Loading...
HPB-05-01-02 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: May 1, 2002 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 6:05 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott, Rhonda Sexton, Jim Keavney, Donnamarie Sloan. MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Robert Tefft, and Debra Garcia, II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of November 7, 2001 were before the Board for consideration. Ms. McDermott made the motion to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 6-0. The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of November 14, 2001 were before the Board for consideration. Ms. McDermott was absent from this meeting and abstained from the vote. Ms. Sloan made the motion to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 5 — 0 . III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. Management Systems, 8 NE 2"d Street, New Construction within the Old School Square Historic District, Jeffrey Silberstein, Architect Action Before the Board: Approval of COA-2002-038, which incorporates a Class II Site Plan modification, landscape plan and reconsideration of a condition of site plan approval in association with the development proposal for Management Systems, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(b). Ms. Shay presented the item. The applicant submitted a modified site plan depicting changes to the parking area, as well as a landscape plan, which had not been previously reviewed by the Board. At its meeting of April 17, 2002, the HPB approved three (3) waivers associated with the proposed landscape plan and site plan modification. However, the actual site plan modification and landscape plan were tabled pending the applicants return to the Board for reconsideration on an original condition of approval pertaining to the dedication of five feet (5') of right-of-way for NE 1st Avenue. The Board gave instructions that the applicant should return on May 1, 2002 for a hearing on the reconsideration of the condition of approval, and that the site plan modification and landscape plan could return to the Board at the discretion of the applicant. The reconsideration of the condition of approval, and the approvals of the site plan modification and landscape plan are now before the Board for action. The following relates to the landscape plan and reconsideration of the condition of approval regarding right-of-way dedication. Mr. Jeffrey Silberstein addressed the Board and withdrew the request regarding the right-of-way dedication. Robert Tefft, Planner, explained in detail the reasoning behind the handicapped striping extending across the entire drive aisle. Mr. Tefft brought before the Board an example of the light detail that is proposed to be placed on this property. After much Board discussion, it was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6 — 0 to approve the COA and associated Class II site plan modification for Management Systems, based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. Address all Site Plan Technical Items listed in the staff report of April 17, 2002, and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans; and, 2. (New) That the handicapped striping be removed from across the center of the parking lot; and, 3. (Modified) That a light fixture be installed at the west end of the parking area and that a photometric plan be in compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8 is provided. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 6 — 0 to approve the COA and associated landscape plan for Management Systems, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following conditions: -2- HPB Minutes 5/01/02 1. Address all Landscape Plan Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans; 2. That the Live Oaks are planted so as to provide at least one (1) tree every 30'; 3. That the proposed Alexander Palms within the landscape island adjacent to NE 1st Avenue are replaced with a Pink Tabebuia; and, 4. (New) The Live Oak be moved from the southwest corner of the building to the northwest corner. At this point on the agenda Ms. Elliott stepped down from the Board. B. 4 NE 2nd Street, Non-Contributing residence in the Old School Square Historic District, Jeffrey Silberstein, Agent. Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a non- contributing single family home in the Old School Square Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6 (J). Ms. Shay presented the item. The proposal is to demolish the existing structure to accommodate the construction of a new office/retail building on the property. Prior to purchasing the property, the buyer would like some assurance that the house may be demolished. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5 — 0 (Elliott abstaining) to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the non-contributing dwelling at 4 NE 2nd Street, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)with the following condition: 1) That a site plan for any new development on the property be submitted and approved by the Board prior to the issuance of a demolition permit. At this point on the agenda Ms. Elliott returned to the Board. IV. Reports and Comments A. Public Comments: None -3- HPB Minutes 5/01/02 B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: None D. Staff: Ms. Shay presented the poster contest winner to the Board. The poster had been scanned and put into "poster" form and was being distributed around Delray to promote Preservation Week, which is May 12th through 18th. Ms. Shay then reminded the Board that 1st reading of the Fox Fontaine historic designation ordinance will be at the City Commission meeting on May 7th and that the Board's attendance is requested at this City Commission meeting. The Board was informed that Mr. Simon had resigned from the Board due to the fact that he had started to work for the CRA part-time. VI. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 6:45 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for May 1, 2001, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on June 5, 2002. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -4- HPB Minutes 5/01/02 • 4.1 r V AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: May 1, 2002 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • September 5, 2001 • September 19, 2001 • November 7, 2001 • November 14, 2002 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Management Systems, 8 NE 2"d Street, Old School Square Historic District, Jeffrey Silberstein, Authorized Agent. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a Class II site plan modification and landscape plan and associated with a proposed office building. B. 4 NE 2nd Street, Old School Square Historic District, Jeffrey Silberstein, Authorized Agent. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a non- contributing structure. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff V. ADJOURN HPB Meeting May 1, 2002 Page 2 �� � . ' ._��t ; Wendy Shay, Historic Presation Planner POSTED ON: April 25, 2002 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Agent: Jeffrey Silberstein, Silberstein Architects Project Name: Management Systems Project Location: Southwest corner of NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Street (Martin Luther King Jr. Drive). ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of COA-2002-038, which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Management Systems, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(b): • Class II Site Plan Modification; • Landscape Plan; and, • Reconsideration of a Condition of Site Plan Approval. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL The development proposal involves the following: • Modification of the previously approved parking area adjacent to the south side of the building to consist of three (3) standard, two (2) compact, and one (1) handicap accessible parking space (6 spaces total); and, • Landscape plan associated with the modified parking area and previously approved building. The development proposal also includes the reconsideration of the following condition of site plan approval: • That five feet (5') of right-of-way is dedicated along NE 1st Avenue. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The applicant submitted a modified site plan depicting changes to the parking area, as well as a landscape plan, which had not been previously reviewed by the Board. At its meeting of April 17, 2002, the HPB approved three (3) waivers associated with the proposed landscape plan and site plan modification. However, the actual site plan modification and landscape plan were tabled pending the applicants return to the Board for reconsideration on an original condition of approval pertaining to the dedication of five feet (5') of right-of-way for NE 1st Avenue. The Board gave instructions that the applicant should return on May 1, 2002 for a hearing on the reconsideration of the condition of approval, and that the site plan modification and landscape plan could return to the Board at the discretion of the applicant. The reconsideration of the condition of approval, and the approvals of the site plan modification and landscape plan are now before the Board for action. Additional background and a Meeting Date: May 1, 2002 Agenda Item: III.A. Historic Preservation Board Memorandum Staff Report Management Systems—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 2 complete analysis of the site plan modification can be found in the attached HPB staff report of April 17, 2002. The following relates to the landscape plan and reconsideration of the condition of approval regarding right-of-way dedication. Dedication of Right-of-Way: Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), and the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the required right-of-way width for NE 1st Avenue is 60'. Currently 40' of right-of-way exists for NE 1st Avenue. The Development Services Management Group (DSMG) and the City Engineer approved a right-of-way reduction for NE 1st Avenue to 50', thus requiring the dedication of five feet (5') of right-of-way. With the original site plan approval of February 20, 2002, a condition of approval was that the aforementioned right-of-way dedication occurs. Since that time, the applicant has requested that an easement be accepted in place of the dedication of the five feet (5') of right-of-way for NE 1st Avenue. The applicant's desire for providing the easement rather than dedicating additional right-of-way is based upon preventing "any future attempts by another individuals to litigate the approved setback variance" that was granted by the Board along with the original site plan approval in February (10' setback versus 15' setback). In this case, the major difference between the dedication of right-of-way and the proposed easement is that the building setback would be measured from the current property line, which with an easement (as opposed to the right-of-way dedication) would allow for the required 15' setback. This would negate the need for the variance altogether. The Land Development Regulations require the dedication of right-of-way to accommodate the necessary improvements associated with a street, such as roadway, sidewalks, drainage, on- street parking, and utilities. The procurement of easements is not the standard generally pursued by the City for the purpose of accommodating the public street system. The right-of- way dedication for this development (via deed) has been consistently applied to other developments along this section of NE 1st Avenue between NE 1st Street and NE 2"d Street (Currie Offices, DynaLife Offices, and Neal's Market Townhomes). Based upon the above, staff does not support the dedication of an easement in-lieu of a right-of-way dedication for NE 1st Avenue. The development as proposed can be accommodated via the approved variance request. Landscaping: At its meeting of April 17, 2002, the Board expressed concerns with the conditions of approval recommended by staff with respect to the replacement of the Alexander Palms and the relocation of the Live Oak trees. With regard to the Alexander Palms proposed within the northernmost landscape island adjacent to NE 1st Avenue, the City Horticulturist recommended that they be replaced