HPB-04-05-00 April
DELRAY BEACH
kattzt
All-AmericaCtty
11 1I
AGENDA
1993
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
Meeting Date: April 5, 2000
Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting
Location: First Floor Conference Room
Time: 6:00 P.M.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any
matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for
this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such
record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide
or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• March 1, 2000
III. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
A. Variance 66 and Associated COA-409: Bodil Marc Residence 218 NE 5th
Court, Contributing Single Family Residence, Del-Ida Park Historic
District. Bodil or Josef Marc, Owners.
Consider Granting a Variance to the Land Development Regulations
Section 4.3.4(K) Pertaining to the Side Interior Building Setback
Requirements, and to Section 4.6.14(A)(1) Pertaining to the Visibility
Triangle from the Driveway Access to the Right-Of-Way.
IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS
A. COA-410: 235 NE 1st Avenue, Bankers Row, Contributing Single Family
Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Patricia Kaufman, Owner.
Consider a Room/Studio Addition to the Rear of the Residence.
HPB Meeting
April 5, 2000
Page 2
B. COA-339 Continuation: 1104 Nassau Street, Contributing Single Family
Residence, Nassau Park Historic District. Liz Bold, Owner.
Consider a Change of Roofing Material from Wood Shakes to
Architectural Dimensional Composition Shingle.
C. Pre-Application: 34 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic
District. Eric Carlstrom, Owner.
Review and Comment on a Proposal to Demolish a Contributing Single
Family Residence and Construct a 3 Story Office Building of
Approximately 7,080 Square Feet.
V. DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS ITEMS
A. Make a Recommendation to the City Commission Regarding the Possible
Acquisition of Lots 19, 23 and 24 of Block 69, Old School Square Historic
District for Parking. Presented by Diane Dominguez, Planning & Zoning
Director.
B. Make a Recommendation to the City Commission with Respect to the
Approval of an Amendment to the Land Development Regulations which
Pertains to Property Owner Notification and HPB's Authority to Grant
Waivers Associated with Nonconforming Lots of Record.
C. Abandonment of the East/West and North/South Alleys in Block 36, West
Settlers Historic District.
D. Consider the use of Hardiboard or Comparable Material as an Alternative
to Wood Siding for Use on Historic Structures.
Add. D r- `T Pak , va- 0 5stIAID -&mk ° ax .
VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Reports from Historic District Representatives
B. Board Members
C. Staff
VII. ADJOURN
Pat Cayce
Historic Preservation Planner
POSTED ON: March 30, 2000
FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT
LAST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR
COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
Ames, Shane
MAILING ADDRESS [X]CITY []COUNTY []OTHER LOCAL AGENCY []STATE
302 Dixie Blvd, Delray Beach, FL 33444
CITY COUNTY
Delray Beach Palm Beach
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY
April 5, 2000
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, City of Delray Beach
OR COMMITTEE
Historic Preservation Board
WHO MUST FILE FORM 4
This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee,
whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of
interest.
As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers,this form is divided
into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is
prescribed for all other boards, i.e.those at the state level.
'ART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed.
PART A
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
[Required by Section 112.1343(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).]
The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM
VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from
knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government
agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes)by whom he is retained.
In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict:
(a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is
abstaining from voting;and
(b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below.
NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section
163.357, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not
prohibited from voting. In such cases, however,the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made.
I,the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on April 5, 2000:
(a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one):
inured to my special private gain;or
X inured to the special gain of Eric Caristrom, by whom I am retained.
(b) The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
Pre-Application for 34 N. Swinton Avenue, proposal to de ish a contributing single
family residence& construct a 3-story office building. Arch' at for the owner.
April 5, 2000 /7
Date Filed Si urZ
2
Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form.
PART B
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS
[Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).]
Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official
capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom is retained is required
to disclose the nature of is interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs.
I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclosure that on , 19 :
(a) I voted on a matter which (check one):
inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retain(
(b) The measure on which I voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
Date Filed Signature
Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form.
PART C
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person
responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. this form need
not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict.
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 11.317(1983), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY DISCLOSURE CONSTITUT
GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE ORE MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL It
SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALI
NOT TO EXCEED $5,000.
MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PUBLIC HEARING
MEETING DATE: APRIL 5, 2000
LOCATION: CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS
I. ROLL CALL:
The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it
was determined that a quorum was present.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Hurlburt, Tony Keller, Shane Ames,
Dave Bodker (arrived 6:10), Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-
Lee McDermott
MEMBERS ABSENT: John Johnson
STAFF PRESENT: Pat Cayce, Diane Dominguez, Michelle Hoyland
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of March 21, 2000 were before the Board
for consideration. Mr. Ames moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The
motion was seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0.
III. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
A. Variance 66 & COA 409: Bodil Marc Residence, 218 NE 5th Court,
Contributing Single Family Residence, Del Ida Park Historic District. Bodil
& Josef Marc, Owners.
Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of
considering granting a variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) pertaining to the
side interior building setback requirements and to Section 4.6.14(A)(1)
pertaining to the visibility triangle from the driveway access to the right-of-
way.
Mrs. Cayce informed the Board that due to submittal problems this item is
being postponed.
IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS:
A. COA 410: 235 NE 1st Avenue, Bankers Row, Contributing Single Family
Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Patricia Kaufman, Owner.
Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of
considering a 380 square foot room/studio addition to the rear of the
residence.
It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5-0 to
approve COA 410 as presented based upon positive findings with respect
to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) "Development Standards".
At this point on the agenda Mr. Bodker arrived at the meeting.
B. COA 339-Continuation: 1104 Nassau Street, Contributing Single Family
Residence, Nassau Park Historic District. Liz Bold, Owner.
Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of
considering a change in roofing material from wood shake to architectural
dimensional composition shingles.
The Board considered the fact that the shake roof is not original to the
structure and that the life span of wood shakes in such close proximity to
the ocean is less than would be expected elsewhere in the City.
It was moved by Mr. Bodker, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0
to approve COA 339-Continuation based upon positive findings with
respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) to allow Harbor Blue Owens Corning
Oakridge Architectural composition shingles to be installed.
At this point on the agenda Mr. Ames stepped down from the Board.
C. Pre-Application: 34 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic
District. Eric Carlstrom, Owner.
Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of
review and comment on a proposal to demolish a contributing single
family residence and construct a 3 story office building of approximately
7,080 square feet.
The applicant presented photos of the adjacent buildings on N. Swinton
Avenue and a sketch of the proposed building to show the Board the
height in relation to neighboring buildings. When the discussion regarding
all parking being located off site began Chris Brown of the CRA explained
that the parking lots to the rear of the subject property were created to
provide centralized parking for developing business properties, either
conversions or new construction. Mr. Brown stated that there are
sufficient spaces remaining on the lot for the owner of the new building to
purchase all 26 of the required spaces.
-2- HPB Minutes 04/05/00
The consensus of the Board was that locating the parking off-site was not
as great a problem as is the loss of the historic structure if the new
construction occurs. The Board liked the design of the structure, however
they had concerns about the height. It was suggested that the new
building be lengthened to accommodate the number of square feet the
owner wants to build, but the Board felt that was inappropriate, as the
building would be too massive in length. While the Board generally liked
the design of the proposed building, they asked the architect to consider
some modification, which would appear to reduce its size and height.
At this point on the agenda Mr. Ames returned to the Board.
V. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS:
A. Making a Recommendation to the City Commission Regarding the
Possible Acquisition of Lots 19, 23 & 24 of Block 69, Old School Square
Historic District, for Parking. Presented by Diane Dominguez, Director of
Planning & Zoning.
It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Ames and passed 6-0 to
recommend that the City Commission acquire Lots 19, 23 and 24, within
Block 69. The Board felt that with the additional lots available, it might be
possible to reduce the height of the garage proposed for Lots 20, 21 and
22.
B. Making a Recommendation to the City Commission Regarding the
Approval of an Amendment to the Land Development Regulations which
Pertains to Property Owner Notification and HPB's Authority to Grant
Waivers Associated with Nonconforming Lots of Record.
It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0
to recommend to the City Commission that LDR Section 4.1.4(C) (Use of
Lots of Record), Section 4.3.1(D) (Application of District Regulations) and
Section 5.1.6(A) (Compliance with Zoning Regulations) be amended to
establish notification procedures for granting relief from the minimum lot
dimension requirements and providing that the Historic Preservation
Board may grant waivers to the requirement to allow the development of a
nonconforming lot of record which is under the same ownership as the
adjacent lot, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section
2.4.5(M)(5), that the text amendment is consistent with and furthers the
Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
C. Abandonment of the East/West and North/South Alleyways in Block 36,
West Settlers Historic District.
-3- HPB Minutes 04/05/00
It was moved by Mr. Keller, seconded by Mr. Bodker and passed 6-0 to
recommend to the Planning and Zoning Board approval of the
abandonment of the east/west alleyway and the north/south alleyway,
lying within Block 36, Revised Plat of Block 36, Town of Delray, based
upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.6(0)(5).
D. Consider the Use of Hardboard or Comparable as an Alternative to Wood
Siding for Use on Historic Structures.
The Board felt that it might be an appropriate alternative to wood siding,
especially in the Florida climate. Several members expressed the opinion
that as the cement board is thinner than wood clapboard some texture
and definition of light and shadow would be lost. The Board definitely felt
that the smooth finish is more appropriate for historic structures than the
wood graining. Several Board members were not familiar with how the
product looked after installation and asked that the decision be postponed
until they could view some examples in the area. Staff directed them to
the Sundy Inn property on S. Swinton Avenue where cement board has
been used for new construction. It was the consensus of the Board to
continue this item to their April 19, 2000 meeting.
E. Tandem Parking in Bankers Row, Old School Square Historic District.
It was the consensus of the Board that tandem parking spaces be
permitted for conversions and additions to conversions when there is no
other option to accommodate the parking requirement. However, tandem
parking should not be permitted for new construction.
VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS:
A. Reports from Historic District Representatives
None
B. Board Members
None
C. Staff
None
VII. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:00
P.M.
-4- HPB Minutes 04/05/00
The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information
provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for April 5, 2000, which were
formally adopted and approved by the Board on May 3, 2000.
///////
Diana Mund
If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this
means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and
approval, which may involve some changes.
- 5- HPB Minutes 04/05/00
•
Planning & Zoning Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMBERS
FROM: PAT CAYCE, HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER
DATE: MARCH 31, 2000
Please note, Agenda Item III-A, the Public Hearing for Variance-66, 218 NE 5th Court,
has been postponed.
s'
}-I`IS TOR ID . PR:ESERVAT; IO;N BOARD
STAFF TREPORT
Project Name: COA-410, Patricia Kaufman
Project Location: 235 NE 1st Avenue, Bankers Row, Old School Square Historic
District
ITEM BEFORE TNE . BOARD 3 :
The action requested of the Board is that of approval for a 380 s.f. addition to a
contributing single family residence.
3A.0 KG:RO UN,D
The subject property is a 1,080 s.f. Mackle cottage located on the east side of NE 1st
Avenue between NE 2nd and NE 3rd Streets, in Bankers Row.
D;ESCRIPTION I AN'ALYSIS
The development proposal consists of constructing a 380 s.f. studio/room addition to the
northeast corner (rear) of the residence. The addition will be constructed on the
footprint of a partially enclosed porch, which was demolished several years ago by a
previous owner. The design elements are as follows:
❑ There will be 2 entrances, one on the north and one on the south; a shed roof will
shelter each entrance. The shed roofs will be accented with decorative wood
brackets.
❑ The main roof will have an east/west gable finished in composition shingle to match
the residence. The rear gable end will have a louvered vent and the rafter tails will
be exposed.
❑ The windows and doors will be factory finished white aluminum; the windows will be
single hung sash.
❑ The siding is to be horizontal wood clapboard to match the existing residence.
❑ The addition will be painted to match the residence.
The addition will provide additional living space for this relatively small cottage. The
gable roof is appropriate and will compliment the visual elements of the rear (alley)
elevation. With regard to the windows, aluminum windows are approved for all but the
front elevations of the Mackle cottages; hurricane protection will be provided for with
removable plywood or metal panels. The addition is differentiated from the original
construction by the lowered roofline and opposing gable.
Meeting Date: April 5, 2000
Agenda Item: IV-A
R
HPB Staff Report
COA-410-
Page 2
REVIEW .BY OTHERS"
A courtesy noticed was mailed to all Bankers Row property owners on March 27,2000.
Their comments if any will be available at the meeting.
AL°TERNAT;I;VE '.ACTIO:NS
1. Continue with direction
2. Approve as presented
3. Deny with reasons stated.
RECOMMENDATION.'.
Based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E) Development Standards, approve the
addition as presented.
F i I e/s/pz/h p b/co a-410-ka u f m a n
i
• — N.E. jsr.AVENU — U
PLATTED 50' R/W b g ii
ui LEGAL DESCRIPTION o
N THE SOUTH 44 FEET AND NORTH 11.5 FEET OF LOT 4,BLOCK 74,A Y !fix
SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 74,DELRAY,FLORIDA,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT A 0,1
THEREOF,RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11,PAGE 12 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS
CONCRETE 55.51 WALK 1 OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,FLORIDAAS SURVEYED BY:
GT SURVEYING SERVICES,INC.
4645 H,SUITE 3,SOUTHERN BLVD.
> a WEST PALM BEACH,FLORIDA 33415 yy
cc PROJECT NO.:9984 -
O r
REVISION DATE:2-4-00
w •
w o BUILDING DATA: 4
u i ToEXISTING-UNALTERED-ONE STORY
z a CONDITIONED AREA 1,080 S.F.
v PATIO AREA 380 S.F.
. rr---
COMBINED AREAS(SITE COVERAGE) 1,460 S.F.
•
X}
EXI$TINC WIADDITIONS AND ALTERATIpNS-ONE 3TORY
CONDITIONED AREA 1,080 S.F.
STUDIO AREA 380 S.F a
u COMBINED AREAS(SITE COVERAGE) 1,460 S.F.
EXISTING ONE STORY WOOD w, o
FRAME SINGLE FAMILY MAIN `tea N STORM SHUTTER NOTE: � .
