Loading...
HPB-03-20-02 (3) MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: MARCH 20, 2002 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:03 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Mary Lou Jamison, Gloria Elliott, Mike Simon, Donnamarie Sloan, Jim Keavney (did not vote). MEMBERS ABSENT: Gail Lee McDermott, Rhonda Sexton, STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Debra Garcia II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Cason Cottage Complex, 5 NE 1st Street, Old School Square Historic District, Mary Swinford, Delray Beach Historical Society. Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is that of approval of a COA which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for the Cason Cottage Property, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c): • Class III Site Plan Modification; and • Landscape Plan. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board. Mary Swinford, Executive Director of the Delray Beach Historical Society, and Andy Owen, architect, were present to represent the project. Ms. Shay stated that color and elevation changes will return to the Board. Ms. Jamison inquired about relocating the Bungalow 10' to the north in order not to obscure the view of Cason Cottage from N. Swinton Avenue. 24102 '- Mr. Owen discussed the existing and proposed landscaping. Site Plan Modification After a detailed discussion, it was moved by Ms. Sloan, seconded by Mr. Simon and passed 4-0 to approve the COA for the Class Ill site plan modification for the Cason Cottage Property, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) and (Findings) and Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1) That a bike rack be provided. 2) That the building be moved 10' to the north if there is no interference with the existing tree. Landscape Plan It was moved by Ms. Sloan, seconded by Mr. Simon and passed 4- 0 to approve the COA for the landscape plan for the Cason Cottage Property, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16. B. Fischer Properties, 27-43 S. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board The item before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for the Fischer Properties, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): • Class V Site Plan; • Landscape Plan; • Design Elements; and, • Demolition of noncontributing outbuildings. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board. Michelle Balfoort, architect and authorized agent, and John Szerdi were present to represent the project. Ms. Balfoort presented color samples. -2- HPB Minutes 3/20/02 Ms. Shay requested that the four colors chosen be varied between the four buildings and possibly a new color introduced. Mr. Szerdi reviewed the landscape design. Ms. Shay stated that the landscaping should not block the front facade of the building obscuring a view of the building from the right-of-way. Ms. Shay stated her concern over the installation of copper roofs as they were not appropriate to the neighborhood and do not continue the feeling of a neighborhood owned by different individuals. Ms. Balfoort and Mr. Szerdi felt that the buildings with their respective alterations would not stand out. Mr. Simon inquired about the State requirements. Ms. Shay stated that the State requires in-kind replacement. Ms. Jamison concurred that she does not agree with the installation of cooper roofs and that there were no cooper roofs historically in Delray. Ms. Balfoort stated that the lifespan of an alternative roof, such as cedar, is not economically feasible. A detailed discussion regarding appropriate roofing material ensued. Demolition It was moved by Mr. Simon, seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 4- 0 based upon positive findings with respect to LDR 4.5.1(F)(1) to approve the demolition of the two outbuildings located on Lots12 and 14 of the subject property. Site Plan It was moved by Mr. Simon, seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 4- 0 to approve the COA for the Class V Site Plan for the Fischer Properties, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) and (Findings) and Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: -3- HPB Minutes 3/20/02 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That a Declaration of Unity of Title must be recorded for lots 11- 15, Block 69, town of Delray prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) That a bike rack be placed on site. 4) That decorative site lighting fixture details are provided and that the light locations be indicated on the site and landscape plans. 5) That the site plan must be revised to show the relocation of the utilities underground. 6) The mulch paths, adjacent to Buildings B & C, will need to be replaced with pavers in order to comply with handicapped accessibility requirements. 7) That a revised traffic statement be submitted that accurately calculates the vehicular trips generated from the conversions from residential to commercial/restaurant. Landscape Plan It was moved by Mr. Simon, seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 4- 0 to approve the COA for the landscape plan for the Fisher Properties, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following condition: 1) That all proposed landscaping will not interfere with the line of site of the front façade from the right-of-way on Swinton. Design Elements It was moved by Mr. Simon, seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 4- 0 to approve the COA for the design elements for the Fischer Properties, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1 and 4.6.18, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the design elements for the rehabilitation of the extant historic structures be developed in line with the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. -4- HPB Minutes 3/20/02 2) The architectural details associated with the current carports must be incorporated into the new elevation changes to ensure the retention of the original architectural configuration. 3) Seek alternate materials for the roof of each structure. Alternate proposals for the roofing materials must be brought back to the Board for review and approval. 4) The exterior board and batten clad addition on Building B should be reconfigured to present a more compatible design with the two types of siding to ensure that there remains a differentiation between the enclosure and the original structure. C. Forman Building, 334 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Claudio Camilucci, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a hanging sign for the Forman Office Building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board. Mr. Camilucci was present to represent the project. Mr. Simon inquired as to how the sign is attached to the post. Mr. Shay stated that it will hang on a chain and be attached with eyehooks. It was moved by Ms. Sloan, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 4-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign for the Forman Office Building, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7. (G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. D. Patrick Lynch Residence, 226 S. Ocean Boulevard, Nassau Street Historic District, Roger Cope, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I site plan modification for changes to architectural elevations and site improvements to the Patrick Lynch Residence, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board. The applicant is requesting the construction of a gable entrance on the guest -5- HPB Minutes 3/20/02 cottage and site improvements throughout the property including the construction of privacy walls and paver walkways. Roger Cope, architect, was present to represent the project. Ms. Shay read a request by a neighbor in the Nassau Park Historic District to consider the pervious and impervious areas as the proposed changes to the driveway will cause runoff to flow into and down Nassau Street. She further stated that the City is addressing her concerns with upcoming improvements. Ms. Shay requested additional information regarding the location of the wall on the north property line. Mr. Cope clarified where the wall footings will lie. Mrs. Katz, neighbor to the north on South Ocean Boulevard, requested that the Board review the height of the proposed privacy wall. Mr. Cope felt that 6' was appropriate despite the fact that the building code allows an 8' wall. Ms. Shay inquired as to whether the wall facing South Ocean Boulevard should match that found on the property to the north as it steps down where the two meet. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the location and height or the proposed privacy walls. It was moved by Mr. Simon, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 4- 0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for the Patrick Lynch Residence based upon positive findings with respect to the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, pursuant to LDR Sections 4.5.1. (E)(4), 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(h). E. 17 NW 4th Avenue, West Settler's Historic District, Delray Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, Diane Dominguez, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the non- contributing structure at 17 NW 4th Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). -6- HPB Minutes 3/20/02 Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board. Thuy Shutt, CRA, was present to represent the project. Ms. Shutt stated that the demolition is requested to accommodate the Atlantic Grove project. The CRA inquired about relocation but found it economically infeasible. After much discussion, it was moved by Ms. Sloan, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 4-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness request for the demolition of a non-contributing duplex located at 17 NW 4th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. F. Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation, 20 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Bonnie Dearborn, Representative from the Florida Division of Historical Resources. Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing sign for the Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board. Ms. Jamison questioned the proposed height of 7' and felt that the height might be inappropriate. Ms. Shay stated that the sign can be reduced per the Board's discretion. After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Simon, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 4-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing sign for the Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.6.7(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), and (H)(2)(a-c) of the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards subject to the following • condition: 1) That the overall sign height be reduced to 5'. G. 30 SE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Michael Strauss, Owner. -7- HPB Minutes 3/20/02 Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of existing windows, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board. Michael Strauss, owner, was present to represent the project. Mr. Strauss stated that he received bids ranging from roughly $9,500 - $21,000 for wood core, vinyl or aluminum clad windows throughout the house. He was concerned that it would be cost prohibitive to replace the existing windows with wood core, vinyl clad windows. Ms. Jamison asked Mr. Strauss if he considered a loan from the CRA for the cost of the windows. Mr. Strauss was unaware of the availability of CRA loans. Ms. Shay inquired about placing wood frame windows on the front façade only. Mr. Strauss stated that the front windows are arched and require custom construction. Ms. Shay stated that Mr. Strauss has returned to try and find an alternative rather than appealing to the City Commission despite the fact that the paperwork for a hardship has been submitted. After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Simon, seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 3-1 (Jamison dissenting) to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness request to remove the existing jalousie and awning windows and install new 6/1 and 4/1 single hung sash windows for the contributing structure at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(c) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines with the following condition: 1) That the window frames be constructed of wood core, vinyl clad along the front elevation facing SE 1st Avenue and aluminum on the sides and rear elevations. Ill. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: -8- HPB Minutes 3/20/02. None B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: Ms. Jamison inquired about the 28' height limit recommended by the Board for the Fontaine Fox properties directly adjacent to the historic residence. Ms. Shay confirmed that it was to be the first two newly proposed residences only. Ms. Shay further requested that specific conditions of approval based on the Land Development Regulations be stated for all variance approvals. Ms. Jamison inquired about administrative paint color approval. Ms. Shay confirmed that light purple was approved for a property on North Swinton Avenue. D. Staff: Dan Sloan presented a logo for the Historic Preservation Board. The Board reviewed various graphics for a Board logo. The Board discussed traffic calming measures in the historic districts. IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:00 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for March 20, 2002, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on July 2, 2003. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -9- HPB Minutes 3/20/02 < yt 4P AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: March 20, 2002 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Cason Cottage Complex, Old School Square Historic District, Northeast Corner of N. Swinton Avenue and NE 1st Street, Mary Swinford, Representative Delray Beach Historical Society. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for a Class III Site Plan and Landscape Plan for a proposed relocation of a contributing building for office space. B. Fischer Properties, Old School Square Historic District, 27-43 S. Swinton Avenue, Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for a Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements for the proposed rehabilitation of four contributing structures for conversion to office/retail and restaurant use including a demolition request for two outbuildings. C. Forman Building, Old School Square Historic District, 334 NE 1st Avenue, Claudio Camilucci, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign. D. Patrick Lynch Residence, Nassau Street Historic District, 226 S. Ocean Boulevard, Roger Cope, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I Site plan Modification for the addition of a gable roof entrance on the main structure, construction of a perimeter wall, and a concrete paver parking lot and walkways. E. 17 NW 4th Avenue, West Settler's Historic District, Delray Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, Diane Dominguez, Authorized Agent. . HPB Meeting March 20, 2002 Page 2 Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition of a non-contributing structure to accommodate the proposed Atlantic Grove development. F. Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation, Old School Square Historic District, 20 N. Swinton Avenue, Bonnie Dearborn, Representative from the Florida Division of Historical Resources. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign. G. 30 SE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Michael Strauss, Owner. Re-consideration of a COA request for the installation of 6/1 and 4/1 aluminum windows on a contributing structure. III. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff IV. ADJOURN �� J J jr (I Wendy Shay, Hi uric Preservat n Planner POSTED ON: March 14, 2002 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for the Cason Cottage Property, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c): ❑ Class III Site Plan Modification; and ❑ Landscape plan. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of N. Swinton Avenue and NE 1st Street. BACKGROUND Located in the Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD) zoning district, the subject property consists of the south 32' of lot 5, and lots 6-8, block 67, Town of Delray plat. The property contains a 1,507.3 sq. ft. frame building, the Cason Cottage Museum, along with a nine space asphalt parking lot, 34 stabilized sod parking spaces, and two bus parking spaces. In 1988, the HPB approved a COA for the conversion of the 1915 cottage to a museum. In 1992, the HPB approved a site plan modification for the construction of the parking that exists on the property. The Delray Beach Historical Society is in need of office space and is currently renting the first floor of the Judge Knott Center. After consideration, and based on the advice of a house museum consultant, they proposed the relocation of an historic building to the corner of N. Swinton Avenue and N.E. 1st Street just to the west of Cason Cottage, facing NE 1st Street. The lot is 131' deep and Cason Cottage is located on the eastern portion of the property allowing sufficient room to house an additional structure. Due to the fact that the City owns the property, it was necessary for the City Commission to approve locating an additional building on the site. During the meeting of November 3, 1998, the HPB recommended to the City Commission for the relocation of an historic building onto the southwestern portion of the lot shared by the Cason Cottage. PROJECT DESCRIPTION . The development proposal entails the following: ❑ Relocation of the 1,209.3 sq. ft 1925 Bungalow style building (currently known as the Lavender Shutters building) from its current location at 122 SE Sixth Avenue to the subject property; o Conversion of four stabilized sod parking spaces to asphalt; o Modifications to the existing asphalt parking area involving relocation of the handicapped accessible spaces and elimination of three standard spaces; and, ❑ Installation of paver brick walkways and landscaping. HPB Staff Report Cason Cottage -Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan Page 2 SITE PLAN MODIFICATION ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the OSSHAD zone district: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 17' Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 25' 25' Side (Interior) 7.5' 58'4" Side (Street) 15' 67'9" Rear 10' 161'7" Open Space 25% 59.99% Parking: LDR Chapter 4.4.24 (OSSHAD-Special District Regulation): Pursuant to LDR 4.4.24 (G)(4)(a) all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. The relocated 1,209.3 sq. ft building in conjunction with the existing 1,570.3 sq.ft Cason Cottage (2,779.6 sq.ft. total) require a total of 10 parking spaces. The required parking will be provided in the 6-space asphalt parking lot and by converting 4 stabilized sod parking spaces (previously excess spaces) to asphalt. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: LDR section 4.6.8 (Site Lighting): Site lighting in compliance with Section 4.6.8 currently exists on the property. Any additional lighting can be administratively approved. Bike Rack: Pursuant to LDR 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided at any non-residential use within the City's TCEA (Transportation Concurrency Exception Area) which, though the development review process, is determined to generate a HPB Staff Report Cason Cottage -Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan Page 3 demand. In addition, Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan requires bicycle facilities on all new development and redevelopment with particular emphasis on development within the TCEA. As the project is a public facility in the TCEA, it is appropriate to provide a bike rack, which has been attached as a condition of approval. Sidewalks: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5'-10' wide sidewalk is required within the rights- of-way adjacent to the property. A 5' wide sidewalk currently exists along both NE 1st Street and North Swinton Avenue. An undulating brick paver walkway will be constructed in between the two buildings and will meander throughout the property in front of the structures and connect to the pubic sidewalk system. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS The proposed landscape plan incorporates the landscaping that exists on the site. The trees consist of a combination of Paurotis Palms, Royal Poincianas, Live Oaks, Pigeon Plum, Dahoon Holly, Hong Kong Orchid, Pigmy Date Palms, Triple Alexander, Cabbage palm, Pink Trumpet Tree, and Florida Hatch Palms interspersed throughout the property with existing Coconut Palms. Foundation plantings adjacent to the extant cottage will consist of Variegated Ginger, Coontie, Xanadu, African Iris, Foxtail Fern, Gold Dust Crotons, Firebush, and assorted annuals. Underplantings adjacent to the relocated structure will consist of Parsons Juniper, Thryallis, Wart Fern, Plumbago, Ruellia, Xanadu, Gold Dust Crotons, Ilex Shillings and Coontie. A Cocoplum hedge will be planted along the west side of the paved parking area and south side of the sod parking area, in addition to the existing hedge on the west side of the parking area. The landscaping complies with the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16. DESIGN ELEMENTS The site plan submission did not include plans for any exterior alterations or color changes for the structure. Once plans are submitted, they will be scheduled for the next available Board meeting, if the Board's review is necessary. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c)(Class III Site Plan Modification), a modification to a site plan which represents either a change in intensity of use, or which affects the spatial relationship among improvements on the land, requires partial review of Performance Standards found in LDR Sections 3.1.1 and 3.2.3, as well as required findings of LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5). LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings) HPB Staff Report Cason Cottage -Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan Page 4 Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), a finding that the proposed changes do not significantly affect the originally approved plan must be made concurrent with approval of a Class HI modification. With the previous site plan modification approval, positive findings were made with respect to Future Land Use Map and Comprehensive Plan Consistency, Concurrency and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. The development proposal involves the relocation/addition of a 1,209.3 sq.ft. commercial structure as well as the installation of associated landscaping, walkways, and parking lot modifications. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), this minor modification does not significantly impact the previous findings. However, the applicable Future Land Use Map and Concurrency items as they relate to this development proposal are discussed below. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has an OME (Other Mixed Use) Future Land Use Map designation and is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU FLUM designation. Pursuant to the LDR Sections 4.4.24(B)(2) and (5), within the OSSHAD zone district, office and museum uses are permitted. Based upon the above, a positive finding can be made with respect to consistency with the Future Land Use Map designation. Section 3.1.1 (B) - Concurrency Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements. The proposed improvements will not have an impact on water and sewer demands, nor drainage. The commercial addition will not create a need or impact on the Parks and Recreation Facilities level of service standard. Concurrency findings as they relate to Streets and Traffic, and Solid Waste are discussed below. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located within the TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD (Central Business District), OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) and the West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The traffic analysis prepared for the approval of the addition indicated that the net increase of 1,209.3 sq.ft. will generate 29 new vehicular trips per day onto the surrounding roadway network. The traffic generated will not have an adverse impact on this level of service standard. Based upon the above, a positive finding with respect to traffic concurrency can be made. Solid Waste: HPB Staff Report Cason Cottage - Class III Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan Page 5 The proposal calls for construction of a 1,209.3 sq. ft. building addition. Trash generated each year by the proposed addition will be 3.3 tons of solid waste per year [1,209.3 sq. ft. x 5.4 lbs. = 6,530 lbs/2,000 = 3.3 tons]. The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of service standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Modification Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency: The plan was reviewed but he CRA at its meeting on February 14, 2002. There were no objections to the project. Courtesy Notices: Courtesy Notices have been provided to PROD (Progressive Resident's of Delray) and the Presidents Council. Any letters of objection or support will be provided at the Board meeting. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves the relocation of the Lavender Shutters building currently located at 122 SE Sixth Avenue. Additionally, the project consists of the conversion of the contributing historic structure from retail to office use for the Delray Beach Historical Society and includes an extensive landscape plan for the entire property. The proposal will be consistent with LDR Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan provided the condition of approval is addressed. The proposal provides for the relocation and preservation of a well-maintained contributing structure. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA and the associated Class Ill site plan modification and landscape plan for the Cason Cottage Property, subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of the COA and the associated Class Ill site plan modification and landscape plan for the Cason Cottage Property, with the basis stated. HPB Staff Report Cason Cottage -Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan Page 6 STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Site Plan Modification: Approve the COA for the Class Ill site plan modification for the Cason Cottage Property, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) and (Findings) and Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following condition: 1. That a bike rack be provided. Landscape Plan: Approve the COA for the landscape plan for the Cason Cottage Property, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16. Attachments: • Site Plan • Landscape Plan Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner • HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- -MEETING DATE: March 20, 2002 AGENDA ITEM: II.B. ITEM: Fischer Properties - Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for a Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Design Elements for the proposed rehabilitation of four contributing structures for conversion to office/retail and restaurant use. . M.LK. J.R. DRIVE N.E.. 2NC— —ST. GENERAL DATA: 2 Z N Owner/Applicant Salerno Properties CITY Agent Michelle Balfort HALL < Location Northeast corner of Swinton N.E. 1ST Sr. Avenue and Southeast 1st Street. — Property Size 0.71 Acres UNITY M "' u U Future Land Use Map OMU (Other Mixed Use) z =urrent Zoning OSHAAD (Old School W OLD Square Historic Arts District) z Q SCHOOL SQUARE I 1 Adjacent Zoning North: OSHAAD (Old School ATLANTIC AVENUE Square Historic Arts District) I 1 '� .•- East: OSHAAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) R 1 South: OSHAAD (Old School Square uI -- Historic Arts District) — West: OSHAAD (Old School Square II _—< Historic Arts District) -- Existing Land Use Halfway house S.W. 15T ST.Z S.E. 1ST ST. Proposed Land Use Retail/commercial 0 Water Service Available via connection to a Q Z 10"water main within Swinton — 0 Avenue. V, N Sewer Service Available via connection to an 8" sewer main within the - S.W. 2ND ST:— S.E. 2ND ST. north/south alley of block 69. — _1 N""' 1 I v NM 1 V Mill C MIN�I 1 S.W. 3RD ST. S.E. 3RD k ST. -- -- , I --�__ NaI -- _ - IIILB. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for the Fischer Properties, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class V Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; U Design Elements; and, ❑ Demolition of noncontributing outbuildings. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of S. Swinton Avenue and SE 1st Street. BACKGROUND. The subject property consists of four, frame vernacular single family homes located on Lots 11-15, Block 69, Town of Delray, and contains 0.74 acres. The contributing historic structures, located at 27, 31, 35, and 43 S. Swinton Avenue are good examples of frame vernacular architecture. All four single family residences were constructed in 1937 and retain their historic integrity. A site plan approval request has been submitted to convert the structures residential to commercial use, which is now before the Board for action. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal includes the following: ❑ Conversion of four contributing historic residential structures into commercial/retail and restaurant (Building C) use, which includes the following: • Building A- enclosure of a 187 sq. ft. carport • Building B - enclosure of a 287 sq. ft. rear porch • Building C - enclosure of a 155 sq. ft. carport • Building D - removal of a 2' portion of the rear stairs/landing o Demolition of two non-contributing structures (one-story garage and shed); o Construction of an asphalt parking lot with 20 standard spaces and one handicapped accessible space; o Removal of existing fences that are on the property; o Installation of brick footpaths and mulch walkways with brick patio areas as well as a pond with a pedestrian bridge along the west side of the site; , HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties- Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 2 ❑ Removal of the driveways within the front yards and curb cuts on Swinton Avenue as well as installation of landscape islands on Swinton Avenue; and, o Installation of landscaping throughout the site and refuse storage areas. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the OSSHAD zone district: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 11' Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 25' 29' Side (Interior) 7.5' 6.9'* Side (Street) 15' 23.5' Rear 10' 53.5' Open Space 25% 46% * Existing non-conforming structure subject to provisions of LDR Section 1.3.4. Parking: LDR Section 4.4.24 (OSSHAD-Special District Regulation): Pursuant to LDR 4.4.24(G)(4)(a) all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. Pursuant to LDR 4.4.24(G)(4)(b), states that restaurants shall provide six spaces per one thousand square feet of total new or existing floor area being converted to restaurant use. Parking is located at the rear of the property, behind the existing structures. The applicant proposes retail, office and restaurant use for the project. Building A (1,541 sq. ft), Building B (1,142 sq. ft.), and Building D (870 sq.ft.) will contain either office or retail use and total 3,553 sq. ft. Building C will contain a total of 1,449 sq. ft, thus a total of 21 spaces are required and 21 have been provided. With this development proposal outdoor dining is not proposed. Outdoor dining is only allowed in the OSSHAD zoning district as a conditional use. In addition, the provision of HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 3 outdoor dining would require a site plan modification, at which time the parking requirement will be assessed. If outdoor dining is proposed in the future, it must be approved through the conditional use and site plan modification processes. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Stacking Requirements: Pursuant to LDR, Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), the minimum stacking distance requirement for parking lots, between 21 and 50 spaces is 20'. A stacking distance of 20' is provided at the SE 1st Street entrance. Bike Rack: Pursuant to LDR 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided at any non- residential use within the City's TCEA (Transportation Concurrency Exception Area) which, through the development review process, is determined to generate a demand. In addition, Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan requires bicycle facilities on all new development and redevelopment with particular emphasis on development within the TCEA. Provision of a bike rack is appropriate for this development and has been attached as a condition of approval. Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting is required on site for new development proposals. A photometric plan has been submitted to ensure that requirements are met as outlined in LDR Section 4.6.8. Site lighting locations have been provided on the site plan, however they have not been provided on the landscape and engineering plans, and fixture details have not been provided. Lighting locations must be indicated on the landscape and engineering plans, and fixture details provided, which is a condition of approval. Underground Utilities: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.8, utility facilities serving the development shall be located underground throughout the development. The proposed site plan indicates overhead utilities services will be provided to the relocated meter. The site plan must be revised to show the relocation of the utilities underground, and is attached as a condition of approval. Sidewalks: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5'-10' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of- way adjacent to the property. An existing 5' sidewalk currently exists along both SE 1st Street and South Swinton Avenue. An undulating brick paver and mulch walkway will be constructed throughout the property in front of the structures (west of the structures along South Swinton Avenue) and between each building leading to the parking area. The mulch paths, adjacent to Buildings B & C, will need to be replaced with pavers in order to comply with handicapped accessibility requirements, which is attached as a condition of approval. HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 4 Refuse Container Area: All refuse containers will have decorative wood fences and gates. No landscaping has been proposed to screen the refuse enclosures. RELATED ITEMS Declaration of Unity of Title: The development proposal includes improvements across property lines (Lots 11-15, Block 69). As the properties will be under one ownership and function as one development, it is appropriate to combine the properties through a Declaration of Unity of Title, which must be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. The City must be a party to any dissolution of this Unity of Title. This provision has been attached as a condition of approval. Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) Indicate the setback dimensions for each building from the closest property line. 2) Engineering and landscape plans are inconsistent with the site plan. Revise accordingly. All plans must be consistent with one another. 3) The note indicating that landscape islands will be provided by the City must be changed to developer and the islands must be extended so that they are continuous. 4) The floor plan for Building A does not correspond with the footprint on the site plan. The new stairs and landing indicated in the floor plan will encroach into the parking area. The stairs and landing should be relocated or removed to eliminate the encroachment. 5) The site pan must reflect the porch locations and roof projections; 6) The floor plan for Building D indicates that the setback of the rear porch on the north property line will correspond with the building; however, the site plan does not reflect this. Revise accordingly. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS The proposed landscape plan consists of extensive plantings on the site similar to the landscape plan at the adjacent properties including the Sundy Inn and the proposed Sundy Harvest site. The plan includes a combination of Beauty Leaf, Live Oaks, Royal Poincianas, Gumbo Limbos, Pink and Yellow Tabebuias, and Carpentaria Palms interspersed throughout the property with giant evergreen liriopes, variegated shell ginger, clerodendron quadriloculare, giant bird of paradise, viburnam awabuki, and cardboard palms underplantings and coco plum hedges along the eastern perimeter of the parking area. The proposed landscaping complies with the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16. HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 5 Refuse Container Area: The proposal includes the installation of an individual trash/refuse container area adjacent to each extant structure. The plans indicate that the dumpsters will be enclosed by a wood screen fence and gate for access. Buildings A-C (lot 12-15) will place the refuse containers on the north elevation. Building D (lot 11) will locate the enclosure on the east elevation. DEMOLITION FINDINGS Demolition (outbuildings) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), The HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing in the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. The two outbuildings slated for demolition include a shed that lies behind 31 South Swinton Avenue (Building C) and a garage that lies adjacent to 41 South Swinton Avenue (Building A). The gable shed is a one bay structure with novelty siding and an asphalt shingle roof fenestration consists of a multi-paneled door and wood awning windows. The building does appear structurally sound however, it does not appear to be contributing as it holds little architectural or historical integrity. The second outbuilding is a one bay garage located just behind and to the north of 41 South Swinton Avenue. The frame building is reflective of the style of the main residence, with its shiplap siding and wood 1/1 SHS window and is considered a contributing structure. Despite its contributing status, the gabled structure displays little architectural detail and is structurally unsound. The immediate demolition of the contributing (garage) and non-contributing (shed) structures will not be detrimental to the contributing status of the district. Both structures may be demolished without altering the historical or architectural context of the mail dwellings within the neighborhood. HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 6 DESIGN ELEMENTS Residential Conversion to Commercial: The proposal includes conversion of four contributing residential structures to office/retail and restaurant use. The frame vernacular structures are approximately 1,354 sq. ft. (proposed Building D), 855 sq. ft. (proposed Building C), 1,294 sq. ft. (proposed Building B) and 870 sq. ft for a total of 5,149 sq. ft. (proposed Building A) and are located on lots 11-15, Block 69. The structures will be rehabilitated including the installation of new fenestration if needed. Two non-contributing shed structure at the rear (east) of the properties will be demolished in order to provide room for the required parking area. 27 South Swinton Avenue (lot 11, proposed Building D) Constructed in 1937, the clapboard clad house displays a cross gable roof with shed roof porch with 6/1 SHS windows and open porch on the west elevation. A carport is located on the northwest corner with decorative brick supports. Decorative scalloped vertical siding highlights the gables and carport entrance. The original fenestration pattern will remain. The brick carport columns should remain and should not be stuccoed over to retain the historic fabric original from the structure. A copper shingle roof is proposed to replace the existing asphalt shingle roof. Design elements including the details for the windows will be brought before the Board at a later date. In addition, the copper roof should be replaced with a more suitable material in order to maintain consistency with the historic character of the neighborhood. The previous provisions have been added as conditions of approval. 31 South Swinton Avenue (lot 12, proposed Building C) The extant historic dwelling, built in 1937, consists of a clapboard exterior, gable roof with cross gable extension at the entrance and a flat deck roof addition on the back. The roof consists of asphalt shingles. While the structure contains both jalousie and awning windows, the original fenestration pattern remains. Decorative scalloped siding defines the gable and carport entrances. The proposed rehabilitation consists of the enclosure of the carport (located on the northwest side of the structure) with stucco infill at the base and side. The decorative porch posts and scalloped siding will remain. Matching clapboard siding and decorative shutters to cover the new windows are also proposed to complete the enclosure. Standing seam copper roofs are proposed to replace the existing asphalt shingles. Design elements including the details for the windows will be brought before the Board at a later date. 35 South Swinton Avenue (lot 13, proposed Building B) Constructed in 1937, the extant single family dwelling consists of a side facing gable roof with asphalt shingles. A vertical and horizontal board and batten clad addition lies on the southwestern corner of the original façade. A centered brick chimney distends from the easternmost gable. The fenestration has been altered with the addition, an apparent . HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 7 carport enclosure, that includes modern awning windows rather than the 6/6 SHS windows that are apparent on the remainder of the structure. The modern windows will be replaced with new 6/6 SHS windows to match the existing original windows. The proposed rehabilitation consists of the addition of shiplap siding to compliment the exterior of the original structure with the introduction of 6/6 SHS windows to replace the modern awning windows installed during the enclosure. The windows should be replaced in-kind with wood frames and a similar muntin profile to compliment the original windows and to distinguish the new construction from the original. A porch enclosure is proposed for additional office space. Copper shingles are proposed to replace the existing asphalt shingles. As this material was not prevalent in the area, a more suitable complimentary material for the roof should be introduced such as metal shingles or standing seam metal. This provision has been added as a condition of approval. Other design elements including the details for the windows will be brought before the Board at a later date. 43 South Swinton Avenue (lots 14 & 15, proposed Building A) The proposed rehabilitation consists of the addition of shiplap siding to compliment the exterior of the original structure