Loading...
HPB-08-07-02 8/7/02 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: AUGUST 7, 2002 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:01 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gloria Elliott, Gail Lee McDermott, Jim Keavney, Rhonda Sexton MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Branning, Donnamarie Sloan STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Loretta Heussi, Terrill Pyburn II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes for the Public Hearings/Regular Meetings were before the Board for consideration. Ms. McDermott made a motion to approve the Minutes for June 5, 2003, June 19, 2002, July 17, 2002 as written. The motion was seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 5-0. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS At this time the Chairperson read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. Ms. Heussi swore in all witnesses wishing to speak at the hearing. A. Gorndt Residence, 117 NE 7 Street, Del-Ida Park, Gary Eliopoulos, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is consideration of a variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the side interior setback from 10' to 4' for the installation of a pool located at 117 NE 7th Street, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(A). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. Ms. Shay entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. Staff did not support granting the variance based on the high density on the property and the close proximity to the neighboring property. Gary Eliopoulos (architect) was present to represent the project. Mr. Eliopoulos presented photographs of the site and agreed that the space is limited but that the property will accommodate a pool. The proposed lap pool is very small and will not negatively impact the neighborhood. Ms. Shay re-iterated her previous objection that the addition of the pool would impact the neighbors and that the property would be overdeveloped with both a pool and the existing garage. Ms. McDermott stated that she could support the pool but that perhaps an alternative location would be better. Ms. Shay noted that those affected within a 500' radius were notified. Mr. Keavney supported the increase of density on the property. Ms. Jamison felt the pool would be too close to the neighbors and the noise would be a problem. After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Keavney, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 3-2 (Elliott and Jamison dissenting) to approve the variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the side interior building setback from 10' to 4' for an existing contributing structure located at 117 NE 7th Street, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(J). The motion was amended to include positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5) by Mr. Keavney and seconded by Ms. Elliott. B. Vintage Rose, 102 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Tamelyn Sickle, Owner. Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. Ms. Jamison spoke with various members of the public regarding the history of the property. -2- HPB Minutes 8/7/02 Action Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of approval of a COA associated with a Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements for the Vintage Rose, 102 NE 1st Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F). Ms. Shay entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. Ms. Tamelyn Sickle (owner) and Mr. Gregory Miklos (architect) were present to represent the project. Ms. Sickle passed around pictures of the original home and stated that she is restoring the home and taking it back to its original appearance. Mr. Miklos stated he had no problem with the conditions of approval other than the installation of two sets of shutters on the rear of the building. Ms. Shay stated that the Pineapple Grove Design Review Committee and the Community Redevelopment Agency both felt the elevations were fairly plain and as they would both be viewed from the right-of-way should have shutters on both elevations. Ms. Shay requested of the Board to either remove all the shutters or retain the set of shutters rather than supporting the installation of just one shutter on a window opening. Ms. Jamison inquired about the necessity of an elevator. Ms. Shay stated that it was unnecessary for this building per the Building Code and that the requirement was waived by the State based on the nature of the historic property. Mr. Keavney inquired about an accessibility slope for the first floor entrance. Ms. Shay stated that the walkway to the south entrance will be sloped for access. The Board requested the installation of shutter dogs. -3- HPB Minutes 8/7/02 Demolition After much discussion, it was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 5-0 to approve the demolition of the one- story extension, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1) for the subject property located at 102 NE 1st Avenue, The Vintage Rose. Class V Site Plan It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. McDermottt and passed 5-0 to approve the COA for the Class V site plan for the Vintage Rose, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Sections 2.4.5(G)(5) and 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That decorative site lighting fixture details and that a photometric plan be provided and that the lighting locations be indicated on the landscape plans with staff approval. 3) The back out area for the handicapped space in the parking area must be a total of 6'. Landscape Plan It was moved by Mr. Keavney, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 5-0 to approve the COA for the landscape plan for Vintage Rose, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following conditions: 1) Indicate the location of the A/C unit, refuse container, and bike rack on the landscape plan. 2) Climbing plants such as Bougainvillea located near the building must be maintained and should not be permitted to grow onto the structure. (Landscaping attached to the building can cause moisture to be trapped in the historic building fabric and can cause irreparable damage). 3) The landscape plan must be certified by a qualified landscape architect. -4- HPB Minutes 8/7/02 4) The landscape plan must indicate the spacing for all proposed plantings including planting details. 5) Where any commercial area abuts properties in residential use, one tree shall be planted every twenty-five feet including in the perimeter landscape strip north of the driveway. 6) Tree species shall be a minimum of 12' in overall height at time of planting, with a minimum 4' of single straight trunk with 6' of clear trunk and 6' of spread canopy. 7) That refuse container and A/C screening shall be indicated on the landscape plans. Design Elements It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 5-0 to approve the COA for the design elements for Vintage Rose, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1 and 4.6.18, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the design elements for the rehabilitation of the extant historic structures be developed in line with the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 2) That decorative shutters be added to the west and north elevations of the building to match the extant shutters on the east elevation. All shutters are to be mounted to appear operable and include shutter dogs. 3) Any in-kind replacement for the cosmetic improvements to the existing historic building fabric must be indicated on the elevations. C. Villa Abrigo, 248 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Jim &Wendy Nolan, Owners. Action Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a one-story addition and change of paint colors, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. -5- HPB Minutes 8/7/02 Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the item to the Board. Jim Curry, from Curry Partnership, was present to represent the project. Mr. Curry stated that the kitchen is being expanded and the exterior will match that on the existing house and will lie within the required setbacks. Ms. Shay asked Mr. Curry if the stucco would be rough or smooth textured because the building has both. Mr. Curry stated the stucco would be rough textured. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness request for a one-story addition and change of paint colors to a contributing residence at 248 NE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with • respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. D. Caribe Café, 814 & 816 East Atlantic Avenue, Marina Historic District, Jeff Falconer & Mike Weston, Owners. Action Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of vinyl signs for the Caribe Cafe, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. Ms. Elliott met the owners during a site visit. Ms. Shay entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. Mr. Falconer and Mr. Weston were present to represent the project. After much discussion, it was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 5-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of three vinyl signs for the Caribe Cafe, 814 & 816 East Atlantic Avenue based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b) and -6- HPB Minutes 8/7/02 (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. E. Skinner Dental Office, 703 NE 3rd Avenue, Del-Ida Historic District, Iraj Skinner, Owner. Action Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of hurricane panels pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex-parte communications on this item. There were none. Ms. Shay entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. It was moved by Ms. Elliott, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of storm panels on a contributing building located at 703 NE 3rd Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards with the following condition: 1) That the tracks or channels be painted to match the exterior of the building. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: Cecil Jamison inquired about the installation of the sidewalks in Del -Ida Park. Ms. Shay stated that the Engineering Department would install sidewalks beginning in January. Report from Historic District Representatives: None B. Board Members: Ms. Jamison inquired about the meeting for Osceola Park. Ms. McDermott was uncertain as to the date. -7- HPB Minutes 8/7/02 Ms. Jamison inquired about designating Atlantic Avenue. Ms. Shay stated that she will inquire about the project. Ms. Elliott inquired about the status of Mariposa. Ms. Shay stated that the conditions mandated by the Site Plan approval have not been met. Ms. Jamison about the status of the guidelines. Ms. Shay reported that no one has been chosen from the request for proposal and that inconsistencies in the budget must first be resolved. Ms. Shay also described the need for a de-listing process. C. Staff: Ms. Pyburn described ex-parte communication in greater detail. Ms. Shay stated that next meeting will be Ms. Sloan's last meeting as a Board Member and Francisco Perez will be taking her place. Ms. Shay discussed the option of conservation districts. Ms. Shay reviewed the recommendations from Phase II of the survey. V. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:00 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for August 7, 2002, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on June 18, 2003. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -8- HPB Minutes 8/7/02 0.0 .4y - AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: August 7, 2002 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • June 5, 2002 • June 19, 2002 • July 17, 2002 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Gorndt Residence, 117 NE 17 Street, Del-Ida Park, Gary Eliopoulos, Authorized Agent. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a pool and consideration of a variance to reduce the side interior setback. B. Vintage Rose, 102 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Tamelyn Sickle, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class V Site Plan Modification for the conversion of a two-story contributing building to retail. C. Villa Abrigo, 248 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Jim & Wendy Nolan, Owners. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for an addition to a contributing building. D. Caribe Café, 814 & 816 East Atlantic Avenue, Marina Historic District, Jeff Falconer & Mike Weston, Owners. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of vinyl signs. HPB Meeting August 7,2002 Page 2 E. Skinner Dental Office, 703 NE 3rd Avenue, Del-Ida Historic District, Iraj Skinner, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of storm panels. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff V. ADJOURN Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: August 2, 2002 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: July 17, 2002 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott, Donnamarie Sloan, James Keavney, William Branning, Rhonda Sexton (arrived at 6:05) MEMBER ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Debra Garcia, Brian Shutt, and Terrill Pyburn II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of October 3, 2001 were before the Board for consideration. Ms. McDermott moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Sloan and passed 4-0-2 with Mr. Branning and Mr. Keavney abstaining as they were not on the Board at that time. At this point in the Meeting Ms. Sexton arrived. III. SPECIAL DISCUSSION ITEM: A. Quasi-Judicial Hearing Proceedings Bryan Shutt and Terrill Pyburn, Assistant City Attorneys for Delray Beach addressed the Board pertaining to Quasi-Judicial Hearings. Mr. Shutt handed out an instruction sheet pertaining to Quasi-Judicial Hearings and allowed the Board to ask questions pertaining to the new requirements. It was noted that this requires all future reviews by the HPB to conform to the Quasi-Judicial Proceedings. After much discussion between the Board, Staff, and the Assistant City Attorneys. It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Sexton, and passed 7-0 to accept the rules of Quasi-Judicial Hearing Proceedings, as they have been amended. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. Crocker Residence, 105 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park , Kathleen Crocker, Owner. At this point in the meeting, Ms. Garcia swore in all applicants who intended to give testimony pertaining to this particular project. Mr. Branning disclosed that he had a prior meeting with Francisco Perez on another matter but there was no discussion pertaining to this project. Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is to approve Part I of the construction application for an ad valorum tax exemption for improvements to a contributing historic property. Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report. Francisco Perez, Authorized Agent, then addressed the Board. Mr. Keavney asked that the material for the risers on the porch steps be addressed as it was a previous condition of approval. Ms. Crocker stated that Chicago brick is being used. Ms. Jamison, then opened the discussion to the public. No public was present. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. McDermott, and passed 7-0 to approve Part 1 of the construction application, COA 2002-278, for an ad valorem tax exemption for improvements to the property at 105 NE 7th Street, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(M)(5)(b). V. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. Replacement of Windows Ms. Shay addressed the Board asking for guidance pertaining to the type of windows being installed in historic buildings. A recent approval required that there be vinyl clad, wood core windows on the front façade (or any elevation seen from the right-of-way when it is a corner lot) with aluminum framed windows installed on the remainder of the elevations (as required on Banker's Row) however, no defined policy regarding fenestration was established. As the replacement of windows is reviewed administratively, staff was looking to the Board for some direction to establish a policy. The -2- HPB Minutes 07/17/02 Board gave direction that the windows should be replaced according to what is existing (such as a majority of aluminum frame). However, if all the windows are being replaced, they must be all wood or all vinyl clad with wood core. VI. REPORT AND COMMENTS: A. Public Comments No Public Comments B. Report from Historic District Representatives No Reports C. Board Members Ms. Jamison addressed staff regarding the status of the accessory structure at 610 N. Ocean Boulevard. Ms. Shay assured the Board that there has been contact with Ms. Henderson (the applicant's attorney) and that the plans would be in as soon as possible. Difficulties with the architect has kept the plans from being submitted. Mr. Branning was asking about the Colony Hotel approval for bronze windows. Ms. Shay is to check to make sure the Colony's use of bronze on the windows was approved by the HPB. Ms. Elliott inquired about the status of Mariposa (48 SE 1st Avenue) and Winston Condos (137 S. Swinton Avenue). Mariposa had not previously met their conditions of approval by the Board for the site plan and they are currently working with Scott Pape, project planner, to resolve the outstanding issues. Winston Condos has begun their site plan modifications as approved by the HPB. Ms. Jamison inquired about the fence at the corner of east 2nd and 5th (201 NE 5th Court). The owner had painted the fence red, white and blue. Ms. Shay assured the Board that code enforcement will be informed. Ms. Sloan stepped down from the Board to bring a awning color before the Board Ms. Sloan presented fabric samples for a color change for previously approved awnings for her property at 106 SE 7th Avenue, also known as Sloan Hammock. The previously approved canopy color was not available as it was actually not canopy material but upholstery material. Ms. Sloan then presented the closest color to the original color scheme to seek compliance with the original Board approved color scheme. It was moved -3- HPB Minutes 07/17/02 by Mr. Branning, seconded by Mr. Keavney, and passed 6-0 that the awning color be deferred to staff for administrative review and approval. At this point in the meeting, Ms. Sloan then rejoined the Board. D. Staff Ms. Shay reported back to the Board concerning the Fine Building. Ms. Jamison had questions pertaining to sidewalk improvements in that area. Mr. Krejcarek, City Engineer, conveyed to Ms. Shay that the Seacrest/Del Ida Improvements beginning in January 2003 will include the sidewalks around the Fine Building. Ms. Shay then informed the Board that October is Heritage Month. She is attempting to organize a lecture series regarding the City's heritage at the Delray Beach Library and encouraged Board members to attend. Ms. Shay is also starting a quarterly Historic Preservation Newsletter. She also asked if the Board could suggest a title for the Newsletter and she requested that perhaps each quarter one Board Member (starting with the Board Chair) write a small article for the publication representing the latest happenings of the HPB. VII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:15 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for July 17, 2002, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on August 7, 2002. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -4- HPB Minutes 07/17/02 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: June 19, 2002 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott, Gloria Elliott, Donnamarie Sloan, James Keavney, William Branning, Rhonda Sexton MEMBER ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, and Loretta Heussi, Brian Shutt II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Branning made the motion to amend the agenda to remove the approval of the minutes of October 3, 2001 due to the fact that they were not ready for review. Ms. Lee-McDermott seconded and the motion passed 7- 0. The Minutes for the Regular Meetings of October 17, 2001 and April 17, 2002 were before the Board for consideration. Ms. McDermott moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 6-0- 1 with Mr. Branning abstaining (he was not on the Board at that time). III. PUBLIC HEARING: A. O'Neal House, 910 NE 2nd Avenue, Starr Brigante, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is to recommend to the City Commission, the listing of the 910 NE 2nd Avenue as an Individually Listed Property in the Local Register of Historic Places, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C). Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report. The floor was then opened up for public discussion. Scott Christian spoke on behalf of the Seacrest Neighborhood and was in support of the historic designation. Russell Green (previous owner) also spoke in favor of the designation. After Board discussion, it was moved by Ms. Elliott, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to recommend approval to the City Commission that the residence and associated property at 910 NE 2nd Avenue be listed in the Local Register of Historic Places, less the 25' of lot 27 based upon positive findings, with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1 (B)(2)(a) & 4.5.1(B)(3)(a) and (b). Jim Keavney stepped down. B. Fontaine Fox Historic Site, 615 N. Ocean Boulevard, Individually Designated Property, Richard Edick and Georganne Goldblum, Owners, Jim Keavney, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is recommend to the City Commission approval of an amendment to Ordinance 70-89 that established the Fontaine Fox House Historic Site Designation to allow the enclosure of a 250 ft. porch and a COA request for the installation of new impact resistant windows and doors and a spiral staircase, pursuant to LDR Sections 4.5.1(B), 4.5.1 (E), and 4.5.1(K)(2). Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report and presented letters from neighbor's supporting the request. Richard Edick addressed the Board to further explain the renovations to the building. Jim Keavney spoke to the Board and reminded them that this was a rather new dwelling (constructed in 1992) with no historic value. The new spiral staircase on the front façade will be behind the heavily landscaped yard and therefore not visible from the right-of-way. It was noted by Mr. Edick and staff that the previous owner had attempted to enclose the porch through the amendment of Ordinance 70-89 and the 2,400 sq. ft restriction. However, the request was denied at the City Commission level due to the adjacent (northern) neighbor's objections. As there are no objections by the current neighbors and considering the footprint of the building was not going to be altered as previously suggested there should be no such conflict with this project. Ms. Jamison then read into record letters of support of the project submitted by neighbors Paul Cusson and Monty Helm. She then closed the public hearing and turned the floor over to the Board. It was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 6-0-1 (Jim Keavney abstaining) to recommend approval to the City Commission to amend Ordinance #70-89 for the dwelling at 615 N. Ocean Boulevard, the Fontaine Fox House Historic Site, based on positive -2- HPB Minutes 06/19/02 findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(B), (E)(7), (E)(8), (E)(8)(c), (E)(8)(f), and (E)(8)(j) and LDR 4.5.1(K)(2), the Design Guidelines, Objective C-1 of the Coastal Management Element in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. It was then moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 6-0-1 (Keavney abstaining) to approve 2002-204-COA for the installation of impact resistant windows and doors and a spiral staircase at 615 N. Ocean Blvd, the Fontaine Fox House Historic Site, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(B), (E)(7), (E)(8), (E)(8)(c), (E)(8)(f), and (E)(8)(j) and LDR 4.5.1(K)(2), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, Objective C-1 of the Coastal Management Element in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. At this point in the meeting, Jim Keavney returned to the Board. C. Susan Williams House, 154 NW 5th Avenue, Individually Designated Property, City of Delray Beach, Owner. Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is recommend the approval to the City Commission to amend Ordinance 9-95 to replace the property description and address from 30 NW 3rd Avenue to 154 NW 5th Avenue. The individual historic designation will remain. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report. Diane Dominguez, Director of the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) was in attendance to address any Board questions. Ms. Jamison opened the floor for public comments; none were made. It was moved by Ms. Sloan, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to recommend to the City Commission approval of the amendment to Ordinance 9-95 to alter the property description and address based on positive findings affecting 154 NW 5th Avenue, Susan Williams House based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (B) and (K)(2) and the Design Guidelines. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Anchorage Condo Building, 60 Marine Way, Marina Historic District, John DeNiro, Owner. -3- HPB Minutes 06/19/02 Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is the consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the addition of awnings on south and east elevations of the building. Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report. It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Mr. Keavney and passed 7-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness request to install new awnings on the south and east façades of the contributing structure, Anchorage Condo Building, 60 Marine Way, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), subject to the following condition: 1) That the new awnings have the same scalloped edge as the existing lower awnings. B. Masonic Lodge, 40-44 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Michael Weiner, Authorized Agent Item Before the Board: The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the design elements associated with a Class I site plan modification for the alteration of the north and east elevations of the Masonic Building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Shay presented the item to the Board through the review of the staff report. There was considerable Board discussion regarding the original "historic" look of the building. Ms. Shay supported the Staff position that a window wall be installed rather than fixed doors (as the proposed previous plan showed the installation of retractable doors). If the new doors were to be fixed, then a window wall to match the existing walls should be installed. Michael Weiner then addressed the Board, representing the owner, explaining the reasoning behind the changes to the building. The Board then continued with extensive discussion of the proposal. It was moved by Mr. Branning and seconded by Mr. Keavney to approved 4-3 to approve the COA-465 for the associated elevation changes to the Masonic Lodge, with the following conditions: 1) That the stucco exterior at the base of the windows on the north elevation be retained and that fixed windows be installed to mirror the window wall west of the proposed door system. -4- HPB Minutes 06/19/02 V. REPORT AND COMMENTS: A. Public Comments No Public Comments B. Report from Historic District Representatives No Reports C. Board Members Ms. Jamison inquired about the sidewalk requirements on the Fine Building. Ms. Shay assured the Chair that she would look into the issue and report back at the next Board meeting. D. Staff Brian Shutt, Assistant City Attorney, addressed the Board discussing "Quasi-Judicial Hearings" and the Rules and Regulations for the City of Delray Beach Historic Preservation Board. Ms. Shay mentioned to the Board that she had been discussing a system to expedite procedures when processing waivers or variances regarding historic buildings in need of re-location due to the danger of being razed. Ms. Shay informed everyone that she is moving forward with a PSIQ for the listing of the Spady House in the National Register of Historic Places. VI. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:30 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for June 19, 2002, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on August 7, 2002. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -5- HPB Minutes 06/19/02 DELBAI'BEACH DEU1AI'BEACH All- icaCity HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Eigid (IIP. MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT (II1- 1993 200I '_001 1993 Agent: Jim & Wendy Nolan, Owners Project Name: Nolan Residence Location: 248 NE 1st Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the addition of a one-story addition and change of paint colors, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property, also known as Villa Abrigo, consists of Lot 9 and the north 25' of Lot 10, Block 66 in the Town of Delray on Banker's Row. The residence is a 2,222 sq. ft. two-story frame dwelling, constructed in the Mediterranean-Revival style in 1926 with a detached 513 sq. ft. one-story guest cottage, also constructed in the Mediterranean- Revival style in 1926, located at the rear of the property. The main dwelling displays a multi-plane roof that includes both one and two story extensions with both gable and flat roofs. The property is located on the west side of NE 1st Avenue between NE 2nd and NE 3rd Streets in the Old School Square Historic zoning district (OSSHAD). Both structures are considered contributing buildings in the district. PROJECT DESCRIPTION /ANALYSIS Project Description The development proposal is for the construction of a one-story addition located at the rear of the extant main dwelling to expand the kitchen and construct a new laundry area. The addition will be located between the porch and existing one-story kitchen. The proposal also includes altering the existing paint colors throughout the building. Designed with a textured stucco exterior to compliment the original building, the concrete block, one-story addition will be located on the northwest corner of the main residence and will include a bay window with barrel tile roof (in a half conical shape). A shed roof will be removed from the west elevation in order to accommodate the new roof line of the addition. A new shed overhang with matching barrel tile roof will be constructed and offset from the original location once the addition in complete. The new paint colors proposed are Montgomery White for the body and Winthrop Peach for the fascia, window frames, and columns. 248 NE 1st Avenue,Addition Old School Square Historic District Page 2 Design Elements Analysis: LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), (E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (E)(8)(d) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (a) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. (b) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (c) The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (d) The relationship of solids to voids in the front facade of a building or structure will be visually compatible with the front facades of historic buildings or structures within the districts. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states: 1) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 2) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would not be impaired. The addition is designed to expand the floor area to the rear of the extant building allowing for a larger kitchen and for the construction of a laundry area. The proposed project is sensitive to the design of the contributing building and its intended use as a residence and will not destroy the extant historic fabric of either main residence or guest cottage. As the one-story addition is proposed at the rear of the main residence, the addition will not be seen from the right-of-way, and it will be differentiated from the original structure with its bay window, concrete block construction, and textured stucco pattern following the recommendations of the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the 248 NE 1st Avenue,Addition Old School Square Historic District Page 3 Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the locations of additions to the rear of a contributing building and that the design is compatible with the scale and massing of the existing dwelling. The proposal is also compatible with the surrounding historic buildings of the district and Banker's Row and the design elements for the proposed addition will not diminish the contributing status of the main residence. The proposed paint colors are in keeping with the rich earth tones often found in Mediterranean-Revival style buildings and in buildings of the style throughout the neighborhood. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve 2002-300 for the construction of a one-story addition and change of paint colors to a contributing residence for 248 NE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8). C. Deny approval of 2002-300 for the construction of a one-story addition and change of paint colors to a contributing residence for 248 NE 1st Avenue, with the basis stated. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness request for a one-story addition and change of paint colors to a contributing residence at 248 NE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Attachments: Site Plan, Elevations Report Prepared by:Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner MW 0ifR � --"re":-....36i$LiMi3NnM.MiiiMMi n.,...... _y �`� 5.22.2• MYW.Wti O, .iYYt= u.U:t, Y N I,G. '""!34Yy — �_ - �- .r3/Wr."""r"""5.. . Rebntac nr A- Y... \14 PPri %-r-OCT.; !! p� �- - - wrAIW.411‘7.7 .t in Wt• It In IN I* JewrliEtal 1_�•. .�� t y ..,-......4" .w .w,,,,e».:ys .e.a�n.win u.► ,wd' .bus • ' ,,„ n n —� +♦ ♦ le,„,,, -,,,, ,___`� I`i +� �II� M� lir' Tithil � q 111 ��♦,!. as x„m ♦. ' �1 _ lv,-,. - m 1� �A. 1 1� 1' "nrm 1 1, ♦, Ii I �.-� I�� R�d'rr J .� _._— _ 11 ��� i v. . ""mo • +.......m.w i L wr IT1H ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 1 NO WI W e Na AN 1 ADDMoN LEGEND, 1 w±an.cei c+...0 w a ✓ �s. ..o....'..< — _\ lamosmen M1 ,< .{Xxi £KIBt ItJG Y1 1.]9tGY d ...n.w 7 .ralpe "ER /, 4 <<I JIII1 • h e WI 17--- -or- . ..,;. 11 PP jr Y _ �i� i , acMwl 1 .,,,,,:{r. 1v I2-1 ♦ �1 1h .d • _ ,MO"". -- L ill 1 I ®111 ELEVATloNs/ 1�♦♦ ��. ♦ Bit PARTW.FLOM ♦► ��. 5�A .• _ SITE Pl1W ® xu5'�°� PUuA .W errE_ PDTi �. 9 2 ,III $ CCAl10uNa AP ". A1.00 2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: August 7, 2002 AGENDA ITEM: Ill. B. ITEM: Vintage Rose, 102 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District—Consider a • Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class V Site Plan Modification for the conversion of a two-story contributing building to retail. CASON METHODIST CHURCH • --> > GENERAL DATA: -- -NE N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. _3RD ST. Owner/Applicant Tamelyn Sickle — Agent Gregory Miklos — Location Northwest corner of - — CITY Northeast 1st Street and ATTORNEY w- N Northeast 1st Avenue. BUILDING 1 Property Size 0.254 Acres 1 UARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DR. N.E. 2ND ST Future Land Use Map OMU (Other Mixed Use) Wurrent Zoning OSSHAD (Old School _ _ = Square Historic Arts District) W —:— Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD (Old School = —W— Square Historic Arts District) CITY W —¢— HALL East: OSSHAD (Old School > Square Historic Arts District) N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST "-ST. South: OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) .