Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
HPB-06-19-02
6/19/UZ MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: June 19, 2002 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott, Donnamarie Sloan, James Keavney, William Branning, Rhonda Sexton MEMBER ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, and Loretta Heussi, Brian Shutt II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Branning made the motion to amend the agenda to remove the approval of the minutes of October 3, 2001 due to the fact that they were not ready for review. Ms. Lee-McDermott seconded and the motion passed 7- 0. The Minutes for the Regular Meetings of October 17, 2001 and April 17, 2002 were before the Board for consideration. Ms. McDermott moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 6-0- 1 with Mr. Branning abstaining (he was not on the Board at that time). III. PUBLIC HEARING: A. O'Neal House, 910 NE 2nd Avenue, Starr Brigante, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is to recommend to the City Commission, the listing of the 910 NE 2nd Avenue as an Individually Listed Property in the Local Register of Historic Places, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C). Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report. The floor was then opened up for public discussion. Scott Christian spoke on behalf of the Seacrest Neighborhood and was in support of the historic designation. Russell Green (previous owner) also spoke in favor of the designation. After Board discussion, it was moved by Ms. Elliott, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to recommend approval to the City Commission that the residence and associated property at 910 NE 2nd Avenue be listed in the Local Register of Historic Places, less the 25' of lot 27 based upon positive findings, with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1 (B)(2)(a) & 4.5.1(B)(3)(a) and (b). Jim Keavney stepped down. B. Fontaine Fox Historic Site, 615 N. Ocean Boulevard, Individually Designated Property, Richard Edick and Georganne Goldblum, Owners, Jim Keavney, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is recommend to the City Commission approval of an amendment to Ordinance 70-89 that established the Fontaine Fox House Historic Site Designation to allow the enclosure of a 250 ft. porch and a COA request for the installation of new impact resistant windows and doors and a spiral staircase, pursuant to LDR Sections 4.5.1(B), 4.5.1 (E), and 4.5.1(K)(2). Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report and presented letters from neighbor's supporting the request. Richard Edick addressed the Board to further explain the renovations to the building. Jim Keavney spoke to the Board and reminded them that this was a rather new dwelling (constructed in 1992) with no historic value. The new spiral staircase on the front façade will be behind the heavily landscaped yard and therefore not visible from the right-of-way. It was noted by Mr. Edick and staff that the previous owner had attempted to enclose the porch through the amendment of Ordinance 70-89 and the 2,400 sq. ft restriction. However, the request was denied at the City Commission level due to the adjacent (northern) neighbor's objections. As there are no objections by the current neighbors and considering the footprint of the building was not going to be altered as previously suggested there should be no such conflict with this project. Ms. Jamison then read into record letters of support of the project submitted by neighbors Paul Cusson and Monty Helm. She then closed the public hearing and turned the floor over to the Board. It was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0-1 (Jim Keavney abstaining) to recommend approval to the City Commission to amend Ordinance #70-89 for the dwelling at 615 N. Ocean Boulevard, the Fontaine Fox House Historic Site, based on positive -2- HPB Minutes 06/19/02 findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(B), (E)(7), (E)(8), (E)(8)(c), (E)(8)(f), and (E)(8)(j) and LDR 4.5.1(K)(2), the Design Guidelines, Objective C-1 of the Coastal Management Element in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. It was then moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 6-0-1 (Keavney abstaining) to approve 2002-204-COA for the installation of impact resistant windows and doors and a spiral staircase at 615 N. Ocean Blvd, the Fontaine Fox House Historic Site, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(B), (E)(7), (E)(8), (E)(8)(c), (E)(8)(f), and (E)(8)(j) and LDR 4.5.1(K)(2), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, Objective C-1 of the Coastal Management Element in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. At this point in the meeting, Jim Keavney returned to the Board. C. Susan Williams House, 154 NW 5th Avenue, Individually Designated Property, City of Delray Beach, Owner. Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is recommend the approval to the City Commission to amend Ordinance 9-95 to replace the property description and address from 30 NW 3rd Avenue to 154 NW 5th Avenue. The individual historic designation will remain. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report. Diane Dominguez, Director of the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) was in attendance to address any Board questions. Ms. Jamison opened the floor for public comments; none were made. It was moved by Ms. Sloan, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to recommend to the City Commission approval of the amendment to Ordinance 9-95 to alter the property description and address based on positive findings affecting 154 NW 5th Avenue, Susan Williams House based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (B) and (K)(2) and the Design Guidelines. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Anchorage Condo Building, 60 Marine Way, Marina Historic District, John DeNiro, Owner. -3- HPB Minutes 06/19/02 Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is the consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the addition of awnings on south and east elevations of the building. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report. It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Mr. Keavney and passed 7-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness request to install new awnings on the south and east façades of the contributing structure, Anchorage Condo Building, 60 Marine Way, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), subject to the following condition: 1) That the new awnings have the same scalloped edge as the existing lower awnings. B. Masonic Lodge, 40-44 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Michael Weiner, Authorized Agent Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the design elements associated with a Class I site plan modification for the alteration of the north and east elevations of the Masonic Building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report. There was considerable Board discussion regarding the original "historic" look of the building. Ms. Shay supported the Staff position that a window wall be installed rather than fixed doors (as the proposed previous plan showed the installation of retractable doors). If the new doors were to be fixed, then a window wall to match the existing walls should be installed. Michael Weiner then addressed the Board, representing the owner, explaining the reasoning behind the changes to the building. The Board then continued with extensive discussion of the proposal. It was moved by Mr. Branning and seconded by Mr. Keavney to approved 4-3 to approve the COA-465 for the associated elevation changes to the Masonic Lodge, with the following conditions: 1) That the stucco exterior at the base of the windows on the north elevation be retained and that fixed windows be installed to mirror the window wall west of the proposed door system. -4- HPB Minutes 06/19/02 V. REPORT AND COMMENTS: A. Public Comments No Public Comments B. Report from Historic District Representatives No Reports C. Board Members Ms. Jamison inquired about the sidewalk requirements on the Fine Building. Ms. Shay assured the Chair that she would look into the issue and report back at the next Board meeting. D. Staff Brian Shutt, Assistant City Attorney, addressed the Board discussing "Quasi-Judicial Hearings" and the Rules and Regulations for the City of Delray Beach Historic Preservation Board. Ms. Shay mentioned to the Board that she had been discussing a system to expedite procedures when processing waivers or variances regarding historic buildings in need of re-location due to the danger of being razed. Ms. Shay informed everyone that she is moving forward with a PSIQ for the listing of the Spady House in the National Register of Historic Places. VI. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:30 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for June 19, 2002, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on August 7, 2002. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -5- HPB Minutes 06/19/02 v<_ c=+ 1p4 y g• AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: June 19, 2002 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • October 3, 2001 • October 17, 2001 • April 17, 2002 III. PUBLIC HEARING A. O'Neal House, 910 NE 2"d Avenue, Starr Brigante, Authorized Agent. Recommendation to the City Commission of the Historic Designation for a c. 1926 Mediterranean-Revival house for listing in the Local Register of Historic Places. B. 615 N. Ocean Boulevard, Individually Designated Property, Richard Edick and Georganne Goldblum, Owner. Consider an amendment to Ordinance 70-89 to increase the maximum floor area from 2,400 sq.ft. to 2,650 sq. ft. for the enclosure of a 250 sq. ft. porch and a COA for the installation of windows and an exterior spiral staircase. C. Susan Williams House, 154 NW 5th Avenue, Individually Designated Property, City of Delray Beach, Owner. Consider an amendment to Ordinance 9-95 for the modification of the property description and address. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Anchorage Condo Building, 60 Marine Way, Marina Historic District, John DeNiro, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of awnings on a contributing apartment building. HPB Meeting June 19, 2002 Page 2 B. Masonic Building, 40-44 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Michael Weiner, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I site plan modification for design element changes. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff VI. ADJOURN Ur\C14 NUJ ;- Wendy Shay, Hisric Preserv6fion Planner POSTED ON: June 14, 2002 FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS T NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD.COUNCIL.COMMISSION.AUTHORITY.OR COMMITTEE KEAVNEY, JAMES HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD.COUNCIL.COMMISSION.AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON 2934 SOUTHWEST 22ND CIRCLE WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: CITY COUNTY 2 CITY O COUNTY 0 OTHER LOCAL AGENCY DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PALM BEACH NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED CITY OF DELRAY BEACH MY POSITION IS: JUNE 19, 2002 _ G ELECTIVE XI APPOINTIVE ITEM III.B. PUBLIC HEARING, 615 NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by any person serving at the county,city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143,Florida Statute. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which Aes to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea- which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained);to the special private gain or loss of a relative;or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A"business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner,joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder(where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above,you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting;and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting,who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. OU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE EN: • You must complete and file this form(before making any attempt to influence the decision)with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side) CE FORM 86-EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 1 l _ APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes.A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. II DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, I A4M.�� `�•�''y l ,hereby disclose that on ,_)v auk (CJ ,20 O : (a)A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or loss; • inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, • inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, 4- inured to the special gain or loss of ,�t4P. -a !✓pt _ by whom I am retained;or inured to the special gain or loss of ,which is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b)The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: lz_tc„i.Lbtazt) GrJ �K Q ��L1 6 (LC 134v rJ «-of Lu M v W N�125 or -n-Fe 'T C915 J. Q7ry t3L�rta.�i Aza -ri-t� c-Ll, 7s yU.1 !k2<=0(�r;L-CU IzeL f=(12 M . a_ Arri 6L Urvq') S7 pp D T�wN riza`vi Tt4e �-Ef5 bf?--t F 2V��, �7to", Y�a�2(J. cal Nev T l-l-Z ram. rzejt Arc \iQ& u ZI ) --L Date Filed Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED S10,000. CE FORM BB-EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2 • MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: October 17, 2001 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gail-Lee McDermott, Mike Simon, Donnamarie Sloan, Marylou Jamison, Rhonda Sexton, Gloria Elliott, Dave Bodker STAFF PRESENT: Ellen Uguccioni II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 487 — 330 S.E 7th Avenue, Mr. M. Popper and Ms. M. Barnett, Owners —A Non-Contributing Structure in the Marina Historic District Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is an elevation change to the building and color change. Ms. Uguccioni presented the item to the Board through a review of the staff report. An addition to an existing wall and a color change has been proposed as follows: A 14 ft. extension of a wall on the east side of the structure is proposed. The existing windows will be removed during construction and will be re-installed with the new construction. The current color of building is lime green. Proposed change will be tan with white trim, however, the owners are not committed to the proposed color change. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. McDermott, and passed 7- 0 to approve COA 487 to allow the new wall to be constructed, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) and the design guidelines. The owners and the Board agreed to table the color change until the next meeting. III. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None I B. BOARD MEMBERS None C. STAFF None IV. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 6:15 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for October 17, 2001, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on June 19, 2002. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -2- HPB Minutes 11/1/00 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: APRIL 17, 2002 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 6:05 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott, Rhonda Sexton, Jim Keavney MEMBERS ABSENT: Michael Simon, DonnaMarie Sloan STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Debra Garcia II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: No minutes were available for approval. Staff assured the Board that the minutes will be brought in for review at the next meeting. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. 30 SE 1st Avenue, contributing structure in the Old School Square Historic District, Michael Strauss, Owner. Action Before the Board: Re-Consideration of a COA request for the installation of 6/1 and 4/1 aluminum windows on a contributing structure (continued from the March 20, 2002 meeting and the April 3, 2002 meeting) Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through review of the staff report. During the meeting of March 20, 2002, the Board reconsidered the installation of aluminum, framed 6/1 and 4/1 windows in the 1925 Mission style house. Documentation was provided indicating that the installation of the previously approved solid wood windows would be cost prohibitive for the applicant. Alternatives were recommended by the Board that included researching the cost of installing vinyl clad wood core windows along the front façade of the structure with aluminum framed windows on the remainder of the elevations, not viewed from the right-of-way. Further, the Board recommended the applicant research additional funding sources such as the Delray Beach CRA loan program and possible Community Development grants. The item went before the Board for re-consideration at its April 3rd meeting, however, the applicant was not present. Therefore, the Board continued the item to the April 17, 2002 meeting. It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 5-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness request to remove the existing jalousie and awning windows and install new 6/1 and 4/1 single hung sash windows for the contributing structure at 30 SE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(c) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines with the following condition: 1) Install 6/1 and 4/1 SHS, wood core windows with vinyl cladding on the front (east) elevation (seen from the right-of-way) and install aluminum frame 6/1 and 4/1, SHS windows on the north, south, and west elevations. B. Balinesian Spa & Wellness Center, 5 NE 2nd Street, contributing structure in the Old School Square Historic District, Claudio Camilucci, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a standing sign associated with a Class I site plan modification for the Balinesian Spa & Wellness Center, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Shay presented the item. The applicant proposes the installation of a free standing, hanging sign. The proposed sign will be constructed of polyurethane painted to mimic the appearance of wood and will reflect an Asian theme with a bamboo frame surrounding the text of the sign. The stand will be painted dark green and the sign will be painted maroon with gold copy and black shadowing to highlight the text (all caps). The standing sign measures 78" (6.5') in height and 48" (4') in width with 4"x6" posts. Eye hooks will be used to attach the sign to the post. The sign will be installed diagonally approximately 12' from the Swinton Avenue and 17' from NE 2nd Street. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign for the Balinesian Spa & Wellness Center, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7. (G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b) and (H)(2)(a-c) and the City's Design Guidelines. -2- HPB Minutes 4/17/02 C. Sundy Harvest, Old School Square Historic District, south side of SE 1st Street between S. Swinton Avenue and SE 1st Avenue, Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for the Sundy Harvest, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): The proposal is approval of a Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Demolition of a noncontributing building and a wavier request A single-family residence at 6 SE 1st Street built in 1912 occupied the corner (Lots 20 and 21). Because of its deteriorated condition, the Historic Preservation Board approved the demolition of the house, conditioned on the requirement that the house not be demolished until a site plan was approved for all three lots (Lots 20-22). That site plan proposed the construction of a parking lot on Lots 20 and 21 and the rehabilitation and conversion of the residence at 10 SE 1st Street (Lot 22) to a commercial use. The 1,373 square foot structure required five (5)-parking spaces. Twenty (20) spaces were actually provided on Lots 20 and 21 to help accommodate the required parking for the future conversion of the residential properties located to the north. During its meeting on February 20, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a Class V site plan that included the conversion of a contributing structure from residential to commercial and the demolition of two non- contributing structures in order to accommodate a parking area. Upon further evaluation, the Board determined that the demolition of the non- contributing structure, located on SE 1st Street, would be detrimental to the area and would not be consistent with the Delray Beach Downtown Master Plan or the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. The Board requested that the item be tabled and a revised plan be brought back before the HPB at a later date. It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Mr. Keavney based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1) and passed 5-0 to approve the demolition of the non-contributing building located on Lots 24 & 25 of the subject property. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Elliott based upon positive findings in the report to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5) and passed 5-0, to approve the waiver to LDR Section 4.6.9 (D)(3)(c) to reduce the stacking distance from 20' to 15' along SE 1st Avenue. -3- HPB Minutes 4/17/02 It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Mr. Keavney and passed 5-0 to approve the COA for the Class V site plan for the Sundy Harvest Properties, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) and (Findings) and Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That a Declaration of Unity of Title must be recorded for lots 20-25, Block 70, Town of Delray, or cross-parking and access easement recorded, prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) That a bike rack be placed on site. 4) That decorative site lighting fixture details are provided and that the light locations be indicated on the site and landscape plans. 5) That the site plan must be revised to show the relocation of the utilities underground. 6) Back-out parking onto an alley must be 10' wide and 42' in depth measured from the paved alley to the head of the parking space. 7) That the handicapped accessible parking space be centrally located between the buildings being converted and a sidewalk provided to the entrance to comply with the Florida building Code for Building Construction. 8) That a right-of-way deed be executed and recorded, dedicating 5' of right-of-way along SE 1st Avenue. John Szerdi, representing Dharma Construction addressed the Board concerning a walkway that is located between the buildings on the East side. He requested that the walkway be optional and to allow the tenant to decide whether the walkway would remain. After much Board discussion, the motion was modified to allow the applicant the discretion whether to allow the walkway to remain. Modified motion passed 5— 0 . -4- HPB Minutes 4/17/02 It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Mr. Keavney, and passed 5-0 to approve the COA for the landscape plan for the Sundy Harvest Properties, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following condition: 1) That all proposed landscaping that will interfere with the line of site of the front façade from the right-of-way be replaced or relocated or trimmed D. Management Systems, 8 NE 2nd Street, Old School Square Historic District, Jeffrey Silberstein, Authorized Agent. Action Before The Board: The action before the Board is a COA request, which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Management Systems, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(b): Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through review of the staff report. The proposal consists of a Class II Site Plan Modification, Landscape plan and a Waiver requests. Subsequent to the HPB approval of February 20, 2002, a letter formally appealing the Board's decision was submitted. Rather than having the appeal brought before the City Commission, the applicant met with the appellant and staff to discuss a compromise. The discussion resulted in the elimination of an in-lieu parking space via the provision of an additional parking space onsite. The provision of this additional parking space does, however, create the need for waivers to be sought. The applicant has submitted a modified site plan depicting the proposed changes, as well as a landscape plan, which has not been previously approved by the Board. Roger Saberson, Legal Council for the applicant, addressed the Board requesting that the 5' right-of-way dedication requirement be replaced by a 5' permanent easement. Allowing the applicant to remain as the owner of the five feet and hopefully eliminating further potential waivers to the property in the future. Jeffery Silberstein, Authorized Agent also had questions pertaining to landscaping issues and the striping of the parking area. The handicapped striping was recommended by staff to extend all the way across the drive aisle and Mr. Silberstein felt that this was unsightly and unnecessary. The number of the trees recommended by staff was less than the number that the agent had proposed, and questions were addressed to the Board as to why this had been recommended. After much Board consideration and discussion, Ms. McDermott made the motion, seconded by Ms. Elliott, and passed 5-0, the following: -5- HPB Minutes 4/17/02 a) The waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), to reduce the required stacking distance along NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet-six inches (2'-6"), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5); b) The waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and NE 1st Avenue from five feet (5') to two feet (2'), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5); and, c) The waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), to reduce the required landscape buffer between the vehicular use area and the adjacent western property from five feet (5') to two feet (2'), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Mr. Keavney, and passed 5-0 to table all other Management Systems issues concerning the right-of-way dedication, the striping issue and the landscaping plans to a future date. E. Winston Condos, 137 S. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Brain Russo, Authorized Agent. Action Before The Board: The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the design elements associated with a Class I site plan modification for the installation of windows, hurricane shutters, and a standing seam metal roof pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Wendy Shay presented the item to the Board through a review of the staff report. The subject property consists of the Winston Condominium Building (formerly lots 7 & 8, Block 70, Town of Delray). The property contains 0.30 acres and a non-contributing, masonry vernacular building constructed in 1980 as an eight unit apartment building. The property is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). The most recent Board action which relates to this property occurred at the HPB meeting of September 5, 2001 where a COA and associated Class IV site plan modification, landscape plan, and design elements was approved for the conversion of the multi-family structure to a two-story office building. The project was never undertaken. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Elliott, and passed 5-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for elevation changes to a non-contributing building associated with a Class I Site Plan Modification for 137 South Swinton Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines with the following conditions: -6- HPB Minutes 4/17/02 1) That the originally proposed tile inlay be included in the current façade improvements on the all elevations. 2) Add banding as shown on the originally approved plans around the windows on the West elevation. 3) That the Landscaping Plan return before the Board for approval. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: There were no comments from the public. B. Reports from Historic District Representatives: No Representatives were present to report to the Board. C. Board Member: Ms. Jamison asked staff concerning a tree house that has been constructed at the Frank McKinney property. Ms. Shay assured the Board that Mr. McKinney has submitted for a COA approved but has not submitted the required photos and site plan/survey. Ms. Shay stated that she would contact Mr. McKinney concerning this matter in mid-May if she does not received a response soon. Ms. Jamison inquired about the updating design guidelines. Ms. Shay stated that a consultant has been selected and is to be approved by City Commission at the May 7th meeting. Mr. Keavney commented that he could not hear some of the applicants. Ms. Shay mentioned that there isn't an amplifying devise in the conference room but that the Board can certainly request the applicant to "speak-up". D. Staff: Ms. Shay presented the Board with all the entries of the Poster Contest for Preservation Week. Paola Sanchez was selected as the 1st place winner. Michael Santorsola was selected as 2nd place and AJ Rosenthal was selected for 3rd place. The award ceremony is scheduled for the May 7th City Commission Meeting. VII. ADJOURNMENT: -7- HPB Minutes 4/17/02 There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:10 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for April 17, 2002, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on June 19, 2002. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -8- HPB Minutes 4/17/02 �e. ~► HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: June 19, 2002 AGENDA ITEM: - Ill. c. ITEM: Susan Williams House, 154 NW 5th Avenue— Consider an amendment to Ordinance 9-95 for the modification of the property description and address. I l I __ i GENERAL DATA: Owner/Applicant City of Delray Beach - -- Agent n/a H.W1-1 -- 3R° —ST. Location West side of Northwest 5th _ 1 i I Avenue, approximately 260' south of Martin Luther King I I Jr. Drive. Property Size 0.15 Acres I I _ ture Land Use Map GC (General Commercial) I .I 1p il urrent Zoning GC (General Commercial) N W 2ND ST. rd MARTIN . LUTHER KING JR. DR._ djacent Zoning North: GC (General Commercial) ! 1111 _ East: CF (Community Facilities) II1111 M. % South: CF (Community Facilities) West: R-1-A (Single Family •-:WTI i ii Residential) Imei NI Pxictinn Land Use Vacant 1 a N W _1$ ST. • 1 Proposed Land Use Modification of the property I I description and address. 3 Water Service Connection available via a 6" _ I z I 1 water main located within - FIRE STATION Northwest 5th Avenue. __ Sewer Service Connection available via an I I 8" sewer main located within ATLANTIC AVENUE Northwest 5th Avenue. IIIII POLICE 1 . - COMPLEX svr_ tST ST. 3 = 3 I Vi N N 3 It I— I_1 t "'.C. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Item: II. A. - Meeting of June 19, 2002 Consideration of an amendment to Ordinance 9-95 regarding the Susan Williams House historic designation. Location: 154 NW 5th Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of an amendment to Ordinance 9-95 for the Susan Williams House historic designation, pursuant to LDR Sections 4.5.1(B) and 4.5.1(K)(2). BACKGROUND During the Historic Preservation Board meeting on August 4, 1999, the Board reviewed the City's proposal to expand the municipal tennis center to the west, which involved closing a portion of NW 3rd Avenue between Atlantic Avenue and NW 1st Street and included the relocation of the 1935 Williams House. The Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the expansion, subject to the condition that the Williams house be relocated as planned. However, the plans for the tennis center expansion later changed and the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) then moved forward with plans to redevelop Block 36 (the site of the Susan Williams House). The CRA, along with EPOCH (Expanding and Preserving Our Cultural Heritage), sought the Board's approval of their plan for the relocation of the house to the Spady Museum property. The Board approved the relocation of the Williams House to the Spady Museum Complex during its meeting of October 6, 1999. The house was subsequently relocated by the CRA, however, the property description and address in the ordinance were not amended accordingly. Currently part of the Spady Museum Complex and known as the Munnings Cottage, the vacant structure is slated for future use as a community children's center by the neighboring museum. The Susan Williams House historic designation, previously located at 30 NW 3rd Avenue, consisted of Lots 5 & 6 of Block 36, Town of Delray, originally the Town of Linton. Today, the property consists of approximately .15 acres of land in the Melvin Burd Subdivision that includes the south 12 feet of Lot 7 & Lot 8. The property is currently located just south of the Spady Museum at 154 NW 5th Avenue. The bungalow style structure, with its battered porch columns and open porch design was constructed in 1935. The residence was built by Isaiah Bruin, however the architect is unknown. The structure was designated based on its contribution for its Bungalow architecture as well as its historical affiliation with Susan Williams, a mid-wife who often times provided the only medical service in the historic Sands area (currently a part of the West Settler's Historic District). The residence was her home for the remaining four years of her life. The house was individually designated in January 1995 prior to the establishment of the West Settler's Historic District. r . 154 NW 5th Avenue, Ordinance amendment Individually Listed Property Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION /ANALYSIS Project Description The proposal is to amend Ordinance 9-95 to replace the property description and address of 30 NW 3rd Avenue with the current property address of 154 NW 5th Avenue and a revised property description. The individual historic designation will remain intact. Conclusion The historic structure retains its architectural and historical integrity despite its relocation. Due to this fact, there is no need to alter the historic designation other than to update the property description and the property's address. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Recommend to the City Commission approval of the amendment to Ordinance 9-95 affecting 154 NW 5th Avenue, the Susan Williams House, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(B) and 4.5.1(K)(2) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. C. Recommend to the City Commission denial of the amendment to Ordinance 9-95 affecting 154 NW 5th Avenue, the Susan Williams House, with the basis stated. RECOMMENDATION, Recommend to the City Commission approval of the amendment to Ordinance 9-95 based on positive findings affecting 154 NW 5th Avenue, Susan Williams House based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (B) and (K)(2) and the Design Guidelines. Report Prepared by:Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner , HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: June 19, 2002 AGENDA ITEM: III.B. ITEM: 615 N. Ocean Boulevard — Consider an amendment to Ordinance 70-89 to increase the maximum floor area from 2,400 sq.ft. to 2,650 sq. ft. for the enclosure of a 250 sq. ft. porch and a COA for the installation of windows and an exterior spiral staircase. I ff__ PELICAN LANE SOUTH- GENERAL DATA: I HAMPTON'< I IN , , , W I • Owner/Applicant Richard Edick & Georganne , ' ! BRIT- HAMPTON Goldblum GEORGE BUSH BLVD. Agent Jim Keavney I Location East side of Ocean Boulevard I (State Road A-1-A), i SOU IHWAYS approximately 900' south of N George Bush Boulevard. —'roperty Size 0.40 Acres ; I °RI STWI°° II ' I Future Land Use Map LD (Low Density Residential) Current Zoning R-1-AAA (Single Family - a»1 I I Residential) r ,,,,. Adjacent Zoning North: R-1-AAA (Single Family c,'" ee'‘ S;: Residential) 1 1• 3 2 1 Q w.M�uv��.,�..�� s I 1i. i� : r I I� * East: OS (Open Space) i 1 HARBOR DRI1E � . \ South: R-1-AAA (Single Family Lv SOUTH 10.OF I 1 3 Residential) w LOT].BLO.^.l:•E.• E U PALM BEACH West: R-1-AAA (Single Family w Residential) 1 1 Existing Land Use Single Family Residence Proposed Land Use Modifications to existing 3 structure which include a o o porch enclosure, installation i Q of windows, and the - construction of a staircase. I <., Water Service Existing on site. ! ' I Sewer Service Existing on site. SEA SPRAY AVE. I I 1 I a I1 1 ,F ,,z i r t,ii"` ' N RIM1G $ • 1 III.B. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Agent: Richard Edick and Georganne Goldblum Property Name: Fontaine Fox Historic Site Property Location: 615 North Ocean Boulevard ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of an amendment to Ordinance 70-89 that established the Fontaine Fox House historic site designation and a COA request for the installation of new impact resistant windows and doors and a spiral staircase, pursuant to LDR Sections 4.5.1(B), 4.5.1 (E), and 4.5.1(K)(2). BACKGROUND The Fontaine Fox historic designation contains approximately 2.5 acres of land and consists of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of the Ocean Apple Estates Plat and the south 10' of Lot 3 (lying east of A1A) of the Palm Beach Shore Acres plat. The properties are located approximately 900' south of George Bush Boulevard between Andrews Avenue and the Atlantic Ocean. Lot 1 is on the east side of Ocean Blvd. (615 N. Ocean Blvd.) while lots 2 and 3 are west Ocean Blvd (610 N. Ocean Blvd.), between N. Ocean Boulevard and Andrews Avenue. Zoned R-1-AAA (Single Family Residential), the property (including all three lots) is an individually listed historic property in the City of Delray Beach as established by Ordinance 70-89. Associated with the property, on the east side of North Ocean Boulevard, (Lot 1) is a modern 2,400 square foot home, which was constructed in 1992. The Historic Preservation Board recommended approval of Ordinance 70-89 (Fontaine Fox historic designation) to the City Commission on September 20, 1989 with the stipulations that on Lot 1, the oceanfront lot, one dwelling unit of no more than 2,400 square feet could be built and that the Fontaine Fox site be subdivided into no more than three lots for no more than three dwelling units (one house per lot). The Ordinance was adopted by the City of Delray Beach on October 24, 1989. In conjunction with the designation, the beachfront lot (Lot 1) received a variance to allow for a lot that did not comply with the minimum lot area and side building setback requirements of the R-1- AAA zoning district. The gross lot size was reduced from 12,500 sq. ft. to 8,042 sq. ft. and the side setbacks reduced from 12' to 5'. A request to amend Ordinance 70-89 was submitted in June 1992 which proposed an 850 square foot addition to the gross floor area for the single family home to be constructed on Lot 1 (615 N. Ocean Boulevard). This amendment would have allowed a dwelling unit of 3,250 gross square feet as opposed to the 2,400 square foot restriction as imposed by the Ordinance. Upon review of the request, the Board recommended approval of the amendment to the City Commission at its meeting on October 27, 1992. However, the amendment request was denied by the City Commission during its meeting on October 27, 1992. The Commission felt that the • 615 N. Ocean Boulevard, Ordinance amendment Individually Listed Property Page 2 increase of 850 sq. ft. was not appropriate due to the alteration of the footprint of the structure and its impact on the surrounding properties. In December 2, 1992, the HPB approved the architectural elevations for the construction of a new residence at 615 N. Ocean Blvd. Approval was contingent upon the terms set forth in Ordinance 70-89, which stated that the building shall contain no more than 2,400 square feet of gross floor area. PROJECT DESCRIPTION I ANALYSIS Project Description The proposal is to amend Ordinance 70-89 in order to increase the gross floor area by enclosing the 250 sq. ft balcony on the northeast elevation. As this increase in the gross floor area to 2,650 sq. ft. exceeds the square footage restriction of 2,400 sq. ft. as stated in the ordinance, the applicant is requesting an amendment to the sq. ft. restriction on Lot 1 of the Fontaine Fox historic site. No alteration to the historic designation on lot 1 is being requested. The balcony enclosure will include the demolition of the northeast corner wall on the first floor on the seaward side (see attached plans) and the removal of the existing sliding glass doors. The enclosure will be completed with the construction of new walls and the installation of impact resistant windows and glass doors to match the extant fenestration. Sidelights will also be added to the doors of the first floor master bedroom. The first floor window (at the bathroom) will be relocated from the west elevation to the north. In addition to the request for the balcony enclosure, the applicant is requesting the installation of aluminum framed, impact resistant doors and windows throughout the dwelling and the addition of an aluminum spiral staircase on the front facade (southwest corner) of the building. The windows are single light casement windows. All impact resistant doors and windows will be retrofitted into the original opening of the fenestration with the exception of the relocated window in the first floor bathroom. The aluminum spiral staircase, measuring approximately 9' high and 3' wide, leads from the first floor to the second floor balcony and will be installed at the southwest corner along the front facade. Analysis LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), (E)(8), (E)(8)(c), (E)(8)(f), and (E)(8)(j) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (a) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, 615 N. Ocean Boulevard, Ordinance amendment Individually Listed Property Page 3 demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (b) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non- contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (c) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. (d) The size of a building, the building's mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. (e) The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (f) The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with the prevalent architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. Design Guidelines New construction should compliment the pattern or create a new perspective for existing structures. Historic Districts should provide maximum design freedom while emphasizing the arrangement and disposition of new elements. Consideration should be given with respect to new construction within a historic district to: alignment, scale, setback, materials, solids to voids ratios, details, and form. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. • 615 N. Ocean Boulevard, Ordinance amendment Individually Listed Property Page 4 Comprehensive Plan Objective C-1-Coastal Management Element The retention, rehabilitation, and protection of historic resources as provided for in the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance shall continue to be applied in the Coastal Management Planning Area. Proposed Amendment In 1989, the previous property owners, Roderick and Joyce Wilson initiated the designation process for the Fontaine Fox Property, currently described as Lots 1-3 of Ocean Apple Estates, for listing in the Local Register of Historic Places. The historic designation would ensure that the density of development for the property was restricted and would permit the construction of a dwelling on the lot directly across from the Fox residence on the east side of North Ocean Boulevard (Lot 1). This lot received a variance to allow the creation of a lot that did not comply with the minimum lot area and side yard building setback requirements of the R-1-AAA zoning district. The request for historic designation of the property and the restrictions imposed on the property to limit the division of one lot to three and imposing a square footage limitation on the oceanfront parcel (Lot 1) was supported by the property owners and was not an arbitrary action. The subject property, to the east of North Ocean Boulevard, contains a non-contributing structure which does not detrimentally affect the historic structure to the west. The increase of 250 sq. ft. is proposed to allow the enclosure of an existing balcony within the footprint of the existing structure. Thus, the increase of square footage will not require a variance or increase the footprint of the structure and will not impact the adjacent properties. Given the above and that the historic designation would remain in place, the amendment to Ordinance No. 70-89 to increase the square footage in floor area from 2,400 sq. ft. to 2,650 sq. ft. can be supported with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1 (E)(4), (E)(7), (E)(8), (E)(8)(c), (E)(8)(f), and (E)(8)(j), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, Objective C-1 of the Coastal Management Element in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Design Elements The enclosure of the porch with new, modern windows and doors and the installation of modern fenestration throughout the structure will neither negatively impact the design of the dwelling nor negatively impact the surrounding properties. The proposed windows are necessary due to the requirements of the new Florida Building Code to meet wind loads of up to 140 mph without providing shutters. Further, the addition of the spiral staircase will not impact the dwelling or alter the historic fabric on the dwelling at 610 N. Ocean Boulevard. The installation of both fenestration and the staircase are in keeping with the intent of the original design of the modern house. Given the fact that the modern structure is non-contributing and will in no way negatively impact the standing of the historic Fontaine Fox House as a contributing building, the installation of new impact resistant doors and windows throughout the building and a spiral staircase on the front façade is appropriate. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1 (E)(4), (E)(7), (E)(8), (E)(8)(c), (E)(8)(f), and (E)(8)(j), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, Objective C-1 of the Coastal Management Element in 615 N. Ocean Boulevard, Ordinance amendment Individually Listed Property Page 5 the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve 2002-204-COA for the amendment to Ordinance 70-89 affecting 615 N. Ocean Blvd, the Fontaine Fox House Historic Site, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(B), (E)(7), (E)(8), (E)(8)(c), (E)(8)(f), and (E)(8)(j) and LDR 4.5.1(K)(2), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, Objective C-1 of the Coastal Management Element in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to conditions. C. Deny 2002-101-COA-CCA for the amendment to Ordinance 70-89 affecting 615 N. Ocean Blvd, the Fontaine Fox House Historic Site, based upon failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(B), (E)(7), (E)(8), (E)(8)(c), (E)(8)(f), and (E)(8)(j) and LDR 4.5.1(K)(2). RECOMMENDATION Approve the request to amend Ordinance #70-89 for the property at 615 N. Ocean Boulevard, the Fontaine Fox House Historic Site, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(B), (E)(7), (E)(8), (E)(8)(c), (E)(8)(f), and (E)(8)(j) and LDR 4.5.1(K)(2), the Design Guidelines, Objective C-1 of the Coastal Management Element in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation Attachments: Site Plan, Elevations Report Prepared by:Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner • I0 .I C. KEAVNEY ■ ?-. li ' Y WINDOW SCHEDULE Nrw ca.wFAtl Nlua,Nl wucvr,10 nuun " (1 --, Iv•rNCv.,,,,„. Mr.. ,ONOj tz !,I' l :,:,,, ,,,,,I,,,,;,:. 1.1 taw wwea e 'y r k Il.I ._. __J(I - xi•.o,. uNa ilh.,ircxu. .I 7�,:Q /�`\\ /\---------- -- __� _'- m L._._= ___ New 1I --- -I AV 11,.ECiURE 0 t�1 \ .HLs1i cr�r nANu ,r IIIV ZI `1 / ---- --- Tf = _: —— ---- ii...Naiu i i :.'10 � 9'..,,,._,r.,. YY ai — i Y _ x l! Fa a�:•"'1'!(i i JR ii I � z - N 1(w ,<Nl�, v( I 13 fWu wf l �t(i''au tt— / � 7 / / LIMig (fk ql wulw.cnl — r' _ SI.C1.- LEI LU1ff, 1 Fry l . ;l�I�r ....11__ pr fJ•_ ..Aa.lO AYOx,Ow i ., % 1�w N,. I�I OB (5,D[L a Y [ , w: ua0-�ll]I _ i z' 1\ ` .,� I'i/ —/ 11 _ e�'Ii,fJ�c In ,°K ,Lon LW/ l ._.. -_ .�....,..., l 1 / �) - f2 1 —.. ,.t[N B[wW� llrI fV1a(1- 1 M Y.NC (f `l L II 'J ou�a*l Asrvv,°u: / $ _ LH.3. t £.ri [ , 1 t pr , f INcwuux .,N r( ( ri1— Y4, r E L I9 io _ uesl[x uruaocu—..wnr u-ul(t_. 111 1I11111111 Illlll 1tsLi,j l s L f u.c 2..± _ 1-ip pils_MNT-DM IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII 1.--e.,,,,vr, �;° ,f:n_ tG,u y (a; w,wcn CO n,w[ ( <Iv,Lr WAIL _ __._ •INVICAI!'B NEW Al NEW 01141.0 1w.0.Y DO( S WEST(FRONT)ELEVATION NEW NORTH(SIDE)ELEVATION RHNOVAITONS TO UAIWIC uttfwr 10 wu.vx uNowotq uKf::wJNu ouxx,fa. .C.:l f/If••11.4 IA Du unNHIE 10 1411.1.1111X0414110,a0,1 Elf N0I113 cuxxw'A DOOR SCHEDULE n[w car 1NFaa w.1:1,rn uanor I...110 xu uu HOLM-OOLDRLTAT l w,m WAIL -r u G. -- ' cas,wr:w It e.,;lwc ar N+-e--- RL'SIDIiNC13 °.;1N IA Nuunu pN.w luBux0 o•u.�xm;u irT. Nmcu xiw- Iv B,w0 [1—-FIunF n — -7y}.�L =py_ o'ar__. LN,t4CAI--+'____--__._ •. l+i_-rN 101 IL a —._ N nccu- —.. •'SI W. A.f. (an 1'LAIAc1AFAC1 NL?01AN1 AA:.NO UOW1 10 hI1'LAtl sIS11x0•11.Ef1�1910 a4ENIrCS-,W. l. Em1 I Ux_5S0 ',Be'I. -- 4auri.1liUw q�� --_._LYEC5.11I.ACNN�,fLiGMlt1S—___ ! r II CI NA,IL0 )J'W.• ,N C UN._CAD Ar .n1�ln Accnamu.sJuulc - -- N.OC ACLVD. DD I$.. y / i DE BE LRAY BEACH,IN, ��. ___-- - nil 0.1 s , H ti;� �1.- - • LII� 1 i ._,...,,,,.., ,,,,,„.52,,,_,,,,,,,,„,,,_,,, ,,, , ... , _, �rw� No•n,_ _ In 1111r_._,..] /: r` �,\fT\�i j/tit.' I l ' n l`j l j . :n,N ;i° c° %� ,% i', ///� �/ : ii� l , ( crI ii lit �lll Ilili[IUll Illit I I) M1 ✓t�' .-,, ��\ ` 1j A . .. �illlllll(101Jllllll�If I!II 11I1!!i� 'fllllll y .L . Nr .n f - qll 1.7'‘Nil 7j � `.._ ' •:. r r „M w L„Ef(aWfELEVA TIONSnfca*loc„w SCHEDULESiIr Cl� ti1 — 41,w w,xt ■ .li—sa—o2 I cN.1B, SOUTH(SIDE)ELEVATION-NO CHANGE- NEW EAST(REAR)ELEVATION DunDINc[x,INr:x 10 NLA.VN EwC11An"ELA um El. °NHN.1,C D.Anxc WW1. 011016 IIMUG MEN.10 NENNN 14g1u.a0 ;CALL f/IB'•I'-0' r f: 1CN(J/10'•I'-AC-All.N,NUVw110 a NYlA40 x1INDr(r1011N0 USNnct.WYLf0- A2.00 N Na1L 'NLrr m.n'ww n,w () G ('9 (1:9 U' 11(! A V al jR' it I r �_ k� } � r 4 'VI 1 \ \CEANBLVD. / l'' �s..Qti� ,I L __: a „ 1 % ;ARCIII I I C1UHE 0(r_9 / \ / I I r.,rr.uV..r I A.ra .� _ `� Io a <il •III61 RI i r54 E90.00' _ _,,,,,' Ma 1 (!)_ I."._'':- ,...,_,...._ Le ] IN r_ ,_ B .rFr ." rr """'b"•"'•"'"' _ e���,� I I I SCONDFLOORPIIN y (n)-2-2 l') ( t-t I w (r) () () (c) (uj j� j�'unit,rr ' I O I - ti a9 S� —. 1 J , {.U r•wa,isi nrr, r I�s 1� I I C 7 —IN —t RENOVATIONS TO uv,na.SO �-'R'� r_ RESIDENCE nLUM o D QC•GOLD n I LAi!_3 — I EXISTINGRESIDENCE. ( I °rA� [[IA PaON i 1 Q I r- col___,, 1 1 - I „ L OCEAN I _ qBY DACI1rPL i �n n o FIRST FLOOR {�°:u"i'".,o:r°ua"raivAkc) 4 ail 1 EXISTING SITE PLAN(NO CHANGE) • I �, xuI N.••I'-P .. I'rnl oF`�c•aIP ION L �-------__.L__ ,.) „.17-. -, l b 1/ 1 r..... • III• •n, y ____ _. [,-.),-„,„),,„:„:::::::::::::::::T,1,==' (..) �.� _�` _____ _.____.______JJJ I II ..,,I, 1 i __ ____ --)-- 1 1i __ 1 1 ___•,...., , io ...I I I - .rr I SITE PLAN A'D.ANiICO�AN � 1 ���0 BIAII{ i . FLOOR PLANS _�... • D I 1 (> Aug 06 os I. .r O... (n) (�;) ("J (J `). . .``.e.. w.(A •_.................(aw .uu.011016 — ___ BASEMENT/GARAGE PGW 0 Al.00 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: June 19, 2002 AGENDA ITEM: Ill. A. ITEM: O'Neal House, 910 NE 2"d Avenue— Recommendation to the City Commission of the Historic Designation for a c. 1926 Mediterranean-Revival house for listing in the Local Register of Historic Places. - IA II I ) I .HEATHER LANE I I I N. E. 14TH ST. HIGHLAND LN GENERAL DATA: - I Il I Owner/Applicant Jack Frysinger — N.E. 13TH ST. Agent Starr Brigante _ Location Northwest corner of 1 Northeast 9th Street and N.E. 1 12TH ST. Northeast 2nd Avenue. _ — Property Size 0.49 Acres _ Future Land Use Map LD (Low Density Residential) _ Current Zoning R-1-AAA (Single Family — N.E. „TH _ Residential) w I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Adjacent Zoning North: R-1-AAA (Single Family W ' —N — ` I QN.E. 107H ST Residential) �� <"' I I I_ East: R-1-A (Single Family I I I I Residential) N.E. 9TH Qr,ufh• R_1_A A 0 ( inglc Family — (I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 ( ! I I [ I , I I I I !_ '-1 Lw 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-1�' I1 1 I 1 1 11 11 Residential) — ZI �I West: R-1-AAA (Single Family l BOULEVARD I Residential) - Existing Land Use Single Family Residence _Z I 1 QP��G� Proposed Land Use Historic Designation for a c. of I I ,_Z N.E. 7TH ST. ,PQG `4 I 1926 Mediterranean-Revival house for listing in the Locales I 0°°yiiii Register of Historic Places. `mi Water Service Existing on site. — N.E. 6TH ST. Sewer Service Existing on site. ` I..P°'G~ °m '''' — N.E. 5TH TERR. N iiN.E. 5TH CT. N.E. 5TH ST. Ill III I 1 �_ 11111111 =-1I ' IN N.E. 4TH ' ! I I Iq III.A. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Item: Recommendation for the listing of an individual property in the Local Register of Historic Places Location: 910 NE 2nd Avenue, O'Neal Residence ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is to recommend to the City Commission, the listing of the 910 NE 2nd Avenue in the Local Register of Historic Places, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C). BACKGROUND The proposed designation consists of Lots 1-3, 28, & 29, Block 10 of the Dell Park subdivision, which is presently a vacant lot with a single family residence in the center of the property. Constructed c. 1926, the 3,057 sq. ft. structure and garage at 910 NE 2nd Avenue, located on Lot 3, is a good example of a Mediterranean-Revival style residence. Home to S.E. O'Neal, one of Delray's boom time settlers, the structure remains architecturally sound having retained many of its stylistic features including a high-relief door surround, barrel tile roof, smooth stucco exterior, and arched fenestration. In addition to the house, a 400 sq. ft garage was constructed and lies to the west (behind) of the house. The construction dates run parallel with the early settlement of nearby Del-Ida Park Historic District and shares some common architectural influences of that district as well as the Mediterranean-Revival influences in South Florida during the 1920s. However, the structure is outside of the boundaries of the five historic districts. The residence is unique in its own right and would be a good addition to the Local Register as an individually listed property. In 1987, the City of Delray Beach passed Ordinance 13-87 establishing the Historic Preservation Board and the process for promoting and listing historically, archaeologically, and architecturally significant sites and properties in a Local Register of Historic Places. Currently, there are five historic districts and twenty-five individually listed properties. During its meeting on June 5, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board set the public hearing for June 19, 2002 to discuss the proposed designation and provide a recommendation to the City Commission for the individual historic property listing. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION LDR Section 4.5.1 (B)(2) states that one or more of the following criteria must be met for listing in the Local Register of Historic Places in order to be considered an historically significant property: Individual Property, Local Register Nomination for 910 NE 2nd Avenue Page 2 (a) Is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history (for example the homestead of a local founding family); (b) Is the site of a historic event with significant effect upon the city, state, or nation; (c) Is associated in a significant way with a major historic event, whether cultural, economic, social, military, or political; (d) Exemplifies the historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of the community in history; or (e) Is associated in a significant way with a past or continuing institution which has contributed substantially to the life of the city. To be considered architecturally significant, according to LDR Section 4.5.1 (B)(3), one or more of the following criteria must be met for listing in the Local Register of Historic Places: (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles; (b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction; (c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder; or (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. The residence at 910 NE 2nd Street, built c. 1926 as a single-family residence is being considered for listing in the Local Register of Historic Places for historical significance under the criterion of LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(2)(a) as the residence of one of Delray's early residents, politically and socially active in the community. The dwelling can also be designated under the criterion LDR Section 4.5.1(C)(3)(a) and (b) as the structure is architecturally significant for its unique interpretation of a Mediterranean-Revival style structure and for its representation of architectural development in Delray Beach and South Florida in the 1920s. If approved, waivers will be processed to allow construction of two single family houses on the balance of the property. It appears that the structure has not been well maintained over the years. Therefore, prior to action associated with the waivers, a certified engineer's report must be provided that addresses the viability of rehabilitating and/or restoring the structure. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. Individual Property, Local Register Nomination for 910 NE 2"d Avenue Page 3 2. Based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(B)(2) & (3), recommend to the City Commission that the residence and associated property at 910 NE 2nd Avenue be listed in the Local Register of Historic Places. 3. Based upon a failure to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(B)(2) & (3), recommend to the City Commission that the residence and associated property at 910 NE 2nd Avenue not be listed in the Local Register of Historic Places. RECOMMENDATION. Based upon positive findings, with respect to LDR Sections .4.5.1 (B)(2)(a) & 4.5.1(B)(3)(a) and (b), recommend to the City Commission that the residence and associated property at 910 NE 2nd Avenue be listed in the Local Register of Historic Places. Attachments: • Designation Report written by Mr. Jack Frysinger and Starr Brigante DESIGNATION REPORT 5. E. O'NEAL HOUSE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA O'NEAL HOUSE 910 N.E. 2ND AVENUE DESIGNATION REPORT O'NEAL HOUSE Table of Contents I. General Information II. Location Map III. Architectural Significance IV. & V. Historical and Cultural Significance VI. Statement of Significance VII. Bibliography and Sources I. GENERAL INFORMATION Location: 910 N.E. 2nd Avenue, Delray Beach Palm Beach County, Florida Date of Construction: Unknown. Prior to 1926 Architect: Unknown Builder: Probably Fred Link Present Owner: Russell and Judy Greene of the same address Present Use: Residential Present Zoning: R 1-AA Legal Description: Lots 1, 2, 3, 28 & 29, Block 10, Dell Park, Delray Beach, Palm Beach County, PB 8, Pg 56 Property Control Number: 12 43 46 09 28 010 0010 Classification for Designation: Architectural III. ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE The O'Neal house portrays the environment of 1920's architecture in Delray Beach. It is built of wood frame construction and embodies the distinguishing characteristics of the Mediterranean Revival style reflecting both the design and craftsmanship of that style. In the opinion of Sam Ogren, Jr, son of famed local architect Samuel Ogren, along with statements from several others from old Delray families, evidence strongly indicates that this home was the work of Fred Link, a prominent local builder circa 1926 in Delray Beach. Research of Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, indicate that in 1920 there was no survey of the Del-Ida plat. However, the 1926 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map does show the Dell Park plat adjacent to and north of the Del- Ida plat. The O'Neal house and garage are included on the 1926 map. Therefore, one can conclude the O'Neal House was constructed subsequent to 1920 and prior to the 1926 Sanborn survey. The O'Neal house is located at 910 NE 2nd Avenue and lies between N.E. 9th Street and N.E. 10th Street, on the west side of N.E. 2nd Avenue. Constructed in the early to mid 1920's and designed by an unknown architect, the building is a good example of the Mediterranean Revival style which was popular in Delray Beach during the Florida Boom of the 1920's and can still be seen throughout the neighboring Del-Ida Historic District today. The house conforms almost exactly to the features characteristic of the Mediterranean Revival style as described in the Delray Beach Design Guidelines (1). The Mediterranean Revival style is characterized by one and two story structures with stucco finish, wood, stone and concrete accents and multi-rank asymmetrical facade massing. Multi-plane cross gabled roofs are often combined with pitched shed roofs most of which are covered in clay barrel tile. Windows are multi-paned double or single hung sash, or casements. Arched windows are found above windows and door openings (1) often accented with carved stonework, columns or pilasters. Elaborate chimney caps, usually topped with barrel tile and functional or decorative balconies are characteristic of the style. While basically rectangular in form, the O'Neal House emphasizes the asymmetric massing of the Mediterranean Revival style with two different planes on the front elevation, additionally the three different roof heights and styles contribute to the typical asymmetric façade massing. (1) Of particular architectural interest is the entrance to the home which displays a large paneled pecky cypress wood door with a Greek-inspired, high- relief concrete surround and topped by a projecting cornice and brackets. It is featured in Delray Beach Design Guidelines, 1990, see page 36, "Original entrances display pride in place." On the first floor front façade a shed barrel terra-cotta tile roof covers the sunroom/porch. On the second floor, the master bedroom suite is covered by a high pitched front-facing gable roof with roof vent covered with asphalt shingles which is believed to have replaced the original barrel terra-cotta tile. The roof line and gable eaves display the original style of barrel tiles. Behind the second story, which covers less than half of the first floor, is a parapet surrounding a built-up, flat roof. The southwest corner of the parapet reflects a decorative step. The walls of the house are finished in smooth stucco. The wood framed windows are either single or double hung sash with a 6/1 or 4/1 light configuration. All windows display deep sills. The windows on the front façade in the first floor sunroom are tall casements topped with fanlights along all three sides of the sunroom/porch. They are all presently covered with metal- louvered awning shutters which were on the house when purchased by the present owners in 1974. The first floor contains four rooms plus a kitchen, bath, and a magnificent sunroom; with the exception of the sunroom, all of the rooms are entered from a large rectangular center hall. On entering the living room from the front door, to the left is a curved staircase up to the second floor master bedroom suite. Under the stairs, there is an arched top pecky cypress door giving access to storage area under the stairs. To the right, in the living room, is the working fireplace which is surrounded by a cut surface stone façade without a mantle. The sunroom is entered from the right side living room directly opposite the fireplace through double wood multi-paned French doors. Upon entering the center hall, a large bedroom is to the left with double closets, with fanlights to the front and one to the side of the house. Presently there is a side entrance to this room on the south wall. Continuing down the hall, is the third bedroom to the left with one closet and two large windows offering wonderful light into the modest sized room. At the end of the hall, there is a full bath complete with a large tub, toilet and sink. Opposite the bedrooms, on the right side of the center hall, are entries into the kitchen and dining room first, then the kitchen at the end of the hall. The dining room has two large windows on the north wall of the house. A breakfast nook can be found off the kitchen which has a large pantry on the back (west) wall of the house and to the right of that is a laundry room which leads to the back yard of the home. When taking the curved staircase to the second floor, you will enter the bright and airy master bedroom suite with a full bath, a dressing area and built-in closets to the back of the room facing the west. There are three windows facing the front of the house and one facing the west offering bright ample light and air circulation. The dressing area has a door which leads you out to the flat roof over the kitchen, dining room and bedrooms below. All rooms, with the exception of the kitchen and bathrooms, still have the original wood flooring. All window and door trim is of solid undecorated wood stained a dark brown. To the west of the main dwelling at the rear of the house, is a small, detached, two car garage of frame construction covered with a rough textured stucco exterior finish believed to have also been constructed circa 1926. The garage displays a flat roof with a parapet wall trimmed with barrel terra cotta tile. Inside, the roof beams and exterior wall framing are exposed. There are several windows covered with what appears to be the original exterior wood window coverings. There are wood, double doors on rollers that open from side to side on a metal rail. Originally, there was a bathroom/wash area in the back corner of the garage which included a toilet. The walls and door to this room are intact. The house is unaltered with the exception of an addition to the second floor master bedroom suite in 1941. (1) Delray Beach Design Guidelines, 1990, see page 36, "Original entrances display pride in place." IV and V. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL HISTORY The O'Neal family has an interesting and significant role in the history of Delray Beach. Samuel Elliot (S. E.) O'Neal was the eldest of four brothers who moved to Delray Beach from Fairfax County, South Carolina. As to time, our best guess is approximately 1918, the conclusion of World War I. The brothers and ages are as follows per Voter Registration records: Name 1918 Age 1936 Age Samuel Elliot 26 44 Theodore Mathew 24 42 H. Malcolm 15 33 Fred A. 14 32 The brothers were produce farmers west of Delray for a number of years and gradually moved to town as the farm prospered. S. E. O'Neal married Shirley Bradley in 1921. They purchased 910 N. E. 2nd Avenue from Herbert Harrington on May 21, 1930. Shirley's sister, Ida Bradley, held a trust deed on the property for $1,200, recorded April 21, 1931 until March 32, 1942. 5. E. and Shirley O'Neal had one son, Bradley O'Neal. Bradley was the first Delray Beach resident to die in the armed forces in World War II. He was killed during the Italian campaign in 1942. The local VFW Post is named in his honor along with Alfred Priest, who was killed in the Pacific War Theatre. Bradley bequeathed one-half of his serviceman's life insurance policy, in the amount of $5,000, to the Delray Beach School Library. This was a significant sum in 1942. He is included on the memorial of World War II deaths in Veterans Park. S. E. O'Neal died in 1970 of a heart attack while pruning the mango trees on the 910 N. E. 2nd Avenue property. Shirley O'Neal died in 1973, and Russell and Judy Greene purchased the property from her estate in 1974. They are the present owners. T. M. O'Neal, the next eldest brother, was listed in the 1920 Palm Beach County directory as a garage owner in the town of Delray Beach. He later entered the insurance business and maintained art office above Huber's Drugstore, a city landmark. T. M. O'Neal was elected to the Delray Beach City Council for a 2 year term starting in 1925. During his tenure, he was part of the contract with Don Ross to build the City of Delray Beach Golf Course, the contract to furnish power and light to the city of Boca Raton, and the sale of the power and light plant to Florida Power and Light. He later became a Palm Beach County Commissioner. Fred A. O'Neal became a lawyer. The Delray Beach Historical Society has a file of stock certificates and patents indicating he invested in several local businesses. In summary, the O'Neal family played a large role in the history of Delray Beach. VI. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The O'Neal house is significant for its architecture. It is a classic Mediterranean Revival style with virtually all its' original exterior architectural features intact. It is also believed to be built by Fred Link, a well known 1920's builder. The O'Neals were prominent figures in the 1920's city government and son Bradley, significant in its history and institutions. CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION To qualify as an historic site, the property must fulfill one or more of the criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1 (B) (2) or (3) of the Land Development Regulations. The O'Neal House fulfills four of the criteria of Section 4.5.1 (B) (3) as follows: Section 4.5.1 (B) (3) (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles: The O'Neal House is an excellent example of the Mediterranean Revival style which gained popularity throughout South Florida during the 1920s. (b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction: The major defining characteristics of the Mediterranean Revival style are present in the O'Neal House. Moreover, most of the defining exterior details and design elements remain on the structure, making it all the more significant for future generations to appreciate. (c) Is an historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder: The building is an historic example of the residential work designed and executed by Fred Link, a Delray Beach builder. (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. The quality of the exterior ornamental elements such as the decorative concrete door surround reflects artistry and attention to detail reflective of that era. 4.5.1 (B) (2) The O'Neals were significant contributors to the history of Delray Beach. Bradley, son of 5. E. O'Neal, known as a World War II fallen hero named on the Veterans Park Memorial and namesake of our Local VRW. T.M. O'Neal is an early city councilman, 1925, 1926, and his participation in the development of the city's Don Ross designed golf course. VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES Delray Beach Historical Society's file on Fred O'Neal Building Cards, City of Delray Beach, Florida Florida Master Site File Form, 910 N.E. 2"d Avenue, May 5, 1986 Delray Beach Historic Sites Survey, by John P. Johnson, Historic Palm Beach County Preservation Board, July 1987 Delray Guidelines for Historic Places, A Preservation Manual, compiled by the Historic Preservation Board, Delray Beach, 1990. Registered Voters, 1936 Political History of Delray, 1951 Gladiola Festival Palm Beach County Land Transfer Records Oral History: Ernest Simon, Esq. Comments on Bradley O'Neal's school days (contribution to Delray Beach School Library) and T. M. O'Neal Oral History: VFW Priest/O'Neal Post members: Comments by Buddy Sabo, Earl Owens and Donald Gibson Oral history of Helen O'Neal, 2nd wife of Fred O'Neal Oral history of Margaret O'Neal, wife of G. Allen O'Neal, a nephew of the four O'Neal brothers, son of Gilmore O'Neal, a brother who did not move to Delray Beach from Fairfax County, South Carolina. G. Allen O'Neal came to Delray Beach and lived with S. E. and Shirley O'Neal after Bradley's death. He was in the insurance business in Lake Worth and Trustee for Shirley O'Neal's estate. Historic Designation Report prepared by Jack Frysinger and Starr Deppe-Brigante. • HISTORIC PRESERVATION MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Item: IV. A. - Meeting of June 19, 2002 Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the addition of awnings on the on the Anchorage Condo Building. Location: 60 Marine Way ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the design elements associated with a Class I site plan modification for the addition of awnings on the front façade of the Anchorage Condo Building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The two-story multi-family structure is located on the west side of Marine Way, between Atlantic Avenue and SE 1st Street, in the Marina historic district and RM (Medium Density Residential) zoning district. Designed as a Monterey style structure, the contributing building was constructed in 1941 and expresses detailed architectural elements related to the style including a cantilevered second story balcony with detailed railings and low-pitched roof. There have been no recent Board actions in relation to this property. PROJECT DESCRIPTION /ANALYSIS Project Description: The project proposal is to install two yellow shed style fabric awnings on the second- story front façade (east and south sides) of the structure. The awnings will project 2' from the structure and will measure 2' in height. The awning on the south façade will measure approximately 8' in length while the corner awning on the east and south façades will measure 7' (east) and 5' (south) in length respectively for a total of 12'. A scalloped border will decorate the bottom of each awning intended to match the existing awning on the east elevation of the first floor. The awning will serve to shade and provide some measure of privacy for the building from views from the Intracoastal Waterway and the adjacent street. Design Elements Analysis: LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: Item: IV.A. June 19, 2002 f 60 Marine Way, Awning Addition • Marina Historic District Page 2 The Board Shall Consider: (a) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. The awnings are designed for pragmatic as well as aesthetic purposes and are compatible with the surrounding historic structures and the existing appurtenances of the building. The addition of awnings will neither alter nor destroy any of the extant historic fabric. Considered a reversible treatment, the design elements for the awning do not inhibit eligibility of the building for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or the local register for the City of Delray Beach. The color is appropriate in its contextual relationship with the surrounding district and the location and style of the awning will not detract from the style of the historic structure. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness request to install new awnings on the south and east facades of the contributing structure, Anchorage Condo Building, 60 Marine Way, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g). Attachments: Fabric swatch & Photos Report Prepared by:Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Item: IV. B. - Meeting of June 19, 2002 Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the addition of awnings on the on the Masonic Building. Location: 40 -44 East Atlantic Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the design elements associated with a Class I site plan modification for the alteration of the elevations of the Masonic Building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND Located in the Old School Square Historic Zoning District, the Masonic Building, a two story commercial building originally constructed in 1924, was the home of the Delray Lodge of the Free and Accepted Masons. As ownership of the building changed, various alterations were implemented. During the 1986 historic structures survey, it was discovered that the building once housed a shoe store, and the entire ground floor was faced with brick. The first floor parapet was later removed in an effort to modernize the structure. In 1997, the owner of the building received a $50,000 façade easement from the CRA. The purpose of the easement was "to assure the preservation and maintenance of the historic structure." The owner hired an architectural firm to furnish drawings for the restoration and plans were presented to the Historic Preservation Board in September 1997 as part of a pre-application review. At that time, the Board emphasized the need for original documentation to insure that after the brick façade was removed there would be sufficient evidence of the original details to authentically restore the building. The Board approved the project in November 199 and the structure was restored. At its meeting of August 1, 2001, the Board received a COA request involving the following: The Board asked the applicant to return during its meeting on September 5, 2001 with additional details of the entrance gate design on SE 1st Avenue, the design for the panel windows on Atlantic Avenue and on SE 1st Avenue, the color and striping pattern for the awning to be located on SE 1st Avenue, and the kitchen entrance door. The applicant provided an alternative to the panel window system and the side kitchen entrance was redesigned. The kitchen door, previously a concern, was removed and the curvilinear pattern of the grill work was changed to a rectilinear pattern. The Board did not have a concern with the panel doors as previously proposed. Upon further consideration, the Board approved COA 465 (7-0) for the revised grill treatment, full length doors on Atlantic Avenue, and the striped bell canopy. Currently, the building houses the YAMA Japanese restaurant on the first floor and professional offices on the second floor. Alterations to the previously approved plans are proposed and are now before the Board for consideration. Item: IV. B. June 19, 2002 40-44 East Atlantic Avenue OSSHAD Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION /ANALYSIS Previously Approved Project Description The previous project proposed the following alterations: • Replace and reconfigure the entrance doors at the northeast corner of the building; • Change the windows in the storefront on the east end to a four panel folding door system that will extend to the ground eliminating the former masonry base; • Alter the windows in the storefront on the west end to a five panel fixed window wall system; • Replace the transoms above the windows with transoms displaying a 2/2 light configuration; • Replace the second floor windows on both north and east elevations; • Install awnings above the new storefronts and over the existing fixed glass storefronts; • Install exterior light fixtures; • Replace existing signage (to be permitted later); • Remove extant lintels; • Remove existing single leaf door and sidelights at lobby entrance and replace with aluminum gate and grills; and • Install additional doorway north of lobby entrance. Project Description The project again proposes alterations to the exterior elevations. Modifications to the previously approved plans include: • replacement of the folding door system on the north elevation to a fixed door system; • the removal of the single exterior door at the center (right) on the east elevation; and • the installation of single pane transoms above the door and window wall systems on the north and east elevations rather than the originally proposed 2/2 light pattern. Design Elements Analysis LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4), 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-k) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: • 40-44 East Atlantic Avenue OSSHAD Page 3 The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of the following criteria: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. (b) Front Facade Proportion: The front facade of each building or structure shall be visually compatible with and in direct relationship to the width of the building and to the height of the front elevation of other adjacent or adjoining buildings within a historic district. (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (d) Rhythm of Solids to Voids; Front Facades: The relationship of solids to voids in the front facade of a building or structure will be visually compatible with the front facades of historic buildings or structures within the district. (e) Rhythm of Buildings on Streets: The relationship of buildings to open space between them and adjoining buildings shall be visually compatible with the relationship between historic sites, buildings, or structures within a historic district. (t) Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Projections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with the prevalent architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. • 40-44 East Atlantic Avenue OSSHAD Page 4 (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of a historic site, building, or structure within a historic district. (i) Walls of Continuity: Appearances of a building or structure such as walls, wrought iron, fences, evergreen landscape masses, or building facades, shall form cohesive walls of enclosure along a street to insure visual compatibility of the building to historic buildings, structures, or sites to which it is visually related. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. (k) Directional Expression of Front Elevation: A building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures, and sites in its directional character, whether vertical, horizontal, or non-directional. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation Storefronts The Rehabilitation Standards recommend identifying, retaining, and preserving storefront-and their functional and decorative features-that are important in defining the overall historic character of the building such as display windows, signs, doors, transoms, kick plates, corner posts, and entablatures. The removal of inappropriate, non-historic cladding, false mansard roofs, and other alterations can help reveal the historic character of a storefront. The Standards do not recommend removing or radically changing storefronts-and their features-which are important in defining the overall historic character of a building so that, as a result, the character is diminished and changing the location of the storefront's main entrance. Conclusion The applicant is proposing fixed doors (storefront) rather than folding doors as previously approved. The reason for removing the base and installing the storefronts at this time is to allow the option of installing the folding door at a later date. As stated with the previous analysis regarding this item, the conversion of the storefront windows to doors does have the potential to affect the integrity of the contributing building. Storefronts were designed to showcase the goods and/or services of each of its tenants and were clearly differentiated from one another. If the windows are converted to doors, not merely does the original purpose of the building become obscured, but the exterior form of the building, a strong design element in creating the relationship of solids to voids, is also destroyed. The Board previously approved the installation of the folding doors to allow the same benefit as other restaurants on Atlantic Avenue. As the doors will be fixed, there is no reason to remove the base wall. Therefore, in order to maintain • 40-44 East Atlantic Avenue OSSHAD Page 5 the relationship of solids to voids and wall continuity, it is recommended that the stucco exterior at the base of the windows on the north elevation be retained and that fixed windows be installed to mirror the window wall proposed opposite the door system. The replacement of 2/2 transoms with single pane transoms can be supported based on the retention of the original proportions of the fenestration and given the fact that the new windows will not alter any of the original intent of the design. Positive findings can be made regarding the alterations to the building based on the stated recommendation with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(a-k), the Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve 2002-249-COA associated with a Class I site plan modification for the Masonic Building, 40-44 East Atlantic Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of 2002-249-COA associated with a Class I site plan modification for the Masonic Building, 40-44 East Atlantic Avenue, with the basis stated. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class I site plan modification for the Masonic Building, 40-44 East Atlantic Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(a-k), the Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to the following condition: 1) That the stucco exterior at the base of the windows on the north elevation be retained and that fixed windows be installed to mirror the window wall west of the door system. Attachments: Elevations & Staff report for COA 465 Report Prepared by:Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTE& 0,..oe•U.W..•14 11.1 4.44 ik. Cipm.•"1.10.WO•Ill 110 1101.41 Lo Perez / ,3I.,—I••11.0...11....01.— Ir k kurna• Design esign INC 0.1101111110”1114 ,....11....4.4.:: .11.1..1 Pal go 410.0..1‘..11.0.41.1.40.,101 ' i•Pb. N.VII XII 31...In. k,:il Cr my Me.,ok maw , .. . _ . IP I 11 11 I -- IIE , I I _ DI au licon.tow --'„ ;ON 411•4\ ...•1 v...• 0 ..R4-. ..... 4....4,...4- Zinn:1U! ..'"----'---------. 17,.., .0. ..4.^..4 -•—•—• ' -..\'', , • .1..3 EU ... , '-''''',\ iii.j., .. •4.0,1t, ......._._...._.jo,..). Mc. ,........