Loading...
HPB-09-18-02 9/18/02 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: September 18, 2002 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 6:05 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott, Bill Branning, Rhonda Sexton, Jim Keavney, Francisco Perez-Azua, Gloria Elliott (arrived at 6:09). MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Wendy Shay, Loretta Heussi II. ELECTION OF OFFICERS A. Chairperson The floor was declared open for nomination for the position of Chairperson. Ms. McDermott moved to nominate Ms. Jamison. The motion was seconded by Ms. Sexton. There being no other nominations on the floor, the motion passed 6-0 to elect Ms. Jamison as Chairperson of the Historic Preservation Board. B. Vice-Chairperson The floor was declared open for nomination for the position of Vice- Chairperson. Ms. Sexton moved to nominate Ms. McDermott. The motion was seconded by Mr. Keavney. There being no other nominations on the floor, the motion passed 6-0 to elect Ms. McDermott as Vice-Chairperson of the Historic Preservation Board. C. Second Vice-Chairperson The floor was declared open for nomination for the position of Second Vice-Chairperson. Ms. Elliott moved to nominate Mr. Perez-Azua. The motion was seconded by Ms. Sexton. There being no other nominations on the floor, the motion passed 6-0 to elect Mr. Perez-Azua as Chairperson of the Historic Preservation Board. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Caribe Café, 814 & 816 East Atlantic Avenue, Marina Historic District, Jeff Falconer & Mike Weston, Owners. Action Before the Board: The item before the Board is approval of a Class II Site Plan Modification for the conversion from retail to restaurant and the installation of canvas awnings for Caribe Cafe, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the item to the Board. The applicant submitted a modified site plan depicting changes to the parking area which dedicates five additional spaces for use by the Caribe Café restaurant. Mr. Weston and Mr. Falconer were present to represent the project. Class II Site Plan Modification After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. Sexton, and passed 7-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class II site plan modification for the Caribe Cafe, based upon positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, subject to the following condition: 1) That the stenciling or signage on at least 5 of the parking spaces designated for Busch's, which are in close proximity to the subject restaurant, be available to all the businesses, including evening hours. Design Elements It was moved by Mr. Branning, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated design elements for the Caribe Cafe, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed ice machine be screened with lattice or PVC fencing. B. Kyros Development, Inc. 21 SW 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Mike Presley, Authorized Agent. -2- HPB Minutes 9/18/02 Action Before the Board: The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a free- standing sign associated with Kyros Development, Inc., pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Shay entered the project file into record and presented the item to the Board. It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 7-0 to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign at 21 SW 1st Avenue, Kyros Development, Inc., based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7., and the City's Design Guidelines. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: None B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: Ms. Jamison inquired about expanding the Del-Ida Park Historic District as the Historic Structures Survey recommended. Ms. Shay stated that she will further research the idea. Ms. Elliott inquired about expanding the Old School Square Historic District to include more of South Swinton Avenue and to develop a buffer from the railroad tracks. Ms. Shay stated that she will work with Ms. Elliott on the project. D. Staff: None V. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 6:50 P.M. -3- HPB Minutes 9/18/02 The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for September 18, 2002, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on June 18, 2003. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -4- HPB Minutes 9/18/02 ELECTION OF OFFICERS CHAIRPERSON Nominee — /Yit Motion f Xi 2nd Vice-Chairperson Nominee ( 7r 72,1 Motion � � 2nd Second Vice-Chairperson cc Nominee Motion G L Al 2nd (2---3 et OA v = 4,4Y AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: September 18, 2002 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Dough Randolph at 243-7127 (voice), or 243-7199 (TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ELECTION OF OFFICERS III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. Caribe Café, 814 & 816 East Atlantic Avenue, Marina Historic District, Jeff Falconer & Mike Weston, Owners. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class ll Site Plan Modification for the conversion from retail to restaurant and the installation of canvas awnings. B. Kyros Development, Inc. 21 SW 1st Avenue, OSSHAD, Mike Presley, Authorized Agent. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff V. ADJOURN cUW L\Y-‘, Wendy Shay, Hi�oric Preservation Planner POSTED ON: September 13, 2002 I HISTORIC PRESERVATIONBOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: September 18, 2002 AGENDA ITEM: Ill. A. ITEM: Caribe Café (814 & 816 East Atlantic Avenue, Marina Historic District)-Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class II Site Plan Modification for the conversion from retail to restaurant and the installation of canvas awnings. I —j j a a . o ^Z� N.E. 2ND ST. GENERAL DATA: — a . 111 tz ! W Owner Jeff Falconer& Mike —_ ! 1 ! II i! —} N.E. 1ST CI. I Weston : I H H !! J Q _ Applicant Delray Awning, Inc. I Agent Donald C. Day 1 , Location West side of Northwest 5th N.E. 1ST ST.1 17, Avenue, approximately 260' -a Z VETERANS south of Martin Luther King = ! PARK ATLANTIC I Jr. Drive. — PLAZA —roperty Size 0.15 Acres Future Land Use Map CC (Commercial Core) Current Zoning CBD (Central Business Z , j j District) ATLANTIC AVENUE Adjacent Zoning North: CBD (Central Business i 11 1 1 I I,1I! o i , District) & OSR (Open Space — ! g and Recreation) - East: CBD (Central Business - <—' District) — BAR y HARBOUR South: CBD (Central Business — ; CONDO .— ` . J District) �`y S.E. 1ST ST 1 Q West: CBD (Central Business ¢ ' I ' N I- District) _ _— 07 Existing Land Use Restaurant 1 Q Proposed Land Use Conversion from retail to — o restaurant and the v) ! 0 installation of canvas Q r' S.E. 2ND ST. Ct awnings. II] Water Service Existing on site. ,. z sEACATE Sewer Service Existing on site. _ — TOWERS S.E. 3RD ST. N m III.A. DELRAI'BEACH DEU1 YBFACH b:thri bated HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT 1993 1993 2001 2001 Agent: Jeff Falconer& Mike Weston, Owners Project Name: Caribe Cafe Project Location: 814 & 816 East Atlantic Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Class II Site Plan Modification for Caribe Cafe, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The subject property is known as the Handelsman Property (802-840 E. Atlantic Avenue) which includes 3 existing buildings and associated parking areas. The property is located on the south side of East Atlantic Avenue just west of the Intracoastal Waterway, within the Marina Historic District, and is zoned Central Business District (CBD). The proposal involves a portion of the center building (814 E. Atlantic Avenue) and a portion of the east building (816 E. Atlantic Avenue, known as the Boyd Building). Constructed in 1931, the center building is of the Mission Revival style. The Boyd (east building) was constructed in 1939 and is of the Masonry Vernacular style. The contributing buildings are designated historic as a part of the Marina Historic District. The subject property has an extensive land use history. The following are the most recent land use actions to occur on the property. On July 17, 1991, the HPB (Historic Preservation Board) approved site plan modifications for the 30 space parking lot expansion as well as a 1,755 sq.ft. deck addition. On February 19, 1992, the HPB approved a minor site plan modification to allow construction of a 5' X 150' dock with crosswalks. On September 20, 1995, the Historic Preservation Board approved a minor site plan modification request for Busch's Restaurant to construct a 1,844 sq.ft. dining deck addition along with installation of paver blocks and landscaping within Marine Way/Canal Street. The proposal involved a modification to the off-site parking agreement and execution of a license agreement which were subsequently approved by the City Commission on October 13, 1995. On October 16, 1996, the HPB approved a minor site plan modification to construct a 355 sq.ft. addition to the rear of the existing retail building immediately east of the Blue Anchor (subject bay). On January 22, 1997, the HPB approved a site plan modification for the Blue Meeting Date: September 18,2002 Agenda Item: II.B. HPB Staff Report Caribe Cafe—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 2 Anchor Pub to increase their outdoor seating area and enclose a breezeway (425 sq.ft additional floor area). The associated improvements have been completed. On July 24, 2002, a building permit was issued for the interior improvements associated with changing the use from retail to restaurant to accommodate a proposed restaurant Caribe Café. At its meeting of August 7, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board approved the installation of vinyl signage for the proposed restaurant. A Class II site plan modification has been submitted for the change of use from retail to restaurant to ensure that proper parking has been appropriated, and is now before the Board for action. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL The development proposal consists of the following: ➢ Conversion of a portion of the two contributing buildings (1,176 sq. ft.) from retail space to restaurant. The center building at 814 E. Atlantic Avenue, consists of a total of 477 sq. ft. delineated as restaurant area while the east building at 816 E. Atlantic Avenue, will consist of a total of 699 sq. ft. of restaurant area.; ➢ Installation of a 207 sq. ft. outdoor/courtyard dining area between the two buildings; ➢ Installation of a shed and dome style canvas awnings between the buildings; and, ➢ Installation of a 31" x 30" concrete slab to accommodate an ice machine. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(b), a Class II site plan modification is a modification to a site plan which requires no review of the Performance Standards found in LDR Section 3.1.1, but requires action by a Board. LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings): Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), formal findings are not required for a Class I or II modification. SITE PLAN MODIFICATION ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall be specifically addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development proposal. LDR Section 4.4.13 Central Business District (CBD): HPB Staff Report Caribe Cafe—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 3 Parking Requirement Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(G)(1)(d), the parking requirement for restaurants located within the CBD zoning district is established at six (6) spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area. As the subject bays were established as retail floor area only the difference in parking between the retail (1/300 sq.ft.) and restaurant (6/1,000 sq.ft.) parking ratios need to be provided. However, any new or additional use area, such as the outdoor dining area is calculated at 6 spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. Accordingly, the conversion of the 1,176 square feet of retail floor area and the new 207 sq.ft. of outdoor dining area between the buildings require a total of 4.378 or five (5) parking spaces. With the parking lot expansion in 1991, 23 excess spaces were provided. With approval of the 1,844 sq.ft. deck addition on September 20, 1995, 7 of those spaces were utilized towards meeting the parking requirement, leaving 16 excess spaces. The proposed modifications in 1996 and 1997 utilized and reduced the excess spaces to 11. Thus, there is parking available to accommodate the proposal. In the past there have been concerns raised by the residential neighborhood to the south regarding inadequate parking on this site to accommodate restaurant uses, especially during evening hours. Information was provided with previous proposals regarding the manner in which the parking is managed between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., and 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. This