— West: OSSHAD (Old School COMMUNITYCENTER Z 0 Square Historic Arts District) Existing Land Use Single Family Residence OLD SCHOOL ' Proposed Land Use Covert existing residence SQUARE I to retail, with the ATLANTIC AVENUE addition of a parking lot. N Water Service Existing on site. Z Sewer Service Existing on site. o — 3 Z _ /1' S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. 1111 11 1 :. ' W I I � � `- ■■ S.W. 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND ST. III. B. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for the Vintage Rose, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class V Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; and ❑ Design Elements. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of NE 1st Avenue and NE 1st Street. BACKGROUND The subject property contains a frame vernacular, single family home located on the south 11.5' of Lot 15 and all of Lot 16, Block 67, Town of Delray in the Old School Square Historic zoning district. The two-story, contributing historic structure, located at 102 NE 1st Avenue, was constructed in 1939 and retains its historic integrity. A site plan approval request has been submitted to convert the structure from residential to commercial use, which is now before the Board for action. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal includes the following: o Conversion of the contributing historic residential structure into a retail use; o Construction of an asphalt parking lot with nine (9) standard spaces and one (1) handicapped accessible space; o Installation of brick footpaths leading from the parking area to the south elevation/entrance with a brick patio area on the west elevation; o Demolition of a one story, flat roof(non-contributing) extension on the south elevation o Installation of landscaping throughout the site and refuse storage areas. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the OSSHAD zone district: HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 2 Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 27' Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 25' 29'7" Side (Interior) 7.5' 3'* Side (Street) 15' 20.6' Rear 10' 65.4' Open Space 25% 42.7% * Existing non-conforming building subject to provisions of LDR Section 1.3.4. Parking LDR Section 4.4.24 (OSSHAD-Special District Regulation): Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a) all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. This requirement may be reduced to one space per 400 sq. ft. of total floor area, or by at least one space, where there is a mix of residential and non-residential use in the same structure. Proposed parking is located at the rear (west) of the property, behind the existing structure. The building will contain retail on the first and second floors for a total of 2,915 sq. ft. including the square footage for the garage/storage. Based on the retail use at one per 300 sq. ft., a total of 10 spaces are required and 9 spaces plus one handicapped space have been provided. An existing drive is located in front of the garage on NE 1st Avenue. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24 (G)(3), no parking is permitted beyond the front elevation of a building within the OSSHAD. A gate is currently proposed (as indicated on the site plan) for use in the front drive. The materials and dimensions must be indicated on the site plan. Also, in order to ensure that patrons and service vehicles utilize the proposed parking facility in the rear, the applicant must provide signage relating the restriction of the front driveway as a "no parking or loading zone". The gate and signage have been attached as conditions of approval. Right-of-Way Dedication In order to meet the 25' right-of-way dedication (1/2 of the 50' total) requirement for NE 1st Avenue, an additional 5' right-of-way dedication must be provided. This has been noted on the engineering plan. Provision of a special instrument which is to be recorded in the public records is attached as a condition of approval. HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 3 Traffic Statement Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(K)(3), a traffic statement shall be submitted as part of the development application when the development is located within the Traffic Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA). A traffic statement has not been submitted and has been added as a condition of approval. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Site Lighting Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting is required on site for new development proposals. A photometric plan must be submitted to ensure that requirements are met as outlined in LDR Section 4.6.8. Site lighting locations have been provided on the site plan, however they have not been provided on the landscape and engineering plans, and the photometric plan and fixture details have not been provided. Lighting locations must be indicated on the landscape and engineering plans, and photometric plan and fixture details provided. These are attached as conditions of approval. Bike Rack Pursuant to LDR 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided at any non- residential use within the City's TCEA (Transportation Concurrency Exception Area) which, through the development review process, is determined to generate a demand. In addition, Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan requires bicycle facilities on all new development and redevelopment with particular emphasis on development within the TCEA. A bike rack is indicated on the plans. Sidewalks Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-way adjacent to the property. Existing 5' sidewalks currently run along both NE 1st Street and NE 1st Avenue. An internal brick paver walkway system will be constructed from the parking area (to the west) leading to the main entrance on the south side of the property (along N E 1 st Street). Refuse Container Area The refuse container will have a concrete block enclosure and metal gates. A 6' concrete block wall with aluminum panel gates has been proposed to screen the refuse enclosure located at the northwest corner of the property with access off the alley. RELATED ITEMS Technical Items The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 4 1) Engineering and landscape plans are inconsistent with the site plan regarding location of the A/C unit, site lighting, bike rack, and refuse containers. Revise accordingly. All plans must be consistent with one another. 2) That a photometric plan and decorative lighting detail be submitted prior to approval of the site plan. 3) That a traffic statement be submitted that accurately calculates the vehicular trips generated from the conversions from residential to commercial. 4) Proposed signage is indicated on the site plan and elevations. All signage must be brought back before the Board with full specs for approval. 5) A 5' right-of-way dedication will be provided along NE 1st Avenue. The dedication should be noted on the site plan to be consistent with the engineering plan and recorded. 6) A gate is indicated on the site plan in front of the existing drive. The gate materials and dimensions must be provided. Also,signage must be provided indicating the restriction of the front driveway as a no parking or loading zone. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS There are several existing trees that will be incorporated into the new landscape plan including: two Banyan Trees, a Gumbo Limbo, Mango and Jacaranda Trees which are interspersed throughout the property. The proposed new landscaping consists of: Christmas Palms, Bromeliads, Black Magic Ti, Gumbo Limbos, Bougainvillea Spec, Silver Buttonwood, Ficus Benjimina, Gardenia Jasmanoid, Heliconia Rostrata "Lobster Claw", Podocarpus Maki, and Poni Tail. Underplantings will consist of Arbicola "trinette", Dwarf Rosie, Rose Bush, Ground Orchid, Thryallis, Wort Fern, and Pentas Lanceolata with a Cocoplum and Dwarf Fire Bush hedge running along the perimeter of the property. Hibiscus Rosa Simensis "Ruth Wilcox" will line the building on the east elevation. The landscaping is concentrated along the east and south elevations with perimeter landscaping on the west (alley) and north property lines. The proposed landscaping complies with the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16. Refuse Container Area The proposal includes the installation of an individual roll out cart trash/refuse container area at the northwest corner of the property with access off the alley. The plans indicate that the trash container will be enclosed by a 6' concrete block wall with a double panel metal access gate. HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose- Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 5 DEMOLITION FINDINGS Demolition As part of this development proposal, demolition of the extension on the south elevation is proposed. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), The HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing in the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. The one-story, flat roof extension slated for demolition was not part of the original footprint of the structure and was a poor addition to the building as it is asymmetrical to the original footprint. Constructed of non-historic building fabric including siding and modern awning windows, the addition is structurally unsound, infested with termites and contains rotting wood. A two-story wood porch with turned post detailing will be constructed in its place. The immediate demolition of the non-contributing flat roof extension will not be detrimental to the contributing status of the building or the district. The extension may be demolished without altering the historical or architectural context of the main dwelling within the neighborhood and will aid in the restoration of the building to reflect its original footprint. DESIGN ELEMENTS Residential Conversion to Commercial The proposal includes conversion of a contributing, two-story residential structure to commercial (retail) use. The frame vernacular structure is approximately 2,915 sq. ft. and is located on lots 15 and 16, Block 67. The building will be restored based on its original vernacular footprint except for the retention of the garage. A one-story, non-contributing, flat roof extension on the south elevation will be demolished in order to provide room for a two-story porch and entryway. HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 6 The two-story, frame dwelling was constructed in 1939 and displays original detailing such as wood clapboard siding and side facing gable roof. Some of the original 6/6 wood frame windows remain in the house and will be retained where feasible. A one-story garage and flat roof extension extend on the north and south elevations respectively. The dwelling suffers from severe deterioration (wood rot and decay) and neglect. Cosmetic repairs for the in-kind replacement of the deteriorated wood is already underway. All such repairs should be indicated on the site plan. This has been attached as a condition of approval. A picket fence is proposed to run along NE 1st Avenue and NE 1st Street and continue to the north property line along the alley. The fence will stand 3' in height with a 5" cap set at each 8' length of fence. The fence will have a blunt, arched tip and be painted white to compliment the historic building. Design Elements Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(8), (E)(8)(d), (E)(g) and (E)(4), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating alterations or additions of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: a) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. b) The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the opening exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. c) The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. d) The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with prevalent architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on historic sites, buildings, and structures within a district. e) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: 1) A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 7 2) The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 3) Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other building, shall not be undertaken. 4) Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 5) Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. 6) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The proposed rehabilitation includes the demolition of a one-story, non-contributing extension on the south elevation and the rehabilitation of the original wood framed dwelling. The extension will be replaced with a one-story porch with turned post detailing differentiating it from the original building but keeping with the historic nature of the vernacular architecture. No major exterior elevation changes are proposed. Exterior wood clapboards will be replaced on an as needed basis due to previous maintenance neglect and wood rot or termite damage. The original fenestration and salvageable historic fabric will remain. Where non-sensitive alterations have taken place, such as the use 1/1, aluminum frame windows, the owner will replace as necessary with the historically appropriate materials. However, such replacement will not occur at this time. The color palette proposed includes the use of pastel tones including Pink Tint for the body and Green Silk and Soft Antique White for the accent colors (such as trim, shutters, and door and window frames). This color scheme was chosen based on the color palette recommendations by the City and the CRA. Refuse Container Area The proposal includes the installation of an individual trash/refuse container area at the northwest corner of the property. The plans indicate that the roll-out carts will be enclosed by a metal panel gate for access off the alley. HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 8 REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Other Mixed Use (OMU) and a zoning designation of Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(B)(2), (3), and (6) within the OSSHAD zoning district, retail sales through specialty shops are listed as permitted uses. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A), Future Land Use Map Consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions) As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES As described in Objective A-10 of the Housing Element, the City shall support the conservation and rehabilitation of historically significant housing, especially where such housing is an identifying characteristic of a particular neighborhood. Further, Policy A-10.1 of the Housing Element supports this objective stating that the objective will be implemented in accordance with standards and criteria of Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations, Historic Preservation Sites and Districts. HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 9 Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings) Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is surrounded by the OSSHAD zoning district. The property is surrounded by a combination of public, commercial, and residential uses. Compatibility is not a concern, as the proposed use of the subject property would be allowable on each of the surrounding properties. The proposal retains the existing residential character while accommodating the adaptive re-use of the historic structure. The renovation of this building will enhance property values within the area. Based on the above, the development will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent properties. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency During the meeting of June 28, 2002, the CRA reviewed and approved the proposed plan with the following comment: 1) That shutters be installed on the north and west elevations to match the extant shutters of the east elevation. Pineapple Grove Design Review Group In June 2002, the Pineapple Grove Design Review Group made the following comments regarding the Vintage Rose Project: 1) That shutters should be added on the west elevation windows to match the existing; and 2) That the steps at the south entrance should be paired rather than separate. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves the demolition of a one-story, non-contributing extension and the conversion of a contributing, two-story, single family home to retail use including the integration of landscaping. No major exterior alterations are proposed for the building. The proposal will be consistent with LDR Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. There are several changes that are required and are attached as conditions of approval. The proposed elevation for the building to be converted complies with LDR Section 4.5.1 and 4.6.18, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines based upon the conditions as stated below. HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 10 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for the Vintage Rose based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4) and (E)(8), (E)(8)(d), (E)(g), the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Vintage Rose, based upon failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4) and (E)(8), (E)(8)(d), (E)(g), the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Demolition Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1) approve the demolition of the one- story extension on the subject property. Site Plan Modification Approve the COA for the Class V site plan for the Vintage Rose, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) and (Findings) and Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That decorative site lighting fixture details and that a photometric plan be provided and that the lighting locations be indicated on the landscape plans. 3) The back out area for the handicapped space in the parking area must be a total of 6'. Landscape Plan Approve the COA for the landscape plan for Vintage Rose, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following condition: 1) Indicate the location of the A/C unit, refuse container, and bike rack on the landscape plan. HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 11 2) Climbing plants such as Bougainvillea located near the building must be maintained and should not be permitted to grow onto the structure. (Landscaping attached to the building can cause moisture to be trapped in the historic building fabric and can cause irreparable damage). 3) The landscape plan must be certified by a qualified landscape architect. 4) The landscape plan must indicate the spacing for all proposed plantings including planting details. 5) Where any commercial area abuts properties in residential use, one tree shall be planted every twenty-five feet including in the perimeter landscape strip north of the driveway. 6) Tree species shall be a minimum of 12' in overall height at time of planting, with a minimum 4' of single straight trunk with 6' of clear trunk and 6' of spread canopy. 7) That refuse container and A/C screening shall be indicated on the landscape plans. Design Elements Approve the COA for the design elements for Vintage Rose, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1 and 4.6.18, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the design elements for the rehabilitation of the extant historic structures be developed in line with the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 2) That decorative shutters be added to the west and north elevations of the building to match the extant shutters on the east elevation. 3) Any in-kind replacement for the cosmetic improvements to the existing historic building fabric must be indicated on the elevations. Attachments: • Site Plan • Landscape Plan • Elevations • Survey Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 12 APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists via service lateral connections to the 8"water main on NE 1st Avenue. ❑ Sewer service exists via service lateral connections to an 8" sewer main in the north/south alley. ❑ Adequate fire suppression will be provided an existing fire hydrant on the south side of NE 1st Street adjacent to the Old School Square Complex, approximately 50'from the property. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build- out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standards. Drainage: A preliminary drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on- site via an exfiltration system. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD, and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Therefore, a traffic study is not required for concurrency purposes; however a traffic statement is necessary to keep a record of trips approved in the TCEA and for calculation of traffic impact fees. The applicant has not submitted a statement based upon the conversion from residential to retail. The statement must be submitted to accurately calculate the vehicular trips generated from the conversion from residential to retail, which has been attached as a condition of approval. Parks and Open Space: Park dedication requirements do not apply for nonresidential uses. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for a conversion of a single family dwelling to retail. Trash generation is based upon the worst case scenario of retail. Trash generated each year by the proposed 2,915 sq.ft. retail space is 18 tons [2,915 sq.ft. x 10.2 lbs/sq.ft. = 29,733 lbs/2,000 = 14.9 tons] for a total of 14.9 tons of solid waste per year. The trash generated by a single family home is 1.99 tons of solid waste per year resulting in an increase of roughly 13 tons per year. The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of service standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose- Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 13 APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent Will be met once a bike rack is provided C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent HPB Staff Report Vintage Rose-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 14 G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent Li > a Li > j— a a a — • _ . N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD N.E. 3RD ST. W a z > L.,a > J a IY r W— CITY 0 W ATTORNEY N N Lj LL o BUILDING Z — w I MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N F 2ND 1- o N a Z W Q] o a jilt! a 2— I :.. N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST /1ST ST. .,,_ R-5 • � COMMUNITY z z z CENTER - - TENNIS OLD _ STADIUM I I SCHOOL SQUARE I I Li Z T= ( 11111 ,,ATLANTIC AVENUE SOUTH . L`' I a [ COUNTY a _ COURT a .ZI I- _ HOUSE -0= < Ilil--MI Li mizri a 0 II wlElli Lzi S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. i a o N f LZI LJJ E h _ 5 U7 Ln Vl vi I N —www-- 102 NE 1ST AVENUE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM 632 ![AP! DMA)!EACH All•AdIB(iC3Cdp EI„•AlIBfIC2� HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD lIIi- MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT IiI, Agent: Eliopoulos Architecture, Inc. Project Name: Gorndt Residence Location: 117 NE 7th Street ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the side interior setback from 10' to 4' for the installation of a pool located at 117 NE 7th Street (Lot 12, Block 1, Del-Ida Park), pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(A). Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(D)(6), the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) shall act on all variance requests within an historic district or on a historic site, which otherwise would be acted upon by the Board of Adjustment. BACKGROUND The subject property (Lot 12, Block 1, Del-Ida Park) is located on the northwest corner of NE 2nd Avenue and NE 7th Street. The property is within the Del-Ida Park Historic District and is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). The property contains a 1,641 sq.ft. Minimal Traditional single family residence constructed in 1939 along with a recently constructed 425 sq. ft. garage, covered walkway, and open bricked patio. The applicant is currently seeking a variance to reduce the side interior setback from 10' to 4' for the construction of a pool. At its meeting on April 21, 1999, the Historic Preservation Board granted a variance to reduce the side street and side interior setback requirements associated with COA 380 for a site plan modification regarding the historic house and the construction of a garage adjacent to the house. The project consisted of enclosing the front screen porch and relocating the main entrance door to the west. Also proposed was the extension of the rear deck and the kitchen area and the installation of French doors off the dining room leading to the deck. Further, the project included the construction of a garage to the west of the main dwelling with a covered walkway connecting the two buildings. The Board approved COA 380 along with the requested variance for the reduction of the side street setback from 15' to 14'3" and the side interior setback from 10' to 4.5' with the following condition: 1) That the garage be reduced in width by 2' and that a 9' wide paved parking space be constructed to the west of the garage. The proposed parking space will encroach 1.5' into the required 5' landscape strip. The Board approved a waiver to LDR Section 6.1.4(B)(3)(b) to allow the paved encroachment. The reconfigured garage and paved parking area may be staff approved. HPB Staff Report 117 NE 7th Street(Lot 12, Block 1, Del-Ida Park)-Variance Request Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION /ANALYSIS Project Description: The applicant is requesting a variance from the side interior setback requirements for the construction of a lap pool measuring 8'x31'4", approximately four feet from the west property line. The pool with display an 8" brick border along its perimeter. The side interior building setback requirement for the R-1-AA zoning district is 10'. The proposed side interior setback measures 4' from the west property line to the water line of the proposed pool which requires the approval of a variance. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(J), in addition to the required findings of LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5) (copy attached), the Board may also be guided by the following as an alternative to the above criteria: (1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare; (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenances, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places; (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site; and, (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of a historic site or a historic district. (2) Or, as an alternative to Sub-Section (J)(1), that a variance is necessary to accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of a structure within a Historic District or upon a Historic Site through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare; (b) The variance would not significantly diminish the historic character of the Historic District or Site; and, (c) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to effect the adaptive reuse of an existing structure or site. (3) The Board shall otherwise follow procedures and impose conditions as required of the Board of Adjustments. HPB Staff Report 117 NE 7th Street(Lot 12, Block 1, Del-Ida Park)-Variance Request Page 3 Based on the current configuration and density of the lot, a variance cannot be supported for the construction of the pool at the proposed location. The variance would allow the construction of the pool directly behind the extant garage too close to the west property line and neighboring property. Therefore, granting the variance would be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. Further, granting the variance neither promotes the adaptability of the property nor promotes the use of the historic house. The special condition and circumstances that has necessitated the need for a variance is the recent intensification of use by the owner through the construction of the garage, extension of the deck, and other site improvements. Consequently, a special privilege would be conferred on the owner by granting the variance for the reduction of the side interior setback. Given the conditions under which this variance is being requested, it is not reasonable to believe that the variance would be granted elsewhere under similar circumstances. Regarding the construction of the pool, with respect to its location and design, a reduced setback from 10' to 4' is inappropriate, thus, the variance should not be granted. Based upon the above, there is a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (J). ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the side interior building g setback from 10' to 4' for an existing contributing structure located at 117 NE 7 Street (Lot 12, Block 1, Del-Ida Park), based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(J). C. Deny the variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the side interior building g setback from 10' to 4' for an existing contributing structure located at 117 NE 7 Street (Lot 12, Block 1, Del-Ida Park), based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 2.4.7(A)(5) and 4.5.1(J). RECOMMENDATION Deny the requested variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the side interior building setback from 10' to 4' for an existing contributing structure located at 117 NE 7th Street (Lot 12, Block 1, Del-Ida Park), based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(J). Attachments: Site plan, Staff Report 4.21.99, Photos Report Prepared by:Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner EXHIBIT A-REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5), prior to granting a variance, the granting body shall make positive findings that the granting of the variance meets the following criteria: HPB Staff Report 117 NE 7th Street(Lot 12, Block 1, Del-Ida Park)-Variance Request Page 4 a) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved which are not generally applicable to other land, structure, or building involved and which are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings subject to the same zoning (The matter of economic hardship shall not constitute a basis for the granting of a variance); b) That literal interpretation of the regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties subject to the same zoning; c) That special conditions and circumstances have not resulted from actions of the applicant; d) That granting the variance will not confer onto the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other lands, structures, and buildings under the same zoning. Neither the permitted nor nonconforming use of neighborhood lands, structures, or buildings under the same zoning shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance; e) That the reasons set forth in the variance petition justify the granting of the variance and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, buildings, or structure; and t) That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of existing regulations, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. . , • , ,,, ..,.. . • . . . .. .. . ..• ....•••... . „ . .1. •• . I . •. . .• ..... p I 2 EUOPOOLOS AND 13 d 00 — El— Ei-.--x '.....-1:E.----1 U .-- ---1.1—Er—cr- -a—m—o —3— 1: •[F---- ---- --LI=t1--- 9 II .,,K,c,,,Yt,%,5.„ •;,/,g 1 1.'•"-_,)47;4' '''' ,....;''. 0 I -FEEDL OOr1..R.4:PL"C.A47.N..4..NOTES ..L..P XOPAhll! I1 11 ..'\' / ...s-1.d..!.../' /2' _Ss•• .,,,- ,i,'. .., 1:17174;:7.r.=- ASSOCIATES,NC. E rhrra.-^--- Ara/lock Manners and I ..,,/ fc,,,::•: !:, •:•,, ss -I .•,'""' ± satis2;eAr - "••• (>L 1 *-1)--- .' iY\ v.l'',e Was, `y,,, ...`: .,,.:`%•.;„%i ,,--, ,,,,, ISITEILI EMU. e EYIOL aorri I I rC • i FI 1:701 IOTC.ARO nal,.ALIINKAIR PPM 41[OVA.,.04,0•150.2.1 206 C I Ox.x,il.xx Ix,o .444 I ,ILI t11-2111 XIII WI G1.2/0-111, 1 II k.S.I .,''''n'III'I '.*IEEE EEEMMEIEEM • VP. ''.." . 1 ,,, .- _ al En 1 jr 11 .'14'....L '1 Fi---P.X,ligx111•.14 , • \ ..i..,'' SJ, --r L-_I ,•' '•' • .: ,,,,!.,,,,;dA i ry,p„rti _,..,ad.d.1-.--' ---1-11-7-1--- 1-4 E.]------ , COITIMIX-101 r p 1111.,,---_,„,ii il , ., , iiri _r6.-)i, . x1011.15/ r 0,4f.'N, ,;,'?.. A • 0 ,..„ z/s.,••:, ,(...:';..54,,../,: 1 :€: i i•--111--11-11 :. 1 h 1 : 1 g 1.ii• I 71' 7E C3-- 8 I ria.t.T,r^4,•>..z„. ...tV4,,I Lp f.o... .s ....,,,,, ,._;/.. 1 [fi 1 li _LI II tir,l'"I741'17„11 I II- le __......_. _..._JI, E- - ,a 1, I ;Eht4.1...21_2_.-_.-__:1 V.r.'..":=,••,---. . •,::`7,it4:,•4.• P.,...4, ' 'f,,,,Korti), 1 :;):1 !: ;I ',,,,Ls.,+:.T. 1: 1 1-,...,..4 1 1 I F]...,,.... ';•.'''•11° tt.) 6 dai.•• '/•••; \.,'' '' ''" : 'v ,>. , ....Loc.! . •r 0 0 0 0 fini i! i , ED : I qiif :>.`'..'s 2 . ,:),,, „ ,'... ,x,' ::..,::,: :: ,.,-1 7•1'".','''''' 0,.ht:,,-ii-11-11-Tir-li-ii-1- -2,i 0 I 0 I. EryG.T., _N.,_......... --------- Eta GAS " ••'' "9''' ', •>, , ,r,fi,I ..,..3•-• ,.51..AL 1, 1. i !! .: : , -B=TEI I "-firaYiLiG EZI. ii I: " 'I I ' ..1r<,. i I 5 . 7..:;. ,\ Ca•ISE 44,,,r,,•' 4, ;7-:' I :, il qn i ii„il..;LiLil.. I.---pi - 'I 1 1 1 ,]............1.... 1''' 1,. kla3 s /.: ,..l. < : >.. z.,1,:: ,.,>. '' ' .:,,',.; <'•'`.;.i.,.* '';, 4• 1 --—- E-------- ,I 1,-, '..'s,w.4.-\‘.:•.y .0 - cAO_Ics_eac.00n i i,, II 1 V V v :: ii P. i I , P4,1••z _E....".'-. 6 lb db; ..-5, ..a ./ ' :,..,, ,. /,f,,, , I= .__,4_-:itiriE 1 lc,), ; ! ,,i.,.:,ns.,...,.... :)., ,':,:.',. 4 '\''' 1. 4 ' I -,1 — ....C>L,LIG.,PLATO4 1..26...0 ./XEW i I ".? Y 1 j• `,.' V'.. I. ASIk ak ": %'''''• :•4 <' e .,ci E] _ , I PENOVATON B vivo 'AV Ae..I, CLEit CD I , I I E xl.aut..1 xy•ax VP./OrJZ-1 OOFWT -P."Z<:'.</%''•'!". I - ----- 1 FESIDEfeCE il II ~g•-<;4.„-L'ss`..-T.2,-%-,,.....,,.4z,„.11: w,T•-, ,.•'., ,...,..t.t.'..,'.4-..,,....,';:pf,„,.. ;•: - „--, ,,,,, .,,-;. ,.. /.„..,,,,,,v,„...N 2,.......,,,,,,,, •4„-,...; , ,,,,,) IF.I.LE.O_LE, 8 ., :,! '3, :":;";:t ;'\*;"".7, ''''..:;71 ;;;"-•.•"*."'.' ';"7"; .< _alka ':\W-,' I= 4.1's //r. 1--c\--0E51,2E59 -'I , I,,..1.-7.,s,„...-', •••.;"• ;''•:;. e -,77.---,7, ,c, / ® 0 0 ® ® 0 1 i •!-- / - ;.--„, , ......„ •;.,..„. ..„,„ y ,.;..:,', . 4 s,N ( '4.....„24:,.'1' ,.}'W1''1 '..?.1 '.' 1,-..-,:,.;•• ,......3:-..,,..42.••Is's..,, ':: ,--71,-,,,,,,t,-„•-..•.-•,-.7•: rtt,',,•,-4, I , ' , .-, .„- \ .•„,, ;It, ; \ •,„,.. - •:.:,.., .)..... ,„ ,..,,-- ,,..,,,,i.,, •,...<:,.. , ..,•,-, ,;;• •,5'. -..-' 10 NE 71111 BT. ',- P,' z'..:.. .< '.,.4 ,...• ,' AS00 e ,i, v DELFiAY BEACH,Fi_ CIXAll APINIEd. i' I ';TT., \.S'..; X•S''.,./..7 I'•.II',I I TS\ /7: • ' t., ` : ,,, e• REVSKINS , \• /...w, <,..., ,...,a411E • )11.... i /..".. rfI./ • '',..' (' 1I'.:;,'..' FENCE•I dEE dNEET.49DO 102.16' -ry, - - , -,"."1------P",- -'-'----r-,---- ..