RESIDENCE ALL OPENINGS TO RECEIVE STORM SHUTTERS IN COMPLIANCE WITH /--N
CURRENT PALM BEACH COUNTY CODE REQUIREMENTS. Z
1080 S.F. CONDITIONED AREA _ I > , ,j,..
ACC INDEX OF DRAWINGS
X $HT, DESCRIPTION SI
c0 iiiz METER-�Ir� fj1
a N I 1. COVER SHETPLOTPLAN;DATA p 2. GENERAL CONST ANDDSCS`fIl �, ti 3. EXISTINGSLABIS J a- - 4. FLOOR PLAN @AEA OF ALTERATION AND ADDITI5. ROOF FRAM_ 6. ROOF PLAN @ AREA OF ALTERATION AND ADDITION;NOTES; e
a 7. TYPICAL WALL SECTION;DETAIL �' :
8. EAST ELEVATION
19=8' '61. 21=4' �4 OOj 9. NORTH AND 10. ELECTRICAL PLAN T@ AREA OF ADD ELEVATIONS;ITIONND;ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS
• I111L��� NGINEERING DATA
i PLAN NOTE: iii
U z
THESE PLANS,SCHEDULES,NOTES,ETC.WERE PREPARED BASED ON f-•Z Q 3
• •• I DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED BY THE OWNER AND/OR AGENT AS PREPARED BY:\ U)Z— D a,
PEREZ DESIGN,INC, 004
113 N.E.4TH.AVENUE E �LZJ o a
DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA 7 U. z M
PATIO I PLAN NO.99-009-DATED 7-12-99 Q Q s 0 o
_ REFER TO PLANS ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA FOR 0 Z I-�0 , o
EXISTING ONE STORY WOOD } ADDITIONAL BUILDING DATA. Z U) Q
FRAME GUEST RESIDENCE > z m 0
528 S.F. CONDITIONED AREA ' F = z et ix
F
PATIO ¢ a w MJ aD N
_ J 11.1
N WQ
PLOT PLAN Q
V
�..
1/16 SC. .-- 55.5' I- w o
ALLEY �� N —
COMPOSITION SHINGLE TYPE ROOF COVERING MATERIAL o
INSTALLED OVER 1 LAYER OF 30#FELT TIN TAGGED TO Y AR
I 3/4"C.D.X.EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD ROOF SHEATHING 0 1 f 08
W/1' NONCORROSIVE ROOFING NAILS SPACED 6' O.C.-
ENDS;12'O.C.FIELD AS PER LOCAL GOVERNING CODE Q
MATERIAL TO MATCH EXISTING-VERIFY IN FIELD. 1
24'0 HALF ROUND LOUVERED GABLE END VENT UNIT W/ i 2 0 d
INSECT SCREEN A
ig
BENT NON-CORROSIVE METAL DRIP EDGE OVER 1x2
PRESSURE TREATED WOOD EDGE BOARD OVER 2-BY ag
12 FASCIA BOARD TO MATCH EXISTING-VERIFY IN FIELD.
��� 42'DECORATIVE BRACKETS-SELECTION BY OWNER
VINYL DRIP EDGE INSTALLED UNDER SIDING MATERIAL
AND OVER 1x4 WOOD HEAD TRIM-TYPICAL
�-'-\�=� 1x4 JAMB TRIM AND CORNER BOARDS-TYPICAL a
WOOD LAPPED SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING SIZE AND
-a.--•, (� i PROFILE INSTALLED OVER 1/2'C.D.X EXTERIOR GRADE °.-4 i ii
' 3.\\54 —
1 In _^ ` ! PLYWOOD WALL SHEATHING NONCORROSIVE SIDING
NAILS PER MATERIAL MANUFACTURERS SP
ECS.
`� _
LASS '4
WHITEGREYTIN E.S.P.G T ALUMINUMANDSCREENS-SINGLE HUNGSEE WINDOWFLOORPLAN UNITFOR WI a �
UNIT LOCATIONS AND SIZE
I11
_ I _i� BEVELED 2 BY WOOD SILL MEMBER OVER 1x6 SILL TRIM
BOARD-TYPICAL®WINDOW UNITS Y
-I" • � -•- , 42'HIGH GUARD RAIL AND HANDRAIL TO BE DESIGNED o
AND INSTALLED TO RESIST A 4'0 OBJECT AND RESIST A r 88 MP!
• CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200#APPLIED IN ANY POINT\..
---- '--- IN ANY DIRECTION PER S.B.C.C.I.AND THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH CODE REQUIREMENTS-MATERIAL AND
EAST ELEVATION DESIGN SELECTION BY OWNER. W
, EXISTING POURED CONCRETE STOOP AND STAIRS- p V Zvi
1/4 SC. IREFER TO PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR NOTES f-Z al a o -i
AND DETAILS-ALTER AND/OR ADJUST AS REQUIRED- ZO Q D a
VERIFY IN FIELD. _
o
EXISTING STEM WALL ON SPREAD FOOTING BELOW. Liq w >W Z M
' REFER TO PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR ¢LL Q= o m
CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS. ALTER AND/OR Oz 1-0 -' 0
ADJUST AS REQUIRED-VERIFY IN FIELD. g U)Q •
NOTE; r-ttOO 0
REFER TO PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR EXISTING CO 0
Z g H 4 FOUNDATION,STEM WALL,AND FLOOR SLAB CONSTRUCTION iti
METHODS AND MATERIALS-VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS0 o c'J
IN FIELD-ALTER AS REQUIRED. W N w
a O ►- u
w
w
I x
w
F
i.
•
•
WIND ENGINEERING/ STRUCTURAL NOTES fi
REFERENCE DATA:SBCCI• 1994
WIND LOAD :IIO S.P.H. __ _ Y SR
— V g ,1
EDGE: _------
41 i !i
i _ -- - -- !Y
^ 439ps.E El +39p.s.f �
i N Q L -u�„��.__ - -
EDGE C -32 ps.f❑ in a -45p.s.fi -39p.sftl
-37.pst 432 ps[ m +39Ps.f. +39pst s
432ps.t I 1INTERIOR
-I Z N Z INTERIOR ZONE v _ _ --
• If6:0 WO
MIN. MIN.' - I
• 2:10°%o BUILDING WIDTH (EDGE STRIP) i
I
ONE STORY _ I a
MEAN ROOF HEIGHT:15'MAXIMUM •
COMPONENTS AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURE 37p•s.f. (WORST CASE) .;•_ I—
TWO STORY - :•I
1.
MEAN ROOF HEIGHT:25'MAXIMUM • .____. Z
COMPONENTS AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURE 45.p.s.f. (WORST CASE). • l^
ROOF SHEATHING NORTH ELEVATION a ja
518'C.D.X.EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD ROOF SHEATHING APPLIED WIMINIMUM
8d.NONCORROSIVE COMMON NAILS SPACED 4'OC.ENDS-G'O.C.FIELD. 1/4 SC.4 I.
