949. Both structures were built in the Resort Cottage
style of the 1930's and are contributing from a historical perspective. The house was a
winter residence for Mr. and Mrs. John G. Cherry of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and was one
of the first houses in the Nassau Park subdivision.
On November 7, 2000, the Historic Preservation Board approved a Certificate of
Appropriateness and associated Class II site plan modification for the Construction of a
2nd floor addition on the guest house (north building) and conversion of the structure
from an illegally converted duplex to a single family dwelling; construction of a one story
addition on the main house (south building); construction of a pool and deck on the east
side of the property; construction of a 4'-3' high masonry wall on the south and east
sides of the property; and, installation of associated landscaping. Variances to reduce
the front and side setbacks pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K)were also approved.
During the meeting of June 20, 2001, the Board approved COA 428A, for the addition of
decorative shutters to the windows. The Board approved the shutters noting several
locations where the dimensions of the shutters needed modification, and requiring that
hardware associated with the shutters be added.
On August 1, 2001, the HPB approved minor elevation changes and a pre-construction
application for an ad valorum tax exemption. The associated improvements are
currently under construction.
Meeting Date: February 5, 2003
Agenda Item: IIIA.
Patrick Lynch Residence
Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Part II
Page 2
During the Board meeting on January 16, 2002, the Board reviewed and approved the
construction of a cricketed gable entrance with four support posts separate from the
structure on the front façade of the rear cottage.
PROJECT DECSRPTION/ANALYSIS
Project Description
The project under consideration for the tax abatement consists of various site
improvements including:
➢ Conversion of a single story guest house into a two-story dwelling;
➢ Construction of a rear addition on the historic main residence;
➢ Reconfiguration and installation of a new entry wall and gate along the south side
of the property and Nassau Street;
➢ Construction of a new entrance on the south side of the historic main dwelling;
➢ Construction of a gable entrance and door on the maid's quarters/guest cottage;
➢ Installation of new asphalt shingle roofs on all related buildings;
➢ Installation of paver block walkways and driveway;
➢ Construction of a pool; and,
➢ Installation of associated landscaping.
Ad Valorum Standards for Qualifying Improvements
The property in question qualifies for the tax exemption per LDR Section
4.5.1(M)(5)(a)(iii) as it is designated as a historic property, or as contributing
property to a historic district, under the terms of the City's historic preservation
ordinance.
Once established as a qualified historic property, qualifying improvements, pursuant to
LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b), must meet the following criterion:
(i) Be consistent with the United States Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended;
(ii) Be determined by the Historic Preservation Board to meet criteria
established in rules adopted by the Department of State, Division of
Historical Resources, FAC 1A-38, as amended;
(iii) Be consistent with Section 4.5.1 (E), "Development Standards" of the
City's Land Development Regulations; and,
(iv) Include as part of the overall project, visible improvements to the
exterior of the structure.
Patrick Lynch Residence
Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Part II
Page 3
Analysis
The project meets criterion (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) regarding the new construction and
alterations to the existing historic buildings (with the exception of the landscaping) as
both were reviewed for compliance under the City's Land development Regulations, the
Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
for Rehabilitation, and were found to meet the standards set forth in each.
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(11), Part II, the "Final Application/ Request for
Review of Completed Work" was submitted when the work was completed. The Final
Application includes documentation of all costs incurred during the project, the
restrictive covenant, all related AIA forms, and the approved building permit application
listing the cost of the work performed. The City's Community Improvement Department
has verified that the work has been completed and a certificate of Occupancy was
issued on April 6, 2002.
As mandated by LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(11), the Historic Preservation Board will review
the Final Application to determine whether the completed improvements are in
compliance with the pre-construction application. The Board will also determine those
improvements that are not eligible for the tax credit, because they are not specifically
related to the rehabilitation of the building(s)/property. The associated landscaping for
the project is not considered a legitimate improvement under the specifications
mandated by the State for the tax abatement. It has therefore not been included in the
expenditures total. Taking this into account, the legitimate site improvements
expenditures total $327,542.76
The Historic Preservation Board's recommendation of Part II of the application will be
forwarded to the City Commission for final action. The project must be approved by the
City Commission in order to be forwarded to the Palm Beach County Property
Appraiser's Office and the Planning & Zoning Department for recordation.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
A. Continue with direction.
B. Approve the COA associated with Part II of the Tax Exemption Application for the
226 South Ocean Boulevard, Patrick Lynch Property, based on positive findings
with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(M)(5)(a)(iii), (M)(5)(b), and (M)(11), the City's
Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation
subject to conditions.
C. Deny the COA associated with Part II of the Tax Exemption Application for the 226
South Ocean Boulevard, Patrick Lynch Property, with the basis stated.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend to the City Commission approval of Part II of the Tax Exemption
Application, the Final Application Request for Review of Completed Work for site
Patrick Lynch Residence
Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Part II
Page 4
improvements at the Patrick Lynch Property, 226 South Ocean Boulevard based
upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(M)(5)(a)(iii), (M)(5)(b) and
(M)(11), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation.
