The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB-10-04-00 OCTOBER <l 0 ` REVISED ,� P AGENDA 4y vr HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: October 4, 2000 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • September 20, 2000 III. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM A. Variance-70 & COA-417 Marina Bay Townhomes: A Development Proposal Which Will Replace the Existing Structures Located at 135 SE 7th Avenue and 124, 132 & 136 Marine Way (Harbor House Apartments), Marina Historic District. Gary Eliopoulos, Architect and Authorized Agent. Consider Granting Variances from the Land Development Regulations Section 4.3.4(K) Pertaining to the Side and Front Building Setback Requirements Associated with COA-417. COA-417, Consider the Following Elements: Demolition of All Structures Located on the Site; Including One Contributing Structure, Site Plan; Landscape Plan; and, Design Elements. HPB Meeting October 4, 2000 Page 2 IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA-416 Neal's Market Townhomes: Northeast Corner of NE 1st Street and NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Jeffery Silberstein, Architect and Authorized Agent. Consider the Following: Demolition of One Contributing Structure and One Noncontributing Structure Located on the Site; Site Plan; Landscape Plan; and, Design Elements. B. COA-260-Continuation: The Colony Hotel, 525 E. Atlantic Avenue, Individually Listed in the Local Register of Historic Places. Paul Gagnon or Mike Savage, Authorized Agents. Consider Window Replacements on the East Facade and a New Door on the Front Façade at the Southeast Corner of the Building. V. DISCUSSION ITEM A. Marine Way Street Improvements Presented by Joe Dragon, Assistant Director, Parks & Recreation B. Consider a Recommendation of Approval to the Planning & Zoning Board for an Amendment to the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan. VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff VII. ADJOURN Pat Cayce Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: September 28, 2000. Re-posted on October 3, 2000. Amended items are underlined. File/s/pz/hpb/HPB-10-4-00 FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT AST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: Bodker, Dave MAILING ADDRESS [X]CITY [] COUNTY []OTHER LOCAL AGENCY []STATE 801 NW 2nd Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33444 CITY COUNTY Delray Beach Palm Beach DATE ON WHISH VOTE OCCURRED NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY October 4, 2000 NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, City of Delray Beach OR COMMITTEE Historic Preservation Board WHO MUST FILE FORM 4 This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers,this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is prescribed for all other boards, i.e.those at the state level. 'ART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed. PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.1343(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes)by whom he is retained. In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: (a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is abstaining from voting;and (b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below. NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting. In such cases, however,the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made. I,the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on October 4,2000: (a) I abstained from voting on a matter which(check one): inured to my special private gain;or X inured to the special gain of North Atlantic Realty Corp., by whom I am retained. (b) The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Agenda Item III.A.: Variance 70 & COA 417, New Constructio M 'na Bay Townhomes. I am the Landscape Architect for this project. /( 2'J 4� Date fled Signature --` Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART B VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom is retained is required to disclose the nature of is interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs. I,the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclosure that on , 19 (a) I voted on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain;or inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retainer (b) The measure on which I voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Date Filed Signature Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15)days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. this form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 11.317(1983), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTEF GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE ORE MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OF SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED$5,000. MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2000 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Keller, Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott, Shane Ames (arrived 6:10), Dave Bodker, Donnamarie Sloan, Rhonda Sexton (arrived 6:10) STAFF PRESENT: Michelle Hoyland, Jeff Costello, Ron Hoggard, Diana Mund, Assistant City Attorney Jay Jambeck II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of September 20, 2000 were before the Board for consideration. Ms. Jamison moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0. At this point on the agenda Mr. Bodker stepped down form the Board. III. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: A. Variance 70 & COA 417: Marina Bay Townhomes, a Development Proposal, which will Replace the Existing Structures Located at 135 SE 7th Avenue & 124, 132 & 136 Marine Way (Harbor House Apartments), Marina Historic District. Gary Eliopoulos, Architect/Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering granting variances from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) pertaining to the side and front building setback requirements. The COA consists of demolition of all structures located on the site including one contributing structure, site plan, landscape plan and design elements associated with a new townhouse development. After discussion by the Board with Mr. Jambeck and Mr. Eliopoulos about the lack of adequate time for the Board to review the staff report, Mr. Eliopoulos agreed to table the item until the Board's October 18, 2000 meeting. At this point on the agenda Ms. Sexton & Mr. Ames arrived at the meeting. At this point on the agenda Mr. Bodker returned to the Board. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 416: Neal's Market Townhomes, Northeast Corner of NE 1st Street and NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Jeffery Silberstein, Architect/Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering demolition of one contributing structure and one noncontributing structure, site plan, landscape plan and design elements associated with a new townhouse development. The following people from the public commented on the proposal: Carolyn Patton, representing Progressive Residents of Delray, stated their opposition to the demolitions as Neal's Market and Jo's Backroom are Delray Beach landmarks. Alieda Riley, 65 Palm Square, stated that she was opposed to the demolition of Jo's Backroom. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Bodker and passed 5-2 (Ms. McDermott & Mr. Keller dissenting) to approve COA 416 for the Demolition of the contributing and non-contributing structures located on the subject property, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1). It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to approve COA 416 for the Waiver to LDR Section 4.6.14(A)(2), to reduce the site visibility corner at the intersection of NE 1st Avenue and NE 1st Street, and the intersection of NE 1st Street and the alley, from 40' to 26' — 27'6", based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), with the following condition: • That the Live Oaks be replaced with palm trees that are more substantial than Alexander Palms. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 7-0 to approve COA 416 for the Site Plan, based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), LDR Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the lighting be revisited by the Board; 2. That the two Heritage Live Oak trees be replaced with groupings of Alexander Palm trees; -2- HPB Minutes 10/04/00 3. That 5' of right-of-way be dedicated with the plat; and, 4. That the plat be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. It was moved by Mr. Bodker, seconded by Mr. Ames and passed 7-0 to approve COA 416 for the Landscape Plan, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, with the following changes: 1. That the white Bird of Paradise be replaced with small Alexander palms; 2. That on the west elevation 20' high triple Alexander Palms be added; 3. That on the south elevation the Alexander Palms be replaced with more substantial palms such as Carpentaria and that they be 20' in height at the time of planting; 4. That on the north elevation two additional palms be added such as Carpentaria and that they be 20' in height at the time of planting; and, 5. That at the SE and SW corners the Heritage Live Oaks be replaced with 20' high triple palms such as Carpentaria Palms. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to approve COA 416 for the Design Elements, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.18, with the condition that the paint colors be revisited by the Board. B. COA 260-Continuation: The Colony Hotel, 525 E. Atlantic Avenue, Individually Listing in the Local Register of Historic Places. Paul Gagnon & Mike Savage, Authorized Agents. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering window replacements on the east façade and a new door on the front façade at the southeast corner of the building. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to approve COA 260-Continuation based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) and the Design Guidelines as follows: 1. The installation of the fixed pane windows with double transoms above as presented for the east façade of the building; and, 2. That new French doors to be installed on the south façade with double transom windows to match the windows on the east façade to be installed above the French doors. V. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. Marine Way Street Improvements, Presented by Joe Dragon, Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation. David Miller, Architect, gave a brief overview of the proposed plans for the Marine Way street improvements and the City Marina improvements. -3- HPB Minutes 10/04/00 B. Consider a Recommendation of Approval to the Planning & Zoning Board for an Amendment to the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan. Presented by Senior Planner Ron Hoggard. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 7-0 to recommend to the Planning & Zoning Board that the amended West Atlantic Redevelopment Plan be approved with the following changes: 1. That the redevelopment block diagram for the North 000 Block of W. Atlantic Avenue (between N. Swinton & NW 1st Avenues) be amended to maintain Doc's restaurant as it currently exists; and, 2. That historic structures that are to be removed or replaced be shown in dashed lines on the block diagrams. VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None B. Board Members None C. Staff None VII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:30 P.M. The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for October 4, 2000, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on November 15, 2000. Diana Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -4- HPB Minutes 10/04/00 ir-7---c-' _• • HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 4ITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: October 4, 2000 . AGENDA ITEMS: IV.A. ITEM: Consideration of COA-416 which incorporates the Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Design Elements for Neal's Market, Located on the Northeast Corner of N.E. 1st Street and N.E. 1st Avenue POST OFFICE CASON • METHODIST CHURCH G. • GENERAL DATA: - N.W. 3RD ST; N.E. _ 3RD _ ST. Lil Owner Mint Tea Development D - Applicant/Agent Gabay & Silberstein z I I' Architects, Inc. > ti .� c, Location Northeast corner of N.E. 1st a 1 i Street & N.E. 1st Avenue _ I N.W. 2ND ST. N.E. 'ND ST. firoperty Size 0.474 Acre —uture Land Use Map Other Mixed Use 3 Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) ., Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD a ■ East: CBD (Central Business _. r , 1 N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. District) 3 Z ElifiN South: OSSHAD z 0 West: OSSHAD Z Existing Land Use Vacant Commercial Buildings with parking (Neal's Market Sly OLD . and Jo's Backroom) li SQUARE IS Proposed Land Use Demolition of existing building ATLANTIC • AVENUE and construction of a 10-unit 1 I 111 I I It 1;11 townhouse development with <= _ . associated parking and — — a_ landscaping. _ _— Water Service existing on site. _- (i- Sewer Service existing on site. — S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. � IIII M I I ^ N • Et il IV.A. ♦ • The action before the Board is that of approval of COA-416 which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Neal's Market Townhomes, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class V Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; ❑ Building Elevations; and, ❑ Demolition of contributing and noncontributing commercial structures. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of NE 1st Avenue and NE 1st Street and is bounded on the east by an improved north/south alley. BApCKGROUND The 0.47 acre site consists of Lots 7 and 8, Block 75, Town of Delray, and is within the Old School Square Historic District and Pineapple Grove Redevelopment Area. The subject property is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) and contains two structures, which are discussed below. The Market Building, 105 NE 1st Street The Neal's Market building originally consisted of two separate structures separated by a wall. The eastern portion of the building (1,500 sq.ft.) was constructed in 1954. It is typical of the c.b.s. commercial vernacular buildings of the mid 50s with a flat roof and glass front doors across the south fagade and metal louvers above the doors. In 1960, the west portion of the building (1,200 sq.ft.) was constructed along the west side of the original structure. The wall was removed between the two buildings to create one space when Victor Neal purchased the property. The building is noncontributing from historical perspective. Jo's Back Room, 115 NE 1st Street The building was constructed as a 1,062 sq.ft. single-family residence in 1925. It is a contributing vernacular style structure of frame construction with a wrap around porch. Originally screened, the 312 sq.ft porch has been enclosed (total of 1,374 sq.ft.). A site plan approval request has been submitted to demolish the existing improvements and construct a 3-story, 10-unit townhouse development, which is now before the Board. PROJECT D'ESC IPTION The development proposal consists of the following: 0 Demolition of the noncontributing Neal's market building. • SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations—Neal's Market Townhomes Page 2 ❑ Demolition or relocation of the contributing cottage to the east (Jo's Backroom). ❑ Construction of 2 5-unit townhouse buildings, 1 to the north side of the property and 1 to the south, each building will be 3 stories tall. ❑ Construction of a 22 space parking court, which will be accommodated between the two structures with access from NW 1st Avenue and the north/south alley. ❑ Installation of landscaping, walkways, site lighting, bike rack and a refuse container area. SITE PEA=N ANAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. PURSUANT TO LDR SECTION 4.4.24(F)(I)(C), DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY (LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 75) IS SUBJECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE CBD ZONE DISTRICT[SECTIONS 4.4.13(F) AND (G)J. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) and Section 4.4.13(F)& (G)(2) as it pertains to the CBD zone district: Required Provided Building Height(max.) 48' 32'-37' Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 5' 12' Side (Interior) 0' 14' Side (Street) 5' 13' Rear 0' 10' Open Space 10% 19% LDR Section 4.4.13 CBD Supplemental District Regulations: Parking: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13 (G)(1)(e), multiple family units (2 bedrooms or more) are to provide 1.75 spaces a unit plus guest parking at a rate of 0.5 spaces for the first 20 units. Based on the above, 22 parking spaces are required. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations—Neal's Market Townhomes Page 3 Further, LDR Section 4.4.13(G)(1)(b), states that when parking requirements are applied to new development or a change in use, said parking requirements may be reduced by one parking space on a one-time only basis. This reduces the parking requirement to 21 spaces, which have been provided. Density: Within the CBD zone district, residential projects with a density of up to 30 units per acre are a permitted use. The proposed 10-unit townhouse development represents 21.28 units per acre, thereby meeting this requirement. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting must be provided. A site lighting and photometrics plan has been submitted to ensure compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8. A light pole with a decorative coach style lantern is proposed at each corner of the property. Wall mounted decorative "carriage" style light fixtures will be mounted beside each unit's entrance in the front and rear of the buildings. In addition, wall mounted floodlights are also proposed in order to adequately illuminate the parking court. Finally, six hanging, decorative coach style lanterns are proposed within the entrance arches. The DDA (Downtown Development Authority) recommended that pole mounted decorative light fixtures are provided for within the adjacent rights-of-way (1st Avenue and 1st Street). It was also recommended that the decorative light poles match those, which exist along Atlantic Avenue. These items have been attached as conditions of approval. An additional condition of approval is that all site lighting be indicated on the landscape plan and site plan to prevent conflicts with site improvements and landscaping. Stacking Distance: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), provisions must be made for stacking and transition of incoming traffic from a public street, such that traffic may not backup into the public street system. The minimum distance between the right-of-way line of a local street and the first parking space or aisle way in a parking lot containing between 21 and 50 parking spaces shall be 20 feet. LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(3) states that the • length of the stacking area may be reduced when supported by a traffic study. There are two means of ingress/egress to the site (1st Avenue and the alley). After right-of-way dedication for the sidewalk on NE 1st Avenue, the stacking distance provided will be 11', while 17' is proposed adjacent to the alley. The proposed residential use will only generate 70 vehicular trips a day, which will enter and exit the site via the 2 driveways. Given the low traffic volumes and the multiple driveways, there are no problems anticipated with stacking. Therefore, the reduction of the 20' stacking distance to 11' and 17' is acceptable. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations—Neal's Market Townhomes Page 4 Visibility at Intersections: Driveways: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.14(A)(1), the sight visibility triangle at a driveway/accessway must be 20'. This requirement has been met at the east and west entrances to the parking court where a 3' high stucco wall is proposed. The 3' high wall connects to a decorative entrance arch, which is situated over the drive aisles of the parking court entrances. Street and Alley Intersections: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.14(A)(2) when property abuts the intersection of 2 public rights-of-way, all landscaping within the triangular area [two (2) sides of the triangle being 40' in length along the abutting public right-of-way lines, measured from their point of intersection, and the third side being a line connecting the ends of the other 2 lines] shall provide unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 3' and 6' in height. At the intersection of NE 1st Street and NE 1st Avenue and the intersection of NE 1st Street and the north/south alley, reduced sight visibility triangles have been provided (approximately 26' — 27'6"). The applicant has requested a waiver to the requirement. Prior to granting a waiver, the Board shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, d) Does not result in the granting of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. The landscaping at the southwest and southeast corners of the site (at the intersections of NE 1st Street & NE 1st Avenue and the north/south alley and NE 1st Street) encroach into this sight visibility triangle. There is a concern with the proposed Live Oaks as they become mature, and their trunks become larger. NE 1st Street is currently one-way westbound, therefore there is not the same concern with visibility at the alley that there would be at an intersection with opposing traffic. However, there has been discussion in the past among City officials and the Pineapple Grove Main Street Advisory Board regarding the possible conversion of this street and SE 1st Street to two-way traffic. To better mitigate future site visibility concerns the proposed Heritage Live Oak trees at the southwest and southeast corners of the site should be replaced with groupings of Palm trees. The waiver does not affect the provision of public facilities nor should it affect the neighboring area. The granting of the waiver will not result in the grant of a special privilege as similar waivers were granted for recent development along NE 1st Street (Creations of Delray Beach, Town Square). The waiver should not result in an unsafe situation provided the proposed Live Oaks are replaced with palms, which is attached as a condition of approval. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations—Neal's Market Townhomes Page 5 Right-of-Way Dedication: Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2) and the Transportation Element of the City Comprehensive Plan, the required right-of-way width for NE 1st Street is 55' and NE 1st Avenue is 60'. A 50' right-of-way exists for NE 1st Street and 40' for NE 1st Avenue. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(4), a reduction in right-of-way widths for existing streets may be granted by the City Engineer upon favorable recommendation from the Development Services Management Group (DSMG). However, upon reviewing the proposal DSMG recommended that at least 5' of right-of-way be dedicated or a sidewalk easement provided in order to accommodate the existing and proposed 5' sidewalks. The applicant has indicated that 5' of right-of-way will be dedicated adjacent to the NE 1st Street and NE 1st Avenue rights-of-way. A condition of approval is that the plat dedicate the right-of-way. If the proposal involves any changes where platting is not required, then a right-of-way deed would need to be executed. Sidewalks: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of- way adjacent to the property. A 5' sidewalk currently exists along the west side of the property adjacent to NE 1st Avenue and a 5' sidewalk is proposed along the south side of the property adjacent to NE 1st Street. The proposal includes pedestrian connections to the existing and proposed 5' sidewalks along NE 1st Street and Avenue. Therefore, this requirement has been met. As previously stated, 5' of right-of-way must be dedicated for the sidewalks. Plat: The subject property is required to be platted as the units are for fee simple ownership. An attached condition of approval is that the plat must be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS Six Live Oak trees are proposed within the parking court with a variety of groundcover and foundation plantings. Adjacent to the building within the parking court White Bird of Paradise with lxora Nora Grant and Xanadu plantings are proposed. A mix of foundation plantings and groundcover are proposed adjacent to the fronts of the townhouse units. Foxtail Palm trees are proposed at the northeast and northwest corners of site, and at the southeast and southwest corners of the site Heritage Live Oak trees are proposed. As previously discussed in the report the Heritage Live Oak trees should be replaced with groupings of Palm trees (i.e. Alexander Palms) to allow for adequate site visibility. Additional vertical elements should be included adjacent to the front side of the south building. These items have been attached as a condition of approval. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations—Neal's Market Townhomes ' Page 6 DEMOLtTJON A` NALYSeiS The development proposal includes demolition of the noncontributing Neal's market building and demolition or relocation of the contributing cottage to the east (Jo's Backroom). Demolition Guidelines: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), the HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing on the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic_district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. The Market Building, 105 NE 1st Street: The eastern portion of the Neal's Market building was constructed in 1954 by Mr. O.D. Priest, a member of one of the early Delray pioneering families. It is typical of the c.b.s. commercial vernacular buildings of the mid 50s with a flat roof and glass front doors across the south façade and metal louvers above the doors. The building is 25' wide and 60' in length. In 1960 Mr. Priest constructed a 20.5' X 60' addition to west of the 1954 structure, architect George C. Davis designed the addition. It has 3 full-length plate glass windows and a door all framed in aluminum across the front façade, above the windows and door are glass jalousies; a 2'8" canopy extends across the front facade. The wall was removed between the two buildings to create one space when Victor Neal purchased the property. Jo's Back Room, 115 NE 1st Street: The building was constructed as a single-family residence in 1925. It is of frame construction on a pier foundation with wood clapboard siding and a composition shingle roof. It is vernacular in style and retains many of its original windows and wood shutters hinged from the lintel. It is rectangular in plan with a wrap around porch across the front and a portion of the east elevation. Originally screened, the porch has been.enclosed, the house contains approximately 1,062 sq.ft. and the porch 312 sq.ft, for a total of 1,374 sq.ft. Attempts to find someone to relocate the building have failed. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations—Neal's Market Townhomes Page 7 DESIGN ;''ELEMENTS v" The architectural style of the proposed 3-story, 10-unit townhouse development is characteristic of the Mediterranean Revival style. Each 5-unit building features a yellow stucco finish and terracotta barrel tile roofs. Architectural detailing includes raised stucco banding, metal railings, false towers, decorative rafter tails, rotundas, decorative shutters, balconettes and balconies with wood trellises. Variations in window treatments have been provided. This includes square windows, single hung windows, double hung windows, windows that contain fixed glass, windows with fixed square and arched transoms, windows with sidelights, octagonal windows and arched windows. In some instances where the windows are the same style and size, variation is provided by adding different treatments around the windows such as raised stucco banding, decorative stucco columns and canvass awnings. The elevations vary from one side of the project to the other relating to its contextual surroundings, however there are similar architectural characteristics. It shall also be noted that increased setbacks as well as varied front offsets are provided for with the townhouse units. The proposed Mediterranean Revival style and design elements are consistent with the historical characteristics of the Old School Square Historic Arts District. However, the Pineapple Grove Main Street Design Review Committee recommended that the proposed style be more Floribbean or Vernacular. Additionally, the Committee recommended that elevations include a combination of wood siding and more shutters. It shall be noted that the Mediterranean Revival style is more appropriate and complimentary to the district especially given the projects' location to the Old School Square facility, which is also Mediterranean Revival in style. The Floribbean style seems to be more appropriate to the existing structures on Pineapple Grove Way. A majority of the Pineapple Grove Way structures were built between 1940 and 1960 and are very plain in style. The Floribbean style provides an economical and appropriate improvement for such structures and is not appropriate to OSSHAD. Therefore, staff feels the proposed style for the 3-story, 10-unit townhouse project is well suited for the Old School Square Historic District. Wall and Entrance Arch: A 3' high concrete block wall with a yellow, stucco finish and entrance arches is proposed along the east and west sides of the property. The arch will extend over the entrances to the parking court and feature hanging coach style lanterns. The townhouse units at the end of the two buildings also feature entrance arches which are connected to the wall. These arches also include smaller, hanging, coach style lanterns. Air Conditioning Units and Refuse Areas: The refuse areas are located on the east side of the buildings adjacent to the alley and are enclosed with a 3' high concrete block stuccoed wall with decorative gates. Air conditioning units are proposed on the west side of the buildings adjacent to NE 1st Avenue and are also enclosed with a 3' high concrete block stuccoed wall. SPRAB Staff Report - Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations—Neal's Market Townhomes Page 8 REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the following areas: Section 3.1.1 (A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of OMU (Other Mixed Use), and is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). However, pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24, Lots 7-8, Block 75 are subject to the regulations and special provisions of the CBD (Central Business District) zoning district. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(B)(4), within the CBD zoning district multiple family structures of 30 units per acre or less are allowed as a permitted use. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to consistency with the Future Land Use Map designation. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) -Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. Comprehensive Plan Policies: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable objectives or policies were noted. Future Land Use Element Objective A-1 - Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate and complies in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is complimentary to adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations—Neal's Market Townhomes Page 9 The property is developed and contains a vacant produce market and gift shop. There are no special physical or environmental characteristics of the land that would be negatively impacted by the proposed multiple family development. The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan calls for the provision of infill housing in the downtown which this development will help to fulfill. Housing Policy A-12.3: In evaluating proposals for new development or redevelopment, the City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. The subject property is located in the Old School Square Historic District and the Pineapple Grove Main Street Area, both of which contain residential uses. The proposal will be complimentary to the adjacent commercial and residential uses, as the use is lower in intensity. This project will not have a negative impact on these areas. In fact the townhomes will be compatible with, and may even enhance the value of properties located within the surrounding mixed-use neighborhood. The development will not increase noise, odor, or dust, as it will allow for the reuse and redevelopment of an existing commercial property. Open Space and Recreation Element Policy A-3.1 - Tot lots and recreation areas serving children from toddlers to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. This policy may be waived for projects in the downtown because the City recognizes the following: that households located in the downtown are likely to have fewer children than those located in suburban settings; that land in the central business district is at a premium and it can be cost prohibitive to provide recreational features such as tennis courts, volleyball courts, etc.; and, that there are other cultural and recreational opportunities located in the downtown that are not readily available to residents of suburban apartment complexes. Based on the above, this policy is met. Housing Element Objective B-2 - Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in this Element. Policies, which will implement this objective, include: Housing Element Policy B-2.2 - The development of new adult oriented communities within the City is discouraged. New housing developments shall be designed to accommodate households having a range of ages, especially families with children, and shall be required to provide 3 and 4 bedroom units and activity areas for children ranging from toddlers to teens. This requirement may be SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations-Neal's Market Townhomes • Page 10 waived or modified for residential development located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. This project will not be excluded to occupancy by adults only. However, it is acknowledged that downtown dwellings are not typically occupied by households with children. This complex will primarily accommodate young and middle-age professionals. As allowed by this policy, it is appropriate that this project not be required to provide 4 bedroom units and activity areas for children. Housing Element Policy B-2.6 - Housing in and near the downtown area, in close proximity to employment opportunities and services, is a critical need. In order to help stimulate demand for new housing in and around the Central Business District, the development of new rental housing projects outside of the TCEA and North Federal Highway area is discouraged. The development proposal complies with this policy as it provides the desired type of residential development within the OSSHAD and the CBD. Section 2.4.5 (F)(5) - Compatibility (Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bordered on the north, west and south by OSSHAD zoning and CBD zoning on the east. The adjacent land uses include: to the north, a multi-family apartment building; to the west across NE 1st Avenue, an apartment building and a single-family residence; to the south across NE 1st Street, a commercial building previously known as the Goodwill Store; and to the east across the alley, A-Z Auto Parts. The subject property was previously home to Neal's Market, a produce market, and Jo's Backroom, a gift shop. These uses had co-existed with the adjacent commercial and residential uses for many years with no known compatibility issues. The proposed townhouse development has been designed to create the least impact on adjacent properties. This proposal will help to address the need for housing in the downtown area and will contribute to the stabilization and revitalization of the area. It will also enhance property values in the area. Based on the above, a finding of compatibility can be made that the proposed development will be compatible and harmonious the adjacent and nearby properties. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of September 14, 2000 the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) recommended approval of the development proposal. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations—Neal's Market Townhomes Page 11 Downtown Development Authority: At its meeting of September 20, 2000, the DDA (Downtown Development Authority) recommended approval of the development proposal with the condition that adequate site lighting be installed and that the perimeter light poles be located in the adjacent right-of-way and be consistent with light poles us along Atlantic Avenue. Pineapple Grove Main Street Design Review Committee: At its meeting of September 19, 2000, the Committee recommended approval of the development proposal with the conditions: 1. That the entrance be improved with respect to the site visibility triangle; 2. That the arches across the driveway be eliminated; 3. That additional vertical elements such as Alexander Palms be added; 4. That 3 palm trees replace the proposed Live Oak at the corner of NE 1st Street and NE 1st Avenue; 5. That the architectural style be more Floribbean or Vernacular; and, 6. That a combination of wood siding and more shutters be included in the design. Neighborhood Notice: Special Notice was provided to the Old School Square Homeowners association. Letters of objection, if any, will be presented at the HPB meeting. ASSE=SSMEN<T AND CONCLUSION The development proposal is to construct a 10-unit townhouse development. The addition of households in the downtown area will help in the long term revitalization of the CBD. The proposed use is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations. The waiver to reduce the site visibility can be supported provided the Oak trees are changed to palms. Positive findings can be made with respect to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) regarding compatibility of the proposed use with surrounding properties, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve COA-416 and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and architectural elevations for Neal's Market Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to conditions. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations — Neal's Market Town homes Page 12 C. Deny approval of the COA-416 and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and architectural elevations for Neal's Market Townhomes, with the basis stated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Demolition: Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1) approve the demolition of the contributing and non-contributing structures located on the subject property. Waiver: Approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.14(A)(2), to reduce the site visibility corner at the intersection of NE 1st Avenue and NE 1st Street, and the intersection of NE 1st Street and the alley, from 40' to 26' — 27'6", based upon positive findings with LDR Section , 2.4.7(B)(5), with the condition that the Live Oaks be replaced with palms. ' ' r,2 Site Plan: Approve the COA-416 for the Class V site plan for Neal's Market Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. That decorative light poles, similar to those along Atlan is Avenue, be provided for within the adjacent rights-of-way; , Ail 4- 2. That the two Heritage Live Oak trees be replaced with groupings of Alexander Palm trees; 3. That 5' of right-of-way be dedicated with the plat; and, 4. That the plat be recorded prior to issuance of building permit. Landscape Plan: Approve the COA-416 for the landscape plan for Neal's Market Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations. Design Elements: Approve the COA-416 for the design elements for Neal's Market Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.18. 1 V� , L j I j t��.ice"1 ' I�:- � ,- ! SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations—Neal's Market Townhomes Page 13 Attachments: • Appendix A • Appendix B • Site Plan • Architectural Elevations • Landscape Plan Report prepared by: Michelle E. Hoyland, Planner APPENDIX A ' Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service will be provided via a service lateral connection to the existing 8" main along the east side of NE 1st Avenue. ❑ Sewer service will be provided via a service lateral connection to an 8" main located in the north/south alleyway on the east side of the property. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided as a fire hydrant is located at the southwest corner of NE 1st Street and NE 1st Avenue, approximately 50' west of the site. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to these level of service standards. Drainage: Drainage will be accommodated by an exfiltration system. There are no problems anticipated in complying with SFWMD requirements and obtaining the required surface water permit. Based upon the above positive findings may be made with respect to this level of service standard. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, and OSSHAD, as well as the West Atlantic Avenue corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Therefore, a traffic study is not required for concurrency purposes, however a traffic statement is necessary to keep a record of trips approved in the TCEA and for calculation of traffic impact fees. The applicant has submitted a statement, which indicates that development will generate 70 ADT. Parks and Open Space: The proposed units will not have a significant impact with respect to level of service standards for parks and recreation facilities. However, pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, whenever a development is proposed upon land which is not designated for park purposes in the Comprehensive Plan, an in-lieu fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of building permits for each unit. Thus, an in-lieu fee of $5,000.00 will be required of this development. Solid Waste: Trash generated each year by the residential development consisting of 10 units will be 5.22 tons per year. The increase can be accommodated by existing facilities and thus, will not have a significant impact on this level of service standard. AP'PEN'D1�C S,TAND�ARDS FOR SITE PLAN� ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land, which is zoned for residential purposes, shall be planned in a manner, which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent • SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Elevations—Neal's Market Townhomes • Page 16 G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent • ROOM OCC0107.71 Pall to.f..•.,a SITE STATISTICS - "pMt • ^ • • _ _ �'r ''� �~ • .•. 0 P.L=133.00 ft maa_p gabiry+i11WnMB • AL•twxo rtaat A6Y I,iu v. IWI a m Wel� � i�LaOO —mapdL t ABSa •# 1 t■■t• ort% vAcu I.Iu s, 14114,414 , K AU" "tl�i_ s rAiT I n. • • • • • •, :ii::•ty..::,..:. In r■ to A••.•• LWn mrA Waal.uaw • NM.w tt40[MIIL OMAROMT& 10 . •'� •.. • • •. • 1l.�7 .� •' u /rwu. •� TOW III.ITI•IIII -�SpIS.=.. ]II r,_.< /� J~ " - .�.y u-_.`- • • _._.•_1• fast UI.IT.•IItI n It0000Y 1/ LT/0 !. �� •••6 = :�- 8 9 — ■O1&L' I-.stlt stln.MiW tn.ut ' k ;.slaw. _ ,.� _ .� MIL PA .aw■m .MW it fur — i r ., inw) iim)."t ��❑© —to-m uM000 vitas iui.)f .t)x • • • r�• CYZY7 i:...'•'1•• w A a.10-011111113 .rumrw srz q17 •' • p is��. > r--' ..■*"."i^- '. ST.50 .•past M �aMYy IRA.PA■NI1 I.O,IDTO .In •.•d•.• I �f I - M-wr wslw I..v+Z _ w.a M•r.ww)IJ�MaM• A aoS s O iI iii! 'tie I n a' t'st Ian. Waif =i •• ■•Wu•iar �•�rM...• w..' L� _....__,,___zit _ L L — • •• m-'• NEAL'S 1I1 if 4f - MARKET • nat n' iY 1 p S'BPICK WALKWAY ;e:j:;i's'•il:•• GARBAGE IrAI O. tr r-� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 AREA DELAAY BEACH,FL RCM Tt0x1 scut%CAR$NO IOU f� aaw tr. rt WPM a ��;• nr flo' TI 1 t PM 201)MI • • Wax. § � var.,.m)xct "I • • ••• �'.•,� rnot..ul — 401 1.0 nxL1110[O ACTUAL .��-�/ -.•iota• A` AI-If TO t PROMO anx NC BAWL:11,00 TO ..ant rIw Cr u• - nr l0r-0• '-^'�I�� Sr4 r k —f r-a• r-r r-a• r-r .r•,r r-r ��I Z:. .. tr-r OtCi>•cmf n TOTAL Infra ar nml3 • I ' a wnl pa tlO17t TNGt,x0 oamA,max X aAl+a rm v t rirovom.STILTICtl �It�\ //��tLOTS 7 lau O Ot)!.C[IIUa■Ad,ACCOapxn c M MT ) .f }. 1:-•' MENLO,AS [COIOm YI MT Ca t.Me n 01 IN[roue •�,✓/ V 4 r-r 1, r-a• 4 If-0. L 1 / —� A 011OS CI MI ITA01 MDT,r u , �If I� Pre 10 C rrmml ttx'f r--1 014111.11011 W . L p 4 + • IMAM LOCATION • I I Q • • .. ` 3 n w I)uatrr �f Ix .1. I F 0 0 0 o S'BRICK WALKWAY o 0 o = I'•-••"^� T^� .r•Pan 1 Z S ... • •.•. �•.• P .•.•.•. Y •.q • — •' 'I WPBACE I a cr.., ,. 1pEA z I h Cw11I] .�� 1-10 13• CwSwl • I —a, Eili `�..,1/ VICINITY MAP •,Il�.�J' a"°" =--•-_4t,ra = star•°°. = ��ataa°°n yaw I I LL r_I RA,'L I �Tw . 1 • p • Tc uI3 5 ko'mI 2 _ t MAR11_1 • • . . • . a:if rid '- � �'•• •� •'•IIPt ! %i -• � RICK PAYER WALK ir — - _A _Pals►• ■ ■ n •. . . . : / v �a y 3REVISIONS Y Y P.L.173.00 f f• Q - Ir-)t/r AEQ7G'Ql� • • • • • • • • 7 � LOCATIC•114A,KM A / . :nf•/, u•-I• , Ir-r nr-r n•Par meAa•' p SITE PLAN , _LUG�I'c '-P �• TI:PLI -FIRSTFLUU� ... ............................... ........_.......-. ........._......._..._.... _._.-. ............ .. ..._......... _.._....- .... ......-..--....... b SEPTEMBER 1172000 NE I T ■ • rL Althd.Icbn 1.0.dog . • gaff+iibelabin ItirAr■elt••t■ lwmm a L ■.. • 4:.t.....::88.-8.'.4:43.. .Y.'..,,i{j [}�{ ti 210110 1.1/1..... • ® t8 El .iiiiili€�Iiii: •• iiiiil::i"ili'1ifai”i:3 I fMPIMI`* ems• . .nlu.o n.ru. ®— p _— :1\4/Z a ..� -- 1111 n1-nl-.111 1111 III 11.111111 __ ■ �111011 .'! 10.1 n1-n1-u.. lioninn r IIIIIt11i '• , 1..181 lunn.lul„„.l„ (IIII I.IIIII IIIIIII �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. IIIIIII]tI[IIIIIII (IIIIIII'1111111 11111111! IIIIII IIIIIIIIIII ••,IIII L C b n.'".1m1x �wli E11 li t�� MM 11 0111 �� i 11 b .. .MwF : . Mal ��a■M III,;IIII IIII,;IIII IIIC;IIII '°°°'" T. ° '"«.M �II��II�IIII i �� ,i I �'1^ -�.: r1o`eV.°s..e i .....M'wr�M M1.w1 fMW mm .grnIlmlo•oral swan.. • NI NEAL'S MARKET \'•1 ELEVATION rROM /LE. 1ST STREET DELRAY BEACH,FL • • .,;...,. ..t........... • :1ar:: t. mxm-- ..:: ® ® :711I mail .... L: . ....vu IIII t k T. ,'u' ilinC!Cii ® !ICCIIVVIC 'II _I!!!! n if!lino ® i�ii;Iii;i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I ..,.„•1., . n n �� • } III ill ® ' _ i m : 1 miii iu et ®if wee � . III tl• � _ in l in n n .,1,11 ELEVATION LOOKING SOUTH FROM MOTOR COURT i ” ii r�• iri :_ „mom ee „'u. i, It in l) a L al IIIIIIIIIIIIII ;�n `;�� IIIIIIIIIIIII LIiT REVISIONS As ram ^ \ ELEVATION FROM N.E. •IST .....E BEIMAB�EF16 A-4.0 GUrchlecitreThrfortsllissilercenr.syeerro,Wtk1CRIMv MI261 Baba+$IFbatats1 Ar.b'tests e.. . , ..,.` f I— /OA /.Y.� II.J I1 ISO m.III.nu :..IMI III" (I1ii111 i I'll. Bllr:l 0 �( 11 1...rtr,•„tt,.,ei�......e„ IIII IIIIIIIIIII'IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII111111111111 1111111III) f 11 • N al; imi En I. — .•.....,ti+.•.,r.•..... T iiitl li 11 RIM It =� NI 1 e 111 i�l �IS �� in 1�� I�1 1� illie OM 1 4.r...we ww IIII:IIII Illf;llll IIII;;IIII IIII;;IIII IIII;;IIII �,; M, , n.•',�. /1 L.. . `��--' l,.m`"..u:o�wn`.n..: .irr. .r w.r• • , ornicE, InII®� fir, II.I I S .. .. 1 _ ;��r:„�„ll — NEAL'S MARKET 0NOR Ill ELEVATION...... ..........._................... ._._ ..:......... ............ DELRAY BEACH,FL ti t 1� 41 9—t—e 9 iiu . ___- b iii;iii iii iii �'ii,iii iii=1= — IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111r1iill IIIIIIIIIIill _.,. ITI Z Z ui �� ITi a II . "' rT T — z,. .m } ul ul 10 111 111 1 f u 1 tl 1 i 0 ui 11 y 1�1 III 1a i 1. .1 11 1; 111 1110 1�1 • u ELEVATION LOCKING NOR RI FROM MOTOR COURT WM.ill V.�,W,e ai::E::::tlt: :i::::::Yt1: >tt r. a. I•i.:: • 00, \I=wa, 1' b ;;;'_I IIIIII i M IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII mllul,amull IIIIIIIIIIIII ,,r''�'' �_ ,.'�� IIIIIIIIIIIII �Ill;lne! ;• _ .ate :: � � .�_ � w �� gin:= _ r— I— °r _ I _ REVISIONS m r \l ELEYAT10N9 / \l ELEVA'MN FROM ALLEY _........_. 3EPIEIJBFA t,2000 / A-5.0( . GMeshikinVicfoctillorkeemsOCCONIV.2h1263q + i t , , . . ' ' . • • , a . . • • FT..1 •tx.ri Y NB' I.T TX!r-r.X CU./I I T..1.17..il.1°-.1.-X Ll LT I XT-T1J(1 LW 1LT It 1 1 up + /a . EEL EY or ' '.'4,-,:w0. 14":0.00 0 0 0 0.000,0,0,. • -owoms000ryo:oollro t..,-.., ::r SWIM. ' ; 9;'1.;:t0410C-1*!1"1-1" ' ' 4-0 el 0 0 0.0 0 i):10 0 r' .:,4 Co•.•,.f. , ,c.. , •skes.,- .,igqr,ja mop.o..674g. {P, .,&••,0 C .100,0000 .0. •.0., sew, JERRY TURNER . 1.,Fp o 0 0 C Otof•. , I 00. Jp.. . ,,746,,"5 & ASSOCIATES III 4(1.0 ce° V k 1 1111 vy 4anq-• ^n,c.r ILMINNI § 6 ii NK isoonerms LAM MOM 4 gl 4:: . 6) walemensa.WINN 1 a ;0, N.111 IMEMPlarime . i .0' *110 TY 0.1 Ir.' itir yi er to. ,'MI 4:4':.: ' AR 111 A yr tikill jig 1 ' - jm i i I 1 0 Iggarilem ape• MOM, • i ..ur.. 137 . . _ ::4; et :14). t1M.,."1/g/t1 iMIEM I..N'i 7 t/N;I=.../V.°1:-/V2a1:•• i:WMtivil • NEALS p '4: iiiIMENr....7!firlikililaMMINNINIMENIT . P. 1 § 8 qi:44 12 °I ..P 0 41 ZrArl, Ili 1:17g1:: MARKET 1 .4,, rei . pai I I P ti:; $6441V &TA t Wail Mount Coach U.Itt .1:4 i l4 1 1 hw UT El I feji,T,' 4 rO, ti e.7.% . i $.4,40:,00.0 ,:ar, Ncy is role Mount Coach Light I VI AN:,1 Ey lir 1 0:,,44,CI o 1-/F TY NUMMI INIMPV .4Vi PK V,, Noivr, 1110111.w w 8 z < 0 5 Wray Dm*Florida Anv it, 6 l=> 8/16100 • ' I Ill la -4 4 Nov , —4) —CD e— 411111. 1 z Ili!'" Ari,Rfj%1,.. CI EP I i f lify V17 19 Lel kl*Oti Er .,,.. .4.,. .. lit 0,4,P007 , .A,0•00 0 0 A lEr 01711111 v-zr Ill Vir 4 IMMM #1041'C'': iyil 1 § • •0:03 .401111.IMIN II 1 thomili ii— 111'43E11AI :ail .....aiiiiii ---wiliamc 4-g A111111111111111111.0mmummioeeratmumma 0 6 .../44.1.,.it, . .I '...1:,:.:4,..W.Nur'.,,....vm..c,t,.....•,irei OOJ.1r,mse...._...,m, 7,i. , 15 i -11 in". -4.111111' 11.1.311.1111-. .1t1. 11111 ". 1-,....4 MI p" Ar!.. 1101.4....114••••• ••• 01111-111' 71 In .1 ltrl -•-• ALIA Ara. 44r Illiggigt Of 41414:40momm•Leritimamms• vr.tir irstmlioo MIL . 1 g ral.4,44.!•4, '#.•`1111 * VT Il ! lir * 419 p'- Alek4k4 r7:1**4-1,•9:11'.61t0"' 1.11 1-anclacape . I AIM EOM as 1.04-......e..., v.?:..: .......-....,..,,,,.. C....11.1414:10 :::':',$'110.0.03.i4,1,1e1V;tVetiYAKbe../glit.,,t.,1:4410 111) V1'sit•ci::;:t4.47/0(10°0914114. ,1..r:lki!pa..•••;°41,T /OVA k 9 4 4.0VAM, g4'061300.1a:st69890%9POCriregiere°660el ;'„opitr.500•015404*;::. 1:•Yo.ti.u5x01.::: : ".7::rsCr.o... ./.. .../....... .4.MU... . ... . *mule Plan 1 0 0 I n .....--......._ e a V8013 MONO MANILA TO REMAIN Era Tr V' fig LT. . @ Ea MP' La 414.0.1110.441 4114•••••• • 'N...., .;, lir Nur ---.," gm WY 5 —S trIPH." L-1 i417; yr NE 1ST STREET OF 2 • • f . J_ HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: October 4, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: III.A. • ITEM: Consideration of COA-417 Which Incorporates the Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes, Located on the West Side of Marine Way, Approximately 840' South of East Atlantic Avenue _ II III i' 1 i N.E. 1ST ST. - < VETERANS < < PARK _ _ _ = ATLANTIC GENERAL DATA: - 0 PLAZA w w ' Owner/Applicant North Atlantic Realty Corp. �Z I I l y , Agent Eliopoulos & Associates, Inc. ATLANTIC AVENUE Gary Eliopoulos 1 1 ,III Location West side of Marine Way, approximately 840' south of : East Atlantic Avenue. ; `F 1 Property Size .98 acres _ ` i<l 1 --1 Future Land Use Map Medium Density Residential S.E. 1ST ST. '= 5-12 units/acre BUD _ . i mii I r I Current Zoning RM (Multiple Family imu`<.<_.._: um� �. . Residential-Medium Density) - Adjacent Zoning North: RM - mi En East: CF (Community Facilities) _ = rr ,= South: RM S.E. 2ND ST. West: RM - I < 1 <'�m.-_ Existing Land Use Six (6) separate residential - Ei I• - 1 . rental apartment buildings - _ `mm m containing 33 residential �f i�No units total. - .' mu • Proposed Land Use Construction of a 2-story and - S.E 3RD ST t- 3-story 8-unit townhouse =� ��f I o building with pools, gazebos mi c. and gardens. Construction __'§, 0 1 c. of a 2-story duplex structure -��I Z z with in-ground spas and _um gardens. SE 4T;; S_ —hater Service Existing on site. 1 ( 1 I I `--1 sewer Service Existing on site. ` i 1 r N q 1 1 I I-- "Il-T' III.A. L • [ ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is approval of COA-417, which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Marina Bay Townhomes (8 fee simple townhouse units and 1 duplex structure) pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F) ❑ Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; and D Architectural Elevations. ❑ Demolition of contributing and noncontributing residential structures; and, ❑ Waiver to the following requirement: LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a) —A request to reduce the perimeter landscaping adjacent to the interior street system on the west side of the property from 5' to 4'6". ❑ Variances to the following requirement: LDR Section 4.3.4(K) —A request to reduce the front and side setbacks (described in further detail in the Variance Analysis section of this report). BACKGROUND, The subject property is located on the west side of Marine Way, approximately 226' south of SE 1st Avenue. The .98 acre site consists of Lots 8,9,10,11,12, and 19, a Subdivision of Block 126, is within the Marina Historic District and is zoned RM (Medium Density Residential). The site currently contains a multi-family development, which is located in several buildings containing a total of 33 units. The structures are to be demolished as part of this development proposal. Much of the area comprising the Marina Historic District was originally a tropical plant nursery owned by the pioneering Blank family who migrated to Delray from Michigan in 1905. Many of the beautiful trees in the district owe their beginnings to the Blank's Nursery. The beginning date for building lots platted in Block 126 was 1925, which was shortly before the Florida Land Boom ended in 1926 and virtually all new construction ceased. Therefore, with the exception of only one or two structures, the earliest buildings in the Marina Historic District date from the mid 1930s. 124 Marine Way (Harbor House): The City's records indicate the site (0.492 acres) was developed between 1951 and 1954 as a 22-unit apartment hotel with an attached manager's office/apartment. 132 Marine Way (Harbor Inn): The City's records indicate the 0.164 acre site was developed between 1937 and 1938 as a single-family residence. Sometime between 1938 and 1990 the site was converted into a six-unit apartment, and the property was cited by the Code Enforcement Division. In 1992, the building was converted back to two units. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 2 136 Marine Way (Harbor Villas): The City's records indicate that Lot 12 (0.164 acres) was developed in 1952 with a two-story duplex and single story residence. Lot 19 (0.164 acres) was developed in 1952 as a two- story duplex. In 1957 Lots 12 and 19, Block 126 were combined, thereby creating a 0.328 acre site known as the Portofina apartments. In 1968 a second floor addition was made to the existing single story residence on Lot 12 to accommodate three rental units. There are no records or building permits indicating the legal conversion of this structure to an apartment. PROJECT",DESCRIPTION The development proposal incorporates the following: ❑ Demolition of the noncontributing Harbor House apartment buildings. ❑ Construction of a 2-story and 3-story, 8-unit townhouse building with pools, gazebos and gardens. ❑ Construction of a 2-story duplex structure with in-ground spas and gardens. ❑ Construction of an internal street system. Cl Construction of a 4-space parking area, which will serve the duplex structure. ❑ Installation of landscaping, walkways and site lighting. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: . The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the RM zoning district: Standard Proposed Maximum Building Height ` 35' 34'3"' Minimum Building Setbacks See Variance Analysis Below Minimum Floor Area Three Bedroom 1,250 sq. 2,870sq.ft.- ft. 4,610sq.ft Maximum Lot Coverage 40% 35.4% Minimum Open Space 25% 25.66% SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. . Page 3 Variance Analysis: Building Setbacks: While the townhouse structure complies with the 25' front setback for the two-story portion and 30' front setback for the three-story portion, the development proposal includes a number of variance requests from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the following setbacks: 135 SE 7th Avenue The front setback requirement is twenty-five feet (25'); the variances requested from the front property line are as follows from north to south: • Reduce the front setback to fourteen feet (14') for a distance of 6' to allow an in-ground spa to be constructed. • Reduce the front setback to seventeen feet eight inches (17'8") for a distance of 22' to allow the duplex to be constructed. The north side setback requirement is fifteen feet (15'); the variances requested from the north property line are as follows from west to east: • Reduce the north side setback to five feet for a distance of 8' to allow an in-ground spa to be constructed; • Reduce the north side setback to ten feet for a distance of 87' to allow the duplex to be constructed; • Reduce the north side setback to four feet for a distance of 17' to allow a pergola type carport to be constructed. The south side setback requirement is fifteen feet (15'); the variances requested from south property line are as follows from west to east: - • Reduce the south side setback to 10' for a distance of 100' to allow the duplex to be constructed; • Reduce the south side setback to 3' for a distance of 4' to allow an in-ground spa to be constructed; • Reduce the south side setback to 8' for a distance of 18' to allow a pergola type carport to be constructed. 124, 132 and 136 Marine Way (Harbor House Apartments) The front setback requirement is twenty-five feet (25'); the variances requested from the front property line are as follows from north to south: • Reduce the front setback to 8' for a distance of 25' to allow a pool and gazebo to be constructed for the north townhouse unit; • Reduce the front setback to 10' for a distance of 128' to allow 6 pools and 6 gazebos to be constructed for 6 of the townhouse units; SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 4 • Reduce the front setback to 8' for a distance of 25' to allow a pool and gazebo to be constructed for the south townhouse unit. The north and south side setback requirement is fifteen feet (15'); the variances requested from the north and south property lines are as follows from west to east: • Reduce the side setback to 10' for a distance of 65' to allow the north townhouse unit to be constructed; • Reduce the side setback to 0' for a distance of 10' to allow a trellis to be constructed; • Reduce the side setback to 5' to allow a gazebo to be constructed. The original project design was to provide a standard townhouse and duplex development with garage doors and parking located in the front yards. At staff's suggestion, the applicant implemented a traditional neighborhood type of design by providing garages and parking in the rear, which accommodates a more pedestrian friendly streetscape. By providing this design concept, the townhouse structure was separated in the middle to accommodate the access drive, therefore the side setbacks were reduced accordingly. With relocation of the vehicular access to the rear, the courtyards with pools, which are standard for this type of development, were relocated to the front yard. If the pools were located in the rear of the structure, a variance would not be necessary. The proposed gazebos provide more variation to the front elevations and provide a nice entry feature. With regard to the duplex structure, in order to provide a similar design as the townhouses and provide a quality for sale product on a narrow parcel, the variances are supportable. It is noted that the public notice regarding the variances indicated that the front building setback (SE 7th Avenue) would be reduced to 17'-8" and the spa would be set back 14'. After the 5' right-of-way dedication, the setbacks would be reduced accordingly to 12'-8" and 9'. These particular variances must be re-advertised and heard by the Board at a subsequent meeting. Action on the other variances and the site plan can occur at this time subject to the conditions that variances be obtained to reduce the front building and spa setback requirements adjacent to SE 7th Avenue. Another alternative would be to take action on the advertised variances. The requested variances appear to meet the required basis provided in Section 4.5.1(J), regarding the preservation of historic character and the adaptive reuse of the property (See attached Appendix C). LDR Section 4.4.6 RM Zone District: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.6 (A) Purpose and Intent: The Medium Density Residential (RM) District provides a residential zoning district with flexible densities having a base of six (6) units per acre and a maximum of twelve (12) units per acre. The actual density of a particular RM development is based upon its ability to achieve certain performance standards which are intended to mitigate the impacts of the increased density and ensure that the project is compatible with surrounding land uses. Further, the Medium Density Residential District provides for implementation of those objectives and policies contained within the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan which call for accommodating a variety of housing types. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. , Page 5 LDR Section 4.4.6(I) Performance Standards: 1) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.6(1)(1) These standards shall apply to all site plans approved subsequent to October 7, 1997, and for modifications to existing developments which involve the creation of additional residential units. In order to increase a project density beyond six (6) units per acre, the approving body must make a finding that the development substantially complies with the performance standards listed in this section. The intent of the standards is to mitigate the impacts of the additional density both internal and external to the site. The extent to which a project meets the standards will determine the number of units per acre that will be permitted. For example, if a project meets or exceeds all of the standards, and is otherwise consistent with applicable standards and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations, the maximum density is permitted. Projects which only partially achieve these standards will be permitted a correspondingly lower density. 