with the introduction of 6/6 SHS windows to replace the modern awning windows installed during the enclosure. The windows should be replaced in-kind with wood frames and a similar muntin profile to compliment the original windows and to distinguish the new construction from the original. Copper shingles are proposed to replace the existing asphalt shingles. As this material was not prevalent in the area, a more suitable complimentary material for the roof should be introduced such as metal shingles or standing seam metal. This provision has been added as a condition of approval. Other design elements including the details for the windows will be brought before the Board at a later date. The proposed rehabilitation consists of the enclosure of the carport (located on the northwest side of the structure) with stucco infill at the base and side. The decorative porch posts and scrollwork will remain. Matching clapboard siding will complete the enclosure. Design elements including the details for the windows will be brought before the Board at a later date. Design Elements Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(8), (E)(8)(d), (E)(g) and (E)(4), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating alterations or additions of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: a) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. . HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties- Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 8 b) The relationship of solids to voids in the front façade of a building or structure will be visually compatible with the front facade of historic buildings or structures within the district. c) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: 1) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 2) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be not be impaired. The proposed rehabilitation includes the enclosure of two existing carports. To ensure that the original architectural elements and floor plans are not disturbed, the elements including turned posts and scrollwork in the carport should be incorporated into the design of the enclosure and should be readily viewed from the front facade. Historic materials should neither be damaged nor destroyed in order to utilize the carport area for interior floor space. This provision is attached as a condition of approval. In addition, a variation of roofing materials should be proposed for this site. Copper roofs (such as those found on the Sundy Inn, the Rectory, the proposed Sundy Harvest development, and several other adjacent development projects) were not prevalent in this area and should be used sparingly. As the surrounding properties already display copper roofs (standing seam or shingles) alternate materials should be sought out such as standing seam metal or wood shakes to ensure the continuity of the single family home environment. This recommendation is attached as a condition of approval. Regarding the proposed paint colors, it is recommended to vary the choice of colors between Buildings A-C to ensure that a variety of colors and schemes are used for the body and trim of the structures. This recommendation again is to ensure the continuity of the single family home environment that is prevalent along South and North Swinton. This is attached as a condition of approval. The exterior board and batten clad addition should be reconfigured to improve upon the insensitive design of the carport enclosure. Siding was placed in two directions both horizontal and vertical confusing the eye and muddling the flow of the front façade. The building's fabric should be altered to reflect just one direction of the board and batten siding or clapboards and to ensure that there remains a differentiation between the enclosure and the original structure. The replacement of the modern awning windows and the reconfiguration of the siding would compliment the existing fabric and aid in the retention of the architectural integrity of the structure. HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 9 Refuse Container Area: The proposal includes the installation of an individual trash/refuse container area adjacent to each extant structure. The plans indicate that the roll-out carts will be enclosed by a wood screen fence and gate for access. Buildings A-C (lot 12-15) will place the refuse containers on the north elevation. Building D (lot 11) will locate the enclosure on the east elevation. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Other Mixed Use (OMU) and a zoning designation of Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(B)(2), (3), and (6) within the OSSHAD zoning district, business and professional Offices, specialty shops, and restaurants are listed as permitted uses. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A), Future Land Use Map Consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan was HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 10 conducted and no applicable goals, objectives or policies were found. Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is surrounded by the OSSHAD zoning district. The property is surrounded by a combination of commercial and residential uses. Compatibility is not a concern, as the proposed use of the subject property would be allowable on each of the surrounding properties. The proposal retains the existing residential character while accommodating the adaptive re-use of the historic structures. The renovation of these structures will enhance property values within the area. Based on the above, the development will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent properties. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency: During the meeting of February 28, 2002, the proposed plan was reviewed by the CRA. The Board found that the proposed plan is consistent with the historic district. However, concerns were raised over the issue of adequate parking with the proposed restaurant use at 31 South Swinton Avenue (lot 12). This issue was broached upon notice of a Unity of Title over the four lots. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves the demolition of the two outbuildings and the rehabilitation and conversion of four contributing single family homes (lots 11-15, Block 69) to commercial/retail use and restaurant including the integration of extensive landscaping. The proposal will be consistent with LDR Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan only with substantial changes as identified in this staff report. These changes are outlined as conditions of approval. The proposed elevations for the four buildings to be converted comply with LDR Section 4.5.1 and 4.6.18, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines based upon the conditions as stated below. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for the Fischer Properties based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4) and (E)(8), (E)(8)(d), (E)(g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines subject to conditions. HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 11 C. Deny the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Fischer Properties, based upon failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4) and (E)(8), (E)(8)(d), (E)(g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Demolition Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1) approve the demolition of the two outbuildings located on Lots12 and 14 of the subject property. Site Plan Modification: Approve the COA for the Class V site plan for the Fischer Properties, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) and (Findings) and Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That a Declaration of Unity of Title must be recorded for lots 11-15, Block 69, town of Delray prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) That a bike rack be placed on site. 4) That decorative site lighting fixture details are provided and that the light locations be indicated on the site and landscape plans. 5) That the site plan must be revised to show the relocation of the utilities underground. 6) The mulch paths, adjacent to Buildings B & C, will need to be replaced with pavers in order to comply with handicapped accessibility requirements. 7) That a revised traffic statement be submitted that accurately calculates the vehicular trips generated from the conversions from residential to commercial/restaurant. Landscape Plan: Approve the COA for the landscape plan for the Fischer Properties, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following condition: 1) That all proposed landscaping that will interfere with the line of site of the front façade from the right-of-way be replaced or relocated. . HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties- Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 12 Design Elements: Approve the COA for the design elements for the Fischer Properties, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1 and 4.6.18, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the design elements for the rehabilitation of the extant historic structures be developed in line with the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 2) The architectural details associated with the current carports must be incorporated into the new elevation changes to ensure the retention of the original architectural configuration. 3) Seek alternate materials for the roof of each structure. Alternate proposals for the roofing materials must be brought back to the Board for review and approval. 4) That the color palette for all exterior paint for proposed Buildings A-C be variegated with the introduction of additional color schemes for the body and trim for the historic structures. The proposed color palette is subject to further review and approval by the Board prior to its application. 5) The exterior board and batten clad addition on Building B should be reconfigured to present a more compatible design with the two types of siding to ensure that there remains a differentiation between the enclosure and the original structure. Attachments: • Site Plan • Landscape Plan • Elevations Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner . HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 13 APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists via service lateral connections to the 10" water main within N. Swinton Avenue. ❑ Sewer service exists via service lateral connections to an 8" sewer main in the north/south alley and along the west side of the abutting property to the east. ❑ Adequate fire suppression will be provided via installation of a fire hydrant on the east side of Swinton Avenue, approximately 120' north of SE 1st Street. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build- out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standards. Drainage: A preliminary drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on- site via an exfiltration system. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD, and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Therefore, a traffic study is not required for concurrency purposes; however a traffic statement is necessary to keep a record of trips approved in the TCEA and for calculation of traffic impact fees. The applicant has submitted a statement based upon the conversion from office to retail and restaurant. The statement must be revised to accurately calculate the vehicular trips generated from the conversions from residential to commercial/restaurant, which has been attached as a condition of approval. Parks and Open Space: Park dedication requirements do not apply for nonresidential uses. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for a conversion of a single family dwelling to a retail/office and restaurant. Trash generation is based upon the worst case scenario of retail and restaurant. Trash generated each year by the proposed 3,553 sq.ft. retail space is 18 tons [3,553 sq.ft. x 10.2 lbs/sq.ft. = 36,240.6 lbs/2,000 = 18 tons] and the 1,449 sq.ft. restaurant will generate 18 tons 1,449 sq.ft. X 24.9 lbs./sq.ft. = 36,080 Ibs/2,000 = 18 tons] for a total of 36 tons of solid waste per year. The trash generated by the four single family home is 8 tons [1.99 tons X 4] of solid waste per year resulting HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 14 in an increase of 28 tons per year. The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of service standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. HPB Staff Report Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 15 APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent Will be met once a bike rack is provided C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent HPB Staff Report ` Fischer Properties-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements ` Page 16 F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location,without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent _0 Planning & Zoning Department ,� �4. MEMORANDUM qy TO: Historic Preservation Board FROM: Wendy Shay Historic Preservation Planner DATE: March 18, 2002 RE: Fischer Properties, Paint schemes The following color schemes are proposed for the Fischer Properties project: Building A: Green body with blue and pink trim Building B: Blue body with green trim Building C: Pink body with blue and beige/cream trim Building D: Beige/cream body with rust trim Color samples of the paint schemes will be presented at the HPB meeting on March 20, 2002. p. I I I I I I I I I I U I I I I u u l_I lilt ! !I I I I I J _MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. 2ND ST. w• ' 11111 > a a IQ > a o o Q. Z ENCV— CITY L� . Z HALL a w r J V.W. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. I . 1 I-N 3 1- w COMMUNITY w >Li oce •' Z CENTER n Z `� w Z • TENNIS > OLD L. STADIUM ZI I I SCHOOL a w -� l JQ SQUARE I I z T . ATLANTIC AVENUE SOUTH I 1 I I POLICE COUNTY wiiiiii 1 / • COMPLEX COURT HOUSE i a a S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. Z LLI 0 > 0 w N a > - I— a w 0 > CV w 0' H U) n F- F- V) 0 (n ec S.W. 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND ST. w N viill I--/ w w - vi vi VI vi N ______, f 1 r • • --igmr- FISCHER PROPERTIES CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL PLANNING do ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM597 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Agent: Camilucci Signs Project Name: Forman Office Building Project Location: 334 NE 1st Avenue ITEM BEFORE : THE BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a hanging sign for the Forman Office Building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKG;ROU.ND ' The subject property is Lot 20, Subdivision of Block 65, Town of Delray (0.14 acres). The property consists of a restored contributing single-family residence constructed in 1907 in the vernacular style. In the 1920's a garage was built on the rear of the lot adjacent to the alley. The garage was demolished in the 1950's and a new garage was constructed in 1994. During the meeting of December 5, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and architectural elevations to convert the single family home to a law office. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes the installation of a hanging sign in order to identify the commercial site. The proposed sign is a single-faced, oval-shaped carved foam sign with eye hook attachments designed to appear as weathered wood. A 1 1/2" foam core is used to construct the convex shaped sign. The sign will display a blue background (Matthews Wild Blue) to contrast the pale yellow border and lettering (Queen Anne's Lace Yellow) intended to match the exterior of the building. Gold leafing will highlight the outline of the establishment's name and house number displayed below. The hanging style sign measures 36" in height and 36" in length for a total of 9 sq. ft. and will be mounted from the eave of the shed roof porch between the porch posts to the left of the main entrance with metal hooks. ANALYSIS The Board shall consider: SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES Forman Office Building COA 02-162 March 20, 2000 Page 2 LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(1)(d) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Under Canopy Signs" A sign hung from a canopy or roof of a walkway. It may be rigid or may swing. Such a sign may not have more than two sign faces. LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and states: The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7). LDR Section 4.6.7 (H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. a) Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (G) with respect to height and area. b) Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. c) Conflict_ The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building facade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the Forman Office Building COA 02-162 March 20, 2000 Page 3 views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the architecture. A list of suggestions then follows, the two operatives in this instance are: • Sign style should reflect the appropriate architectural periods. • Sign dimensions should be in proportion to the building's size. • Appropriately designed lighted signs enhance a district. However, the exterior source of the lighting should be concealed. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts, however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining" and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. One such standard states: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Conclusion The proposed signage conveys the identity of the establishment and is consistent with the architectural style of the vernacular structure without obscuring important character defining architectural elements. The design is appropriate in relation to its proportion to the building and the signage in the neighborhood. Positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7, the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards can be made. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA for the installation of a sign for the Forman Building, subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA for the installation of a sign for the Forman Office Building, with the basis stated. Forman Office Building COA 02-162 March 20, 2000 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION , Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign for the Forman Office Building, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7. (G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b) and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. Attachments: • Sign Specs HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Agent: Roger Cope, AIA Project Name: Pat Lynch Residence Project Location: 226 South Ocean Boulevard ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for the Patrick Lynch Residence, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Nassau Street and S. Ocean Boulevard within the Nassau Park Historic District. The property encompasses the south 21.65' of Lot 1, all of Lot 2 and the east 35' of Lot 3, Nassau Park subdivision and consists of 0.41 acres. The main house, located on the south side of the property, was constructed in 1936. The construction date of the guest cottage is unknown, however City records indicate that it was constructed prior to 1949. Both structures were built in the Resort Cottage style of the 1930's and are contributing from a historical perspective. The house was a winter residence for Mr. and Mrs. John G. Cherry of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and was one of the first houses in the Nassau Park subdivision. On November 7, 2000, the Historic Preservation Board approved a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class II site plan modification for the Construction of a 2nd floor addition on the guest house (north building) and conversion of the structure from an illegally converted duplex to a single family dwelling; construction of a one story addition on the main house (south building); construction of a pool and deck on the east side of the property; construction of a 4'-3' high masonry wall on the south and east sides of the property; and, installation of associated landscaping. Variances to reduce the front and side setbacks pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) were also approved. During the meeting of June 20, 2001, the Board approved COA 428A, for the addition of decorative shutters to the windows. The Board approved the shutters noting several locations where the dimensions of the shutters needed modification, and requiring that hardware associated with the shutters be added. On August 1, 2001, the HPB approved minor elevation changes and a pre-construction application for an ad valorum tax exemption. The associated improvements are currently under construction. 226 S. Ocean Blvd., 2002-158-COA-HPB Nassau Park Historic District Page 2 During the Board meeting on January 16, 2002, the Board reviewed and approved the construction of a cricketed gable entrance with four support posts separate from the structure on the front façade of the rear cottage. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal involves the construction of a gable entrance on the west elevation of the contributing residence (south building) facing the gravel parking lot. The front façade and main entrance of the dwelling faces south towards Nassau Street. Displaying minimal architectural features, the west entrance currently has no door hood or overhang causing constant exposure to the elements. The proposed gable design would mimic the current gable roof on the front facade of the structure and the gable addition at the rear. The elevation change, perpendicular to Nassau Street, would be visible from the right-of-way. In addition, the applicant proposes the construction of concrete paver walkways and a pool deck, as well as the conversion of the 5 space pea rock parking area to paver brick. Lastly, the proposal includes the replacement of the previously approved 4' high wood fence along the north property line with a 6' high concrete block and stucco wall, and the replacement of the 4' high picket fence that surrounds the pool with a matching 4' high concrete block wall that will be painted to match the main structure. ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4), 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(h) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (a) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (b) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. (c) The roof shape of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of a historic site, building, or structure within in a historic district. 226 S. Ocean Blvd., 2002-158-COA-HPB Nassau Park Historic District Page 3 The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation offers the following guidelines for consideration of an addition to a historic structure: (a) The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize the property shall be avoided. (b) Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. (c) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (d) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Gable Entrance Upon review of the project, the proposed improvement of a gable entrance on the west elevation does not appear to be an intrusive or inappropriate addition to the extant historic structure. The gable does mimic the two gables on the front of the structure in addition to the gable entrance added to the rear of the main dwelling. The gable entrance addition can be constructed and could easily be removed without any damage to the extant historic fabric and is therefore not an insensitive addition. Consequently, positive findings can be made with respect to the requested proposal for the gable entrance on the west elevation. Concrete Paver Walkways and Parking Lot The proposed concrete pavers will be a welcome addition to the parking area that currently is pea gravel. Additionally, concrete paver walkways along the northern perimeter of the main dwelling and surrounding the pool will compliment the proposed pavers in the parking area. Positive findings can therefore be supported with respect to the addition of concrete pavers in the parking, walkway, and pool areas. Perimeter Fence With the site plan approval in 2001, the Board approved removal of a 2' high wall and the installation of a c.b.s. wall of varying height from 3' to 4'-6" adjacent to Ocean 226 S. Ocean Blvd., 2002-158-COA-HPB Nassau Park Historic District Page 4 Boulevard and Nassau Street. The applicant wishes to replace the approved 4' wood fence along the north property line with a similar concrete block wall 6' in height. The wall will be consistent with the wall associated with the historic structure. The transition of the wall height from 4'-6" to 6' at the northeast corner will be addressed by the provision of a decorative element consistent with those that exist on site. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to the proposed wall. A 4' concrete block wall intended to match the perimeter wall is also proposed around the pool at the rear of the historic main dwelling to replace the wood picket fence. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for the Patrick Lynch Residence based upon positive findings with respect to the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, pursuant to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), and 4.5.1(E)(8)(h). C. Deny the COA and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for the Patrick Lynch Residence, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), and 4.5.1(E)(8)(h), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class I Site Plan Modification for the Patrick Lynch Residence, based upon positive findings with respect to the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, pursuant to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), and 4.5.1(E)(8)(h). Attachments: • Site Plan • Proposed Elevations • Rear gabled entrance of adjacent structure • Photos inm., W r '..-. ''A am rt -...-, if 4.•. t a ? } ?3 6 • p �° J F' t ,• • 1 r' J t Lsr• . y rq„" 1 x— Setbacks between 226 and 220 S. Ocean Blvd. (facing west) '� `7rtf�A1,E I �,�� ; a�� i,i,-.-_;4,11/,,,,,,,,:,I .1,-,./.4.,1 ,,i•, :,,,..- ,,,,.,.i,,;i.,i,,,... .:,., 0i ,tip ' :1' ' 1 'It .. . "--e. ,._ -- ..i, 4„.4,_.4.4'tem'a.'',',4,..*.,',.44..S...*, •,... .71,2%-e..,:,014... ,p •, s. r 'tfr i�a`.. .; ,r /. .�T w tat 7���i yarn • t ' V Property at 220 S. Ocean Blvd. and the landscaping buffer(north elevation) w fil .r' ii a Ilirmi 11 I 11 III _ I u n - ., I -_ • � `. .>s�ar;.ar�r .... ^ter .-�+ West elevation of historic main residence Now 1l - ram- n Itl iii !I! 1 .• III - --;T Existing pea gravel drive b_' a d d-:y 4. • s' '7 I -,` ' f - f: Y 4 ft# ✓,, p0, •. - 1 • Perimeter wall along the property to the south of the Lynch residence. III K. !II_: ZI► `ee. -7'7 - I1II111 Ill 11 IIII 1111 III_ 4 i 40 mar. t-- . : a^g ; ,fir, Front facades (east elevation) of 226 and 220 S. Ocean Blvd. HISTORIC PRESERVATION MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Project Name: 17 NW 4th Avenue Project Location: East side of NW 4th Avenue, approximately 350' north of West Atlantic Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the non-contributing structure at 17 NW 4th Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/'PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the east side of NW 4th Avenue, approximately 350' north of West Atlantic Avenue, in the West Settler's Historic District. The property consists of Lots 26 and 27, Block 36, and contains a 1,122 square foot non-contributing duplex constructed in 1961. The Delray Beach Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) is requesting to demolish this structure as a part of site preparation involved in the development of the previously approved Atlantic Grove project. The Atlantic Grove project involves the construction of a mixed-use development consisting of 55 townhouses, 20 condominium units and 47,856 square feet of retail/office/restaurant space, that will be located on the north side of West Atlantic Avenue between NW 3rd and 5th Avenues. ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1(F) "Restrictions on Demolitions" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness' for demolition. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill criteria for designation for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. Meeting Date:March 20,2002 Agenda Item:II.E. 17 NW 4th Avenue, Demolition West Settlers Historic District Page 2 (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. The non-contributing structure is constructed of concrete block and displays a front facing gable roof with asphalt shingles. Fenestration consists of aluminum awning windows and jalousie doors. The structure displays no architectural detail and holds no historical context in relation to the historic district. The demolition of the non-contributing structure will not be deleterious to the historic character of the district. As architectural and historical integrity of the structure are not present, a positive finding can be made with regard to the demolition request. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the demolition of the non-contributing duplex at 17 NW 4th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F). C. Deny approval of the demolition of the non-contributing duplex at 17 NW 4th Avenue, with the basis stated. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness request for the demolition of a non- contributing duplex located at 17 NW 4th Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. Attachments: Photos Report Prepared by: Debra Garcia,Assistant City Planner .4 -+ .' .. - .. .►.r• ..�{ - . .. a.. fit .� � t s A ,' • Y> p 4. malty $ --`tip ,✓ xr2 a r-.� 3 3'C 4 M t' - , �,'4,41.::i+.:1::':,.._,I. ' f w a .• • ✓ vy ar ` lf -ss". ' rl Se .... F a 4 c. ''Y r s .;cF , . ♦ _ . t r:' a srt `$�.� r r` ' • "-ik �1^i.�Z", 'y;z:s a :r -'. �'i - r, 3Y,+ ' . �7h 7'"'l' �,rt,,•ti` t'r r •v �_t � ^.3 • v '�,'f- a,.-Wt`c '�S •'�• •4f'�� �' �4.. � '�- s w ,,� r.*d; .{.. `'"-' a. -3w� `ti'' Y..�.'•Y-'a. -: 4. • - '� -t t,P> t w.. ..- 7,.t--- �ry s���s -x tt;°+.^, 2. + "'k,f' N'0,r' ••z'r� a" ,';- »ti ,vx 7,kr..7 ` aa. 'd. +f� r a <.a�::..8►.•-i ' d-vx` 4'� �_ s,F Asa-f M3 - .-•• +r,. �Yr r T vY;r ie �, 'ws -r ,F c •T yr'S -' 'k ..t tY y,..i t r ri ll ..- ..:i w S`a. r s tr r- ti,. b.-',%:7 ,L'+ 3,''A ti Z^s' tT2441 4��`t`Tc''-+.J`u ti'1AVA. s-kJe ;.:�Y t..�4 > .y'� F.; .. -4 - ,--- " t hk,r r' ya. G 4-,,,, :1-- - 4'-tx_...r'ti v«tom-' t`r.�t�i,, •.-' may,.�,,f .t+_,"`,14 '{. ..:A t,, x:5 a ''3+� A,a- t ._ 4 r t Y.•'� a. ; .F 4'i•.'� 3ry .. yr, . 'g-- in.'s,. tom^ "� a�.a{• iy" `,,, 3 5 :=a ss ,F'-S-xt , ;.3 'Tr � -ttri ~i r2a\ krs 1.,-? x� lsz 4 F tiz ef,,,.".f-.A t '., := f,: Y Y S '1• +✓ i...- .-r- ^'S• �� .1 4'Vt T S `Je3'i-- S .5 ' t '•���` cr-.`1.. �'r j 4{'�^ir 5 w i•^,.,-3• f x a�•'., u,x-✓.--, - ��"- _ ". V !'. -•;"S e �i' t .r.; 'Y t'S-` rd'F r' �-'� .kw 4f,• ''�» ti'`c • :- rl• i� .ram Y i Y` S Ka. r r 3--C J . ',""°ste r .i—'4,+�' :i-' i,.. 5 i • J r ,, •r+- -+' ,,z^ 5 y -.-.rsE.i.y', ,,i '�'a r 4,x yr c5,-,.3•-.,7r .- � . k. > rih„f� -Y _k ?- S '.� Nvn` -.Y r' '3.,�' ,7 Y ✓ - •k -- iy; 'a .t3..a .nat "' � ', ..- rs - S s.. rr r. , A-z- ,p s-- ' ti 1 YY,,, _ -t sr ",.�' --s- ._'r;T3'•„�.f"` S.t4 • `,.. -' r'� rf' m t- �,�.� x y.,h '`� k',,r x-�- -. - .-`fi ��'--�.:�.s�id -:�-L,• � r bit" - :w.+.r�:2-<t...,-z'M+��-,- 4_y ♦ - ~ ELF r�" ti y • b tY 9 ^ -- • r 1sL;wit t .s, 4. lb c.. . t#'u•a ..asr}.Y••¢"-a1,_ n�,7 P" -• -ir,j'.y-.w'� J s Iy 4''it.: ` " a C "''.+ z-.L} �'-. ? s,,nc n:•• •fir s • F 'st .. �a_c,..,..�.+y+ sir v,+ l „� y x .. i �t ♦+'iat,�r+R�'$�'E'ti'i'°- _ 'Ms -_ 1._ ' 4,1 q y-; '�_iRF • to! •,. ;_: - . _x. 1 �-".a„ • ryr a.. l •t -t. 4^- c c•, • ..s .reN. :41-• '.�,'. � a f-! h ter p - ' } � s.'mv`•`,C, � -_ + mod. .ty � ,^ 4}' V. 'Crt4..s .F' k�.td°7 l- _F J ; {. } _ e'+r.,:♦_1"rAK L- ffp �°RC�I .¢yam� Y � W.Y`a - t 'i- - a.�S fi.'- t� ,},•, i ' - '' 1 Dt T .i- .. F-.x'a,"`•r � e" ..r a ` »,- �' sw .� rr 4a'i�,"a�! -- 3. - `Y -; • it f'5;;il .tsy rc' ,-i, 2`tr- t h Y'cfM1YF r^•� _t {'. •s a' .P ,.u ' .i , ' s -yr` °'' .fit - g?. 1 r i � ,- „a. i ' t t-a�r-sh `,m•{ ".. .."''"'4' r`F'b+yr1. • r t �°�-+�"a_v" �s `'o h- t. � ; - >si_- • ��_ '�` •F "' �_.yc,x • ram_-�• .7�at • ' ---- •'• . k Y� - L� y"'�' • ...• ;r-SY :nLc Sf �1 f� �'.