Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
HPB-02-19-03 MINUTES
MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLICHEARING MEETING DATE: February 19, 2003 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:02 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott, Jim Keavney, Francisco Perez-Azua, and William Branning. MEMBERS ABSENT: Rhonda Sexton STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Loretta Heussi, Ron Hoggard II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes for the Regular Meetings of January 8, 2003 was before the Board for consideration. Mr. Branning moved to approve the minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPRORIATENESS Ms. Jamison read the quasi-judicial regulations. Ms. Heussi swore in all those wishing to speak. A. Murray Residence, 129 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for an addition to a contributing historic dwelling, demolition requests for a contributing garage and non-contributing addition, and associated site improvements for the property at 129 SE 7th Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication by the Board. No ex-parte communication took place. Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and a copy of her resume and presented the proposed project. The project consists of the demolition of a portion of the extant dwelling and the 2/19/03 garage/shed along with associated exterior improvements. Ms. Shay noted that demolition of the contributing garage could be supported due to its severe deterioration and structural instability. She also noted staff's concern over the design of the dwelling's new addition with a Mission style parapet at the sides (north and south elevations) and its incompatibility with the Mediterranean- Revival style of the historic residence. Ms. Balfoort and Ms. Adrianna Finnvold were present to represent the project on behalf of the applicant. Ms. Balfoort presented paint sample and a detail of the proposed fountain. She then inquired about the fountain detail and its dimensions. Ms. Shay agreed that the detail was sufficient as submitted. Ms. Jamison expressed her concern over the demolition of the garage and felt that it should be retained. Ms. Balfoort explained that the design of the wall leading to the garage/shed will be incorporated into the new design but that the structure was beyond rehabilitation. The Board questioned the design of the parapet. Mr. Keavney discussed the idea that the parapet should be stepped. Mr. Branning and Mr. Perez reviewed the parapet design as submitted and concurred that an alternative design would be more appropriate. Ms. Balfoort presented an alternative design which incorporated more of a Mediterranean influence. The Board agreed that the alternative design was more appropriate. Demolition Request After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Mr. Keavney and passed 5-1 (Jamison dissenting) to approve the request for demolition of the contributing garage and the 368 sq. ft. addition at 129 SE 7th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F). Certificate of Appropriateness After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for 129 SE 7th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a- c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to the following conditions: -2- HPB Minutes 2/19/03 1) That the alternate elevation design, as submitted at the meeting, be incorporated into the design of the new addition. 2) That the trellis supports be relocated 6" to the south in order meet the required interior side setback of 7'6". 3) That a fountain detail be submitted including design elements and dimensions. 4) That an awning detail be submitted. 5) That paint samples be submitted. B. Vintage Rose, 102 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Tammy Sickle, Owner. Action Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is to approve a COA associated with Part I of the ad valorem tax exemption application for improvements to a contributing building in the Old School Square Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication by the Board. No ex-parte communication took place. Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the proposed project. The project consists of the rehabilitation of a two- story building for retail use. The Board previously approved a Class V Site Plan for the conversion of the single family home to retail included in the tax exemption application. Ms. Sickle was present to represent the project. It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Mr. Branning and passed 6-0 to approve Part 1 of the construction application for an ad valorem tax abatement for improvements to the property at 102 NE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b). C. The Rectory, 14 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Dharma Holdings Limited, Owner. Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated waiver for the installation of a free-standing sign for The Rectory, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J) and 2.4.7(B). -3- HPB Minutes 2/19/03 Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication by the Board. No ex-parte communication took place. Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the proposed project. Mr. Jimmy Moore and Mr. Phil Tamorina were present to represent the project. The Board previously reviewed a sign proposal for this project during its meeting of February 5, 2003. Upon review, the Board directed the applicant to return with more detailed information regarding the sign's design, colors scheme, and dimensions. The applicant returned with new sign specifications. The Board expressed its pleasure with the new submittal and agreed that the new design complimented the property. Waiver Request It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Mr. Branning and passed 6-0 to recommend to the City Commission approval of the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) to permit more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs on one parcel for 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Certificate of Appropriateness It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign for 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b) and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. D. Atlantic Grove, North 300 &400 Blocks of West Atlantic Avenue, West Settler's Historic District, Tim Hernandez, New Urban Communities, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is that of granting approval of a COA and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for a minor elevation change to the previously approved Atlantic Grove mixed-use buildings, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). -4- HPB Minutes 2/19/03 Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication by the Board. No ex-parte communication took place. Mr. Hoggard entered the project file into record and presented the proposed project. Mr. Hernandez was present to represent the applicant. After much discussion, it was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Mr. Perez and passed 6-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I Site Plan Modification for Atlantic Grove, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(7) and (E)(8), regarding compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding properties and LDR Section 4.6.18(B)(14), Architectural Elevations and Aesthetics — Criteria for Board Action, subject to the following condition: 1) That the sidewalks along the north side of the two mixed-use buildings be re-routed around the stairwells to provide connections to the external sidewalk system. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: None B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: None D. Staff: Ms. Shay reminded the Board that a Special Meeting is scheduled for March 3, 2003 to review the draft of the Design Guidelines Update. The meeting will be held at Pompey Park. Ms. Shay also noted that the Regular Meeting scheduled on March 5, 2003 will be re-scheduled for March 12, 2003 due to conflicts with the City's Tennis Tournament. V. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:30 P.M. -5- HPB Minutes 2/19/03 The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 19, 2003, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on May 7, 2003. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -6- HPB Minutes 2/19/03 < 04, AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION v = BOARD MEETING /P CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: February 19, 2003 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners maybe in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ■ January 8, 2003 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Murray Residence, 129 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for a demolition request of a contributing structure (garage) and a non-contributing addition on the main dwelling and associated elevation changes. B. Vintage Rose, 102 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Tammy Sickle, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for Part I of a tax abatement application for a contributing property. C. The Rectory, 14 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Dharma Holdings Limited, Owner. Consider a certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign. Tabled from February 5, 2003 meeting. D. Atlantic Grove, North 300 & 400 Blocks of West Atlantic Avenue, West Settler's Historic District, Tim Hernandez, New Urban Communities, Authorized Agent. February 19, 2003 Page 2 Consider a COA request to modify design elements, associated with a Class I Site Plan Modification for Atlantic Grove — Elevations for mixed-use buildings fronting West Atlantic Avenue. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff V. ADJOURN Wendy Shay, Hist ric Presery *on Planner POSTED ON: February 13, 2003 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLICHEARING • MEETING DATE: February 19, 2003 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:02 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott, Jim Keavney, Francisco Perez-Azua, and William Branning. MEMBERS ABSENT: Rhonda Sexton STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Loretta Heussi, Ron Hoggard II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes for the Regular Meetings of January 8, 2003 was before the Board for consideration. Mr. Branning moved to approve the minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPRORIATENESS Ms. Jamison read the quasi-judicial regulations. Ms. Heussi swore in all those wishing to speak. A. Murray Residence, 129 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for an addition to a contributing historic dwelling, demolition requests for a contributing garage and non-contributing addition, and associated site improvements for the property at 129 SE 7th Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication by the Board. No ex-parte communication took place. Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and a copy of her resume and presented the proposed project. The project consists of the demolition of a portion of the extant dwelling and the garage/shed along with associated exterior improvements. Ms. Shay noted that demolition of the contributing garage could be supported due to its severe deterioration and structural instability. She also noted staffs concern over the design of the dwelling's new addition with a Mission style parapet at the sides (north and south elevations) and its incompatibility with the Mediterranean- Revival style of the historic residence. Ms. Balfoort and Ms. Adrianna Finnvold were present to represent the project on behalf of the applicant. Ms. Balfoort presented paint sample and a detail of the proposed fountain. She then inquired about the fountain detail and its dimensions. Ms. Shay agreed that the detail was sufficient as submitted. Ms. Jamison expressed her concern over the demolition of the garage and felt that it should be retained. Ms. Balfoort explained that the design of the wall leading to the garage/shed will be incorporated into the new design but that the structure was beyond rehabilitation. The Board questioned the design of the parapet. Mr. Keavney discussed the idea that the parapet should be stepped. Mr. Branning and Mr. Perez reviewed the parapet design as submitted and concurred that an alternative design would be more appropriate. Ms. Balfoort presented an alternative design which incorporated more of a Mediterranean influence. The Board agreed that the alternative design was more appropriate. Demolition Request After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Mr. Keavney and passed 5-1 (Jamison dissenting) to approve the request for demolition of the contributing garage and the 368 sq. ft. addition at 129 SE 7th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F). Certificate of Appropriateness After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for 129 SE 7th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a- c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to the following conditions: -2- HPB Minutes 2/19/03 1) That the alternate elevation design, as submitted at the meeting, be incorporated into the design of the new addition. 2) That the trellis supports be relocated 6" to the south in order meet the required interior side setback of 7'6". 3) That a fountain detail be submitted including design elements and dimensions. 4) That an awning detail be submitted. 5) That paint samples be submitted. B. Vintage Rose, 102 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Tammy Sickle, Owner. Action Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is to approve a COA associated with Part I of the ad valorem tax exemption application for improvements to a contributing building in the Old School Square Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication by the Board. No ex-parte communication took place. Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the proposed project. The project consists of the rehabilitation of a two- story building for retail use. The Board previously approved a Class V Site Plan for the conversion of the single family home to retail included in the tax exemption application. Ms. Sickle was present to represent the project. It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Mr. Branning and passed 6-0 to approve Part 1 of the construction application for an ad valorem tax abatement for improvements to the property at 102 NE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b). C. The Rectory, 14 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Dharma Holdings Limited, Owner. Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated waiver for the installation of a free-standing sign for The Rectory, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J) and 2.4.7(B). -3- HPB Minutes 2/19/03 Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication by the Board. No ex-parte communication took place. Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the proposed project. Mr. Jimmy Moore and Mr. Phil Tamorina were present to represent the project. The Board previously reviewed a sign proposal for this project during its meeting of February 5, 2003. Upon review, the Board directed the applicant to return with more detailed information regarding the sign's design, colors scheme, and dimensions. The applicant returned with new sign specifications. The Board expressed its pleasure with the new submittal and agreed that the new design complimented the property. Waiver Request It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Mr. Branning and passed 6-0 to recommend to the City Commission approval of the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) to permit more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs on one parcel for 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(6)(5). Certificate of Appropriateness It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign for 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b) and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. D. Atlantic Grove, North 300 &400 Blocks of West Atlantic Avenue, West Settler's Historic District, Tim Hernandez, New Urban Communities, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is that of granting approval of a COA and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for a minor elevation change to the previously approved Atlantic Grove mixed-use buildings, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). -4- HPB Minutes 2/19/03 Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication by the Board. No ex-parte communication took place. Mr. Hoggard entered the project file into record and presented the proposed project. Mr. Hernandez was present to represent the applicant. After much discussion, it was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Mr. Perez and passed 6-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I Site Plan Modification for Atlantic Grove, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(7) and (E)(8), regarding compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding properties and LDR Section 4.6.18(B)(14), Architectural Elevations and Aesthetics — Criteria for Board Action, subject to the following condition: 1) That the sidewalks along the north side of the two mixed-use buildings be re-routed around the stairwells to provide connections to the external sidewalk system. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: None B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: None D. Staff: Ms. Shay reminded the Board that a Special Meeting is scheduled for March 3, 2003 to review the draft of the Design Guidelines Update. The meeting will be held at Pompey Park. Ms. Shay also noted that the Regular Meeting scheduled on March 5, 2003 will be re-scheduled for March 12, 2003 due to conflicts with the City's Tennis Tournament. V. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:30 P.M. -5- HPB Minutes 2/19/03 The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 19, 2003, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on May 7, 2003. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -6- HPB Minutes 2/19/03 SIGN IN SHEET Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting of FEBRUARY $, 2003 IC1 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ORGANIZATION ITEM \\A(L. t.,l -E (2>AL-Ek_x ))-1 C= min L t c-zCsZc.(- ik-A1ia2r4,---, l6Ci i7H�a ri O N)v LiD 1??V" -G\-k-eAvr 9-- h/or-'-r--pcT 4c61,(0, '2, - Cp1 1- n \ cp, \i\k_Lor\ (1(_-‘Q 107_ 1 -1 1 - ---k- A-t-1/4-€.__ Vlid,-ty 90s.e , i%i,^�l (/kx 31 b �L tom ' /4=v E. !, , /,2__FDti' - �; MIr1� 1 f\look, 5 ScU dJ�4tJ �`, S n-- - - C-,',. ----ricrei\zry `k,k) i f _C. .--SfL2k ":"}"ADA_..d c40(7, c.,:( ci 1\....) DELBAI'BEACH De1RA1BFACH All-anBr�car ai•an&�cnY HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 1111 MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT 1993 1993 20U1 ?OU1 Agent: Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent Project Name: Murray Residence Addition Project Location: 129 SE 7th Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for an addition to a contributing historic dwelling, demolition requests for a contributing garage and non-contributing addition, and associated site improvements for the property at 129 SE 7th Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 21, Block 126, Town of Delray. Located on the east side of NE 7th Avenue, the property is zoned RM (Multiple-Family Residential-Medium Density) and includes a contributing 1,445 sq. ft., two-story, Mediterranean-Revival style dwelling and 162 sq. ft., one-story, contributing garage which also displays a similar Mediterranean-Revival design. Both were constructed in 1925. The frame residence displays a textured stucco exterior, hip roof and flat roof with tile coping course, modern aluminum awning, multi-light wood casement windows, sliding glass doors, and French doors. The front porch was previously enclosed and displays modern awning windows with decorative arched lintels. The exterior of the contributing garage mimics the textured stucco exterior of the house (though some of the stucco is new) and has a flat roof and decorative arches on the west elevation. The west (front) facade also displays a colorful tile border and a pair of carved wood entry doors. Existing site improvements include a 27'-6" x 17'-6" free form pool; perimeter fence, and tile walkway. The Board's most recent action pertaining to this property was on October 14, 1994, when the Board approved a 525 sq. ft. second story addition on the contributing garage, a connecting tower, and a 150 sq. ft. addition on the rear of the main dwelling. Associated with this proposal was a variance to retain the non-conforming 6' setback (7.5' is required) off of the north property line for the construction of a second story addition on the garage. The addition and associated variance, was approved by the Board however, the addition was never constructed. The applicant is now before the Board for the demolition of the contributing garage and non-contributing addition on the main dwelling, construction of a 353 square foot, two- story addition on the contributing main dwelling and associated site improvements. Meeting Date: February 19,2003 Agenda Item: III.A. . 129 SE 7th Avenue addition COA 2003-078 Marina Historic District Page 2 DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes the following modifications to the historic dwelling: ➢ Demolition of the 162 sq. ft. contributing garage and the 348 sq. ft. rear non- contributing addition on the main dwelling; ➢ Construction of a 353 sq. ft. two-story addition on the rear (east elevation) of the main dwelling; ➢ Installation of three hunter green canvas awnings; one on the west façade and two on the north; ➢ Construction of a wood trellis carport; and, ➢ Installation of fencing and a gate at the front entrance. The project includes the demolition of the contributing garage and a non-contributing addition on the main dwelling in order to accommodate the construction of a 353 sq. ft. addition at the rear (east) of the main dwelling. The addition will feature a stepped/curvilinear designed parapet with decorative medallions constructed on the north, south, and east elevations with a textured stucco exterior intended to mimic that found on the main dwelling. Fenestration for the addition includes the installation of modern aluminum clad, wood core, casement windows on each of the elevations and sliding glass doors on the north and; east elevations. A cantilevered oriel window is located on the second floor of the east elevation in addition to an adjacent balcony displaying sliding glass doors and an aluminum railing. The applicant also proposes an exterior color change with golden yellow for the body, cream for the trim and accents, and hunter green for the window framing intended to match the proposed canvas awnings. North Elevation The north elevation consists of enclosing and framing in the existing first floor door with coral trim and the installation of a wall fountain. A stepped/curvilinear, Mission style parapet with decorative medallion is proposed as a part of the addition on the north façade with paired sliding glass doors and new casement windows on the first and second floors. Two