Loading...
HPB-02-21-01 2/21 /01 REVISED v = � cr t44 r OS AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: February 21 , 2001 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • February 7, 2001 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA 430-Continuation: Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, Lots 20, 21 & 22, Block 69, to be Located on the West Side of SE 1st Avenue. Approximately 250 Feet South of E. Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Michael Weiner, Authorized Agent. Consider Design Elements Associated with the Elevations and Landscape Plan. B. COA 431-Continuation: 310 NE 1st Avenue, Contributing Minimal Traditional Style Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. David & Kristen Conti, Owners. Consider a Change in the Exterior Accent Paint Color, Lattice and Windows. C. COA 432: 275 N. Swinton Avenue, Contributing Mediterranean Revival Style Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Cliff Jagger, Owner. Consider a Change in the Exterior Paint Colors. HPB Agenda February 21, 2001 Meeting Page 2 D. COA-346: Rectory Park, 20 W. Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Aeacus Real Estate Limited Partnership, Owner. Pending City Commission action of February 20, 2001, reconsideration of the Historic Preservation Board's action of February 7, 2001 regarding a Class II Site Plan Modification to modify the approved parking layout on Lots 3, 4 & 11 and incorporating the parking lot on Lot 5 into the project through a Unity of Title. E. Pre-Application: Elizabeth's on 7th, 9 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District. Presented by Scott Pape, Planner City of Delray Beach. Provide Comments and Direction for Proposed Elevation Changes, No Formal Action is Required. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff V. ADJOURN • 1 - t ( Mic elle Hoyland Planner POSTED ON: February 15, 2001 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2001 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Vice-Chairperson at 6:10 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice-Chairperson Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott, Shane Ames, Donnamarie Sloan, Rhonda Sexton MEMBERS ABSENT: Tony Keller, Dave Bodker STAFF PRESENT: Michelle Hoyland, Diana Mund II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of February 7, 2001 were before the Board for consideration. Ms. McDermott moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ames and passed 5-0. Ms. Mund asked the Board to amend the agenda to add Item IV.A. The Board was of the consensus to do so. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 430-Continuation: Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, Lots 20, 21 & 22, Block 69, to be Located on the West Side of SE 1st Avenue. Approximately 250 Feet South of E. Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Michael Weiner, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering Design Elements associated with the Elevations and Landscape Plan. Ms. Hoyland stated that though Mr. Bodker was unable to attend the meeting he did review the staff report and plans and faxed over his comments. Ms. Hoyland then read the letter for the record. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve the Design Elements for COA 430-Continuation based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.6.18 and 4.5.1(E), with the following conditions: 1. That a railing be provided internal to the building to separate the pedestrian walkway from the drive aisle; 2. ,That the top of the parapet located to the west of the west tower has the same architectural detail on both sides of the parapet; and, 3. That a double wide pedestrian entrance gate be provided and that it remain open. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 5-0 to approve the Landscape Plan for COA 430-Continuation as presented, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16. B. COA 431-Continuation: 310 NE 1st Avenue, Contributing Minimal Traditional Style Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. David & Christine Conti, Owners. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a change in the exterior accent paint color, lattice and windows. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 431-Continuation based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), as follows: 1. The Yellow Gold accent color as presented; 2. The white aluminum single hung windows as presented; 3. The lattice porch railing as presented; and, 4. That the lattice on the gable over the porch is to be returned to the original style. C. COA 432: 275 N. Swinton Avenue, Contributing Mediterranean Revival Style Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Cliff Jagger, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a change in the exterior paint colors. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 4-1 (Jamison dissenting) to approve COA 432 for the exterior accent colors as presented, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E). D. COA 346: Rectory Park, 20 W. Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Aeacus Real Estate Limited Partnership, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of reconsideration of the Board's action of February 7, 2001 regarding a Class II Site Plan Modification to modify the approved parking layout on Lots 3, 4 & 11 and incorporating the parking lot on Lot 5 into the project through a Unity of Title. -2- HPB Minutes 2/21/01 As the City Commission approve COA 346 at their February 20, 2001 meeting it was not necessary for the Board to act on this item. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to remove COA 346 from the agenda. E. Pre-Application: Elizabeth's on 7th, 9 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is to provide comments and direction for proposed elevation changes, no formal action is required. The Board was informed that the existing hair salon would be converted into a restaurant. The main alteration to the structure includes enclosure of the existing porch on the north elevation and an addition on the east elevation, which is to accommodate refrigerators and a cooler. The applicant indicated that the following elements (which were not depicted on the plans) would be incorporated into the modification: • Vertical spindles rather than horizontal on all railings (existing and proposed). • A new entry awning that will take the character of the structures gable roof. The Board discussed the proposed elevations with the applicant and had the following recommendations: • • That the enclosure on the north elevation incorporate windows, the same type of window that already exists on this elevation. • That the columns on this elevation be retained. • That the handicap ramp utilize a 1:20 slope, in order to eliminate the need for railings. The Board felt that with the above modifications that the elevations could be supported. The Board also expressed some concern with respect to the parking for the restaurant and staff indicated that the parking configuration was still being finalized. IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. The action before the Board is that of having a time certain for ending their meetings. The Board expressed concerns after the late hour of the January 17th meeting that the late hour makes it difficult to give their full attention to agenda items. 10:00 pm would be the time certain for ending meetings. The Board would of course finish the item they were acting on when the time certain came about, then continue the remaining agenda -3- HPB Minutes 2/21/01 times to a special meeting to be determined at that time. In the event the Board felt they could finish the remaining agenda items after 10:00 pm (i.e. 1 or 2 small items) they would have the option to do so. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to make 10:00 pm as a time certain for ending Historic Preservation Board meetings, with any remaining items continued to a special meeting. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None B. Board Members None C. Staff None VI. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:30 P.M. The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 21, 2001, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on March 21, 2001. XL)// Diana Mund / If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -4- HPB Minutes 2/21/01 Agent: Michael Wiener Project Name: Municipal Parking Garage— Block 69 Project Location: The subject property is located on the west side of SE 1st Avenue, approximately 225' north of SE 1st Street. 11'CI�A S FRC Tt-IRt1flRfl L „` .�pP:! •,cl i..l ,.� ; . - .,. « i.Air,..= ..,Fse',.FJ n-s ��: . The action before the Board is approval of COA-430, which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage: ❑ Landscape Plan; and ❑ Architectural Elevations. BACKGROUND I At its meeting of January 17, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board approved the site plan and associated variance and demolition requests for the construction of a 207 space municipal parking garage on Block 69. The associated landscape plan and architectural elevations were continued based on a concern with the proposed architectural style of the building and certain species of plant material. I DESIGN ELEMENTS The original elevations had design elements that were characteristic of Italian Renaissance. The Board felt that this style was not in keeping with the historic nature of the district. The revised elevations are characteristic of the Mediterranean Revival style. This is supported by the addition of a barrel tile roof, stucco walls that contain tile insets, grillwork, arched windows, etc. Along the east (front) and west (rear) elevations, window openings are provided. Along the north and south sides where a zero setback is proposed there are no openings, however, the fagade is scored to give an illusion of windows. Decorative grillwork will also be provided on these elevations. The grillwork will be recessed so there will be no encroachment onto the adjacent properties. Architectural features provided along the front and rear elevations contain square windows and arched windows. Some of the windows have a shed style awing while others have a barrel style. Decorative grillwork is provided over some of the windows. Faux windows with tile insets and grillwork are proposed on the stairwell facades. The stair towers sills also contain curved balconies with faux French doors. A wood trellis supported by cast stone columns is proposed between the stair towers. Other details include decorative light fixtures, wood outriggers, clay piping and faux vents. The Meeting Date: February 21,2001 Agenda Item: III.A. SPRAB Staff Report r # Municipal Parking Garage—Block 69 Page 2 proposed colors of the building are to be a combination of yellow, buff, moss green with grayish-blue awnings. A terra cotta color is proposed for the barrel tile roof. Scale of Building: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(7), the construction of new buildings or structures shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color and location of adjoining sites. The property to the north is under utilized. Development standards would allow a maximum height of 48', which could result in a structure equal to or greater in proportion and mass than this proposal. Located in the immediate-vicinity of the subject property is the 48' high GRIP building, the 32' high Masonic Lodge building, and the approved Block 77 development having a height of 58'. The parking garage will have a height of 38' with the towers extending to 48' which is either similar or lesser in scale and massing than surrounding buildings to the north and east. This structure while greater in mass and size than the adjacent uses to the south and west, it will act as a transition between structures to the north and east. As discussed in the original report, the applicant has gone to great lengths to provide varied building materials and textures, which enhances compatibility with adjacent properties. The revised architectural elevations are Mediterranean Revival in nature, and provide for a better overall balance of the building in terms of the scale, which enhances its compatibility within the Historic District. Visual Compatibility: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), all improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of height, front façade proportions, window openings, rhythm of solids to voids, rhythm of buildings on streets, rhythm of entrance and porch projections, materials, texture, color, roof shapes, walls of continuity, scale of building. As discussed in the original report and above, in order to increase the visual compatibility of the building, great strides have been made to create a building design that is compatibility with its surrounding environment. The architectural design of the - garage with Mediterranean Revival elements, different forms (projections in stair wells and flat walls), textures (stucco walls and wood pergola), different materials (stucco, tile, canvass awnings, aluminum railings), and varied roof heights all help to increase the continuity with the existing and proposed structures in the area. Based on the above, a positive finding can be made to LDR Section 4.5.1(E). LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS The Board noted concerns with the original submittal with respect to the type of palm species being utilized at the corners of the buildings, which included Sabal Palms and Winin Palms. The plans have been revised to provide Alexander Palms and Washingtonia Palms, which helps to better frame the building. The balance of the plant • j SPRAB Staff Report Municipal Parking Garage—Block 69 Page 3 palette remains the same as previously submitted. Along SE 1st Avenue, the vertical elements include Alexander Palms, Glaucous Cassia, Pigeon Plum, Washingtonia Palm and Pigmy Date Palms. Ground covers include Green Shell Ginger, Cocoplum, Philodendron, Zanadu, Croton, and Bougainvillea. This same palette of plant materials is to be provided along the west elevation. In order to maximize Xeriscape principals, no sod is proposed for this development. Therefore, the intent of the landscape ordinance is met. "' O`N'CLUS'1QN The revised architectural plans meet the intent of the Board's concern by providing an architectural style (Mediterranean Revival) that is more compatible with the character of the historic district. Further, the proposed revisions to the landscape palette meet the Boards concerns relating to the original landscape plan. AL"TERi AT`IVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve COA-430 and the associated landscape plan and design elements for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.6.16, 4.6.18, and 4.5.1(E) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. C. Deny COA-417 and the associated landscape plan, and design elements for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, with reasons stated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION' By Separate Motions: Design Elements: Approve COA-430 and the associated design elements for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, based on positive findings with respect to Sections 4.6.18 and Section 4.5.1(E) of the Land Development Regulations. Landscape Plan: Approve COA-430 and the associated landscape plan for Block 69 Municipal Parking Garage, based on positive findings with respect to Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations. Attachments: Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Building Elevations 16 ALLEY a` Perez I 51kG1a14 a.�11a•4l Ltw I I 1 t v e t'- OLI.-1a0 .Lmm emir 011.-e,.a p e OLL op dq�!! Design. 11 .G GILL I.w 11 13 *IL 1tf0 tl • ♦ ..wrw V-1••v1n +f//////A MP OP P •101 4 ` `Y 'A I 0 :••IIOrWN a ITSYtYlli I x.c Iow A.•.. E p p `� © O® LH4 OkM1ILM 5 ` COm l 1 fRVM) ... 1 Q Al j • O OI 1 f1 tC^f p 44 e ; ,N5.fl •1ii(o o.H 1r•11 112M5 " • Nt.I. SS1.al , 4 BLOCK 69 .. BLOCK 67 • t Ir.lr rn<Ina 4 e~© 0 f LM.d.) E L0117 LOT 73 ��© p i © p xG p i 1 kr1?MIME 'II /111,111 © p• • 5 f<iILLM p „-, f i p Yt pp , k 1 XL r14k� •r I ! p '�lV///,I ruOVlr-o••p MITIK,w4-r.1N1t1 (.� 1�t p ! ! /I I , t 0n.-+oo y� s// lLl.oa tllll r�� !{!IC 0¢.ILm !n,Ile I 11111111 - IIIIIIIII! ma-Le I �:IlIII�► Ito:, .1 \!n 1<» r a D' 0 Er, o I „.. 1 F-11 v-r k-. } k•r .• Ir-r .... I, p• n I c-r I NW I „-< I r.< w. r � 0 � 111.11. I.La•LkH 11. _ `�• BASEMENT LEVEL SECOND LEVEL u4c 0e•i-c S.E.Ill AVENUE ut:the•r-o• GROUND LEVEL G 11,1010 Rm.LP.) ■01111 n•) 1t4u Ih:M.I„,„ 0 U.Da 1...... ... Olt.NJ -'---'---'------ ---- 417171.111':� , Il 0 rt.fIM w 13 OIL)lro 1 _.__---._._.-____.-.--_- -.___, __._. ,-_-�— RI.V VA..Ir11 1 ?KO 1•Ir-1'<I.311 "_y/Y-E1.1/7 1I KRIM< t_A® 0 [ 11111r11H y© p *IL Ixlo f10A35 a y©p Nl.11d flues - lx ra-v1�• t. —ii—iar.e.ui • ,: _1 u p _. l[siTAIC RSrrS-. — _IK14-T1R[PCl['rS--__—7(-MSTIf-P4(IIICRws� FLOOR „0 p I 1 1II11< *© p'� 1 nH _ _ ._-__ ____ . E MULE flee? ' I A011 43/!Yid Mel m 1= m o •i .I _ --- - a In lw..lYY. ;:. 71 .,,,,,< p _— _ - _ __ .Y.I vo.opl . .,,.. Oa Ile p;{oil MINI! 0n.ne -'--'-'--'-'--'-'--- ! --------._._._.-- plICITHD LEVEL 1 \eaxle r FOURTH LEVEL �� en Du. FRAMING PLAN 1 9 I ----- • --' S I T E D A T A ' VA(:IAI`-I'-o• eALI lhr.I a dNt,1p`•1 e •,II 1GYt • -- • • Y1xl UAL 1 41 VMS 17,'k 5/l lr, r I V LaC4 I' Y '11 •VLW inn 1 119wL1 1r,1•111. t9'1Y IOIfl A •Hma LLHl: 19.5 1L.IA tr, L rip nounDfal lei.le H MO LK SiW I•Y 1.1 fdaLRO[ �~.}� it•tt I.-451 /. •Ixxp l[Hl: 11 YrfI1 1>,)S11r. I.H11.41d11u'CL 40H x.G YML♦xo ok<II1'-1 IX �f OA LdC kill •10.i1M 1L41: 11 9M{ Ig11.1 Lr, 1 11•t 51k1Yk MO 40 H'111, R 414LLo lI 41 ROl1 r-11/.• 1 CAW/9.LxIC I(gfl IS 1T-e'10 im d S1M 1MIL I•ea<4L YAM/.+<) q. A21n •w14: IP 9M1 d,1„sr, Low. .,V' /•TL •xG 9M5: 711Mt •r10•Ma YMf: ID?Y1dt DETAIL i ' . , ' . . • i;/,',0,•,;.; ,.';',' ,'. kr4iilidy,i; ',.•,, , .2,,„;,., .,. INI I' • ' •-• 1 • , .: i i 1:1!'ois ,..:.; ,,,,,;,, . . ; . . . lo -4,, ' 1.1.11 INN pomp paw 1,11.4 0,04 mailml % t N f 1.•Let%.* —in erwil.) .-----:-.. mom ." % -'" .... .._..somirdwoomminsiminsommillVimma..=--_.-.. -_r_- '7•a..... , ., , „ , • `I 1 ' ' ••• olti' 'um** * 1-11Lisal'' ''• • Mi --W. . - ,'• '.'"'•i I 1--—Tr7 fih .DIN HD 101111 i•:•::.:::::i!i: —1:-----M---- i::•:,:•:':ii:: ; a ,g, ,A, _ ,_1n0C=1:=r011 11.7:71-. • 1 1 1; /•Aii:,•-r.!1_7,_,, ii , pig! II • 1/ ‘ ----.-----__ __•••• cc .. ii, I,,,: ..i*. . , ......::. al 0 L3 0 Ei •- - --a. =77 I II c:214\.\\_1- --"Tti. 11011111i I 111 mora...... ' A ' ori -SW Nii M ---- - .-.- t.........11 j Ilajtiltl , tW4 ti,I'l• ,I 1,11 .Iliqi. r. , ,) El.....-4.7,:trar.;1....... c' it! ,t; ...itt'' on inr tws.4 DE AS T liiyA TION . ' • '11'.'.'i• ,,) 4i. 'I I. '- '•••Iiii4,,, !,A ', is.. A . ..- 1)- • -•-• i•,.. .,0 ,1;•., . .1,,... • • ......„-....,..... ,I. 1111 .•,, i ,..f ri,"!.: ,....•,.,c. ,' ',4 If':1- •;,, -',., = d",2i0 ':',.;44.' • t ,,?,to.rii•,;.;.,• !, ‘,, 1/4c;0 ;t1.-• ; ....1,.i, • , 11 ,:'.0i',,,"..;t•"'', ' } V.7, if's'",•,,!.:::o.li _. ,,r' 4;iir,r't'l'i't• '',1.- ... ' 'tt, itflik,,fii,-I'''..'''.1i•'.'. . -- ' COI-1 ' • i ,,,i;:c,i,„.,,. •14s,..,,4,.„ ., i.„.„,,,,;0$14.01.z,, , 1=7 — „ •,,,""' . --,--_—_--, t ''.',J4i,:r:',',r.i.1.,Z;('''.,•:,:r.,,,. .87,711t.... • . • 1 1 .k'tt1'6vi'i,ig'.,y tOi1740:.q:0,11W,',0:y„,.',.,:•,.A',.:,,`,-,.f'i.i,',1,t 1.;.i,.lt 9fA'?,•,it•(.t r.'.,*,,.?i',.,..i..1:,f;1:j.i i t,,,,e?i.,I,:N;4,,1,,il.I,l,iN,.i,i:,T:•p.,r,,.`,i„,t,.1q4l.'.„2 li'":,..t:i i.i_k!...s•'. ,r.-I.;.:;_'—•n, * r, '•-- M_ 0ilp p NMLIINI EI lM111i1-11•i1I1.11 4 . mDioi44 ,tt, . 161r_ . 1ro - , ° 11 . .li_ i / 445— i 1[ A , . 0 y Ilems, , ......, mk...1.remrif.'4 I e,; ...4.1 — —----------------- j 1.41. p1• t thr•Oi ,• •11,f n'. 'i. )r;-.4 1".;' .. .‘ iltil Z411qh.•t';',1....',!,,'-f - , i f . 8 .......,. , 1 - ,..,ii.v. ,,I.,,, .,..,,,,.1 ;:i!.,•,..•• ..-; •,1,11,....4?%,:pi,,i.,...,..•••••• ,. ..,,..• 4G).NOR TI I.flit VA PON (5WES,Ts.f, .5.VA DON • 4,01?,,4 If;;4'. ;'tj' 1 t,,'''!,it'' • '•. I • liqa ri 1.:7.11::„4! !• . , .•., •• _ •'‘• •',. 1•.,'f.,• •:''' "fi t •''.';'• ,i'.•;' • • 'V"•!1;'.'icl::•;,:;,,', Oiti.c,,. ,',. • . .04,•,,:i,.. .., ).1,.... .• . . 1. •‘/A-ii of . ,.. . ; i . , , . . . , '* 1iii.•,,,. '.,,,,,.!.-.),:•::.p ....i.:.;•;..,:.,;!;,,,.; . . . ,,,,,:;.;';••• . s i Perez Design �rra ra �`�� �� _—_ N. A�ONIT�0TU11■ . rn>t_ \. aM-nrtM / ro-7-1Y bV.Ml l4 Awv '' a I+Ot y�,Nm Design 1 Ov.WO �^ ,�•N l.til!!.!i-�ii.t lt!!.l t:!!.t!!.l iitt� ,-�.