Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
HPB-06-04-03
SIGN IN SHEET 1111© 1993 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting of June 4, 2003 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ORGANIZATION ITEM !fir}-A i iAA:e`- eiaitn ..e ke-- Lo ii . ' A- .A%-0 )19-- CA ie * Opei(A -ti-d (--) z , L.__ __ , TA 4Ly S,a C� iIc Z i 1 At\ V l VTfi� - KP3 Aj11( a i i ,c(iri-if&G,#.3 c a.,(Lk7-- 0i i _- /gi n_co,:r___ \,.0 ,,,,o.„,,,,,_? r, _. e4. 7 (9-7 5 /V ° 5 G(11/Liro� 1 i A-m, (1., 0 LON O— C r E R'c - L- i Kb tAt u e_e_A-i cR-P\ /A)N ( c_ --- Th I 2 v*--A S-vg.g.s S R_ `fie(Au-t-1/ ; _ILL F J �� (� L, j i 7 L. C t 2 re,=.4, `�`6grG,4r , r,itG - F MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: JUNE 4, 2003 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:01 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gloria Elliott, Gail-Lee McDermott, Jim Keavney, Rhonda Sexton, Francisco Perez-Azua (arrived 6:05). MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Branning STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Lynne Tuzik II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes for the Public Hearings/Regular Meetings were before the Board for consideration. Ms. Sexton made a motion to approve the Minutes of October 16, 2002 as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS At this time the Chairperson read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures and swore in all witnesses wishing to speak. Ms. Jamison made a motion to change the order of the agenda, moving item III.A. to III.C. The motion was seconded and the Board was in favor of the change 6-0. A. Vintage Rose, 102 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Tamelyn Sickle, Owner. Item Before the Board: Consideration of a COA associated with a Class I Sit Plan Modification for the installation of two free-standing signs, an under canopy sign, and an awning on a contributing property, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. Ms. Shay entered the project file and a copy of her resume into the record and presented the item to the Board. Tamelyn Sickle, owner, and Mike Sneiderman, sign contractor, were present to represent the project. They explained in detail their request for two free-standing signs as well as an under canopy sign. The Board discussed the necessity of the two free-standing signs based on the location of that property along a one-way street. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the location of the proposed signs and the applicant's need for more than one free-standing sign. The Board directed the applicant to reduce the proposed sign at the corner of NE 1st Avenue and NE 1st Street by 2/3, to reduce the under canopy sign from 5 sq. ft. to 4 sq. ft., and to ensure that the proposed sign adjacent to the alley is outside of the sight visibility triangle. Waiver Request It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0 to recommend to the City Commission approval of the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) to permit more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs on one parcel for 102 NE 1st Avenue, The Vintage Rose, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Certificate of Appropriateness It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of two free- standing signs at 102 NE 1st Avenue, The Vintage Rose, based upon the positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b) and (d), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the east sign be reduced by 2/3 its original size. 2) That the free-standing sign at the southwest corner of the property (adjacent to the alley) be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. 3) That the under canopy sign be reduced from 5 sq. ft. to 4 sq. ft. on the east elevation. -2- HPB Minutes 6/4/03 B. Messingschlager Residence, 242 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Michelle Messingschlagger, Owner. Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of an addition and pool on a non-contributing property at 242 SE 7th Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. Ms. Shay entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. Michelle Messingschlager, owner, and Michael Garrison, architect, were present to represent the project. After some discussion, it was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of an addition and a pool at 242 SE 7th Avenue, based on positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1. (E)(7) and (E)(8)(a), (c), (g), (h), and (j) and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. Independence Title, 204 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Roger Cope, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Waiver Requests for the conversion of a single family home to offices. Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. Ms. Shay entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. Roger Cope, authorized agent, was present to represent the project. A detailed discussion ensued regarding the demolition of the garage and the proposed elevations. The Board determined that the garage could be demolished and that the applicant should return to the Board with details of the lighting, awnings, fountain, retaining wall, and color samples and re-design the elevations for a more cohesive style that will better blend with the historic Mission-Revival dwelling. -3- HPB Minutes 6/4/03 Waiver Request After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0 to approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1) to reduce the required stacking distance from 20' to 5', based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Mr. Keavney and passed 6-0 to approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) to reduce the landscape strip at the north property line in the parking area from 5' to 3' excluding the 6" curbing, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Demolition It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 6-0 to approve the demolition of the contributing garage. Site Plan It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 6-0 to approve the COA and associated Class V site plan for the conversion of a single family home to office at 204 Dixie Boulevard, Independence Title, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F) (5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That the photometric plan be revised to comply with LDR Section 4.6.8. 3) Eliminate the apron at the driveway to the north of the property fronting Dixie Boulevard. 4) The dumpster will remain in the designated area. Landscape Plan It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 6-0 to approve the COA for the landscape plan for 204 Dixie Boulevard, Independence Title, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16 subject to the following condition: -4- HPB Minutes 6/4/03 1) That revised plans are submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. Design Elements It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 6-0 to approve the COA and associated design elements for the conversion of a single family home to offices at 204 Dixie Boulevard, Independence Title, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8), subject to the following conditions: 1) That a color palette/scheme be submitted. 2) That the elevations are a simplified design which compliments the existing Mission-Revival style dwelling. 3) That a detail of the proposed fountain is submitted. 4) That a detail and color sample of the proposed awnings are submitted. 5) That a detail of the proposed windows be submitted including a muntin profile. 6) That a detail of the planters, retaining wall, and associated pilasters be submitted. D. Jagger's Universe, 275 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Claudio Camilucci, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free- standing sign of a contributing property, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. Ms. Shay entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. Cliff Jagger, owner, was present to represent the project. Mr. Jagger discussed in detail the color palette of the proposed sign with the Board. The Board chose a color palette which they felt was more in keeping with that found on the house and recommended white (frame), eggplant (text), gold and another color to be left up to the staffs discretion. It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. Sexton, and passed 6-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free- -5- HPB Minutes 6/4/03 standing sign for 275 N. Swinton Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7. (G)(1)(b), (G) (2) (b), (G) (7), and (H) (2) (a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed color scheme for the sign compliments those colors found on the associated building. E. Bull Bar, 2 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Garat Oates, Owner. Item Before the Board: Consideration a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of two wall signs on a contributing property, and an associated waiver, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. Ms. Shay entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. Garat Oates was present to represent the project. The Board considered the appropriate color scheme for the proposed signs. and recommended claret red for the body of the sign rather than the brighter red proposed by the applicant and that a light color highlight the copy on the west elevation sign. Waiver Request It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0 to recommend to the City Commission approval of the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G) (7) to permit more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs on one parcel for 2 E. Atlantic Avenue, The Bull Bar, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B) (5). Certificate of Appropriateness It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of two wall signs for The Bull Bar, 2 E. Atlantic Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(a), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a- c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: -6- HPB Minutes 6/4/03 1) That the proposed color scheme for the signs compliments those colors found on the associated building and logo and change the proposed red background to claret. 2) That the wall sign for the west elevation be reduced in width from 48" (4') to 40" (3' 4") and reduced in height from 28" (2'4") to 24" (2'). 3) That the copy on the sign proposed for the west elevation be outlined with a lighter color for better exposure. F. S&R Beauty Supplies, 103 NW 5th Avenue, West Settler's Historic District, Rutha Stubbs, Owner. Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a monument sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the project to the Board. Rutha Stubbs, owner, Jay Little, sign contractor, Diane Colonna and Rosalind Murray (CRA) were present to represent the project. - It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 6-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a monument sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the street address (number) be incorporated into the arch of the sign. IV. DISCUSSION ITEM Presentation by Rich McGloin on the proposed Public Arts Ordinance. Mr. McGloin gave a PowerPoint presentation explaining the formation of a Public Arts Task Force. Mr. McGloin asked the Board to consider all forms of art which could be used in creating public displays within the city. The plan is scheduled to begin October 1, 2003 and excludes single family homes and "affordable housing". Fees would be imposed on new developments rather than taxing established homes or businesses to generate revenue. -7- HPB Minutes 6/4/03 V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: None B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: None D. Staff: Ms. Shay notified the Board about upcoming reviews for the design guidelines drafts. The City Commission will hold a workshop to review the final draft on June 10, 2003. The guidelines are due to the state office no later than July 31, 2003. VI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 9:40 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for June 4, 2003, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on September 3, 2003. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -8- HPB Minutes 6/4/03 AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING 4.4), CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: June 4, 2003 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • October 16, 2002 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Independence Title, 204 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Roger Cope, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements, and Waiver Requests for the conversion of a single family home to offices. B. Vintage Rose, 102 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Tamelyn Sickle, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of two free-standing signs, an under canopy sign, an awning, and an associated waiver. C. Messingschlagger Residence, 242 SE 7th Avenue, Marina District, Michelle Messingschlagger, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of an addition and pool on a non-contributing property. D. Jagger's Universe, 275 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Claudio Camilucci, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free standing sign. June 4, 2003 HPB Meeting Page 2 E. Bull Bar, 2 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Garat Oates, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of two wall signs and an associated waiver. F. S&R Beauty Supply, 103 NW 5th Avenue, West Settler's Historic District, Bright Image Signs, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a monument sign. IV. DISCUSSION ITEM Presentation regarding the Public Arts Ordinance V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff VI. ADJOURN Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: May 29, 2003 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2002 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:03 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott, Rhonda Sexton, Bill Branning, Francisco Perez-Azua. MEMBERS ABSENT: Jim Keavney STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Loretta Heussi II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS At this time the Chairperson read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. Ms. Heussi swore in all those wishing to speak. A. Elizabeth's on 7th, 9 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Roger Cope, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is that of granting • an extension of the following aspects of a development proposal for Elizabeth's on 7th, pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 2.4.4(F)(3): • Class II Site Plan Modification; • Landscape Plan; • Design Elements; and, • Waiver to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), to reduce the required perimeter landscape buffer along the east side of the property from five feet (5')to zero feet (0'). Ms. Jamison inquired about ex-parte communications on this item. None were stated. 