-....-.CD , — --.---T.----------A t 9> En - 0 r--- li i I ',1--------0-- ---1----- ir----i- ° g ° u ' 1:0 CO c -5 --- I 0 g, .9 0 •a• c t o 0 w ce 1.;; '• . --i 4 C NORTH ELEVATION mtA1:110:1•4 i •-,_„. Gi) --._...._. ,4Vii.iFE:Fi!ii i iarr:k:v.°rat I-u j a i I ""--..„...,....„..„_ CON1L,14.1 ',Iltk . 0 ....7z„,...rgArt no.• CI .6 a' ---- uv-f,:::- w - ---.. - - EXTERIOR [III III _...,_ ELEVATIONS c. i , 341= wil.,1c3 II a. 11111 CO L r.G.)I PI' , I ...T.!!v... _ / 1.....I li.00000 II i . j (11...„,:::176:To i otol 1 v.,..:•.•• in.pot:: .q q. •.I.i 4.,..,••,...o.•,u• ..^.• R IT_ .,r, .11..10.• 1,i r ‘"'"1:1:1 ,.,.,. II D / 11i VII.1.tr. Liiial **I 1 .A. r, ,, .,10,---, FMNEITOMNI 03 1"""' r"... c — • r ,..- , I 1. 1 I , .• I , 1 , _.-_,-L SS SS [ ....° EAST ELEVATION tg :IIIIr _ A300 }.crtur.v.rr virftzear" ...,,,, O ,.....„_,._:.1.1.4 ...._,...., ,...., 441.11-4.41 j2 CO CI • 1 Z 1: • EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTED r.. ::. ». r Perez ,: _ ,_ ICUI,oa WITrtlm1um SEIM . Design NC C1 1::::11 na.0 WIa to r.M,lru.o.WI AnCNITIICTVn. CD m..� , .,off. ..o:.r..,.rrW r.•wn rwrr.» 6Q1 rim-47171' — / iy HMII 1N� ..rr.x _/ / o ,-, l. v SOUTH ELEVATION w.r.r. Ter: ti I m U _ (F0� EXTERIOR »aI»»..uu 'I O 1„' „ ®® F91' 0 / +.." m+ ELEVATIONBa,, "�143. 11 1.1— �„� i" JJ Ire Y.n.Y r 2 I M..nr.n`,Jn.•r Ir.1..1 No801-018 O 7/1 / / j O �F-Ilfl� p / ILL��II • o / .-_: . + WEST ELEVATION e A301 cb a 9 . 0 . n1 a HISTORIC PRESERVATION MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Item: COA 465, Francisco Perez-Azua Authorized Agent Location: 40-44 E. Atlantic Avenue / 10 SE 1st Avenue, Southwest corner of East Atlantic Avenue and SE1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is to approve COA 465, elevation changes to the former Masonic Temple building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6 (J). BACKGROUND This two story commercial building was originally constructed in 1924 as the home of the Delray Lodge of the Free and Accepted Masons. Over time it has changed ownership, and alterations were accomplished. When the building was investigated for its contribution to the Old School Square Historic District in 1986, part of the building housed a shoe store, and the entire ground floor was faced with brick, obliterating the first floor parapet in an effort at modernization. In 1997, the owner of the building, Michael Weiner, received a $50,000 façade easement from the CRA. The purpose of the easement was "to assure the preservation and maintenance of the historic structure." The owner hired an architectural firm to furnish the drawings for the restoration, and plans were presented to the Historic Preservation Board in September 1997 during a pre-application meeting. At that time, the Board emphasized the need for original documentation to insure that after the brick façade was removed there would be sufficient evidence of the original details to authentically restore the building. At that time, only one illustration was found. A postcard of the north and east elevations illustrating the building during the 1920's provided a wealth of information to the architects. The Board approved the project in November 1997. The work accomplished included: • Removing the brick veneer on the 1st Floor; • Exposing and recapping the parapet; • Replacing the storefronts; • Replacing the second floor windows; • Adding a stucco band to the parapet; and, • Adding stucco lintels and sills. Currently, the building houses the YAMA Japanese restaurant on the first floor, and professional offices on the second floor. Meeting Date: August 1,2001 Agenda Item: IV.D. COA 465 44 E.Atlantic/ 10 SE 1st Ave Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ORIGINAL PLANS Existing Conditions The main entrance to the ground floor space is on the north side on the corner at the east end of the building. A separate entrance on the SE 1st Avenue side leads to the second story. Access is also provided to individual tenant space on the first floor. As previously stated, the storefronts on the north elevation had previously been changed, and the building's present appearance represents a more contemporary approach to the infilling of windows. The existing apertures on the east side of the building include two rectangular fixed glass panels flanking a double leafed door at the southernmost bay. The next bay moving northward is identical, and the last opening on the building from the corner entrance consists of a canted, recessed opening that contains a single leafed door flanked by fixed glass sidelights. This was originally the main entrance to the Masonic Temple. Transoms run across the openings and contain a fixed glass panel. Original Design The original drawings, dated 5-26-24, have since been discovered, and provide evidence of the building's appearance when it was first built. The drawings provide details that were not previously available, and illustrate that the building, as actually constructed, digressed to some extent from the plans. North Elevation on Atlantic The original drawings indicate that the building featured two independent storefronts accessed by double leafed doors. When actually built, the doors were eliminated, and the corner entrance portico was built. Two square panels of glass that were set on a masonry base flanked the doors. A flat roofed marquise supported by chains projected from the building just under the transom. The transom was made up of a series of square glass panels that ran the length of the windows below it. Windows on the second story were what appears to be 2/2 double hung sash. The original plans do not show the recession of the second floor, and the ornamental stepped parapet on the ground and second story. That element is another substantial departure from the building as actually constructed. East Elevation on SE 1st Avenue This was the main elevation to the building. The original entrance bay was monumental conveying its ceremonial purpose. The choice of columns supporting an entablature is a direct quotation from classical temple architecture. The columns have been lost, and the entry now reads as a secondary entrance to the building. The configurations of windows and doors on the first floor are very similar to the original arrangement, but the glass in the transoms has been replaced with a single pane. COA 465 44 E.Atlantic/ 10 SE 1st Ave Page 3 Interior Plan While interiors are not subject to the Board's scrutiny, it is worth noting that the second floor space was the meeting place for the Masons and as such had 14' high ceilings, raised stage areas, locker rooms, and preparation rooms that were necessary for ceremonial purposes. Of special note is the first floor entry portal. The doorway led to an open arcade, that extended across the building, leading to an impressive staircase that accessed the second floor. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes to make the following modifications: North Elevation on Atlantic Avenue • Replace and reconfigure the entrance doors at the northeast corner of the building; • Change the windows in the storefront on the east end to a four panel door system that will extend to the ground eliminating the former masonry base; • Change the windows in the storefront on the west end to a five panel window wall system; • Replace the transoms above the windows with a transom composed of a series of square windows equally divided into four parts; • Remove and replace second floor windows; • Add awnings above the new storefronts; • Add light fixtures; • Remove existing signage and replace (to be permitted later); and, • Remove lintels above the second story windows. East Elevation on SE1St Avenue • Remove existing single leaf door and sidelights at lobby entrance and replace with aluminum gate and grills; • Install additional doorway north of lobby entrance; • Install awnings over the existing fixed glass storefronts; • Remove and replace second floor windows; • Remove the lintels; and, • Add exterior light fixtures. ANALYSIS STOREFRONTS ON ATLANTIC The building has a 46'6" of frontage on Atlantic Avenue. In the original plans the storefronts measured 20' and 24' across. While the storefront dimensions have COA 465 44 E.Atlantic/ 10 SE 1st Ave Page 4 changed, the general rhythm created by the shorter bay on the east end as compared to the longer bay on the west end, is maintained. The conversion of the storefront windows to doors does have the potential to affect the integrity of the design. The storefronts were designed to showcase the wares or services of each of the tenants, and were clearly separated from one another. If the windows are converted to doors, not only does the original use of the building become obscured, but also the base of building, a strong element in creating the relationship of voids to solids, is obliterated. Therefore, it is recommended that the base of the building be retained and that retractable windows be installed. Transoms Again, the transoms maintain the original proportions, and while the design for their replacement is more contemporary, it nonetheless respects the original intent of the designer. Corner Entrance The appearance of the entrance will not be changed. The doorways will be reconfigured to create an "L" shape, so as to meet handicap accessibility requirements. Second Floor Windows Because of their deteriorated condition, the applicant is proposing to remove the existing wood windows on the entire second floor and replace them with an aluminum window with impact resistant glass. During the Historic Preservation Board meeting in November 1997, the applicant had received approval for aluminum windows. The proposed new window configures the original window in appearance, and will protect the building from hurricane related damage. The replacement of existing historic fabric is never recommended unless it can be demonstrated that the material simply cannot be repaired. However, there is a previous approval on record, and the proposed replacement windows do feature impact resistant glass. EAST ELEVATION ON SE 1st AVE Entrance Bay The most obvious change is at the location of the former monumental entrance bay that leads to the arcade. Where there is now a single leaf door flanked by sidelights (a later alteration) the applicant proposes an aluminum decorative gate flanked by grills in the sidelight with a bell shaped awning, which shelters the doorframe. The original building is quite restrained, and the introduction of the curvilinear lines of the door is foreign to its architectural vocabulary, being more reminiscent of the Art Noveau style popular in the 1930s. The flanking sidelights are treated in a simple rectilinear pattern that seems in conflict with the flamboyant door panel. • COA 465 44 E.Atlantic/ 10 SE 1st Ave Page 5 The bell shape of the canopy introduces an arch over the flat head of the door, and changes the perception of the original form of the doorway. Further, it introduces a curve along an elevation that is principally characterized by horizontal lines. The entrance should be compatible with the context of its setting, with particular attention to the gate and grill details, and the shape of the awning. It is recommended that the entrance gate is redesigned to be consistent with the horizontal lines of the existing elevations and a simple flat-headed awning is installed above the arcade entry door. New Exterior Door A new door will be cut on this side for access to the kitchen. The door is a single leaf, and is not detailed in the drawing. The introduction of the door at this location, does not compromise the integrity of the overall design, and does not destroy any decorative elements. However, the door's proportions seems too small when compared to the existing apertures of the building. All of the storefront portals into the building contained double leafed doors, and they all featured a transom that maintained the same height of the door head across the building. It is recommended that the single leaf door incorporates a transom element and be of the same height and style as the balance of the doors. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve COA-465 as presented 3. Deny, with reasons stated. RECOMMENDATION Approve COA-465 for the associated elevation changes to the Masonic Temple Building, with the following conditions: 1. That the base of the building be retained and that retractable windows be installed; 2. That the entrance gate be redesigned to be consistent with the horizontal lines of the existing elevations; 3. That a simple flat-headed awning be installed above the arcade entry door; and, 4. That the single leaf door incorporate a transom element and be of the same height and style as the balance of the doors. Attachments: • Survey • Elevations • Photograph,c.1925 • Original Drawings,north and east elevations Report prepared by Ellen J. Uquccioni, Historic Preservation Planner . w HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: V.A. — September 5, 2001 Project Name: COA-465 — Masonic Temple Francisco Perez-Azua Authorized Agent Project Location: 40-44 E. Atlantic Boulevard Old School Square Historic District Item Before the Board Following their initial consideration of this Certificate of Appropriateness request on August 1, 2001, the Board asked the applicant to return to reconsider the entrance gate design on SE 1st Street, the design for the panel windows on Atlantic Avenue and on SE 1st Street, and the color and striping pattern for the awning to be located on SE 1st Street, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6 (J). DESCRIPTION /ANALYSIS Grill Detail on SE 1st Street In the first submission the grill over the entrance bay into the interior lobby featured curvilinear lines that seemed to conflict with the rectilinear bands of the sidelights. The new detail continues the rectilinear motif in the grill and is consistent with the restrained character of the building. Panel Window System on Atlantic Avenue and SE 1st Street The Board was highly complimentary of the new doorway system, and asked whether or not the treatment could continue to the westernmost bay on the Atlantic Avenue side. The applicant explained that the change in elevation at that location was dramatic, and the sidewalk was actually higher than the base of the building, eliminating the possibility of bringing the window panels all the way to the ground. The Board then suggested that for the windows of the easternmost bay the applicant might consider creating the appearance of a base, with their objective being consistency in the two storefront bays. Scheme 1, Sheet 300.1 The applicant has added a surround which encompasses the transparent element, and which gives the appearance of a base. Scheme 2, Sheet 300 In this drawing the applicant returns to the originally proposed design for the window panels of the easternmost bay. COA 465- Masonic Temple, 44 E, Atlantic Ave Page 2 While the applicant still prefers this treatment, the addition of the surround to give the perception of a raised base does insure the continuity across the East Atlantic Avenue side, and along the SE 1st Street side of the property. Bell Canopy, Entrance Bay, SE 1st Street The Board approved the shape of the awning at its meeting of August 1, 2001. The plans now illustrate the striping that has been proposed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve as presented 3. Deny, with reasons stated. RECOMMENDATION Based upon positive findings with respect to LDR 4.5.1 (E) approve the revised grill treatment, the revised window panel on Atlantic Avenue, and the striped bell canopy for the building at 40-44 E. Atlantic Avenue associated with COA-465. Attachments: • Elevations • Floor plans Report prepared by Ellen J. Uguccioni, Historic Preservation Planner v = 4.4r ve AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH The JULY 10, 2002 Historic Preservation Board's Regular Meeting has been CANCELED. The next Regular Meeting of the Historic Preservation Board is July 17, 2002. N' isau,\ pAlu /- Wendy Shay Y j Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON JULY 3, 2002 c.`44 o, (44Y ��P AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: July 10, 2002 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • October 3, 2001 • June 5, 2002 • June 19, 2002 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Fontaine Fox House, Individually Listed Historic Property, 610 N. Ocean Boulevard, Rebecca Henderson, Authorized Agent. (Continued from the meeting of June 5, 2002) (QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING) Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for an existing accessory structure. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Replacement of windows V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff VI. ADJOURN \\, h A _ Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: July 1, 2002 7/17/02 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: July 17, 2002 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott, Donnamarie Sloan, James Keavney, William Branning, Rhonda Sexton (arrived at 6:05) MEMBER ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Debra Garcia, Brian Shutt, and Terrill Pyburn II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of October 3, 2001 were before the Board for consideration. Ms. McDermott moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 4-0-2 with Mr. Branning and Mr. Keavney abstaining as they were not on the Board at that time. At this point in the Meeting Ms. Sexton arrived. III. SPECIAL DISCUSSION ITEM: A. Quasi-Judicial Hearing Proceedings Bryan Shutt and Terrill Pyburn, Assistant City Attorneys for Delray Beach addressed the Board pertaining to Quasi-Judicial Hearings. Mr. Shutt handed out an instruction sheet pertaining to Quasi-Judicial Hearings and allowed the Board to ask questions pertaining to the new requirements. It was noted that this requires all future reviews by the HPB to conform to the Quasi-Judicial Proceedings. After much discussion between the Board, Staff, and the Assistant City Attorneys. It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Sexton, and passed 7-0 to accept the rules of Quasi-Judicial Hearing Proceedings, as they have been amended. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. Crocker Residence, 105 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park , Kathleen Crocker, Owner. At this point in the meeting, Ms. Garcia swore in all applicants who intended to give testimony pertaining to this particular project. Mr. Branning disclosed that he had a prior meeting with Francisco Perez on another matter but there was no discussion pertaining to this project. Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is to approve Part I of the construction application for an ad valorum tax exemption for improvements to a contributing historic property. Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report. Francisco Perez, Authorized Agent, then addressed the Board. Mr. Keavney asked that the material for the risers on the porch steps be addressed as it was a previous condition of approval. Ms. Crocker stated that Chicago brick is being used. Ms. Jamison, then opened the discussion to the public. No public was present. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. McDermott, and passed 7-0 to approve Part 1 of the construction application, COA 2002-278, for an ad valorem tax exemption for improvements to the property at 105 NE 7th Street, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b). V. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. Replacement of Windows Ms. Shay addressed the Board asking for guidance pertaining to the type of windows being installed in historic buildings. A recent approval required that there be vinyl clad, wood core windows on the front façade (or any elevation seen from the right-of-way when it is a corner lot) with aluminum framed windows installed on the remainder of the elevations (as required on Banker's Row) however, no defined policy regarding fenestration was established. As the replacement of windows is reviewed administratively, staff was looking to the Board for some direction to establish a policy. The -2- HPB Minutes 07/17/02 Board gave direction that the windows should be replaced according to what is existing (such as a majority of aluminum frame). However, if all the windows are being replaced, they must be all wood or all vinyl clad with wood core. VI. REPORT AND COMMENTS: A. Public Comments No Public Comments B. Report from Historic District Representatives No Reports C. Board Members Ms. Jamison addressed staff regarding the status of the accessory structure at 610 N. Ocean Boulevard. Ms. Shay assured the Board that there has been contact with Ms. Henderson (the applicant's attorney) and that the plans would be in as soon as possible. Difficulties with the architect has kept the plans from being submitted. Mr. Branning was asking about the Colony Hotel approval for bronze windows. Ms. Shay is to check to make sure the Colony's use of bronze on the windows was approved by the HPB. Ms. Elliott inquired about the status of Mariposa (48 SE 1st Avenue) and Winston Condos (137 S. Swinton Avenue). Mariposa had not previously met their conditions of approval by the Board for the site plan and they are currently working with Scott Pape, project planner, to resolve the outstanding issues. Winston Condos has begun their site plan modifications as approved by the HPB. Ms. Jamison inquired about the fence at the corner of east 2nd and 5th (201 NE 5th Court). The owner had painted the fence red, white and blue. Ms. Shay assured the Board that code enforcement will be informed. Ms. Sloan stepped down from the Board to bring a awning color before the Board Ms. Sloan presented fabric .samples for a color change for previously approved awnings for her property at 106 SE 7th Avenue, also known as Sloan Hammock. The previously approved canopy color was not available as it was actually not canopy material but upholstery material. Ms. Sloan then presented the closest color to the original color scheme to seek compliance with the original Board approved color scheme. It was moved -3- HPB Minutes 07/17/02 by Mr. Branning, seconded by Mr. Keavney, and passed 6-0 that the awning color be deferred to staff for administrative review and approval. At this point in the meeting, Ms. Sloan then rejoined the Board. D. Staff Ms. Shay reported back to the Board concerning the Fine Building. Ms. Jamison had questions pertaining to sidewalk improvements in that area. Mr. Krejcarek, City Engineer, conveyed to Ms. Shay that the Seacrest/Del Ida Improvements beginning in January 2003 will include the sidewalks around the Fine Building. Ms. Shay then informed the Board that October is Heritage Month. She is attempting to organize a lecture series regarding the City's heritage at the Delray Beach Library and encouraged Board members to attend. Ms. Shay is also starting a quarterly Historic Preservation Newsletter. She also asked if the Board could suggest a title for the Newsletter and she requested that perhaps each quarter one Board Member (starting with the Board Chair) write a small article for the publication representing the latest happenings of the HPB. VII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:15 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for July 17, 2002, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on August 7, 2002. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -4- HPB Minutes 07/17/02 4 0•. ,t'4y AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: July 17, 2002 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ■ October 3, 2001 III. SPECIAL DISCUSSION ITEM A. Quasi-Judicial Hearing Proceedings IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Crocker Residence, 105 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Kathleen Crocker, Owner. Consider a recommendation for a tax abatement for improvements to a contributing historic property. V. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Replacement of windows VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff HPB Meeting July 19,2002 Page 2 VII. ADJOURN Wendy Shay, Hi Oyic Preservit n Planner POSTED ON: July 12, 2002 ,J MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: October 3, 2001 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. ' MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott, Mike Simon, Gloria Elliott, Rhonda Sexton, Dave Bodker, Donnamarie Sloan STAFF PRESENT: Ellen Uguccioni II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 483 — 44 S. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent — Continued from the September 19, 2001 meeting. Action Before the Board: the action requested of the Board is to approve change of colors to structure. It was moved by Mr. Bodker, seconded by Ms. Sloan, and passed 6-1 for the color changes discussed at the previous HPB meeting of September 19, 2001, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1. Ms. McDermott stated that she voted no based on following trepidations: She does not agree with painting the chimney lavender and feels it should be sandblasted to original brick color. This is not possible as sandblasting will damage the brick. Ms. McDermott then requested to paint chimney white. However, this was not agreed upon by Board members as the white would stand out too much. B. COA 484 — 40 S. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Michelle Balfoort, Authorized Agent — Continued from the September 19, 2001 meeting. Action Before the Board: Consider change of building colors discussed in previous HPB meeting of September 19, 2001. It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Sexton, and passed 7-0 for the color changes discussed in previous HPB meeting of September 19, 2001, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.6(J), with the chimney remaining natural brick color. C. COA 486 — "The Rectory", 20 W. Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Robert Smithers, Jr., Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: Request was made to the Board to consider the Design for Tenant Signage. This building is located on a prominent corner of W. Atlantic Avenue and S. Swinton Avenue. It is a mixed-use building with commercial space on the first floor and 3 loft apartments on the upper floors. The commercial space contains 3 tenant spaces with entry to each of the tenant spaces on the north side of the building facing West Atlantic Avenue. The applicant has proposed wooden rectangular signs to identify each tenant. It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Elliott, and passed 7-0 for the installation of signs on "The Rectory" with a change to have the signs hanging from the ceilings of the colonnade, rather than attached to the fascia or to the building as historic buildings should not have signs mounted on the structure. III. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. Consideration of a re-draft of the proposed LDR Text Amendment regarding Special Qualifications for Members of the Historic Preservation Board. Pursuant to Section 1.1.6, an amendment to the LDRs may not be made until a recommendation is obtained from the Planning & Zoning Board. The proposed text read as follows: One member of the Board shall be a registered architect in the State of Florida; one member shall be a landscape architect; and a third member shall be either a registered architect or a person with expertise in the construction industry. To the extent that such persons apply, the City Commission may appoint other professional members from the disciplines of history, architectural history, planning, or other historic preservation related disciplines such as design, urban planning, American studies, American civilization or cultural geography. Preference should be given to professional and lay persons who own property within historic districts or whose property is individually listed in the Local Register of Historic Places. It was moved by Mr. Bodker, seconded by Ms. Sloan, and passed 5-2 to re-draft the proposed LDR Text Amendment regarding Special Qualifications for Members of the Historic Preservation Board. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None B. BOARD MEMBERS None C. STAFF None V. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for October 3, 2001, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on July 10, 2002. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: July 17, 2002 AGENDA ITEM: IV.A. ITEM: 105 NE 7th Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District— Consider a recommendation for a tax abatement for improvements to a contributing historic property. N.E. 12TH ST. Ti 1 GENERAL DATA: z 2 'N.W. 11TH Tr N.E. 11TH ST. Owner/Applicant Kathleen Crocker I 1 Agent Francisco Perez-Azua T Location North side of Northeast 7th • N.E. 11oTM ST. Street, approximately 250' I east of Swinton Avenue. - Property Size 0.28 Acres I N.E. 9TH ST. Future Land Use Map LD (Low Density - Residential, 0-5 , M0 L Units per Acre) - .- '� current Zoning R-1-AA (Single Family •_< W. ' H GEORGE BUSH \ Residential) Adjacent Zoning North: R-1-AA (Single Family �z ,? Residential) ; 1111■Q> .'.. , N.E. H ST. East: R-1-AA (Single Family , Residential) '"'�� ( ,4s, ' South: R-1-AA (Single Family �� I �Q Js- Residential) SDI N.E. 5TH ST._ r—, �0 West: R-1-AA (Single Family _ J pc,. Residential) - Existing Land Use Single Family Residence -Z o ` NE. 5TH TERR. - z Proposed Land Use Single Family Residence Water Service Existingon site. N •_ `N Sewer Service Existing on site. ic N.E. 5TH CT.di‘ ', TRINITY N.E. 5TH T. LUTHERAN 1 111 LAKE VIDA ROAD N.E. 4TH ST. ' CASON METHODIST CHURCH III y, V t N IV.A. DLLRAYBEACH - ,.. .... DEl➢.AY BEACH Avi i HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD (I MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT 111, 1993 2001 - 102001 Agent: Kathleen Crocker, Owner Project Name: 105 NE 7th Avenue Ad Valorum Tax Exemption Project Location: 105 NE 7th Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is to approve a COA for an ad valorem tax exemption for improvements to a contributing building in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The residence at 105 NE 7th Street was constructed in 1941 and is considered a contributing building within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The subject property is located on the north side of NE 7th Street, between North Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue, and is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). The property consists of two lots with a total frontage of 100' and a depth of 120'. Previously the lots contained a two bedroom, two bathroom 1,211 sq. ft. house, as well as a detached one story garage at the northwest corner of the property. Over the years a number of alterations have occurred the most obvious is the enclosure of the front porch with a series of jalousie windows. PROJECT DESCRIPTION In August 2001, a COA application was submitted for the property. The proposal included the demolition of the one car garage with a modification to the extant dwelling, construction of a two-story 1,583 sq. ft. addition (resulting in a 2,794 sq. ft. air- conditioned space) and swimming pool, and various site improvements such as installation of Chicago brick paver walkways, deck, and driveway and installation of a fence and gate. At its meeting of September 19, 2001, the Board reviewed and approved the project (COA 475), subject to the following conditions: 1. That the facing material for the risers on the porches on the south elevation be specified. 2. That the material, height and design for the gate and fence between the west property and the new addition be specified. 3. That the house remains a single family residence. Agenda Item: IIB July 17, 2002 105 NE 7th Street Ad Valorum Page 2 The proposed improvements (as state above) are currently under construction. The tax exemption would apply to the demolition of the garage and the construction of the two- story addition as well as the proposed swimming pool, Chicago brick walkways, deck, and driveway, fence and gate. Based on State regulations, an ad valorem tax exemption can be approved for a project before, during, or after it has been undertaken. The applicant therefore requests consideration of an ad valorem tax exemption as the project is currently underway. AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION Standards for Qualifying Improvements: LDR Section 4.5.1 (M) (5) (b) states: For an improvement to a historic property to qualify for an exemption the improvement must: (i) Be consistent with the United States Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended; (ii) Be determined by the Historic Preservation Board to meet criteria established in rules adopted by the Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, FAC 1A-38, as amended; (iii) Be consistent with Section 4.5.1 (E), "Development Standards" of the City's Land Development Regulations; and (iv) Include as part of the overall project, visible improvements to the exterior of the structure. The project meets criterion (i) through previous approval by the Board of the addition and improvements mentioned above (COA 475) which constituted its compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The project meets the criterion (ii) as being consistent with the rules of Florida Administrative Code 1A-38, promulgated by the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources. The project meets criterion (iii) as the Site Plan Modification that accompanied the COA request applied the LDR Development Standards in the assessment of the project. Finally, the project meets the requirements of criterion (iv) as the project includes visible improvements to the exterior of the buildings and property. In previous ad valorem tax relief requests, Part 1 of the construction application accompanied the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness. In this case, the tax relief application was submitted after approval of the COA, where the details of the design were scrutinized and subsequently approved. For purposes of the ad valorem tax exemption, submission and consideration of Part 1 of the construction application is permitted after construction has begun. Part 2, the "Final Application/ Request for Review of Completed Work" will be submitted when the work is complete. The Final Application will include documentation of all costs incurred 105 NE 7th Street Ad Valorum Page 3 during the project, and the approved building permit application listing the cost of the work performed. The Historic Preservation Board will review the Final Application, upon completion of the project, to determine whether the completed improvements are in compliance with the construction application. Following the Historic Preservation Board's review for compliance to the previously approved construction applications during this review (Part 1) and upon completion of the project, the eligible costs of construction and eligible improvements (Part 2), the matter will be forwarded to the City Commission with a recommendation to grant or deny the exemption. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve with conditions based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b), approve Part 1 of the construction application, COA 2002-278, for an ad valorem tax abatement for improvements to the property at 105 NE 7th Street. 3. Deny Part 1 of.the construction application, COA 2002-278, for the ad valorum tax exemption for improvements to the property at 105 NE 7th Street , based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b). RECOMMENDATION Based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b), approve Part 1 of the construction application, COA 2002-278, for an ad valorem tax exemption for improvements to the property at 105 NE 7th Street. Attachments:Staff Report for COA 475 Floor Plans/Elevations,Addition Survey Report prepared by Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner Ap Iication Type (Check One): DOS Form No. HR3E101292 N) Preliminary Application(Proposed Improvem cats) ( ) Final Application (Completed Improvements) C HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION Instructions: Read the instructions carefully before completing application. No certification will be made unless a completed application form has been received. Type or print clearly in black ink. If additional space is needed,attach additional sheets. L Property identification and location: /02—V3—y6 —off a9—oo — o oko Property Identification Number Attach legal description of propeny. -zc c4i iue,T0 Address of property. Street /O5 /2E 7LLI-h ST E 7 C to 4r! /�7EA^C�i Pt County Q4//Ll g Zip Code 335733 Name of historic district: 1Jc/-' L dig 1° k, ( )National Register district ( )locally designated district 2. Type of request: (✓Exemption under 196.1997,F.S.(standard exemption) ( ) Exemption under 196.1998,F.S.(exemption for properties occupied by non-profit organizations or government agencies and regularly open to the public) If applying under s. 19&199$F.S, complete - Question 9 on page-five. 3. Owner information: /� 2/20c.A.,-/e Name of individual or organization owning the property 1k7/G 1� Mailing Address 7 /7&--- � ST City i, &g_ _CA State Zip Code (..?33 Daytime Telephone Number If the property is in multiple ownership, attach a list of all owners with their mailing addresses. Se 4-7.979zte,777—c) Owner Attestation: I hereby attest that the information I have provided is, to the best of my knowledge, correct,and that I own the property described above or that I am legall e authority• charge of the property. Signa Typed or printed name e 9 \een Title of duly authorized representative if signing for organization or multiple owners Date — D Z_ Page Two DOS Form No. HR3E101292 117=�N OF PROPERTY Property Identification Number /�-�3- Property Address /O.r-4E',077`A ,S7Z DLA'72, 4./Description of physical appearance:ZZe�/�Lcs2%S0. C 't..e,STD to /j e2 .e.C %4S' iic,y7��, . %k'I< /ZL-i i CGpisr,et-tc,rcf GN /9 ' ac tr4 s s;Y-,/e ,re-i GeauCsz- • /p ?/ cc -rS•3rs O / rs /p / eZ19, 70,1 h2aIZ- /S , /f S4.Pr > -ac/ce —(44 ,S /.s 53 sy.Gr. TAe�ogcl wes een/osecilLy Crzcac.e_ w aze�s he z 6Del uec - G�cF 7�C,e�pp�2e!-e .eeo��c..� T.4 ¢/Cec.�columns,c� /AA P -Cri�ticc�s Thleeer 7�ft.�[p/cJ 'Ltn$ Ltcw.e_ ?2¢i7 C.IS mac. ids o,. f des; r a n / /z�e� .e�Jsrn_0 h2es-r dar tr ln'- uc Kec� e �"7 melee- / 4-Lr','iez: c op L12ao� ' ,Ofc ukk Si hcc/a �.22�c cu5fccLee :.r1i �c¢cv . Jt � � �fce. La�.�o`�G�c lzau.ae �i.eooG coa-s /2e-o(cec.ed, Acc.c%cle ' .e o2:y:na.l efc e .4/�'t s4 v 7Tc72s Cc / 4, :///244/i CJL >` cvooeif shurre2s �.eauu;Ztey f r,,ceer hci24.4.e_ O%.6j/la3L Grp .Sra/1.44.4.s yE//�k � .^sh/rTerLecl Loo•� .% ccc / a¢/l�Cepua,e.-a.5'hz yce.,6/es£ILc, cc.-ka-ce_ cc.nal Ake /zeafc2:rcck;.s c4/fra , s,�xa .Th-e--- :GCce rei02u7az 5-0/ .-ceL (c4=c oll00.es-t. L..z Q pi J GLlrt�c�8 s'c:r1^ v 7<1 0 � isy GcoGlCc-�e�/ca oic r�tn: '�, Date of Construction: /9V/ Date(s) t(s) of Alteration s) 070077 /-i , r Has building been moved? ( )yes (v)/no. If so,when? S. Statement of significance: ja-n-cc.67 h cyj e e_ �cc c. y o o flu r�, h a4•,4e.e o u, �z . l.z.; u ,-, s .se7-7-u4y �r-t �•C� / ((2f beetle prurn 7 sr/UL¢.T eutCl ryioina_z /0 or) 44.2e.37- f o,, gs:-side c-mac/` /&O7' Gr, %:elcl�> ir{i)� AcrlcQJ -eD L< 7O G� /Ia u') Ge.,��{Gs.vi- c„...v. /K2 L7/c, U Gt.LL- 4eZzes �� ho w yLv e u y do-co f O✓ �o _ =�t.e Ac4,-c.e-oR . i Aclit.e_ /e-c.¢11192e- eCeo i'4.:-T as tf et.).e.f/ Z�ze-2c.12.eza � as e fv 7042e. ,VL 4 Li 04,.r o • 2 j e --f- lu o2r -ucul ec.� C.1.0 6. Photographs and maps: Attach photographs and maps to application. Page Three DOS Form No. H R3E101292 'y. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: Include site work,new construction, alterations, etc. Complete the blocks below. Feature 1 Architectural feature/p Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx date of feature /yc// J eE z for.eli wevJ 070<4.1.0 ell. i G. Describe existing feature and its condition: lungs ..r Si�, Le- TjZ02:ci,•n [-porul, Was ejic/ erl l' -jcc%water- ' claws 7-44.5 .rrl�f, -4 `�-�/ ctcf�:c/�e� wGe�e�, .2c�cice��j 2u�s �u�-�-�� ��-L Ca/u 4 c444-c- "% ni/ a_cJtt1L4, iS, Photo no. Drawing no. two-rOS 1 2 3 Li a/ 2.2 3 _,7 • Feature 2 Architectural feature (kb7-; Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx.date of feature Q,V -oa rke_ -ec,v G.cQ , -070/-0wap_,_ Describe existing feature and its condition T�`E'�, � •�%ly /Loan, fie ceC� cittr...s CcA.psra.%1.a n.. Y EYr;S�%nc� //002 • "-a%ceec.c ce.. ;s l Z ii Sc�pr 7 ke re-r_ czou.") cf w cyo ��uiu yA >tl.� �- cG�-�c.� 4;c7-0 evice-s ck Srt-er_a caej2,_ c�. cCerrs e Leos f s f //rr,c.J Ley f,,zct4t,c.c7 /2;skorey �G JYi e l 71,DIle #4 -ce-uLed G c!rtof . -as un cEtc"i'raod Photo no. Drawing no. /2.9,.4.moo.,- cis p cut oG� 02i y1.k,/ck�iccc�c�.•. i Feature 3 Architectural featureWpQdG/ ,,,_z Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx.date of feature /cf41/ p/ e. A22- s cted, iZe-,c 4 Describe existing feature and its condition: /• `" GiC.P cite_0/27,n,jcvoocf,ciaa, s ocJc u.. '�``� n�c `�'ooE1G/oo2s cu, I( lam �1 1�cr�e_ GuSfcc.e-e-ec/ au ie_ 4.e4c7 /S��/002 csrFcletc.e,r. ike- Li vu,cej ie-oorye Cozu -ile Jz. 2. 47.kz s weJ2L cc./ de!241,0o0 e weire- 4(too.vq w Saos.e_plczceo soma_4 Qeci ere.c.0.t 4CZ. 7 poc, ,un' J'pc,, Photo no. Drawing no. ��Drzis �� 1 33 . . i i Feature 4 Architectural feature,S,l Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx. date of feature 9/ New 5, wcc.s /tau) ZaLtcc.• u)-e- Q/YTec./ Io /��c r-tccJyye /snu Deso-ibe existing feature and its condition: Tx�Grau�evAr..care 2 GslQs s.Y�k.� rc-•c� ��i o cuu eo f o%/lru-ate 6 cv00c/ S:'cGu cc -Cac v»Icnmvrr �(1 cf�`f' ,/=to,�lwa sac ciao ecrz e/-gc.1 cv%�li G iec8�02 .'/4 /. uvc�a-o e��vI1 .leie ta.. .yQ.c/-� 4.�-�j ALL!".gel 70144 lam. wLi C Photo no. Drawing no. / Si dt.u.c „Lo .ea.eau l e ./0.0k :74/+a c/u: 19c¢/ ��lvrz3s iS�/G a ? �' • Page Four DOS Form No.HR3E101292 Feature S Architectural featurap/ad,tP.P•..r/Gua-US Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx.date of feature :6-3/0 as-iauur a„1.7 o.e"erssc�!�y /oa cuo2/G cv..e_4e-4-4 a±`e c e�,2y Wa/l Describe existing feature and its condition: e � oie! s � leu `i w4.(�.S a;, 1, c-x/sr(wG Jcuuse. P cyQ /O/GcSTC�GG�j). Lea-"Le-wind ��• GCs ,, i D2�5 ucr.` ia-e t frna-olc/Sec are t wr•F/1 "'Le'"/"-al 164.c.4:12-1 .- Lv ewe,a.s a-. a.a c.Li',4-//t19icy? thio . • Photo no. Drawing no. - "AOTS { � Feature 6 Architectural feature Gt>indoru,s Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx.date of feature Lae_ cec� ��tz Ja/at�e; �v;ncloues in �lL 614.462oo,r s er e;�/ . .r J cvi adcn.vs Describe existing feature and its condition: 42<5. :/tee , - , �� e t!� o2+"9i77i4s .-woc�(Sn-ch LcAiLCQuvs � LJ2"�/_i/1�L.'ceirtc�/1cc,a. //91,7Tiec7f 6/at v►c-c,J. Lc) .lt%ZI /L� Lv%✓ZGtU�� /�i rcI LJG�er—i F'Cc i/L � '� w �2 Lt!/Lt Cr- UAL i yy,.7 Q Gt l,-�o Cr s tlft Lc,c.iQ P�" 1 7 .¢- k rdtt e,c. a-te f- � � /rc,o.• "aced- p�,4 2_ ,C.