��' :444. 9,11*t* IIIII ,l�u 110. -mot.t. ,...lic,„.75__.,1, \ I :Q ' i;t.:111M.1 (0"-1V1.--_ \ * * -1-: 2;5 a 1-.= * ii iiii IN'02 :-.10 . k ........,____-".. 111 um .o nVaur nose rc j _-- C u rt une.. tIi arna„ L -- --- • FRONT ELEVATION r., -...,"--.-N..„...---.11 =0--- L— i , 1\..,0=M 0c 1[]M•I V.M R1-aAN ",'1....,>%..._.._._4".'..-.,'/-.,-.,r-,--_-m—"':.t".."a,.". • 1'Hv01 r COV.V 11a.1 aaauw �.r \ "0, E�11 l 0N1.I TryI a"�"'n� EXTERIOR .aiiia,--- }� sNun ELEVATIONS naiw �! �U 1 �••I , RNwI M.yn 1\ rtLA Iran.la[0 YM. A ,A--/// ..5 ..:� ". me9 i rout N-'+e pa„I__ L J — • • S S1="TION � ��J�-� L �'l b A309 r•� rA" 1 • • Perez Design NC 0' •e calnoTUOI FM.SUM 0 ,a--- wr°wb- I Y!t l.t=t tttt:,ltAll;~ew • r /.w. N, . �'t .....e.. w � • * --.l�v,ti l,s LI -141,77:2 111 !Wt. ,,,,.... MO L. 0.,� -- _� 1_ ... ... ... _ - ,W . ® ® i wi:a• m.n wm1 --3PbJt9a 7' 1,.,u I M U CO• o o 0.a--- •L ------------------------------------ -I S o m a ,. • I. • • • REAR ELEVATION • a rtw xmx • 0-'7.0---wr N,.Mu .ow r w sntmw,�\ !//// ,=�e,vgn r ac..wtl.w, �,� \\ • uRw� rl Irl ni[.... 0 LP El NMI w.-,� 1 r.nn -r WM-..w ____ \ �\ EXTENION v�� :�Q ELEYATIONB • m.m.N� -r wqx` ____ Y[Y 1 �-II7/�/mrzO W /re..[. A • W •....• • •xt. tnM,h ���1 ,. � W ICI �J� II ❑ Di al fol 01. -r.ge �nae w. I L J =NATION 1(Zbr2Q6! V r V T1Ol�t A301 FEB-21-01 WED 15 :34 DAVE BODKER LARCH.-'PLAN 407 276 3869 P. 02 dave bodker landscape architecture/planning inc. 75 n.e. sixth avenue, suite 209 delray beach, florida 33483 561_276.631 1•(fax) 561.276.3869 February y 21, 2v0 i Tony Keller, Chairman Historic Preservation Board City of Delray Beach 100 NW 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Re: Block 69, Municipal Parking Garage Dear Tony: Unfortunately, I cannot attend tonight's Historic Preservation Board meeting due to a conflict with a CAB meeting in Deerfield Beach. Below please find my review of the submitted project. I have reviewed the submittal package for Block 69, Municipal Parking Garage and have the following comments. 1. The architectural elevations are greatly improved from the previous submittal and are much more compatible with the downtown and this historic district. I think that the architect has done a good job of breaking up the elevation of this large structure. 2. In my opinion, the landscape plan compliments the architectural elevations and utilizes a nice variety of plant materials. The landscape plan has been revised addressing the comments from the previous meeting. However, there is a typographical error in the plant list. The plant symbolized "lAn should be Ilex palatka or Palatka Holly. I had a conversation with Grant Thornbrough today regarding this error to assure that I was interpreting it correctly. Mr. Thornbrough will bring corrected plans to the meeting tonight. incerelA Dave Bodker t S 'Xw 5 , i h �. .d`' fop✓+ �y �'-.' .';.✓ E f "c � 3-z^ a3 3�'. -�- ti, r� .a c, sys�, rs�.,* i��.� t i *'`�"'r'tc�yg.&'�3xs r µa y HISTORIC "PRESERVATIO`N BOARD ` " ,...._r....H....�-.�-xsro..z ��;..,...,.�.:>.;.e:,,..,...'..�.,;.a..�,a.,..��:.�,,.�,a..:.w.,.,,.aqa.._..__..,..>✓n...wsrr..�-;s,.2.,a.eva..<.�.r.».Fs�..,.etsi.T..i�...».a',.rsu".._,a,......_az's-3st,u�t'«as,.ri'c�:aa.' Project Name: COA-431-Continuation, David & Kristen Conti, Owners. Project Location: 310 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District -� � h ITEM BEFORETHE BQARD� �- The action requested of the Board is that of approval of COA-431 to allow a change in the exterior accent color, replacement of the porch rail and new single hung colonial style windows. BACKGROUND The subject property is located on the west side of NE 1st Avenue between NE 3rd Street and NE 4th Street (Lake Ida Road). The single family residence is minimal traditional in style and was constructed in 1939. The Historic Preservation Board approved a color change to the body (wedgewood gray) and shutters (dark blue) on February 7, 2001. However, the Board requested that the applicant return with the accent color to the next regularly scheduled meeting. The proposed changes include replacing the existing aluminum awning style windows with white aluminum single hung windows. The applicant is also proposing to replace the existing porch railing with lattice and to install lattice on the gable over the porch. The applicant is returning to the Board with the accent color, which is proposed to be a golden yellow. The accent color is to be painted on the facing of the proposed lattice work with the interior of the lattice to be painted white. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS „.- 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented. RE601VIMENDATICN Based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E), approve the change in windows, lattice and exterior accent color as presented. Meeting Date: February 21, 2001 Agenda Item: Il1.B. `# S xQSTAFFREPORt �STORICYPRESEKY IOIV BO i D , d ' ,� Project Name: COA-432, Cliff Jagger, Owner. Project Location: 275 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District The action requested of the Board is that of approval of COA-432 to allow a change in the exterior accent colors. BACKGROUND The subject property is located on southeast corner of N. Swinton Avenue and NE 3rd Street. The 1,500 sq. ft. single family, Mediterranean Revival residence was constructed in 1926 At its meeting of October 4, 1995, the Board approved COA-262 to relocate the structure from NW 1st Street to the southeast corner of N. Swinton Avenue and N.E. 3rd Street, Block 66. DESCRIPTIONIANALYSIS ° v The proposed changes include a change to the exterior accent colors. The single family residence is yellow with pale green trim and awnings. The applicant proposes to repaint the fascia and entry steps to pale lavender. Additionally the applicant the awnings are to be painted a coordinating periwinkle blue with a new paint specifically for the use of painting canvas. The body color, which is yellow, will remain. ALTPRNAT 'EAOTI • NS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented. Based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E), approve the change in the exterior accent colors as presented. Meeting Date: February 21, 2001 Agenda Item: III.C. '.� ;� ,� k�,_ �_ .M,E M,O:R�a►N,r© �'� „T_A��;F E�'`� RT�. ' ,.. ..� • - Applicant:Applicant: Aeasus Real Estate Limited Partnership Project Name: Rectory Park Project Location: Southwest corner of West Atlantic Avenue and South Swinton Avenue, within the Old School Square Historic Arts District. The action before the Board is a reconsideration of COA-346 associated with a Class II Site Plan Modification for the Rectory Park, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(b). At its meeting of February 7, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board denied the site plan modification request for Rectory Park which involved changing the layout of the parking lot including reconfiguration of the parking spaces in front of the Historic Rectory building and elimination of spaces on the south side of the new 3-story building. Overall the modifications resulted in a loss of 6 on-site parking spaces. To offset the loss of parking, a unity of title has been recorded incorporating an off-site parking lot (west of the development) with 14 additional spaces into the project. The Board denied the modification due to concerns with the proposed traffic circulation pattern for the parking lot. The applicant has appealed the Board's decision to the City Commission, which will hear the appeal at their February 20th meeting. Staff has met with the applicant to discuss following alternatives, which may address the Historic Preservation Board's concerns: 1. Striping the parking space at the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the Atlantic Avenue to serve as a turnaround area. 2. Providing a continuous pedestrian path from the mixed-use building to the parking lot west of the alley: 3. Except for the residents of the mixed-use building, leases will require tenants and their employees to park in the gated parking area west of the alley. They will be provided with remote controls for the gate. Attached is a copy of the modified site plan depicting items 1 and 2. While these changes will result in the elimination of two more spaces, they will be replaced in the parking lot to the west. By providing these changes, the main parking area will be available for customers and clients of the business as well as the residents. During the daytime, the spaces will be used primarily by customers and tenants as the residents are normally at work during this time period. This item has been scheduled for HPB action in case the City Commission remands the site plan modification to the Board for reconsideration. Meeting Date: February 21,2001 Agenda Item: III.D. HPB:Staff Report Rectory Park Class Il Srte Plan Modification` -'Page 2 . z � ..;RECzONn� M�M, D A Approve .COA-346 and associated Class II Site Plan Modification for Rectory Park, based upon positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide 3 copies of a revised Landscape Plan, consistent with the amended site plan and containing the required elements pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.3(C) Landscape Plans; and, 2. Prior to issuance of a CO (Certificate of Occupancy), the following items must be addressed: a) That the entire property be replatted including dedication of all required utility easements and rights-of-way, and the replat be recorded. b) Execution of a hold harmless agreement for dumpster located in utilities easement. 3. That the parking space at the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the Atlantic Avenue be striped as turnaround area. 4. That a continuous pedestrian path be provided from the mixed-use building to the parking lot west of the alley. 5. That a copy of the lease be submitted for staff review. 6. That 3 copies of the revised site plan be submitted reflecting the changes and that the site data be revised accordingly. Attachments: ▪ Reduced Site Plan • Letter from Applicant ao 02/16/2001 01.56` 5612762010 DHARMA PROPERTIES_ ._ PAGE 05 BALFOORT FINNVOLD ARCHITECTURE,,INC, FACSIMILE TO: Jeff Costello and Paul Dorling PHONE: FAX: PAGES INCLUDING COVER: DATE: February 16, 2001 RE: Rectory Park Apartments MEMO: Jeff Costello and Paul Dorling: Attached please find the revised pathways for Rectory Park for presentation at the City Commission on February 20, 2001: Per our meeting with you this morning, we are in agreement on the following items: The commercial leases shall be amended so that all employees of the Rectory Park tenants shall be provided with remote controls to access the employee parking lot to the west of the Rectory. The first space in the most western row of parking spaces shall be dedicated for a turn-around space. The pathway between the employee lot and the Rectory Park building has been revised to provide a continuous connection. In providing this we have lost an additional space in the overall parking count. REQUIRED SPACES= 26 SPACES PROVIDED SPACES= 33 SPACES RhanV\&LJL kyo Michelle Batfoort 255 Northeast 6 Avenue, Defray Beach, FL 33444 p 561.276 323B f 561.276.2010 License#AA0003252 email mbarcCcr�rnindsr�ring_com or afarc©mindsnrina.com 1 02/16/2001`, 01:56_ - -51612762010:'_ --" --, -_:'- ---•:- '.DHARMA PROPERTIES.--,- '' . - - - PAGE 13, .v ... _. . . _ . . . _. . _ . .. , .. . - ...MN\ • . I I •. • I I ... . . .' • . - .- . _ .. - • I / I I • • • . _..•" -... ....• ---• -__, / • . . I I C.....___.........t. -- - - . . I I I - I .=•=gA.."'°4 ... i .::::; --•••:-;;: , . •,._-.-. • _•,.-.- 11 It ! -- , .... Iliiiiiiiiti ... .7::::.i.;:-...'• AIMIW -,----..-:.•:,:-. .. ... g ._ .--...... :-..--:--: , ,•,==, ..,,-- ., ....''':. - • .. -- • • 11-...„.,. . .. t ...., ; .... . . 1 V.111 • t ' •. ..... " I . ' IS, . . ... • N1 • I. . . ' ' ' • . . . • , . . . . .. .. .. . .._... .=._ ....., =.1.-• • . . . . ---- . . • :...i. -• . , ____•!..._ 0 • • . ::„..=._..... -\._ .., . • . ! , i.• • • • -02/1612001 =01.56 5612762018 DHARMA PROPERTIES Pe,, 02 IOOZ 26 90�Eti 9t:pad t.Jj_, 6Mp•aseaJdb\NOISI/IJ SNINUVd\ldeLOL5\sioa.,id\._0 s _ — • • w . fit,. ,,,,„ ..,,,,, ..,...,,,,,B, `lI+, i 1 1 ..,......„ , ., 6 Tt.9 i.}0.eu • • ii.. v.^=r-•ter;.•^''=,ram ‘ in . . .riy".:if;;• .��� '..• , _ or-a- j M. b y _`— L z; • PEC-6.7E. d.4E CPACCe. Tz. P2-v+Q- LJ4c„bt..r4,7 3 1-Ane.lios n,4b 02/16/2001 01:56 5612762010 DHARMA PROPERTIES PAGE 03 • • • I 0: •- • • 1--:3 E:Ell ,e. ... i ) .p. co • . y • cn % rr) .{1 I- N to a -*%...\\ .:.-...-_-_-_" . .:.. .,I.—,ZZ j --'ti -...'. ..9� 04„0=,6 la SOdS b :1-%:: i ..0—,Z _ 1 1 :-Ii::::iii I II ' 9 �a or o ri E �. o \pr0jects\9707apt\PARKING AEVISIDN\APTbase dwa Fr.'i' Feb 16 13:06 49 2001_ f ti` - ,F.. ,� wd i � �, aya7'+f r 1 .�' F sr* q b . � :; 81,7 A F F M' f R,AA.:1 Dk ,; i4 , ....__,,,,.<,.-.r..—:.. :.w...r...�+.-,_,-.t,,, .z.. +.,..3.:...,i.;r..,.,}-.es,,w...s'�:s..ae...,z: .� ,t a.t:-2:..-..s .u`, .i,tzz`r'.z,:.:r,n"�« Project Name: Pre-Application, Elizabeth's on 7th Restaurant Project Agent: Arthur Brauer Project Location: 9 SE 7th Avenue, The Marina Historic District t,i ,: s , f ...A Tr ....:...-..'ss ti-, t,xoi:,,, o C .. 7g;_Axp"'.{�---,:, :......c.vs . ,, ...-,4,..., 1I - ,a y, 'vuyd.'J' `5. ,Iy. s 1Lmzs,. i V j V 1, .. 1..1 1.4 s/4 1`.. iJ b*s" `.74. o.,_...;:'A.,,.. ._ --'- ,._ ...__..s_.aax...$.J.,aw-. .,s-u,.,.w.a-U§:.c�.w�.._.��.'-=<-rs ..._.,..�.<.:_.xa.... :_.s_,,.�....,,._ �.k_.,wt_ _ .. ,..�a..n�.. ,w..�.,rn.:`ar rk _"II The action requested of the Board is to review the proposal and give comments and direction to the applicant. No formal action is required. :- B._ACKGRaUN:D ?u µ` %. ,._d„.�..,_„,-„ _,,_ �.....,.ad,'`K... s:,I,,,z ., ..b. __,, ._... -__,,.--.-,r.__ _ ._::. .a...:>. -_ sw., .y?'. -t. ...'�..'m',,va,. r ^' r- r The structure in question is located on the east side of SE 7th Avenue, approximately 4 90' south of E. Atlantic Avenue. The building was constructed in 1924 as a single family residence and was originally located adjacent to East Atlantic Avenue. In circa 1940, the building was relocated to its present location in order to allow the construction of the existing two-story mixed-use building along Atlantic Avenue, which was built in 1941. The first floor of the building has been utilized as a beauty salon and the second floor contains an apartment. PR9J`EDT1DES,yCRJP ti, . 4 ;, The applicant has submitted a site plan modification to enclose the 183 square foot covered porch on the north side of the building for use as a kitchen and maitre d' station. The proposal includes a 225-square foot storage room addition on the east side of the building. Modifications to the parking areas are proposed that will result in a decrease from 20 existing parking spaces to 17 spaces. The additional floor area requires one additional parking space, which results in a gross deficiency of four parking spaces. The Board is requested to review the proposed building elevation changes and provide comments and direction regarding the appropriateness of the design elements. Attachment: • Location Map • Site Plan Meeting Date: February 21, 2001 Agenda Item III-E N LOWRY STREET N.E. 1ST ST.l'ff id cc a > w > >- DELRAY a < VETERANS SUMMIT ATLANTIC PARK CONDO W PLAZA I-Li1 / Q BARR W Lai TERRACE w -�' Z z w CONDO Tr- ATLANTIC AVENUE I 1 11 r ` IIIII I WATERWAY EAST -:•=1n COMMERCIAL CONDO I_ a ¢—� I BAR o La) • Q ¢ 0- HARBOUR FE �_�_ CONDO 0 1111•1111111ME I r S.E. 1ST ST. MIRAMAR ST. BUD'S —� 3 Q / Z `f' Li ct L�i t.Li / ((fill — S.E. 2ND I ST. , INGRAHAM AVENUE } } / I 0 x Q Q I M • _ = n SEAGATE _ o 0 TOWERS —' _I -J - MN — ___, Q Q vNASSt U X X REE III . 0 I:sTT S.E. 3RD ST. > _.. • \ �^ 'BAY ST. 0 0 Z Z 0 0 m = i MUM H ,LANCER D CC 0 ' WAY v7 Z u; L..; L.; vi vi Cl) i N - - ELIZABETH'S ON 7TH il CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL 12-43-46-16-34-000-0090 PLANNING do ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM306- 1;" S'1'OI�AG l±I A.1�17I'1'.IO N '"�� ,!'' xi 14l) NEW 1=I/C RAMP ACCESS }F;'' ' ; �t , lp 1 n • r ite4 if'Y', • \ . .., ./ r...F.,c INAL-1..:: ct!"t..i,;. -o [0 ('.. tar )i AIM it/c Stc N• _ _ -- _ n VA) �I/c: 5 1-ALL E jI�A G` — ._ _� 'yr: , ,, ' ��� /T3 I.D x i' • E)_ • . \ 131.G 0 . • - _lo' - jyGItTMG�'►I f U t I� y I o I" I. {�CtST7No �S . grAiLps III • I t‘ x a^^i• LI�. IS7`. C - ■ ..tam— X7ING �, ry • ai �q ��,�.,, ,l)• r..Wsrll-) l Y. [ A7KING LO � i .(Irl ' �r, !ll l 1Jl . n - ,� P Z ::. v� n�z i'' of iZ t.l/G _— I (PTR '/ Dcs S()N4 c'e4c. 1 (�P t `— WNC�,. r •A• . . .. ,i — ° •� • l;LI7AlaL'I'1I'S • ,/ Q ,1f. " ' • . 1i. t ';', .. •.• . ..,:. ..., 206.GU 5 ONC. 'BALK j .,)_,J,: ,,,. ,..,.. ., ��, Y -eSs.a71.,s Kf7 rnisrn- . orr.cw uNGc45wrr • j tl • ' • , S J')cIarING. GRY._se.1v rWtr L— ( f• F ---• , ,,„•:;t: •, ..„.....„.:„. ) • . . . .. . ........... ....... ..... . .......... ......................._.............._............___...... ........_____ . , ., %11' " "t l.' ' TI41 �^ti 7< Planning & Zoning Department MEMORANDUM €4, qr TO: Historic Preservation Board Members / ///FROM: Dian and Board Secretary DATE: February 21, 2001 RE: Time Certain for Ending Meetings There was discussion at your January 17th meeting about having a time certain for ending your meetings. If you recall this came about due to you're concerns with the late hour making it difficult to give your full attention to agenda items. This same issue came up last year for the Planning & Zoning Board and as a result they have 10:00 PM as a time certain for ending their meetings. You would of course finish the item you were acting on when the time certain came about, then continue the remaining agenda items to a special meeting to be determined at that time. In the event the Board felt they could finish the remaining agenda items after 10:00 PM (i.e. 1 or 2 small items) you would have the option to do so. Recommended Action Move to make 10:00 PM as a time certain for ending Historic Preservation Board meetings, with any remaining agenda items continued to a special meeting. v = to, qr �-�' AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: March 21, 2001 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • February 21 , 2001 III. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS A. Variance-73 & COA-436: Richard Jones Residence, 306 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Richard Jones, Architect/Owner. Consider Granting a Variance from Land Development Regulations Section 4.3.4(K) Pertaining to the Rear Building Setback Requirement Associated with COA-436. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA-437: 511 NE 3rd Avenue, Single Family Residence, Del Park Historic District. Nancy Vincelli, Owner. Consider an Application for the Tax Abatement Program and the Proposed Renovations which Consist of a New Addition to the Rear of the Building. B. COA-438: Elizabeth's on 7th Avenue, Restaurant at 9 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District. Delray Beach Associates, Inc., Owner. Consider a Class III Site Plan Modification for a Proposed Restaurant, which Includes Enclosing the Existing Porch and Construction of a 225 Square Foot Cooler/Storage Room and an Off-Site Parking Agreement. 3/21 /01 Historic Preservation Board Agenda March 21, 2001 Meeting Page 2 C. COA-435: 10 Lake Court, Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Vincent Perry, Owner. Consider a Change in Windows from Aluminum Awning Windows to White Aluminum Single Hung Windows. D. COA-434: 203 NE 1st Avenue, Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Robert and Mary Ziegenfuss, Owners. Consider a Change in Siding from Wood Siding to Aluminum Siding. E. Pre-Application: Sundy Lane Master Plan, Block 61, Town of Delray, Old School Square Historic District. Michelle Balfoort, Architect. Provide Comments and Direction for the Sundy Lane Proposed Master Plan, No Formal Action is Required. F. Pre-Application: Price House, 1109 Sea Spray Avenue, Individually Listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. Gary Eliopoulos, Architect. Provide Comments and Direction for the Proposed Elevations, No Formal Action is Required. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff VI. ADJOURN J � M ,c)iut6 ich le Hoyland Planner POSTED ON: March 16, 2001 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: MARCH 21, 2001 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Vice-Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice-Chairperson Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott (left 8:20), Shane Ames (arrived 6:05), Donnamarie Sloan, Rhonda Sexton (left 7:35) MEMBERS ABSENT: Tony Keller, Dave Bodker STAFF PRESENT: Michelle Hoyland, Ellen Uguccioni, Diana Mund, Assistant City Attorney Jay Jambeck II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of February 21, 2001 were before the Board for consideration. Ms. McDermott moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 4-0. At this point on the agenda Mr. Ames arrived at the meeting. III. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: A. Variance 73 & COA 436: Richard Jones Residence, 306 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Richard Jones, Architect/Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a Variance from Land Development Regulations Section 4.3.4(K), pertaining to the rear building setback requirement associated with COA 436. Vice-Chairperson Jamison stated that this was a Quasi-Judicial item Therefore, anyone wishing to speak on this item would have to be sworn in. Board Secretary Diana Mund asked that anyone wishing to speak raise their right hand and then administered the oath. Vice-Chairperson Jamison inquired if the Board had any ex parte communication to declare. As there was none the Vice-Chairperson declared the Public Hearing open. Ms. Hoyland read a letter of support from David Bertrand, 310 N. Swinton Avenue. As there was no one else wishing to speak Vice-Chairperson Jamison closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve Variance 73 based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1), to reduce the rear building setback from 10' to 5' to allow a garage/guest room to be constructed. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 436 for the Waiver to Section 6.1.4(C)(3)(b) to allow a reduction in the 5' required setback for the pool deck to 2' along the north and west property lines, based upon positive findings with respect to Section 2.4.7(B)(5). It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 5-0 to approve COA 436 for the Design Elements for the garage/guest house and black canvas awning with white piping on the scallops at the entrance to the guest house as presented, based upon positive findings with respect to Section 4.5.1(E). IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 437: 511 NE 3`d Avenue, Single Family Residence, Del Ida Park Historic District. Nancy Vincelli, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering an application for the Tax Abatement Program, the design approval for the proposed rehabilitation and a new addition to the rear of the building. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 437 for the Rehabilitation and Addition, as presented based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E). It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 437 for the Preconstruction Application for the Historic Preservation Tax Abatement Program as presented, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5). B. COA 438: Elizabeth's on 7th Avenue, Restaurant at 9 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District. Delray Beach Associates, Inc., Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a Class III Site Plan Modification for a proposed restaurant, which includes enclosing the existing porch and construction of a 225 square foot cooler/storage room and an off-site parking agreement. 2- HPB Minutes 3/21/01 It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 438 for the Off-site Parking Agreement with Northern Trust Bank, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the restaurant is restricted from operating between the hours of 8:30 am and 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday; 2. That a pedestrian connection be made between Northern Trust Bank and the restaurant; 3. That signage be installed at the restaurant parking entrance stating that additional parking is available at Northern Trust Bank; and, 4. That the required off-site parking agreement is revisited if the restaurants parking lot is reconfigured. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 438 for the Class II Site Plan Modification, based upon positive findings with respect to the LDRs, subject to the following conditions: 1. That all Technical Items are addressed and three (3) copies of the revised plans are submitted; 2. That all improvements including the staircase and porch are relocated out of the NE 7th Avenue ultimate right-of-way; 3. That the off-site parking agreement be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit; 4. That a right-of-way deed be executed prior to issuance of a building permit; and, 5. That a note is added to the site plan that indicates that the patio area on the south side of the building will not be utilized as a dining or seating area. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 5-0 to approve COA 438 for the Landscape Plan, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following conditions: 1. That all Landscape Technical Items are addressed and three (3) copies of the revised site plans are submitted; and, 2. That the landscape plan be revised to relocate the proposed landscaping out of the right-of-way or that the applicant execute a landscape maintenance agreement with the City. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 438 for the Design Elements, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the railing shall be wood; 2. That the light pole and fixture shall be decorative and shielded; 3. That an agreement is executed for the installation of the awning within the right-of-way prior to issuance of a building permit; -3- HPB Minutes 3/21/01 4. That the existing columns of the porch are preserved and that three (3) sets of matching windows to those existing are installed between the columns; and, 5. That the handicapped ramp be sloped sufficiently to create a pedestrian walkway without a railing and still meet ADA requirements. At this point on the agenda Ms. Sexton left the meeting. C. COA 435: 10 Lake Court, Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Vincent Perry, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a change in windows from aluminum awning windows to white aluminum single hung windows. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 4-0 to approve COA 435 for Replacement Windows based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), as follows: 1. That the windows be white aluminum single hung windows with mullions that have an adequate profile; and, 2. That the mullions be staff approved. D. COA 434: 203 NE 1st Avenue, Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Robert & Mary Ziegenfuss, Owners. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a change in siding from wood siding to aluminum siding. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 4-0 to approve COA 434 based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), the Design Elements and the Bankers Row Master Development Plan, with the condition that any siding to be replaced be replaced with wood to match original siding. E. Pre-Application: Sundy Lane Master Plan, Block 61, Town of Delray, Old School Square Historic District. Michelle Balfoort, Architect/Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of providing comments and direction for the Sundy Lane proposed Master Plan. No formal action is required. The applicant gave an overview of their site plan and explained several different options for their master plan. At this point on the agenda Ms. McDermott left the meeting. -4- HPB Minutes 3/21/01 F. Pre-Application: Price House, 1109 Sea Spray Avenue, Individually Listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. Gary Eliopoulos, Architect/Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of providing comments and direction for the proposed elevations. No formal action is required. The Board was of the consensus that the proposed elevations were appropriate with the exception of the roof of the courtyard enclosure. They asked the architect to study this further. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None B. Board Members None C. Staff None VI. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 9:05 P.M. The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for March 21 , 2001 , which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on April 18, 2001. /// Diana Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. - 5- HPB Minutes 3/21/01 R 4' HISTO-RIC' PR`ESE AT1:0 BOARD Project Name: Variance-73, associated with COA-436; Richard Jones. Project Location: 306 N. Swinton Ave, west side of N. Swinton Avenue approximately 50' North of NW 3`d Street. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of granting a variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), pertaining to the rear setback requirements for property located in the OSSHAD (Old School Historic Arts District) zoning district; and approval of the design elements associated with COA-436. Also included with the proposal is a waiver request to LDR 6.1.4.(C)(3)(b) to reduce the side interior setback requirement for a pool deck from 5' to 2'. BACKGROUND The legal description of the property is Lot 16, Block 57, a Subdivision of the south 1/2 of Blocks 49 and 57 excepting the north 250 feet of the east '/2 of the south %/2 of Block 57. The existing two-story single family residence was constructed in 1998 and is Classical Revival in style. This structure is one of two constructed within this Block in 1998, with the other residence located directly to the south of the subject property in the Key West architectural style. • PROJECTDESCR"IPTION. The proposed improvements include: D Construction of a one-car garage and guest room in the southwest corner of the property. • The exterior of the new structure will have horizontal, white, vinyl siding to match the existing residence. al The proposed roof will be a gray shingle roof. • All windows will be white aluminum with black painted wood shutters. • An awning is proposed over the entrance to the guest room. installation of a 28' x 12' swimming pool with associated deck. I. HPB Staff Report Variance 73 &COA-436 Page 2 P R O'J E C:T D'E S:C`R 1 P T1 O N . Variance to the rear building setback requirement: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the rear setback requirement in the OSSHAD zoning district is 10' and the applicant is requesting a reduction of 5'. If granted, the variance will allow the construction of a new detached structure containing a one-car garage and guest room and a 28' x 12' swimming pool. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(J) Historic Preservation Board to Act on Variance Requests: The Board is guided by the following criteria. (1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) The variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenance, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed in the Local Register of Historic Places. (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic character of the historic district, or historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site. (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of a historic site or of a historic district. Granting the variance will not impact public interest, safety or welfare. There is a 16' wide unimproved alley to the rear of the property and there will be little or no impact on the neighboring lots to the west or the single family residence to the south. The applicant has stated and staff has confirmed that the properties immediately to the north and south of the subject property have structures that are set back 5' from the rear property line. Historically, many of the older garages in the Old School Square Historic District were constructed 5' or less from the alleyways. The reduction in the rear yard setback will provide the minimum necessary to create a more usable space for amenities. HPB Staff Report Variance 73 & COA-436 Page 3 The construction of the garage/guest room and pool is appropriate to the single family residence. The variance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of the neighborhood and will not adversely affect the neighboring properties. Waiver: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.4(C)(3)(b), paving must be 5' from the property line. As a pool deck is impervious, it is interpreted to be paving. The pool is irregular in shape and is approximately 12' wide and 28' long. The northern end of the pool is setback 7'/z' from the north property line, which complies with the required interior side setback in the OSSHAD zoning district. The pool is proposed to be set back 5' from the west property line and as stated previously a variance is being sought for this reduction. A pool deck may be constructed 5' from the property line and the proposed deck is to will extend 3' into the required 5' setback. Therefore, a waiver has been requested to reduce the setback for the pool deck from the required 5' to 2'. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. The purpose of the 5' setback for impervious material is to allow proper drainage so that rainwater is contained on site. With the above criteria in mind, the applicant has varied the deck setback along the north and west property lines in order to allow for adequate drainage. The Board has granted similar waivers with respect to pool decks and driveways, whose impact is greater, as driveways are usually longer that 15 or 20 feet. Design Elements: Garage/Guest House The one-story garage/guest room will be constructed in the same style as the existing single family residence along with the same materials. The horizontal siding will be white vinyl, the roof will have gray shingles and all windows will be white aluminum with black painted wood shutters. An awning is proposed over the double French door entrance to the guest room. Material and color for the awning will be specified at the meeting. HPB Staff Report Variance 73 & COA-436 Page 4 Pool The pool is a 28' x 12' kidney shaped pool and the deck will be stained concrete with a Chicago brick border. Fence A 5' high wood shadow box fence is proposed to enclose the pool area. Two shadow box gates are proposed one on the north side of the residence and one on the south. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve Variance-73 and COA-436 based upon positive findings with respect to 4.5.1(E) and (J), subject to conditions. 3. Deny Variance-73 and COA-436, base upon a failure to make findings with respect to 4.5.1(E) and (J). RECOMMENDATION: By Separate motion: Variance Based on positive findings with LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1), grant the variance to reduce the rear building setback from 10' to 5' to allow a garage/guest room to be constructed. Waiver Based on positive findings with LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), approve the waiver to LDR Section 6.1.4(C)(3)(b) to allow a reduction in the 5' required setback for the pool deck to 2' along the north and west property lines. Design Elements Based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), approve the design elements for the garage/guest room, pool and fence as presented with the awning material and color to be determined at the meeting. Attachments: Survey Site Plan/Floor Plan Elevations DISCRIFI1ON: Lotc 16 Block 57, A SUBDIVISION OF THE: S I:2 ( )1 RI.()C.K 49 & S7 I:XcE=.RFIN( THE N 250 FEET OF THEE 1/2 OF If ll ' i , ()1: IBI.00K 57, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 12 At 1'.i' R6 of the public rccordc of Palm Beach County, Florida (,rn et not valid unless embossed by the raised seal of the certifying surveyor. t•iirsry depicted hereon not covrrrd by professional liability insurance_ Parcel contains CoSTI`gitare Feet f lcvafionc Chown hereon .arc in a:cord with National Geodetic Vertical Datum 1919 - Farrel Ices rn FARM lout "(" According to Community Panel No. 125102 0004 C D.ucrl `1 li , ' Improvements other than shown were not located. Title Abstr.ct not performed nor furnished. Melaluca trees not loc.tred Benclim ark PB Cctuntt BM D-33 f:l.-valion 20.77 1 ,.-c n.o..-, R i 3 3 ' -'i.Lf 5� . ,., . / ^ • w 2_Iv / 3/. C.0 P E M /Pr 1 I Lr,.?Z! riffs - i ma's - 4- . 2 4 `-/ r , r. 7 ' ,S�..„, , , , a •.0 : O 00 Ca+K� Z, Z 5A0 fitint k 'COI." - • V SoG SwIn�vQ A✓[ ( Q h .r. .......1,41:...9e•••- j-- (') t 4 iii• .„ 7 t , ..,1c vc"c ti ht 4• il.} I/ slim t Q tt•tt h S' `b...e.:.rr.:. e t 24. \ 4 rh f 46 .rig I r . I y k it ~ It a o 2 Q' O� , I kQ� J - J /F� v r: 1 } uRkl/EY `ERT I F? EO O 'Edgar A C3c ne5 , RAJ Ot,n u i-r 5 :47 ' Ftr-sf Acne((cao i -rr)e if ur-o,oce CO pang ; r a c . + '-c • ' :-..R( hard .. J or e 5 t;.faciQ74c Z-23-0a Fina/3vt-1✓c 4 - 2t-/9 I (t tat .; I lil` t}l.il the' plat •I1„.0 it Ilk. Ylill !s aIJ1ftlt 6,f, 407` �-r.7-Se T,c-1,, e7e/(.r 4-/-'18 .tnti t,iti: , t is IQ, ., Ilt.tttt,n tii .t .Urs CI. 111.ICIC Milk! 111% 1 WALTER A. COANNELL INC nc�(tun, tha a i Btt, �ttrt'c's 1. a ur�i .ttC t+> ihr lacst t,l tttt !1 c� Enginstre tend Land Suner.:'tt i.nuv.It.lc.t Hui In. Ito•! . .tnd tll.it s.tid .t i\t 1, I. Ill ?? SF 4 -s' c ZG Et. 111+t! 5430 .1ttt,rl.till.C •', rtil tilt NIittitlltlitl il'tltlll-..11 'it.i11:l.liCi'. >C•t f 10t(11 1'1 Iht I Iiii Ida liti.trel til 1 Ansi �tusc•searC 1 ( I:.tlut'r � SuRYEY FOR 1GI7-6 -1 th, t i..it�l.l :'�t.1ttrrtlr.tr.act.c ( ., • �l�R IC RL JONE- 5 t"F UX • • V .111:'t 1. t .,t lir,'l1 1'I S 1 ^s �'. E w� ! �`A`E 1 '`' " Li, rccc 1 DATE 1:- O - S7 ,7 d `l yen.;•- nc,„•.1: l,e:e •.l r.elc hot eustra, tea for tititt ¢, i(.7 Pr . ` `. ,, ,. . � ' k i — ' — — ' — — — — — — ' — — ' — - — -- �—! ' � i /i /' o^ i � | L , /� ,' uxvu i' — ' r"'|`�`k ' fill /i|/ ^"m/ ^'^'»`; mx | � x:/' — '------- ` | o"uye ` mr / , ` / TO t1A101 EJd511fid ...."00:1___ ,„ — natio . r1 VT'm sAtid __ —TO t1/1TQ1 C J4STNid -- li l ----- Mil Wom SR/MS Courtyard elevation \,,' TOnnTO1 e>asnnd rear elevation front elevation elevations 3/16"=1'-0" --------------------- side elevation f HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD STAFF REP01RT j,.. Project Name: COA-437 Nancy Vincelli, Owner. Project Location: 511 NE 3rd Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD. The action requested of the Board is that of approval for the, rehabilitation of and addition to, a contributing single family residence, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J), and, Approval of the pre-construction application for the Historic Property Tax Abatement Program associated with the rehabilitation and addition, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(M). BACKGROUND '1 DESCRIPTION The subject property is located at 511 N.E. 3rd Avenue and contains a contributing single-family residence constructed in the Minimal Traditional style in 1946. The house is of masonry block construction with a stucco exterior and a flat roof. Most of the original single hung wood windows remain. Originally the house contained approximately 446 sq.ft., which consists of a living room, kitchen and bathroom. In 1948, a 104 sq. ft. sun porch was constructed on the east • side (rear) of the house. The sun porch addition is of frame construction with wood siding. The original, wood slat windows still exist. The applicant is proposing to demolish the 1948 sun porch, as it is in very bad condition, and construct a new 630 sq. ft. addition on the east and north sides of the house. The new addition will comprise of a master bedroom and bathroom, a bedroom and a laundry room. When the addition is completed the new living area will provide a total of 1,076 sq.ft. Also included is a new 132 sq. ft. covered, screened patio on the north side of the house. As the structure is more than fifty years old, the property is eligible for the Historic Property Tax Abatement Program. The applicant has submitted the associated pre- construction application, which will be reviewed concurrent with this COA. ANALYSIS The proposed rehabilitation to the existing structure is as follows: Demolition of the 104 sq. ft. sun porch on the east side (rear) of the house. HPB Staff Report COA-437 Page 2 ❑ Removal of window mounted air conditioning units and the installation of a new central heating and air conditioning system. The original single hung windows will remain. Proposed addition to the rear and side of the structure: • The 630 sq. ft. addition will have a combination hip and gable, fiberglass shingle roof, gray in color. The exterior of the addition will have a painted yellow, stucco finish to match that of the existing structure. ❑ Single hung aluminum windows, white in color, are proposed. • French doors will open out to the covered porch from the master bedroom. iJ The covered patio will be enclosed with a 24" high stucco finished, concrete block knee wall, screens and a screen door. The increase in square feet of living area and the covered patio addition will greatly improve the residences size while also making it more consistent with current market standards. The property to the north of this residence is vacant and a single family residence exists to the south. Additionally, this residence is one of few structures along the east side of NW 3`d Avenue. The proposed addition will be visible from NE 3rd Avenue and will provide for an upgrade to an otherwise nondescript residence and the existing streetscape. The addition of the covered porch and the use of a combination hip and gable roof will delineate the addition from the original structure. The proposed renovations are consistent with the Section 4.5.1(E) Development Standards and therefore it is appropriate to approve the Pre-construction Application associated with the COA. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Deny, with reasons stated 2. Continue with direction 3. Approve as presented. RECOMMENDATION By separate motion: 1. Based on positive findings with LDR Section 4.5.1(E), approve the rehabilitation and addition associated with COA-437 as presented. HPB Staff Report COA-437 Page 3 2. Based on positive finding with LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5), approve the Pre Construction Application for the Historic Preservation Tax Abatement program. Attachment: • Survey • Site Plan • Elevations - _• Floor Plan 1f--IiziTO5NrT LArND SURVEYORS 118 N.E. 16TH COURT4. Lipp-- , DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (407) 276-7575 FAn (407) 276-6621 ' t`q ., ✓'J `�' LJ.j/� �N=cat • • a [w 173 '1 \FA1p S i o 3 i q• z.s' it rrI .ON .n- .V i WlI/ Lr.. f • z.s' (. \ i p' i I: -FcAML--- - -i I r 4 _J7 i t ,ice • 1� I ��i I '� E .. ..' . Iry L- I _ I W I ^ v ' �i� i ✓I !b 'T i (N I�.U • • i `1 ' ,i, / F SCALE- VV S _EGENC SHEET ? CF? SHEETS BENCHMARK REFERENCE: O MANHC_=(y a•. FIRE HYDRANT (F.H.) 1 U CATCH BASIN IC.° -- _ WATER METER(W.M.) / ANCHOR E GUY ;� CABLE T.V.(C.A.T.V.) I`✓ / IRON ROC E CAP (i.R.BC.) E TELEPHONE(T LE.) _ P.P.; /~-WOOD DOWER POLE (WD. 1 '. CONCRETE DOWER POLE(CONC. P P.) II r PERMANENT CONTROL POINT(PC.P) !ID PERMANENT RE-ERENCE MONUMENT(RR.M,) ELEVATIONS BASED ON N.G.V.D. AND SHOWN THUS .1.:(2-111 REVISIONS DATE BY CK,D FLOOD ELEVATION INFORMATION II COMMUNITY No. /Zcf✓7 DATE OF FIRM ,1'� BASE FLOOD ELEV_ FIRM ZONE X t LOWEST FLOOR ELEV — PANEL No.000Z JOB NO. ..i j DATE: I AVG. SITE GRADE — SUFFIX D FILE N0. i•GiT i /�/;c/o 7 (DRAWN BY: JL CHECKED BY: JL F.B./PG. P/L!' i __ ,5.r. I!'n'lf .-- '! I , • :• ---- / ---------:‘— ) 1 i,-• 1 J 7 : 1 V' ill 5 v! :I i i 1 ; 13 III t., ....; C 1 ‘,\\ Z • ::. . " • r.,1,.., C•',1,,, ,c ,,,, „ 1\ \ =1.,4,c c,., (---:!2--..).C,L....,-•-- r'n rr, I /I I— /,541-1,7c.c.,,.....•,— I ---- i----T---- tJ1 il4t .q : 0 0 III F. 4 a T 3 -/ ri (____ ra.,,-..rti r L•,fc ui I A , Kt! ' ..) -,i :1 — 0• ;-, I . -------------__1,_ , !!--___ 'r. t- . - -c!-- :1 It.'4' V.," . I ,,,r l'.•‘, r, V_teeil-r.". ••.„113 •I__ ...//,1tor.! NTE:_ tz-t •2.no , !..i.. p s•,1 ore0 : •• A \ . •! I i • ! , •• ,I i ...------ ----------,, r- — 5 ! 5 .1 11> '- '----.......,....., ,a 0 -I ./ .......„..-----• (--- ii,...Sreea,,...../......,-.........„..e. .p...,..‹... '-....,.., j-- ,., p,-.... r-,......-r tz.....r III It . , • 1..-.0*.•'47_ .-.I1 n Tii 3.iZt V" I 11,4 • t.,“ ., ".,...1 / ..- u 0Li • f_ _ • ,•_, /2 2.4 . 1 LH .`..'.-!..`I __._ __ I --, ...7..2.-1' : • . — ,--- . , / r-, ,--..• L4,ti • LEFT ...:,.c.,-e- tf.-L.Evi..1-koN1 ' Ii ii ir k-j ' A.......='It II.L..11111 ..—/ VT',,..o'. . I"i•\ . ...- '...,v ..t..,--...._.:_. 13 -7•ev.tr.,,..........._, ...--------------------- ....--------------i -------1:: -......... 't: 7 1.4•-.' 44..- ' I,' .. -4' l' .. :'? ;I• . 1.....-1 .„.._:.:4,1*," - o ---- 11 ---- i'-‘a•• ri • ....,, . • -4/\ At ii, -I' . 171 7 . • 1 0 • -7,, •..,,,. ! T,.; ,..•,-;;;;.;,, .:.) , [:7 .... - o N.-1,1.C cf4 ttt , TO, k.„__:11 47.t „....----,:- ....=-,-.-.----..r-2. I - / -- \__I. r--1_ I - M . . _ .41.,,.,,,, .1 . o.4,v0 Pp..7 Nil_ — .... . e.i:;,.- Ilf I, ..., ii tg•3:C-- - , J00 . . 050 Ft+71.,e.k....• --'......--',.. . •.... .....' / [ g3a ri, ..--- --- ------„,.. 19 [ •-r r .•,,p,-,, f'-^r F'..f--, --1,...."-* . ' '''' „ /F±_ .1, _ILf2i c.• • \ - .1—----......-1 II 1 '..•,S,i.I F.t....,, ,. ..r to-j I — ! c4_ I -----i--_---L..--i- ___ 1 ___ ,—,_ - ,-_ ;J - 1--. -, i _\1 1 1 :1A:(41 1 —LI I I • Drct.....h..1 D. — - • ,!...,a I 1 I .:....t...,... le I1 ..., ci...-vE...°'. i-Gt.•o I • r 2 i:n--. .2. ',.1',.I'.../' /7..,[4.71-LP • 17-1.-../Ai•I -. PLAA-...1 _______..__ ___--- ----- Ile,: • e)" f HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD -bITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: March 21, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: IV.B. ITEM: Consideration of COA-438 which incorporates a Class III Site Plan Modification for a Proposed Restaurant, which Includes Enclosing the Existing Porch and Construction of a 225 Square Foot Cooler/Storage Room and an Off-Site Parking Agreement, Located on the Southeast Corner of East Atlantic Avenue and S.E. 7th Avenue. >- DELRAY .— `—.� VETERANS 1r SUMMIT - PARK — _ ATLANTIC C CONDO z w w —— r=— x PLAZA Li / —t17 3 BARR o I v/ -L_W�`�W- c ` • I I Z __ TERRACE iW t CONDO W < z 2 j q ATLANTIC AVENUE _ I I 11 ` I WATERWAY EAST < ® 111.i./ -:; __ qii COMMERCIAL I H 'il/ti 1 � Z �—*—'8U0 I QI IM=11 -11171- , , - GENERAL DATA: Owner Delray Beach Associates, Inc. Applicant Elizabeth's on 7th Agent Arthur J. Brauer Location Southeast corner of East Atlantic Avenue and S.E. 7th Avenue Property Size 0.40 Acre Future Land Use Map Commercial Core & Medium Density (5-12 units/acre) Current Zoning CBD (Central Business District) and RM (Multiple Family Residential- Medium Density) Adjacent Zoning North: CBD East: CBD & CF (Community Facilities) South: RM (Medium Density Residential) West: CBD & RM Existing Land Use Vacant Hair Salon (Hair, Hair, Hair Beauty Salon) Proposed Land Use Class III Site Plan Modification for a Proposed Restaurant, which Includes Enclosing the Existing Porch and Construction of a 225 Square Foot Cooler/Storage Room and an Off-Site Parking Agreement Water Service Existing on site. I Sewer Service Existing on site. W.B. I ITEM:>BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of COA-438, which incorporates the following aspects of a Class III site plan modification for Elizabeth's on 7th Restaurant, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c): • Site Plan • Landscape Plan, and, I Architectural Elevations. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of East Atlantic Avenue and SE 7th Avenue (9 SE 7th Avenue). BACKGROUND The The majority of the property is located in the CBD (Central Business District) zone district, while the south portion of the south portion of the property (parking area) is zoned RM (Multiple Family Residential — Medium Density). The property is located entirely within the Marina Historic District. The property consists of Lots 1-3 and 9-11 of Block 125 (Replat of the original Town of Linton subdivision), and contains approximately 0.40 acres. Lot 11 is located in the RM zone district. The structure in question is located on the east side of SE 7' Avenue, approximately 90' south of E. Atlantic Avenue. The building was constructed in 1924 as a single- family residence and was originally located adjacent to East Atlantic Avenue. In circa 1940, the building was relocated to its present location in order to allow the construction of the existing two-story mixed-use building along Atlantic Avenue, which was built in 1941. The first floor of the building has been utilized as a beauty salon and the second floor contains an apartment. A site plan modification request has been submitted to convert the first floor to a restaurant and is now before the Board for action. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal incorporates the following: • Conversion of the 1,999-square foot beauty salon to a restaurant. • Enclosure of the 187-square foot covered porch on the north side of the building for use as a kitchen and maitre d' station; Q Construction of a 225-square foot storage room/walk-in cooler addition on the east side of the building; Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Elizabeth's on 7`h-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations Page 2 • New wood stair railings on the north, south and east sides of the building; • Modifications to the parking areas are proposed that will result in 17 on-site parking spaces and four off-site spaces; Q Construction of a dumpster enclosure; and, Q Installation of associated landscaping. SITE PLAN MODIFICATION ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: Development Standards: The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Sections 4.4.13(G)(2) and 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the CBD zone district: DEVELOPMENT MATRIX: Standards Provided Building Height Max.- 48' i 8.5' Building Setbacks — Rear j 0' ; 5' Open Space 0% 15% LDR Chapter 4.4.13 Central Business District (CBD) Regulations: Parking: The site plan modification request was submitted prior to the text amendment that increased the parking requirement for restaurants to six spaces per 1,000-square feet, and eliminated the one-time one space reduction, under certain circumstances. Therefore, the previous code requirements apply as noted below. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(G)(1)(a), the parking requirement for the subject property is one parking space for each 300 square feet of new non-residential floor area. The proposed floor plans indicate that 412 square feet of new floor area will be added to the existing use area (187-sq.ft. for the porch and 225-sq. ft. for the storage building). Given the square footage of the new use area, the proposed expansion is required to provide two additional parking spaces. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(G)(1)(b), the parking requirements for the subject property can be reduced by Historic Preservation Board Staff Report • Elizabeth's on 7t''-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations Page 3 one parking space, as the allowable one-time reduction has not yet been applied to this site. Therefore, there is one new parking space required as a result of the additional floor area. Furthermore, the applicant proposes to reconfigure the existing parking area to accommodate the dumpster enclosure and a new handicap parking space. This reconfiguration results in a reduction from 20 existing parking spaces to 17 parking spaces. As the site is currently deficient with respect to parking, the eliminated spaces must be replaced. Based on the above, four parking spaces are required. The applicant has several options to address the deficiency, which include leaving the property in its present condition with no additional floor area, the in-lieu parking fee, reconfiguration of the parking area to provide additional on-site parking or an off-site parking agreement. The applicant proposes to provide the four deficient spaces off-site within the Northern Trust bank parking lot. The off-site parking agreement is discussed in the following section. Off-Site Parking Agreement: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(E)(4), in instances where uses do not have sufficient space to accommodate customer and employee parking demands, parking requirements may be provided off-site. Parking for day-to-day operation may be provided on other property within three hundred feet (300') provided that both properties are of the same general type of zone designation, and when in compliance with, and pursuant to, the following: 1. The 300' distance shall be measured along an acceptable pedestrian route; 2. Approval of such off-site parking may be granted by the body, which has approval authority of the related site and development plan; 3. An agreement providing an easement for such use is prepared pursuant to Subsection (E)(5) and is recorded prior to certification of the site and development plan; 4. The provision of the parking easement shall not diminish the ability of the property upon which it is placed, to accommodate its required parking. Analysis: As noted previously, the applicant has submitted a request to provide four spaces on the adjacent property (occupied by Northern Trust Bank) to the east pursuant to the off- site parking agreement. The Bank's parking area contains 32 spaces and is located approximately 525' from Elizabeth's on 7th restaurant when measure along an acceptable pedestrian route. The site plan indicates that a gate will be installed along the wall between the bank's parking area and the restaurant, which effectively reduces the pedestrian route to zero feet. While the gate has been indicated, a pedestrian connection must be made from the bank parking area to the restaurant. Also, signage should be provided at the restaurant parking entrance stating that additional parking is available at the Northern Trust parking lot. While the patrons of the Blue Anchor Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Elizabeth's on 7th-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations Page 4 restaurant are allowed to park in the bank's parking area, there is no formal agreement with the City associated with this arrangement, which would prevent Elizabeth's from utilizing the Bank's parking. The applicant has submitted a letter from Patio Partners, Inc., which is the owner of the Northern Trust Bank property, that states a willingness to enter an off-site parking agreement with the owner of the Elizabeth's on 7th property. The bank's hours of operation are Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The only other tenant of this building that holds an occupational license with the City is Winslow Press, which utilizes the site as a business office. While their operating hours are unknown, it is reasonable to assume that Winslow Press has standard business hours of operation and does not utilize the property after 5:00 p.m. The Blue Anchor's parking and the four spaces for Elizabeth's on 7th restaurant can be accommodated in the bank's parking area after business hours. Based on the above, the off-site parking agreement can be approved subject to a condition that the hours restaurant not operate between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Thus, the restaurant can only be open during evenings Monday through Friday, except for bank holidays. This agreement must be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. LDR Section 5.3.1 (D)(2) Right-of-Way Dedication: The City requires dedication of private property for public right-of-way when property is proposed for development. The property owner is responsible for providing one-half of this right-of-way. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), the ultimate right-of-way width for SE 7'h Avenue is 60'. The existing SE 7'h Avenue right-of-way adjacent to the subject property is 40' wide. Consequently, the applicant is required to dedicate 10' to the SE 7th Avenue ultimate right-of-way. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(4), a reduction of the required right-of-way may be granted by the City Engineer with a favorable recommendation of the Development Services Management Group (DSMG). The DSMG and City Engineer considered the reduction of the ultimate right-of-way for SE 7'h Avenue and approved a reduction from 60' to 50', requiring dedication of five-feet along the west side of the property. The site plan notes the dedication of the five-feet to the SE 7'h Avenue right-of-way. The proposed site plan indicates that new stairs/porch, awning and landscaping will be located within the five-feet that will be dedicated to the City. It is acknowledged that when roadway improvements are made to this section of SE 7'h Avenue, the two parking spaces on the west side of the parking area will be eliminated. A condition of approval is attached that the site plan be revised to locate the proposed improvements out of the ultimate right-of-way including the landscaping and staircase. Other Issues: Handicap Parking: The applicant proposes to convert two existing back-out parking spaces on the north side of the restaurant to one handicap parking space. The proposal includes a ramp on the north side of the building that leads to the front door. The proposed location of this handicap parking space creates an unsafe situation with respect to the backing of the larger vans into the right-of-way. Staff recommends that this handicap space be Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Elizabeth's on 7`h-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations • Page 5 relocated to the south side of the building where the compact parking spaces are proposed. The patio area can be reduced to accommodate the parking space. A handicap ramp could be installed to the door on the south side of the building or to the front door via the patio to the public sidewalk and then to the front door. This configuration would allow the retention of the two parking spaces on the north side of the building. A condition of approval is attached that the handicap parking space be relocated to the south side of the building. Patio: The property contains a terrace garden/patio on the south side of the restaurant. This area cannot be utilized as a dining/seating area unless additional parking is provided. The applicant has indicated an interest in using this area in the future for dining and will be required to process a site plan modification that addresses parking at that time. A condition of approval is that the patio not be utilized with a note provided on the site plan. Technical Items: While the revised site plan has accommodated most of the staff concerns the following items remain outstanding, and will need be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit. 1. That the site data table is revised to correctly note the parking requirement as 2.25 parking spaces per residential unit. 2. That a recorded Declaration of Unity of Title for lots 1-3 and 9-11 is submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. That the overall height of the light pole and fixture is reduced to 25' when measured from grade. 4. That the location of sewer and water service to the building shall be noted on the site plan. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS The perimeter buffers adjacent to parking areas will consist of Solitaire Palms and Live Oak trees. These areas will be underplanted with Red Tip Cocoplum. Foundation and interior landscaping will consist of Pygmy Date Palms. Solitaire Palms, Live Oak trees, and existing Black Olive trees. These areas will be underplanted with Red Tip Cocoplum, Liriope Evergreen Giant, Crinum Lilly, and St. Augustine sod. As previously stated, the landscaping along the west side of the property is proposed in the area that will be dedicated as right-of-way. The landscaping must either be relocated or an agreement obtained to allow the landscaping within the right-of-way. This has been attached as a condition of approval. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Elizabeth's on 7`h-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations Page 6 Landscape Technical Items: The following Landscape Plan items remain outstanding, and will need to be addressed prior to building permit submission. 1. That the tree species shall have a minimum overall height of 12' at the time of planting, a minimum of four feet of single straight trunk with six-feet of clear trunk, and a six-foot canopy spread. 2. That the landscape plan shall be revised to a 1:10 scale. 3. Proposed landscaping shall be relocated to eliminate conflict with overhead utility lines in accordance with direction by the City Horticulturist. 