information included valet parking, designation of parking spaces for specific businesses, and off-site parking agreements. The south portion of the parking lot is designated for use by Busch's Restaurant. Except for the designated spaces at the south half of the property, all the parking spaces are available between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The majority of the businesses within this block are closed after 5:00 p.m., except for restaurants i.e. Blue Anchor Pub and Busch's Restaurant, and now Caribe Cafe. The Blue Anchor Pub has obtained an off-site parking agreement with Northern Trust Bank to utilize their 32 parking spaces between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Busch's Restaurant will utilize a majority of the on-site spaces during the evening hours via valet parking. However, to accommodate the 5 parking spaces required for the proposed addition, 5 parking spaces currently designated for Busch's (stenciled or signed), must not be reserved and must be made available to all the businesses within this development, especially to the Caribe Café restaurant, including the evening hours. This is attached as a condition of approval. Proposed Restaurant Use Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(B)(3), services and facilities including restaurants, excluding those with drive-in and drive-through services, are permitted within the Central Business District. It is notedthat restaurants located within 300' of residentially-zoned property-and which are open after 12:00 midnight require conditional use approval [ref. LDR Section 4.3.3(VV). The applicant has indicated the hours of operation will not extend beyond 12:00 midnight. HPB Staff Report Caribe Cafe-Class II Site Plan Modification Page 4 Open Space The proposal requires the elimination of a landscape area to accommodate an ice machine. Pursuant to Section 4.4.13(F)(2), within those sections of the CBD zoning district located within the original boundaries of the Downtown Development Authority as described in Section 8.2.2(B) which encompasses a block north and south of Atlantic Avenue, between Swinton Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway, there shall be no minimum open space requirement. However, there are other landscape areas provided on the property in the parking area as well as the rear of the buildings. Lighting Lighting has been provided with previous site plan approval for the retail space. No change in exterior lighting is necessary or proposed at this time. DESIGN ELEMENTS/ANALYSIS Design Elements LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7) and (E)(8) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non- contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. HPB Staff Report Caribe Cafe—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 5 • The proposal involves the installation of two awnings. Both are constructed of aluminum framing with canvas coverings and lie adjacent to one another. The first awning, located along the walkway between the two buildings, will be covered in red canvas and measures 6' (72") wide by 16' (192") long and will project approximately 1'6" (18") from the building. The second awning, located over the ice machine, will be made of black canvas and measures 3'4" (40") in width, 6'6" (78") in length, and will project 3'4" (40") from the facade. The proposed canvas awnings are pragmatic in design, are consistent with those found in the area, and are in keeping with the scale and massing of the buildings. The proposed colors are appropriate in their contextual relationship and compliment the restaurant's logo design. The awning's appearance is compatible with the styles of the historic buildings as well as the existing appurtenances of the buildings. It is noted that the proposal does not include screening for the proposed ice machine. As it will be located between the two buildings and visible from the right-of-way, screening must be provided, such as decorative lattice/PVC fencing and is attached as a condition of approval. Positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation provided the condition of approval is addressed. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal is associated with the change of use from retail to restaurant. The proposed change in use will increase the required parking and the proposed awnings will not significantly affect the exterior design elements of the buildings. The proposed shed and dome style awnings are consistent with and are complimentary to the style of the structure and can therefore be supported with positive findings. The development proposal will be consistent with the policies of Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan. There is sufficient parking to accommodate the change of use and proposed outdoor dining area, provided 5 of the spaces designated for Busch's are made available for all the businesses within this development. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA and the associated Class II site plan modification and design elements for the Caribe Café, 814 & 816 E. Atlantic Avenue, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA and associated Class II site plan modification and design elements for the Caribe Café, 814 & 816 E. Atlantic Avenue, with the basis stated. HPB Staff Report Caribe Cafe—Class II Site Plan Modification Page 6 RECOMMENDATION Class II Site Plan Modification Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class II site plan modification for the Caribe Cafe, based upon positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, subject to the following condition: 1) That the stenciling or signage on at least 5 of the parking spaces designated for Busch's, which are in close proximity to the subject restaurant be available to all the businesses, including evening hours. Design Elements Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated design elements for the Caribe Cafe, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8), the City's Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed ice machine be screened with lattice or PVC fencing. Attachments: • Proposed Site Plan • Survey • Awning Details Staff Report Prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation P lanner > 0 0 �' Q L / 1 1 a z z ¢ g _ - > > _ >- v 0 0 '1 OD CO • z 2 • �`' . THOMAS ST. N.E. �` 2ND ST. Z I CL -w ' • Li! > ^ .- —¢ o o 1 1 J DRIVE D Z Z N.E. 1ST CT. w z > — } x Q _ 2 2 R - ✓� fn In — I LOWRY STREET - NI. 1ST ST. = Li u.3 I- Q Q z DELRAY VETERANS 1- PARK SUMMIT N CONDO w ATLANTIC \ NJ I- � //�PLAZA , \ ce cfl CO a BARR w — TERRACE SPANISH z 1'_w w CONDO RIVER T z` z�_ RESORT ATLANTIC AVENUE 1 i [ ,„„ I,:i.:i.:i.:i.1 Ill WATERWAY EAST )) — VI COMMERCIAL CONDO • w w a a HA BR o a & CONDO J I — S.E. 1ST ST. MIRAMAR STREET _> FIDELITY j tr- (igi -' FEDERAL < �. J_ BANKIaCT) o D = ri= 2 st Icfl Q z w J 0IN O W 0 CC Vi 1 — • S.E. 2NDl ST. 1 INGRAHAM AVENUE — 1 iii ,___. L z SEA GA TE CFAN TERR —w — TOWERS —0 11 IV e -„...._ CARIBE CAFE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL 814 EAST ATLANTIC AVENUE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM645 G O phase I phase fY N a I 0" BUILDING-L BUILDING.2 L to B fl C.Ailamic Art gl6 C.Atlantic Ave. a single story non 8 _.__ 1_= r =1M = C- -r —1�lIII ik I IlI)I k.51.0 LOCAT ION OIr NEW ItI!S'1'At1RANr Ll� — 5 e.rercm:m.e rn,m r.i:r..;rr.e rnmr y...a..rm "Joh''Imo fn. adjacent uo.e from m.,, _ _— AILAMICAVE_ -- — - ' o z; — e d �0) d ko 8 a cn - oo M ri'M `S 0 �DI?MO ,;4 z g W W ----7 ' ll Demo rcstnnm .....N .......• SFE'E PLAN EXISTING PLAN o XI a, Cri II General Builinding Code Analysis >, I.occupancy classineailon:assembly A group NI per chapter 3 p '. o 2.existing constntalontype:Type IV,unprotected per chapter 6 3 v °a . a. 3.means of egress:(chapter la) 4 o 4.occupant load:58 dining space plus 5 staff equal 63 total EX-1 • i - - _ n x °z > _ i V L> o c z _ 75 I _a o z_ I . g n I _ _ . - o a C a - I - n - I n I ti _ 1otlI I z : z �i I al l n .------/ I-,�; '�' 1 - _* I , / L' _ _ , :_ ��-I is 101 n 1 '' 1 I . . , /,,-_., ,i ,, , , ii wx �y�.�. I 1 3 £A' n n 1 n s I 1211 1CFO 1= L— L S �� i 1 I E. I � nn nnn ,-t ,- _ I FO �I 1 1 • 11 drawn by: Santiaco Boliv New Cafe Santiago Bolivar P.E. �: CARIBE CAFE da Consulting Engineers, (9 4)427-0711 scale:1/4"=1' 814 E.Atlantic Ave. r-+ 2436 N.Federal HWY,Suite 5200, Licht house Point FL job no: Delray Beach, Florida, 33483 • .9 0 a 0 0 0 n r r--1 0 General Notes ri p 11eet.Iil.+ni.lrn tied c.rulenioe fell le,pl iuuior.,ld, rl p•p Fillers al.classified Wile type S Mew" Yk FitesopptudnuUnder square Under permit mil 00 '2. /1 o, C/1 Oruttice.Supply sad eehrml sue Initilocled File mode tenchnerhrun hu conlivn It optic. t24 y and supply fan to stop.flood eeh rout fan shall°pee ate Q. q Hood Air Velocities rpm Ow urination mil vb..tad sands is off.. 'WI > qq exhaust CPM/linear pa.(Min 280 CPO) MI en o •- (min) 7.5'a 280=2,100 CPM actual = 2,280 CPM M o Pace area=Ott'x 46"/441=29 sq ft ° oG c•a pn U CI Face velocity=2,280/46=78.6 PPM Duct area = 15 v 14/ 141= 1.46 sq ft Duct velocity = 3,310 11.16= 1,561 PPM Fans Mfg Model CPM S.P. I1P Voltage RI'M Amps Die 10' I uhn°41.° i� •e'pl'ly fnn OP-1 Dayton 7A620 2280 .25 .5 lls 1300 10 15 --��— r--1 :d a.r.°en,h 16 ar ante nut nvnL�nu,wdJ tel SP-1 Dayton 10505 2056.375.5 115 535 10 15 �� — .mr.lrnlell..s„Ipinl /J 10.,- miniai 14.supply ui.o M.anlvc.d,W.nchace > •C EF-I installed with hinged access and grease container le• ewe corned and intermediate os 0 C— mares I J y U ("7' Keep kitchen at.01 negative pressure learn adjacent rooms N Cj" 03 1. W 6 t» �T 26• '�„ J 'u 3.. ,pace q.R' 6• between hood and wnll erlatinp to tit tl,e tiled tall 6'6 \ 9•6'.Ide SS lack loll licit > 0 0 IY1 0 jl •or Kitchen Sectional View rn 11 p 0 '-" o 3 a3 �. ° b y o M-I i I R 4. _ X I' a I 1 VNIXI Vie ° I Ig I I g n I , i n Ind - i ' I °—' 4 ICI I 1 c rs n I s IaQ I ;--- I o ' J 1 -{-, .. 7. i 1 Ii- n owl nib .1 I DID it �i I �I I E F 1 drawn by: Sannago Boliv New Cafe Y Santiago Bolivar P.E. mdate: CARBBE CAFE Consulting Engineers, (954) 427-0711 scale:1/4"=1' 814 E.Atlantic Ave. 2436 N.Federal HWY,Suite 11200, Light house Point FL job no: Delray Beach,Florida, 33483 .N NEW panel"A"WUXI 1) P.r Wile No. (ole lop Ucsc Load(VA) wire No. Pole loop Doc Luad(VA) 8 1 2 40 Cued 8I00 6 2 2 40 AIIU(w/5 kw local) O (7400) J _ 4 Alit)(cooling) 3600 12 5 2 20 hot water healer 3600 12 6 I 20 supply fun 2000 7 12 8 I 20 exhaust fan 2000 ^O -1 12 9 I 20 steam table 2000 12 10 I 20 1r¢7er 2000 N 12 11 1 20 recepbmle 1200 12 12 1 20 sandwich unit 1200 V S 12 IJ 1 20 kitchen 111:hting 1500 12 _I4 1 20 Lighting 1200 phase 1 ph0se 2 F. E. 12 15 I 20 dislrw0.sher 2000I2 16 1lir—Ice machine 2000 1 '� 1 N —12— 17—r— 20 regincr 600 total=33300/210=(39 amps III ° IL) 47 eq W c1-1 Ili •A 2 vz, O M el WJaeenl sl«e Boni Ci �- �,`lr•�� Cj `" L }) Q _ , U 1_,,,,f," A ..aimm.o.e rc lce existing 100 amp panel w/new 200 amp panelm shownDw 1 — m ll • . �• D m i� No -J M nnu, ❑ LS p Rana! Diu r �Jp�s i I) • — [(HIU:R aid^ C' kll d o AJ/0 in 2'EMT(RUN ABOVE ROOP) 9 IIAND SINK u replace existing 100 amp diconnect w/new 200 disconnect1 CO • (13 e4 '� W Contractor to ceordin0te service shutdown and upgrademcterxv/FM as required F — b [' z 5 .W T T RISER DIAGRAM(Bldg 1) — I _ �� W A �'� �� c`� -lam�3 Q ._ �_� l --_-_ . h •n 'NL•o11115V 15 AMP ctacurts N i n 0 N G X. Power Plan ico.,pdi,caa tY%,,„r, E-1 existing service 0 0 0 4 pp phase I I phase 2 C7 O :r -4 /caret II I .y ow n.n,e— 1 I p,,.m.,..0 d - � z^•5�----r. 1•;rS"n—.�\'l -1V-1 a 1�_w.- „K .,M r[ M stlIrteent Vole front , N c., c ________ No ,...........,.., I.duol uap to resist 2.tank ma J moo C 'J C 3.one• ay Juanouts rcain poMnWn when meclately -i1 L�7-' C 117 ].one•why cic.rcwu will be Inslullcd LmnMimdy upslrtmn and Jownrvaun of prcaw nap aunt / U M i DORLB W 4.all cnno cle to lw]500 pal min. II r CYIOIJ:R M f� V. Grease trap detail 6� II a ( IIANOSINK l TIIRCRCONPAR'ndpur SINK i el I 1 [ U WW f"� FD m ¢ FS — <' - 'l, g W PO IIf�NINY I — L_• l ap �7 n Nr4""17, her ll.eia+f ianil ..l.aenf ` LI & NTih(!NISI=•N Vft/TI- I, Q _ U I� 750 t.l hattll sink _ Q nd11.`,to a.l.�lnp.e+cal nliillVA5111!it .__..__-- Il tY V•_l P4 a A'pvi y. \ 4 11':DI�KItiIINfII'IIie1111Nr1la+IlNli\VII%'111111:4 hI wl alnk \. :we � of lollop vrnl es,?,'VI!NC aniarenl more 7n.4 __—__:__ —_1 _. O il wC -yQ wrote connection rn -II 2. SQ A CrO q ^� O p7 Plumbing Plane o to sewer Isonietr"T'•BLDG 2 D 1 L Isometric BLDG 1 n. 1 •r F1 B R/C AWNINGS r 1.\ / -is . ..., 0 . Y 16.._ • '. 1111111166....IS i „ ..NisioNiii • • . . :..• 7 . Gs.,0 ' 6 _A ti % FoR: Gac,16e: G,,,=s :,j: b\IN- C\-`A..-z.C.. (ate,: y r'- 1, : . 11ELIi tY AWNING, INC. : .\ • 80 North Congress Avenue•Dolr ,Florida 33d•15 Phonn(lid I)2/I—iii _ EAST ATLANTIC AVENUE _ 1 _ PAVED . i I o • h O O T r-0.7'CONC. CURB I NORTH OF LINE OF BLOCK IJ3 L b., 1 —a-��. BRICK WALK(PLANTERS NOT SHOWN) ;F:si RIGHT OF IVAY LINE N• 50.0' ¢ .t ,,,,.., ,, ,zic,, ti _ v :),:nol � J ,IIIU , JU W FL�W.