with Pink Tabebuia so as to be consistent with the other landscape materials along NE 1st Avenue. An issue was raised with respect to sight visibility on another property under different circumstances, where there is a one-way street. However, there are no visibility concerns with respect to the Pink Tabebuia within the landscape node as NE 1st Avenue is a two-way street. Based upon the above, the replacement of the Alexander Palms with Pink Tabebuia will not create sight visibility issues and is attached as a condition of approval. Historic Preservation Board Memorandum Staff Report Management Systems—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 3 With regard to the Live Oak trees proposed along the southern and western perimeters of the property, the recommendation was to increase their spacing in order to accommodate mature tree canopies. The Live Oak trees as proposed would have a spacing of 19'-20', which would not provide adequate space for mature canopies to develop. Based upon the above, it is attached as a condition of approval that the proposed Live Oaks be relocated along the south and west perimeters so as to provide at least one (1) tree every 25'. It is noted that if the perimeter tree requirement is affected (reduced) by shifting the proposed tree locations along the south and west perimeters, the additional trees could be accommodated on the west side of the property, north of the parking lot. RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Site Plan Modification: Approve the COA and associated Class II site plan modification for Management Systems, based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. Address all Site Plan Technical Items listed in the attached HPB staff report of April 17, 2002, and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans; and, 2. That a light fixture be installed at the west end of the parking area. Landscape Plan: Approve the COA and associated landscape plan for Management Systems, based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following conditions: 1. Address all Landscape Plan Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans; 2. That the Live Oaks are planted so as to provide at least one (1) tree every 25'; and, 3. That the proposed Alexander Palms within the landscape island adjacent to NE 1st Avenue are replaced with a Pink Tabebuia. Reconsideration of a Condition of Approval: Deny the request to provide an easement in-lieu of the dedication of five feet (5') of right-of-way for NE 1st Avenue. Attachments: • HPB Staff Report of April 17, 2002 Staff Report Prepared by: Robert G. Tefft, Planner HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Agent: Jeffrey Silberstein, Silberstein Architects Project Name: Management Systems Project Location: Southwest corner of NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Street (Martin Luther King Jr. Drive). ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of COA-2002-038, which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Management Systems, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(b): • Class II Site Plan Modification; • Landscape Plan; and, • Waiver Requests. BACKGROUND The subject property incorporates Lot 9, less the west 60' thereof, and the north 26.5' of Lot 10, less the west 60' thereof, Block 67, Town of Linton. The property contains 0.167 acres and is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). At its meeting of December 5, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) approved a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a one-story single-family residence built in 1978, which was demolished in January of 2002. On February 20, 2002, HPB approved the construction of a two-story, 2,400 square foot office building with eight (8) associated parking spaces, and a variance request to reduce the required side street building setback from 15' to 10', subject to the following conditions: 1. That the height and dimensions of the proposed sign at the northeast corner of the property are provided on the site plan; 2. That the proposed landscape and engineering plans return to the Historic Preservation Board for approval; 3. That the three (3) in-lieu parking spaces are approved by the City Commission; 4. That a photometric plan in compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8 is provided; 5. That a bicycle rack is provided onsite; Meeting Date: April 17, 2002 Agenda Item: Ill. D. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Management Systems—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 2 6. That five feet (5') of right-of-way is dedicated along NE 1st Avenue; and, 7. That the proposed sidewalk along NE 1st Avenue is extended through the drive aisle. Subsequent to the HPB approval of February 20, 2002, a letter formally appealing the Board's decision was submitted. Rather than having the appeal brought before the City Commission, the applicant met with the appellant and staff to discuss a compromise. The discussion resulted in the elimination of an in-lieu parking space via the provision of an additional parking space onsite. The provision of this additional parking space does, however, create the need for waivers to be sought. The applicant has submitted a modified site plan depicting the proposed changes, as well as a landscape plan, which has not been previously approved by the Board. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL The development proposal involves the following: • Modification of the previously approved parking area adjacent to the south side of the building to consist of three (3) standard, two (2) compact, and one (1) handicap accessible parking space (6 spaces total); and, • Landscape plan associated with the modified parking area and previously approved building. The development proposal also includes waiver requests to the following sections of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDR): • A waiver request to reduce the required stacking distance along NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet-six inches (2'-6") [LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1)]; • A waiver request to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet (2') [LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a)]; and, • A waiver request to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent property to the west from five feet (5') to two feet (2') [LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d)]. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(b), a Class II site plan modification is a modification to a site plan which requires no review of the Performance Standards found in LDR Section 3.1.1, but requires action by a Board. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Management Systems—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 3 LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings): Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), formal findings are not required for a Class I or II modification. SITE PLAN MODIFICATION ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations (LDR) shall be specifically addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development proposal. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Matrix: Open Space: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), a minimum of 25% non-vehicular open space shall be provided with the development. The proposal provides 42% non-vehicular open space, which exceeds the requirement. LDR Section 4.4.24 Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD): Parking Requirements: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a), all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one (1) parking space per 300 square feet of total new floor area. Based upon the above, the proposed 2,400 square foot professional office building would require eight (8) parking spaces. LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(5), states that if it is impossible or inappropriate to provide the required parking on-site or off-site, the parking requirement may be met by providing an in-lieu parking fee of $6,000 per space [REF: Section 4.6.9(E)(3)(b)(3) — Area 3: Parcels located within the OSSHAD zoning district]. Due to site constraints the in-lieu fee option has been proposed for two (2) required parking spaces, which will cost a total of $12,000. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(E)(3)(e), in addition to in-lieu fees due, where adequate right-of-way exists adjacent to a proposed project the applicant must construct additional on-street parking and the total in-lieu fee due shall be reduced by an amount equal to the actual construction cost, but in no event to exceed the total in- lieu fees due. The previous approval provided for five (5) onsite parking spaces (4 standard, 1 handicap accessible) within the parking area on the south side of the property. The three (3) remaining required parking spaces were to be provided via an in-lieu parking agreement of which two (2) of the parking spaces would be constructed by the applicant within the NE 1st Avenue right-of-way. The proposed modification will increase the total Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Management Systems—Class I I Site Plan Modification Page 4 number of parking spaces available onsite to six (6) (3 standard, 2 compact, 1 handicap accessible). Thus, only two (2) parking spaces will now need to be provided via an in- lieu parking agreement and both of those spaces will be constructed by the applicant within the NE 1st Avenue right-of-way. The Parking Management Advisory Board (PMAB) previously recommended approval of a request for the purchase of the three (3) in-lieu parking spaces at its meeting of February 26, 2002. This request was subsequently approved by the City Commission at its meeting of March 5, 2002. As the number of in-lieu parking spaces being requested is decreasing with the site plan modification, the request it is not necessary that the request go before the City Commission a second time should the site plan modification be approved. Article 4.6 Supplemental District Regulations: Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.8, site lighting must be provided for new development proposals. With the proposed site plan modifications a decorative post mounted light at the southwest corner of the property has been eliminated. As a result, there is a concern that adequate lighting will not be achieved onsite. Accordingly, it is attached as a condition of approval that a light fixture be installed at the west end of the parking area and that a photometric plan in compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8 be provided. Off-Street Parking Regulations: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c), provisions must be made for stacking and transition of incoming traffic from a public street, such that traffic may not backup into the public street system. The minimum distance required between NE 1st Avenue and the first parking space within a parking lot containing 20 parking spaces or less is five feet (5'). The applicant has requested that a waiver to this requirement be granted to reduce stacking distance along NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet - six inches (2'-6"). The following is an analysis of that request: Waiver Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Management Systems—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 5 (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. While the provided stacking distance onsite is insufficient, there will be 15.5' from the parking space to the NE 1st Avenue travel lanes due to the provision of on-street parking between the travel lanes and the property. The provision of five feet (5') of stacking on local streets is primarily to take into account the five foot (5') wide perimeter landscape strip. Further, the 2,400 square foot office development will generate relatively low traffic volumes. Similar waivers have been granted for parking areas adjacent to alleyways. Granting the waiver will not have an adverse affect on the neighboring area, diminish the provision of public facilities, or create an unsafe situation. Further, given the conditions under which this waiver is being requested it is reasonable to believe that the waiver