4. The new light pole along the south property line shall be noted on the landscape plan. DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS Architectural Elevations As noted in the background section of this report, the building was constructed in 1924 as a single-family residence and was originally located adjacent to East Atlantic Avenue. in circa 1940, the building was relocated to its present location in order to allow the construction of the existing two-story mixed-use building along Atlantic Avenue, which was built in 1941. The first floor of the building has been utilized as a beauty salon and the second floor contains an apartment. The building contains opposing gable roofs with rafter tails and asphalt shingles. The building has wood siding and is painted gray with white trim and fascia. The applicant proposes to enclose the porch, construct a storage area and install new wood stair railing. The Board discussed the proposed elevation changes at its meeting on February 21, 2001. The Board directed the applicant to revise the north elevation to incorporate windows on the north side of the enclosed porch to match the existing windows. The applicant has revised the elevations to relocate the existing windows to the new porch wall. The Board directed the applicant to retain the existing columns from the porch. The revised plan indicates that the three existing porch columns will be preserved. Finally, the applicant was directed to install a 1:20 slope handicap ramp in order to eliminate the need for railings. The applicant has not complied with this direction and needs to be discussed by the Board. While the applicant has fully not complied with the Board's direction, the elevations have been revised indicating that vertical spindle rather than horizontal will be provided for all railings. As the ramp is located on the north side of the building for a short distance, it will not be as imposing as it would if installed along the front of the building. However, a condition of approval is attached that the railing be wood in order to be consistent with the architecture of the house. The applicant also proposes to install a Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Elizabeth's on 7'-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations Page 7 new entry canopy with a burnt orange canvas cover. The building will be painted off- white with beige trim and fascia. The storage building is located on the east side of the restaurant and will not be visible from the public right-of-way. It contain s a flat roof with wood siding painted to match the new color scheme of the building. The applicant proposes to install a light pole on the south side of the parking area. The light pole is concrete with "shoe-box" fixtures. Give the location of the property adjacent to residential uses and the historic character of the building, it is appropriate to provide a decorative pole and fixture. A condition of approval is attached, that a decorative light pole and fixture is provided and that it be shielded to avoid spillage onto the residential property to the south. Staff recommendation: As noted in the site plan section of this report, the proposed staircase, porch and awning will be located in the ultimate public right-of-way. A condition of approval is attached that the entry features are revised so that they are located out of the public right-of-way. The entry foyer can be reduced in order to relocate the porch, awning and stairs out of the right-of-way. This will not significantly change the elevations and staff recommends approval of the changes at this time subject to a commensurate condition of approval. It is noted the awning may encroach into the right-of-way subject to an agreement with the City. . ... .__...... REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c)(Class III Site Plan Modification), a Class III site plan modification is a modification to a site plan which represents either a change in intensity of use, or which affects the spatial relationship among improvements on the land, requires partial review of Performance Standards found in LDR Sections 3.1.1 and 3.2.3, as well as required findings of LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5). Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5 (G)(5) (Findings), with a Class III site plan modification formal findings under Section 3.1.1 are not required. However, a finding that the proposed changes do not significantly affect the originally approved plan must be made concurrent with approval of a Class III modification. The development proposal involves a 412 sq.ft. expansion to the existing building and conversion to a restaurant. The additional floor area consists of enclosing an existing porch and new storage room/cooler. Adequate water and sewer capacity exists to accommodate the proposal. The improvements are related to the conversion of a hair salon to a restaurant. The total proposed floor area of the restaurant is 2,411 square feet. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), this minor modification does not significantly impact the previous findings as they relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrence or the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with the Land 'Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Elizabeth's on 7th-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations Page 8 Development Regulations was discussed earlier in this report. The development proposals minor impact on Concurrency items is discussed below. Traffic: The 2,411 sq.ft. restaurant use generates 198 new average daily trips. The hair salon generated 81 average daily trips. Therefore, the conversion of the restaurant and new floor area results in a net increase of 117 average daily trips onto the surrounding road network. The proposed restaurant conversion/expansion will not have a significant impact on the surrounding road network and is exempt from meeting concurrency standards, as the property is located in the TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area). Solid Waste: The proposed 2,411 sq. ft. restaurant will generate 30.02 tons of solid waste per year (2,411 sq.ft. x 24.9 lb./sq.ft./year = 60,033.9 Ibs/2,000 lb. = 30.02 tons). The hair salon generated approximately 5.40 tons of solid waste per year. Therefore, the conversion of the restaurant will have a net increase of 24.62 tons of solid waste per year. The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level REVIEW BY OTHERS Downtown Development Authority: At its meeting of February 21, 2001, the DDA (Downtown Development Authority) recommended approval of the site plan modification proposal. The DDA recommended approval subject to the provision of additional lighting in the parking areas. Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of February 8, 2001, the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) recommended approval of the site plan modification proposal. Courtesy Notices: Special courtesy notices were provided to the following homeowners and civic associations: n PROD • President's Council o Marina District • Beach Property's Association Letters of support and objection, if any, will be presented at the SPRAB meeting. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report . Elizabeth's on 7th-Class III Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations Page 9 ASSESSMENT The development proposal is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Chapter 3 and LDR Section 2.4.5(G). The enclosure of the porch and new 225- square foot attached storage/cooler is consistent with the existing development. The proposed modifications will have an insignificant impact on public services. The off-site parking agreement will accommodate the required parking spaces. The proposed stairs, landscaping and porch must be relocated out of the public right-of-way and an agreement provided for the awning. Finally, the relocation of the handicap parking space will provide a safer area for the handicap patron. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve COA-438 and the associated site plan and design elements for Elizabeth's on 7th Restaurant. 3. Deny COA-438 and the associated site plan and design elements for Elizabeth's on 7th Restaurant with basis stated. RECOMMENDED ACTION I By Separate Motions: Special Action: Approve the off-site parking agreement for Elizabeth's on 7th Restaurant on the Northern Trust Bank property subject to the condition that the restaurant is restricted from operating between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, that a pedestrian connection be made between Northern Trust Bank and the restaurant, and that signage be installed at the restaurant parking entrance stating that additional parking is available at Northern Trust Bank. Site Plan Modification: Approve COA-438 for the Class III site plan modification for Elizabeth's on 7th Restaurant based on positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, subject to the following conditions: 1. Address all Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans. 2. That all improvements including the staircase and porch are relocated out of the NE 7th Avenue ultimate right-of-way. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Elizabeth's on 7'-Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations Page 10 3. That the handicap parking space is relocated to the south side of the restaurant. 4. That the off-site parking agreement be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. That a right-of-way deed be executed prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. That a note is added to the site plan that indicates that the patio area on the south side of the building will not be utilized as a dining or seating area. Landscape Plan: Approve COA-438 for the Elizabeth's on 7th Restaurant landscape plan based on positive findings with respect to Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations, subject to the following condition: 1. Address all Landscape Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans. 2. That the landscape plan will be revised to relocate proposed landscaping out of the right-of-way. Design Elements: Approve COA-438 for the Class Ill site plan modification design elements for Elizabeth's on 7th Restaurant based upon positive findings with respect to Section 4.5.1, subject to the following condition: 1. That the railing shall be wood. 2. That the light pole and fixture shall be decorative and shielded. 3. That an agreement is executed for the installation of the awning within the right- of-way prior to issuance of a building permit. Attachments: • Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Architectural ElevationE Report prepared by: Scott Pape, Senior Planner • II: ..II'.;'I' I ; •• , I' ii ,` 1,,A( ; II I )I ,I �cI. \ „ \ .1.:1 I., ( i1 i1 II,,I I.)I in lll' • , L..,. II II i,{ • r i . ) Ir \r • 111 'j°,II r . , I `';I \ { I I'I ��{� r �. 4' •i .',A IAli 01 II 11VII 1 C1 I 1 \ I I IIII I !\I 1 I (`. • • Ilt ! t II:, 1 ; ( :/ • � (I�'` )I,I{_.I,'{�LIi I�.(./ I /` I I \\J I , � ) , ) Nr I( I I I `\, I t' IJ,. /. I i l '•I'll'I l I'I, I I\ L� I I�!( I r( � II • II �I. I . • / O ` j° _._ l•11:./ L:l (.>!�• -.. I•'ll1 I:,'I f Lt<.I'nl c �I II in').:1 C II' \ ..� • • L, •lt, un .. i • l I _..... _. ' r III;:. : V1 - J.... II1.I II./I 1`..I 111I { I 11.1 ). .. - - _ 41 / • _ ' 1 - I:_I 41 I I'.I,yul.. 7'.u`r IU II'r'• `1 n, I .B 1 I I I | Y.|` \ AU1)(1'i()N \. ' , , w^'x rc, [n��) � ------------- � . • , .'..fctli...''..'• .,,.'..,,51'f.4,!,•:;',.- I I .yi"hr,.."',.,.. •,' ,:lci.'‘,. • . 11 III ,olf,if..-i'i•.". '' ;.:1;,';',.••.;*-' ' 1.4.‘..-..,1 • 1 1. •,.., -.'..,;:C:';',.'' • 1111111111 1111111"1 n' • _ . . • „,.„, ,.,,•,„„ ,....Y.,.,';',,i:.••;-..., ,,.„ ,„.„ ,.•.‘,. ,,, ,.,,,,)•,,:•,./.,..• , I 1,' ..1',.:;', ... ,,b,,i,.;',.:.,'.1....• . .-_IIILE.,24.!!!'2".:11:/i .SI:1:•°,.j.i',i'' r 111111111111 ',". x„.1.-, •,•',. ; - .,,:.i,,,,..ii'•,.•! IIIIIIIII . . -.. . . -.:— '''':1 0111111[1 __1,•1•,A:';‘''',; . ; • ,, 1I 1111111111 ..,i1,...,•',„ :' ,'''''•,1';''1 i ',....'•1;.‘ •ii;1.'1.1..'t1::::. ‘41ilf*'" •••;":1'1',,17'' . ,,.'';',';'.C•f0':..,:•; „ .':.:•••••;;;,',. .• lr•' „•;.,1:',i,:•,i, '•,, 1 •••,,,.1:' siLill ',j,z.''.;(•.` t,• ••;,,i„S1.1.•,,,:i,,,••:1,., ,4".•:,;:''';':.''';'• ' ' I.',!••?!,''.'; 'it';.triT..''.,.'!;°•.: • ',.:',.'1•4!?.;"..'.',.!,.... .•, 1 I :: II II ,,,,•11.4 P".•) I I I I pi 1 I I I I IIIII .•'My,1.,,,Ir rv.1{il((trt)., 111111/1111111111111 Oil/tor 4't 1..• • ,,,P . ' . --: • .., -- -,-- ..,„. ....,..,... ,-\ • 7- ::. • .- . .'•. ,).4,..',..:,','.'';.:, I I 1 H I II 1"1 I I . ,:''..,•!!.-..,; :-, tF,,',',';',';'4',.1."1.:1•„1!,. 1 IIIII II I 1111111111 -': ..._. .r,....q...,.i.':' • • '...1/•,•,•-•• .::i 1111111111111 ' ----•— ------------- ., ,.•- 111:.(.) 1 IT II ,I':\-"ATI() 11 ,',,J .,?,,:!•.','''• :','''•''.;• ' ', •',;'/,'';',••‘:i.?.., '•'..",''',',1••;rl , . ' / . ||| | 0 U 40 , ' 1/1J/|V A,I' xi ` ` ' ' ..� ' [N z� -_~-- UofIVI ' UU/Vm11111111 / I .It:V/V!'/()N p�W, lq omit , , 1 �. a HISSTORI'C PRESERVATI`ONBORD" STAFF.REPORT ' Project Name: COA-435, Vincent A. Perry, Owner. Project Location: 10 Lake Court, Del-Ida Park Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval of COA-435 to allow the replacement of all windows on the single family residence, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND. The subject property is located on south side of Lake Court approximately 100' east of Swinton Avenue and consists of Lots 9 & 10, Block 4, Del-Ida Park. The 2,000 sq. ft. single family, residence was constructed in 1952 and is a non-contributing structure. DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS The proposed changes include removal of all window security screens and replacement of all mill finish, aluminum, awning style windows to white aluminum awning windows with applied mullions. With the use of the applied mullions the windows will appear to be colonial in style. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented. RECOMMENDATION , Based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E), approve the replacement of the windows as presented. Attachment: Survey Meeting Date: March 21, 2001 Agenda Item: IV.C. ts." :L:; - T t .-..�� .ter_'.•_-�' r ..-..•-�•� , �r..e_.+_r.r^�..:.-�-._.r _':.n',M•.w ila .,,4-> : .);,/f , , . „.7., , ...... ....., , .,,,..„.„, ..........t./...4./r- _., ..„6.,-0,,,.,m7,...,,:„,. „. ...... ,,... :-.) . . „„.. ... _ _.---7- �r } \i'j • A ri'Rei•. 'r ..r �t1 w • _ i „/ _ • . � r.r.. • r. • • .71 t • fir.t• I •I tom ' • _F i'!—V l j+lW* GG 7 ,.: .....1. �L! i ' : � • .s /:,:// ✓/'c1�. \ \ / v_• , \ h'•-'•'✓ \ rm\+\ �� .•/�,br�:/G� (:C / \� .' � c •Oe I� j •,�✓err:F �Lri Nc s--:(/:r-it=/./ �..-1: r r:::._1 I / r I r :.-.:1 I (u'.Q .. :i ^!i•. //O,'/r Z /-5 .'4/✓-//C, ,..4'LOLi.'.�r Ow l.-/O.<` i�,Ce .X.-,, This drawinu not ' i//./G _G r i%,-!.4/ Ti,':G.&G,= r'; �,O.2Jc.�/4/�G',, valid without an ';%/Gs- GF ;ri.✓U..'/C c%G/%"&5 Gr i%f/,f,," embosseo sea:. ✓fi% :%//`,V,Gi' / 4/% ✓�✓// _ , r%(:: i s;;r.t. /r'.-,�O' I vl AT liObr:N. I Ps.:,.N . G ;i-��; SUI;�� s C'� i��, INC. i . ENC.:INF:ERZ:, — _:a:D SURV_YZ.'RS— _AND PLANNERS j . . I r,--DE" .4';7:iti r ..DELR:. „_A7.,..FLD-n:D:.35.,:< 776.<631 ..2•327_ I • I . ////G.1'; / iEeV:Ell:1F: tnsi tnt•eiz:snow,nett on iz c nut an:center rtpnsenlall0n of a sur•e,'01 JOi-7N•Y'WE(rr�fh s oestnoec Hereon meal in atwfesnst wnn Inc minimum ietnnicci sianoaras for Ian:sutra?. c sItlt o•Floss zs sr;lain 0•'C:nssie:21Hri•6 Ftori:c Aammisi:011ve Coat. F`. PLS-NC.S 2 t'Opr.✓`/.� v:.CE r:C __. ORDER SO._'•-'- -Gb HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD • STAFF REPORT Project Name: COA-434, Robert Ziegenfuss, Owner. Project Location: 203 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval of COA-434 to allow the replacement of siding on the single family residence, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property is located on east side of NE 1st Avenue approximately 100' north of Martin Luther King Jr. Drive (NE 2nd Street). The property consists of the south 5.5 feet of Lot 10 and all of Lot 11, Block 74, Town of Delray. The 1,200 sq. ft. contributing, single family, Mackie Cottage is located within Bankers Row and was constructed in 1937. DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS The proposed changes include replacing all existing wood siding with aluminum siding. There are three different types of siding existing on this structure and they include: • Aluminum siding on the south half of the residence; • Wood siding on the north half of the residence; and, • Tongue and grove wood siding on the enclosed porch on the east side (rear) of the residence. The owner would like to make all of the siding on the structure uniform, thus replacing all wood siding with aluminum siding. Historically, the use of wood siding is original to the Mackie Cottage structures. Recent modifications to other cottages on Banker's Row have provided wood siding. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS _ 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented. Meeting Date: March 21, 2001 Agenda Item: W.D. HPB Staff Report COA-434-203 NE 1st Avenue Page 2 RECOMMENDATION'" Approve the COA-434 for 203 NE 1st Avenue based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), the Design Guidelines and the Bankers Row Master Development Plan, with the condition that any siding to be replaced be replaced with wood. Attachments: • Survey • Site Plan ti • RI 'Er" {„ I :-v..r'f[.. l ~['.x r.ld /•..�,.r V^. I i'wm_. rr. Ca 1r O Ir...1 I 1 1 I • al, !,r rcr,.r n I I i..r. cuc n.. A_.1 O n' na rr• ,.. 4.b' or. ...,r r, r,.... -ra -/ —_.T ,r.,,,. t. n... N Y9.7r N.00" p1 • 5--• .s 1 a Ne.IA,.. t.t•o' '1.7,.F N.xa� / 9'Ue\ 7.=..'T. I r>>.... pr. pr. ..n.. kk• ''1 n r ._�,�.:.,•a •r WC.y1 Y. ^ _�. :*rlrl.0 re C .h n f _ - In. Y y + r.,,,,Care' (v; ,e.ao—'-_r __�[r�•�,�ae%- �1r...n•.._..,Aa.+ .. ... b� ' a x.. 1,,.. _ n,r ;R11 V j. I 24 ,.....,„i,.....,..,r...,. •.'.�.. r..... to to . • rr rt I i a r 11. 11 d er f N " r"` r •yr• I I 3a • W .. 1 1 W� 1E-' a ` sr FF , •- 1I itriZin'rr Y r1r71:ct9 14n 1 1-r6- -3 "I--- ^ �. • r-1 a xl nr l" ,✓ .0 w r rrE t t . ul U fY�11 rJ —1 1 r.a„lcra., r ILE Q — 1 51 1 11I :', �rJ II ,7 >,> ?1 / Cl �C;eIW V Ad...4 I nrE•. .7 1 — n St. x A N+ if.'. ,5 • co ,fo r711,0 nw..0 r"p�.1A,ro./ > Jid tti} ? �i.:c,Cf1 `�i "^ 4. P[r+,rr-n a,+ r[Ar ? ,.f,-, • '�' ll.vr c'-i.s cr•c.1cR rr-,r.r. er_r. 4 .<,�n,r-� rLvrsrol�srrtttu�• CO e �` V. rr. 75_ `' '-.,.r cc: ,qrr. G1f_[.n NCti.,,r.FJ, n r.,ur: liT' - _—_ _ I cn — fn IL •--... W `A o'er NUiM 111 - SUF.YEYURS CE71N1C�TIUN; - — - - 33 - _ _ OC P.x-.vrron.MO( r uw.1M1�10C Vor.RC.1WSMC CO 01M _ fr-�T--A'- ; CO PO.1 .n',m,.ip[ prvM 111 rrp,Ctufo:O.0 IM.K.eCVrp.r,V[4 ma.nn,.,..n K 010170 w > 00:11-CtIMMI. OTO[.T.TNUa4 .1.W74l!Y rtt rt...Craw74100.70 .,•O M..,.lrrlxvr!.,•, u rQp..Mw.a'nC..c.0 rrugti.Z RM..Nsrrm, /.GGRFI/.TIQ175_ ,w1 r+v['.•C 001v.:+ VrsMlouo.,1S.A .1'unn 1•c v. .... 7171011 0, rr C17071 : mnev.rc..r >7111.4.17•1 PPP WW 71 V>,n r.uvwr.Varetmrx Or com/ rot Cr lro,.M r i. COO omnK V tr... / n :i N)i V 1;Y 1 N C.—(} 1 1�.P L .?{o ry MC 1a11 Or07 nt, awy1•00/1C. 1.n 10110/ la. c-�-a,lirr..:.r en.-.e 1-i-nn..4-,ca a>+n n..•. cva.n , rurw-[.,.rtorowero[•r_rw>.cn..uu.m / I n,,,,; a an lwa.rz.,..., rim K dwxna-...r-r1 .o.a,rac►w,..nn.c„oa v.., 'y"/r�rn! jT y ll tlK1 ,../! f.�/..' be +«71.1.111 11 ra.[n�.u•.} 701.171111(017177wen>O 011un1.0.01nr,nnrsnn C o ( ."'••.• Y . 11 COO(.Ut r,lnnnv.r A 10 Ven.r.,p.w Af 7•fwLtru+o p.m+re ,,1n KT I101 MOO 1M'11.1:_!:rrItt•too.!:1I 7713.0111071 OP 0iu,CO ,. CO .,rM M>FAn[c.a..n.+•.Vr....r.,• 1'+rtn,p1 C. IM,,,a Pm aa..rnc.'.�,n� ro'rr t-,r00Nrr.r 1.0n10.,7•-a,,:•,N1471070a i.7 r.G-r, (;/'•I17-C cE5^nrrw —.._—.-__- n' `."'� r. 1.70114M41..'.�'..;:mr.w.a.r.•m.0 a. r.e.•.irr�- nc.n.,•n I t�lti-:�� • �_ LAIWT F C11S V rrVrv,COM .s � C) aoo<<M _ �J FY�15T1 N� TG►v(iva( RN s .DitNiel ›- --- Q q) 0 T A16W SuoFit our .4x4 — S ; ,� ti` 7----y--! �••I l ?Olv\iw`„1` . ^,_-- ,r - / I �r i iiv�f j I 9oc�m _�� / goo crr. , ALUiv\1KtUNA r / 1 Q`3 Eoc. 1=" > I- �a'f �3 0 1 `' $x(� IAxb ge,� I ° * 8.4 I I1 lc i 80ccr, 8 �- n 0 1 i -+1 rror ,o. l IJca RciVrJ D;cY .-Li^ y c 1 i N i I TO 10 _—"� is,.10 Amman r, a is, �3/y .PrG 117 s,N� . — 16....K. I / To BE REPL: Er il/1�0t1 i L I u I a Si Di ti 61 __- I aDPGFM I (.