Attachments:Part ll Tax Exemption Application
Staff Report Prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner
OEERAY BEAp DEERAY.BEACH
kritd
AB-Amedheal HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD AB-AmefireCdY
�II� MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT 1IIJ,
1993 1993
2001 2001
Agent: Kathleen Crocker, Owner
Project Name: Crocker Residence Ad Valorum Tax Exemption Part II
Project Location: 105 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The action requested of the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City's
Commission regarding a COA for an ad valorem tax exemption for improvements to a
contributing building in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section
2.4.6(J).
BACKGROUND
The residence at 105 NE 7th Street was constructed in 1941 and is considered a
contributing building within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The subject property is
located on the north side of NE 7th Street, between North Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd
Avenue, and is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). The property consists of two
lots with a total frontage of 100' and a depth of 120'. Previously, the lots contained a
two bedroom, two bathroom 1,211 sq. ft. house, as well as a detached one story garage
at the northwest corner of the property. Over the years a number of alterations have
occurred the most obvious is the enclosure of the front porch with a series of jalousie
windows.
In August 2001, a COA application was submitted for the property. The proposal
included the demolition of the one car garage with a modification to the extant dwelling,
construction of a two-story 1,583 sq. ft. addition (resulting in a 2,794 sq. ft. air-
conditioned space), improvements to the original, one-story historic dwelling,
construction of a swimming pool, and various site improvements such as installation of
Chicago brick paver walkways, deck, and driveway and installation of a fence and gate.
During its meeting of July 17, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and
approved Part I of the Tax Exemption Application. The applicant is now before the
Board for a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for Part II of the Tax
Exemption Application.
Meeting Date: February 5, 2003
Agenda Item: II.B.
Crocker Residence
Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Part II
Page 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS
Project Description
The project under consideration for the tax abatement consists of various site
improvements including:
➢ Construction of the two-story addition;
➢ Elevation improvements to the historic one-story main dwelling;
➢ Construction of a swimming pool;
➢ Installation of a perimeter fence and gate;
➢ Demolition of the garage;
➢ Installation of Chicago brick walkways, deck, and driveway; and,
➢ Installation of associated landscaping.
Ad Valorum Standards for Qualifying Improvements
The property in question qualifies for the tax exemption per LDR Section
4.5.1(M)(5)(a)(iii) as it is designated as a historic property, or as contributing
property to a historic district, under the terms of the City's historic preservation
ordinance.
Once established as a qualified historic property, qualifying improvements, pursuant to
LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b), must meet the following criterion:
(i) Be consistent with the United States Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended;
(ii) Be determined by the Historic Preservation Board to meet criteria
established in rules adopted by the Department of State, Division of
Historical Resources, FAC 1A-38, as amended;
(iii) Be consistent with Section 4.5.1 (E), "Development Standards" of the
City's Land Development Regulations; and,
(iv) Include as part of the overall project, visible improvements to the
exterior of the structure.
Analysis
The project meets criterion (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) regarding the new construction and
alterations to the existing historic buildings (with the exception of the landscaping) as
both were reviewed for compliance under the City's Land development Regulations, the
Historic Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation and were found to meet the standards set forth in each upon approval.
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(11), Part II, the "Final Application/ Request for
Review of Completed Work" was submitted when the work was completed. The Final
Application includes documentation of all costs incurred during the project, the
I Crocker Residence
Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Part II
Page 3
restrictive covenant, all related AIA forms, and the approved building permit application
listing the cost of the work performed.
As mandated by LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(11), the Historic Preservation Board will review
the Final Application to determine whether the completed improvements are in
compliance with the pre-construction application. The Board will also determine those
improvements that are not eligible for the tax credit, because they are not specifically
related to the rehabilitation of the building(s)/property. The associated landscaping for
the project is not considered a legitimate improvement under the specifications
mandated by the State for the tax abatement. It has therefore not been included in the
expenditures total. Taking this into account, the legitimate site improvements
expenditures total $356,117.54.
Following the Historic Preservation Board's approval of Part II of the application, the
matter will be forwarded to the City Commission for final approval. The project must be
approved by the City Commission in order to be forwarded to the Palm Beach County
Property Appraiser's Office for recordation.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
A. Continue with direction.
B. Approve the COA associated with Part II of the Tax Exemption Application for the
Crocker Residence, 105 NE 7th Street, based on positive findings with respect to
LDR Sections 4.5.1(M)(5)(a)(iii), (M)(5)(b), and (M)(11), the City's Design
Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to
conditions.
C. Deny the COA associated with Part II of the Tax Exemption Application for the
Crocker residence, 105 NE 7th Street, with the basis stated.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend to the City Commission approval of Part II of the Tax Exemption
Application, the Final Application Request for Review of Completed Work for site
improvements at the Crocker Residence, 105 NE 7th Street, based upon positive
findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(M)(5)(a)(iii), (M)(5)(b) and (M)(11), the
City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation.
Attachments:Part Il Tax Exemption Application
Staff Report Prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner
DEEBAY ACH DELRAI'BEACH
All-Ame�icaGtr
tadtiliri
BE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD AlAmmicaCBy
MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT (II/r
7993 1993
20O-I 2OO1
Agent: Dharma Holdings Limited
Project Name: The Rectory
Project Location: 14 South Swinton Avenue
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated waiver
for the installation of a free-standing sign for The Rectory, pursuant to LDR Section
2.4.6(J) and 2.4.7(B).