1 Ms. Shay entered the project file into the record and presented the project to the Board. Roger Cope presented the project on behalf of the applicant. Ms. McDermott inquired about a change in off-site parking spaces. Ms. Shay explained that the Board was previously concerned that there were too many off-site parking spaces proposed, however, the plans now show more spaced provided on-site. She inquired to Mr. Cope to confirm the total number of on-site parking spaces. Mr. Cope stated that the extension request is on the original permit and that the only change is that there are now 22 parking spaces on-site. Ms. McDermott asked the applicant when the new owner came in and when Mr. Cope came on Board. Mr. Cope stated the new owner came in about 45 days ago and he was retained a few weeks prior to the permitting issue. After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0 approve the request for an extension of the COA and associated waiver, Class II site plan modification, landscape plan, and design elements for Elizabeth's on 7th, based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) and LDR Sections 2.4.4(F)(1), 2.4.5(F)(5) (Compatibility), 2.4.7(B)(5), 4.6.16, and 4.6.18, with said approval to be valid for an additional 18 months (expiring April 18, 2004). B. Gross Residence, 201 NE 5th Court, Del-Ida Park Historic District, John Gross, Owner. Action Before the Board: Consider paint colors for a fence associated with a non-contributing historic property. Ms. Shay presented the project. She stated that the fence is currently painted red, white, and blue and presented photos of the fence. The applicant is requesting that the current colors be retained. If this is not possible, the applicant is willing to change the fence color to a solid red brick color. Mr. Perez asked the applicant to present some alternative colors to the red and requested color samples. Mr. Branning stated he would like to see accent colors which would compliment the building in a monochromatic scheme. -2- HPB Minutes 10/16/02 Ms. Jamison requested paint chips. Ms. Shay explained to the applicant that if he chose one of the previously approved colors as listed on the Approved Historic Preservation Board color chart that he would not have to return for Board approval, otherwise he will have to return at a later date for Board review and approval. The Board tabled the item until further direction by the applicant. C. Price House, 1109 Seaspray Avenue, Individually Listed Property, Tamelyn Sickle, Owner. Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is re- consideration of existing windows, associated with a previously approved Certificate of Appropriateness for the Price House, 1109 Seaspray Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Heussi swore in the applicant and her agent. Ms. Shay entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. The house displays existing picture windows on the front elevation which are thought to be "historic" in their own right by the applicant, however, they are inappropriate to the frame style of the building and do not compliment the existing 6/1 windows on the second floor. Photographs of current windows were shown to the Board and Ms. Shay recommended that the windows be replaced with compatible windows that would be appropriate for the building. Gary Eliopoulos (agent) and Tamelyn Sickle (owner) were present to the represent the project. Mr. Eliopoulos described the previous review by the Board in that the picture windows were previously discussed and the Board requested more information on the history. The home was originally located on the ocean then moved to its current location. The windows are at least 50 years old but they are not the original windows of the home. Mr. Eliopoulos then handed out material on the windows. Mr. Branning asked if the windows were changed on the second floor. Mr. Eliopoulos stated that they were not changed, however, they could have been changed when the home was on the ocean. Mr. Branning inquired if the window frames had been widened. -3- HPB Minutes 10/16/02 Ms. Sickle stated that the front façade of the house was not related to the construction/improvements for this project. She also stated that she was uncertain if the windows are original, however, they have been on the house for very many years and replacement would require improvements to the siding, landscaping, and windows if the Board mandated replacement. Mr. Perez supported the applicant's rehabilitation efforts and that he . does not support replacement of the windows as necessary. Ms. McDermott stated that it would be a hardship to mandate replacement of the windows. Ms. Sickle stated that replacement would be an economic hardship. Mr. Branning suggested installation of faux muntins for the windows to replicate the light configuration of the windows on the second floor. Ms. Shay requested that if false muntins were attached that the profiles match those on the house. Ms. McDermott expressed her concern over the maintenance. After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 4-2 to deny the request to eliminate the condition of approval to replace the modern windows with those that are more appropriate for the period of construction on a contributing building at 1109 Sea Spray Avenue, based on a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation with the basis stated: 1) That the applicant may apply false muntins in a pattern .deemed appropriate by the project architect and that the design is approved by staff. Ill. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. . Public Comments: Ms. Carolyn Patton, representing Progressive Residents of Delray (PROD) expressed her concern regarding demolitions in the Marina Historic District. Ms. Patton submitted the demolition portion of the City's Preservation Ordinance for review. -4- HPB Minutes 10/16/02 Ms. Shay stated that she explains the process in detail to potential property owners/developers regarding demolition in the district, however, it is the Board's decision as to whether a property can be demolished. Ms. Joann Peart, 107 NW 9th Street, agreed with Ms. Patton. If we support demolitions in historic districts, the City is digressing rather than progressing with preservation efforts. Ms. Alieda Riley, 65 Palm Square, supported the statements of Ms. Peart. Ms. Shay explained the process to the Board and the public regarding requests for demolition with potential owners/developers. She further stated that the department is looking to revise the ordinance. A lengthy discussion followed regarding demolition issues. B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: None D. Staff: Ms. Shay stated that no approval was obtained for the new gold paint color. New windows were installed on the east elevation and were approved with the tinted windows with metal (bronze)frames. Ms. Shay also stated that the Colony Hotel would also like to install white sign panel with different colored text for each establishment. The Board directed the signs to be the same color text to match that which is currently on the property. Ms. Shay stated that the Fisher Properties (27-43 South Swinton Avenue) project has been indefinitely suspended per the authorized agent, Michelle Balfoort, as the conditions of approval have not been met. Ms. Shay passed along a copy of Phase II of the historic property survey for review by each Board member. -5- HPB Minutes 10/16/02 Ms. Jamison requested information about whether the Board can postpone projects due to scheduling conflicts. The accessory structure issue at 610 N. Ocean Boulevard will be heard at a City Commission meeting on election night, however, only the applicant can request a postponement. IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:00 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for October 16, 2002, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on June 4, 2003. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -6- HPB Minutes 10/16/02 • • • • OEIRAY BEACH DEIRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD d �II MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT City 1993 1993 2001 - 2001 Agent: Tamelyn Sickle Project Name: Vintage Rose Project Location: 102 NE 1st Avenue ITEM BE-FORE- THE BOARD ._ The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I Site Plan Modification for the installation of two free-standing signs, an under canopy sign, and an awning on a contributing property, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property contains a frame vernacular, single family home located on the south 11.5' of Lot 15 and all of Lot 16, Block 67, Town of Delray in the Old School Square Historic Arts (OSSHAD) zoning district. The property is located at the northwest corner of NE 1st Street and NE 1st Avenue. The two-story, contributing historic building was constructed in 1939 and retains its historic integrity. During its meeting of August 7, 2002,_ the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved a COA and associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements for the conversion of the contributing building from residential to retail including the construction of a ten space parking lot, paver block walkways, and associated landscaping. Construction is currently underway. On February 19, 2003, the Board reviewed and approved Part I of the tax abatement application for the improvements affiliated with the project referenced above. The applicant is now before the Board to review the installation of two free-standing signs, an under canopy sign, a canvas awning, and an associated waiver. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project proposal is the installation of two free-standing signs and an under canopy sign for a retail establishment. The proposed single-sided, free-standing signs will have a curvilinear design and will be constructed of '/2" pvc with decorative (treated) wood posts and will be located approximately 8.5' east of the alley at the southwest corner of the property (oriented diagonally) and 10' from the east property line (facing NE 1st Meeting Date:June 4,2003 Agenda Item: III.B. • Vintage Rose 2003-194 ' 102 NE 1st Avenue Page 2 Avenue) at the southeast corner of the property. The single-sided, under canopy sign will also be constructed of pvc and will be located under the fascia on the first floor porch of the south elevation. Each sign will display an Antique White face and posts to match the trim on the building and will be adorned with painted red roses and green vines. The proposed font will be dark green and outlined in black. The text will include the property's address and "The Vintage Rose" with "A Unique Gift Shoppe" below on each free-standing sign. The same color scheme and the title 'The Vintage Rose" is proposed on the under canopy sign. The free standing signs measure 48" (4') square excluding the 4" sign posts and 70" (5'10") in height (including the decorative support posts) and measures 16 sq. ft. in area. The under canopy sign measures approximately 72" (6')wide, 10" tall and is 5 sq. ft. in area. No lighting is proposed at this time. The proposed project also consists of the installation of a forest green canvas, shed style awning with scalloped edges on the front (east) façade above the second floor porch. The awning measures 26' in width and 1'6" in height and will project 9' from the building. The awning will be supported by metal poles which will be partially concealed behind the railing pickets on the second floor balcony. The awning will be anchored to the building and is non-retractable. ANALYSIS Design Elements Analysis Awning LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8)(g) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. Awning Analysis The proposed shed awning is typical of those found throughout the district and is appropriate in design, dimensions, and location. The treatment is reversible and will not cause irreparable damage to the dwelling. The shed style with scalloped edges and proposed dark green color compliments the frame style building and its present color • Vintage Rose 2003-194 102 NE 1st Avenue Page 3 scheme. Positive findings can therefore be made with respect to Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(g). SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(1)(b) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Free-standing Signs:" A free-standing sign is not affixed to any other structure. It may be either a pole sign or a monument sign. Neither the pole nor the base of the monument shall be considered in calculation of the area of the sign face. A free-standing sign may not have more than two faces. LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(1)(d) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Under Canopy Signs:" A sign hung from a canopy or roof of a walkway. It may be rigid or may swing. Such a sign many not have more than two sign faces. LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and states: The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7). LDR Section 4.6.7 (H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. a) Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (E) with respect to height and area. b) Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. c) Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. • Vintage Rose 2003-194 • . 102 NE 1st Avenue Page 4 Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building façade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the architecture. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts, however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining"and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. One such standard states: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Waiver Analysis Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7), not more than one of any type of sign nor more than two signs are permitted per lot, parcel, or development. The applicant has requested a waiver to this requirement to permit the installation of two free-standing signs on the property and a total of three signs on the property. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: a.) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b.) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c.) Shall not create an unsafe situation;and, d.) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. • Vintage Rose 2003-194 102 NE 1st Avenue Page 5 The Vintage Rose property, measuring 88'x126', does not warrant a third sign as the majority of vehicular traffic will be concentrated on NE 1st Street, which is directed one- way westbound although conversion of NE 1st Street from one-way to two-way traffic is contemplated for the future. If the free-standing sign proposed by the alley is relocated to the southern property line adjacent to the parking area (approximately.25' to the east and oriented perpendicular to the street) and the under canopy sign is relocated to face NE 1st Avenue on the east elevation, there will be adequate identification and signage for pedestrian and vehicular traffic along both streets. Further, pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(h), no sign shall be located in such a manner that it will become a hazard to automotive or pedestrian traffic nor shall any sign or lighting be placed as to obstruct the vision of the driver or any motor vehicle where vision is necessary for safety. The proposed sign location at the southwest corner of the site at the intersection of the alley and NE 1st Street will create a sight visibility obstruction and therefore has not been supported by the City Engineer. Given the above analysis, the waiver request for an additional free-standing sign will grant a special privilege as no other retail business in the area displays more than two signs per property and the adjoining properties conform to the same restrictions of traffic flow. While the establishment lies on a corner lot, there is no justification that more than two signs per property are necessary to convey the establishment's location and identity from NE 1st Avenue or NE 1st Street. While no public facilities will be diminished, the proposed location of the free-standing sign at the corner of NE 1st Street and the alley may create an unsafe situation as it diminishes the sight visibility at that corner. Based on this analysis, positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B) cannot be made and a recommendation for denial of the waiver request can be supported. Conclusion The proposed signage is appropriate in relation to the style, dimensions, and design in the surrounding neighborhood. Per LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(d), if the building is located within the Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), a sign may be placed within the standard setback with the stipulation that it does not exceed 7' in height or 30 sq. ft. in area. As proposed, the free-standing signs meet this requirement, however, pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7), an under canopy sign cannot exceed 4 sq. ft in area. As the under canopy sign does not meet this area requirement, a condition of approval has been attached to reduce the under canopy sign area from 5 sq. ft. to 4 sq. ft. Further, denial of the waiver request would permit the installation of a one free-standing sign on the property. An additional condition of approval has been attached to relocate the proposed free-standing sign from the southwest corner of the property to approximately 25' east of the proposed sign location and perpendicular to the street. Based on these conditions, positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.6.7(G)(3)(d), 4.6.7(G)(7), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards can be made. • Vintage Rose 2003-194 • 102 NE 15t Avenue Page 6 REVIEW BY OTHERS During its meeting of April 25, 2003, the Delray Beach Sign Review Committee reviewed and approved the signs as proposed with the condition that the under canopy sign be reduced to 4 sq. ft. in area pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7).The Committee reviewed a second free-standing sign during their meeting of May 27, 2003. The Committee did not support a second free-standing sign. They felt that the property will be able to achieve appropriate signage with the addition of directional signs into the parking lot available to them by code. The Pineapple Grove Design Review Committee reviewed and approved the awning as proposed during its meeting of May 8, 2003. No review of the signs was conducted by this group. ALTERNATIVE, ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA associated with the Class I site plan modification for the installation of a free-standing and an under canopy sign and a canvas awning and the deny the associated waiver request for 102 NE 1st Avenue, Vintage Rose, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b) and (d), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and a failure to make positive finding with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B), subject to conditions. C. Approve the COA and waiver associated with the Class I site plan modification for the installation of a free-standing sign, an under canopy sign, and a canvas awning for 102 NE 1st Avenue, Vintage Rose, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 2.4.7(B)(5), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), 4.6.7(G)(1)(b) and (d), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. D. Deny the COA and waiver associated with the Class I site plan modification for the installation of a installation of two free-standing signs, an under canopy sign and a canvas awning for 102 NE 1st Avenue, Vintage Rose, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 2.4.7(B)(5), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b) and (d), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. • Vintage Rose 2003-194 102 NE 15t Avenue Page 7 RECOMMENDATION Waiver Request Recommend to the City Commission denial of the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) to permit more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs on one parcel for 102 NE 1st Avenue, The Vintage Rose, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Certificate of Appropriateness Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of one free standing located on the south side of the property, and an under canopy sign and a canvas awning on the east elevation at 102 NE 1st Avenue, Vintage Rose, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(g), 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b) and (d), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the area for the under canopy sign be reduced from 5 sq. ft. to 4 sq. ft. 2) That the second free-standing sign be eliminated and that the first free-standing sign be relocated from the southwest corner of the lot approximately 25' to the east of the proposed sign location, perpendicular to the street. Attachments:Survey, Sign and Awning specs Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner a EXISTM CNY?E7 TO RETIAN MEM EY 7: mom ,-..... 4 l".I i EXIST TO I�HARL O REPAIR AS REQUIRED. ]vIII�AS AND AS • hFPANT N 9AtTE COLOR �/��:. COPYRIGHT RIGHTS SCFE7tiE _ ,.......:._.... ., . CII iNOW=l RYECN,WEI •REIPI S 0 I I•_, �- me G7 • YAY BE`WO6 NI1N0 _�._ _ P RtI$ICN. .TH[G �.EPIFY AHO Bf PI — _ ALL OIUENSIONSR. �) / — WRITTEN ODWENSI _ OVER SCALED DOA AND ASSOOATES P.A ' I- .. _ - I I I OF ANY DISCREPAI ASSUMES NO UA �_ — `� UNAUniOPo:m USE I. I I OPANINOS AND i - I>1_, - `_ ice- ��---' �_..�� $ t /d 1 , aT T. ILLL r 1 ` Q � d _ T �-u . _—.._-T.- ---- - LLE ARE RESTGRNG THIS FACADE TO TFB cfezm .CONoma+. SOUTH EL.EVILIT I Ole! 9 +- z ca . } �_o w • E; I t GOL.OR SG Hrr : H. 4S14'11,000 POST w �,� PF 81 \y AU.COLOR U5ED ARE FROM CITY OF DELRAY 6EACN �� x?(( TO REJECT 41 f +E►E 5 Z,GE5TED NP6 EXTERIOR BUILDS COLORS I 1 ).-L COLORS LISTED ARE PORTER PAINTS OR EQUIVALENT. • I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I _I I I I -I I J -1 I I I I I 1 II 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I ( I I I l ( I 1 I I 1 1 • 1 III I I I I 1 11 I I 1 1 1 _1 1 1 1 I I 1 Al I I I 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1111111 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I III I I 11 I II 1 J 1 -I 1 I 11 I I I II I 1 I I II 11 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 11 I I 1 I I I I. 11 I 1 I 1.I L. I.I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I . ./--REMAH T 9FIIYaLEa TO 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I II Iy1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 S I .1 11 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 11 .1 1 I 1 II I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1r I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I -1 I -R 1 1 1 1. 1 1 I 1 I I 11 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I_1 1_1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I �mtiN.✓ 1\wN a c- 1 1 1 1 I I ! JIII 1 I ( 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I III I 1 1 1 1 1 1 f I I I J 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1..1 1 1 1. 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 III 1 I I I I J r I 1 I I 1 l I I 1 I 1 ( 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I EXISTR6 REMAIN.R Ivaco£PAIRI TO ` AS NEEDED NEW GUARDRAIL l r�=I �..f1, { .1 _ _II II t =mime / AT.41'ARP, t�"7- TOI5TCY,WOOD 841! TO REMAW.REPAIR '... AS NEEDED Q Q\ - : =_____ ., ENE .. ...----= . r� I -- [ � —r I L�11[® f. I 'i C.- EOIaTN.'s UirCi W3 T _LI Min G..�.7_ 7' to( L•^�`1J.— L— '_1 , ..11 EX91. R 7- MOST. FxPAIR/tiu ttW" ( REPAIR EXIST).*61, -THIS AREA MATCH r-1 ( I— . I 1 1 I I 1 _ l 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I ..— • —774 ‘ I--- — ---- � 1.= ® ® _I 1 r 1 I .J���� 1 I II f ® ® III l ) El ,EjE I c_ T 1:1 _, I m�s. r;.1 1_ ® U .I �.I MI,�. . ..; —I 'I..1'' v. I I_I, .i mai r ,' . —"It liil EXIST).*DOORS TO REMAN - lE GCNaTfaIGTICN-- INDICATES EXISTAY3 DOOR TO REMAIN EXISTING S NEEIERSDED TOF1BtAN REPAIR as NEEDED DAbTNS Waco LATTICE !4ST El.agVF 11T(Oil DWLDNG SORT TO REMAR1 SCALE: 1/4' = I'-0' I 1 I A I-AdKIL Hvv /Vi /VL GENERAL NOTES: • ,ALL PIPE TOO ASA SO(EDCLL AO CAL./AN;ZED LNLTSS MOTTO OTh:T1 I:E. ,ALL MELDS TO CC1P. 11.A A.e S.CODE.CURRENT EDIT ION. / .Au.YD.OS SAW.Et 3/16"TILL F ILLET A'ELOS U.M.O.• .ALL*FLOS Tan=RED!ITN ALUM I MM PA INT. t./:A'A,1 C`-' .AU.STRLGTIM[S NAVE BED OCT IQ1E0 IN ACCOROO CE N IT+T:T -2001 no IOA BUILD INO CODE• �. �� • -ST�,VG WILD IND DICE..1 91ED IT ION 'IT ICN ALL LOCAL MIDDDRS-TO11EAEWE B.CLuOIOO 1•310011 PEC Ol) e/QCOIIWCE SEC 1201.7(47(0, 1y\ AA AS $ETAT[D®ES'NORU AROS. 9'tLt�-JJI fA9TID CAAMA$:SIMei�EIEEiDOY AYYFIETALL IC.NON-CORRCS rvE ■ATEYRESIS[AMG:.•AGilllBfAi11C�FLECT 10N WTOF'SCOPE CI_�i. • \ YAMS,ELLASIEP •RCP,:. UflT lEII�PM16MoIEI KSRet6 AI.0NNY. -. FRAIT7NTgNRA'FA1141MYE�FUaC310 ASEft RATCE 1014�(EXPOSURE Ue'LW IB.t 'raHT16Ty.AN u1N�11l I6PCASC ',sLASCE 7-96(DPORNE 9^b'C.'Y;ONI:1Li EEIE MrIrE ARL T93. THE Art= ONEA•SNVL:BE10TIFIED di THESE COD I.IONS 3Y TIE A sULDLOI SF 36•WART ISCCTANCOH EINAWAYTT.E70NESSED OR IW-IG. IYCD ENDUED, SAL.AFFIXED 7. AEC DD[4riM1.;EC3RD A..SIgeNON.YY USE CR DRSS 9Q�FIICAvAL TIION EM NTRACTTES STRUCTuRAi TR. . INC..et.V I.1 HOEDNIFIESAIO SAVES IMRLLESSTH IS ENO I LEER FOR ALL 5AA\e,.A y RESULT IND FROM WATERr l FAB/IIC0T 0N.STSTOI MKT!ON.A FEES P-rt o,cJ".- C016TROT ION PRACTICES®D4 TINT 10IQ1 IS CALLED no Err LOCAL.STATE.I FOWL,CONS 6 ROM 0EV IAT IONS OFF TN IS•RAH. •O' 1.EXCEPT AS E?PTESS:Y PRp IOD D IN TA I S SPEC If ICAT ION.N0 ADD IT 10NAL COAT IF ICAT iota OR AfF116NT106 ART INTCI[ED. \` '♦ • I 0 el-.....". -....."--"i 1-G" '' ':;:\******-\--.... ''... : 111119 Ir °el: , ".k.• .., FOR: V 1TJ-IACA.3 Cosa Cs, ;y A..r Cb e.Ya c..,A, SCALE: APPROVED BY DRAWN BY DATE: .,- DELRAY AWNING, Ii 1C. . 744 ts4H&E . 80 North Congress Avenue•Delray Beach,Fiori a 3344 DWAWING NUMBER • Phane(561)276.5381 Under Canapy, Single Sided Single Sided, Free Standing Identification Sign Identification Sign Vintillt,, . g Rogg ii4j,„., io" 102 NE 2nd venue; Delray Beach, FL 33444 V v yhg 72" ► 48" VlrIt A I g 70" RC)SZ ` ,•, -3. ^ w. k 7i..^r'-4 ,i,- tee*. yi.-„ .:;f ,' i2 J � - .. " :' i L .;`i _ l i I Y ° r .�a` 'a � `� Unique Gift Chopp¢ - � �'*� �. -,•.__.:v ) ._ _r .`"°t:.` : 't>s£ �- a '�` - - �x--,- -. _ - _.a t`i-• ` .`� ,4ta . -; _ ..,,_ _ _ •` 48" '- 'aL�al - ,�, --t.. __ - - _ 1�'�f _. � ,,,k:. .."`�",`�". �'= �. 1-'- 4c `J stARR .M6'..,,. ,� a,_ , �_4. y%p ) _ S'.1- _ - -k-y i.,.- �..4%.�ry{._ SIGN_c AMA • ' � .. - °., � -.., ,,�, r on 3 t 'a £ _, .- } r; -u to _ 4 '�: .S. f rAeir mot. 1• 102 u 4 • � ;r �. • t,1fr = r '" 22 /IVA. /I.� 1\ Y t\t\ l�! �1/.oter fi f- F .0 � 1%` 1 }1 r I'1• _:z* �--1 r'c,p z:', ,R.;:. 102 • } r :tom} , ♦ 'W- ,t ) ! f 1.. E r s fll��f ` -- --a �C "�. ! _ lV _ V. Jf _ _ uci • �. :. ip s v `L, �q • S t `ri .:ap ! {� t F `' •f a - • .��. ,!- • i _ „e,wnua oas. cam v Vie L , ` I t r +I" ;•,� : .a „J, _ -- -$ - ^{ SHS7874d6 OFFICE 3125 Souf4 Federal Hwy A 1 - - y, -' _1 ®�.`.�1 ` �116 �J ! �, s61s7s-sa31 FAX uelrq Berrh•FL 33183 • 1,7 PI ,i0L •� �.r.• ! RVV�I t -�\ '! �..,►�-.,r•.-, i ;1 Yt t 0�g ` i tS :�„, f -•y ` �� N Ziniqu�Clift�ShoppQ - ,` ti " i • E 3 `}i `.' �Iniqu�Gift Shopps✓ .,_ ..° i.,k,‘ .as .'• - _ f t --$ • _ I 1 `•;it . T.a�`v„I f Ns,„4,7-- .F •i v4. r,' +�:v ,, - - _ t d1 - : � f- -,: , y. x�e; -i,:� • va: tp �dr .,-,'' - 'moo• .•, • :.T 'qs f" F •-t �. el•f• -`7'" "- ' ,. ,.;:.,a53.., � - 5z+ae S /..0 «._r f-a; ,y x�.ai. _ • r 1 .;_ .' Ufa PjT ' E-. -F i f•,• ` ' - £�A� ect," v l t•.•,. .4J ii4 / 7,44- •� ,�• 1' -/may-(- -,1G • • T 9Y • • +. . - #,..^ate �. ' Y as [Y^. r • k _ r _ L . •ice, r X-e. I _ , - :J'- i. 4•�.43'.yf tl /:r t' "Bf f5�.-oc`` 1 a': - �i m °.. g .I „ i ..._a.# ......�:t�u� t I `� - -: :. l t-' �_ J 4 i. jl. ��3 - a � t -.:.: L.�.,.�,i -. f :.� )•: - ✓. � - - "°off--.� .....,.� } t..♦.. 1E:F. s L -JI ._ .. .:.; _ a.s. _ _ S _:...7,.y � ♦ ..- T. T.a�x,. .:xs.Y..;, `�.3 .'�� '*r ��- v - ..' "w-. Ir. _ .e-t_, t _- �. ���xr�'�"R .�-_ .r- y, ._ . teat - - _ PROPOSED SOUTHWEST ELEVATION PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION ,`1 } ; m` _� 4 `� T --:::: ;-----Vz r*,--1 tit :7:7:-. LOCATION NTS COLOR SCHEDULE LimminaiSQ. ALCULNS ... PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION Material: V2" Thick PVC Please See 41241o3 Client & Landlord Approval & Permission Background: Z n ® Mn7G to rontage: 1et ""b These drawings meet the appropriate criteria and are acceptable g x4' = 16 Sq. Site Plan PASS and ap03 proved for the purpose of permit apppcatlon match Building Submitted with this Trle approved contractor Is AAA signs of rlouywood Foreground: Dark Green, Blossom py: 6'X 10 SF application. � Tamel n Sickle Black pp „R,s For the Landlord: Y . Rose It�IV�l1A2 CORPORATE ENTITY `' I i I —(— PROJECT NOTES: ' l 1.0 _ z0- 1. THERE IS NO ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT ON THIS PROJECT. ' , V ( PA,IKMMrI yl5/efLi,T EY - -:r_f �i ,�Q® I "cn EACH- .AU"`� JG 'T+11A1•IG l-E - -• `j 'rn°I d�.& NON-'MM MO OWES e/ -- - - I / I '��. ^� 88�¢'r a� r3ip (—.. ----- :.-\\1 '�,ii' COPYR7Wl1' tom er * f C — — Y 1�AND A190pATES.PA \3� , �RIGHTS RESERVED rt--�flf - -WCI*ATMOE - {"---- _'.1` i MO „wu.a reM M MTV EOM t- .9 �,I A�AO ^ O \/" :. -,-1.._ rxoio aorana mlalurrl 1� IEIu ro!LIMONCNT S zsoaAmor RARER SCE • (; SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR INFORMATION ,,,,K„1,1 C 1„PIN M ME..dn POW MET. •t . �� 1"eo6e.� O ,•(', ,,``. , +t e`pH TYPICAL PARKING STALLS NOT TOSCA E ME `LOWY MO DE sru acMI"` ' '0 6 PRoI°CeEv wr71@e 'I 1 APtet• MDEPICTED ON m•AVAI ALL aM TIONSs O.a.. WI THESE OI ,j O . TRi bEEL _ L!D 6YL.b NO 4SM0.41f IE W51 Z MOMED Be.1,E SLOPE aIF I IS LESS TON THE 5V . , }__ �' .M��IA< I, 1�,...�.,.1. �.� SITE DATA: TOTAL Of MIT M . _ EXCFLARED slwi HER • • 1 / ~ �/ - it tMYalD�NEA i SITE AREA 11,088 S.F. AND SPE rx nCNS. EXCEED 1:12 - uwrMluaffM ASSLIMES IH K 11E4 MAIN; !(n1) ra�sC"w>,.i• i@�!` *TN_ �RIC Q 8 •wp ,. raelraa+Aml 1 BLDG. run: mEs METURNC6 acre iO ��' ` PARVfi T.�• wakrOwlni 6ff l+nroEnec ' FOOTPRINT 1,774 S.F. (16°/.) I / p 3O ...DE OKAY. MIMIC,CO RMATe VTR _ I. I GROSS 2,915 S.F. i -- \ ° '� M. - PAVING/DRIVES/SIDEWALK 4,581.4 S.F. (41.3%) Mai p B I -?• Q C011PARP R'� • I LANDSCAPE 4,732.E S.F. (42.7%) O /�_ a 1.. CURB RAMP DETAILS N.T.S. ; ' . c ....14IE DETAIL DI ` O ; PARKING REQUIRED ZONING DISTRICT: _n/ LL I FF++((14 _ TarA.rnr mrACT 1 SPACES/300 S.F.RETAIL FLOOR AREA OSSHAD lY.. LEVEL ` 1 _ IMPOSED, 1, - I 2.625.03 S.F./300 =9 REQUIRED SPACES 4 9z LANDING HORIZONTAL PROJECTION OR RUN e•-o' y.-o,4\ I ,.'' ' 1 4 C' _ Uf F U 1: 1 . LEVEL L G j 0 I r 'm (E..'f,fr',F`-' I , 1 A 4 w i / • oal.e.oewAc > ' LOT 16 )~ z. RArr TN6 Am*HN(11-1151ED HANDICAP PARKING REQUIRED=1 SPACE 3 R0.•'R aEVATKN A!NIERIOR-CCNTIUG! Ell! I � BLOCK 671 TO COOR>NATE DUCT WK.COMAIRATYIN I: I 4 HANDICAP PARKING PROVIDED=1 SPACE I—7,A MAXIMUM RISE MAX. HORIZ. D r ._ •(INCHES) PROJECTION (FEET) ��D 1 4s1`P I o NG'AI5LE '" I ; i TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED=9 SPACES >Z N J SLOPE WI N c : PR?0E ucT4EK DoNerA a TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED=IO SPACES 0 W • 1:12 TO <1:16 30 30 f .1 D`/ I • .N _ `^` uT"°ET"T>xs°IEJT. .- li • I 1:16 TO <1:20 30 40 �I /� -�IV�!T .- Q,1 �— .R..wa , J +,` ��� _ r.• IFIG. 16 O `/ l (1 ; nu°usA 1��.. r ' , I LEGAL DESCRIPTION r/1 C COMPONENTS OF A SINGLE RAMP -IQ !� I :_ ��I I i ,,`"� .�* N�_-_ � I o THE R oFT°TISAnonuOF VI r/I 3 AND SAMPLE RAMP DIMENSIONS • __�, -alum .U.. 1 _ , r ss 1 G� EASTS FEET°F SAID L°TB,ALL WBLOp(BT v� xw / I I' !!!�yy.� 1 m p. �I y I BE M'Y°FBEAGI.ACCORPTI1G TTO NOW KNOW.ATHE PLAT S DIE TM°F z I M ] • • t I,f -;1 , , U 1\ ,/ - RECORDED L NN PLAY BOOK I PAGE.3 OF THE PUBLIC .IA .// I.� �I n I I I a�% RECORDS OF PAW REACH COUNTY.RORIGA \ a 3 • 3'/jTT/r�► i 3' S. i IY V e+x RAM ' . ir I ' (� :: „ ' Q r� I //7 �i% � ... I T,.e• ¢ i N.SV INTON p I IF A RAMP RUN HAS A RISE GREATER THAN 6 in. 1 / ( II �' jam. ,,' . EETeAOC -• ...1r•. fa .. z Oi F OR A HORIZONTAL PROJECTION GREATER THAN 72 in., / N �� �U �; IT SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS ON BOTH SIDES. I -- Yip sAIBHe.-mew ii I 1 ll ', O er �f ( w ' GRIPPING SURFACES SHALL BE CONTINUOUS. �¢1 - . ''1 �, ,.,� �J� Av40# I MI 1.0 i x, I-25•-1.5• _ i , re" I i1 ,---- i� gI w; S 44 ry 1 I 2317.E I0O67i6 CO CFEIE , / '1 I // E 'P'c "roo "re, ' ' '..i • - ZUiv 1 �21.P p"tm-'H64„4 ctleg °> dip1p-_" W: .BOUND us, Q a I --TONL.AIVAL(EALS MTw111) N ! I _ I Noe F.tv 1.Now.r1._ = 1 /�/��/I � i N.BOUND US1 LW 8Q O -I vets eH,swo fiNw •`, 4 -� /' _ ..4 �� `��.•�. P. ( :3,- •M RCORATTJEI\IlsM°ATORWIeWHb.-. �� N �• i _r IN_ 1 T.OI EX 6TN6 6EidACK]d-r• I-1 l H➢ IN `I'- �- /--�-- _-• 6T.UCW]�TE Ew.6 1 v 18- MIN. 18" MIN._ I °�'�' cv N r i I �� \ INTRACOASTAL — •. ,AAOam2a . iI \ ® > 12802 / ` £ ExT111C TREE TO RDIAN I , x M7& HAY 2004 EDGE PROTECTION I I �` //T • .T DRAWN, JL 2•1001uU4 SECTION B �f1 . IDIOM.DRITEDT 10 MIMI / " I I MA / ;- / SGSG\ t I EASING SURFACE.TTO 1 QED 9Y' - criirr7" ' - DAMMED _. I I OCEAN \ MOO> REVISIONS' 1 $OYm�f1ftM6Ed t¢Mt DRAMS V. AUCAX/1.2iLTININ 1 RENEED 15 PER STATE GF ���:. /CR f�L7W1 \ \..... KR IfUryATKM- NS A BLDG.DEPT.AHD PEAEN GR19R6DECORAT^'E 1' MIN• ® 1 �\ I JAN�o]omt RAC f1 '- . \ _ LOCATION MAP NORTH 0 ® IEN®PI(gY,KRIM ftOBWE END OF RAMP I I T `r,.. - ��-. • tl E�15-7>ezlecc iAWtlr MNP ffoogg1' MIN. r ! TROT;ESTAMMO • rugifzu.+ �Aa ...T.....ov, 88.0 A --- 8'-�' f_'■ �I ) K.,e'6YAD LME �--- \ 6 hL66w16G IV jW+MS east T Slid•8 �4 came �.e w.Tle..r Fao+ ....++ 6 ,� T�} ��/� � ° p 5P-1 l �r V -alnl IH ,emu-.�ivinn,H0 I2"�)f2E3'F /" J I (� wolce9Us Inc; newos 1TLeIT o,0 1 Tit ta- A/� �/ S'I P!PE COL. s4ND M T •1GD-rO9Rol.>7D 6„H.�1C(L. 'U/ h_ci 5 BE-S cppNc. �Ftari wvnP � a+ e. / /�J (//'�')� S V �Q I/i 17r27� y GONCREIE APRON 1 "'1 �`� M1 6'ti - ;O u ALIl1 ML'4E PIP?!'IP1G - ,2 SITE P ALUM L1AN E'ATESTO EN • I �11�s�i O IROA6�P)A — 1 — N.E. 15T AvENUE__...— ----------- -- SCALE,v_e_Y_m_- -----------, i �q V NORTH Ina I N e O f RAMPS AS PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROU FRONT ELEVATION ROUTE •FRONT s € RAMP GRADING/RAILING DETAIL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE - 0t A .T 1E _ 11 3Iui11ets-.5 4 DE14.".BEACH 1:141 1:BEACII III'', HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD EPS! (1 MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT �I I I F., 1993 1993 2 20001 1 Agent: Michelle Messingschlager, Owner Project Name: Messingschlager Residence Addition & Pool Project Location: 242 SE 7th Avenue ITEM `'-BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of an addition and a pool on a non-contributing property at 242 SE 7th Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 14, Block 119, Gracey-Byrd Subdivision, within the Marina Historic District. Located on the west side of NE 7th Avenue, the property is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential) and includes a one-story, non-contributing 1,366 sq. ft. single family home. Constructed in 1974 in a masonry vernacular style, the concrete block home displays minimal architectural details that include a partial brick exterior, vertical siding detailing in the gable, and Bahama shutters on the front (east) and side elevations, and a front facing gable roof with shingles. No recent action has been taken by the Board pertaining to this property. The applicant is now before the Board for consideration of a 769 sq. ft. addition to a non-contributing dwelling and the construction of a pool. DESCRIPTION The proposed project includes the construction of a 769 sq. ft. L-shaped addition to the rear of an existing 1,366 sq. ft., non-contributing dwelling. The concrete block addition will feature a stucco exterior to match that found on the existing residence and a series of shingled hip and gable roofs which form an "L" to the west of the extant home. Fenestration for the addition consists of aluminum frame, single hung sash windows on the north and east elevations and paired French and solid panel doors which provide access to and from the addition and its storage to the patio area to the north. The area of the addition measures 30' wide by 42'11" which incorporates the L shape of the floor plan and the pool centered between the footprint of the house and the addition. Meeting Date:June 4,2003 Agenda Item: III.C. 242 SE 7th Avenue addition 2003-229-COA Marina Historic District 7 Page 2 The project also includes the construction of an 18'10"x10"-0" rectangular shaped pool and patio/deck area which will be located within the "L" of the addition on the north side of the property. The. color of the addition will be a creamy yellow to match that found on the existing residence. ANALYSIS Development Standards LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(7) and (E)(8)(a, c, g, h, and j) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non-contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration,, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) consistency in relation to height, (c) proportion of openings, (g) materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district, (h) roof shapes, and (j) scale. The Secretary of the interior Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. '. 242 SE 7th Avenue addition 2003-229-COA Marina Historic District • Page 3 Analysis The construction of the 769 sq. ft. addition and pool can be supported due to their inconspicuous locations at the rear of the dwelling and their complimentary scale, massing, and design. Neither the pool nor the addition exceeds the extant building's footprint and the required building setbacks of 10' to the side and 10' to the rear of the property have been met. Further, as the median height of the addition is 11', the required maximum height of 35' is not exceeded, pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K). The addition is in keeping with the style of the house with its stucco exterior, shingle roof, and fenestration. While the design is fairly simplistic, due to the depth of the lot and landscaping, the addition cannot be viewed from the right-of-way and formal design elements are therefore unnecessary. Based on this analysis, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(7), and (E)(8)(a), (c), (g), (h), and (j) and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate if Appropriateness for the construction of an addition and a pool 242 SE 7th Avenue, based on positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1 (E)(7) and (E)(8)(a), (c), (g), (h), and (j) and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of an addition and a pool 242 SE 7th Avenue, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(7) and (E)(8)(a), (c), (g), (h), and (j) and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of an addition and a pool at 242 SE 7t" Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(7) and (E)(8)(a), (c), (g), (h), and (j) and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Attachments:Survey, Proposed Site Plan, Elevations, Floor Plan, Site Map, &Photos Report Prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner s • r^ 1 J -- LEGEND ATLANTIC C _ AVENUE I i _ 1I111 MESSINGSCHLAGER RESIDENCE CERTIFICATE OF a a '(-1 3 BAR APPROPRIATENESS a HARBOUR >- CONDO S.E. 1ST ST. Q 242 S.E.7TH AVENUE FIDELITY ^ 3 o FEDERAL p '7 SUBJECT AREA Z BANK Z CC ................. _ = Li Vi ( f— U - 'CC SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PCNII:12-43-46-16-B3-000-0140 S.E. 2ND ST.'o x , APPROXIMATE ACREAGE:0.13 � ''� — x^ , ABRIDGED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ro SEAGATE GRACEY-BYRD LOT 14(LESS E. ammoJ TOWERS 20 FT.S.E.7TH AVE RAN) sam Q nom . mill ZONING:R-1-AA(SINGLE FAMILY ii RESIDENTIAL) EINEM1-1-1: MEM ~ FLUM:LD(LOW DENSITY �� (n RESIDENTIAL,0-5 UNITS/ACRE) • La= al •••••• . EXISTING LAND USAGE:SINGLE LLB ( FAMILY RESIDENCE S.E. 3RD ST. 0 WITHIN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 0 ZONE:#525 Q WITHIN CENSUS TRACT:#64.01 Z I— O w Lim CO Li z ` \ ui vi = PLANNING I— I & ZONING DEPARTMENT O O J N Z ( SEAGATE S.E. 4TH , ST. t` MANOR II o W . E DELRAY BEACH S I , WOMEN'S BUCIDA Z LONG-RANGE DIVISION CLUB J GEOGRAPHIC INFODIGITAL BASE-MARRMATION ce II wPING p SYSTEM w MAP REFERENCE►: LM704 Q il Q -- MAY Z003 — S.E. 6TH ST. MELALEUCA RD = MIMI BARRTON ,� �M �� APTIII i `�� �,�. OM =co CONDOS MI I ` w I♦ CHURCHILL MN MI7�, f (z,/ �= = •` CONDO .fs� '_ y �Q S.E. 7THI 1 1-1 n / r N202207 , , ABBREVIATIONS • A•Aro L.npth A.C.•Air Conditioner A/8•Aa-8u4 • ADJ.•Adjacent ..ASP„.• It B.C.R.•°ro.ord County Record B.N.•Bane,Work C.B.•Catch Doak, • 'C.O.S.•Gannet Wool.Stn.atun C.E.•Cone Easement C.F.Y.•Ceculat.d Field Traver. Cu.•Chord CN.ORC.•Chord B.orinp , • C.I.•Coot Iron C.N..Cont.Nonumenl nC . COL•Ceumn ui. G CONC.•Concrete .— L.Q--I- 1 J • (C)•Colculatod J . D,E.•oroinuge Earammt �N lj g40U< /I/ O.U.AND IAE.•Orginape ulicy o '# (D .O.sd or o w,rVB,p,°nc•E wet • j�c' A 13 4-,9 5'4m3 n) Fr. cone. EL•flotation°"° -.,.l ___ 3 S.o••• _ -_ monumen} —• o_ E.O.W..Edo.of wars - �•r • C4 rd"' — �1 PP.•S°all of r.n.nt d .., .J / di %i• .. •`•N I • ..O.•found _ /ram Q1 Jy N �i.�1� eG � 1 �y,Or'� • QLP...bon Pip. `,• v•. l;, - •' 'L'.lOOr • w (�(�''��JJ IF,•bon.Rool ,•Rl L.A.E.•.umita Access Eastownt II ,%�{" 0 N • tl s •S. O 1VV Lt.•Lowest hoar LLLe Law Noint.nanc.Eaoomo,t �y C� #tZ.hZ Q' a -�• 'M u.E.•uoint.nanu[o..m.n �-' �. a" 0 NE ',j'TOR..y '� N4a.KD.t Wtland C.ad.t'K v.niad Potwn • Q, co N,T.S..Not to ScaN �1^ Q"'(� )4. ( T rc R>rl p 6'NC,.B' s1 �.. N.T.T.'•Nil o e T.Too ,0 Qt CJ N C) OS vw�..:�PO°o.:ni.i (Td y' B�oGK II • N (� �'�' P.B.•Piot Book `r; 'C �' .O; } Q Iu�. P.B.CR_Pokn Stock County Floated `Q-� 5. 4 Z -Q `V • r 'I` P.C..Point'of Cunoture J qq `I 7 P.CA. v.mw,.nt Control Point I Z/,co' •t� � �� I 0) PG.•Vas. P.I.•Point el if Common �� • v P.O.C..'Point of Commonc.rrw,l I bbt '4. .�.CJt"�. g,,, r . P.0.8.•Point of BepMNg 1 i� • •- 0.0 •Sc`'^ P.F.C..Pent of Revs•Curvature '1'11 P.R.N.•P.m,pn.nt Rof.nnce Monument o. ^ W (P)•Plat `: -_. .�.�. .__. it,' i p -.. RRCC Rod. it Range t, 1 S•OOa (P) rETIA•%i i� V! R.O.E.•Roof OwrMnp Eoa°menl I- Zs J'O'(rll) I. R.P. Rods Point . Rim Right of way 1 LS -6* 11 • SEC. Sock. • ,,nn , SM sidewalk /- 1 11 r Cam,od-41 6 T 0 Tap of Bank 4 Trz,ea au°, a G, Lea—) T/R Top of Rock ' • Fri' Fki•Ve IA- TWPP'.To Township pP. S 34PCK (I 9 -- W(G& SAJ'(a4 • TW.•T I•�•c <'J U.E. U'loC.Utin.,t U.AND N.C.•Uhllty and Nainl.oonc. Eu.wMnl LEGEND • Cont..Un. • e On Lino f Wty e. CERTIFIED TO: waneuo4 Finc•(w*)_ PATRICIA MICHELLE MESSINGSCHLAGER 4 C1wk,Link I.nc.(C.L/.) 4 ONto O FN.Hydrant(fr.N) • Ws/Iola OAR. CTR MORTGAGE COMPANY,its successors and/or assigns o town Boon c.a.) LAWRENCE A CAPLAN,P.A. 1— Anchor and Guy Wire • Mon Rod and Cop OR.C.) ATTORNEY'STILE INSURANCE FUND,INC. owoo°Pow.,Pa. • Cont.Power Poo r:wR Point )• Pars:4T cerv,a oon.nt(PRN.) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: o Rotor letter wY.) a Cow T.V.( T,N.) LOT 14,BLOCK 119,GRACEY•BYRD SUBDIVISION,ACCORDING TO ■ Tel•Phone(TELE.) E7 coat. THE PLAT THEREOF,AS RECORDED IN PLAT•BOOK 10,PAGE 52,OF <rt. Existing El0,ot on THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,FLORIDA. s" MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY SGLE:/"O.20' NOTES/REVISIONS CE„ERAL NOTES: • corm-CCIPM ' El.vpia'ste n hNaon ore reorond.e to the Tspf WETS THE NIwNW TECIIIeCJI smote o AS SR PORK.B/THE P.N.r•n nmo Tot n....•..W.Rlw tMf O Notional Godrlic Vertical Datum,19291 aweless ttp"'m a oNAI. Aso t..PPIJ.S 01 C11.711J1 a017-., BASELINE ENGINEERING "a: f DRANN Bf:s•AI,/4 rlANOA AOYM$TR�TAt w TO CRON an.027,RMG'STAIDIR.• AND /?5'/0..� OQO[/�� D X DRl' s7Ra87'dF/NG'NefmJ :AD olhorwie.noted, T C•.srr�� 6 CNECRED BY:,tyN Underground features,ore not identiRed nor (AI or rJ.•• eA•A-n O2 g,eew.41anx.t• -ioeated except os may be indicated hereon. LAND SURVEYING, INC. p A This aVrwey.shows Dlo li,d easements onoright- Of S+i1�g7, 1.00 NW 1ST COURT.• I- 5-B I n K A FIELD BW10 PAGE: -.oy.Then,may exist o0Ci6onol mlrklions '1N0 J. KS .695 BOG pwiON,rtOR10A 33432 and/or ancumbronoaa,vhkh off.cl this Property D,AER R°CARS THE SIC,,,, 111E •RALSiD SEAL CIA 6439 1•'a• rain.. ,1 PARIr CHIEF: g.Lk VLf L.90 description provided l7jl client,or client'$ EB-5510 (Shc).17-0700 �y- .211'.1 S.E.. 7 Avenue..., Dzirt,,/ Bectok, R. 5..10-9 IS FOR txa/sm wlisPO•AA,D TNe oar.CS NO sVAUD. Pur OR N,w p p.y l J SURVEY DATE: .O pr. e. IS FOR W CoisE 0H NP05E3 OW T AOf 610. VV1D. JOB NO. 1���- 4I 13 0Y"° / ar / • • ' 4 • Ak._ \ -\... : i IX. ' '''-• .:,;,,,kl:-.4., f , - • • It - ' f„. st,:;,:•• . - 1". ..wk-;Ft.'"' I 4. ‘. c.,1 1':.,"7,,,Y•IA, ' ' .4 ilk ,,,.. , ‘,41•14 • 440 0.,.........44-,-t - , - ‘ • -... r 4\• 1pii,•,,, '' ii,.0k; •y.: i / . . • . - N- ,I . s' • ' ' i 44. -...C.1. .., A tl•.• • ',,' ' ? '--114%‘-- ° V 4k.t. • ''' ., 1 ,!,,,...,......3.,".. ,.. ..... , . • 1. •.: ,..,....i.„1.,•:. ,_ • . p:a -1, • -.6....; • -.e44-.9% .i'lii.tift—`'• '''' . ° , 4 '..,,t,..-Sle'AP a 4.,-....4.. *•., .6.0'.A • •''Y :r.l','A•"'AO`''.' ++1P5r 4'. ''-t,, $ • 1. 1.,..*' • N' ,:`-' :**A. _ , _...... i •:. -% . „, ti _ I . .. : , ..,_, A ....,. .....- : .r.• i ..: \_., ,,• 4 A*- 1 `- ---' -I' it I t :# ..., ." ...."._(.41,1: •, ' " / " ..,._ „. ..„ .. ,..... . —"N410.11r•ft. , ,,, . _ . -vim -4 ,.. -N 242 SE 7th Avenue - South Elevation , . -- - .!.; '• :‘ fr. .., •,. : ' t• ,N v, - • 4, 0.' • .4,,_ t ov, !,-, ,— -.,„ —. . ,.....- " .!.N, .4:-:-.,::z.. • -•:, . . - / , ,.. .- •-4,4 - • r..,- , • •• .• .. , . i---- ' . , ....-...... ., . . .-i w z , .,. . siro;i.-,. . ' 4 ,'... '`4 'I •'N'titry 4.. li ...-- ., , 1 ---:._ Nt4 Iff,„... < ,y4: , '-'i k •,_. : , . ,.. 4 ,..,'40 --.......%-• ,0 t•,' •`,- f'' ''. t le 1 .4(4 — • -•;.1 .4 tt ' i,` ....4,,, 4 • --4„.9.„... , , •,..,i• t , \lot, . II .• I. ,. .:... , ,- - — _ 41F.... • ...... * ,...` - , , •!..)II[ Front (East) Facade / LOT 14,BLOCK 119 • 92.48'19'J PROPERTY LNE� • 8711'41• .,` -10'REAR SETBACK AREA COMPUTATIONS •--SHINGLES AND PITCH 70 HATCH EXIST.TYPICAL--• S.� • COMPUTATIONS �� / AREA TOTALS 4. O- III FIRST FLOOR A/C (ADD.) 724 S.F. TOTAL LIVING AREA724 S.F. gSTORAGE 45 S.F.- - - - TOTAL AREA 7��S.F.EXISTING RESIDENCE 1,366 S.F. tt\o w SSIDE ELEVATION J) I LOT 6,750 S.F. aSCALE: 1/4'=1'-0' /( y(1 • u 1 . E<-----,.....? .. . f\ 10'SIDE � c11 SETBACK •PE11n UNE 10'SIDE SETBACK 1-REPLALE EXIST.YIN.W/2868HC • /% A JN PROPERTY EXIST.GAB 3 END ."---ROOF TO REMAIN —• / .ti 8 // /' / 8 — n • / in '� • 30•-0• • • • 26'-0' 4"-0• Of r • • 1111 EXIST. 1-STORY RESIDENCE t LAv Hcxc X 1 AM. laI FRONT ELEVATION TO REMAIN I) ,� SCALE: 1/4•-1'-0' STOR. WC o O - 8' Q -0-CCG 8-0 CCC ' BATH L7 g,-0•CVO RELOCATED ACV o I n' LI- „..,%,z 'S S ®o®le U NEW ACU • Z 0 N J '~ �`' BEDROOM Pg. k4....._. —09 z CO • Q = L,J ? W-0•VAULT CCG //� F // ®® ®® —_1 i= i o I 6• 7-6 m • I� • 1 t) III , f�4 ' /' 0 0 0 0 LOT 14,BLOCK 119,CRGAL AB BYRD SUBDINSION,ACCORDING p. • Q 6�/ TO THE PLAT THEREOF,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10. • —.11111 �Upl� -- -- • PAGE FLORIDAORTHEPUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH O Hii S� ' '' if V/ SIDE ELEVATION O DECK AL` { SCALE: 1/4'-1•-0• PDR �l� . EXIST. 18' ASPHALT j EDRIVE XIST {PROPERTY9j ! • LINE 9031'OB' 18'-10'X 10'-0' 11 \\6 / \ g SIGNATURE_ DECK DRAUkM --- CI -1 DATE: S.E. 7TH AVENUE - — - - - - - c.4-1 - - • o. I EXIST.HOUSE I PROJECT NO REAR ELEVATION SHEET": SCALE: 1/4'-1'-0' .ti DEIRAY BEACH pE�AY, 1�e HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ������ MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT 411F, 1993 2001 21993 007 Agent: Claudio Camilucci, Authorized Agent Project Name: Jagger's Universe -2003-221-COA Project Location: 275 North Swinton Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing sign on a contributing property, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). ..; BACKGROUND ,_ The subject property consists of Lot 1, Block 66 of the Strafford Atta Bowe Replat and contains a 1,763 sq. ft. contributing building, constructed in 1926 in the Mediterranean- Revival style. The site contains approximately .26 acre and lies at the southeast corner of NE 3rd Street and North Swinton Avenue in the Old School Square Historic District. On October 2, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved a Class V Site and Landscape Plans for the conversion of the single family home to retail, which included the installation of associated parking and landscaping. The conditions of approval have been addressed as mandated with the Board's approval and the improvements are currently being installed. The applicant is now before the Board for review and approval of a free-standing sign. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes the installation of a free-standing, two sided sign constructed of plywood (MDO) to accommodate the.oval shape. The face sign will be painted ivory with a terra cotta border and support posts and hunter green text. The oval shaped sign face and decorative posts (with round caps) displays the building's address at the top and "Jagger's Universe" with "Functional Art-Unusual Gifts" below on the sign body. Located at the northwest corner of the property, approximately 10' from the north and west property lines, the sign will be oriented perpendicularly to the existing building permitting viewing from both north and south bound traffic on North Swinton Avenue as well as traffic from NE 3`d Street. The free standing sign measures 48" (4') wide (not including the 4" square sign posts) with a 32" (2'8") high sign body and 78" (6'6") overall Meeting Date:June 4,2003 Agenda Item:III.E. Jagger 2003-221-COA • 275 N.Swinton Avenue , Page 2 height. The area of the sign body measures 10.6 sq. ft. The sign will be located approximately 3' to the north of the palm tree at the northwest corner of the building and will not interfere with any of the existing landscaping. No lighting is proposed at this time. REVIEW BY OTHERS. The Delray Beach Sign Review Board reviewed and approved the location and sign design and dimensions as proposed during its meeting on May 16, 2003 with the condition that the sign colors compliment those found on the building. ANA The Board shall consider: SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(1)(b) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Free-standing signs" A free-standing sign is not affixed to any other structure. It may be either a pole sign or a monument sign. Neither the pole nor the base of the monument shall be considered in calculation of the area of the sign face. A free-standing sign may not have more than two faces. LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and states: The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7). LDR Section 4.6.7 (H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (E) with respect to height and area. Jagger 2003-221-COA 275 N.Swinton Avenue Page 3 Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building façade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the architecture. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts, however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining"and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. One such standard states: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Conclusion The proposed signage is appropriate in relation to style, dimensions, and design with respect to the contributing building and the surrounding neighborhood, however, the proposed color scheme does not compliment that found on the historic building. It is therefore recommended that the terra cotta color proposed for the posts be replaced with the lavender shade used as a trim color on the building and incorporated into the design of the sign. This has been attached as a condition of approval. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(h), no sign shall be located in such a manner that it will become a hazard to automotive or pedestrian traffic nor shall nay sign or lighting Jagger 2003-221-COA 275 N.Swinton Avenue Page 4 be placed as to obstruct the vision of the driver or any motor vehicle where vision is necessary for safety. The sign's proposed location meets the required setback of 10' and is located outside of the 20' site visibility triangle, which has been supported by the City Engineer. Per LDR Section 4.6.7(G), since the building is located within the Old School Square Historic Arts District zoning district (OSSHAD), the sign, when located outside of the required 10' setback, may not exceed 12' in height and width and as proposed the sign height measures 78" (6'6") with a width if 48" (4'). As the sign meets the requirements as stated in 4.6.7(G), positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards can be made once the issue of the proposed color scheme has been addressed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS. A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA for the installation of a sign for 275 N. Swinton Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA for the installation of a sign for 275 N. Swinton Avenue, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation with the basis stated. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign for 275 N. Swinton Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed color scheme for the sign compliments those colors found on the associated building. Attachments:Survey, Sign Details Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner • i — el-8 i' 11/ 1 •$. i _ JS � TIONAL _ ' -. Y�� i - f .. _ ram • I a • • • yf K �►-cP �' �..�`'- s "e- ems r5 �+ • 1 ems.,, tr '^t g ."•.to -: rsi_€-3 d1 � y Ica ` \ ` r ..r_Ti#15, s :, ►} : 8' t, - ► l cl 3' . � -4V Te e c c - r? : ,1mo .cct r • eac.o s �'c�o y t� - „i _ imi,„,„_-,,-,,,,.;;-‘(*rio V..){s; 51,00 ,-- ''' - -.- .-0,?2,., r i1 1 Og G 9J COP - 7t T GoTTf4 c.c `{ `t }` 'T ,- . h = Y iF GF r ii z sx ii iii.,..„.., . „. c-k� �j� ii _ i OJT l " • I ct rcuT : THf E L -ulr • e St6h) 5r�r� NY�hs► 3,1+ oN ouw e I I 5c. t#WhtowR•� yk h aF mG co i��T • � � PT f $ Yi `i''xcr‘ Po4s cowAP iT 6' UTILITY E, EigOORD$QF • j f `-�,—' &1°32'22"E 7567 14 ......_ X FOUND2'X2' i�� SETi� 1'F, CONCRETE MONUMENT �rf ►rirk(UNNUMBERED) 1 FEK� E l .-2l,Q� 3 —_ a'WEST j �� �Ll l�g _ -�. FOUND.V'If ' UJ _ 0� - f ' CO1 ETE-A1Ot3#JMEUT •. : 4- a AE&iPRt cAL A 701,-OF�V it), pF �(4 F. 2.• j_ (UNNUMBERED) . + 1940 OF THE RECC 6,07-7 r R$ �E 8"• �o • \e • - • kEL„ w� . 7o/,)e oZ1vE Z,. 5 Tod �,, of Zi`t �2i �o(Co • • • S�''_roe of GJR i..-. 4 - 1©'ILE ; 'i" � • e(. •`GO/JG. a0 i _(' 55 roPO.c w . 1' �'� -� PoRcN •• 22.GS O,c�z3 "1 .=1X 11 E 0 ' . e,-1 - ;I -- w.:., / is} A_ X L t . tea .,-!. / L�T17,4 �� / - 1 4 c' 2.E1 t aEdcz r; 6. 5 Lu _ Is �.‘•A , "'C o t p /�� • � ' 1 t ci g 5 / ''.-- i V .: PY \._C\1 r - N_ t . e , . .. 1 CD--5 4 R - o "� FOUN rX2' CONCRETE eaFrat'p MONUMENT * ® N1°32'22"W.MOO' yN9 a'�i.Qi.oA Z �NNUri&6RE9 ' (661.09 (sc.) ! 1\14 44 715616' 275NS,WI NIONAYQVUE . DELBAY BEACH _.. DEIBAY BEA61 Itztral j HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD �I I MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT g i i r,, 1993 2001 __ 1993 2U01 Agent: Garat Oates, Owner Project Name: Bull Bar Project Location: 2 East Atlantic Avenue ITEM-- BEFORE THE, BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of two wall signs on a contributing property and an associated waiver, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). 'BACKGROUND ,'. The subject property consists of Lot 6, Block 69 of the Town of Delray and contains a 1,763 sq. ft. contributing commercial building, constructed in 1913 in the Masonry Vernacular style. The property lies at the southeast corner of South Swinton Avenue and East Atlantic Avenue in the Old School Square Historic District. Zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), the proposed bar will be located on the first floor (northwest corner) of the building which provides the front and west elevations for signage. During its meeting of June 6, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and approved a wall sign for the tenant the "Ice Lounge." An original submission was considered by the Board on May 2, 2001, however, upon review, the Board directed the applicant to return with a revision to the dimensions and the character of the sign which was originally 72" (6') wide and 42" (3'6") high and included light blue in the color scheme. The applicant resubmitted the design to orient the sign vertically rather than horizontally, reduced the measurements to 24" (2') in width and 72" (6') in length, and eliminated the light blue color which was approved and installed. During its meeting of February 7, 1996, the Board reviewed a proposal for elevation changes to the contributing buildings at 2 E. Atlantic Avenue and 11 S. Swinton Avenue which included the application of an exterior stucco finish, an exterior paint change, removal of brick veneers, clay tile features, and pilasters, installation of lighting, alteration of the parapet and roof line, and installation of doors. The alteration of the building was approved, however, the approval period expired prior to initiation of the project and the applicant returned to the Board for re-consideration of the project on March 3, 1999. The Board reviewed and approved the project at this time and the project was undertaken. Meeting Date:June 4,2003 Agenda Item: III.E. Bull Bar 2003-234-COA-HPB 2 E.Atlantic Avenue Page 2 The applicant is now before the Board for review and approval of two wall signs and an associated waiver. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes the installation of two wall signs constructed of urethane with a sandblasted finish. The oval shaped sign on the front façade (E. Atlantic Avenue) will display the "Bull Bar" text with a bull fish logo centered between the two words while the west façade sign (S. Swinton Avenue) will display the "Bull Bar" with "Established 2003" below and the bull fish logo centered atop the text. Both sign faces will be painted red with a black text and frame and incorporate a multi-colored bull fish logo (blue, green, and yellow). The main sign will be located between the first and second floors above the existing awning while the secondary sign will be located on the northwest corner of the west elevation between the first and second floors. The wall sign on the north elevation measures 144" (12') wide by 12" (1') high and 2" in depth with a sign area of 12 sq. ft. The wall sign on the west elevation measures 48" (4') wide by 28" (2'4") high and 2" in depth with an overall area of 9.3 sq. ft. No lighting is proposed at this time. The proposal includes a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7), which states that no more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs within one lot, parcel, or development. REVIEW BY OTHERS The Delray Beach Sign Review Committee reviewed the locations and sign design and dimensions during its meeting on May 27, 2003. The Committee recommended that the color of the copy match the green of the neighboring "Safari Steakhouse" flat wall sign (a dark green) and that the proposed red background behind the logo be decided per the Historic Preservation Board's discretion. They further recommended that consideration be given to replace one of the flat wall signs with a projecting sign. ANALYSIS The Board shall consider: SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(1)(a) addresses Sign Design Standards for"Wall Signs" A flush mounted sign. There is one sign face for a wall sign. A wall sign shall not project more than eight inches from the wall upon which it is mounted. Types of wall signs are canopy signs, mansard signs, and painted signs. Bull Bar 2003-234-COA-HPB 2 E.Atlantic Avenue Page 3 LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and states: The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7). LDR Section 4.6.7 (H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. a) Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (E) with respect to height and area. b) Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. c) Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building façade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the architecture. Bull Bar 2003-234-COA-HPB C. 2 E.Atlantic Avenue Page 4 The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation • No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts, however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining"and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. One such standard states: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Waiver Analysis Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7), not more than one of any type of sign nor more than two signs are permitted per lot, parcel, or development. The applicant has requested a waiver to this requirement to permit the installation of two wall signs on the property. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: a.) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b.) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c.) Shall not create an unsafe situation; and, d.) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. As the building sits directly on the corner of East Atlantic Avenue and South Swinton Avenue, there are a limited number of options for signage. Therefore, the proposed wall signs are appropriate for the location and scale of the building. In addition, as corner lots are permitted more than one sign and the installation of a free standing or projecting sign is not a viable option, the request can be supported. Given the above analysis, the waiver request for two wall signs for the property will not grant a special privilege. Further, no public facilities will be diminished and the installation of two signs will not create unsafe situations. As neither of the proposed signs exceeds the required 30 sq. . ft. area per LDR Section 4.6.7(G) or will project more than eight inches, positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B) can be made to supported a recommendation for the waiver. Bull Bar 2003-234-COA-HPB 2 E.Atlantic Avenue Page 5 Conclusion The proposed signage is appropriate in relation to the style and design of the signage in the surrounding neighborhood. The signs compliment those found on the surrounding properties such as The Rectory, Safari Steakhouse, and Sweet Art by Lucila and are necessary as the buildings lies on a corner lot with zero front and side setbacks. In addition, the sign meets the required wall sign standards as stated in LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(1)(a) as it will not project more than 8" from the wall. While the secondary wall facing South Swinton Avenue meets the requirement for area, the scale is too large for the proposed location on the building as required by LDR Section 4.6.7(H)(2)(a). It is therefore recommended that the sign be reduced in width from the proposed 48" (4') to 36" (3') and reduced in height from 28" (2'4") to 24" (2'). This has been attached as a condition of approval. Further, the proposed color scheme does not compliment that found on the building. The red color is garish as it relates to the other colors found on the building. The red should be used as an accent color (such as a border) or changed to a dark burgundy which would be more refined. It is recommended that the colors be re-considered to incorporate the existing colors on the building such as forest green, yellow, and white or those found in the bull fish logo. This has also been attached as a condition of approval. Positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.6.7(G) and (H)(2)(b) and (c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards can be made once the conditions of approval relating to the proposed color scheme and the dimension of the sign proposed for the west elevation have been addressed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS, , A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA for the installation of a sign for The Bull Bar, 2 E. Atlantic Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(a), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA for the installation of a sign for The Bull Bar, 2 E. Atlantic Avenue, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(a), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Bull Bar 2003-234-COA-HPB 2 E.Atlantic Avenue Page 6 RECOMMENDATION Waiver Recommend to the City Commission approval of the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7) to permit more than one of any type of sign or more than two signs on one parcel for 2 E. Atlantic Avenue, The Bull Bar, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Certificate of Appropriateness Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of two wall signs for The Bull Bar, 2 E. Atlantic Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(a), (G)(2)(b), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed color scheme for the signs compliment those colors found on the associated building and logo. 2) That the wall sign for the west elevation be reduced in width from 48" (4') to 36" (3') and reduced in height from 28" (2'4")to 24" (2'). Attachments:Elevations, Sign Details, Color/Logo Samples Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner �+E"tj . I � Ren BULL ��K ESTABLISHED 2003 .sommpamt 131Ax-v- coLonmrisd- 12' 121 211 YY w $ _-.._�....� ' S "r._c. _ KF..3�Nir'4,' v 7 i..y L t' ,i..t-h 4 ,.. • • r. T:. } • fix.. • t • '_ r '=c•�r.. _ 4 -, i`�>. -:-• _•, "`sue"rL. " .� .. 3 'z-� �a • 3�. s' .: _ "" - _. - •.,`� �.-:._ � _,�-_ ..."- .v _ ilia"' n • .e=; 3€ ro " 3. v -.a'� y r amV.,� ? . t£-a ,E... -F '.-v ,-"_,'r ._=g,t1,-,• ;: ` _.-- . .-'tee--.. i`�n "�s.. '- 'i..-7�` - : �. ?.e -._ ., DELBAY BEAC71 DElBAY BEAQt HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 16 MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT 11�I� 1993 2001 1993 Agent: Bright Image Signs Project Name: S&R Beauty Supplies Project Location: 103 NW 5th Avenue TE,M .: BEFORE THE BOARD ...` The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a monument sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND . The subject property consists of the west 51' of Lot 8, Block 27 and is zoned GC (General Commercial). Located at the northeast corner of NW 5th Avenue and NW 1st Street, the property contains a one-story 1,330 sq. ft., non-contributing commercial building within the West Settler's Historic District. Built in 1952 as a restaurant, the building was designed by Samuel Ogren, Jr. An addition was constructed in 1962. Presently, the building possesses minimal architectural merit with the exception of recent additions of the portico and decorative cornices along the building's facade. During its meeting of July 18, 2001, the applicant requested a site plan modification to construct a 165 sq. ft. addition at the northeast corner of the building and associated elevation changes that included the construction of a portico with engaged columns at the front (east) entrance and decorative cornices. The addition and elevation changes were approved. The elevation changes were completed, however the addition was never constructed. On April 16, 2003, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a COA request for the installation of a monument sign with backlighting. After much discussion, the Board denied the request based on the style and location of the sign. The Board recommended that the applicant return with a new design for a free-standing or projecting sign which could be illuminated from the ground or with lighting attached to the building. The applicant is now before the Board for the installation of a monument sign. Meeting Date:June 4,2003 Agenda Item:III.F. 511 log S&R Beauty Supplies 2003-240-COA 103 NW 51h Avenue Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of the installation of a double-sided, monument sign. The proposed sign cabinet will be constructed of aluminum with a stucco finish to match the building with white lexan text. The sign body will be painted gold with cream supports and a decorative arch to match the design elements and colors found on the building. The text will read "S&R Beauty Supply." The overall sign measurements are 49" (4'1") in height and 59" (4'10") in width. The sign face measures 44" (3'8") high by 36" (3'0) wide totaling 11 sq. ft in area with the sign set back approximately 2' east of the ultimate right-if-way line for NW 5th Avenue, perpendicular to the building. The previous sign submittal included a double-sided, monument sign constructed of sintra with a stucco exterior frame and plexiglas for the sign's text. The text consisted of a white lexan panel and black text with backlighting. During the original review of the monument sign, the applicant expressed her concern that a free-standing sign with exterior lighting could encourage vandalism. Based on the concern stated by the Board, the applicant has re-designed the sign to decrease the lighted portion of the sign (the exposed lexan panels) and has introduced an arch to discourage passersby from sitting atop the sign while maintaining the monument style. REVIEW BY OTHERS' During its meeting of May 27, 2003, the Delray Beach Sign Review Committee recommended that the sign be approved as proposed. ANALYSIS a The Board shall consider: SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(1)(b) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Free-standing signs" A free-standing sign is not affixed to any other structure. It may be either a pole sign or a monument sign. Neither the pole nor the base of the monument shall be considered in calculation of the area of the sign face. A free-standing sign may not have more than two faces. LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and states: S&R Beauty Supplies 2003-240-COA 103 NW 5m Avenue Page 3 The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7). LDR Section 4.6.7 (H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (G) with respect to height and area. Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building façade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interrupt the views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the established architecture. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts, however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining" and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. S&R Beauty Supplies 2003-240-COA 103 NW 5`h Avenue Page 4 One such standard states: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Conclusion The proposed signage conveys the design elements and color scheme from the building. In fact, the applicant has improved on the original design of the sign with the reduction of the lexan and backlit areas and the addition of the arch element at the top of the sign. The design, dimensions, and color palette are appropriate in relation to the style, scale, massing, and design in the area, however, as the sign is intended to highlight the location of the establishment, it is recommended that the street address be incorporated into the arch design. Furthermore, this will be a requirement upon adoption of the City's new sign code. As proposed, the sign compliments the surrounding commercial signage such as the backlit, plexiglas monument signs found at the S.D. Spady Museum and St. Paul's Church to the north. The proposed overall sign height will be 59" (4'10") with an area of approximately 11 sq. ft for the sign body which will not interfere with the line of sight of the building's façade and will meet the free-standing sign requirements pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(d), which states that a sign may be placed within the front yard setback (2' setback) if it is not greater than 7' in height and, if located within the setback, that the sign body measures less than 20 sq. ft. Based on this analysis, positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7, the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of •the Interior's Standards can be made, however, a condition is attached that the street address be incorporated into the arch of the sign. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA for the installation of a monument sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA for the installation of a monument sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a- c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. V S&R Beauty Supplies 2003-240-COA 103 NW 5m Avenue Page 5 .�._ RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a monument sign for 103 NW 5th Avenue, S&R Beauty Supplies, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7.(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), (G)(3)(d), (G)(7), and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the street address (number) be incorporated into the arch of the sign. Attachments:Survey, Sign Detail Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner �.' �; ;•� 4'-10 " ,1� _ Bright y. ', i - .... ,• 7 v ' Image . , : ..,... ,._., _ : . n ,. -.3wIto.1......„......s - ray ` SIGN SYSTEMS i ELECTRICAL t ; u_^ DISPLAYS COMPLETE t sa rt:-�` '��s - NEON r r. , . .:: r ,ca a ? COMMERCIAL& "� F; RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ' S&R " 1,,..„ .___-w> . :r SERVICE BEAUTYUPPL 9 S & R AWARD WINNING SUPPLY �.3...# r� DESIGN } frq _ 561 -278-7814 � , -.. g � _ BEAUTY 2LFK t D6EACH FLORIDA. ���y Disconn + ' M switch ELRAY 33483 r a LICENCED o-1860P - ..._- __ SUPPLY Photo simulation of proposed sign scale: 64.33 b►signs@bellsouth.net . ll/L Listed Since 1979 Grade 17 CU5ToML2. o S & R SIGN AREA CALCULATIONS: ) ,,_ i ,' I �� BEAUTY 76.5footfrontage. N SUPPLIES 4'10"x 4'1" = 19.7 sq. Ft proposed. \ p •• _ L 1.5 inch angle welded to steel pipe 2.5 inch ---------- a - DATE 2500 psi concrete in well compacted soil 2'-0 " 5-4-03 DRAWN BY: JI5L DESCRIPTION OF WORK: - Design, permit, manufacture and install one double face internally illuminated all aluminum welded sign cabinet with stucco finish and white lexan faces. Faces are Proposed sign Scale: 3/4 " = 1 foot MI11111111111 lettered with computer generated vinyl graphics applied first surface. Lighting from • DRAINING ballast and HO fluorescent lamps. As per drawing shown. NOTE: Due to limitations of the printing process, 1 of 2 printed colors can vary from actual colors. ©Bright Image,Inc.2000 This is an original,unpublished drawing,submitted with a project we are planning for you. It is not to be copied,reproduced,exhibited or shown to anyone outside your organization without written permission of Bright Image,Inc. 1 7 e. y ELECTRICAL DATA: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: if--toiiii• -t "� z vy 4 _'3-: _ �1"4 S-O 'a �i VOLTAGE: 120 Bright r —.7.-- �� �� �"�` 1° TOTAL BALLASTS 1 Design, permit, manufacture and install r T � ' d�� t one (1) internally illuminated cabinet 11 pal y ? 4 f ew TOTAL AMP LOAD 3.8 • * as per drawing shown m a e �1 I o F 4 NOTE Visible Disconnect switch I ' I U 1 - 0, wi _ - j ii SIGN SYSTEMS ::�" � � =� NOTES: 6 l ram= U All components U/L Listed v t! � ,,,,,„„_,.4.,: R A) .090 aluminum skin welded to 1.5 inch COMPLETE ELECTRICAL Sign rounded asper NEC 250 DISPLAYS '�• � ' • � g - aluminum angle welded frame NEON `,�J400004 o i fi, p ,o l/ ,, ,, ,�t Primary by others B) Plexiglass inserts COMMERCIAL& ` 4��� "" 1 -20 ampCIRCUIT w/#12 THHN WIRE C) High Output 120 volt sign ballast RESIDENTIAL DESIGN V ,.. 1 -20 amp DISCONNECT SWITCH per internal in sign cabinet AWARD WINNING Sign Frame Assembly Flat Face DESIGN 2t� �,�, circuit D) High out put lamps and lamp sockets *w E) Sign frame stucco finish 5 61 -27 8-7 814 J040 town.i ' COLOR SCHEDULE Internal sign frame welded to pipe 561-278-0259 FAX - .-> support as shown ""' 375 NE 3rd STREET G) Ballast wires in 1/2 reenfield and .040 DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA 33483 COPY WHITE g A 1 Z . .. - : CABINET BRONZE aluminum raceways internal in cabinet LICENCED u-18604 ' COVER BRONZE H) Cabinet will have drain holes for water 1 TRIM MATCH BLDG. to escape bisigns@bellsouth.net I) Disconnect switch on cabinet or pole U/L Listed uminum skin cover Since 1979 All components U/L Listed Listing Marks: J) All material and fasteners meet 3004.4 t Sign grounded as per NEC 250 Listing mark sign section label shall LISTED K) All electrical components are UL listed be on each letter and transformer by qualified electrical M) Sign grounded according to NEC250 CUSTOM JZ ..-- Aluminum Primary 11y others enclosure. teeung laboratory aleThe fir-5 blank space Ideritlfias the ELECTRIC SIGN SECTION N) Signs manufactured as per NEC 600 9 \ 1 -20 amp CIRCUIT w/#12 THHN WIRE NO.loc•t S & R .00 iiii weld• i i� number of each sign section.The l l I 0) Min. One (1) 20 AMP circuit per sign 1 -20 amp DISCONNECT SWITCH per second blank space Indicates circuit the total number of sign moons. P) One (1) visible disconnect switch per BEAUTY SUPPLIES Plastic-Sign Ballast Specifications circuit WIND LOADING • Typical spot weld to secure 1. The ballast shall be electromagnetic skin to angle frame core&coil design Q) Installed as per Sect.1606.1.7 of 2001 2. The ballast shall be provided with Florida Building Code. Detail A Aluminum to frame fabrication/welded integral leads,color coded to ANSI 1. Wind Speed....140-MPH DATE standard C82.1 2. importance Factor...1.0, Cat.II I-17-03 3. The ballast shall operate from a 3. Exposure...N.E.S.W. Directions nominal line voltage of 129 volts+/- DRAWN BY: • 10%,60 Hz. 4. C:C...design pressure=-42.2 p.s.f.PHIS wDW P JALn f CABINET&ELECTRICAL 4. The ballast shall operate the lamps at Per ASCE7-98. Simplified w....,..11 as par SIC J DETAIL _ 60 Hz. Procedure 1606.2.5 not employed. es- � , ELL�CE DCT4I1- I It Eoal.IuQi.0 Al maln✓^uL Lind tad dl/v +�I l r+Gf Milo IRgt1 ails PI LNOmad Meta l +I SO ,�gpwllyt Y\L'C 1SY. 1..• A.ONak.•�flmY &sir:+ill k .j • DRAWING dlwiqu r l..sar lmitlad a � £,41,riNG 1'ILiMA Ot ri!M FRS 813LJJ, 1-20 sup(1BCUIT,,+KT1111N Vilest: 1 of 1 1-20 NF TSKITI]11W , s1iiK 1s P L[KiC1EP ry CONDUIT FROM CABINET CO 11'l To PRIMARY �A1i Ti LI1C1T11/!1 i ` =V sUP D BY OT1-013. NOTE: Due to limitations of the printing process, printed colors can vary from actual colors. ©Bright Image, Inc.2000 This is an original,unpublished drawing,submitted with a project we are planning for you. It is not to be copied,reproduced,exhibited or shown to anyone outside your organization without written permission of Bright Image,Inc. I T IN �Wro 20.0' . �.� I' LOT 7 Q3z —t BLOCK 27 i�Q s 9' / 1 & 2 STORY BUILDING m2Wii.1,i//ii,i/iiii/7i NJiiiii / ///,,, I + r_ -o--tea } s 84.60' to ._ d'�. �'O t I20.53 FOUND 58" IRON ..4.6'l�. 0 6 0.6' ROD WITH CAP 2 m �-' 0'5 #LB 353 a w �"• 9ph DESCRIPTION: k ,Z;� D PA VED CHAIN LINK o � FENCE THE WEST 51.0 FEET OF LOT 8, BLOCK 27, �o LOT 8 ACCORDING TOWN OF /NTON TO (NOW PLAT LRAY THEREOF AS), Z N BLOCK 27 Lu N RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 3 (SHEET 12.1' y CO 2), OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM _ O ;"""" N w BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.2 � '^ S. , 25.3' , o O . , C9 `►J N/ ry N Lr) I� p h FLOOR N% �/ 0 v0 N N +19.61 ����� NOTE: ELEVATIONS SHOWN WERE TAKEN 6/11/98 f��� J 12•9' ' Zv �3 %� 1 STORYFENCE m I; BUILDING o ON LINE 6 �o a SIG.%) 1e ,__ __,,.7 CONC PAD AC:f_c,c, ��, .6 .__9o�; OR PUBLIC �r, MAP OF PHONE o� 1B', FOUND 5 8" IRON I S 6 . r. ROD WITH CAP i 12.2' """3" "' "' BOUNDARY SUR VE Y f ,,pr- a Jot,- 20.0' �- #L B 353 r 84.60' (7f �, OUND CROSS ♦FH t 5 f - • I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA CUT (NO POLE OVERHEAD BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 61G17-6, FLORIDA NUMBER) UTILITY LINES ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES BRICK & OLEGEND: CONC WALK N • = CENTERLINE ?c,t_tdi_ ' +18.72 q N. W. 1ST S TREE T +19.62 PAUL= CONCRETE A UL D. ENGLE ! PAVED / NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE ANDTHE ORIGINAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER #570 FH = FIRE HYDRANT LICENSED SURVEYOR DAND MAPPER. SEAL OF A FLORfDA +19.62 = ELEVATION BASED ON • BENCH MARK: TOP NA TIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL O'BRIEN, SUI TER & O'BRIEN, INC. NAIL & WASHER DATUM 1929, SOURCE: PALM ELEVATION +19.62LAND SURVEYORS BEACH COUNTY BENCH MARK " - CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION#LB353 SURVEYOR AND MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: PAUL D. ENGLE FLOOD ZONE: X 2601 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33483 (561) 276-4501 732-3279 FAX 276-2390 ' L.P. = LIGHT POLE DATE OF SURVEY SCALE: 1" = IA, WM = WATER METER JUL Y 9, 2001 FIELD BOOK PAGE NO. ORDER NO.: © COPYRIGHT 1998 O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC. D239 74 98-120d"A • HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: June 4, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Ill. a ITEM: Independence Title (204 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District)—Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and Associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements,.and Waiver Requests for the Conversion of a Single Family Home to Offices.. N.E. 11TH ST. . N.E. 10TH GENERAL DATA: _ Owner Ronald L. Platt, ESQ. N.E. 9TM ST. Applicant/Agent Cope Architects, Inc. (Roger Cope) 1 ■i . Location Northeast corner of Northeast - ��+ BOULEVARD 2nd Avenue and Northeast 5th z m••.1111 Q 2:>137 ��,`� Terrace. ��"""'� % , 1-(°. Property Size 0.73 Acres _< H.E. m, St �e tli ill uture Land Use Map TRN (Transitional) `� �uiUhI� - 0�x urrent Zoning RO (Residential/Office—Del J � ounEl-'I ���� Ida Park Historic District) b E.6TH ST._ 4 ,� Adjacent Zoning North: RO (Residential/Office—Del [ ``ill, �.:�i�,` Ida Park Historic District ton-z ` „:„ `°y" East: RO (Residential /Office—Del o ` , 'N.E.'«<:5TH , TERN. g Ida Park Historic District) -N` i ._ South: RL (Multiple Family _ ;�,, ` � Residential—Low Density) t o' � N.E. sTH CT. West: R-1-AA(Single Family �.`.`�- — iQ Residential) 0 N.E - STH Sr L•i Existing Land Use Single Family _ I Residential &Vacant a 1 si Proposed Land Use Conversion of a single - N.E. <TH ST. family home POST NM • to offices. OFFICE um m • IN Water Service Existing on site. . �. Sewer Service Existing on site. _INN INI � , 0 _ NM IN MI 1.1 .- IN - - N.E. 3N0 ST. _ u.i — _ I ■1 W 11 _ _ z--z z .� _= _ ■1 III. A. w 6. ITEM BEFORE THE `BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 204 Dixie Boulevard, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class V Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; ❑ Design Elements; ❑ Demolition; and, ❑ Waiver Requests The subject property is located on the southeast corner of Dixie Boulevard and NE 2'd Avenue. BACKG�R:OUN.D . Zoned Residential Office (RO), the property consists of .47 acres described as the southwesterly 25' of Lot 14 and Lots 15 and 16, Block 10, Del-Ida Park. The property currently contains a 1,153 square foot contributing, Mission-Revival style, single family dwelling and associated contributing garage constructed in 1930. On September 16, 1992, a Certificate of Appropriateness was administratively approved for the replacement of jalousie windows for single hung sash windows which were installed. There are no other recent administrative or Historic Preservation Board reviews of this property. The applicant has submitted a Class V Site Plan application and associated waivers for the conversion of the single family residence to an office building and is now before the Board for consideration. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal includes the following: o Conversion of a 1,153 sq. ft. one-story, single family home to office; o Construction of a 3,283 sq. ft. office addition on the front façade (west) of the extant historic building; o Demolition of a 372 sq. ft. contributing outbuilding (garage) in order to accommodate the construction of a new 1,090 sq. ft. detached office building; o Construction of a twenty-five (25) space asphalt parking lot including one handicapped accessible space and five compact spaces; Meeting Date:June 4, 2003 Agenda Item: III.A. 4 HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 2 o Installation of a brick sidewalk, fountain, associated landscaping, and refuse container area; and, o Waiver requests to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)©(1) for the reduction of the stacking distance and LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) to reduce the required landscape strip on the northern property line of the parking area from 5' to 3'. SITE- P ..AN'' ANALY.SIS . , COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The following table indicates that the development proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the RO zoning district: Required Provided Building Height(max.) 35' 23' (median of tower roof) Building Setbacks (min.) - Front.(southwest 25' 25' and northwest) Side Interior(east) 15' 15' Side Street (west) 25' 35' Open Space 25% 45.4% Parking Requirement Pursuant to LDR 4.4.17(G)(2) parking for business and professional offices shall be at the standard of one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of total floor area. A 25 space, double bay parking lot, including one handicapped space and five compact spaces, is proposed at the southeast side of the property with access taken off of NE 5th Terrace. The existing building coupled with the new construction will contain a total of 5,526 sq. ft. Based on the proposed square footage, 18.42 or 19 parking spaces are required. Thus, the parking requirement has been met. An existing driveway lies to the north of the property fronting Dixie Boulevard. As the parking will be accommodated at the rear of the property, it is recommended that the driveway be removed as a vehicle utilizing the space will block access to the sidewalk. Since there is more than adequate parking to the rear, the space is unnecessary to meet the required parking and is not necessary to maintain the residential character based on HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 3 the development proposal. Removal of the driveway has been added as a condition of approval. Stacking Distance • Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), the minimum required stacking distance between a right-of-way and the first parking space or aisleway in a parking lot providing between 21-50 spaces is 20' for a local street. The applicant has proposed to reduce the required stacking distance to 10' on the west driveway and 5' at the east driveway in order to accommodate the proposed 25 spaces. Waiver Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation;and, d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Waiver Analysis In order to accommodate the 20' of stacking, three or more parking spaces will need to be eliminated. Due to the unusual configuration of the lot and the provision of two driveways, the reduction is appropriate. Granting the waiver will not negatively impact the surrounding properties as the use, time, and days of operation by the business are limited with respect to conflicts with the surrounding residential/commercial area. Further, reduction of the stacking distance and construction of the parking lot will neither diminish the provision of public facilities in the area nor create an unsafe situation. Based on this analysis, it is reasonable to believe that a waiver would be granted in a similar circumstance for another applicant or property. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Bike Rack Though the property is outside of the City's TCEA (Transportation Concurrency Exception Area), the applicant has provided a bike rack to be located to the east of the extant historic building. Site Lighting Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting is required on site for new development proposals. A photometric plan has been submitted to meet this requirement as outlined in LDR Section 4.6.8. Further, site lighting locations are reflected on the site, landscape, and engineering plans and decorative fixture details were provided. The poles will spun concrete 16' in height with gooseneck mounting and a fixture height of 13'. Based on the HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 4 photometric plan provided, the illumination levels exceed those allowed in neighborhood developments. Also, sharp cutoff luminaire must be used. As the property abuts residences, the photometric plan should take into account the spillage onto the adjacent properties. A condition of approval that the site lighting and photometric plan is revised to comply with standards as stated above has been attached. Underground Utilities Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.8, utility facilities serving the development shall be located underground throughout the development. The site plan indicates that the existing overhead utility lines will be buried. Sidewalks Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5'wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-way adjacent to the property. An existing 5' sidewalk currently runs along both Dixie Boulevard and NE 5th Terrace providing accessibility to the buildings. Refuse Container Area The proposed refuse area is located at the southeast corner of the parking area and angled for access from the parking lot. The 11'4"x10' refuse area, including recyclables, will be placed on a concrete pad and screened by a 6' high, concrete block wall with a pair of metal gates at the front and a 3' access door to the side. The wall will be painted to match the buildings. While the minimum requirements have been met for the refuse container, the location of the refuse container is not appropriate adjacent to the front yard of the abutting residence, along a residential street, and where it encroaches into the site visibility triangle. The container should be relocated to the interior of the parking area in order to be properly screened from the right-of-way and to provide better access and not abut a residential property. Further, there is no notation of the wall material and gate detail as shown on the site plan. Relocation of the refuse container and notations providing information regarding the wall material and gate detail have been added as conditions of approval. Notation of the color palette has been added as a condition of approval. Declaration of Unity of Title The development proposal includes improvements across property lines (the west 25' of Lot 14 and all of Lots 15-17, Block 10, Del-Ida Park). As the properties will be under one ownership and function as one development, it is appropriate to combine the properties through a Declaration of Unity of Title, which must be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. The City must be a party to any dissolution of this Unity of Title. This provision has been met. Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) That site data which includes the current and proposed setbacks be provided on the site plan including the current and proposed building setbacks and open space. HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd -Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 5 2) That a detail of the refuse container be provided that includes notation of the wall material and gate detail. 3) Provide certified exfiltration trench test results. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS Both existing, relocated, and proposed landscaping will be interspersed throughout the property. Existing landscaping consists of Live Oaks, Royal Palms, Mango Trees, Poincianas, Lynchee Trees, Coral Trees, Seagrapes, Silk Floss, Fence and Passion Vine, and relocated Adonidia Palms, Coconut Palms, Frangipani, Live Oaks, and Royal Palms with Ficus hedge along the perimeter of the property. Proposed landscaping includes: Bougainvillea, Gumbo Limbos, Coconut Palms, Silver Buttonwood, Glaucous Cassia, Live Oaks, Solitaire Palms, and Montgomery Palms, Live Oaks, Plumeria and Solitaire Palms along the perimeter of the proposed parking area. A variety of underplantings will be interspersed throughout the property that include: various annuals, Dwarf Elephant Ear, Red Ginger, Mixed Bromeliads, Jamaican Caper, Cat Palms, European Fan Palms, Crotons, Hawaiian Ti Plants, Song of Jamaica, Golden Dewdrop, Thryallis, Stokes Dwarf, Pink lxora, Lakeview Jasmin Trees and Hedge, Boston Fern. Golden Shrimp Plant, Blue Plumbago, Wart Fern, Wild Coffee, Indian Hawthorn, Lade Palms, and Confederate Jasmins with Cocoplum and ficus hedging along the perimeter of the property. The proposed landscaping complies with the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16 with the exception of the reduction of the landscape strip along the north edge of the proposed parking area from five feet (5') to three feet (3'). Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscape strip of not less than 5'in width, excluding curbing, shall be located between the vehicular use area and abutting properties. A waiver to this requirement has been requested. Waiver Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: e) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; t) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; g) Shall not create an unsafe situation; and, h) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Waiver Analysis Due to the unusual configuration of the lot and the necessity to provide parking on site for the new development, the reduction of the landscape strip from 5' to 3' is appropriate. Further, the required amount of landscaping can be installed within the proposed reduced landscape strip. Granting the waiver will not negatively impact the surrounding properties HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 6 and reduction of the landscape strip will neither strain public facilities in the area nor create an unsafe situation. Based on this analysis, it is reasonable to believe that a waiver would be granted in a similar circumstance for another applicant or property. Landscape Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1)That all landscaping at the northeast corner of the property adjacent to the extant historic building be identified. 2)That the existing Ficus hedge and proposed Ixora in front of the addition (facing Dixie Boulevard) be eliminated and that foundation plantings be incorporated in place of the hedge in order to expand the view from the right-of-way. DESIGN ELEMENTS/ANALYSIS.: Residential Conversion to Commercial Existing The proposal involves the conversion of a contributing, one-story residential building to office. The Mission Revival building is approximately 1,153 sq. ft. and lies on the northeast corner of the property. The one-story, flat roof, frame dwelling displays original detailing such as wood frame windows (with the exception of the west elevation), textured stucco exterior, and stepped parapet. The building will be rehabilitated based on its original vernacular footprint and a 3,283 sq. ft. addition will be constructed to the west. The project also includes the demolition of the contributing garage and the construction of a 1,090 sq. ft. building for separate office use. No elevation changes are proposed for the historic building to accommodate the conversion. Addition & New Construction The proposed project also includes the construction of a 3,283 sq. ft. addition to the 1,153 sq. ft. single family home and the construction of a new 1,090 sq. ft. separate office building. The one-story, 3,283 sq. ft. addition is proposed to the southwest of the existing historic building. The buildings are attached at the west elevation of the extant dwelling with the new footprint expanding westward along Dixie Boulevard. Complying with the required setback of 25' on both Dixie Boulevard and NE 5th Terrace, the footprint is stepped back along NE 5th Terrace in order to accommodate the angled property line. The new concrete block addition will incorporate a series of styles including Mission Revival, Mediterranean- Revival, and Moorish influences. The addition displays a textured stucco exterior and multi- plane, barrel tile roof that incorporate hips, gables, pent roofs, and a hexagonal roof design. The flat roof and decorative parapet found on the original building is also mimicked in the design of the first bay of the addition. Fenestration includes the use of 4/1 and ocular aluminum frame windows and divided light entry doors. Decorative elements include the use of louvered vents, columns, decorative banding, cast stone moldings, canvas awnings, scuppers, pendants, and a wood trellis. HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 7 The addition's floor plan will incorporate new office space, meeting rooms, a kitchenette, and a formal tower style entryway with hexagonal roof providing access from the northwest corner of the proposed courtyard (rear of the contributing building). The one-story, 1,090 sq. ft., concrete block building will be located to the rear and east of the extant historic building, independent of either the extant dwelling or the addition. The building will be flanked by Chicago brick walkways and a courtyard with fountain, planters, and retaining wall to the west and will meet the required side setback of 15'. The building continues the design of the new addition with its stucco exterior, canvas awnings, and barrel tile hip roof. Fenestration includes 4/1 aluminum frame windows and wood French doors. A window detail for the addition and the new building has not been provided and has therefore been added as a condition of approval. A series of canvas awnings are also proposed for the addition and new building, however no detail or color sample of the awnings have been submitted to date. Submission of an awning detail and proposed color(s) should be provided at the Board's meeting and has been attached as a condition of approval. As no color palette for the buildings has been proposed at this time, this should also be provided at the meeting and has been added as a condition of approval. Site Improvements A Chicago brick walkway and courtyard with fountain, planters, and retaining wall are proposed to the rear of the extant building and in between the proposed addition and new office building. The proposed fountain must be limited in depth to no more than 24" (2'). A detail of the proposed fountain, planters, and retaining wall have not been submitted and have been attached as conditions of approval. LDR Section 4.5.1(E) Design Elements Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating alterations or additions of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non- contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 8 shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8)All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in (a) height, (b) front faced proportion, (c) proportion of openings, (d) rhythm of solids to voids, (e) rhythm of buildings on streets, (t) rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections, (g)relation to materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district, (h) roof shapes, (i) walls of continuity, (I) scale of a building, and (k) directional expression of the front elevation. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: 1) A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2) The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 3) Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. 4) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Analysis The proposed elevations for the addition are a complex mix of styles and design. The elevations should be simplified to develop a cohesive design which compliments the existing Mission style dwelling. For instance, simplifying the roof lines to one or two styles and limiting the reproduction of the same style of parapet found on the original dwelling. A new more intricate curvilinear or stepped Mission style parapet would differentiate the new from the extant while still complimenting the original. Further, the styles proposed envelop the existing Mission-Revival style building and are so varied that the addition does not appear to be a sensitive addition. It is recommended that the building represent an addition which compliments the minimal detailing on the original building while differentiating itself. Mixing three to four styles of architecture is inappropriate in the surrounding district and careful consideration should be given so that a sensitive and appropriate design is HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 9 provided. Re-designing the elevations to compliment the existing building is attached as a condition of approval. The project also proposes the construction of a 1,090 sq. ft. separate building for use as additional office space. While the use is appropriate for the site, the construction of a new building which facilitates the demolition of a viable historic structure cannot be supported. A condition of approval has been added which supports the retention of the garage and the incorporation of the structure into the new site plan. A more detailed analysis of the demolition request follows. DEMOLITION FINDINGS, Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), The HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing in the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: 1) Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. 2) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 10 Demolition (garage) In association with the property improvements, the applicant is requesting the demolition of a contributing 372 sq. ft. garage (20.4' x 18.25'), which is centered behind (south of) the extant historic building. The garage mimics the Mission-Revival style of the main dwelling with its wood frame, textured stucco exterior, and fenestration. Constructed in 1930, the garage is considered a contributing structure. Analysis Though inspection of the structure and notation from the applicant's engineer documents wood rot, water infiltration, and fungus, there has been no documentation provided that does not support the in-kind replacement of any deteriorated members or that the structure is unsound and cannot be rehabilitated. The structure in situ has retained its historic integrity and can be retained as a contributing structure to the main building and historic property. Construction of the additional office building can be incorporated on the property in an adjacent location separate from the garage. Demolition of the structure is at the Board's discretion. REQUIRED FINDINGS - Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Transitional (TRN) and a zoning designation of Residential Office (RO). Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.17(B)(3), within the RO zoning district and business and professional offices are listed as permitted uses. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A), Future Land Use Map Consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan,Landscape Plan, and Design Elements • Page 11 Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan was conducted and no applicable goals, objectives or policies were found. Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bounded by the Residential Office (RO) zoning district with a combination of office and residential uses. Compatibility is not a concern, as the proposed office use of the subject property is permitted on the surrounding properties. The proposal retains the existing residential character, building style, scale, and massing once the conditions have been addressed. Based on the above, the development will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent properties. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency The project proposed for Independence Title was reviewed by the CRA during its meeting on May 8, 2003. The Board recommended approval of the project provided the CRA staffs concerns are addressed regarding the architectural elevation and design elements that include: relocation of the refuse container and that the decorative tile rosette motif, cast stone eyebrow, window on the NW Entry Elevation (A1), and new cast stone parapet vents should be more simplified/redesigned or eliminated since this suggests a Moorish influence. The architecture of the new buildings should be distinct from the existing single family dwelling but should not introduce another discreet historical style and influence. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves the conversion of a one-story 1,153 sq. ft. Mission-style single family home to offices. The project also includes the construction of a one-story, 3,282 sq. ft. addition and a one-story 1,090 sq. ft. new building for office use. Parking, landscaping, and related site improvements will complete the project. The waivers to the stacking distance and landscaping can be supported, however, modifications to the proposed elevations should be made as well as modifications to the site plan. The proposal will be consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 12 Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan with changes as identified in this staff report. These changes are outlined as technical items and conditions of approval. ALTERNATIVE ACTION'S A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements, and associated waivers for 204 Dixie Boulevard, Independence Title, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements, and associated waivers for 204 Dixie Boulevard, Independence Title, based upon failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1. (E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k) with basis stated. STAFF". RECOMMENDATION - By Separate Motions: Waivers Approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1) to reduce the required stacking distance from 20' to 5', based upon positive findings with respect to the LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) to reduce the landscape strip at the north property line in the parking area from 5' to 3' excluding the 6" curbing, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Demolition Board's discretion. Site Plan Approve the COA for the Class V site plan for the mixed use development at 204 Dixie Boulevard, Independence Title, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That the photometric plan be revised to comply with LDR Section 4.6.8. HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 13 3) Relocate the dumpster to the interior center of the proposed parking area. 4) Eliminate the existing driveway to the north of the property fronting Dixie Boulevard. Landscape Plan Approve the COA for the landscape plan for 204 Dixie Boulevard, Independence Title, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16 subject tot eh following condition: 1) That revised plans are submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. Design Elements Approve the COA and associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements for the conversion of a single family home to offices at 204 Dixie Boulevard, Independence Title, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8), subject to the following conditions: 1) That a color palette/scheme be submitted. 2) That the elevations are simplified to a cohesive design which compliments the existing Mission-Revival style dwelling. 3) That a detail of the proposed fountain is submitted. 4) That a detail and color sample of the proposed awnings are submitted. 5) That a detail of the proposed windows be submitted including a muntin profile. 6) That a detail of the planters, retaining wall, and associated pilasters be submitted. Attachments: Survey, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations, Floor Plan, Engineering Report for Demolition Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 14 APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY. FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists via service lateral connections to the 8"water main along Dixie Boulevard. ❑ Sewer service exists via service lateral connections to a 8" sewer main along NE 2nd Avenue. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided via an existing fire hydrant on the corner of NE 2nmd Avenue and Dixie Boulevard and at the corner of Royal Court and NE 5th Terrace. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build- out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standards. Drainage: A preliminary drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on- site via swale areas and an exfiltration system. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. Streets and Traffic: A traffic statement was submitted indicating that the 5,526 sq. ft. office development will generate 118 Average Daily trips (ADT) onto the surrounding roadway network. There is adequate capacity to accommodate the additional trips. Thus, a positive finding can be made with respect to traffic concurrency. Schools: The subject property is located outside of the City's TCEA, however, as this project does not involve the addition of residential units, the project is exempt from School Concurrency. Parks and Recreation Facilities: Parks dedication requirements do not apply to non-residential uses. Thus, the proposal will not have an impact. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for a conversion of an 1,153 sq. ft. single family dwellings to an office and the construction of 4,373 sq. ft. of additional office space (5,526 sq. ft. total). Trash generation is based upon the worst case scenario of mixed use of office and residential. Trash generated each year by the proposed 5,526 sq.ft. office(s) will be 14.92 tons of solid waste per year (5,526 x 5.4 = 2,000 = 14.92). The trash generated by the existing single family home is 1.99 tons of solid waste per year resulting in an increase of 12.93 tons per year. The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 15 report that the established level of service standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 16 APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent X—will be met once condition of approval relating to site lighting is addressed. B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent HPB Staff Report Independence Title, 204 Dixie Blvd-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 17 F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location,without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent tP 1 -- LEGEND -- \N.W. "11TH ST. ` N.E. ` 11TH ST. INDEPENDENCE TITLE II LEVEL-CLASS V N.E. 10TH 5T. SITE PLAN APPROVAL Jo M N.E. 9TH ST. 204 DIXIE BLVD.-NORTH N.W. 9TH ST. {I MUM ' I SUBJECT AREA I a ".. ............ Li W. 8 H !A BOULEVARD aiumiliiiiiii [71,B4USH. `• SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PCNIk 12-43-46-09-29-010-0141& . _"""'. • .a 12 43 46-09-29-010-0170 N.W. 7TH ST. Lj ■< N.E. 7TH ST. ,� P�J APPROXIMATE ACREAGE:0.73 N - w, ,5� ABRIDGED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: a DEL IDA PARK SWLY 25 FT OF mag.M4.1 „ , LOT 14&LOTS 15&16 BLK 10 (TO IC DISIDA TRICT) N.W. 6TH �� 6TH ST. MEI i O HISTORIC DISTRICT) Z & _ D , ,G� DEL IDA PARK LOT 17 BLK 10 T Tisl„.„.E.. ` ..., ` _ (DEL-IDA PARKHISTORIC DISTRICT) ::`nL,-14 x- In ZONING:RO(RESIDENTIALJOFFICE) Z 0 N.E. 5TH TERR. ... M ` FLUM:TRN(TRANSITIONAL) WOOD LANE Z` , EXISTING LAND USAGE:SINGLE +� 1. - - - FAMILY RESIDENCE&VACANT U) N = WITHIN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ,,}4 N.E. 5TH CT. < ZONE:#533 p ` WITHIN CENSUS Ik6 `G., \ TRACT:#65.01 TRINITY N.E. F �TH ST. . 1 LUTHERAN PLANNING ilj W &ZONING DEPARTMENT w 4 N l.LAKE IDA RD. N.E. 4TH ST. '�` Ak POST W E CASON OFFICE - — I 1 METHODIST _ CHURCH �I Q LONG-RANGE A N DIGITAL BASE-MAPPING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ilm, ' SYSTEM La > — MAP REFERENCED LM705 _ — - MAY 2003 - 0 0— N Ln N M- ,... N.W. ' 3RD ST. N.E.Ln U) 'C It% =3RD ST. ' N.E. 3RD ST. (�% 111111111i III r 11-_ _ 1 Z 4i —i,.i Ui— i Ei - I yQ '�� .; �,` CITY z —z z I M. -tw— i< r✓ ATTORNEY . = � :Z ��.Q,. . r BUILDING O ' =1 James F. Biagi PE Consulting Engineer February 12, 2003 City of Delray Beach Building Department Delray Beach,FL Ref: Frame Garage Building Structural Evaluation For: Stathis Construction 604 Dixie Blvd. Delray Beach, FL Gentlemen: Please be advised that I have made a structural evaluation of the framed garage building at the address referred to above.This evaluation is made to determine the if the building has any useful components that could be used in refurbishing the building.I find that the stud walls and wood roof joists have extensive dry rot.The dry rot is extensive and has reduced the structural value of the members to less then 50%.The walls are 2 by 4 studs with lath and stucco.The garage door has settled out of square and can not be straightened without extensive damage to the structure. My recommendation is to demolish the structure because it is not structurally sound and will take to much to reinforce it in its present state.The slab should also be removed because it shows signs of deterioration and appears to be too small for any new structure. • This structure should be completely demolished and removed from the site. If you need clarification of any of my conclusions please call me. Sincere y, )z eed • ames F. Biagi,P.E. L 37467 1915 NE 45TH STREET, SUITE#107 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33308 PH/FAX 954 776 8004 James F. Biagi PE Consulting Engineer May 9, 2003 City of Delray Beach Building Department Delray Beach, FL Ref: Garage Structural Wood Deterioration from Dry Rot Photo Evaluation For: Independence Title Co. 604 Dixie Blvd. Delray Beach, FL Gentlemen: To further substantiate my earlier letter of evaluation of the wood frame for the garage located at the above address I hereby submit for your evaluation some photographs taken of the interior of the building.The photos depict the severity of the wood dry rot to a point they no longer have their original dimensions.The deterioration has diminished the cross section of the wood units to a point that less than half of its structural capability is in tact.The photos show dry rot to the extent some of the members have lost over 50%of their original size.Dry rot does not always show in the outside of the lumber. Some times the wood section will appear to be normal and the inside has been eaten away. Dry rot is a fungous disease in wood causing it to become brittle and in its advanced stages to crumble into powder.Most of the members that form the structural integrity of this building have severe dry rot and are not stable thereby effecting the structural irittigrity of this building.This condition would not exist today under our building codes.The present day codes require preservative treatment of wood.When untreated wood is subjected to cyclic moisture exposures,extreme humidity,and various other deteriorating conditions this fungi will become present in the wood.When this happens the wood can not be saved the only solution is demolition. Unfortunately this is the condition existing in this building. Sind ly, James F.Biagi, P.E. 37467 1915 NE 45TH STREET, SUITE#107 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33308 PW FAX 954 776 8004