=( '.X tST1 NE) -,-LU ri\i K1i,INA i 45,1 to , =r �,�q' P AGENDA r HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: April 4, 2001 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER [!. APPROVAL OF MINUTES E March 21, 2001 III. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS - A. Variance-74 & COA-439: Oid School Square, 51 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District. Jose Aguila, Authorized Agent. Consider Granting a Variance from Land Development Regulations Section 4.3.4(K) Pertaining to the Side Street Setback Requirement Associated with COA-439. Consider a Class III Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Design for a Proposed Band Shell, ConcessioniRestroom/Sound & Light Building, and Loggia. Recommendation for a Waiver to the Height Limitation for the Band Shell. !V. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA-440: 330 SE 7th Avenue, Non-Contributing Residence, Marina Historic District. Lisa Hopkins and Jeff Shaffer. owner and applicant. Consider a Change in Exterior Paint Colors and Driveway Material. 4/4/01AIIIMMIIIMI .� " HPB Meeting April 4, 2001 Page 2 V. DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS ITEMS A. Pre-Application — Addendum to COA-430: The Mews at Sloan Hammock, 102 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District. Dan Sloan, Owner. Request for comments, no formal action required. VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff VII. ADJOURN Ellen Uguccioni Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: MARCH 29, 2001 FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT t4ST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME TOMMITTEE ON BOARD, COUNCIL,S COS S MISSI A UNOIT, AUTHORITY, OR Cloan, Donnamarie MAILING ADDRESS [X]CITY []COUNTY []OTHER LOCAL AGENCY []STATE 106 SE 7th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 CITY COUNTY Delray Beach Palm Beach DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY April 4, 2001 NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, City of Delray Beach OR COMMITTEE Historic Preservation Board WHO MUST FILE FORM 4 This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers,this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is prescribed for all other boards, i.e.those at the state level. =ART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed. PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.1343(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained. In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: (a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is abstaining from voting; and (b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below. NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting. In such cases, however,the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made. I,the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on April 4, 2001: _ (a) I abstained from voting on a matter which(check one): X inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retained. (b) The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Agenda Item V.A: COA 430-Pre-Application, 102 SE 7`h Avenue;The Mews at Sloan H mock. My hu band; and I are the owners. / I Date riled Signature Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART B VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom is retained is required to disclose the nature of is interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs. I,the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclosure that on , 19 (a) I voted on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retainef (b) The measure on which I voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Date Filed Signature Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. this form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 11.317(1983),A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE ORE MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL C.. SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENAL f NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2001 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Keller, Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott, Shane Ames (arrived 6:30), Dave Bodker, Donnamarie Sloan, Rhonda Sexton STAFF PRESENT: Ellen Uguccioni, Michelle Hoyland, Diana Mund, Assistant City Attorney Jay Jambeck II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Board Secretary Diana Mund stated that she was unable to complete the minutes for the March 21, 2001 meeting but would have them ready for the April 18, 2001 meeting. A. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: A. Variance 74 & COA 439: Old School Square, 51 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Jose Agulia, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) pertaining to the side street setback requirement associated with COA 439. A Class III Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Design Elements for a proposed band shell, concession/restroom/sound & light building and loggia. Recommendation for a waiver to the height limitation for the band shell. Chairman Keller stated that this was a Quasi-Judicial item. Therefore, anyone wishing to speak on this item would have to be sworn in. Board Secretary Diana Mund asked that anyone wishing to speak raise their right hand and then administered the oath. Chairman Keller declared the Public Hearing open, as there was no one wishing to speak the Public Hearing was closed. At this point on the agenda Mr. Ames arrived at the meeting. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to recommend to the City Commission approval of a waiver to increase the height of the band shell from 35' to 38'8", based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to grant the variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the required setback for the band shell from 15' to 14', based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1). It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to grant the variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the required setback for the concession/restroom/sound & light building from 15' to zero feet, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1). It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 7-0 to approve the Class III Site Plan Modification for the Old School Square Band Shell, based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings of the LDRs), and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submittal of three (3) copies of the revised plans addressing the conditions of approval; 2. That the applicant shall submit and work with the City to implement a lighting and pedestrian plan between the band shell and the City Hall parking areas; 3. That a letter shall be submitted from Florida Power & Light that approves of the location of the buildings; 4. That an additional sidewalk is provided from Swinton Avenue to the loggia; 5. That the southern parking space at the dead-end parking area on the west side of NE 1st Avenue is converted to a maneuvering area; 6. That the site plan be revised to note a stabilized sod (or other suitable surface) storage area for the Downtown Development Agency's Christmas tree container; and, 7. That the existing angled parking spaces on the east side of NE 1st Avenue remain in their existing configuration or are restriped in accordance with the City Engineer's directions. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 7-0 to approve the Landscape Plan for the Old School Square Band Shell, subject to the following conditions: 1. That revised plans be submitted addressing the Landscape Plan Technical Items listed in the staff report; -2- HPB Minutes 4/4/01 2. That on the south elevation of the band shell additional Sable Palms be added; 3. That additional Live Oaks be added on the east elevation of the concession stand to match the Live Oaks on the west side; 4. That additional shrub and ground cover under the plantings be added under the Sable Palms on the east and west sides of the concession building; and, 5. That additional Palms be added at the cutouts along the sidewalk to conceal the maintenance building. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to continue the Design Elements for COA 439 to the April 18, 2001 meeting. The applicant was advised to address the articulation of the band shell's north elevation, and to provide two (2) composite streetscapes which illustrates the relationship of the new buildings to the existing. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 440: 330 SE 7th Avenue, Non-Contributing Residence, Marina Historic District. Lisa Hopkins & Jeff Shaffer, Owner/Applicant. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a change in exterior paint colors and driveway material. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Ames and passed 7-0 to approve COA 330 based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), as follows: B. That the color for the major wall surfaces be a soft lime green; C. That the trim color be white; and, D. That the driveway be pearock. At this point on the agenda Ms. Sloan stepped down from the Board. V. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. Pre-Application —Addendum to COA 430: The Mews at Sloan Hammock, 102 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District. Dan Sloan, Owner/Applicant. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of providing comments and direction for the proposed site improvements. No formal action is required. At this point on the agenda Ms. Sloan returned tot he Board. -3- HPB Minutes 4/4/01 VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None B. Board Members None C. Staff Ms. Uguccioni informed the Board that John Johnson would be holding a Workshop for Board Members & Planning Department Staff on May 1st VII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:45 P.M. The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for April 4, 2001, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on April 18, 2001. Diana Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -4- HPB Minutes 4/4/01 F 12.',::r-t---•-,---r-, ,----:,-,- _ _ - _ _ - . _. _ .. _ HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: April 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: lll.A. - ITEM: Consideration of COA-439 Which Incorporates a Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Design Elements For a Proposed Band Shell, Concession/Restroom/Sound & Light Building, and Loggia as part of Old School Square Expansion Project. 1--- • - i t.v. 2rr, c N'._. 2ND 57. i1 I <I w1 i - g GENERAL DATA: ,zi c ) w' W I. 1 Owners City of Delray Beach .1 .<I z I ' 1pplicant Old School Square. Inc. "" IS- S' "` .11 S . agent Jose Aguila 3 m. Location North side of East Atlantic Avenue. between North Swinton Avenue Z MI and N.E. 1st Avenue _ Property Size 3.66 ( j ; i zIMI I Future Land Use Map Mixed Use and Community A T L A N TIC A V E N U E Facilities-Public Buildings i I I I I I Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) — - Adjacent Zoning....North: OSSHAD — .1 East: OSSHAD ` II South: OSSHAD i I MITI! 1 — West: OSSHAD S.N'. 1S-S-. S.E. 1S7 ST. _ Existing Land Use Old School Square, improved right- H I 1 1 I o III of-way and angled parking. _ —_01 ry Proposed Land Use Construction of a Band Shell; L_1 �Z L.- W Concession/Restroom/Sound & ; 1 i- t Light Building and Loggia with s NI _— associated landscaping. 1 �--� I -- S.Y.. 2t: S-. S.E. 2ND S-. `-1 Water Service Existing on Site. 1 i I 1 ; 1' 11 l l Sewer Servic= Ting c Site. I i 11 Existing)y ..� .,ire. i iii; d HJ il1 i, v , r i I , c, f — j _ III.A. The action before the Board is approval of COA-439, which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Old School Square Band Shell, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c): - Class Ill Site Plan Modification; Landscape Plan; Architectural Elevations; Waiver to the following requirement; 1. Land Development Regulation (LDR) Section 4.3.4(K) — to allow an increase to the maximum allowable building height of the band shell from 35' to 38' 8"; and, Variances to the following requirements; 1. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) — to reduce the setback of the band shell from the minimum 15' setback to 14'. 2. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) — to reduce the setback of the concession/restroom/sound & light building from the minimum 15' setback to zero feet. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of East Atlantic Avenue and Swinton Avenue (51 North Swinton Avenue). 'BA-CKG-ROUND; .._ The property consists of Parcel 1 of the Old School Square plat and a portion of NE 1St Avenue right-of-way. The Old School Square plat consists of 3.66 acres, which is located in the Old School Square Historic Arts District. The Planning and Zoning Board approved a site plan for the Old School Square Cultural Arts Center at its meeting on October 24, 1988. The Board approved the conversion of the former high school to a visual and performing arts center and theater. The proposal included conversion of the former elementary school to a museum. The physical improvements including the interior and exterior renovation of the buildings; a fountain; parking area modifications; and covered walkways. At its meeting on January 22, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Board approved a site plan modification. This modification included an amphitheater southeast of the performing arts building and a covered stage at the east end of the grass court created by the amphitheater. However, these improvements were never constructed and the approval expired. HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell—Class Ill Site Plan Modification Page 2 On January 22, 2000, a design charrette was conducted for the proposed expansion of the Old School Square facility. As a result of the charrette, a multi-phased master plan was developed. The participants included members the Old School Square Board, the CRA, representatives of the City, local design professionals, and the public. Phase I includes construction of an outdoor band shell/amphitheater, and ancillary support structures. A portion of the seating area will be located within the N.E. 1st Avenue right- of-way. Phases II and III of the Master Plan includes acquisition of the CRA parking lot, construction of a multi-level parking garage and additional cultural facilities. The City Commission approved the closure of a portion of NE 1st Avenue between NE 1st Street and East Atlantic Avenue at its meeting of March 6, 2001. The Commission approved the closure in order to accommodate expansion of the Old School Square facility and increase the grass seating area for the band shell. The closure/seating area consists of approximately the middle third of the block. The closure caused the elimination of one driveway to the CRA parking lot on the east side of NE 1st Avenue. This driveway will be converted to parking. A site plan modification to construct a band shell and concession/restrooms/sound & light building is now before the Board for action. a P_'R,OJFCIS D'ESCsRlP=TION`..._ . . ,; The development proposal consists of the following: ➢ Construction of a 5,000-square foot band shell that includes a stage, maintenance shop, restrooms, and loading dock. ➢ Construction of 3,700-square foot two-story concession building that includes restrooms and sound & lighting room in the second story. > Construction of a loggia that connects the Cornell Museum to the Crest theater. > Conversion of a portion of- NE 1st Avenue to grassed seating area and parking modifications to the remaining portions of the street. > Installation of a paver block sidewalk in front of the stage and a concrete sidewalk south of the stage that connects the CRA parking lot to the loggia on the west side of the facility. > Installation of associated landscaping. A portion of NE 1st Avenue between the band shell and the alley north of the Old School Bread Company will be converted to a grassed seating area. HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell—Class Ill Site Plan Modification Page 3 COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall be specifically addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development proposal. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the OSSHAD zone district: - Standard - Provided: Maximum.Building;Height 35' 38'8" * Minimum:Building-Setbacks Front 25' 150' Rear 10' 190' Side (Street) 15' 0' - 14' ** Maximum Lot Coverage 40% 23.5% Open Space - - 25% 54.2% * Refer to Waiver Analysis **Refer to Variance Analysis Building Height: Per LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the maximum allowed building height in the OSSHAD zone district is 35'. The proposed band shell exceeds the maximum building height as the mean height between the eaves and ridge is 38' 8" from grade. The applicant requests' a waiver from the building height 2.4.7(B), which allows the City Commission special powers to grant a waiver to any provision of these regulations when there is no other avenue for relief. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.4(D)(3), the Historic Preservation Board cannot approve a variance to the height regulations. Consequently, the applicant requests a waiver of the height requirements from the City Commission per the special powers provision. The Board is to make a recommendation to the City Commission regarding the additional building height. Waiver Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell—Class Ill Site Plan Modification Page 4 (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. The applicant has submitted a justification statement as follows: "...In this case, we have designed a stage to the anticipated audience which determines the proscenium opening size. The height is a relationship of the width and depth of the stage and in order to make the stage technically correct, the roof becomes 3'8"higher than allowed. It is important to note that the stage — in order to work — has been raised three-feet from grade partly causing this height issue. This building is within the context of the existing theater building and will be lower than the existing theater. Granting this variance (waiver) is not contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. It will not diminish the historic character of the Historic District or Site, and the variance (waiver) requested is the minimum necessary to effect the adaptive reuse—site expansion and use— of this site." The applicant submitted a separate letter in response to staffs technical comments that provides additional justification for the waiver as follows: "We are 38' 8" high measured to the mean distance of the roof slope from finished grade. Our finish floor is three feet above grade. The proscenium opening is a function of the width and depth of the stage. The stage is sized for the anticipated audience. The structure above is sized to clear span the stage. The roof at 4:12 slope is preferable for the installation of barrel tile. In order to make this design function as it technically should, the height cannot be reduced. Lastly, this roof does not exceed the height of the existing theater building and it- therefore in scale with its'surroundings." The Cornell Museum is approximately 32.5'-high to mean point between the eave and top of roof and is 41.5'-high to the top of the widow's walk. The overall height to the top • of the parapet of the Crest Theater is 44.91'. The proposed height of the band shell will not have a detrimental impact on adjacent properties with respect to shadowing or massing. The band shell is located on the east side of the block. To the east, across NE 1st Avenue, are the CRA parking lot and an existing commercial building. The massing of the band shell will not have an adverse impact on these properties. The additional 3' 8" in height will not create an unsafe situation, will enhance a public facility and will not result in a special privilege. The applicant has indicated that the height of the proposed band shell is predicated on the acoustics as well as the audience area and will be the optimal facility for this seating area. HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell—Class Ill Site Plan Modification Page 5 Variance Analysis: Building Setbacks: Per LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the required side street building setback is 15'. The proposed setback of the concession/restroom/sound & light building is zero-feet and a 14' setback is proposed for the band shell. The applicant has submitted a variance application to reduce the side street setback requirement for these two buildings. The applicant has provided a justification statement as follows: "As to the building setbacks, this project is the first phase of a three phase project which will include an eventual expansion to the east. Due to the timing of the property acquisition, we have sought — and received — approval by the Historical Preservation Board, and the City Commission for road closure of NE 1 s Avenue. Once the CRA property is successfully acquired, the road will be formally abandoned and the setback becomes a mute point." As noted in the background section of this report, the City approved the closure of a portion of NE 1st Avenue that is adjacent to the two proposed buildings. The reduction for the band shell is one foot. While the colonnade will have a zero-foot setback, it is an open space area covered pedestrian way, which is permitted to encroach into setbacks in commercial districts. Within the abutting Central Business District zoning district, there are no setback requirements. Therefore, the variances will not be out of character with the adjacent properties: The City,has no foreseeable plans to re-open NE 1st Avenue and will likely abandon the street when a master plan is approved for the property to the east. Regardless of the abandoned, the eastern property line adjacent to these buildings has effectively been "moved" to the eastern side of the right-of-way. The variances meet the required basis provided in LDR Section 4.5.1(J), regarding the preservation of historic character and the adaptive reuse of the property (see appendix A). Parking: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a), the proposed building additions and seating area are requires 147 parking spaces based on one space per 300 square feet to total new floor area and use/seating area. The parking requirement in the OSSHAD zone district does not realistically predict the parking demand generated by an outdoor band shell. A more realistic demand generated by the band shell is the requirement for an auditorium, which requires 0.3 parking spaces per seat. The applicant anticipates the band shell will serve 2,000 people. Given the auditorium calculation, the parking demand for the band shell will be 600 parking spaces. The required parking cannot be accommodated on the site. In order to accommodate the parking for this demand, the HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell—Class III Site Plan Modification Page 6 applicant proposes off-site parking via the Special Events/Facilities parking requirements. Off-Site Parking (Special Events/Facilities): In lieu of providing additional parking for the band shell, the applicant has submitted the attached parking plan as required by LDR Section 4.6.9(E)(4)(b) Special Events/Facilities, which requires approval by the Historical Preservation Board. According to the applicant, the proposed band shell will generate one to two events per month. The parking for these events are generally confined to the timing of the event. Most patrons will likely arrive shortly before the event and depart shortly after, thereby, returning parking to a normal pattern in the downtown area. The Parking Plan indicates that there are 1,852 public parking spaces available to the proposed facility in the downtown area. Of these 1,852 parking spaces 203 are located within 300' of Old School Square (CRA parking lot, Cason Cottage, NE 1st Avenue, and Worthing Park). There are additional parking spaces in close proximity that accounts for 555 parking spaces including City Hall, City Attorney, Community Center/Tennis Center, Bankers Row, and Hands parking lots. These parking spaces are located within 1,000' of Old School Square. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that there will be 758 parking spaces that are within walking distance of the band shell. With respect to the remaining public parking spaces noted in the parking plan, the City has no control over these spaces or are not located within a reasonable distance of the band shell. However, it is acknowledged that patrons will seek the closest available parking, which may cause parking further away from the facility. In order to encourage parking at City Hall, a lighting and pedestrian plan needs to be provided to ensure a sense of security and is attached as a condition of approval. Furthermore, signage that directs event patrons to City Hall's parking facilities should be provided during the events. The parking plan includes the provision of a shuttle service for special events. It is- acknowledged that some parking lots are under-utilized. This is due to the lack of signage as well as lighting, which is a safety concern. While some of the lighting must be upgraded in the lots, the pedestrian ways/sidewalks connects the lots to Old School Square need lighting so they are pedestrian friendly. The re-introduction of a trolley service and advertisement during these events will encourage people to park in satellite parking facilities. Other Items: FPL Easement: The property contains a Florida Power and Light (FP&L) easement along the east side of the site. The proposed buildings will be constructed over this easement. The applicant has indicated that FP&L has approved the construction of these buildings subject to encasement of the utility lines. The applicant must submit a letter from FP&L that approves of the proposed improvements and is attached as a condition of approval. HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell—Class Ill Site Plan Modification Page 7 Sidewalks: There is a need for sidewalks approximately mid-block from Swinton Avenue to the proposed loggia and new sidewalk adjacent to the museum. These sidewalks would provide a direct pedestrian connection from the parking lots to the west of the facility. A condition of approval is attached that the applicant provide two sidewalks from Swinton Avenue to the loggia. Turn-Around Space: The closure of NE 1st Avenue has created a "dead-end" parking tier on the north side of the closure. The southern parking space on the west side of the street must be converted to a turn-around around area for persons that are unable to find a parking space and is attached as a condition of approval. Loading Space: The Downtown Development Authority (DDA) has indicated that the southern area of NE 1st Avenue is utilized annually as a staging area for the Christmas tree. Containers used for the storing of the branches and lights are placed in this area while the tree is constructed and dismantled. Following discussions with the DDA and applicant, it has been agreed that an area will be provided in the southern area of the closure. This area needs to be stabilized sod, paver block or other suitable surface. A condition of approval is attached that the site plan be revised to indicate the container storage area along the south side of NE 1st Avenue closure and method of stabilization. Angled Parking Spaces: The site plan indicates that the angled parking spaces on the east side of NE 1st Avenue on the north side of the closure will be reconfigured for access from the north. The current configuration on the east side is from the south as the street is two-way. A condition of approval is attached that the site plan be revised to leave the configuration of these spaces in its current configuration or restriped as determined by the City Engineer. L:AN`DSCAPE PLAN -AN`ALYSIS; The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for the site that indicates the planting of variegated Ginger, Redtip Cocoplum, Pigmy Date Palms, and Podocarpus around the foundations of the concession/restroom building. Along the east side of the loading area wall a Cocoplum hedge is proposed and relocated Sabal Palms are proposed on the east side of the band shell. Additionally, Live Oak trees, Royal Palms and Sabal Palms will be relocated to the east side of NE 1st Avenue seating area. HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell—Class Ill Site Plan Modification Page 8 Several outstanding landscape comments remain to be addressed and are included as Landscape Technical Items. All other landscaping requirements have been satisfactorily fulfilled. Landscape Technical Items: The following Landscape Plan items remain outstanding, and will need to be addressed prior to building permit submission. 1. That the street closure is planted with St. Augustine "Floratam" sod and irrigated. 2. That the landscape plan shall be revised to be consistent with the site plan with respect to the boundaries of the NE 1st Avenue street closure. 3. That additional ground covers are provided in accordance with the City Horticulturist in order to be consistent with the City's xeriscape principles. 4. That the wall lighting on the columns shall be noted on the landscape plan. 5. That the landscape plan shall be revised to provide the spacing for all proposed plant material. .L_ rx_v DESIGN E.L=:EMENTS ,ANAL_YS:IS .. The proposed architecture can be considered Mediterranean inspired. The band shell contains a sloped roof with two towers.op either side of the stage. The roof contains a decorative parapet and raised stucco border with decorative medallion. The back of the band shell is a flat wall. The applicant has indicated that the wall is necessary in order to eliminate concerns with potential leaks with the flat roof of the support facility. The Board may want to discuss the architectural design of this northern elevation with the applicant in order to "soften" its appearance. The roof of the band shell and towers will have barrel tile to match the existing buildings. The towers will have wood "outlookers" painted white. The towers will have decorative tile inlay and openings for sound. The band shell support building is located behind the stage and contains a flat roof and a parapet cap. The-support building will contain windows'with muttons that will match the existing buildings and an awning over the loading dock. The exterior stage doors on the south and north side of the band shell will be aluminum and painted white. The band shell and support building will be stucco and painted to match the existing buildings. The concession/restroom/sound & light building contains the same architectural style as the band shell. The roof will be mission barrel tile to match the existing buildings. The sound & light portion of the building is contained within the second floor. This portion of the building contains a cupola with white aluminum louvers and barrel tile roof. The second floor also contains a balcony with decorative white aluminum railing that project from the face of the building. The roofline contains wood outlookers that will be painted white. The first floor contains windows with muttons and banding. The walls will be HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell— Class Ill Site Plan Modification Page 9 stucco and painted to match the existing buildings and have accent tile inlays. The arcade will have decorative columns. The building will have a raised stucco base. The loggia that connects the Crest Theater and Cornell Museum will cover a brick paver walkway. The loggia will have a barrel tile roof, outlookers, accent tile inlay, and decorative columns. The proposed improvements are designed to be compatible with the existing buildings with respect to architectural style and use of materials. While positive findings can be made with respect to the development standards of LDR section 4.5.1(E), the Board may want to discuss the north elevation of the band shell. 'RE`QUI'RED =FINDINGS ~t, as,._,. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c)(Class Ill Site Plan Modification), a Class Ill site plan modification is a modification to a site plan which represents either a change in intensity of use, or which affects the spatial relationship among improvements on the land, requires partial review of Performance Standards found in LDR Sections 3.1.1 and 3.2.3, as well as required findings of LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5). Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5 (G)(5) (Findings), with a Class Ill site plan modification formal findings under Section 3.1.1 are not required. However, a finding that the proposed changes do not significantly affect the originally approved plan must be made concurrent with approval of a Class Ill modification. The development proposal involves a band shell, loggia, and concession/restroom/ sound & light building additions to the existing Old School Square site. The proposed- site modifications are associated with a special event facility that, according to the applicant, will have one to two events per month. The architecture of the buildings is consistent with the existing Old School Square. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), these modifications do not significantly impact the previous findings as they relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency or the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with the Land Development Regulations was discussed earlier in this report. The development proposals minor impact on Concurrency items is discussed below. Traffic: The Old School Square is located in the City's Traffic Concurrency Exception Area, which does not require the project to comply with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards. As noted in the applicant's parking plan, the facility will have one to two events per month. The capacity of the facility will be approximately 2,000 persons per event. Therefore, there should be little or no impact on this level of service standard. HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell—Class Ill Site Plan Modification Page 10 Water: Water service is currently provided by an existing 8" main along NE 1st Avenue. Fire suppression is available from four existing fire hydrants. No main extensions will be necessary to serve this development proposal. Sewer: Sewer service is currently provided by an existing 8" main along the south side of the property. No main extensions or upgrading will be necessary to serve this development proposal. Solid Waste: With respect to solid waste, the proposed band shell does not conform to the typical calculations for waste generators since the facility will have only one to two events per month. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the waste generation per year. According to the Arenas generation rate the proposed 11,213 sq. ft. building additions will generate approximately 18.35 tons of solid waste per year (11,123 sq.ft. x 3.3 lb./sq.ft./year = 36,705.9 Ibs/2,000 lb. = 18.35 tons). The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of service standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: Future Land Use Element Policy C-3.1: The City of Delray Beach hereby acknowledges the role of Culture and the Arts in Economic Development-and pledges in pursuit of a theme of this Comprehensive Plan — A Renaissance Community — the promotion of the arts and accommodation of cultural activities for economic development ends. The expansion of Old School Square further promotes the arts and cultural activities. Thus, construction of the proposed improvements fulfills this policy. R,EVIE`M1W BY_yOTHERS:_'._ ::. . Downtown Development Authority: The Downtown Development Authority reviewed the project at its meeting of January 17, 2001. The Authority recommended approval subject to the provision of a designated area at the south end of the NE 1st Avenue closure area for the Christmas tree containers. HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell—Class III Site Plan Modification Page 11 Community Redevelopment Agency: The Community Redevelopment Agency discussed the proposal at its meeting of January 25, 2001 and recommended approval of the project subject to elimination of a drop-off area along the south side of the NE 1st Avenue closure. The revised site plan addresses the Agency's concerns by eliminating the drop-off area. Pineapple Grove Main Street Executive Board: The Pineapple Grove Main Street Executive Board reviewed the project at its' meeting on February 5, 2001 and had no concerns or objections. Courtesy Notices: ❑ PROD ❑ Presidents Council ❑ Chamber of Commerce Letters of objection or support, if any, will be presented at the SPRAB meeting. ASSESSMENT The development proposal is to construct a band shell, concession/restroom/sound & light building, and loggia. The proposal will enhance the Old School Square as a cultural and arts center. The restrooms will provide public facilities for other events offered at the site. The project will be an asset to the City and the downtown area. In order to address the parking requirements, the proposal includes implementation of a parking management plan. While the facility may operate one to two times a month, it will have a significant impact on the downtown area. The attached parking plan indicates that there are adequate public parking spaces in the downtown area to accommodate the increase demand. It is recommended that the City and Old School Square, Inc. implement a pedestrian/signage plan in order to encourage patrons to parking at and adjacent to City Hall. The variances to the building setbacks can be supported, as they are the minimum necessary to allow the adaptive reuse of the property and preserve the historic character. The height waiver is supportable as it will accommodate the acoustic requirements, and the band shell will not be out of scale with the balance of the Old School Square facility. However, the Board may want to discuss softening the north elevation of the band shell. The proposal is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Consistency with Chapter 3 and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations will be achieved provided the conditions of approval are addressed. HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell—Class III Site Plan Modification Page 12 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve COA-439 and the associated Class Ill site plan modification, landscape plan, and design elements for the Old School Square, subject to conditions. 3. Deny COA-439 and the associated Class Ill site plan modification, landscape plan, and design elements for the Old School Square, with the basis stated. RECOMMENDED AC_TIOfN. .. By Separate Motions: Waiver: 1. Recommend approval to the City Commission based on a positive finding to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5) of a waiver to increase the height of the band shell from 35' to 38' 8". Variances: 1. Based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1) grant the variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the required setback for the band shell from 15' to 14'. 2. Based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1) grant the variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the required setback for the concession/restroom/sound- & light building from 15' setback to zero feet. Site Plan: Approve COA-439 and the associated Class Ill Site Plan Modification for the Old School Square Band Shell, based upon positive findings with respect Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, and the Policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Submit three (3) copies of the revised plans addressing the conditions of approval. 2. That the applicant shall submit and implement a lighting and pedestrian plan between the band shell and City Hall parking areas. 3. That a letter shall be submitted from Florida Power and Light that approves of the location of the buildings. HPB Staff Report Old School Square Band Shell—Class Ill Site Plan Modification Page 13 4. That two additional sidewalks are provided from Swinton Avenue to the loggia. 5. That the southern parking space at the dead-end parking area on the west side of NE 1st Avenue is converted to a maneuvering area. 6. That the site plan be revised to note a stabilized sod (or other suitable surface) storage area for the Downtown Development Agency Christmas tree container. 