- IL 127.00':1 An n•n• a ',8g:,!...1.7.Z;r0=--• • e q.,1 p,m.NEW FLOOR PLAN a 1--*- .•IX...WE VC•oxlat MN LAT CPI 011,111.DEA., SCALC.V4.•I., / As.uar.pArt,,,,a,r Ar „, ... ","".— GENERAL°ULM()NOTES <> ( ex,d,re. •LS•COONS '' :',' ''e'. V .• ';: ,. /------'... " nat'4,-=‘,f2.,.:=t1=:en.:r21.,:st='IX'S"4. "V".;......s."'N=4T'ffZ="7.7..ALS":ontAi=c•XSZIk' CI C.C.41141.4.1,24 A.yr,,x.p.....6,-•.x.,Erxrxi‘Tcxx“..,x6 op,,,.,,,,•.4 p., ,1.0,Ar..,ryll ofJOnpo pp I..PED rx46.iric•xxa px4.1 Cf...TICIA g) EXIST..6L,I. riF;sql7rti"'pa':‘;'111. 8 ,ii.' ''4 ‘,( ',, csNron.N.c,a..ALL.APIXICAOLE EXC..00 MEXIXATI<A4 NII,O...EL.OWLET.X KlertNIIX•nss rOrr.•2/NCI WE 41.10,ax• TO 14.11A. M ., ,,. •,, n,W -.', GA4.,.`r,===" 1°Z..;:g4-.f.;712‘. ------"-----'--- 'f.!..,-.141,''.7.TaZ44sL..Z.%°,=NI•aar.Z.3".-W: •(> EXISTS..i•FdAr-do....L WITH 5,1,1.1*LAP SONG TO — " .. P-tr41:es7•1 :p.gi.5,.:..Z.L1111",r4=' 'Nfsi.rs'gtila7s".=T•trnN"2.n...,.=4"4,"....isr"'.4""T „,,,,„,, 7 ICA202 ,-,1=..4,..",,.-.-tntAr'grz.--ogg AI-. — 0. Emmammo .11 E•{EXTE RIOR 41.1000 671-0 a,, — L:.,,r,.ST.EXT SNAGS 1,11sOOD. PROPOSED ; 14 A/6 X1EA C A,C41,14.41,...a.....e.....11,4 --c) ===...t, MU a 5/15.S.ITERIOR PARTITICN FLOOR PLAN 7. 0 8082."'"' I c.F.2.1 CALM...NS 0 ElaillEEEN111 TOTA1 E..C.LI,CE pi A2C 1.31-1 9,P ExISTINS S.FRArldD StALL 'r4/16/al I'67)F711 ,,...,ALLIT1.1 Sap Ly WONG TO NE 7TH STREET KE..ILivs,a stt AdDITICN 311.SP ...... .. 11 3 COvERED NA... dl 11,S .2E7EG'PNISN SM.ECULS FOR ALL MATERIALS ...Set 11,C.U.SIALL SECTICNS 1,12 NOISS GASU4d --Th L.'. I,I.V.IS SCR IIIIISKIS I 11 lol M /do.st - - --.--$. . . Alik ELJOPOULOS AND ITV El -ii? '. 4-.,"7.01 '—.._=_Ib—- _u_ ----'11,_-=-._.4.7.'.••-...r.... 1J-.-1: =ri---r5" • - • -n--=--a=---tr-- --a---d---b- 3 7.t V.Iaf;OE •; _., - A\, `''',- ''' ''',''`l'- P2ra" A 2 I ` ..•,,,-.,:;\:.-r,-e:----.-..,,.....,.,..-.. .,...-, ...,..--., s,,s,....„: .1 • ---.„....•• .,-,r, s.,*„•, ..1.,?MU' , .4G .., . FLOOR PLAN NOTES. 1 Ess2EQ3E,12 II )\ ,::/,.,k‘;',/ ko 'i,,i,,/• '/4/Or 4,....gezze —1:1=8:4=1.1•••rtrL•••otro•Rt., I 1 1 00f1 11 PooL II •k's,'` ',$)Pti,',',' ."$, •‘$1.,', re e-,4 /0/ i 1 or...r....,..-=............... \,:,.%_4._. ›_ _t. ,-__.,' . , - / / ! ; ..1 0 -' 4, ' .41).• * g7P17.;•7" """°"'"*" ASSOCIATES,NC. I ,4, • I'- <•.1 ISk• 11 ---1 -- .-'!- .11121111 ---:,2) •- k - - - - II I. p:24 t• : Er..',7,7z,---, 0°,,==— ArchbeL Mennen end FAselor Daimon LP 1 1-i,,,c2.,AT.F_QE , lf----,'-^Irr,„:7N ..-,„ 1 cs ".•;,„ ,,dp...„,......... . . ,...i. :;„77.7,17.,...„5,..,,,.,..e.sit,,:1.......:_,.......:1.274.1.7i,..:.:71.,.._.;_s_.ji*,..i:..;;;st:1.441177...,,..,:„.....<4,5tys.F.:.st:1.1.it.:filis-.,1 R9:727.,:.9 77:2,H,.......-41'-'61_',:] ilj. ,r I -, . r.',4:::,..'9.7.17.t0Z7,4? 1 EalL I e Exar, P•RH I V, I 1 g 1 D 1,4 COOL. • 1 , S, tar Q., : 1=1 '4.1g...... 1 -' I(7) Es-,..1.1..11,..11 wat 1....0 ortA•.•maTeco I ''''''n'. le I ‘-'. 7/. • - —".. 9 o .a.4 r l 1 I.V I 11, - I 1•0•1•11',Ann e- __ .4e,,s, ;,,,.., •••••••' - • ,-, i I . .-V•ii" .. 1 all' — 7F-:,-, I e':''' E':,'4,,,,,A , ,% -;;r/ ,, :1,0 ..v, ,I 1 a ' a :! 1 ,:lgi'f, ' ,...__. .o e .----- --- 1 I . lus .,• ..„*„.„, :,.., ,,,,.. * ..}-0.-: F• 1.1 , \; %, „„,.7 • ., . 'I CI 91 PO _ i. Ed.O•URD r.:I° I • III .' 4...e• S'Y.c.,'• ,•10 CATO :t V ' •c 7 ,-al I 4 NO Fri. 11 li 11 i li ,.. — .... „ ,. „ 1 , a-1,Z' ,,,, ' \./ •".. \., flARACIF ,INA\.., \' \ ,/,'• I • :I [;:l 11 1,..ii..4-4.. 1 I et %;,, ',:.,.NA - CI t • 111,') . ,-4..„< 11 . '17.1,-77 T1119 E2o5/. a lb e,N ); (....11 _ , %..,,,,,,,t ..,,,' 1„..; i i MASTER MED/ROOM , :1,11 • • . . ,,,,Z.,_IL_L._ _ I e .t _E.••-•,- rs __ 1 . ' e..,,, - II d . .‘0 \'';‘:. ',334.s.. ,'' 1 - r''': '4'`,'//.• .. I - ---* 4- ------'1 . I 21..d3--Z -( 'I p...m. 1 ,0 ,:.'‘'',„,„ ,,,/,'77.\•A 1 EA ACII '‘: 4$1K, :`, ;; $,,...' leE Li FEN:HATCH W viler.,e.i-, ...,4, .: ,'_, ,... cdy i, .. a OORNDT a I *.7/•-em,.•,A a ,. , ,...• — ' ,. !,,,, -r-N, I FEECEACE ,.'":-..-:ed-2•4.,* -.. ' ,, ... iii 2 I ,•,,4; ":!•••4%,,•%•',,,s;v'':•%isli'i PR.:'-..A- ":.....1..34M, •.,4„_.. --- T-f,'-k•-i,--4. 0/-- --7--.7-----71—, ;f. ••••'s,..''.:%:-..\-..., .• ,,,, ,,;:-/,...f. ,1,;, s\,,, ..v,,,,,p,,•NA. ,.., ..,,,,a .EGREB9 I _[.o.............. s'Z'£. f 1 rai st‘ - F ,st::•,,..,.. • ,,„.i.,,,,,,,,,..j.,„ _.. . .,_. ... .._. z-,, ',,, // 1 1 li .,•;i,.Wi' --I °•• ',.4'.4...ir' '•:"":.T.', `,.' -•_; 41-:ft-1,?: .e.,:..,::•„,.....,.. ., .. ''It"I --1, -,7-77-1 sr:•,- Not -__ ._____._,...,__ 'f ::; '.,_, ' :'; $•.:,.;.::',,,, ,..,:;4 :.,14,.:',3g. ji A;,..;,:i.,:y0{, :;),1! (2) (29 (9. Q.) (9 (9 L ,,.. :,:i;4...-?'':s4„, 4'''' 4.4;\;\‘`M".",i•'..!'_44.'-'4it.:4‘,is-4 44,4?‘,., ;;_L A _...!1>_,.:_i__,L.:,_i_____.:::,z_ 1 ,- I ••• I ,.- 1,- I „., .... , ., x..,7, :;•$A',/,', ,,,.;•/'' ;*VI' ' ' - .1.1. % .,' '-t,'.•e• .6., `' /*/).0.affEr.IA-•i 'D.. 1V1€71111 BT. ,'N, '/n,,,,,. / N,.` /,.•ii'' (;_)-- 's sigr DELRAY BEACH.FL I ''':::,:' ''...0-''',$,4r'' ,'-'i'l t• '.•''''I • (.-.) • ‘I, ce ...IP AMON. W I ,• .,,,,1' •,,:.i.,,,,i,•,:.//.,,,, ,.: .........' 4,..;2 Zt s _ • , .. -•./ ••/-- - FENCE•1 f.:E E SWEET A960 10216 - — — . ' ..., "F...lf"?.:=1.=7,:r'''• 2 4 4, 127.00 .. k• AI N ••Z•laYLD 0.00[1..41•O•44.' — ,- NEW FLOOR PLAN • LECEND ,..:I* . ;.iAp..,.v...m...... ''. ,?'f":4:: .t_•-1'!, - GENERAL BULDNG NM ES ED le SCALE.V,•1,15. ----<1) WALLSDOO • RS '4.:..2...;"11.n, .p.,,.,.,,,,t.,..„.1,,• ,D• --K) TO ea REr10,20. Ex15111.1.4LL II':s.=.PER II% TO REPIAN i ...-.•• 4'./.• \,/:, \\ .,4- ..• C ,L.Zii34•fi:,,:,.•7.,-.,t!S.,0W*4., , y.''-N,',1.'.,,',-:' :, L .1`"'7",.:71,.,1".:..,"„...4..,tr.'rJ'..Z.;7...'.2.. . .- - •-•-•-'-•- .'., o,T=T'rA;L7zz11,'72,r4,r..rt.'•4;:" • r". —K• EL.xAia1 T5.1•6L•A FPR ASMOEK.D W TAOL L mt mr,ein 710A202ifatv4 , 0 NEW 2 x A EXTERJOR WOOD MID DOWD.Trig t UALL W/SW IXT,GRADS TLY1000. PROPOSED 'En::•17,;t44a2rg ft i•C•itta o•eLooc ea...Z VAZ. n,7 . ..„.,c,,,,,„..,, NARDn•LANC S,DIN1 --(,. EZ272=52222 NEW A Pal.1NTER1OR PARTITION FLooft PLAN I ,V,V,;SZT.'&741141,..'". AREA CALCULATIONS 0, UMUNIUME111,'PI M EXISTIN1••FRAM,WU. TOTAL ExIST.liaDER A/C uo ST vt•TI1 WI.LAP 00.0 TO '-',1/16/01 1724 NE 7TH STREET NEW L1,41,4 1,1.ADDITION -.— TOT..MOM AIR 332 bl• 1..1S ST ." 980710 WOLIN FO FO EVE [ 7. ...NED WALKWAY' 6 CdRAOM ••LEE TT 1 1,P .SA• ••• MON SCULDLILO R AIL MATERIALS.• I,CAL WALL MGT...! R ROMS •PLANS FOR 1.16.1.1TS. , olA1•14 4111,01... TOTAL 224.ST A2.02 '377.77;47717';7'fj:Yi:',%:77.77.77,77:77,77:77,T21.: : .',','.1' ,",'1.-.7.:,,V‘,-.::;,',:,. ,i''''.' '...,",'..I I•• : .:.,",. '...:',.' , • ' . , ::,.''...,,',... '. :,:.::."I:'''., ' ' '' ,. ',•:•••,. . : • ,..:...,.::...1::::::%:... . .., .:.-.....,: PEACH DEERAY BEACH iiiszi •Amer All•AmeriraCity HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 11111 MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT III 7993 7493 Agent: Shutter Services & Screen Repairs, Inc. Project Name: Skinner Dental Lab Location: 703 NE 3`d Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of hurricane panels pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lots 27 and half of Lot 28, Block 13, Del Ida Park. The property contains a contributing, frame vernacular building constructed in 1950 as a single family home. The property is zoned Residential Office (RO). The residence was converted to a medical office building in 1993 and is today the Skinner Dental Building. PROJECT DESCRIPTION /ANALYSIS Project Description: The project proposal is to install vertically mounted, storm panels. The proposed storm panels consist of imbricated, corrugated aluminum alloy panels that will slide into a track or channel. The panels will then be stored when not in use. The shutters will range between 32" and 74" wide and will measure between 38" and 84" in length and will be designed per each window's specifications. Due to the new Florida Building Code, the applicant is required to provide storm panels when impact resistant windows are not provided or available. Design Elements Analysis: LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (a) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not Agenda Meeting Date: August 7, 2002 Item: III.E. 703 NE 3`d Avenue, Storm panels Del-Ida Park Page 2 limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. Conclusion As the office building is a contributing building within the district, it is imperative to ensure that modern equipment, such as hurricane protection, is retrofitted for use on the exterior. As the panels will be removed and the channels/tracks can be painted to match the exterior of the building, removable panels are an economically feasible alternative for storm protection as their installation will be neither invasive to the fabric of the building nor will their use be disruptive to the character of the historic district. Based on the analysis above, a positive finding with respect to LDR 4.5.1 can be made for the installation of the storm panels. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of storm panels on a contributing building located at 703 NE 3`d Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards with the following condition: 1) That the tracks or channels be painted to match the exterior of the building. Attachments: Photos and Specs Report Prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner "For all your shutter needs" 11 330 N.E. 4th Street• Suite A • Delray Beach, Florida 33444 South County: 561-274-4949 • North County: 561-833-7810 • FAX: 561-274-7111 WW / qf , ,C�/N/V�12 d bI1/�Z- Z/f3 70_3 g E-: 362.o 3T 33yyy • ® 7yk39 3GxS/ a GR�SS I ©I 0 3�x5/ 3x5/ 'D 3 xs/ 3GXgi " 3� 0 g8�57 32h-xLi . 0 50 1vPnci pro ALvmfrilvm H(/i'iR/G4NV / i1/ZS licensed•Bonded•insured Lic.t:U-166962 ( ...._.+ r .4_.I ini ' LOS:'ii \ t�_ I I I I __ ----- 0 " 0 1/4-20 r-,AUNTt�I'�' 1.05"MIN. •OG 2 99 2__25.0_' .250':. 1,OI'• o r o -UIRECTIp l MATS Th/, t o 0 or11 / IL_�� (-" \ffi'flIE I1 :7, v �'- __ - i -i r =1`-__ _ '),__I- I� .\ UIE �_l rJ .094' i ) 1 I i v m o JI N 120"� 09L" ,17' v - 1 ' 12.00"COVERAGE I • •OGZ P 062"�' N • oI0 = 125"� o� oI 0G 2"� r 2 00"MIN, o z- 1--_ __- _G.000_CUV RA 4 u - �'1 _ _ l 1 Uz ,l,-g_y•-�� ,_ c+• �}} 5 00"MAX. ='_ 0,3I' .375" 375" 1.25 `W• - - ,.._..._ z�oao � lz_000_'l tt�2_?0..�\L)f r17�Ctpr0li,Cd' Pt`iANCC W �roru4l PANEL ,A...i�_�'f �`,Z y` . r------ 1 I 1 rnu sronM rnNEL - I1°I IenDEr1 u^I IEnuErl � oL 'u"r IE uel�_i •1Q++l lrrIg Tut; 0 SCALE:3"e 1.-0.. Cf�-.___---. > �_-.._. -- 3 �l�r.Cl. �- I I F, SCALE 3". I'-0" / SCALE 13"c 1' 0" SCALE r 3". 1 0" ®SCALE 3' - ,'- " ( .. _o q SCALE 3:�a-1-G•-�-- : '• till rl• , {�1rU 111 r 1- U` L + \� t.5zs" BSi P.1L ----_--------- . ,„ N; - GEfIEI1nLrJDIES_ L•"'?' ---' $ x stop _725L.LLE, .700" - w Y UAEciion ii ,375"R 526 Ihl;Ilf117i(1(1 ._--, -•52�' X L. TIIESE PRODUCT EVALUAItort oocur-trorS RF.PIIr.5E111 A 5111171En SYSTEM NE.SIGUEN MAY OE AND TESTED ill ACCORDANCE WI111 1 Hr: 1999 STANDARD LIIIILDIII(i CUUf. 1115 1'LUTIIOn f1EVER5E0 r 11-I-ri .090" pr•.I1? li( I _ --- _1.f- -0�"_ sw❑OLDING CODE.2001,ACID IIIE SDCCI TEST STANDARD FOR DETERMINING nip ACT _ o v+ Y7 =;I[;fin,-: I� ' e RESTS TA7ICE FROTI 4/II0BOREIE DEDRIS,SSTO 12-99. '- o ,r //( I - 2 - _ U �1 �zis""�=1=_ll- -�' I�n['•I�I);pl,,rli'j zls,. i r �ii°s '"" >_ o 2. 7111S SYSTEM IIAS VEEIJ SUBMITTED TO SnrCI,PST R.ES!rOfl EVALUAT1011 AS A N r- _ 1 ,� -� w� LARGE MISSILE Il-IPACT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM. l 091" - ,090U 1 I ,,3lS"" 1 l L 1l 11 r�CJrlin�l� �-""-�„�,,,, Wh l--- - t o0 1101. rL -.3,s••n;- s(1t 1,'1,.- 3. f-O5111`It AND NF.GA TIVE DESIGN LOAD CALCULATIONS SHALL or PERror,oF.0 III �� 632' �`----'--- -- SYN. A CCORUANCE W1111 ASCE 7-90 "MWIFIUFI IJESIGFI LOADS FOR DUILUIIIGS ANO��' �Jl; 5.00"MAX. L.Dt,llls(r,1pl{!SI.....__.-_ .70 Or- •---^^ Y� (j 0111E11 STRUCTURES",USING A DIRECTIONAL!!Y FACTOR I<d-1.0 AND IllE rl UILI Aa�e01LDRK;cow,. .,OC RIJIN(i WI,•ID vEL OC11Y TO OE1 5 151 111 11 11 1E DESIGN LO O Oil MUD ANGLE _ U ANGLE C-1 C1ACI< C_�'�jq��� TO LISE. WHEN REFERENCING I'1IF.SE 000UI'IErl75. A 33 0 nLLOt•/Al1LE SIII SS ��SCALE r 3" 1•-0' - SCALE,33"• I'-0" O SCALE,HALF SIZE 1(,1,1•ly1 G!