Loading...
HPB-01-19-00 014,19/00 WED 14:24 F C�002 MANLMAL LAND COMPANY 800 N.w.62ND STREET,SUITE 200 FORT LAUDF.RDAI.E,FL 33309 (954)491-6444 January 19, 2000 • VIA ]FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION 243-7221 Michelle E. Hoyland City of Delray Beach 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach,FL 33114 RE: Cohen Office Building Class V Site Plan Application -Project Transmittal Letter Dear Ms. Hoyland: Please let this letter confirm my request today to remove the Site Plan Application from tonight's agenda and continue same. T am requesting this continuance so that my architect can meet with Planning and Zoning Staff and adjust our plans to accommodate your recommendations. I met with Mr.Stofft briefly today and he agrees with the idcas that we discussed today. He is looking forward to working with you. Very truly yours, M:AN17A1,LAND COMPANY Steven E. Cohen, President SEC/jr i-IISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: January 19, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: IV.A. ITEM: Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Building Elevations for Cohen Office Building, Located at the Southeast Corner of N.W. 1st Avenue and N.W. 1st Street. ' --< -- -- -- -- _ I <--_- I - h.W. 1ST ST. _� N.E. -' -_ III � e -__- 1ST ST. o EllC } 1 _ 3 L 3 3 3 3 3611 ..i c V Z Z Z i= > Z C =z: C —+I I (I II IIIII II 111 II I I 1111 I ,�: II ATLANTIC AVENUE e N c z y9 Z__- r o c E -� �-—Vag O. , , -v; ' N GENERAL DATA: Owner/Applicant Manimal Land Company Agent Randall Stofft Architects Location Southeast corner of N.W. 1st Avenue and N.W. 1st Street Property Size 0.452 Acre Future Land Use Map Other Mixed Use Current Zoning OSSHAD Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD East: OSSHAD South: OSSHAD West: CF (Community Facilities) Existing Land Use Abandoned single family house and vacant lot Proposed Land Use Demolition of the existing structure and construction of a 2-story, 9,300 sq. ft. office building with associated parking and landscaping. Water Service Existing on site. ewer Service Existing on site. i W.A. `` I,TEM ;BEFORE THE , BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of COA-343 which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Cohen Office Building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): • ❑ Class V Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; ❑ Building Elevations; and, ❑ Waiver to the following requirements: LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3) — A request to allow two parking spaces to encroach into the front yard setback by 4'6". The subject property is located on the southeast corner of NW 1st Avenue and NW 1st Street, within the OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zoning district. BA.CKG'ROUND The subject property consists of Lot 1 and 2, Block 60, Town of Linton and contains approximately 0.45 acres. City building records indicate that the existing structure on Lot 1 was constructed in 1926. It is a single story single-family home, Mission Revival in style. Lot 2 is currently vacant (in 1995 the single-family residence was demolished). On March 18, 1998, a request to demolish the contributing single-family residence was processed through the Historic Preservation Board (HPB). Plans for immediate reuse of the property were not submitted with the request for demolition. The Board continued the item with the direction that the applicant submits elevations, floor plans and a rendering of what will replace the structure, if demolished. Additionally, the Board suggested that the applicant strongly consider incorporating the historic structure into the design of the new office building. The applicant returned in June of 1998 with a rendering of the proposed office building, however the floor plans were not submitted. The Board felt that the proposed style was compatible to the neighborhood but specific details relating to the floor plan, size and layout were not commented on, as they were not presented. On February 17, 1999 the applicant returned to HPB again with another request for pre-application for the subject property. The proposal was to demolish the existing contributing Mission Revival style single family residence and construct a 9,300 sq. ft. office building with an associated parking lot. The parking lot would accommodate 21 parking spaces and 8 additional spaces were to be purchased from the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) in the adjacent lot to the south. This proposal was considerably different than the proposal presented in 1998 with respect to the style and increased size of the building. The Board felt that the building was too massive, that the size should be reduced and the design should contain more residential characteristics. Additionally, the Board felt that the longer side of the building should face NW 1st Avenue with the parking to the east rather than the south. HPB Staff Report Cohen Office Building—Site Plan and COA-343 Page 2 The request now before the Board is approval to construct a two-story 9,300 sq. ft. office building, associated parking and utilization of 9 off-site parking spaces within the CRA parking lot to the south. PROJECT DESCRIPTION, The development proposal involves the following: o Demolition of the existing contributing single family residence; o Construction of a 9,300 sq. ft. office building; o Installation of a 21 space parking lot (14 standard, 5 compact and 2 handicapped accessible) on the south side of the building; o Utilization of 9 parking spaces within the CRA parking lot to the south; o Installation of landscaping, walkways, bike rack and a refuse container area; o Installation of wall mounted light fixtures. The proposal involves the granting of a limited access easement along the north side of the property (NW 1st Street) to allow the west side of the property (NW 1st Avenue) to be used as the front of the property for setback purposes. The proposal also involves a waiver request to allow two parking spaces to encroach approximately 5' and 6' into the front yard setback (NW 1st Avenue) [Ref: LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3)]. SITE PLAN MODIFICATIsON ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The body taking final action on the site and development application/request shall specifically address items identified in the Land Development Regulations. Setbacks: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the required building setbacks for the OSSHAD zoning district are: 25' front, 7'6" side-interior, 15' side-street and 10' rear. The proposed front setback is 25', side setback is 7'6", side-street setback is 15' and the rear setback is 10'6". Thus, the proposal complies with the required setback requirements. Frontage/Limited Access Easement: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(E)(3), the front of a lot is the side with frontage on a street. For corner lots, the side having the least street frontage shall be the front for setback purposes. Notwithstanding the previous description, if a limited access easement or limited access right-of-way runs the length of the frontage on a street, then the front of the lot shall be on a frontage without such access restrictions [Ref: LDR Section 4.3.4(E)(4)]. Based upon the above, NW 1st Street is deemed the frontage. A limited access easement is being sought along the north side of the property (NW 1st Street). Thus, allowing the west side of the property (NW 1st Avenue) to be the front HPB Staff Report Cohen Office Building—Site Plan and COA-343 Page 3 and the north to be the side for setback purposes. The required front setback is 25' and the side-street setback is 15', the proposed structure will meet the setback requirements. However, two parking spaces will encroach into the front yard setback. This item is further discussed in the Front Yard Parking Section later on in the report. At the February 17, 1999 HPB meeting the Board felt that the front of the building should be oriented toward NW 1st Avenue and they also recommended that the parking be • accommodated on the east side of the property. It is noted that HPB's recommendations have not been addressed, as the proposed building is oriented towards NW 1st Street (side setback) with the parking to the south. The Design Guidelines state that maintaining the pedestrian streetscape is essential. In order to maintain the pedestrian streetscape the building must be oriented to face NW 1st Avenue. Building Height Within the OSSHAD zoning district a maximum building height of 35' is permitted and the proposed structure will have a median roof height of 26' 9'/2" (33' at the highest point). Open Space: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), 25% non-vehicular open space is required within the OSSHAD zoning district. The proposal exceeds the requirement with 29.8% open space. OSSHAD Supplemental and Special Regulations: Parking Requirements: Pursuant to Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a), within the OSSHAD zoning district, business and professional offices shall provide 1 parking space for 300 sq.ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. In addition, pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(6), when parking requirements are applied to new development or a change in use, said parking requirements may be reduced by one parking space. This reduction may only occur once. Based upon the above, the 9,300 sq. ft. new structure will require thirty (30) parking spaces (including the one-time reduction). It is also noted that within the OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zone district, when it is impossible or inappropriate to provide the required parking on-site, the parking requirement may be met by providing either off-site parking or an in-lieu parking fee of $6,000 a space to utilize City parking spaces. As only 21 spaces can be located within the boundaries of the site, the proposal includes 9 off-site parking spaces (more than 40% of the required parking). The off-site spaces were purchased from the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and are located within the parking lot immediately to the south of the subject property. A unity-of-title must be provided for the 9 off-site parking spaces, this item has been attached as a condition of approval. The 9 off-site parking spaces and the 21 on-site spaces meet the parking requirement. HPB Staff Report Cohen Office Building—Site Plan and COA-343 Page 4 Front Yard Parking: WAIVER ANALYSIS: Pursuant to Section 4.4.24(G)(3) (Front Yard Parking), all parking, except for single- family homes and duplexes, shall be located in the side or rear yard or adjacent to a • rear alley. No such parking shall be located in the area between the street and the building. However, where there are existing buildings, the Historic Preservation Board may waive this requirement during the site plan review process, provided that it is determined that compliance is not feasible and that the residential character of the area will be maintained. If approved, such parking shall be substantially screened from off- premises view by a hedge or decorative fencing. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the granting of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. The proposed parking area is to be located along the south side of the property with two of the parking spaces encroaching 5' and 6' into the front yard setback. A two-foot (2') high Cocoplum hedge is proposed adjacent to said parking spaces. As previously stated, HPB felt that the front of the building should be oriented toward NW 1st Avenue and recommended that the parking be accommodated on the east side of the property [Ref: February 17, 1999 HPB meeting minutes]. The proposal indicates that the existing single-family structure is to be demolished and a 9,300 sq. ft. office building is to be constructed with the front facing NW 1st Street and the parking area on the south. As the code states, "where there are existing buildings, HPB may waive this requirement" however, the existing contributing single-family residence is proposed to be demolished. Thus, the waiver request does not meet the intent of the code. Additionally, the request for a limited access easement is further compromising the code. Alternative parking lot designs to accommodate parking outside of the setback area are feasible and compliance is feasible with alternate site plan layouts. Granting the waiver will result in a special privilege, as the same request would not be granted under similar circumstances. Based upon the above, it is not appropriate to grant a waiver to allow parking in the front yard setback. HPB Staff Report Cohen Office Building—Site Plan and COA-343 Page 5 Unity of Title As the property incorporates 2 platted lots with improvements across lot lines and 9 parking spaces within the CRA lot to the south, a recorded Unity of Title must be provided, which has been listed as a condition of approval. Bike Rack: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided by a fixed or stationary bike rack for any non-residential use within the City's TCEA. The subject property is located within the TCEA area, and a bike rack has been provided. Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), lighting is required for new development proposals. The site plan indicates wall mounted carriage lights are to be provided on the structure. However, additional lighting may be required. A site lighting and photometrics plan must be provided to ensure compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8 and is attached as a condition of approval. Sidewalks: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of- way adjacent to the property. A 5' sidewalk currently exists within the NW 1st Street right-of-way adjacent to the north side of the property. A 5' sidewalk is proposed along the west (NW 1st Avenue) side of the property. As the proposed sidewalk is located within the property boundary, a sidewalk easement agreement will need to be executed. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. In addition, the proposal includes pedestrian connections to the existing and proposed sidewalks along NW 1st Street and Avenue. LANDSCAPE PLAN ANALYSIS As a Cocoplum hedge, one Royal Poinciana tree and four Gumbo Limbo trees exist on the property immediately to the south the provisions for perimeter landscape requirements relating to abutting properties shall not be applicable where a proposed parking area abuts an existing hedge or established tree line [Ref: LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(f)]. However, in the event that the landscaping provided by the adjacent property which has been used to satisfy the landscaping requirements for the property making application is ever removed, the property heretofore using the existing vegetation to satisfy landscaping requirements, must then install landscaping as required to comply with the provisions of the code. This note must appear on the landscape plan; this item has been attached as a condition of approval. An existing large Ficus Tree and Sabal Palm tree along the western and southern property lines will be retained and incorporated into the proposed landscaping. The landscaping proposed within the parking area include 4 Pigeon Plum trees, 3 Crape Myrtle trees, 1 Gumbo Limbo, Cocoplum hedging, and underplantings consisting of HPB Staff Report Cohen Office Building—Site Plan and COA-343 Page 6 Indian Hawthorn, Variegated Ginger, Parson's Juniper, Giant Liriope, Variegated Pittosporum and Katie Lily. The landscaping surrounding the structure include groupings of Foxtail Palms with Spider Lily underplantings and Dwarf Yaupon hedging; Alexander Palms with Variegated Pittosporum and Annual underplantings; and, Purple Crinum Lilies with • Parson's Juniper and Katie underplantings. The four entrances at the corners of the building will be flanked with Indian Hawthorns and underplantings consisting of Parson's Juniper and Katie. DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS The development proposal includes the following design elements, which require analysis with respect to compatibility with the surrounding area. The proposed building is to be constructed of c.b.s. with a smooth stucco finish. The second floor of the proposed structure will be painted sage green and the first floor is to be painted, crème. Aluminum bahama shutters are proposed for the windows on the first floor and fixed aluminum decorative shutters are proposed for the second floor windows. The shutters are to be painted forest green. All windows are proposed to be casement windows with decorative stucco window sills on the first floor windows and lintels on the second floor windows. The roof will be white concrete tile with rafter tails below the fascia line on all sides of the structure. The proposed office building will Contemporary Florida Vernacular in style. Given the scale and massing of the proposed structure, staff has concerns with the ability of the project to comply with the Historic Preservation Development Standards (LDR Section 4.5.1) and LDR guidelines regarding compatibility and appropriateness as follows: Scale of a Building: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(j), the size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings and structures within a historic district. With HPB reviewing the project as a pre-application item in February of 1999, and making a recommendation that the building should be scaled back in size and re- oriented towards the west, specifically demonstrate that the size is not compatible with other structures and sites within the historic district. Additionally, 9 off-site parking spaces are necessary to meet the parking requirement for the 9,300 square foot structure. On-site parking cannot be accommodated due to the size (9,300 sq. ft.). Directional Expression of Front Elevation: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(k), a building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures and sites in its directional character, whether vertical, horizontal, or nondirectional. HPB Staff Report Cohen Office Building—Site Plan and COA-343 Page 7 The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state that it is appropriate for new construction to have consistent proportions. Primary facades must be oriented streetside in a manner that will maintain the existing streetscape. Visual consistency at the street level as well as utilizing a stair step façade line on the upper floors can harmonize with the existing single and two story structures. The proposed office building appears to be out of scale • with surrounding structures and is overly massive for its site on the corner of NW 1st Avenue and NW 1st Street. The primary façade is oriented to the proposed parking lot and is not oriented to maintain the streetscape of NW 1st Avenue. If the Board agrees with staffs assessment, direction should be given to the applicant to reduce the overall square footage of the addition, re-orient the structure so that the front faces west with the parking on the east and that the structure should contain more residential characteristics. Refuse Containers: The proposal includes the installation of a trash/refuse container area on the east side of the parking area adjacent to the 6' x 24' maneuvering area. The plans indicate that the 42" x 78" roll-out dumpster will be enclosed by a 5' high stuccoed c.b.s. wall with a wooden gate on the front. Additionally, a Cocoplum hedge (24" high) will be planted on the east and south sides. This hedge must be maintained at a height of 5' once mature. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of OMU (Other Mixed Use) and a zoning designation of OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(B)(2), within the OSSHAD zoning district, Business and Professional offices are listed as a permitted use. Thus, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to the Future Land Use Map. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. HPB Staff Report Cohen Office Building—Site Plan and COA-343 Page 8 Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: • As described under the Site Plan Modification Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDR's cannot fully be made. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan was conducted and no applicable goals, objectives or policies were found. Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bordered on the north, south, and east by the OSSHAD zoning district and CF (Community Facilities) to the west. To the north are medical offices; south is the CRA parking lot; east is Damiano's Restaurant and a single-family residence; and west is City of Delray Beach City Hall and Community Center Complex. The use of an office within the OSSHAD zoning district is a fairly low intensity type use, however, the proposed 9,300 sq. ft. office building is not in keeping with the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(8)(a)(j) or 4.5.1(E)(8)(a)(k) with regard to building mass and compatibility with the buildings, structures and sites in its directional character. The medical offices to the north were constructed to maintain the streetscape on NW 1st Avenue. Also, newly constructed buildings in the district have maintained the streetscape with parking to the rear. Therefore, positive findings cannot be made with respect to compatibility and harmony with adjacent properties. REVIEW BY , OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of October 14, 1999 the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) recommended approval of the development proposal. Neighborhood Notice: Special Notice was provided to the Old School Square Homeowners association. Letters of objection, if any, will be presented at the HPB meeting. HPB Staff Report Cohen Office Building—Site Plan and COA-343 Page 9 ASSESSMENT AND CwONCUS'10NS, The development proposal involves the demolition of a contributing single family residence and the construction of a 9,300 sq. foot office building. As stated earlier in the report, a positive finding with regard to LDR Section 2.4.5(F)(5), 4.5.1(E)(8)(j) & (k), as well as the Delray Beach Design Guidelines cannot be made. These sections directly relate to compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties, building massing, visual compatibility with buildings, structures and sites in its directional character and finally the size and scale in relationship to existing structures. Furthermore, HPB did not support the massing, size and orientation of the structure when presented with the pre-application in February. Therefore, staff recommends that the proposal be scaled back to meet these requirements. Staffs position is that there are too many issues with the plans as proposed to take action at this time. Therefore, the recommendation is that the item be continued with direction. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve COA-343 and the associated waiver, site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Cohen Office Building, subject to following conditions: that the front yard parking be substantially screened by a hedge or decorative fencing; that the front of the building be oriented towards NW 1st Avenue with the parking in the rear (east); provide a unity-of-title combining the 9 parking spaces within the CRA parking lot, and lots 1 and 2 Block 60; provide a site lighting and photometric plan to ensure compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8; provide a sidewalk easement agreement for the proposed sidewalk on the west side (NW 1st Avenue) of the property; provide notation on the landscape plan regarding landscaping on the adjacent site which is being used to satisfy landscape requirements; submit a revised traffic statement; and that drainage calculations and exfiltration test results be submitted. 3. Deny approval of COA- and the associated site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Cohen Office Building, with basis stated. RECOMMEN.D'ED` A=CTION Continue with direction. Attachments: ❑ Appendix A ❑ Appendix B ❑ HPB Minutes from 2/17/99 ❑ Site Plan ❑ Elevations ❑ Landscape Plan AP:PE'ND1X CONCURRENC,„ FINDINGS_. Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service will be provided via a service lateral connection to the existing 8" main along the east side of NW 1st Avenue. ❑ Sewer service will be provided via a service lateral connection to an 8" main located in the north/south alleyway on the east side of the property. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided as a fire hydrant is located at the northeast corner of NW 1st Street and NW 1st Avenue approximately 50' north of the site. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to these level of service standards. Drainage: An engineering plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on-site via the installation of an exfiltration trench and associated drainage swale. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. However, drainage calculations and exfiltration test results must be submitted. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, and OSSHAD, as well as the West Atlantic Avenue corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Therefore, a traffic study is not required for concurrency purposes, however a traffic statement is necessary to keep a record of trips approved in the TCEA and for calculation of traffic impact fees. The applicant has submitted a statement, which indicates that development will generate 233 ADT. However, the project will generate 218 trips. The statement references townhouse use rather than office, information regarding the TCEA is not included and the correct calculations are not indicated. Therefore, a revised traffic statement must be provided which includes the above revisions. This has been attached as a condition of approval. Parks and Open Space: Park dedication requirements do not apply for nonresidential uses. Therefore, the proposed development will not have an impact with respect to this level of service standard. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for construction of a 9,300 sq. ft. office building. Trash generated each year by the proposed 9,300 sq.ft. office building will be 25.11 tons of solid waste per year [9,300 sq.ft. x 5.4 lbs. =50,220 lbs./2,000 = 25.11 tons]. The trash generated by the existing single- family home is 1.99 tons of solid waste per year. The increase in trash generation is 23.12 tons • per year. The trash generated by this proposal can be accommodated by existing facilities. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. -APPEND-ix B STANDARDS FOR S'ITE PLANACTIONS .N.. A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. • Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land, which is zoned for residential purposes, shall be planned in a manner, which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard • Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent The Board encourag er to for esen e . D. The Steve Cohen property at the southeast corner of NW 1st Avenue and NW1 st Street. The proposal is to demolish an existing contributing Mission Revival style single family residence and construct a 9,300 s.f. office building • with an associated parking lot. The parking lot cannot accommodate all of the required spaces and the applicant will purchase 8 spaces from the CRA lot adjacent to the south. Staff presented technical comments from the Planning staff. After discussion the Board felt that the building was too large for the lot. That the building was too massive and that the size should be reduced and the design should contain more residential characteristics. Additionally, the Board felt that the longer side of the building should face 1st Avenue with the parking to the east rather that to the south. D. ` -novation to the front façade of the building to the west of 32 East Atlantic Avenue (the old Backroom Bar). This i a revision to a pre-application review, which eliminates the/stairway to the roo' •arden restaurant. The Board liked the proposal but wants to compare i ith the plans they previously reviewed. V. DISCUSS! AND ACTION ITEM Discussion reg.. ding the agenda for the Historic reservation Board Workshop sched► ed for February 24, 1999. After discussion eac :oard member listed five items by priority for consideration on the we kshop agenda. VI. REPORTS AND COMME S: A. Reports from Historic trict Representatives None B. Board Membe None C. Staff None -3- 2/17/99 — N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. > I iJ a - > L.< a a a - i ME CITY ll ATTORNEY ; BUILDING _ I o' III N.W. 2ND ST. N.E. 2ND ST. r cri O N z - N LU D Q z - O F Z = p Q Tr " Z CITY CV HALL > . I ¢ : N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. , J Z ii:ii:iiiiiiiiii Li COMMUNITY IIIII I z z CENTER OLD w W- SCHOOL Z—SQUARE ZTENNIS STADIUMI I ATLANTIC AVENUE 111111 POLICE SOUTH II COMPLEX COUNTY COURT Z HOUSE O r w I a S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. 1 W � I v) cn o I o d a N z ix N n O ' M W N (n N N in T , , N 1 -! COHEN OFFICE BUILDING PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM071 :I 6411 NAW.O 1 0 ' °.n ` O1 Y.10 ear..l.ul DCI DO Del ;�7r' ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY(NOT PeVEP) �`r:x•.«:a. �izsmr1ftl1'"'>.t,ar .i g .1,r,: 4 4 149.40' a . - 5— 1 •..: ♦♦,,,`t'S�S,Ss,,,,*Ss,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Ss,,Ss,�ss,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Is,ss!ssi�,,i,,,J:,:,,,�:,,!�:�:�:�:, st<,i,i5t:i:f,, .�.,,,,,. ♦ ss,,,,s,,,,,,..,�.'�..... .,�..,I.,t:t:/.�i. .MDIW4K , l:i�I�I I/�/�I I I.I.//.I I././/./I.I.I 14L1 •�' •.•N�r tc" IIIKK 1lL• y1y( //'-W W11N IC#IN y 0E2 I W4LI I.IJ....1 ` i �N.11 I •• y /� J k .._� ._3`._,_Q pEl:7`pl.ry' -�E AI °n (-- Y.• I 1TPI q'ala/a ' l ���s/1- I ♦W.1.1[ . I 0 • Al ID II I LAND/G.WGAILL 9 l ..I r °'� a 1 1 �III mi iti Q I. • t . .u.r.1. N•11 N}M1 II•oI.N. m (V" I .... ► e o-..rr.a . .,I.Y.4M1 1w.r.l. U i CaVd PnIrlr r'N�•�TD I : y Iil • ia4l f j. wan. W, "- 111...n. • Lill w WA�Y�dylwd.r.•. ND M1 tlt.or NI. t'Q � F —� rqt rd..ytAtow .Ml/g M1 7W or llt• �'! J�' A ..I CFF PlaCrOtCOLDfw 1.1%3300 ea FI. B I Ili IN bodies, — W I M N✓<•IN•.r14. Y I 1 1 •�' —~ ` •• Q FOOJTMO FANtMO I MACY MN 1I0 Kin Q i r I " 1 0n o _ u iiw i e~ow'�."ri-w L MAcc. o o �((i IA 1 I .'i I I,,••• h 1 II • 1 ...0.....,1111 rl MAGY• " ~ I •:I i ' • 0 Mai CN1J A 1 RY.DIIAMD .MA4. _� QQ� In I • Q IK in . ���� 4 1n 9 J I[16AC1C i i V Q 7•1QiLAYLAY C01Mcf G.1I. NYo1rX•W CUT n.Iaa i f•1•ncilla~I•.L•t 1 F11.401.1.641 mm-Ys I v TO G4 r.. • :I � 0 1 1 ., I MILE NK H LArq•fAPliii — , -_ Ur / i 7. 44 • I X 4 II 4-4 m o I xO mr+.cr nro.w u.ar-r N lil & I..rl ��� EMI. AM Val MKl Own !AA �... :: . IDI } II1{ •7 /' kJCJ Dti1LL� i ?auux 1 1 '•ry MUD � r ilL ,--. ,: r J .� I �y I IW AItA NIN1Ot�rlcN.V�A ..A.-: ---.."''.\\ y Z i 1 • • ' iZZZ iiZZZ ZZZZZ iiZZ Z,,,Z ZZZJ. i/Z Z.Z ',AZ i�i� ZZ,ZZ �i ,�Z.Z II Z . • . '.• Q LarD;r; u D A MG ID TOW i ti` ADCONDro To MI PLAT MIMEO. Job No.j 041 149.401 K x •arrun a aaO143 IN MIMIICMO'E olwswrun' Il44e-00-0 IEAOI wain.K. I aD•m,114 No.or Ohl•. I SJTB P1....4t.1 OF N.W. 1ST AVE. • Al • • 0,01,1)1 0 1 11;'),;11111 lip g v, 3 .-..,_ Illii!ill il) 1 — --___ ----____ "---.--- --..... ---- _ cct___.r____y_. ,..i. --7'---,--1,0 ir.;•:-z..- '-2 1lUll 1., ;-'7.- '-'-' - ---- __1 MCC,.111,-CI3 CM (7) -C1 ---• -1 __ _ __ _ _ __ _ - ,,,c,,,,,. _y_..._c,^c.c._ __ — ——-- -1-- - — --— 3—or-11--Icr--or—rr., --..--- — -_-f--_----_ '-':::::::$01 :::•:---- a_ -.-._-:-,= ,_ _- -.=--_--,-_- - _ I 1 T 7 T •A z tfin 12 in >_ -1-f--i Ei—mv•oak-r.I c:::n..1 0 I i .,, 'Jill 0 a' WM,FREMIRE5 ,ii Ill.INOITIO Ifli DOOR•I I 10 NI venom row 41.-.r.... 1 i .....,.----- ..1 r. ...- 7 - — - Dattatill1r.Mr) Q r4 it P4 Cip i I I . I:•:::•:::•ri Aar 1,71_ ,-._ ,F-I--, 6 „._-_,_ -,..:4......--,...:,:„.;-, • ' - ! ... Jcb No I C-1155 1 ;11 —-Vrei •___ L_____,r No c,e,,,sts II 7:. 4 WE 1" M L.-E%.0',.4'I'I A7 . . , . 'hi11;1 i. 1 11 1 i ,;11 ill -71-- -,-'l-'.,YI:ii 1 , 11,1F,11 1011!! t 111110:1; ? ._._, .--------- .•••;" Op -.----,„.,,,,_,..,.„, ;--- ,47.7.7;:r---,,,r „ _,.,_p__., ,__. „ :__.„__i, _ „__=„:,12;,_ 7-_,- ___.;,,s(''''-"" ‘,' _ ___ ---- _ __ _ __ _ _ __ 9.,-.,•-• _ j---' _ __ i =-_- - .-_-- , iii irr 0 9'- __ , : - 7 IV - I- - -_-- i Tr. — CO - - I 1 1 r - -, ":,-. =„ . ,_._._____—-.-,I_,- _- _--_ - -,_---— -_ i---..-1 () _ CA -1•)::17:" —17---n—o—to --r-.6..."... " 1,....„.,...... -..... ,...., _ _ , ___, —11 -L..... II .- 1- -- — -i 1 ev f, _i= __ :•:::":::::,1-" :401 z - --- I---- uu-- •1_ - . _ _ Fl_=-- 1_ ]I 1 _ , 1 1 . I , , 1 •1 II 0 ii", _.[ , . —I- - I'-' , I r._-.,-_-_,_, 0 . I iii.I1 _ — - — - -,- I- I -1 -.14,Y,,T;,- III >,_ i—M\,..a..."7"I t•-1 1 0 _, 1 C) ni ... n .? ..mceeuRce mama PM al..Pal / --, ..^.0•Kg ".......... .'"...., L' '...1 f' FIS, -:-'-'4.7,r•"", I, _ ____ t ,fl • CI„......,‘ .... rs I , , L__./ U •• 54.'1:7.7,7 - ' - -"\i•'-," I'hl 1 [ '-'- • /_ _,; • ,:;.,1 7. • • • • . ' • •• ,=.-I"-, ' 17 - h-rt7r; .'dl -„ --. - - ;/___y<2,;/‘'/,'// •N < \' '<-•\ ././ z ‹,' </'• / '/\ "' /X>•--,-\ DillelEI IC?916' ,‘,',N; h\ •,,,;;;\ \ ;• '77' >\h/..` -;;,,''`;;;:'‘ :; '' ‘,/\.;;;;\ ,, ,z\s/ y ' </' / `-',::'/, / \.'/, IN A 8 • PLANTING NOTES EXISTING TREE LIST LEGEND PLANTING DETAILS ... . . ..`"". wwm. aw.s...,n ,...ues".wcmw ltll •uv PUN IE1 EOSn10 DRIES TO BC RC..OISO 1�.v'.i'•.cwv-1` .r •• 't. w•• `•T^ w•wr.,wce•u"••. ""'wii: •.w • (/I) EmST1101REES 10 PEW, .. �15� • 1` vW ••� .. �..� .... Afro„ ie' •-.w n. �'' ,.,.....-� � t...a, ... •••a"+••n•• ...,..m ... I •: i74'. O PRroo:EO Puns Cuoundcover. 6FrW. • . ,ww.wsuu.sw». . n_ .,v�w.crm u...x.wvwr.ov ,gym O PROPOSED TREES ^V =, `. n.erg-..r.a.ne.• rn ., •. Mn�. wua 4 j....,,•rr.0 w.•'... !� \� ,.re..•.• ..,, ... ...�... k .... ......w ,...o....e,. r^ti rr.a.•�:rr'. ... ..... �"..r... :e.FLZI19:}:Y .—• .. ALLEY RIGHT CF WAY(NOT PAVED/ L{... .,� 7ree7•���"r"'" ... ,.•.r.. 'Straight Trk Palm. Trunk • 9 ��s '-�A n1O .\ CODE COMPLIANCE DATA t •° y �A I�� ,al r j l f l ti x.nM fa' � \* � M, •.* :.. y `,Irk , ,qm 'Veil II / ►,,• = —.f �� ���Ato_/�i - . + g • I I . . Fhuecu(n / I F C_K�ro•WiCy /y�y� E(•Ki O.d1—' \ ................... I 9• nln.m,..,,... .. ..r. 't'EI`ii! _ ,,...,..... "" ......,..,.,. ,,... ram. E P, .".._ ,_ a I �. I i1 Ig _.. ._ Cohen office - '.- building ` kg 1j PLANT LIST deyny beech I..E«t.•stet �•, . 1 le,00. 11olF IP delreY beech!bride I Noo:1e e ''Iju ICI` ik.j.! ,e — IV\/ uM mw rm.r,••CK.11,.• Eeecocetrar ms UT ��jt, //// r� PT w'n"O.a.••'•"v^• m..K I dove bodker 'i' I} /�-�i Q R / I�°1Ik7� \•..e.e,.n..e., " n.. \�. '• h'4 '.`�u 4• °I,.°.I.n ••v. doop•rd4dr.Ipuwp M. 'f l '•,, r '•�/1 "�� • :1 I 1 r w�l i w".uu u•...la w d.:ry"iexn�u.nt 304c3 T 1°1% - e�ze.I%7041 IT., planting r 33,f' ,9gmm a;'�"fir, I i Ru plan I I =' .! ,gMpu^ xl1 ! , \ I w ry.l.r,a.a•r. 1 r.. 1 — 171 e�_—_1 �b f1 M,uor•.�I,y vroNcC nunber. j Ili i 1 1 -�;�'I�;Ch• e. � I R„ y.vui "u... n I_ e/ I 1 J z L ��. T FS I mw.by 41..••v. Io desc nt zoo•ri 1 dr ern by •Y. _1� -f-- i°':.I`mw......r I��.Via•ro.. 04 _,. .—•vr"..,...•. LIR X �•in R�t�,`i 1ea Lys>rw ..°r' o % Iti, m..w .1 PIT ��ter•p• A E cYPr fc / sooklovi V \2 OF N.W.IST AVE. ✓•a• M.w,..s •••eNORTH •meet. 1 — — — — — — — — \ — , e �--—1 1 1 or 1 um•t• 1 r s HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: January 19, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: IV.B. ITEM: Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Building Elevations Associated with the Renovation and Conversion of the Spady House into the Spady Museum, Located on the West Side of N.W. 5th Avenue, Approximately 1,000 ft. North of West Atlantic Avenue within the West Settlers Historic District. I I I I I I `�� B°�RLY DR.r1 LAKE 1 BOY SCOUT GENERAL DATA: -, %1 HUT 1 I COMMUNITY CHILD ^ CARE CENTE , ` ROAD Owner City of Delray Beach Agent Gary P. Eliopoulos I Applicant Delray Beach Community t Redevelopment Agency & EPOCH < Location West side of N.W. 5th Avenue, _ • approximately 1,000 ft. north of I I West Atlantic Avenue within the "-'"— -- 'R° S` West Settlers Historic District - =roperty Size 0.486 Acre Future Land Use Map General Commercial _ Current Zoning GC (General Commercial) — - Adjacent Zoning North: GC HI r� I pf- < I I I h East: GC N.W. 2ND ST. MARTIN LUTH=R KING JR. DR. South: GC 111 -r i — West R-1-A (Single Family — --L— — _ — Residential) — t I ..._ — — Existing Land Use Vacant 2-story single family — ,1 _ structure, with a separate one — I I I L car garage, a paved driveway N.W. 1ST I ST. and a vacant lot J Proposed Land Use Renovation and conversion of =3 3 - -z z N N 3 the existing structure into a - - Z ti FIRE museum, demolition of the = STATION garage and construction of a -- new garage, covered 1 1 NO. I III I I demonstration area with canvas ATLANTIC AV E NUE trellis, walkways, a historic I I i i l i POLICE garden, a handicap outhouse COMPLEX with associated parking and & — landscaping. Water Service Existing on site. —3— 3; "1N -ewer Service Existing on.site. - f— SW_ 1ST ST I IF-I I - _ III IV.B. • ITEM ;%BEFORE THE' .BtOA'WD The action before the Board is that of approval of COA-403 which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Spady Museum, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class V Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; ❑ Building Elevations; and, ❑ Waiver to the following requirement: LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) — A request to reduce the perimeter landscape buffer from 5' to 4.5'. The subject property is located at 170 NW 5th Avenue on the west side of NW 5th Avenue approximately 1000' north of West Atlantic Avenue, within the GC (General Commercial) zoning district and the West Settlers Historic District. BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 5, 6 and the north 26.25 feet of Lot 7, Melvin S. Burd Subdivision and contains approximately 0.33 acres. The Solomon D. Spady House is situated on the property and is designated as a historic structure [Ref: LDR Section 4.5.1(K)(13)]. City records indicate that the existing Spady House was constructed in 1926. It is a two story, stucco on wood frame construction, and is Mediterranean Revival in style. The house is quite deteriorated and is in much disrepair. The property was purchased by the City in 1997 for use as a museum. The Williams House (constructed in 1935) is located at 30 NW 3rd Avenue and is designated