would be granted elsewhere under similar circumstances. Consequently, a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), can be made. Site Plan Technical Items: While revised plans have accommodated most of the staff concerns the following items remain outstanding, and must be addressed prior to building permit submittal: 1. That the previous conditions of site plan approval as discussed in the "Background" section of this report are addressed; 2. The height and dimensions of the proposed sign at the northeast corner of the property need to be provided on the site plan; and, 3. The air conditioning units located on the west side of the property should be relocated against the building rather than adjacent to the neighboring property. LANDSCAPE PLAN ANALYSIS The proposed landscape plan provides foundation landscaping consisting of Alexander, and Roebelenii Palms underplanted by Dwarf Chenille, Purple Queen, Shrimp Plant, Ti Plant, and Wart Fern. The perimeter landscaping consists of Live Oak trees underplanted with Ficus, and Red Tip Cocoplum hedging. Coconut Palms will be planted at the northeast corner of the property to accent a proposed free-standing sign, which will be underplanted with various annuals. Additionally, Alexander Palms and Pink Tabebuia will be installed within the landscape islands in the NE 1st Avenue right-of-way. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Management Systems—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 6 With respect to the aforementioned Live Oak trees, the spacing between the trees is only 19' — 20'. LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), requires that one (1) tree shall be planted every 30'. Therefore, it is attached as a condition of approval that the Live Oaks are planted at a rate of one (1) tree every 30'. With respect to the Alexander Palms that are to be installed with the northernmost landscape islands adjacent to NE 1st Avenue; in order to be consistent with the other landscape materials along NE 1st Avenue, the proposed palms should be replaced with a Pink Tabebuia. This has been attached as a condition of approval. Pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), the landscape buffer between the parking area and NE 1st Avenue is required to be five feet (5') in width and contain (1) tree. The proposal is to provide a two foot (2') wide landscape strip without the required tree. In addition, LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), requires that a landscape buffer of five feet (5') in width be provided between the vehicular use area and the adjacent property to the west. The applicant has requested that waivers be granted for these requirements. The following is an analysis of the waiver requests: Waiver Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. The waivers are requested to maximize the number of on-site parking spaces through the installation of an additional on-site parking space, this is the result of meetings with an adjacent property owner who opposed this development not providing all the required physical parking spaces. The proposed landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent right- of-way to the east side of the property is only two feet (2') in width. The width of the landscape island is capable of supporting the hedge that is required to screen the vehicular use area from the right-of-way, however the provision of the required tree within the landscape island is not feasible, as the tree would only have two feet (2') of soil in which to take root. Further, the provision of a tree within the landscape island Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Management Systems—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 7 would interfere with the Pink Tabebuia that is to be installed within the adjacent landscape node. The proposed landscape buffer adjacent to the vehicular use area on the west side of the property varies between two feet (2') and three feet (3') in width. The buffer, while deficient in size, will still contain the landscape materials necessary to screen the parking area from the adjacent property. In addition, a six foot high wood fence currently exists on the adjacent property to the west. Granting these waivers will not have an adverse affect on the neighboring area, diminish the provision of public facilities, or create an unsafe situation. Further, given the conditions under which the waivers are being requested it is reasonable to believe that the waiver would be granted elsewhere under similar circumstances. Consequently, a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), can be made. Landscape Plan Technical Items: While revised plans have accommodated most of the staff concerns the following items remain outstanding, and must be addressed prior to building permit submittal: 1. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(E)(1), xeriscape principals shall be utilized in landscape designs and installations. In small landscape areas adjacent to parking areas, ground cover shall be utilized instead of sod; 2. The proposed Red Tip Cocoplum hedge at the southeast corner of the property must be continued through the remainder of the landscape island so as to fully screen the adjacent vehicular use area; and, 3. The paver brick patio at the southwest corner of the building should be reconfigured so that additional landscape area is provided between the proposed hedge and the doorway to accommodate a required tree, and that the refuse containers are relocated to the north side of the doorway. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves the modification of a previously approved parking area to increase the number of parking spaces provided from five (5) to six (6). The modification will further serve to reduce to number of in-lieu spaces necessary to meet onsite parking requirements. The proposal will be consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Management Systems—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 8 B. Approve the COA, and the associated waiver requests, Class II site plan modification, and landscape plan for Management Systems, based upon positive findings with LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of COA-2002-038 and the associated waiver requests, Class II site plan modification, and landscape plan for Management Systems, based upon a failure to make positive findings with LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Waiver Requests: A. Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), to reduce the required stacking distance along NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5')to two feet- six inches (2'-6"), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5); B. Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet (2'), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5); and, C. Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent western property from five feet (5') to two feet (2'), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Site Plan: Approve the COA and associated Class II site plan modification for Management Systems, based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. Address all Site Plan Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans; and, 2. That a light fixture be installed at the west end of the parking area and that a photometric plan in compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8 is provided. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Management Systems—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 9 Landscape Plan: Approve the COA and associated landscape plan for Management Systems, based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following conditions: 1. Address all Landscape Plan Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans; 2. That the Live Oaks are planted at a rate of one (1) tree every 30'; and, 3. That the proposed Alexander Palms within the landscape island adjacent to NE 1st Avenue are replaced with a Pink Tabebuia. Attachments: • Site Plan • Landscape Plan Staff Report Prepared by: Robert G.Tefft, Planner Silberstein SITE STATISTICS A r c h I l e c l■ 1t.u1 fine 110..1 I DRI•a,:: llrr a, POaO IlOen MG: LLO SpT WIT - --\ - - — 101AL 1.0R 0.11, IMO Soft 33%01 So[ ... .1••0.:::.: PArRpv PAVED AREA, x.+.v Son 3n 01 311E N.C. 2tJ0 SJRECJ P..: MSN/I D SrKn rap' :[ 4m l:IJJ,Qrnu.I,.gI AI rA ppE1 °SOrt Oiip 1rt[L /.�Yd 1 � ! R W [MVO miaow,ha w.•Rr r�..n 10111 IOTA/PPA nr°SPPACESTPR01°iIPUE[ a ,.' �... I Mw ePro�WY rbR•. a.* T =1 SPACES rRORCtO a Mt a w e.,r.N wwn�..P M Lom IInKu vARRw srAcn Dn1 rr x I • REGULAR SPACES FRONDED 3 r C GG 0 I .k '^" 'M roC ACI Ms PM ...-- \ \ p y L r.r,1.M R..+r M, .01040•41 ruhro41 U.*of • ssEeArKs.tRvvvtD c ` �, 'f �� o`. � MANAGEMENT "p iD .�°" I �y o (()) SYSTEMS WORM 13'-0' SPItE1 IO tpLT u mI •-- eo !lila-' i )•t +' „ b n pKR.1 DELRAY BEACH,FL I MyPRS_IV2fl5 Irxis CE coil Iv1NY,tWtE_M1100es • 3 1I I I i „1 ` I � ILL17 • L L. 4 PI r Z [ � MIS I[YKIMc I STORY K.sn)[RCE I � Q I„ u . Z OuveLmscRv.KM 1 _ II ar:t}SPACE ; CI 101 I nSx TIT EST en TIES»r.rOr.0 MI RCMP © - L II .. I- MI Or ICI 10.IESS II[WEST Ea MT11110r01. W •- • - R- � E^I KOCK 67.10..Of r.N(NW MP.nACIIp AtOmr, I RECORDED RI Fur J 11 Il 1 3(SW.3).PurLIC MORO,Or PA.NACN COUNTY.MERE. - 1 ROF/,rKM y11 SiRwti D_iiLaDNrSDxs " c°o _°Inxrr.OCCUPANCY . t((y. J(-=--`-'—!e...E`� _ b TES 01 CnKTPU4101, • ''L - -•J.; _ TDSR D°A MpI } IfSETACK <=3 PROJECT LOCAT. - NCN 1 1II 11 tat. • i i Li__. .—f _ I --1 I — — ^ I F II.:':''''::::::::::..1... :: 1 _____ 1 i . -. IIe I . ,t VICINITY MAP I • lao SORE II...,V. f�r .'I__ MN FOOD lrrrcE , T T. UnTtrA•eo 1 a i s I REVISIONS —II If R.,P,m.I II �i,L,3ODx e NOVE►BER 8.2001 OOATION MAP e C�S E.Pre N-ALTERNATE 2 STORY SCHEME NVI �_ , OJ Dmwl by:DN GWdtedrtd amMrn.1 .,lna• .WWII H I LI • 41 LANDSCAPE DATA I .RROT L.OSCAAT DATA TOM Drt AKA L.per+1.r.) 11°'v JERRY TURNER ARA KC..." --- --------------- TDTKIITPW MEYJOHOWIT om n.r & ASSOCIATES mTAL nets nn,.eD a f.rs _ _-___ TmAt WIT.TRLf T*D.aD a nets INpQN[Md1llQIIIR • • • N.E. 2ND STREET 1 nncx<uwsawt DATA LMo MMU <2p in u.eT /h A MIAMI° M1YMO�fMfIL 00�� ToaAL1DT TO D;.00TKt.MT.TT S I m1Aa TIT' RP aN0SCAFC MLA WORLD ;M A ` PS IOTA RP. .~SCAM AKA MOWED ><> d TOTAL A}o V R4.eD VIAL an.PLOW. TRTt il0 RMDRIM ITDr VIAL Tien RDD'DD[D i teat �A trwar.>rnRD 1017 XV Cr ROL ,foam!70011121 1441779CArt RAIRD•LA KO.nl.a lA1OxM AKA NH!705 II i�p)T)yTIT�� WW2 C {[4 !'��,{+�IT.(yg {' ggy## 3+i• Moto MLA 110Tee0c KO a � 'a 'i[2?lt+�?1 # #I"�ilq /. s•kkel r<DL< ' .T+Dec. {� MTV nMT DATA C :`':� ,43, I` soarnaara• ryta wT11T MANAGEMENT �tr uLmuTVM w+wamc..x ® .D ® ���'' • roK `,a R1<.en }VMS SYSTEMS D )�%'!'_ 't • ItTAL DATna tcta Aun�m i VRS r• p DD • __ `,` `j1 �� I m+AL RTLRD VFW APO DAa•o COATf MIA m v © - • 7 . 0 PAW PALA 1"a> •D ® �i�;�;!,'j ® w 4'4 1 F y I w V - &' 1E I PLANTING NOTES: OD �00&Keil Ali 3,00:lwra 0..Vitr••1.�1f•1, .� r ''.LwA:�.`a....w.�Mommr7 Pm. .1 6 (7) '3 n ii, A , • , . . 1,,,,, .. ..] ta 1•47••••rimm.or Arr rm..14,7,74•447.447 44 TO*A :it:.i L . b w� 7I ...r I = • 1 '� ill N • F T..rire awTAw.U...•....T.r...•.... 1'1/14 /pl IA t °PI le I i V/ El ,0 Z TreL...V.•••r T.r.AM....1..n•714114.4 4•14711m 1:1MITY . �tl I�.::aee0 aewa .JOO,44.X /��� I :`'w.•,ppm pm.z..�5« �.�.": w'r 9![TO , I I 0; A , 1 I® PLANT LIST tir 1 1 © no RAH NW OTT M V R1WRtf 0•, I Ry' .� I 1N o..16.r.1 m r 1r Oh R44112 11 Q' • M. (}. Cba...T�Rs a Y a.1r [tyL'`O C �• !� T R e..nc TA ... S It A� Lye ll«. Pu DA[bfD� f [.MTng t I RD*$�'pt/- n R tv.� ao r r arr u.+ •dl dl IT I rap a }�- L..T 1u. n' T.wTr,. .n. c ,1 • 00000000p0000000.oet gw oo a r " Landscape t1 ' Plan r II II �� .raK -A.M_ 6 'rat 1a SJJI L- 1 of 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: May 1, 2002 AGENDA ITEM: Ill. B. ITEM: 4 NE 2'd Street, Old School Square Historic District— Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a non-contributing structure. CASON — METHODIST — — CHURCH GENERAL DATA: i Owner Deborah Reilly Applicant/Agent . Jeffrey Silberstein Location Southwest Corner of N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST.— Northeast 1st Avenue and ``' N Northeast 2nd Street. Property Size 0.226 Acres _ Z Future Land Use Map OMU (Other Mixed Use) Current Zoning OSHAAD (Old School o Square Historic Arts District) adjacent Zoning North: OSHAAD (Old School I I W Square Historic Arts District) N.W. 2ND ST. N.E. 2ND z ST. East: OSHAAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) South: OSHAAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) West: OSHAAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) Existing Land Use Residential - Proposed Land Use Demolition of existing C structure. N.W. 1ST ST. Z N.E. 1ST ST. Water Service Connection available via a 6" - water main located within Z Northeast 2nd Street. — Z Z Sewer Service Connection available via an 8" sewer main located within the north/south alleyway of OLD 1 SCHOOL 111 Block 67. SQUARE • ATLANTIC A V E I ci z _N _W viiimief • III. B. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Agent: Jeffrey Silberstein Project Name: 4 NE 2nd Street ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of a non-contributing single family home in the Old School Square Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6 (J). BACKGROUND The subject property is located on the south side of NE 2nd Street, approximately 71' west of NE 1st Avenue, and is zoned Old School Square Historic District (OSSHAD). The 0.14 acre property consists of a portion of Lots 9 & 10, Block 67, Town of Delray, and contains an 800 square foot non-contributing single family building constructed in 1937. In June 1989, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved the installation of a 4' picket fence along the front façade of the structure and a swing gate in front of the driveway. During its meeting on March 4, 1998, the HPB reviewed a request to retain the existing paint colors of bright pink for the body and bright blue on the trim and front door. The house was painted without the application and approval of a COA. Staff recommendation was to change the trim to white and perhaps retain the blue on the door. The Board voted to continue this item until possible Bootstrap funds could become available for use by the applicant as no additional appropriations were available for re- painting, however, no change to the color scheme was ever applied. The current proposal is to demolish the existing structure in anticipation of redevelopment of the property. ANALYSIS Currently a residence, the wood frame structure displays little of its original architectural details as the wood frame exterior has been stuccoed over and a stone finish has been applied to the front façade. There have been several additions/enclosures and interior alterations to the floor plan as well as the replacement of the original fenestration with aluminum framed jalousie and awning windows found throughout the house. The house does retain its wood floors and bead board detailing in the interior. Despite its age, over fifty years old for consideration as a historic structure, the building is classified as non- Demolition-4 NE 2nd Street Page 2 contributing to the historic district due to the severity of the alterations to the historic fabric and its lack of architectural and/or historical significance. Upon visual inspection of the structure, it was noted that there is a considerable amount of wood rot and bowing on the wood floors and ceiling. Substantial frass due to termite damage was apparent upon inspection of the interior attic space. The proposal is to demolish the existing structure to accommodate the construction of a new office/retail building on the property. Prior to purchasing the property, the buyer would like some assurance that the house may be demolished. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, a site plan application should be submitted for the proposed building and approved by the Board. This will delay demolition of the structure and ensure that the solids to voids pattern along NE 2nd Street will remain until construction is intended to begin. LDR Section 4.5.1(F) "Restrictions on Demolitions" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness' for demolition. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill criteria for designation for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. The non-contributing structure is not eligible for individual listing in the Local Register or the National Register of Historic Places due to its lack of historical and/or architectural significance and the substantial alterations to the historic materials in relation to the context of the surrounding historic district. Likewise, there is significant physical deterioration of the historic fabric. In order to retain the current solids to voids pattern, the demolition should be delayed until a site plan is reviewed and approved by the Board. This has been attached as a condition of approval. Due to the factors presented Demolition-4 NE 2nd Street Page 3 in this report, positive finding can be made with respect to LDR 4.5.1 (F) regarding the demolition of the non-contributing structure. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve as presented. 3. Approve, with a delay of three months. RECOMMENDATION Based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F) approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the non-contributing dwelling at 4 NE 2nd Street with the following condition: 1) That a site plan for any new development on the property be submitted and approved by the Board prior to the issuance of a demolition permit. Report prepared by:Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner POST CASON OFFICE S METHODIST CHURCH w Li a a a > N W. 3RD ST. N.E• 3RD ST. i N.E. 3RD ST. Lv 0ill ' Q Q > Z w } - I CITY o — ATTORNEY Q o in o BUILDING I - Z 1 ct M J d a MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE (N.W. 2ND ST.) z N.E. 2ND ST. o a 'ME N N W I Q Z Q • z CITY I� HALL ci ti i I`` N.W. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST.O N.E. 1ST / ST. I COMMUNITY Z w wlir z CENTER Z z (r 111 TENNIS OLD STADIUM SCHOOL Li C SQUARE I I z = T ATLAN TI C lr AVEN U E POLICE SOUTH QI lal > W I Li a COMPLEX COURT COUNTY w Q HOUSE r 1!1 ——a zMEIMII cn o N 0 Z Mil NM N Uj CA N In N 1 4 N.E. 2ND STREET REILLY OFFICE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL 1 - AREA OF MODIFICATION PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM603 THE NORTH 263 FEET OF THE WEST 60 FE'r.'1 OT 10, 4 N.E.2ND STREET • AND THE WEST 60 FEET OF LOT 9,BL I r 1 'P4 111 '11 P DEGRAY BEACH',I L ��p fir,•����E�'>!