�-( Aw..t...qI v . 1, 2fi3 W STOPY 1 S^DRY �v I � _, COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL pp ¢o^ \ \ BU!LDIjJG i4� '' i BUILDING �o;� U j I FA'^ 0 38 � V r?, ( II zo o '1 L... ,. 3; Vl I'Sc.a .J L_ I -. I` m^�c:''/' BRICK ,., ,• 22.,,,,, 3.9�\ I 'CONo. WAC .Q.69'S6 I CONC. I i ^ �\ \ • `CONC. L�J`/CNPAO I1 1:1-I \ I —0.6'CONC.CURB ij Pq VEO \PARKING II (TYPf;AL) ' • 4 i \ U i L`qT 48 I LOf 49 1LOT 50 \I LOT 51 1LOT/52 1 l'.1 \ 1 \ 0 • :EASE PARKING SPACE I• PAVED . I IO1 2O ip ® ® I 9 O Val rp- Li ANCNORS I �` POLES ELECTRIC f e METER PANEL PAVED PARKING d PAVED PARKING LOT 56 i 1 4 1 J 3-1. __ _ -EAST A TLANT/C A VENUE_ iPAVED 4 c 0.7'CONC. CURB NORTH OF LINE OF BLOCK IJJ LEGEND: �..�.�.._.r._ —rrC:P. o El BRICK WALK(PLANTERS Nor SHOWN) r: L-S RIGHT OF WAY LINE r = CENTERLINE —4 I i -I--- ""' I CONC. = CONCRETE 30.0' Y'I""•P ,T,.,y„rrrrT� IGtO Je}2' U W.M. = WATER METER ' .Y �~ OZ = NUMBER OF LEASE PARKING SPACE - ^ i 2 3 — — = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES �ov�+ iTOJ Y ' � I "<� "COMMERCIAL I STORY L.P. = LIGHT POST COMMERCIAL ', � op uo BUILD�JG BUILDING n v`' zn� FLOOD ZONE: AE (EL 7) 3 o,3 1 o Otn I I u BRICK ??1' J9' 6.0' _ I I co,. CON. WAL .'" • -.y6 I DESCRIPTION: CONC. /c PAD / A PORTION OF LOTS 48, 49, 50 AND 51, LESS \ P THE NORTH 7 FEET THEREOF AND A PORTION r-o.6'CO CURD OF LOT 56, PALM SQUARE, AN UNRECORDED PLAT V E D PARKING I (TYPIpAL) BEING A SUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 125 AND 133, \ 4 ORIGINAL TOWN OF LINTON (NOW DELRAY BEACH), c'2.}.1 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. L\ 1T 48 I LOf 49 1LOT 50 LOT 51 ILOT,52 \ I I I / \ I EISE YAKKING SPACE''I IO O O O ID Q O PAVED PAf KING l --vE-p — -EF,5--� CE 11rTl— — — S} ANCHORS �� POLES ELECTRIC b METER PANEL •ci PAVED PARKING a PAVED PARYI1r(i MAP OF AS i T SURVEY \- LOT 56 J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE DLLRAYREACM DLLRAYREACH bald HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 1IIF MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT �II� 1993 1993 2001 2001 Agent: Mike Presley, Authorized Agent Project Name: Kyros Development, Inc. Project Location: 21 SW 1st Avenue, OSSHAD ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a free-standing sign associated with Kyros Development, Inc., pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND Located on Lot 6, Block 61, the frame vernacular building was constructed in 1940 and originally located at 41 S.W. 1st Avenue. The building consists of gable roof lines, multi-light fenestration, a fireplace, and hardwood floors. The Claude Sellers family (Mr. Sellers was a respected Delray carpenter) originally owned the residence and the cottage. The dwelling was relocated, due to development of the parking lot associated with the Sundy Inn/Restaurant, and placed at this site in 1999. At its meeting of June 20, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board approved a COA for a change of roof material, replacement of windows, an exterior color change, and the enclosure of the porte-cochere for the building, with the condition that the replacement windows be a Colonial style with an 8/8 light configuration. On August 15, 2001, the HPB approved (7-0) with conditions COA 468 and the associated site plan, landscape plan, and building elevations to convert the structure from a residence to an office. In conjunction with the COA, the Board approved a waiver request to allow parking in the front yard of the building. The improvements have been installed and the applicant is now before the Board for review and approval of a sign. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is to install a free-standing sign in order to highlight the site's identity as well as its future tenants. The proposed sign will be constructed of plywood. Design elements include a subtle arch design at the top of the sign body with post supports. Meeting Date:September 18,2002 Agenda Item: III.B. Kyros Development, Inc. September 18,2002 Page 2 The body of the sign will be painted white with teal lettering. Teal posts with pink accents compliment the colors on the existing building. The street address and name of the establishment will be presented in vinyl lettering (caps and lower-case in teal) at the top of the sign with a wood directory consisting of two panels with teal vinyl copy on white (below) for tenant recognition. The free-standing sign measures 5'0" (60") wide, 7'0" (84") in height including post supports. The facing of the sign measures 3'-11 '/4" (47 '/") and will be installed in the landscape area north of the driveway. The sign will be double-faced installed perpendicular to the adjacent building. The sign will be set back approximately 4' from the west (front) property line. Visibility issues have been addressed by placing the sign at this location. No lighting is proposed at this time. ANALYSIS The Board shall consider: SIGN REGULATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(1)(b) addresses Sign Design Standards for "Free-standing signs" A free-standing sign is not affixed to any other structure. It may be either a pole sign or a monument sign. Neither the pole nor the base of the monument shall be considered in calculation of the area of the sign face. A free-standing sign may not have more than two faces. LDR Section 4.6.7 (G)(2)(b) addresses "Conformity with Surroundings" and states: The scale of the sign, in terms of area, shall be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be painted and the neighborhood and streetscape where it is to be located; but in no case shall it exceed the height limitations set forth in Subsection (7). LDR Section 4.6.7 (H)(2)(a)-(c) addresses "Aesthetic Qualifications and Standards" The aesthetic quality of a building, or indeed of an entire neighborhood, is materially affected by achieving visual harmony of the sign on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture or the building or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical limitations on signs imposed in Subsections (G) and (I), the following aesthetic conditions must be met. Scale: The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is located or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. Scale shall also be considered in terms of Subsection (E) with respect to height and area. Kyros Development, Inc. September 18,2002 Page 3 Garishness: The overall effect of the configuration of color of a sign shall not be garish. "Garish" signs are those that are too bright or gaudy, showy, glaring, and/or cheaply brilliant or involving excessive ornamentation. Conflict: The colors of a sign shall not conflict with other signs already on the building or in the immediate vicinity. Design Guidelines The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following pertaining to signage: Sign design and placement in an historic district or a historic site is an important element. While preservationists believe the building façade is the best sign an owner may have, the need for design guidelines refines the existing regulations adapting them to the particular character of the specific location and site. The district's character is maintained when signage does not cause visual disruption. The sign should not obscure any architectural feature or detail, or interface with the views and appreciation of the building. Signage should compliment and not overwhelm or compete with the architecture. A list of suggestions then follows, the two operatives in this instance are: • Sign style should reflect the appropriate architectural periods. • Sign dimensions should be in proportion to the building's size. • Appropriately designed lighted signs enhance a district. However, the exterior source of the lighting should be concealed. Conclusion The proposed signage conveys the identity of the establishment and promotes its tenants while complimenting the color and design of the building. The minimal design is appropriate in relation to the signage in the area and in proportion to the scale and massing of the building. The sign height will be 7' with an area of approximately 20 sq. ft. Per LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(3)(d), as the building is located within the Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), the sign may be placed within the front yard setback(4' setback provided) and meets the standards for maximum sign height (12') and area (30 sq. ft.), per LDR Section 4.6.7(G)(7). The sign will be situated so that it does not encroach into the 20' sight visibility triangle. Based on this analysis, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7 and the City's Design Guidelines. Kyros Development, Inc. September 18,2002 Page 4 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA for the installation of a sign at 21 SW 1st Avenue, Kyros Development, Inc., based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7., and the City's Design Guidelines. C. Deny the COA for the installation of a sign at 21 SW 1st Avenue, Kyros Development, Inc. with basis stated. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a sign at 21 SW 1st Avenue, Kyros Development, Inc., based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7., and the City's Design Guidelines. Attachments: • Survey • Sign Details ' . I 1 I r,-,--,. ,-tl?..k•IM-.1.,!-,,.-!-7- L".%./!,,I •- ' NEW 1.CN.T.SiDpvALx I .0...OPI SODUAK .I I I \ - =VC la 5.COC- . • _______17 __,......4•=7),u< / = i 1 \\. K.' --s"•-•-•-...-..- - ‘\Tc.,'''''l IC CYCNO=110•C KAKI KS LOC/C7:1•I 1.11 ..- V"."24i Cr TOZ•Wt. 'I I .• I • • , -ri\ED 2.11)0> (i—r I '\ I SIGN'.t-- I II \\ \‘. : , i/ . .. . r rtl.0 't• '1\---6- i I I . i •, UNDS:P . I i I .,. ! I , .,. .. [ ... ''V;e• !,,,...e. \ ..; ..1:e, „ I I , - v... 8 l 0 C K 67 - \ , , i\ .___. \ \\ •2.:"". N' , . '..\ I \ \ •c\ • i ,-1.--- . \ 1•. , 1 \ , i \....,...------- ', • I FOR SiC PJ.0; i nt, I I- SUE UGhTINC , •\ - - CUR?-.- ' , ....„........--1------• i.,/,,,,..^ .1k. -,. , .. . .-.. .. ):::".: -.8.::' ,.. 1 • . z, / '/// /r 'c.,-./../ . ...;-:•,‘,7:P`;: :‘ ?;../3...., ..,.,- c 7...-.,,,-.2-0::!=„15:?5::-,'-',/.., • WC RAZ'. LL-'SEE DT. 1— vio - ‘, ,///7/ ,///,/,:22'))/:'•'''' .::-.' ''.%;'Nc.11,%.:. ._ .!.7%,..6,/,77/.///' .,..-..",..;.•.>,,,,.T.,fs, ,:,^,1,,,,,,,,, 1---. I EC TRussrnDr: I c.) in 1 i LTJ RODE IAULCH ,:- t Li) I s PATHWAY TO PARKING t.f...:-..'..: t,:' ‘,..:.:-.:' I FROM TRAsH RECT. !-',..:'.2,,.:.-, -A,-.,;(!.-;!.;,...!,,,,,...., ...- I. tAREA .:>!•-<>:.':-.1.`„; ,:::;;; lel,BRIL%PATh ...i, • .;P° 1 I - t-I, Lt.- 1TRASH RECEFTACL. Tt`'.::::'`?..-_„-::-..;::' & ." % 1 1 4'HT.WD.FENCE , t t,',S•t.t,'••2.....,:,C;;; ,:tt':',.:.; .00'. -,-,7 s. ..- liF.A-OFFICE A I \ , I • f . 1 i i \, •....-- _,,,'". \e, o - ,,-, ..&4.,I I T TO CORNER 'PROVIDE 4-CONC 7,7_,...=,........:---;,0.sri," r RECEPTION ARE, . T. .AF C,CORNER !I .,,t' , e %.• t : ,: 14- NEw OFFCE C . ... 0 .-- .03` ,,....,..1.1 - . es- - CONFERENCE ROOm ----,,,,, i . ,--.,::,;,...-::;,.;,;-;',.;,•.;,. ..,.;:., ....---- „ - .- •-•='•'".,,--',',. ,,N?.:'\-..;-:. .„..).- ' ic... 1"-r ' SEIBACF:1 6 -,... NEV. oFFicE - ‘•.; ''....:-:•:,,.. .-.."„..,::::A :;2...Z, I11 • .0'-''. '...---TT,'"'',t.,.."'..S•..''-".::\;,',,'.•*::',Z; . ... ... . 1 G.—0" SETBACK ;;::::,....-;',::: ::':• , i —___ _________ :—.___ • -.‘...:;,...—. --,— ':'‘'.•/-::..".,:"•'. . I I lb":-{" . I I 2C-1 1/4.- i A I , _i !::-..- ,:N.: •,‘ I ... Is:A- - , I I -..,_. -g I 7 6 I -_'' i:.:...•-::::':'...•"..`,`.‘ ' ‘ ...:‘• ..ttt,_ 0, ! .--.... Scale: 1 " = 1 FOOT Bright _Image 5'_0" — SIGN SYSTEMS COMW:FIE c_CTlICA- )IP-AYS ViOV _"..�'�""""' COMMIiCl1-A 4. iiSI TTA-)Ec. .45 I .�'"""" "' .."" SiiVk3 i3" I'/ AW{i)WIVNIVG ,,,,,A,,,,1' , )SIGN R' I , C",, r`y'; 561-278-7814 1` • ` :t/ , ... 561.278.0259 FAX : • 't� 575 NE Id S1117 l. 4. , Development, Inc. j;1 brghtimage@emi.net art:. .dam.. • LUL Listed i9 ..I,; 4, Since 1979 .fit9 t,�x'. 21 S.W. 1st Avenue ,I �. w :' CUbTOML-{Z s g _ , eE 3 I l'u ui a Tenant J KYROS G p V r+M DEVELOPMENT r II Future Tenant J y 4 AlDATE 08-16-02 �F, DRAWN BY: « ,. 54, IMPORTANT!THIS PROOF MUST BE CHECKED FOR ALL COPY ,tA.f. ` ,, OR DESIGN ERRORS.BY SIGNING THIS PROOF,YOU AGREE ,�K .0 t • THAT IT IS CORRECT AND FREE OF ALL ERRORS AND ASSUME +tts RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CORRECTNESS. 'V"y Of" RESPONSIBILITY MAKE CORRECTIONS/NEW PROOF tii4pi M 4` ` • DRAWING PROOF OK ,.. , 1� ❑SIGNATURE DATE \ '.,.;I14r1 .1' Ury a, r.+ rs . 5i e� r ,,,`M„9y4.i.ry egi'.�t r, h, i �.i 1 .. .�. _.— ---'---- - dC„,.:. 1 � .:. ,a.- Ar,y,r'';�7+ ��.� "'t, :?.�'� .ves�F % Y. ..,',...'...,.,-..1‘,....:"., ^'.. ; NOTE_Or1DEA WILL_NOT PPACEEDyVIL}iy_ETTBA40K .�•. 4 .... ` . j � '�• �� .... �.,, •• , A SIGNED PROOF MUST BESUBMITTEDII 1 OR PROOFS NOTE.Due to limitations of the printing process, ARE FURNISHED FREE OF CHARGE WITH YOURORDER. P 9 THERE IS AS20 CHARGE FOR EACH ADDITIONAL PROOF. printed colors can vary from actual colors. ©Bright Image,Ino 1999 This is an original,unpublished drawing,submitted with a project we are planning for you.Its not to be copied,reproduced,exhibited or shown to anyone outside your organization wittmutwritten permission of Bright Image,Inc. MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 2, 2002 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary Lou Jamison, Gloria Elliott, Jim Keavney, Francisco Perez-Azua, Rhonda Sexton (arrived 6:05). MEMBERS ABSENT: Gail Lee McDermott, Bill Branning, STAFF PRESENT: Michelle Hoyland, Loretta Heussi II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS At this time the Chairperson explained that the meeting shall be held according to quasi-judicial hearing procedures. Ms. Hoyland recommended that Item II.C., the Ruby Residence be moved to the II.A. of the agenda due to time constraints. It was moved by Ms. Elliott, seconded by Mr. Perez and passed 4-0 to amend the agenda. Ms. Heussi swore in all witnesses wishing to speak. Ms. Hoyland inquired about ex-parte communication. None was disclosed. A. Ruby Residence, 714 NE 2nd Avenue, Del-Ida Park, Ben & Susan Ruby, Owners. Action Before the Board: Consideration of a COA for the installation of a gazebo in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Ms. Hoyland entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. 10/2/02 Ben Ruby, owner, was present to represent the project and stated that he agreed with the staff report. It was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 5-0 to approve the COA for a gazebo at 714 NE 2nd Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. B. Jagger Residence, 275 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Cliff Jagger, Owner. Action Before the Board: Consideration of a COA and associated Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan for the conversion of a single family home at 275 N. Swinton Avenue to retail, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. Mr. Keavney stated that he consulted with Mr. Jagger a year ago but did not work on the project. Ms. Hoyland entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. She stated that there was a concern by the City Engineer over the installation of the mulch parking lot though mulch had been previously approved for other projects. Mulch is considered a maintenance and liability issue and staff therefore recommended an alternate material. She further added a technical item which required the refuse container to accommodate recyclables. Cliff Jagger, owner, was present to represent the project. A discussion ensued about the location of the refuse container. Ms. Hoyland recommended that it be located out of view of the right-of-way. The Board and the applicant concurred. Mr. Jagger inquired about the requirement of a pollution prevention plan. Ms. Hoyland explained that it is a new engineering requirement to contain debris from construction. Mr. Jagger further inquired about the installation of a mulch parking lot. Ms. Hoyland explained in detail staffs concerns over the material and use of the property. Ms. Jamison inquired about the difference in price between the mulch and pea rock. -2- HPB Minutes 10/02/02 Mr. Jagger was not certain. Ms. Hoyland stated that the same subgrade is required for an alternate materials as would be for mulch. Ms. Sexton inquired about whether the "D" curbing and drainage would be required. Ms. Hoyland confirmed that both would be required. Mr. Perez inquired about ADA accessibility from the sidewalk on NE 3rd Street. Ms. Hoyland stated that a paved sidewalk could be added as an additional condition of approval. A detailed discussion ensued regarding the location and design of the ADA accessible ramp. Ms. Sexton inquired about the existing fencing and whether the location of the proposed fencing is appropriate. Ms. Hoyland clarified the LDR regulations regarding fence height and location. Site Plan After much discussion, it was moved by Mr. Perez, seconded by Mr. Keavney and passed 5-0 to approve the COA for the Class V Site Plan for 275 N. Swinton Avenue, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), Section 2.4.5(F)(5) and Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That a photometric plan be submitted along with a detail of the decorative site lighting fixture(s) and that their locations be indicated on the site and landscape plans. 3) That the site plan must be revised to show the relocation of the utilities underground. 4) That the mulch parking surface be eliminated and pavers or pea rock be provided which includes a base course and meets drainage and grading standards acceptable to the City Engineering Department. -3- HPB Minutes 10/02/02 5) That the fence along the north property line adjacent to the parking area be relocated to the interior edge of the landscape strip and reduced to no more than 3' in height to comply with the 20' sight visibility requirement or that the fence be completely removed. If the fence is replaced with another style or material other than what currently exists on site, the applicant must return to the Board for review and approval. 6) That handicap access be provided from the public sidewalk to the building. Landscape Plan It was moved by Ms. Elliott, seconded by Ms. Sexton and passed 5-0 to approve the COA for the Landscape Plan for 275 N. Swinton Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16 subject to the following condition: 1) That a five foot (5') landscape strip be provided between the off-street parking area and the right-of-way. At this time, Mr. Perez stepped down from the Board. C. 310 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Francisco Perez, Authorized Agent. Action Before the Board: Consideration of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 310 N. Swinton Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F). Ms. Jamison inquired if any Board member wished to disclose any ex parte communications on this item. There were none. Ms. Hoyland entered the project file into the record and presented the item to the Board. Andy Spengler and Mr. Perez were present to represent the project. Mr. Spengler stated that the building encroaches into the alley and he discussed his concern over dedicating a portion of the alley already owned by the applicant. Ms. Hoyland explained the property's history and the issue of the alley abandonment in detail. Mr. Perez confirmed that the alley is owned by local property owners and not by the City. He further requested additional information regarding the conditions of approval. Ms. Jamison inquired about the site lighting. -4- HPB Minutes 10/02/02 Mr. Perez presented the information. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the waiver request to allow six parking spaces to be located within the front yard between the building and the street. Waivers It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 4-0 to approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3) to allow six parking spaces to be located within the front yard between the building and the street. It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 4-0 to approve the waiver to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), to reduce the required landscape strip on the north and south sides of the parking area from five feet (5') to four feet (4') along the north property line and three and a half feet (3.5') along the south property line based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Site Plan It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Mr. Keavney and passed 4-0 to approve the COA for the Class V Site Plan for the 310 North Swinton Avenue, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) and Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That one-half of the cost to improve the alley adjacent to the property is provided prior to issuance of a building permit or that a waiver is obtained from the City Commission unless the issue of alley ownership is clarified to the satisfaction of staff. Landscape Plan It was moved by Ms. Sexton, seconded by Ms. Elliott and passed 4-0 to approve the COA for the Landscape Plan for the 310 North Swinton Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That a Landscape Maintenance Agreement must be executed between the City and the owner to allow landscaping to encroach into the alley if the alley exists. -5- HPB Minutes 10/02/02 At this time, Mr. Perez returned to the Board. Ill. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: None B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: Ms. Jamison inquired about the accessory structure at 610 North Ocean Boulevard and why the issue was postponed from the previous night's City Commission agenda. As the next meeting is election night, she would like to see the meeting postponed. Ms. Hoyland stated that the authorized agent should request a postponement with the City Manager. D. Staff: Ms. Hoyland stated that Mr. Gross is requesting a color change for the fence at NE 5th Court and NE 2nd Avenue. The request should be submitted for review at the next meeting. Ms. Elliott inquired about the status of Mariposa. Ms. Hoyland will pass her request on to the project planner. IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:30 P.M. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for October 2, 2002, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on August 6, 2003. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -6- HPB Minutes 10/02/02 : R.e Gz. lV l,Pqy �P AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: October 2, 2002 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 275 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Cliff Jagger, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class V Site Plan for the conversion from residential to retail. B. 310 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Wonderland Management LLC, Owner. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class V Site Plan for the conversion from residential to office. C. Ruby Residence, 714 NE 2nd Avenue, Del-Ida Park, Ben & Susan Ruby, Owners. Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a gazebo. III. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff IV. ADJOURN HPB Meeting October 2,2002 Page 2 \''(\ or\ OrNeW Wendy Shay, Hist is Preservation Planner POSTED ON: September 26, 2002 I . .. PRESERVATION HISTORIC . RESERVATIION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- NVI EETING DATE: October 2, 2002 AGENDA ITEM: II. A. ITEM: 275 North Swinton Avenue—Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class V Site Plan for the conversion from residential to retail. „ux-, 7 5TH__Si------. N.E. 6TH ST. ... :, - , ,,,, ,,,_ , ._ , 6JP GENERAL DATA: Y D LANE � O�y�N Lf- Owner/Applicant Cliff Jagger L'W Agent n/a ¢ ,`` Location Southeast corner of TRINITY N.E. 5TH`sr?��` Northeast 3rd Street and LUTHERAN I Swinton Avenue. I w Property Size 0.226 Acres LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. 4TH I ST. Future Land Use Map OMU (Other Mixed Use) POST — Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School CASON METHODIST OFFICE _ Square Historic Arts District) CHURCH _ ildjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) . :-- East: OSSHAD (Old School Square - _ Historic Arts District) _ South: OSSHAD (Old School Square N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. Historic Arts District) Cay ;�.. . West: OSSHAD (Old School Square ¢ ATTORNEY A MI - _ MI Historic Arts District) BUILDING I.im ism — Existing Land Use Single Family Residence == N -N Proposed Land Use Conversion from residential _ to retail I I ME NM I — Water Service Existing on site. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE Z N.E. 2ND ST. Sewer Service Existing on site. z 3 U > 0 w z Eg • W CITY < HALL = a N.E. 1ST S"- 3 w! z —¢ COMMUNITY CENTER TENNIS OLD STADIUM I I SCHOOL r SQUARE N I. ATLANTIC AVE. I [ H I1 I II 117171 r . II. A. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 275 N. Swinton Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class V Site Plan; and, ❑ Landscape Plan The subject property is located on the southeast corner of N. Swinton Avenue and NE 3rd Street. BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 1, Block 66 of the Strafford Atta Bowe Replat and contains a 1,763 sq. ft. contributing building, constructed in 1926 in the Mediterranean- Revival style. The site contains approximately .26 acre and lies at the southeast corner of NE 31-d Street and North Swinton Avenue in the Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). During its meeting of February 21, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved a COA request to change the exterior accent trim color from pale green to lavender on the extant historic dwelling. The applicant also requested to paint the existing awnings periwinkle blue which was also approved. The contributing dwelling was originally located at 15 NW 1st Street. At its meeting of March 15, 1995, the Board reviewed a COA application for the demolition of the building at its original location on NW 1st Street. At that time, the owner indicated an interest in relocating the building. On October 4, 1995, the Board reviewed and approved the COA application request for the relocation of the building from NW 1st Street to its current location on North Swinton Avenue. On June 17, 1998, the Board reviewed a COA associated with a Class V Site Plan (COA 347) to convert the dwelling from a single family home to the McKeever Beauty Salon. Also associated with the application was a waiver request to reduce the required right-of-way width for NE 3`d Street from 60' to 50'. Though both the Site Plan and the waiver request were approved by the Board, the conversion did not occur and the building has remained a single family home to date. The applicant currently requests the conversion of the single family dwelling to retail use and is now before the Board for consideration. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal includes the following: ❑ Conversion of the 1,763 sq. ft. contributing building from residential to retail; ❑ Construction of a six (6) space mulch parking lot that includes one asphalt handicapped space; and, •HPB Staff Report 275 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan Pbge 2 ❑ Development of a brick walkway and perimeter landscaping. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The applicable development standards that relates to the proposal is as follows: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 20' Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 25' 25' Side (Interior) 7.5' 17' Side Street(NE 3rd Street) 15' 15.3' Rear 10' 69' Open Space 25% 49.5% LDR Section 4.4.24 (OSSHAD-Special District Regulation): Parking Pursuant to LDR 4.4.24(G)(4)(a) all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. Parking is located at the rear of the property. Future use as proposed by the applicant is retail. The extant building will contain a 1,763 sq. ft space used as retail space, including both the first floor and the second floor storage area. Based on this analysis, six (6) parking spaces are required and six (6) spaces have been provided for the project including one handicapped space. Parking Surface Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(8)(a), all parking lots and parking spaces, including storage and display areas, shall be improved either with a paved surface meeting Engineering Department Standards, or with a hard surface material (such as brick or turf block on a base course laid in accordance with approved manufacturer's recommendations), or with some other type of surface material acceptable to the City Engineer. Parking lots and parking surfaces on historic sites or within historic districts may be improved with a surface material other than pavement, where there are 12 or less parking spaces, subject to HPB Staff Report 27.5 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan &Landscape Plan . Page 3 approval by the Historic Preservation Board. Per LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(8)(b), parking spaces and lots must meet the drainage and grading plan requirements as dictated by the City Engineer. The applicant proposes the installation of a mulch parking lot, except for the handicapped space. A variance to allow the construction of a mulch parking lot was approved for the Sundy House by the Historic Preservation Board on January 15, 1992. Due to critical containment issues and drainage concerns with this site upon the construction of the mulch lot, the City has discouraged any further use of mulch as an acceptable permanent parking surface. An alternative parking surface (hard surface) is encouraged such as brick pavers or asphalt or an alternative material such as pea rock. In order for the applicant to meet the minimum standards for an alternative use such as pea rock, the lot must meet drainage and grading requirements and a base course must be provided to meet the same requirements as a hard surface material. This has been attached as a condition of approval. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Site Visibility Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.14(A)(1), when an accessway intersects a public right-of-way or when the subject property abuts the intersection of two (2) or more public rights-of-way, landscaping within the following area shall provide unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between three (3) feet and six (6) feet: any area on both sides of an accessway formed by the intersection of each side of the accessway and the public rights-of-way with two (2) sides of each triangle being twenty feet (20') in length from the point of intersection and the third side being a line connecting the ends of the other two (2) sides. The existing fence does not currently meet this requirement for sight visibility. The existing fence measures 72" (6') in height and runs along the northern perimeter of the property. In order to meet the sight visibility triangle, the fence must be reduced to a height of 36" (3') and must be set back a minimum of 5' from the property line and a minimum of 20' from the point of the intersection from the drive aisle. Landscaping must be planted in front of the fence as a buffer from the right-of-way. These modifications have been attached as conditions of approval. Stacking Distance Pursuant to LDR, Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), the minimum requirement for parking areas under 20 spaces is 5' which is provided. Bike Rack Pursuant to LDR 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided at any non- residential use within the City's TCEA (Transportation Concurrency Exception Area) which, through the development review process, is determined to generate a demand. The TCEA includes the Old School Square Historic District. In addition, Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan requires bicycle facilities on all new development and redevelopment with particular emphasis on development within the TCEA. Provision of • •HPB Staff Report 275 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan &Landscape Plan . Page 4 a bike rack is appropriate for this development and has been attached as a condition of approval. Site Lighting Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting is required on site for new development proposals. A photometric plan has not been submitted to meet this requirement as outlined in LDR Section 4.6.8. Further, site lighting locations must be provided on the site plan, landscape and engineering plans including fixture details which is a condition of approval. Underground Utilities Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.8, utility facilities serving the development shall be located underground throughout the development, however this has not been indicated on the plans. The site plan must be revised to show the relocation of the utilities underground and is attached as a condition of approval. Sidewalks Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-way adjacent to the property. An existing 5' sidewalk currently runs along both N. Swinton Avenue and NE 3rd Street providing accessibility to the building as well as the parking area. Refuse Container Area: All refuse containers must be screened by decorative wood fences and gates or landscaping. No fencing or landscaping has been proposed to screen the refuse enclosures. Accommodation must also be made for recyclable materials. A condition of approval mandates that the proposed refuse area be enclosed by fencing or landscaping and that the area be designed to accommodate recyclables. Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) Provide stop sign and bar at egress into alley. 2) Provide drainage calculations with exfiltration test results. 3) That a bike rack be placed on site and indicated on the site and landscape plans. 4) Indicate the use of a type "D" curb and show limits of the curb with cutouts for drainage. This should be noted on the Engineering as well as the Landscape Plans. 5) Indicate the correct height of the fence of six feet (6') on the Engineering Plans. 6) Indicate the width of the driveway. The drive aisle may be a maximum of six feet (6') wide. HPB Staff Report 275 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan &Landscape Plan . Page 5 7) Railroad ties cannot be used. 8) Provide a note that "The City will determine the size of the water meter" on the plans. 9) Indicate width of driveway. The drive aisle must be a maximum of 26' wide. 10) Utilize City standard details on Site Plan and Engineering Plan. 11) Revise drainage calculations to reflect an impervious surface on the parking lot. 12) Dimensions are required on the Grading, Paving, and Drainage plans. 13) Provide two copies of a pollution prevention plan. 14) Indicate the scale on each plan. The scale must be labeled and consistent with each set of plans. 15) That the handicapped space and access panels must be paved regardless of the materials chosen for the parking area. 16) Indicate the location of the refuse container and its method of screening on both the site plan and landscape plan. 17) Provide a fence detail and location of any proposed fencing on the site and landscape plans. 18) Site data should be noted on the site plan to read both existing and required setbacks and open space provided. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS Additional landscaping will be featured adjacent to the rear of the building and the new parking area. Existing foliage consists of Cocoplum and Silver Buttonwood hedges along the east and west perimeter with Silver Dollar Eucalyptus, Walters Viburnum, Satin Leaf, Keylime, Loblolly, Jequat, Seagrape, Sweetbay and Sapodilla Trees and Coconut, Sable, and Pigmy Date Palms interspersed throughout the property. Existing underplantings consist of Crotons and Foxtail Fern. Proposed plantings include Yew and a Mulberry Tree with underplantings consisting of a Roses, Yellow Thyrallis, Mexican Bluebells, Variegated Liriope, Viburnum, and Jatropha hastata. Additional Cocoplum and Ficus will complete the perimeter hedging on the southern perimeter. The existing and proposed landscaping complies with the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), a strip of land at least five feet (5') in depth located between the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area and the right-of-way shall be provided. The existing fence along the north property line shall be relocated to the interior edge of the 5' landscape strip and reduced to three feet (3') in height within the site •HPB Staff Report 275 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan . Page 6 visibility triangle. If the fence is relocated, a hedge must be placed along the north side of the fence. Further, it is noted that authorization from the utility company must be obtained to relocate the fence within the utility easement. Another alternative is to remove the fence altogether. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Other Mixed Use (OMU) and a zoning designation of Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(B)(2), and (3), within the OSSHAD zoning district, business and professional offices, and specialty shops are listed as permitted uses. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A), Future Land Use Map Consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan was conducted and no applicable goals, objectives or policies were found. •HPB Staff Report 275 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan &Landscape Plan . Page 7 Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bounded by the OSSHAD zoning district with a combination of commercial and residential uses. Compatibility is not a concern, as the proposed use of the subject property would be permitted on the surrounding properties. The proposal retains the existing residential character while accommodating the adaptive re-use of the historic dwelling. Based on the above, the development will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent properties. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency The project proposed for 275 N. Swinton Avenue was reviewed by the CRA during its meeting on August 8, 2002. The CRA Board recommended approval. Meeting notices have been sent to the Progressive Residents of Delray (PROD) and the President's Council. Letters of support or objection, if any, will be presented at the meeting. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves the conversion of a contributing residence to office and the integration of perimeter landscaping and parking. The proposal will be consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan with changes as identified in this staff report, in particular, elimination of the mulch parking lot and the provision of a parking surface that is acceptable to the City Engineer. These changes are outlined as conditions of approval. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA and the associated Class V site plan and landscape plan for 275 N. Swinton Avenue based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4), (E)(8) subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA and the associated Class V site plan and landscape plan for 275 N. Swinton Avenue, based upon failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1. (E)(4, (E)(8) with basis stated. •HPB Staff Report 275 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan . Page 8 STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Site Plan Approve the COA for the Class V site plan for the 275 N. Swinton Avenue, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), Section 2.4.5(F)(5) and Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That a photometric plan be submitted along with a detail for the decorative site lighting fixture(s) and that their locations be indicated on the site and landscape plans. 3) That the site plan must be revised to show the relocation of the utilities underground. 4) That the mulch parking surface be eliminated and an alternative surface material provided which includes a base course and meets drainage and grading standards acceptable to the City Engineering Department. 5) That the fence along the north property line adjacent to the parking area be relocated to the interior edge of the landscape strip and reduced to no more than 3' in height to comply with the 20' sight visibility requirement. Landscape Plan Approve the COA for the landscape plan for 275 N. Swinton Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16 subject to the following condition: 1) That a five foot (5') landscape strip be provided between the off-street parking area and the right-of-way. Attachments: • Survey • Site Plan • Landscape Plan • Elevations Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner • HPB Staff Report 27.5 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan Page 9 APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists via service lateral connections to the 10" water main along N. Swinton Avenue. ❑ Sewer service exists via service lateral connections to an 8" sewer main along N. Swinton Avenue. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided via existing fire hydrants on N. Swinton Avenue. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build- out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standards. Drainage: A preliminary drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on- site via an exfiltration system. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD, and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The proposed 1,763 sq. ft. retail will generate approximately 153 additional daily trips which will not have a significant impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Parks and Open Space: Park dedication requirements do not apply for nonresidential uses. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for a conversion of single family dwellings to a retail/office. Trash generation is based upon the worst case scenario of retail and restaurant. Trash generated each year by the proposed 1,763 sq.ft. retail space will be 8.99 tons of solid waste per year (1,763 x 10.2 =2,000 = 8.99). The trash generated by the existing single family home is 1.99 tons of solid waste per year resulting in an increase of 7 tons per year. The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of service standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. •HPB Staff Report 275 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan &Landscape Plan Page 10 APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent Will be met once site lighting and photometric are submitted— complying with LDR Section 4.6.8. B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent Will be met once a bike rack is provided C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent • .HPB Staff Report 275 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan • Page 11 F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent w Gam. w o I> G� >v W J a2� I �� Q �P. • w �� �P O r F� ` , • r cc <� ` �� N.E. 5TH TERR. WOOD LANE OJ 0 Z KINGS LYNN w Z z iii i� N m } W0�� N.E. 5TH CT. ¢ Z BEVERLY DR. W Gam. lc? Q \ Fk'a� TRINITY N.E. 5TH ST. ' LUTHERAN itZ4 i w Z LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. 4TH ST. POST - ' CASON OFFICE METHODIST j CHURCHLi Li - „, w >Li Li > ¢ > MI MINI • < < N.W. 3RD ST. • ••N:E. 3RD ST. I > a 11.1 0 CITY I♦ o o_ ATTORNEY ' N "' 11 I n BUILDING I - w N.W. 2ND ST. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. 2ND ST. F- . z — -1 N z I > I w c o w f CITY Q HALL z E. 3 3 i z z I N.E. 1ST S'. N.W. 1ST 1 ST.li L.L., - 1 Z ui Z irnn__Z1 N 0 275 N. SWINTON AVENUE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM651 .. n-UM III F15l EI'ni [—RECORDS or'AIM eh i•'•t'•'11;IAI. OMA.r 1!t„I;1760,��AtIE 1742 OF 711E C��t•'_• i CO117R Y,rLUIRDA. --- S ------ 8916, _ �.`� S I°i1'?2"li 7.tGYl' 11 I LOT I COrI roustrX 2' —a —7-+ —�_-(Tt,lt, �sE?tIZI�I•RY AP 1 reura,7-xr. _ R�K 4 dt STRATFOIZD ATTA BOWS IURNUM6En Eel /-�' 7 1r'IINR:.SS CORN1:R rCF:Cf • a•nesr T'— ' ' It FOu17o 24 Eo) /'Jj/ REPEA T i CO'UNNUM EREDMEN) -B'RECIPROCAL ACCE59 i61e OF711ERECORDS0I ALM pE/A ICOUIRY,IFLOREDA.RO BOOK 7653,PAGE I' • • �r According to l/rep/n[recorder/in P/nt Book 77,Page 200, recorded[rr the public ASPI e�T C+ records of Paint Beach county,Floririn;said land situate,lying, mrrl being in QRr / ti Palm Bench County,Florida. • �o • _(.. .. g �C�l-E: 1 11.=.2t .Q:ev.r c,Lair , NEc_ `5 St ry 1{ 4vw'w S.!? 1' sr 4 _��•U� BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO PLAT t - ~-? ° I ^ 1 �' AND ARE ASSUMED. > • heal - • -._ If/-t) Fb > G Office, w C^ ur 4,1 • NO ABSTRACT OR TITLE SEARCH WAS PERFORMED •• - I w'N E >ct-3N < F= W a f 1 ` l TO DISCOVER THE EXISTENCE OF ANY EASEMENTS �-L�S-? >NEJ 3U OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. rt w -Q t•, S T r` o; V Il _ I c 1 .- trj •� O" ��" y ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON ST NE M 2 • In Z Vii NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 KINSi 1v BLVD a ST L NORTH �2.5 ao ;PogcH r UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. •vP IpRI t w a o w - • w'NE 1 CL ' �3,v Ln <—O'.Z tununila.f�i liar iiST, NE 'Q G �•{ "'I Not to Scale G, I� NO BELOW GROUND I6fPROVEMENTS,FOOTERS, K1�{: - S T / m 'I'cimis Ctr t7 i 6` / ---I( FOUNDATIONS OR UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED • : z )I d n ® Lh�' _ OR SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. Fire :hn,rlw Z u Atl:uu - ¢ 1_ n^^,_�� huiicZ :" =w< f;laza;'c iarars„ VICIRIIy '— 115•3 1.- 1 b v_R N O.R.B.=official record book Map 6.4 / ��`7 _17.0_ Tran.=transformer pad P.B.=plat book P=plat PG.=page _ C.B.S.=concrete block structure F.P.&L=Florida Power&Light Typ=typical p g 13 A �E51 D EI ICE" .r. 3 P.C.C.=point of compound curve CM=concrete monument YP =Power polo I.R.=iron rod P.C.P.=permananent control point P.R.C.=point of reverse curve carn rat angle I.P.ht-of-way M==Iron pipe D=deed s X. X I r/ T w P.O.C.=point of commencement P.I.=point of Intersection 0=bearing basis line RP=radius point 0/S=offset ' P.O.B.=point of beginning P.T.=point of tangency Ash=asphalt I J 3C`•y I ci DIE=drainage easement *=not field measured P P L=arc length Conc=concrete Con,.• M.H.=manhole CL=centerline Esmt=easement 44 C.M.P.=corrugated metal pipe WPF=wood privacy fence U/E=utility easement ALUM.=aluminum Calc=calculated U p R.L.S.=registered land surveyor Chatt=chatlahoochee CLF=chain link fence P.C.=point of curvature • L.B.=licensed business ELEV=elevation P.R.M.=permanent reference monument c0 Renner, Burgess, Inc. so — -— �� Certified To: w Fj 1 S.E.4th Ave.,Suite 205 CLIFF JAGGER,A SINGLE MAN AND ') Delray Beach,FL 33483 IIAROLU L.BARLOW,JR.,A MARRIED MAN P4,..., -------� • ___. — Phone 661.243.4624 SOLI'1'II'I'ItUS'1'MORTGAGE CORP., C.,rt.•. 41n._u Fax 243-4869 rnnnu 4•x a• '-` LivitI West Palm Its Successors rmd/or Assigns As Their interest Mny Appcnr• cuNcnetr,luonuurnr• Suronylny735.7639 prurmunrnrul O N.I'31'11"11:Nr!lX)' I ` West Palm Fax 735.7641 '1'Ills I.A1\'OI'lICF.OF LES SCIINEIDERMAN,I'.A. p :f'oJNp1�i1144cAP _� Toll Free 1-800.773-5531 'C ,((>(i'R�11) _ ::UNNUngIiRE� —� Fax Free ATTORNEY'ST'ITLEINSURANCEFUND,INC. 1-800-954.4408 rn Authorization Number Lf36504 . . 11 I t Fiood ZortdC._____.X.___.. 75GIG' I I hereby edify alh the Sketch of Boundary Survey shown hereon..Map1Jo;- _ 1 meets th minlmu ochnicalstanda s et forth in Chapter 61G17-6, 1�2_ " �� J I Florida ministrat a ode puns a to Section 472.027, Florida- MapDate.-- r5_ei -- Statutes. l 275N.S{;IN,ONO Npl yard unless 1(JE 1 n Date:- "-"r-p;••ram- sealed with embossed Joti:NoL_.__.Zav!. 'Z2Z..._.: surveyors sea.i.. Harry .Burgess c -7.r55089 Revised: 62-1`I-rz' SE men>Ee HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Lvi CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- EETING DATE: October 2, 2002 AGENDA ITEM: ll. B. ITEM: 310 North Swinton Avenue— Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a Class V Site Plan for the conversion from residential to office. ETH_ STET.—• N.E. 6TH ST. _, GENERAL DATA: L\H OOD LANEOwner/A Wonderland Management, IPPlicant LLCAgent n/a T U `�Q Location West side of Swinton TRINITY N.E. 5TH ST. Avenue, approximately 100' LUTHERAN I I I I I north of Northwest 3rd Street. I I I I I I I I Z `LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. 4TH sr.Property Size 0.153 Acres _ Future Land Use Map OMU (Other Mixed Use) CASON POST — OFFICE — Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School METHODIST CHURCH Square Historic Arts District) _ _djacent Zoning North: OSSHAD (Old School L., _ Square Historic Arts District) East: OSSHAD (Old School Square - _ — _ Historic Arts District) —— South: OSSHAD (Old School Square N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD Sr Historic Arts District) I West: OSSHAD (Old School Square - Historic Arts District) Existing Land Use Single Family Residence ATTORNEY N Proposed Land Use Conversion from residential BUILDING I to office. I I I I _ MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. 2ND ST. Water Service Existing on site. —. N z0 _}_ Sewer Service Existing on site. Z N W Z CITY HALL Z -. N.E. 1ST S'-- i > ' COMMUNITY CENTER TENNIS OLD STADIUM SCHOOL [ SQUARE NI ATLANTIC AVE. III ii1 I I I I I I I H l l I i 'I IL.B. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 310 N. Swinton Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class V Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; and, ❑ Waiver requests The subject property is located on the west side of N. Swinton Avenue between NE 3rd Street and NE 4tn Street/Lake Ida Road. BACKGROUND The subject property consists of the south 50' of the north 250' of the east 135' of the south half of Block 57, Town of Delray. The wood frame building was constructed in 1924 and displays a metal roof and single hung sash windows. During its meeting on January 17, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a COA request that included the following: the replacement of the asphalt shingle roof with 5-V crimp, mill finish metal roof, the installation of two curb mounted sky lights, the replacement of the awning and jalousie windows with Colonial style single hung sash widows, the replacement of the door on the south side with a French door, the replacement of the main entry door with a French door, removal of the entry door on the northwest corner and the re-framing of the side door, removal of the west elevation window and replacement with a door, the installation of hurricane shutters, installation of Chicago brick paver walkway, change of paint colors, wood rot repairs, and additional landscaping. The COA request was approved with the exception of the skylights. A Chattahoochee parking area has been installed and the building is currently occupied as office space by Bagliori Development. On July 17, 2002, the Code Enforcement Division issued a violation notice for the conversion from residential to office without first obtaining site plan approval. A Class V Site Plan has been submitted to convert the building from residential to office and is now before the Board for consideration. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal includes the following: ❑ Conversion of a 1,316 sq. ft. single family, contributing dwelling from residential to office; ❑ Construction of a 6 space paver block parking lot including two compact spaces and one handicapped accessible space; HPB Staff Report 310 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan Page 2 ❑ Installation of brick walkways and perimeter landscaping; o The proposal involves a waiver, per LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), to allow parking in front of the historic building and a waiver to reduce the landscape strips on the north and south sides of the parking area from five feet (5') to four feet (4') along the north property line and three and a half feet (3.5') on the south property line, per LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d). SITE PLAN ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The applicable development standards that relates to the proposal is as follows: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 15' Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 25' 77'-6" Side (Interior) 7'6" 1'-11 1/2" (north) 18'-2" (south) Rear 10' 5'-2 1/2" Open Space 25% 33% LDR Section 4.4.24 (OSSHAD-Special District Regulation): Parking Pursuant to LDR 4.4.24(G)(4)(a), all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. Based on the above, the 1,316 sq. ft. building requires five (5) parking spaces and six (6) are proposed to adequately accommodate employee and customer needs. Parking Location Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), all parking, except for single family homes and duplexes, shall be located in the side or rear yard or adjacent to a rear alley. No such parking shall be located in the area between any street and the closest building or structure. Where there are existing buildings or structures, the Historic Preservation Board may waive this requirement during the site plan review process, provided that it is determined that compliance is not feasible and that the character of the area will be HPB Staff Report 310 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan Page 3 maintained. If approved, such parking shall be substantially screened from off-premises view by hedge or decorative fencing. The proposed parking area is located within the front yard (in front of) the extant historic dwelling. The parking area will consist of Chicago brick pavers throughout the parking area. The only deviation from this plan will be at the handicapped parking space and adjacent access panel which will be constructed of concrete. Parking in the front of the extant building is the only viable option to meet the parking requirements on this lot. The building was constructed at the west end of the property and is set back only 5'-2 1/2" from the west property line. Also, there is inadequate space to provide any parking in the side yards. The Chicago brick parking lot will compliment the historic building and is appropriate for this setting. Adequate landscaping will be provided to help screen the parking area. Based on this analysis, it is appropriate to allow parking in the front yard as there are no viable alternatives as to the building's re-location. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Stacking Distance Pursuant to LDR, Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), the minimum requirement for less than 20 spaces is five feet (5') which is provided. Bike Rack Pursuant to LDR 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided at any non- residential use within the City's TCEA (Transportation Concurrency Exception Area) which, through the development review process, is determined to generate a demand. In addition, Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan requires bicycle facilities on all new development and redevelopment with particular emphasis on development within the TCEA. Provision of a bike rack is appropriate for this development and is noted on the site and landscape plans. Site Lighting Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting is required on site for new development proposals. Site lighting locations are provided on the site plan, landscape and engineering plans and a photometric plan has been submitted to meet this requirement. Light fixture details have been provided reflecting a decorative fixture as seen throughout the Old School Square Historic District. Alley Improvement Obligations: Pursuant to Section 6.1.2(A)(2), when an unimproved local street or alley is located on a boundary of the project, the project is responsible for providing one-half of the improvements along its property line, unless the project requires greater participation, i.e. when a street is required to carry the traffic from the project and when additional travel lanes are needed to accommodate the traffic. If it is impractical to physically provide the HPB Staff Report 310 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan Page 4 improvements, this obligation may be met by payment of cash funds equal to the current cost for installation of such improvements. An unimproved alley borders the property for the length of the western property line. Although it is not going to be utilized for access to the site the applicant will be required to contribute one-half of the cost of improving the alley (for the length of said property). This contribution must be provided prior to issuance of a building permit, or a waiver must be obtained from the City Commission. This requirement has been added as a condition of approval. Underground Utilities Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.8, utility facilities serving the development shall be located underground throughout the development, however this has not been indicated on the plans. The site plan must be revised to show the relocation of the utilities underground, and is attached as a site plan technical item. Sidewalks Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-way adjacent to the property. An existing 5' sidewalk is located in front of the property along North Swinton Avenue. A brick paver walkway will be installed on the property leading from the proposed parking area to the front and side entrances of the building. Refuse Container Area All refuse containers must have decorative wood fences and gates. No landscaping or fencing has been proposed to screen the refuse enclosures. This has been attached as a technical item. Site Plan Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) The minimum required drive aisle width is 24' and approximately 23'-6" is proposed. Provide 24' as required. 2) Provide two copies of a pollution prevention plan. 3) Remove handicap parking detail from the Site Plan. 4) Provide the location of water service RPZ backflow preventer. 5) Provide details for ADA access to the building. 6) Provide typical cross sections at all property lines. 7) Proposed utilities shall be located underground. HPB Staff Report 310 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan Page 5 LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS The proposed landscape plan consists of both existing and proposed plantings. The proposed plan includes: Pigeon Plum with Cocoplum, Mexican Bromeliads, Hibiscus, Indian Hawthorn, Blue Plumbago, Liriope, and assorted annuals as underplantings. Existing landscaping includes: Vietchia Palms, Pink Tabebuia, Ruella, Coconut Palms, Frangi-Pani Tree, Mahogany, Agapanthus, Shell Ginger, Dwarf Date Palm, Areca Palms, Bougainvillea, Sabel Palm, Bird of Paradise, Sago Palm, Alocacia, and Dracaena with Lantana Groundcover. Clusea and Hibiscus are located on the adjacent property along the south property line. Cocoplum, Variegated Schefflera, and Ficus hedge runs along the north and south perimeter of the property. The landscaping complies with the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16, except as discussed under the waiver analysis below. The applicant proposes to retain the existing landscaping which encroaches into the alley. In order to retain the existing material, the applicant must execute a Landscape Maintenance Agreement with the City in order to ensure that the existing landscaping is tended to by the owner and that the City is not responsibile for its upkeep. This has been attached as a condition of approval. Waiver Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscape barrier shall be provided between the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area and the abutting properties. This landscape barrier shall be located between the common lot line and the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area in a planting strip of not less than five feet (5') in width. Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. The applicant is requesting a waiver to reduce the required landscape strips on the north and south sides of the parking area from the required five feet (5') to four feet (4') along the north property line and three and a half feet (3.5') along the south property line. In order to provide a standard single-loaded parking area (42') with the required 5' perimeter landscaping, 52.5' is necessary and the property is 50' wide. The required amount of landscaping can be installed within the four feet (4') strips. A waiver to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) to reduce the required landscape strips can be supported due to the minimal lot width of 50' providing nominal space for both the required parking and landscaping, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), as described above. • HPB Staff Report 310 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan &Landscape Plan Page 6 Landscape Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) Indicate the method of screening for the refuse container on the site and landscape plans. 2) A landscape strip of at least five feet (5') shall be provided between the proposed vehicular use area and the right-of-way; only 4'-11" has been provided. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Other Mixed Use (OMU) and a zoning designation of Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(B)(2), and (3), within the OSSHAD zoning district, business and professional offices are listed as permitted uses. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A), Future Land Use Map Consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions) As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. • HPB Staff Report 310 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan Page 7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan was conducted and no applicable goals, objectives or policies were found. Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings) Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is surrounded by the OSSHAD zoning district. The property is surrounded by residential uses with the exception of the vacant property to the west. Compatibility is not a concern, as the proposed use of the subject property would be allowable on each of the surrounding properties. The proposal retains the existing residential character while accommodating the adaptive re-use of the historic building. The project will enhance property values within the area. Based on the above, the development will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent properties. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency The proposed Class V Site Plan at 310 North Swinton Avenue was reviewed by the CRA during its meeting on September 12, 2002. No comments or concerns were expressed. Meeting notices have been sent to the Progressive Residents of Delray (PROD) and the President's Council. Letters of support or objection, if any, will be presented at the meeting. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves a site plan for the legal conversion of a contributing dwelling from residential to office use including perimeter landscaping and parking. The proposal will be consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan with substantial changes as identified in this staff report. These changes are outlined as conditions of approval. The proposal involves a waiver to allow parking within the front yard in front of the contributing building. Due to the building's location and the existing front yard setback of 77'-6", this waiver can be supported. A waiver has also been requested to reduce the landscape strips from the required five feet (5') to four feet (4') on the north property line and three and a half feet (3.5") on the south property line. As the width of the lot is minimal, measuring just 50' (52'-6" required to accommodate 5' landscape strips), and due to the location of the existing building, this waiver can also be supported. • HPB Staff Report 310 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan Page 8 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the COA and associated Class V site plan and landscape plan for 310 N. Swinton Avenue based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4) and (E)(8) subject to conditions. C. Deny the COA and the associated Class V site plan and landscape plan for 310 N. Swinton Avenue, based upon failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1. (E)(4) and (E)(8). STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Waivers Approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3) to allow six parking spaces to be located within the front yard between the building and the street. Based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), approve the waiver to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), to reduce the required landscape strip on the north and south sides of the parking area from five feet (5') to four feet (4') along the north property line and three and a half feet (3.5') along the south property line. Site Plan Approve the COA for the Class V site plan for the 310 N. Swinton Avenue, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) and Section 2.4.6 (COA Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report; and, 2) That the one-half the cost to improve the alley adjacent to the property is provided prior to issuance of a building permit, or that a waiver is obtained from the City Commission. • HPB Staff Report 310 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan &Landscape Plan Page 9 Landscape Plan Approve the COA for the landscape plan for the 310 N. Swinton Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report; and, 2) A Landscape Maintenance Agreement must be executed between the City and the owner to allow landscaping to encroach into the alley. Attachments: • Survey • Site Plan • Landscape Plan Report prepared by: Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner • HPB Staff Report 310 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan Page 10 APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 3.1.1(B), Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists via a service lateral connection to the 10" water main along North Swinton Avenue. ❑ Sewer service exists via a service lateral connection to an 8" sewer main along North Swinton Avenue. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided via an existing fire hydrant at on the corner of NE 3rd Street and North Swinton Avenue. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build- out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to these level of service standards. Drainage: A preliminary drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on- site via an exfiltration system. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD, and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Therefore, a traffic study is not required for concurrency purposes; however a traffic statement is necessary to keep a record of trips approved in the TCEA and for calculation of traffic impact fees. The applicant has submitted a statement based upon the conversion from residential to office which states that the 1,316 sq. ft. office will generate 31 average daily trips with a net increase of approximately 20 daily new trips. Parks and Open Space: Park dedication requirements do not apply for nonresidential uses. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for a conversion of a single family dwelling to office. Trash generation is based upon the worst case scenario of office use. Trash generated by the proposed 1,316 sq.ft. building is [1,316 sq.ft. x 5.4 lbs/sq.ft. = 27,106.4Ibs/2,000 = 3.55 tons] 3.55 tons of solid waste per year. The trash generated by a single family home is 1.99 tons of solid waste per year resulting in an increase of roughly 1.56 tons per year. The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of service standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. • • HPB Staff Report 310 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan &Landscape Plan Page 11 APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent • HPB Staff Report 310 N. Swinton Avenue-Class V Site Plan & Landscape Plan Page 12 F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location,without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent z PO > �. w G w < QO •■ ¢�� �G ` a P 1, ,,, F� N ` ♦�O • ` ,�JP N.E. 5TH TERR. Z WOOD LANE ` OJ z� 0 KINGS LYNN ? Z Z1111 il N o\��v N.E. 5TH CT. LLI O > a° TRINITY ¢ N.E. 5TH ST. LUTHERAN w I w z z LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. 4TH _ST. POST — ' nCASON OFFICE — ' _ METHODIST _ CHURCH — >— > > = > _ a ¢ ¢ s ..... ..MOM ii N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. n 0 Li Li a > 0 0 CITY o 0 ATTORNEY N "' 2 0 BUILDING M w Vr N.W. 2ND ST. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. 2ND ST. Z F o r O r >N I-- ¢. Z_ > N 0 I Li0 Z w Z Z _ItL 2 CITY a HALL w LT_ Z Z N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST Sr. / zz t irnn z N • --immi-- 310 N. SWINTON AVENUE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM647 I DELRAY BEACH DEFRAY BEACH j Ames" HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ��n MEMORADUM STAFF REPORT imp 1993 1993 2001 2001 Agent: Ben & Susan Ruby, Owners Project Name: Ruby Residence Gazebo Project Location: 714 NE 2nd Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is to approve a COA for the installation of a gazebo in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property (714 NE 2nd Avenue) lies at the southwest corner of George Bush Boulevard (NE 8th Street) and NE 2nd Avenue. The property consists of Lots 14 and 15, Block 1, Del-Ida Park, which is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential), and contains two wood-frame buildings. The main dwelling and cottage were constructed in 1925 in the Mediterranean-Revival style. Both dwellings are contributing buildings within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS Project Description The proposed project includes the installation of a pre-fabricated wood frame, cedar gazebo. The gazebo is hexagonal in shape and consists of a cedar shingle roof topped with a vented cupola and wood post supports with built-in seating surrounding the interior of the structure. The structure measures 8' wide x 8' deep and is 11'4" in height including the cupola. The gazebo displays an undulating fascia with decorative, notched knee braces with a balustrade encompassing the bottom half of the structure. The gazebo will be painted white and will be located at the southwest corner of the property behind both dwellings and out of view from the right-of-way. Analysis Development Standards LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or Agenda Item: II.C. October 2, 2002 714 NE 2nd Avenue Gazebo Page 2 addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. Based on LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(8)(a-k), the gazebo must meet requirements in relation to height, proportion, relationship to materials, colors, textures, roof shapes, scale massing, and orientation. Currently, the structure does display a continuity of design in relation to texture, color, roof shapes, orientation, proportion, scale, and massing. While the wood frame design does not relate to the Mediterranean-Revival style of the extant dwellings, the structure will not negatively impact the contributing status of the buildings and is a reversible addition to the site. Further, the gazebo will not viewed from the right-of-way as fencing and dense landscaping surround the property. As there is no direct impact on the site and given the fact that the site has adequate space available to accommodate the new structure and given that the structure's scale and massing are in direct proportion to the extant buildings, positive findings can be made regarding the installation of the gazebo with respect to LDR Sections (E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-k). ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve 2002-385-COA-HPB for a gazebo at 714 NE 2"d Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 3. Deny 2002-385-COA-HPB for a gazebo at 714 NE 2"d Avenue, based on a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation with the basis stated. RECOMMENDATION Approve the COA for a gazebo at 714 NE 2nd Avenue based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Report prepared by Wendy Shay, Historic Preservation Planner SEP.13.a a 8:51AM CITY OF DELRAY BEACH I NO.549 �.2i9 3 II'. ..t CERTIFICATE OF Ile b APPROPRIA'T N SS APPLICATION ;'1 ri it 8 , •,ua3 2 fl F-TT 'i4i1'c)Tr' t!ia'n‘cer�, - -_-- -- — ll i� Y w A igL. [ .....r.--•-_ ..1.... -.. • • , . ,,.•s ....ktt%yy�� i • : - -.4.1— • r ( - -• �-t f (I', „. d :mar•,+s4Ya':Z __A-� 'tea','"' i: 1. .i. 1`+ k ram' tt i Arrs' � , 1,, i'�;' :i� a6" f s' - :;.. •sC t y, -' F 1 et- 1 l O:II 1:M i a! ` i` i d: I,' di '! -- - e l� - ::sY�,t$aaKnLL�-sMµN i, 'asp .~ ��� 5 Z a Cedar w/mar it an .i time PrM ie Hi tori: Port 1edr le irioHi'' Tha be : ._ Btion must 17�t1 - - °"`:r �:--- - • . " , ie City of a�g. ,,yy -- -a ti;a� the Iti5 �' � ~: �'_ - I'' reor: • ` • ig^aim .: _ DE-1i s-� i 6 -. _ 1i mil^ .�' '- i '.•; it-iVs .-Aiii ' _- ,.r? 11n 1aTE !!: str - 1_ -- : �iiiiiiitiiiiii! y"1 • : it 32 ofac iID lt . ( i[i :T IE 6i T `(Ii .. .. NDLe: _._ be. ai' w:* - �,c - fit: i c' must �n m� it 14 dis_E �OR1�N1�t C IR DOU8t RO aoun ed CUPOLA,PAIN D,' �IVCf1�S; atgNl�tSPINDLES 1. 3., r _a_.a. ...� ��.>, ..a NO 53561 �% A. NUKE AY 9-4 ar SUKE AY / LEGEND 1ST v UNFIT Ns • IN 1 •F A • ARC LENGTH p 'rE �•',i Si " MO_ NY •) C.O.S. . CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE 1 St 'IE I e NE�O N IN CII . CHORD DISTANCE I N. N. 8 t h STREET CHAT. • CHATTAHOOCHEE F NE..�,11 Si N 1 CL • CENTERLINE ^SDI $ s 3 Si _� •— _ _ __ _ _ ___ ____ CONC. • CONCRETE s_ NE•; c� 6 -ST 7 CI D 1 7� — — — — — — ELEV. • ELEVATION 1 t � • • — E.0.A. • EDGE OF ASPHALT ret p NE `. NE 7 St I ID. = FOUND F.O.A. I I.P. • IRON PIPE �- ° �Ti NE E st l d Nei o — I — — — — I.FT. • IRON ROD INA 2' ? 04 /1) C' •. • N/D NAIL WITH DISC ,yESSi u° Ntfl • N/I • NAIL WITH TAB CONE. / • ED. 1/2' • N.T.S. •• NOT 10 SCALE V IC IN I TY MAP (N. 7. S. ) BEARING OASIS AS / . OAKASPDALI NALK / / / / / / / IR/CAP P.C.P. • PERMANENT CONTROL POINT PER RECORDED PLAT 1 - . . • 126.90'IFIELD) P.D.B. • POINT OF BEGINNING ,' I P.D.C. • POINT OF COMMENCEMENT I HEREDY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SURVEYED THE PROPERTY HEREON / l01.84'(PLAT) 1 R • RADIUS DESCRIBED AND THAT THIS SKETCH OF SURVEY IS ACCURATE AND FD. 5/8' IR. 90'?5'fa' x—,Y-x M1 // / RN • RIGHT-OF-NAY CORRECT 10 THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. I FURTHER 1 N uL TAP. • TYPICAL CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM FIELD FENCE w -• a A=90°26'36' A • DELTA / TECHNICAL SIANOARDS AS SET FORTH IN CIIhPTER 61G17-6 OF IISG i5.7 1 R=25.00' • � 0/S OFFSET FLOFlIDA ADMINISTATIVE CODE AND THAT THERE ARE NO ABOVE �� I [e -r A=39.46' 'N°"' I GROUND ENCROACHMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN. ' . • ie.2' ', `u.7' b' A.1' - 4.3. /MC MID _ ' ' I , n+ --1�^- -/-- — 12.n I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: r i. •4' oNT. STORY o . ' •CONC. WALK LINE 50017 TRAMC tit-F77717/ • I LOTS 14 AND 15, BLOCK 1, DEL•IDA PARK, ACCORDING 10 IHL. PIA1 • 25 5 ONE STORY ' _n0°FEo\•I • THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 52. f1F 111E PUBLIC I100!) TRAMP. ); [Him I 7in. '� 61,E e RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. ,— ff1' l� « " core ✓ y, (714 N.E. 2RF1 AVENUE, DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA) - , / NAtK • MICK c. G'i 4. 141 f�07 1 G o / Agin!' 1= u. :I t CERTIFY T0: 1°F 15 BENJAMIN A. RUBY AND SUSAN A. RUDY. 1Or to �\ o' `� GMD SERVICES INC. ' — �' tZ STEWART TITLE GUARANTY. • A __ 1 ?-\.- n °j 1 T C�) CRLMEAT: SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, AS THEIR rn • i 1'. . .•� INTERESTS MAY APPEAR. of -- -- • �Q • (1J J. • . 1 /1,01 � I . CONC. • • I .. • ( ) „ DRIVE . .N°°D N^00 nnicK r• f 1" NCe Z ripe AND EDWARD A. PAC, JR. •! o'CNC I c•• ' • '—------. .---- ----- —----- ,_5/.7% I I P.L.S. A 4734 • BD'17'15 .-I PAC SURVEY INC FIELD / (561) 36B-9037 FAX (561) 36B-2860 c,:ic FD. 5/0' 1x—r —Y—g—Y—.—w—Y—Y—r—v.—,-,c—r.—x x—A>t—r—x—x8 I PO BOX 276205 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA, 33427 IR/cAP ---1_,— 126.05'(FIELD 127.00'(PLAT) o.a 25.00' ---- LB.353 O.2 CHAIN LINK FENCE SCALE: Uf1Ah4!BY 1^ = 20' BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR: L.AA,,. DATE SURYEYED:5-18-98 1M13.Y APPROVED os: -- LOT 1.4 NOTE: THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON IS AS FURNISHED — 6 HAS NOT BEEN ABSTRACTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED FOR EASEMENTS, REVISIONS THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREON IS IN A ZONE•z' RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR RESERVATIONS OF RECORD. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FLOOD PLAIN AS PER THE NATIONAL ROOD 6 FOUNDATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED SUCH INFORMATION SHOULD ID.26 P.10 INSURANCE PROGRAM. FLOOD RATE MAP • 1251020002D11-5-001 11E OBTAINED 6 VERIFIED BY OTHERS THJOUGH APPROPRIATE TITLE THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT IS DRAWING NUMBER VERIFICATION. SIGNED 6 EMBOSSED WITH A SURVEYORS SEAL. 9f3 2)39