MASONRY CONSTRUCTION
ALL MASONRY CELLS ADJACENT TO OPENINGS TO BE GROUTED SOLID WITH --_' �� 1
I #5 BAR VERTICAL REINFORCING o
WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION 7.--
ALL WOOD JAMBS ADJACENT TO OPENINGS TO BE FRAMED WITH MINIMUM OF - • )
3-2 BY JACK-STUDS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE ATTACHMENT FOR BUCKS AND •—
HURRICANE SHUTTER ASSEMBLIES --- —
___--__ ,��� — li 1IIIII R If - II I if 11J
GLAZING PROTECTION DESIGN o U a a 0
. THE INSTALLATION OF GLAZING PROTECTION DEVICES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED — — Z W W
IN THE DESIGN OF SUPPORT STRUCTURE AS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: p— Z a
WIND PRESSURES: (n Ill O Z M
0 up7 LL
REFERENCE DATA:SBCCI-1994 - q Q x o
WIND LOAD:110 M.P.H. 0 Z V)4 -1 o
EDGE STRIP.10°/o BUILDING WIDTH•8=0"
_ (4 o
ELEVATION EDGE ZONE INTERIOR ZONE _ — O
PRESSURE SUCTION PRESSURE SUCTION •_ _O 11I� ce
<
FIRST FLOOR +32.p.s.f. -37p.sf. 432p.s.f -32p.S.f. ' `" • �— ►Q- Z Q F
SECOND FLOOR +39 psi -45 p.sf. +39p•s.f. -39p.s.f. • •, • • • OC �aJ ' N
THIRD FLOOR +59p.sf, -68psf. +59psf -59/$.S.f. III Q
REFER TO MASONRY AND WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION NOTES IN WIND r X w o
ENGINEERING/STRUCTURAL NOTES FOR STRUCTURE SUPPORT DESIGN. SOUTH ELEVATION
W
I I/4 SC. a tP
EXISTING STRUCTURE61
EXISTING DOOR AND WINDOW UNITS TO REMAIN o
seRR
_. I---- -: .-------
'— EXISTING'WOOD SIDING TO BE REMOVED- V
-., PREPARE WALL TO RECEIVE GYPSUM BOARD
3068 FULL LT.FR. . „
i —'s I W/14'FIXED SL. CI.�, b
v 2-I/2 351 _.
N
\ -
\ n ul
3068 FULL LT.FR.— ip n; q
I W114'FIXED SL. a
il
•
NEW STUDIO _ ,.e i N
c0 UNCONDITIONED
to
a is
I
.\ •3-I/2 35 I/2 35 N ii
0
N _, �l
--\ v, x D3�4E,S, N i
\ \ a
3-I/2 35 3-I/2 35
v
v 0"I660 4:4' 6:6' 2-0'
,—/
OPENING NOTES / 2) 4, / W
oV Q 3V)
I. WINDOW AND DOOR OPENING SIZES INDICATED ON PLANS ARE GENERIC IN NATURE FLOOR PLAN e AREA OF Z alm 0 "
GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST OPENING SIZES BASED ON SELECTED UNIT p 0R'
MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND SELECTED INTERIOR TRIM PRIOR TO A LT E R AT 10 N AD D I T 10 N C of a o
CONSTRUCTION. 1/4 SC. o w > 1., Z to
2. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL MATERIAL PRODUCT APPROVAL COMPLIANCE qQ Q o
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALTERNATE MATERIAL SELECTIONS TO BE APPROVED BY ❑Z N V o 0 OWNER PRIOR TO PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION. az QQ
3. EMERGENCY EGRESS OPENINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL ROOMS INTENDED FOR �. W o SLEEPING,OR ROOMS WHICH COULD BE SLEEPING ROOMS.EACH OF THESE ROOMS SHALL
HAVE AT LEAST ONE(I)WINDOW OR EXTERIOR EXIT DOOR APPROVED FOR EMERGENCY p U. Ill
Z <
EGRESS OR RESCUE.THE UNITS MUST BE OPERABLE FROM THE INSIDE TO A FULL CLEAR
OPENING WITHOUT THE USE OF SEPARATE TOOLS.WHERE WINDOWS ARE APPROVED AS uJ X M 1 o N A MEANS OF EGRESS,THEY SHALL HAVE A SILL HEIGHT OF NOT MORE THAN FOURTY FOUR
(44)INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR.ALL EGRESS OR RESCUE WINDOWS FROM SLID I f p y
ROOMS MUST HAVE A MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING OF FIVE AND SEVEN TEN 7)
SQUARE FEET.THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING HEIGHT SHALL BE TWENTY m(24) lao
INCHES.THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING WIDTH SHALL BE TWENTY(20)INCHES.
JSOPNG(WP) w ��-
•-•
-
..--'
..,.-, ,—k. • ::,•
- --- -4:....‘;[ 7`-- .1, •
..•
•
41
-..
.-., K..::"...../.'...).
.4.7,:f.44if'.'' • •" ''• %.• - .i.
'',...„._
SP.trela.4.i* .•: , ... .-..---,.
....Z."*. , - ..4 . '... .
'... .:'',....V. 14.:.C1...,..-• - . . ...
. .. .
, • ....441i';t:':'.* . ... . . •
$.1: • . 1
,.
••-:4,.
.....4 $4i4ITZ.S.1,.....
..--".----.
1
I _..,.._• 71,:v.:
IF . •
t ,., l„--:.0-.4,/; -:...4:,L..: .. .. -
1I et.
• „I
.. . .
- --:
•.1.1i'i \ 1' '
--- .•I\ ' 1 `, \ 1) ,\ I. ;'-'•'?: t:s•;-- ..
4'...4.
, ..
4...... ..
•
11111'
t .
1 • .: lI • ••• 1 .
• 0 , it,
1 I II i I .1 \
• .•
....
-.I
_. - !
tl .
1 IL
•
1. t,
.• e____-7-;-, kc)e-a-1-1 i....)
-
r),.\_/-.A\ \;
_L_ l I I I I I I I I ) I I I I I f �� 1 -
- L A K E I D A R O A D (N.W. 4TH ST.) N.E. 4TH ST.
POST 0
- CASON OFFICE
_ METHODIST
- CHURCH w
D
Z II:
w > > a> > > a <__a aQN.W. 3RD ST. N.E- 3RD w.i>> a EN -a '>-
_ Ell MIN
— CITY I-2 � �_
— ATTORNEY �� �N "BUILDING ^= = ?_
]' cr
! � � _
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE (N.W. 2ND ST.) N.E. 2ND ST
_ o v' Z
z r IMil
— N 0 3
> . W
0 Q >
Z C
0 L.„ I. a
Z <,
cr
Z CITY
a
HALL to z
E.
IL'
N.W. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST.
z I
v
.1 r.
§ COMMUNITY w w
z z CENTER ..
Z z
ii
TENNIS OLD
STADIUM SCHOOL
SQUARE I I z
ATLANTIC AVENUE
IIII
4 Q� 1 wl >
fc— a > a
__o
N N N0 if-
;
3 3 § W W W
C (n N In——N ,i Vl
/ ,
N--...r- KAUFMAN PROPERTY
AVENUE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL -235 ME. 1ST AVEN -
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
\ /
-- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM294
STAFF REPORT
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
Project Name: COA-339-Continuation, Liz Bold, Owner.
Project Location: 1104 Nassau Street
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The action requested of the Board is that of approval of COA-339 to allow a wood shake
roof to be replaced with architectural dimensional composition shingles.
BACKGROUND
On February 18, 1998 the Board approved the enclosure of a screened porch to create
a room addition on the east elevation of this contributing single family residence. On
October 7, 1998 a porch/deck was approved for the new room addition.
DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS...
The existing wood shake roof was installed
less than 12 years ago. Cost of replacement $13,680.00
Cost of proposed composition shingles $6,943.00
The roof is in very poor condition and needs full replacement. The proposal is to
remove the wood shakes, replace the underlying plywood and install Owens Corning
Oakridge Architectural composition shingles. The color will be harbor blue; photos will
be available at the meeting.
The wood shakes are not original to the structure. The original roof was flat cement tile;
the shakes were installed sometime after 1988. The proximity of this house to the
ocean undoubtedly effects the life span of wood shakes due to the greater amount of
salt damage the roof is subjected to. The quality of the proposed composition shingles
is excellent and will not detract from the character of the building or the historic district.