2) In addition to the above, LDR Section 4.4.6(1)(2), it is acknowledged that some of the above referenced standards may not be entirely applicable to small, infill type residential projects. For those types of projects, the ultimate density should be based upon the attainment of those standards, which are applicable, as well as the development's ability to meet or exceed other minimum code requirements. The performance standards are as follows: (a) The traffic circulation system is designed to control speed and reduce volumes on the interior and exterior street network. This can be accomplished through the use of traffic calming devices;street networks consisting of loops and short segments; multiple entrances and exits into the development; and similar measures that are intended to minimize through traffic and keep speeds within the development at or below 20 m.p.h. The proposal is an infill development, which reduces the overall number of units on the property from 33 units to 10 units (8 townhouse units and 2 duplex units). This standard would not be applicable if each unit had a driveway to the adjacent public right-of-way (Marine Way and SE 7th Avenue). However, the only vehicular access is the proposed interior street system, which is accesses the rear of the townhouse units. The access • road acts more as an alley and has short segments with a gated entry. Thus, this standard has been met. (b) Buildings are placed throughout the development in a manner that reduces the overall massing, and provides a feeling of open space. The proposal involves the installation of one 8-unit townhouse building and one 2-unit duplex building. The 8-unit townhouse building is 228' wide and the duplex building is 40' wide. The elevations have varying setbacks and roof lines, which helps to break up the massing. Also, the end townhouse units are two-story while the interior townhouse units are three-story, which reduces the overall massing from the adjacent properties to the north and south. Thus, this performance standard has been met. . .SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 6 (c) Where immediately adjacent to residential zoning districts having a lower density, building setbacks and landscape materials along those adjacent property lines are increased beyond the required minimums in order to provide a meaningful buffer to those lower density areas. Building setbacks are increased by at least 25% of the required minimum; at least one tree per 30 linear feet (or fraction thereof) is provided; trees exceed the required height at time of planting by 25% or more; and a hedge, wall or fence is provided as a visual buffer between the properties. While this standard is not applicable as the surrounding residential zoning is the same as the subject property (RM) and has the same density range, the following analysis has been provided. Variances have been requested to the side interior building setbacks as well as the front setback to accommodate one-story gazebos. However, the townhouse building complies with the front setback and exceeds the setbacks from the properties to the west (47'-51'). The landscape code has been exceeded and extra measures have been taken to enhance the landscaping throughout the site in that a good variety of plant materials is being proposed. Additionally, the units offer a mix of garden areas, pools or spas, gazebos and walls between properties. (d) The development offers a varied streetscape and building design. For example, setbacks are staggered and offset, with varying roof heights (for multi- family buildings, the planes of the facades are offset to add interest and distinguish individual units). Building elevations incorporate diversity in window and door shapes and locations; features such as balconies, arches, porches, courtyards; and design elements such as shutters, window mullions, quoins, decorative tiles, etc. The building contains a number of architectural features such as raised stucco banding, decorative rafter tails and support brackets, cedar wood shutters, decorative chimneys, a decorative cupola, balconies with metal railings and variations in window treatments. The buildings also have varying roof heights, -as well as staggered and offset building setbacks. These elements provide for a varied streetscape and building design. Therefore, the development meets and exceeds this requirement. (e) A number of different unit types, sizes and floor plans are available within the development in order to accommodate households of various ages and sizes. Multi-family housing will at a minimum have a mix of one, two and three bedroom units with varying floor plans. Single family housing (attached and detached) will at a minimum offer a mix of three and four bedroom units with varying floor plans. The development consists of 8 fee-simple (single family attached) units and one 2-unit condominiumized duplex. All of the units contain 3 bedrooms each with varying floor plans. Based upon the above, this performance standard has been met. (t) The development is designed to preserve and enhance existing natural areas and/or water bodies. Where no such areas exist, new areas, which provide open space and native habitat, are created and incorporated into the project. SPRAB Staff Report • Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 7 The site has been disturbed and thus, no natural areas exist on site to be preserved. However, a multitude of existing landscaping which exists on site is to be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan. While this performance standard has not been met, typically an infill development of this size (0.98 acres) would not provide a native habitat area. (g) The project provides a convenient and extensive bicycle/pedestrian network, and access to available transit. While this standard is not applicable, this proposal has been designed to provide a pedestrian friendly development with direct pedestrian access from the courtyards to the public sidewalk system on SE 7th Avenue and the proposed sidewalk on Marine Way. In conclusion, the only applicable performance standards appear to be (a), (b), (d), and (e), and a finding of substantial compliance can be made with respect to these standards. In terms of the performance standards requirements-for the RM zoning district, the proposed density of 10.2 units per acre can be supported. LDR Section 4.4.6 (H) (Special Regulations - RM zone district): Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.6(H)(3) (Special Regulations), recreational areas shall be required for all new rental apartment developments, and of owner occupied developments which have homeowner associations that must care for retention areas, private streets or common areas. New developments must include recreational features that are designed to accommodate activities for children and youth of all age ranges. Tot lots are appropriate for toddlers; features such as a basketball court, volleyball court, and open playfields are appropriate for older children. A pool and clubhouse, unless specifically designed for children, is not considered to meet this requirement. Projects having fewer than 25 units may be exempted from this standard where it is determined by the approving that it is not practical or feasible to comply. This development will consist of eight fee-simple townhouses and one condominiumized duplex with a homeowners association. As there are only 10-units, it is not practical to require a tot lot or recreation areas/swimming pools. It is noted, however, that the townhouse units include swimming pools, garden areas and gazebos and the duplex units include in- ground spas and garden areas. In this situation, installation of playground equipment should be left to the property/unit owner, as it would be for infill single family dwellings or duplexes. LDR Section 4.3.3(0) Special Requirements for Townhouses: Design Standards (The development proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.3(0), except as follows): The applicant has requested that an internal adjustment be granted for LDR Section 4.3.3(0)(3)(b), which indicates that setbacks interior to the project shall be measured from the platted street system. Concurrent with granting relief from a development standard or regulation, the granting body must find that such relief does not diminish the practical application of the affected regulation and that by granting such relief a superior development product will result. SPRAB Staff Report .Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 8 The rear setback for the eight townhouse units is taken from the T-shaped interior street system, which is located in the center and on the west side of the property. The required setback is 25' for the two story townhouses and 30' for the three story townhouses. The proposed setbacks range from 10' to 14' on the second and third floors and 18' to 22' on the first floor. Including the 24' wide street system and the 5' wide landscaped area, a total of 47'-51' will separate the buildings from the ultimate property line in the rear. This design increases the setback from the residential properties to the west while increasing the amount of open space in the front of the townhouse units. The access road primarily serves more as an alley than a street, as the properties will have frontage on the adjacent streets (Marine Way and SE 7th Avenue). The orientation of the buildings provides a more pedestrian friendly streetscape and design concepts of a traditional neighborhood development. Usually setbacks from alleys are less than street setbacks. In addition to the proposed two car garages, the proposed minimum 18' setback on the first floor will allow two cars to park in each driveway. The proposed decrease in setbacks does not diminish the practical application of the regulation. A superior development project results as there are no driveways in the front yards or garage doors facing the street, which provides a pedestrian friendly streetscape. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Parking: Pursuant to Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(c), 25 parking spaces (2.5 spaces per unit x 10 units = 25 spaces) are required for this 10-unit townhouse development. The proposed development provides two-car garages for the 8 townhouse units and 4 surface parking spaces for the duplex structure, for a total of 20 total spaces. While eight of the units have two-car garages and two parking spaces in the driveway, tandem parking spaces are only allowed in conjunction with single family detached residences and duplexes [Ref. LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(a) and (b)]. Without credit for the tandem spaces only 20 spaces have been provided. The applicant has requested a reduction in the required parking pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(1)(g), to reduce the required parking to 20 in that tandem parking can be utilized to provide an additional 16 parking spaces. An additional 16 parking spaces can be accommodated in a tandem configuration if the driveways of the townhouses are utilized. The proposed parking in the garages and associated driveway configuration function as single family or duplex developments, wherein, ' guest parking is provided at each individual lot. A reduction is recommended based upon the specific development proposal, as granting the reduction will not infer that only two spaces are needed for each unit, but that the driveways will be utilized for parking. The City has approved similar parking space reductions under similar circumstances. Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting must be provided. A site lighting and photometrics plan has been provided to ensure compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8. Six concrete light poles are proposed throughout the site, which feature decorative acorn style lanterns. There are wall mounted decorative industrial style light fixtures, which will flank the garages and the entrances to the north and south units. However, wall mounted light fixtures SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 9 were not indicated for the duplexes. A condition of approval is that the duplexes have wall mounted light fixtures adjacent to the individual entrances. The applicant should also consider including lighting on the east side of the property adjacent to Marine Way. An additional condition of approval is that all site lighting be indicated on the landscape plan and site plan to prevent conflicts with site improvements and landscaping. Visibility at Intersections: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.14(A)(1), the sight visibility triangle at a driveway/accessway must be 20'. The sight visibility triangle shall consist of both sides of an accessway formed by the intersection of each side of the accessway and the public right-of-way, with two sides of each triangle being twenty (20) feet in length from the point of intersection and the 3rd being a line connecting the ends of the other 2 sides. Additionally, unobstructed cross- visibility shall be provided at a level between 3' and 6' in height. This requirement has not been met at the entrance of the development where a 5' high decorative metal fence is proposed within the site visibility triangle, thus reducing the sight distance triangle to 6'. The applicant has requested a waiver to the requirement. Prior to granting a waiver, the Board shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, d) Does not result in the granting of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. While the required 20' sight distance triangle has not been met (5' proposed), there will be an additional 6' of driveway before the proposed sidewalk (11') and 20' before the edge of pavement of Marine Way. This effectively provides adequate sight visibility. The waiver does not affect the provision of public facilities nor should it affect the neighboring area. The granting of the waiver will not result in the grant of a special privilege as similar waivers have been granted for similar circumstances. The waiver should not result in an unsafe situation. LDR Section 5.3.1 (Right-of-way Dedication): Per LDR Section 5.3.1 right-of-way dedications to meet minimum standards must be made with all developments. The required right-of-way width for SE 7th Avenue is 60' and 40' is currently provided. For existing streets, reductions in right-of-way width may be granted by the City Engineer upon a favorable recommendation from the Development Services Management Group (DSMG). The City Engineer and DSMG approved the reduction in the right-of-way to 50, thus an additional 5' of right-of-way must be dedicated from this development. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. LDR section 6.1.3 (Sidewalks): Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-way adjacent to the property. A 5' sidewalk is proposed along the east side of the property (Marine Way). It shall be noted that the installation of the 5' sidewalk along Marine Way is .SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 10 part of the Marine Way road improvements and will be installed by the City of Delray Beach. The proposal also includes pedestrian connections to the proposed sidewalk along Marine Way. A 5' sidewalk exists along SE 7th Avenue. Plat: The subject property is required to be platted as the units are to be for fee simple ownership. As the proposal involves reconfiguration of lot lines and easement dedications, a subdivision plat must be processed pursuant to Chapter 5 of the Land Development Regulations. The plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits. Recordation of the plat is a condition of approval. An attached condition of approval is that the plat must be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS Existing Coconut Palms are to be relocated along the west property line (behind the townhouse row) and under planted with a Ficus hedge. In front of the Ficus hedge a combination of Cocoplum and Croton are proposed. Relocated Sabal Palms under planted with a massing of Cocoplum are proposed at the northwest corner of the site. Satin Leaf trees under planted with a variety of ground covers and shrubs are proposed within the landscape islands that separate the driveways. A Coconut Palm, accent plant (standard), and a variety of shrubs and ground covers are proposed within the front yard of each townhouse. While each planting bed will contain a different variety of plant material, it has been designed to provide a unified look along Marine Way. A Coconut Palm under planted with Liriope and Pentas are proposed within the landscape nodes located within Marine Way. Each townhouse has a courtyard, which is situated in the front of the units including a pool, deck, gazebo and tropical plantings. While the landscape design within the courtyards is similar, a variety of landscape materials are utilized to provide diversity. A similar landscape scheme as described above is provided around the duplex structure. Trees 14' in height are to be installed along the north and south property lines to help buffer and soften the visual massing of the proposed structures from the adjacent properties. LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), requires a 5' landscape strip between the vehicular use area and the abutting property and only 4'-6" is proposed along the west property line behind the townhouse row. The applicant has requested that the 5' requirement be waived in order to accommodate the 6" wide curb along the driveway aisle. Waiver Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. SPRAB Staff Report • Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 11 The request involves a landscape requirement, and does not affect the provision of public facilities. The granting of the waiver will not result in the grant of a special privilege, as the waiver would be granted in other similar situations. The waiver will not affect the neighboring areas, as the same amount of required landscaping can be installed within the 4'-6" landscape strip. Further, the landscaping provided within this buffer is dense and exceeds code requirements. Based upon the above, staff supports the waiver request. DEMOLITION ANALYSIS Harbor House, 124 Marine Way: The 2 story, 22 unit apartment/hotel (plus manager's apartment/office) building was constructed in 1951. It is a c.b.s. structure, designed by Delray architects Pope and Blake and built by the Thieme Company. Both firms were prominent in the City at the time the building was constructed. Except for its pleasing proportions and U shaped plan, the building has little architectural significance. Harbor House was originally built for the Waterway Realty Company, which may have been a name chosen by the developers as there is no record of a realty company of that name in the City. 132 Marine Way: The single-family residence was constructed about 1937 by builders Lawson & Waters for Mr. William Tiers. The building's plans are on file but the architect is unknown. Shortly after the building was constructed a bedroom and bath addition was built on the northwest corner of the house and a freestanding garage with storeroom was constructed to the southwest of the addition. The structure is designed in the Minimal Traditional style, which was popular in the City during the 1930s and 40s. It is of frame construction with a stucco finish and set on a concrete foundation; the gable roof is finished with composition shingles. Some of the original windows and shutters are existing, however, the original screened front porch has been enclosed and the entrance door has been relocated from the east to the south elevation. 136 Marine Way (Lot 12, Block 126): The original buildings on this site consisted of a 2-story duplex on the rear of the lot and a one story single family residence facing Marine Way. Samuel Ogren designed both buildings in 1952. In 1968 a second floor was added to the single-family residence. The second floor addition was designed by Delray Architect, Kenneth Jacobson and with the exception of the existing coins, completely altered the original Ogren design. Sliding glass doors replaced the original front windows and French doors were replaced by awning windows on the south elevation. 135 SE 7th Avenue (Lot 19, Block 126): In 1953 a small cottage on Lot 19 was demolished and the owner of 136 Marine Way constructed a garage apartment. Lots 12 and 19 were probably combined at this time, as the garage apartment is located only a few feet from the rear property line. Miami Beach Architect Lester Avery designed the garage apartment, but plans for the building have not survived. At some point the garage was converted to an additional apartment. ' SPRAB Staff Report 'Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 12 Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), The HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing on the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. None of the structures would fulfill the criteria for individual listing in the National Register, nor do they represent a level or design or craftsmanship, which could not be reproduced at a reasonable cost. The 23 unit Harbor House is the largest apartment complex in the Marina District, however there are other multifamily units built during the same time frame and in a similar style. There are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property, which are appropriate in design and character to the district and the streetscape. DESIGN ELEMENTS The architectural style of the proposed 10-unit townhouse development is best described as a contemporary version of the Florida Vernacular style. The 8-unit townhouse building features a yellow stucco finish and a standing seam metal roof finished with a green patina. Architectural detailing includes raised stucco banding, decorative rafter tails and support brackets, cedar wood shutters, decorative chimney caps, a decorative cupola, and balconies with metal railings. Variations in window treatments have been provided. This includes single hung windows, double hung windows, casement windows, bay windows and windows that contain fixed glass. For added interest, all of the windows feature raised stucco sills and lintels. Also proposed are French doors with paned glass and plate glass. Some of the French doors have decorative, cedar wood shutters. The elevations vary from one side of the project to the other but are related by their contextual surroundings and their similar architectural characteristics. It shall also be noted that increased setbacks as well as varied front offsets are provided with the townhouse units. The townhouses have attractive freestanding wood entrance gazebos with gabled roofs and decorative bracketed roof supports. The duplex structure features many of the same architectural details as the townhouses. However, the duplex also features slight Bahamian undertones. Such as the louvered Bahama shutters, the chamfered cedar wood balcony posts, an arched, stuccoed garden wall and a solid wood front door. The variations between the townhouses and the duplex are complimentary to one another. The proposed design elements for the development proposal achieve consistency with the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Marina Historic District streetscape. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. • Page 13 Fence: A 6' high wood privacy fence is proposed along the north, south and west sides of the property. Along Marine Way, a decorative metal fence is proposed. Along SE 7th Avenue a stucco wall is proposed. A wood fence is not appropriate for the proposed style of townhouse development. This wall should be continued along the north and south property lines as the wood enclosure is not the appropriate enclosure for this style of structure. However, the applicant may incorporate a wood fence along the west side of the property adjacent to the interior street system. Provision of the wall is attached condition of approval. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the following areas: Section 3.1.1 (A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of MD (Medium Density residential 5-12 du/ac) and is zoned RM (Medium Density Residential). The RM zone district is consistent with the MD Future Land Use Map designation. The proposed multiple family (townhouse) development is allowed as a permitted use in the RM zone district. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to consistency with the Future Land Use Map designation. Section 3.1.1 (B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, when all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval are addressed. Section 2.4.5 (F)(5) - Compatibility (Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. .SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 14 The subject property is bordered on the north, south and west sides by RM zoning and CF on the east. The adjacent land uses include: to the north and south, single family residences; to the west, both single and multi-family residences; and to the east, the municipal marina. The proposed townhouse development will result in a reduction of residential units from 33 to 10. The existing development has inadequate on-site parking, therefore the residents park in the adjacent right-of-way. The proposed townhouse development has been strategically designed to create the least impact on adjacent properties and provides adequate on-site parking. The proposed development of the property will be an enhancement to the area and will aid in the appreciation of nearby property values. Based on the above, a finding of compatibility can be made that the proposed development will be compatible and harmonious the adjacent and nearby properties. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable objectives and policies have been identified. Future Land Use Element: Objective A-1: - Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate and complies in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is complimentary to adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs. The property was previously developed as a 33 unit multiple family used as seasonal apartments. The proposed townhouse development with a density of 10.2 units per acre is consistent and complimentary to the existing residential development in the area. The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan calls for the provision of infill housing as well as the development of property to provide a variety of housing types. This development proposal fulfills these needs. Housing Element: Objective B-2: Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in this Element. Policies which will implement this objective include: Policy B-2.2 - The development of new adult oriented communities within the City is discouraged. New housing developments shall be designed to accommodate households having a range of ages, especially families with children, and shall be required to provide 3 and 4 bedroom units and activity areas for children ranging from toddlers to teens. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential development located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. The proposed duplex and townhomes are all three-bedroom units, which is consistent with this policy. Furthermore, each unit features pools, spas and garden areas. As discussed SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 15 previously, since the proposed development is considered an infill project with fewer than 25 units (10 units proposed), it is appropriate to waive the requirement for the provision of activity areas. Consequently, the proposed development is consistent with this housing policy. Coastal Management Element: Objective C-1: The retention, rehabilitation, and protection of historic resources as provided for in the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance shall continue to be applied in the Coastal Planning Area. The Marina Historic District shall continue to be redeveloped with a sympathetic blending of the demands of economic development and historic preservation. Policy C-1.2: The middle and southern portions of the Marina District shall continue to be enhanced through the renovation of existing single family and multi-family structures, sensitive rehabilitation of historic structures, and new construction which is appropriate to the historic district. The proposed townhouse development is located in the middle portion of the Marina Historic District. The redevelopment of the Harbor House property will eliminate an existing non- conforming situation with respect to density and parking. The improvements to the property will provide new construction that is appropriate to the district and will enhance property values in the district. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with this policy. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of September 28, 2000 the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) recommended approval of the development proposal. Public Notices: Formal public notice has been provided to property owners within a 500' radius of the subject property. Courtesy Notices: Courtesy Notices were provided to the following homeowner and civic associations: • Marina Historic District • PROD (Progressive Residents of Delray) • Presidents Council • Beach Property Owners Association • Via Marina Homeowners Association • Seagate Towers Letters of objection and support, if any, will be presented at the HPB meeting. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 16 ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal is demolish the existing 33 unit development and construct an 8- unit townhouse and a duplex. The proposal is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. While the proposal involves a number of variances and waivers, relief from the Land Development Regulations is necessary to accommodate a more pedestrian friendly development with vehicular access to the rear of the property and garden areas with pools in the front yards. Consistency with Chapter 3 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations will be achieved provided the conditions of approval are addressed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve COA-417 and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Marina Bay Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility), Section 4.4.6(1) (RM- Performance Standards), and Section 4.3.3(0) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to conditions. C. Deny COA-417 and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design J elements for Marina Bay Townhomes, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) (Setbacks), and Section 4.3.3(0) (Townhouse Requirements). STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: • Demolition Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1) approve the demolition of all of the structures located on Lots 8,9,10,11,12 and 19 of the subject property. Variance Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1) grant the variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the building setbacks as describe in the report, with the exception of the variances to the front setback along SE 7th Avenue. Waiver Approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), to reduce the required 5' perimeter landscape requirement to 4'6" along the west, north and south sides of the property adjacent to the internal roadway. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 17 Special Action Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(c), approve a request for a parking reduction of 5 parking spaces in that a total of 36 parking spaces are available utilizing tandem parking spaces for each unit. Internal Adjustment: Approve an internal adjustment to LDR Section 4.3.3(0)(3)(b) to allow 18'-22' rear setback, versus the required 25'. Site Plan: Approve COA-417 and the associated the Class V site plan for Marina Bay Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility), Section 4.4.6(1) (RM-Performance Standards), and Section 4.3.3(0) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. That a variance be granted to the front setback along SE 7th Avenue; 2. That the duplexes have wall mounted light fixtures adjacent to the individual entrances; 3. That all site lighting be indicated on the landscape plan and site plan; �. 4. That an additional 5' of right-of-way be dedicated along SE 7th Avenue; 5. That a 5' sidewalk be provided within the right-of-way along SE 7th Avenue; and, 6. That the plat be recorded prior to issuance of a building pemiit. Landscape Plan: Approve COA-417 and the associated landscape plan for Marina Bay Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations. Design Elements: Approve COA-417 and the associated design elements for Marina Bay Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.18, subject to the following condition: 1. That a 6' high stucco wall be continued along the north and south property lines. Attachments: • Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C • Site Plan, Floor Plans, Landscape Plan, Building Elevations Report prepared by: Michelle E. Hovland, Planner APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY _FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service will be provided via a service lateral connection to the existing 2" main along the east side of SE 7th Avenue and the existing 6" main along Marine Way. ❑ Sewer service will be provided via a service lateral connection to a proposed 8" main located in the internal street system of the project which will connect to the 8" sewer main within Marine Way. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided as a fire hydrant is located at the northeast corner of the site within the Marine Way right-of-way. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to these level of service standards. Drainage: Drainage will be accommodated by an exfiltration system. There are no problems anticipated in complying with SFWMD requirements and obtaining the required surface water permit. Based upon the above positive findings may be made with respect to this level of service standard. Streets and Traffic: The proposed 10-unit multiple family development will generate 70 new vehicle trips per day onto the surrounding roadway network. This is a reduction of 161 trips from the 231 currently generated by the existing 33-unit development. There is adequate capacity on the surrounding roadway network to accommodate the traffic associated with this development. It is noted that according to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, residential development east of 1-95 is exempt from meeting concurrency. Thus, the proposal complies with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Based upon the above, a positive finding can be made with respect to traffic concurrency. Parks and Open Space: The proposed units will not have a significant impact with respect to level of service standards for parks and recreation facilities. However, pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, whenever a development is proposed upon land which is not designated for park purposes in the Comprehensive Plan, an in-lieu fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of building permits for each unit. Thus, an in-lieu fee of$5,000.00 will be required of this development. Solid Waste: Trash generated each year by the proposed residential development consisting of 10 units will be 5.22 tons per year, which is less than the 17.16 tons generated by the existing 33 apartment units. Thus, this proposal will not have an impact on this level of service standard. APPENDIX B . . STANDARDS .FOR..:SITE- PLAN "ACTIONS:. A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Appropriate separation of traveiways is made for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians in a manner consistent with objective D-1 of the Traffic Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent • C. Open Space enhancements described in Open Space and Recreation Objective B-1, are appropriately addressed. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent D. That any street widening associated with the development shall not be detrimental upon desired character and cohesiveness of affected residential areas. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent - E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent - F. Vacant property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent G. In order to provide for more balance demographic mix, the development of "large scale adult oriented communities" on the remaining vacant land is discouraged. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent :APPENDIX C ; CRITERIA FOR GRANTING VARIANCES Pursuant to Section 2.4.7(A)(5), the Historic Preservation Board must make the following findings prior to granting a variance: (A) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings subject to the same zoning (The matter of economic hardship shall not constitute a basis for the granting of a variance); (B) That literal interpretation of the regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties subject to the same zoning; (C) That the special conditions and circumstances have not resulted from actions of the applicant; (D) That granting the variance will not confer into the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other lands, structures, and buildings under the same zoning. Neither the permitted, nor nonconforming use, of neighborhood lands, structures, or buildings under the same zoning shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance; (E) That the reasons set forth in the variance petition justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and, (F) That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with general purpose and intent of existing regulations, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Pursuant to Section 4.5.1(J), in acting on a variance requests the Board may also be guided by the following as an alternative to the above criteria: (1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenances, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site. (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of a historic site or a historic district. (2) Or, as an alternative to Sub-Section (J)(1), that a variance is necessary to accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of a structure within a Historic District or upon a Historic Site through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (a) The variance would not significantly diminish the historic character of the Historic District or Site (b) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to effect the adaptive reuse of an existing structure or site. (3) The Board shall otherwise follow procedures and impose conditions as required of the Board of Adjustments. 11 ELJOPOULOS MA ! io o i1>.ea a i St,.u,w,iimeTi o o°e.,ureo ones roe.e,c,a.OAT" } .u,<M:..,Der e,e n ne.e,.ON " •• nn. w,ur I,, lu r, 141.,PLOW ,� MULLnn4,u1 ALL OTITNIII SIR co<iw<nu.u"moo�ac`,°,op°rov�;i•rr.ieonre.Or —— w' n<°nrc,umu+e<,e,.:u.n".x rKT eii CIO,o....enuv.., ,<.i.cur..,,en.ue.0 uaomu<,ew ones en,ro.:o us„Mxe SE.ht mist , •n er ,w•e".eMI.x,w n<.,cMt,n omeen<e,m,ew.,nnn. ..u.E.eueeo e1 cu.ar,nw,A.n"nuo¢,uv,u rwweo -- — _. _.. __ _ �, Eta}'�� + e E $ Of.LM.P.,e"o Mp°CA UP o,.e�,.,r.,,,,..no,rG, INSTRUCT B a u,....C.v,..,e i<n..,b.. ! fIe t� ,,. ;0.,.,oxi..,11."TALlee L et e;,OI;'",o T..°CY�....�nc°e:`R.nc°RPRIOR "'e;M:.,k:'.e e.uu°e rrcunro w•rw« _... 4 t4�(I i,ueE �?�!�jj ca IMcn.,ir OP SOW..OR co.,rAnr.a.no.T.,uwzcr1.. r eri.x.ee. - -- --. ----- -- .i i^fir i e..b ,<a.,.. n,. e,,. , oan,.e„ti,,o K.e."a ea m,.eE K."O MAIM.,�,. 4l„�}r. ;R�c� I i ii �t' A3sOCIATEs,INC. .,� n, „. ..,,r,ri'Ll ANT . nr, ,.<°, , ,»e«n. MONDE ,°k WITS r �.>C AIM.. e ' ^'I _. �"�iG`�..�."13e;+.; Ardileett Mainers and .0 enu>.r>c.onw� , tA'r,Y,cw,ocmo,urt - IIIE. 1, f•�" CC v<Icm ..iinwe.„a2eo e.rALL �e°ac.NcluM,rtNn4,K,N,.R^.,.1».ENTIRE - _ ' }e` •},I,d v'aJy� nunAND ALL a nelc e°wIu Here cew"c• ecu a r— 7,''.101 . rc to...,,... o,�n°o.ee ,n. I F • c "SAT rt e , ` . aea�,. , ,.�i.r, n,. .�,�.�,»,"rn.a.r�«n,°IXn.n ._ J 1 r'' -:. . ,, IllI.>";,• 3301 .o`MK n,.. ... �,�. �,�. "gin"�,"rK.,.nr.,,,ManMor�" <,, gtel,, I tr n.co;:,."1°i`„"..°.'.oOLD« ,ae�un.eno,r..nrr�....o.K — — LOCATION MAP r..�..NTT • G ,,,.•,.,oe.o,..ueo.PI ITIE POLO.WC.NALL u.e„c„�,,.+,•eu�„o<euicc,ee°... < � tsea LI,.R � F� .«..o. .°, M,..e.KIT n<eRC."TeCt,» ".. r.entaO,.SCUP CR°°,.....e,. �MO W.•.a<R — �� .{ '•,.� t 1 n , q "PTV.Cr VE14.RTC.DRAI2,5 CrALLeR,�AMICABLE /CCM o:" r`<x•w.xeco...,,a,r.�,i. P. : fvt o o <..` eqa»q i I eo.e.<,o+!I I I Cr, M .,r ..,O BOCCIE.MK,n c.BO,PT n«O..ar<n.ad'enrm. ! zrar-�.p 1} t I' l r r Ull([r11111r1RP ST,BBT I,K,r,,, r.w,a r...,.n...,,-.,",e4 nr e I ,;.:J - r IR ;•:�: O1 e„e, �ur,... orb r�lFTt �� . ;; , 1' I1Fl: • ".WOOD e r:,. ,e «�HAW.,,°neM<r..e — — — I' • � — u �rIl l�! '11 i ri llnrurllrurll PLAT.,"CRI,Ell EAT OS • .roc a ,n At E',,,anoo ,.n r, cnu,en.r°. �e,se, f � � I�IL�I J II�11 '� IG` "`t I I 8 N'�TESs. _u.ue..rce..m,n � ,et;'tddi4:'I IF} I II F-:YY::•,::.. I ILI wp a" �."��ek h ;,a f�s�� • 1111 MARINA BAY IV a ... �p.,e, t14,4tkt d':' 1,14 i I IIIIIIII i111! _ t; o "eerie, n • fir, .,,�..._.,...,.. 41' oaa `Rx "ea,,.,ume ueo nenaewn n �. I:A. I*ItUflhfi :t1' I RR COR C•91,1 TO 010 I' I (R 7 1 r tl II i °w,,,�, • l 1I 11.eaudr a ,I FL' _ , IY �) fJ,j irl'ii/.11://11'111.111111ll OW CI 0.8 SI MANEWAYBE.aro6TA ?��I !)jl rlrrll. �:_ yJ i!11 MAR IP 0.or�< DEIJIAY BEncHR n� �d. • IV 'll� i _ III l J Ml y OIE-G.LG.A,12i,. 1...! l IYL1l. f �, ?I $I I r 6 ,•t1111 I R'dEddV ,{h} _ ' .«... ... • 1.',. ! S Ill i . i ' Il odzEirt ti ist-Tnt"Tn( ITT IIII 1,1:ii,i ` �.anarrLl, i66�..:: .: .: ��" ,i !• G9v o co� gib dhddh. _ � vr.,:.-e„r..,a „i:::•.:11.7 F77ELR�7Ntt 6ET I.. �C..C4 —CG I J d _��l'; w �� t �.+.��w v.., ...rwv.rr.r.(ae, 1 MZ",1' ^rIrr 1"=.r l I • f, ._ . _ _ _ �tr, y , .Tom,<, �, — Ia:;K.,�,< ..•�l �vL +f 4 b� _ <C tf1 L'.i.l — _ — ...,�..,..., ru.cE...cr en _d . LE'a.Np . v+„` JJ°e roo N -- ter,x,en<...� SfTE PLAN • srterLAN 4 LP.—Y M . n , .. IfU I ,.. «:: n. ... L1� • • - • i' •••"'•• ,coers A1.00 • 1 • P. .11044.0.10040.10018-000; IRJOCOULOG AM)q Z----FOR 01•00.MI 1011 rlaN 150 0' E,0 0 .,/71 1:} Et 1 .• _.._ A8BOCLATER NC. 11 Dookiners '.1 0".....II.C. fil IS • fV1:1:11;%-= '"'"' 104:511.01.111.211 6 A i: i" ', MOM MR— - . - — . - s MS ,---.,\ r n t 1 1, ) (.•if 'I•• i Cr.'ne• . y..•• %, .1. corrawno• I. t wr. 1.1 r-r Ir.' tr.r 1 ,....1.1.,...r-• tr.. t ...1. , A g '-,, •• ,I Y. .. .1 11- .: t 1 !I I! f ,4 1,;1. ,,,... )• .1,-(...1_,---.:... ,,_.) I:- )5 • .. . P. _ ..... _ 1:_-94r..irr'....t.--_.„ IlLiliir• ;.1 V....'1!i '404.0.R ../...- a.0•11Wi '.,.-.-..„.,....i. . .ill: arloolzw.," A.- ' 1 1 , •,_. -, ••$: :=:i.L .,___, -_-_::-...77...... -----77,... I I ! - A.(q..-----—71- .1 '" ..)',. 3 I 1.• ' " e :Tr = ,,,.., ,, .: i ..,:c Po. ir•• r ....1^'. ' 1.Z. . 1 " I Ke 1 '! i 7^ r 9:E II i I: it::-.--Ils,47.-1:7 t ,._li 1, MARNA BAY t 1.0 I 11 1 - ill k t 1 r 1-;•1C-J -"11' -OP / _fl'ir,,, -- ___ _. - I F...,I '254, f"ri :wmilir. / I, 4 \ — 7=7.S-11 ty ir :71f. ' ? . .. ! .., ... I --1 ,Er_Irir- ,..pr.s-P \. ._ I._ --.._.-..1....1 \-.. -.v..... -2 L I ,2.7-= ...„.'J7?;.:711: v - -a14.. -1 ... 100.... ..r..,- r. .1--7--7errI a.• =3.0 0.• 1:T21 . .-, . -. _. 1-3--if:f1 1,„'1 0, THIS- *$100 , .rif fufk aliii .. a• +Mi. ....7 OrruiTier. IP if • .,•11 0 O. II__•.!)... •• ow ..7. Zia& `-' WI,L ler - , t LITri."..,,, . /.441.1.1•001 __ @AM,.../0 '--..,.1 .. "I[r1.1.11,..1 , f +al ri&ii& — _ _ t 1:_:: 0010 NOM I? WM WAY 8P.*V BT. '-- a : . ,......., g. •31 L:-__ ''''' 1 L'''''' k .! (,(( DELRAY MENA FL -- -. - r.' -1:Fi--_1:..,-T ,rt 6,: . , - 1-. , :1 4 / -1 t 4 'IS __ _ii ..... 1 11- 't ljil j ]1—._ 1 i waime [sum. I I' [410.3 ]111 I ' -t tk-, atm. . 'a '.6 1 I I 't II. ' I 3_ L 1- t_l - L ') :-L '----I![— --:,,.i i ...... i!I Lo---r_i- -- i--- ,,i 1 1 4. ,.-. I ' Li- . I 1,..,---1---_—_-_ —- -1- —.1:11 1 '1 I I 2' ii —I.)) e 1.1'''1,2° i, 1. ,P 4, 9, r-----.,---., r --- 329.4203 -...,--. c,. +1 mc i 1 i i - Cd/OU1413 FL.00RPLAN + . + -''' . . f 6 g @II n 2013329 —. • u CEICOM:0 FLOOR BLALDNO PLAN A2.00, . .. • ow woe 111.101.1“....,„,_.31 aroPO( be,�rn • H rbm.11 11.340 PM PORITPURPYI • ,'.."1 . aa jmf �:) .• ç1 ., 'r...tl`S�,)�5.t. t — ....•, ..i1)1 '� j. �(1)��) C`4i:J : • J- � ,i� it r , _/ 1 I I I I I _ '. I , " I I U L a a: y :� I 1 /f� [i7 rr t �, t,.,/ , '� �,o r �� Mm,.l c[ I�a� . lo r •.. 1 / ' �/ 1, �'f.l.'� ^1/ r'�IT .,4G _ r.a.Jrcy Mt • I[I i i,,......,,,......... 1 1....,.. ... , '1 r i�ii AIAF�IA&4Y .11.11.iii ' , L _ — =f� laaN- ` , ,a,aar , rararr aPVT -�.I F ., I__ J Mr. del G ,start / ; re�1. r PLOP I F :WPC 1.; ..I..--1• un,v ornn wu „ne,OHO wu uaao o*XI aelcM a•rcwr 111•"'� I21hi _i� rr-� l.. W 1. (r,- cR1•,-rt'a-ra-•y :, . :� r -, ,•r.,•cr.,• ',r4.1t • -,•. • - � ' ;. ;l. .\I r;Ar� a., +e�1•a•,'r'1'.r. •rt.,•, � y� ,.... I j" 1]kit ,,.•. � . w. } k'a�n 1 , ��i I �' " 7;in 1 +— `tt M.,�i kg I(al n, �n a Ifi u�-- w}new�Yeerorr aaraarr -, .ri. 1 I }I ., a Dfl/WY B6K*t R wr♦ �I \\\-,.,n_ ' rwean I 04caR I I 1 wr.eam n n r ,+aeon Y f1cw. II ,.nwr14 1� ,tf= wrujr..•C .J., ,�.L .. Ifir=-- -r.a-, .�• . _ - - _r-r i — —r.e• • � �. ; 1 l;��'"n,r•y.) ') r\ 641,44. , .q. 9 $ u n • li • ..__ �� 1 '1. .._ , .o bi -2--. } Y • [Ali rli[ilii] 1 V : s ,. 1 , III' it _. 1.. ._ r _. . :-� _._ secoro FLOOR PLAN ®r SCCoM noon DULDN0 PLAN — ®" PM( 7,11.7.I I V , 00 1717 Y007tY A2.01 • • EIJOPOULCO All) Lt....,...,,,,,,.....,=_I • • El A13130CIAIEG,INC. Arctibacts.namsrs end Delman 113 5.1.27.0011 11.2 ail 21.ill. AS.AN 1 WI /12.42 212.•• 1 . iC0.111KORIC•1 I 11 • \I .1 -71 1iIIjni --. 6.:*/4 1..,,II/.;..I-c_-.IS.,1:_I4.-,l.iiS.Ly'-r.'V...,_1.-"1.11Ir,i-11.,14•1:j_1.15,lN.t 11 01-.,A 2i1.-.O1 41-s.f /LrY.C).y11.1 \],r_.,.11,./'',,-,;,.I1,•:,L-.i•l-rv...__:._.'._._'f''.e-tlj-(,k.)r"L'-'.A.(r.1.j"".„--. __r:f.r-.,..-'' '4_e.th.ia thm.si,ias r;e.iirt,i‘tdgeorrox m,...o.cin ev'''7-_-'1..,..Z.-)—.-a.-7-c1c/rr a Ysu•-l\,•_" -._I,.,;.,;' J-__.:izl_• ____________________I15\....-. _e_r_urr_h\.---_f'i rS•,e I1' 1[ ii.4ii i1 ii t er. 1 „‘..--_.,'.[.-..ffl•1.....„:..„.I,. el=_..'.k,,Ilftj...),),,m_r;u„'pI...-of1 t,.._-v..o_I'-.1.-M c.=•._..u,.y\.-I,'.1--0•,....,7...!.... ..-.. I ± ? , y, . riie3( . 1, I r i _ in , - . . ,0 IL1I,111rI1 .. t0 ,-1 MfliaA.CR1 nINntA BAY ..• • reililrto-A., _ 1 — ) '""1k l ,ki) i 1 ,..1)u• Lome WAY LW.flO GT, • I ( ''' 'i (- I 1) : ;. CeLFIAY BEACH,FL \,,,) 0 , CI WO' ,Ll.• • 1 ,„. ) I Cr li. • ..------'-'.I....''''--------------- '-•0.' .1_• 4,±.11',;•• _.•_ .... 4.-....-. •_..• _A., ..-,,•, 1 1 . nwunNs r e u 0 .. --. 320A202 1,.•4,101 TIE 11111:113 r li 1. R.00R PLAN • @ THRD R.00F1%/LIMO PLAN 034 N '"MI 00 I 7 Ilcalo r••• ''''•'••••• 200329 3 --------.--a - (.....4.1 AV.. A2.02 . . • ci B.IOPOU_O9 AND — —.. -.11r,4•_-- T••• . .-- . — . I . ARTT WALL s e e, 415 -- — __ f — ASSOCW r 0,A�sl F Y� . 4� F ...— _.. M-T• ' '. '•l fi rwt.f•e""�--__—_.- -. .. {-!'.e 1'.1—. 1.' —!'.1__._. ,1'_ 1r" } \\. ';wa „ T e Br O111ERS• ..—___ _ ... 1 .I / O I Il 11 ��.i. - �� , - \ w. J>.0 6yA1 1. - ... r Of O 1 noi— i v IIII ton ,u,,:. SRA : 1 44 ism. 1,(.., -_M1 �-e IWD RR d _.. x -..-- I o A -. c C ) IAa MOP 1 T e I.._.•a•... 1 A 1_ �� rl Aerie .1 IJ 1 ... C':1__ .. /'m-- r /' _.]-,.__i-e'e } 1_.!/' Y./•-._. ... • I1 1 KITLNEN. l C lb r. • ', •uurim,D 11'• 'O I _ 9m, k .NIIIrnIImnrntmpp114 [, NIuouump1uD111pI11 _4 _ I _ 1 O J1-3 bR �S 1--- � GREAT 2001 � • n,gefv., 13.,\I 1 \ iv iDami Du01 r . ( O •❑ r. L) tt ,r..•� ! . e _ __ �e.n,g tv_i EAT �� ' ;-1 �� ffI Hb _ • • r [ 1 1, ARINB 7.1 HSES 1 ♦•A•Ly ❑ 13 _. _ _ ... LANAI _ 1 (.1• �, . to pIIIWItlJ Ipp11111191 puIIDID11m _ —_ 1mN1p11111p1 ., _ t ►I • ara ti ® S nO • r.`' Mo'. .. _.._.__—DPI'.__..- -._... /r•_-�..__—s-T___._.._ ._kr—__ _ rd•...__._ ...I r__ ('y" .. .__D-•—.__.—__�-0—..... ram•.. y} W..'. —___f. _._ _r.._.— iFie`1 MAfr'E WAY 8E 717J HT • l ------- DELRAY BEACH.FL I jICKRALLCOLD.. .1 1ST FLOOR AREA: 1311 SF. S :NO FLOOR AREA. 1,411 01. UST FLOOR AREA: 131E Sr. • pi TOTAL(111DER AIR)AREA. 734E OF. PARTY WALL 211D FLOOR AREA: 1,411 SF. TOTAL(UNDER ROOF)AREA: 7p0S Sr. TOTAL(1110ER AIR)AREA- 23.31 OF._ I1IT t UXT J TOTAL UNDER ROOF)AREA. 2,1,1 Sr. N PFELI INAFTY 8ET •f .� 2.t1T011Y DUPLEX I I 2•ETOIIY 0K1X -- ----- 1ST FLOOR PLAN - DUPLEX WALL LEGEND i; FLOOR PLAN NOTES: SCALE:1/I••T-0. I-) �M —.. • ti Et unx� r:H crA u,. Es n I•i.r.d,KRttw u,.NOcv MAY r�•'.x 1. s.-r.n WALL ARTITION NO 30 OA f11A20,r.4241 Y,x,n1¢D.w rm L.cr.Dx+ee a DI4sbH.s [r' PO.1,DOM Mt!IruL • yy� ®:'A,.un CA04016 rx.nxna. �l iw�I,H .....D'.00..CA,b., E'�t c. ,.n x� ®x rOr..,.,b. [J,'.r u/M,PIN.. �",`W'DM.,.�'D MO�,�.•., 1ST a..00t1 PLANS y, 101 Watt, Li.]i1xw,11r T'AM Mi v."f ''mac` UMJ. 4 UMn Ixro R:wuewA ❑��: . ar' .. ^1'..J,.tGx •Rcl: 5N U_) ' L. LJ°,w.1 ❑D. I ,-..a.,7 io c' rrIl lJ/ J CM'Rf MOCK xuLL D 1�Mai as t4Nb EP.,.,1� E n ..............l,.T.„ ° =; b '.1LIS.at OVALS, ;:ti n. x ❑� ❑ nc'ext r/tr- O,M ❑I • ❑ CRCNAL, „ll.L, D.r�-oe.L. °i LOU (1 � K°•a a ^neLe.�i,."[ .�,.Wao.::"b 1.40.01/O DOER OAr;nD .LDS 4 ®.�,,....v.,...,..L»b L��.�,".:.« L.L, ---•�;'�' w e iN iKt erwCxJ OM 9.I I.O0 I wm s, t 1J° L•I i :=4,7:i!°N,`'""'-0„ Or ,727 LOL ID Ma!/w'" ,u"---° (�� • r.'s uAur, JY 11 ®L+A,cwr t�T >.e anmeDn,.xw+ncr.nlen,ra, O� r, ERIM.0 xa:m! ,art,4LL.l,e�'.ew rater 200329 �„rex:+D 4AM NU.lR lJn rt uLo eit w.,,Def .t au�br tiM O,� r�niw;Lc.an `r ®u'Iwr.u.Dist 00L Ui° D 0 re D crown.N.V.. • �ex+ u,K i.ec.,I. �..Lr.K,.L Hrrt l.r Wx•wO,!„/bIL o..--..b En1.10AAt.,, — ��IxnxmM.,, n„AND.atr., p1.41./.04K..,.s,rb ono born C7r...,.rt„a...,w nL... I....RDPAR„L.LL.,r. A2.04 • P e. ou oe Y is ,e I ' }j SPA- WALL , I 8 , 1 �p�yy� ABSOCuATEB,I l r�..�..s, rM .• .1'..'. •-. .On._.:'..-):K_.' —L.L _ )C If AII' I.t• .).C.. Lr_ t'P. tL-._ d•. ". P.� ... -_._.O _.,-'__.el� -11�._��1'_.._--.. R. 1.�� /.�.. 11�-L'�O� li.I�} _..._.__.._+.0+... ♦O�_--__ �O ♦ ._1.�__{ GM.R.r.M ... .. ._.. '. -- DALCONT --_E -ff[oRor lm� �. �. n1111�Y1�11iY11 on SO-r ' • Z -- - --- tUl� nn, -.::�_ Ilwl 4 • Lc9 77n 71 _:11'. - Y\ Y�� agT�l wo.� I !, 1010 :..-4 7 � '4 p am' .f.••' 701 d Y .:1 / " �n( a� __..__.I t,7)�, yflp k,') p j\0 \ II' — �I}-.ft J -':' Lr+- 1 • ,l ~1 a I * ._. 1> ' ..n.... a.. _ Il t. :� _ OF LI' --- ,0 n 1 t: .q .N�) '✓^ HA/k DEDRti7Gi '- co7D)'Jl V Ie ;•\ ❑�7 u v r.M ..• r �,r.••.}• —Di6oa LLCM 0 16/•I a • �1 II �J I t. / �7091I '�ftiFP wdvaJ I vn,• t ...lf.47.- .. �/ ,., .© ,,0 .. M.cr '� a }fL1 �. , '•u-';.��ar TT -, TC1 ; _ 4 xvrtocn 3 Cn]' 110 e uIn' > f7•� ,' Ali _,(�� /''Y•�' Y 0 ), (: J •I `i i YIA9TER BecROH L' - WA111n11w1111I1Y1n --. -:.gW%NYI®WW®�-G' I• u�a r,m.<cr not Y • q wIc y ...._r•• -;_r k--• '� / O o ___ 4 uq Q{' n.l 1-0 —- oa aNr ! MARINA BAY i ._.... I7ee-II ,�' ��i 7 , r ., FATE�❑ I J� I uofwi and Inl '�O 4. -i — TOWNHOW • 0. • !! '''N ' y i li - F, G U n ��'� LJ� -,)® O ❑-�71� _ l O7r.e• -a® 7 ,.` r,V -- i, re _ - - _.. SYIYOY-=� -- a" "'T'Tf!?' :_=FF't � -'1111 Innllnn�.-_ - 11 nl rl II 11 ... i ,O I. !,r I O I" �O __..�•__ }O..} .. .T 1 w'•Vi a r _� C'-r.� 1...•1•. Ir' .-Ll_- L � C�•___ • • ._. ..1. r l' )Q I 1'.L'__.I).a_FF )s— )r —u_ )s I¢_ --)I W:.. �.,I� J P �_- _- .. _ .._.__ V.C- _. _.____.._._ .... -. _11•____ _ __ V 1 ..._ ._._-- ILL__ __-. 4i MIN r — ra.N,aL auto./ S PARrr WALL 2ND FLOOR AREA, I.41I 6e. 2ND FLOOR AREA, 1,411 9F. MATfE WAY BE QDELRAY BEACH,1 TOTAL CINDER AIR) AREA. 2,te4 6P. TOTAL(UNDER WOO)AREA. 2,131 9P. '-' TOTAL BINDER ROOF)AREA, 7,14e EF. UNIT I UST U TOTAL(Iw1DER ROOF)AREd, 2,191 9F. N ')•^�"+ ti g E-STO!Y DUPLEX II a-.TORY DUPLEX C.,...- D .rn:<.., • r, 2ND FLOOR PLAN - DUPLEX tt SCALE.UVa r-o• OMIT I _i I'! 8 WALL LEGEND 8 FLOOR PLAN NOTES: - (S -0 a enxnw rAntiTICN)4•,n OA. .. 'Cj ..van , ruaraw E W• ��w'• r „: ;�;��.� a, ®,• W� ONTO..nD.W!.'uTPbl OVAL I.W.V. 1 E i,a„ULoaw c•oner.Ke.Cann. 0 R[t0CC rt�Kp.cAa,a, ®IMO,n„n ,a•.,tw,e o•' CCMDan,a,TC[L(t1R 114A204 a l'�•11 't E •4+.ur otn+w cR+vatt.ean.rJw,e ua w,u-nl c)Con In O i.2.—r m re'cr"glIft."ww Q wt:4;k Q an Top MtRAT on ❑^;m...r`""a uu �;�•tUO.n.o.-r.n,Et, DUPLEX Eowan 0 t'n OT tH e.en woo. 0 "n""" r.i,•A'AVAVe,rota A 0 ••i�uo"" �J•ronlu r -.%.cocnen etoae watt ❑r^1 rra,.oµ,•me'ra xro.Re nu,n.n Pow''°etc•' a „ant .tut ar w r T.FOIL LUL•)1•o.c 2ND.FLOOR ®Mwl run •N0•a'L,,,d aAn. E nom R.II N NayA,IRI OINEry PLAN E nAnn CIO., u v r •KaeNLY''"M1win E w4L WI tart..., .:.'Maor4.NCCO rM W col t)Kta MWI�N'N.mA0 Al.rN EXTERIOt Teen e,w,:nrAL/ p pi pal Ntc w,o,t.c..u- 2�a••.., w•w nIlia1014.1.00 mmrwa•maN,vo, ❑.l u.a.r•e•.rtra.n ra.ytn Er.,rw twrwinuu '��,JJ ®• ❑!Mr E LAI.W.oR.M," ®nxl Iv,,tart. N vwn V e'.C•L'�2 OLCOC YaI.L W a+oota.rYfl rH lKe.iRKrJ ''[ V4wI y...4 ,a to a ii w.Im a<.vs. ,n,'a w,iotNAv rawcp0��" ❑d sxt-N w,ar• ),moon cournn 9.I I.00 I l ®uwron n v �ua,e..tw. t ❑a1ieaa'a,,,,I ") eo.aenwmx Ton tar. ❑ aen,O L nnRWt EfROVIv 325 2 u❑innRo a.u•ana ❑ eenw.ctc r.0 Onnat X ❑a,u°N ei:tai,4 Qr4,v•u•wac a 1.7,rrucoo�on occo� rze,.uaA 2rA325 o1 )I MOYW..a•�•,..i.,t t 1•0Cx• ❑C ...,nu.von n.•J FOGS MO Col WEL O Atoa w.+.c1e FIC1..uH wn Moon 1 M .NOUN ., �,<,et 2 t4No,.T.CC, » LA„on,•.I....moornamaoan EK:I�g:a a rt — . . A2.05 t['I I ELIOPOULO3 AND- • L - f3 \ rtal 1. .1, a�[��n«v. u ii h!I /V` Y [ t «4">°«•,r ASSOCIATES.INC. _ - .. - - ®/ r * - -- ° x_c,.. ArcNXecte.Flamm SM x - ._ ` :[[ Designers bi OK BOOR PLAN CD" moor 44 AIL DETAIL O�FLOOR PLAN ®" SECTION /---[_i �1-`� ✓ a..�,r, ,.K ..�9°,,... z _ - o l , r Si e { [� a f , ! ti man. E'1 �.K4w1[ .I- tirar=r Nrirg,- 1-1- ..a:.'::e.:..,.�«.._,w,.•, 'I A-�� _ ��4,..., z'i ��\ lI Jd,. {o�{ a PARTIAL SIDE ELEVATON 141 r> 4 10' \..: �'iazct Yfl— N.''a[ee�' Ir-iit — � 'i'[uca' �? T__-�.-. / .....•. . COLUMN CONN.,DETAL9 M ce a r.:j F LJI _.. t ...„ --I"J \�� -LI - 'A- 6 A_A�?�,IF�3. .A.b R�i ffJl 6-A�- � . —CI . ,_.lmA 05 fi _2_: t1 ;{oJ = , rl;;tn -r Aranw —�� yrtnn b�,,;:. l f a _I I ,_�i / ___ld {E f ' --_-/ " R, S t IMONF ELEVATION 4.4 O SECTION e FROM ELEVATION O SIDE ELEVATION .__ P IIII mq f =1 rl Ar „[ [ FRONT ELEVAIM cs MARINA BAY TOWNHOUSES e rr><V 1-117- i -;;h- ill iI1JIIII1] iultni III 1 Ill` _ Ill �. � -- - 11 —+> �1 1 �� al �1 j l _� II III l Ill III II III j j 4 I II_ I II fi II_ II II ,I � I� II • v III I,�l' :: Ill N — III 111111ll Illlllll III - - ,_ Il 1. 1 Iil 11 I-a_ it II 1+ 1 II -41:_.. 1 -I /_ �•� - I it- I "II- IR -11 II it it• =11 1 __ll= II III �_ III L -1. III lllllllIlllllll flf • •rr' _ I . m uni 111ll1111 III -It_•I -_i ri 14_ n --li a. it ] I n it0 , - . -` —_--- _—_.. ---- ----- ----- --- I' 11 I 11 41 it ._I II --p_ II 11 I t+ -.-II 1,' l 1-11 I, - II III -I II _ It -ll II 111 11._ II REFLECTED CLQ PLAN ROOT FRAMING PLAN O REFLECTED CLQ PLAN ROOF FRARANG PLAN I( J(` I I I -ir 1 -1 II -II -11 1I -iI it • ❑ Ok«.....,.. O—W.r �..� Il II lii 7P ( Ili-Ill I _ I •ii it II -1t I --11 I I 5 O"°"""` I II Il II' II I II II 11 11 I II� I IAARI,AY WAY BEACE2IAST. I II- II 11 I it- -I II II 11 II 1.1 -if ttt ' DRAAY MACK Fl- • L- �f_. f -�I--' -11 - =1_ tI -!I - 11-11 " -IL_ I_,r, J� OGAZEBO'A' O GAZEBO.B. 7 I t1_: dl R=-1i _- =11=-11 II-11 = I -.-if 11-5�' . n'°'P°•"` _ II _ II -_I 7L__II _ II_- -II___II_ 11. 1 dGAZEBO KEY NOTES — — --PEAL NOTES %.11 I I- U 11 it I- 11 -II II II II -If ,"T"", 1.( CI. e.eee rt,ucvm nI.,�n,.n•.i �J{ cau.n u.cn,.�eeou..n[e.ue01-J enu e«.4'a7Nle (n l N ,an.:„`Tr. r o 1,: o E•XTERIOR .—IX%S m..wa.a— .. FRAMING PLAN M WI :I o ,[. [;1 [[„[[�[[74«.,n [1 f:',t1..nR[ uoa L ';^;r' „ .,"'x cARPORrii its • c1 [•,..., es MNnoK,u.nIo«.,..�, ce e[,�[r�[«o[n ,.,..,[o.[�.[„�kK, TREWS KEY NOTES [.[„ --- ------ . it 1411[all,C'„."°' o'P" '4:`1,".° fE . C,, �,j ., (.-`] , .,•,[.n�. ::.,,,, 11 ILL MCP,.[[... o.,«.. El cn:<n,,,e>.[ " [o.Rc,-[ `.[..,..,[." PRELMIAIIYBET -70 mC'l1II iiifITii xi CDnOF ±D4'6ti- y-n t r,-.i...n ,. 1111111! IIIIII IIII II1111Iy IIiii I I =II '{ r�.�-J r P (B)— r[,-+H''''' •[•s GAZEBO/ ie EAST PERIMETER FENCE k.. .,. [.rs.« �.r -,[.... Ts CARPORT ACY GATE S • ® v- — d ---- - -� / _ C V I1I at- $II 1 _ $ I DETAIL SHEET , r _ If6RRRIII�>elllulll1lllll[IIIII I11111Iiiiia►ss�al y�1Qfl1 _ ))I11IIIII r A D n r•r- b ,Il�-.:I P�y L a�91100{ JK ~ AN 101,11.011.uuiillilihlmlle ►i IIIIil IIII10111IIllllnllllilpilliilillulii�iul►ihl 0. .,..:;. I. .:-:,IIIR IIIlullllnlI 111111111[[llll[Illllllll} 1 1111111 1ill1 11 111 : II II III A --rr. ��„� 1 �y �°M�`[ >Illllll ill 6� t�. 1 P t��J fP� a - o 200329 OPRIVACY FENCE/GATE ®WIRY GATE .•_ c •�q� A8.05 • T-AluIlvn ,)IULA,U • 14 lo.Y.uM r.LUINN ELIOPOULOS AND . 5 L AMY IOW.COAT NM...LM MM..1041Y i AD.L MO LAM mow.MID NnM.NIT MO ACMTal TO wT•Ya1•wAM AM,MAN COAT AIM M".0 COAT IP.4,1 tWo M.WA MN L M L r•Hr." LOSAYA�W c0•i. AWITH MAN COAT MLY NMI N ATTLICATI 1O)rrWCMi.An", • NM WM NO Iwo rM W 00AI,O•MA MN M•TACL I,CYDO N AMMO DY COWL W nI A TWO(I/WAY NM/.Mamil ATIY DO IN CMr•TCM TO C..1011 NO NNC.Ier ttuwAn rm.O••]0Y t MAN TOTAL MOO.M rM•.wmw NW N.NN I. AIOD.�FDv,.T. A MM.,rm)•CA VICO IMWI '1 YneMIN COAT AMC ICH LAMA AMY Mat 00 GOAT enCCOTOI.TALL•Iw,MALrONWMOC V ..... _..._..- .. I I } �� T .� .Y.NI,OIK MOO.M1M•fw.5.6WV .MIHn r �- .TMON2*MI rIRTM.wMW N I C RN MP YMAA NORWO.MNIO4 VI DM ODOM&N mmoN Doom,.l.�MO eY-.'4 I_ l -B I ,q ® 14VALW rNWM .• Dolmen OD.'.NIA[.. Iq(�leX• • -//- D IV M1inUtO MADAM .ALL LLICCO MAMA YLLAMoMGeuTO..MNWONMA NLWYAr,I...PNWAD ovHL / '1 I'I 1 I I //n�\'r ASSOCIATES INC. YADOM Cr MN Y•m `:�-1..�..7-d-a-� �•d l--�I �I.l.. ..F- f'�-+ ram, T.,a Architect..Planners and , Y ALL rL/CTIM.DoAML NIMAL.,N ml Demon WHIAL-MMI MIMO NtR].-1Ow _.• 6rv..M••CIl.OIYI N ATL '_'10 W.MY Cr Y.MR•.POWTLA l.,wc.0 �1� .r` .trim l�edptefa NAM Nm moms MO U0•M-M )DALN•MNLIMO DeN.YYN OLWT..e CCMNS NM LN-fin,- j' L:B^ �j I f . l[O.TUN.OL RN N.M YAM. "• �rwz. •.• �,1I Ihu III('_ PANT I swag:2 ALIT.RAILNL.DI ,9 Q,`<r � ram •] •WW2 rc, ' 11 ilrrrNnwr.,• n,Nie & • Au eurAus TO Ix u.r.DrL,1 )— O. M t a n R R�\ &g; f I e. *—'ilurio r'i w'. eD rwneo,urenDouAnNrYrc1a. el- El- �de p � ti ® l�` r,w]D) n,�Y.p Stucco Sol.16.51tonsr 1r"r) :_t, t_.:0 -!.. 1 D v K,7 __ 44, `.av u D. n<.L w • • A tIGOM RMe•l0 111tlIW crRRO) -� lal xr ,w1I4... �- - Vwn.r-.'r,�.0arl • '� 5.E� 11DORD•]•SAW (HIDIDC4a) Y El-- •}--� I - ttttt •../ Nr.�. f 5.MOOTS YD.rMT. 0- 1 '1 j 3i� O jell €-- e 0 • p A.110 IWLJrtl•LP]VLM• ••w1DRM ,•• - .;e A CRC6a DAAee•&KEDO "0 1i'. r , —' I 4arv..sr...iv.Wn Q MODIQ'•]00..•O min,I.rr --" 'r ~ '' d I �h'�= f • ///I. (MDMt1GC•1LDULRD) •_ _ {1 FIOOR6•.]1Or 1W.A.•Dos NIc.onl OIarN ACM �IUJY.06AIDa0 MDei mi.t` . .LCDMO.rD.ItlyLl NN..D • n1 l El 01520 R•ILNLL0.1lr.ejlDOcuD 1 DOOM, il OI WWII ELEVATION 6 El orzco LIGHT FIXTURES 'MP1f)IC0t •]W1•La(IGHT DM001L) li O BEGA CLASSIC II 2812 • ALL a]UCOO tO ACZ6 To MCEMt O BEGA 7835 • nau1c1 Imr ` as LO•. W.BY rRAGCL PAWNSG • EE rone-PD O SHAPER LIGHTING lSoll•rcl•S1,1 MARINA BAY AcLTERNAwliexmRE,An Equal SubHltutD TOWNHOUSES FINISH,FOXY MARINE GRADE T a a 1T4D W K.Y.rR....won W • `j AL OVALD1 MW a. Ip a OIUD•rl'nDOD Y.AMW Inn! CLDNe rOaO Y./TiLI.•.rILOVDE ail:or"01..,. • ._s 1 JJJ// © nR•u.,u.o ""T t '� r.u,>a iin'mNY•rrm.NYL a ---- DrwiN iron LIM.rAMHNrIV.ID I• j I. • . MY, r..mDrmA p ={ �' 0 sY P.M M.wnn.TTr. A�/ �� A.'-r Arn -. .. ...__.-_. - . l , rw•mrm) ANf1aJE WAY 8E 1fD9 '. V�cr a l.:•[„ I� 1 �A� DELMY BEACH,FL • 1211 .W.rAN.DI rA_pEli I ;; I l a- • :: IIIiII Mil !I I I IlL.6. 3 11 'to , I ,E, �:�L- '£III �� 1 __ �._ _ _ _.l a �- B_� • l-a• .� _ =a_. 4 _ ate= I� _ — w�1�� ILL, • o- 1„•' ' ®I £L .= �q 1'dl �oF PHI ;u�® I1 ° �o�°� E ` �� ` =F ''� I 'f •Q � '121 © ��R �k ©�-e • E -- 7_..v Q,i. a__ m n.i. . _— V._� 'sr E3' 63 .. _ _ ol = _ ©. // a o—=-- e o© a I • 9—➢ ➢ ➢r © ' i4F o 3 ff'�'r' _< 1� ,'➢ ➢fie,�I� © 1-➢tom YEA ➢ ` r63 :'1 A_ 4 I IiIII!. Illaill'I 3 1 II' Ill',ill III° •-I' yClhii,Jill:111iMil IIIIiII�IIVIIM1 .II1IIII21. '- `11 .I',illl,l.11l,iil!llI'' I.I L AI!,I?ill'Iglh:.p�'IIIGidld't• Jrlr' :111:IIII!,LL!111,'C:I l'..11,,'➢ r II :,,. L _S J IIII G.W.I. I'�' II� if I,,II IL, 1• II I I" II `'�.' �N P I��II. I .till API 1i• f 1. ��:Im .,,.II,.. y� 'I Iclll II I 'O .i ',il�ll� I''l I, IIII lull III ll,lll II �� PI - �6 II,i;,l1 11,11. - .I. JI, I'_I. I d ll ,,.I „ya;,, i�'I,Iii . • r �t '[1"111J L11IIiI J.I"IIIIIIIIIIllirlJIl61 —- l'IIli 11'1,11111111 11'1 �_ IliIl 9, GIII�. III LII III il, = I I I'II�I!I�ii!illl -_ !il !II �, 11 I,,I, — ,,,,,,�,,,, y I: ,di. lu l ilr 6l i hlll i' - I:.i ,I -- rll a �� L1 uIITIIVIr.IP uplprl^Ip1011 IIIIIIIIIfIIgIlI1^nir.l'�1oIIIPPi 71111uING1g191111011pIPlllllllll� IIII(IIIIIIIp9lploIl�lll9o'I,pll -II �1 ,IldpolPUplpprli:pp'mNf'11 -- nlll',Ilsdi111 'IIIILIppIIJOI - Igglnum o,gmt•l'rl"II "I':Illn: rr111r�I,.IIv , - �:, gi IS u0011rcavM TIL!WO MD OWEN MGM. !O 61 1 rM..•urDa LD.LMarT+tD. ]79115ut r iIIY'r.Yn•T~iW-ram mm) N rem OwAa]Alw,rn rm) v I. + w eYo i Mr/ __ _ i,cca n o r:NrtoinrN•i i COO as. r�0�'iNMnD rnr) DAWN mu SOUTH + I� pCgLOM CLNAMCOINItleWLOLO!IL 1 SOV 111 WES• C -n •e.14 r;N;7Arntr wuk.e ow„rN•w. ELEVATIONS o Mfr..rAAn N.rnv m O ND.a-- fa r DYOOMAMAtrel,m. 2 WEST ELEVATION '/:, ec.I•.w•r.w. ', N„ 9.I TOO r"N 0 .a Nxwu 200329 U • A3.01 • • • 010011.1 FXIERIOR SIUCCO D[eeRlOO 1aA/L.TT l_ er m b K NO....CIO WA! - SOB ND • l" buR.',re APIR, D eT Dorn,A•rTMTcr.TTT, o-w.n.rr•b . rm.,rA. r ., e 'Ir.:7:,7"'"'":"'",='2.7".*:"'17."""'"'"CV ............ rE,.....,\ ----7'-- 1,1/_ 0,--?"-------'7. : _ .: . .. P ."""":•?...”'n:I41,1=4",7"':=4"'"`""''''''""'""'""""` '411rWrIt•. FA I..' n. �. . r °er r, �` :1�€ —1{�� - I II r R I — .Way '•.r - ^" — �- " ""." � €R scree�2R� • c r J !te t IIIIIII ;_,.. y��{}� o , �IVIII II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIgIi MP...<.De,..,e.,. ABODCNtee,I C.P PAMT LEEtN 1-1\_ I ` li S_. - — ositgrars 1Mnr§end F. • ALL ewanOee TO e£CI.r44 • -_ltl�.__. (3\ — L#1 /a �( I .rur..o rn..UNTIED AD ITR D.W.MTe HWRE... IJv, J \ Un vINO Anr�O once/NlJrrERS . .— — \I'llltlQ� _ O !"!"1� I I� _ III I� IIIIII •.,ee1 v.•inn.MOOR/ae,e.rn nRiMi erxrn, r l , v,... I.", EJ e'.Wr rope i:o11 e0 ODOISCuv EL, \ J rizl Et P-11•.' __ ra, I; A.e.04ATTFERDO WO.roc/ DUPLEX/SOUTN ELEVATION �( ry l••�l ACC[NT ntNnIY..La1vtr,r ® •Tcr�ewr, � ' { CROSS PARS•aAIrt," O.HCVRr•1Cfe..O (14IDRANSF41LcuE.) _ EU ACCrNr TW IDINT..el•111£RA W K'w I.'YI. 01 D.MOCK£•D. ONl...ITA.IC•n•nn. '; Q GALVALUUt:,4L e^.r'T n.un.br�n+ rrm, e • r Vi'CN M C •1021. MWa'...Ai AS •e r— r—. . .\I•. .._-.__..- •r/� e 9 eewnO fLKan DMCD�U o h —... ----••- .. --'�- �fF Svr—F'] rFr,•,9 RAILTIGS.COLU A,TOOW9 a DOORS rY•uAMTr rbODE•1n1. b•A....,oM.w eR..aar.L.UI . IlB e n' .seywen r li • ALL A100-001(flACE5 TO RECEIVE --_, --- �' PxeaeL FARM nT i`RAC,eL RA•tieY. —T \ f `..V{' ✓lil�uR _b�` r�ux u..n n•w ` � !LI in �� 1 ' 1 1� ;. n M u i l ��' " (—� IIIIIIII�I will I �11p)II II Vl InI It �� o�I ;�• •1 h �� x...b.., MARINA BAY '0 I I i 01l 11 3 —lit_ TOWNHOUSES •''�Y "'`° m 'll 111 II I I , !1I _- IIII IIIIIIIIII'-A '' „m ti • o u » e • �l 1 u • I. r Q DUPLEX/NORTN ELEVATION • 6 ii_17:1, 111 •OC .. �; °BRACKET CET. MD ,4rN 14 ..44 v'inw,e...ITwDV....R n'.•WIRT r i�•e r., • v lroLH.-.1.e.•Ee,: ,,.5v..��}— II- aro'u.R¢000 ai°nRrt.-moRD rm.+oc `r''"�"""'x'a a` ^^ICALIT'D� cb n.°:'.ewl.r.r:a.or.m., • IANiE WAY BE 2ND BT' i Z \_dam•. u DITA.RD Aw/on eamzle EA.+ R /� uocaurirc CAAAR W..— r• .L D�MY BEACH FL. y v Crc AM.-r•.Trt An A-1.0e- IT •r-/ ••,e a_ ,.,UrU•[M,DMA. 1•LL1G0 bU12wn.rNAO£ y M.. erv,.mxn+u r I �— WALT.I orow d4a[1e RAC. eT P...,NC1G2c,.rrr. �/ i.01A1 eu.vo:.W AR.rrlTMu.eo �t--- •L. —_4{?I'. .S�lre iij O DETAIL NIA .a//del !RI!I!!!he._ -------. ..----'� °;!a°°s.u e.°OFR,A. A .�rR � m „NI ' yaxacun wY El n..••,..r.•,Wwe.. ..oReer N.I. rnN..•.oerwe,,..ero L7It, T .. "r,w enm„ce.R orc...,.�1� --\ . = s, wwr•••A•FT rrn..___Anals.r.rtmei en.neon 'p IA � ....1.110. :I . I.AL•roK N.atN UTn ` �� yL•rre:90,7 aenrtal rgt-r �nrrro 0 Il_1 — I l • . 'r— ,.:, nkeo rww I' wdµ: ';.°r x�; fill l w ;�I m ` _ u— t'N"T�`r. 1 l Cl 'ti •A I�a II 1 MILE(riEVA710N I• • _C� o L71/I_ lifl!j DUPLEX/WEST ELEVATION I•' E. •\ vaxrun.y_ �� Sii I_ ecuA.1•.re Nnr....- u.M"'"".b., r, c GATE DETAIL ©i DUPLEX/EAST ELEVATION —"`— I n,. III 329A002 • ft r,,. ..� ICID...,a MI t • .ImTADA.i --. iI .-�_ , .- .� 0CA rt • _-,�II,tm - ~pro 0. •.vron• I i' I I r"M..ao WO.s'"' ow.Rn 1 I r .•.,•. a_f •�Its 1 _-� -A -AGOIORrzVW i nMiriK rAU IWK d�9.11.(10 �I ( . �'I ( Ir'1 Fe rw.. 700329 • pp PRIVACY'WALL DETAIL Q PRIVACY WALLA GATE ELEVATION-WEST SIDE ALONG SE.lth AVE. e,,, ...DR,,,,a...DR • i Si-- .-.,e•w.�. .-..•., rr A3.02 .... OCT-04—'88 WED 15:33 I D:LOVE MRl IREEMENT CORP TEL NO:914 428-2145 #085 P02 '+- 4 ("Cove aealfg ar Weal* ., fif sosrjs October 4, 2000 City of Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 NW 1'Avenue Delray Beach,FL 33444 Re: Approval''Marina Bay Townhomes"i 124 Marine Way,Delray Beach, FL To Whom it May Concern: I am writing to register my full support for the proposed project `Marina Bay" to be located at 124 Marine Way in Delray Beach. I purchased my first property in the Historic Marina District (824 East Atlantic Avenue) in 1978 and currently own the real estate on Atlantic Avenue from Busch's Seafood all the way to SE 7th Avenue. In addition to these commercial properties, I also own residences at 29 Palm Square, 30 Marine Way and 2 units at 60 Marine Way. As the largest property owner in the Historic Marina. District, it is my opinion that the project would be beneficial to the area with a positive impact on the area's appearance and property value. In concept and design the project is harmonious to the surrounding area and adds to the overall integrity of the historic architecture and charm of the Marina area, uhcere Burton Manrieisman Mika S;)0 a`� � .s! c2-hD9 TI'oNes 05/cNa10. in vsL. 7-dh A-v& (6courns idz_N* 6f 2.04 a0, Subdi vis i m Lf d3)o e4- lab 11 RE.ct ivL'd, No-bez Nvd. ikflAnvs �o ati*Ri Wi-LA ikcit AM( crP 022-R_V �A Ch P 8)16 . 4 Zo dad hAVP -t o IIo k1A3 GRG9A(Ror'ig -41L fnA RiAJA e y d day 10 whleh cu, )l RE R AND r o u-- SO Cc& N u AJ D A Rff O ; 1 d2)Aifos iN �ep 4/44- n 5 „ br 1i Co -Po+ p vA9 WALL sU o u�D C%_ 1L ' e v&t o �iu-t � A e 4-uu-)l y b� moo/eau -PE.bU a , T. 2 uEL - -1- Al AR-r-S Ala]) J) o u-Th 4 eAsf l o(?�62—( be_ cc WALL , wou 1d. lika -La- Wood . Wi-OLAIL Oak/E 1 eR ke ASa i Ll z � ChR i N -tE6v Ohl CURRY ou-L-)y ReC6es ) ME. fc\R -_ tok&RE 1� ��A i z.- will ha yli4ecd , apes -to be_ }1 I a 3&y dk6iLe± - tdhe0., ruseu U)OPkegs �ic A whe-R Lw)I *A ha )6eA Fd , ( wou.loL htya ( ,E. `Yth Ave. fees ouo2 r N'otka Alm 1)6,r, t) t da �vcf h A-1'a 4o a& OR__ Spy Z L p f0 1 e3 ( e_n) X "AJ alLi pgc_14 v ION Fill) y R )�� :� ' t� ,R.eA 'C e �c�T'4 GIJ f) L 11 L L (k)h)01 6)RDER Yl\ Oj2 R L 4 , , , AND I n )4A l`S whiclti (QCJJJ2 (i3 JAM O ) A iR6R3L lNKir,N) gR'i PLANS , THE PLASTRIDGE AGENCY, INC. P.O. Drawer 730 Thomas E. Lynch, C.P.C.U. 820 North Federal Highway Michael Bottcher, C.P.C.U. • Delray Beach, Florida 33447-0730 Michael Oberlander : 9 Est.1919 Richard A. Hopkins, CLU • Delray: (561) 276 5221 Donna Duven, CIC "Serves you best" 1-800-290-1143 Life, Health, Financial Fax (561) 276-5244 Services Department Website: www.Plastridge.com (561) 395-1433 October 1, 2000 City of Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 NW 1st Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 Re: Approval/"Marina Bay Townhomes"/ 124 Marine Way, Delray Beach, FL To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to register my full support for the proposed project "Marina Bay" to be located at 124 Marine Way in Delray Beach. As the property owner of 45 and 49 SE 7th Avenue in the Historic District, it is my opinion that the project would be beneficial to the area with a positive impact on the area's appearance and property value. In concept and design the project is harmonious to the surrounding area and adds to the overall integrity of the historic architecture and charm of the Marina area. v- rely, Tom Lynch `Y INSURANCE AGENTS and CONSULTANTS SINCE 1919 Boca Raton Office: 2100 N. Dixie Highway, Boca Raton,Florida 33431 • (561)395-1433 Intlepentle�t Coral Springs Office: 9660 West Sample Road, Suite 103, Coral Springs,Florida 33065 • (954)752-8230 I (.......insurance Palm Beach Gardens Offce:8895 N.Military Trail,Suite 303,Bldg.B,Palm Beach Gardens,Florida 33410 •(561)630-4955 AQEIII. Stuart Office: 811 S.E. Ocean Boulevard, Stuart, Florida 34994-2427 • (561)287-5532 OCT-05-2000 03 :27 AM P. 01 PROGRESSIVE RESIDENTS OF DELRAY Post Offios Box 1301 Delray Betel%Florida 33447 October 3, .2000 }Iodise 5614N-9400 Chairman Tony Keller and Members Historic Preservation Board Delray Beach,Florida Dear Chairman Keller and Members of the Board: Just since last April,you have had six demolition requests for historic structures which are in designated historic districts in Delray Beach—five others have come in for small-scale noncontributing buildings which fire going to be replaced by larger ones within historic districts. As one of the largest homeowners' associations in Delray Beach,we are very concerned about this and feel that at this rate the integrity of our historic ordinance and our comprehensive plan are in jeopardy. Not only does PROD oppose the destruction of any contributing sites within historic districts,we feel it even more critical that someone take a look at the big picture here. We arc a built-out town,and redevelopment is going on largely within historic districts or beachfront areas which capture the true essence of what we are—a village by the sea. We are at a crucial point now,where saving contributing sites should be part of the planning process—it's too late to wait until it reaches thc lIPB. Regarding the Marina Bay Project(on this week's agenda),we feel planners and developers have made some very positive steps in incorporating this into the small-sealed historic district,where just to the south and north sit landmark Sam Ogren and John Volk designs.But let's not forget that this project requires the destruction of four smaller buildings with replacement by one huge one. Also, one of these four that the developers are asking to demolish is a clapboard cottage from 1937 which should be saved on or near the site. Also,the developers are asking for setback variances on three sides of thc project. PROD has reviewed the plans and feels the variances on the north and south side should not be granted,although the ones on the cast side of the project are warranted. The other demolitions on this week's HPB agenda concern the Neal Farms Market property. Who in Delray Beach does not have Neal's as part of their collective consciousness of the village by the sea?That is what historic preservation is about--saving the landmarks of our history as a town,a village,and a people. The bulldozer needs to be used selectively on this project as well. The collage here(formerly Jo's Back Room)is even more historic than the others,having been built in 1926! We urge the Historic Preservation Board Members to make the saving of important pieces of our village part of the planning process whenever possible.We feel the two historic cottages—one on the Marina Bay project and one on the Neal's project—should without question be saved. Sincerely. P -Ct44- 8(212`.L' Jean Beer,President HISTORIC PRESERI/ATION BOARD STAT' REPORT Project Name: COA-260 Continuation, The Colony Hotel, Jestena Boughton, Owner, Paul Gagnon or Mike Savage, Authorized Agents. Project Location: 525 E. Atlantic Avenue ITEM BEFOQRE` .THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval for window replacements on the east facade and a new door to be installed on the south elevation at the southeast corner of the building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND The Colony Hotel was constructed in 1925 in the Mission Revival style. It was designed by prominent Miami architect Martin Luther Hampton. Originally known as the Alterep, the hotel was purchased by the Boughton family in 1935 and the name was changed to the Colony Hotel. DESCRIPTION 1 ANALYSIS Prior to the widening of NE 6th Avenue the hotel had an entrance on the east façade. Originally, the southern portion of the east façade consisted of a series of 3 full-length arched openings on both sides of the entrance door, which had a matching arch. After the widening of NE 6th Avenue the windows and doors were removed and the lower portion of the arches was infilled and stuccoed to match the building. A stucco sill was added and faux windows were installed above the infill. These are existing and consist of wood frames attached to a plywood backing. The arch on the southeast corner of the front elevation was infilled with plywood and painted white. The top of the arches and their original sills remain intact. On the east elevation the applicant proposes to reopen the arches from the original sills to the curve of the arch and install wood Pella windows with an "Enduraclad" exterior finish in Pella's standard brown color. The windows will be fixed pane impact resistant glass with 2 operable transom windows above the fixed pane. The arch on the southeast corner of the front façade (E. Atlantic Avenue) will be reopened and a pair of mahogany French doors with impact resistant glass panes will be installed in the opening Meeting Date: October 4, 2000 Agenda Item: IV-B HPB Staff Report COA-260 Continuation3 Page 2 The awnings, which were approved for the east arches and south door in 1998, will be reinstalled when the renovation is complete. Restoring the arch openings will have a positive impact on the east façade of the building and will greatly benefit the 6th Avenue streetscape. Installation of the doors on the southeast corner will add to the aesthetics of the front façade and will enhance the prominent corner of E. Atlantic Avenue and NE 6th Avenue. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented. RECOMMENDATION Based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E) and the Design Guidelines approve the window and doors associated with COA-260 as presented. File/C0A-260-contd-colony Hote sr "w - . • •2:1, ' .1;',,,-`; , •;'....'i ;. ‘ •-...!:..,,,...•,(• .). . • ••••.,;. -1 ',' ; •1%.4i-:yso ' ' • • %':-... 4.•,. ,..,-..t,.;f ..\ t.. .....i',...N' y.. . :T.I4?.1. ., — . ,... . ... • 1..A;i1;‘,. ; ,,....,; II: _ . •`,!....!:.1 . -' 'i', ,'. • . : 0, ..,. . • .i...; ..., ..,. .., ...`,.... • • , . 1.. ;A• ;r . r ,fti t , 0 1,c---\-0`---- ----_-_—______----.. --- • - fv;i' , --------.--,--sr-,---y--„,-,,-,--y:-,f--y-v--,,-,,,--------v----,-- ' __ __ _ ,_,, I I ij ,-7-- • . -- -_- .....__-- ):: 0 1 0 . .,,,, __-— ----.. ____.__ ___. :i-- ."--- --„, 4110 I.'. ......- , -.----_, •, i'. . .... ....._.y ....- -1------.1, , . .„ i „,,,;: -;- , . z . . , , , , , \ / , --,';‘!". I \ , ; •N-•0 / ,_1_ / \ ! / 1 • 0 ( \ i ,------7r, x 1*,c..-1".:.C./\14\( '''.4'; A/4 r-i 1 r-I 6-". ..;n' AElYr.;..114(Lev u6i4ou T)--t\. •;:. 1....:; . : \ 1- I ----4------ •1 .. (. ----4- = ---,1 -- -i---. I ---- .--• .------ , . I ' ___,.---- -- I ---,-- • I -1 il 1 - 1-. -71" I-7. •,.. - -- j , ' , IlL „11 --_,I., - [,.'"-\--,t1i,'" ,1 - . - 1 ,---di[77----- -1 / '..,21 • 4',', • 1//: •.1 - . - [ ,'"\\.] Es=D-' ' -[------7 --- — - .1._____J______=,- — - --------- 1 t , .. ,...... ,,; •1 . ..,,in .C/1 1 I 1 : -4 I ::- ..: :::::.:: :._71 Psilpl ....., _.,, ....._..._._ , ro-rue,e. .1 ...._ 6pt-oc-e- .to.sts.c...... '. . • ,,,.• 't,:ivi,co 1 6 ..... - , - _ ._._._.__._.t. ve' J. _:___._ •Oyt • • i 0A.Lt 1'."'L. _ -- cW.__ . —. --=-------- . 600L- d- ,——. —.—..—,..-. •....1t.:.-'I'lI jl3Yi1 .:.1., ie. _ `- 11 1' .:ir --?— . nr.v , - Pv Ill' Fl-fL•1"1(' "e'R 70 r-i r t-,,,,it•'v./II- P-At5tvr2,.tri-r#Ie 1,--u-roz*.,t-svot.. v4/ 1,716.11-00H .', t 1 i'll. 1 . . i• 1 • .4 . • • . • . . 1 lYU trgU U41ajur [___ ---2=--,:.--"--, Ti (( ,, • . - - -ih-N * 0 I IlL I c:_:_-:------_7_71 II t — • I .— _ ... r y.rii.Rs To(-0/.'r" 1 I 2/.tiD _ o911nP �dfo(�s —.— — T r-r t. 1 / i�_. , I 1 I 1.1 L. / •• r-t 1 ice' • E6 � . --• 0K ,-fING e-iiv;w I.r.. 01,1„. t-,O. -� - 15?'G, I iimw \ :_•: � r( 4' L;ry;�IKp'-o1 1,aPAce Yv SG1»v-WFf u,v6 16Hep INe-le �frJI?E1 F1 fAYFei 1CXEEUi5 ...) —..... ... -- ... 19/\r<rit\ L_ . o U I- 1-4 5 I, </is\-r 1 c li -..( )<Ir.-i-li-1,--) I t,O.IttA.lAAIl ' ( y4,'-,•1 i 44 0.,,tti:J'4',"!.i'i h._., • :1)104 St•;,,trt4+4,41.'1 el ,..Al'Is.','•t 3 trtriN.#,t q.,-.17,..-!.;•il,tio...) cii, 0,, i . , • ,I• .. . 0.0) ••' •• • . , vie rm. 10,1,1". ., . , 1 .1 .•.1*, •',.1. . . .,.0'.-' • -ri 1 e 1, .:• ; • ., Vvv, ft.. . . "1 . i,..,1.: ,• . •, 4 i i 41 •, 1 iV7.: I 1.1......•:,,,,t I I .04*A.,44440.414,lop" , t • i. i,:..'' ';;.: Z;01:t 4•.„., . '. 1 • 0 ttyrro•eirt,meti4ettle .: .1 .1IT • : " di' ) 1. • • .• . p,,. .„ , , . . i..!4.,:. :,'''.* ,. ... . , ,., .. .,), r ,1.,,id •,* ,wi" .,:,..• to, A t., ., ,. • .. , ,• y. 1? ..i, ...44,11; . ii .., ,. .. . ,, , , ,, .„,.,, 1 4 ,..,.. tit. ..,,6 all,IMP , 41' 3>, i .t.,k4i . .•# 4 .' ' 1 I , • . I V.' • IA i 1-Tr:toe:to — -..iu • • ,ki.. , , ..N v . 1,)) 4)„.. ., .. • ta-42kt.r.w-4747 , . / . .. .:„( ,.. ki 4.'y .t 1 I :i 4.,.. r••ii.; ". ...S.:0 '. It , ,;,..,,, y,....... b.,..._, . ,, ., ,. , „ ,i. .,..s.,. ... • . ...., • . ii.,,, ,,,. , ..,,,, . ,: ..,,, ,,.,. ,,, ,,,,- .,., . • .. . , 4 .. .,,,. ,. , , .,, 1 ii, k•rz,, r' .1, I- . , ,, , 4 4, .. 1 c...., .i. ,„ . . , , , ,„, . . i 1 ,,,,,, 4 ' .„ ,... • •, ,„„. , , , • • ..• ,., . , • ,, . •••• , 1 .. • 0 , , . i.4:''''A'.. • I :''1 '-'. • . ,!, ,! s . 441 "t 1 i I i 41'14410e .ot71010:..‘1\.":1:'I''''''14.1:.'''''1.1*1' .. 11,1.!'e. 44-.,',.':: -:t ..'..7. ‘,::‘k ,., ._ 1 11 .. ,.0 ii .. .. .,.,..1,11•‘,( s, ,,4 •...•1 ': • '. ,\'''%.i.: ' .'::. I ...' . •••. • .i., . ':.. :',', JI _____________________________. . 4!IV • 1 0..!‘„. ..1.t .v„., i.t....i.tit.). 4.. .-• •••;;,1. i:•,-, '1'. ' "%.i .‘4.7.• ' n% 6 •4 Artijek?• '1, '' Z.1.1.; ::.!3',.)1 !-• '.13:7:•..;.,A, :.•'; '. .I 1.,I:. ' - •' - • ' i 1• , ' • . ,..,...-.. :....;'..•,,:,;•-•,,.:1. -;:`.1., ....,,!..--A,;•."..-.-,1.---. - , • 4 4.4-4:Aii-X47,-,7.14-----.Ts-- -yr- .70:::.-iiii.14Qi.iiiiiiignete------1.aire---;1;4144.ViNiEsu.:4;"+- . .-7.•;;:a.i47."7---5i'..10 . :;.: ......1"t1..: * .* . '. . . . . ' I . . . . ' . . ; . • HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD STAFF REPORT Amendment to the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan Presented by Ron Hoggard, Senior Planner, Redevelopment. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of making a recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board with respect to an amendment to the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan. BACKGROUND The West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Coalition and the Community Redevelopment Agency have just completed the second amendment to the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan. The amended Plan is scheduled for review by the by the Planning & Zoning Board on October 16, 2000. The Planning & Zoning Board will make a recommendation to the City Commission. Adoption of the Plan is expected in November. The amended plan contains revised Block Redevelopment Plans for all blocks within the redevelopment area, including several in the West Settlers District and the Old School Square Historic Arts District. These diagrams are only illustrations of what may be possible and are not meant show what will actually occur on the properties. They do, however, give a good indication of the current vision for redevelopment. The diagrams and descriptions for the blocks located within the aforementioned historic districts are attached for your review. ATERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Deny, with reasons stated. 2. Approve as presented. RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Planning & Zoning Board that the amended West Atlantic Redevelopment Plan be approved as presented. Meeting Date: October 4,2000 Agenda Item: V-B <f• 8 AGENDA • HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY.OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: October 18, 2000 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER IL PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS A. Variance-70 & COA-417 Marina Bay Townhomes: A Development Proposal Which Will Replace the Existing Structures Located at 135 SE 7th Avenue and 124, 132 & 136 Marine Way (Harbor House Apartments), Marina Historic District. Gary Eliopoulos, Architect and Authorized Agent. Consider Granting Variances from the Land Development Regulations Sections 4.3.4(K) and 4.6.15(G)(1) Pertaining to the Side and Front Building and Pool Setback Requirements Associated with COA-417. COA-417: Consider the Following Elements: • Demolition of All Structures Located on the Site; Including One Contributing Structure; • Site Plan; • Landscape Plan; and, • Design Elements. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA-307-Continuation: The Sandoway House Nature Center, 142 S. Ocean Boulevard, Individually Listed in the Local Register of Historic Places. Don Day — Delray Awning, Authorized Agent. Consider Installation of an Awning Over the Pool on the West Side of the Property in the Rear of the Nature Center. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff V. ADJOURN 44ib loilpid Michelle E. Hoylanc' Planner POSTED ON: OC T OBER 12, 2000 FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT AST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR I COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: Bodker, Dave MAILING ADDRESS [X]CITY [] COUNTY [] OTHER LOCAL AGENCY [] STATE 801 NW 2"d Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33444 CITY COUNTY Delray Beach Palm Beach DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY October 18, 2000 NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, City of Delray Beach OR COMMITTEE Historic Preservation Board WHO MUST FILE FORM 4 This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers,this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is prescribed for all other boards, i.e.those at the state level. =ART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed. PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.1343(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).J The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained. In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: (a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is abstaining from voting; and (b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below. NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting. In such cases, however,the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made. I,the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on October 18.2000: (a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain;or X inured to the special gain of North Atlantic Realty Corp, by whom I am retained. (b) The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Agenda Item II.A.: Variance 70 & COA 417, New Construction of Marina Bay Townhomes. I am the Landscape Architect for this project. October 18, 2000 Date Filed Signature Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART B VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom is retained is required to disclose the nature of is interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs. I,the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclosure that on , 19 (a) I voted on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retains (b) The measure on which I voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Date Filed Signature Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. this form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 11.317(1983),A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY DISCLOSURE CONSTITUT GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE ORE MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL C SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENAL 1 NOT TO EXCEED$5,000. MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 18, 2000 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Keller, Mary Lou Jamison, Gail-Lee McDermott, Shane Ames (arrived 6:05 & left 6:50), Dave Bodker, Donnamarie Sloan, Rhonda Sexton (arrived 6:05) STAFF PRESENT: Michelle Hoyland, Jeff Costello, Diana Mund, Assistant City Attorney Jay Jambeck, City Engineer Randal Krejcarek As the applicant for Item 11.A. preferred to wait until the rest of the Board arrived the Board amended the agenda to heard Item III.A. first. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 307-Continuation: The Sandoway House Nature Center, 142 S. Ocean Boulevard, Individually Listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. Carolyn Patton, Authorized Agent and Don Day, Delray Awning. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering the installation of an awning over the pool on the west side of the property in the rear of the nature center. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5 -0 to approve COA 307-Continuation as presented based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E). At this point on the agenda Mr. Ames & Ms. Sexton arrived at the meeting. At this point on the agenda Mr. Bodker stepped down from the Board. II. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: A. Variance 70 & COA 417: Marina Bay Townhomes, a Development Proposal which will Replace the Existing Structures Located at 135 SE 7th Avenue & 124, 132 & 136 Marine Way (Harbor House Apartments), Marina Historic District. Gary Eliopoulos, Architect/Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering granting variances from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) and 4.6.15(G)(1) pertaining to the side and front building and pool setback requirements. The COA consists of demolition of all structures located on the site including one contributing structure, site plan, landscape plan and design element associated with a new townhouse development. Chairman Keller stated that this was a Quasi-Judicial item. Therefore, anyone wishing to speak on this item would have to be sworn in. Board Secretary Diana Mund asked that anyone wishing to speak raise their right hand and then administered the oath. Chairman Keller declared the Public Hearing open. Mary Ellen Ashby, 335 SE 7th Avenue, spoke in support of the project. Gary & Cathy Corvino, 127 SE 7th Avenue, spoke in support of the project. Cheryl Jones, 131 SE 7th Avenue, spoke in support of the project, however she requested that the proposed privacy fence surrounding the property be a wall instead, as her property abuts the proposed development. Dan Sloan, 106 SE 7th Avenue, spoke in support of the project, but did have concerns with the proposed aluminum fence. JoAnn Peart, 107 NW 9th Street, stated that she was opposed to the demolition of the 1937 building and felt it should be incorporated into the development proposal. • Alieda Riley, 65 Palm Square, stated that she owned property in the Marina Historic District and inquired if she would be able to get the same variance for her property? She stated her opposition to the demolition of the 1937 building and felt that the developer should be required to pay to have it moved to another property within the district. Carolyn Patton, representing Progressive Residence of Delray, stated that they felt that the requested variances on the north and south sides of the property were not warranted. They are opposed to the demolition of the 1937 building and felt it should be incorporated into the project. Chairman Keller read the following letters of support: 1. Genie Rothman, 70 SE 4th Avenue; 2. Margot Watson, 220 MacFarlane Drive, #506; 3. Brian Sorge & Sean Murray, 129 SE 7th Avenue; 4. Burton Handelsman, 13759 Via Aurora; and, 5. Tom Lynch, 820 N. Federal Highway. -2- HPB Minutes 10/18/00 Chairman Keller then read the following letters of opposition: 1. Joan McGrath, 15 Tall Pines Trail, Charlestown, RI; and, 2. William Johnson representing Bar Harbour Apartments. As there was no one else wishing to speak Chairman Keller closed the Public Hearing. At this point on the agenda Mr. Ames left the meeting. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 4-1 (Sexton dissenting) to approve Variance 70 based upon positive findings with respect to 4.5.1(F)(1),to grant the variances to LDR Sections 4.3.4(K) and 4.6.15(G)(1)(a) to reduce the building setbacks as described in the staff report. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 417 for the Waiver to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), to reduce the required 5' perimeter landscape requirement to 4'6" along the west, north and south sides of the property adjacent to the internal roadway. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 417 for the Special Action to allow a parking reduction of 5 parking spaces in that a total of 36 parking spaces are available utilizing tandem parking spaces for each unit, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(c). It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 45-0 to approve COA 417 for the Internal Adjustment to allow 18'-22' rear setbacks versus the required 25', based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.4.4(0)(3)(b). It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5-1 to approve COA 417 for the Class V Site Plan, based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3, LDR Sections 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility), 4.4.6(I) (RM-Performance Standards) and 4.3.3(0) and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the duplexes have wall mounted light fixtures adjacent to the individual entrances; 2. That all site lighting be indicated on the landscape and site plans; 3. That an additional 5' of right-of-way be dedicated along SE 7th Avenue; and, 4. That the plat be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. -3- HPB Minutes 10/18/00 It was moved by Ms. McDermott, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5-0 to approve COA 417 for the Landscape Plan as presented, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 417 for the Design Elements, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.18, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a 6' high stucco wall be continued along the north and south property lines; and, 2. That the applicant return to the Board with a sample of the proposed aluminum fence. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 417 for the Demolitions, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1) for the following properties: 1. Harbor House, 124 Marine Way; 2. 136 Marine Way (Lot 12, Block 126); 3. 135 SE 7th Avenue (Lot 19, Block 126); and, 4. That 132 Marine Way be tabled until the Board's January 3, 2001 meeting, in order to give the applicant adequate time to try and save the structure. At this point on the agenda Mr. Bodker returned to the Board. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None B. Board Members None C. Staff None VII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 7:45 P.M. -4- HPB Minutes 10/18/00 The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for October 18, 2000, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on November 15, 2000. ////z/7 Diana Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -5- HPB Minutes 10/18/00 . .. t . HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: October 18, 2000 (Continued from October 4, 2000 meeting) AGENDA ITEM: II.A. ITEM: Consideration of COA-417 Which Incorporates the Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes, Located on the West Side of Marine Way, Approximately 840' South of East Atlantic Avenue N.✓ 15T ST. I GENERAL DATA: - 1 TRANS 4 ATLANTIC PARK - _ - = PLAZA Owner/Applicant North Atlantic Realty Corp. Ln `D Agent Eliopoulos & Associates, -gZ Z Inc. �7 , III ATLANTIC AVENUE Gary Eliopoulos 111 I I I 1 --- Location West side of Marine Way, _ - • L. l approximately 840' south of - East Atlantic Avenue. - Property Size .98 acres a - y ;' Future Land Use Map Medium Density Residential _ 'S.E. 1ST ST. 5-12 units/acre - BUDS Current Zoning RM (Multiple Family - i i .( I I r Residential-Medium - Density) im! .>- i Adjacent Zoning North: RM _ w East: CF (Community Facilities) _ r uir" ill,ion , . South: RM _ S.. _ 2ND MI ST West: RM - ( 3 ^< = Existing Land Use Six (6) separate residential rental apartment buildings _ < containing 33 residential -- =, units total. - 1 tl Wl Proposed Land Use Construction of a 2-story _`__ 3RD 5' -- and 3-story 8-unit — o townhouse building with '�EN© m pools, gazebos and -mE;_ o z gardens. Construction of a ^mN Z L�N 2-story duplex structure with ,al ; ,, _ in-ground spas and — S.C. 47H S, gardens. j j Water Service Existing on site. N Sewer Service Existing on site. �n ( �I —Immt-f—' ILA. „ ITEM ;BEFQRE T'H`E� BOARD' { The action before the Board is approval of COA-417, which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Marina Bay Townhomes (8 fee simple townhouse units and 1 duplex structure) pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F) ❑ Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; and ❑ Architectural Elevations. ❑ Demolition of contributing and noncontributing residential structures; and, ❑ Waiver to the following requirement: LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a) —A request to reduce the perimeter landscaping adjacent to the interior street system on the west side of the property from 5' to 4'6”. ❑ Variances to the following requirement: LDR Section 4.3.4(K) and 4.6.15(G)(1)(a) — A request to reduce the front and side building and pool setbacks (described in further detail in the Variance Analysis section of this report). B AaC3K G'R QU N D The subject property is located on the west side of Marine Way, approximately 226' south of SE 1st Avenue. The .98 acre site consists of Lots 8,9,10,11,12, and 19, a Subdivision of Block 126, is within the Marina Historic District and is zoned RM (Medium Density Residential). The site currently contains a multi-family development, which is located in several buildings containing a total of 33 units. The structures are to be demolished as part of this development proposal. Much of the area comprising the Marina Historic District was originally a tropical plant nursery owned by the pioneering Blank family who migrated to Delray from Michigan in 1905. Many of the beautiful trees in the district owe their beginnings to the Blank's Nursery. The beginning date for building lots platted in Block 126 was 1925, which was shortly before the Florida Land Boom ended in 1926 and virtually all new construction ceased. Therefore, with the exception of only one or two structures, the earliest buildings in the Marina Historic District date from the mid 1930s. 124 Marine Way (Harbor House): The City's records indicate the site (0.492 acres) was developed between 1951 and 1954 as a 22-unit apartment hotel with an attached manager's office/apartment. 132 Marine Way (Harbor Inn): The City's records indicate the 0.164 acre site was developed between 1937 and 1938 as a single-family residence. Sometime between 1938 and 1990 the site was converted into a six-unit apartment, and the property was cited by the Code Enforcement Division. In 1992, the building was converted back to two units. • SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Town homes. Page 2 136 Marine Way (Harbor Villas): The City's records indicate that Lot 12 (0.164 acres) was developed in 1952 with a two-story duplex and single story residence. Lot 19 (0.164 acres) was developed in 1952 as a two- story duplex. In 1957 Lots 12 and,19, Block 126 were combined, thereby creating a 0.328 acre site known as the Portofina apartments. In 1968 a second floor addition was made to the existing single story residence on Lot 12 to accommodate three rental units. There are no records or building permits indicating the legal conversion of this structure to an apartment. #. PROJECT DESCRIPT�IN The development proposal incorporates the following: ❑ Demolition of the noncontributing Harbor House apartment buildings. ❑ Construction of a 2-story and 3-story, 8-unit townhouse building with pools, gazebos and gardens. ❑ Construction of a 2-story duplex structure with in-ground spas and gardens. ❑ Construction of an internal street system. ❑ Construction of a 4-space parking area, which will serve the duplex structure. ❑ Installation of landscaping, walkways and site lighting. SITE PLA :,- NALYSIS �, ,. _„ .. ...........i..,P. ,.. ,.,,, n,. ,,. _ .... ,s..., r .. COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the RM zoning district: Standard Proposed„`. Maximum Budding Height 35' 34'3"' Minimum,Buildings Setbacks See Variance Analysis Below Minimum Floor Area ; `, Three Bedroom 1,250 sq. 2,870sq.ft.- ft. 4,610sq.ft ,Maximum-Lot Coverage 40% 35.4% Minimum-Open Space 25% 25.66% SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 3 Variance Analysis: Building Setbacks: While the townhouse structure complies with the 25' front setback for the two-story portion and 30' front setback for the three-story portion, the development proposal includes a number of variance requests from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) and LDR Section 4.6.15(G)(1)(a) to reduce the following setbacks: 135 SE 7th Avenue The front setback requirement is twenty-five feet (25'); the variances requested from the front property line are as follows from north to south: • Reduce the front setback to nine feet (9') for a distance of 6' to allow an in-ground spa to be constructed. • Reduce the front setback to twelve feet eight inches (12'8") for a distance of 22' to allow the duplex to be constructed. The north side interior setback requirement is fifteen feet (15'); the variances requested from the north property line are as follows from west to east: • Reduce the north side setback to ten feet (10') for a distance of 87' to allow the duplex to be constructed; • Reduce the north side setback to four feet (4') for a distance of 17' to allow a pergola type carport to be constructed. The south side interior setback requirement is fifteen feet (15'); the variances requested from south property line are as follows from west to east: • Reduce the south side setback to ten feet (10') for a distance of 100' to allow the duplex to be constructed; • Reduce the south side setback to eight feet (8') for a distance of 18' to allow a pergola type carport to be constructed. The side interior pool setback is ten feet (10'); the variances requested from the north and south property lines are as follows: • Reduce the north side setback to five feet (5') for a distance of 8' to allow an in-ground spa to be constructed; • Reduce the south side setback to three feet (3') for a distance of 4' to allow an in-ground spa to be constructed; 124, 132 and 136 Marine Way (Harbor House Apartments) The front setback requirement is twenty-five feet (25'); the variances requested from the front property line are as follows from north to south: • Reduce the front setback to eight feet (8') for a distance of 25' to allow a pool and gazebo to be constructed for the north townhouse unit; • Reduce the front setback to ten feet (10') for a distance of 128' to allow 6 pools and 6 gazebos to be constructed for 6 of the townhouse units; SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 4 • Reduce the front setback to eight feet (8') for a distance of 25' to allow a pool and gazebo to be constructed for the south townhouse unit. The north and south side interior setback requirement is fifteen feet (15'); the variances requested from the north and south property lines are as follows from west to east: • Reduce the side setback to ten feet (10') for a distance of 65' to allow the townhouse units to be constructed; • Reduce the side setback to zero feet (0') for a distance of 10' to allow a trellis to be constructed; • Reduce the side setback to five feet (5') to allow a gazebo to be constructed. The original project design was to provide a standard townhouse and duplex development with garage doors and parking located in the front yards. At staffs suggestion, the applicant implemented a traditional neighborhood type of design by providing garages and parking in the rear, which accommodates a more pedestrian friendly streetscape. By providing this design concept, the townhouse structure was separated in the middle to accommodate the access drive, therefore the side setbacks were reduced accordingly. With relocation of the vehicular access to the rear, the courtyards with pools, which are standard for this type of development, were relocated to the front yard. If the pools were located in the rear of the structure, a variance would not be necessary. The proposed gazebos provide more variation to the front elevations and provide a nice entry feature. With regard to the duplex structure, in order to provide a similar design as the townhouses and provide a quality for sale product on a narrow parcel, the variances are supportable. The requested variances appear to meet the required basis provided in Section 4.5.1(J), regarding the preservation of historic character and the adaptive reuse of the property (See attached Appendix C). LDR Section 4.4.6 RM Zone District: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.6 (A) Purpose and Intent: The Medium Density Residential (RM) District provides a residential zoning district with flexible densities having a base of six (6) units per acre and a maximum of twelve (12) units per acre. The actual density of a particular RM development is based upon its ability to achieve certain performance standards which are intended to mitigate the impacts of the increased density and ensure that the project is compatible with surrounding land uses. Further, the Medium Density Residential District provides for implementation of those objectives and policies contained within the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan which call for accommodating a variety of housing types. LDR Section 4.4.6(1) Performance Standards: 1) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.6(I)(1) These standards shall apply to all site plans approved subsequent to October 7, 1997, and for modifications to existing developments which involve the creation of additional residential units. In order to increase a project density beyond six (6) units per acre, the approving body must make a finding that the development substantially complies with the SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 5 performance standards listed in this section. The intent of the standards is to mitigate the impacts of the additional density both internal and external to the site. The extent to which a project meets the standards will determine the number of units per acre that will be permitted. For example, if a project meets or exceeds all of the standards, and is otherwise consistent with applicable standards and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations, the maximum density is permitted. Projects which only partially achieve these standards will be permitted a correspondingly lower density. 2) In addition to the above, LDR Section 4.4.6(1)(2), it is acknowledged that some of the above referenced standards may not be entirely applicable to small, infill type residential projects. For those types of projects, the ultimate density should be based upon the attainment of those standards, which are applicable, as well as the development's ability to meet or exceed other minimum code requirements. The performance standards are as follows: (a) The traffic circulation system is designed to control speed and reduce volumes on the interior and exterior street network. This can be accomplished through the use of traffic calming devices;street networks consisting of loops and short segments; multiple entrances and exits into the development; and similar measures that are intended to minimize through traffic and keep speeds within the development at or below 20 m.p.h. The proposal is an infill development, which reduces the overall number of units on the property from 33 units to 10 units (8 townhouse units and 2 duplex units). This standard would not be applicable if each unit had a driveway to the adjacent public right-of-way (Marine Way and SE 7th Avenue). However, the only vehicular access is the proposed interior street system, which is accesses the rear of the townhouse units. The access road acts more as an alley and has short segments with a gated entry. Thus, this standard has been met. _ (b) Buildings are placed throughout the development in a manner that reduces the overall massing, and provides a feeling of open space. The proposal involves the installation of one 8-unit townhouse building and one 2-unit duplex building. The 8-unit townhouse building is 228' wide and the duplex building is 40' wide. The elevations have varying setbacks and roof lines, which helps to break up the massing. Also, the end townhouse units are two-story while the interior townhouse units are three-story, which reduces the overall massing from the adjacent properties to the north and south. Thus, this performance standard has been met. (c) Where immediately adjacent to residential zoning districts having a lower density, building setbacks and landscape materials along those adjacent property lines are increased beyond the required minimums in order to provide a meaningful buffer to those lower density areas. Building setbacks are increased by at least 25% of the required minimum; at least one tree per 30 linear feet (or fraction thereof) is provided; trees exceed the required height at time of planting • SPRAB Staff Report • Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 6 by 25% or more; and a hedge, wall or fence is provided as a visual buffer between the properties. While this standard is not applicable as the surrounding residential zoning is the same as the subject property (RM) and ,has the same density range, the following analysis has been provided. Variances have been requested to the side interior building setbacks as well as the front setback to accommodate one-story gazebos. However, the townhouse building complies with the front setback and exceeds the setbacks from the properties to the west (47'-51'). The landscape code has been exceeded and extra measures have been taken to enhance the landscaping throughout the site in that a good variety of plant materials is being proposed. Additionally, the units offer a mix of garden areas, pools or spas, gazebos and walls between properties. (d) The development offers a varied streetscape and building design. For example, setbacks are staggered and offset, with varying roof heights (for multi- family buildings, the planes of the facades are offset to add interest and distinguish individual units). Building elevations incorporate diversity in window and door shapes and locations; features such as balconies, arches, porches, courtyards; and design elements such as shutters, window mullions, quoins, decorative tiles, etc. The building contains a number of architectural features such as raised stucco banding, decorative rafter tails and support brackets, cedar wood shutters, decorative chimneys, a decorative cupola, balconies with metal railings and variations in window treatments. The buildings also have varying roof heights, as well as staggered and offset building setbacks. These elements provide for a varied streetscape and building design. Therefore, the development meets and exceeds this requirement. (e) A number of different unit types, sizes and floor plans are available within the development in order to accommodate households of various ages and sizes. Multi-family housing will at a minimum have a mix of one, two and three bedroom units with varying floor plans. Single family housing (attached and detached) will at a minimum offer a mix of three and four bedroom units with varying floor plans. The development consists of 8 fee-simple (single family attached) units and one 2-unit condominiumized duplex. All of the units contain 3 bedrooms each with varying floor plans. Based upon the above, this performance standard has been met. (t) The development is designed to preserve and enhance existing natural areas and/or water bodies. Where no such areas exist, new areas, which provide open space and native habitat, are created and incorporated into the project. The site has been disturbed and thus, no natural areas exist on site to be preserved. However, a multitude of existing landscaping which exists on site is to be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan. While this performance standard has not been met, typically an infill development of this size (0.98 acres) would not provide a native habitat area. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 7 (g) The project provides a convenient and extensive bicycle/pedestrian network, and access to available transit. While this standard is not applicable, this proposal has been designed to provide a pedestrian friendly development with direct pedestrian access from the courtyards to the public sidewalk system on SE 7th Avenue and the proposed sidewalk on Marine Way. In conclusion, the only applicable performance standards appear to be (a), (b), (d), and (e), and a finding of substantial compliance can be made with respect to these standards. In terms of the performance standards requirements for the RM zoning district, the proposed density of 10.2 units per acre can be supported. LDR Section 4.4.6 (H) (Special Regulations - RM zone district): Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.6(H)(3) (Special Regulations), recreational areas shall be required for all new rental apartment developments, and of owner occupied developments which have homeowner associations that must care for retention areas, private streets or common areas. New developments must include recreational features that are designed to accommodate activities for children and youth of all age ranges. Tot lots are appropriate for toddlers; features such as a basketball court, volleyball court, and open playfields are appropriate for older children. A pool and clubhouse, unless specifically designed for children, is not considered to meet this requirement. Projects having fewer than 25 units may be exempted from this standard where it is determined by the approving that it is not practical or feasible to comply. This development will consist of eight fee-simple townhouses and one condominiumized duplex with a homeowners association. As there are only 10-units, it is not practical to require a tot lot or recreation areas/swimming pools. It is noted, however, that the townhouse units include swimming pools, garden areas and gazebos and the duplex units include in- ground spas and garden areas. In this situation, installation of playground equipment should be left to the property/unit owner, as it would be for infill single family dwellings or duplexes_ LDR Section 4.3.3(0) Special Requirements for Townhouses: Design Standards (The development proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.3(0), except as follows): The applicant has requested that an internal adjustment be granted for LDR Section 4.3.3(0)(3)(b), which indicates that setbacks interior to the project shall be measured from the platted street system. Concurrent with granting relief from a development standard or regulation, the granting body must find that such relief does not diminish the practical application of the affected regulation and that by granting such relief a superior development product will result. The rear setback for the eight townhouse units is taken from the T-shaped interior street system, which is located in the center and on the west side of the property. The required setback is 25' for the two story townhouses and 30' for the three story townhouses. The proposed setbacks range from 10' to 14' on the second and third floors and 18' to 22' on the first floor. Including the 24' wide street system and the 5' wide landscaped area, a total of 47'-51' will separate the buildings from the ultimate property line in the rear. This design • SPRAB Staff Report • Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 8 increases the setback from the residential properties to the west while increasing the amount of open space in the front of the townhouse units. The access road primarily serves more as an alley than a street, as the properties will have frontage on the adjacent streets .(Marine Way and SE 7th Avenue). The orientation of the buildings provides a more pedestrian friendly streetscape and design concepts of a traditional neighborhood development. Usually setbacks from alleys are less than street setbacks. In addition to the proposed two car garages, the proposed minimum 18' setback on the first floor will allow two cars to park in each driveway. The proposed decrease in setbacks does not diminish the practical application of the regulation. A superior development project results as there are no driveways in the front yards or garage doors facing the street, which provides a pedestrian friendly streetscape. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Parking: Pursuant to Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(c), 25 parking spaces (2.5 spaces per unit x 10 units = 25 spaces) are required for this 10-unit townhouse development. The proposed development provides two-car garages for the 8 townhouse units and 4 surface parking spaces for the duplex structure, for a total of 20 total spaces. While eight of the units have two-car garages and two parking spaces in the driveway, tandem parking spaces are only allowed in conjunction with single family detached residences and duplexes [Ref. LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(a) and (b)]. Without credit for the tandem spaces only 20 spaces have been provided. The applicant has requested a reduction in the required parking pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(1)(g), to reduce the required parking to 20 in that tandem parking can be utilized to provide an additional 16 parking spaces. An additional 16 parking spaces can be accommodated in a tandem configuration if the driveways of the townhouses are utilized. The proposed parking in the garages and associated driveway configuration function as single family or duplex developments, wherein, guest parking is provided at each individual lot. A reduction is recommended based upon the specific development proposal, as granting the reduction will not infer that only two spaces are needed for each unit, but that the driveways will be utilized for parking. The City has approved similar parking space reductions under similar circumstances. Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting must be provided. A site lighting and photometrics plan has been provided to ensure compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8. Six concrete light poles are proposed throughout the site, which feature decorative acorn style lanterns. There are wall mounted decorative industrial style light fixtures, which will flank the garages and the entrances to the north and south units. However, wall mounted light fixtures were not indicated for the duplexes. A condition of approval is that the duplexes have wall mounted light fixtures adjacent to the individual entrances. The applicant should also consider including lighting on the east side of the property adjacent to Marine Way. An additional condition of approval is that all site lighting be indicated on the landscape plan and site plan to prevent conflicts with site improvements and landscaping. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. • Page 9 Visibility at Intersections: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.14(A)(1), the sight visibility triangle at a driveway/accessway must be 20'. The sight visibility triangle shall consist of both sides of an accessway formed by the intersection of each side of the accessway and the public right-of-way, with two sides of each triangle being twenty (20)'feet in length from the point of intersection and the 3rd being a line connecting the ends of the other 2 sides. Additionally, unobstructed cross- visibility shall be provided at a level between 3' and 6' in height. This requirement has not been met at the entrance of the development where a 5' high decorative metal fence is proposed within the site visibility triangle, thus reducing the sight distance triangle to 6'. The applicant has requested a waiver to the requirement. Prior to granting a waiver, the Board shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, d) Does not result in the granting of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. While the required 20' sight distance triangle has not been met (5' proposed), there will be an additional 6' of driveway before the proposed sidewalk (11') and 20' before the edge of pavement of Marine Way. This effectively provides adequate sight visibility. The waiver does not affect the provision of public facilities nor should it affect the neighboring area. The granting of the waiver will not result in the grant of a special privilege as similar waivers have been granted for similar circumstances. The waiver should not result in an unsafe situation. LDR Section 5.3.1 (Right-of-way Dedication): Per LDR Section 5.3.1 right-of-way dedications to meet minimum standards must be mad_ e with all developments. The required right-of-way width for SE 7th Avenue is 60' and 40' is currently provided. For existing streets, reductions in right-of-way width may be granted by the City Engineer upon a favorable recommendation from the Development Services Management Group (DSMG). The City Engineer and DSMG approved the reduction in the right-of-way to 50, thus an additional 5' of right-of-way must be dedicated from this development. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. LDR Section 6.1.3 (Sidewalks): Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-way adjacent to the property. A 5' sidewalk exists along SE 7t Avenue and a sidewalk is proposed along the east side of the property (Marine Way). It shall be noted that the installation of the 5' sidewalk along Marine Way is part of the Marine Way road improvements and will be installed by the City of Delray Beach. The proposal also includes pedestrian connections to the existing and proposed sidewalk along SE 7th Avenue and Marine Way. A 5' sidewalk exists along SE 7th Avenue. • • SPRAB Staff Report • Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 10 Plat: The subject property is required to be platted as the units are to be for fee simple ownership. As the proposal involves reconfiguration of lot lines and easement dedications, a subdivision plat must be processed pursuant to Chapter 5 of the Land Development Regulations. The plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits. Recordation of the plat is a condition of approval. An attached condition of approval is that the plat must be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS ' ; Existing Coconut Palms are to be relocated along the west property line (behind the townhouse row) and under planted with a Ficus hedge. In front of the Ficus hedge a combination of Cocoplum and Croton are proposed. Relocated Sabal Palms under planted with a massing of Cocoplum are proposed at the northwest corner of the site. Satin Leaf trees under planted with a variety of ground covers and shrubs are proposed within the landscape islands that separate the driveways. A Coconut Palm, accent plant (standard), and a variety of shrubs and ground covers are proposed within the front yard of each townhouse. While each planting bed will contain a different variety of plant material, it has been designed to provide a unified look along Marine Way. A Coconut Palm under planted with Liriope and Pentas are proposed within the landscape nodes located within Marine Way. Each townhouse has a courtyard, which is situated in the front of the units including a pool, deck, gazebo and tropical plantings. While the landscape design within the courtyards is similar, a variety of landscape materials are utilized to provide diversity. A similar landscape scheme as described above is provided around the duplex structure. Trees 14' in height are to be installed along the north and south property lines to help buffer and soften the visual massing of the proposed structures from the adjacent properties. LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), requires a 5' landscape strip between the vehicular use area and the abutting property and only 4'-6" is proposed along the west property line behind the townhouse row. The applicant has requested that the 5' requirement be waived in order_to accommodate the 6" wide curb along the driveway aisle. Waiver Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. The request involves a landscape requirement, and does not affect the provision of public facilities. The granting of the waiver will not result in the grant of a special privilege, as the waiver would be granted in other similar situations. The waiver will not affect the neighboring areas, as the same amount of required landscaping can be installed within the 4'-6" SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. • Page 11 landscape strip. Further, the landscaping provided within this buffer is dense and exceeds code requirements. Based upon the above, staff supports the waiver request. DEM-OLITION ANALYSIS Harbor House, 124 Marine Way: The 2 story, 22 unit apartment/hotel (plus manager's apartment/office) building was constructed in 1951. It is a c.b.s. structure, designed by Delray architects Pope and Blake and built by the Thieme Company. Both firms were prominent in the City at the time the building was constructed. Except for its pleasing proportions and U shaped plan, the building has little architectural significance. Harbor House was originally built for the Waterway Realty Company, which may have been a name chosen by the developers as there is no record of a realty company of that name in the City. 132 Marine Way: The single-family residence was constructed about 1937 by builders Lawson & Waters for Mr. William Tiers. The building's plans are on file but the architect is unknown. Shortly after the building was constructed a bedroom and bath addition was built on the northwest corner of the house and a freestanding garage with storeroom was constructed to the southwest of the addition. The structure is designed in the Minimal Traditional style, which was popular in the City during the 1930s and 40s. It is of frame construction with a stucco finish and set on a concrete foundation; the gable roof is finished with composition shingles. Some of the original windows and shutters are existing, however, the original screened front porch has been enclosed and the entrance door has been relocated from the east to the south elevation. 136 Marine Way (Lot 12, Block 126): The original buildings on this site consisted of a 2-story duplex on the rear of the lot and.a one story single family residence facing Marine Way. Samuel Ogren designed both buildings in 1952. In 1968 a second floor was added to the single-family residence. The second floor addition was designed by Delray Architect, Kenneth Jacobson and with the exception of the existing coins, completely altered the original Ogren design. Sliding glass doors replaced the original front windows and French doors were replaced by awning windows on the south elevation. 135 SE 7th Avenue (Lot 19, Block 126): In 1953 a small cottage on Lot 19 was demolished and the owner of 136 Marine Way constructed a garage apartment. Lots 12 and 19 were probably combined at this time, as the garage apartment is located only a few feet from the rear property line. Miami Beach Architect Lester Avery designed the garage apartment, but plans for the building have not survived. At some point the garage was converted to an additional apartment. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), The HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings; • SPRAB Staff Report • Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 12 (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing on the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure, is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. None of the structures would fulfill the criteria for individual listing in the National Register, nor do they represent a level or design or craftsmanship, which could not be reproduced at a reasonable cost. The 23 unit Harbor House is the largest apartment complex in the Marina District, however there are other multifamily units built during the same time frame and in a similar style. There are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property, which are appropriate in design and character to the district and the streetscape. DESIGN ELEMENTS �- The architectural style of the proposed 10-unit townhouse development is best described as a contemporary version of the Florida Vernacular style. The 8-unit townhouse building features a yellow stucco finish and a standing seam metal roof finished with a green patina. Architectural detailing includes raised stucco banding, decorative rafter tails and support brackets, cedar wood shutters, decorative chimney caps, a decorative cupola, and balconies with metal railings. Variations in window treatments have been provided. This includes single hung windows, double hung windows, casement windows, bay windows and windows that contain fixed glass. For added interest, all of the windows feature raised stucco sills and lintels. Also proposed are French doors with paned glass and plate glass. Some of the French doors have decorative, cedar wood shutters. The elevations vary from one side of the project to the other but are related by their contextual surroundings and their similar architectural characteristics. It shall also be noted that increased setbacks as well as varied front offsets are provided with the townhouse units. The townhouses have attractive freestanding wood entrance gazebos with gabled roofs and decorative bracketed roof supports. The duplex structure features many of the same architectural details as the townhouses. However, the duplex also features slight Bahamian undertones. Such as the louvered Bahama shutters, the chamfered cedar wood balcony posts, an arched, stuccoed garden wall and a solid wood front door. The variations between the townhouses and the duplex are complimentary to one another. The proposed design elements for the development proposal achieve consistency with the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Marina Historic District streetscape. Fence: SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. • Page 13 A 6' high wood privacy fence is proposed along the north, south and west sides of the property. Along Marine Way, a decorative metal fence is proposed. Along SE 7th Avenue a stucco wall is proposed. A wood fence is not appropriate for the proposed style of townhouse development. This wall should be continued along the north and south property lines as the wood enclosure is not the appropriate enclosure for this style of structure. However, the applicant may incorporate a wood fence along the west side of the property adjacent to the interior street system. Provision of the wall is attached condition of approval. REQUIRED FINDINGS . Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the following areas: Section 3.1.1 (A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of MD (Medium Density residential 5-12 du/ac) and is zoned RM (Medium Density Residential). The RM zone district is consistent with the MD Future Land Use Map designation. The proposed multiple family (townhouse) development is allowed as a permitted use in the RM zone district. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to consistency with the Future Land Use Map designation. Section 3.1.1 (B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. _. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, when all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval are addressed. Section 2.4.5 (F)(5) - Compatibility (Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. • SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 14 The subject property is bordered on the north, south and west sides by RM zoning and CF on the east. The adjacent land uses include: to the north and south, single family residences; to the west, both single and multi-family residences; and to the east, the municipal marina. The proposed townhouse development will result in a reduction of residential units from 33 to 10. The existing development has inadequate on-site parking, therefore the residents park in the adjacent right-of-way. The proposed townhouse development has been strategically designed to create the least impact on adjacent properties and provides adequate on-site parking. The proposed development of the property will be an enhancement to the area and will aid in the appreciation of nearby property values. Based on the above, a finding of compatibility can be made that the proposed development will be compatible and harmonious the adjacent and nearby properties. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable objectives and policies have been identified. Future Land Use Element: Objective A-1: Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate and complies in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is complimentary to adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs. The property was previously developed as a 33 unit multiple family used as seasonal apartments. The proposed townhouse development with a density of 10.2 units per acre is consistent and complimentary to the existing residential development in the area. The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan calls for the provision of infill housing as well as the development of property to provide a variety of housing types. This development proposal fulfills these needs. Housing Element: Objective B-2: Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in this Element. Policies which will implement this objective include: Policy B-2.2 - The development of new adult oriented communities within the City is discouraged. New housing developments shall be designed to accommodate households having a range of ages, especially families with children, and shall be required to provide 3 and 4 bedroom units and activity areas for children ranging from toddlers to teens. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential development located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. The proposed duplex and townhomes are all three-bedroom units, which is consistent with this policy. Furthermore, each unit features pools, spas and garden areas. As discussed SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Town homes. • Page 15 previously, since the proposed development is considered an infill project with fewer than 25 units (10 units proposed), it is appropriate to waive the requirement for the provision of activity areas. Consequently, the proposed development is consistent with this housing policy. Coastal Management Element: ' Objective C-1: The retention, rehabilitation, and protection of historic resources as provided for in the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance shall continue to be applied in the Coastal Planning Area. The Marina Historic District shall continue to be redeveloped with a sympathetic blending of the demands of economic development and historic preservation. Policy C-1.2: The middle and southern portions of the Marina District shall continue to be enhanced through the renovation of existing single family and multi-family structures, sensitive rehabilitation of historic structures, and new construction which is appropriate to the historic district. The proposed townhouse development is located in the middle portion of the Marina Historic District. The redevelopment of the Harbor House property will eliminate an existing non- conforming situation with respect to density and parking. The improvements to the property will provide new construction that is appropriate to the district and will enhance property values in the district. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with this policy. REV'IE'Inv BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of September 28, 2000 the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) recommended approval of the development proposal. Public Notices: Formal public notice has been provided to property owners within a 500' radius of the subject property. Courtesy Notices: Courtesy Notices were provided to the following homeowner and civic associations: • Marina Historic District • PROD (Progressive Residents of Delray) • Presidents Council • Beach Property Owners Association • Via Marina Homeowners Association • Seagate Towers Letters of objection and support, if any, will be presented at the HPB meeting. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 16 ASSESSMENT AND 'CON The development proposal is demolish the existing 33 unit development and construct an 8- unit townhouse and a duplex. The proposal is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. While the proposal involves a number of variances and waivers, relief from the Land Development Regulations is necessary to accommodate a more pedestrian friendly development with vehicular access to the rear of the property and garden areas with pools in the front yards. Consistency with Chapter 3 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations will be achieved provided the conditions of approval are addressed. A•L T.E R NA T A. Continue with direction. B. Approve COA-417 and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Marina Bay Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility), Section 4.4.6(1) (RM- Performance Standards), and Section 4.3.3(0) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to conditions. C. Deny COA-417 and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements for Marina Bay Townhomes, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) (Setbacks), and Section 4.3.3(0) (Townhouse Requirements). S'T A EF7, RECOIVlMsENDATION By Separate Motions: Demolition Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1) approve the demolition of all of the structures located on Lots 8,9,10,11,12 and 19 of the subject property. Variances Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1) grant the variances to LDR Sections 4.3.4(K) and 4.6.15(G)(1)(a) to reduce the building setbacks as described in the report. Waiver Approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), to reduce the required 5' perimeter landscape requirement to 4'6" along the west, north and south sides of the property adjacent to the internal roadway. SPRAB Staff Report Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Building Elevations for Marina Bay Townhomes. Page 17 Special Action Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(c), approve a request for a parking reduction of 5 parking spaces in that a total of 36 parking spaces are available utilizing tandem parking spaces for each unit. Internal Adjustment: Approve an internal adjustment to LDR Section 4.3.3(0)(3)(b) to allow 18'-22' rear setback, versus the required 25'. Site Plan: Approve COA-417 and the associated the Class V site plan for Marina Bay Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility), Section 4.4.6(1) (RM-Performance Standards), and Section 4.3.3(0) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. That the duplexes have wall mounted light fixtures adjacent to the individual entrances; 2. That all site lighting be indicated on the landscape plan and site plan; 3. That an additional 5' of right-of-way be dedicated along SE 7th Avenue; and, 4. That the plat be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. Landscape Plan: Approve COA-417 and the associated landscape plan for Marina Bay Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations. Design Elements: Approve COA-417 and the associated design elements for Marina Bay Townhomes, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.18, subject to the following condition: 1. That a 6' high stucco wall be continued along the north and south property lines. Attachments: • Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C • Site Plan, Floor Plans, Landscape Plan, Building Elevations Report prepared by: Michelle E. Hoyland, Planner • APPEtNDIX CONC Li: RRENCY ;FIN'D1NGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service will be provided via a service lateral connection to the existing 2" main along the east side of SE 7th Avenue and the existing 6" main along Marine Way. ❑ Sewer service will be provided via a service lateral connection to a proposed 8" main located in the internal street system of the project which will connect to the 8" sewer main within Marine Way. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided as a fire hydrant is located at the northeast corner of the site within the Marine Way right-of-way. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to these level of service standards. Drainage: Drainage will be accommodated by an exfiltration system. There are no problems anticipated in complying with SFWMD requirements and obtaining the required surface water permit. Based upon the above positive findings may be made with respect to this level of service standard. Streets and Traffic: The proposed 10-unit multiple family development will generate 70 new vehicle trips per day onto the surrounding roadway network. This is a reduction of 161 trips from the 231 currently generated by the existing 33-unit development. There is adequate capacity on the surrounding roadway network to accommodate the traffic associated with this development. It is noted that according to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, residential development east of 1-95 is exempt from meeting concurrency. Thus, the proposal complies with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Based upon the above, a positive finding can be made with respect to traffic concurrency. Parks and Open Space: The proposed units will not have a significant impact with respect to level of service standards for parks and recreation facilities. However, pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, whenever a development is proposed upon land which is not designated for park purposes in the Comprehensive Plan, an in-lieu fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of building permits for each unit. Thus, an in-lieu fee of$5,000.00 will be required of this development. Solid Waste: Trash generated each year by the proposed residential development consisting of 10 units will be 5.22 tons per year, which is less than the 17.16 tons generated by the existing 33 apartment units. Thus, this proposal will not have an impact on this level of service standard. a ST`ANDARDS ..FOR :SITE PLA,N 'ACTIOsNS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Appropriate separation of travelways is made for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians in a manner consistent with objective D-1 of the Traffic Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open Space enhancements described in Open Space and Recreation Objective B-1, are appropriately addressed. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent D. That any street widening associated with the development shall not be detrimental upon desired character and cohesiveness of affected residential areas. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent F. Vacant property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent G. In order to provide for more balance demographic mix, the development of "large scale adult oriented communities" on the remaining vacant land is discouraged. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent x$ APPENDIX C • :CRITERIA FOR GRANTINGVARIANCES„ Pursuant to Section 2.4.7(A)(5), the Historic Preservation Board must make the following findings prior to granting a variance: (A) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings subject to the same zoning (The matter of economic hardship shall not constitute a basis for the granting of a variance); (B) That literal interpretation of the regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties subject to the same zoning; (C) That the special conditions and circumstances have not resulted from actions of the applicant; (D) That granting the variance will not confer into the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other lands, structures, and buildings under the same zoning. Neither the permitted, nor nonconforming use, of neighborhood lands, structures, or buildings under the same zoning shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance; (E) That the reasons set forth in the variance petition justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and, (F) That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with general purpose and intent of existing regulations, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Pursuant to Section 4.5.1(J), in acting on a variance requests the Board may also be guided by the following as an alternative to the above criteria: (1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenances, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site. (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of a historic site or a historic district. (2) Or, as an alternative to Sub-Section (J)(1), that a variance is necessary to accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of a structure within a Historic District or upon a Historic Site through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (a) The variance would not significantly diminish the historic character of the Historic District or Site (b) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to effect the adaptive reuse of an existing structure or site. (3) The Board shall otherwise follow procedures and impose conditions as required of the Board of Adjustments. • • i ELIOPOUL03 AND .' MN.rzRMRc? : wM•e Pl.IE nrrb.,rzar^cAL n.MDATM.CM MICR•.[R>,1,uaxxe 8E.4,19REET k ,RrLLLrr Lr,U.r>aO.^O.S,OPtAntI.NOR< ,l,n>; NULLneY NtM RA1� 16 IAm.VW TIt[Rr,.r,1.,ww.t�,L;M., _ .. — — — s` ��t F'! f �,. ~LNo.ToTotteLloote.ITT.PA`Mvi'eo .i._ioo i,Tm°:':'cn's.CNPRP. rnr°n[iee`:uii501,..L^nNULL��,�,.•rzM�,u,u —_ -___—._..—_. _—_..—. p�t�E�`e uar �1�' A !' � t...t.10 ,rare.,.rt MRMM �G, .. ,n, M A... .tM,[wr..,MMMaN.t.,r.LLr.^N,�•rrR�.,,,r. I:,; :� �; ;ifT•j� � ASSOCIATES,INC. G !WILL.,T TS...CET 0 At/.M u`;';.�o:.;:o�r..LL rr471 a I....._.✓' f wi f�a.��:�;i Artie�t �Prrr,.r.and .'•. NIT L ;u.rrr,n u:MOENS ORED an`c oum'C,u.c vnruni m mow;eoaM`R'vs° .. _ —.. I r..fr7 ,e' : '� ,c.Nu nNO LC 11 vu�•�rrL,ctevN.e uarCcw�Me.�!THE,. .raevC. - ' D t 4, .'"To (, _ r MO cwn a Arc„�Ru,ea•rm,Rltcs b;uLNl">.%Mto oeeR,n e"'Y [ r ^'� 1 W�.rf I. ALL PT. Ebr[RATAN ailw Rx,cva ,� ..A..IMK,.RP rr•w rnl•r[RMKM...... ii I '�« • Ili'' ,C rt bxrw'i MRrin4,LroaC, Cato lmq CtLMrtr.wepo.rxriC r. N�•Lr,e�„ y • }se r r+41,[ar,♦ t4Errt�Mm c r,. .+! •a r e — - evto HA • �� ,Rxore N,Re,bLNLOCONITNAle s ALP Ro,-• •w:OAConI..Mlc+btort. .Lte.+L.�MRP•..+[:aoR^,ebeeLLar,M+a,c .. _ I,R.... f{""" ( LOCATION MAP LR„o. NOS u.,[.. NLNrw.,,r...,MMLam.rL.CrzMb.nrr.r.n..nMarroomm.R — �'R�" _ —v� 1y r:' I NWT W11,1•06 Cr a AIL•P%K:e e c LICT..,R , E Y,Y.Ot' 0 ,C. ,•, r,. ) ' . I I/ mn�mcm, ywi Y'�I~ — w- 1� _I" I • I :J r [� v' • 1 ' � � � .1 /fruuui tt i; • 1 r I Y' a fl tweSE� M,.. wALL. M..wMam 'PO— -- --_ 1, 11 l [ I r.,, I � 1 — — — tfrii) _t' # i hi�i A }II :1:111)//111;1'in lliilfJlr 3-- • IllaL.�MMPr.,Nn;MM Rrzar x .,Mrrrwar rI {� I I]rwu+acR.xc,ewne,c \r ., 5w I I N7TE51P1 LL mu/ oof oeNT.To,re tot oproto or.ra,[m { i n,r. Or wMr.wr,.� .,r �µL:�ocr^.n..�a.M — M ,41, ;Il1f.•u�� _ , 1 . �t �`oro`,o"-"��:zi"e:e<++rcM N.n., --- R,rw 1111 L..'�:ro'� • t' ar--1 • '.tmil.I :"F :="t: MARINA BAYi MERIT">" ¢-R Vu PLORIDA TMCIPL NEW,CO. a I+ I�� a. f;. ^f `gala i g. ^W 1t I 111I11J M Cr NOLO PI[:•u,ATME u 1 err f '.- 11 I I .r.....,.....�.L.. ..e LOCO .o uALL.a ON WA ALL �m b^,CP n�,r.et REAR 1ALLa.r • ▪ ��• .f [J • o CLTNr[:m°";:;ea•,^•.m^.•,[,;,[.ALL r>.C• I:, ( _ • MPPITS !MAIL PH aL,nR ro•:lo Rru,eR+u.eae��RA le eer�wawLMt+t ''i I 11001 - 1 111I � e �"'a,. I mN.r, aK<<a,EAM.mR•M •NMI ..n.M M [MM ^,�L � riflll.lR� . M r[.Tt ti 0FLA MO MO;,•w°.00� R.rzrerx�t. ITAT: •«ATE en.„ter III.tll((_ ,.. 11 �A Inflnnlf _AMONGTog N.— . �r� rre,,,.Nt.x,wm.^ a�,r b,x ...ewrz, ,. R ilk .{ lc„' , �� flllll .41w ., >m II , 'iili • . I]i1 .rcramr a [h I1.1 n. AMA,ORM c t� utss MINE WAY SE.P1D err iC 11,J¢'111 9`� I iiill'ifi'liiiilliiiiiiiii' DL9IIAYEfEACHR • g; I Ii 1 ?j' �, 11 I*r[a �u ART r. } 1 r j,rr 1 y} NUN. •,r•.,,1. I�•. ,.1. (� . iIl _ 1 �.1lll { I • .I El 7�[],rf1' 11 + aL�I R...,.,..r.. n>rmer 1l �., 'S-.I..-R,V ITT::: fI �1r L 4�I y CIti[lute arr.. ... eldt M[kll R' `11.f`Ti.l""'ft r]9ifC"•1 II rel Ns _il l �T11IJ /l 1 �a.. Mt , ns.,,r 1 � I Ann. F'FIEU.IIAfiY EtE'fSI ssi e... � �.. .« � , u, Er a„E r..e.M[r,w.a.. .s. rwlpp 11 ex+fL7L rr. ,, wr f c a — r»:a.-wiu;�j x.., ..pm LooLT .MO ONO I a,«T LeCIEyv Tel R w[. J29A18J i. N to I g 8 m PLAN Dr s. tit]i I :^ SITE PLAN 44 1.6o r 4 'rt�A•crnM,r MW9 res0•,RM [MInRA^A r[.nCR!u 1_Tu7 wRvrtN7> Napo,•Pry. - — cl M"9.11.00 I JK•N is .T.NUN. • 2CCJl9 • A1.00 1 • --- -- 0 '- .41441.1•61001.6761:11:4114 a .414111101.411.1/044444•41044 ELICP011-06 AND ravra000FRIMial Tr. 1 COVER111 114411.116 PAWN* .__,.." ''.1 it Z.--to.04141.14 tot CM m.....- • 1500' rY0 0 — El • , . . _ . ABBOCLATEEI,NG ArchlkwiA Phowers end Designers . 1 1) 9 1. 0•441 6•441../1•41. 1444 . 6 111.1 5111414-11411 1414;54147.41" l' t t.tt _ IP -;!,... • '7) . _ - • ..0 yi !cll. 1.ar..• I", ) n•-..• 1; i'..!....• ,•• ''• fl'-''If •••.r k f••• .0... • ,...• ••}: ...:. .k, 40411711.14.101. 3 k ,.3,_ L.._ ... .......'' . '• .1,1. _ (•:.3 4141 1. t ---- .• . .. . UP -FM 'It b ; i I: '..i MOM • -V,11_ '--./.f: ,,,2---\\ ......, — . \ A -.4 /---N‘ 1-.1....Z./J:3=-4.42'V:-. .....-I .....--t .0. -7- ./• ......= ',en. 1 .ic Rs.* Z.M ti • .,-...- " '''. '' :Tr I ... . I " LA • !e ..6,-„,:s.- • F...... r r i r.k 1§ i _ 6... k - ;k g i , ti ! .1 Tr 4titIviai :i -.7._. 1,1 IT I- g,_.• ._ J Iii_ _ -11 x r i t :I' t ; 4,j) ...I_1 r i MARNA BAY ...: NV -: '"' 4°k g \If:U.:IL:7 ot. ---- 1- .-. _ !!.. i =.- 1...I ) ,-"T --, :-1 1 ) :--r:::"-frJi 4 i . ...,..... r..,., ,_,,,.. c.-.irz, 2,.,-_.,::,r_k 11, t r.,_7,,,,, ,...,,,, ,,„ ,-., 7-,-Alf,r,,, t ( ,41 ....i „...1 l' -',..,!3F,-..;'....L.--:1,1 ) : t 141 ...11.\'77.44 I 11.1:1• 't.... '1--.1 4 ... 1' 1 _:;_.1 •1;"••;!•'` -„, i[, -—., ,,. 47,.. I I r":: - .,..•,,,i, • 'II-,''''-.1‘., I r:.--I i- F —. — ..,..4...1 .N.... wt.,:\ ' Liii_„,fy• F-1-).' fr t.11 424 ,. ,,.. --- -L'.7 lt, v , -• \ 4 - 1,itr7.. 1 •,./ - ,,',.:',-.1'. s. eri.-±J:j •=1. ,,..... Pr5-12J4 - -. , _ ..I'LL.41 6:4:,_‘1,,,,,,, —1/ I=..(7,.1: .,-,-Z-.., '.. Tr:ral,•:1, I'''I - ... .,..-. ()....... a / ... I ',;•'''' . L ."Zia I 1: '... • '4 tri,V. • `. 4,7,kg ,t it Peified. - .. ••i.,"i 4, ." . -skilE1(1& . '''4•••k ".. ill 6. '4 6. $1.1e111- t '1-11111111 ___:. , 01: •.' \ - .:, • •• \ r.-A -u- • 4"..:.7. 76..e. • 1 _ . I- i '..,\ 4 irdilic. .- .•.- • ,, k„ 44.riam 9 Li 11.44/47 140011 glp 1 '''[ ,ff• i.t - •-• - '": ..„, -- -t- - ----t.. ..—-,n- -.,,, ri,t1,, .__, lk; i, MAME WAY W.WO IIT tr „ S •••••••04,44g I 11 •• ,,_ 11111-'..Bil ''-...4.1L- '.I . • 14f." - * -' ' i -r; •i. ,. -"' I [ 1 4iii_jet 7 L N ...111 ' ] 14 I k •.! ((( DUJIAY MACH,rt. V L. ffiti . ,,-.1E4)3,. E r ' ' T 1.- el P' 9 09::•191'911 • .--tH t i 1 I. H , ___1 •1,,I t• E it ':.i. " ' 11 : 41-ii '''• i - r .. .. 4 41 [ I :' 7,/ i: /I/ i.it ) • -\ •••••\ \ is,) -- - r'''\' k t i ' ,-:ip, k ..,._1 i 1 ,,..."j . . ,i,.. ,,,, _.....• 11\4.4,.; ..7:2.41...., ._•61 _,...11. f 6,1 ,11.1 • .- !..9., 11'4'-- '• '',.. . 1!: ' ,' 0 •••••.7.--;1.,--t-,,__0-... _ " t-..r,.:,''. ' .... ' (...., ...• ,•• =_=.-.__: -,- ' .--z-r,•__f__. 1"... 1 ,, c .... I t i ''''''' •t \‘- I . 1 7. 1 • 3_ I- - 't 1 -. •••••••• .3__ _r.I.- t i ••••• ..s.'-li 1 '''''. •t L.2-- El-'s t I IP 3 1.."." 1 :, --1 i - I 1 ., ..—..1—,i ,P. -1------- -1 0 1 : , 1 sii *1./i- 1 13 rj 1 )3 ri. 1-1 i' ., ,-_ ..„--t, r ,----.13 • li-- . ' r ti: tk‘ rr— "'"'"'" 32M200 411.16•14.mu '' 1 "'_ I 1 .,...1 1- ./ . i WOUND . FLOORPLAN X •r- "V, . - f O f , GM N ao2.00 I 7" GDOUND FLOal BUILDNO PLAN • • _______ (AVM 1.8. 1 . A2•00 ---- --. - -- - • • • • • • •• . •. . . _. .• ELlOPOUL08 AM •ON.Imo kw ba4199199.11 , ma Noe 9.99999999.9 mace ------____- Fi :.... ir! I il, 5? '."1 A8DDCIATIECI,NG . Arctlecft,Mirrors sod ii D41119)11111111 901 . . ._... . .. Ftlart • MI .. IV ...' ••• 11 .'" „,..„. . .„,. .‘),it. .r.-:)•(.• .t.-. I 1--- 11'7'.:._:..._T'....IfI,........,..t1,.......1.i..,e1x 9,I9,,11 91 1, .9i,-..•'..,'J..-,71.',. 1 !1il1.I ,'-.'.1' '(n.I•••179'' _ 2 11 .i\--1, i ..,•,...- 1 `-' ' I mod i . tl 1 I - , ,,,,L,,l I , / , : 1\ /. 1.7.__1 • ...; ', 1 •Il t mli.:]_....:r. ii\ /1 t 4 I \. / I; „ • WC, , ...'",' r.:-/C..-, '' _AI' (LLTC1CH ;-7\ Fit j._ . . . • 1 \ '7A. i'-'thiLl. K ,.. "..i- II T.31:171 - /\` 1 , T- > , I 1,S\,/c- ,......-, t" -' w r--:: _- 1.. 1..:Jr.-Ln..-..1 / .. . 1 )71L_,_.,......, : -.- -- — Lit_.,,...,[ ( /)( 42 rcc\ 22i 1 [1. / / 1 t ,\ t ; 1/ ,i ,.‘•-•" .- 'i " 13'1.111111 . AWIINA BAY 11111.1}J.L.i );14) ,, = L .1 .-_-; , o• ..1., .-.1 • i 1 19.91-9.9:91.9 (.'''' • :11 1 -1[11 l'i 4. 1 :II sl 4 4 I b /a .! Ur CI CUT• CC" , 1:, LUC ti ... .ff 1- ,,...,,A, 11.99.1J159.91.9m. II-9 MAK INN kV Pt..*AC 9[COTT 1......,emlArb MEM .-.• )41MT 9.9.1aral on a, .9•191.C., I"I i.1..t.r'.Ri ft '•6 4 PPM 1-.•A‘ 1 n mi r j •4 ........ 4 . I ' 1..-11111pil•- ' L.,.,) .. --. ,.. . • .„ • . ..oirttit ,11- . I.• . —.7 - . . r- ' 0 n .1 n 1 (;''.•...,(1:,,..,(1:,..,.,. . ,,,.... ' 1".4".P4'''. ''4 t.',.;,r1- ,1','. '+Lf..''''::, f'''4 4/ tlf •fi... '. . • .• 9 1- \(_,:fli: '-rifil-:r.frito."'...t!''''+‘)+, ,---ir41,..;;',1K--inv-.'...AA:,'/,'..1.!,'*!:{1.14(}1::'*#:•'44.1_,17,t'r,-'1.-.0 '. ' . . _ .:(1) .,k" ,A. .,..-- r...7-- n n . I 1 "um,WAY ar.stiDET : .• DELRAY REACH Pl. i---/&T.n.-)s--.n,,N... r9/LC911' .A._n...,,.,nr.„‘„ ,_ „ ., n n 0.91.0099 C 11919-9119 19 I ' 9 GTO, CIINI 919.9990.1 :9::c i 9,794 [1..00111 I —1 P3 .,......, .. .-... gi i i 11--.---H---11 i -- .---- ' . . . .„ _ ..,..,..,- f •-ef. -,Li• . , ,:.,.1 1,4,..i_ () ''',..^.".. i_ 1 • ' 'I''',..c.;ir/) ( / • . 1.1 •• ..-- ;-•:'''I-`74'-ii'',7'`----1+?." , .., I 'I_ rik-=1 . ::".7-ii::.:•_, • ‘? h I - - ..k 11111 1111. ' IiiIIIIII •....• " ' 3249201 ;II ..... . "II ii r . 11') "'.. l'I''./ lir .1'•••1 ' \If 11 '1. • I *.'• [0.00.111 rate ' i'' .. .._.... ...._ . SECOND R-00F1 PLAN • q'. SECOND 11_00(1 DULDIIIO PLAN 7.11.00 I x ' • 1 200329 • • 99.9.9.4 19.11.• . . • A2.01 • • • Y AI ABBOCIAIEB,NC. Homers sod IN 541 2/0 6120 t Kt Deelpners MYR VI l . : I tl /te I; j r .v. -- k.—, ,e..,,, „r<..., , we.n , r .tea . i . .: e�� • J I .,.:: Y� I ' r,_r/Y\,� Q '/� l 4 � r � , Ann �• /Y� r,' ['.M } / � title 1 � � 0 ''.1I.7-r"7 r-- ' illi ,„5„, GAINA BAY L � � 1 h� 6 t — ,yt,__tr,s v �1 �.r.,v'. ,.o , m ,1 Ap11r jI 7, ll u"° U W — .` 1 Irrr I Ci _._IY _ •l' C. --jar . / k N UJ „r«,na 310A102 l'$ I000.0 RTC n R-0Cfl PLAN TIMED BOOR BUI.DD10 PLAN ® un N 17 ~ 7.11.00 4I ' .0.r•.re ,w..uaa [NNW.....,A 100319[NNW A2:02' i r. Li aiorou oeAM L.J •• if - .._____. .. Q PARTY WALL I FA , rI 1 gal . ,. = ��. ASSOCIATES,NC .• fib _-_ .. .. _ and CI ..�°I . . r..• Je .. -- kohl**kners Mirrors Ilt . D•d__ 1__.e' 1 a — _�':c_1, r—.r_•.:__.� .r.r...JIZIImrnIui —c:r_._{1 ..••.r .. • r1 j11 Tr,54421•4011 113 - � ,r.rl,r , 9PA }4 1A � I (�t 0I] • m.D no A 0T1ER9 n t-I I j ' / N1F ly P , .nl' WW1m •.... --on aEf \ IXq. , yri pD• r y. _ AAI io _I 3 (C)It -, , _- •Iwnlwluuuw'; ��n(! { I� l[ -- I; INN }r ) rL3 6 C3 7�\i� ! (,( 1 ` ,•,.e .11 l ... Garr)hurt' 13\ . _ [_- I _ \ It• 0• •. l..LI `F•-� �`r �, _; r.... ErLa03ew. • i • -11'& 1 !1; »] I' tr 4'i - GREAT ROCM ( ,IW3 J # i ��l }. \ o-,uia ealr�ruY1 i' �' 4 mvrc,tmr j n '' mnn�6—nlmnl mwmwuoomuenn d S9 MARINA BAYI6 .xro„ro a i Q } • ] b rlranl A } 1 —� 1 �- TOWNHOUSES t _ I -. _ .. Y .,.... / I Ills 0 OwY! 7 .T lue f �� - - A�c new 1 nll J I IM u .7.._._ D'.r. _ -s _ r+• rw _.—. -..__n.r .---_. _._ ..._.. r e�._ •r •no—• rr c--�,-'} +� br / n L n Food 13 7 u� -- )- 1 6 --fi 1 :.„IIJ',L,„�q�tl� - _ix pua.mIn i ® _ _ �, _ �4 - r III SPA S. i TI 1 1•' 1-r .-_._0'•' _ l'r ._—JSt'.._... F.•__ a-•• 1' WAD r'�r -. 1 no. D „D . � -- _ f_ _ - r• I 1 OE{JIAY f3EA/AAFIFE WAY 8E 21D Hi. x •-- — 's I= r b .. 1 r'..- 5.1501 1 'I 1ST FLOOR AFEA: 13l1 eF. NO FLOOR AREA. 1.411 FT. 1ST FLOOR AREA: 1390 SF. PARTY WALL 7tI0 FLOOR AREA: 1,411 SF. 1'! TOTAL(IJIDEP.AIR/AREA. 7349 SF. i. TOTAL(IJIDER ROOF)AREA: FF09 Sr. TOTAL(IJIDER AIR)AREA. 2331 SF. }; Wirt 1 WIT J TOTAL(TNDER POOF)AREA: 2.191 SF., N FlialANANT 8E1 .7 7414011Y DUPLEX I I 2.0TO0Y DUPLEX ----- 1ST FLOOR PLAN - DUPLEX (1) WALL LEGEND f ,5�it�' FLOOR PLAN NOTES, SCALE:Tn•.Y-o �i R>»- I 1 tEli u",a �«..g., . ...."" 0.....•,. O:. m. AI?PPP/r•, S..e..•o».�,,Wit is hs'rDD'D,D. �Dronb. ��r 66.o°L•r•°rn6..NO ITC.tu w O" l Or...•nr..b r..rwart i w(T,,.rD rcDk,..•.,r, E.rl•Ct,.... El ,a, El• ..RP . D 1ST FLOOR PLANS • • g; pD...� [,Jl:� :T�w tiµ""'". (lw.:D E..'abet .D. lJae^.R .ro. g �®�uw., rJ r'w Me nu• raga r.� t DA� iC nroN.en• n moo'ae eu » ur,wv et ore, u• r NW..•T.•cr_ r EI lc.w,v+ ,n, Isee bn.t..,.,rr.n IJ AKI o u rro uu�ae nr.. lro.OP Dn,.as s•tb.xnu e,•,�el Krt. 410 ROIc,•ue+ (�J drt....O.n G w m.=b. T`11'Nc M.• I]WALL MI fm».14, [>,Y.I_..I•a•T,CCMHT ET DP•.n WDaroe4. © 'r t:VMn wwrw rD �L,.-�,, r.TiDDOORP . Or'..•.•-.••.'cm.brlHn al 4ib•n,vnal.ur lJ b ea. .DOo.ew�v,De (]rm neg..tarr. T —�$R ae i PPM n irQ e,w.ct.1 �n 9.i 1 RU 1717^ !I E.,.r 0 7.r.r .wtc m•Tu'br.Wr• M ' rr.J, r� L�..,. ..r.... ri ❑M 1.+•,c.r 1,1 .:r.nwo u•uE. co.rma,e°x rot FUG,••n3.b r4n..» T f°i,aru•w cv,m .lorz.•14 btTrcw.,.u•a 100379 r 1n.TRD PA.bw. IJer rcr ur.cv.On.. rC RI.e Nu El IJI n,.• I °»,-"-MK II Dr 1.1-1/00 On WOOD CD..ln.,w• ISM • • u „, ,Hn.. ,.u,„� �. .rc,. Dxa.�.��D.a• L o..��.n �].� •», /fi nF� ^ IDiuew...e...., »nr,Droca,re. QWWII..»r,.,....brzuwDrr. �].MA.....r•..De,,.n., Er•.. T1«I.l,re646.6-wan.• HL.O"} 1 L ELXVOULIOB8 0 Will SPA-Y WALL ---_--- - I' f. 1r1 oxia,Moms' •'•a f••. -1•n,_)'_+t_I•T—)'w I•-�_L.1'—._ l'M Y1 I ,'L r'1' M v .__.__L� Y )L'. _..E•r_.._. ..'..!- JLL—.- I-<_ ._.____ L. o ` L_:j of �� 1 o t �® 1 - 10 �,..�.w Z I } 4I ..I 1_::_ fd .. -- -_BED, _ .,. IoiYYY0i11 — T -4011 iJ,�i.)11JJe11JI I .. —,.ltr� - WI final-ill • BALCONY �"] Cli 5I, } }' FOR " LJ�ww�u1333-. sue+-s::...-`mow I1<i 'em ,e'•' �rs }'J, �c; }r }. t ! RANT �i v1 BALCONY } }• '�' '- �, ... .... .;,. ._ v :n I( 'I naeT R ATu C OTTUCTON __ E �O-- 701a0 f U - BEDROOMtl• �� 17 - — ► 1"11 B T _ p ►Ih"1� �.O }r )) >^ 7W1 SD �21 CO1J tl 1 y u UtI ITY fdiLL 1L 1� 1'I J. t 7l } - r ,di;1 t „ o l a �O�it o )7 N » 7f .1 10" I 7 »; �' S ql L _ fi g .i.. ` I I l Il t I i. tl <� ]■ �I Oa" ., �yl'�-'/ lk.•...,.L.. Y7J'77 1. _ MAOIE BEDROa1J J ,1 •� �....t.. IJ 1.—.-:; (7,i �'} ❑ p O • • - ��r ^ r }t• •=e3ncY I+ v.,ap7TI ©,a• ,r r.• _ �/%� _ , • - 4 1 » ® L .. I ©O /� In\ — �• ~• _"C — — '-Z�T Z'L':::T '. 'i'J . 13 —_- - - l/lI[ /!J C / A!V .,y , )1 ur I}\ •,�'� 't C 1X\\�T . tl ;` T 1 r_ 11 4 Tr _ A j I© ; O�❑ '! ,y n ✓, '.1.'.1 �� ' ItY'» T DEROa1 A ` [ / Y lO. Q 11 TJ}I- 'I �. r IJ\ v •, ( 700 - L_J .>�'- I i %MASTER BEDROOM _ . r � .�' t e a tl I, � I- 1 T — B BEDROOM - -- ' EN 1, WIC a•' /-�,� i• __ BALCONY aN,Y � L�,. ,� - .4a u.Y I' wH• nwL 11 - H _.._ f® WIIMWfle11111H11 -,Lja. L t, — L, �-. �- + ,• r.• _ ,' , .'• -� 11d J1 _ . I I O MARINA BAY l.._ 1 ®� MA 7 --AT LD • TOWNHOU: ft __ T •.`_'4'r Y �! » ' } D BALCONY .'6 - UIIII toe. ..�111®IIN •)Itl01eI10omY1Y1l -- _IIp11tl111 IIMIIMp1ENONNIe3Ne01/Ie11 ..4MIIIIIIIrniinium iI I I 11 I - ❑ --' - - - p _ ❑:.. 1_,— -_)• • ra • )' w._ ice. 3 w•_�} ro• )o• • .� . • ( 1 _ ,o.a ,OUID r-,PART'WALL :ND:ND FLOOR AREA: 1,4I1 SP. 7ND FLOOR AREA, 1411 BP. WAY BE Q OELAAY BEACH, TOTAL(IL IDER AIR)AREA, US4 SP. TOTAL(VlDER AIR)AREA, 7]33 SF. W TOTAL(TINDER ROOF)AREA. 7,145 SF. TOTAL(UNDER ROOF/AREA, 7,151 SP. n e,r wrw.,, lij UNIT I UNIT J -- -- N 11t a-stony DUPLEX iI 2.4ony DUPLEX......., qv,r«, 2ND FLOOR PLAN - DUPLEX SCALE,tin .r.o' »NNNr I () . . ) T I'N 2 PREIIIWTY BE WALL LEGEND g FLOOR PLAN NOTES: 4 ..Taoca• MOLD c•w •• • e•wY.aw �.%v•rt.w�4.•w4nlnw)••',<a4 ®w, J:1° O..cT.„w.xa wM1 <- 2. [o, raT.,Imre N•0'arnr ux, al L I n'4!.uOgl,OAT DOOM eon+MCC.MR f:l rveA »nlcr.r Y <Aa00 ts ©1;,1K1- wc.e•<,a,Ce u•Cwgw rl wecL,Ko r<p,cnq uar<r ❑ 2c rw�� ❑•.<•U..U.K.R.r Or<�+.tl KW,/ e.,n.ma,L uo wlurJ L'I roYIaY...RIu w ew,ew a U'a u4�o'1i.u;nu aoe. []» Ea.law,wa,n,w.101• ❑","R°"'"uu ��r DUPLEX 0�1. <w or1°u.b 1a...w� p; :A;a1, 1o,.«T• )1 @J•o4Taamo,.r --</." RxcacuuL 2ND.FLOOR p El w]rW,M E An..,CO.eq K.M1�n.n O. .1w, ant 114w.11 elr.a ,) 1 n.MI .w,pIY,J,'OC G Ea woo E WOOD n..2 J1 Jc,MU/Atl n CaW IH PLAN oOVER C,a,1, a�.r ..4.e R..T° o _ ..< �...... E<.,.Our, „ •••111,00M1 TIN co Iweu w • pi cx,..,.Ole.4_ ❑v.'.r••wr-r�.o,�aii+4O 4a e.n.•ow.,xn., E• 4•<a.,n EL4w e4•,w,w,u, LxrzwKvl leeE elw,clwu 1 n❑O�rcw. I< :. .y<,.•.1'c0•trn••<,N• E n Cwe�i nN l g•C•cMil wan E w'.f,, O Y cal uuw[w -�e.cP.c<R eLWcw4L u• ". Qa »Kn.. vn `,enrco Fn,)eE enacr, r.w 11 ❑� m men cw<cnw sox row .<r 1 9.11.00 {,{:, ❑r •.Tau ov.w<,atlw ❑e cx4ac4.Cwr<CR eC<rtve ., Y Y w,w1 ,auu 11 nR.4.L 1411 TO w.L,e u. K•,ti,� e ❑; p,�� ❑,.,<n","`w' ❑rwu.�un, euUV"t TO a PR IMO 200J1S o » J«,4,�t, ,.COLM. 0 .L,M14..ew,4wx.4n,a.,YL o4.aa•.~.n ,e,,cwo.a tl.r a. w;aaxp�.IC — Y. :" ❑ u w.n.x �r�, 1 „ow�,«r » 1...01R,w<•.Iw. •,n xa<, a ..ww..gR4 ue.,4 — — J A2.05 M IUit➢PART.-,LU LL• 1 • • EIJOPOUL03 AND r ,,i,, if,r .1.1 ..0., _ C01..11Cµ 11,C11 I.....W• . n L n u'"Z- rc_. n a7r1 7-,:r'-1 1.-r.v Eli 7 J 1 , 1 ii _._r r _ iOEI wrrrn.0 7 L: _ cs e nax.n.,"c.o.. f t C 11 � ®� o I fin"r., ASSOCIATES,INC. . _ I e.e {/.. t r - -_ AreNleale,Flamer*end •7 --- r r.---.-... --._r:o_.. .__-.{ -- - -n n nn' •C 1 .,- L ..-_—: r<.» — -" //-.-7 ill. ",in•, Oeelgnor* OK MOOR PLAN (�" OFi00E-DETAIL OF�OOR PLAN ®� r 6ECTKNI j_--of ti L\� `�/; '::°;.Kw ;•n.^,n o "... [MAD roll {F �_ ill, l� a . ram. ,,,,., Nrirm tr r'IJ�-, ,- "D NrtFr" i�l_; 0J.,r. 1 ,-Y� /0••.• .i �" .17. ' _ ._lc3l PARML SIDE ELEVATION ^II_ e: �.._. v I� '4'iir rcc. 1— 4`l� 1'iz.•rn 4'i''a m: �. '-----�- ./ ,r ` ,\. l_J I;` 3 Cl Qr_......--- OCOLUVN CONN.DETALS 11 .• ) 1• i(3l 03 .`.Ic�l I I\ of ��`I =in_�!�-n �n_n.�c.-c �T=ate ti R- = n_p B-Ic= - '� 1 I I L 1(j rJ &,CIl' �1 •-� rrrnw- ,;: OI --- ---- . • i ii Y Ii10NTELEVAtON I �I'I -1rf I _ _- I� 1^,T • -'I I , SECTION ®FRONT ELEVATION .o3SIDE ELEVATo _ I .."n,,,,,, it OFRONT ELEVATION - MIA r t• MARINA BAY II1I 11� 1.7.,,,11 fii rmi�l iiitili iii = -- Ir II. �I �l_ic a Tt I; IIIIII III 11111111 11111111 Ill - # Ir= -,:- II= iI 11 31 71— �i Y � ,k 111 111 - Ill 11111111 11111111 III -. I �Il I,-r1.II I vl , it 1! Il 11 Ir4 , II= I - II It II RJ: II II _II II II111 Liaq.11' lI �1 :� - I( I ;;_I II 11= II II —;1 I II III Illllllf IIIIIIII III III �= III J III IIIIIIII IJIIIIll III ' I I „= I�. I II II Ir- 1 �II_ 1 -I1Ij III .II -7 _ II II 111 WI1111 11111111 III _-____. JI= ; .li� C�_ I I -� , — f ll I II I u n _I ,ilI I I I_ n n n 1, fffl _11 III REFLECTED CLQ PLAN ROOF FOIAMINQ PLAN e REFLECTED CLO.PLAN ® ROOT-FRAMING PLAN I IE fl I -ir 1 :l 11 II II i1 '11- '!1 I ' Ory....... O—w. I II lI -ii II I -II `li 11 'II_ II ii 1 I I I I I II I II .II "il II -I -II II • MARTS WAY 8E 2YD 8T I 1 II- !{ II A II I J II 11 it II I I ))J f DELAAY MACK Ft J OQAZEDO'A' OQAZ®O'D' ..�y II, \ IL- �i JI-->t II =t_/ `! rII 11— 1 1 =T1 ,� 1L, ,,.n.P,M, . ,,,, „ !1 -41_ -11 -_i1--114 .-11 II—+1 IL --ii I�� • d - -- -- -- I I I I ILI '1 GAZEBO KEY NOTES I I II lL. II I I I I I I 11 d GENERAL - 11 II II 11 11 I( ll 11 ITII II if • I' • Y • a F,:. - - F31 c ,.; v.,, cr" ..',�..,:o l-rbJ cn.cMLOUA,�e:., FI n.r w.. .M,.o errer;o'enoo an.r.v_cm ,�..,. OFiIN.NJO PLAN __ %IPe .._./ u. �.,.,.�.i Lr.J ie:o::+.4 IALFrco,�t.rn no.n«.;'c".. oc� NT. a"eta neo: i",>1t.h ni.,.� ��N [e L1 rtl CAIIUNT HEWS ..�,uw,�rA..,.. .r ma's:, "�r ' r��A�,:.n.s,.�.n, MR,•1,.�., I o: .„rrK,. w•r .a�..o>,. x..r..�, o...m..x..nn,rM m i R... o n r,e.�,. 9 r..,..ne tix e+.,vnn ri.rr 05 .,er.o1,.1„gii•.nxro^--"r, ,urvrrr.uu,n .w ra.un InTinTin icxi .u.mAr"Nr..ic.o ,.,n..a —_— _ _—_ — nie•nnc,w�ne nu w�r.c,.".,ea«n • ,"tC1101,.H .w .wic.,.n. • r«. ce ..ur,o,.....a..,,....,r.oa TRELLIS KEY NOTES - r.,an e,x,...,,.,., n....,., .�.,.,e.o, ..� 1„ r„..M 4..4,. �.:P1=ileptassorr v,=';4.N7,n [.I lf-31 ., fJ • ,MGM,0IV..M.o..ar. lc,l .,",n,,,.... ("1 FL.1,k PRELIMINARY SET ... z - _ T � l � I 17 II r b 11111111 IIIIIIII1.1111 III 11 II 111 f,__. ,"„„�„ Y' 1 1 08} - _ ®EAST PERIMETER FENCE - GAZEBO/ i. a CARPORT TREWS ACM } ,rr ,r- -r ,a., ..S PRIVACY GA MP -L- miIQI 1I11IIII1 1 —�_ DETAIL SHEET r - -V -- 3''t. I l llh k 1 lOtl •i1ii Inlllgmill llrill mlpl�ilii„liDl.h11,„„IVth,iiiligiliitlui.i,,,,,l ... . _ lIl iunii f]Iilllll� 1 . Dill lIIliiIIIIIIII I imui III IIDII __�Jl .n. . 1 — � 3 F4 _ c a9,,:o ,w.. 200329 �i 0 MN/ACT FENCE/GATE--_ `--------------'---------J ENTRY GATE .r..".,- Itw rr+o_.!: m,..A.rn, © ( J--- A8.05 1 CAILI\IUI\ JIUI.I.I/ W .,Lun TKr.,w EELJOPOUL.09 AND m P.P•POO.to Mr Lan MLA.'•rtoCOu•eL ii.M.`4,111.ai.o.on..To mania/.....ra Ir IMAMraD 10 A Iwa Mwii...Mal WA NI Pori .oYw�4.WOOL.113 AO .w L L.A..POMO to Ire.new COAL LDAT1•01 MAN COA,MLr MOM TO APTL.JTIOIO PM.COAT.Anna WAN COAT Ale MOU,..W COAL tO A not Ft.....AM MNaD Y AITra..D or cOan __ L.�u ia.LL nuOoiK mMYOefi.1'wm'�'Lr:..io.'! rrrM�:.LL.rm to ooa..n ma rL•.a•wr -�r•'w�auDJ.a.• ..... ... .. . .. - (-I--1-1�j I .o`u tp•DV rwn.DD,orn.r. '1 •.n.31 Ill COAT uoKra 4nO ATLI.lost Ili wl11nwrOnrnl LA..tot/1rl)r.ANOW.. / run•a rnrJ I; Mao.toK iuipoaM MI.hYmM MS)PO.iwWn 4Lr.u1. I I) {-�`rr.O I I-1�� ® .tNOM.[A��tly wC+C.W OW • I NULL.4o1R'MOaMr1uR•OIGIp�.++stiMllloN 'Pr �'? / •• •.. - r- I'�I �� - -�'II'II I }'� 17 -� �I-� OKv.V.L1IN ....30.4.0raRoa.:K nav,loot, LW _ 11 I ' +/II 1`44- iD Ma aM..7 1 Y�..0.11I^Dy�LL ATO!WOW tO N rInvC10 LOU A PIP.N•MOM IOI/Tann rr.., M. KrLULD.IrAIIMa mrJ 1 •e r ti:RAN e..rt o MM .. A. r y .E•.:::�""ar, ASSOCIATES,INC. C I..,.Mn".TONo loll AO G1 Dc�Nl�xeri Pterrter.uW PAD. GOYIMC.•ILLuM At. IMLIAnaral.,..,1OLY...OICO,0.1,� L rt Q uo f J�F '..I �: D•U AID Low*.NOT L..•MAR•OL,.,.at.r•vu0. Y'.T NI. ..... ' IA .� � II® POOL., PEQi71EGEtiQ ALUM IL.a •ram-. < —` •. J• --1 a .0^�1.•.r�: oi., rwn ad • ALL IUrACia TO De CLEANED. AirdmTI—I p ©n . W S. )cWi 0.1•.rbOTl MIME"AS Pen MUNIM tbCTIIL Q-,II,II'If 1 �; A� 4 :i Fi' _��-L� © ��I�IJ{'I/�8 rnr�COw+'iw.r,.Mno r BOP „•:t ©i .tu1001•Z ea)ewnela /'`` f• u� E3--IIIrIII�III1 © © �� ,�tY teLKOI.1 - L.,-. P,r,st 'Ij AiOOre•leaa-le fIRIM.aPRta/ -v wwiF I Yy __ _� .• .f,..+ I.�,<Ir V ilk E lo)1-!O fHIBISOMI 1�—tl = In— r �• a.a GVI.'[R3 oD.IOSi Y M' Ill. 'It . � l -.Of v .QC. 0 9 GA I'tOOPe•MIS 'yj(��7 SI Q ACCD.r ea.Dna.Louvers 1 I I_I � l'E i I/_ I Roow CR.0aa SIPS•GAZEBO 1sAvA OPTAF• ) V - — Q f�L ., D.HODR2•)MS-a fHtDRNaLA RCVErs1 ...._. _,r r -i Vn�vi Vl+o.pa., El IS MOO B•024 .MuttlM VLLCO eu.D• �• 4 ri.T •NI mT! OIt DaiuL aii1i•• II 0 6LLVALW mar a. .-...'Vi.r'd�hecw f� •r...... P. 9 ISCta I.AILIGSCL1U11 ,...D.DOOMS. -i BLWACII.MOLTS•Zul•10 LIGHT FIXTURES HEYATION NelTUAt1N ItOCIR•20314a ILKA.i DAMrCOR) ._...:L..r-V - • ALL aNcco ellrA006 iO r•Scehn O BEGA CLASSIC II 7612 'tl lMBApS PAMi'ST rTACueL ZIA/.1 O BEGA 7839 TIL COI ealAL. O BEGA 116116-PD OSHAPER LIGHTRY. Dollard 901 MARINA BAY 6 u W ALTERNATE FIXTURE.An Equal S .tltute TOWNHOUSES 6 COLOR,I1241TE FINISH.PORT MARINE GRADE ii 6 '^ t .,....n KM MIA/osaLI'W aALVALW mit.W W RLt Lg.,o 0.Y.M. -.......- "-"-- OGMarLAOR KrLD'O MAMAN.,TOT, CLLOCON111PT.0Dt Og-.VVuIia.o --• ,i oscomoM PatN,L • >� M iaarL uD.G•MAOUra aApl N, S rumofmJ•rOofN 11w`d PM., _-_• —rwwi MO •Ncco MUTT.. i cualy.l!"'a+1�.cMr,nr.m } r..nmrrm+ 1 O?CTa^�' �1 S A II `.�/ .. E r� I-- ,A1 -B ''A, A'1 I , , ."�•..64 1 1 AIAfiINE WDELRAY AY BE 71D 9 d Rov imw..r reDrraJ E} `—�{ �. i B 3I ' ,, \ a d� � I, n. Ng A Y �i 06', '.►. cwrt+n.ow IV t. OM'•rYM.1 . j t i!gu,E,, 4—i. tiu _-,, ...cr.- - El Ei $.1941. Lk! N �— '_' � r " ^'� TS P f _��IIII- ��AJ!`o - �l ...idolL��1'��•b, n ) a 1 k 0= r.fifi� © fI'fI'II I r [- t �1 �� ®f _ �� i `� IfI' �© II p � •_ ©. �� o-� ,I; of I©I ® -! `'lJ4 E' � o1 � El II �1' 4 '.1 ijl� 12° �� kSo�l(1©� a t ` O.. :ar t O e _ 7 . - i4 -- - �' d.. . :. .. II a V .- fl 11 B-aKY 9 E- o,© 9 I i t6B -- ©1- ,t .g �Ii - i9-➢ IE i 1 .,fl �9-6i >��—➢r d IJ 1i1116: Illl:II,H,,ll 0 IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII!1;Hil la:' I. I.IIII,111111,'11dPilill!lj.Lid' tl11111IL I111111:'ll!II!I r t iI' dI 11 t 1L lir; " a a '1�IQ BIIIIdJIIII:IJd.,IILIL IIIL... k }�' 61 6i �l .,1.l; IIII I _� I :II II . 'I. .I4,,m.1---1 I „� � �� I: I III Ilnl fl. '�I411'.III 'I p':;r �1� �r IIII. 'I I'a y��,� ae:I�r,1 �O III,I, 1 � II,I Il,l, � I' 9T L_ _ pllb _I L GI'il! IIII J.IIII: VIIIIII� VIC _= Il1116111.ILIIl111IIL I! �IIIIIdII �PII'' I I I I IIII I��III 11'iall = III,JII,11 I,II __ II II II ,_,_�, II .,..III I: II!fI� __ 91I I I. �I I (I .. J - ill l ., ,I ;:� IIYii:l III' •.ar..aeaee..as �[� rluII�IIII'1P� 'IIUr.no�� IIlu1'I I1r I''dr opn.11lllpl: �-- ,mI1116gnlydl P'i�Illoipr„ ILII�plq Plll� lpl[Iid,'uup §W .�If+G'Jf . �a �In i,l iill.:;Ir;rlll'I. 1 �. II: - �I �:J1 I ,•t Y -`" .._. I I IIII 0 I1i Ii 1I 1'IIU� IIII IL. n.l I. I „/11 r1,7,-.'L. 4 E3 b ©© EI3 EEE333 "'"' �pw III••'ulOt b.LMrt4 MD. O 329AJ01 IA IS WCC•L WOO IMAavU,FAMaD I.RR OY.'N lY YrtCi riT! COAT.r••riroM .1 ran OYlL•A.CY•IaGT.ttl•! , \ OOP.rat r .ruCCV IMM-PYneD MT/ r TN I IV COLIP ILL. KOm AA.tm 'WPC temn.RA ) 2=At0:s.'Mir0011nm mrJ SOUTH+WES• I� 'O au B"D.rAMtD mPJ MCCCO SAKI•rAMID ItTJ VDICOMiM tLM.00. Y c.o.RLLCDMu ut.rn n .nacea` iD'""°6' „"""``HM.Fo'rI.`T.11. ELEVATIONS • WrtRR."DA)R c.a..Sm. . MCa-- PYn AO ATO.t9 Or MEW v A C 1RC,m. WEST ELEVATION IGua.LV.hr' 4i1 c''9.I1.00 I aM..T K.I....A 200329 puma RMmt A3;01 ' • • ti EXTERIOR STUCCO DPCO.a1M 11uN.anoru p I,I Y.¢.e NDA,MUD21e ebl • .t 1 W AND VIM,/kV(3/4,44111•041661 ADDER. •UD'RweR AN.-AnRAHWKD ,fir Ct.,Tr. rr,.r bw.nwn rtm 1 SI vrnu,..�n..0 uw '��Elv fo'a'"rR. �I— _ irn,.:+::- ue!ilimorKI - —beuY . r _, .. »rm,.µ. �..,1... — '-�a!a-- ,' (,(.,- II - Ih1v'1I��e�W - _---- ��p ... —' —e,. Fil .... �; ..r ». _ ?�°'°"4�'L.. _ _ L'G �� ems'µ n �ale�'��I IIII la..- . ... .. ...,., �.a�.110 MIT i� ,. -.� r- 4 ICI mi im o r mr... i; �'`'== —z�•�' �12rrr;,��rr«.DaD� ,_'�c I_a _ _IIIliIII #IIIIIt- il9'' _. 1 d'VMIllll IIlllllIIIIIlllnllllllIi.�IU.•I N .�-..QM.L«wl, 'r�•' Aeeocwiee,NC. I P�irJ.FGEti7 • LIB. I D ,—iut i ..I_ ilf' L I r -T aNddMoYl Mirrors end • rao°1" eer Dr aP.vao. 8 r I I �I I rr ,arc. o,ON xD nn rr eeuu+nl nrxax. 1 `._ EA euccoeae,buma .fl — �IIIJil� 1 ��I O II_ ili .I (gllllll_I�Il_!I w`>;:15�_'I°n D.rioo4•!c)e.lm lIRIVI erRIW:, - L,ucco Dax _�l 1O1D r°t b • D.,r.,.,ra5.rc,l.eo ruIDlLwer C.J IA L_l �� L., a� • B� E II, cWL•rr•PRPD W.PO51 @ DUPLEX/SOUTH ELEVATION —.� wD. . n KIWI' ACCENT[3401110.uno$t` rx r....n. co .n..o r can»u�vr. CROCA • • 10A,PIVIAL ROC, W tor. 4113. lE7 AcC.D.IT D,�rn r vunTFLo eD w irun IT IEt GALVALn-IS Al. prco..tW[Cl[a..polH D .rD mIr YP aTrE,CCD,FnLnW caLU4MArtDbJM1,DCDFM1 ClcAR axO b„rrrrU.?RONDE •,\,� LE-, DCWAnnI"Cara•VI,la a•nt Mane MR.,.to er1G1 D \\11�` F] ✓fifR 61 n..,: Dr WAR.AcAlicr•Tyr. DL UN+nI n.'✓rP.•:M1.L0 fLU'Itt DdrrCDIL, 31°_ ..______- . - • a D 11 • ALL erVGCo:U$acCe TO REc[IvE I J � _— - � ).. _ ..,:. .v. IrreattOR tLAIAL-r.n.n.Di rRAUxL',wo',woe,. . . F9 pcfpr.¢vim...=. ''.m ` x e1, .Np ti _ � T1 II Ho, ill. �z=CiC�I / �i.:an'.:rn..w ln. Darn -0t�xrew�n.bm [ �I - , I_ %— -',,I.:--,' If__ q °`,u.r «. MARtIA BAY "t � Ti MrsPI' .¢tl—{S'lI \ b OI [.7 0 In •i �II O TOWNHOUSES a 71 J III !HET °' ]ryS f• �ti ' L 1s1 tfI t I L'I _ "� —1 FI('\ Q DUPLEX/NORTN ELEVATION "' ®BRACKET DET.. ennn w ui...iw It xu,rw Ina AA orsucT.,me.n:°ou ut elm AL M.e•.Drrr,D.a.rnr'. / V•`r°`.,cr�.n•�w•�e•I«l.,u !r (:-t r' \ eo...., GR..n+ue"M r. /// raecr.t PI rrou..yu _ L-r• t1--I-- �- uoM uo"`oo ni°n"rzroa"�"ner,Dc MARE WAY OE P.. 8T dr1 ..v t•}� CEDAR LNDKAFDFaO•re EALH CH b2NalrKeorDrtrrm, u Irrl�MOp4e,U,N`i[M NI d.r�.rrw r.rlo N.rt rnr, 111 r+r...,l�c er b me..rice b N+•ImxD "f n- lal�- "'v.Mlwr""r' O° *' 'r'- 61°Er' -nr.- DE FIAY BEACH FL e er auex..wanrtet.rrr. �/ Q er.ccw ND.aa e•wA:ire i.ur „ woe N,r.N. gi DETAIL NIL _40 Align!�i!Ith♦S.� - r"•"D •*"� ...._. xMnD n.o".rA,n b N+re,.ro W L E !{_{� y_ ".''' ewNrnec+.r.r ,r11 --1 . I I I ifIj ?,, , e.,.,c,I,?- 47.,m ..,,,,,F II ,_ \1 j �j _ - _ N �. .._ \ .ya�ae atN+ln.r .rnv.eo ca raaevrcoe MOH .rwn,RAVD _ Aye.••""�r""°u.re�r�nnr`•"i' n .r..o,nn wnn.o:'•� t —^: y .r."1CO�rro�, Fri- — ,..ero Mr., ._�n�re.k.cwrwamra�l �l. cl- __zl- A�-""xo- r*Atr.wcm.nrxccr.m,e _ :� .rm r....o ru ..nm..,»�. -1 i `��iir ,7,_.,1_„__--- - Lu�-r...API. mnttr h 1g117=1;i1, El ,r,,e•u.exv m X IIIID `��I —.if L L I- 1 �� rWr.m.».xL..,r., aII �� DU"LFJf EI.EVATgN �_+ — — � fllIi DUPLEX/WEST ELEVATION `r "... ;1 sD e..•.r.r C 1 � w ... etv — 1' Q GATE DETAIL @ DUPLEX/EAST ELEVATION ----- -1 H1p s-sle I..r.r DI 029A902 yyy, • n,..•s Am fY Y �Uvr1 i[w, ri,r, ._1_IY-.__..;,r_•'Jy_.SLI:y Ar —(I_ v7-0ittM rt011 c.0 , . ''iIuIIII r 019' . .. n dr [ID'. 1 1111 1 r — "D ui tr" wrt puMM I� r " 1.'I rr 200l29 p PRIVACY WALL DETAIL Q PRIVACY WALL 4 GATE ELEVATION-WEST SIDE ALONG SE.ith AVE. a,.,,.n,,,er, Ski _.I` A3.02 Genie H. Rothman, P.A. Attorney at Law 70 Southeast 4th Avenue-Delray Beach,Florida 33483 (561) 279-2600-Fax(561) 276-5803 October 17,2000 RECE/VE fl OCT 17 2000 Ms.Michelle Hoyland City of Delray Beach �/4,r;, & ZOMAIG Planning and Zoning Department 'I 100 NW 1 u Avenue Delray Beach,FL 33444 RE: Approval/"Marina Bay Townhomes"/ 124 Marine Way,Delray Beach,FL Dear Michelle: I am writing to register my support for the proposed project"Marina Bay"to be located at 124 Marine Way in Delray Beach. I own the residence at 150 Marine Way which abuts the property on the South side. It is my opinion that the project would be beneficial to the area with a positive impact on the area's appearance and property value. In concept and design,the project is harmonious to the surrounding area and adds to the overall integrity of the historic architecture and charm of the Marina area. With regard to the variance aligning Marine Way,my only concern is that Parks and Recreation appears to be attempting to create a parking lot out of Marine Way for it's own purpose. If Parks and Recreation are successful in their plan,the beautiful nature of Marine Way wi11 be destroyed. I believe that any street parking along the West side of Marine Way is unnecessary for the villa residents in that each villa has a two car garage with tandem parking behind that provides four(4)parking spaces for each of the villas. As a three and a half(31 ) year resident of Marine Way,aside from overflow parking from Atlantic Avenue,I have observed that the boat owners generally need less than fifteen(15)parking spaces for their use. I believe that there is sufficient city property at the North and South end of Marine Way available for this purpose I apologize that I could not appear in person to discuss these matters,but I am currently out of the country at this time. If you would like to discuss any of the above issues in greater detail,please feel free to contact me after I return on October 26,2000. Very truly yours, Dictated but aot nad Signe " ahcaue to acbid delay in mailing 3's'• (Genie\ olcombe Rothman GHR/jrb 16 October 2000 Michelle Hoyland CE-/V . Planner, City Hall OCT 1 T `D 100 NW 1st Avenue 2000 Delray Beach, Florida 33444 G&ZONING Dear Mrs. Hoyland, Thank you so much for taking the time to explain the variances required for the property located in the Marina Historic District. After reviewing the plans and having you explain that the buildings that are planned for that area will, in fact, enhance the historical value and reduce the density of the area., I agree with their construction. I will be anxious to see the townhouses once they are constructed. The architect has certainly done a good job by putting the garages in the rear with access to them through the center road. I guess the only thing that I didn't ask at the time that we were looking at the pools is, "How will the pools be given the privacy that they should have since they face Marine Way?" Is that where the lanai comes into play? I guess I will just have to wait and see. Thank you again for your courteous explanations. Yours truly, 4)aA ' Mrs. Margot Watson 220 MacFarlane Drive# 506 Delray Beach,Florida. 33483 October 12,2000 Brian P. Sorge Sean P.Murray 129 SE 7th Avenue Delray Beach,FL 33483 Michelle Hoyland Planner,City Hall 100 NW 114 Avenue Delray Beach,FL 33444 Dear Ms.Hoyland: This letter will serve our interests at the October 18111 Historic Preservation Board Meeting rescheduled from the October 4th meeting in which we were in attendance. As the owners of the property at 129 SE 7th Avenue in Delray Beach,Florida,we have been notified of the proposed"Marina Bay Townhomes"development that will border the entire East portion of this property. 129 SE 7t Avenue includes a Spanish stucco home built during the late 1920's and maintains the style of this period. This home was purchased because of its historic design and potential for investment and improvement. A significant driver in the decision to purchase the home was the level of privacy that existed in the pool and back area of the property that was afforded by the landscaping that existed upon purchase and landscaping we have since invested to date. We are in the process of soliciting architectural bids to further improve the back area of the property and invest a significant amount of resources in these improvements. First,in general,we would like to express our support of the"Marina Bay"development and its proposed variances, in the interest of the overall improvement of the neighborhood area specifically and Delray Beach in general. Our support includes the proposed location of the pool and gazebo areas location at the front of the proposed properties.Although we realize that there will be a short-term sacrifice of privacy and the increase of noise and debris that naturally accompany a project of this scope. Our personal support, although, is contingent on the maintenance of the level of privacy we have enjoyed and plan to enjoy in the future. Our understanding of the development and landscaping plans that currently exist for the"Marina Bay"project fall short of maintaining the level of privacy that currently exists. Currently,there are tall rows of hedges,nearing 25' in height that border our property and lie on the property of the proposed development. We have invested a significant amount of resources in plantings that exist on our property to augment these plantings,but at a much lower height,there is also a chain link fence,that we believe,falls on our side of the property line. Given the plans viewed to date,it is our assumption that these tall bushes will be removed to allow for the plantings the landscaping plans have proposed. Our property falls directly behind the driveway in which cars will enter. With the proposed plans,we feel there is inadequate preparation to maintain the level of privacy given the property development proposal. • We are asking: 1. that a 6' stucco wall be erected to provide a consistent level of privacy,given the increased level of activity,specifically car traffic,to then limit car noise and headlight reflection into our property(if such a wall is erected,we are in agreement to have our chain link fence removed), 2. and that tall and mid-height mature plantings, in an appropriate density,be included on this border to block a reasonable amount of view into our property from the new construction. We feel that these requests are reasonable and will add to the privacy and value of the future property owners as well as ourselves. In closing,we are excited about the proposed development,and welcome any question that anyone involved in the project may have. You have our full cooperation in developing a reasonable resolution that serves all interests. You can contact us at 561.243.2412 or 708.386.8434(in Oak Park,Illinois). Please have any subsequent mailings concerning this project sent to: Brian P. Sorge Sean P.Murray 938 North Marion Oak Park,Illinois 60302 Sincerely, P-7 Brian P. Sorge - Sean P.Murray CC: Chip Falkanger,Bush Realty Inc. Gary Eliopoulos,Eliopoulos&Associates,Inc. OCT-@4-'00 LED 15:3s ID:LOOE MN.aL.rM EN T CORP TEL NO:914 42E-2145 UDO5 ?O'D /t. 1.. crow fl e�ak • it 5 .�. / woos • October 4, 2000 • City of Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 NW 1u'Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 Re: Approval/ *'Marina Bay Townhornes"/ 124 Marine Way,Delray Beach, FL To Whom it May Concern: I am writing to register my fall support for the proposed project `Marina. Bay" to be located at 124 Marine Way in Defray Beach. I purchased my first property in the Historic Marina District ( 24 East Ariantic Avenue) in 1978 and currently own the real estate on Atlantic Avenue from Busch's Seafood all the way to SE 7`1 Avenue. In addition to these commercial properties, I also own residences at 29 Palm Square, .30 Marine Way and 2 units at 60 Marine Way. As the largest property owner in the Historic Marina District, it is my opinion that the project would be beneficial to the area with a positive impact on the area's appearance and property value. In concept and design the project is harmonious to the surrounding area and adds to the overall integrity of the historic architecture and charm of the Marina area. tncere. Burton_ianaeiismen BHT1 C' oti :)\�`�� THE PLASTRIDGE AGENCY, INC. P.O. Drawer 730 Thomas E. Lynch, C.P.C.U. 820 North Federal Highway Michael Bottcher, C.P.C.U. 91011illifirte Delray Beach, Florida 33447-0730 Michael Oberlanderst.1919 Richard A. Hopkins, CLU Delray: (561) 276-5221 Donna Duven, CIC "Serves you best" 1 800 290-1143 Life, Health, Financial Fax (561) 276-5244 Services Department Website: www.Plastridge.com (561) 395-1433 October 1, 2000 City of Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 NW 1st Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 Re: Approval/"Marina Bay Townhomes"/ 124 Marine Way, Delray Beach, FL To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to register my full support for the proposed project "Marina Bay" to be located at 124 Marine Way in Delray Beach. As the property owner of 45 and 49 SE 7th Avenue in the Historic District, it is my opinion that the project would be beneficial to the area with a positive impact on the area's appearance and property value. In concept and design the project is harmonious to the surrounding area and adds to the overall integrity of the historic architecture and charm of the Marina area. de: "- rely, Tom Lynch '‘'N 1 0 ' .. 0 ,:, - INSURANCE AGENTS and CONSULTANTS SLNCE 1919 10 Boca Raton Office: 2100 N. Dixie Highway, Boca Raton, Florida 33431 • (561)395-1433 IIndependen! Coral Springs Office: 9660 West Sample Road, Suite 103, Coral Springs,Florida 33065 • (954)752-8230 Insurance Palm Beach Gardens Office:8895 N.Military Trail,Suite 303,Bldg.B,Palm Beach Gardens,Florida 33410 •(561)630 4955 Agent. Stuart Office: 811 S.E. Ocean Boulevard, Stuart,Florida 34994-2427 • (561)287-5532 �R � )1 ,, � L RECEIVED /�2/.�,y. 131 (3� . •7 )A- A v& SEP 2 9 2000 6)— - - — — (owNLe yo'`- 1dcTJ7'" of LG� a0� L a' l"1' ilYgG4Z"7"ItS�CC Ia -------__ .. `'CE�L� d, , ��hl la NO i eZ 7 riv r� 1�e�,��d__ i l��vs TG- _._ .____________nrLiRiN R. B% (Ji-Lk TYQ:..Vile.__Bei?J_R_NoLii.-i-__izL.,V___. 1-)y 64-1_ OE 2_I.?v j hi4vp ;'h^ T6')16UJit1uaCo utRtis oz6RDJ4� 1L�1 InA'Pi�� gilA ) __ an;fiJOi n\�:dv ice. 1 A1cK _)J 11 jtli 1 rb2;na�t� E_ 2 i ,0£ L�r n1U IP, R 0 t?LR+4 RAO -64- 1--al_L-• So Lo-9\_____136_11LP__AR 11_ 0:121 IA_(i figv R-r.- ��1L p)A Ais it�i�1 C H 7Z�—i1'?T l,pi - )' S ( t)1�- r TNT ftR + -- WA�? SUR:r,'0 a ND)cu c' t� P V&)O Yn c:du± Ill i,� A e I1141/y b�' : — d.0.0_( 'Al -PEA)C) L , -1-- E.(1>.ll 3--E. _haA_I- i;) L'ilfinigt 1-____Pijog___4)-\.E: ' ;'0 tA-frh 4- eA3-1-. ko> > R i 6- �%^ 1 v � wou 10. )) a iLv u' k r J _ Q l,s r Z c - ^ O chR i )i N�' =LJ ce_._ LAI ek_ cukP _ +)y y'c 1 e_, ._,;JJ ?1ia iU; k — — ----ijiv.NE �),L L h L L 1ij)( )A c cd , --i ilis Appa R,S zO b E 14 / �u . ERG MIL' - e. wi al}�_ G � tJ Co1v�-� Uc P we _ y t J Jjji)/ r`ll ' '� �;�-zi�s ha )6 4ied ? (--1- cootLI .)1 E }iiL - J,E. ith rve. roes ouc-r ,h�Ca p �;.,R ►',N D )i . (lio t4)c1,. 1��. hoe., -ham ._ d/ ��voz- )1 prvE -:G S OR S. `, t. 6o , Gil e3 th Liu` ,1s+l f ii --__ '6 7 ?__� ) -- ----- — — _ --—— AI,'. kl,'\f PCS AA) RC )�L WIT (h k7 ,b a. gam;-r:k(d_ (iz 'x-v 1 '() ,y_. A J Lv 'tl rl)1 KC- �� ti)lr (iNL ) 1V ✓ _,h PA. JRP,C\y 1Uc1�l,Ii=�6 10 - — : P G I cCT Gnu . �'` ' i_ _wU.11 I. I v')� N CJ Rt_b i ick -- ——_—_ .tom' a TY\ki' i%)! ga'i PLA N 3 /r z La —. - • i .r E: r� PLANNING &ZONING DEP1-;.:7-:TME i`\k � DFLRhY BEACH \,` �%oo ` FLORIDA 6 i All-America City 0�.\ • % 0\\\ a 1 -�t)% J 12-43-46-10-3b-UUU-U59U 7993 1.X I I �� MCGRATH JOAN L t 'J 15 TALL PINES DR i �`}• `' ! "i 1 CHARLESTOWN RI 02813 4005 V LF►+%--4.4Gr1.s 0s iii. i d,iiiii„..itliiiiiii.iii, ! Pic Notice 70 ti Page 2 124. 132 and 136 Marine Way (Harbor House Apartments) The front setback requirement is twenty-five feet (25'); the variances requested from the front property line are as follows from north to south: a Reduce the front setback to 8' for a distance of 25' to allow a pool and gazebo to be constructed for the north townhouse unit; a Reduce the front setback to 10' for a distance of 128' to allow 6 pools and 6 gazebos to be constructed for 6 of the townhouse units; a Reduce the front setback to 8' for a distance of 25' to allow a pool and gazebo to be constructed for the south townhouse unit. The north side setback requirement is fifteen feet (15'); the variances requested from the north property line are as follows from west to east: a Reduce the north setback to 10' for a distance of 65' to allow the north townhouse unit to be constructed; a Reduce the north setback to 0' for a distance of 10' to allow a trellis to be constructed; a Reduce the north setback to 5'to allow a gazebo to be constructed. The south side setback requirement is fifteen feet (15'); the variances requested from the south property line are as follows from west to east: a Reduce the south setback to 10' for a distance of 65' to allow the south townhouse unit to _ be constructed; a Reduce the south setback to 0' for a distance of 10' to allow a trellis to be constructed; a Reduce the south setback to 5' to allow a gazebo to be constructed. The subject property is located in the Marina Historic District, and is legally described as follows: Lots 8,9,10,11,12 and 19, a Subdivision of Block 126, Delray Florida, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 4 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida The Historic Preservation Board will conduct a public hearing at 6:00 PM on Wednesday, October 4, 2000 in the First Floor Conference Room at City Hall, 100 NW 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida, and all persons interested will be given an opportunity y to be heard. Please be advised that if a person or persons decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of the proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which to appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record, pursuant to F.S., 286.0105. If you would like further information with regard to how this proposed action may affect your property, or if you would like to review the plans for this development, please contact Michelle Hoyland, Planner, City Hall, 100 NW 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida 33444, or hone 561-2 3-7040, FAX 561-243-7 7Q l�' d'` S CEO/�7G2� ex-ca i Files p /vanan e 7 0 M Townhomes-pn —a)—/Afj/is_PV J-G7 642.12_, caZL L-411L, FROf'i BAR HARBOUR APARTMENTS, INC. FAX NO. : 5612792650 Oct. 04 2000 02:18PM P1 Cke . ar &farIour Gf parbneni c, Ate. A OONCIOMMIL� 86 MacFarlane Drive, Delray Beach, Florida 33483 Telephone 278.5000 City of Delray Beach 100 N.W. 1'Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33'111 Attn: Mr. Tony Keller, Chairperson Historical Preservation Board Ref Public Notice 70 - demolition and replacement of Harbour House apartments. Via Fax: 561-243-7221 and hand delivery Dear Mr. Keller: Thank you for Public Notice 70 concerning the above matter. It was received on or about September 27, 2000. This issue well be discussed at our next scheduled informal residents meeting to be held at 8:00pm Wednesday, October 4, 2000 and then formally brought to the attention of the Board at our next meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 17, 2000 at 8:00pm. Therefore, as President of the Board of Directors I can only offer advisory comments but will be happy to relay the official Board's position as soon as possible after the Meeting of October 17, 2000: Having served on a similar committee I believe I can understand the numerous issues that must be considered in making an appropriate decision on behalf of the citizens of Delray Beach. My comments are therefore as follows: 1.. If there is to be new development in the area of Marine Way and it's surrounding environment then I believe the entire two block area involving Marine Way should be considered as a whole, so that • development does not become a matter of inconsistent architectural appearance. - vi .ten.c Y mn: OCT042000 LUNII FRbM- -BAR HARBOUR APARTMENTS, INC. FAX NO. : 5612792650 Oct. 04 2000 02:19PM P2 2. Questions arise as to whether the current appearance should be changed. Is there a need? Will the change benefit the surrounding property owners while maintaining appropriate downtown ambiance? Are the buildings in question historic? The sign located outside the proposed development indicates that the units will sell between $400 to $900 thousand dollars. Certainly this adds value to all surrounding properties but without additional information and design review it is impossible to determine whether such increased value is worthwhile in light of the substantial change that would occur to the surrounding area. Therefore, I believe the developer should hold a Town Meeting so all residents may attend as well as members of the Historic Preservation Board. Such a meeting might eliminate any concerns. Unfortunately I have a conflict and will not be able to attend. Thank you for your time and courtesy in this matter. Sincerely, William Johnso esident Board of Directors OCT-05-2000 03 :27 AM P. 01 PROGRESSIVE RESIDENTS OF DELRAY Pat Offioa Box 1301 Delray Back Florida 33447 October 3, .2000 Haase 361'6-9400 Chairman Tony Keller and Members Historic Preservation Board Delray Beach,Florida Dear Chairman Keller and Members of the Board: Just since last April,you have had six demolition requests for historic structures which are in designated historic districts in Delray Beach—five others have come in for small-scale noncontributing buildings which ere going to be replaced by larger ones within historic districts. As one of the largest homeowners' associations in Deb ay Beach,we are very concerned about this and feel that at this rate the integrity of our historic ordinance and our comprehensive plan are in jeopardy. Not only does PROD oppose the destruction of any contributing sites within historic districts, we feel it even more critical that someone take a look at the big picture here. We are a built-out town, and redevelopment is going on largely within historic districts or beachfront areas which capture the true essence of what we are—a village by the sea We are at a crucial point now,where saving contributing sites should be part of the planning process—it's too late to wait until it reaches thc HPB. Regarding the Marina Bay Project(on this week's agenda),we feel planners and developers have made some very positive steps in incorporating this into the small-scaled historic district,where just to the south and north sit landmark Sam.Ogren and John Volk designs.But let's not forget that this project requires the destruction of four smaller buildings with replacement by one huge one. Also,one of these four that the developers are asking to demolish is a clapboard cottage from 1937 which should be saved on or near the site. Also,the developers are asking for setback variances on three sides of thc project_ PROD has reviewed the plans and feels the variances on The north and south side should not be granted,although the ones on the cast side of the project are warranted The other demolitions on this week's HPB agenda concern the Neal Farms Market property. Who in Delray Beach does not have Neal's as pan of their collective consciousness of the village by,the sea?That is what historic preservation is about—saving the lanarnarks of our history as a town,a village,and a people. The bulldozer needs to be used selectively on this project as well. The cottage here(formerly Jo's Back Room)is even more historic than the others,having been built in 1926! We urge the Historic Preservation Board Members to make the saving of important pieces of tour village part of the planning process whenever possible. We feel the two historic cottages--one on the Marina Bay project and one on the Neal's project—should without question be saved Sincerely.• Jean rBeer,President HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Project Name: COA-307, Sandoway House Nature Center Project Location: 142 S.:Ocean Boulevard ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of COA-307 with an associated elevation change for Sandoway House Nature Center, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6 (J). BACKGROUND:.. The subject property is located on the west side of A1A directly across from the public beach. Sandoway Park and parking lot is located directly to the north and the Ingraham Street parking lot is located to the south. The existing historic building, known as the Sandoway House, was constructed in 1936 as a 2 story single family residence. The Sandoway House was designated to the Local Register of Historic Places on December 3, 1996. On April 16, 1997, the Historic Preservation Board approved plans that included the conversion of the historic house to a nature center. At its meeting of November 19, 1997 the board approved landscape plans that included the conversion of the existing rear yard swimming pool into an artificial coral reef. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS: The development proposal is to install a forest green vinyl mesh awning over the existing rear yard swimming pool. The proposed awning is 25' x 34' and 11' - 8" in height and is being installed to act as a sun shelter for the previously approved artificial coral reef. The forest green awning will be consistent with the colors of the buildings existing shutters. The awning will not encroach into the ten foot (10') building setback area. RECOMMENDATION Approve COA-307 and elevation change for Sandoway House Nature Center, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (E). Attachments: • Proposed Site Plan • Proposed Awning Detail • Location Map Meeting Date: October 18, 2000 Agenda Item: Ill. A. _ . .__ . - - —� —Li — I I f ----. 1 (,, ,,____--------------"J / / f / 7 ----.I-\ 1\ \ i l 1 , 1 SANBOWAY PARS j j j 1 Ft1TUP� t .rt-a.t\ / YF7 LAE r ----_ � , _,,, \b\ S;•fa.LROC-1( i5.47H ilj j : L Nutt_A Rs'"717 ‘:...47;1--, i --L.---- I =,,,, ____,,, . _____._._._. ii . „.... . „e.E._i . rMDut.:::: CARDEN f( �✓;iY SA►y�wA7 HOUSE b f� . I d�Tfcraoac 1E-2pvotTalt 1,, . wee_ Pba— I , 1 1W14:c: �. i Y ,, . _____,__________. 1 ETL�t l • + . iNGr�AM PAR?C I � ( ► t PARYJNQ ( N { i 1 '3 tt1 r", VW.'saes IV ar r 4 � - ( „Ew A i 1 G � , ? IMG?AM DR1VF_ 1 - I - I,• /1 17, ; i } i € ! 3 - . - . . 1 i .Y 1 1 i SITE PLAN i r .! _ = •r •Z • I • .GENERAL NOTES: .. FREESTANDING AWNI.'iC C A 'ti (-'P.r. I Mwpins sb comely MlnAws cod:(la d, etioon') a.Cover weld,WOO aka/drum print. • a.M arwv0a Oa designed h secarc anc.wllh he Mowing code Salmi edition). b.Standard Daring Co...ochmler 12,as per pan geed Count&amendment.lot whd bad. '0.bit.ndarrd West Duncan;Cade,Belot 2201 oa„d) < g'�dntan phol.Oy,l lec b.tor M,tsned when In.ucch Adereach. .punned Nab 0*1 0r4 Mil releue from the franc 'Mat04111aweld bade/161biha k C FinateaMtleuE shad.Maa ele feg.mirth wind. 7.Aa PorYe.ellen'a Alta W Nny welded.7nue: O frarme Nw bawlydelip d using r ilnal analysis.• . .--r-Attachments I.balding*Should be mode Mm:- 1.9Y lap.In exp•shield. ' LW'wedge anchors(Into concrete) 4.210• laps fhb wood)' • {.JAY lapcona Onto concrete Dock) I =/ 6.mnimum spadrq Mal l»Ja•sic. 74 P•Fi 411 3 " T li1p1 i r%'P'1e }c truss , A'' fie, /. • \ / r3•Fcsts —L•proe / /- /p artn,.trt[nc.I u1E 4L1 . ,L, rw CE a GIIIIa n N Jh . I111'fl'11'IU1[ N \ ��fff�� IriI ti'yE net ��, A\ % VIM tUL1SIs In VI'11'DI MCLt I -. ,IM IOC WAV51[11 MILD I I FOF: SCALE. APPROVED CV DRAWN e•.. ANGELOJ.G.TIOERY oAft: r,.A..«.I c•oMrr. DELRAY AWNING,INC. mrsca.c•... • -I' 'rr111 80 North Congress Avenue•Delray Oeach,Florida 074e5 on.wu..•,I Phone 276.5281 _Liiiii I Il I 1 I I 11 I I ! I Love STREET N.E. 1ST ST. o w L > DELRAY \ w_ �' I I VETERANS SUMMIT n '< < ATLANTIC PARK CONDO w I ! PLAZA / I BARP, I w ( I > CAMINO REAL TERRACE II., ! i~ HOLIDAY INN w CONDO © z 0 I If) ATLANTIC AVENUE o I I I E 1 I I WATERWAY EAST - i l w -; - COMMERCIAL -> < I <1--1 I CONDO -< 1 Li I 1 BAR/HR/ / I m CONDO I I . I I I Ic z �� W f III I l o '— //CRIAHAM OCEAN PLACE I_ a AV_NU= I Li Z U J I OCEAN TERR. SEAGATE I OCEAN TERR. O W ..... TOWERSI 1 1 U In I -.C , ,N A S SIA U I SIT.I ° L--I U 1 I I I 1 1 1 U z W i I Z. I ,_ BAY STREET I Z I I -...1I LANIKAI VILLAS CONDO LANGER WAY I w v, i I I II I I I 4 c e N --msma—' SANDOWAY HOUSE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY.. OF DELRAY BEACH, FL A. -- DITTTAL BASE MAP S:STEM -- MAR REF: LMOB7