HPB-03-19-03 SIGN Ili
1993
2001
Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting of
MARCH 19, 2003
PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ORGANIZATION ITEM
/11 • 1-1/toPlz_ 444Y-4- tvoezo-54i/ntl
)/e/Le
l •i
lij P/7'9� (//e14'
�,
3/19/03
MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PUBLIC H E A R I N G
MEETING DATE: March 19, 2003
LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
I. ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:02 P.M. Upon roll call it
was determined that a quorum was present.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gloria Elliott, William Branning,
Jim Keavney.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gail Lee McDermott, Rhonda Sexton, Francisco
Perez-Azua.
STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay
Ms. Jamison read into record the quasi-judicial regulations.
II. CERTIFICTAES OF APPROPRIATENESS
A. Handelsman Yellow Building, 85 SE 6th Avenue, Individually
Listed Historic Property, Mark Marsh, Authorized Agent.
Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is that of
approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class
III Site Plan Modification, Landscape plan, Design Elements, and
Waiver Request for the development proposal for 85 SE 6th
Avenue, the Handlesman Yellow Building, pursuant to LDR
Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c).
Ms. Shay presented the proposed project and entered the project
file and her resume into record.
Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication. As no one
declared such communication, Ms. Shay reviewed the proposed
project including the site visibility triangles at the corner of North
Federal Highway and SE 1st Street and the site visibility triangle
between the refuse container and public parking lot to the north of
the property.
Mr. Marsh was present to represent the project on behalf of the
applicant. Mr. March declared that he was unaware of an
alternative location for the refuse container but he would work with
staff to find an alternative as the layout of the property is restrictive.
Mr. Branning expressed his concern with locating the refuse
container within view of North Federal Highway (SE 6th Avenue).
Ms. Shay concurred that this was not a desirable location.
After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by
Ms. Elliott and passed 4-0 to approve a waiver to LDR Section
4.6.14(A (2), to reduce the site visibility triangle at the intersection
of SE 6th Avenue and SE 1st Street, from 40' to 18', based upon
positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5).
After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by
Mr. Keavney and passed 4-0 to approve the Certificate of
Appropriateness and the associated Class III site plan modification
for 85 SE 6th Avenue, Handlesman Yellow Building, based on
positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance
Standards), and LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings) and the
policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following
conditions:
1) Address all Site Plan Technical Items and submit three (3)
copies of the revised plans.
2) That the refuse enclosure be relocated so that it does not
reduce the existing site visibility triangle at the intersection of the
municipal parking lot driveway and the alley.
3) That a photometric plan and decorative lighting detail be
provided.
After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by
Mr. Keavney and passed 4-0 to approve the COA for the landscape
plan for 85 SE 6t" Avenue, Handlesman Yellow Building, based
upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject
to the following condition:
1) Address all Landscape Plan Technical Items and submit three
(3) copies of the revised plans.
After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by
Mr. Keavney and passed 4-0 to approve the COA for the design
elements for 85 SE 6th Avenue, the Handlesman Yellow
Building, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections
4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k).
B. Cueto Residence, 415 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park
Historic District, Bulldog Fence Company, Authorized Agent.
-2- HPB Minutes 3/19/03
Ms. Jamison swore in Ms. Louisa Cueto.
Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is
consideration of a COA request for the installation of a green, vinyl
coated, chain link fence on a contributing property, pursuant to LDR
Section 2.4.6(J).
Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communication. With no
communication declared, Ms. Shay presented the proposed project
and entered the project file into record. As the property lies at the
corner of North Swinton Avenue and NE 5th Street, the installation
of the proposed green vinyl, chain link fence is not permitted along
the rights-of-way and could not be administratively approved. The
applicant is now before the Board for reconsideration.
Ms. Shay recommended that a masonry wall or wrought iron
looking fence be installed. Otherwise, the applicant could enclose
the area to the south between the house and the south property
line and at the rear from the house to the east property line.
Ms. Shelly Cueto and Ms. Louisa Cueto were present to represent
the project.
After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by
Mr. Keavney and passed 4-0 to approve the COA 2002-147 for the
installation of a vinyl coated, chain link fence on the contributing
property at 415 North Swinton Avenue, based positive findings
with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach
Design Guidelines subject to the following conditions:
1) That no fence material be installed at the property abutting NE
5th Street and the property line abutting North Swinton Avenue
and no fencing be installed along the west property line.