Based upon the fact that the shake roof is not original to the structure and that the life
span of wood shakes in such close proximity to the ocean is less than would be
expected elsewhere in the City, staff is recommending approval of the composition
shingles.
Meeting Date:April 5, 2000
Agenda Item: IV-B
wr
HPB Staff Report
COA-339-Continuation
Page 2
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Continue with direction.
2. Deny, with reasons stated.
3. Approve as presented.
RECOMMENDATION ,
Based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E), approve the change of roofing material
as presented.
Fi le/pz/h p b/coa-339-contd-bold-sr
e
•
L / .d L%�
SP 5.7,es
(,�� �•�'p 41 L -72 1.l1:• 7C/2 id-.4 7?' 4,i= 7FLi� � y' 7 c„,
,CANo w 7N ? .95 --/S 1.L r< : i2 E' 77 Al 6.- ,'J r./ /a t.)4.
> i
H/n/ L h o fig.e m 1 7 /9 5 o Pry os ,3 7 c
• P /2rr, 1 T , t c.t-=4" AI a Y. E. N Do 2- /f CG&d- . 4 6 i0 = rAFO,rr)
' c a, v s 6 c 1i 3 Gr h1[- P,21 G r / (AA/ .4;s. v y% 4?e.[' i-
I ; /�t:- c S•i 777-1E. Ace IC x- 4 c .DER 5i1 020G/= L(.1 n
(20,v 5/6 ff:/ E.i.o 724 s �! /�t_ c )C.%J d T A}A-I•e (.J :77-- G' E: ),,,9 7_>
• �F�/ /� &-) PE. L.Ae5T /0 -/.3 5 .191Z _ cv/)-
1 S 1/ Lr'E ie S A A-/J C. ZS P.6r4-7i,L LI' "le-S.0 S g e e f x)L 14‹: ,
�f^t E . �.5p 6, A-7 51- 17-4,6.S. GL N,-9 C :9 RE (v i
'7-,‘1A, 4•4iJ 5Hi/•.i6.LZ-S. -771 E .4. ter/-E XP�
4 p y 4 kf s ; .A Iv d '•n c-o ni s r,c7 ere e l se e ''r�r<
£ r A// /15.r0/,1.A-V 1--7• • /-f /I•I Lg.S• `% c 7-E,9m f,e2 `;.,9/ 'i7- 042 4
/-f/N 6-1.--61 S �'j EA• 46 71-I E. /v o z-7-1 A 6— • .4 iL i_? .
5 F.l 4/N 6- fJ FA c i--1 !-f i.iv(,-G cr, •
UeQ/h/6.- 7 7-1 €. leg A37 hiG-• /2o c'- sS , Lea ,%f/e /r.1'6"-
-7 /'1 7,-4 it.),0 S ./.7,1)•/ $0 //496.6 d Li=F I,S <sc.,! :� r f_}
s
I I
VETERANS BARB N In
PARK I TERRACE j c W ry
• ATLANTIC
DELRAY BEACH
COJD0 _ o< o
I 1 PLAZA In MARRIOT
Z I <L., N <
ATLANTIC AVENUE
- - I ® .III II II II III
1 I WATERWAY EAST NW( > ,5�
I
i K1
COMMERCIAL —I,—1 K�I 1
;� CONDO � � ; i r
' i , r
1-- I Z I K L7
I ; IIo I J1
< c BARHARBOUR f i I= I
I } I P I
CONDO + I I I I
S.E. t ST S I I �MIR I,AR STREET 11 I I I l C
Ilill ef
W III 1 . Illlll >
,1 Illlll I
C W
OCEAN PLACE
CONDO
I l m
lI COCONUT ROW
I1 i I I I I I z
I I INGRAHAM IAVNU. i
S.S. 2ND ST. I I I I I W
I= I I ( OCEAN TERR. U
AN 7 RP,. I
SEA GA i U
II
TOWERS
_ , INIAISISIAIU)�' 1 I ISIT.I I I I
IIIIII �
J I
( C 1
i i! Illlll ,
W
S.E. 3RD Si. (I) I > SAY STREET C1
v
a
LANIKAI
0
U VILLAS CONDO
:.,
LANCER WAY •�,
I I \
vi
I z , J1 1
ROAD
S.S. 4TH ST. I SEAGA IL CASUARINA 1
I \ MANOR I'. I
I LJ
I I I InI IW2r--I I I N I IRIJiiii 9'
N- - BOLD RESIDENCE
OTY OF D LRAY SEACM. FL
PLANNING &ZONING ➢=PART4A:NT
►AAP REF: LMA215
H:'ISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARkD
STAFF REPORT
Project Name: Pre-Application, Eric Carlstrom, applicant and owner.
Project Location: 34 N. Swinton Avenue, School Square Historic District
1TEM BEFORE THE BOARD „_..
The action requested of the Board is to review the proposal and give comments and
direction to the applicant. No formal action is required.
BA'Cic c tyND
The structure located on the subject property was constructed in 1922 in the vernacular
style, with bungalow type porch piers. The HPB reviewed a proposal submitted by Mr.
Carlstrom to rehabilitate the building on May 12, 1999. At that meeting the Board
approved the renovation with the condition that the owner return for approval of roof
finish, exterior paint colors and type of hurricane protection. The project was started but
never completed.
ANALYSIS ! DESCRIPTION_
The owner is now proposing to demolish the structure and construct a 3-story office
building. The proposed building will be approximately 7,080 s.f. and will be constructed
approximately to the building setback lines. Parking in the OSSHAD zoning district is
calculated at 1 space for 300 s.f., approximately 24 spaces will be required. All of the
parking will be located off site in spaces purchased from the CRA.
Before commenting on the design elements of the building, the Board should consider
the impact of the proposal's components to the Swinton Avenue streetscape and to the
historic district as follows:
❑ The existing historic structure will be demolished.
❑ The building will be 3 stories tall.
❑ The building will be built approximately to the setback lines
❑ All parking will be located off site.
File/s/pz/hpb/34 N Swinton, Carlstrom-pre-ap
Meeting Date:April 5, 2000
Agenda Item: IV-C
4.
I . II — I
11 >• 11 I I I W I . I
1 i ; <
1 I, i
N.W. II 3RD I ST. N . 3RD ST.
I
1 I < ! I I I
1 i I I
1
—,c
i CITY V' '
IATTORNEY I
3UlLDlNG I 1 o - '
1;7) c I I I N
(-
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.S. 2ND ST.
d
I Z � ■
I -It I w rga
ii I >I
I lI 3 CITY <I
L- I II HALL I 1 W
i`
l I I Il I I II I I I
N.W. 1ST ST. I N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST.
1 I I i ICI Li
'..
= I 1
I COMM UNITY� I 1
I zI I A.'TER
1
1 I I I d r �
_I i i_TENNIS II OLD q 1
11
STADIUr✓, I 1 SCHOOL
) SQU R
I1 . l
ATLANTIC AVENUE
IIIII POLICE SOUTH i
( �Z
COMPLEX COUNTY �; I
< << COURT '< I O > v`,
HOUSE I I ` : IL
L1 1 I Z1 r
I 1 �i ILA ` I
EL71 C _N I ILn1 1�1
1 I I U I -I 1-1
S.K'. 1ST ST. I S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST.
n 1 I l u`I IF :
I I l I I I N
HP tri I 1--1-1. 3.
V1
IW I t/j.
I II Cm it 1 I 4 NI I N
N .