scalloped, canvas, hunter green awnings (measuring approximately (3' x 1'6") are also proposed for the second floor windows. A newly created balcony centered on the second floor completes the north façade improvements. South Elevation Improvements to the south elevation include the addition of a parapet wall as a part of the new addition and three second floor aluminum, casement windows. The proposed parapet mirrors that found on the northern elevation. • 129 SE 7th Avenue addition COA 2003-078 Marina Historic District Page 3 East Elevation The east elevation will display the new addition with a curvilinear/stepped parapet with hip roof, oriel window, and balcony. The addition is stepped in approximately 8" on the south elevation but will extend past the building on the north side by 8" in order to meet the current side setback requirements of 7'6". The location of the proposed balcony on the north façade aids in concealing the projection. The addition will be located approximately 4' from the water line of the existing pool. Fenestration includes the installation of two second floor metal aluminum clad, wood core casement windows while the first and second floors will have new paired sliding glass doors and a new first floor entry door. An aluminum railing is proposed along the second floor balcony which will match the decorative detailing in the front fencing, gate and other proposed railing. West (Front) Elevation The west facade will be modified with the addition of a black aluminum railing running the length of the second floor balcony, the installation of new French doors to be replaced in-kind, and the installation of a 12'3" x 1'6" hunter green, scalloped canvas awning to be installed over both French doors. The awning will have a scalloped edge to match those proposed on the north elevation. Site Improvements A wood trellis carport is proposed directly to the north of the main dwelling which measures 9' wide by 24' in length.. Site improvements also proposed include the installation of fencing and an entry gate in the front of the property and two fountains; one on the north façade and the other to be located in the north courtyard adjacent to the newly proposed addition. The decorative metal fencing and gate will measure approximately 5'6" at its highest point and will consist of black metal fencing (wrought iron look) with square stucco posts and square coral caps. The arched metal entry gate measures 10'0" across and 5'6" in height at its apex. The detail of the proposed fountains have not been submitted; however, as the fountains must be limited in height to no more than 36" (3'). Submission of a fountain detail has been attached as a condition of approval. Further, the applicant proposes a change of exterior paint colors. The proposed colors are golden yellow for the body, cream for the trim and accents, and hunter green for the window trim. The applicant also proposes the installation of three scalloped, hunter green canvas awnings measuring approximately 12'3' x 1'6" (one-west façade) and 3' x 1'6" (two-north facade). The applicant has yet to submit color samples or awning details. Both have been attached as conditions of approval. DEMOLITION FINDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), The HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings; 129 SE 7th Avenue addition COA 2003-078 Marina Historic District Page 4 (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing in the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or:economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. Demolition (garage) In association with the property improvements, the applicant is requesting the demolition of a contributing 168 sq. ft. garage (9' x 18'), which is centered on the north side of the property and set back 6' from the north property line. A decorative stucco arched wall slopes from either side of the front (west) facade. A pair of floral detailed, carved wood doors with decorative tile surrounds provide access on the west side of the flat roof structure. A textured stucco exterior matches that found on the main dwelling though it appears that new stucco has been previously added. Constructed in 1925, the garage is considered a contributing structure however, it is in a severe state of disrepair with deterioration of all the exposed wood due to moisture infiltration and pest infestation. The decorative wood doors are in a similar state of disrepair and the exterior lath and stucco are no longer attached to the building. The structure is also is need of a new roof as the paper and trusses are similarly deteriorated. Based on this analysis, the demolition of the contributing structure can be supported. Demolition (addition) The project also entails the demolition of a 348 sq. ft. (16' x 23') two-story, non- contributing addition on the rear of the main dwelling. The age of this addition is unknown, however, based on its modern fenestration and stucco exterior it is thought to be a contemporary addition. The addition consists of a flat roof extension from the rear of the main building extending the footprint established by the historic dwelling. The addition has a textured stucco exterior, modern aluminum frame awning windows, sliding glass doors, and no further decorative detailing. The addition presently encroaches approximately 6' from the water line of the pool. Due to the age, location, and non-contributing status of the addition, the demolition request can be supported. • 129 SE 7th Avenue addition COA 2003-078 Marina Historic District Page 5 ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (a) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (b) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, color, height, front façade proportions, proportions of openings, roof shapes, and scale of a building. The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that: (a) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (b) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. The construction of the 353 sq. ft. addition can be supported due to its inconspicuous location at the rear of the historic dwelling, its scale and massing, and that the design is stepped back from the original building meeting the required setbacks and making it difficult to view from the right-of-way. The proposed addition is in keeping with the Spanish influenced style of the building however, the Mission style parapets overpower the simplistic hip and flat rooflines of the original footprint. It is recommended that the parapet be re-designed to mimic the, detailing on the original Mediterranean-Revival style building with its stepped parapet, hip roof, and tile coping. The addition of a parapet is not considered inappropriate in relation to the contributing building, however, its design dominates the adjacent hip roof. The addition of such details as decorative medallions, arched lintels, and brackets are encouraged to differentiate the two without varying drastically from the Mediterranean-Revival style of the historic house. For instance, the arch lintel detailing with splade keystone over the front façade windows could be incorporated into the French door design on the north elevation. . 129 SE 7th Avenue addition COA 2003-078 Marina Historic District Page 6 Additionally, the proposed color change for the exterior of the building is appropriate for the building's style and are considered approved colors as the golden yellow, cream, and hunter green are listed on the "HPB Approved Exterior Building Color Chart." The installation of the proposed awnings and railings can also be supported due to their complimentary designs and that the treatments are reversible without irreparably or irreversibly damaging the historic residence. Although the residence is zoned RM multi-family residential), the setbacks are determined based on the R-1-A zoning fro detached single family dwellings within the RM zoning district. With this consideration, the addition will not encroach into the side (south) setback as it is stepped back from the original footprint measuring 7'6" from the south property line. The location of the addition 4' from the water line of the pool is also within the requirements of the Building Code. A portion of the trellis design is permitted to encroach into the setback, however the support posts must meet the required 7'6" side interior setback. The posts must therefore be relocated 6" to the south in order to avoid seeking a variance. This has been attached as a condition of approval. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate if Appropriateness for 129 SE 7th Avenue, based on positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to conditions. C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness for 129 SE 7th Avenue, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Demolition Requests Approve the request for demolition of the contributing garage and the 368 sq. ft. addition, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F). Certificate of Appropriateness Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for 129 SE 7th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-c), (E)(8)(g), . 129 SE 7th Avenue addition COA 2003-078 Marina Historic District Page 7 (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to the following conditions: 1) That the Mission style parapets be removed and architectural details be added which compliment the Mediterranean-Revival style of the historic dwelling. 2) That the trellis supports be relocated 6" to the south in order meet the required interior side setback of 7'6". 3) That a fountain detail be submitted including design elements and dimensions. 4) That an awning detail be submitted. 5) That paint samples be submitted. Attachments: Proposed Elevations&Floor Plan Report Prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner glIMPIMM i•..F4..SYZ 11• Er 40 V51'rCJ r•. I) oue um - e• �k ) C ��lTLANT/C _ , •• -- __ 5'..5' - 45 s77r- - Go.Ir-r~ '1,76 • 7I 7_60 Z •B 7/ 2 34S67„ ` il9� II/6. ti h ici..\ 4Milli ry , .SS .SI/S • Q !If 3.ti • 8 /6 W /g ®®tm NEM►� $ dB Q /9 j I ' /0 hog 1 •2. : R',1 z•` u d2/ 313:' // Esm ., 70 Cs; Walk h. !van d /2 72 �' // 22 IIiI1� v b t' 3 -oUnO� 'mom G 7 Carr c •3,4 -iron•; /3 23 /2 23 • Q :'B J P,i/yc�i/ o, Zp I i1v , . Wall �P d 1t uj '� :? O. EJN. T oS T• /45 00 v i /7f as" )J I�ti7 �.K�O Cy �i1 - . . v✓ooa /, `ST ; ST. rmo 3 �l! 7 • • • • • o I L I pis //s• R.s7 '— 6.1 sr.is Si'do. ('ten= K . �'oi7c Shcd G'Chann 24 o Zi/ 12 3 4 S- . IC - fo71ioan Zink Fence?... 2 /2 I� 23 2 h I._- . • • • .s --•lam. �,t • • . . 't :a -- Wood-- o O /3 E • - • 5 B y• f� II d }2� S7/oY _ Jo_ �-\ 10M• S / /S ,• /�9 �6 ' 7L4,22 89 ��f' `. I h .C• I_ j MI F•GS/ole ce N .• - --. .• •• . ' . --•� `J 6 I�O/6 , /B /107, �0 Vf� N E/ev. 5/ab �/'f ; f 7 /7 ,t.g • // 1�g 7.8s • Fi�c rrn Ras,E. •••/6' �n n / •e • •Poo/ /9/ea . € ' 6 /B /6 9 2' /2 \,^ 03oz < . j 41 : /S /o � /3 • a+r) 201 c.o �i• I' N /O20 y /3 .l /2found 0� A ,3s• ,,,•S ,� ins• iu•� /ii• 'on�;,/a;/ Fc�,Z�/x �� /4s•• �cd.�a 2'`�VC ST. 40/GY.7 07 l C07i /ro _.. $Liw//-pr7 1 /90 �e� In ADS' I 7iof . Er I( Walk o•H• + mod • • . -"IF • I HEREBY'CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON IS A TRUE AND CORRECT R RESENTATION OF A SURVEY MADE '1'1 I UNDER MY DIRECTION,AND THAT SAID SURVEY IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT TO E BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. THERE ARE NO APPARENT GROUND ENCROACHMENTS,UNLESS OTHERWIS OWN.� / �oa�Zvi"e • 8 / V m �ojYimliro/7/ /`7I7e/ DATE G1�s/�Z / r� a iv /Z, /2 5"/oZ - tDoo cl - ,a l REGISTERED SU VEYOR NO. ?Zt3� • • /2 ..S �. ��� �(/C PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON HAS NOT BEEN ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHTS•OF•WAY,AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD;SURVEY SHOWN HEREON ' �/ MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR SURVEY RULE 21 HH 6.03;ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.O.S.DATUM C�Yt?of ��G `7 ��t� UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED;ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE IRON ROD WfTH CAPS,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED;FOUNDATION OF EXISTING/ BUILDINGS LYING BEL01N SURFACE NOT LOCATED,BEARING AIJD/OR ANGLES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RECORD PLAT OR DEED CALLS • UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS SKETCH NOT VALID UNLESS SEALED WITH THE EMBOSSED SEAL OF THE CERTIFYING SURVEYOR. MEASURE. gg I MENTS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNITED STATES STANDARD. •�•DGhd SE 0/7C./ST ' Robert Buggee Joe Tucker Nc;J �P COT 2, .BGO c•.k- 1 ZG • I " ,'EL ZAQ y 8E4«/ /=AG M .&EACH Go RICHARD L.SHEPHARD andAsspIicit /a,B //, /5 4 • .• 315 SOUTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY 010 Wi I RO STREE7 • P OBOX 759 III 2t7B Scale /i'; 24 ' By . BOINTON BEACH FLORIDA 33135 571 RIDA 33 a9, Drawn;No 7374515 11, Dale G//S-z FB 3S2 Pg G N �2 �c - Lt.-9 • • . _ iili'i'i' i'!i I'''i'i'i''I''ilil'I''i''''. /`. ....-a.j.a��:�:�::.�a:-a:�aa.:i:,�� - i1/1'1 _________I.III___________________________ j41 !I=!I II=}I'=�='ll=1'1=IIIIIII]—!1111=IIIIIII= 4�„ IDALFOORT FINNVOLD ARCHITECTURE.INC. .,JdJ.1.44,,, ..h .L . •1tt� i��l I1111111111111111111'llka, :•�i L.!71111 / 1111./•6,.466,.J.1.1..1..1.1..�1.4_.• I • . - • • • • 211 w off U tt �nI �� IOU ;11411 JJIHhIIIllhIIIllhiJiliHll'!HOIIllhIRI1111IHHI'ilifiriWMPS'__ I �� � � ®=_ p 4011�0%04 �004 40fk4 1 1 11i1— — — bI(DCr"i'ill 11 111 I D ��� • �'I'i ii e ,.. .. e =ia ...:,..:..: 1,... id [IE E WEST LEVATION EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/4•.1'0' SCALE:114.•1'0' ti e O0...iS 40/4.WI MO MCI is fife!1 n y y Mal N/CONL G. . . _. , . . . ,...... , - +6,,-.. 1,..:.M, 1 1 I ) : i 70+ , ;._�_.._..�_....:':: ` rt - \\ - ® - ENTRANCEGATE AND FENCE ` � .•'•i�'i:'.• SCALE:114'•1'0' NE}Y ADDITION `'.:11'... `" ..a..�.,/—...."' .4±■*4. FOR MR.SEAN MURRAY /" )( sJ rt 10 B vumn a./7 ro IL1,.RII I/1'J'Uq KO ',:'� I - III sxi cm+a.mI arJ swan,wam 129 SE TTH AVE. .:•._; �,1 t5'/.� /—'�m""' —� ro xan. V.'J-V.'�v.w I.xi OELRAY BEACH,FL xg _ �f +'� �mae 33444 i v MOSE ..rn.wt 1.i tlfvl A.q- ..10 rlMm n SI RJ w 1:.(.0 EOM.w NORTH ELEVATION 410 R.,11 OWNED ro .rtx a/,r.J IOnw MAN./(0 1.04 07 10 a cs�'•`u Ur Ian 0230 1•rWKAt.Ir.rt CO.. SCALE:114•1'0' a.rta cla 10 aww. Q .ma sms,sows,,.wa IxoowMIN �� wxv�c.u.o•s '11 �•".p„ M. REVISIONS ��4,�(�v Ni�Vnn�•vv.v. �•'Z� �' wa aaV6 iom�ca a I'aati mu.c.m imed i11• vinr ✓', 'try '•� c iliA4r • • • I..._ • ,: '' u•.u,il:rocrw.00n» I — — InI TRELLIS DETAIL __ — .....'' '`�1�' SCALE:yr-v 0' r1 —_ilirCre 14)— fr..a......,. Q6122 M�LL—--���,�� �s¢s WO io MOO.Sort ro 1 , \ I , , ....-.....:.2•„;...',..•!.:..........:..,:.:.•:..,,;..:„,:.q.,....‘:•„"..._...:.:-...„...'.'......:....:1.::....:.."..:........:...:.,.:.:..:.:..:... • . .. iiiim ._.:„. . .... ...._........ . . . • NEW SIDE WALL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SOt WII I I OM'''' SCALE 1/4'•1'0' lll�� EVATION 9 SCAL: _ . A3.00,I T I ((' IBALFOORT FINNVOLD ARCHITECTURE.INC. I II a Wee a.r,.wrca uuJse nna.,n aaaat \ PARTITION LEGEND m1 . a..11. I �\ v my me �.w°°°aaea I,J A. ng I 1 �� m�rw1 t.`°°` -.4.ao am I) ®"..E. MV t�w6 must▪ Yoi l7 €3:��lu.rwt wu'".vrw '�1p I1 �.�itV to aw >s• W .aK wR Wra ki cox in loom \‘A GENERAL NOTES PM 20.421.1 OM /-6.1°a.1110.11 NEW IDM �� �� u R,1 Lme i..11�L"1.1c..Lm,�oOr OO .' Auc oG"6"o1�$d'.'3'L7 in i7Fr+. NEW CABANA "�'.w. .1�+�.°".'°'.r"` Q BATH ,.'� 2 ca"..E.p. ffi' .,... MS VI 10 lak. ., I": ! MASTER ® MASTER .0 oL`ua'u,non ctm.s w a.cec.w.as 1e1 _ _ - ° � rill BEDROOM BATHROOM c, - 0 ill NEW ,.. ..., I ti .._r 'II _ . SUN ROOM �� Iiiiif J�� NEW UTILITY ROOM t>77T I © 1a' NEW ADDITON CD "' -�¢ CLOS ® FOR COURT C — IJL_J' '(T3.,..-n.. \/ MR.SEA MURRAY COURTYARD „„,, " n o., //�V(�'"1 { 1 -- 'pCr. v O .0�_ 1285E 7TH AVE. °� © DELRAY BEACH•FL / IXISTING ,, I ® j� ® 33441 .tm..w-� KRCHEN WYO. r r ./ L� t.a.o3 , 0230 GUEST ROOM#2 GUEST ROOM/1 I n I I REVISIONS I- EXISTING LIVING ROOM • IH 1 BM —7 I 1 I on Q IXISTINC 71 Th BALCONY E GOD li l (DaD { FIRST A710 SECOND • FLOOR PLANS , FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN `iv • SCALE:lie.1'0' SCAT E.1/4'•1'0' A2,O91. I • • -.•.. • — ' •.•••• . . .. •........ .....• . . • . . , '•• •• ' • - . - : •. .'.. • .... :. . • • • • . . ••.. . • •.. . •. . •. .i • ' . •'••• • . IBALFOORT FINNVOLD ARCHITECTJRE.INC. . . • • 1' al.OW••04.4.1.1-.•Usili a FT UUDZALIALL.leL..... gRO:tele.4'...'.4....f.:e.t.:'.;.:!..‘....:.'......-.:.-4:'-• 14•44 4.14•110.04.4 4410 ''. " 4.14144!•AA 0003262 '.11......:!.....r"..':.'11 '..:L'.,....f...'.....". " .. I. •. . 4 •• 44 am...a wems....ma w•• mc.....".....fe.".....="4:44.1."". , ya, ::.;.... ••.• • ...\ a 4.4...=.=•=1. r."....2.".........--=--741' . . . . •,.........re.- •••.&r....,'•.:•: .:...:4...• :5;•-•..7,-.1ri=..--t::7--:.* .. •.. . . 7 BUILDING INFORMATION.• . _.......... ,..., .... • feia i:::- • flt.00 IONE 11.• .....- rar.4... \ • Ifillf Dalt TO YON COMO ....c.•'-: :, • 0. .;....... E .. nor MOM HO SY $13:60 ILOC.1 _ta 1„j, • . ••• 11.0.0 ILE. 7.sr EXISTINO . , C . POOL )::::.:' 1.11.1....00 ANA larl tr:;' r 1 ,s‘s, •••..•':.* .. .. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OT al A$110t4•011 CI RC=ITO • . • • , PVT BOOK II.MX 4.MA KA.Ca.Nr.ILA., \ i, s'-o•1...w.--- s. t . 0• .- .. re.TiNVairfacil.) '------1- -1411Tilag.kiiiiliiiiitin,!'4.i? :.: NEW ADDMON FOR V•ALL 1.11 HO. MR.SEAN MURRAY ' , I NEW ADDITION . 129 SE TTH AVE rov4, .•.,•.4• DELRAY BEACH,FL , . ,. 33444 —um coulay... ' .-•.T.f,,,T01,,,,'''TI"'"A,FAU,,''' • •• . ' . ' -1, ----- • ,...—.:. • fi- '',-;;-„:, tr i ::•:'. I 04 03 L• . •7 -ri 77;7r 7 il EXISTINGY 1 '''.:: 1 0230 . . • . L.',•, r 7. -ir RESIDENCE ' ..,L:••••• ...,•.•:: ',,,,:i1.1 I : . . . •• •• I 'ERE 11:- I . REVISIONS • PORT .....- .. . mixecsiollwic • -.. ::::::.; .•':`, III I .1 ••:..:i • '•', I ......• .:...:. . • ,,...•::. to.,f.... .,..., '''...'•'.,'..-••••.='• ':'').. . •'"? J.4.. ,-,.:•:•-•".' .::.:.:-.::........ DarrINO 11.4..Ft I.' .::.............,:.•..."........, ..........s.: .0 OW 1-...... i 1•i': NO 1044 TO NAVA TM. • V.::.%. un rai ca 1W2 •,` :;.:•••,.:•••:.,‘,..........:. :........' . . .........1..- ,. ••• 4;•;•.....'il . A- . ' . '•.• SITE PLAN • SITE PLAN •::. •• %. A1.00 I • _____ _ _ SHEET OLLRAYBLACH OLLR (.14ACH All-AmericaeltYd ki lwrtr d HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT 1111. 1993 1993 2001 2001 Agent: Tamelyn Sickle, Owner Project Name: Vintage Rose Ad.Valorum Tax Exemption Part I Application Project Location: 102 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is to approve a COA associated with Part I of the ad valorem tax exemption application for improvements to a contributing building in the Old School Square Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property contains a frame vernacular, single family home located on the south 11.5' of Lot 15 and all of Lot 16, Block 67, Town of Delray in the Old School Square Historic zoning district. The two-story, contributing historic building, located at 102 NE 1st Avenue, was constructed in 1939 and retains its historic integrity. During its meeting of August 7, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved a Class V Site Plan for the conversion of the contributing building from residential to retail including the construction of a ten space parking lot, paver block walkways, and associated landscaping. The project is currently under construction. The applicant is now before the Board to request review of Part I of the tax abatement application for the improvements affiliated with the project referenced above. PROJECT DESCRIPTION In August 2002, a COA application associated with a Class V Site Plan application was submitted for the rehabilitation of the property. The project includes the following modifications: • Conversion of the contributing historic residential building to retail; • Construction of an asphalt parking lot with nine (9) standard spaces and one (1) handicapped accessible space; • Installation of brick footpaths leading from the parking area to the south elevation/entrance and a brick patio area on the west elevation; Meeting Date: February 19, 2003 Agenda Item: III.B. 102 NE 1st Avenue Ad Valorum Page 2 • Demolition of a one story, flat roof (non-contributing) extension on the south elevation • Installation of a picket fence as well as associated landscaping and refuse storage areas. The two-story, frame dwelling displays original detailing such as wood clapboard siding and side facing gable roof. Some of the original 6/6 wood frame windows remain in the building and will be retained where feasible. A one-story garage and flat roof extension lie on the south and north elevations respectively. The dwelling suffers from severe deterioration (wood rot and decay) and neglect. Cosmetic in-kind repairs have been necessary in order to remedy this situation. The proposed improvements (as state above) are currently underway. The tax exemption would apply to the expenditures associated with the demolition of the one- story porch, exterior improvements to the building including in-kind cosmetic repairs, installation of the parking, and hardscape improvements including the proposed fencing and lighting. All landscaping associated with is project is not permitted as a legitimate expenditure as it is not interpreted as a "site improvement" pursuant to the Florida Administrative Code 1A-38. Based on State regulations, an ad valorem tax exemption can be approved for a project before, during, or after it has been undertaken. The applicant therefore requests consideration of an ad valorem tax exemption as construction is currently underway. AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION Standards for Qualifying Improvements: LDR Section 4.5.1 (M) (5) (b) states: For an improvement to a historic property to qualify for an exemption the improvement must: (i) Be consistent with the United States Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended; (ii) Be determined by the Historic Preservation Board to meet criteria established in rules adopted by the Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, FAC 1A-38, as amended; (iii) Be consistent with Section 4.5.1 (E), "Development Standards"of the City's Land Development Regulations; and (iv) Include as part of the overall project, visible improvements to the exterior of the structure. The project meets criterion (i) through previous approval by the Board of the addition and improvements mentioned above which constituted its compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The project meets the criterion ' 102 NE 1st Avenue Ad Valorum Page 3 (ii) as being consistent with the rules of Florida Administrative Code 1A-38, promulgated by the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources. The project meets criterion (iii) as the Class V Site Plan that accompanied the COA request applied the LDR Development Standards in the assessment of the project. Finally, the project meets the requirements of criterion (iv) as the project encompasses visible improvements to the exterior of the buildings and related property. In previous ad valorem tax relief requests, Part 1 of the construction application accompanied the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness. In this case, the tax relief application was submitted after approval of the COA, where the details of the design were scrutinized and subsequently approved. For purposes of the ad valorem tax exemption, submission and consideration of Part 1 of the construction application is permitted after construction has begun. Part 2, the "Final Application/ Request for Review of Completed Work" will be submitted when the work is complete. The Final Application will include documentation of all costs incurred during the project and the approved building permit application listing the cost of the work performed. The Historic Preservation Board will review the Final Application, upon completion of the project, to determine whether the completed improvements are in compliance with Part I of the construction application. Following the Historic Preservation Board's review, upon completion of the project, including the eligible construction costs and improvements (Part 2) and compliance with Part I of the construction application, the matter will be forwarded to the City Commission with a recommendation to grant or deny the exemption. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve Part 1 of the construction application, COA 2003-116-SPI-CL1, for an ad valorem tax abatement for improvements to the property at 102 NE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b). 3. Deny Part 1 of the construction application, COA 2003-116-SPI-CL1, for the ad valorum tax exemption for improvements to the property at 102 NE 1st Avenue, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b). RECOMMENDATION Approve Part 1 of the construction application, COA 2003-116-SPI-CL1, for an ad valorem tax abatement for improvements to the property at 102 NE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b). Attachments:Staff Report for Class V Site Plan, Application Report prepared by Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH bit All•Aaa''cad), All-Amerrri d HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD � ��= MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT �I�I 1993 - 1993 2001 2001 Agent: Dharma Holdings Limited Project Name: The Rectory Project Location: 14 South Swinton Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated waiver for the installation of a free-standing sign for The Rectory, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J) and 2.4.7(B). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 11, Block 61, Town of Delray and is located on the west side of South Swinton Avenue approximately 80' south of Atlantic Avenue. The property is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). Constructed in 1912 as the Rectory for the City's first Methodist Church, the two-story frame vernacular building is considered a contributing property as a part of the Old School Square Historic District. During its meeting of October 15, 1997, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved the site plan and design elements (including the installation of a handicapped accessible parking space) for the rehabilitation of the Rectory Building. This proposal included the construction of an ADA accessible ramp at the rear of the property. Relocation of the ramp to the front of the building was reviewed and approved by the Board on February 18, 1998. On July 1, 1998, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved the Certificate of Appropriateness (COA 327) for an exterior paint change, change of roof material, and installation of shutters. The proposed improvements were undertaken. During its meeting of February 5, 2003, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a proposal to install a free-standing sign associated with the Rectory building. The sign's dimensions were 68" (5'8") in width with a 36" (3') high sign body and 72" (8') height including the decorative support posts. Due to a lack of information regarding the sign's copy, font size, and proposed color scheme and based on direction by the Board regarding the addition of design elements, the Board tabled the item and requested that the sign be considered by the Board when the applicant could provide an accurate Meeting Date: February 19,2003 Agenda Item: III.C. The Rectory 2003-080-COA 14 South Swinton Avenue rendering of the sign. The applicant is now before the Board for re-consideration of the sign. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is to install a free standing sign for a retail establishment. The proposed sign will be constructed of urethane intended to mimic the look of carved wood to compliment the frame building. The sign will be painted/stained dark brown with white text and the establishment's pink starburst logo. The text includes the name of the establishment, "The Rectory" in white copy (all caps) integrated into the logo with "jewelry, gifts, and clothing" in white copy (lower case) to the left of the logo. The sign will be framed and painted/stained to match the sign color pursuant to the Board's direction. Located at the southeast corner along the front facade of the building, the sign will be oriented to face South Swinton Avenue with text on one side only. The free standing sign measures 72" (6'0") in width (including the 6" square support posts) with a 34" (2'10') high sign body, and an overall height of 48" (4'0") including the decorative support posts. Ground level uplighting will be provided to illuminate the sign. A waiver is requested in association with this project in order to permit the installation of more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs within one lot, parcel, or development pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7). ANALYSIS SIGN ANALYSIS: The Board shall consider: SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(1)(b) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Free-standing signs" A free-standing sign is not affixed to any other structure. It may be either a pole sign or a monument sign. Neither the pole nor the base of the monument shall be considered in calculation of the area of the sign face. A free-standing sign may not have more than two faces. LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and states: Meeting Date: February 19,2003 Agenda Item: III.C. The Rectory 2003-080-COA 14 South Swinton Avenue The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7). LDR Section 4.6.7 (H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (E) with respect to height and area. Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building façade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the views and appreciation of the building: Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the architecture. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts; however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining" and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. However, one standard states the following: Meeting Date: February 19,2003 Agenda Item: III.C. The Rectory 2003-080-COA 14 South Swinton Avenue "New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment." WAIVER ANALYSIS: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7), not more than one of any type of sign nor more than two signs are permitted per lot, parcel, or development. The applicant has requested a waiver to this requirement. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; and, d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Each building and sign on the parcel has a unique architectural style and the signs reflect the historic nature of the property as well as the architecture of the individual contributing buildings, which are utilized for separate business establishments. Given the above, the waiver request will not adversely affect the neighboring area or grant a special privilege as the request is unique to the property and is necessary in order to convey the establishment's identity from South Swinton Avenue. No public facilities will be diminished and no unsafe situations will be formed by the granting of this waiver. Thus, positive findings can be made to recommend to the City Commission approval of the waiver request for the installation of an additional sign on this parcel. Conclusion The proposed signage conveys the identity and location of the establishment. The design is appropriate in relation to the style, scale, massing, and design in the area in relation to the surrounding commercial signage and in relation to the width of the building. For instance, the sign for Sweet Art by Lucila at 20 South Swinton Avenue, just south of the Rectory Building, measures 81" (6'9") in height and 42" (3'6") in width. The proposed sign height will be 48" (4'0") with an area of approximately 24 sq. ft. Per LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(d), as the building is located within the Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), the sign may be placed within the front yard setback and meets the standards per LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7). Based on the above, positive findings with Meeting Date: February 19,2003 Agenda Item: III.C. The Rectory 2003-080-COA 14 South Swinton Avenue respect to LDR Section 4.6.7, the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards can be made. REVIEW BY OTHERS The Delray Beach Sign Review Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the location, sign design and dimensions during its meeting of January 31, 2003. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA and the associated waiver and Class I site plan modification for the installation of a sign at 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory. C. Deny the COA and associated.waiver and Class I site plan modification for the installation of a sign at 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory. RECOMMENDATION Waiver Recommend to the City Commission approval of the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) to permit more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs on one parcel for 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Certificate of Appropriateness Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign for 14 South Swinton Avenue, The Rectory, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b) and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Attachments: Survey, Sign Details, Photos Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner Meeting Date: February 19,2003 Agenda Item: III.C. • LOT 11,BLOCK 61 AND THE EAST 131.6 FEET OF THE SOUTH 3 FEET OF A 16 FOOT ALLEY LYING NORTH OF AND ADJACENT TO LOT 11,BLOCK 61 CITY OF DELRA Y BEACH Z_.._ 16':Af.LNY : . .r.� /, „ I Fr:r./.', !r, (CiA.M,/.l ▪ C: -, I (FORMERLY TOWN OF S • rot/AID 11z-he 4:"Ovrrvnn A0 WIRY.) `q>' v .4 (UAMILI MdERE O) 7.4C•. I)'�_1.5, g9 7.7` f7.G5"� \ According to the plat recorded in Plat Book 1,Page 3,•recorded in the public 9.l'. sc records of Palm Beach County,Florida;said land situate,lying, and being in in -�'r-�'r' _� 3Ur:.Ot:✓G I Palm Beach County,Florida. �_ q? 7/ \'•• F O h 1 V ' v. / 1 U ER '. IN-7rj ,C. r^ _� -.; • �m \ BEARINGS SffOWN NEAEON ARE flELATIVE70 PLAT a '� 5 r • , ' , 1y N� I AND ARE ASSUMED. Z 1 . 5' 3.i'tir�� aIIIvwa' �17.Sa' \�,4, k' u� • ' eyy S"4.•9 I_ NO ABSTRACT OR TITLE SEARCH WAS PERFORMEDl ` f V TO DISCOVER THE EXISTENCE OF ANY EASEMENTS .11u Val c41�`r� w _ - • µ-,me / OR RESTRICTIONS OFRECORD. + L ca� - -r �+,®• NORTH T�`Y e I "e r T. t �Irl.®. `( � s9 Is tr • I ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON 's Coun W ,1,E p /.i ., toto i 5t G N P, NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 _ CoVil��io�ps ;FA 1 tl§ ..r`,.{LS� FJ / „y ( m c' � '�N-• r I N UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. r l• t(.•4'sF, § y 1 Not to Scale -1qt, 0 ; ,.^ .. 