�F" �'Y '4 '..-r`lP'tw- -0L cam_ ,- > - : a n r ,�, f .. #y,'. .......,�,., - 7Yr v a '--, :-: , -33 'g.F,�`�. *,..,. .' { • -•--...a - _ i+ "^�V..*- • 4 -Cam.fi �yq'�se :N '7 -_.t t x� d k:;i w, r ... ,rG,if ,yt 6 t,vta. }f,F-a ..y -. .Yr ^Y' Y 1 ': k` - '•a +� 1am --k - ^"' L - 3� ,y} t 'yr^r - } r i 7.h" h -• . R `i . x ". f S' t , „� �'a!• 3x � reµ k ;�s,p _X, . T•?&!! +k" 'kr .,,�" ... .. _ HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Agent: Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources Project Name: Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation Project Location: 20 North Swinton Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing sign for the Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property is located on the west side of North Swinton Avenue, approximately 140' north of West Atlantic Avenue and consists of Lot 12, Block 60, Town of Delray. The property is located within the Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD) zoning district. The property contains a two-story Monterey style building approximately 2,300 square feet in size. The structure was originally built as a single-family residence in the late 1930's, and was relocated to the site from the Hillcrest neighborhood in West Palm Beach in 1994. The building is presently occupied by the Delray Beach Historical Society. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS The applicant proposes the installation of a new free-standing sign to replace an existing free-standing sign, which is in disrepair. The proposed free-standing sign is comprised of two parts, both of which are double-sided with rounded-notched corners. In addition to the above items, the main portion (upper) of the sign will consist of a raised half-ellipse for the building number. The secondary portion (lower) of the sign will be attached to the main portion via eye hooks. The sign will display a yellow background matching the existing building that will — contrast the green border and lettering, which is intended to match the shutters. The free-standing sign measures 55" in height and 40" in length for a total of approximately 15 square feet and will be mounted with aluminum brackets between a pair of 4" x 4" posts connected with a horizontal beam. Decorative spheres will be placed on top of each of the posts. Meeting Date: March 20, 2002 Agenda Item: II. F. Historic Preservations Board Staff Report Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation Page 2 SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES: The Board shall consider the following: Sign Regulations: LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(1)(b), addresses Sign Design Standards for "Free-Standing Signs" and states: A free-standing sign is not affixed to any other structure. It may be either a pole sign or a monument sign. Neither the pole nor the base of the monument shall be considered in calculation of the area of the sign face. A free-standing sign may not have more than two sign faces. LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(2)(b), addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and states: The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7). LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(a), addresses "Basic Setback Determinants" and states: The setback for a free standing sign shall be ten feet (10) from the ultimate right- of-way line unless there is a special setback or special landscape area designated for the street pursuant to Section 4.3.4(H)(6). The setback is measured from the closest portion of the sign to the right-of-way. No signs shall extend into a right-of-way. LDR Section 4.6.7(H)(2)(a)-(c), addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" and states: The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (1), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. (a) Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (E) with respect to height and area. Historic Preservations Board Staff Report Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation Page 3 (b) Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. (c) Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Design Guidelines: The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building façade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the architecture. A list of suggestions then follows, the two operatives in this instance are: • Sign style should reflect the appropriate architectural periods. • Sign dimensions should be in proportion to the building's size. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation: No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts; however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining" and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. One such standard states: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Conclusion: The proposed free-standing signage conveys the identity of the establishment and is compatible with the architectural style of the existing building without obscuring any Historic Preservations Board Staff Report Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation Page 4 important character defining architectural elements. The design is appropriate with respect to being in proportion with the building and other signage in the neighborhood. Positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7 (Sign Regulations), the City's Historic Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards can be made. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA for the installation of a free-standing sign for the Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation. C. Deny the COA for the installation of a free-standing sign for the Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation, with the basis stated. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing sign for the Judge Knott Center for Historic Preservation, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.6.7(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b), and (H)(2)(a-c), of the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. Attachments: • Sign Specifications Staff Report Prepared by: Robert G.Tefft, Planner got( .1V (--). r,C) • / Y biF Di6--iik)Thiiii-‘ _...- i - ,`` (� G .. �, G . ,. r� i= lL�f S "i" .‹...,4) 20 ,. , , ---,- * , (s _ �rl JUDGE KNOTT CENTER 1 IL .36iJ `-�'1 FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION r 1Z- iA� lt��� _ '-mow 3 PALM REACH COUNTY f`3ii R t = K(flii0 RLUIONAL 01 HICI DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES • J f 0(c.- ?Pr I w FLORIDA DEPARTMENT UN STATE , e l 'stNtS'l+ --.. Ut S 1► _ AC YencC-- L.-�L -k _ d6S E Q tc, `t DE.LRAY BEACH ' cW t-� , K ��- r'TTSTORIC AI., SOC''''..7i7Y 1 • i. 14, *LW l � s 10 C:III/T} HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Agent: Michael Strauss Project Name: 30 SE 1st Avenue Project Location: Between SE 1st Street and Atlantic Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of existing windows, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Background On November 20, 1996, the Historic Preservation Board approved the removal of the existing jalousie windows and the installation of white aluminum single hung sash windows with a 6/1 lite configuration in conjunction with the site plan to convert the 1925 Mission style residence to an office. This approval was valid for 18 months, however, the replacement of the windows and associated improvements was never completed and the approval expired. At the meeting of February 20, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed the COA request to replace the existing jalousie and awning windows with new 6/1 and 4/1 DHS windows. Upon review of the request, the Board considered the applicant's proposal to replace the existing windows with aluminum frame windows. The applicant requested consideration of the aluminum due to the fact that replacement in—kind with wood framed windows would be cost prohibitive. Previous deliberation by the Board regarding this matter included the review of aluminum windows with impact glass along Banker's Row. On February 2, 2000, the Board approved the use of aluminum windows on those elevations that are not along the front façade on a case by case basis. However, any windows or doors replaced within view of the right-of-way must be done in-kind with wood frames and similar muntin profiles. Design Elements Analysis LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. Meeting Date: March 20, 2002 Agenda Item: II.G. HPB Staff Report 30 SE 1st Avenue—Reconsideration of windows Page 2 The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. All improvements to building, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. The applicant will provide information to the Board at its meeting regarding the cost and details of the windows. Further research by Staff has found several alternatives to the proposed aluminum windows. The alternatives include 6/1 and 4/1 DHS solid wood windows by leading window companies including Pella and Anderson and wood core windows with vinyl coverings. These alternatives appear more economically feasible and will support the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation to replace all historic materials in-kind. Additional information will be available at the meeting. Conclusion An alternative material to the aluminum framed windows proposed may be a more cost effective solution while achieving the original intent of the Board to replace all historic materials in-kind. One such alternative is to install aluminum windows on all elevations not visible from the right- of-way with wood windows on the front façade only. Another alternative would be to install wood core windows with vinyl cladding on the exterior. Further review of the applicant's request and alternatives from Staff could determine a reasonable solution to replacing the windows and retaining the historic integrity of the structure while keeping the project economically feasible. The final project must be consistent with LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), the City Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA for the installation of wood core windows with vinyl cladding for the property at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to Section LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. HPB Staff Report 30 SE 1st Avenue—Reconsideration of windows Page 3 C. Approve the COA for the installation of wood windows on the front façade only and aluminum frame windows along the remainder of the elevations not visible from the right-of- way for the property at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to Section LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. D. Deny the COA for 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Board's discretion. Attachments: Elevations, Site Plan