as a historic structure [Ref: LDR Section 4.5.1(K)(14)]. The Williams House is of the South Florida Bungalow style and is a single story wood frame structure. On October 6, 1999 HPB (Historic Preservation Board) reviewed and recommended approval of the relocation of the Williams House to the Spady House site as well as conceptual plans for the conversion of the Spady House. The request now before the Board is a three-phase site plan approval to allow the conversion of the existing two-story structure and the relocated single story structure into a museum and its offices. PRO`JEC'T D'ESCAlPT101s The development proposal involves the following: Phase I: ❑ Relocation of the 940 sq. ft. Williams House to the Spady House site; HPB Staff Report Spady Museum—Site Plan and COA-403 Page 2 o Conversion of the existing 1,770 sq. ft. Spady House (single family residence) into museum; o Installation of an exterior elevator lift on the west side of the existing Spady House; o Demolition of the existing garage; and o Installation of a new 8 space parking lot, landscaping and site lighting. Phase II: o Construction of a chicken coop and new garage (to be used as a "period" workshop); and o Conversion of the relocated Williams House into office and storage uses for the museum. Phase III: o Construction of a canvas trellis and associated walkways which will connect the Spady House Museum, the Williams House and the new demonstration area; o Installation of historic gardens (period display); o Construction of an outdoor handicap accessible restroom; and o Construction of a demonstration area with covered seating. The proposal also involves a waiver request to allow the reduction of the required 5' wide perimeter landscape buffer to 4.5" on the north side of the property adjacent to the proposed parking area [4.6.16(H)(3)(d)]. S PLAN ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The body taking final. action on the site and development application/request shall specifically address items identified in the Land Development Regulations. Setbacks: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the required building setbacks for the GC zoning district are: 10' front, 0' side-interior and 10' rear. The Spady Houses setbacks are as follows the front setback is 24', side setback is 55' and the rear setback is 60'. The Williams House setbacks will be front setback 29.5', side setback 28'3" — 31'5", and rear setback 60'. Thus the proposal complies with applicable setback requirements. HPB Staff Report Spady Museum—Site Plan and COA-403 Page 3 Building Height Within the GC zoning district a maximum building height of 48' is permitted and the Spady House has a height of 23'. Open Space: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.9(F)(2)(b), the minimum open space requirement is 10% of the site area within the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District. The proposal exceeds the requirement with 68% open space. Parking Requirements: Pursuant to Section 4.4.9(G)(1)(d), within the West Atlantic Overlay of the GC zoning district, non-residential uses other than restaurants shall provide 1 parking space for 300 sq.ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. The proposal includes 2,060 sq. ft. of museum use (including Spady House and accessory structures) and 940 sq. ft. of office/storage use (Williams House). Based upon the above, the combined 3,000 sq. ft. use area will require 10 spaces. As only 8 spaces can be located on the site, the proposal includes an off-site lease agreement with the neighboring church for 2 additional parking spaces. The lease agreement needs to be provided and this item has been attached as a condition of approval. Bike Rack: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided by a fixed or stationary bike rack for any non-residential use within the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area). The subject property is located within the TCEA area, and a bike rack has been provided. Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.8 (Lighting), lighting is required for new development proposals. A site lighting and photometrics plan has been provided to ensure compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8. Decorative acorn style, light fixtures are to be mounted on 12' high decorative poles within the parking lot. Additionally, wall mounted light fixtures are proposed at the entrances of the structures. Sidewalks: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of- way adjacent to the property. A 7.5' sidewalk with existing planters currently exists within the NW 5th Avenue right-of-way adjacent to the front of the property. In addition, the proposal includes pedestrian connections to the existing NW 5tn Avenue sidewalk. Right-of-way Dedication: Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), the required right-of-way width for NW 5th Avenue is 60' and only 40' exists. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(4) (Reduction in Width), for HPB Staff Report Spady Museum—Site Plan and COA-403 Page 4 existing streets, reductions in the required right-of-way width may be granted by the City Engineer upon a favorable recommendation from the Development Services Management Group (DSMG). As NW 5th Avenue currently contains extensive improvements from Martin Luther King Drive (NW 2nd Street) south to Atlantic Avenue (paver sidewalks, curb and gutter, and • • planters in which a variety of mature trees exist). DSMG and the City Engineer have determined that the 40' right-of-way for this section of NW 5th Avenue is acceptable. LANDSCAPE PLAN ANALYSIS The landscape plan does not retain any existing landscape material, however there is little existing on the site. Cocoplum hedging and Firebush are proposed around both the existing and the relocated structures. A Coconut Palm Tree with Beach Sunflowers planted at its base is proposed in front of the Spady House. An area is designated within the sunflower bed for a sign. Along the north side of the property adjacent to the parking area Live Oak trees and Cocoplum hedging are proposed. Along the south side of the property the proposed landscaping includes, two Mango trees, a Sapodilla tree, four Live Oak trees, three Banana trees and a Cocoplum hedge, which is also proposed along the west property line. Adjacent to the chicken coop a Wild Tamarind tree and a Fig tree are proposed. Cocoplum hedging will line the south and east sides of the proposed outhouse and four Sabal Palm trees underplanted with Beach Sunflowers will be planted to the east of the outhouse. Additionally, a living history garden exhibit is proposed on the west side of the property. Within this garden area seasonal vegetables are to be planted and harvested as part of the functions of the museum. WAIVER ANALYSIS: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscaped barrier shall be provided between the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area and abutting properties. The barrier shall be located between the common lot line and the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area in a planting strip of not less than five (5) feet in width. The request is to allow a reduction of the perimeter landscape strip from 5' to 4.5' adjacent to the north side of the parking area. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, HPB Staff Report Spady Museum—Site Plan and COA-403 Page 5 (d) Does not result in the granting of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. The waiver will only apply to the perimeter landscape strip along the north side of the parking area. A 4.5' perimeter landscape strip is proposed, rather than 5', to • accommodate a foundation planting area in addition to the 8 space parking area. The waiver request will not adversely affect the neighboring area, diminish the provision of public facilities, nor create an unsafe situation. Granting the waiver will not result in a special privilege, as the same request would be granted under similar circumstances. Based upon the above, a waiver is recommended. Landscape Technical Items: 1. The applicant shall provide sod and irrigation in the areas where the next phases will be built. This shall be done upon completion of phase one. 2. The air conditioning unit to the rear of the Spady House shall be screened from the adjacent sidewalk with a solid picket fence. 3. Provide complete landscape calculations on the landscape plan. -DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS In 1924 the Spady House and detached garage were constructed in the Mediterranean Revival style. The residence is of wood frame with a stucco finish and features an asymmetrical façade along with a Spanish style parapet roof. The modifications to the west elevation include an elevator shaft, with an exterior staircase. The staircase will have a black aluminum guardrail. The new elevator shaft will be stuccoed to match the existing finish of the building. Additionally, 6 rainwater leaders (3 on the south side, 2 on the north side and 1 on the west side) are proposed on the elevator shaft. Single hung white aluminum windows with mullions are proposed to replace all existing jalousie windows for the entire structure. However, aluminum windows are not appropriate and wood windows should be incorporated. The entire structure will be painted yellow with a different shade of yellow accenting the chimney and parapets and the exterior wood doors-are to be stained. Two decorative wall mounted light fixtures are proposed at the opening of the elevator shaft and adjacent to the front door. The 60 sq. ft. outdoor handicap restroom which is situated on the west side of the property will have a Spanish "S" tile roof, will be painted yellow to match the Spady House and includes a decorative wall mounted light fixture. The new 230 sq. ft. garage will also have a Spanish "S" tile roof, two windows on the north elevation, two wood doors on the south elevation and a single door on the east elevation. Three decorative wall mounted light fixtures are proposed for the garage. The Williams House was constructed in 1935 and is of the South Florida Bungalow style. At this time the proposed elevations for the Williams House have not provided. The applicant will return to HPB at a later date for approval of these elevations. HPB Staff Report Spady Museum—Site Plan and COA-403 Page 6 Fence: A 3'7" high, white, picket fence will be installed along the front (east side) of the property. An 18-foot wide x 8-feet high, stucco finished entrance wall is also proposed along the front of the property at the Spady House entrance. Black vinyl coated chain link fencing is proposed to line the remainder of the property. The picket fence should • continue along the north and south property lines at least 30'. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. . RE:QUIRE D FI'NDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of GC (General Commercial) and a zoning designation of GC (General Commercial). The GC zoning district is consistent with the GC Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.9(B)(4), within the GC zoning district, Museums are listed as a permitted use. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A) (Future Land Use Map Consistency). Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDR's can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan was conducted and no applicable goals, objectives or policies were found. HPB Staff Report Spady Museum—Site Plan and COA-403 Page 7 Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bordered on the north and east by the GC zoning district, on the south by CF (Community Facilities) zoning district and on the west by R-1-A (single family residential) zoning district. To the north is a single family residence; south is a parking lot associated with St. Paul's AME Church; east is the St. Paul AME Church and an apartment building; and west are single family residences. Compatibility is not a concern, as there are a multitude of existing uses along NW 5th Avenue and the surrounding properties. The proposal will further the desired economic growth of the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment area. Two historically contributing buildings will be restored and revitalized, bringing added culture to the area and the City. Furthermore, the proposal will act as a catalyst for other properties in the area to undergo redevelopment and/or restoration. Based on the above, the development will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent properties. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA): At its meeting of January 13, 1999, the CRA recommended approval of the development proposal. West Atlantic Redevelopment Coalition: At its meeting of January 12, 1999, the Coalition recommended approval of the development proposal. Downtown Development Authority (DDA): The development proposal is scheduled for the DDA meeting of January 19, 1999. If there are any concerns regarding the proposal they will be presented at the HPB meeting. Neighborhood Notice: Special Notice was provided to the West Settlers Homeowners Association and the Delray Merchants Association. Letters of objection, if any, will be presented at the HPB meeting. HPB Staff Report Spady Museum—Site Plan and COA-403 Page 8 ASSESSMENT AND GON'CLUSIONS The development proposal involves the conversion of an existing 1,770 sq. ft. single- family residence into a museum, the relocation and conversion of a 940 sq. ft. single family residence into offices/storage for the museum and construction of associated parking area. The museum proposal will be consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. The proposal allows for the adaptive reuse of a structure while retaining its historic character, which is encouraged in the CBD zoning district. ALTERNATIVE ACTION'S A. Continue with direction. B. Approve COA-403 and the associated site plan, landscape plan and architectural elevations for Spady Museum, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to conditions. C. Deny COA-403 and the associated site plan, landscape plan, and architectural elevations for Spady Museum, with basis stated. = RECOMMEN`DED ACTION ` By Separate Motions: Waivers: Approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) for Spady Museum, to reduce the required perimeter landscaped buffer along the north side of the proposed parking area from the required 5' to 4.5'. Site Plan: Approve the site plan for Spady Museum, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide lease agreement for use of two parking spaces within the neighboring church parking lot; 2. Install a fire hydrant across from Lot 8 on NW 5th Avenue; and 3. Provide drainage calculations and exfiltration test results. HPB Staff Report Spady Museum—Site Plan and COA-403 Page 9 Landscape Plan: Approve the landscape plan for Spady Museum, based on positive findings with respect to Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations, subject to the following condition: • 1. Address all Landscape Plan Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans. Design Elements: Approve the proposed elevations for Spady Museum, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.18., subject to the following condition: 1. That the picket fence be continued along the north and south property lines at least 30'. Attachments: ❑ Appendix A ❑ Appendix B ❑ Location Map ❑ Site Plan ❑ Floor Plan ❑ Elevations ❑ Landscape Plan APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY _FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application • will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists on site via a service lateral connection to a 6" main located in the NW 5th Avenue right-of-way. ❑ Sewer service exists on site via a service lateral connection to an 8" main located in the NW 5th Avenue right-of-way. ❑ A fire hydrant is located at the northeast corner of NW 5th Avenue and NW 1st Street approximately 400' south of the site. In order to meet the 300' hydrant spacing requirement, a fire hydrant must be installed across from this site on NW 5th Avenue. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to these level of service standards. Drainage: An engineering plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on-site via the installation of an exfiltration trench and associated drainage swale. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. However, drainage calculations and exfiltration test results must be submitted. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. Streets and Traffic: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.3(E)(2), a traffic statement is required for land use applications, which generate 200 or less ADT (Average Daily Trips). However, the subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD- RC, and OSSHAD, as well as the West Atlantic Avenue corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Therefore, a traffic study is not required for concurrency purposes, yet a traffic statement is necessary to keep a record of trips approved in the TCEA and for calculation of traffic impact fees. The applicant has submitted a traffic statement which indicates the 3,000 sq.ft museum and office will generate 22 ADT. Parks and Open Space: Park dedication requirements do not apply for non-residential uses. Thus, the proposed development will not have an impact with respect to this level of service standard. • Solid Waste: The proposal calls for the conversion of a single-family dwelling. Trash generated each year by the proposed 3,000 sq.ft. museum and office will be 4.19 tons of solid waste per year [museum: 2,060 sq. ft. x 1.6 lbs. = 3,296 Ibs/2,000 = 1.65 tons and office: 940 sq. ft. x 5.4 lbs. = 5,076 lbs./2,000 = 2.54 tons]. The trash generated by the single family home is 1.99 tons of solid • waste per year, thus resulting in a 2.2 ton increase in trash generation. The Solid Waste Authority has indicated that it has no objection to projects that generate less than 10 tons of solid waste per year. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. A P P,EN D.I,X .B. ; STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land, which is zoned for residential purposes, shall be planned in a manner, which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X . Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard • Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent COMMUNITY TRINITY CHILD LUTHERAN I CARE CENTER LAKE IDA ROAD .w. 4TM ST. I I CASON METHODIST CHURCH I S.D. SPADY ELEMENTARY N.W. :AD CT SCHOOL u_i Li Li Lj Li a a a a a N.W. 3RD ST. ,i _ > Li Q > Q CITY ATTORNEY _ = - o BUILDING r r r= cc N. ID G V n N.W. 2ND ST. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE _ o z N 2 i- 33 l ;III I(I I I- O) - illitiglitillilk--1 Z CITY HALL I N.W. 1ST ST. - I J 3 3 Z z z z 3 COMMUNITY Z Z Z CENTER I FIRE STATION TENNIS STADIUM AMOCO NO ] ATLANTIC AVENUE r "r d > > > > POLICE SOUTH > — a a a 1 a Imo¢ COMPLEX COUNTY < 1- I = i COURT o °' I �' HOUSE N !!! I 3 a ( 3 3 1 LAcf, I 1/1 vi vi I vi vi — N SPADY MUSEUM CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL 170 N.W. 5TH AVENUE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM310 a ES AND • ii ASSOCIATES,INC. u. Arr.odts?limos o t __ r.. —_} Huse s 11.1 X !i e y� .r I �... `C I ' 9,_____.rc I III` QENHW.NOTES. .,Tvre a "tI�..a. n. coo...AND al ontOOLII GPO..0 4 •_ '40 ,-or a � LOT a 'EyNs�d, •140 moon nc,120 Al s.A..AU C ero A re* �oTi I���1111 �i ,���i NI�miliiii �[��iiw"'p"te r., 1`,�j � ®: • o COOT,*ro "�,i�, ,e u. � ..N.0 . ....,..p.