(i L!Il �$ INCREASE HAS BEEN USED II 111E DESIGN OF THIS PRUUUCT. _- e / 5 ALE Hunenv �LF SIZE I.. TIIESE rnoour.f EVALUATION DOCUMENTS ARE PREPAnto we HIE PI10111N I r.nowtER \�1T3) AND AIlS 01111.RIC. 111EY DO 1101 INCLUDE IIJP Uft11A 1IUIl PREPARED roll A SPECIFIC SITE. Ilylll[381111(J ,....«•+--- „�•k a y- 5, IIIESE PRODUC1 r.VALLIA 1111N WWI AILS Nor VALID FOR 1'twll1 WI I1101Ir 7h,� Gp ' UIlIDIlAI SIlGIIAIIIut DAIE.3.ElIIlUSSilj Sr,AL op EAc II I'rinnI coo) Hill 111111111/�I I.3/5"IIIII .37h'•J. pLLzl E� ya(O0' I rIttivA I11! dill'rlo !1 It I:IIII111It!!III I AI'I'lh ABLE wI 1'.1lll.1 ito lull A I IA II Y. r '1 ply tiAX, '_'•1 'I9P-1_I -- -_ .I2!)•({�1 Oa. � W g� nI'I'IUIVnI Nil Util'.II I I!;nu I'll I wpm II A 111lrlll.11'ALI 11'UII tl I I -I Illl Homo tH II Il I I'll" I l-1 1 U G. 111CSE PROOIICT CVAI.lJn 11oN DOCUIIElITS ARE SUITABLE 10 LIE M'PLIFU UY TILE .092 -d- -- '�-- o CONTRACT OR rllnv1UEI7111E TON 1nm:IUR ODES'lot OE VIA.'E now HIE COITI)I110r15 -� -( fTYI''� I-il - 1 I - 313"Ir.52"�G55" r ���313"iLSz-'�G55" oo �� t� r + , UC,Art rU IIERCIII Am lilt cw1111AC loll vEltirIES IIIE EXISTING SIRl7CluRE IS - L74" ,655" �- �_ z CAPABLE Or SUI'PUR I111G 111E LOADS, ' 1� -.--, rs r� p 5 Yl or•1r l_31Q- ,: ... / 0,090"(TYr.) •IA 7. ALif.RA TIUIIS OR ADDITIONS TO 11115 UOCUFIEr1T AIlS NOT PERMIT!Ill. ! p !„� 0. WHERE 1NE C011TRAC TOR OR T11E BUII_fJITIG OFFCIAI.REQUIRES UOCI1F,E1115 FOR 1_1377" 1 a SIZE SPECIFIC APPLICA11011,TIIESE UOCU1lENts SHAD_OF.PREPARED O'I A run,. --- - - .. 1•Y 0.090"ITYr.I I d IlEGIS IERENGINEEREU EN on A0CITI1EC1 FOR SAID APPLICA1-IO11. _ __ 1 2.00'• l LEG DIRECTION 9. 4/11E11 IIIE SITE COIIUIiIOIIS DEVIATE rROM 711ESE PRODUCT EVALUATIOII DOCUMENT S. J• I5 OPTIONAL OR ASPECT ARC CHITECT.(II L71H[Il S SHALL 11 l I1JG SITEESPECI�IC C1 A l LO!f5%fiES I EII n EII OYEA O GUILD-OUT f-1 FIAC1C � P"Tf1nC1< Ba "F"ANGLE-7riAC1< V.J.KTIE2E1VrC1i DELCGA I ED FLORIDA AEGIS T ERED ENGUItfn OR ARC'III ECT SAID(MC01.1E.1115 SMALL C SCALE r HALF SIZE Ihi At 1 hf I'1DUQi t111D!19 T tt,i.�l�r €IOW tol OSEALE r IIAIF SIZE nit..u/ r[coi,on DEAR THE DATE,SIrirlATURE,AND ORIGINAL ElIP MISSED SEAL DF IIIE DELEGATED ENGINEER OR ARCIIIT ECT AND SHALL DE SUBMIT 1 ELl 10 TILE PRODUCT ENGINEER DE Cgr�41'LI�,i'1Cli el lltia plan�;slll)i[?cl 1'J FOR REVIE4/. • 10. TIIESE PRg01ICi rJOC1I11F.1115 ARE I101 VAI,lO roll• PERMIT UF4E55 SI(ir 11'.U,IlA1CD Hie r)llllrlt CS EII)15•111{O"ill^I f: C•lUi1;711�1111�R1N 1111 IJIpTII U IIEL ED'V•' r..\f Il_ T'7 �1'' ',� /�rl�� '• 1 r, T PERP.t0 PANEL SPAN I t- Et ipoSSED WIIII A SEA(.nY V.J.XIIEZEVICII,P.E. 9il btl(Ic,I�tt,� EI I IL%� rl. FIUU ICI' I1. t•RIUIE COTII'LIAiICt 5-HIll SST1 12-99 IS 17EOIIIREl7,PAIIELS SITALL.BE PEIIIJA11CI1fLY 25' willop,5{;1.. 1.-,I "Sy?i L M.I:CJI tiI•InF.IIL 3S G�11�, T'ir. SECTIO(15 �'I�•I O-r[�gO- - LAL'ELEI)I-/I Ill A MIIJII-IUFI OF 0111: LABEL PER OPENING On A CCP III'ICA IE OF r- '"I (;'•E?Q°3. R1112 �II1G[v`=)E 9I1�11{ - - - ---" V l L L COLIPl.InICC SITALL or PROVIDED DY IIIE MAlIUFACTUWIER AND INSTALLER,WIIERE ��))- Illb `Ilr �•' - -- - LABELS ARE USED, I IDE LAPEL SITALL READ AS FOLLOWS, , - 1a..!,__ -_ 4;)(?(;ill.' e t :S V[1y 5!!t YU*V11(�f1t�'f tr'5711 `U !, loWll A COI1t11PY INUIISIf1IGS,TIC, a I } I poiF1;-_;‹ rr.LANOENPALG.rl. �fiI mlvIjtlrftll'iC�:UI7fiG� 3G':`• CCiI".!ti{9l7 nJl IRj n ; pyy'`Ct• ^^III 12dH1 Lnll(7G M11ISSIL.IE IMI'nf:T 1lfiSl.^.IALJI Y.'Q9._,1 ri EPLAN VIEW CZC ..1 p= r 1-" ►Y(dI(��d5n0�6VI� 1Ec111�i1�716t'iI) lullrr! O . r i !r Ye,9 12. (111 Il I'nllIlAS Ill)S UEEII 111 II J in IIIE NIA Xtl lull v,r AFIS AND LOADS"IIUWIN ZAMAC B AI.LOV r 1 Di! �,i, 1 N c Y Y i or, IIICSE DRAWINGS, DESIGN IS BASED ON COILS M1Uci1011'CESIUM CORPIii1nM011 IIUG�Ion Ir�Yi'�OLE�lPTl1S (m.� iI,•;�r,, W ° r h p x i, flo.IC. 99I IESI woof;UIl l S Ito.97-003,No 9n_2-0 Ilo.90-010,hIv.90-0,,, Ilo.90.014, WING Nor' _ i„ , ,p tiv.99_OLr,,No.DO_0(.1,Ilo.00_022 R.Ho.02-012. O,- QZrrIO.IU�'�1lIjGIiIE f(l Et nl.l*l I)L Ull uT� �� OO _ "�;��Y .• 13. STORI-I PANELS SHALL BE 300L- ( SCALE iIIAL- fSlZE C o'0w= V ;2ir-..r. 113r• ALUMINUM ALLOY 1141 O.TI f.o"1; o oho" \ HII Ilmols Uh,Ell�llt'�bF;flt3fie. ^2:15 �� iiifi ALUM 1I .FOI1 0 SIO 1lS SHOWN S,STORM PANELS Sllnll 111), - A l/I a J0 (�ALUM.I, ALLOY.EX TRUSIUNS SliO4/II SibALL BE 6063-76 ALUM. ALLOY,II.UdJ, I�/,T4•_--.'_-- 1U�,Z' • II. ALL SURE.I•!S AND GOUTS TEl nE 2024-TL AE.U19 RJUt4 AI-LQY, STAINLESS STFEL, C„ L (, ) T^ OR GALVANIZED S'IEEL 1VIT11 A l'IIIJIhIUI-I TENSILE STREIJG 111 OF hU I<.S.I.,U.U.N. PERMIT i o, � ��`=`-- , z"�' 1.!_1-,-�1' - •"^ " •- 15. TOP AND D07101'1 DETAILS MAY DE IFIT-E.RCHANGED AS FIELD CONDITIONS ~BOT TOfTMOUNT-� °" 01/25/99 REQUIRE.PAIIELS MAY ALSO BE MOUNTED HORIZONTALLY Ir C-TIIACI<,111111.1) , �e OUT F-7RATA:.'F' TRACK, 'I'' ANGLE TRACK,51Ut) ANGLE OR UIRECI 1.10UtI1EU MOUNT �1 •� IS USED. •- -- ----" - �ii werta��e:•c" c� CON'BACI0l1 Dt OWNE11 1M E MOUNT ELEVATION El Q , . j ILLS. Q •.r,r.,_ --s.. r99-0;291, J i o9-J0 --- 5• Oh/2J 02 (-- -- HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Agent: Jeff Falconer/Mike Weston Project Name: Caribe Cafe 2002-315-COA Project Location: 814 & 816 E. Atlantic Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation vinyl signs for the Caribe Cafe, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The property consists of a restaurant, the Caribe Café. The non-contributing building is designated historic as a part of the Marina Historic District. Built in the Masonry Vernacular style, the one-story commercial building is zoned Central Business District (CBD). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The restaurant proposes the installation of three vinyl graphic film logo signs at three window locations (one on 814 E. Atlantic Avenue, at 816 E. Atlantic Avenue) throughout the property. The proposed sign will display a white crab and pepper overlay logo with a '/2" white border and red vinyl lettering stating "Caribe Café" in caps. The three signs will vary in size from 22.44"x28" to 28x36" to 41"x51" with the largest located on the window facing the street. ANALYSIS The Board shall consider: SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(1)(b) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Wall Signs" A flush mounted sign. There is one sign face for a wall sign. A wall sign shall not project more than eight inches from the wall upon which it is mounted. Types of wall signs are canopy signs, mansard signs, and painted signs. 814 &816 E.Atlantic Avenue August 7, 2002 Page 2 LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and states: The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7). LDR Section 4.6.7 (H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (E) with respect to height and area. Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building facade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the architecture. A list of suggestions then follows, the two operatives in this instance are: • Sign style should reflect the appropriate architectural periods. 814 &816 E.Atlantic Avenue August 7, 2002 Page 3 • Sign dimensions should be in proportion to the building's size. • Appropriately designed lighted signs enhance a district. However, the exterior source of the lighting should be concealed. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation No direct reference is made to signage affecting historic structures, sites, or districts, however, there is specific intent to project the importance of preserving "character- defining" and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility with respect to new construction for historic structures and districts. Conclusion The proposed signage conveys the identity of the establishment and is in keeping with the scale of the building. Though the sign is not affixed to a wall, wall sign standards do apply. The vinyl signs shall have one sign face and will be flush mounted on each window. The color scheme and logo of the proposed signage does not detract from the surrounding contributing historic structures or from the neighboring district and uses the design to attract the attention of both car and pedestrian traffic without being garish or uncomplimentary. Based on these facts, positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7, the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA for the installation of a sign for the Caribe Cafe. C. Deny the COA for the installation of a sign for the Caribe Cafe with the basis stated. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of three vinyl signs for the Caribe Cafe, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7. (G)(1)(b), (G)(2)(b) and (H)(2)(a-c), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Report prepared by Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner Attachment: Sign Details • Small_Buildi.ng'-sWindow 51" W. x 62" H. = 21.95s.f. . Vinyl Graphics 28" W. x 22.44" H. (approx.) Covering 20% of the allowed coverage. Pi i1 E- - 28" r cv SCALE 1:5 .ri fJ 10 - - ' - 8: - -r 22.44" 1 • m N a A In to I --- I DRAWING APPROVAL LE Signed: Name:_ Date: 07/17/02 Rollo.: Approved: Resubmit z COPYRIGHT-002AVAU SIGN MANUFACTURING:ay signing this design approval you agree that the design is exclusive property of Avail Inc. q T Reproduction or any other use of this design or any variation by any other than Avail Sign Manufacturing will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Lo _- •K•:. Tr----7.---- Tup Frree Phane: 1-800�634-5007 u1 ;4rCustomer's Fila Na: - - ' '1-- 3825-2 INVESTMENT LN. Toll Free Fax: 1 SOQ-834-ti058 a `.1411 P! U _ACT Rid• `•:. - WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33404 Tel (561)840-1844 VK 37788 www-avallsigns.com " Fax. (581)84i0-1544 E . Dining..Area - Street Facing Window 114" W. x 93" H. = 73.62s.f. Vinyl Graphics 51" W. x 41" H. (approx.) Covering 20% of the allowed coverage. NT 11. __.-_ 51 ___________-.-_•---I G2 SCALE 1;10 - / I Ill _ ., ;, 1.11 41" cr U , in Tr OD v, i z x a 1- Z . l I DRAWING APPROVAL a Signed: 0712210�Name:_ --•.- _.—_Date: 0 P.o.No. Approved: Resubmit z COPYRIGNT3002 AVALU SIGN MANUFACTURING:By signing this design approval you agree that the design is exclusive property of Avail Inc. T Reproduction or any other use of this design or any variation by any other than A vaii Sign Manufacturing will be prosecuted to the hdlest extent of the law. ercoonammiesamaati _ `` _ _ Toll Free Phone: 1-800-834-5007 Customer's File No: `` 382v-2 INVESTMENT LN. ~ ` '_... _ Tall Free Fax: 1-800-834-6058 cc :.1°14 NLi -.- CTf JRtN WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33404 :...__ _ ..: Tel (561)840-1844 VK 37788 .:� :._. .....,,µ.:.me.. _. ,,,,. r www.avaiisigns.com Fax.: (561)840-1544 Dining Area - Side Window 71" W. x 71" H. a2 36s.f. Vinyl Graphics 36" W. x 28" H. (approx.) Covering 20% of the allowed coverage. to 36" CO ;, Ill m h) - iJ . ,_ - , , ,. . . . - - . in 0 .,- 400 ,-., .„,, .. . O t CT CO ri o cc J_. 1 z L� DRAWING APPROVAL a. Signed:—_— Name:—._ .... __bate:_.07/22/02 P.p.No.: _ _- Approved: Resubmit sCOPYRIGNT2002 AVALI SIGN MANIUFACTURING:By signing this design approval you agree that the design is exclusive properly of Avail Inc. Reprodkiction or any other use of this design or any variation by any other than Avail Sign Manufacturing will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. z Tail Free Phone: i-S00-834-�007 ---- r _jr: :_t� -t— Customer's File No: �' ',;AY---., ;s.3825-2 INVESTMENT LN. Toll Free Fax:1-800-834-5058 .:�� ''�'� ,_ ��_ _ �� • ,4 Tel Tel.. (5G1)840-1844 4s _ CT1JRl - WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33404 ' P1' 37788 I4 , 1�U �r _.- .. t5si)840-1544 h-..,_.- :�_. Fax. E www_avalisigns.com ........................