¢ic� GLG�C[c.t �,E 2 772/4.37 D2,' nc1141 ii 4 ct/td Si 2C Photo no. Drawing no. cF vac.s,�ivtc, w� d� �� a�=cc7rcuc� n , a s a� 3 , 3 3 Feature 7 Architectural feature Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx.date of feature Describe existing feature and its condition: Photo no. Drawing no. Feature 8 Architectural feature Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx_ date of feature Describe existing feature and its condition: Photo no. Drawing no. Page Five DOS Form No. HR3E101292 8. Property Use / Uses(s) before improvement: S%v7e le. ` Proposed use(s) after improvement. 57-,/e Cat/n44 9. Complete only if applying for exemption under s.196.1998,F.S. (property occupied by non-profit • organization or government agency and regularly open to the public) Identify the governmental agency or non-profit organization that occupies the building How often does this organization-or agency use the building? What is the total useable area of the building? square feet How much area dots the organization or agency use? square feet What percentage of the useable square footage does the organization or agency use? % Is the property open to the public? ( ) Yes ( )No If so,when? Are there regular hours? ( ) Yes ( )No If so,what arc they? Is the property also open by appointment? ( )Yes ( )No Is the property open only by appointment? ( )Yes ( )No Local Historic Preservation Office or Division Use Only The Local Historic Preservation Office or Division has reviewed the Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application for the above named property and hereby: ( ) certifies that the above referenced property qualifies as a historic property consistent with the provisions of s. 196.1997(11),F.S. ( ) determines that improvements to the above referenced property are consistent with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ( ) determines that improvements to the above referenced property meet the criteria set forth in rule IA-38,F.A. C. Comments: Recommendation to the local government is to ( ) issue the tax exemption or ( ) deny the tax exemption. Signature Typed or printed name Title Date DOS Form No. HR3E101292 AMENDMENT SHEET Property Identification Number Address of property: Street City County Zip Code Name of historic district: ( )National Register district ( )locally designated district Indicate all changes in the project work,giving the originally proposed treatment and the amended work item description (use additional blank sheets if necessary): Attach photographs and drawings as necessary to illustrate the proposed changes. Local Historic Preservation Office or Division Use Only The Local Historic Preservation Office or Division has reviewed the Amendment Sheet for the above named property and hereby: ( ) certifies that the above referenced property qualifies as a historic property consistent with the provisions of s. 196.1997(11),F.S. ( ) determines that improvements to the above referenced property are consistent with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ( ) determines that improvements to the above referenced property meet the a-iteria set forth in rule 1A-38,F.A.C. Comments: Recommendation to the local government is to( ) issue the tax exemption or( ) deny the tax exemption. Signature Typed or printed name Title Date 1ST ATTACHMENT LEGAL DISCRIPTION OF PROPERTY LOTS 8 & 9, BLOCK 1, DEL IDA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN THE PLAT BOOK 9 PAGE 52, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SAID LAND, LYING AND BEING IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 2ND ATTACHMENT OWNERS OF PROPERTY HELEN CROCKER 105 NE 7TH STREET DELRAY BEACH, FL 33433 561-274-0900 BARBARA CROCKER 25115 MALIBU ROAD MALIBU, CA 90265 310-456-5333 ABSRENATIONS 4 L9 Q- ¢'• CODE F0R4A10N Crocker Renovation Perez Snln),w0 BLUR.COOL u411VAC MCA MANIA nrcmc CACAIIIK,3•I n.pN and Addition Design ..n.n ,u..l0 own •^x MI YW� NO AL OCR MIS.4YwulYrq Al.cm[s 1p•.vrc x9ez.Icmw cpls 105 NE 7TH Street OCCU'»nY f M:RS De Inv.. IS.w1Mn -an�q mucna Mt _ al 0E. Ell. 1414 IXIAWYey Beach Florida paanlr�otane ea-� TABULATION INO INDEXwq • !{[rjll A104 /f1ORCC11.I14L 0/0 -mK gnaa ,v MI ....,.. tu3,l ss :14 lrt0 4 1.s,1m M14I wl¢VID a..c Warn Axil roe0E4 P. < ,Ken M.A., 1 tC wO,nl .N.nan 10 awl x.e. .ql I�1a KSI Monad. .Nava 0 _,,,,,,q, K .a.„Iwn 0 mow.10 n .Ines a T l Ma Q Amon 01 si rot.00 oat ...Amn 0 a.9m..m O L GENERAL NOTES• 6.WOOD AND PLASTICS: .4 91+.re le.¢oa CR..axons„4 sawn v,aa 9.FPdSTE9 12 ELECTRICAL, V 1 CS - oRglalwamnlKrtNxK 109 Z p /e aw ZIO ,�,n.O mC.m.n•,P<o0n.s 11.110.. wnlr.en ie.n 9nnw El 0.SlwS 0 tn.''cam I.Mnen.neon.n lnS 0.DI EP anon rte....... I.A I..Y N,etnan a 9ax.m.0 Weal.a G Q l l> .0 tw OI.N.WO aq SM.9w.rot¢0.911 ..,gnawn Ann u:a w a:w.Yf.1490. (0..»mm..cm ONr I...wlwO SIO.n Pn.•4 N CI '--I I. Or,IswtwlW.nln�n l.0 .l n910 l.0.6 I. .410riri °iu"�w.1.19<I...ganvY. ,9q<nsn1. ala.N.a 1.N..m100ellM l-r as wK.u.roan w..°N.a'Oi.li It�eOno." n �WnroiO W 2 -c lo •w•in`oaal.una" 10.MOM.ar0Km,9u.K can¢ U NPro la...wna.nol,'ni:w1¢ao3.o ro.1.a�vnwai ma Carla oat YaO ct Kma Nlnvlcl u..p .0. .K MA aaa'n. N CC Q wW..0 Own •<6.1179a:_Mlow a1w0l..msr Km.»E von K»,<a MmKlwr0.ln. ».nwwn.a¢..0..anK 9<.im.". cz z I, 1 u lnoa,M 9N w..11 mann Ann Iv,IK4.MwN.w.,a0.lP0.n snc .cow... a.•ii u,i�u uwraia nu'rt+KwOn:w .v I,ww.KN1..1 wenn...OZN w,la+n 030... W 0 .,3 1 ' ,..-,-,----..-N,u--.0a-.A-M.a 1K1u,wM 9Mntwv0 min10 raw0410K..r0 Ya 'L >- %" v.,..1Kwa.a..Ea..O.< cfIn.1 ...t K.Y....say.n.nl....<M w.ssm..,wn q I.I O P.Ka. _ .ancPna Or-a ort m.w.IO.a,gKwv '� l.01 w MEW..nn»n.nln.00..v.c..K Pon U .t. _ u( �.Mw.ml1..K Vaennt'rvt,' a.wmlpn,0wta.tqu.lo.. I.9 0aM N1N AlKan, .awn vtw CC 0 - ti uu1Rn•eUaNKw r¢naL•a,mmY an�it lm.wrt x .Ifui�ntv.L 9w. 14�.•l•¢wlu.•i�iwni va.LL nN awlwN•Iw,.agn<..wa Z N nOua.IwKNsuwl u.w uu..M amM M.,..nw.4.ga.4 la Ell w fN uuK,n R.TI.l la la.x.vw n c.u.I vntK101Nat an,uanl0 nln4¢Y aom[.9.aKw.wwO¢ul ar0l ta0c •'y�R��',�•rob'�b In.>.4.M.N•.n.1n1M..n,ro n.nwlu,w...b ca.elun 7.THERMAL AND MOISTURE F'f1O1ECTIONI 1<a,(ms nl l.••w.w fYON 110P 911a. n.Mtn II1Kr OI w»nN.1 ll0l0tWnl�a.Mm•nlalw Knwl C. "'Ytlw'''lw..lw''.a'ana n.n..w,.u0.. '¢.r.Pri ITIL'rur.lmf¢•Irowaw a..xl ;I II ICY'l,.i. .l9ac Pl0aaIA. flP,%.,:v1 NN.a'l tin Onn.w>u...::..9MaKwaoa 11,, `` •t lnlfn.0911nMM....low MaN 1NY..nN4,1 YIu,1lMri m.r.+ •' na ll"'°na91N I.M 4nW4 lisa'.it41w.�Y unn�li.IaiullYi.Ytwl•Yura.,111��.w nw•iNYixtir till �'�I�vy1111a I11n1.InY Ye al lllnN.alaNlnl l.Kalwxla.Y 11 I I�i OwY(0N14M1Yaa YnIw11 nal 14Mvul Y1111n1.n011 I,r10(OI.4111.10 Ml'I 1nINY.A1.an An 11 neon•,.M .. P 1 ,YN,1,n11a,,,,,.w1•YIMnN ' IN,snu YllnY„„,.,,YMY„»TILT. nnna YO Mt a14 Al cu.uwl•,I'.010.4011E a Ell a I. MY llnna Pa.ILIA Soo M Al N wl9'I 011ux um 1un.N 11 El 1o.q 1.1 IL Nwl la.9.11 9 KYy 0gla wMt Pt¢nrml • war..4M Ma mb..ana.n ont Nma mllw lm mvnluiKiu am«aun uluw 19.19P .mla .M al cat n l ImKt ntm aa.rtal 4M.¢.N1 M11 wq1',IDlwY.ro 9,¢mwn _ _ P.Ala MOM TO a a tmm.a 1 964 0,19a q wl own I "•'� •4"" , O.0 ,au KZ.f1Z !....1 Z°4 m'0.l .as..lnamu9.Ka.K.Kllmloln.<.,n.KOM 'w whin t.MN9<c.M0.0n a:11Knw.4 munM tO.al fvn aa. o�:: ::r'•N.. ' K.9wNra<a'.0 un Pl POLL,.. onT.ng•Nuapm••a•.K.aa.cn an mat smote.oniA caws AA PAM.a ne Anon.ki.60.n K+ 1' 1 1 pnaKK wwitv.1'.'nwc.u' .¢Ny.rcafMlawnK OM.nbbanau • ua�.,o.twK.0 mnulvm..amn,a,..a.na '" nlu r.OK<. . am, .ono .a.O xa sown m99wa M9M aw.ntalrownmlui Pwc. n1n.91a X.'," 1.a to 1wK0u 1M ua.[nr K1M..nf xe a.MauN's ntlu�,in,?.;,tE.Aul,u o�ilinnr.r 1�'Ytlnlgp SNOW vnnnl30N..a..wnMP...mslalli.,f auvw.4 w.0 M.Ma 01atv,a.'auo. x i t n,.•o 9un q K I4 WIC..OM aml N 11I4t.a.Kv14( ant oPIII 0 ir.40 a nm0N.a'I.n•1. P0.0..40 0 w1•-.Ma..a a p.SPECIALTIES I II.M.101..¢D.»K•Ink 1 .a.41¢I.N11410M 01a.9/IT'sa lw1lo a.¢M om arM xa.00a:VIZ1n mn101u9.0144011 •..0 49401 v'ai.04114 Mn.a1N.0.0aa u..3 n01 fmnmK m.+a vnuq.01101 11MYOI.WnalwNnitK.a Kwwl xIMO.S.'iwnio..It/41.11 Ali.SEMI .ai 00.Tornlc.919 .a PI N..,K.w1,w3¢n<a.anm..al.M ¢a,n.Or.Na0w•1I..•0a4x0ant ¢Im0.90¢1naw ByDWFi9 AND WCIDOWgl,mnnaN.O...t1wnK.m ItMECHANICALI mox,a.rY.1 n vnuln IM n1 a003.9.N n wn 0.00,In I..ao..ma OP •I .. I una mu.ona. .nl Y'cnv4MI.9.L.M1t .w.,,,,=.nll,oaag3Kawrv,9=1,lt.Rau _ ...1•w.964 WEE. WHAT I.mS.,9.v.aacwl0 va W ..99.am.. I6 TITLE M mwii:.`.VnwM°nt"'•all,,.n,n .x.n n.M rw.x wn3la.Kruoa ow wm .aKaNm as n0 SHEET 40 u.40.109 n1.n.St, n...19ux "T.....I.1...'.lMw.w...I.... .a uO ono wsn M.t ISO 10 ntnN II 2 SITEWOPoC: na.1.09n0lnc M9n.a Pw•.M,1m¢.ImY4LL'..W.ta. u.0 an410.o..K .waim�o of mllxN.aa ma. x1nw.Pm,y lM Of 0401.11 ituix aKwu,.owacaa.ro n.5 u0a,vlwl9a.a I...n.mwmxK.a Mtla4W nwK .P.m4Im 9wl K aw4• w'.1u.(4(41 a.l.'.,T,V l.100Krmuc uaq T #.7..1::..,".4 u0 xv.e.�a01121 an oaaona.nv9<3lumwnwMfa< 11�wl � 3.Ca`IL•PETES w 1MI YO�0 a•O.H•MM.., u u Clima w Va.•'wNOSES a sr.u0 4Nva9Mt000,Al AN K4a4.aa..t,o0400 name& n.lw1 Mae 01-OM ,...K na.TEIM.P..0 I. 11101. u0Ru.M...c,w1 ro.3 111J0.0ncapu 02 S aa" " n19 01190.E.02.011..K I :4.MASONY3 wlllwt.11Nm11wbv„KaK..lOWNa�a a ar4D+m '1 nrab al3P.KPK•l SOAKS amans MC atq.c..o.¢.K .1.Swn.n,119w1¢Mara TO - K-�- 56ETALS: M Nt.na 0a11U W rT w•n asaa1a,a1 w.a • . . _ • ax SWUM MAW a+roa, - G • • A000 I 1 , . .. .• • , • .. . - . . •• • -.... . .. ••...• • .......•••• ••••.....-•••• • Pdrez Design INC 00-1/8 1.1..ind Arr., • _ .0.EST WTI NEW 1.•MI I I o ....ocon-mar MOE ot to.o n-oo .............“4••• MAI 110iLl 0 ,,.• OLD, i i ........ . , -IT-. • --, — — • \ , C.TD -— •— '' Z OWIL MUT WINO iL2 1:: 4 Ci21) ,• ffi Ca til ILI Z .17: '_-:__L • iiiiii,.....1m=,===411-11TM, Ei)I'.0. (//:\. .,,, '• ,41 2 ,..., ,: ,• LI 1— fi ••-• 0 _; \ , \/ 0 (.7 11 / .i CONSkIll•PII 1 i ,I • .'," i NEW SECOND FLOOR PLAN •• • • : ':•:::it,T-um • ,i ::rjrli—reL __...... — • (E) NEW SECOND FLOOR PLAN A201 . ...,.................................... EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES) cu • • ;m.°. Perez Gl....uul.nv...w.d,v., Des. n —Q (i l).• INC M. C < j...II. nNucor. •ne H..ac rune C lu•a and AMINO •..a.w, _- [t ` :.ate--'�' U .rt m.0en .a,aw . n.. 1a,a: I t-tTr1-r wi"a; ...:. .. '_1r�h Itl=1 i.-...:wo",...:r�,,::."..., L Ii-. -..1.1 1 r r r r r l-�t I I I/Il� I I 1 1 I, �. L�l l r rLC rr"L 'S ���1 J. 1 III I I' I l i�f�I111Lri I11 LI 1.L�STI rll'tll I t_L_. _-_ 1 I.I�.I�. __u .PAW - -- " rr m•';•. Ll wn.muti rzw3= f_r_,. .1.. r 1._ T: t.1 I— T IT IFI -llLWET $'Lti_ s — -- — 0 r 4 o I w z O1 i .. .__._ VII.1, ..y.W.II.m.. _-.... __ _. _—._.—_...WV Prtr...r --' W 0 W Y — z r REAR ELEVATION 0 a 0 _I scut:IA-.I'0 U O o Z W rg U -L'trlrlt1_1 `1'. rrr(L)-rl-rrt O ��`a�i I ,, 1 o r� c>a,a,,.m. 1 1 rrST.T'rV'-L 1.L'l I l L r I I I' 'I'I I`-'`L l �I 7. I I I U /U T '1%111 LI Irl . I1 r r LLIt L1I1-I rIrL11r 1 f 1 r1 LILT. r. � ) ) l�4ri L Ir=L,p1,Ylirl r r I�I i'I it r.. ^ I r1 r r Li P,: 1.1 r 7 1, J rJ 1.I S 1 1 rTi'i I r 1 l I I rI +-'..ram ---- I`I .1 I t ( � r'l"I'Yl 2� r`av — I �{ __ l l l l� 1 �^ I{) (� - �— 1 I I t I L__I.I 1111 LJ_:�L f'I-;T-T' I i rrrr - .t ` ELEVATIONS - 'r—"— _, I. Il-r_l'T�Y')-'11l`t 1 1-11�.'TL.L.II; ` -7 71. m�':•Wr'1- I E� _ I�III I s 11 , — --I I 1 � � I t i a — ri_ o a._.. „a ` T .. 1 I..... ..-G') __ I-I III H l�-`st _.III X.Dwx 01-0)0e • m' .av s __ _� ."______�. _'�'}•iQ —It1__ . � _ __ L._.0 _=:-_C_J ,.m r� _ ,L, 13 .-NMLA ii ._ NtwAtRtYuR �--..._ ------ . IS.a..w.m.m� -------. - _ FRONT ELEVATION scut 1 vo.1-0 A300 . . i'•:::-::::::::.!:•::::'......:::•::::.'.:•.::.:: :::•:!;;.::::.';':••::::•„'•::':.:•:*.:.:','):•:'.'....:.:.:....:...*:. ..•:....:•::.:::::......':.::...',..J:::•;:'•',..-...:•,.....'.; :',.....:::::':••'•:.::::.'...:::....'....:::::,::;;;;.,::::::''..*•.::..:...::';.:::::.:::.'....::..':-:.:.:::::‘:.:,:I•:,..•.•....:E:..:::.:,:-...::...,....•:.;,.r., ....,.:':.::',..:....... .....:::.:.:::::;....'i..:,.....';'::..:.i'..-::: : ..::..:...,:;.,.....*..:...,..,:...::,..;...:..L.:•i:•...;...*:.,::..::;......:..:.:.,;......::..,...::%,......„ ..,,..-,, ,,.......:'....:.....,,i:.:.:,...:,::::::y:,..:,•:,..,;:,....:,..,.:: EXTEB1011 ELEVATION NOTES. ii)....“,....,......, Pdrez 17 Ire.t....E.,e1 ea Design CF).."...... INC (•Ie.emu....en tews nee:ow 10 114.M., ili...RD...MAWS ARCIIITIICI,Iill ....'r.!..--7r..---5.. .1—E4'• 1 Ili:LIT'iii!t•;_r.L.:4:-'-' trri.1,q1-r'iLtrLELri. . • ci)4..K.A.. i ;:li:L:;IL',1,.:;;L: IEL:L.: iLi iii-r ..Lt r rozli_IL_r_r_liii-rii.r;tra4 CF-1.11.1010 0M 11.10-1/a HA 2....1 A..1110 ° rij--41-1)-11-1 I-,J,LrITY r la r-IT IT L 1-LrYLT-LIT-1 1-1-'I-TT:el:LI:1'P;'!L f rf-t:Ti ri,____ .......,,,,t NO 1./.31111.01141•1411110.1.11ge.r. .1.11° ........''.••... • 0).00“0. r;=•77...•:: . [11.11.41µ10011111 ie.. • .---. 7 =.7_____. _.,—._. : :,1 I. i•1 _lb 1_111 _ __I-irt.li-E (i,14111.1141PP....1.141,141 I)IT 1 11 i .- („.......-4. l_e r_Trts hrcLi.ri..0 i-1.______ GI 1- t ) ,.,-1, --- 1•1”.......... 11],-,11):-.11H 'aCilf ' I 1 1 I i I 1: LI i ' L!ILI•a_Illaitaill .LIFILILL,r,Li— ,LI!I!IT,I,T. .1.1.1_1_ —Ii) (T.Jeee,eue•ees (,)......"...^. — - "--tat.:,t.11-- _ _ _______I wri-_--d 11 hi_± •-•1. 1 ! .._ ._ . . . • . 4. — .thkif --- --- -----L.'- .-- .f.17 H —----- ---'•:-.-L'1=-- 1'1 11 - • h -1---.i i --. 14.1 174 < . .— _. — ..,. ._. __ • , ..‘,!:,,,,,..._„1,. -'------"Am-v--c)--- •- _c_, il. ___ .___ . t.-----.. -.:-.,-..,--- - ______ --.- ,, _ _ mot!.MI flUI/.1 —1111.,1,1!1/.14 1.111,1 111 hd p... z ?,- .• C.) ..1C . If• EAST ELEVATION IV , . C011,111.1,11 . •__Tritil ,,, .._.. . _ I„.. ,..... -.- -....•.. _..___ _ ._=. r>-- .1 Ill, ! I . 1_ -'1Zial-'0EL'ite,P; ,1,1,1,I11 ELEVATIONS — -- --MEC,1, 1 I i I i. I I •.1 I, I . -',..,•••"..:1::1.,,,_,-.. .__ _....ie,.191,,T MI_ •.. . . - r•-1.= T-1-7-7-'74•1-1"-'-,...:'ZT '•:'•"• T 1 0--?i . _.,1 1--F,,.'T.7-- ' — :•-°':-: ----1 -,----.• = ,, I--=-F - _ ha*.Y...., =T14111 _._ . FA_ , . fit : —"— I--1- '' ...rt.,'-,..-r_r_ )-—F,,,,t...`,•?..T.L. ma.be +re eroeci eo.,0$-Oe: . ..---- .4 — -- , Zeal: .0.111.11 _..1_ ..< 1 Dry,. 01-011.. - - 4 . . --__ --ItTI * 7;------- .------- - ----i •••:.—=I i 's--T'•TT-) _ILIIIL_NW I I-- I I I ------- - . L et vt,nwt NYI_TIS . • ...4•:.`:12,1•41,I I - •WEST ELEVATION • 0.1.4 1 1/111.10 0 I A301 1 \_0120 1�Y LOT LoT �'-I_I l_Irl II�MM (_I";/ L 1.1 I I.I-111.1. S-oU!JOZy2 18 I —nE-- ON,. --�STi N c-E�.,e,-,T 1`) F�vNo33� 11 17inall"- in , ) ,- 1 : r.oN0Meur ��� ° �oo.00` ` -,,,.„..:n onvm4•3 el enf :::::ILIM:Iii :41;i:lh4ii. -rhl A'+-'' .sWy—/x iYxr - --Y * x .n�c3 Lb' \4.0' 2' // IN ,.JooP�v-�E2. °�t /•�1,0 �d/clzd _��,,4FFE,)cex Pous7 ("��^) �allidl�I I® °�� .. CBS lr! cJGt2EEtJsFO (-15JE CIA r N .PAT o ��eva� ; `�,.®�R s � NIP 1s,4•b` - - y�.`" © ` E�Stp�..T EAR r S••,. Z o,vp (• ;. . O \(o.00' - / a '!A/hod 4-' aAtt-) �.. 10o,4o `i'�� Zo.4o t d : 11' I ' 411 I ilif:M. �,Nc rN`c 2•0' CERTIFIED TO: Lp-1 1ST Q \STo2y 1pT' i 1 O j BETSY A. SCHUMANN,A SINGLE WOMAN, AND KATHY RENEEb N "3OpD�\""c ` JOHNSON, A SINGLE WOMAN, AS JOINT TENENTS WITH RIGHT '` p l o 0 IQ�1��7'� OF SURVIVORSHIP AND NOT AS TENENTS IN COMMON. F.!sh door 3 :0 Q _ 3.2o El..v. L392 0 - CTX MORTGAGE COMPANY IT'S SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, AS , N Q _ ,' 3,2o V THEIR INTERESTS MAY APPEAR. • lx , 8 izno 4— • SOUTHEASTERN ALLIANCE TITLE AGENCY INC. • L. 40r00' 23.So v FLOOD ZONE "C" EICW -�d 41 63v° COMMUNITY PANELN0.11 22.4 • 125162-0002- D J - - Q a -$ eTH d4/e 5E.r/zy sa,/ z/ie/oo xRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A I HEREBY CERTIFY SKETCH SHOWN HEREON IS AT SURVEY MADE UNDER MY J. d IA DIRECTION,AND THAT SAID SURVEY IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEUEF-THERE ARE NO �� -:1- - CO N APPARENT GROUND ENCROACHMENTS,UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN AND THAT THE SURVEY MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL COSTANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND PPERS,PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, cr,0 SC T�lg` 12oT.3 FLORIDA STATUTES AND CHAPTER 81G17.6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. i I P-0D t cJ�P BLS LAY 2I Y2 // . y f _ r l Fow,301L" \on.©p, _ I DATE 4/2d/,'8 ' C 9.c-A? Q REGISTERED SU EYOR NO. •_ Ze 1�02`•:>✓Ro N • N PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON HAS NOT BEEN ABSTRACTED BY SURVEYOR. OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY,AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD;ELEVA- -1 TIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.O.V.DATUM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED;ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE IRON ROD WITH CAPS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED;FOUNDATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS LYING BELOW SURFACE NOT LOCATED,BEARINGS AND/OR ANGLES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RECORD PLAT OR DEED CALLS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.MEASUREMENTS MADE IN ACCORDANCE Q10 -� S'-ra` 22ET A_P4AL- , — WITH UNITED STATES STANDARD.UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR E/c% • � �� Ekv.. 2Z a S AND MAPPER THIS DRAWING OR SKETCH IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VALID. zz33 LB 2102 Joe Tucker uNo� : SURVEYORS LOTS 8 AND . 9, BLOCK 1 • �. DEL-IDA PARK ADDRES•S: PLAT BOOK 9 PAGE 52 RICHARDL.SMEPIIARO mat Associates PALM BEACH COUNTY , FLORIDA. 105 NORTHEAST 7TH. STREET,' • Phone: DELRAY BEACH, FL. 33444 I 310sourh FEDERAL HIGHWAY • Boca (581)391.4388 Scale \kI=2o, By e•zof3la., Drawing No. P.O.BOX 759 Boynton(581)737.6548 BOYNTON BEACH,FLORIDA 33435 FAX (561)734-7546 Date 4-17-98 PO 52'I P9_ M-96.4-I-Z-`1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: II.B. — September 19, 2001 Meeting Project Name: COA 475, John Brooks, Project Architect, Perez Design, Inc., Authorized Agent Project Location: 105 NE 7th Street, a Contributing Structure within the Del-Ida Park Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is to approve COA 475 for the demolition of an existing garage and the design for an addition, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The residence at 105 NE 7th Street was constructed in 1941 and is considered a "contributing" structure within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The subject property is located on the north side of NE 7th Street, between North Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue, and is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). Over the years a number of alterations have occurred the most obvious is the enclosure of the front porch with a series of jalousie windows. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The property consists of two lots with a total frontage (width) of 100' and a depth of 120'. Presently the lots contain the two bedroom / two bathroom house, as well as a detached one story garage at the northwest corner of the property. The proposal calls for the demolition of the existing garage, and its replacement with a two-story addition that will attach and extend westward from the existing residence. Also proposed is the installation of a pool with a Chicago brick deck, and a new Chicago brick driveway, and a fence with a gate between the new addition and the west property line. The existing floor area of the residence is 1,211 square feet. Following the 1,583 square foot addition, the residence will contain a total of 2,794 square feet of air- conditioned space. The area added will more than double the size of the existing home, and must be evaluated as to whether or not it is in harmony with the existing residence and the neighborhood. ANALYSIS DEMOLITION: Because of the considerable depth of the lot, and the siting of the existing home, there is an opportunity to extend back (northward) and to provide a clear distinction between the original residence and the new addition. The front (south) wall of the new addition is actually setback 32' from the plane established by the front (south) wall of the residence. In that regard there is a clear visual and spatial separation of the new COA 475- 105 N E 7th Street Page 2 construction from the original. This separation in distance is made possible by the demolition of the garage structure, which first needs to be evaluated before the addition can be discussed. The one car garage is a simple gabled roofed structure that is freestanding and approached by a driveway on the west side of the lot. The garage was a part of the original structure and features the same scalloped accent siding in the gable end. A hastily constructed shed roof has been appended to the structure. In order to determine the appropriateness of the garage demolition, its relationship the to the residence must first be evaluated. When a property is examined for historic designation, whether for the local or national register, the property is described in its entirety. Boundaries are established using legal descriptions, and could frequently include auxiliary structures, sometimes referred to as "outbuildings." Generally, outbuildings are less articulated as they are functional in nature, and as a result, are of secondary interest in developing arguments for significance. However, garages are a part of the automobile culture, and help to define the economy and social conditions of the period. In this case, the relative significance of the garage to the residence must be weighed against the development potential of the parcel. The parcel contains two lots and the footprint of the existing residence occupies a small part of the potential development yield. It is reasonable to conclude that owners of an historic property should expect to utilize the land for the creation of additional amenities or improving the quality of the livable/ usable floor area. If the garage remains, the addition would necessarily have to be located elsewhere. Given the layout of this single-family residence, it is more economical and less destructive to construct the addition to the northwest corner of the residence. This approach would only require minor modifications and be less disruptive. The plan as designed actually creates a sense of a courtyard at the rear. In this case, the value of the cleared land utilized for purposes of the addition which preserves the basic character of the historic residence itself, far outweighs the relative value of the garage as an historic resource. LDR Section 4.5.1(F) "Restrictions on Demolitions" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness' for demolition. The guidelines are as follows: (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill criteria for designation for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The structure is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. The structure could easily and inexpensively be reproduced. COA 475- 105 NE 7th Street Page 3 (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. The structure is not one of the last remaining examples of its kind. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. Retaining the structure would not promote the general welfare of the city as the garage does little to develop our understanding this particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. The space freed-up by the garage will allow for an addition that will retain the character of the existing historic home. Based on these conclusions the staff would recommend that a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the garage be issued with no delays imposed. EXISTING RESIDENCE: Main Elevation on NE 7th Street The jalousie windows enclosing the porch will be removed and the porch reopened. Tapered wooden columns will be introduced, and a simple vertical picket wooden railing will be installed between the columns. The double leafed entrance will remain in its present location that is approached by a series of stairs. The stairs will be replaced by a series of two risers. The facing for the risers has not been specified. Other than the replacement of the non-conforming metal awning window, the projecting east bay will not be affected. The removal of the jalousie windows is an improvement to the home, and although conjectural, the columns are of a design that is in keeping with the period of the house. While the railing may appear to be out of scale with the porch, it is at a 42" rail height, and is perceived as taller because of the extension of the main roof that continues its slope to provide the porch cover. Side/Rear Elevations The two-story addition extends from the sides and rear of the house, and the connection is accomplished by means of a one story "hyphen" that provides transition between the one and two story sections. The connecting link contains windows and a gable end detail that reflects the motifs of the original residence. The addition contains a master bedroom suite on the ground floor, and a guest bedroom and bath on the second floor. While the addition is two stories in height, the proportions COA 475- 105 NE 7th Street Page 4 are intentionally narrow. The result is that the mass represented by the new addition does not overwhelm the existing one story house. The detailing of the addition features a two-story porch that terminates in a gable end with the same decorative scalloped trim. The columns and rail details repeat the detail in the front porch of the main house. The entrance to the new addition is emphasized by its projection out as a covered porch. If this porch element were not located as far back on the lot as it is, the staff would have commented that this entry was in fact overshadowing the original entry feature, and takes on the appearance of a principal rather than subordinate structure. The addition does not impact the main elevation, as it is set well behind the front plane of the house. It is noted that this zoning district is R-1-AA (Single-Family Residential), and the addition must be maintained as an integral part of the overall residential structure. In no case, can it be used as a separate dwelling unit. While the entry porch is a unifying feature of the design, it must be considered a secondary entry to the house, and interior circulation from the addition to the original residence is required. Site Improvements With the elimination of the garage, the parking is now accommodated outdoors. The parking must be within the established setbacks for the specific zoning district. The new driveway is sixteen feet (16') wide, and can accommodate two cars parked side by side within the required 25' setback. Real estate markets continue to demonstrate that covered parking is a particularly desirable amenity. The loss of the garage in this instance may potentially impact resale value, and it is most likely that at some point a carport would be requested. A carport erected over the proposed driveway would encroach into the side setback and require a variance. The drive could easily be reconfigured so that the building setbacks would be in compliance. The applicant should consider these issues at this time, as the site will already be disturbed during the construction phase. SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), a historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall not be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise, changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The Standards that have particular application in this instance are: #2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated COA 475- 105 NE 7th Street Page 5 from the old and shall be compatible in massing size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. #10 New additions and related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. The design for the new addition complies with the basic intent of Standards #2 and #10. Although two stories, the addition's massing, size and scale is not disproportionate to the historic structure. However, with regard to Standard #9, the details for the new addition are not sufficiently distinguishable from the original construction. While this standard is the most heavily debated, the intent is to allow the continuing history of the building to be perceived, and not misunderstood or misrepresented as a part of the original construction. Distinguishing details from the original can be achieved by subtle variations in proportions, and by the simplification of the details. For example, the scalloped trim for the gable end could easily be modified with another pattern that would allow for its individuality. Overall, the addition is a sensitive solution to the problem of providing additional floor area while maintaining a significant degree of open space. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve with conditions. 3. Deny with reasons stated. RECOMMENDATION Based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), approve COA 475 for the demolition of the garage and an addition to the residence at 105 NE 7th Street with the following conditions: 1. That the facing material for the risers on the porches on the south elevation be specified. 2. That any future carport or garage comply with standard setback requirements. 3. That the detail on the new construction be simplified so as to meet the intent of Standard # 9 of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 4. That the material, height and design for the gate and fence between the west property and the new addition be specified. Attachments:Survey Photographs of Existing Conditions Floor Plans/Elevations,Addition Report prepared by Ellen J. Uguccioni, Historic Preservation Planner City of Delray Beach Procedures for Quasi- Judicial Hearings 1. Definitions: A. Applicant-the owner of record or his or her authorized agent. B. Citizen Participants - those members of the general public, other than the City, the Applicant, or other Party to the proceeding, who attend a quasi-judicial public hearing for the purpose of being heard on a particular application. C. Ex Parte - communications, oral or written, between members serving on the board or commission and the public, other than those made on the record at the hearing. D. Party- the owner of property located within 500 feet of the property that is the subject of the application and who meets the additional requirements set forth in Section 3.B below. • E. Quasi-Judicial Proceedings — proceedings where existing policies and regulations are applied to a specific property. Examples are site specific rezonings, conditional use approvals, site plan approvals, waivers and variances, plat approvals, certificates of appropriateness, historic designations, but not land use amendments or amendments to the comprehensive plan and not generally, amendments to the Land Development Regulations. F. Relevant Evidence — evidence that either strengthens or weakens the application by supporting or disapproving factual assertions related to the application. 2. General Procedures for City Commission Consent Items A. Consent Agenda Items. Applications before the City Commission for plat approval, variances, or waivers may be placed on the consent agenda, if the Applicant signs a statement that the Applicant concurs with the Staff recommendation. B. Removal from Consent Agenda. The Applicant, the Mayor, any Commissioner, or any member of the public may request that an application for approval of a plat, waiver, or variance be removed from the City Commission consent agenda. If removed, the application will be placed on the next regular City Commission meeting for a quasi-judicial • hearing, or if the Applicant consents, the hearing may take place at the meeting the application was removed from the consent agenda. 3. General Processing for Hearings A. File/Inspection. (1) Establishing the File. The Planning and Zoning Department shall establish a project file. All written communications shall be sent to the Planning and Zoning Department. The project file will be maintained in the Planning and Zoning Department. (2) Contents of the File. The project file will contain all written communications that are sent to the Planning and Zoning Department prior to the hearing. The project file will include, but not be limited to, all Staff reports, pertinent sections of the Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan. The file will contain curricula vitae, drawings, documents and all other pertinent documents. (3) Index. The Planning and Zoning Department staff will provide the _City Clerk or Board clerk with an index to the project file at the Hearing. • (4) Supplementation of the File. The City Clerk or Board clerk will supplement the project file with all documents submitted at the hearing. (5) File for Inspection. The project file will be made available upon request for public inspection. (6) File Placed into the Record. The Planning and Zoning Staff member making the presentation shall place the project file into the record at the hearing. B. Party Status (1) Party Status - Written Requests: Timeframe. In order to obtain status as a Party, the owner of property located within 500 feet of the subject property must make a written request, meeting the requirements of 3B(2) below, which is received by the Planning and Zoning Department three or more business days prior to the hearing. (2) Contents of Request. The written request shall outline the effect of the application on the owner's property. To obtain Party status, the owner must describe the effect of the application on owner's property that is different from the effect on the public as a whole. The City Attorney's Office will advise as to whether sufficient facts have been alleged to achieve Party status and shall notify the person requesting Party status of the City Attorney's opinion as to the adequacy of the request. Ultimate decisions as to Party status shall be made by the City Commission or the Board. The decision to confer Party status at-the hearing before the City Commission or a Board shall not be seen as a waiver of the City's right to contest the standing of any Party in court. C. Time Limits (1) Staff Time Limits. The City Staff shall have up to 20 minutes (including the presentation of witnesses and expert witnesses) to present the city's case. (2) Applicant Time Limits. The Applicant shall have up to 20 minutes (including the presentation of witnesses and expert witnesses) to present the Applicants case. (3) Party Time Limits. A Party may have up to 20 minutes (including the presentation of witnesses and expert witnesses). (4) Citizen Participants in General. Citizen participants not represented by a representative speaker shall have three (3) minutes to speak. (5) Participants with a Representative. Speakers representing a group of six (6) or more interested citizens in attendance at the meeting shall have six (6) minutes to speak, as long as those being represented identify themselves and yield their time to the representative at the meeting. (6) Representing an Organization. Speakers representing an organization that is comprised of interested citizens shall have six (6) minutes to speak. (7) Extension of Time by the Commission or Board. The Commission or the Board may, at their discretion, extend the time for presentations. 4. Conduct of the Hearing. A. Swearing in of Witnesses. All Witnesses, Parties, the Applicant, Citizen Participants and their representatives and City Staff who plan to speak at the hearing shall collectively be sworn at the beginning of the hearing by the City Clerk, the City Clerk's designee, or the Board clerk. B. Disclosure of Ex Parte Communications. The Commission or Board shall disclose any ex parte communications and disclose whether any member physically inspected the property. To the extent possible, the Commissioner or Board member shall identify with whom the communication took place, summarize the substance of the communication, and the•date of the site visit, if any. The Commissioners or Board members shall give the City Clerk, his or her designee, or Board clerk, any written ex parte communications they have received that are not already included in the project file. C. Presentation of the Case. 1. The City Staff shall present its case. 2. The Applicant shall present its case. 3. Parties may present their case. 4. Citizen participants or their representatives may speak for or against the application. 5. The opportunity to cross-examination will occur after the presentation of a witness, `and the manner and the conduct of cross-examination shall be as provided in these rules. 6. The City Staff, the Applicant, and Parties may have two minutes each for rebuttal 7. The Commission or Board may ask questions at any time during the proceeding. 8. The Commission or Board will commence deliberations and render a decision. D. Basis of Decision. All decisions shall be based on the evidence presented at the hearing on the case, which shall include the agenda materials, minutes, the entire project file, testimony presented, and other evidence presented. Strict rules of evidence shall not apply, but evidence must be relevant to the issues before the Commission or the Board. 5. Cross-examination. A. Persons to be Cross-Examined. The City Staff, the Applicant, Parties, their respective witnesses and Citizen Participants are subject to cross- examination as set forth herein. 4 B. Cross-Examination Guidelines. 1. Citizen Participants are subject to cross-examination by the Mayor or Board Chair only. In the event of an absence of the Mayor or Board Chair, the term Mayor or Board Chair shall be deemed to include the person authorized to run the meeting-in their absence. If the Staff, the Applicant, or Parties desire to have the Mayor or Board Chair cross examine a Citizen Participant, they shall, whenever possible, present written cross-examination questions to the Mayor or Board Chair prior to the commencement of the cross- examination. The Mayor or Board Chair shall first ask the cross- examination questions submitted by Staff, then the Applicant, and finally the Parties based on who submitted a request and became a Party first. The Staff, Applicant, and any Parties' cross-examination through the Mayor or Board Chair is limited to two (2) minutes per Citizen Participant. 2. Only the City Staff, the Applicant, or a Party may cross-examine non-Citizen Participant witnesses. 3. Cross-examination by City Staff, the Applicant, or a Party shall be limited to two (2) minutes per witness each. • 4. The Commission or Board is not limited to two (2) minutes and may ask questions of anyone who testifies at any time during the proceedings. C. Relevancy. All relevant evidence shall be accepted. D. Scope. The scope of the cross-examination shall be limited to the facts alleged by the person testifying in relation to the application. E. Good Faith Questions. The cross-examination shall not be designed to merely harass, intimidate, or embarrass the person testifying. F. Power to Halt Cross Examination. The Mayor or Board Chair shall determine whether the question and evidence is relevant and the proper scope of cross-examination. In the absence of the Mayor or Board Chair, the term Mayor or Board Chair shall be deemed to include the person authorized to run the meeting in their absence. The Mayor or Board Chair may defer to the City Attorney (or Assistant City Attorney) to determine the relevancy of the question and the evidence and the proper scope of the cross-examination. The person conducting the cross-examination may be stopped from pursuing a line of questioning, if the questioning is on an issue that is not relevant, the scope of proper cross examination is exceeded, or the cross-examination is conducted in a manner that is designed to harass, intimidate, or embarrass the person being cross- examined. If a person conducting the cross-examination continues to 5 pursue improper lines of questioning, the Mayor or Board Chair may halt the cross-examination. 6. Applicability. These rules only apply to proceedings and hearings that are quasi-judicial in nature. These rules are applicable to the City Commission and any Board that does not have specific rules for the conduct of quasi-judicial proceedings. 6 SUMMARY OF QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING PROCEDURES Staff enters project file into the record. 1. Swear in Witnesses 2. Disclosure of Ex Parte Communications by Board Members 3. City Staff shall present case, including witnesses (max 20 min.) 4. Applicant shall present case, including witnesses (max 20 min.) 5. Other parties may present case, including witnesses (max 20 min.) if approved for party status 6. Public may speak for or against (max 3 minutes per person; unless person represents an organization or other group of people who are present and who yield their time to an individual person, then the maximum time shall be 6 minutes.) 7. Cross examination will be allowed after each witness. City staff, the Applicant and Parties shall be allowed to cross examine anyone who testified before the board for a period of 2 minutes per witness; However, if either City staff, the Applicant or Parties desire to cross examine a citizen participant it is only allowed through the Board Chair in accordance with the rules of the board. 8. The City staff, Applicant, and Parties may have 2 minutes for rebuttal. This sheet is just a summary of the rules of procedure for quasi-judicial hearings and is not inclusive of all the requirements for quasi-judicial hearings. Tne Rules for the Board or, if the Board has not adopted rules,the Rules of the City Commission shall govern all quasi-judicial hearings. • Yy 4% . u :Wier o� ` *-- `, - -1�.. - - - Lam---._ * * * * * * *4- MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY 3 *Downtown Master Plan 2 z �� 4 5 Implementation CITY COMMISSION Committee Regular-6:00 pm -,, `�t :;:; /� t•,:,,, 4JE ' 11:00 am Commission Chambers 'A 'I Old School Square �y INDEPENDENCE DA + +'L City Hall closed It 8 9 10 1 i1— --31k- L yl� s : Delray Housing Authority West Atlantic Redevelopment f 8:I5 am -770 SW!2`''Terrace Coalition Board-5:30 pm Joint Venture Education Board Sister Cities-8:30 am 104 West Atlantic Avenue 8:00 am $�`t Chamber of Commerce -6:00 m , .1 * °'' I. 5:30 pm Code Enforcement Board * 1 Chamber of Commerce 1 First Floor Conf. Room Commission Gtambers 1; ti1:30 pm/Chambers * S.P.R.A.B.-6:30 pm C.R.A.-6:00 pm /t CITY COMMISSION Workshop-6:00 pm First Floor Conference Room !04 West Atlantic Avenue J 'a • First Floor Conference Room * Note changes in meeting rooms 15 16 17 18 l� ,n. Downtown Development Authority— 12:00 noon Presentation for Planning&Zoning Board CITY COMMISSION Chamber of Commerce City Retirees' ir 6:00 pm Regular-6:00 pm Board of Construction Appeals Financial Planning Commission Chambers Commission Chamber 5:00 pm 6:00 pm Chambers Commission Chambers Commission Chu,uh�r s Historie' 'i'eser'vation Board 0 6:00 pm First Floor Conference Room 22 23 24 25 2 0 Code Enforcement Board In1�. �, Nuisance Abatement 1:30 pm Site Plan Review& C.R.A. AnwicaCitY v''`o Board-3:00 pm Commission Chambers Appearance Board 6:00 pm 1 I I i, 2 Commission Chambers Parking Management Advisory 6:00 pm 104 West Atlantic Avenue Committee-5:30 pm Commission Chambers 2001 I First Floor Conference Room µ^ 29 30 31 _ * ---,..ain \111 Presentation for City Retirees' Financial Planning NOTE: Some meeting dates, times and -.vow 6:00 pm locations may be subject to change. Commission Chambers ____*