<a RENOVATION °� '° % I tlss(t wssssa ...NOD.p M"':r":".� TO THE EPOCH G r— _ j i1.INi11Ll11DI Y///////% 1: 'S. —.1 .c arco.,.cM"wr. j g _ - -- o...� �.o. SPADY HOUSE " �� �f` .'•I • L �� q..»�::� MUSEUM S e ' -_' t ...:1.:...DI `.:�APMa PHASE I p , , ! i, // ,�«. I �— Ol ' •..aiaLL,c.o., Oil TOTATR ,w, .,.e,,.r� , 1 - / N 1 �..��.r. .ter r;roa b �.. °^ ::v.e�;.:el ATIP TO AP 11.1.1110 I /j/'''//��j11. +I.I - 11- i N. l r�1.Mye1iMI.M.MAT.lfl;t p — s NOTES: i $ — • •—. I _ t Q 'Se 'b«.o-�a ADA TO Alf RP. s �' 155vv f .0 w.ercu.nw*ATM. a•' ' !— — _ _ , I `--- __I \� \ --,._..mot .. -...J1 t� swwen Hmlrte ccwln CIO .K."'if... • ilk " r- y M. �, r T Fa xAnc cn�°c�°cics rrls.l. w,m..w..ww.--�` / rear le.oc.Tlo a.e efom' ror.a rc!!aailav '�, nr m�.er f/1\, wry � � d.1 lRCM 6. 0T1MAC!lrMVTIO • TALi �\ IIR� ® —• — \ LLq K.AMi!N1hR1 moo«I! 1UM M. N N.W.5sh AVENUE MOMS?. a 116AtOU rlMrof.O� O1003 ,TM M. WO 1 .—._-_--._._-_-_-_ --L.-----._ •PGX[lES9L W._._--._--__.—.—.---__.—.-----.--_.--_ ........nr cr!"wo ra"cw nor o+lf M. ro:• 1°c°1Or '.• ..lazAr! w,.w M. un PROPOSED SITE PLAN �YKAr alie DATASITE 4I •: PLAN Q ou,uwH u'.v.r! fD2 f1QaT II 2 RmPO!!" HIM.ten. '•yY{ 1OW u I.rM�! wuu!«r. +..' w it 03.99 1y0E Al. .. AMIN • 7.14 A..o1°• II...b,..0 990118 r .u�nr .•mom.•co-.lo. A Me ;== • A.n IIIMUMa.* _11.00 0 mot/ WOPOtLOS ANO r [.! r'.a r r t 1.. r r r . r.11 4r ,:,..-4. ., ,A.riKl.aA,w. sni 0 6 "p t-nc r41 A ..tr 4 tom-RO 0 O/ U :. A380CIATE9 NC. 11 �'�'rY CJ Mdil[cb.Rurnt • s K.5„" ; [:al c_05EL i e."Ra.`"I'."�:iN.. G WALL LEGEND r C>. • •l0I. .174.1 x`r ' w� 1." & _fl ! :.I lo z°Y.�i N,r..l.",:AI. ii ~ d a O Q 4 MT MM. p O ex � .T. yty, o �A.D.r Kan WALLS DODRs AND wNOov6 ® w• ® -'" © //�� co+n..cro, To EC REMOVED. Or C,IIGId �' M `'l ' O p S 0. \ram 0 EX,TK.WALLS 10 Krum I : INnK ry• O N f•e A n• r•r . . '.I• ",.• `�} ft O vRr� Y —{ { [t T Y YV i A 6 y New e•eDNCReIe MOCK Wm",„rNN RECEPTION I I� s 0 /, II ram` ..p i.,, P WALL W'/MVCCO EXT.TO MAIM.'[MEIN" --• M-4 '` , 1 .I��I'' ., 1,,a a�R�. es ol;;;• ell' _ 0.ILA.•Ia TERTOR PARTITION 6 NALL ! 60�°�S .cTOQ[� I} O . !MR DRYWALL f EATMLOLns1 II!KR: WY DPI SIONS!VARIES, L. EL .VP to. 3�i' ! T LTC NLW MI.WO.SPILL Yr ExTERICR 0TVCCO 1\'� Olen f�o.'1 O �titiA w �..� ~—� i AHD I-F/6 METAL PRIMA AND �-I �/ I 4 IMPERIAL DON®VI VCENER PLATTER. ir3 A O O .S 0 tl (] ( I /011 Wg G O �_ `o'"'.:o''"�Tu�a::.:a OI to Ar NNRo..o.. yi \ / NEW ELEVATOR WAALL VnlnellUi0006Hll�.IK VNEW 4 D D•MU WALL PARTRKN 'i' a,�R v�wa n a r ! eo s.oR O MATCw G AieG.[[C DeTAILS[lC7 MlO. [E 1 11 .' RENOVATION f r R N, '—~' TO THE EPOCH FOR PRE-RATED RATED( r FLOOR NOTES. SPADY HOUSE NRRATE WALL A ' r ©w'NA:� ^ MUSEUM .,�. ..�.. !HR.RATED WALL � "ES.tt....r71..R'�"T�.74�"J.R.• ALL KOIIIRLD RATED WALLS IOLA NAK C L OP MC AC.OvG 2,71... N L�•� PHASE 1 O ndED LI'-ICa BEE DNE[i ADOO?OR TAPE OF cQISRVCNON /}\OI PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN r -',�.,.2—^ oa O«•- FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS ,..,. ; ,.-'• ,.."•r[_','� r-r• .r ! ❑.., ExIET'G GROINS FLOOR AREA(UNDER AIR) 960 SF. I O I AHw ` STORAGE/UNDER NEW STAIRS NE 9F. Id Yd NEW ELEVATOR 36 5F. 0."`.�" 0 TOTAL GROUND FLOOR 1034 BF. E""""` 170 NW 6R1 AVENIE o Exl9Tlrk3 SECOND FLOOR!UNDER AIR/ SI0 SF. a,�\ 0 M_ Df331AY L'EACYi,II- El yI UPPER LAl©ING(EXTERIOR) 45 9F. 4 4 O O rR� O O I riliii. t O _`�,^ .r. L; TOTAL SECOND FLOOR ass SF. �y._ w'wTn.ory.;.L1"" Dw nM.'`.L w ,,,„„.: TOTAL(RIDER AIR. I,'il0 BF. II �L.,.iLAlt_ VTAj A [N L_ OFFIG: :1 n,. ...r, Q � •.•r.PpaI'm;W^,,;9' gxHlBlT r4 `�GENERAL BULDNO NOTES • I EX �' ® / }P e CI I �- 1411!Pr ^ i II R 1!T.0 INTENT R INE AICMRCi THAT TM!WOIBC[!M CONORMANCC AlTH ALL , , a.. Nt.0.0 , • i ' 0 r •^ CT 00• rE.01 Or 1NE WLDIN!AVTALL 010 SWANS NR1601CTION OKR MSS TTle L *R,9Mtr�p ' t�iig! �"v' I1 O"' ■ >r C C1 CO»iRriICH NO oCCY•4+Y-Y.ALL CONTRACTORS WALL DO MIR WOW N k t%Nnn • II o"' •" k COPORHAVCC MN ALL VISITACLE CODES AND 0 DIMEN NS. ' O I t O O _^ tm., ..V1 RA L,l )!THE COMNACTCR!NULL ALL CCPO1110NS AND DIM[NVWN4 AT TIE AMINE Rea II {� ilk a-, ©�`^"'RPRIOR lO COtENCIND LOItt IK CONTRACTOR eHKL MACRO ALL DIYREPANCIC0 YCETKCN MP DRAWN,!N•D ES,.CorMITIO S TO III ARCNIROT PRIOR TOt[LW O �� ,® �} MMC KI WORK HALL 1A'1 !,q[X DOC rCi S A6 MDiRMCMe R N_RVIC[.ARC TIC PIKIr'[RTT 6 1N1! ^^ Oe Ct!-1 'L�b ,3 � ©� Y7—••"y.. RCMT[Cr Nm MAf NOi[[46lD OR R[PRO[nIClD VITNOIT[%PR[6lfD X (J ® {_ `__ ,, _- i •' I~\ , I'.—— Y 1p�KY llnl AMOR WRrIlI N CON[!Ni PROM 1H! 001E, 4,Do NOT ecAL[MI cn.wrnel \ • ettzsvvis_ve I. r.a r ... I C1 I 116A201 f,rYLO vCRIrT ALL DIrt NlIMl1 T 1 I -7�C[17! ♦,ALL AKA CAILWLn1tON!ARC ATROxIHN! [ �' Mom • I'E•. 4. ^ .. \/ G 1!IRAnIC•COAVC1 DEMamO+OPERATOI,ANO REMOVAL CT DEeu!TO �— I ' L� .'4--':L::�...'l PROPOSED [NNEnNPLAI Hrt0Fr E•r[WA ROADS.!TRIMS,WALRs•MO ONER a\f\ (....1 'C\I- wN��an FLOOR PLANS ADJACENT DDDY•YD OR USED rmIL1TY6 NEO DAILY O1{RAIICM. nO �Q V L O Q u D/wee...AND oi�NER'01a le MATERIK!RENLi FROM RENDS? 0RTION OPERAlCTI R,e. O fl N011.NO ATM' ,If MAD!ON THE!!DRAW.,TO SNOW BAIRN PVT TO [PEr1Ov[D.CONTRACTOR WAIL melt!IT[TO DIIEO'/IN[WAIVER OR i"TALLER ITEM!NOT 000w4 ARE TO Cr RENEWED.COORACTOR IS KRE,Y r, Q NO,IMCO TO 6TWOT TR ARDNITCOTWRAL ALAN,10 DETERMINE.10E f•I' ['•1• N•. C•f f•�' i NI4NCOTTON CONTENT.ANY Oul6,Id1!NALL!YDIRCC20 10 TE � .0IlIr^O?l CONTRACTOR CONC[rCllltl ALL I1CM 10 EE REMKD OR 10 ICEMAN. r N f r y Ne Er,T CEIERJOR:[DT� ARE f NOR10P[I 10.1011.T.ACTUAL/TIES AM LOCATIONS �O'N • 11!ALL TViCRI001NISUE!24ALL DE CLASS'A'CR CLASS D' IE Oj PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN ;r1 N NDr.oncoazz,�.L • • d GENERAL NOTES —g l LEGAL DESCRIPTION, �.,{.L M,,.,.r.i�e•:M1t r•••'M AI/AAM 4lr.t.l,im • II a U TA MAT a Tn OAK.TM,1Ma DDM et A COMPAM4 n not YL I ••••.M�NG�MN N n�MM^�yry,�V N COMMA.ILAA W 1.MAYC MAMMA A DIALOLA ALOIL n AA I.MA ACOMP K WY DMA,. COMM.1nw w NIA MA TA fiuro n mP"0.ua ueuuri rwn AA mcm.nmra ma w o An Al A T.a m N M fn IVA DAD 11A VANw t1 m ca,RAo.aMu.YwY Yl=4•M'IIIIIM•11M bean pw°••1r�i rv,ew P n"v'w l.—,i+y«ir I,.�:..n 4`' rRU U l'oM1mNtt,t DDM. , IMA4P aM1L tItO,R•LL UnTPU•nOn OFw.M1nw. Z AM TIC AMMO MD MPAO rMOITI M To AN.NalTrtn PROP U DI Arne tnY t°ea M InDMD611,f o.,tvneaii ntnwrY�aaY�1 AI IM ,I I��"'If 11111 � OMMAL 1 11)��a.a1D.Mel VA I�.awI�YY.AICO MM,.OF. awl D�T M �..yaAN D MI ,R� N iri z ^t:z n a Arne. .1 DTM1,°1:VI P�F,w:a�;t07 I �,.� n(Dorn°r ric uY�.oMmDN T0e Ye,wva lc ..-.- .. ��• ,a ad ARM•u MAMMA ., MALL xM fwA MAM,M. A AT Ara III_tI l J o d 1uam.Ian,[wLe.MaruMD.t.>.•Ma.GM.. _ is 1 • _ o ill., i� II X. rnaw n fDn,Y t t Ma nYt D,M, ,ma MODAL,.meat 00 SPADY HOUSE 5 arantrwarnr�unaD;oarygsr11118 m„Pr• 1 Ir; w'. t grtnli urIrtt,IIIr DELRAY BEACH, FL. ZONING GC IxD,tl nD AafM.,e MM.M rM e DM.D,n n 1.DF t..P1111M TO AT' I� I MAN SHEET SCHEDULE • EXISTING BDILDNGe 71 D SF. I SPACE PER 3E0 SHGC1 g .o) TA tA,n r tod•Munn eM,vaaevmwt MAw SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE TOTAL SPACES REOVIRED e DOOM n ti .I�rfoarraanaDM mat,m.n v.AMA AAA Fora TOTAL SPACES F'ROVIDlD 0 n muflm6 r�iuv°xO1°ii.�0.I°�ri�Mn,nep TMrnf.,,n reAIDO PROPOSED SITE PLAN,DETAILS,NOTES BIIDD HANDICAP SHEET ]ITE, 11.1.unwe.rmunn MU.cam,D/tot.n roe nAMt ay.D nawrnona ATOI SITE DETAILS 07CO HANDICAP SHEET TOTAL SITE RAI SF. ZEES ADM o.Dn. DLDO. ],Ulm SF. des IU�anuMlol,MD c,naturne,l or trill tuwaY tuMaMT1 RITE DETAILS(PHASE II) PARKING LOT 4pr3SD SF. ISIO. ii ,D M ucorAA•nn LOCAL Maaunt 31 U1a n AID2MOO HANDICAP SHEET LANDSCAPE 14,437.5 SF, SOM. atA..MIL AIM'MA TIrY WRVt•MOet MAMA 'rOy3: .G' AI6! RITE DETAILS(PHASE III) El.mm PHOTp•IETRC9 "1 nt InITOTAWwP Ot Dena,,ITArr AM1,OP o,Nn SITE DATA ven1 rorYMW1f al•LL Mat M Y•Dt V[nALLI t.nt xalt0. ZONING GC COMM wo rualuune rslm mnrtr,ietuT.OF A761m EXISTING FLOOR PLANE/DEMOLITION ELAO ELECTRICAL FLOOR PLANS SETBACKS CO m run Taft w uewnta TOASt TnctMt at Nwef FRONT 10'.0• 1/1 AMA 1OA MAMIATwr. io m AMNIAma m n n 11.r111t A7ID1 PROPOSED PLANS E701 ELECTRICAL CEILING PLAN AND SCHEDULE SIN!STREW T•m' y 70 �s t DTP e e D°r Mvt SIDE REAR 7 E 7REyy{ nmf•mr is wei toacvt Pn or MA txs,°n, �.AR 10-0• r11 Dp1 srlma To.awA recce m vFnU .tnurrn vna• A30O ELEVATIONS E707 ELECTRICAL PANEL,RISER AND DETAILS ALLOWABLE Hi. MMMt•nnt4.1U tiLI n•7MtOavP a n. MI rail;M�Pnc All t >�Di.tatnaWo TO w TA DYIa,n nl Pne�•w1 Mtt 9.1 n WI trnEY1 DRAIN APP.. A460 H.C.BATHROOM 4 DETAILS M.mm MECHANICAL PLAN SCHEDULE.NOTES _ • d OA)DRM.MAMA A,MICA um 1n ma..fmomoM°avaFMw=It A56m INTERIOR ELEVATIONS SPADY HOUSE AREA CALCULATIONS, _ rrnGnoao,rl.nor m P2.00 PLUMBING PLANS,RISERS EXIST WAIN Hwy!AREA GROUND FLOOR •7Mm SOFT. G MI A1L r71=01.lmDVYa 4°rom,.m�nM�tw��n I - N ASdI INTERIOR ELEVATIONS SIIDm STRUCTURAL PLANS,SECTIONS,NOTES I EXISTING SECOND FLOOR •elm SOFT. i Au IMAM Mnu.0 Dan NAu v nM-rwivnnu rwt,Wan n AAAmong MMm., a EXITING TOTAL •tlTm SOFT. x,aPmnt•nuns-Pn1,1,n aaoan•r•u o 07010 MD YnaTMnOn. A6O0 PROPOSED CEILING PLANS LI PLANTING PLAN STORAGE/UNDER NEW STAIRS • 30 SOFT. PO CUa0Y[M0#ro,e a TMnn-UP°9U,YR•rU x, MD MA ALL MA.IMAM M A AA•Iwrun MAMA NEW ELEVATOR • 'l0 SOFT. Oj MAIM.notTD IA Iluro Mu,a 1xt rvwmD.ann.n fu au,- A&0O TYPICAL DETAILS p raMont.N111A .AAAl COM Pura MU I A/10.1 T.1 Tat M IM DfO. L7 LAYOUT PLAN UPPER LANDING • 4S SOFT. 4 nl 4 oxt W MON 1Mi1.D MAMA ti°eFfMnLL AMNIA e rw•IMMO � TOTAL •'ASS SOFT. 14 QQdi ASID1 TYPICAL DETAILS I Cl'2 CIVIL SITE.IMPROVEMENT PLANS 1`' A9IDm DOOR/HARDIUARE 1 FINISH SCHEDULES 2 OF 2 PAVINGTGRADING FLANSIDRAWING DETAILS = GARAGENCRCOHOP •190 SOFT. i _ J }�T(�r'�j[y T N'7�T7� }�T H.C.BATHROOM r•m SOFT. FIRE RENSPRINKLER CTOR APPUCAIBLEDCODES TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION RUC Il IO1V OUTDOOR DEMONSTRATION AREA •e01 SOFT. 1907 STANDARD MECHANICAL CODE UNPROTECTED 8 QUALITY FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM, INC. 1997 STANDARD PLUMBING CODE FULLY SPRINEIERED = RELOCATED ONE STORY STRICTUR! •Too SOFT. R. RAUL ZORRILLA 1907 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE(NFPA-70) ���®����� AREA (Jc West WEST Bend , Florida y0 1904 FLORIDAD EA CODE �r West Palm Bench, Florl 33407 1000 LIFE SAFTY CODE(NFPA-1 Ol) TOTAL Cl'BOTH STRUCTURES •7,110 SOFT. ➢tt OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION GROUP A-2/15.000 S.F. — ,_ PIL (501) 845-1000 It FAX (501)046-0200 GROUP A-2,SMAIL ASSEMBLY 1 CONSULTING CONTRACTOR CIVIL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS MECHANICAL ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS gggg0 CASTLE FLORIDA BUILDING CORP. ENVIRO DESIGN ASSOC., INC. DAVE BOOKER AND ASSOC. PERMIT ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. T.E.C. GENERAL CONTRACTOR CIVIL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Pike Road THOIIPSON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS ELIOPOULOS &ASSOCIATES, INC. IRS N. SWINTON AVE. 'LOB PINEAPPLE GROVETIAY 75 N.E. Olh Ave,Suite GIG We[t Pelm Beech,Florida 33411 900 West Linton Blvd. Suite 200 Del GEORGE BUSH ➢LYD. Delray Beach, Florida e3444 Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Delray Beach, Florida 33403 Delray Beech.Florida 33444 205Deroy Beach, Florida 33444 a FL LIE.AA000317D 1 0 PII. (661)2� P11. (561) 274-0600 PII. (501) 270-0311 PE. (66t) 009 P11. (501) 274-0200 PIP. (501)270-00t1 FAX(661)2— FAX(561) 274-8550 FAX (561) 270-3009 FAX (501) 009 FAX (501)274-0222 FAX(501) 270-0129 ELIOPOU RELOCATE Cxlero. RELOCATE CNITT V.KIPPER u P� R L*I CR Q n••e•Tor ,lxrorw - - - PARAPET 1 �Li P L. J al ® WINDOW SCHEDULE vARce Y - [AMT.cell. NOTE: Q 4 lin Mu wnxRLEADn ALL WNDOWS,DOORS AND GLAZING PRODUCTS AND INSTALLATION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH k E � 'III i O•II1IIIt II oLLGLAZING COUNTY LOW 1OADING CODES.(ALLT WINDOWS TO BE AS OR COVAL) EELIOPOUL4OSAM sfa ir:ain iel�ot,R ALL N BELOW LO Af.E.10 BE LIFEREO VI ET!'E PCT �±� � �..' O.P[ [[1R.NI MANS OH D[TAOS to.'H[RT QUARTO, S - r_ © T T O ._ +TOrw rot noon " TDA sN L �D.0 rTo a A•to F7 ,I'•E' . LT a e� te9 CS�/9L9 Ey®�7im2.11II'R•01r.- - I NaAn.� a EAST.rARAKt Ma= [ [�� ©®__ R�'n Fr nol�R:ar•I•�E�s ASSOCIATES,INC. • — MUMMI TOT tttIE��[[��i T. t���yy���t���=7AO z-iTv os��i=Narwr �nlr•[ r'I�Efm� M .C14 Menem _,� WOKS `fs �T3�� [♦1,141.017, m I•tsg. •10M1la j fcts.M O 23 i '-- - ' [xI!@N C[rLyy D t H. A Ave u,m rym w/NTD etil a ' pH El -3°/ \,Ili! 4 11111111111 b AIN °MU E.:I�roR4Zr' T0,1 Vu�„ .,, OD.11-11-15 !! 1O. LJIJ ROAD NW �l R _�.- .1>.--•�--may -11 \ CORTRuCUR �I TWcil CL[GTCOAL a l CIVIL DRAOW,FOR tell SOUTH ELEVATION REPLACE VENTS 225' WV'.E• 6[VAT D Y. O,CAal.w.1•n RHIPIDSII KNTe. e ;Ira REPLACE ERISTI !RDttMEW/ iNID(I/,'Di f.R'Oe IDTt'DIA. KKK,CIO ROOT 011101RNlt. e SCC ALYrI.,1 VIIC ecdAN CM YENT. NEW TOPPED INO RRD IEPOR S. Y3 KDA¢D ON INTERIOR FACE O•v[Ni. .1.,TD KW tGTFTR LOCATId. My Ty�Th[�ilRd•IT M.PLLL[ P• aT,14.E I1Er£Ltµ CIOCR 20 MO - I I I I C PANT I M) I SA L E D AS Pt TO OR OL[AKD[ raR T III " .�. �j �"I,�I W PINKED AS KR141.1 PORTER PANT. �[:u�ro Rf YI pO.l Ce^E DART Y>tl i 1t' b IMRO,,,, '1g El CLEAN !LICIT TO.t - RENOVATION f TS i TO THETONNH Q OLA?CrRAILIMeI KICIL[RLtlIaTlld — SPADY HOUSEe i El ROLIVE IACru,COCC O'cORRIAoeHILL' MUSEUM weTSTre _STAINED(DOOR!, ` I-' [� Mi ow7m , PHASErAASA T ILroMM] \• ALL fiVCCO pFveRSTO KCICV[ OVCLLM]TCKL %'Lv��'ita TB:Q x0 ]1I'�O'LrCOAeE rAMr' •a•1TRr ` O Ei [ 1 ,iAIRWW 4 F �.NWRAH,YRRLeACAIYL,mraNAN�nE� 2�[.l 2 /� �n cam+, Or•,ACM.WPhT CW�)��)lri�ISluJ�lr���'+W��OI1�1c31 TxNTILLreotRwr. cFLAT ROOFORTH ELEVATION ACf ExRT r f W V v T/0 WA 57H MERE D HANVACTVRCR OAS l7 •v«.re ALLrllwn WONT! ENT nlla [N1MY BF LCH FL N.24.1 D 11COIrrcD EIlIt1CN THICK o-STYt d REe R GTE•DIA CA l a lyre T. II T I tK iR KO Vt.NHCT eC., MECHANICOLLY TTK rLAtHIM VANS O V.00 VIV A' OVAL! KOKO ON MER• E ACE tT KM. r•1 •(VOV•t CRIdlTILAMIIM TA6A DALV.uV MIN n'OKRIX AL KA"le. .� McAR anw WrumD.tl...meow,. to-[10A.H 3 wAROf E.E•.Tc¢o ,xw�F+ODOR g}, pGp SYSTEM 10 CO INSTALLED AS KR n?.!IA•U'ACtJP£R!KCONMF.rOATIONf 4�S_F�CQID RLOOR ROOr A -w• ' EXTERIOR STUCCO IIIINIIni*" 11111 F. 20 -I ill II 0 Cxl T12.1 TO C ENTIRELY NCESSNR OKR A IS TO r.ST1C[O MIEN N CRClfeIKLT CRACKLD CR CRASOIll ['HIdH ALML D IL IS TO El REMOV[D NO OR LATH OVER O !II1!•!�I \ • G 1 KTAL LATH APK/cATION, ® ... _. I • ILUO RAIL [APRT SCRATCH COAT YlH NffKRNI PREltNS 10 KET E.H HAMRA Aeo uEaL INTO LATH TROUCL A,lEP.INITIAL SOT NO SCRATCH TO Rd.GHEN eURrecE. -_-, _ `8fCP10 ELOCT! --•__ PICR[te,fEE Dn. C T.APPLY OR..COAT MFR SCRATCH[CAT HAS tET SKI NA HAK3 AID awe EE[H - - \ , / P,T W( f STRAIdwemrD TO A TRUES ACC Afi O,SIC THE CO AOPITIc1NL WATER 0 �lICOND ILOOR ROOK/ ,L[.w.tnl LEAVE RCWH 10 RECEIVE FINISH COAT, wit51/1 , ,'•S'S.DAMTNE:AA COATKVAT MO I!TO AKLKATIPI Or IMI.COAT.ArrLT iej tHN[V/RENTD['CleI]�p 116A300 IIMSH COAT ND GRIM RMIMI COAT TO A TRIF,[VEN eVRFACl,RINIDufO AS APPROv[D OY OWVER Ari lfrrnfreTEn MWELEVmi /�] ' _L Fr u STJCCo �` Lno,IICR OAT CO K ON LAMA SH to r'IAiCHL TW:•ITJ coAT neltc on[xISTMd!lotto rterAa tlncxMee,nu vra.A exro11M / {■� I I .1t,.._... PROPOSED L THREE rf,COAT,DR:(W LASSA ASKS TI KE MP COAT blIY[O TO METAL A y C I R I I ELEVATIONS� yRI lF�; LAIR TYPICAL SNOW!!![wLo ec flvENcamrl WV INCH TwGK I�IIIIII IR J Y D S.MAN,TEXTURE TO MATCH EMIf1uG rVfPoY W/EPD GII,) -•• `nu;s0 SLOOR� 0. ___ I I EAST ELEVATION N .E!CIVIL FCC BRACE[H.dEf , WEST ELEVATION 990110 O K t.t.... 17WA111. .•,„ .wI. A3.00 °". ." aK EELIOPOULOS AND m.,rr.ry ♦� ..••••.•i.p'ri"r.oW '1-- IN r r, ,/a R _�i1 \ _ : ::: I I I �1 NW 1: a : _:_I L' AV' —,.D IINl[D r I I I ` I Al• , .....-----1:trezzamr— LEL Ens swami Isi --L- ,,,:.,. • . ■ ■r• ASSOCIATES fJC. r, :■ ■ = �i3 K4TE: t,r, I ,up�.a ...I Ar eds,P1wTen •.en.c•. ,n / as..��, ,.,.. ■■ ' ■■ ,..0 Ixn[R].n[Ls•':crnca KM,'y'�q � iii....,,,.•igi N..�ta�V'''� "" /aR4yy� Eac=1•11•11 TM ... r"r.,. noTe:ovvonAc�C.m,.�.<,4I1' "•Yr•- "'w" IM�Nil/I�L�il� n a$ V rrin.°nn. •,•••• ��o.,o[v.HncnT s now cccsslW c vAaltlno . «... ` -) r..) . 1......) y alas u.. $ Icw.r<„Iw SI'KC1 tN['I,MBoI Sn.11 O['Ulu[ Ct%oR { ° '�'." '.rn..a.,.. '" , .oat.w..ot.,o. rt»,.or ii�can. 7:1: 1 �w ,u..nic..r °'r.�. 1[MR •� a�ACCESSIBLE PARKING EERIER-- °""" " 1 �c......owa. cxw.w ) re c Ybnuma ^ +s. '0.`�`eri w,o e.u..r O reW rt�v]s� f r S PTr . HANDICAP SIC rs1PARKING STALL STANDARDS TI 1gti aro,n..ma .i S.w..,w»ad o.,..., RADIUS COR ERD .+ , D/D'D10000 W/ 0'51'GONG.CAP. i TEXTURED FIW SN FOUR W/11/7 I �\ .....�,.» :_—. 1KRIL JT.REEF. ro.n,A �`..,.VA..;.�. / ';III RENOVATION 1 11111 0 ISC„ ftiE7'1Illhi ' lVL.N GROUTED TO THE EPOCH CELL AT.D'OL. 4 IDES FLAW SPADY HOUSE MUSEUM 7°® 1 � 11 �vARIED L' 1.,-,=''u' PHASE I . , -FRONT(NORTH) SIDE (EAST) REAR(SOUTH) ■[■.. . Mm "_ ALT.SIDED NM ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION FENCE I I•FRONT PERIMETER INAVCOO. ' - OATNYnG 1 L.aeun .0 loc.,o lenln wr c.r.o.w•.••.•/iv w.. 1;• ..aa O .a... ..aI,■,.^ O »" .`° CTh ENTRY WALL DETAIL DarurAcst r� C= s.n 111.0,14 4, 0:RAO Yeti AV T, D FENCE DETAIL �� no r+r, Avery 1i ,.. ,...• v .. �111 m.r ��®�, j w '��.!�� T'I...mi.lllIllu'IIRIW •y"I iRAllllWZ n . p -••fiG Ififi iA9 fi. D y �1■�LT'� i I o TYPICAL SIDEWALK .• .• s ., 4 1 relINI b„, .?.....• •,..... 1 _ Wi_ ° :�° .�; I.•'IIJIIC�'I!�111lllllll 111�911'V'�y'Jl'ICI 61.1 E = „�° . I�Illllff�lill!d116VIIliIIIU�� �Iin. ]I ---� 10 ,,..., al ululc =mau• !OW ai• ... I„•,�•••, 116AH70 l' M y s'•'• ,....,,,, �,.+.} r.• }nr} �"• ` TYPICAL. 6 a<..a... _I �1 -I- * ' SITE DETAILS on.ki.bv�.�....mm ROOF PLAN FOUNDATION FLOOR PLAN W �mb'I"""�° "" 1 r .. r.OUTHOUSE PLANS/DETAILS/SPECS. ()TYPICAL SIDEWALK DETAIL O GATE DETAIL 'Ioa e9I of t� u »M,.«, 99otte 3 mad.01 immiiiiime ELIOPOULOS AND v......•,. a NUM! umW u` ewe.w.uuMOT no oor ran.. I I � l meM�.rv.�.. & I wo ibn'r1prthi +fix y ilek ® ° aging'� ASSOCIATES.NC. II 0.1 VARY and CH•algners ."ie. \ • •A.C°.4de•ji•Iillst t,,., r.� rionin I,X•I rah v.:d.°.'",.".°w. ni.o TM d T'D'3:.'""m'°m rsV<v<.i"3TF.M 1400 a :,x •w..wwtw .» ,,,.» a rr. . * I. I 4 .rt, wmo,°.. a a. ,• nea.nwct r.. ipF L 03.11 L T 91718YIIIIIIII6'4 13113311114 .Y l G Mile ir.:w tMn 0 WALL TO ROOF DETAIL a FOUNDATION PLAN 0 ROOF FRAMING PLAN WINDOW SCHEDULE WAWA �°n »< DOOR SCHEDULE �'rn. vn 0000 rn..rt rxae o„ :rung All•I,IgM,la..NO 0..,,xt.lOLL I.MA» to, 10 Ff n LKmnWa MH , W.<• r'-e• ,;IP, «. wee< a raw CAI cast.lu,wxron,.so rn en CO.ut c .,t au»�"°:,°;:IIA.r,,..„wr.»t WI„a.n ro�ilx HARDWARE SCHEDULE »xoow trot arse(w.ro MA. s•. .1,.,.t <,.rvmt xnr "UMW ncu.x,cem,.t...W,.• nexn,n., �Iu KRIS__ ncn oc<cn,rucry COLOR r.�r. 1..A11.31.1A1x,<,,, RENOVATION ly - ® It.x. DI t,'•m t/r' Aim MA TAP V.,TA t/••AO to . Z.1 M,x,.•.x..n ,e. ♦,w nR o°a fU 'iia'rrn `,,.°C.e°ew.tean10•ors.nctm<wee, TO THE EPOCH SPADY HOUSE E MI77 MUSEUM w.r,e5•.a.". 4, »Iit„I• PHASE El r NEw I ..7%....:N.N„,...n I ' CHICKEN COUP rkaNik G •,.,.� w'' ., ,... 1 - C _ ..t {. .<�,.t Oa FOOTING DETAIL '�'-�' K�.• •,. SIDE(NORTH)ELEVATION REAR(WEST)ELEVATION - ! 4 SPECIFICATIONS: l' $LAY aooF TEE • .........n..1.00 m.., NEW @ nAVfAC,Vn[R ,CA ::'•.". . z _ NGNEEW EroRT W .M ��s§•j( e•nlnela+,te '� n i r t M GARAGE Y k IMPIPiiiinliffiq 111ARA lx.pfl n nhr0��re At rrn OLP MIT T,CII Pa. !naM.�AeruPClrb n GY••eima,lON. 111111111111111111111111111111 ' �,o ee.R��+� ��' IYARAH,<E .O YR F •.LL......4rt...• EXHIBIT L_ WALKWAY = �. r.l w.,lx I I I i / !r•11 1 "�� - t16A100 C PAM LEcIE?D 'yaw FIXTURES III, 4� 4I ...a. .. f d/' • _ '• NEW ONE • ALL TORTAcs.,o TIE nxmc. RruLER LIO.rtu» I I ..r. �O IIIIIIII Q ,,,_'•ulvamm�111 a mnumbl �� F. iI I{ill ❑ Ill 1 `R,' e°°rnc. P.l cox emE nrosa us....roan.. 96O Sr. """'""° "' SIDE(SOUTH)ELEVATION �, FRONT(EAST)ELEVATION l— �SyI Q eueRRT stanm r000Rtr R „r.necro 1.T/'es I ,1K u • ALL E,�leeo eJRf..29 TO RCCEIvf. ® •`��• `n »....s w..ne,e 99Ora Ztjj vremx.r<Irrr• $ 0 BUILDING SPECIFICATIONS O O BUILDING ELEVATIONS NEW STORAGE GARAGE FLOOR PLAN A1.02 —. n..... ..• Kw. w. • ``'' D MtAr Moat ALLY, ...t rV� / <II( ,-_..., :::ac�-r—=.±-_.x- {T��1 �r e-= .rs ,r_— —Ic---•x._ - _-- —� \;� X ` `/2z'y`/ xxx X.x�vXXXX XXXX`<`'\C�`C\C`\f,X C \%_ _5<- __ y1L\�L\ L/ 1.�L \L\ L \L , \!\L\L \C\L L L! L ! /\C / /��/ / L/\L � ",� .1� L u:ax a um ,na- .• �, \ tr _ .-_ e' . • 1 o+�c 1 ,II � -r_, / e'i ;e ••' . V r00000p00000� , , — \ / • ! ! V t , •I liras tr!•Crti[,ell/ " ' 7 •• \ C I (oougoOOOUOU� .([•• l • alr1/0 i� I_ A�4 •_• ••' •' la .•m.l D.t[bin. :"' anl,o, & Cp,2r •-\ I, "[ ;o / ,-4 UUUUOOUOUOUO :-'. rn• \I N. I 11111.11 •I allay.. v'i nyy `II 1 �y_(1/-/ , a ri1' .'11•191,41.1 1 ry 1 I =1 r1 I I I14.: . -.e _ , ' •••'•'-‘1 _ iss. , ,.,. .mill il il .'. • ••• •••• • -1' ADaL 1/ / - •\ 6 \� 0rn '�."n� Protect(1tL '3$ izsk ; uI \ � \ \ Il11D Mt IIJ •\ . , '� \1, hOU \ S. ky'q M A.W. 5th aVCnVC I\ \ I\ l a • P4Q� "f delroy beacF. florldo ,\ , ! I jt .- • Vitt \yr (11 ./) \ j 1 L,, , 44) . -k z"--=o-6-0-,,-\.!:...••.••••Id• : ::.:.:::: • I1'1_, ;' lave backer \'. r,, landscape vdrlechre/pLs rrq iv. IN _ / L1 // fir• i75 ne. meth sverve. lWte 216 - — - -_{/ L-=— _ _ �{' deFoy beech fbrtdo JJIOJ•.1.•..• •tea• 561-276-6311 __ _<,_- ,., sheet title• • , planpfi Iiangn.lI �[Flntll!'nD[UDCL4F , ti \• MF ir rI Rn,rrNn, Rpro Ject number.iHnunrarm uo anen Hill- ii;AVEFIllE 147,3417 (15LAGKhleR STREET) _ dote, 11-12-•.1 -— - - -— sonic. tie• - r_o• . • drawn by. jag revisions• A 1-12-00 A A • A A A sheet• a HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO BANKERS ROW DESIGN GUIDELINES ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approving an amendment to the Bankers Row Design Guidelines to allow the installation of aluminum windows with impact resistant glass panes. BACKGROUND The Bankers Row Design Guidelines require that new or replacement windows be made of wood. However, the Standard Building Code was revised after Hurricane Andrew to require that all new or replacement windows have hurricane rated shutters or be constructed of impact resistant glass. Wood windows with impact glass panes are prohibitively expensive and are not manufactured with true divided lights. As a result, the HPB has been approving requests to allow new and replacement windows with aluminum frames and impact glass for historic buildings outside of Bankers Row. The Board recently denied an application to allow aluminum windows on the front facade of the Silberstein office on Bankers Row (219 NE 1st Avenue), due to the requirements of the design guidelines. Mr. Silberstein appealed that decision to the City Commission, but requested a postponement of that appeal pending an assessment by HPB of this requirement. A letter was sent to all property owners in Bankers Row requesting input on this issue. Few responded, and another letter was sent inviting them to attend this meeting and give their comments with respect to the design guidelines amendment (see attached). ANALYSIS Page 77 of the Bankers Row Development Plan states: Any changes to the exterior of a structure require review and approval of the Historic Preservation Board. This is accommodated through the COA process. The design guidelines contained in Chapter III of this plan shall supersede all other historic guidelines, which may exist. Compliance with the style specific guidelines included herein, shall warrant issuance of a COA. Chapter III of the Guidelines states the following with respect to window replacement: Meeting Date: January 19, 2000 Agenda Item: IV-A HPB Staff Report Amendment to Bankers Row design guidelines Page 2 All new and replacement windows and doors, exterior wall finishes and roofing materials shall be consistent with the historic features. No existing non-compatible feature or material shall be added to or altered unless it is replaced by historically appropriate feature or material; and: Only real dividing muntin bars should be used in replica windows, not surface mounted grids that fake their appearance. Therefore, in order for the HPB to approve aluminum windows with impact glass panes, as is done outside of Bankers Row, the third paragraph of the section titled Windows on page 47 of the Bankers Row Development Plan should be added as follows: Windows Repair of damaged wood windows is always preferred to their replacement. Usually, individual pieces or sections of damaged wood can be consolidated using epoxy product made for this purpose. If damaged pieces of wood are too deteriorated, new wood can be shaped to match and pieced in. The do-it-yourselfer with trim carpenter capabilities and tools can do this kind of work. Operating parts of double hung windows (pulleys, chains or cord, and weights) can be repaired or replaced to restore smooth operation. Casement window operators usually require only dismantling, stripping or paint, cleaning and lubrication to be returned to working order. Replacement casement operators may obtained by mail order or from window parts specialists. Should it be necessary, new replacement wood windows can be made in local (Palm Beach County) millwork shops to match existing windows precisely; factory produced windows that fit the existing openings can closely approximate their appearance. Wood windows in standard historic sizes can sometimes be obtained from local architectural salvage and demolition companies. Trim details should be copied from the houses themselves. Only real dividing muntin bars should be used in replica windows, not surface mounted grids that fake their appearance. Derive trim details from existing buildings. Historically correct wood windows are always preferred. However, due to building code revisions after Hurricane Andrew, all new or replacement windows are required to have hurricane rated shutters or be constructed of impact resistant glass. Wood windows with impact resistant panes are prohibitively expensive and are not manufactured with true divided lights. Should it be necessary to install impact resistant glass, at the owner's request, new or replacement windows may be made of aluminum with impact resistant glass panes with applied exterior and interior dimensional muntins. Aluminum windows are to be installed according to the specifications set forth by the HPB so that they will not radically compromise the historic integrity of a structure. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Bankers Row design guidelines as amended above. File/s/pz/boards/hpb/Bankers Row amendment t. .. • 4... ,-Frp::,):_., fh,„,!, [,,,, ,„-„, [,,,T,,,,,, FT.,.,„,,,,•„:_.: ,..,,.. c.,1 ,-,„ , ,,,,__,,,,,,.„- L___.,,,,,.'-',,L1: 21:::' 1.-- ;L.-,H1 L :-r.L 1 ELRAYACH l O tBE D - - bitted All-Alt1EfIC2 City 100 N.W. 1st AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 • 561/243-7000 Illir 199January 12, 2000 • Cynthia Bush-Leeds Et Al Cynthia Bush-Leeds Trit Hldr 248 NE 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Dear Ms. Bush-Leeds, At its regular meeting of Wednesday, January 19, 2000 at 6:00 PM in the First Floor Conference Room at City Hall the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) will consider amending the Banker's Row Design Guidelines to allow the installation of aluminum windows with impact resistant glass panes. Currently the Banker's Row Design Guidelines require that the Board may approve only wood windows with true divided lights. The building codes were revised after Hurricane Andrew to require that all new or replacement windows have hurricane rated shutters or be constructed of impact resistant glass. Wood windows with impact glass panes are prohibitively expensive and are not manufactured with true divided lights. As a result, the HPB has been approving replacement windows with aluminum frames and impact glass for historic buildings, which are outside of Bankers Row, when requested by the owners. The HPB is currently working on specifications that will offer appropriate methods of installation for aluminum windows and their casings, so that they can be used without radically compromising the historic integrity of the buildings. You are cordially invited to attend this meeting and to give your opinion on the proposed amendment to the Bankers Row Design Guidelines. If you have any questions please phone me at 561-243-7284. Sincerely, - '7z-7:...-4----4.'..6-;' Patricia Cayce Historic Preservation Planner TKE EFFORT ALWAYS MATT_Rs Prwrr'an F&:.y:ieC Praer CD Community Redevelopment „„ia Agency Delray Beach MEMO TO: Pat Casey, Historic Preservation Board FROM: Chris Brown DATE: January 7, 2000 • RE: Redevelopment of Blocks 28 and 36,West Atlantic Avenue Pat: We have requested an audience with the Historic Preservation Board ("HPB") to discuss the redevelopment of lands within Blocks 28 and 36 in Delray Beach. These blocks lie between NW 3rd Avenue and NW 5th Avenue. A map is enclosed for reference. Much of the property lies within the West Settler's Historic District, and because of this, we wish to discuss the following issues: 1. The land uses permitted within the zoning district; 2. Potential zoning changes; 3. Alley abandonments in Block 36; 4. The CRA Request for Proposal process in the sale of the property; 5. Interest by the development industry in redeveloping the property; and 6. Potential historic district conflicts with redevelopment, if any. The purpose of the meeting is to inform HPB of our interest in the sale of the property, and once a developer(s)has been chosen,we would like to be prepared for any potential conflicts. Thank you for your assistance. /d Attach. • . . . . 24 N. Swinton Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33444 (561) 276-8640/ Fax (561) 276-8558 • MARTIN rumINollmi1mIN LUTHER I= Is ml lol NI NI KING JR!" INmgIN DRIVE LLIL_i LU Q • Q 2 7 4 o N I II 14 It F=- I 0 (c, 1 Lr) M Z I I. N.W. I 1ST ST. 1 ...•4•❖..:::❖:❖:❖Av; I 1 .••❖.❖.••❖••:::••••••••••••••❖. . I ❖.❖.❖.❖.•:s:❖.❖.❖•❖.•. I :......... .......... II .......... • • I z .-..........•.... :-:•: :::::* z I I FIRE 1 . ........ .. ::: : =:=:=:! 11 ON TENNIS S TA TI 1 N+:!:+:-:- :•:•:❖:❖:❖: :::❖4 ;;:;:;:;.;:;.;. STADIUM ........ .......... ..................... ............•.........• :••••••••.•••••••••• P••••...••••.vow.•• ATLANTIC AVENUE I- LU LLI 'a > Q POLICE SOUTH Q = l T COMPLEX COUNTY o _ n COURT• N — HOUSE N WEST SETTLERS HISTORIC DISTRICT • LEGEND: . 3 0 MI Nil MI MI PLANNING DEPARTMENT ----•-•-- CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL C.R.A. OWNED LOTS BLOCK NUMBER HISTORIC BOUNDARY -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LMA16 Property Available for Development Delray Beach, Florida I - 1 N'W' 1ST AVENUE T "• MT. OLIVE - i z BAPTIST CHURCH - — I _ - TENNIS - -_ N a =o STADIUM l B STFA 11IRE0N 3 z ; s 3 - NO. 1 - 2n 36 i N ATLANTIC AVENUE -assw- POLICE COURT i STATION HOUSE - i -Ir_ _, 300 & 400 Blocks of West Atlantic Avenue between NW 3rd and NW 5th Avenues (See reverse side for aerial) • Easy access to 1-95, Federal Highway and AIA • 3.68 Acres (160,648 square feet) • In close proximity to Downtown, South County Courthouse, City Tennis Center and Fire/Police Stations • Mixed-Use desired - retail with office and/or residential use • Zoned General Commercial (GC)/West Atlantic Overlay District • Sites available separately or together u....0 /f1 r .. 1 -- =. Ba For Information Contact: Community Redevelopment ® . � Agency 1 • . t • CD Delray Beach \ • : ■a 24 North Swinton Avenue 77: Delray Beach, Florida 33444 .i r (561) 276-8640 ®; / ow. °w; U- : (561) 276-8558 fax �,• =, i.lI"7N y, j ` ,II' • ,T�' i �i 'b 'rt ,'� ^',rl .,r' 'r�i�li P ,r" - f w1 r idyl IIdI GI" II:'Iu Wlry it"1 ,Wa .�MIp� ON • 1 �f y D ''. ac •0. tl .II I 11 IIYIWJW .�. F �, p I� J I1.• ^ � � —i+.. • i P: ' "�''1' • w •.I is IN U 1II • o M1, R , w h',y�1j l" .,. 1x�RT:+ L. 1 NI ' �r'rmu ��'�1lu Iwl ° I gll III - 4 irk w 001,r I,q'*„ w z.Ir `"z. ` " ' + .r I„sp.iill........ ,.. ... ... 1 " w� + 1 n 4 h d , •� "a ;11 .r.- •b n•.•-- . lt. .. 1 ' .. Il IIW� y ,��''•q1 .r'�_ 1 � , � I i:l I I II • ::r r ....'Lw• „r w 1 M � ', UC I' rt 1 ,,,1n • .J" _p �r a r .�1 �, IU�I III e' Y4 I, 1 - YI n , ,,, *, I�,. �, .. ...,1r i.„" I 1 ^, ik L� li. .1 i ' 111. .-!., c d. II�;..o,.'. •" Y .I= y, PI w 'r '� wN ' • ..•• 11 t rid' " �` ll VI ; � 'il � wF /; I Ihy • ""41 S I +T' 1 i , TY 5 i ( 11 k�4V zwoaw .'r Old SCp 7 : tr I 'is rIll *i L 1 1 • rle I a. _ • f8 I � 4 qI1 t ! Idw �: IK . I;- .i is 11 . �' =� -� ' est Atlantic Avenue - *i.'or ar. I ► . ~ `w _ " p- , 1 4 r 1 $1,4 1 ot, ' S , IIIIl r16,p 1 Ik. r�' 111wa U'.—._ a L .7 low' _ 1 ill ^i . La pk y tt t rtho T I '� • y�, y �,.I - : _ s-',r_ }11C' t42 :� �:��_ , } n, liIPId IwM �; ` :.� �I` 4."�„y- '. 1 w. go-.T Lilo _. ,''• r ti. r ' � i 4xF , } Fit, 11 III I f 4 el ILL r, kv1 . w �„ " 1v n +�. .`+I�R/�t:Yu 1. +d "«� • .' .,;�,... «. Ip:� r i� .�. �, ., ''x�`"C: a,"I p �.fir, _ � •'� j Ilf' .,. 1 ':�I III I # y1 1 'll'.0 1 10 '.• - • u. , 4 a r y t + R 11Y, . .err 4 , - II,,. I =: i 1 •1 . iNot -' HiIlSt4'RJpE 7W- : rOt4 BO D .. . - - . .' i. si T.. �..J. r ...tYf ,:,, rti E 't-`� .r Project Name: COA-334— Continuation (Sundy Inn Cottage) • Project Location: 113 SW 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District The action requested of the Board is that of granting approval for revisions to the design elements previously approved for the Sundy Inn Cottage, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E). The single-family one-story cottage was constructed in 1925 in the vernacular style and was part of the Sundy family compound. It is now part of the Sundy Inn complex. At the meeting of March 18, 1998 the HPB approved plans for renovation of the cottage. On June 16, 1999 the HPB approved modifications to the approved plans which included redesign of the east elevation. At the June 16th meeting the Board reviewed, but did not take action on, the proposed changes to the front porch which faces SW 1st Avenue. Because the changes to the front/west porch necessitated a variance to the front setback requirements, the applicant asked that the modifications to the front porch not be considered until a formal variance request was submitted. At its meeting of September 1, 1999, the HPB approved a variance to allow the front porch of the nonconforming historic structure to be enlarged in length. On October 6, 1999, the Board approved the final elevations and design elements for the cottage. The revisions to the cottage are as follows: ❑ Install standing seam copper roof to match others on the site, as opposed to the approved copper shingles. i Retain the existing stucco for the exterior walls. West Elevation ❑ Retain original front porch and porch columns. Meeting Date:January 19,2000 Agenda Item: IV: C HPB Staff Report COA-334 Continuation—113 SW 1st Avenue (Sundy Inn Cottage) Page 2 Eliminate the trellis to the north and south of the existing porch on the west elevation. The approved deck will be constructed to the north and south of the existing porch, but will be screened by the privacy wall to the west. East Elevation 0 Relocate 2 windows so that they are adjacent to the 2 south windows. The revised window location allows 4 of the original window locations to remain. ❑ Add a double entry door to the north of the relocated windows, as opposed to the approved single door in the center of the façade. _ �Tx'�"� �� ` `AAA1C �'��Ofi7 4 �*n�4rG+:.�dr!.c G•'t 1`SN2T':.lS+...✓ti "e'.,.r ..'� .�_. 1Vr. 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented. R E CEO M 71111EAi`fl Tl � Y =. Approve the revised design elements for COA-334 Continuation based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), as presented. Fife/s/pz/hboards/hpb/coa-334 cottage revision-2-sr • JOB: SUNDY COTTAGE • PERMIT No.: 99-63229 REVISION: BALFOORT FINNVOLD ARCHITECTURE, INC. n OWNER REQUESTED REVISIONS !`\ 1.4.00 266 NORTHEAST 6 AVENUE DELRAY BEACH,FL 33444 p 661.278.3236 f 661.278.2010 LICENSE#AA 0003262 EXISTING ENTRY PORCH AND COLUMNS I I TO REMAIN, ADD NEW WOOD PORCH ) 2 NEW STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOF, TYPICAL EXISTING STUCCO TO BE PAINTED, I 1 TYPICAL, PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED AI II _ t1 11 -, I_ „ ,. ,. V. d ///��SITE WALL W116 W119 W101 - W102 / III II L[�--=J L=J-J.1 T II r--, II —T 1_1_=J111[.._ JJ� I IIID1o1 III 1 4 I II L___I II I I I_.11__ ..11___I I rr=--rr rl r---- -I rt TT---=T I I I I I I I II I ; I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I EXIS11NC NEW PORCH PORCH ^ NEW PORCH /f 1\1 1 EXISTING EXTERIOR DOOR TO REMAIN SUNDY COTTAGE - NEW WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" i • ■ JOB: BUNDY COTTAGE PERMIT No.: 99 3229 REVISION: BALFOORT FINNVOLD ARCHITECTURE, INC. AOWNER REQUESTED REVISIONS /`` 1.4.00 258 NORTHEAST 6 AVENUE DELRAY BEACH,FL 33444 p 801.270.3238 f 681.276.2010 LICENSE M AA 0003252 6" COPPER GUTTER ACROSS THE FACE OF COVERED PORCH, SEE ROOF PLAN f 1, NEW OPEN EXTERIOR PORCH NEW STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOF, TYPICAL EXISTING STUCCO TO BE PAINTED, 111111 TYPICAL, PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED - o U u U u t i 1 u u u i u u U wlos w109 w110 w111 • it D107 _1 T_ 1 1 11 20.94" FIN. FLOOR SUNDY COTTAGE = NEW EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ■ JOB: BLIND?COTTAGE PERMIT No.: 9983229 REVISION: BALFOORT FINNVOLD ARCHITECTURE, INC. AOWNER REQUESTED REVISIONS 1.4.00 255 NORTHEAST 8 AVENUE ,FL p 6C1.27OELRAYCBEACH.3238 f 881.23344478.2010 NEW STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOF, LICENSE M AA 0003282 .....i) TYPICAL EXISTING STUCCO TO BE PAINTED, TYPICAL, PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED A REMOVE EXISTING ROOF SHINGLES. PROVIDE HOT MOPPED 90LB FELT OVER 30 LB TIN TAGGED 0 6" O.C. EA. WAY, WITH NEW COPPER STANDING SEAM I I ROOF (FASTENERS AS PER J 'S MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS). (\ 1 2x WD RAFTERS WITH 1 x6 T&G PLANKING WITH 30LB FELT TIN TAGGED 0 6" O.C. EA. WAY, WITH COPPER STANDING SEAM ROOF (FASTENERS PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS). r,I 1 I III-.,,.......L.; ,� /%G�/// • ct e 01:: ct rz I i /I .-- ifd REPLACE EXISTING WINDOWS SUNDY COTTAGE - SOUTH ELEVATION FOR EGRESS CASEMENT WINDOWS SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" JOB: SUNDY COTTAGE ■ PERMIT No.: 99-e322e REVISION: BALFOORT FINNVOLD ARCHITECTURE, INC. AAOWNER REQUESTED REVISIONS 1.4.00 200 NORTHEAST 0 AVENUE DELRAY BEACH,FL 33444 p 001.270.3230 f 561.270.2010 LICENSE 0 AA 0003252 NEW STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOF, TYPICAL EXISTING STUCCO TO BE PAINTED, TYPICAL, PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED lJ A 5 tru• vim I I I Ot * I 1 _ I SUNDY COTTAGE - NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" (1 1 / i,�' ', •,'vti I, 1. ..' • r . • 11�(`.NG1`I`S • � ! • ;1,•,i , •/:• ' 4'r• i(* .,,,,; ,1; ..'I '' • ••) ' • V 11 , .[� � '+ .` 4• , , tiib'.jkn `j,kiti�' 111irk • ( , r1. ,vy. ' .I: Il ' 1 1• •1' 1'l ' ,4 k.her'�I . t� .,1 ` '�l if 1 1'„....,...4„.....,,,,...„..:. ,. .. .1 1.5'l ({Y tr' t� •, ' , •' i'1.11' •..: 1 1 1 , 1 ' }- 1 ;i'(I I( r , I ,.\: .•.r.re IA,,•,, ,c-i f .... 1 1 1 }! 'i 11 ( ,' { t a I •i I ,11 1' }; • , . . ,,.,•.•,,: .. :.•,,,y,,.. ,, .,....,•,,. 0 ................................., 4 exwmtratioL qi). 1' i . • •," °1'1 ♦ 4.PAW' . ♦ ,ram •T.1;1••rV NM It it t'4 1,, '•i•'. 7... •" „I. p` "y•,, w T AhC•'i''1 :1'.. (del Y (••11 'f' Ct� ".,l1Rr� t .• 17'M • t,'1"��M! • 'f^�M'., .1 4 ♦ ,rl:... 'r 't, f �''l' • .. ( ,'I. 1rt. ' .t il.,101'1�., 41.1 . .1,-l( .l •t..,l,4 i10 1.1 ,1r•:� , • •' ,1• •u.. ,••.•' ..' .r...r',.••►,» ,•. . `, ( �,5(I rj �. 7a27 1 �y. 1 r,l.�j• hJ.:�q�. �. 'll.•4 �.1.'..,f.�,�i'`. I .i.�' A.� GT,1s • .� '�. r '1 y '\•ti {���JI'"�••,''+++�"7�`�MM',♦ r.. . �'i if1. � �il k i o,); f ,„1.: ':,. 1 �.t:K 1. 1t, 1•: Ct`'1 1 ' + . � r (, l• , +•: '1� 1"S ,i ri :'' IX ,,t€, !w.l;,''';'• `d' yy t, 1• !. Pt J d h �'1%414'0 7 t'r ,��r 9'• i f,t'y,1 T.al r,;; .J. •1 1 1 �:,. �.! i !1+,r�.1 •tp,�'k lq,l+ll! f^j1,.1'1 iQ.' •1,"�', )1 + k {r�A fr�dl�l..'TI S Yir �. {' �' R 4 j'`1:1. � }, ♦( �:• tr S't:4;t,••tr;�'�.,, , ',.�' t•��pC' 'l,t.}1j1�•�J ♦{$•1•`�•.'1t4�'/i�Kf ,1 !�'rl• ,� � �� !�!){.ttr.;`'••4 '�."t� . 'M�,l�d r�,`l`9��t �'•�1it1��'!i�i'',14r �::�Jn 1:�i'A„ 1.{. .•'' ., •..'�•:;/..'�;,•;,.'$ r<�4 4,{i 1, + .,.. r'r . 1 7 .4 Y.k a •1r T'� 1•4C: 1 �1 �INli .. . .U. q,J}1'44. ''^':t.i ••••..•t t., e.• y ''y v {!a �rMS ( t �1Y,,{S 1 t;. v ' 11 Y. 'l! S + • ;' 1•• i'.,,, '� !�.,„t�'r► I,„. ,T ,, 1,t'i}+ r T,+d • A 7 1 :??llel%�r71 1 AT5)i� 13«i! k" '`''1'� � T �' �� "f 4i�I .1�7i'�1�Y%r}; r ^,lj�%'�,.?1%: i?�.:',1. .���;1r+': :.•'jiI " ,(` 1 +1 t�w �" ! 4 .. ,rr 4 . � ,!,,lie, ''r`, . p 1": it 4,. L ,, , J• 1i 1. , ..� .�. •.' � !Cnr r•,. ..,,,• .� gp' 9 t F- 1, t Y' i 1�.R; ., tit, .4,•.�' i l K "y !`' it�T i�i �.tli;l}gidlti �tYa�{�1�L3.' ,•"Irr _ "�41E.4' �.�t t,. '•••r..r.t.t,;tr1y'�1,•:•• '}r,;''�'4••ey11,.t,�'i :•' '.' . . - frill��T" -I—�V�•�ol-,I c" ` 1-►: r(d 'I�.�1 ... •,•V,l: :1 1 K.- -- .s vN U ' l��p�.kr a:,114��' ',� i"/'tV�• yt,� /tm •tl ,� ,.'.- r •.! +A t 1,1 Z ,,,, a:• .,i•in' .{T .. ,;;J..,......„ •f I • '' 1•�4• 4).114 It},, ` 4 ') Q 113�� i:m •'1 r ••'t'.•^;,' 'w�',......0 i Ng' ik A�1'b1 , k t.y Li'•I :i•t• • .► I ,� 'L•. - iv},t( r }h� 1. ,•..• I • .I, .•; �.-- k, �1 t A (1 g•1! .,, YV T1,+`I I. ,. `M`Ix i ir,.. ,• ,'Iia. • .�T�,l . , {.,t r t , • yi �M.,ri).rr ;rt fe I.,..r, 4. !S 7/ 4,�, 1 t i 1:1 - ,�N ,+,- :.. !r' a ! � b • 1 i is • �►• .I I I� 'rr.. T T,' '1..i ♦. _ , ".2mrill a A. o • t 1. 1 ' 1 , r r r F . '`1 11111. 1 7r • + /.. •,.. , ). ai' y111 1 1•, All •ip '`•.I " i',iF �a v , { .41 : ►_ I r . •,+' ,�r, .'el''''1 r ' -TI•:'M.Iy ,�'.,.•.• . 1 • .�•n-jj may, ..... ,.,,,•CN,,•'y,=4/R.. ., r.•r.r,l,t',-.7., ,• ,i.1;:.•i..'t.:•r, .,•... '' .11, .. ; � ' O /' ''},i•'• ryj1.11 r ! •• r,.,•• lii• 1 ' fa71 .1ati • ''.•'i.;,;y„�1,'i.• ' , r \` 1 .. ..'. .r 1. 4,Z. .�• . •. '/t�V.,\*•!r'1"j. ,. 1'11{.:1'1•`T•1,;a'• .�:''I�1 :`, •f,a . •,. ,.. • ' . `14I-1�G l�JC-7`r it-1 . . ......-- . \,.. . ••I I 1 I I 1 11 1 1 11 1 AR 1114 LUT.ER '' I E-1 I -II I I I 11 H I I I 11 • Ili 1 1-•! • I . . r.<I •• I :•-•• HALL I __ - ---______ _ 111 ii•—. ,. . j Ell Iz I ..---•• - 1,I H.w. 1ST ST, Nt.L 1ST 51. r---' •- : 3 cal.:awn-1' I P a a-N7ER I z - d I ..."M J 7.7:NhILS• T.--I II • I> D w :.1- -1 S7AINUM III li< •53 0:•J.1°7-:L.; Li I . • I ATLANTIC AVENUE±_ji COUSpUrri. i I I• I i I I I' II I I I TV CDUIR7 7-1I III 7-11-1 L- ,s- -- --- .1 il 1 p ....—___ .:c-1 1 ...t<.-1 II 1 I I 1---ii ,___,, ...,__ L..___,= 1 i 1 , . 111E I .s.-::::-1.1 ,---1111 L. 1— I s I 1 LST. ,.,..,...... 1 1 1 II • i..---4,___, --:-75?I L-J 1 II 1-=11.-- II L—II -L i_j. ___ ,____1, ' I ' I ii, ,____,,, -i II , I : ,r---1,1 - ii , ,, i II ,____,, -: L.J ni i I III 1 I ____j r----1, 1 E. 1 SOK. • 2P0 S1.. S.M 2h1D ST. I-11 11111I I I: I I 1 , 1 1 L__01______1 . . 1 . „,... .....1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 —1--- 1 1 1 .;-1 i r- , = , I I I I 1 1----Huri LE S-11. .ORD ST. S.r. ZRD ISLT4 i r---- 1:0 AtrRR.ITT 1 I 1 i 1-- I 1 li 1 —I PARK l 1 I—II r__I ' i-- = 1 . . . _ I 1 I If I 1--- i I, I-- . 1 1- i—H r-----gmss,_ -- , l__V 1 171 i —1 i II I - . . • . _ . • DELRAY BEACH kittri All•AmericaCity 111111 AGENDA 1993 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: February 2, 2000 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • January 19, 2000 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Preliminare Pre-Application: Lots 20 and 21,Block 69, Old School Square Historic District. Presented by Michael Covelli, Caulfield &Wheeler, Inc. Provide Comments and Direction for the Design of a Proposed Parking Garage. IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS ITEMS A. Consider the Revised Amendment to the Bankers Row Design Guidelines with Respect to the use of Aluminum Windows with Impact Glass. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff VI. ADJOURN Pat Cayce Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: JANUARY 28, 2000 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 2000 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:10 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Hurlbut, Tony Keller, Shane Ames, Dave Bodker, Mary Lou Jamison, John Johnson, Gail-Lee McDermott STAFF PRESENT: Pat Cayce, Diana Mund II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of January 19, 2000 were before the Board for consideration. Mr. Ames moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0. Mrs. Cayce asked the Board to amend the agenda to add Items lll.B. 218 NE 5th Court and Ill.C. 219 NE 1st Avenue. The Board was of the consensus to do so. As the applicant for III.A. was not ready to present, the Board amended the agenda to hear lll.B. first. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: B. COA Pre-Application: 218 NE 5th Court, Single Family Residence, Del- Ida Park Historic District. Bodil Marc, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of comment and direction with respect to the construction of a 6' high cbs wall along the front of the property (125' in length) and extending approximately 45' to the south along the west property line. The front wall is to have a pedestrian gate and a driveway gate, both gates will be topped with a decorative square arch with a clay barrel tiled pent roof. Clay barrel tile, installed horizontally, will top the cbs wall. The carport is to be constructed adjacent to the side wall, approximately 2.5' from the west side property line, where 7.5' is required. The carport and wall gate arches will require variances to the front and side setback requirements. The Board felt that they could support the variances for the gate arches as well as the carport and recommended that a formal variance application be submitted. As the wall is not predicated by the variances being granted, the applicant can apply for a building permit, excluding the gate arches and carport, to allow construction of the wall to commence. The applicant is aware that if the variances are not granted, neither the walls gate arches nor the carport can be constructed as planed. The plan presented to the Board indicated that the pedestrian gate and driveway gate had different styles of arches, the applicant will present revised plans to reflect the change in arch design for the pedestrian gate when the variance request is reviewed. A. Preliminary Pre-Application: Lots 20 and 21, Block 69, Old School Square Historic District. Presented by Michael Covelli, Caulfield & Wheeler, Inc. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of comment and direction for the design of a proposed parking garage associated with the Block 77 Development. The development proposal involves the construction of a 5 level parking garage on the west side of SE 1st Avenue. The Board was asked to provide comments with respect to the appropriateness of the design as it relates to the criteria set forth in the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, New Construction; its relationship to the streetscape; and its design impact on the Old School Square Historic District. The following narrative is a summary of the Board's comments: 1. It was noted that the rendering and the elevations indicate that the plane of the walls is relieved by projections, while the floor plan indicated a flat wall. The applicant explained that the projections were only inches deep applied stucco. The Board felt that the building's elevations should be broken up to relieve the flat and box-like appearance. It was suggested that the front façade should have the appearance of townhouses joined together. This would create various wall planes, which would be more appropriate to the residential character of the street. 2. It was suggested that the design was not compatible with the other buildings in the area and that it looked more appropriate for Boca Raton than for the historic district. It was felt that the Mission Revival style might be more harmonious and acceptable. -2- HPB Minutes 2/2/00 3. The north tower appears obtrusive and should be reduced in height; the metal roof seems to add to its visibility. A flat tower roof should be considered. As the Mission Revival style accommodates an asymmetrical façade the difference between the north and south roof corners can be a design asset. Additionally, the parapet between the corners can be accented with a typical Mission or bell curve, to create a design element at the roofline. 4. Smaller windows and awnings should be considered for the first floor. The openings on the other floors should be made smaller so as to appear more residential in character. Muntins should be applied to the openings on the upper floors. The pedestrian exit door on SE 1st Avenue (east elevation) must be redesigned so that it does not open directly on to the sidewalk and become an element of the front façade. 5. More landscaping is necessary, including Fig Ivy and Bougainvillea trained to the walls. 6. The Board would consider granting variances to the front and rear setback requirements if it would allow the front plane of the structure to be more varied by projections; and if space for additional landscaping were provided 7. The Board felt that it would be beneficial to the project if Lots 23 & 24 (the vacant lot to the north of the proposed garage and the lot adjacent to the east/west alley, behind the Masonic Lodge) could be acquired. If the north end of the garage were adjacent to the alley, the streetscape would be improved due to more consistency in building heights, and the possibility of stepping the building down toward the south. 8. The Board requested that the applicants review the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, New Construction, before proceeding with design revisions. 9. The Board requested that an elevation of the streetscape on the west side of SE 1s Avenue, reflecting the proposed garage, be provided when the design revisions are next reviewed. The Board also requested that a streetscape for the east side of SE 1st Avenue (Block 77 apartments) be provided. IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. Consider the Revised Amendment to the Bankers Row Design Guidelines with Respect to the Use of Aluminum Windows with Impact Glass. -3- HPB Minutes 2/2/00 The following Bankers Row property owners were present at the meeting: Cynthia Bush Leeds Everitt Cecelia Boone 248 NE 1st Avenue 239 NE 1st Avenue Patricia Kaufman Jarad Hunt 235 NE 1st Avenue 211 NE 1st Avenue After discussion, it was determined that the Bankers Row property owners chose not to add the proposed amendment regarding the use of aluminum windows to the Bankers Row Design Guidelines. The majority of property owners feel that the existing guidelines reflect what is appropriate for the type of windows to be installed in the historic homes. Each request for a window change, whether new of replacement, will be heard by the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) through the Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) review process on a case by case basis. HPB will continue to use the criteria set forth in the Bankers Row Design Guidelines as a basis for COA approval. Aluminum windows, with standard glass or impact glass, will be permitted on the side and rear elevations. Wood windows will be required for all front facades. It was moved by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Mr. Ames and passed 7-0 to deny the proposed amendment to the Bankers Row Design Guidelines. At the suggestion of Gene Fisher, 247 NE 1st Avenue, the following procedure will be followed with respect to design changes for Bankers Row properties: • When a COA is received by the Planning Department for any design change, including windows, for a property located in Bankers Row, all Bankers Row property owners will be notified by mail. The proposed changes will be available in the Planning Department for review and comments by all Bankers Row property owners prior to the HPB meeting. It is hoped that all property owners will take the opportunity to review the COA proposal and will attend the associated HPB meeting and provide comments to the Board. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: C. COA 399 Continuation: 219 NE 1st Avenue, Bankers Row Historic District. Jeffery Silberstein, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering approval for a change in roof color from previously approved Medium Gray composition shingles to Dark Gray composition shingles. -4- HPB Minutes 2/2/00 Due to the pending appeal, it was moved by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-2 (Keller & Ames dissenting) to deny acting on COA 399-Continuation (for a change in roof shingle color) at this time. This was an add on agenda item and came to the Board after the Bankers Row amendment with respect to windows was heard. At the Bankers Row property owners request, the windows amendment was not added to the Bankers Row Design Guidelines. Therefore, aluminum windows cannot be approved for front facades. The applicant, Mr. Silberstein, has an appeal pending before the City Commission meeting of February 15, 2000 to overturn HPB's decision to require wood windows on the front facade. It is noted that the applicant may reapply for the color change after the appeal is resolved. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives Mrs. Riley, Marina Historic District, inquired if the Board had reviewed the proposed improvement plans for the City Marina. It was noted that the Board has not reviewed the proposed improvement plans and they expressed the opinion that even though it is a City project, HPB review is required. The general feeling of the Board was "why should the City be exempt from its own rules?" The Board requested that they have an opportunity to review the plans as soon as possible. However, if the City is exempt from Board review the Board would like to know why. B. Board Members Ms. Jamison inquired if the landscaping for the Sundy Inn Valet Parking Lot was complete? It was her understanding that the landscaping would buffer the parking lot so that the vehicles would not be visible from the street. Ms. Hurlburt inquired about the status of the unapproved lights at the Check Cashing Store. The Board was of the consensus that a letter should be sent to Code Enforcement in reference to enforcing their approvals. C. Staff Mrs. Cayce informed the Board that Ann's Dog Grooming at 302 NE 1st Avenue had redesigned the sign with out getting a COA. The Board was of the consensus to approve the redesigned sign as presented based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 and the Design Guidelines. -5- HPB Minutes 2/2/00 VII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, Mr. Johnson moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:00 P.M., seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 7-0. The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 2, 2000, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on February 16, 2000. /& Diana'Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -6- HPB Minutes 2/2/00 HISTORIC PRESERVATION ,-;;BOARD STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO BANKERS ROW DESIGN GUIDELINES •~ ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approving a revised amendment to the Bankers Row Design Guidelines to allow the installation of aluminum windows with impact resistant glass panes. BACKGROUND The Bankers Row Design Guidelines require that new or replacement windows be made of wood. However, the Standard Building Code was revised after Hurricane Andrew to require that all new or replacement windows have hurricane rated shutters or be constructed of impact resistant glass. Wood windows with impact glass panes are prohibitively expensive and are not manufactured with true divided lights. As a result, the HPB has been approving requests to allow new and replacement windows with aluminum frames and impact glass for historic buildings outside of Bankers Row. The Board recently denied an application to allow aluminum windows on the front façade of the Silberstein office on Bankers Row (219 NE 1st Avenue), due to the requirements of the design guidelines. Mr. Silberstein appealed that decision to the City Commission, but requested a postponement of that appeal pending an assessment by HPB of this requirement. A proposed amendment to the guidelines that would allow aluminum windows under certain circumstances was presented to the Board at the meeting of January 19, 2000. At that meeting the Board was informed that the Bankers Row property owners association would be meeting on Saturday, January 22, 2000 at the Gene Fisher residence, 247 NE 1st Avenue. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the Bankers Row design guidelines, particularly with regard to the windows. Therefore, the Board was asked not to take formal action on the amendment to the Banker Row design guidelines until the results of the association's meeting were known. The Board voted to continue the item to the February 2nd meeting. Twelve people attended the meeting of the Bankers Row property owners association. The owners discussed a number of issues related to the preservation of the architectural character of the structures in this block, and indicated strong support for the use of original materials whenever possible. The association voted to support the use of aluminum windows on a case by case basis, when installed in accordance with specific standards. Attached is an excerpt from the minutes of that meeting describing the association's position. The original draft of the amended guidelines has been revised to include their suggestions (indicated in bold type). Meeting Date: February 2, 2000 Agenda Item: lV-A s HPB Staff Report Amendment to Bankers Row design guidelines Page 2 LY ANA S1S Page 77 of the Bankers Row Development Plan states: • Any changes to the exterior of a structure require review and approval of the Historic Preservation Board. This is accommodated through the COA process. The design guidelines contained in Chapter lii of this plan shall supersede all other historic guidelines, which may exist. Compliance with the style specific guidelines included herein, shall warrant issuance of a COA. Chapter III of the Guidelines states the following with respect to window replacement: All new and replacement windows and doors, exterior wall finishes and roofing materials shall be consistent with the historic features. No existing non-compatible feature or material shall be added to or altered unless it is replaced by historically appropriate feature or material; and: Only real dividing muntin bars should be used in replica windows, not surface mounted grids that fake their appearance. Therefore, in order for the HPB to approve aluminum windows with impact glass panes, as is done outside of Bankers Row, the third paragraph of the section titled Windows on page 47 of the Bankers Row Development Plan should be added as follows: Windows Repair of damaged wood windows is always preferred to their replacement. Usually, individual pieces or sections of damaged wood can be consolidated using epoxy product made for this purpose. If damaged pieces of wood are too deteriorated, new wood can be shaped to match and pieced in. The do-it-yourselfer with trim carpenter capabilities and tools can do this kind of work. Operating parts of double hung windows (pulleys, chains or cord, and weights) can be repaired or replaced to restore smooth operation. Casement window operators usually require only dismantling, stripping or paint, cleaning and lubrication to be returned to working order. Replacement casement operators may obtained by mail order or from window parts specialists. Should it be necessary, new replacement wood windows can be made in local (Palm Beach County) millwork shops to match existing windows precisely; factory produced windows that fit the existing openings can closely approximate their appearance. Wood windows in standard historic sizes can sometimes be obtained from local architectural salvage and demolition companies. Trim details should be copied from the houses themselves. Only real dividing muntin bars should be used in replica windows, not surface mounted grids that fake their appearance. Derive trim details from existing buildings. Historically correct wood windows are always preferred. However, due to building code revisions after Hurricane Andrew, all new or replacement windows are required to have f HPB Staff Report Amendment to Bankers Row design guidelines Page 3 hurricane rated shutters or be constructed of impact resistant glass. Wood windows with impact resistant panes are prohibitively expensive and are not manufactured with true divided lights. Should it be necessary to install impact resistant glass, at the owner's request, new or replacement windows may be made of aluminum with impact resistant glass panes with applied exterior and interior dimensional muntins. Aluminum windows may only be installed with impact glass and each request for aluminum windows will be reviewed on a case by case basis. All new or replacement windows, whether aluminum or wood, shall have historically correct framing; wood framing for the Mackie Cottages; sill and lintels shall be retained on the Mediterranean Revival style houses on the west side of the street. Aluminum windows are to be installed according to the specifications set forth by the HPB so that they will not radically compromise the historic integrity of a structure. RECOMMENDATION Approve the amendments to the Bankers Row design guidelines as described above. File/s/pz/boards/hpb/Bankers Row amd-2-sr c. r. 4 .The Vote: The majority voted YES to the following: That Bankers Row current window and door codes would remain as written to allow use of wood windows and doors with true dividing lights and standard glass. That an amendment would be written to allow impact resistant aluminum and aluminum clad wood windows and doors on a case-by-case bases as long as the quality of materials is superior and that proper casings, brick molds, shutters and finishes are historically accurate. The homeowners of Bankers Row wish to stipulate in the writing of the amendment that historic facade of the building must be preserved. Special attention must be given by the HPB insure that the aluminum and aluminum clad/ wood windows and doors reflect the original style of the buildings. The homeowners wish to have a direct voice in writing the spec' s and guidelines in window and door amendment. They have appointed Gene Fisher and Jarad Hunt as their representatives, with Cecelia Boone and Cynthia Bush as their alternate representative. 5. Banker Row Homeowners Association Inc. : The homeowners of Banker's Row feel that their association is important to them and have voiced a need to maintain the corporation. Gene Fisher requests a contribution of $25.00 per property held by the members of Banker Row (Total of $450 .00 ) to be collected for the maintenance and expenses incurred by Bankers Row Home Owners Association Inc. Please send a check made out to B.R.H.A. Inc. and mail it to Gene. Thank you. 6 . Meeting was adjourned. Cynthia Bush Leeds A.K.A. Cynthia Bush Everitt 248 N.E. First Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone: 561 -274-8884 or 608-837-0332 February 2, 2000 Ms. Patricia Cayce Historic Preservation Planner City of Delray Beach 100 N.W. First Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 RE: Bankers Row Window Codes Comments from Bankers Row Homeowners on the new revised amendment. Dear Pat, I have received a number of phone calls from the homeowners on Banker Row commenting on the proposed revised amendment, and I thought it best to forward them to you before the meeting. 1 . Although not written in the Banker Row window code, I have been advised by some of the homeowners on the Mackle side of the street that they have been allowed to use wind resistant aluminum windows on the sides and back of their cottages as long as the front facade (or visible sides of the house) have wooden windows with shutters. Those home owners wish that they be allowed to continue to use this method of window replacement. A. They feel that the amended code may restrict their ability to use wind resistant aluminum and that they will be forced to use either Impact Glass Aluminum or Wood on the rear of their homes. They wish that this point be reviewed and an adjustment to revised amendment be considered. B. They have commented that their understanding of the amendment was that use of Impact Glass Aluminum was for window replacement in cottages that were to be used commercially. Their understanding of the amendment was that the Impact Aluminum was being used to prevent "Snatch and Grab" . There is a suggestion that the amendment allow for Impact Glass Aluminum on the Mackle homes "only when the end use of the cottage is commercial and in that case then the entire building should be converted to Impact Resistant Aluminum" for uniformity. 2. Another concern about the proposed revised amendment is that it does not clearly specify the wish of the homeowners to have window codes which differ according to the two architectural styles on this block. It is felt that the revised amendment is too broad. The homeowner had voted to have a voice in the RE: Bankers Row Window Codes Comments from Bankers Row Homeowners on the new revised amendment. Page #2 specifications of the windows. Perhaps the revised amendment merely should reference the detailed window code specifications which will be finalized shortly. Although a few window replacement projects will be on hold until the finalized Banker Row window Codes are in place. This is what the homeowners of this block wish. There is a universal wish of the homeowners to preserve the unique historic charm of this block. A few points which the homeowner' s wish to detail in these window specification are: A. The best window replacement for the Samual Ogren architecture is Historically Correct Wood Windows with standard glazing. No other window construction should be considered unless there is a total "change out" of windows. If there is a total window "change-out" an acceptable alternate window material is aluminum clad/wood with impact glass. Aluminum windows should never be allowed. B. The best window replacement for the Mackle architecture is Historically Correct Wood Windows with standard glazing. Wood window facades with Wind Resistant Aluminum at the rear and non-visible sides of the building can be allowed. No other window construction should be considered unless there is a total "change -out" of windows. If there is a total window "change- out" and acceptable alternate window material is aluminum with impact glass or aluminum clad/wood with impact glass. C. Each request for window replacement will be reviewed on a case by case basis. all new or replacement window shall have historically correct framing, casements and brick moldings wood framing for the Mackle Cottages; sill and lintel shall be retained on the Mediterranean Revival style houses on the west side of the street. D. All windows must be approved by the HPB so that they will not radically compromise the historic integrity of a structure. E. The homeowners wish to detail shutters, mullions and other architectural details as well. Pat, I will be happy to review this with you over the phone. I believe a few of the home owners will attend the meeting tomorrow and voice many of the points I have detailed above. Most sincerely, z/Z/o 0 1. The amendment will not prohibit the use of wood windows on front façade and impact resistant aluminum windows on other facades. A. For any façade, aluminum windows will only be approved if made of impact resistant glass. B. The minutes of the Bankers row property owners meeting of January 22,2000 do not reflect the fact that aluminum windows with impact glass would be used on commercial buildings only. 2. Pages 64,65,66 and 67 of the Bankers row guidelines clarify the types of windows for the cottages and the Mediterranean structures. 3. If the HPB specifications for window installation do not meet with the property owner's expectations, they can be revised. A. This seems inconsistent, the HPB should review. Why is it inappropriate to use aluminum windows on secondary facades and retain wood on front facades? B. Same comment as above. C. This is stated in the amendment. D. The HPB will be guided by the Bankers Row guidelines. E. The amendment states that applied muntins will be dimensional and will be installed on both sides of the pane. All shutters should be correctly dimensioned and be operable. Shutters used for hurricane protection for all replacement windows, which are not impact glass, must be hurricane rated and approved by the building department. • DELRAY BEACH issili Albmerica ACity 11 IT • AGENDA 1993 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: February 16, 2000 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • February 2, 2000 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA-407: 223 NE 1st Avenue, Bankers Row, Contributing Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Gene Fisher, Owner. Consider a Renovation to Front Elevation which Includes Enclosing the Porch and Attached Garage. B. COA-404-Continuation: 112 NE 1st Avenue, Contributing Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. John Baccari, Owner. Consider a Change of Siding Material from Horizontal Wood Clapboard to Vertical Batten and Board for the Previously Approved Addition to the North Elevation. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff V. ADJOURN Pat Cayce Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: FEBRUARY 10, 2000 FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT AST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: Bodker, Dave MAILING ADDRESS [X]CITY []COUNTY []OTHER LOCAL AGENCY []STATE 801 NW 2nd Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33444 CITY COUNTY Delray Beach Palm Beach DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY February 16, 2000 NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, City of Delray Beach OR COMMITTEE Historic Preservation Board WHO MUST FILE FORM 4 This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers,this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is prescribed for all other boards, i.e.those at the state level. 'ART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed. PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.1343(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes)by whom he is retained. In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: (a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is abstaining from voting;and (b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below. NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting. In such cases, however,the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made. I,the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on February 16.2000: (a) I abstained from voting on a matter which(check one): inured to my special private gain;or X inured to the special gain of Steve Cohen, by whom I am retained. (b) The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as II s: COA 343, Pre-Application for the Cohen Office Building, 8 NW 1 sr treet. 1 am the L d cape Arc'itect for this project. February 16, 2000 " Date Filed Signat re Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART B VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom is retained is required to disclose the nature of is interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs. I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclosure that on , 19 (a) I voted on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retaine (b) The measure on which I voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Date Filed Signature Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. this form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 11.317(1983), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE ORE MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL C" SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENAL NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 2000 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Hurlbut, Shane Ames, Dave Bodker (arrived 6:05), Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott MEMBERS ABSENT: Tony Keller, John Johnson STAFF PRESENT: Pat Cayce, Diana Mund II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of February 2, 2000 were before the Board for consideration. Mr. Ames moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 4-0. Mrs. Cayce asked the Board to amend the agenda to add III.C. Steve Cohen Office Building for a Pre-Application. The Board was of the consensus to do so. At this point on the agenda Mr. Bodker arrived at the meeting. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 407: 223 NE 1st Avenue, Bankers Row, Contributing Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Gene Fisher, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering renovation to the front façade of a contributing single family Mackie Cottage. Prior to the meeting the applicant decided not to enclose the original porch. A new front elevation was presented to the Board showing the enclosed garage and open porch. The windows of the enclosed garage will be wood. The applicant stated that the Building Department would not approve the proposed batten and board shutters for hurricane protection purposes. Mr. Fisher plans to use removable metal or plywood panels, which will be installed during hurricanes. The operable batten and board shutters will be installed as presented. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 407 for the conversion of the garage to living area as presented, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E). B. COA 404-Continuation: 112 NE 1st Avenue, Contributing Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. John Baccari, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a change of siding material from horizontal wood clapboard to vertical batten and board for the previously approved addition to the north elevation. Mrs. Cayce informed the Board that the applicant has withdrawn his application. At this point on the agenda Mr. Bodker stepped down from the Board. C. COA 343 Pre-Application: Steve Cohen Office Building, 8 NW 1st Street, Old School Square Historic District. Steve Cohen, Manimal Land Company, Owner; Randall or Gary Stofft, Architect/Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of comment and direction with respect to the site plan, design elements and elevations for the construction of a 9,300 sq.ft. two story office building. The Board felt that the massing of the building was nicely broken up and suggested the possibility of raising the tower several feet. They liked the concept of the building being raised several steps above ground to create the front porch. The Board will support a variance to allow the porch to encroach into the front setback for a distance of 5'. They suggested using clapboard for the second floor and the applicants stated that they would consider this and possibly submit an alternate elevation. The shutters will not be operable but will appear so by being offset from the wall with appropriate hardware installed. The Board approved of the reconfiguration of the building to allow the long side of the structure to face NW 1s Avenue, with the on-site parking lot to be located to the east of the building. The Board will support a waiver from the required 5' landscape strip on the east side of the parking lot. It was suggested that a walkway be constructed from the CRA parking lot to the south to the subject property. As the area between the south property line and the abutting CRA parking lot is heavily landscaped with trees and other plantings, they suggested that a waiver to reduce the landscape strip from 5' to 3' on the south side of the property could be supported. The waiver would allow 2 of the compact care spaces to be increased to standard width. In order to create a more residential look for NW 1st Street, they suggested that the driveway be reduced in width from 24' to 20'. -2- HPB Minutes 02/16/00 At this point on the agenda Mr. Bodker returned to the Board. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives Sandy Jamison, Del-Ida Park Historic District, asked the Board to support his homeowners association in asking the City to make changes to the Seacrest/Del-Ida Park Redevelopment Plan, i.e. street lighting, parking, street plantings, and swales. The Board directed staff to write a letter asking the City to look into his concerns. B. Board Members Ms. Jamison inquired about the status of the proposed Atlantic Avenue Historic District. Mrs. Cayce stated that the DDA was paying for the designation report for the Atlantic Avenue & George Bush Blvd bridges. She also felt that the City had enough information on Veterans Park to have a designation report done on it for little additional cost. C. Staff Mrs. Cayce stated that the City has received the plaques for the Dr. Cason, S.D. Spady and Barbara Smith for the Greater Floridian 2000 awards. The Spady and Smith plaques had to be returned to the manufacturer due to shipping damage and misspelling. She recommends that publicity regarding the awards be postponed until all the plaques are available. She has also received a letter stating that the City has been awarded the Greater Floridian 2000 awards for Marshall Dewitt and C.Y. Byrd. Mrs. Cayce informed the Board that Mr. Silberstien would be at their March 1st meeting for a change in roof color. Mrs. Cayce informed the Board that they would be seeing the plans for the changes at the City Marina at the meeting of March 15, 2000. -3- HPB Minutes 02/16/00 V. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, Mr. Ames moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:25 P.M., seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0. The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 16, 2000, which were formally adopted and ap roved by the Board on March 1, 2000. //// Diana Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -4- HPB Minutes 02/16/00 HISTORK PR.ES;ER1/ ATION BOARD 'S FAT"' R E�P OR T- • Project Name: COA-407, Gene Fisher Project Location: 223 NE 1st Avenue, Bankers Row ITERC;B.El F:0=- The action requested of the Board is that of approval for changes to the front façade of a contributing single family Mackie Cottage, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E). The subject property is located on the east side of NE 1st Avenue, approximately 250' south of NE 3rd Street, within the Old School Square Historic Arts District. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal consists of enclosing the original inset front porch and attached one car garage for additional living space as follows: Porch The open inset porch (porch is under the main roof of the structure) will be enclosed along the west elevation with wood clapboard siding to match the siding on the structure. The 2 wood sash windows and front door of the house will be brought forward and used on the enclosing wall. If it is not possible to reuse the windows, replacement windows will be wood. Garage The one car garage will be enclosed with horizontal wood clapboard siding to match the siding on the rest of the building. Two wood sash windows will be centered on the garage enclosure wall. Shutters Batten and board shutters will be provided for hurricane protection for new and replacement windows. The shutters may be approved for code compliance by the Building Department. Floor elevation The floor elevation of the porch and garage will be raised to the same elevation as the existing structure. Meeting Date: February 16,2000 Agenda Item: Ill-A r ' HPB Staff Report COA-407—223 NE 1st Avenue Page 2 ANALYSIS The Bankers Row design guidelines state the following: "Character defining features of both the Mediterranean Revival Style and the Minimal Traditional Style Mackle Cottages shall be maintained and preserved where they currently exit. Mackle Cottage Porches Simple enclosure with insect screen is allowed. Fabric awnings, vertical fabric roll-down shades, and interior shading devices are allowed. Metal awnings shall be discouraged, but consideration given to historic types. Additional privacy obtained with lattice shall be discouraged but permitted. Further enclosure with solid panels (half wall or full height), windows, or other permanent type of exterior wall shall not be allowed." However, in 1991 when the Bankers Row development plan was adopted only the subject property had both the original garage opening and front porch still intact. Only one other house, 235 NE 1st Avenue, had its original garage opening and a partially enclosed front porch. On October 2, 1996 the HPB approved the enclosure of the partially enclosed porch and conversion of the garage to living area for 235 NE 1st Avenue. Of the 11 Mackle Cottages, 9 have garages that have been converted to living area and 4 have open porches. In view of the above, it appears that the guidelines require unrealistic goals with respect to interior living space. Not one owner who has done renovation work since 1991 when the guidelines were adopted, has asked to eliminate the existing interior living space by restoring garages and open porches. The cottage has a total floor area of 859.5 s.f., which is substandard living area under current codes and market conditions. Enclosing the porch (112 s.f.) and garage (220 s.f.) will only increase the living space by 332 s.f. (1,079.5 s.f. total), however it becomes more habitable. Economically, it makes sense to utilize the existing roofed area, and foundation as opposed to constructing a new addition. The garage is listed as a character-defining feature of the Mackle Cottage; however, the paragraph on garages discusses only the appropriate type of garage door to be installed and says nothing about prohibiting the enclosure of the space. Only 3 of the cottages had open garages at the time guidelines were written. As the guidelines are not as specific with respect to garages as they are with porches, staff suggests that it is appropriate to approve the garage enclosure. Further, the Bankers Row site plan indicates provision of parking as well as conversion of garages in anticipation of the buildings being converted to a commercial/office use. The plan indicates one parking space in the front yard and three parking spaces in the rear yard. Thus, parking will not be affected. The Bankers Row guidelines are specific with respect to the enclosure of porches. The HPB has only approved design changes to porches, which have already been enclosed, HPB Staff Report COA-407—223 NE 1st Avenue Page 3 or partially enclosed. If the Bankers Row property owners have no objection to enclosing the porch, the Board should consider approval based upon the fact that additional living space will be made available. If enclosure of the porch is approved, staff suggests that some form of entry shelter be provided for the front door. A canvas awning would be appropriate or construction of a small open entry. As the building is set back 30' from the front property line where 25' is required, there is adequate space to accommodate a porch without needing a variance. This is consistent with modification approved for 227 NE 1st Avenue, where the original porch was left intact but extended west by 5' and roofed with a canvas awning, thus providing an expanded outdoor living area while preserving the original inset porch. REVIEW BY OTHER S A courtesy notice including elevation plans was sent to all Bankers Row property owners. Their comments, if any, will be available at the meeting. <. ALTERN.ATI;VE .._ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented, with the condition that an entry shelter be provided. 4. Approve the garage enclosure. RECO`MM'END;ATION ` By Separate Motions: 1. Approve COA-407 for the conversion of the garage to living area as presented, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E). Board's Discretion for the following: ❑ Approve COA 407 for the enclosure of the front porch based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), with the following condition: That some form of front entrance shelter (roof or awning) be installed, and that the applicant return for its design review, or ❑ Deny COA-407 for the enclosure of the front porch, based upon its inconsistency with the Bankers Row Guidelines. S/pz/boards/hpb/coa-407-fisher . • • • • • • wn.w«. .I • • .L-L-J- -A- _A__L. _ _L. A_ 1__1_ I.1..A A A A A- _ A.- A. A A.. A A A.J.J-_A..1.1 A A A A A. �- 'x` �� _L_l 1. -� � �� 1 1 i -1 1 . 1 1_ L 1 1: 1. 1. 1 1.Li.L11 C iL�1i1111Ci �1��z�LAL�i1.L�Ci1. L • . Z1-1 i 1 a- i- i i- -I .r. i 1 S 1- '1 1 1 i r is. 711 \� IA : Ei� �Z -1I 1i 1.1E 1. :1 I LL 11� _1_1.Li LL1 A L- A i -,L 1 1. .l 1 c 1 i i 1 z 1 L z 1- C l (, 1 1 1 i 11 E-1r . i 1 .0 1- 1 1 1._l::r.L i 1: 1 _I.1. II :l C r 1.1.LrCri 11-f.Li.L - ---- - - ------- --.. - --------- __ • CC W 42 w • L Z w • Lti • EXISTING WEST • CLEVATUON1 w.,... C4 ww ITCAJ un 1/4,-I,-O, 17 10:999 99 aA-4.1' • . . • . ,, • . • . . • •• • ..• • . • • •. . • • .. • . . • . . . ,..•• ...' . . . .. . . , ••.'. . . / ----.--. . --- , . -- - --- • •A -I -A _A • 3r .... ... ............. .......,-.......... J._ tom 1111..A.1 A, mg me iseusiumommiumussurguominsumaluis_immissir Jugratirmlop alp.. iiii. Mew .1 1. 1 1111111B INIIIMMIIIIIMMiNSIIIIIIMININIMINIMMINNIMMINININI IMONNlism I Mx_ NI 3. ' mosisio•nuomownis ow limosiummanumemis sringemis• _alig Iffirmrsi, - ..t.. .1. T. ,....) imummisimmoriesininli usomisommoisisunimio_ meinsiumemmi__ um um .1 lisenuoizari ow illoUloilinlisMolooloolnisimmum ellielsoloilarlillill • NO .1•I I III '•k"a_ oguilisi merais, youposimspowirimag sivri mar_ . 11111_ x_916111. Milo iiimeimingelooleimilivilie mull -I...I. I.LI.: Ns elowlsiNaiiMillanloierelsoluillnliniriillealmaillniiini ormemen7 aim I .1 .1 1. .. Anglegaillialliumi illiallniviraliall lifirellareirlirillairlatillielliViallimulhoutirairmilire -ulninglinrisi 111.1 1.1 1.I.1 rt Nip oinielieuism liseinimmusivisompg. own __OP J. 1 1 .1' 17 v. 3_ _L. 11.1 1 1.. . "I:.1 111 J. T J.. '1 .1 ..1-.j .1- ow isiusr or morrirsomm .0 .1....1. mar 1 1 1 •• I .1_ 1 ri _i_3.: .1...a.J. I_ air iiMosi litionlimuirmovieumes wasaillormairigliaLmonms siouirilign .._.1-L me 1 1 1_1 1._1 J' -.1.1_3_3_111 J._J. 1. winewere emillOINIONINIUMBOINIIINIONIMINIO IIIMINIMININIIIIIIMINIIIIMPIIIMMOINIMOMI ON _a. Nom -1 . oftumwo me umgerporprormommosismosionommanoommesimengunimposeinmersommis NI IMMO ___C 1 1. _L 1. 1. .1 .I.:1 I 1 r. .1.. orusesio , yawls iiiiiilmillmilielosimisilielowlsoloulluissii ISIMMINelsoli .., L. t• L....L. .1 .1. 1 ._I .1 1 1. moo _ ' ---------- __- . .-- 11-1111. 111r- 111.Li il Fr • 1. I 1 .1 *1,1 .1:1 1' 1 1 I 1 1_,1 ..i_r1 -- -- ------ --1 I 1 1- "t• I I 7* 1 _ _---_,.--•=__-.--_-..............A______ II . -- cc . ._. . - .------ [I: •-- .. _ - - - _I. : ._ . --- __ . .. .. _____... •. -if.L__...-.,_.... . I I 1 i ------ - . j___ I III ____ Ti . _ __ . ___ ..____ _ UJ w ^ --r ---- / , t i ----- ._. .. ... 4 u • X 4 Inut - --- ------• - - - ------------ ••• Z 4 cd . • NEW WEST ELEVATIJON -6--- CAJ\ • Wm .warinz2iiiit 1/4"•-•-.-1 -0" 99 A-4.4S. :. ., S.. A _ _ — • A5.1 1 U .I. i ( . GARAGE cc 1 ---- 1---/----- / ----I w / , a: G iu PORCH B 1 6 A5.1 A5.1 sr: ltt . / A ..AA CAJ A E XISTING FLOOR R PLAN MINIM NT4..,J 19 10 1999 . A5.1 1/4"=1'-0.. 99 A-1.1. • • 11•TIMOM11 BY 5/6" x 6" LAG 5/8" x 6" LAG "J" SCREW J' SCREW — 4" GALV. BUTT —� I GALV GATE—►f •1it �— 4" GALV. BUTT — --7 --}•- GALV GATE v HINGE (TYPICAL) HINGE ASSY HINGE (TYPICAL) — -- — HINGE ASSY �— — — (TYPICAL) (TYPICAL) --- PAINTED FINISH --M-- PAINTED FINISH - TO BE APPLIED TO BE APPLIED TO ENTIRE ASSEMBLY TO ENTIRE ASSEMBLY 1 x 6 T & G — — 1 x 6 T & G V-GROVE (TYP) NOTE V-GROVE (TYP) NOTE DIMENSIONS OF DIMENSIONS OF cc SHUTTERS DEPENDENT SHUTTERS DEPENDENT W ON WINDOW UNIT ON WINDOW UNIT s N LL ( LL d 4" GALV. BUTT —"-I I • • • GALV GATE •t`• • • I 4" GALV. BUTT ^'�• GALV GATE o W x l •�: --t HINGE (TYPICAL) HINGE ASSY HINGE (TYPICAL) — -- —, HINGE ASSY 6 LL (TYPICAL) (TYPICAL) h CC 1- u 2 a w n o i i o K e 5 K N W o 1PPOLD FOLDING SHUTTER PLAN SHUTTER PLAN OIWA9 . CAJ MAT►01/35/2000 MOAu •9a NI. 99 1-1 .. . . . . . . .. . . .. ,. .. ..'i' 1101910.69 99 ' 1..1 i .1. .1. 1 .1_1 x 1--L.L '1_ 1_.1__ L 1 A r A 1 L 1 1 1 A r L 1L A 1_ LL : 1 L1. A: r L1:.A CLL L4 . A L I f�1_ r AAz1 . E. 1_ L_ C L L 1 '``L' A A. I. rAr .LC [ L:A:A:rA:A1:L:-L 1 I r r 1 r A .1...C .L J .L .A A. 'A A A A A A A L A IAlAA. AA. AA: rr rrAA .1AA111111LAALAAAA — A A 1. A :A- A- A r .t A A A l' .A .r r .0 ' ' AL 1 7A A A A r L I. A A�/.� — - — 1_ — -- — - - — : . . E.1' A E 1 1. 1 L1 1 -Z.r'Jl 1 A -- — -- — — - — L 11 1..1. T. A .A_J. 1 _ 1.1:...E _ - A L. ALLr - 1 -- -- -.-- -- - - -- ELA1 i1 ArA1 J. •1 et .____ _.____ Y , -_._ - _-_- ___-_--___-_ _-_ i_-._ ______ • , -r-i---r----. . ii-1 7 ir--- • . ___ _ ____ _..__ _ _ _. " II ii.-. ---- --- - — — — XISTING SIDING - - -- -- �- T C SUB IncCi II IIS_ __ — - -- — — = -- -- I I ® .IFILOOORI I'OIST 11 II Z T & G SUB FLOORING -- - -- I - 41OC 'L--Ji iI-1:---- CI i e' .. ----.. -. ..--- P.T.- 16" O.C. — - _ • __ _ — — FLOOR JOISTS , _ PORC�i FLOOR CRETE 2 4 i _ — - u P.T. SLEEPERS '1'I • 1A\A2 1LS%Vkaik•WAWA rielMA w`awwtiw'dw'w'•Weinrefeli i ........+5•.......•..............., .❖J.!.•.•.. 2 2 o .'�� EXISTING FOUNDATION �e' �!%" L�Ir'\~�� U V ..�A.�A.�. 9Y�11 9T CAJ c • SEECTOOO M a—a ".-CA J 1/4"=1'-0" J9i 1 4 -1'.0 99 A-5.I • ----) •••• . . -- . ..... . .........• ........... • / V. /ST A ✓ �/ Y V 30.3 - ZO' .�A viNG l . t:.....c . ..• f• M/LC.Aw v/NG m71 - • , or SND NN ;., 5 S�CO/VC. . PY.AL A' 5 5!_ ✓. -- - -- - — -') 0./2-- . c.. o.s' • ;." o be) o III Yo° ..1\-)f...-,--„. .. . p. /STO.QY �- p ` '1^ ` '� FRAME I 'W''.i... •�'` .c. . ' 3-6.e. i.. Cam/ '• -..)c.r;.:,• , )0 kh; \ \ c:5, 1 :s..i",.'...--.-'1'.- :::::•-:•••••••:::::::...-.:1::':-..-..:::-.:::-..:.-..:,.;.... Ni a.Y n /S -0,7V N: :� Q c.a.s. o, r.�` °e. aLo�_ 0; •`••.c- - _ ; 2s.0• ' 9.1. . - -- --.- -c— --- ! ---1 O— r—s-f-/4)- Jij - = GEYG- /6' �T—k loEG- 2 trry If.'AY//✓G — 7 .S/.O Ti/.r$ - � 0,C 47 FLO C/ N OF LO .c'iYBNSG/7P� Cff aJPD✓T�Y2aFSiE'EF ✓O,FPTOT28, SAt3O/YC/ UOTYFC4 ��fZ•��.•04/P�4 • y: � P�QEf�i4i?EO F17.P.• R.4YMOA0 ,''c,<-ER • Dwi!'G/HA.P'9' I s uc /'�zp' ,PLAT toot Nis. // r�oF No- /Z ' EK': . O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC. . _ - r ENGINEERS — LAND SURVEYORS --DRAY REACH FLORIDA BOYNTON BEA'H • li ;_ 11 B7:CERTIFT thot the plat shown hereon it a true and correct representation of a sur..r • ! vnd.r mr Direction,and shot sold Carver is accurate to the best d m knowled a and brt..I. �� "1 un�tf ef}serwitt shown,then.ore no.visible encr rate to tt. J r D Regisl d land Su r.•yo. j 'rer____r"'' '• Florid rrt Fcale No. n,'-:/.: I ... -•�1-:',--�s•�Voi z7/4,i PAGE NO.�� ' ' LLI ' ' � L LIiH ) �CII _ LAKE IDA ROAD (N.W. 4TH ST.) N.E. � 4TH ST. _ POST — CASON OFFICE - - METHODIST — CHURCH W _ D Z - - — W > Q- -� lii> > ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q —I — — N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. MI _ 3RD ST. ui ¢ui ¢ III ME >- - MilV — CITY r....1111I z a ._ ATTORNEY I ^ N "' —= o BUILDING I = = z_ r 7 Eli Ili MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE (N.W. 2ND ST.) N.E. 2ND ST. 0 u) Z r ' 1111 N 0 3 I— > . LLi o '¢ ' • Z v ¢ LJ Z 3 a I . Z CITY a a HALL cn z w J I N.W. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. _ I 3 z x IF 3 3 COMMUNITY w w Z z CENTER z z ileTENNIS OLD STADIUM l I SCHOOL J SQUARE I I z ATLANTIC AVENUE 11 (1 a1 1wiii a > ¢ r 7 7 N _ if> :Li _L7_ er 3 _W JILLi In In N In— in vi N--iimr- FISHER PROPERTY A,I CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL -223 N.E. 1ST AVENUE- PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM294 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1I11I1I1I11 11 1 1 1111 1 1 1111 ill 11111111' 111I1L1IlIlI1111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 111111111111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111I1111111111111I1I1111111111111I1111111111111111111111111 111I1I1I1111I1 J11I1I111I1I1I11I11II11I1IIII1II11I11111111I111I1I1I11i 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1_11111111111111111111111111111 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TTT TTTTT TT T TTTT T � ._�� 0 CAI n•11311 Avul3a 3 3 a ►- •aw a �^ mail 4 NEW WEST ELEVATION 1/4"=1'-0" a • ti, MEMORANDUM DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 1000 TO: HPB MEMBERS FROM: PAT CAYCE Item III-B has been pulled from the agenda. Mr. Baccari requested the change to batten and board, as he was unable to match the existing clapboard. He was able to find a match and is withdrawing the material change request. S February 15, 2000 Historic Preservation Board City of Delray Beach 100 N.W. 1st. Avenue Delray Beach, Fl 33444 Dear Board Members: About six months ago, I asked the Historic Preservation Board to lend their assistance regarding matters of the "Seacrest/Del Ida Project". Mr. John Johnson requested that I submit any such request in writing. Del Ida Neighborhood Association had several meetings with city staff, during which time we were told that the city would do the following: 1. Meetings were to be held with the residents regarding Swale Area improvements, which would include any special conditions, such as unique parking requirements and drainage problems. 2. That the city staff would hold meetings, block by block, to discuss the landscaping designs and what design features they wanted included in the plan, that affected their street. After reviewing the drawings, and subsequent discussions with the Engineering Department, several problems have become apparent: 1. Duplexes in the project area are to be given a concrete parking aprons. They measure 41' Wide x 23' Deep, which includes a 5' landscape island. (See attached drawing)only one duplex is shown on the drawing in Del Ida Neighborhood section of the plan, yet there are numerous duplexes in the area. As you drive up and down the streets, you see that"One Size Fits All" solution to the parking problem does not work in a"Historic District". Most lots are 50' x 120', with 50' Rights of Way. Some building are closer to the street than others, some have more space to one side of the lot than on the opposite side. In short, the special and unique conditions have not been addressed or considered. 2. As this is an old and well-established area,property owners don't need more trees on their property. The trees were supposed to be planted in the swale area, to provide a"Tree Canopy" effect between the street and sidewalk, as most residents envisioned. As it is now,trees shown on the Seacrest/Del Ida plan are to be selected from the list on the cover sheet by the individual property owner, and installed on the property owners' property. This does not provide any landscaping continuity from block to block. The term"Swale Improvements"is not defined anywhere, and could mean almost anything. At one time, there was talk of recessing the swale area. If this idea were to be implemented, off street parking problems would be further complicated. The matter of"Lighting" for the district has been left up to the individual homeowner,to voluntary install an 8-foot post light on their property. At an out of pocket expense of$250 each,not including installation, reception to this idea has not been overly enthusiastically received by the residents. So it looks like a real solution to our lighting problem is once again going to be ignored. In short, this plan has far too many flaws. It becomes apparent that this was a rush job. Del Ida Historic District deserves better than this. I hope you will help us. Cecil • . Jamison, Pre• dent- Del Ida eighbor Asso ation 5 5 North Swin n Avenue b elray Beach, 133444-3955 Cc: Pat Cayce Historic Preservation Board Members A \ 11[YI . �t M CENTER LINE OF STREET (50' RIGHT OF WAY) [ 41'-0" / 5-0" 18'-0" / / / • (.---- \ 1 dr i,-) 0 2 0 U. • F- O W CC M 3 i CC d w Z Z C LL re < 0 w u 0. 0 LAND I iti a W W ECTED BY 0 J isC. u ¢ i\IER-TO BE a C W o SROPERTY O AWN" CAJ CHECKED WA CAJ DAM 02/16/2000 Lfla APRON �W J NpNO. SHOWN 99 I II /