-issor- 34 N. SWINTON AVENUE
CITY DF DELRAY BEADY.. FL
PLANNING $ ZDNING DEPARTMENT
-- D/LVTAL BASE MAP srsrEw -- . MA? REF: LM226
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
STAFF MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION REGARDING THE
POTENTIAL ACQUISITION OF THREE LOTS IN BLOCK 69, OLD
SCHOOL SQUARE HISTORIC ARTS DISTRICT, FOR PARKING
ITEM BEFORE T H,E ;BOARD
The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission
regarding the possible acquisition of Lots 19, 23, and 24 within Block 69, associated
with the proposed public/GRIP parking garage. At the City Commission meeting of
March 21, 2000, the Commission considered whether or not to direct the CRA to
acquire these additional lots. Prior to making a decision, the Commission deferred the
item to both the HPB and CRA for review and recommendation.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
As you know, the Worthing Place project includes the construction of a parking garage
on Block 69 that will be used for parking by the general public and by the GRIP building.
As proposed, the garage would occupy three of the six lots located within the portion of
Block 69 that was the subject of the recently adopted text amendment allowing the
establishment of specified CBD uses. These lots (Lots 20, 21, and 22) are in the
middle of the block (see attached exhibit). The properties to the north (Lots 23 and 24)
and to the south (Lot 19) contain single story structures (see attached photos).
The site plan for the garage was discussed at recent meetings of the Historic
Preservation Board (HPB) and Parking Management Advisory Board (PMAB). As
proposed, the garage will provide slightly more than 200 spaces in a building that is
approximately 36 feet in height. It was suggested at both meetings that if more property
could be acquired, the height of the structure could be reduced, or additional spaces
added.
The developer of Block 77 can construct a garage on Lots 20-22 that is attractive and
compatible with adjacent properties, and provides the required number of spaces.
However, staff of both the CRA and Planning and Zoning Department think the
acquisition of one or more of the adjacent lots would be beneficial for a number of
reasons. If the properties to the north were acquired, the east/west alley could be
widened, providing for improved traffic circulation and loading space behind the
restaurants on Atlantic Avenue. Also, the garage could be designed to provide a
gradual transition between the 32' high Masonic Lodge (Yama) building and the single
story structures to the south. Another potential benefit is an increase in the number of
public parking spaces that could be provided. If the garage were to occupy all six lots,
approximately 420 spaces could be built in a 30' high continuous ramp garage with a
very gradual slope.
Meeting Date: April 5,2000
Agenda Item: V.A.
The negative aspects of the proposal are that it would require relocation of the existing
structures, and it will incur costs that were not previously anticipated with this garage.
Potential sites for relocation include lots within the OSSHAD district, the West Settlers
district, or Osceola Park. The CRA has funds available from a 1997 bond issue that
were already earmarked for downtown parking that could be used for the acquisition. A
continuous ramp garage is relatively inexpensive to construct, and there may be some
cost savings realized if the currently proposed subgrade parking is eliminated.
The lots within Block 69 are not specifically identified in the Community Redevelopment
Plan as a potential parking site, therefore, the City Commission must direct the CRA to
pursue acquisition of the lots. The lots may be acquired by gift, purchase, or eminent
domain.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Discuss the potential acquisition of Lots 19, 23, and 24 for public parking, and make a
recommendation to the City Commission.
Attachments:
• Map of Subject Properties
♦ Photos of Structures on Lots 19, 20, and 24
ATLANTIC AVENUE
z %l /j!!!/((
W J/JjJJJ71
W
Q /%%3
< <
LOT 22
/a/zX ►li'' LK 77
• Z LOT 2\ N
0
%, W
�— LOT 20 194
tfrz
LO ` W
V J
S. E. 1ST ST.
• N PORTION OF BLOCK 69
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL \ \�— PROPOSED GARAGE LOCATION - LOTS FOR POTENTIAL ACQUISITION
PLANNING do ZONING DEPARTMENT I
-- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM404
30 SE 1st Avenue
1925 Mission Revival
'1i ..... — ..... _ ... •=,...11114.10
T _ •
-ir iit--_:.-:=-- -1.4''' '''- ,-:'-' ___, _
_ . _..__ . .
___..............„ = . .., _
_ ...,„..._,. . ._
__ _,_.,
..,._ t„,,... _ .. ,.. ...
___ .._. .. .. .. ... ..
__ _ __. ...._ ,._.. ..,... _,..... .
__._
- •
Front
•
1I' p', k.:
, itr •
t -/ - * , 0, . ;,'ik- %•2-, *-re • .
- 111. r 4'''•s 4 i
*i -,* Vi*31(4_ ..".^-- 4.' . i , ' 7 . 4/1 it,' 4
.t 1
F
r
s.a
f - - rt-�t- . r.
Rear
1-6t 1 CI
It- - i.
- .'Y lid.+ - i
-
L '-
•
t= r ii _ t� Via^
12 SE 1st Avenue
1919 Vernacular
"1"`
.49r--.
is 1.S� ..lyp'r • +!
tr.' sue__ >. w
..4
`. � � - 4Ir
7_ -
. -44. -.....
._ } `� off {
1 -
- _ R - ; y
1- _
s #r j ',
' _ -
_
t
12 1/2 SE 1st Avenue
1951
i
V
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO LDR SECTIONS 4.1.4(C), 4.3.1(D) AND 5.1.6(A)
ESTABLISHING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTING RELIEF TO
CERTAIN MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD"-
The action requested of the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City
Commission with respect to the approval of an amendment to the Land Development
Regulations establishing notification requirements when granting relief to the minimum
lot dimension provisions. The amendment also provides that the Historic Preservation
Board may grant waivers (for historic properties) to allow the development of a
nonconforming lot of record which is under the same ownership as the adjacent lot.
The City Commission Documentation and Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report are
attached for additional information.
ANALYSIS
Objections to the proposed ordinance were raised by both the City Commission and
City Manager with respect to giving the Historic Preservation Board waiver power to
LDR Section 4.1.4(C) to allow construction on substandard lots. While the City
Commission recommended denial of the ordinance on first reading, the Commission
requested that prior to reconsidering an amended ordinance, comments be obtained
from the Historic Preservation Board on the proposed change.
Currently requests for waivers to Section 4.1.4 (C) for historic properties are reviewed
by the Historic Preservation Board which forwards a recommendation to the City
Commission for final action. The ordinance as proposed gives the Board the authority
to waive the requirement of Section 4.1.4 (C), to allow the development of a
nonconforming lot of record which is under the same ownership as the adjacent lot in
light of the fact that the Board is empowered to allow substandard lots through the
variance process.
As proposed in the ordinance the granting of such relief would be subject to the
provisions of LDR Section 2.4.7(B) whereby the Board would have to make specific
findings and a notice of such action by the Board provided to all property owners within
500 feet of the subject property.
RECOMMENDATION .�... .. -.
Board review and comment.
Attachments: P&Z Staff Report of February 28, 2000
City Commission Documentation of March 7, 2000
Meeting Date: April 5, 2000
Agenda Item: V-B
•
:__'CITY;COM MISS ION-DOCUMENTATION_- z _
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
'.