7. That the existing angled parking spaces on the east side of NE 1st Avenue remain in their existing configuration or restriped in accordance with City Engineers directions. Landscape Plan: Approve COA-439 and the associated Landscape Plan for Old School Square Band Shell, based positive findings with respect to Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations, subject to the condition that revised plans be submitted addressing the Landscape Plan Technical Items listed in the report Design Elements: Approve COA-439 and the associated design elements for Old School Square Band Shell, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.18 and Sections 4.5.1(E)(8), subject to revision of the band shell elevation in accordance with direction by the Board. Attachments: • Site Plan, Landscape Plan,Architectural Elevations • Waiver Request Letters • Parking Plan • • :' �.. ... ._.._ CRITERIA_,0 t ORANTING._VARIANCES ry Pursuant to Section 2.4.7(A)(5), the Historic Preservation Board must make the following findings prior to granting a variance: (A) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings subject to the same zoning (The matter of economic hardship shall not constitute a basis for the granting of a variance); (B) That literal interpretation of the regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties subject to the same zoning; (C) That the special conditions and circumstances have not resulted from actions of the applicant; (D) That granting the variance will not confer into the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other lands, structures, and buildings under the same zoning. Neither the permitted, nor nonconforming use, of neighborhood lands, structures, or buildings under the same zoning shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance; (E) That the reasons set forth in the variance petition justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and, (F) That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with general purpose and intent of existing regulations, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Pursuant to Section 4.5.1(J), in acting on a variance request the Board may also be guided by the following as an alternative to the above criteria: (1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenances, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site. (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of a historic site or a historic district. (2) Or, as an alternative to Sub-Section (J)(1), that a variance is necessary to accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of a structure within a Historic District or upon a Historic Site through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (b) The variance would not significantly diminish the historic character of the Historic District or Site (c) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to effect the adaptive reuse of an existing structure or site. (3) The Board shall otherwise follow procedures and impose conditions as required of the Board of Adjustments. ,. I iC,Cc Licit eutr)Tor1 AvEIVE Robert O.Curds r— - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------_. - -- - - - — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Partnership,Ins. 1 ArdIRSCN,Minnow IIEId / M1Mw DCurds / v ■ ■■ LIUMEI IDODr"OLIO ICE ni_1L7L71t 7- Ul EI �„L iLf wIsnort CuJos rds,,,-li PIA it nna 1.Mtry4011 M °~ i.-C ________1 )e--1 I .0. .. �-t�w weeo.uar 1 ,.Y. 1 EXIST j 11. .10.1 Exl CREW \M,1 1 CO U1El [ THEATER �J i .i e + 1 M: 1 PROPOSED LOGGIA y I MIMI NX U PROPOlED — 1 r. PROPOSED • EFFORT I „�,,,�, J ; rACILRIEe d '� ONCEI(IONS 4 '"' �I I I OLD SCHOOL SOUND S LIONT OPEN I EnlnN. `�C 1 SQUARE Bu dNo SPACE J . . PACILN 11�f� ® EXITMASTER PLAN I ,._.. I,- - 1 e>tMr GYMIN' �` MODIFICATION BANDeN i/ I ��� 1 PHASE I h.E JIJ IJIJIJIJUIJU IL MTIAODR1An.OM ---RL eAwa@11 Y r-_ ... _ Al Ali I '.pI 11 l ° S�io�-r��- — — +-- iMMI■ I ur�rslwl■I■I■I►r1` ■Irrr■I■I■I■I■I■ ■Irli 61 — ------- --- ]IV-AVENUE a le I \a /o ( o . -- - _ ` D RAY DUCK,FL Ii ` Hrj I( II r 1 I 1 I ON SITE PLAN SCALE r.eo,c 1111,101 1/(.1 Y AREA CALCULATION CHART \`1�axiom 1 ER18T,BLD0 AREA 20,013 SF NEW AREA 11,21116E ..r. TOTAL BLDG AREA 71,5648E PARKING/ RNINOl PAVED AREA 74,ate SF 23 S% 219% f09At0u DN"G WATER BODIES 879 8f 0.1% SITE PLAN ®x VICINITY MAP TOTAL OPEN SPACE 55,441SF 54.29E (PROPOSED) TOTAL AREA 159,589 SF(US AC) 100% O514AR OI I NG A 000201 1 A1.01 / ' /�iilii/ �- i LCC i '4',' i[ O = ci Partnership,Ina, • j % WwixPtchINcts,W Merrier.and cdenHe Met TfaA,en tt.ta Dwgnrl / Robert OCunN AIA 1 / J,i.MIoa.M, ALA • d L_..�___.j. Jere Apulia AN 1 .1 his. 3.), T .,r..,ne. +,.. w • ieignitIiw. MIT..HDP • 4 1 Ip -},•„ OLD SCHOOL r--- __ MASTER PLAN PHASE 1 • • I ® II ® el: ! ® recu titi .! \ 1� \ , !# { t. ILIiB 1 , //��l�/������1, / DILRAY OUCH rFL f f I Ixlf1T.'Q ' .... ly W.V. I I ! " 11>,IA1Mf f 1�M'�q{== 1,:==; 1--- IPAADWILL WIVES OTt71AI Ap'1 J I I p!y i I I 7H+. F.4G . 11� �� N ww..rww rArnm �t!I J. I T r1 1I .. .. .rA.... 1 'I I I i 1 1 I �1 / L'MpiiMO!1•KLOEBD Du➢'M1CR • 4 \ __ 7 1w� —_� _— �� •— exisTR43 IfeRNC!Y /i� 1L .. ...-) r �7 s Trail DWG m Q, _ i 1 1'i 1'11 0.1 1,1 {ap � f --- II • .. t BANDSHELL :............. ... PLAN I LI�IIu11���/©. IIIIIII. CX1.Tra cr„WALL V,f MU.114.3.A,N (NOTED) y "awes, I MOM auN BANDSHELL PLAN 0.y il •101 WA.i.•.! 1 A2.11 - / \ P.M • clink I *."-'—— ■ .10 41n�.1 __r,.,,A.�.„..... Rob�tt0.0urrlE ■ If•..IM1VL.....re n.. Ferlrnnhlp,no. kthltsch,Mate ad Work+Wirers —'.' '.' � lINIKKII .. Robert sMSwad'H. AW Jewd. AN p __ Jou'ApA. AIA ISL Pi Flan E -� ' ■ :�,.. .W.. uunnullnunnuunllu «M°°« '• .m ——— ——� Mill „..,.y]'= • e ar , p lLC4 I, u,.a<,... T ., - MN rLD° IIIIIII II BANDSHELL NORTH ELEVATION *CAL!,M.4.111' WWI«urn MOM% e ID - ru..1e un■.R.waa /__-_- '1n OLD SCHOOL ----- ----- ..m. .. SQUARE IiI _ l..,n // IMI1b.111NOMREII� i — '•'•. '"'"""" MASTER PLAN -T �— •i, /� MODIFICATION —- / WM.n.ru.r.0 — -— f xy� Lc' • NMI.MEM II.VIII PHASE 1 / . 7 ...RO WT..W. DELMY!EACH,PL 1 BANDSHELL SOUTH ELEVATION ,N a 1„ MJLt 1/11'd'-1/' tom Ow 1 1.....4a11.0 .ram111111111141 -10fabr -ScL t j I . . II I 'ELEVATIOW b SECTIONS � , `III i ---- J -- I I p BANDSHELL EAST ELEVATION °e Wall% 1 Toen k' BANDSHELL WEST ELEVATION ■ 6G4L!I/V'.1'•E' er1Le Y■'.1'-�' a 0701■ A3.1.1 \ O c.'" 444' LL en .' '.,— v4R, -- Robert C.Currie ' o- - r V 0 U 4474 I Partnership Int — Cit. LAI Arliji4641j t i 4A _ p ® 1 kthltseti,Kennon e1e Robert 0 Curd* ALA 1 —I__ lwMtmAWt AU Joss'Agulls MA ' • 0— -IA gi tia gi eM 6 ,I 6 6 4 a @ a aa. 1\.\_t 'a AI -—0 • , A 'N 2 I.{tw1 I� I IM�q{�MtDw MN.ssl I iw b b b b b b o b b 11 N FIRST FLOOR NOTES PLAN • eca a In.r•r OLD SCHOOL SQUARE MASTER PLAN ' MODIFICATION PHASE 1 • .re. Y,r rr. ,,. Nal y DUIRAY HACH,FL o--- b-- L I . ..- al • , Iampritti t I iliinUIR It 0__......._.........._. i I mg* .. ____,_. ..___._T_____,__.__t__.__t__.__t_____T___&_._7----o ,..„._=. lel i •A",.. rs M _M vy 1 rd aye �r: I N IS 1� 9 , i ,...27,DWO I ® \\ 1 i 1 CONCESSION/ w. Mgt I I I I. RESTROOM I 1ST AND 2ND EliMiiiiMiiiiil FLOOR PLANS 0 0 b b b b b b b „ _ _ OBMAR01 I TG r N N al000�01 (1)SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR DINENSION PLAN 0020 6GLR vs..I'-e' eCIU!In0•1'•e' A2.2.1 A , • Y '-- . -- -- -P ���� Robert O.OutN i;;,• .__ _ _ Partnership,ha. a n»H,IMAM nr, n..wT►n..t eu kdiNnt.,Phnom r IIIIIIIIIIIIIiillllli IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII'IIIII . ttrierOrlpn.n �r11r�r•---.�r .• .—rr.r—i.�r. --�}uw No.o• Robert O Currie Al rwma PM. Jen MSow& Al Jose'Apeel Ale ii IIIII rnui..'iT.... KYHwr[(K -Rl rnr/0.—_—_—_—v..+,vv+wvs� .- w w .a.s-.a .... - ■ vv- -�-M.R RA �TH w.i..., w FAT ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION "^"”`"" 1 K • ..wiwM.K.,u i.• Pb -T twi Sunni_— —_—.—_—.—_ _—_—_—__..—.—_ .�-----�I ...MTTmr y „„„ era OLD SCHOOL SQUARE 6 +"'"R"" ! i!!!E mil !!!!!!!!!!!1!i!I!i!!!�llN.. MASTER FLM �._- .I!{ { 1 I 1 i - 1 -_ _ MODIPICATIOt 1 'tiia --- o 0 0 0 0 0 • -� - - - - - - - - - - PHASEI i 'i _1 1 0 i -rrerRxrr------— — SOUTH ELEVATION D[IRAY REACH,P 1 tow WINK 14.01.11 4 nMN•h.d4.M1. -�i . •. ._.... . ..........i..------------------------------- j g HM —�t ru. .—.— .—PUN— I —TTwy lu�r r. --- : IIll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlll IIIIIIIIIGI ___- .R�eRR �.r i —r —�ism . 0 ii:iiii:.iri iiiiiiiiiiiiirilir•iriiii:ii--i - S.'.or... Q W � T T091771!8 t CONCESSION SS +R nRR _� � • • -+y+ R,. ELEVATIONS 1 pmro n- P.M_pNU NON Puma ern NORTH ELEVATION 7.i0401 I m" a CONCESSION ELEVATIONS _ oeoior >sP.\\\ ece.l.t IA'.r•er — A3.2.1 / ccc c�c • i Robert 0.Currie Partnership no. A Roberto Ourre AtA Jo..,AJi II IA ugs AII, Jou'ApWI� AU CORNELL ...�.w 5 MUSEUM i,L'".:mA,. ",.�...«... 111Z•ri••wn.r4 1-14 o i l 111.1. It PON _ —— .. am__ CREST THEATER . RX` —.J�-K:.L L�`4:�, _a, IMP •_ _—L—_ 4I it r y '[j—D." ever kI°L y I I I I I I I I 1 Its .w OLD SCHOOL SQUARE MASTER PLAN IS MODIFICATION 1 (E)H LOGGIA PLAN r PHASES $CALrr v.r.r.•' 4 V N pp ` MY UMCH,Pt. V Ma PM I4Hi0 Y.. MH=MM H •I t. ee .. NAVIN.RI tiny .w,w% yv. I C�O'nfIlLl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 issli nxrew —— '—_ i�'�'�' ' _ - AM 11QlAiLll A n709a1)I ow. LOGGIA FLOOR L000IA EAST ELEVATION PLANS MD eeue w'.r•r ELEVATIONS 08MAROI 1 .91.0011 000101 1 • A2.3.1 \ r • C �® c e RETIE!TIE!1 LSSOWIES,I landscape Architecture Lena Pinning • ■ C�:. 3 ■0:�t ANINIS.4`/A M•1•10;01—••• iIIIii ,e4 l!faMMA 1 AMM_VIE =/EIII�I.*1111 r'� ► Rarironmentel Assn I' ❑❑•11iTi■ II- • i■ d ■wtaiiI1► . . aiiiri■�ilti is .1' 4♦ a lai■❑❑► r .k Si o <1 P • n •4III ■ �dt �" •-a q■ I sm Inns n.ra e.r / jI . e u n.a. mean a n `4 gm �, (Lev-nx dr(m)ev-Tsn ‘if is �f it Ind[New... .v,r .Y,.ta• —;; ur.,swnew VW 11.! „iR^ PO VI-ow Az(slim rsee • %i ail I do 1 ,t L. ,t OLD 'P #' 1 li O ti— ' _ �' SCHOOL{ SQUARE . I ell s # + \ A t / f (IL . Q n y .... ° —T I i a ' p-- ne t q -_ v uk, WM �pt \Rea 6 r I•..T • .ifA..004c, ) I I ts ♦/ ' alr g� \! III II _' S mom. MN r1.719 e;q!a...;dG x ❑t►�r��li_ ii��ii��G c �! �DnG j CC o'''Ti r.'n •.'■■s_— e a.■ e, ;ta11 =.�iitMF!'. a'l • fitIirt•aiii • fI,Ill!I!ti Ill Ed r [ I 1 6 n r \ a 1 K `JI d i,",, KR,A 6 4 ▪ - L eu+ i C KEY 6CIENTInIt:NAME CAMiO1 NMIE Oil" NT 5!' M y Aq'0 Existing eabel Palm to Be Relocated/R vend - Alp Alpinla zerveeet Variegate' Variegated Ginger 34 36' 3Pl' •MeV/ WlO! GFy CFryeobelnrue Iceea'Recap' Redllp Gocopko 66 7d' IT' .— T •[V` Exhales Royal Palm to De Relocated Pod Podourpue mauop.ylta Podocarpu. 1 5' 3O' Master Qv Ouerox vrasIdEM Live Oak 1 Relocated non On 5lto ,\ Re Roye.toela eiata Royal Date 9 Relocated non O,51te pM j r Rob Phoenix roebelenll Pigmy Dale Palm 2 6' 5' Triple Te k Landscape. ii ( + 1 trainees Live Oak to De Relocated 5p 5abnl palmetto Sabel Palm 5 Relocate beet a of IS nc r On 51te / Rnl Reloraled Plan i j trainees Tree/Palm to Renal, N Y fl ▪VI MU • • L-1 a* di CITY a AT TORNEY - BUILDING _ MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.DRIVE N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 2ND ST. �r > > < < . MN w 4J > — o a I Q Q w 0 N a N ' F- I-- — Z I `n CITY — , hi w HALL L.; I z z— 0 3 z Z 0 — w 1 r 1ST ST- .__. COMMUNITY 3 >:: : ::: :: ::i:i::• > o o z CENTER z :::>::::>:::: >::>:::::::<:■ c z Z— w • J �i 1 a TENNIS :... w vi vi— STADIUM, z ' -1/11/,' [' I . C ATLANTIC AVENUE SOUTH Ww 1 I H l C v-J COUNTY ti- p COURT HOUSE w w w ::(73 . Li a r > > Q Q S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. J o - BUD'S a Z N r ... , .. O F 1- in to F- Vj c . N N V N ti . Z o — p N 3 w W N Vi Vi S.W. 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND I ST. it I I 0ft 1•111 I < .p z - I w I w . o N o //j/c / " m I Li vi cn■�ININI S.W. 3RD ST. S.E. 3RD rII/ iST_� —_, MERRITT I PARK f N -aimi-- OLD SCHOOL SQUARE EXPANSION • CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PHASE 1 PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM5OB HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD STAFF REPORT Project Name: COA-440, Lisa Hopkins, Owner Project Location: 330 S.E. 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is to consider a change in exterior color for the mass of the residence, and to consider a change in paving material from asphalt to loose rock, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(d). BACKGROUND This non-contributing residence was constructed in 1956, and is a one-story masonry structure composed of three, hipped roofed sections that join to form an "L" shaped plan. Wide overhanging eaves provide definition to the cornice. PROPOSAL/ANALYSIS Paint Color. The color for the major wall surfaces and trim has been changed from white to a soft lime green for the mass, and white for the trim . Aluminum storm shutters have been removed for the painting, but will be reinstalled at the start of the hurricane season. They are white with vertical stripes of an aqua color. The color of the stripe will be changed to one that complements the new house color. The applicant will bring the color chip to the meeting. As no specific palette has been specified for the Marina Historic District., and as the home is not within the period of significance described, the color is not in conflict with any prescribed historic formulas. Driveway. The owner has replaced an asphalt driveway that was in considerable disrepair, with loose rock (white in color), without approval. Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 6.1.4 (D)(1) allows for driveway surfaces other than concrete or asphalt. The paragraph states that when the alternative surface is loose rock (i.e. Chatahoochee) and there is a sidewalk in front of the property, the f loose rock shall be limited to the private property side of the sidewalk (no loose stone in the right-of-way.) The driveway is an at-grade feature that minimally impacts the character of the property. The replacement of the deteriorated asphalt improves the overall appearance, and providing that it meets the requirements of the Building Department and City Engineer, is a positive change to the property. Meeting Date: April 4, 2001 Agenda Item: IV.A. HPB Staff Report COA 440—330 SE 7th Avenue Page 2 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction _2 Deny, with reasons stated. 2. Approve as presented. RECOMMENDATION Based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), approve the change in the exterior color, and the surface material for the driveway, subject to approval by the City Engineer and Building Department. • T ii -� I--l I I I--): (...I=--I,' kIs.''-,1 1 n.:U�:Sc 1,-1i4 s 2 'I 144--: .4.rn t:. Y.lazs-,y+--21-I-7 t::1�^,:.':�-....- ._ _ 1 ATLANTIC r AVEN - - - - - - • , . , 1 1 n I 1 1 n p i I 1 i • a@s0 1995 J 50�,.1�3t��•1939. ,11 I—I i i I I f �,r 1 1,....7. ,I 1 1925 1 I 1 I ! 1 1 I r.r<.r. Ern= 1 1 Ii i somc 1935 1960! — 193P 1940 I ll 925:i, • ---- > G• - -1939: 192E a jr —�V a.u4p�1441 !` ,S2E ,926 :- 1.--; L 19E, Ii 92_ ...1 SJ! f — ' • ,ccc t9"5 1 1 - � 1439 _•1 k1= 1925 1 193: _1 _/ '1940 11 f. 193E �I 1947 j IG r jj ScheciuIed for c7n,411ltor :, 17 1325 - 19 • '1947 �� rr a4 _I 124.132&14_1\1unn:V.`: IF r' �,? i I! To be r:oiuct c 11'itn M::nn: I eea.v:. ,'S3 lblcnilotttes _ i it r. tc. nI ...54 I"+ i94„ -a� I 1^ I � i - - - , T - 1= lI ` �. — 1c ^' 1953 a- If _ II _ . ,95E — ,97:: 5 19E If ,.-: :,_-..- —__;r_______ -- _ i 195.Z - =195c1 192E li — J _ it I= ___I ==.-- • . : 1 i.:..:: ; N MARINA HIS" ?ice DISTRICT ar�,-iinet__-. I - �'01\!T UE-7L'T11`2-. ._... -\."E_ PT.B'J1— - i. • o . ;1-G GE- E- ,:- i` o ' l tAitt t#v0 1 Ei51-wt57) _ r 4104-e 135. �� �.Cnszt 0 Mo^;ui-4wE^r7 i c •4U.1 LAIC. I 1 5/ G i'1 CrtubI l 3S,g' r rw7T i a +v�sie� P���� e v 2 . H rLo.>L n \ --` • st4.)Sc•;1. iL.7: M Lbs/.‘r 4•1 • / _ Prtn.Le_ t ') - 0 1 • ZL 't'• . 14.3 .1.1 i . .• if ..�+ -�►i it - Ci ( N i - 1 ,'i• j -4-- 'r"- , 7:-.von. -v \- f , • 3 J t `F '4::,1 2 _ t . u 'S c -o&u P S// rtO 4c4P #'-trzq°J � t=acreU 0 C ouGi2E'i- C 1 ii. 1 , •.:':.•'...::••••• •••::1::•, • ...,::;.:;:•....:',.'...•••:...;.• • • „ '' ''.'4•711".4-.Y-•.•,. •••:•.,J,k.4_. ' "•,.7' .,,, !„,*1 4,",,•,,3• '.11,‘' . ,,; ,4,C.,,,„,t, . .'•'•-;.,',,i"•'. , M'V'''''' • , '' ',• 14it','.'er,Vi" '" .,..44,)•, ...3,13,,,(43,V.W4. 0'.p ...'!",%.‘",.,, .,•,e41'1. - -,• ...1,,4,7 4)..r,•L 0:1:hi ts. '741" ' •'',,, •, ,.,V.,.„ '''4.1 ,..4.',.,..,,,,,.'t' ,.."f: ,,,' ' '..E'4A.V.' 4 *,,,„.,, ..rj,,i.,,,fitv, , ..,,,J , , ,,,,.I, ,„,,,,p4 ,...,,,i!,1,,,,,,..,,,' „„,,,,4,6„ , , ,.., , ,i.,...,-1,1! . ':Ts,' ''''' '`'; •••4 '',J,•^•• '..;i. ' ''.....;,,,,.... 1.3,.; 'i i 0,,,'.1. ., I - ,' • • ••••••4 46 i, ' ..,'.'..itilaf0.;,':•:;10...A••0 •••• '. ;OK, ,‘11c1.1,"PI' • i 4 .I 1.•.'. 1,'.I:, & *':‘,••.,,..:11,..1:'''it:4 • •,.. ,.., • '01-3„,-",••' i, ,- . ;..'s.• .-i e- ^i,e, 3 ' , . . ' • •-• i ,. . •.,,i...;• •" 1: .2i, , .... „,v„. .. . .. i . • ..,.....4","- • k*. 16 . f Itk 4 ',• '' '' ' ' • "'.'' 7i,:•'"••-:-' ''' • ..C. Ilk.',.4.:";•., • 4. .1,• I :• . , ' •' ',,..;•.1 ......44/ - • . - -.. . v.... 44' i ;,.. • .., 4 . • .,.. ..',;' ,-,i,... ',Ft' . .1 ' MI ...... .,, -- ---._ . _____ . • ,.. • •-• --. _ •••.--.:•-•7: • :, ,...... ft•-•-•----- t • • '' ' ' ' ' ‘. , ‘ ' ice,. pliwr. -; . , . „ ,•'' ,•,--rir-", '.-F • `tt' ';: ...;..f:Li!......7.7.....:,.....1,&:-....,.....;:::•—..— , ,. . i „,,. 1,....—I1:::—• — 1 I • • . • • • " ,. . ' . .. , . . . . ..:•.•. ... .. „••••• •. . . 4,. . rt,r , •4 ; i7.-f' . - • • — a \• ' •• • • ... i . ••.•, Srt. ' • --,,-33:40741111 • • • '...•-,,A•n43,- .,•,1.'""1 ; ' •..•,.,.• 4. ' , • . , ''''` ' ..-1-.••• • .•.• ..—"-' ' ',:r..Cii:,•;•,.',4:10,,I.ItIl';:,;11;:;(;(03y..";,c0.‘,;1,4:1,:k),.;,';;;?,;,•;,,..., :.% Pr,' • .; ,,) .,. ., ... :',"0•••r',';',;' — 7-:;'':',,,,:•,,,- .• .3.t.0..,t,, . '1 —• • . '1. 1'k Vs1.1iiest,1%4 ' .'ii",IttiT•••`ti'''ll'a•Y•4;`;.si'v•ilt .••;•.1,..; • , ., • • . •. , ,, • P:c,;P:';','.7:Is-1 •P••,t••••).,,e...• •P• i•;''01,••‘,,,14,0•te,)ititas .Pk....4., t..,i.,P 2•, • • • • ( , . .A'. . • .P.•. ..,1':•tr,••••'',A •;',Wiri•hitc,%. . , • ,, r•k.'.ri 4 4••••,,,,,,,,...,,;.;/` •••,••:,f,t',A...c.;,.,.4.,••444.s ,,.,. l• ••• • . . . ,• ‘, .:;'•...;'••••strir.•!,,l',,i 1;4 s•tIP': ik•P,;•et•i'47'••••'; .'•'',,i''''', • • . .., :••••." ';;1'., ,, --••••-• .,, .•,„„:, ,• ..t...,,,,...., •,sis• ,.4,,rp .4 , ,!., .1/ % r ‘ , . • . ' ' . ;. .,, , : .... 0 -..:,,I....,,vii.,-•..,!....;:....v. r :,....i . ..,,ot.: ,,a•4...• ."14.^ IV i itl..,t 3,; •;.4 ' . 1 . .• .t.' ...111 . . 4 • .' • •• • '' I . !).. .‘ ... '. . ,t ,, , 4 PC...."r.'.1.' ' - - - --- ,. . „ . . • . .. .... ... . . . . . I • • .. . ,i .'t-'', i ' . ...• . , . „.. .; .. 1•. .,•,a;,,,A„,..0,1,,,,2,::jr,,i,.1,-:,...,',,,,i.. ,..t,.t.i.„-::,'q"..;,•';', • ; ' ; '..',' .' "/;i'ei',;tii,";•;),,P,P'd ii;;f : ,,e.s'.47.0'.•;40:.,,;,;,`•,;),,, ,;,,,, . , .., , . . i,!.• ;:';4:-..11;,..';.-4,,,,„.,,',CO ;,E1„kl'e•,',1:,_*)•;,:s!.;•";'• ;:-•;t.0 l'i;,;;;•;.;.-1,..!: . , ,• ;. • 1 , ,•'. . ....i,„(..•.',•,....`. . R , I):Ai. I, '';SS..^ (4,'k rl:,1' ,''' '...":':.'-• ' Adiatui; „ „,,,,,i , ,71 •4 /I „ ,i.,;,, 1,„-c.. i,.. r •• stz%I, 3 • • • • '(414P.:',' .:••• ' ..'' het- 1,1.. , H' I. '•-;:il.':',:l''. ' ' I •P -••,i• •••eA 1 1..i.• ..'a,.,•,...-• ...., ,;4.:•ii, •••••••'..e.,: sr•-•". ,:i7:33,•Ac 40 t; 4.9d,,•••'.;„. • •.,,„, , .:• "•:.'••-'••.),-.••••tz'''! •rb.,'Irr,,,1;9•3••••;$'''''''''. ',`,'31'41,,•;,4•Z-ic.":il!'',t',%44.6,TNI. ' •,'"‘i• v'T••.,,r.',.•:,6,• .i. 3• ,,,,,,,_„,,k,r., . .. . •'..• ,i•••4/ kt. 4'i‘ ?lk=•2,,',V(.;1"...,; ';,! •'.1r.'',.',V‘:11.;...;,?..'-' ,1,',..,,..::',,,,',,,;,'ff.iL .A - • 'h."; ,• ' t',._ ..., •-...,. ..' ,.... ,.., Ylv:',;;,\'; 74}6S4'?' 1A4'k,4-,: ,, WNW• hil I ,,, fi,:, t, '' . -.4:1ii'l 4. 4-, •P•:0',,lk 1• ' •'' .1.''''.,iiP'c•;.••"',3*/*;`;' ?ii,11'4 3i .3.3.314 f \ Al 1"4:.." ; ' • 4.- •? 4 ' i•"4,, . .' „,.4.„ '.i. . , ...) ..... . . ...."....,.t.„........ , , - taw vow.. r •,,. .. • ,Alrbaya,..r 1 ,•,' .3"*.• /, - ,.. .._........, — .ti;•.:",..:i.,, ',,`"SJIit',.;4st ; • - . , . . , ,., ... ...... . ..• . 1,t1., • I . .. 3 . " • ' ' . I i I 1 , , '.rh-:"' • P•••• • , I - . "" I It r.. 1 ) .•1— I , . , •• . I '...•, • 4.;'''• I' , 3, ,fal:,'!1 -- ,• , . .. 4 . • . , • .J."-;. . t . -1,l'i'.'• ,. .-tt . . • ' •,..'•• - ' .... . .. .. :....- • 4 P j•,,., .•••1 . .. .,t 1, 1, g teli••• 'F4411/t4;V441' !fr...,41t)a..W k.t1;1*°. ,, ,,,. .f,o'''' Ti I•4 t,',:i4i,:Zti:c3A,Tt'-Ilic4' 441 N / N k ' "."'Y ''.?. .'. i,•',.. ,'4,4 I 44.•,,,,,,,J10;44412, V.13tirit.L ,' "...Weir. 4'''',''T:..i.,,""Y. ''' - ,„, - ..: