HPB-09-19-01 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PUBLIC HEARING
MEETING DATE: September 19, 2001
LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
I. ROLL CALL:
The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it
was determined that a quorum was present.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott, Mike Simon,
Gloria Elliott, Rhonda Sexton, Dave Bodker
MEMBER ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Ellen Uguccioni, Diana Mund
III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS:
As the applicant for COA 464 was not present, the Board moved to COA 475.
A. COA 475 — 105 NE 7th Street: A Contributing Structure within the Del-Ida
Park Historic District, John Brooks, Project Architect, Perez Design, Inc.,
Authorized Agent
Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is to approve
the demolition of an existing garage and the design for an addition,
pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
The proposal calls for the demolition of the existing garage and its
replacement with a two-story addition that will attach and extend westward
from the existing residence. Also proposed, is the installation of a pool
with a Chicago brick deck, and a new Chicago brick driveway, and a fence
with a gate between the new addition and the west property line. Staff
recommends approval subject to the following conditions:
1. That the facing materials for the risers on the porch on the south
elevation be specified.
2. That the material height and size for the gate be specified.
The Board discussed various aspects of the proposal with the applicant.
Ms. Jamison had a concern with the overall size of the addition and that it
would be converted to a duplex. She was also concerned with parking
and stacking, as it is a problem in the neighborhood.
It was moved by Mr. Bodker, seconded by Ms. McDermott, and passed 5-
1 (Jamison dissenting) to approve COA 475 for the demolition of the
garage and an addition to the residence at 105 NE 7th Street, based upon
positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), with the following
conditions:
1. That the facing material for the risers on the porches on the south
elevation be specified.
2. That the material, height and design for the gate and fence between
the west property and the new addition be specified.
3. That the house remains a single family residence.
A. COA 464, Continuation: 1104 Nassau Street, Nassau Historic District —
Liz Bold, Owner.
Action Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of
considering a substitute material for the previously approved wood fence
on the East property line.
It was moved by Mr. Simon, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 6-0 to
approve the substitution of PVC instead of wood for the fence along the
east property line, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR
Section 4.5.1.
C. COA 483 — 44 S. Swinton Avenue: Old School Square Historic District,
Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent.
Action Before the Board: the action requested of the Board is to approve
change of roof material and change of color to structure.
Ms. Uguccioni presented the item. The applicant proposes a three-color
paint scheme. Lavender walls, deep pink for fascia, doors and window
trim, and periwinkle blue for columns and railings. The existing roof which
is covered in shingles is to be replaced with standing seam copper roof.
Adrianna Finnvold, Balfoort Finnvold Architecture, Inc., further explained
the proposal.
The Board had concerns with the color scheme for the structure, however,
they supported the copper seam roof. A discussion ensued regarding the
color schemes and the copper roofs and that they have no historical
reference. Some Board members felt that providing the same color
schemes and copper roofs is becoming a little over done and is not
historical to the area.
-2- HPB Minutes 09/19/01
It was moved by Ms. Elliott, seconded by Mr. Simon, and passed 6-0 to
approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of the roof
and associated elevation changes based upon positive findings with 4.5.1.
and passed 6-0.
It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Sexton, and passed 6-
0 to table color scheme to the next Board meeting.
At this point Mr. Bodker had to leave the meeting.
D. COA 484 — 40 S. Swinton Avenue: Old School Square Historic District,
Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent.
Adrianna Finnvold, Balfoort Finnvold Architecture, Inc., was present to
represent the project.
Action Before the Board: The action requested is to approve COA 484 to
change the roof material, replace the columns of the east porch, and
change the color for the residence, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
Ms. Uguccioni presented the item. The applicant proposes a three-color
paint scheme. Butternut beige walls, brown-orange for fascia and doors,
and eggplant for columns and railings. The existing roof which is covered
in shingles is to be replaced with standing seam copper roof.
All Board members dislike the color schemes for the structure, however
they supported the other elevation changes.
It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Mr. Simon, and passed 5-0
to approved the Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of the
roof and column changes based upon positive findings with respect to
LDR Section 4.5.1.
It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Mr. Simon, and passed 5-0
to table color scheme to the next Board meeting.
III. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS:
A. Consider making a recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board
regarding a Land Development Regulations Text Amendment to Section
2.2.6(B) "Composition and Special Qualifications" (for Members of the
Historic Preservation Board.)
Ms. Uguccioni presented the item. This amendment was initiated by the
HPB to ensure that the composition of future boards will have the qualified
-3- HPB Minutes 09/19/01
persons necessary to make well founded opinions about design and
construction matters.
The Board discussed the amendment. The Board felt there should be
three members only property in historic districts, or designated properties.
The also felt there should be two architects. Another alternative would
word it to have expertise in both construction and development.
It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Sexton, and passed 5-0 to
table the item with direction as stated.
IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Reports from Historic District Representatives
Ms. Uguccioni introduced Ms. Evelyn Dobson President of the West
Settlers Historic District.
Ms. McDermott commented on the CRA providing financial support for
structures in the West Settlers Historic District. The Board further
discussed the alternatives available, and discussed the process with
the Ms. Dobson.
B. Board Members
None
C. Staff
None
V. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:30
P.M.
The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for
September 19, 2001, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board
on June 5, 2002.
If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then
this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after
review and approval, which may involve some changes.
-4- HPB Minutes 09/19/01
y ���' AGENDA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
Meeting Date: September 19, 2001
Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting
Location: Planning & Zoning Conference Room
Time: 6:00 P.M.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any
matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for
this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such
record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not
provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS
A. COA 464: 1104 Nassau Street, Nassau Historic District. Liz Bold, Owner.
(Continued from the September 5, 2001 Meeting.)
Consider a Substitute Material for the Previously Approved Wood Fence on
the East Property Line.
B. COA 475: 105 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District. John Brooks,
Authorized Agent.
Consider the Demolition of a Garage and the Construction of an Addition to
the Residence.
C. COA 483: 44 S. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District.
Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent.
Consider a Change of Roof Material and Building Colors.
D. COA 484: 40 S. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District.
Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent.
Consider a Change of Roof Material, Building Color, and Replacement
Columns.
HPB Meeting of September 19, 2001
Page 2
III. DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS ITEMS
A. Consider Making a Recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board
Regarding an Land Development Regulations Text Amendment to Section
2.2.6(B) "Composition and Special Qualifications " (for Members of the
Historic Preservation Board).
IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Reports from Historic District Representatives
B. Board Members
C. Staff
V. ADJOURN
Ellen Uguccion
Historic/P ese ation Planner
POSTED ON: SEPTEMBER 13, 2001
HISTORIC PRESERVATION MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item: II.B. —September 19, 2001 Meeting
Project Name: COA 475, John Brooks, Project Architect, Perez Design, Inc.,
Authorized Agent
Project Location: 105 NE 7th Street, a Contributing Structure within the Del-Ida
Park Historic District
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The action requested of the Board is to approve COA 475 for the demolition of an
existing garage and the design for an addition, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
BACKGROUND
The residence at 105 NE 7th Street was constructed in 1941 and is considered a
"contributing" structure within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The subject property is
located on the north side of NE 7th Street, between North Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd
Avenue, and is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). Over the years a number of
alterations have occurred the most obvious is the enclosure of the front porch with a
series of jalousie windows.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The property consists of two lots with a total frontage (width) of 100' and a depth of
120'. Presently the lots contain the two bedroom / two bathroom house, as well as a
detached one story garage at the northwest corner of the property. The proposal calls
for the demolition of the existing garage, and its replacement with a two-story addition
that will attach and extend westward from the existing residence. Also proposed is the
installation of a pool with a Chicago brick deck, and a new Chicago brick driveway, and
a fence with a gate between the new addition and the west property line.
The existing floor area of the residence is 1,211 square feet. Following the 1,583
square foot addition, the residence will contain a total of 2,794 square feet of air-
conditioned space. The area added will more than double the size of the existing home,
and must be evaluated as to whether or not it is in harmony with the existing residence
and the neighborhood.
ANALYSIS
DEMOLITION:
Because of the considerable depth of the lot, and the siting of the existing home, there
is an opportunity to extend back (northward) and to provide a clear distinction between
the original residence and the new addition. The front (south) wall of the new addition is
actually setback 32' from the plane established by the front (south) wall of the
residence. In that regard there is a clear visual and spatial separation of the new
#t
COA 475- 105 NE 7th Street
Page 2
construction from the original. This separation in distance is made possible by the
demolition of the garage structure, which first needs to be evaluated before the addition
can be discussed.
The one car garage is a simple gabled roofed structure that is freestanding and
approached by a driveway on the west side of the lot. The garage was a part of the
original structure and features the same scalloped accent siding in the gable end. A
hastily constructed shed roof has been appended to the structure.
In order to determine the appropriateness of the garage demolition, its relationship the
to the residence must first be evaluated. When a property is examined for historic
designation, whether for the local or national register, the property is described in its
entirety. Boundaries are established using legal descriptions, and could frequently
include auxiliary structures, sometimes referred to as "outbuildings." Generally,
outbuildings are less articulated as they are functional in nature, and as a result, are of
secondary interest in developing arguments for significance. However, garages are a
part of the automobile culture, and help to define the economy and social conditions of
the period.
In this case, the relative significance of the garage to the residence must be weighed
against the development potential of the parcel. The parcel contains two lots and the
footprint of the existing residence occupies a small part of the potential development
yield. It is reasonable to conclude that owners of an historic property should expect to
utilize the land for the creation of additional amenities or improving the quality of the
livable/ usable floor area.
If the garage remains, the addition would necessarily have to be located elsewhere.
Given the layout of this single-family residence, it is more economical and less
destructive to construct the addition to the northwest corner of the residence. This
approach would only require minor modifications and be less disruptive. The plan as
designed actually creates a sense of a courtyard at the rear.
In this case, the value of the cleared land utilized for purposes of the addition which
preserves the basic character of the historic residence itself, far outweighs the relative
value of the garage as an historic resource.
LDR Section 4.5.1(F) "Restrictions on Demolitions" provides guidelines in
evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness' for demolition. The guidelines are as
follows:
(a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill
criteria for designation for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
The structure is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
(b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be
reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense.
The structure could easily and inexpensively be reproduced.
P
COA 475- 105 NE 7th Street
Page 3
(c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the
designated historic district within the city.
The structure is not one of the last remaining examples of its kind.
(d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by
providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by
developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and
heritage.
Retaining the structure would not promote the general welfare of the city as the garage
does little to develop our understanding this particular culture and heritage.
(e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed
demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of
the surrounding area.
The space freed-up by the garage will allow for an addition that will retain the
character of the existing historic home.
Based on these conclusions the staff would recommend that a Certificate of
Appropriateness for the demolition of the garage be issued with no delays imposed.
EXISTING RESIDENCE:
Main Elevation on NE 7th Street
The jalousie windows enclosing the porch will be removed and the porch reopened.
Tapered wooden columns will be introduced, and a simple vertical picket wooden railing
will be installed between the columns. The double leafed entrance will remain in its
present location that is approached by a series of stairs. The stairs will be replaced by
a series of two risers. The facing for the risers has not been specified.
Other than the replacement of the non-conforming metal awning window, the projecting
east bay will not be affected. The removal of the jalousie windows is an improvement to
the home, and although conjectural, the columns are of a design that is in keeping with
the period of the house. While the railing may appear to be out of scale with the porch, it
is at a 42" rail height, and is perceived as taller because of the extension of the main
roof that continues its slope to provide the porch cover.
Side/Rear Elevations
The two-story addition extends from the sides and rear of the house, and the connection
is accomplished by means of a one story "hyphen" that provides transition between the
one and two story sections. The connecting link contains windows and a gable end
detail that reflects the motifs of the original residence.
The addition contains a master bedroom suite on the ground floor, and a guest bedroom
and bath on the second floor. While the addition is two stories in height, the proportions
•
COA 475- 105 NE 7th Street
Page 4
are intentionally narrow. The result is that the mass represented by the new addition
does not overwhelm the existing one story house.
The detailing of the addition features a two-story porch that terminates in a gable end
with the same decorative scalloped trim. The columns and rail details repeat the detail
in the front porch of the main house.
The entrance to the new addition is emphasized by its projection out as a covered
porch. If this porch element were not located as far back on the lot as it is, the staff
would have commented that this entry was in fact overshadowing the original entry
feature, and takes on the appearance of a principal rather than subordinate structure.
i he addition does not impact the main elevation, as it is set well behind the front plane
of the house.
It is noted that this zoning district is R-1-AA (Single-Family Residential), and the addition
must be maintained as an integral part of the overall residential structure. In no case,
can it be used as a separate dwelling unit. While the entry porch is a unifying feature of
the design, it must be considered a secondary entry to the house, and interior
circulation from the addition to the original residence is required.
Site Improvements
With the elimination of the garage, the parking is now accommodated outdoors. The
parking must be within the established setbacks for the specific zoning district. The new
driveway is sixteen feet (16') wide, and can accommodate two cars parked side by side
within the required 25' setback.
Real estate markets continue to demonstrate that covered parking is a particularly
desirable amenity. The loss of the garage in this instance may potentially impact resale
value, and it is most likely that at some point a carport would be requested.
A carport erected over the proposed driveway would encroach into the side setback and
require a variance. The drive could easily be reconfigured so that the building setbacks
would be in compliance. The applicant should consider these issues at this time, as the
site will already be disturbed during the construction phase.
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION:
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), a historic site, or building, structure, site,
improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall not be altered, restored,
preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise, changed in accordance with
the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The Standards that have
particular application in this instance are:
#2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of
historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall
be avoided.
#9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy
historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated
COA 475- 105 NE 7th Street
Page 5
from the old and shall be compatible in massing size, scale, and architectural features
to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.
#10 New additions and related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner
that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and
its environment would be unimpaired.
The design for the new addition complies with the basic intent of Standards #2 and #10.
Although two stories, the addition's massing, size and scale is not disproportionate to
the historic structure. However, with regard to Standard #9, the details for the new
addition are not sufficiently distinguishable from the original construction. While this
standard is the most heavily debated, the intent is to allow the continuing history of the
building to be perceived, and not misunderstood or misrepresented as a part of the
original construction.
Distinguishing details from the original can be achieved by subtle variations in
proportions, and by the simplification of the details. For example, the scalloped trim for
the gable end could easily be modified with another pattern that would allow for its
individuality. Overall, the addition is a sensitive solution to the problem of providing
additional floor area while maintaining a significant degree of open space.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Continue with direction.
2. Approve with conditions.
3. Deny with reasons stated.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), approve COA 475
for the demolition of the garage and an addition to the residence at 105 NE 7th Street
with the following conditions:
1. That the facing material for the risers on the porches on the south, elevation be
specified.
2. That any future carport or garage comply with standard setback requirements.
3. That the detail on the new construction be simplified so as to meet the intent of
Standard # 9 of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
4. That the material, height and design for the gate and fence between the west
property and the new addition be specified.
Attachments: Survey
Photographs of Existing Conditions
Floor Plans/Elevations,Addition
Report prepared by Ellen J. Uguccioni, Historic Preservation Planner
- ---II 11 1 I I
¢ N.W. 12TH ST. I _
. / . .i
- N.E. 12TH ST.p
I.-;Pi
0
m m
N.W. 11TH SI. N.E. 11TH ST. 11
1 0
o
to z
N.E.
----- , -�--_ .-; ( I 1 I ; III I 1 I-__ !1 �T I I ! I I �Tf i -
l
o
N.E. 9TH ST. 2
N.W. 9TH ST. 41
,
-w
z
_Cr ui N.W. 8TH ST.
Q GEORGE BUSH . BOULEVARD
_Z z Limumira
G�
J W QP , ,
N.W. 7TH ST. ,• _IHij,j1I
N.E. 7TH ST. ,, 01111 - 'P ii
z v~ IL�u. > O�J a
LAKE TERR. N.W. 6TH ST. I
. Z
22 0 al �" �- N.E. 6TH ST. _ '
• [3?
�Qy I N
p ji
di
1 ill>:
WOOD LANE —ND
WN.E. 5TH CT. w110
1 ( <PLY) [ 1 0
TRINITY N.E. 5TH ST.
LUTHERAN LLI
Z I—
LAKE IDA ROAD `n
N.E. 4TH ST. ;
ju
CASON POST
METHODIST OFFICE w
CHURCH — III
vi
N I
--ommr- 105 NE 7TH STREET
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
-- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM --
MAP REF: LM555
HISTORIqPRESERUATCOIV!BOARD MEMORANDUM,STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item: II.C. — September 19, 2001 Meeting
Project Name: COA 483, Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent
Project Location: 44 S. Swinton Avenue a Contributing Structure within the Old
School Square Historic District
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The action requested of the Board is to approve COA 483 to change the roof material
and color for the residence at 44 S. Swinton Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
BACKGROUND
The property is located at the northwest corner of South Swinton Avenue and SW 1st
Street. The residence at 44 S. Swinton is a contributing building within the Old School
Square Historic District, was constructed in 1938 and is zoned OSSHAD (Old School
Square Historic Arts District). The residence is a modest frame vernacular design that
features an open porch with a single entry on the east façade. The roof is a combination
gable and hip. Some of the original double hung sash windows remain while others are
unsympathetic later replacements. Overall the building retains a significant amount of
its original fabric.
A Class V Site Plan application was received in April 2001 for the conversion of the
residence to offices, however that application was withdrawn. The current application
addresses only the change in roof material and paint color.
DESCRIPT
ION/ANALYSIS
Exterior Color
• The applicant proposes a three-color paint scheme. The walls will be lavender, the
fascia, doors and window trim a deep pink and the columns and railings a periwinkle
blue.
The colors are bold, and whimsical in both their number and selection. While not a
color scheme traditionally applied to vernacular structures, the colors are light and
similar to the color scheme applied to the buildings at the northeast corner of the block
(Rectory Park).
Roof
The existing roof is covered with shingles. The applicant proposes to replace the
shingles with a standing seam copper roof. More and more owners of vintage buildings
seem to favor the use of metal roofs, particularly for their durability. In this case, the use
of the standing seam copper roof will reflect the roof type and material that has been
selected for other recently renovated structures within this block and the block to the
south. Therefore, the staff recommends approval.
COA 483-44 S. Swinton Avenue
Page 2
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Deny with reasons stated.
2. Continue with direction.
3. Approve as presented.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1 approve COA 483 and the associated
elevation changes for 44 South Swinton Avenue.
Report written by: Ellen J. Uquccioni, Historic Preservation Planner
NEW STANDING
SEAM COPPER
ROOF
AL t 15'-0'
HEIGHT OF RIDGE Abik ,
f12'-11'
HEIGHT OF RIDGE
MIA
• TOP OF BEAM r u u u u u u u u u u u u
ill
•
IIH - ___I_
VLSI
11• t18 _ ',
F.F.
',REPLACE EXISTING DAMAGED COLUMNS
WITH NEW PT WOOD COLUMNS TAPPERED
TO MIN. 4x4.
J
PORCH RIDGE
Ab
kh f9'-10'
TOP OF BEAM _ I•• H — I•
- j.. T i- I■ 1 - ■■
— BM
, L EMIEH il 1] + —
, — MR I ± t."� REPLACE EXISTING
METAL WINDOWS
L�
▪ t25" TO MATCH
EXISTING`.41" PATH F.F. WINDOWS.WOOD
K iiiik, ±0'-0" ,
GRADE
• t 19'-6"
f TOP OF CHIMNEY
L.
R
• f 15'-0" '
LiF TOP OF RIDGE 1 y "
• TOP OF BEAM >7 „u u u u u u u u u u u u
11s
REPLACE EXISTING IIIII. 6111.1I � IM
�� LMETAL WINDOWS 1�� =i �� ==
. EXISTING WOOD =� II. ■n' ■■ U• M� IMMEINNIMINM
WINDOWS. M7� =
v Cws7r:
,..:
..
■
( ±0'-0" :: \'
GRADE
STAIRS TO REMAIN
•
�! gbh t15'-0" S;
TOP OF RIDGE
• f11'-0" 1 I i 1 I tl l
TOP OF BEAM La a a u u u a a u u u u a u a u u u u a Da vl
�..
REPLACE EXISTING I I_ ■I a.a OR
M O MATCH ETAL WINDOWS I � i��l i■•
EXISTING WOOD l' 'T • _- MgI•111 I�n
WINDOWS. .._ I 1
!I-
w�
itiit20"
9. F.F.
[ _
gilt t0'-0"
GRADE
It5/% F`-a//
by .e?.=� i X" .. — 9
•
•
• f,
•
rsstM t'.
ir
•
,uty �.r 1 p x k- of'"',',t. 0 ►"':,..
..
_ 'a•',.,aaM1',i �J,..; ' i?... ice.Y .
: d
€ • ;,�*
•
"^ ,
•
.•... e�rstw••w d ,. i"F t Tyy`,�,ram.. y.
co
-Pt.-
,
-
�, ...,,..----
��' .
HISTORIC PRESERVATION=BOARD MEMORANDUM;STAFF REPORT
Agenda Items: II.D. —September 19, 2001 Meeting
Project Name: COA 484, Michelle Balfoort, R.A., Authorized Agent
Project Location: 40 S. Swinton Avenue a Contributing Structure within the Old
School Square Historic District
ITEM3BEFORE THEBOARD
The action requested of the Board is to approve COA 484 to change the roof material,
replace the columns of the east porch, and change the color for the residence at 40 S.
Swinton Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J).
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located on the west side of South Swinton Avenue,
approximately 120 feet north of SW 1st Street. The residence at 40 S. Swinton is a
contributing building within the Old School Square Historic District, was constructed in
1926 and is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The building is
a modest, wood frame bungalow with overhanging eaves, double-hung sash windows,
and a gable roof.
A Class V Site Plan application was received in April 2001 for the conversion of the
residence to offices, however that application was withdrawn. The current application
addresses only the change in roof material, paint color and replacement columns for the
east porch.
DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS
Replacement Columns
The residence faces east onto Swinton Avenue, and contains a single-leafed entrance
door that is placed in the center of the structure. A simple shed roof that is presently
supported by decorative scrolled aluminum uprights protects the entrance. The uprights
are an alteration that are not original to the residence.
The proposal will replace the metal with a tapered wood column. Although no original
plans for the house have been located, the material and proportions of the new columns
are most appropriate to the residence, and represent an improvement to the historic
character of the home.
Roof
The existing roof is covered with shingles. The applicant proposes to replace the
shingles with a standing seam copper roof. More and more owners of vintage buildings
seem to favor the use of metal roofs, particularly for their durability. In this case, the
use of the standing seam copper roof will reflect the roof type and material that has
been selected for other recently renovated structures within this block and the block to
the south. Therefore, the staff therefore recommends approval.
COA 484-40 S. Swinton Avenue
Page 2
Exterior Color
The applicant proposes a three-color paint scheme. The walls will be a butternut beige
the fascia and doors brown-orange, and the railings and window trim an eggplant color.
The colors are bold, and whimsical in both their number and selection. While not a
color scheme traditionally applied to vernacular structures, the colors as light and similar
to the color schemes applied to the buildings at the northeast corner of the block
(Rectory Park).
!TER!AT!VE . ^T!ONS
1. Deny with reasons stated.
2. Continue with direction.
3. Approve as presented.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1 approve COA 484 and the associated
elevation changes for 40 S. Swinton Avenue.
Report written by: Ellen J. Uquccioni, Historic Preservation Planner
STANDING SEAM
COPPER ROOF I ,
t15'-10"
HEIGHT OF RIDGE l'
LY. 441r
kit t9'-10"
TOP OF BEAM —
_ = : tiff
PATHWAY SLOPED _ ..
® 1:2n
INV F.F. _________\ —
Ali t0'-0" REPLACE EXISTING COLUMN
LP GRADE W/ NEW 6x6 P.T. TAPPERED
COLUMNS (TO MIN. 4x4)
•
AL t18'-1"
TOP OF CHIMINEY ',r ti'
fir,,:
, ,
.
// w
Y PORCH RIDGES i i , } 'fj"— •ii
—_I I I I REPLACE EXISTING
"mini
— "'I :WWI.
PATH 3
ight t0'-0"
GRADE
f
�/SJ( 1 1 t �011
T `
•
i Ail, ±1 ,.
til'-0" /��
TOP OF RIDGE REPLACE EXISTING - ��
METAL WINDOW TO
MATCH EXISTING
WOOD WINDOWS. j
I I 1 Zilri.- 111I
III
f 20
"
k ,, ,
TOP OF DECK
(
TOP OF RIDGE
._ II
t9'-1 1` 1�
BOTTOM OF FASCIA - -_WOOD DECK ' ! "' - Iiti
1 I I I - l
N
Ia _ I I 1
II I
it t 1'-3`
PATH
-_______ _,
LGRADE
* ALL WINDOWS EXISTING TO REMAIN
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 4
�l it
HISTOR1C.PRESERVATI,ONBOARD„MEM,O,RANDUM;STAFF,REPORT
MEETING OF: SEPTEMBER 19, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: III A. AMENDMENT TO LDR SECTION 2.2.6(B)(2) REGARDING
SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS FOR MEMBERS SERVING ON THE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD'
The item before the Board is to recommend to the Planning and Zoning Board and the
City Commission the amendment of Section 2.2.6(B)(2) of the Land Development
Regulations (LDRs) regarding the qualification requirements for members of the Historic
Preservation Board, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(M).
Pursuant to Section 1.1.6, an amendment to the LDRs may not be made until a
recommendation is obtained from the Planning and Zoning Board.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSES
This amendment was initiated by the Historic Preservation Board to ensure that the
composition of future boards will have the qualified persons necessary to make well
founded opinions about design and construction matters. Section 2.2.6(B)(2) currently
states:
To the extent that such persons apply, the City Commission shall appoint
professional members from the disciplines of architecture, landscape
architecture, history, architectural history, licensed contractor familiar with
restoration, planning, archaeology, or other historic preservation related
disciplines such as design, urban planning, American studies, American
civilization or cultural geography. Lay persons of knowledge experience
and judgement who have an interest in historic preservation shall make up
the balance of the Board. Preference should be given to professional and
lay persons who own property within historic districts or whose property is
individually listed in the Local Register of Historic Places.
This language, although expansive in the number of allied disciplines identified for
possible appointment, does not ensure that the architecture and construction disciplines
are in fact represented. Experience has shown that the majority of decisions the Board
makes are related to the appropriateness of design and frequently involve the
evaluation of building materials and construction methods. Further, the role of the
landscape architect is also considered of extreme importance in the site plan review
process.
Therefore, to insure adequate representation by members with a discipline determined
to be critical to the conduct of the Board's business, the following language, modeled
after that qualifications statement for the Site Plan and Review and Appearance Board
is offered: (Words stricken through are being deleted, words underlined are being
added.)
a
LDR Text Amendment
Historic Preservation Board Member Qualifications
Page 2
One member of the Board shall be a registered architect in the State of
Florida; one member shall be a landscape architect or a person with
expertise in landscaping or horticulture; and a third member shall be either
a registered architect or a person with expertise in the construction
industry. To the extent that such persons apply, the City Commission shall
may appoint other professional members from the disciplines of
architecture, landscape architecture, history, architectural history, licensed
, planning, archaeology, or other historic
preservation related disciplines such as design, urban planning, American
studies, American civilization or cultural geography. Lay persons of
knowledge experience and judgement who have an interest in historic
preservation shall make up the balance of the Board. Preference should
be given to professional and lay persons who own property within historic
districts or whose property is individually listed in the Local Register of
Historic Places.
Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(M)(5), approval of an LDR amendment must be based
upon a finding that the amendment is consistent with and furthers the Goals, Objectives,
and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Housing Element, Objective A-10 of the Comprehensive Plan states:
The City shall support the conservation and rehabilitation of historically
significant housing, especially where such housing is an identifying
characteristic of a particular area.
As more and more rehabilitation work occurs, the Historic Preservation Board will
require the design expertise of the landscape, architecture and construction fields that
will be represented with the adoption of the proposed language.
RECOMMENDATION
By motion, recommend to the Planning and Zoning Board approval of the amendment
to LDR Section 2.2.6(8)(2), based upon positive findings with LDR Section 2.4.5 (M).
Report written by Ellen J. Uguccioni, Historic Preservation Planner