�L - ----- --.1 DELRAY, FORMERLY �� 1401I ao KNOWN AS LINTON 1 N hD really PAIL etteAfrf. 60.00'• ° According to the plat recorded in Plat Book 1,Page 3, recorded in the public t8 6yo�-' (, s7o _-- -- +t !\1----.�_ records of Palm Beach County,Florida;said land situate,lying, and being in 73e i 1 • I 7 V -� — 11 i' I Palm Beach County,Florida. pa- — j M1 .I�7,G. �No ., Liz_ it • b' m' �.� I I o,s I I � 1� : :� N � i- ' _I_I__f__4 Wt ' - N . .- a > ' �a a 3 ¢ a o ST �Q sic a 3 I a n � � Z � ` � t- all- 0 I � M Q fT NC Z ' t 'G0T 9 BLOCK 67 -- -- LUIIIGII KIT1L City 3 BLS' ro In\ L r�III — 3 I° N a Z -Pig y zl N o > I / I C �, 17r�� Z 1 Cm nnunily lCcntcr SST NE 5111 R. .'W'P' „A. 9.0 R..; - �9 z 17 3 sl Tennis Ctr �li( o cz I r Z Z z :Fire 3 Z choulw rtswii O - O I A Iti• Dcptrz 9uarF Z 3 I NORTH Ki •• Or, M • ( w T w Iw. J w w poice , H • o �(i�L♦% = Z� a a a a a QI■sou.9 a c a t Ci1C� Not to Scale ' 2q I NO BELOW GROUND IMPROVEMENTS,FOOTERS, 1 ST De t PDeacl, _� SE •1 I L('- FOUNDATIONS OR UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED Q1 °D '� w county '� w w Vicinity k t.'iJe / '• j OR SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. _ _ Covitho4s •�._r'_� �_�_T_ Map P P.C.P.=permananent control point PK=pk nail P.C.P.=permanent control point CM=concrete monument Dr 1 -- -. h I Tran.=transformer pad P=plat R/W=right-of-way �9=power pole M=measured / • u I.R.=iron rod R=radius =central angle P.O.B.=point of beginning U/E=utility easement ! I.P.=iron pipe L=arc length CL=centerline P.C.=point of curvature Q=bearing basis line Asph=asphalt Esmt=easement Cone=concrete P.O.C.=point of commencement 0/S=offset RP=radius point Typ=typical P-I.=point of intersection WPF=wood privacy fence CLF=chain link fence ® P.T.=point of tangency P.R.C.=point of reverse curve P.P.M.=permanent reference monument D/E=drainage easement • N { l i /• I Certified To: Lo j J o l', 1.1Z E c, �.- .�Ohll E?CIIIICI- atroS rl:IG, • l Uj tlo]i I f 1 S.E,41h Ave.,Saito 211CYNTHIA M.STAHL Jt1JJl ('1is;__ _ Delray Beach,FL 33483 I I—� —�� CTX MORTGAGE COMPANY • \ eh i / o,y Phone 407-243-462469 f.,{) f / I Fax 243-4869 Ifs'Successors and/or Assigns ,h0 �rA1k a7sv a Land West Palm 735-7639 GULFATLANTIC TITLE AGENCY,INC. gd � 1 furveyot West Palm Fax 735-7641 60.00' Toll Free 1.600-773.5531 NATIONS TITLE INSURANCE OF NEW YORK,INC. Fax Free 1-800-954-4408 / I Prepared By:Absolute Land Surveying,Inc. (407)27e-6377 Flood Zone: II�( I. I SE 4th Avenue 9205•Delray Beach,FL 334e3 Map No: I pp 10p OOOq p LOT 10 BLOCK 67 I hereby certify that the Sketch of Boundary Survey shown hereon meets the minimum technical standards set forth In Chapter 61G17.6,Florida Administrative Code pursuant to Map Date: I" C- e Section 472.027,Florida Statutes. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown hereon ore Not valid unless be. don the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929,and bearings are based on plat. r I r Dale: 9-Z 1-9 5 sealed with embossed — —� } L/����J�;I.'� Job No: cj-?j28 surveyor'ssoel ,,,!ll���" �'��� �� }j yarry A.Burgess I{ P.L.S.No.5089 Revised: FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT —,ST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: ELLIOTT, GLORIA MAILING ADDRESS [X]CITY []COUNTY []OTHER LOCAL AGENCY []STATE 345 SOUTH SWINTON AVENUE CITY COUNTY Delray Beach, FL 33444 Palm Beach DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY MAY 1,2002 NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, City of Delray Beach OR COMMITTEE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD (HPB) ITEM III.B., CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS,4 NE 2ND STREET WHO MUST FILE FORM 4 This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers,this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is described for all other boards, i.e.those at the state level. IhI RT C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed. PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.1343(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes)by whom he is retained. In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: (a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is abstaining from voting; and (b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below. NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting. In such cases, however,the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made. I,the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on MAY, 1,2002: (a) bstained from voting on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain;or inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retained. r The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in th asure is as follows: MAY 1, 2002 Date Filed Sig ture Please see PART C for instructions on when and where file this form. PART B VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom is retained is required to disclose the nature of is interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs. I,the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclosure that on , 19 . (a) I voted on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of _ , by whom I am retained. (b) The measure on which I voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Date Filed Signature Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15)days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. this form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 11.317(1983), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES 3ROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE ORE MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED$5,000. 5/15/02 o'. 0 r �4Y AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: May 15, 2002 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. The MAY 15, 2002 Historic Preservation Board's Regular Meeting has been CANCELED. The next Regular Meeting of the Historic Preservation Board is June 5, 2002. Wendy Shay Historic Preservation Planner Posted on May 8, 2002