BACKGROUND
The subject property consists of Lot 11, Block 61, Town of Delray and is located on the
west side of South Swinton Avenue approximately 80' south of Atlantic Avenue. The
property is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). Constructed in
1912 as the Rectory for the City's first Methodist Church, the two-story frame vernacular
building is considered a contributing property as a part of the Old School Square
Historic District.
During its meeting of October 15, 1997, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and
approved the site plan and design elements (including the installation of a handicapped
accessible parking space) for the rehabilitation of the Rectory Building. This proposal
included the construction of an ADA accessible ramp at the rear of the property.
Relocation of the ramp to the front of the building was reviewed and approved by the
Board on February 18, 1998.
On July 1, 1998, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved the Certificate
of Appropriateness (COA 327) for an exterior paint change, change of roof material, and
installation of shutters. The proposed improvements were undertaken.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant proposes the installation of a free standing sign for a retail establishment.
The proposed sign will be constructed of urethane intended to mimic the look of carved
wood to compliment the building. The sign will be painted/stained a dark brown with
pink text (all caps) and starburst logo. Located at the southeast corner along the front
façade of the building, the sign will be oriented to face South Swinton Avenue with text
The Rectory 2003-080-COA
14 South Swinton Avenue
on one side only. The free standing sign measures 68" (5'8") in width with a 36" (3') high
sign body and 72" (8') height including the decorative support posts. The sign will be lit
from the ground with a separate spotlight.
A waiver is required in association with this project in order to permit the installation of
more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs within one lot, parcel, or
development pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7).
REVIEW BY OTHERS
The Delray Beach Sign Review Board reviewed and approved the location and sign
design and dimensions during its meeting of January 31, 2003.
ANALYSIS
The Board shall consider:
SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES
LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(1)(b) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Free-standing
signs"
A free-standing sign is not affixed to any other structure. It may be either a pole sign or
a monument sign. Neither the pole nor the base of the monument shall be considered in
calculation of the area of the sign face. A free-standing sign may not have more than
two faces.
LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and
states:
The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building
on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be
located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7).
LDR Section 4.6.7 (H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and
Standards"
The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially
affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to
the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the
mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following
aesthetic conditions must be met.
Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on
which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale
Meeting Date: February 5,2003
Agenda Item: II.C.
The Rectory 2003-080-COA
14 South Swinton Avenue
shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (E) with respect to height and
area.
Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be
garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring,
and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation.
Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the
building or in the immediate vicinity.
Design Guidelines
The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage:
Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important
element. While preservationists believe the building façade is the best sign an owner
may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them
to the particular character of the specific location and site.
The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption.
The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the
views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm
or compete with the architecture.
The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation
No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts,
however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character-
defining" and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to
new construction for historic structures and districts.
One such standard states:
New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy
historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be
differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale,
and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its
environment.
Waiver Analysis
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7), not more than one of any type of sign nor more
than two signs are permitted per lot, parcel, or development. While the applicant is
proposing to install more than one sign on this parcel, given the historic nature of the
property, the unique architectural style of each building on the parcel and design of
each sign, and that individual contributing buildings are utilized for separate business
establishments, positive findings can be made to support the recommendation to City
Meeting Date: February 5,2003
Agenda Item: II.C.
The Rectory 2003-080-COA
14 South Swinton Avenue
Commission for the waiver request for the installation of an additional sign on this
parcel.
Conclusion
The proposed signage conveys the identity and location of the establishment. The
design is appropriate in relation to the style and design in the area however, the scale of
the sign is disproportionate from the surrounding commercial signage and in relation to
the width of the building and may obscure significant architectural features. For
instance, the sign for Sweet Art by Lucila at 20 South Swinton Avenue, just south of the
Rectory Building, measures 81" (6'9") in height and 42" (3'6") in width. The signs height
and width should therefore be reduced in relation to the building's front façade. The
signs current measurements are inappropriate for this area and would be more
appropriate in a suburban setting or along a major roadway. Reduction of the sign's
height and width would retain the integrity of the scale of the building and the
surrounding built environment and would provide a more pedestrian friendly scale. The
sign height will be 68" (5'8") with an area of approximately 17 sq. ft. Per LDR Section
4.6.7(G)(3)(d), as the building is located within the Old School Square Historic Arts
District (OSSHAD), the sign may be placed within the front yard setback and meets the
standards for maximum sign height (12') and area (30 sq. ft.), per LDR Section
4.6.7(G)(7). Positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7, the City's Design
Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards can be made with conditional
approval upon the reduction of the scale of the sign.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
A. Continue with direction.
B. Approve the COA and the associated Class I site plan modification for the
installation of a sign for The Rectory, subject to conditions.
C. Deny the COA and associated Class I site plan modification for the installation of
a sign for The Rectory, with the basis stated.
RECOMMENDATION
Waiver Request
Recommend to the City Commission approval of the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7)
to permit more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs on one parcel
pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5) for the property at 14 South Swinton Avenue,
The Rectory.
Meeting Date: February 5,2003
Agenda Item: II.C.
The Rectory 2003-080-COA
14 South Swinton Avenue
Certificate of Appropriateness
Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign for 14 South
Swinton Avenue, The Rectory, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR
Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b) and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to the following condition:
1) That the body and/or posts of the sign be reduced in relation to the scale of the
building's front facade.
Attachments: Survey, Sign Details
Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner
Meeting Date: February 5,2003
Agenda Item: II.C.
•
DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH
kzted
aNal�werty �v
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD All-a �can
(IIJ , MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT JINN
1993 1993
2D01 2001 •
Agent: Michael Strauss
Project Name: 30 SE 1st Avenue
Project Location: Between SE 1st Street and Atlantic Avenue
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The item before the Board is reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
replacement of existing windows, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Located on Lot 19, Block 69 in the Town of Delray, the residence is a one-story dwelling located
on the west side of SE 1st Avenue, between Atlantic Avenue and SE 1st Street in the (OSSHAD)
Old School Square Historic Arts District zoning district (30 SE 1st Avenue). Designed in the
Mission Revival style, the 1,402 sq. ft. contributing building was constructed in 1925 and
expresses detailed architectural design with its curved parapet and textured stucco finish. The
residence is considered a contributing building in the Old School Square Historic District.
On November 20, 1996, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) approved the removal of the
existing jalousie windows and the installation of white aluminum single hung sash windows with
a 6/1 light configuration.
At its meeting of April 15, 1998, the HPB reviewed and approved the proposed conversion of the
single family home to offices. Associated with this project was a variance request to allow back
out parking into the alley (to the south) in order to eliminate the front yard parking space. These
approvals were valid for 18 months and neither the replacement of the windows nor the
conversion were completed.
On February 20, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a COA request for the
installation of aluminum frame windows on all elevations of the contributing dwelling. The review
was tabled by the Board until the meeting of March 20, 2003 in order for the applicant to gather
additional information regarding the cost prohibitive nature of installing all wood frame windows
as discussed during the meeting.
During its meeting of March 20, 2002, the Board reconsidered the installation of aluminum,
framed 6/1 and 4/1 windows in the 1925 Mission style house. Documentation was provided
indicating that the in-kind replacement of the solid wood windows would be cost prohibitive for
the applicant. Alternatives were recommended by the Board that included researching the cost
of installing vinyl clad wood core windows along the front façade of the structure with aluminum
framed windows on the remainder of the elevations, not viewed from the right-of-way. Further,
Meeting Date: February 5, 2003
Agenda Item: II.D.
HPB Staff Report
30 SE 1st Avenue—Reconsideration of windows
Page 2
the Board recommended the applicant research additional funding sources such as the Delray
Beach CRA loan program and possible Community Development grants. Therefore the item
was tabled.
On April 17, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed additional information pertaining to
the applicant's financial hardship and previous approvals of replacement windows within the
historic districts. It was suggested by Staff that the Board consider the installation of vinyl clad,
wood core windows along the front facade of the historic dwelling while permitting the
installation of aluminum frame windows on the remaining elevations. Based on the fact that the
Board had previously approved such window materials for installation on other historic buildings
and due to the excessive hardship imposed upon the applicant for the installation of wood frame
windows throughout the building, the Board approved this configuration for the dwelling at 30 SE
1st Avenue subject to the following condition:
That the windows on the front facade (as viewed from the right-of-way) must be vinyl
clad, wood core 6/1 or 4/1 SHS windows while the remainder of the windows on the side
and rear elevations may be replaced with 6/1 or 4/1 SHS, aluminum frame windows.
The applicant is now before the Board for reconsideration of this finding. Additional informational
will be presented by the applicant at the February 5, 2003 meeting. Further background
information is provided in the HPB staff report of March 20, 2002.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS
The applicant requests the reconsideration of the condition of approval imposed by the Board in
April 2002. The applicant requests approval of that installation of aluminum frame windows be
approved on each elevation including the front façade (east elevation). The applicant has
submitted a building permit application for approval of the aluminum frame, impact-resistant
windows and states that vinyl clad, wood core windows are not available by the manufacturer
and would not meet current wind load as required by the 2002 Florida Building Code. Wood
core, aluminum clad windows by an alternate manufacturer (Pella Windows) have been
approved which comply with the current building code and meet wind load requirements
however, they are not impact resistant. Staff recommends the installation of such windows that
are non-impact resistant on the front façade only and that the applicant provide alternative storm
protection for those windows to uphold the previous condition of approval by the Board and
maintain the historic nature per LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c) and (E)(8)(g) and the City's
Design Guidelines which states that historic buildings shall "maintain the original size, shape,
and paning as well as the wood trim as it determined the rhythm of solids and voids."
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
A. Continue with direction.
B. Approve the COA for the installation of aluminum frame windows on all elevations for the
property at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to Section LDR
Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines.
HPB Staff Report
30 SE 1st Avenue—Reconsideration of windows
Page 3
C. Approve the COA for the installation of wood core windows with vinyl cladding on the front
façade only and aluminum frame windows along the remainder of the elevations not visible
from the right-of-way for the property at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with
respect to Section LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach
Design Guidelines.
D. Deny the COA for 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon a failure to make positive findings with
respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), the Delray Beach Design
Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness request to remove the existing jalousie
and awning windows and install new 6/1 and 4/1 single hung sash windows for the contributing
structure at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section
4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(c) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines with the following condition:
1) Install 6/1 and 4/1 SHS, wood core windows with vinyl cladding on the front (east)
elevation (seen from the right-of-way) and install aluminum frame 6/1 and 4/1, SHS
windows on the north, south, and west elevations.
Attachments: HPB Staff report 3.20.02
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT
Agent: Michael Strauss
Project Name: 30 SE 1st Avenue
Project Location: Between SE 1st Street and Atlantic Avenue
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The item before the Board is reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
replacement of existing windows, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Background
On November 20, 1996, the Historic Preservation Board approved the removal of the existing
jalousie windows and the installation of white aluminum single hung sash windows with a 6/1 lite
configuration in conjunction with the site plan to convert the 1925 Mission style residence to an
office. This approval was valid for 18 months, however, the replacement of the windows and
associated improvements was never completed and the approval expired.
At the meeting of February 20, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed the COA request
to replace the existing jalousie and awning windows with new 6/1 and 4/1 DHS windows. Upon
review of the request, the Board considered the applicant's proposal to replace the existing
windows with aluminum frame windows. The applicant requested consideration of the aluminum
due to the fact that replacement in—kind with wood framed windows would be cost prohibitive.
Previous deliberation by the Board regarding this matter included the review of aluminum
windows with impact glass along Banker's Row. On February 2, 2000, the Board approved the
use of aluminum windows on those elevations that are not along the front façade on a case by
case basis. However, any windows or doors replaced within view of the right-of-way must be
done in-kind with wood frames and similar muntin profiles.
Design Elements Analysis
LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g) "Development Standards"
provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or
addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows:
A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district
shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in
accordance to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time
to time.
Meeting Date: March 20, 2002
Agenda Item: II.G.
HPB Staff Report
30 SE 1st Avenue—Reconsideration of windows
Page 2
The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the
openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The
relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among
buildings within the district shall be visually compatible.
All improvements to building, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district
shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in
relation to materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building in association with the
predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district.
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states:
The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic
materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.
Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of
deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in
design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials.
The applicant will provide information to the Board at its meeting regarding the cost and details
of the windows. Further research by Staff has found several alternatives to the proposed
aluminum windows. The alternatives include 6/1 and 4/1 DHS solid wood windows by leading
window companies including Pella and Anderson and wood core windows with vinyl coverings.
These alternatives appear more economically feasible and will support the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation to replace all historic materials in-kind. Additional
information will be available at the meeting.
Conclusion
An alternative material to the aluminum framed windows proposed may be a more cost effective
solution while achieving the original intent of the Board to replace all historic materials in-kind.
One such alternative is to install aluminum windows on all elevations not visible from the right-
of-way with wood windows on the front façade only. Another alternative would be to install wood
core windows with vinyl cladding on the exterior. Further review of the applicant's request and
alternatives from Staff could determine a reasonable solution to replacing the windows and
retaining the historic integrity of the structure while keeping the project economically feasible.
The final project must be consistent with LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), the
City Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
A. Continue with direction.
B. Approve the COA for the installation of wood core windows with vinyl cladding for the
property at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to Section LDR
Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines.
,
•
HPB Staff Report
30 SE 1st Avenue—Reconsideration of windows
Page 3
C. Approve the COA for the installation of wood windows on the front façade only and
aluminum frame windows along the remainder of the elevations not visible from the right-of-
way for the property at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to
Section LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design
Guidelines.
D. Deny the COA for 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon a failure to make positive findings with
respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), the Delray Beach Design
Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
RECOMMENDATION
Board's discretion.
Attachments: Elevations, Site Plan
DEFRAY BEACH DEFRAY BEACH
bitd
pll•AaiericaCih All•AmelicaCih
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
IIIP,. SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT 11
IIP,,
7993 1993
2001 2001
Agent: Michael Strauss
Project Name: 30 SE 1st Avenue
Project Location: Between SE 1st Street and Atlantic Avenue
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The item before the Board is reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
replacement of existing windows, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS
The applicant requests the reconsideration of the condition of approval imposed by the Board in
April 2002 which stated that wood core, vinyl clad windows be installed on the front facade of
the historic dwelling with single hung sash, aluminum frame windows along the remaining
facades. Based on further research and analysis by Staff, the following information has been
compiled:
• Major manufacturers such as Pella, Anderson, Pozzi, PGT, and Hurd do not manufacture
wood frame or wood core, vinyl clad single hung sash windows which meet the 2001
Florida Building Code and the 140 mph wind load;
• Vinyl clad, wood core, double hung sash windows do not have product approval but
may be approved by the City upon certification by the manufacturer's engineers;
• Aluminum clad, wood core windows (both double hung and casement windows) hold
product approvals and meet the current Florida Building Code standards; and,
• No vinyl or aluminum clad, wood core, double hung sash windows are produced with
impact resistant glass and require the installation of shutters.
Based on the above data, the Board has the option of requiring solid wood, divided light
windows on the front façade, aluminum or vinyl clad, wood core windows, or aluminum frame
divided light windows on the front façade only. However, if the Board chooses vinyl clad, wood
core windows, the applicant must procure documentation from the window manufacturer's
engineer stating that the proposed wood core, vinyl clad windows meet the 2001 Florida
Building Code and required 140 mph wind loads in lieu of the product approval for consideration
by the Delray Beach Building Department.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
A. Continue with direction.
Meeting Date: February 5, 2003
Agenda Item: II.D.
HPB Staff Report
30 SE 1st Avenue—Reconsideration of windows
Page 2
B. Approve the COA for the installation of aluminum frame windows on all elevations for the
property at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to Section LDR
Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines.
C. Approve the COA for the installation of wood core windows with vinyl or aluminum cladding
on the front façade only and aluminum frame windows along the remainder of the elevations
not visible from the right-of-way for the property at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive
findings with respect to Section LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), and the
Delray Beach Design Guidelines.
D. Approve the COA for the installation of wood frame windows on the front façade only and
aluminum frame windows along the remainder of the elevations not visible from the right-of-
way for the property at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to
Section LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design
Guidelines.
E. Deny the COA for 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon a failure to make positive findings with
respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), the Delray Beach Design
Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
RECOMMENDATION
Board's discretion.
DEFRAY BEACH DEFRAY BEACH
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
� � MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT liI�.,.
Project Name: The Milton-Myers American Legion Post No. 65
Project Location: 263 NE 5th Avenue
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The action before the Board is the recommendation for $50,000 in rehabilitation
matching grant funds from the City of Delray Beach for the structural stabilization of the
Milton-Myers American Legion Post No. 65. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(D)(10), the
Board shall make recommendations to the City Commission concerning the use of
grants from federal and state agencies, and the use of City funds to promote the
preservation and conservation of historically and aesthetically significant archaeological
sites, historic sites, and historic districts.
BACKGROUND:.
The subject property consists of Lot 5 (less the west 5' of the road right-of-way), Block
106 of the Town of Delray and is located on the east side of South Federal Highway
(NE 5th Avenue). Constructed in 1921, the one-story, public Mission-Revival building is
considered a contributing, individually listed historic property in the Local Register of
Historic Places.
On August 3, 1994, the Historic Preservation Board recommended approval of the
individual listing for the Milton-Myers American Legion Post. Ordinance 68-94,
establishing the listing, was subsequently approved by the City Commission on
September 27, 1994. The building was listed in the National Register of Historic Places
on April 20, 1995.
In 1996, the Legion was awarded a $30,000 Small Matching Grant from the Florida
Division of Historical Resources for the rehabilitation of the building. In 1997, a total of
$90,000 was invested to stabilize the foundation, trusses, and roof however, the work
was not completed and the building has since suffered from continuing decay and
disrepair.
On August 20, 1997, the Board reviewed a COA request for exterior renovations
(referenced above) including the restoration/replacement of windows and installation of
shutters, replacement of the front entry door, addition of a new parapet, removal of
security bars, and the application of a new stucco finish where necessary.
Milton-Myers American Legion Post
263 NE 511'Avenue
The organization ordered a structural analysis in September 2002 which stated that
stabilization work on the building's façade, estimated at a cost of $156,530, is required
to allow public access back to the historic footprint of the building (west) outlined as
"exterior façade" restoration in the attached scope of work.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant requests consideration of a city funded matching grant in the amount of
$50,000 for the stabilization of the Milton Myers American Legion Post No. 65. The
building's west, north, and south facades have been deemed structurally unsound by an
engineering consultant and the rehabilitation of the building has been divided into
phases in order to permit public access to the historic part of the building. The initial
phase includes shoring up of the walls, stabilizing the masonry footings, re-grouting of
masonry, re-pointing, and exterior stucco repair. The initial phase of the rehabilitation is
estimated at $156,530 and is considered an essential phase for preserving the building.
Funds totaling $50,000 were granted by the Community Redevelopment Agency on
December 12, 2002 to aid in this initial phase of the rehabilitation project. The
American Legion is seeking alternative funding sources for the remainder of the
expenses involved with the rehabilitation including additional preservation grants.
CONCLUSION " -
The request for funds will provide the organization with adequate financial support for
phase I of the rehabilitation project to stabilize the historic building and to proceed with
the remaining phases of the rehabilitation. The historic section of the building is
currently uninhabitable and structurally unsound. Without access by the public, the
building has lost its historic and pragmatic integrity. Given the nature of the building and
its lack of structural stability as documented in the engineering report (attached) and as
the building holds significant ties to the community's heritage and to the organization's
community service, granting the requested funds in the amount of $50,000 can be
supported. Due to the nature of the grant and the work proposed, it is recommended
that the City enter into a grant award agreement to ensure that the work completed is in
accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and that the
work is protected from alteration for a period of no less than ten years. This has been
attached as a condition of approval.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
A. Continue with direction.
B. Recommend approval to the City Commission for the rehabilitation matching
grant funds in the amount of$50,000.00 for the Milton-Myers American Legion
Post No. 65, subject to conditions.
Meeting Date: February 5,2003
Agenda Item: III.A.
Milton-Myers American Legion Post
263 NE 5th Avenue
C. Recommend denial to the City Commission for the rehabilitation matching grant
funds for the Milton-Myers American Legion Post No. 65.
; RECOMMENDATION
Recommend to the City Commission approval of the rehabilitation matching grant funds
in the amount of $50,000.00 for 263 NE 5th Avenue, the Milton-Myers American
Legion Post No. 65, subject to the following condition:
1) That a grant agreement approved by the City Attorneys Office and the City
Commission be entered into by the owner/applicant.
Attachments: Request letter, engineering report
Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner
Meeting Date: February 5,2003
Agenda Item: III.A.
,— john e. gant. p.e.
consulting engineer
•
September 12, 2002
• Mr. Jim Smith
do American Legion Post 65
P.O. Box 1365
Delray Beach;•FL 33444
Re: Conceptual Building Repair
American Legion Post 65
This office was provided a set of drawings prepared by Kimberly A. Bellastatious, AIA dated •
1997. Site observations gave evidence to a partially completed project with some deviations from
the permitted drawings. It was then mutually decided that a conceptual repair outline was
needed for the Legion to solicit a preliminary cost estimate.
Leading up to this point, some non destructive testing was provided by Nutting Engineers and
Envirodyne for concrete core test and chloride analysis respectively. The chloride test results
are within acceptable limits, while the compressive test results of the two foundation cores
tested out low at 1900 psi (average) for this 1926 structure. It was further discovered in the
coring of the masonry pilasters, that these elements are non-reinforced masonry units. This
data, together with other field observations necessitates an overall building strengthening
program.
The following outline assumes the repair work to date is adequate, including but not limited to
anchorage of roof deck to truss repair, new truss/column support, and new shear wall at east
end of the high roof section. Some additional verification of work to date should be anticipated
for this project, in the absence of field reports and change order details. The outline together
with any materials therein is provided for cost estimating project only, and shall not be used for
construction which will require complete construction drawings.
Conceptual Repair Outline
Note:The work includes, but is not limited to the following outline
1. Brace and/or shore existing masonry walls and beams prior to repairs.
2. Repair west end masonry wall at high roof by replacing block in north
section for pre-demo opening of 9' and 3' door opening in south section.
Some jacking and grouting of cracked masonry is anticipated. Provide
masonry lintel over openings via saw cutting face shell and installing 1#7 top and
bottom continuous in 8" x 16" section in the absence of reinforced concrete beam.
Concrete grout strength fc'= 4000 psi should be assumed for the work.
•
post office box 1570 fort lauderdale, florida 33302-157(
• 3. Repair continuous footings cut at added steel columns. (8), by
drilling each side and set 1#5 top and bottom in,epoxy, clean, provide
bonding agent and cast repair. •
4. Stabilize existing footings by adding soil as required and pressure
grout original footings between pads supporting added steel tubes.
Provide level grade, compact soil to 95% relative density at added
stemwall (item 5) and provide a minimum of 18" clear under floor joist.
5. Form and pour continuous 12" x 18" footing (n-s) connecting first steel
tube pads from east end with 2#5 T& B. Drill 6" into existing footing
and set matching dowels in epoxy. Provide stemwall (floor joist see
12) with #4 at 48" in grouted cells and 8" x 8" cap with 2#5
continuous.
6. With wall braced, saw cut exterior masonry pilasters (8) as required
to install 4#6 with #3 @ 12"cc full height; anchored into footing by
drilling 8" into existing and set matching dowels in epoxy.
7. Next step is to provide a roof tie beam in high roof section. Saw cut
masonry and set 1#7 T & B and grout similar to item one above for
perimeter of high roof. Verify east masonry wall at high roof area is
supported by and anchored to a concrete or steel beam.
8. After concrete has set weld 3/8" angle plates to added truss seat (8
locations) and anchor to wall with 2-3/4" diameter anchors each side
in epoxy. Anchors may be set in tie beam by cutting interior face shell
at column prior to grouting tie beam in item 7.
9. Drill through wood plate at tie beam and anchor plate with 1/2" diameter
anchors 16" cc @ E & W, 32". @ N & S walls respectively to secure roof ledger
to masonry tie beam. Verify roof deck is adequately nailed to perimeter ledger
for wind shears.
10. Saw cut, clean and grout all cracks in exterior masonry walls. Repair stucco
to match existing. Install new code approved windows.
11. Install utilities, electrical and plumbing per construction documents.
12. Reconstruct ground floor in high roof area by installing treated 2 x 12
southern pine at 16" cc, blocked at center. Subfloor T & G shall be
glued and screwed along each joist. Provide finish floor per
construction documents.
13. Install partitions, fixtures, and ceiling in conformance with revised
architectural drawings; apply wall finishes, and complete work in
conformance with construction documents.
Finally, this suggested conceptual repair outline was prepared with assistance from the
proposed Project Architect, Roy Simon, AIA. It is provided to assist the Legion in establishing a
budget prior to preparation of working drawings. Please keep in mind that any renovation project
always grows in scope and cost as the work progresses. Kindly contact this office for any
• clarifications.
•
Ve r rs,
J n E. Gant, P.E.
cc: Roy Simon, AIA
post office box 1570 fort lauderdale, florida 33302-1
3. Repair continuous footings cut at added steel columns. (8), by
drilling each side and set 145 top and bottom irr epoxy, clean, provide
• bonding agent and cast repair.
4. Stabilize existing footings by adding soil as required and pressure
grout original footings between pads supporting added steel tubes.
Provide level grade, compact soil to 95% relative density at added
stemwall (item 5) and provide a minimum of 18" clear under floor joist.
5. Form and pour continuous 12" x 18" footing (n-s) connecting first steel
tube pads from east end with 2#5 T& B. Drill 6" into existing footing
and set matching dowels in epoxy. Provide stemwall (floor joist see
12) with #4 at 48" in grouted cells and 8" x 8" cap with 2#5
continuous.
6. With wall braced, saw cut exterior masonry pilasters (8) as required
to install 4#6 with #3 @ 12"cc full height; anchored into footing by
drilling 8" into existing and set matching dowels in epoxy.
7. Next step is to provide a roof tie beam in high roof section. Saw cut
masonry and set 1#7 T & B and grout similar to item one above for
perimeter of high roof. Verify east masonry wall at high roof area is
supported by and anchored to a concrete or steel beam.
8. After concrete has set weld 3/8" angle plates to added truss seat (8
locations) and anchor to wall with 2-3/4" diameter anchors each side
in epoxy. Anchors may be set in tie beam by cutting interior face shell
at column prior to grouting tie beam in item 7.
9. Drill through wood plate at tie beam and anchor plate with 1/2" diameter
anchors 16" cc @ E & W, 32" @ N & S walls respectively to secure roof ledger
to masonry tie beam. Verify roof deck is adequately nailed to perimeter ledger
for wind shears.
10. Saw cut, clean and grout all cracks in exterior masonry walls. Repair stucco
to match existing. Install new code approved windows.
11. Install utilities, electrical and plumbing per construction documents.
12. Reconstruct ground floor in high roof area by installing treated 2 x 12
southern pine at 16" cc, blocked at center. Subfloor T & G shall be
glued and screwed along each joist. Provide finish floor per
construction documents.
13. Install partitions, fixtures, and ceiling in conformance with revised
architectural drawings; apply wall finishes, and complete work in
conformance with construction documents.
Finally, this suggested conceptual repair outline was prepared with assistance from the
proposed Project Architect, Roy Simon, AIA. It is provided to assist the Legion in establishing a
budget prior to preparation of working drawings. Please keep in mind that any renovation project
always grows in scope and cost as the work progresses. Kindly contact this office for any
• clarifications.
y's,
ant, P.E.
cc: Roy Simon, AIA
Post office box 1570 fort lauderdale, florida 33302-
Meeting Date: December 12, 2002
Agenda Item :
--- Summary ---
American Legion Post 65 Historic Façade Grant Request
The American Legion has a long history of civic leadership and community service in
Delray Beach. Built in 1919, the building is nationally and locally designated in the
registers of historic buildings. The building has hosted many important social, civic, and
educational activities and fundraisers benefiting the community. The recipients of the
Legion's charity include the City of Delray Beach for the 1928 disaster relief effort, the
American Red Cross and the armed forces during World War II, and current children
and youth programs such as the Boys Scouts and Little League.
The 83 year old building has been deteriorating rapidly within the last decade and is in
serious need of structural repairs. In 1997, $90,000 was invested to stabilize the
foundation, trusses, and roof support. Unfortunately, work ceased for two years and did
not resume until 1999. More work needed to be done to the walls to properly stabilize
the building shell. The Legion obtained a structural analysis in September 2002 for the
necessary improvements. Mouw and Associates General Contractors provided an
estimated cost of $156,530 for the exterior improvements. The attached scope of work
by Roy Simon, Architect, includes strengthening the walls, reinforcing the window jams
to receive new windows, closing other masonry openings, repair and patch stucco,
caulking, and painting exterior surfaces.
The Legion is requesting financial assistance in the amount of $50,000 under the
Historic Façade Easement Program to restore the structural integrity of the building's
envelope. Interior and site work will also be done to restore the building for human
occupancy. The Legion hopes to continue its community service programs within the
building and preserve its legacy for future generations.
Money was not set aside for the Historic Façade Easement Program in the FY 02/03
Budget. However, available funds may be transferred from the Osceola Park
Neighborhood Plan for this item, as work on the implementation of that plan will likely
not begin until the next fiscal year. Supportive documents are attached and project
timeline will be provided at the meeting.
Recommended Action:
Approve the request for a grant in the amount of $50,000 for exterior improvements to
the building located at 263 NE Fifth Avenue.
Submitted By: Thuv Shutt