THRU: DIANE DOMINGUEZ, DIRECTOR OF PLAN G Z• ING
FROM: JASMIN ALLEN, PLANNER Cr( -141-, a.t,r-0')--c
SUBJECT: MEETING OF MARCH 7, 2 0
CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO LDR SECTIONS 4.1.4(C),
4.3.1(D) AND 5.1.6(A) ESTABLISHING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR
GRANTING RELIEF TO CERTAIN MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS
—„ 'Relief from the minimum lot dimension requirements may be granted by the Board of
Adjustment or the City Commission. While the City Commission may create substandard lots if it
is determined to be necessary and appropriate to create such nonconformity, unlike a variance
the City Commission's action does not require the provision of public notices to the surrounding
property owners. Notice requirements are established for variances in that the action of a
variance relates to a development standard which has the potential to impact adjacent property
owners. Thus, similarly to a variance, relief from the minimum lot dimension provisions by the
City Commission should be subject to the same notification requirements.
The proposed amendment requires that the City provide mailed notices ten calendar (10) days
prior to a meeting, to all property owners within five hundred feet of the perimeter of the
property for which relief is being sought. The amendment also allows the Historic Preservation
Board to grant waivers (for historic properties) to allow the development of a nonconforming lot
of record which is under the same ownership as the adjacent lot. Such waivers will also be
required to be noticed. Additional background and an analysis of the request are found in the
attached Planning and Zoning Board staff report.
PPLANNING:ANDZONING BOARD_CONSIDERATION WM
The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing regarding this item at its meeting of
February 28, 2000. There was no public testimony regarding the request. The Board voted 5-1
(Morris absent, McCarty dissenting) to recommend approval of the proposed amendments,
based upon a positive finding that the amendment is consistent with and furthers the Goals,
Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By motion, approve on first reading a text amendment to LDR Sections 4.1.4(C), 4.3.1(D) and
5.1.6(A) to establish notification procedures for granting relief from the minimum lot dimension
requirements and providing that the Historic Preservation Board may grant waivers to the
requirement to allow the development of a nonconforming lot of record which is under the same
ownership as the adjacent lot based upon the findings and recommendation of the Planning &
Zoning Board.
Attachments: P&Z Staff Report and Documentation of February 28, 2000
Ordinance by Others
•
PNNINGAND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2000
AGENDA ITEM: IV.G - AMENDMENT TO LDR SECTION 4.1.4(C);
SECTION 4.3.1(D) AND SECTION 5.1.6 (A)
ESTABLISHING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
FOR GRANTING RELIEF TO THE MINIMUM LOT
DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS
ITEM`BEFO.RE THE BOARD„
The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City
Commission regarding an amendment to LDR Section 4.1.4 (C) Use of Lots of
Record, Section 4.3.1(D) Application of District Regulations; and, Section 5.1.6
(A) Compliance with Zoning Regulations, establishing notification requirements
for granting relief to the minimum lot dimension requirements pursuant to LDR
Section 2.4.5(M).
Pursuant to Section 1.1.6, an amendment to the Land Development Regulations
may not be made until a recommendation is obtained from the Planning and
Zoning Board.
BACKGROUND._.
Historically, relief to the minimum lot requirements has always necessitated a
variance through the Board of Adjustment. With the adoption of the revised LDRs
in 1990, procedures for obtaining relief from this and other code provisions were
established. Relief such as waivers, internal adjustments and special Board
actions were allowed by the Board taking action on the development application.
However, relief from the minimum lot dimension requirements could only be
granted by the Board of Adjustment or the City Commission.
In contrast to a variance, the City Commission may grant relief to the minimum
lot requirements without any formal notification procedures. In October 1999, a
request was received to subdivide the property located at 704 N. Swinton
Avenue in order to create two lots and construct a single family home. The
property was located within the R-1-AA (Single Family Residential) zoning district
and the proposed subdivision of the property did not conform to the minimum
size and width requirements. However, there was historical significance to an
existing single family residence on the lot which was constructed in 1924, by the
City's first registered architect, Samuel Ogren Sr. The applicant was willing to
have the house placed on the Local Register of Historic Places in exchange for
being able to construct a second home on the newly created substandard lot.
The request was considered by the City Commission and was not
processed as a variance, since the City Commission may create substandard
t
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Establishing Notification Requirements for Granting Relief to the Minimum Lot Dimension
Requirements—LDR Text Amendment
Page 2
lots if it is determined to be necessary and appropriate to create such
nonconformity. Residents of the area learned of the action a few days before the
meeting and organized to object to the subdivision, which was ultimately denied.
During the City Commission hearing it was suggested that the Commission's
action was paramount to the granting of a variance with no formal notice
provision made to the surrounding property owners. Notice requirements are
established for variances in that the action of a variance relates to a development
standard which has the potential to impact adjacent property owners. As such,
relief from a code requirement which would otherwise necessitate a variance
should be noticed similarly.
AN:ALYS<lS
The minimum lot dimension requirements are established in Section 4.3.4(K)
Development Standards Matrix. Section 2.2.4(D)(3)(a), states that the Board of
Adjustment (this also applies to the Historic Preservation Board acting in-lieu of
the Board of Adjustment for historic properties) may grant relief from the General
Development Standards set forth in Section 4.3.
Variances from either the Board of Adjustment or the Historic Preservation Board
pursuant to Section 2.4.2(B)(1)(f) and (g), require that a notice mailed no later
than ten (10) days prior to the public hearing be provided to the owners of all
property located within five hundred feet (500') of the property on which the
variance is being sought.
In addition to Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix which establishes
the minimum lot dimension requirements the following provisions regarding lot
requirement standards are also setforth:
Section 4.1.4 (C) Use of Lots of Record: In residential zoning districts other
than R-1-A, if two (2) or more adjoining lots (or combination of lots and portions
of lots) of record are under the same ownership at the time of passage or
amendment of this ordinance, and if the total frontage and the total area is equal
to or greater than that which is required by the zoning district regulations, said
property shall not be developed except in accordance with the minimum frontage
and lot area requirements of the district. Ownership shall be determined by the
property tax rolls on file in the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Office as
of the effective date of this ordinance.
Section 4.3.1(D), Application of District Regulations: No yard or lot existing at
the time of the passage of this chapter, shall be reduced in area or dimensions
below the minimum requirements set forth herein. Lots or yards created after the
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Establishing Notification Requirements for Granting Relief to the Minimum Lot Dimension
Requirements—LDR Text Amendment
Page 3
effective date of this chapter shall meet the minimum requirements established
by this chapter unless the City Commission declares at the time of approval of an
associated development application that it is necessary and appropriate to create
such a nonconformity.
Section 5.1.6 Compliance with Zoning Regulations:
(A) General: All subdivisions shall conform with, at least the minimum zoning
regulations applicable to the property being subdivided i.e. a nonconforming
situation cannot be created through the act of subdivision unless a variance to
such effect is approved by the Board of Adjustment prior to action on a
preliminary subdivision plat. However, conditions of approval which require
mitigation of such a situation may be affixed to the approval of final plat in lieu of
pursuing a variance.
It is through these provisions that relief (other than that of a variance) may be
obtained by the City Commission. The City Commission has granted relief under
the three code provisions cited above either through the creation of the
subdivision with specific conditions which mitigates the impacts pursuant to
Section 5.1.6(A) or by specifically determining that the creation of nonconforming
lot is necessary and appropriate as required by Section 4.3.1(D) .