2) That the 17.8' section of fencing be green, vinyl coated chain
link and fully screened by a hedge except that a 4' wide wood
gate may be installed.
3) That the proposed fence at the carport be 4' high green, vinyl
coated chain link fence.
Ill. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Public Comments:
None
-3- HPB Minutes 3/19/03
B. Report from Historic District Representatives:
None
C. Board Members:
None
D. Staff:
There is nothing on the agenda for April 2, 2003. The meeting will
therefore focus on the review of the design guidelines.
Brian Shutt, assistant City Attorney, will also be present at the
meeting of April 2nd to clarify the term "demolition" in the
preservation ordinance.
Ms. Shay is currently working on an LDR amendment to update the
tax abatement section and will get information to the Board
regarding the elimination of the HPB color chart.
Ms. Jamison inquired about Ocean City Lofts and the old "ice
house" on the property. Ms. Shay had not heard about the building
but will follow up on its status.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 6:55
P.M.
The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for
March 19, 2003, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on
April 16, 2003.
If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then
these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and
approval, which may involve some changes.
-4- HPB Minutes 3/19/03
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The action before the Board is that of approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness which
incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 85 SE 6th Avenue,
the Handlesman Yellow Building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c):
❑ Class III Site Plan Modification;
❑ Landscape plan;
❑ Design Elements; and,
Cl Waiver Request.
The subject property is located at the northeast corner of SE 6th Avenue (northbound
Federal Highway) and SE 1st Street.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is comprised of Lots 12, 13 and 14, Block 117, Town of Linton, and
consists of 0.39 acres. The property is zoned CBD (Central Business District) and is
designated as an individually listed historic property. The property contains a two-story
commercial building (formerly a single family residence), an office building (illegally
converted garage), a carport, and a two-story apartment building with two, one bedroom
apartment units and one, two bedroom apartment unit.
The single family house, now a restaurant, was built in 1903, remodeled in 1918 and
was designated a historic building (traditionally known as the Blank House) on June 6,
1994. In 1947, the two story apartment building (2,224 sq. ft.) containing three
apartments and a garage was constructed at the southeastern portion of the site. In
1950, a garage was constructed on the northeast portion of the site and the garage
associated with the southeastern apartment building was converted into additional living
area. A carport, between the apartment building and garage, was built in 1954. The
apartment building, carport, and garage are considered non-contributing due to their
lack of architectural integrity.
In 1995, the Historic Preservation Board approved a Certificate of Appropriateness and
associated site plan for the conversion of the 2,137 sq. ft. single family residence to a
retail establishment, conversion of the existing 1,027 sq. ft. garage to two offices, along
with construction of a second floor addition accommodating a two bedroom apartment,
construction of a nine space pea rock parking area at the southwest corner of the site,
and installation of associated landscaping, walkways, and refuse area. The single
family residence was subsequently converted to retail use and the garage was
converted to offices, however neither building permits were obtained for the conversion
of the garage nor was the parking area installed. Therefore, the two new offices are
considered illegal uses.
In October 1995, the two-story historic building was converted to a restaurant, with the
second floor serving as storage area.
Meeting Date: March 19, 2003
Agenda Item: II.A.
HPB Staff Report
Handlesman Yellow Building -Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements
Page 2
During its meeting of May 2, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and
approved a Class III site plan modification for the conversion of the 1,027 sq. ft. garage
into two offices, construction of a 600 sq. ft. concrete outdoor dining area on the south
side of the restaurant, construction of an exterior staircase on the north side of the
2,137 sq. ft. restaurant, installation of an eight space asphalt parking area at the
southwest corner of the property with one handicap parking space on the north side of
the property, and installation of associated landscaping, walkways and refuse container
area. While the proposed project was approved by the Board, the project was not
undertaken. Approval for the project expired on November 2, 2002.
The applicant is now before the Board for consideration of a Class III site plan similar to
that which was previously approved which includes: the conversion of the garage into
two offices, construction of a new asphalt parking lot, installation of a handicapped
ramp, and installation of associated landscaping and walkways.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The development proposal involves the following:
o Conversion of the one-story, 1,027 sq. ft. garage into two offices;
❑ Construction of a ramp addition to the existing handicapped accessible ramp to the
east of the two-story 2,137 sq. ft. restaurant;
o Provision of a patio area (formerly driveway) surrounded by a 5' high shadowbox
fence on the east side of the garage;
❑ Installation of a nine space asphalt parking area (including one handicapped
accessible parking space) at the southwest corner of the property; and,
o Installation of associated landscaping, walkways and refuse container area.
SITE PLAN MODIFICATION ANALYSIS
COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS:
Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be
addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development
application/request.
CBD Zone District Development Standards:
The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Sections 4.4.13(F),
(G)(2), and Section 4.3.4(K) as they pertain to the CBD zone district:
HPB Staff Report
Handlesman Yellow Building-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements
Page 3
Required Provided
Building Height (max.) 48' 12'-23'
Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 0' 15.5'
Side (Interior) 0' 12.6'
Side (Street) 0' 13.2'
Rear 0' 11.1'
Open Space 0% 44.6%
LDR Chapter 4.4.13(G)(1)(Parkinq):
Parking
Parking for this development proposal is only being assessed as it relates to the
conversion of the garage to offices, relocation of the garage spaces, and provision of a
handicapped accessible space. The existing 2,137 sq. ft. historic building has been
utilized as a restaurant, which is also the proposed use. The first floor will be utilized for
dining and kitchen space area while the second floor will be utilized for storage only.
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13 (G?(1)(a) within that portion of the CBD bounded by
Swinton Avenue on the west, NE 1s Street on the north, the Intracoastal Waterway on
the east, and SE 1st Street on the south, parking requirements for all non-residential
uses, except restaurants, shall be one space for each 300 sq. ft., or fraction thereof.
The parking required for the creation of new floor area shall also include the
replacement of any previously required parking which may be eliminated. Based on the
information above, the two new offices within the illegally converted 1,027 sq. ft. garage
require four parking spaces and the replacement of two spaces eliminated with the
conversion of the garage (6 spaces) thus, requiring 6 parking spaces total. The
construction of a nine asphalt parking lot therefore meets the parking requirement.
LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations:
Site Lighting
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.8, site lighting is required for new development proposals.
Site lighting locations have been noted on the site plan and landscape plan however,
specific fixture details have not been indicated for the property. A decorative light fixture
must also be provided. In addition, a photometric plan must be provided to meet the
requirements as outlined in LDR Section 4.6.8. These items have been attached as
conditions of approval.
Site Visibility - Intersections
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.14(A)(2), when a property abuts the intersection of two
public rights-of-way, all landscaping within the triangular area [two (2) sides of the
triangle being 40' in length along the abutting public right-of-way lines, measured from
their point of intersection, and the third side consisting of a line connecting the ends of
HPB Staff Report
Handlesman Yellow Building-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements
Page 4
the other two lines] shall provide unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 3' and
6' in height.
Waiver Request and Analysis
At the intersection of SE 6th Avenue and SE 1st Street, a reduced sight visibility triangle
from the required 40' to of 18' is proposed. The applicant has requested a waiver to the
reduce the site visibility requirement.
The applicant has provided the following justification for the waiver request:
We are of the opinion that the waiver should be granted, as USI, Federal
Highway (SE 6th Ave) is one way from the south to the north at this
junction of SE 6th Ave and SE 1st Street, and that all motorists will be
looking south as no traffic will be from the north.
Prior to granting a waiver, the Board shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver:
a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area;
b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities;
c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or,
d) Does not result in the granting of a special privilege in that the same waiver
would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another
applicant or owner.
The site visibility triangle encompasses two parking spaces within the proposed nine
space parking area at the southwest corner of the site (the intersection of SE 6th Avenue
and SE 1st Street). Landscaping at this corner of the site also encroaches into the sight
visibility triangle, however unobstructed cross visibility between a level of 3' and 6' has
been provided. As SE 6th Avenue (northbound Federal Highway) is currently one-way,
reduction of the site visibility triangle at this intersection is not a serious concern and
can be supported as proposed.
Granting the waiver would not negatively affect the provision of public facilities or affect
the neighboring area and will not result in the granting of a special privilege, as the
waiver could be supported in similar circumstances. Based upon this analysis, the
waiver request can be supported.
Site Visibility - Dumpster Enclosure
The applicant proposes to locate the 6' high refuse container enclosure at the northeast
corner of the property adjacent to the driveway of the City's public parking lot (to the
north). Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.14(A)(1), the area on both sides of an accessway
formed by the intersection of each side of the accessway and the public right-of-way line
with two (2) sides of each triangle being twenty (20) feet in length from the point of the
intersection and the third side being a line connecting the ends of the other two (2)
sides. Thus, the dumpster will encroach into the site visibility triangle. Site visibility is
currently reduced due to an existing patio fence/enclosure. It is therefore necessary to
HPB Staff Report
Handlesman Yellow Building-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements
Page 5
relocate the proposed refuse container in order to accommodate the appropriate site
visibility at this location. This has been attached as a condition of approval.