9 \ 5 I `�°. f�r` �. e :'-tuft r,74 it i-2 i Vicinity l NO BELOW GROUND IMPROVEMENTS,FOOTERS, •r ;!' f F. I d ry '3,- FOUNDATIONS OR UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED /� ;p 11, Map ! �°� LOT 12 BLOCK 61 4 I I OR SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. ���•� LOT 11 BLOCK 6l • '}.R�+�Q e?F I O.R.B.=elf icial'record book Tran.=transformer pad P.O._plat book P=plat PG.=page 'S.T.7'i_..:�i. i) C.B.S.=concrete block structure F.P.&L=Florida Power&Light Typ=typical k1=power polo I.R.=iron rod u..- !r en GRAYcL J P.C.C.=point of compound curve CM=concrete monument NW=right•ol-way M=measured R=radius • ORAV_ V I P.C.P.=permananent control point P.R.C.=point of reverse curve =central angle I.P.=iron pipe D=deed P.O.C.=point of commencement P.I.=point of intersection QB=bearing basis lino RP=radius point 0/S=offset N a '.'' P.O.B.=point of beginning P.T.=point of tangency Asph=asphalt L=arc length Cone=concrete DIE=drainage easement 9 =not field measured M.H.=manhole CL=centerline Esmt=easement 1' • .: I i! , , C.M.P.=corrugated metal pipe WPF=wood privacy fence U/E=utility easement ALUM.=aluminum Cale=calculated . WALL / 'r/rF-. R.L.S.=registered land surveyor Chatt=chattahoochee CLF=chain link fence P.C.=point of curvature L.B.=licensed business P.R.M.=permanent reference monument • IU�III Renner Certified To: . I 1i7,'4 r2 On'2t/13cW 1 S.E.4th Ave.,Suite 205 Delray Beach,FL 33483 TIIE AEACUS ItEAI,ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CO• _�„ (U.LA/ur l3Er'.6:.:' Its— Phone 561 243-4624 FOU,tIICIrL•iR.Y Ci,% 9A I / hs'Successors.entVor:\sslµee D, Fax 243.4869 Ccµ/A/LN9B_R.D��� �,.. / Land West Palm 735-7639 •A'ITONNEY'S'1'1'1'I.E INSURANCE FUND,INC. _ A 1 \ -74a• I �Il,�r f Surveyor West Palm Fax 735.7641 • FDU,tdO DRILL 1A0tG f v —r~- 77.70 " •F e' Toll Free 1-800.773.5531 �— (C/UA/un.18ERE0) / I `� U./ALX, CHR3 G!rTr=.•i•--.` '� Fax Free 1•800.9544408 S —S Prepared By:Absolute Land Surveying,Inc. (581)278.6377 Flood Zone: "X.' 1 S.E.uh Avenue e205•Delray erect,,FL 334e3 AulnoneCien Numbs 0 5LB6504Deli Map No: I 25102 GOO 4 " J99.50' ✓ I hereb,cartel tat the Sketch of Boundary Survey shown hereon Y Y Map Date: /• 7 3`7 V PLOT MBAs, 14 S.SWINTON AVENUE moor t e minim m technical standards sot forth In Chapter 61 G 17.6, Not valid unless FQCLUO AJA(L ✓ /SR Florid Admini five C pursuan to Section 472.027, Florida Oale: 4 25 �7 sealed with embossed ([InJ.t✓l/M3<RcO� State f.t • PA. 4- Job No: 4 Z 4 0 surveyor's seal Harry A. gess Fr P.L.S.No..5089 Revised: Page 1 of 1 6"x6" wood post stained brown PANTONE 476U 112' routed band 62' 6' painted white / Signs body: _______ �;�' stained brown to matEh—�_� ti v i f posts and frame = y` r• t •-% PANTONE 476U �. 34• HE RECTORY_ ��'-'P 4 2" frame jewelery gifts clothing , = i - 7.'„ , stained brown----- *1, . PANTONE 476U 1 , ,L __ Top of sidewalk ,1 i post set with concrete i Lettering Logo carved and carved and painted white painted pink 2 PANTONE 204U / file://C:\Documents%20and%20S ettings\shay\Local%20S ettings\Temporary%20lnternet%:... 2/14/2003 . . __ _. ... - • . . ,, ...-_ • -'1 -‘ . . . ''''• •'' %1*.., '. : te.• ..,,„,, ,4 ,.. ,!.!,• ' ' '' .',-, .,-•, ,...... '''-4f.:,:%:.,„-,-", -.•.\ ,.1 ,,,, -;,, , , ,, ....- Tilfci If it-,• .A, -;,' ) V-4U4----:--.-.. .?'t'W,A\'','I'Vit ' i ..-.1;--..- t•-• ' , ',, AL:kis+'••••• ,':i...:4*..-,.,IS: .'.'4 Pq 1,'• 1 '•-\;:p.,,.z,l', •Ik. lip,40,..z--;,--i..-ir,--;-.'47..... .,.vil qi• •I :..4, ,,t, , ' ' ' \ -. _...-. ..-•-•- - - ---- -..,,cr. r-.7.-.=-:.... ,..,, ,, r;••.; .. ',,.•), • ..- • — .., - '— - • ''5lo,f\-- , .., . . . . . .1 '•)•,,'Pt/ 1:- .1P! \••••'''' - '-'4."‘ • .r. - tA.-•kso .. t6 1 ' '1 1 i - - Pt „. 7."-`"Y 1..'3'.v'i ..r 0 N;". ' '. 1•' ;361 7 7,-•,-•-..;;„,atti.„ -,-..t 0:13::"...:::-.tiiffs.f.(4::•_4.0.,,,,:,„:1__,5":4":/;:!..1.:.t.... , . .0.,;, ..,',ti.n..; .o,L.,. ..E ..1 _,Iall_r..-1'1•11:',1*-._......*------- ' . -i,':„......,_.47Iir. ...,as..,4--otiS 11., . - tr,:.-- ;4-4, ,i •••-,,,,‘ 91 ... '.4;11!,.. .*..,e• '."...%?f,;:i,...est,'''.:1 1,43;;.:;::":,,-T 1-fi- 1 I:: TC fn , •'\i, s. -._ .-- liz %Ik ; - - • .•"ac.1•414k Wi,./' lr-11. 114 '.!, .,. , i ) • I rt1/..' /11, 11' • \ ..i.44...A.,4„ ' _11. ..k --.141this.' ',V,1' l'il oil ir?'•>- -,,,,. 44,11r,: ., • .4'--: -: -. --' . / ..,... .77-:" i • -/- -, ...._.._— .. -4deptrIIIIIINIPIV '\ ) .• • i - - - • - -- .- . --- .-. - . • . . . __------ The Rectory, 14 South Swinton Avenue— facing West Proposed sign will be located just below the temporary sign shown here • I ..N ,.'" ••- '" ' \\\ - • , 1• "\.I"lit'', . , \\ •• . _ - - - .•'.;`;.' 6'. 4 -,..111' -F- /'.•.1-T:i ',I% r; 4P161111 "-------------- -- '.•' 1'.$,E*,,,,f -,. ••'' •..."' . ' I ' V4,..' ;-• \I-01 ..,.,...... .. .. , - - ,:.--, ... :74 .. ..-:.... 1.- t .1 i. ,,a, _a__________ '•i-_=- - =.-_-_- =_--_ =-7-=____ E--•._ = — •••*,•-s.--` Ni,rV.•,•4•NPrAct. ,_•.,‘''.,...." ,.•• -• I'• 1 : , , -1------ ____=--- -..•:-.4,-,-4- •• _. ,.,, -...y.,..1.4 •f‘,..,;,„- • . -••,--, :•• ••,I.• ;: •41- -;•14- 1, •••;..,i 7''' ' .'".'44,ree"iii'471.;:. :'•;W14,r /*... .,,!-*:: • ,LE,i , • r.-1.- . , s• - ,.--,,.sb, .•, --.4.- _ A' mclit.t•' i .1,v.,,,,,-,,,,,,:,•‘,..i;.:i.,. ,,,,,. .....:,..,..... , v.i. 4,, _ . , _——— '44,44‘,„•,4:74-_Se ',:'31. kl!dit, .,`&.t4.I.\ P. . ..----'..- s• :. CP!"-: ', ••••.........,......• . -ifS' It'a‹.;.--•tliP':';.-; --..(4-It • '' .\ °4'. - " ' ' :: . V,-...,--Z!'.,!*.A.c.' 7's '-'.'• •• . ., - • ' , . ,- ......., ,1,74'•••'-'"47..11 ;..';'t-Ct• ....-. ; ' - .' '• 41Mit•A'; j,41‘4PW- . --'u.4:/' sq.':''" .•''01 ,..,;••E'.:•••••iii': . '''.''' ' ' , • ,....;,..' " . -.rP ttM‘flP -,'.' .4 Z... 4114-;". L' -TORY . , v•itifizt„,:e. :•:.4.0.,4... ., .r',...; ... i .,. • 4 .‘4 t". .r.gri....,.• ,.r.z, ._ - \ ' ' • : •,`,.),,,A,),A1 . ;al,. , . 1 .• • •i.: , 1 _ . mr, yr.- ,i-.%-rri:-. - --,I-A- 1 . 417. - 1. pi r • 1 1 .. I I OOP!' 4: • . ...---, ,.---'''.4*--3-!`"i:• -,• '''.. likk ,...44.i.,".4. re I, 1.1 p li.,e,k4,..i` ,'''' ',! ., ' . _, .1c,„Vs ' lir ': ilt ; All'i,I i'.' 'i ....g,.4,.... . • (c.• ' - -t'. . •. • . ).• , •,41 _..•••• 4.:'V..1 ,jp,( -f1-• 1 4 r4.4.-‘....-1-;P:-, *. -• ''' v - ' - -...-- .,Far,, it , ,,,,,, •....3, ,4\ ,:„ ., •-•,---r• v:0;....,/ - '— • - .. .,!-. 1pi: .„... . : ::...& ,.. ., , . _.,.,:.-...--......_f , - naT*1 7- + r-." .' i-,"4 R-..2.v.'''....4'•..l.,,I. ,`' '''' .'',..',.v` •••4.\.titP,4,... 1:.' ,• ,N...,,,,,,,1., ..,'... t--2,;;.-::...- ,', -• , .,' , . 17, i ..$,t., `.,.._-::...:;,'7:',''','.-'*-!'; ...r• - --.ittl:',AtIe...4.---- \-•-•-.. ,. , .,-/";)- • •:'4. ' , I,:'.',- -112:7;;A'2, -'i• -• :. ''...;'f,r-;..'" *3.:.. . ;r-.14, ----. --- . - .• . ,.. .. . —' ` f HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ; STAFF, REPORT... Project Name: 2003-121-COA—Atlantic Grove Project Location: North 300 & 400 Block, West Atlantic Avenue Avenue, West Settlers Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of granting approval of a COA and associated Class I Site Plan modification for a minor elevation change to the previously approved Atlantic Grove Mixed Use Buildings, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The property, located within the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Area, was assembled by the CRA for redevelopment as a mixed-use project. A Request for Proposals (RFP) for the project was issued on March 1, 2000 and the Atlantic Grove development, consisting of townhouses in the rear and commercial buildings fronting on West Atlantic Avenue, was chosen from among four proposals. The residential component of the project includes eight 3-story buildings containing a total of 55 townhouses with two-car garages. The two 3-story buildings, fronting on Atlantic Avenue contain retail/office/restaurant uses on the ground (1st) and 2nd floors and 20 residential condominium units on the 3rd floor. The Site Plan was reviewed and approved by HPB on August 15, 2001. On February 6, 2002, the Board approved the Landscape Plan and final Building Elevations and Design Elements for the project. On November 20, 2002, the Board approved revisions to the Building Elevations for. the Townhouses. The development is currently under construction. The action currently before the Board concerns revisions to the building elevations of the two mixed-use buildings fronting on West Atlantic Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Due to a Building Code requirement for a secondary means of egress from the residential units on the third floor, the applicant has been required to provide stairwells on each side of the two buildings in the rear. The modified site plan and building elevations reflect the addition of these stairwells. As approved, the two mixed-use buildings utilize different architectural styles, color and varying rooflines to make the buildings appear to be made up of smaller buildings. The roof is divided into five segments which include two sections of standing seam metal roof, a flat roof with a simulated stone cornice and two sections of Spanish tile roof. Architectural detailing includes raised banding, decorative metal railings, decorative outriggers, faux columns, simulated stone panels and decorative metal grillwork. Variations in window treatments have been provided with a mixture of different sizes, shapes and types. Variation is also provided by adding different treatments around the windows such raised Meeting Date: February 19, 2002 Agenda Item: III.D. . HPB Staff Report • Atlantic Grove: COA-2003-121 —Modification of Mixed-Use Building Elevations Page 2 stucco banding and canvass awnings. Balconies are provided on the front façade of the 3rd floor for the residential units. An exterior walkway is provide on the rear façade of the 2nd and 3rd floors. A central gallery is provided through the building on the first floor for access to the rear. DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS Required Findings: The Board must make a finding that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with provisions of Section 4.5.1. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(7), the construction of new buildings or structures shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color and location of adjoining sites. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), all improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of height, front façade proportions, window openings, rhythm of solids to voids, rhythm of buildings on streets, rhythm of entrance and porch projections, materials, texture, color, roof shapes, walls of continuity, scale of building. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.18(B)(14) Architectural Elevations and Aesthetics — Criteria for Board Action, the following criteria shall be considered, by the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board (SPRAB), in the review of plans for building permits. If the following criteria are not met, the application shall be disapproved: (a) The plan or the proposed structure is in conformity with good taste, good design, and in general contributes to the image of the City as a place of beauty, spaciousness, harmony, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality. (b) The proposed structure, or project, is in its exterior design and appearance of quality such as not to cause the nature of the local environment or evolving environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value. (c) The proposed structure, or project, is in harmony with the proposed developments in the general area, with the Comprehensive Plan, and with the supplemental criteria which may be set forth for the Board from time to time. Positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(7)&(8) and LDR Section 4.6.18(B)(14) were made at the time of the previously approval. The proposed elevation changes are relatively minor and do not affect the overall scale, mass or character of the proposed buildings. The proposed stairwells at each side of the two mixed-use buildings consist of open stairs connecting the 2nd and 3rd floors and an enclosed stairwell on the 1st floor. The stairs are located in the rear of the buildings and are not visible from West Atlantic Avenue. The visual impact on the side and rear elevations is minimal and does not detract from the FHB Staff Report Atlantic Grove: COA-2003-121 —Modification of Mixed-Use Building Elevations Page 3 overall look of the buildings. Please note that the enclosed side elevations depict open stairs between the 1st and 2nd floors. This is in error and revised plans will be presented at the meeting. While the impact of the stairwells on the building elevations is minimal, their location will have a negative impact on the pedestrian circulation around the building by eliminating the connection to the external sidewalk system as provided in the approved plans. To alleviate this problem, the sidewalks should be rerouted around the stair enclosures adjacent to the parking lot. This will necessitate changing the adjacent parking spaces to compact spaces, which can be accommodated by adding curb stops. The sidewalk connections to the parking lot should be moved next to the stairs to minimize the loss of landscaping in the rear. These site plan changes have been added as a condition of approval. The changes to the building elevations are being proposed to meet the requirements of the Building Code. Staff supports the change with the condition the sidewalks be rerouted around the stairwells to provide connections to the external sidewalk system. Since the impact of the stairwells on the building elevations is minimal, positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(7)&(8) and LDR Section 4.6.18(B)(14), Architectural Elevations and Aesthetics — Criteria for Board Action, can again be made. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve COA 2003-121 and associated Class I Site Plan modification for Atlantic Grove, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1 (E)(7) & (8) and LDR Section 4.6.18(B)(14). C. Deny COA 2003-121 and associated Class I Site Plan modification for Atlantic Grove, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1 (E)(7) & (8) and LDR Section 4.6.18(B)(14). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I Site Plan Modification for Atlantic Grove, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(7) and 4.5.1(E)(8), regarding compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding properties and LDR Section 4.6.18(B)(14), Architectural Elevations and Aesthetics — Criteria for Board Action, subject to the following condition: 1. That the sidewalks along the north side of the two mixed-use buildings be rerouted around the stairwells to provide connections to the external sidewalk system. Attachments: • Site Plan, Approved Building Elevations and Proposed Building Elevations s:\planning &zoning\boards\hpb\atlantic grove\atlantic grove commercial elevations modification.doc I • j .. - 1, ). ..-._ • ..._ . , • t .- D ---,.. 1‘.-1 • ' r ' ' . - . .. •• 1 . . , .• . • . ...... . , . i .. -..., F'"':•--— hL(1J1O7, -11-2E 7i!W , uc' —36 Lc' ,.. • Io•cuts e '.;•"u•'r.<s..t•;'..i!,;;f;1;e'...e).,.,,1,,:-..4.;2..:49,,A:,.:,;;C•••r.,•-.,,„r•:(,::;i,.-,...,.;:,.,t,.".,•V-'t I-7 ., MATHLINC; H.„,E IE3S7. H, EIIT FA 2 F 1 ' , tli igl eiiisolz . 12.vei aj N _ rc --i - -,i7s,,..„i.i..-.;72f..:;,...".../silL.e....., • r3 .,., .1 nil.' Et '1,r,e;4',. ,' ril.I.I.,_11M1.---11° - --iiiikVAr •". • . , N ' ,..,•..i. — 111"Cr PIS HO 01110 .•111 •,..'3I .4 .._ _ .: ',... / .I','',1:., 1 ,',I, II ii, ,,,1 IlL•,4 1 r i II 11 Ilirli ,, RbFwpi 1 . 1 A trigAttxcepo . 1 , •,r., :i fe-1-4....fi;"-- . ',41-#4•11"., 031c- '' - " .. -4 ir• I I.'Yir-,..••J 16,; i 1% , . . • -, • r.,, `1-r...,L, : ;.?1 1 4:4';';'::•....1,- I a .:.•' i I I;•‘:'''•"r•,C.1 ir.A. i f.',":6,I Eat WPM,ASI1P1.1 IMInel v,c7,v.,..).,$r Aspaiiiiiiiik l', •, , kItilli. ;i, co . .. I 1,1't Ea3 ma...p.,,,,, • 4, - •1 4. k. di FROMM OM WC Ma \ •.-• "I Him i Pt, :, ...,1•,1 —--— 2F51,-1.1cucrtzrt..1" I.''.. -:'.• ...2"4•J •:,'.14. ' MET.I l'JA,Lt r'AVii(',K):•A1r3,'`•,k':T..rp.iTh.cjri?Vt,etD.E/.,7n;•.r:,p i.e..T4.•,,.,"g..ti!.•i:1 rt;7• •••• :•/ •-,v'. .: run o=rewma ,4V1 tl .4i1em •"tJil•ml l_ii__tl.t•,aBLOCK 4 Y7 mu • ...i••,••-.I,;.....•.: .. !,)'. ,41,,,-,..;•.T .,11.,1.-ir-,.-41.1.it......„.„.,_,,,,,. .7.•..,:.,.,4 im..r.to •pi ,...1 :., .' t 1 i l'' - -.. . 30 Mil. rl, •,,,'',. ‘''''4 'Hi,. ..i = I 1----...„„ig 7.•P l4115VOV'20•1,,. 71r i 7..•.: ',.?.,, _s 0. V , E• I 4: •1 ir.. irir, III .V‘:'/I.J° 4 NI61111 ,,, 1 ,, Imo j..,„"ci.,,,,L.Frif:_.,.;....,2,;,4,,,,:1.,,,,,r, .!•a,c.......1!4 al..;:rea It.mR.i,..,.. ,nir•., , ..„,,,,,,,,,,,,;:,./,,,,,....1.:1,, ;JII i .,..., ..'; ..1 .1':...,t I., •,- s ... ...',,....• ij,4; ! ...,,,3 I•6) 4.„„,,,, 4, c • 4,..,11 , I %NW 1 .. /t,, f- • ' 1 1 11 :I (‘,! , • r.X ,4. ""."--',ri,A.:,...,'';',•.1-,.•,445f...,'S•%;9•!f.:t I 1 V/4, ,17.:,..,...., . .I... 'g ' I.;hi-, '_-_ lig •C z:'1.., q -egira;MITI i .:. ,.•,2 r--........--,,':..4;•1LI.:.,,,)••••,' .:•,.4,14.•..,;,,,,..4,-,,,r,17,...47,1 •,., (. ,., ?, ',4 .1){..;,;(..^..4:7••••./r.';'^.'/•.;'<x(•.;•/„.'R',/1.,"%`..1.75.,"4:12, •-, — 7 ;: if I 43: .1 "Irffillaillo,ViiiiMeit: Als__=_Rolt___„_p.olot. ,•. ' p,-. ....:,,,,,,fp:irw.,,,:;,0J!,.*A-.:/tattt , --i 1 WPM icco.ALI•111 ....., • le l',:p iZ,,,0 :/ • ,.7 -.7: ..f.-:"•..- -.. ''. Ilarriallekie,• g"..!c,"72K,0 Ma ../..- it:''.. 7: 1• , /34e ?,•••I hal•„ . ? • :i ;-4.:..-„,.,:k.:. :,7,,:,ii.$..&,....;....",,,,4"0.,...7,t.-...i"Al; r:rd 1 1 cl I .- . • ii=umwErr-li,,,,-, nir ti_ C. •• t ../...,.4 • ..-,,,i.,,•;,,,,P14---.0..--.- • 4 Ar,.,,,.A.4ii, , 2, %, -,, •,-e ,... •---.ti.,--,1 . ,. .-..... .,.,..-.: .7.6 . if.:.%.4.1y,'.q..1 4.i• •-.1, -.4- . ' •S'' ,.,r-OFFiPrif6,37113F-r"efriiii)rWg,i,Ali,ip-A••;-• 0- ..,•/,••-,,,'J ,:•;...*.f. ; 114.. :.; ..1 1 i'•;7.7") i,•'.../:1.•4;-'1'?:./ .7...•:P i,17°‘'.:•q••;:i't,;r; •"=,'''''''l '',.• V1 LOT 12 1 .' 1.'6d\4.. 1 4, A ';:j'I'MV•Pr;'%•,13.+9 . I Vno%''l•r.t't Vfr?.,1:;ly,.;.;d1V;;.!,41/i•-'1'14.4' -74 F-P‘")--'1-5I • ',, .•,1 ,,.. ,.„ j _Ktf;fr.,•..r.ti4,.:..ii.,,,,..,41:.,5,),r.v,,,,,,,/,./4.;,,,i4-;,j1i t.,,,,;(;:.,;,,,,to,/,:.,,Ft,/,,/,..../‘(:,,.q,:,....,..t.4...(1,,r-E,/ ..;•,,,,1 i •:;.•,,..1K1 I #eamiM i i liliwit ' 1 ,''''.•.5 ri.!,:„.,r,/Y;;Pfli11,15-';','8 b•Arei.,..: 001,:tAill. 7 9" BLOCK 28 1•' ?‘ ,& ' ' ..,.' it 4/14.!•'•1 y'''',“ri1'4;1 'fr' Arg."y,,''',.?,Vrig'.•'.!?f'r4ir?'; ',.: /,)`",t:3.Y•/•17.7. r-,7. ',,1 , 'I .:. - ;;,,;•,,:,:i,,,,,!1',./17,...,77?:7vE•••••,(t51;,;:ti,,,AV•11.11 ,: 4, -• f 1`. . v!.•:..../.-,1t,,,.-''.....n::,:r..7:fie:qv:,;r.,i,.;:,;,:,4'.-5'1, ‘-,4 \ .i'."- -11,,, ---''.1P;'447;',--'..il .'"XfW..4‘,7.1',-;Vt.;:k.'1'4',i4}:,%,"-?//,ert*:47.,,'',.',,,jyr.Ir. .'=,%.,..;,-,: ''ir',%'4iA I ..171FIEM Ill 4'. •i.i.-I. ••, , ?..., ./,•,r,r-i,1 ..••••://'/•.•..4,...7:./'/• :I , , , 8 ' .r;,,,,;,-.•",..,•,,-'I+.."7.114:..-: -....i-4-,'„'';.".f.V-:,.,-,•,•;,•,;!,,', - 17 !- Lgui; i kre.:3 -4Eri-2,k's4,',•,,,,'....6':Ir ;.',',A.,,,id.,‘"r,.,',...,;WIV2i4',"°•"-""'`.•:!'11/,'%;',!•;‘';'i.4.1 r'','' ''''.-4'il IIPA 'I I ' ,, '., .' ). :.0'. ..,.77,.."-7. Vrt'•',' "••4 •f>"5;;,:411 , ,„ .:1, ,,... .• . ,•.,; fotl?,4P-:',..$Pijs;?;;P.,E.51,,fif .J, f...41/14/1,P,it<firr:; fr,•?,,,1'.,;,:r'',...;041--t::Z.,:l.:'',..; At. '.' • „ -.. : r,•-.....p:,,,v,,K?'•.::......, ....V.V4...a.,14 ,.•...t.:4,.,,,, --T17:Za---- e • t, =r47.,:••••.,''..,,,,,6,-.4i.wrc,•f•,,IT,:i.r...i.:„5,3-.0-...;:Tice.f.,,r/dso,o, -,•5 r1,16',1iAl;',%4L,';!;11Eilifkig 051415;)-'4'.,4.4iAL-&::- ...iv.:::.f. ' ,,,,..-:,-",;•,',:',',7.-:)5•:•!-:lt,. ,..:,,45,.41 .Fm...iz kr . 'A'',,,,r• ;?;r1J•1:•.:•,;,i.„.,.1:-,••,/!•,":".:11Mi,e4"4 _ „ ,e.., 4.71,,f77 ---pwig-gi..1, ,., ; \ it FP ‘E.a.... -... - • .---..,-, --/,,..4,.../... 1,_;,,,,,II , -— ''....•.....q,...-f4±..'2.712-2/." --51.-q-4Z.%Is LI 1' '. 1"''- miszt!goclur . . ,,' -::, . v,_. ... I tv.121- -"".,.._ 7!--_:- "••=4-'-47-P----'4'.7'------1. T-TT J• a• r• rpormir:-..-/r7ncrri,„trol,'..r.a.n-7 e--Inf,-.7rJLJ!!-•;;;',E,;;;It'll,f4,...'''' ''-'•;..-.'•• ii ' effi Li'1'T Tr•-.''7/4'.l'•;1•":4''73- t: .- .'''griLlii:TIA-Tr• -•-r2AVI,e71:141'.21>••';'-1•%'72',,10,,p'cl.,:3 6,,Awilitp 'il,:,,i.1,TIver:lifitr4.:-.--wiefigArixiirg ppm- ; ? .t.ut,., 4, , r;rirlY.,,r,,,•drip,,,.ifotlriTgL,%,,i1 17.3i44:14,-,rcif,t...p.A.-•.f 'A li,i, c,11:,...i.J.;,;•;•;IF ,. .,t4,7rir,•i• 4,t•':t ,•,• .,rt r I ... cl.. .4.!:4•'!,,,!4•1 !,•`' •!.'.' -'''!"'.•A4,7. ... !",:, A jr,.,i,ig4 ;.fil, 4,;,4.,E,,I.. kjy,if,.1 1,d‹,f ,f1,.., )k , / ., ,•,..1{..1....-:::,.t,,,,;,./nic,,w1,,,..41 ff:,,..,,tiv,,.•,,,,,,,..:7•';',:,: .1-,ollyr•zs:.,,,-r;;.„16,1 1,,,I•„:',.;...OP;p 'I •': m; ,•• , 1,.., .: ,., 1-%11 1 -•••••''X/e•' ';n111:1! '•- '/';:lk-1•10‘1.:2'a.ale--ilOVA4-1,7r1r?•*P':9'j 0 4 treeiV.:.%}`,'".19104.41t,' - 1:— • ' •Cf414..,,,,14/4,,Oliivi*,* .,:111i,;:r2it0.,:,: ;',t.':`,1,');,..i-,,,:,/-,g,..i.);-+t, :,,47,77.1 ,'f.:•.„,.',,.,...,.,..;it;,.: .f.-..;':.',''''' '-' z .... .. '...1 I:. ;.'.r.';,.•,,'? ;;'!'''',1,1 5i4f-,.... -:.17-1[/,',.':1,,,-....',...4P7,'=',, 7:!:?,:'?,,,-1;;r1,3...:;v,„",-,:y7,,1,,Xelik., ,;:.v.t.'4,44.*44,,-..y",;4;1., ..,.,, ",i...• 1 0.,p,gr,t.m,(4,•47,9.,11t'''.;:r:".'1,i''','„'`,;,`,.1,!.4.;,1%•' ,..'1;,,,.,t.'%,..,,,r.-,•',: •,';,'. •., '• "..i,. . ....,...', ... T v ': ; ,,... ! :, ,,,,, ,„,;,.;,/,/,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,k,,,...;,;,,,,,,•,',.,..,,..A.6:4.,..it;,,,•,:,:,, ,,..1?:,.,,,,;„1,,,t,,,f,;,:.k:,,,.1.,,,f.-,,,. ...v,;-;:l..:f,.4,:ii,4,, it+,-,:::r.:i.,k1',e4',1-4,,,,',4e•" ..,..4,,,.....t.,,,,..,....,......4.-...,,,:,,,,-*...;,,,.:......1'.!.,.ri.c.,,,:,..4,..:,!:.7..4:.!..,,,,:tv,..-4::,:.,:r.p,:...,,,,,,;,,,;;,. : c.. ... -;-:--,,,,,,•,.•. - -4 ,,,,5-..r;.o.,.... -:..„-.1,..,„,,rx..,,, ..1-417,„,,,,,,doti,,,,f;,,,;,p--1.,.,.;„,,..5..,;,„•.,..,-..,....,,,,-,7,,,,,..,,;,!/,;,*"..I,...5'i,,,,,,,:',,,,:e5V.,,,l- ',/ g P,/'''''':.,,f,.1:0:.:t.',',',11-M/4',,,,'';'',;:1171.:;Iii-!;4';):•••cfc;...1-,,,-(T -,-"-ki?,..Yi'.2.'';.;%, ,7;..'..i:,••5.".' '1..1%•;l':',‘.;•• l - ,,,•.;:i..,,,..,.,,,,...r.L:,..;' .:;.: ..1:17":1.4151.\`'f i'''''.4.1..014AL, -.P,,,,,g,:-.W..,/,..ek,4-, . '4,iy?„•"•••''t•r'rk:l. ,c,' I ‘,„,/,441.v.,,,,,,7„:„,/ 31.,,,;,,,,m11,..,„qi,,,4,ep,s,e• r,....v.,,,,,,[,....-,:107,...,,,,,,oz:,,....amfLriti ..o.,,,,:lre. '4 1".; 1,1,.. , .3 ., :111,1,,rwi.,j,„,4.:,,,,,,,,„ 1:7,.....„,,,,,,,,, „,.1„,..,,,,,,,,:,,, 1„,„,,,,,,„.„,.:,.,, ,,, „ . ,,, • [,,,,,,..,,,:.,..ii.,r,:1,5:11,:eiv,::/:,.v.i.,,ta rzi,I.,,i, ..7..,, ,-, ,..,—,,,,,621 11,2a, m '., "•'','End -.1 ';, I/ 1 ma •. 1. 4. t' kitii MG'',Al.....;''k..11.""' T.•LE .J.CA PM.P.J.;.1:1 "....'. .,...--Lniii.:J.,.....-I ex... ..:L.,.. ,,e 'e•C'' 'Illinnn. WI 0 " 'I' COKE', 1111,A! Mil. • 0 i I , . IIIIIII,EMI ui •I, lucZerli winsii,11,,l_.,WEIJIA.,1 8 .,. i• k 4. • IMIlnall'1, 5.:•1. SY ei,'• . • ..--...—.-.-..---'..e.- •,11,.. b •.. '•' .. . a ponlliVJAMM., '.:41.1. ....:17/ eh: t• • of L t. :-.5'••4_ :SY:,T. j•••_ „,:ar--_,..r— „J.-L.-n..7.1•- - :i..", di ..! 1'1 '1 ,..,' - ,- -- -- - - -.--"A"ff,t,....•• , ' -- ! ' i UV ii#14*1 ..W- • , IE TS, et Y.NO,LIP:41E0 {Immo : ii WM/MCI t a . . g .1 g , 1 '' 1 ///P IP INH".4111r )-- I.- t m......:,..,:aa.' , r, A• I'T -. a -j - =MI [ -i e- •J e- -J 1- ' i.. 4• . • 1., t: '' Z Itit: • RIFJA11,1()IT 1. SII/ENTIAI,C,ONI () ..1 p • r ,,,,YIA 4.:114,01i''„(11,07V,'SiltliNI,Aie,C()1 1)() 4,7, :r •- . -,•,, j. .141 t sag woo/ 1 if.l. 1) . ,1,1) ,,.ik ,,„,..-1,7,4„al, , .F:•5.71:•14413;•;.yr°'; 4 91:iT .-ti•'•2.,..''i' i : MR VEST All AVT1.7 olvENUF A ,:,' C.!5,0'IR1.1.1 •fls.:\ rl p ill rileo, .1.c.c.". _ -a Fair,li AT 1,11.1,3,l'ACW'VI , t.4 , •• 2. ...T4.....saw ammo......- W.e... Z. , -. -... ,..... f........• -.' C.024 7 I $0.#,C F.I .la, II 110 1.,„ ,..gi. 4 4 11.r.rE,.?1! A .,.. ...4 ,.._...._,. , ..rs, ..1,.....71r,.......11 FRRI !,WY I,FOR I.L g.4ii3t4•1E+W.Vir7ittittif..;1 iff titre•',,Etriii.4 riiiit fit• t.r 41.4 f,.1447F:3.i .• , `•, II •4Etif•I erftff _d•q* it$•141tiliii0.1774littiliPPistitigirr-Itt 1/Pee'E?•":iiiiit5S4 st )'' r • . . - • ...4.- , ... 6. , • e•• • .• • e It i,. e...e.•• ; . 7 i,,,i ..,a. ••%. ... it.• . . •4 , • !1;•4•0 Pi /9 Pa - V I ill ..!! ! •It.4 /0!,- •• ",.;.5;.! 1„, __ ,;_.4.!!•!..1,1,:;_4,,,trtmr„.;...,, ____ ._,_._ _ I __,,,A; _____ .„,,,_ L.--_7:rt 0:!,%Eti• _atr-"--. . --.`"'...." __tez4,.c .ii .2i. i, ,.;,,,, i , I.:,v.ri .•• 4,J n, \im -1,-; , --71,-E5-,- •1,1,I ral VI W ..16 6../7 ,..,k/t ir.6,,,, /a f ,Il,31 8 TO X22'.00' I TYp I -'• 7 . 411.7 Cl.c 1:1,,,rak r.'.77--- ••, _______I ___. ----- -- I Irale 1PPY -"TIM I IIIr.:I.CIS ES,-3P FL -- 1SaIIIII I P I.J.IE.T4[11,f .0 ' • `V•fg'-`!r"' I 1...,7,rx••••-m•Ill ITY I Pars ,T,,,,.,,,,,, is, CINI I arru. I Et, TR.1,7 I ,$)r,•+4;. IP'CURP,I GI TOP_ 1 1 , • I, II,,,': I, •1721._ 15,,,, ,!17.1(.1 __L_____Y_-!_1/...•Si.........._ET. •16,21______Pj,,,_ .,-c‘r,v.!,,..-,•n, ,,,L,...1, • 1 :7 II, -- r I 1••:L=.':2------7f-1-77-7;;;',777C -1\•'[-Aff.if- __ - --,•pl- cl".WEST ipLAN77, ,.c.2wUE_,.2.,. =___„ ..2... ,".,--_,.1.,-*'/4;f:r.ILL-...11.'"---,_7,7_,7171.._12_24_,.1.--c-1,,h2i,..„'-_,..I.,_ --- -1:71, --- - -i----'-.....-L-------1.—L---------- ---__ 1.117P...P... -----=.--_-..!•!--=-,==----- riMSli MA co IV,-r Alt1 ....r..11)Pf;' I V!,'.(4: rt-Tz nrc,c.voc --.:_-_---7-......=--- 1,. c,,,.,,c,j,7, IF C Pai,P-'a . '--- .7= -- r';':':r" I CPII Engineers,Inc. _ ACTIVITY MAME DAR. il crier. ei•.20. SHEET TICL SITE PLAN @G:p ALM Crre.Floni0A ..•••...."2...•.• 1,...K.Ina 1,2.-.... Dft-,:,--LE 113 MT DESIGIED DO DRAW DT: CHECKED no PWA CRJ PWA 112.--- APPROVED no PETER W.AOUART •• a i.144:•jp pi,4,,,.....,, DATE JCS Ho.Howe a or 4 ATLANTIC GROVE rt•IA41,./..0,1bral. ,• •,- ENGINEERS.INC. www ..1;‘;,1:7:7271:c's" PROJECT CONTROL REWRAP:1i NO. 3475 II° Aff.. Rtmstori nit: Hoeoto3 . .._ w . . .1,1 17-I rirt 1,i f,ie I., 1 .11• .11.1 f 1 1:0.1 I 13 , I 4 ',•;• 6 si4 .';' :,.`'S ' •r.I.'. 1@.) . ,,,.L. _ II i ; • 7 '=. -.tr.__ ___,-•-•-:-----ik. 01 Pt I 101 20 111 OCIC J6 /-1:1•1' ,:::;. . 4.;:-'4at -or.!,,;',„„", 7 E ' •11/1,10/MA OW/ .4,14' 1,', , I; -(n-.inl------- 4'i • - )1L 4 41-,,e.••411:1 API.*PK PrzePrle ffrl'_/ IF Ai' , 1 ' • I 1 A If:,., ; F• '1.1 ',pow)Pi i• ''. .7-71,1.47 mon)exc../ .- qw. , kl. '''-'.6 , . ih.,,111.1.'p.• i ..•• , erWC 1,.yeeeN1 nerplel'Z'ArAlr.roo.;,,,rtf.V./A// 3 r,.. 3 p t 21, i l' • .1 1 If\ 1 ,I.P.P6//i i 4.3,,,G..)._._. 'aPLIE0-` r- • ! '•' -- ' '•-• ,. 7 . I ,.„0- '-'-''•-'" ' I,' -7.7- --- ,3. f g --v.,- -.me-- t_r,s,67,44.7,17/ 91 i(3--.". 1 ;t:r•-•'•O. • ' .• ''' . ..1,/•• 1 1)7 4 ',, ,,,;•2 101 10 >: T, y .4 (A ,cI( .56 r I, , , 7 4.iiiL0044.4 CO•---14.171.0C( 211 131 OC1• 26 • • ; 1-41,, 436 ._.._,•.f_, ._ --. ,„„......., .......„,,.„.. ..4, ,,,..._...... , , _ IV:,-11-r ---246:1 ,V.rfM7,.:..m==•egi"I • ' r 1 ) 1•,., . ••• •-14 '7 ti''-.23../11.5 .5 - — kW . '15• '.41,13114tic5.4.13%;•i, --li-- •le. , , 01!... t(I,___.' 1 . g 'Will( . /"I •1( IP. '''• .- ..,a- sell l Il\- ) -.. . • . ' • t,'. ' . , .... , •'- O''' .11, --4' . ihh., argo-,-- 4g r, .. I,! ,7.1c r 1'sr —!TIT tif. ,.,..,•,1 •'• w,1's L ,, , •, 1... B :1 [--- •8 t( T2,,IP Vs,ri ; 1 .5400 17 .•, III , 3 .„:; [ —• -,,i,-,,,..64.• ,...,.i, ... . •,,„ ,,„,,P. ,42,..%4.,VtIr ati/4.rr ile....‘irks,.I , • t, 0 , ,,__ _ .., ,1.......:.._,A,...-7 4,-,.,„ ,.7... • ...•z. i r,:.t,..,.,,,,.b.. 4,,•,14e, °,64„f'" ' ' .5.7k•' w.)1• tor 5 .15: •j C.,-1 :., 1,':. % ii ., f=— 9 ,'."1- le,1,;;..,,,,,,,W;,X.,J, ..„.%.,Al fr,tirh• A`pAttf,,,r9 gi ''.`'El' 4--•..'"gal- ' ..Z . .1(MO(K 213 -t 101 11 ,. ]N 1 b MN IPA' !' !,,,,! IINCe 11 (71.0014 211 . t Ii111)',I 2,,,i11.0(lr' ...i,1:1 ; 1..tlf 17.%,4..,.. .t. ..;', 71.F . - 1,! 12 ... O. r , • ::-__ _ -_14441,..__L____-..r----_--.---.7i. •-11-7- il 1..1.‘ 6671 411f. '111'ne-C; :.. - - : --.I 1 ''E 41 .'1.1.1:14.' t.:- • 1-•,2-,-, • .t....................4 ti fr F,09:74;l'i 7 It .i :,,, ,i 1_8...,,,•x ., .i".-• .1 till....',.,,,,. ...., ,4 ,0441, .. .. 4 , . .. ..........."-..,c " ' • '4 Lailipu 7 fid., fik..qi /,,..4),,,• .• lit i •',.: iN- . ... .;? ,,, i,'.. •.,•._ __,_f.,:....,.. . :1, _., - ,,, -\\ - (F) '''--r-•401.11.--Iii.. . '• ',Ails, ,_ _ ili . 1 . . n Tr„,ity KW.,7,- ",',:.11. or•!i,,° ,ix.'2_4,:.:_t :.• :,-, ; ,, _ F.! ' ' ••• (gt- '/-,''''-''''• • -''': y''; v.). • ----' :...f-,-,:____„-- - . " t 7 ,i n'i. ', 1 '; `.',,Y.L114.1f.f.1'.•:',"',?•'''••'.lila il?:‘,1i. • ••-, , T\-, riFf,,,.,„_,- i 7 ' 1 .,--7 0'•n___r---"„_WIN- ,..-.-..-,,-^ . a, ,7I 1 gm...6 ifiAl 4_ . ,./ ,,: .:„ ,. , , ..1.. .. 1, :-.. t /).,..rx_.,,..,„ .,.i., ,,, A _., 1 , . _ ., .i.,.... 1 „ L „ ., i-,.1i,,0 t.'•ii'0 it. .,• 7° ..,,„ .It.1 .. J_•22...11 6; - ri; FLIT? tit.To-,i'il- I 1 I 'iF } g L.itig 0. .. . 1 t5,-,,,,,./ 1.id " 6 4..7.'..Y.iii; ; ; 101 12 • .. C- \ • , 1 ftf f..?,,, ..1 },:t 9'.-.- '' ', '; i 2 •4: ' in ^7...).4 ,' riii. -''. ''171 OLlf 217 [t !1. L'i inr.• . V" t.. l' C PI'l Cr.•'4 di i i 41i9I• it of% „ • .. 0, Vy:. 4* t I 0 kIP if.., n'Ii4Pcilit 9 tikliap IFWiliti ; 7 it_•./ . ".7..'‘,.. . . ;I'111610-LN Ann,„f,era.:.1 i.ler-L11440... ,' 1 - : flz'giljte341(4.4r' :,,,IL42141''uniAsii"'-.4i.-.,'XrPYL•41.• ; '. % •: "(0. 1 tlf,(A „,.„-, ,..,-..„ ...... .I, .,• ,•r I WILK 4. , , ,, -I IP/. • ' "' '",rk•• ,•• ir. -r.9-29U,•;11,9;.••''--7' '••• !) N 1 ...? : `'17P3s,-,,701:41:01•,1“rev ig/"1:;1!;fitt/•.:1, ,: :/fif (11 741 11.,i- i 4ilit ,!?,1‘. ..,i' I ,,,,,, J.16, „r" r 1., ..i i cp,- e,• • ,.." . A,!').,f;i:•11 If:40'1r, I:i''''' : . •H• •, ,,,,,,...J., •f• ., I 4 ......, - < • ,..t • 64''. ' - I ' '"i'" e ii, tr( i plIr** _:,-' 7 7 -\ '41 . ,•KY 1 ' • ' • '' ......... 'I F••1•,,.q ill ,I.7., 1•,i', 4 _ --717.1C--- .. -. . ;Pi, i. ;7(i. e:„.i I 4•,....1..--.1'.1.L.21.1!'_, ,V1D g x,' . '.''' ' c•- • 'n'. ':.•Nt:! ; ,=----,, v ....;,. u. -oc.i. -,-- -,, - : • ,i.,,: .-!,4 .f;4-44,-=-4-•,14•01' '-; •T'- R-!1, .'"'"' L .;;.-7-e.t.7,T,I74.:.;.17-' iv.i'ql 5 ,,,:i ' . •Fil:Fr'.71.1.1'it,-;-.tty.. ,te ei,,,,,. p, leg 1:1,,, • el:L._...t.r.._......._/4,3 if_• '1,7,7:08•031..,,,nrj,,A"..ia •'.', .1 \ --,..„. 1, --- • i, .• Ar, • , ..,„1_ _____--------. _II !x,•••••• _——____— = . _ - , ..„,_.- ..- -7 : ..'.... --I2 .-0_-, 4, Vir,: i., .ij,, 17 1,,, .,9 ,, '',:' qt,' • I,•*I,. ''.. ' •..LN.-...,,, i' tW ,!Al4i1117117; ..,s, ,,, qt .....•,.._ •••“r,' _..„.,,, , — r-,:."_i_ 4- _..„ ...:1-7..=....—r_,,,,..n ../,,,,e_ --s.svir.""„,if,..,;,;:, ,, ,",;„ •._ pa_ j_ .,..,„k.,.:_•_ . , ,.., .,,,A7, 7 1,7,C;':.71-114=--. ,,.,.;kTrii=r- % C,Ji, ,,,'.7,8,r*".. r'" ',, 7 -)4 E. .iji, „ , it.. /,.., .,.. ,... ,', . .., '0 . ,, Aft 1,11'9 • 47:.A• 4,.1. ir j, ;' 3., '0' P2 3 '1 ,• : : ; 0. MI ' I„ 7 t., k ei, "„ I:, . ,.. . ,.. ,,I, r,,, _ „ (0. , ,,, 7 20 , • , f, , , l ,,y.. .: ,„., ,„„.—,pc !,i.• ', „„i,„ '.i,f 1,, '''. :',,,.'.:."3"i 4,7 trii. •••,1,,, Annwr • , ,! ; , ‘,,Lea l'; .inr tr.• .iiiiiier ,. y..tl.•-,I.•4,9,1),y Lroihe ;:;,,. 1, woft I .gy ,•. . ,,I. •„,„ I., ig.1,., , , ,, • i••••'',,,,,, ...,.. - -,-tra,'-'-` I,V,.'4 ",''',? 111'441" Al"' r'rf,'•!1.•.:,/,y,,A1111 , ..',4- ").,r., ...r.i 'r'r'li t:i',..111•Itr• i i 1 : 1,1.'',,•i 1 1:•.;;;•:,'I N 3:;,r ,JP ra.' i.. ••gh .; • •:r.f.if1.3_V e4 .. ES' ' '..•1' '. .,CR :1,4... I • ,, .,.„ ;Ly,,,t_:LA frei 42",,11 .'-•' :'',1" ......e=_;_!.4.'"4....':lfry;•4.-!.._.- ,' ", ...i,-...-:....-A,t,. ' ."•:,' ••:::, f22''";,'•••.'i•i;tilt410 10/•''••;;(1..11,;%•''',11%,i`.1)'1,1'•''.';',%3,4. irA'ki,l'iil''.';frl, ;;rji' , ,l!. 11 ..•' ''•'.,,"..,.,.:...,;.t!;, ..?,,f,p,„1,1.4,1,41'r.thitiv toie V)...,!:4!::,• -,!:',,,,1-45,,,,,,,,,,y,A,,,'”',;:.',I: ,' ,,.;:!„......,...,. .4: ., •. ..,4 :- 4.8!hf.). ,• -nee- -nee, or--. .497, "P„.:!•,A . _ ,I,. 7-lle,•W. ,,,,,•71.?f" i..: •, .. enr. .,..l .,.., NO J..... .4,1ftft.. 4 -, :4. _ ,er ,,, . . ,. i s eer,' e ,,. .1; I:, '•'. ' 41 ri,• F;',.' .''A A ,!, -' e,'• ''', lihi'. II' ',' ,A );.! ',r:;-).-7.74/. ,,.:i;, i LI A' 10 I cii E. . •1• ...' ii w , ' '' ''.c. ';'," t• "' 'if* ' ,,t,I'.' I, Ill 9 III iv.... 4, '4 ,,fi Aft vs. 1,' '', . • N.,[Ai!.1•,:! 1 ,...',. !,".ha':',:. .4. 1,.,,hq r6F.7, .A tA 4. tf 1„.4 :t, a :.;' i I 1 • . , --J.. r. • I ... P -,,li•/6,1.4._ .. MI.1-I. ,e 2 IIE n. '- Immo"!smonsolin!, _ I '':'::.;-: :'7,• ....•••• • -'41' • ..... ,,.._!!....F7.• „ ... —• • - (11-1--- -B,. 7---r-f •--.. I-R Tai 1_.„411 -t' i '.; :•\ tt ii11.,t 1 3-71 • ..-. • ' . -•• ..... _ . got t i deCil ft.t_r_W__ 4.' • • rOr w• fn . IV !?.s 0 MI",bet 1 l ARV - • 1 1.-`i-", '.7" .,,...n91 _ 9, _1 iffilif9MP 41 9, a rei NIIIII1AD .•• • ill 1,0 11 , I ,•; ; C9 1 , . rr Pseiclf-\1/1, k',,, .,...:II Um/ft FR •• • • • .. _...._ 10 WO • / ,7,-,.10 afigrip,rocr It S WN'I'l 1,CO 1)(1 \I, t . 'RAC ,,f',;41f? '''14.1 Kii,13f1"1,711,',q11)DCT'AT,1 orvI)o :;.::""Ahire id! ..,.. '3, . 0 5/0'MO', oi.onn:Pan, wAr l,I I fe KS .-.II 4,•/•31,11-..46,90p1 • ts ift.01lIl CA.0 U:014 1 ,11 „1! : • /A, n..I.:A au . ... - ----.......ii / s es;4.nsiim•-• •••l• . ' i.),..C.,st;tzar:4 ; -,•••,,,ww .., il. ' .i t- • 41111-1 ea .,03'i i 1 .... :. >, tit.,.,. ./te, / I A -1 .e,i'it 01 deli•wdiao r,.--Reir.rop,;"4 . - N, .. , ,,...,- ,,,,. ,,,,„... ,,. . ,,,, „POI• 1.0 ale .21.(.2_ , ..) 16 I /let.,_ .1--,:_-r'A-At .1-i-gi=-7-''.._r_ 't" _ ---'-'!!72.1.--..r.-_,._--,...,_,\ _ .‘,.±... t Ft.. ,.r,'„„, • . _ _ _--,. ., _ „ _ . ,, n, _ .,,,„•, 1139/ ,. --1.416 V. 1 _ _ ti'Iffil/ --”ItI7 ,17.x, it 7,6 e, \ ,.._ • 4.1am.nt ./..'_-: ri-T,14,r i „1, i'" 1 1." I -I 1,.4P,„_. , 1• rC 150001 II?)101S . ...,1 ' ° „Ord __ELI curnn, 10//6/tea'I NS.79-39,1,100,Se -7----- " 22•le.0160A:e ri 117.93rA7LAW IC AVEME Pf 5100/P/A -“IrgrlAgel'il'i'!'.1gt? 0 et 00.1177Pc., ......_ g17'C20,12 a cot .10 00 ell01 I I SI, -.'2,,E.f-',.-_-•=3---.7---r- .-- I-- "V-,-,-,,ii.----D ,,,,,,,I 1.' • ) co' 7-5' 11-"rr--------"-'71T9;17(.. L-Agrv'An'' ) y,•.....41E r3f.,:iirii16,1116, /IVI:Ntlf._______-----1.-----------.----7./ _tlft EP.-....,• --..,-- ''6" ---- ir f4--I__ - llin ,' •• nI ,„ — 1,S110ie, 12 re . fittnr99,/119 _. rliin •• . . . . . . . . • ...,.. . . . . .... •....::.;::.: . . . ..., . .•,....• ..__._ - kill tti l'91 ilil �- -- t-.1"* �`' #�a It"--Fit ri t p."a�ji-lv.:, � '° e'er^°, k4 ore _ __ _ _ t 5 a Eq yII F}a liS" p{j p {§q lgQ6j�}$i{'f y�! ( I ( doe = •�¢_s_a_._aA - Il it" uliiip.at.mu_is tr�11.i�1tiyZill uintitili 7 u tt Z +r ,ter .t„>'f f 1i R i d ifiii.r 7 llu _ ..Q• doe ,,,,. . c �._ o �l yid uiI uu_ U& 1 = o. o k O11 I.Iptl Il VI rvl�l 9f 1 11 Af 1 _.__ o ➢. n . — n - - .— _� - - - ___ = ii2w REAR ELEVATION • • F --r La [Di ul in rdmi....-:-.......,-- PP ' ©-- L� f,tn -_ .B Q Q u ill � MI --- ------- _.. M1 nil, I _ill t el-'Kez(Zeg 7 147I I=?-? da-i L-1{ ' YI { t I LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION w Ljll1 � 6 H 81 E 5 F , • g - $ g iiii 8. ° 141 posh'1 {dl l / l(1 Gn°9 i "' 11!iL!!L _v of AKrSLEE Wm E q a arv, _ °� i 8 ,!j�}j�( ta. *ba3_- —_-- _ ' . .: id 1- o- 07--- ff ....ii .. i ._.. = i — - -- - :.s _:, id iji : in- 13 IITI �t - o- Cal ►� 0 4T ' cJU I I J 1 (i-1 i till I] 1C'a{jI�}'fl' • f1I711�111 i i U-_ t "*® � n'_ _ .._. —.` ..—L•— L--C-4 4�T[ b�C�P T J+1 , W Mom.. ill = — — —n— — >1iI{11 �7 n u IA II -17 iT T rL r=rl�� `'kI `" 1 .I I)1 - !1OUILDINGJ� — r -Y J I I �.. ELEVATIONS ./‘-1-1'r,111.t-' j'1 ..(-.• 1-0(,1_., FRONT ELEVATION ....,