Additionally, requests for relief have been approved by the City Commission to
allow the development of lots of record which are substandard where there were
two or more adjoining lots which were and under the same ownership. These
requests were processed as waivers pursuant to Section 2.4.7(B)(1)(b) Special
Power to the City Commission which states "Notwithstanding, the City
Commission may grant a waiver to any provision of these regulations when there
is no other avenue for relief available in these regulations. However, waivers
shall not be considered with respect to:
(i) Matters which pertain to the use of land or structures;
(ii) A requirement for a public hearing or providing notice that an item will be
considered by a development board;
(iii) A regulation for which it is stated that there shall be no waiver and/or
variance provided.
In each case no formal notification procedure was required. While "Special
Courtesy" notices are provided to the neighborhood association representatives,
these notices are required once an item is set on an agenda which does not
always allow sufficient time to notice individual residents.
Relief from the code requirements other than those contained in the General
Development Standards may be obtained by processing waivers, internal
adjustments and special actions. Such actions should not require specific
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report
Establishing Notification Requirements for Granting Relief to the Minimum Lot Dimension
Requirements—LDR Text Amendment
Page 4
notification as those code provisions primarily pertain to functions internal to the
site. On the other hand, relief to a development standard listed in Section
4.3.4(K) such as setbacks, lots size and dimensions and open space lends itself
to impacting adjacent properties and thus the variance mechanism is established
whereby the adjacent property owners are made aware of such actions.
Likewise, the provisions for granting relief by the City Commission for lot
dimensions requirements should carry the same notification requirements.
The proposed amendment would therefore require that the City provide mailed
notices to property owners within five hundred feet of the perimeter of the
property for which relief is being sought and establishes a specific timeframe of
ten calendar (10) days prior to the meeting when such notices shall be mailed.
Additionally, the amendment allows the Historic Preservation Board to grant
waivers (for historic properties) to the requirement to allow the development of a
nonconforming lot of record which is under the same ownership as the adjacent
lot. These waivers would be noticed as described above.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES:
The goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan were reviewed and
there are no applicable goals, objectives or policies noted.
REVIEW BY OTHERS
The proposal is not site specific and thus does not fall under the review authority
of the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA); the Downtown Development
Authority (DDA); or the Historic Preservation Board.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By motion, recommend to the City Commission that LDR Section 4.1.4 (C) Use
of Lots of Record, Section 4.3.1(D) Application of District Regulations; and,
Section 5.1.6 (A) Compliance with Zoning Regulations be amended to establish
notification procedures for granting relief from the minimum lot dimension
requirements and providing that the Historic Preservation Board may grant
waivers to the requirement to allow the development of a nonconforming lot of
record which is under the same ownership as the adjacent lot, based upon
positive finding with LDR Section 2.4.5(M)(5), that the text amendment is
consistent with and furthers the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Attachment:
o Proposed Amendment
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
Section 4.1.4 Use of Lots of Record:
(C) In residontial zoning districts other than R 1 A, Except for single family
residences subject to the R-1-A (Single Family Residential) zoning district
standards, if two (2) or more adjoining lots (or combination of lots and portions of
lots) of record were under the same ownership at tho time of passage or
amendmont of this ordinanco as of October 18, 1994, and if the total frontage
and the total area is equal to or greater than that which is required by the zoning
district regulations, said property shall not be developed except in accordance
with the minimum frontage and lot area requirements of the district. Ownership
shall be determined by the property tax rolls on file in the Palm Beach County
Property Appraiser's Office as of the effectivo date of this ordinance October 18,
1994.
Notwithstanding the above, a waiver to this requirement may be granted
pursuant to the provisions of LDR Section 2.4.7(B) by the Historic Preservation
Board for properties located within designated historic districts, or designated as
historic sites, or properties listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. The
City shall provide notice by mail of such action before the Historic Preservation
Board. Notice shall be provided pursuant to Section 2.4.2(B)(1)(n) to the owners
of all property located within five hundred feet (500') of the perimeter of the
property on which the waiver is being sought. The notice shall be mailed no later
than ten (10) calendar days prior to the meeting before the Historic Preservation
Board.
Section 4.3.1 Application of District Regulations:
(D) No yard or lot existing at the time of the passage of this chapter shall be
reduced in area or dimension below the minimum requirements set forth herein.
Lots or yards created after October 1, 1990, tho effective date of this chapter
shall meet the minimum requirements established by this chapter unless the City
Commission declares at the time of approval of an associated development
application that it is necessary and appropriate to create such a nonconformity.
Notwithstanding the above, the City shall provide notice by mail of any such
action before the City Commission. Notice shall be provided pursuant to Section
2.4.2(B)(1)(n) to the owners of all property located within five hundred feet
(500') of the perimeter of the property on which the action is being sought. The
notice shall be mailed no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the meeting
before the City Commission.
Section 5.1.6 Compliance with Zoning Regulations:
(A) General: All subdivisions shall conform with, at least, the minimum zoning
regulations applicable to the property being subdivided i.e. a nonconforming
situation cannot be created through the act of subdivision unless a variance
to such effect is approved by the Board of Adjustment, or relief granted by
the City Commission pursuant to Section 4.3.1(D) prior to action on a
proliminary subdivision plat.
lieu of pursuing a variance.
•
Planning & Zoning Department
z ` r
1 MEMORANDUM
+Pqy
TO: H.P.B. Board Me fibers )
FROM: Daniel Marfin
Senior planner
DATE: March 31, 2000
RE: Abandonment of Alleyways in Block 36
This subject alleyway represents the entire east-west alley and north-south alley in
Block 36, Revised Plat of Block 36, Town of Delray (Plat Book 5, Page 38). The east-
west alley is a 16' x 287.20 rectangular shaped parcel containing 4,595 square feet, and
the north-south is a 16' x 448.2' rectangular shaped parcel containing 7,171 square feet.
Together the two parcels equal 11,766 square feet or 0.27 acres.
The east-west alley is currently paved and runs behind the Westside Liquors building,
between N.W. 3rd Avenue and N.W. 4th Avenue. The north-south alley is currently
unimproved and runs from N.W. 1st street to the east-west alley.
The abandonment request was submitted by the Community Redevelopment Agency,
which owns Lots 1-15 & Lots 22-39. The CRA has issued a Request for Proposal (RFP)
for a private "for-profit" company to aggregate the individual parcels and their portion of
the proposed abandonment area, and develop a uniform project on the site. This
abandonment and subsequent RFP was previously reviewed at the HPB meeting of
January 13, 2000.
The Mt. Olive Baptist Church owns lots 16-21, and is the only other property owner on
the subject block. Lots 16-21 currently function as a parking lot for the church, and are
not included in the RFP.
Block 36 north of the east-west alley, is located within the West Settlers Historic District.
cc:
c:\aabans\active projects\block 36\block36.doc
.... ....„%
N.W. 1ST ST.
MT. 13 12
OLIVE 14 �.
BAPTIST ;
CHURCH ; 15 11
Q 16 :; Q
17 10
I-
d- 20 '� Cr
21 8
22 ;
• 5
OLIVE z 24'
BAPTIST 25 •
•
••• 4
CHURCH 26 : 3
27 i2 2
28 '►: 1
.
TENNIS
STADIUM
ATLANTIC AVENUE
POLICE SOUTH COUNTY
COMPLEX COURT HOUSE
�_ ABANDONMENT
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL - BLOCK 36 -
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
-- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM --
p LRAY BEACH
betzt
AII•AnericaCity
1993
NOTICE
THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
The April 19, 2000 Historic Preservation Board's Regular Meeting has been Canceled.
The next Board Meeting will be held on May 3, 2000.
b/7
Pat Cayc
Historic Preservation Planner
POSTED ON: APRIL 13, 2000