Sidewalks
Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B) (1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-
way adjacent to the property. A 5.5' concrete sidewalk exists within the SE 6th Avenue
right-of-way and a new 5'6" concrete sidewalk is proposed within the SE 1st Street right-
of-way. It is also noted that an internal walkway has been proposed between the offices
and the proposed parking area. Therefore, the sidewalk requirement has been met.
Site Plan Technical Items:
The following technical items must be addressed prior to issuance of a building
permit.
1. The proposed elevation for the catch basin north of the parking lot is greater than the
surrounding grades. Thus, the elevation of the catch basin must be lowered
accordingly.
2. Proposed drainage does not appear to work arrows do not agree with proposed
grades, please note how this will be accomplished on the plans.
3. Provide a typical cross section from building to adjacent right-of-way or adjacent
property at all property lines. Pay particular attention to grade differential from
proposed site to existing adjacent properties and show the existing grades on
adjacent property.
4. Provide two copies of a Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to and during construction
of all sites, the permitee shall implement and maintain all erosion and sediment
control measures included in the required Pollution Prevention Plan.
5. Submit a photometric plan and decorative lighting detail.
6. Modify parking calculations to reflect the asphalt parking area only.
7. Note the material to be used for the construction of the nine space parking lot on the
site plan.
8. Submit a detail of the handicap ramp including a detail of the hand railing.
9. Remove that portion of the concrete driveway apron to the east of the office building
which is attached to the alley and outside of the fenced area.
10. Roll-out carts are stored on the east side of the existing fence, adjacent to the alley.
These should be relocated to a designated area and must be screened.
11. Provide a recorded Declaration of Unity of Title combining the lots, prior to issuance
of a building permit.
HPB Staff Report
Handlesman Yellow Building-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements
Page 6
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Currently, extensive landscaping exists on the site. With the installation of the nine
space parking area at the southwest corner of the property, additional landscaping is
proposed. The proposed landscaping includes Live Oaks, Sabal Palms, Coconut
Palms, and Alexander Palms, along with Silver Buttonwood and Cocoplum hedges. The
proposed underplantings consist of Yellow Allamanda, Croton, Pink Hibiscus, Downy
Jasmine and Liriope. A large Mango tree exists in the center of the property and will
remain along with many Citrus trees, which exist on the site. The proposed landscape
plan will be in compliance with LDR Section 4.6.16, provided that the technical items
listed below are addressed.
Landscape Technical Items:
The following technical items must be addressed prior to issuance of a building
permit:
1. The landscaping, as proposed, does not comply with the minimum native
landscaping requirements as the Liriopes and Mango trees are not native.
2. Per LDR Section 4.6.16(E)(1), xeriscape principles shall be utilized in landscape
designs and installations. The utilization of drought tolerant plant materials and the
grouping of plants with similar water requirements are required.
3. The landscape plan must be signed and sealed by a registered landscape architect.
4. Liriope was shown within a cloud on the plant list with a number one within a triangle.
This symbol was shown where sod is proposed in the right-of-way, as well as other
areas throughout the site. Please clarify.
DESIGN ELEMENTS
Development Standards:
LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k) "Development Standards" provides
guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or
addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as
follows:
(E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within
a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated,
demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time.
(E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration,
reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or
HPB Staff Report
Handlesman Yellow Building -Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements
Page 7
structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility
standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing
non-contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if
any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a
designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form,
proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location
of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to
the non-contributing building, structure, or site.
(E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated
historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but
is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the
façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in
surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district.
Garage Conversion to Offices
The proposal involves the conversion of the one-story garage to offices. It is noted that
this conversion was completed without permits and therefore considered an illegally
established use. The non-contributing, 1,027 sq. ft. masonry vernacular structure is
located at the northeast corner of the property. Constructed of concrete block, the
structure displays various architectural details with its flat, built-up roof, aluminum frame
awning windows, divided light French doors with sidelights, Colonial shutters, shed style
window and door awnings, and stucco exterior. The proposal consists of the addition of
decorative trim along the top of the roof line on each of the elevations. This decorative
element compliments the frame construction of the adjacent historic building and
enhances the appearance of the structure.
A concrete driveway apron is attached at the east side of the building which originally
provided access from the alley into the garage. As the apron is no longer needed for
use as an office, it is recommended that the concrete apron be removed as the area is
currently used as an outdoor patio area for the office and has been enclosed with 5'
shadowbox fencing. This has been attached as a condition of approval.
Refuse Container Area
The proposal includes the installation of a refuse container area in the northeast corner
of the property, adjacent to the proposed office building. The refuse container will be
enclosed within a six (6) foot high concrete block wall with stucco exterior and metal
frame, cedar panel gate. The container will be angled for access from the alley.
Cocoplum hedging is proposed adjacent to the refuse container enclosure. While the
design is appropriate, the dumpster enclosure must be relocated as it is within the sight
visibility triangle.
Handicap Accessible Ramp & Internal Walkways
The project also consists of the construction of a ramp addition to the existing wood
handicap accessible ramp and installation internal concrete walkways. The ramp,
located to the east and adjacent to the two-story building, will provide access from the
HPB Staff Report
Handlesman Yellow Building-Class III Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements
Page 8
north and south of the property into the restaurant via the existing wood deck centered
on the east elevation. The slope of the ramp will be 1:12 which will facilitate the need for
hand railing, however no detail has been submitted. This has been added as a condition
of approval.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c)(Class III Site Plan Modification), a Class III
site plan modification is a modification to a site plan which represents either a
change in intensity of use, or which affects the spatial relationship among
improvements on the land, requires partial review of Performance Standards
found in LDR Sections 3.1.1 and 3.2.3, as well as required findings of LDR Section
2.4.5(G)(5).
Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5 (G)(5) (Findings), with a Class III site plan
modification formal findings under Section 3.1.1 are not required. However, a
finding that the proposed changes do not significantly affect the originally
approved plan must be made concurrent with approval of a Class III modification.
The development proposal involves a conversion of an existing 1,027 sq. ft. garage to
offices and the installation of a new parking area with associated walkways and
landscaping. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), this minor modification does not
significantly impact the findings as they relate to consistency with the Future Land Use
Map, Concurrency or the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with the Land Development
Regulations was discussed earlier in this report. The development proposals minor
impact on Concurrency items is discussed below.
Traffic
The subject property is located within the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception
Area) designation area, which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD, and West
Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas
from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance.
Therefore, a traffic study is not required for concurrency purposes, however a traffic
statement is necessary to keep a record of trips approved in the TCEA and for
calculation of traffic impact fees. The applicant has submitted a statement which
indicates that the 1,027 sq.ft. office conversion will generate 37 average daily trips.
Solid Waste Requirements
The proposed 1,027 sq. ft. office conversion will generate 2.77 tons of solid waste per
year [(1,027 sq.ft. x 5.4 lb./sq.ft./year = 5,545.8 lbs/2,000 lb. = 2.77 tons)]. The Solid
Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of service
standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021.
HPB Staff Report
Handlesman Yellow Building-Class III Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements
Page 9
REVIEW BY OTHERS
Community Redevelopment Agency
At its meeting of December 12, 2002, the CRA Board reviewed and recommended
approval of the development proposal.
Downtown Development Authority
At its meeting of December 18, 2002, the DDA Board reviewed and recommended
approval of the development proposal.
ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION
The development proposal involves the conversion of a 1,027 sq.ft. garage to two
offices with the construction of several site improvements including the construction of
an nine space parking lot, ramp addition to the existing handicapped accessible ramp,
and installation of associated landscaping, walkways, and trash container enclosure.
The proposal will be consistent with LDR Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) of the
Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance
with the Land Development Regulations will be obtained provided the conditions of
approval are addressed. The proposal provides for the legal conversion of the offices,
while also providing the required parking and accessibility.
Further, the elevation change to the non-contributing structure will enhance the property
and compliments the design elements found on the historic two-story restaurant. Given
this, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections (E)(4), (E)(7), and
(E)(8)(a-k).
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
A. Continue with direction.
B. Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class Ill site plan
modification, landscape plan and design elements for 85 SE 6th Avenue,
Handlesman Yellow Building, based upon positive findings with respect to Section
3.1.1(Performance Standards), Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings) and Section
4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k) of the Land Development Regulations, and the
policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to conditions.
C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class Ill site plan
modification, landscape plan and design elements for 85 SE 6th Avenue,
Handlesman Yellow Building, based upon a failure to make positive findings with
respect to the Land Development Regulations.
HPB Staff Report
Handlesman Yellow Building-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements
Page 10
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
By Separate Motions:
Waiver:
Approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.14(A)(2), to reduce the site visibility traingle at the
intersection of SE 6th Avenue and SE 1st Street, from 40' to 18', based upon positive
findings with LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5).
Site Plan Modification
Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class III site plan
modification for 85 SE 6th Avenue, Handlesman Yellow Building, based on positive
findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and LDR Section
2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings) and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the
following conditions:
1. Address all Site Plan Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the revised
plans.
2. That the refuse enclosure be relocated so that it does not reduce the existing site
visibility triangle at the intersection of the municipal parking lot driveway and the
alley.
3. That a photometric plan and decorative lighting detail be provided.
Landscape Plan
Approve the COA for the landscape plan for 85 SE 6th Avenue, Handlesman Yellow
Building, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to
the following conditions:
1. Address all Landscape Plan Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the
revised plans.
Design Elements
Approve the COA for the design elements for 85 SE 6th Avenue, the Handlesman
Yellow Building, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4),
(E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k).
Attachments:
• Location Map
• Site Plan
• Floor Plan
• Building Elevations
• Landscape Plan
Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner
DEIRAY BEACH DEEBAY BEACH
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
1111,, MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT
1993 1993
2001 2001
Agent: Bulldog Fence Company
Project Name: Cueto Residence
Project Location: 415 North Swinton Avenue
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The item before the Board is consideration of a COA request for the installation of a
green, vinyl coated, chain link fence on a contributing property, pursuant to LDR Section
2.4.6(J).
BACKGROUND
The property consists of Lot 1, Block 6, Del-Ida Park. The 1,660 sq. ft. Mission style,
single-family residence was constructed in 1925 and is considered a contributing
property within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The property is zoned R-1-AA (Single
Family Residential).
The Historic Preservation Board has taken no recent action regarding modifications to
this property. The applicant is now before the Board for the installation of a four foot (4')
green vinyl chain link perimeter fence.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The proposed project consists of the installation of a four (4) foot, green vinyl chain link
perimeter fence along the south, west, and north property lines and at the rear of
(perpendicular to) the extant dwelling. Based on the discernible location of the lot at the
corner of North Swinton Avenue and NE 5th Street, the applicant proposes to screen the
chain link fence with ficus hedge which will be planted four (4) feet in height at the time
of planting. The green vinyl coating on the chain link fence is also intended to
camouflage its appearance from the right-of-way while providing both a retention area
for the family's dog and privacy for the residents.
Meeting Date: March 19,2003
Agenda Item: II.B.
415 North Swinton Avenue
Page 2
DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS:
LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in
evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior
architectural features. The guidelines are as follows:
The Board Shall Consider:
Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture,
and color of the façade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant
materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district.
Delray Beach Design Guidelines
Unpainted wood fences and chain link fences are inappropriate for any historic
site. Green stained chain link with complimentary hedging height may be used in
rear yards not visible from the streetscape. All new fences should be compatible with
the style, texture, and fabric of the street. Spanish style masonry walls are preferred to
enclose Mediterranean buildings.
ANALYSIS:
The proposed four (4) foot green, vinyl coated, chain link fence is not appropriate for the
location along the front and side property lines or for the Mission style building. Based
on the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, it is recommended that the applicant install a
masonry wall or an aluminum fence with the look of wrought iron surrounding the
property at the proposed four (4) foot height in order to compliment the Mission style of
the building as well as the surrounding historic properties within the Del-Ida Park
Historic District. The installation of a vinyl coated, chain link fence cannot be supported
based on a failure to find positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g)
and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
A. Continue with direction.
B. Approve COA 2003-147 for the installation of a vinyl coated, chain link fence on the
contributing property at 415 North Swinton Avenue, based upon positive findings
with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines.
C. Deny COA 2003-147 for the installation of a vinyl coated, chain link fence on the
contributing property at 415 North Swinton Avenue, based upon a failure to make
positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach
Design Guidelines.
415 North Swinton Avenue
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION
Deny COA 2003-147 for the installation of a vinyl coated, chain link fence on the
contributing property at 415 North Swinton Avenue, based upon a failure to provide
positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach
Design Guidelines.
Report Prepared by:Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner
Attachments:Survey, Fence Detail